diff --git a/main/part_2/0013404413.json b/main/part_2/0013404413.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ebada9487dc286c2800112b6d55de48c3b99072a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0013404413.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d1ec3254e9a9f32d837385f9c47b5fc9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6e809312-7953-442c-a6b0-3d1d905c5113/retrieve","id":"-691947576"},"keywords":["Food loss and waste","Postharvest loss","Value chains","Climate change mitigation","USAID"],"sieverID":"a9e3a583-dc07-427f-a852-7690f737e279","content":"Reducing food loss in agricultural development projects through value chain efficiency. CCAFS Working Paper no. 204. Wageningen, The Netherlands: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Available online at: www.ccafs.cgiar.org Titles in this Working Paper series aim to disseminate interim climate change, agriculture and food security research and practices and stimulate feedback from the scientific community. This work was implemented as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), which is carried out with support from CGIAR Fund Donors and through bilateral funding agreements. For details please visit https://ccafs.cgiar.org/donors.A grand challenge of the 21 st century is increasing economic growth across the globe while dramatically decreasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions -decoupling two trends that have often moved in concert in the past. Along with economic growth and climate change, there is an urgent need to provide food security for a growing population. Sustainable agricultural development aims to address these challenges -and others -by increasing agricultural and economic productivity, helping farmers and herders adapt to climate change and variability, and decreasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural production and land use change. Collectively, these three areas -production, adaptation and mitigation--are the pillars of climate-smart agriculture. These emissions contribute nearly a quarter of GHG emissions globally (Smith et al. 2014), and therefore need to play a part in overall emission reductions.Reducing food loss (which commonly refers to a decrease in edible food early in the supply chain) and waste (which generally occurs at retail and consumer stages) addresses the grand challenges of future food security and climate change by simultaneously addressing productivity and GHG emission reductions. Roughly one-third of food is lost or wasted worldwide, representing large, potentially avoidable losses of land, water, and energy (Gustavsson et al. 2011). Reduced food loss or waste (FLW) would result in more food for sale, distribution and consumption, increasing food security, while reducing the demand for increased food production with its attendant environmental burden (Hiç et al. 2016). In addition, interventions designed to reduce FLW can improve small-scale producers' resilience to climate change and variability, which generally impacts global food systems positively.Reducing FLW increases food availability at the farm gate, leading to a higher percentage of food sold on the market and higher incomes (Stathers, Lamboll, & Mvumi. 2013).FLW occurs at multiple points along the food value chain, from upstream producer-dominated stages to downstream consumer-dominated stages (Porter & Reay 2015). Both developing and industrialized countries experience large amounts of FLW, although the point of loss or waste varies with production practices, value chain, and state of value chain development.Developing countries experience food loss due to limited infrastructure and little available capital in the food value chain (Beddington et al. 2012, Hodges 2012, Rosegrant et al. 2016).Most research in developing countries has considered mainly on-farm losses rather than losses further down the supply chain, for example during processing, storage, and transportation (Sheahan & Barrett 2016). More industrialized countries have more food waste due to lack of coordination among value chain actors and higher quality standards that cause rejection of food items for minor imperfections (Gustavsson et al. 2011).Definitions of postharvest loss (PHL) and food loss and waste vary among sectors. FAO (2011) defines PHL of agricultural products as any product loss caused by physical spilling and/or degradation during handling, storage, and transportation from the farm to distribution.FAO distinguishes food loss and food waste by the phase where the loss or waste occurs, e.g., food loss occurs pre-consumer and food waste occurs at the consumer phase. Porter et al. (2015) modified the FAO definitions to distinguish between \"lost food\" and \"wasted food\" in order to separate the political term of \"waste.\" The Global Knowledge Initiative (2014) melds food waste and loss into the term \"food wastage.\" Sims et al. (2015) states, \"wastage occurs mostly during agricultural production, PHL handling and storage, and consumption phases.\"Often, distinguishing between loss and waste reflects \"fundamentally different perspectives, underlying objectives, and policy concerns\" (HLPE 2014). In this paper, we follow the most common definitions in FLW literature; food loss occurs prior to food reaching the consumer, and food waste occurs at the consumer level. We refer to food loss and food waste collectively as FLW throughout this document.Estimating FLW is a challenging task. Many global-scale estimates of FLW are derived from a small assortment of primary sources, often including FAO's balance sheets, largely because it is challenging to collect and synthesize FLW information across countries (Affognon et al. 2015, Rosegrant et al. 2016). These challenges with large-scale synthesis stem from the fact that FWL data originate from diverse sources collected at varying geographic scales (global, regional, local) and along different parts of the value chain (production, processing, storage) (Sheahan & Barrett 2016). Even regional estimates often include a limited number of countries; for example, a PHL meta-analysis by Affognon et al. (2015) evaluates interventions in several categories (grains, vegetables, fruits, rootstocks, and animal products), and in six African countries. Overall, limited availability of comparable data sets has resulted in few research studies that collect FLW data on multiple crops across many countries. This paper describes the scope of FLW interventions and estimates the extent to which they reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in diverse systems. Reducing FLW can contribute to GHG mitigation via two pathways. First, reducing loss increases the efficiency of the food supply chain, resulting in increased efficiency of GHG emissions per unit of food produced (emission intensity). Total emissions decline when farmers combine FLW reduction with (a) reducing emissions in the supply chain through improved practices or technologies (such as more efficient energy use), or (b) reducing agricultural production, a strategy that is relevant where farmers are constrained by high input costs (e.g. fertilizer, livestock feed, electricity) or face limited markets for their products (Kendall, 2000). Lipinski et al. (2013) estimate that higher production needs due to FLW generate 3,300-5,600 million Mt of unnecessary greenhouse gas emissions annually. This theory is relevant when producers are financially strained by the cost of inputs or cannot produce sufficient amounts of food after FLW occurs.Second, decomposition of lost or wasted food releases methane, nitrous oxide, and CO2, so decreasing FLW may reduce emissions from this route as well. However, even if consumed, food decomposes in humans and ultimately produces carbon dioxide, methane and indirectly nitrous oxide, so the potential to reduce GHG emissions from decomposition of FLW is salient mainly when FLW decomposes in oxygen-poor conditions, as in a landfill, where methane emissions are much higher than they would be if food were consumed. This report considers GHG reductions resulting only from efficiency in the food supply chain the first of these two paths.Food loss and waste at each stage of the value chain leaves less food available in each subsequent stage, causing large cumulative reductions in food available for consumption. This cascade also affects actors all along the value chain (Figure 1). For example, losses at harvest leave fewer products for processors. All stakeholders in the value chain therefore share a profit motive to minimize loss (Sheahan & Barrett 2016). Input choice. Interventions influencing producers' input choices strive to promote preharvesting decisions that lead to a reduction in losses at later stages (HLPE 2014). Farmers have many means of affecting production through input choice. Producers may reduce food loss by selecting seed varieties that: a) result in products that last longer after harvest (Pessu et al. 2011, Prusky 2011); b) yield a marketable product even under challenging growing conditions, including climate change (e.g. species or varieties that tolerate heat, drought or salinity); or c) attain or retain desirable quality attributes that increase the likelihood of consumption (e.g., color, texture, taste) (HLPE 2014). In animal production, input breed selection and genetic considerations can reduce incidence of disease or malformations, reducing food loss (Stear et al. 2001). Providing shade could also reduce heat stress or nutrient-rich food sources are also ways to affect animal health and productivity through input choices.Harvesting. Carefully designed planting and harvesting calendars can help farmers time harvest to maximize shelf life, such as using ambient conditions to reduce moisture in grains before harvest (Prusky 2011, Paulsen et al. 2015). Improved physical handling during harvest can reduce losses due to deterioration of produce. For example, mangos harvested with cutting poles reduced the frequency of latex burns on fruits (Bonicet 2013). Training field workers to reduce mechanical damages during harvest also reduces losses (Prusky 2011, Paulsen et al. 2015), so Paulsen et al. (2015) recommend that handlers attend seminars to hone their skills before operating mechanized equipment and processers. In the livestock sector, improved training of dairy farmers in milk handling practices reduces product contamination and microbial spoilage (Lore et al. 2005). Sorting recently harvested produce to separate damaged crops from undamaged crops also reduces loss (Pessu et al. 2011).Humidity gauges indicate optimal moisture levels for produce at harvesting time and can thus reduce the incidence of mold and rot (Hell et al. 2010).Processing. Processing includes transforming a product into a longer-lasting form (Lore et al. 2005), for example by converting milk to value-added products such as butter, yogurt, and cheese or drying produce to achieve moisture levels ideal for storage (Hell et al. 2010). Lore et al. (2015) explain the importance of training handlers in milk hygiene. For rice and beans, processing improvements include proper drying in preparation for storage (Rani et al. 2013).Reducing contamination during processing (Karlovsky et al., 2016) also reduces spoilage.Storage. The location and physical micro-environment of products during storage impacts FLW. Physical containers, such as plastic crates, off-ground basins, silos, and triple bags, reduce FLW by limiting contamination, product deterioration, and predation by pests (De Groote et al. 2013, Lipinski et al. 2013, Baoua et al. 2014). In many areas, storage conditions are poor, including the absence of appropriate refrigeration and cooling structures for dairy and meat products (Lore et al. 2005). Maintenance of the cold chain from harvest to retail reduces spoilage of fruits and vegetables (Prusky, 2011). Innovative cooling mechanisms, such as low-to no-energy refrigerators, require less mechanical input (Lipinski et al., 2013) and so should be considered in development initiatives. Finally, packaging improvements can reduce FLW by maintaining product quality through storage and shipment to retail (Opara & Mditshwa, 2013). Proper packaging can also contribute to hygiene during food handling and promote longer shelf-life of food products (Opara & Mditshwa, 2013).Transportation. FLW in the transport or shipping of products between PHL phases, and to retail, can be reduced through local infrastructure improvements such as feeder roads that connect markets and agricultural centers (Beddington et al. 2012, Bahadur et al. 2016).Another promising option is collection centers, centralized hubs where products or commodities can be consolidated for processors to pick up before retail (Lore et al. 2005).Modifying transportation procedures, such as hauling during the cool part of the day, can also reduce losses (Pessu et al. 2011).Reducing FLW is an under-used approach for combating climate change. A literature review conducted in late 2016 revealed only 23 studies that addressed GHG emissions resulting from either food loss or food waste or both. Some studies provided global estimates of all FLW, and others made regional-or country-level estimates for specific value chain phases (See Appendix 1). Only one article presented primary FLW data; the other 22 papers relied on preexisting studies or data. The single paper presenting primary data focused on two crops in one region in Brazil (Goldsmith et al. 2015). Seven of the eight studies with global FLW-driven GHG emission estimates relied on FAO country estimates, although the reworking and application of the data varied. The research team gathered estimates of FLW (or PHL since FLW and PHL were used interchangeably in some projects) from implementing partners during semi-structured interviews; the team did not make primary measurements. Individuals interviewed had significant experience working in the targeted value chains in these countries.USAID defines food losses as occurring from field to market (MacCartee 2013). When asked, interviewees emphasized the USAID definition, which includes production (harvest and input selection), processing, and storage losses. The research team asked managers to estimate the percentage of FLW ex ante with and without project interventions and to describe the practices involved in securing FLW reductions. In most instances, FLW data was collected through qualitative surveys and interviews and had already been shared in official project reporting to USAID. In a few instances, project managers developed quantitative surveys to measure reductions in FLW.In addition to conducting interviews, the project team reviewed and coded project documents, including work plans, websites, and annual and quarterly monitoring reports. This content analysis provided information on the breadth of FLW interventions and enabled identification of key terms for interventions based on phases, for example \"threshing\" is a processing intervention, and \"covered silo\" is a storage intervention.The team calculated the per unit impact of FLW interventions as the change in FLW with interventions compared to business-as-usual (BAU) (Equation 1). The total FLW in both cases is a function of the total yield and the percentage FLW, given the estimated amount of product lost per ha or per head of livestock per year.\uD835\uDC6D\uD835\uDC73\uD835\uDC7E \uD835\uDC8A\uD835\uDC8E\uD835\uDC91\uD835\uDC82\uD835\uDC84\uD835\uDC95 = (\uD835\uDC6D\uD835\uDC73\uD835\uDC7E \uD835\uDC70\uD835\uDC8F\uD835\uDC95\uD835\uDC86\uD835\uDC93\uD835\uDC97\uD835\uDC86\uD835\uDC8F\uD835\uDC95\uD835\uDC8A\uD835\uDC90\uD835\uDC8F \uD835\uDC99 \uD835\uDC9A\uD835\uDC8A\uD835\uDC86\uD835\uDC8D\uD835\uDC85 \uD835\uDC70\uD835\uDC8F\uD835\uDC95\uD835\uDC86\uD835\uDC93\uD835\uDC97\uD835\uDC86\uD835\uDC8F\uD835\uDC95\uD835\uDC8A\uD835\uDC90\uD835\uDC8F ) − (\uD835\uDC6D\uD835\uDC73\uD835\uDC7E \uD835\uDC69\uD835\uDC68\uD835\uDC7C \uD835\uDC99 \uD835\uDC9A\uD835\uDC8A\uD835\uDC86\uD835\uDC8D\uD835\uDC85 \uD835\uDC69\uD835\uDC68\uD835\uDC7C )Implementing partners of selected projects provided information, data, and estimates on adoption rates of improved agricultural practices and annual yields. The research team then estimated GHG emissions and carbon sequestration associated with the BAU and improved agricultural practices using the Ex-Ante carbon balance tool (EX-ACT) developed by FAO using tier 1 guidelines (Bernoux et al. 2010, Bockel et al. 2013, Grewer et al. 2016), or using other methods if they were more appropriate for that value chain (Grewer et al. 2016).Uncertainties associated with these estimates can range from 30-50%; for nitrous oxide emissions from fertilizer use the uncertainty can be as high as 300%. Despite these uncertainties, EX-ACT represents the accepted state of the science and provides a comparable tool to other regions or studies. EX-ACT was selected based on its ability to account for a variety of GHGs, practices, and environments. Additional details on the method for deriving emission intensity and practice-based estimates can be found in Grewer et al. (2016). When accounting for the emission implications of FLW, our estimates only included the GHG impact of production of the lost or wasted food, not emissions resulting from its decomposition. Further, FLW studies do not lend themselves to assessing long-term sequestration of carbon. This work, and most work in FLW, does not account for the possibility of increased emissions introduced by new processing methods, storage, or transportation interventions.This study surveyed the types of FLW interventions within selected projects to examine opportunities for low emissions development, and results reflect several methodological constraints. First, in most instances the estimates and intervention descriptions used are based on the expert judgment of the projects' implementing partners and were not independently verified. Second, the report reviewed only losses in the quantity of product -the physical decrease in product available, measured by weight or volume. Third, researchers did not provide a specific time horizon for storage to ensure uniformity of data. Finally, the study and interviews focused on climate change mitigation as a whole, the study focused on value chains with opportunities for significant GHG emission reductions (most often in the livestock, rice, and maize sectors) and carbon sequestration (perennials and agroforestry), rather than value chains with high FLW opportunities.In addition, GHG estimation methods used in this paper did not account for the possibility of increased emissions resulting from new processing methods, storage, or transportation interventions, which could offset emission reductions. For instance, improvements in the dairy cold chain could increase GHG emissions due to increased electricity usage, or an established cold chain could encourage and promote increased dairy production. Changes in handling and packaging could improve hygiene during food handling and promote longer shelf-life of food products, but they also may lead to more waste. Finally, this research did not attempt to quantify the GHG implications of transportation interventions.The team identified 13 Feed the Future projects that had the potential for GHG emissions mitigation through FLW (Table 1). • ACCESO (Honduras) studied twelve varieties of yellow onions to determine which variety had the longest shelf life and exhibited most resistance to diseases.• LPIN (Bangladesh) hosted training events for livestock producers on techniques for selecting fit, healthy animals for slaughter.• MARKETS II (Nigeria) promoted farmer selection of cocoa varieties that have better disease and pest resistance qualities and characteristics desired by buyers.• RDCP (Rwanda) identified livestock genetic qualities and breeding decisions that promote productive and healthy animals. This intervention also considered financial sustainability, accessibility of knowledge and practices, and feasibility of implementing decisions.Harvesting • ACCESO (Honduras) promoted use of a planting and harvesting calendar to help farmers time their harvest to maximize revenue and shelf life.• Chanje (Haiti) promoted use of cutting poles during harvesting to reduce damage to mangos from latex burns on the fruits, thus decreasing the market rejection rate.• MARKETS II (Nigeria) supported use of wooden mallets instead of piercing knives for cocoa bean harvest to reduce beans' exposure to diseases and other contaminants. • AGP-AMDe (Ethiopia) improved the ability of the Ethiopian Commodity Exchange to evaluate and grade the quality of green coffee beans and document product traceability.• Chanje (Haiti) supported new techniques to dry mangos and add value to other export-bound products, in partnership with the farmer association ADAIM.• CPM (Uganda) provided farmers with equipment needed for processing, including bean threshers, cleaning tools, and tarpaulins.• MARKETS II (Nigeria) developed interventions and techniques for fish processing at larger scales, including smoking and drying methods, based on recommendations and needs of fish producers and processors to scale-up their operations.• RDCP (Rwanda) developed potential areas of investments for dairy processing, including value-added products that process milk. • ADVANCE (Ghana) introduced training to demonstrate construction of improved storage silos that are made by hand using locally available, often natural, materials.• AGP-AMDe (Ethiopia) leveraged the accessibility of portable bag-stitching machines for processors to enable increased storage efficiency that minimizes waste.• Camel Milk (Ethiopia) provided containers for more hygienic milk storage.• Chanje (Haiti) promoted improved storage and transportation structures, such as plastic crates, to decrease bruising and blemishes of fresh products such as mangos.• FED (Liberia) hosted training sessions on the construction and feasibility of lowenergy refrigeration facilities and charcoal-based cool storage units.• FED (Liberia) supported training on pest control methods, including fabrication of rat guards to minimize disease, contamination, and product loss.• KAVES (Kenya) promoted a hermetic storage bag technology to store maize for personal use at home.Transportation. Many interventions in the transportation stage were also applicable at the storage stage, as it is economical and efficient for storage solutions to also be safe and efficient for transport. Some transportation interventions noted the importance of wellmaintained and accessible roadways and systems to connect various value chain stakeholders.A few interventions focused on strategically located collection and distribution centers, in order to facilitate access by a substantial number of producers, processors, and distributors.• Camel Milk (Ethiopia) identified a shortcoming of temperature-controlled storage and transport systems, denoting a need for cold-chain interventions.• Chanje (Haiti) introduced pack frames that safely store and protect products during transport on the backs of donkeys. This was especially useful in locations inaccessible to vehicles.• Chanje (Haiti) facilitated infrastructure development, including road restoration, with financial support from development partners.• KAVES (Kenya) supported collection centers that increased milk storage capacity.Data from interventions in dairy, maize, rice, vegetables, and other products show that the percentages of FLW and the impacts of interventions varied greatly by product (Table 2).Overall, most agricultural supply chains involved a range of FLW interventions (Table 3) with large reductions in overall FLW.• Dairy. Food loss reduction estimates varied greatly among the dairy projects in the study. As shown in Table 2, FLW estimates ranged from 5-50% in the BAU approach and declined 4-10% as a result of intervention. CMVCD and RDCP both estimated Although all four projects promoted practices to reduce FLW in multiple stages of the value chain (production, processing, and storage), CMVCD and RDCP estimated much higher existing levels of food loss than PIN and KAVES.• Maize. Projects estimated that existing FLW rates of 5-30% for maize could be reduced to 3-17% with project interventions. ADVANCE II estimated the largest change in FLW, a 20-percentage point reduction, partially due to improved storage from construction of new silos.• Vegetables. Projects estimated that BAU of FLW for vegetables ranged from 18-38%, and may be decreased to 5-20% through project interventions. Estimates varied widely, based on crop and level of market development. HARVEST estimated a 20% reduction in FLW due to dramatic improvements in PHL handling. Chanje and ACCESO aimed to reduce FLW of vegetables through improved storage and transportation.• Rice. Projects estimated that BAU for FLW of 13-30% in rice could be reduced to 3-22% due to project interventions. HARVEST estimated the greatest reduction (20%)in FLW, attributing it to interventions in storage and processing (drying). MARKETS II estimated little change (2.5%) in FLW as it focused on milling of rice as well as loss in other crops.• Market goods. The remaining products cover a variety of foods, including fruits, perennials, legumes, and grains. Estimated BAU of FLW ranged from 1-30% and are reduced to 0-16% through project interventions. Agricultural development projects adopted FLW activities as part of a strategy to increase food security. Ex ante emission estimates suggest reducing FLW may offer a significant and under-utilized opportunity for increasing productivity and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, two pillars of climate-smart agriculture. Because reducing FLW leaves more food available for consumption and sale, while also reducing GHG emissions, it decouples trajectories of economic growth and GHG emissions.The Feed the Future projects examined by this study also illustrate how climate-smart agricultural development can increase food security -the primary objective for which these projects were designed -by increasing effective food or product availability after FLW and decreasing emission intensity. Our analysis also shows that market-based approaches can achieve both FLW and emission reductions. This study, as most FLW studies, does not account for the possibility of increased emissions introduced by new processing methods, storage, or transportation interventions that could be estimated with full life cycle analyses.Using a broader framework for FLW analyses could expand the range of project interventions, for example to efficiently cool and transport, while accounting for potential additions in emissions from increased fuel use. We expect that emission intensity from interventions will remain lower than the business-as-usual development trajectory, even in a life-cycle analysis perspective.Cost-effective reductions in FLW benefit actors throughout the value chain, beginning with the producers. Small changes in FLW can have large impacts on food security among smallholder farmers and dairy producers. At the regional and national scales, reduced FLW Agricultural Growth Project and trace the quality and grading of green coffee beans, which led to more profitability and higher revenue on the market. By partnering with over fifty wheat smallholder cooperatives, AGP promoted sorting and processing technology for wheat threshing which decreased the amount and frequency of wheat loss. Finally, the project leveraged the access to machines that can portably stitch bags for storage of the products"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0025895109.json b/main/part_2/0025895109.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..601a65f4cc634c86071f43dd415c98f49a6e9136 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0025895109.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3a6e99570113ac6ce162fc1adb8acdf2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/9da4499a-e119-4949-bf09-8355da9a87d1/content","id":"-1983969087"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8178c5e4-f9d1-4128-98b0-52b0067b2ab7","content":"Breeding material generated: 2521 F1 (simple and top), 8042 F2-F5 selected bulk pops, 89828 F6/F7 progeny rows, 30392 advanced lines, 9540 entries in yield trial (2 reps) and 1092 entries in yield trials (3 reps, 6 management) 2. Ten locations used in selection process: • Five in Mexico (Cd. Obregon, Toluca, El Batan, Aqua Fria and Mexicali) • Two in Africa (Njoro, Kenya and Kulumsa, Ethiopia) • Three in BISA, India (for phenotyping and selection by all national partners) 3. From above, nurseries and trials prepared and shipped to India for 2017-18 cycle I: Bread wheat improvement: high yielding, heat tolerant germplasm with other India relevant traits Germplasm provided in 2017-18 cycle No. of lines 283 277 157 136 1099 116 sets of international trials/nurseries having 1099 lines to 30 centres. All germplasm shared through ICAR-IIWBRGrain yield of 8.67 t/ha obtained in 2017 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.4 5.0 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.4 8.0 8.6 9.2 9.8 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.7 5.3 5.9 6.5 7.1 7.7 8.3 8.9 9.5 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.4 5.0 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.4 8.0 8.6 9.2 9.8 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.7 5.3 5.9 6.5 7.1 7.7 8.3 8.9 9.5 Pusa 0 50 100 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.4 5.0 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.4 8.0 8.6 9.2 9.8 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.7 5.3 5.9 6.5 7.1 7.7 8.3 8.9 9.5 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.4 5.0 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.4 8.0 8.6 9.2 9.8 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.7 5.3 5.9 6.5 7.1 7.7 8.3 8.9 9.5 Ludhiana 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.4 5.0 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.4 8.0 8.6 9.2 9.8 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.7 5.3 5.9 6.5 7.1 7.7 8.3 8.9 9.5 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.4 5.0 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.4 8.0 8.6 9.2 9.8 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.7 5.3 5.9 6.5 7. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0031997529.json b/main/part_2/0031997529.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c180ade1a77a6646633129ab2f6dfc1504d1a19 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0031997529.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3979439a35ff338451352f63c35ba86a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5f6a7c85-867a-41a7-9caf-2e6aba01c540/retrieve","id":"1224907282"},"keywords":["hermetic technologies","insects","maize landraces","seed germination","storage losses"],"sieverID":"823c8448-b517-4e0c-a606-cfa3adc67453","content":"In Mexico, smallholder farmers produce locally adapted maize varieties, generally called landraces, for food. They participate in the conservation of landraces by selecting and storing their seeds from one production cycle to another, but are facing challenges such as storage losses caused by insects (mainly Sitophilus zeamais and Prostephanus truncatus) and climate change. In the current study, the effectiveness of the conventional storage practices of farmers in the highlands of Mexico (polypropylene woven bags) in minimizing storage losses and maintaining seed germination was compared with hermetic storage technologies. After six and three months of storage, the percentage of insect damage and weight loss was highest in samples stored in polypropylene woven bags, reaching 61.4% and 23.4% after six months of storage. On the contrary, with hermetic technologies, storage losses were minimal, with maximums of 4.1% and 2.2% for insect damage and weight loss, respectively. Overall, the germination rate of samples stored in these airtight containers was greater than 90%. The results of this study demonstrate the potential of hermetic technologies in preserving the biodiversity of maize seed landraces and strengthening smallholders' food security.Mexico is a center of origin, domestication and diversity for maize, a major crop that contributes to the livelihoods of millions of people [1,2]. Maize landraces-heirloom varieties created through farmer selection over hundreds of years-are key to food sovereignty and cultural identity in Mexico and Latin America [3][4][5]. Smallholder farmers in Mexico grow landraces for food, as their grain quality is often preferred for popular dishes and they are sometimes better adapted to local environmental conditions and rainfed agriculture [5][6][7]. Farmers play an important role in preserving maize landrace diversity through their historical and cultural identification of maize as a primary crop, as well as their land use, selection of traits, and seed exchanges through social networks [8]. The in situ conservation of landrace diversity allows landraces to evolve in their original areas of distribution, influenced by farmers' selection and environmental factors [5].At the same time, maize landraces face serious threats, including global warming, low productivity, and high levels of postharvest loss under farmers' conventional storage conditions [9,10]. Losses in the quantity and quality of grain and seed under storage have been estimated to be as high as 60% in lowland conditions under common on-farm storage technologies, which include the use of polypropylene woven bags with or without aluminum phosphide tablets [10]. Postharvest insect pests are the main cause of losses in dry maize, particularly the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), the large grain borer Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), and the Angoumois grain moth Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) [11]. Hermetically sealed grain storage technologies, including hermetic metal silos and hermetic bags, can minimize losses from storage pests [10,12], constraining or killing the insects through oxygen depletion and a subsequent increase in carbon dioxide [13]. However, hermetic containers are generally not available for many smallholders. Odjo et al. [10] demonstrated the effectiveness of other sealed storage alternatives in Mexico, including recycled containers (plastic bottles or plastic barrels) that may be a good fit for smallholder farmers for preserving grain and seed quantity and quality [10,14]. In a following study, Odjo et al. [14] also demonstrated that hermetic technologies including recycled containers can preserve seed quality in Mexico by maintaining a low-equilibrium relative humidity and seed dryness, as well as limiting oxygen availability during storage and minimizing grain quality loss.The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) has been promoting hermetic technologies for storage in smallholders' farming systems in Mexico within the framework of the Integrated Agri-food Systems Initiative (IASI) [15,16]. This approach, implemented through the innovation hub model, goes beyond introducing innovation and has a strong focus on knowledge exchange and co-creation with farmers to achieve sustainable and systemic change [17]. During interactions with farmers, a decrease in the germination of maize landrace seeds stored in hermetic technologies was reported. Some local experts suggest the percussion of seeds before sowing, or allowing the seed to \"breathe\" outside the container for anywhere from three days to two weeks before sowing to increase germination rate [18].A decrease in germination for seeds stored in hermetic containers has been reported for seeds with moisture content over 13% (wet basis). Adhikarinayake et al. [19] reported a decrease in seed viability in paddy rice stored under hermetic conditions at 14.1% moisture content, citing the combined effects of oxygen depletion and increased carbon dioxide and moisture content. Moreno-Martinez et al. [20] also reported lower germination in maize seed stored in hermetic containers at 15% moisture, citing the effect of low oxygen levels on seed embryos. Seed quality includes germination rate, viability, and longevity, and is generally affected by three main factors: seed moisture content, temperature, and the relative humidity of the storage environment. High oxygen levels are also associated with seed viability declines; mainly due to oxidative processes, particularly in seed stored at high moisture contents [21]. Storing low moisture content seed using hermetic technologies allows the preservation of seed quality by maintaining a low-equilibrium relative humidity and seed dryness, as well as limiting oxygen availability during storage [22][23][24][25]. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effect of different storage technologies, as well as the suggested seed treatments, on maize landrace seed germination.This study evaluates the effects of storage technologies (polypropylene woven bags vs. hermetic storage technologies) on maize landraces in the central highlands of Mexico, specifically, on major insect pests (S. zeamais, P. truncatus, and S. cerealella), kernel damage, and seed germination, as well as whether germination rate is affected by seed treatments (percussion and delaying sowing after opening hermetic technologies).On-farm storage experiments were established in 2019 at the experiment station of CIMMYT at El Batán Texcoco, the State of Mexico, Mexico (2282 m above sea level), for three and six months. Seeds of the four Mexican landraces used were sourced locally and grown on the station following identical agronomic practices (date of sowing, fertilization, pest managements, date of harvest). Harvested kernels were dried and stored as follows (Table 1): (1) polypropylene woven bags (PP) (farmers' conventional storage practices) and (2) hermetically sealed containers, either the GrainPro Hermetic SuperGrainbag ® Premium RZ (GrainPro Inc, Washington, USA; bags obtained from the official Mexican representative), a hermetic bag with a zip system, or plastic bottles. GrainPro hermetic bags are made of high-strength polyethylene plastic with barrier layers, while plastic bottles are made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). These materials have low oxygen permeability in comparison with polypropylene woven bags. Michiels et al. [26] reported the rate of dioxygen permeability measured at a relative humidity of 50% and a temperature of 23 • C for polypropylene materials between 50 and 100 cm 3 .mm.m −2 .day −1 .atm −1 , while polyethylene plastics have values of dioxygen permeability between 0.5 and 5 cm 3 .mm.m −2 .day −1 .atm −1 . As reported by Odjo et al. [14], hermetic bags were used in combination with polypropylene woven bags as recommended by the provider for additional protection. Plastic bottles that were recycled water and soda containers were used for some of the varieties with low productivity, as farmers generally store 2 kg of seed. Both hermetic bags and plastic bottles were checked for any damage/perforation by inflating them. After filling with kernels, the hermetic bags were sealed with a zip system while the plastic bottles were sealed with their original cap wrapped with tape to minimize oxygen entry. The containers were randomly arranged on a wooden pallet platform with three replicates per storage technology for each storage time.The landraces used were of white, yellow, blue, and pink grain and with flotation indices (an indirect parameter of grain hardness determined by counting the number of floating grains after six strokes of mild stirring of 100 grains in a sodium nitrate solution with a specific density of 1.25 g mL −1 ) values varying from 34 to 80% (Table 1). Based on this parameter and the Mexican norm NMX-FF-034/1-SCFI-2002 [27], their endosperm hardness was intermediate (Magdalena and VC Rosado), hard (VC Amarillo) and soft (SJR Azul). Hermetic bags were used in comparison with polypropylene woven bags for Magdalena and VC Amarillo, while plastic bottles were used for VC Rosado and SJR Azul, since they have low productivity and farmers generally store around 2 kg of seed [28].Before storage, moisture content was measured using a hand-held grain moisture tester (John Deere Moisture Check Plus Grain Moisture, IL, USA), calibrated using the manufacturer's recommendations. Average moisture content varied between 10.0 and 12.6% on a wet basis (Table 1). After cleaning and before filling the storage containers, three representative samples of approximately 500 g were obtained to measure insect damage, referring to kernels with perforations or galleries caused by insect feeding. Insect damage before storage varied from 0.6 to 4.0% for the different varieties evaluated. The numbers of live insects that come from natural infestation in the field and were present in the samples were counted. The insect species considered are the most important in Mexico [11]: S. zeamais, P. truncatus, and S. cerealella. Generally, there was fewer than 1 live insect per 500 g of sample, prior to storage (Table 1).Three representative samples free of pests were also collected and stored at −18 • C for further seed analyses. After three and six months, the storage containers were opened, and three representative samples were collected from the top, middle, and bottom of each container using hand scoops. The seed moisture content and percentage of insect damage were measured using the method described above. The \"weight loss\" parameter, which refers to kernel loss during the storage period from insect feeding, was also estimated as per Boxall [29].Germination tests were performed on initial samples defrosted over one night at room temperature and samples without apparent damage collected after three and six months of storage, with or without percussion treatment. Samples without percussion were kept in open plastic jars at room temperature.Intended to create an abrasive effect on the seed pericarp and facilitate water imbibition, the percussion treatment was applied to approximately 100 g for 5 min just before the germination assay, using a device equipped with aluminum US standard testing sieve pans and adapted with a Power Electric motor, CPG1446RB1A (Mexico), at 1725 rpm, resulting in approximately 270 oscillations per minute. Germination assays were performed on the seeds obtained (no percussion, percussion) using the rolled paper towel seed germination test of CIMMYT [30] at 1, 3, 7, and 15 days after opening the storage containers. Fifty seeds without apparent damage were randomly selected and placed on the upper halves of moist filters or blotter paper towels (50 × 25 cm) and incubated in a seed incubator at 90% relative humidity, alternating between 12 h at 30 • C in light and 12 h at 20 • C in the dark, for 7 days, based on the 1985 recommendations of the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). Germinated seeds were visually checked every day and \"normal\" and \"abnormal seedlings\" were counted by experienced lab technicians, meaning those that showed or did not show potential for continued development into satisfactory plants when grown in good soil under optimum conditions [30]. After 7 days, seeds that did not germinate were dissected longitudinally through the embryo and soaked in a 1% tetrazolium solution at 30 • C for 120 min as described by Warham et al. [30]. Through observation with an optical microscope, a seed is considered viable when at least 1/3 of the scutellum as well as the radicle are red-stained. The percentages of non-germinated viable and non-germinated non-viable seeds were determined with the counting of viable and non-viable seeds. All seed germination parameters (normal seedlings, abnormal seedlings, germination, nongerminated viable seeds, non-germinated non-viable seeds) were expressed as a percentage of all fifty seeds tested.Statistical analyses of data collected were performed using R version 4.0.3. Data were first summarized as means and standard deviations. For the count data (numbers of live S. zeamais, P. truncatus and S. cerealella), a 95% Poisson confidence interval of the mean was estimated using the R package (\"DescTools\").Beta regression was used to evaluate the effect of storage technologies, maize varieties, storage time, and their interactions on moisture content, percentage of insect damage, and weight loss, as well as to gauge the effect of storage technology, maize variety, storage time, seed treatment, number of days before the germination assay, and their interactions on the percentages of normal seedlings and abnormal seedlings [31]. All beta regressions were performed with the R package \"mgcv\" using the logit link as a link function. The parameters \"storage technology\", \"maize variety\", \"storage time\", and \"seed treatment\" were considered as factors. The reference factors considered for each model were the \"polypropylene woven bag\" for storage technology, which is the common farmer practice; \"Magdalena Texcoco\" for maize variety, with white landraces being the area's most popular maize variety; \"three months of storage\" for storage time and parameter, given that farmers store their harvests for at least three months [10]; and \"no percussion\" for the seed treatment parameter. Only two-way interactions have been considered within regression models to facilitate interpretation.Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the R package \"FactoMineR\" to evaluate relationships between postharvest parameters, including kernel moisture content and temperature at the end of the storage period, percentages of insect damage and kernels without damage, weight loss, numbers of live S. zeamais, live P. truncatus and live S. cerealella, and seed germination parameters (percentages of germination, normal seedlings, abnormal seedlings, non-germinated viable seeds, non-germinated non-viable seeds). Only final values for these parameters after 3 and 6 months of storage were used for the PCA.The main species of live insect counted was P. truncatus, followed by S. zeamais and S. cerealella. The highest numbers of insects were found in samples from the polypropylene woven bags, particularly after six months of storage. Magdalena and VC Rosado were the most highly infested maize varieties, particularly by P. truncatus, which was the most encountered living insect (Figure 1). The number of live insects of the three pest species in seed stored using hermetic containers varied between 0 and 2 insects per 500 g of seed, as shown by the 95% Poisson confidence intervals (Figure 1). In contrast, confidence intervals for seed stored using polypropylene woven bags were highly variable and depended on the maize variety and storage time. The upper estimates of the confidence intervals were as high as 9.5, 277.9, and 3.4 insects per 500 g of seed for S. zeamais, P. truncatus and S. cerealella, respectively (Figure 1).Kernel moisture content overall varied between 8.4 and 13.4% (Table 2). There were fluctuations between initial and final moisture content regardless of the storage technologies, particularly after six months of storage. Insect damage varied between 0.6 and 61.4%, while weight loss ranged from 0.2 to 20.1%, with heavy damage on kernels stored in polypropylene woven bags. Independently of the variety, insect damage was particularly severe after 6 months of storage and up to 14 times higher than after 3 months (and an average increase from 12.9 to 51.9% for polypropylene woven bags, with that increase in storage time). However, VC Amarillo, the variety with a hard endosperm, had the lowest insect damage and weight loss values after six months of storage using polypropylene woven bags while the most infested landraces were VC Rosado and SJR Azul. Kernel damage was particularly low with samples stored using hermetic technologies, whatever the variety or storage time, with weight losses from 0.2 to 1.2% and the same trend for insect damage. Hermetic storage minimized weight losses, whereas high weight losses occurred with polypropylene woven bags for all landraces, and particularly after 6 months of storage. Kernel moisture content overall varied between 8.4 and 13.4% (Table 2). There were fluctuations between initial and final moisture content regardless of the storage technologies, particularly after six months of storage. Insect damage varied between 0.6 and 61.4%, while weight loss ranged from 0.2 to 20.1%, with heavy damage on kernels stored in polypropylene woven bags. Independently of the variety, insect damage was particularly severe after 6 months of storage and up to 14 times higher than after 3 months (and an average increase from 12.9 to 51.9% for polypropylene woven bags, with that increase in storage time). However, VC Amarillo, the variety with a hard endosperm, had the lowest insect damage and weight loss values after six months of storage using polypropylene woven bags while the most infested landraces were VC Rosado and SJR Azul. Kernel damage was particularly low with samples stored using hermetic technologies, whatever the variety or storage time, with weight losses from 0.2 to 1.2% and the same trend for Percentages of normal seedlings after 3 and 6 months of storage 1 day after opening the containers varied between 6.7 and 87.7%, while percentages of abnormal seedlings varied between 11.3 and 86.0% (Table 3), with these two parameters presenting opposite trends and a significant effect of variety. In some cases, the percentages of normal seedlings after storage were higher in comparison with the initial values. Overall, increasing storage time from 3 to 6 months had a negative impact on the percentage of normal seedlings (and the opposite for the percentage of abnormal seedlings). However, storing seed in hermetic containers positively impacted the percentage of normal seedlings after 6 months of storage, compared to storage using polypropylene woven bags (Table 3). Overall, applying percussion as a seed treatment did not have a significant effect (Table 3), but applying it after 6 months of storage seemed to have a negative impact on the percentage of normal seedlings. Delaying germination and aerating seed for 3, 7 or 15 days did not significantly affect the percentage of normal and abnormal seedlings (Supplementary Table S1). The percentages of non-germinated viable seeds and non-germinated non-viable seeds were very low, except in two cases when percussion was applied for grain stored using polypropylene woven bags (Supplementary Table S1). In general, post-storage seed germination rates were high (average > 90%) for all the storage technologies and maize landraces, regardless of seed treatment (Supplementary Table S1). The PCA identified three components with eigenvalues > 1. The first two principal components accounted for 66% of the total variability in results (Supplementary Table S2). The first component, which explained 48% of the total variability, was highly and positively correlated with insect damage, weight loss, and final numbers of live S. zeamais, P. truncatus, and S. cerealella. The first component was negatively correlated with percentage of germination. The second component, which represented 18% of the total variability, was positively correlated with percentage of normal seedlings and kernel temperature, and negatively correlated with percentage of abnormal seedlings (Supplementary Table S2). The number of live S. zeamais, weight loss, and the number of live P. truncatus are the parameters that contributed most to the first component, while percentages of normal and abnormal seedlings are the ones that contributed mainly to the second component (Supplementary Table S2). Overall, the loading plot of variables used for the PCA, using the first two components (Figure 2), showed that postharvest loss parameters contributed the most to component 1, while germination parameters contributed mainly to component 2. The loading plot also highlighted a close association between postharvest loss parameters and the percentage of non-germinated viable seeds. Smallholder farmers in Mexico actively participate in the preservation of maize seed biodiversity through community seed banks [5,8,32]. Hermetic technologies can contribute to seed preservation by protecting the seed during the storage period. This study evaluated the effect of hermetic technologies on postharvest loss parameters and seed germination.There was little variation in kernel moisture content across storage technologies or storage periods, though some significant increases and decreases were observed, particularly after six months of storage. Overall, kernels stored in either hermetic bags or sealed plastic containers had lower moisture content variation than those stored in polypropylene woven bags. These results are similar to those from other experiments in the State of Mexico published by García-Lara et al. [33], who reported an increase in grain moisture content stored using polypropylene sacks. The same results have also been reported for experiments elsewhere [34,35]. These changes are associated with environmental humidity and the failure of polypropylene woven bags to protect grain from external conditions, potentially increasing moisture content or drying stored grain, depending on the environment [36]. The fluctuations in moisture content noticed in hermetic bags, particularly after six months of storage were reported by other authors [24,37] and could be explained by ambient air leaking into the system. Hermetic bags are not perfectly \"impermeable\" and the sealing system (a zip system) of the storage containers could also have an impact on oxygen and moisture fluctuations within the technologies [38]. Fluctuations of moisture content could also be explained by the perforation of bags by insects, particularly P. truncatus, and/or biological activity inside the containers that may lead to condensation due to temperature variation outside the containers [13]. The perforation of hermetic bags by bruchids has been reported in experiments carried out elsewhere [39][40][41] even though the impact on insect damage was not significant. Overall, hermetic technologies with low-permeability barriers help to limit insect damage in comparison with non-hermetic technologies.Samples stored in polypropylene woven bags were highly infested during storage, resulting in high levels of insect damage and weight loss, confirming previous findings for this region of Mexico [10,33]. Storage losses were due to the activities of the main pests, particularly P. truncatus, and favored by the availability of oxygen. However, VC Amarillo, the landrace with the hardest endosperm, seemed less infested by insects. The incidence of these pests in grain inside polypropylene woven bags depends on the landraces and their characteristics, including composition, kernel hardness and vitreousness, and pericarp thickness [42]. The endosperm characteristics are not the only mechanism involved in the resistance to storage insect pests. Previous studies have reported that maize resistance to postharvest insect pests is related to phenolic contents [43,44]. Maize kernel resistance to postharvest pests is based on complex interactions between anatomical, biochemical and genetic factors, and includes antibiosis and antixenosis (physical barriers and phytochemical repellents) effects [42]. Some Mexican landraces, particularly the ones of yellow, blue and pink colors, are known for their high polyphenol and anthocyanins contents [45]. These landraces with high resistance to the main postharvest pests have been identified and could be used to develop improved varieties [46]. However, since farmers' selection of maize varieties also depends on their home consumption strategies [6], it is important to find other strategies to avoid losses during storage. Hermetic technologies, including low-cost alternatives such as recycled containers, e.g., plastic bottles and barrels, minimize insect infestations and weight loss regardless of maize variety in smallholders' farming systems [10].As highlighted by the PCA, there was a negative relationship between increased postharvest loss (high percentage of insect damage, weight loss, and high numbers of live insects) and seed germination. However, post-storage germination data of the pest-free samples stored in polypropylene woven bags were very high, and there was no significant effect of maize variety, storage technology, or storage time. Similar results were found by Odjo et al. [14], who reported high percentages of germination of seed stored using non-hermetic technologies in temperate conditions (>2000 masl). These results could be ascribed to environment, including low relative humidity and ambient temperature [10]. As per Harrington [21], storage conditions including low temperatures and low relative humidity strongly favor increased seed longevity. However, storage in polypropylene woven bags resulted in a loss of seed quantity, as demonstrated by the percentage of insect damage and weight loss recorded, so polypropylene woven bags are not a viable storage strategy for seed biodiversity preservation. Hermetic storage had no detrimental effects on the percentage of germination and applying percussion or delaying the germination assay did not significantly improve it. These results corroborate the findings of García-Lara et al. [33] and Odjo et al. [14] in the central highlands of Mexico and experiments elsewhere [34,[47][48][49]. Hermetic technologies preserve the percentage of seed germination by limiting oxygen availability and maintaining low-equilibrium relative humidity for stored seed, which in turn slows oxidative reactions associated with decreased seed viability [50]. These results are valid over an extended storage time (up to 7 months), as demonstrated by Kuyu et al. [25]. Regarding special treatments, percussion treatments in this study tended to reduce the percentage of normal seedlings. No special treatments were required for a satisfactory germination rate in the case of the maize varieties studied.A decreased germination rate for seed stored using hermetic technologies has been reported and may be associated with the conditions of germination assays, particularly seed moisture content [19,20,51]. Singano et al. [51] reported a low percentage of seed germination (less than 15%) for samples stored using hermetic technologies and associated with high temperatures and moisture content and the airtight conditions. Water availability in hermetic storage can provoke fermentation in the seed, decreasing viability [52]. Seed moisture content at storage in the current study was below 13%, explaining the high germination recorded, and the data presented here confirm that storing dry seed in hermetically sealed containers will not adversely affect seed germination.The percentages of normal seedlings reported in the current study were low. Landraces are generally selected by farmers in Mexico based on ear corn and kernel characteristics for culinary qualities and cultural purposes [1,6]. Participatory breeding programs considering farmers' preferences could help in improving landraces' seed quality and overall productivity, and enhance their in situ conservation [5]. The percentage of normal seedlings for initial samples frozen at −18 • C were sometimes lower than normal seedling values obtained after storage, suggesting freezing injury. This phenomenon has already been described during the storage of high-moisture-content seeds (>15%) [50]. The results presented in the current study suggest that freezing injury could still happen at moisture contents between 10.0 and 12.6% (the moisture contents of the initial materials). Data on the effect of freezing on Mexican seed landraces quality is, however, scarce, and this warrants further investigation. A decrease in the percentage of normal seedlings of seed stored in hermetic containers was sometimes observed and, overall, storage time also had a negative effect on the percentage of normal seedlings. These results are unexpected and contrast with hybrid seeds' germination results from the same area presented by Odjo et al. [14]. This could be associated with seed moisture content, and the results presented in the current study suggest that an additional decrease in moisture content for the landraces studied is required. Seed preservation standards generally recommend drying seed to a critical moisture content below which desiccation injury could occur [53]. According to the results of Bakhtavar et al. [54], only seed with 8% moisture content stored in hermetic containers maintained a satisfactory germination level. Adsorption isotherm studies of these landraces could help to establish the best conditions for their storage. Overall, seed drying, a key preparation prior to storage in hermetic conditions, is important but could be challenging for smallholders, particularly in the highlands or during rainy seasons [55]. Sun drying, particularly at hot times of day, can also reduce seed germination. Low-cost seed dryers or shade drying can be used without detrimental effects on germination [56]. Solutions such as zeolite drying are also safer alternatives that can maintain maize seeds' high viability during storage. These drying solutions combined with the dry chain strategy have been promoted for Guatemala's community seed reserves to preserve seed viability [57].In the case of maize stored for use as seed by smallholder farmers, hermetic technologies can limit damage by postharvest insect pests and minimize storage loss. Quantitative damage was much higher with polypropylene woven bags with high infestation levels of S. zeamais and P. truncatus. Using hermetic technologies, including recycled storage containers such as plastic bottles, did not significantly affect germination rate, and there was no need for additional seed treatments to increase the percentage of germination. These technologies could be promoted for smallholder farmers in Mexico with the appropriate technical support, including properly drying seeds before storage. Facilitating the physical and economical access of smallholders to these technologies and practices so that they can dry and store seed in safe conditions is critical to preserve their seed biodiversity and strength their food security.The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects13100878/s1, Table S1: Effect of storage technologies on the percentage of abnormal seedlings, non germinated viable seeds and non germinated non-viable seeds, determined by germination tests after three and six months of storage; Table S2: Eigenvalues, proportions and cumulative proportions obtained with the principal component analysis; variable correlation and contribution to the principal component. Funding: CIMMYT implemented this study as part of the Project \"MasAgro Productor/Cultivos para México\" funded by Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (SADER). This work is also part of the One-CGIAR initiative AgriLAC with support from W1&W2 donors, including national governments, foundations, development banks, and other public and private agencies. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the donors mentioned previously.Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0036833508.json b/main/part_2/0036833508.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c25789b13576ce33239ce5af4eb148022c3cf6a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0036833508.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"bcadeb28fd1d21e7be91aa75f811d4ab","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5511eb84-d327-4300-9dae-c0566688ec5b/retrieve","id":"-1115647567"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7b1643f8-da6d-43ce-87ac-16ca8c9d87fd","content":"system., rangelands are \"land on which the indigenous vegetation is predominantly grasses, grass-like plants, forbs 1 or shrubs that are grazed or have the potential to be grazed, and which is used as a natural ecosystem for the production of grazing livestock and wildlife\" (Allen et al., 2011). As an ecological term, rangelands can include annual and perennial grasslands, shrub and dry woodlands, savannah, tundra, and desert., rangelands refer to the management unit of extensive livestock keepers. In this sense, rangelands can include a wider variety of ecosystems and other resource zones, such as forest, wetlands, and ecosystems that might be used only occasionally but may be critical for the survival of the whole system and the livelihoods it supports (Davies et al., 2015).The Rangelands Atlas, published in 2020, includes seven of fourteen 1 used in biology and in vegetation ecology, especially in relation to grasslands and understory. 2 . Rangelands are found mainly in arid and semi-arid regions, but are also found in less dry regions. They are dominated by herbaceous vegetation and include important woody biomass.Rangelands produce a wide variety of goods and services, including livestock forage, water, wildlife habitat, wood products, mineral resources, recreation space, and natural beauty. The people living in rangelands include pastoralists, agropastoralists, crop farmers and other groups who depend on natural resources for their livelihoods. Many rangeland societies are highly adapted to their environment and the cultures of the people living there are a part of our rich global heritage.Rangelands are home to one-third of the which are threatened. Rangelands store around one-third of all landbased carbon, with a large proportion below ground, including an unusually high proportion in the root-mass of rangeland plants. Onerangelands. Due to the scarcity of water in rangelands, water ecosystem et al., 2015). considered degraded, with some regions more heavily affected than others. Rangelands are affected by conversion of land to uses such as crop farming, and by land degradation through over-exploitation, for Rangelands are increasingly affected by anthropogenic climate change. Drivers of rangeland degradation include a growing human population, increased investment that drives over-exploitation, unsustainable management practices, gaps in policy that undermine traditional management practices, the widespread misunderstanding of rangeland ecology, and the adaptations that rangeland communities have made to local conditions. These adaptations include complex communal land management systems and herd mobility that have evolved over centuries.Rangeland management depends on applying knowledge of rangeland ecology such as using grazing management and other interventions to stimulate growth of desired plant species and to inhibit growth of undesirable species. A good understanding of rangeland ecology is therefore necessary to manage rangelands sustainably. For example, it is vital to understand the close relationship between grasses and grazers. Many grasses are highly adapted to the habits of grasses are out-competed by less well-adapted plants in the absence of grazing. Without grazing livestock, the existing ecological community will shift away from grasses toward increased woody vegetation.The two major risks to rangeland ecosystems are over-grazing and under-grazing.occurs when plants are exposed to intensive grazing for Over-grazing reduces the usefulness, productivity, and biodiversity of means permitting the growth, quality or species Both terms are poorly understood, and this confusion contributes to land degradation. The term over-grazing is usually taken to mean the intensity of animal grazing, most often associated with the number of animals or stocking density. In fact, it is the timing of grazing as much as the total stocking density that is most likely to determine the health of a rangeland area. The management response is critical. Reducing the number of animals can be detrimental if no consideration is given to the health.resources, including soils, water, animals and plants, for the production of goods to meet changing human needs, while simultaneously ensuring the long-term productive potential of these resources and the maintenance of their environmental functions\" (UN Earth Summit, 1992). Sustainable rangeland management (SRM), in simple terms, is the management of rangelands to meet current human needs while ensuring their long-term productivity. Human needs vary across rangelands, hence, different management objectives are needed. For example, rangelands may be managed mainly for livestock production, for wildlife protection, or to protect a watershed. Although management often focuses on one objective as and sustainable management means ensuring an appropriate balance of ecosystem services.SRM plays a vital role in stopping, slowing, or reversing rangeland SRM practices are often promoted to reverse land degradation and restore or rehabilitate degraded lands, are guided by the management objectives of the users, and recognizes that different users may have different views on sustainability, and therefore rangeland degradation can be subjective. Sustainable management has to consider the production of a wide range of services both now and in the future, and promoting one service at the expense of others.To maintain and improve rangelands productivity, it is important to understand how they respond to ongoing environmental changes and anthropogenic pressure. This knowledge can guide conservation and restoration efforts in dryland rangelands, as biotic factors can be actively managed at the local scale to increase ecosystem resilience to global changes (Safriel, 2009).Before addressing rangeland management practices, it is often degradation. In particular, it is frequently necessary to address the decline in effective rangelands governance. In many countries, this requires a change in perceptions of pastoral herding practices, increased understanding of rangeland ecology, and an overall improvement in dialogue and trust between governments, other development actors, and rangeland pastoral communities. Above all, an increased recognition of the essential relationship between rangeland health and grazing management is urgently needed, together with the legitimization of herd mobility as a management tool.The primary rangeland managers in most countries are livestock keepers, often called pastoralists. Many pastoralists have a deep knowledge of rangeland ecosystems and effective herd management practices. This indigenous knowledge is a valuable asset in rangeland restoration. Although pastoralists are usually blamed for rangeland degradation, they often face many constraints in applying their management knowledge.Restoring effective management practices therefore requires addressing these underlying causes and constraints. This includes strengthening the representation of pastoralists in policy and investment dialogues in many countries.Despite technical advances, the scale of rangeland rehabilitation intervention is still small and lacks a holistic approach. Most projects focus on a single SRM practice, ignoring the myriad possible interventions that would guarantee achieving the desired rehabilitation status. This toolkit brings together current state-of-the-art knowledge about SRM practices known to contribute to sustainable rangeland management. Successfully applying these methods, tools, and approaches requires they be used together with improved rangeland assessment and monitoring and better data on rangeland ecosystem services. It also requires attention to policy gaps and failures, including legislation on communal tenure rights. Sustainable rangeland management ultimately requires a major increase in investment, which requires a deeper understanding of investment opportunities and the values of ecosystem goods and services.Participatory approaches -such as Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) -are a collection of approaches used by development actors to incorporate the knowledge and opinions of rural people in the planning and management of development projects and programs. Participatory approaches are typically used to improve decision-making, foster ownership by local communities, and enhance accountability in development projects. Participatory approaches are a process of empowering communities, or groups within these communities, and are central to natural resource governance in development context.Participatory Rangeland Management and Planning (PRMP) provides a framework for adapting participatory approaches to the unique context of rangelands. PRMP takes into consideration the spatial scale on which rangelands are managed, the diversity of stakeholders involved, and seasonal patterns of movement and resource use. The large scale on which rangeland landscapes are managed is a major challenge for coordination and necessitates participation on a similarly large geographic scale. PRMP provides the most effective framework of engagement considering the socioeconomic and natural resource dynamics.-4567589:;)<=)-!2-)Many participatory approaches exist and PRMP adheres to principles that are common to most of these approaches, including:that recognizes contested claims and aspirations for a given rangeland landscape and ensures different socio-economic, ethnic and other groups are engaged in relevant dialogue• in which stakeholders express their needs, wants, and interests and reach a consensus on future rangeland use and management that respects the values of all usersin which all stakeholders are represented and engaged in the relevant dialogue, planning and implementationand integrating or reconciling local• that builds on the current state of rangeland resource to provide a foundation for managing in futurewith a focus on developing action plans that shape how agreed strategic interventions will be implementedusing participatory tools to monitor and evaluate actions and to adapt management according to emerging lessons./#(-/)$&)-\"!#$.$-\"#%!3)!\"&+('\"&,)Many participatory tools can be adapted for rangeland management of the participatory process to ensure the approach is aligned to the unique conditions of the rangelands. The following guidance is organized to other participatory planning frameworks. />:8)?@)-A4>6:4;B58)CD59E56F)A6E);>AG:B<9E:4) :6FAF:H:6>Rangelands are social-ecological systems, often with a great diversity of resource users and rights-holders. Sometimes these stakeholders are absent seasonally or for long periods. Rangelands often fall through institutional and policy gaps as there may be several institutions with overlapping responsibilities for rangelands. Important consideration for stakeholder analysis should therefore include:1. involved in rangeland use and management, including communities (e.g. herders, crop farmers and others), women and youth as well as men, migrant labourers, and marginalized groups within pastoral societies, as well as relevant public institutions 2. Preliminary dialogue with stakeholders to agree on the challenge to be addressed and the scale of rangeland landscape for action.questions to address include:PRMP requires particular attention to include the , including indigenous peoples, women and youth. Women have unique responsibilities over rangeland resources and unique knowledge on their sustainable use and management. However, women are largely marginalised in many rangeland societies. Extra effort and attention needs to be made to ensure fair and meaningful participation. It is common to separate groups of men and women while conducting participatory needed to engage women of other groups.partners to ensure that relevant groups have not been excluded and to identify differences of opinion between stakeholder groups over their perception of rights and responsibilities over natural resources. This is a sensitive process, requiring local knowledge and cultural sensitivity to draw out disagreements that are likely to require future negotiations./>:8)I@)/5>DA>5<6)A6E)7<6>:J>)A6A9K;5;In Step 2, the characteristics of the rangeland landscape can be clearly described to capture the spatial scale and the variety of resources and rights holders. Rangeland landscapes are often managed on a large scale and people and institutions introducing localized interventions must be aware of their impact on larger scales, for example on a communal tenure system or a river basin.The situation analysis should include baseline studies to review relevant information to establish state and trends of rangeland health, policies and institutions. Large-scale assessment of rangeland can be accomplished through remote sensing. Step 2 allows the scale of landscape management to be determined, and guides planning under Step 3. As part of the preparation activities, a baseline analysis is required to provide the context and the situation of the area where participatory mapping will be conducted. The baseline study describes the environmental and socio-economic conditions. This should combine information from both published and non-published literature. Information gathered should also cover the interconnectivity between the landscape at which planning is taking place in relation to the wider landscape. This will mainly depend on the target landscape for planning and the availability of money and time. Analysis of the baseline conditions could include biophysical conditions, socio-economic conditions, and the social and political context.Additional data such as topographic maps, climate data, and indicators of land productivity are outputs for this process. This will involve collecting and organizing existing remote sensing imagery on the selected landscape to produce an overview map on the status of rangeland health, using the maps generated to assess and understand the baseline condition of rangeland resources at a landscape level before participatory mapping, and, if resources are available, engage landscape maps during participatory mapping (FAO and IUCN, 2015)./>:8)L@)2A8856F)A6E)89A6656FNatural resource mapping is the cornerstone of participatory approaches and it is vital for effective rangelands management. However, the mapping process needs to be approached with an open mind, to learn from the way stakeholders mentally map their landscapes, and to ensure that pre-determined notions of scale and boundaries do not restrict local knowledge and understanding.Participatory tools have generally been developed for use at the village level, whereas a rangeland management unit may be many thousands of square kilometers, with rights shared by thousands of households. The stakeholders involved in participatory mapping must ensure clear accountability,and representation and differentiated rights and responsibilities must be accommodated across the entire landscape. This includes seasonal rights and responsibilities of some user communities as well as seasonally-differentiated gender roles. One solution is to involve well-informed and credible representatives of the key stakeholder groups, and ensure that they feedback on their involvement to the people they represent.Participatory mapping can be improved by deliberately involving local community experts. This selection should consider the diversity expertise, knowledge, responsibility, rights and gender, including women and youths. The representatives should be conversant with their rangeland production system(s) and should be able to contribute to the mapping by sharing their experiences about the state, use and management and trends of their rangeland resources. They bring along important knowledge on the social, environmental and rangeland use dynamics.Participatory mapping follows these steps:Overlaying handdrawn features on to a high-resolution map can help when digitizing information. Careful attention should be given to the complex spatial arrangements of rangeland governance.(e.g. 10 years hence): This vision can consensus on a desirable scenario for the rangelands from an ecological, productive and local governance perspective. The future vision should be guided by a combination of local knowledge and rangelands. This step can be combined with information gathered earlier through a rangeland health assessment. The visioning map provides the basis for identifying indicators to assess change in rangeland health and for identifying the type of rangeland governance desired by the range-users.Action planning should be made particularly sensitive to gender roles and responsibilities as well as seasonal resource rights. Action plans should the transformation pathway to move from the current status of the rangeland to the envisioned future, outlining the detail of responsibility, resources and how progress will be measured.1 Detailed guidance for strengthening governance can be found in the manual \"Improving Governance of Pastoral Lands\": http://www.fao.org/3/i5771e/i5771e.pdf:resource governance and land rights (particularly management rights). Participatory planning is an important preliminary step in understanding governance. The mapping exercise determines the rights and responsibilities of stakeholders over different rangeland resources. Steps for strengthening governance should be included as a sub-set of the Action Plan above, but a detailed discussion is needed to identify the acceptable measures for strengthening governance and rights. There should be clear description of what the best possible governance structure is expected to look like in the given context. Attention should be paid to the rights of women and other groups within society. Participants should consider the following questions 1 :• Who are the rights holders over different resources (e.g. access rights, use rights, management rights, right of alienation etc.)? • (e.g. customary, formal legal, constitutional)? • What measures -both formal and informal -can stakeholders take to strengthen their management rights over each resource?/>:8)M@)2<65><456F)A6E):NA9DA>5<6 of actions, measuring the impact of those actions on rangeland health and socioeconomics, and responding to a dynamic setting. Participatory changes in rangeland health, and evaluation of implementation of actions. Regular annual stakeholder meetings should be held to discuss progress in management and changes in resource conditions taking into consideration the short-term and long-term variability and projected future dynamics. Stakeholder meetings are ideally conducted by a community organization, and can be part of their annual planning cycle.Those organizations can develop their capacity to play a coordinating role in rangeland management, sometimes acting as a hybrid institution that includes both customary leaders and non-customary leaders.Monitoring and evaluating change in rangeland governance also requires evaluating changes in governance institutions, which is a sensitive task requiring careful analysis from community members. It can include monitoring policies, rules, and institutional arrangements and processes, as well as decisions made informally and implemented by the community. The effectiveness of the governance systems should be assessed in relation to resource use and management. One useful experienced by community members, through stakeholder stories and focus groups.What was planned (maps and plans developed during the first planning exercises)?What was achieved (review maps and plans originally developed by communities)?What was not achieved?Why was intended change not achieved?What will be done to address this?What are the revised targets (e.g. for the next 6 months or 12 months)?to the conservation of natural resources and has been used in the Arabian Peninsula for more than 1,500 years. The hima system has a set of guiding principles, is participatory in nature, and uses community knowledge and practices in setting up and managing protected areas. Implementing a hima system requires consideration of the land tenure system in place, the biodiversity on the site, and the socioeconomic and cultural context of the community. The hima system is a proven governance approach that allows land users to implement actions that preserve natural resources, conserve ecosystems, restore biodiversity, and support local communities. Pastoralists from other regions often practice analogues to hima.Access to a hima was forbidden by the individual or group that owned it.Later, its meaning evolved to signify a reserved pasture, a piece of land set aside seasonally to allow regeneration. The hima system is inclusive and designed to preserve and protect ecosystems for the sustainable use of resources by the people and for the people, while taking into account the social and cultural practices of the communities involved.The fall of the Ottoman Empire at the end of the 1800s resulted in more control by smaller states that emerged in the region. During the twentieth century, political and socioeconomic changes in the Arab region led to the weakening of the hima system, exposing the environment to a multitude of anthropogenic transformations resulting in widespread degradation. Tribal land was nationalized and increased demand for export products led to the abuse of natural systems. Sustainable systems of land use and management declined and so did the diversity and health of habitats. Recent years have witnessed several campaigns to conserve nature and its resources, including a revival of the hima concept.The value of the hima approach lies in its ability to integrate food production with conservation goals. Protected areas often exclude local users and thereby miss out on important opportunities for tapping their local knowledge and the institutions that enable its use. The hima approach legitimizes Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas 1 as a way to achieve both sustainable land management and biodiversity conservation on land used primarily for food production. Healthy, productive rangelands offer a genuine win for agricultural production through livestock and biodiversity conservation. The hima model provides a key to unlock this potential by improving landscape connectivity and harnessing the role of domestic herbivores for ecosystem management.the hima approach, but in the context of rangeland restoration the main focus is on Category VI: Protected area with sustainable use of natural resources (Dudley et al. 2013).2:A;D4:;)A6E);>:8;)><):;>AC95;B)A)B5HA b e c o n s t i t u t e d b y a l e g i t i m a t e g o v e r n i n g a u t h o r i t y , be established to improve public welfare, not cause undue hardship to local people and not deprive them of resources they need for their subsistence, and realize more benefits for society than detriments.for restoring rangelands and reviving hima is to address social rather than technological constraints. Reviving hima is therefore a process rather than an action and while it is highly costeffective, it is also highly demanding of skills, particularly skills for negotiation, participation, and consensus building. Reviving hima requires extensive dialogue between communities, government, and other stakeholders to reach agreement over policies and shared governance of natural resources at local, national, and regional level.is typically carried out through participatory planning, beginning with a complete stakeholder analysis and rights, it is important that all stakeholder groups, and particularly women and marginalized groups, are involved in planning. Additional effort is often needed to build capacity of marginalized groups so they can participate on an equal footing with other community members. From the outset, the primary focus of the hima approach should be to empower local communities, identify and respond to their needs, and ensure their full ownership in the hima process and the actual hima site.It is highly recommended to embed the development of a hima in wider landscape restoration planning, given the communal nature of rangeland resources and the potential for off-site impacts (both costs will mean periods of rest and recovery when livestock will need to be moved to other areas. Maintaining connectivity between the hima site and the rest of the landscape, and between multiple himas within the same landscape will facilitate effective herd management. Participatory groups of resource users and rights-holders.Training on hima approaches, sustainable land management, community governance, and legal options for formalizing the hima.Preparatory meetings with local authorities to ensure political support for the process.Hima site identification within the landscape, including mapping and site visits.Development of a hima management plan, including livestock management arrangements, environmental and biodiversity management considerations, land rehabilitation options, and a monitoring plan.Agreements for legal documents, community practices or bylaws depending on the legal context and options to formalize the hima.Development of associated incentives such as livelihoods development options for hima communities.Detailed stakeholder analysis and participatory planning at landscape scale. Strengthen land stewardship and communal tenure.Create an enabling environment of policy and institutional support and address the cross-sectoral nature of hima.Strengthen community organizations for hima governance.Ensure that hima management is aware of and sensitive to the socio-ecological landscape within which it is situated.Build capacity and awareness in public institutions and communities, with a particular focus on the skills of participation, empowerment, and monitoring.Develop incentives and rewards for the multiple and diverse benefits of hima.Strengthen scientific and economic evidence and local knowledge to provide systematic monitoring for quality assurance. Water scarcity is among the main problems to be faced by several countries around the world as demand for domestic, agricultural, industrial, and environmental uses continues to increase (Khanal et al., 2020). Socioeconomic development, technological innovation, and environmental degradation, particularly climate change, are further intensifying the pressure of global water shortages (Wu et al., 2020).Climate change is one of the main factors affecting the availability of water resources (Haque et al., 2015). Climate change is predicted to cause a high climatic variability in semi-arid environments, leading to an increase in the frequency of droughts and heavy rainfall events (IPCC, 2012). When there is a high rainfall event on steep land and on soils water crisis is projected to worsen due to population explosion and the higher food demand (De Fries and Rosenzweig, 2010). The growing population and the increasing demand for agricultural products are putting pressure on limited grazing and rangeland resources, especially in arid environments.Many rangelands are found in arid and semi-arid lands where biomass production is constrained by moisture availability. Furthermore, when these lands are affected by land degradation, the soil moisture content often declines, due to reduced capacity to hold moisture as well as to biomass production in rangeland ecosystems. This means that production is possible only when additional water is made available for cultivation. With water scarcity placing heavy pressure in many arid regions, alternative methods, such as soil and water conservation, are of paramount importance in recent decades. Water harvesting is one such technology and is based on the direct collection of rainwater, which can be stored for direct consumption or can be recharged into the groundwater (Khanal et al., 2020). Numerous countries have supported the implementation of such practice to overcome the water demand harvesting can be carried out for multiple purposes, including to provide domestic water, water for livestock, and water to enable restoration. The most suitable water harvesting technology will depend on the purpose of harvesting as well as the biophysical properties of the location.In addition to water scarcity, arid environments face challenges sustaining or raising production levels without effective management interventions.Water harvesting in rangelands can help increase the production of forage shrubs and herbs, followed by a more general improvement in soil fertility and may be the most feasible option for raising productivity for these large areas. Distribution of water is an important consideration when managing the access and use of rangeland sites. Water harvesting that accounts for forage use within and between different growing seasons can support livestock that contribute to maintaining of water resources has been strongly associated with the degradation of rangelands because animals tend to overgraze around watering holes.of surface water. In arid areas, 70-80% of rainwater falling early in the the available nutrients in the form of organic matter. Thus, it is important to capture and preserve it through various manually constructed structures.In arid areas, most rain falls occur during a short period, and sometimes even then only sparsely. Thus, the water must be collected when available.As water scarcity increases with increasing population, conserving and harvesting water is critical in arid environments. Degraded soils are germinated seeds from emerging. #B:4:)A4:)>B4::)C5<8BK;57A9) 7;)56)A99)SA>:4)BA4N:;>56F) ;K;>:H;@• Play a vital role in supporting the rural population in water-scarce areas.• Facilitate vegetation production in areas that would otherwise lie fallow due to lack of water. • Improve water availability for livestock. The water harvesting structure cistern is the best option for storing rainwater for livestock watering. • Improve soil fertility as runoff water contains silt, manure, and organic matter. • Reduce soil erosion and siltation downstream.• Enhance soil moisture and also prolong the wetting and softening of crusted soil surfaces, allowing seeds to germinate and emerge.• Increase seedling survival for the most drought-sensitive species.• Capture atmospheric carbon dioxide through increasing biomass production. • Reduce the use of groundwater, which is a valuable water source and needs energy for its exploitation. • Contribute to the recharge of groundwater tables.A variety of surface structures have been used, but earthen dykes, berms, bunds, and dams are popular because of their simplicity, effectiveness, and relatively low cost of installation and maintenance.!\"##$%&'()\"*(+%'\")(,*)\"#-$>)5;)5H8<4>A6>)><)D6E:4;>A6E)>B:) 7BA4A7>:45;>57;)<=):A7B);>4D7>D4:T);D7B) A;)5>;@The catchment area that receives rainfall and channels runoff downstream. Catchments can vary in size.moves the water from the roof surface to the storage. Field conditions such as slope, soil properties, land use and land cover need to be assessed before choosing and constructing a structure..4D7>D4:;)A6E)>B:54)7BA4A7>:45;>57;)A4:)E:;745C:E)56) #AC9:)?UIdeal for gentle slopes and low hills with 300 mm mean annual rainfall. Based on a catchment area of 500 m 2 , supplying additional water to a series of downstream plots enclosed by small earth bunds (about 20 cm) and connected by spillways for discharging excess water. Meskat systems are often used for watering trees.Meskat micro catchment System (Ahmed, 2003).Diamond-shaped basins surrounded by small earth bunds with an infiltration pit in the lowest corner of each. Runoff is collected from within the basin and stored in the infiltration pit. Micro catchments are mainly used for growing trees or bushes.This technique is appropriate for small-scale tree planting in any area which has a moisture deficit.Besides harvesting water for the trees, it simultaneously conserves soil.Nigarim micro catchment System for trees (Critchley et al., 2013).Trapezoidal shaped earth bunds capturing runoff from external catchment and overflowing around wingtips. This technique is used to enclose larger areas (up to 1 ha) and to impound larger quantities of runoff which is harvested from an external or \"long slope\" catchment.Trapezoidal Bunds for crops (Critchley and Reij, 1989).Constructed with stones along the contours of slopes with a 2-5% gradient. Bund height should be 65 cm with a base width of 80-100 cm and a shallow trench on the upper side 15-30 cm deep to trap runoff and sediment.Photo: Critchely and Siegert, 1991.Made of soil or stone, diameter of 1-7 m and 50 cm high, tips are set on the contour line facing upslope. Slopes up to 20% in areas with rainfall as low as 100-150 mm per annum. Soils should be at least 1.5 m but preferably 2 m deep. Photo: Mounir Louhaichi Natural or (hand) dug open reservoir to store water collected from elsewhere (Lasage and Verburg, 2015). The permeability of the pond can be reduced by using lining (concrete or plastic).Sizes vary from 30 m 3 (individual household use)to 20,000 m 3 (community use).Photo: Mounir LouhaichiWater harvesting structureContour bunds are effective methods to conserve soil moisture in watershed for long duration. They slow down runoff and improve water infiltration in the soil. Contour bunds can be continuous or intermittent.A special tractor-pulled plow that automatically constructs water-harvesting catchments, ideally suited for large-scale reclamation work.There are two types of modified tractor plows: the 'train' and the 'dolphin'. Used in microbasins 4-5 m long, 0.4 m wide, and 0.4 m deep. Applicable on areas 100-600 mm and on slopes between 2-10%.Photo: Mounir LouhaichiThis practice is widespread in areas receiving an average annual rainfall greater than 250 mm in Tunisia. The hill reservoirs contain tens of thousands to 1 million m 3 of water collected from small catchment areas of a few hectares to a few km 2 . The hill reservoirs built have a definite impact on the rural population by providing them with readily available water for their use. These reservoirs have also contributed to improving the environment, recharging the water table and protecting downstream infrastructure against flooding and siltation.Photo: PAN-LCD, TunisiaA contour trench and pit are an excavated ditch/pit along a uniform level across the slope of land in the top portion of catchment to trap runoff water.Photo: Mounir LouhaichiCisterns: means of collecting rainwater for drinking water supply. This is a very old rainwater collection system in North Africa. It is designed with the objective of supplying the household with water for various domestic uses, including irrigation and watering of livestock in arid and semi-arid environments. The collection of rainwater by cisterns is done from an impluvium which must be clean, sanitary and impermeable. The rainwater storage tanks can be of various shapes and geometry, storing water collected from a surface plot, capacity 5 m 3 -100 m 3 (Lasage and Verburg, 2015).Photo: Mounir Louhaichi Consists of a dam, terrace, and catchment area.The dam is made of stones and can be up to 200 m in length in wide valleys. The height of the dam can vary between 0.5 and 5 m. Runoff water is collected up to a height of about 20 cm or more before it is discharged downstream via the spillway.Photos: Mounir Louhaichi Small ridges constructed downslope (1-25%), reinforced with vegetation or stones to stabilize and break long slopes into smaller, less steep slopes.Spread water by slowing the flow of floodwater and distributing it over land to be cultivated, thus allowing it to infiltrate. Ideal on even topography or 1% slopes receiving 100-350 mm annual rainfall.Water-spreading bunds FAO, 1991 The following factors should be considered during the planning phase:• Water harvesting is not recommended for areas where slopes are greater than 5% due to uneven distribution of runoff and large, uneconomic investments in terms of machinery. Depending on the slope of the catchment area and the reason for water harvesting, mechanical water harvesting techniques are effective in upper • fertility, while sandy soils should be avoided to reduce loss of water Water harvesting is used in greening projects to conserve rainwater, a precious commodity in arid regions. An effective water supply to the soil-vegetation complex will increase the likelihood that rangeland restoration projects will succeed. Determining which water harvesting techniques have the best performance and choosing which ones to promote and scale up requires consideration of biophysical, technical, and socioeconomic factors.By increasing water retention and soil moisture, water harvesting techniques will affect important processes such as evaporation, transpiration, air humidity, air and soil temperature, soil microbial activity, soil organic matter build up, and decomposition. Raising awareness, promotion, and training will facilitate the adoption, adaptation, and spread of water harvesting practices among landowners. However, effective community participatory initiatives are still needed to promote the adoption of these techniques. action of the hooves of grazing animals. In the past, this was facilitated by the behavior of grazing wildlife which, when chased by predators, would stampede and break up the soil surface. However, nowadays, with domestic livestock grazing calmly at a slow pace, the impact of the herd is negligible, especially when the soil surface is already capped or crusted. There are certain practices that can mimic predator-induced behavior such as the use of a mobile watering facility or additional feeding and/or mineral supplementation (for example, salt in a granular form).Crusted or capped soils are common in arid or semi-arid degraded rangelands, either occurring naturally or as a result of poor management.Without measures to improve soil conditions, rangeland rehabilitation efforts often result in unacceptably low seed germination and/or seedling performance. Success rates may be improved by human intervention, and chemical processes within the soil that enhance plant survival and growth.to enhance ecosystem processes. Soil respiration is improved, water can penetrate faster, the germination and emergence of seeds are is commonly used to ensure successful regeneration of vegetation either through natural rehabilitation or by direct seeding. compacted the soil is, how hard the crusted layer is, and whether rocks rippers, or other devices capable of disturbing the upper 5-10 cm of the crusty soil. Cultivators consist of a frame, tines with reversible shovels, and heavy-duty springs. The teeth work on the soil surface to loosen the soil without inversion.(==:7>5N:)5H89:H:6>A>5<6 • The drag chain harrow is a simple, quick and effective way to break crust while keeping the soil healthy and can help reduce the risk of erosion, while also helping with moisture retention• Cautionary note-there could be limitations according to soil depth or the risk of wind erosion. Land managers should assess the overall conditions of the site (slope, soil texture, soil depth) to make sure tools used are appropriate. Direct seeding reduces the time and labor required, increasing resource a method recommended in the lowlands and landscape depressions (Marab) that receive additional amounts of rainwater from runoff because the extra soil moisture improves seedling emergence and establishment. Furthermore, under intensifying climate change and increasing soil degradation rates, direct seeding without disturbing the soil (no-tillage) is becoming more appealing. Such practice helps the soil retain moisture and maintain more organisms that break down organic matter into vital nutrients, increasing the potential for nutrient recycling, leading to healthy soil.$H84B:)5H8A7>)<=)E54:7>);::E56FThe limit on the success of direct seeding in drylands is due to drought, soil surface crusting and compaction, slow permeability, low available water capacity, and seed mortality due to heat and predation by birds or insects. Direct seeding is feasible on drylands if well-adapted species and recommended seeding methods are used. Outcomes can be improved through better site selection and ground preparation through drilling and pitting seeds to enhance germination and survival. Drills and pits can be created by hand or machine, and they contribute to protecting the seeds and improving moisture capture in arid areas.Furthermore, a rest period is needed to allow species to emerge and avoid plant being uprooted or compacted.Rangeland degradation resulting from unsustainable human activities and climate change is a serious threat to natural resources in arid and semi-arid areas. Changes in rangelands use, and management practices are urgently required to slow down and even reverse degradation.There are several solutions available to tackle rangeland degradation.One of the most rapid and cost-effective options is direct seeding, which than transplanting seedlings nurtured elsewhere.Due to the low cost of direct seeding, large-scale degraded rangeland whether to restore rangelands with native or exotic species, we must ,54:7>) ;::E56F) A6E) 5>;) H:45>;) A;) A) 4:;><4A>5<6)Direct seeding is currently receiving much attention as a method of rangeland improvement. Direct seeding is suitable for small or large areas where the terrain and cost of transplanting seedlings prevent natural regeneration or planting. It is an age-old practice that has regained favor due to the high costs associated with alternative methods of planting and transporting seedlings from nurseries for transplanting. Another direct seeding technique is depth and covering them with soil. In this method, sowing tools are used for placing the seeds into the soil. Several options are available, such as mechanical seed drillers and pitting machines. The latter is towed by an ordinary two-wheel-drive pickup making it popular and achievable with of inclined metal disks just before the rainy season. Seeds are placed in each pit either by hand or through a seed hopper mounted on top conditions for emergence and growth.is usually practiced. Dibbling entails making small holes in the ground for seeds using a pointed stick or a long piece of wood, then dropping seeds into the holes and covering them with soil, all by hand. Some pastoral communities in West Asia have developed the practice of using livestock to distribute seeds. Seeds are harvested by hand and placed in a pouch that is punctured with holes and strung around are widely distributed. This is an example of low cost local technology that partially replicates the role livestock play when they graze desired species and distribute seeds in their dung.For remote and inaccessible sites, is an option. It is often used to spread seeds to large land areas that need vegetative cover after severe degradation that has depleted the soil seed bank.(6BA6756F);::E956F):H:4F:67:)A6E) :;>AC95;BH:6>Seed pretreatment methods such as mechanical and chemical factors. Seed pretreatment also speeds up seedling emergence and enhances seed survival. Sowing at the right time and the proper depth is critical to the success of direct seeding..B<<;56F)>B:)C:;>);8:75:;)=<4)E54:7>);::E56F the biophysical and socio-economic condition of the target site and its community. In general, plants that grow naturally in the same habitat have the greatest chance of success. Exotic species such as fodder shrubs may also perform well under direct seeding once their ecological demands in the target site are met.Given the nature of rangeland landscapes, the most common method of direct seeding is -sprinkling the seeds by hand. It is the easiest and cheapest method, requiring less labor compared to seedling transplantation. In most cases, this intervention is usually against birds and other predators. \"ENA6>AF:;)<=)E54:7>);::E56F@• Rapid and cost-effective method for large-scale restoration of degraded rangeland• Seeds are easier and cheaper to transport and store than seedlings• Large areas can be covered with direct seeding because of its relatively low transport costs, while storage of seed is straightforward and cheaper than for seedlings• Requires less time and labor than transplanting• Plants develop deep, robust root systems that allow them to establish themselves quickly to withstand drought and wind, unlike transplanted seedlings• treatments, and rainy season• Able to access rough and distant terrains through aerial seeding• Promotes vegetative growth in less accessible areas, such as hillsides, rocky, and uneven terrain (Though more success can be achieved in lowlands)• Better root growth in preparation for harsh conditions such as drought or overgrazing• A higher level of seed germination in the years following the original sowing (depending on biophysical conditions).A new approach in direct seeding is planting pellets stuffed with combinations of fertilizer nutrients and pesticides to enhance the establishment of vegetation cover by aerial seeding in semi-arid regions.The seeds are coated with materials that will not disintegrate when in contact with moisture on the soil surface, and the pellets absorb enough moisture to cause germination through the coat.Another potential solution to land degradation is the use of biodegradable materials such as geotextiles that hold moisture, allowing seeds to germinate and establish roots even during low rainfall. This method can also control erosion and sediment.(==:7>5N:)4<<>):;>AC95;BH:6>)A6E);::E956F) HA56>:6A67:• Selection of suitable sites and appropriate pre-sowing treatments is vital for successful direct seeding• Always assess remnant vegetation, soil, risks, and opportunities along with the purpose of the revegetation• A mixture of seeds (including shrubs and herbaceous species) can be sown simultaneously to increase the chance of at least one species establishing even in case of prolonged drought • Sowing at the right time, generally at the beginning of the rainy season to ensure optimum soil moisture, increases success• Sowing at the right depth for species seed size is vital to root establishment• The sowing rate should be based on seed viability (not total seed) and adjusted density compared to the original and reference rangeland ecosystem. This ensures adequate seeding rates are met in case the seed germination rate was low• For successful root establishment, seed quality should be checked• Certain species require pretreatment to break seed dormancy (mechanical or chemical treatment)• If the seeds are too small, mixing them with sand makes a bulky mixture easier to handle• Respect plant association and try to balance species composition accordingly to avoid plant competition over limited resources• A high seeding rate increases overall seedling emergence and establishment• Avoid incorporating the seed too deeply, especially in heavy soils (clay) or where soil surface sealing is a problem as the plants are less likely to establish themselves. Direct seeding is a fast and cost-effective method to revive rangeland vegetation. It is also well suited for a large-scale degraded environment due to its reduced costs (no need for nursery and seedling transplantation). However, the micro-environment of the developing seedling is an important factor. Therefore, selecting groups of species with similar habitat requirements at the establishment phase will improve species establishment and increase restoration success. Timing of sowing and using methods to enhance seed germination should be considered, such as seed pretreatment techniques and seeding depth.for rehabilitation of degraded arid and semi-arid rangelands. Range Management and Agroforestry. 35(2): 182-187. To ensure successful rangeland rehabilitation, the choice of species native species. Extra caution should be always taken against the risk of invasive alien species. In arid and semi-arid areas, common fodder shrubs include Atriplex halimus (Mediterranean saltbush), A. leucoclada (orache), A. nummularia (old man saltbush), Bassia prostrata (desert bush), Salsola vermiculata (Mediterranean saltwort), and Haloxylon aphyllum (saxaul). Ceratonia siliqua L. (carob tree), a long-living evergreen tree native to the Mediterranean, is commonly used to provide shade for livestock during hot summers. Certain shrubs/trees contain anti-nutritional factors (secondary chemical compounds or toxins) which reduce the overall digestibility and palatability of their forage quality.Care must be taken to select highly adaptable species suited to the low rainfall and salt conditions of arid environments.The degradation of rangelands is induced by overgrazing, over-gathering Over-exploitation results in negative effects leading to soil erosion and the reduction of forage biomass for livestock. To alleviate the spread of rangeland degradation, planting shrubs provides a large amount of natural resource conservation.$H8<4>A67:)<=);B4DC;V>4::;Shrubs/trees reduce solar radiation and soil temperature, conserve moisture, and enrich the soil nutrient content. In providing ecosystem goods (especially forage for livestock and carbon sequestration), shrubs in arid zones boost poverty alleviation strategies and contribute to reducing food insecurity. The integration of shrubs through alley cropping utilizing a piece of land, thus improving the livelihoods of smallholder farmers./8:75:;)A6E);5>:);:9:7>5<6Select shrubs/trees well-adapted to conditions of individual planting sites. The choice of species will depend on the annual rainfall amount, soil, topography, runoff, water harvesting potential of the site, and the likelihood of environmental stresses such as drought, salinity, and cold. Species selection is also guided by rangeland development objectives, control. .56F)S5>B)SA>:4) BA4N:;>56F)>:7B65WD:;When seedlings are planted on steep slopes, water harvesting such as semicircle structures or intermittent contours, shrub planting improves erosion control, forage quality and availability, and plant and animal micro-habitat conditions..BA99:6F:;)ED456F);B4DCV>4::)89A6>56FThe high cost related with the establishment and the maintenance of shrubs/trees presents the main challenge for smallholder farmers with low incomes. Another common issue faced by most shrub/tree planting programs is the availability of suitable species for the target ecosystem at the appropriate time. In most cases, supplementary irrigation is needed right after planting to secure strong roots and soil contact.Alternative feed resources to supplement livestock are most often in high demand in dry areas. This increases the risk of predation on transplanted shrubs as animals prefer the young succulent seedlings to the older and more mature plants.(;>AC95;BH:6>)A6E)HA6AF:H:6>Shrub/tree establishment and growth often suffer heavy plant losses due to intense lack of soil moisture.Several techniques are used to aid seed germination, such as seed overall productivity once established, rotational browsing/grazing of the rangeland will aid in reducing soil erosion, depletion of soil nutrients, prevalence of weeds/invasive species, and more uniform soil fertility levels. Before establishment, shrubs/trees should not be browsed as this reduces their growth and survival potential. such as soil erosion and also in creating microhabitats for vertebrate and invertebrate fauna. The establishment and management of shrubs/ trees requires that they receive a long enough period for them to recover lost biomass after a browsing and pruning event. Grazing pressures can have both positive and negative impacts on plant species. Grazing management requires these impacts to be balanced in order to optimize productivity over time. Grazing management is the process of grazing and browsing animals to accomplish a desired levels of livestock production coupled with maintaining quality wildlife habitat and ample recreational space. When managing grazing, both the plants and animals need to be considered.If the rangeland is grazed too intensively, particularly for sustained periods, both plant and animal production will be reduced. However, if the grazing pressure is too light forage use will be low, forage quality may decrease and animal production per unit area will be low.-4567589:;)<=)F4AY56F)HA6AF:H:6>The fundamental principle of grazing management is to control the frequency and severity of defoliation of individual plants. The principle point of time. Grazing management is a tool to optimize the capture and use of energy in grazing systems that enables maximum quality forage production, optimum harvest and the conversion by animals of that energy into a marketable product by animals. Timing of grazing and maintaining plant vigor, especially after-grazing events, are key factors to consider in controlling frequency, intensity and duration of grazing.production. Root respiration and nutrient acquisition are reduced.Root elongation ceases.The soluble carbohydrates within the roots rapidly decline.1 2 3 4 66 67PB:6)><)F4AY:ZGrazing optimization is often determined by the management objective of the production system. A land manager could be interested in maximizing sustainable yield from grazing and producing a valuable product for the market, promoting better ecosystem functioning by enhancing vegetation heterogeneity, or a range of objectives in between.Determining when to graze relies on knowledge of plant species physiology abundance and quality as forage, site characteristics including soil fertility, animal types and classes and their forage requirement and economic and management factors. Many range forage plants are highly nutritious and palatable during the early growing period then they steadily decline in quality and quantity over time. Understanding the forage growth cycle of the key forage species is essential to determine the optimal timing and duration of grazing.the productivity of the more nutritious and palatable plant species more nutritious and palatable plant species. Intensive grazing during the early growing season using livestock that are less selective to grazing has the potential to achieve this objective since plant growth relatively rapid and the forage resources are homogenously green. This also works well because the less desirous plants do not disperse their seeds and propagate.Higher biodiversity in supports a wider a wider variety of plant and animal species because they contain a structural complexity that provides heterogeneity in landscapes increases biodiversity, enhances ecosystem goods and services and provides long-term sustainability of ecosystems. This is particularly effective for the conservation of the functionality of large-scale ecological rangeland processes as in pastoral systems. In such a scenario, the grazing management would entail using different types and classes of livestock to graze on different environmental patches of the landscape to maintain heterogeneity.[:K)7;)<=)F4AY56F)HA6AF:H:6>The main components of grazing management include supply of forage, forage demand, degree of grazing use, and timing. The supply of forage depends on abundance, vigor, condition of the desirable plant species, and climate conditions. Forage demand is a function of the number of animals, forage intake by animal, which is correlated with metabolic body weight and number of grazing days, number of grazing days. Degree of use and timing of grazing are controlled by the grazing system (graze and rest periods), including the periodicity including periodicity and seasonality. Manipulation of these components is easier grazing or transhumance systems, although seasonal herd movements in transhumance systems can provide similar grazing management water. Grazing utility of land goes hand-in-hand with water provision and distribution within grazing blocks landscapes, but water is a leading factor in the degradation of pastures if it allows animals to remain too long in any one area. Water is often a challenge to consider especially areas where access to surface water including stream, rivers or lakes is not readily available.(==:7>5N:)F4AY56F)HA6AF:H:6>Timing is the most critical factor for effective grazing management.as well as mitigate any risks associated with grazing during rest periods, which will put pressure on rangeland plants. Effective grazing managementshould consider the timing rather than the overall grazing pressure. If pastures are being actively managed, and grazing pressure is avoided during rest periods, then high grazing pressure can be supported for short periods during the appropriate phase in the growth cycle of the pasture. The following principles should be taken into consideration in grazing management planning:systematically grazed and rested according to seasonal demands and the characteristics of both the vegetation and the environment. On private lands this is commonly practiced through rotational grazing and dividing the land into paddocks. On communal lands, it requires a high degree of agreement and coordination to implement effectively.Grazing management on communal lands can be controlled controlled by limiting access to water.Most grasslands have coevolved with grazing animals (ungulates) and balance. Grazing management depends on careful timing, both in terms of how long and how often grazing occurs. Plants are overgrazed as a periods between defoliations.Effective management means allowing time for full plant recovery before re-grazing when grass growth and nutritional value are at their maximum. Plant growth follows a sigmoid curve, growing at a slower rate when young, then accelerating, before slowing again towards maturity.Nutrient value starts to decline with seeding, so the optimal grazing time -in terms of both biomass and nutritional value -is soon after maturity. Usually re-grazing should not be allowed until grass species have matured and reproduced.Most grasslands consist of a community of valuable plants that mature at different rates, and and some may include both herbaceous and woody species. Timing, therefore, depends on a detailed local knowledge of both plant growth cycles and the desired combination of plant species for livestock production. The balance of plant species is determined by the livestock species (and the combination of species) as well as the livestock production objectives. Effective grazing management is is effectively applied through the local the local knowledge of herders.Grazing management plans are designed around periods of grazing and recovery of pasture areas. Plans are informed by the resting periods required for different plants, including the most desirable grasses and legumes. Decisions about moving animals from one pasture area to the next are based on the amount of forage available, size of the area, and the estimated seasonal growth rates. A key objective is to avoid repeated, severe defoliation of plants and allow for planned recovery periods.Grazing management faces the challenge of seasonal forage availability, with seasons of abundance and seasons of scarcity. Many pastoralist societies move their herds over great distances between seasons to exploit pasture zones with different grazing characteristics. Managing grazing patterns withinthese different areas can be challenging, particularly when each grazing area has a different group of users.Grazing management plans therefore need to be adapted to the social arrangements around pasture use, and management planning is usually dependent on identifying zones where the users have the right and the ability to enforce grazing rules.Continuous grazing, the most common grazing system in the world, often results in overgrazing and an increase of less-desirable or invasive invasive plant species. When livestock graze without restriction, they without allowing time for their roots to recover and leaves to regrow, they will die. Plants not eaten by livestock -the less desirable species -will mature, reproduce and thrive. $H8<4>A67:)<=)4A6F:9A6E)56N:6><4K56FT) H<65><456F)A6E)A;;:;;H:6> is to collect, gather, analysis, and interpretate natural resources data to characterize the ecological site and provide potential information for planning or other purposes following certain procedures. Site inventory data describes site biophysical, hydrological, and ecological features in addition to vegetation and animal resources, habitat assessments for wildlife and other variables that are relevant to the required planning goals. This data allows for comparison with other study sites.is the gathering of the ecological information that describes changes in rangeland attributes status using systematic and repeatable methods, usually to evaluate the response to certain intervention at the rangelands site.Data and results developed from repeated rangeland inventories can be used to produce the basis to compare responses and to support the site monitoring in order to assess the state of rangeland health according to that provide rapid, accurate, cost-effective, and robust measures of rangeland health and ecological trend.provides range lands manger and stakeholders with a communication tool regarding the status of ecosystem properties and processes on a site and how well they are functioning helping to develop clear adaptive restoration management.describes the current state of the vegetation compared with that of the climax or original vegetation for the range site. Range condition is used to measure deterioration or improvement in the plant community.condition.Before taking measurements, detailed properties of a site and vegetation toolkit has a separate section describing in greater details the information needed for developing the action plan based on site potentiality. In short, an ecological site description would include the following:• Coordinates of the target site, area, plot locations and transect starting points (where required) using GPS should be recorded.• distinguished by the dominant species• Soil type (sandy, silty, loamy, clay loam, limestone and sand dunes), in general rangeland soils are extremely diverse and different soil types may occur within the study site• Geomorphology: refers to the nature of the terrain (plains, hills, mountains, wadis, etc.)• Slope: usually expressed in percent or degrees• Climate: is the average weather conditions for the region (humid, semi-arid, arid, desert, etc.)• Meteorological data (rainfall, temperature, wind…) including their historical average and current average• Tenure systems (private, communal, public, protected, etc.)• Current state: natural reserve (park), rested (age of resting, implemented strategies, who supported the project), rotational grazing, continuously grazed, etc.)Figure 1. Measuring vegetation characteristics is essential in rangeland monitoring 76• Grazing patterns: stable grazing systems, seasonal, transhumant grazing, etc.)• Number of the main types of livestock (sheep, goats, cattle, camels or a mixed herd)• Distribution of water points./>AG:B<9E:4):6FAF:H:6>@)A)G:K)56F4:E5:6>Note: For a full description of this sub-section including stakeholder and grassland ecosystem health.Stakeholder engagement is particularly recommended at the following stages in rangeland assessment:Participatory indicator selection is usually combined with selection of pre-determined indicators, particularly when rangeland assessment needs to be carried out for comparison between different landscape managements (e.g., as part of a national methodology and monitoring they can also show differences in perceptions and understanding, and analysing how indicators diverge can be informative (Figure 2).• Changes to total vegetation cover (species density, bare ground, stony surface and rocky outcrops)• Change in the balance of herbaceous and woody vegetation• Change in total vegetation diversity • Presence of palatable species and other economically important species• Presence of invasive plants and undesirable species• Change in diversity of wild animals, birds, insects and other native species• Changes in topsoil properties (loosening, crusting, erosion)• Loss of soil nutrients, including soil organic carbon• Changes in seed stocks in the soil.2:>B<456F)\\)A;;:;;H:6>)There are numerous methods for monitoring and assessing rangelands.and on assessing rangeland conditions by determining vegetation cover, density, biomass, forage production, and plant diversity in each plant community to evaluate its status.provide detailed information for assessing the health of rangelands.Cost, however, often limits monitoring locations to a few key areas or random plots that observe a small fraction of the land they are intended to represent. There are many indicators that use plot-based methods for including:is the relative area covered by single plants, a group of individuals of a single species, or all species of plant community. It is expressed as a percentage of the total area of the plant community. Vegetation cover is estimated by the point intercept method. A metal pin or stake is inserted vertically next to the measuring tape at 50 cm intervals (100 points). The intersection at each point is recorded (vegetation, litter, stone, crust, recording measurements from at least three transects laid out in either the spoke or parallel design. The layout of transects may vary depending on landscape-scale. Parallel transects must be evenly spaced. 8). However, the geographic extent of drone imagery products is often limited to a few 1 cm) due to image collection and processing constraints.Digital cameras monitoring vegetation cover has an important role by conventional vegetation monitoring. In fact, digital vegetation charting technique (DVCT) is one of the most reliable technique for the monitoring of vegetation under different physiographic conditions (Louhaichi et al., 2018). It is less subjective and easy to use while providing high frequency and resolution data. The analysis of the color of images taken by high-resolution allow the detection of vegetation cover using software such as VegMeasure ® to create meaningful classes through quantifying the red, green, and blue (RGB) color channels of each pixel (Louhaichi et al., 2019) (Figure 9). However, the low height pictures taken by the human makes this technique suitable to monitor the vegetation cover of annuals and small size shrubs but not the tall ones or trees. proportion of milk product, and providing valuable animal protein in many countries that suffer from malnutrition and food insecurity.Thirty percent of rangelands and grasslands are estimated to be degraded worldwide, although the estimates range widely, depending that more than two thirds of their rangelands are degraded. Rangeland and grassland degradation create social, environmental and economic threats. They contribute to food and water insecurity, poverty, and grassland health assessment is therefore crucial for identifying land degradation and monitoring efforts to restore those lands and to address the associated social, environmental and economic risks.Global assessments of rangeland degradation invariably use remote sensing data that gives an indication of biomass productivity, but provides little insight into the desirability of that biomass. The risk of misdiagnosis of rangeland degradation becomes more serious when these methodologies are used for assessment at the national and sub-national level. There are numerous examples of misdiagnosis of rangeland degradation or health that have led to harmful investments or missed opportunities. Historically, this is perhaps most notoriously and barren lands of no value that are waiting to be put to good use. .BA99:6F:;)><)4A6F:9A6E)B:A9>B)A;;:;;H:6>)Grasslands and savannahs are the most widespread biomes within rangelands. The composition, structure, productivity, and diversity of these ecosystems are governed by a combination of climate, geography, topography, geology, and soil. Many rangelands and grasslands ecological communities.The unique factors that create rangelands and grasslands also create challenges to objectively assessing their health. Foremost among these challenges is the non-equilibrium nature of drylands, which transition between stable states in response to different forces acting on multi annual and decadal time scales. For example, a savannah may rest in a grass-dominated state for many decades, then transition to a tree-dominated state, perhaps due to a drought-induced reduction in natural herbivory, only to transition back to grass-dominated decades it is challenging to agree on a baseline against which degradation or restoration processes can be evaluated.A second challenge to rangeland and grassland health assessment of all rangelands globally are used for livestock production, most of it low-pressure and extensive. The healthy state of these lands can therefore be a subjective judgement based on the desired objectives of the managers. For example, an African grassland may be particularly desirable to a cattle herder but less desirable to a camel herder. The same land could transition to shrub-dominated, meeting the production objectives of the camel herders but viewed as degraded by the cattle herder. Wildlife managers face a similar challenge since most rangelands are highly heterogeneous, providing many different habitats that support different assemblages of species, some of which depend on grasslands and others on shrublands or woodlands.Rangelands have been described as \"land on which the indigenous vegetation (climax or sub-climax) is predominantly grasses, grasslike plants, forbs or shrubs that are grazed or have the potential to be grazed, and which is used as a natural ecosystem for the production of grazing livestock and wildlife\" (Allen et al., 2011). Faber-Langendoen et al. (2012) place grasslands and rangelands into two natural formation classes: i) Shrubland and Grassland and ii) Desert & Semi-Desert.However, other actors view rangelands as a socio-economic system, according to ecological criteria. In this view, rangelands can include a combination of pasture lands, woodlands, wetlands, oases, riparian zones, and other resource areas and habitat types. The diversity of resources that are implied in a typical rangeland system, as well as monitoring rangeland health.(9:H:6>;)<=):==:7>5N:)4A6F:9A6E)B:A9>B) A;;:;;H:6>The following elements have proven to be required for effective assessment of rangeland health. These elements do not necessarily take place in the order listed. the responsibility of a public institution and the scale may be determined by institutional boundaries, while the indicators may be determined by the relative infrequency of monitoring. Restoration action is sometimes their management system -often extending beyond administrative boundaries -while they may use a wide range of indicators to track short term changes in rangeland condition. While restoration action may require support to build the capacities of pastoral communities to assess rangeland health, restoration planning may require different actions to institutionalise assessment and monitoring, and to ensure indicator sets and methodologies are affordable, scalable and replicable.A common problem with rangeland health assessment has been encountered at the preliminary stage of agreeing the goal of the assessment. Different actors require different information to support decision making and there is a tendency to address multiple assessment goals simultaneously, leading to collection of more information than may be required or manageable. This can overwhelm the assessors with information that is beyond their capacity to analyse and interpret.Heavy methodologies that incorporate large numbers of indicators may sometimes be useful for projects that are designed to deliver many results, but they are at risk of remaining within a project and not being institutionalised for long term use. In the PRAGA methodology (referenced at the end of this document) IUCN recommends focusing on the minimum number of indicators to strike a balance between costeffectiveness (and capacity-effectiveness) and adequacy: indicators that are robust but feasible.$E:6>5=K)>B:)9A6E;7A8:)=<4)A;;:;;H:6>)A6E)>B:) 4:9:NA6>);>AG:B<9E:4;)56)>BA>)9A6E;7A8:In many cases, the landscape for assessment has been determined before the assessment has been conceived. Nevertheless, it is important Some groups may have a vested interested in disenfranchising other stakeholders and the stakeholder analysis should be through and independent. Although pastoralists are often marginalised within their country, other ethnic groups may be marginalised within a pastoral territory. Stakeholder analysis should examine gender roles and responsibilities in different rangeland communities and should ensure that the rangeland assessment is gender responsive.Stakeholder analysis should examine public institutions and private business interests within the landscape. Rangelands frequently fall between multiple public sectors and decision making has implications for ministries of livestock, forests, wildlife, water and others. Meanwhile the assessment should be informed of the expectations of different business interests, including private landowners, mining concessions, conservation organisations and others.+A>B:4)4:9:NA6>)CA7GF45<6Background information, from secondary data sources and local informants, can be compiled to characterise the target landscape and to gather available environmental and socio-economic data. Background information is useful for identifying potential challenges of access to the access -such as the lack of roads or seasonal accessibility -can be addressed through careful planning, while barriers created by insecurity need to be taken seriously. Rangeland assessments can be undermined by access constraints, since access will determine how areas in a landscape are used and therefore what condition they are in. Depending on the purpose of assessment, and the rangeland management system, economic data may also be gathered, including data on income and assets, and livestock production and health data. However, relating this to rangeland health assessments in most communal settings has proven to be challenging and not particularly informative.-A4>5758A><4K)56E57A><4)E:N:9<8H:6>There are a number of stages of rangeland assessment where participation with stakeholder is required, although participation may not be required at all stages and may impose an unnecessary burden on rangeland users. Participation is particularly recommended at the following stages in rangeland health assessment:1. Identifying and mapping the target landscape and determining management objectives and uses of different landscape patches according to the agreed management objectives 3. Interpretation and validation of the assessment results.some key community representatives, both to provide local knowledge and to ensure security, participation of a meaningful number of community members in data collection is usually not feasible and can be an unwanted burden. Participatory approaches to indicator selection are not discussed in detail here, but can be reviewed in the PRAGA manual.Participatory indicator selection is usually combined with selection of predetermined indicators, particularly when rangeland assessment needs to be carried out for comparison between landscapes (e.g. as part of a national methodology and monitoring system). While local indicators in perceptions and understanding, and analysing how indicators diverge can be informative. A thorough understanding of local ownership and rights, including seasonal rights, should inform site selection. Bias at this stage of selection can be construed as recognising the rights of one claimant cases, Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) may need to be sought before engaging in participatory assessment.• Coordinates of the target site (using GPS), plot locations, transect• Vegetation communities distinguished by the dominant species • Soil type (rangeland soils can be extremely diverse)• Geomorphology (plains, hills, mountains, rivers, water pans, wadis etc.)Slope and tendency (e.g. north or south facing)• Climate data and climate change projections• Tenure systems (private, communal, public, protected, etc.) and current primary and secondary uses of different resource areas• Grazing patterns (e.g. stable grazing systems, seasonal, transhumant grazing, etc.)• Number of the main types of livestock (sheep, goats, camels or a mixed herd)• Distribution of water points Socio-economic data may be required to help interpret the rangeland health assessment and to interpret drivers, pressures, state, impact and responses to land degradation. In some cases, rangeland health assessment will be aligned with other national assessment and reporting mechanisms. For example, some countries have applied the 5 UNCCD Impact Indicators as the minimum-standard for cross-comparability between sites. These indicators have the added value of strengthening reporting on UNCCD commitments while being an established indicator set, and therefore a low cost option for ongoing impact monitoring. ,A>A)7<99:7>5<6)A6E)84:95H56A4K)A6A9K;5;Data collection often begins during a participatory workshop, where rangeland stakeholders are asked to map their landscape in its current state, and map their vision of the landscape after a period of improvement. Rangeland maps should be developed at the appropriate element above. These maps can be drawn overlaid on a printed digital map, allowing features, plots, transects etc. to be digitised for future analysis.Remote sensing data is often introduced after this mapping exercise, to cross-examine trends observed using satellite data and trends observed through local knowledge and experience. Remotely sensed maps are some stakeholders. Site sampling is often best performed during these mapping workshops, For example, local communities may differentiate different aridity zones, different seasonal grazing areas, or altitude zones. Sampling sites can be pre-selected in each of these zones to ensure adequate coverage.The data collection team is often assembled to include representatives from key stakeholder groups and institutions, including community members. The numbers are typically limited by access to vehicles and other practical considerations. It is usually desirable to include a balance Data is usually collected on data sheets, and increasingly makes use of mobile phone apps that allow geolocation and photographs in each sample site. This accelerates the data management and analysis as well as the consistency of responses between different groups that may be sampling different sites and locations.$6>:484:>A>5<6)A6E)NA95EA>5<6)<=)4:;D9>;)Most IUCN rangeland assessment use the DPSIR framework for analysis: drivers, pressures, state, impact and response. Underlying drivers of rangeland degradation -such as population growth and economic development -need to be understood to guide long term rangeland development planning. More attention is needed to reach agreement on the pressures that driver rangeland degradation, such as inappropriate crop and livestock production, of poor location of water resources, which can be contentious. The assessment can be used to develop consensus as far as possible, or to identify areas of disagreement that can be addressed through follow-on activities.Results of rangeland assessment should also be interpreted through the prism of climate change, projecting likely trends and responses to climate change scenarios. This includes projected changes in water availability and severity of weather events. Climate analysis can also draw on secondary background information collected earlier in the assessment, including data and key informant perceptions of observable climate changes Validation of the results of rangeland assessment is the third of the recommended stages where a participatory approach is recommended.implications for rangeland management, and recommended responses.Ideally this validation exercise is a step between assessment and action, enabling stakeholders to take ownership of the response measures.The validation exercise is also a critical opportunity to examine practical solutions for addressing rangeland degradation and develop support for collective action where necessary, for example through the development of community rangeland management plans. Before deciding on the type of SRM practice(s) a thorough diagnostic is conducted for each selected site:• Site name, county, state, country .95HA>57)A6E)H:>:<4<94<9Arid rangelands in Tunisia are known for their variety, with ecosystems such as steppes, mountains, hills, wadis and various types of soil. In their current state, arid rangelands may not meet pastoralist needs for managing livestock production, wildlife, or ecosystem health and the effects of grazing pressure vary depending on different systems (Figure an important role in arid rangeland rehabilitation in sandy soils and depressions. Native plants can be reintroduced through direct seeding, transplanting seedlings, or both (Figure 10). This management technique is recommended during the rainy season to guarantee seed emergence and plant growth.When the ground is sloped, crusted and stony, all the variables that cause stormwater runoff can be mitigated with proven practices for conserving water and improving landscape management. Some of these practices double as effective landscape features. For example, microcatchment water harvesting and dams are the common forms of water harvesting and erosion control for sloping land and give a pleasing order and symmetry to the landscape (Figure 11). On milder slopes, semicircular bunds and Vallerani water harvesting These also form visually pleasing lines in the landscape and double as suitable beds for plants.A micro-catchment water harvesting system is simply a ditch constructed berm prevents it from continuing downhill. The water will then percolate into the ground, and any sediment that it may contain will be deposited in the base of the berm. Sometimes, seeding or transplanting forage shrubs in micro-catchment berms is recommended as a method of improving degraded rangelands. Historically, the Artemisia rangelands in Karnabchul were the primary grazing lands providing reliable feed resources for the sheep, goats, and cattle of the local population for centuries. The most critical factor affecting Artemisia rangelands is the high and mismanaged sheep number of small ruminants has increased during the past 20-25 years. Due to the extensive development of livestock husbandry and human pressure, these valuable ecosystems are facing an increasing and detrimental anthropogenic stress. As a consequence, more 50% of through overgrazing and fuel wood harvesting. The vegetatoin is being replaced with weedy, poisonous plants such as Peganum harmala and unpalatable Iris songarica.Ecological monitoring and assessment of the current condition and historic degradation trends of Artemisia ecosystems is a major concern in Karnabchul to prevent further degradation and to undertake conservation and restoration measures. Thus, a site characterization of Karnabchul rangeland is the key to understanding the causes of degradation and developing appropriate conservation and restoration measures. In rangeland areas, the decline of underground water and increase in salinity is common *Incidence of water borne diseases and pollutants Sources: Health sector and water authorities.Not available 7).At present, rangeland degradation covers large spatial and temporal scales. According to estimates, 50-70% of rangeland areas are affected by different levels of degradation. However, the exact spatial and temporal extent and the trend of this degradation is largely unknown due to the absence of a comprehensive framework for the assessment of rangeland conditions.#B:)&::E)=<4)-A4>5758A><4K)!A6F:9A6E) 2A6AF:H:6>The most severe rangeland degradation in Uzbekistan occurs around settlements and villages and is largely due to mismanagement. This happens because of the weakness or absence of participatory governance systems (planning and management) in rangeland areas.A production-oriented management philosophy has dominated rangeland management across Uzbekistan for the last century Going forward, rangeland research should focus on applying rangeland health indicators, conceptual ecological models and threshold theories, which have been developed and widely applied in other rangelanddominated countries. Current methods are easy to adapt can be used to organize existing knowledge into a conceptual framework (Briske et al., 2005). They are an effective tool for improving our understanding of the current state and dynamics of rangeland ecosystems.Applying these methods also allows for developing realistic strategies for better management of resources and can be effectively applied and scaled out in Uzbekistan.!A6F:9A6E)7<6E5>5<6)A;;:;;H:6> Based on these indicators and their quantitative changes along the of degradation. In addition, reversible and irreversible transitions of vegetation states were established. Most important, this framework allowed planners to differentiate healthy and degraded rangelands measures needed for an adaptive grazing plan. Assessing the available rotational schemes are integral steps in the developing of adaptive rangeland management and its successful implementation.(7<9<4A>5<6 native functions and services of rangeland ecosystems. Based on the level of alteration in species composition and their richness, the duration of grazing exclusion will be different.Using the indicative properties of vegetation and quantitative criteria for condition assessment, various levels of rangeland degradation can be differentiated and a series of treatments implemented to promote desirable native species. Vegetation treatments can include mechanical control of noxious species and direct seeding of perennial semi-shrubs such as Artemisia spp. without tillage. In severely degraded rangelands with strong turf layers of Poa bulbosa and Carex pachystylis, limited tillage is recommended to break up the compacted turf layer for Artemisia to promote the growth of vegetation after direct seeding. When seeding, Native species must be used when seeding. Alien species are not recommended.Treatments can be repeated based on the rate of restoration. The restoration area must be protected as until it has returned to its native condition. As soon as evaluations suggest the restored area is healthy, adaptive grazing plans can be developed and implemented Figure 9).The Jordan Badia constitutes 80% of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (Al-Tabini et al., 2012). The steppe rangelands of the Jordanian Badia are continuously being degraded, many indigenous plant species have disappeared, and their productivity has been halved over the last two decades. Productivity has fallen to a disturbingly low level-less than rangelands.With the rapid deterioration of rangelands and increasing climate change impacts, pressure grew on the government to resolve these problems.At the beginning of 2000, the government responded to this crisis with urgency. Their strategy comprised important measures such as rangeland management and restoration, for example, shrubs planting, strategy has been well received as it offers technical solutions. However, it remains challenging for pastoral communities to own the process. This change in behavior needs time to be fully embraced.Based on recent as well as historical data, it is clear that the rangeland condition of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is declining. Rangelands must be healthy, productive and diverse to meet the needs of rural communities and society today as well as those of future generations.will better support the social and economic needs of the population.Climate condition, soil type, land use type, livestock, population density, distribution, and change, along with the demographics of the project area, are useful attributes for rangeland rehabilitation projects. These attributes also provide an understanding of how rangeland rehabilitation could affect the livelihoods of people living in the project area. They are called the Ecological Site Characteristics, include:Site characterization reports also include information about what the site is best suited for, such as 1) wildlife and livestock uses, 2) hydrologic functions, 3) other products the site may produce. Using this information, land managers can evaluate the suitability of their land for various purposes, set realistic goals and better predict the outcomes of management practices. Baseline data collection should cover some or all topics listed below as appropriate.Some or even much of the required data may needed may already be available in government ministries and departments, UN agencies dissertations. A great deal of time and money can be spent duplicating the work of others, time and money better spent on implementation and action on the ground. !A6F:9A6E)4:;><4A>5<6The primary goal of restoration projects in the Badia rangelands is livestock production. However, the multiple-use of rangelands also includes soil and water conservation, especially in watersheds. For a plan. For example, in many areas of water shortage, water harvesting is necessary for strengthening efforts to ensure the success of any restoration program. Potential solutions to restore and rehabilitate degraded rangelands in Badia vary across locations, soil surface, degree of slope, and the degree of rangeland degradation.PB:6)4A6F:9A6E)845N5>K)E<:;)6<>):J7::E) >B:)E:F4AEA>5<6)>B4:;B<9E This degradation leads to slight degeneration of vegetation and soil surface erosion. These changes represent a light disturbance that allows vegetation to recover when intervening to rehabilitate. When the vegetation cover is higher than 20%, natural restoration of vegetation they can undergo natural recovery without human intervention. Grazing exclusion can be used to implement seasonally deferred grazing practices. During favorable climatic periods protection from grazing on rangeland health (Louhaichi et al., 2021). Instead of abandoning rangelands due to their advanced degradation status, there are certain actions which could reverse trend or at least slow it including:Exclude grazing and leave rangelands as they are.Soil surface scarification and direct seeding can play an important role in the rehabilitation of relatively flat rangeland.Prohibit all human activities that can hamper vegetation development so that the local species could colonize the rangeland.Native plants can be reintroduced through direct seeding, transplanting seedlings, or both.1 2 3 4.<6;5E:4A>5<6;The degradation hazard of some species may be insensitive to a decrease reduce litter accumulation on soil surfaces, disruption of nutrient cycles, formation of soil crusts, disruption of nutrient cycles that retard or impede germination on microsites, and altered species composition (Archer, 1989). Given these circumstances, the availability of microsites should be developed to serve as useful factors of changes in the vegetation cover.disturbance of the soil surface to permit deeper water penetration and provide microsites for seedling establishment.of the soil surface to enhance seeding success is frequently advocated as a mechanism to create a favorable microsite and retain soil moisture for germination and seedlings survival./>::8^;9<8:E)4A6F:9A6E;Increased grazing pressure, often on steep slopes, results in rangeland degradation until abandoned once they became denuded which exacerbates the grazing pressure on other existing rangelands. To ensure that the productive potential of rangeland and sustainability of livestock production is maintained in the long term, implementing adaptive rangeland management should be required.In arid environments, rainfall is one of the most limiting factors associated with the failure and the success of rangeland management projects. Rainwater harvesting practices are usually combined with shrub plantation and direct seeding and protection from grazing for successful rangeland rehabilitation. Therefore, rainwater harvesting techniques are considered a part of the solution to improving arid rangeland productivity. Rainwater harvesting systems can be constructed in several ways that are easy, versatile, and adaptable to a wide range of conditions. They can be used anywhere in rural areas, and local people can be easily trained to install them. This lowers costs and promotes community engagement, ownership, and sustainability. the needs of the vegetation recovering by planting and seeding. The amount of water collected from such watersheds depends on the size of the area, the constructed catchment, the intensity of the precipitation, and soil permeability.For small areas, using semi-circular bunds and V-shaped micro catchments are an appropriate practice for rehabilitation of degraded rangeland.The sizes of semi-circular bunds vary from small structures (2 m) to very large structures (30 m). Bunds are constructed by digging out soil from within the area to be enclosed and supporting it up to form the bund. They are easy to construct and reduce soil erosion and catch water to insure good storage for the shrubs. The bunds should be established along a contour line in a matched arrangement so that water, will be caught and collected by those two main tips. Semi-circular bunds are suitable on gentle slopes areas. One or two shallow holes are dug in the lowest part to help concentrate micro catchments are well suited for hand construction, they cannot easily be mechanized. These micro catchments are mainly used for growing trees or shrubs in arid and semi-arid areas.For large areas, contour bunds are best suited for rainwater harvesting. They are suitable on the sloping ground of low rainfall areas where runoff can be impounded by constructing bunds along the contour of equal elevation. Contour bunds may be continuous contour furrows or intermittent contours.Contour furrows are small soil banks that run along a contour. A furrow should be established next to each bank on the upper side of the slope. The distance between the ridges varies depending on the rainfall and the slope. The aim of contour furrows is to concentrate moisture into the ridge and furrow area where the plants are placed by trapping runoff water from the catchment area. This also reduces the erosion risk. To maximize the runoff between the two ridges, the catchment area should be left uncultivated and clear of vegetation.To prevent the destruction of the contour bunds, intermittent contours are useful for erosion control. Contour scale rehabilitation. The optimal distance between two contours depends upon the slope of the area, where steeper grounds require less distance.148 149 !A6F:9A6E)FAG:B<9E:4;_)56N<9N:H:6>Rangeland management governance mechanisms, which include stakeholders, tackle rangeland-related issues and implicate other sectors that interact with rangelands. At the local level and to deal with governance processes, a rangeland council or association can be established where all stakeholders can consult on rangelands management issues.The involvement of all stakeholders in rangeland assessment is one of the best practices in their management. This requires starting by identifying, mapping and evaluating the role of each stakeholder, its responsibility as well as the degree of implications on rangelands management activities. The analysis of social aspects and factors affecting rangeland management can be carried out by relying on social surveys, interviews, and rural appraisal methods. The involvement and cooperation between stakeholders should be both horizontal intra and inter communities and local authorities but also vertical between the local communities and the central institutions. The establishment of rangeland associations or councils at the local level is very useful for management consultation. These associations will play key roles in the implementation of support programs related to rangeland management originating from the central government. Once rangeland is rehabilitated through combined practices such as management is an effective tool for sustainable management of these harsh ecosystems. Grazing management is a tool to balance the capture of energy by the plants, the harvest of that energy by animals, and the conversion of that energy into a marketable product. Timing of grazing and growth rate of plants after-grazing events are key factors in controlling frequency, intensity and duration of grazing. These factors improve livestock production.These rehabilitation practices make it viable for pastoralists to increase livestock production by increasing their herd sizes. They also increase the economic and environmental conditions, such as improving the food security status in drought years and reducing grazing pressure on the natural rangelands from the increased vegetation cover.#B:) HA6AF:H:6>) <=) >B:) 5H84:;T) A=>:4) >B:) 4:;>) A6E) 4:BAC595>A>5<6T) ;BB:) E5N:4;5>K) <=) >B:) :6N54<6H:6>A9) 7<6E5>5<6;) <=) >B:) 4A6F:) ;5>:;) A6E) 95H5>) ><) >B:) H565HDH) >B:) 7BA6F:) 56) >B:) D;DA9) HA6AF:H:6>) H:>B5<6;) A4:) 5H8<4>A6>@The sites will be subject to rest technique (including those to be rehabilitated) for two years to increase the chances of rehabilitating their stock in seeds and / or strains of the most important pastoral plants and those seriously affected by mismanagement In the third year, the rested areas will be open to grazing only once during the vegetative dormant season to enhance the cumulative forage units (FUs) and take advantage of the animal impact (burying short duration during the vegetative growth season (preferably at the during the dormant period of the main pastoral species but of longer duration (until almost total use of the annual grass cover). The duration of this second grazing period and the stocking density will depend on the fodder supply (carrying capacity), the availability of water for watering the herd and the size of the herds entitled to access the perimeter in question, but roughly, the animals can stay if the breeders wish, subject to the following conditions: Not to take more than 60% of the consumable biomass offered by perennials (all of the biomass offered by annuals can be consumed at the latest) All animals using the site must leave it the same day and before At the end of the dormant period, grazing will be excluded until the following spring and the cycle will begin once again. 2A6AF:H:6>)<=)F4AY56F)A65HA9;Among the problems that face rangeland manager is the non-uniform distribution of grazing animals on the surface area of rangelands resulting in some patches exploited more than others do. Therefore, a higher uniformity in the distribution animal on rangelands is preferred.The nature of the dominant vegetation cover will dictate the use of sheep if it is herbaceous. In case of shrubs, bushes, and spiny vegetation, goats and camels are more favorable. The management plan to improve adjust the species composition. In case of grazing by different animal species, it should be noted that even if camels and small ruminants have different preferences rangeland types, it is essential to avoid grazing by small ruminants before camels. Both types of animals must graze the range at the same time. Camels refuse, in fact, to graze after the small ruminants. Furthermore, grazing annual plants in spring, essential for camels, should be favored in case of mixed grazing. In contrast, small ruminants are not embarrassed to graze in the areas frequented by a determining factor.Several accompanying measures may guarantee the uniform distribution of grazing animals on rangelands. A good distribution of watering points and shelters (shady areas) and services center (for concentrates and storage of food, veterinary treatments, …) may help in adapting and implementing a rotational grazing system. An assemblage of plants occurring together at any point in time, while denoting no particular successional status. A unit of vegetation.The interaction between organisms as a result of the removal or reduction of a common, required resource from the environment. Resources may include water, nutrients, light, oxygen, carbon dioxide, food and shelter. throughout a year or for that part of the year during which grazing is feasible. The term is not necessarily synonymous with yearlong grazing, since seasonal grazing may be involved. A preferred term is continuous stocking.A plowed or listed strip, commonly 8 to 18 inches deep and wide, made parallel to the horizontal contour for the purpose of water retention and reduction of soil erosion.Syn. prescribed burning.(1) The plant or plant parts, living or dead, on the surface of the ground. Vegetative cover or herbage cover is composed of living plants and litter cover of dead parts of plants. Syn. foliar cover (2) The area of ground covered by plants of one or more species. cf. basal area.For a given plant community, those species that decrease in practice.objective. A strategy aimed at providing time for plant reproduction, establishment of new plants, restoration of plant vigor, a return to environmental conditions appropriate for grazing, or the accumulation of forage for later use. cf. deferred grazing, rotational deferred.Species which contribute positively to the management objectives.Planting seed directly into the soil with a drill in rows, cf. broadcast seeding.Organisms together with their abiotic environment, forming A transition area of vegetation between two communities, having characteristics of both kinds of neighboring vegetation as well as characteristics of its own. Varies in width depending on site and climatic factors. cf. edge effect.A genetically differentiated subpopulation (race) that is ecotypes are observed only when different ecotypes are tested in a common environment, 2. ecotypes are generally subdivided into races, e.g., edaphic, climatic (termed cline), geographic (termed variety).Refers to the soil.Grazing management that utilizes relatively large land areas per animal and a relatively low level of labor, resources, or capital. cf. intensive grazing management.The animal life of a region. A listing of animal species of a region.(1) The plant species of an area. (2) A simple list of plant species or a taxonomic manual.(n.) Browse and herbage which is available and may provide food for grazing animals or be harvested for feeding . (v.) To search for or consume forage. cf. (v.) browse, graze.The weight of forage that is produced within a designated period of time on a given area. The weight may be expressed production. emergency use.An index to the grazing use that may be made for forage species that will maintain economically important forage species or to achieve other management objectives.Any broad-leafed herbaceous plant other than those in the Poaceae, Cyperaceae and Juncaceae families. cf. legume.Land on which the vegetation is dominated by grasses, grass like plants, and/or forbs (cf. dominant). Lands not presently grassland that were originally or could become grassland through naturalThe maximum stocking rate that will achieve based on total nutrient resources available, including harvested without deterioration of the ecosystem. A description of the grazing capacity should include stocking rate, grazing method, targeted animal performance and nongrazed nutrient resources.Dispersion of livestock grazing within a management unit or area.The percentage of material, other than bare ground, covering the land surface. It may include live and standing dead vegetation, litter, cobble, gravel, stones and bedrock. Ground cover plus bare ground would total 100 percent.A furrow, channel or miniature valley, usually with steep sides or snow melt. cf. arroyo and coulee.The collective area which one plant association occupies or will come to occupy as succession advances. The habitat type is environment. The concept was developed by Rexford Daubenmire. Habitat type is similar in concept to ecological site. The difference A perennial plant with a woody base whose annually produced stems die each year.A physiological condition of seed in which some viable seeds do not immediately absorb water or oxygen and germination is delayed when a favorable environment is provided. Non-synonymous with seed dormancy.A hardened soil layer in the lower A or in the B horizon caused by cementation of soil particles with organic matter or with materials such as silica, sesquioxides, or calcium carbonate. The hardness does not change appreciably with changes in moisture content, and pieces of the hard layer do not crumble in water. cf. caliche.A comparative term which indicates that the stocking rate of a pasture is relatively greater than that of other pastures. Often erroneously used to mean overuse. cf. light and moderate grazing.1. Non-woody plant growth. 2. A term often used to describe Holistic Management is a practical, goal-oriented approach to the management of the ecosystem including the human, use of a management model which incorporates a holistic view of land, people and other resources. Holistic Management is now the correct name for the approach formerly called Holistic Resource Management. https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about/protected-areacategories For a given plant community, those species that increase in practice.(1) Species that indicate the presence of certain environmental conditions, seral stages, or previous treatment. (2) One or more plant species selected to indicate a certain level of grazing use. cf. key species.A body of knowledge built up. by a group of people through generations of living in close contact with. Nature. Indigenous: Born, growing, or produced naturally (native) in an area, region, or country. Cf. endemic.The rate of movement of water from the soil surface into soil.Grazing management that attempts to increase production or utilization per unit area or production per animal through a relative increase in stocking rates, forage utilization, labor, resources, or capital. Intensive grazing management is not synonymous any one or more of a number of grazing methods that use relatively more labor or capital resources. Cf. extensive grazing management.The weight of a substance after it has been dried in which, if continued, will result in range deterioration. cf. overgrazing.(1) A grazing area that is a subdivision of a grazing management unit, and is enclosed and separated from other areas by a fence or barrier. (2) A relatively small enclosure used as an exercise and saddling area for horses, generally adjacent to stalls or stable. cf. grazing.The relish with which a particular species or plant part is consumed by an animal.Horizon or layer in soils that is strongly compacted, indurated, or very high in clay content. cf. caliche, claypan, hardpan.Grazing use of current growth usually expressed as a percent of the current growth (by weight) which has been removed. cf. degree of use.An assemblage of plants occurring together at any point in time, thus denoting no particular successional status. A unit of vegetation.Species that are preferred by animals and are burning.The rate of conversion of solar to chemical energy through the process of photosynthesis.A state of ecological stability or condition existing in the absence of direct disturbance by modern man.Any part of an organism, produced sexually or asexually that is capable of giving rise to a new individual.The act of continuously obtaining proper use.Placing a number of animals on a given area that will result in proper use at the end of the planned grazing period. Continued proper stocking will lead to proper grazing.An index to the grazing use that may be made of that will maintain the economically important forage species, or achieve other management objectives such as maintenance of watersheds, recreation values, etc.(a) a generic term relating to present status of a unit of range in be stated. (b) the present state of vegetation of a range site in relation to the climax (natural potential) plant community for that site. It is an expression of the relative degree to which the kinds, proportions, and amounts of plants in a plant community resemble that of the climax plant community for the site. This term is being phased out. Preferred terms are successional status and range similarity index.The process that leads to an irreversible reduction in capability of an ecological site to produce vegetation.Any activity or program on or relating to rangelands which is designed to improve production of forage, change vegetation composition, control patterns of use, provide water, stabilize soil and water conditions, or provide habitat for livestock and wildlife.A distinct discipline founded on ecological principles and dealing with the use of rangelands and range resources for a variety of purposes. These purposes include use as watersheds, wildlife habitat, grazing by livestock, recreation, and aesthetics, as well as other associated uses.Spots containing unusually large quantities of salts in the soil where animals consume the soil to obtain salt.(1) Synonymous with seasonal grazing, (2) Seasonal preference of certain plant species by animals.Mechanical or acid treatment of seed-coats to improve water absorption and enhance germination."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0052506326.json b/main/part_2/0052506326.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4050168c3a18f876f7adbb3de6bf1e8e101e81ea --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0052506326.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"39cbf375fd82734719644f0a44e6df1a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f229dedc-fa26-4930-b019-31bfa84f7447/content","id":"-1278116084"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7eb1f9c6-4f4d-4b3c-9ece-5c306fbb3740","content":"The thirteen principles of agroecology span the scientific, social policy and institutional landscape. The slow progress towards AEI can be traced in many cases, not to lack of policies, but effective coordination and implementation gaps. In this six-part bibliographic survey, we review the global landscape on policy coordination issues and related policy theories of change, institutions for agroecology, elements of food systems transformation, agroecological transitions, farming innovations for agroecologically sensitive production, and finally some examples from Africa. The review brings forward at least two critical gaps in the policy intention-implementation gap. The need for overarching agroecological policy theories of change to help coordinate individual policies as well as achieve inter-sectoral coordination.The Need for Agroecology Policy Coordination 1. The challenge of policy coordination https://doi.org/10. 1080/25741292.2018.1437946 Most of the issues, like climate change, that require much involvement of the government, call for coordination. There is no clearcut way of dealing with coordination concerns since its success or failure depends on the context, varying across countries and policy areas. Furthermore, some political systems may place more emphasis on coordination than others, depending on their approach. Policy coordination prevents unnecessary duplication, which could be more costly, and avoids contradicting steps among various organizations. For example, environmental agencies may want to reduce intensive agriculture for the sake of the environment, while the Ministry of Agriculture's target could be increasing productivity. These two moves could at some point be found contradictory despite having good political will. Moreover, policy coordination also ensures that the various changing needs and concerns, such as population growth and climate change, are well taken care of (Peters, 2018).https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378 Hudson et al. (2019) identified the following causes of policy failure: unrealistic expectations, lack of proper coordination among stakeholders during the making and implementation of policies, and the unpredictability of the political system. Nicholls and Altieri (2018) discovered that the major challenge is the broadening of the gap between promising policies and their implementation towards solving realistic and urgent issues in agroecological transition. Implementation support was found to be crucial since the experiences of the front-liners are brought on board as they are more knowledgeable than national policymakers (Allcock et al., 2015) on the challenge of policy implementation gaps. Capacity building is important as it empowers stakeholders with skills and capabilities to ensure sustainability in countering future implementation challenges (Hudson et al., 2019).https://doi.org/10. 1080/21683565.2018.1499578 Most of the research towards promoting agroecology focuses on social and policy aspects. The major challenge is practising the agroecological principles for soil, water, and biodiversity management to improve productivity and resilience. For agroecological economic sustainability, these principles have to be complemented by policies and harmonized market institutions (Nicholls & Altieri, 2018). However, there is no single policy that fits all, hence combination of complementary policies is necessary to incentivize agroecological transition (Nicholls & Altieri, 2018). Consequently, these policies can create unseen dependencies that may reduce the uptake of agroecology. For example, since credit access may encourage agroecological practices, it may result in more usage of agrochemicals. Nonetheless, there are effective policies that have proven to promote agroecology and Brazil's National School Feeding Program (PNAE) is of such kind. It brought about an economic incentive to small-scale farmers since the policy outlines that 30 percent of food that is procured for schools must be produced by these farmers (Wittman & Blesh, 2017).https://doi.org/10. 1080/13501763.2019.1617334 The extent and degree to which policies are integrated are influenced by how levels of government coordinate (May et al., 2006;Peters, 2015;Tosun and Lang, 2017). Many Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) usually constitute agriculture (FAO, 2017). Inasmuch as ministries play a vital role in policymaking, the Ministry of Agriculture has its own political interests and therefore does not participate in formulating climate policies because it is not consulted. Page (2003) argued that getting solutions that promote every ministry's agenda could enhance coordination between and amongst them. Making coordination look attractive to all the involved ministries is important (Peters, 2015), and if applied in this case, the involvement of the Ministry of Agriculture in making climate policies will promote the agri-climate idea (Schmidt, 2019).Framing the Transition:Policy Theories of Change 1. Large Leaps / Punctuated Equilibrium Theory https://resources.peopleinneed.net/documents/23-pathways-for-change-6-theories-about-how-policy-change-happens.pdf Baumgartner and Jones (1993) hold that right conditions can lead to a huge change from the current situation, although these conditions don't necessarily guarantee change. These conditions can be achieved when: the existing methodologies are questioned in trying to define a problem in a different way or trying to get other aspects of it; there is involvement of different actors; and the problem at hand gets more attention from the public and media. When all of these happen simultaneously, then a large-scale change happens.https://resources.peopleinneed.net/documents/23-pathways-for-change-6-theories-about-how-policy-change-happens.pdf This theory suggests that individuals have basic or primary beliefs which are common to all of them. It suggests that the knowledge of the urgency of the matter at hand, its cause and the people's ability to provide a solution is common to them all. As a result of shared concerns, coordination among these people would bring about policy change. This theory assumes that it is almost impossible to change policies if the group proposing the change doesn't have power (Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith, 1993;Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith ,1999).https://resources.peopleinneed.net/documents/23-pathways-for-change-6-theories-about-how-policy-change-happens.pdf According to Kingdon (1995), whether a matter gets attention or not depends on how the problem is defined, the kind of proposed solutions to the problem and the political environment, and each of these operates independently. The theory suggests that problem definition determines the urgency or priority it receives. People's values and beliefs determines their perceptions of problems.https://resources.peopleinneed.net/documents/23-pathways-for-change-6-theories-about-how-policy-change-happens.pdf Tversky and Kahneman (1981) research revealed that people make choices depending with how the options were framed or presented. Consequently, these choices can be inconsistent-can be of less benefit or riskier than anticipated-depending with the available information.https://resources.peopleinneed.net/documents/23-pathways-for-change-6-theories-about-how-policy-change-happens.pdfThe theory suggests that the power to influence policy change is held by the elites who are always a handful. They may consist of the politicians, leading professionals, religious leaders, senior civil servants and leaders of mass organisations. Therefore, identifying the right people who have the necessary influence for the particular policy matter and building rapport with them is very important to the process of policy change (Domhoff, 1990;Mills, 2000).https://resources.peopleinneed.net/documents/23-pathways-for-change-6-theories-about-how-policy-change-happens.pdf In his book Rules for Radicals, Alinsky (1989) challenges the power elites theory by proposing that power is dynamic and can therefore change, it is not just in the hands of the elites only. Supporters of this theory believe that the affected people, through collective action, can create power. Such effort is usually directed towards changing the existing policies (Alinsky, 1989).https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz081According to this theory, institutions do influence political and policy outcomes such that examining past contexts and events can give a reason for the failure or success of a policy change (Skocpol, 1995;Hall and Taylor, 1996). Historical institutionalists explain institutional and policy change as being path dependence. This means that current policy developments are influenced by what policymakers established in the past. This path is often rigid and therefore, any subsequent policy changes can't divert from it but can only be built on it. However, some scholars argue that major disruptions could lead to major institutional hence policy changes, away from the path, but would eventually stabilize (Koning, 2016).https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz081The theory suggests that the power to influence policy change is held by the elites who are always a handful. They may consist of the politicians, leading professionals, religious leaders, senior civil servants and leaders of mass organisations. Therefore, identifying the right people who have the necessary influence for the particular policy matter and building rapport with them is very important to the process of policy change (Domhoff, 1990;Mills, 2000). Policy makers then become instruments through which the elites push for their interests.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz081 This theory holds that policy changes are possible with social movements consisting of mass members. Furthermore, policy change requires collective action and therefore it involves working with communities on the ground and helping them form or join groups. This theory suggests that these movements are mostly shaped by political opportunities and challenges around them. The movements bring together and use resources and professional expertise to ensure success in changing policies (McAdam, 1999;McCarthy and Zald, 1977).https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz081 This theory proposes that disruptions from an uncooperating social movement can cause changes in policies. However, exercising this kind of power is not so easy because it is usually characterised by the breaking of rules and regulations. This theory contrasts with the resource mobilization theory in that it involves disruptions whereas the latter involves good organization. These social movements defy the status quo causing the power elites to concede and give in to their demands. This is not the case with resource mobilization theory as social movements seek the expertise of elites amicably. Furthermore, this theory is mostly applicable to the marginalised groups (Piven, 2006).The Bog Picture:Institutions for Agroecological 1. Institutionalizing Agroecology in France: Social Circulation Changes the Meaning of an Idea https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10051380 Bellon and Ollivier (2018) demonstrated that the agroecological idea varied in its definition across educational, civic, scientific, policy and economic fields and how this variation affected the institutionalisation of agroecology in France. They defined institutionalisation as the process of making collective action feasible through connections and liaisons between different actors towards a shared concern. This paper concluded that institutionalization of agroecology resulted from the following: presence of actors who had been working in the South; differences between actors and meanings of agroecology; and activities to promote discursive strategies. The implementation and institutionalisation of policies supporting agroecological transition in Brazil, for example, the Brazilian National Plan for Agroecology and Organic Pro-duction (PLANAPO), has of recent gained international attention (Borsatto, Souza-Esquerdo, & Duval, 2022). However, the introduction of a policy paradigm as a result of political changes brought about a dismantling of some of the existing policies whose support towards agroecological transition had yielded meaningful results (Niederle et al., 2022). Just as Bellon and Ollivier (2018), this study recommends the creation of relationships and associations that would promote the reformation of institutions advocating for agroecological policies.https://doi.org/10.1002/uar2.20010The impoverished and food-insecure populations of South African metropoles are a growing concern, and studies reveal that any serious agroecological transition depends on the willingness and means of the state to regulate food systems (Collier & Lakoff, 2015). This dependence relies on premeditated discussions between the government and agroecological movements. Kroll (2021) revealed that the capability of the state to foster agroecological transition is hindered by the disintegration of institutional structures, which is one of the biopolitical techniques to impact the behavior of the population. The study argues that these institutions are full of bureaucracies and is in agreement with (Govender & Reddy, 2015). Food security is under the jurisdiction of national, provincial, and local departments, resulting in priority competition. Moreover, locally, this mandate is left to poorly funded departments that are understaffed and full of political uncertainties. This eventually limits coordination efforts between the levels of governance.https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091447This review, which covered two countries-Benin and Burkina Faso-sought to find out the political, economic, individual, institutional, and social factors influencing agroecological production in these nations. The study revealed that regional agricultural policies significantly influence national policies. These two countries, being members of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), have agricultural policies influenced by 'The Agricultural Policy of the Economic Community of West African States' (ECOWAP) (Salifou, 2020). Although these regional policies strive to avoid duplicating efforts in pursuing shared objectives (Salifou, 2020), they don't support agroecology. ECOWAP, for example, prioritizes intensifying agriculture and the intensive usage of chemical inputs (CEDEAO, 2006), and its influence on the formulation of national policies may result in a lack of institutional support for agroecological activities. Despite inadequate support, agroecological initiatives in Burkina Faso and Benin are developing and diversifying and are led by farmers' organizations, NGOs, and research and training faculties. Furthermore, the formation of the Alliance for Agroecology in West Africa aimed to coordinate various stakeholders in the agroecological transition (Tapsoba et al., 2020).1. Understanding Farm Diversity to Promote Agroecological Transitions https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10124337The study was conducted on farms located in Zona da Mata, Minas, Brazil, featuring a diverse range of farmers. Over the past 30 years, various stakeholders have been engaged in agroecological transitions in this region. Brazil is often linked with negative externalities such as social exclusion and rural poverty (Reydon, Fernandes & Telles, 2015). Existing evidence indicates that the progress of agroecological practices is contingent upon farmers having secure land rights (Rosset, 2013).The study delved into the diversification of farms and its implications for agroecological transition. The findings revealed that farmers' management techniques, practices, and principles exhibit variations during agroecological transformations. The acknowledgment of peasant information is crucial in supporting agroecology. Agroecological farmers were found to be affiliated with networks comprising NGOs, farmer's organizations, and universities. The study suggests that merging quantitative and participatory approaches can yield more accurate and meaningful assessments of agroecological transformations. Additionally, agroecological farms have the potential to provide a variety of ecosystem services, as they are associated with increased crop diversity (Teixeira et al., 2018). The recent institutionalization of agroecology into some countries' national policies can be seen as a step towards agroecological transition (Bacon et al., 2014). Studies have identified technological, political, and financial factors that either support or hinder agroecological transition, but there has been limited analysis of their interactions (Silici, 2014). This paper aims to address this gap by examining the progression of agroecological systems through a set of actors and institutions that interact in the field of technology, thereby contributing to the creation, circulation, and application of innovative technology-a system referred to as Technological Innovation Systems (TIS). This approach was employed to identify barriers to the diffusion of agroecology in Nicaragua.The findings indicate that some hindrances to agroecological transition include policy mismatches, insufficient capacities and resource mobilization, and the inadequate development of markets. These factors weaken entrepreneurial opportunities and experimentation (Schiller et al., 2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00688-x.The study aimed to investigate the impact of farm management practices on income and working conditions of farms at different stages of agroecological transition. Indicators of income, working conditions, and ecological management were assessed in both agroecological and conventional tobacco farms. The study revealed higher yields in diversified agroecological farms compared to their counterparts. This finding aligns with the results of Ponisio et al. (2015) and Dainese et al. (2019), who observed a positive relationship between farm diversification practices and productivity. In cases where sufficient support systems and policies were in place, there was potential for improved working conditions and increased profits, leading to higher household income in farms undergoing agroecological transitions. This improvement was attributed to reduced costs and access to diversified markets (Stratton, Wittman & Blesh, 2021). The paper sought to explore the ways in which farmers in Bikita, Zimbabwe, engaged in agroecological farming. These farmers were characterized by a lack of resources, relying on the natural environment, local information, and social networks. Moreover, crop diversity, agroecological techniques, and income from primary sources distinguished these farmers from their counterparts. These farmers recognized that crop diversification led to improved food and nutrition security, aligning with the findings of Mango et al. (2018) and Waha et al. (2018). Additionally, agroecological farmers employed sustainable irrigation practices, reducing environmental degradation, increasing productivity, and conserving water to a greater extent. However, the study identified the main challenge facing these agroecological farmers in Bikita as inadequate capacity to sustainably adhere to agroecological principles. Furthermore, existing support mechanisms such as institutions and policies did not recognize agroecological farming, leading to constant resistance (Mapfumo et al., 2022).https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2015.1130765Gliessman (2016) identified five levels of agroecological transition. The first step focuses on improved resource efficiency by reducing or completely eliminating the use of costly and environmentally degrading inputs. The second level is referred to as input substitution, whereby external input-intensive and environmentally degrading products and practices are replaced with those based on natural products and are more environmentally friendly, for example, organic farming. However, the agroecosystem at this level remains unaltered and therefore is very likely to face the same problems encountered in levels one.While levels one and two are incremental, levels three to five are transformational (HLPE, 2019).Level three involves redesigning the agroecosystem to eliminate the recurring problems in levels one and two. This would include practices like agroforestry and multiple-cropping. Level four encompasses reconnecting producers and consumers through farmers' markets or fair trade in food products, resulting in social equity and responsibility. Lastly, level five builds a new global food system based on participation, localness, fairness, and justice. This level is no longer about transitioning but transforming.https://doi.org/10.3390/land9060205The assumption that agroecological farming is more fulfilling than conventional farming, based on the independence of workers, requires reconsideration. This is because most existing labor channels portray farm laborers as technical demonstrators (Sachet et al., 2021) rather than drivers of change. This result is due to the implementation of organic standards that are not properly coordinated and reliance on foreign aid. Pressure on the laborers is further worsened by deteriorating climatic conditions and the fact that the Senegalese agricultural sector has been neoliberalized. The study suggests that agroecological initiatives should be tackled more holistically by institutionalizing safeguarded markets. This should happen even as farmers participate in governing the agroecosystem, establishing contractual agreements such as fair trade and organic certifications, and gaining access to land and other natural and productive resources.Furthermore, engaging in a participatory approach in creating agroecological knowledge while considering peasant information would also play a role in agroecological transitioning. This is in agreement with Teixeira et al. (2018), who discovered that recognizing peasant information is fundamental in supporting agroecology. Moreover, advocating and politicizing agroecology through NGOs and farmers' associations could also be a step towards a just agroecological transition in Sub-Saharan Africa (Bottazzi et al., 2020). Making strong political choices and negotiations is unavoidable when it comes to agroecological transitioning (Côte et al., 2019). 2019) also propose new performance indicators to capture the contribution of these transitions to sustainable development goals and to measure the ability of the applied systems to reduce inequalities and create employment opportunities. Sachet et al. (2021) propose that, to promote agroecological transition, the scope of agroecological research in addressing the processes of these transitions in Africa needs to be broadened using participatory action research and other participatory and empowering approaches.In India, women-run farms face unequal access to productive resources such as land, labor, and inputs due to poverty and unequal distribution of resources as a result of gender discrimination. Formation of women-only farming groups has helped alleviate this problem through labor-pooling, collectively speaking against exploitations and sharing capital investments (Agarwal 2010). Support from NGOs has seen these women groups purchase or lease land to improve food security through agroecological practices. Such inclusivity has led to a change in food systems beyond small-scale farms (Agarwal and Herring, 2013) Food Systems Transformation (as a transitional pathway)1. Transforming food systems with agroecology https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn%2Fnqab315Majority of those who advocate for food systems transformation agree that it has to promote availability, accessibility, affordability of a sufficient, nutritious, desirable, and safe diet for the population (Fanzo et al., 2021). Such should come from resilient and sustainable food systems (von Braun et al., 2021). Availability means that staple foods rich in nutrients are available for everyone and as they efficiently move along the food chain, they are made more accessible to people. There needs to be a change in eating behaviour by embracing more healthier diet options which should be more affordable and sustainable with food system transformation (Fanzo et al., 2021 andKennedy et al., 2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.09.021Boer et al. ( 2021) conducted a study on research and innovation as a catalyst for food system transformation. The paper provided insights into the complexities in food system transformation, the kind of research and innovation required for food system transformation, the challenges of current research and innovation strategies, and connecting food research and policy. The complexities in food system transformation call for the development, implementation, and evaluation of integrated governance strategies. Multi-level governance is necessary to develop integrated food policies that can alleviate the negative tradeoffs and, at the same time, increase collaborations between diverse sectors and policy domains (Moragues-Faus et al., 2017;Parsons & Hawkes, 2018;). The paper suggests a need for transdisciplinary research approaches that bring together both academic and non-academic actors whose combined knowledge (Luederitz et al., 2017) helps in understanding systems for change implementation (Fazey et al., 2018). In addition, this approach incorporates underrepresented actors and their perceptions (Abson et al., 2017). Strong R&I frameworks based on holistic and participatory approaches involving all stakeholders may help to identify opportunities but also vulnerabilities nested in the system, which are vital starting points from which to formulate resilience strategies (FAO, 2014).https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0519-1Most agricultural policies focus on food supply, and this paper suggests that the policies should also align with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Caron et al. (2018) proposed a comprehensive food system transformation. The first part is related to food consumption behavior, which requires support through advantageous food ecosystems for its sustainability (HLPE, 2017b). The second part of the transformation included the support of inclusive, nutrition-sensitive agricultural production, processing, distribution, and marketing, and sustainable food value chains. Thirdly, the transformation was supposed to deal with climate change by employing Climate-Smart Agriculture (FAO, 2013) to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (Lipper et al., 2014). Last but not least, the transformation was to foster a reawakening of rural territories so that people are empowered to develop their visions and implement useful activities toward sustainable development. This would definitely result in a food and nutrition-secure society, creation of decent jobs, steady economic growth, and a decrease in community conflicts (Mercandalli & Losch, 2017).One size doesn't fit all: regional differences in priorities for food system transformation https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01222-3A study by Dengerink et al. (2021) shows that different regions have different priorities and strategies concerning food system transformation. In the Near East and Latin America, food safety and sustainability are the prioritized challenges, respectively. While food availability is the most critical challenge in East and Southern Africa, the Asians in Asia identify nutritional quality as the most urgent food system challenge. However, the affected groups were found to be similar across the regions: small-scale farmers, women, and low-income cadre. The strategies adopted to resolve these challenges also vary across regions. Increasing productivity is perceived to be the game-changer for food availability, just as making healthy diets accessible addresses the nutritional needs of the population (Dengerink et al., 2021). However, recent developments in food system transformation focus on those strategies that bring about availability and access to healthy diets (FAO, 2020; IFAD, 2021), resilient food systems (Béné, 2020;De Steenhuijsen et al., 2021;Savary et al., 2020), and a change in consumer behavior (Webb et al., 2020;WEF, 2020). In addition, they propose a combination of social and technical innovation as another strategy to effect a transformation in food systems (Barret et al., 2020;Pereira et al., 2020;Reardon et al., 2019).https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw052 Schipanski et al. (2016) outlined several strategies that together enhance the resilience of food systems across levels. The first strategy is the integration of social justice and gender equity into food systems transformation. This is because of the contribution of women in food production and ensuring the nutritional needs of their families. This strategy would, therefore, enhance food security. The second one involves replacing the use of external chemical inputs in farms with ecological processes. This would ensure sustainability (Godfray & Garnett, 2014;Ponisio et al. 2015) through the restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem functionality. The third proposed strategy is regionalizing food distribution linkages. Such diversification will ensure little to no disturbances of food availability in the occurrence of shocks. In addition, such regionalization could also increase innovation (Ostrom, 2010). Although still on a small scale, the Deccan Development Society (DDS) and women's groups in India have community grain bin initiatives to cushion the community against disruptions in distribution and production systems (Agarwal 2010).More emphasis on food productivity has exerted pressure on the use of resources (Steffen et al. 2015). Addressing this challenge could mean that agricultural policies be informed by goals of the public health sector, hence to some extent, human behavior. Such an approach pays attention to the type of food produced, by whom, and for whom, which results in both increased productivity and human health (Schipanski et al., 2016). For example, in supporting the integration of agroecology and human health in Malawi, through the Soils, Food, and Healthy Community Project (SFHC), farmers tested the effectiveness of intercropping legumes as an alternative to external fertilizers (Msachi et al. 2009). Elisabeth and Martin ( 2022) carried out a study on the effects of perceptions on how farmers in Burkina Faso adopt and intensify agroecological methods. The major goal for households in Burkina Faso is to meet their food needs (Sawadogo et al., 2022), which is often not easy to meet due to poverty and unfertile soils. The research found out that farmers view agroecology as a means to increase food adequacy. In addition, the experience of farmers reinforced agroecological practices. However, it was discovered that agroecology was less practiced in large cultivated areas. The study suggested that in promoting agroecology in Burkina Faso, it is important to emphasize on the ability of agroecological practices to meet the food needs of the population since that it is what their goal is.https://afsafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/water_harvesting_zimbabwe.pdf Even though maize is the staple crop for Zimbabwe, it is dependent on rain which makes it highly susceptible to droughts. Efforts by the government to integrate crops and livestock have not been successful due to the existing land use structures that are not flexible. However, a case study done on one of the farmers revealed a success story of adapting agroecological practices. The farmer discovered ways of harvesting and controlling water in his land and in so doing, he not only controlled soil erosion but also ensured that every rainfall drop was used maximumly. Furthermore, the farmer planted both indigenous and exotic trees, employed intercropping and crop rotation techniques. For the sake of sustaining nitrogen levels in the soil, he incorporated legumes. Consequently, the farmer witnessed an increase in the productivity and resilience of his farm (Oakland & AFSA, 2019). This shows the efforts towards agroecological transition. A case study conducted in Adjumani and Amuria Districts of Uganda revealed that women only had secondary rights to the use of land. Lack of information concerning their rights resulted in their vulnerability to land grabbing. It was realized how unlikely it was for these women to practice sustainable agroecological methods. Eastern and Southern Africa Small Scale Farmers Forum (ESAFF) and Oxfam have been educating and equipping women farmers on the importance of securing access to their land.During the study, one of the respondents had this to say, \"If I don't own the land, why do I invest time in improving or protecting the soil? They will take it away from me anyway.\" Therefore, gender equality in land rights has proven to promote agroecological practices, hence increased productivity and food security, since ownership comes with independence in decision-making. This study demonstrates the role of institutions in advocating for land rights, hence promoting agroecological transition. Women farmers in Casamance face various constraints, including lack of access to capital, illiteracy, lack of inclusivity in national agricultural policy formulation, and pressure by the government and private sector to incorporate farming techniques that involve hybrid seeds and associated inputs. Women, therefore, form women groups and associations, as part of their community efforts to find solutions to their challenges. Consequently, women who could not access capital can now get grants, enabling them to farm on large farms and engage in value addition to their products. They have also lobbied for inclusion in district councils and local institutions to participate in formulating agricultural policies (Oakland & AFSA, 2019). This study portrays an example of how policy coordination and collective action through institutions can accomplish significant resultshttps://afsafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cipcre.pdfThe use of chemical inputs has, for a long time, drained the soil of its moisture and nutrient content, hence its fertility. As a result, food insecurity crops in. Funded by Bread for the World (Germany), the Project for Adaptation to Climate Change (Pada-Clim-Benin) has teamed up with farmers to discover sustainable farming techniques that are resistant to climate change, bringing about prolonged droughts. The project targets family farms and trains them on crop rotation techniques, how to make and use biopesticides and biofertilizers, water conservation for dry seasons, and agroforestry in a bid to increase productivity. The fact that women farmers are the principal actors in the project ensures gender equality (Zossou, 2020). This study is a successful example that agroecological transition is possible amidst climate change and could offer a solution to the same. This study's focus was on Multi-purpose Cooperative Institutions (MPCI), which are community-based and come in handy in supporting small-scale farmers. The goals of MPCIs include ensuring sustainable ways of addressing food insecurity, increasing the production of cash crops and food, and promoting the sustainable management of resources. They provide an avenue through which various stakeholders interact to come up with hybrid initiatives. These institutions are characterized by a bottomup network system, which makes it easier for members to identify and collectively tackle constraints like labor shortage. They also distribute agricultural inputs and promote the best farming techniques in the bid to enhance food security. However, their operations and activities are hindered by elites and government agencies whose influence on the food system transformation is much more (Manlosa et al., 2022). This study, therefore, confirms the importance of institutions in the transformation of the food system.CGIAR is a global research partnership for a food-secure future. CGIAR science is dedicated to transforming food, land, and water systems in a climate crisis. Its research is carried out by 13 CGIAR Centers/Alliances in close collaboration with hundreds of partners, including national and regional research institutes, civil society organizations, academia, development organizations and the private sector. www.cgiar.orgWe would like to thank all funders who support this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund: www.cgiar.org/funders.To learn more about this initiative, please visit this webpage.To "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0055241296.json b/main/part_2/0055241296.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1ede8b636b0442ab5c1e23aa8bbd5391048a1ae3 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0055241296.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"12776b1e298c8523270d42961b7eadb2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b2a85800-be8b-4dad-bbd8-7a231b590609/retrieve","id":"-191950892"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"976e8585-221b-4606-8860-b067a529515c","content":"CIP publications contribute important development information to the public arena. Readers are encouraged to quote or reproduce material from them in their own publications. As copyright holder CIP requests acknowledgement and a copy of the publication where the citation or material appears. Please send a copy to the Communications Department at the address below.Summary of key findings and recommendations for improving the seed potato value chain in Rwanda Table 2. Average land (ha) dedicated to potato production in the major agro-ecological zones (AEZ) during the period of 2017 to 2022 and the contribution (%) of each (AEZ) for the three growing seasons .................. Table 3 6. Current status of public and privately owned potato tissue culture laboratories in Rwanda ................ Table 7. Number 8. List of available public and private owned screenhouses used for minitubers production in Rwanda. Table 9. Seed potato production trends for the period 2018 Direct transfer This is a rapid method for the production of pre-basic seed potato achieved by directly transplanting in-vitro plantlets under field conditionsSeed directly controlled by the plant breeder whose production complies with the plant breeding principles from which all other seed classes are produced (Seed Law, 2016).A product of plant tissue culture. It is a starter planting material for seed potato production. The plant tissue culture or micropropagation serves to multiply disease-free planting materials (Seed Law, 2016)A progeny tuber produced from in vitro-derived plantlets or microtubers. These microtubers are characterized by their size, being smaller than conventional seed tubers but larger than in vitro microtubers cultivated under aseptic conditions on artificial media. Minitubers may be produced in conventional, aeroponics, or sandponics screenhousesSeed of the generation directly derived from breeder seed under the direct control of the plant breeder or his duly accredited representative (Seed Law, 2016).Approved progeny of pre-basic seed produced by seed growers authorized by the competent authority (Seed Law, 2016).Seed tuber is produced from the multiplication of basic seeds whose quality has been approved through a legally recognized certification process (Seed Law 2016).A product of formal breeding programs that have undergone testing and a formal release process.Seed tubers produced from basic or certified seed, are declared by the producer as being in conformity with technical, identity, and quality standards governing seed production and approved by the competent authority after the verification of the quality (Seed Law, 2016). This usually happens when a registered seed field is downgraded for failing to meet all the requirements for certified seed.Quality seed potato is the most important agricultural input that determines the final tuber yield and drives the productivity of other agricultural inputs in potato production systems. Rwanda currently produces less than 5% of the required disease-free seed potato, creating a substantial seed availability gap of over 95%. Much of the yield gap currently constraining productivity in the country is attributed to poor seed quality. The low yields have largely been attributed to high prevalence of seed-borne pests and diseases, notably late blight, bacterial wilt, nematodes, and viruses.This study presents a valuable review of the current situation of seed potato production, including key stakeholders' roles in the current production of different seed generations, the capacity to produce different seed classes, and the provision of support services to seed producers. The findings of the needs assessment study conducted between June and August 2023 informed the development of a five-year seed potato plan (2024-2028) for synchronizing seed potato production of different actors through sector coordination to match the supply and demand of seed potato.Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used to collect data. Desk review of seed potato-related policies, strategies, regulations, publications, and reports. Key informant interviews (KII) involving government officials, private sector representatives, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to gain supplementary insights on the factors influencing the efficiency of the seed potato value chain. Structured and semi-structured questionnaires for individual interviews with seed potato producers, ware potato farmers, and ware potato traders, while focus group discussions (FGDs) were organized to validate the results obtained from individual surveys.The study revealed strong government support to the seed potato sector as evidenced in high uptake of seed potato technologies in terms of the number of rapid multiplication technologies (RMT-aeroponics, sandponics) by both the public and private sectors, alongside the establishment of early generation seed (EGS) facilities-67 screenhouse in the country used for minituber production. The number of improved varieties officially registered in the county as wells the seed potato storage technologies notably diffused light stores-54 DLS in the country and one cold storage. This extensive network of storage EGS and storage facilities plays a crucial role in the seed potato value chain, ensuring that high-quality seeds are available for agricultural purposes.Compared to the neighboring countries, Rwanda is leading in the adoption of these seed potato technologies.Similarly, the number of private seed potato multipliers in the country-40 registered comprising of organizations (17.5%), Cooperatives (15%) and individual farmers (67.5%) is a good indicator on the value proposition of seed potato business. Currently the country boasts a surplus production of in vitro plantlets, serving as the foundational material for seed production. Most of the potato traders interviewed, 87% reported that varieties with red skin color such as Kinigi, Gikungu, Kerekezo are mostly preferred by consumers compared to potato varieties with white skin color. Due to its short dormancy period and tolerance to disease and acidic soil, Cruza variety was reported by 69% of ware potato farmers interviewed to have gained preference in the potato growing districts of the southern part of the country.In Rwanda, the public sector dominates EGS, while the private sector dominates certified seed potato production. There are five (2 public and 3 private) tissue culture (TC) laboratories in the country used for the production of in-vitro plantlets, and RAB is the main producer of in vitro plantlets, with a share of 70% of total plantlets production since 2019. The study showed a low operational capacity for privately owned TC laboratories. For example, the TC laboratories owned by INES-Ruhengeri and Agriseeds African Ltd are currently operating at 13% and 8% capacity, respectively.The focused group discussion (FGDs) revealed that the low operational capacity for private TC laboratories is mainly due to flow demand for in vitro plantlets. The private plantlet producers raised a concern that plantlets from RAB are subsidized while plantlets produced by the private TC laboratories are not subsidized, resulting in higher unit prices. Whilst the subsidy program is beneficial to smallholder farmers by enhancing accessibility to certified seed thereby increasing the use of quality seed leading to increased productivity farm incomes and food security, the subsidy has adverse effects on the sustainability of the seed potato industry particularly if the subsidy does not cover the private sector. According to the FGDS, the seed sector should be private sector led.There is a total of 67 facilities used for minituber production in Rwanda, owned by both public (7) and private sectors (60). Different seed production systems are used in these screen houses: 5 have adopted sandponics technology, 6 have installed aeroponics systems and the remaining 56 uses conventional methods for minituber production. However, only 46 (69%) of these facilities are currently operational: 5 sandponics, 5 aeroponics facilities, and 36 conventional screen houses. The remaining 21 (31%) facilities are nonfunctional. During the face-to-face interviews, the owners of the 21 non-functional screenhouses attributed this to the high cost of inputs, low demand for an unstructured market for minitubers, and a lack of funds for rehabilitation.A gap analysis revealed low productivity along the seed potato value chain from EGS production through to certified seed. The average minituber productivity is 6 and 35 minituber/plantlet under conventional and aeroponics production systems respectively. This production is far below the expected production of 8 -10 and more than 50 minitubers/plantlet under good conventional and aeroponics management with varietal differences. Thus, there is a need to optimize the production of EGS to close the EGS gap and in the subsequent seed generations.Similarly, the average production of pre-basic, basic, and certified seed potato as reported by a majority, 88% of 24 the seed producers interviewed reported 10 tons/ha, 12 tons/ha, and 15 tons/ha, respectively, way below the attainable yield of 20-30 t/ha recorded by some progressive smallholder farmers. The seed producers attributed the low productivity to inefficiency in the seed production systems coupled with inadequate knowledge and skills. Although most of the seed potato producers reported to have attended training from various organizations including RAB, MINAGRI, and NGOs, these trainings are poorly interlinked thereby missing out on synergies and layering.The study revealed that of the total volume of seed potatoes produced between 2018 and 2023 as per the RAB and RICA annual reports, merely 7% comprises certified seed, while the larger proportion consists of QDS and PS. This indicates that a significant portion of the Early Generation Seed (EGS) is not utilized for certified seed purposes, but rather downgraded to quality declared seed (QDS), or it is used to produce positively selected seed (PS) or end up as ware potatoes.While QDS holds legal recognition and significantly enhances seed accessibility for farmers, the overarching objective remains to augment the prevalence of certified seed within the country. Certified seed surpasses all quality standards, whereas QDS represents a lower tier of certified seed due to partial compliance with these requirements. Considering that superior seed quality substantially enhances yield potential, the adoption of certified seed is highly commendable.The discussion during the FDGs revealed a lack of harmonized training and graduation mechanisms for seed potato producers. Further, the study revealed the absence of joint planning and/or implementation of seed potato-related activities between public institutions (RAB, RICA, RSB) and other organizations. In some cases, this resulted in overlapping /duplication of activities, and this makes it difficult to assess the impact of some of these interventions.The National Seed Association of Rwanda (NSAR) and Potato Consortium are the two main forums for coordinating the seed industry for all crops in the country. Seed potato producers are expected to be members of the two fora. However, only 38.5% of the seed potato producers interviewed reported to be members of the NSAR. This means that most of the seed potato producers miss the opportunity to work together in joint planning and coordination, market linkages, and collaborative planning.In terms of compliance with seed inspection and certification standards, the study revealed a high level of rejection of seed potato fields. Whilst the price of seed potato is jointly set by seed potato stakeholders through a participatory process, and all seed potato agro-dealers adhere to the price set for each seed category, in some cases, the price of seed potato is lower than the price of ware potatoes. Over 70% of seed potato producer's respondents affirmed that the price of ware potato is sometimes higher than the price of the seed and in some isolated cases, a few seed potato producers sell their seed as ware potatoes.Concerning marketing, the study revealed unstructured market linkages among seed potato actors. The channels for information sharing and receiving feedback from farmers, seed potato producers, and agro-dealers are nonexistent. The FGDs indicated that most EGS producers fail to get clients because of the absence of this communication channel among actors.Based on these key findings, strategic recommendations aimed at enhancing the seed potato industry in Rwanda across various thematic areas have been formulated as summarized in Table 1.Thematic Area Key Findings -Constraints and Gaps Recommendations• There is limited involvement of potato value chain actors in designing the breeding objectives leading to:• Development of varieties with non-farmer preferred traits • Low adoption rate.• Increase funding for potato breeding programs.• Involve end-users of potatoes in breeding programs to develop marketed preferred potato varieties meeting the market demand and increase the adoption rate.• There are five (2 public and 3 private) tissue culture (TC) laboratories in the country used to produce in-vitro plantlets.• RAB is the main producer of in vitro plantlets, with a share of 70% of total plantlets production since 2019.• Low operational capacity of privately owned tissue culture laboratories e.g. TC labs of INES-Ruhengeri and Agriseeds African Ltd currently operate at 12.5% and 7.5% capacity, respectively, while the laboratory of The University of Rwanda is not functional.• Dysfunctional screenhouses are attributed to high operation costs and an unstructured market for minitubers.• Increase investment in TC facilities.• Support the rehabilitation of non-operational TC facilities to ensure their full operation.• Embrace new technologies and innovations.• Encourage/support private sector engagement.• Encourage public-private partnerships to increase the availability of TC plantlets• Less than 5% certified seed availability in the country locking out most of the smallholder farmers who have to rely on an informal seed system.• Low productivity along the seed potato value chain from EGS production through to certified seed.• 70% of the 67 facilities used for minituber production in the country are currently operational.• Increase investment in EGS facilities while embracing new technologies and innovations.• Encourage/support private sector engagement.• Establish and support public-private partnerships that increase the availability of market-preferred varieties.• Strengthen the technical capacity and business skills of seed multipliers to optimize seed potato production across the seed categories.• Non-functional screenhouses (30%) are attributed to the high cost of inputs, low demand and unstructured market for minitubers, and lack of funds.• A meager 7% of the total volume of seed potato produced between 2018-2023 comprise certified seed.• The larger proportion consists of QDS (33%) and PS (60%)• This indicates that a significant portion of the Early Generation Seed (EGS) is not utilized for certified seed purposes, but rather downgraded to QDS.• Support rehabilitation of non-operational minituber facilities and/or introduce/deployment of new rapid multiplication technologies.• Create awareness/promote the use of quality seeds and good agricultural practices.• While QDS holds legal recognition and significantly enhances seed accessibility for farmers, the overarching objective remains to augment the prevalence of certified seed within the country.• Adoption of certified seed should be promoted.• Over 20% of the registered seed potato fields are rejected which in turn reduces the volume of certified seeds and loss of income to seed producers.• Disease prevalence (Late blight and bacterial wilt) are major causes of field rejection.• Limited trained staff for regulating and enforcing quality standards.• Lack of post-certification and traceability system• Increase investment in the institutional capacity of RICA in potato pest and disease, diagnostics skills, field inspection and certification.• Finalize and operationalize the new seed potato inspection and certification protocols -harmonized protocols and Standards• Create extensive awareness of the seed potato certification protocols and benefits of certified seed.• Strengthen the technical and regulatory capacity of seed multipliers on good seed production practices, disease.• Design capacity-building programs and set out graduation mechanisms for seed potato value chain actors (seed producers, agro-dealers, distributors processors, extensionists, stockiest, etc).• Strengthen /establish and support a seed forum for sharing information, ideas, and practices, and provide feedback mechanisms on GAPs and quality control.• Support seed multipliers to build an internal quality control program.• Digitised seed potato registration and inspection services.• Build capacity of seed inspectors in diagnostics and inspections.• Improve the regulatory environment to better support the seed potato value chain.• Low adoption rate of newly released potato varieties.• low adoption rate is attributed to weak extension services and their low participation/involvement in a variety of development and selection.• Encourage participatory breeding to allow farmers to have a say in the development of market-preferred varieties. Conduct participatory adaptative and marketing trials on new varieties in different climatic zones under different agronomic practices and disease management.• Awareness creation of new potato varieties and good agricultural practices through field demonstration plots, field days, and other extension approaches.• Strengthen and support agricultural extension staff and other stakeholders on seed production including promoting eextension.• Lack of well-established distribution channels and marketing structure.• Weak market linkages between producer's ad users of seed • Limited seed storage structures.• Lack of information-sharing channels/platforms.• Lack of data on effective seed potato demand for each category of seed potato.• Unregulated potato seed market. It's difficult to differentiate certified and non-certified seeds on the market.• Increase investment for establishing /strengthening marketing and distribution channels for seed potato.• Strengthen the agribusiness and marketing skills of seed potato actors (agro-dealers, distributors processors, extensionists, stockiest, and others).• Strengthen /establish and support a seed potato marketing forum for sharing information on seed demand and supply and providing feedback mechanisms on seed quality.• Promote/increase access to appropriate storage technologies.• Create extensive awareness of the benefits of certified seed potatoes.Access to credit and finance service• Low access to credit and finance for seed potato business development which in turn has led to low investment in sector• Increase access to affordable finance -partners with financial institutions to design and promote affordable financial products tailored to seed potato business.• Strengthen/support seed multipliers to form saving groups for internal funding• Lack of structured, formalized, and centralized seed potato forum for stakeholder engagement and sector coordination: including sharing data and information and joint planning• Low membership of seed potato producers in industry forums (NSAR and Potato Consortium).• Strengthen linkages and collaboration through stakeholder engagement, to guide the sector, mobilize resources, promote synergies, and minimize duplication.• Establish and support a seed potato forum for information management and sharing, stakeholder engagement 2.Potato commercial production in the country's Eastern province is slowly gaining momentum. This area is becoming a food store of the country due to the availability of large parcels of land for agricultural activities making it possible to adopt farm mechanization under irrigation systems. Maize, beans, and soybean farmers and seed producers in the Eastern province have started to adopt potatoes as a rotation crop in their production system. In this regard, there is a need for the development and/or promotion of potato variety adapted to these merging zones to maximize potato productivity and profitability. Much of the yield gap currently constraining productivity in the country is attributed to poor seed quality.Rwanda currently produces less than 5% of the required disease-free seed potato, creating a substantial seed availability gap of over 95%. Thus a vast majority of potato farmers relies on seed sourced from informal systems, including farmers' on-farm saved seed, tubers from ware potato markets, or neighboring farmers (RAB 2023).Remarkably, even with these low yields, potato farmers currently realize an average of RWF 1,200,000/ha (970 USD/ha) as profit, indicating the high inherent value of the crop (RAB, 2022). This highlights the possibility of a 2-4-fold increase in profit if the sector can overcome its challenges. Doubling yields with ~40% of farmers would result in a 0.4% increase in potato value. Importantly, there is increasing demand for fresh potatoes in the county and from the neighboring countries. A study conducted by Selinawamucii (2023), revealed a substantial demand for potatoes from neighboring countries like Uganda and Tanzania. Currently exports of potato products are minimal, representing less than 1% of total production.Whereas potato is a priority crop under Rwanda's production system, its optimal production is constrained by many challenges: limited supply of quality seed, small and fragmented potato production land, poor market Approximately 90% of potato varieties grown in Rwanda have been developed by RAB with the support of CIP.These varieties are known for their robust traits such as high tuber yield, climate-resilient, resistance to disease and pest, heat and drought tolerance, early maturity and good processing qualities.Combined, the efforts by various organizations over time have improved the potato value chain including expansion of production area, increase in annual tonnage of potatoes produced and increased in number of improved potato varieties available for farmers among others. However, the performance of the potato value chain is still below its optimal in terms of productivity (about 9 t/ha). Much of the yield gap currently constraining productivity in the country is attributed to poor seed quality. The low yields have largely been attributed to high prevalence of seed-borne pests and diseases in seed from informal sector, notably late blight, bacterial wilt, nematodes, and viruses.To The survey was conducted between June -August 2023. The methodology employed incorporated both primary and secondary data collection methods. The major steps undertaken included gathering and reviewing secondary data, conducting interviews, engaging stakeholder consultations, cleaning, processing, data analyzing the data, and report writing, a detailed method used in this study is found in Annex 1.To collect data on the seed potato industry in Rwanda, the following methodologies were employed:Secondary data was collected through a desk review of various documents from different sources, including but not limited to government entities, statistics institutes, international organizations, NGOs, publications, and online resources. The major sources of this documentation included the Ministry of Primary data was gathered through interviews, stakeholder consultations, and focus group discussions (FGDs); interviews targeted seed potato actors like producers, dealers, and ware potato stakeholders (Annex 2 and 3).Individual Interviews: Forty-eight (48) seed potato actors were sampled and interviewed using a questionnaire/survey tool containing different sections depending on the structure and information needed. The various sections in the study tool included: a questionnaire covering areas such as seed categories, production facilities, training, technologies, marketing, financial resources, challenges, and proposed solutions. The seed actors were categorized into 9 groups: Seed producers, Agrodealers, Potato breeders, Researchers, Farmers, Extension agents, Government agencies, Seed companies, Traders, and Processors (Table 3). Sample size calculation was performed following the formula of following the formula of Krejcie and Morgan (1970) with a 95% confidence level.Focus Group Discussions: Five (5) Focus Group Discussions (FGDs-) one in each target district) were conducted using a guiding tool; Annex 4 guide was prepared and used to complement the data collected from interviews. The FGDs gathered seed potato producers, farmers, extensionists, and marketers, with each supply chain actor represented based on its contribution to the supply chain. The FGD guide was designed to collect data related to seed potato performance, gaps, and a well-functioning model to improve the adoption and use of improved seeds. One FGD was organized in each project operating district (Annex 4).Stakeholder Engagement: Thirteen (13) stakeholder consultations were conducted according to roles within the seed potato supply chain using the Key Informant tool, Annex 4. A consultation guide tool outlined data to collect, and key informants shared insights on seed quality, supply trends, policies, institutions, challenges, and opportunities. The roles of key stakeholders consulted, and the information gathered during these consultations are detailed in Table 3.A SWOT analysis of the seed potato value chain involved a wide array of data from participants representing different facets of the seed potato industry in Rwanda. These participants included seed producers, agro-dealers, potato breeders, researchers, farmers, extension agents, government agencies, seed companies, traders, and processors. The SWOT analysis utilized a multi-pronged approach which involved data collection through surveys, interviews, and extensive research, aiming to gather insights from each participant category. The gathered data were subsequently analyzed to identify the internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats influencing the seed potato value chain in Rwanda.The quantitative data collected from individual interviews were analyzed using SPSS and Excel. The qualitative data collected through consultations with various actors across the seed potato supply chain were analyzed using the content analysis technique. All results from the above analyses were triangulated to understand the seed potato quantity needed for each growing season in Rwanda, the current situation of seed potato in Rwanda, and gaps and challenges in the seed potato supply chain. This analysis provided the basis to produce this report and to develop a 5-year seed plan for synchronizing seed potato production of different actors through sector coordination to match the supply and demand of seed potato. There are several seed potato value chain actors in Rwanda engaged in production of various seed classes starting with pathogen-free invitro plantlets/healthy mother plants form TC laboratories mainly by RAB and a few private sector (INES, UR, Agriseeds) through to certified seed Table 4. Each seed actor plays a critical role along the chain as it moves the seed to the next generation ending with ware potato farmers with RICA providing the mandatory inspection and certification services. There are three seed potato production systems in Rwanda:1) The formal or the legally recognized system that undergoes seed certification by RICA., Certified seed is produced either from minitubers or from healthy mother plants transplanted directly to the field condition often referred to as direct transfer. Public institutions under RAB and private companies are engaged in production of minitubers and mother plants. Registered seed multipliers buy the basic seed from Early generation seed (EGS) producers mainly from RAB and a few private sectors and carries out field multiplication to a certified seed potato class under RICA. Seed classification in the formal system is categorized into four seed generations, Table 5.2) The semiformal seed system is legally recognized and is responsible for producing Quality Declared Seed (QDS) by registered seed multipliers. This usually happens when a registered seed field is downgraded for failing to meet all the requirements for certified seed. Though QDS is not certified, it is seen to be healthier than farmsaved planting material or other sources from the informal market.3) The informal seed system involves farmers using seed from their own farms, from neighbors, from local markets, or from ware potato traders. Unfortunately, the informal seed system is mainly responsible for the low yields due to poor quality planting materials used by farmers. In Rwanda, the public sector dominates early-generation seed (EGS) potato production, while the private sector dominates certified seed potato production. Currently there are five (2 public and 3 private) tissue culture (TC) laboratories in the country used for the production of in vitro plantlets, and RAB is the main producer of in vitro plantlets, with a share of 70% of total plantlets production since 2019.The study showed a low operational capacity for privately owned TC laboratories. For example, the TC laboratories owned by INES-Ruhengeri and Agriseeds African Ltd are currently operating at 13% and 8% capacity, respectively, while the TC laboratory at the University of Rwanda (UR) located at the College of Agriculture, Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine (CAVM), Busogo Campus is not functional, Table 6. The plantlets produced in Musanze TC lab are mainly utilized for research, seed production at the station, and sales to the private sector. For example, out of the 1.2 million invitro plantlets, produced during the 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 production cycle, only ten percent were used for research, while the majority, 70% were used for seed production at the RAB research stations, and the remaining 20% sold for seed production to private seed producers for seed production (Table 7). These statistics underline the relatively low engagement of private seed multipliers in utilizing in vitro plantlets for minituber production.Thus, there is a need to involve the private sector in seed commercialization, from EGS production to certified seed distribution and marketing. This will free resources at public institutions for breeding research, germplasm varietal maintenance, quality control, knowledge-sharing technology transfer, and consumer protection. Concerted efforts are necessary to increase the capacity of private seed multipliers and encourage their involvement in minitubers production. There is a total of 67 facilities used for minituber production in Rwanda, owned by both the public (7) and private sectors (60). Different seed production systems are used in these screen houses: 5 have adopted sandponics technology, 6 have installed aeroponics systems and the remaining 56 uses conventional methods for minituber production, (Table 8). However, only 46 (69%) of these facilities are currently operational: five sandponics, five aeroponics facilities, and 36 conventional screen houses. The remaining 21 (31%) facilities are nonfunctional. During the face-to-face interviews, the owners of the 21 non-functional screenhouses attributed this to the high cost of inputs, low demand for an unstructured market for minitubers, and a lack of funds for rehabilitation.A gap analysis revealed low productivity along the seed potato value chain from EGS production through to certified seed. The average minituber productivity is 7 and 30 minituber/plantlet under conventional and aeroponics production systems respectively (Table 7). The annual production of minitubers in 2023 year is about 1,024,025 and 1,622,695 minitubers from private and public institutions, respectively (Table 8).This production is below the expected production of 50 minitubers/plantlet under good aeroponics management.Hence there is a need to optimize the production of EGS to close the EGS gap. It is worthwhile to mention that production in aeroponics is dependent on variety. For example, Kirundo produces between 35 and 45 minitubers per plant, while Gikungu produces 25 to 30 minitubers per plant.Similarly, the average production of pre-basic, basic, and certified seed potato as reported by a majority, 88% of 24 seed producers interviewed is 10 tons/ha, 12 tons/ha, and 15 tons/ha, respectively, way below the attainable yield of 20-30 t/ha recorded by some progressive smallholder farmers. The seed producers attributed the low productivity to inefficiency in the seed production systems coupled with inadequate knowledge and skills.Potato Plants for minituber production under the Aeroponic production system (left) and under the Conventional production system (right) at RAB -Musanze Station. Photo credit; Clement Urinzwenimana, 2023Much of the yield gap currently constraining productivity in the country is attributed to poor seed quality. Rwanda currently produces less than 5% of the required disease-free seed potato, creating a substantial seed availability gap of over 95%, Table 8. Thus a vast majority of potato farmers relies on seed sourced from informal systems, including farmers' on-farm saved seed, tubers from ware potato markets, or neighboring farmers (RAB 2023).It is pertinent to note that what is sold in the seed market as \"seed potato\" in most cases is either certified seed, quality declared seed (QDS), or positively selected seed (PS). The study revealed that of the total volume of seed potatoes produced between 2018 and 2023 as per the RAB and RICA annual reports, merely 7% comprises certified seed, while the larger proportion consists of QDS and PS, Table 9 and Figure 3. This indicates that a significant portion of the Early Generation Seed (EGS) is not utilized for certified seed purposes, but rather downgraded to QDS or farmers used it to produce PS seed.While Quality Declared Seed (QDS) holds legal recognition and significantly enhances seed accessibility for farmers, the overarching objective remains to augment the prevalence of certified seed within the country. Certified seed surpasses all quality standards, whereas QDS represents a lower tier of certified seed due to partial compliance with these requirements. Considering that superior seed quality substantially enhances yield potential, the adoption of certified seed is highly commendable. Both the public and private registered seed potato producers are engaged in various seed categories, from EGS to certified seed. The public sector dominates the production of EGS (in-vitro plantlets and minitubers) through to basic seed potato generation with RAB taking a leading role producing approximately 95% of invitro plantlets and minitubers and the remaining 5% produced by the private sector. In contrast, the private sector which comprise of the local seed companies, cooperatives, and individual seed potato multipliers is solely responsible, 100% for production of certified seed potato. Given that RAB has the national mandate to develop agriculture and animal resources through research, agricultural extension, and animal resources extension there is a need to encourage more private sector involvement in seed potato sector.Private sector led seed potato value chain is expected increase production of EGS and certified seed and provide support on commercialization, distribution, and marketing channels. The current arrangement of having RAB taking the lead in EGS production could limit availability and accessibility of certified seed to all farmers.Seed potato initiatives and intervention -Approximately 40% of the interviewed seed producers stated that they receive external support to enhance their seed potato businesses. Notably, the government has played a significant role in investing in the value chain, collaborating with development partners and international NGOs. Key contributors to this support include AGRA, USAID/Feed the Future, the Netherlands Embassy, CATALYST, and international research institution-International Potato Center (CIP), among others.The support ranged from financial support for establishment of seed production facilities such as screenhouses for minituber production, and storage structures, supply of laboratory consumables and farm inputs, and training/capacity strengthening. Supporting soil remedy practices through supply of lime and availing public land to farmers' cooperatives and private companies for seed production. All these supportive initiatives are directed towards enhancing the availability of high-quality seed potato in Rwanda.Awareness creation -More than 70% of seed potato companies, cooperatives, and associations utilize extension agents to enhance farmers' understanding of the importance of quality seeds. This is achieved by establishing learning farms and/or demonstration plots to showcase the benefits of quality seed potato in combination with good agricultural practices (GAPs).Communication channels -Among the seed potato multipliers interviewed, 68.7% indicated that they receive feedback from their customers, who are primarily ware potato farmers and agro-dealers. The feedback is communicated through diverse channels with phone call, SMS and WhatsApp groups being the topmost communication channel as illustrated in Figure 4. Additionally, farmers visit seed multipliers, engage in meetings, attend training sessions, and provide feedback through radio and TV channels. Production cost -Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) revealed that production costs in the seed potato sector are dynamic due to the price volatility of ware potatoes. According to certified seed multipliers interviewed, starter materials were identified as the most expensive production item, followed by certification costs, agrochemicals, and labor. The average production costs for various seed categories over the past five years are outlined in Table 10.Data from the latest cropping season (2022A) indicated that the benefits of seed potato production increase from Early Generation Seed (EGS) at 0.02 USD per plantlet and peak at certified seed at 0.12 USD per kilogram (Table 10). Farmers are the most important stakeholders in the sustainable development of the seed potato sector. However, 71.6% of ware potato interviewed farmers report to low farmer participation in the designing and implementation of breeding and variety development program. Consultation with key informants indicated that in most cases, the objectives of the breeding program are influenced by government policies or projects resulting in releases of supplydriven varieties that lack alignment with demand-driven varieties. This has drawback effects on the new variety adoption by end-users. A majority of the active seed potato multipliers (75%) procure initial planting materials, including minitubers, prebasic and basic seed from RAB. Nineteen percent (19 %) obtain starter material from fellow seed multipliers, while the remaining 6% procure their starter material from large seed companies such as SOPYRWA, INES, and EGSP-Imbuto.The Rwanda Agriculture Board and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB) is the only public institution that currently produces seed potato in the country. There are five RAB stations: Rwerere, Musanze, Gishwati, Tamira, Gakuta, and Nyamagabe, that are located in potato agro-ecological zone and are engaged in the production of both pre-basic and basic seed potato. (Table 11). The total land available for seed potato production in the five RAB stations is 85 ha/ season, but on an annual basis (i.e., for both seasons A and B) though over 100 ha of land is dedicated to seed potato production in the five RAB stations. For example, in 2023, a total of 38 ha was dedicated for pre-basic seed and 50 ha was used for basic seed production for both season A and B (Table 11). Consultation with RAB seed officials indicated that on average produce 380 tons of pre-basic seed potato and 600 tons of basic seed potato per season are produced in the five RAB stations.The RAB stations have leased some land to private seed companies to encourage private sector involvement in seed According to RAB annual reports for 2018-2020 and RICA annual reports for 2021-2020, 37 ha, 182 ha, and 551 ha was dedicated to pre-basic seed potato, basic seed potato, and certified seed potato production, respectively (Table 12). Out of the 31 potato varieties officially released in Rwanda by RICA, only nine varieties are widely adopted and often preferred by both the ware farmers and the consumers. This includes three varieties -Kinigi, Cruza, and Kirundo, released in 1983-1989, and Gikungu, released in 1992 -1996. The adoption of potato varieties newly released in 2019-2020 is on the increase, with five varieties, namely Kerekezo, Ndamira, Nkunganire, Kazeneza, and Twihaze,showing an increasing trend in their preference.According to RAB, the demand for in vitro plantlets for these varieties from RAB, Musanze station by other RAB stations, and private seed multipliers is increasing (Figure 5). The study noted that some of the varieties released in 2020 that were developed by HZPC Holland B.V breeding company and have not yet multiplied in Rwanda. These varieties were mainly released in Rwanda to increase the number of potato varieties with processing quality.During the focus group discussion, seed potato value chain actors listed reasons for low adoption of the recently released varieties. About 80% of the potato farmers ranked low farmer participation during varietal development and performance evaluation as the topmost reason for low adoption rate. Although field trials are conducted in farmers' fields, the farmers and marketers are not engaged from the initial stage of breeding activities. Other reasons are lack of seed systems for some varieties, (e.g. varieties developed by HZPC Holland B.V) and insufficient extension services.The respondents also reported that the market price of ware potatoes from specific varieties positively affects farmers' adoption. Over 80% of ware potato farmers plant varieties with high market prices. For example, Kinigi, Gikungu, Kirundo, Kerekezo and Kazeneza varieties are preferred by many farmers because of their high-quality tubers (21%) and marketability (21%).Cruza variety was reported to be preferred by farmers due to storability (17%), disease resistance (17%), early maturity (13%), multiple shoots (8%), and acidic soil tolerance (4%). Other varieties adopted by farmers include Rwangume, Peko, Rutuku, Rwasaki and Kurusenke farmer selected varieties that are not officially released. RAB should collaborate closely with these farmers to ensure that these farmer-selected varieties are registered, and their seed systems are established. The consultation with RAB showed that the current development of export and processing of potatoes in Rwanda leads to a high demand for varieties with specific attributes such as storability, and high dry matter content.Interviewed ware potato farmers reported that Some of the approaches, used to create awareness on new varieties include demonstration plots, training, farmer field schools, field days, media (radio and TV).The certification process involves field inspection of the seed potato field at various growth stages and at the storage facilities, sampling and testing of soil and tubers, harvesting, sorting and grading into various seed classes, packaging and labeling, distribution, and marketing. According to RICA reports for the fiscal years 2021-2023, the annual average area of seed potato production that was inspected was 231 ha, (Table 13). Out of this, the average area accepted was 181ha, while 50 ha of seed potato was rejected. Notably, the average rejection rate across these fiscal years was 22 %.Despite having received training and in field technical backstopping from RICA seed inspectors 13% of the seed potato multipliers reported having experienced rejection of their seed potato field. Out of these, only 20% attributed the rejections to bacterial and viral disease infections, but the majority, 60%, did not know the reasons for rejections.Notably, 92% of seed potato multipliers respondents are implementing measures to prevent future rejection of their seed potato production fields. Some of the prevention measures listed by the seed multipliers include:i. Engaging an agronomist responsible for quality control,ii. Practicing seed production GAP and pest and disease control.iii. Conducting pre-planting soil testing/analyses, iv. Stringent crop rotation practices, When asked about sustainability of seed supply, the seed multipliers proposed the following interventions in the seed potato sectors:i. Increase the number of potato breeders to develop climate-resilient potato varieties.ii. Increase the number of seed inspectors to ensure timely inspection and certification process.iii. Support the rehabilitation of non-operational screenhouses and/or introduction new RMT Timely access to essential agro-inputs through private sector involvement.iv. Expansion of training programs to strengthen the skills and knowledge of seed potato multipliers in GAP, seed regulations, marketing and business skills.v. Maximize productivity of the EGS facilities through public-private partnership.vi. Introduce subsidy and crop insurance programs to private seed potato actors.vii. Facilitate access to financial credit.viii. Strengthening the capabilities of district chambers of seeds; and ix. Demarcate land dedicated for seed potato production. Seed-potato storage is important in ensuring timely access to quality and well-sprouted seed potatoes, thereby producing stable potato for national food security. Seed storage is essential for maintaining the quality of seed tubers between harvest and the next cropping season. With proper ventilation and appropriate storage conditions, seed tubers can be used for the targeted period with minimized weight reduction and keeping quality. The storability of potato (both ware and seed) is a complex process of avoiding rotting, preventing infestation, and maintaining quality.Seed potato can be cold stored either in an ambient cooling storage facility, in a cold storage facility, or in rustic storage structures such as Diffused light store (DLS) developed by the International Potato Center (CIP). DLS technology is a low-cost storage structure effective in reducing storage losses and results in better quality seeds and the growth of short, robust sprouts instead of long, thin, and weak ones.In Rwanda, all the seed producers have ambient or DLS facilities. However, no small-scale seed multipliers currently has a cold storage facility. Major seed potato companies including Seed Potato Fund Joint Ventures Ltd (SPF-IKIGEGA), EGSP-Imbuto (Early Generation Seed Potato), and \"Project de Développement de la Région du Nord (DERN)\" have seed potato stores in the main potato-producing districts of Gicumbi, Burera, Rulindo, Musanze, Nyabihu, Rubavu, Ngororero, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamagabe, and Nyaruguru (Table 14). The individual seed potato multipliers also own seed storage structures, which they use to facilitate seed distribution and sales to other seed potato multipliers and to ware potato farmers in Rwanda.To promote public-private partnership (PPP), MINAGRI transferred its seed storage facility in Musanze, Nyabihu, and Rubavu districts to SPF-Ikigega. There are 55 seed potato stores, including one cold storage facility and 54 Diffused Light Stores (DLS) in the country with a cumulative storage capacity of 8,440 tons of seed potatoes. This extensive network of storage facilities plays a crucial role in the seed potato value chain, ensuring that high-quality seeds are available for agricultural purposes. Regarding the satisfaction levels on the services received from public breeders (RAB/, MINAGRI) and seed inspector (RICA)s, 73% and 94% of seed potato multipliers are satisfied with the services rendered by RAB breeders and RICA seed inspectors, respectively.A majority, (over 80%) of the seed multipliers have good knowledge of RICA's contribution to the quality assurance for seed potatoes, including the measures adopted to mitigate or reduce the occurrence of seed potato field rejections. According to the seed multipliers, technical advice and recommendations provided during seed potato inspections, timely and routine visits by seed inspectors, the traceability of planted seeds, the establishment of comprehensive rules and regulations governing seed potato production in the country, and the training initiatives are some of the most appreciated services offered by RICA.Approximately 47% of the seed multipliers who procure starter material from RAB cited the undersupply of their seed orders as the main challenges they faced, disrupting their plans. Another 46% of the seed multipliers highlighted delays in delivery of their seed orders, and in some cases, seed orders are supplied out of season (Figure 6). These findings underscore the need for seed companies to align their seed potato production schedules with the actual growing season.According to the study, over 60% of seed potato multipliers interviewed are not members of the National Seed Association of Rwanda (NSAR) or Potato Consortium. During Focus group discussions, seed potato multipliers cited several reasons, including a lack of awareness about these associations and platforms due to lack or poor sensitization. Among the seed potato multipliers who are members of NSAR or the Potato Consortium, 45% ranked the timely services offered by the forum as the most influencing factor that determines their willingness to join the forum, (Figure 7).Stakeholders recommend that NSAR and the national seed potato consortium should jointly mobilize funds to improve the services. This will encourage other seed potato producers to join the consortium. A vibrant seed potato value chain is characterized by good coordination with the supply of seed by each group of actors in the chain closely matching the requirements of the next group who uses it. The flow of information on planting dates, quality, quantities, and varietal preferences by ware potato producers is essential for its success.There are several seed potato value chain actors in Rwanda engaged in production of various seed classes starting with pathogen-free invitro plantlets/healthy mother plants from TC laboratories mainly by RAB and a private sector Qualitative data collected from participants representing different facets of the seed potato industry in Rwanda was used to do a SWOT analysis. The participants included seed producers, agro-dealers, potato breeders, researchers, farmers, extension agents, government agencies, seed companies, traders, and processors.The data were analyzed to identify the internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats influencing the seed potato value chain in Rwanda, Table 16. The SWOT analysis sheds light on the key factors that will influence the future trajectory of this essential agricultural sector.The surveyed ware farmers highlighted the considerable obstacle posed by the high cost of seed potato, making it challenge in optimizing their potato productivity. A substantial majority, comprising over 80% of the interviewed ware potato farmers, emphasized the cost linked to procuring high-quality seed potato. An in-depth analysis further reveals that the cost of certified seeds fluctuates between 700 to 800 Frw (equivalent to 0.55 to 0.68 USD).Consequently, a vast majority of smallholder ware potato farmers in the Country end up sourcing low-quality seed potatoes from the informal seed system even when there is adequate of quality seed potato since eth high cost renders them inaccessible to smallholder farmers. A noteworthy observation is that 60% of ware potato farmers engaged in the practice of recycling their farm-produced seed potatoes for subsequent growing season.Unfortunately, these farmers often do not consider the yield penalty of recycling tubers to be high enough compared to the benefits of using certified seed. Thus, for many smallholder farmers, yield and profit gain from using certified seed is masked by lack and limited knowledge of its benefits. In addition to the prevalent challenges such as the high cost and limited availability of seed potatoes, ware potato farmers identified various other obstacles. Notably, 21% of surveyed ware potato farmers reported a restricted choice of varieties, particularly emphasizing the need for climate-resilient varieties. The high cost of agro-inputs was identified by 13% of respondents, while 12% expressed concerns about delays in seed delivery. Additionally, 8% highlighted a shortage of storage facilities, and 4% pointed out the scarcity of suitable land as challenges affecting their potato farming business, Figure 8. When asked about potential solutions, ware potato farmers interviewed presented the following seed potato interventions: 27% advocated for an increase in the capacity of seed production, 23% emphasized the importance of strengthening the linkages among stakeholders in the potato value chain while 18% prioritized the need for the timely availability of both quality and quantity of seed potato. A similar respondent, 18%, called for the development of climate-resilient potato varieties and region-specific adapted varieties and 14% underscored the significance of capacity building initiatives for ware potato farmers as a key solution.Ware potato marketers interviewed identified key challenges they faced when marketing ware potatoes with 33% expressing concern about the fluctuation of ware potato prices, 27% highlighting the perishable nature of potato tubers, and 20% listed a lack of communication mechanisms among key actors in the potato value chain. Additional challenges reported include low potato production (13%) and a shortage of seed for farmers (7%) as reported by their suppliers, Figure 9.In response to these challenges, ware potato marketers ranked the following interventions -33% of the respondents mentioned the need for consistent supply of ware potatoes from the producers to meet consumers preference, an increase in the quantity and quality of seed (27%), ensuring the full maturity of potatoes before harvesting (20%), promoting inclusive participation in potato forums (13%), while 7% emphasized the need for synchronizing planting schedule with the onset of cropping season. In evaluating satisfaction levels regarding the quantity, quality, and timeliness of seed received by potato farmers, timeliness received the highest ranking, with 60% of respondents expressing satisfaction (Figure 10). However, this finding underscores the necessity for improvement in both the quantity and quality aspects of seed potato production and distribution to meet the desired standards. The initial five-year (2016-2020) national seed production roadmap focused on key priority crops including Irish potatoes (RAB, 2016 Seed Road Map). Formulated in 2015 by RAB/MINAGRI, its primary objective was to tackle the scarcity of high-quality seed potatoes. The ambitious plan aimed to augment production to meet at least 10% of the total seed demand, amounting to 15,574 metric tons, by end of 2017. This target was anticipated to escalate to 25%, equivalent to 125,000 metric tons, by the year 2020. The 25% target was seen as the ideal condition is presupposed that farmers would recycle their own farm-saved seeds for four seasons before acquiring new seeds in the fifth season.Despite some notable achievements during the initial implementation of this seed roadmap, the intended outcomes were not fully realized. Notably, the production and utilization of certified seeds remain suboptimal. Rwanda currently produces less than 5% of the required disease-free seed potato, creating a substantial seed availability gap of over 95%. Much of the yield gap currently constraining productivity in the country is attributed to poor seed quality. The low yields have largely been attributed to high prevalence of seed-borne pests and diseases, notably late blight, bacterial wilt, nematodes, and viruses.The 10% and 25% target for utilization of certified by potato farmers was derived based on the following assumptions:1) The main growing potato Agro-ecological zones are Buberuka highlands (Gicumbi, Burera, and Rulindo districts); Virunga Agro-ecological zone (Musanze, Nyabihu, and Rubavu districts); Congo Nile Watershed divine (Ngororero, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamagabe, and Nyaruguru districts).2) The total land under potato cultivation is approximately 84,000 ha, 37,204 ha, 37,809 ha, and 8,638 ha in season A, B, and C, respectively.3) The rate of 2.2 tons of seeds for certified and basic seed production per hectare.4) 42,000 minitubers in pre-basic seed production cover one hectare.5) One Screenhouses accommodates 6,000 in vitro plantlets; and6) The productivity is 15 tons/ha, 12 tons/ha, 10 tons/ha, and 7 minitubers/plant for certified seed, basic seed, pre-basic seed, and minitubers, respectively.7) This estimation was used to determine the needed infrastructures for seed potato production.The existing seed potato gap based on 10% and 25% utilization of certified by potato farmers.Similarly, a gap in the seed potato supply chain remains evident based on 25% of land under potato crop being planted using certified seed, (Table 17). This gap increases from one seed category to next category, reaching its maximum (97.3%) for certified seed. The observed gap in basic seed, pre-basic seed and minitubers current production is estimated at 91%, 75%, and 32%, respectively (Table 17). It is pertinent to highlight that there is currently no discernible deficit in the production of TC plantlets; in fact, there exists a surplus of approximately 32%.The assessment of the requirement and existing resources for the production of certified seed potatoes, covering either 10% or 25% of the total potato-growing land indicates shortfalls in various areas. Specifically, there is a deficit of 1,385 ha, 239 ha, and 43 ha of land, along with a shortage of 33 screen houses dedicated to certified seed, basic seed, pre-basic seed, and minituber production. Notably, there is no deficiency in vitro plantlets, as the available potato tissue culture laboratories exceed the current demand, as outlined in Table 17.However, a significant disparity is observed in the inadequacy of screenhouses for minituber production and the insufficient land dedicated for prebasic, basic, and certified seed production in comparison to the requirement to cover either 10% or 25%. Public facilities at present are incapable of bridging these gaps. Consequently, it is imperative to engage the private sector to address and fill these identified gaps effectively.The comparison of the need and available facilities to produce certified seed potatoes to cover 25% of the total land of potato for one season in main Rwandan potato-growing agro-ecological zones revealed a gap of 1,385 ha, 239 ha, and 43 ha of land and 34 screen houses for certified seed, basic seed, pre-basic seed, and minitubers production, respectively. No gap was noticed in vitro plantlets; the available potato tissue culture laboratories have a substantial capacity compared to the demand (Table 18). However, the screen houses for minitubers production and the land for prebasic, basic, and certified seed production are severely lacking compared to the demand. The current public facilities are insufficient to address these gaps. This extensive network of storage EGS and storage facilities plays a crucial role in the seed potato value chain, ensuring that high-quality seeds are available for agricultural purposes. Compared to the neighboring countries, Rwanda is leading in the adoption of these seed potato technologies.Similarly, the number of private seed potato multipliers in the country-40 registered comprising of organizations (17.5%), Cooperatives (15%) and individual farmers (67.5%) is a good indicator on the value proposition of seed potato business. Currently the country boasts a surplus production of in vitro plantlets, serving as the foundational material for seed production.However, the study revealed that of the total volume of seed potatoes produced between 2018 and 2023 as per the RAB and RICA annual reports, merely 7% comprises certified seed, while the larger proportion consists of QDS and PS. This indicates that a significant portion of the Early Generation Seed (EGS) is not utilized for certified seed purposes, but rather downgraded to QDS or farmers used it to produce PS seed.These findings have been instrumental in shaping the development of a strategic five-year plan for seed potato production (2024-2028). The primary objective of this plan is to synchronize the efforts of different actors within the seed value chain, fostering coordination to ensure that efficiency along the seed potato production chain to maximize productivity and effectively align with the supply and demand dynamics of the seed potato market. The study unveiled a multitude of factors and challenges that significantly impact the seed potato value chain including but not limited to: to -97%), highlighting significant gaps and loopholes through the chain. Eighty-eight percent of seed producers interviewed reported an average yield of 12 t.ha (average for prebasic, basic and certified seed) way below the attainable yield of 20-30 t/ha recorded by some progressive smallholder farmers and over 40 t.ha at research stations. Ideally seed producers should get higher yields.The lack of adequate knowledge and skills among seed multipliers hampers the adoption of best practices and innovative approaches in seed potato production. For example, over 60% of seed farmers who experienced rejection of seed field did not know the reasons for rejections making it difficult to correct the status. planning and decision-making processes for stakeholders. About half, 47% of the seed multipliers who procure starter material from RAB cited the undersupply of their seed orders as the main challenges they faced, disrupting their plans. Another 46% of the seed multipliers highlighted delays in delivery of their seed orders, and in some cases, seed orders are supplied out of season.Addressing these multifaceted challenges will necessitate coordinated efforts and targeted interventions across the seed potato value chain to foster sustainability, resilience, and competitiveness in the sector.Based on the findings of the seed potato needs assessment, a comprehensive set of recommendations has been developed to effectively address the challenges identified and foster the growth and sustainability of the seed potato industry in Rwanda. These recommendations include: Bolstering pest and disease management, adopting good seed agronomic practices and appropriate input management and promoting appropriate storage facilities among other enhance productivity measures. The focus should be from minituber production upwards as there is currently no gap in the production of invitro plantlets.5. Support Regulatory Framework and Quality Assurance: Establish standards for requirements for quality control for early generation seed (EGS) starting with pthe roduction of iin-vitroplantlets in the tissue culture (TC) laboratory, production of minitubers from screen houses (conventional and aeroponics technology) as well as specific technical regulations to support the enforcement of those standards. To achieve this, there is need to:• Finalize and operationalize the updated seed potato inspection and certification protocols and create extensive awareness of the protocols and benefits of certified seed.• Support regulators to fully enforce seed law and other regulations -providing budgetary and technical support, advocating for required changes in seed potato structure including engaging more seed inspectors.• Streamline the quality assurance services to ensure easy certification services delivery in line with international standards and protocols will significantly improve the competitiveness of seed potato industry.• In addition, a program to build/strengthen the capacity of seed quality assurance staff with reference to ISTA and OECD best practices is a critical intervention.• Mandatory training for all the registered seed multipliers should be rolled out.6. Awareness creation: Most ware potato farmers and marketers lack awareness of newly released varieties that offer high yield potential, disease and pest resistance, climate resilience, and good processing qualities. This low adoption of new varieties leads to missed opportunities for farmers to benefit from genetic gains, resulting in low productivity and farm income from potato cultivation. Despite the potential for seed potato dealers and sector agronomist to bridge this gap by disseminating information to farmers, the study revealed that they lack up-to-date information and technologies accompanying new varieties. To address this issue, it is crucial to provide budget support to RAB and relevant department to assist seed producers, agro-dealers, and sector agronomists in:• Designing promotion messages and delivery models to increase awareness of emerging potato technologies and innovations.• Implementing best practices for setting up and conducting variety demonstrations and field days/open days to showcase the benefits of new crop varieties.• Utilizing local FM and television channels, as well as social media platforms, to deliver messages to a wider audience and enhance outreach efforts.• By employing these strategies, stakeholders can facilitate the adoption of new crop varieties, leading to improved productivity and income for potato farmers.The assessment revealed that local seed potato companies/producers face challenges such as weak institutional and technical capacity, a shortage of skilled personnel, absence of short-and long-term business plans, reliance on government support, inadequate infrastructure for producing quality commercial seeds. Failure to comply with quality assurance standards, and a lack of mechanisms for exchanging information with clients. To address these issues, it is essential to enhance the capacity of these companies/producers by supporting them to:• Develop business and marketing strategies to foster sustainability and growth.• Establish feedback mechanisms to improve communication and address client needs.• Ensure compliance with quality assurance standards to enhance product reliability and trust.• Facilitate exposure to advanced seed companies' managerial systems through exchange visits to improve operational efficiency and effectiveness in the seed business• These will enhance their competitiveness, improve their sales, and contribute to the overall development of the seed industry.The absence of promotion strategies, coupled with high rejection rates of declared seed fields and storage-related damages, highlights a deficiency in knowledge and entrepreneurial skills within the seed potato business ecosystem, including producers, agrodealers, distributors, processors, extensionists, and stockists. The lack of a graduation mechanism and a unified training program further hinders the development of adequate seed potato skills. Consequently, this situation impedes the adoption of seed-related technologies such as GAPs, post-harvest handling, dormancy management, storage, and distribution. To address these challenges and foster a resilient seed system, it is imperative to enhance the capacity of all actors within the seed value chain. This requires the implementation of a harmonized capacity-building program with a graduation mechanism, aimed at improving both technical and operational expertise and skills among seed value chain actors. 9. Digitize seed potato sector: The lack of structured, formalized, and centralized seed potato data and information management systems poses challenges for seed potato actors, as data is scattered across relevant Ministry Departments and private companies/multipliers. This fragmentation hinders collective data management, including collection, analysis, and sharing, which in turn affects awareness of availability, accessibility, and priority investment areas. To address this, support is needed to design and implement a digital system for coordinated data collection, analysis, and sharing. This system will provide accurate insights into the status of seed potato and facilitate informed decision-making for current and future interventions in the seed potato sector.The assessment revealed that most of the seed-related platforms suffer from internal dysfunction due to a lack of operational capacity, low membership coupled with low satisfaction levels by current members, and limited advocacy power; hence these weaknesses result to low participation in seed coordination and planning activities. Adequate support is required to enhance the operational capacity of platforms to play a considerable role in national planning, providing seed related information, and advocating for the members and seed sector. Strengthened platforms will be the key players in creating resilient private-led seed potato industry.The overarching objective remains to augment the prevalence of certified seed within the country. Certified seed surpasses all quality standards, whereas QDS represents a lower tier of certified seed due to partial compliance with these requirements. Considering that superior seed quality substantially enhances yield potential, the adoption of certified seed is highly commendable.12. Actionable five-year seed potato roadmap: Based on the findings of the seed potato need assessment, an We are carrying out a Seed Potato Needs Assessment Study. As an esteemed seed potato stakeholder, your company / business has been selected to participate in this study. Your participation is voluntary. The information we obtain from you will be treated confidentially. We won't record your name; your business' name and your responses will be completely anonymous. We will take precautions to ensure that the information you provide to us is not shared with anyone outside the research team. All information will be stored in password-protected devices.The findings of this study will help us to develop a model for sustainable seed potato supply chain at country-level, synchronizing all steps in the multiplication process considering targets in land availability, seed production tonnage, and quality assurance.You can choose to answer or not answer any questions and you are free to withdraw from further participation in this interview at any time. In case you decline/withdraw, your lack of participation will not have any negative consequence on the activities that are being undertaken by CIP and our partners to improve the potato sector.We would, however, really appreciate your participation and completion of the interview, and your honest answers to the issues we shall discuss. You can ask questions before and during the interview, and if after the interview you have any further questions or complaint about this study, you can directly contact Clement URINZWENIMANA by email (uriclement@gmail.com). When the results of this research are ready, we will send you an invitation to participate in a validation meeting where the findings will be presented, and feedback provided to all participants.The final need assessment report will be shared widely, and it will be freely accessible.The interview will take about 30 minutes to complete. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0064727759.json b/main/part_2/0064727759.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49f333da4ee245b0a442ff6788b800812f76560d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0064727759.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"af26795e112aa06dc61de14c8f188855","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a19a94a3-1055-44c1-ac5f-5f1e42841fcc/retrieve","id":"1033260970"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a8f9afcf-9d66-431d-9149-357f9fdcee16","content":"The rearing of the calf starts right after the most suitable sire has been selected and the cow has been fertilized. The correct feeding of the in-calf cow is the right start in rearing the calf.The gestation period of a cow is about 280 days, depending on the breed.Two months before the expected calving date, the cow should be dried off. During the \"dry\" period, the foetus increases its weight considerably (Friesian breed): The last 2 to 4 weeks before the expected calving date, the cow should be given a \"steaming\" treatment (the practice of commencing to feed extra rations, especially of grain and concentrates, to late pregnant cows in an attempt to promote maximum milk production from the very beginning of the lactation. Feeding usually commences about 4 weeks before the due date).As calving time comes near, the ligaments around the tail head and pelvis relax and sink. The vulva swells and mucus discharge is common. The udder becomes rapidly bigger (fuller) and udder oedema (swelling) may develop. Shortly before birth the uterus begins contracting, mildly at first. This may go on for as long as 24 hrs (average about 4 hrs), during which time the cow becomes increasingly restless.The foetus is pushed against the cervix causing it to open. Also during this time the foetus assumes its birth position, lying on its stomach with the forelegs extended and the head resting on them. Powerful contractions of the uterus begin and these are supported by voluntary contractions of the stomach muscles. The result is that the foetus is pushed through the birth channel within a few hours, under normal conditions. As the calf's head passes down the vulva, it curves downwards. This helps the rest of the calf pass through the pelvis more easily. In its normal birth position the calf assumes its smallest diameter. This is necessary to make the birth possible without too many difficulties. As a rule the calf will be born within an hour after the front begins to show in the vulva.If the calf has not been born after an hour or two, an examination should be made. If the calf is in its normal birth position some assistance may be given by pulling a rope that has been attached carefully to the forelegs.Always pull downwards in the direction of the udder rather than straight out of the cow. Pull only when the cow strains and do it in a careful way. Before giving assistance, clean water with a disinfectant (e.g. detol) should be used to wash the vulva and surroundings area. The person given assistance should clean his hands and arms thoroughly. Also the pulling rope should be disinfected.Abnormal positions of the calf occur sometimes. Veterinary assistance may be needed then. Some abnormal positions include:• only one front feet protrudes• the forelegs appear but without the head• the hind legs appear first• the tail appears first.In these cases the calf must be repositioned most of the times before it can be delivered.Other abnormalities that can occur during parturition include:• uterus contractions are not strong enough• foetus is too big; in this case surgery (caesarean) may be necessary to deliver the calf.In normal delivery the foetal membranes usually rupture about the time the forelegs pass through the vulva.Normally the calf is delivered free of the foetal membranes, which are still tightly attached to the placenta to assure a good oxygen supply to the calf during birth. The umbilicalThe in-calf cow ILRI Pakistan Factsheet 5 July 2015cord (navel cord) usually breaks when the calf passes through the vulva. At this time the calf must start breathing since it can no longer obtain oxygen from the mother.After birth, oxygen is the first requirement for survival. Make certain that the nostrils are free of membranes and fluids. Breathing can be stimulated by blowing air into the nose or by tickling the nasal cavity with a straw. This can make the animal sneeze thus cleaning the nostrils. After birth the calf must receive colostrum as soon as possible (at least within two hours after birth)After the calf is born, uterine contractions continue which free the foetal membranes from the uterus and expel them. This is the afterbirth. It should be disposed of as soon as it is expelled. If the afterbirth is not expelled within 12 hours after parturition, it is considered retained.When the placenta is retained and the cow is sluggish, has a poor appetite and appears to be sick, veterinary attention is needed. When the cow is eating and behaving normally, most of the times a bolus (antibiotics) is placed in the cervix. Normally the afterbirth will come off a few days later. It is bad practice to remove the afterbirth with force.The afterbirth is never removed completely in this case and serious damage to the uterus may be done resulting in sterility of the cow.Some fluid, containing blood and bits of tissue are usually found in the uterus after calving. This fluid is normally expelled during the first days after calving.This does not necessarily mean there is an infection. However uterine infections do occur regularly after calving.A good indication of the beginning of an infection is the odour of the discharge. The bloody discharge that occurs the first days after calving should not have a strong, foul smell. If there is a foul smell and pus, prompt attention is needed. Treatment is possible by placing an antibiotic (bolus) in the cervix.One day before calving, the cow should be brought into a disinfected, hygienic calving box (remember that a large paddock is much better than an infected, dirty calving box!)• sometime before birth the udder starts swelling (1-2 weeks)• about 12 hours before birth, the body temperature of the cow will go down a little "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0066878897.json b/main/part_2/0066878897.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e7141bbce2b378c9a8f3c0d34a2855a37f3b611e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0066878897.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6ff7e659095fcb65908e1b9095ad6e29","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1f0ea991-21d5-4225-b083-3ae995b957b9/retrieve","id":"1433205263"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0259cd30-bbb4-4ef7-b4e6-d5ef4ab76556","content":"It is abundantly clear that the threat of water insecurity, and the dangers it holds for people, economies and ecosystems, is coming into increasingly sharp focus. Changing risks of extreme precipitation, destructive floods, drought and aridification are apparent across many parts of the world, and not just from global datasets and the scientific literature, or the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, but in bold-faced media headlines and urgent appeals for action and investment.It is encouraging that, in spite of the alarm bells ringing for water security, IWMI has made successful steps forward in ensuring it is able to better support responses in the communities and countries where the Institute works, and better contribute to the partnerships that are critical to transforming water systems.At the global level, at the United Nations Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) in Glasgow, Scotland, in November 2021, IWMI joined more than 30 partners at the first-ever Water and Climate Pavilion to communicate a clear and urgent message to climate negotiators, partners across sectors, investors, businesses and funders: Transforming water systems to build water security is central to climate action and must serve as the foundation for a climate-resilient future.With this message resonating in Glasgow and with stakeholders at national, regional and global levels -and in preparation for the United Nations Water Conference to be held in March 2023 -the challenges motivating the IWMI Board of Governors and staff are clear: How do we deliver water security for the most vulnerable people? How do we use action on water security to adapt to climate change, build food system resilience, and advance gender equality and inclusion? How do we come together across nations, sectors, partnerships -and, indeed, research domainsto build water security as the climate changes?As this report demonstrates, IWMI makes a unique contribution to meeting these challenges. As the world's only international organization dedicated to conducting research on water management, IWMI's work builds on a rich, almost 40-year legacy of research, innovation and learning. In 2021, we marked the end of the IWMI-led CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE), and showcased results that will guide water-sensitive, sustainable economic development for years to come, and help to create a more climate-resilient and environmentally secure future for communities around the world. IWMI's Strategy 2019-2023 has proved to be a vital guide to the Institute's organizational development in the challenging and rapidly evolving global context we face. In 2021, we launched a series of new partnerships and projects, while continuing to develop IWMI's contributions to the ongoing reform of CGIAR. This reform -known as One CGIAR -is deepening the integration of governance and management across the CGIAR system, while broadening CGIAR's mission to embrace science and innovation to advance the transformation of food, land, and water systems and support climate action. Amidst such change, we ended the year on a growth footing -financially stable with a growing bilateral portfolio and strongly positioned in the emerging new cross-CGIAR Research Initiatives.With the support of our Board of Governors, we took steps to ensure that IWMI's vision for a water-secure world became more firmly embedded within the mission of One CGIAR as its transformation evolves. In doing so, our goal is to promote synergies across CGIAR and coordination of CGIAR's water-related research and programming in the years ahead.Alongside our contributions to One CGIAR, we are putting in place stronger, more strategic partnerships that we hope will strengthen the global institutional architecture for water. We are exploring a strategic alliance with the Global Water Partnership to use our clear complementarities to create joint programs to advance SDG 6 and the vision we share of a water-secure world. We also put in place the foundations for a new partnership platform, the 'Alliance for a Water-Secure World', with the goal of catalyzing investments in major new programs and partnerships for water security.As we reflect on 2021, we are deeply thankful to our staff, partners, IWMI's host government in Sri Lanka and our host communities around the world for their shared commitment and solidarity in weathering and navigating yet another year of the Covid-19 pandemic. While vaccines played a vital role in keeping the virus at bay, it was our collective endurance, resilience and resolve that made possible the progress and results featured in this report.We recognize that IWMI's many achievements in 2021 reflect extraordinary effort across the Institute, and we are enormously grateful to all IWMI staff for the exceptional hard work and dedication that made this possible.We invite you to learn more about our work in this annual report, which profiles some of IWMI's most impactful projects and shines a spotlight on our global engagement. As you will see, our vision for -and our determination to achieve -a water-secure world remains resolute and unchanged. Dr. Aditi Mukherji, Principal Researcher, IWMI, was a Coordinating Lead Author of the Water Chapter of Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). She was also part of the core writing team of the AR6 Synthesis Report. In 2021, IWMI hosted a webinar to present the findings of the IPCC AR6 Working Group 1 Report, and to discuss the implications of the latest climate change findings on Asia and Africa, where IWMI has been developing and implementing water management solutions to improve climate resilience. IWMI contributions to the IPCC reports are crucial to translating climate science into effective, comprehensive policy. Working Group II's Water Chapter was released in early 2022.Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE) led regional (in Southern Africa and Central Asia) and national (in Pakistan and Egypt) Independent Dialogues, and participated in pre-Summit events centered around the links between water and food. These dialogues helped identify local challenges and solutions to ensure a sustainable water supply to local and regional food systems. The dialogues focused on ways to sustainably transform food systems, while promoting inclusion and equity within the water-energy-food (WEF) nexus, and protecting ecosystems. Insights from these Independent Dialogues fed into the UN-Water-led global dialogue titled Water: The game changer for food systems and helped shape the UNFSS agenda. Major trends shaping IWMI's strategic and operational context in 2021Water, Growth and InclusionSmallholder farmers produce at least one third of the global food supply. However, in developing countries, 80% of these farmers live in water-scarce regions, despite being the main source of food production.In 2021, the Covid-19 pandemic disrupted food distribution channels, led to layoffs, restricted physical access to food markets, slowed transport, and diminished the capacity of institutions that support social safety nets for food security. Inclusion strategies are now a growing focus of development solutions, and gender empowerment is becoming more urgent in development solutions worldwide.Despite the global mobility limits which resulted from the Covid-19 pandemic, the 2021 World Migration Report revealed a dramatic increase in internal displacement due to disasters, conflict and violence. Although remittances dropped slightly in 2020, the number of international migrants continued to increase the following year, especially in Europe and Asia. Migration continues to be a major factor in development and change.Almost half of the world's population still has no access to the internet. This digital divide predominantly impacts women, rural populations and vulnerable communities living in developing regions of the world, where fewer than one in five people are connected to a mobile or internet network.Knowledge gaps, including the lack of data on water services, and the fragmentation of water science data, are slowing the implementation of comprehensive policy solutions. Nevertheless, new initiatives to render data and the internet more accessible have reached unprecedented numbers.Photo: Muhammad Usman Ghani / IWMIWater, Food and EcosystemsConnecting producers to markets with farmer-led irrigation development:Harnessing the power of water and energy for foodThe benefits of solar-based irrigation have long been recognized in countries where there is low access to the power grid. Once assessments of groundwater conditions show that increased irrigation can be achieved in a sustainable manner, next steps involve getting the right technologies to the right clients. This is often complicated by weak supply chains, high costs and a poor understanding of local market needs. IWMI is working to better scale the use of solar-based irrigation and as a result help strengthen food security and climate change resilience.A recent IWMI study suggests that solar photovoltaic pumps offer an economically and environmentally sustainable alternative to fossil fuel pumps. Private sector companies are eager to capitalize on this potential by expanding the market for small-scale solar-based irrigation. For these companies, serving small-scale irrigators, who have traditionally been perceived as high risk, can be profitable if the right business models are applied. However, the use of solar-based irrigation remains limited. IWMI and partners are working on new approaches to expand farmers' access to solar-based irrigation that are appropriate in cost and scale.With the abundance of sunshine in Ghana, solar-based irrigation offers smallholder farmers a promising alternative -but only if they can afford the initial investment. IWMI and its private sector partners co-developed and evaluated three possible business models that could address how farmers in Ghana's Northern Region can cope with the high upfront costs of buying a pump.In the first model, farmers purchase solar-powered pumps to access water for irrigation and other needs such as livestock watering, home gardening and domestic uses. Farmers can also sell water to neighbors. To make the pumps more affordable for this model of outright purchase, Pumptech Limited, a distributor of solar pumps manufactured by the German company LORENTZ, offers a pay-as-you-own credit scheme. This allows farmers to use the equipment while making regular payments until the total cost of the pump is paid off. Payments may be monthly, quarterly or scheduled around harvest times when cash flow is highest.The second model is an alternative to individual ownership -a shared model where a group of farmers jointly own a solar-based irrigation system. Group members share the costs and risks as well as the benefits. For the model to work, the group must be cohesive, with clear rules on water-sharing mechanisms, maintenance responsibility, financial management and conflict resolution.Under a third model, the solar system is owned, operated and maintained by a supplier or other third party. With the help of low-cost loans, partial grants and other financial incentives, entrepreneurs own and operate solar systems that provide irrigation water services to farmers for a fee. Entrepreneurs then use the fees from water sales to repay the loan.Data-driven tools are helping solar irrigation companies target their products and services to the right people, in the right way.Making innovative water management and irrigation technologies available to farmers on a massive scale is crucial if we are to meet growing food demands and respond to climate change impacts. However, scaling efforts often fall short because they do not sufficiently consider the factors that determine whether a farmer will adopt these technologies. Solar irrigation companies can target their products and services by identifying and segmenting customer groups.IWMI has been working to customize solar suitability maps to enable companies to identify where their marketing efforts should be directed. These maps pinpoint areas where smallholder farmers can invest in solar irrigation without depleting water resources. IWMI has refined the mapping framework to produce an online interactive tool for all of Africa.IWMI has been working with solar manufacturing and distribution companies to demonstrate how the maps and tools can be customized and incorporated into companies' sales zoning and marketing strategies. One of these companies, PEG Africa, used the maps to identify areas with the highest potential for its pumps, based on water resource type and depth, and adapted its marketing strategy to focus on these areas. In Mali, IWMI has been initiating customized solar mapping with other companies.A new toolkit assists in systemic, adaptive scaling of farmer-led irrigationEfforts to scale solar irrigation can often fall short because they do not sufficiently consider the complex realities of 'softer elements' such as people, supply chains, markets, policies and power relations.In collaboration with the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Small-Scale Irrigation (ILSSI) and the Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) projects, IWMI developed a toolkit to operationalize agricultural innovation scaling processes as an integral part of a systemic and adaptive approach to innovation.The toolkit includes tools for enabling environment analysis, solar suitability mapping, engaging and matching to form the scaling partnership, market segmentation, client assessment, demand-supply linkages, multi-stakeholder dialogues, and private-sector-driven capacity development.Aimed at implementers and private sector entities, the toolkit guides users in designing and facilitating partnerships and investments in scaling solar-based irrigation. For example, the enabling environment analysis tool guides a series of structured steps that lead to a clear understanding of the sets of policies, informal institutions, support services and other conditions that are important for irrigation systems. Based on a list of suggested questions, the analysis produces a country-specific report containing the information necessary to make recommendations for policy, successful scaling programs, and alternative scenarios to scale water solutions.The tool was developed in tandem with the World Bank publication titled The Farmer-led Irrigation Development Guide: A What, Why and How-to for Intervention Design.Farmer-led irrigation development (FLID) -in which farmers take the lead in establishing, managing and improving irrigated agriculture -is widespread, but FLID growth is constrained and inclusion is limited. There is significant potential for interventions to catalyze FLID processes, and thereby transform food and water security and promote sustainable livelihoods. Solar irrigation could be a possible game-changer in FLID, and now with IWMI's new toolkit, implementors can be deployed in a faster and smarter way.Measuring environmental flows at global and regional scalesIt's all about balance and trade-offs. Natural ecosystems need water to survive and thrive, but people are dependent on ecosystems and water for agriculture, drinking and many other purposes. When water resources are limited, how do you make these resources available to communities while protecting biodiversity and the environment at the same time?IWMI is pioneering new approaches to determining environmental flows (e-flows). E-flows are the quantity, timing and quality of water flows required to sustain freshwater and estuarine ecosystems and the human livelihoods and well-being that depend on these ecosystems. E-flows seek to strike a balance between water resources development and the protection of freshwater-dependent ecosystems. They tell us how much water we can use and how much we need to leave in the ecosystems.Recognizing the importance of e-flows, the United Nations created Indicator 6.4.2 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to track how much freshwater is being withdrawn by all economic activities, compared to the total renewable freshwater resources available. Indicator 6.4.2 is a measure of water stress at national level. It takes into account e-flow requirements as a measure of how much water should be left in ecosystems.IWMI developed an online, publicly available, interactive tool called the 'Global Environmental Flow Information System (GEFIS)'. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) adopted GEFIS as the official global tool so that countries can insert the e-flow estimations into the water stress formula within the framework of the SDG.In 2021, IWMI and FAO published a guideline on how to make use of GEFIS for SDG reporting. IWMI has now drafted two more reports which will substantiallyassist FAO in their use of GEFIS for SDG reporting. One report provides guidance on the measurement of the Environmental Management Class, making e-flows locally reflective of environmental conditions, while the other report deals with the contribution of groundwater to e-flows.From global to regional GEFIS is a valuable tool at a global level, but needs to be paired with tools that take into consideration local nuances and accurately incorporate local ecological conditions, making the estimation of e-flows much more meaningful.As part of the Resilient Waters project, funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), IWMI is working with partners in the Limpopo River Basin of Southern Africa to provide the necessary data to secure e-flows. The project is helping to provide a framework that will enable communities and ecosystems become more resilient to changes in streamflow.The rural communities of the Limpopo River Basin are highly vulnerable to any adverse impacts caused by climate change and excessive upstream water use. The basin has a high diversity of endemic and unique aquatic biota and important ecosystem processes that help to support more than 14 million people who live in the basin and depend on its resources. The water resources of the basin are limited and overused.IWMI scientists and partners conducted a risk assessment for the basin using the PROBFLO method, a holistic e-flow assessment tool that incorporates regional-scale ecological risk assessment methods in a robust, tested approach to determine e-flows with high confidence.It helps scientists evaluate the social and ecological consequences of altered flows at multiple spatial scales.The IWMI team described the relationship between river flows and the river ecosystem, and quantified the flows necessary to keep the ecosystem in its present or better condition. The study found that the percentages of total water required to protect e-flows vary considerably, ranging from 49% in some of the smaller upstream tributaries to only 16% in the lower reaches of the river.The IWMI team also highlighted the risk to ecosystem services provided by the basin when flows are altered. If e-flows were implemented, the condition of the river would be significantly improved, even though the overall e-flow is substantially less than the total present-day flow. Timing is key as e-flows can contribute to flows during the dry season when, at present, the river stops flowing in many places due to upstream abstractions. As a result, the risks to users of the ecosystem would be reduced in many parts of the basin. Local vulnerable communities would benefit from e-flows and be more resilient to climate shocks.Researchers acknowledge that there are socioeconomic costs associated with the implementation of e-flows in the Limpopo River Basin. However, the multiple benefits, and the long-term costs of operating the system in an unsustainable state, will outweigh any immediate costs of protecting the ecosystem.Strengthening resilience in the face of future droughtsDroughts are a natural part of the water cycle and, across time, have always challenged human civilization. Since humans first started recording climate trends, drastic drops in precipitation levels and arid cycles, which on average last around 300 years, have forced populations to move or adapt. However, today, the rising frequency, severity and unpredictability of droughts are impacting food and nutrition security for one in three people around the world who are already subjected to water scarcity of some form and therefore even more widely impacted.The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, with high confidence, that the likelihood of drought is projected to increase in many regions over the 21st century, even with strong climate change mitigation interventions in place. This increase is expected to be even more severe if no action is taken to avert the climate crisis.It has now been proven that climate change will not only induce more intense drought events, but also make them harder to predict. For decades, scientists have been able to rely on the past as a guide to plan for the future, but that is no longer possible. Scientists are now armed with new technologies such as map-based monitoring and early warning systems to help decision makers take timely action to manage drought.IWMI's work on drought is based on three pillars of integrated drought risk management centered around interconnected, multidisciplinary and multi-institutional activities. These pillars are (1) developing drought monitoring and early warning systems; (2) conducting impact and vulnerability assessments; and (3) elevating the importance of drought mitigation, preparedness and response.Each pillar is fundamental in promoting proactive drought management measures. The pillars are dependent on one another and essential to strengthening drought resilience.Tackling drought in the world's most water-stressed regionThe Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is the driest in the world with only 2% of the planet's renewable water supplies. It is home to 12 of the world's most water-scarce countries. Soaring temperatures and evaporation rates, in addition to decreases in precipitation across the region, are creating extreme challenges to water and food security. At the heart of the MENAdrought project was the development of an interactive map by IWMI researchers that shows satellite data on rainfall, land surface temperature, soil moisture and vegetation health -all compiled into an enhanced Composite Drought Index (eCDI). The color-coded maps allow decision makers to quickly identify an emerging drought, even before its effects can be seen on the ground. National partners are involved in the entire process, making use of satellite data to direct early mitigation efforts to the areas in greatest need, and helping stave off some of the more severe impacts of drought. For example, partners in Morocco are able to review monthly drought maps which are produced within eight days of the new month. These maps are publicly available to universities and policymakers. In Jordan, the government also uses maps to track drought and make payments to the farmers affected, while in Lebanon, the Ministry of Energy and Water works with MENAdrought to forecast droughts and better plan its responses.Like the MENA region, Afghanistan also suffers from unpredictable water scarcity. In 2018, the worst drought in a decade prompted the Government of Afghanistan to launch its Early Warning, Early Finance and Early Action Project. The AF-DEWS tool has been online since 2020, providing weekly updates of rainfall and temperature forecasts for a four-week period. In addition to forecasts, drought indicators are also given for specific locations, so that steps can be taken to minimize risks.With the incidence of severe drought on the rise, governments must provide faster and better-targeted resilience-building and relief measures. By using satellite images and remote measures of ground vegetation to assess the extent of the drought, IWMI developed the South Asia Drought Monitoring System (SADMS), an index that integrates information on vegetation, soil moisture and temperature. In 2020, IWMI received the Geospatial World Excellence Award 2020 for its development of SADMS.SADMS provides a weekly map of drought conditions in South Asia. Numerous drought indices, including the Integrated Drought Severity Index, Standardized Precipitation Index and Soil Moisture Index, have been developed to provide advanced drought monitoring and assessment information. In tandem, these indices not only paint an accurate picture of any particular drought episode, but also provide invaluable content for decisionmaking and application.The satellite data underpinning SADMS is used to identify conditions of various stages of drought and levels of soil moisture. The system has three components: monitoring and forecasting; vulnerability and impact assessment; and mitigation and response planning through drought contingency plans.The vulnerability and impact assessment component of SADMS helps authorities to assess risks and vulnerability before droughts occur.IWMI and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) have shared these weekly drought maps with agricultural extension services and state authorities. These maps assist with the preparation of drought contingency plans which help farmers manage drought risks and access insurance payouts.IWMI's work in the MENA region, Afghanistan and South Asia paves the way to improved drought monitoring in other parts of the world struggling with water scarcity.Drought is now becoming an important part of national and regional development planning in many droughtaffected regions, and is being recognized as a chronic problem rather than a series of ad hoc emergencies. IWMI's work is vital because proactive drought management to help nations deal with the devastating impacts of drought and build resilience is less expensive than crisis-led responses, it helps prevent these debilitating damages and casualties from happening, and because accurate forecasting models at scale are essential for better planning and preparedness.Natural disasters such as floods and droughts are not selective in who they target. However, it is the marginalized and vulnerable people who suffer the most when natural disasters decimate their livelihoods. These disasters are now occurring with increasing frequency, so IWMI has been working to make Weather Index Insurance (WII) broadly available among affected farmers in Sri Lanka to ensure they are properly compensated in the event of losses.In theory, WII can increase the ability of vulnerable farmers to recover financially from climate shocks with the compensation they receive, enabling them to resume cultivation in the following season. Using mainly satellite images to help predict damage and assess losses, WII facilitates faster compensation payouts to farmers by avoiding time-consuming verification of the damage caused at field level. This can result in low transaction costs and allow WII to be more affordable for smallholder farmers. When bundled with agricultural inputs and crop/climate advisory services, such as weekly rainfall forecasts and advisory on crop management practices, WII can expand the potential reach of insurance coverage to remote areas previously considered uninsurable.However, in practice, WII programs struggle to attract the people most in need of protection, particularly marginalized women and men. Reaching remote and diverse communities with technically complex index insurance products is an enormous challenge.Social and cultural divisions, combined with illiteracy and the lack of information and awareness about WII and its benefits, mean that small and marginal farmers that need support the most are often the first to be left out of WII schemes. These challenges can be compounded if the resources and time required to explain the complicated technicalities of WII to farmers and assist them to meet the eligibility criteria are not available. If those who need WII the most are not enlisted, existing inequalities will be Photo: Samurdhi Ranasinghe / IWMI reinforced and opportunities to promote pro-poor and gender-sensitive development will be missed.There are other vulnerable and socially underprivileged groups in Sri Lanka that have not benefitted from WII.Traditional norms favor men's privileges, resulting in additional constraints to women's equitable access to land and capital. These challenges are in fact similar across much of the developing world.Sri Lankan farmers emphasized that before adopting WII packages, they need to be able to assess the costs and benefits based on understanding how key elements of the product work. This highlights the importance of investing in awareness raising through a combination of print, verbal and visual tools that make complex products understandable to stakeholders with low levels of literacy.IWMI researchers assessed the effectiveness of WII bundled with real-time climate and agronomic advisory services provided to farmers in Sri Lanka via mobile phones. The study concluded that partnering with local organizations can be a cost-effective way of gaining the social science skills and local networks needed to engage with target communities. Such partners can bring prior knowledge of community structures and political economies, and the requisite skill sets and trust of people to the process.In response to the need to address the challenges posed by complex social contexts to include the most vulnerable farmers, IWMI has developed a framework which provides a road map that allows different stakeholders involved in all stages of developing and implementing WII schemes to address issues of inclusion in a systematic way. This framework takes a process-oriented approach that ensures actions supporting inclusion and equity run through the entire process of WII design, implementation and post-implementation. It further recognizes that inclusion and equity considerations should dictate who is involved in WII design and implementation.IWMI held dialogues on actions to improve inclusion in WII with government representatives, insurers, practitioners, academics and civil society representatives mainly within the South Asia region. The dialogues and IWMI's fieldwork highlighted that meaningful actions to enhance social inclusion will have to overcome several structural and system barriers.Government policy and rules now need to be developed that can clarify the potential multiple policy objectives of WII and set standards (e.g., equity) to be met by future WII programs.IWMI remains committed to moving this agenda forward and has closely collaborated with other CGIAR Research Centers. A community of CGIAR scientists will provide advice to the CGIAR Research Initiatives that have WII components. This will help ensure the initiatives address the nuances in WII that will set examples of how more inclusion of the particularly vulnerable can be created in these programs.Photo: Nabin Baral / IWMIWater security without gender equality will not workFor decades, IWMI's research has shown that we will not be able to achieve key development goals unless water systems investments, innovations and interventions support gender equality and social inclusion (GESI), especially in rural areas. As the multiple challenges of food, land and water systems sustainability converge, combining innovation with gender equality is a must to ensure systems deliver key benefits over time.In a project supported by Water for Women and Australian Aid, IWMI has explored how gender relationships and power dynamics influence the sustainability and functionality of domestic water supply systems in Nepal.Despite having the responsibility for ensuring household water supply, women usually do not have substantial decision-making power in the design, operation and maintenance of water supply systems.Nepal has shifted to a decentralized framework of governance and has used a GESI approach to ensure 40% representation of women across federal, district and local governance levels. Nevertheless, IWMI's research in Nepal shows that beyond their representation, much remains to be done to achieve effective engagement of women in water and sanitation governance. Attitudes and mindsets have not changed, and elected male leaders perceive women's representation to be tokenistic. Women who have been elected as representatives are invited to attend meetings, but their voices are rarely heard.Research conducted by IWMI in the rural municipality of Gurans in Dailekh district highlighted the challenges to transformative change. It revealed that before women can have greater representation, there must be stronger coalitions and coordination of women leaders to enable a more collective presence, voice and agency.Photo: ICRAF Building up women's collective power over community water security will play a central role in ensuring future system sustainability and, ultimately, the resilience of rural communities affected by the climate emergency.More than 2.2 million South Sudanese have fled their homes in recent conflicts and live as refugees in Ethiopia, Sudan, Kenya and Uganda. Many carried seeds, including okra, with them as they escaped their home areas. Okra is a nutritious part of their diets and culturally important in maintaining a sense of food and identity. However, settlements and camps where the refugees find sanctuary are frequently in areas where the soils are poor and water for cultivation is limited.IWMI and World Agroforestry (ICRAF) are leading a resource recovery and reuse project to support households in the reuse of domestic wastewater on new home gardens in six refugee settlements and their surrounding host communities in Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda. In the Rhino Camp of northern Uganda, for example, refugee households can generate 14 liters per person per day of greywater, which is sufficient to keep a small okra patch thriving during the dry season.This project underscores how water reuse has the potential to address the intimately connected issues of gender, food and nutrition in complex refugee situations. With these communities consisting largely of refugee women and children from many cultural backgrounds, our work pays particular attention to ensuring a genderresponsive approach across the project life cycle. Lessons learned on the dynamics of gender integration in displaced and vulnerable communities have resulted in a gender integration approach that can be applied across diverse programs.IWMI implements the ReWater MENA project in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region to support safe water reuse practices that can improve food safety, health and livelihoods. As more farmers rely on water reuse for irrigation, there is an alarming inconsistency in the quality of treated drainage water. The gendered implications of these challenges remain poorly understood.Gender-based social norms in the MENA region exclude women from water governance, management and decision-making processes. In collaboration with Jordan's Royal Scientific Society, the project conducted focus group discussions in Iraq al-Amir, in the North Jordan Valley. These discussions assessed the attitudes, perceptions, beliefs and experiences of both women and men regarding treated wastewater reuse. During the dialogues, women expressed a clear need and interest to be more effectively engaged in wastewater access, use and decision-making.Building on these findings, in Jordan, ReWater MENA is working with partners to improve women's access to essential information, including procedures and protocols for wastewater reuse. The project is exploring new ways of employing women in the water reuse and sanitation sectors. This opens opportunities for women to be part of identifying and deciding on appropriate water reuse options, and ensuring full compliance with reuse rules in order to protect themselves, their households and the environment.ReWater MENA, with support from the CGIAR GENDER Platform, also conducted research in Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt, to analyze the gender-power dynamics at the tail end of irrigation networks. Focus group discussions and in-depth case studies demonstrated how an increase in women's work in irrigated agriculture enables persistence of patriarchal structures including control over access to resources. The case studies document how landless women use water reuse practices to irrigate fields through sharecropping arrangements. Yet, the women rarely make any profits, are excluded from water decision-making, and are exposed to multiple health risks.The case studies recommend more inclusive irrigation practices, which put the health, social and well-being of the poorest groups of farmers at the heart of new investments, innovations and interventions. This recommendation aligns with the current national initiative Haya Karima, which recognizes the need to put human well-being, dignity and the rights of Egyptian citizens above all other goals.IWMI places gender equality and the empowerment of women center stage in transforming lives and livelihoods. We see gender equality and long-term water security as intimately connected -one is not possible without the other. Working closely with local partners, the findings of our research will continue to push for actions that lead to truly gender transformative change.IWMI Annual Report 2021Hybrid water law for historical justice in South AfricaThough apartheid in South Africa officially ended in 1994, vestiges still remain. Despite some post-apartheid water laws, the distribution of water resources remains highly unequal. IWMI is working with partners to identify options that can help decolonize statutory water law through a hybrid approach, finally helping those 90% of small users to get their equitable water share.Injustices due to the existence of dual, race-based legal systems were painfully visible during apartheid. A tiny minority grabbed the best land and water resources.In 1994, the new democratic state made discrimination illegal, while South Africa's government proposed new water policies and laws to achieve racial and gender justice.The National Water Act (NWA) of 1998 strived for a progressive, distributive approach to water but its interpretation and implementation have actually created greater inequalities. Under the NWA, water uses that were lawful under earlier legal regimes could remain as 'Existing Lawful Uses' (ELUs), a clause that powerful white users administratively exploited by hoarding such entitlements. After 1998, anyone wanting new access to water needed to obtain a permit.The second-class collective ELUs in former homelands have not been elevated yet. Because the needs of smallscale users have not yet been recognized as ELUs, they still have to apply for a permit to legally gain access to water resources. For post-1998 users, the process of getting permits is often costly, lengthy and bureaucratic for smallscale users. These users are then criminalized without a permit. Micro-scale water users are exempted from the obligation to apply for a permit but are then marginalized because exempted uses have a weaker legal standing than permitted water uses.The most common point of contention in South Africa regards the monetary value of water entitlements. Highimpact users have used ELUs, gained through racist laws, to claim high monetary values when transferring entitlements to this public resource to other users (as water trade) or through surrendering to the government (for compensation).Photo: Graeme Williams / IWMINow there is a path to ensuring historical justice in South Africa. For countless generations, living customary water rights regimes have governed water rights for millions of small-scale and micro-scale users in Africa's informal rural economies.IWMI is working with South African partners to encourage the use of 'hybrid water law', which is a suite of legal tools that are fit-for-purpose in different contexts across the African continent. Hybrid water law aligns legal tools from statutory law with customary legal systems. It combines state-managed and customarily managed water regulation.This hybrid approach recognizes that permitting is a useful tool for regulation of high-impact users. However, for all other users, different legal tools are needed. The approach is administratively lean, recognizes customary law and protects the most vulnerable. Instead of being entangled in concerns of getting a permit or not, hybrid law focuses on determining the ultimate goals that communities and states want to achieve through the regulation of precious water resources, and how best these can be realized.IWMI is trialing an alternative hybrid approach to achieving historical justice in the Inkomati-Usuthu Water Management Area (IWMA) in the north-eastern part of South Africa. Like elsewhere in South Africa, powerful users deprive the most vulnerable of water even for basic livelihoods, with just 7% of all those registered using a vast 83% of all registered volumes.IWMI is collaborating with the Water Research Commission (WRC) and the water authorities concerned -the Department of Water and Sanitation at national level and the decentralized Inkomati-Usuthu Catchment Management Agency (IUCMA) -to develop an implementation plan for the Inkomati Catchment.The project team is piloting different tools for legal recognition, protection and prioritization of collectivelyheld water resources in former homelands vis-à-vis upstream and downstream users. The team is also exploring a reserve for core minimum volumes to meet constitutional rights to water and food, and administrative justice in permitting. As part of the effective curtailment of high-impact users, WRC, IWMI and IUCMA are also assessing realistic crop water requirements, so that water allocations are based on factual use instead of total land areas, whether cultivated or not.With these changes ongoing, finally one of apartheid's major injustices can be redressed enabling a fairer rights regime for smallholder farmers in South Africa. Climate change will exacerbate the scarcity of and competition for water. As rainfall declines and temperatures rise, the availability of water becomes uncertain. Because agriculture can be waterintensive, irrigation is often our best bet to offset these uncertainties, and feed the growing global population. However, to ensure the sustainable use of water resources for irrigation, researchers and practitioners must be very clever about how they develop novel irrigation systems of the future to meet the needs of farmers.IWMI is pioneering digital innovation tools that can leapfrog existing technologies and have the potential to be game changers. These tools will play a key role in the transition to irrigation systems that are productive and profitable while being resilient and well adapted to climate change. The tools capitalize on new technologies and big data to sustainably manage both the supply of and demand for water resources. Tools developed in publicprivate partnerships will give farmers, water planners and managers more efficient ways to manage water resources and build resilience to climate change.Farmers in Amhara, Ethiopia, have access to water via the Koga Irrigation Scheme, but that water has not been used efficiently. IWMI is providing smallholder farmers with tools that allow them to assess whether their crops should be irrigated or not.WaPOR is the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) portal to monitor Water Productivity through Open access of Remotely sensed derived data. WaPOR assists countries in monitoring water productivity, Photo: Sanjiv de Silva / IWMI identifying water productivity gaps, proposing solutions to reduce these gaps and contributing to a sustainable increase in agricultural production. IWMI scientists are working with partners to build their capacity in the use of WaPOR data. WaPOR uses satellite data to monitor agricultural water productivity at different scales. This database provides the information necessary to generate solutions to local challenges linked to water and land productivity as well as water demand management.At the farm level in Ethiopia, and with the support of partners and donors, IWMI scientists are drawing on WaPOR data to work with farmers, national researchers and private companies in the introduction of low-cost sensors to improve irrigation scheduling and use water more efficiently while improving productivity of the land.One such tool is the Wetting Front Detector (WFD), which is an ingenious plastic tube that tells the farmer when sufficient water has accumulated in the root zone by pushing up a flag. By installing these at different depths, farmers can monitor irrigation flow until the soil has been sufficiently wetted.Another tool, the Chameleon Soil Water Sensor, connects via wires to a soil moisture sensor installed at different depths. It translates a plant's uptake of water into a simple color. The colors blue, green and red correspond to very wet, moist and dry, respectively.IWMI worked with farmers and national researchers in Koga to assess the efficiency of WFDs and Chameleon Sensors in the field. The results were very promising. According to key farmers, they reduced their water consumption by 35%, which helped extend the irrigation cycle from the local storage reservoirs. The decrease in irrigation water did not mean a smaller harvest. In fact, wheat yield increased from 10% to 20% according to farmers' estimates.The farmers noted that improved water demand management resulted in a faster rotation among water users in the same group, and resulted in a decline in water-related conflicts. The water saved was used to extend the area under cultivation within the blocks, and to also reduce water deliveries from main scheme operations to night storages.IWMI research has indicated that there is untapped and sustainable groundwater potential in many regions of Africa. However, use of that water must be monitored to ensure that recharge is managed and the resource is sustainable.Solar irrigation pumps (SIPs) offer a sustainable solution to groundwater extraction. However, with near zero operational costs, it is easy for irrigators to overuse the scarce water resources. IWMI researchers are investigating the land that is most suitable for solar irrigation, and how SIPs will impact groundwater resources and the connected water, agricultural, energy and environmental systems.IWMI has developed the Solar Irrigation Information System, a prototype platform that uses near real-time data from Futurepump, a private sector provider of solar pumps equipped with data loggers which measure the amount of energy used. The data derived from individual pumps allow managers to aggregate data to identify different patterns of use in real time. This helps future design, needs and operations of pumps to support design teams. The data also provide information on rates of abstraction of shallow groundwater reserves, which ultimately allows us to identify when and how much water is being abstracted and if this is sustainable, or how it could be better managed in relation to rainfall recharge.Farmers can use the resulting data to better understand where they can sustainably use solar irrigation, and policymakers can use it to better manage groundwater resources.Around 40% of the world's food is produced using irrigation. Yet, many irrigation schemes seem to follow a Build-Neglect-Rehabilitate cycle, which overlooks maintenance and infrastructure needs.IWMI developed an irrigation asset tool called Systematic Asset Management Software (SAMS). SAMS is an open-source and user-friendly application which captures irrigation infrastructure investments in a database and tracks performance and predicts when maintenance is needed. This innovative process will enable stakeholders to audit investments and keep track of maintenance.IWMI started a new project in 2020 titled 'Targeting investments in medium-to large-scale irrigation schemes'. Under this project, IWMI is furthering the development of SAMS to use remote sensing to digitally manage irrigation infrastructure and assess irrigation performance. The project is developing integrated tools that enhance the manager's capacity to carry out a quick assessment and make an investment decision that will increase the performance of irrigation schemes.Irrigation is only one of the ways in which practitioners, researchers and decision makers can engage in sustainable water management practices. Nevertheless, in many places, its potential remains untapped. Innovations with a long-lasting impact WLE's legacy lies with the practical and science-driven innovations that countries and farming communities can adopt to address development challenges and transition to more productive, sustainable and resilient food systems. These examples are just a part of the significant legacy that WLE is leaving for CGIAR and the wider world of research for development.WLE developed affordable and inclusive index-based flood insurance for flood-prone farmers. The insurance uses flood modelling data to estimate flood depths and duration, and satellite data to help assess flood damage.The approach removes the need to verify claims via field visits, speeds up the payment of compensation from insurers and helps ensure that premiums remain affordable. Another innovation is a bundled insurance product that provides compensation along with improved seed varieties of drought-tolerant wheat or flood-resistant rice, agricultural inputs such as fertilizers, and information on appropriate agronomic practices.Solar irrigation pumps have received significant attention during the past decade. They are a more affordable, reliable and climate-smart alternative to conventional diesel pumps. Efforts to increase uptake are not sufficiently 'pro-poor' and instead favor well-connected farmers with the means to invest in these solar pumps.With the help of IWMI, WLE researchers developed and refined farmer-centric business models that incentivize efficient water use and enhance smallholder access to the benefits of solar-powered irrigation without exacerbating groundwater depletion.Farmers are struggling with depleted soils, water shortages and climate uncertainty. At the same time, urban areas are becoming vast sinks for organic waste. The way forward is to mimic natural cycles by adopting the model of a circular economy -processing organic food waste, wastewater and human excreta to extract energy, nutrients, organic matter and water for agricultural use. WLE identified opportunities for resource, recovery and reuse using numerous technical and institutional solutions. Recognizing that many of these solutions remain inaccessible to small-scale entrepreneurs and other stakeholders, WLE innovated a business model approach tailored to these groups that can drive circular economies.Top-down approaches to restore increasingly depleted soils and water resources have had limited success because of a mismatch between the landscapes and recommended solutions, a lack of monitoring and maintenance and, crucially, poor adoption by communities lacking training or institutional support. WLE-supported work to restore degraded landscapes focused on understanding and engaging communities to obtain their buy-in. By demonstrating the potential economic benefits to communities, and securing their agreement and material contribution, restoration activities have been successfully implemented. These activities include landscape restoration and water harvesting practices; contour bunds to conserve water and reduce soil erosion; rehabilitation of traditional water tanks; mechanized micro-water harvesting packages; and weirs to capture nutrients and improve agricultural productivity.Poor soil health is a major cause of decline in agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. While WLE has ended, it is clear that its impact will continue to resonate and help strengthen our collective response to the climate crisis and the needs of climatevulnerable communities across the Global South. This award recognizes researchers and aspiring researchers who are committed to transforming agri-food systems. Eight finalists were selected from over 80 entrants for their pioneering approaches and potential to create a better food future for all.Photo: World Food ForumUnited Nations Food Systems Summit 2021: Water Dialogue Ahead of the United Nations Food Systems Summit 2021, a global water dialogue explored the fundamental interconnections between food systems and water systems, and their relation to other areas that are essential to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. At the event titled 'Water: The Game Changer for Food systems', it was concluded with consensus that water has unmatched utility to support the necessary transformation of food systems. Participants, including six senior IWMI experts, agreed that water plays a critical role in future proofing food systems against climate shocks and pandemics. This will make food systems more inclusive and healthier, which will help to end hunger and malnutrition, and safeguard the health of our planet.Resillience (SoLAR) -Webinar WeekThe IWMI-led Solar Irrigation for Agricultural Resilience (SoLAR) project, funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), organized a series of six webinars during the period February 1-5, 2021. The SoLAR project aims to generate knowledge to sustainably manage water, energy and climate interlinkages through the promotion of solar irrigation pumps (SIPs). The goal of the project is to contribute to climate-resilient, gender-equitable and socially inclusive agrarian livelihoods in Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan by supporting government efforts to promote solar irrigation. The six-part SDC-IWMI webinar series explored some of the big questions around energy transition and SIPs in four South Asian countries. The webinars were open to the public and gathered speakers from all four countries as well as those from outside the region.The IWMI reported an increase on its total grant revenue in the financial year 2021 of more than 25% with a total revenue of USD 31.13 million and achieved a surplus of USD 0.48 million. IWMI received an unmodified audit opinion on its 2021 annual financial statements and 21 project audits were carried out during the financial year to comply with grant agreements.In December 2021, the System Council approved the first group of 19 CGIAR Initiatives to launch from January 2022 and the 2022-2024 Portfolio and Designated Financing Plan.The Institute continues to review its policies, procedures and processes to further strengthen internal controls. IWMI is currently working with other CGIAR centers on the One CGIAR transition. Once the new One CGIAR transition is completed, all CGIAR centers, including IWMI, will have a further improved internal control system. The Institute also ensures that it strictly follows the clauses in the grant agreements and in compliance with donor regulatory requirements. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in US Dollars '000)"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0096134614.json b/main/part_2/0096134614.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1f354691243f8f58fb2efe4cd76c8c0d6844d49 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0096134614.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8c6e4a0c4e788557e504258c04a9d247","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/19c517e2-39cf-459f-9e5d-fc4e0741407d/retrieve","id":"-1530277747"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"60989fe8-38a6-4be3-86cf-8bd6391d7fd3","content":"Bovine brucellosis is endemic in India and imposes major health and livelihood burdens. In Bihar, India there is no state-run brucellosis control programme. Therefore, it is important to design an effective producers' education programme to reduce transmission of the diseases in people and animals. However, their perspective of the disease is not well understood and therefore, a study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of smallholder dairy producers in the state.• Cross-sectional survey of 3 districts of Bihar, India in autumn 2015. In each district, 1 rural and 1 urban area selected, from each 38-44 households: in total, 292 households (HH). • All selected HH were interviewed using a structured questionnaireKnowledge about brucellosis is very scarce, almost negligible among smallholder dairy producers in Bihar. Therefore, a customised education programme may be designed and implemented among the dairy producers to make them aware about the disease. More participatory research will be required to understand the attributes that determine the prevailing knowledge, attitude and practices and factors that might motivate dairy producers to change.• Only 6% of the producers were aware about brucellosis • Less than 3% of the producers were aware about the symptoms of brucellosis. • Less than 2% of the producers reported that brucellosis could be transmitted to human. • 2% of the producers knew it could be transmitted from animal to animal. • 53% of the producers threw away an aborted foetus; 44% buried the aborted foetus. • 48% producers used to take bath after disposal of aborted materials, 40% washed hands with soap and 10% washed clothes. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0096173865.json b/main/part_2/0096173865.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34dedb8dc3197b7d689a71618c960d454f0cc2ad --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0096173865.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4697ee548b0266b59e86816591ed2bdc","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ab5eec50-e27d-492b-b391-219194030808/content","id":"-651181726"},"keywords":["Triticum aestivum L. Puccinia striiformis f. sp. Tritici","herencia de resistencia","genes menores"],"sieverID":"113751dd-3172-47ca-8c9b-fc36c7510aae","content":"La roya lineal amarilla del trigo (Triticum aestivum L.) causada por Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici es una enfermedad de creciente importancia en los Valles Altos de Mexico, pues lIega a causar perdidas en el rendimiento mayores a 60 % y deteriora la calidad del grano. Las variedades de trigo harinero 'Juchi F2000', 'Nahuatl F2000' y 'Tlaxcala F2000' fueron Iiberadas por el Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias en el aiio 2000 para siembras de temporal 0 secano, que mostraron diferentes grados de infeccion por esta enfermedad. Para determinar la genetica de la resistencia a roya amarilla de las tres variedades, estas se cruzaron con la variedad susceptible 'Avocet-YrA'. Los progenitores y 148 familias F3 por cruza se evaluaron durante el Verano 2002 en Toluca, Estado de Mexico, bajo una incidencia natural de roya amarilla. Con los resultados de las familias F3 se determino que la resistencia de planta adulta a roya amarilla en 'Juchi F2000' esta regalada por tres genes menores de efectos aditivos, y que en 'Nahuatl F2000' y 'Tlaxcala F2000' esta condicionada por tres 0 cuatro genes de la misma naturaleza. Un gen en comun en las tres variedades fue Yr18, que confiere resistencia parcial de planta adulta a roya amarilla. La progenie de 'Nahuatl F2000' manifesto mayor nivel de resistencia, 10 que indica fue contiene mas genes 0 genes diferentes y mas efectivos; por ello, a traves de una cruza triple entre las tres variedades podria aumentarse el nivel de resistencia a roya amarilla.the disease In order to determine the genetics of the resistance to yellow rust in these three varieties, they were crossed to the susceptible variety 'Avocet-YrA'. The parents and 148 F3 families per cross were evaluated at Toluca, Mexico during the Summer 2002 under a natural incidence of yellow rust. The results of the F3 families allowed to infer that the adult plant resistance in 'Juchi F2000' was conditioned by three minor genes of additive effects. In 'Nlihuatl F2000' and 'Tlaxcala F2000' three to four genes of the same nature were identitied. A common gene in the three varieties was Yr18, which confers partial adult plant resistance to yellow rust. 'Nlihuatl F2000' progeny showed higher levels of resistance, thus indicating that it has a higher number of resistance genes. The intercross of these three varieties may allow to increase the level of yellow rust resistance.Index words: Triticum aestivum .Puccinia striifomUs f. sp. tritici, inheritance resistance, minor genes.En los Valles Altos de Mexico, que comprenden regiones templadas de los Estados de Mexico, Tlaxcala, Hidalgo, Puebla, Durango y Morelos, se siembran mas de 150 mil hectareas de trigo (Triticum aestrivum L.) de temporal 0 secano durante el verano (SlAP, 2008). En estas areas temporaleras se presentan condiciones favorables de humedad (mayor de 70 %) y temperatura (15-20 0c) para la incidencia de roya amarilla (Puccinia striijormis f. sp. tritici) , enfermedad que cuando ataca de manera severa en variedades susceptibles llega a causar perdidas del rendimiento mayores de 60 %) y deteriora fuertemente la calidad del grano (Huerta y Singh, 2000).El mejoramiento genetico para lograr resistencia a esta enfermedad ha sido el metodo mas eficiente en su control (Singh et al., 2002). Biffen (1905), uno de los primeros investigadores que estudi6 la genetic a de la herencia de infecci6n al ataque de roya amarilla, report6 que dicha resistencia es monogenica y de canicter recesivo. Con el redescubrimiento de las leyes genetic as de la herencia y el descubrimiento de que la resistencia a royas es un canicter de herencia simple, se han realizado numerosos trabajos sobre la herencia de la resistencia a roya amarilla, principalmente para identificar genes mayores. La mayorfa de variedades resistentes a roy a amarilla han tenido como fuente de resistencia a genes de herencia simple, pero la perdida continua del efecto de estos genes 0 de sus combinaciones, ha obligado a buscar alternativas en el manejo de la resistencia no especffica a este hongo, debido a que este pat6geno tiene la capacidad de mutar y evolucionar hacia mayor virulencia, 10 que ocasiona que se rompa nipidamente la resistencia.Una alternativa para lograr mayor durabilidad de la resistencia a roya amarilla es mediante la formaci6n de genotipos de trigo que posean resistencia durable, basada en genes que confieren resistencia de desarrollo lento de la enfermedad (slow rusting); el efecto de un gen de resistencia de desarrollo lento en el progreso de la enfermedad fluctua de pequeno a moderado, pero la combinaci6n de dos 0 mas genes de efectos aditivos resulta en un alto nivel de resistencia (Singh y Rajaram, 1994). Las variedades de trigo presentan genes de planta adulta, cuyos efectos son menores pero de acci6n aditiva (Singh y Dubin, 1997;Singh et at., 2002). Segun Milus y Line (1986a y 1986b), las variedades de trigo invernal 'Gaines', 'Nugaines' y 'Luke' exhiben resistencia durable a Pucdnia striijormis f. sp. tritid mas efectiva en planta adulta y a temperaturas mayores a 25°C que a temperaturas menores a 15°C, que es 10 mas comun; estos autores concluyeron que en cada variedad la resistencia fue condicionada al menos por dos 6 tres genes menores de efectos aditivos.Los estudios de herencia realizados en los ultimos anos en variedades mexicanas de trigo indican que los niveles moderados de resistencia en 'Penjamo T62', 'Lerma Rojo S64', 'Nacozari M76' y 'Tesia F79' estan condicionados por la acci6n monogenica del gen de planta adulta Yr 18 que confiere resistencia parcial (Singh y Rajaram, 1994). Singh y Dubin (1997) y Singh et al. (2000) encontraron que las combinaciones de Yr 18 mas dos 0 tres genes de la misma naturaleza inducen niveles aceptables de resistencia, y que a mayor numero de genes de efecto aditivo la resistencia es mas estable en cualquier ambiente que presente roya amarilla. En variedades como 'Pav6n F76' y 'Huites F95' que no poseen el gen Yr18, tambien es posible reducir los niveles de infecci6n mediante otros genes que igualmente inducen este tipo de resistencia, como Yr29 y Yr3 (Singh et al., 2001(Singh et al., , 2003)).Se ha reportado que no existen efectos negativos en el rendimiento al acumular mayor numero de genes menores de acci6n aditiva, de forma que se pueden conjuntar resistencia a roya amarilla y a roya de la hoja con alto potencial de rendimiento (Huerta y Singh, 2000). En Mexico la primera variedad de trigo liberada para siembras de temporal con este tipo de resistencia fue 'Zacatecaz VT74 , , seguida de 'Romoga F96' cuya resistencia permanece efectiva aun cuando se manifiesten varias razas de roya amarilla. Otras variedades para siembras de temporal como 'Zacatecas VT74', 'Pav6n F76' y 'Mexico M82' han mantenido niveles aceptables de resistencia, pero no asf las variedades 'Temporalera', 'Galvez M86' y 'Batan F96' que actualmente son susceptibles. Las variedades de trigo para siembras de temporal 'luchi F2000', 'Nahuatl F2000', Y 'T1axca1a F2000' mantienen resistencia a las diferentes razas de roya amarilla que se encuentran en el pafs, pero se desconoce el numero de genes que determina esta resistencia. En estas tres variedades• se ha postulado la presencia del gen Yr 18 y otros genes menores de efectos aditivos, pero no se tiene la certeza si Yr 18 se encuentra presente y cuantos mas 10 acompanan (Villasenor et al., 2003).Para lograr resistencia durable a roy a amarilla en las futuras variedades es necesario conjuntar de cuatro a cinco genes de efectos menores de acci6n genica aditiva, 10 que se conoce como resistencia cercana a la inmunidad. La manera de conjuntar este numero de genes es a traves del mejoramiento genetico (Singh et al., 2000). El objetivo de esta investigaci6n fue determinar la herencia de la resistencia de planta adulta a roya amarilla de las tres variedades de trigo para temporal, 'luchi F2000', 'Nahuatl F2000' Y 'Tlaxcala F2000' .El trabajo se efectu6 durante los veranos del 2000 al 2002. Se hicieron tres cruzas entre el progenitor susceptible 'Avocet-YrA' (AOC-YrA) con cada una de las variedades resistentes 'luchi F2000', 'Nahuatl F2000' y 'Tlaxcala F2000', empleadas como progenitores masculinos. En el Cuadro 1 se muestran los genotipos y sus progenitores. Las cruzas se hicieron durante el Verano 2000 en el Batan Texcoco, Estado de Mexico. La generaci6n Fl de cada cruza se sembr6 en campo de forma mateada durante el ciclo Otono-Invierno 2000-2001 en Ciudad Obreg6n, Sonora. De cada cruza se cosecharon cinco plantas al azar, tres de las cuales dieron origen a la generaci6n F2 y las dos restantes se guardaron como reserva. Las progenies de cada planta F 1 fueron sembradas en forma mate ada en el Verano 2001 para cosechar en forma aleatoria 50 plantas F2 de cada una de las tres plantas que conformaron a cada cruza. Para la obtenci6n de las familias F3, las poblaciones F2 de cada cruza se inspeccionaron visualmente, y cuando no habia discrepancia en las progenies de las tres distintas plantas F I se cosecharon al azar 50 plantas individuales de cada una de las tres plantas por cruza, para la obtenci6n de 148 familias F3.Cuadro 1. Cruza e historia de selecci6n de las cuatro variedades de trigo utilizadas en el estudio durante el verano de 2002 en Toluca, Estado de Mexico.Variedad-YrA-30Y Fuente: Villasenor et al. (2003) y Huerta-Espino et al. (2002).Durante el desarrollo de las poblaciones todas las cruzas y generaciones se protegieron con la aplicaci6n del fungicida Tebuconazol (Folicur®) para controlar la enfermedad y evitar la perdida de plantas susceptibles. Las familias F3 de cada cruza se evaluaron en el Verano 2002 en un campo experimental en Toluca, Estado de Mexico. Los progenitores y cada una de las 148 familias F 3 de cada cruza se sembraron en surcos dobles de 1 m de largo separados a 80 cm; se emplearon dos repeticiones para minimizar escapes, pero en el amilisis de datos s610 se uso una repetici6n porque no hubo diferencias significativas entre repeticiones.El amilisis genetico se bas6 en la frecuencia de familias resistentes, susceptibles y segregantes en un tipo de herencia cualitativa 0 mendeliana. Para lograr alta incidencia de la enfermedad, el experimento se rode6 con un bordo de la variedad susceptible 'Morocco', la cual actu6 como fuente de inoculo; al final de cada parcela, en franjas alternas tambien se sembraron surcos de la misma variedad. La evaluaci6n y c1asificaci6n de las familias F3 por su respuesta a la roya amarilla se efectu6 bajo incidencia natural del hongo. Para registrar la respuesta a la roya amarilla en las familias se hicieron dos evaluaciones de la enfermedad, la primera cuando el progenitor F3 susceptible alcanz6 de 90 a 100 % de severidad en la hoja bandera, y la segunda 7 d. despues. En todas las familias de cada cruza se estim6 el porcentaje de severidad en la hoja bandera, de acuerdo con la escala modificada de Cobb (Peterson et al., 1948); para las familias heterocig6ticas, identificadas por su segregaci6n, se estim6 el promedio de infecci6n de cinco hojas, mediante la misma escala. Tambien se evalu6 la FI de cada cruza de la misma forma que las familias F3. Sin embargo, en la FI se tomaron tres lecturas para observar el desarrollo de la enfermedad (Cuadro 2). Una vez hecha la evaluaci6n, las familias F3 de cada cruza se c1asificaron en cuatro grupos. En el Grupo 1 se inc1uyeron familias homocig6ticas con respuesta similar al progenitor resistente; en el Grupo 2 se ubicaron a las familias homocig6ticas con respuesta similar al progenitor susceptible; en el Grupo 3 se incluyeron las familias heterocigoticas que segregaron plantas resistentes como el progenitor resistente, hasta un porcentaje de severidad de nivel intermedio pero sin plantas similares al progenitor susceptible; y en el Grupo 4 se clasificaron las familias heterocigoticas que segregaron plantas con resistencia semejante al progenitor resistente, plantas con resistencia del tipo intermedio y plantas tan susceptibles como el progenitor susceptible. Con las frecuencias observadas y esperadas en ambas evaluaciones, se realizaron pruebas de X 2 .Las condiciones de temperatura (10 a 25°C) y humedad (mayor a 70 %) fueron favorables para el desarrollo de la enfermedad, la cual alcanz6 altos niveles de infecci6n en la hoja bandera (100 % de infecci6n) en el progenitor susceptible, 10 que permiti6 la evaluacion y c1asificaci6n de la F I, de las familias F3 y de los progenitores. La F I de las cruzas entre variedades resistentes y el progenitor susceptible indic6 que la resistencia a roya amarilla fue parcialmente dominante, como se muestra en el Cuadro 2. Al analizar el comportamiento de las familias F3 respecto a los niveles de infeccion, y al c1asificarlas en resistentes, segregantes y susceptibles, no se observo una distribuci6n discreta de c1ases que pudiese indicar la presencia de genes de resistencia de efectos mayores 0 factores de resistencia de dominancia completa; 10 que se observo fue una variacion continua de las familias F3. En la Figura 1 se muestra la distribucion de familias F3 en cada cruza. Figura 1. Distribuci6n de familias F3 de las cruzas entre el progenitor susceptible 'Avocet-Yr'A con las variedades resistentes: a) 'Juchi F2000', b) 'Nahuatl F2000', y c) 'Tlaxcala F2000 'AOC-YrAI Tlaxcala F2000' 50MS 60MS 70MS(1) Reacci6n de la planta a la enfermedad: S = Susceptible; MR = Moderadamente resistente; MS = Moderadamente susceptible; R= Resistente, El criterio para determinar el numero de genes se baso en el numero de familias homocigoticas susceptibles, las cuales son mas faciles de identificar en campo. Bajo el supuesto de que la virulencia del patogeno es recesiva y que la resistencia en la planta es dominante (Roelfs y Groth, 1988), el numero de genes implicados en la resistencia se determino con base en las frecuencias observadas de las familias clasificadas en el Grupo 2. Entonces, si la resistencia estuviera controlada por dos genes la frecuencias esperadas de familias homocigoticas susceptibles seria de (6.25 %) 1/16; si fuera condicionada por tres genes, la proporcion seria de 1/64 (1.6 %), y si estuviera controlada por cuatro genes, la proporcion seria de 11256, equivalente a 0.4 % (Cuadro 3). Cuadro 3. Frecuencias esperadas (%) en los cuatro grupos de clasificacion de familias F3 en cruzas susceptibles por resistentes, cuando la resistencia esta condicionada por genes men ores de efectos aditivos.Nllin. Grupo Familias homocig6ticas resistentes; Grupo 2 = Familias homocig6ticas susceptibles; Grupo 3 = Familias heterocig6ticas con plantas resistentes y plantas intermedias; Grupo 4 = Familias heterocig6ticas con plantas resistentes, plantas intermedias y susceptibles.Con base en las frecuencias esperadas y observadas (Cuadro 4), mediante la prueba de X 2 se determino que tres es el numero minima de genes de efecto aditivo que control an la resistencia en las tres variedades. Como en la van \" Nahuatl F2000\" se incremento la frecuencia de familias de tipo intermedin 0 Grupo 3 con respecto a las familias del Grupo 4, probablemente en esta variedad el numero de genes sea mayor (Figura 1). Lo anterior se evidencia tambien en el mayor nivel de resisteneia en la Fl. Lo anterior se ha observado en genotipos euyo numero de genes de efecto aditivo es mayor, con niveles de resistencia en la F 1 que en algunos casos es similar al progenitor resistente (Singh et al., 2000).Singh et al (2000 y 2002 en trigo; ademas, se confirma que para alcanzar mayores niveles de resistencia es necesario acumular mayor numero de genes de efecto aditivo, como en 'Nahuatl F2000'. En las tres variedades se ha postulado la presencia (Huerta-Espino et al., 2002) del gen Yr18/Lr34 ligado 0 pleiotropico a la necrosis de la punta de la hoja (leaf tip necrosis =ltn) , gen que reduce los niveles de infeccion de la enfermedad pero cuya accion individual es insuficiente porque los niveles de desarrollo de la enfermedad son mayores a 70 %. En el presente estudio fue evidente la necrosis de la punta de la hoja, por 10 que se confirmo que Yr 18 es uno de los genes presentes en las variedades 'Juchi F2000', 'Nahuatl F2000' y 'Tlaxcala F2000'. Este gen se considera de naturaleza durable y con efecto sinergistico al interactuar con otros genes de efectos aditivos, pues puede mejorar el nivel de resistencia en forma individual; estos genes en un tiempo se denominaron complejo Yr18 (Singh y Rajaram, 1992, 1994;Singh y Dubin, 1997).Al analizar los progenitores (Cuadro 1) se puede deducir que en 'Juchi F2000' el gen Yr18 proviene de 'Romoga F96', variedad que fue evaluada durante 10 afios (1986 -1996) Y desde entonces mostro nivel aeeptable de resistencia a roya amarilla, aun cuando la freeuencia de poblaciones del patogeno ha cambiado a formas mas virulentas. Este progenitor, al igual que 'Zacatecas VT74' posee el gene Yr 18 por 10 que en la cruza 'Zacatecas VT74/Romoga F96' este gen se encontro en estado homocigotico al igual que en la variedad 'Tlaxcala F2000'. En 'Nahuatl F2000' 10 mas probable es que Yr18 provenga de la var. 'Opata', aunque otros progenitores implicados en la cruz a , como 'PAM' y 'HaRK', tambien poseen el gen (V illasefior et al., 2003).Cuadro 4. Distribucion y frecuencia relativa de familias F3 en cuatro grupos de las cruzas entre el progenitor susceptible CAvocet-Yr'A) y los progenitores resistentes CJuchi F2000', 'Nahuatl F2000' y 'Tlaxcala F2000') en Toluca, Estado de Mexico durante el Verano 2002.Num. de La presencia de mas de tres genes de resistencia a roya amarilla en las variedades liberadas durante el 2000 indica que es posible conjuntar alto potencial de rendimiento y buenos niveles de resistencia, con calidad de grano y otras caracteristicas agron6micas deseables. Ante una poblaci6n de roya amarilla que se mantiene en cambio constante, la mejor forma de asegurar la sustentabilidad del trigo de temporal es mediante el uso de variedades con resistencia durable y evitar el uso de variedades con resistencia especffica, para 10 cual es importante que en el mejoramiento genetico se enfatice en el uso de resistencia no especffica 0 resistencia de desarrollo lento de la roya, que ha probado ser de tipo durable. Es necesario entonces diversificar las fuentes de resistencia para recombinar diferentes genes y aSI alcanzar una resistencia mas estable en los diferentes ambientes.Los resultados de las cruzas en Fl y de las familias F3 indica que al menos la variedad 'Nahuatl F2000' posee mayor mimero de genes que las otras dos variedades; no obstante, es necesario analizar si las tres variedades poseen genes diferentes, 10 cual requiere cruzarlas entre sl y confirmar que las tres poseen el gen Yr 18, ademas de determinar cuantos genes son diferentes. En caso de que haya por 10 menos un gen de diferencia entre ellas, entonces se puede incrementar el nivel de resistencia al entrecruzar estas variedades, y mantener como base al gen Yr 18. El entrecruzamiento 0 la combinaci6n de estas tres variedades pueden conjuntar no solamente mayores niveles de resistencia, sino tambien mayor rendimiento y calidad, puesto que individualmente las tres variedades son de alto potencial de rendimiento y buena calidad (Villasenor et aI., 2003).Con base en los resultados de las familias F3, se concluye que la resistencia de planta adulta a roy a amarilla en la variedad 'Juchi F2000' esta determinada por tres genes de efectos aditivos. En las variedades 'Nahuatl F2000' y 'Tlaxcala F2000' se identificaron entre tres y cuatro genes. El gen Yr18 es uno de los genes de resistencia que poseen estas tres variedades de trigo harinero de temporal liberadas durante el 2000. Se considera que al menos 'Nahuatl F2000' posee mayor mimero de genes 0 cuando menos un gen diferente que Ie confiere mayor nivel de resistencia, 10 que permitiria alcanzar mayor resistencia durable a roy a amarilla en otras variedades que se cruzaran con ella.Al CONACYT (Proyectos 34715-B y 12163) por el financiamiento otorgado para la realizaci6n de la presente investigaci6n. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0097932474.json b/main/part_2/0097932474.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..debe241dd528265e078f25b03572409d7a081687 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0097932474.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6c318f7704048b97032087b46427235d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/448839f8-9e14-475e-8ee2-51b6c3ac1547/retrieve","id":"2010750580"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"49b05d4b-4897-495c-990d-dccae9fe4818","content":"también a los agricultores de San Dioniso, Nicaragua en cuyos terrenos se realizaron los experimentos, entrevistas y estudios de caso que constituyen el entorno participativo en el que se desarrollaron las diferentes actividades del proyecto CIAT -Laderas e'1 Latinoamérica Se reconoce, también la excelente colaboración de Las Alcaldias y Autoñdades Locales donde se ha validado, Yorito-Sulaco.Instrumentos Metodológicos para la Toma de Decisiones en el Manejo de los Recursos Naturales La Figura representa el coníunto de los instrumentos metodológicos de la serie. En el centro se encuentran ocho instrumentos que se pueden agrupar de la manera siguiente: en color verde, Método Participativo para Identificar y Clasificar Indicadores Indicadores Locales de Calidad del Suelo a Nivel de Microcuenca; Análisis de Tendencias de uso de tierra; Mapeo, Análisis y Monitoreo Participativos de los Recursos Naturales en una Microcuenca, son los instrumentos que permiten identificar, analizar y priorizar los componentes biofísicos, o sea, los recursos naturales a nivel de finca, microcuenca y subcuenca.De color azul, al instrumento para Metodología de Análisis de Grupos de Interés para el Manejo Colectivo de Recursos Naturales en Microcuencas y el que se refiere a Identificación de Niveles de Vida para la Construcción de Perfiles Locales de Pobreza Rural, son herramientas que permiten identificar relaciones entre distintos usuarios de los recursos naturales. La identificación de niveles de vida permite clasificar los componentes socioeconómicos a nivel de veredas, pueblos y comarcas.De color amarillo, Atlas de Yorito y Sulaco, Yoro (Honduras), es el instrumento que tipifica la integración, análisis y presentación por medio de mapas de los datos generados por los instrumentos representados por los colores verde y azul.De color naranja, Identificación y Evaluación de Oportunidades de Mercado para Pequeños Productores Rurales y Utilización de Modelos de Simulación para Evaluación Ex-ante, son los instrumentos que facilitan el diseño de escenarios alternativos para planificar la producción a nivel de finca y microcuenca.Englobando estos ocho instrumentos y de color mora, Desarrollo de Procesos Organizativos a Nivel Local para el Manejo Colectivo de los Recursos Naturales, es la herramienta que permite: (a) definir el uso colectivo de los otros instrumentos, y (b) divulgar los resultados que se obtienen de la aplicación de éstos. Es el instrumento útil para la organización de la comunidad en orden a mejorar la toma de decisiones sobre el manejo colectivo de los recursos naturales a nivel de cuenca..I/JodoPaa, Ao,..,.\"''-. yClaiIJe. tJGit 1 r •• Loel'll deCllllfllltltlelSuelo . . . . . JaaeUMua.A medida en que se intensifica la producción agrícola para satisfacer las necesidades de la creciente población mundial, aumenta la presión sobre los recursos naturales como el suelo, el aire y el agua. La degradación del recurso suelo está ocurriendo a un ritmo alarmante, con casi mil millones de hectáreas de suelos agrícolas afectados por degradación grave o moderada. Aunque esta degradación generalmente se presenta a largo plazo, también puede ocurrir rápidamente a raíz de tormentas y deslizamientos de tierra. Sin embargo, la recuperación del suelo degradado es siempre un proceso lento y costoso. Por consiguiente, los usuarios del suelo y aquellos encargados de formular políticas necesitan indicadores no sólo para hacer un seguimiento del recurso suelo sino también para usar como diagnóstico temprano de que el proceso de degradación está comenzando. De esta manera se pueden tomar decisiones oportunas que permitan revertir el proceso de degradación o evitar que continúe.El suelo es considerado un recurso vivo y dinámico cuya condición es vital tanto para la producción agrícola como para el funcionamiento del ecosistema. Debido a su papel regulador en los ciclos bio-geoquímicos de nutrientes, como modulador de la disponibilidad de agua y su calidad, así como su rol en el filtraje y descomposición de contaminantes, el suelo es un recurso natural clave para nuestra supervivencia en el futuro. Necesitamos manejar este recurso básicamente no renovable (al menos durante el tiempo que dura una generación) con mayor habilidad y previsión para evitar una degradación adicional y la pérdida del potencial de producción agrícola.La sociedad ya dispone de indicadores y niveles críticos para la calidad del aire y del agua pero se ha descuidado el suelo como recurso natural. Por lo tanto, la necesidad de indicadores de calidad del suelo (leS) ha sido reconocida por la comunidad científica y por aquellos encargados de formular las políticas.La calidad del suelo se ha definido de mucha maneras. Aquí usamos la definición de Doran y Parkin (1994), donde \"la calidad del suelo es su capacidad para ser funcional, dentro de los límites del ecosistema y del uso de la tierra, para mantener la productividad biológica, mantener la calidad ambiental y promover la sanidad vegetal, animal y humana\". La salud del suelo, a veces usada de modo intercambiable con la calidad del suelo, se define aquí como \"la capacidad continuó de funcionar como un biosistema vital, dentro de los límites del ecosistema y del uso de la tierra, para mantener la productividad biológica, promover la calidad de los entornos atmosféricos e hídricos y mantener la sanidad vegetal, animal y humana\" (Doran y Safley, 1997). Para diferenciar entre los dos conceptos, se sugiere usar el término \"calidad del suelo• cuando se especifica el uso del suelo (Pankurst et al. , 1997). Fundamentalmente el término \"salud del suelo• difiere de \"calidad de suelo en que (1) incluye una función de tiempo y (2) reconoce que el suelo es un biosistema vital.Debido a que el suelo mantiene un equilibrio único entre factores físicos, químicos y biológicos, los ICS deben estar compuestos también por combinaciones de estos factores, especialmente en aquellas situaciones en que pueden identificarse parámetros que integren los tres factores y sus funciones. Un ejemplo sería la tasa de infiltración de agua que depende de la estructura física del suelo (especialmente textura), la química de los suelos (relaciones entre las superficies del suelo, especialmente arcillas) y la porosidad del suelo (que puede ser afectada por la actividad de la biota del suelo). Los indicadores biológicos o bio-indicadores por naturaleza son integrativos ya que reflejan simultáneamente cambios en las características físicas, químicas y biológicas del suelo. Esta condición les permite captar leves cambios en la calidad del suelo y por lo tanto tienen un gran potencial para diagnósticos tempranos.Según Doran y Safley (1997) y Beare et al. (1997), para que los ICS puedan ser útiles para una gran gama de usuarios, incluyendo agricultores, agentes de extensión investigadores y formuladores de políticas, deben:1. Ser relativamente fáciles y prácticos para que los agricultores, los agentes de extensión, los especialistas y los científicos puedan usarlos en condiciones de campo. 2. Ser relativamente precisos y de fácil interpretación. 3. Ser relativamente económicos. 4. Ser los suficientemente sensibles para reflejar los efectos de las prácticas de manejo y del clima en los cambios a largo plazo pero no tan sensibles que los patrones meteorológicos a corto plazo los afecten. 5. Integrar las propiedades y los procesos físicos, químicos y biológicos del suelo y servir como insumos básicos para la estimación de propiedades o funciones del suelo que son más difíciles de medir en forma directa. 6. Presentar una buena correlación, con procesos del ecosistema, con la productividad vegetal y animal, y con la salud del suelo. 7. Ser idealmente componentes de las bases de datos que existen sobre suelos.La selección de un conjunto apropiado de ICS y el desarrollo de su uso en un sistema de seguimiento (Sistema de Seguimiento de la Calidad del Suelo o SSCS) requiere de las siguientes actividades (Beare et al. , 1997) :1. Identificar les apropiados.2. Desarrollar un sistema de seguimiento respecto a la calidad del suelo.3. Lograr la aceptación del SSCS por los usuarios. 4. Hacer un seguimiento de sistemas agrícolas y de su sostenibílidad.Esta \"guía' se centra principalmente en la primera fase de este proceso, es decir, en la identificación de indicadores de la calidad del suelo que sean apropiados para ser usados por agricultores, técnicos y educadores.Al momento de escoger los ICS más adecuados es importante identificar las principales limitaciones bio-fisicas del sistema agrícola bajo estudio. La lista de les potenciales que se deriva de este estudio puede incorporarse en un sistema de seguimiento de la calidad del suelo (SSeS), junto con las mediciones básicas o estándares, como densidad aparente, pH, profundidad del suelo y de enraizamiento, contenido de agua, temperatura del suelo, e y N total, conductividad eléctrica y N mineral (Dorany Parkin, 1994). La sección de los parámetros técnicos o científicos dependerá del tipo de suelo y los procesos relevantes bajo un tipo particular de uso y clima predominante.Si el objetivo final es desarrollar un sses que pueda ser usado por los mismos usuarios de la tierra, se debe procurar incorporar Indicadores Locales de Calidad de Suelo en el sistema de seguimiento. La mezcla de parámetros autóctonos y científicos variará según los objetivos del seguimiento, por ejemplo, si se trata de agricultores, agentes de extensión o formuladores de políticas. Es probable que los ICS de tipo integrador sean mas útiles para los usuarios de la tierra que una medición, por ejemplo, del N inorgánico del suelo debido a que muchos de los indicadores usados por los agricultores también son de tipo integrador, por ejemplo, color de suelo, estructura del suelo, rendimiento del cultivo, presencia de especies específicas de malezas. También se debe prestar atención a la inclusión de indicadores que pueden usarse para aumentar progresivamente la escala de aplicación de los resultados, desde el nivel de parcela, campo o finca hasta el nivel de cuenca, región, y nación. Algunos ejemplos de estos indicadores pueden ser los rendimientos de los cultivos y las tendencias de rendimiento, la cobertura de la tierra, la inlensidad de uso de la tierra y los balances de nutrientes (Pieri et al. , 1995).Los pasos para establecer un sses incluyen:1. Definir las pautas para establecer un sistema de seguimiento; identificar los socios colaboradores, los agricultores y los grupos comunitarios y llegar a un acuerdo sobre la lista de ICS apropiados para las condiciones pertinentes.Recopilar información sobre las propiedades del suelo, los valores críticos y los intervalos de los parámetros del indicador. 3. Elaborar descripciones sencillas de los métodos incluídos para cada indicador. 4. Dar pautas para interpretar los resultados de cada indicador. 5. Dar recomendaciones sobre prácticas de manejo que permitan detener o revertir la degradación del suelo.Indicadores de Calidad del Suelo para las Zonas de Laderas de Centro y Sur América Las laderas andinas y centroamericanas albergan una gran proporción de la pobreza rural y son fuente de agua para las poblaciones urbanas y las actividades agrícolaslindustriales. También contribuyen a la producción de alimentos a través de sistemas agrícolas de baja productividad y eficiencia limitada del uso de nutrientes. Uno de los principales objetivos del Proyecto Laderas consiste en enfoques En la experiencia de los investigadores que desarrollaron esta guía una de las limitaciones más grandes para lograr la plena participación de los productores en el desarrollo del conjunto de prácticas de manejo sostenible necesarias para una región, es la deficiente comunicación existente entre técnicos y agricultores. En particular, la falla de un lenguaje común y de instrumentos metodológicos que permitan recabar el conocimiento campesino acerca del recurso suelo e integrarlo al acervo de conocimiento técnico aportado por las ciencias del suelo. Esta guía presenta un esfuerzo en lograr una mayor participación de los productores en la resolución de problemas de manejo de recursos naturales.La presente guía de capacitación se compone de las Siguientes secciones. La primera parte presenta una concepción técnica del suelo, nuestro recurso natural más valioso, como un cuerpo natural continuo a través de un modelo simplificado de la formación de los suelos (MSFS). La segunda explica la metodología para identificar y priori zar indicadores locales de calidad del suelo (ILeS). En la tercera se realiza la integración de los conceptos de propiedades diagnósticas y los indicadores locales de calidad de suelo, etapa que se consolida a partir de una feria del suelo. Todo lo anterior permite hacer una clasificación técnico -local de suelos con base en propiedades diagnósticas modificables y permanentes a nivel de finca y microcuenca, así como evaluar el impacto del cambio de uso y manejo del suelo a diferentes escalas espaciales.La serie de nueve Guías sobre Instrumentos Metodológicos para la Toma de Decisiones en el Manejo de los Recursos Naturales está dirigida a dos tipos de usuarios específicos.El primero, está compuesto por profesionales y técnicos que trabajan en organismos e instituciones de los sectores público y privado, dedicados a la investigación, el desarrollo y la capacitación en el manejo de los recursos naturales renovables. Este nivel de usuarios puede aprovechar las guías para apoyar la planeación, ejecución, seguimiento y evaluación de sus iniciativas en esos tres campos de acción. Pero, sobre todo, se espera que este grupo, una vez capacitado en la aplicación de las metodologías, ejerza un papel multiplicador para cientos de profesionales, técnicos, voluntarios y productores en la promoción, análisis y adaptación de dichas metodologías al manejo de los recursos naturales en los ámbitos local, regional y nacional.El segundo grupo de usuarios está conformado por los habitantes de las cuencas y subcuencas de América Tropical, quienes en última instancia son herederos legítimos de las propuestas para el manejo de los recursos naturales generadas a través de la investigación y presentadas en las guías. Estos, a través de la capacitación, asesoría y apoyo de una variedad de organismos no gubernamentales y agencias del estado, podrán apropiarse de los métodos y estrategias que aquí se ofrecen para participar activamente en el manejo y conservación de los recursos naturales.Este material tiene una especiál dedicación para los docentes de las facultades y escuelas de ciencias agrarias, ambientales y de los recursos naturales que forman profesionales y técnicos, quienes en el futuro inmediato acompañarán a las comunidades agrícolas en la ardua tarea de mantener o recuperar los recursos naturales.II_Pall1 \"''0 __ ... ya ..... 1\"'\" , f.\"\"\"'. ClllldMldIII S -.. NIveI.~ -Profundización -Actitudes para la -Refuerzo toma de decisiones La serie de Guías de Capacitación sobre Instrumentos Metodológicos para la Toma de Decisiones está basada en un modelo didáctico fundamentado en el aprendizaje a través de la práctica. Este modelo propone a los usuarios inmediatos de estas guías'--capacitadores y multiplicadores-un esquema de capacitación en el cual los insumos de información resultantes de la investigación en campo sirven de materia prima para el desarrollo de habilidades, destrezas y actitudes requeridas por los usuarios finales para la toma de decisiones acertadas y relacionadas con el manejo de los recursos naturales.Los usuarios de estas guías observarán que sus componentes metodológicos se diferencian de otros materiales de divulgación de tecnologías. Cada una de las secciones en que se dividen las guías, contienen elementos de diseño que le facilitan al capacitador ejercer su labor de facilitador del aprendizaje.Las Guías están orientadas por un conjunto de objetivos que le sirven al instructor y al participante para dirigir los esfuerzos de aprendizaje. Este se lleva a cabo a través de ejercicios en el campo o en otros escenarios realistas, en los que se practican los procesos de análisis y toma de decisiones, usando para ello caminatas, simulaciones, dramatizaciones y aplicación de diferentes instrumentos de recolección y análisis de información.6 l , cpmponentes incluyen las sesiones de información de retomo, en las cuales los participantes en la capacitación, junto con los instructores, tienen la oportunidad de revisar las prácticas realizadas y profundizar en los aspectos que deben ser reforzados. La información de retorno constituye la parte final de cada una de las secciones de la guía y es el espacio preferencial para que el instructor y los participantes lleven a cabo la síntesis conceptual y metodológica de cada aspecto estudiado.En resumen, el modelo consta de tres elementos: (1) la información técnica y estratégica, que es producto de la investigación y constituye el contenido tecnológico necesario para la toma de decisiones; (2) la práctica, que toma la forma de ejercicios en el sitio de entrenamiento y de actividades de campo y que está dirigida al desarrollo de habilidades, destrezas y actitudes para la toma de decisiones; y (3) la información de retomo que es un tipo de evaluación formativa que asegura el aprendizaje y la aplicación adecuada de los principios subyacentes en la teoría que se ofrece.Las prácticas son el eje central del aprendizaje y simulan la realidad que viven quienes utilizan los instrumentos para la toma de decisiones presentados en cada guia. A través de los ejercicios los participantes en la capacitación experimentan el uso de los instrumentos, las dificultades que a nivel local surgen de su aplicación y las ventajas y oportunidades que representa su introducción en los distintos ambientes de toma de decisiones en el ámbito local o regional de cada país.Los ejercicios que se incluyen en las guías fueron extraídos de las experiencias locales de investigación de los autores en microcuencas de Honduras, Nicaragua y Colombia. Sin embargo, los instructores de otros países y regiones podrán extraer de sus propios proyectos de investigación y de sus experiencias en el campo excelentes ejemplos y casos con los cuales reconstruir las prácticas y adaptarlas al contexto de su localidad. Cada instructor tiene en sus manos guías que son instrumentos de trabajo flexibles que pueden adaptar a las necesidades de distintas audiencias en diferentes escenarios.Es importante que los usuarios (instructores, multiplicadores) de estas guias conozcan el papel funcional que brinda su estructura didáctica para que la utilicen en beneficio de los usuarios finales. Son ellos quienes, van a tomar las decisiones de introducir los instrumentos presentados, en los procesos de desarrollo a nívellocal.Por ello, se hace énfasis en el empleo de los flujogramas por los instructores a quienes les sirven para presentar las distintas secciones; las preguntas orientadoras, que les permiten establecer un diálogo y promover la motivación de la audiencia antes de profundizar en la teoría; los originales para las transparencias, los cuales pueden adaptarse a diferentes necesidades, introduciendo ajustes en su presentación; los anexos citados en el texto que ayudan a profundizar aspectos tratados brevemente dentro de cada sección; los ejercicios y las prácticas sugeridos, los cuales, como se dijo antes, pueden ser adaptados o reemplazados por prácticas sobre problemas relevantes a la audiencia local; las sesiones de información de retomo, en las cuales también es posible incluir datos locales, regionales o nacionales que hagan más relevante la concreción de los temas y los anexos didácticos (postest, evaluación del instructor, evaluación del evento, evaluación del material, etc.) que ayudan a complementar las actividades de capacitación, Finalmente, se quiere dejar una idea central con respecto al modelo de capacitación que siguen las guías: Si lo más importante en el aprendizaje es la práctica, la' capacitación debe disponer del tiempo necesario para que, quienes acuden a ella tengan la oportunidad de desarrollar las habilidades, destrezas y actitudes que reflejen los objetivos del aprendizaje, Sólo así es posible esperar que la capacitación tenga el impacto esperado en quienes toman decisiones sobre el manejo de los recursos naturales.MétodiíPiriJe¡p\"tIvó ¡ia\",-RleñíIfféM ~YlñriléiidOiii¡'I:liéiI'iiS díi\"ca1liJaiI d'!Il SUfiJci;. El esquema anterior muestra los diferentes componentes de la guía y las relaciones que existen entre ellas. A continuación se ofrece una breve explicación.En la primera sección se hace una presentación técnica del suelo como un cuerpo natural contínuo a través de un Modelo Simplificado de la Formación de los Suelos (MSFS).En la segunda sección se explica la metodología para obtener y prioriz:ar los conocimientos locales, en forma de indicadores locales de calidad de suelo (ILCS) para luego compatibilizarlos con el conocimiento técnico con el fin de facilitar la comunicación entre productores y técnicos. Se presentan ejemplos basados en los trabajos realizados en Honduras y Colombia, pero los principios generales son aplicables en otras regiones.En la tercera parte se presenta la metodología de integración teórico -práctica de los conceptos sobre propiedades diagnósticas técnicas e indicadores locales de calidad de suelo, mediante la realización de la Feria del Suelo. Este es un evento de carácter participativo en donde productores y técnicos interactuan con el fin de compatibilizar conceptos y desarrollar indicadores locales de la calidad de los suelos (ILeS). De donde se parte hacia una clasificación técnico -local de suelos con base en propiedades diagnósticas modificables y permanentes a nivel de finca y microcuenca. Esta estrategia permite enfocarse hacia un manejo sostenible de los suelos y su impacto en otros componentes del ecosistema como lo son la vegetación nativa y el agua.Los resultados de este proceso repercutirán positivamente en el conocimiento técnico al nutrirlo con la demanda y percepción local. Las experiencias exitosas de iniciativas hacia un manejo sostenible de recursos naturales en agro-ecosistemas aumentaran considerablemente al tener la sólida base proporcionada por la relevancia local. Por otro lado, también tendrán impactos positivos en el conocimiento local al proveer una vía para su amplia comprensión, valoración y uso, así como el empoderamiento generado al ser copartícipes del conocimiento técnicolocal.,El instructor que emplea una metodología partícipatíva en la capacitación, inicia la misma con un pequeño cuestionario que le permite a los participantes (a) enterarse de los temas centrales que se tratan en la guía y (b) explorar qué saben acerca de los mismos.Para administrar la autoevaluación:• Entregue a cada participante o a grupos pequeños de participantes las preguntas que aparecen a continuación • Conceda unos 20 minutos para contestar • Comparta con los participantes las respuestas formuladas en la información de retorno • Permita una breve discusión de cada pregunta, sin profundizar en ninguno de los temas Preguntas 1. ¿Qué es para usted el suelo?2. ¿Cuál cree usted que es la importanCia del suelo como un recurso natural? 5. ¿Cuáles son algunas de las propiedades no modificables de los suelo$?6. ¿Que métodos conoce para evaluar la calidad de un suelo?!\"'.,:~ .... ~,..,._KlIInw ya-_ _ Loc:aI8sdec.o/ldeddel_. _dell~Orientaciones para el Instructor Discuta con los participantes cada una de las respuestas, para esto puede pedir la opinión de tres participantes por cada pregunta, esto previo a la presentación de cada respuesta correcta por el instructor.Considere que las respuestas pueden ser muy abiertas, por lo tanto cada opinión es muy vallosa y debe ser enfocada a orientar sobre los temas a tratar. También al final realice una síntesis de todas las respuestas, teniendo como objetivo el de inducir a los participantes a lo que se pretende desarrollar con los objetivos y resultados de la preser.te gu í a.El suelo es el producto de la descomposición de las rocas en partículas muy finas combinadas con materiales orgánicos que constituyen un medio apto para el crecimiento de las plantas y favorable a la actividad biológica.El suelo constituye la base de la producción de fibra y alimentos para la humanidadLos suelos poseen propiedades que los distinguen de las rocas. Dichas propiedades se dividen en externas e internas. Las primeras se refieren a las características del entomo del paisaje donde el suelo se ha formado (por ejemplo, pendiente, clima, organismos, tiempo). Las segundas se refieren a las propiedades del perfil de suelo las que se dividen en físicas, químicas y biológicas. Algunas de las propiedades físicas de los suelos son: textura, estructura y color. Entre las propiedades químicas se encuentran el pH o condición de acidez lalcalinidad, y los contenidos de los elementos requeridos por las plantas. Entre las propiedades biológicas más importantes se encuentran el contenido de materia orgánica y la actividad de los organismos del suelo. La calidad de los suelos es un concepto rell:'tivo que involucra la evaluación tanto de las características externas como las internas. Por ejemplo, un suelo en un relieve de montaña a pesar de ser menos apto para la agricultura puede tener una mejor calidad para la silvicultura que un suelo en relieve plano.Materia orgánica, pH, contenido de nutrientes, presencia de organismos Pendiente, clima, textura.La evaluación de fa calidad de un suelo requiere de la medición de sus diferentes propiedades en función de la actividad agrícola a la que se desea someter.El participante, al finalizar el estudio de esta Guía, será capaz de integrar los indicadores locales de calidad de suelo con propiedades diagnósticas técnicas de los suelos.Los participantes o usuarios de esta guía estarán en capacidad de aplicar la metodología para la obtención, priorización, y clasificación de indicadores de calidad de suelo que son reconocidos por la comunidad y los técnicos a nivel local.,/ Diferenciar los factores y procesos que intervienen en la formación de un suelo utilizando un modelo simplificado.,/ Describir los factores y procesos de formación del suelo.,/ Elaborar una lista de indicadores locales de calidad del suelo de la zona en estudio para determinar la calidad de suelos.,/ Determinar propiedades físicas (textura, color, estructura, profundidad) y químicas (pH, contenido de nutrientes, materia orgánica) y biológicas (organismos) del suelo relacionadas a los indicadores locales de calidad del suelo priorizados por la comunidad.,/ Compatibilizar los indicadores locales de calidad del suelo y las propiedades diagnósticas técnicas de los suelos utilizando las destrezas adquiridas en las sesiones prácticas (feria del suelo).A través de la aplicación de la metodología descrita en esta guia se obtendrá una matriz de indicadores de calidad de suelo utilizados por miembros de la comunidad para el reconocimiento de los diferentes tipos de suelo dentro de una región dada. Cada indicador local se integra con propiedades diagnósticas técnicas debidamente clasificadas en propiedades penmanentes y propiedades modificables. El cuadro integrado de indicadores contiene los elementos básicos para el ordenamiento de los suelos a nivel de las comunidades en donde se aplica la metodología (nivel finca o microcuenca) .Este proceso penmitirá identificar indicadores locales como guías de prácticas de manejo del suelo que faciliten así la adopción y evaluación de nuevas opciones tecnológicas.Originales para TransparenciasEl participante será capaz de integrar los indicadores locales de calidad de suelo con las propiedades diagnósticas técnicas de los suelos.• Determinar las propiedades físicas (textura, color, estructura, profundidad),químicas (pH, contenido de nutrientes, materia orgánica) y biológicas (organismos) del suelo relacionadas con los indicadores locales de calidad del suelo, priorizados por la comunidad .• Compatibilizar los indicadores locales de calidad del suelo con las propiedades diagnósticas técnicas de los suelos.ILCS+4 Al finalizar el estudio de esta sección, los participantes estarán en capacidad de:.¡ Diferenciar entre los factores y los procesos de formación de suelos mediante el conocimiento del modelo simplificado (MSFS) ..¡ Describir los factores y procesos que afectan la formación de un suelo ..¡ Identificar propiedades físicas, químicas y biológicas de los suelos y diferenciar las propiedades permanentes y modificables de los mismos.Preguntas Orientadoras1. ¿Cómo se forma un suelo?2. ¿Qué es un factor de formación del suelo?3. ¿Qué es un proceso de formación del suelos?4. ¿Qué es una propiedad permanente y una modificable en el suelo?1.1 Importancia del Suelo como Recurso NaturalPor qué el suelo es un recurso natural valioso?• Constituye la base de los recursos naturales renovables (flora y fauna)• Proporciona alimentos para la población y constituye el recurso base para la subsistencia de los más pobres. • Es un filtro para los desechos de la actividad humana así como reservorío de agua para los cultívos. • El suelo no es un recurso natural renovable.El suelo es un producto de la naturaleza cuya valoración difiere según la apreciación personal de sus diferentes usuarios. De acuerdo con Brady (1974) la evaluación de los conceptos modernos del suelo involucra dos fuentes básicas del conocimiento sobre este recurso natural. En primer lugar, el conocimiento práctico acumulado por los agricultores a través de los años constituía la única información disponible antes del advenimiento de la ciencia moderna. Este conocimiento por parte de los agricultores no ha sido suficientemente valorado, aunque constituye una valiosa fuente alternativa de información sobre los suelos y su manejo. En segundo lugar, se encuentra el conocimiento adquirido a través de la aplicación del método científico mediante la edafología o estudio de las propiedades del suelo y su relación con la producción, y pedología o clasificación del suelo.En esta guía se promueve el conocimiento del suelo mediante ambas visiones: la técnica y las experiencias del agricultor. Para lograrlo se plantea un marco teórico utilizando un modelo simplificado de la formación de los suelos, que aplica conceptos modernos de la pedología y edafología, para que el productor y el técnico puedan compartir sus conocimientos con el fin de entender y analizar el orígen, la evolución y la distribución de los suelos.1.3 ¿Cómo se forma el Suelo?Se debe entender por factor de formación a cada elemento, parte o agente que propicia un resultado. En este caso se entienden como factores de formación de los suelos aquellos elementos que intervienen como agentes causales en su desarrollo y son el clima, el material parental, el relieve, los organismos vivos y el tiempo.Estos factores se expresan en mayor o menor medida dependiendo del tipo de suelo y de las características del entorno ambiental. Por ejemplo, en un clima árido y frío, y topografía quebrada, la evolución del suelo estará limitada por el relieve, la disponibilidad de humedad y las bajas temperaturas que condicionan un substrato menos propicio para el desarrollo de organismos, incluyendo plantas y animales. Otro ejemplo lo constituyen los suelos que se han formado en relieves planos donde la característica principal que condiciona la evolución del suelo está marcada por la tendencia a la acumulación de sedimentos provenientes de las partes altas como resultado de procesos erosivos.Se puede considerar como el factor más determinante de la formación y evolución de los suelos. Entre los componentes del clima, la temperatura y la precipitación tienen la mayor influencia al controlar las tasas de los procesos físicos, químicos y biológicos. En general, se considera que si el clima es muy variable y contrastante se convierte en el factor de mayor influencia y tiende a dominar la formación de un suelo. La influencia del clima también se expresa a través de otros factores, por ejemplo, sobre el control que tiene sobre el tipo de vegetación que se desarrolla en una rsgión determinada.El paisaje determina, hasta cierto punto el potencial de desarrollo de un suelo. La topografía del terreno tiene efectos directos, bien sea acelerando o retrasando los procesos de formación de un suelo. Por ejemplo, el desarrollo del perfil del suelo en zonas con relieve montañoso de relieve en colinas condiciona cierto grado de erosión, que puede llegar a detener el desarrollo de suelos profundos. Por otro lado, en tierras planas los excesos de agua y la falta de drenaje pueden condicionar transformaciones de los minerales arcillosos de la roca que afectan directamente el tipo de suelo que se forma.Este constituye el sustrato o roca madre del cual se forman las diferentes fracciones minerales que constituyen el suelo. El material parental está constituído por los 1-1 minerales originales y los productos de los procesos de intemperismo, tanto físicos como químicos, que difieren en su composición y resistencia a la degradación. El material parental tiene una profunda influencia en las características físicas y químicas del suelo. Por ejemplo, las texturas arenosas en muchos suelos están determinadas en gran medida por la composición del material parental. Asimismo, la presencia de carbonatos de calcio en el material parental en una región húmeda retrasa el desarrollo de la acidez, no obstante pueda ser este un proceso promovido por dicha condición climática. Finalmente, el material parental tiene una influencia marcada en el tipo de suelo que se desarrolla a partir de las arcillas presentes en un perfiLLas plantas constituyen un fador de formación de suelos debido a su contribución a la materia orgánica del suelo lo que diferencia a los suelos de la roca finamente dividida. En algunas regiones las plantas son determinantes de las características del suelo superficial así como de su evolución. Por ejemplo, en zonas de praderas los pastos por su sistema radical tienden a distribuir la materia orgánica en forma más homogénea dentro del perfil de suelo que en aquellas zonas donde predominan otros tipos de vegetación. Los organismos del suelo tambien ejercen una marcada influencia en la formación de los suelos debido a su rol en la descomposición de la materia orgánica, la redistribución y ciclaje de nutrientes y la transformación de estos nutrientes a formas necesarias para la nutrición vegetal.El período de tiempo durante el cual adúan los procesos de intemperismo sobre los minerales del material parental afeda directamente las características del suelo resultante. Por ejemplo, los suelos desarrollados en depósitos aluviales o lacustres en general no han tenido el tiempo suficiente para evolucionar como ha ocurrido en suelos desarrollados en otros paisajes. Asimismo, muchos de los suelos de las zonas húmedas del trópico han evolucionado bajo condiciones de intemperismo extremo de los materiales originales, lo que causa una condición de intenso lavado que se manifiesta como suelos de baja fertilidad.Son aquellos condicionantes que pueden hacer que un mismo grupo de fadores de formación evolucionen hacia diferentes tipos de suelos. Los procesos de formación se pueden clasificar en las categorías:La contribución de cada uno de ellos en la formación de un suelo dependerá de la medida en que los factores de formación interactúen entre sí. Por ejemplo, un suelo formado en un relieve muy escarpado típico del paisaje de montaña, en general estará dominado por los procesos de pérdidas de las capas superiores por acción de la gravedad. Consecuentemente, esta pérdida se convertirá en ganancia en las regiones bajas en las cuales se forman los depósitos aluviales típicos del paisaje de los valles.Los procesos de pérdida en la formación de los suelos ocurren principalmente por efecto de lavado y erosión. La erosión es, quizá, el proceso de pérdida más conocido. Puede ocurrir de maneras diferentes y por agentes y mecanismos muy variados; entre los que se encuentran el agua, el viento y la gravedad, que pueden provocar desde una pérdida casi imperceptible por erosión laminar hasta los movimientos en masa incluyendo deslizamientos masivos, solifluxión, replación, flujos de lodo y derrumbes.El lavado de los compuestos o elementos presentes en el perfil del suelo depende principalmente de la solubilidad de los mismos y su relación directa con el régimen de humedad. Otro ejemplo de los procesos de pérdidas es la acidificación de un suelo como consecuencia del desbalance de los elementos bases como calcio, magnesio, sodio y polasio.El suelo es un depositario por excelencia. Puede recibir todo tipo de residuos tanto benéficos, como aquellos que alteran su buen desarrollo. Estos residuos pueden ser líquidos, gaseosos o sólidos y en formas minerales o biológicas. Es importante, por tanto, que de ellos analicemos los aportes minerales y orgánicos.Este proceso se define como la modificación de los materiales inorgánicos (fracciones minerales) por medio de la meteorización química y del intemperismo; y las transformaciones que se efectúan en los materiales orgánicos (materia orgánica y humus).Las translocaciones son procesos que conllevan un movimiento físico de los constituyentes del suelo y que ocurren al interior del perfil del mismo. Un ejemplo ampliamente reconocido de este proceso es el movimiento de las arciffas de los horizontes superficiales con su consiguiente acumulación en fos horizontes inferiores, proceso que se conoce como iluviación.Las propiedades o indicadores de la calidad de los suelos que determinan la aptitud de uso y manejo del suelo, se dividen en físicas, químicas y biológicas. Estas Se usan para describir los atributos y características de un suelo en función del conocimiento de su forma (morfología).Las propiedades físicas de los suelos de acuerdo con su determinación y con los fenómenos relacionados con ellas pueden ser divididas en dos grandes grupos; -Físicas fundamentales: textura, estructura, color, consistencia, densidad y temperatura. -Derivadas: porosidad, capacidad de retención de aire, capacidad de retención de agua, compactación y profundidad efectiva.Esta característica de los suelos se determina por el porcentaje de cada uno de sus componentes minerales (arcilla, limo y arena). La textura es responsable entre otras condiciones de la fertilidad potencial, la aireación, la permeabilidad, la humedad, y la profundidad efectiva, grado de evolución, tipo genético, y características quimicas asociadas de los suelosEs la forma de agregación de las partículas. Es afectada por la descomposición de los materiales orgánicos, los óxidos e hidr6xidos de hierro y las mismas fracciones 1 I , j i arcillosas, de tal manera que se presentan diversas condiciones entre las cuales se identifica la forma, y el tamaño de 10$ agregados.Tiene una relación directa con la temperatura, la humedad, el clima, los organismos. Se utiliza comúnmente como indicador de la fertilidad de los suelos. El color cambia dependiendo del contenido de humedad y de la cantidad de materia orgánica.La consistencia se define como la resistencia que ofrece a la deformación una masa de suelo bajo condiciones especificas de humedad. Es un indicador de la calidad de los suelos muy relacionado con la textura, contenido de materia orgánica, naturaleza de la arcilla, y contenido de humedad. Además, tiene una incidencia notoria sobre el laboreo del suelo y la profundidad de enraizamiento.En los trópicos temperaturas muy altas y muy bajas, así como los cambios relativamente rápidos de temperatura durante el día constituyen factores de intemperismo que actuan durante la formación de los suelos especialmente en zonas montañosas.Se considera que el 50% del volumen del suelo se encuentra ocupado por la fracción porosa, la cual dependiendo del tamaño de los poros, está utilizada por aire, agua disponible y micro-organismos. Por lo tanto, la fracción porosa afecta la difusión de los gases, la penetración radicular, :a regulación de la temperatura y la actividad biológica en el suelo.Esta propiedad de los suelos está determinada por la cantidad de macroporos (0.05 mm), presentes en el espacio poroso y que facilitan el movimiento de los gases que intervienen en la actividad de los organismos vivos en el suelo.• Capacidad de retención de aguaEs el rango de humedad entre agua retenida por el suelo que está disponible para uso por las plantas (capacidad de campo) yagua retenida que no está disponible para ser usada por las plantas (punto de marchitez permanente). Esta propiedad es afectada directamente por el tipo de espacio poroso presente en el suelo.La compactación eS el resultado de la alteración del espacio poroso de los suelos, provocada por el uso inadecuado de prácticas agropecuarias en los sistemas de producción.Esta indicador se refiere a la profundidad que pueden alcanzar las raíces sin encontrar impedimentos físicos o químicos. Constituye una de las propiedades más importantes e indica el potencial del suelo para la producción de cultivos.Las propiedades químicas de los suelos permiten conocer los contenidos de los componentes orgánicos e inorgánicos en el suelo y su influencia en la producción y productividad de los cultivos. Entre las propiedades más importantes se encuentran:• pH Indica el grado de acidez o alcalinidad que presenta un suelo, y tiene una influencia directa en las características físicas, químicas y biológicas (actividad microbiana), Determina en gran parte, la disponibilidad de nutrientes en el suelo.• Contenido de materia orgánica Los compuestos orgánicos depositados sobre la superficie y en el interior de los suelos se descomponen de forma más o menos rápida por acción biológica con la consiguiente liberación de elementos minerales y gaseosos. Esta reacción produce nuevas sustancias que se asocian con los componentes minerales para formar parte de las fracciones finamente divididas del suelo. Esta propiedad afecta de manera marcada la retención del agua, la estructura, el color y la temperatura de los suelos.Además del pH y el contenido de materia orgánica, es importante el contenido de macronutrientes (nitrógeno, fósforo, calcio, potasio, magnesio y azufre) y micronutrientes (boro, zinc, etc). La disponibilidad de estos nutrientes para la planta está condicionada por una serie de factores entre los que se incluyen: la concentración y forma química del elemento, el régimen hídrico, la capacidad de intercambio catiónico, etc.1.4.3 Propiedades biológicas las propiedades biológicas del suelo están relacionadas con la actividad de los organismos que lo habitan. Los organismos del suelo (ej. lombrices, termitas, hormigas, hongos, bacterias etc.) juegan un papel muy importante en la descomposición de los resíduos orgánicos en el suelo al fragmentarlos, ingerirlos, excretar los y afectar sus características fisico-químicas. La actividad biológica que se observa facílmente es aquella realizada por los organismos de mayor tamaño (turrículos de lombrices, nidos de hormigas, etc.), mientras que en la mayoría de los casos la actividad de los mícro-organismos no es tan fácil de observar. Sín embargo existen micro-organismos benéficos como el rizóbio que viven asociados con las raíces de plantas leguminosas, tienen efectos positivos en el crecimiento de la planta y cuando están presentes y activos generan la formación de estructuras redondeadas (nódulos) facilmente detectables en las raíces de la planta. los procesos biológicos son afectados directa o indirectamente por otras propiedades del suelo como la temperatura, la humedad, la aireación, el pH, la materia orgánica y la disponibilidad de nutrientes. La actividad de los organismos del suelo y de las plantas tiende a ser mayor en condiciones de temperaturas altas y humedad que con temperaturas bajas y sequía.Una forma alternativa de agrupar las propiedades indicadoras de la calidad del suelo es el cambio de ellas a través del manejo agrícola, pecuario ylo forestal. Las propiedades se pueden clasificar en permanentes y modificables:Una propiedad permanente es aquella que ha sido determinada por los materiales parentales (factores de formación) y que en la práctica no es posible cambiarla. Por ejemplo, la textura del suelo se considera como una propiedad permanente, ya que no es posible cambiar la distribución relativa del tamaño de las partículas que conforman la fracción fina « 2mm). De igual manera, es difícil cambiar la pendiente pronunciada de las tierras de laderas, a corto plazo.Una propiedad modificable es aquella que es susceptible de ser alterada en forma apreciable a través de acciones de manejo regularmente aplicadas en un suelo. Un ejemplo es la disminución del contenido de materia orgánica de un suelo en su parte superficial (0-15 cm), el cual puede ser modificado a través de la estimulación de una mayor mineralizaron por prácticas como quemas periódicas, lat-oreo contínuo, erosión, etc.El conocimiento tradicional campesino se deriva de una integración intuitiva de la respuesta de los sistemas agrícolas a través del tiempo a factores que afecten la producción (manejo, fertilidad,clima,plagas, etc) (Barrios et al., 1994;Barrios. 1995).El conocimiento del suelo por el campesino es un valioso recurso que se esta perdiendo cada día. La meta consiste en combinar lo mejor de la ciencia de suelos con lo mejor de los conocimientos locales por parte del campesino. La palabra mejor aquí se refiere tanto a los métodos para resolver problemas y al conocimiento básico como a los avances tecnológicos específicos. El objetivo consiste en usar los dos sistemas de conocimiento para prevenir y resolver problemas locales de manejo del suelo, logrando así una mayor efectividad que la alcanzada por cada uno de los sistemas en forma individual.De lo anterior queda claro que la integración de la experiencia de los agricultores con el conocimiento técnico -científico permite a ambos grupos de actores un mejor entendimiento del recurso suelo y de esta forma será posible tomar mejores decisiones para su manejo.Existen muchas prácticas de manejo que el agricultor-usuario que conoce, experimenta y vive del suelo, puede adoptar para asegurar y aumentar los rendimientos de sus cultivos. La comprensión de la importancia de estas prácticas y su adopci6n será mayor si es posible una comunicación efectiva, a través de un lenguaje común, entre el agricultor y el técnico.Durante el estudio de las secciones 2 y 3 de esta guía será posible rescatar e integrar los conocimientos local y técnico para determinar las propiedades permanentes y modificables de los suelos. Esto permitirá tomar mejores decisiones de manejo a nivel de finca al estar más cercanos a la realidad del agricultor. Una mejor comunicaci6n técnico -agricultor promovería una mayor adopción de nuevas opciones tecnológicas disponibles.Ejercicio 1.1 Identificación de los Factores y Procesos deObjetivo -/ Al finalizar los ejercicios los participantes estarán en capacidad de idenlificar los procesos y factores que intervienen en la formación de los suelos,1. Dependiendo del número de participantes forme grupos de cuatro a seis miembros y entregue a cada grupo una copia del instructivo para realizar el ejercicio.2. Conceda 30 minutos para que el grupo pueda discutir y analizar las preguntas y posibles respuestas. Solicite a los participantes que refieran sus ejemplos a sus parcelas o a su microcuenca, 3, Solicite que nombren a un coordinador para que exponga sus respuestas, Pueden hacer uso del papelógrafo, retroproyector o cualquier aIra ayuda que esté disponible.4 Al final de las exposiciones proporcione ejemplos y sugerencias que ayuden a los grupos a ampliar sus conocimientos sobre el tema.• Hoja de instrucciones pera cada uno de los grupos • Papelógrl:.lfo y papel • Proyector • Acetatos y marcadores lavables A partir de los conocimientos adquiridos por usted en esta capacitación, anote según corresponda una X en los espacios para cada uno de los factores y procesos de formación de los suelos que pueda identificar. Es decir, señale cuales son factores y cuales son procesos. Tomando como referencia los dibujos que se encuentran en la margen izquierda de esta hoja de trabajo, escriba en la línea debajo de cada dibujo el factor de formación de suelos con el que usted lo asocie; luego escriba en la tercera columna, tres o más elementos que intervengan en ese factor de formación identificado.Factores de Formación Tomando como referencia los dibujos que se encuentran en la margen izquierda de esta hoja de trabajo, escriba en el cuadro situado a la derecha de cada dibujo el proceso de formación de suelos con el que usted lo asocie; luego escriba en la tercera columna, tres o más elementos que intervengan en ese factor de formación identificado, Procesos de Formación En esta práctica se trata de capacitar a los participantes en el desarrollo de habilidades, destrezas y actitudes, para conocer en forma práctica y de una manera sencilla, algunas propiedades físicas, químicas y biológicas de los suelos. Esto con la finalidad de que los productores puedan tratar de conocer su parcela desde una perspectiva más amplia y darle un manejo adecuado.El suelo es el medio donde se produce el desarrollo de las plantas .. Su formación es el producto de una larga, compleja y muy dinámica interacción de todos sus componentes tanto orgánicos como inorgánicos (ver Sección 1.1 l.Como todo organismo el suelo tiene sus características ñsicas, químicas y biológicas que permiten predecir la cantidad y calidad de los componentes y nutrientes presentes para la producción agrícola.Las características químicas se utilizan frecuentemente para medir la fertilidad de los suelos, y dependen en forma directa de las propiedades físicas y biológicas. En consecuencia la producción o productividad de un suelo depende de la relación entre ellas.En esta guía no se pretende hacar un profundo estudio de las características del suelo, sino más bien se trata de introducir a los participantes conceptos e ideas para que puedan ínterrelacionar de manera global los indicadores locales de calidad del suelo con las características permanentes y modificables del mismo.Al finalizar la práctica, el participante estará en capacidad de:./ Evaluar las diferencias de textura en los suelos de la localidad ../ Identificar las diferentes formas de la estructura de los suelos ../ Aplicar la metodología práctica de campo para identificar la estructura de un suelo ../ Identificar el color de suelos locales como una ayuda para determinar su calidad.,/ Identificar la importancia de la consistencia como una característica física en su relación con la calidad de los suelos.,/ Evaluar la velocidad de infiltración de agua en suelos de la localidad.,/ Identificar mediante una metodología sencilla las variaciones en pH que puedan presentar los suelos locales.,/ Identificar mediante una metodología práctica de campo las variaciones en contenido de materia orgánica que puedan presentar los suelos locales.,/ Identificar las variaciones en el contenido de carbonatos libres que se presentan en los suelos.,/ Identificar la acción de los macro -organismos en la estructura del suelo (lombrices),/ Identificar estructuras (nódulos) en raíces de plantas leguminosas como resultado de la relación simbiótica con micro -organismos del suelo (rizÓbio).1. Cada técnico facilitador será responsable del orden en la mesa de trabajo.2. Verifique al inicio del taller que lodo el material y el equipo se encuentren en cantidad y calidad suficientes para desarrollar eficientemente la practica.3. Consulte con el coordinador general cuando se presente algún inconveniente.4. Fotocopie con anticipación el número adecuado de las orientaciones para cada participante.5. Divida al total de los participantes en grupos de cinco personas.6. Distribuya al grupo el material necesario para el desarrollo de la práctica.7. Cada sesión de práctica por grupo de participantes durará 20 minutos.8. Proceda a la autoevaluación de conocimientos de los participantes sobre el tema. Pídales que contesten las preguntas que se encuentran en sus instructivos (puede hacerlo en voz alta y en forma general).9. Desarrolle cada ejercicio o práctica de acuerdo con su auditorio.10. Si en la mesa van a utilizar reactivos químicos advierta del peligro a cada participante. 12. Haga una demostración de la práctica.13. Motive a cada participante a realizar la práctica inmediatamente.14. Verifique que cada uno de los participantes tenga en su momento la asistencia adecuada para el desarrollo de la práctica.15. Asegúrese de que el participante anote en su cuadro de resultados y en el cuadro general de resultados del instructor la información obtenida de su suelo.16. Asegúrese de explorar el impacto que produjo la práctica sobre la manera de pensar de los participantes, (tome como referencia las respuestas a las preguntas al inicio de la practica). 17. Identifique fortalezas y debilidades en el conocimiento adquirido.Instrucciones para el Instructor Antes de! inicio de cada práctica encontrará una serie de preguntas que le servirán como indicador del conocimiento previo que sobre el tema tiene la audiencia.Es importante que le haga entender a la audiencia que esto no constituye un exámen, sino un método usado para saber el punto de partida para optimizar el tiempo de capacitación, y al finalizar, tener un parámetro con el cual evaluar el aprovechamiento obtenido por los participantes durante la práctica.Las preguntas se proporcionan por escrito para que seleccione el método más conveniente para presentarlo ante la audiencia. Por ejemplo, puede presentarlas en voz alta, entregarlas para ser contestadas en forma grupal (recuerde que ellos cuentan con estas preguntas en el material de trabajo), u organizar una discusión plenaria para conocer las respuestas que el grupo dé a las preguntas, o cualquier otra forma que crea se adapte con m~s conveniencia a la audiencia.Anuncie que en una sección plenaria se compararán estas respuestas con las que usted ha preparado a cada pregunta.A continuación se incluyen las preguntas que se presentan en todos los ejercicios, seguidas por las respectivas respuestas. Es la característica física de los suelos determinada por la cantidad de cada uno de sus componentes minerales: arcilla, limo y arena.Fracción más gruesa de los componentes minerales del suelo, pueden encontrarse arenas desde muy gruesas (no mayores a 2.00 mm) hasta muy finas (no menores a 0.02 mm), según la escala ISSS (Sociedad Internacional de las Ciencias del Suelo).Fracción intermedia de los componentes minerales del suelo, (menor a 0.02 mm, pero mayor o igual 0.002 mm de diámetro)Fracción más fina de los componentes minerales del suelo, con un diámetro menor que 0.002 mm. Es la fracción con mayor responsabilidad en la respuesta a los procesos ñsicos, químicos y biológicos del suelo.Práctica 1.2 . Determinación de la Estructura del Suelo Respuestas Para la pregunta 1Se le llama de esta manera a las variadas formas en que se agrupan los diferentes componentes de los suelos, está influenciada por la descomposición de los materiales orgánicos, por los óxidos e hidróxidos de hierro, y las fracciones arcillosas.Es la mínima fracción que determina la estructura de un suelo.Para la pregunta 3Es aquella estructura del suelo alargada que presenta todas o la mayoría de sus caras planas.Práctica 1. El color negro indica la presencia de materia orgánica, el rojizo indica la predominación de óxidos de hierro, y el amarillento la predominancia de óxidos de aluminio.Práctica 1.4 Determinación de la Consistencia del SueloLa consistencia se define como la resistencia a la deformación ofrecida por una masa de suelo bajo condiciones específicas dE< humedad,Es la característica de la consistencia que se determina en un suelo húmedo y que se identifica por la capacidad de los suelos para adherirse o pegarse a otras superficies,Característica de los suelos que consiste en la posibilidad de tomar diferentes formas al ser moldeados en condición húmeda,Facilidad de perturbación que presenta un suelo en condición seca, Práctica 1.5 Velocidad de Infiltración de Agua en el SueloEs la rapidez con la que el agua añadida pasa a través del suelo,El tipo de uso y el manejo del suelo al influenciar la actividad biológica afecta la porosidad.1-38 S _ _ Recurso _ _ -- Son aquellos organismos observables a simple vista como las lombrices, escarabajos y hormigas que habitan el suelo.Fragmentan los residuos orgánicos en pedazos más pequeños los cuales a su vez son ingeridos por estos u otros organismos, que luego los excretan. Las excretas resultantes pueden a su vez ser fragmentadas de nuevo, ingeridas y excretadas por otros organismos y esta cadena de eventos se repite muchas veces.La capacidad fragmentadora de muchos de estos organismos reduce el tamaño de los residuos orgánicos y permite que se descompongan más rápidamente. La actividad de las lombrices puede reducir la susceptibilidad a la erosión de los suelos y además su movimiento en el perfil del suelo promueve un aumento en la aireación y la infiltración de agua en el suelo. Son aquellos micro-organismos que no pueden observarse a simple vista como las bacterias y la mayoría de los hongos.Existen micro-organismos benéficos y dañinos para la producción agrícola. Entre los micro-organismos benéficos tenemos bacterias encargadas de convertir nutrientes orgánicos provenientes de la materia orgánica en nutrientes inorgánicos utilizables por los cultivos. También hay hongos y bacterias que generan enfermedades y pérdidas en los cultivos. El manejo biológico de la fertilidad del suelo persigue aumentar el ímpacto de los micro-organismos benéficos y reducir el de los dañinos.Esta es una relación de mutuo beneficio donde tanto la planta como el microorganismo viven mejor juntos que separados. Este es el caso del rizobio (bacteria) y de las micorrizas (hongo) los cuales son capaces de suministrar nutrientes adicionales a los cultivos a cambío de ser hospedados en las raíces de la planta.1-411. En este momento usted se encuentra en la mesa de inscripción e información.• Lo identificarán con un gafete que indique su nombre, comunidad (por el color del gafete) o institución. • Le proporcionarán las instrucciones correspondientes a su participación esperada.• Le entregarán un sobre con: papel, programa, lápiz y ficha de registro.• Recuerde que cuando usted lo necesite, en ésta mesa le proporcionarán información en relación con las actividades generales de esta capacitación.2. Mesas de ejercicios y prácticas:• Usted formará parte de un grupo de participantes que rotará por cada mesa de trabajo, hasta completar todas las prácticas. • En cada una de ellas encontrará un instructor el cual le guiará en la práctica o ejercicio que corresponda. • Atienda las instrucciones con relación a las actividades que deberá usted presentar en cada área de trabajo. • Al dirigirse a su instructor hágalo de manera cortés, de igual manera lo hará él.• Cualquier duda con respecto a la práctica expresela con confianza a su instructor.• Las prácticas que usted realizará, número de mesa y el nombre de sus instructores son los siguientes: Orientaciones para el Participante 1. Tome una muestra de suelo del I/olumen de una medida de una cucharada sopera.2. Colóquela en su mano izquierda.3. Con el dispensador agréguele agua en forma lenta (gota a gota). Con su mano derecha manipúlelo hasta que tome consistencia pegajosa, con la cual usted formará una bola con 2 a 5 cm (1 a 2 pulgada) de diámetro. Para que usted pueda identificar la clase textural a la cual pertenece el suelo, compárelo con el cuadro y las figuras que aparecen a continuación: Para finalizar:1. Marque con una 'X: en la hoja de trabajo del agricultor la categoría a que corresponde el suelo analizado.2. Marque de igual manera en el control que lleva su instructor. ./ Identificar y clasificarla la estructura de una muestra de suelo.• Dispensador con agua ¿Qué se entiende por estructura de un suelo?2. ¿Qué es un agregado?3. ¿ Qué significa estructura prismática?Orientaciones para el Participante 1 , Tome en sus manos una porción de suelo, procurando mantenerlo con la forma original hasta que proceda a manipularlo.2. Presiónelo ligeramente al principio y agréguele poco a poco mayor para permitir que se rompa, de tal manera que deje al descubierto la forma original de los agregados.3. Cuando el suelo haya cedido, usando la cartilla identifique la estructura de este suelo a través de: • La forma que haya tomado • El tamaño y de la forma obtenida • La dureza 1-49 Agregados diferenciados y bien formados. moderadamente duraderos y visibles.Agregados duraderos y evidentes en suelos no alterados; se adhieren débilmente entre si.i admiten desplazamientos y se separan fáCilmente en suelos alterados. .1. Marque con una 'X' en la hoja de trabajo del agricultor la categoría a que corresponde el suelo analizado. • Tome una muestra de suelo de 5 cm (2 pulgadas). Si es parte de un terrón determine el color en parte de la muestra que estaba adherida al terrón (la parte que ha estado expuesta puede estar afectada), • Determine el color del suelo utilizando directamente la tabla Munsell, • Anote el color en la hoja de resultados • Anótelo también en el cuadro de su instructor,Práctica 1.4 Determinación de la Consistencia del Suelo Objetivo ,¡' Reconocer la consistencia de un suelo como una característica físíca que tiene relación con su calidad.• Dispensador con agua Instrucciones para el Participante 1. Medición de la consistencia en suelo seco al aire.• Tome un terrón de suelo seco y trate de romperlo manualmente.• Por este medio usted medirá la dureza de los suelos.• Anota en su hoja de resultados cualquiera de las condiciones que se cumpla a continuación:El terrón es débil, se rompe fádlmente y se desmenuza en polvo o gránulos.El terron es débilmente resistente a la presión y fácilmente quebradizo duro entre los dedos pulgar e índice.El terrón es muy resistente a la presión, puede ser quebrado con las I Duro a muy duro manos con dificultad, pero no podrá ser quebrado con la presión de los dedos índi.::e :t: [!u!ll:ar. I 2. Medición de la consistencia en suelo húmedo.A. Si su muestra está seca.• Para lograr la humedad recomendada agregue agua gota a gota. Permita que la película de humedad desaparezca de la superficie de la muestra, y luego proceda a determinar la consistencia. • Tome un terrón de suelo húmedo y trate de romperlo manualmente.• Anote en su hoja de resultados cualquiera de las condiciones que se cumpla a continuación:El terron se desmenuza fácilmente bajo una ligera presión de los dedos pulgar e índice.El terron se desmenuza bajo moderada presión entre los dedos; débilmente resistente a la presión y fácilmente quebradiza entre los dedos puklar e índice, pero se distillllue claramente su resistencia.El terrón es muy resistente a la presión, se desmenuza con dificultad.• Anótelo también en el cuadro que su instructor tiene disponible.B. En caso de que su muestra esté húmeda, proceda como en el caso anterior a partir del inciso 2.i Medición de la consistencia en suelo mojado Para lograr la humedad recomendada, agregue agua gota a gota sobre la muestra con la cual a estado trabajando, luego proceda a medir la consistencia.• Tome el terrón de suelo mojado y trate de frotarlo entre sus dedos pulgar e índice de manera repetida. • Con esto, usted estará midiendo dos parámetros conocidos como adherencia y plasticidad de los suelos. • Anote en su hoja de resultados cualquiera de las condiciones que se cumpla a continuación:No adherente El suelo no se adhiere a 105 dedos pulgar e índice.El suelo al manipularlo se adhiere entre 105 dedos.El suelo al manipularlo se pega con facilidad a los dedosEl suelo no toma fonna cuando se manipula.El suelo forma un cordón que se rompe al presionarlo moderadamente entre los dedos.Se forma el cordón y requiere de mucha presión para defonnar la masa de suelo al manipulano.• Anótelo también en el cuadro que su Instructor tiene disponible.Práctica 1.5 Determinación de la Velocidad de Infiltración de Agua en el Suelo Objetivo Que el participante pueda verificar mediante una metodología sencilla las diferencias en infiltración de agua de los suelos.• Cilindro de lata o PVC (15 cm de altura x 15 cm de diámetro)• Tabla de Madera ¿Qué factores influencian la infiltración de agua en el suelo?Instrucciones para el Participante 1. Graduar un extremo del cilindro con una marca a los 5 cm usando la regla graduada 2. Introducir el cilindro en el suelo hasta 5 cm Poner la tabla de madera en un extremo del cilindro y con la ayuda del martillo clavar verticalmente el cilindro hasta la marca de 5 cm. Deben quedar 10 cm del cilindro fuera del suelo. Agréguele una medida de agua (25 mi) procurando que no se derrame fuera del frasco.Agite la solución durante 2 minutos utilizando la varilla de vidrio.Introduzca en la solución por unos segundos la cinta de color que le proporcionará su instructor.Práctica 1.7 Determinación de la Materia Orgánica del Suelo Objetivo Que el participante pueda identificar variaciones en el contenido de materia orgánica de una muestra de suelo mediante una metodología práctica.• Gotero con agua oxigenada al 35% Preguntas orientadoras para iniciar la práctica 1, ¿Qué es la materia orgánica del suelo?2, ¿Qué es la descomposición de la materia orgánica?3, ¿Qué funciones tiene la materia orgánica en el suelo?Instrucciones para el Participante Advertencia:Los reactivos son peligrosos y pueden quemar la piel, por lo que se deben usar con precaución y siempre en presencia del instructor.1, Tome una muestra de suelo (ún terrón de aproximadamente 5 cm/2 pulgadas), 2, Aplíquele con su gotero un par de gotas de agua oxigenada, 3, Observe el grado de efervescencia (burbujeo), 4, Clasifique la muestra de suelo siguiendo la tabla que aparece a continuación.1-71, -NegativoEl suelo no presenta efervescencia (burbujeo) + Leve El suelo presenta muy poca efervescencia (apenas algunas burbujas)El suelo presenta moderada efervescencia (se pueden ver muchas I I burbujas)+++ Severo 1 El suelo presenta mucha efervescencia (se pueden ver gran cantidad de I burbujas)1.Anote el resultado en su ficha.Que el participante pueda identmcar las variaciones en el contenido de carbonatos libres presentes en los suelos.• Frasco con ácido clorhídrico al 10% y gotero Advertencia:Los reactivos son peligrosos y pueden quemar la piel, por lo que se deben usar con precaución y siempre en presencia del instructor.Tome una muestra de suelo (un terrón de aproximadamente 5 cm /2 pulgadas).Aplíquele con su gotero un par de gotas de ácido clorhídrico al 10%.Observe el grado de efervescencia (burbujeo) y determine la presencia de carbonatos, de acuerdo a la tabla siguiente.-Negativo El suelo no presenta efervescencia (burbujeo) + Leve El suelo presenta muy poca efervescencia (apenas algunas burbujas)El suelo presenta moderada efervescencia (se pueden ver muchas burbujas)El suelo presenta mucha efervescencia (se pueden ver gran cantidad de J burbujas)~-Anote el resultado en su ficha.Anótelo también en el cuadro que su Instructor tiene disponible~ Práctica 1.9 Estimación de la Actividad de Macro-organismos del SueloPreguntas orientadoras para iniciar la práctica 1. ¿Qué son los macro-organismos del suelo?2. ¿Qué hacen los macro-organismos del suelo?3. ¿Qué importancia tienen los macro-organísmos del suelo?Identificar un suelo rultivado adyacente a un suelo de bosque o pastura establecida y utilizarlos como ejemplo de suelo perturbado y no perturbado respectivamente. a) Actividad 1La presencia y actividad de lombrices de tierra puede estar asociada con el número de turrírulos dejados en la superficie del suelo adyacentes a la salida de sus galerías. Cabe señalar que esta medida puede variar considerablemente de aruerdo a los tipos de lombrices predominantes. Por ejemplo, hay lombrices que no depositan turrírulos en la superficie del suelo sino en sus galerías, pero hay otras que depositan turrículos en la superficie cada vez qJI! están activas (com. pers.P.Lavelle). De esta manera el conteo de turrículos por unidad de área permite tener una primera idea del tamaño y actividad de las poblaciones de lombrices en suelos bajo un uso dado.1. Colocar una cuadrata de 50 x 50 cm al azar sobre el suelo y contar el número de turrículos de lombrices dentro del área. Realizar esta operación cinco veces en el suelo perturbado y no perturbado respectivamente.b) Actvídad 2La remoción rápida de un monolito (terrón) de suelo y su posterior desagregación permite tener un contacto más directo con los macro-organismos y las estructuras producidas por su acción en el suelo (Lavelle. 1988;Anderson & Ingram, 1989, Feijoo el al, 1999).1. Identificar tres puntos al azar en cada tipo de uso del suelo.2. Remover rápidamente monolito (terrón) de suelo de 25 cm de largo y ancho por 30 cm de profundidad. Se facilita la operación si inicialmente se crea una zanja alrededor del monolito para maniobrar mejor la profundidad requerida y evitar se escape algún macro-organismo.3. Ubicar el monolito sobre una lámina de plástico extendida sobre una mesa 4. Con un machete cortar tres capas de 10 cm de profundidad y ubicar en bolsas plásticas rotuladas 0-10 cm. 10-20 cm y 20-30 cm.5. Vaciar en una vasija plástica, rotulada de la misma forma que las bolsas, los contenidos de las bolsas respectivas.. 6. Proceder a fragmentar cada capa por separado.7. Recoger con cuidado todos los macro-organismos en frascos de vidrio con formol (5%) para lombrices y con alcohol (70%) para otros organismos.- 2. ¿Qué hacen los micro-organismos del suelo?4. ¿Qué es una relación simbiotica?Identificar un área de suelo en cultivo de frijol y donde preferiblemente fue aplicado poco o ningún fertilizante nitrogenado.1. Escoger 10 plantas al azar en la parcela y marcar con un cordel blanco para fácil identificación.2. Con ayuda de un azadón remover un monolito (terrén) de suelo de 30 x 30 cm y 30 cm de profundidad que incluya a cada una de las 10 plantas marcadas en el paso 1 yel volúmen de suelo que contenga sus raíces.3. Ubicar cada monolito (terrón) en recipiente plástico con agua y dejar por 10 minutos. Remover cuidadosamente con agua el suelo restante en las raíces.4. Identificar la raíz principal, las raíces secundarias y verificar la presencia de nódulos (formaciones cilíndricas pequeñas adheridas a las raíces) 5. Contar el número de raíces que presenta nódulos así como el número de total de nódulos en toda la raíz.EI_~ _ _ NmnI\"\"_ -Diferenciar entre factores y procesos de formación de suelos mediante el conocimiento del modelo simplificado de formación de suelos (MSFS).• Describ¡r los factores y procesos que afectan la formación de un suelo.-Identificar propiedades diagnósticas de los suelos y diferenciar propiedades permanente,~'f y propiedades modificables de los mismos. ~.'Conocimiento Técnico Conocimiento Local /1, . 'Í. ¿Qué es un factor de formación de suelo?~ ¿Qué es un proceso de formación de suelos? \" ¿Qué es una propiedad diagnóstica permanente y una modificable? .,. -.í Los participantes priorizan los indicadores del calidad de suelo que han sido previamente identificados1, ¿ Cómo se describen las diferencias entre un suelo bueno y uno malo?2,¿Cómo se conoce si un suelo es excelente, regular o malo para producir?3.¿Consideran que en sus parcelas existen diferentes tipos de suelos?4,¿Podrían describir los límites de los tipos de suelo de su finca?Identificación y Prlorizao/ón de Indicadof9S Locales de Calidad del Suelo 2-5Indicador es un parámetro que se usa para medir algo. Un descriptor puede tener varios indicadores (Hünnemeyer, 1997). Para cada descriptor se buscan uno o varios indicadores que miden el cambio. Un ejemplo de un descriptor es el uso de fertilizantes en relación con la productividad agrícola y el indicador es el uso de fertilizantes por hectárea.Es posible determinar indicadores locales de la calidad del suelo a partir del conocimiento tradicional campesino. Este enfoque permite conocar el estado del recurso suelo (conjunto básico de indicadores) tal como lo percibe el agricultor y así poder definir conjuntamente el mejor uso que se le pueda dar.Un indicador de calidad del suelo es una característica que permite definir el estado de las propiedades físicas, químicas y biológicas que hacen que un suelo sea apto o no para determinadas labores de producción.La descripción técnica de indicadores de calidad del suelo corresponde a un lenguaje científico, que se emplea por personas con formación académica en ciencias del suelo.Los indicadores locales corresponden a un lenguaje que ha sido adoptado en forma tradicional por los productores de una comunidad para describir características del suelo, usando palabras entendibles por ellos mismos.La concertación entre indicadores técnicos y aquellos localmente descritos es un objetivo de la metodología presentada en esta Guía. Se trata de compatibilizar el lenguaje técnico -cientifico con el lenguaje local para que tanto los investigadores y los extensionistas como los productores compartan un mismo lenguaje sobre el recurso suelo y su manejo.Esta metodología permite identificar y priorizar los indicadores que usan localmente los agricultores en sus parcelas para evaluar la calidad del suelo. También a través de este proceso se identifican los criterios utilizados para juzgar los suetos y determinar cuáles factores o indicadores son más importantes.A continuación se presenta el proceso metodológico desarrollado por Burpee y Turcios (1997). En síntesis, son dos pasos: una lluvia de ideas en la que los productores tienen la oportunidad de juzgar sus suelos, para establecer las diferencias entre un suelo bueno y uno malo y la priorización de los indicedores locales identificedos.Se solicita a los agricultores presentes en la reunión, que mencionen los indicadores o características que conocen para determinar sí un suelo es bueno, regular o malo para los diferentes usos que le dan a la tierra. Seguidamente se agrupan como descriptores de una misma característica todos aquellos indicadores que se expresan con distintas palabras (indicador local) pero que significan lo mismo. Posteriormente, cada indicador se escribe en tarjetas de cartulina.Para este paso, se pueden utilizar dos procedimientos. El primero es el de la matriz de dos entradas (Geilfus, 1997), como la que aparece a continuación.Se aguachinaIndicador\"Indicador Frecuencia Orden de priorización -------Se aguachinaEl procedimiento para llenar la matriz es el siguiente:-Explicar a los agricultores que lo que se propone es determinar entre todos los indicadores identificados, cuáles son los más importantes y obtener un listado de indicadores priorizados.-Preparar una matriz de dos entradas con el mismo número de líneas y de columnas que de indicadores identificados. Escribir en la primera línea y la primera columna un indicador por celda, siempre en el mismo orden. Repetir el ejercicio comparando todos los indicadores uno con otro. Al final, se tendrá la mitad de la matriz llena.~ Para cada indicador se debe contar cuántas veces aparece en la matriz y así se podrán ordenar por orden de frecuencia. El indicador que aparezca más veces es el más importante. Esta comparación por pares es menos subjetiva que otros métodos de priorización. Un ejemplo de análisis de frecuencias basado en la tabla anterior pOdría ser:Indicador I Frecuencia Orden de priorizacjón Tierra lavada O 3Se aguachinaSe sugiere emplear este método con grupos de agricultores que tengan un bajo nivel de escolaridad, debido a que como se verá más adelante, la metodología alternativa requiere de un mayor dominio de la lectura y la escritura._cJón yPrlodz1ld6n H ~ t.<1CIIÚIS de caJIdad HI SueloClasificación por tarjetas 1. Se divide a los agricultores en grupos de tres a cinco dependiendo del volúmen de la audiencia.2. Como en la metodología anterior se obtienen los indicadores de los productores y se anotan en tarjetas de 7.5 x 12.5 cm (3 x 5 pulgadas).3. Cada agricultor separa las tarjetas en tres grupos, según la importancia que se le conceda a cada indicador (alta, media y baja) (Figura 2.1). -Luego cada agricultor valora individualmente cada indicador dentro de los grupos de tarjetas y le aSigna un orden de alta a baja importancia, colocando la más importante encima y debajo las que le siguen en orden de importancia (Figura 2.2).4r----.2 Valoración de cada tarjeta y asignación del orden de importancia según el concepto de los productores.-A continuación el relator asigna números de orden a cada indicador, de acuerdo con el orden de importancia señalado por el productor. La información generada por cada agricultor se registra en la matriz que aparece en el Cuadro 2.1.Cuadro 2.1 Matriz de priorización de indicadores por agricultor dentro de cada grupo.Relator:1• Valor promedio = Total entre número de puntajes por hilera.En este paso el instructor explica al grupo y en especial al relator como debe llenarse el Cuadro 2.1.a. Se debe tomar el grupo de ta~etas de alta importancia y se anota el orden de priorízación que se dio individualmente a cada indicador, y b. se toma el grupo de tarjetas de importancia medía y en este punto el relator continúa con el número de príorízación que le sigue al último que pertenE:lce a las tarjetas más importantes.Si el grupo de tarjetas de alta importancia contiene ocho indicadores, lógicamente el ultimo indicador priorizado tendrá el lugar octavo. Al tomar las tarjetas de importancia media ya priorizadas, el indicador que tenga el lugar número 1 le corresponderá el lugar de príorización noveno. Si el total de tarjetas en este grupo es de cinco, la última le corresponderá el lugar trece de príorización. Para el último grupo de tarjetas se utiliza el mismo criterio .. Cada cuadro contendrá la información específica de cada indicador. Con esta base se establece el promedio de puntajes, que surge de la suma de los puntajes en cada hilera dividido por el número de puntajes.Finalmente, se presenta la matriz con todos los indicadores para validarla en sesión plenaria con todos los productores. Se trata de averiguar si todos están de acuerdo con la priorización a que se ha llegado y con los indicadores presentados.Un ejemplo de las respuestas de varios agricultores se muestra en el Cuadro 2. -Después que el relator anota en la matriz el número da la priorización que la corresponde a cada indicador por agricultor consultado, estos valores se suman en la columna Total. El número en esta columna se divide entre el número de agricultores del grupo (para el ejemplo se dividió entre tres) para obtener el valor promedio de priorización de este indicador y para este grupo.La última columna a la derecha en el Cuadro 2. a metodología de estudios de caso ha sido creada con el objetivo de permitir rofundizar en aspectos de mayor interés. En este caso el interés se centra en los dicadoms locales de calidad de suelo y el contexto en el cual son usados.na vez realizadas las actividades 2.2.1 y 2.2.2 seleccionar agricultores que hayan ostrado interés, conocimiento y capacidad de servir como informantes claves para alizar estudios más detallados a través de una guía de estudios de caso sobre el onocimiento local de los suelos y su manejo (Anexo 6.1 ) (Barríos et al., 1998). sta guía está diseñada para ser utilizada a lo largo de un día de campo en la finca e cada agricultor seleccionado cuando a través de conversaciones informales se coge la información mencionada en la guía (Gracia, 1989). Es importante revisar idadosamente la guía antes de visitar al agricultor e incorporar fluidamente los ¡mas de la guía en la conversación .a guía recoge los siguientes aspectos:1. Información sobre la finca: Tiempo de uso, tenencia, área, etc.2. Mapeo participativo de la finca: Elaboración de un mapa dibujado por el agricultor y/o entrevistador resaltando tipos de suelo y sus limites, historia de uso y uso actual en relación a la pendiente, etc. Esta información es corroborada en los siguientes pasos al utilizar el mapa recien realizado para ubicar los suelos identificados y su uso histórico y actual.3. Conocimiento de Suelos: Persigue identificar las propiedades descriptivas de cada tipo de suelo. 4. Prácticas de Manejo de Suelos: Persigue identificar la distribución de cultivos, preparación, abonamiento, prácticas conservacionistas, etc. 5. Organismos del Suelo: Persigue identificar organismos beneficiosos y dañinos para promover o limitar su presencia respectivamente. 6. Factores que guían la toma de decisiones de manejo: Persigue identificar indicadores integrativos locales (p.ej. color del suelo, plantas nativas predominantes), que provean información importante en la toma de decisiones de manejo.7. Aspectos Generales: En esta sección se presentan ejemplos imaginarios que incorporan varios aspectos mencionados en los puntos anteriores simultáneamente, como ocurren en la naturaleza. A través de esta sección se pueden corroborar datos previamente recogidos. 8. Muestreo de Suelos asociado a cada estudio de caso: Se recogen muestras representativas de los tipos de suelo descritos por el agricultor, (georeferenciar si es posible)Cabe resaltar que el mapeo participativo a nivel de finca, que permite definir los usos históricos y actuales del suelo en relación a su posición en la pendiente, es de gran importancia para el estudio de microcuencas hidrográficas. Esta actividad complementa y se nutre de la información generada en las guías 2 (Análisis Foto-Topográfico) y 3 (Mapeo Participativo de Microcuencas). El impacto de la disposición de los usos del suelo con relación a la pendiente en el funcionamiento de la microcuenca no ha sido ampliamente estudiado. Esta propuesta metodológica persigue un enfoque sistematico que permita evaluar el impacto de nuevas opciones y arreglos espaciales I temporales en el manejo de los recursos naturales a escala de microcuenca.Ejercicio 2.1 Identificación y Priorización de Indicadores Locales de Calidad del Suelo Objetivo En una situación de simulación, los participantes obtendrán y priorizarán los índices locales de la calidad del suelo en fincas de un grupo de productores.Orientaciones para el Instructor 1. Elija un grupo de participantes que hará el papel de técnicos y otro que hará el papel de 'productores', en una proporción de un técnico por cada cinco productores 2. Entregue al grupo de agricultores la agenda respectiva de trabajo. Los técnicos no deben conocer la agenda de los productores 3. Proporcione a los técnicos las instrucciones para realizar el trabajo siguiente:Realizar 'la lluvia de ideas', como se describe en el texto -Agrupar los indicadores que tienen un mismo significado, de acuerdo con las propiedades del suelo que se describieron anteriormente. Elaborar las tarjetas con los indicadores y seleccionar el método para la priorización Realizar la priorización -Obtener los promedios de cada grupo y del grupo totalValidar en sesión plenaria con productores los indicadores y la respectiva priorízación.Explicar las relaciones entre los indicadores locales y las propiedades del suelo.• Tarjetas de cartulina de 7.5 x 12.5 cm ( 3 x 5 pulgadas)• Marcadores de punta gruesa (diferentes colores)• Hojas de papel para rotafolio • Rollo de cinta adhesiva ('masking tape')• Hojas de trabajo: Matriz de priorización de indicadores por agricultor en cada grupo (Cuadro no.1) Matriz final de priorización de indicadores !)or grupo (Cuadro no. 2) listado de participantes Tiempo sugerido: 60 minutos. Usted ha sido seleccionado para hacer el papel de productor durante este ejercicio. Siga las instrucciones que aparecen a continuación:1.Usted forma parte de un grupo de cinco productores que saben leer y escribir.2. El instructor, en la información de retomo mostrara a los participantes un caso de obtención de indicadores como el de la comunidad de San Antonio, Sulaco, (Honduras), mediante información como la siguiente:listado de indicadores surgido de una lluvia de ideas con los productores ~-en las aldeas 1_ Suelo profundo o grueso 2. Color negro: variable con dos clases: la que 'aguachina' la tierra (se llena de agua y el maíz se queda tullido (suelo que se ende)3. Producción con buenos rendimientos.4_ Tierras sueltas 5. Un suelo es bueno de acuerdo con la maleza, no es mala maleza: 'quilete', chíchíguaste, verdolaga. • El puntaje de cada celda es el resultado del ejercicio previo de la clasificación de las tarjetas en baja, media y alta importancia en forma Individual por cada agricultor y anotada en la matriz del Cuadro 1. b Es la suma de las filas, correspondiente a cada indicador. Es el total entre número de puntajes obtenidos en cada indicador.•,¡-'tu \"t1'j he • Los participantes elaborarán una lista de indicadores que ellos mismos utilizan para determinar la calidad de suelos a nivel local.• Los participantes priorizan los indicadores locales de calidad de suelo que han sido previamente identificados.i ¿Cómo describen ustedes las diferencias entre un suelo bueno y un suelo malo?'i ¿Cómo saben ustedes que un suelo es excelente, regular o malo para producir?~ ¿Consideran que en sus parcelas hay diferentes tipos de suelos?1-¿Podría usted describir los límites de cada suelo en su finca?Indicador Ys. Descriptor• Indicador: -Parámetro que usamos para medir -Eiemplo: El uso de fertilizantes por hectárea• Descriptor: -Est:. formado por varios indicadores y un indicador puede servir para varios descriptores -Eiemplo: El uso de fertilizantes en relación con la productividad agrícola¿Qué Enledemos por Indicador? • Se agrupan indicadores (locales) baio el mismo concepto para elaborar una lista.Priorización de Indicadores a. Matriz de dos entradas ,/ Los participantes en colaboración con los técnicos compatibilizarán los elementos del lenguaje local con el lenguaje técnico.,/ Los participantes diferenciarán entre los indicadores locales de calidad de suelo que son pennanentes y los indicadores locales de calidad de suelo que son modificables.1. ¿Sabe usted qué es la textura del suelo?2. ¿Sabe usted qué es la acidez o alcalinidad de un suelo?3. ¿Cómo se le conoce localmente a las siguientes condiciones de suelo (tenninología local)?• Suelos que se encharcan frecuentemente • Suelos que son fáciles de labrar • Suelos buenos la 'feria del suelo' se hace con el objetivo de que los productores desarrollen destrezas para determinar, a través métodos sencillos y simples, propiedades físicas, químicas y biológicas de los suelos y poder relaciOnarlas con los conocimientos de carácter local que ellos han adquirido en el mane;o del suelo de su parcela.La primera decisión que hay que tomar es nombrar un coordinador. Esta persona estará a cargo todo lo que compete a la logística y el material que se necesitará.También será necesario la selección de los representantes (productores) de las comunidades donde previamente ya han sido identificados los indicadores locales de calidad del suelo. Esto lleva a la elaboración de un programa a desarrollar el día de la feria, Qué propiedades y con qué métodos se determinan en la feria las propiedades: ~-_._-------+_...:..c.:;\"\"\"---'--------------\":=------------'-----i• Actividad Biológica: • Macro-organismos • Conteo de Turriculos (Lombrices),--~ _ _ _ ~_~•_M_i_cro-_o..:rg:..a_n_ism_os _ _ -LI _\" _Conteo de Nódulos (Rizobio)• LogísticaEl evento debe estar planificado para realizarse en un día y debe durar alrededor de 8 horas, De estas se dedica a/reGedor de un 25% a la capacitación teórica y el resto lo constituyen las practicas. La experiencia con productores indica que el evento se debe realizar preferencialmente un sábado. Otros aspectos logísticos se describen a continuación.a. Se agrupan los participantes por comunidad y cada uno recibe su respectivo material de trabajo, donde también se encuentra una ficha para anotar los resultados de cada propiedad de suelo determinada.b. Previo al desarrollo de los ejercicios se debe tomar en cuenta que para cada propiedad o característica del suelo a determinar es necesario un técnico, una mesa con su silla respectiva, el afiche donde se menciona el nombre de la propiedad que se determina, el rango de los posibles resultados que puederl obtenerse y el equipo y materiales, e, Seguidamente los participantes rotan mesa por mesa hasta completar la ficha de trabajo. Por su parte el técnico anota en el afiche de su mesa de trabajo los resultados individuales de cada agricultor, d..Finalmente las fichas de trabajo de cada agricultor y los resultados en cada afiche son correlacionados y transcritos a un cuadro para que en una plenaria sean presentados a los agricultores, 3.2 Relación de las Propiedades Diagnósticas con los Indicadores Locales de Calidad del Suelo (ILeS)En esta sección se analizan los indicadores locales de calidad del suelo desde el punto de vista de propiedades permanentes y modificables,Esta compatibilización se desarrolla a través de la integración de las secciones(1) el suelo nuestro recurso natural más valioso y (2) identificación y príorizaci6n de indicadores locales de calidad de suelo, por parte del técnico que dirige la obtención y priorización de los indicadores, Una de las dificultades en el proceso de obtención de ILeS robustos que permitan la extrapolación del conocimiento local sobre el manejo del suelo a otras zonas estriba en que se requiere de un nivel mínimo de compatibilización del conocimiento local utilizado por los agricultores con los términos técnicos utilizados rutinariamente por los profesionales de la ciencia de la pedología y la edafología. Este proceso puede entenderse en su forma mas simple como la elaboración de un diccionario de sinónimos o equivalencias entre los conceptos emanados del conocimiento local y aquellos que han sido técnicamente descritos.El marco teórico para la compatibilización de indicadores locales con indicadores técnicos está basado en la premisa de que el suelo es un cuerpo natural organizado como un continuo a través del paisaje y no como una unidad discreta a nivel de parcela o finca. Este concepto es fundamental para entender cómo las propiedades intrínsecas de un suelo están más directamente relacionadas al entomo ambiental en el cual dicho suelo se ha formado y evolucionado (Factores y Procesos) que con el manejo y uso agronómico al cuál este haya sido sometido por periodos variables de tiempo. Si se considera el suelo como un producto resultante (ver modelo simplificado de formación en la Sección 1.) Y se agrupan sus propiedades en permanentes y modificables, se facilita el proceso de compatibilización del conocimiento local con el conocimiento técnico de suelos. Lo anterior se basa en que los atributos y características heredadas de los factores de formación en un suelo tienden a convertiste en propiedades permanentes mIentras que atributos condicionados por el ambiente (por ej., procesos de pérdidas o ganancias de nutrientes) tienden a convertirse en propiedades modificables. Por ejemplo, la pendiente es frecuentemente reconocida por los productores a nivel local como un atributo que condiciona la calidad del suelo. La pendiente de una unidad de suelo en términos generales es un atributo heredado por la fisiografía del paisaje en donde ese suelo evoluciona (laderas vs plano) el cual no es factible cambiar fácilmente. Por otro lado, la fertilidad de un suelo también es regularmente reconocida a nivel local como un atributo de calidad (tierra uberrima vs tierra lavada) y de hecho a modo general la fertilidad de un suelo es un atributo que se considera que se puede cambiar a través de enmiendas (por ej., fertilizantes, incorporación de abonos verdes).La discusión anterior propone un sistema sencillo para lograr la integración del conocimiento local con atributos y propiedades reconocidas técnicamente. Este sistema se aplica una vez finalizado el proceso de priorización de indicadores locales detallado en la sección 2. En esta etapa, tanto el conocimiento local como el técnico, deben coexistir en igualdad ya que se trata de compatibilizar el conocimiento local con el lenguaje técnico y no viceversa. Este proceso se puede visualizar en dos pasos que se realizan por parte del grupo técnico en colaboración con informantes clave seleccionados a partir de los talleres. Este proceso es liderado por el técnico y los informantes clave actúan como colaboradores.El primer paso: Elaboración de la matriz de indicadores locales y propiedades técnicas del suelo para cada una de las comunidades entrevistadas.Dentro de este se deben clasificar tentativamente las propiedades en permanentes o modificables. En el Cuadro 3.1 se presenta un ejemplo de dicha matriz que resultó del trabajo de campo desarrollado en la Cuenca del Río Tascalapa, Yoro (Honduras). Para efectos de capacitación solo se presentan los indicadores locales que ocuparon los primeros cinco lugares en cada comunidad.El segundo paso: Integración y ranqueo de cada grupo de indicadores priorizados Esta etapa se define en función de si el atributo se puede cambiar (modificable) o no (permanente), en términos prácticos a través de acciones que rutinariamente se hacen en una parcela o en una finca (por ej., labranza, fertilización, irrigación). En el Cuadro 3.2 se presenta el ejemplo de la integración y ranqueo de cada grupo de indicadores priorizados que se genera a partir del Cuadro 3.1. Se selecionó la columna que corresponde a la Comunidad de Santa Cruz. Finalmente el conjunto de indicadores permanentes (Cuadro 3.3.) priorizados por parte del grupo de informantes clave constituye la materia prima que determina el potencia! base de utilización del suelo a nivel local sin modificaciones externas. En otras palabras, estos indicadores son determinantes de la calidad del suelo debido a los factores de formación y se denominan indicadores permanentes. Ejemplos d e . estos son la pendiente, la profundidad del suelo y la clase textura!. La priorización de ~: este grupo de indicadores a nivel local se debe entender como un proceso iterativo ~ entre informantes y el técnico hasta llegar a un conjunto mínimo de indicadores cuya ,,;característica príncipal es que no se pueden prácticamente alterar con métodos :t' sencillos. El ranqueo relativo de estos obedece a la percepción que los informantes tienen de su papel individual en determinar la calidad del suelo.El conjunto de indicadores modificables (Cuadro 3.4.) se debe priorizar en forma separada y ordenarlos en función del intervalo de tiempo necesario para ejecutar un cambio en el corto, mediano y largo plazo. Estos indicadores constituyen el potencia! de cambio en función del manejo. Por ejemplo, la presencia de lombrices de tierra y la actividad biológica alta en un suelo puede ser entendida como una propiedad modificable en función del manejo ya que es posible cambiarla. Dicha acción se puede realizar en el corto plazo mediante adiciones de materia orgánica, aportes de nutrientes y cobertura vegetal necesarios para el desarrollo de estos organismos.Otras propiedades modificables tales como la acidez o alcalinidad de un suelo tienen un marco de tiempo diferente, Finalmente, existen propiedades modificables como el color y la estructura del suelo las cuales requieren de intervalos de tiempo aún mayores. El cambio de color del suelo es el resultado de varios procesos actuando simultaneamente a través del tiempo, Las adiciones de residuos orgánicos, acompañados por una mayor actividad biológica y cobertura del suelo promueven un cambio del color del suelo a largo plazo. De esta manera, es posible observar un oscurecimiento del color del suelo por el aumento en el contenido de materia orgánica, Cuadro 3.4 Conjunto de indicadores modificables para la comunidad de Santa Cruz.Orden x :• Este orden de impor1ancia se obIlene de la matriz d<> prioriza<:ión d<> indícadores por agricultor dentro de cada grupo, donde se calcula el promedio individual de cada Indieador. por lo tanto el indicador con menor valor es el más importante (primer lugar) ~ar.l. comunidad y .si .............. ente.Propiedad permanente 'Propiedad modificable a corto plazo 'Propiedad mod_. _no piazo • Propieded modificable a largo plazo El resultado final de la compatibilízación del lenguaje técnico con el lenguaje local en términos de tLeS lo constituyen estos dos grupos de indicadores para cada comunidad y tipo de suelo, Se espera que este proceso aproveche el conocimiento local y adapte el conocimiento técnico potencial izando la comprensión de técnicos y productores a cerca del suelo.• Usos Potenciales -Ordenamiento -Monitoreo -Planificación -Clasificación -Elabora planes de acción .. Conservación de suelos yagua -PASOLAC -Proyecto LUPELos indicadores biológicos tienen el potencial de captar cambios en la calidad del suelo por su naturaleza integrativa. Ellos reflejan simultáneamente cambios en las características físicas, químicas y biológicas del suelo.En la matriz del cuadro 3.1 que recoge la experiencia del trabajo de campo en la Cuenca del río Tascalapa ( Honduras), fue evidente el importante rol de las plantas nativas como indicadoras de la calidad del suelo. Dos trabajos adicionales (de Kool, 1996, Barrios y Escobar, 1998), enfocados hacia indicadores biológicos de la calidad del suelo en la cuenca del río Cabuyal, Cauca (Colombia), también resaltan la importancia de las plantas nativas como indicadoras de la calidad del suelo.La Figura 3.1. resume el proceso de generación de conocimiento local sobre plantas nativas como indicadoras de la calidad del suelo. En los suelos pobres predominan ciertas plantas y las comunes a lodos los suelos se desarrollan con dificultad. En los suelos fértiles hay el predominio de otras plantas y las comunes a todos los suelos crecen vigorosamente. La observación por parte del agricultor de este fenómeno en varios suelos y fincas a través del tiempo constituye su experiencia directa y forma la base de su conocimiento en este tema.Es importante introducir en este momento el concepto ecológico de la sucesión natural. Los ecosistemas naturales y agroecosistemas responden similarmente a los procesos degradativos y regeneratívos a través de la sucesión natural.Durante estos procesos, las plantas y organismos del suelo mejor adaptados gradualmente reemplazan a los menos adaptados a través de la selección ejercida por cambios en las características del suelo (p.ej. durante la degradación o regeneración de la fertílidad del suelo). El conocimiento local recoge observaciones de los cambios en poblaciones de plantas generadas por cambios en la calidad del suelo.-, . El siguiente enfoque conceptual y metodológico persigue consolidar una metodología que permita la sistematización de la información generada a partir de plantas indicadoras de la calidad del suelo.La profundización de aspectos etnobotánicos relevantes relacionados con el _ conocimiento local sobre el uso de plantas nativas como indicadoras de características del suelo pueden abordarse a través de informantes claves usando la guía de estudio de caso (Apéndice 6.1). Resultados usando esta metodología en Colombia permiten generar una primera lista de plantas indicadoras (cuadro 3.5). Esta actividad permite captar el resultado de historias de uso de la tierra y al mismo tiempo priorizar y corroborar la información que será generada en el siguiente paso metodológico. El uso de la dinámica de las malezas como medida integradora de cambios en la calidad del suelo se basa en el concepto de seleCCión natural mencionado anteriormente. Las malezas, en general, son plantas pioneras que proliferan en suelos de muy diversas calidades y las poblaciones predominantes suelen asociarse con un conjunto de características físicas, químicas y biológicas del suelo. A medida que las condiciones del suelo cambian, para bien o para mal, la composición y abundancia de las malezas que componen estas poblaciones también cambia.Como mencionamos anteriormente el conocimiento local sobre plantas nativas como indicadoras de la calidad del suelo se basa en la experiencia acumulada de los agricultores. De esta manera, el seguimiento sistemático de estos cambios en el tipo y cantidad de malezas a la vez que se siguen los cambios en propiedades físicas, químicas y biológicas del suelo permite establecer una relación práctica y concreta entre los indicadores locales y los indicadores técnicos.Se utilizan cuadratas de madera o metal de 1 x 1 m lanzadas al azar sobre el área a ser estudiada para determinar la diversidad y abundancia de malezas. Esta operación se realiza 2-4 veces al año. La información generada aquí es complementada por la información sobre el conocimiento local de plantas indicadoras.Cuando se evaluan parcelas grandes se puede utilizar el método destructivo donde se cortan tadas las malezas a ras del suelo y luego se agrupan por tipos y se cuentan. En caso de parcelas pequeñas utilizar métodos no destructivos que a pesar de algo laborioso, permiten remuestrear en las mismas áreas a través del tiempo.1. Para estimar el número mínimo de cuadretas por parcela se calcula el área mínima representativa de la siguiente manera. En la primera fecha se recorre la parcela en zíg-zag y se realiza muestreos utilizando la cuadrata y contabilizando únicamente el número de especies. A partir de la segunda cuadrata solo se anotan las especies nuevas que no aparecieron en la primara cuadrata y así sucesivamente hasta llegar a una cuadrata en la cual no se encuentran nuevas especies. El número de esa cuadrata corresponde al número de cuadratas necesarias para tener una muestra representativa de la población de malezas del lugar.2. Lanzar cuadrata al azar en la parcela a evaluar, contar especies presentes y arrancar planta luego de registrada. Dejar marca visible y permanente en el lugar de muestreo de manera de no muestrear la misma localidad en el futuro.3. En caso de muestreo no-destructivo inicialmente contar las plantas de cada tipo sin arrancartas. Es práctico subdividir la cuadrata de 1 x 1 m en 4 sub-cuadratas de 0.50 x 0.50 m, con un cordel para facilitar el conteo.4. En caso de no conocer la planta presente, se le atribuye un número de identificación en la hoja de datos e igualmente se cuentan los individuos.5. Una vez estimado el número mínimo de cuadratas requeridas el muestreo se distribuye al azar en zig-zag a través de la parcela y se registran las especies y su número en la hoja de dalas.6. Posteriormente se calcula la frecuencia relativa = número de parcelas en que se registra la especie x 1001 número total de parcelas.7. Finalmente se calcula la abundancia relativa'\" número de individuos de cada especie x 100 I número tolal de individuos contabilizados de ladas las especies en cada parcela La combinación de ambas fuentes de información, la dinámica de malezas y el conocimiento local sobre plantas indicadoras, ofrece la oportunidad da validar la relación encontrada entre plantas indicadoras por los agricultores y la calidad del suelo definida a través da parámetros físicos, químicos y biológicos. La generación de un conocimiento híbrido, sistematizado y validado, se convicta en una poderosa herramienta para el agricultor al guiar su toma de decisiones de manejo agrícola.Los indicadores de calidad de suelo tienen como objetivo final identificar momentos críticos en el ciclo agrícola que requieren de una acción de manejo. El uso de plantas indicadoras, pertenecientes al conocimiento local, y su relación con acciones de manejo facilitaran la adopción de nuevas tecnologías mejoradoras de la calidad del suelo. Este enfoque permitirá usar plantas indicadoras del mejoramiento de la calidad del suelo y con las que el agricultor está familiarizado.La necesidad de evitar la especificidad de sitio y de hacer que los resultados locales sean válidos para areas más amplias requiere trabajar simultáneamente a varias escalas. Esto implica que los estudios a nivel de parcela deben detecta .. cambios en el suelo inducidos por la introducción de nuevos sistemas de producción y que el impacto de la adopción de estos sistemas de producción, a su vez, sea detectable a escala de microcuenca (Barrios 1998).El uso de microcuencas hidrográficas como unidades de estudio es útil pues estas generalmente tienen límites físicos claramente demarcados y el efecto de cambios en el uso del suelo pueden ser medidos en el agua. La calidad del ague (ej. contenido de pesticidas, nitratos, ate.) se convierte en una medida integradora del uso que se de al suelo a través de sistemas agrlcolas dentro de la microcuenca.Esta capacidad de monitoreo con una medida integradora permite la identificación de una línea base asociada con el tipo de uso que se esté dando a la microcuenca. Una vez determinada la estabilidad de esta línea base, con relación a algún parámetro de calidad del agua, es posible identificar el impacto de la introducción de nuevas opciones tecnológicas a la microcuenca en procesos que afectan al parámetro considerado.Los estudios sobre sistemas alternativos de producción que permitan una intensificación ecologicamente aceptable de la producción agrícola se basan en el aumento de la eficiencia de uso del espacio, agua y nutrientes. La diversificación y combinación estratégica de componentes en el tiempo y el espacio permite un uso más eficiente del recurso suelo (eIAT, 1994). Un ejemplo consiste en la combinación, en la misma parcela, de cultivos que utilizan diferentes profundidades del suelo. Por otro lado, el uso de sistemas que promuevan el aumento de la materia orgánica del suelo puede generar efectos múltiples al promover la estructuración de suelos desagregados o •polvosos•, aumentar la capacidad de retención de agua y por lo tanto duración de la disponibilidad hídrica para los cultivos, y también al incrementar la disponibilidad de nutrientes.El uso de sistemas de barbechos mejorados y de abonos verdes persigue acelerar el proceso de recuperación de la fertilidad en suelos degradados y el aumento de la disponibilidad de nutrientes. El aumento en la eticiencia de uso de nutrientes está basado en la sincronización de la disponibilidad de nutrientes con la demanda por el cultivo lo que implica mínimas pérdidas al ambiente. De esta manera, el impacto de la adopción de sistemas alternativos de manejo del suelo de este tipo pueden tener un efecto medible en la calidad del agua.Los indicadores de calidad de suelo usados en la actualidad y aquellos en desarrollo deben estar ligados a 108 valores de calidad de agua de tal manera que puedan proporcionar un diagnóstico temprano a escala de parcela representativa/sistemas de producción de la magnitud de potenciales problemas a escala de la microcuenca.~eiiIn_\"'~_~DIa~ eoplosh_LoeaItIII_Calldadda 3-17 Este enfoque parte de la base que los cambios generados en el suelo por los sistemas de producción dentro de una microcuenca pueden ser detectados a escala de parcela a través de ICS pero el efecto de los usos del suelo en la microcuenca puede ser detectado en la calidad del agua. El reto consiste en establecer correlaciones suficientemente robustas entre los ICS y los indicadores de calidad de agua corno manera de evaluar la calidad del suelo a escala de microcuenca.Ejemplo de uso del enfoque:Basado en datos generados a través de múltiples encuestas realizadas en la subcuenca del río Cabuyal (aprox. 7000 ha) es posible presentar un escenario típico para utilizarlo corno ejemplo del enfoque. Idealmente, se hace un mapeo del uso del suelo en las fincas dentro de la microcuenca (ver sección 2.2.3) para establecer su relación con la línea de base del parámetro medido en el agua. Las estaciones de monitoreo de agua están ubicadas en puntos críticos que permitan medir la calidad del agua que integra el uso dado al suelo en distintas partes de la microcuenca (Figura 3.3). Las medidas a realizar incluyen el caudal y la calidad del agua a través de parámetros como: concentración de pesticidas, nitratos, etc. En este caso asumiremos que el parámetro medido es el nitrato, el cual está asociado al uso excesivo de gallinaza (estiercol avícola, usado por >80% de los agricultores de la zona) en la producción agrícola. Como tenemos dos temporadas lluviosas/ciclos de cultivo esperaríamos encontrar dos picos de concentración de nitrato en el agua durante el año asociados con la aplicación de gallinaza (p. Ej. 100 unidades/m' como valor hipotético). Este valor representa la línea base que integra el uso actual de la tierra donde 5% del área presenta bosques, 65% cultivos y 30% barbechos naturales o descansos. Un tiempo después de la adopción de barbechos mejorados (p. Ej. 20%) Y sistemas de barreras vivas doble-propósito (p. Ej. 30%), los cuales promueven el reciclaje de nutrientes y la reducción de pérdidas, se evalúan nuevamente los contenidos de nitrato en el agua (Fig. 3.4). Se observa que los picos de concentración de nitrato son menores a pesar que siguen asociados con los momentos de lluvia y se han reducido a la mitad de la concentración inicial (p. Ej. 50 unidades m'). Esta reducción puede relacionarse con cambios en el patrón de uso de la tierra donde se ha duplicado el área bajo bosque (ahora 10% del total) posiblemente como resultado de una menor demanda de leña de los bosques ribereños ya que puede ser parcialmente suplida por la adopción de barbechos mejorados con árboles leguminosos de rápido crecimiento. También podemos ver un aumento en el área cultivada, a 70% del área total, posiblemente como reflejo del efecto de los barbechos mejorados en disminuir el área anual bajo descanso. Cabe resaltar que una proporción considerable del área bajo cultivo, 30% del área total, ha incorporado barreras vivas doble-propósito permitiendo un mayor reciclaje de nutrientes en las fincas. Por otro lado, las áreas bajo barbecho natural se han reducido como consecuencia del uso de barbechos mejorados de carla duración, los cuales requieren de menor tiempo para regenerar la fertilidad de los suelos y por lo tanto hay más área disponible para la agricultura.Figura 3,4. Reducción de pérdidas de nutrientes y su detección en el agua en microcuenca bajo manejo que incrementa el reciclaje. Fuente: Barrios, (1998).En este momento es posible realizar una evaluación del impacto, entre otros factores, de la incorporación de sistemas de barbechos meíorados y de barreras vivas doble-propósito resultando en una reducción del 50% de la concentración de nitrato en el agua (Fig. 3.5). La adopción de sistemas de barreras vivas/barreras de captura de nutrientes (30% del área total) y de sistemas de barbechos mejorados (20% del área total) resultó en * Reducción apri. 50% del nitrato en el agua Figura 3.5. Estimación del impacto de adopción de sistemas de producción que generan menores pérdidas al ambiente a través de su efecto en la calidad del agua. Fuente: Barrios (1998).A pesar de que este ejemplo es una versión imaginaria y simplificada de la realidad en el campo, se ilustra el enfoque a medida que nos movemos de escenarios simples a otros más complejos. También asumimos que los rendimientos se han mantenido o mejorado a través del uso de tecnologías más eficientes en el uso de nutrientes y por lo tanto generado un aumento en la rentabilidad agrícola y el bienestar del agricultor y su familia. El contínuo monitoreo de los rendimientos de los cultivos a través del tiempo son evidentemente parte de las actividades de este enfoque. ./ Relacionar los indicadores locales con las propiedades del suelo;./ Compatibilizar los elementos del lenguaje local con el lenguaje técnico;./ Diferenciar entre los indicadores locales de calidad de suelo que son permanentes y los indicadores locales que son modificables.1. Retome el ejemplo y los resultados que obtuvo en la Sección 2. Presente a los participantes el listado de indicadores priorizados, y pida su aprobación antes de iniciar el ejercicio. ;a Este orden de im;:tortaneta se obtiene de la matriz de prioriZaci6n de indicadores por agricultor dentro de cada grupo, donde se calcula el promedio individual de cada indicador, por lo tanto el indícador con menor valor es el más importante (primer lugar)~ara la comunidad '1 asi sucesivamente.Propiedad permanente e Propiedad modtfieable a corto plazti • Los participantes serán capaces de relacionar los indicadores locales con las propiedades diagnósticas técnicas.• Los participantes en colaboración con los técnicos compatibilizarán los elementos del lenguaie local con el lenguaie técnico. ¿CÓIllO lo Logralllos?• Se agrupa a los participantes por comunidad y se les entrega la ficha de trabaio.• Previo al desarrollo de los eiercicios, es necesario un técnico, una mesa y su silla, el afiche que describe la propiedad que se determina y el rango de los posibles resultados, así como el equipo y materiales.¿CÓIllO lo Logralllos?• Las comunidades rotan mesa por mesa, completando la ficha de trabaio, el técnico anota en el afiche de su mesa de trabaio los resultados individuales de cada agricultor.• Finalmente las fichas de trabaio de cada agricultor y los resultados en cada afiche son correlacionados y transcritos a un cuadro consolidado para que en una plenaria sean presentados a los agricultores.Relacion entre Propiedades Diagnósticas e Indicadores. Locales De Calidad de Suelo• El obietivo es lograr un nivel mínimo de compatibilidad entre el conocimiento local manejado por los agricultores con los términos técnicos utilizados rutinariamente por los profesionales de las ciencias del suelo •• Esta compatibilización se desarrolla a través de la integración de las secciones \"el suelo nuestro recurso natural más valioso y la identificación y pr;orización de indicadores locales de calidad de suelo\".ILCS-3.8De Calidad de SueloLocal Técnico 1 1 -----1 ~.\" , ' j , ¿CÓIllO se Integra?-El primer paso:-Elaboración de la matriz de indicadores locales y propiedades diagnósticas técnicas para cada una de las comunidades entrevistadas.-El segundo paso:ILCS-3.10 La adopción de sistemas de barreras vivas/barreras de captura de nutrientes (30% del área total) y de sistemas de barbechos mejorados (20% del área total) resultó en La mejor manera de medir los objetivos planteados en esta guia, es poder establecer la diferencia en cuanto a destrezas, habilidades y conocimientos que los participantes ganaron despues de pasar por el proceso de cada una de las secciones y confrontarlo con las preguntas de autoevaluación que se aplicaron antes del envío al desarrollo de esta Guía, Antes de la aplicación de la evaluación final de conocimientos, el instructor debe tomar en cuenta lo siguiente:1, Que esta evaluación puede perfectamente ser cambiada, por lo que la presente evaluación de esta Guía solo es para orientación, 2. Debe tomar en cuenta que por cada sección lo que evaluamos es el cumplimiento de cada objetivo planteado y focalizado hacia el logro de resultados.3, Goma instructor compartirá las respuestas que ha fonmulado en cada pregunta con los participantes, Por lo tanto usted debe aclarar con ellos algunos aspectos que pueden aún no estar claros, A-5Evaluación Final de ConocimientosA continuación se le presenta una serie de preguntas referentes al contenido de esta Guía. Su propósito, es medir el grado de habilidades, destrezas y conocimientos adquiridos durante el desarrollo de cada una de la secciones. No se pretende calificar rigurosamente. Solo queremos establecer la diferencia en su grado de avance después de haber estudiado la Guía.Tenga presente lo siguiente:1. Lea completamente la evaluación y trate de tener una vision integrada de su contenido.2. En las preguntas de encerrar solo existe una respuesta.3. Tenga en cuenta que al tenninar de contestar, el instructor compartirá con usted las respuestas que él ha fonnulado en cada pregunta. Por lo tanto usted tendrá la opurtunidad de aclarar con él y con sus compañeros algunos aspectos que pueden aún no estar definidos.Marcar con un 'X' la respuesta correcta. .Relacione cada una de las columnas que se presentan a continuación y coloque en el parentesis el número correspondiente.1. Falsa, Los indicadores locales corresponden a un lenguaje que ha sido adoptado por los productores de una comunidad, en forma tradicional, para describir características del suelo, usando palabras entendibles por ellos,Verdadera, La identificación y clasificación de las propiedades permanentes de un suelo nos permite orientar mejor la planificación y manejo de este recurso, Ya que nos definen el marco potencial del mejor manejo y uso que se le puede dar al suelo,Falsa, La textura de un suelo no es una propiedad modificabl~. Una propiedad modificable es aquella que es susceptible de ser cambiada en forma apreciable a través de las acciones de manejo regularmente aplicadas a un suelo. Un ejemplo de una propiedad modificable es el contenido de materia orgánica de un suelo en su parte superficial, puesto que en términos práctiCOS es factible modificarla, aumentarla a través de adición de enmiendas orgánicas o disminuirla a través de la estimulación de una mayor mineralizaron por el habito de practicas quemas continuadas, exposición directa de los elementos del suelo mediante la labranzaFalsa. El conocimiento campesino sobre los suelos nunca es tomado en cuenta para la planificación y manejo.El conocimiento campesino es un recurso valioso que se esta perdiendo cada día. La meta sería combinar lo mejor de la ciencia de suelos con lo mejor de los conocimientos locales. La palabra 'mejor' aquí se refiere tanto a los métodos de resolver problemas y al conocimiento básico como a los avances tecnológicos específicos. El objetivo es usar los dos sistemas de conocimientos para prevenir y resolver problemas locales de manejo del suelo, de manera más efectiva y apropiada que lo realizado por cada uno de ellos individualmente.De lo anterior queda ciaro que la integración de la experiencia de los agricultores con el conocimiento científico permite a los dos grupos de actores un mejor entendimiento del recurso suelo, y de esta forma poder tomar las mejores decisiones para manejo en relación con el estado de degradación que se encuentre.Al mismo tiempo, hay mudhas prácticas que un agricultor usuario que, conoce, experimenta y vive del suelo puede hacer para asegurar y aumentar sus rendimientos en el futuro. Esto es posible si en su lenguaje, diferente al técnico, sabe bien la condición de los suelos en sus diferentes parcelas, como cambia su condición bajo diferentes cultivos y usos, y como debe manejar el suelo para mejorar la calidad. I J .. 1. Temperatura, precipitación, velocidad del viento y nubosidad 2. Fertilización, encalado, minerales, incorporación de rastrojos.3. Perdidas, ganancias, translocaciones, transformaciones.4. Constituye el basamento de los recursos naturales renovables.5. Es el lenguaje que los agricultores han manejado para identificar la calidad de los suelos.Para la pregunta 1(4) El suelo( 5) Indicador local de calidad de suelo( 1 ) Son factores de formación de suelos.( 3) Son procesos de formacion de suelos.( 2) Son la ganancias que forman parte de los procesos de formacion de suelos.Los atributos y características heredadas de los factores de formación en un suelo, tienden a convertirse en 'Propiedades permanentes'.~ Son factores de formación de los suelos: Clima, relieve, material parental, organismos, tiempo.Cuales son las propiedades diagnósticas de los suelos: Físicas, químicas, biológicas.Los atributos condicionados por el ambiente, tienden a convertirse en 'Propiedades modificables' .A-11 Orientaciones:1. El formulario de autoevaluación puede distribuirse entre 10 o más participantes para que observen y evalúen el desempeño del instructor.2. El instructor recoge los formularios y tabula 10$ resultados. Luego traslada los puntajes al perfil de desempeño para establecer la diferencia entre el puntaje observado y el ideal.Tabulación (Respuestas SI)observado Ideal Perfil de desempeño .90 100Para establecer los puntajes y el perfil, se procede así:1. Sumar las tabulaciones en cada casilla y anotar la suma en la columna 'puntaje observado'. A continuación aparece una serie de descripciones de comportamientos que se consideran deseables en un buen instructor. Estas han sido recogidas de la literatura educativa con respecto a las características que describen un buen docente o una buena capacitación.Con este instrumento se pueden analizar cuatro dimensiones del desempeño del instructor: (1) organización y claridad, (2) conocimiento del tema, (3) habilidades de interacción, y (4) dirección de la práctica. Para cada una de estas dimensiones se incluyen descriptores frente a los cuales la persona que se autoevalúa puede marcar si el comportamiento descrito fue ejecutado o no por ella, durante la capacitación.Marque una X en la columna SI cuando usted esté seguro de que ese comportamiento estuvo presente en su conducta, independientemente de la calidad con la cual podría evaluarse su ejecución.Marque una X en la columna NO cuando usted esté seguro de que no se observó ese comportamiento.El proceso de autoevaluación tiene dos momentos: (1) cuando se está preparando para la capacitación, el instructor hace una revisión de cada ítem para recordar todos los aspectos que debe tener en cuenta para que su desempeño sea exitoso; (2) inmediatamente después de la capacitación, para reconocer los desempeños que no tuvieron lugar durante la misma, por diferentes causas.Cada instructor, en forma individual, es el primer beneficiario de la autoevaluación. Este instrumento le ayuda a mejorar su desempeño en futuras actividades de capacitación.Este formulario también puede entregarse a algunos de los participantes en la capacitación para que consignen sus percepciones acerca del desempeño del instructor. Luego, se recogen los formularios y se tabulan las respuestas usando la hoja de tabulación (A-16). b. ¿Cuando decide que debe dejar un lote en descanso? ¿Menos fertilidad, menos dinero, menos tiempo? ¿Indicadores: malezas (cual, cuanto), estructura del suelo, color? ¿Cuánto tiempo la deja descansando? ¿Qué le indica que el suelo ya esta descansado y puede ser cultivado nuevamente? ¿Cómo estima la edad de la vegetación o descanso? c. ¿Qué tipo de plantas pueden asociarse juntas en una parcela? ¿Por qué?Planta#? y planta#? ¿Tienen efectos positivos mutuos? Repetir para tratar de definir posibles relaciones alelopáticas o de beneficio mutuo.d. ¿Tiene bosque natural en su finca? ¿Cuanta área? ¿Qué utilidad le ve al bosque? ¿Tiene bosque sembrado? ¿Qué cantidad? ¿Para qué han sembrado bosque (árboles)?e. ¿Existen momentos en el año en que la falta de agua afecta a las cosechas? ¿Cuando? ¿Puede hacerse algo para reducir el efecto de la falta de agua? ¿Usted lo hace? ¿Cómo funciona? ¿Por qué?f. ¿ Qué cultivos son sensibles a la falta de lluvias? ¿Cuáles cultivos tienen raices profundas o superficiales? ¿ Qué plantas nativas tienen raíces profundas o superficiales? ¿ Qué dependencia tienen los animales de suplemento animal durante la época seca? ¿Qué importancia tienen los cultivares tolerantes a la sequía?9 ¿Cómo sabe cuando van a comenzar las lluvias, y los mejores momentos para quemar, plantar, etc.? ¿Existen algunas constelaciones, plantas o animales que le sirvan de indícadores del clima de este año? General a. En un año sin problemas de clima (lluvia y temperatura), de cada 100 semillas que pone en el suelo cuantas nacen? (no nace, disparejo, todas nacen). El crecimiento de los cultívos o árboles es rápido o lento? Vigorosos? Se observa amaríllamiento, rayas o manchas de las hojas de los cultívos o árboles? Resistencia a la sequía, plagas y enfermedades? Rendimíento?b. ¿ Cuáles son los suelos más pobres en su finca y que conocen en la zona y donde están ubicados? Necesitan fertilizante obligatoriamente o no responden ni siquiera al fertilízante.c. ¿Cuáles son los suelos más ricos en su finca y que conocen en la zona y donde están ubicados? Suelos que se pueden sembrar sin fertilizante.d. ¿Puede identificar dos perscnas que conozca que utilizan poco o ningún fertilizante y manejan bien el suelo (buenos rendimientos)?e. Puede identificar dos personas que conozca que utilizan bastante fertilizante y manejan bien el suelo (buenos rendimientos)Muestreo de suelos asociado a cada estudio de caso:Preparación de muestra compuesta: Ubicar la región central de cada tipo de suelo descrito por el agricultor. Trazar en el suelo una línea de 5 m. Con ayuda de un machete o palo. Trazar otra línea de 5 m perpendicular a la anterior de forma de crear una X. Tomar muestras en los extremos de la X y en la unión para un total de 5 muestras por cada profundidad requerida. Finalmente mezclar bien las 5 muestras correspondientes a cada profundidad para obtener así una muestra compuesta por profundidad de cada de suelo identificado. (En caso de poder georeferenciar este muestreo utilizar el punto de encuentro de las dos líneas para tomar la lectura del GPS)1 Tomar muestra compuesta (0-5,5-10, 10-20,20-4Ocm) en los tipos de suelo identificados por el agricultor como representativos de la región. 2. Tomar muestra compuesta (0-5,5-10, 10-20, 20-40cm) en los suelos identificados por el agricultor como más pobres en su finca y en la zona. [3][4][5][5][6][7][8][9][10][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] en los tipos de suelo identificados por el agricultor como más fértiles en su finca y en la zona.A-29"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0107784278.json b/main/part_2/0107784278.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2cde3c4a435e230ef85c5db75430c6f3fa8297b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0107784278.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2e8a96a5923da993e618203f6db1d1e0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e0a38329-04bc-4488-a624-561667152fad/retrieve","id":"62841690"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"38fefdf5-3859-43c8-996e-d74c16db49e0","content":"• Technical advisory grants (TAG) from IFAD Rome usually a few countries, regional/technical focus cross country, learning, innovation, piloting -3 years (€1-1.5m)• Other Rome -Regional learning, KM and innovation -One-off evaluations (contribution to project design)• • Frustrating!• Can we make the partnership more meaningful?CGIAR and IFAD today We can accelerate AR4D to impact at scale"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0121739858.json b/main/part_2/0121739858.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ffc204457f2d7b77e40c7ff574bcd5e3af4e98ae --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0121739858.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6d0e75e5c01d5282fec87052547bddc9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f21c8344-9cae-41a5-bf2f-98d146179fe3/retrieve","id":"2055175052"},"keywords":["Abiotic stress","Andean potatoes","Genebank","Genetic resources collection","PVS2","Solanum spp"],"sieverID":"37f46439-8e3d-4446-9e42-617ad5f370c5","content":"The effect of cold and sucrose pretreatment for increasing tolerance to cryopreservation was evaluated with eight diverse genotypes, six cultivars belonging to the cultivated species, Solanum tuberosum spp., S. tuberosum subsp. andigena, S. x juzepczukii and S. x ajanhuiri, and two genotypes from the wild species, S. commersonii. In vitro plantlets were cultured at either 6 or 22 °C in media supplemented with either 0.07 or 0.3 M sucrose prior to droplet PVS2 cryopreservation. The sucrose pretreatment appeared to have no positive effect on post-cryo survival. The cold-hardening pretreatment increased significantly post-cryo recovery in drought and frost tolerant cultivars. When 755 accessions, representing 10 taxa, were cryopreserved after cold-hardening, 96 % responded with at least one shoot recovering and 63 % showed a high recovery rate (40-100 %). Therefore this method is recommended for the long term conservation of diverse accessions of potato germplasm.Potato has the richest genetic diversity of any staple crop (Messer 2000). In the Andean region, currently more than 4,500 potato landraces belonging to seven Solanum species exist. Around the world, there are hundreds of improved varieties, derived mainly from Solanum tuberosum spp. tuberosum. This wide diversity needs to be preserved to secure food security for future generations. These varieties are indeed a rich reservoir of genetic characteristics to improve potato varieties and increase food supply. Cryopreservation is thereby an important tool to ensure the safe preservation of this diversity.Research on potato cryopreservation was initiated in 1977 (Bajaj 1977) and over time several methods have been developed and assessed demonstrating the advantage of cryopreservation for long-term germplasm conservation. In comparison to in vitro conservation, cryopreservation decreases material handling during storage. Therefore it minimizes labor and risks of losing samples due to human errors. Consequently there is less contamination risk. An efficient cryopreservation procedure allows plant tissues to tolerate the ultralow temperature of -196 °C of liquid nitrogen (LN) and, to withstand this LN storage for an unlimited time period; and it allows the subsequent regrowth of true-to-type plants.For the safe long-term conservation of important staple clonal crops such as potato, banana, cassava, sweetpotato, yam and other Andean root and tuber crops, international genebanks (Benson et al. 2011) are conducting research on the development of improved cryopreservation methods and the establishment of cryo-banks as part of a global strategy to securely preserve genetic resources into perpetuity. In potato cryopreservation techniques like the PVS2 droplet vitrification and the DMSO droplet method are routinely used. The PVS2 droplet method is used at the International Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru, where the largest global in vitro potato collection is maintained, comprising Andean cultivars belonging to ten diverse potato taxa. The Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) in Gatersleben, Germany, is currently cryopreserving its potato collection with the DMSO droplet freezing method (IPK 2013). The IPK collection comprises mainly European commercial improved cultivars belonging to the species Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum. The National Center for Genetic Resources Program in the United States (NCGRP) (ARS 2013) and the National Agriculture Center (NAC) in the Republic of Korea (Kim et al. 2006) also apply the PVS2 droplet vitrification method to cryopreserve potato. Finally, the Crop Research Institute (CRI) in the Czech Republic is cryo-preserving potato using an alternative ultra-rapid freezing method (Kaczmarczyk et al. 2011).The aim of the present study was to improve the PVS2 droplet vitrification method in use at CIP (Panta et al. 2006) by testing varying pretreatments that could influence potato tolerance to dehydration and freezing. Literature reviews on potato cryopreservation propose several methods to induce tolerance to dehydration and freezing (Gonzales-Arnao et al. 2008;Wang et al. 2008;Benson et al. 2011;Kaczmarczyk et al. 2011). To enhance plantlet hardiness, cold and sugar treatments have been applied during the culture of mother plantlets from which the shoot tips are excised. In this research, a cold-pretreatment of mother plants is termed ''cold-hardening''.Cold-hardening treatments at 4 °C, applied for 3 weeks (Hirai and Sakai 2000) and 1 week (Halmagyi et al. 2005) potato plantlets showed no significant improvement in comparison with the PVS2 vitrification without coldhardening. However improvement was observed when alternating temperatures [21-22/8 °C (day/night)] were applied for 1 week to improved European potato varieties following the DMSO droplet freezing method (Kryszczuk et al. 2006;Kaczmarczyk et al. 2011).Sugars (sucrose, glucose, mannitol and sorbitol) have also been applied in the shoot tip culture medium preceding exposure to vitrification or dehydration. Sucrose is the most commonly used to induce cryo-tolerance. Halmagyi et al. (2005) successfully demonstrated increased tolerance to cryopreservation by applying 0.5 M sucrose pre-culture for 24 h at 24 °C. Folgado et al. (2014) demonstrated as well an improved recovery of meristems following an elevated sucrose treatment (0.3 M) during the 2 weeks of coldhardening of mother plants.In this study, the culturing of shoot-tip-donor plantlets at a low temperature (6 °C) on a culture medium with or without high sucrose concentration (0.3 M) was evaluated using eight genotypes with a different response to abiotic stresses (frost, drought and salinity) and belonging to different species and ploidy levels (Table 1). Since, tissues are subjected to dehydration, osmotic stress and freezing during cryopreservation, we hypothesize that the cryopreservation response is linked to abiotic stress tolerance and that a better understanding of the basis of such tolerance will allow the development of more efficient cryopreservation procedures applicable to a wide range of potato accessions (Panta et al. 2014).Recently, the Andean cultivated potatoes and their wild relative S. commersonii were biochemically and molecularly studied to understand the physiological mechanisms linked to abiotic stress tolerance (Schafleitner et al. 2007;Mane et al. 2008;Vasquez-Robinet et al. 2008;Pino et al. 2013). Information from these studies is useful to improve potato cryopreservation methods.The potato clones used in this study were obtained from the in vitro collection maintained under slow growth conditions at CIP. The medium contained 4 % sorbitol, MS salts (Murashige and Skoog 1962), 2 mg/l glycine, 0.5 mg/ l nicotinic acid, 0.5 mg/l pyridoxine, 0.4 mg/l thiamine, 2 % sucrose and 0.8 % agar (SIGMA A-7002). Storage of the cultures took place at 6-8 °C under 22 lmol m 2 /s illumination with a 16 h photoperiod. Eight genotypes with differential responses to abiotic stress (drought, frost and salinity), were selected (Table 1). Plantlets were multiplied using single-node cuttings cultured in Magenta Ò GA-7 vessels containing MS propagation medium (MPM) [MS salts supplemented with 2 mg/l glycine, 0.5 mg/l nicotinic acid, 0.5 mg/l pyridoxine, 0.1 mg/l thiamine, 25 g/l sucrose and 2.8 g/l Phytagel (SIGMA P-8196)] and held at 22 °C with 45 lmol m 2 /s illumination and a 16 h photoperiod. For experimental treatments, shoots were multiplied by culturing 20 apical cuttings (*0.5-0.7 cm length) per GA-7 vessel.Apical cuttings (*0.5 cm) were excised from 3 week old in vitro plantlets. Leaves were removed and the stem was trimmed until an apical shoot tip (1.8-2.5 mm long) comprising the meristematic dome plus 4-5 primordial leaves was dissected. When the shoot tip was larger than 2.5 mm, the tip of the largest primordial leaf was cut reducing the shoot size to the desired length. Sixty to onehundred-twenty shoot tips, depending on the number of samples required for the experiment, were excised and placed on pieces of sterile filter paper (1.5 cm 2 ) on potato meristem medium (MMP: MS salts supplemented with 0.04 mg/l kinetin, 0.1 mg/l gibberellic acid, 0.07 M sucrose and 2.8 g/l Phytagel). Ten shoot tips were placed per filter paper in a randomized way when excised to avoid any bias from the length of time post excision (all shoot tips were excised within 1 to 2 h). Samples were incubated at room temperature for about 1 h before the application of the osmoprotective treatment.The shoot tips were rinsed off the filter paper in 5 ml loading solution (LS) (2 M glycerol and 0.4 M sucrose), and incubated in the LS for 15 min at room temperature. The LS was then removed with a Pasteur pipette and replaced with 2 ml ice-cooled filter-sterilized PVS2 (30 % glycerol, 15 % ethylene glycol and 15 % DMSO, dissolved in MS salts with 0.4 M sucrose, pH adjusted to 5.8) for 50 min on ice. Two minutes before the end of the PVS2 treatment period, 10 shoots were transferred to a PVS2 drop (10-15 ll) on an aluminum foil strip (0.5 9 2 cm). All manipulations of the strips were done in a Petri dish placed on ice to obtain a temperature of around 0 °C following the method developed for banana (Panis et al. 2005) and adapted to potato (Panta et al. 2006); the strip holding the shoots was then rapidly plunged into a LN filled cryotube.After one hour storage in LN, aluminum foil strips holding the shoot tips were removed from the LN one by one and rapidly dropped into 4 ml of the Sakai's unloading solution (RS) [MS salts enriched with 1.2 M sucrose (pH 5.8), sterilized by filtration] (Sakai et al. 1990) in a glass vial. Shoots were rinsed and the RS was replaced with fresh RS (*4-5 ml) and incubated 15-20 min at room temperature in the dark. (3) MS medium, at 6 °C; and (4) MS medium ? 0.3 M sucrose, at 6 °C. After 3 weeks, shoot tips were dissected and processed following the cryo-protocol outlined above. LNexposed and non-LN exposed controls of each accession were processed. Two replicates of 10 shoot tips per treatment were evaluated in three independent experiments. Survival and recovery rates were recorded 60 days after warming.Between January 2007 and March 2012, 755 potato accessions were cryo-processed in CIP's genebank applying the PVS2 droplet method using a hardening treatment at 6 °C and a 0.07 M sucrose medium. Twenty out of the frozen samples (70-100) were thawed and their viability evaluated. These together with 20 non-frozen samples were cultured following the protocol described previously but using a modified MMP [MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) with 10 ml/l coconut milk, 20 g/l sucrose, and 2.8 g/l phytagel]. Survival and recovery were recorded 60 days after thawing.Viability rates, explant survival (survival) and plants recovered (recovery), were evaluated by counting the number of explants showing a green color, and explants growing into green shoots, respectively. The recovered shoots size was about 0.5 cm or longer. Results were recorded 60 days after thawing.Results are presented as mean percentage. The experiment for measuring the cold and sugar effect after cryopreservation was analyzed following a completely randomized design (CRD). Using R and Excel programs, statistical differences between mean values were assessed by ANOVA, LSD or Kruskal-Wallis tests, according to the data normality and variance homogeneity. Survival and recovery were proportional values expressed as percentages. Since proportional data are binomially distributed, they were transformed with arcsin to reach a normal distribution. Prior to transforming the proportional data, values of 0 % were substituted by 1/4n and 100 % by (100-1/ 4n), where ''n'' is the number of units on which the percentage data was based. Arcsin formula utilized was y' = arcsin (y/100)1/2 multiplied by 180/p, to convert data to angular grades.Under cold conditions rooting and shoot growth were reduced. With the 0.3 M sucrose treatment, plantlets showed a reddish color and were elongated; leaves did not fully expand. The cv. Wila Yari was the most affected, as the rooting and growth was the lowest (data not shown).The pretreatment at 6 °C in combination with 0.3 M sucrose medium produced almost no roots. Again plantlets were reddish and leaves not fully expanded. Shoots survived after cryopreservation with significant effects of cultivar (P \\ 0.001) and temperature (P \\ 0.05) (Table 2); however the response to the two sucrose concentrations was similar, overall mean was 69 and 66 % for 0.07 and 0.3 M sucrose, respectively (data not shown). In contrast, for shoot recovery, cultivar, temperature, and also sucrose were highly significant (P \\ 0.001). Moreover a significant interaction of cultivar with temperature was observed (P \\ 0.01). Analysis of this interaction showed that hardening at the low temperature had a positive or non-significant effect on recovery; overall recovery was 48 % with 6 °C and 36 % with 22 °C pretreatment (data not shown).Results from the individual treatments (Fig. 1) showed that both S. commersonii genotypes were highly tolerant to cryopreservation with no significant effect of either cold or sucrose hardening. The cultivars Ccompis, H-1, and Pin ˜aza showed more than 50 % recovery with cold-hardening. The cv. Pin ˜aza was significantly affected by the sucrose (0.3 M) treatment. Without cold treatment, Desiree and Wila Yari were more sensitive to cryopreservation irrespective of the sucrose treatment. Tacna showed the lowest recovery rate and none of the treatments increased its recovery, indicating this cultivar was very sensitive to the cryo-procedures applied or not responsive to cold-hardening. These results suggest that a pretreatment with a high sucrose (0.3 M) concentration had no or a negative effect on recovery. However, with cold treatment and 0.07 M sucrose, overall recovery was 52 %, significantly higher than the 40 % obtained with the control treatment (22 °C and 0.07 M sucrose) (data not shown). Moreover, we observed that on average 26 % of the samples (data not shown) survived cryopreservation but failed to re-grow into whole plants.Based on the results of these experiments a cold-hardening (6 °C) culture phase was included as part of the standard PVS2 droplet vitrification protocol that will be used at CIP. This method that was successful for the most genotypes tested is schematically presented in the Fig. 2.From the beginning of 2007 up to the first quarter of 2012, 755 potato accessions representing the diversity of Andean potato accessions were processed for cryopreservation. For this, the PVS2 droplet method developed previously (Panta et al. 2006) was applied with a cold-hardening treatment at 6 °C in combination with 0.07 M sucrose medium. Results (Table 3) show that 96.4 % of accessions, belonging to 10 potato taxa, responded with at least one shoot recovering after cryopreservation; 50-80 samples of surviving accessions were cryo-stored for the long term. Shoots re-growth was always direct without intermediate callus formation. The overall survival and recovery rates were 75 and 51 %, respectively. Hence, the percentage of surviving shoots that were not able to re-grow into plantlets was 24 %; a rate that is similar to our previous experiments (see above). When the frequency of accessions showing a recovery of 0, 5-39 and 40-100 % was calculated, results showed that 62.9 % of the accessions responded with a shoot recovery higher than 40 %. Accessions belonging to S. tuberosum subsp. tuberosum and two species of known frost tolerance, S. chaucha and S. xjuzecpzukii, showed the highest recovery rates of 76, 65 and 64 %, respectively. However the number of accessions processed for these groups is low due to the low number of accessions in the CIP collection. The most represented species in CIP's collection, S. tuberosum subsp. andigena showed 51 % recovery and the lowest rate (41 %) was observed for the improved varieties (Solanum spp.). In all species, excepting Solanum spp., more than 50 % of accessions showed recovery of 40-100 %; and again to S. tuberosum subsp. tuberosum and the frost tolerant species, S. chaucha and S. xjuzecpzukii,comprised the highest percentage (81-86) of accessions with high recovery. Research has demonstrated that the addition of cryoprotectants alone often do not provide enough protection against lethal cryo-damage. Both cold and sucrose hardening treatments, either alone or in combination, have been shown to have positive effects on cryopreservation tolerance in grass, hops, yams and potato (Chang et al. 2000;Reed et al. 2003;Leunufna and Keller 2005;Folgado et al. 2014). This study has shown that a pretreatment of potato shoot-tip-donor-plantlets at 6 °C, followed by droplet PVS2 vitrification is efficient for increasing recovery after cryopreservation in most cultivars tested. The effect of cold pre-culture in PVS2 droplet vitrification has previously been studied in potato (Halmagyi et al. 2005;Hirai and Sakai 1999). These authors used a pre-culture temperature of 4 °C and the results did not show a significant improvement in comparison with control treatments. The cultivars tested in these studies were improved varieties with no or low acclimation ability. Other studies, using preculture at alternating temperatures have demonstrated that cold pre-culture of 7 days at 21 or 22/8 °C (day/night temperature), resulted in an improved recovery rate (Kryszczuk et al. 2006;Kaczmarczyk et al. 2008) when a DMSO droplet method is applied. We tested cold and sucrose hardening treatments either alone or in combination on accessions of known drought, frost and salinity tolerance such as the frost tolerant cultivars H-1, Pin ˜aza, Wila Yari and two genotypes belonging to S. commersonii, the most frost hardy wild potato species known (Bamberg et al. 2005). Also Ccompis, a cultivar that is highly utilized in the Peruvian and Bolivian Andes and of known drought tolerance but from which the reaction towards frost is not clear and the two improved drought tolerant cultivars, Desiree and Tacna, that are unable to cold acclimate, were tested.It was expected that the frost tolerant genotypes would respond positively to cryopreservation and that the sucrose treatment would enhance this response regardless their cold-acclimation ability. Both the S. commersonii frost tolerant genotypes showed a high capacity to recover from cryopreservation regardless the pre-culture temperature or sugar doses applied, suggesting that the ability for tolerating cryopreservation is due to their genetic characteristics instead of the hardening treatments. Studies have demonstrated that fully acclimated S. commersonii genotypes can withstand -10 °C (Bamberg et al. 2005) and hence it is not surprising to see such a high cryo-tolerance of this species.The frost tolerant cultivars, H-1, Pin ˜aza, and Wila Yari always responded better following the cold treatment Regarding the sucrose effect, our results were different to the positive effect recently reported by Folgado et al. (2014). Authors attribute these differences to the different culture techniques utilized for applying the sucrose treatment. In this study cultures were subjected to the cold and sugar stress immediately after stem cuttings are excised while Folgado's method applied the sucrose treatment in plantlets on 1 week cultures without an excision phase thus preventing an additional cutting stress that can result in the production of stress proteins such as ASRs (Henry et al. 2011).Cold-acclimation is used in frost tolerance studies and sugar treatments have been applied in drought tolerance research. Plant response to frost and drought implies biochemical and molecular changes. Changes in the amount and composition of membrane lipids may protect against freezing-induced injury. A drought response is mainly related to the synthesis of solutes needed for osmotic adjustment such as soluble sugars, proline, and glycine betaine. In potato, several studies have revealed the stress protecting role of the lipids in cell membranes (Palta 1994), the accumulation of several sugars and osmoprotectant substances (Mane et al. 2008;Evers et al. 2010), as well as genes and proteins for osmotic adjustment (Schafleitner et al. 2007;Carvallo et al. 2011;Pino et al. 2013), and membrane stability and oxidative homeostasis (Vasquez-Robinet et al. 2008;Folgado et al. 2014).Research on S. commersonii and an improved cultivar ''Red Pontiac'' of S. tuberosum, demonstrated that freezing tolerance in the non-acclimated stage and capacity to cold acclimate are following different physiological mechanisms (Palta et al. 1993;Palta 1994). Lipids associated with freezing tolerance in the non-acclimated state are different than those associated with increases in freezing tolerance during cold acclimation. Recently, we have shown that linoleic acid content is positively correlated to cryotolerance in freeze tolerant genotypes (Panta et al. 2009).The present study clearly highlights the large difference between survival and recovery rates. In all cases the recovery rate was much lower compared to survival rate with an overall decrease from survival to recovery of about 25 %. This emphasises the need for the development of cryopreservation protocols based on shoot recovery rates and not solely on tissue survival.Cryopreservation recovery in 80 % of the cultivated potatoes by using a cold pretreatment, paves the way for testing and applying cold acclimation on a larger scale (Panta et al. 2011). We tested this optimized method on 755 accessions and observed that the overall recovery rate was 51 %. Only four cultivars did not respond to the cryopreservation procedure, and the best response came from genotypes belonging to frost tolerant species.We demonstrated that the droplet PVS2 vitrification method preceded by a pre-culture treatment at 6 °C is suitable for application of cryopreservation for the longterm conservation of a wide diversity of potato genotypes. We also concluded that the potatoes with cold-acclimation capacity or frost tolerance are more able to respond positively to cryopreservation."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0126990938.json b/main/part_2/0126990938.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..874802eb7e3af94efcae5262ca979e7bef5b3a4f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0126990938.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"56fa7b5f65e3e7184c56ec51e3c72e4a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4cb6333e-e0a1-41af-b3df-19e806ccdcd0/retrieve","id":"-2142124854"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"25a7cf6e-cf0b-4cee-b527-ac5ff6bc1371","content":"Poor people in LMICs have greater exposure to zoonoses through livestock keeping; living in agricultural communities; interactions with peri-domestic and wild animals; less access to clean water; and, greater vulnerability to climate shocks. Although their consumption of animal source products is low, the quality of these products is poor. In addition to human health burdens, zoonoses reduce livestock productivity and are important barriers to trade in livestock products, as well as causing more difficult to quantify harms such as spillover to wildlife populations."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0132265610.json b/main/part_2/0132265610.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a486ad78d944797d3e1a8fe778adb418d7a9dafd --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0132265610.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"16a73439-d905-4824-8d03-52a5e4007f75","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0147920242.json b/main/part_2/0147920242.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..634146b2d139bbaaee74160e779db22e04c2bd9e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0147920242.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"06a7be5364eb8ad237eedda05053b80a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b736ad5d-15b0-4fd2-98bc-b549c6187c9c/retrieve","id":"-1580038017"},"keywords":["Exchange","In-vitro","Germplasm","CBSD and CMD"],"sieverID":"bc5199de-4384-4870-aa52-c9196f2ac5ba","content":"Cassava varieties resistant to cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) are needed for the food and income security of the rural poor in eastern and southern Africa (ESA). The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture led five national cassava breeding programs (Malawi, Mozambique, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda) in virus-cleaning and exchanging elite cassava germplasm resistant to both diseases. This paper documents the experiences and lessons learned from the process. Thirty-one clones (25 elite, two standard and four national) were submitted by the five breeding programs to the Natural Resources Institute and Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate Services for virus cleaning and indexing. Subsequently, ca 75 invitro virus-indexed plantlets per clone were sent to Genetic Technologies International Limited (GTIL), a private tissue culture (TC) lab in Kenya, and micro-propagated to produce ≥1500 plantlets. After fulfilling all the formal procedures of germplasm exchange between countries ≥300 plantlets per clone were sent to each partner country. National check clones susceptible to CMD/CBSD were sent only to their countries of origin. In each country, the in-vitro plantlets were acclimatized under screen house conditions and transferred to clean isolated sites for field multiplication. All the clones were cleaned of the viruses, except Tomo. The cleaning process was slow for F19-NL, NASE1, and Kibandameno and TC micro-propagation at GTIL was less efficient for Pwani, Tajirika, NASE1, and Okhumelela than for the other clones. Difficulties in cleaning recalcitrant clones affected the timeline for establishing the multi-site evaluation trials in target countries. The initiative is the one of the kind to successfully clean and exchange elite germplasm as a joint action to combat CBSD in ESA. Adequate preparation in terms of infrastructure and personnel are critical to successfully receiving and adapting the indexed in-vitro plants as new germplasm.Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is one of the most important food staples in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), ranked as the number one root crop followed by yam and sweetpotato (FAOSTAT 2017). With over 140 MT of annual root production (FAOSTAT 2017), cassava is the major source of carbohydrates in the diet of millions of people in SSA and is grown as a famine reserve crop owing to its tolerance of harsh environmental conditions (Jarvis et al. 2012;Nassar and Ortiz 2007). Moreover, the crop has enormous potential to graduate into an important economic driver within the agriculture sector in different SSA countries where entrepreneurs have started to exploit its industrial business potential to produce high quality flour, starch, beverages and animal feeds.However, the crop is threatened by two viral diseases: cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) and cassava mosaic disease (CMD), and these are currently the principal biotic factors affecting production in East and Southern Africa (ESA) (Alicai et al. 2007;Legg et al. 2011). While CMD is of economic importance across SSA, CBSD remains localized in ESA, although there is a high risk of the disease spreading to West Africa unless contained (Legg et al. 2011). CBSD is caused by two virus species, Cassava brown streak virus (CBSV) and Ugandan cassava brown streak virus (UCBSV) in the family Potyviridae, genus Ipomovirus (Mbanzibwa et al. 2009). Here, we refer to these collectively as cassava brown streak ipomoviruses (CBSIs). In addition to the two species groupings, several strains of each species have been reported (Mbanzibwa et al. 2009;Mohammed et al. 2012;Ogwok et al. 2015). These interact with the host differently (Mohammed et al. 2012;Kaweesi et al. 2014;Legg et al. 2015) and produce symptoms of varying severity that complicate the evaluation and selection processes in developing resistant varieties. A further important factor in the epidemiology of these viruses, causing CBSD and CMD, is the relative abundance of the whitefly vector, Bemisia tabaci (Maruthi et al. 2005). Whiteflies occur in greatly varying abundance in the regions where both diseases occur (Jeremiah et al. 2015), and this in turn results in significantly different levels of inoculum pressure for the two diseases. Consequently, it is essential to evaluate cassava germplasm that is potentially resistant to both CBSD and CMD in a wide range of agro-ecologies.Collaborative efforts with different national cassava breeding programs have identified germplasm resistant or tolerant to CBSD/CMD. However, these have been evaluated so far under a narrow range of conditions of environment, virus species/strains, and vector abundance (Legg et al. 2011). The exchange of germplasm between countries enhances the diversity of germplasm available to partner countries. It provides breeders with fresh opportunities to evaluate and release new varieties as well as to use them as parents in efforts to breed new genotypes resistant to CBSD and CMD.Past experiences of CMD pandemic management have underlined the significance of identifying and deploying host resistance as well as the importance of joint action among partners in the affected countries through elite germplasm exchange (Ntawuruhunga et al. 2013). Open quarantine was used effectively in efforts to manage the CMD pandemic (Mohamed 2002), but this is appropriate only under emergency conditions and where introduced germplasm is carried just a short distance over the border into the receiving country. The approach has risks of introducing other diseases/pests into new unaffected areas (Ntawuruhunga and Legg 2007). Sharing of botanical seeds is less risky, but the high level of genetic variability among individual seeds means that more time and funds are required at national level to develop promising varieties (Ntawuruhunga et al. 2013). Virus-indexed tissue culture (TC) plants are the form recognised by quarantine regulators for the exchange of elite germplasm among countries (Frison 1994;Lebot 2009;Ntawuruhunga et al. 2013). Their use also ensures that fair comparisons can be made among clones that are planted in evaluation trials without propagule-borne virus infection.Breeding for dual resistance is currently being pursued as the most cost-effective and sustainable way to manage the devastating effects of the viral diseases in ESA. Although high resistance for CMD has been found, only limited success has been documented for CBSD. The desired goal of the breeding efforts is stable genotypes with resistance to both viral diseases. Work described in this paper has helped partner countries to access clean in-vitro stocks of a diverse set of resistant germplasm as vital precursor to coordinated regional trials aimed at identifying new resistant variety options to mitigate threats of CMD and CBSD. The work was undertaken in the early stages of the project BNew Cassava varieties and Clean Seed to Combat CMD and CBSD^(5CP), and aimed at exchanging elite germplasm among the five countries most affected by CMD and CBSD for adaptability breeding.Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania and Uganda (Fig. 1) are the countries most severely affected by both CBSD and CMD and agreed to share their five best cassava clones with respect to resistance to both diseases.The targeted germplasm (Table 1) included 25 elite clones contributed by partner countries, two standard regional susceptible check clones, i.e., Kibandameno, a CMD susceptible check from Kenya, and Albert, a CBSD susceptible check from Tanzania. The elite clones were selected for exchange based on resistance to CMD and CBSD, their root yield and dry matter content. Four other clones were included as national checks as follows: Tomo (susceptible to CBSD) from Mozambique, Mbundumali (susceptible to CBSD and CMD) from Malawi, and Kiroba (susceptible to CMD) and Mkombozi (susceptible to CBSD) from Tanzania. Four main steps (Fig. 2) were undertaken in the process of exchanging and managing the elite germplasm in the target countries. Figure 3 illustrates the timelines.Between August and December 2012 each country freely agreed to submit to NRI and KEPHIS ca 25 stem cuttings obtained from asymptomatic plants of each of the best five clones (Table 1) for virus cleaning. The asymptomatic plants were used mainly to ease the task and cost of the cleaning process. To minimize chances of within-clone variation (mericlones), stem cuttings of a given clone were collected from one plant stand by breeders who had wide knowledge of the clones' agronomic performance as well as their reaction to the diseases. The two laboratories served as a backup to each other in the role of virus cleaning and indexing. Apart from short delays in the delivery of the elite clones by some countries, no major challenge was experienced during this step of the process.At each laboratory, the stem cuttings were sprouted and grown in pots under quarantine for about 3 months while being observed for virus disease symptoms. At NRI, the asymptomatic plants were separated from the symptomatic (data not presented), and leaf samples from the former were subjected to virus diagnostics using PCR procedures (Aloyce et al. 2013) for cassava mosaic begomoviruses (CMBs) and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT PCR) procedures (Adams et al. 2013;Tomlinson et al. 2013) for CBSIs. The virus negative plants of each clone were initiated into TC and micro-propagated to raise over 50 plantlets. Meristems were used to initiate TC plants for those clones with only virus positive plants. These were incubated under thermotherapy conditions and left to grow for 8-10 weeks before being reintroduced to the quarantine glasshouse to confirm the absence of the viruses using the diagnostic methods indicated above. At KEPHIS, meristem tips of asymptomatic plants were initiated into TC and later diagnosed for viruses. As at NRI, the virus negative plants were micro-propagated to raise over 50 plantlets. Virus positive plants were incubated in the thermotherapy chamber at 38 °C for 21 days before meristems were chosen for TC initiation. Upon establishment, the plants were tested again for viruses, and the cycle was repeated for the positive plants until negative plants were obtained and micropropagated to produce over 50 plantlets.Fig. 1 A map showing partner countries that exchanged elite cassava germplasm and sites for regional trialsThis step involved five activities: micro-propagation, verification of genotype purity and virus-free status, capacity building, mock shipment and shipment of TC plants to partner countries. a) Micro-propagation: This was done by GTIL a private TC laboratory in Nairobi, Kenya, to increase the number of clean plantlets per clone available to partner countries.From NRI, approximately 75 TC plants per clone were sent to GTIL and micro-propagated (Photo 1a) to produce more than 1500 plantlets per clone, which were sufficient to provide at least 300 plantlets per clone per country.Figure 4 shows the rates of progress of micropropagation at GTIL. While most clones responded positively to the protocols and yielded the required quantities by sub-culturing cycle 5 or 6, others such as Pwani, NASE 1, Tajirika, and Okhumelela were recalcitrant and required media improvement. The recalcitrant clones caused delays and held back the timelines for delivery of the plants to partner countries (Fig. 3) b) Verification of genotype purity and virus status of the clones: It was considered critical for independent parties to ascertain the genotype purity and virus-free status of the clones before shipment to partner countries. About ten sample plants were acclimatized at GTIL (for materials cleaned by NRI) and at KEPHIS from which later samples of different plant parts (leaves, stem and meristem) were taken and tested for CBSIs and CMBs by Mikocheni Agricultural Research Institute (MARI) in collaboration the partners to receive the materials, as well as of identifying possible challenges during shipment. Two cuboid plastic containers (Photo 1a) each with a maximum of 150 plantlets of one clone were sent by courier to Uganda, Tanzania, and Malawi. Permits for both export and import accompanied the shipment as required by regulations. Two challenges were experienced during mock shipment and recommendations were made to GTIL for the actual shipment. Firstly, 150 plantlets per container were overcrowded with intertwined roots that resulted in both root and plant damage during removal from the media. A total of 75 TC plants per container was recommended for the actual shipment. Secondly, all countries reported plant damage resulting from the semi-solid media becoming loose and mixed with plants during shipment. GTIL was asked to use a more solidified medium to ensure that plants would be kept in position during shipment and to improve the placement of the containers in the big boxes.The mock shipment experience also led to GTIL being advised to ensure that consignments were projected to arrive in target countries early in the week for easy clearance and to avoid shipments being held up over weekends. Also, improvements were made to the system used to alert recipient countries about the expected timetable for dispatch of the TC shipments from GTIL and incountry arrival. This enabled national partners to make adequate preparations for receiving the material through liaising with authorities involved in the clearing process. e) Shipment of TC plants: This is the activity that marked the exchange of the germplasm, between partner countries. The first and major shipment was undertaken by GTIL. Using cylindrical or cuboid plastic transparent containers, GTIL planted in the medium a maximum of 75 plantlets per container, labelled them, allowed two weeks for roots and shoots to develop, sealed, packaged, and sent the plantlets to the partner countries. The containers were placed in bigger boxes and surrounded with shockabsorbing materials. The boxes were also marked fragile and an 'up' arrow sign was used to ensure proper handling during transit. The plants were transported by road to Uganda and Tanzania or as cargo with international airlines to Malawi and Mozambique. Kenya, unlike other countries, received hardened plants from GTIL. To facilitate quarantine authority clearance at entry points, all the shipments were accompanied by copies of import permits that were obtained from plant protection offices in respective countries and phytosanitary certificates from KEPHIS. At the point of entry, the consignments were cleared by officials from the national plant protection organizations (NPPOs) of the respective countries and received by the national cassava research teams.The second shipment was made by KEPHIS, where 5 to 10 TC plantlets per clone in single glass test-tubes were shipped to partner countries. The purpose of these plantlets was to be conserved as back-ups for immediate post-flask management needs and also for future clean stock needs.a) Post-flask management: Upon arrival in each country, the TC plantlets were checked for contamination and physical damage, and registered. The plantlets were kept for two to seven days in TC laboratory growth rooms or under normal room temperature conditions to recover from transit stress. They were then carefully separated from the medium, introduced into individual small cups filled with vermiculite or forest soil/sand mixture, and placed in nutrient-enriched water baths. Each potted plant was covered with a transparent polythene bag to create micro-humid conditions. In Tanzania, the potted plants covered with polythene bags were additionally placed in a bigger humidity chamber. After one week, the polythene bags were cut open at one end and fully opened after two weeks (Photo 1b). The tender plants were sprayed with fungicide and insecticide and irrigated with nutrient-enriched water. After a month, the plants were transplanted into bigger polythene bag containers (also used in potting tree and flower seedlings) filled with sterilized soil. By the end of the second month the plants were ready for transplanting into the field for multiplication. Different rates of survival were registered by the different countries (Table 3). Uganda (79.4%) and Mozambique (80.9%) registered the highest survival rates with fewer losses than Malawi, Kenya. and Tanzania.There had been heavy losses in the first batch of delivered plants but survival improved with the second batch. b) Field multiplication: The fields used for multiplication were located in areas with very low CBSD and CMD pressure. Hardened plantlets were established in one multiplication field (Photo 1c) in all countries except Tanzania where two fields were used in different parts of the country. The management practices varied with countries. For example, irrigation was done during periods of drought in Kenya, Tanzania, and Mozambique. In Malawi, the severe cold period between June and October 2014 delayed further establishment of the multiplication field to avoid plant losses to frost. In Uganda, field multiplication was rain fed and no fertilizer application was made. To minimize any virus infection, the multiplication fields were isolated by being at least 200 m from any old cassava crop and continuously rogued. c) Macro-propagation: To mitigate the challenge of plant losses during post-flask management and ensure sufficient numbers of hardened plantlets for field multiplication, two-to three-node cuttings were taken from the few surviving plants and planted for further multiplication. In the screen houses, these were hardened plants between two and three months old and ready for transfer to the field. In the multiplication fields, these were plants at four to six months after establishment. In both cases, the cut plants sprouted with multiple shoots in addition to three or more plantlets from stem cuttings. Through this technique, the countries that suffered early plant deaths during acclimitization were able to increase the number of plants of the affected clones. The technique helped to save time and reduce costs of acquiring and acclimatizing new sets of TC plants from GTIL by the affected countries. It also ensured that there were sufficient stem cuttings of at least 20 elite clones for regional trials to be established by the end of 2015 in all countries. This technique can also be helpful in multiplication of hardened virus-indexed cassava plants under insect-proof screen houses for pre-basic seed production under cassava seed systems (IITA 2014). d) Regional multi-locational trials: The immediate purpose of exchanging the elite germplasm between countries as discussed in this paper was to test and validate the clones' adaptability and tolerance to CBSD and CMD across five partner countries all severely affected by CBSD and CMD. Using stem cuttings obtained from the multiplication field discussed above, field trials were established in a total of 33 sites across the partner countries (Fig. 1). The sites were characterized by varying levels of CBSD and CMD pressure, climatic and soil conditions. With the exception of Kenya, the countries successfully established trials with all the 25 elite clones and standard susceptible checks (Albert, a susceptible check for CBSD and Kibandamendo, a susceptible check for CMD). In Kenya, only 23 clones were established in the trials and four clones (N'ziva, Okhumelela, Shibe, and Albert) were omitted owing to plant losses during the post-flask management stage. Comprehensive data were collected for agronomic traits, viral disease incidence and severity at different stages of crop growth (including harvesting), whitefly abundance, and yield components. The data will be analysed in the near future and are expected to help in understanding the genotype by environment interactions for CBSD/CMD resistance. Also, the data will be helpful in identifying superior clone/varieties and environments for the evaluation of resistance to CBSD/CMD. e) In-vitro conservation: The clean plants received from KEPHIS in all countries were meant to be conserved as in-vitro back-ups to serve both immediate needs to replace plantlets of any clone lost during the acclimatization process and long-term needs for clean stocks for pre-basic seed production systems of identified varieties in each country.Apart from Uganda and Kenya, the countries reported the loss of all or the majority of the clones (Table 4). Erratic power supplies faced by most NARS in TC facilities and the lack of TC reagent supplies were reported as the main causes of plant losses for the clones. Additional investments in tissue culture facilities in the countries where these losses occurred will be required in future in order to allow for long-term TC-based germplasm conservation.There were three major acheivements under the intiative reported here. Firstly, up to 30 clones (25 elite, two standard checks and four national checks) were successfully virus-cleaned and indexed, and 27 clones were exchanged among target countries. The other three were returned to their respective mother countries as national checks. The particularly unique aspect of this initiative was the sourcing and pooling of germplasm from five countries, the cleaning, and returning of the expanded pooled set. Additionally, the germplasm presented a unique opportunity to identify varieties with high levels of resistance to both CBSD and CMD under the diverse range of virus/virus vector/environmental conditions in these five countries of ESA. In addition to offering potential for use as parents to generate superior progeny with a background of high resistance, the clean stocks represented a great for initiating extension programs for the multiplication and dissemination of high quality pre-basic 'seeds'. Hitherto, most of the target countries have had no access to field-based stocks of high quality virus-tested planting material.The second achievement is the strong partnership built between breeders and virologists in national and international institutions (Fig. 2; Photo 1d) that has ensured the successful exchange of elite germplasm. It represents a joint action to reverse the devastating effects of the two deadly viral diseases. The partnership also allowed cross-learning between partners at all levels of the process. It has presented a unique opportunity for breeders and virologists to work together to combat these diseases through elite resistant germplasm and clean seeds. Legg et al. (2014) previously highlighed the importance of concerted multi-partner efforts to tackle the twin threats of CBSD and CMD to Africa's cassava production. The current initiative represented a significant achievement along the road map proposed for the 'War on Cassava Viruses' that was described in this publication. However, a key question is whether the partnership will continue after the project. Partner institutions will need to make concerted efforts to ensure that these linkages are sustained, and furthermore, that the lessons learned from the approach are shared with others who are faced with similar challenges affecting vegetatively propagated crops.The third achievement was the successful implementation of the trials across the countries. Following analysis, the collected data are anticipated to elucidate the magnitude of genotype by environment interactions for CBSD/CMD resistance, superior clones, and environments. Although these trials are still in progress, preliminary results are already helping to guide stakeholders on which varieties are likely to be most appropriate in which agro-ecologies and CBSD/CMD disease pressure conditions within the eastern and southern African region. Moreover, these preliminary data and the germplasm exchange approach described here are currently being used to inform the implementation of new CBSD mitigation programs in Burundi, Rwanda and the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.& Cleaning from virus infection was relatively easy for about 85% of the cassava clones. These were cleaned in the 'first cycle' of the virus indexing program and were thereafter ready for micro-propagation. This success was possibly due to the selection and use of stem cuttings obtained from asymptomatic plants by the breeders. The remaining 15% of the clones took about three cycles, i.e., three treatments of chemotherapy, thermotherapy, and tissue culturing, before becoming clear of viruses. These clones were Tomo, F19-NL, NASE1 and Kibandameno; all were symptomatic after sprouting at NRI/KEPHIS. Only Tomo, a check clone from Mozambique, could not be cleaned at KEPHIS despite several repeated cycles. Starting a virus clean-up process such as this with visually clean plants directly influences how quickly the target clones can be cleaned of viruses. However, specificity in the response of cassava genotypes to the cleaning and indexing protocols has been reported (Sesay et al. 2016).Future initiatives attempting similar work should recognize that a small proportion of plant genotypes are likely to be recalcitrant to virus eradication. & Responses of clones to micro-propagation protocols were varied at GTIL (Fig. 3). Although the majority responded positively to the protocols and yielded the required quantities by sub-culturing cycle 5 or 6, others such as Pwani, NASE1, Tajirika, and Okhumelela were recalcitrant and optimization of the medium was needed. The recalcitrant clones also caused delays and held up the timelines for delivery of the plants to countries (Fig. 2). TC recalcitrant behaviour among clones has previously been reported in cassava (Acedo and Corazon 2008). Further investigation is needed to establish the optimal protocol for micropropagation of most of the genotypes. & Extreme temperatures adversely affected the plants while being acclimatized. For example, extremely cold night temperatures in Nairobi either slowed growth or killed the plants in Kenya. On the other hand, hot screen house conditions scorched some of the plants to death at Kibaha and Maruku in Tanzania. These experiences suggest that temperature conditions are important in selecting a station where acclimatization of cassava plants should be conducted. Specifically, the choice is recommended of shaded cool or fresh environments with no extreme temperatures (FAO 2010). In Tanzania, the extremely hot conditions were overcome by introducing a shade net inside the screen house but this could also be overlaid on top of the white insect-proof net. & Bulk packaging of the TC plantlets (75 per container) at GTIL was cost-effective but presented several challenges. Firstly, the plantlets were exposed to contamination during shipment owing to ineffective sealing of large containers. Secondly, the plantlets were vulnerable to damage during removal for hardening. The roots of the plantlets grow and intertwine into a network, making it difficult to separate them without root or plantlet damage. Thirdly, for some clones (e.g., Tajirika) the plantlets in the middle of the container tended to be slow in developing roots resulting in plantlets with no roots or underdeveloped roots that had a high chance of early death during acclimatization. Single test-tube TC packaging is the commonly used method and is associated with limited contamination and damage during removal. However, testtubes can be expensive and bulky. & It was critical to have skilled and committed personnel to monitor the acclimatizing plants carefully and constantly, closely observing the progress of each plant. Therefore, training and supervision of personnel are vital. Best results were achieved in countries where the monitoring tasks were assigned to one committed technician. & We experienced variation across countries in capacities for in-vitro conservation of elite germplasm. During the course of the initiative, most partner countries except Uganda and Kenya (where plants were kept at KEPHIS) lost more than half of the in-vitro back-up plants from infrastructural difficulties such as the lack of reliable and stable electricity as well as of reagent supplies. Future initiatives should therefore pay particular attention to minimising the likelihood of infrastructural constraints having a negative impact on the work. & The coordination role played by IITA (Fig. 2) contributed greatly to the success of the entire exercise. The project leadership ensured effective communication, and the preparation of the different partners. Prior alerts of shipment schedules and departures to recipient countries were helpful in clearing the materials through plant health inspection offices at entry points and avoiding possible delays, as well as for country teams in making all the needed preparations.This initiative is the first of its kind in successfully facilitating the exchange of a large number of clean virusindexed elite germplasm clones to combat CBSD and CMD. However, the success achieved was the result of extensive preparation of infrastructure and trained personnel to manage the different sub-processes in the framework of an effective partnership. This could have been achieved only within the context of a large project, which in this case was supported through a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Even where such project support may not be available in future years, the approach has provided a valuable model for other national, regional, and international stakeholders in African agricultural development that may have an interest in supporting similar initiatives in future. Although the programme achieved its goals, some important challenges were identified. In particular, it was noted that a small proportion of cassava genotypes were recalcitrant either to virus cleaning or micro-propagation, and these slowed down the overall process. However, more than 80% of the genotypes used responded well to all stages of the process and by the end of the exercise, one of the most extensive cassava germplasm evaluation trials ever undertaken was underway at more than 30 locations in the five target countries of ESA. The trial will allow the region's cassava researchers to assess the performance of this elite set of varieties under a diverse set of agro-ecological conditions, and to characterize varietal responses to the viruses causing CBSD and CMD under each of these conditions. This in itself will be a unique undertaking, and should provide a lasting legacy for cassava development and efforts to combat these diseases in one of the most important cassava-growing regions of Africa. In view of the importance of cassava to Africa's food security given the threats posed by future climate change (Jarvis et al. 2012), this represents a very significant contribution."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0149881767.json b/main/part_2/0149881767.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d249117f4f5589fbc336f3dc388ecd8f90135a80 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0149881767.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"076a1ef33c6671830c077bd5b5409428","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/58cc66bc-c30d-4e51-8d87-b178c9dcf18a/retrieve","id":"391901252"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c7b17ad2-fc5a-4d83-a1d7-76f699683308","content":"CIAT é''S una organi~acjón sin ánjmQ de lucrQ, dedicada al desarrollo agrícola V económico de las tH;traS bajas tropicales. El Gúbtetno de Colombia proporciona su apoyo como país sede del el AT V el terreno en qu.e Se encuentrall localizadas sus principales instalaciones, un\" tinca experimental de 522 hectareas cerca de la (;IU-di1d de Cali. StJ. lIellan a cabo proyectos cooperatrvo$ con el Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario OCA), I nnclpalmente en los Centros Experimentales de Turipaná y Can magua. El el A 1 está 1inanciado por .... mas miembros institucionales del Grupo1/ Su produecllll¡. mundial es de 87 millones de toneladas, aproximadamente -. América \" 2/ Latilla prOduce el 37 por ciento de la producción mtmd1al -.La yuca !le cultiva como producto comerclai pero también como medio de subIllatanela en una buena parte de la ZOD& tropical, especialmente en fincas pequellas. Po-\\ slblemenle la ~or parte de la prOduoeión es destinada al consumo humano. Se oonsume prtnclpaImente en cipo formas: fresca y seca. Su ñpldo deterioro y su bajo valor UlI1tarIo dificultan su \"'1OOso a los grandes centros de acopio e inducen al productor a utlliurla en forma intensiva dentro de la flnoa.La elevada cantidad y excelente calidad de carbohlóratos en la yuca, hacen de esta un importante alimento energético para la alimentación de animales dom6stioos.Una de las formas de Incrementar el uso de la yuca en las fincas puede ser su conversión en carne de cerdo, expecie animal que tiene la caracterfstlca de requerir cantidades apreciables de energía, con relación a las cantidades de protelha en su perfodo de ceba.• Este trabajo fue posible gracias a la gentilesa de los Integrantes del Programa de Porcinos del !.CA, quienes proporcionaron la Información de dos experimentos realisados por ellos y qu8\"a!1'Vieron de baile para éste anAlisla eoon6mioo.Agradezco especialmente la colaboración del Dr. G. GómeB en la parle descriptiva de loe experimentos. asr como a los Dres. P. Pinstrup-Ande..-. J.H. Msner y A. Valdl!s.•• fuvestigador A_lado, Economista, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, CIAT, Apartado Aé.-67-13, Call, Colombia, S.A.!! Gutiérrez, N. y P. PInstrup-Andersen \"La importancia relativa del fríjol, marz, arroB y yuca en la zona tropical\". eIA T, Departamento de ECOnomfll Agrfoola. Call, 1972. p.17,V ldem p.17.l,a producción de cerdos compite con alimentos utilizados en la diete hUlllJl.tlS., especialmente granos de cereales. Por lo tanto, una forma de aumentar la producción de cerdos en las zonas tropicales, serta la intensifiCación del use de prodcctos relativamente abundantes en las regiones agrfcolas marg1nales~ como es la yuca, ya sea en forma fresca o como subproducto (harina).Varios trabajos experimentales sobre el empleo de la yuca en la alimentación de cerdos han sido realizados conjuntamente entre el Instituto Colombteno Agropecuario (ICA) y el Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (ClA '1). Parte de estos resulisdos y una exhanBtlva descripción del valor nutrlcional de la yuca en la a.' imentación de cerdos han sido informados por Maner !I .El objetivo del presente trabajo es examloar la convenienilia de rell:lplazar ma!Z comán por yuca fresca o barina de yuca en la alimentación de cerdos en las etapas de crecimiento y acabado. Para este fin se han utilizado los resultados de dos experimentos con los cuales se han estimado las posibles ganancias monelsrlas bajo diferentes precios rela.tivos de la yuca con respecto al precio del maíz camón.En 108 estadios experimentales que a continuación se describen, se usaron mezclas de rarees de diferentes variedades de yuca, normalmente utilizados para el consumo hu.mAno, que fueron obtenidas de la Estación Experimental del ICA en palm!ra.La yuca fue cosechada dos o tres veces por seIlUlllS con el fin de prevenir el proceso normal de necr\"\" .. miento y fermentación y asr asegurar un alimento aceptable por los cerdos. Luego de cosechada, la yuca fue lavado y picado diariamente. En el caso del neo de harloa de yuca, la yuca fresca, luego de picada fue secado al sol o al horno (aire forzado} a una temperatora de 82\" e por 24 a 36 horas. La yuca seca fue prevtsmente molida antes de incorporarla en las raciones experimentales.En el primer experimento y , 15 cerdo. Duroc, con un peso inictal promedio de sexo y camada. Cada grupo fue mantenido en confinamiento en corrales con piso de concreto y el agua y sl1mento fueron ofrecidos a voluntad en bebedero. y comederos automáticos. Los tratamientos experimentales fueron los slgutentes, 1) Diete control a bue de mafz, torta de soya, torta de s1god:a aumentó el consumo de alimento y se tradujo en prácticamente un 10 por ciento más en las gananclas'de peso, a! compararlas con los grupos correspondientes sin melaza. Los resultados de ente experimento demuestran la factiblblldad de uso de harina de yuca en rempla>:o parcia! o total del mal'2 en dietas balanceadas y su poslbilt6ad de empleo en raciones comerciales.Análisis estadfatlc.Se empleó awUIste de varianza para establecer si hablll diferencia significativa en la respuesta entre los tr_ento. en cade uno de los dos experimentos.En el Experimento 1 se toínó la variable incremento de peso como variable dependiente y como fuente de variación las tres dietas. Se observó que no IOXistfa diferencia este6fstlca significativa en la ganancia de peso entre las tres dietas. En el Experimento n, se plantesron tres modelos para el anállsls de varianza, de acuerdo oon el dlse-Cuadro \\. lnfluencia del ntvel de harina de yuca en el comportamiento de cerdos en crecimiento y acabado !I !I Seis cerdos por tratamiento; duración del experimento, 111 dra.; poso promedio inicia! 18.5 kg; peso promedio final 1 0 •. 8 kg.iIo del experimento y: el primero inCluyó las dietas como la llnic\" fuente de variación. al segundo.., le agregó la variable SlIlW y al tercero se le incluyO en término de Interacción entre sexo y dieta. Se obsertó que sr había difarencla estadística significativa entre s\"\"o y la variable Incremento de peso para las cuatro dietas del experimento;el término 4e Interaccl6n no resultó slgn!flcativo.No debe ol'i'Idarse sin embargo que se trata de dos experimentos en que el m!mero de repetIelonea f'ue probablemente insufloiente, condicionado por las instalaciones y el pre-.supueato 41spomb1e en la época de los experimentos.Au4l1sis EooDómico De ..... de comprobar si exis1fa o no difarencis slgnlflcstiva en tos inCrementos de peso entre loa tratamientos i en ambos experimentos. se procedió a evaluar la eficiencia eoonómlca de cada una de las dietas por medie de un sencillo modelo económinC.Se trató de establecer la ga;oa:DCia monetaria relativa de oada dieta definida como la diferencia entre los tngre_ adiol.ollales (desde la elspa de creobniento) y los costos parciales de cada dieta.El Ingreso adicional ro se detarmiD6 porel aumento de peso, dado el precio del cerdo en la época de venta.(1) 1 ~ (Wf -W ~ Pe en dondo 1 representa Ingreso adioional, W f es peso finsl en kilos, W I es peso Inicial en kilos, y P representa el precio del cerdo por kilos. e En el El\\perlmento l. coD;lO no se encontró diferencia significativa entre la. ganancia. de peso de los tres tratamientos. se optó por tomar un promedio Igual para las tres dietas.La diferencia en costo paroial de alimentos (CV) de las dietas lsoprotéicas alternativas (consel'VaIl:perlmento 1 en el que s610 se empleó yuca fresca, genera la mayor ganancia relativa. Considerando barios de yuca (E>:perlmento II) resulta una relaclOn de precios de 60 per ciento. con una mayor ganancia relativa para el tratamiento nl1mero 8, en el que tampoco se utUlz6 malZ.Para febrero de 1974 las relaciones de precios cambiaron al 30 y 90 por ciesto respectivamente sin cambiar los tratamientos óptimos. Esto es, a la relaciOn de precios .vigentes en agosto de 1973 y febrero de 1974 en el Valle del Cauca, emplear yuca da una ración de menor costo, por unidad de ganancia de peso que el marzo Adems, puede concluirse qu~ a dicha razón de precios, emplear yuca fresca es relativamente más rentable que emplear barios de yuca. Esto varlarfz con la razón de precios.Con el uaO de esta técnica de análisis. el productor puede encontrar las proporciones de mezcla más e;onOmica para una dieta cuande dispena de dos alimentos sustitutos.!I Este resultado es válido bajo las condiciones que existieron al momento de hacer el anillsi •."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0152396820.json b/main/part_2/0152396820.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1eafcdc829513fb7b5703a7d651cc4262c6b0db5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0152396820.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b96dc055e9f8defa6280cb93fa369f14","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/cab50643-ccd7-4b88-931a-15c77e4c1b03/retrieve","id":"972760207"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"407ec921-61f6-4b09-b276-62f10bda2b46","content":"Grasslands are important sources of livestock feed and form a major part of the vegetation cover in Ethiopia. Community grazing land management can contribute to sustainable use of grazing lands, alleviate feed shortage problems and contribute to the integral maintenance of the environment with efficient use and conservation of grassland. However, these communal grasslands suffer from overgrazing, competition, conversion to other land uses (croplands and tree plantations), and lack of responsible bodies, resulting in severe degradation.Through the Environment Flagship of the Livestock CRP, ILRI works to improve community-based natural resource management, particularly focusing on communal grassland management. The work in the Ethiopian highlands started with characterization of communal grasslands to address the exitance of general knowledge gaps around planned grazing, restoration and other management strategies.This report assesses (i) questions of access (who can use highland grasslands?) (ii) the use of highland grasslands and their roles in local livelihoods (iii) grassland management and (v) market linkages and links to animal disease.Though there is variation across communal grasslands, the major livelihood resources are herbaceous plants (grasses, legumes and forbs), stones and sand for house construction and selling, dung for fuel, spice plants for household consumption, clay for pottery, water for livestock and people, salt licks, fuel wood, and food from fruits and leaves.Beekeeping is practiced mostly in Abergele. These resources of communal grasslands could be accessed by all community members (men, women and youth). There was no difference between women and men in accessing and using most of these resources. In a few communal grasslands, pottery is practiced only by women and beekeeping only by men. Stones and sand for construction are mainly used by youths and people with disabilities through cooperatives. In some communal grasslands, special benefit was given for the youth by giving them land for crop production. There was also some youth who have no private land but practiced sheep breeding and fattening (in Menz) using the communal grazing land.All communal grassland resources contribute to the livelihood of farmers who keep livestock for fattening, milk production and general feed for animals. In some communal grasslands, and though not similar across the grasslands, there is income generation from selling resources like dung, stone, honey and some pottery.In almost all communal grasslands, there is moderate market linkage for livestock and livestock products. This could be because of price fluctuation, brokers disturbance of the market between farmers and traders, lack of sustainable demand and market at all time.There was no disease related to communal grasslands, but sometimes from June-November there could be disease outbreak in general. This did not prevent animals from grazing in communal grasslands.In most of the communal grassland, there was no management institution and governance structure that is responsible for communal grassland resources. However, there are a few users of communal grasslands that practice different strategies to protect the land from illegal usage, destruction, privatization and enclosures during rainy seasons. These practices are usually done through informal committees and traditional associations. For most of the communal grasslands, there was no rule/law established for communal grasslands management. From 21 communal grasslands, only two have legal certificate of ownership for the users. Most of the communal grasslands have no management plan and use. The status of productivity in terms of vegetation was low and biophysical degradation was high. As a result, the communal grasslands are dwindling in terms of area and productivity that might result in feed shortages.There could be significant opportunity for improving the management and governance of communal grasslands through adaptation of participatory rangeland management that is being implemented in the lowland pastoral areas of the country, restoration efforts by working with local communities, as well as establishing effective monitoring and evaluation systems so that changes can be better documented.1 IntroductionGrasslands are one of the major vegetation formations in Ethiopia. In the highlands of Ethiopia, community grazing land management can contribute to sustainable use of grazing lands and alleviation of feed shortage problems. Communal grazing lands are important sources of livestock feed (Haileslassie et al. 2012) and contribute to environmental protection through the efficient use and conservation of grassland. However, communal grasslands are suffering from overgrazing, competition, conversion to other land uses (croplands and tree plantations) and lack of responsible bodies, resulting in severe degradation of grazing lands (Yadessa 2015 andTesfaye 2010).There is little documentation about the status, management and governance of communal grasslands in the Ethiopian highlands. Through the Environment Flagship of the Livestock CRP, ILRI works to improve community-based natural resource management, particularly focusing on communal grassland management. The work in the Ethiopian highlands started with characterization of communal grasslands to address the exitance of general knowledge gaps around planned grazing, restoration and other management strategies. Hence, the objective of this report is to highlight the characterization of communal grasslands in terms of access to these resources, importance of the resources, management and governance status and challenges.2 MethodsThe study was conducted in North Shewa zone of Menz and Waghimra zone of Abergele in Amhara region, and Tanqua-Abergele woreda of Tigray region.Menz is found over the Central Highlands (1669-3563 masl) of North Shewa zone of Amhara region, where agriculture is mainly characterized by mixed crop-livestock production systems (Gebre 2009). The mean temperature ranges from 6.7-17oC and mean annual rainfall is 896 mm. Despite enduring efforts, intensive crop production is constrained by frost, poor soil fertility and unreliable rainfall in the higher altitude zones (Gebre 2009). This shaped the degree of dependency on livestock and crop enterprises. In the study areas, farmers are limited to barley and sheep production. Sheep is the major component of the livestock herd composition in Menz Gera and Menz Mama.Tanqua-Abergele is found between 12°-15° N latitude and 36°30'-40°30' E longitude in a tropical, semi-arid climate. Mean annual rainfall is between 488 and 645 mm/year-1 with an average of 562 mm/year-1. Mean minimum temperature ranges from 11-17°C and mean maximum temperature ranges from 26-34°C. The rainy season usually occurs between June and September with a growing period of 60-90 days. Mixed crop-livestock farming is the backbone of livelihoods in the study site. Exclosures range from 6-21%, and communal grazing lands range from 2-18% (Mekuria and Yami 2013).Abergele is one of the woredas in Wag Hemra zone located at 13°20' N' latitude and 38°58' E' longitude with 1150-2100 m.a.s.l altitude. The area's annual rainfall ranges from 250-750 mm. Mixed crop-livestock system is the main source of livelihood in the area.The research unit was \"communal grassland\" 1 and the users 2 who access it. About 21 communal grasslands across the study sites (11 from Menz and 10 from Abergele) were selected with the involvement of agriculture experts from woreda and respective kebeles. This report used data from a combination of field observation and focus group discussion (FGD) and key informant interviews (KII) with farmers (8-11 members from different communities) for each communal grassland selected. Synthesis of report used descriptive analysis of data to present the general information and information on access right, management, legal status and governance of communal grasslands.1. It is the unit of the study where data collection was based. One or two communal grasslands were selected from each kebele based on availability.2. The community member who uses each communal grassland. This may include a village or kebele based on the size of area.3 ResultsMost of the communal grassland resources are herbaceous plants (grasses, legumes and forbs), stones and sand for house construction and selling, dung for fuel, spice plants for household consumption, clay for pottery, water for livestock and people, salt licks, fuel wood, and food from fruits and leaves. The availability of these resources varies across communal grasslands and study sites. The most commonly found resources across the communal grasslands are grasses and stones.The grazing system is similar across all communal grasslands apart from two in Abergele of Tigray region that practice enclosure from July-September. For those not enclosed, grazing takes place by all livestock species (cattle, sheep, goats and equines) throughout the year without any rest, but the intensity of grazing differs across the year. Most of the grasslands are grazed during rainy seasons because productivity of communal grassland increases during this season. Other land uses such as crops and woodlots are protected from interference of livestock. Around all communal grasslands, the important livelihood strategy is both livestock and crop production with varying degrees of importance in different communal grasslands. About 10 FGDs indicated that livestock production ranks first as a source of livelihood and nine FGDs indicated that crop production ranks first. Livestock species found around these communal grasslands are cattle, sheep, goat and equines. Their dominance and importance differ across communal grasslands. Most of the FGD participants in Menz said sheep are the most important livestock in terms of importance but those in Abergele ranked sheep, goats and cattle equally.In most of the communal grasslands, there was access to credit services for the community but not specifically for communal grassland improvement. The community used these credit services to buy inputs like fertilizers and seeds, livestock and for petty trading. There are no organized extension services particularly focusing on communal grassland improvement, except for a few grassland communities that receive advice on grassland management from local agriculture offices.In Menz, respondents estimated that the size of communal grasslands ranges from 2-200 ha and the number of users could be 15-800 households (one village to three kebeles) (Eba and Sircely 2020a). In Abergele, the estimated area covered by communal grasslands ranges from 15-300 ha with 90-500 user households (many villages to a woreda) (Eba and Sircely 2020b). As the area increases the users also increase. As estimated by respondents in Menz, communal grasslands contribute 10-20% of feed resources while crop residues cover 40%. Hay and private grazing take about 38%. In Abergele, the contribution of communal grasslands for feed resources ranges from 17.5-50% next to crop residues. In Abergele, almost all feed resources come from crop residues, communal grasslands and hay making. This indicates that the communal grazing lands are declining whether in terms of productivity and/or size.In most of the communal grasslands in Abergele, respondents indicated that the biophysical status in terms of regeneration, availability and quality of vegetation is decreasing significantly. This could be because of heavy grazing, shortage of rainfall, increasing number of livestock, loss of fertility of soil due to erosion and invasive species that are harming important grasses. As result, there is severe degradation in communal grasslands. Milk yield in these areas decreased significantly, whereas body condition of livestock for meat slightly improved around some communal grasslands (management practices related to feeding improved) and slightly decreased around others (where management practices did not improve). Around all communal grasslands, the number of livestock has increased significantly. Goats (in Abergele) were among livestock species that increased in terms of number (Eba and Sircely 2020b).In all the communal grasslands assessed in Menz, the area under grasslands is decreasing from time to time due to land given to youth for cultivation, planting eucalyptus trees and taken under watershed programs. In very few communal grasslands, the area under grasslands has remained the same within the last ten years although the availability, quality and ability of vegetation to regenerate on communal grassland have decreased significantly. This is because of the continuous growth of livestock population, grazing without rest, lack of appropriate management and monitoring, and stone digging in some communal grasslands. Because of this, most respondents said communal grasslands are in poor condition (Eba and Sircely 2020a).In Menz, respondents said there is moderate erosion in the area although there was severe degradation of pasture quality and productivity. In one communal grassland, a respondent said, '10 years ago, there were only 10 households who had access to the communal grassland; but now there are 21 households for the same communal grassland. This significantly decreases the regeneration of vegetation, and the quantity and quality of vegetation on the communal grassland'. Livestock productivity, like milk yield, has decreased, but condition of livestock, especially sheep, has improved because of improved management practices (fattening practices). Generally, the number of livestock in the area has increased, with sheep (in Menz and almost all communal grasslands that are linked to market access) having the highest number.Access rights and purposes of communal grassland resources All resources of communal grasslands are accessed by all community members equally (men, women and youth). There was no difference between women and men in accessing and using the resources of communal grasslands. Communal grasslands resources are used by the community with number of users ranging from occupants of just one village to three kebeles in Menz, and up to woreda level in Abergele. The main usage of communal grasslands is for grazing. Livestock are kept in the communal grazing areas during the day throughout the year, the grasslands serving as waiting areas. Most of communal grassland are used for grazing, stones and sand for house construction and selling, dung for fuel, spice plants for household consumption, clay for pottery, water for livestock and people, salt licks, fuel wood, and food from fruits and leaves. All communal grasslands are used for livestock production like fattening, milk production, and for ploughing oxen as source of feed (Abergele of Tigray region).Stone and sand extraction on the communal grasslands are done by cooperatives mainly made up of youth and people with disabilities. In some communal grasslands, irrigation benefits were given to youth for crop production within the communal grasslands. In Menz, some youth who have no land are using the communal grasslands for sheep breeding and fattening.In some communal grasslands in Menz, cow dung can be sold near towns in addition to its use as fuel in households.All community members who have interest can collect dung from communal grasslands and sell it in markets. In a few communal grasslands, grasses that are specifically used for thatching houses and making household equipment. Pottery and beekeeping are practiced in some communities.In most of the communal grassland the resources, especially grazing, can be shared with neighboring communities if it's big enough. Where the size of communal grasslands is small and used only within one village, there was no sharing of grazing land.All respondents said they have access to woreda markets, which takes them about 0.2-5 hours of walking to reach, but only some of the communal grasslands in Menz have access to the kebele market. In Abergele, almost all users of communal grasslands don't have access to kebele markets. In almost all communal grasslands, there is moderate market linkage for livestock and livestock product. This could be because of price fluctuation, brokers disturbance of the market between farmers and traders, lack of sustainable demand and market at all times. There was no disease related to communal grasslands, but sometimes from June-November there could be disease outbreak in general at woreda level. This did not prevent animals from grazing in communal grasslands.For most of the communal grasslands, there was no management institution or governance structure responsible for communal grassland resources. However, some communal grasslands are using different strategies to protect the land from illegal usage (Table 1). For example, some communities use \"edir\" 3 for communal grassland management. The community selects two people that are members of their edir to protect the communal grassland from destruction and privatization.The two selected people represent the community to manage the communal grassland. If certain issues are beyond the two persons selected, they bring the matter to the general meeting of the edir for decision.In all communal grasslands, resources were not controlled and there are no formal mechanisms of giving permission for usage of and access to resources. For example, when the government wants to give part of the grassland to youth groups for crop production, the decision is made based on the decision of the majority of users. There is considerable lack of planning and management on communal grassland resources to ensure sustainable use of resources. In some communal grasslands such as in Menz Mama woreda, some conservation activities such as planting trees and watershed management can be seen.There was no rule/law established for management of communal grasslands. Only in one communal grassland on the Tigray side of Abergele, they have a bylaw formed at kebele level with social law affairs which was implemented with the involvement of user groups. This bylaw specifically focused on protecting communal grasslands from livestock during rainy seasons. There is another bylaw at the woreda level specipically targeted at protecting trees (Table 1). In all villages, there are committees who only protect trees on communal grassland and are responsible for issuing penalties. Legal status, existing institutions and governance of communal grasslands and government policies pertaining to their management Almost in all communal grasslands, there was no legal governance and institution for communal grassland management. There are informal institutions established at village levels in some communal grasslands, such as edirs and church committees, to prevent abuse of resources and privatization of grazing land. In one communal grassland in Abergele-Tigray, the users have a bylaw formed at kebele level with social law affairs where the decision-making body (committee) is registered at kebele level. The main function of this committee is to protect grazing land from livestock interference during rainy seasons.During the land redistribution in Amhara in 1997, communal grasslands were left for communal grazing for members of different villages. Some communal grasslands owned by government (woreda/kebele level) are used by the surrounding communities. There were only two certificates of ownership among communities in the study area; one was given by the kebele (Menz Gera) and the other from woreda (Menz Mama). As a result, in Menze Gera, 90% of communal grasslands assessed have no certificate of ownership. The certificate of ownership given by the kebele has the names of two people representing 42 users of the communal grassland in Menze Gera woreda. In case somebody marries in to the users' lineage, they have the right to use the communal grassland. Respondents said that after the community got the certificate, they have developed a sense of ownership and confidence as no one can take away their land and give it to other uses and they can avoid conversion of the grazing land to other land uses. Respondents also said that having certificates also helps to plan on how to use communal grasslands. In one of the kebeles, the respondents refused to participate once we started to discuss about communal grassland. This was because once, the woreda forest enterprise tried to convert the communal grasslands to other land use through a similar discussion. The respondents suspected that this was a similar scenario.Government provides advice on how to use the communal grasslands and that free grazing should be avoided. A kebele leader who participated in the key informant interview said that those who have no certificate of ownership on communal grasslands have no guarantee that the communal grassland won't be used for other purposes by the government, whereas those who have a certificate retain ownership of the communal grassland even if the government imposes new policies.In some communal grasslands, the community asked the kebele to get a certificate of ownership but have not received response. Participants said that lack of ownership is worsening the already poor condition of communal grasslands.In most of the communal grasslands, there was no legal enforcement regarding the management of communal grasslands.There are only mutual understanding among users that the communal grasslands are to be protected from conversion to cultivation land for private ownership. Any member of the user group graze at any time, but no one controls it and no payment is made to use all resources. The users are not allowed to cultivate communal grasslands and if someone violates this rule, they are reported to the kebele land administration and ordered to leave the cultivate land.All respondents of FGDs in this study indicated that communal grasslands can be improved if the community can get support in better management techniques, better planning for resource usage and methods of controlling unwanted weed plants. So far, no interventions have been done to improve the productivity and quality of the pasture in the communal grasslands assessed for the purpose of this study except in a few areas in Tigray where enclosures for three months during rainy seasons have been practiced.The degree and types of challenges vary across communal grasslands. Some of the challenges are high degradation of grazing land, grazing without rest, lack of full ownership on communal grasslands, no rules/law for management of grassland resources, dwindling size of communal grassland area, lack of usage plans, lack of management plans, illegal use of the resources, crop production and tree planting inside communal grasslands and poor land security. All these result in feed shortage.Communal grasslands across the study areas are mainly used for grazing. In some areas, they are used for stone digging to be used for house construction and selling, collection of dung for fuel and marketing, collection of fire wood, drinking water sources for livestock and people, spice plants for household consumption, wild fruit and leaves for human food, and clay for making pottery.All resources are accessed by all community members (men, women, and youth) with no difference between women and men in accessing and using the resources with the exception of beekeeping practiced only by men and pottery practiced only by women. Communal grasslands provide many resources in all of the areas assessed in this study but their use for grazing and stone extraction take the leading place. Most users use communal grasslands for grazing of their livestock that are left wandering most of the time regardless of pasture availability. Respondents indicated that land productivity in terms of vegetation was low and biophysical degradation was high.Most of the communal grasslands have no management and governance system; they are mostly left open for all the local population with livestock to use without resting. A few communal grasslands have established informal committees and traditional associations. Except for these informal structures formed by users, there were no formal institutions of management and governance that have legal status. Unlike individual lands in the area, landholding certificates are not provided for most communal grasslands. From 21 communal grasslands, only two have legal certificates of ownership for the users, resulting in poor security for tenure in most of the communal grasslands. There are efforts underway to include communal grasslands under watershed programs, planting trees and encouraging unemployed youth by giving them land for crop cultivation and mineral extraction. Most of the communal grasslands have no management plan and use. As a result, the communal grasslands are dwindling in terms of area and productivity.There is significant opportunity for improving the management and governance of communal grasslands through adaptation of participatory rangeland management that is being implemented in the lowland pastoral areas of the country, restoration efforts by working with local communities, as well as establishing effective monitoring and evaluation systems so that changes can be better documented."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0153554184.json b/main/part_2/0153554184.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b52d6771c2f4b543c661b6eafa657ecdcf43806 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0153554184.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b60939cd08b884377febb5bb74512723","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/34474f28-074e-4fd2-a17c-d9ee6fecbb34/retrieve","id":"1694953363"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5aa7a778-e1d1-45ce-8250-0392196e3fdb","content":"Outbreaks of Rift Valley fever (RVF) occur periodically in eastern, southern and western Africa with human and animal health burdens and socioeconomic losses. The zoonotic disease is caused by a virus which is transmitted by various species of mosquitoes. The disease mainly affects cattle, sheep, goats, and camels, leading to abortions and mortality in young animals. Humans can be infected if they contact infected tissue or are bitten by infected mosquitoes.Outbreaks occur following periods of above normal and persistent precipitation and flooding which establishes good breeding grounds for mosquitoes.Of all the available control measures, livestock vaccination is considered the most promising for preventing human and livestock RVF cases when used appropriately. There are at least three types of RVF vaccines that are available in the sub-Saharan Africa. Whereas vaccines can be effective in the prevention of RVF, strategies for their deployment have been suboptimal. Veterinary departments, for example, maintain a tight control on the distribution of the vaccines. The private sector often has limited access to these vaccines even in high potential areas where it could support their deployment. More importantly, multiple barriers limit the uptake of the vaccines at the community level. These barriers include cost, access to information on vaccination campaigns, and time/ability to drive animals to vaccination points.The project has three components:• Gender: Testing gender-responsive modifications to an RVF vaccination campaign with the goal of reducing barriers for women who want to vaccinate their livestock.• Nutrition: Predicting the impact of RVF outbreaks on nutrition using dynamic models, to demonstrate potential benefits which an RVF control measures would offer.• Business plan: Capturing costs of vaccination and identifying stakeholders and incentives which could be used in horizontal and vertical scaling.Isiolo County, KenyaIsiolo County Government Department of Veterinary Services, KenyaJanuary 2022 -December 2023 (Phase III)The initial project began in September 2019.$600,000 USDUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID), grant number 720BHA22IO00221.Bernard Bett b.bett@cgiar.org Project PI Zoë Campbell z.campbell@cgiar.org GenderEsther Omosa e.omosa@cgiar.org Nutrition Francis Wanyoike f.wanyoike@cgiar.org Business planPage 1: ILRI/Adan Abdi ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund.The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) is a non-profit institution helping people in low-and middle-income countries to improve their lives, livelihoods and lands through the animals that remain the backbone of small-scale agriculture and enterprise across the developing world. ILRI belongs to CGIAR, a global research-for-development partnership working for a food-secure future. ILRI's funders, through the CGIAR Trust Fund, and its many partners make ILRI's work possible and its mission a reality. Australian animal scientist and Nobel Laureate Peter Doherty serves as ILRI's patron.You are free to use and share this material under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence .better lives through livestock ilri.org"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0167065650.json b/main/part_2/0167065650.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a9636847c24631cfff689e78dcba135e2fc261d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0167065650.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8e1b2751efb72883ef94ec1e1b397d3d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/453d981e-449a-4013-92d2-5e0e3d7948d5/retrieve","id":"-1485540834"},"keywords":["Andes-Amazon foothills","fragmentation","connectivity","fragstats","conefor","SPS Citation: Argote, K.","Rodríguez-Sánchez, B.","Quintero, M.","Francesconi, W. One Tree at a Time: Restoring Landscape Connectivity through Silvopastoral Systems in Transformed Amazon Landscapes"],"sieverID":"d1f10dac-92d0-496a-8c0a-0a6c4b985d89","content":"Due to the continued expansion of pastures and illicit crops, the Andes-Amazon foothills in Colombia are one of most threatened biodiversity hotspots in the country. Halting and restoring the connectivity of the landscapes transformed over the last 40 years and now dominated by extensive cattle ranching practices, represents a challenge. Silvopastoral systems (SPSs) have been proposed as a strategy to help conserve the biodiversity by improving landscape connectivity. However, understanding the contributions of SPSs to biodiversity conservation still requires additional research. At the farm scale (here called farmscape), we compared different landscape fragmentation and connectivity metrics under two SPS conditions (with and without). Overall, the adoption of SPSs increased the probability of connectivity (PC) index in all cases. However, the contributions of SPSs to landscape connectivity were not linear. Greater PC increases were observed in highly degraded farmscapes (ΔPc = 284) compared to farmscapes containing patches that were better connected and had larger habitat areas (ΔPc = 6). These variables could play a fundamental role in enhancing the landscape connectivity through restoration activities that seek to improve biodiversity conservation. Even if they are relatively small and scattered, in highly degraded cattle ranching systems, SPSs could significantly improve the landscape connectivity, which in turn could improve wildlife conservation.Colombia ranks among the top most biodiverse countries in the world [1]. Yet, the country is facing some of the highest losses in humid primary forests (1.69 Mha lost from 2001 to 2020, corresponding to 36% of its total forest cover loss during the same time period) [2]. As a result, we are witnessing the accelerated habitat destruction of a large number of species across taxonomic groups, from reptiles such as the Amazon river turtle (Podocnemis expansa), amphibians such as the golden frog (Phyllobates terribilis), birds such as the harpy eagle (Harpia harpyja), to mammals such as bats (Diphylla ecaudata), the titi monkey (Callicebus caquetensis), the jaguar (Panthera onca) and the spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus), all of which considered critically endangered (CR) by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) [3]. The Andean-Amazon foothills are a transition area between the Eastern Cordillera of the Andes and the Colombian Amazon. The region provides a clear example of how forest fragmentation and deforestation have greatly reduced the flow of organisms and their genes between ecosystems and populations [4]. According to Colombia's national environmental institute IDEAM, 57% of this transitional area has been converted from natural habitats to agriculture [5]. From 2000 and 2017, the average deforestation rate was approx. 63,000 ha/year, and cattle ranching is the preferred (80%) agricultural activity in the region [5]. The loss of natural habitat puts at risk one of the most important ecological corridors in the continent, which connects four national protected areas: Picachos, Tinigua, Sierra de la Macarena, and Chiribiquete.In the midst of the Colombian post-conflict era and during the last 5 years (2017-2022), after the national guerrilla group known as FARC (which in Spanish stands for Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces) left the territory, the situation for Colombia's biodiversity is even more uncertain. The expansion of grasslands for cattle ranching and monoculture agriculture continues to increase at an alarming rate and at the expense of native forests and other species-rich ecosystems [6,7]. The development and implementation of post-conflict economic plans in the region are contributing to increases in deforestation [8]. Many of these plans are based on the exploration and extraction of minerals and hydrocarbons [9,10]. The stable generation of financial resources and income for local communities is also a key objective in the region. While the plans are meant to bring development into what has been an impoverished region, the problem may lay in the poor transition between government administrations, to make these plans sustainable in nature [11]. What's worse, is that new armed groups have emerged and are invading the region. These groups are carrying out illegal activities, such as growing illicit crops, and illegal mining and logging. The complex and multidimensional factors in the Andes-Amazon foothills has and continues to make the implementation of appropriate sustainable development and biodiversity conservation strategies very difficult in the region. Putting forward options for maintaining and improving landscape connectivity is one of the challenges for biodiversity conservation in highly fragmented landscapes [12]. As a main deforestation driver, cattle ranching in the Andes-Amazon foothills is characterized by poor water and soil management, resulting in very low grass productivity (0.62 head ha -1 ) [13]. An attractive alternative would be to work with the local communities to increase their environmental awareness and become land stewards through the adoption of silvopastoral systems (SPSs) [14]. SPSs are multifunctional agroforestry practices that intentionally combine cattle ranching production with grasses, legumes, and trees, to produce fodder and forage, as well as timber and fruits or nuts in some cases [14][15][16]. Hence, compared to conventional pastures dominated by monocultures, SPSs optimize land productivity and contribute to conserving water, soil, and nutrients. SPSs could integrate their components in a mutually beneficial way, by providing nutrient recycling and by enhancing productivity, animal welfare, soil retention, and carbon sequestration, which results in greater income and well-being for farmers. Thus, these systems benefit producers and society as a whole at the local, regional, and global scale [17,18].The above-mentioned benefits of SPSs have been well documented in the literature [18,19]. However, understanding the contributions of SPSs to biodiversity conservation still requires additional research [20,21]. It would be valuable to identify the criteria that could optimize the impacts of SPSs in increasing landscape connectivity for biodiversity conservation. We hypothesize that the contributions of SPSs to structural connectivity vary as a function of fixed-variables (i.e., size, location, shape) that could be manipulated during the design of SPSs. In other words, site-specific planning and implementation of SPSs could potentiate the impact of these to increase the landscape connectivity for conservation purposes. The research intends to better understand the potential conservation benefits of livelihood practices that work in synergy with the interests and preferences of farmers.To address the hypothesis, we conducted a three-level research approach to: (i) understand the deforestation trends in the Colombian Amazon ecoregion during a twenty years period (2001-2021) (1st Level), (ii) estimate the landscape fragmentation changes in the Andean-Amazon foothills of Colombia (2nd Level), and (iii) compare the landscape connectivity and the fragmentation metrics under two SPS conditions (with and without) at the farm scale (3rd Level).The study was carried out in one of the most deforested areas of the Colombian Amazon (1st level), located at the transition between the Eastern Cordillera of the Andes and the Amazon. This area is characterized for its biodiversity and high levels of endemism, as well as by its cultural significance. At the same time, it is one of the most threatened areas due to habitat degradation, loss of biodiversity, disruptions to the water cycle, social pressure on natural resources, and forest fires [22]. The deforestation frontier in this region has been rapidly advancing from the Andes Mountain to the deep Amazon.By 2020, deforestation in this ecoregion has reached 11,519 km 2 [23].Within this area, we selected a 41 x 54 km window (2214 km 2 ) located in the Andean-Amazon foothills to the northwest region of the department of Caquetá, between 1°05' N, 76°02' W and 1°27' N, 75°33' W (2nd level). Finally, we selected 12 analysis sub-windows of 3 x 3 km (9 km 2 ) containing 24 farms where SPSs had been implemented (Figure 1). The selected study area is a predominantly agricultural landscape connected through a network of roads and small urban areas. Within this target region, habitat restoration was proposed through the implementation of the Sustainable Amazon Landscapes (SAL) project, an initiative that engaged and co-designed the restoration of cattle ranching pastures, in partnership with farmers and local environment organizations. The project promoted wildlife conservation through the adoption of silvopastoral systems in combination with the conservation of valuable natural areas such as forests, secondary vegetation, and water bodies within farms. In 2018, SPSs were implemented in a total of 24 farms. Each SPS system was designed according to the type of farm, their natural areas, their water accessibility, their land uses, and production activities, among other variables.As part of the SAL project, not only living fences and scattered paddock trees were established as SPSs, but practices such as: paddock rotation, forage banks, protection of secondary forest areas, and bodies of water to promote natural regeneration, were promoted along with other sustainable practices co-designed between experts and farmers.Two types of silvopastoral systems were established on these 24 farms. One system was the so-called intensive system composed of plots of Brachiaria decumbens in association with Kudzu (Pueraria phaseoloides) mainly, interspersed with strips of timber trees inside and around the edge of the plot, mainly shade trees, such as Chilco (Miconia elata), Madura-plàtano (Jacaranda copaia), Nogal (Cordia alliodora), and shrub species such as the Boton de oro (Tithonia diversifolia). The second system was a simpler SPS, composed of a strip of timber trees, such as Fono (Eschweilera andina), Lacre (Vismia baccifera), Melina (Gmelina arborea) planted at the edge of the plot (living fence) and interspersed strips of Tithonia diversifolia and Brachiaria decumbens. In both cases, the lines of trees were planted at a distance of between 6 m and 8 m (depending on the species or combination of species used) [24]. Native tree seedlings produced by the nursery of the Centro de Investigaciones Amazónicas Macagual at the Universidad de la Amazonia (project implementing partner) were used for planting. The survival rate of the seedlings depended on the species chosen in the design of the silvopastoral system on each farm, but on average, this value ranged between 70 and 80%. Additionally, larger plants (height between 60 cm and 90 cm) were transplanted to increase their probability of survival in the field. The silvopastoral systems on all farms were planted during the same period (between October and December 2018).Our methodology is made up of three types of analysis at three different scales, going from broad to focus (Figure 2):1. The first level analysis provides the contextual information about deforestation trends between 2001 and 2021, using the annual maps of deforestation areas for the entire Colombian Amazon ecoregion.2. The second level analysis corresponds to a temporal analysis of the landscape fragmentation, using the land use/land cover maps (LULC) for 2002 and 2018, generated by the Amazonian Institute of Scientific Research (SINCHI) [25,26].This analysis was carried out on a 2214 km 2 window located in the Colombian Andean-Amazon foothills.3. The third level analysis compares the probability of the landscape connectivity in 2018, under two SPS conditions (with and without the implementation of silvopastoral systems). This analysis was carried out at the farm level (here called farmscape) on 12 sub-windows each of 3 x 3 km. The Colombian Amazon ecoregion covers about 6.8% of the entire Amazon rainforest biome in South America. In Colombia, the ecoregion is located in the southeast of the country, representing 42.3% of the national territory. Yet, only 12% is protected under the country's National Park System, and about 46% of this percentage is designated as indigenous territories [27]. In Colombia, the Amazon ecoregion covers 10 of the 32 departments in the country, including Amazonas, Guaviare, Caquetá, Vaupés, Guainía, and to a lesser extent, Vichada, Meta, Putumayo, Nariño, and Cauca. To gain insights into the deforestation trends in the ecoregion, we used annual deforestation maps produced by the GLAD laboratory [2].Among the GLAD products, annual forest cover loss maps (here called forest cover loss) are generated using a supervised learning algorithm that processes Landsat (TM/ETM+) satellite images at a 30m spatial resolution. The classifications were implemented at per-Landsat pixel level, with a minimum mapping unit equivalent to 0.09 ha. The forest loss is mapped as a single dynamic class using a supervised bagged classification tree algorithm. The training data served as the dependent variable and the 1985-2000-time interval metrics as the independent variable in the tree model. The lab applies the classification trees yielding a map depicting the forest loss between 2001 and 2021. GLAD defines forest loss as the disturbance or complete removal of the tree cover canopy (below 25% tree canopy cover) [2]. This means that any conversion of natural forests, be it plantations, selective logging, or shifting the cultivation practiced by local communities, would be considered forest loss. The model accuracy represented by the commission error (false alerts), ranged from 95.5% ± 1.8 to 97.2% ± 1.7 in primary and secondary forests, and the omission errors (missed alerts), ranged from 82.6% ± 21.5 to 57.5% ± 8.3 in primary and secondary forests [28,29].These data were downloaded for each year between 2001 and 2021, and using QGIS [30], were cut for the Amazon ecoregion. Areas in the raster reported annually as new alerts of primary or secondary forest cover loss, were calculated. Additionally, and in order to improve the accuracy of the model by reducing the number of false deforestation alerts, the official national forest/non-forest 2001 layer for Colombia, generated by IDEAM, was used as a mask. All alerts reported outside of this area were removed.To reduce the heterogeneity within the 2214 km 2 analysis window, the area was subdivided into landscape units. These units shared similar characteristics in: relief, geopedological features, climate, biome, and physiography [31]. This was accomplished using the QGIS software by merging all of these geographic layers into a single layer. The input data were downloaded in vector format scale 1:100,000 from the WFS (Web Feature Service) of the Agustin Codazzi Geographic Institute of Colombia (IGAC) [32].Finally, using the resulting landscape units' polygons, the 2002 and 2018 land cover maps were cut using QGIS in order to create the inputs layers for FRAGSTATS. The fragmentation analysis in FRAGSTATS was run by landscape.Fragmentation metrics At the landscape level, a temporal analysis was conducted in the 2214 km 2 window for the four landscape units identified above. We used the software FRAGSTATS Version 4 [33], to quantify and evaluate the changes in the structural attributes, comparing fragmentation in 2002 vs. 2018. The fragmentation analysis was based on 12 metrics, but only those with the largest changes were reported in the results. The 12 metrics were grouped into the following three different categories, based on the type of information assessed:• Area-shape metrics: total area (TA), mean patch area (Area_MN), largest patch index (LPI), landscape shape index (LSI), mean shape index (shape_MN).Fragmentation metrics: number of patches (NP), patch density (PD), effective mesh size (MESH).Connectivity metrics: landscape division index (DIVISION), splitting index (SPLIT), patch cohesion index (COHESION) and Euclidean Nearest Neighbor Distance (ENN_MN).Generally, forest-non-forest layers are used as input for landscape fragmentation analyses [33]. However, not in this case since we are talking about highly fragmented areas, with a very low percentage of forest and where the dominant land use is pastures. Thus, in these degraded landscapes, not only primary forests could have a high ecological value, but also secondary forests, gallery and riparian forests, secondary vegetation, and established silvopastoral and agroforestry systems. Under this assumption, for the fragmentation and connectivity analyses, the LULC maps by the SINCHI Amazon Research Institute at a 1:100,000 scale [25,26] were used to prioritize not only the forest areas but also the areas that could be used as habitat for wildlife. The available LULC maps of the Colombian Amazon, for the years 2002 and 2018, were also used to compare the landscape's fragmentation changes over the 15-year period. Land covers and land uses that could be used as habitat by native species (defined as \"crucial areas\") were used as foreground, and other land-use types, such as pastures and crops, were assigned as the background. In order to rank the coverages, the concept of naturalness defined by Machado was used. Machado's (2004) naturalness index (NI), was used to define the level of naturalness of the different land cover classes [34]. The NI uses a 0-10 ranking system to define a minimum to a maximum relative degree of naturalness for a particular site (Table 1). In the present study and based on Machado's ranking, land cover/land use patches with a NI equal or greater than 4 (NI ≥ 4), were assumed to provide habitat to native species, hence contributing to their conservation within the landscapes. Cultural assisted system that combine tree growing, forages, and shrubs/trees with the production of livestock. Presence of wild native species and possible extended presence of exotic invader species. Natural elements intermixed with artificial ones, as managed wooded pastures, in patches or corridors.Active management of the water cycle.Highly intervened system: permanent areas with agricultural production. Natural biodiversity is severely reduced; its elements are isolated (intense fragmentation). The third level analyses were carried out at the farmscape level. A total of 12 subwindows (3 x 3 km) were created within the prioritized landscapes (Figure 1C). The subwindows represented real farm and surrounding landscape conditions to carry out the landscape connectivity analysis simulating the implementation of SPSs in 2018. The location of the sub-windows was defined based on the location of the 24 farms where the SPS interventions were carried out through the SAL project initiative. For each of the 24 farms participating in the initiative, the plot areas for the SPSs were planned and mapped in a participatory manner. Basically, the farmers decided where and how to implement the SPS interventions in their farms. The location and extent of the SPS polygons were measured on site with a Geographic Positioning Systems device. Three types of SPSs were adopted by farmers: (i) living fences, (ii) pastures with scattered trees, and (iii) densely planted patches (<0.5 ha) with shrubs and trees with edible foliage to feed cattle, known as forage banks. Among these, only living fence areas and pastures with scattered trees were considered for analysis. Forage banks were not considered due to their small patch size (<0.5 ha).Using Machado's land cover classification, the SPS areas were considered \"managed wooded pastures\" and ranked with a naturalness index of four (NI = 4). As land cover areas with NI ≥ 4 were considered important in providing habitat to wildlife, the SPS areas were added to the 2018 \"crucial habitat\" layer developed in the previous landscape fragmentation analysis (2nd Level). The probability of connectivity (PC) index was estimated using CONEFOR [35] for the \"crucial areas\" layer with and without the SPS polygons in each of the sub-windows. The PC is defined as the probability for two animals located at random in the landscape, to be found in habitat areas that are connected. The PC (1) is measured using the following equation:where, the PC index is the sum of the probability of interconnections (pij) among the number (n) of habitat patches \"i\" through \"j\", and the areas of those patches \"ai\" and \"aj\", over the total landscape area (AL). The total landscape area comprises both habitat and non-habitat patches [36].Following the method described by Saura and Rubio in 2010 [35], the value of each patch in increasing connectivity (i.e., the dPC value) was divided into three components to distinguish habitat availability and connectivity as follows:As illustrated in Equation ( 2), dPCintra represents the surface area of a patch, dPCflux represents the area-weighted dispersal flux between patches, and dPConnector represents the contribution of a patch as a connecting element or a stepping stone which allows to maintain the connectivity between patches [37].The impact of SPSs on landscape connectivity will be specific to the habitat conditions found in each sub-window. To mitigate the variability caused by the unique distribution and the availability of \"crucial areas\", and to simplify the analysis of the potential contributions of SPSs under different farmscape conditions, the 12 sub-windows were grouped based on the results from the PC index and landscape fragmentation metrics. Six variables were used to conduct a K-Means cluster analysis. All analyses were performed using R Statistical Software (v4.1.2) [38]: (i) change in PC (ΔPC): difference in dPC index in each sub-window between the two conditions, with and without SPSs; (ii) change in the number of patches (ΔNP): difference in the NP by sub-window between the two conditions, with and without SPSs; (iii) change in the total habitat area by the sub-window (ΔCA): difference in the valuable area in the sub-windows (crucial areas) between the two conditions); (iv) size of the largest patch (ΔLP) in 2018 with SPSs by the sub-window; (v) change in the average of patch crucial-areas; (vi) Naturalness value by the sub-window in 2018. A silhouette coefficient was calculated to determine the optimal number of clusters. Finally, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted using the sub-window clusters to compare the impacts of SPSs under different landscape conditions.As seen in Figure 3, the deforestation in the Colombian Amazon tripled in the last two decades. In 2001, the annual rate of forest cover loss in the Colombian Amazon was 74,000 ha per year. Despite the fact that a historical low was reached in 2003 with 34,000 ha/year, by 2007 deforestation doubled the 2001 values and quadrupled those in 2003 with 129,000 ha/year. By 2008, forest cover loss decreased and stabilized at an average annual rate lower than 60,000 ha/year. In 2018, Colombia reached a historical high of 250,000 ha of forest cover loss in the Amazonian ecoregion. More recent deforestation values continue to be high, surpassing 180,000 ha/year (data for 2021 is only for the first half of the year). As seen on the map (Figure 4A), four landscapes units were identified: i.Mountain Landscape: corresponds to the highest and most mountainous parts of the Amazon at the foot of the Andean region with slopes of 25-50%. Its forests have ecological and ecosystem characteristics of great importance, presenting high levels of diversity of fauna and flora species. This landscape is dominated by dense highland rainforest, fragmented woods, secondary vegetation, and small agricultural areas. ii.Mountain foot Landscape: represents a transition between the Andes and the Amazon plain, with slightly wavy reliefs and slopes >25%. Loamy-sandy and loamy-clay soils with good drainage and low fertility. Entisols, Inceptisols, and Ultisols dominate. This landscape is dominated by clean pastures and recent oil palm monocultures. iii.Lowland Landscape (lomerio Landscape): have plain to wavy reliefs with slopes of 3-7% and 12-25%, drainage ranges from imperfect to excessive. Soils formed by sedimentary rocks of the tertiary, moderately deep, well drained, clayey texture, low fertility, very acidic, low saturation base, low content of organic matter. Dominance of Oxisols and Ultisols. This landscape is dominated by pastures, mosaics of pastures with agriculture and secondary vegetation. The main economic activity is extensive livestock raising. iv.Floodplain Landscape: are part of the floodplain of rivers that are born in the Andes mountain range. Flat relief, with slopes of 0-3%; they suffer occasional floods every 3 or 7 years. Clay soils with a dominance of Entisols and Inceptisols with poor drainage; superficial and limited by the water-table; fertility is average. This landscape is dominated by pastures and crop-fields. Following the identification of the landscape units, the landcover maps from 2002 and 2018 were cut for each landscape polygon area. A detailed description on the landscape units and land cover/land use areas can be found in Supplementary Materials (Tables S1 and S2).Fragmentation metrics Here we describe the most relevant landscape fragmentation results from the FRAGSTATS temporal analysis, comparing the changes in the structural attributes, between two periods (2002 vs. 2018) in the four defined landscape units. Yet, all results by land-cover and by landscape can be found in Supplemental Materials (Tables S3 and S4):• Area-shape metrics: In the lomerio landscape, the number of patches classified as \"secondary vegetation\" in 2002, increased by 31% compared to 2018. In contrast, the number of patches classified as \"dense highland forests\", decreased by 58%. In mountain landscape, 71% of forest types (\"dense highland forests\", \"fragmented forest\", and \"riparian forest\") reported in 2002, were lost in 2018. With a lower percentage, in the foothill landscape, 35% of all forest types were lost.Fragmentation metrics: The mountain landscape was the most fragmented area during the 15 years of analysis. In this landscape, the Effective MESH Size metric decreased by 48% between 2002 and 2018 in the landcover classified as \"dense highland forest\", and by 99% in the landcover type called \"fragmented forest\". Similarly, in the lomerio landscape, the Effective MESH Size metric decreased by 75% in the landcover classified as \"dense highland forest\". This indicates that the primary forests (\"dense highland forest\") were considerably reduced between 2002 and 2018, both in the mountain landscape and in the lomerio landscape. Two landscapes with completely different dynamics and drivers of change.Connectivity metrics: The Euclidean Nearest Neighbor Distance (ENN_MM) metric increased in several forest covers in all landscapes. For example, in floodplain landscape, this metric increased in the riparian strips by 40% and in the fragmented forest, by 43%.In the same way, in the lomerio landscape, the same metric, increased by 34% in the \"dense floodplain forest\". In the mountain landscape, the ENN_MM metric increased by 46% in the \"dense highland forest\" and by 67% in the \"fragmented forest\". Last, in mountain foothill landscape, the ENN_MM metric increased by 16% in the dense highland forest and by 91% in the fragmented forest.The results show that across landscapes, the degree of isolation (distance between landcover patches within each landscape) has increased in all forest areas. However, the two most fragmented landscapes during the 15-year analysis were the lomerio and the mountain landscape.The results for the CONEFOR-estimated PC index are available in Table 2. The table shows the sum of the PC values for all of the habitat patches in each of the 12 sub-windows (farmscapes).Table 2. Results of the dPC index in the two analyzed conditions (with and without SPSs) by sub-windows of 3 x 3 km grouped by cluster. dPC corresponds to the sum of dPCIntra, dPCflux, and dPCconnector. The other variables in the table correspond to the descriptive variables of the sub-windows such as: CA (the crucial total area in the sub-window), NP (total number of patches in the sub-window, and Shape area (average patch area in the sub-window). As can be seen in the table, in all of the sub-windows, the dPC values increase when including the SPS implementations (with SPSs). This was expected, as the probability of connectivity in the landscape will increase if new habitat patches are introduced. However, according to the results, the specific contributions to the landscape connectivity by SPSs will vary depending on: the number of patches that are introduced, the arrangement of these patches within the landscape, and the habitat amount.Using the selected landscape connectivity (PC Index) and the relevant fragmentation metrics from the previous assessments, the k-means cluster analysis and the silhouette score, identified four groups (Figure S1A). The total variance in the data set was 78.2%, and the within cluster sum squares by cluster, was 0, 6.01, 2.65, and 5.71, for clusters one to four, respectively. Yet, according to the one-way ANOVA analysis, each cluster was significantly different to the others in terms of the six landscape connectivity and fragmentation metrics compared: (1) S1B).Here we describe the observable characteristics for each cluster:• Cluster 1 was composed by only one sub-window (A03) and identified as an outlier.The sub-window has a large patch of secondary vegetation in what would be a pasture dominated matrix. By implementing two SPS patches (of 4 and 5 ha), the PC index increased by 18%.Cluster 2 was composed of four sub-windows (A04, A07, A11, and A12) (Figure 4B). Their average forest habitat with the SPS implementations was 15%. The sub-windows grouped in this cluster are characterized by having a low percentage of crucial areas, but with different values of naturalness (secondary vegetation, fragmented forest with pastures and crops, fragmented forest with secondary vegetation, rivers, dense highland forest, and riparian forest). The average change in the landscape connectivity (PC index) within each sub-window increased by 3%, when comparing before and after the implementation of SPSs.Cluster 3 was composed of three sub-windows (A09, A01, and A10) (Figure 4B) with an average of 22% crucial area habitat without SPS implementations. The farmscape of this cluster are characterized by having a large crucial area patch, with an average size of 44.5 ha and made up of secondary vegetation. In each farmscape, a total of four SPS plots were adopted, each measuring about 4 ha. The change in the landscape connectivity (PC index) with the implementation of the SPS plots was an average increase of 6%.Cluster 4 was composed of four sub-windows (A 02, A05, A06, and A08) (Figure 4B). The amount of crucial area habitat without the SPS implementation was on average 10% per sub-window. This group contains the farmscapes with the least amount of crucial areas. The average change in the landscape connectivity (PC index) within the sub-windows with the implementation of SPSs was an increase of 5%.The four clusters identified, showcase the variability that exists in the landscape in terms of habitat fragmentation and connectivity. Cluster 2 was characterized by an average isolation and an average habitat amount, where the addition of the SPS plots greatly contributed to the landscape connectivity. Cluster 3 was characterized by a low isolation and a high initial habitat amount, i.e., a landscape with a low fragmentation and well-connected remaining patches. In this case the SPS implementations did not have a relevant influence on the connectivity of the landscape, as the landscape was already well connected. In Cluster 4, the landscape was characterized by highly isolated patches and a low amount of habitat.Finally, the change of connectivity (ΔPC) comparing the two conditions (with and without SPSs) varied between clusters. For example, in Clusters 2 and 4, characterized by the establishment of small implementation areas in the sub-window (SPS lots < 5 ha), few new patches (between one to three lots in the whole sub-window), and a distance between the SPS areas and the crucial areas of a maximum of 0.5 km, the increment in the dPCflux and dPCconnect was slightly lower than in cluster 3.In contrast, Cluster 3, where the distance between patches does not exceed 300 m and where the number of large crucial habitat patches doubled (approx. 37.5 ha new areas in each sub-window, with an average SPS plot size of 12 ha), there was a greater increase in the DPCFlux. An increase in DPCFlux means that the flow between the patches improves. Basically, that there are more patches available to contribute to the dispersal of species. Likewise, an increase in the DPCconnector was observed (increases on average 72% in the sub-windows of this cluster), which indicates that these new patches are contributing as new connection areas (stepping stones) in the landscape. According to the results in the sub-windows A09, A01, and A10, the new silvopastoral implementations have the capacity to increase not only the flow but also the strength of the connections between the patches, helping facilitate the dispersal of species.During the last two decades (2001 to 2021), forest areas in the Colombian Andean-Amazon ecoregion have been reduced by more than 60%. This rate of deforestation is alarming as it disrupts the connectivity between two important biomes, the Andes mountain forests and the Amazon basin forests. From the results, it is clear that after the peace agreement was signed between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC) in 2016, deforestation rates increased reaching a historical high of 250,000 ha in 2018. This was likely a consequence of both, (i) the non-implementation of territorial management agreements in the peace agreement by the incoming government (period 2018-2022), and (ii) the illegal occupation of disenfranchised FARC dissidents (non-signatories of the peace agreements), lawless criminal bands and large-scale cattle ranchers with strong political connections, as well as newly engaged coca producers [39]. The observed socio-political restructuring and socio-ecological dynamics in the region have already been reported following the peace agreement signing. [40,41].Habitat loss in the Colombian Amazon ecoregion has been characterized by a reduction and fragmentation of natural areas such as the dense highland forests, the riparian and gallery forests, and the secondary forests and vegetation. As a consequence, landscapes dominated by pastures are evident today. Habitat destruction and fragmentation have driven many animal populations into remnant patches of varying size and isolation. Within this region, the mountain landscape (i.e., the Andes-Amazon corridor) was the most affected by habitat loss and fragmentation. In this landscape, the dense highland forests located in the transition area between the Alto Fragua Indiwasi protected area and the lomerio landscape, have been the most affected by increasing their patch isolation and reducing their patch size. These forests were reduced in terms of total area, patch area, increased perimeter, and porosity. Consequently, it increased the edge effect and reduced the total area available as habitat for wildlife. The combined impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation has severe consequences to wildlife and forest specialist species become more exposed and vulnerable to predation and hunting following habitat fragmentation [42].Moreover, in the lomerio landscape, the loss of crucial areas has led to patches more isolated, smaller in size, with larger perimeter vs. core proportions, and less connected to each other. The lomerio landscape is dominated by highly degraded pastures, yet there are a significant number of secondary vegetation areas in the process of natural regeneration. Some of these secondary vegetation areas are protected by farmers involved in different conservation projects in the region. However, this commitment to conservation is always made voluntarily, and due to various circumstances, especially cultural and economic, farmers end up burning or cutting down these areas of vegetation for the implementation of pastures or crops [43,44]. By demonstrating the benefits of intensification practices in agricultural production and through the diversification of income sources and practices, little by little, or one tree at a time, the benefits of restoration and conservation activities may become more apparent to farmers, in order to reduce additional deforestation and to promote the regeneration of forest areas within productive landscapes.It is clear that the introduction of arboreal areas in a degraded landscape can increase connectivity. Based on different authors [21,22,45], we know that the presence of living fences in pastures and agricultural areas can help reduce soil erosion, provide habitat to a variety of animal groups, and facilitate bird movement across the fragmented landscape, including several forest specialist species, such as the plain-brown woodcreeper (Dendrocincla fuliginosa). However, how other variables, such as the amount of habitat, patch size, distance between patches, or patch quality (its \"naturalness\" as per Machado's ranking [35]), can influence the probability of connectivity of a landscape. Our results provide evidence on how each of these variables influence the landscape connectivity. We found that small implementation areas with a large distance between the patches will lead to a smaller increase in the flow of the system, that is, the capacity for the patches to receive and disperse species. Furthermore, these characteristics will result in patches with less capacity to serve as stepping stones and connect crucial areas in the landscape. By contrast, the implementation of larger patches in the landscape, which are also arranged at shorter distances from the crucial areas, will result in an increase in the flow of the system, and therefore, in a greater probability of connectivity of the landscape.According to Calle, 2020 [14], the implementation of SPSs seems to be most favorable in landscapes with a high degree of fragmentation and a low habitat amount, i.e., landscapes such as the lomerio landscape in Caquetá, where the SPSs were implemented in our research. Our results would agree with this study. However, neither in Calle's investigation nor through this research, was an undegraded control area established. This is one of the limitations of the present study, which could be considered in future studies. In addition, it is important to be clear that this work is a geographical simulation of the potential of SPSs to increase landscape connectivity, but not an actual quantification of the connectivity increases, following the implementation of SPS systems in the degraded landscape. While silvopastoral systems based on the implementation of scattered trees in pasture plots and living fences is far from representing the restoration of a forest ecosystem, the PC index showed encouraging differences when comparing the two conditions simulated in GIS (with and without SPS implementations). This suggest that in cattle ranching landscapes, silvopastoral systems are a promising alternative to gradually introduce ecological restoration activities in regions where farmers have more than 40 years of conventional cattle ranching experience.Land cover conversion from native vegetation to extensive and poorly managed pastures, negatively impacts the structural connectivity of the landscape, leading to ecosystem degradation. Combining cattle ranching and trees in SPSs has shown to be valuable in restoring highly fragmented landscapes. For farmers, these systems provide an opportunity to increase productivity and improve their well-being. This study examined the potential of SPSs to decrease habitat isolation and restore functional connectivity through the evaluation of the state of fragmentation and structural connectivity, before and after their adoption. This assessment was possible due to the availability and accessibility of the geographic data and robust free access software, such as FRAGSTATS, CONEFOR, and QGIS. While the true impact of SPSs on functional connectivity and biodiversity conservation can only be confirmed through field monitoring data, the present study provides spatially explicit insight on the effects of their implementation in improving the structural connectivity of the landscape.Our findings suggest that the contributions of SPSs to landscape connectivity are not linear. There are other variables that must be considered, which could play a fundamental role when planning landscape restoration activities to enhance biodiversity conservation. According to the farmscape characteristics within the SPS implementation sub-windows, some of the main variables to estimate the potential impacts on connectivity include: the amount of initial habitat, the distribution of habitat patches, and the distance between habitat patches. In other words, the strategic adoption and implementation of SPSs could be co-designed to maximize pasture productivity for cattle ranching, while optimizing environmental benefits, such as biodiversity conservation.In conclusion, connectivity and fragmentation assessments could be utilized in decision making and prior to the implementation of conservation actions, to increase benefits. The evaluation approach described here could contribute to evidence-based policy development, by providing information on priority sites to increase connectivity through the implementation of new areas of SPSs or agroforestry systems, that could ultimately lead to faster positive conservation impacts. It is key to engage local communities, and co-design with them conservation agreements to protect natural habitats within their properties and throughout the landscape. As a final recommendation, it is important to align landscape-based initiatives with other existing conservation programs in the region, both from NGOs and from the government, and in the Andes-Amazon ecoregion, those initiatives that will be developed within the framework of the peace agreement implementation.The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d14100846/s1, Table S1: Landscape unit's composition in the 2200 km 2 analysis window; Table S2: Landcover areas by landscape unit in the 2200 km 2 analysis window; Table S3: Area-edge, Subdivision, and Aggregation metric results of FRAGSTATS, by"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0186506349.json b/main/part_2/0186506349.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..681fa12769cbac0cd516105d3e145ac112dd2490 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0186506349.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"70a6a55734a47b782dc98661c0cd68a9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/77a02690-b001-4835-997e-7d8f2b0ee788/retrieve","id":"-1218052998"},"keywords":["household surveys","market data","livestock","Tanzania"],"sieverID":"c0829ac6-c661-4e2e-9f25-25b572b4cfd4","content":"Linking farmers to markets is widely viewed as a milestone towards promoting economic growth and poverty reduction. However, market and institutional imperfections along the supply chain thwart perfect vertical and spatial price transmission and prevent farmers and market actors from getting access to information, identifying business opportunities and allocating their resources efficiently. This acts as a barrier to market-led rural development and poverty reduction. This paper reviews and analyses household information, and the major livestock market and marketing data available in Tanzania, in relation to market-led development possibilities. Household-level data collected by the Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics and market data collected and disseminated by the Livestock Information and Knowledge System of the Tanzania Ministry of Industry and Trade are reviewed and utilised together. Both types of data help identify market opportunities for livestock producers, but only their joint use could provide policy makers with the information needed to design and implement policies that facilitate access to markets for livestock producers. Options to promote integration of household-level data and market data are discussed, which would facilitate the implementation of the Tanzania Statistical Master Plan and contribute to the implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics.Linking farmers to markets is widely viewed as a milestone towards promoting growth of agriculture and poverty reduction in the developing world. The 2008 World Development Report 'Agriculture for Development' identifies 'Enhance smallholder competitiveness and facilitate market entry' and 'Improve market access and establish efficient value chains' as milestones to support an agriculture-for-development agenda (World Bank, 2008). In sub-Saharan Africa, Pillar 2 of the Africa Comprehensive Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP) titles 'Market Access', and most governments in the continent have been developing policies and programmes aimed at linking farmers to domestic, regional and international markets. Any cursory review of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers, Agricultural Development Strategies and CAADP Compacts endorsed by African governments reveals that access to markets and supply chain development are priority areas of interventions.Available agricultural data and statistics, however, are insufficient for governments and private investors in sub-Saharan Africa to design and implement interventions which efficiently and equitably link farmers to agricultural markets: 'Many countries, especially in the developing world, lack the capacity to produce and report even the minimum set of agricultural data necessary to monitor national trends' (World Bank, 2011). Improving the quantity and quality of agricultural data available to decision makers, including both public and private sector actors, is thus a precondition for formulating effective agricultural and rural sector investments, which help farmers tap into market opportunities.There are a variety of initiatives in place which aim at enhancing the quantity and quality of agricultural data, the major one being currently the Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics, endorsed by the UN Statistical Commission in February 2010 (World Bank, 2011). The strategy builds around three pillars: (i) the establishment of a minimum set of core agricultural data that countries should provide to meet current and emerging data needs; (ii) the integration of agriculture into the National Statistical Systems; (iii) governance and statistical capacity building of the National Agricultural Statistical System. This paper focuses on livestock sector data in Tanzania, with the objective to recommend ways to improve systems of livestock data collection and use so as to support the implementation of the Tanzanian Statistical Master Plan and, more in general, that of the Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics. In particular, the paper focuses on issues and challenges related to the joint use of different sources of livestock datawhich falls into the second pillar of the Global Strategy, i.e. integrating agriculture into the National Statistical System. Integrating different sources of data is in fact critical to support the implementation of the Tanzania National Strategy of Growth and Poverty Reduction: there are currently no datasets available that allow, on their own, to design and implement investments that help farmer access profitable markets, a requirement for sustainable growth and poverty reduction.The next section briefly presents prospects for livestock sector growth in Tanzania and related data issues. Section three and four review two major systems of livestock data collection, namely the Tanzania National Panel Survey (TZNPS) administered by the National Bureau of Statistics, and the Livestock Market Information Network and Knowledge System (LINKS) implemented by the Ministry of Industry and Trade. Section five attempts to infer some policy recommendations from the joint use of TZNPS and LINKS data, and then makes some proposals to facilitate the integration of the two data systems. Section six draws some conclusions.The Tanzania Second National Strategy for Growth and the Reduction of Poverty II (NSGRP II or MKUKUTA II in its Kiswahili acronym) 'is a framework to rally national efforts during 2010/11 -2014/15 in accelerating poverty-reducing growth by pursuing pro-poor interventions and addressing implementation bottlenecks' (MFEA, 2010). MKUKUTA II targets agriculture as one of the main sectors to develop to reduce poverty, as the majority of the population live in rural areas where poverty incidence is the highest (39 percent of rural households are estimated to live below the 'basic needs' poverty line, vis-à-vis about 26 percent of urban households). MKUKUTA II aims at increasing the agricultural growth rate from 3 percent in 2009 to 6 percent in 2015 (MFEA, 2010).MKUKUTA II plans to address 'the usual constraints to agriculture and rural development', such as limited access to inputs and extension services by farmers (MFEA, 2010). 'In order to have impact, emphasis needs to be on interventions that address bottlenecks along the value chains of strategic agricultural produceselected crops and livestock' (MFEA, 2010). MKUKUTA II will thus prioritize interventions that relax / remove those constraints which prevent farmers both from being efficient and from accessing lucrative agricultural markets, thereby contributing to a marketdriven and sustainable growth of agriculture.The development of the livestock sector is anticipated to contribute to the objectives of MKUKUTA II as livestock provide livelihood support to a total of 1,75 million households (37%) out of 4,9 million agricultural households (NBS et al., 2010) LSDP involves interventions all along the livestock supply chain, from input supply to husbandry practices to marketing, which only would ensure that livestock keepers be able to produce some surplus meat, milk and eggs to sell in domestic, regional and international markets. However, available data to implement the LSDP are scant at best. A recent review of the status of livestock data conducted by the Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Development reads:'A lot of livestock data are inadequate to varying degrees as they lack consistence through time and between sources; and are not complete as they possess a lot of gaps. In addition, most of the data are unreliable due to lack of culture of data collection and data provision. There is general lack of responsibility of data verification for the purpose of ascertaining their adequacy at all levels. On the other hand, often livestock data are not readily accessible to users for a variety of reasons and available data are not always put to optimal use by data users as they are not made available in a timely manner, are not in the form required and are not disaggregated to appropriate levels' (MLFD 2010).The Tanzanian Statistical Master Plan 2009/10 -2013/14 (TSMP) aims to 'strengthen the NSS [National Statistical System] in Tanzania so as to enable it to produce quality statistics for decision makers in an objective timely and cost effective manner' (NBS, 2010a). It identifies five areas of interventions to improve statistics, including agriculture (and livestock) data. These are: human resource development; development of statistical infrastructure; data development and dissemination; physical infrastructure and equipment development; programme management and coordination. In coordinating the implementation of the Master Plan, the National Bureau of Statistics is expected to ensure that agreed 'statistical standards are used so as to facilitate the integration and comparison of the statistics produced both nationally and internationally' as well as 'to avoid duplication of efforts in the production of statistics' (NBS, 2010a). Comparability and integration of different sources of data is in fact critical to build an efficient agricultural NSS, which is consistent with the Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics that provides guidance to country governments to implement 'a coordinated data collection program to produce timely and accurate data that are coherent and comparable; and a strategy for data dissemination to ensure accessibility' (World Bank, 2011).Integrating different data systems to generate statistics which are comparable requires not only identifying strengths and weaknesses of different data systems and common elements for integration, but also appreciating the value added that combining different data systems can generate, particularly with a focus on the implementation of the poverty reduction strategy papers and major agricultural development programmes and policies. In other words, integration of different data systems should not be pursued for the sake of integration, but on the evidence that the joint use of data from different sources provides better information to decision makers to formulate and implement public and private sector investments. In what follows, two major systems of livestock data collection in Tanzania are described and briefly analysed; opportunities for improved integration are then identified, which is critical for the successful implementation of both MKUKUTA II and the LSDP.Living Standard Measurement Surveys (LSMS) are multi-topic household questionnaires designed to assess household welfare, understand household behaviour and evaluate the effects of various interventions on the livelihood of the population. Accordingly, LSMS surveys collect data from a nationally representative sample of households on their characteristics and many dimensions of their wellbeing, such household size and composition, education and assets, food consumption and health (Grosh and Glewwe, 1995).The Tanzania National Panel Survey (TZNPS) is part of a series of LSMS-type surveys and collects information from a sample of households sufficient to generate statistics which are nationally representative as well as representative at the level of macro-zones, including North, Central, Eastern, South, Southern Highlands, West and Lake. The main objective of the TZNPS is 'to provide high-quality household-level data to the Tanzanian government and other stakeholders for monitoring poverty dynamics, tracking the progress of the National Strategy for Growth and Poverty Reduction, and evaluating the impact of other major, national-level government policy initiatives' (NBS, 2010b).The first wave of the TZNPS was conducted over twelve months from October 2008 to October 2009 by the Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). The survey was implemented by six mobile field teams, each composed of one supervisor, three enumerators, one data entry technician, and one driver. The survey, administered to 3,280 households (2,064 households in rural areas and 1,216 urban areas), consisted of a Household Questionnaire, an Agriculture Questionnaire, and a Community Questionnaire. 1 The Household Questionnaire comprises over 20 sectionse.g. on household education, on food expenditure, on household assets, etc.which allows for the construction of a full consumption-based welfare measure. The Agriculture Questionnaire contains 13 sections relative to household agricultural activities, such as on plots, crops, livestock and access to extension services. The Community Questionnaire includes 9 sections on physical and economic infrastructure and events in the surveyed communities. Respondents of the Household and Agriculture questionnaires are the household members most knowledgeable about each section; respondents of the Community questionnaire are the Village/Block Chairperson, the Village/Ward Executive officer, and several sub-village chair-people (NBS, 2010b).The Agriculture Questionnaire contains 21 questions on livestock on ownership / changes in livestock stock over the past 12 months due to sales/purchases, thefts, diseases and slaughtering. Noteworthy is that information is collected on cattle breeds, differentiating between local/indigenous and improved/exotic breeds. It also includes some basic questions on labour force used for tending livestock, on fodder and on animal diseases / vaccination. A final section is on the production and sale of major livestock products. On the consumption side, the Household Questionnaire contains questions on the consumption of different types of animal source foods.Overall, TZNPS questionnaires contain more (crop and) livestock-related questions in comparison with most LSMS-type questionnaires administered in developing countries.Analysis of the TZNPS data provides critical insights for implementing MKUKUTA II and the Livestock Sector Development Programme (LSDP). TZNPS data are appropriate to characterize rural households, appreciate livestock-livelihood relationship and may also help identify determinants of livestock production and productivity, thereby assisting in the design of investments that promote 'market developments, comparative and competitive advantages and domestic capacity to supply the markets' (MFEA, 2010). Livestock keepers are market-oriented and sell a large part, if not the majority of their livestock / livestock production, which is hard to store. Over a year, households in the bottom quintile sell about 67 percent of their livestock / livestock production, while those in the third and top quintiles sell about 49 and 35 of their livestock / livestock production respectively.  About 58 percent of households sell alive animals, while only about 4 percent slaughtered and sold some livestock during the past 12 months. 7 percent of households sell some milk and 11 percent eggs. Overall, sales of live animals contribute to about two-thirds of livestock derived income.Majority of households, i.e. about 60 percent, market their livestock through traders / intermediaries, but many also sell live animals / livestock products in the marketplace (25%) or to some neighbor (27%). Farmers sell their livestock in local markets and only about 2 percent have travelled to sell their animals in markets in other regions.Beyond insights on ownership, production and commercialization of livestock / livestock products, TZNPS data also provide information on the consumption of animal foods. Table 3 below presents some descriptive statistics on the consumption of livestock products by households in different expenditure quintiles, while table 4 presents estimated income-expenditure elasticities for major animal foods, i.e. the ratio of the percentage change in expenditure on animal food to a percentage change in income.About 59 percent of all households consume some meat, milk or meat (i.e. 41% of them do not eat at all livestock products). This proportion goes up to 68 percent among livestock keeping households, and down to 51 percent among non-livestock keeping households, which is suggestive that livestock ownership could be associated with better nourishment of household members, given the bioavailability of protein, iron and vitamin A in meat, eggs, and milk.With a per capita of 5.3 kg/year beef is the most consumed meat, followed by poultry (3.1 kg/year), eggs (2.3 kg/year) and goat meat (3.1 kg/year). About 11.4 liter/year of milk are consumed by the 'typical' Tanzanian. As expected, households in the bottom quintiles consume less livestock products than those in the upper ones, with the exception of goat meat.Beef is the most purchased meat: 32 percent of households, including in both rural and urban areas, reported to have purchased some beef in the week prior to the interview, a proportion higher than that for all other livestock products. The value of the beef purchased by the typical household (i.e. about TzSh 70,175/year) is between 74 (milk) and 98 percent (goat meat) higher than expenditure for all other livestock products, suggesting the Tanzanians, when it comes to purchasing animal foods, primarily spend their money on beef products.The income-expenditure elasticities are positive for all animal foods but for goat meat, and are particularly elastic for beef. Expenditure for the latter is estimated to increase more than proportionate to a change in income for households in the second, third, fourth and top expenditure quintiles.A cursory look at the TZNPS data suggests that there are both supply and demand opportunities for a development of the livestock sector, which can contribute to economic growth and poverty reduction. On the supply side: (i) majority of rural households keep some livestockprimarily goats, cattle and chicken; (ii) the share of households keeping livestock, the average herd size and contribution of livestock to household income increase with welfare, as measured by expenditure quintiles; (iii) livestock-keeping households are market oriented and primarily market their live animals through traders / intermediaries. On the demand side: (i) beef, poultry, eggs and milk are the most consumed livestock products and their consumption is anticipated to increase with growth in real per capita income; (ii) the demand for beef is expected to grow faster than that for any other animal food; (iii) given that daily per-capita income is lower than US$ 5 for the largest majority of consumers, demand will be largely for relatively low-quality low-processed food items (McDermott et al., 2010). A rapid appraisal conducted by the Tanzania Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries in July 2011 highlights, for instance, that the largest majority of consumers purchase mixed cuts of beef in open-air markets and local butcheries (Pica-Ciamarra et al, 2011).Overall, TZNPS data provide critical insights into prioritizing investments for livestock sector development. However, 'due to the limits of the sample size it is not possible to produce reliable statistics at the regional or district level' (NBS, 2010), which are needed to design and implement investments on the ground. It is thus necessary to complement TZNPS data with other sources of data to fully exploit their potential.The Ministry of Industry and Trade (MIT) of Tanzania is mandated to 'facilitate the development of sustainable industry and trade sectors through creation of enabling environment and provision of improved services ' (www.mit.go.tz). With the aim to 'facilitate the development' of the livestock sector, since 2005 the Ministry of Industry and Trade has been operating, initially with support from USAID, the Livestock Information Network Knowledge System (LINKS), which collects, processes and disseminates livestock market data.In Tanzania there are currently over 400 primary, 12 secondary and 10 border livestock markets for cattle, sheep and goats, but none for pigs and poultry. Primary markets are under the jurisdiction of Local Government Authorities, and their functioning is often limited because of inadequate marketing infrastructure. Secondary and border markets are managed by the Central Government and are bigger and with better facilities than primary markets (MLFD, 2011). Most markets are held once per week while some are held twice per week. LINKS collects information from 53 livestock markets, of which 41 are primary markets and 12 are secondary markets in 18 out of the 21 mainland regions. 4 A so-called 'market-monitor' collects livestock market information on behalf of MIT every market day. S/he collects price information from buyers on concluded transactions for four types of animals, with details on breed, age, gender and grade. Livestock type: cattle, goats, sheep and donkeys.  Breeds: e.g. Ankole, Boran, Danakil, Exotic and other for cattle.  Age group: immature, mature, mixed, young.  Gender: female, male, castrate.  Grade: grade 1 to grade 4.For each type of animal, market monitors (are expected to) collect price information from five different buyers, while they obtain information on the total volume of exchanges from the relevant market authorities. Market monitors are local government officers with no direct reporting responsibilities to MIT. The Ministry of Industry and Trade, however, provides them with a mobile phone and some air-time, which market monitors use to send a coded text message to MIT, with average prices and total volume of exchanges for the various animals. To incentivise the data collection process, all market monitors are invited by MIT once a year to participate in a major meeting to discuss pressing issues / concerns and identify options for improvement.Market monitors send price and volume data to MIT every week. The data are first checked and validated. If inconsistencies are revealed, the relevant market monitor is contacted to ensure validity of the information. 'Weekly Summary Livestock Market Information Reports' for cattle, sheep, goats and donkeys are then prepared and disseminated by MIT, with information on average prices and total volume of exchanges from the different markets in the country. Details are given on breed, age, gender and grade of animals and the reports are released every Friday afternoon. A 'Monthly Livestock Market Information Report' is also released, which presents a comparison with previous-month-price and volume levels.Livestock weekly reports are disseminated through English and Swahili newspapers, such as the Guardian, the Citizen, the Mwananchi and the Majira, either weekly or daily. Data are also disseminated through Radio and TV programmes and market boards in the Community Information Centres. Price and quantity data are publically available through the LINKS website (www.lmlstz.net), with a search query that allows downloading information on selected markets and periods.LINKS dataset provides useful information about market size and trends in prices / volume of exchanges for major live animals, i.e. on trends in business opportunities for livestock keepers. What follows reviews LINKS monthly data available for cattle markets for the period January 2010 to December 2010, as TZNPS data showed that cattle are widely owned by Tanzanian rural households and that beef is the most consumed meat in the country, with its demand anticipated to growth fast in the next coming years.Out of the 53 markets monitored by LINKS, 45 reported market data for cattle during 2010. Cattle markets record an average volume of almost 1,400 heads of cattle purchased/sold per month and a median volume of about 1,125 heads. The biggest markets, with a volume of over 2,000 heads of cattle purchased/sold per month, are located in the northern regions (Arusha, Kagera, Kilimanjaro, Morogoro, Mwanza and Shyinyanga), which record a high density of cattle per sqkm (from about 10 TLU/sqkm in Arusha region to over 55 TLU/sqkm in Mwanza). The only large market outside of the Northern part of the country is Pugu market in Dar es Salaam, the capital city, where per-capita consumption of beef is the highest Tanzania. In 2010, only two breeds of cattle were traded in LINKS markets, including the Tanzanian short-horned Zebu (> 99% of heads sold/purchased) and the Ankole cattle (< 1%). The Tanzania short-horned Zebu is the most common indigenous cattle in the country and comprises a number of strains, such as Iringa Red, Maasai, Mkalama Dun, Singida White, Mbulu, Gogo, Chagga and Pare (Rege and Tawah 1999). Ankole is an indigenous breed largely kept throughout Eastern Africa, including Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. Both Tanzania short-horned Zebu and Ankole cattle are kept as draught ox, dairy and beef cattle, as well as for by-products such as hides and dung for fuel and manure.The Tanzanian grading system for live animals is based on a variety of parameters (e.g. weight, dentition, etc.) and allows differentiating livestock into four uniform groups, from Grade 1 (G1) to Grade 4 (G4). G1 cattle are the best ones, while G4 cattle are the less valuable. mature males of grade G2 and G3 are the most traded animals. Mature males are used for breeding and beef, while mature females mainly for milk and re-production. Trends in volume traded and prices are unclear and LINKS data, at least for 2010, do not provide indications on if/where there are growing market opportunities for cattle keepers.Figure 2 shows average trends in volume (cattle head/month) and prices for G2 and G3 mature male and female cattle in LINKS markets.A quick review of price and volume data for the six markets which have reported data for all months in 2010, as well as for Pugu market in Dar es Salaam (data available from January through October 2010), provides some additional insights. First, there is hardly any correlation between volumes traded and prices of the different cattle in the various markets.Second, in all markets there appears to be more variability (as measured by the coefficient of variation) in the volume of cattle traded than price variability. Third, there is more price variability between markets than within markets. Overall, these findings suggest that markets are largely local, with limited inter-regional trade of live animals, and that cattle are considered more as investment rather than a consumption good by farmers, i.e. market price fro live animals reflects the present value of future monetary and non-monetary income stream that livestock are anticipated generate. A look at LINKS market data for 2010 shows that cattle markets are relatively small and that mature female and mature male cattle of grade G2 and G3 are the most traded animals. The price difference between animals of different grades appears significant, suggesting that investments that help farmers improve the quality of their animals could generate positive returns. As expected, the largest markets are located in the Northern regions and in Dar es Salaam, the capital city. An interesting finding is that trends in price and volume are uncorrelated, at least for 2010, and that there is limited correlation between cattle prices in the different markets. The often high difference in price for the same animals in different markets represents a major business opportunity for livestock keepers as well as for traders. Benefits for cattle keepers can be generated, therefore, if both policies are designed to enhance the grades of the animals farmers sell, as well as to facilitate inter-market trade and trade towards Pugu market in Dar es Salaam (and possibly other major urban centres).Overall, LINKS data provide critical insights into prioritizing investments for livestock sector development in terms of production and consumption areas. However, neither do they help identify bottlenecks along the livestock value chain nor they provide indication on how to design and formulate livestock sector interventions that benefit livestock producers, as they do not convey information on the (dis)incentives that influence cattle keepers' behaviour.Making joint use of TZNPS and LINKS data could assist policy makers in designing better policies which link farmers to markets. In particular, the two datasets may be used to identify bottlenecks and market imperfections along the value chain: they both provide information on price of live animals but at two different points along the value chain, i.e. at the farm gate (TZNPS) and in market places (LINKS). The agriculture questionnaire of the TZNPS contains in fact the following three questions:1. Have you sold any livestock alive in the past 12 months? 2. How many have you sold alive in the past 12 months? 3. What was the total value of the sale? Female mature, G3 Male mature, G2Male mature, G3Table 7 compares TZNPS and LINKS average prices for different types of live animals. Note that in the TZNPS dataset live animals are differentiated by gender and agei.e. mature male cattle (bulls) and mature female cattle (dairy cows)but not by grade. Figure 3 and 4 display LINKS and TZNPS prices for bulls and dairy cows in 14 and 12 regions respectively. LINKS prices are average annual prices of mature male and mature female cattle sold/purchased in the different livestock markets in the region at hand. TZNPS prices are farm-gate prices reported by individual households living in the selected region (TZNPS households are geo-referenced).Prices for live animals at the farm-gate and in the market place appear in most cases significantly different, with market prices being up to 220% higher that the price received by households, with the exception for animals of grade 4. The same trend is evident at the level of regions: for instance, in Arusha region, the average difference between farm-gate and market price for bulls is over TzSh 161,000, i.e. US$ 90; in Shingaya, a major cattle producing region, market prices for dairy cows are, on average, 76% higher than farm-gate prices. Inefficiencies in the market for live animals appear to exist in Tanzania, as the difference between farm-gate price and market pricerecall that data refer to the same animal at different points in the value chainappears particularly high in most regions. This finding is hardly surprising but, since based on two sources of data which are hardly comparable, should be taken with caution. However, if some formal integration were made between LINKS and TZNPS datasets, not only the same conclusion could have policy relevance but additional inferences could be drawn to design interventions that help farmers better tap into livestock market opportunities. Both TZNPS and LINKS data collect price data for live animals, but cattle are differently named or defined in the two datasets. Bulls, cows, steer, heifers, male claves and female calves are found in the TZNPS Agriculture Questionnaire; immature, mature female and male animals of different grades as well as mature castrate and young animals are found in LINKS.A common list of animals is a pre-condition for the joint use of TZNPS and LINKS data.Tanzania is one of the few developing countries where a grading system for live animals exists. The price difference between cattle of different grades is noteworthy, and LINKS data suggests that investments that assist farmers in improving the grade of their animals may generate handsome returns. The TZNPS questionnaires do not include any reference to animal grades: some additional questions on grades would facilitate the joint use of TZNPS and LINKS data.The TZNPS Community Questionnaire includes a question on the existence of a primary livestock market, either in the village or in the vicinity, a question on transport cost to the market and a question on the name of the market. The data released by NBS, however, do not include the name of the market, which makes it impossible to identify households selling in LINKS markets. Ensuring that the information on market name is collected and/or that the released TZNPS data include all information which has been collected would facilitate joint analysis of TZNPS and LINKS data. The same question asked to sellers, including of whether the seller is a trader or a farmer, would help appreciate transport cost for farmers and margins for traders, two pieces of information which are critical to design interventions that facilitate farmer access to markets. This would also facilitate comparison with TZNPS data, which allow identifying farmers selling to traders / intermediaries and those directly selling their live animals in the marketplace.Overall, some relatively small changes in both TZNPS and LINKS may help integrate the two data systems and better identify if and where there are bottlenecks along the livestock value chains which prevent farmers from tapping into lucrative market opportunities. The issue is about the feasibility of the proposed changes.First, TZNPS is a multi-topic survey aimed at measuring welfare / well-being and assessing ex-ante / ex-post selected policy interventions; neither does it have nor it is supposed to have a specific focus on livestock, i.e. additional questions on livestock may generate extra workload on enumerators and analysts which may generate negative externalities on the overall quality of the data. Second, there could be political economy issues in increasing the number of livestock-related questions in the TZNPS questionnaires, as stakeholders from different domains (e.g. gender, environment, etc.) may then ask that questions be added to respond to their specific needs and concerns. Note also that 2010/11 TZNPS agriculture questionnaire was already expanded to include additional questions on livestock, thanks to a partnership between NBS, the Living Standards Measurement -Integrated Surveys on Agriculture Project of the World Bank and the Livestock Data Innovation in Africa Project of the World Bank, the FAO and the International Livestock Research Institute. Third, LINKS' aim is to provide information on market prices and, whilst MIT is committed to improve LINKS, market monitors are local government officers who already find difficulties in regularly reporting to the Ministry of Industry and Trade, i.e. asking them to collect and report additional information maybe unfeasible. Fourth, if LINKS and TZNPS data were made comparable, a question is about who will make joint use of the two databases. Presumably, only if TZNPS data were processed and market indicators generated and uploaded on the LINKS website, which is user-friendly and targets the general public, there could be some chances that regular policy-oriented rather than sporadic research-oriented analysed be done by combining the two datasets.Linking smallholders to markets is widely viewed as a milestone towards promoting economic growth and poverty reduction, but rarely developing country governments have access to reliable data and statistics to design effective investments which promote a market-driven development of the agricultural sector. This paper focused on livestock sector data in Tanzania and reviewed two major systems of livestock data collection, including the Tanzania National Panel Survey (TZNPS) and the Livestock Knowledge and Information System (LINKS): it showed how their integration would be of value for policy makers and recommended some steps towards their integration.Both TZNPS and LINKS data provide critical information on market functioning but, on their own, neither is sufficient to design policies which help smallholder access livestock markets. TZNPS data help appreciate household's behaviour, including production and consumption of livestock products, i.e. to identify investment opportunities for livestock sector development. However, due to the limits of the sample size it is not possible to [use TZNPS data to] produce reliable statistics at the regional or district level' (NBS, 2010b), which are needed to design and implement investments on the ground. It is thus necessary to complement TZNPS data with other sources of data to fully exploit their potential. LINKS collects weekly livestock price and volume data from primary and secondary markets in almost all regions of mainland Tanzania, thereby providing useful information about market size and trends in volume / prices of major live animals, i.e. on trends in business opportunities for livestock keepers. Both TZNPS and LINKS collect information on price of live animals, TZNPS at the farm-gate through interviewing livestock producers and LINKS through interviewing buyers during market days. Ensuring comparability of the price data collected by TZNPS and LINKS would help identify bottlenecks along the supply chain for live animals and draw policy relevant recommendations. This would require some changes in both TZNPS and LINKS, including having a common list of animals, adding some marketrelated questions in the TZNPS questionnaires and ensuring that LINKS collects information from both buyers and sellers of live animals. Political economy issues and resource constraints, however, could make it difficult to implement those recommendations.The major lesson out of this paper, in terms of implementing the second pillar of the Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics, i.e. integrating different data systems, is however the following: joint analysis of existing datasets is critical to understand if and how it makes sense to integrate different data systems. While the basics of data integration are knowne.g. the development of a master sample frame for agriculture as indicated in the Global Strategy -it is the details that matter, and those differ from country to country. Institutional changes to integrate different datasets can be best identified when some analyses are done using different sources of data, with the explicit objective to arrive at some practical recommendations for policy makers and private investors. Given scarce resources, it is in fact critical to prioritize integration of those data systems whose joint use can generate information valuable for decision makers to design investments that contribute to economic growth and accelerated poverty reduction."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0189254028.json b/main/part_2/0189254028.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5099a32942136a4c072363a1a41df6f9af435a51 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0189254028.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"65695621680ac2a8d34a36649cc0afa2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/090ad055-bfaa-4d98-95b2-8bcd375310f0/retrieve","id":"-486157532"},"keywords":["technologies (production","markets","waste) • Capacity sharing (universities","cities","enterprises)"],"sieverID":"35a0f04c-fb27-4454-9adf-6a251ddbf66f","content":"• Interests/incentives of partners can be diverse but need to be 'connectable'• Catalytic role of CGIAR (not doing 'scaling') "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0197870775.json b/main/part_2/0197870775.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00c9af921f3901ad41c7aab5455bb3456bf3b5db --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0197870775.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"16ae886b821f4be7726621ac93d7ca4d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/afdefb6d-73fe-40e7-9ed8-71250309242d/retrieve","id":"-2077341921"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"45d17d9c-972e-4827-8c38-ca238ccdc558","content":"There has been growing concern for policy level initiatives and investment priorities required for scaling climate smart agriculture practices (CSAPs). Over a period of 5 years (2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017), science based evidence has been generated on key scalable climate smart agriculture under the CCAFS flagship project on CSA in collaboration with CRPs on Wheat, Maize, Rice agrifood systems as well as range of partnerships (NARS, NGOs, Private Sector, Farmer organizations etc). CIMMYT-CCAFS in collaboration with number of sub-national, national and international stakeholders informed the key policy planners, Governments and development agencies on these CSAPs through several consultations, communication materials (policy brief, video, research articles etc), organizing several events (field days, travelling seminars, workshops, policy dialogues, training programs etc) and generated awareness among the different stakeholders. These systematic efforts have led to up scaling of CSAPs through their mainstreaming in investment programs to address the issue of natural resource degradation, environmental pollution and climatic risks. This document provides evidence base on policy level engagement process, partnerships and events for outscaling CSAPs by the sub-national governments and other key stakeholders.1. Sharing the evidence base with stakeholders/policy planners:Several stakeholder consultation were organized to inform the policy planners and other stakeholders including Government development departments, private sector organizations, farmer organizations, NGOs etc on CCAFS science based evidence on CSAPs. These consultations/stakeholder engagements led to policy level impacts for mainstreaming CSAPs in sustainable development plans. The key events/consultations organized are listed below-There are workshops organized at multi-level partnerships to generate consensus over the Using the CCAFS science based evidence generated from the Flagship project on CSA/CSVs, several policy briefs, videos, media reports etc (listed below) were developed and shared with key stakeholders specially policy planners, which led to large investments by the national as well as sub-national Government.Agriculture continues to be an engine of inclusive and accelerated economic growth and livelihood opportunities for the millions of smallholder farmers. Agriculture in North-West India (Punjab, Haryana), having made significant strides in food production and contributions in national food pool and Indian economy is now facing enormous challenges. However, the present day agriculture in the food bowl is confronted with daunting problems of hydrological imbalances, soil degradation, labour shortage, inefficient input use, decline in factor productivity, and high production costs, resulting in low returns to farmers. Agriculture has also emerged as a major contributor to air pollution, creating significant health hazards. The adverse effects of climate change and deterioration in quality of resource base (soil, water and biodiversity) as well as environment (especially air and temperature) poses new threats for the long-term sustainability of agriculture. Therefore, despite significant success on all fronts, it is increasingly being realized that the strategies adopted in the past for agricultural growth now need to be adjusted to address the country's emerging development challenges and opportunities in a comprehensive manner.To address some of the critical issues related to climatic risks and agricultural air pollution, the evidence on scalable and sustainable solutions generated by CCAFS and partners have led to a major policy impact and large investments by the Governments.Validating the success of CSAPs farmers were motivated at scale to adopt the technology. Successfully addressing the concerns of the farmers, the evidence base was used to convince policy makers in integrating agricultural development investment in their investment portfolio."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0204206692.json b/main/part_2/0204206692.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a9b17c1655b78bf1e796fbac4da3ece431d6637 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0204206692.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"95cc6336fdc985dd4d89522e11f18efb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/21a84377-a1ba-42f2-bca5-3eb75ca05aaa/retrieve","id":"-194403596"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"87ebaae0-44d0-41f3-b2dc-40232740bbf1","content":"IWMI encourages the use of its material provided that the organization is acknowledged and kept informed in all such instances.Front cover photograph shows two women watering a spinach plot with wastewater in peri-urban Hyderabad, India (photo credit: Priyanie Amerasinghe).The publications in this series cover a wide range of subjects-from computer modeling to experience with water user associations-and vary in content from directly applicable research to more basic studies, on which applied work ultimately depends. Some research reports are narrowly focused, analytical and detailed empirical studies; others are wide-ranging and synthetic overviews of generic problems.Although most of the reports are published by IWMI staff and their collaborators, we welcome contributions from others. Each report is reviewed internally by IWMI staff, and by external reviewers. The reports are published and distributed both in hard copy and electronically (www.iwmi.org) and where possible all data and analyses will be available as separate downloadable files. Reports may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgment.IWMI's mission is to improve the management of land and water resources for food, livelihoods and the environment. In serving this mission, IWMI concentrates on the integration of policies, technologies and management systems to achieve workable solutions to real problems-practical, relevant results in the field of irrigation and water and land resources. Urban wastewater management has become a challenge in India as infrastructural development and regulations have not kept pace with population growth and urbanization. Annually, more and more people are moving into cities, and the figures are expected to reach about 600 million by 2030 making India more peri-urban than rural. Already, there is enormous pressure on planners to provide utility services, and water supply is a priority, especially where peri-urban water is exported formally or informally to fulfill city requirements. At the same time, the urban return flow (wastewater) also increases, which is usually about 70-80% of the water supply. This study attempted to analyze the current status of wastewater generation, its uses and livelihood benefits especially in agriculture, based on national data and case studies from Ahmedabad, New Delhi, Hyderabad, Kanpur and Kolkata.The challenge of the growing Indian economy is that, in many cities, the wastewater generated is a mixture of domestic and industrial wastewater which makes risk mitigation and reuse recommendations a challenge. Lack of systematic data on the different discharges makes it difficult to estimate the volume and quality of wastewater discharged and the total area under (usually informal) wastewater irrigation. Data from more than 900 Class-I cities and Class-II towns (with the population of each over 1 million and between 0.5 and 1 million, respectively) showed that more wastewater gets collected than eventually treated. In general, wastewater generation is around 60-70% over the established treatment capacity which varies from city to city. Governmental efforts to reduce surface water pollution remain jeopardized by the untreated wastewater fraction as well as by India's estimated 160 million latrines and septic tanks which contribute, according to Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), to 80% of the pollution of the national surface waters. The way forward will have to be built on further investments in treatment capacity for septage collected from on-site sanitation units, and in particular for industries to avoid interference in domestic and industrial waste streams. Reuse could offer business opportunities for cost recovery, while in smaller towns options like riverbank filtration, reed bed technologies and phytoremediation should also be explored to turn the waste stream into a resource. From the data set used for this study, it is evident that over 1.1 million ha could be irrigated if rendered safe for use.The major users of wastewater in the study sites include growers of cereal (like rice), horticultural and fodder crops and aquaculture (mostly in East Calcutta Wetlands [ECW] and also in Delhi), and to a lesser extent floriculturists. In Delhi and Kanpur, treated water was issued by farmers for agricultural production. However, with time the quality of wastewater had deteriorated, especially in Kanpur and it was no longer suitable for crop cultivation. In Hyderabad, although the government did not support the use of partially treated wastewater for irrigation, the farmers used it as it was the only source of water downstream of the city. Industrial pollution was highest at Kanpur and Ahmedabad so that both water quality and crop quality were affected at the heavily polluted sites. Data from the selected sites show that the financial benefits associated with wastewater farming were higher than those associated with freshwater-agriculture for cities where domestic wastewater does not mix with industrial sewage. Also, adverse health and environmental impacts were lower in such cities. The highest gains were reported from the ECW, where sewage farming has been practiced for over a century. However, a more holistic analysis which includes all household expenses like health, food, etc., and considers both direct and indirect costs and benefits would be required to calculate the net benefits. Particular attention is required to assess the effects of hazardous contaminants on water, soil and crops. Health risk assessments from most cities showed that wastewater farmers were more vulnerable than others to certain diseases and environmental hazards. However, site-specific health risk assessments are needed to investigate the short-and long-term health impacts of wastewater, so that effective remedial measures could be adopted.Given the increasing peri-urban character of India, this study showed that wastewater management needs much more attention than it has received so far. This is required from the perspectives of both health and water resources management. With nearly 70% of the population projected to live in cities, and water scarcity being reported from many parts of the country, planners need to have a strategy on how best to utilize the various water resources, including untreated, partially treated and fully treated wastewater, for different productive purposes. Monitoring and data collection are increasing in India but they must be carried out in a systematic manner. Institutionalizing the proposed data collection template which links into an extended AQUASTAT database could help collect uniform data sets for strategic planning.I n d i a ' s u r b a n c e n t e r s a r e w i t n e s s i n g unprecedented growth, propelled by new economic reforms. Its population, which is over one billion, is now fast converging on cities in search of opportunities and a new way of life. According to recent projections, India's urban population of 380 million ( 2008) is expected to increase to 590 million by 2030, twice the current population of USA (MGI 2010), with regional cities expanding at a faster rate than the larger cities. Increased migration of people to cities already exerts enormous pressure on city planners, especially for provisioning utility services. Already, many cities can be now considered as 'sponges' absorbing water from peri-urban and rural areas through formal and informal channels (Van Rooijen et al. 2005;Molle and Berkoff 2009;CSE 2012). In general, public services and infrastructural development are not keeping pace with urbanization, and indeed they may become a constraint on economic growth. Feeding the cities will also become a major challenge, where more and more food supplies will have to be brought from distant rural places, increasing costs and food prices (Hanjra and Qureshi 2010). On the other hand, the increasing urban 'return flow' is posing health challenges as well as production opportunities for feeding the cities.Sectoral demands for water are reaching new heights where irrigation, household supply, energy and industry seek increased volumes to meet growing needs. The 2050 projections for India report that it will reqire 1,447 cubic kilometers (km 3 ) of water of which 74% is identified for irrigation, while the rest is for drinking water (7%), industry (4%) energy (9%) and others (6%) (CPCB 2009). However, with rapid urban growth in its 498 Class-I cities and 410 Class-II towns (CoI 2001), the demand for drinking water is also rising and has a high priority, competing with rural water needs, including irrigation. The current water supply to these cities is estimated at about 48,000 million liters per day (mld) and is projected to increase further with the increased demand for different sectors (CPCB 2009). A large number of these growing cities are located in major river basin catchments, taking freshwater away and discharging wastewater back into the catchments and thus polluting irrigation water as well as posing major challenges for urban and rural planners, especially with regard to urban wastewater management. In fact, the density of the emerging cities makes India today more periurban and urban than rural (Figure 1). That the urban return flow is seen not only as a hazard but also as an asset was just recently documented in the struggle between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu for Bangalore's wastewater (Raghunandan 2012).Despite the keen interest of the government, infrastructural development for sewage and wastewater treatment has not kept pace with wastewater generation. As a result, vast amounts of polluted water are being discharged into natural waterways, with poor-quality water and pollutants above the permissible levels being released into 2005). Proactive adaptation to water-quality issues increases the cost of production while suboptimal crop choices reduce benefits of livelihoods to these farmers. With many components of the water cycle being affected for years and the increasing water demand for cities, there is a sense of urgency to explore sustainable water management strategies, while looking into the multiple uses of wastewater and alternative tanks constitute one of the most common forms of urban sanitation facilities in India. The major part of urban India has not been connected to a municipal sewer system which makes people dependent on the conventional individual septic tanks. Access to improved sanitation in urban India has risen but the management of on-site sanitation systems such as septic tanks remains a neglected component of urban sanitation and wastewater management. There are around 100 million septic tanks and 60 million latrines in India (World Bank 2006) without treatment facilities for the generated septage which contributes to 80% of the pollution of the national surface waters (CSE 2011(CSE , 2012)).Based on water pollution, five different classes of water quality have been identified (Table 1). Data show that, from a 45,000 km length of Indian rivers, 6,000 km had a biological oxygen demand (BOD) above 3 milligrams per liter (mg/l), making the water unfit for drinking. Matters relating to sewage treatment as well as the drinking and industrial water supply are dealt with at state level while the municipal authorities of cities are responsible for providing these services. The regulatory standards are overseen by the state pollution control boards, which are linked to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). Currently, only the networked sewage systems are targeted for treatment, while the vast non-point source discharges go undetected and untreated. Therefore, the pollution loads in rivers are highly variable, depending on the season, modulated by rainfall, sewage and solid waste management practices in towns and cities, and types of industry in the proximity. While the regulatory mechanisms have been outlined, uncontrolled industrial discharges contribute to heavy environmental pollution and potential health hazards (Rawat et al. 2009).wastewater treatment technologies (Lorenzen et al. 2010).In many Indian cities, the wastewater discharges comprise domestic and industrial wastewater, and are often mixed and not separately accounted for. Lack of systematic record-keeping of the different discharges makes it difficult to arrive at reasonable estimates of the wastewater discharged and its quality (Heggade 1998;Misra 1998). For the period 1947-1997, a sixfold increase in wastewater generation was recorded in Class-I cities and Class-II towns. Current generation for Class-I cities and Class-II towns is above 38,000 mld, out of which only 35% is treated (CPCB 2009).Conservation, augmentation and recycling of urban water are major foci in India's national water policy. The policy also advocates the reuse of treated sewage in view of the looming waterscarce future. Thus, the policy support for reuse of treated wastewater, primarily from sewage treatment plants (STPs), is inherently embedded in the overall water policy of India, although in practice, multiple factors affect its implementation at state level. The Ganga Action Plan (GAP) was one of the first restoration plans for water bodies, which commenced in 1985 and led to a larger program bringing the entire country under the National River Action Plan. In this program, the identification of pollution sources, interception or diversion and treatment were planned for 157 major cities along the main rivers. However, fast urbanization and industrialization have outpaced the installation of STPs and regulatory processes and, therefore, only marginal improvements are observed.Domestic sewage and industrial waste are the major causes of deterioration of water quality and contamination of lakes, rivers and groundwater aquifers (CPCB 2009). Septic On the reuse side, the primary users of wastewater are smallholder farmers living in cities and peri-urban areas. Generally, they do not seek wastewater but use the water their streams and rivers carry. This can be water with different degrees of pollution, or wastewater of different degrees of dilution or natural cleaning or, raw sewage, especially in the dry season. In many situations wastewater is the only available or reliable water source (Buechler and Mekala 2005;Qadir et al. 2010). While the number of farmers dependent on wastewater is not well documented, more livelihoods are likely sustained through informal than formal wastewater-related activities (Raschid-Sally and Jayakody 2008). An inventory of wastewater-dependent livelihoods is however lacking in order to assess the wastewater-driven economies within India.Against the backdrop of water scarcity and climate change, it is important to examine issues related to wastewater reuse more holistically, and to investigate the challenges and opportunities for its safe and efficient reuse. Many studies within India have documented site-specific contamination pathways and levels, as well as health risks, but they fall short of information on risk reduction and remediation along critical control points.The goal of this study was to assess the scope of wastewater generation and reuse challenges in India. Specifically, the objectives were to provide estimates of wastewater generation and treatment, synthesize existing data on agricultural use of wastewater, and assess the related benefits and economic value, as well as the potentially adverse environmental and humanhealth impacts. The study is based on primary and secondary data. In order to assess the wastewater generation across the country, secondary data were collected from relevant national-, stateand city-level institutions. Qualitative data were also collected from key informants including policymakers and institutional heads, using semi-structured interviews. To look at livelihood benefits and health impacts of wastewater use, five cities were selected as case studies. Availability of research data, infrastructure for wastewater treatment and access of wastewater to communities engaged in wastewater agriculture were the key criteria used for selection of the cities.Based on the above criteria, Ahmedabad (in the Sabarmati River Basin), New Delhi (Yamuna River), Hyderabad (Musi River), Kanpur and Kolkata (both Ganga River) were selected (Table 2). For questionnaire surveys and focus group discussions, households were randomly selected from village communities near wastewatercarrying water bodies covering different castes, landholding statuses (leased or owned), and gender categories, so that different types of responses and perceptions were included. Focus group discussions and participatory rural appraisal methods were used to collect qualitative data and perceptions on livelihoods, health and environmental degradation. Data were collected on family size, literacy levels, wastewater irrigated crops and cropping patterns, input use, cost of production, crop productivity, irrigation practices, livestock holdings, health problems, extent of wastewater use and treatment, livelihoods supported, and economic aspects associated with the use of wastewater in livelihoods. Data were also collected on surface water/groundwater irrigated crop production within the vicinity, which served as a counterfactual for comparison. Laboratory studies on water quality, and secondary data from the case study sites were also used for comparison. The data collected were used for assessment of current wastewater generation and treatment, livelihoods, health impacts and costbenefit analysis of agricultural production. Wastewater generation across selected Class-I cities (n=498) and Class-II towns (n=410) has been assessed by institutions involved in water supply and sewage treatment (municipal corporations, state water boards, municipalities, public health engineering department, pollution control boards and other concerned agencies) (CPCB 2009).Estimates show that about 80% of water supplied is returned as wastewater, without accounting for losses due to evaporation, percolation, and groundwater recharge, i.e., the actually available volumes will differ (CPCB 2009). The results show that, with the expansion of cities over time, wastewater generation has correspondingly increased while investments in treatment capacities have varied significantly. Although several cities could show an increase in treatment capacity, the majority struggled to keep pace with urban growth as data from more than 900 Class-I cities and Class-II towns showed (Bhardwaj 2005;CPCB 2009). In 2007, total urban wastewater generation was around 38,000 mld which was three times the existing treatment capacity of about 12,000 mld (CPCB 2009). However, the survey also revealed that nearly 39% of the treatment systems were not performing to their capacity due to lack of connectivity to the sewage network systems, and/ or other priorities and availability of funds of the respective municipalities. Figure 2 shows not only the share of collected wastewater across the 100 largest cities which varies from nearly 0 to 100%, but also the gap between collection and treatment. To meet the 2050 projected wastewater generation estimates of 122,000 mld for the country (Bhardwaj 2005) its strategies for wastewater treatment will need to have clear goals and investment plans in the years to come.Three interrelated water acts address issues of pollution of water bodies in the country, and include the Water Act, 1974 (Prevention and Control of Pollution), the Water Cess Act, 1977 (Prevention and Control of Pollution) and the Environment Act, 1986 (Protection). According to the law, pollution of water bodies is prohibited; however, enforcement of regulatory measures and infrastructural capability of the government as well as of the private sector (especially the small industries) fall short of achieving the desired standards. The CPCB sets the discharge standards which are expressed as effluent discharge concentrations with parameters set as minimum acceptable standards for selected parameters such as BOD (3 mg/l), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (250 mg/l) and Total Suspended Solids (100 mg/l). As part of their environment planning action for the country, the CPCB has also prepared a district-wise zoning atlas (spatial environmental planning) depicting industrial areas and industries, and environmentally sensitive areas (http://www.cpcb. nic.in/, accessed on January 24, 2013).The river conservation plans fall under the jurisdiction of the National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD), which is under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. It is responsible for coordinating several river conservation plans. Its main mission is to set up sewage management and treatment facilities for mitigation of pollution (domestic and industrial) through setting up of Individual or Common Effluent Treatment Plants. The GAP was one of the first activities commissioned by the directorate to address the pollution issues linked to major cities in the Ganga Basin. However, only 65% of the targeted wastewater volume was treated, and diverse issues prevented reaching the ultimate target set out by the GAP. These experiences led to the formation of the NRCD expanding the pollution abatement activities to a number of states.Monitoring of water quality is carried out at three levels as part of the Global Environment Monitoring System, Monitoring of Indian National Aquatic Resources System and Yamuna Action Plan. Twenty eight parameters are being tested including trace metals and 22 pesticides. Currently, 1,019 river sampling stations are monitored regularly including 592 rivers and 321 wells, as well as lakes, drains, tanks and creeks. In the latest assessment, the highest BOD levels were recorded as 714 mg/ml, in the Sabarmati River in Gujarat (Table 3). Three states, namely Gujarat, Punjab and Andhra Pradesh had some of the most polluted rivers. Overall, 64% of the 1,019 control points indicated BOD levels less than 3 mg/l, 18% between 3 and 6 mg/ml and 18% over 6 mg/ml. Fecal coliform concentrations in 21% of the stations exceeded 5,000 MPN/100 ml, and 53% showed levels less than 500 MPN/100 ml. Fecal coliform concentrations were highest in certain stretches of the Yamuna River (MPN 5.2 x 106 to 3.7 x 106). The STP discharge standards for fecal coliform (MPN/100 ml) are 500 desirable and 2,500 maximum permissible, and for BOD 3 mg/l or less (CPCB 2008), a value not met in any of the river sampling points listed in Table 3.While concerted efforts are made to monitor the water quality of large surface water bodies and groundwater, with the involvement of many ministries and institutions at state level, water quality in man-made stormwater canals and drains is not measured. The water from these drains is used for urban and peri-urban agriculture, as well as for other activities in many cities and, therefore, monitoring all types of water sources would help plan for reductions in pollution loads reaching the open waterways.Activities related to abatement of water pollution range from simple sedimentation to more capital-intensive STPs, most of which utilize conventional technologies with activated sludge processes (ASP) and the Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket being common technologies (CPCB 2009). The systems are often not operating to their full capacity and treatment is hampered due to various reasons, such as lack of trained staff and inadequate supply of spare parts. There is a growing interest in adopting new technologies for water recycling within cities among which are bank filtration (Lorenzen et al. 2010), reed beds, natural wetlands, constructed wetlands (Mittal et al. 2006) and soil aquifer treatment systems (Kumar 2009). Successful natural treatment systems are exemplified by the ECW, which have been in existence for hundreds of years, natural treatment ponds with aquatic plants in Pune, and numerous constructed wetlands in other cities of India (CPCB 2002).The value of wastewater can be expressed in many ways. Wastewater is a reliable water supply for crop production (cereals and vegetables) where freshwater is scarce; high nutrient content helps reduce input costs; it provides an ideal medium, e.g., for aquaculture, and can replenish groundwater reserves. Where trees or fodder are produced, land application provides at least a lowcost, but productive, way for sanitary disposal of municipal waste. Use of wastewater for irrigation and aquaculture is a common practice in India, but Valuing Wastewater Use in Agriculture is usually part of the informal sector which does not receive much recognition from the government (Buechler et al. 2002;Buechler and Mekala 2005).Assessing the economic value of sewage farming is facing many challenges (e.g., where does diluted wastewater end and polluted freshwater start?) affecting estimated areas under irrigation and related indicators (Weldesilassie et al. 2011).With increasing urban water demands, and realization that wastewater irrigation is a common reality, the economic value of municipal wastewater is being gradually recognized. In addition, Water Boards of different municipalities started exploring the possibility of revenue generation from the by-products of wastewater treatment (CPCB 2007;WABAG 2012). In an assessment done by CPCB, for coastal Class-I cities and Class-II towns, the annual value of the N, P and K loads from a total of about 5,000 mld of wastewater was estimated at INR 1,091 million (wastewater, INR 76 million; nutrients, INR 1,015 million) (CPCB 2009), not counting the environmental damage it is causing. This computation is of course theoretical but sets an important signal towards resource recovery and environmental conservation.With the available data for Class-I cities and Class-II towns and other studies, we attempted to estimate the area irrigable with wastewater, which can be used for farming directly from treatment plants or indirectly (wastewater discharged to rivers). When water channels were directly used for irrigation, accounting for the irrigated areas with wastewater (treated and untreated) was possible. However, when large volumes of surface water (rivers and ponds) containing wastewater were channeled and lifted for irrigation, calculating the wastewater irrigable land became more complicated, challenging also any related economic assessment. Some assumptions made in arriving at the estimates were soil types, wastewater ratio and application rate per hectare. Crop varieties were not considered due to limitations on data availability. For direct use, it was assumed that the wastewater was partially treated, and the volumes were calculated using the design capacity of the sewage channel or treatment plant. For indirect use, wastewater applied was calculated as a percentage of the water supply to the city (following Van Rooijen et al. 2005). The estimates of wastewater-irrigated area for direct use were about 6 hectares (ha) per mld, and for indirect use 39 ha per mld. The area under indirect use accounts for mixing with non-wastewater sources of irrigation. Using these volume-area relationships, the data for Class-I cities and Class-II towns indicate that the potential irrigable land can be estimated to be around 1.1 million hectares (Mha) (Table 4).A more detailed analysis for all India and beyond is currently underway by IWMI using remote sensing (RS) and hydrological modeling. It will extend the FAO AQUASTAT database which distinguishes between treated and untreated wastewater use but, so far, considers only the direct use of collected and treated wastewater. It is suggested to build any data collection on the larger AQUASTAT data format (treated and untreated wastewater) to develop strategies for its treatment and/or appropriate use, especially for agriculture.The format proposes a participatory method of data collection to the extent possible, so that the same terminology is used across institutions, and country and all input sources are integrated into the calculation and data management process.The upper part of the FAO template (Figure 3, wastewater production) could be expanded, as shown in Figure 4, to take into account the different sources of water supply for the cities, and it attempts to record the different streams of water inputs that eventually contribute to the total wastewater volume generated in a city. Together with the FAO framework, it can cover the different treatment options the cities might have, and attempt to assess the quantities discharged into the ecosystem. Water quality assessments and treatment capabilities, coupled with studies on Geographic Information Systems (GIS) (Box 1) can support an assessment, which can provide a better understanding of the potential uses and area under wastewater irrigation. Variable not present in the AQUASTAT database but information, if available, included in the metadata. Variable not present in the AQUASTAT database but information, if available, included in the metadata. GIS-based irrigated area mapping was carried out in selected sites in Hyderabad, India, and Faisalabad, Pakistan, to assess the extent and the different sources of irrigation. The study investigated the health and food safety issues from rapidly expanding wastewater irrigation in these two locations. GIS layers of soil quality, irrigation water typology, land use patterns, water quality, prevalence of infections, and other demographic information produced a rich contextual visualization of agronomic, health, environmental and economic implications related to wastewater use in the area. While all of these individual data sets could be analyzed in their own right, additional layers of information helped link the different components of the study, bringing together different stakeholders to discuss a common issue. The example of a GIS map given in Figure 5, shows the sources and the extent of water used for irrigation in two zones (peri-urban and rural) along the banks of the Musi River, Hyderabad India. Such maps can be overlaid with other indicators like soil and water quality or disease incidence to visualize their spatial distributions and possible associations with wastewater irrigation.In particular, data on crops grown during the year in different plots, crop yield, input use including wastewater, input costs, labor days, outputs, markets and prices, etc., as well as disease incidence and treatment cost and preventive expenditure can be overlaid to estimate the economic value of water for each crop and use.Source: Philipp Weckenbrock and Axel Drescher, University of Freiburg, Germany.T h e u r b a n w a s t e w a t e r c h a l l e n g e s w e r e investigated looking at the water supply to selected cities, wastewater generation, sanitation c o v e r a g e , s e w a g e t r e a t m e n t s c e n a r i o s , wastewater use, water quality and perceived health impacts. Secondary and primary data together with livelihood analyses of 289, 80, 50, 193 and 432 farmers from Ahmedabad, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kanpur and Kolkata, respectively, formed the basis for the analyses. These cities were considered as a representative cross section of the country.Current wastewater generation figures are an estimation based on the water supply to the cities. In all five cities the drinking water supply was met by surface water and groundwater sources in different proportions, with surface water being the primary source (Table 5). The data have to be used with caution as there are indications of much greater groundwater exploitation within cities, but without data to support these indications. City water supplies have increased over the years as demand has grown and water is lifted from more distant sources with the consequent estimated wastewater generation. Percentage treatment capacities varied widely between the cities, and the current treatment capacities have been increased in keeping with the increase in water supply in cities like Hyderabad (Van Rooijen et al. 2010). However, the waterways are still polluted, due to sewers ending in streams, indiscriminate disposal of non-networked wastewater drainage and industrial discharges, and also because a new treatment capacity does not imply households are already connected.Wastewater treatment has improved in some cities like Hyderabad and Ahmedabad, but has fallen far behind the requirements in cities like Kanpur and Kolkata, which is not surprising given the rates of urbanization and decadal population growth in the cities and government development plans (Table 6). It should be noted, however, that the figures in Table 6 are continuously changing, linked to population growth, reporting and infrastructural development. Thus wastewater generation and treatment values given in different publications of the CPCB often do not match. An example is Hyderabad where about 585 mld of wastewater were generated in 2008. This exceeds the current treatment capacity by far, but with new treatment plants getting commissioned the capacity will soon be at the same level. However, this will again not be enough to catch up with the increased population at that time (Van Rooijen et al. 2010). Ahmedabad has today four STPs with a capacity to treat 633 mld, sufficient to cater to all wastewater, but infrastructural development lags behind and the plants run below capacity. Under the GAP three treatment plants were set up in Kanpur; however, even the treated water is reported not to reach the basic standards of irrigation water quality as defined by FAO (Pescod 1992). In short, it is very difficult to get reliable data, and even if there are data, they might not tell what is really on the ground.Irrigation with wastewater was practiced in all five cities, but varied in terms of area, types of crops, and the quality of water used (Table 7). The major users of wastewater in the study sites were farmers growing cereals (rice), horticultural and fodder crops, aquacultural businesses (mostly in the ECW and Delhi), and to a lesser extent floriculturists. In Delhi and Kanpur, wastewater irrigation was supported by the municipalities where treated effluent was discharged into specified locations for a fee, so that the farmers could cultivate crops. In Delhi, 22 major drains and STPs (Keshopur and Okhla) provide partially treated and untreated wastewater for agriculture, and the survey revealed that 71% of market produce in Keshopur and Okhla areas was met by the crops grown in these two sites. In contrast, in Hyderabad, only 1-2% of the wastewater-grown vegetables contributed to the market, and the municipality discouraged using wastewater for agriculture (IWMI 2008;Amerasinghe et al. 2009). Over time, the farmers have observed that the quality of wastewater has deteriorated due to the mixing of domestic and industrial wastewater, and many downstream users complain that vast areas of agricultural land that previously received clean river water are now irrigated with increasingly saline water. Since there is no alternative source of water, users have adapted themselves to the situation (by changing the crops) and have continued to use the water available, irrespective of its quality. Low-cost technologies like riverbank filtration are also being tested for their relative merits (Lorenzen et al. 2010), and their wider use can be expected in the future.In general, community reflections on the past and present uses of wastewater, and the related advantages and disadvantages were similar to those stated by wastewater farmers of many other countries, but the responses were mixed for the same location, reflecting the individual experiences (Table 8). The most common response was that wastewater provides a reliable water supply, despite concerns of water quality. In Ahmedabad and Delhi, for some, the high nutrient content boosted vegetable production (Table 9), but for others the soil fertility had declined and impacted agricultural productivity. The latter attributed it to poor water quality affecting the soils. Some used less fertilizer, and felt that it was profitable, while those who received treated wastewater noted that the soil quality is being restored gradually and the income generated was significant (Table 10). Livestock-rearing was a popular livelihood activity in the study villages, but some reported that the health of livestock was affected due to wastewater consumption. In Kanpur, income was higher among the farmers using wastewater than those who used groundwater for fodder (Table 11). In the same city, staple crops like paddy and wheat appeared to have had a better profit margin than fodder or floriculture (roses), when wastewater was used for irrigation (Table 12). In Hyderabad, over 13 types of vegetable crops were grown with wastewater to supplement the household income, especially by women farmers living in the peri-urban regions (Jacobi et al. 2009). However, the landscapes were changing with vegetable farms being gradually pushed further afield, to accommodate the new city limits. The pattern these data show is that there is no clear-cut answer for how far and where the use of wastewater (or highly polluted stream water) is perceived as an advantage or disadvantage. There is a high degree of variability between soil and crop responses and water quality (Weldesilassie et al. 2011).The ECW ecosystem is a well-known example where wastewater is made an asset. These ecosystems support four principal r e s o u r c e -r e c o v e r y a n d r e u s e p r a c t i c e s namely, vegetable farms (using urban waste), wastewater-fed fishponds, paddy fields using fishpond effluent, and sewage-fed brackish water aquaculture. The wetlands cover an area of around 12,742 ha (water bodies: 4,728 ha; degraded water bodies: 1,124 ha; agricultural area: 4,960 ha; (urban waste) farming: 603 ha; and settlements: 1,327 ha) where up to 1,300 mld of wastewater are absorbed (IWMED 2004). The total area of sewage-fed fisheries is around 3,900 ha, with around 308 ha of fisheries managed by private concerns (93%), cooperatives (6%) and the State Government (less than 1%) (IWMED 2004;Kundu et al. 2005). In 1999-2000, estimated production for the ECW was 12.8 million kg of paddy, 6.9 million kg of fish and 69 million kg of vegetables (Chattopadhyay 2001), supporting a population of around 60,000. The revenue generated was impressive, especially under vegetable cultivation (Table 13). The gross revenue across paddy, vegetables and fish of INR 266 million resulted in net returns of INR 80 million (Chattopadhyay 2001). However, the revenues were not used at all to improve the sanitation service chain as those benefiting from the wastewater are not linked to those responsible for its management.Wastewater carries many biological and chemical agents that pose hazards and can impact environmental and human health. Wastewaterrelated health impacts could be direct or indirect, manifesting as short-or long-term illness episodes. Most studies tend to look at potential health risks by identifying contaminants in water rather than actual crop contamination and human exposure during farm work or consumption of contaminated food. The well-known agents of wastewater-associated health hazards (biological and chemical), routes of infection and their relative importance are listed in Bos et al., 2010. The state-level Pollution Control Boards in India have the capacity to test a range of these parameters in their routine water-quality monitoring, including physical, chemical and biological parameters such as heavy metals and a variety of pesticides and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (CPCB 2008). The soil and agricultural products are not monitored routinely although they could be tested on request.Wastewater used for agriculture in the four cities is contaminated with sewage, and hospital and industrial wastes at different degrees, and the possible health impacts will depend on the pollution load, irrigation history and level of exposure on the respective sites. The water and soil-quality studies in all four study sites (Table 14) clearly showed the presence of elements that can have potential health impacts. Ahmedabad and Kanpur have a larger number of industries than the other three cities, and the impacts were evident in the water-quality parameters.There is plenty of evidence in the literature that particular chemical hazards have to be expected. Water, soil and grain analysis in sites close to Sabarmati River (Ahmedabad) showed elevated levels of some metals (Cd, Cr, Cu) in the river water and chromium and copper in the well water. High levels of lead were found in wheat irrigated with groundwater which was also contaminated (Table 14). Heavy metals (Cd, Pb and Zn) were a serious concern in and around Delhi, as several studies showed elevated levels (above the Indian standards under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act) (Awasthi 2000) in commonly eaten vegetables like spinach, okra, and cauliflower (Marshall et al. 2003;Singh and Kumar 2006). In Kanpur and Delhi, the surface water and soils were contaminated with a variety of metals (Cu, Cd, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn), discharged by small-scale industries which are not monitored stringently (Rawat et al. 2003(Rawat et al. , 2009)).However, Kaur and Rani (2006) found that in peri-urban farming lands of Delhi, bioavailability of metals like Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Pd in the soils and surface water/groundwater was within permissible limits, with the exception of one or two samples showing elevated levels, and the geological, soil pH, overirrigation and leaching characteristics of metals bringing out differential occurrences of metals at specific sites. This shows that the contamination can be site-specific, and containment and abatement strategies need to map areas of actual pollution for realistic action plans.In general, data on short-and long-term illnesses due to wastewater handling were not available. Hospital-based data on wastewaterrelated diseases are in general difficult to separate from other exposures. Even more challenging are consumer surveys as in markets, where produce from different farms (safe irrigation water, poorquality water) gets usually mixed. The responses to illness episodes were therefore gathered from survey questionnaires and key informant interviews of health personnel in the cities.Responses to the questionnaire revealed that in Delhi, Kolkata and Hyderabad farmers complained of skin irritations, apart from the \"smell\" that caused breathing problems, but they did not consider it a major problem. Kolkata farmers were aware of the deteriorating water quality, and were taking precautionary measures to safeguard their skins when engaging in wastewater-related activities, using natural herbs and oils. Both Ahmedabad and Kanpur sites were cities with heavy industry, especially tanneries and, thus, their complaints were more pronounced, with visible ulceration, callous tissue formation, heavy skin irritations and dark finger nails. Public health concerns were raised over the high prevalence of helminth ova in commonly consumed vegetables like mint, lettuce, spinach, celery and parsley (Gupta et al. 2009). Increased risks of hookworm infections were observed in farmers (Hyderabad) engaging in sewage farming with high levels of helminth eggs (Asacris lumbricoides: 70 ova/l; hookworms: 76 ova/l; and Trichuris trichura: 4 ova/l) increasing the risk of nematode infections among wastewater farmers while further downstream of the Musi River waterrelated risks decreased significantly (Ensink et al. 2008). Significantly higher morbidity rates were also observed among wastewater farmers in Hyderabad compared to the morbidity rates of the control group that used groundwater for irrigation (Srinivasan and Ratna Reddy 2009). Although the communities did not complain, the health officials in the hospitals stated that dysentery/diarrhea, worm infections and skin problems were common among the communities, and a good majority did not seek treatment at government hospitals. Therefore, private practitioners and local quacks play an important role in treating these communities. As a result, these episodes never get into the overall health statistics. Epidemiological and microbiological investigations along with health economics studies are required to assess the health risks and economic costs associated with wastewater farming in the communities.I n s e v e r a l c a s e s , p r o d u c e g r o w n with contaminated water and soils showed contamination with heavy metals, and worm and bacterial agents. While a risk assessment of Pb and Cd in rice and fodder grass along the Musi River did not show critical levels (Simmons et al. 2007), a study in Varanasi (Sharma et al. 2009;Singh et al. 2004) reported heavy metals (Cd, Pd and Ni) in vegetables at the production and market sites, partly however due to dust deposition. A risk assessment study in Kanpur developed a risk quotient (RQ) for selected contaminants (Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Pb), taking into account the daily intake via the medium -water, food grains, vegetables, milk, etc. -in which each toxicant would be transported into the human body and compared with the acceptable daily intake to study the health impacts. Setting the positive risk at an RQ of 1.0, none of the elements exceeded values above 1, although the contaminant levels were above the permissible values for vegetables. Long exposure to heavy metals is known to cause a number of neurobehavioral disorders (fatigue, insomnia, decreased concentration, depression, irritability, and gastric, sensory and motor symptoms), and farmers exposed to wastewater and contaminated sludge had significantly higher scores for neurobehavioral functions tested, than the controls (Table 15). Urine and blood samples of residents working in the wastewater sites of Kanpur had heavy metals and pesticide residues so that long-term impacts can be expected unless exposure is minimized (Singh et al. 2004).The threshold values of biological as well as chemical hazards associated with wastewater use in agriculture were the foci of previous 1989 WHO guidelines while the newer guidelines adopted a more holistic approach, including a multi-barrier approach and health-based targets for reduction of health risks (WHO 2006). Risk minimization along the exposure pathway from producer to consumers of wastewater irrigated produce offers more opportunities where lowquality water is used than reliance on farm restrictions (Scheierling et al. 2010;Drechsel et al. 2010).Disease burdens associated with wastewater cannot be studied in isolation, as sanitation infrastructure, general hygienic behavior and socioeconomic factors contribute to the overall health status of a community. Low socioeconomic status, poor housing and lack of access to basic amenities like clean water can further confound findings. Cross-sectional and longitudinal health surveys, as well as market surveys for contamination and economic analyses are needed to assess the real health impacts of wastewater use in agriculture (Hanjra et al. 2012, Forthcoming).This study attempted to look at the overall urban wastewater challenges in India (generation, its uses, livelihood benefits and health impacts). It shows that wastewater management in India is becoming an enormous challenge, as urbanization and economic development are outpacing the required infrastructural development. In an attempt to keep up with the demand, municipal authorities are giving high priority to accessing drinking water, to the extent that large volumes of water are being transported from long distances (150 km) that are part of the rural agricultural waterscape. With concerns over high costs of lifting water, energy prices, river pollution, impacts on groundwater and, above all, water scarcity, a renewed interest is generated in looking at wastewater as an asset. However, much needs to be done to explore its full economic potential as direct and indirect reuse of untreated wastewater dominates formal reuse by far. Clearly, this study shows that wastewater needs to be considered as an important component of the water cycles within catchments, if meaningful water management plans are to be implemented within the country. In each landscape, water augmentation has to be considered in conjunction with different wastewater treatment strategies for multiple uses, and should be supported by public policy and social incentives. It can then potentially not only safeguard the downstream users but also provide economic opportunities for alternative uses of wastewater within cities and support the ecosystem services that constitute an integral part of all forms of life. A countrywide approach for wastewater use in agriculture could capture the diversity seen in the Indian context, and could best be done at state level, by identifying nodal agencies for systematic data collection. Indeed, all states must look at the alternative uses of wastewater for their cities, emphasizing the regional priorities, so that effective wastewater management plans can be developed to face the future with less freshwater. The ongoing dispute between states within India for freshwater as well as for wastewater-turned-freshwater shows the urgency of this matter.Assessments of wastewater generation and treatment in the country have improved within the last 10 years although there are still many sewers ending without treatment plants in rivers as well as with treatment plants with a large enough sewer network to reach treatment capacity. The wastewater generated needs to be treated in order to protect the groundwater and ecosystems, and reduce downstream impacts where many livelihoods are supported (CPCB 2009). However, treatment levels can also be designed to meet the requirements of end users but this requires adequate discussion at locations where wastewater is to be used. If at sectoral level, categories of treatment for end use can be agreed upon, and it can be part of the municipal development plan, making effective use of wastewater generated in the cities. Moreover, if annual assessments are made at the city/state level, based on an agreed format, CPCB can perform nationwide projections more effectively, and in a timely manner. With advances made in the IT sector, India could well afford to develop an information management system that connects the entire country. However, capacity-building and the infrastructure have to be developed side by side for an overall positive outcome.Assessments on wastewater irrigated agriculture and livelihood benefits of wastewater are complex. Estimates of potential irrigable land using simple or complex methods have been attempted (Raschid-Sally 2010;Van Rooijen et al. 2010). Using a crude method of calculation, this study found that over 1.1 Mha of land could be irrigated with wastewater generated from Class-I cities and Class-II towns across India. Where wastewater supplies for irrigation are provided through dedicated channels and infrastructure, calculation of potential irrigable land is easier than when wastewater is mixed with, and supplied via, natural waterways. This is because dilution changes the water quality, and estimations may require a different modeling approach altogether as currently underway by IWMI. More methods can be developed by using water-quality parameters, crop types and soil conditions. Modern tools like RS/GIS and more precise mapping of drainage networks can also provide better overall outcomes that can help assess the nutrient loads leaving the city. The urban planning sector which is currently embarking on GIS-based mapping of municipal areas can make land-use mapping as part of their program of work, to develop baselines, upon which future studies can be modeled. Wastewater irrigation can be a dynamic process in the periurban areas, and land-use patterns can change with development and socioeconomic change; therefore, assessments need to involve robust methods to capture this dynamism, spatially and temporally.Benefits in terms of income generation from wastewater use for marginal farmers were more than evident from the case studies. For many, wastewater agriculture was a primary or secondary income source. Case studies showed that wastewater farmers spent less on inputs, and where the nutrient sources could be balanced the outcome was more positive (Delhi, Kanpur and Kolkata) in terms of cost savings and economic returns. This was only based on agricultural production, and a more holistic economic analysis needs to be done to capture the net private benefits to the households and social benefits to the communities.Wastewater agriculture is however not without negative externalities, and health impacts on farmers and consumers are of significant concern as reported above. From an Indian context more studies are required in the areas of wastewater irrigated agriculture, health and food safety, and health economics, specifically at the farm and consumer levels, to capture the diverse settings in which the problems exist. Risk assessment tools like Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) and Quantitative Chemical Risk Assessment (QCRA) can be used to assess the potential risk, which should then be addressed through multiple barrier approaches with health-based targets for risk reduction (WHO 2006). In contrast to the African situation, in India, more emphasis needs to be placed on wastewater treatment processes that remove heavy metals, which appear to have much higher levels than in most parts of Africa (Raschid-Sally and Jayakody 2008).This study suggests a data collection and collation template for assessing the wastewater generation and use within the country. It requires inputs from many sectors and can be further developed at sectoral level, to identify the gaps and include the required institutional capabilities. Such a template will also help strategize on treatment scenarios for respective cities together with economic aspects of wastewater treatment and reuse in India (Mekala et al. 2008a(Mekala et al. , 2008b)). Further, decision makers may find it useful for developing a more holistic national approach for wastewater use in agriculture, with the advantage of feeding national data straight into international databases.Wastewater management and treatment cannot be planned in isolation. They have to be a core part of the strategic plans for water supply and sanitation, irrigation and drainage, energy, and environmental services and other uses (World Bank 2004). Moreover, it becomes very important to consider these aspects in light of water availability for cities, and to highlight the need for continuous inter-sectoral dialogue and action plans to address the ever-increasing water demands (World Bank 2010). Integration of water resources development with water services can provide more support for agricultural water management. India being today more urban and peri-urban than rural, it is time safe wastewater use for agriculture was made a priority in its water development agenda."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0211921275.json b/main/part_2/0211921275.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eb25b51af3858e993f6cefde53cf3c31a5244532 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0211921275.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6c2652c605769d91cc8f176a06d8448e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H_11971.pdf","id":"1439510380"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"33bd3f1a-dade-4907-9bb4-fd061814dde2","content":"This Progress Report on the Project \"Managing Irrigation Systems to Minimize Waterlogging and Salinity Problems\" covers the half yearly period ending December 31, 1992.During the Report Period fielc research activities a t the established research locales on the Upper and Lower Gugera Branch canal of the Lower Chenab Canal (LCC) system and on the Fordwah Sadiqiia Canal System were completed for the Kharif (summer) season and extended, with modifications, for the following Rabi (winter) season.The analytical work based on the field data, focussed on the identification of management interventions which could improve the canal operations in conjunction with groundwater use and also mitigale the adverse impacts of emerging secondary soil salinization. The result of this work were presented in substantive papers presented at IIMl's 1992 IPR (IIMI Internal Program Review).The management intervention: taken up with the Punjab Irrigation Department (PID) in one Division of the LCC were extended t o another Division of that system and proposals were drawn up for initiating similar work on the Fordwah Branch from early 1993. Progress was also made with the development of Decision Support \"Tools\" t o be used in managing the irrigation systems.The use of GIS was advanced 3y developing base maps at different scales and with progressively greater detail down to the tertiary level for the areas for which field research data had been collected.A number of reports were biought out during the report period and work progressed on the forthcoming publications. This Progress Report, following the format of the earlier Reports, describes all the above activities in greater detail.The field research activities Llnder the Project, complementing other IIMI-Pak research activities, were continued a t the three established locations in the Punjab. These consisted of the follow through of the Kharif season program and the initiation of the activities for the following Rabi season starting from October 1992. In addition, special research activities were carriad out at the main system and tertiary levels. A brief description of these activities is given in the following sections.In the data collection program laken up for the Rabi season for the Upper Gugera and Lower Gugera sites, the collection of irrigation application data was terminated except for the Kharif crops yet t o be harvested and at the main system level the focus was shifted t o canal performance. A1 the watercourse level in the Upper Gugera area, continued monitoring of the tubewclls was restricted to four watercourse on the Mananwala distributary. Watercoursi? level work in the Lower Gugera was confined t o the monitoring of groundwater levels only and collection of rainfall data.The data on canal performance, which would relate to the on-going interventions, includes the measurement of the water surface elevations and flow velocities at selected locations on the distributaries including a complete hydraulic survey of the Pir Mahal distributary.In addition t o this data collectioi program a Rapid Appraisal t o extend the results of earlier research findings, has been proposed for the Mananwala distributary which will involve a tubewell census and a surface salinity survey. This is expected t o refine RA techniques for wider application in Punjab. As mentioned in the previous Report, the analysis of the data pertaining t o the role of tubewells in a conjunctive environment was carried forward, with additional data covering the Karkan Minor of the Marianwala distributary. In this work, apart from the physical aspects of groundwater de telopment as related to the availability of canal supplies (tubewell characteristics, densities, usage, water quality) attention was also directed t o the socio-economic facto1.s and in particular t o water markets. Secondary information on cropping patterns and cropping intensities was collected for this purpose. While the preliminary analysis did not establish clear trends, it was apparent that tubewell water quality was a maior determinant of tubewell operation timewith lower usage rates related to groundwater of higher salinities. Similarly, the results indicate that both the availability of ttie irrigation water from the canals and the quality of groundwater determine the extent of water trading. The results of this work would be reported in early 1993 after all thl? analyses are completed.The analysis of canal water otiservations for Mananwala distributary (4 years) and its minor Karkan (2 years) was concluded and an internal report was prepared by Erik van Waijjen entitled: Performance of Mananwala Distributary and Karkan Minor. This paper discusses in detail the observed trends along the canals of (variations in) water levels and outlets discharges, cising many graphs to show the results of different ways of aggregation and analysis of the data. Several factors are identified that affect the amount and variability of the wEter supply to the outlets, such as outlet design, siltation of the canals and diverse interventions such as temporary pipes, cuts by farmers, breaches of 'ghat' points, etc:., and their relative importance for different canal reaches are discussed.Apart from the continuing Kharif data collection activities, a data collection program for Rabi, similar in scope t o lhat at the other field sites, was taken up. A t the main system level, the canal perform,mce of the Fordwah Branch was included and at the watercourse level the focus W E S on the monitoring of tubewells in 5 sample watercourses and a tubewell censiis for three distributaries. In addition, it was proposed to monitor water tables along the Chistian Drain in collaboration with WAPDA Planning (Central).In continuation of the work executed by 2 groups of research associates from Delft University in Rabi I99011991 and Rabi 199111992. reported upon in previous progress reports, a study was initiated on the performance of the Fordwah Branch and its off-taking secondary canals in Kharif 1992. Because the system is non-perennial, hydraulic conditions and requirements are distinctly different in both seasons. Clearly the stress on the system is greater in Kharif than in Rabi as the main canal in Rabi carries only 30% of the average discharge of Kharif. The results of this study were presented at IIMl's Internal Programrrle Review IIPR) in Colombo, Sri Lanka in a paper entitled \"Irrigation Management in the Fordwah Branch Command Area South East Punjab, Pakistan\" by Marcel Kuper and Jacob W. Kijne. The abstract of this paper is attached as Annex 111. The authors found that the information on which operational decisions by the system managers are made are not reliable and even fictitious in some cases. Gauge readings often reflect the official situation rather than actual conditions. Operations are often not transparent, both for the operating agency and for the farmers. As a consequence operating instructions are often contradictory. farmers put pressure on personnel at various levr!ls of the ID and ID does not have the data to counter requests from influentials.Another finding is that while operating staff appears very independent, guidelines t o operate the various structures in the system by the system managers are very limited, resulting in a high variability in the discharge throughout the system and a declining amount of water delivered to secondary canals going from head t o tail due t o limited local objectives of staff. On to/) of this it was found that most structures in the study area do not have rating tables or have rating tables that are outdated. Finally it was established that farmers are irrigai ing very efficiently with Relative Water Supplies between 0.8 and 1 .O both in Kharif 1991 and in Kharif 1992.Early in 1993, a collaboration will be initiate with the Irrigation Department on a number of issues that were raised in this paper. A management intervention, focussing on the information systerri, will be designed with the Irrigation Department to assist in improving the performmce of the irrigation system. Along with that, modelling of the Fordwah Branch will continue to assess the impact of present operational practices and to forecasl the effect of management interventions.The Discussion Paper No. 6 (the Appropriateness of Canal Water Supplies: the Response of the Farmers1 has highlighted the importance of water trading in the 5 watercourses studied by IIMI. To gain a better understanding of water markets, further data analysis was undertaken since the last Progress Report. The first draft of a forthcoming Discussion Paper on water markets was prepared.It seems very important now to go further into the analysis of these water markets. Data collected by IlMl in o:her field stations has shown that water markets are common but quite diversified ac1:ording to the quality of the groundwater or the supply of canal water. Of first impotance will be t o understand the impact of water markets on the allocation of water o f different qualities within watercourses, on the process of salinization and eventualllr on the agricultural production.The progress on the continuing special activities mentioned in the last Progress Report is detailed hereunder:The study that was mentioned in the last progress report, on the processes of planning, coordinating and implemenl ing the maintenance and repair (M&R) activities during the annual canal closure perioc, was finalized. The results were reported in the form The Study of the land reclamstion operations of the PID undertaken by the Department jointly with the Directorate of Land Reclamation (DLR), through the provision of 'reclamation shoots' was initiated before the onset of the operational Kharif season, as brought out in the last Prcgress Report. The study was intended to bring out the organizational and operational constraints of the DLR and PID which detract from the realization of the fullest tienefits from the additional irrigation supplies sanctioned for the reclamation of sali7e soils. It was expected that the study would help t o define management interventions which could be undertaken cooperatively to address the problems of emerging secondary soil salinization manifested by the past IlMl work.This study covering both the institutional and physical aspects, was taken up jointly by the IlMl Irrigation Management Specialist and the Principal Irrigation Engineer, in close collaboration with the staff of the DLR.Relevant information was collected from a sample of 20 watercourses on the Upper Gugera, Lower Gugera and Burala Branches of the LCC, where the 'reclamation shoots' were operational in different stages of the 3-year cycle or where they had been terminated earlier. Flow conditions on the 7 channels on which 'reclamation shoots' were operational were monitored at the head and tails during the operational period July to mid October through periodic measurements to relate discharge with the sanctioned amounts. The respective! roles of the DLR & ID staff at different levels in the sanctioning, installation, operai:ions and closure of the 'shoots' and for the distribution of the additional supplies were determined through interviews. Interviews with farmers and in particular with resource persons were conducted t o collect information on the actual conduct of the reclamation operations through the 'shoots' and their imDact.With the completion of the ficld work the analysis of the data was taken up which would be reported in early 1993. The preliminary analysis so far undertaken has indicated many areas where improvwnents may be possible. Some of the relevant findings are:-Although originally intended lor lands with salinity, based on visual annual surveys, classed as Thur Juzvi (land salt affected t o be extent of 20%) and Thur Nau (land gone out of cultivation during preceding five years) reclamation operations in practice cover all types of land.-Against the officially prescribecl period ( 1 6th April to 15th October), reclamation supplies are restricted t o a period of only 3 to 3 1/2 months from July 1 t o Oct 15, with water allocation of 1.56 litlslha in perennial and 1 . I Glitlslha in nonperennial canal commands.-Although the DLR prepares a comprehensive documentation for the selected watercourses for the reclamation of about 45 acres (in a compact block owned by one farmer, or scattered) tcl qualify for a pipe outlet of I c l s capacity, the selection process is subjective znd not strictly related t o the salinity status of the soils.-The superior role of the PID staff in sanctioning and installing 'reclamation shoots' results in deviations frcim the plans developed by the DLR.--'Reclamation shoots' are genc!rally given in the upper half of the channels which impacts adversely on the equity in water distribution.The farmers are keen t o get 'reclamation shoots' sanctioned for their lands as they contribute t o greater agricultural production and improvement of the lands.On the warabandi study initiated by the Manaqement SDecialist two field visits were made by the Senior Field Resesrch Economist, 6 the Punjab sites, and a detailed questionnaire was prepared for colltction of more field data through the field teams. Meanwhile, data already collected by the field teams in connection with the normal field activities were reviewed on the corisideration that fresh data collection may not be necessary if the existing data base could be optimally used. This data base was scrutinized t o find out which aspects of it could be used. This involved the identification of a common set of watercourses between those to which available data relates and those on which crop yield data had been collected for earlier studies, isolation of data that correspcnded to the same period as for earlier study, identification of the institutional variables included in this whole data set irrespective of the categorimtion given above, so that they can be used appropriately in the waraband I study.The objective of the warabandi study includes an assessment of the potential of farmer-managed water distribution a1 the watercourse level with a view to finding out ways in which farmers can be involved in solving salinity related problems. Another important issue under investigation is the operation of equity criterion embodied in the warabandi system as the inequitable water distribution is seen as a major cause of exacerbating the salinity problem at :he tail-end command areas.Based on the review of the existing data, it has been established that additional data will have to be collected from the field for which a programme would be launched in Jan. 1993.The work on the study of Saliqity Prevention Flows which was to be initiated during the report period, could not be taken up, due t o the engagement of the Irrigation Specialist o n other more pressing assignments. This work would n o w be taken up from early 1993. During the report period activiiies related to the development of an operational Geographic Information System (GI31 progressed t o a stage where the ability of generating value-added maps specific to irrigation concerns was satisfactorily established. Given the variety of data sets collected from the field pertaining to the physical performance of the irrigation system and associated farmers' practices, the task of spatial and temporal representations across a wide range of map scales was t o be an important prelude to the geographic synthesis of GIS-related archives. As such, much of the initial work focussed on map-entry from originals as disparate as Survey of Pakistan map sheets, PID, irrigation system command maps, and SPOT Panchromatic satellite imagery.Following operational set up of the GIS facilities at Lahore office, there was an early need (and expectation) within the IIMI-Pak Staff regarding some demonstrable utility of spatially-attributed irrigation-specificconcerns, especially in respect of the data collected from a host of IlMl Field Staiions. Prior t o any such undertaking, the primary requirements for geographical referencing for variables of interest had to be satisfied. Selection of appropriatevariables for mappedloverlay representations had to encompass the following constraints: level of detail for a given variable of interest varied considerably amongst field sites; i * some sampling sites were too few and far between; watercourse plans for sampl ng sites required updates for their respective boundaries; coordinate referencing ( t h r o u ~~h Survey of Pakistan top0 map sheets) was unavailable for a geographic aiea covered by a field station (Hasilpur); irrigation system plans for soine of the distributary commands had not been updated for over 50 years, and ones that did exist lacked geo-referencing and contained scale anomalies; * * the rigorous nature of detail (lathered from some watercourses necessitated minimum mapping unit of sizt! of Ca. 1 acre, which when compared across Mauza (village maps) resulted n discrepancies of alignments and identification (according to irrigation revenue scheme) These, and many other constraints conditioned choices of initial mapped products. Much work focussed on t7e collection of PID irrigation system plans, the aggregation of tabular data specific t o the mapping units, and selection of control points for georeferencing PI0 maps for subsequent digitizing. The choice of inputs for the mapped inventory was inclusive Contributing external partners: CGIAR innovation(s) or findings that have resulted in this outcome or impact: Herd health interventions (such as Innovation 746) developed to address animal health constraints identified and documented in the flagship in the past years required a suitable training approach. We had also clearly shown the need for gender sensitive approaches -hence community conversations which faciliate dialogue across communities, inlc. men and women, were identified as a promissing option.• 573 -Community conversation as a gender transformative approach in livestock health management (https://tinyurl.com/2hq5mm99)• 746 -Community based gastrointestinal parasite control in small ruminants in Ethiopia (https://tinyurl.com/2oxv8yex)Gender inequalities and zoonoses are concerns in livestock production systems worldwide with especially huge impacts in low and middle-income countries. Livestock keepers are at a high risk of zoonotic diseases due to direct contact with their livestock. Risky practices include home slaughter, poor sanitation, handling sick animals, attending births, handling and preparing animal source food and the consumption of such food when raw or undercooked. Gender differences in roles, access to and control of resources and power relations influence the perceptions and practices to manage risks of zoonotic disease transmission. Using participatory action research, ICARDA and ILRI researchers tested the effectiveness of a transformative approach -community conversations (CCs) -in shifting gender relations and practices that expose livestock keepers to zoonoses in 3 districts in rural Ethiopia. A total of 583 women and 1,005 men in Doyogena, Menz and Borana districts participated in CC sessions. Findings from an evaluation study in Doyogena and Menz covering the first 4 modules showed that CCs are an effective approach to shift mindsets and practices regarding unequal gender roles, access to and control of resources and power relations as well as handling sick animals and the consumption of animal-source foods to minimize zoonoses (1). Researchers found significant attitude and behavior changes throughout the process of CCs. Changes occur through a social learning and reflective process whereby community members first recognize and analyze the problem, reflect collectively on their perceptions and how they inform their day-to-day practices, make shifts in mental models and then commit to action (2). The change process is influenced by social structures, networks, institutions, complementary activities, and facilitation processes. The level of engagement by the communities in the CC activities and the ensuing community transformations has attracted the interest of extension agents, official veterinarians and other service providers. A training of trainer module (3) has since been developed to increase the uptake and expansion of the CC tool across the country. To date a first batch of development and local researchers was trained in how to run the modules independently, with an action plan for trainings developed and enacted (4)."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0292480025.json b/main/part_2/0292480025.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..854ecbf4c0c5e297be29ad5929fb12f52f685cc6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0292480025.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1896ee2b5e98736200ec14cda1dfa3d7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d1dbfa86-98a0-4e1c-9532-e343f3940db8/retrieve","id":"403495234"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1b0c7125-81c0-4fc9-8aee-40143ac0bb1e","content":"For a dairy industry to function effectively and efficiently all actors, whether producers, market agents or consumers, need good information on a variety of subjects (table 1). Facilitating the flow of such information presents a particular challenge in Kenya, where the dairy industry is a major source of livelihood and is predominantly based on small-scale production and marketing.A comprehensive review of the knowledge system of the complex smallholder dairy subsector was conducted by the Smallholder Dairy Project (SDP) between November 2002 and May 2003 (box 1).Table 1. Some types of information important for the dairy sector ■ Access to information is a constraint for many actors in the smallholder dairy subsector, and uncertainty exists regarding the quality and reliability of the information that is available.In a liberalized dairy sector the respective roles played by public and private sector actors in information dissemination need to be clarified and coordinated.■ Professional associations and industry bodies could take a lead in improving accountability and quality of information, to the benefit of all in the industry.Groups play a critical role in the sector, and need better support and information on effective group management.■ Particular benefit could be gained from addressing the information needs of small-scale milk traders.A network of information centres could improve access to information by all actors.The survey used the rapid appraisal of agricultural knowledge systems (RAAKS) method, a participatory methodology for understanding information flows in complex systems 1 . The method involves working with multiple actors to describe and understand how they generate, access and pass on relevant information. Findings are used to facilitate action planning to address constraints and utilize opportunities found in the system.A series of workshops and interviews was held at national level and in three districts -Nakuru, Vihiga and Kiambu. Workshop participants identified a wide range of actors to be interviewed (table 2). Various RAAKS tools were used to explore the roles, objectives, linkages and impacts of different actors from their own perspectives. Feedback meetings of the study teams clustered findings and brought out key areas of constraint and opportunity.These were explored in further key informant workshops to verify the findings and to start working towards action plans for improvement.Key policy-relevant findings of the study are presented below, and illustrated with some specific examples.A large number of private, civil society and public actors are involved in generating and making available information. Linkages between actors are complex but are presented in a simplified manner in figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 presents information flows between actors at a local level (including the local extensions of national groups); figure 2 presents information flows between high-level actors at a national level, indicating where information feeds through to local level actors. Information flows are classified by colour (see key); more important flows are represented by thicker arrows. In some instances (for example informal milk traders in figure 1) internal flow among individuals in some actor categories is also represented.Linkages between these actors are often weak, and almost all actors in the study had problems accessing and passing on information 2 . Particular constraints were identified as follows:■ Lack of awareness of sources: Several actors, such as small-scale farmers and traders, were unaware of where or how to access information. Licensing of small-scale traders, who play a crucial role in the dairy sector, may help them to access information, and this issue is now being addressed by the Kenya Dairy Board and non-governmental organizations, supported by SDP research 3 . ■ Inability to access sources: It is difficult, for example, for individual farmers to link with the wide range of actors who could provide technical information on milk production and handling. Public researchers and extension workers have limited resources or opportunities for accessing and passing on information.Information gaps: There is a lack of information provision in such areas as markets and prices, credit, finance and legal services, business services and effective group formation and management.Weak links in the chain: Formal public research-extension linkages exist but are often ineffective 4 . Some of the most effective sharing of information was based on informal links between individuals, including spread of information between farmers. Problems may arise when both public and private sector actors provide information within a recently liberalized dairy sector: ■ Inconsistent quality of information from private sector: Private suppliers of feeds and drugs provide information on their products to farmers. However, farmers have no means of judging the accuracy of this information. In addition, there is little effective regulation of the quality of this information through enforced advertising standards.Lack of information on animal health: Private animal health workers (vets and artificial insemination practitioners) are generally viewed as service providers rather than sources of information. They often lack support from their professional organizations towards providing a service in which information is valued.Low appreciation of the value of information: Dairy farmers show greater willingness to pay for inputs and services than to pay for information. This may be because of limited farmer capacity to convert information into tangible benefit; or because it is felt that information should be provided free. Private and public sector roles are not clearly differentiated by actors. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0296511543.json b/main/part_2/0296511543.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e899e5057322f3294bd64dbb0defda5aea5f1f5b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0296511543.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b094d95d75a66cc1b9606b94e2474ce3","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8515f0ee-eef9-4455-976e-342f5aeeff18/retrieve","id":"1905568236"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0340db7a-a4e7-409b-81bd-03894b4dc79c","content":"Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 (Foc TR4), the causal agent of Fusarium wilt of banana (FWB), is currently the major threat to the banana industry worldwide (Dita et al. 2018).Restricted to South Asia for more than 20 years, Foc TR4 has spread in the last years to the Middle Further analyses to identify the presence/absence of full sequences for the putative effector genes (Secreted In Xylem -SIX) and their allelic copies, also revealed that the SIX genes profile of the strains isolated from Querecotillo matched with previously reported Foc TR4 isolates (Czislowski "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0300511052.json b/main/part_2/0300511052.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7bf9982a2d90a6b6a76995f1ad68d0e360daff0 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0300511052.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"24c12e8471d49f398ba4630382b73eff","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b76db559-3630-48c3-bda2-6aa27330eaaa/retrieve","id":"625835763"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6d879a96-8c20-404a-8ac6-4b4ddf56eb5d","content":"Emerging evidence suggests that working towards multiple objectives, including those related to mitigating and adapting to climate change, increasing gender equity and youth inclusion, and improving nutrition increases the chances of interventions to achieve their goals and the likelihood that they have long-lasting positive impacts across a range of development objectives (Tallis et al. 2019, Yavinsky et al. 2015). Conversely, interventions that do not follow a more integrated approach may miss tradeoffs across well-being outcomes, exclude vulnerable groups, or even increase the marginalization and vulnerability of others and ultimately might fall short of their objectives. To address this problem and favor the integration of the mainstreaming themes in IFAD operations, a team of researchers at the International Food Policy Research Institute developed a conceptual framework for understanding the linkages between climate change, gender, youth, and nutrition within the larger context of resilience for development drawing on different bodies of literature on these topics (Figure 1). Resilience is particularly suited to develop a coherent, inclusive and rigorous method to plan for interventions and to analyze on-going interventions that work at the intersection of multiple disciplines. Resilience is integrative by construction; it facilitates collaboration among experts of different disciplines and combines relations among human and natural systems.Central to the concept of resilience are people's capacities. This puts an emphasis on how interventions and programs can support the building of capacities for different groups of people to achieve specific well-being outcomes. People's capacity to respond to shocks and stresses and to negotiate for their preferred solutions determines the range of viable responses. Existing capacities also influence the type of impact that interventions have on households' wellbeing and the potential for people to fully take advantage of interventions.Gender and age are critical social distinctions that influence vulnerability, capacities, impacts, and the feasibility of interventions. In particular, women and youth often have different needs and preferences from others in the community or other individuals in the household and typically have less bargaining power and control over resources. Other social distinctions also strongly influence resilience and capacities, including ethnicity, class, race, caste, and sexual orientation among many others.Figure 1. The Climate Change, Gender, Youth and Nutrition integrated analysis framework Drawing on this framework, the IFPRI mainstreaming team has engaged with IFAD missions in four sub-Saharan African countries (Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi and Uganda) to generate lessons for the mainstreaming of climate change, gender, youth and nutrition in IFAD's operations. The IFPRI team engaged with IFAD missions at various stages of the project cycle to test the applicability of the framework to the mainstreaming process.In July 2019, the IFPRI mainstreaming team joined an IFAD mission in Uganda for the design of the National Oilseeds Project (NOSP). The goal of this engagement was to facilitate the inclusion and integration of the mainstreaming areas in the project design and implementation plans. This experience made clear the importance and advantages of a mainstreaming team to work embedded in the project planning phase. This report situation analysis that the team used to support recommendations on entry points for more integrated mainstreaming of climate change, gender, youth and nutrition in the design of the NOSP.Uganda experiences relatively humid conditions and moderate temperatures throughout the year, with mean daily temperatures of 28 °C with the average monthly temperatures ranging from a minimum of 15 °C in July to a maximum of 30 °C in February. The highest temperatures are observed in the North, especially in the North-East, while lower temperatures occur in the South.Historical data indicate that during the period the 1975 to 2009 average temperature during the two rainy seasons (March-June and June-September) has warmed more than 0.8 °C. This transition to an even warmer climate is likely to amplify the impact of decreasing rainfall and periodic droughts and will likely reduce crop harvests and pasture availability. A significant warming has been measured in Uganda for instance the Uganda's National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) cites an average temperature increase of 0.28 °C per decade in the country between 1960 and 2010, being January and February the most affected by this warming trend, averaging an increase of 0.37 °C per decade.The frequency of hot days in the country has increased significantly while the frequency of cold days has decreased.The annual rainfall totals vary from 500 mm to 2800 mm; mean annual rainfall ranges between less than 900 mm in the driest districts to an average of above 1,200 mm per year in the wettest districts located within the Lake Victoria Basin, eastern and the north-western parts of Uganda (37,38). Precipitations have a bimodal distribution in the south to central parts of Uganda, with two rainy seasons (March-June and October-January), while northern-easterly region experiences one long rainy season. Floods and droughts are the most frequent weather hazards. For instance, the cattle corridor, located in the dry-land region, is prone to drought, while the northern region is especially vulnerable to both floods and droughts.Time series indicate that rainfall, on average, has been decreasing. Several analyses find an overall decrease in average rainfall of about 12% during the past 34 years in Uganda, with the greatest decreases in the regions of central and western Uganda. Furthermore, during the period 2000-2009 rainfall has been, on average, about 8 percent lower than rainfall between 1920 and 1969.Climate projections based on data from Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) using Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 scenarios indicate the possibility of an increase in the country's average temperature in the order of +2.5 °C in the next 50 years (Figure 3, panels e-h). Projections for the next 80 years point to a possible increase of 4.5 °C.Many climate models predict an increase in short rains (September -November) as global temperatures rise (Figure 3, panels a-d). However, the Horn of Africa region has become observationally drier during the 20th century. This drying trend against the projected increase in rainfall place East Africa into an apparent climate paradox which is generally considered as an indication that more accurate model simulations and an improved understanding of the geophysical processes governing the rainfall over East Africa is necessary. Given these inconsistencies and the errors in climate models' ability to simulate the current climate, whether or not the future climate in East Africa will become wetter as a result of climate change is an open question. Keeping in mind the existing uncertainty in climate projections, we analyze the projected effects of climate change on some of Uganda's major crops. Figure 4 reports the projected changes in yields for eight crops and four different climate models. Even though we do not have projections for sesame, we can use the effects on millet and sorghum as rough proxies. According to GFDL projections sesame could be not negatively affected by climate change but all other climate models show a decrease in yields. Groundnut is negatively affected under all climate scenario while soybean fairs better than all other crops. Given the climate projections of GFDL and MIROC, yields appear to increase but using the other two climate models (HADGEM and IPSL) yields are expected to decrease. One of the main challenges being faced by the oil seed producers is the late on set of rains and late cessation of the first season that results in replanting in some cases or late planting and harvesting of the produce. The late harvesting results in drying challenges and thus increased post-harvest losses. Farmers also complained about the increasing risk of droughts and prolonged dry spells that adversely impact their yields. The rainfall variability is compounded by the low accuracy of the climate information being disseminated to the framers.The priority reflected in Uganda's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) is adaptation. The country aims to reduce vulnerability and address adaptation in agriculture and livestock, infrastructure and water sectors, among others. The strategy to build climate change resilience includes the scaling-up of sustainable land management and climate smart agriculture.Given the particularly uncertain climate outlook for this region of Africa, it is essential that farmers are given the necessary support and information to develop flexible adaptation and contingency plans. A range of technologies are already being promoted and implemented in the country. Among these are: integrated soil fertility management, agro-forestry, crop diversification, conservation agriculture (crop rotation, mulching, green cover crops and low-or no-till), intercropping legumes with other crops, water management practices and adaptable planting times. These practices, which are climate smart agriculture practices already indicated as viable adaptation option in the country's NDC, must be evaluated considering crop specific performance given soil and other local conditions. Furthermore, to ensure crop performance and to protect farmers' livelihoods and the implementation of important instruments like crop insurance, the availability of climate information and early warning systems is necessary.The priority actions that NOSP can contribute to in the agriculture sector include expanding climate information services and early warning systems, climate smart agriculture practices, expanding value addition and post-harvest handling and storage, encouraging agro-forestry and water use efficiency.Uganda intends to follow a climate resilient and low carbon development pathway. The priorities for mitigation include the forestry and wetlands sectors.Agriculture is the main occupation of women in Uganda-72% of all employed women and 90% of all rural women work in agriculture, compared to 53% of rural men (Garcia 2006). Women play a prominent role in planting, weeding, harvesting, post-harvest processing, storage and food preparation, while men focus on land clearing and marketing of high value crops. Food crops (such as plantains and tubers) are typically controlled by women while men tend to have greater control over cash crops and income (Kasente et al. 2001;Garcia 2006). Other studies confirm that women are at a disadvantage in terms of crops sold in formal markets that generate higher revenues, while maintaining more control over lower-revenue crops (Njuki et al. 2011). Moreover, Peterman et al (2011) find persistent lower productivity on female-owned plots and among female-headed households, after controlling for a range of socio-economic variables, agricultural inputs and crop choices with important differences based on crop choice, agroecological zone, and biophysical characteristics. De la Ocampos et al. ( 2016) attribute differences in productivity largely to differences in crop choice and factors of production, including women's labor constraints, and lack of access to agricultural inputs and extension.Promotion of non-traditional exports, such as oilseeds, is considered an important agricultural development strategy for the country, given risks of over-reliance on world markets for traditional cash crops like coffee, tea and cotton (Kasente et al. 2001). However, investments in value chains for nontraditional exports, like oilseeds, have important gender implications given women's more limited involvement in cash crop farming. In particular, there are inherent risks to women's empowerment with commercialization of traditional food crops that they control, like groundnut and sesame.Constraints. While women are increasingly involved in the cash crop production, including in the oilseed sector, they lack control over income and benefits from it given men's control over marketing activities (Garcia 2006;Vorley et al. 2015). Other constraints to women benefiting from oilseed production relate to their lack of ownership of land, greater risk aversion, lack of access to inputs (like seed), and labor burden. Production of certain crops, such as soybean, and post-harvest processing practices using traditional methods are particularly labor intensive (Kasente et al. 2001;Vorley et al. 2015). Women's priorities to increase their participation in oilseed value chains include access to labor-saving technologies, access to finance, and group formation and strengthening (Vorley et al. 2015). Women also tend to lack access to agricultural information as well as information on climate change and climate-smart practices compared to men (Katungi et al. 2008;Kisauzi et al. 2012), which can limit their successful participation in commercial oilseed production.Data shows that 31 % of households across the country are female-headed and the rate is only slightly lower in rural areas at 30 % (UNHS 2017). Female-headed household often have particular vulnerabilities related to lack of access to family labor for agricultural production, weaker social networks, and limited access to resources and information (Katungi, et al. 2008). Widows in Uganda are considered to be particularly vulnerable due to social norms, which limit their control over physical and financial resources (UNHS 2017). Married women often have more access to resources and family labor but may be at a greater disadvantage in terms of other aspects of empowerment such as decision-making and mobility.In terms of access to and decisions on credit, 66 % of women report having access to credit from any source, with the most common sources being friends or relatives (41.3 %) and group-based micro-finance (31.8 %). Most women have input into the decision to borrow (69.4 %) and how to use the loan funding (73.3 %) across all loan sources. Reasons for taking loans were similar across men and women, according to UNHS data (2017). Primary reasons for both men and women include: to smooth consumption (reported by % of men and 25 % of women who borrowed), to pay education expenses (26 % of men and 23 % of women), and to purchase inputs/capital for non-farm enterprises (19 % of men and 18 % of women) (UNHS 2017).Women Empowerment in Agriculture Index. The Feed the Future baseline survey conducted in 2012, showed an overall WEAI score of 0.86. The measure of individual empowerment without considering the gap in scores between men and women (the 5DE) shows that 57.8 % of women achieve empowerment (5DE score of 0.80 or above). Among women who did not achieve empowerment, access to and control over productive and financial resources (credit), time burden, and community leadership appear as the domains where women have the lowest scores. Women are much more likely to achieve adequacy in the domains of production decision-making and control over income. Sixty-one percent of women achieve gender parity with the main adult male decision-maker in the household. Baseline WEAI data were analyzed in relation to other development outcomes. Findings show that women in households with moderate to severe hunger are significantly less likely to achieve adequacy in autonomy in production, ownership or control of assets, control over the use of income, and satisfaction with leisure time, while women in households with moderate to severe hunger are significantly more likely to achieve adequacy with respect to access to and decisions on credit. The correlation between hunger and access to and decisions on credit is likely related to credit being used to smooth consumption among the most vulnerable agricultural households rather than for productive purposes. Women with higher decisionmaking scores have statistically lower levels of wasting of children under 5 years.Similarly, with respect to decisions on the use of income from these activities, results show that women that participate in cash crop farming report having input into most or all decisions related to income from this activity (91.8 %). These results suggest that increasing women's involvement in cash crop farming would lead to other gains in terms of decision-making over production and income. DHS data from 2016 show similar results with 91 % of currently married women participating in decisions about the use of their earnings (53 % make decisions on their own, and 38 % make decisions jointly with their husband).In terms of specific decisions related to agricultural production and expenditures, WEAI data show that the majority of women are involved to a medium or high extent in decisions related to getting inputs for agricultural production (79 %), the types of crops to grow (85 %), whether to take crops to market (75.8 %), minor household expenditures (90 %), major household expenditures (65.6 %), own wage or salary employment (86.9 %). DHS data show that currently married women (age 15-49) participate in household decisions either alone or jointly with their husbands on their own health care their own health care (74%) and visits to their family or relatives (72%) than in decisions about making major household purchases (64%) (FtF FEEDBACK, 2015).While the results for Uganda related to women's participation in production decision-making and income decisions are promising, women's actual influence in production and income decisions may vary by crop and the level of profitability. More disaggregated analyses at the crop level and at various stages of commercialization are needed to understand gender roles in and benefit from cash crop value chains, including oilseeds.Given that there are various dimensions of women's empowerment in agriculture, interventions in the sector are likely to have different impacts on these various aspects. Commercialization of oilseeds is no exception. In particular, positive and negative impacts are expected to occur. Hypotheses include:1) Commercialization of oilseeds traditionally controlled by women as food crops (i.e. groundnut and sesame) will reduce the share of household income and assets that women control.Similarly, commercialization of oilseeds may reduce women's involvement in decisions related to production of and income received from these crops. The use of the Gender Action Learning System (GALS) should mitigate this negative impact to some extent.New labor-saving technologies and services introduced by service providers will save women's time-particularly for those women already involved in oilseed production and processing. Women not previously involved in oilseed production may see their labor burden increase if they are adding new activities to their existing workload.Incentives and capacity building to increase women's active participation in and leadership of farmer organizations and service provision (agronomists, machine operators etc.) will increase women's leadership roles in the community.Agriculture and related jobs are likely to dominate the employment opportunities for rural youth for the foreseeable future, making the welfare of youth closely tied to trends in agricultural development. Environmental risks related to climate change, land fragmentation and degradation, therefore, pose considerable risk to young people whose livelihoods will depend on agriculture (Brooks et al. 2019). Investments in agricultural research and development and agricultural infrastructure are essential to mitigate these risks and protect rural livelihoods into the future (ibid). Wage labor in the agri-food system will also become an increasingly important source of employment for youth (Dolislager et al. 2019).Young people under the age of 35 are also more likely to migrate for reasons including: following family, income, marriage, and education (UNHS 2017). Increasing land scarcity due to high population growth will likely drive employment and migration decisions of rural youth into the future (Yeboah et al. 2019). Therefore, policies are needed to increase youth access to land and security of tenure in order to sustain agricultural productivity growth and drive rural transformation (ibid). Educational attainment is increasing over time, suggesting that young people are being educated at higher rates than in the past. Between 2012/13 and 2016/17, the percentage of persons aged 15 years and above that lacked any formal education dropped by 9 percentage points from 21% to 12% (UNHS 2017). The main reason for leaving school was lack of funding/not affordable (68% for boys and 65% for girls). Ten percent of both boys and girls left school because their parents decided to take them out or they had a calamity at home. Four percent of girls also left due to pregnancy. Overall, only 6% of both boys and girls left school because they reached their desired education level (UNHS 2017).It is often argued that youth present opportunities for agricultural transformation given special characteristics, qualities, motivations, and abilities. While these claims are widely made, there is currently no research to support the notion that youth are more innovative, creative, and more likely to adopt new agricultural technology like improved seeds, fertilisers, irrigation and mechanisation; engage with value chains, integrate ICTs into their livelihood activities, or seize new business opportunities as service or input providers (Sumberg and Hunt, forthcoming).Despite limited evidence about the economic or transformative benefits of investing in rural youth, addressing the needs of this large and growing demographic is essential from a social equity and longterm sustainability perspective. Agricultural value chains both on-farm and off-farm could offer promising career opportunities for young Ugandans, if appropriate information and start-up resources were available for rural youth.Investment priorities for rural youth depend on the level of transformation of the country and the existing opportunity structure (Arslan et al. 2019). Opportunities for rural youth vary by local context depending on the natural resource base, market access, social norms, and preferences, as well as household characteristics (RDR 2019;Sumberg et al. 2019). In countries, like Uganda, with low levels of rural transformation, investments should focus on building the capacities of rural youth through investments in infrastructure and education and on increasing the productivity, connectivity, and agency of youth in agriculture (Arslan et al. 2019;RDR 2019;Sumberg et al. 2019). Commercialization should increase the rural opportunity structure for youth to participate in and benefit from agricultural transformation.Programs targeted at increasing the opportunities for rural youth should consider gender differences in constraints and needs by young men and women. Young women and men experience the transition to adulthood differently depending on the level of structural and rural transformation of the country (Doss et al. 2019). Research using sex-disaggregated data across 42 countries shows young women are more likely to have transitioned into domestic and reproductive roles and less likely to be in school or employed, and less likely to own land (ibid).The NOSP offers an opportunity to assess youth opportunities and engagement in the process of commercialization. During field visits, smallholders in the NOSP areas described education as the most important thing for the youth and were concerned about consistent ability to pay school fees and disruptions to their education. Some youth groups visited was not explicitly or predominantly made up of youth and thus did not likely address their particular needs or priorities. The older generations were maintained as group members with the justification that they pass on knowledge and provide guidance to other members who are youth. Youth farmer groups have been formed at schools as part of GoU guidelines. These groups consisted of young girls and boys who were trained in agriculture and farming techniques and engaged in practical demonstrations and field work. VODP2 also conducted trainings and field work as a pilot in two schools and reported generating positive results in informing young farmers about benefits and production/harvesting techniques of oilseeds and in increasing their interest in agriculture sector.The UNHS 2016/17 Report provides per capita estimates of calorie consumption by food group based on household consumption estimates. Figure 2 shows that total calorie consumption and the shaded orange area of the figure shows the food energy gap for each sub-region, which is the gap between average population dietary energy requirement (ADER) for Uganda, which is 2091 calories per person per day, and per capita consumption in that sub-region. Most sub-regions face significant estimated food energy gaps. Only Teso and West Nile are just above the cut-off, though it is likely that some proportion of their populations do fall below. For those with higher calorie consumption, the share of calories from staples tends to be higher. Table 2 breaks down estimated per capita calories consumption by food group within each sub-district. Overall, staple food consumption makes up a higher than optimal share of the diet, and nutrient rich foods are greatly under consumed. The Uganda Nutrition Action Plan 2011 sets a target of 75% of calories coming from foods other than staples. Only Bugishu/Elgon meets this target, but it also has the lowest per capita calorie consumption across all food groups. Of interest to NOSP, the share of calories from nuts and pulses is very low. For most sub-regions considered, improving diets will require increasing the amounts of nutrient-rich foods while maintaining the quantities of staples consumed. While for Lango and Bugishu/Elgon, improving diets will require increasing consumption of all food groups. While increased production of nutritious foods like oilseeds may increase supply and decrease prices, participation on high-value supply chains can also disincentivize consumption as people prefer to sell for profit, such as in the example of quinoa among indigenous Peruvian communities (McDonell, 2016). The inadequacy of diets of children from six months to two years in Uganda is a major challenge. An alarming 15% of children overall received both sufficient diversity and meal frequency to yield a minimum acceptable diet in 2016 (UBOS & ICF, 2018). This rate falls to an alarming low of 2.5% of children under-2 receiving a minimum acceptable diet in Acholi, where stunting is also very high. Other sub-regions with high prevalence of stunting and wasting also have very low rates of adequate child feeding, except for West Nile which is above the national average for minimum diet adequacy but still suffers among the highest rates of stunting and wasting, suggesting that non-diet factors like health shocks may be exacerbating child nutrition outcomes.Stunting and wasting. Based on the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (2018) data collected in 2016, national stunting prevalence is 29% nation-wide. In Uganda, stunting is associated with rural residence and low levels of mothers' education. In the target areas, Bugisu, Karamoja, Acholi and West Nile experience higher stunting rates than the national average by between 2 and 7%.Wasting is higher than the national average in all NOSP targeted sub-regions except for Teso, by between 2 and 7%. In particular, Bugisu, Karamoja, Acholi, and West Nile all have wasting rates of 9-10%, which is extremely high. In particular, in Karamoja and West Nile the prevalence of severe wasting is nine times higher than what would be expected in a well-nourished population (UNICEF-Uganda, 2018). Furthermore, in West Nile, wasting increased from 6.2% to 10.4% from 2011 to 2016. While in Karamoja, wasting increased from 7.1% to 10% from 2011-2016(UBOS & ICF, 2012, 2018;UNICEF-Uganda, 2018).These statistics suggest that these areas have experienced major population-wide health or income shocks, and national-wide analysis finds that wasting is correlated poverty (UNICEF-Uganda, 2018). In Karamoja during this same time period (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016), the proportion of the population relying on subsistence agriculture increased from 6% to 51%, highlighting the need to better understand the vulnerabilities associated with shifts in livelihoods approaches (UNICEF-Uganda, 2018).Drivers of food and nutrition insecurity. Some national studies provide additional insights on the potential drivers of food security and nutrition problems in the North. In particular, the source of household income and women's role in food production and marketing play a role in nutrition outcomes (Azzari et al., 2015;Kirk et al., 2018;Whitney et al., 2018). For instance, women's control over which crops are produced supports them to deliver diverse diets for the family (through own consumption) and fulfil cash needs (through small-scale sales) (Whitney et al., 2018). While animal foods are an important part of a healthy diet, only ownership of small ruminants appears to influence nutrition outcomes in Uganda (Azzari et al., 2015). And finally, non-agricultural self-employment (in contrast to wage labor) seems to support better nutrition outcomes (Kirk et al., 2018).The IFPRI team joined the Uganda mission and design team to support mainstreaming in the NOSP. Through this engagement, the IFPRI team helped the IFAD mission by applying a mainstreaming lens to the process of stakeholder engagement, preparing the project's SECAP, and by suggesting components, project activities, and indicators for monitoring and evaluation to be included in the project plans. The IFPRI team identified clear entry points for mainstreaming activities and suggested a series of activities that weaved mainstreaming in the project operations (see the appendix for details). Specific areas of engagement included:• Situation analysis for each mainstreaming topic • Develop a protocol for stakeholder engagement/assessment using checklist linked to framework • Meet each component lead to define mainstreaming activities (shown in Figures 2-4 • Conduct a social diagnostic assessment within each hub to identify social dynamics that should be addressed in the design and implementation of the project. Through this assessment high risk communities with a critical gender imbalance will be identified and intervention approaches will be tailored to mitigate these risks.• Ensure social inclusion in farmer organizations as part of the stakeholder platforms as well as trainings, information/extension, demonstration to farmers. This may include specific targets for women-led groups in areas where women's active participation in mixed groups is limited and where women prefer this approach. All facilitators/brokers should be trained in gender dynamics to solicit input from women and youth and other marginal groups in mixed groups to ensure that their priorities are reflected in investment plans and selection of services.• Use of Household Methodologies (GALS and HH Mentoring) to ensure women's participation in household expenditure decisions. The GALS also includes nutrition and climate change. The methodologies will enable farmers to identify common areas of gender inequality limiting women's and youth's development specifically in value chains and household/community progression.• Provide incentives to increase women's and young people's participation in and benefit from service provision, including mechanization. Increasing the participation of women in the provision of the services envisaged, either as auxiliary or technical, will build the capacity of women along the value chain to participate in and benefit from the commercialization effort.• Promote good agricultural practices and technologies that are environmentally sustainable, and nutrition-and gender-sensitive. Promotion of renewable energy such as dryers that use crop residues instead of fuel wood to avoid deforestation, precision fertilizer application to increase resource efficiency, integrated soil fertility management and crop rotation and diversification.• Provide equipment and training to support greater aflatoxin control and awareness. In field practices aflatoxin control measures include selection of drought tolerant seed varieties and good agriculture practices to reduce crop stress. Managing moisture levels post-harvest with appropriate drying technology, such as simple drying racks, and improved storage facilities would also limit further contamination.• Improve access to nutrition knowledge and health food culture through nutrition trainings and other awareness raising activities. This can be done through partnerships with existing programs to address challenges high levels of stunting, wasting and micro-nutrient deficiencies.• Build capacity of facilitators/brokers in climate risk mapping/vulnerability assessments. Using downscaled future projections the existing adaptation strategies can be improved and options provided through the NOSP advisory services.• Invest in the development of climate information services and R&D on drought tolerant varieties.The project can also promote different climate smart agriculture practices to contribute to the NDC priorities by scaling up practices such as minimum tillage, mulching and other soil and water conservation measures and improved water use efficiency and farm management.• Ensure the design and construction of rural roads is informed by climate risk analyses. The downscaled climate risk models will be used in the risk mapping and integrate measures such as water harvesting structures and improved drainage.• Incorporate sites for the land degradation surveillance framework and their operationalization to monitor the health of the soil and land use changes.• Adhere to the SECAP and national environmental regulations in the development of the roads infrastructure. The impact assessments will have to be included in the budgets for the infrastructure development and approvals obtained from NEMA.• Appoint dedicated staff for social inclusion and environment and climate change at management as well as implementation levels."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0309183865.json b/main/part_2/0309183865.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b3e50c2650214ee62f4f99ca335ed1c587cc6c3b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0309183865.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2471b9d6571a3b6af8cf21e4817f268d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1d6fe332-8ca1-4442-ba1b-de9d2492b5d8/retrieve","id":"-750570386"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"cd576c56-4ec5-45d4-80ae-c624184b98a8","content":"Fair dealing and other rights are in no way affected by the above. The parts used must not misrepresent the meaning of the publication. ILRI would appreciate being sent a copy of any materials in which text, photos etc. have been used.As in many southern African countries, cattle is the traditional indicator of wealth in Swaziland and, since prestige is derived from the number of cattle owned rather than their quality or commercial value, overgrazing is rife. There is however an opportunity for smallholder livestock keepers to increase their income from livestock sales as national and regional demand for meat is increasing and there are unmet export quotas for Europe (European Union and Norway).Extensive production systems are common for cattle producers with little investment as capital is limited to buy inputs and adopt new technologies in order to increase productivity and improve the quality of their animals. The above and dependency on rainfall, have been making formal lenders hesitate to disburse loans to farmers to boost productivity. However, increased access to irrigated land through various rural development programs such as the Lower Usuthu smallholder irrigation project (LUSIP) offers new opportunities to farmers. There is a potential to start grass/forage based fattening of animals which will significantly reduce the production costs and improve quality.The research conducted looks into cattle producers, fatteners and traders' production and marketing behavior and access to credit in two areas of Swaziland in order to inform the development of a financial instrument (a loan) that will help producers, fatteners and traders improve their competitiveness.The initial study (focus group discussions) was conducted between October 2013 and February 2014 followed by individual in depth interviews that lasted up to June 2014. In total one hundred and eleven persons were interviewed: fifty three cattle producers, thirty six cattle fatteners and twenty two cattle traders. The average age of cattle producers is 50.3 years, and 51.3 years for cattle traders. Cattle fatteners have the lowest average years (45.4), and mostly females (44%) compared to the producers and traders groups. The collected data was coded and entered into excel and analysed using STATA version 13.0.Main findings are:• Sales of beef cattle are the main source of income for all three groups, although this is of least importance for cattle traders. Traders obtain more than one third of their income from other agricultural activities such as livestock production, fattening, transport, etc. The high percentage of revenue derived from livestock by producers and fatteners is because many of them are unemployed and have no other source of income, selling a head of cattle will pay for household expenditures including school fees. About one third of cattle producers interviewed had not sold cattle in the past two years. Revenues from sugarcane farming contribute 30 to 35% for producers and fatteners. Around half of the producers, almost all fatteners and two thirds of traders interviewed were part of an association. • The area surveyed falls under Swazi national land. The average land size for cattle producers, fatteners and traders interviewed was 3.5, 2.3 and 3.8 hectares respectively. This land is mainly used for vegetables, maize and cotton farming. During the off-season, cattle are allowed to vii graze in the fields. Apart from land and cattle ownership, farmers own a number of assets such as vehicles, plough, and permanent houses. • All three groups deal with multiple livestock species (cattle, goats, sheep, pigs and chickens).Forty-one per cent of cattle producers own less than ten animals. For cattle fatteners, livestock ownership is almost evenly distributed for herd size of up to 50 cattle. Almost all the traders have been involved in cattle trading activities with different intensities during the past 12 months. Herd composition varies; more than half of the herds of producers are cows older than 4 years. Fatteners have mostly animals less than 24 months of age for both sexes. • Extensive systems are the most common for cattle producers and cattle fatteners. Twenty-five per cent of fatteners has indicated the exclusive use of stall-feed system (zero grazing), while other cattle producers and cattle fatteners indicated relying mostly on grazing supplemented in the dry season. Only 7% of the fatteners use commercial feed. The use of sugarcane tops still very low among farmers albeit this residue of the sugarcane industry is abundant in the region. • The average number of cattle sold during the last 12 months by cattle producers is 3.47; traders sold 37 and fatteners 18. The two main market channels for all groups are butchers and Swaziland Meat Industries (SMI). For producers, selling to other producers is also important. Producers are the most important cattle suppliers. There is a preference to purchase animals up to 2 years, although purchase of 3-5 year male cattle and old cows during the last 12 months does also happen. About half of the traders indicated that the quantity of animals on offer was less than in previous years, while the others thought it had remained the same or even increased. Seventy-three per cent of traders operate only in the Lubombo region. For producers, the mean selling price of cattle is SZL4382.68/animal. Cattle fatteners mostly sell animals on the basis of live weight (in Emalangeni per kilogram), the mean price being 20.51 SZL/kg (USD2/kg). • All existing agreements among the different groups are verbal and the following aspects are considered: time of sale, price, body condition, weight, age, animal health, regime followed, conditions and timing of payments and transport of animal at the time of sale. The majority of respondent groups are willing to be on a written contractual fattening agreement with the other stakeholder. Almost two-thirds of both cattle fatteners and cattle traders accepted to bear these operational costs. The majority of cattle producers prefer sharing the benefits with the traders rather than asking for a fixed amount. • Access to extension services is below 40% and knowledge on the use of suitable feed resources to fatten the animals is limited or inexistent among respondents. Access to market information is high (over 64%); for other farmers, extension services and buyers are important sources of information. • Almost all cattle fatteners and traders have a bank account compared to 70% of producers. Only around half of all respondents have access to credit for livestock/farming activities mostly due to lack of collaterals. Informal sources of credit such as friends/relatives were the most sited source of borrowing money for cattle producers and cattle fatteners. Almost two thirds of the traders declared preferring getting the loan individually and directly from the financial institution.Beef consumption is rising throughout the southern Africa region, providing opportunities on local, national and regional markets (IAASTD 2007;World Bank 2007). A variety of export initiatives, increased consumer income, population growth, and urbanization of southern African countries (growing influence of supermarkets), have increased the demand for quality beef, differentiated by grades and requiring formal slaughter and inspection (Katz and Boland 2000;McDermott et al. 2010;Scoones et al. 2010). This increase in demand should ideally translate to increasing income for cattle farmers including smallholders. However, as production is not market oriented incomes from livestock are low and irregular for many smallholders in the region.The increased demand for livestock and livestock products -livestock revolution (Delgado et al., 1999) in the European Union (EU) markets has also brought about opportunities for countries in southern Africa. The region was able to negotiate a deal with the EU for export of boneless beef under a generous reduced tariff, thus opening new markets and enabling the payment of premium prices to farmers (Scoones and Wolmer 2008). Some southern African countries such as Namibia and Swaziland have been allocated quotas for beef exports to the EU under the Lome's Convention (Sartorius Von Bach et al. 1998).Under this trade agreement, commercial beef producers have been gaining premium prices while smallholder farmers were excluded because inferior quality animals due amongst others to lack access to financial markets, land, irrigation, and production chains. Developing countries have initiated policies that promote, develop and encourage smallholder cattle farmers to produce into a more market oriented way.New opportunities have risen for Swaziland as recently the quota allocated to the country to supply boneless beef to the EU and Norway markets was increased (by 90% for the Norway market), and local demand for livestock products remains high. Furthermore, Swaziland Meat Industries (SMI), the country's only exporting abattoir, is adding more production lines that will focus on processed meat products. This will result in value addition in this industry and will reduce importation of these products. This is another development that may encourage farmers to engage more in commercialization.On the supply side, there are also a number of developments happening that may encourage increased cattle production and commercialization. The Swaziland the Livestock Development Policy provides the policy framework for smallholder farmers to improve their social and economic status through improved cattle production and commercialization. Access to irrigated land by smallholder farmers allow for improved production through growing of forages as well as the use of crop residues for animal feeding from the sugar cane industry. This area is still very under developed with most cattle farmers keeping their animals in extensive systems without supplementation.In 2011 Lidwala Insurance Company introduced an agricultural insurance package targeted at both the small and large commercial farmers. The package includes a comprehensive livestock policy which covers various livestock species. This access to insurance has encouraged commercial banks and microfinance institutions to invest in agricultural production although no particular financial products have been made available to date.As in many southern African countries, cattle is the traditional indicator of wealth in Swaziland and, since prestige is derived from the number of cattle owned rather than their quality or commercial value, overgrazing is rife. Many of the cattle are grazed on communal Swazi nation land (SNL), and there is therefore no incentive to preserve pastures and avoid overgrazing. As a result, Swaziland has one of the highest density grazing rates in Africa, one beast to each 1.6 hectares (Vilakati, 1994). This situation is further aggravated by the continuously expanding areas dedicated to sugar cane production reducing the available grazing area.The subsistence nature of livestock rearing in the country characterized by weak and low investments in the sector and poor linkages of most farmers to formal markets and value addition chains has led to low cattle off-take. According to data from 1998 (FAO), off take is 6.3% for smallholders on SNL which is similar to figures for the communal areas in South Africa (6%) (Scholtz and Bester 2010). Cattle production, and more particularly the beef industry value addition, is of little interest to investors and to the financial sector beyond a small number of large scale producers with strong links to or also owning slaughterhouses, processing and retailing facilities.Farmers generally need working capital to buy inputs and adopt new technologies in order to increase their agricultural productivity and improve the quality of their produce. Access to formal credit from financial and/or microfinance institutions is a key point. Dependency on rainfall and poor farming systems, have been making formal lenders hesitate to disburse loans to farmers for large-scale investments to boost productivity. In addition, a land title is one of the essential prerequisites for loan qualification set by the lending institutions, but which has been denied to most small-holder farmers. Smallholders in Swaziland are located in SNL, thus do not possess a land title.Despite various interventions of supplier-led approaches to credit, limited success has been achieved in improving access to credit, and Swaziland is still searching for better ways to improve access to credit for smallholder farmers. If the aim is to reduce poverty of smallholder farmers and to promote rural economic development, a shift in paradigm to a demand-driven approach in rural financial market is the way forward (Manganhele 2010). In Swaziland, there has been a renewal of interest in improving access to agricultural credit especially for sugarcane and vegetable farmers (Msibi 2009). Cattle farmers are still lagging behind as the livestock sub-sector is engulfed by poor animal husbandry practices, and limited market incentives.Few comprehensive attempts have been made to analyse Swaziland's credit policy for smallholder farmers in order to improve smallholders' access to credit. In Swaziland, smallholders have been targeted in a large number of projects with multiple pro-poor development objectives. In some cases these have been strongly technical and organizational in impact, with somewhat limited power to integrate the value chain to deliver business models that sustain the associated income streams (Wetengere and Kihongo 2012). Many attempts to support the establishment of feedlots or organizing livestock auctions in dry areas have failed mostly because they were not economically viable (grain-fed fattening systems are expensive) or due to the low prices paid to farmers (Msibi 2009).This study is part of an International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) funded project implemented by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) which aim is to enhance smallholders' cattle famers' access to credit form formal lending institutions through the implementation of a viable lending scheme directed to cattle producers, cattle fatteners and cattle traders. The main objectives of this study are to: i. characterize the type of producers, fatteners and traders involved in the beef value chain as well as their production systems and marketing channels; ii. determine the current credit access status of smallholder cattle producers, fatteners and traders; and iii. assess cattle producers and fatteners' willingness to adhere to a contractual fattening scheme with cattle traders and the different modalities that such contracts should include.The study was conducted in the Swaziland Water and Agriculture Development Enterprise (SWADE) project areas, as shown by the green colour in Figure 1, in the Lubombo District about 300 km from Mbabane (Capital city of Swaziland) and in the Hhohho District about 170 km from Mbabane. The study area is located in the lowveld which is one of the ecological zones in Swaziland. This area was chosen because of various SWADE implemented projects: LUSIP; Lower Usuthu smallholder irrigation project-Global Environment Facility (LUSIP-GEF) and the Komati downstream development project (KDDP).These projects allow smallholder rural farmers to have access to irrigated land for sugarcane farming and other agricultural activities and at the same time being able to conserve natural resources and the environment.The mean annual rainfall ranges from 440 mm to 570 mm and the mean annual evapo-transpiration is 2,057 mm. About 70% of the annual rainfall within the hot summer rainy season is from October to March. The mean annual temperature in winter ranges from a minimum of 5°C to a maximum of 20°C.As mentioned in the introduction section, three types of stakeholders participating into the beef value chain in Swaziland have been targeted:• Smallholders, either facing grazing constraints in dry or remote locations (graziers). These are referred hereafter as cattle producers.• Smallholders with access to fodder/feed who are located in irrigated areas 1 but do not have capital for livestock purchase (potential fatteners). Some of these stakeholders have already been involved in cattle fattening activities. We will refer to this group as cattle fatteners , and • Rural cattle traders and those developing small enterprises for rural economic development.Exhaustive lists from the three types of stakeholders have been elaborated from individual data provided by SWADE, the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) and local committees. Table 1 reports the different locations, districts, and the type of actors involved segmented by the gender.From the above list of stakeholders, a stratified random sampling procedure was applied. Random selected samples were obtained from each type of actors leading to a total one hundred and eleven (111) numbers of interviewed stakeholders and composed as: fifty three (53) cattle producers, twenty two ( 22) cattle traders and thirty six (36) cattle fatteners. In few cases some farmers 2 were not available or it was not possible to contact them, in that case they have been replaced by other respondents from a \"reserve\" random list. Socio-demographic characteristics of sampled farmers are summarized in Table 2. Most individuals who own cattle are males this especially the case of cattle producers and cattle traders (this trend is also observed in other developing countries in Africa). Women are more presents when it comes to cattle fattening activities. The average age of cattle producers is 50.3 years, and 51.3 years for cattle traders. Cattle fatteners have the lowest average years (45.4), and mostly females (44%) compared to the producers and traders groups. The term \"farmers\" will refer hereafter to the three types of actors: cattle producers, cattle fatteners and cattle traders.Fifty-eight per cent of cattle producers had formal education and 9% had informal education while almost one third were illiterate (respondents older than 60 years). Cattle fatteners had the highest percentage of secondary school education (36%). Out of all the cattle farmers, cattle traders (14%) had tertiary level of education with 6% of cattle fatteners while cattle producers had none. On average cattle farmers were in-between informal and primary school education level. Data was collected from both primary and secondary data sources. Focus group discussion (FGD) with cattle producers, fatteners and traders were first conducted during the period of October 2013-February 2014 to collect general information on cattle famers' husbandry practices as well as the relationships between the different actors involved in the value chain. In a second step, the information collected through FGDs was complemented by face-to-face interviews with the three types of stakeholders during the period of April-June 2014. Both open-ended and closed ended questions were used in the questionnaires because of the nature of the data that had to be collected from each group of stakeholders. Data that were collected through the questionnaires comprises of each stakeholders' socio-economic characteristics, cattle production and marketing practices, income received from cattle trading and other activities, involvement in contractual agreements and, access to credit. The questionnaires for cattle producers/fatteners and cattle traders are reported at the end of this document in Appendix 1 and 2 respectively.Secondary data were obtained from the MoA, Department of Veterinary and Livestock Services, SWADE, GIS unit from the LUSIP information management system (LIMS) department and the internet using published and unpublished documents.The collected data was coded and entered into excel and analysed using STATA version 13.0. Descriptive analysis was mainly used to analyse the data accompanied in some cases by graphics and figures to a better visualization of the results. For specific variables, cross-tables were estimated to assess possible correlation between these variables.As expected, cattle husbandry is the main business activities for the majority of cattle producers (91%), while for cattle fatteners, cattle production is the main source of income for two thirds of the respondents, and only 41% of cattle traders confirmed that cattle trading is their main business activity.Cattle farmers are generally involved in other agricultural and/or non-agricultural activities (Figure 2). Taking into account that the respondents were sampled from the LUSIP and KDDP areas where sugarcane and vegetable production are the main agricultural activities, 30% and 36% of cattle producers and cattle fatteners respectively depend on sugarcane farming. Due to diversification, 30% of cattle producers depend on other agricultural activities, such as vegetable and maize production. In addition to cattle trading, cattle traders are also involved in other activities such as farming and retailing (mainly as meat retailers).From a list of different items, respondents were asked to specify exactly which type of livestock and other agricultural related activities they are engaged in. Results (Figure 3) confirm the previous ones and what was expected. In fact, livestock producers are mainly concerned with livestock production and cropping, with few of them who are also providing slaughtering services. Almost the same pattern is observed for fatteners who are mostly involved in two types of activities: livestock production and As expected, traders are involved in many livestock and agricultural activities which enable them to reduce risk by diversifying their activities and generate additional incomes and liquidity. These activities vary from livestock production, fattening, transport, slaughtering, up to meat processing and retailing. Almost a fifth of the respondents from the traders' group also indicated that they are involved in cropping. Respondents were asked to rank the three main types of livestock species they are involved with in production and or/marketing activities (Figure 4). The first result is that, as expected, all cattle producers and cattle traders indicated cattle among the ranking of the three important species. This is not the case of fatteners where only 69% of them ranked cattle among the three main important species. In fact, in this group some fatteners have abandoned cattle fattening activities from many years because it was not economically viable. It's important to highlight that all traders as well as almost all producers ranked cattle as the first most important species, while for fatteners this proportion goes down to 72% (from the total number of fatteners' respondents who are currently involved in livestock activities). The second result from the analysis is that more than two-thirds of cattle traders are also trading other livestock species especially poultry, goats and pigs. This proportion is even higher (three-quarter) in the case of cattle producers who also rear poultry or goats, and less (slightly more than half) for cattle fatteners who are also involved in poultry or piggery activities.The mean level of monthly income in other business activities for both cattle producers and fatteners, and cattle traders ranges between SZL1,000-2,000 and SZL2,001-5,000 3 , respectively. The share of income from cattle trading for cattle traders is 40% of their overall income. The high percentage of cattle producers (72%) deriving their income from beef cattle is attributed to the fact that most cattle producers are unemployed, they sell cattle for household income and to pay school fees. But this does not mean that they are involved in beef cattle production commercially. About 28% of cattle producers interviewed had not sold cattle in the past two years. This has led to the encouragement of cattle producers to commercialize livestock production in order to derive more income from the business and improve the economic status of livestock production in the country.Land is the most important asset as the majority of the respondents derived their livelihood from farm-based activities. The area surveyed falls under SNL, which is held in trust for the nation by the King through Chiefs who allocate usufruct rights to individual Swazi families or inherited from relatives. From the results, it can be gathered that the average land size for cattle producers, fatteners and traders interviewed was 3.5, 2.3 and 3.8 ha respectively. This land is mainly used for vegetables, maize and cotton farming. During the off-season, cattle are allowed to graze in the fields. A minority of the cattle farmers interviewed either share land with other family members or members of their association for farming (sugar cane or vegetable production). Assets' ownership of cattle farmers are reported in Table 3. Apart from land and cattle ownership, farmers own a number of assets such as vehicles, plough, and permanent houses. Only minority of cattle farmers from SNL own rental buildings in urban areas. Assets play a crucial role when it comes to access to credit as they are considered as collateral. From the survey results cattle farmers do not have assets that can be considered as collateral when taking up a loan for livestock production because their permanent houses are located in SNL (not considered as collateral), and most of their vehicles are imports (insurance companies do not insure this category of cars).In general, livestock keeping forms part of the Swazi tradition and is still considered a source of social status. From the survey results, all cattle farmers interviewed own livestock such as, cattle, goat, sheep and chicken. For cattle traders, trading activities (number of cattle purchased and number of cattle sold during the last year), was documented and results indicated that almost all the traders (95%) have been involved in cattle trading activities with different intensities. Figure 5 shows cattle distribution among cattle producers and fatteners. Farmers interviewed owned cattle ranging from 2 to 74. The number may not necessarily represent the actual number of cattle owned by the farmer as some respondents were reluctant to reveal their real cattle numbers. The government of Swaziland through the Swaziland Revenue Authority is investigating and exploring ways on how cattle farmers can start paying tax (Times of Swaziland 2014). Cattle ownership distribution is skewed with 41% of cattle producers owning less than 10 cattle while at the other extreme, 2% have more than 60 cattle. The rest of cattle producers fall within this continuum. For cattle fatteners, livestock ownership is almost evenly distributed for herd size of up to 50 cattle. Only 3% of cattle fatteners own more than 60 animals. The composition of the herd size is reported in Table 4. The mean herd size for cattle producers and fatteners are 17.4 and 18.4 respectively with high standard deviations, which confirms the disparity of cattle ownership within both groups. More cattle producers have female cattle than male cattle. Forty per cent of cattle producers own male cattle older than four years (Min=1; Max=9; Mean=3.4), while 22% of cattle fatteners own this category of cattle. Results also indicate that most cattle farmers own young cattle than old cattle, which could points out to a possible increase in cattle fattening activities and a possible slightly higher propensity of farmers to sell their animals.Results in Table 5 indicate that extensive systems are the most common for both cattle producers (all respondents) and cattle fatteners groups (two-third of respondents). As indicated earlier, most cattle are grazed on SNL, which is confirmed by the survey's results. This is also the case for almost 90% of cattle fatteners.Seven out of 28 fatteners (25%) has indicated the exclusive use of stall-feed system (zero grazing), while other cattle producers and cattle fatteners indicated the use of a mixed system where grazing prevail when pasture is available with supplementation of crops residues, fodder and feed during the dry season. Only very few, seven out of 36 cattle fatteners use of industrial feed. This has 2 important implications: first, the daily weight gain per animal will be very low resulting in a longer fattening period; second, it indicates that commercially available feeds are expensive which discourages cattle fatteners to opt for stall-feeding system. This is also confirmed by the low success of the fattening contracts programme established between SMI and cattle fatteners in the past.As previously indicated, sampled farmers are located in regions where access to irrigation water is available, which explains that 60% of cattle producers and cattle fatteners use also crop residues for animal feeding. Sixty per cent of cattle producer and cattle fatteners use also crop residues for animal feeding which mostly entails letting the animals into the cropping areas after harvest or feeding them residues from legume production. There is very limited crop residue conservation taking place. (Table 5). The use of sugarcane tops still very low among farmers albeit this residue of the sugarcane industry is abundant in the region. Cattle producers in Swaziland, as stated earlier are reluctant to sell their animals. This is confirmed by the average number of cattle sold per year by cattle producers which is 3.47 (Table 6). As expected, cattle traders have the highest number of cattle sold per year (more than 37) but the standard deviation indicates that the data is widely spread among the group. Cattle fatteners occupy the second position with around 18 head of cattle sold per year. This could be considered as relatively a low average taking into consideration that fattening activity represents the main source of income for an important proportion of the sampled fatteners. However, the high standard deviation indicates that cattle sales vary significantly within the group of fatteners. Cattle producers generally sell different types of cattle ranging from 1-2 year steers/bull up to old cows, while cattle fatteners mainly sell mature male cattle (3-5 year) which they consider the best animal age/weight to market. Less frequently, cattle fatteners do also sell weaners and young cattle (1.-2 year steer/bull). On the other side, cattle traders' sales vary from weaners up to mature male cattle. They also sell old cows but less frequently.Almost 53% of cattle fatteners did not sell any cattle the previous year, as some of them ceased feedlotting in the year 2009. Almost a third of cattle producers (28%) have not sold any cattle during the last 12 months, said reasons were either stock building or there was no need to sell. Only one cattle trader never sold cattle the previous year because of lack of capital. Cattle producers market their animals through mainly two channels: butcheries or selling cattle to other producers. A smaller proportion of producers market their animals to processors/abattoirs (Figure 6), however butchers remain the first ranked customers for cattle producers. The trend is somehow different in the case of fatteners who also mainly work with two types of buyers: SMI and butchers. Although this result was expected, it's important to highlight the difference between both marketing channels when it comes to the first ranked customer. In fact, around 44% of the sampled fatteners indicated that SMI is their first client, while only 19% of the respondents reported that butcheries are their first customer. This highlights the impact of the contractual fattening programme between SMI and the fatteners. These contracts are verbal agreements that may also exist between fatteners and butchers.As expected, traders have more diversified marketing channels where for the majority of them butchers are among the important customers. A more focused look on the ranking of these buyers indicates that producers (36%) and SMI (32%) are ranked as the first customers for cattle traders which once again highlight the important role of SMI as cattle buyers during the last years.The mean price of selling cattle for producers is SZL4,382.68/animal; this is an average price including all types of cattle being sold by the producers. Cattle fatteners mostly sell animals on the basis of live weight (in Emalangeni per kilogram), the mean price being SZL20.51 /kg (USD2/kg).Traders were also asked about their main purchase channels for cattle. Results indicated that all respondents (those who bought animals during the last 12 months) indicated cattle producers among their suppliers, followed by collectors/traders (47%), and then brokers (21%). Again, if we only focus on the first ranked cattle supplier, almost all respondents (95%) indicated that cattle producers are their main supplier. This result shows the importance of cattle producers within the beef value chain in Swaziland and how vital to get them more market oriented and more involved in cattle business activities. This could be probably further improved if market infrastructure would exist as currently all transactions take place at the dip tanks.Table 7 indicates the type of cattle purchased by cattle traders from cattle producers and the reasons/purpose for purchasing, changes in number of cattle being purchased and reasons for the changes. Almost two-thirds of traders purchased weaners, almost half of them purchased 1-2 year steers/bulls, and one-third purchased 3-5 year male cattle, while only one-fifth (23%) purchased old cows during the last 12 months. A majority of cattle traders indicated that they sell the animals soon after purchase acting as brokers or intermediaries, and more than half of them fatten the animals for later sale (adding value through fattening activities). Cattle trading in Swaziland is not operated as a commercial business, for this reason contractual arrangements are rare and if done it is usually under verbal agreements. From the interviewed value chain actors around 43% of cattle producers, 65% of cattle fatteners and 52% of cattle traders are engaged in verbal/purchasing agreements.Farmers (producers, fatteners and traders) who indicated having verbal agreement with their buyers were asked to indicate with whom they have such agreements (Figure 7). Cattle producers have verbal agreements mainly with butchers and other cattle producers, which in some way confirm the previous results on the main marketing channels (Figure 6). As expected, fatteners are mainly verbally/written engaged with SMI, and some of them have also verbal agreements with butchers. The case of traders is different from the other stakeholders. In fact traders are for some reasons less proponent to have contractual written/verbal agreements with their clients and if it's the case, they'll prefer to stick to few of them. This is indicated by the relatively low proportion of traders who have verbal agreements with butchers: only 45% from the sub-group of traders who have contractual agreements with their customers while previously (Figure 6) it was shown that 82% of the traders are selling beef meat or live animals to the butcheries. that cattle buyers and/or cattle sellers are looking for when buying/selling the animals. Cattle buyers (such as, butchers, SMI, abattoirs , traders and farmers) and cattle sellers (producers, fatteners, traders) agree on the following important modalities before transacting: season (time of year), price, body condition of animal, weight of animal, age of animal, animal health regime followed, conditions and timing of payments and transport of animal at the time of sale. These are the general trends observed for the three studied cattle value chain actors; however it's important to highlight that in few cases, the importance of specific agreements varies among the farmers. For instance, the feeding regime followed is in general an important aspect for cattle fatteners and not important for a high proportion of producers.Generally the following aspects are not very important for the three groups of actors when negotiating the verbal contract: the animal breed, transport and supply of feed (except for fatteners), supply of any other livestock/cropping services or inputs by buyer, agreements surrounding labor or wage, exchange of any consumer goods and transport of animals at any time during growth. It's interesting that results from cattle fatteners are relatively different compared to the two other groups of producers and traders. In the latter case, there is somehow unanimity of responses from cattle producers or cattle traders (the proportions generally range between 70 and 100%) while in the case of fatteners for many responses it's possible to observe quasi-equal proportions (40 to 50%). As the main objective of this project is to provide producers, fatteners and traders with loans to buy cattle and also to pay for operational costs, we were interested to check whether cattle producers and cattle fatteners were able to collaborate with the traders on the basis of a contractual agreement which specifies the technical and operational requirements for the fattening. Table 9 reports the different modalities discussed. First it's important to highlight the fact that the proportion of farmers involved in fattening activities is very low (less than half) and none of the producers reported that he has been involved in such livestock activities. Almost one third of traders have been involved in cattle fattening.The majority of fatteners' respondents started their activity recently (5 years ago) and almost all of them have feedlot premises with varying capacities.The three famer groups have provided approximately the same information about their preferred characteristics for weaners to be fattened and the fattening period. However some differences do exist and it's worthy to highlight them. First, it seems that fatteners prefer buying younger animals (15.2 months on average) compared to traders (17.9 months) and producers (18.3 months). The former are also willing to pay slightly a higher price compared to the two other groups, and prefer selling the fattened animal at around 450 kg weight which is higher compared to the targeted average weight of the other groups. This probably indicates the expertise and experience of the fatteners compared to traders and producers. Interestingly, it's the traders' group who are proposing the highest selling price this is probably due to their experience in cattle trading and the availability of potential buyers for quality beef.When assessing the average daily weight gain (the ratio between the average weight gain during the fattening period by the average number of days of the fattening period) from the results in Table 9, fattener (1.436 kg/day) and trader (1.421 kg/day) groups present the highest average indicators compared to the producer group (1.263). This was expected since that the former groups have some experience in fattening activities. However, these daily weight gains are very high compared to other experiences in Africa and in other developing countries. For instance, in Nigeria, Ayoola and Ayoade (1991) found that feeding a two-year cattle with crop residues supplemented with agro-industrial byproducts (cottonseed cake (CSC), brewers' dried grains (BDG) and molasses) for 120 days resulted in a daily weight gain of 0.67Kg/day. The same pattern was recorded in the case of Vietnamese cattle producers who have grown fodder (forage grasses) and used concentrate feed from farm-grown ingredients (such as cassava and rice bran) to fatten thin cattle provided by the traders and reached acceptable weight gain of 0.775 kg/day for a 3 month period of time (IFAD 2011).The majority of respondent groups are willing to be on a written contractual fattening agreement with the other stakeholder. Two-thirds of cattle producers and more than 80% of cattle fatteners accept to sign fattening contract with traders. Almost three-quarters of the traders are also willing to contract cattle producers/fatteners for fattening activities. These results indicate that the important enabling condition of partners' willingness to collaborate on a contractual and clear basis exists.Cattle producers are on average willing to fatten around five animals per year. Fatteners are willing to fatten on average 10 animals/year while for the traders' group the average is around 22 animals/year (the standard deviation is very high and the median is 10 animals). Generally the three groups prefer growing weaners and/or 1-2 year old steer/bull, although a slightly higher proportion of fatteners (45%) prefer weaners and higher proportions of traders (44%) and of producers (54%) prefer 1-2 year old steer/bull.When asked if they would agree to bear the operational costs of animal feeding, animal health and transport, less than half of cattle producers accepted. Almost two-thirds of both cattle fatteners and cattle traders accepted to bear these operational costs. The majority of cattle producers prefer sharing the benefits with the traders rather than asking for a fixed amount. In the former case, on average producers want to almost equally (48%) split the benefits with the traders after deducting operational costs. Nearly the same proportion of fatteners is willing to share on average 38% of the benefits with the traders. The latter stated that on average they are willing to share 27% of the benefits with the producers/fatteners after bearing the operational costs.These differences in profit sharing were expected since every group of actors tries to allocate the highest profits and also because this type of contract scheme is innovative/new for the different stakeholders involved. In a similar study in Vietnam (IFAD 2011), traders contracted loans from development bank and allocated cattle to producers for fattening. Feeding and labour costs were bear by the producers/fatteners. The agreement stated that the farmers would receive 90% of the benefit of the increased live weight gain during the fattening period. The trader would benefit from trading and receive 10% of the value of the weight gain generated to compensate him for his time and cost of loan (IFAD 2011).Almost the majority of respondents from the three groups indicated that they prefer monitoring the different production and fattening activities related to growth rate, feeding levels and types, and animal health and vaccination. This indicates that both contracted parties are concerned by the fattening activities and want to be involved in order to decrease the risks of financial losses due to poor fattening programme and animal health issues. However when it comes to taking responsibility of animal death, the responses differ among the three groups. A high proportion of cattle fatteners and more than half of cattle traders agree that if the animal dies within one month of the start of the fattening programme, it is the trader who is responsible. If the animal dies after one month it will be the responsibility of the fattener. For the producers' group, the majority of respondent stated that the trader is always held responsible for the cattle death. If the animal is stolen again the majority of fatteners and traders stated that it will be the responsibility of the fatteners, while the majority of cattle producers indicated that the trader will be held responsible of the stolen animal.Interestingly, a high proportion of producers and fatteners accept to share repaying the loan if the fattening activity was not successful. They generally prefer to agree with the trader on a specific amount that will be paid cash. When the three cattle value chain actors were asked what they will do if they have a better offer, more than half of respondents indicated they will stick with the actual contract.Others indicated they will renegotiate the contract and only one-fifth of the producers indicated they will abandon the contract.To conclude, from the results on this section, the general perception of establishing fattening contracts between cattle traders and cattle fatteners or cattle producers is positive and very promising. The majority of respondents are willing to take part to this scheme and want to be involved and monitor the fattening activities to increase the chances of success.Tables 10 and 11 provide information on access to extension services, market information, training and credit which play a vital role in the promotion of livestock production and marketing, thereby improving farmers' income and human capital. According to the survey results in Table 10, the proportion of cattle producers who have access to extension services is relatively low (29%), and slightly higher (42%) in the case cattle fatteners. Access to extension services is one of the factors for successful fattening and cattle production as farmers need the relevant expertise to improve their production skills. Results show that farmers are still unable to access these services. The provision of extension services to farmers in Swaziland is mainly the government's role. SWADE has taken over some of these services as government extension officers have difficulties in accessing the remote areas (limited support in terms of transport).The survey results indicate that cattle farmers have access to a selection of market information sources (Table 10). On average, 64% and 81% of cattle producers and cattle fatteners respectively have access to market information, such as market price information, type of animals to purchase/sell, type of buyers and quality of animals. For cattle producers, the main sources of information are other farmers (including traders), butchers, extension officers (government). While for cattle fatteners government extension officers are the most cited source of information followed by butchers and farmers.Training is an important factor in production and marketing of livestock in any developing country; however, a number of smallholder farmers are still unable to access training as a service. This service is mainly provided by government and non-governmental organizations. As shown in Table 10, almost half of cattle producers and cattle fatteners received cattle production training mainly on the following: record keeping, beef cattle marketing, beef cattle health, general farm management, pasture/rangeland establishment and management, and beef cattle feeding. Access to credit is one of the factors for successful livestock production and marketing as farmers need credit to improve their investment in new and improved technologies and purchasing of cattle. Inability to access credit inhibits production and hence there is a need for the improvement of credit availability. But to access credit from a commercial bank for instance; you need to have at least a bank account. The results from the sampled farmers indicate that the majority of cattle fatteners and cattle traders (around 91%) have a bank account (Table 11). These accounts were savings, investments and transmission accounts. The proportion of cattle producers with a bank account is lower (70%) compared to the other two groups; however, this is still higher compared to other cattle producers in developing countries.Almost half of cattle producers and cattle traders contracted a loan from a bank or a financial institution, and it is also the case for 70% of cattle fatteners. The latter who usually have written purchase agreement with SMI (or other meat processors) are logically more disposed to get the loans. Interestingly the Swaziland Development Finance Corporation (FINCORP), which is a private bank, is the main loan provider for cattle producers (almost two-third of cattle producers who contracted a loan) and cattle fatteners. Almost half of cattle traders who had contracted a loan declared that Swazibank (also a private bank) was their provider. Surprisingly, the majority of the financial institutions named by the three types of respondents are private banks. The role of micro-finance institutions as loan providers for the livestock sector seems very limited. Generally, the loans contracted by cattle producers, cattle fatteners and cattle traders are for livestock and farming activities, although in few cases farmers could contract loans for other non-agricultural activities. Almost half of cattle producers and 55% of cattle fatteners and cattle traders indicated that they got access to credit for livestock/farming activities. But in addition to these formal money borrowing institutions, informal ways represent also an important source of credit. In fact, friends/relatives were the most sited source of borrowing money for cattle producers and cattle fatteners.Traders were also asked if they prefer getting directly an individual loan from a financial institution or if they prefer to get the loan from a traders' association after allocation from the bank. Almost two thirds of the traders (64%) declared preferring getting the loan individually and directly from the financial institution. The rest of respondent preferred borrowing the money from the traders' association.Establishment of farmers groups registered as farmer companies are encouraged in the LUSIP and KDDP area, as this will maximize the outreach of the project. According to the survey results (Table 12), 55% of cattle producers, 92% of cattle fatteners and 64% of cattle traders are members of an association. The main type of association that cattle farmers are involved in is sugarcane farmers association as this was the purpose of the SWADE projects.In addition there are feedlot farming association, maize farmers' association, and savings and credit cooperatives. It is evident from the results that the main benefit of being in an association or cooperative is that of improved income, access to credit, acquisition of new technologies and ideas, collective action and access to piped water for farming and production. Even though there is a national farmers' association called Swaziland National Agricultural Union (SNAU), the cattle farmers suggested that there is a need for a beef cattle farmers association if beef production will happen in a more market oriented way. The aim of this study was to assess smallholder cattle producers, fatteners and traders' access to credit and strengthening vertical coordination for cattle production and marketing in Swaziland. Specifically the study characterized cattle farmers' production and marketing activities, their access to credit, and their involvement into a beef value chain contractual agreement with other actors of the chain.Cattle production and trading plays an important role in the livelihood of cattle producers, cattle fatteners and cattle traders. For cattle producers it's a source of income and it also provide draught power for crop farming. Cattle traders are generally also involved in many others agricultural and nonagricultural activities which enable them to reduce risk and generate additional income and liquidity.Extensive systems using SNL is the predominant production system for the sampled populations, which has not only environmental implications (overgrazing and land degradation), but also affects animal growth as without supplementation it will only produce low quality animals. The existence of irrigation systems, acceptable plot sizes and crops should be better valued by cattle producers and fatteners, by growing fodder and using crop residues as feed resources for cattle.A large majority of cattle producers, cattle fatteners and cattle traders have limited or inexistent knowledge on the use of suitable feed resources to fatten the animals. Although the Swazi government is providing extension services, the proportion of cattle producers and cattle fatteners who have access to these services are low. More work is needed to reach a higher number of beneficiaries.The recent experience of fattening scheme contracts between SMI and cattle producers or cattle fatteners was not successful because of the feeding programme mainly based on grain intakes (high production costs) and also because of the monopolistic position of SMI. Lessons should be learnt to avoid such failures.Written fattening and/or selling contracts are very rare in Swaziland. However, value chain actors have verbal agreements (between buyers and sellers) which specifies the date of selling, the price, etc. The majority of respondents who were involved in this study are willing to be sign written contractual agreement between traders and producers/fatteners specifying the number of animals, who pays the operational costs, the profit share, the payment mode, etc. Surprisingly an important proportion of cattle producers/fatteners accept to share repaying the loan contracted by the trader if the fattening activity is not successful. This is of good notice for further possible implementation of written fattening contacts.The majority of producers, fatteners and traders have a bank account, but less than half of them were able to access credits from the banks or any other financial institutions. The lack of collaterals is the main constraint because the majority operates on SNL which is held in trust of the Swazi nation by the king. Swazi government and the private banks should agree on acceptable solutions that overcome this constraint. In other countries, private banks accept to consider animals as collateral. Currently, informal credit sources such as friends and relatives represent the most accessible lenders. However this is not a long term sustainable solution if there is real willingness from the Swazi government and the other value chain actors to develop and improve the beef sector."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0323152350.json b/main/part_2/0323152350.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..21a74e0d6ca3d868a301f36175403558652ca085 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0323152350.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"17713974159501b8cce9096d9a0d87a9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b4180084-30b4-43c1-b867-6d820ee5a933/retrieve","id":"-1317737154"},"keywords":["tropical forages","improved forages","cultivated forages","agroecology","mixed crop-tree-livestock systems","environmental co-benefits"],"sieverID":"1472bbaf-1107-430f-893d-30b822b4ce03","content":"Improved Forages and Agroecology scale to fully understand the role of forages in the sociological and process aspects of agroecology. We make the case for further genetic improvement of cultivated forages and strong multi-disciplinary systems research to strengthen our understanding of the multidimensional impacts of forages and for managing agro-environmental trade-offs. We finish with a call for action, for the agroecological and livestock research and development communities to improve communication and join hands for a sustainable agri-food system transformation.Livestock are critical for incomes, livelihoods, nutrition and ecosystems management throughout the global South. Livestock production and the consumption of livestock-based foods such as meat, cheese, and milk is, however, under global scrutiny for its contribution to global warming, deforestation, biodiversity loss, water use, pollution, and land/soil degradation. This paper argues that, although the environmental footprint of livestock production presents a real threat to planetary sustainability, also in the global south, this is highly contextual. Under certain context-specific management regimes livestock can deliver multiple benefits for people and planet. We provide evidence that a move toward sustainable intensification of livestock production is possible and could mitigate negative environmental impacts and even provide critical ecosystem services, such as improved soil health, carbon sequestration, and enhanced biodiversity on farms. The use of cultivated forages, many improved through selection or breeding and including grasses, legumes and trees, in integrated crop-tree-livestock systems is proposed as a stepping stone toward agroecological transformation. We introduce cultivated forages, explain their multi-functionality and provide an overview of where and to what extent the forages have been applied and how this has benefited people and the planet alike. We then examine their potential to contribute to the 13 principles of agroecology and find that integrating cultivated forages in mixed crop-tree-livestock systems follows a wide range of agroecological principles and increases the sustainability of livestock production across the globe. More research is, however, needed at the food systemEven though the role of animal based proteins as part of a sustainable twenty-first century food system is a highly debated topic (Meybeck and Gitz, 2017), the livestock sector currently plays a key role in food and nutrition security, particularly in developing countries. Livestock products (meat, milk and eggs) contribute 15% and 31% of the global per capita calorie and protein supply, respectively (Godde et al., 2021). Large regional differences characterize the nutritional contributions of livestock, with low intakes of animal-source food in the Global South compared with excesses in the Global North (Meyfroidt, 2018). Livestock are kept by more than half of rural households (FAO, 2018(FAO, , 2021)), with more than 844 million people worldwide receiving some income from agriculture, and the livestock sector contributing about 40% of the value-added in agriculture (Gontijo de Lima et al., 2015).In general, family farming-often by smallholders cultivating less than two hectares-is still the predominant form of livestock production in the global South, in terms of numbers as well as occupied area (Lowder et al., 2021). On these family farms, livestock production mainly occurs in mixed crop-livestock systems (Herrero et al., 2010), where livestock has a multitude of functions, ranging from the provision of food, nutrition, income and risk reduction to farmers as well as the contribution of essential nutrients and draft power to reduce drudgery and improve crop productivity. The farms are further connected to-mostly local, regional, and national-markets where they generate a plethora of other jobs along livestock value chains (Lie et al., 2017;Bravo et al., 2018;Enciso et al., 2018).In response to increasing demand for livestock products, these traditionally mixed systems increasingly intensify and are thereby replaced by specialized livestock production systems with spatially decoupled crop and livestock production and high levels of resource depletion and/or environmental pollution (Garrett et al., 2017a;Jin et al., 2020). For instance, about 51% of total feed nitrogen (N) in China was imported in 2015, greatly increasing energy requirements for transport, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions abroad, and causing nutrient surpluses in China (Du et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2020). The spatial decoupling of crop and livestock production is further associated with smaller fractions of manure returned to cropland and larger losses of manure N to surface and ground waters and GHG emissions (Bai et al., 2018). Hence, specialized crop production systems increasingly rely on synthetic fertilizers, and have higher environmental costs per unit of crop product (Zhao et al., 2017). Lastly, the proportion of grain-based feed ingredients and thus direct competition with human nutrition typically increases in the specialized livestock production systems. At the same time, their dependence on antibiotics and growth promoters is harmful for public health (antibiotic resistance, foodborne, and zoonotic diseases) (Peterson et al., 2020).Globally, the livestock sector has a huge environmental footprint. It is responsible for emitting 14.5% of the total anthropogenic GHG emissions (Adegbeye et al., 2020), 33% of the total reactive nitrogen emissions (Mueller and Lassaletta, 2020), and is utilizing 30% of the total ice-free land area (Havlík et al., 2012). While large regional differences exist, many of the current livestock production systems in the tropics are responsible for undesirable environmental effects. Expansion of grazing land for livestock is a major driver for deforestation especially in Latin America, leading to about 57% of pasture land replacement with forests over the last decades (Graesser et al., 2015). Overgrazing in pasture and rangelands has resulted in severe soil degradation through compaction and erosion (Martinez and Zinck, 2004), especially in the drylands, with SOC losses creating a large carbon deficit in soils globally (Sanderman et al., 2017). In addition, livestock production is associated with biodiversity loss and high water use (Alkemade et al., 2013;Heinke et al., 2020) Among the most recognized and studied side effects of livestock production related to environmental damage in the tropical areas are: GHG emissions contributing to global warming, deforestation, biodiversity loss, high water use, and land/soil degradation (Martinez and Zinck, 2004;Alkemade et al., 2013;Chirinda et al., 2019;Boddey et al., 2020;Butterbach-Bahl et al., 2020). Widely publicized recent reports, such as EAT-Lancet (Willett et al., 2019), prompted a wave of media outreach arguing that one of the main solutions to the climate change and human health crises, globally, is to eat no or little animal-source foods (Paul et al., 2020a). Although we concur that the growing demand for livestock products presents a threat to environmental sustainability, we question the notion that stopping livestock production altogether is the most suitable or feasible option. Firstly, the political will is lacking and the necessary behavioral change of the majority of consumers is unlikely to occur (Winders and Ransom, 2019). Under these circumstances, it is important to have complimentary strategies that do not eliminate livestock but instead transform its production to reduce the environmental damages from the livestock sector. Secondly, livestock is not only of vital importance for low-income societies in socioeconomical terms, but-when managed well-also plays various complex and often positive environmental and social benefits (Paul et al., 2020b). To reduce the consumption of animal source food could be a valid option for the Global North where diets show an excess in protein and energy consumption, but not for low and middle income countries where most people are under recommended nutrition standards. There, it is, thus, critical to identify sustainable management strategies. These strategies should be applicable to the local context, socially-acceptable, economically viable and avoid the environmental degradation that in the long-term undermines their existence.Agroecology has been put forward as a solution to modern crises such as climate change and malnutrition, contrasting with the dominant industrial agricultural model based on the use of external inputs (Wezel et al., 2020), while improved forages have been proposed as an important entry point for the sustainable intensification of livestock production systems (Rao et al., 2015). This paper takes a closer look at and links up both these proposed solutions. It explores the benefits of including improved forages in integrated crop-livestock-tree systems and investigates the role of such forage-based systems in agroecological transformation. We thereby specifically focus on mixed cropping systems and cultivated forages in the tropics, i.e., crops that are specifically grown as animal feed, be it for grazing or cut-and-carry purposes; and exclude from our analyses the native and naturalized pastures and rangelands.Based on a review of literature and expert opinion, we aim to demonstrate the importance of cultivated tropical forages, with their emerging environmental co-benefits, for ensuring sustainable livestock production based on agroecological principles. In section The Agroecological Framework, it starts by briefly introducing agroecology as (i) a science, (ii) a practice and (iii) a movement supporting the application of 13 principles-and their underlying values-to the design of farming and food systems. The next section, section Ensuring System Sustainability Through Integrating Improved Forages in Mixed Crop-Tree-Livestock Systems in the Tropics, summarizes how cultivated forages have been put into practice by farmers in the global south and how this provides benefits across different sustainability domains and barriers to further adoption at scale. Section Contributions of Improved Cultivated Forages to Agroecological Transformation proceeds by (i) outlining through which pathways and mechanisms this practice is in line with each of the agroecological principles and (ii) assessing to which extent applying these principles is covered in the scientific literature about forage-based livestock production systems in the tropics. Based on field experience and literature review, we summarize our understanding of the mechanisms and pathways through which the integration of forages in animal production systems can contribute or has shown to contribute to each of the 13 agroecological principles. Based on this understanding, search strings were developed for agroecology as a whole and separately for each principle. They were combined with a general search string capturing the integration of cultivated forages in smallholder mixed crop-tree-livestock systems in the tropics (see Supplementary Material). We report the number of hits in Web of Science as a metric for the availability of evidence of this contribution from the perspective of the scientific community. After reviewing the science at the forage-agroecology nexus, section Future Outlook finally identifies critical knowledge gaps and recommends the next steps for scaling up the contribution of cultivated tropical forages to the agroecological transformation of agri-food systems.The principles of agroecology have evolved in history, from agriculture-centered to a holistic food system approach (Gliessman, 2018;Wezel et al., 2020). The most common definition of agroecology, \"the application of ecological concepts and principles to the design and management of sustainable agroecosystems, or the science of sustainable agriculture, \" has recently evolved into an integrated concept bringing the three dimensions of sustainability-ecological, economic, and social-to all parts of the food system. The approach is grounded in ecological thinking where a holistic, systemslevel understanding of food system sustainability is required (Gliessman, 2018). An agroecological perspective on agri-food systems links the nutritional value of food and dietary choices to the environmental and social impacts of food production (Lamine and Dawson, 2018). Hilbeck et al. (2015) write that \"agroecology is neither a defined system of production nor a production technique. It is a set of principles and practices intended to enhance the sustainability of a farming system, and it is a movement that seeks a new way of food production. Scholars thereby agree that the term incorporates three components (IFOAM EU, 2019). First, it is a scientific discipline, studying the ecology of agricultural systems. Second, it has evolved into a set of agricultural practices. Finally, it has turned into a movement that incorporates social justice, food sovereignty and the preservation of cultural identities (Méndez et al., 2013). As such, it operates at different levels and engages different stakeholders ranging from scientists to farmers and communities in the context of the sustainable agri-food systems.As happens with multi-dimensional concepts, operationalization often ends up focusing on one or a few components and fails to maintain a holistic approach. While promoting unidimensional agroecological practices, often mainly technical, still contributes to an agroecological transformation, these approaches are less sustainable as they often lack the sociopolitical support needed e.g., to reverse the power balance with conventional agriculture (Le Coq et al., 2020). Practically, neglecting the multidimensionality of the agroecology concept results in confusion with other concepts like organic agriculture, conservation agriculture, nature-positive agriculture or the more recent regenerative agriculture. Organic and conservation agriculture are based on simple principles around soil fertility management at plot level, aiming at avoiding the use of agrochemical and protecting the soil through permanent soil cover. The two differ in their market orientation, with organic agriculture strongly driven by product certification. Regenerative agriculture proposes a more holistic approach, trying to reconcile agroecology and sustainable intensification under the same banner, but seems to generate just more confusion (Giller et al., 2021). Nature-positive solutions, in turn, are less specific and englobe anything where nature works to address societal challenges, in agriculture or other sectors (Seddon et al., 2021), which includes the agroecology concept. The difference would be that nature-positive agriculture focusses on practices, whereas agroecology focusses on processes. But a common feature between all these different concepts is their meager integration of the livestock component. Until 2015, only 5% of indexed studies concerning agroecology dealt with livestock (Soussana et al., 2015).As the concept gains prominence as a way to sustainably transform agriculture and food systems, particularly in a post-COVID world (Altieri and Nicholls, 2020), attempts to recognize all its dimensions and make it operational have culminated recently with the development of a clear framework and evaluation tool (FAO, 2018(FAO, , 2021;;Mottet et al., 2020). The framework is composed of ten interlinked and interdependent elements: (i) diversity, (ii) synergies, (iii) efficiency, (iv) resilience, (v) recycling, (vi) co-creation and sharing of knowledge, (vi) human and social values, (vii) culture and food traditions, (viii) responsible governance, (ix) circular, and (x) solidarity economy. The first five describe common characteristics of agroecological systems, the sixth and seventh describe foundational practices and innovation approaches, and the last three describe context features and enabling environment (FAO, 2018(FAO, , 2021)). These 10 elements imply a series of requirements for farming system management that can be articulated in 13 principles: recycling, input reduction, soil health, animal health, biodiversity, synergy, economic diversification, co-creation of knowledge, social values and diets, fairness, connectivity, land and natural resource governance, and participation (Wezel et al., 2020). A farming system that scores high in these principles can be seen as transitioning toward a sustainable food system via agroecological transformation. Figure 1 presents a schematic overview of the different agroecological principles at play in a mixed crop-treelivestock farm.In section Contributions of Improved Cultivated Forages to Agroecological Transformation, we assess the role of improved tropical forages as a potential catalyst for enabling livestock systems to contribute to the 13 principles and support an agroecological transformation. As a background, the next section defines improved forages, summarizes documented uptake, the multi-dimensional impacts of this uptake and barriers to more wide-spread uptake.Livestock production in the global South takes place in a variety of livestock production systems. The grassland-based systems, in which crop-based agriculture is minimal, cover the largest areas (Robinson et al., 2011), while most production (i.e., meat, milk, eggs) occurs in mixed crop-livestock systems (Herrero et al., 2010). Cultivated forages include a wide variety of sown or planted grasses, herbaceous legumes, trees and shrubs (mostly legumes) that are integrated in a variety of mixed systems, including intensive or extensive mixed agricultural systems with grazing or cut-and-carry systems, agro-pastoral and silvopastoral systems (Rao et al., 2015). In Latin America and the Caribbean, permanent pastures are the most common use of forages, while in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia cut-andcarry systems prevail.There exists a large diversity of forages allowing adaptation to various production contexts. The so-called genetic improvement of tropical forages is relatively recent and was for several decades relying heavily on the agronomic selection of wild relatives. The agronomic/genetic evaluation of forages has been focused not only on productivity and feed quality but also on tolerance to biotic (insects, diseases) and abiotic (low soil fertility, aluminum toxicity, drought, waterlogging) stress factors. Through this selection from the wild it was possible to identify superior germplasm which resulted in substantial and sustainable productivity gains (per head and per unit area) as well as enhanced resilience (e.g., Peters et al., 2013;Rao et al., 2015;Schultze-Kraft et al., 2018). Recently the importance of bred forages has increased (Jank et al., 2014) and this has allowed attention to specific constraints, where diversity in the natural populations reached limitations in identifying productive, nutritive and stress-tolerant materials. For example, in well-drained environments in Latin America and the Caribbean with a wide distribution of Urochloa (previously known as Brachiaria; Cook et al., 2020) decumbens, resistance to a major insect, spittlebug, became an issue to be addressed by the breeding efforts, while for waterlogged environments there remains a scarcity of high-quality forages (Argel et al., 2007). Bred forages with a combination of desirable traits (e.g., productivity, quality and resistance to biotic and abiotic factors) are also attractive to seed suppliers for targeting specific agro-ecological niches, allowing a greater market differentiation providing incentives for development of the forage seed sector. For example, in the case of crop-livestock systems in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), we see expanding demand for forages requiring soil fertility management and greater attention to environmental concerns. There is also an increasing demand for shade-tolerant forages for silvopastoral systems with high resilience to vulnerable climates with extreme and unpredictable weather conditions. Throughout the rest of this paper we will use the term \"improved forages\" when we refer to forages that have gone through a process of agronomic selection from wild relatives or breeding and selection leading to genetic gain in desirable traits.At first sight, such improved forages seem similar to the high yielding crops such as wheat and rice, widely promoted by the international agricultural research centers in the 1960s and 1970s and adopted as part of the Green Revolution (Byerlee and Lynam, 2020). We do, however, not expect the well-documented drawbacks, such as high input prices, environmental pollution and increased inequality, of the green revolution to re-occur with improved forages. First, the technology in itself differs significantly, with the improved forages not requiring intensive application of pesticides, herbicides and synthetic fertilizers. On the contrary, many have been selected or are specifically bred for their capacity to perform well in marginal areas facing climate variability and change, low fertility or acid soils, water logging, and for pest and disease resistance. In addition, they are being promoted as a component of mixed cropping systems to improve the overall system performance and efficiency in using local resources. Finally, a wide variety of forage species and varieties, including indigenous trees and so-called neglected or orphan crops, are considered for system improvement.Decades of efforts to promote cultivated forages for their productivity and environmental benefits have contributed to widespread adoption, particularly grasses in LAC (White et al., 2013;Baptistella et al., 2020, REDE ILPF ref). It is worthwhile to have a closer look at some successful scaling examples. Maass et al. (2015) estimated that the adoption of hybrid Urochloa cultivars in East Africa was about 1,000 hectares (20,000 households). Labarta et al. (2017) and ISPC (2018) reported that adoption of improved Urochloa cultivars in Colombia, Peru, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Honduras occurred on approximately 7.9 million hectares. According to White et al. (2013), Stylosanthes varieties (from the CGIAR genebank) have been adopted on at least 200,000 hectares. Valentim and Andrade (2005) estimated the early adoption of Arachis pintoi for the Amazon region of Brazil to have reached 1,000 cattle producers and to have generated a gross profit of US$ 4,000 per year per producer. Wunscher et al. (2004) and Lascano et al. (2005) reported a successful early adoption of Arachis pintoi in Colombia and Costa Rica.The benefits of integrating improved forages in livestock production systems have previously been described as part of the LivestockPlus concept (Rao et al., 2015). The authors describe how the sustainable intensification of forage-based systems, combining genetic, ecological and socio-economic intensification processes, increases the efficiency of the systems, has the potential to improve livelihoods, and yields a range of environmental co-benefits-including improved soil health, reduced erosion, reduced GHG emissions and improved GHG balances (emissions vs. carbon accumulation/life cycle), and improved adaptation to climate variability and change. Figure 2 illustrates how forages can be integrated in mixed crop-treelivestock systems and summarizes how this positively impacts on livelihoods and the environment.The relatively wide adoption of improved tropical forages in LAC has convincingly demonstrated their capacity to increase productivity while reducing livestock-related GHG emissions per unit product. On one side, their ability to increase soil carbon sequestration has been demonstrated (Fisher et al., 1994) while the ability of certain grasses (e.g., Urochloa and Megathyrsus) to modulate the rhizosphere interactions through biological nitrification inhibition has proven to reduce soilborne N 2 O emissions up to 60% (compared to similar genotypes without this ability) either after fertilization or urine deposition (Subbarao et al., 2009;Byrnes et al., 2017). Another strategy is the improvement of cattle diets through supplementation with forage legumes, which has the potential to reduce up to 67% cattle enteric CH4 emissions based on a legume (i.e., Leucaena) inclusion proportion of 36% when compared to a grass alone diet (Gaviria-Uribe et al., 2020;Montoya-Flores et al., 2020).In addition to these environmental co-benefits there is a huge body of evidence about their economic benefits. Zooming into forage grasses, the implementation of improved foragebased cattle production systems in Latin America, for example, increases the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 1 by 10-100% compared to traditional grazing systems (Seré and Estrada, 1982;Seré et al., 1993). The implementation of improved Urochloa brizantha cultivars in Colombian beef cattle systems is expected to reduce the producer's risk of obtaining economic losses and lead to economic benefits of US$ 11.3 million at the national level (2022-2048) from which 62.5% would fall on the producer and 37.5% on the consumer. Supplementation by 35% with the forage oats (Avena sativa AV25T cv. Altoandina) in a Kikuyu grass dairy system increases the net present value (NPV) 2 by >100% when compared with a Kikuyu monoculture and leads to an 1 The IRR is a financial indicator for estimating the profitability of potential investment projects. Although the IRR calculations are based on the same formula used for estimating the Net Present Value (NPV) of an investment project, it does not estimate the actual dollar value of the project but the expected annual return. Those potential investments with the highest IRR are generally the ones most desirable. 2 The NPV is an economic indicator that describes the difference between the present values of cash in-and outflows over a defined period of time and is used in investment planning for analyzing the profitability of a potential investment. The NPV considers the time value of money, is used to compare different investment alternatives, and relies on a discount rate related to the cost of required capital for making the investment. Investment options with a negative NPV are most likely not profitable and should be neglected.IRR of 49.9% (Rivas and Holmann, 2000). The implementation of spittlebug-resistant Urochloa hybrids was estimated to have potential benefits equivalent to 43% of Colombia's beef and dairy production volume of 2003 (Rivas and Holmann, 2004a,b). The implementation of different planted forages in West Africa during the period from 1977 to 1997 was estimated to result in an social internal rate of return 3 on investments of 38% over 20 years (Elbasha et al., 1999).Examples also abound around the dual economicenvironmental benefits associated with forage legumes. The introduction of forage legumes in the crop-livestock systems of Nicaragua has proven benefits to tackling degradation and restoring land and soil health. When introduced into the smallholder traditional crop-livestock production system of the Nicaraguan hillsides, Canavalia brasiliensis derived on average 69% of its N from the atmosphere by symbiotic N 2fixation, and increased the soil N balance when used as green manure (Douxchamps et al., 2010). In this case, 12% of the N from Canavalia was recovered in the subsequent maize crop (Douxchamps et al., 2011). However, when used as forage to increase milk yields and annual net income, Canavalia bears the risk of triggering soil N depletion, unless animal manure is recycled. Therefore, biophysical and socioeconomic tradeoffs must be carefully balanced at the farm level to maximize nutrient use efficiency and ensure a sustainable farming system intensification (Douxchamps et al., 2014). Pastures on highly weathered soil in forest margins in Caquetá, Colombia increased dry matter and N/protein yield in farmers pastures containing legumes; because of additional N input via symbiotic N 2 fixation; greater P uptake in productive grass-legume than grass-alone pastures in spite of low plant available P in soils, which likely resulted in greater P recycling (Villegas et al., 2020). Furthermore, the inclusion of the legume Arachis pintoi in grasslegume associations in the same study area doubles beef and milk production and leads to an IRR of between 19.3 and 21.1%, which is significantly higher than for a traditional production system (Rivas and Holmann, 2000). For Costa Rica, grass-legume associations with Arachis pintoi and Cratylia argentea (Rivas and Holmann, 2000) lead to an estimated 30% reduction in production costs per kilogram of milk (Peters et al., 2001). Profitability evaluations in Costa Rica, Michoacán (Mexico) and the Colombian Caribbean region report an IRR that oscillates around 33% for a Leucaena leucocephala-grass association (Jimenez-Trujillo et al., 2011;González, 2013;Murgueitio et al., 2015). The inclusion of Leucaena diversifolia in a Urochloa brizantha cv. Cayman hybrid production system in Colombia is financially profitable and improves all risk and performance indicators when compared with Cayman as a monoculture. This legume increases the Net Present Value (NPV) and the IRR and decreases the minimum area required for generating two basic salaries, the payback period and the risk of obtaining economic loss (Enciso et al., 2020). Also in south-east Asia, forage legumes have proven to play multiple roles, supporting at farm level an increase of N recycling intensity, of N balances and of land productivity. However, the magnitude of the effects there depends strongly on the type of farming system, with more important effects where potential for improvement was high (Epper et al., 2019). While in Queensland, Australia, Leucaena leucocephala has been identified as the most productive and profitable legume, doubling the gross margin (expressed per unit of area), when compared with perennial grasses. At the regional level, economic benefits from the adoption of L. leucocephala have been estimated to be more than US$ 69 million/yr for 2006 in a planted area of 150,000 ha (Shelton and Dalzell, 2007;Bowen et al., 2016).Also tree-based forage species have been demonstrated to have multiple benefits. Pilot sites in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger, for example, show that more successful restoration outcomes are achieved when combining slow-growing indigenous trees or shrubs with fast growing native fodder species for livestock (Sacande and Berrahmouni, 2016). Fodder species have been used to incentivise restoration for example in Burkina Faso (Vinceti, 2020) leading to more resilient restoration outcomes and great adoption of restoration by farmers. Dry forest species can provide critical reserves during extreme drought offering important food and fodder for communities (Valette, 2019). Early effects of silvopastoral systems with improved forages also show improved soil health and increased abundance and diversity of soil macrofauna as documented by e.g., Barros et al. (2003), Lira et al. (2020), andVazquez et al. (2020). Mixed systems with a strong tree component are thus gaining prominence because of their true multiple environmental wins: increased soil quality, GHG emission mitigation, higher biodiversity and improved water use efficiency.As a final example, cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) is gaining increasing interest across the globe because of its unique features that could help alleviate hunger in arid regions thanks to its ability to survive in harsh conditions. This spineless species is not invasive and is used as livestock feed that can improve meat and milk production for cash earnings, while helping to reduce groundwater use through its high-water use efficiency (species with CAM photosynthetic pathway). Furthermore, its evergreen cladodes can provide \"at any time of the year\" high palatable green fodder with a high Ca to P ratio. Despite its low crude protein and fiber content, the cactus pear cladodes are high in water, sugars, ash and vitamins A and C representing a digestible energy-rich feed when incorporated into livestock diets (Rocha Filho et al., 2021). Because of their high-water content, cactus pears also reduce the need for livestock watering. In fact, cactus pear is a very versatile, resilient crop. It is very easy to establish and able to grow on lands where no other crops can grow. Cactus pear is a multi-functional plant that can be utilized to restore degraded land, control soil and water erosion, regulate climate through carbon sequestration, and its fruits and cladodes are consumed by humans (Inglese et al., 2018;Hassan et al., 2019).Even though the research on gender and social benefits has started later, good evidence on positive impacts in that dimension of sustainability is also emerging. A case study from Kenya shows that the adoption of improved planted forages in dairy systems leads to additional roles of women in feed and dairy production and thus more control over the derived incomes from the production system, but also to higher labor burdens, which might affect technology adoption (Lukuyu et al., 2021). Ba et al. (2013) report an average of 50% reduction in amount of labor and time spent by smallholder farmers in supplying forages to their animals in south Central Vietnam. The adoption of Urochloa hybrids and other improved forages in Ugandan pig production systems has led to time savings among male and female farmers (reduced time for collecting feed) and thus made it possible for the producers to engage in other economic activities (e.g., farming, small-scale enterprises). It also changed the decisionmaking structures in the households and empowered women to join their husbands in the decision on which forage to adopt and how to grow and manage it (Lukuyu et al., 2020). In Ethiopia and Kenya, women and youth are increasingly starting to engage in forage businesses, from which they retain income, and which is a promising pathway for women's economic empowerment (Njuguna-Mungai et al., under review).Despite the growing evidence on the multiple benefits of integrating cultivated forages in mixed crop-tree-livestock systems and some successful scaling examples, overall the adoption rates of improved forages remain relatively low, especially outside Brazil and Latin America. Many of the determining factors for the adoption of forage technologies have been studied and include risk factors (perception of risk about future returns from implementing the technology, risk aversion of the producer) (e.g., Marra et al., 2003;van Winsen et al., 2014;Trujillo-Barrera et al., 2016), the availability of commercial seeds, forage establishment costs, the availability of technical information on the establishment and management, the promotion and availability of knowledge about potential benefits and risks (CIAT, 2004;Wunscher et al., 2004;Lascano et al., 2005), labor requirements (Kaimowitz and Angelsen, 2008), farm size and farm management, the proximity to input markets (ISPC, 2018), the growth of output markets (Kaimowitz and Angelsen, 2008), as well as the general access to productive inputs (e.g., fertilizer, manure, pesticides), capital (e.g., credits, payments for ecosystem services, product differentiation) (e.g., Charry et al., 2019), and extension/technical assistance (Ruiz et al., 2016;Bravo et al., 2018;Enciso et al., 2018;Charry et al., 2019), social capital, and membership of farmer groups (Oulu, 2020). Likewise, structural conditions can influence the adoption of improved forages, such as the prevailing extensive nature of the cattle production systems, low land prices (which can lead to an expansion of area instead of intensification) (White et al., 2001), land tenure rights (Kaimowitz and Angelsen, 2008), land speculation (Smith et al., 1997), political violence and warfare (ISPC, 2018), and missing regulatory and monitoring frameworks. When it comes to promoting the adoption of forage technologies, it is also important to analyze and understand how livestock producers make their decisions and how their decisionmaking process is influenced by factors such as trust (in the information provided or in its sources), social networks and socio-cultural contexts (e.g., Jones et al., 2013;Martínez-García et al., 2013;Rossi Borges and Oude Lansink, 2016;Ambrosius et al., 2019;Hidano et al., 2019).As partly demonstrated in the previous section, integrating improved forages in mixed crop-tree-livestock systems is associated with a wide variety of practice changes. These changes include agronomic and animal husbandry practice change, awareness creation, capacity building, and multi-stakeholder engagement approaches to actions associated with the broader food systems, such as waste reductions and dietary shifts. As amply described in the scientific literature (see Table 1), they thereby align well to all 13 agroecological principles.The first principle, recycling, prescribes to use local renewable resources as much as possible and close as far as possible resource cycles of nutrients and biomass. Forages take up nutrients available in the system, including from deep soil layers, and make these available to livestock. This results in improved nutrient use efficiency. More options to close nutrient cycles through animal manure also exist. In terms of input reduction, the second principle, forages are associated with a reduced need for external inputs, such as feeds, agro-chemicals and water. First, they are associated with a reduction of the need for commercial feed/supplements/concentrates through higher feed efficiency and quality. Well-managed high-quality forages can eliminate or minimize the need for concentrates by moderate producing animals, because intensive utilization of forages (cutting or grazing at the right moment of the phenology) increases the production of metabolizable energy and protein per unit of area. Second, they often are associated with a reduction of the need for off-farm manure or chemical fertilizers. This is facilitated through symbiotic N 2 fixation by forage legumes and the use of forages (partly/fully) as green manure. In addition, there is higher availability of on-farm animal manure because of increased livestock productivity (through higher stocking rates and betterfed animals) and increased availability of crop residues for soil amendments as they can be replaced by forages in the feed basket. Third, the use of forages as a cover crop reduces the need for weeding and chemical weed control, while the use of forages with TABLE 1 | Key references describing the contribution of tropical forages in mixed crop-tree-livestock (MCTL) systems to the 13 agroecological principles described by Wezel et al. (2020).Recycling Andriarimalala et al., 2013;Epper et al., 2019;Paul et al., 2019;Dias et al., 2020;Dahlin et al., 2021 A. Reduction of the need for commercial feed/supplements/concentrates through higher feed efficiency and quality: Snijders et al., 2011;Lukuyu et al., 2013;Silva et al., 2017 B. Reduction of the need for off-farm manure or chemical fertilizers: Nyambati et al., 2006;Douxchamps et al., 2010Douxchamps et al., , 2014;;Schultze-Kraft et al., 2018;Boddey et al., 2020 C. Decreased use of chemical weed and pest control: Xuan et al., 2006;Njeru et al., 2020D. Decreased water requirements: Ríos et al., 2006;Nefzaoui et al., 2014;Mayer and Cushman, 2019;Rocha Filho et al., 2021 A. Improved chemical soil health: Fisher et al., 1994;Schultze-Kraft et al., 2018;Baptistella et al., 2020;Lira et al., 2020;Olaya-Montes et al., 2020;Vazquez et al., 2020B. Improved physical properties: Schultze-Kraft et al., 2018;Baptistella et al., 2020;Boddey et al., 2020 C. Increased below-ground biodiversity and biological activity: Byrnes et al., 2017;Boddey et al., 2020;Vazquez et al., 2020 A. Improved animal nutrition: Hoste et al., 2012;Sousa et al., 2015;Améndola et al., 2016;Sordillo, 2016;Nwafor et al., 2017;Mangwe et al., 2019;Mayberry et al., 2020B. Increased animal welfare: García-Cruz et al., 2013;Cuartas et al., 2014;Lerner et al., 2015;Pezo et al., 2018 C. Positive indirect effects on human health: Harvey et al., 2006;Moreno and Pulido, 2010;Rivera et al., 2013;Montoya-Flores et al., 2020Synergy Khan et al., 2008;Descheemaeker et al., 2010;Peters et al., 2012;Cheruíyot et al., 2020;Wan et al., 2020;Zahoor et al., 2021 A. Commercial livestock production: Rivas andHolmann, 2000, 2004a,b;Peters et al., 2001;Shelton and Dalzell, 2007;Murgueitio et al., 2015;Bowen et al., 2016;Schiek et al., 2018;Charry et al., 2019;Enciso et al., 2019Enciso et al., , 2020;;Chizmar et al., 2020;Ruden et al., 2020 (Continued) Pezo et al., 2007;Nakamanee et al., 2008;Gontijo de Lima et al., 2015;Negassa et al., 2016;Charry et al., 2019;Creemers and Alvarez Aranguiz, 2019;Harrison et al., 2019;Mwendia et al., 2019;Burkart and Urrea-Benítez, 2020;Ntakyo et al., 2020;Ohmstedt, 2020a,b;Dey et al., 2021;Neres et al., 2021 Co-creation of knowledge Peters and Lascano, 2003;Pezo et al., 2007;Bautista Solís, 2012;Geng et al., 2017;Dumont et al., 2019;David et al., 2020 Social values and diets Rudel et al., 2015;Gupta, 2016;Charry et al., 2019;Shapiro et al., 2019;Ruden et al., 2020Fairness Calle et al., 2009;Broom et al., 2013;Cibils et al., 2015Connectivity Chakoma et al., 2016;Lie et al., 2017;Lema et al., 2021 Land and natural resources governance Kaimowitz and Angelsen, 2008;de Oliveira Silva et al., 2016;Garrett et al., 2017b;Tapasco et al., 2019Participation Ayele et al., 2012;Lie et al., 2017Lie et al., , 2018;;Bravo et al., 2018;Enciso et al., 2018;Tapasco et al., 2019;Burkart and Urrea-Benítez, 2020 genetic tolerance against certain pests and diseases or the use of forages in the push-pull system replaces chemical pest control measures (e.g., against stemborer and striga). Fourth, forages are associated with decreased water requirements. Increased soil water retention and infiltration is observed as a result of forages used as a cover crop or green manure to improve soil structure and limit run-off and in the case of improved forages established in areas previously covered by degraded pastures. Drought-tolerant and water-saver forages reduce dependence on water for irrigation compared to currently used forages grown in similar conditions.Integrating cultivated forages in the systems enhances different dimensions of soil health, the third principle. The chemical soil health is improved through root exudation or forages used as green manure, through the stimulation of nutrient cycling, soil organic matter (SOM) accumulation, increased soil carbon stocks and sequestration. The physical soil properties are improved as a result of increased soil aggregation, improved soil structure and aeration, increases in particulate organic matter in soil, roots remaining in soil after harvest/grazing, forages as green manure or cover crop, or the use of forages to prevent soil erosion. Below-ground biodiversity and biological activity is increased through increased soil microbial diversity and activity, presence of rhizobia. Diverse pastures (mix of various species) of diverse functions (secondary compounds, root system) improve the conditions for biological activity at deeper horizons, while increased use of tree-based forages can improve soil quality through improved mycorrhizal networks. The integration of forages, with their capacity to sequester and store carbon in the soil and to inhibit biological nitrification, finally, can significantly enhance the climate change mitigation function of the soil.Different mechanisms are at play for improving animal health and welfare, the fourth agroecological principle. High-quality forages (incl. legumes) in the systems improve the overall quality and quantity feeding and thus animal health, amongst others through enhanced immunity and resistance to pathogens. The conservation of forages (e.g., hay, silage, pellets) thereby increases the availability of feed during seasons where scarcity of feed leaves the animals most vulnerable to disease. Forages from diverse pastures (a mix of various species) complement each other in their contents of critical nutrients for the animal and secondary compounds. Some can, for example, be more efficient in utilizing P or pumping Cu or Mg, providing balanced nutrients and secondary compounds (antibloat, antiparasite agents), while recent results indicate that bioactive tanniniferous plants represent a valuable option as an alternative to commercial drugs for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes. Animal welfare is increased in silvopastoral systems. The trees/shade create more favorable microclimatic conditions and reduce heat stress, which has in turn been associated with more stable social/hierarchical behavior. In addition to animal health and welfare, also positive indirect effects on human health have been documented. Improved plant health, including those of forages, under minimal use of agrochemicals improves animal and human health through reduced exposure to chemical residues. Well-fed animals require less antibiotics thus reducing the need for antibiotics and risk of antimicrobial resistance. Well-fed and healthy animals cause a lower pathogen load in manure that can be transmitted through the food chain and feeding healthy forages can reduce feeding of feeds with high aflatoxins such as maize in East Africa.The fifth agroecological principle, biodiversity, can be enhanced by increasing biodiversity across the landscape. Enhancing land productivity, through high-yielding forages, can spare land for biodiversity conservation and prevent the need for further land conversion to agriculture. The introduction of alternative forage species increases the diversity of species and genetic resources at farm and landscape level as compared to grass monocultures or degraded/intensivelymanaged pastures. This can include the use (and in-situ conservation) of local/neglected species. The broader variety of forage species in combination with reduced use of chemical weed/pest control is likely to attract/maintain wider diversity of e.g., pollinators and below-ground fauna. such well-managed pastures increase the natural introduction of native plant species with desired feeding value and resilience to extreme environmental conditions. In silvopastoral systems, the presence of shrubs and trees has been demonstrated to have a positive impact on biodiversity by creating complex habitats for wild animals and plants and harboring a richer soil biota as compared to conventional grazing systems. Cultivated forages enhance positive ecological interactions and complementarities among system components at the interface between the system's soil, plant, and animal components and thus align well with the sixth agroecological principle of synergy. Using for example tree-based forages can help to increase on-farm above and below ground carbon storage, leading to additional climate mitigation benefits. Different mechanisms contribute to economic diversification, the seventh principle. In first instance, forages enable further commercialization of livestock production. Feed represents the highest cost of production in any livestock system and cultivated forages can substantially reduce the feed input costs. In combination with enhanced productivity, this results in increased rates of return and opens opportunities for income diversification with cattle fattening or commercial milk production. Also the forages in themselves allow for income-diversification. Incomegenerating opportunities along the forage value chain include forage seed supply, marketing and distribution, the sale of hay, silage, pellets and timber or fruits in the case of forage trees.Approaches that encourage co-creation of knowledge and horizontal learning used in research and development efforts around cultivated and improved forages include: on-farm variety trials and participatory monitoring and evaluation, capacity building and knowledge exchange activities such as field days and farmer exchanges. These approaches promote farmer-tofarmer contacts as well as more equal relationships between farmers and researchers. This encourages sharing knowledge and skills and triggers innovation in combination with encouraging community-level seed production and \"passing on the gift, \" the existing technology (and associated management practices) scale out quickly.In terms of social values and diets, principle number nine, animal sourced foods (ASF) are an important source of proteins and readily available micro-nutrients, especially important for improving the nutritional status of especially young children and pregnant and lactating women. Integrating cultivated forages in livestock production systems can increase both the quantity and quality of ASF production. The forages also enable the production of sustainably produced ASF, with simultaneous social, economic and environmental benefits.Efforts to ensure the affordability of quality and environmentally-friendly animal products and the creation of opportunities for smallholders, including for women and youth align well to principle ten, fairness. Forages support dignified and robust livelihoods along the livestock value chains. In line with connectivity, the eleventh principle, local feed, seed, and ASF production allow re-embedding food systems into local economies. Actors along the forages and ASF value chains have more proximity and confidence and are better connected to markets. Principle twelve, land and natural resources governance, prescribes to strengthen institutional arrangements to improve, including the recognition and support of family farmers, smallholders and peasant food producers as sustainable managers of natural and genetic resources. Forages create a need for land-use planning and offer opportunities for development of new resource management strategies, for instance to mitigate soil degradation (e.g., fanya juu terraces). Participatory land-use planning processes can ensure the optimal use of land areas that would not be suitable for crops, use in rotation/intercropping/life barriers/under trees and at times promote land use options for carbon-neutral agriculture. In line with the last principle, participation, the Forage community has started to apply a wide array of participatory approaches. Through participatory system dynamics modeling and participation in multi-stakeholder innovation platforms or round-table discussions, farmers can be included in the design of livestock and forage sector strategies. These approaches promote equal relationships and balanced powers between farmers, researchers and policy makers.Between 2005 and 2021, a total of 1,183 peer-reviewed publications addressed the use of cultivated forages in smallholder systems. The most studied principles concerning the forages are economic diversification, social values and diets, biodiversity, and recycling, all illustrated by more than 200 peer-reviewed publications, mostly at farm scale. Animal health renders 126 hits, then the other principles with less than a hundred. Connectivity was the least represented, with only five hits. These results show that the most evident agroecological impact of forages, according to the scientific community, can be observed in terms of market opportunities and income diversification. The high number of hits for social value and diets illustrates how high the topic of animal-source food and vegetarianism is currently on the global agenda. The principle of biodiversity includes particularly papers reporting options to include forages in rotation or intercropping with different types of systems and pastures' diversity. Finally, the capacity of forages to provide options to close nutrient cycles at the farm level was well-documented. The scientific community's interest in these topics has evolved: social values and diets are high on the agenda since 2012, recycling emerged a bit later in 2015, while economic diversification and biodiversity display a sawtooth but generally increasing interest (Figure 2). Besides connectivity and participation, which are both only sporadically addressed, the documentation of the other principles increased during the period 2005-2020, with some promising peaks for animal health and synergy. More research is needed at the food system scale to fully understand the role of forages in agroecology, particularly on sociological and process aspects, which are both at the core of the four principles less documented. This also indicates a yet to be filled opportunity for forage experts to engage more with the agroecological movement and make forages part of sustainable agri-food system transformation. The finding that despite the existence of scientific literature about cultivated forages and each of the agroecological principles, only 38 out of the 1,183 publications in our WoS search explicitly mention agroecology corroborates this action gap.As illustrated in sections Ensuring System Sustainability Through Integrating Improved Forages in Mixed Crop-Tree-Livestock Systems in the Tropics and Contributions of Improved Cultivated Forages to Agroecological Transformation, there is increased research interest and understanding of the economic, social and agroecological dynamics related to improved forages and their integration in mixed crop-tree-livestock systems. However, several knowledge and technology gaps still exist. At the actual technology level, it is important to continue the genetic improvement and identify or develop forage varieties tolerant to a wide range of biotic and abiotic stress factors. Supported by state-of-art genomics and phenomics, this can be done more efficiently and rapidly than before (Chang et al., 2019). Ensuring genetic diversity at forage level provides an insurance with respect to the impact of biotic and abiotic stress factors on yield and quality (Finckh, 2008). Livestock production, however, does not only take place in heterogeneous agro-climatic conditions, but also in a wide diversity in farm systems, and socioeconomic or policy contexts (Umunezero et al., 2016). To guide the choice of forage species and their integration into farming systems more systems agronomy is needed to produce robust socio-ecological niches for various systems that can be scaled (Paul et al., 2020c). This must be combined with increased research investments in the forages-soil health nexus which seem to have remained stable but low, with <100 WoS hits in total (Figure 3).Further research is also required to strengthen our understanding of the multiple interacting impacts of improved forages at the food system level. An increased understanding of particularly the social dimension has a lot to offer, also in terms of understanding the drivers, underlying causes and impacts of changes linked to the productivity, economic, environmental and human dimensions (Rietveld et al., 2021), while our WoS search results show a low coverage of these issues in the scientific literature. Based on empirical data, foresight analyses and farming systems modeling can be used to estimate multidimensional impacts of forages and for reducing agro-environmental trade-offs (Groot et al., 2012;Paul et al., 2020c). In addition to developing context-specific data on the potential trade-offs associated with integrating forages in mixed crop-tree-livestock systems, a better understanding of what drives uptake of improved forages, especially within agroecological initiatives, is needed for guiding large-scale investments and supporting the decision-making processes around that.At a more immediate action level, to ensure agroecologicalbased farming sustainability, there is a need for demand for the resultant products driven by sufficient public attention. To achieve the level of attention that results in changes in policy and consumer demand, there is a need for influential communication targeting policymakers and the different publics. Raising awareness at different decision-making levels should aim to differentiate, label and promote livestock products derived from agroecosystems based on agroecological principles. Concurrently, cultivated forages should be promoted as a versatile and multi-purpose crop through public campaigns (social media, workshops, leaflets, lobbying) (Louhaichi et al., 2018). However, from the literature search (Figure 2) these aspects seem to be understudied which would imply limited innovation in awareness raising. Yet, by highlighting the evidence-based benefits of integrating cultivated forages in agroecosystems, we can increase the visibility of crop-livestock systems and inform the flow of scaling-up investments. In addition, promotional and educational activities, along with results from further research involving farmer participation, in combination economic incentives, such as payments for ecosystem services and the development of inclusive business models, should be further explored (Schultze-Kraft et al., 2018).The environmental and social consequences of the prevailing agri-food system have sparked a lively societal discussion on how to feed an increasing population in a socio-ecologically sustainable and equitable way. In response, agroecology has been presented as a practice, scientific discipline, and socio-political movement that applies ecological concepts in the sustainable management of agricultural systems. Although some literature highlights the important role livestock play in sustainable food systems and specifically agroecology, the prevailing narrative, especially so in the popular media, argues that one of the leading solutions to climate change and human health crises is to eat no or little animal-source foods.In this paper, however, we point out that the narrow climate/diet framing misses the valuable role livestock can play, especially for family farmers in the south. Integrated systems present an opportunity to improve livestock production, support livelihoods, enhance and protect biodiversity, close nutrient loops etc. and forages play a key role in catalyzing this transformation. Scientific literature and documented practice change by farmers indicate that integrating cultivated forages in mixed crop-tree-livestock systems follows a wide range of agroecological principles and increases the sustainability of livestock production across the globe. We, therefore, have reason to believe that livestock production in the tropics based on improved forages can boost the sustainability indicators of this system, moving toward an agroecological transformation of the food system. It is, however, clear that a lot of this promise is yet to materialize and calls for an urgent coming together of the agroecological and livestock research and development communities. The specific role of the scientific community is therein to generate and use nuanced evidence on what is possible and what is not (taking multi-scale trade-offs into account). As part of the overall movement, they can help ensuring that forages gain more prominence in agroecological initiatives and that more investments are made in sustainable agri-food system transformation with explicit livestock and forage components. from the CGIAR Fund to Donors and bilateral funding agreements (https://www.cgiar.org/funders)."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0326521424.json b/main/part_2/0326521424.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f0822cb53e3496a7648b0f5886e3f788f44145a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0326521424.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"eda5efc8693f27e44b3bfe56955be8c2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4bcc5382-df03-46c1-b024-4e407bed4b2a/retrieve","id":"1079755498"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"02412c6b-088c-4019-9f2f-474cadd1d5a3","content":"Cattle play significant social and economic roles in the subsistence production systems of the East African highlandas a store of value, measure of wealth, and source of cash flow, fuel, food, draught power and manure. However, the productivity of indigenous breeds is relatively low, with milk offtake rarely exceeding 300kg for a lactation period of about 7 months. Currently indigenous cattle constitute some 77% of cattle in Kenya, but are more than 98% of the total Ethiopian cattle population. Low productivity is due to relatively late ages at maturity, low genetic potential, heavy parasite burden, seasonal variation in feed and little policy emphasis on livestock development. In recent years, however, policy environments for dairy production have improved, including liberalisation of dairy markets. Encouraging intensified dairying is one strategy of the Ethiopian and Kenyan governments to address the low productivity problem of indigenous cattle and to enable resource-poor smallholder mixed crop-livestock farmers to raise incomes.In periurban Addis Ababa, market-oriented smallholder dairying (MOSD) is based on the use of crossbred cows (CBC) that are fed crop-residues such as barley straw, and natural grass and hay, and locallyproduced wheat bran and oilseed cake. While some CBC's are kept on mixed crop/livestock farms, many animals are kept in the urban centre, and are confined to backyard stalls. Milk is mainly marketed directly to consumers by the producers themselves.In the Central province of Kenya, MOSD is based on the intensification of smallholder mixed farming systems through the close integration of CBC's into the mainly maize-based farms. Cows are fed planted fodder (Napier grass), maize stover, weeds and grass, and grain millings or compounded dairy feed. In many cases where landholdings are small, cattle at not allowed to graze at all, but are instead stall-fed. An important element of this system is the heavy use of the manure to fertilise food and cash crops, allowing sustained multiple cropping on the small landholdings (usually less than 2 acres).MOSD increases dairy production and sales of dairy productsespecially liquid milk, i.e. the milk is treated as a \"cash crop\" resulting to greater market orientation of smallholder farm households (Shapiro et al., 1998). Intensification of dairy production has been shown (Pankhurst 1996) to potentially raise milk production and income, especially where demand and infrastructure are favourable (Staal et al., 1997). Further, since milk consumption globally is seen to grow with income levels, it thus has the potential to improve incomes of smallholder farm households in an economically sustainable manner. Because milk is sold daily throughout the year, more regular daily cash incomes enhance dairy households' ability to purchase needed food items during food shortage periods and hence smooth consumption throughout the year.Under some circumstances in relatively extensive farming systems, the use of CBC as draft animals eliminates the need for draft oxen (and their replacements) required for only a few weeks in a year (Zerbini et al., 1996). Fewer but more efficient animals on the farm could reduce stocking rates and overgrazing, thus contributing to the establishment of a more productive and sustainable farming systems. In other circumstances in more intensive farming systems, where much of feed resources are imported from offfarm and animals are not grazed, MOSD leads to higher stocking rates, yielding more manure and so more rapid cycling of nutrients, again contributing to more productive and sustainable systems.Farmers in the highlands of East Africa have a comparative advantage in dairying intensification because of the relatively low animal disease incidence and conducive climate for cattle rearing. As a result, the region has the largest number of both indigenous and CBC cattle in the continent, good traditional animal husbandry skills, and high demand for animal products.As indicated, intensified dairying has been shown to potentially raise milk production and household incomes. However, the consequences on different household membersparticularly women -are not well understood. In particular, the implications on women's labour contribution to the dairy activity, women's dairy income share and control, and female dairy operators' access to productive inputs have not been well established. In both the Kenya and Ethiopia cases, intensive dairying means greater reliance on cut-andcarry of fodder to stall-fed animals, thus requiring a greater labour input per milk unit produced. Understanding women's dairying responsibilities, access to resources and control of proceeds (products and income) from intensified dairying enterprise is crucial in the sustainable development of MOSD and dairying technologies. This paper therefore seeks to identify the consequences of MOSD on East African (Kenya and Ethiopia) women's wellbeing. We focus on their labour contribution, control of benefits, and access to productive resources and then discuss the implications of these to the sustainable development of MOSD.Data were gathered in Holeta, Ethiopia (some 40 kms outside of Addis Ababa) dairy research project involving the Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organisation (EARO), the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), and the Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute (EHNRI). One of its goals is to develop technologies that enable resource-poor mixed crop-livestock farmers to participate in MOSD. Data from 120 farm households were collected beginning in 1996 from both households with introduced crossbred cows (CBC) and households with locally bred cows (LBC), with gender disaggregation where appropriate. With the CBC's were also introduced complementary dairy technologies. Those farmers with introduced CBC are encouraged to plant fodders such as oats, vetch, and Napier grass, and were trained in improved hygiene and restricted grazing. Veterinary and breeding services were also provided.The data from Kiambu, Kenya (centred some 25kms from Nairobi) was gathered in 1996 as part of a collaborative dairy research project between the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), the Kenya Ministry of Agriculture and ILRI. Some 365 households of all types were randomly interviewed during a characterisation survey, out of which 260 were found to be dairy farmers and owned CBCs. Unlike those in Ethiopia, these dairy farms were not project-established. From the identified dairy farms, a sub-set of 27 households was selected to conduct a more detailed interview on gender-differentiated roles and resources related to the dairy activity.From the same KARI/MoA/ILRI collaborative project, data from eight districts in Kenya covering Central, Eastern and Rift Valley provinces is also used mainly for comparison purposes. These derive from a larger characterisation undertaken in early 1998. The eight districts selected represent a wide range of levels of dairy productivity potential and market access within the Nairobi milkshed.Results from the survey carried out in Kiambu (Kenya) indicate that 70.4% of dairy operators are women and 29.6% are men, underlining the traditionally important role of women in milk production in Kenya. In the male-headed households (MHH), 66.7% of the total of 365 sampled, 61.1% of the dairy operators are women and 38.9% are men. In the female-headed households (FHH) (33.3% of the sample), 88.9% of the dairy operators are women and 11.1% are men. In the larger dairy characterisation survey in Kenya (1998), adult females are more involved in such dairy activity tasks as collecting and processing feed, milking, and marketing of milk in comparison to adult males, children and hired labour as shown in Table 1. However, marginally more men are reported involved in the spraying and dipping task than women are. The above numbers suggest that women are the dominant dairy operators in the intensive, mostly stallfeeding MOSD system of Kenya. These results compare to those reported by Mullins et al. (1995), who found that women supplied 48% of the labour input in dairy farms Coastal Province of Kenya. This corresponds both to women's traditional role as the agriculturalists in Kenyan farming communities, and as the milkers in its pastoral communities. Mullins et al. also reported that although women's' overall work load increased with under MOSD, women consistently stated that they were nevertheless better off due to income increases and stability.In contrast, as evident from Table 2, intensified dairying apparently does not significantly increase women's dairy-related labour in Ethiopia, as a result of which their labour supply to other activities is not likely to change. The monitoring survey in Holeta showed that women's' labour contribution to dairy was only 5.5% in the CBC households, compared to 5% in those with indigenous cattle, a difference which may not be significant. While the household's children provide most of the labour in the LBC households, hired men and children provide much of the additional labour required for intensified dairying. Differences in the traditional roles of women in agriculture and cattle keeping mainly explain the variation in women's labour contribution to MOSD in Kenya and Ethiopia. As is suggested in Table 2, women are not generally responsible for cattle keeping in Ethiopia. Differences in the type of dairy technology employed also explain some of the differences. The stall-feeding dairying technique practised in Kenya is labour intensive, requiring animal feed and water to be carried to the cow. In Ethiopia, on the other hand, MOSD technology includes open grazing, with herding tasks traditionally designated to children (the Holeta site does not include urban stall-feeding farms). The results indicate that adoption of MOSD does not necessarily raise the labour burden to women in the household, depending on traditional roles in cattle keeping and on the specific MOSD technology employed.Earlier studies (Pankhurst, 1996;Walshe et al., 1991;Sanders et al., 1996;Shapiro et al., 1998, Baltenweck at al., 1998) of income impacts of MOSD indicate that cash incomes increase as a consequence of higher milk production and increased market-orientation. The Holeta data indicate that men and women in households with introduced CBC had 14 and 4 times higher dairy incomes than men and women in households with LBC, respectively. Thus, although both women and men benefit from MOSD in Holeta, men's cash incomes rise significantly more as a result, compared to those of women.In Kenya, results from the dairy characterisation survey indicate no significant differences in the net cash flows from the dairy enterprise per household per annum by household headed type i.e. FHH and MHH. This implies that dairy production has the same opportunities for both household types. This appears to be a significant result, in that it indicates quite strongly (with a sample of over 1,300 households) that the income-generating potential of MOSD is equally available to women, in spite of their apparent restricted access to many resources (discussed below). At least in this cultural setting where women are the agriculturalists, MOSD technology offers them important opportunities.The important question to be answered is whether the introduction of intensified dairying causes women to lose control over the income generated. Income growth from intensified dairying is expected to improve households' purchasing power, as well as change expenditure patterns. Such changes are governed by household needs, intrahousehold resource allocation, and gender division of labour and responsibilities. It is therefore important to examine whether intra-household changes in income control exist, and if it does whether it adversely affects women's responsibilitiesparticularly food expenditures.In traditional dairy production practices in Ethiopia, women via the processing and sale of butter and cheese earn 69% of the dairy income. Whalen (1983) notes that Ethiopian women maintain control of this money and spends it to purchase household items. Men and women use the incomes they control to meet different objectives. For example women, by virtue of being responsible for food preparation, spend more money in food purchases than men (Quisumbing et al. 1995). The data from Holeta show that women in households with CBC spend only 4% more on food compared to women in LBC (while their incomes were 4 times higher, as above). On the other hand, men in households with MOSD technologies spend 28% more on food than men in households with traditional dairy production practices. Thus women's incomes increase under MOSD in Holeta, and while they do not appear to spend more on food for the household as a result, men do. The higher expenditure by men on food may reflect their greater effective control over the dairy income in this setting -women's control over that income is apparently low.The detailed survey in Kiambu, Kenya showed women solely control the dairy income in 50 % of interviewed MOSD households, with husbands and wives jointly controlling income in another 25 % of the cases. In male-headed households, wives control dairy income in 41%, husbands in 23%, and both husband and wives in 35 % of the cases. In FHH, dairy income is controlled by either the wife or the children. Even in the MHHs, therefore, women have at least some control of the dairy income in 76% of households, and sole control in 41%. These results confirm earlier studies (Mullins et al, 1996;Maarse 1995 ) that indicate that women do indeed gain an important, if not majority, share of the income generated from intensified dairying. The apparent differences in this regard can again be attributed to differences in traditional gender roles towards cattle keeping in Ethiopia and Kenya. In central Kenya, where women do traditionally have a role in milking of cattle, intensification has led to higher incomes not only for their households, but for their own uses. It may be important to note that, at least in this case, the common scenario of commercialisation leading to more male control of activities and incomes is not apparently occurring.Female dairy operators in Kiambu stated that they would have been more productive, if they had access to financial resources to purchase more feed and feed supplements and also more land to grow forage. This section focuses on women's access to productive inputs and highlights resources essential for improvement of dairy production, not available in sufficient quantities and quality in the East Africa Highlands.The main sources of funds to start stall-fed dairying in Kiambu were through savings and sales of assets in 54.2% and 25.0% respectively, in all the sample farm households. Farmers in Holeta-Ethiopia, were given pregnant high milk yielding heifers at a subsidised price to be repaid over a specified period of time. Farmers in both Kiambu and Holeta do not utilise formal loans because of high interest rates, unavailability and required collateral. Another reason for not taking loans from formal institutions is because of the uncertainty of raising money from dairying with CBC in sufficient quantities to repay the loans. Risks associated in dairying with CBC are animal diseases, unstable dairy product prices and payments, scarcity and costs of feed, etc. The risks of loan defaults include forced sale of land and other valuable asset. Women dairy operators thus do not have the cash to invest in productivity-increasing dairying technologies. Also, female dairy operators typically lack secure title to property that eliminates them from obtaining credit from formal financial institutions, even if it is available. Since women are the main dairy operators in Kenya, their inability to obtain necessary cash and credit may be a constraint expanding MOSD production.The detailed survey in Kiambu found that the average farm size of FHH is 1.86 acres compared to MHH who have 2.26 acres of land. The larger survey over 8 districts found, however, no significant difference between the land size per household by gender of the household head, with mean size of 6.2 and 6.7 acres for male and female headed households respectively, though the standard deviations are greater than the means. This is far much higher than what is reported in Kiambu, where there are higher intensification levels.An important factor that enhances women's dairy productivity is the extent to which they have access to education and training (Overholt et al., 1985). Studies (Lloyds and Niemi 1979;Cloud, 1985) show positive effects of education and training on agricultural productivity. Yet in Kiambu-Kenya, where women are the main dairy operators, 26% had no formal education, 57.8% had primary education and only 15.7% had secondary school education. In comparison, 75% and 25% of the male dairy operators in the same area had primary and secondary schools education respectively. This is also true for the dairy characterisation survey results where 23 % of the female-headed households do not have formal education in comparison to 8 % of the male headed households.Traditional gender differences in household and farm roles largely explain the variations observed in impact of smallholder dairy production on women's labour input and control of resulting income. In Kiambu, Kenya, it was reported that MOSD both increased women's labour input, which was in turn compensated through women's control of most of the income from dairying. In Holeta, Ethiopia, in contrast, women's labour input did not apparently increase when MOSD was introduced, and their income from dairy activities similarly remained small, although in percentage terms it increased. Some of these differences can also be attributed to the different technologies employed in the two locations under study, with the stall-feeding Kenyan system requiring a larger labour input.Evidence from Kenya also shows that access to resources may be a constraint to women's participation in smallholder dairying, even in this setting where women are the main dairy operators and control most of the income from dairy sales. Women will benefit more from MOSD, if they have more access to land for fodder production, credit to purchase needed veterinary services and supplements, and advice of the extension agents on the management skills required for profitable operations of the dairy enterprises. Inspite of the fact that women have resource constraints, dairying with CBC is still profitable. Comparisons of income from dairying between MHH and FHH show no significant differences.The high demand of women's time for MOSD in Kenya may have negative effects on their other responsibilitiescrop production, childcare, household chores and other non-farm activities etc. This hypothesis requires further examination.The hypothesis that market-orientation of smallholders will result in women losing control over income to men is not supported by data from MOSD in the East African Highlands. This is in contradiction to findings from other smallholder commercialisation processes (von Bruan and Kennedy,1994).Clearly, the development of smallholder dairying offers opportunities to improve the livelihoods and welfare of smallholder households and the women among them. Although constraints remain, there does not appear to be the threat to women of losing livelihoods to men through commercialisation, in those cases where women's role is traditionally linked to agriculture and milking. In areas where women's roles are primarily in the household, more change may be necessary before women can capture a greater share of the opportunities offered by MOSD."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0345062610.json b/main/part_2/0345062610.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1c34f160b12329dffa075618df7ed358d9cf5ba --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0345062610.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7a7efffed617e276d98811dcf0691c72","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a2d024f3-a78d-4bc1-9bc7-dfd316e84e9b/retrieve","id":"-1032240365"},"keywords":["genomic prediction","adversarial validation","feature selection","leave one family out","within family genomic prediction"],"sieverID":"080ba2c0-058f-452b-be01-5c71ceb201bf","content":"Genomic selection is revolutionizing plant breeding. However, its practical implementation is still very challenging, since predicted values do not necessarily have high correspondence to the observed phenotypic values. When the goal is to predict within-family, it is not always possible to obtain reasonable accuracies, which is of paramount importance to improve the selection process. For this reason, in this research, we propose the Adversaria-Boruta (AB) method, which combines the virtues of the adversarial validation (AV) method and the Boruta feature selection method. The AB method operates primarily by minimizing the disparity between training and testing distributions. This is accomplished by reducing the weight assigned to markers that display the most significant differences between the training and testing sets. Therefore, the AB method built a weighted genomic relationship matrix that is implemented with the genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP) model. The proposed AB method is compared using 12 real data sets with the GBLUP model that uses a nonweighted genomic relationship matrix. Our results show that the proposed AB method outperforms the GBLUP by 8.6, 19.7, and 9.8% in terms of Pearson's correlation, mean square error, and normalized root mean square error, respectively. Our results support that the proposed AB method is a useful tool to improve the prediction accuracy of a complete family, however, we encourage other investigators to evaluate the AB method to increase the empirical evidence of its potential.Addressing the demands of a rapidly growing global population requires a focused effort on bolstering food production. However, achieving a substantial production increase is a complex endeavor, given a host of challenges. These encompass the depletion of natural resources, the scarcity of arable land, and the unpredictable shifts in climate patterns. Consequently, innovative strategies, such as the genomic selection (GS) methodology introduced by Meuwissen et al. (2001), have become indispensable for driving genetic advancements in vital crops such as wheat, rice, and maize. The application of GS holds the potential to fortify yield stability, increase productivity, bolster disease resistance, and enhance the nutritional and quality attributes of these essential crops (Crespo-Herrera et al. 2021).Genomic selection stands as a transformative paradigm within both plant and animal breeding, capitalizing on high-density markers that span the genome's entirety. Its central premise revolves around the idea that genetic markers can (1) be in linkage disequilibrium with quantitative trait locus (QTL) responsible for a specific trait (Meuwissen et al. 2001) and (2) capture relationship patterns (Habier et al. 2010(Habier et al. , 2013)). Genomic selection is redefining breeding practices through an array of innovative mechanisms, encompassing (1) proactive genotype identification, (2) heightened selection precision, (3) resource optimization, (4) accelerated variety development, (5) intensified selection efforts, (6) assessment of complex traits, and (7) enhanced selection accuracy. In sum, genomic-assisted breeding selection represents a paradigm shift in both plant and animal breeding, reshaping the landscape through predictive analysis and precision driven selection; its versatility and merits position GS as a potent instrument propelling progress and ingenuity in agricultural enhancement endeavors.The challenge of achieving accurate genomic predictions stems from the intricate nature of genomic data and the intricate interplay between genes and traits. While GS holds the potential to revolutionize breeding strategies, the precise prediction of complex traits based solely on genetic markers presents a formidable complexity. The polygenic nature of numerous agricultural traits adds to the complexity, as multiple genes with subtle effects collectively contribute to the phenotype. Additionally, the accuracy of predictions is intricately tied to the quality and representativeness of the training population used to construct prediction models. Inadequate or biased data can lead to suboptimal predictions and hinder breeding progress. Genetic interactions and environmental influences further complicate genomic predictions, as these interactions often remain incompletely understood or challenging to incorporate into predictive models. Consequently, ongoing research, advancements in data analysis techniques, improved genotyping technologies, and a deeper understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships are pivotal to address these challenges and fully unlock the potential of genomic prediction within agricultural breeding programs.In the search to enhance the prediction accuracy of the GS methodology, various modeling approaches have been proposed. These ranges from Bayesian frameworks encompassing the Bayesian alphabet (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC, and Bayesian Lasso, etc.) to machine learning methodologies such as random forest, support vector machine, gradient boosting machine, and deep neural networks for genomic prediction. Nonetheless, mixed models remain prevalent in genomic prediction due to their reliable performance in terms of prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, interpretability, and straightforward tuning processes.However, despite the considerable promise held by GS and the diverse modeling approaches explored so far, translating these concepts into practical implementation remains a complex challenge. This complexity arises from the multitude of factors that must be optimized to achieve high prediction accuracies. The simultaneous optimization of these factors introduces intricacy, often yielding unforeseen outcomes. Consequently, the successful integration of GS into real-world scenarios calls for ongoing research, robust methodologies, and a comprehensive understanding of the intricate interactions underlying these contributing factors. Addressing these challenges is imperative to fully realize the potential of GS and facilitate its seamless integration into breeding programs and agricultural practices (Montesinos-López et al. 2022).Precisely predicting family performance is a cornerstone of effective plant breeding, enabling the maximization of genetic gains, efficient allocation of resources, strategic parental selection, and the tailoring of breeding strategies. Furthermore, it enhances disease resistance, adaptability, end-use quality, and consistency in crop varieties. Accurate family prediction empowers breeders to channel their efforts toward superior families, leading to the development of enhanced and resilient crop varieties with desirable traits.When crossing two diploid organisms, each offspring inherits one allele from each parent, and the selection of which specific allele an offspring inherits occurs through a stochastic process. This process creates genetic diversity within a family, a phenomenon referred to as Mendelian segregation variance or within-family variance. In statistical terms, the genetic value of a quantitative trait in an offspring is composed of the four alleles contributed by the two parents, guided by a Mendelian variable from each parent. Wang and Xu (2019) proposed a mixture model that allows for the dissection of the total genetic variance into between-family variance and within-family variance. With no inbreeding, the genetic variance is evenly split between-family variance and withinfamily variance. When inbreeding is present, there is an increase in the overall genetic variance due to an increase between-family variance at the expense of the within-family variance (Foulley and Chevalet 1981).However, predicting family performance within plant breeding is fraught with complexities stemming from factors such as pronounced genetic diversity, intricate trait architectures, limited family sizes, erratic environmental variations, genotype-byenvironment interactions (GE), data quality and quantity challenges, trait trade-offs, and extended breeding cycles. Overcoming these challenges requires advanced methodologies, refined technologies, expansive datasets, and a profound understanding of intricate trait genetics. Despite these challenges, accurate family prediction is pivotal for the development of superior crop varieties and to address global agricultural challenges.The interplay of genetic diversity, recombination, genetic segregation, population-specific variation, incomplete data, environmental elements, and statistical intricacies collectively underscore the challenges associated with genomically predicting full siblings resulting from a single cross. While advancements in genomics and statistical methodologies continue to enhance prediction accuracy, achieving precise predictions of genetic relatedness remains a multifaceted endeavor, particularly when working with limited data from a single cross. Predicting full siblings from a single cross requires the handling of intricate relationships and uncertainties, further intensifying the complexity of the analysis and prediction processes.As such, innovative methodologies to enhance family prediction accuracy are indispensable. In this pursuit, we explore the fusion of the adversarial validation (AV) approach proposed by Montesinos-López, Kismiantini et al. (2023) with the Boruta feature selection method, as examined by Montesinos-López, Crespo-Herrera et al. (2023). Although the AV method adeptly detects training-testing mismatches and optimizes training sets, its efficiency may diminish when dealing with smaller training sets or moderate to high mismatches. Conversely, the Boruta method, a feature selection technique, effectively mitigates prediction errors by selecting a fraction of the most important features, but may not consistently elevate selection accuracy, since when the selected variables are not optimal, decreases prediction accuracy.Thus, in this research, we introduced the AB method, which leverages the strengths of both AV and Boruta. The AB method primarily functions to mitigate disparities between training and testing distributions without reducing the training set and original inputs. This is achieved through the attenuation of weights assigned to markers that manifest the most substantial differences between the training and testing sets. In the AB method, a binary classifier is trained for each family using a combination of original and shuffled markers. Feature importance scores for the original markers are computed, and these weighted markers are employed to construct a genomic relationship matrix (GRM). This weighted GRM is then incorporated into the genomic best linear prediction model (GBLUP), forming the core of the AB method.We hypostatize that the AB method holds the potential to enhance prediction accuracy and mitigate prediction errors, particularly in cases where a substantial disparity exists between the training and testing sets. Conversely, in scenarios where such a discrepancy is inconsequential, the AB will not affect the prediction performance. This assertion is grounded in the contention that the AB method addresses a notable limitation of the AV method (Montesinos-López, Kismiantini et al. 2023). Specifically, the AV method struggles when confronted with small datasets, either failing to identify an optimal training set or, when the dataset is so diminutive, adversely impacting prediction performance. In contrast, the AB method using all original inputs with appropriate weighting, circumvents these issues. By eschewing the selection of a mere sample or fraction of inputs, as seen in variable selection methods (Boruta method), the AB method sidesteps the pitfalls associated with a suboptimal sample of inputs, which can detrimentally affect prediction performance. We assess the AB method against conventional GRMs without weights (GBLUP), utilizing 12 real-world datasets.The model used in this study can be represented aswhere Y ij denotes the response variable in the environment i and genotype j. E i are the fixed effects of environments, g j , j = 1, . . . , J, denotes the random effects of lines, gE ij denotes the random effects of the genotype-by-environment interaction modeled through a compound symmetry structure, and ϵ ij denotes the random error components in the model assumed to be independent normal random variables with mean 0 and variance σ 2 .Furthermore, it is assumed that g = (g 1 , . . . , g J )where Z E is the design matrix of environments of order n × I, ⊙ denotes the Hadamard product, and Z g is the design matrix of genotypes (lines) of order n × J, G is the genomic relationship-matrix computed using markers (VanRaden 2008). Let X denote the matrix of markers and let M, be the matrix of centered and standardized markers. Then G = MM T p (VanRaden 2008), where p is the number of markers. The implementation of this model (1) using the computed G was done in the Bayesian Genomic Linear Regression library of Pérez and de los Campos (2014).The Boruta algorithm was developed to identify covariates that have significant relevance to the response variable, whether strong or weak. Specifically designed for high-dimensional datasets with noisy features, Boruta addresses the challenges of feature selection in such datasets (Kursa and Rudnicki 2010). Its operation involves the creation of a shadow (permuted) feature set, which is a replicated version of the original feature set with values randomly permuted, i.e. shuffled. These shadow features act as controls to assess the statistical significance of the original features. The determination of the relevance of the original features is based on whether their importance scores significantly surpass the importance scores of their corresponding shadow features.In datasets containing numerous noisy features, where conventional feature selection methods may face difficulties, Boruta proves to be an efficient solution. However, it is important to note that it can be computationally intensive and requires careful parameter tuning to achieve optimal results (Kursa and Rudnicki 2010).The Boruta algorithm operates through a series of well-defined steps for effective feature (marker in our application) selection. The process is as follows:Step 1: A shadow feature set is generated by randomly permuting the values of each feature in the original dataset.Step 2: A random forest model is trained using both the original feature set and the shadow feature set. This model serves as the foundation for assessing feature importance.Step 3: The feature importance scores for each original feature are calculated by comparing them to the importance scores of their corresponding shadow features.Step 4: The maximum importance score is determined for each feature based on the results obtained in Step 3.Step 5: The Binomial test is employed to evaluate the statistical significance of each feature. If a feature's importance score is deemed statistically significant, it is marked as \"important\"; otherwise, it is labeled as \"unimportant.\" The Binomial test is a statistical evaluation used in Boruta to compare the observed number of successes (e.g. instances where a feature's importance score exceeds a certain threshold) with the expected number of successes under a null hypothesis. This test determines whether the observed results are statistically significant or merely due to chance. In Boruta, the Binomial test is applied to assess whether the feature importance scores are significantly higher than those of the shadow features, thereby indicating the relevance of the original features (Kursa and Rudnicki 2010).Step 6: The process outlined in Steps 1-5 is repeated for a predetermined number of iterations to ensure robustness and consistency in the feature selection process.Step 7: Finally, the features are ranked based on their importance scores. Within Boruta, features are categorized as \"Confirmed\" if they are considered important, \"Rejected\" if they are deemed unimportant, and \"Tentative\" if further investigation is required or if they are considered less important. This categorization provides valuable insights into the relevance and contribution of each feature to the predictive model.Step 1. We assume that we have a multi-environment or single environment data set in which there are at least 2 families and for each family there are some lines. Since our goal is to predict a complete family, the information of this family constitutes the testing set { X tst , y tst }, and the information of the remaining families is the training set { X trn , y trn }. Then, in the original dataset { X trn , y trn , X tst , y tst }, we remove the original response variable column { y trn , y tst }, and add a fictitious (new) response variable column { y f trn , y f tst } that replaces the source of the data by 0 (that is, y f = 0) for samples (observations) on the training set and by 1 (i.e. y f =1) for the samples in the testing set (Montesinos-López, Kismiantini et al. 2023). In other words, the fictitious response variables with 0 s correspond to the remaining families and the 1 s for the family we want to predict.Step 2. We then implement the Boruta algorithm with inputs { X trn , y f trn , X tst , y f tst } and we extract the variable important scores (IS) for each marker.A marker weighting approach | 3 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/g3journal/advance-article/doi/10.1093/g3journal/jkad278/7469083 by guest on 08 January 2024Step 3. The next step is to compute the inverse of the IS as Inv_IS = 1/IS, then compute the final weights as w = Inv_IS ×p /sum(Inv_IS), where p denotes the number of markers.Step 4. Each row of the standardized matrix of markers ( M) is then multiplied by the vector of weights (w), in matrix notation we build the diagonal matrix of squared weights, as D = Diag( w 2 1 , w 2 2 , . . . , w 2 p ), and finally, with this weighted matrix, a weighted GRM is computed as G * = MDM T p . The implementation of model (1) using the weighted GRM (G * ) is what we call method AB. It is important to point out that the GBLUP and AB methods were implemented in the R statistical software (R Core Team 2023).The AB method works primarily from its capability to minimize the mismatch between the training and testing distributions. This is achieved by diminishing the weight assigned to markers that exhibit the most pronounced differences between the training and testing sets. In simple words, the weights resulting from the AB method originate from a binary classification model and reflect the significance of each variable (marker) in distinguishing between training and testing sets. By assigning a value of one to observations belonging to the testing set and zero to those from the training set, the weights indicate the relative importance of independent variables (markers) in this differentiation process. In essence, higher importance scores associated with certain variables imply a more substantial contribution to the ability to differentiate observations between the training and testing sets. Also, it is important to point out that the proposed AB method is not restricted only to family prediction, since it can be used for any type of prediction where there is a significant mismatch between the training and testing distributions.Details of the 12 data sets are shown in Table A1 (Appendix).The cross-validation approach used in this study involved leaving one family out. In each iteration, the data from a single-family served as the testing set, while the data from all other families constituted the training set (Montesinos-López et al. 2022). The number of iterations was equal to the number of families to ensure that each family was used as the testing set exactly one time. This method was employed to assess the model's ability to predict information from a complete family using data from different and diverse families.To assess the predictive efficacy of the proposed AB method in contrast to the GBLUP model, three metrics were employed. Initially, the mean square error (MSE) was utilized to gauge the model's prediction accuracy by measuring the squared deviation between observed and predicted values on the testing set. Subsequently, the average Pearson's correlation (COR) was calculated to ascertain the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the observed and predicted values on the testing set. Additionally, the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), serving as another metric for prediction error, was computed. To derive this metric, we first calculated the square root of the MSE and then divided this value by the average of the observed values in the testing set. These evaluation metrics provided valuable insights into the performance of the proposed AB method relative to the GBLUP method in predicting information across an entire family.In addition, we computed the relative efficiency (RE), in terms of MSE, NRMSE, and COR of each model with the following expressions:where M GBLUP and M AB denote the models compared, the GBLUP and the AB model. The RE for COR was computed as:Across the three measures of relative efficiency (RE_MSE, RE_NRMSE, and RE_COR), a value greater than one signifies a superior performance of the AB method. Conversely, a value <1 indicate the GBLUP method's superiority. A value equal to 1 suggests equivalent performance between the GBLUP and AB methods.The results are organized into 5 sections. The 4 first sections present the results for Data 1 (GDM), Data 2 (Maize_1), Data 3 (Maize 2), and Data 9 (Soybean_4), while section 5 presents the results across all data sets under study. For each data set, we compared the results between the GBLUP and the proposed AB method in terms of MSE, COR, and NRMSE. The results for Data 1-3 and Data 9 and across data sets are shown in Figs. 1-5 and Tables 1-5, respectively. Supplementary Material contains results for the rest of the data sets, Data 4-8 (Maize_3, Maize_4, Soybean_1, Soybean_2, Soybean_3, respectively) and Data 10-12 (Maize_Bi_2018, Maize_Bi_2019_D, and Maize_Bi_2019_O, respectively), are presented in Supplementary Tables 1-8, respectively, and displayed in Supplementary Figs. 1-8, respectively.Note that for simplicity purposes, Supplementary Materials only show the description of results from Data 4-8 and of Data set 10 (Maize_3, Maize_4, Soybean_1, Soybean_2, Soybean_3, and Maize_Bi_2018, respectively) given in Supplementary Tables 1-6 and Supplementary Figs. 1-6. Although results from data sets Data 11 to 12 (Maize_Bi_2019_D and Maize_Bi_2019_O, respectively) are shown in Supplementary Tables 7-8 and Supplementary Figs. 7-8, respectively, they are not discussed in the text of Supplementary Material.In this section, we compared the GBLUP and AB methods for each family across traits for the \"GDM\" dataset. The comparison was done using three metrics (MSE, COR, and NRMSE) and for each metric, the RE was computed, comparing the GBLUP and AB methods (Fig. 1 and Table 1).In terms of MSE we found that in 11 out of the 13 families the RE > 1, this means that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method in 11 out of the 13 families. However, across traits and families we got an RE = 1.061, meaning that, on average, the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method by 6.1% in terms of MSE (Table 1 and Fig. 1).Furthermore, in terms of COR, we found that the AB method was better than the GBLUP method in 12 out of 13 families, since in 12 of these families, the RE, in terms of COR, was greater than 1. Meanwhile, across traits and families, the gain of the AB method regarding the GBLUP method was 1.6% since the RE = 1.016 (Fig. 1, Table 1).Finally, in terms of NRMSE values, Fig. 1 and Table 1 show that 12 out of 13 of the RE values are larger than 1, which means that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method in 12 out of 13 families. Across traits and families, we found an RE = 1.033, which means that the AB method gains the GBLUP method by 3.3% in terms of prediction performance. In sum, across traits, RE > 1 means that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method, RE < 1 means that the GBLUP method outperformed the AB method and RE = 1 means that both methods performed equally. In this section, we conducted a comparative analysis of the GBLUP and AB methods across traits for Data 2. The same three metrics (MSE, COR, and NRMSE) were used to measure the performance of both methods. The results are presented in Fig. 2 and Table 2.Regarding MSE, we observed that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method in all six families, with RE values >1. This indicates that the AB method displayed superior predictive capability in all instances. Across all traits and families, the overall RE of the AB method was found to be 1.315, representing an average improvement of 31.5% over the GBLUP method in terms of MSE (Table 2 and Fig. 2).Similarly, in terms of COR, the AB method displayed a better performance than the GBLUP method in all six families, as evidenced Fig. 3. Data 3 (Maize_2). Relative efficiency (RE) between the proposed method (AB with Boruta for variable selection) and the GBLUP method for each family and across family (AF) in terms of a) mean square error, MSE; b) average Pearson's correlation, COR; and c) normalized root mean square error, NRMSE. RE > 1 means that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method, RE < 1 means that the GBLUP method outperformed the AB method and RE = 1 means that both methods performed equally. Relative efficiency (RE) between the proposed method (AB with Boruta for variable selection) and the GBLUP method for each family and across family (AF) in terms of a) mean square error, MSE; b) average Pearson's correlation, COR; and c) normalized root mean square error, NRMSE. RE > 1 means that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method, RE < 1 means that the GBLUP method outperformed the AB method and RE = 1 means that both methods performed equally. Fig. 5. Across datasets. Relative efficiency (RE) between the proposed method (AB with Boruta for variable selection) and the GBLUP method for each family and across family (AF) in terms of a) mean square error, MSE; b) average Pearson's correlation, COR; and c) normalized root mean square error, NRMSE. RE > 1 means that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method, RE < 1 means that the GBLUP method outperformed the AB method and RE = 1 means that both methods performed equally. by RE values >1 for each family. The overall gain of the AB method relative to the GBLUP method, considering all traits and families, was 20.8%, with an RE value of 1.208 (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Additionally, when considering NRMSE values, we again observed that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method in all 6 families, with RE values consistently above 1. The overall RE across traits and families was 1.126, indicating a 12.6% improvement in prediction performance for the AB method compared to the GBLUP method.In this section, we conducted a comprehensive comparison between the GBLUP and AB methods across traits for the Maize_2 dataset with the same metrics. Regarding MSE, our analysis revealed that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method in all six families, as evidenced by RE values >1. This indicates a consistent superiority of the AB method over the GBLUP method within each family. When considering all traits and families together, the overall RE value was 1.553, indicating an average improvement of 55.3% in favor of the AB method in terms of MSE (Table 3 and Fig. 3).Furthermore, in terms of COR, the AB method displayed a higher performance compared to the GBLUP method in all 6 families, as indicated by RE values larger than 1 for each family. Across all traits and families, the AB method achieved an RE value of 1.339, representing a 33.9% gain over the GBLUP method (Fig. 3 and Table 3).Similarly, the NRMSE values exhibited a consistent pattern of improvement for the AB method. In all six families, the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method, with RE values surpassing 1. When considering all traits and families collectively, the overall RE value was 1.203, indicating a 20.3% performance gain of the AB method over the GBLUP method.Regarding the MSE metric, our findings indicate that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method in 8 out of the 10 families, Prediction accuracy in terms of mean square error (MSE), average Pearson's correlation (COR), and normalized mean square error (NRMSE). The metrics that end with_GBLUP denotes the results under the GBLUP, while those that end with _AB denotes the AV method with variable selection using the Boruta algorithm. Relative efficiency (RE) denotes the RE for each metric, RE_MSE and RE_NRMSE were computed dividing the MSE_GBLUP by the MSE_AB, and the NRMSE_GBLUP by the NRMSE_AB, while the RE_COR was computed dividing the COR_AB by the COR_GBLUP. RE values larger than one indicate that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method. Prediction accuracy in terms of mean square error (MSE), average Pearson's correlation (COR), and normalized mean square error (NRMSE). The metrics that end with_GBLUP denote the results under the GBLUP, while those that end with _AB denote the AV method with variable selection using the Boruta algorithm. Relative efficiency (RE) denotes the RE for each metric, RE_MSE and RE_NRMSE were computed dividing the MSE_GBLUP by the MSE_AB, and the NRMSE_GBLUP by the NRMSE_AB, while the RE_COR was computed dividing the COR_AB by the COR_GBLUP. RE values larger than one indicate that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method.with an RE value >1. Across all traits and families, the average improvement achieved by the AB method vs the GBLUP method was 39.2% (RE = 1.392, Table 4 and Fig. 4).Similarly, regarding the COR metric, the AB method displayed a higher performance in 9 out of 10 families, as indicated by RE >1. Across all traits and families, the AB method showed a modest gain of 2.7% compared to the GBLUP method (RE = 1.027, Fig. 4, Table 4).Additionally, the NRMSE metric analysis revealed that in 8 out of 10 cases, the RE values exceeded 1, highlighting the advantage of the AB method over the GBLUP method. Overall, across all traits and families, the AB method displayed a 9.0% improvement in prediction performance, as evidenced by an RE value of 1.090.Regarding the MSE metric, our findings across data sets and families indicate that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method by 19.7% (RE = 1.19.7, Table 5 and Fig. 5). Turning our attention to the COR metric, the AB method displayed a higher performance with a gain of 8.6% compared to the GBLUP method (RE = 1.086, Fig. 5, Table 5). Additionally, in terms of NRMSE, the AB method exhibited an improvement of 9.8% over the GBLUP method, as indicated by a RE value of 1.098 (as depicted in Fig. 5 and Table 5).In sum, our findings consistently found AB method superior to the GBLUP method across diverse datasets, traits and family categories. These results indicate that the AB method is indeed effective in predicting untested families when trained on tested ones.Family prediction in breeding programs is of paramount importance, since it is essential to optimize the use of resources, accelerate the breeding cycle, reduce environmental impact, and produce new plant varieties with improved traits. Family prediction allows breeders to identify and select superior genotypes based on their genetic potential. By predicting the performance of entire families rather than individual plants, breeders can make informed decisions about which families are likely to exhibit desirable traits such as higher yield, resistance to diseases, and improved quality.Family prediction is very important since enables breeders to allocate their resources more efficiently by focusing on families with the highest predicted performance. This targeted approach accelerates the breeding process, allowing for the identification of promising plant varieties more quickly. As a result, resources such as time, manpower, and field space are utilized more effectively, leading to the development of improved crop varieties in a timelier manner. This efficiency is crucial in addressing global challenges such as food security, climate change, and evolving pest and disease pressures.Challenging family predictions in plant breeding can arise due to several factors, which can complicate the process and impact the accuracy of predictions. Some of these challenges include (1) genetic variation within families, (2) quantitative traits and polygenicity, (3) epistasis and gene interactions, (4) recombination and linkage disequilibrium, (5) limited sample size, etc. Addressing these challenges requires a combination of advanced statistical methods, cutting-edge genomic technologies, robust experimental designs, careful consideration of environmental factors, and iterative model refinement. Although genomics and statistical modeling continue to improve the accuracy of family predictions in plant breeding, it is likely that these challenges will continue to be important.For this reason, in this research, a novel method was proposed that integrates the strengths of the AV method and Boruta method and it is called the AB method. This method trains binary classifiers for each family with a fictitious response variable. The fictitious response variable is labeled as 1 (testing set) when the input belongs to the family of interest, while the inputs of the remaining families are labeled as 0 (training set). During the training process with the Boruta method, each original marker and its permuted (shuffled) version is used as input. This process helps determine marker importance. Original markers are then weighted using the inverse of their computed scores, and with these weighted markers, the weighted GRM is computed. The GBLUP model is then implemented using this weighted GRM. From our results we speculate that the AB method is simply picking up the SNPs segregating on the test set. In which case, a quality control process on the SNP set could be used to tailor the model to specific families. The proposed AB method was compared to the GBLUP model that uses a GRM without weights on 12 real datasets.We found the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method between 0% (Data 12, Maize_Bi_2019_O) and 55.3% (Data 3, Maize_2) in terms of MSE, between 0% (Data 12, Maize_Bi_2019_O) and 33.9% (Data 3, set Maize_2) in terms of COR and between 1.1% in Data 12, Maize_Bi_2019_O) and 33.9% (Data 3, Maize_2) in terms of NRMSE. On average across data sets, traits and families, we observed that the AB method outperformed the GBLUP method by 8.6, 19.7, and 9.8% in terms of COR, MSE and normalized root MSE. These results are very promising, since they provide empirical evidence that the proposed AB method can help to significantly increase the prediction performance of complete families.The power of the AB method mostly is attributed to the fact that it reduces the mismatch between the training and testing distribution by reducing the weight of those markers that most differentiate the training from the testing set. This adjustment is possible to be carried out due to the hybrid nature of the AB method that uses the AV approach proposed by Montesinos-López, Kismiantini et al. (2023) for the context of plant breeding to quantify the magnitude of the mismatch between the training and testing sets, followed by the Boruta method to identify those markers that are more important in the differentiation between the training and testing set. Then with the inverse of the importance scores a weighted GRM is built that is used coupled with the GBLUP model with the goal of improving the prediction performance. Our results are encouraging since we not only reduced prediction error (with MSE and NRMSE) but also increases predictive ability (as Pearson's correlation between predicted and observed values) which is one of the most popular metrics used in GS, and that guarantees a better selection process of the best (top or bottom) candidate genotypes. Also, it is important to point out that the proposed AB method is not restricted to only hybrid predictions since this method can be applied to any prediction problem in which exist a significant mismatch between the training and testing set, also the size of the training and testing set have not restrictions, that is, the percentages of observations in the training and testing can be quite different.However, even though the results are very promising, in some data sets we did not find a significant improvement in the prediction accuracy of some families, which in part can be attributed to a not significant mismatch between the training and testing sets and in other to difficulties of building robust statistical machine learning methods for complete family predictions since, as mentioned above, many factors that interact in complex ways affect A marker weighting approach | 9 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/g3journal/advance-article/doi/10.1093/g3journal/jkad278/7469083 by guest on 08 January 2024 the family performance. Also, it is hard to predict some families because the heritability for a single family within a single environment is very low, unless this family happens to be segregating to a major QTL and in these cases, the test is too noisy to validate the methodology.For example, the number of individuals per family (family size) is key to improving the prediction accuracy of a complete family, since the larger the family size, we will have more information to train the genomic prediction model efficiently. In addition, it is key to have many families in the training set since, in this way, the probability that the family to be predicted has more similar families in the training set increases.Also, the size and structure of the training population affect the accuracy of genomic prediction models (VanRaden et al. 2009;Daetwyler et al. 2010;Habier et al. 2010;de Bem Oliveira et al. 2020). Furthermore, incorporating more than 10 individuals within each family will diminish the sampling variability of both allele frequency and phenotypic mean, ultimately leading to enhanced genomic accuracies (de Bem Oliveira et al. 2020). However, we are aware that not even the family can predict itself well because of factors such as G × E (Alencar 2021).For the situation mentioned above, it is crucial to highlight the significance of genome-wide family prediction in breeding practices, particularly considering that numerous species are cultivated within large full or half-sibling family populations, often serving as commercially viable populations with varying degrees of relatedness, as seen in certain forage species such as alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) (Annicchiarico et al. 2015;Biazzi et al. 2017) and ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) (Fè et al. 2016). Within these species, the family unit, whether composed of full or half-siblings, constitutes the fundamental entity for phenotyping, typically performed at the plot level to measure attributes like yield, as opposed to the individual plant level. This approach is required by the allogamous nature of their mating systems (Poehlman 1987). Notably, individual plants hold limited significance, given that commercial varieties are essentially homogeneous populations comprising heterozygous individuals (Poehlman 1987).Significantly, the application of genome-wide family prediction has already been reported in crops that are intentionally bred and cultivated as family pools, particularly in cross-pollinated forage species (Fè et al. 2016;Annicchiarico et al. 2015;Biazzi et al. 2017). For this reason, the proposed AB method is a promising tool that helps to improve the prediction performance of complete families, but still further research is required to be able to improve the modeling process in family predictions in such a way that, it is highly probable that we can guarantee a high prediction accuracy of each family, in any trait and in any data set. The application of the AB method generally improves the prediction accuracy or, in case this does not occur, the genomic prediction accuracy will not be negatively affected by the application of the AB method.Due to the need to improve family prediction accuracy in plant breeding programs, we proposed the AB method that integrates the AV method with the Boruta method. The former detects the presence and magnitude of the mismatch between the training and testing set using a binary classifier using the original features (inputs) and a fictitious response variable, while the Boruta computes feature importance, also using the same fictitious response variable, then with the inverse of the feature importance scores the original features (markers) are weighted, and using them, a weighed GRM is computed. Finally, the GBLUP model is used with the weighted GRM. We found that the proposed AB method outperforms the GBLUP by 8.6, 19.7, and 9.8% in terms of Pearson's correlation, MSE, and normalized root MSE across data sets, traits, and families. The proposed AB method was shown to be efficient in most data sets under study, but for cases in the AB method did not produce any increase in genomic prediction accuracy, the AB method did not produce any decrease in the accuracy of the prediction. Certainly, more empirical evaluations are welcome to support our findings. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0345311188.json b/main/part_2/0345311188.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3abe10c00d37eb15e2db3cc1a814c3e50fc95e08 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0345311188.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e4ba85cf54d27d941a0619fcf7c4d71d","source":"gardian_index","url":"http://www.tropenbos.org/file.php/1344/5_historical_co2_emissions_agus_et_al.pdf","id":"-913318029"},"keywords":["Land use change","CO2 emissions","peat oxidation","low-carbon shrubland rehabilitation"],"sieverID":"06173a91-4d30-4749-b3a1-fbef72cae210","content":"The CO2 emissions from land use change (LUC), peat fires and peat oxidation due to the establishment and operations of industrial oil palm plantations were estimated for the major palm oil producing regions of Indonesia (Sumatra, Kalimantan and Papua), Malaysia (Peninsular Malaysia, Sarawak and Sabah) and Papua New Guinea. Measurements of oil palm expansion were based on the visual interpretation of Landsat images from 1990, 2000, 2005, and 2009/2010 that produced a 22 x 22 LUC matrix, which was used in conjunction with emission factors calculated from the differences in the mean value of published reports for above ground carbon (AGC) for each land cover class (e.g., 189 Mg C ha -1 for undisturbed forest, 104 Mg C ha -1 for disturbed forest, 30 Mg C ha -1 for shrub land, 36 Mg C ha -1 for oil palm plantations). The emission factor for peat oxidation for oil palm plantations operating on peat soils (43 Mg CO2 ha -1 yr -1 ) was based on a review of the scientific literature, while the emission factors for peat fires were based on the assumption that fires were used historically to clear land when establishing oil palm plantations in swamp forest (333 Mg CO2 ha -1 ) and swamp shrub land (110 Mg CO2 ha -1 ).The total area of oil palm plantations increased from 3.5 to 13.1 Mha between 1990 and 2010 at a mean annual rate of approximately 7%. Over this 20 year period, the direct conversion of natural forest preceded the establishment of approximately 3.5 Mha (36.6%) of new oil palm plantations, with the remainder resulting from the conversion of moderate to low biomass vegetation types, including 1.7 Mha of shrub and grassland habitats (17.6%) and 3.5 Mha of land cover types (37.5%) that had been converted previously to field crops, agroforest or other types of plantations, and 0.9 Mha of other land cover categories (9.5%).The net emissions of CO2 from oil palm plantations in the study area resulting from changes in AGC due to LUC, peat fires and peat oxidation increased from 92 to 106 to 184 Tg CO2 yr -1 between the first (1990 -2000), second (2001 -2005) and third (2006 -2009/10) temporal periods. The proportion of CO2 emissions that originated from AGC due to LUC decreased between the first and second temporal period, but increased in the third (55 to 42 to 67 Tg CO2 yr -1 ); the emissions from peat fires linked to LUC tracked those of AGC (12 to 8 to 29 Tg CO2 yr -1 ). In contrast, the emissions from the oxidation of peat from plantations operating on partially drained peat soils increased steadily over all three temporal periods (26 to 56 to 88 Tg CO2 yr -1 ). Emissions from AGC due to LUC and peat fires are one time emissions that occur at the time of plantation establishment, but peat oxidation results in long-term, annual recurring emissions. By 2010, plantations on peat constituted 18% (2.4 Mha) of the spatial footprint of palm oil, but emission from peat fires and peat oxidation were the source of approximately 64% (118 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of the total emissions from land use linked to industrial scale oil palm plantations.Finally, we compared the CO2 emissions from oil palm with the emissions from AGC due to LUC and peat oxidation from other types of land use; emissions from peat fires were excluded due the lack of data on the incidence of fire in other land use categories. We estimate that oil palm was responsible for approximately 13% of the total of these two types of emissions between 2000 and 2005 and 18% between 2006 and 2009/2010, based on total estimated emissions of 698 and 792 Tg CO2 yr -The palm oil industry has grown from providing less than 5% of the global supply of vegetable oils in 1970 to providing approximately 35% of the global market demand (Teoh, 2010). The rapid growth in the production of palm oil reflects the success of a highly efficient plantation system and the inherent productive capacity of the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). The palm oil industry is expected to expand in the near to medium term in response to the demand for vegetable oil as food in emerging economies and developing countries, and potentially, as a biofuel feedstock in North America and Europe. The plantation model of production is widespread and has existed for more than a century in Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia (Corley & Tinker, 2003), but it has reached its most sophisticated level of operation in Malaysia and Indonesia, which together produce approximately 85% of global supplies of palm oil. Indonesia is expected to expand the area under cultivation by about 50%, from approximately 8 million ha in 2010 to 12 Mha by 2020 (Teoh, 2010), while Malaysia is expected to increase its oil palm plantations by only 28% due to the limitation of available land resources (Dompok, 2011). Other areas, particularly Papua New Guinea, Thailand, West Africa and South America also are expected to increase oil palm plantations in response to the demand from world markets.The rapid expansion of oil palm plantations has generated a heated debate about the environmental impacts of palm oil production, particularly as it relates to impacts on climate change, biodiversity and the use of pesticides; social conflicts associated with land disputes and the loss of access to forest resources by local communities have also generate controversy (Panapanaan et al., 2009). The environmental disputes are linked to the widespread assumption that a large proportion of palm oil plantations have been created as a direct consequence of forest clearing. This assumption is challenged by the palm oil industry that asserts that most existing oil pam plantations have been established on lands that were degraded forest, shrub land and rubber plantations (Smith, 2011). Recent studies from Indonesia provide evidence that land cover is dynamic and complex. Deforestation has been associated with the expansion of plantation estates and cropland; however, agroforest landscapes where coffee, cacao, citrus and timber are grown as part of a diversified smallholder production system have decreased gradually since 1990 and so are also likely to be involved. Simultaneously, the loss of forest cover has been linked with the increase in shrub land between 1990 and 2000, presumably due to forest degradation, but this type of land cover decreased between 2000 and 2005, as it was converted to more productive types of land use including oil pam (Ekadinata & Dewi, 2011).Several studies documenting deforestation have been completed for both Malaysia and Indonesia (Stibig & Malingrea, 2003;Hansen et al., 2009;Miettinen et al., 2011Miettinen et al., , 2012a) ) and both governments provide periodic reports to the global database on forest resources (FAO, 2010). However, detailed studies that quantify land use change (LUC) specific for the palm oil sector are nonexistent or incomplete. In Indonesia, Ekadinata & Dewi (2011) analyzed land cover changes for two temporal periods: 1990 -2000 and 2001 -2005, but treated all types of industrial plantations as a single category, including oil palm, pulp and paper and rubber. Similarly, the Indonesian Ministry of Forestry (MoF, 2008) analyzed land use change for 2000 -2003 and 2004 -2006 and likewise grouped all plantation types into a single category (see WRI, 2008). In Malaysia, a variety of government institutions have tracked forest cover and land use change and have provided detailed information on the expansion of oil palm plantations and changes in forest cover; unfortunately, those studies use different data sources and classification methodologies and lack consistency in the definition of forest between temporal benchmarks making the palm industry in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea Reports from the Technical Panels of the 2 nd Greenhouse Gas Working Group of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) 67 estimates of change between oil palm expansion and deforestation difficult to verify (Rashid et al., 2013 -this publication). The most widely cited estimate of deforestation attributed to oil palm plantations is based on a reinterpretation of the national reports provided by government ministries to the Forest Resource Assessment program of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2010) covering the period between 1990 and 2005.This information has been reinterpreted to provide an estimate that approximately 55 -59% of oil palm expansion in Malaysia and Indonesia has occurred at the expense of forests (Koh & Wilcove, 2008). It is important to note, however, that this conclusion is based on secondary sources unverified by remote sensing studies, and the FAO database is not considered to be reliable for many tropical forest countries by some remote sensing scientists (Grainger, 2007;Olander et al., 2008).The controversies surrounding CO2 emissions and land use are compounded by the uncertainty in the dimensions and variability of above and below ground carbon stocks in natural, degraded, and anthropogenic landscapes. This uncertainty is a function of the variability inherent in any natural ecosystem (Saatchi et al., 2011) and the temporal changes that occur as one class transitions into another (Lambin et al., 2003). Land use change may be abrupt in the case of the conversion of forest habitat to a plantation estate or gradual when primary forest is logged, logged again, and exposed to wildfire prior to its conversion to agriculture. Moreover, the identification of transitional categories is subject to the time span used for the study; for example, a temporal comparison spanning a decade or longer will often document a transition from undisturbed forest to plantation, but a multi-temporal study with shorter periods might reveal that undisturbed forest first become degraded forest and then shrub land, prior to its conversion to some form of productive activity. In addition, the selection of carbon stock values can greatly impact the estimates of net CO2 emissions, particularly in light of the capacity for plantation landscapes to capture and store significant amounts of carbon (Wautersa et al., 2008;Henson, 2009).Another major controversy is related to the conversion of coastal peat swamps to plantation estates; this type of production strategy requires the partial drainage of these wetland habitats, which leads to the oxidation of peat and the emission of CO2. Drainage and oxidation causes the peat soils to subside and reduces their capacity to regulate the surrounding hydrology; if the process continues, the underlying mineral soil layer will eventually become exposed or, more likely, the subsidence will approximate the level in adjacent coastal water bodies that are often chemically saline (Hooijer et al., 2010). The dimensions of CO2 emissions from drained and converted peat swamps are subject to numerous uncertainties and have been a source of contention over the last decade. Estimates of the emission from peat oxidation vary widely, ranging from a low of 26 Mg CO2 ha -1 yr -1 (Jauhiainen et al., 2001) in agricultural land to a high of 100 Mg CO2 ha -1 yr -1 in oil palm plantations (Hooijer et al., 2012;Page et al., 2011). The uncertainty in these estimates is related to both the physical nature of tropical peat and a lack of studies that adequately address the natural sources of variability, as well as disagreements among soil scientists on how to directly measure CO2 emissions and the components of a modelling approach that estimates emissions in the absence of direct measurements (Melling et al., 2005;Hooijer et al., 2010;2012;Agus et al., 2012).This paper seeks to clarify some of the uncertainties outlined in the previous paragraphs and provide a more robust estimate of CO2 emissions linked to land use change caused by the palm oil sector. To do this, we documented the full trajectory of the conversion of forest landscapes to oil palm plantations, as well as evaluating how other land cover types have contributed to the expansion of the oil palm plantations. Our primary goal is to provide an objective estimate of the CO2 emissions from the establishment of new oil palm plantations and to model the emissions from plantations established on peat soils. As part of that process, we provide estimates of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions linked to other productive sectors and place the emissions directly linked to palm oil in the broader context of land cover and land use change.This paper represents a synthesis of information that comes largely from two different sources:1) An original analysis of land cover and land cover change for two decades for the principal palm oil producing regions in Indonesia (Sumatra and Kalimantan) and Malaysia (Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak), as well as the regions most likely to be the focus for future palm oil expansion (Indonesian Papua and Papua New Guinea) (Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). 2) A review of the published literature of carbon stock values for above and below ground biomass for these same geographies and a critical evaluation of the range of values reported for CO2 emission from peat and the underlying assumptions that are used when estimating them (Agus et al., 2013 -this publication).The spatial extent and expansion of oil palm estates was documented for three temporal periods (1990 -2000, 2001 -2005 and 2006 -2009/2010) based on a visual interpretation of Landsat satellite images (Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication).The land cover stratification is composed of 22 classes, which was based on a harmonization of two similar systems used by the Ministry of Forestry (21 classes) and the Ministry of the Agriculture (23 classes) of the Republic of Indonesia (Table 1). The same system was used for the Malaysian states and Papua New Guinea to ensure uniform criteria for all regions (see Table 1 - Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). Experienced GIS technicians visually identified similar groups of pixels based on spectral attributes, geometric patterns, and landscape context to digitally trace polygons on the computer screen. Land use change between each of the different land cover categories was documented and summarized via a 22 x 22 land use change matrix for each temporal period and for each sub-region included in the study. The results were pooled using aggregate categories to facilitate the communication of the results (see first column in Table 1). Above ground carbon (AGC) can be either a source or sink of atmospheric CO2 depending on the difference between the carbon stock of the land prior to and after land use change (LUC). The emission factors from changes in AGC due to LUC are the differences between the mean values of published reports of the carbon stocks for each of the 22 land cover types listed in Table 1 (see review by Agus et al., 2013 -this publication). The variability in the above ground carbon of forest and shrub land vegetation types is due to the interactions of biodiversity and ecological processes, as well as human disturbance from logging and fire. In contrast, crop land and plantation estates are characterized by simple vegetation structure and uniform planting density. Nonetheless, published reports for the carbon stock of oil palm plantations vary by as much as 50%, because different studies include or exclude below ground biomass, ground vegetation, litter and persistent leaf bases that represent short-term carbon pools. The value of 36 Mg ha -1 adopted in this study is the mean of several studies that estimate the time-averaged carbon stock of an oil palm plantation that starts near zero to reach more than 155 Mg C ha -1 for a 25-yr old plantation (see Agus et al., 2013 -this publication). In the case of bare soils, a transitional category of uncertain origin, we use a value of 36 Mg ha -1 as default carbon stock value in order to avoid introducing artifacts into estimates of oil palm emissions. Similarly, obvious errors in land cover classification that produced illogical land use change outcomes (e.g., apparent conversion of water bodies to oil palm) were excluded from the analysis. The decomposition of peat, also known as peat oxidation, is the most important source of CO2 emission in oil palm plantations operating on peat soils. Upon partial drainage and conversion, the functional attributes of peat soils change from being a net sink to become a net source of CO2 (Hooijer et al. 2006;Agus & Subiksa 2008;Agus et al., 2012). The rate of emission is primarily a function of the depth of drainage, but other factors such as local climate and peat maturity also influence the rate of decomposition. Estimates of CO2 emissions from peat oxidation under different conditions remain uncertain, in part due the difficulty of distinguishing between the autotrophic respiration from roots and the heterotrophic respiration from the soil biota that mediates decomposition (see review by Agus et al., 2013 -this publication). We used as a basis the emission factor of 0.91 Mg CO2 ha -1 cm -1 (Hooijer et al. 2010), but modified that value by a coefficient of 0.79 to correct for the root-related emission based on the studies by Jauhiainen et al. (2012). In our model, we assume that oil palm plantations on peat soils have a mean water table depth between 50 and 70 cm, which generates emission estimates between 36 to 50 Mg CO2 ha -1 yr -1 with an average value of 43 Mg CO2 ha -1 yr -1 .Peat fires are another major source of CO2 emissions linked to the cultivation of oil palm on peat. Although the use of fire is on the decline, it was a common management practice throughout the temporal periods described in this study (Schrier-Uijl et al., 2013 -this publication). Peat soils must be drained prior to plantation establishment, but the depth of the water table and the degree of soil dryness varies widely across years: When peat soils are dry, they catch fire and burn. The depth of peat fires range from more than 50 cm during severe drought, such as the mega El Niño event of 1997/98 (Page et al. 2002), to zero during unusually wet years. We assume that when swamp forest is converted to oil palm, an average of 15 cm of peat is consumed by fire and, because fire is less intense when shrub land is cleared, an average of only 5 cm of peat is lost. In both cases, we assume that peat has a mean carbon content of 0.06 Mg m -3 . This combination of peat depth and carbon density were used to calculate an emission factor of 330 Mg CO2 ha -1 for plantations established on forest landscapes and 110 Mg CO2 ha -1 on shrub land (Agus et al., 2012;2013 -this publication). We assume that fire has not been used and there were no emissions when oil palm plantation were established on cropland, agroforest, other types of plantation or any of the miscellaneous land cover categories. In the case of bare soil, in those areas where this land cover class was documented as being an integral part of the oil palm land use dynamic (Peninsular Malaysia and Sarawak), we treated that proportion of bare soil area as oil palm plantations according to the relative area of bare soils that had been planted to oil palm in the previous temporal period.The estimate of the net carbon emissions was based on IPCC ( 2006):Activity data is the area under specific land use or undergoing land use change (LUC) within a defined period of time. The Activity data is based on the 22 x 22 LUC matrix for each subregion for each period at national or sub-national level. Emission factor is the change in carbon stock in every major pool or emission rate in case of peat oxidation. The net emission can be calculated as:where E is net CO2 emission, Ea is emission from AGC due to LUC, Sa is sequestration of CO2 from the atmosphere into crop biomass of the succeeding land uses, Ebo is emission from below ground soil organic matter decomposition (peat oxidation), and Epf is emission due to peat fire.Emissions from AGC due to LUC are calculated based on carbon stock change: The coefficient 44/12 or 3.67 is the conversion factor from C to CO2, based on atomic weights of C and O of 12 and 16, respectively, t is the period (number of years) of analysis and A is the activity data or area of land use. Quantitative information are expressed using the standard prefixes of the International System of Units (SI): a metric ton is Mg (g x10 6 ), a million metric tons is Tg (g x10 12 ) and a million hectares is Mha (ha x10 6 ).The total land surface dedicated to the cultivation of oil palm has increased dramatically in Southeast Asia expanding from 3.5 Mha in 1990 to more than 13.1 Mha in 2009/2010 (Table 2); much of that expansion has occurred at the expense of forest. When summed over all regions and for all three temporal periods, forest landscapes were the source of approximately 36.6% of all new oil palm plantations: 25.4% from upland forest and 11% from swamp forests, including both undisturbed and disturbed forest (see Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). The comparison of soil and land cover maps show the proportion of all oil palm plantations on peat soils at approximately 2.4 Mha in 2009/2010, representing about 18% of all plantations in the study area (see Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). The mean rate of expansion has increased from approximately 373,000 in the 1990s to more than 735,000 ha yr -1 in the last temporal period, maintaining an annual growth of approximately 7% over two decades (Figure 1). The development and early expansion of the industry occurred first in Peninsular Malaysia and Sumatra prior to 1990, but expanded over the next two decades to include both the Indonesian and Malaysian regions on the island of Borneo (Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). Growth in Malaysia has been more or less constant, but slowed slightly in the last temporal period, and shifted from Peninsular Malaysia to the states of Sabah and Sarawak over time. Indonesia surpassed Malaysia as the world's largest producer of palm oil in 2007 due largely to expansion in Sumatra; however, growth of new plantations in Kalimantan predominated between 2006 and 2009/2010. In the last five year period, expansion slowed in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah, and Sumatra, but increased dramatically in Kalimantan, while holding steady in Sarawak, Papua and Papua New Guinea (Figure 1). The trajectory of land use change is fundamentally different in each of the three countries. In Papua New Guinea between 2001 and 2010, only 3% of total deforestation (800,000 ha) was the result of oil palm plantations; nonetheless about 54% of all new oil palm plantations (42,600 ha) originated due to deforestation (see Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). In Indonesia, the land use change trajectory is more complex and the forest degradation process is often compounded by wildfire, particularly in Kalimantan, which has led to the development of large areas of quasi-natural habitat dominated by shrubs and grasses (Figure 2). Oil palm plantations have expanded into these so-called \"degraded lands\" in approximately equal proportions as compared to forest when considering both upland and swamp forest habitats. In Malaysia, the establishment of new plantations tends to be a more straightforward process: Forests are first degraded by intensive logging and although there may be a time lag between logging and conversion, these disturbed forests are then converted directly into oil palm plantations (Figure 3).In Indonesia and Malaysia, large areas of existing agricultural land and other types of plantation estates were converted to oil palm between 1990 and 2010; at the same time, the agricultural frontier continued to expand at the expense of natural forest landscapes. The total area of the other types of plantations and agroforest decreased, however, because more of these two land cover types were converted to oil palm than were replaced by the conversion of forest (see Figures 2 and 3). The area dedicated to annual crops remained constant in Malaysia, while increasing by about 46% (3.6 Mha) in Indonesia (see Table 6 - Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). Land use and land use change is best described as dynamic and complex. Different types of agriculture and plantation production systems are responsible for the conversion of natural forest. A large but variable fraction of deforestation is due to the establishment of new oil palm plantations, which is displacing simultaneously other forms of productive land use. In almost all cases, all forms of agriculture and plantation forestry follow forest degradation, which presumably is initiated by logging and aggravated by wildfire.The relative proportion of land allocated to oil palm varies among regions. In Malaysia, there is a clear preference to establish oil palm plantations rather than other forms of agriculture and plantation forestry; at the national level, approximately 47% of all productive land (11 Mha) is dedicated to oil palm, a preference that is even more marked in Sabah where 67% of all previously deforested lands (2.3 Mha) are occupied by oil palm (See Figure 4). This trend is reflected also in the land cover category identified as bare soil. Although it is not possible to identify precisely the source and eventual end-use of this land cover type, trends identified in the land use change matrix indicate the preference for oil palm. For example, in Peninsular Malaysia about 9% of bare soil originated from forest landscapes between 2006 and 2009/2010, while 49 % originated from agroforest and other types of plantation landscapes; simultaneously, 6% of bare soils in 2005 were part of the oil palm estate in 2009/2010, a number in line with a replanting cycle of 25 years. In contrast, the previous land cover for bare soil in Sarawak was largely forest habitat, including upland (27%) and swamp habitats (48%). Approximately 50% of all bare soils were eventually planted to oil palm in Malaysia; consequently, the emission estimates for Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak have been adjusted accordingly (see Supplementary Material). In Sumatra, Papua and Papua New Guinea, the category bare soil was employed to identify non-productive land cover types, such as beaches, rock slopes and similar areas, while the bare soils category was not used when classifying land cover in Kalimantan. In the three regions of Indonesia included in this study, approximately 24% of productive land cover types dedicated to some type of intensive agriculture, agroforest or plantations estate (32 Mha) have been allocated to oil palm plantations, due mainly to the more diverse productive landscapes that characterize the island of Sumatra (Figure 4). An additional distinguishing characteristics of land cover in Indonesia when compared to Malaysia, is the abundance of quasinatural non forest habitat categorized as shrub and grassland. These land cover types are often referred to as \"degraded lands (Fairhurst & McLaughlin, 2009;Fairhurst et al., 2010) and in 2009/2010 covered an estimated 20% (10.5 Mha) of the total surface area of Kalimantan compared to 5.4% (2.9 Mha) occupied by large scale oil palm plantations (Gunarso et al., 2013this publication).The conversion and drainage of peat soils for the production of palm oil also varies across the region. Sumatra has the largest area of peat soils and the largest area that has been converted to oil palm production (Figure 5). palm industry in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea Reports from the Technical Panels of the 2 nd Greenhouse Gas Working Group of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) 75 Although the overall rate of growth of oil palm in Sumatra decreased in the last temporal period, the rate of conversion of peat swamps increased with an annual rate of conversion that grew from 44,000 in the 1990s to almost 77,000 ha yr -1 between 2006 and 2009/2010 (Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). Sarawak has the largest proportion (41%) of its total peat swamp area converted to plantations with about 476,000 ha, which also happens to be about 36% of the total oil palm plantation area in the state. Plantations on peat expanded at 59,520 ha yr -1 in the last temporal period, translating into an annual loss of 7% of the remaining peat forest habitat in Sarawak (see Supplementary Material, Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). Kalimantan converted relatively small areas of peat soil prior to 2005, but converted more than 307,000 ha in the last temporal period, a 10-fold increase in area that represented 11% of all the oil palm plantations on the Indonesian sector of Borneo Island in 2009/2010. Only about 2% of all oil palm plantations in Papua occur on peat, although between 6 and 8 Mha of peat soils have been reported for the region (Wahyunto et al., 2011).Only small areas of peat soils have been reported for Papua New Guinea and there are no reports of oil palm plantations occurring on any of them.Net annual emissions from land use change and emissions from peat soils linked to the expansion of oil palm plantations in the study area were estimated at approximately 92 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the first temporal period, which increased to 106 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the second, and then increased markedly to 184 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the most recent period (Figure 6). In the three regions of Indonesia included in the study, total net annual emissions from land use in the oil palm sector for the same periods ranged from 58 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the first period, 65 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the second and 127 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the last period. In Malaysia, total net annual emissions for oil palm and land use for the same periods ranged from 33 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the first period, 40 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the second and 57 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the last period. Emissions from Papua New Guinea were estimated at 0.5 Tg CO2 yr -1 between 1990 and 2000, which increased to 0.6 Tg CO2 yr -1 between 2000 and 2010.The relative importance of the emission source varied over the twenty year period (Figure 6). Between 1990 and 2000 emissions from above ground carbon due to land use change (AGC due to LUC) represented about 60% of total emissions, but emissions from peat oxidation represented 53% of total emissions by the last temporal period. Deforestation as a source of land for the expansion of oil palm became more important in the last temporal period; nonetheless, the incremental emissions originating from existing plantations operating on peat had come to dominate the emission profile. Emissions from peat fires varied over the three temporal periods, essentially tracking land use change on peat soils.As expected, the total emission profile varied among regions and over time. Sabah, Papua and Papua New Guinea were all characterized by emission profiles dominated by above ground carbon due to land use change, although Sabah's were large when compared to those of Papua and Papua New Guinea (Figure 7). In contrast, the largest source of emissions in Peninsular Malaysia and Sumatra were due to the oxidation of peat, the consequence of declining rates of land use change, but also due to the incremental expansion of oil palm plantations operating on peat soil. Low rates of land use change have stabilized the emissions profile in Peninsular Malaysia, but in Sumatra the relatively large incidence of peat fires indicates that emissions from peat oxidation will continue to increase in the near future. Sarawak and Kalimantan both had emissions profiles that changed over time: AGC due to LUC was the major source of CO2 emissions in the first period, but the importance of peat oxidation increased as plantations expanded on that soil type. As in Sumatra, the large component of estimated emissions from peat fires is an indication that emissions from peat oxidation will increase over the near term in both Kalimantan and Sarawak (Figure 7). To evaluate the relative importance of oil palm as a source of CO2 emissions in the land use sector, we compared emission estimates for oil palm plantations to similar emission estimates for other major land use categories in Malaysia and in the Indonesian study area (Figure 8). This comparison was restricted to emissions from AGC due to LUC and peat oxidation; the impact of peat fires was excluded because of lack of data and a logical framework for developing a model to estimate those emissions. Similarly, only the second and third temporal periods are considered, because we lacked data on land cover change for the other sectors between 1990 and 2000.Over all, emissions in Indonesia increased from 562 Tg CO2 yrin the second temporal period to 679 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the third, with oil palm plantations representing approximately 11% (61Tg CO2 yr -1) and 16% (107 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of the total from AGC due to LUC and peat oxidation. The largest source of CO2 emissions came from AGC due to forest degradation with 226 Tg CO2 yr -1 (40%) between 2000 and 2005 and 277 Tg CO2 yr -1 (41%) between 2006 and 2009/2010. The second largest source was peat oxidation from disturbed swamp forests and shrub land, which typically have lower water tables than undisturbed swamp forests due to the construction of canals built to extract timber; our model showed these emissions decreased between the second and third temporal periods from161 Tg CO2 yr -1 (29%) to 152 Tg CO2 yr -1 (22%), a decline that can be attributed to the conversion of these areas to oil palm plantations, a type of land use change that essentially transfers pre-existing emissions to the palm oil sector (Figure 2). Mean annual emissions from agroforestry and other types of plantations represented about 8% in both periods (43 and 53 Tg CO2 yr -1 ), while those from intensive agriculture increased from 7% (42 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) to 11% (74 Tg CO2 yr -1 ).Over all, emissions in Malaysia decreased from 136 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the second temporal period to 112 Tg CO2 yr -1 in the third, with oil palm plantations representing approximately 21% (29 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) and 32% (36 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of the total amount from both AGC due to LUC and peat oxidation combined. Changes in AGC due to forest degradation were the source of 32% (43 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of total emissions between 2000 and 2005, but decreased to about 8% (8.5 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) between 2006 and 2009/2010. Emissions from peat oxidation on degraded swamp forest and shrub habitats decreased from 16 Tg CO2 yr -1 (12%) to 14 Tg CO2 yr -1 (13%); the consequence of these land cover types being converted to oil palm plantations. Annual emissions from agroforestry and other types of plantations declined from 34 Tg CO2 yr -1 (25%) to 27 Tg CO2 yr -1 (24%). The emissions from the AGC due to LUC and peat oxidation linked to intensive agriculture decreased from 0.8 to 05 Tg CO2 yr -1 .The impact from peat oxidation on the emission profile of oil palm production is becoming increasingly important. Unlike emissions from peat fires and AGC both of which track land use change (Figure 7), the increase in emissions from peat oxidation has been consistent, linear and unidirectional (Figure 6 and 7). The impact of peat oxidation is particularly evident in the case of Sarawak, where it represented less than 11% (0.9 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of total palm oil emissions in the first temporal period, but represented 40% (12.5 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) by 2009/2010. Moreover, these statistics do not include the future emissions from an additional 98,000 ha of bare soils on peat documented in the last temporal period (Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication); historical patterns predict that approximately 80% will be planted to oil palm plantations. Once these lands are incorporated into the oil palm estate, our models predict that emissions from peat oxidation will increase by approximately 30% in Sarawak. Sumatra has an even greater legacy of long-term CO2 emissions from peat oxidation, which represented 77% (56 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of total emissions linked to oil palm plantations for the island by 2009/10.In Peninsular Malaysia, where approximately 8% of oil palm are operating on peat soils (Gunarso et al. 2013 -this publication) they are now the source of about 84% (9 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of the emissions profile of oil palm linked to land use, a statistic that is not likely to change significantly over the short term. In the case of Kalimantan, AGC due to LUC remains the predominant source of emissions, but emission of peat oxidation will increase in the short term. Only Sabah shows consistently low levels of emissions from peat oxidation, due to the relative scarcity of peat soils in that state. Over all seven regions, plantations operating on peat soils occupied about 18% (2.4 Mha) of the spatial footprint of large-scale oil palm plantations, but peat oxidation from these plantations represented 48% (88 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of the total emission profile in 2009/10.This report provides the first sector-wide estimate of CO2 emissions linked to land use and land use change for the palm oil industry in the geographic region that produces 85% or more of the world supply of palm oil and palm oil products (Teoh, 2010). The primary objective of this report was to estimate the sources, dimensions, and trends of emissions over the past twenty years; as a secondary objective, we compared these emissions in the broader context of emissions caused by other types of land use. Previous reports of CO2 emissions linked to land use and palm oil have either been based on bottom up models that estimate emissions as a function of palm oil mass or unit of energy (Reijnders & Huijbregts, 2008;Wicke et al., 2008) or on landscape-scale analyses that do not provide a global estimate of emissions, nor capture the geographic variability characteristic of the industry (Uryu et al., 2008;Koh et al., 2011;Carlson et al., 2012a;2012b;Miettinen et al., 2012aMiettinen et al., , 2012b)). This report provides detailed information on the historical emissions linked to the expansion and operations of oil palm plantations stratified according to land cover source, soil type, geographic region, and temporal period. This information is essential for establishing the industry's baseline emissions and for developing future scenarios to evaluate the impact of different development options (see Harris et al. 2013 -this publication).Like all studies that document the complex phenomenon of land use and land use change, our study addressed the challenges linked to the quality of available data and the difficulties of interpreting dynamic processes that change over time. These challenges, and the decisions on how to manage them, are sources of variation and uncertainty inherent in a study of this nature. For example, the stratification of land cover types into undisturbed forest, disturbed forest, shrub land and grassland is an approach used by ecologists to qualitatively describe a continuous gradient; however, deciding where one category ends and the next begins is imprecise, and sometimes arbitrary, particularly when relying on satellite imagery covering large heterogeneous areas characterized by varying levels of human activity. Many academic studies choose to manage this challenge by using automatic classification techniques based on the spectral signature of image pixels (Hansen et al., 2009;SarVision, 2011;Broich et al., 2011;Carlson et al., 2012b;Miettinen et al., 2012a;Margono et al. 2012), but that approach limits the number of categories that can be discriminated and excludes useful information that can be reasonably interpreted from the landscape context. Moreover, as the number of strata increase, automatic procedures require extensive human editing, which in terms of labour and objectivity, are not unlike visual recognition techniques. Fortunately, oil palm plantations are easy to identify in satellite imagery and the results from Gunarso et al. (2013 -this publication) are similar to other studies that have been conducted on shared landscapes (see below). The same cannot be said for the ability to distinguish among other natural, quasi-natural and human-derived land cover types, however, and the level of confidence in the transitions among these different land cover types is less robust. To improve accuracy and facilitate communication, we aggregate similar types of land cover categories based on edaphic attributes (upland vs. swamp), vegetation type (forest vs. shrub and grassland), and land use (plantation and agroforest vs. agriculture).One of the largest sources of uncertainty in estimating the emissions from land use change linked to oil palm plantations is the variability in carbon stock estimates in above ground carbon for the different land cover types. The source of this variability has three origins: 1) natural spatial variability of AGC in forest and non forest land cover types, 2) the impact of logging and fire on above ground carbon in intact but disturbed forest habitats, and 3) the temporal period which is used to calculate emissions from land use change.For forest, shrub and wetland categories, we use the mean value of all published reports from Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea, while values for agriculture, agroforest and other plantation categories were based on scientific and technical publications (see Agus et al., 2013 -this publication). Agroforest, which is sometimes referred to as mixed tree crops in the Indonesian classification system, is a heterogeneous category of different land use intensities, including secondary forests, small farms, pastures, coffee and cocoa, and even small-scale oil palm plantations. The border between agroforest, disturbed forest and shrub land is subject to interpretation and, consequently, a source of uncertainty in emissions estimates.The estimates of the carbon stock in oil palm plantations, which represent a uniform cropping system and a species with simple allometry, have also been the subject of discussion among workers who seek to estimate the GHG footprint of palm oil as part of a life cycle analyses. For example, a fully mature 25-yr old plantation can have as much as 155 Mg C ha -1 , while time-averaged estimates range from 23 to 50 Mg C ha -1 (Dewi et al., 2009;Khasanah et al., 2011). The timeaveraged value adopted in this study (36 Mg C ha -1 ) does not account for differences among new high yielding dwarf varieties or short rotation cycles favored by some companies, nor low stand densities in poorly managed plantations, senile plantations on peat soils, or smallholder's crops that might have a low carbon stock value.Soil type and climate influence plant growth and lead to differences in AGC in humid, semi-humid and dry forest formations (Saatchi et al., 2011). Carbon stocks are also influenced by species composition and the Dipterocarpaceae, a plant family that dominates many forests in Southeast Asia, is characterized by tall trees with high wood density which endows undisturbed forests in the study area with unusually high values for above ground carbon (Slik et al., 2009). The relative abundance of this family, which is also known for its high quality timber, also influences logging intensity; and timber extraction rates in Borneo have been estimated at 230 m 3 ha -1  an order of magnitude greater than is common to Amazonian forests (Butler, 2009). This level of logging intensity reduces the carbon stocks in a standing forest, and is a major cause of forest degradation that is magnified by conventional logging practices (Sist et al., 2003). In spite of the loss of above ground carbon, the logged forests in Southeast Asia retain much of their original biodiversity and as many as 75% of the original complement of birds and dung beetles persist in disturbed forests (Edwards et al., 2010). The innate value of this biodiversity, coupled with the inherent capacity of these forests to regenerate and restore carbon stocks, motivate some ecologists and environmental advocates to refer to these disturbed forest as \"natural forests\" or \"intact tropical forests\" or \"primarily intact forests\" or even the oxymoronic \"degraded primary forests.\" Some ecologists and many foresters use the term \"secondary forest\" to describe disturbed and degraded forests; this term has its origin in classic ecological theory that describe how ecological processes mediate a succession of vegetation types following severe disturbance (Clements, 1916). The terms \"secondary forest\" and \"degraded forest\" are used by advocates of the palm oil sector to emphasize that palm oil expansion has not occurring at the expense of \"primary forests,\" an affirmation supported by the land use change study that underpins this report (Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). This view emphasizes the economic advantages of palm oil production in the context of the low residual economic value of intensively logged forests, the contribution of palm oil to national GDP and its benefits to rural livelihoods (Cramb & Cury, 2012).We avoid these pitfalls in terminology by using the terms \"disturbed\" and \"undisturbed\" forest, as well as document the transition from undisturbed forest to disturbed forest, and then to shrub and grassland, with separate categories for both upland and wetland habitats (Table 1). In addition, we relied on five year temporal comparisons to capture the intermediate stages that distinguishes our study from others that used longer temporal periods (Koh & Wilcove 2008;Carlson et al., 2102b; see Discussion in Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). Unfortunately, we were not able to fully document the changes in land cover change between 1990 and 2000 in Indonesia when both logging and forest conversion were at their highest (Hansen et al., 2009); nonetheless, evidence from the two subsequent periods shows that the oil palm sector is not responsible for the loss of the largest part of the carbon stocks of the original forest cover in these regions (Figure 9). Forest loss via degradation was greatest in Kalimantan where 40% of forest loss between 2006 and 2009/2010 was caused by the degradation of approximately 0.9 Mha of forest to shrub land and the release of 155 Tg CO2 yr -1 , almost 52% of total emissions for the region excluding all emissions from peat fires. The historical emissions from above ground carbon due to forest degradation, presumably due to logging and wildfire, were more than four times greater than emissions from above ground carbon due to land use change caused by the establishment of new oil palm plantations in the same temporal period (32 Tg CO2 yr -1 ).Emissions from peat oxidation and peat fires have increased in both absolute and relative terms over the 20 year period and now represent a total of 64% (118 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of all emissions from land use and land use change linked to the palm oil sector. If the one-time emissions from peat fires are excluded, then emissions from peat oxidation represent 48% (88 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of total emissions. Moreover, CO2 emissions from peat oxidation are not subject to the temporal fluctuations linked to land use change and the establishment of new plantations. Unless these plantations are abandoned and restored as wetlands, they represent a long-term attribute of the palm oil production system (Schrier-Uijl et al., 2013 -this publication). Although the direction and trend of CO2 emissions from peat oxidation are clear, the actual dimensions of these emissions remain uncertain. This uncertainty is the consequence of four factors: 1) the spatial extent of peat soils, 2) the depth of drainage, 3) the rate of oxidation of peat, and 4) the incidence of fire at the time of plantation establishment (see Agus et al., 2013;Schrier-Uijl et al., 2013 -this publication).The spatial data used to model emissions in this and other studies are based on soil maps derived from satellite imagery, and thus are subject to the uncertainty linked to that technology. Gunarso et al. (2013 -this publication) had access to two sources of information on the distribution of forest wetland: a peat soil map distributed by Wetlands International for Indonesia (Wahyunto & Subagjo, 2003;Wahyunto & Suparto, 2004;Wahyunto et al., 2006) and data from the Harmonized World Soil Database for Malaysia (FAO 2009). However, a more recent study for Sumatra and Kalimantan has reduced the spatial extent of peat swamps by approximately 15% (Wahyunto et al., 2011), while a study using official soil maps developed for Malaysia reported that peat formations were 5% greater (Omar et al., 2011). Since the emissions from peat are dependent on a model that uses data derived from these information sources, improvements in the accuracy and precision will impact estimation of emissions from peat fires and peat oxidation.Assumptions made regarding the depth of drainage impacts the outputs from models that estimate CO2 emissions due to peat oxidation. According to better management practices recommended by the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil, the recommended depth of drainage is 60 cm, a level which both maximizes plant productivity and minimizes CO2 emissions. In many plantations, water table depths are not actively managed and often fall below 80 cm during the annual dry season, particularly during periods of severe drought (Lim et al., 2012). Since the models used to estimate emissions from peat oxidation are simple linear correlations, the mean level of drainage used in those equations will directly impact emissions estimates.The heterotrophic respiration linked to the degradation of the peat, here referred to as peat oxidation, is perhaps the most uncertain of all the emission factors used to model emission estimates from oil palm plantations. Studies conducted over the past decade have generated estimates of heterotrophic respiration that range from 20 to 95 Mg CO2 ha -1 yr -1 (see review in Agus et al., 2013 -this publication). The differences stem from methodological challenges associated with the two main experimental approaches employed to measure peat oxidation. One approach correlates soil subsidence with peat oxidation, a method that can confound soil compaction with peat degradation and, consequently, requires research protocols that document bulk density (weight per volume) and carbon density (% carbon content). The other approach directly measures CO2 flux on the soil surface using closed chamber systems; however, this method must discount for autotrophic respiration from plant roots, which produce CO2 while consuming carbohydrates produced by photosynthesis in the leaves of living plants. Failure to adequately account for autotrophic respiration will inflate estimates of CO2 emissions from peat oxidation. The selection of 43 Mg CO2 ha -1 yr -1 was based on a review of recent studies and is near the median value of the range of these values (see Agus et al., 2013 -this publication); other recent studies have based their models on a substantially higher emission factor of approximately 95 CO2 ha -1 yr -1 (Uryu et al., 2008;Koh et al., 2011;Carlson et al., 2012a;2012b;Miettinen et al., 2012aMiettinen et al., , 2012b) ) Peat fires are an important source of CO2 emissions in Southeast Asia and the haze linked to those fires is an important transboundary issue within the region. Estimation of historical emissions from peat fires has high uncertainty, because of the difficulty in documenting the intensity, depth and spatial extent of fire data collected by satellite sensors. For example, modeled estimates of CO2 emissions during the unusually severe El Niño event of 1997/98 produced values between 2.9 and 9.4 Pg CO2 when extrapolated across all of Indonesia (Page et al., 2002). A similar approach that included fires in both mineral and peat soils reported emissions of 3.5 Pg CO2 for the same event, as well as estimating annual emissions from fire in Southeast Asia that fluctuated between 0.09 and 1.3 Pg CO2 between 2000and 2009(van der Werf et al., 2010). We did not calculate region-wide estimates of peat fire emissions due to lack of data on the distribution and severity of peat fires across all land cover types. Our modeled estimates of historical emissions from peat fires for oil palm plantations are based on the assumption that differential amounts of peat are consumed by fire at the time of plantation establishment from forest and shrub (see Agus et al., 2013 -this publication). Our estimates of emissions from peat fires on oil palm plantation correspond to 2% of total mean annual fire emissions between 2000 and 2005 (481 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) and 6% between 2005 -2009/2010 (467 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) (van der Werf et al., 2011 and Supplementary Material).Taken individually, the variability of any single emission factor can lead to relatively large differences in the final estimate of the CO2 emissions; taken together, these uncertainties become multiplicative and lead to very different estimates of the carbon footprint of palm oil (Reijnders & Huijbregts, 2008). Based on published reports, the range of potential carbon stock values in forest land cover types is from 74 to 360 Mg C ha -1 , the emission from peat oxidation may be half as much smaller or twice as large, and the potential depth of burning can vary from zero to as much as 50 cm depending on the severity of seasonal drought. The values selected for the modelled estimates presented here are based on the mean value of all published peer reviewed studies (above ground carbon), a critical evaluation of peer reviewed studies (peat oxidation) and recommendations from informed individuals (peat fire depth).A comparison of a subset of our results based on land use change data from Kalimantan (Gunarso et al. 2013 -this publication) with a similar study focusing on palm oil and CO2 emissions from the same region (Carlson et al., 2012b) provides an opportunity to evaluate how different emission factors, land cover stratification methodologies, and temporal perspectives impact model outputs. Both studies were based on land use change data derived from similar satellite imagery covering two decades between 1990 to 2009/10. Both are in close agreement as to the rate of growth of oil palm plantations (293% for Gunarso et al. vs. 278%,for Carlson et al.). Both have similar estimates of the spatial footprint of oil palm plantations in 2009/10 (2.9 vs. 3.2 Mha), and both arrive at similar estimates of the total area of oil palm plantations established on peat soils in 2009/10 (307,000 vs. 402,000 ha). However, the two studies have very different emission estimates (Table 3). Understanding the source of these differences is essential for organizing emission monitoring protocols that will allow the palm oil sector to accurately quantify its CO2 emissions, as well as identifying strategies to reduce those emissions. In the first temporal period, the expansion of oil palm plantations on peat soil was relatively small; consequently, the difference in the emissions estimates is due largely to assumptions regarding how land cover classes were defined and how land use change was quantified. Carlson et al. (2012b) recognized two forest classes, agroforest and non forest, while Gunarso et al. (2013 -this publication) recognized four forest types and four non forest types, as well as separate agroforest and plantation categories. The relative abundance of these categories and their associated carbon stock values was the source of 91% of the variance in the emissions profiles between the two studies (see discussion in Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). There is an element of subjectivity to any land cover classification, particularly when attempting to stratify a continuous gradient, which in this case is a transition from undisturbed forest to grassland. In that context, Carlson et al., (2012b) recognized more area as forest along that gradient, while Gunarso et al. (2013 -this publication) recognized more area as shrub and grassland.An alternative methodology is to use pixel-based estimates of carbon density that reflect the variability of ecological gradients (Saatchi et al., 2011). In a companion study, Harris et al. (2013 -this publication) used this type of information to model future emissions scenarios for different oil palm development strategies. As part of that effort, they used the polygons developed by Gunarso et al. (2013 -this publication) in combination with the pixel-based data from Saatchi et al. (2011); their objective was to train the forward looking model using historical land use change data between 2000 and 2010 (see Table 4 in Harris et al., 2013-this publication). That training exercise revealed that the AGC stock values selected for the four forest habitats were similar to the mean values derived from the pixel-based map of carbon density (see Table 4, Harris et al., 2013 -this publication). In contrast, the mean values selected for AGC for shrub categories were about 50% lower for upland habitats and 25% lower for swamp habitats. If we had used mean carbon stock values for shrub land similar to those derived from pixel-based values, the modelled emission estimate from above ground carbon due to land use change in Kalimantan would have increased by about 35 Tg CO2 yr -1 (a 40% increase) between 2000 and 2005 and 86 Tg CO2 y -1 (a 50% increase) between 2006 and 2009/10. Nonetheless, these modified values would still be less than 50% of the modelled estimates reported by Carlson et al. (2012b) (see Table 3).In the temporal period spanning 2001 to 2009/2010, the source of variance is more complex with 65% of the difference attributed to AGC due to LUC with the remaining variance originating from the use of different emissions factors for peat: 17% from peat oxidation and 18% due to peat fire. In the case of peat oxidation, the major factor was the selection of an emission factor of 95 Mg CO2 ha -1 yr -1 by Carlson et al. (2012b) versus a value of 43 Mg CO2 ha -1 yr -1 recommended by Agus et al. (2013 -this publication). Similarly, Carlson et al. (2012b) assume that on average 203 Mg C ha -1 are lost during a fire event on peat soils, while Agus et al. (2013 -this publication) recommended values of 90 Mg C ha -1 lost from peat soil fires from forest conversion and 30 Mg C ha -1 from peat soil fires on shrub land. The difference in the modelled estimates are the consequence of the assumption made concerning the depth of peat fires: Carlson et al. (2012) assumed a mean burn depth of 33 cm based on studies documenting the impact of fire during El Niño drought years (Ballhorn et al., 2009), while Agus et al. (2013this publication) assumed that on average 15 cm are lost when forest is cleared and burned and 5 cm when shrub land is cleared and burned.Finally, the time frame in which the comparison is made is an additional factor that can influence the estimation of CO2 emissions and, subsequently, allocating those emissions to the appropriate economic or social actor. Between 2000 and 2010, Gunarso et al. (2013 -this publication) stratified LUC into two five year periods (2000 to 2005 and 2006 to 2009/2010), while Carlson et al. (2012b) evaluated change between 2000 and 2010. As the authors point out in the supplementary information of their article: \"Due to the 10-year interval between the land cover product and the oil palm coverage, our analysis likely overestimates the amount of intact forest converted to oil palm\" (see Supplementary Information, page 7 from Carlson et al., 2012). The adoption of two five year periods allowed Gunarso et al. (2013 -this publication) to document the sequential degradation of undisturbed forest to disturbed forest and then to shrub land prior to its conversion to oil palm plantations (see Figure 10, Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication). The recognition that land is degraded and partially depleted of carbon stocks prior to its conversion to oil palm plantations should be taken into account when estimating the CO2 emission profile of palm oil. At least some of those historical emissions are more properly allocated to the forest sector due to the intensive logging regimes that characterize the region (Putz et al., 2008) and the impact of forest fires on peat soils that are a combination of bad luck due to drought and the difficulty in fighting wildfires in remote regions of Indonesia (van der Werff et al, 2010).The rate of expansion of oil palm plantations has been remarkably constant at approximately 7% per annum from 3.5 to 13.1 Mha between 1990 and 2010. The growth in the spatial extent of oil palm plantations has been accompanied by a concomitant increase in the CO2 emissions, which including all CO2 emissions from AGC due to LUC, peat oxidation and peat fires, has grown from 92 Tg CO2 yr -1 between 1990 and 2000 to 106 Tg CO2 yr -1 between 2001 and 2005 and 184 Tg CO2 yr -1 between 2006 -2009/2010. In the third temporal period, 67 Tg CO2 yr -1 (36%) originated from AGC due to LUC and about 90% of these emissions came from deforestation, which has been the source of about 3.5 Mha of the land that has been used for the establishment of new plantations. A smaller area of approximately 3.3 Mha originated on landscapes classified as agroforest or other types of plantations, while 1.7 Mha was developed on land that had been covered by forest in 1990, but which had been degraded to shrub and grassland prior to its conversion to oil palm plantations between 2000 and 2010.The documentation of this land use trajectory, which includes the transition from undisturbed forest to disturbed forest to shrub land and eventually grassland, dominates the historical CO2 emissions of the region. Forest degradation, presumably due to intensive logging and its subsequent conversion to shrub land due to wildfire, contributed approximately five times greater emissions (285 Tg CO2 yr -1) between 2006 and 2009/2010 than the AGC due to LUC component of the palm oil emissions profile (55 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) for the same period. This explains, in part, why our estimates of oil palm emissions from AGC due to LUC are less than a third of other studies whose models assume that oil palm plantations are established on forests landscapes of high carbon density. The results from a companion article (e.g., Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication) show that the land cover types used for oil palm plantation expansion has varied over time and among geographic regions; emissions from AGC due to LUC, not surprisingly, track those differences. Emissions from AGC due to LUC can be reduced by promoting oil palm plantation expansion on landscapes with low to moderate levels of AGC, such as the approximately 9 Mha of shrub and grassland in Kalimantan and 8 Mha of agroforest in Sumatra (see Gunarso et al., 2013 -this publication).Plantations on peat soils now represent about 18% of the spatial footprint of the palm oil industry (2.4 Mha), but represented almost 64% (118 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) of the total CO2 emissions profile in the last temporal period. About 16% (29 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) are linked to peat fires, while almost 48% (88 Tg CO2 yr -1 ) originate from peat oxidation from existing oil palm plantations operating on peat soils. The emissions from peat fires are one-time events that occurred in the past when forests and shrub land were cleared for new oil palm plantations; these fires are now illegal and unlikely to contribute to future emission profiles. In contrast, emissions from peat oxidation will continue to grow in absolute terms as oil palm companies develop new plantations on existing concessions on peat soils in Sumatra, Kalimantan and Sarawak. Even if the industry acts to halt new development on peat soils, the existing oil palm plantations on peat soils will continue to emit CO2 at approximately these levels for the foreseeable future. Emissions from peat oxidation can only be terminated by restoring the natural hydrological and ecological conditions that cause peat to form in the first place. Similarly, enforcing the ban the use of fire for land clearing will significantly reduce emissions, especially on peat land.Just as CO2 emissions from AGC due to forest degradation are greater than those linked to land use change from the palm oil sector, emissions from peat oxidation from degraded swamp forest with altered hydrological regimes are greater than similar emissions from oil palm plantations (166 vs. 88 Tg CO2 yr -1 ). Emissions from degraded swamp forests have declined in the last temporal epoch, in part because logging of remnant swamp forests already has declined, but also because this land cover type is being converted into oil palm plantations. Consequently, CO2 emissions from degraded swamp forests are being transferred from that category to the oil palm plantation sector.Finally, by comparing our results with other recently published studies, we show that the uncertainties in estimating CO2 emissions are subject to the methodological approaches and assumptions used to model emissions from land use and land use change (see review by Agus et al., 2013 -this publication). In spite of the differences in the dimensions of the CO2 emissions between our models and those employed by other studies (see Carlson et al., 2012b;Page et al., 2011), the overall trends are nearly identical. The rapid expansion of palm oil sector over the last two decades has been responsible for the emissions of several gigatons (Pg) of CO2 from land use and land use change.Understanding the sources of these emissions, which have been variable in time and space, is a necessary first step in identifying strategies for reducing, eliminating or even reversing the net CO2 emissions of the industry."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0347663255.json b/main/part_2/0347663255.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76b71a702fceae932b7dc6188547e6f4a97d99d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0347663255.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"108e83a2cce736111d89d3e591fdb0bd","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/72ed9618-b58d-4ffa-8d7e-4b7cd457af43/retrieve","id":"1898471101"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a70b4438-891e-4707-a23e-a6d07c74526e","content":"The application of biotechnology tools has made it possible to make significant advances in the detection of pathogens and in the study of the genetic variability of pathogen populations. As a result, adequate disease management strategies can be planned, and disease resistance markers for plants as well as DNA regions associated with resistance can be identified. Diseases, mainly those caused by microorganisms that cannot be cultivated in artificial media such as phytoplasmas, can be diagnosed using PCR. The bacterium Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis (Xam) can be identified using a specific probe and the identification of Ralstonia solanacearum in the soil is also facilitated by PCR. Species of Phytophthora can also be identified, phytoplasmas classified, and pathogen diversity established by using PCR-RFLP, thus improving the understanding of action mechanisms and how they co-evolve with the host. Other techniques such as RAPD, AFLP, and RAMS have made it possible to study the genetic variability of pathogens such as Sphaceloma manihoticola, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, C. acutatum, Sphaerotheca pannosa, Ceratocystis paradoxa, and X. axonopodis pv manihotis. The identification of QTL markers associated with resistance to different species of Phytophthora in cassava has helped elucidate the genetics of resistance, whereas the identification of SSR markers associated with resistance to Xam is a tool that facilitates the selection of resistant genotypes. Functional genomics tools such as microarrays will give initial insight on the molecular basis of cassava's defense response to X. axonopodis pv manihotis. Also, the identification of resistance genes and resistance gene analogs in cassava contributes to the genetic improvement of this crop. Biotechnology is evolving continuously, offering modern tools that help solve plant health problems.La aplicación de las herramientas que ofrece la biotecnología, han permitido lograr grandes avances en la detección de patógenos, adelantar estudios de variabilidad genética de poblaciones de patógenos, lo cual permite planear estrategias adecuadas de manejo de enfermedades, identificar marcadores asociados a la resistencia de las plantas a las enfermedades e identificar regiones de ADN asociadas con resistencia. Mediante la Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa (RCP) se pueden diagnosticar enfermedades, principalmente las causadas por microorganismos que no se pueden cultivar fácilmente en medios artificiales, como los fitoplasmas. Mediante una sonda específica es posible identificar la bacteria Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis. La identificación de Ralstonia solanacearum en suelo se facilita mediante PCR. Mediante PCR-RFLP es posible identificar especies de Phytophthora, clasificar fitoplasmas y establecer la diversidad de patógenos, los cuales permitirán un mejor entendimiento de los mecanismos de acción y su co-evolución con el hospedero. Otras técnicas como RAPD, AFLP y RAMS, han permitido estudiar la variabilidad genética de patógenos como Sphaceloma manihoticola, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, C. acutatum, Sphaerotheca pannosa, Ceratocystis paradoxa y X. axonopodis pv manihotis. La identificación de marcadores QTLs asociados a la resistencia a diferentes especies de Phytophthora en yuca, han contribuido a dilucidar la genética de la resistencia, mientras que la identificación de marcadores SSR asociados a la resistencia a X. axonopodis pv manihotis es una herramienta que facilita la selección de genotipos resistentes. Herramientas de genómica funcional como los microarreglos permitirán una comprensión de la base molecular de la respuesta de defensa de la yuca a X. axonopodis pv manihotis.In the tropics, many diseases cause severe crop losses but their causal agents are not yet identified. Biotechnology tools are useful for efficiently detecting pathogens. Below we describe the detection and identification of the pathogens causing or associated with the following diseases in specific crops: lethal wilt of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis), frogskin disease and superelongation disease of cassava (Manihot esculenta), phyllody of lulo (Solanum quitoense), crispiness of coffee (Coffea arabica), and anthracnose of soursop (Annona muricata). Also discussed are pathogens that can affect several crops such as Phytophthora spp. (cassava, cacao, and Heliconia sp.) and Ralstonia solanacearum, which affects plantain (Musa AAB), Heliconia sp., tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), hot pepper (Capsicum sp.), potato (Solanum tuberosum), eggplant (S. melongena), and canna (Canna indica).Plant diseases caused by bacteria can be severe, especially in warm, humid zones. Cassava bacterial blight (CBB), caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis, is a major constraint for cassava production, causing losses of the entire crop. X. axonopodis pv. manihotis can be detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), on amplifying an 898bp fragment. Using a specific probe, Verdier and Mosquera (1999) detected the bacterium in affected leaf and stem extracts, fruits, and sexual seed.Bacterial wilt is caused by different races of Ralstonia solanacearum. It is a serious soil-borne disease of many economically important crops, including tomato, potato, tobacco, banana, plantain, and eggplant. The pathogen can also be transmitted through contaminated irrigation water, equipment, or personnel, and spreads very easily by transplanting infected plants and propagules. Bacteria in plant tissues and soil can be accurately detected by PCR, using specific primers that amplify a 288-bp fragment on a 16S rRNA gene (Martins, 2000). CIAT (2004a). reported, and registered at the GenBank database sequences obtained through PCR from different crops affected by different R. solanacearum races (Table 1).Phytoplasmas are bacteria that have no cell walls. Being plant pathogenic, they are associated with diseases in more than 300 plant species. Because culturing them in vitro is not yet possible, their detection and identification have been based largely on their molecular characteristics. Furthermore, preliminary classification of unknown phytoplasmas can be accomplished through RFLP analysis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA groups. Some phytoplasmas have been found to cause diseases previously considered to be viral.Based on the similarity of observed symptoms and reported diseases caused by phytoplasmas, researchers at CIAT amplified DNA fragments of phytoplasmas from oil palm, cassava, lulo, and coffee, using nested PCR. Moreover, these phytoplasmas could also be classified, using RFLP (CIAT 2002(CIAT , 2004b;;Álvarez et al. 2003a, 2003b, 2004).In addition, CIAT (2004b) confirmed the association of a phytoplasma with cassava frogskin disease through DNA amplification with specific primers. This pathogen was detected in affected roots and leaves by nested PCR and transmission electron microscopy. A total of 320 DNA samples were obtained from infected plant tissues and another 80 from healthy tissues (Table 2). DNA sequencing of PCR products and banding patterns obtained after digestion of the amplified products with the enzymes AluI, RsaI, TaqI, and MseI enabled us to identify the products as belonging to the 16SrIII group (or X-disease group). Of the methods used in this study, PCR was the most sensitive for detecting, identifying, and classifying phytoplasmas.The first report of a phytoplasma being associated with lethal yellowing disease of oil palm was described by CIAT (2004b). A protocol was developed to identify the phytoplasma through nested PCR and DNA sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA region obtained from oil palm, glands and intestines of insect vectors, and weeds. Likewise, DNA sequence analysis revealed that X-disease group phytoplasmas were associated with coffee crispiness (Galvis et al. 2003) and \"machorreo\" of lulo (Álvarez et al. 2003a).Fungi and pseudo-fungi (Cromista, Oomycota) cause diseases that result in serious yield losses in many crops around the world. One such disease is Phytophthora root rot (PRR), which attacks the roots, stems, and sometimes leaves of cassava crops grown in many different agroecological areas of Africa, Latin America, and Asia.Sequence-based identification of fungi is actually based on an rDNA gene complex, which is present in all microbial pathogens. Fungi carry three genes (18S, 5.8S, and 28S), which have spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) located between the genes. Within the rDNA gene complex are (1) highly variable sequences that provide unique signatures that identify species, and (2) conserved regions that contain genomic codes for the structural restraints present within organism groups. The ITS regions contain the major variability and, under most circumstances, these regions are useful for species recognition.Knowledge of an unreported Phytophthora species, P. tropicalis, and P. melonis in cassava was generated by a DNA sequence analysis of the ITS region of the 18S rRNA gene. An alternative technique, the PCR-RFLP, was also applied, using amplification with ITS1 and ITS2, or ITS4 and ITS6, and digestion with the enzymes AluI, TaqI, and MspI. Phytophthora palmivora from cacao and P. cryptogea from heliconia were also identified by ITS-region sequencing (Table 1) (CIAT 2004b).Superelongation disease of cassava (SED), caused by Sphaceloma manihoticola, is an important foliar and stem disease, causing crop losses of more than 80% in different areas in South America and the Caribbean. PCR fragments, obtained with ITS4 and ITS5, were isolated, cloned, and sequenced (CIAT 2004b), the sequences reported in the GenBank database (Table 1). PCR fragments, obtained with ITS1 and ITS4 from DNA of Glomerella spp. isolated from soursop were also cloned and sequenced (CIAT 2004b), and the sequences reported in the GenBank database (Table 1).The successful identification of pathogens through molecular tools such as PCR and DNA sequence analysis will help improve host resistance and accelerate the identification of potential insect vectors and alternative hosts. Thus, it will encourage the development of new and effective practices for controlling these diseases.Once we have identified a pathogen, we can conduct genetic diversity studies to enable us to better understand it, its mechanism of action, and its co-evolution with its hosts. With such knowledge we can direct management strategies towards increasing crop productivity through disease resistance to that pathogen. That is, we can develop plants that resist targeted populations of the pathogen rather Manzana 20 20 0 0 -a Total number of samples processed from plants obtained from the field and grown in the greenhouse and screenhouse. P = leaf petioles; MR = leaf midribs. b The same number of samples was taken for both greenhouse and screenhouse. P = leaf petioles; MR = leaf midribs. c Moderately infected. d Severely infected.than fulfill a specific objective. Thus, we can prevent the potential economic imbalances that so often negatively affect the poorest farmers, who are the main producers of many important crops such as cassava.We now describe some of the genetic diversity studies carried out by CIAT researchers on several pathogens causing major crop diseases such as CBB, SED, powdery mildew, anthracnose, and bud rot.By characterizing Xanthomonas axonopodis pv manihotis's genetic diversity, we can select a set of strains to search for resistance factors in cassava varieties targeted for an area carrying a given X. axonopodis pv manihotis population. Through RFLP and AFLP analyses, pathogen diversity was found to be limited in Africa but broad in South America, cassava's center of origin. High genetic diversity was also found in Brazil, Venezuela, and Colombia, with different pathotypes specific to each ecozone. The very high genetic diversity is possibly related to the also very high levels of genetic diversity observed for the host plant (Verdier et al. 1993;Restrepo et al. 1996;Restrepo 1999;CIAT 2002). The X. axonopodis pv manihotis isolates also showed that the structure of bacterial populations is also shaped by the spatial and temporal distributions of their diversity.Using molecular techniques such as RAPDs, AFLP, and RAMs, Álvarez et al (2003c) detected variability in isolates of Sphaceloma manihoticola from south-central Brazil and Colombia, although genetic variation in the Brazilian population was narrower than that of the Colombian population. The RAPD analysis revealed high polymorphism, that is, considerable intraspecific genetic diversity, indicating that the pathogen may be able to adapt readily to changes in the environment, overcome resistance of new cassava varieties, or develop to fungicides. The groups of isolates identified by genetic and pathogenic characterization of the pathogen showed no strong correlations, although high correlations existed between geographic origin (country and municipality) and genetic variation, hence indicating a possible center of diversity.For Brazilian isolates, we could distinguish between isolates of S. manihoticola from cassava and those from milkweed, and also between S. manihoticola and S. krugii. In addition, RAPD analyses clearly differentiated among the levels of genetic variation among the host-plant populations of S. manihoticola. One study (Álvarez and Molina 2000) of Colombian isolates collected from cassava plants affected with SED and from Euphorbia heterophylla (a Euphorbiaceae species like cassava) showed how useful molecular markers are to better understand the movement of pathogen populations between geographically isolated regions and the effectiveness of host resistance (Álvarez et al. 2003c). These results would have been difficult or impossible to obtain on the basis of morphology alone.Powdery mildew is caused by the fungus Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, and is a major constraint to rose production. In Colombia, this disease is widely distributed, affecting the quality of Rosa spp. grown in greenhouses and causing serious economic losses. Molecular and pathogenic characterization of isolates generates information on the pathogen's genetic structure, thereby helping to make the most appropriate and durable crop management decisions.Using RAPD and RAMS techniques, DNA polymorphisms were detected among isolates obtained from six rose cultivars grown on farms located in Cundinamarca (Colombia). Molecular analyses revealed considerable genetic diversity among the populations of S. pannosa var. rosae. The relationship between origin and genetic diversity suggests that different disease management practices will be needed according to farm and environment. The genetic variability observed with the analyzed primers proved that the pathogen is able to mutate and, depending on the environment in which it is found, can adopt several forms by which to survive in different tissues of the rose plant (Álvarez et al, 2000).Broad genetic variability was detected by AFLP and RAMS in isolates of Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides, collected from citrus and soursop (Annona muricata), respectively. In soursop, these results showed a relationship of the variables \"pathogenic variability\" and \"colony diameter\" with \"genetic variability\". The genetic variability observed with this technique was high. If we consider that sampling was restricted in terms of the study area, then we can deduce that (1) high variation exists among the pathogen's populations in different agricultural and climatic regions with geographic isolation, and (2) high variation exists within groups of isolates selected previously for their morphological traits such as colony diameter. This suggests that a broader, more systematic sampling must be planned to answer doubts arising from this preliminary study of Colletotrichum populations (Ospina y Álvarez, 2003).To evaluate genetic variation in C. acutatum, the causal agent of citrus anthracnose, isolates were collected from a wide range of citrus species under varying conditions and from different geographic zones of Colombia. We used AFLP to analyze them and found considerable genetic variation, but no consistent relationship between the groups and host species or collection zones. These results confirmed the variability, both phenotypic (i.e., morphological traits) and genetic (molecular traits), that exists within the causal agent of citrus anthracnose. The results also confirmed that different species of the pathogen are associated with the disease (Ospina, 2002;CIAT 2003).Isolates of Ceratocystis paradoxa and related fungi were collected from oil-palm plantations and other crops in Colombia and characterized. Morphological comparisons, mating systems, and phylogenetic analyses (including the use of molecular markers) revealed a complex of five different taxa: C. paradoxa (banana), C. radicicola (date palm), C. fimbriata (cacao), C. paradoxa sensu stricto (oil palm) and a clearly distinct species in its ITS sequence and morphology (oil palm) intermediate between C. paradoxa and C. radicicola that should be described as new (CIAT 2000). These findings demonstrated that a disease may result from the activities of a complex of pathogens. Another eX. axonopodis pv manihotisple is the Phytophthora-Pythium soft rots that attack oil palm. Disease management strategies should therefore be oriented towards dealing with such complexes.Molecular markers also comprise an important tool for breeders. In cassava, for example pv manihotis, they were studied to identify their association with genetic resistance to cassava bacterial blight (CBB). More than 400 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were evaluated, leading to the identification of one SSR marker. This was associated with CBB resistance in a segregating cassava backcross family under field conditions (Hurtado 2004).Another example is QTL mapping for resistance to root rot in cassava, which was performed in family K, using simple marker analysis. We detected and mapped nine QTLs associated with P. tropicalis resistance, two QTLs with P. palmivora, and two with P. melonis (Álvarez et al, 2002;Llano 2003;Loke 2004). The QTLs were located on different linkage groups. Some QTLs would be expressed in one crop cycle but not in another, depending on the environmental conditions for crop development. The low phenotypic variance explained by the identified QTLs support the hypothesis of minor genes controlling Phytophthora resistance, as suggested by Llano et al. (2004).The presence of conserved domains permitted grouping of resistance genes (R genes) into at least four classes and to propose their possible function in the defense response as part of signal transduction pathways. R genes are clustered in the genome of several species and different genes within the same cluster can determine resistance to diverse pathogens. Based on sequence similarity between R genes, Llano et al. (2004), using degenerated primers designed from resistance genes of different crops, obtained four resistance gene analogs (RGAs), corresponding to NBS candidate genes, whereas Hurtado and Álvarez(2003) obtained 10 RGAs (NBS, Pto, kinase, amd LRR). One RGA showed association with CBB resistance in a segregating cassava population. The sequences were reported in the GenBank database.Identifying genes associated with defense responses is a highly critical step, leading to the elucidation of disease-resistance mechanisms in cassava. Soto-Suárez et al. (2004b), using subtractive hybridization, identified genes differentially expressed during CBB pathogen attack. From two resistant varieties, 1536 clones were isolated. Sequence analysis of these showed that 16 cDNA clones shared homology with plant genes involved in defense responses. Another 70 clones were either homologous to plant genes of unknown function or showed no homology, thus representing potentially new genes involved in cassava's defense responses.Soto-Suárez et al. (2004a) performed microarray hybridization, using as treat ent cDNA from resistant cassava plants collected at different times after infection and, as control, cDNA from healthy plants. Functional genomic tools such as the cassava microarray provided a preliminary comprehensive overview of the molecular basis of the cassava defense response to the CBB pathogen. It will help in the future understanding of the defense mechanisms used against other important pests and diseases.A PCR approach was used, with specific primers for the Xa21 gene (which confers resistance to Xanthomonas in rice), to isolate a 900-bp fragment (PCR250) in cassava cultivars showing high resistance to X. axonopodis pv manihotis (López et al, 2004). The PCR250 fragment showed 56% similarity with the Xa21 gene, and was located in the linkage group X and associated with a QTL that explained 13% of resistance to X. axonopodis pv manihotis (Jorge et al. 2000). The PCR250 fragment was also used by López et al. (2004) to screen a BAC library. The complete sequence of cassava Xa21 homologue gene was identified and named RX. axonopodis pv manihotis-1. It was 3600 bp long and contained an ORF of 1181 amino acids. This gene was induced 72 h after infection by X. axonopodis pv manihotis."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0359824650.json b/main/part_2/0359824650.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e237bde23fae6a3670bf2e5bfe341476ca0511a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0359824650.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3e890d7a3f4b783e77fe1196c6a7cf55","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4db476a9-5798-4b83-8330-f5f5fe331b52/retrieve","id":"-801008277"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b56703b8-826c-47ed-ba86-58501a801bb4","content":"Young people in agriculture: the key to strengthening Africa's future Across Africa, young and innovative entrepreneurs are channelling their energy into a vast array of agricultural initiatives. Their goal is clear: to create new economic opportunities and to contribute to the development of their communities. Yet because these agripreneurs often work out of public view, their contribution is not always fully appreciated by their communities.To inspire other young people, in 2016 CTA supported the creation of Agribusiness TV following a call for projects launched as part of its ARDYIS programme. The objective was not only to promote the development of the businesses of young agripreneurs, but also to showcase their experiences and encourage young Africans to consider agriculture as a vocation.I am pleased to report that Agribusiness TV has been a resounding success. The stories published in this book show that it has helped to promote young entrepreneurs and enable them to reach new clients and establish themselves in markets that were still unexplored, while at the same time reaching other young Africans. Through these video stories, some were able to talk to entrepreneurs and find ways to overcome the challenges they faced, while others simply embarked on the great adventure of agripreneurship by drawing inspiration from shared experiences. As a sign of its success, Agribusiness TV has received many international awards, including the 2017 WSIS Forum Prize from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), and the Prix francophone de l'innovation dans les médias (Francophone Award for Innovation in the Media) from Radio France Internationale and the Agence internationale de la Francophonie (International Organisation for the French-Speaking World). This publication comes from CTA's desire to further highlight the methods and achievements of a number of entrepreneurs to inspire others, and bring them to a wider audience of both young people and those involved in agricultural entrepreneurship.This publication comes from CTA's desire to further highlight the methods and achievements of a number of entrepreneurs to inspire others, and bring them to a wider audience of both young people and those involved in agricultural entrepreneurship. Supporting young people in this sector is a CTA priority, which can only be effective if we better understand the fundamental aspirations of this generation, the challenges they face and the strategies they choose to implement. Beyond highlighting the entrepreneurs and charting their individual paths, each story raises questions as varied and as crucial as access to finance, the impact of the activities carried out, relations built with other young people, and the use of digital technologies in agripreneurship.Youth is one of CTA's three areas of intervention, and we therefore implement a number of programmes to develop agricultural entrepreneurship among this group: AgriHack Talent, PEJERIZ in Senegal and Mali, VijaBiz in Kenya, and DAIRY Profit in Eastern Africa. By focusing on the new generation, CTA is helping to accelerate the fight against underemployment and youth unemployment, while strengthening the agricultural sector.All these programmes are already bearing fruit, but a huge amount of work remains to be done. It is essential for all partners to collaborate, together with young people, to give them every opportunity to make the greatest impact, locally, nationally and globally. CTA is ready to contribute. Enjoy this booklet!Director PREFACE Over the next decade, 11 million young people are expected to enter the workforce in Africa every year, yet only 3 million formal jobs are created annually.Millions of young people therefore run the risk of being unemployed or underemployed. At the same time, urban areas continue to attract young people from rural areas, while not always being able to create enough job opportunities.For many African countries, however, agriculture is and will continue to be the main source of employment and income for the foreseeable future.Agriculture represents around 60% of employment on the continent, making it a fundamental sector, not only for food security but also for economic growth.The wider agricultural sector remains an important source of employment in rural areas, of course, but also in peri-urban and urban areas. It is particularly important to increase agri-food processing initiatives aimed at reaching out to a changing urban clientele, and to increase opportunities for the creation of non-agricultural economic activities in the technology and services sector.In spite of its potential, many young Africans are not attracted to agriculture because of its poor image, insecurity, and lack of competitiveness and support. The average age of farmers is currently over 50, so it is vital that younger generations join a sector that is so essential to the economies and to the food and nutritional security of the entire continent. Halatou Dem is a 32-year-old Malian entrepreneur.With a degree in finance, in 2011 she took over management of Danaya Céréales, an agricultural processing and marketing company founded by her mother in 1992. With regional and international markets in her sights, the company is in the process of obtaining ISO certification. The couple is also working to help other young agripreneurs by connecting them with distributors and providing them with advice.Ollasset Djoro Ahoua, 29, has a degree in tropical agriculture. In 2009 she launched her career in organic market gardening in the town of Agnibilekrou, in eastern Côte d'Ivoire.Elizabeth Gikebe is a 27-year-old Kenyan. A graduate in commerce and information technology, in 2016 she founded Mhogo Foods, an agri-food For many African countries, however, agriculture is and will continue to be the main source of employment and income for the foreseeable future.THE ENTREPRENEURS processing company specialising in gluten-free cassava production, based in Banana, in Kiambu.Grâce-Marlène Gnintoungbe is a 30-year-old Beninese entrepreneur. Her agricultural company, Les Jardins Chez Marlène, which is based in the town of Abomey-Calavi, specialises in organic fruit and vegetable production.Mohamed Ouedraogo is a 38-year-old entrepreneur who works in the commune of Kaya in Burkina Faso.In August 2012 he started producing and processing products using moringa, a shrub known for its high nutritional value, before creating his own company, Yeepaoum Production. Awa Caba is a 30-year-old entrepreneur from Claude Arsène Savadogo is a 32-year-old from Burkina Faso, with a master's degree in rural economics and agri-food business strategy, and another in economic and financial engineering of projects and public policies. In 2011, he created Bioprotect, a company producing and marketing organic inputs and pesticides, based in Fada N'Gourma. Imported goods are often cheaper and better presented, so convincing consumers to eat local products developed by agripreneurs is a real challenge.Young people are vulnerable as they work to build their reputation, they have few assets and struggle to build key partnerships to access profitable markets or capacity building.Taxation is often a heavy burden for start-up businesses, which also face ineffective agricultural support. Women in many communities often also struggle with accessing land.For a sector that relies so heavily on the weather, the impacts of climate change are a real risk for already fragile youth agribusinesses.Across Africa, farming has a very poor image; too often seen as a career for those who have not been to school. Education systems often do not encourage young people to take risks but instead seek the comfort of the civil service, or simple private-sector employment. Agripreneurs are unanimous: \"Our education system plants the seeds of discouragement: in primary school those who failed to move up to the next grade were sent back to their families and told they might as well go and farm the land.\"As agripreneurs work to make their businesses a success, the role of their family, friends, teachers and colleagues is decisive. In many cases, family and friends do not understand the potential of agriculture and do everything they can to convince them to give up their farming project.\" Young entrepreneurs face many challenges in developing successful businesses.A lack of financing, human resources, expertise, technology and access to markets are just some of the 10 challenges the 24 agripreneurs have highlighted, along with some strategies and solutions they devised to overcome them.The agripreneurs all agree that the best way to prove to family and friends that investing in agriculture is the right choice is to get training and carry out research to gain a full technical understanding of the field in which you want to invest. Agripreneurs need to be dedicated and take their enterprise seriously, and when success happens family and friends are usually convinced and their support follows.In many cases family is the primary source of funding allowing a young agripreneur's business to expand, so it is therefore important to avoid head-on conflict with parents, and to find the right approach to explain the value of the decision.Women agripreneurs face an additional problem in crossing very significant cultural barriers, especially when they opt for a production activity which requires access to land: \"In our culture, women cannot inherit land, so this is an additional problem for investing,\" Ollasset from Côte d'Ivoire recalls.\"Personally, I had to leave my village and move far away from home to rent some land, because tradition wouldn't allow me to have land at home.\" The agripreneurs' advise finding technical and commercial solutions to diversify sources of revenue, and increase the profitability of products:• Tomato producer Jean-Marie from Cameroon works around three annual growing cycles to maximise his turnover.• Ismaël from Togo is working to develop a new product from fresh tomatoes, targeting the broader population in order to increase his profits.• Ollasset from Côte d'Ivoire has chosen to target off-season market gardening, which means she faces less competition at harvest time.• Richard from Burkina Faso has successfully diversified by breeding rare poultry.• In Senegal, Souleymane built his company on originality, as he was the first to grow strawberries, creating a niche that gives him a significant advantage.Financing is critical in the development of a business. Interestingly, the 24 agripreneurs found ADDRESSING CHALLENGES that it is not so much the initial capital that is important -because this can be built up gradually -but the investment needed once the company has proved its technical ability, market demand is well established and the time has come to scale up. This is the point when increasing production capacity requires mechanisation, which means significant investments and specialised knowledge. Access to finance is also essential for businesses that require preliminary investment in research and development.Yet despite their innovative and promising ideas, entrepreneurs are often denied access to credit by banks. Roméo from Côte d'Ivoire faced this challenge when trying to develop his organic fertilisers using earthworms and cocoa waste.Young agripreneurs have developed a wide range of strategies to finance their businesses and make them profitable:• Looking for funding (gifts or loans) among friends and family: known as mobilising 'love money', or 'Family, Fools and Friends', this can provide a first investment to help launch a business.This was the approach adopted by Caroline from Côte d'Ivoire. • Turning to 'business angels': a kind of sponsor or financial partner who will provide financing and technical advice to young agripreneurs.• Appeal for sponsorship from private companies.• Keep a salaried job or consultancy work in order to ensure a stable or regular income that can be invested in the business: this was the path followed by Richard from Burkina Faso, who has a paid job at an NGO, and Awa from Senegal who does occasional consulting work, including for the United Nations.• Join a local tontine, where each member pays a monthly subscription which then provides regular annuities that can be used for investment in the company, as in the case of Stéphane from Cameroon.• Take part in competitions for the chance to win awards that generally take the form of grants (like Awa from Senegal); however, focusing too much on competitions could be harmful to the long-term development of the business.• Bring in an associate to invest in part of the business, like Régis from Benin.Nevertheless, the best strategy to get funding and develop a young enterprise is undoubtedly to offer quality products and efficient services that clients are prepared to pay a reasonable amount for on a regular basis. This should generate profits that can be reinvested when a company goes through harder times. Ismaël is currently working on an even more ambitious project which will require about 250 million CFA francs (€380,000). \"I plan to work with tomato growers, but in order to guarantee basic supplies, I want to start my own greenhouse production that will belong to the company,\" Ismaël explains. He also wants to improve the packaging of his product, offer other products that are more accessible for low-income consumers, and set up a tomato farm to ensure a basic supply for the company. To access the necessary funding, Ismaël has engaged in discussions with various institutions.Finding available, skilled and motivated human resources is a major challenge when it comes to starting a business. By itself, the motivation of the entrepreneur is not enough. As the business grows, an entrepreneur needs to be able to rely on a committed and responsible team. Qualified human resources are very expensive, and many agripreneurs opt to hire young people with few qualifications, whom they train as they go along.The agripreneur must also be careful not to be the only one who knows all the ins and outs of the business, leaving them unable to delegate when necessary. Trust in team members, employee supervision techniques and retention strategies, can all be significant challenges. With poor uptake of products and access to markets such common challenges, the 24 agripreneurs have developed extensive ways of overcoming these issues:• Make friends and family your first customers. • Become a processor as well. \"One solution in order not to be so dependent on prices imposed by traders on perishable vegetables is for the producer to become a processor,\" proposes Grâce-Marlène from Benin.• Develop partnerships. In order to be able to offer her customers a wide range of vegetable products, Grâce-Marlène has also entered into partnerships with other vegetable farms specialising in agro-ecology.• Stand up for yourself. \"You have to know how to stand up for yourself and not allow supermarkets and mini-markets to walk all over you with their system of sale on consignment,\" advises Halatou from Mali.from their client before confirming any order.\"• Engage in direct sales. \"We chose to market our products mainly through direct sales (85%), and we refuse to accept sale on consignment,\" reveals Ismaël from Togo. \"As a result, we now have about 40 serious sales outlets in Togo.\" (See box, Promoting tomatoes through social media and 'ambassadors').• Using social media to promote your product is the best option for new companies. According to Richard from Burkina Faso, \"You have to be aware just how important social media is in getting consumers interested in your product. To do so, be eloquent in describing your product in order to inspire people.\"• Take part in fairs or organise specific marketing events. \"Since 2016, Sooretul has been organising tasting and sales sessions in companies and institutions to convince middle-class customers of the benefits of using our platform to source quality local products,\"explains Awa from Senegal. \"During these sessions, we present Sooretul and the products that are available;we give advice on how to prepare certain products, and we offer direct sales. We have developed basket formulas that include an assortment of products from the female processors that we work with, alongside a system of registration and immediate discounts on delivery: it's a way of promoting the product. We've also established another kind of more 'selective' event -Sooretul nibbles -where we invite our customers and prospective clients to an after-work meeting, at which a nutrition expert presents the benefits of one of our products -fonio for example -and we have tastings of fonio-based dishes produced by the female processors.\"• With regard to the promotion of natural fertiliser products, agripreneurs have developed a strategy of guided visits to farms, where they explain how the products are used and the impacts that farmers can expect from them; a farmerto-farmer sponsorship system has also been developed, for example by Samuel from Kenya, who encourages producers to talk to others about their product, in exchange for discounts.For a sector that relies so heavily on the weather, the impacts of climate change are a real risk for agripreneurs. Ollasset from Côte d'Ivoire revealsTanko Timati has never used radio or television for marketing, only social networks -Twitter, Facebook and WhatsApp. We have several marketing strategies: first, we took advantage of a government programme with the national employment agency that provided us with three interns who carried out a communication campaign on the ground.We also have a sponsorship system, through which we offer free products to clients appointed as 'ambassadors' whenever they manage to convince another customer to take our products. The peak tomato production period is from August to October, so we offer a promotion during that period when the price of a bottle goes down from 500 CFA francs (€0.75) to 200 CFA francs (€0.30) per unit. As our packaging is in glass bottles, we try to collect returns as much as possible, and direct sales makes this easier; moreover, we provide incentives to our sales representatives to collect empty bottles by rewarding them according to the number of bottles collected and the number of new customers they have gained. Finally, and this is a crucial element, we are really trying to create a community and become a 'love mark': so every last Saturday of the month we organise a tomato race with a coach recruited for this purpose.Ismaël, founder of Tanko Timati, TogoADDRESSING CHALLENGES that in her first year of organic market gardening, drought destroyed almost all of her produce. She came close to giving up but held on, and her aim now is to be able to control her water supply by using drip irrigation, as soon as she is able to access the necessary funds.10. Poor public policies on entrepreneurship and agriculture As agripreneurs work to make their businesses a success, the role of their family, friends, teachers and colleagues is decisive.PASSING THE BATON… Boubacar Diallo, GuineaThe 24 young agripreneurs featured in this publication have not only dared to innovate and create wealth in their countries, while transforming the agricultural sector, but they have also become role models, coaches and creators of opportunities for other young people.Creating jobs for other young people In addition to providing employment, successful agripreneurs often inspire other young people to follow suit.PASSING THE BATON...In Burkina Faso, Claude Arsène's company By itself, the motivation of the entrepreneur is not enough. As the business grows, an entrepreneur needs to be able to rely on a committed and responsible team. Given that its main target audience is young people, who are ever more connected to the internet through their phones, Agribusiness TV has been designedspecifically for mobile viewing. The videos are available via mobile applications that can be downloaded for free, or they can be shared via Bluetooth where internet connections are poor.In addition, since young Africans are very active on social media, Agribusiness TV also has aFacebook page, a Twitter account, a LinkedIn page and an Instagram account. Facebook statistics show that 80% of page visitors connect via mobile phone.Agribusiness TV has produced more than 100 videos, which have been viewed more than 7 million times.Agribusiness TV's Facebook page has more than 168,000 likes and its YouTube channel and Twitter account each have more than 10,000 followers.Find out more http://agribusinesstv.info/en/"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0365044598.json b/main/part_2/0365044598.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..032bfd00c46d6f6de30e28b5aa4cdfd01da5967b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0365044598.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"14b55e4aafe7ed393fc7cd06696b4a2c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/decb0a62-659b-4f54-8e8a-a41f7a8a14b4/retrieve","id":"1980219695"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"122d84e1-b0e5-4896-8c23-35975481f11d","content":"~ ' \" o z , \\ FlgrHfJ ..J. Charcaa! rOf :ít mature f.eid-grown beans Qften extends :;) l~fJ pods resI.Jltmg Ir mfec!lOn ':>f the se€td 'S 45 Kenya 6,0 Relltstant 743.7 :.(Deutaromycetes: Coelomycetes} IS found throughout t\"le troolCS and subtroplcs and has a wide host rMge Together with most 01 tila legume crops, Ihe col'nrnon bean (phaseofus vulgaris) is a goad nost for the fungus which causes a ranga 01 symptoms, dependlng on environmental conditJOns and age oí the p¡ant. In addltlcr :0 charcoa! rot, which is a s1em or stal\" rot disease. the pathúgen alSÚ causes damping-ll' nf _ti\"\" I to carry out more studies on eomman weed species to determine those \"eed, that maj be susceptible and conlributing to ¡nnease leveh; or íno<.:ulum in the soil.Monocropping \\\\'lth commOn bean.c()\\vpea, maize and sorghum inCTea~ed charcoal rot diseasc incidence compared with fallo\\\\ plot,. The increase \"as more ir. the plots monocropp~d with common bean and cowpea. The number of infected seedlings. lhe llumber of mfecled planlS al harveSI and number of plan!s al harvesl appear lO be good paramelers for indicating lhe level ofinoculnm in the 5011. The significant negalive correialion between Ihe number ofmfecled seedlings and Ihe number of plants at harvest suggcSls that most infected seedlíngs do not survivc tú maturi(~, Comnwn bean and cowpe~-J. mature earJier than malze or sorghum. This probably permits early formation of sclerOli\" on tileso erap residues. Wyllié and Calven (l96q 1 showed flowéring aod pod formalian !O be the eondil1oning factor> for sclerotla formation. This may explain ¡he obsened tendenc)' of sclerolíal propagules to increast;: in the ':ioil after harvestíng, especialIy the susceptíbie Iegumes.It \\Vas interesting to observe that the plo!s Illonocropped witÍl legumes resulted in signlficanll)' (P = 0.05) more disease incidenee lhan those lJ1onocropped with cereals. This was unexpected since majze and sorghum have more dry maner and provide more organic substrate for the pathogen•s lJ1ultiplication. 11 could be tha! due to thelr late muturil\\• M. plla.leaNlla is not able to colonize the malze and sorghum erop debri, effectively due 10 the ver)\" dry condilions usualI) experienced at the end of the seasol1. 1n addiüon the hlgher organic maneI' content from the crop debri, in these pIOIS may encourage olher competitive micro-organisms like bacteria and actinomycetes which reduce colonÍzalion b~ Al. plwscolinll when soil mOlsture conditions improve fGhafTar el aL 1969: Dhingra el al .. 1976). Inoculum level5 were increa sed by common bean. cowpea. maize and sorghum in lhat order. Francl el al. (1988) also reponed thal soybean-sorghum rotalions were slightly better than soybean-com rotations in jowering;\\4. phaseolil1G in the soil.These results suggest that crop rotation among hosts of M. plzaseolina ma\\' s¡ill be a good charcoal rol managemenl option. Work on longer elfeCIS of crop species and popu~aüon dynamics of the associated micro-organisms in the sollls required. 50\",4,. Seeds from plants with no disease symptoms were 2.5°j\" Infectad while seeds from severely lniected piants had UP to 13.5% mfectlon. Survivat of too pathogen In crop rasIDua was investigated 10 fie!d so!! in eastern Kenya. Up to 3tY?ó ot sclerotla were found 10 be vIable atter 21 mon1hs in ñeJd $oil. SoU molswr€ and temperatura did not influence survlval up 10 a depth of 20 cm.The mes1 serious disease of common bean (Phaseolus vulgans L) in semi-arid easlem Kenya is charcosl ro! (Songa and Hillocks. 1996a,b) caused by Macrophomina phaseolína (Tassi) Goid. Yield loss lo charcoal rot has besn estlmateo to be up lo 300 kglha (Wortmann and Allen, 1994). The incidence of charcoal rot disease has increased in recent years because of increasing cultivation 01 marginal land due to population pressure (Songa and Hillocks, 1995b). Ssedlíng mortality of 10-14% ís common in experimental plots and farrners' fields (Songa and Rano. 1995). M. phaseolina is a soll•lnhabillng fuogus that grows poorly in soil and survives as sclerotia which provida Ihe inrtial inoculum (Smith, 1969;Walanabe et al., 1970).This pathogan 1$ also seedbome (Andrus, 1938: Gangopadhyay el aJ., 1970;Abawi and Paslor•Corrales. 1990). Sinee the level of sead Inlection depends on severity 01 plant Infeelion, selecllon of seed from symptomless plants ís expeclad to reduce the initlal imaclían. Infected seeds are distortad. blemíshed and carry sclerotia and pycnidia of the pathogen. Five percent reduction in seed weígh1 and as much as 600/(, reduction in emergence fmm diseased ssed has been reported in susceptible varietles (Gangopadhyay el al .• 1970). Andrus (1938) found natural seed transmisslon of M. phaseolina In Hendersoo Lima bean sead to be approximately 85% in unsteritized seed and 57% in surlace~ sterilized seed, indícating that the fungus is found not only on the surtaee but also beneath lhe ssed coal. Gangopedhyay el al. Severe infechon early in the season results in more seed infection due to high inoculum levels on Ihe planl and soi!.Conditions favouring ear1y ¡ntectton, such as warm temperaturas or low soil moisture, will encourage systemic seed infection, whereas moiS! condítlons towards the and of the growing season would be expected to encourage pod infectlon. This natural seed infection may account ter ssrious outbreaks of the dfsease occasionally observad in farmers' fields, The majonty of smallscale farmers who produce common bean use their own seed from the previous crop tor cuUivation in the next season (Rono and Shakoor. 1990). The use 01 clean dlsease-free seed would reduce the ¡n¡tital inoculum and lower the severity ot me dlsease. In arder. theretore, to develop effectíve control measures tor charcoal rot di5ease basad on cultural control practicas, it is essential to delerrmne the role 01 seed and erop debris in the survival of (he pathogen. In fulfilment of 1his requirement, this study haO the lollowlng oblecllves:1, To determine the extent 01 common bean seed inlec!Ion in relalion to seventy 01 plant inlection,To determine the extent 01 intemal inlactlon and surlaea ¡nlestation 01 saed.3. To determine the ellect of storage on viabilíty 01 sclerotia. 4 To Cletermone the survival 01 M phaseolína sclerotia in bean residue al vanous depths.Common bean genotype GlP 1004 was planted in a ehareoa! rot 'hot spaf at Kiboko ;n eastem Kenya. The trial was malntalned following recommended production practices including :ertiiizer application, ¡nsed control and weeding, A1 r.arvest the plants were harvested In ¡hree categolies depend~ ing on the :evej of infectioo. The categol1es were:(1) plants with no ashy stem symptoms.(2) plants wíth ashy stem symptoms but pods w,thout symtoms, and(3) plant. with ashy stem symptoms and pods bearing M phaseolina scleratia.Seeds lrom each category o! planls were tested for lhe presence ot the pathogen wíthout surface sterílization and after surlace stetilizaúon as ctescribed below. T o test the effect ot stOf\"dge on the pathogen. enough seed was reserved and keot in Kilner jars at room temperatura and the expeliment was repeated 6 months later.Fifty unstenlized seeds rrom each category were placad on múlst filter paper placad on plastlc trays previously cleaned and wipad with alcohol and enverad. Them were tour replícations in a campietely randomized design. The trays were incubated al 33 e with a 12 h dL. 12 h D lighl reg,me. The trays were maintained moist by adding distllUed waler when they became dr)'. Obs€lVation lar the presence of M. phaseolina was done using a binocular microscope from 3 to 7 days after jncubation at 33 C. The number of seeds that produced colonies of M. phaseolina on the seed coat, characterízed by numerous black sClerotia, were notad, Seeds wlth other fungal growth W9m lransferred 10 PDA for identificatioft The expeliment was repea1ed once.The procedure trere was as descnbed above tar unsleri!ized seed and the only difference was that the seed was surface sten!lzed by Irnmefslng 111 1% NaOel (10°.-;, dilutíon of commer~ c,ally available solution diluted with distilled water) lor 5 -B min and thoroughly rinsad in distilled water (Mihail and Alcom, 1982). Ona percenl NaOCI kills M. phaseolina \",ycelia lhat may be on lhe seeds and reduces signminicana X \nUruguay X \nVenezuela X X \n11 Los paIses de América Latina no incluidos, no desean por el momento material para \npiricularia, \n11 VIPAL; Vivero Internacional de Piricularia para América Latina que despachará el \nClAT. \nffiBN ; Vivero Internacional de Piricularia que despachará el mRI. \ny Material que despachará el ClAT. \nParticipantes en la Tercera Conferencia \ndel IRTP para América Latina \n1. Wolfgang Jetter* \nEstaci6n Experimental INTA \nCasilla de Correo N° 57 \nCorrientes, Argentina \n2. Francisco paz Antelo \nCIAT \nCasilla 247 \nSanta Cruz, Bolivia \n3. Eulalio Garcra \nMinistry of Agriculture \nandLands \nBelmopan, Belice, C.A. \n4. Peter G. Lee \nMinistry of Agriculture \nand Lands \nBelmopan, Belice, C.A. \n5. Nguyen Van Tan \nIICA/EMBRAPA \nCaixa Postal 179 \nGoiania, GoiáB, Brasil \n6. \n7. \n8. \n9. \nPaulo Serg10 Carmona \nInstituto Rio Grandense \ndo Arroz \nCaixa Postal 1927 \nPorto Alegre, RS \nBrasil \nSidnei Bicca da Rocha \nInstituto Rio Grandense \ndo Arroz \nCaixa Postal 1927 \nPorto Alegre, R. S. \nBrasil \nDerly Machado de Souza \nInstituto Agrooomico de \nCampinas \nCaixa Postal 28 \n13.1000 Campinas, SP \nBrasil \nArlindo Bonifacio \nGerente Nacional \ndo Projeto Arroz \ne Drenagem e Irriga930 \nEMBRATER \nSEP /Norte-W3-Q515 \nLote 03 \nBrasilia, DF, Brasil \n* Lrderes de Programas nacionales que cancelaron su participaci6n. \n68 \n10. Jairton Almeida Diniz 17. Benjam!n Rivera \nEMBRATER ICA - Turipaná \nSEP /Norte-WJ-Q515 Apartado Aéreo 206 \nLote 03 Monter!a, Córdoba \nBrasilia, DF, Brasil Colombia, S.A. \n11. Selson Almir Melo Cruz 18. Alberto Dávalos \nEMBRATER !CA - La Libertad \nSEP /Norte-W3-Q515 Apartado Aéreo 2011 \nLote 03 Villavicencio, Meta \nBrasilia, DF, Brasil Colombia, S.A. \n12. Dierson Farias Novaes 19. Hernando Suárez \nEMBRATER \nFEDEARROZ \nSEP /Norte-W3-Q515 \nApartado Aéreo 52772 \nLote 03 \nBogotá, D. E. \nBrasilia, DF, Brasil \nColombia, S.A. \n13. Valdemir Moura Oliveira Lima 20. Rafael Robayo \nEMBRATER ICA - Nataima \nSEP /Norte-W3-Q515 Apartado Postal 02 \nLote 03 Espinal, Tolima \nBrasilia, DF, Brasil Colombia, S,A. \n14. César P. Martfhez R. 21. Gustavo Villegas V. \nICA FEDEARROZ \nApartado Aéreo 233 Apartado Aéreo 52772 \nPalmira, Valle, Colombia Bogotá, D.E. \nColombia, S.A. \n15. Darro Leal Monsalve \nICA - La Libertad 22. Patricio Vargas \nApartado Aéreo 2011 ICA/FE DEARROZ \nVillavicencio, Meta Apartado Aéreo 233 \nColombia, S.A. Palmira, Valle \nColombia, S. A. \n16. Edmundo Garc!a Quiroz 23. Kitty Cardwell \nICA ICA - La Libertad \nApartado Aéreo 233 Apartado Aéreo 2011 \nPalmira, Valle Villavicencio, Meta \nColombia, S.A, Colombia, S. A. \n59 \n24. \n25. \n26. \n27. \n28. \n29. \nPeter R. Jennings \nCIAT \nApartado 55, Coronado \nProvincia de San José \nCosta Rica, C.A. \nJosé l. Murillo \nMinisterio de \nAgricultura y Ganaderfa \nApartado 10094 \nSan José, Costa Rica \nManuel H. Carrera \nMinisterio de \nAgricultura y Ganaderfa \nApartado 10094 \nSan José, Costa Rica \nRolando Gonz:!lez \nMinisterio de \nAgricultura y Ganaderfa \nApartado 10094 \nSan José, Costa Rica \nGustavo Veitra Montero \nMinisterio de la Agricultura \nCalzada de Rancho Boyeros \ny Crucero Armada \nMunicipio Cerro \nCiudad Habana, Cuba \nAlfredo Gutiérrez \nMinisterio de la Agricultura \nCalzada de Rancho Boyeros \ny Crucero Armada \nMunicipio Cerro \nCiudad Habana, Cuba \n60 \n30. José Roberto Alvarado \nINIA \n31. \n32. \n33. \n34. \n35. \n36. \nEst. Exptal. QUILAMAPU \nCasilla 426 \nChill1ln, Chile \nFrancisco Andrade \nINIAP \nApartado 7069 \nGuayaquil, Ecuador \nJulio Delgado \nINIAP \nApartado 7069 \nGuayaquil, Ecuador \nLoyd Jolmson \nINIAP \nApartado 7069 \nGuayaquil, Ecuador \nWashington Peñafiel \nINIAP \nApartado 7069 \nGuayaquil, Ecuador \nA. Vivian E. Chin \nGuyana Rice Board \n1 & 2 Water Street \nGeorgetown, \nRep11blica de Guyana \nLeroy Small \nGuyana Rice Board \n1 & 2 Water Street \nGeorgetown \nRep11blica de Guyana \n37. Luis Alberto Guerrero* \nMinisterio de \nAgricultura y Ganadería \nCENTA \nSan Salvador, El Salvador \n38. Walter Ramiro Pazos \nICTA \n5a. Av. 12-31, \nZona 9 \nEdificio \"El Cortez 11 \n2° nivel \nGuatemala, Guatemala, C.A. \n39. Carlos Alburez \nJCTA \n5a. Av. 12-31, Zona 9 \nEdificio \"El Cortez\" \n2° nivel \nGuatemala, Guatemala, C.A. \n40. Claude Grand-Pierre \nService de Recherches \nAgrícoles \nDARNDR-DAMIEN \nPort-au-Price , \nHaití \nn. Napoleón Reyes' \nMinisterio de Recursos \nNaturales \nD. A. R. 113 \nSan Pedro Sula, Cortés, \nHonduras, C. A. \n42. .Leopoldo Crivelli \nMinisterio de Recursos \nNaturales \nD.A.R. 113 \nSan Pedro Sula, Cortés, \nHonduras, C. A. \n61 \n43. . Leonardo Hernández Arag6n* \nINIA \nApartado Postal 11 12 \nZacatepec, Morelos, \nMéxico \n44. José Manuel Bravo B. \nInstituto Nicaraguense de \nTecnologra Agropecuaria \nApartado 2648 \nManagua, Nicaragua, C. A. \n45. Ezequiel Espinosa \nUniversidad de Panamá \nFacultad de Agronomra \nEstafeta Universitaria \nPanamá, Rep. de Panamá \n46. Carlos Reyes \nUniversidad de Panamá \nFacultad de Agronomra \nEstafeta Universitaria \nPanamá, Rep. de Panamá \n47. Rolando Lasso \nIDIAP \nApartado 6-4391 \nEstafeta El Dorado \nPanamá 6, \nRap. de Panamá \n48. Jorge Esteban Rodas \nMinisterio de \nAgricultura \nEstación Experimental \nCaacupé, Paraguay \n49. José Hernllndez Leyton 55. Benito Rodrfguez \nMinisterio de Depto. de Recursos Externos \nAlimentaciÓn Secretarfa de Estado de \nCRIA TI Agricultura \nApartado 116 Centro de los Héroes, \nChic1ayo, Pero Santo Domingo, \nRepdblica Domtn1cana \nAlberto Jiménez \n56. José Miguel Cordero M. \n50. ELANCO \nUniversidad Nacional Santo Domingo \n\"Pedro Ruiz Gallo\" Repdbltca Dominicana \nLambayeque, Pero \n57. Mohamed J. Idoe \nRice Research and Breeding \n52. Rafael Olaya Station \nMinisterio de P.O. Box 26 \nAlimentaciÓn New Nickerie, Surinam \nCRIA n \nApartado 116 \nNicolás Cbebataroff Chic1ayo, Pero 58. \nCentro de InvestigaciÓn \nAgrfcolas \n\"Alberto Boerger\" \n51. Victorino Saavedra Estación Experimental del Este \nMinisterio de 33 Ute 23, Uruguay \nAlimentaciÓn \nCRIA n \nApartado 116 59. Anibal Rodrfguez Herrera \nChic1ayo, Pero ClARCOjFONAlAP \nEstación Expe r1rnental \nAraure \nApartado 102 \n53. Manuel E. Castillo M. \nAraure, \nSecretaña de Estado de \nEstado Portuguesa \nAgricultura \nVenezuela \nEstaciÓn Experimental Juma \nBonao, Repdbltca Dominicana 60. Alberto Salih \nFONAlAP \nEstación Experimental \nCalabozo \n54. Yin-Tieh Hsieh Apartado 14 \nMisiÓn Técnico-Agrfcola Calabozo, \nEstaciÓn Experimental Juma Estado Guárico \nBonao, RepdbUca Dominicana Venezuela \n62 \nI / \nj \n• Luis L6pez \nPrograma Delta \nCVG \nApartado 2224 \nCaracas, Venezuela \n62. Harold E. Kauffman \nIRRl \nP.O. Box 933 \nManila, Filipinas \n63. J. P. Crill \nlRRl \nP.O. Box 933 \nManila, Filipinas \n64. Héctor Weeraratne \nCIAT \nApartado Aéreo 6713 \nCali, Colombia, S. A. \n65. Sang-Won Ahn \nCIAT \nApartado Aéreo 6713 \nCali, Colombia, S.A. \n66. Joaqufn A. González, F. \nCIAT \nApartado Aéreo 6713 \nCali, Colombia, S. A. \n67. Manuel J. Rosero \nCIAT/IRRl \nApartado Aéreo 6713 \nCali, Colombia, S. A. \n68. Fernando Femández \nCIAT \nApartado Aéreo 6713 \nCali, Colombia, S.A. \n63 \n69. Alexander Grobman \nCIAT \nApartado Aéreo 6713 \nCali, Colombia, S. A. \n70. B. A. C. Enyi \nWARDA \nP. O. Box 1019 \nMonrovia, Liberia \n71 . Jean Loop Notteghem \nlRAT \nBP 604 \nBovake, Costa de Marfil \n72. lván Buddenhagen \nIITA \nP.M.B. 5320 \nIbadan, Nigeria \n73. Pablo Buriticá \nlCA \nApartado Aéreo 151123 \nBogotá, D. E, \nColombia, S.A. \n74. J. C. Lozano \nCIAT \nApartado Aéreo 6713 \nCali, Colombia, S.A. \n75. David R. MacKenzie \nThe Pennsylvania \nState University \nCollege of Agriculture \nDepartment of Plant \nPatology \n211 Buckhout Laboratory \nUniversity Park, Penn. 16802 \nU.S.A. \n76. Carmen de L6pez \nPrograma Delta CVG \nApartado 2224 \nCaracas, Venezuela \n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0472610325.json b/main/part_2/0472610325.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20a4bd69fd733e538971841a33998f6eeede6fbd --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0472610325.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6c1defef9b40b5bf0a77f2bea0cabeb4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3fc49cf6-a13b-4b6a-90bc-ce3a39390555/retrieve","id":"825571294"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1b3773fc-3fb3-4bdf-bb3d-84a8483e9a74","content":"RESUME ' Cet article appuy6 sur une enqu6te socio-ticonomique 6tudie la productivit6 du bananier plantain en association et les con' traintes pour une production d grande 6chelle i partir des m6thodes pratiqu6es en cultutes associries ; on montre que ce dernier s]'steme produit prds de quatre fois plus. Ceci s'explique par I'application 16' gulidre de d6chets domestiques, une attention suivie du paysan et le ben6fice alimentaire retir6 par les plantains des arbres complant6s pr6rennes i enracinement profond. l.es limites du systime sont li6es i la fourniture de matirlre organique et au volume du march6. On peut accroitre la production pour la p6riode ereuse de juin d septembre et aussi en vue de la conqu6te des march6s 6loign6s grdce d de bons emballages.In the high rainfall areas of Eastern Nigeria plantain ranks high as a carbohydrate source. Although fairly large quantities are produced, it is not commonly found in the shifting cultivation systems in which most popular food crops are found. The bulk is produced in small intensively managed village cornpound gardens. These gardens are higNy productive when compared with plot in shifting cultivation or large scale commercial field lnterestingly, village compound garden plantains do not suffer from the rapid decline phenomenon obseryed in other fields. BRAI-DE and WILSON (l) concluded that the high productivity of the village compound garden plantain was the result of organic matter in the form of household refuse and kitchen waste applied regularly to these gardens that are usually close to the house and the kitchen.Important as these gardens are, they are not well understood. There have been cursory investigations into the biological factors, but the economics remain unknown. This report represents preliminary findings of investigation into the economics of plantain production in village compound gardens and their contribution to household income. The report is based on a sample survey of smallholder plantain producers in southeastern Nigeria conducted from January to December 1985. The objective was to describe the snallholder plantain production prac-tices and assess the value of resources used in it. Mar. 1988, vol.43, no 3, p.161-166.ABSTRACT -This paper, based on a socio'economic survey, investigates the productivitl' of compound plantain production and consriaints to ^large scale production on the basis of the compound p::riuction .\"1hud.. The paper shows that production under the c\",rpound svstem results in nearly four times as.much yield as in non\"ornpornd system. This is ahributed to regular application of kitchen ind other compound wastes, close cultural attention given by the farmen, and to nutrient recycling to the benefit of the compbund plantains from deep tooted perennial tree crops interplanted' i',arge rale production employing the compound methods is limited by iupply of organic matter and by available market for plantains' Availablo markei can be expanded by increased production during the slack period of June to September when output is low and by packaging to reduce damage in transit to take advantage of distant markets.-hq',**.;.,'u*r'*\" Fruitsvol. 43,no3,lggg Harcourt road. Every.household in this communrty had plantain mats (Fig. l) in the .o.pouud-unal t , also had some plantain mats in locations a titomet.r-o, ,*o uruy from the compound. Et\"u.n .o.fornJ'Of\"rr.,\" producers were purposely selected for the survey. The selection basis was the willingness of the farmers j affow free access to their compound farms to the enurnerator who collected the farmers compound plantain proaucti,on information, All non-compound plantain _plots in ,lre ;;, three in all, were also included in the studv for cornparatJe pLrrposes.The study was in the forrn of direct observatlon of the plantain production activities of the farrners ln their exist_ rng compound or nonrompouncl plantain for a period of l2 calender months. This was ,...;r\";;;;;use trre farmers did not keep records.Informat.ion including yiel. Most of them were interplanted with arable sia esculenta). All were ,:l:lj, :l:h, as. cocovam (coloca' ::.h u: o,r pui\",' (;;-,;\"';i::::;i Tli,irT#::H1;(Tr e c u tia afr i c a na), .o.onu i tco.r3,', \", ij)rri,' oir,.u, oru. (Dacryodes edulis), kolanut (Cota aiuriirini, orune\", (Citrus sinensis), and uon^, Gti)oc\"o^\"iii\"ii,,). Some of the plantains were originally pf.ni.J in\",J#ougn pits from where soit was taken ior h;r; ;;;r;r;;filo\"n. Ho*.u.., at the time of the study most of them stood o0-refuse mounds built up bv conlinuour or.pirg-.\"Ji tl,n.. rrr. most common items in the refuse *.r\" Z\"rr*a'peels and r Fruitrvol. 43ffi, 1988 -163 kitchen wastes especially wood ash. The corms of the plantains were covered with a mulch of applied organic matter from household wastes.Weeding was done occasionally because frequent appli_ cation of refuse suppressed weeds. Staking to prevent falling over of plants carrying bunches was very common. frr average of about l07o of all stands was staked each rnonth during the fruiting period.Two of the non-compound plantaii fields were established in 198 I and the third in 19g2.'The cultrvar used Vas the same as that used in the compound gardens. In all three, the fields were laid out in garden fashion with spac_ ing of 3 m x 3 m. The mean area for the three fields was 0.ll ha and hence they were at small scales. The owners were mere part time plantain producers. They all engaged in other agricultural and even non-agricultural activities. One owner had pineapple and another cassava intercropped with plantain on half of the fields. One field received a large quantity of poultry manure at planting. The others d1d-.not receive any special applicatior=pf organic marrer. All three fields had good weed control. Inorganic fertilizer was not applied in either the compound or non_compound plantains. I shows estimates of yield and value parameters tn both compound and non-compound plantains. Bunch yield in terms of both number per hectare equivalent (1600 mats) and weight per bunch appear significantly higher in compound than in ,ron.ornporrrd plantains. This resulted in total yield per hectare being nearly four times as much in the compound as in the non_compound plantains (Table I ).The difference in yield could be attributed to the difference in production practices. O.ganic matter from household wastes was. applied on the iu..\"g, nearly 300 days in compound and less than 30 days in n?ncompounO plantains out of the 365 days of tfre ituJv ifrUt\" Z). tn other words, most compound plantains recelvea organic matter daily.While the corms of most compound plantains were completely covered with the organic mattei the corms of non (pterocapus soyauxii) trees all in the compound.The supply of organic matter is also regarded as a ma;or constrarnt to expaasion of production in the compound garden situation. Exact figures on the amount of organic matter to maintain high productivity in these gardens has not been determined. The potential of inorganic ferti_ Iizer in compound gardens is also not known, bui inorganic fertilizers do not maintain production under field conditions (l). Inorganic fertilizers do not supply mulch which appear to be a major factor causing the high yield of compound plantains.But as important as resource limitations to expanslon ,of compound plantain production in the area is aggregate demand limitation. Figures 2 and 3 show that yield was seasonal and followed the rainfall pattern. The total rainfall for Owerri in 1985 was about 2g00 mm. However, that was not evenly distributed over the 12 months, falling mostly between May and October. November to Februarv were the dry months. The major harvest season began in October and continued through May when bunches formed during the rains matured. The bunch took about thJee months to mature (2). Bunches that developed during the rainy months were more robust .than those that developed during the dry rnonths because of more favourable soil moisture dr.rring the rainy season (4). -165 December was almost 60%. T-his situation would suggest that the market was easily saturated. The market could absorb expanded production, especially along present seasonal distribution of supply, only at give away prices and hence at capital losses to the producers. The market could however, absorb more output if the supply could be increased during the rainy months when output is at present low. Such a redistribution of supply may require irrigation which the small scale producers cannot afford.There is also possibility for expansion of available market in Nigeria when packaging and transporting are improved to allow the product to be presented in good condition in distant placesi Plantain bunches are bulky and perishable and hence expensive to transport to distant non-producing areas. It is estimated that an average piantain finger consists of 30% peel (3) which is not consumed by humans.Figure 5 shows the price differential between the village market in the study area and Oweri urban market only 20 km apart. The market price differential between the two locations over the study period was about l0%. This , could be considered substantial in reiation to the Limited distance between the two market centres. It might not all be due to differences in demand but also due to transportation costs especially because the Owerri urban consumers frequently made their purchases in the village market.;Plantain production in compound gardens in the Owerri area of Nigeria is. profitable, but expansion of production is constrained by limited resources and agggegate demand during the main season. The potential for expansion exists if supply jFn bg increased during.the off season which I occur during middle of the rainy season or when packaging and transporting are improved to alloi the pro'cluct to be presented in good condition in distant places. ,l llt 1. BRAIDE (J.) and WTLSON (c.F.). 1980. Plantain decline : a look at possi-ble cause. Paradisiaco, 4.5-7.2. NDUBIZU (T.9,c.1 and oKAFoR (E.r. Fruits,Mar.19g8,vol. 43,no 3, RESLIMEN -Rste articulo apoyado en una encuesta socio.econ6mica estudia a productividad aef pi6tano \"n ^o.i.\"'i;\" -V ii.\"'\"riar.\"ionJ para una pmduccidn a gran eicata \" p\".ui a\"-.Jiodo.'!'r.iti.\"do, .n cultivos asociados ;se orueba qie €ste tiltimo sistema pr'oduce casi cua. tro veces m6s. Esro se i*pri\"a ior i\" alil;;\"-\".#i.ii?ii*\"r,o, ao.mesticos, una atenci6n sesuida re r ra a o io;io!\"pi;;il;f ; rX :,TH :fi ',n #:,bT|\"ffi \"1'T:l,T: mizamiento profundo. Los limites del .iste;; -;6n \"iig;i;, \", ,rrni. nistro de materia orgdnica v al :::\".,{;::_;;;,\",6\".;;:;#r:::iT\"Tr\"';'1.::; .i' "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0476055222.json b/main/part_2/0476055222.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4564c94668471a31b0868b6f28fc1cdc00246ca --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0476055222.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1290cdccf12ef9272e47f18849f94d5c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/fa5cd6d9-c414-474b-8742-0dc4306724a0/content","id":"720190757"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9055a5ff-4b2f-444d-8428-4e37fa1ddf48","content":"Desarrollo del cultivo de maíz en algunas parcelas, se observa poco desarrollo vegetativo, con poca oportunidad para generar grano y forraje, San Marcos Monte de León, Villa de Chilapa de Díaz Productor Fernando Santiago Velasco, de la comunidad de San Bartolo Soyaltepec, estableciendo la mezcla de forrajes en el sistema milpa tradicional Mezcla de canola y ebo, intercalada con maíz, en Villa de Chilapa de Díaz (Izq.), y Heroica Ciudad de Tlaxiaco (Der.), para mejorar la cantidad y calidad de forraje para el ganado, sin disminuir la superficie de siembra del maíz Cultivo de Frijol Ayocote en e perímetro de la parcela para facilitar el manejo del cultivo principal (maíz), el ayocote ayuda a disminuir la erosión del suelo, genera grano para consumo humano y biomasa para enriquecer el forraje para el ganado. San Isidro, Heroica Ciudad de Tlaxiaco (Izq.), San Marcos Monte de León, Villa de Chilapa de Díaz (Der.).Mezclas de forrajes para mejorar la nutrición del ganado, en la región mixteca de Oaxaca. Avena-triticalecebada (arriba), Sorgo-Ebo (abajo), evaluados en la plataforma de investigación de Santo Domingo Yanhuitlán Técnico Raúl Ramírez, realiza revisión de muestras de los forrajes producidos en las diferentes unidades agrícolas, San Marcos Monte de León Aprovechamiento de lo forrajes establecidos en las unidades de producción agrícolas mediante el ensilaje con bolsas plásticas herméticas, para conservarlo y utilizarlo en etapas criticas de escases de alimento para los animales, San Marcos Monte de León."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0481987526.json b/main/part_2/0481987526.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..887ad34d36f8c7f7d710added37c646fda1c218f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0481987526.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e6f7d4f7586703be5774484667e4fc5a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d6cb0da9-aa0b-4b7b-b9f2-cc96b762845b/retrieve","id":"-808779769"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8d714dac-665c-429b-9c62-e615bfd09770","content":"• We define migrants as those who have sent remittances to a rural area within the last 12 months • 14 percent of youth migrate (15.5 percent female and 12.3 percent male) • Among young females that migrate 75 percent are married • Among young males that migrate 33 percent are married Big differences between young males and females in Groundnut Basin in terms of employment opportunities, education and land access Increased climatic variability is associated with a decrease in population and decrease in young male/female ratio• Improving soil quality through sustainable programs in agriculture may increase yields and keep some of the rural residents in agriculture • Seek ways to keep youth employed not only in agriculture but also in other jobs across the groundnut value chain THANK YOU!!"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0527981926.json b/main/part_2/0527981926.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..895f5e8859aaf2324e0c6823985d6561a65df44f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0527981926.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0434af66fed6e6de25d86aded2fbcd5a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/765c3d93-74c9-4b0b-8ade-264e4683b971/retrieve","id":"734115681"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1eac5622-5ea7-43f8-832e-864270bcb649","content":"Women constitute nearly sixty percent of the world's one billion poor. Of one-third billion people living in absolute poverty, over seventy percent are women. Over the last two decades of the twentieth century, the number of women living in absolute poverty has risen by fifty percent (in contrast to thirty percent for men).As the world population doubles the need for food will more than double, and world agricultural output per unit of labor will need to increase by a factor of ten, mostly in the Third World (Marris,1999). FAO estimates show that women account for more than half the labor required to produce the food consumed in the developing world. In Africa -where female farming is of paramount importance, nearly seventy percent of the staple food in the continent is produced by women farmers and is of increasing importance as more men migrate from rural areas in search of work (Saito et al.1990;World Bank 1989) This makes women in the Third World an important group not only as beneficiaries of poverty alleviation but as contributors to the economic growth required to end poverty.The different roles, rights and resources that men and women have in society are an important determinant of the nature and scope of poverty. This is especially (though not uniquely) the case among rural populations in the Third World, where there is a central relationship between the capacity of rural households to produce enough income or food year round to meet their basic nutritional needs and the control women have over inputs and outputs in the food production-to-consumption system. This paper examines the dimensions of poverty and the relationship between gender and the poverty of rural people in the Third World. This analysis is applied to formulate a proposal for the application of science and technology to improving food production and environmental protection, an agenda of central importance to rural women in the Third World.Between 1965 and 1992 according to Marris(1999) global poverty was reduced by about one third to the extent that half a billion people came out of absolute poverty. Nonetheless by the year 2000 there will be 1.5 billion people in absolute poverty in the world.Absolute material deprivation is one dimension of poverty. The UN Human Development Report (1997) for example, uses five statistical indicators all of which affect men and women differently, and are pertinent to describing gender-differentiated deprivation: life expectancy; malnourishment under five years of age; illiteracy; access to safe water and health services. These indicators help to signal a degree of deprivation below which material survival is severely threatened, but cannot tell us much about a number of other dimensions of poverty which are especially important to women.Income is a key aspect of poverty because in the absence of any other material assets, it reflects the capacity of the individual or household to obtain the minimum amount of goods needed to survive in society by sale or exchange of their labor. For example, the United Nations classifies a Third World person as poor if they are trying to live on less than $1 per day (adjusting for international differences in price levels ). For the poor who lack material assets (the \"laboring poor\"), their income depends on the value of their labor . One interpretation is that unemployment, under-employment, low paid work and unpaid work necessary to the maintenance of social lifeand performed largely by women, subsidizes the cost of wage labor in the market and provides a pool of cheap labor when required, thus keeping down overall wages and production costs. Thus efforts to reduce the poverty of low wage people, and in particular women, through income generation need to take into account the possibility that poverty based on the low value of their labor is a functional component of global as well as local market structures. Alleviation of this kind of poverty over the next half century will depend on increased overall economic growth, population control to keep the supply of labor from growing faster than demand, and a demand for labor that exceeds supply (Marris, 1999). This has some important gender implications explored in the next section.Any discussion of the dimensions of poverty needs to go beyond the measurement of income needed to provide the minimum amount of goods needed to survive. A useful framework for analysing the gender dimensions of poverty differentiates four dimensions which complement each other: starvation, subsistence, social coping and participation (Dean, 1999:8, after George andHowards, 1991). Relative poverty is as important as material poverty once starvation is overcome or basic physical survival is achieved. Inequality therefore, remains an important dimension of poverty even when we consider subsistence, which has socially defined standards that vary from one culture to another. By the end of this century the richest countries of the First World (about one tenth of World population), with over half of world GDP will be more than ten times better off than the poorest countries of the Third World (Marris, 1999). Some analysts show that wealth is becoming more concentrated. According to a United Nations report, the world's 358 billionaires in 1996 were wealthier than the combined annual incomes of the poorest 45 percent of the world's population(2.3 billion people). Whereas the richest 20 percent of the world's population were 30 times better off than the poorest 20 per cent in 1960, by the mid-1990ties they were 61 times wealthier (cited in Dean, 1999). Sen (1997) provides a concept of relative poverty very pertinent to analysing the gender dimensions of poverty based on the individual's capacities or capability to do many of the things valued in the society . This is similar to Runciman's (1966) concept of relative deprivation and Peter Townsend's (1979:31-57) concept of relative poverty, defined as the \"lack of resources to obtain the types of diet, participate in the activities, and have the living conditions and amenities which are customary, or are at least widely encouraged and approved , in the societies to which they belong.\" An important contribution by Townsend was to define the poverty line as a situation in which people are excluded from participation in key aspects of the public life of ordinary citizens, a concept which has been built on by others (eg Scott 1994) to interpret poverty in terms of either participation in or \"social exclusion\" from the ordinary things which other members of the public enjoy.The high degree of global material inequality at the end of the twentieth century influences what it means to be poor in relative terms. An example is the emergence of a privileged group in the labor force and among consumers who have access to personal computers from childhood, are highly computer skilled and are internet literate. Their influence in the global economy can make access to computers and computer skills an important element of relative deprivation and social exclusion and ultimately, determine the value of the labor of vast numbers who have not aquired these skills.The concept of social exclusion is important for our purposes because it provides a framework for understanding poverty in terms of different dimensions of participation, whether privileged participation or deprived participation. Jordan (1996) distinguishes between communities \"of fate\" and communities \"of choice\" as dimensions of poverty or wealth. Communities of fate are entrapped by a particular set of social and ecological circumstances, including coercion and subordination, both very relevant dimensions of the poverty of women in Third World societies as discsussed in more detail in the next section. Communities of choice in contrast, have the freedom and the power to define and accrue to themselves forms of social exclusion and privilege.Powerlessness is therefore a key dimension of a definition of poverty, although it is poorly operationalized in research. One way to conceptualize poverty in terms of powerlessness is to analyse the social distribution of risk or opportunity. At the negative end of this powerlessness spectrum might be the risk loss of control over one's own body (eg. of being sold into slavery or prostitution). At the positive end of the spectrum might be the opportunity to migrate to wealthier and higher-wage societies.Understanding poverty in terms of powerlessness has to be related to lack of resources as well as social exclusion from participation or levels of income. For this reason the concept of asset accumulation is an important one. Assets may be material capital (land, usufructory rights of important natural resources, savings, jewelery, livestock or other kinds of physical capital); human capital (education and skills); or social capital (organization ). Different categories of impoverishment can be identified from the crossclassification of income with asset accumulation. For example, people with relatively high income but low asset accumulation will be more vulnerable to unemployment or business downturns that pitchfork them inrto poverty, than people with lower incomes but enough assets to tide them over. Asset accumulation is therefore, particularly important to identifying poverty in terms of exposure to the risk or vulnerability.In summary, a number of dimensions of poverty can be usefully defined for analysing relationships between gender and poverty related to starvation (or absolute material poverty), subsistence, social coping and participation.Income levels and in the absence of other assets, the value of labor are essential determinants of absolute material well-being as well as the capability to achieve the minimum goods defined by the society in question, as necessary for subsistence. Beyond material survival, socio-ecological factors (race, gender, geographical location) can be as important as income in determining access to or exclusion from the things that society defines as important for well-being, as well as degrees of participation and powerlessness. A factor in the capability of individuals to cope with hardship and to manage risk is asset accumulation.The different roles, rights and resources that men and women have in society are an important determinant of the nature and scope of their poverty. These differences are culturally constructed and historically determined; they are supported by social organization and economic systems. As such they can change; and it is a widely held thesis that the allocation of work and the valuation of women's labor has to change if poverty is to be eliminated.The relationship between poverty and gender is especially important because of the positive effect that increasing women's incomes and education has on nutrition, child survival and, as child survival rates improve, on declining birth rates. When unwaged household production is valued , women's contribution is estimated at between 40-60 percent of total household income ( Goldschmidt-Clermont, 1987). This means that efforts to control population growth and provide employment for the poor must build on the provision of decent incomes and education for poor women.Different types of women experience different degrees of poverty or wealth in society. Third World rural women may be unpaid or paid family laborers, they may be wage laborers outside the household, independent or joint entrepreneurs involved in a small business or in trading, they may be landowners in their own right or jointly with relatives.It is therefore, erroneous to discuss Third World women and poverty as if there were one generic situation common to all women. Unfortunately however, there is a dearth of comparative studies which relate different types of women to corresponding levels and types of poverty taking into account the several dimensions of poverty discussed in the previous section, and also compares their poverty with that of men. This is a serious gap in the research.At present therefore, the best we can do is to draw together a series of observations based on individual studies, each of which offer some insights for the overall picture of gender-related poverty and inequality.A number of studies conducted in the last decade show that poverty and food availability depend women's income, because men and women spend income under their control in different ways. The level of women's income is substantially and positively related to household calorie availability, child health and survival. Women typically spend a high proportion of their income on food and health care for children. Men use a higher proprtion for their own personal expenditures(studies by von Braun and IFPRI). For example one study in Guatemala estimates that average yearly profits from nontraditional export crops would double household food expenditures if they were controlled by women rather than their husbands.Women's assets, participation and poverty.Unequal rights and obligations , heavy time pressure to do multiple jobs, lack of access to land, capital, and credit, low levels of participation in agricultural extension support programs, education and collective organizations all prevent women from achieving the same levels of productivity as men. Many studies show that plots of land controlled by women have lower yields than those controlled by men, because of lower access to technology and inputs like fertiliser as well as labor. The potential for growth and food security that could result from improving women farmers access to resources, technology and information are as large or larger in some cases than the gains the expected from breeding \"superplants\". For example, some estimates show that reducing the time burdens of women could increase household cash incomes by 10 %. Estimates of how much women farmers' yields could increase just by giving them the the same level of inputs and education as men farmers range from 7-24 percent .Technology transfer aimed at women has been largely restricted to a few of women's existing activities, in particular traditional work related to housekeeping and childcare (Carr,1993). For example, cooking stoves have received a vast amount of attention worldwide. There have been several large-scale initiatives, such as the UNIFEM global 'WAFT\" program, along with a vast number of projects attempting to provide improved technology to women in their traditional productive work, but \"the transfer of larger and more complex technologies to women has been virtually non-existent\" (Everts, 1998). At the same time, the record is mixed with respect to the unintended or indirect effects of new agricultural technologies on women; in some cases women have succeeded in adopting new varieties and other production technologies; in other cases women have been unable to process high yielding varieties developed without attention to postharvest qualities; in other cases, women laborers have been displaced by the introduction of high yielding varieties together with less labor intensive or more male laborusing technologies.The violence which affects the lives of poor women in the Third World is better documented now than it used to be and shows the many facets of their powerlessness in the most elementary respects: millions of female babies destroyed at or soon after birth such that there is a big \"population gap\" in female vs male births in the Third World (Chambers, 1996); the sale of young girls into forced labor, prostitution or as child brides; the ritual mutilation of female sexual organs; and physical violence used to control women's labor in the household. Other forms of social violence include abandonment of mothers to cope in female-headed households, denial of property rights.Poor rural women are highly vulnerable to deprivation in terms of nutrition, health, education, asset accumulation, skill building and participation in collective organization because they tend to provide the \"safety net\" which protects their children and household against catastrophic poverty. The foundation of this safety net function is the division of labor which allocates a disproportionate share of un-waged or under-waged household and family maintenance work to women. UNDP estimated the value of this type of work at $16,000 billion of global output, of this $11,000 billion worth was carried out by women (UN, 1995).Third world women's un-waged work includes activities that make it possible for laborers, small farms and businesses to work and produce at lower returns to labor and capital than would otherwise be possible: for example, cooking meals, fetching water and firewood, caring for the sick. One example illustrates this process: we costed the labor family women put into a single activity--cooking for field workers--in the course of production of a field crop at what it would cost the male head of household to hire a non-family member to do this task. The cost of hiring made the production of the crop unprofitable; and the conclusions of the economic analysis were borne out by the decisions of male producers in the community not to produce this crop if they did not have a family member to cook for the field workers (Ashby and Guerrero, 1985).A detailed case study carried out in Kenya illustrates a situation of which there a multiple examples: women are increasingly the sole providers of labor on farms, because men migrate to higher wage opportunities, and women's labor is of lower value in the labor market. The added pressure on women's time led to low labor productivity on farm, particularly in femaleheaded households where women neglected on-farm taks in order to hire out their labor to obtain income to meet the immediate food needs of the household (Mutoro, 1997) Another study suggests that women's small enterprises such as food processing and trading provide a similar \"safety net\" function. Most of the enterprises owned by women are very small (maximum 25 employees), have low profit margins, are part-time or seasonal and are frequently run from the home so as to be combined with household responsibilities. Female entrepreneurs often do not increase investment in one specialized activity in order to maximize growth in their business; instead they diversify to minimize risks to stabilize income which guarrantees basic food security. This safety-first orientation is often a response to the more risky strategies undertaken by other family members which are underwritten by the women's provision of a safety net (Downing,1991). This finding that innovators' risk taking in poor households is underwritten by the family, and in particular the provision of basic food security by women, is similar to the results of a study which examined the family background of poor farmers introducing risky new agricultural technologies and found that the early innovators were more likely to belong to extended families. The individual innovators were young men who did not own much land and who worked as sharecroppers or farm laborers, but who belonged to an extended family unit with asssets of land and household labor which enabled them as a group to absorb losses and cushion the individual from economic catastrophe. Young women did not have access to this pattern of familial support for agricultural innovation (Rivera and Ashby, 1985).The low value of women's time and women's work is an important reason why development efforts which provide technologies and income earning opportunities directed at women's traditional activities have to a very large extent, failed to have a significant impact. Unless there is an activity with a higher return to labor, which generates additional income and which does not undermine the \"safety net\" function of women's economic contribution to the household, there is no incentive for women to save time in traditional activities especially if this requires expenditure on new technology.Therefore one of the key interventions needed in poverty eradication is the identification of new opportunities for income generation which have superior returns to labor compared with women's traditional work. These need to be combined with support mechanisms for the \"safety net\" functions for the household provided by women's work and income.Several actors in the international development effort to eliminate poverty have taken important steps towards mainstreaming attention to gender and impact on poor rural women over the past three decades: in 1979 the UN Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women was adopted; in 1989 the declaration on violence against women followed; the Bejing declaration and platform for action formulated in 1995 at the Un Fourth World Conference on Women was another milestone. Other important commitments are stated in the World Bank since the publication of its paper \"Enhancing Women's participation in Economic Development\" in 1994, the OECD with its position statement \"Gender Equality: Moving towards Sustainable People-Centered Development made in 1995, and the European Union policy statement \"Integrating Gender Issues in Development Cooperation \" also issued in 1995. However, action lags far behind the statement of good intentions. For example, the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research, a $360 million consortium supported by the same donors who issued the above statements, integrated gender analysis as a program in its mainstream research agenda in 1996. A head count of the number of research studies considering gender reported shows a rise from 140 studies in 1995 to 227 in 1998. There is no reason for complacency about this steady improvement. An analysis of these studies shows that only 11 or 14% of the studies reported were specifically developing technology to benefit rural women.The full integration of gender analysis and the participation of men and women farmers as partners in international agricultural research and technology development requires a three pronged strategy that consists of:• catalysing collaborative research with the centers and partners, to generate sound evidence on the benefits in terms and impact of differentiating the needs of men and women as users of technology, and recognising their different contributions as participants in research ; • supporting capacity building with the Centers to increase skills and knowledge to use gender analysis effectively and appropriately • promoting information dissemination and exchange about best practices and lessons learned . Key elements of a proposal. If we are to take the phrase \"empowering women in agriculture\" as more than a cheap slogan, then we have to work from the foundation relationship between gender and the several dimensions of poverty outlined earlier.Mainstreaming gender into the existing research agenda will not be enough, if that agenda is systematically failing to take into account the sources of income and the assets that women in poor households depend on. Moreover, the effects of globalization which creates a pressing need to find alternative sources of income in situations where traditional means are no longer economically viable, require us to go beyond adjusting technology to fit with the traditional responsibilities and constraints faced by poor men and women farmers. We need to be actively looking at new alternatives in the global economy and the gender-differentiated needs for technology,skills and information required for a frontal attack on poverty.Strengthening the capacity of global agricultural research to take on this task has at least three important elements: 1. Link research institutions with existing sources of information and expertise so that researchers and client groups can readily access and make use of the large body of information on gender, agriculture and technology for women already in existence . These linkages need to focus on strong interactions between technology designers, technology producers (such as small scale artesans, some of whom may be women in the Third World) and technology users (see for an example, Everts, 1998) 2. Identify new livelihood opportunities for the poor in relation to a changing demand for agricultural technology which is analysed separately for men and for women.A coordinated diagnostic research initiative is needed to identify rapidly the priority geographical areas and populations in which genderdifferentiated research and technology development has potential for high payoff in combating poverty. This diagnosis needs to include:• Development of a GIS minimum database, using available data with expert input to identify areas of the world where women's special needs require priority attention • Design sample of areas using the GIS minimum data base to define priority geographic area for rapid appraisal of gender differentiated opportunities and needs.• In sampled areas, network with grassroots organizations and NGO's to select promising technology innovation opportunities for rural women 3. Research for technology development• Select priority entry points where research is needed to promote the development of innovative agricultural technology by and for rural women in selected areas, and the policy interventions needed to ensure access • Institutionalize regular technology evaluations by a network of gender differentiated user groups, as feedback to research on technology design.• Establish an interactive, user-friendly database on evaluations of technologies for women with appropriate institutions • Support regular review and exchange of results • Establish a regular consultation to update the diagnosis of needs and the evaluation of technologies, monitoring and evaluation of impact of gendered research.• Protecting women's traditional rights to land and other resources, including water, forest and grazing are essential. Often this requires participation in effective collective or community based organization . • In general women's access to collective organization for resource management, health and child care, credit, information, marketing and small enterprise development needs strong support. • Formal education and access to informal education and skill building is an essential ingredient of the effort to build women's access to secure non-traditional sources of income with forward linkages to improving child survival rates and decline in the birth rate."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0543982613.json b/main/part_2/0543982613.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a4fc2c377c85496e8265d936999f02ca74f929d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0543982613.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"22620d0e-42c2-41b0-9d35-36514d3e8a6b","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0548795316.json b/main/part_2/0548795316.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6ca93bcc56fbb8aa14927faa624573d7435be93 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0548795316.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1e2a78d5585d8a472813d754b8278448","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/82caac16-3fac-40fe-819f-be82a37d3feb/retrieve","id":"457384916"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d314cdcf-db26-47a1-97d3-5b31ec213b85","content":"The Alliance Bioversity-CIAT and The Latin American Fund for Irrigated Rice-FLAR have contributed to improving the quality of rice germplasm to strengthen rice production across Latin America. In Ecuador, the main variety adopted comes from the FLAR breeding program. Its adoption has been associated with lower production costs, greater probability of adopting other technologies, and better use of inputs.Contributing CRPs/Platforms:• Rice -Rice Contributing Flagships:• F1: Accelerating impact and equity • F5: New rice varieties Contributing Regional programs: Contributing external partners:• FLAR -Fondo Latinoamericano para Arroz de Riego Improved varieties of rice have been shown to increase production and diminish the cost of production, as well as provide stress-tolerance traits like resistance to weeds, pests, and diseases, or climate uncertainty, among other stress factors [1]. Nonetheless, identifying potential germplasm that develops into successfully improved varieties and their further dissemination is sometimes constrained by diverse bottlenecks. The public-private partnerships (PPP) represent an alternative to conduct participatory research and represent an opportunity for the development of the agricultural sector.Ecuador has become a dynamic experiment that presents an interesting case study of PPP initiatives that have achieved significant benefits for rice producers [2]. FLAR, with the Alliance as a strategic partner, and its partners INIAP and PRONACA, developed the SENACA FL09 and SENACA FL11 rice varieties in 2009 and 2011, respectively. In Ecuador, rice is the 3rd most important crop in relation to the total area cultivated, representing 12.7% of arable land in 2018. Regarding the varieties sowed, SFL 09 was used by 1 in 3 producers in 2014, while in 2019 SFL 11 occupied 61% of the sown area. According to the producers who used these varieties, one of the reasons for planting them was the high commercial demand, being preferred by the industry. In this regard, there are several determinants for the adoption of new varieties such as the area of cultivation and family work. Women's participation in decisions regarding crop production increases the likelihood of using improved varieties, as do other factors such as farm size, educational level, and household size."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0582080160.json b/main/part_2/0582080160.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b439ef804a500c3385d1ec693ae51ef1e2845eba --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0582080160.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"170ae4efec784ed2c1974f64eaa147b6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/973b9251-308c-41fc-b5a1-4563dc3c9ee6/retrieve","id":"723202820"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e36bc66a-969c-4cec-b1a6-7bde409cccfa","content":"CGIAR Technical Reporting has been developed in alignment with the CGIAR Technical Reporting Arrangement. This Initiative report is a Type 1 report and constitutes part of the broader CGIAR Technical Report. Each CGIAR Initiative submits an annual Type 1 report, which provides assurance on Initiative-level progress towards End of Initiative outcomes. The CGIAR Technical Report comprises:• Type 1 Initiative and Impact Area Platform reports, with quality assured results reported by Initiatives and Platforms available on the CGIAR Results Dashboard.• The Type 3 Portfolio Performance and Project Coordination Practice Change report, which focuses on internal practice change.• The Portfolio Narrative, which draws on the Type 1 and Type 3 reports, and the CGIAR Results Dashboard, to provide a broader view on portfolio coherence, including results, partnerships, country and regional engagement, and synergies among the portfolio's constituent parts.The CGIAR Technical Report constitutes a key component of the CGIAR Annual Performance Report (APR).Score 1: Significant: The activity contributes in a significant way to any of the three CGIAR climate-related strategy objectives -namely, climate mitigation, climate adaptation, and climate policy, even though it is not the principal focus of the activity.Score 1: Significant: The activity contributes in a significant way to any of the three CGIAR climate-related strategy objectives -namely, climate mitigation, climate adaptation, and climate policy, even though it is not the principal focus of the activity.Score 2: Principal: Gender equality is the main objective of the Initiative/project and is fundamental in its design and expected results. The Initiative/project would not have been undertaken without this gender equality objective.https://www.cgiar.org/initiative/26-her-harnessing-equality-for-resilience-in-theagrifood-system/ *The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) markers refer to the OECD DAC Rio Markers for Climate and the gender equality policy marker. For climate adaptation and mitigation, scores are: 0 = Not targeted; 1 = Significant; and 2 = Principal. The CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform has adapted the OECD gender marker, splitting the 1 score into 1A and 1B. For gender equality, scores are: 0 = Not targeted; 1A = Gender accommodative/aware; 1B = Gender responsive; and 2 = Principal. These scores are derived from Initiative proposals, and refer to the score given to the Initiative overall based on their proposal.The CGIAR Initiative on Gender Equality had a strong start in April 2022, with work initiated on boosting women's empowerment and resilience to climate change. Though a new Initiative for CGIAR, a team came together from nine CGIAR Centers (the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, CIP, ICARDA, IFPRI, IITA, ILRI, IRRI, IWMI and WorldFish)1 and collaborated on researching and identifying leverage points to provide tools, methods, and evidence for CGIAR's stakeholders on social, technological, economic, and governance approaches.In 2022, we implemented work at global, regional, and country levels. Our work cut across Eastern Africa, Middle Africa, Northern Africa, Southern Africa, Southern Asia, South-Eastern Asia, and Western Africa. Results were generated in the five focus countries of Ethiopia, Mali, Nigeria, Bangladesh, and India. We also began collaborations with partners in Malawi, Egypt, Tanzania, and The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam.The Gender Equality Initiative is uniquely placed within the CGIAR Initiatives because it is the only one dedicated to gender research. In 2022, we built the foundation for leading the way to find out how to stem the growing gender inequalities as a result of climate change -providing new conceptual framings, research results, insights, and solutions.Through improved production practices and breeds promoted by World Vision Ethiopia through the SPIR program, Metebe received training on poultry management, constructed a low-cost pen and purchased 12 improved breed chickens; she has begun earning a steady income from the egg sales, as well as consuming more eggs within her household. Photo credit: Aklilu Kassaye/World Vision Ethiopia Our theory of change (TOC) is based on research to reduce formal and informal barriers to equitable food systems, while enhancing the individual capacities, as well as ensuring the systems support the ability of women to thrive and contribute to vibrant communities. It is this understanding, which requires a consolidated approach at different levels, that is unique.With this conceptual framing in mind, 2022 was dedicated to initiating work in each of the four Work Packages of the Initiative. Because this Initiative wants to move the science into action, we also focused on setting up research on solutions. From the perspective of policies and governance systems, 2022 was dedicated to understanding how we can increase the voice and agency of women in decision-making and in developing solutions to climate change (Work Package 4). Recognizing that there are formal barriers for individual women often meant ensuring women could have access to resources and build their assets, as was done through research on making social protection more gender sensitive and effective (Work Package 3). Regarding informal systems, looking at how they can hold back the ability to grow and be empowered meant initiating innovative work within CGIAR on how to build sociotechnical innovation bundles (STIBs) that will empower women in the face of climate change (Work Package 2). Lastly, we started research on how gendered social norms limit empowerment and economic resilience in the context of climate change (Work Package 1).Progress on science is on track across all four Work Packages. In Work Package 1, work began on an evidence synthesis on restrictive social norms within food systems, and on developing a set of tools for qualitatively assessing norms in three value chains (cassava, chicken, and fish) which may limit women's ability to benefit from them. This is feeding into the Initiative's development of an index of multi-dimensional social norms in agrifood systems (AFS). This is important for future work across value chains and understanding how to ensure women benefit from food-systems transformations. In Work Package 1 we also worked on developing guidelines with a range of partners about how to measure gender-transformative change when testing gender-transformative approaches (GTAs) in agriculture and other domains. This is timely work, as more implementors embrace GTAs; being able to measure the change is a fundamental precondition to understanding it.Because a core area of work for CGIAR is developing innovations, in Work Package 2 we concentrated on identifying, designing, and promoting the uptake of context-specific, climate-smart STIBs to support women and youth empowerment. Research on the link between STIBs, empowerment, and resilience is new, and most studies have focused on production and productivity. This required a review of literature and evidence on STIBs, and the development of a TOC on the pathways that result in empowerment or resilience building through the use of STIBs. To support that, a protocol for generating an evidence gap map on the impacts of STIBs on women's empowerment and resilience was developed. Using the resilience and empowerment indicators developed for this output, we identified 85 socioeconomic datasets and tools related to bundling relevant sociotechnical innovations in different contexts. We are also excited about the research that was started in four 'living' labs to understand the way STIBs are combined and how they can lead to empowerment.Under Work Package 3, we worked on building a collaborative, multi-disciplinary approach to investigate which social-protection strategies and programs can support rural women in responding to climate change. This included progress on a conceptual framework and a strategic evidence review to identify promising program design features and high-priority evidence gaps. Work is underway on three quantitative case studies (in Ethiopia, Bangladesh, and Mali) on gendered impacts of social-protection programs in the context of climate change. Preliminary results show that social-protection programs can help protect well-being and support climate responses for extremely poor women and their households following extreme weather events. Through Work Package 1, lessons on GTAs were shared across the Initiative, leading to development of guidance on how GTAs can be incorporated into social protection.Because ensuring increased decision-making is a core solution to climate change, Work Package 4 investigated how to strengthen women's voice and agency in climate-related agrifood-systems governance at the community level. In 2022, our study in India highlighted how climate change can adversely affect women's voice and agency, and how women's representation can mitigate these effects. We have done the preparatory work for four randomized controlled trials of programming and policy approaches for increasing women's voice and agency -to be done in Nigeria, India, and Malawi. This will provide an informative basis for future projects on women's voice and agency. We also launched a conceptual framework for measuring women's empowerment in agrifoodsystems governance (WEAGov). Strategic evidence reviews on public and private-sector policies supporting women's resilience to climate change informed an additional evidence map. Finally, we analyzed the gender-responsiveness of privatesector voluntary sustainability systems in the agrifood sector and engaged with International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling (ISEAL) Alliance members and their network to help them adopt governance approaches that increase women's agency.To engage partners and challenge the Initiative to remain relevant, we convened a high-level dialogue in October 2022 in Nairobi, Kenya, to deliberate about solutions for gender equality and climate resilience in Africa. Participants included Gender Equality Initiative leadership and researchers, representatives from government, international non-governmental organization (NGOs), the United Nations (UN), donors, and other CGIAR researchers. Key messages included:• The need to gather data to provide evidence on gender dimensions of exposure to climate events, and adaptation and mitigation strategies.• The importance of focusing on gender equality during periods of economic and social transition.• The importance of women's voice and agency wherever decisions are made.• The role of large-scale programs in supporting women's ability to respond to climate change.• How evidence must shape priorities for financing for climate resilience.A woman works to prevent the inevitable ravages of flooding that arrive every year in Bangladesh. Teams from CGIAR's three Action Areas -System Transformation, Resilient Agrifood Systems and Genetic Innovation -worked to develop an improved set of Action Area outcomes in October 2022. Since this was near the end of the reporting cycle for 2022, it was decided not to update the theories of change based on these new Action Area outcomes. The exception to this is Genetic Innovation -for this Action Area, as the new outcomes had already been widely discussed among the relevant Initiatives, and with its advisory group of funders and other stakeholders, the decision was made to update their outcomes in time for the 2022 reporting cycle.In Nigeria, 18 stakeholder groups from national agencies, civil society organizations, the private sector, farmer associations, and academic institutions have gained a better understanding of normative constraints in the cassava, chicken, and fish value chains. In Tanzania, the same types of stakeholders will be targeted for capacity strengthening in 2023. This is a foundational step toward identifying leverage points and levers to intervene in the local AFS to address normative constraints, and to design and pilot GTAs in the two countries.The 2The annual progress aligns with the Plan of Results and Budget. Outputs 2.1-2.4 are the foundation for output 2.5 and will be completed in Q1/Q2 2023. This is the basis for generating outputs 2.6-2.9.3The annual progress aligns with the Plan of Results and Budget. Output 3.1 will be completed in Q1/Q2 2023 rather than Q4 2022. This does not impact other outputs. The other outputs will be completed in 2023 as per the initial timeline.The annual progress aligns with the Plan of Results and Budget. As originally planned, outputs This section provides an overview of 2022 results reported by the Gender Equality Initiative. These results align with the CGIAR Results Framework and Gender Equality Initiative's theory of change. Further information on these results is available through the CGIAR Results Dashboard.Results by region The Gender Equality Initiative is unique as one of the first collaborative, multi-center, independently funded gender-research projects within CGIAR -so we made a conscious decision to work with external partners we had already collaborated with, and to take the opportunity to identify and work with new partners during 2022. Both strategies have been very successful. By the end of the year, we had collaborated with 31 organizations outside CGIAR to deliver our outputs. These ranged from international and national research organizations and universities, NGOs, and local government, to UN agencies. This section illustrates some of the key partnerships.Since understanding norms is knowledge intensive, the Work Package 1 team on GTAs and norms reached out to a long-standing knowledge partner, KIT Royal Tropical Institute. In addition, it also expanded the partnership to include FHI 360, because they are experts in measuring norms and have country offices in Tanzania and Nigeria. This was important to design and pilot GTAs. To ensure links with policy-level actors, Work Package 1 partnered with the JP GTA partners from the Rome-based Agencies (the FAO, WFP, and the International Fund for Agricultural Development).Under Work Package 2 on empowerment through STIBs and the four living labs, four new partners were identified for the range of technologies they develop. These included two other CGIAR Initiatives and two external partners -WorldVeg and ICAR-IVRI.For Work Package 3, the team continued collaboration with long-standing partners WVI and Dadimos Development Consultants PLC to test a new approach to promoting women's engagement in sustainable land-management practices, within the Strengthen PSNP5 Institutions and Resilience program in Ethiopia. The Gender Equality Initiative's team is represented on WVI's research advisory council (Food Security and Livelihoods). Work Package 3 also expanded its outreach to key stakeholders interested in evidence on the intersection of social protection, gender, and climate, including the WPF, FAO, ILO, the World Bank, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, and UNICEF.Work Package 4 worked with a long-standing partner, ActionAid Nigeria, to leverage their expertise in civic education and community mobilization -together we developed curricula on community decision-making and their subsequent dissemination. To expand the sphere of influence beyond CGIAR, Work Package 4 also started building a partnership with APRNet in Nigeria (an NGO network with a broad membership of agricultural research policy stakeholders) and with the ISEAL network (who want to better understand how gender is integrated in their members' sustainability standards for agriculture and food sectors).Section 5 Impact pathway integration -External partners Section 6 Impact pathway integration -CGIAR portfolio linkages Portfolio linkages and Gender Equality's impact pathways Regarding the internal collaborations, the Gender Equality Initiative made a very conscious decision to identify a limited number of Initiatives to work with. This was because there was a sense among other Initiatives that by working with Gender Equality Initiative, they would be able to say that they had \"covered\" doing gender research. This approach allows for the Gender Equality Initiative to be the gender-strategic research project of the CGIAR. In line with this, the Initiative is collaborating with the GENDER Impact Platform on GTAs. We are also collaborating with the CGIAR Initiative on Livestock and Climate, and the CGIAR Initiative on Low-Emission Food Systems as one of the learning labs under our Work Package 2, to understand how to ensure their STIBs will empower women. For Effective partnerships between research and implementation teams play a crucial role in developing high-quality research, providing evidence to improve programs for better outcomes. This is well illustrated through our long-standing collaboration with WVI in Ethiopia, where the Gender Equality Initiative's researchers have contributed to the evidence base on how multisectoral graduation model social-protection programs can reduce poverty, improve livelihoods and well-being, and strengthen women's and youth empowerment.The Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP) in Ethiopia is the country's flagship social safety-net program, providing seasonal food and cash transfers to poor households directly or after the people participate in public works projects. The Strengthen PSNP4 Institutions and Resilience (SPIR) Development Food Security Activity in Ethiopia was a five-year program (2016-2021) led by WVI that supported implementation of the fourth phase of PSNP. In addition, SPIR provided additional multisectoral 'graduation model' programming focused on improving livelihoods, nutrition outcomes, women's and youth empowerment, and climate resilience. IFPRI -under the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Marketswas the lead research partner for SPIR and conducted the program's impact evaluation.As a follow-on to SPIR, the SPIR II Resilience Food Security Activity was officially launched in late 2021 as a five-year program funded through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and led by WVI (see reference 2). This program supports implementation of the fifth phase of the PSNP in the Amhara and Oromia regions, and includes renewed targeting focused on the extreme poor. SPIR II has the same core complementary programming delivered under SPIR, but with many revamped approaches -particularly relating to improving maternal and child nutrition, and improving women's capacity to mitigate climaterelated risks. Based on the successful past collaboration and the strength of the SPIR evaluation, WVI asked the Gender Equality Initiative, through IFPRI, to join SPIR II as a learning partner.In 2022, the collaboration continued, and Gender Equality Initiative's researchers provided evidence on how social-protection programs could be designed to increase women's participation in sustainable land-management practices. The Initiative's researchers worked with WVI to design and evaluate an intervention to increase women's participation in these practices, and strengthen their resilience to climate-related shocks. We conducted a formative qualitative study on gender and participation in sustainable land-management practices under SPIR II. The key findings included understanding households' adoption of the practices, barriers to women's participation, and the potential for scaling up income generation through those activities (see reference 3). For example, the study suggests that fruit-tree cultivation and composting are promising sustainable land-management technologies, but that high labor requirements are an obstacle to women using them.Going forward, WVI wants to use the evidence the Initiative generated to inform its future programming. These findings will ground the approach taken by WVI, so that they can makeA list of abbreviations and acronyms used throughout the report can be found here.Gender-transformative approaches evidence-based decisions and design interventions that maximize the benefits of sustainable landmanagement public works activities for women (see reference 4). These activities will be administered as part of the SPIR initiative and will be extended initially to over 2,000 households, with plans for potential future scaling up. It is expected that this new intervention, designed using the findings of our formative study, will lead to sustainable outcomes that will help improve the well-being of Ethiopian communities in the future.\" This mutually beneficial relationship will serve to generate evidence on gender dimensions of climate-related shocks and evaluate promising gender-sensitive adaptation strategies. The evidence generated through this collaboration will inform the implementation of the SPIR II project and future graduation model social-protection programs in similar contexts. \"Michael Mulford, Chief of Party of SPIR II, WVI Ethiopia"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0582732917.json b/main/part_2/0582732917.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f469516f9eee56ae5be736f5d53a5cb2acfbf77 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0582732917.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"62c02616a27f4fb0c6a6cdba819dff0d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7dcff053-9c42-4745-aaea-e7ccdc14bc6b/retrieve","id":"1644160134"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d1c2a3b8-359f-499e-95bb-b1c2cd0822f6","content":"For distribution to Village Information Centres (VICs) in bean growing areas in eastern, central and southern Africa. UI'lICA .' Di: I 1 O .. MACION y Dv\\.UMlIIIACIONAgriculture (SUA) and some private companies (e.g., Kibo Trading Ca.) (Table 1).Participants included farmer groups from nearby participating villages, llon-participating farmers "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0621911048.json b/main/part_2/0621911048.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cd5a99fb35d4d0d6aced1739b35fa047308eae0f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0621911048.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ddf30a233b0803a75d28fdce8afc91e6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/772ee7d0-440b-4251-a9f3-7ff052d06068/retrieve","id":"-127287539"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d0aa465b-5043-4fc6-afc0-aa57e9642c80","content":"Eleven whitefly species are reported attacking cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) from Latin America, Africa and Asia They cause damage to cassava as direct-feeding pests and vectors of plant viruses. There are three major species attacking cassava: Aleurotrachelus socialis, Aleurothrixus aepim and Bemisia tabaci (Bellotti et al, 1999) A. socialis and A. aepim cause considerable direct-damage yield losses in the northem part of South America and Brazil. A . socialis is predominant in Colombia, Venezuela and Ecuador, while A. aepim is found in high populations, causing yield losses in northeast Brazil. These areas are dominated by small cassava farmers with limited resources. Bemisia tabaci, the vector of African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD), has a pantropical distribution, feeding on cassava throughout Africa, several countries in Asia, and more recently in the neotropics.Host Plant Resistance (HPR) offers a sustainable solution for reducing whitely damage; however, whitefly resistance in agricultura} crops is rare. A recent review of the literature indicates that whitefly resistance has been evaluated across a wide range of crops including vegetables, fruits, legumes, cotton, melons, tabacco, potato, squashes and alfalfa Results show that only low levels of resistance, often expressed as crop or varietal \"preference vs. non-preference,\" ha ve been observed.The higb levels ofresistance that we are finding in cassava germplasm are unique. The research on HPR at CIAT, with support from New Zealand's MFAT as part of the CGIAR Systemwide Whitefly IPM Project, is an invaluable contribution to achieving and understanding the mechanism ofwhitefly resistance in agricultural crops. This unique research on the genetics ofthis resistance could lead to important advances in achieving HPR, not only in cassava, but also other important agricultural crops.Over the last 4 years, CORPOICA, the Colombian Institute of Agronomy, has been evaluating high-yielding, whitefly-resistant hybrids developed by CIAT at CORPOICA field researcb stations. The hybrid CG 489-31 is a progeny of a MEcu 72 (Resistant) x MBra 12 (Tolerant) cross (See 1999 Progress Report; MF AT), which combines high yield, whitefly resistance, and excellent eating quality. lt will be released to farmers in Colombia during 2001. The hybrid is presently being multiplied so that sufficient planting material (stakes or cuttings) will be available to farmers.The CIAT cassava germplasm bank contains 6000 landrace varieties collected mostly from farmers' fields across the neotropics, the origin of Manihot esculenta. More than 5000 varieties have been evaluated for whitefly resistance at severa! sites in Colombia. Approximately 13 varieties have been selected with moderate to high levels of resistance, and form the basis of our whitefly resistance breeding program (See Table 1 ). MEcu 72 continues to be our most resistant variety.An outbreak of the :frog-skin virus disease at CIAT and other regions of Colombia rendered evaluations ofthe remaining varieties (approximately 1000 varieties) difficult during 2000. Frogskin infected varieties cannot be moved off of the CIAT station and must be destroyed. Nonetheless, during 2000 approximately 450 cassava cultivars were field evaluated for whitefly resistance and the results are included in this report. Many of the cultivars are hybrids from the cassava germplasm development program. In spite of high whitefly populations and heavy selection pressure, approximately 7% (30 cultivars) had very low damage ratings and more than 20% (91 cultivars) displayed low to moderate levels of resistance. These results indicate that whitefly resistance is being successfully introduced into cassava germplasm, and eventually will be available to small farmers in developing countries where cassava is a major staple. Dueto the importance ofthe whitefly as a pest and virus vector, it is necessary to know about the nature of genes that confer resistance to whiteflies. Therefore, the Fl segregation of crosses made with MEcu 72, the resistant genotype, using molecular markers, would help isolate and identify resistant genes. Two hundred and eighty two seeds from a MEcu 72 and a MCol 2246 (susceptible) cross were planted in pots and evaluated in the greenhouse. Simple sequence repeats (SSR's ) are being used to find markers associated with resistance for mapping and ultimately cloning ofresistant genes. The SSR's are random repeat sequences across all eukaryotic genome. SSR's show bigh polymorphism, are locus-specific and multiallelic; they exhibit a Mendelian inheritance and are also codominant. A high percentage (>60%) of polymorphism was found between parents MEcu 72 and MCol 2246 and 130 polymorphic SSR's have been obtained from the parents. Segregation from the SSRs and greenhouse evaluation will contribute to the construction of a linkage map for whitefly resistance in cassavaThis research is critica! to understanding the mechanisms ofwhitefly resistance, and combined with a knowledge of the genetics of resistance, will pro vide the basis for incorporating HPR for whitefly into agricultura! crops.Efforts are now underway to combine the resistance to the viral disease, such as ACMD, with resistance to the whitefly in cassava. ACMD free, virus resistant, gennplasm has been brought to CIAT from liTA. Crosses are being made with whitefly resistant germplasm at CIAT. Progeny can be evaluated for whitefly resistance at CIA T, however materials will ha ve to be sent to Africa for evaluation of virus resistance.In addition, liT A scientists ha ve now requested whitefly resistant germplasm from CIA T to introduce into African varieties. Resistant germplasm is presently being prepared in tissue culture form for introduction into Africa. Introduction Whiteflies, considered one of the world's major agricultural pests, are particularly damaging to crops in the tropical regions ofthe world. Eleven species are reported on cassava: A/eurotrachelus socia/is, Tria/eurodes variabilis, Bemisia tubercu/ata, Aleurothrixus aepim, Bemisia tabaci, Bemisia argentifo/ii, Trialeurodes abutiloneus, Aleurodicus dispersus, Paraleyrodes sp., Aleuronudus sp. and Tetra/eurodes sp. The whitefly complex reported from other crops, such as vegetables, fruits, cotton and legumes, is too extensive to list. However, important species coUected from the Andean region of South America include Bemisia tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum.B. tabaci has a pantropical distribution, feeding on numerous crops throughout the tropical regions of the world. If feeds on cassava throughout Africa where it is the vector of ACMD (Africa Cassava Mosaic Disease, caused by severa! geminiviruses), and is also reported from India and Malaysia Since the early 1990's a new biotype (B) of B. tabaci, considered by sorne a separate species (B. argentifolil) has been found feeding on cassava in the neotropics. Recent reports, and personal observations, indicate that B. tabaci is feeding on cassava in several areas of Brazil, Northem South America, Central America and the Caribbean. Although ACMD has not been reported from the Americas it is considered that ACMD now poses a more serious threat to cassava production, as most traditional cultivars in the regions are highly susceptible to the disease. In addition, the B. tabaci biotype complex is the vector of severa! virus of crops, especially vegetables and legumes, that are often grown in association with cassava, posing a potential threat for these viruses to move to cassava.Whiteflies cause direct damage to cassava and other crops by feeding on the phloem of leaves (Photo 1), inducing chlorosis and leaffall, which can result in crop loss. Yield losses ofthis type are common owing to A. socialis and A. aepim, feeding on cassava in Colombia, and Brazil respectively. There is a correlation between duration of wbitefly attack and root loss; losses o ver 70% have been reported from Colombia, and over 40% from Brazil.Two cassava viruses are known to be transmitted by wbiteflies. ACMD is caused by several geminiviruses transmitted by B. tabaci ACMD is reported causing crop losses of 28-40% (159, 160) from all African cassava producing countries. Resistance to ACMD has been introduced into cassava germplasm; however outbreaks ofthe disease still occur in regions of Africa Severe crop losses dueto ACMD have occurred in recent years in East Africa, especially in Uganda. Bemisia tubercu/ata is the reported vector of cassava frog-skin disease in the neotropics. Tbis disease is causing considerable yield loss in northem South America, especiaUy in Colombia The combination of direct whitefly feeding damage and its threat as a vector of virus diseases, both resulting in considerable crop losses, justify a continued strong research effort on whiteflies of cassava.Complementary to the research in cassava to determine and employ resistance to wbiteflies, a project was designed to determine the complex of indigenous South American parasitoids and other natural enemies. After nearly three years of surveys (in severa! countries such as Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela) numerous parasitoid species (more than 10) have been identified. Severa! ofthese are new or unrecorded species and are being identified by taxonomists. In addition studies are in progress to determine the efficacy of these parasitoids and their interaction with whitefly resistant germplasm. The results ofthese surveys for natural enemies are not included in this report but they are available upon request. Photo l. Wbitefty (A. socialis) adults feeding on tbe under suñace ofyoung, apical cassava leaves.Whitefly populations on cassava during the 1999-2000 growing season continued to remain high at CIA T. As studies during 1999 (Photo 2) (See IP3 Annual Report, 1999) indicated, the predominant species is A/eurotrache/us socia/is, which accounts for 98.5% of the population. Bemisia tuberculata and Trialeurodes variabilis account for the remaining 1.5%. Whitefly populations were so high and extensive (all cassava plots/fields were heavily infested) throughout the CIAT farm that it was impossible to carry out experiments on other pests or almost any other type of cassava experiments (i.e. agronomic or physiological). In addition, the species B. tuberculata is reported as a vector of cassava frog skin virus disease. This disease is also endemic at CIA T, with high incidence and most varieties/fields being infested.The combination of high whitefly populations and frog skin disease has rendered cassava field research at CIAT impractical. Land outside of CIAT, in areas where there is scarce cassava plantings and low whitefly populations, has been obtained to produce pest and disease free cassava for entomological experimentation. Clean cassava plants are required for host-plant resistance mechanism studies with A. socialis and B. tabaci and for the maintenance of pest and parasitoid studies with mealybugs and whiteflies and predator research with mites.Whitefly population eruptions and epidemiology is not well documented and understood. A. socia/is has been observed and collected on the CIA T furm for more than 25 years. However it is only in the past 5 years that populations have reached epidemic proportions. This could be due to several factors, sorne not well understood:w Most cassava germplasm planted at CIA T is susceptible.w Cassava has been continually grown at CIA T for more than 30 years., Environmental conditions, especially adequate to high rainfall, are favorable for whitefly population increases.\"'The staggered planting pattem followed at CIAT, where cassava plantings are programmed almost continually throughout the year, provides a continuum ofyoung, vigorous foliage that is preferred for oviposition and feeding.\" Pesticides use in the Germplasm Bank and on other experimental fields may have caused an unbalance in the pest-natural enemy relationship.\"' A new \"biotype\" of A. socia/is, that is particularly aggressive and with a high reproductive capacity may have been inadvertently introduced into the region.The third factor; the high rainfall pattem of recent years is considered to be the major factor for increased populations. Number 6, the introduction ofa new biotype is least favored ofthe reasons indicated.Photo 2. The popal stage of the whiteOy species Aleurotrachelus socialis and Trialeurodes variabilis on cassava leaves.There is conflicting information in the literature on sorne aspects of A. socialis biology. This is especially true for female ovipositional rates whicb are reported at 116 eggs per female tbrougbout its 12 day adult duration.A. socia/is eruptions and extremely higb populations, observed in recent years at CIA T and otber localities, indicate tbat ovipositional rates may be higber than reported.A small experiment was designed to try to more accurately measure female A. socialis oviposition. A 9x 1.5cm (diameter x heigbt) plastic petri disb, witb a perforated lid (to prevent moisture build up, wbich can cause adult wbitefly mortality) was filled with agar to within 2mm ofthe top. Upon cooling, a cassava leaf portion (Var. MCo1 1468) was placed on the agar. A pair of recently emerged wbitefly adults was introduced into each petri dish, in the laboratory (25±2°C & 70±5%RH). Three hundred replicates of each treatment werc evaluated for oviposition for 30 days.Females oviposited (Photo 3) for a maximum of 18 days. Previous report indicated a 12-day adult duration. Maximum and mínimum ovipositional rates varied considerably indicated by tbe high standard deviation. Accumulated oviposition reached a high of244 eggs, an average of 181 anda mínimum of t 55 (Table 2) (Figure 1 ). These results show that A. socialis oviposition is higher than previously recorded (1 16 eggs per female) and partially accounts for the rapid population builds-up we observed in the field. In recent years, B. tabaci, the vector of African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD), has been collected feeding on cassava in the neotropics. ACMD has not been observed in the Americas, and it has been speculated that its absence may ha ve been related to the inability of its vector, B. tabaci to feed on cassava. Since the early 1990' s a new biotype (B) of B. tabaci (considered by sorne investigators to be a separate species, B. argentifolii) has been found feeding on cassava in severa! areas ofthe neotropics, including Brazil, Ecuador, Colombia and several countries in the Caribbean region. ACMD, therefore, now poses a more serious threat, as most traditional varieties in the neotropics are susceptible to the disease.During 1999 (See Previous Report) we were able to confirm, with greenhouse studies that the B biotype of B. tabaci will feed and reproduce on cassava. However it was difficult to establisb the colony since B. tabaci was being collected from beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), a species very distant from cassava It was therefore decided to establish a colony on Poinsettia (Euphorbia palcherrima). Poinsettia was chosen since, in addition to being a reported host of B. tabaci, it is of the Euphorbiaceae Family and shares commonalties with cassava.A working colony was established on poinsettia by placing pupae from the bean colony onto poinsettia lea ves in 1m x 1m nylon mesh cages in the greenhouse. Using this technique it was possible to establish a now flourishing colony on poinsettia. In collaboratlon with the virology unit, and using the RAPD's-PCR technique, it has been possible to generate molecular markers for whitefly biotype identification. The B. tabaci colony from poinsettia readily took to J gossypiifolia plants and a colony was quickly established. This colony will be allowed to complete at least two cycles on J gossypiifolia before transferring it to cassava. Preliminary observations indicate that this J gossypiifolia colony will more easily establish on cassava.As part ofthe MFAT whitefly resistance project a student from a local Colombia University has been contracted to do on MS degree thesis to evaluate B. tabaci feeding, oviposition and development on whitetly resistant (to the species Aleurotrachelus socialis) and susceptible cassava cultivars.Cassava germplasm from several sources was evaluated for whitefly resistance during the 1999-2000 crop cycle at CIA T. Due to the heavy infestation of :frog skin disease in CIAT germplasm, it was not possible to introduce this germplasm into the CORPOICA, Nataima station for evaluation at that site. Germplasm evaluated included core collection, crossing blocks, multiplication and yield trial materials. All were planted in collaboration with the cassava germplasm improvement project, sown at CIA T and subjected to high field populations of A. socialis. Emphasis was given to those varieties/cultivars that had not been previously evaluated, had few evaluations or had received very low damage ratings in previous evaluations. Approximately 450 materials were evaluated.A considerable portion of the germplasm evaluated were hybrids (CM & SM) while others were :from the core collection, mostly MBra (Brazil), MCol (Colombia), MEcu (Ecuador), MGua (Guatemala), and MMex (Mexico ). The hybrids evaluated were developed for severa! ecosystems, such as the lowland tropics, acid-soil savannas and inter-andean valleys and also include materials for genetic mapping, whitefly resistance mapping, post harvest root deterioration and phytophthora and bacteriosis rnapping.Periodic evaluations for plant damage and whitefly populations were made throughout the crop cycle. A 1 to 6 damage scale ( 1 = no damage, 6 == severe damage) (Photo 4) is used to measure whitetly damage, anda 1 to 6 scale is also used to measure whiteíly populations (Table 3).Pboto 4. Cassava leaf damage symptoms caused by wbitefly (Aieurotrachelus socialis) Damage scale 1 = no leaf damage 2 = young leaves still green but slightly flaccid 3 = sorne twisting of young lea ves, slight leaf curling 4 = apicalleaves curled and twisted; yellow-green mottled appearance 5 = same as 4, but with \"sooty mold\" and yellowing of lea ves 6 = considerable leaf necrosis and defoliation, sooty mold on mid and lower leaves and young stems.Results show that whitet1y populations at Cli\\T were cxtremely high and caused considerable selection pressure on the cassava clones. Of the 449 clones evaluated, more than 50% had a damage rating above 4.0, and 86% above 3.0 (Figure 2). However, in spite of the high selection pressure, 30 cultivars (6.6%) presented no damage symptorns, and 35 cultivars had low damage ratings (between 2.0 and 3.0) on the 1 to 6 damage scale. Ninety-one cultivars hada damage rating below 3.5, indicating that they will be re-evaluated in subsequent planting cycles.In general the hybrid clones presented very low damage ratings (Table 4). This table includes those clones and cultivars that received a damage rating below 3.5 and will be re-evaluated. Approximately 64% of these are represented by hybrids (SM -47, 51.6% and CM = 11 , 12%) of the germplasm accessions, MCol represents 15% and MEcu and MPer 6% each. These resultsindicate that there is a good basis for resistance to whitellies in Andean germplasm, a phenomenon that has been noted in previous evaluations. These results also reinforce previous observations that the cultivar MECU 72 continues to display high levels of resistance, even undcr high levels of whitefly selection pressure (Photo 5). Sterile male 3.0 3.0 Pupae on lea ves of mid 1/3 of plan t. 2 Pupae on lea ves of lower !tí of plant.Photo 5. WhiteOy (A. socialis) populations on two cassava varieties; ME cu 72 is the resistant variety with few whiteOy adults and immatures is compared witb a susceptible variety.The research for resistance to cassava whitetlíes (especially the species Aleurntrachelus sorialis) has been an important segment of the cassava research program for several years. This research has heen successful in identizying numerous cultivars wíth resistance to whitetlies (whitefly resistance in agricultural crops is rare) and in developing commercial hybrids with resistance.From 1992 to present, 5363 genotypes have been field evaluated for whitetly damage/resistance at four different sites in Colombia (Figure 3). The bulk of these screening have been at two sites, CIAT and the CORPOICA station in Nataima, Tolima. The results of these evaluations, which include both plant damage and whitefly population ratings, are contained in a database and available to researchers. In the case of numerous (most) clones, more than one evaluation has been made; the highest score received is considered the most important and frrst that appears in the data bank.Of the 5363 genotypes screened, 3897 (73%) have received a damage rating above 3.5 (1 = no damage, 6 = severe damage) and are considered susceptible (Figure 3). No further evaluations are planned for these materials. The remaining 1466 genotypes (27%) with damage ratings below 3.5 are considered \"promising\" and will continue to be evaluated. Emphasis will be given first to those materials with damage rating below 2.0 (479 or 8.9%). Most of these are prohahly escapes, i.e. selection pressure was not su:fficiently high enough to get an accurate evaluation.Approximately 44% of the materials evaluated are hybrids (Figure 4). This figure has increases considerably in recent years as more crosses and subsequent hybrids are being produced by the germpJasm development project and many ofthese are screened for arthropod resistance, especially whiteflies, mites and tbrips.Germplasm (landrace varieties) fro m severa l other countries have also been screened and can be appreciated in Figures 4 and 5. Based on present results, since much of the whitefly resistant germplasm has originated in the Andean zone, increased emphasis will be given to accessions from Ecuador and Peru.Landrace varieties have been collected from numerous countries, especially in the neotropics and these ha ve been included in the CIA T germplasm bank. These accessions ha ve also been systematically screened. The highest number are from Colombia 1030 (33.6%) of the 3038 accessions screened (Figure 4). Colombia is followed by Brazil (167 or 5.5%), Venezuela (118 or 3.9%) and, finally, Ecuador (115 or 3.8%). To determine the life cycle duration of A. socialis on 7 cassava genotypes. 2.To evaluate whitefly behavior, genotype interaction. 3.To measure whitefly survival (mortality) on resistant vs. susceptible cassava genotypes.These studies were done at CIAT in growth (environmental) chambers where temperature (Average 27°C), humidity (68% RH) and photo period (12:12, daylight/night), were controlled throughout the experiment.The cassava varieties selected fo r the evaluation were MEcu 72, MEcu 64, MPer 317, MPer 611, MPer 415, MPer 335, all resistant to A. socialis and the susceptible control variety CMC 40. Four potted plants of each variety were infested with whiteflies from the CIAT colony. lnfestation was accomplished by attaching small (2.5 cm diameter) clip-cages (five per plant) to cassava leaves. Ten whitetly (A. socialis) females were introduced into each cage and allowed to oviposit for 24 hours after which cages and adults were removed. The whitetly infested plants were maintained in the growth charnber and watered regularly.To study the hiological cycle, 50 whitefly eggs per plant were selected and an ''infestation map\" was designed so that daily evaluations of eggs, nymphal instars and pupae could be easily accomplished. A total of 1400 whitefly individuals on 7 cassava varieties were constantly observed and evaluated throughout the experiment. Daily evaluations were made by observing the leaf undersurface with the aid of a stereo-rrucroscope. In order to minimalize leaf damage and not disturb nor injure whitefly imrnatures, a method was devised to least disturb developing nymphs.The potted plants are inverted on an iron support ring attached to an iron rod that allows upward/downward movement for optimal positioning for observance with the stereo-microscope.A rubber plate inserted at the hase of the plant stem at the soil line, prevents soil loss or plant movement and injury when the potted plant is inverted.Daily observation noted changes in instars (molting) at each stage ofwhitefly development as wel1 as individual mortality and the possible cause of mortality.The totallife cycle of egg to pupae of A. soda/is on the 7 cassava varieties ranged from 33 .9 to 37.4 days (Table 5). 7). Mortality was most severe during the nymphal stages, but also occurred during the egg stage and pupae (IV instar). In most cases, the highest mortality occurred during the frrst instar and lowest during the egg stage. The primary feeding stages are 1st through 3rd instar and all of the resistant clones, with the exception of MPer 611 , highest mortality occurred during these three instars. There was relatively high pupal mortality observed on MEcu 64 and MPer 611 (Table 7). On varieties such as MEcu 64, MEcu 72 and MPer 415, frrst instar nymphs express difficulty in \"'fDdng\" themselves to the leafundersurface to initíate feeding. These nymphs quickly dry up and fall from the leaf surface.These trials will he repeated on sorne of the aforementioned varieties a~ well as other varíeties. ln addition, trials will be designed to measure whitetly feeding and survival over severa! generations on the same clone. The fact that mortality was considerably higher on the resistant clones than on Activity VI. ldentificat ion of genomic regions responsible for conferr ing resistance to wbiteOy in cassava Different sources of resistance to white tly have heen reported (CIAT, 1995). The most important source of resistance genes was a genotype MEcu 72. Due to the importance of the whitefly as a pest and virus vector, we have initiated genetic studies to understand the inheritance of the resistance to the whitefly in genotypes like MEcu 72 and to tag the resistance gene (s). For this purpose we are analyzing the Fl segregation of cross the MEcu 72 (resistant genotype) x any very susceptible genotype, using molecular markers. This would help to accelerate selection of resistant materials to whiteflies and also to isolate resistant genes.An F 1 population of 282 individuals from the cross MEcu72 X Mcol2246 were used for this study with the former being the identified source of resistance to white fly and the latter the susceptible parent. In addition, Mcol2246 though being susceptible to whitefly infestation is resistant to other pests like mite and thrips and also flowers quite copiously.Genomic DNA from these 282 F 1 individuals was isolated from fresh young leaves using a slightly modified method adapted :from Dellaporta et al. (1983). Tissue from these young leaves were macerated in liquid nitrogen and 0.3g of this put in a l.Sml eppendorf tube containing lrnl of lOOmM Tris-HCl, 50mM EDTA, 500mM NaCI, 1.25% SOS and 0.38g/ml Sodium Bisulphite. This mixture was incubated for 45 minutes at 60°C followed by the addition of 0.4ml of 5M Potassium Acetate and subsequently placed on ice for 30 minutes. This was followed by centrifugation in a Sorvall Table top Centrifuge maintained at 4°C at 4000rpm for 1 O minutes. The supernatant was decanted and the nucleic acids then precipitated by the addition of one volume of isopropanol and 1/ 10 volume of Sodium Acetate (pH 5.2). An incubation period of 15 minutes at -80°C followed . A:fter this low temperature incubation, the mixture was again centrifuged ata temperature of 4°C in a Sorvall Table Top Centrifuge at 12000rpm tor 5 minutes and the supermtant decanted. The pellets were then washed in 70% ethanol, which was also decanted. The pellets were re-suspended in lOOJ.!l TE buffer. The integrity ofthe DNA was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis ofthe aliquots.Seeds from these 282 F1 individuals were planted in plastic dishes filled with sterile soil and left to grow for 6 to 8 weeks under greenhouse conditions with the temperature maintained at approximately 30°C. The seedlings were then transferred to the field for multiplication.For the greenhouse evaluations, the planting materials were rapidly multiplied in vitro in order to generate enough propagules in a short time, approximately 3 months. This is a significant reduction from the 6 months it normally takes to obtain stakes for planting from cassava stems when grown in the field. Also, this helped to obtain relatively cleaner planting materials.In vitro propagation methodology developed by Esco bar ( 1991) will be u sed in the present work. This methodology is based in cutting plant tips, which are transferred to the lab, disinfected first by washing them with sterile deionized water, ethanol 70%, hypochlorite 0,25% and fmally washed three times with sterile deionized water. The tips are cultured in 4E medium (Roca, 1984) in 16 ml assay tubes. The calculated growing period will be from 60 to 80 days. .FoUowing this period a second in vitro propagation in 4E medium in 100 mi small flasks will be performed for increasing the material amount per clone. 1\\fter this we will cut the tips of each clone for culturing in 17N rooting medium (Roca, 1984), during 30-40 days. Finally the plants will be transferred to the greenhouse.Pboto 6. Greeobouse screeoing of potted cassava plaots to evaluate wbitefly (A. socialis) feediog damage aod ovipositioo.This methodology will allow the conservation of material under optimal health conditions, and it will supply sufficient material in a reduced space.The parents MEcu 72, MCol 2246 and their offspring will be evaluated in the greenhouse with the \"clip cage\" methodology which consist in two polyethylene cylinders of different height joined by forceps. Both cylinder bases are covered by muslin, and thc highest cylinder has a small hole through which tlies are introduced. With this evaluation we pretend to identífY the gene segregation in the offspring and select the resistant and susceptible materials.We are using Simple Sequences Repeat SSR to find markers associated to resistance for mapping and ultirnately cloning the resistant genes. The SSR are random repeat sequences across all eukaryotic genome. These simple repeats can range from two to six base pairs (bp). SSRs show high polymorphism, are locus specific and multiallelic, they have a mendelian inheritance and also are codominant. We are using silver staining to visualize the allelic segregation of the markers.Genomic DNA of282 individuals offspring was isolatcd from (resh, young tissue of cassava leaves powdered with liquid nitrogen, according to Dellaporta et al. (1983) method modified (Figure 6). Both parents Ecu-72 and MCol2246 were evaluated with 343 cassava SSRs including 157 cDNA SSRs recently developed (Mba et al, submitted). Approximate 60% ofthe SSRs were polymorphic. (Figure 7, Table 8). "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0659401373.json b/main/part_2/0659401373.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0d7c0e860f2b67360786518163af58a88ba16b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0659401373.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7304a18116c1acf231f007dbb7e20e8f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/46dfa39f-2c6c-4fd4-af05-d0f427611aed/content","id":"1105537159"},"keywords":["4R","agriculture","balance","emissions","management","N 2 O","rice","subtropical","yield"],"sieverID":"8e80165c-6c5f-40c7-965d-05ba5f74df4d","content":"Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient in crop production that supports current and future human population. With the advent of the \"Green Revolution\" in the 1960s, crop yields-especially for cerealsincreased substantially to support rising global food demand. This increased production was made possible through the introduction of high yielding crop varieties, accompanied by the availability anduse of inorganic fertilizer, irrigation, and advanced mechanization (Zhang et al., 2015). For example, the world's population increased from 3 to 7.5 billion during 1960-2016, and fertilizer N consumption during this period increased by almost 10-fold to an annual average of approximately 110 Tg N year −1 (Battye et al., 2017;Benbi, 2017).By 2008, inorganic N fertilizers fed up to 50% of the world's population (Erisman et al., 2008). Although N fertilizers have immensely contributed to human dietary needs, large areas of global cropland still lack sufficient available N for food and nutrition security (Ciceri & Allanore, 2019). Furthermore, with limited land available for agricultural expansion, more than 90% of future production growth is expected to come from higher yields and increased cropping intensity (FAO, 2009). With population pressure and increasing demand for animal-based protein, future demand for N is expected to grow substantially to ensure sufficient food for more than 9.7 billion people by the middle of the 21st century (FAO, 2017).This large addition of reactive N to the global ecosystem comes, however, with unintended environmental consequences since only about half of the global N fertilizer inputs are recovered in harvested yield (Lassaletta et al., 2014;Martinez-Feria et al., 2018). The other half of the fertilizer N applied to crops remains in the environment, where it can contribute to climate change and water quality issues along with other environmental and human health externalities (Lassaletta et al., 2016). Surplus N may be lost from the soil-plant system by denitrification in the form of dinitrogen (N 2 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and nitric oxide (NO), by ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization, or via nitrate (NO −3 ) leaching and runoff (Bouwman et al., 2013). Of these, N 2 O emissions are of particular concern as it is an important greenhouse gas with global warming potential 265-298 times higher than that of CO 2 in a 100 year-time horizon, and it also influences stratospheric chemistry, depleting the ozone layer (IPCC, 2013;Yue et al., 2018). Agriculture is responsible for approximately 78% of global anthropogenic N 2 O emissions (Mbow et al., 2017), corresponding to 5%-6% of global greenhouse emissions (Smith et al., 2007).Projections of growing population and food demand, particularly in regions with current N shortages that will require greater N supply, suggest that without significant changes in the agriculture and the food system, agricultural emissions of N 2 O will continue to increase (FAO, 2017). A world kept within livable limits thus depends on scientists, farmers, and their partners to solve this challenge.Numerous studies have shown that N 2 O emissions from agricultural soils increase with the application of N (Bouwman et al., 2002;Halvorson et al., 2011;Hoben et al., 2011). Excessive N fertilization reduces nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), as defined by N removed per unit of N applied, where the increase in surplus N is one of the most important causal factors for increased N losses (Billen et al., 2013;Bouwman et al., 2013). Fertilizer management practices such as the \"right\" source, timing, and placement (referred to collectively with the \"right\" rate as the \"4Rs\") play a varied role in improving NUE-and reducing fertilizer-induced N 2 O emissions (Fixen, 2020).Meta-analyses of multiple field studies find that optimizing fertilizer N rate, source, and timing can reduce N 2 O emissions in maize (Zea mays) systems by up to 50% (Eagle et al., 2017). However, weather, soil, and other factors affect complex N cycling dynamics-which limit the evidence for consistent functional relationships among management practices, NUE, and N 2 O. For this reason, incentive programs and protocols for N 2 O emission reductions have generally focused on rate adjustments alone (Casellas et al., 2009;Eve et al., 2014;Millar et al., 2010;Niles et al., 2019). Prescriptive fertilizer rate reductions may not, however, maintain or improve productivity for field crops of high yield potential; acknowledge individual field and farm differences in climate, soil, equipment, and other resources; or encourage creative nutrient management problem-solving by producers and their advisors.Assuming steady-state conditions in soil organic matter, a partial N balance (PNB) has been proposed as a robust proxy for the amount of N at risk of loss to the environment (McLellan et al., 2018). This PNB can be calculated from the same components as NUE (i.e., N outputs and N inputs), using basic yield and fertilizer data well known to producers. Reductions in excessive N balances can be achieved by rate adjustments or yield improvements that depend on good nutrient management. For example, Omonode et al. (2017) reported that optimal rate and timing of N fertilizer applications reduced N 2 O emissions most consistently under management that led to lower N balances through an increase in plant N uptake and grain N removal in North American maize-based systems.Therefore, gains in plant N uptake or recovery efficiency will reduce the N balance, increase NUE, and contribute to reduced N 2 O emission during crop production (Omonode et al., 2017). On the other hand, the global increase in N inputs in crop production has been mostly coupled with a decrease in NUE, and a growing population and food demand in Asian and African regions with historically low input use and crop yields provide impetus to ensuring that future production gains simultaneously minimize negative environmental impacts (Zhang et al., 2015). While individual studies have observed improved yield, N recovery efficiency, and NUE with optimized N placement and timing in subtropical wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rice (Oryza sativa) cropping systems (Bijay-Singh et al., 2015;Singh et al., 2014;Yadvinder-Singh et al., 2015), evidence for optimal 4R management is particularly scanty and scattered for tropical and subtropical agroecosystems of Asia and Africa. Therefore, research efforts are needed to synthesize data on N management, metrics, and environmental outcomes to inform intervention for the cropping systems of these regions.Our research objectives were to (i) relate changes in fertilizer management practices to yield and plant N uptake and (ii) then link these outcomes to N 2 O emissions from cereal and vegetable crop systems. Using up-to-date peer-reviewed research evidence for Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, we examined the relationships among N management strategies, crop yields, and N 2 O emissions. We used a multilevel regression approach to model yield and N 2 O observations coming from different cropping systems, soil regimes, 4R management, and climates (Eagle et al., 2017). From these functional relationships, we calculated increases in yields as well as reductions in seasonal N 2 O emissions due to adjustments in fertilizer management and/or enhanced NUE. The results establish that performanceindicators such as PNB and partial factor productivity (PFP) are robust, integrative, and relevant to management of N 2 O emission in programs of crop yield improvements in under-represented regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia.We based our analysis on two databases. The first was a publicly available N 2 O database (https://sampl es.ccafs.cgiar.org/n2odashb oard/) that underpins other previous analyses (Albanito et al., 2017;Yue et al., 2018). This first dataset is primarily focused on N 2 O emissions and has a global geographic extent, but it is limited in (i) yield and plant or grain N data and (ii) its representation in tropical and subtropical Asia and Africa. To fill these research gaps concurrently, we conducted a systematic review for this region prioritizing fertilizer management, yield, and N uptake data with and without measured N 2 O emissions. We then utilized the global dataset as a reference to assess the generalizability of our interpretations of climate, edaphic, and management impacts on N 2 O emissions which was important considering not all N management studies measure emissions (e.g., the degree to which the results of our study can be applied to a broader sample assembled independently).Following the approach outlined by previous meta-analyses (Eagle et al., 2017;2020), we conducted advanced literature searches in the Web of Science database to identify soil science and agricultural articles related to N fertilization (using search terms for \"agricult*,\" \"nitrogen,\" and \"fertili*). Specifically, we aimed to identify articles summarizing the findings from studies conducted in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa published from 2000 until August 2019.In this broad search, we retrieved 2895 publications. We then refined our search function to narrow down the list of papers using three approaches. In the first approach, we filtered sub-searches for studies with \"nitrous oxide\" and \"yield\" topics from papers published from an exhaustive list of countries falling within Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Second, not restricting studies to those reporting N 2 O emissions, we refined the search results to fertilizer management factors, including the \"rate,\" \"time,\" \"place,\" \"source,\" \"form,\" \"4R,\" \"split application,\" \"basal,\" \"timing,\" \"top-dress,\" \"sidedress,\" \"subsurface,\" \"surface,\" \"broadcast,\" \"injected,\" \"fertilizer pattern,\" \"incorporation,\" \"fertilizer schedule,\" \"fall application,\" \"spring application\", and \"NUE.\" In our final approach, we refined the search to \"N 2 O\" and agronomic terms but did not restrict the search results to the exhaustive list of countries, and instead inspected the abstracts individually. In total, we imported 757 unique papers into an EndNote (Clarivate, Philadelphia, PA) library, from which we assessed the titles and abstracts. We discarded 394 papers that (i) did not contain original research (e.g., literature review);(ii) were not field-based (e.g., greenhouse experiments, model simulations); (iii) did not pertain to N fertilizer management (e.g., no comparisons of rate, source, timing, or placement of fertilizer); or (iv) were not conducted in Asia or Africa. We then further examined the experimental design and the data for the remaining 363 papers. We compiled data from 160 studies that met the following criteria: (i) reported seasonal crop yield, crop N uptake, or cumulative direct N 2 O-N emissions; (ii) included at least one comparison across treatments; (iii) reported application rates of inorganic and/ or organic N; (iv) did not average across years unless the statistics indicated a lack of treatment and time interaction; and (v) did not sum multiple crops. Nitrogen input from biological N fixation was omitted due to being beyond the scope of the study. Additionally, N deposition was excluded as an input due to its lack of data reporting. Finally, we manually transcribed the data from tables or digitally retrieved values from graphs using the WebPlotDigitizer 4.0.0 software (Rohangi, 2020).In total, we gathered 2661 data points/observations from 160 publications. We refer to this data from Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa as the \"Asia-Africa\" dataset (Table S1). The Asia-Africa dataset has 133 unique locations (Figure 1), where a single location may serve as the site for more than one publication as indicated by the reported location or latitudinal and longitudinal coordinates. Certain publications also reported these data from more than one geographic location. In total, our final Asia-Africa dataset contained 181 unique publicationlocation combinations, and 224 unique publication-location-crop \"clusters\". Of these, the majority (67.4%) of the clusters were located in China. The rest were located in South Asia (22.3%), Sub-Saharan Africa (6.3%), Southeast Asia (2.7%), and remainder in Japan, Iran, or Syria (1.3%). The majority of the clusters were located in the subtropics (54%), followed by those in the tropics (13%) and temperate regions (32% China (<24% of the clusters). It is also important to note that only one of the 31 studies reporting all three variables (i.e., N 2 O, dry matter yield, and N uptake) was conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa, representing a large regional data gap.We recorded additional metadata (when available) pertaining to crop, edaphic, climatic, management, and methodological factors.The crop factors included crop type, previous crop, residue management, and rotation. Edaphic factors (typically sampled within a 30 cm depth) included soil texture, soil pH, soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration, and total soil N concentration. Climatic factors included mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP), seasonal experimental mean temperature, and seasonal experimental precipitation. Management factors included irrigation, tillage practices, and fertilizer management. For fertilizer management, we transcribed the N source (e.g., inorganic and/or organic; microbial inhibitors), timing (e.g., number and timing of applications), and placement (e.g., method of application). Urea was the primary source of synthetic fertilizer for more than 86% of observations, and so inorganic fertilizer categories were not disaggregated further.We also recorded the application rates of N fertilizer from synthetic sources as well as N rates associated with organic sources. Finally, we also noted methodological factors, such as replication, plot size, as well as N 2 O measurement method, duration, frequency, placement, and area.We only included studies in the database in which researchers explicitly defined and observed all data with the following exceptions: First, we estimated missing longitudinal and latitudinal coordinates based on location descriptions. Second, we extracted long-term MAP and MAT and other bioclim data for specific location coordinates from the WorldClim database (Fick & Hijmans, 2017) using the Raster and sp packages in R (R Core Team, 2020). Third, we converted soil organic matter concentrations to SOC by dividing the former by the conversion factor of 1.72 (Van Bemmelen, 1890) and added 0.75 to adjust pH values measured in CaCl 2 instead of water (Sanchez, 2019;Weil & Brady, 2017). Finally, we assumed yields were reported on a dry matter basis if the moisture content was not specified.After filling in missing data, we grouped the observational-level data into categories of crop, edaphic, climatic, management, and methodological factors (Supporting Information 1 part A, S1-A).After categorization, we undertook data cleaning steps. First, we categorized one banana (Musa acuminata) study with \"other row crops\" because it did not fall within cereal or vegetable categories.We also removed two studies that reported the average of maize and wheat yields. In addition, we removed four unusual outliers with negative cumulative N 2 O emissions reported in a single study, considering that negative emissions were extremely rare in the dataset and likely attributable to instrumental noise rather than microbial processes (Cowan et al., 2014). Finally, we removed one study after geographic coordinates revealed that the study was conducted in Australia, which was outside our regional scope.One limitation to the generalizability of the Asia-Africa database compiled from peer-reviewed literature is a bias toward cropping systems in China and the subtropics. To overcome such a limitation, we accessed a publicly available global N 2 O database (https://sampl es.ccafs.cgiar.org/n2o-dashb oard/) to compare and contrast our model results, which draws from multiple sources and may help to reduce this bias. We call this data the \"Global N 2 O\" dataset (Table S2).We did not perform the systematic review of the literature nor data entry, and search criteria and filtering protocol are found elsewhere (Albanito et al., 2017;Yue et al., 2018). First, we filtered this dataset to select only row-crops, cereals (including rice), and vegetable crops grown in mineral soils with additions of fertilizer not exceeding 1200 kg N ha −1 year −1 . Next, we performed the same data categorization and cleaning steps as previously discussed for Asia-Africa dataset. In total, the Global N 2 O dataset contained 2247 annual (rather than seasonal) N 2 O observations from 259 studies ( 296unique publication-crop-location clusters). More than half of the clusters (55%) were located within Asia and Africa, predominantly in China (42% vs. 13% from Africa and other Asian countries). The rest were located in Europe (22%), North America (18%), South America (2.7%), and remainder in Australia (2%). The majority of the study sites were located in temperate regions (58%), followed by those in the subtropics (32%) and tropics (8%). Papers reported yield for less than 37% of clusters, and plant N uptake in even fewer clusters (7%). Experimental years, if reported, ranged from 1974 to 2015, and more than half of the observations were collected between 2007 and 2015. The Global N 2 O dataset included 37 studies in the Asia-Africa dataset (Table S2), which resulted in an overlap for 39% of the clusters reporting N 2 O emissions in the Asia-Africa dataset and an overlap for 23% of the clusters in the Global N 2 O dataset. Notably, our systematic review did not capture two suitable studies (both conducted in China) resulting in a 95% recovery rate.We utilized a multilevel regression modeling approach to assess the impact of crop, edaphic, and management variables on the observed biological responses (e.g., N 2 O emissions, plant N uptake, or yield). Multilevel regressions are mixed-effect models, which enable researchers to examine observations derived from different cropping systems, soil regimes, management, and climates (Eagle et al., 2017;Qian et al., 2010). At the observational level (i.e., level 1), the model can analyze the biological response to multiple continuous and/or categorical independent variables (i.e., predictors). Multilevel models also allow for random effects, permitting practitioners to cluster observations (i.e., level 2) for a given study that would otherwise violate the assumption of independence (Qian, 2017). Simply, we used a multilevel regression to allow for varying y-intercepts among clusters, and then to quantify the coefficients for each predictor assuming a constant slope among clusters based on similar response functions at individual sites (Supporting Information 1-B). Multilevel models can also handle unbalanced data (e.g., varying observations among clusters) by adjusting the the weight of clusters to account for variance or sample size.A multilevel model can also include predictors at the observational level (level 1) and cluster level (level 2). The crop, soil, and climatic data generally vary among rather than within sites and studies (i.e., clusters, level 2). This distinction is important for management factors, which can vary both within and among studies.Therefore, we undertook additional categorization steps to distinguish between fertilizer management factors within a cluster (level 1, i.e., \"treatments\" or \"within subject\") and among clusters (level 2, i.e., \"fixed experimental elements\" or \"between subject\") to properly interpret the model coefficients. In all of the analyses, we confirmed with the intraclass correlation statistic that multilevel modeling is a valid and appropriate approach (Supporting Information 2-1).We designed our statistical procedure to address three main objectives, detailed in an analytical flowchart (Supporting Information 1-C). Our first objective was to identify important climate, soil, and management factors to predict N 2 O. We performed all analyses on natural-log transformed N 2 O data to satisfy the assumptions of a linear regression, which was evidenced by the large difference between the mean and median values. We did not mean center predictors given that we were not interpreting y-intercepts in our analysis. We performed a backwards selection procedure using the step function in the lmerTest package (R Core Team, 2020) to identify significant level 1 or level 2 predictors for N 2 O emissions, yield, and plant N uptake. Predictors included crop type, latitude, MAT, MAP, irrigation, tillage, soil texture, clay percentage, soil pH, SOC content, measurement period (i.e., timeframe over which measurements were collected), and frequency of N 2 O measurements. We selected MAP as the predictor for precipitation because our preliminary indicated the other bioclim variables such as precipitation in the driest month, wettest month, coefficient of variation, wettest quarter, driest quarter, warmest quarter, and coldest quarter did not provide additional clarity to the model (Supporting Information 2-1). We visually inspected each significant predictor in the final model always controlling for N rate (Supporting Information 2-1).When we evaluated the model, we observed non-normal residuals and heteroscedasticity that violate the assumptions of a regression analysis. Therefore, we present data modeled with the rlmer function in the robustlmm package in R (R Core Team, 2020). This function is similar to the lmer function (lme4 package), but provides less biased estimates for skewed variables in order to overcome observed issues in our response variables such as long-tailedness (Tanadini & Mehrabi, 2017). For robustness testing, we compared the rlmer modeling results with an lme (nlme package) function that allows for unequal variance across clusters to account for potential issues related to heteroscedasticity, but we settled on the rlmer approach because of the long-tailedness of the residuals. We reran the final backwards-selected model (Supporting Information 2-1) to confirm that all selected predictors were significant in the robust model (i.e., rlmer).Once we developed our base model, our second objective was to assess the response of seasonal N 2 O emissions (kg N ha −1 season −1 ) to inorganic and/or organic N application rate (kg N ha −1 season −1 ), PNB (kg N ha −1 season −1 ), or PFP of N (kg yield kg N −1 season −1 ). PNB can be expressed as a difference (Eagle et al., 2020) or index (Fixen et al., 2015) of crop N output from or to fertilizer inputs, which may or may not include straw N (EU Nitrogen Expert Panel, 2015; Omonode et al., 2017). In this study, we defined PNB as Equation(1), which has been used to estimate N surplus (van Groenigen et al., 2010) and factors in plant N uptake at harvest (as either reported by authors or calculated from stated above-ground biomass and N concentration). We defined PFP by Equation (2) (Fixen et al., 2015).We compared the models by assessing marginal pseudo-R 2 (mR 2 ), or variance explained by fixed effects; and conditional pseudo-R 2 (cR 2 ), or the variance explained by both the fixed and random effects (Nakagawa & Schielzeth, 2013). Because the robust model does not correspond to likelihood, criteria to compare models such as Akaike information criterion are unavailable (Supporting Information 2-2).We further tested the effect of fertilizer management factors on N 2 O emission and crop productivity (Supporting Information 2-3).Due to the diversity of experimental designs, and therefore missing data, we assessed fertilizer management factors individually on data subsets. Specifically, we tested the effects of fertilizer additives (i.e., enhanced efficiency fertilizer or EEF), the addition of organic fertilizers (i.e., animal manure or compost) with or without synthetic fertilizers, fertilizer placement (broadcasted or incorporated), and fertilization frequency (number of applications) on natural log transformed N 2 O emissions, crop yield, and plant N uptake. We then utilized the robust linear mixed model (rlmer) to assess the interactive effect of crop yield, N rate, and crop type on the natural log transformed N 2 O emissions. Finally, we regressed the predicted yield against the predicted N 2 O emissions controlling for N rate. However, we interpreted this last relationship as conceptual given missing N 2 O data in some studies.For ease of interpretation, N 2 O emissions and modeled parameters were back-transformed for the Figures (Supporting Information of 46% or less (Figure 2). In contrast, experimental clusters (i.e., our random effect) explained 43%-58% of the variance due to unquantified or random differences between studies and sites, resulting in cR 2 ranging from 88% to 95%. Of the 11 site-level predictors, only crop system type (i.e., paddy rice) and SOC were consistently significant in increasing N 2 O emissions while controlling for N rate, in the Asia-Africa dataset (Figure 2a) and the Global N 2 O dataset (Figure 2b). In the Asia-Africa dataset, rice systems had 71% lower N 2 O emissions than maize systems while emissions increased by almost 5% per unit increase in SOC (%) for a given N rate. Comparatively, rice systems had 57% lower emissions than other cereals in the Global N 2 O dataset while emissions increased by 19% per unit increase in SOC (%).Each dataset also had factors that were significant but not generalizable. MAT and MAP were significant in the Asia-Africa dataset but were positively and negatively correlated with emissions, respectively (Figure 2a). In contrast, absolute latitude and study duration (e.g., N 2 O measurement period) were significant predictors for the Global N 2 O emissions that were also positively and negatively correlated with emissions, respectively (Figure 2b).Fertilizer N rate was a significant predictor of N 2 O emissions, which had similar impacts on N 2 O emissions in both the Asia-Africa and Global N 2 O datasets (Figure 2a,b). Our analysis estimated that N 2 O emissions increased by approximately 0.4% for each additional 1 kg of N ha −1 . Our comparisons between N rate versus PNB (Figure 2c,d) and N rate versus PFP metrics (Figure 2e,f) in the Asia-Africa dataset indicated that these metrics were also significant factors and performed as well or better as N rate at predicting N 2 O emissions.Specifically, N 2 O emissions increased with increasing PNB but decreasing PFP. More N 2 O variance was explained by models that included PNB (mR 2 = 46%) or PFP (mR 2 = 42%) as fixed factors rather than N rate (mR 2 = 44% and 37%, respectively). However, this advantage did not persist when including random effects (cR 2 ). Of particular interest, the predicted regression models for PNB and N 2 O emissions were more similar among vegetables, maize, and wheat crops (Figure 3b) than estimates based on N rate (Figure 3a), which Predictors such as fertilizer management significantly impacted N 2 O emissions when controlling for N rate and other significant factors.We examined fertilizer management on the observational-level(level 1, i.e., management varied within clusters) and site-level factors (level 2, i.e., management varied between clusters). Fertilizer management was only consistently significant on the observational level (Supporting Information 2-3), and so we present data for our level 1 analysis. EEFs decreased N 2 O emissions by 24% for a given N rate in the Asia-Africa (Figure 4a) across maize, rice, vegetable, and wheat season (Figure 4b). These results were also observed in theGlobal N 2 O dataset (Figure 4c) for annual cropping of rice, other cereals, row crops, and vegetables (Figure 4d). The addition of organic or integration of organic/mineral fertilizers (largely through the application of manure) resulted in a significant 7.5% increase in N 2 O emissions in the Asia-Africa dataset (Figure 5a) compared to mineral fertilizers alone, but this effect was small in magnitude (Figure 5b) with no differences detected in Global N 2 O emissions (Figure 5c) across the various cropping systems (Figure 5d). Non-surface placement did not have a significant effect in the Asia-Africa dataset but increased N 2 O emissions in the Global N 2 O dataset (data not shown, Supporting Information 2-5).Nitrous oxide emissions increased with increasing number of fertilizer applications in the Asia-Africa dataset (Figure 6a). Upon with EEFs or organic amendments; Figure 6b). Fertilization frequency had little to no effect on emissions when the same type of fertilizer was added more frequently in both datasets (Figure 6c). Thus, only when the frequency of applications and type of fertilizer were confounded, N 2 O emissions significantly increased with more frequent applications of largely untreated N fertilizers or synthetic fertilizers alone (Figure 6d). We observed the same patterns in the global dataset (Figure 7a-d). These findings are particularly salient in our efforts to isolate the impact of 4R management and highlight the need for meta-analyses to specify whether (i) management comparisons co-varied rate, timing, source, and/or placement; and (ii) 4R management differed within studies or among studies when assessing impact of management on N 2 O emissions (i.e., observational level or site level).Due to data limitations in the Global N 2 O dataset, our productivity analysis was restricted to the Asia-Africa dataset. Based on the nonlinear relationship between N rate and productivity (Supporting Information 2-4), we selected a quadratic function to fit the data.We found that crop yields and plant N uptake increased with EEFs, N rate, and more frequent fertilization (Figure 8) as well as nonsurface placement (data not shown) until reaching a maximum prior to a potential decline. Thus, our analysis highlights potential synergies and trade-offs between N 2 O emissions and crop productivity. We observed co-benefits for the use of EEFs, where N 2 O emissions decreased (Figure 4) while increasing yields (Figure 8a)and N uptake (Figure 8c), thereby reducing PNB. In contrast, we observed little co-benefits-or even potential trade-offs-for the number of applications (Figure 8b,d). Specifically, more frequent applications of fertilizer had a very small but significantly positive effect on yields and plant N uptake, which did not correspond with reductions in N 2 O emissions (Figures 6 and 7). Furthermore, non-surface placement of fertilizer also increased yields and plant N uptake (Supporting Information 2-4) despite having inconsistent and largely insignificant effect on N 2 O emissions (Supporting Information 2-3). These findings highlight the challenges to teasing out overarching impacts of narrowly focused fertilizer management decisions (i.e., focus only on a single \"R\") and may even expose potential trade-offs related to pollution swapping if reductions in N 2 O emissions are not coupled with an increase in N uptake by plants through a holistic, adaptive 4R management approach that target multiple loss pathways. We observed a significant interaction between N rate and productivity on N 2 O emissions in the Asia-Africa dataset (Supporting Information 2-4). In the model that allowed for the interaction between crop and N rate, higher yields were associated with a lesser N 2 O losses for a given rate of fertilizer, as N 2 O emissions increased with N rate (Figure 9, n = 967, 96 clusters). This is particularly apparent at higher N rates (>200 kg N ha −1 season −1 ), which for lower yielding cereal crops likely represent excessive fertilization. The tension between N management and productivity on N 2 O emissions is conceptually illustrated in Figure 10, where we regress predicted yields and predicted emissions using the model coefficients from the N 2 O (Figure 4) and yield (Figure 8) models based on significant predictors (allowing for missing N 2 O emission data). The predicted N 2 O emissions increased exponentially as yields approach their maxima. With regard to N rate, this relationship implies that emissions increased as yield gains declined with each incremental increase in N input due to growing inefficiencies of N use. However, in this range, EEFs appear to \"shift\" the curve to achieve greater yields and lower emissions than crops fertilized with non-EEFs (Figure 10 (Albanito et al., 2017;Cayuela et al., 2017;Eagle et al., 2020;van Lent et al., 2015;Liu et al., 2017;Rochette et al., 2018;Sapkota et al., 2020;Stehfest & Bouwman, 2006). Other than N rate, some of these previous studies identified that fertilizer source also influences N 2 O emissions. In our analysis, N rate (and its derivatives), crop type, and SOC were the only generalizable factors to consistently explain the variance in N 2 O emissions. These findings were expected (Eagle et al., 2020).For instance, NH 3 (and methane) emissions are a greater concern in flooded systems given that urea or manure (or another ammoniumbased nutrient source) is the preferred for plant uptake (Wang et al., 1993) in environments with slow rates of nitrification and higher risk of denitrification losses in anaerobic zones.Although additional factors were important in other studies (Eagle et al., 2020;Liu et al., 2017;Stehfast & Bouwman, 2006), the effects of other factors were at times not significant, not generalizable, or even unexpected according to theory. Furthermore, we also found no clear agreement on other minimal parameters needed to explain the majority of variance in N 2 O emissions. Instead, we attributed the majority of the variation in emissions to undetermined randomness associated with experimental-location differences. This lack of consistency among predictors is common in the literature, highlighting the difficulties to adequately account for variability of N 2 O emissions across contrasting locations and systems in our models (Albanito et al., 2017).Given that climate and soil factors impact N 2 O emissions, such discrepancies expose the limitations of global and intercontinental datasets based on hundreds of studies to develop localized estimates. First, it is possible that the quality of the predictor data, as well as differences across studies, may impact the variance explained by these predictors. For instance, we used MAP in the analysis to fill missing data and standardize across sites. However, predictors that incorporate seasonal precipitation Many countries within tropical and subtropical regions rely on the IPCC Tier I protocol for N 2 O inventory which assumes that N 2 O emissions increase by 0.01 kg N 2 O-N per kg of N fertilizer applied.While this is the dominant paradigm, our findings demonstrate that a PNB indicator performs as well or better than N rate when predicting N 2 O emissions in a wide assemblage of agroecosystems. Importantly, the N balance approach incorporates productivity, and our analysis provides new evidence that increasing N uptake is associated with reducing N 2 O emissions for a given N rate. This is likely because greater plant N recovery decreases the amounts of inorganic N available to nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria. The N balance approach may act as an integrating metric to evaluate suites of adaptive 4R practices that work together to tighten the N cycle in a cropping system-certainly including but not exclusive to N rate adjustments. We recommend the broader use of this metric beyond North America and in other production systems of other regions.However, we acknowledge one caveat to this approach is the availability of the information with which farmers have to calculate their application rates, yields, and N concentration. Despite PNB being the predictor of N 2 O emissions, only 31 of the 100 N 2 O studies provided enough data to calculate PNB based on N uptake (and even less for harvested N). In the absence of plant or grain N data, PFP may be a more widely measurable indicator. Second, while a relatively lower PNB or higher PFP is indicative of better agronomic performance, a negative N balance is undesirable to prevent soil nutrient mining.Thus, PNB and PFP must be interpreted within the context of inputs and yield.An alternative approach may be to assign N 2 O emission reduction coefficients to specific 4R nutrient management practices. Aside from N rate, fertilizer source is often considered an important predictor of N 2 O emissions (Albanito et al., 2017). However, a clear understanding of other fertilizer management considerations, such as where nitrification inhibitors alone or combined with urease inhibitors reduced N 2 O emissions by 8%-100% (Eagle et al., 2017;Lam et al., 2017;Li et al., 2018;Qiao et al., 2015;Snyder et al., 2009;Thapa et al., 2016;Xia et al., 2017). Unlike other predictors, EEFs F I G U R E 9 Examining the impact of improved agronomic performance (e.g., higher yields) on N 2 O emissions for a given level of N application (n = 967, 96 clusters). Lines represent predicted values from fixed effects in multilevel regression models (ignoring random effects) for the Asia-Africa dataset, and shaded area represents 95% confidence bands not be always effective at reducing N 2 O emissions (Akiyama et al., 2010;Li et al., 2018;Thapa et al., 2016).With regard to organic fertilizer inputs, we found that the in- , 2019). Another meta-analysis determined that substituting manure for synthetic fertilizer had no impact on N 2 O emissions (Xia et al., 2017), while a third study measured no impact of manure on emissions at the same N balance (defined as N fertilizer minus grain N offtake) when controlling for SOC (Eagle et al., 2020). Therefore, our analysis adds more complexity to the literature, and questions the generalizability of specific emission factors based on organic versus synthetic sources.The impacts of fertilizer timing and placement on N 2 O emissions remain inconclusive in our analysis, and thus we cannot recommend universally prescriptive timing and placement for N 2 O emission reduction. This finding underscores that 4R management is an adaptive management framework that considers the site-specific efficacy of the selected practices for a range of relevant sustainability outcomes, and thus should not be reduced to specific timing and placement options (Fixen, 2020). While we found that increasing the number of fertilizer applications (controlling for N rate) did not necessarily reduce N 2 O emissions despite small but significant improvements in yield, we also identified a major caveat in 4R meta-analyses.Many of the experiments in both datasets were not designed to isolate the impacts of timing, and treatment designs often confounded source and timing. For instance, researchers often apply polymer coated urea once versus a split application of urea. We found that In their meta-analysis, Fernandez et al. (2020) 2017) found that emissions were higher with later side-dress applications. Thus, rather than focus on specific fertilizer management strategies, we can instead select from a suite of practices that reduce high N balances (Omonode et al., 2017).Our results highlight the need to consider potential trade-offs among N loss pathways. In our analysis, subsurface placement of fertilizer did not mitigate N 2 O emissions in agreement with observations in North American maize-based systems (Eagle et al., 2017).This finding may be surprising because subsurface application increased yields and is generally considered a best management practice (Nkebiwe et al., 2016) may also be driving these observed relationships (Drury et al., 2017), especially considering that a previous meta-analysis reported that deep placement of fertilizer reduced NH 3 volatilization (Huang et al., 2016). This pathway may be particularly important in the Asia-Africa dataset given that urea was the primary fertilizer source.Furthermore, trade-offs between these two loss pathways have also been observed with the use of nitrification inhibitors despite consistent yield improvements (Li et al., 2018;Pan et al., 2016;Qiao et al., 2015). Presumably, a reduction of NH 3 volatilization could lead to greater N 2 O emissions (or other downstream losses if the inorganic N is not immobilized by microbes or plants), particularly if rates are not adjusted in response to increased N use efficiencies.A novel aspect of our study is that we explored the relationships between N 2 O emissions and yield with increasing N rate, which is largely lacking in the literature. Our findings support the development of locally adapted suites of 4R practices that reduce PNB (and reduce losses). We found that (i) N rate reduction and (ii) the use of EEFs are both critical 4R strategies to optimize PNB. This is because any N applied in excess of crop removal is at risk of loss, with et al., 2018). Therefore, understanding the management differences could help growers identify changes that may improve productivity and fine-tune N rates on a field or sub-field scale while also reducing N balances. In other words, we should aim for reducing N balance either by reducing N rate with the same yield level or by increasing the yield with the same N rate.In regions with low N use, negative N balances, and high yield gaps due to imbalanced fertilization, we recommend holistic strategies that improve yields but prevent high N balances (and N 2 O losses) with system improvements that must include increasing N inputs. The avoidance of excess N is critical given that increasing fertilizer N rates from 50 to 150 kg ha −1 season −1 is projected to increase N 2 O emissions in the tropics by 30% (Huddell et al., 2020) and by as much as 55% in our regional assessment of Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Ultimately, in the N-limited scenario, optimization of N rate relative to yield and fertilizer management is critical. Conceptually, N 2 O emissions increase exponentially once some productivity threshold is attained (Figure 11). This finding is in accordance with the law of diminishing returns, where N 2 O emissions increased as yield gains declined with each incremental increase in N inputs. In this conceptual model, the application of EEFs increased yields (and N uptake, data not shown) but decreased N 2 O emissions. In lower yielding systems, EEFs resulted in lower N 2 O emissions for a given level of productivity. As productivity increased, yield gains continued under lower N 2 O emissions for crops fertilized with EEFs, thus \"shifting\" the exponential increase in N 2 O emissions to higher yield levels. Further yield gains through crop selection and irrigation can continue to \"shift\" and improve NUE in higher yielding systems via concomitant increases in both yields and NUE (Zhang et al., 2015).Therefore, we conclude that fertilizer management strategies that increase NUE, and thus optimize N balance, will be particularly critical to abate or even avoid the exponential increases in N 2 O emissions as yields approach optimization with adequate N supply. This where more rapid plant growth may partially reduce excessive levels of inorganic N in soil available for microbial transformation to N 2 O in higher-producing systems. Therefore, we recommend adopting an N balance approach toward selecting a combination of fertilizer management practice and technology packages (e.g., breeding, fertilizer, irrigation, etc.) to increase food production while minimizing pollution (Pingali, 2012) such as N 2 O emissions. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0663200945.json b/main/part_2/0663200945.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc1ba7b3dc0245d32d0cc1bca0fe08243a182c5a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0663200945.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ec7f152d630a21848dc355de88c3e637","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9e590e33-3b48-4477-bbe4-ca4c710d5ce6/retrieve","id":"-1486175294"},"keywords":["breeding","carotenoids","genetic gain","genomic prediction","Manihot esculenta","vitamin A deficiency"],"sieverID":"38f8e65e-85fb-4d6d-b9a8-95f6f313781f","content":"Global efforts are underway to develop cassava with enhanced levels of provitamin A carotenoids to sustainably meet increasing demands for food and nutrition where the crop is a major staple. Herein, we tested the effectiveness of genomic selection (GS) for rapid improvement of cassava for total carotenoids content and associated traits. We evaluated 632 clones from Uganda's provitamin A cassava breeding pipeline and 648 West African introductions. At harvest, each clone was assessed for level of total carotenoids, dry matter content, and resistance to cassava brown streak disease (CBSD). All clones were genotyped with diversity array technology and imputed to a set of 23,431 single nucleotide polymorphic markers. We assessed predictive ability of four genomic prediction methods in scenarios of cross-validation, across population prediction, and inclusion of quantitative trait loci markers. Cross-validations produced the highest mean prediction ability for total carotenoids content (0.52) and the lowest for CBSD resistance (0.20), with G-BLUP outperforming other models tested. Across population, predictions showed low ability of Ugandan population to predict the performance of West African clones, with the highest predictive ability recorded for total carotenoids content (0.34) and the lowest for CBSD resistance (0.12) using G-BLUP. By incorporating chromosome 1 markers associated with carotenoids content as independent kernel in the G-BLUP model of a cross-validation scenario, prediction ability slightly improved from 0.52 to 0.58. These results reinforce ongoing efforts aimed at integrating GS into cassava breeding and demonstrate the utility of this tool for rapid genetic improvement.Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), grown on approximately 18 million hectares in Africa, offers great potential to end extreme hunger, achieve food security and improve nutrition, if proven varieties are unconditionally accessed by producers and consumers (Kolawole et al. 2010). However, nutritionally cassava is deficient in essential micronutrients such as provitamin A carotenoids (Montagnac et al. 2009), which renders diets that heavily depend on the crop vulnerable to vitamin A deficiency (VAD). Indeed, VAD is a widespread nutritional challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, with women and children being the most affected (Gegios et al. 2010;Stephenson et al. 2010). For this reason, cassava varieties with elevated levels of provitamin A carotenoids are being developed and promoted (Pfeiffer and McClafferty 2007) as a cost-effective and sustainable approach to help communities burdened by VAD (Bouis et al. 2011;Talsma et al. 2013). The significant variation for total carotenoid content (TCC) (ranging from 1.02 to 10.4 mg g À1 ), of which >90% is constituted by ß-carotene, a provitamin A carotenoid, reported in large collection (>2400 clones) of cassava accessions (Cha ´vez et al. 2005;Nassar et al. 2007) could facilitate the effective breeding of nutrition-sensitive varieties.A major drawback in our endeavors to breed cassava varieties with elevated provitamin A carotenoids has been the undesirable tendency of low dry matter content (DMC) in most provitamin A cassava clones (Njoku et al. 2015;Esuma et al. 2016a). Another worrisome and unique challenge to cassava breeding in East Africa is the menace of cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) caused by two Ipomoviruses: Ugandan cassava brown streak virus and Cassava brown streak virus (Alicai et al. 2016;Kawuki et al. 2016). Collectively, these conundrums of low DMC and CBSD that directly affect root quality hamper speedy development and dissemination of provitamin A cassava clones in eastern Africa. It is for such situations that tools for implementing efficient crop improvement programs to address intricate breeding obstacles are being optimized (Ahmar et al. 2020).For example, the rapid advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have enabled the use of genome-wide markers for implementing genomic selection (GS), a tool that can significantly enhance the efficiency of crop breeding (Bhat et al. 2016). Essentially, GS aims to increase the speed and accuracy of selection in breeding programs by predicting the genetic value of individuals or lines at an early selection stage, or for individuals that cannot be directly phenotyped (Crossa et al. 2017). One of the salient features of GS is the use of high-density markers for prediction, which relies on genotyping at a high marker density to ensure most causal loci are in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with at least one marker (Jannink et al. 2010). By using dense markers to quantify Mendelian sampling, GS avoids the need for extensive progeny phenotyping, which saves cost and time by reducing the length of a breeding cycle, while enhancing genetic gain per selection cycle (Desta and Ortiz 2014). Consequently, GS can facilitate rapid crop improvement for relevant agronomic and enduser traits, as witnessed in different crops (Xu et al. 2018(Xu et al. , 2020)).A broad review of GS in plant breeding, detailing requirements for training population and features of prediction models, has been elegantly provided by Desta and Ortiz (2014). In fact, response of GS in crop improvement may be affected by factors such as model performance, sample size and relatedness, marker density, heritability and genetic architecture of traits, and the extent and distribution of LD between markers and quantitative trait loci (QTL) on the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) (Zhong et al. 2009). Thus, predictive accuracy varies among GS models depending on their assumptions and treatments of marker effects (Ornella et al. 2012).Indeed, results from both simulation and empirical studies have illustrated the efficacy and limitations of GS for several crops, including maize (Bernardo and Yu 2007), rice (Xu et al. 2018), barley (Nielsen et al. 2016), and wheat (Kristensen et al. 2018). Wolfe et al. (2017) reported some promising results depicting prospects for GS in cassava, with higher prediction accuracies for DMC (0.36-0.48) and cassava mosaic disease (CMD) (0.26-0.40) than those for fresh root yield attributes (<0.1). Relatedly, Kayondo et al. (2018) evaluated the accuracy of seven genomic prediction models using empirical data from 1301 cassava clones and reported predictive ability of 0.31-0.42 for CBSD severity in roots, indicating GS as a useful tool for CBSD resistance breeding. Furthermore, Ozimati et al. (2018) reported increased genomic prediction accuracies for CBSD resistance arising from optimized training populations and the prospect of East African training sets to predict CBSD in West African cassava germplasm.Motivated by these promising results from the pioneering efforts on the application and use of GS in cassava breeding, our study was aimed at exploring genomic prediction as a strategy for the rapid development of carotene-rich cassava product profiles suited for the growing conditions in East Africa. Broadly, this study was part of an ongoing effort to optimize and integrate GS into the provitamin A cassava breeding scheme in Uganda for rapid genetic improvement. The provitamin a cassava breeding pipeline currently utilizes locally adapted germplasm (Esuma et al. 2016a), with occasional introductions and introgression from the West African germplasm, where remarkable success has been achieved in cassava biofortification. Thus, we evaluated genomic prediction ability within the base population for provitamin A carotenoids and assessed the effectiveness of this population to predict performance of subsequent breeding cycles and that of West African germplasm. Specifically, we tested (i) the predictive ability for TCC, DMC, and CBSD across different statistical models and (ii) the utility of QTL markers in genomic prediction for TCC.Three sets of germplasm were used in this study. First, a panel of 280 clones segregating for root quality and agronomic attributes were selected from a cassava breeding population at National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), Uganda. This panel constituted the training population, hereafter referred to as Cycle 0. Second, a subset of 50 Cycle 0 clones with the highest breeding values for carotenoid content was identified (through cross-validation described hereafter) as progenitors and planted in a crossing nursery at Namulonge to generate cycle one (Cycle 1) population, during the period 2016/2017. Following seed germination and preliminary screening at nursery and seedling stages, 352 Cycle 1 genotypes were cloned and evaluated in 2018. Third was a set of 648 clones derived from 80 progenitors introduced from West Africa (WA) through International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA); this population segregated for carotenoids and DMC.The Cycle 0 population was evaluated at two locations, Namulonge (0.52166458 N, 32.608997564 E) and at Serere (1.4994 N, 33.5490 E) during the 2017/2018 cropping season in Uganda. Both locations are characterized by high prevalence of CBSD causing viruses and high whitefly vector populations (Alicai et al. 2019) known to transmit such viruses. Cycle 1 and WA populations were evaluated at one location (Namulonge), due to the limitation of planting material. Trials were laid out in augmented design with $25-30 plots per block and four checks. Each plot was represented by a single row of 10 plants spaced at 1 Â 1 m. In all trials, CBSD susceptible cultivar TME 204 was planted as spreader rows to provide source of virus inoculum.At harvest (12 months after planting), all plants in a plot were uprooted. Total carotenoid content was assessed by visually scoring the intensity of pigmentation of the root parenchyma on a qualitative scale of 1-8 ( Sa ´nchez et al. 2006). We used the visual color scale for carotenoids content as it was the available high throughput phenotyping method the time of data collection and previous reports have indicated a strong positive correlation between carotenoid content assessed visually and quantitatively (Esuma et al. 2016a). Furthermore, all roots harvested per plot were pooled and screened for CBSD necrosis severity using a scale of 1-5 described by Hillocks and Thresh (2000), where: 1 ¼ no necrosis, 2 ¼ 5% of the root is necrotic, 3 ¼ 6-10% of the root is necrotic, 4 ¼ 11-25% of the root is necrotic and mild root constriction and 5 ¼ >25% of the root necrotic and severe root constriction. DMC was estimated from approximately 200 g of fresh root samples that were oven-dried into a constant weight at 105 C for 24 hours. Subsequently, DMC was computed using the formula:where DSW ¼ dry sample weight and FSW ¼ fresh sample weight.Leaf tissues were collected from all test clones evaluated and sent to Intertek and Diversity Array Technology Pty Ltd. (http:// www.diversityarrays.com/) for DNA extraction and genotyping, respectively. Briefly, DArTseq technology relies on a complexity reduction method to enrich genomic representations with single copy sequences and subsequently perform next-generation sequencing using HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, USA). Further detail of the DArTseq genotyping process has been described by Kilian et al. (2012).In our case, sequences of the genomic representations were aligned to cassava reference genome v6.1. Eventually, 13,675 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were selected using the following quality control parameters (Kilian et al. 2012): (i) the reproducibility of 100%, (ii) the overall call rate over 95%, and (iii) the polymorphic information content between 0.3 and 0.5. Genotypes were coded as 0 (homozygous for reference allele), 1 (heterozygous), and 2 (homozygous SNP). Genotype data were imputed to a panel of 23,431 SNPs using the Beagle 5.0 algorithm (Browning et al. 2018) and a reference panel of 20,733 mostly East African cassava haplotypes, derived from a combination of genotyping-by-sequencing and DArTseq-LD. The data are available here: ftp://ftp.cassavabase.org/marnin_datasets/ nextgenImputattion2019/.Phenotypic dataset for each trial was considered independent and analyzed separately using a two-step genomic prediction approach. In the first step, we fitted linear mixed models accounting for each trial's design and extracted the best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs) of the clone effects for TCC, DMC, and CBSD root necrosis using the lme4 package for R statistical software (Bates et al. 2015). For Cycle 0 that was evaluated in two locations, we fitted a model ywhere vector b was the fixed effect for grand mean and location, with the corresponding incidence matrix X; vector c and corresponding incidence matrix Z g was the random effect for clones (g) such thatc $ N 0; Ir 2 c À Á ; vector b with its corresponding incidence matrix Z block(l) represented random effect for blocks nested in locations (l) such that b $ N 0; Ir 2 b; vector l and incidence matrix Z g.l represented random effect of genotype-environment interaction; and ewas the residual such thate $ N 0; Ir 2 e À Á . For Cycle 1 clones and the West African introductions, each evaluated in one location, we fitted a linear mixed model ywherey was the vector of raw phenotypes, b was a fixed effect of grand mean, and Z block b represented the random effect for blocks.Variance components were extracted from the models for estimation plot-based heritability (H) as:where r 2 c was the clone variance, r 2 cl was the variance attributed to genotype by location interaction (excluded for trials conducted in one location) and r 2 e was the model residual variance. Furthermore, we used the mixed.solve function in R to fit a singlestage genomic best linear unbiased prediction (G-BLUP) model, with the grand mean and location as fixed effects and clone effects treated randomly. Eventually, SNP-based heritability (h 2 Þwas computed as:where r 2 a clone was the additive genetic variance and r 2 e was the residual variance.The total genetic value of each individual was estimated as BLUP extracted from the mixed linear models following the procedure described by Garrick et al. (2009). To avoid applying shrinkage to the same data twice (at the first step and subsequent genomic prediction step), the BLUPs were de-regressed as:where PEV represented the prediction error variance for the BLUPs and r 2 c was the clone variance. The de-regressed BLUPs were used in subsequent genomic prediction analyses.To assess population structure, we used 23,431 polymorphic DArTSeq markers filtered to keep only SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) ! 0.01. Using the A.mat function built in the rrBLUP R package (Endelman 2011), we constructed a realized genomic relationship matrix (K) from SNP data. Finally, principal component analysis (PCA) was done on the genomic relationship matrix, using the prcomp function in R. The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) were used to visualize population structure.We used the BLUPs in a fivefold cross-validation scheme, with 10 replications, to evaluate prediction ability for TCC, DMC, and CBSDrs across four parametric GS models: (i) genomic BLUP (G-BLUP), (ii) BayesA, (iii) BayesB, and (iv) Bayesian Lasso. The main features of these genome-wide prediction models have been reviewed by Desta and Ortiz (2014). To perform cross-validation with G-BLUP, the A.mat function in the R package rrBLUP was initially used to construct a genomic realized relationship matrix from SNP marker dosages and GEBVs obtained after fitting a linear mixed model using the mixed.solve function in the same package. Cross-validations for Bayesian models were computed with the BGLR package (Perez and de los Campos 2014), with model parameters nIter and burnIn fixed at 10,000 and 1000, respectively.To achieve cross-validation for each fold in a replication, the total number of genotypes in a population was divided into five equal proportions such that four groups at a time formed the training set to build the prediction model, while the fifth group was the test set. For example, when cross-validation was performed for Cycle 0 (n ¼ 280), 224 genotypes were used as training set while the remaining 56 individuals were used as validation set. This process was repeated for each of the five folds across 10 replications. Prediction abilities were computed as Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) between GEBVs predicted for the test set and the corresponding BLUPs obtained from the first step of the analysis.The purpose of GWAS analysis was to identify chromosome markers associated with each phenotype and use such information to design kernel-based cross-validation schemes. Thus, we surveyed for QTL for all the three traits using genome-wide association study (GWAS), using 632 individuals (constituted by Cycle 0 and Cycle 1) and 23,431 polymorphic markers filtered at MAF >0.05. To avoid any potential upward bias of prediction abilities, we performed GWAS in the training set of each fold across 10 replications of the cross-validation scheme, such that kernel-based predictions were done in the test set of the respective fold. For example, for each fold, $506 genotypes (training set) representing 80% of the 632 individuals were used for GWAS and the remaining $126 (test set) used for kernel-based predictions.Specifically, GWAS was implemented using a linear mixed model in the R package rrBLUP following the modified methodology described by Isidro- Sa ´nchez et al. (2017). The linear mixed model fitted included a kinship matrix and the first three principal components to account for population structure. We generated quantile-quantile and Manhattan plots generated with the R package qqman (Turner 2014) and used them to evaluate the association mapping model and chromosome-wise association signals such that SNPs with P-values less than the 5% Bonferroni threshold were considered to be significantly associated with phenotypes.Based on DArTseq markers used in this study, GWAS results for DMC and CBSD did not show significant association signals.However, we identified one QTL for TCC on chromosome 1, which was consistently the same for each of the five folds across the 10 replications, with $49 markers meeting the Bonferroni threshold of association significance (Supplementary Figure S1). Subsequently, we designed four GWAS-guided cross-validation schemes for TCC: (a) single-kernel with significant QTL markers on chromosome 1, (b) single-kernel with all chromosome 1 markers, (c) single-kernel excluding all markers on chromosome 1, and (d) multi-kernel model that included the significant QTL markers and the rest of the markers fitted as independent kernels in G-BLUP model (Morota and Gianola 2014). Finally, we performed GWAS with all the 632 individuals and used the output to predicted TCC in the West African population along the four prediction scenarios.Total carotenoids content had the highest broad-sense, varying between 0.68 and 0.73, while CBSDrs had the lowest estimates (0.36-0.50) (Table 1). We did not record DMC in Cycle 1 clones due to insufficient quantity of roots arising from small plot sizes. Similar trends were observed for narrow-sense (SNP-based) heritability estimates, with the highest values (0.61-0.71) recorded for TCC and lowest (0.29-0.40) for CBSDrs (Table 1).PCA was used to describe population structure in the genetic materials analyzed. Grouping clones by the first two PCs (PC1 and PC2) showed no clear-cut differentiation among the three populations (Figure 1), with the PCs explaining 28.2 and 15% of the total genetic variation, respectively. Nonetheless, some WA clones tended to drift from other populations along PC2 (Figure 1).We performed cross-validation under three scenarios: within (a) Cycle 0 (n ¼ 280 genotypes), (b) Cycle 0 combined with Cycle 1 (n ¼ 632 genotypes), and (c) the West African population (n ¼ 648 genotypes). Distribution of predictive abilities across the five folds and ten replications is presented in Figure 2, with an overall trend showing the highest predictive ability for TCC and the lowest for CBSDrs. For the cross-validation performed within Cycle 0, we recorded the highest mean prediction ability for TCC across all models, varying from 0.35 for BayesB and Bayesian Lasso to 0.44 for G-BLUP (Supplementary Table S1). Across all traits, G-BLUP had the highest mean predictive ability compared to the rest of the models tested across all three traits.In the second cross-validation scenario that combined Cycle 0 combined with Cycle 1 clones, mean increase of 12.1% in predictive ability was recorded for TCC, with the highest increase (20%) recorded for Bayesian Lasso (Supplementary Table S1). In this scenario, the highest mean prediction ability of 0.52 was recorded for TCC with G-BLUP while the lowest value of 0.39 was noted for the trait with BayesB. Similarly, increase in training population size resulted into an increase of prediction ability for CBSDrs, except for BayesB that had no appreciable (0%) change.Cross validation within the West African population showed similar trend, with the highest predictive ability 0.47 recorded for TCC with G-BLUP. For this population, predictive abilities for CBSDrs were remarkably low compared to values recorded in Cycle 0 and with Cycle 1.We predicted each of the three traits across the four models under the following scenarios: Cycle 0 to predict performance of Cycle 1 and West African (WA) clones and a combination of Cycle 0 and with Cycle 1 to predict WA clones. First, we noted generally higher cross-population predictive ability for TCC than for other traits across all models, with the highest values recorded with G- BLUP. For example, the highest predictive ability of 0.43 was recorded for TCC when using the Cycle 0 to predict the performance of Cycle 1 (Table 2). However, when the Cycle 0 and Cycle 1 were combined to predict TCC in WA population, the predictive ability was relatively low (0.27) compared to the value of 0.34 obtained when the prediction was performed with Cycle 0 alone. A similar trend of low predictive ability in the WA population was noted for TCC across the other three models, with the lowest value (0.16) recorded with Bayesian Lasso in the scenario.Predictive abilities for CBSDrs were particularly low in all scenarios. For instance, the highest predictive ability (0.12) was only recorded when Cycle 0 was used to predict CBSDrs in Cycle 1 with G-BLUP; other models had negligible predictions for CBSDrs (Table 2). In fact, when Cycle 0 was used to predict CBSDrs in WA, all results were close to zero, with the highest predictive ability recorded was 0.05 for G-BLUP (Table 2). Lastly, we only tested the scenario of Cycle 0 predicting DMC in WA, as this trait was not assessed in Cycle 1. In this case, the highest predictive ability was 0.34 with G-BLUP and the lowest was 0.25 from Bayesian Lasso (Table 2).All marker-trait associations for DMC and CBSDrs were nonsignificant (data not shown). GWAS for each training set per fold consistently revealed one QTL for TCC on chromosome 1, with $49 markers meeting the Bonferroni threshold for genome-wide association signal (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S1). Subsequently, GWAS-based prediction for TCC was performed in the respective test sets for each fold using cross-validation scheme with G-BLUP, which presented the highest prediction abilities compared to other models tested. The mean predictive abilities for the four scenarios of GWAS-guided cross-validation were 0.56 for single-kernel containing all chromosome 1 markers, 0.54 for single-kernel with significant chromosome 1 markers, 0.48 for single-kernel excluding all markers on chromosome 1, and 0.63 for the multi-kernel model that included the significant QTL markers and the rest of the markers fitted as independent kernels (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S2). These scenarios led to better predictions than the case with naive model i.e., without segmentation of chromosome markers, with the exception where single kernel excluding all chromosome 1 markers was used. Narrow-sense heritability estimates were proportionately higher for scenarios of predicting with markers on chromosome 1 and the multi-kernel approach than for the case of excluding chromosome 1 (Figure 4). When the GWAS-guided approach was used to predict TCC in WA, we noted similar pattern of the highest predictive ability (0.64) with multi-kernel scenario and the least (0.25) for single-kernel excluding chromosome 1 markers (Supplementary Table S2).The rapid increase in the global human population, predicted to reach 10 billion by 2050 (Bongaarts 2009;Henderson and Loreau 2019), highlights the urgent need for deployment of high yielding, resilient and nutritious crop varieties to vulnerable societies (Ray et al. 2013;Hickey et al. 2019). The nutritional impacts of biofortification evidenced through staples like orange-fleshed sweet potato (Jenkins et al. 2015) provide motivation for development of cassava enriched with provitamin A carotenoids as nutritious staple in sub-Saharan Africa. Collectively, TCC, DMC, and CBSD resistance are must-have traits for product profiles targeting deployment of provitamin A cassava varieties in eastern Africa. Breeding efforts, including our current results, have indicated moderate to high broad-sense heritability (0.56-0.73) for TCC and DMC, implying the possibility of making meaningful genetic gains for both traits through phenotypic recurrent selection (Ceballos et al. 2013;Esuma et al. 2016b). Indeed, the high heritability for TCC has already facilitated the identification of cassava cultivars with high levels of ß-carotene, which constitutes the bulk of carotenoids in cassava, with some varieties released for on-farm production in West Africa (Ayinde et al. 2017;Eyinla et al. 2019). However, the high costs and drudgery associated with phenotyping cassava roots for TCC and DMC (Ceballos et al. 2013), the apparent negative correlation between TCC and DMC (Njoku et al. 2015;Esuma et al. 2016b), and the unique challenge of CBSD in eastern and southern Africa (Alicai et al. 2016(Alicai et al. , 2019) ) were a major motivation for testing the prospects for GS as a tool for improving these traits in our provitamin A cassava breeding pipeline.We found relatively low broad-sense heritability (0.36-0.50) for severity of CBSD root necrosis, which relates to the trait's quantitative nature (Kulembeka et al. 2012;Masumba et al. 2017) strongly influenced by environmental factors, which complicates selection (Pariyo et al. 2015). However, heritability estimates above 0.5 have been reported by Kayondo et al. (2018) and Ozimati et al. (2019) for CBSD necrosis in populations evaluated for GWAS (1300 clones) and GS (922 clones), respectively. As expected, we noted lower estimates of SNP-based heritability for the three traits compared to the respective broad-sense heritability (Table 1). This could be attributable to under-tagging of causal loci by markers in our analysis (de los Campos and Toro 2017). Ozimati et al. (2019) observed similar trends for SNP-based heritability for several agronomic traits in a panel of >1000 clones evaluated for GS.Based on the cross-validation results, predictive abilities were largely consistent across traits and prediction models. First, we noted a downward pattern for predictive ability TCC > DMC > CBSDrs across all models, and for both scenarios of small and increased size of training set. TCC is largely a qualitative trait (Welsch et al. 2010) for which genomic prediction is expected to be an effective tool (Zhang et al. 2019). Mean predictive abilities for DMC were generally low, ranging between 0.21 and 0.33, similar to the range of 0.29-0.34 reported by Wolfe et al. (2017) and Ozimati et al. (2018). Interestingly, in the same report, Wolfe et al. (2017) showed high predictive ability for DMC (0.63-0.67) in a cassava breeding population of IITA. The discrepancies in predictive abilities for DMC across breeding populations may relate to variation in heritability arising from differences in phenotyping methods of using specific gravity and oven-drying method and/or genetic differences of clones evaluated. Subsequently, efforts are being made to optimize high throughput methods like near infrared spectroscopy for efficient phenotyping of root quality traits (Belalcazar et al. 2016;Ikeogu et al. 2017), which could improve reliability of GS for improving such traits.Predictive abilities for CBSD resistance were generally low for all models tested in our analyses (mean of 0.20 for G-BLUP). Kayondo et al. (2018) highlighted GS as a promising tool to increase genetic gains for CBSD resistance in cassava, especially for nonparametric models like Random Forest and reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression, which capture both additive and nonadditive effects. It should be noted that Kayondo et al. (2018) used 1301 clones from NaCRRI's white-fleshed cassava breeding population phenotyped in at least three environments, which probably presented robust data for genomic prediction. Nonetheless, introgressing CBSD resistance into the provitamin A cassava breeding population could increase the genetic merit of these clones for CBSD resistance and their use in developing varieties relevant for production in farmer's fields.When we explored prospects of cross-population predictions, we noted higher predictive ability across Uganda's populations than in situations of predicting performance of WA clones. In evaluating the potential of East African training populations for genomic prediction of CBSD resistance in West African cassava germplasm, Ozimati et al. (2019) reported low predictive ability for the trait. Previous studies have indicated higher reliability of genomic predictions in populations that share ancestry with training sets than in situations of diverged genetic backgrounds where marker effects are likely to be different (De Roos et al. 2009;Lee et al. 2017). Indeed, a diagnosis of the second axis of PCA plot presented in Figure 1 shows an apparent drift of WA clones from the Ugandan clones, which is a manifestation of genetic difference. Nonetheless, this study revealed some possibility of predicting TCC and DMC in WA population using our cassava breeding population, with mean of 0.4 and 0.34, respectively, with G-BLUP. In this case, it would be possible to identify WA clones with superior GEBVs for TCC and DMC for further recombination with provitamin A cassava clones, which is a clever strategy to update a training set with useful alleles from external gene pools without disrupting genetic gain (Berro et al. 2019).Figure 4 Prediction abilities for GWAS-guided scenarios for total carotenoids content for within-sub population cross-validation scheme. SM ¼ scenario of predicting with significant QTL markers on chromosome 1 as single-kernel; CHR1 ¼ scenario of predicting with all chromosome 1 markers as singlekernel; CHR2-18 ¼ scenario of predicting with markers on chromosomes 2-18 only; WK ¼ scenario of predicting with significant QTL markers on chromosome 1 and the rest of the markers as independent kernels.However, the low-predictive ability for CBSDrs in the WA population could indicate low genetic merit of using WA cassava germplasm for CBSD resistance breeding, which reinforces the need for CBSD pre-emptive breeding as a precautionary measure for the accidental introduction and spread of CBSD in WA.Motivated by success attained by selection programs that exploit GWAS-aided prediction (Li et al. 2019), we assessed the suitability of this method for our GS scheme for provitamin A cassava. In this case, we noted increased predictive ability for TCC by incorporating its QTL as an independent kernel in the genomic prediction model. The QTL for TCC identified in this study is within the genomic vicinity of Manes.01G124200.1, a gene which encodes enzyme phytoene synthase known to catalyze accumulation of ß-carotene in plant tissues (Welsch et al. 2010;Kandianis et al. 2013). In our study, the QTL represented biological information in the form of large-effect SNPs, which can enhance genomic prediction when fitted as an independent kernel. In this case, partitioning genomic markers into two relationship matrices, one kernel comprising the QTL markers associated with TCC on chromosomes 1 and the rest of the markers as the second kernel, led to better estimation of GEBVs (Morota and Gianola 2014). Li et al. (2019) reported increase in prediction accuracies of GS models resulting from increase in the number of most significant SNPs fitted as fixed effects in a maize breeding population. The apparent increase in predictive ability in our scenario of fitting effects of significant QTL markers on chromosome 1 and the rest of markers as independent kernels signifies the advantage of GS over traditional marker-assisted selection in utilizing whole-genome markers to account for phenotypic variance unexplainable by markers linked to QTL.Taken together, the moderate to high predictive ability achieved for DMC and TCC in this study underpin the transformative ability of GS when adapted and integrated as a cassava breeding tool. We remark that GS offers a promise for rapid improvement of cassava for provitamin A carotenoids and DMC, especially when prediction models are properly chosen and tuned. In parallel, concerted efforts are required for further enrichment of provitamin A cassava breeding population with CBSD resistance alleles to make genomic prediction an effective tool for increasing gains for the trait. Results presented in this study complement ongoing efforts aimed at integrating the use of GS in cassava breeding programs."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0663580363.json b/main/part_2/0663580363.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b29c673a3d2b08bf726ff7ab221ab01aac64de4 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0663580363.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e50000694154085ff4f647468e9056de","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H049713.pdf","id":"70959996"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0e1ac36e-50bf-439d-a502-b4cda3d7b034","content":"The world is not on track to achieve Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 on clean water and sanitation by 2030. SDG 6 does not start off from the near achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, but rather from a newlowerbaseline that reflects more comprehensive and ambitious targets related to integrated water resource management, water quality and wastewater, water use efficiency and ecosystems.To achieve the vision of SDG 6, we need to rethink the underlying economics, engineering and management paradigms that guided water policy and investment in the past.The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by UN member states in 2015, challenges us to change the way we think about and manage water. SDG 6, which is dedicated completely to water, looks beyond targets related to drinking water supply and sanitation, and includes aspects of water quality and wastewater, water use and efficiency, ecosystems and integrated water resources management, among others. The broad spectrum of water-related targets reflects an increasing recognition that, if the world is to achieve sustainable development, then a set of challenges related to water resource management, resilience and governance need to be tackled as well. SDG 6 includes eight global targets, covering the entire water cycle. Targets 6.1 and 6.2 relate to the provision of drinking water and sanitation and hygiene services respectively. Target 6.3 covers treatment and reuse of wastewater and water quality and Target 6.4 water-use efficiency and scarcity. Integrated Water Resources Management including of transboundary waters is at the centre of Target 6.5, while protection and restoration of water-related ecosystems are covered in Target 6.6. Two additional targets for international cooperation and capacity-building (6.a) and participation (6.b) have also been set.Before SDG 6, internationally agreed global targets on water mostly focused on drinking water supply and sanitation. These include the efforts of the International Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Decade (1981-1990), the New Delhi Statement (1991-2000), and the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) (2001-2015). Within the MDG framework, water issues were viewed only in terms of extending access to drinking water supply and sanitation. Target C of MDG 7 on 'ensuring environmental sustainability' aimed to halve by 2015 the share of the world's population without access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation. The MDG target for drinking water was met, while the one for sanitation was missed 1 . The MDG monitoring approach, however, only measured access to improved water sources, without actually measuring whether or not these sources were 'safe' (i.e., free from contamination), as specified in the target. Improved sources are not always safe, meaning that if drinking water safety had been monitored alongside improved access, the MDG's drinking water target would have not been met 2 .The MDGs' experience had implications for the SDGs. First, the critiques related to some of the indicator definitions and monitoring approaches helped formulate the more ambitious SDG drinking water supply and sanitation targets. The MDGs' focus on coverage masked other aspects of service delivery, such as reliability, quality and affordability, which effectively impact water access. In order to account for these aspects, SDG 6.1 and 6.2 set targets and related indicators to provide universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water, sanitation and hygiene.Second, and more importantly, the MDG experience demonstrated the limitations of separating access to water and sanitation from water and wastewater management and governance. The MDGs' focus on water access reflected a world where the limiting factors to delivering water services were related to infrastructure, capital or management, not governance and the scarcity (both in terms of quality and quantity) and variability of the water resource. Although aspects related to water scarcity and wastewater were included in Agenda 21 adopted at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, they were not captured in the subsequent MDGs. This reflected a narrow view of water and sanitation, which viewed only its access aspects, without paying due attention to the equitable, sustainable and efficient use of freshwater resources and the proper treatment and re-use of wastewater.Today's reality of inequality, fragmented institutions, climate change, and environmental degradation means that now governance and water resource constraints are key determinants of our ability to extend and maintain access to drinking water and sanitation services and achieve sustainable development. This becomes even more pertinent as we need to consider the multiple demands for water, including environmental flows. This is why SDG 6 adopts a much broader set of water-related targets which extend well beyond improving access to drinking water supply and sanitation.Transitioning from the MDGs' focus on supply and sanitation at the turn of the millennium to the much broader framing of 'sustainable water and sanitation for all' of the SDGs poses numerous challenges.These include definitional and monitoring issues, which involve identifying indicators and measurement methods appropriate for different contexts, but also barriers to implementation arising from financing, capacity and governance issues 3 . Moreover, the SDGs' broader ambitions to leave no one behind and achieve transformative change mean that water policy efforts towards SDG 6 need to fast-track progress for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged 4 and to be integrated with a systemic action agenda 5 . Finally, the transition from the MDG to the SDG world implies a retreat from the near achievement of the water MDGsnoting that still about 2 billion people lack access to basic sanitation services such as latrines and, of these 2 billion, at least 673 million still practice open defecation. The SDGs start off from a lower baseline compared to the MDGs, encompassing more comprehensive and ambitious targets of water supply and sanitation and new targets related to integrated resource management, resilience, and governance.Transitioning from the MDGs to the SDGs also requires recognizing their importance for governance.Compared to the MDGs, the SDGs frame a universal sustainable development aspiration that was developed through an inclusive participatory process, rather than a narrow set of goals for meeting basic needs in lowincome countries. In doing so, they posit 'clean water and sanitation for all' not just as an issue of the 'developing world' but as a global priority. This is important for governance, as it causes a normative shift 6 : from water policy and investments to meet basic needs towards a global aspiration for sustainable water management for everyone, everywhere. In addition, the SDG's ambitions are engrained in a wide set of quantitative indicators that try to encompass all aspects of sustainable development, and not just a selected few as in the MDGs. This focus on numbers and benchmarking is important for governance because it contributes to more effective communication, setting of priorities and mobilization of attention and participation of stakeholders. Yet, governance by numbers can also create perverse incentives to over-focus on target achievement, while not all aspects can be measured numerically, and at the expense of other policy objectives as well as a host of practical measurement challenges 7 .The way forward: ambitious targets require ambitious solutions 89 The world's progress so far has not matched this substantive increase in the ambition and scope of the global water policy agenda. In 2018, the UN published the report: \"Sustainable Development Goal 6 Synthesis Report on Water and Sanitation 2018\" which reviewed progress towards SDG 6 at global and regional levels. The report found that, although progress has been made, the world is not on track to meet SDG 6 by 2030. Beyond this headline finding, the report also highlighted indicator issues, both in relation to their value in supporting the targets and the availability of data to measure and monitor them, and the importance of capacity development and of taking research into policy and practice to enable progress Unless the ambition of SDG 6 is matched by an equally ambitious set of actions and solutions, we won't be able to achieve clean water and sanitation for all in the next decade. Technological, information and data science advances offer tremendous opportunities to speed progress towards SDG 6. New membranes and materials enhance the potential for water recycling water accounting using earth observation, ground monitoring and models provides detailed information on evolving water status and use to underpin water allocation decisions, and data storage and processing improve humanitarian efforts in water-related disaster relief.However, technology alone won't solve the world's water issues and rise to the challenge posed by SDG 6. The potential for these disruptive technologies to 'solve water' can only be fully captured by changing some of the underlying paradigms that have guided global water policy in the past. Here we outline three water policy paradigmswater economics, water engineering and water managementand describe how they need to be revised to achieve SDG 6.The water economics paradigm of the 20 th century treated water as an abundant resource, paying little attention to its scarcity value, its opportunity costs and the costs of pollution (i.e., economic externalities).The focus was on minimizing the financial costs of delivering water (treating capital as the key scarce resource) rather than on the value of the water itself (recognizing it as a scarce resource). Water is an increasingly scarce resource and needs to be treated accordingly. Yet most countries today still significantly subsidize water, which encourages overuse and disproportionately benefits upper-income groups in developing countries where the poor have more limited access to water 10 . Economic and regulatory policies that signal water scarcity are therefore an important partbut not allof the solution. The human right to water and sanitation, the critical water needs of the environment and unique cultural characteristics of water make it imperative to identify and navigate potential non-economic trade-offs between equity and efficiency. This will ensure access to all households including the poor and the more vulnerable, and sustain aquatic ecosystems and their environmental services and, increasingly, their rights 11 . In order to sustainably maintain the resource and halt unsustainable use, more attention needs to be devoted to the incentives, behaviors and political economy of water resource allocation and management 12 . This will be particularly crucial for achieving SDG 6 in rural areas, where poverty is most prevalent and where progress towards global water targets has been slower 13 .Changing the water economics paradigm also means extending the traditional approach to the evaluation of water investments. Economic valuation based on cost-benefit analysis needs to consider the multiple values attached to water (e.g., environmental and socio-cultural values), better account for natural capital (e.g., wealth lost through groundwater depletion and degradation), and to broaden the notion of benefits to include potential and indirect benefits of water investments (e.g., enhancement of ecosystem services through resource recovery from sanitation). Moreover, water investments need to be evaluated over longer time periods to avoid optimizing for short-term needs and discounting uncertainty about resource availability, climate risks and the costs of learning (i.e., maintaining additional options until more information is available) 14 . A renewed and broader view of the costs and benefits of water investments is aligned to the broader scope of SDG 6 compared to the MDGs, when investments were typically appraised using a few metrics of direct benefits to certain users.The traditional approach to water engineering also needs to be revisited. In the 20 th century, water systems were designed to often transfer water over long distances, for it to be used and then discharged back to the environment in most cases without proper treatment. This linear and often centralized approach to water engineering has served society well with, for instance, major achievements related to public health, food production or flood protection. However, its shortcomings are well-know: it is typically energy intensive, ecologically damaging, excessively reliant on capital intensive projects and often not inclusive. Research and practicehave shown that this approach misses the opportunities linked to better demand management, decentralized solutions, nature-based solutions and circularity (e.g., resource reuse and recovery).Water engineering in the Anthropocene means designing systems that recycle wastewater and differentiate between 'waters' of different sources, costs, qualities, and reliabilities, each utilized for specific needs and purposes. It also entails diversifying supply sources and capturing the opportunities offered by nature-based solutions that use, or mimic, natural processes to cost-effectively deliver water security for all. 15 Traditional water engineering is based on the concept of stationarity, which assumes that the long-term probability distributions of relevant hydrological variables are time-invariant and plans water resources systems to be reliable up to a given probability. Under a changing climate and other environmental and societal changes, however, this assumption is no longer valid. This requires moving beyond the concepts of reliability and optimality, which evaluate engineering designs over a narrow set of objectives and possible future conditions, to focus on robustness and flexibility in the face of uncertainty and change.Finally, water management needs to become better capable of dealing with trade-offs and uncertainty. In an uncertain world, adaptive and integrated water management needs to substitute approaches that do not consider interconnections, complexity and change. Integrated approaches help to identify and minimize trade-offs, unraveling unexpected impacts of water policies on other sectors and SDGs. They also promote inclusive water management, by bringing together different sectors and stakeholders at all scales from local to transboundary. Although the adaptive and integrated water management paradigm has been promoted with mixed success for decades, the advent of new data sources, tools and frameworks means that water managers are now able to implement these approaches to systematically consider interactions across scales and among sectors and stakeholders 16 .To achieve SDG 6, we will need to revisit these paradigms and reconsider the way we think about and manage our water. We can no longer treat clean water as an overly abundant resource available for the taking. We will need to bring tremendous ingenuity, research and innovation to develop solutions that safeguard and develop water resources sustainably and to use water wisely and equitably. Unfortunately, we are 'off-track' to achieve this. We must all redouble our efforts for a sustainable water future."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0689229338.json b/main/part_2/0689229338.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3f4f85e4206b9a636d7e4ba1a24f9c5d9d3f70d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0689229338.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5dad5ddccea25bfec0238715ea769286","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a291b781-62f1-4af5-a026-2057911d6f4f/retrieve","id":"-700064487"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"50c94b05-bd26-4895-a17b-59944cd28b20","content":"P1327 -Building foresight portfolio for WHEAT AFS, including synthesis, gap analysis and new studies, as input in conducting priority setting for WHEAT AFS"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0705033353.json b/main/part_2/0705033353.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38d9f701cb6c9870b5ae5fe6fb84b4c394076d13 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0705033353.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4054d6df33b061255b337a973318fe09","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b84cad02-b1f4-4d2d-af0a-51f745fe24d8/retrieve","id":"-1101958045"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9239298b-55cc-4b5c-9d38-84f30c7692d8","content":"• The advance time of irrigation was recorded at different furrow gradients and discharge rates. Four furrow gradients (0.5 %, 1 %, 2 %, and 2.5 %) were chosen at different sites. The furrow discharges were selected out of the recommended discharge sizes in the feasibility study. Three discharges (0.3 l/s, 0.6 l/s and 0.8 l/s) were considered.• Three adjacent furrows of length 90-110 m are prepared. The central furrow was used as an experimental furrow while the two adjacent furrows receiving equal discharge with the center furrow were used as buffers.• Two measuring RBC flumes were placed at the beginning and end of each center furrow. The application was terminated when the stream flow through the furrow outlet remains at steady flow.• The travel time of water advancing through the furrow (advance time) was recorded at 10 m interval for the whole furrow length using stopwatch. The advance time was examined in two irrigation cycles, first irrigation period (February) and second irrigation period (April).• The advance time vary greatly among the discharge rates when the furrow length increases. For longer furrow lengths (90-110m) the advance time was very slow and become difficult to establish appropriate irrigation operation rule and optimize the irrigation management for the whole scheme. However, in most of the test sites, the advance time was more or less similar within 30-40 m furrow lengths except at 0.3l/s.• In the 1 st irrigation, the respective advance time to cover 30 and 40 m length was on average 17-28 min and 28-56 min per furrow at 0.6 l/s and 16-18 min and 25-30 min at 0.8 l/s discharge rate (Fig. 1). • In the 2 nd irrigation, the advance time to cover 30 and 40 m length became short, ranging from 14-18 min and 24-32 min per furrow at 0.6 l/s and 14-18 min and 20-28 min per furrow at 0.8 l/s discharge rate (Fig. 2).• Therefore the discharge rate that requires shorter application time is preferable as far as its erosive capacity is low. It is thus feasible to suggest 0.6-0.8 l/s application rate for slopes up to 2-2.5 %.• The advance time of water to cover 90-110 m furrow length at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 2.5 % field slopes was 213, 173, 150, and 369 min at 1st irrigation, and 134, 182, 221, and 97 min at 2nd irrigation respectively (Fig. 3).• The effect of slope results in great variation of advance time at any point along the furrow length.• The inconsistency of advance time against field slope was due to the irregularity of the field and non-uniform surface roughness, for instance, at 2.5% field slope, the advance time is extremely slow at 1st irrigation.• Comparing the 1st and 2nd irrigation cycles, the advance time become shorter when the field gets smoother as a result of further tillage operation in the 2nd irrigation cycle.• The existing operational furrow length at Koga is extremely long which lead to very low application efficiency•With the given furrow length, irrigation application time per furrow is long and under such design it is difficult to establish appropriate irrigation operation rules among users for the whole scheme.•The advance time by furrow length graphs revealed that optimum furrow length at different sites can only be possible at short advance or application time.•In order to maximize application efficiency and minimize the losses, examining and determining an optimum furrow length before the operation of the whole scheme is essential•Irregular surfaces significantly affect the furrow length, optimum discharge, the application time and then application efficiency. It implies that land leveling work needs due attention so as to improve the overall efficiency of the irrigation scheme.Gizaw Desta Gessesse 1 (desta.gizaw@yahoo.com), Menelik Getaneh 1 , and Amare Tsigie 2Furrow irrigation is the recommended method for the distribution of water to the fields at Koga irrigation scheme, found in Western Gojam, Mecha wereda. However, most surface irrigation systems have inherent inefficiencies due to deep percolation on the upper end and runoff at the lower end of the field.A properly managed surface system can attain efficiencies of 60% or better. In a study conducted by Kassa (2003) at Melka Werer, with a furrow length of 200 m and different inflow rates, the maximum attainable application efficiency is 62 to 64%.The strategies to improve furrow irrigation efficiencies is by reducing runoff and deep percolation losses. These losses depend on furrow length, furrow gradient, discharge, and cutoff time which need to be optimized by irrigators to improve efficiency. This paper presents the advance time of furrow irrigation based on field data from Koga under different discharge rates and furrow gradients. We acknowledge Koga consultancy office for granting the research "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0713021325.json b/main/part_2/0713021325.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce7223a59f62d322804fd20a5fa8a6f5bb8e4fc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0713021325.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e64efa4fde8cf2c34eb0f122c8ba65f1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/c2ddaae2-1e06-437b-be5f-7f00c348caed/content","id":"-672261607"},"keywords":["Subjects: Agriculture & Environmental Sciences","Soil Sciences","Food Chemistry Inorganic fertilizer","maize","profitability","smallholder farmers","survey Citation information"],"sieverID":"eb2590b5-62c1-48ca-b2ea-6e5a40e52aad","content":"Inorganic fertilizer is one of the key technologies that could enhance crop productivity. However, farmers are still using lower than the recommended rates and yet there are a lot of farmers who are not using fertilizers at all. In this study, we analyze determinants and profitability of fertilizer use using a survey data collected from 174 randomly selected maize producers in NonoBenja District, Ethiopia. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Heckman's two-stage model, net profit analysis, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. Results show that the sampled respondents on average applied 142.8 kg/ha inorganic fertilizer (NPS+Urea) which is only 71.5% of the recommended rate. Age of household head, farm income, and use of input credit affected the probability of fertilizer use positively. Education level of household head, livestock holding and frequency of contact with extension agent positively influenced both the probability and intensity of fertilizer use whereas perception on cost of production influenced both the use and intensity of use negatively. Off-farm income positively influenced the intensity of fertilizer use. Farmers applying the recommended and above the recommended rates of inorganic fertilizer in maize production were more profitable than those applying lower than the recommended rates. Results imply that smallholders Mideksa Dabessa Iticha ABOUT THE AUTHOR Mideksa Dabessa joined the research system in Ethiopia in 2016. Since then, he has served as researcher and lecturer with capabilities. He has worked as Agricultural expert from 2009 to 2016 in the Ethiopia and then he join University. He did his MSc on the determinants and Profitability of inorganic fertilizer use in maize production in Ethiopia. This particular manuscript is one output of his MSc research project. His involvement and significant contribution resulted in capacity building and research specially adoption of agricultural new technologies (mainly common inorganic fertilizer, soybean, and improved forage). He also authored several publications in journal articles and review proceedings. Mideksa has been awarded for such outstanding accomplishment. Currently, he is served as lecture and researcher atOromia region in Ethiopia is endowed with diverse agro-ecologies that are suitable for different farming systems found in the region. Mixed crop-livestock production is the typical farming system in Oromia region of Ethiopia. Maize is the main crop produced through the country. Inorganic fertilizer use in Maize production among the cereal crop is adapted by farmers in Nono Benja District of Oromia region in Ethiopia. However, despite importance of inorganic fertilizer use in improving the soil fertility through nutrient balancing and increasing yield, only very limited research and development efforts have been made to improve its use and intensity of use in Ethiopia particularly in Nono Benja District. Ascertaining constraints along the use and intensity use of inorganic fertilizer is important not only to use it as baseline information to setting up recommended national inorganic fertilizer use in maize production improvement programs, but also it ensures farmers profitability.Poor agricultural productivity is one of the main challenges to achieve food security and to reduce poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa and particularly in Ethiopia. Considering the fact that soil fertility is one of the biggest challenges, an obvious strategy is to increase inorganic fertilizer application at recommended level and to promote good agronomic practices to enhance productivity (Rashid et al., 2014). Although maize is one of the most productive crops in Ethiopia, it is not playing the expected potential role in ensuring food security due to various factors like poor soil fertility (lack of nutrient), low external input use and poor agronomic management (Abdulkadir et al., 2017).In general, land degradation due to up slope cultivation, deforestation, flooding, soil acidity, and limited use of technologies are some of the major factors slowing agricultural productivity in Ethiopia. Low agricultural productivity combined with highly increasing population would put Ethiopia under a series challenge of food security. To tackle this and associated challenges, the government of Ethiopia put enhancing and sustaining agricultural productivity at the center of Ethiopia's development strategies. The country has consistently allocated more than 10% of its public spending on the agricultural sector (Mogues et al., 2008). In addition, more public spending was invested heavily in rural infrastructure and agricultural intensification with special attention to the extension services and fertilizer use (Byerlee et al., 2007;Mogues et al., 2008).Despite the unreserved efforts of the Ethiopian government and other development organizations supporting agricultural transformation in the country, agricultural productivity growth remains low and majority of smallholder farmers practice low-input low-output production systems. Use of yield enhancing purchased inputs like fertilizer is very low (Fufa & Hassan, 2006). Studies show that only 30-40% of Ethiopian farmers use fertilizer and those who do use apply on average only 37-40 kg/ha(NPS+Urea), which is below the recommended rate (Hailu, 2016;Spielman et al., 2013). However, it is generally agreed that optimum use of fertilizer at farm level have the tendency of improving soil fertility leading to rise in agricultural productivity and the profitability of a given technology (Abubakar, 2014).Improving productivity and profitability of smallholder farming is the main pathway out of poverty in using agriculture technology (World Bank, 2008). Improved agricultural productivity for smallholders can reduce poverty and improve household welfare (Abraham et al., 2014). However, in Ethiopia increased fertilizer prices and the concomitant decrease in output prices have been the most important factors associated with use of fertilizer (Fufa & Hassan, 2006).In Ethiopia, majority of fertilizer is used for cereals production, mainly teff, maize, wheat, barley and sorghum. According to CSA (2015) estimates, 90% of fertilizers were applied to those first three major cereal crops. Teff holds the largest share in fertilizer use among the cereals (32%), maize (29%), and wheat (25%).Several studies have been conducted to explain factors affecting the adoption and intensity of fertilizer use in Ethiopia at different places and times by using different models (e.g., Beshir et al., 2012;Ketema & Kebede, 2017;Negera & Bashargo, 2014;Yirga & Hassan, 2013). However, the currently available knowledge about the low adoption and low intensity of fertilizer use is not sufficient due the fact that the determinants are different from place to place. Also, previous studies could not show the relationship among use and intensity of fertilizer use in crop and its profitability (Ketema & Kebede, 2017). This paper extended to fill this gap. NonoBenja is known for maize dominated cropping system, with heterogeneous farming community to get sample households with and without fertilizer use. This study is, therefore, aimed at assessing the determinants and profitability of fertilizer use in maize production among the smallholder maize farmers in NonoBenja district.The remaining sections are structured as follows. Section 2 presents methodology including sampling procedures and method of data analysis. Results are presented and discussed in section 3, and section 4 presents conclusion and policy implications.This study was conducted in NonoBenja district, Jimma zone, Oromia region, in Ethiopia. The district is located 156 km North of Jimma town and 263 km South West of Addis Ababa. The district experienced minimum and maximum mean temperatures of 14°C and 30°C yearly, respectively, and relative humidity between 80% and 90% that falls to about 40% in the dry season. The rainfall pattern is unimodal and it ranges from 780 to 2000 mm. The soil of the district was fine-textured heavy and loamy soil type with a pH of 6.0. Based on CSA (CSA (Central Statistical Agency), 2013), the total household of the district was 9909 (9641 male-headed and 268 female-headed). The economic base of the residents is mixed farming. Individual smallholder farmers are the sole and dominant production units. The agricultural sector is highly dependent on rain-fed cropping system.A two-stage sampling technique was used to select sample respondents. First, by considering maize production uniformity in all kebeles of the district and taking into consideration the time, budget and human resource necessary for the study, from the total of 19 rural kebeles, 4 kebeles namely; Abiyu Gibe, Wayu, Gurifat, and Ilu were randomly selected. In the second stage, a list of all smallholder maize farmers in the four kebeles were obtained and stratified into users and nonusers of fertilizer in maize production. Then, 174 households (114 users and 60 non-users of inorganic fertilizer in maize production) were randomly selected from total 1899 households in these sampled kebeles in the district.Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from primary and secondary sources. The primary data were collected through structured interview schedule, focus group discussion and key informant interview. The quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaire implemented by trained enumerators who could speak the local language. The questionnaire was pretested on 20 similar farmers with the sampled household, but who were not included in the final survey. Finally, the questionnaire was translated from English to AfaanOromoo (local language of the study area) and implemented. Additional primary data were collected from key informants including district administrative bodies, experts from agricultural offices and cooperative offices; as well as from four focus groups (one from each kebele), each consisting of eight farmers. Secondary data were collected from published and unpublished materials.In non-experimental data, where samples are selected randomly after the population in the sampling frame made their own decisions to participate in a program or not (i.e., self-selected themselves to participate or not), one cannot rule out self-selection bias of the program participants in the estimations to be made using these data. Thus, we use Heckman's selection model to control for the selection bias problem. According to Heckman (1979), sample selection bias may arise in practice for two reasons: first, there may be self-selection by an individual or data units being investigated; second, sample selection decision by analysts or data processors is much the same fashion as self-selection. In this study due to the first reason, we are forced to use Heckman's two-stage model. Some adoption studies in Ethiopia and East Africa used the Heckman's selection model to identify the probability and intensity of different agricultural technologies in different locations (Atupokile, 2016;Jaleta et al., 2013;Yirga & Hassan, 2013).Heckman's selection model follows two step estimation procedure where in the first stage, an \"adoption equation\", attempts to capture factors affecting the adoption decision and Inverse Mill's Ratio (IMR) is obtained. In the second stage, the intensity of adoption is estimated using the IMR as one of the explanatory variables to correct for selection bias. The probability of adoption was estimated using Maximum Likelihood Probit model, from which the IMR was computed to control for selfselection bias into adoption. The specification for Heckman's two-step model is stated as follows:The adoption equation: The Probit model is specified as:where y � i is the latent dependent variable which is not observed and y i is a binary variable that assumes 1 if the i th household used chemical fertilizer, and 0 otherwise.β i is a vector of unknown parameters to be estimated in adoption equation, X i is a vector of explanatory variables in the probit regression model, and ε i is a random error term that is assumed to be independently and normally distributed with zero mean and constant variance. From the adoption equation, Lambda (λ i ), which is the conditional probability that an individual household decides to adopt (given a set of independent variables), is determined by the formula.where λ i is the Inverse Mill's Ratio (IMR), f(Xβ) is the standard normal probability density function and F(Xβ) is the cumulative distribution function for a standard normal random variable. Then, λ I is used in the outcome equation to account for the potential self-selection bias.Outcome model is specified as:where Y i is the intensity of fertilizer use,α i is a vector of unknown parameters to be estimated in the intensity of fertilizer use equation,Z i is a vector of explanatory variables determining the intensity of fertilizer use, μ is the parameter that helps to test whether there is a self-selection bias in the use of fertilizer,λ i is the IMR and η i is the error term.Before running the Heckman's model, all the hypothesized explanatory variables were checked for the existence of multicollinearity problem. There are two methods that are often suggested to test the existence of multicollinearity: Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) for association among the continuous explanatory variables and Contingency Coefficients (CC) for dummy variables. Following Maddala (1992) and Gujarati (1995), both VIF and CC were applied to the multicollinearity test and no problem was identified for the variables used in the model.The dependent variables in this study are \"inorganic fertilizer\" use, which is a dummy variable, and \"intensity of fertilizer\" use, which is a continuous variable. For the continuous dependent variable, the values potentially range between 0 and 200 kg/ha, i.e., the maximum recommended fertilizer use in maize production in the study area, 100 kg NPS (nitrogen (N) phosphorus (P) sulfur (S) fertilizer), and 100 kg Urea per ha. In this study, user/adopter is defined as smallholder maize producer who applied any amount of chemical fertilizer component in maize production during the survey period. Intensity of adoption refers to index indicating farmer's level/extent of fertilizer use in maize production at the period of the survey.Non-adopter is defined as a farmer who did not use any amount of inorganic fertilizer component in maize production during the survey period. For multiple practices, there are two options of measuring adoption; (i) adoption index: measures the extent of adoption at the time of the survey or (ii) adoption quotient: measures the degree or extent of use with reference without taking time into consideration. In this study, the first option was employed. Accordingly, adoption index which shows to what extent the respondent farmer has adopted the whole set of packages was calculated by employing the formula following:where e 1 is the extent of NPS use, e 2 is the extent of Urea use, p 1 and p 2 are the potential (recommended) doses of NPS and Urea, respectively.In the first stage of the Heckman's selection model, a dichotomous household level fertilizer use in maize production (1 for users and 0 for non-users) is used in estimating the probability of fertilizer adoption. In the second stage, household level intensity of fertilizer use in maize production is used as a dependent variable in the OLS regression.Depending on different literature on use and intensity of use of improved agricultural technologies, key explanatory variables that are expected to determine the use and intensity of fertilizer use in maize production at study area are summarized in Table 1.Following earlier studies assessed the profitability of technology use in cereal production (Gedefa, 2016;Takele, 2010)) we adopted net profit analysis method where all inputs and expenses required to produce the specific crop (in our case, maize) were considered and costs are estimated based on market prices. The unit of analysis is a hectare of crop land. Revenue from crop production is obtained using market prices and actual crop production data collected for each surveyed plot. Net profit is given as:Where TR and TC are total revenue and total cost per ha, respectively, P is farm-gate price of maize (Birr/kg), 1 Q is household level average maize productivity (kg/ha), w i and X i are the unit price and amount of input i used in maize production, respectively.The main constraints hindering the use and intensity of fertilizer use in maize production at the study area were identified and grouped into 12 categories through focus group discussion. Following farmers' ranking in terms of their importance as a challenge in intensifying maize production, the constraints were arranged from severe to mild constraint: high cost of fertilizer, lack of credit service, high interest rate on credit, low return on fertilizer use, lack of uniform rain fall distribution, perception of having fertile land, absence of choice packaging amount, inefficient distribution of fertilizer, distance of residence from fertilizer marketing, late arrival of fertilizer, poor quality of fertilizer, and lack of knowledge on fertilizer. This subsection used the Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W) in determining whether there is an agreement in the respondents' ranking of the constraints associated with the use and intensity of fertilizer use among the maize-growing smallholder farmers in the study area. Following Salaam (2016), the Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W) analysis is statistical technique that is used to rank a given set of identified constraints from the most critical to the least critical one and measures the degree of agreement between these constraints. The constraint with the least sum score or mean is ranked as the most critical while the one with the highest sum score or mean is ranked as the least critical. The formula for Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance was used to test the degree of agreement among smallholder maize farmers on the constraints identified. The formula is specified as follows:Where, W is Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance, T is the sum of ranks for constraints being ranked, m is the total number of respondents, n is the total number of constraints being ranked (Anang et al., 2011).H o : There is no significant agreement between the rankings of constraints of use and intensity of fertilizer use among smallholder maize farmers in the study area Figure 1. H 1 : There is asignificant agreement between the rankings of constraints of use and intensity of fertilizer use among smallholder maize farmers in the study area.Table 2 presents the results of descriptive statistics and compares the inorganic fertilizer users and non-users based on different factors. Accordingly, about 87.4% of the sample households were male headed. More than 67% and 54.5% of the male and female headed households, respectively, were chemical fertilizer users. The sample households on average utilized 82.8 kg/ha of NPS and 60.1 kg/ha of Urea in maize production. The result indicated that fertilizer application in maize production in falls below the recommended rate. The result of this study is in line with the findings of Ketema and Kebede (2017).The overall average age and education of the sample respondents were 44.5 and 1.6 years, respectively. There is no significant difference between the mean age of non-users (45.2 years) and users (44.1 years) whereas users were more educated than the non-users (i.e., 2.1 and 0.8 years of schooling, respectively). The average family size was 5.2 in adult equivalent, which is equal for users and non-users (Table 2).The average farm size and livestock holding of the respondents were 3.46 ha and 6.5 TLU (Tropical Livestock Unit) respectively. Users hold significantly larger farm size (3.64 ha) than nonusers (3.11 ha). Similarly, users hold large number of livestock (7.5TLU) than non-users (4.6TLU). The average annual farm and off-farm income were 7,907.3 and 1,280.6 Birrper household, respectively. The mean farm income was larger for users (10,130.7 Birr) than that of the nonusers (3,682.8 Birr). Likewise, the average off-farm income was also larger for users (1,894.58 Birr) than for the non-user (114.08 Birr). The average frequency of contacts with extension agents was 1.7 days per month during production season. Users contacted extension agents more frequently (2.05 days per month) than non-users who contacted extension agents for only 1.02 days per Source: Adopted from GIS month. On the average, a farmer walks 1.15 hours to reach the nearest market which is 1.1 hours for users and 1.23 hours for non-users with no statistically significant difference (Table 2).Ninety-five percent of the non-users and 72.8% of the users had perceived that the cost of maize production was high. The chi-square (χ 2 ) test indicated that there was statistically significant difference in perception on cost of maize production among fertilizer users and non-users at 1% level (Table 3).Table 3 shows that only 14.37% of the total respondents prepared and applied compost to their farmland. Slightly more proportion of non-users (18.33%) prepared and applied compost than the fertilizer users (12.3%), but the difference was not statistically significant. It is better if the users and non-users are prepared and apply compost in maize production. About 40% of the sample respondents were member of any form of cooperative. Only 35% of the non-users and 44.74% of users were members of a cooperative without any significant difference between the two categories. About 62.6% of the respondents did not use credit for agricultural production. Only 6.7% of the non-users and 46.6% the users used input credit. The chi-square (χ2) test shows statistically significant association between using input credit and using inorganic fertilizer at 1% level (Table 3).Table 4 presents the estimation results of the Hackman's selection model for the factors affecting household's inorganic fertilizer use in maize production. Results show that age of the household head was found to be positive and significantly (p < 0.093) influenced the probability of adopting fertilizer. The result indicates that, as the average age of the household head increases by one more year, the probability of using fertilizer in maize production increases by 0.5%. Older farmers might gain knowledge and experience of input use. Moreover, older farmers may accumulate more wealth than younger and so older ones may still be intensive fertilizer users even as they grow older. The result of this study was consistent with the findings by Beshir et al. (2012) and Debebe (2016).Education level of household head was found to be positively and significantly influencing the probability of fertilizer use in maize production at 1% (P < 0.000) level. The result indicated that the increase in the number of years of formal schooling of the household head by one more schooling year would lead to increase in the probability of fertilizer use in maize production by 4.01%. This implies that, education improves the ability to use information, process and interpret about agricultural technology. Our finding is consistent with the findings in Negera and Bashargo (2014).Livestock holding was found to be positively influencing (at 1% P < 0.005) the probability to use fertilizer. The result shows that, as livestock holding increases by a TLU, the probability that a farmer uses fertilizer in maize production increases by 2.6%. This implies that as the number of livestock increases smallholder farmers usually become more wealthy and able to purchase fertilizer. The study is consistent with the findings of Ketema and Bauer (2011) and Yirga and Hassan (2013). Farm income has positive and significant influence on the use of fertilizer in maize production. Accordingly, an increase in 1000 Birr of farm income leads to a 1% increase in the probability of fertilizer use in maize production. The result of the study implies that smallholder farmers who got income from their annual agricultural production could invest some proportion of the income to buy fertilizer as well as to purchase other agricultural inputs. The result of this study is consistent with findings of Ketema and Kebede (2017).Perception on cost of production had a negative and statistically significant, at 1% (P < 0.005) level, effect on households' use of fertilizer. The result implies that, the more the farmers perceive that cost of production is high, is the less likely they use fertilizer in maize production. The result of this study was consistent with the findings of Fufa and Hassan (2006).Frequency of contact with extension agents has a positive and statistically significant, at 1% (P < 0.006) level, influence on the likelihood of farmers' fertilizer use in maize production. The result revealed that, as frequency of household head's contact with extension agent increases by a day per month, the probability of using fertilizer in maize production increases by 4.4%. This result implies that contacting extension agents frequently could enhance farmers' exposure to new and improved technologies and practices in crop production, and also increases acquiring updated information on the agricultural technologies. A result in this study is consistent with finding of Derso et al. (2016).Use of input credit has a positive and statistically significant influence, at 5% (P < 0.014) level, on the probability of farmer's fertilizer use in maize production. The result indicated that famers who used input credit have higher probability of fertilizer use in maize production by 10.5%. The result implies that credit is key in relieving capital constraints faced by smallholder farmers. This result was consistent with the findings by Ketema and Bauer (2011) and Jaleta et al. (2013).The parameter estimates of Heckman's two-step models for intensity of fertilizer use in maize production are given in Table 5. Results show that six variables were found to be significant determinants of the intensity of fertilizer use by households in maize production.Inverse mill ratio: According to the model output, inverse mill ratio (Lambda) for the intensity of fertilizer use was significant, at 5% (P < 0.034) level, indicating that selection bias would have affected the intensity of fertilizer use had it been calculated without taking into account the decision to use fertilizer. Hence, this justifies the relevance of using Heckman's two-step procedure. The positive sign suggests that the error terms in the adoption equation and intensity of adoption are positively correlated. This shows that those unobserved factors that determine households' use of fertilizer in maize production are likely to be positively associated with household intensity of fertilizer use in maize production.Education level of household head: It had a positive and statistically significant, at 1% level (P < 0.000), effect on intensity of fertilizer use by households in maize production. The coefficient of variable shows that as the household head gets one more year of formal education, the intensity of fertilizer use in maize production increases by 4.94 kg, keeping other variables constant. This presumably arises from a better understanding of the usefulness of fertilizers and it may also imply better crop management. The result of this study is in harmony with the findings of Tedla (2011) and Yirga and Hassan (2013).Livestock holding: It had a positive and statistically significant, at 5% level (P < 0.017), influence on intensity of fertilizer use by households in maize production. The coefficient of the variable shows that as the household head's livestock holding increases by one TLU, the intensity of fertilizer use in maize production increases by 1.87 kg, keeping other variables constant. This implies that, households with larger livestock holding may have the opportunity to get financial ability by selling their livestock. The result of this study was consistent with the finding of Ketema and Kebede (2017).Perception on cost of production: It is shown that it has negative and statistically significant, at 1% level (P < 0.002), effect on intensity of fertilizer use in maize production. The negative relationship indicated that the more a household perceives the cost of production is high, the less amount of fertilizer it uses in maize production. This result is in line with the findings of Muthyalu (2013).Off-farm income: It has positive and statistically significant, at 5% level (P < 0.049), influence on intensity of fertilizer use in maize production. The coefficient of the variable indicated that as the average income a household earns from off-farm activities increases by 1Birr, the intensity of fertilizer use in maize production increases by 0.002 kg, keeping other variables constant. Cash generated from off-farm activities increase the farmers' liquidity to purchase yield enhancing agricultural technologies. The result is consistent with the findings in Beshir et al. (2012).Frequency of contact with extension agent: This variable has a positive and statistically significant, at 1% (P < 0.000) level, influence on the intensity of fertilizer use in maize production. The coefficient of the variable indicated that as the frequency of extension agent contact with the head of household increases by one more day per month the intensity of fertilizer use in maize production increases by 6.5 kg, keeping other variables constant. The result implies that frequency of contact with extension agent for technical advice and information enhances the intensity of fertilizer use in maize production. The result of the study is in line with the finding by Yirga and Hassan (2013).Table 6 presents the results of Gross income from maize production, cost of maize production, and net profit from using inorganic fertilizer. The result shows that the average maize yield for fertilizer users was 2.9 ton/ha and the average gross income generated by these farmers was 14,471.87 Birr/ha. This average maize productivity is below the national average for the same year, i.e., 3.66 ton/ha (CSA, 2016/2017). The results also indicated that the average total cost per hectare used for maize production was 12,254.92 Birr/ha. Labor cost (wage value of labor) accounts for the highest share of the total cost (34.3%) followed by material input cost (22%) and animal draft power cost (17.2%). Opportunity cost of land takes the least share (12.1%) of the total cost and other costs account for 14.4% of the total cost of production. The finding reveals that the total revenue earned by the sample respondents who use inorganic fertilizer in maize production was 14,471.87 Birr/ha whereas their total cost incurred for maize production was 12,254.92 Birr/ha. Therefore, after covering all the costs incurred in maize production, the average net profit of inorganic fertilizer use was 2,216.95Birr/ha. This result implies that the use of fertilizer in maize production in study area was profitable. In the study area, even though the existing maize productivity and price level makes the use of fertilizer in maize production profitable, the net profit obtained by sampled producers was low.On the other hand, Figure 2 gives the Kernel density estimates of the distribution of inorganic fertilizer user respondents by their respective profit per ha of maize produced. The figures indicate that most of the user respondents were profitable and distributed at the profit area and some farmers were more profitable from fertilizer use in maize production. This might be due to high productivity achieved by those farmers relative to others. Although farmers on average make positive profit, fertilizer use is not always reflecting a profit as some considerable farmers are still making some loss in maize production. Therefore, the low or negative profit arises due to improper use of inputs like fertilizer and improved seed, poor agronomic practice, and low price of maize grain.In Table 6, the average maize productivity without using fertilizer was 1.2ton/ha and the average gross income generated from this was 5,967.78 Birr/ha. This shows that low productivity of maize without fertilizer use implies a negative profit (−3,807.78Birr/ha).Table 7 presents the result of the Kendall's coefficient of concordance, which was 0.680 (68%). Hence, the result shows that the respondents were in agreement with each other on the ranking of the constraints in the study area. Thus, we rejected the null hypothesis (H o ), which states that there was no agreement among the respondents over the ranking of the constraints of use and intensity of fertilizer use. Hence, H 1 was accepted and there was agreement among the respondents on the ranking of the constraints. Therefore, the main constraints put into the following orders based on the identification and rankings by the sampled respondents.High cost of fertilizer was ranked at first and found to be the most important constraint to use and intensity fertilizer use in maize production followed by lack of credit, high interest rate on credit, lack of return on fertilizer use, lack of uniform rainfall distribution, perception of having fertile land, absence of choice of packaging amount; inefficient fertilizer distribution, distance of fertilizer marketing from residence, late arrival of fertilizer, poor quality of fertilizer and lack of knowledge on fertilizer application in order of importance (ranked from second to twelfth).Use of inorganic fertilizer is essential in cereal-based systems to enhance agricultural production and productivity. This study analyzed determinants of fertilizer use and its profitability in maize production using data collected from a total of 174 farmers randomly selected from NonoBenja district. Results revealed that farmers who used inorganic fertilizer applied 142.8 kg/ha, on average, which is far below the recommended rate (200 kg/ha). Results also showed that age and education of the household head, farm income, livestock holding, frequency of contact with extension agent, use of input credit and perception on fertilizer cost were found to be significantly determining the use of fertilizer while variation in education level of household head, livestock holding, frequency of contact with extension agents, perception on cost and off-farm income were found to significantly influencing the intensity of fertilizer use in maize production. Net profit analysis indicated that fertilizer users made a positive profit, 2,217 Birr/ha, after covering all costs incurred in maize production. It can be concluded that inorganic fertilizer use increases the profitability of maize production in the study area. However, given that high cost of fertilizer and factors hindering farmers' access to inorganic fertilizer are raised as the main constraints for inorganic fertilizer use. Thus, it is important to design a mechanism that eases farmers' access to inorganic fertilizer in the study area. The extent of inorganic fertilizer use in maize production is still lagging behind the due to different factors recommended rates. Therefore, farmers should be encouraged to use fertilizer and intensify their use in order to enhance crop productivity and protect soil fertility lose. Also, the farmer should have to give more emphasis on the use organic fertilizers. Furthermore, the study revealed the importance agricultural extension services in advising and distributing fertilizers to farmers in various maize producing districts. This can further maximize the benefit obtained from the application of inorganic fertilizer. Furthermore, it is recommended to strengthen farmers' training centers to enable them to properly demonstrate technologies and at the same time to capacitate farmers on technology utilization through trainings."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0740143657.json b/main/part_2/0740143657.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43c365a7bda736149f49f64dc3f70bfacbc395a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0740143657.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f6b598861945016be7ab2ffcc09a471d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e163d0b2-a835-4357-97e3-99426ab7070a/retrieve","id":"-1006930360"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c4ae966f-4f3a-4a55-8713-513555221dcb","content":"This Labor Management Procedures (LMP) has been developed by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) to guide mitigation and response to project risks relating to working conditions and occupational health and safety (OHS) of workers and community members during the implementation of the Accelerating Impact of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA) project activities in Zambia.The environmental and social screening conducted on AICCRA project activities in Zambia identified some potential risks on labor working conditions and occupational health and safety (OHS). Therefore, this LMP is a guiding instrument for IWMI and all other grant partners implementing activities on AICCRA Zambia.Based on this LMP, individual grant partners may be required to prepare separate labor management plans proportionate to the labor related risks on their project activities. This LMP also sets the basis for providing clear understanding to grantees and project workers on AICCRA Senegal of what is required on any specific labor issue.The implementing partners on AICCRA Zambia include the Alliance Bioversity-CIAT (ABC), the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), the International Research Institute (IRI), the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), WorldFish, the Zambia Metrological Department (ZMD), and the International Water Management Institute (IWMI).The purpose of this LMP is to facilitate the identification of different types of workers that are likely to be involved in the project and set out the ways in which those workers will be managed in accordance with the requirements of Zambia labor laws and the objectives of the World Bank Environmental and Social Standard 2: Labor and Working Conditions (ESS2).The LMP will also provide a methodical and coherent approach to dealing with the labor-related issues, impacts and risks likely to emanate from the implementation of this project. And at the same time, facilitating the identification of diverse types of project workers likely to be involved in the project.Consistent with ESS2, this LMP seeks to:• Promote safety and health at work.• Promote the fair treatment, non-discrimination and equal opportunity of project workers.• Protect project workers, including vulnerable workers such as women, persons with disabilities, children (of working age, in accordance with this ESS) and migrant workers, contracted workers, community workers and primary supply workers, as appropriate. • Prevent the use of all forms of forced labor and child labor.• Support the principles of freedom of association and collective bargaining of project workers in a manner consistent with national law. • Provide project workers with accessible means to raise workplace concerns.It is important to note that this LMP is a living document and would be updated as and when the scope of work for AICCRA Zambia and its related labor requirements change.The AICCRA project is a World Bank supported project that seeks to strengthen the technical, institutional, and human capacity needed to enhance transfer of climate-relevant information, decision-making tools, and technologies in support of scaling efforts in International Development Association (IDA) eligible countries in Africa. It supports critical knowledge creation and sharing, and capacity building activities to enable regional and national-level stakeholders to take Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) innovations to scale. It will achieve this by further strengthening partnerships between CGIAR and regional and local research institutes, universities, civil society organizations, farmer organizations, and private sector. AICCRA will facilitate the development of Climate Information Services (CIS) and promote the adoption of bundle CIS and CSA solutions across sub-regions within Africa that are extremely vulnerable to climate change. The project will also support on-the-ground activities in selected countries in Western, Eastern and Southern Africa where CGIAR science has the greatest chance of success in delivering catalytic results, which can be adopted by other countries in the region through spillover effects, and regional engagement.The Project Development Objective is to strengthen the technical, institutional, and human capacity needed to enhance transfer of climate-relevant information, decision-making tools, and technologies in support of scaling efforts in IDA-eligible countries in Africa. Based on this overall objective the project is structured into four components:Component 1 -Knowledge generation and sharing: Supporting generation and sharing of knowledge products and tools designed to address critical gaps in the design and provision of agricultural climate services, enable climate-informed investment planning, and contribute to the design of policies to promote uptake of CSA and CIS at the regional, sub-regional and national levels.Component 2 -Strengthen partnership for delivery: Strengthening the capacities of key regional and national institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa along the research-to-development continuum for anticipating climate change effects and accelerating identification, prioritization, and uptake of best-bet adaptive, and mitigation measures.Component 3 -Validating Climate-Smart Agriculture Innovations through Piloting: Supporting testing, validation, and equitable scaling (including gender and social inclusion) of CSA and CIS technologies in research stations and in farmers' fields; linking of validated bundled CSA and CIS packages to technology transfer systems; and improving their access by farmers and other value chain actors to climate-informed agricultural advisory services to inform decision-making about choice of technology and enterprise management.Component 4 -Project management: Supporting day to day implementation, coordination, supervision and overall communication and management (including, procurement, environmental and social risk management, financial management, monitoring and evaluation, auditing and reporting) of Project activities and results, all through the provision of goods, consulting services, non-consulting services, training and workshops, operating costs, and payment of staff salaries for the purpose.The AICCRA-Zambia team develops services and innovations to help Zambian farmers and communities safeguard their livelihoods in the face of climate change.In Zambia, climate change is threatening existing crop and livestock systems, impacting agriculture businesses, and undermining livelihoods. It is increasingly urgent for Zambian farmers and livestock keepers to be able to anticipate climate-related events and take appropriate preventative actions.AICCRA-Zambia aims to improve water, food and energy security through access to knowledge, technologies, and decision-making tools, to strengthen climate resilience in Zambia's agriculture and food systems in the face of a hotter and drier climate. AICCRA-Zambia works with Zambian partners by scaling actionable Climate Information Services (CIS) and Climate-smart Agriculture (CSA) technologies such as sustainable financing for off-grid solar irrigation; integrated aquaculture-agriculture systems; addressing drought through climate smart seed varieties; and diversified chicken/goats-legume systems, all of which are meant to promote gender and social inclusion.The project aims to strengthen local capacity by training intermediaries to communicate climate services; as well as by implementing a local internship program; providing accelerator grants for SMEs/entrepreneurs; and assessing challenges in the enabling environment for startups. It also seeks to inform policy and enhance investment plans by identifying suitable financing mechanisms, using fiscal tools to de-risk private sector investments in food value chains.The key activities of the cluster are cited below: The Project workers as it relates to the applicability of the ESS2 refers to workers who will be employed or engaged under the project, whether as a full-time, part-time, temporary, seasonal or as a migrant worker. The ESS2 categorizes project workers into four broad categories: a. Direct Workers: People employed or engaged directly by the Borrower (in this case Alliance Bioversity-CIAT) to work specifically in relation to the project. b. Contracted Workers: People employed or engaged by contractors (in this case workers of grant partners) to perform work related to core activities of the project, regardless of location. c. Primary Supply Workers. People employed or engaged by the project's primary suppliers 1 of goods and materials for core project activities. d. Community Workers: People employed or engaged in providing community labor 2 .The AICCRA Zambia project will engage both direct workers and contracted workers but will not engage the services of primary suppliers or community workers.The national and international staff of the Alliance Bioversity-CIAT (ABC) assigned to implement certain project activities under the AICCRA Zambia project will be regarded as direct workers. This is because, ABC is the lead client and overall coordinator of AICCRA project activities. ABC staff on AICCRA Zambia will remain subject to the terms and conditions of their existing employment contracts, which are governed by ABC polices. ABC has prepared and disclosed a separate LMP for the management of its staff. The project may occasionally engage consultants to undertake key research and evaluation studies and prepare other essential dissemination documents in the second and third year of project implementation. Terms and conditions of these consultants will be guided by national labor legislations, and this LMP.Government Civil Servants: ZMD and ZARI are government institutions and the staff assigned to work on AICCRA activities are all government civil servants. The staff of these grant partners will remain subject to the terms and conditions of their existing public and private sector employment, which are governed by the Constitution of the Republic of Zambia, the Employment Code Act No. 3 of 2019, and other labor laws.There will be no legal transfer of their employment or engagement to the Project. Nonetheless, these sub-grantees are required by the terms of their contract to implement project activities in accordance with the occupational health and safety measures contained in this LMP and prohibitions placed on forced and child labor as well as measures on SEA/SH.The scope of AICCRA Zambia project does not provide for engagement of security forces and migrant workers. In compliance with national laws, persons under 18 years will not be permitted to work on the project as key project activities may exceed their capacity. The project will have no community workers as defined under ESS2. The use of migrant and seasonal workers is not expected under the AICCRA Zambia project. Unskilled farm labor that may be required to clear weeds at the demonstration sites will be recruited from nearby host communities. These unskilled laborers will be engaged and managed as contracted workers. They will be contracted through short-term contractual arrangements consistent with the requirements of Zambian Labor Laws and World Bank ESS-2. A contract with code of conduct will be issued to such workers.Female Workers. Currently 21 out of 40 staff members are female, representing 52.5% of existing workers on AICCRA Zambia. Despite this good balance, more priority will be given to women during recruitment of consultants and new workers to fill vacant positions on the project. This will be done with the overall aim of seeking to promote qualified women entry and advancement in agriculture.Further details on contracted workers engaged to work on AICCRA Zambia are provided below.13 Key direct and contracted workers required for the implementation of AICCRA Zambia activities have been engaged. These workers will continue to work on the project activities through implementation up to closure. Unskilled laborers that may be needed on the project will be engaged in the project second year and the numbers to be engaged will depend on the number of demonstration sites to be set up. In addition, the project may occasionally engage consultants to undertake key research and evaluation studies and prepare other essential dissemination documents in the second and third year of project implementation.This section provides assessment of key labor and OHS related risks and the extent to which they relate to the AICCRA Zambia activities. In summary, the key labor risks for this intervention include: There are concerns that workers may be subjected to poor working conditions including lack of PPE when working on demonstration sites, which could result in eye injuries from pesticides use, sand or rock particles, leg injuries from reptile bites and other hazardous on-farm conditions. Partners that will operate CSA demonstration sites will be required to procure and provide PPE for all workers and visiting farmers to safeguard against injuries.The use of pesticides is foreseen as very limited possibility and would be part of the Integrated Pest Management Plan. Decisions on the quantity, timing and mode of fertilizer application will be made to achieve high fertilizer use efficiency, and limited loss in the forms of nitrate, nitrite and nitrous oxide emission at each site.Blanket fertilizer recommendations will be avoided. The intended use of both pesticides and fertilizers on demonstration sites could cause both occupational exposure of workers and nonoccupational exposure of nearby residents to the harmful effects of these chemicals. Poor disposal of pesticide residues and containers could also contaminate the soil and water bodies. The neighboring populations may also be exposed to phytosanitary products due to the drift of products sprayed with the wind, and to non-compliance with safety deadlines in chemical applications before harvesting of food crops. The use of chemicals on AICCRA Zambia would be part of an integrated pest management plan that will be outlined in an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) to be prepared. The pest management plan will focus on options other than pesticide applications, and only use synthetic chemical pesticides as a last resort. Managing these risks also requires adequate training for farm workers. Therefore, adequate training in pesticide storage and safe use will be provided to all farmer workers to reduce the risk of accidental exposure and wrongful disposure.The violation of workers' rights could occur through inadequate compensation of consultants and contracted workers to be engaged, requirement for direct and contracted staff to work for long working hours and denial of holidays or leave requests. Through pre-contractual due diligence, the project will ensure that staff of all partners working on AICCRA Zambia have working conditions and rights consistent with Zambian labor laws.Likely causes for labor disputes could include labor wages rates and delays of payment; disagreement over working conditions; and health and safety concerns in the work environment. Invariably employers may retaliate against workers for demanding legitimate working conditions, or raising concerns regarding unsafe or unhealthy work situations, or any grievances raised, which could further lead to labor unrest.6. Forced and Child Labor: Forced and child labor risk is unlikely as the project is required to work only with institutions without risks of forced and child labor. The AICCRA project maintains strict prohibitions on forced and child labor. Under the AICCRA project, all grant partners are screened to establish that they have no historical practices on forced and child labor before contracts are signed with them.There are concerns of vulnerable female staff of grant partners being harassed by their supervisors and colleagues. Other abuse may also be experienced by female farmers that would be selected to participate in knowledge transfer sessions of the project. Project workers could ask for sexual favors from women farmers before allowing them to be included in studies at the CSA demonstrations. Project staff that are visiting farming communities may also demand for sex from community members in exchange for money.It is also likely that separate latrine, and other sanitation facilities for both men and women may not be provided at the demonstration sites, which could lead to violation of sexual privacy. There could also be the absence of specific grievance mechanism for females to share their concern about the working environment including concerns on SEA/SH.Mitigating SEA/SH at work spaces of AICCRA Zambia is critical for all partners. IWMI will coordinate to ensure strict compliance with all SEA/SH mitigation measures contained in the overall project action plan on SEA/SH mitigation and response. In so doing, the project will conduct sensitization on SEA/SH and require workers to sign a code of conduct with key prohibitions on SEA/SH. Safe and confidential grievance channels easily accessible to all stakeholders will also be provided for all project stakeholders.Multiple levels of interactions between project staff, farmers, and other stakeholders during project events could increase the risk of COVID-19 transmissions. To mitigate these risks, workers will attend awareness raising sessions, be provided with relevant PPE, and be required to enforce and maintain adequate distances and use masks during meetings, training sessions, and other project activities. The Part III of Zambia's Constitution covers \"Protection of fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual\". Article 11 recognizes equality regardless of gender, skin color, creed or belief, political party, origin, and race. It also recognizes the freedom of assembly, association, expression, etc., and takes into account the rights of children and protection from expropriation. Article 14 states that \"1. No person shall be held in slavery or servitude; 2. No person shall be required to perform forced labor.\" Article 15 covers protection from inhuman treatment. Cruel treatment and torture are prohibited in Zambia. Article 21 gives provisions about the protection of freedom of assembly and association. Section 1 states that \"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of assembly and association, that is to say, his right to assemble freely and associate with other persons and in particular to form or belong to any political party, trade union or other association for the protection of his interests.\"The Article 23 (2) states that \"no person shall be treated in a discriminatory manner by any person acting by virtue of any written law or in the performance of the functions of any public office or any public authority.(3) In this Article the expression \"discriminatory\" mean, affording different treatment to different persons attributable, wholly or mainly to their respective descriptions by race, tribe, sex, place of origin, marital status, political opinions color or creed whereby persons of one such description are subjected to disabilities or restrictions to which persons of another such description are not made subject or are accorded privileges or advantages which are not accorded to persons of another such description.The Article 24 is about Protection of Young Persons from Exploitation. The section 1 prohibits employment of young person (under the age of fifteen years) in any occupation or employment which would prejudice his health or education or interfere with his physical, mental, or moral development. Section 2 and 3 give protection for young persons against physical or mental ill-treatment, all forms of neglect, cruelty or exploitation and traffic in any form.Further, Article 261 states that \"A person holding a public office shall act in accordance with a code of conduct and ethics, as prescribed for that office.\"The Employment Code, under the provisions of section 22(1), makes it mandatory for a contract of employment whose duration is for a period of six months or more to be in writing. However, oral contracts are recognized by section 18 of the Employment Code Act.With respect to employees under an oral contract of employment, the employer has a mandate to ensure that a record of the contract of employment is prepared and maintained. This is provided for under section 18 of the Employment Code Act. Section 21(1), states that an oral contract for a period of one month will be deemed to have been extended for a further period of one-month subject to the same terms and conditions.The Employment Code provides that where an employer does not notify the employee in writing of the confirmation, it will be presumed that the employee has been confirmed in the position from the date of the expiry of the probation period.Young children (a person under the age of fifteen years) and young persons ( a person who has attained the age of fifteen years, but is below the age of nineteen years) are protected under the Employment Code Act in the following ways:I.Employers are prohibited from employing a child in a public or private industrial undertaking or any branch of the industrial undertaking. II.Employers are prohibited from employing a young child or young person in work which by nature constitutes a \"worst form\" of labor.Employers are prohibited from employing a young person to work at night in an industrial undertaking.The section 8 of Part I of the Employment Code states that a person shall not engage or subject another person to perform forced labor.Section 66 of Part IV relates to \"protection of wages\" it stipulates that an employer shall pay the wages of an employee (f) in accordance with the terms of the contract of employment. The wages of an employee shall fall due and be paid at regular intervals not being later than the fifth day following the date on which they fall due under subsection (1). ( 4) An employer shall on the termination of a contract of employment, pay an employee all wages additional to basic pay including overtime pay and allowances on the date of termination of the contract of employment. Methods of payment of wages are specified in the section 67.(1) \"An employer shall pay an employee the wages in the currency of the Republic, except that where an employee so requests, in writing, or if the provisions of any collective agreement or conditions of service applicable to the employee.\" Article 68 -69 show provisions for authorized and unauthorized deductions.The Employment Code Act, under the provisions of section 41, provides for 14 weeks' maternity leave. In the event of a multiple birth, the maternity leave will be extended for a further period of four weeks.A female employee who remains in employment with the same employer for a period of 24 months preceding the beginning of the leave is entitled to full pay where the maternity benefits are not payable under the contract.The provisions of section 41(4) of the Employment Code Act states that where a female employee has more than one employer or third-party scheme from which the employee is entitled to claim maternity benefits, an employer who pays the maternity benefit is entitled to recover from the other employer or third-party scheme, as a civil debt:a. in the case of another employer, a contribution which shall bear a proportion to the amount of the maternity benefit paid to the employee as the number of days the employee worked for the other employer; or b. in the case of a third-party scheme, the reimbursement of the maternity benefit as may be prescribed.On expiry of the maternity leave, the female employee is entitled to return to the job she had held before the maternity leave, or to a reasonably suitable job with terms and conditions not less favorable than those which had applied to her before the maternity leave. This is provided for under section 41(7) of the Employment Code Act.Notwithstanding having taken her maternity leave, the female employee is entitled to annual leave as stipulated under section 41(10) of the Employment Code Act.Further, the female employee nursing her un-weaned child is entitled, each working day, to two nursing breaks of 30 minutes each, or one nursing break for an hour. It is imperative to state that the nursing break period shall be six months from the date of delivery, and the said break will not be deducted from the number of paid hours of the female employee.Paternity leave is available to an employee who remains in continuous employment with the same employer for a period of 12 months and such leave shall be for at least five continuous working days. The leave should be taken within seven days of the birth of a child and a birth record of the child should be submitted to the employer. This is provided for under section 46 of the Employment Code Act.Section 40(1) of the Employment Code Act allows an employee who has worked for a period of six months or more to be entitled to leave of absence, referred to as family responsibility leave, with pay for a period not exceeding seven days in a calendar year to nurse a sick spouse, child or a dependent. An employer, before granting this leave, may require the employee to produce a certificate from a medical doctor certifying that the spouse, child or dependent is sick and requires special attention.Section (1) of Article 74 of Employment Code relates to hours of work. It stipulates that \"the normal days' work of a full-time employee (a) shall consist of eight hours of actual work; and (b) may begin on any day of the week, including a public holiday, where that employee works on a public holiday\". (2) An employer and an employee, other than a part-time employee, may agree that the employee works in excess of the stipulated hours without added remuneration if the number of hours covered in a week does not exceed forty-eight hours or a lesser number of hours that may be specified in a contract of employment or collective agreement.Weekly rests are taken into account in Article 76. Section (1) stipulates \"An employee is entitled to a rest day of at least twenty-four consecutive hours in every period of seven consecutive days\". According to section (2), the weekly rest day under section (1) shall be any day in respect of which the employee is not required to work under the employee's contract of employment. Subject to agreement, an employer shall grant to the employee on each working day meal and health breaks.Under section 36 of the Employment Act, employees have a minimum of 24 annual leave days, which is paid. Consequently, employees put on annual leave will receive full pay during this period. Similarly, other benefits under contract, and law, continue to accrue.Section 37 of the Employment Code provides for the formula to be used when computing Annual Leave benefits. Similar to the non-applicability of section 36, section 37 provides for the computation of how annual leave is to be paid but this is not enforceable as employers are exempt from paying the same to their employees.Section 75 of the Employment Code provides for the manner in which an employer is expected to pay their employees overtime. Subsection (1) stipulates that \"an employer shall pay an employee who works in excess of forty-eight hours in a week, one and half times the employee's hourly rate of pay\".Part IX of the Zambian Employment Code relates to \"Disputes and Breaches of contract\". Section (1) of Article 121 gives the conditions under which an aggrieved party may report a matter to an authorised officer. It may include:a) an employer or employee neglects or refuses to comply with the terms of any contract of employment; b) any question, difference or dispute arises as to the rights or liabilities of a party to the contract or as to any misconduct, neglect or ill treatment of the party; c) an injury to a person, or damage to property of the party occurs; or d) an allegation of discrimination under section 5 is made by an employee or prospective employee.Employees belonging to a trade union may first take their complaint against the employer through a trade union representing them to an organization representing employers, in the hope of settling the claims amicably.Section 108(2) of the Industrial and Labor Relations Act permits the employee to file a complaint within 30 days of the event which led to the discrimination before the High Court under the Industrial Relations Division.The section 108(2) provides for an extension of the 30-day period for a further three months, in order to allow the employee to exhaust all administration channels available.Employers are at liberty to settle claims at any time before trial. The courts encourage the parties to settle the matter amicably through its mediation rules incorporated in its procedure rules.Section 121(2) relates that \"An authorized officer shall e) take steps that the authorized officer may consider to be expedient to effect a settlement between the parties and, in particular, shall encourage the use of collective bargaining facilities, where applicable; and f) where an authorized officer fails to effect a settlement between the parties, the authorised officer may recommend that the aggrieved party refers the matter to court\".Section 52(4) An employer shall not terminate a contract of employment of an employee based on reasons relating to (a) union membership or participation in union activities outside working hours or, with the consent of the employer, within working hours.According to the provisions of section 53(1) of the Employment Code, an employee whose contract of employment is intended to be terminated is entitled to a period of notice or compensation in lieu of notice where the employee is not guilty of misconduct or any act which would trigger the employment relationship to terminate. Furthermore, the Employment Code Act provides for default notice periods where the contract of employment does not provide for the same.However, while section 53(1) permits the employer to terminate the contract with compensation in lieu of notice, section 52 of the Employment Code Act restrains and prohibits an employer from invoking a termination clause without giving valid reasons and section 52(1) of the Employment Code Act provides as follows: \"(1). A contract of employment terminates in the manner stated in the contract of employment or in any other manner in which a contract of employment is deemed to terminate under this Act or any other law, except that where an employer terminates the contract, the employer shall give reasons to the employee for the termination of the employee's contract of employment.\"Discrimination may be said to be unlawful where an employer discriminates against a female employee on the grounds of her gender or marital status by denying her access to opportunities for promotion, training or any other benefits or facilities, or where the recruitment policies only privilege men despite their unsuccessful applications and interviews.Article 23(3) of the Constitution of Zambia, Chapter 1, Volume 1 of the Laws of Zambia defines Discrimination as follows: \"Discrimination' means affording different treatment to different persons attributable, wholly or mainly, to their respective descriptions by race, tribe, sex, place of origin, marital status, political opinions, color or creed whereby persons of one such description are not made subject or are accorded privilege or advantages, which are not accorded to persons of another such description.\"Section 5 of the Employment Code places an obligation on the employer to promote equal opportunity in employment and eliminate discrimination in an undertaking.Further, section 108(1) of the Industrial and Labor Relations Act prohibits an employer from terminating the services of an employee or imposing a penalty or disadvantage on an employee on the basis of race, sex, marital status, religion, political opinion, affiliation, tribal extraction or status.The following are the grounds upon which discrimination is prohibited:a. grounds of color, nationality, tribe or place of origin, language, race, social origin, religion, belief, conscience, political or other opinion, sex, gender, pregnancy, marital status, ethnicity, family responsibility, disability, status, health, culture, economic status; and b. discrimination in respect of recruitment, training, promotion, terms and conditions of employment, termination of employment or other matters arising out of employment.Part VII of the Employment Code is about Employee Welfare. It is the duty of an employer to ensure that every worker employed by him or her works under satisfactory, safe and healthy conditions. The compulsory of the employer are:a. to provide an adequate supply of water and sanitation facilities at the undertaking. b. to provide an employee with medical attention and medicines and where necessary, transport to a health facility during the illness of the employee. c. to ensure that there exists in the undertaking an employment policy, procedure and code, including an HIV and AIDS policy, a health and wellness policy, harassment policy, performance management policy, grievance procedure and code of conduct.It is the obligation of every worker to use the safety appliances, and personal protective equipment provided by the employer in compliance with the employer's instructions. The employer is not kept responsible in case the injury is caused solely by non-compliance by the worker of protection measures.The World Bank recently approved an Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) which consists of ten standards and are aimed at preventing and mitigating undue harm to people and their environment in any development projects involving the Bank. The relevant standard of this framework to the LMP is ESS-2 Labor and Working Conditions.The World Bank through the ESS2 promotes the fair treatment, non-discrimination, and provision of equal opportunities for workers engaged on projects it supports. It strongly encourages protection of all project workers, including vulnerable groups such as women, persons with disabilities, children (of working age) and migrant workers, contracted workers, and primary supply workers, as appropriate. It sets out certain requirements that the project must meet in terms of working conditions, protection of the work force (especially the prevention of all forms of forced and child labor), and provision of a grievance mechanism that addresses concerns on the project promptly and uses a transparent process that provides timely feedback to those concerned. It requires borrowers to:• Develop and implement written labor management procedures applicable to the project.• Provide workers with information and documentation clear and understandable regarding their terms and conditions of employment.• Provide fair treatment, non-discrimination and equal opportunity to workers. Decisions relating to the employment or treatment of project workers should not be made on the basis of personal characteristics unrelated to inherent job requirements.• Protect the work force by defining the minimum age for employment and prohibiting forced labor.• Provide an efficient Grievance Mechanism for all direct workers and contracted workers (and, where relevant, their organizations) to raise workplace concerns.Conduct risk assessment to understand the likelihood and magnitude of OHS risks associated with project based on: whether the project will involve hazardous materials or processes; the potential consequences to workers, communities, or the environment if hazards are not adequately managed, which may depend on the proximity of project activities to people or to the environmental resources on which they depend.The table below shows comparison of the Zambia Employment Code and its implementing texts with key elements of the ESS2. The AICCRA project will applied provision on the Employment Code.The Zambian Constitution and Employment Code affords all persons the right to freedom of association, which includes freedom to form or join trade unions or other associations.ESS 2 makes provision for borrowers to legally establish workers' organizations and legitimate workers' representatives.Both give workers the right to freedom of association.The AICCRA project will applied provision on the Zambian Employment Code.The institutions working on AICCRA project shall recognize and respect the right of employees to freedom of association and collective bargaining.The Zambian Employment Code contains provisions that allow workers to resolve disputes in the event of disagreement between employer and employee through conciliation procedures or Labor Courts.ESS2 recognizes that a sound grievance mechanism shouldbe provided for all direct workers and contracted workers to raise workplace concerns.ESS2 includes more provisions on GM AICCRA project will elaborate, implement and disclose a GM in accordance with provisions in ESS2. Implementing partners will be required to induct their employees on the grievance procedure.Zambian laws EES2 requirements Identified gaps Action required raised and progress on resolution.The Zambian Employment Code generally precludes employers from deducting any amount from the remuneration of their employees except in some cases defined in the Code.ESS2 gives provisions for payment deductions in line with national law or the labor management procedures.EES2 refers to national law for salary deduction AICCRA Zambia project will follow provisions in the Employment Code to make salary deductions.This section identifies the people who, within the project, that are responsible for certain activities including the recruitment and management of agents and contractors, occupational health and safety, and handling of grievances.This LMP will be operationalized by IWMI through the leadership of AICCRA Cluster Lead for Zambia with assistance from the Safeguard Focal Person for the AICCRA Zambia Cluster. The AICCRA Senior Safeguard Specialists will provide additional oversight to ensure the application of this LMP to mitigate and respond to issues on occupational health and safety. Detail level of oversight and responsibility are provided in the table below. IWMI and all AICCRA Zambia partners are committed to managing project activities in a manner that safeguards the welfare, health, and safety of their employees, and consultants. In accepting this responsibility, the centers are committed to following the policies and procedures outlined under this section to avoid, mitigate, and respond to the potential labor and OHS related risks identified under section 3.0.• All implementing partners will maintain fair terms and conditions guided by the Zambian Employment Code for all employees and consultants working on the AICCRA project. • Decisions relating to the employment or treatment of project workers will be made in accordance with the requirements of the job. The recruitment of project workers will be based on the principle of equal opportunities and fair treatment, and there will be no discrimination in recruitment and hiring, remuneration (including wages and benefits), working and employment conditions, access to training, assignment of a position, promotion, termination or retirement, or disciplinary practices. However, because women representation on AICCRA project is low and the project seeks to promote women entry and advancement in agriculture more priority will be given to women during consultants and new workers to fill vacant positions on the project.• The contractor will be also required to comply with the national Labor law on gender equality in the work place, which will include provision of maternity leave and nursing breaks and sufficient and suitable toilet and washing facilities, separate from men and women workers.• To avoid labor disputes, fair terms and conditions will be applied for project workers in under AICCRA Zambia.• The project will respect the workers' right of labor unions and freedom of association, as set out in the Labor code. • The project will maintain a grievance mechanism for all project workers to promptly address their workplace grievances. Further details are provided in Section 11.0• Forced labor will not be permitted on the AICCRA project, this is strictly prohibited by the Zambian Employment code, the project Environmental and Social Risk Management (ESRM) guide and the World Bank ESS2.• For the reference of partners, this may also include excessive limitations of freedom of movement, imposition of recruitment or employment fees payable at the commencement of employment, loss or delay of wages that impede the workers' right to end employment within their legal rights, substantial or inappropriate fines, physical punishment, use of security or other personnel to force or extract work from project workers, or other restrictions that compel a project worker to work in a non-voluntary basis.Unannounced visits by AICCRA's E&S Safeguard Team and relevant technical services will effectively identify cases of forced labor and refer such cases to the criminal justice system. A review of lessons learned from the experiences of CIAT projects and its implementing partners in Zambia highlights the absence of forced labor. However, a specific monitoring procedure will be put in place by the AICCRA Zambia cluster in close collaboration with the ministry in charge of labor and the interested parties.All project implementing partners under the AICCRA project will be required to:• Comply with national legislation on occupational health and safety • Communicate these policy statements and procedures to all workers working under the AICCRA Zambia Cluster. • Provide OH&S training and enable workers' attendance of such training • Regularly screen all project sites to identify potential hazards and set out measures to eliminate them. • Procure and provide relevant PPEs for staff working on demonstration sites, visiting farmers and other stakeholders as and when needed. This will include farm safety boots, protective googles, hand gloves, air purifying disposable/washable masks, neoprene gloves, chemical resistant hats, and coveralls. • Ensure proper storage and disposal of pesticides as instructed on the product label and recommended actions in the pest management plan to be prepared. • Ensure availability of emergency first aid box at demonstration sites and provide a card that displays an emergency numbers. • Document all occupational accidents and incidents and report severe and serious (as per WorldBank incident classification at Annex 2) incidents to the World Bank through the AICCRA Senior E&S Specialist with 48 hours after the occurrence of such major accidents and provide a full detail report within three weeks. Conduct root cause analysis to inform corrective actions required. • Maintain effective collaborations with CGIAR Centers, sub grantees and employees to investigate cause of accidents at workplace. Relevant information should be gathered and provided in written format with incident investigation form provided at Annex 3 and subsequent details report produced with the aid of the outline provided at Annex 4. • Inspect all farm equipment with the view of ascertain it safety status before use.• Provide workers and visiting farmers with access to toilets and potable drinking water • Properly dispose of solid waste at designated permitted landfill sites allocated by the local authorities.• Ensure that all drivers to be used on AICCRA activities have undertaken training in defensive driving, enforce maximum speed limits on roads and ensure adequate insurance cover for vehicles.• Overall, all implementing partners under AICCRA Zambia Cluster are required to adhere to and implementing measures contained in the project SEA/SH mitigation and response action plan. All partners under the AICCRA Zambia Cluster shall be required to provide a working environment that minimizes spread of COVID-19 among project workers and stakeholders. In so doing, these minimum measures will be followed accordingly.• Ensure social distancing at the workplace and offer a flexible working schedule for workers as and when necessary, include telecommuting. • Provide accessible sanitation areas with water, soap, and sanitizers at entrance to offices and other venues for project activities. • Provide all workers with appropriate hand sanitizers and face masks and require mandatory wearing of face masks at official premises and other work locations. • Ensure that all workers have adequate and updated information on COVID-19.• Establishing measures and a referral pathway including linkage with the Ministry of Health for workers who get infected with COVID-19 during line of duty. • The following emergency numbers will be available for reporting suspected cases of COVID-19.Partners must contact 999 or link up with local district health authorities for immediate evacuation or medical help. The Covid-19 Toll-free hotline is 909.• Provide adequate support to workers who get exposed to the virus at the work place.The Safeguard Focal Person for AICCRA Zambia will regularly monitor compliance of workers, consultants, and service providers to the above policies and procedures and provide biannual report to the AICCRA project management unit. All partners shall provide quarterly reports to IWMI on the status of ensuring compliance to the above policies and procedures.This LMP will be shared with all partners and project workers. The policies and procedures will further be disseminated to workers during scheduled training.The Zambian constitution and employment code prohibits the employment persons under the age of 15.It is also forbids employment of children under the age of 19 for certain hazardous work and for work requiring night shifts. In compliance with these national standards, persons under 19 years will not be permitted to work on the AICCRA Zambia Project as key project activities may exceed their capacity. IWMI will ensure that all sub-grantees adhere to this requirement.Age of potential new workers will be verified before engagement. The National Identification Card (ID), Passport, birth certificates or national driver's licenses will be used as proxy documents for verifying workers' age. In the absence of one of those forms of IDs, the project will apply and document an age verification process. The age verification process will consist of alternative methods including copies of academic certificates, testimony/affidavits from officials of the schools attended, a medical examination, statements from family members and locality/village officials/local authorities.In addition, all documents will be cross-referenced and subjected to a verification process to ensure the validity of the documents. In instances where the documents are thought to be falsified the project will conduct the same process to ensure their authenticity. In all the processes, the attendant care will be provided to ensure that the applicant or employee's data are protected and their right to privacy is guaranteed. All copies of the IDs and documents pertaining to the applicant's age and other supporting materials will be kept in files with the human resources personnel.The Zambian Employment Code sets the statutory terms and conditions for all employment arrangements in Zambia. Drawing from this Code, the table below provides an outline of terms and conditions that will inform management of all workers under the AICCRA Zambia project. • Salaries can be established by collective agreement. In the absence of a collective agreement, salaries are set by professional category. The minimum wage is determined on an hourly and monthly basis. • The salary scale and consultancy fees band of CGIAR centers will also provide a framework for setting salaries and fees of new employees and consultants based on inherent job description and grade without discrimination.• The hours of work of a worker shall be a maximum of eight hours a day or forty eight hours a week except in cases expressly provided for in this Act. • Where a worker in an undertaking works after the hours of work fixed by the rules of that undertaking, the additional hours done shall be regarded as overtime work.• A worker shall be given a rest period of forty-eight consecutive hours, in every seven days of normal working hours. The weekly rest day shall be any day in respect of which the employee is not required to work under the employee's contract of employment. • Workers shall also be entitled to rest on public holidays recognized as such by the Republic of Zambia. Annual leave• Under section 36 of the Employment Act, employees have a minimum of 24 annual leave days, which is paid. All partners will be required to comply with this statutory requirement. Maternity Leaves • A woman worker, on production of a medical certificate issued by a medical practitioner or a midwife indication the expected date of her confinement, is entitled to a period of maternity leave of at least fourteen weeks in addition to any period of annual leave she is entitled after her period of confinement.• No deductions other than those prescribed in labor laws shall be made hereunder or any other law or collective labor agreement shall be made from a worker's remuneration, except for repayment of advances received from the employer and evidenced in writing. Medical treatment of injured and sick workers• At minimum, all sub-grantees shall be required to enroll their workers on social welfare institutions. • Employees of CGIAR centers will be required to continue to benefit from existing medical insurance arranged by their respective research institutions.IWMI and CGIAR centers are committed to providing transparent and easily accessible grievance mechanism for all workers under the AICCRA Zambia project to report complaints relating to disagreement on working conditions, health and safety, discrimination, bullying, sexual harassment and abuse.Two major grievance mechanisms are currently available for all workers working on the AICCRA project to report labor related grievances including SEA/SH (i) the CGIAR grievance mechanism and (ii) the project grievance mechanism provided in the AICCRA Zambia SEP. All workers will be informed of the grievance mechanism at the time of their engagement on the project including measures put in place to protect them against any reprisal for its use. The mechanism will also allow for anonymous complaints to be raised and addressed through providing options for people reporting a grievance to not mention their names, positions or place or work station. Individuals who submit their complaints or grievances may request that their names be kept confidential and this must be respected.• Should the whistle-blower/reporter still feel either victimized or disadvantaged following the report and subsequent investigation, they may choose to escalate the issue to the next level in the form of an appeal to the next level of authority. Should the issue raised be with reference to the People and Organizational Development Director, then the whistle blower/reporter shall raise it with the Director General. In the event that the matter is with regards to the Director General, it may be raised with the Chair of the Board and subsequently in cases where the matter refers to the Chair of the Board, the staff member may raise it directly with the Director of the CGIAR Internal Audit Unit.• The Project workers' grievance mechanism will not prevent workers to use conciliation procedure provided in the Employment code. • If the complainant remains dissatisfied with the mediation effort of the project grievance committee, the complainant has the option to pursue appropriate recourse via judicial process of choice. The AICCRA project will allow any aggrieved person the right of access to Court of law. Courts of law will be a \"last resort\" option, in view of the above mechanism.The AICCRA Zambia grievance mechanism outlined in the cluster SEP constitutes an alternative pathway for project workers to report grievances including cases linked to SEA/SH. The mechanism provides for several channels for lodging complaints including emails, phone calls, texts, letters, and toll free line that will also be accessible to all workers. Information on this grievance will be made available to all workers to ensure that all workers have adequate knowledge on how to lodge a complaint and receive resolution through the mechanism.Given that most GBV cases at workplace are not reported because of the fear of victimization, anonymous reporting channels have been provided as part of AICCRA Zambia grievance uptakes points to encourage reporting of SEA/SH related cases. When such a case is reported, the complainant would be provided with information about the available services including confidentially appropriate medical and psychological support, emergency accommodation, and any other necessary services as appropriate including legal assistance. The Safeguard Focal Person will refer all SEA/SH survivors to relevant GBV service providers at Annex 6. When a case of that nature is reported, the Safeguard Focal persons will record the case with the following limited information the nature of the incident, the age and sex of the complainant, and whether the survivor was referred to a service provider.The AICCRA Zambia Grievance committee will review all cases referred to it to determine and agree upon course of action for handling and resolving the case. The appropriate institution that employs the perpetrator will be required to review the case and take disciplinary action in accordance with the employer's code of conduct and national legislation. Disciplinary actions may include informal warning, formal warning, additional training, loss of salary, suspension, or termination of employment. A survivor may continue to receive support from the appropriate GBV service providers while the case is being handled by the employer.The AICCRA Zambia Cluster will follow the project implementation manual (PIM) and ESRM guide to oversee management of grantees. In accordance with these documents the following measures and procedure will be followed.As and when the need arises for the cluster to engage a grantee that may engage contracted workers, IWMI shall make reasonable efforts to ascertain that the grantee is legitimate and reliable entity that will be able to comply with the relevant requirements of this LMP. These requirements shall be included in the Terms of Reference (ToR) or the Request for Proposals (RFP) document.As part of the process to select grantees that will engage contracted workers, IWMI will review business registration and permits, labor and OHS performance on previous projects. The potential grantees will also be required to complete an environmental and social screening form to confirm the absence of any unresolved OHS and SEA/SH cases, establish the grantees existing OHS system including HR polices and OHS guidelines, labor management records, and the expertise to implement the project activities in accordance with this LMP.All grantees' contracts are issued by ABC and consistent with existing practices, ABC shall incorporate agreed labor management requirements in all sub-agreements as specified in PIM and the ESRM guide. A summary of this is provided at Annex 5. The provision will also include appropriate non-compliance remedies such as suspension of grant disbursement and cancellation of grant project.Sub-grantees shall be required to provide quarterly reports to the AICCRA Zambia Safeguard Focal Person on the status of implementation of measures in this LMP. The AICCRA Zambia Cluster Lead, Country Coordinator and Safeguard Focal Person shall exercise direct oversight in monitoring the performance of grantees in relations to this LMP. The monitoring role will include inspections, spot checks of project locations or work sites and/or labor management records and reports compiled by the grantee. Grantees labor management records and reports that would be review would include the following:• Representative samples of employment contracts and signed CoC;• Records of training provided for contracted workers to explain occupational health and safety risks and preventive measures.• Grievances received from workers and their resolution;• Reports relating to fatalities, incidents and implementation of corrective actions; and• Records relating to incidents of non-compliance with national Labor Code and the provisions of the LMP.• Attend and actively partake in training courses related to SEA/SH and VAC as requested by the project. • Treat women, children (persons under the age of 18), and men with respect regardless of race, color, language, religion, political or other affiliation, nationality, ethnicity, or social origin, property, disability, birth or nationality, sexual orientation, gender identity, or other status. • Not use language or behavior towards women, children or men that is inappropriate, harassing, abusive, sexually provocative, demeaning or culturally inappropriate. • Not engage in sexual exploitation, which is defined as any actual or attempted abuse of position of vulnerability, differential power, or trust, for sexual purposes, including, but not limited to, profiting monetarily, socially, or politically from the sexual exploitation of another. • Not engage in sexual abuse, which is defined as the actual or threatened physical intrusion of a sexual nature, whether by force or under unequal or coercive conditions. • Not engage in sexual harassment, which is defined as any unwelcome sexual advance, request for sexual favor, verbal or physical conduct or gesture of a sexual nature, or any other behavior of a sexual nature that might reasonably be expected or be perceived to cause offense or humiliation to another, when such conduct interferes with work, is made a condition of employment, or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. • Not participate in sexual contact or activity with children-including grooming or contact through digital media (community members married to minors, even if legally done, will not be hired).Mistaken belief regarding the age of a child is not a defense. Consent from the child is also not a defense or excuse. • Not have sexual interactions with members of the host communities (NB: an exception applies to a locally hired worker already married to an adult member of the community). This includes relationships involving the withholding or promise of actual provision of benefit (monetary or non-monetary) to community members in exchange for sex-such sexual activity is considered \"non-consensual\" within the scope of this Code. • Consider reporting through the Grievance Mechanism or to my manager any suspected or actual SEA/SH or VAC by a fellow worker, whether employed by my company or not, or any breaches of this Code of Conduct.• Wherever possible, ensure that another adult is present when working in the proximity of children.• Not invite unaccompanied children unrelated to my family into my home unless they are at immediate risk of injury or in physical danger. • Not use any computers, mobile phones, video, and digital cameras or any other medium to exploit or harass children or to access child pornography (see also \"Use of children's images for work related purposes\" below). • Refrain from physical punishment or discipline of children.• Refrain from hiring children below the minimum age of 15, for domestic or other labor which places them at significant risk of injury, as specified by the national law • Comply with all relevant local legislation, including labor laws in relation to child labor and WorldBank's E&S standards on child labor and minimum age. • Take appropriate caution when photographing or filming children (see details below).• Before photographing or filming a child, assess and endeavor to comply with local traditions or restrictions for reproducing personal images. • Before photographing or filming a child, obtain informed consent from the child and a parent or guardian of the child. As part of this I must explain how the photograph or film will be used. • Ensure photographs, films, and videos present children in a dignified and respectful manner and not in a vulnerable or submissive manner. Children should be adequately clothed and not in poses that could be seen as sexually suggestive. • Ensure images are honest representations of the context and the facts.• Ensure file labels do not reveal identifying information about a child when sending images electronically.I understand that if I breach this Individual Code of Conduct, the grant partner will take disciplinary action which could include:• Informal warning.• Formal warning.• Additional Training.• Loss of up to one week's salary.• Suspension of employment (without payment of salary/contract fees), for a minimum period of 1 month up to a maximum of 6 months. • Termination of employment.• Reporting to the police if warranted. I understand that it is my responsibility to ensure that the environmental, social, health and safety standards are met. I will adhere to the occupational health and safety management requirements and avoid actions or behaviors that could be construed as SEA/SH or VAC. Any such actions will be a breach this Individual Code of Conduct. I do hereby acknowledge that I have read the foregoing Individual Code of Conduct, do agree to comply with the standards contained therein and understand my roles and responsibilities to prevent and respond to OHS, SEA/SH and VAC issues. I understand that any action inconsistent with this Individual Code of Conduct or failure to act mandated by this Individual Code of Conduct may result in disciplinary action and may affect my ongoing employment. Root causes…………………………………………………………………………………………… 2. Preventive Action taken………………………………………………………………………….Further Recommendation Preventive actions……………………………………………… Signature…………………………………………….Date……………………………………………….Project coordinator: Comments and Actions to be taken or recommended to higher authority:Signature…………………………………………….Date………………………………………………. even disciplinary measures. Workforce management procedures describe measures to prevent and combat harassment, bullying, and/or exploitation in the workplace.e. The Contract Party shall notify the AICCRA Cluster Safeguard Focal Person as soon as possible and no later than 24 hours after learning of any incident or accident related to the AICCRA Project which has, or is likely to have, a significant adverse effect on the environment, the affected communities, the public or workers. In addition, a report shall be provided to IWMI within 20 days of the occurred incident or accident. The report shall provide sufficient detail regarding the incident or accident, indicating immediate measures taken or that are planned to be taken to address it, and any information provided by any contractor and/or supervising entity, as appropriate. In the case of the incidents link with sexual abuse, exploitation and harassment, the Contact Party shall notify IWMI within 12 hours upon receipt of such allegations. f. The Contract Party shall sensitize all project staff and stakeholders about the AICCRA Zambia Grievance Mechanism (GM) and encourage them to lodge all complaints relating to the AICCRA project through the grievance uptake points provided.g. The contract party shall develop or adapt the code of conduct at annexure 4c for all consultants and employees engaged to work on AICCRA activities."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0760948476.json b/main/part_2/0760948476.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d0be9388bfeeae812a24ba9cac37812d368f54d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0760948476.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1100d5107dc037e612c3000114864769","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b9bfc482-94b7-48bd-9aa2-87fe87862438/retrieve","id":"512827290"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"49a9edf9-d60d-44af-8936-e7423841c169","content":"The European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN) is a collaborative programme among European countries aimed at ensuring the effective conservation and the sustainable utilization of forest genetic resources in Europe. It was established to implement Resolution 2 of the Strasbourg Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. EUFORGEN is financed by participating countries and is coordinated by IPGRI, in collaboration with the Forestry Department of FAO. It facilitates the dissemination of information and various collaborative initiatives. The Programme operates through networks in which forest geneticists and other forestry specialists work together to analyze needs, exchange experiences and develop conservation objectives and methods for selected species. The networks also contribute to the development of appropriate conservation strategies for the ecosystems to which these species belong. Network members and other scientists and forest managers from participating countries carry out an agreed workplan with their own resources as inputs in kind to the Programme. EUFORGEN is overseen by a Steering Committee composed of National Coordinators nominated by the participating countries.The geographical designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IPGRI or the CGIAR concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Similarly, the views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these participating organizations.Participants from 15 countries attended the meeting (see List of Participants). They were welcomed by J. Van Slycken, Director of Instituut voor Bosbouw en Wildbeheer (Institute for Forestry and Game Management) in Geraardsbergen. J. Turok, EUFORGEN Coordinator, thanked the host of the meeting and wished the participants a fruitful meeting. He mentioned the current activities in other Networks and described briefly the recent international developments in the area of forest genetic resources.F. Lefevre, Chair of the Network, then opened the meeting. He suggested that the most important objectives of the meeting were: (i) to evaluate outputs from the previous joint tasks, (ii) to closely involve the participants from all newly attending countries, and (iii) to initiate the development of in situ conservation strategies which should also result in practical work with shared responsibilities. The agenda of the meeting was approved (see Agenda).• to maintain populations with a broad genetic diversity to ensure adaptation to changing environmental conditions and that breeding programmes are provided with new genotypes.To achieve these objectives, eight EU member countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and United Kingdom) prepared a list of tasks which the following river systems: Danube, Drome, Loire, Rhine, Elbe, Ticino, Ebro, Rhine/Waal, Maas, Usk and Dee. The following tasks will be undertaken:1. Standardization of methods 2. Adaptation of molecular technology 3. Determination of cytotypes with chloroplast DNA analysis 4. Isolation of microsatellites 5. Assessment of diversity within and between natural river populations 6. Verification of existing genebanks 7. Life history traits of black poplar stands 8. Evaluation of data 9. Synthesis.The project will start on 1 March 1998 for a period of 3 years. The total budget is estimated at ECU 2100000 (with the contribution of the EU amounting to ECU 1260000).Possibilities of joint meetings, publications and a linked Internet home page with the Network will be explored, to provide maximum benefits of the results achieved for black poplar conservation in European countries. It was agreed that progress made by the EUROPOP Project will be briefly reported at each Network meeting. S. de Vries kindly offered to ensure the information flow with the Network.The methods are closely linked with each other, e.g. restoration schemes often become in situ conservation stands.The main responsibility for in situ conservation of P. nigra is with the national, regional or local authorities concerned. An international network will be built up on the basis of stands designated and managed at national level.The suggested network of in situ populations (stands) should cover the natural distribution range of the species, with regard to latitude, longitude, altitude, biophysical and environmental factors. Common criteria for choosing a site which should be included in the network are:• protection status; ownership; management • potential for natural regeneration • large size.To promote the establishment of a network of in situ populations, the P. nigra Network will:1. Conduct an inventory and produce a synthesis of existing knowledge on the effects of ecosystem management on dynamic processes in P. nigra populations -S. de Vries and 1.1. Popivshchy. 2. On the basis of a literature survey, prepare draft recommendations (including research needs) for the restoration of riparian ecosystems (use of genetic material for planting, etc.) -B. Heinze and M. DubskY. 3. Review possible indicators for monitoring the evolution of diversity in riparian ecosystem -F. Lefevre and D. Kajba.These three tasks will be developed for the next Network meeting; background documents on each of the tasks will be circulated one month before the next meeting (to be held in September 1998). The participants will send literature and written inputs to the coordinators of the new tasks of the Workplan by the end of the year 1997.The draft list of descriptors developed and circulated by N. Alba was reviewed. All participants will send additional comments and suggestions to N. Alba by 1 November 1997. N. Alba will send the final version for inclusion in the Report of the meeting to J.Turok by 1 December 1997. Missing diagrams and environmental descriptors will be prepared jointly by N. Alba, J. Van Slycken and P. Tabbush (in collaboration with existing relevant projects).Participants from countries with ongoing in situ conservation programmes will bring a sample list of stands already designated, following the new list of descriptors, for discussion during the next meeting of the Network. Optional (voluntary) descriptors, in addition to the common minimum list, are encouraged and should cover specific needs and conditions in each country.The synthesis was prepared and presented by S. de Vries. An update will be produced, including as many countries as possible from the distribution range. All participants will check the information on their respective country and send modifications to S. de Vries by 1 November 1997. S. de Vries will send the new version/table for the Report of the meeting to J. Turok by 1 December 1997. J. Turok will contact countries not participating in the Network (southern and eastern parts of the distribution range), to inform them about ongoing activities and ask for input by 15 October 1997.EUFORGEN core collection S. Bisoffi presented the status of the collection (see Reports of previous Network meetings). The multiplication of the collection has been delayed because of technical problems with cuttings received at the host institute in Casale Monferrato (see report of Italy in this volume). It was proposed to employ intensive multiplication techniques and duplicate the collection in a cooler climate at IBN-DLO in Wageningen (S. de Vries). The collection will also be made available for EUROPOP research.Certain clones need to be re-sent. S. Bisoffi and J. Turok will contact participants in countries which should re-send clones or send new material (from countries in the distribution range not participating in the Network). A reminder /invitation letter will be distributed by 1 December 1997. All material should be sent to both Casale Monferrato and Wageningen. Instructions for shipment should be followed carefully. Passport data according to the Network's list must accompany all clones.The database contains 1960 entries (as of October 1997; see report of Italy in this volume). Passport data for the clones in the core collection have been included, but some relevant information is still missing for individual clones. S. Bisoffi distributed sheets with these missing data directly to Network members, asked them to update the information on the core collection and send it back to him by 1 November 1997. He illustrated the importance of the missing data with examples of conflicting data for clones held at different institutions, and to detect possible duplicates. Belgium proposed to test such clones for which there is confusion about identity with genetic fingerprints. On the technical side, some database fields have been enlarged, and a new field added at the end (presence in the EUFORGEN core collection). S. Bisoffi stressed the importance of including the geographical coordinates with some examples.All participants received the data file on diskette (DOS/Windows, ExcelS, compressed with Pkzip). J. Turok will ensure that the updated file replaces the older version on the Internet home page of the Network, by 1 November 1997. New data as well as regular updates, including the supply of previously missing data, the correction of wrong data, or the deletion of clones no longer held in collection, should be done by the Network members and sent to S. Bisoffi on diskette by mail, or directly bye-mail by the end of the year 1997 and regularly afterwards. The next uploading on the Internet will be made earlier than 1 June 1998.A review presentation was given by B. Heinze on biochemical and molecular methods available for investigating introgression, genetic variation and clone differentiation in P. nigra. Chromatography of leaf and bud phenolic compounds, isoenzymes and DNA techniques were covered. Studies in P. nigra and other Populus species were compared and some thoughts for the use of suitable markers for different problems given. A working draft was distributed. Participants will supply further information and references to B. Heinze by 1 November 1997. The draft will be updated and sent by B. Heinze to J. Turok for inclusion in the Report of the meeting by 1 December 1997.A questionnaire was also distributed with a request for information on laboratories concerned with the application of molecular techniques to Populus species. Participants will contact such laboratories in their countries and send the questionnaire back to B.Heinze by 1 November 1997.The information received will be collated and supplemented with the list of EUROPOP participants, included in the Report of the meeting (to be sent by 1 December 1997). Contacts and possibly Internet home page links will be established with the Poplar Molecular Network based at the University of Washington, USA (B. Heinze and J. Turok).The Network's collection of slides was reviewed. S. de Vries mentioned the importance of receiving slides from all countries. The following areas are still not covered and should be supplemented before the next Network meeting:• wood patterns/burls • fodder for animals • pollen • mixed-species riparian stands • particular landscape: North Africa • drawings from the Identification Sheet.It was confirmed that a CD-ROM would be produced by IPGRI at a later stage.It was noted that the Report of the previous meeting (800 copies) had been widely distributed according to the mailing lists provided by the Network members. Network members are encouraged to send instructions/ addresses for further distribution in their countries to J. Turok by the end of the year 1997.• Literature review (addendum for 1997) was provided and participants will send additional references to F. Lefevre by 1 November 1997 in the format specified earlier; see Reports of the previous Network meetings).• Exchange of reference clones: requests for cuttings should be addressed to J. Van Slycken before the end of the year. • Leaf morphology: D. Kajba presented results of a recent study in Croatia (see this volume) and will prepare an overview for the next Network meeting.Following a short discussion among the participants, it was agreed to slightly broaden the scope of the Network and include Populus alba on the agenda in the future. This decision was made in light of the increasing efforts of the Network towards in situ conservation strategies in riparian ecosystems. The Network expressed its strong concern about the continuing uncertain situation of the Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura (Poplar Research Institute) in Casale Monferrato, Italy and recommended that every effort be made to ensure the maintenance of the unique collections and the scientific experience available at this Institute.It was suggested to hold the next, fifth Network meeting in conjunction with the International Union of Forestry Research Organizations (IUFRO) Poplar and Willow Breeding and Genetic Resources Working Group, in September 1998, in Orleans, France. 2 A tentative schedule suggests that Network meeting participants join the IUFRO excursions planned for 16-17 September 1998, as well as indoor sessions on 18 November 1998, and then continue for two days (19-20 September) with the actual Network meeting. This arrangement would enable Network members to attend both meetings, inform IUFRO Working Group members about the Network activities and jointly discuss several aspects of poplar conservation and genetic resources management.It was agreed that exchanging and updating information on the activities in countries play an important part of the Network's tasks. The progress reports from countries, briefly discussed during the meeting, are presented below in alphabetical order. They describe the period between the two Network meetings (October 1996(October -0ctober 1997)). The information provided typically includes mention of research, field inventories, practical implementation and public awareness activities.In addition, the report from Moldova summarizes the results of a study conducted within a project on geographic variability of black poplar in the former USSR. An interesting contribution from Malta, included for the first time in this Network, suggests that white poplar (P. alba) be given more attention in the future activities.Poland, Ukraine and FR Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) participated for the first time in a Network meeting as well and their introductory country reports are included at the end of this section. They bring the total number of countries which contributed information about the status and the national gene conservation activities on P. nigra to 20 countries (see Reports of previous meetings).Institute of Forest Genetics, Federal Forest Research Centre, 1140 Vienna, AustriaInvestigations in our own laboratory focused on markers for chloroplast and nuclear genes for the investigation of introgression of P. nigra with P. x euramericana. Chloroplast DNA can be readily distinguished with PCR tests by analyzing appropriate regions on the chloroplast genome (Heinze 1998). One nuclear DNA marker has been investigated that is also amenable to quick screenings of plants (Heinze 1997). By combining both tests, and applying further nuclear gene markers more recently developed, some introgression was found that was unnoticed phenotypically, in plants between 2-10 years of age. The magnitude of this introgression was roughly between 2 and 10%, depending on the population.More data were collected on residual populations and single trees. The Austrian participant for the common research project EUROPOP, the Austrian Research Centre Seibersdorf (K. Burg, S. Fluch) is ready for the start of the project.A meeting on international collaboration matters was held in Vienna in April 1997 which served as an introduction of the Networks to Austrian decision-makers (mainly in administration) and tried to clarify the relationships between the different conventions and international agreements concerning biodiversity and conservation. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) organized a meeting on rare and endangered tree species which included P. nigra. A number of articles were published in local forestry-related journals.The National Park of the Danube Floodplains east of Vienna which was opened last October brought with it a discussion on management plans which now address the black poplar vs. hybrid poplar problem. Local foresters within the National Park started P. nigra propagation from seeds in the nursery. The WWF, one of the landowners within the National Park, started a floodplain restoration programme by opening up side arms and waterways for frequent flooding. Experience with this project will be especially interesting in the light of the great flooding that occurred in eastern Austria in July 1997.There is very active support of the Network from the Salzburg and Styria regional governments with active help in surveying trips and an interest in black poplar trees as bird sanctuaries. The certification of the first Austrian P. nigra seed stand is pending which wo~ld allow the trading of seed and seedlings for forestry purposes without caseby-case permissions.Collecting of clones was carried out by the Institute of Forest Genetics in the areas of Styria, Lower Austria, parts of Salzburg and Upper Austria. Around 300 clones were collected, 200-250 of which successfully rooted and tested positive for 'purity' in laboratory. This lot, supplemented with a few more clones already collected and a few seedlings from previous years, will form the future Austrian core collection of P. nigra.Institute for Forestry and Game Management, 9500 Geraardsbergen, BelgiumThere are no young stands or natural regeneration of Populus nigra occuring in Belgium so far. Populus nigra is only found as relict trees, almost exclusively on private properties in the neighbourhood of farms. The trees were planted and propagated several decades ago around meadows and farms for the production of firewood. They were mostly kept, together with willows, as pollarded trees. This makes the in situ conservation of black poplar very difficult, as it depends on the goodwill of the farmers.In situ conservation, however, is possible by local authorities through legal protection as a nature monument. This procedure has been used until now by one municipality (Oosterzele) .Many of the trees are old and show damage from cattle or lightning, as well as by the increase in the scale of farming activities. This makes the ex situ conservation of P. nigra in Belgium very important.During the last year further surveying of relict trees has been undertaken. The work aims at locating the relict trees, evaluating their vitality (phytosanitary state, dimensions, etc.), enhancing and rejuvenating the ex situ collection, and updating the database. The location of each tree is registered by differential GPS (Global Positioning System). Trees already included in the database and conserved in nature, as well as new individuals, were collected. Owners, mostly farmers, were informed as much as possible about the rarity of black poplar in Belgium and about the current conservation programme.The activities undertaken in 1996 resulted in 23 new accessions in 11 different locations. For the first time, relict trees of P. nigra were found along the Meuse, the largest river in Belgium (Leten, Maasmechelen). Three new locations of P. nigra were found in the Dender Valley (Elst, Gages, Castiau), seven in the Yzer Valley (five of them were found in the same village of Woesten, two in Oost-Vleteren) and one in the Schelde Valley (Antwerpen). This brings the national ex situ collection to a total of about 130 trees in 40 different locations. We expect that this collection contains a certain number of genetically identical individuals due to vegetative multiplication by farmers which was, and still is, a common way to propagate poplars. For the screening of the genetic diversity of the ex situ collection, fresh young leaves from each individual of the ex situ collection were taken and are kept at -80°C. This material will be used in the future for extraction of DNA and genetic diversity studies at the DNA level.Duplicates of the newly collected material were exchanged with the Forest Research Institute at Gembloux (Walloon Region), so that in the near future the ex situ genebank will be maintained in two places in Belgium.Apart from collecting new material of P. nigra, the regeneration programme of the existing genebank, i.e. ex situ plantations of parents and offspring from intraspecific crossings made in the past, was given high priority. This programme started in 1994.Surveying of the relict population will continue. More attention will be paid to the morphological and genetic diversity of the ex situ collection. From each individual, a DNA fingerprint analysis will be made using the AFLP technique (Vos et al. 1995) and a database of the fingerprints will be set up. This will make the exclusion of identical genotypes possible and will facilitate the management of the ex situ collection.The study of the genetic diversity in the collection and among the different populations (Dender Valley, Yzer Valley, Schelde and Meuse Valley) is planned for th~ near future. The relationship between relict trees in Belgium and adjacent countries will also be studied. This will offer important information for nature development projects where re-introduction of black poplar along the main river courses is considered. These efforts are made possible through the participation of the Institute for Forestry and Game Management in the EU-funded EUROPOP Project.Furthermore, our Institute will study the genetic diversity of the Hungarian ex situ collection in the context of a Flemish-Hungarian cooperation project funded by the Flemish Community.Ante Krstinic and Davorin Kajba Faculty of Forestry, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia During 1997, selection of black poplar trees in the territory of the Republic of Croatia and the adjacent Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina was continued. In the area of the upper river Sava, 18 trees in total were selected and propagated. The success of autovegetative propagation ranged between 15 and 67%, depending upon the clone. In the central part of river Sava, 12 trees in total were selected, and 10 were successfully propagated vegetatively. The success of rooting per clone ranged from 4 to 96%. With the assistance of colleagues from the Faculty of Forestry in Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina), in the areas of Sarajevo, Kakanj and Zenica, 54 trees were selected and 50 trees were propagated. Rooting success of cuttings of these clones varied from 4 to 60%, with their very marked plagiothropic growth.The poplar clonal archive established in spring 1995 by the Mura river (Cakovec, Podturen) was completed this year with 27 new clones of black poplar, bringing the number to 61 clones. In spring of 1998 it is planned to complete the clonal archives with 28 additional new clones. In the Osijek area, by the Drava river, the establishment of another clonal archives is anticipated. So far, in the tree nursery ViSnjevac, near Osijek, 50 clones have been propagated for the purpose of establishing this new clonal archive.For the coming year we also plan to make a selection of the black poplar trees in the area of Eastern Slavonia and Baranja, along the Danube river. As a UNTAES zone, this area has been inaccessible until now, but its reintegration is just taking place. In this area, the best conserved specimens of native black poplar in Croatia can be found.There are two research institutes involved in the conservation of Populus nigra genetic resources in the Czech Republic, the Research Institute of Ornamental Gardening (with three research projects concerning conservation of genetic resources, genetic analyses and selection of new clones with good yield properties) and the Research Institute of Forestry and Game Management (with one research project concerning conservation of genetic resources and the central clonal archive maintained as a stool-bed). Since the last Network meeting we have continued the activities which were mentioned in the introductory country report last year.We described 12 new plus trees in the Central Labe Basin, 6 of which were vegetatively propagated. In spring 1998 we plan to describe an additional 12 plus trees in the Vltava Valley and 21 trees from extreme sites (uplands with altitude 400-600 m), which have already been vegetatively propagated (Table 1). Surveying and designating of plus trees will also continue in the valleys in South Moravia and in the Odra Valley in North Moravia.By surveying plus trees we discovered areas with natural regeneration. Altogether eight areas were registered, but only one is in natural conditions at a site which is sporadically flooded. Others are linked with human activity due to earthmoving works. In 1997 a stand of 0.5 ha was established with seedlings from controlled crossings as well as clones in the river Morava Basin. Next year we plan to establish a 1.5 ha stand in the Vltava Valley with seedlings from controlled crossings carried out in 1996 (Table 2). This year we carried out controlled crossings with two objectives: one is to conserve genetic resources of regional populations, the other is to obtain clones with good yield properties. For this purpose, we used plus trees from various areas from lowlands to uplands, where we expect to find genetic variability due to different selection pressure. The seedlings will be used for planting additional research plots. Genetic analyses Enzyme systems for easy identification P. x euramericana (6-PGD, LAP, PGI), P. x berolinensis (AeO) and P. trichocarpa (PER) were chosen. These enzyme systems were also tested for identification of introgression between P. nigra and P. x euramericana and P. nigra and P. x berolinensis from controlled crossings. The knowledge obtained was used for analyses of young populations of P. nigra (two populations from areas with natural regeneration, three populations from open-pollinated progenies). In these populations 0-10% of introgressive hybrids were detected.Fran~ois Lefevre INRA Unite de Recherches Foresm~res Mediterraneennes, 84000 Avignon, FranceThe National Commission for the Conservation of Forest Genetic Resources has prepared a 'charter' to be signed by all partners involved in the conservation of forest tree genetic resources. This document defines the general scope of the programme and operational organization. The conservation of P. nigra is included in that national programme.The collection of clones, initially set up by INRA, has been transferred to the administrative nursery of Guemene Penfao and a new stool-bed of 251 accessions was planted according to Network's guidelines (de Vries 1996). A new populetum (conservation adult tree plots) was also planted in Bourret, with 215 accessions.The collection is now split into (1) active collection, and (2) complementary collection. The active collection in conserved both in stool-beds and as adult tree plots, submitted to evaluation process in the nursery and through laboratory techniques. It presently contains 262 clones, and it will be increased to 500 clones in the coming years. The sampling strategy allows 1 to 5 clones per collecting site, according to the original population size. The active collection will be maintained at 500 accessions, but adjustment will be allowed either to include new origins or to improve the representation of some origins according to new information on the organization of genetic diversity. The complementary collection is only conserved as adult tree plots, and may be used as a 'reservoir' of genetic resources in the future.Cultivated hybrid poplars can interact with wild P. nigra in different ways. One is the introgression process, another interaction possibly involves parasites. Melampsora rust populations are evolving rapidly, following the evolution of the set of cultivated clones with race-specific resistance (Pinon and Frey 1997). From another point of view, the natural co-evolution processes with P. nigra led to different Melampsora rust populations in the wild riparian sites. In a collaboration between pathologists and geneticists, we studied the diversity of both P. nigra and Melampsora in eight natural stands along four rivers. The rust populations differed in terms of species or pathotype content. However, the poplar populations were not different, neither at isoenzyme markers nor for genetic components of partial resistance to different rust races. Quantitative components of partial resistance were under genetic control, and quantitative clone-race interaction was significant. It was concluded that differences among rust populations in wild riparian sites could not be attributed to genetic differences of the host populations, although rust can represent a significant selection pressure at within-stand level, due to the highgenetic variation for resistance and the quantitative clone-race interactions (Louveau 1997).BeZa T6thl, Sandor Bordacs 2 , Ern6 Gabnai2, Zoltan Gencsi Field description of P. nigra stands or subcompartments registered in the national forest inventory has been continued, but at a less than necessary rate because of the lack of financial means. The conclusion drawn so far is that only a small part of P. nigra stands registered in the management plans are true P. nigra occurrences.The Ministry of Agriculture founded a Council for Plant Genetic Resources. Its tasks are as follows:• organizing the genebank works according to international standards • development of guidelines for the management of gene reserves in Hungary. In the frame of the above-mentioned Council, a forestry taskforce is aiming at forest gene conservation including that of P. nigra. In 1997 the activity of ISP included the maintenance of the P. nigra collections, as well as updating the Network's P. nigra database.Almost all the clones included in the ISP collection (532 genotypes) were propagated in a stool-bed in the Mezzi farm in Casale: about 30 cuttings per clone were planted.All the cuttings obtained from the material received last year (from Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom and FR Yugoslavia) for the constitution of the 'core collection' were propagated in a new stool-bed in 1997 together with the cuttings obtained from the reference clones. About 800 cuttings were planted altogether.Also the cuttings received this year from Romania and Ukraine and those re-sent from Austria, Czech Republic and the Netherlands (about 200 cuttings) were included in the same stool-bed.The stool-beds established in 1996 were maintained so that it will be possible to collect cuttings planted in both years in 1998.A collection was planted with 179 clones to complete the duplication of the ISP collection as adult tree plots in another locality (near Rome).Considering the great number of genotypes, no more than four plants per clone were planted with a spacing of 4 x 3 m; two trees per clone will be removed after several years so as to widen the spacing.An experimental plantation was established at Roaschia, a locality near Cuneo in the Piedmont Region, using some of the genotypes selected from the nursery tests conducted several years ago, where certain genotypes were used as parents in the artificial crossings (50 genotypes altogether). ' J. Pourtet', the only P. nigra clone registered in Italy for commercial use, was used as reference clone.Populus nigra genotypes were used in two different kinds of crossings during 1996 and 1997.Some of the genotypes selected as best parents from progeny tests and some of the genotypes selected from nursery tests were used as parents in intraspecific crossings planned in the P. x euramericana breeding project. Five different families with more than 100 seedlings were obtained. Some artificial crossings were carried out with genotypes highly resistant and highly susceptible to Marssonina, Melampsora and Phloeomyzus passerinii, to evaluate the behaviour of progenies towards diseases and insects both in the field and in the laboratory (with molecular markers). Six different families with over 200 seedlings were propagated in the field.In addition to the information about the ex situ collections in France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and Turkey, data regarding the clones maintained in Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Hungary, United Kingdom and FR Yugoslavia were included in the P. nigra database during 1997 (1960( entries in October 1997)).Similarly the information regarding the clones sent to ISP for the constitution of the core collection was included in the database.Although for most of the clones in the database a lot of the information (passport data) is available, for some genotypes only the name and the country of origin are known.Three genotypes of P. nigra of Piedmont origin (about 50 plants) and some genotypes of P. alba (about 120 plants) were planted together with some other riparian species for the re-establishment of a riparian forest within the Park of the river Po.No specific legislation about P. nigra was proposed, but some recent regulations regarding rivers and poplar cultivation might be relevant to P. nigra conservation.According to the national Law n.37 approved in 1994 (Regulation for the environmental protection of rivers, torrents, lakes and other State waters), the right of pre-emption on the use of land abandoned by rivers as a consequence of river dynamics was shifted from the owners of the adjacent land to public authorities or consortia provided they use the land for nature conservation, environmental restoration or other nature protection purposes. Land use for other purposes (including poplar cultivation) is subject to the approval by a provincial commission.A plan regarding fluvial areas was approved in 1996 by the Po river Authority. This plan classifies fluvial areas into three zones on the basis of the risk of flooding. As for the first zone, i.e. the area next to the river and subject to regular flooding, a proposal is at present under discussion which would put severe restrictions on poplar cultivation along several tributaries of the river Po.Ivan 1. Popivshchy and Andrey E. Prokazin Russian Tree Breeding Centre (CENTRLESSEM), 141200 Pushkino (Moscow), Russian FederationAs a tree of lowlands, black poplar grows in the European part of Russia between the rivers Severnaya Dvina in the north and Terek in the south, and Seversky Donets in the west and the Urals in the east. Its northernmost border at 63°N latitude is of particular interest (according to V.H. Sukachev, see Lositsky 1955). In Siberia black poplar reaches 64° latitude in the lowlands of the Enisei river. The northern border of the black poplar range in Europe recently has been defined more precisely by Skvortsov and Gadirca (1986). The northernmost black poplar occurrence has been discovered on one of the islands on the Severnaya Dvina river. It seems strange that in the most inclement climate, black poplar can almost reach the White Sea, but in the west, it sharply deviates to the south. It is assumed that the northern border of this species' range from northeast to southwest coincides with the contour of the so-called Wurm glacial cover.In spite of many useful properties and incidentally undertaken protection measures, there has never been a special gene conservation programme for black poplar in Russia (see Report of the previous meeting). Generally, some unfavourable tendencies are currently recognized: areas under black poplar stands are reducing; the stands are threatened by pests and diseases; the productivity is declining.In 1955 Prof. K.B. Lositsky wrote that black poplar was one of the most disease-free and pest-resistant species. In the area of the middle Volga river, the mean growing stock of black poplar mature stands reached 824 m 3 /ha (Table I), an annual increment of nearly 20 m 3 /ha. Black poplar was considered to grow from 1.5 to 2 times faster than aspen. The situation has worsened since the end of the 1960s (Kargov 1968). Black poplar stands have been increasingly declining. Their areas, stock, mean stand density stocking, prevailing site quality classes and overall phytosanitary condition were lowered (Shatalov et al. 1984).One of the main causes of black poplar decline is the regulation of river flow (see Table 2). Many poplar stands existed only because of additive flooding. The regulation of flooding led to an increase of natural aridity. On the other hand, many poplar stands disappeared owing to man-made hydroelectric power station dams. For example, the Republic of Mari-El lost all poplar stands for this reason. Because of river flow regulation, the period of winter flooding in the zones of low-level black poplar stands is doubling, having a negative impact on the stands (Nevidomov 1993).1. Changed flood dynamics due to hydroelectric power stations 2. Increase of the total aridity because of flow regulation 3. Decrease of sediment particles in the water (due to their accumulation in dam ponds), decline of alluvial process 4. Doubling of winter flooding period in the zone of low-level black poplar stands as a result of flow regulation 5. Air pollution 6. Global climate changes.Other reasons for black poplar decline are air pollution and climate change. As a result of all these factors, according to our latest data, black poplar stands in 14 regions of European Russia have been completely lost, and in others are greatly reduced (Table 3). Inventories of natural resources of black poplar would be the first step for providing an insight of the level of threat to the species. Such an inventory must be planned for some regions and subregions at the level of local administration, national parks, reserves, forestry departments and divisions. The distribution of black poplar in the plains of European Russia offers an ideal possibility to study and preserve its diversity along the geographic gradient (clinal patterns) from north to south.It is necessary to maintain populations of the species with considerable morphological variation (burl forms, flushing, etc.) in the areas of Volga, Don, Terek and other rivers. Methodical training and instruction of collaborators for field surveying and identification of black poplar stands are very important. The exploration of introgression and its consequences are also of great importance. Black poplar was actively used in Russia and the former USSR in breeding programmes as a parent of some hybrid varieties, such as 'Pioneer', 'Russky', Michurinets', selected by acad. A.s. Yablokov and others. Many experimental plantations and genebanks have been established in breeding institutions (stool-beds, adult tree plots and others). A revision of the plantations and genebanks network as ex situ conservation units is needed.A particular problem is the regeneration of old collections. It may be necessary to establish protected areas, especially for black poplar, and take legal and technical measures to restrict the plantation of other poplar species and hybrids in the vicinity of such protected areas. The scientific programme of black poplar conservation must include studies of its population genetic structure, geneflow, vegetative versus sexual reproduction of native stands in different environments, and others. However, all of the above measures require corresponding funding.An example to illustrate the scattered distribution and the difficulties faced can be given from the Volgograd region, where black poplar grows in 33 forestry enterprises. Every enterprise includes from 10 to 15 divisions. Each of these forestry divisions comprises several hundred compartments, where black poplar is represented by 1 to 10 units. The area of one compartment ranges from 0.1 to nearly 50 ha, depending on relief, landscape and other local peculiarities. For example, in one such forestry division belonging to the Sredne-Ahtubinsky forestry enterprise, black poplar grows in an area of 706 ha in 301 compartments.A general programme of black poplar conservation is lacking in Russia. The breeding institutions fulfil their specific breeding tasks. Therefore, at a national level, we first need to coordinate funding, inventories and research on the amount and structure of genetic diversity of the species. The minimum task is to identify and preserve an adequate sample of this diversity.The project on the conservation and reproduction of black poplar was continued. During the year, 27 plus trees were selected in the lower part of the river Morava, in the central V iih region and in the East Slovakian lowland. Reproductive materials taken from the plus trees were rooted in the poplar nursery.A subpopulation from intraspecific hybridization P. nigra '5' x P. nigra '74' was evaluated for qualitative and quantitative parameters. The results will be published in 1998.Inventory of an experimental plot with high representation of P. nigra (0.5 ha) was conducted which is part of a larger gene reserve. The possibilities for natural regeneration were investigated in the lower part of the river Hron. A central stool-bed in Gabcikovo was inventoried.Nuria Alba 1 f L. Plana 2 and Carmen Maestro 2 1 Area de Selvicultura y Mejora Genetica, INIA, 28080 Madrid, Spain 2 Unidad de Recursos Forestales (SIA-DGA), 50080 Zaragoza, SpainDuring the last year our activities with regard to surveying of new materials focused on the Ebro Valley in the autonomous province of Navarra where there are approximately 170 ha of Natural Reserves of riparian forest type. Populus nigra grows within these Reserves.Surveying in the autonomous provinces of Castilla-Leon, and particularly in the Duero Valley, has shown a very different scope. Throughout this area, the riverbank forests are practically disappearing because of the prolonged human activities. Nowadays, these areas have been replanted with new clones and very often P. nigra grows mixed with other cultivated poplars. We catalogued a few reduced stands with P. nigra in spite of the scarce surface of riverbank forest stands and the difficulties in identifying the clones.We continued with the collecting. Twenty-three clones from the newly surveyed area in Duero Valley were collected.At the SIA-DGA nursery, the activities aimed at ex situ conservation were continued. During the last year, a stool-bed was established with 42 clones from the existing collection that maintains a total of 110 clones. The remaining clones will also be used for the establishment of stool-beds later.In collaboration with a LIFE Project to restore riparian areas, some clones were propagated in a nursery to be used in the re-establishment of the riparian vegetation.There is no conservation in situ in the strict sense of the word. At the most there are Natural Protected Areas, which protect the wildlife and particularly the birds; however, any management is excluded. Some trees are catalogued as singular individuals, but no special regulation for their protection has been applied.Paul Tabbush Forestry Commission, Alice Holt Lodge Station, Wrecclesham-Farnham, Surrey, UKClone collections established at three sites in East England and Wales contain a total of 76 clones. In the winter of 1997, efforts will be made to ensure that all the clones are established at all the sites. As soon as sufficient material is available, a stool-bed collection will be established at Alice Holt. It is clear that there is much duplication in this collection and, as soon as sufficient information is available from DNA studies, the collection will be rationalized to maximize the number of distinct genotypes.Cottrell et al. (1997) used RAPD markers to study 36 accessions from this collection and found only 17 distinct genotypes. Genotypes were local in their distribution and genetic diversity was low. These authors also concluded that there had been so much interference by humans that there are unlikely to be distinct Eastern and Western types. In a more concentrated study of black poplar in the Upper Severn area, Winfield et al. (1998) used AFLP analysis to examine genetic diversity in 146 individuals and 3 individuals considered to be non-betulifolia poplars. Genetic diversity was low, confirming the results of Cottrell et al. (1997). There was a general correlation between geographic proximity and genetic similarity. They concluded that it was possible to identify a small number of individuals showing maximum diversity for inclusion in a replanting/conservation programme.Of the 36 trees sampled by Cottrell et al. (1997), only 6 were female, and DNA analysis of these revealed that there were only two distinct genotypes, despite the fact that they were sampled from a wide geographic range.The ERMAS I programme was established in 1992 to increase our understanding of the processes controlling the structure and function of European river margin ecosystems through a Europe-wide network. ERMAS II focuses on the role of biodiversity in determining the sensitivity of river margin ecosystems to environmental conditions, particularly temperature and hydrology (see Tabbush this volume).A group of researchers and interested parties from local authorities meets once per year to consider the national strategy and to coordinate the research. A national database of in situ preserved trees has been established and is being maintained through the Botanical Society of the British Isles (BSBI). Trees are selected on morphological characteristics by a BSBI referee. Large, old trees are most likely to be selected as true black poplars.Since many of these old trees are in imminent danger of collapse, the main conservation measure is to take cuttings, to preserve the genotype. However, this programme is not well resourced, and is often only recorded at local level. There is a danger that knowledge of the existing distribution and variability of these trees will be lost.The initial press campaign resulted in much local interest and this has enabled the collection of data about the distribution of the existing trees. There is a high level of awareness about the importance of the old trees, at local and national levels, but as yet this has not been translated into funding for a concerted campaign to study and conserve the genetic diversity of the remaining resource.Black poplar grows rapidly and mature stands reach the productivity of about 28-32 m 3 /ha annually. Mature stands are generally considered to be 20-25 years old. From this point of view, the economic importance of black poplar is obvious.Black poplar extends over a very broad geographic area. We investigated different populations from the Arctic Ocean to the Caucasus. We presumed that there is an ecogeographic variability correlated with climatic conditions in this area. This contribution summarizes the results of a study conducted within a comprehensive project on geographic variability of black poplar in the former USSR.The study used bibliographical data and different herbaria from Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kiev, Arkhangelsk, etc. In accordance with data studied, the first information about black poplar in the eastern limit of its area is from the middle of the 17th century, from the end of the 19th and first part of the 20th century. We studied black poplar in the following geographic regions:• Arkhangelsk, Severnaya Dvina river A comparative trial with the different provenances was created at the Great Botanical Garden (Moscow). Over a period of 3 years we studied the adaptation of black poplar in these conditions.Only the populations which grow in the conditions of inundation were studied. We observed that the natural regeneration from seeds had occurred only in one case, on the bank of the Hoper. Generally, natural regeneration of poplar is very rare but represents a special interest because the forests which grow from seeds always have better development.We carried out a special investigation of black poplar in the northeastern part of the distribution area, in the Arkhangelsk region and the Republic of Komi. The northern limit in which black poplar grows was defined more precisely. At the same time we observed that black poplar grows satisfactorily in northern conditions, even at 62-64° latitude.The geographic variability was studied by analyzing the comparative trial established in homogeneous conditions at the Great Botanical Garden.In 1983 we planted material from four geographic regions. Better growth was reached with the plants collected from the centre of distribution (Ulianovsk) as seen in Table 1. The levels of variation in all cases are relatively uniform. In 1984 we planted materials from all geographic regions. In general, the second experiment confirms the results of the first experiment (see Table 2). During our investigations it was observed that the plants collected from the south were partially damaged by frost. Therefore, we carried out a supplementary study of the structure of vegetative buds of plants which developed from cuttings and from seeds.A special study was dedicated to sexual dimorphism, but no differences between female and male plants in relation with the vegetative traits were observed.Black poplar was studied in a vast area of about 2300 km wide with rather uniform geomorphological conditions. This gave an ideal opportunity to study the geographic variability correlated with the changes of climate. The investigations led to the following conclusions:1. The plants collected from the south, being introduced to central regions and hence moved to the north, were damaged by frost. The plants from the north finish their vegetative cycle earlier and have a slow growth; the best growth performance was shown by the local genotypes. 2. The variation observed has a normal distribution. 3. The vegetative buds of plants which grow form cuttings are more sensitive to unfavourable winter conditions than buds of plants grown from seeds. 4. Black poplar grows satisfactorily under extreme conditions. This may be confirmed with the state of some natural populations from the northeastern margins of the distribution area. 5. In accordance with our investigations it was impossible to determine sex in relation to the vegetative traits.Populus alba L.Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Agriculture and Research Development Centre, Ghammieri, Marsa, MaltaIt is believed that the ancient Maltese dedicated this tree to Hercules, but after their conversion to Christianity in AD 60, poplar (luq in Maltese) was looked upon as a sign of gaiety and happiness. In fact, historians of the Middle Ages describe how on Mnarjathe farmers' festival held annually in Buskett woodland -the menfolk used to pluck branches of poplar from this woodland to take away with them. Mnarja, broken down from the Italian word \"luminaria\" or \"lume\" (in Latin) meaning illumination was socalled because of the number of bonfires the revellers made for cooking and for lighting the night festivities. The populace was allowed in this woodland only once a year on the eve of St. John's feast, which falls on 29 June, by the ruling Order of St. John, better known as the Knights of Malta.The tenacious poplar There are no natural stands of Populus nigra in Malta, although a few specimens were imported and cultivated. However, there are a few small stands of P. alba growing in the valleys as true natives. The largest colony is at Buskett in a valley carrying the name of the poplar in the vernacular, i.e. wied il-Iuq. As is expected, poplars are found in areas where the soil is rather deep (as in the case of silt and soil washed down into the valley from higher ground, due to soil erosion) and where water is available for most of the year. The ability of the white poplar to sucker freely has enabled it to service our heavily populated country (1037 persons/km 2 excluding the annual 1 million tourist arrivals). Moreover, its ability to sucker freely after a fire has ensured its survival on an island, situated in the middle of the Mediterranean, from Phoenician times to this century. Invaders, conqueror pirates, slave traders and mercenaries all have two things in common, i.e. the sword and fire. Burning away what could not be pilfered had its effect on Malta's woodlands. Grazing of goats, the poor mans' cow, also took its toll on poplars, but since the Buskett woodland was \"out of bounds\" to the population for several hundred years, the ribbon stands of poplar along the valley embankment thrived well.Seedlings of poplar raised from cuttings, and from suckers taken from these stands in winter over the last 30 years or so by the Department of Agriculture for propagation purposes, have extended the poplar population to various streets, housing estates and other urban plantations, where tall, fast-growing trees were needed to screen or scale down tall buildings. This species is also included in afforestation schemes involving valleys. Its qualities of bright, shimmering leaves in summer, bark colour and fast growth are being exploited more and more by the landscape gardener. Lack of knowledge of the capabilities of this species and particularly its vigorous growth sometimes leads to problems with services, e.g. water pipes, sewage, etc. Attention is paid to avoid planting stands close to agricultural land because of the suckers which may intrude into the fields, thus drawing complaints from farmers.The Structure Plan for the Maltese Islands (1990) followed by the Environment Protection Act of 1991, offer a basis of protection for, among other things, the poplar stands growing in the wild.Moreover, the proposed \"Trees and Woodlands (Protection) Regulations\", awaiting endorsement through Parliament, have listed P. alba and P. balsamifera under Schedule I for strictly protected trees.Malta proposes that this Network extend its work to cover P. alba. Much work has already been carried out on this species by various countries in the 1950s. However, there is scope for streamlining and updating this work as has been done for in situ and ex situ conservation of P. nigra. The economic value of this species is well known, but one must also see to the preservation of the genetic diversity within the existing stands. The tissue culture facilities available in the countries participating in the Network could be included in conservation work in favour of this species. The black poplar, an Eurasiatic species with a very broad range of distribution, occurs in almost all parts of Poland. The northern limit of its range passes across Poland. Black poplar can be found in many places beyond this limit, but its natural stands are distributed in southern and central parts of Poland along major rivers such as the Vistula, Bug, Odra, Warta and their tributaries, but not eastern and western Pomerania. It grows along river banks, very often on flooded alluvial terraces together with willow, creating the characteristic forest association Saliceto-Populetum. Up to now, smaller and larger areas of a poplar-willow forest are preserved in groups and as single trees. In the Vistula valley, especially in its central part where the river is still almost wild, P. nigra is better preserved than on the river Odra, which is a more regulated river.Along the Vistula valley, old clumps of the species meet old riverside forests on backwaters and islands. Small and large clumps occur near Ostomecko, \"Tokarska\" near Plock. From these natural stands the black poplar trees spread onto neighbouring land where they are cultivated, sometimes mixed with other poplar species and hybrids on meadows, banks, along roads and in villages and towns. The distribution of black poplar in Poland is described in many floristic papers, but primarily in the\" Atlas of distribution of trees and shrubs in Poland\" Part 8 \"P. nigra\" by K. Borowicz and M. Gostynska-Jakuszewska (1969).Ecotopes of poplar stands are continuously under transformation by natural processes (changes of courses of unregulated rivers) and civilization pressure (control of rivers, expansion by farming and forest plantations, urbanization, river transport, etc.). These transformations in Poland, however, are at a lower level compared with western Europe, mainly due to economic problems and opposition to the regulation of rivers by nature conservation movement. Many plans for regulating the Vistula, such as building reservoirs, dams, polders and cascade systems, have not yet been carried out, but are planned to prevent flooding and to keep water to the correct deficit in the future.It is necessary to preserve black poplar, in its natural ecotopes. Up to now there are no special collections of P. nigra as representatives of populations. Towards the end of the 1970s, the surveying, selection and registration of trees in natural stands was conducted by the the author. Many of them are still preserved to this day. Of the fast-growing tree species, black poplar (Populus nigra L.) and its hybrids are the promising source of pulpwood and other timber products. In the Ukraine, only 14% of which is covered by forests, this species has been used in breeding programmes for a long time.Populus nigra occurs as scattered individual trees or small groups of trees over the whole territory of the Ukraine, excluding mountain regions. There are pure and mixed stands of black poplar located along the rivers on plains.Over the last 10-15 years, systematic surveys of poplar stands have been made by collaborators of our Institute. Over 8200 ha of poplar stands including more than 3500 ha of P. nigra stands were surveyed. Unfortunately, pure natural P. nigra stands were not found. Most of the poplar stands are artificial plantations; the origin of the rest is unknown. The stands are on average 25-35 years old. They were planted during the campaign which was carried out in the 1960s. These plantations belong to the commercial forests, and thus most of them have already been felled. The rest of the stands are, on the whole, in a poor state. Most of the trees show pronounced damage and there are many epicormic shoots on the trunks.At the same time, about 30 plus trees were chosen within the stands. These trees were propagated vegetatively to the clonal archives and some of them were propagated by seeds in the collection plantations.Much prominence was given to obtain the productive resistant individual trees, which were used for planting. This large programme was carried out in the 1950s and 1960s under the supervision of Prof. N. Starova. In 1959 the breeding programme, composed of 10 breeding centres and 17 variety-testing points, was organized (Starova 1962(Starova , 1980)). This system covered almost all the climatic zones of the Ukraine. Its tasks were:1. to find, select, propagate and test native productive and resistant forms of poplar species and their spontaneous hybrids 2. to obtain, test and propagate productive artifical hybrids.According to the first task, about 250 plus trees were chosen including more than 40 trees of P. nigra.The main activity concentrated around the second task because interspecific hybrids often have more valuable features than their parents. During a 10-year period, over 460 crossings were made and more than 600 000 hybrids were obtained, from which about 900 plus trees were chosen. These trees were tested in preliminary trials and over 40 varieties were selected, more than 10 with P. nigra as one of the parents. A part of these clones has been included in the Register of certified varieties of plants of the Ukraine. The rest are being tested.Simultaneously, studies of flowering and fructification were carried out. Forming of flower buds, stamens, pistils and ovules, micro-and megasporogenesis, male and female gametophytes, pollination, fertilization and fructification were investigated, as well as inheritance and early diagnostics of sex. As one of the outputs of these studies, the sexual dimorphism of seeds and seedlings was recognized. The male plants grow from lightpink seeds (colour is estimated using a binocular), female plants grow from light-yellow seeds. The analogous pattern is also shown for colour of hypocotyles. Similarly regular patterns were recognized for Populus tremula, P. alba, P. canadensis and P. pyramidalis (Vasylenko 1970(Vasylenko , 1971)).The Ukraine has no specific legislation for the protection of poplar stands. A part of poplar stands is included in protected forest communities (water-protective forests etc.). The majority of poplar stands are in managed forests. Natural regeneration of poplar forests is common practice.At the same time, a substantial genepool of plus trees is stored in clonal archives. Such plantations were created at each breeding centre or at each testing point. Unfortunately, financial support for these units is now drastically decreased. Thus, we risk the loss of these units owing to the financial constraints, the selection of new plus trees is also reduced. Now the main task of our activity is to maintain these units with rninimallosses.Sas a Orlovic Poplar Research Institute, 21000 Novi Sad, F.R. YugoslaviaThe group of 'European black poplars' in Yugoslavia includes several described species: Populus nigra L., P. pubescens (ParI.) Jov. et Tuc., P. pannonica Kit. et Bess., P. metohiensis Tuc., and occurrences of spontaneous, simple and complex hybrids also have been recorded. All these species occur in Yugoslavia naturally, the former three species in the north (Vojvodina Province), and the fourth in the south. The area of distribution of domestic black poplars is smaller and narrower than that of aspens and white poplars. Black poplars build pure stands (Populetum nigrae) and they also form part of the Slavonian oak, white poplar and white willow forest types, as well as of a large number of shrub willows in the pioneer stage of development of these communities (Herpka 1963;Jovanovic and Tucovic 1965). The distribution of black poplar is connected with the distribution of sandy alluvial soils on which poplars have no competition. Pure and mixed young stands usually inhabit the higher reaches of sandbanks, and only rarely the lowest parts of alluvial deposits, where young growth of black poplar occurs in a mixture with white poplar and willows (Herpka 1963). In Yugoslavia, only a small portion of European black poplars has been preserved. There were better and more handsome specimens in stands that existed up to the 1970s. Today, the stands of domestic black poplars have been greatly reduced in favour of Euramerican poplar, or else they have been destroyed in the course of the river regulation works, or during the development of water storage facilities. In addition, European black poplar is slowly disappearing because of its susceptibility to bark diseases (Dotichiza populea) and leaf diseases (Melampsora spp. and Marssonina brunnea). Under natural conditions, they mostly reproduce by seeds, which results in frequent occurrences of spontaneous hybrids.The works on the conservation and development of the genepool of European black poplar (P. nigra) in Yugoslavia were parallel to the programme of poplar breeding, namely the creation of new poplar cultivars, carried out by the Poplar Research Institute in Novi Sad. In this programme, European black poplar genotypes were used as male partners in controlled crossings, mainly with the genotypes of Populus deltoides.The main focus of the programme is ex situ preservation. Within this goal, 60 trees have been selected since 1993. The cuttings were planted in lines. Thirty-nine genotypes were successfully propagated and they have been maintained in genetic collections (Table 1). These genotypes were examined for their susceptibility to leaf diseases (Melampsora spp. and Marssonina brunnea). The results showed great variability in this respect, i.e. that the collections include genotypes ranging from very susceptible to resistant. The research performed by Orlovic (1996) shows that European black poplar genotypes have a stable behaviour pattern regarding several anatomical, physiological and morphological characters in various sites, which has an enormous significance for further breeding.It has been planned to establish plantations from these genotypes with a significant potential for seed production, i.e. the source of new combinations.In Yugoslavia the total area of poplar plantations is about 31000 ha. About 400 ha are natural areas of European black poplar and white willow. The largest areas of European black poplar suitable for conservation in situ occur in the northern part of Yugoslavia (river Danube, region of Apatin). This is an area of about 200 ha covered by natural populations of this species. Activities have been started to protect this region completely and to exclude it from regular commercial management.In setting about the genetic conservation of forest trees, it is perhaps surprising to find that black poplar has been seen as a good place to start. Reasons for seeking to conserve it are:• its natural habitat -the floodplain forest -has been lost to agriculture over large areas of Europe, and is still being eroded • it is easy to propagate by cuttings • it is one parent of the commercially important hybrid Populus x canadensis (syn. P. euramericana) (P. deltoides x P. nigra) • it is highly resistant to bacterial canker (Xanthomonas populi) and shows some resistance to other important diseases of poplar • on a European scale, poplar is highly significant economically.Existing populations therefore certainly contain genes of commercial value, but there is also a wealth of genetic variation of which we are unaware, and which may be used one day by tree breeders to counter adverse environmental changes, or new pests and diseases.Relict populations which no longer reproduce sexually will contain less genetic wealth than populations which continue to evolve naturally and continue to be subject to selective pressure. The natural habitat of poplar is in the highly dynamic riparian ecosystem in which successful genotypes will have developed strategies to deal with fluctuating water tables, silting and flooding. If such systems could be conserved, they would offer the best place to look for adaptive traits as a source for tree breeding.Relict populations remain threatened by competition for land use (White 1993). The introduction of cultivars and hybrids, over almost two centuries, means that young specimens may contain genes which are foreign to the local type. Therefore, one strategy is to take cuttings from older individuals to keep in ex situ genebanks either as stool-beds, or to grow into mature trees.Where actively breeding populations still exist, relatively free from genetic pollution from imported stock, it may be possible to establish an in situ reserve of much greater value, in that new successful combinations of genes through natural selection and new mutations are still emerging.In the absence of clear information about the genetic make-up of a given population, and about the origins of these genes, it is difficult to be clear about whether the population is \"native\" or not. Using analysis of chloroplast DNA, Ferris et al. (1997) were able to distinguish an East Anglian population of pedunculate oak from the many introduced specimens, and also found a marker which distinguished eastern and western European populations of both species of oak. This also showed that a number of very old oaks in Britain were in fact introductions from eastern Europe. Thus it is difficult to define the boundaries of a block of genetic material which is to be conserved, unless we can be clear about its taxonomic boundaries based upon molecular genetic information.Riparian systems are characterized by enormous ecological gradients along their length, and by rapid and dramatic changes in environment caused by flooding or by changes in the course of the river, by snow melts and by debris carried down by the river. This is the habitat to which poplars are specifically adapted, regenerating on elevated shingle-bars and mudflats in the braided streams of meandering rivers. The intense selection pressures of this environment have moulded the genetic structures of the poplars which ultimately the river leaves behind in the relatively stable environment of the floodplain forest.An excellent description of this progression is given in Peterken and Hughes (1995). These authors subdivide floodplain woodlands into four types:1. Pioneer stands of fast-growing poplar and willow on recently deposited sand and shingle. 2. Alder-dominated mixtures in peaty depressions in extinct channels and backswamps. 3. Mixed elm, oak, ash and alder with scattered poplar and willow on well-drained mineral soil, sometimes flooded in winter. 4. Oak, hornbeam and lime woodland on the floodplain margins.Evolution of diseases, disease resistance and biocontrol agents, and adaptations to site and climate make these systems a rich source of genetic material for biological study or as a source for tree breeding.\"River margin ecosystems offer a dynamic interface between terrestrial and aquatic systems where biological processes and biodiversity tend to be maximised. Recent evidence suggests that river margin ecosystems are highly sensitive to global, regional and local environmental changes\" (introduction to ERMAS II). If we learn how to monitor dynamic processes in riparian ecosystems, this might give us a sensitive barometer with which to assess the effects of climate change.The priority for conservation will be to conserve actively reproducing populations, in a habitat which is as 'natural' as possible, that is an in situ population subject to the selection pressures of an uncontrolled river system. In the following table, value to genetic conservation declines from types 1 to 4:In situ 1. Natural stands 3. Relict populationsWe begin with a relatively poor understanding of the genetic diversity of black poplar. The origins of the taxon are unclear, and we have little understanding of how the subspecies have differentiated, and hence where to look for the extreme genotypes within the species. Did populations of black poplar become isolated during the last ice age? Is subspecies betulifolia in Britain distinct from the same subspecies on the continent? To what extent is betulifolia distinct from subspecies typica?The dynamics of poplar populations has been considered by Robert Farmer in Chapter 2 of liThe Biology of Populus\" (Stettler et al. 1996). He contrasts opposing processes of genetic drift and genetic 'communication' over long distances. Poplar is specialized for rapid genetic adaptation because of the following traits:• dioecious sexual system • small, effectively wind-distributed seed/pollen borne in high crowns • early sexual maturity.It exhibits strong clinal patterns of variation for photoperiodism with latitude, for frost hardiness and for drought tolerance, for example. Farmer concludes:• geneflow has been sufficient to prevent genetic drift -geographic variation is not usually the result of geographic isolation • adaptations are rapid and large • studies such as that showing the adaptation of aspen to damaging low-level ozone (Berrang et al. 1986(Berrang et al. , 1989) ) point to dynamic processes that could not be elucidated simply by assessing variation in genebanks or by molecular genetic surveys. It is necessary to study dynamic processes in action in sexually reproducing populations.Modern molecular methods for analyzing genetic material now offer means for examining genetic diversity and defining relationships between individual taxa. Legionnet (1997) used isoenzymes to examine genetic diversity and population biology in P. nigra growing in France and found that there was more genetic diversity within rather than between stands. As a consequence, it would be more efficient to conserve more individuals from a small number of stands than vice versa. Cottrell et al. (1997) used RAPD markers to study 36 accessions of black poplar broadly sampled within Great Britain and found only 17 distinct genotypes. Genotypes were local in their distribution and genetic diversity was low. These authors also concluded that there had been so much interference by humans that there are unlikely to be distinct eastern and western types. In a more concentrated study of black poplar in the Upper Severn area, Winfield et al. (in prep.) used AFLP analysis to examine genetic diversity in 146 individuals and 3 individuals considered to be non-betulifolia poplars. Genetic diversity was low, confirming the results of Cottrell et al. (1997). There was a general correlation between geographic proximity and genetic similarity. They concluded that it was possible to identify a small number of individuals exhibiting maximum diversity for inclusion in a replanting/conservation programme.Of the 36 trees sampled by Cottrell et al. (1997), only 6 were female and DNA analysis of these revealed that there were only two distinct genotypes, despite the fact that they were sampled from a wide geographic range.The ERMAS I programme was established in 1992 to increase our understanding of the processes controlling the structure and function of European river margin ecosystems through a Europe-wide network. ERMAS II focuses on the role of biodiversity in determining the sensitivity of river margin ecosystems to environmental conditions, particularly temperature and hydrology. There are three main tasks:• to understand the role of biodiversity in maintaining the structure, function and stability of ecosystems • to analyze ecosystem processes with particular reference to the organic matter cycle • to determine and compare interactions and links between ecosystem processes and physical processes in contrasting situations, defined on two scales: climatic region and patch.The study sites range from 64°N to 43°N, with a climatic gradient from subpolar to maritime temperate, Mediterranean and temperate continental. Partnership details for this and the following EU shared-cost project can be obtained from the Internet via CORDIS (on-line information service about the activities of the European Community concerning research and development).The full title of this project is \"Floodplain biodiversity and restoration: hydrological and geomorphological mechanisms influencing flooplain diversity and their application to the restoration of European floodplains.\" The main objectives are:• to contribute to the development of a scientific methodology for determining the flow needs of riparian plant communities on selected European floodplains • to create effective links between the scientific understanding of the functioning of riparian ecosystems and the institutional mechanisms by which river management for conservation and restoration occur.The main activities are: 1. To identify and quantify hydrological and sedimentological conditions favoured by riparian species for their establishment and growth. Using black poplar in the UK and France, and alder and willow in Sweden, field and laboratory experiments are investigating species' response, e.g. to waterlogging and drought. 2. To link contemporary floodplain patterns to our understanding of past climatic and land-use changes at a catchment scale and over a range of time scales. Archival studies of river flows and management practices will be linked to studies of catchment-scale riparian vegetation patterns and land-use practices. 3. To investigate the institutional framework within which river restoration projects take place and the degree to which knowledge of the functioning of floodplain ecosystems influences their implementation. An inventory of restoration projects across the European Community will be made, and the institutional frameworks involved and their knowledge of the functioning of floodplain ecosystems will be studied in the UK, Sweden and France.Against this background, it is possible to identify two broad areas of research need:1. Studies of genetic diversity and genetic origins of black poplar, designed to guide ex situ conservation strategies, and in particular to increase the efficiency of those strategies by identifying individuals to conserve. 2. Studies of adaptation and ecological dynamics in in situ populations, concentrating on breeding populations subject to the selection pressures in dynamic river systems. For instance, it will be important to decide how large such populations need to be to conserve the ecological and genetic processes which give rise to valuable new genetic combinations.NuriaAlba Area de Selvicultura y Mejora Genetica, INIA, 28080 Madrid, SpainA code to identify the stand starting with the acronym of the Institute. The conservation of genetic resources requires a detailed knowledge of the underlying genetic variation that causes the diversity we observe in a species. We need to know, for example, whether populations that we find in the field are very diverged from each other or not, or whether individuals within one population are very similar to each other or not. Practical measures of conservation can be based on this information, e.g. which clones to include in collections of P. nigra, how to restore close-to-nature poplar stands, and so on.While the assessment of visible traits is often straightforward, we do not always know about their inheritance. Genetic markers as revealed by biochemical techniques, on the other hand, allow the direct study of genes of the species. An overview on DNA marker technologies has recently been given by Karp et al. (1997), and in more detail by Westman and Kresovich (1997). Hayward and Sackville Hamilton's (1997) chapter deals with the interaction of population structure, as measured by molecular markers, and conservation matters. In this short overview, laboratory tests for inherited traits that (i) distinguish between P. nigra and other Populus species and hybrids (introgression), (ii) allow an assessment of genetic diversity within P. nigra, and (iii) distinguish different clones, will be discussed.Genes and their alleles -encoded in chromosomal DNA -influence phenotypic traits by directing the production of RNA and proteins within the cells. Besides the chromosomes, mitochondria and chloroplasts in plants also contain a small amount of DNA. Flavell and Moore (1996) have recently given a very useful introduction to the organization of plant DNA and the components of plant genomes. Genes are strings of on average a few thousand DNA building blocks (nucleotides). There are four different nucleotides. To be translated into protein sequence, each triplet of nucleotides of the 'coding' parts of a gene codes for a specific amino acid (or a signal is given to the translation machinery of the cell), so that the DNA sequence determines the protein structure by way of determining the exact amino acid sequence of that protein. Allelic variants of a given gene differ by a small number of changes in nucleotide sequence that sometimes cause a different amino acid to be incorporated into the protein. This subtle change may alter the protein's physiological behaviour, or its metabolic properties, or simply its mobility in an electrophoresis gel. As there is redundancy in the coding of amino acids by nucleotide triplets (different triplets code for the same amino acid -there are 64 possible triplets, but only 20 different amino acids), the variation may only be present in the DNA, but not in the protein.To analyze which genetic variants are present in an individual, one could in principle look at (i) the metabolites produced by the proteins encoded by a given gene, (ii) the proteins, or (iii) the chromosomal DNA, (iv) the chromosomes. Below, examples of such analyses in Populus, especially P. nigra, and their respective merits and problems will be mentioned.Chromosomal DNA inheritance follows Mendel's laws. This implies that alleles of both poplar parent species will be present in first generation hybrids, but segregation will occur in later generations and backcrosses. In contrast, chloroplasts and mitochondria seem to be inherited from the female mother tree in most angiosperms.In this paper, 'biochemical markers' will refer to metabolites of the cell other than DNA, RNA and proteins, while the term 'molecular' will refer to the latter three classes. Boritz (1962) analyzed leaf juice of pure Papulus species and hybrids on large paper chromatograms. He was able to differentiate sections and species, but there was insufficient resolution in the P. x euramericana clones. His observations were semiquantitative for several compounds, which makes their application in introgression studies more complicated. He also introduced two-dimensional chromatograms for enhanced resolution. A number of papers report on hybrid classification using paper chromatography. For instance, Eckenwalder (1982) established the hybrid contribution of P. nigra to some spontaneous trees in North America using similar methods. Malvolti et al. (1991) were able to differentiate between species and some groups of hybrids, but not between clones, in a study of controlled crosses of P. delta ides x P. nigra. Again, twodimensional chromatograms were involved. Greenaway et al. (1991) have published extensively on the use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for Papulus hybrid identification. A list of references on analyses of leaf and bud exudates is available from the author.Summarizing these studies, it was often possible to differentiate hybrids and pure species, although it was not always possible to find the correct parents for a given hybrid. While there was some variation within species, hybrids with identical parent species often could not be distinguished from each other on the basis of the chromatograms. Moreover, none of the authors attempted to assign single phenolic compounds to the action of particular genes. However, the methods are quick and convenient, and no sophisticated instrumentation is needed for paper and thin layer chromatography.Isoenzyme analysis has been applied in a number of Papulus studies (Table 1). A number of staining protocols are available that have permitted the analysis of up to 30 loci in some studies. They served for studying clone distinction, species distinction, introgression and genetic variation within a species. However, different purposes may require the application of different enzyme systems (Table 1).Comparing results from different laboratories reveals important discrepancies in some cases -for instance introgression analysis with P. delta ides (Table 2). In several cases, authors directly contradict each other -GOT-4/ AAT-B, 6PGDH, PGM and MDH are examples. Sometimes this may be due to limited numbers of individuals of one species available. In most cases, laboratories in North America have access only to a limited number of P. nigra clones (Raj ora 1989a), while European laboratories are not able to sample P. deltaides extensively. Consequently, rare variants in one of the species may be missed, and wrong conclusions about mutually exclusive alleles may be drawn. This dilemma, in principle, applies to any marker type (see Discussion). Nevertheless, from Table 2 it appears that authors agree on the usefulness of locus LAP-A(l) for introgression analysis. At this locus, JanBen (pers. comm.) has recently detected additional alleles, including a null-allele. Other loci that have not been tested as widely include ACO-2(b) and DIA-a(2). For locus PGM-1(A) it appears that gel resolution in Rajora (1989a) was insufficient while mutually exclusive allelic bands at this locus were resolved by JanBen (1997) on starch and by Malvolti et al. (1991) on polyacrylamide gels. There is no consensus on the use of the 6PGDH enzyme system. PospiSkova et al. (1997) have also addressed the issue of introgression of the male ornamental hybrid 'Berolinensis' into P. nigra with isoenzymes.JanBen (pers. comm.) has analyzed offspring of controlled crosses among P. nigra and P. x euramericana for segregation of the variants in introgression constellations.Frequencies in accordance with Mendel's law were obtained. This means that with a limited number (4) of markers available, a small proportion of offspring (6.25%) will show P. nigra markers only, although derived from a P. nigra with P. x euramericana mating. Legionnet and Lefevre (1996) raised the possibility of selection against introgressed seedlings in later years, so that gene frequencies may shift away from theoretical predicted ones over time.Analyses of genetic variation within a single species, and the use of isoenzymes to differentiate between clones, are less controversial. A number of enzyme systems and loci have been found useful (Table 1). For instance, Rajora and Zsuffa (1989) found identical genotypes for 31 loci for the two clones, 'Ostia' and 'Canada Blanc'. For the origin of 'Canada Blanc', they cite \"selected in Spain\". 'Ostia' provoked some doubt in the extensive morphological analyses conducted by R. Muller before 1962 in Germany (Muller andSauer 1957-1961). It was concluded that 'Ostia' was indistinguishable from the Spanish clone 'Pinseque'. From this it appears that indeed 'Canada Blanc' was a selection from the original 'Pinseque' clone in the same way as 'Ostia', which was brought to Germany by a forester, on pilgrimage in Rome, visiting Ostia, in the Holy Year of 1925 (Muller andSauer 1957-1961). Rajora (1990a) and Muller-Starck (1992) tested for linkage among isoenzyme loci in controlled crosses. While Rajora (1990a) was unable to detect any linkages in the material available, Muller-Starck's (1992) crosses revealed linkage groups GOT-A with GOT-B, NADH-DH-A with PGM-A, and IDH-B and 6PGDH-D with PGI-B. Among the latter, two loci called GPI(=PGI)-2 and IDH-1 also formed a weakly linked group in the basket willow (Salix viminalis L.; Thorsen et al. 1997). Linked loci may prove versatile in introgression studies, for instance with var. 'Italica', because in case of a significant contribution of its pollen to P. nigra offspring, linkage disequilibrium is expected among linked loci.In conclusion, isoenzymes are useful for both introgression analyses and the study of genetic diversity in Populus. Comparison of results between laboratories remains controversial as far as banding patterns are concerned, while derived parameters of genetic diversity are on a comparable scale (Legionnet and Lefevre 1996).Historically, one of the first techniques to study relationships between related species with DNA was DNA-DNA hybridization. DNA was extracted from both species, heated up to separate the two DNA strands of molecules, then both species' DNAs were mixed and slowly cooled down again. The closer the species were related, the quicker the double strands formed again, which can be monitored by a change in absorbency in a spectrometer. While this method is outdated nowadays, it might be interesting to use with the hybrids and backcrosses in P. nigra, because not just single genes but the whole genome would be assessed. One practical difficulty is the need for standardization of the relative amounts of chloroplast and chromosome DNA in the samples (chloroplast DNA is presumably more similar between both species than nuclear DNA). 1981;2=Rajora 1989a2=Rajora , 1989b2=Rajora , 1989c2=Rajora , 1990a2=Rajora , 1990b;;Rajora and Dancik 1992a;3=Malvolti et al. 1991;4=JanBen 1997;5=Pospfskova et al. 1997;6=Weber and Stettler 1981;7=Liu and Furnier 1993;8=Legionnet and Lefevre 1996;9=Muller-Starck 1992. A similar modern approach is slot blot hybridization. DNA to be tested is made single stranded and bound to a nylon filter in spots. DNA from pure species is labelled with radioactivity or with a colour-producing marker chemical, then incubated with the filter. Darkening of a photographic film or colour development indicates how much of this labelled DNA has been bound by the DNA on the filter. The relative amounts of signal from the pure species may be compared with the overall contribution of the parent species to a hybrid's genome. While this kind of analysis has been applied to other hybrid problems, it has never been applied in Populus. Again, the chloroplast DNA -nuclear DNA ratio would have to be standardized.Chloroplasts can be separated from nuclei by density gradient centrifugation, and subsequently, pure chloroplast and chromosome DNA fractions can be obtained. Such chloroplast DNA can be cut into defined pieces by restriction enzymes, which cut DNA only at specific base sequences of 4-8 nucleotides. These pieces of DNA can be separated in an electrophoresis gel (agarose) and made visible. Different species will show different patterns. The same type of analysis is not possible with chromosome DNA because after restriction with commonly used enzymes, there are so many different fragments of similar lengths that single restricted DNA fragments cannot normally be separated by current electrophoresis techniques.To make such single fragments visible among the whole background of other sequences, or to do chloroplast analysis without chloroplast isolation, techniques called RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) and Southern hybridization are used. The whole load of fragments which appears as a smear after DNA electrophoresis is transferred to a nylon filter and incubated with a defined piece of DNA. This DNA carries a radioactive or colour-producing marker again. The DNA will stick to the smear only where it finds a complementary sequence among the DNA restriction fragments. Dark spots in the case of radioactivity or a coloured band in the other case show how far this matching fragment had moved.The source of the probing DNA can be single, separated DNA molecules from the species (chloroplast, nuclear, mitochondrial) which are multiplied in bacteria. Most often, further information from these sequences is not available. Sometimes the functions of these sequences are known, e.g. they are known genes that code for certain proteins. One can also try and use sequences with known identity from other, related species. For instance, many probes developed from one Populus species will work in many others as well; some probes will work across different genera.A recent discovery in molecular biology is that DNA can be multiplied in a way similar to what happens in cell division, without using living cells, but only a single enzyme. This polymerase enzyme uses short pieces of DNA that bind complementary to a longer strand and supplies further nucleotides to elongate the missing strand of DNA from the starter (\"primer\") onwards. Primers can be synthesized chemically. If primer sites are known within a relatively short distance from each other, on the opposite strands of a DNA double strand, the enzyme will copy both strands. These can be separated from each other again, and primers may bind again. The enzyme will copy again, and this time, there will be (almost) 4 times as many DNA fragments as in the beginning. Further rounds of copying will yield so much of this single sort of DNA that it can be visualized in an electrophoresis gel without the use of probes and radioactivity or dyes. This is called the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCRr The procedure is simple: all necessary reaction components are mixed in a reaction tube, and the tube is put into an automated heating block that drives the amplification reaction by. shifting between appropriate temperatures for DNA double strand separation, primer binding, and enzyme activity for 25-50 cycles. Anonymous or known genes or DNA fragments can be analyzed depending on which primers are selected: ones that bind specifically only to one or a few spots on the DNA, or ones that bind in a more random fashion and yield more fragments.Isolation and digestion of pure chloroplast or mitochondrial DNA is hardly being carried out anymore. However, it helped in establishing the approximate size of the Papulus chloroplast DNA molecule -150-156 kilobasepairs (Sabsch 1992), and that both cell organelles are inherited from the mother in species hybridizations (Mejnartowicz 1991;Sabsch 1992). Chloroplast and mitochondria isolation requires a lot of work and would present an obstacle if large numbers of plant samples are to be analyzed. This kind of analysis has been replaced by RFLP-Southern hybridization analysis because the latter does not require the isolation of cell organelles. Such chloroplast studies were done by a number of authors in Papulus (Table 3). Smith and Sytsma (1990) and Rajora and Dancik (1992b, 1995a, 1995b, 1995c) used cloned chloroplast fragment of Petunia as probes. Smith and Sytsma (1990) found no interspecific variation, neither between P. nigra var. 1talica', P. nigra var. 'betulifolia' (Pursh) Torr. and two other clones, nor between P. delta ides subsp. manilifera Eckenw. and P. deltaides subsp. delta ides (1 clone each). They also calculated that the P. nigra chloroplast genome was more closely related to P. alba, which challenges currently accepted taxonomic treatments. They invoked hybridization and chloroplast capture as a possible explanation. Mejnartowicz (1991) tested controlled crosses involving clones 'Muhle Larsen', 'Androscoggin', 'Oxford' and 'Columbia River'. She could establish the maternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA in these crosses. She later extended the investigations and provided data for a phylogenetic comparison (Sabsch 1992). She found intraspecific variation at a low level in P. trichacarpa. Her dendrograms show completely differing results in dependence of the enzymes used: EcoRV and PstI place P. nigra and P. deltaides next to each other, but when the whole data set is included, a specific artefact of the clustering technique ('chaining', Dunn and Everitt 1982) makes the two mentioned species appear basal to the balsam poplars. Rajora and Dancik (1992b) confirmed maternal chloroplast inheritance for P. delta ides x P. nigra and P. deltoides x P. maximawiczii crosses and extended the work to intraspecific crosses in P. deltaides. Again, chloroplast DNA of offspring was identical to the maternal parent. Vornam et al. (1994) and Rajora and Dancik (1995a, 1995b, 1995c) compared P. nigra and P. deltaides more comprehensively. Vornam et al. (1994) found a specific marker that distinguishes between the two species' chloroplast types. No intraspecific variation was found. Seven out of 26 mature trees presumed to be P. nigra showed P. delta ides chloroplast types. Rajora and Dancik (1995a) established clearly that there are indeed intraspecific chloroplast DNA variations for both P. nigra and P. delta ides, and also for P. maximawiczii. They attributed this to 'varieties' of different geographical origin. In P. deltaides var. 'deltoides', variation was found between clones of the same variety. In P. nigra, var. 1talica' was different from the other clones. Interestingly, despite the fact that the probes used in Rajora and Dancik (1992b, 1995a, 1995b, 1995c) cover the region of the psbC-psbD probe used by Vornam et al. (1994), the reported fragment sizes do not match for enzyme XbaI which produced the polymorphism in Vornam et al. (1994).Rajora and Dancik (1995b) analyzed 17 P. x euramericana clones which had chloroplast types indistiguishable from or similar to P. deltaides var. 'deltoides', suggesting that the latter variety served as maternal parent in the 'ancient' hybrid poplar clones in Europe. A 1990) Mejnartowicz (1991) Sabsch (1992) Rajora and Dancik (1992b) Vornam et al. (1994) Rajora and Dancik (1995 a, 1995b, 1995c The high degree of sequence conservation of the chloroplast genes between different plant species has enabled the design of PCR primers that can be used in many species, almost 'universally' (Taberlet et al. 1991;Demesure et al. 1995;Dumolin-Lapegue et al. 1997). Such primers are often placed in such a way that the spacer DNA stretches so that separate genes are amplified. Spacers are not under the same high selection pressure as the genes, so they show a higher mutation rate. DNA sequence variation in these regions can be revealed by observation of length differences in electrophoresis, by mutations at restriction enzyme recognition sites, or by a combination of both (Demesure et al. 1996). Many small length differences can be analyzed in simple agarose gels, making the method amenable to analyses of large numbers of samples.We have analyzed approx. 18 kbp (10 regions) in P. nigra (up to 60 clones), P. deltoides (up to 10 clones), two artificial crosses between the two species, and commercial hybrids including members of section Tacamahaca (up to 110 clones). For some spacers, up to 11 restriction enzymes were tested. Many spacer regions were monomorphic. In the polymorphic spacers (three regions), four restriction site mutations mostly corresponded with length-variable stretches of DNA. One region (ORF62-trnG) was particularily polymorphic, with inter-and intraspecific polymorphisms and a nearby length variation in var. 1talica' clustering together (Heinze 1998;the var. 1talica' polymorphisms were also observed by F. Lefevre, pers. comm.). The analysis of another region (trnT-trnD) is now used routinely as one test for hybrid poplar introgression with P. nigra.To achieve a coverage of the whole chloroplast genome with the PCR method, many single analyses are necessary: for approx. 150 kbp (containing a repeat of approx. 25 kbp) analyzed in pieces of 1.5 kbp at a time, between 80 and 85 reactions. However, it is not necessary to analyze the genes themselves, so this number may actually decrease. Furthermore, if a number of spacers known to be more polymorphic are analyzed, a high degree of resolution may be achieved. Mainly because of its amenity to large sample numbers and automatization, in the long run this method will replace RFLP-Southern hybridization analysis at least for chloroplasts, and maybe also for mitochondria (Demesure et al. 1995;Dumolin-Lapegue et al. 1997).Ribosomes, structures in living cells that are the site of protein synthesis, consist mainly of a number of ribosomal RNAs. These are encoded in special genes (rRNA genes or rDNA) that are highly conserved in structure and sequence. The 18S, 5.8S and 25S RNA genes are arranged in one block. Up to several hundred such blocks are tandemly repeated, separated by an intergenic spacer (IGS). These big gene complexes are found at either one or more than one chromosomal location. In the latter case, loci of different 'size' (repeat number) may be present. Major rDNA loci are associated with the so-called nucleolus-organizing regions. The SS RNA is also tandemly arranged, but in different blocks. Evolutionary mechanisms that are important for the rDNAs include unequal crossing-over which creates variation, and gene conversion and homogenization of sequences within and between loci which counteracts and slows down evolution. Some of the copies may become nonfunctional pseudo-genes which then have higher mutation rates. The overall number of rRNA genes in a genome can vary over the generations in response to environmental effects. Because of all these features, genetic interpretation of rDNA variation is not straightforward. Rather, rDNA lends itself to taxonomic studies. In other plant genera, variation in the IGS region, sometimes also within the genes, has been utilized to construct a phylogeny of the species. . . , . Smith and Sytsma (1990) reported on rDNA RFLP analysis in Papulus which allowed them to compare phylogenies for nuclear rDNA and chloroplast DNA. Procedural difficulties reduced the size of their data set: incomplete restriction digestion with Pst I occurred, and length variation in IeS had to be ignored. Length variation (insertions/ deletions), however, is often correlated with restriction site mutation, for instance in the poplar chloroplast DNA (Heinze 1998). Their main finding is that P. nigra assumes a position between section Leuce and a cluster made of P. delta ides and two balsam poplars.No restriction map is given in the paper. In the light of later findings of several rDNAs in one species as discussed below, their analysis would need revision.D 'Ovidio et al. (1990'Ovidio et al. ( , 1991;;D'Ovidio 1992) studied the structure of rDNA in eight Papulus species. They found variation between and within species. The ribosomal RNA genes made up approximately 2.4% of the DNA of a cell. Therefore, observation of certain fragments directly on agarose (after restriction with enzyme SstI) allowed an assignment of clones to species, or identification of parental species in some hybrids. Major and minor variants of rDNAs were observed within species. Hybrids inherited the variants from both parent species. Faivre-Rampant et al. (1992) also constructed restriction maps for several rDNAs of five Papulus species, using some restriction enzymes identical to those in the former studies. The restriction maps for the 18S-5.8S-25S unit coincide, but new variants are reported for the IeS regions. While the authors constructed a phylogenetic tree for the different gene variants on the basis of these data, this cannot be taken as a clue to poplar taxonomy because of gene conversion and homogenization which increase the number of reversals of character states (i.e. different rDNA loci or genes within a species do not necessarily evolve independently). A simple test -EcaRI digestion and probing with a whole rDNA unit -correctly identified P. nigra, P. deltaides and first generation hybrid clones. Stoehr and Singh (1993) published a restriction map of P. balsamifera which largely coincides with the former maps in the coding regions. They also report on length and possible methylation variation in a population sample of P. balsamifera. From their Figure 4 (Stoehr and Singh 1993) it appears that more than two alleles may be present in an individual.An explanation for the complicated patterns of inheritance of rDNA in Papulus was presented by Prado et al. (1996). They hybridized rDNA probes with chromosomes on microscopic slides to detect the number of rDNA loci within several species. One major and one minor locus were found for both P. nigra and P. delta ides, but their hybrids had one major and two minor loci. This suggests that the minor loci of the two species are not situated at corresponding chromosomal positions. Papulus balsamifera showed two major and one minor locus, P. alba only one locus. Two loci were found for the 5S rDNA in all species.'Universal' peR primers have also been described for the rDNA genes (White et al. 1990); however, these amplifiy the spacers within the unit and not the more variable IeS (which for many plant species is too long for routine peR amplification).DNA quality and quantity requirements may hamper the broad application of the methods outlined above for quick detection of variation within and between (introgression) species. Further studies are necessary to pinpoint peR primers to the regions of the rDNAs that account for the variability.The following other sources of DNA probes have been used in Papulus: anonymous fragments from poplar cloned in bacteria, heterologous probes from other species, and specific poplar genes of known function. Keim et al. (1989) used the first kind of probes in a study that could prove unidirectional introgression in a P. angustifalia -P. fremantii hybrid swarm. Bradshaw et al. (1994) constructed a genetic linkage map of a P. delta ides -P. trichacarpa pedigree with all three probe sources.Establishing genetic control and allelism for the variants is usually not complicated in this kind of RFLP analysis. Keim et al. (1989) could establish species-specific markers in their study. Estimates of genetic diversity can also be derived provided that allelism is clarified, which is the case for most single-locus and also some other probes. In most cases, all the variants will be visible in the analysis (complete codominance). The drawback again is the workload for studies involving the screening of many (50+) individuals.peR of anonymous sequences RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) has become very popular shortly after its introduction in 1990 (Welsh and McClelland 1990;Williams et al. 1990). PCR is applied with a single short 10-base primer. At low stringency conditions for primer binding, a number of DNA fragments are amplified from genomic DNA. After electrophoresis, some of these fragments are absent from some individuals on genetic causes. RAPD consequently detects 'presence' and 'absence' alleles for a locus characterized by the size of a DNA band. 'Presence' is dominant over 'absence', hence low-frequency 'absence' alleles remain undetected.The procedure is quite simple and quick. DNA isolations can be rather crude compared with RFLP analysis (Heinze 1994), but poor DNA quality may lead to artefactual variation. In RAPD analysis, a small quantity of this DNA is subjected to PCR with one or more short RAPD primers, and the resulting fragments are resolved on agarose gels (polyacrylamide gels may be used if higher resolution is desired).For the interpretation of results (comparisons of banding patterns), classical genetic parameters used in isoenzyme and RFLP analysis are only applicable after imposing some assumptions on the data mainly because of the dominance problem: primers should not be pre-selected (Clark and Lanigan 1993), and large population samples are necessary to correctly estimate underlying allele frequencies (Lynch and Milligan 1994). Seemingly monomorphic fragments may disguise low-frequency 'absence' alleles in the sample, so the number of individuals required to represent a population is quite high (Lynch and Milligan 1994). Alternatively, other ways of estimating diversity from RAPD data can be tried, for instance the (statistical) comparison of the distribution of genetic distances calculated within different populations from RAPD data (Triest et al. 1997), but these may not allow a direct comparison with isoenzyme analyses. The AMOVA method (analysis of molecular variance) of Excoffier et al. (1992) partitions genetic variation into betweenand within-population. components. It was developed for haplotype data, e.g. mitochondrial RFLP types, and RAPD data do not correspond to some of the basic assumptions. Huff et al. (1993) nevertheless found it useful in RAPD data analysis. An adaptation of the method for RAPD data was introduced by Stew art and Excoffier (1996). They assumed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and corrected for a degree of selfing in the population estimated with other data (e.g. isoenzymes). Liu and Furnier's (1993) estimates of RAPD genetic differentiation in aspens (P. trernuloides and P. grandidentata), assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, differed markedly from those using isoenzyme or RFLP data. Tuskan et al. (1996) based their analysis of P. trernuloides populations on a similarity index and clustering. Clustering is a much-used way of analyzing RAPD data. The clustering process, however, reduces the complexity of the data set, which may lead to loss of information and artefacts. For example, clustering is dependent on the choice of similarity index, choice of clones or species studied, selection of bands (monomorphic ones sometimes excluded) and other factors. A common phenomenon is 'chaining' where similarity values at the extremes of a continuous distribution form nuclei of clustering that may lead to erroneous results (Dunn and Everitt 1982). In hybridization and introgression studies, the application of clustering suffers from some theoretical drawbacks: what is the expected outcome of a clustering study involving hybrids and both of their parent species? First generation hybrids, in theory, should exhibit equal average distances to both parents, which hampers the use of a cluster dendrogram as a 'relationship tree'.Populus nigra in particular has not often been studied by RAPD up to the present. Castiglione et al. (1993) included one clone (l Pourtet,) in an exploratory analysis of several important breeding clones. Wang et al. (1996) used this method to discover genomic changes in plants derived from tissue culture and after genetic transformation.Studies in other Populus species described clone identification (Un et al. 1994), estimation of genetic variation within and between populations (Uu and Furnier 1993; Chong et al. 1994; Yeh et al. 1995; Tuskan et al. 1996), the identification of genotypes in P. tremula stands (Bueno et al. 1997) and phylogenetic relationships (Su et al. 1996). The use of RAPD analysis for phylogenetics is highly controversial (Backeljau et al. 1995;van de Zande and Bijlsma 1995). In breeding programmes, Bradshaw et al. (1994) and Bradshaw and Stettler (1995) included RAPD markers in a genetic linkage map of P. trichocarpa x P. deltoides hybrids. Villar et al. (1996) identified RAPD markers useful in pinpointing a genomic region involved in rust resistance in the same cross.Strengths of the RAPD assay include that only minute DNA quantities are necessary, although DNA quality is rather important. No prior information (e.g. DNA sequences) or prior work (e.g. DNA probe isolation) is required, and handling is rather simple. The high number of studied loci usually possible in RAPD often compensates for some of the shortcomings in a sense that more loci give a more accurate representation of the whole genome. The most important application in Populus genetic variation studies is clone differentiation. Patterns of multiple bands in a lane make up a kind of 'genetic fingerprint' characteristic for individual clones. One caveat is that such an analysis should be done as a side-by-side comparison. Artefactual variation inherent to the RAPD procedure will make database comparisons of banding patterns problematic. AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism, Vos et al. 1995) combines some of the strengths of RFLP and RAPD analyses. Genomic DNA is cut with restriction enzymes. To the end of the fragments, short pieces of DNA are 'glued' (ligated). The sequence of these short adaptors is complementary to PCR primers that then amplify a subset of the restriction fragments. Careful choice of restriction enzymes, primers and detectable labels on the primers reduces the complexity of fragments seen on an electrophoresis gel. Large polyacrylamide gels are necessary to resolve the many bands that appear. AFLP analysis, similar to RAPD, yields a number of polymorphisms from a single analysis run. Sometimes, heterozygotes are identified by bands of half the intensity of homozygotes. Still, it is not yet completely clear whether the method works as well for diverse genetic backgrounds as it does in pedigrees. Cervera et al. (1996a) identified three AFLP markers tightly linked to Melampsora resistance in a P. deltoides x P. nigra cross, and described applications in poplar breeding (Cervera et al. 1996b).Storme and Boerjan (pers. comm.) have collected material from a number of trees of var. 1talica' and compared their AFLP fingerprint patterns among them and in comparison with other P. nigra clones. While most of the var. 1talica' clones group together in cluster analysis by showing identical patterns, some trees show a lower congruence of patterns (approx. 90% only in some cases). This may be due to either somatic mutations accumulated in var. 1talica', or to procedural causes (a low-level reproducibility error rate). Winfield et al. (1998) have addressed this problem directly by including five duplicate samples in their study of AFLP diversity in P. nigra in the Upper Severn area (UK). Congruence between patterns in the duplicate tests was between 93 and 100%. A similar level was observed when sampled trees from the same field were . compared, so the conclusion is that these trees belong to the same clone (and that overall genetic diversity in the study area is very low).Some of the RAPD problems like bands originating from unrelated loci with similar electrophoretic mobility, or long-term reproducibility, may be less important in AFLP. The level of expertise required is a little higher than for RAPDs. Bradshaw et al. (1994) have determined partial DNA sequences from RFLP probes. PCR primers were designed on that basis. These primers amplified defined DNA fragments in .PCR which, after treatment with appropriate restriction enzymes and sometimes even without restriction, showed genetic polymorphisms in their P. delta ides -P. trichacarpa pedigree. They also demonstrated that several of the primer pairs are useful in amplifying defined DNA fragments from other poplar species. This approach is sometimes called 'sequence tagged sites' or STS. Legionnet et al. (1997) applied nine of these primer pairs in their study of sexual and asexual reproduction in P. nigra. Using several restriction enzymes, 44 polymorphic bands were revealed. These allowed the recognition of 50 different genotypes in 118 trees from a single stand.Faivre-Rampant et al. (1995, and pers. comm.) applied these markers to the study of phylogenetic relationships of P. nigra and P. deltaides. From their data, eight restriction fragments (bands) show highly differentiated distributions in P. nigra and P. deltaides, respectively: for instance, fragment 757a was absent only in one out of 206 P. nigra, while present in none of 11 P. delta ides clones analyzed. On the other hand, there were four bands typical of P. delta ides present in a single P. nigra individual, while absent from the remaining 205. Similarly, I have tested P. nigra, P. deltaides and a range of hybrids for the banding patterns of win3, one of the primer pairs developed by Bradshaw et al. (1994). The typical P. delta ides allele can easily be distinguished from the one typical for all other poplar species (P. nigra, P. trichacarpa, P. maximawiczii) analyzed to date, on agarose gels (Heinze 1997). The marker behaves in a Mendelian manner in controlled backcrosses to P. nigra. Presence of the P. delta ides allele in a few P. nigra seedlings is taken as an indication of low-level introgression.Concerning the use of these markers for introgression analysis, the same dilemma as stated for isoenzymes applies: the low-frequency or apparently absent alleles as described above may be products of ongoing introgression, but they may also be present at a very low frequency among 'true' members of the species in the form of polymorphisms. Wang et al. (1996) have used a microsatellite of P. nigra to analyze regenerants from tissue culture. The DNA sequence that amplified a product of approx. 140 bp showed extensive length variation. Recently, Rajora (1997) has introduced the analysis of microsatellites in P. tremulaides. Three microsatellite sequences could be amplified with primers designed from a total of 20 DNA fragments that hybridized to short tandem repeats. He could also show that these primer sequences are capable of amplifying DNA from P. nigra species. Microsatellites would serve best for the purpose of clone identification because the expected variability is higher than in any other marker type. It may be possible to compile databases for lab-to-Iab comparisons as the respective allele sizes alone (i.e. numbers) are all that are needed for comparisons.Papulus species have a nuclear DNA content of approx. 1.1 pg/nucleus (Wang and Hall 1995). Direct observation of chromosomes under the microscope does not normally reveal any polymorphisms; however probing chromosome spreads with appropriate DNA sequences have allowed the identification of the loci coding for the ribosomal RNA genes (see above; Prado et al. 1996). The hybridization patterns are useful in studying poplar hybrids as numbers and locations of these genes differ between species.There is no single ideal method for the genetic analysis of P. nigra. Different questions may demand the application of different methods of analysis. A systematic dilemma, however, concerns the application of markers for introgression studies: how to distinguish between rare genetic marker variants occurring in a species and introgression? In the words of Legionnet and Lefevre (1996): \"indeed the difficult point about distinguishing introgressed trees is that once an allele is rare in a species and common in the other, it is impossible to know if it belongs to the normal polymorphism of the first species or if the genotypes displaying this allele are introgressed\".We can only observe the status quo -rare or introgressed alleles or markers -and cannot wind back time to find out if this allele has always been there in a species or whether it has been introgressed only recently.Following is a simplified 'decision tree' that may serve useful for colleagues that intend to start up new studies. First, the aims of a study have to be clear. • What methods could be tried in one's own laboratory?• Are there other laboratories around for collaboration on more demanding analyses?What are the limits in cost and time?• Is there a necessity for start-up development or is it possible to start with a 'cookbook'? • Some methods require more financial input than others, some require more time, and some, both -what is the best in one's own particular situation?Is the study a one-time effort or is it planned to continuously analyze samples? Some methods require a side-by-side comparison which is not practical for long-term studies. In the latter case, methods that allow the compilation of databases (isoenzymes, STS, microsatellites) for comparisons are preferred.For pilot studies, isoenzymes are first choice. Protocols are easily adapted to different laboratory situations, and the body of literature on isoenzyme variation in plants allows a quick comparison of data.In-depth study: Also for studies involving higher sample numbers, isoenzymes serve well because of relatively low costs and the possibility to streamline and even automate some of the steps in the protocol. A sufficiently high number of loci should be studied (around 10 or more). Microsatellites, once they are available, would have the additional advantage of higher information content, but the start-up development and the higher level of expertise needed are major drawbacks. These are partially avoided in the analysis of known PCR fragments (STS), and in RAPD and AFLP analysis. The latter two methods, however, yield dominant markers, and additional information or assumptions on the biology of the species are necessary to arrive at parameters comparable to other studies. For instance, inbreeding cannot be estimated with dominant markers like RAPDs.Pilot studies: Analysis of phenolic compounds in leaves and buds is a very quick and simple technique which may answer many of the questions raised by possible hybridization, without involving sophisticated laboratory equipment in the case of thin layer chromatography. Application of a few isoenzyme or PCR markers, chloroplast and nuclear, serves the same purpose. RFLP methods for chloroplast and nuclear DNA, and genomic in situ hybridization, are still reasonably effective with lower number of plant samples to analyze.In-depth study: Detailed studies of introgression need to employ more than just a few markers. In fact, as many as possible should be applied, and nuclear and chloroplast markers should be combined appropriately. Most other techniques may prove too time-consuming for large sample numbers.Pilot studies: For a rough grouping of a limited number of individuals, isoenzymes may be employed, but RAPD is more effective in this kind of studies.In-depth study: If many plants are to be analyzed, AFLP and microsatellites may be more suitable than either of the two methods above because of the higher level of resolution, which in turn is paid for by increased handling requirements. Practically, once sample numbers beyond 100 are considered, this was where RAPD approached its limits in Legionnet et al. (1997) study. The low-level error rate of AFLPs (around 95% reliability) presents a theoretical drawback, but in practice, if a high ratio of the number of AFLP polymorphisms and the number of plants analyzed is maintained, a 95% similarity can safely be considered as identity.Pilot studies: If one or a few plants of unknown clonal identity are to be compared with a few known clones for identification, isoenzymes and RAPD will often yield the desired level of resolution. AFLPs will provide sufficient information with substantially less runs necessary.In-depth study: The more clones and plants involved, the more sophisticated markers have to be utilized. A combination of isoenzymes and PCR analysis of known nuclear DNAs may be useful in establishing a database for future reference. The suitability of AFLP markers for 'databasing' is as yet untested. Also, there is currently no way of distinguishing between somatic mutations and procedural errors in AFLP. Alternatively, microsatellites, once available, will serve the same purpose.Combinations of different methods may come closer to the ideal situation than just choosing one method that has its strengths in only one of several aspects of the planned study. For example, to resolve the genotypes present in a P. nigra stand, Legionnet et al. (1997) sequentially applied PCR of known fragments and then RAPD analysis because the first method alone could not give the desired answer due to lower discriminating power, but applying RAPDs to all the samples would have increased the workload substantially. Therefore, RAPD was only employed to differentiate genotypes not resolved by the first type of analysis.The University of Washington (Seattle, USA) is maintaining a computer site for Populus genetics which includes a lot of information on molecular biology, the Poplar Molecular Network. It can be reached over the Internet at: http://poplar2.cfr.washington.edu/. There is also an electronic mailing list where questions regarding poplar breeding and genetics can be sent to a large expert audience (for information, contact Carl G. Riches at the following address: poplar1.cfr.washington.edu). A hardcopy newsletter is distributed by Marc Villar of INRA Orleans (E-mail: vinra.fr).In the past, the black poplar natural populations (Papulus nigra L.) in Croatia were represented along the Mura, Drava, Sava and Danube rivers. By interventions in the environment, as well as by uncontrolled cutting, the populations of this species have been reduced to fragments, namely to individual trees. Nevertheless, even today along the main streams, the black poplar natural regeneration occurs. To what degree it is a pure European black poplar and to what degree the progeny has been \"contaminated\" by the genes of P. deltaides Bartr. is what this paper aims to discover on the basis of the morphological leaf characteristics in the generative progeny. During the past 80 years, intensive establishing of plantations of the poplar hybrids (P. x eurarnericana (Dode) Guinier) took place. In particular, the hybrid clone '1-214' was planted on large surface areas. This being a female clone whose flowering is synchronized with the domesticated Lombardy poplar male clone (P. nigra var. 1talica' (Duroi) Mnch.), a spontaneous hybridization between these two clones, as well as that of the clone '1-214' with the autochthonous European black poplar male trees, can be expected. A reciprocal, backcross interspecific hybridization is less likely to occur because the cross between P. nigra and P. delta ides is very difficult in the case where the European black poplar functions as a female parent but also because of a small number of male hybrids of Euramerican poplars present in the plantations. The progeny could also develop by spontaneous intraspecific hybridization of the autochthonous black poplar. It can be expected that the progeny of the '1-214' hybrid and the domesticated clone P. nigra var. 1talica', by its morphological characteristics, will be closest to the European black poplar with a phenotypical expression of rare properties, which will characterize P. deltaides as well. The variability of this type would suggest a hybrid character of the youngest populations of European black poplar.An attempt was made to determine the existence of introgression into the European black poplar natural populations on the basis of the modified leaf morphology in its progeny, with the simultaneous use of biochemical analyses (Ronald et al. 1973;Eckenwalder 1982Eckenwalder , 1984;;Hu et al. 1985;Rood et al. 1986;Rajora and Zsuffa 1990;Greenway et al. 1991;Bisoffi and Cagelli 1992). According to the research carried out so far in Europe, the European black poplar was found to be contaminated by the P. delta ides genes and therefore, to preserve its genetic resources, the selection and reproduction of autochthonous old trees was started (Bisoffi et al. 1987;Krstinic and Kajba 1994a, 1994b, 1996).The objective of this research was also to determine the efficiency of in situ conservation, as well as the possibility of selecting 'plus' individuals with superior performance in the generative progeny. According to the transgression variability, the progeny would present superiority for some economically important properties in relation to the European black poplar, also with better adaptation to site conditions. By cloning superior individuals, positive properties of parental species can be maintained.Leaf variability in black poplar was studied within individual adult trees by means of morphometric analysis of leaves from short and long shoots. As within one tree the leaf dimorphism has been determined, for the leaf variability analysis in the generative progeny we took leaves from the short shoots only. The analyzed material was compared with the leaf measurements on the short fertile shoots from one European black poplar tree (Papulus nigra) of about 200 years of age, one eastern cottonwood (P. delta ides Bartr.), a '618' ('Lux') clone, a '1-214' hybrid clone (P. x euramericana), as well as with measurements on the Lombardy poplar clone P. nigra var. 1talica'. Leaf samples were taken from a 3-year old generative progeny of black poplar in three locations close to the Sava river (Jarun, Zapresi6 1 and Zapresi6 2). The analysis included only sound, fully developed leaves, collected in mid-July. From each of the individual adult trees 50 leaves were analyzed, while the generative progeny sample represented 165-260 leaves taken from 33-52 plants per population. The properties measured were maximum leaf blade length, maximum leaf blade width, petiole length, leaf blade width at 1 cm from the leaf tip, distance between the leaf base and the leaf widest part, and a angle between the first lateral vein and the horizontal (Fig. 1). For the P. nigra, P. nigra var. 'Italica', P. delta ides and the clone P. x euramericana 'Neva', observations were made for the number of teeth on a length of 3 cm, from the leaf blade widest part to the leaf tip. In addition to these parameters, some of the typical leaf properties, namely shape of the leaf base, petiole colour and glands at the leaf blade base, were observed. t a = leaf blade length; b = leaf blade width; c = petiole length; d = angle between the first lateral vein and the horizontal; e = leaf blade width at 1 cm from the leaf tip; f = distance between the leaf's widest part and the leaf base; g = number of teeth on 3 cm of leaf margin length. \" SD = standard deviation, CV = coefficient of variation.Small leaf dimensions of generative progeny in three populations can be explained by the hypothesis that the male parent was the clone Lombardy poplar (P. nigra var. 1talica'), which has smaller leaves than the autochthonous black poplar. The extremes of variability range in the populations and in the Lombardy poplar were of 54 and 55 mm, respectively, in relation to P. nigra (75 mm), P. deltaides (95 mm) and P. x euramericana (84 mm).Papulus delta ides has the smallest mean angle value (28.8°), P. nigra has an angle of 52.3°, P. nigra var. 1talica' 51.8° and the 1-214' clone 43.4° (Table 1). Mean values for progeny populations are also higher than those for P. nigra, the populations Zapresi6 1 and 2 being again very homogeneous (57.3° and 57.7° respectively), while the Jarun population has a slightly lower mean value (56.0°). The lowest variability is shown by P. nigra (CV=9.6%) and P. nigra var. 1talica' (CV=10.5%). The CVs of progeny populations range from 13.9 to 14.5%."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0777237013.json b/main/part_2/0777237013.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d9448ad1e9304ddc397a0a93307b0bb99b03cbc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0777237013.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"96544f80d21fd1eb1d7b101a5fcfba19","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e9a8e7aa-2484-4960-b106-fb92691ba180/retrieve","id":"-202854331"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"11b153a3-9710-4cf3-aba4-7ee930c840a0","content":"Macedonian pine (Pinus peuce Grisb.) is a tree reaching up to 30-35 m in height and up to 50-60 cm in diameter, but certain individuals may reach a height of 42 m and a diameter of 1.20 m. The tree height of this species diminishes strongly near the upper forest limit and may even obtain shrub sizes.In stands, the crown is narrow, pyramid-like, with comparatively short and slightly ascending branches situated in whorls, of good self -pruning. Up to the age of 40-50 the bark is smooth, darkgreen or greenviolet, becomeing plate-like fissured and grey to grey-brown afterward. The branches are relatively thick, greenish while still young and later they become grey. The brachyblasts contain five fine needles each. These needles are grayish-green, 50-70 mm long and 1 mm wide.The male reproductive organs are aments of a cylindrical shape, on average 13 mm long and up to 3.5 mm wide, and yellow in colour. They are situated in groups of 10-15 at the bases of growing shoots. The cones have a two-year cycle of development. In the beginning they are green or greenish-violet with their scales closed and covered with resin granules. They mature in September -October of the second year when they reach lengths of 7 -18 cm and widths of 3-4 cm. The seeds are ovate, grey-brown, from 4.7-8.9 mm long and from 3.4-6.4 mm wide.In the beginning a Pinus peuce tree develops a wellformed, spindle-like, central root but its lateral root system gradually develops intensively thus penetrating deep into the soil and providing a high stability.These Technical Guidelines are intended to assist those who cherish the valuable Macedonian pine gene pool and its inheritance, through conserving valuable seed sources or use in practical forestry. The focus is on conserving the genetic diversity of the species at the European scale. The recommendations provided in this module should be regarded as a commonly agreed basis to be complemented and further developed for local, national or regional conditions. The Guidelines are based on the available knowledge of the species and on widely accepted methods for the conservation of forest genetic resources.Alexander H. The cold mountain climate and high air humidity are the most suitable conditions for Pinus peuce.Though it occurs naturally from 800-900 m up to 2300-2400 m altitude, its optimum is most often from 1600-1900 m altitude.Pinus peuce often occurs on mainly silicate terrains and, less often, on carbonate ones. Its wood is soft, light -with average specific gravity of 440 kg/m 3 , of homogenous structure, tight and durable. Pith is pale-yellowish and strongly resinous, core is reddish. Pinus peuce wood is highly valued in construction, furniture production, wood-carving and cooperage. It is extremely durable, as trees and logs which have been earthed up by torrential currents and have then remained in the ground for 10, 20 and even more years, are still good for usage.The resin of Pinus peuce provides high quality derivatives, Taking crown habit as a criterion, the following forms are determined:1) With spindle-shaped crowns (f. vermiculata); 2) With cone-shaped crowns (f. conica); 3) With column-shaped crowns (f. columnaris). According to branching habitat, three forms are distinguished: f. horizontalis, f. pyramidalis and f. pendula. Analogous to the other pine species the forms of Pinus peuce ,determined according to this feature, they have morphological characteristics that have resulted from continuous adaptation to particular ecological conditions.According to bark cracking, the following forms are determined: smooth-barked, scalebarked, with spruce-like-cracked bark and with longitudinally plate-like-cracked bark.According to the coloration of the strobiles, three forms can be observed: var. chlorocarpa, var. erythrocarpa and var. dichlora.According to morphology and natural range, two forms (ecotypes) are distinguished: var. typica (western part of Vardar River) and var. vermiculata (eastern part of Vardar River).Successful inter-specific hybridization has been carried out between: Pinus peuce x Pinus strobes L., x Pinus parviflora Based on the needle terpene profile some Pinus peuce populations from Serbia and Montenegro are more similar to those from Greece and Kosovo.Macedonian pine is generally considered to belong to the group of species which almost do not suffer from insect pests and fungus diseases. However, this statement exaggerates its generally good health status. In fact, this pine is more resistant to such factors, as compared with the other conifer species. A substantial reason for this resistance is the severe climatic conditions in the high parts of the mountains where it is spread, as these conditions do not favour the development of a number of diseases and pests. Another reason is the high resinousness/ resin content of its wood, buds and cones which is also a limiting factor because of the resin's toxic properties.The insects which attack Pinus peuce are bark beetles Ips amitinus Eichh. and Ips sexdentatus Boen., which impact mainly felled stems, Pityogenes chalcographus L., Pityogenes bidentatus Hrbst., Pityogenes bistridentatus Eichh. and Pityogenes quadridens Htg. which attack mainly young trees. Pissodes notatus Fabr. and Pissodes pini L. are secondary pests which impact the lower parts of the stems. Hylobius abietes L. is a mass pest which attacks mainly seedlings by gnawing their bark but it also feeds on needles. Availability of Myelophilus minor Hartm. and Myelophilus piniperda L. has been reported on the mountains of Pelister and Kozyak. Considerable resistance to Pissodes strobi Peck has been reported.Wood is damaged by Acanthocinus aedilis L. and Monochamus galloprovincialis Ol., which make galleries mainly in felled stems.The fungus diseases of Pinus peuce, even though less numerous than the insect pests, deliver more impact but of comparatively low degree. Macedonian pine is attacked by Heterobasidium annosum (Fr.) Bref., Phaeolus schweinitzii (Fr.) Par., Cenangium ferru g inosum Fr., Armillaria mellea (Vahl.) Karst., Trametes pini Fr., Polyporus sp., Stereum sp. and others. Considerable resistance to Cronartium ribicola J.C. Fisch. has been reported.With respect to air pollution, Pinus peuce growing in forest plantations and parks in different parts of Europe has been categorized by different authors as resistant to slightly resistant, the opinion about its relative resistance being the dominant one. According to the scale of gas resistance under acute impact of sulphur dioxide, Pinus peuce is related to the species of outward, slightly visible damage but of decreased productivity.This species forms as pure, so mixed stands most often occur with Picea abies (L.) Karst., Pinus sylvestris L., Pinus mugo Turra and less often with Abies alba Mill., Pinus nigra Arn., Pinus heldreichii Christ., Fagus sylvatica L. and other species.The contrasting bio-ecological peculiarities of Pinus peuce and Picea abies, of Pinus peuce and Abies alba and some other species have been combined very well in mixed, two-storeyed stands. That is why striving to establish such stands is reasonable from both the biological and ecological points of view.The natural regeneration of Pinus peuce depends on a number of factors such as altitude, type of forest, rate and periodicity of seeding, crown closure, relief, application of corresponding felling, etc. The state of most of the Pinus peuce forests requires the processes of regeneration to be directed by foresters with a view to preserving, taking care of and propagating this species.The in situ conservation method includes mainly the national and nature parks, reserves, seed stands and plus trees. By the ex situ method the genetic resources of Macedonian pine are preserved mainly through euce Pinus peuc Threats to genetic diversity Guidelines for genetic conservation and use eMacedonian pinePinus peuceMacedonian pinePinus peuceMacedonian pinePinus p provenance testing plantations, progeny trial plantations, seed orchards and genebanks for seeds. Assessing the advantages of the two methods for conservation of genetic resources, in situ seems to be more reliable. The autochthonous populations of Pinus peuce in Pirin Mt., Pelister Mt. and Prokletije Mt. present valuable genetic resources for the introduction of this species in many countries of the Northern Hemisphere.The area of Macedonian pine seed stands in Bulgaria is 693 ha and that of the seed orchards 10 ha, in Macedonia FYR -respectively 110 ha and 6 ha and in Serbia and Montenegro 10 ha of seed stands.The high grade stands in which trees with spindle-shaped crowns and shallow-scaled bark fissuring prevail should be preferred for the purposes of breeding. The existence of two edaphotypes -silicate and carbonate -should be taken into consideration.While selecting plus and candidate elite trees, individuals with narrow crown, fine and short branches of first order disposed approximately perpendicular to the stem should be selected. Citation : Alexandrov A.H. and V. Andonovski. 2011. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use of Macedonian pine (Pinus peuce). Bioversity International, Rome, Italy. 6 pages.Drawings: Pinus peuce, Claudio Giordano. © Bioversity International, 2004. ISBN 978-92-9043-826-7 "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0818646327.json b/main/part_2/0818646327.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..600d7692a9398d9ae0a21df08fef6ca34e464acf --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0818646327.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"78778f8be4b92df10b7a133e5e1b6686","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fda3a90b-8e9e-4951-95df-db98a64841a2/retrieve","id":"721339735"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"51dfd179-b370-42c8-8fd2-d9cfb9a09f16","content":"En varias zonas secas del planeta, se anticipa una fuerte competencia entre las zonas urbanas y los cultivos modernos por un recurso sencillo pero imprescindible: el agua. Luego que la energía fósil facilitó mucho el establecimiento de infraestructuras de riego, luego de muchas imprudencias resultando en la salinización de los suelos de perímetros bajo riego, vuelve otra vez el interés hacia los cultivos oriundos de zonas áridas. En las Américas, estos cultivos no son tantos, ya que las zonas desérticas no ocupan tanta extensión territorial, o que los pueblos pudieron establecerse en zonas más húmedas. Uno de los cultivos originales de Aridoamérica (Nabhan 1985) es el fríjol teparí, antes extendido desde Arizona hasta Yucatán y Guanacaste, hoy bajo clara regresión histórica por el auge del riego fácil (Debouck 1992). Sin embargo, es una opción demasiado buena (precocidad, heterosis, tolerancia al calor, sequía y salinidad) para dejarla perder.Esta investigación (Muñoz et al. 2006) dejó en claro varios resultados, todos fascinantes y esperanzadores a la vez. Primero, aunque el fríjol teparí cultivado es de baja diversidad genética, existe un acervo genético secundario para teparí, es decir una especie cercana adicional en la sección Acutifolii (Freytag & Debouck 2002), aparte de la especie cultivada y su progenitor silvestre. Una situación semejante ocurrió en el pasado con fríjol común que se consideraba aislado de las demás especies (Hucl & Scoles 1985), y luego la lista de los Phaseoli se agrandó (los taxa reclamados de esta sección fueron confirmados en esta investigación). Segundo, la identidad de los Rugosi, otro grupo sobresaliente por su tolerancia a condiciones extremas alrededor del Golfo de California, viene confirmada. Tercero, llama la atención las distancias genéticas entre varios grupos de teparí silvestre, parecidas a las distancias que separan los acervos genéticos dentro de Phaseolus vulgaris y P. lunatus. Pueden ser el resultado de una temprana diferenciación de las poblaciones aisladas en condiciones desérticas, con poca probabilidad de flujo génico por su cleistogamia. A pesar de la regresión histórica y de un muestreo incompleto, existe amplia variación en el teparí silvestre para el mejoramiento del teparí cultivado . Completar el muestreo permitiría de ampliar aún más la base genética, y realizar más el potencial de los marcadores moleculares, para resolver la pregunta sobre una única o doble domesticación inicial."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0850259036.json b/main/part_2/0850259036.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..284ff39decf18a811e2d2a452778d205bdd560d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0850259036.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4f5125d55fb8a99c29aeee9d425f402d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ea9e7825-09b7-4a56-9907-83108cf22ad8/retrieve","id":"-1449350538"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"783f0a11-209a-43fb-aa4b-7f1940931e79","content":"The Nile Basin Development Challenge (NBDC) is funded by the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF). It aims to improve the resilience of rural livelihoods in the Ethiopian highlands through a landscape approach to rainwater management. It comprises five linked projects examining: 1) Learning from the past; 2) developing integrated rainwater management strategies; 3) targeting and scaling out of rainwater management innovations; 4) assessing and anticipating the consequences of innovation in rainwater management systems; and 5) catalyzing platforms for learning, communication and coordination across the projects.The NBDC is implemented by a consortium comprising theThe 'Nile 3' project of the Nile Basin Development Challenge (NBDC -http://www.nilebdc.org) has developed feasibility maps, this are maps that combine biophysical suitability with willingness of adoption, both for single rainwater management practices as well as for combinations of practices at landscape scale. The biophysical suitability is based on suitability condition identified through experts and literature, whereas willingness of adoption is computed based on actual data from a farm household survey (IFPRI) from 2005.To validate these maps, the project needs to understand adoption and non-adoption of rainwater management practices and strategies. A multi-scale approach to capture dynamics from farm and landscape scales was chosen. To capture the farm scale, 600 farmers in 7 different watersheds of the Ethiopian Blue Nile were chosen (2 from the NBDC project). In the 4 new watersheds (Gorosole watershed (Ambo) and Laku watershed (Shambu) were chosen in Oromia as well as Maksenit watershed (Gonder) and Zefie watershed (Debre Tabor) in Amhara region), focus groups were run to capture the landscape scale. These focus group discussions brought together key informants from the community and asked them to imagine the best possible rainwater management strategy for their watershed and then discuss what hampers the implementation of that strategy.This report brings together the information collected during the focus group discussions and transect walks and serves as reference for the validation process 1 .The landscape approach We wanted to understand why farmers do not adopt some rainwater management strategies despite of their potential benefits. Under rainwater management strategies, we understand a combination of rainwater management practices that increases water infiltrations in the up-slope of a landscape, soil and water conservation in the mid-slope, and water productivity in the down-slope. Rainwater management practice is understood in very broad terms and goes beyond water harvesting to include a whole range of practices affecting crops, livestock and trees.A range of practices was selected, making sure that all the zones and land used were covered. The selection was made based on GIZ major activities in Ethiopia. The modeled practices were soil/stone bunds, terraces, gully rehabilitation/check dams, multipurpose trees, orchards (apple and mango), river diversion, wells, water harvesting/ponds, grassland management (enclosure, limiting animal movement, over-sowing).Four watersheds were selected by OARI (Oromia Agricultural Research Institute) and ARARI (Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute) using the following selection criteria:Making sure to encounter all the modeled practices at least in one of watersheds  Having watershed with strong NGO intervention and watershed with little NGO intervention  Size and slope of the watershed: the watershed should be relatively small, i.e. manageable by one or two communities and therefore fit our concept of landscape within a short distance  Existing connection through OARI and ARARIBased on these criteria, Gorosole watershed (Ambo) and Laku watershed (Shambu) were chosen in Oromia as well as Maksenit watershed (Gonder) and Zefie watershed (Debre Tabor) in Amhara region (see Figure 1). Transect walkEach watershed was first assessed with a transect walk, allowing to all the supporting staff of the focus group discussion to understand the boundaries of the watershed, as well as the different landuses and already existing practices adopted in the area.Focus group discussions based on the 'happy strategies' gameThe focus group discussion itself is based on three different steps:1. Participatory mapping exercise in separate groups for men and women; 2.A adapted form of the 'happy strategies' game in separate groups for men and women; 3.A group mixed discussion (men and women together).Preliminary to the whole focus group discussion, an extended introduction made sure that the farmers understood the purpose of the exercise including our broad definition of rainwater management and the no wrong expectations are raised.The participants were given pencil and rubbers as well as flip chart paper and were asked to draw the border of the watershed, the rivers, the roads and the settlement. When everyone agreed on these features, the border was marked in black, the roads in read, and the streams in blue.In a second stage, different land-use/land cover can be indicated with colored post-it: green for forest, pink for degraded land, grey for grazing land, yellow or what is left over (white) represents crop land.Initially the game was conceived for stakeholders and scientists to validate our database of practices and come up with a rational on how to combine practices into strategies. The game consists of cards that describe about 30 rainwater management practices in terms of purpose and feasibility. In its initial form, participants are ask to select a practice and to find other participant to form a 'happy strategies' (inspired by the game known as 'happy families') around a given landscape 2 .For the focus group, these cards were translated into Oromo and Amharic. In a first step the participants were asked to name all rainwater management practices they know of. It not mentioned the 8 modeled practices were explicitly asked for. Participants could then choose their favorite practice independently and come back into the discussion group. Each participant placed the card in the location on the map where it would be most suitable and reached a consensus with the other participants. If a participant had a card that had already been discussed, she/he could change the card.After the first round, one can go for a second round with the 'second favorite practice' until no new practices are suggested. The game contains innovation cards that are empty practice cards that can be filled if the suggested practice is not part of the game. Along the discussion around placing the cards, people can discuss the suitability conditions, the benefit of the practices, if it was adopted, what type of support were available, if not adopted, why and what hampered the adoption. These limitations are captured on the 'intervention cards', which describes support needed for the implementation of the strategy which goes beyond farmer's individual decision making. Finally, beneficiaries and upstream-downstream effect can be discussed when the selected combination is discussed in more general terms.In a final step of the focus group, both group present each other's work and discuss the differences. In this way, the work of each group can be validated and differences discussed.Validating feasibility maps with real observations from the ground is tricky. Indeed, one might find locations in which a given practice is suitable but has not been adopted. This does not automatically imply that the suitability or the feasibility conditions are wrong. It might be that on those locations adoption is hampered by an external issue that could not be captured correctly in the adoption model. Indeed, many factors simply cannot be and might never be represented in a spatially explicit manner, as for example, religious believes, lack of collective action, lack of access to the necessary input or lack of access to relevant and high quality training and advice cannot be mapped out. Also in the Ethiopian context, a practice can be adopted on a non-suitable location. Indeed a practice might have been promoted through a governmental campaign may oblige farmers to adopt practices on not suitable locations. Therefore a practice observed on the ground is not automatically a proof that suitability conditions have been met.In order to identify if the suitability/feasibility maps are built on wrong assumptions or if adoption has been hampered by a constraint that it not 'mapable' (implying that the location is suitable even if no farmer has adopted the practice), the focus group discussion focuses on the practices farmers would like to have regardless of having adopted it or not. In this way, a farmer can indicate that the area is suitable and suggest the intervention needed in order to enable the adoption. Also when a practice has been adopted on a non-suitable location, farmers can be asked about the reason of adoption and perceived benefit.The Gorosole watershed is crossed by the road from Ambo to Bako. The watershed has clearly defined boundaries. It has a hillside on both side and in the middle there is a perennial river fed by non-perennial streams. The up-slope is covered by forest. It is a densely used landscape. Very little soil and water conservation can be seen. The few that are there are not well spaced, are not built correctly, or have not been correctly maintained. Despite that, some good practices can be seen such as keeping some crop residues in the fields.The landscape has gullies that are vegetated and look relatively well maintained. It seems that the vegetation in the gullies is natural, and no big intervention was needed to maintain them, except restricting cutting of the trees in the gully. On one side of the watershed, the fields have spare farm trees, mainly acacia. Also some woodlot of natural forest can be found on religious locations. There is no communal grassland, and livestock intensity seems to be important and therefore access to fodder a real challenge. One of the villages is at the edge of the watershed, only very few settlements can be found in the watershed.Discussion from the women's groupParticipants started with drawing the main river called Kile, then the perennial affluent (blue line) and then the non-perennial affluent (doted blue line).Then they drew the border (black line) and finally they draw the asphalt road (red line) crossing the middle of the basin and the seasonal paths (doted red lines).Then they placed the land uses. They started with the forest (green papers), placing them on the right locations and indicating the name of each location.Then they looked degraded land and grazing land.They mentioned that there is only very little grazing land which is a problem for the community.Table 2 shows the practices proposed by women in the Gorosole watershed as well as their location.Apples were proposed in the up-slope, because they are suitable in the highlands and are perceived as potentially high income generating because apple price is high.Around the perennial rivers, traditional river diversion can be found. On locations around the river where diversion are not feasible, a motor pump could be used for irrigation. On the degraded land, gully rehabilitation including check-dam and tree planning is suitable and has been implemented. Better community mobilization would be needed to maintain the structures.Sesbania is a nitrogen binding fodder tree that can be found in many cropland areas in the watershed.Finally the women mentioned that livestock intensity is a big problem in the watershed and there is not sufficient grazing land. Orchards: Fruit trees are not grown in the watershed. Women would like to have apple trees, as they can expect some cash income from the apples. They cannot plant apples tree because they don't know where to obtain the seedlings.Roof rainwater harvesting, ponds, wells: Water harvesting is not perceived as necessary, as there is sufficient water the whole year round in the watershed.Gully rehabilitation: Women indicated that the degraded land were very degraded and needed to be rehabilitated. In the upland this has been done by planting sesbania. More could be done in terms of gullies in the lowlands.As there are enough stones in the watershed, it is a relatively easy practice. But as it is very labor intensive, the women expect that those should be built in some kind of community action.The plots that are irrigated thanks to river diversion are used to grow onions. The river diversions are traditional diversion weirs constructed by the farmers themselves. Women perceive that river diversion has been adopted wherever possible. Other areas could be reached if they would have access to a pump. Unfortunately a pump is too costly, as well as the access to the pump and to its spare parts its difficult.Limiting animal movement and destocking: Livestock is very intensive and in seen as a polluting factor in the community. Therefore women think animal movement should be limited and numbers of livestock reduced.The women's group proposed three practices that were not adopted. Apple trees are not planted despite their suitability. Smallholders think that apple trees could improve their livelihoods as apples have a high market price. The reason for non-adoption is the lack of access to seedlings.Livestock intensity is very high in the watershed and fodder is a limitation. Therefore they would like to over-sow their grazing land both communal and private in to produce better quality forage. This practice has not been adopted because they lack access to the seeds. The women also mentioned that even if they get the seeds, they would need some training to exploit them. Finally the women proposed to use a motor pump for irrigation around the perennial river where river diversion is not possible. But a motor pump in out of reach, as it is not possible to access it in the area, even if they could afford it. They would consider this if there would be access to the pump and to credit. Women mentioned that with the river diversion and the proposed pumping downstream, farmers might not get sufficient water anymore.Discussion from the men's groupFarmers preferred to start the sketch mapping by drawing the main river called Kile (in Blue). The main river helps the group as a reference point. Then, the boundary of the watershed that lies across two kebeles Chancho Obi and Kile Borodo was mapped with contributions from all participants. An allweather road and various paths across and along the watershed were subsequently drawn. Settlement and land use/cover were also denoted on the sketch map with relative precision. During the process, farmers commented that virtually all parts of the watershed are characterized by terrain feature or step slope. On top of this, they pointed out that the watershed is largely occupied by crop production. In most cases only pockets of grazing land that seasonally are put under fallow and then back to crop production are privately owned by the farmers. In addition, there are also pieces of grazing land found scattered on the river side and marshy area. Almost all the grazing reserves are privately owned though free grazing during the off season gives access to all. At the end the group categorized the watershed in to three different zones (Z1-Z3) based on the altitude and agro ecology, and also affixed legend for the watershed. This initial exercise ultimately simplified playing the happy strategies game.During the process of describing the preferred landscape, farmers were asked to mention all the rainwater management practices. Farmers in the group mentioned numerous conventional and modern rain water management technologies/practices in their area, including: Table 3 shows the list of practice that the farmers have selected for their watersheds. During the first round of the game, farmers selected and allocated cards both for the innovation and from existing practices. As an entry to the individual exercise/ game, farmers selected large scheme irrigation (river diversion) in groups as an innovation with which they kicked off the game. Associated interventions like financial support were needed to upgrade the scarce and scattered irrigation endeavor limited to a few farmers. Hence, farmers envisaged the need to outreach the existing benefit to more currently non-benefiting farmers. To this effect the farmers need materials (cement) and technical support l in layout, design and development of the diversions.As a follow-up of the game, practices like highland fruit (apple and peach), grass strips, cut off drain (2), check dam, contour hedge/life fence (2), conservation agriculture, drainage ditch and stone/soil bund were initially opted in that order and allocated by the farmers to the respective sites where the benefit can be accrued if properly implemented by the resident farmers. Large scheme irrigation (river diversion): On the sketch map farmers located the scheme development on the northwest part of the watershed at the bottom side of the main asphalt road. If large scheme irrigation develops in that direction they believe it can command a large area of land and make large community beneficiary. Though they have tried to divert using sandbags during the dry season, rainfall and large volume of river flow collapsed every effort so far. As a result, farmers gave up the efforts because of its unsustainability. Besides, financial and technical shortages were also seen as constraints. The stony nature of the land also hinders the progress.A farmer chose high value crops like highland fruit particularly apple as an innovative practice for zone 2 (midland) and zone 1 (highland). He justified that the agro ecology is ideal for growing apple. Besides, his access to irrigation water would help him to manage the crop efficiently. Another farmer also selected peach as innovation practice to be implemented in similar areas. However, planting material (seedlings) supply from concerned development promoters be it NGO or GOs is welcomed by the farmers as intervention.Grass strips: Grass strips first introduced to the upstream (zone 1) of the watershed by the NGO. Its benefit could also be expanding to the gentle slope area of the middle and lower part of the watershed. Apart from the use for cut and carry system for livestock feed, a farmer described the importance of grass strips for various land management practices. Particularly, reduction of soil erosion and downstream siltation, mentioned among others.Cut off drain: This is largely recommended by the farmers for the upstream and midstream (zone 1 and 2) steep slope area where there is erosion. The implication is that the structure reduces runoff and safeguards the soil structure and fertility by arresting the erosion impact.Check-dam: According to a participant, erosion is a serious problem in the midland (zone 2) of the watershed. The volume of the runoff is largely increased in this area. Hence, landslide and gully formation is aggravated. Therefore, a check-dam is very important to arrest the expansion of gullies.Land slide and expansion of the mouth of the river is also common in this part of the zone extending to zone 1 (upstream) area. To reduce the impact of expansion farmers plow their farmland a bit far away from the damage area to avoid landslides entering in to the heart of their farmland.Multipurpose trees (MPTs) particularly Sesbania were considered as component of contour hedges. Such plantation is favored everywhere in the watershed particularly around the homestead. Introduction of MPTs has been made by the office of agriculture in the mid to lower area and by an NGO particularly on the upstream area of the watershed. Farmers suggested they are using MPT for wind breaks, fencing, animal feed and for fuel wood.Conservation agriculture: CA is largely favored by the farmers in the three watershed zones. Some of the beneficial contributions of conservation agriculture are:  Supply more soil organic matter  Improve soil fertility and crop productivity  Reduce runoff  Improve soil water retention capacity.However, the practice is not yet popularized in the watershed. Stone/soil bund: Bund making was discovered as an ideal practice for all part of the watershed. TheStep slope nature of the watershed attribute for the widespread need of bund. However, stone bund was first introduced in the upper watershed similar to the grass strip and MPTs by the NGO.Currently, however, soil bund targeting the degraded and largely vulnerable area has been implemented on the upper side of the watershed (z1 &z2). From our observation, however, although it is not technically appropriate we have also visited soil bund in the downstream of the watershed. Development agents have assisted the introduction of the practice at larger scale.According to the farmers, the watershed in which they are currently living has been gradually evolving to have more negative features and associated consequences. This implies that the features and the benefits it offered in the past have been completely changed. Elders tried to see the hindsight to recall and relate what the watershed looked like in the old days. Less crop land but higher yield per unit area, more forest cover and massive biodiversity pool, uniform rainfall intensity and distribution, green land, etc., were suggested. Currently, however, the rainfall pattern has become more erratic, reduced crop production and productivity and other climate and land use related anthropogenic calamities are escalating. As a result, several threats confront agricultural production.In contrast, farmers anticipated a positive future as a dream or ideal watershed that could replace the existing one. The dream could become a reality by integrating appropriate rainwater management practices in to the existing system. In such a way the ideal watershed feature mimics the past watershed where the ecosystem was resilient and very less disturbed and ideal to obtain reliable production and ecosystem functioning. Therefore, farmers envisaged the future as the place where food security was ensured while conserving natural resource bases. Among the major expectation list under the dream watershed are green area, food secure community, increased ground water level, reliable rainfall and its distribution, reliable and friendly weather, access to adequate and clean water for both human and livestock.Based on their perception, four practices were not sufficiently adopted in the watershed: improved river diversion, highland fruits (apple and peach), over-sowing, and grass strips.River diversion could be improved, with better design and concrete material. Both the access to the material and to the needed finances hampers the development of better irrigation schemes. Highland fruits are like in the women's group seen as a high potential to improve incomes. Non-adoption is linked to the lack of access to seedlings. Grass strips are adopted only in the up-slope. Smallholders think that it would be appropriate to have them on other locations also, but lack access to grass seeds. Similarly, over-sowing private and communal grazing land was suggested, but cannot be implemented as long as it is not possible to access the right seeds.According to the participants, if all the selected practices are integrated and properly implemented, every farmers residing in different part/zone of the watershed will benefit. However, farmers believed that actions should begin in the upstream (zone1) of the watershed. In line with this, a farmer told us a local saying 'once the water touches the head, it never fails to reach the foot.' Similarly, both the positive and the negative impact of the watershed management equally reach all other zones of the watershed. Explicitly, positive consequence that begins in the upstream would gradually extend down to reach the downstream. Hence, farmers envisaged tradeoff among the integrated watershed management practices. Accordingly, all farmers become beneficiaries of the proper implementation. However, if the practices fail to integrate or are improperly implemented the middle and lower watershed area are highly vulnerable to runoff and siltation. Hence, they would become losers.The suitability map for Ambo district suggested that we should find apple trees, river diversion, grassland management, soil bunds and terraces. All of them were mentioned in the focus groups.Apple trees as well as grassland management were not adopted due to the lack of access to seeds and training but could in principle be adopted with the correct interventions.Final mixed discussion, participant's reflectionAt the end of the exercise, participants reflected on the day. A farmer starts with the statement 'our period is the time to make choice between either to live or not to live'. As crop production is highly vulnerable to climate uncertainty, the future is full of gloom and despair. Hence a country like Ethiopia could only develop if there is integration/sharing of resources and knowledge like this one. Hence, they would be able to think about resilient crop production system that safeguards the natural resource base. On top of this, he added that the lesson they were offered during the exercise is part of the knowledge sharing effort that enable them to have broad insight about the present and the future in terms of rainwater or land management so as to ensure sustainability of the system. They were largely impressed by the exercise and highly grateful for that. Men and women came up with very similar landscapes. The men's group mentioned more practices that are not part of the game cards but were adopted in the watershed, suggesting good knowledge of the area. Women seemed to have a less good knowledge about the watershed, reflected by the less detailed map and the much longer discussion about the maps. Also they have not mentioned practices that have been adopted but were not in the game. Nonetheless they came up with more non-adopted but suitable practices for the watershed, namely the livestock related practices and the motor pump.Shambu watershed can be split into 3 zones, upland midland and lowland. Each can be considered as a landscape with an up-slope, mid-slope and low-slope. The highland area corresponds to our classical landscape where the low-slope is a flat area with grazing land; the mid-slope has agricultural production year-round due to a river diversion, combined with apple trees. The up-slope is forest. The midland has a forested up-slope, soil and water conservation on the mid-slope and no lowslope. The lowland has an important slope and is mainly sparse forest; it has no low-slope at the outlet. Farmers in the upland on the mid-slope, have river diversions that allow them to cultivate around the year, especially high value crops during the dry season. We visited a farmer that had apple trees, irrigated all his land through a river diversion, had modern beehives, a storage room for fodder and collected manure in one place so he could spread it on his land. This farmer seemed very well educated as he understood the questions in English and answered in Oromo. There is no NGO active in the watershed and all the initiatives taken in this watershed is bottom up, supported by the DA and extension service.Many farmers live in the two settlements Laku and Shambu. Both settlements have access to electricity.Discussion from the women's groupIn a first step, the key informants drew the boundary of the watershed and then, after sketching the major river stream, found the watershed. The group selected one active woman farmer who led them during the map sketching. Using different markers and colour cards, the women's group identified in their resource map the upper, mid and the lower streams, the roads (seasonal and all-weather), seasonal rivers, crop land, forest land, degraded land, grazing land. During the focus group discussion, the participants/ key informants also included the most relevant community development institutions found in the watershed. These included the village administration, primary school, cooperatives and farmers training center. The women's group started with defining the mountain that border the watershed.Once they agreed on the watershed boundaries, they added the rivers, perennial and non-perennial (blue dotted line) as well as the gravel road (red line) and walking path. The women's group came up with a landscape composed of the practices found in Table 4. Orchards (Apple and papaya): On the map, farmers put the orchards (apple tree and papaya) at the upper side of the watershed. Farmers perceived these soils as more suitable for planting apple rather than crops, due its high slope/steep. On top of that farmers understood that planting apple on sloping area can reduce high water runoff and increase water infiltration. In other words, it decreases soil erosion when the technology is properly planted on the steep slope of the watershed. Though they have tried to allocate this practice at upper side of the watershed, most farmers have not implemented this practice on their farm due to poor availability of seed, lack of awareness on the benefit of this technology and shortage of finance.River diversion: During the focus group discussions, the women group recommended river diversions for the lower as well as for midlands of the watershed area. The reasoning is that these two zones of the watershed contain most of the crop land and several river streams. The topography in these zones is also suitable for irrigation schemes. Farmers mentioned that the existing irrigation scheme is not efficiently used by the community and they produce only a few horticultural crops. Limited water availability for irrigation during the winter season and poor maintenance of the schemes are the major constraints faced the farmers.The key informants allocated gully rehabilitation to the upper and mid lands of the watershed where there is serious soil erosion due to overgrazing by livestock and frequent ploughing. The land on the upper side of the watershed is more degraded as compared to the mid land of watershed due to high runoff water and overgrazing. Grazing land management: Forage grass is one of the most important rainwater management practices used by farmers in the watershed. During the focus group discussion, farmers selected and allocated this practice for the mid land and upper levels of the watershed. This is mainly due to the suitable land availability in these zones. Overall however, there is a shortage in availability of the improved forage technology in the watershed. In general, in order to increase fodder, grazing land management should come with over-sowing, area enclosure, cut and carry system, and limiting of animal movement.Soil bund/ stone: Thanks to the government campaign this year, many farmers in the watershed have started to make stone/ soil bund on their farm land. Due to this, farmers were already aware about this technology and they easily allocated the practice at the mid and upper levels of the watershed which have steep slopes.Multipurpose tree (Sesbania): Farmers preferred to allocate multipurpose trees, particularly sesbania, to the mid and lower levels of the watershed, specifically around their homestead. This is because the tree is mainly used for forage purposes and as a fence around the homestead. Improved dairy breeds: Farmers allocated this technology to the mid and upper levels of the watershed, because these areas have ample grazing lands with suitable quality type of grass and easily accessible to roads to buy feed and sell products. Farmers living in the upper level of the watershed have already adopted improved dairy technology. However farmers reported that the milk productivity of this breed is not attractive due to limited concentrate feed availability in the area.Fertility management (Crop rotation, intercropping): Farmers allocated technology to the mid and lower levels of the watershed. Farmers justified this according to the suitability of the cultivable land found in these zones. Farmers practice crop rotation several years and they also know the benefit of this practice, though intercropping is not used by farmers in the watershed. This may be due to lack of awareness on the economic and agronomic benefit of the intercropping practices. Crop productivity is declining from year to year mainly due to dominant mono cropping and serious soil erosion in the area. Farmers adopted improved cereals crop like tef, wheat, barley and also horticultural crops like potato and apple to improve their livelihoods. Wells: One farmer owns a well near to the grazing land.Improved seeds: Farmers mentioned they would like to have improved seeds, but they don't have access to them.Many rainwater management practices have been promoted in this watershed regardless of sitespecific biophysical, socio economic and institutional environments, yet their adoption is low. During the focus group discussion farmers reported that the existing natural resources found in the landscape are deteriorating over time. In other word the trends of crop productivity, natural resource conservation (particularly forest, soil and water conservation) and livestock productivity were continuously declining over time. The distribution of rainfall and pattern of rainfall have also changed. Land degradation is another factor aggravated by mono-cropping, deforestation and overgrazing of the land. In the future, farmers wish that appropriate implementation of rainwater management technologies can change these scenarios.Sometimes it is difficulties to get practices that can work across the whole watershed -due to socio economic, biophysical and institutional factors, improper implementation of practices or a lack of integration among the technologies. Some groups benefit from the new technology, while others groups are technology losers. Due to the scarcity of natural resources, conflict may exist between the people living in the upper and lower sides of the watershed. For instance in the Gorosole watershed, farmers perceived that if the river diversion is allocated at the mid lands, the lower side may not benefit as much as the upper. Interventions need to be integrated to benefit all groups. Discussion from the men's groupThe men's group started to draw the boundaries from the west, using mountains and settlements as reference points. Later on they added the secondary school. After the boundaries and mountain and settlements where set, they draw the rivers, starting with the perennial ones and then passing to the non-perennial ones. They identified the forest areas and differentiated between natural forest and planted forest. Then they identified the degraded land and the causes of degradation. The degradation on the left river bank is mainly due to deforestation, whereas the degradation on the right river bank is erosion mainly due to wrong soil management. Finally they identified grazing land and indicated if it is private or communal. Private grazing land in the upland seems to be used as communal grazing land. Farmers identified one non-seasonal road (non-asphalt) from Shamboo town to Sekela and one seasonal road to Gitilo, the highest part of the watershed (red line). Moreover, two main paths (on foot) also cross within the watershed (red dotted lines). One crosses the watershed from Sekela to Shambo and from Gitilo to the same town. Although Lakku River is the main perennial river, there are also nine small tributary (perennial) rivers which flow to the main river and have only one outlet, called chancho. Farmers also identified seasonal tributary rivers. They identified that most of the rivers in the watershed like Lakku, Deju, Aba ingida, Getahun, homi kuro and Gucho offer potential for river diversions. Settlement (around Shambo town and Lakku village) and land use/cover were also denoted on the map.Group members also classified the land as cultivated land, grazing land, degraded land and both plantation and natural forest land. According to their classification, most land is for crops in all zones. There is common and private grazing lands at the upper (shifted from forest land to grazing land due to over grazing and deforestation) and along riverbanks. Farmers complained among one another on the issue of common grazing land. Farmers who have enough land have equal rights to use common grazing as those with very limited land. Occasional conflict happens due to competition on common grazing land. They also categorized some parts of the area, particularly along rivers, to be degraded land due to continuous deforestation and intensive cultivation. Almost all the farmers were aware of rainwater managements options like soil and stone bunds, river diversion, ponds, wells, cut-off drains, cut and carry system, use of multipurpose trees, gully rehabilitations, uses of improved breeds of livestock, poultry production, area closure, conservation tillage (residue managements), different fruit production (like apples), motor pumps and live fence as contour planting. Farmers have also been trained and have experience largely from development agents, agricultural experts from district office and even NGOs.In the game, one farmer selected improved breeds of poultry production as the innovation since it is easy to intensify on small plots of land and needs less initial capital. According to the farmer, poultry production is suitable in the middle parts of the watershed as it has suitable weather condition. He argued that this technology definitely ensures income generation, particularly for households who don't have enough land to produce their annual food requirements. To this effect, the farmers need improved breeds and materials, like incubators and other technical and financial support. The farmers also called for improved access to improved breeds of livestock and seeds, particularly wheat, barley, beans and linseeds.As the game continued, practices like highland fruit (apple), cut off drains, check dams, contour hedge/life fence, conservation agriculture (residue managements), ponds, motor pump, cut and carry system, area closure, stone/soil bund, wells and over sowing on crop land (innovation) were initially chosen and allocated by the farmers to the various watershed zones. The selected technologies and purpose (suitability, benefits and interaction) were:Highland fruit (apple): Even though some farmers practice apple productions in the watershed area, a farmer chose this high value crop mostly for mid land and even for upper land if there is good soil condition and soil depth. His justification is that the agro ecology is ideal for growing apples. Besides, access to irrigation water and mulching practices are other opportunities to grow the crop efficiently. Demand of planting material (seedling), supply of different improved varieties, strong market linkages are the main areas where the farmers need support. Contour hedge (life fence): Multipurpose trees particularly vernonia, Sesbania (but not common) and other bush types which are characterized as co-friendly with crops are considered as life fence/hedge rows. Such is common everywhere in the watershed around the homestead. They indicated that such types of trees are used for animal feeds, to improve soil fertility, life fence, for construction and even for wind breaks.Conservation agriculture (residue management): Conservation agriculture was mainly selected and even practiced in the middle and lower parts of the watershed. They want this particularly on degraded land because of its multiple benefits, which improve more soil organic matter of degraded land, improve soil fertility and crop productivity, reduce runoff and improve soil water retention capacity. High competition for residues by livestock is the main bottleneck to ensure sustainable residue incorporation in the area. A farmer suggested that the main solution is diversion of overstocking livestock production to cut and carry systems using improved breeds and intensification of poultry industry to reduce residue competition. Conservation agriculture improves soil moisture and fertility and contributes to other technologies like fruit and feed production.Stone/soil bund: Both stone and soil bunds were started some time ago though not sustainably practiced. Currently soil bunds targeting the degraded and largely steep areas have been implemented on the upper and along some river sides of the watershed.Cut off drains: These are largely recommended by the farmers for the upper level or steep slope areas where erosion is accelerating in the middle and low slope areas. Most farmers who live in the upper areas believe that cut off drains significantly reduce and save the soil biophysical characteristics and impact on soil erosion.Motor pump: A farmer preferred this technology in the lower parts of watershed areas since there are potential rivers for irrigation. He preferred motor pump as a solution because of the nature of the river, which is in a deep valley and is difficult to divert. However, the farmer needs both technical and financial support for effective utilization of the technology.Ponds: According to the participants, ponds are suitable in middle parts of the watershed since they can easily capture run-off and for irrigation purposes. Though the farmers know the technology, they did not so far practice it in the watershed due to limited awareness and lack of materials, financial problems and even no technical supports.As per the farmers' suggestion, erosion is a serious problem in the middle and upper levels. They prefer to implement check dams in the middle parts. Check dams effectively reduce the speed of soil water erosion, improve soil fertility and increase infiltration rates. This technology has positive effects for other interventions, particularly fruit production, it increases the biomass of feeds, increases spring sources, and it enhances water availability in the watershed. Some farmers explained that they have been constructing such dams in gully areas using wood (woodlot check dam). However, they need additional technical support and inputs for construction of the check dam.Poultry farming: Famers suggested that increasing their amount of chicken would give them good additional income. This would allow them to overcome the losses of livestock needed to decrease the pressure on the land. Destocking would be much easier.The farmers also preferred this technology for middle parts of the watershed areas since there is potential availability of underground water at 12-15 meter depth. Over sowing improved forage crops on crop land: Though some participants who do not have enough crop land reserved themselves, sowing of improved forage varieties on cultivated land is one of the main solutions to reduce the shortage of animal feeds. It is suitable in every watershed area around the homesteads and on good soil so that it is easy to protect from animals. However, the farmers did not get enough improved forage varieties for intensive production in the watershed. Financial and technical support is what they seek.Area closure: This technology was preferred by the participants in the upper mountain where bushes are very common and where diversity of trees and bushes can be regenerated if well-protected. Participants regretted their previous deforestation practices on natural forest that resulted in land degradation. They were eager to close the areas (upper parts) where bushes are very common. They also need to interplant fast growing trees in the closed areas though there is limited access to such trees. According to the farmers, the current watershed has been gradually degraded with negative consequences. Most of the crop lands are less productive, overgrazing and deforestation of the natural forest are also causing soil degradation. Farmers indicated that in the past there was dense natural forest and the soil was very productive. But now, it is declining at alarming rates due to their mismanagement. Consequently, less production per unit area, continuous soil erosion, shortage of animal feeds due to shortage of land, high variability of rain fall are currently observed in the watershed. However, farmers predict future positive consequences on the watershed landscape if all selected water management options are implemented in each watershed area. High production and productivity, improved feed availability and hence high livestock productivity, ensure sustainable land resource managements, more forest cover will be the positive effect if all selected components are practiced at each selected site. One farmer argued that implementing all the selected technologies will make the country green.Though farmers in Lakku watershed are familiar with some of the practices, other options which were not so far practiced include over sowing of improved forage crops, area closure, cut and carry systems, motor pump and ponds. Lack of collective action, particularly for river diversion and motor pump is the main issue that should be in addressed. Diversifying into poultry also seems an interesting option.Participants had two contrasting ideas on the issue of winners and losers (trade-off). Some members explained that if all allocated technologies are well practiced in each watershed slope, farmers who are living in lower area will benefit more than those in the upper ones. In contrast, some farmers believe that if all selected practices are well done in integrated approaches and properly implemented, every farmer living in different altitudes of the watershed will equally benefit. As a general conclusion, most farmers will benefit if integrated water management is successfully implemented in each watershed part. Participants also suggested that if the proposed practices are not implemented in a very good manner, all farmers living in the watershed are also similarly losers since deforestation ( in upper parts), soil erosion and gully formation ( middle and lower parts) and overflows and siltation( in the lower parts) will be aggravated.The project-developed maps in Shambu woreda perform relatively badly. The only prediction for this area is all types of bunds (soil, stone and fanya-juu). The map does not predict apple trees, suggesting that the suitability for apple trees has to be reviewed. Also no river diversions are predicted, because the river map used does not indicate any perennial river in the whole district.Participants generally compared the current feature of the landscape with last three decades. Unwise land use systems resulted in unproductive land, deforestation and uncertain rainfall. They trusted that if they implement all integrated rain water management in the watershed, land resources will recover and become productive. Finally, they promised to teach their neighbors what they have learned during the strategy game.The women's group faced difficulties in mapping the watershed, and the mapping was mainly taken over by the DA. The women were therefore less active, something that was addressed explicitly in the Amhara focus groups. The male group was a great success. The group of farmers seems to have really enjoyed the exercise. They came up with creative solutions and were very keen to learn.Maksenit watershed with its 6000 ha is the largest of the four watersheds and lies at the border of Maksenit town (Southeast of Gonder). It is also one of the driest watersheds we looked at, with 700-800 mm rainfall annually. Its structure is complex, as it is formed by several micro-catchments. In the highlands, there are two ranges of mountains covered with shrubs. There is very little mid land and a large lowland plain. The two mountain ranges make the border of the watershed complex, and only expert eyes can recognize the borders. Only the low land is cultivated.Near to the outlet around the perennial rivers, river diversions allow for double cropping. In other locations around the river the topography does not really allow for diversion. In these locations, farmers sometimes irrigate with motor pumps. One farmer has a pump and rents it out to the others. River diversions can also be found near to the non-perennial rivers. These allow irrigating the plots long enough to have two or three crops. The cash crop is mainly garlic during the dry season. As the plain keeps soils moisture well, sometimes after the main crop, farmers manage to crow peas with the residual moisture. In the non-perennial rivers, micro reservoirs are built in the river bed to capture some water. Wells are also found in these river beds. We met a rich female-headed household which was building a house in Maksenit for rental purposes. This household own 4 hectare of which one is in the lowland and is irrigated the whole year round.The major income comes from garlic, but also honey and from a mobile tree nursery.On what could be recognized as mid land, one farmer had a papaya orchard. Mango is not suitable because it gets attacked by termites. Also in this mid land, we found a nursery for pepper. The farmers carry the water for about half a kilometer from a small reservoir in the river bed. In this watershed, ICARDA is active. Five model farmers have received a rainwater harvesting pond. One farmer got a treadle pump and a drip irrigation system. With this he can irrigate a plot of 30x18 m during the dry season and overcome dry spells with supplemental irrigation. Another farmer uses a simple bucket to irrigate during the dry season from the ponds. After one year, his income has increased significantly. Also ICARDA has built measurement gauges to assess the sediments of a treated and an untreated micro-catchment. Finally ICARDA installed a treadle pump near the bed of the non-perennial river, allowing access to the underground stream for domestic use.On the way to the outlet, but outside the watershed, there is a state run tree nursery that grows multipurpose trees and gives the seedlings away for free. Many farmers also have small mobile tree nurseries where they grow their own tree seedlings. We also found a private tree nursery that was attacked by termites and all the work was lost.Discussion from the women's groupThe sources and sub water sheds of both kebeles are discussed and identified. According to the participants, Bisnit, Welenbay, Chemena and Ayaye are sub-watersheds in Dinzaz kebele. But Ayaye watershed is bordered to both Degola Chinchaye and Das Dinzaz kebeles. Improved soil nutrient input (organic and inorganic fertilizer): They use both methods and mentioned its use increases crop production, improves livestock feed, improves human feed etc. But they believe that organic compost is very useful in the long run. The reasons why it is not used very widely are lack of awareness, no credit service, lack of labour and due to less number of animals. But one woman said that I have no animals at home but am still using home waste and residues for organic compost.Bunds: uses for soil conservation, keeps water resources, improve crop production.Flood diversion (spate irrigation): It increases crop production, increase cash income. We can plant vegetables (like onion, potato, etc…), crops like barley, chickpea and others. Therefore we can have production of 3 times in a year.Afforestation: Would be needed to recover degraded lands of Degola and Enkre Medhane Alem but did not happen yet Home garden: they prefer home gardens to lowland orchards (papaya, coffee, gesho, …) combined with pepper. These gardens can be a cash income especially for women. Lack of water is a reason why they don't have more home gardens. They should therefore be combined with other practices that give access to water during the dry season, namely wells or ponds.Water tanker, hand dug wells and pond construction: These technologies are adopted by some people. Most of us are carrying water from very far away. Women are always staying around their homes and if we get water we can plant vegetables, fruits, etc… and get a number of uses out of it.Fattening: it would help them us to get additional income but it is difficult to get improved breeds mainly because of the lack of funds and credit opportunities.Beehives: We all have traditional Ethiopian beehives but we need the modern bee keeping technology, planting flowering trees and vegetables around as well as having sufficient water resources. This practice should be combined with the home gardens.Women mainly focused on what happens around their house. They wish to have more home gardens that allow them to feed their families on diversified food and get some additional income. With the home gardens, which have more flowers, they could have beehives and more income. The bottleneck of their perfect landscape is access to water during the dry season and therefore linked to any water harvesting technology such as ponds and tanks as well a wells and motor pumps (to access water from perennial rivers or from the wells).In this watershed Enkri Got (Upstream) have been more users than Aba Kaloye Got (Downstream).The solution which is made by the got judge is to use water in shift basis. Therefore the decision by the kebele judge reduces conflict and makes both users. The water amount is very small to increase technologies/practices. They first put the fords on the relatively exact place along the road before drawing the rivers. The nine fords were very helpful to draw the rivers and manage the connection distance between the rivers crossing the watershed. They put major features like churches, settlements and schools in the watershed. Generally, the members' visualization and interaction was astonishing.There are natural forests scattered mainly in the upper part of the watershed: Tsehay forest (State), Belew Seged forest (communal and enclosed in 2010), Kulkuwal forest (communal and enclosed in 2010), Tila forest (Private), Agmas forest (State). The forests are mainly composed of similar tree/shrub species like Olea europaea (Woyira), Albizia gumifera (Kachona), Dodonea angustifolia (Kitkita), Carissa ed ulis (Agam), Rhus glutinosa (Embus), etc.There are also degraded lands in the watershed. These are owned by the community and concentrated in the central part of the watershed. Deforestation was the main reason for the degradation indicated by the focus group. Actually there are few scattered farmlands in those land covers still being tilled though not productive enough. Free grazing is the main feature of degraded lands in the watershed. A couple of these areas are being enclosed since 2010 for restoration and rehabilitation. Enrichment through tree planting is also being undertaken for the enclosed ones.Grazing lands are another major land cover of the watershed. There are remnant trees scattered over the grazing fields. These are situated in the upper part of the watershed called Agamye and Abozina. Cattle herds coming from inside and outside the watershed freely graze in these areas. Its degradation level is somehow moderate due to its less accessible by people around the area.The rest part of the watershed is covered by agricultural fields and settlement areas especially from middle to the lower part of the watershed.The farmers came up with the following preferred landscape: Stone terraces along the mountain and hill sides has constructed through campaign as of 2004 offseason.Two degraded areas are enclosed since 2012 for rehabilitation. Tree planting has been planted as a means of enrichment. There are also different soil and water conserving structures like micro-basins constructed on the top of newly planted seedlings. The community is also preparing to enclose other degraded areas. This is because people started to observe the multiple benefits of keeping the animals and human beings out.Irrigation practice is expanding from time to time using diversions.Around 37 farmers are using motor pumps. But they raised the recurrent failures of the motors as a serious problem. As a result the maintenance cost is high. They wish durable water pump motors to be delivered. Group members indicated bureau of agriculture should take the responsibility for the delivery of durable ones. Multipurpose tree/shrub and grass species are used as feed and for soil and water conservation. Ficus thonningii, Sesbania sesban, Elephant grass, cowpea were mentioned by the focus group members. Lack of seedling provision is a bottleneck. Multipurpose tree/shrub/grass species plantation is put as a solution for grazing land shortages.Wood lot mainly composed of Eucalyptus species due to its fast growth and high value is a common practice being exercised by the watershed community.Hand dug wells are present in the watershed. But the infrastructure is not enough to support the people and livestock in the watershed. Increasing the number of hand dug wells is a challenge: The rock bed is too near and the wells dry out before the supposed time. Technologies able to penetrate bed rocks should be used to have water wells producing year round.Water harvesting structures for supplementary irrigation is introduced by ICARDA and being implemented. The focus group assured there is huge interest to expand the practice, however the costs hindered the community to take over the practice.Large scale irrigation scheme is a desired practice by the focus group farmers. Constructing a reservoir around the middle of the watershed is suggested as an intervention. There is a large amount of command area down there. Its expensiveness to construct is a major problem. Government, NGOs and projects like ICARDA are listed to fill the gap.Gully restoration was considered as a mandatory practice while not done so far. Cemented and gabion enforced check-dams in the gullies is wished by the focus group. But due to lack of capacity to afford cement and gabion, they couldn't construct the check-dams.The focus group recommended apiculture to be practiced in the watershed. The community didn't adopt the technology due to continuing deforestations and introduction of herbicides. Enclosure, nursery establishment and manual and/or mechanical weeding are suggested interventions to be promoted by the bureau of agriculture in the watershed.Papaya, Banana, Mango, Orange, Coffee productions are the wished practices. Though a big interest and potential, lack of seedling provision, water and termite problem accounted for not implemented by the community. Nursery establishment to produce the above plants by bureau of agriculture and developmental projects is suggested as an intervention.Small poultry farms at household level are wished by the group members. Diseases and lack of medications are the hindering factors. The group recommended delivery of such services by bureau of agriculture.Mill services for grain in the watershed are wished by the farmers. Now they need to go to town. Electricity is needed as an intervention for the mill.The men's group came up with a certain amount of practices that are not yet adopted but they wish to have. Most of them are relatively big infrastructure for which the government or NGOs need to be involved, such as large scale irrigation schemes or gully stabilization with concrete check dams.Obviously the ICARDA experience shows them that it is possible to dream big.Despite modern bee hives being found in the watershed, apiculture seems to be underdeveloped due to the lack of flowering trees. Also farmers indicate that they lack seedlings for those trees. This despite the relative proximity to the governmental nursery, suggesting that the nursery does not produce the trees wished, or that the farmers are not aware of the tree nursery.Farmers would like to have more hand dug wells, and also dig some new wells but face the challenge to reach the water.There are a prospective winners and losers when the optimal watershed gets realized. Use of herbicides would be forbidden when apiculture get started. So farmers who wish to use herbicides will be losers. Honey producer farmers will also be favored.Enclosing a proposed degraded land to be rehabilitated would offend nearby farmers. These neighboring farmers are used to send their cattle to those places. So when enclosure is effected, these farmers would be obliged to keep their cattle off the place. Such upset could be considered as a loss whereas the vast community would benefit from the restoration of the areas and be considered as winners.The focus group recommended area closure around Agamye area. The people who were collecting fuel wood would lose due to the enclosure. The largest Agamye area and of course the watershed community generally do benefit from the intervention recommended.The mixed discussion was relatively short, because the focus group discussion took a very long time and everyone was tired. Each group presented its work and then the group split up. In terms of selection of practices female farmers seemed to be very individualistic following their own interests rather than representing their community. Each woman wanted to have a pump on her specific farm, rather than discussing that the community needs more pumps around the rivers, and to discuss other options for the community. It seems that with the ICARDA experience this community has just learned to ask for things rather than develop and optimal landscape.The game did not work very well, probably due to the lack of training of the facilitator, who found it difficult to handle the cards. The male group finally went through the discussion without using the cards. The necessary data was collected, but it took much longer time to go through the wished landscape, and participants seemed to have much less fun than participants in Oromia.An interesting fact is that most of the farmers in this watershed make their livelihoods from garlic, which is irrigated though a traditional river diversion scheme near to the outlet. Farmers did not mention this at all. This might be the result from not being able to play the happy strategies game correctly.than eight years old. I have got training by regional women's EPRDF conference. We are trying to work in a better way to improve our livelihood.Improved livestock breeds: Not adopted. It is not widely introduced in the area but there are very few in numbers. We know the use but thinking that there will be feed problem for them. There is also economical problem to have improved livestock breeds and manage.Orchards: I just planted apple this year and will see the use in future. We have got lesson from EPRDF conference. In this watershed there are some farmers who have apple fruit ready for sell now.Check dams: We have been doing this practice for the last three years in highlands and midlands. The lowlands are still need it but not used yet. There is an improvement which we can see on soil and water conservation in addition to soil fertility. The practice was trained by EPRDF conference.Community pond: Especially in the upland area we need community pond. It can help us for both humans and livestock. We can plant also potato, onion and other vegetables. We know the practice but do not have money.Pedal pump: It has different advantages. We can use it for vegetables and spices production. It is also less labor need and can be managed by women's. Three practices have not been adopted yet, namely improved livestock breeds, community pond and pedal pumps.Improved livestock breeds are not adopted for two reasons. Firstly it is difficult to access the improved breed variety. Secondly the improved breeds need better quality and more fodder. The watershed at this stage cannot provide sufficient high quality fodder and therefore some fodder oriented practices need to be implemented first. The women imagined a community pond in the up land and allowing farmers to irrigate their fields through a river diversion. Nice idea, but not feasible, as it is not clear where the water would come from to fill the pond. Second, with the river diversion system, most of the water is likely to be lost on its way. Clearly this was a creative idea from one of the women and not an idea pushed by the government. Unfortunately it is not a realistic option.Pedal pumps to pump water from the well are also still missing.Discussion from the men's groupThe farmers started the mapping exercise by identifying the North direction and used the school as bench march. Then they continued to map the Argenit river, then the Zefie river then the Alekit river. In terms of land use they identified the Zefie Forest (1-green) that is composed of Eucalyptus.Fridrew forest (2-green) is a community forest of eucalyptus. It has been planted for rehabilitation of the areas and livestock is kept out of the areas. Tilik meda forest (3-green) is a state owned eucalyptus forest and Kolew mareja (4-green) is a privately owned eucalyptus forest. There is a nursery established by an NGO that produced seedlings for endogenous trees. In terms of degraded area, they identied Zingero gedla (1-pink), despite of the fact that some people still make use of them, the land is very degraded and unproductive both for crop and grazing as well as Chebrew (2-pink) and Nadew (3-pink).In terms of grazing area, Eyensen god (1-grey) is a communal grazing land, where also the tree nursery is located. Model bed (2-grey) is a grazing area which during the rainy season is closed and cut and carry system is applied. claim that they cannot have more chicken, because it is too cold and lots of fecund eggs do not survive. They think that they need an incubator, which does not really help if there are power cuts and no back-up system. There might be option to get more chickens without an incubator, by keeping more chickens together during the breeding. Also as soon as the chicken population increases, disease control in needed. Expert knowledge and training would be needed to enable them to get more healthy chickens at very little costs.Like in Shambu, poultry has been mentioned in Maksenit and the same rationale applies. In addition, the home gardens combined with beehives seems to be a promising practice, as more tree are planted and income of the farmers can be diversified. For those farmers who have access to water during the dry season, the major hampering factor is the access to tree seedling other than the multipurpose tree (which they produce themselves). Cooperation should be sought with the governmental tree nursery and with ICARDA for practices that increase water access during the dry season.In Zefie, similarly to Maksenit, a combination of fruit tree with beehives is a promising combination of practices. Apple trees are already in the watershed and the knowledge is available, but no one is producing seedlings. One could approach Tana-Beles and propose that the new tree nursery also produces apple trees.For both poultry and the tree, it is not sufficient to make sure that the farmer can supply the products but also that they have sufficient market linkages. If too many fruits or chickens come on the local market, the price is likely to fall. Therefore making a functioning market linkage is crucial among the promotion of the practice. The Shambu case showed that it is relatively difficult to sell the apples, despite of their high prices in the major Ethiopian cities.Adapting the happy strategies game for farmers This focus group discussion was the first trial of the happy strategies game with communities. In general the approach went well. The mapping exercise went very well for all the focus group discussions. In Oromia region, involving women and get them actively involved was difficult. Facilitators in Amhara were asked to involve women more actively which worked well. Also women are more likely to be illiterate, making it more difficult to read the cards. After the Oromia experience, women where therefore allocated a card (whereas men could choose their cards). Every card was explained for every woman making sure that she knows what card she has. This worked better than letting them choose the cards.The game worked better in locations where farmers had a clear vision of where they want to be in 5 years from now. As such, the happy strategies tool could be a very interesting tool to involve communities as part of a longer process, if a vision building exercises is implemented beforehand.Finally, working with young people with little experience and variable level of motivation made it sometimes very difficult to implement the focus group. This also explains the difference in quality in the reporting from the different sites. But every person that contributes to the focus group in a second round, made progress. Therefore these focus group discussion should also been seen as a capacity building to our partners and our own staff in facilitation and participatory approaches. Getting a pool of facilitators who know how to implement the happy strategies game for communities could ensure better quality data collection in future."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0850393839.json b/main/part_2/0850393839.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..305f1c5609579841a3ee6c52cb90587ae5f0c878 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0850393839.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"fef86720a6211ce9cb5d72f60b24adb8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3a812d28-3cd0-4825-9e46-d8a4945a47c8/retrieve","id":"218583197"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"37775f7e-d29f-4e27-82c1-ae3daa448d82","content":"• CGIAR conducted a rapid assessment of the climate smart agriculture (CSA) impact potential on mitigation, adaptation, and productivity of five agri-food companies in three business segments, improved seeds; integrated poultry services; alternative solar energy, supported by the Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund (AECF) -a leading development organization working to reduce rural poverty and promote resilient communities and job creation in Africa.• The assessment demonstrates the investment viability of sustainable food systems by identifying CSA business models with the potential to implement and scale climate mitigation and resilience practices across several food production systems and to encourage investor matchmaking to catalyze more funding to the sector.• The current average performance of all five companies shows that most CSA KPIs' \"impact significance\" ranges from \"low-medium\" to \"medium\". As AECF support is further deployed, the significance of impacts is projected to increase 20%-65%, bringing all KPIs to \"medium\" level of significance. Productivity and adaptation show the largest improvements. Major interventions driving these changes are:o Adaptation: Climate information services (CIS), water management, and improved seed varieties. o Mitigation: Agroforestry systems, efficient use of fertilizers, and use of renewable energy sources. o Productivity: Improved agronomic practices and reduction of food losses (improved storage).• Although a significant increase in CSA impact is expected as a function of AECF support, results show that there are several opportunities to further enhance companies' CSA impacts. Supporting the implementation of these practices is especially important considering the identified potential climate hazards across AECF's portfolio, such as changes in crop suitability locations, reduced precipitation, and increased temperatures.• Further enhancing CSA impacts within the AECF portfolio can be achieved by implementing the following principles: ( 1) avoid land use change; (2) implement soil conservation practices; (3) enhance production diversity; (4) use improved crop varieties and livestock breeds; (5) efficient use of water, energy and fertilizer; (6) efficient use and conversion of feed in livestock production; (7) avoid food loss and waste; (8) use renewables; (9) use weather information; and (10) promote the participation of women and youth in value chain activities.• To support cost-effective implementation of CSA practices across the AECF portfolio of investments, we recommend the fund consider the following aspects: (i) instituting technical methodologies early in transaction selection process, (ii) clear CSA and CIS integration within business models to improve operational efficiency and reduce risk, (iii) use of climatic risk modelling for targeted technical assistance, (iv) expanding data collection and monitoring, and (v) cross-sell portfolio synergies.• This assessment provides a baseline for future comparison and identifies opportunities for reducing climate change impacts and enhancing food security across AECF's portfolio of investments in Africa.The transformation of agricultural value chains through the implementation of climate smart agriculture (CSA) practices is an important pathway for meeting global demands for food security and climate change (CCAFS, 2020). CSA practices deliver productivity, adaptation, and mitigation, which are identified as the three interlinked pillars necessary for achieving these goals. However, achieving the required systemic changes through large-scale adoption of CSA remains a challenge, especially for smallholder farmers in developing countries. Smallholder farmers need sufficient finance, technical assistance, and skills to implement and maintain improved production practices.By supporting over 375 businesses in 26 countries over the past 13 years in Sub-Saharan Africa, impacting more than 30 million lives, creating over 27,000 direct jobs, and leveraging US$ 771 million in matching funds, the African Enterprise Climate Fund (AECF) can serve as a critical driver of CSA-oriented agricultural transformation on the continent. To date, the potential to harness climate change and food security co-benefits in the AECF portfolio has not been analyzed comprehensively. Understanding the investment impacts of current activities and the key factors affecting those impacts could help increase and scale up support for farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate shocks as well as enhance food security impacts in future investments.CGIAR conducted a rapid assessment of CSA's impact potential on 1) the mitigation, adaptation, and productivity key performance indicators (KPIs) of five agri-food companies supported by AECF in West and East Africa; 2) the major climate hazards; and 3) the financials of the five companies (Figure 1).The objective was to provide a rapid assessment of the potential impacts of AECF's portfolio of investments on (i) agriculture productivity, mitigation and adaptation of representative samples of commercial agriculture companies and selected value chains; (ii) identify key agriculture mitigation and adaptation options appropriate to the investments; (iii) support learning among companies on agriculture priorities and opportunities for reducing climate impacts and enhancing food security; and iv) encourage investor matchmaking in the region by identifying CSA business models with the potential to implement and scale climate mitigation and resilience practices across several food production systems.The selected companies' business models were clustered in the following three areas:• Improved seeds: The three commercial seed companies assessed specialize in the production, processing and supply of improved/hybrid maize, legume and vegetable crop seeds for smallholder farmers, operating in Ghana, Malawi and Mozambique. The seed companies sell climate-resilient seeds (mainly drought-tolerant varieties) in addition to other improved varieties such as bio-fortified seeds (high in vitamin-A) and pest and diseaseresistant seeds. In addition to their seed products, their package includes technical assistance on the use of improved seeds and good agricultural management practices.• Integrated poultry services: One company specializes in the provision of integrated poultry services in rural Tanzania, mainly through the commercialization of day-old chicks, maintaining parent stock farms, feed mill operations and providing extension and veterinary services for smallholder farmers. Its package includes dayold chicks, animal feed, vaccinations, vitamins and antibiotics for poultry, equipment (feeders and drinkers) and a guidebook for appropriate livestock management. Its feed mill operations consist of buying poultry feed from aggregators based in Tanzania, Kenya, and Malawi. The company plans to start contract farming for its own feed production.• Alternative solar energy: A solar irrigation technology company offers added value services such as sales, financing, delivery, installation, after sale service and software. The current markets are in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania. It is implementing climate adaptation and resilience through solar-powered irrigation technologies, growing more on the same area, moving to high value crops, improved quality, and increasing water usage efficiency. The company also offers advisory services, technical support to its product end users and technical training on renewable energy resources as bundled products. With irrigation, the farmers are no longer dependent on unreliable rainfall, hence they can move from one to three seasons per year and diversify their crops from low value to high value.This rapid assessment technique is intended for contexts where aggregate data is available on agricultural land use and management practices. The method indicates the directions of CSA effects among companies' interventions, cropping systems and value chains. As such, the results provide evidence on companies' trends in the selected value chains, rather than a comprehensive or precise mitigation, adaptation, and productivity footprint of the company's operations. An in-depth due diligence assessment would need to be performed on the selected entities to further determine their financial performance under the instituted CSA activities and hence their attractiveness for investment.The CSA impact of selected companies was estimated using the CGIAR CSA Screening Tool.Through key multiple-choice questions, the Excel TMbased tool qualitatively assesses the potential impact on adaptation, mitigation and productivity KPIs, considering current actions and future interventions of agri-food companies. This results in an overall score as follows:• High: By implementing the proposed climatesmart interventions, the investee is likely to achieve significant impact on the KPIs. • Medium: By implementing the proposed climate-smart interventions, the investee is likely to achieve moderate impact on the KPIs. • Low: By implementing the proposed climatesmart interventions, the investee is likely to achieve low impact on the KPIs.These key questions relate to the level of implementation of interventions on:• Mitigation (greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction: use of farming inputs (e.g., fertilizers), land use change, soil tillage, crop management, and energy. • Adaptation: climate information services, climate hazards, water use and management, job creation and soil management. • Productivity: increase in productivity and management of food loss and waste.Due to a lack of existing field data, the primary method of data collection was based on interviews with all five companies.Climate hazard analysis was performed on a single representative company selected from each of the clustered areas of improved seeds, integrated poultry services and alternative solar energy solutions.For the selected company in the improved seeds cluster, projected monthly temperature (average of minimum and maximum temperature) and precipitation values from an average of three different global circulation models (GCMs; MRI-ESM2-0, CanESM5 and MIROC6) for the 1970-2010 and 2021-2040 time periods under the SSP245 scenario, were used as the input to compute the suitability for the crop for the 2021-2040 time period and for the 1970-2010 time period (Ecocrop -Regional Agronomy). (This is a Shared Socioeconomic Pathway, wherein the assumption is that global social, technological, and economic trends will not The suitability values for the 1970-2010 period were resampled using a bilinear approach to align the spatial resolution of each pixel with that of the suitability values derived from the 2021-2040 period.Once the spatial resolutions were aligned, a differential value of suitability for each pixel was computed using the 2021-2040 suitability value compared with that of the 1970-2010 suitability value.For the integrated poultry services case, administrative units (\"locations\") where poultry feed is cultivated and where the poultry is maintained were obtained. Similarly, for the alternative solar energy solutions cluster, locations where the solar energy solution is sold were obtained. Monthly temperature (an average of minimum and maximum temperature) and precipitation differentials were computed by calculating the difference between projected climate for 2021-2040 period compared with that of 1970-2010 period.Like the improved seeds cluster, the projected climate for the 2021-2040 scenario was obtained by averaging the outputs from three different global circulation models (GCMs/MRI-ESM2-0, CanESM5 and MIROC6) under the SSP245 scenario from the CMIP6 project. The temperature and precipitation differential values were computed for each pixel (spatial resolution of 4.5 square kilometers at the equator) of the selected administrative units. An arithmetic mean for each administrative unit was calculated by averaging the differential values of each pixel belonging to the respective administrative unit.As part of the assessment, the capital structures of the entities were analyzed to determine the mix of concessional capital to commercial capital. Where possible, the financial performance was assessed to determine whether the business models are financially sustainable and thus attractive for commercial investors.The assessment also allowed CGIAR to analyze whether previous expenditure went towards CSA interventions and, where possible, if this had an impact on the entity's financial performance in the context of mitigating the impacts of climate hazards.The analysis was done based on past three-year financial performance and complemented with company interviews.The average performance of all five companies shows that the current CSA impact significance ranges from low-medium to medium-high across the CSA pillars. As AECF support is further deployed, companies are projected to increase the significance of their CSA impacts by 20%-65%, leading all KPIs to \"medium\" level of significance, with productivity and adaptation having the largest improvements (Figure 2). The provision of climate information services (CIS), water management, conservational tillage, improved varieties, and increase in jobs (to benefit morelivelihoods with additional income) were significant drivers of enhanced climate adaptation. For mitigation, the implementation of agroforestry systems, efficient use of synthetic fertilizers and management of livestock as well as implementation of renewable sources of energy were used. Reduction in food loss and waste (improved storage) and use of improved seed varieties have also been reported as major interventions increasing agriculture productivity.Interestingly, none of the companies interviewed has a system in place to monitor CSA impacts from operations and only two knew how much their services and products affect crop productivity.Although a significant increase in CSA impact is expected as a function of AECF support, results clearly show that there are several opportunities to further enhance the companies' CSA impacts (Figure 3). The implementation of these CSA practices is especially important considering the identified potential climate hazards these value chains are projected to face in the coming years, such as changes in crop suitability locations, reduced precipitation, and increased temperatures.The analyses and recommendations for each of the company clusters to improve their likelihood of achieving higher CSA impacts along with economic returns are presented in the next sections.Cluster 1: Improved seedsCurrently, the seed companies' interventions are likely to have promoted ''low to medium'' impact significance across the productivity, adaptation, and mitigation CSA KPIs (Figure 3). Mitigation is the CSA pillar with the highest level of impact significance (medium), followed by productivity (low) and adaptation (low). With AECF support, the significance of the impacts tends to increase and balance out across the CSA KPIs (medium-high) because of both additional practices and expansion of current practices.Mitigation: The major CSA interventions driving the estimated impacts on mitigation are related to the adoption of agroforestry (one company in less than 30% of the area of influence), restoration of degraded lands (practiced by three companies), followed by the protection of forest ecosystem and avoided conversion of natural landscapes (practice by two companies), and the use of renewable energy sources adopted by two companies. These interventions and their level of adoption are likely to have promoted a medium to high mitigation significance impact on this pillar (Table 1).The protection of natural landscapes avoids GHG emissions through carbon sequestered in trees and soils, especially in high-carbon landscapes, whereas the use of renewables usually displaces fossil fuels (e.g., diesel), avoiding the GHG emissions from transportation and combustion of fossil fuels (IPCC, 2006;2019).Additional mitigation has also been potentially achieved with the adoption of agroforestry and improved animal feeding using crop residues (Table 1). The adoption of agroforestry and land restoration have the capacity to remove carbon from the atmosphere and sequester it in above-and belowground biomass (Feliciano et al., 2018). Animal feeding tends to optimize feed quantity and quality, increasing food conversion (productivity), consequently reducing losses of carbon and nitrogen and GHG emissions per unit of product (Herrero et al., 2016).In the coming years, companies expect to additionally (i) expand actions to improve animal feeding (one company with above 30% herds) and (ii) implement soil analysis to support fertilizer use by up to 70% of the business area for two companies. Soil analysis data can help balance soil nutrient inputs to match crop nutrient requirements to improve productivity without compromising environmental quality. This practice may reduce over-application and increase the effectiveness of fertilizer application, especially nitrogen, that may otherwise lead to N2O emissions, a powerful GHG (IPCC, 2006). The single most important practice for minimizing N2O emissions is the right rate. These additional practices should enhance CSA impacts significantly to medium-high (Figure 4).Adaptation: The CSA interventions supporting adaptation to climate change relate to the adoption of improved soil management practices (e.g., implementation of cover crops), followed by access to climate information services and identification of climate hazards (e.g., weather forecasting as observed for three companies. In the future, with AECF support (Table 1), the job creation potential for the three companies will be higher than it is currently.The use of irrigation (two companies) and promotion of product diversification have also been mentioned as interventions promoted by companies. Although many activities have been taking place, the extent of these is still limited (less than 30% across the area of influence), resulting in a low impact significance on the adaptation pillar (Table 1; Figure 4).With AECF support, the adaptation impact significance can increase to medium as companies are likely to expand the adoption of those practices, especially irrigation, soil management (from less than 30% to more than 70% of the business area), diversification of production/income, and adoption of water management practices, such the implementation of rainwater harvesting. These expected interventions will likely generate an increased number of jobs (over 70%) along the value chain (Table 1).Improved agri-advisories, weather forecasting and water use and management, especially on improved irrigation systems such as drip irrigation are promising interventions for climate adaptation. These practices and interventions have the potential to support producers to manage climate risks over the coming years by helping inform decisions by farmers, agri-businesses, investors, and policy makers with implications over a range of timeframes, from short-term tactical to long-term strategic (Howden et al., 2007).Irrigation is especially important during dry spells.Sustainable water management will guarantee future crop irrigation needs using appropriate irrigation technologies. Improved water management can also improve water quantity, quality and availability for industrial (manufacturing and packaging) and general societal use.Productivity: Current practices have increased crop productivity by less than 30%, but with additional practices, it is expected that productivity will increase more than 30%, especially with the use of improved seed varieties. In addition, two companies reported having measures to avoid food loss and waste using improved storage, but in less than 30% of the business area; and only one company is likely to expand those measures in the short-term.Post-harvest losses can occur at every point along the value chain (e.g., during storage, processing, and transporting). Such losses decrease the amount of available food, and also waste the resources used to produce the lost food that emits GHG (CCAFS, 2020).Although several CSA interventions have been supported and planned by the improved seeds companies, there are still significant opportunities to deliver further CSA impacts (Table 1; Figure 4).Promising opportunities for companies working on improved seeds to cope with climate hazards and enhance their CSA impacts include expanding interventions related to agroforestry (mitigation) and access to CIS and water management (adaptation) (Table 1).These interventions could help promote higher carbon sequestration in trees and soils (Feliciano et al., 2018;IPCC, 2006), improve farmers' ability to manage climate risks and make decisions (Howden et al., 2007), support better water use and irrigation management, especially during off-seasons of low rain, and enhance productivity.In designing further adoption of CSA practices, companies should also take into consideration the potential climate variability in the region.According to the climate hazard analysis, it is expected that due to projected climate variability, future suitability of crops across locations may change. The crop suitability analysis for each crop revealed a reduction in suitability across large parts of cultivated areas for maize, groundnut, pigeon pea, mung bean and sesame due to the combined effects of temperature and precipitation changes. This therefore warrants finding new and improved varieties that can tolerate abiotic stresses.The scale in the suitability maps (Figure 4 The suitability maps (figure 4) could be used to validate possible expansion strategies and identification of potential customer segments to improve existing business models. Other critical variables such as solar irradiance and water table levels will be incorporated in the upcoming version of the assessment tool.All companies' financial structures are composed of a mix of grants, debt (both senior and mezzanine) alongside equity, mostly shareholder based. The observed 3 year capital structure of the three companies had a maximum of 10% equity, 20-30% grants, and 60-70% debt. The average number of years of company operations was 6.5 years. Revenue of the three companies for the past 3 years have plateaued while costs have increased year on year at an average rate of 13%.The financial performance of the three companies remained subdued from a profitability and cashflow standpoint. Competition within the operating geographies has increased, reducing the gross-profit margin. Based on our assessment, improved production and efficiency can result in a positive impact on financial performance and reduction of cashflow variability. This can be achieved via targeted inclusion of certain CSA practices, especially related to the productivity pillar (such as a reduction in food loss waste through storage) and monitoring the identified climatic hazards to mitigate future risks and unintended losses in production that could negatively impact future cash flows. Usage of appropriate seed varieties coupled with appropriate planting approaches and correct fertilizer and insecticide application could lead to increased yields. Efficient water management via irrigation could further reduce the variability of yields and in turn, improve the financial performance of the companies.Cluster 2: Integrated poultry servicesCurrently, the integrated poultry services company's interventions are likely to have promoted low to high impacts across the productivity, adaptation, and mitigation CSA pillars.Mitigation is the CSA KPI with the highest impact significance (high), followed by adaptation and productivity (low). With AECF support, these pillars tend to increase their impact significance to lowmedium and high, as additional interventions and the expansion of current practices take place (Figure 5).Mitigation: The current medium impact on mitigation is attributed to the company's technical assistance to improve livestock (poultry) and manure management (chicken waste for compost), recovery of degraded lands, and implementation of agroforestry systems (fruit tree planting and home gardening in 30% to 70% of the area). Renewable energy adoption, although not significant, is also a mitigation intervention that has been supported by the company.With these interventions, the company has promoted higher carbon sequestration in trees and soils and reduced emissions due to more efficient livestock management (Feliciano et al., 2018;Herrero et al., 2016;IPCC, 2006).Potential negative impacts on mitigation may result from the company's insufficient knowledge on its impact on land use change. Therefore, improvements in impact monitoring are especially important for guiding future actions and investments, which are now focused on the adoption of soil analysis for fertilizer application for up to 30% to 70% of the area and expanding livestock and manure management as the business rolls out across the country.Using soil analysis to support the use of fertilizers is critical to avoiding the over-application of fertilizers and applying the right rate, especially nitrogen, which may mitigate emissions of N2O (IPCC, 2006).Adaptation: The current low-medium impact on adaptation is attributed to the CIS interventions that are building resilience to non-climatic hazards (e.g., disease resistance through poultry vaccinations and antibiotics included in the package) and climatic hazards (e.g., supporting tree planting to mitigate heat stress for poultry). These interventions have potentially improved farmers' ability to manage climate risks and make decisions (Howden et al., 2007). 2). Productivity: Although the company has the potential for having a high impact on productivity by providing poultry vaccine products and veterinary extension services, which could substantially decrease animal mortality and improve productivity, the current lowmedium significance impact on productivity corresponds to the company's lack of information on this impact.Although several CSA interventions have been supported by the company, there are still significant opportunities to deliver greater CSA impacts (Table 2; Figure 6). Promising opportunities to cope with climate hazards and enhance CSA impacts include adopting interventions related to nutrient management and renewable energy (mitigation), water and soil management, and irrigation (Table 2).These interventions would help reduce CO2 emissions resulting from using fossil fuels for energy generation, N2O emission by over-fertilization of crops, and support better irrigation management during seasons of low rainfall, thus also protecting water sources.The company has potential to further increase its impact on mitigation by supporting renewable energy adoption, for example, by using chicken waste for biogas production. Implementing water reutilization techniques could also minimize eventual negative impacts of the increase in water use for farmers (because poultry farming being waterintensive).The adoption of irrigation and conservation agricultural practices may also help farmers to produce more food and enhance soil quality. Furthermore, implementing a system to monitor CSA KPIs impacts seems especially important for the company.In designing further adoption of CSA practices, companies should also take into consideration of the potential climate variability in the region, i.e., the potential temperature variability expected in the region in the coming years.Climate hazard analysis shows that in comparison to 1970-2010, locations where either poultry is maintained or where poultry feed is produced are projected to experience an average increase in temperature by ~1.3 degrees centigrade and precipitation by ~3.5 millimeters in 2021-2040.Within location comparisons reveals that one specific location is projected to experience much more spatial variability in projected temperature and precipitation values in comparison to the other. Therefore, poultry genotypes that have improved tolerance to high temperatures, and can adapt to changes in feed, would be more suitable in future scenarios. Guidance on improved CSA pathways relevant to the investments is discussed in the next chapter.The company's financial structure is composed of a mix of grants, debt (both senior and mezzanine), and equity, mostly shareholder based. The capital structure was heavily skewed towards concessional capital, but over the past three years, the company has raised commercial debt, both in the form of short-term working capital and a long-term facility.The long-term facility currently has a principal moratorium which expires in the next two years. The importance of this is that, given the subdued financial performance over the past two years, coupled with significant cashflow variability, the company can increase sales of day-old chicks while reducing the cost of production by focusing on two critical areas: (i) improved hatching efficiency via adoption of renewable powered modern incubators to replace traditional incubators; and (ii) maintaining an efficient feed mix ratio.To improve egg production, the components of their feed mix which they seek to grow inhouse will need to be implemented in conjunction with specific CSA practices to ensure reliable yield throughout the year in planting geographies that experience significant climatic hazards such as heat stress and limited water availability.Cluster 3: Alternative solar energyAll CSA pillars have a similar level of impact significance as depicted in the alternative solar energy company (medium). With AECF support, impacts are expected to increase their significance slightly, especially mitigation (medium-high), as additional interventions and the expansion of current practices are implemented (Figure 6). Mitigation: Besides implementing a renewable source of energy that replaces diesel generators and pumps and avoid emissions of CO2, the company reported building the capacity of clients to recover degraded lands, implement agroforestry systems through fruit tree planting and home gardening, and improve animal management through rotational grazing and increasing livestock feed.As this company rolls out its services, additional practices will focus on forest protection, recovery of degraded lands, and nutrient management, which will likely increase the mitigation significance potential of the company to medium-high.Adaptation: The CSA interventions that have favored adaptation in this cluster relate to diversification of production and increased income sources, increased employment, and irrigation enhancement, followed by access to CIS and identification of climate hazards (e.g., weather forecasting) and improved soil management practices (e.g., implementation of cover crops).With the support of AECF, the adaptation impact significance under CIS, diversification of production and incomes, irrigation, and job creation opportunities for the company may be unchanged or show a slight increase as the company is likely to adopt additional interventions, especially in water and soil management (from less than 30% to about 70% of the business area) (Table 3).Productivity: Current practices have increased productivity in at least 30% of the area. An additional opportunity for higher productivity is measures to avoid food loss, for example, with the implementation of improved harvesting, transportation, and storage systems.Although several CSA interventions have been supported or planned by the alternative solar energy solutions company, there are still significant opportunities to deliver further CSA impacts (Table 3; Figure 7). Promising opportunities to cope with climate hazards and enhance resilience include expanding interventions related to agroforestry and nutrient management (mitigation), access to CIS and water management (adaptation), and food loss measures (Table 1). Current score Future score et al., 2018;IPCC, 2006), improve farmers' ability to manage climate risks and make decisions (Howden et al., 2007), and enhance productivity. However, in designing further adoption of CSA practices, the company should also take into consideration the potential climate variability in the region.Climate hazard analysis reveals that locations where the solar powered water pumps are being sold are projected to experience reduced precipitation (by ~2 millimeters) and increased temperatures (by ~1.45 mm) in 2021-2040 in comparison to 1970-2010. This suggests that these locations are well suited for the sale of solar powered water pumps.The capital structure of the company had debt and grants as its main components, with debt accounting for 40-50% and grants for 35-40% on average for the past three years. The balance was composed of equity ranging from 10%-25%. Financial performance of the company improved over the past two years due to increased uptake of solar powered irrigation units by farmers in Kenya, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and Uganda. The current business model relies on farmers using harvest sales to repay the loan advanced to purchase the irrigation kit. Low production for farmers continues to cause cash constraints and poor servicing of the loan facility if used to procure the solar irrigation units. To address a possible situation where farmers are unable to pay for the units due to poor harvests, it is crucial for the company to actively participate in ensuring the CSA practices advised by the extension workers are executed.There are several options to enhance CSA impacts across the AECF portfolio of investments in agri-food systems. Figure 7 above shows core, economically feasible agriculture value-chain interventions that may enable future AECF investments to enhance CSA impacts.These interventions will simultaneously provide cobenefits across multiple dimensions, such as soil health, water quality, GHG mitigation and productivity. However, CSA practices are context specific and usually applied in tandem so that no single practice can guarantee impacts on all CSA pillars.Therefore, we recommend that improved CSA pathways relevant to the investments be initiated through the use of checklists applying the following principles:• Avoid land use change.• Implement soil conservation practices.• Enhance production diversity.• Use improved crop varieties and livestock breeds. • Efficient use of water, energy, and fertilizer.• Efficient use and conversion of feed in livestock production. • Avoid food loss or waste.• Increase use of renewables.• Use of weather information.To support cost-effective implementation of CSA practices across the AECF portfolio of investments, we recommend the fund consider the following six actions: (i) instituting technical methodologies in transaction selection, (ii) clear CSA and CIS integration within the business model to improve efficiency and reduce risk, (iii) use climatic risk modeling combined with CSA and CIS technical assistance, (iv) expand data collection and monitoring, and (v) cross-sell portfolio synergies (Table 4). A significant opportunity exists where companies within AECF's portfolio could provide CSA based solutions to other companies in need of them. We identified four critical cross selling opportunities that could be harnessed for the companies Improving understanding of AECF companies' CSA impacts requires further improvements in data collection for different value-chain levels, especially on-farm data. None of the companies interviewed has a system in place to monitor CSA impacts from its operations and few know how much their services and products are affecting crop productivity.In this context, for better planning and decisionmaking, AECF reporting could be designed to capture more climate-relevant information, particularly for land use change, management of crop and pasture areas (e.g., soil management), level of farm inputs (e.g., energy and nitrogen fertilizer), and energy and water use.Finally, increasing the capacity to gather quantitative information would allow the use of more sophisticated approaches to achieve CSA impacts and produce recommendations.To institutionalize the recommendations outlined in Table 4, it is recommended that investors modify the existing investment screening and due diligence process to incorporate climate risk modelling and CSA impact assessments. This will help identify, early on, appropriate risk-mitigating interventions and align portfolios with climate goals by ensuring impact and risks are measured and monitored over time.Furthermore, this could improve exit strategies for investment portfolios by demonstrating evidence of impact and thereby attract larger sources of climate finance.Figure 8 below outlines the additional steps that we recommend incorporating into a typical investment decision-making process.The rapid assessment of the potential CSA impacts of five companies operating in West and East Africa shows that AECF support is likely to be enhancing farmers' crop and livestock production while reducing the emissions of GHG and better adapting them to climate change.Furthermore, there are several opportunities to further enhance companies' CSA impacts. A deep dive into the interventions supported by the fund is recommended for improving the certainty of estimates and better guide future decision-making of future investments.from the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank. IDA helps the world's poorest countries by providing grants and low to zerointerest loans for projects and programs that boost economic growth, reduce poverty, and improve poor people's lives. IDA is one of the largest sources of assistance for the world's 76 poorest countries, 39 of which are in Africa. Annual IDA commitments have averaged about $21 billion over circa 2017-2020, with approximately 61 percent going to Africa."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0863012355.json b/main/part_2/0863012355.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f53bed757cb9762686cab510d15de8b5aaf7322 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0863012355.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"058f013471c0f06b86272e94e83ceb31","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7722ebaa-bd11-4932-b732-1cf4d5c850aa/retrieve","id":"1144638227"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"50cd8f0c-a4b3-40b8-98cd-9f635d901080","content":"This work is based on the presentation Cases of successful adoption of agricultural water management interventions: What can we learn?' by Barron et al., at the Third International Forum on Water and Food, held from November 14 to 17, 2011, in Tshwane, South Africa, and the review by Douxchamps et al. (2014) Taking stock of forty years of agricultural water management interventions in smallholder systems of Burkina Faso. Ultimately, we seek to address a knowledge gap on what technologies are in use, and what large-scale impacts on yields can be explained by this technology uptake.Figure 1: Map of the study area Figure 2: Classification of agricultural water management (AWM) technologies Figure 3: Distribution of small reservoirs according to date of construction Figure 4a: Proportion of fields using SWC in 1993 Figure 4b: Proportion of fields using SWC in 2006 Figure 5: Small reservoirs and SWC Figure 6a: Yield (kg/ha) by region, for major cereal crops Figure 6b: Cultivated area (ha) by region, for major cereal crops Figure 7: Total cereal production per capita Figure 8: Comparison of rain-fed cereal yields with SWC adoption Figure 9: Comparison of rice yield with number of small reservoirs Figure 10: Proportional (%) change in poverty and AWM Figure 11: Rate of coverage of food needs (%) per region Figure 12: Impact pathway for the various aspects of the evolution of AWM projects Figure 13: Distribution of small reservoirs against population density Tables Table 1: Characteristics of recorded reservoirs in Burkina Faso Table 2: Growth of storage volume in small reservoirs Table 3: Summary of the area of SWC measures in use Table 4: Adoption of SWC by region Table 5: Trends in major cereal yields Table 6: Trends in major cereal production per capita Table 7: Characteristics of the trends in cereal yield and SWC adoption Table 8: Characteristics of the trends in rice yield and reservoir construction Table 9: Poverty level and AWM expansionSince the 1970s, significant investments have been made in the Volta basin to develop and promote a range of agricultural water management (AWM) technologies in order to improve food productivity, food security and farmers' income in the face of extreme rainfall variability and severe droughts (Douxchamps et al. 2012(Douxchamps et al. , 2014)). Substantial experimental evidence is available at the field scale showing high potential to increase crop production and productivity (e.g., Zougmoré et al. 2000aZougmoré et al. , b, 2003Zougmoré et al. , 2004Zougmoré et al. , 2005Zougmoré et al. , 2010;;Kaboré and Reij 2004; Barry et al. 2008;Sawadogo 2011). At the same time, a growing body of regional research on the \"greening of the Sahel\" suggests widespread improvement in biomass production, and that this improvement is possibly linked to the uptake and adoption of AWM technologies (e.g., Haglund et al. 2011;Bégué et al. 2011;Olsson et al. 2005;Herrmann et al. 2005). Yet, fundamental data gaps persist, e.g., have smallholder farmers adopted agricultural water management technologies to scale? 1 Whereas it is fairly easy to access information on the amount and locations of land degradation (e.g., the GLASOD project, ISRIC 2013), it is less straightforward to find evidence of where farmers already practice specific AWM technologies to scale. The location and rate of specific AWM technology adoption to scale is neither well understood nor systematically documented. This knowledge gap can lead to various misunderstandings on needs for research and investments in technology out scaling, both by researchers and development agents. The objective of this study is to determine whether evidence can be found at an intermediate scale between the field and the sub-continent for the past and current expansion and impact of AWM technologies. This study is targeted to one level below national, which in Burkina Faso is the administrative unit of regions.The two questions addressed in this study are;i) What is the evidence of the adoption and spread of various AWM technologies among smallholder farmers (in areal extent) over the past 30 years? Can adoption be located in space and quantified over time?ii) Can any impacts on crop production (yield) and/or secondary impacts on rural poverty be discerned in relation to the expansion of AWM technologies?In Section 1, a review approach is applied to address the above mentioned questions, focusing on northern and central Burkina Faso. Section 2 describes the data processing carried out and assumptions made. Sections 3 and 4 present the results of the expansion of AWM technologies and the temporal development of key cereal yields, poverty rates and food security indices in the study area. A discussion follows in Section 5, and a summary and recommendations are presented in Section 6.This study used a comparative approach to establish preliminary relationships based on the available evidence and to assess the state of the data to determine what is required for a more rigorous analysis. The scope of the study was guided by the convergence of greening studies on the northwestern part of Burkina Faso, and a typology of AWM interventions used in the Volta Basin. Data on AWM use, crop yields and poverty indicators was collated or derived from secondary sources and then analyzed for relationships between AWM adoption and impact on the well-being of farmers.The study area was informed by the convergence of results from greening studies highlighting a 'hotspot' of greening in northwestern Burkina Faso, an area covering parts of the Nord, Plateau-Central, Centre-Nord and Mouhoun regions. The practice of zai and stone rows as soil and water conservation (SWC) interventions is said to have been particularly successful in this area too (Kaboré and Reij 2004;Atampugre 1993). The final study area was expanded to cover the semi-arid area of Burkina Faso, where agricultural water management is an important strategy for enhancing smallholder farmers' income generation and food security (D'haen 2012). The spread of AWM adoption has also been suggested as substantial in this area (Douxchamps et al. 2014). The study area was defined as the regions with more than half their surface area receiving between 400 and 800 mm rainfall per year, according to the mean rainfall isohyets described in Ouedraogo et al. (2006) for the period 1971-2000. The regions, therefore, included in this analysis are Sahel, Nord, Centre-Nord, Mouhoun, Est and the Plateau-Central (see Figure 1). The total surface area studied is 161 865 km 2 . small electric/diesel pumps for smallholder irrigation iii) soil and water conservation (SWC) Small reservoirs were defined as dammed reservoirs with a capacity of <1 million m 3 (Cecchi et al. 2009;De Condappa et al. 2008a). Small reservoirs are used for multiple purposes, including irrigation, fishing and livestock watering (Sally et al. 2011). Smaller, ephemeral ponds, which are elusive to record, are particularly important for complementary irrigation during the post-rainy season period. In 2001, there were a total of 881 geo-referenced small reservoirs with a known volume in Burkina Faso. An additional 440 reservoirs are recorded in the database with no known volume. It was suggested by De Condappa et al. ( 2008a) that these reservoirs are most likely small reservoirs. Thus, results of this study are based on the minimum amount of stored water and therefore likely to underestimate the impact of small reservoirs on livelihoods. Note that Venot et al. ( 2012) suggested serious discrepancies in the locations of small reservoirs captured in different data sets, so these records can be considered a \"best estimate\".Source: Douxchamps et al. (2012) Soil and water conservation (SWC)Soil and water conservation (SWC) interventions incorporate a range of technologies for reducing soil erosion and improving soil moisture infiltration for crop and plant growth, including the zai (halfmoons), various reduced-tillage practices and tied ridging, earth/stone rows and vegetation strips (live hedges), which are commonly used in the Volta basin (see Figure 2). Two SWC interventions, i) stone bunds (Atampugre 1993) and ii) the revived traditional practice of planting pits known as zai (Reij et al. 2009) in particular, have been substantially promoted in externally-funded projects. AWM interventions using mineral (soil) material and live hedges at the micro-catchment (in-field) level were also included in this study.The three principal sources of data that were used in the study to synthesize The analysis of small reservoir development used a database of reservoirs in Burkina Faso, compiled by Cecchi (2008) as part of the Small Reservoir Project and based on data supplied by Direction Générale des Ressources en Eau (DGRE) and Ministère de l' Agriculture, de l'Hydraulique et des Ressources Halieutiques (MAHRH). This database holds records of dates of construction, total capacity and other characteristics of 1,453 dammed reservoirs (in total), across Burkina Faso that were built up until 2001 and that vary in size from 9.7 million m 3 to 15 m 3 . The database is available on the BFP Volta Data Disc (De Condappa et al. 2008b). A valuable analysis of the database and the small reservoir context was obtained from Cecchi et al. (2009) andVenot et al. (2012).Consistent quantitative data about soil and water conservation (SWC) adoption by farmers across the country is available from the annual national agricultural survey (Enquête Permanente Agricole, EPA), which records, for each agricultural household sampled, the number of fields on which farmers utilize any form of anti-erosive measures, including stone barriers, earth dams, zai (half-moons) and hedging (live or dead). The proportion of fields utilizing SWC measures provides an indicator for estimating regional adoption of SWC. Statistics for the provincial level (% of fields) are published for 1993 (INSD 1994).The yield (kg ha -1 ) produced and the area planted for major cereal crops were reproduced from the AgriSTAT database series for 1984-2004(DGPER 2008) ) and the INSD regional series for 1995-2008(INSD 2013a, 2012c)). Millet, sorghum, maize and rice were selected as being the main staple crops produced in the region for food and income.Poverty indices have been published for 1994for , 1998for and 2003for , based on national household surveys (MEF 2000;;INSD 2012b). To complement each poverty index, ownership of agricultural equipment and animal draft power was collated from household and agricultural surveys for 1993for , 2003for and 2007for (INSD 1994for , 2003for , 2007)), following Moll's (2005) analysis of livestock as insurance, financing, a savings mechanism and a status symbol.A second complementary index of poverty is food security. In addition to D'haen's research (2012), Botoni and Reij (2009) found that villagers' perceptions of their own poverty level were often defined by characteristics of food security. Regional food security data, estimated by the Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie (INSD) as the proportion of cereal demand (in %) met by production and published in regional periodic reports (INSD 2012a), is analyzed for the period 1992-2006.Soil and water conservation (SWC) adoption for 2006 (% of fields using SWC measures) was calculated from raw EPA survey data (MAHRH and DGPSA 2007). Provincial level adoption was calculated as the number of fields using any form of anti-erosive measure as a proportion of the total number of fields surveyed in 2006/7. Regional level statistics for both 1993 and 2006 were calculated as the area-weighted average of the provincial statistics, using available provincial level cropland area from the Ministère de l' Agriculture et des Ressources Animales (MARA) agricultural survey reports for the closest year (1993( : INSD 1994;;2004/5: MAHRH et al. 2006)).Academic journal databases (Scopus, Science Direct, ISI Web of Science) were searched for supplementary studies reporting independently surveyed areas of agricultural land (in hectares) on which SWC technologies have been or are still being implemented to complement the national overview of SWC adoption. We used the keywords \"zai\", \"stone bunds\", \"soil and water conservation\", \"anti-erosion\" and \"Burkina Faso\". Of the 75 articles found, most report the results of field trials (see Appendix A2) and do not have a record of the adoption of agricultural water management (AWM) technologies by farmers. Excluded articles were related to work in countries other than Burkina Faso or were not explicitly related to SWC. The project reports published by international organizations responsible for promoting SWC measures since the 1970s (PATECORE 2004;Atampugre 1993;IFAD 2004) provided the number of hectares of agricultural land treated by the projects, although the overall areal extent encompassed by a particular project was not always clearly defined. Using the information available, we derived an estimated percentage of coverage by calculating the hectares treated as a percentage of the total area cultivated with cereals and using available regional level data from the agricultural survey reports for the season closest to the publication of the reports (MAHRH et al. 2006). In project-treated areas covering several regions, the percentage apportioned to each region was area-weighted by the cultivated area. It should be noted that these estimates do not account for any adoption beyond the project's direct intervention and therefore could be underestimates. Nonetheless, the statistics provide a counterpoint to the national statistics presented.The yield (kg ha -1 ) was calculated at the regional level from the average total production (t) and average total crop area (ha) of the provinces within each region. Cereal production per person was calculated using regional population statistics for 1996-2006(INSD 2013b)). For all agricultural statistics, a 5-year moving average was calculated, and then the time series was normalized to the first year of the series,before comparing it to the small reservoir and SWC development trends.Of the 1,453 reservoirs recorded in the Cecchi (2008) database, 881 are small reservoirs with a storage capacity of less than 1 million m 3 ; 74% of those have less than 300 000 m 3 . Although accounting for the majority of reservoirs by number (61% of the 1,453), small reservoirs only hold 3.5% of Burkina Faso's total storage volume (Table 1a) and only 3% of the total storage volume in the study area (Table 1b).Overall the dataset is still incomplete, with 30% of reservoir entries not having information on volume. Moreover, cross-referencing between remote-sensing, field surveys and national reports revealed the difficulties in collecting a comprehensive inventory of reservoirs, with the location of reservoirs being at most 30% consistent between the sources of data (Venot et al. 2012). Nonetheless, the dataset provides a general guideline and the best current estimate of small reservoir development over the past 50 years. In the study area, the rate of development of small reservoirs increased rapidly after the droughts of the 1970s (Table 2, Figure 3). On average, over 85% of small reservoirs were built after 1970, with intense development occurring on the central plateau during the 1980s in particular when 50% of small reservoirs in Nord, Centre-Nord and Plateau-Central were built. The Est region had an early period of higher development (1950s-1960s) in addition to the 1980s boom, which continued into the 1990s. In Sahel, small reservoir expansion started later and continued until more recently, into the 1990s.Mapping the locations of the small reservoirs reveals that they are concentrated mainly on the central plateau of Burkina Faso, matching the areas of higher population density (>25 people per km 2 , CIESIN et al. 2011; see Figure 13 in Appendix A1). A higher density of reservoirs is also evident in the arid, northern Sahel region (Figure 3). Figure 3 differentiates the distribution of small reservoirs over time, according to the decades of intense reservoir building: up to 1979 (green); 1980-1989 (red); and 1990-2001 (blue). Data source: Cecchi (2008) The increase in reservoir development on the central plateau in the 1980s mirrors the promotion of soil and water conservation measures on the plateau, which will be discussed in the following section.Results from the national agricultural surveys show a marked increase from 1993 to 2006 in the proportion of surveyed farmers' fields having at least one SWC measure in place (Figures 4a and 4b; Table 4), particularly in Sahel -the driest region in the study area. It is important to note that often farmers use a combination of measures, which has a greater impact than using one in isolation (Magombeyi et al. 2014;Zougmoré et al. 2003Zougmoré et al. , 2005)). However, this initial study did not disaggregate the data by practice, but instead it categorized fields simply by presence or absence of any SWC intervention. The relatively high 1993 levels of SWC in Nord, Centre-Nord and Plateau-Central reflect the intensive investment in projects focused on that central region since the 1980s, and their continued improvement up to 2006 suggests that the projects and other promotional efforts were successful in increasing SWC adoption. The tripling of SWC presence in Sahel suggests spreading and diffusion of SWC from the central region. Mouhoun and Est, the two regions with large areas in the 800-900 mm rainfall zone, show a lesser increase in the adoption of SWC. The lower proportion of arid and semi-arid areas in these two regions may contribute to explaining the reason for minimal SWC adoption in the locality.Analyzing the adoption rates at the provincial level reveals some interesting trends (Figure 4a and 4b). For example, in the provinces that lie within the 600-700 mm rainfall zone in Mouhoun and Est, the share of cultivated land where SWC practices were used increased to 16-18% and 11-15%, respectively, in 2006 while there was no increase (7%), or even a decline (down to 0%), in the provinces receiving more than 700 mm of rainfall per annum. In general, SWC coverage increases across the 400-800 mm rainfall zones. Provinces in the southern parts of Mouhoun and Est, as well as many other southern provinces, show a decrease in SWC coverage from 1993 to 2006. At the provincial level, the highest rates of SWC coverage in 2006 were 35% and 36% in Bam and Sanmatenga, respectively (both Centre-Nord, see Appendix A3 for provincial statistics).Figure 4a: Proportion of fields using SWC in 1993, as a percentage of total fields sampled and villages where SWC measures have been recorded. An examination of peer-reviewed publications and grey literature for estimates to supplement the national surveys showed few quantitative evaluations of adoption. Most peer-reviewed literature relates to experimental field studies observing the impacts of SWC measures in particular fields. All reported locations of zai or stone bunds having been adopted, from both peer-reviewed and grey literature, are depicted in Figures 4a and 4b (reference details in Appendix A4), highlighting tthat international projects have focussed on the Nord and Centre-Nord regions. Most references to SWC adoption, either in general or specifically zai and stone bunds, are qualitative rather than quantitative and suggest that the technology is \"widespread\" (Batterbury 1996, p15) and that \"every household\" uses it (Sawadogo 2011, p123).Some attempts to quantify the total area treated with SWC measures suggest that zais are used on 30,000-60,000 ha in northwestern Burkina Faso (Sawadogo 2011) and that some measure of SWC is used on more than 200,000 ha of agricultural land in central Burkina Faso (Reij et al. 2009). Local adoption rates of 49-60% have been recorded within the Yateng Province (Barbier et al. 2009). However, quantifying adoption at the regional level, for each region, proved challenging. Often project evaluation reports provide the total area treated, for example with stone bunds, but the publications refer to differing and ill-defined areal extents (e.g., Yatenga versus northwestern Burkina Faso), making it difficult to consistently contextualize the reported coverage, and hence it is challenging to compare statistics across years and publications. Therefore, data on documented area of SWC use was extracted only from publications with precise location references (e.g., Yatenga) for which total areas are available. As summarized in Table 3, the area with documented SWC use roughly relates to the total area of cultivated agricultural land in the relevant region, as reported for the agricultural season closest to the publication year of the reference source. Assuming the documented areas per project are complementary, and not overlapping with figures reported for other projects, the combined quantified proportion of cropland using SWC measures adds up to roughly 150,000 ha and 5-20% of the cropland per region by 2004, compared to 8,000 ha and 4.5% of cropland in 1990. These data refer to only the area where projects implemented SWC measures and do not include future spread (or abandonment) of those SWC measures. The literature results are therefore expected to be an estimated minimum, assuming that the literature has not documented all instances of adoption. These literature results are comparable to the adoption rates derived from the national statistics, although lower, especially for Nord province (Table 4). To summarize the expansion of AWM technologies in the study area, the increase in small reservoirs has been complemented by a similar trend in the adoption of SWC (Figure 5). Data sources: Small reservoirs from Cecchi (2008); SWC from INSD (1994), DGPER (2008). Note: The disconnected point on the reservoir curve represents the total number of small reservoirs recorded including those with no date of construction.CPWF June 2014Field studies and a few village-level case studies have shown that agricultural water management (AWM) technologies can increase yields by more than 100% (Sawadogo 2011;Botoni and Reij 2009); improve soil quality by reducing runoff, sediment loss and nutrient loss (Zougmoré et al. 2010(Zougmoré et al. , 2009)); and possibly improve groundwater levels (Reij et al. 2005). The following section analyzes socioeconomic indicators at the regional level for evidence of AWM impact.Both yield (kg ha -1 ) and crop area planted, viz. with main cereals, have been highly variable over the 25year time series available , but a trend of increase is more or less evident depending on the crop and the region (Figures 6a and 6b, respectively). In general, a normalized time series of the major cereal crops smoothed with a 5-year moving average produce trendlines with a gradient of around 0.03 (3% increase per year) (Table 5). The r 2 values indicate that millet and sorghum yield has had less inter-annual variation than maize and rice, suggesting that this trend is more reliable and that millet and sorghum yields are more stable. Although very erratic, rice yields have increased dramatically since the 1980s, a result of strong increases in both area cultivated and total production. For the rain-fed cereals (i.e., not including rice), Nord and Centre-Nord show high rates of increase most consistently in their trendlines, i.e., 3-4% per year. These are two regions where SWC promotion also has been concentrated.In terms of evaluating the impact of AWM technologies on improving the yield, it is important to know how much of the perceived increase is due to expansion into new cropland. In central Burkina Faso, the potential for expansion is limited due to its historically high population pressure (Barbier et al. 2009;Marchal 1977). In Plateau-Central and Centre-Nord, cropland expansion has not exceeded 150% of cropland in 1984, except for rice (Figure 6b). However, in the other regions, such as Nord and Sahel rainfed crops (millet and sorghum) have expanded dramatically, i.e., 200-350%. In general, Mouhoun, Est and Sahel, being the regions with lower population density and more land availability, have the highest expansion results. The expansion of the area cultivated for rice, although still small in absolute terms, is an order of magnitude higher than the other crops, suggestive of an initial expansion after introduction, particularly in Sahel. It is interesting to note that the area cultivated has inter-annual fluctuations of up to 100,000 hectares or more. In Centre-Nord in particular, the area planted with sorghum has risen and fallen by 60,000-100,000 hectares several times over the 20-year study period. However, it appears that the fluctuation is to some extent due to the alternation of crops, i.e., sorghum with millet, which is more evident in Centre-Nord than in other regions. While absolute yield improvement is necessary, the improvement must keep up with population growth and surpass it in order to realize a noticeable improvement in local food security and possibly in farmingdependant livelihoods. Analysis of total cereal production per capita (Figure 7, Table 6) shows that there has only been a consistent rise in production per person for rain-fed cereals (millet, sorghum and maize) in Nord and Mouhoun. In Sahel and Centre-Nord, the series varies periodically, with a first peak around the early 1990s and a second rise toward 2006 (end of the dataset). Nord, Centre-Nord and Sahel also have the highest AWM adoption rates, along with Plateau-Central. Rice production rises slowly and consistently only in Sahel and Plateau-Central; in Mouhoun and Est, per capita production is more periodic and declines toward the end of the time series. Production has not kept up with population and has even declined in Plateau-Central and Est for rain-fed cereals, and in Nord and Centre-Nord for rice. However, all regions were producing more than the minimum cereal requirement per capita by 2008. In summary, these results suggest that food security will improve in Nord; will be relatively stable in Centre-Nord; will be potentially rising but variable in Sahel and Mouhoun; and will be potentially decreasing in Plateau-Central and Est. Systematically higher per capita production in both Mouhoun and Est reflects their lower population density. Table 6: Trends in major cereal production per capita (kgcapita-1, with 5-year moving average). Millet and sorghum are typically rain-fed crops and therefore more likely to be affected by SWC adoption than by the building of small reservoirs due to direct in-field improvements in soil moisture availability. Comparing millet and sorghum yield with the national survey statistics for SWC shows similar gradients for yield and SWC trendlines (Table 7, Figure 8). All series were smoothed using a 5-year moving average to allow any trends to be seen more clearly and normalized by setting the first data point as 1. Thus, similar gradients imply that the changes in the variable are of a similar magnitude, suggesting a possible relationship that could be further tested when more data is available. With r 2 values mostly greater than 0.5, all regions except Plateau-Central show concurrent increases in yield and SWC over the period of development (though this is not the case for sorghum in Sahel). As highlighted in Table 7, Nord, Centre-Nord and Mouhoun all have very similar gradients of between 1% and 6% increase per year. For the remaining regions, SWC adoption has increased far more (10%-20%) relative to yields (1%-4%). While this simple analysis is not able to differentiate the impacts on yield of SWC versus land expansion, Figure 6b showed that land expansion is least significant for millet, which also has the most consistent improvement in yield and therefore the millet results may be more strongly related to SWC adoption. However, land expansion is an important confounder and should be included in further analyses, particularly in relation to sorghum and in general for Mouhoun, Est and Sahel, which have greater possibility for expansion. Rice benefits more from small reservoirs expansion than SWC adoption, due to the increased irrigation potential. Nonetheless, there are instances of initial experiments using half-moons to cultivate rain-fed rice (Zougmoré, pers. comm.). Small reservoir development was, therefore, compared with normalized, 5-year moving averages of rice yields (Figure 9). As in Figure 8, positive trends of increasing yield can be seen, ranging from around 0.2% per year in Mouhoun to 3% in Plateau-Central and Est and up to 11% in Sahel (Table 8). The most closely comparable rates of increase in reservoirs and rice yields, confirmed by a quick regression, are found in Nord, Centre-Nord and Sahel. Burkina Faso has a total population of just over 15.2 million (INSD 2013a), of which the rural population is 11 million (72%). 80% of the working population is employed in the agricultural sector (MEF 2000).Poverty analyses of the 1994 and 1998 household surveys show regional poverty levels for the study area remaining the same (40-60%), except for Plateau-Central, where poverty increased from 50 to 55% (Table 9), reflecting the influence of Ouagadougou's higher urban poverty. Recalculations for the national level show that poverty, in fact, declined (Grimm and Günther 2007;World Bank 2014) or at least stabilized (Lachaud 2004) over the study period. However, the econometric methodologies used to produce the national poverty statistics are based on household assets and access to services that are mostly relevant to urban areas -electricity, piped water, electrical appliances, concrete, etc. Testing an alternative, i.e., a non-econometric analysis of poverty that is based on food sufficiency and a food poverty line, D'haen (2012) found that in urban areas nation wide, poverty decreased from 2003 to 2007, but rose slightly in 2005 due to higher food prices brought about by very poor harvests across the country. D'haen (2012) shows that incorporating food sufficiency as a central indicator of household well-being reflects poverty levels more comprehensively across rural and urban areas than is the case of econometric analyses. Food security is therefore explored in more depth below in Section 4.3.An additional indicator of rural wealth can be cattle or livestock ownership, representing investment of excess income (Moll 2005;Sidibé 2005). An analysis of ownership of ploughs and livestock for draft power suggest that all regions were much better off in 2007 than in 1993 (Table 9), as there has been a marked increase in agricultural assets, which may be reflecting improved income due to AWM adoption. More data points, particularly between 1993 and 2003, would confirm whether the increase is a result of a consistent linear trend, or whether, for example, 2003 and 2007 are representing considerably higher than average values, due to experiencing an exceptionally good harvest in year 2003 (D'haen 2012).Table 9: Poverty level and AWM expansion over a short period (1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007). Data sources: i) National poverty incidence (%) by region (MEF 2000(MEF for 1994(MEF and 1998;;INSD 2012bINSD for 2003;;MEF 2009MEF for 2006)).ii) An indicator of rural poverty -Proportion (%) of households possessing agricultural equipment (INSD 1994(INSD , 2003(INSD , 2007)).iii) Estimated adoption of SWC measures (National agricultural surveys: INSD 1994; MAHRH and DGPSA 2007) iv) Total number of small reservoirs recorded (Small Reservoirs Database: Cecchi 2008). Note:* There has been discussion over the calculations used to produce these numbers (see Grimm and Günther 2007;Lachaud 2004), saying they should be lower. (1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007), drawn by the author from the data in Table 9.A rigorous analysis of poverty impact resulting from AWM expansion has not been possible with the limited data available, considering also the number of other influences on poverty/wealth, including nonagricultural income sources, improved infrastructure and access to markets, varying demands on income and external shocks. Attributing impact is discussed further in Section 5. However, it is still useful to place the AWM expansion in the context of available indicators of poverty. Rural wealth as indicated by draft ownership has consistently improved alongside AWM expansion (Figure 10) for the period with overlapping data (1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007). However, the relative degree of improvement in wealth compared to AWM expansion varies across the regions. For all regions except Mouhoun, wealth has increased by more than 75% of 1993 values, while the proportional change in SWC ranges from 20 to 70% increase from Note: National poverty incidence data was inverted so that a positive change in national poverty refers to a reduction in poverty incidence (i.e., an improvement).1993 values. Only in Sahel, Plateau-Central and Est do SWC adoption show similar, though lower, rates of change to rural wealth (50-70%). The change in small reservoirs is generally low over the comparison time period (<15%), as most reservoir expansion had already occurred in the 1980s, except for Sahel where 32% more reservoirs were still to be built after 1993. As the comparison time period captures only the tail end of small reservoir expansion (for the current dataset), it is difficult to make comparisons to wealth, because the impact may have occurred before 1993. Although the national statistics for poverty incidence should be viewed with caution, pending more information on the underlying calculations used, the data suggest at least a 25% improvement in all regions except Mouhoun between 1993 and 2003 or 2006. From the small, current dataset, there is no clear correlation between AWM expansion and wealth; longer and more detailed, overlapping time series are required.Monitoring food security (INSD 2012a) shows that the northern provinces are mostly able to meet their food requirements (190 kg of cereals per capita) through domestic production, although it fluctuates dramatically from year to year (Figure 11). Overlying the year-to-year variation, larger fluctuations can be seen as minimum and maximum figures decrease from 1993/4 to about 1997/8. Since 1998/9, the minimum rates of coverage appear to have been increasing. This general upward trend is particularly noticeable in the Nord region, which also appears to have a smaller range of fluctuation than the other regions. Centre-Nord has somewhat less inter-annual fluctuation as well, apart from the period 1997-2000.Potentially, this is a crude indicator that the higher intensity of SWC promotion carried out in Nord and Centre-Nord, compared to other regions, has resulted in a slight buffer against seasonal variations in these regions. It should be noted that until 2001, Plateau-Central included Kadiogo, the district containing the capital, Ouagadougou. Therefore, its food coverage for that time is depressed compared to the period after 2001, when Kadiogo was no longer included in the Plateau-Central region. Similarly, it is clear from the data that Mouhoun is one of the \"granaries\" of Burkina Faso, producing on average 170% of the country's cereal requirements each year. Despite a wealth of research on the potential benefits of various agricultural production technologies for smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa, there is limited data available on the actual adoption rates and extent of use of these technologies. Hence, there is limited knowledge on their actual impact on smallholder livelihoods. In this report, we focus on two key agricultural water management (AWM) technologies that have generated substantial research and development investments over the past 40 years (Douxchamps et al. 2014) in northern and central Burkina Faso, as identified in an initial study made to address the knowledge gap.From the Small Reservoir Database (Cecchi 2008), which holds records of most reservoirs built up until 2001, it is clear that small reservoir development accelerated in the 1980s, with over 60% of the current stock being built in the 1980s in most regions, and progressed into the 1990s in Sahel and Est.The highest density of small reservoirs occurs mainly on the central plateau (the most densely populated region) and in the northeast of the Sahel region (the driest part of the country). The summary of statistics from the database highlights that despite accounting for at least 60%, and up to 90%, of all reservoirs recorded in Burkina Faso, small reservoirs only carry around 3% of the total volume of stored water. This has important implications for potential upscaling and restoration of small reservoirs as some studies suggest small reservoirs have marginal impact on the overall basin water balance (e.g. De Condappa et al. 2008a), but enable significant benefits to livelihoods and human wellbeing (Venot et al. 2012).In terms of the impact of small reservoir expansion on livelihoods, productivity changes in irrigated cereals (rice) for the same available time period (1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001) suggests a strong increase in rice productivity.Reservoir development is suggesting expansion of rice in the region, particularly in Sahel, Plateau-Central and Centre-Nord. This result is to be expected as the reservoirs are often built for the purpose of initiating or servicing rice irrigation schemes. The closest correlations in rice are found in the highly populated Nord and Centre-Nord and in the arid Sahel, which realized a 6-11% per year productivity increase, albeit still producing small overall quantities. A case study of such a rice irrigation scheme (de Fraiture et al. 2014) documents the development of additional small-scale, informal market gardening that is occurring concurrently, which highlights the importance of the reservoirs for supplemental irrigation. Their multiple-use function is especially important for livelihood diversification as a coping strategy in highly populated areas where land availability is limited as well as in dry areas where water is scarce. A detailed multiple regression analysis of the additional benefits of supplemental irrigation in comparison to other crops was not possible in this study. Nevertheless, it is essential for evaluating and establishing the best management strategies to ensure sustained benefits from small reservoirs.Only a brief comparison between small reservoirs and poverty-related indicators (poverty levels, ownership of agricultural assets and food security) was possible in this review, because the overlap in time between the respective datasets was insignificant (less than 10 years and only two data points for poverty). The most significant reservoir development occurred in the 1980s, which is before the time period covered by the poverty indicators (1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007). Hence, any immediate impacts on poverty would not have not been captured. However, in Sahel, the one region which had significant reservoir expansion after 1990 (about 25% between 1993 and 2001), both national statistics and ownership of agricultural capital (draft animals and equipment) suggest similar or greater improvements in wealth from 1993 to 1998. Nonetheless, this comparison is based on only two data points for poverty, i.e., in 1993 and 1998. Currently it is assumed that there will be large potential benefits from the expansion of small reservoirs in improving water accessibility to smallholder farmers, without having any significant impact on the overall water balance (Venot et al. 2012). However, the benefits must be balanced against reservoirs' hydrological (in)efficiency and the negative impacts of mismanagement and siltation (Venot et al. 2012).It is therefore critical to access better time series that allow a more accurate assessment linking small reservoir development to more sustainable livelihoods.The wide-scale dissemination of soil and water conservation (SWC) technologies began on the central plateau in the 1980s. By 2006, SWC practices had successfully expanded, with evidence of adoption rates (the percentage of cultivated land where SWC is in use) of at least 25% in Plateau-Central and Sahel; 28% in Nord; and 38% in Centre-Nord. Outside of this central area, which has been the core of SWC promotion projects for 30 years or more, and within the remaining study area that receives less than 700 mm rainfall per year, adoption rates were a modest 10-20%. These adoption rates are a minimum estimate derived from the use of anti-erosion measures, predominantly stone and earth bunds, zai pits and windbreaks, in fields surveyed for the annual agricultural survey and represent the proportion of cultivated land enhanced with SWC. The increase in the peripheral provinces, though modest (10-15% adoption), is heartening as some doubled their 1993 rates. The Sahel region, in particular, has by far had the largest increase from around 5% up to 25% adoption. Such a large expansion of SWC measures in an arid environment, particularly if used to rehabilitate degraded land (e.g., Reij et al. 2009), would agree with and explain the evidence of \"greening of the Sahel\" that has been analyzed through remote sensing (e.g., Haglund et al. 2011). Therefore, we speculate that the government support and emphasis on promoting SWC to counter erosion, with the help of the large international projects, has been successful beyond the original geographical scope of the projects. There is also clear evidence of a drop in rates of uptake across the 700 mm threshold of annual rainfall. In the southernmost provinces of Mouhoun and Est, which receive 700-900 mm of rainfall per year, adoption has remained minimal (Appendix A3), which is a consequence of SWC being less productive in higher rainfall regimes where the in-situ rainwater harvesting technologies (stone bunds, zai) retain too much water and cause waterlogging (IEG 2011; Barbier et al. 2009;Roose et al. 1999). Crops may be lost from flooding in more seasons than they benefit from the rainwater harvesting. However, vegetative barriers, as opposed to mineral barriers, are suggested as a means of benefitting from SWC in higher rainfall regimes as they are porous and will use excess water, although they can still cause waterlogging (Spaan 2003;Zougmoré et al. 2009). Vegetative barriers were excluded from this study as competing for water in semi-arid and arid regions, but warrant further study.Comparing SWC adoption to yield changes, poverty and food security proved somewhat more relevant than for small reservoirs, as the time series overlap well (1980s-2006). Unfortunately, the concrete data on SWC adoption is limited to two data points (1993 and 2006), which limits the potential of the analyses.Obtaining access to more data points to fill out the SWC time series is key to confirming the initial findings made in this study. Regional yields of major rain-fed cereals have improved over the period 1984-2008, indicating a 1-4% increase per year for normalized 5-year moving averages. Millet presents the most coherent improvements, almost doubling in yield across the study area, as does sorghum in Nord, Centre-Nord and Sahel where SWC has been most widely adopted. Furthermore, yield per capita has increased consistently in Nord. Comparing the magnitude and timing of increases in millet and sorghum yields with SWC adoption suggests closely comparable rates of increase in Nord, Centre-Nord and Mouhoun, which supports the hypothesis that the introduction, adoption and uptake of SWC is successful in improving yields and ultimately livelihoods. Although still increasing together in Sahel and Plateau-Central, the expansion of SWC adoption has far outstripped yields, growing 10% -12% per year compared to yields (1%-4%). Firstly, yields in these two regions are more variable than in the rest of the study area, which depresses the average rate of increase. Furthermore, these two regions are the most constrained for land (Plateau-Central) and water (Sahel), and thus lower yields could be expected. Further data, to extend the time series as well as to fill in gaps, will be important for producing a detailed multiple regression analysis that illuminates how SWC adoption interacts with yield, together with other constraining and enabling factors.The available measurements of regional poverty levels, ownership of agricultural equipment and food security suggest overall improvements over the past 20 years. However, greater detail in the time series is still required to assess how significant these improvements have been and whether a strong relation can be determined in relation to the normalized yield and outscaling of AWM technologies such as small reservoirs and SWC. Although the SWC statistics do overlap with the poverty statistics, both datasets are only represented by a few data points (1993, 2003, 2005/6), presenting snapshots rather than trends. For example, both 2003 and 2007 yielded very good harvests, whereas in 2005 late rains led to very poor harvests nation wide and low food sufficiency (D'haen 2012, p69), a fact reflected in the worsening of poverty indicators. Greater detail in both time series would allow an assessment to be made as to whether areas with higher SWC adoption were buffered against the crisis in 2005 or not. However, the limited data available suggests that a positive linkage exists. This indicates that, while AWM adoption is intuitively important to poverty reduction, the link between improved yields and reduced poverty levels is very complex and indirect. Hence, more data and analysis is required to shed light on the interaction at the regional level. The benefits of AWM have been proven in field trials. However, more data is required to conclusively link widespread regional AWM adoption to improved regional yield.Outside the core area of Nord and Centre-Nord, Sahel, in particular, has higher and more consistent yield improvements in rain-fed cereals and rice compared to the other regions. This may be an indirect benefit of both small reservoirs and SWC measures retaining water in a landscape with highly temporal variation of rainfall and thereby contributing to groundwater storage. However, this is an issue for more detailed, future research.This study provides a starting point for exploring the link between improving agriculture (AWM adoption) and achieving widespread impact on livelihoods, in the form of regionally improved food security and poverty reduction, via increased yields. However, the study has only analyzed the startand end points in the outcome-impact pathway (Figure 12). It has also only covered a limited number of aspects of the pathway. Douxchamps et al. (2014) explain how achieving sustainable impact from AWM uptake and outscaling is contingent on the successful achievement several other components, beyond simply introducing the AWM technology. Complementary \"levers of change\" by a range of actors include reinforcing the knowledge base, providing institutional support and using best practices in implementation approach -all set within a conceptual understanding of landscape approaches, with active communication and integration between actors. Furthermore, AWM adoption is one strategy among many factors contributing to enhancing yield, food security and income. For example, rainfall variability is an overriding determinant of actual productivity, with short-term and long-term periodicity clearly evident in the yield data. Moreover, adopting AWM interventions is only one of several options for changing the management of the cropping system to achieve better yields; others include adding fertilizers, managing pest and weeds, using hybrid varieties of seeds and implementing best and most timely mix of crop management strategies. Examples of the drivers of AWM adoption from the other components beyond the technology itself (its effectiveness for improving yield) include the significant external investments, in the order of USD 641 million, which have been allocated over the period 1970 to 2009 toward agricultural water management projects, including SWC, in conjunction with long-term, government-driven programmes (Sidibé 2005;Douxchamps et al. 2014). Similar support may be driving fertilizer distribution or microcredit promotion in particular regions, which needs to be investigated in association to AWM adoption to scale. Are the multiple system interventions enabling yield impact to scale? Or can AWM adoption as a single intervention alone be the contributor to the yield gains? Similarly, as in Botoni and Reij (2009) and Douxchamps et al. (2014), nonfarm income (e.g., remittances), population dynamics, national politics and infrastructure development, including changes in access to markets and information, are all part of the other necessary components for sustainable impact. Roads accessible during all seasons are critical for providing access to markets and their absence therefore hinders the sale of excess production and access to inputs to improve production (e.g., Fan et al. 2004).Full exploration of the contribution to specific development goals by AWM adoption at a societal scale would require multiple regressions analyses with a more substantive datasets. This was out of the scope of this study due to the lack of consistent data on development as well as on AWM adoption across regions. Such an analysis is a critical next step in gaining a better understanding of how to achieve sustainable impact on livelihoods from agricultural development and investments. The purpose of this study is to synthesize evidence on adoption of AWM interventions and the contribution to development goals such as yield increase, food security and poverty alleviation. It aims to develop proof of the often assumed causalities between AWM development and yield improvements to scale, to complement the case study literature (e.g., Sawadogo 2011;Reij et al. 2005) that shows, at the field-scale, how successful AWM technologies can be at farmer and community scale. The study set out to provide a sub-national overview of AWM adoption and its impact on yield and poverty in Burkina Faso.The preliminary study has shown that• Soil and water conservation (SWC) technologies have expanded substantially in the study area of north central Burkina Faso between 1980 and 2005 in provinces receiving 700 mm mean annual rainfall or less, with evidence of adoption rates of at least 25-40% coverage of cultivated area in Centre-Nord, Nord, Plateau-Central and Sahel, and a minimum of 10-20% in the rest of the study area• There has been a gradual increase in regional yields of around 3% per year from the 1980s to 2008, leading to a 150%-200% increase in absolute yields over 30 years until 2010• Rates of increase between rain-fed cereal yields and SWC adoption in Nord and Centre-Nord are particularly aligned, and there is a close correlation between rice productivity and small reservoir expansion in Nord, Centre-Nord and Sahel• Poverty and food security indicators suggest improvements in the well-being of farmers since the 1990s with an average 25% reduction in poverty incidence across the study area and an estimated 4% per year increase in food security in Nord and Plateau Central• To attribute AWM adoption to the outcomes in development is likely an oversimplification. AWM adoption should be further analyzed, taking at least rainfall patterns, crop/seed use and fertilizer management into account over the same time, controlling for co-benefits in yieldsAchieving impact on food security and poverty alleviation via AWM uptake and outscaling is a product of multiple inter-dependent components (technology, knowledge, approaches, institutions, concepts) and just one of many strategies to achieving livelihood improvement. More data and long-term analysis is needed to illuminate the AWM impact pathway at provincial and regional scale to clarify levers of change and \"best bet\" investments in rural development. Further analysis of the regional yield trends and more detailed time series for household wealth and food security indicators is needed to further explore the causal evidence of AWM development and rural food security gains or poverty alleviation effects at a subnational scale. This review, therefore, provides a starting point for future work."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0870040466.json b/main/part_2/0870040466.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6e4b910573fc092f6715952d853169180c74248 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0870040466.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d4ac9dedb127738957cd56cdb5e0e341","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1f4a75da-95c1-42d7-b4fb-d918ab39b70e/retrieve","id":"611850588"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"31ec4fdd-0b6d-4b6b-a5fc-e76092005290","content":"En Nicaragua el café ocupa el tercer lugar de la superficie cultivada (11%) y, después del maíz y del frijol, es el rubro agrícola que más contribuye al PIB (10%). El 96% de las fincas cafetaleras están en manos de pequeños productores (menos de 20 manzanas 1 ), los cuales representan un 50% del área cultivada del café. Alrededor del 95% del café en Nicaragua se produce bajo sombra y utiliza diversas variedades como Caturra, Borbón, Maragogipe, Catimor, Típica y Cautilla. El café es una fuente muy importante de empleo en el sector rural. Se estima que esta actividad genera un 53% del empleo agrícola y el 14% del total de todo el país. Alrededor del 85% de la producción total de café se vende en el mercado externo y un 15% se consume localmente. Una gran parte de la exportación se realiza a través de intermediarios: solo un 46% de la producción exportable viene directamente del pequeño productor. Existen grandes inequidades dentro del sector del café en Nicaragua, donde grandes empresas concentran gran parte de los ingresos. Nicaragua cuenta con 44.000 productores que cultivan café como rubro principal como parte de un sistema integrado. Esto quiere decir que además de café, cultivan maíz, frijol, hortalizas y musáceas, cítricos, y raíces como la malanga. De ellos, unos 30.000 son pequeños productores que cultivan áreas de entre tan solo 0.5 y 5 manzanas y a los que les resulta muy difícil acceder al financiamiento, tecnologías y apoyo técnico necesarios para modernizar su producción. Los productores medianos y grandes, por otro lado, tienen acceso o al menos cuentan con los recursos suficientes para poder pagar los servicios que les facilitan mejorar su producción.1 Una manzana son 0.7 hectáreas.Fotografía: Balli, Guatemala. Biodiversity International.Además de la alta volatilidad de los precios del café a nivel internacional, el cambio climático contribuye a la vulnerabilidad de los caficultores de Nicaragua. Modelos climáticos desarrollados por el Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) en los últimos años estiman que la temperatura media anual en Mesoamérica subirá de 2 a 2.5ºC, siendo Nicaragua uno de los países que probablemente experimentará un incremento más importantes junto con Honduras y México (Läderach et al., 2011). Los modelos predicen también reducciones de precipitación anual en la mayor parte de Mesoamérica, siendo Honduras y Nicaragua los países que sufrirán los cambios más dramáticos, con disminuciones de la pluviosidad entre un 5% y 10%. Se espera además que el sector agrícola nicaragüense se vea afectado por posibles pérdidas de suelo en las zonas de ladera provocadas por fenómenos climáticos extremos, pérdida de nichos climáticos y de adaptabilidad de los cultivos y variaciones en la presencia de plagas y enfermedades.Con respecto al cultivo del café, concretamente, se espera que debido a las nuevas condiciones climáticas, algunas áreas dejen de ser aptas para el café (en los municipios de San Ramón, Tuma La Dalia, Matagalpa). Otros municipios como Jinotega, Nueva Segovia y Madriz, seguirán siendo aptas para el cultivo de café, pero su producción probablemente implicará la adopción de nuevas prácticas agronómicas. Por otro lado, un incremento en la variabilidad de las lluvias podría tener un impacto significativo sobre el rubro, cuyo ciclo de producción es muy dependiente de los patrones de lluvia. Adicionalmente, una mayor variabilidad interanual de las condiciones climáticas, incluyendo un aumento en la frecuencia o la duración de los eventos del Niño, podrían dar lugar a mayores fluctuaciones en cantidad y calidad de la cosecha de café así como la aparición de nuevas plagas y enfermedades de comportamiento cíclico que se presentan en el cultivo, lo que podría afectar la capacidad de los agricultores y de las cooperativas de participar y cumplir los contratos de venta a largo plazo. La esperada consecuente alteración del crecimiento de los frutos y de los ciclos de floración y maduración podrían resultar asimismo en menos granos, más pequeños y de menor calidad, lo que supondría menos ingresos en las familias, con un consecuente incremento de los costos de producción de la cosecha.Una de las soluciones que se avistan como más promisorias para hacer frente al cambio climático es la de adaptar las practicas agronómicas y cultivos a las nuevas condiciones para poder seguir cultivando en las zonas que a pesar de los cambios esperados seguirán siendo aptas para el cultivo del café. Tanto a nivel local como nacional, existe un amplio espectro de herramientas que pueden ser utilizadas para promover e incentivar la adopción de este tipo de medidas. Ejemplos de ellas son el desarrollo y la adopción de nuevas variedades de café, el cultivo de otras especies agrícolas, control de la erosión y el fuego, opciones de producción orgánicas y la mejora del manejo de tejidos y de la sombra.Limitantes como tecnificación escasa, la amplia dispersión de los caficultores en el territorio y la débil organización de los mismos, los altos y generalizados niveles de pobreza, la ausencia de garantías prendarias por poseer áreas mínimas de producción, y la ausencia de préstamos a bajo interés aumentan la vulnerabilidad de las familias productoras de café, especialmente en el caso de los pequeños caficultores dada su escasa capacidad de inversión en sus unidades productivas. No obstante, durante los últimos años, los pequeños productores se han organizado en cooperativas de servicios a través de las cuales tienen acceso a una red de entidades financieras no convencionales y a proyectos sociales que permiten al pequeño agricultor obtener créditos y garantías hipotecarias que pueden equipararse a las que ofrecen los bancos. En el momento de realizar este estudio, existían en Nicaragua unas 54 organizaciones trabajando con 240 grupos de productores de café. Los pequeños productores no organizados normalmente venden su cosecha a intermediarios informales, mientras que muchos de los pequeños productores organizados enNoviembre, 2016 cooperativas tienen vinculación directa con mercados de nicho y con importadores y tostadores en los principales mercados de Estados Unidos y Europa.En este contexto, y en el marco de un proyecto denominado \"Planes de Inversión en Agricultura Sostenible Adaptada al Clima\" implementado por CEDECO, HIVOS, Bioversity Internacional, el Centro Mundial de Agroforestería (ICRAF) y la Universidad de Vermont, Bioversity International llevó a cabo un estudio sobre el marco político e institucional que rodea la producción del café por pequeños productores en Nicaragua. Los objetivos del mismo fueron entender y documentar cómo las políticas públicas que regulan la caficultura en Nicaragua así como el modo de funcionar de las cooperativas agrícolas influyen en las prácticas agrícolas de los pequeños productores de café en Nicaragua, y en particular su capacidad para adoptar medidas que les permitan adaptar la producción cafetalera a los efectos del cambio climático. Este estudio se basó en una revisión bibliográfica inicial suplementada y contrastada con investigación original realizada a través de encuestas a expertos involucrados en la producción del café en Nicaragua. El estudio se complementa además con un mapeo de los actores involucrados en las cadenas de café en Nicaragua desarrollado por HIVOS bajo el mismo proyecto. El presente documento presenta los resultados principales del estudio y propone una serie de medidas que podrían mejorar el apoyo de las políticas y organizaciones públicas, así como de las cooperativas agrícolas, al pequeño productor de café en Nicaragua. Las Leyes que rigen la caficultura en Nicaragua son principalmente la Ley No. 368 del café y la Ley No. 853 para la transformación y desarrollo de la caficultura. Aparte de estas leyes, existen otras más genéricas como las de comercio u otras que tienen incidencia en el sector agropecuario y que, sin ser específicas, también afectan al sector. Otra ley relevante es la Ley No. 499 de las cooperativas, que otorga y regula la facultad de los productores a reunirse si así lo desean. El cuadro 1 muestra una lista de las principales leyes que influyen de algún modo la caficultura nicaragüense.La Ley del café constituyó el Consejo Nacional del Café (CONACAFE) como única entidad gubernamental dedicada a la caficultura en Nicaragua. El cuadro 2 presenta los actores principales en la cadena productiva del café nicaragüense. Según lo establecido por la Ley del café, CONACAFE debería financiarse exclusivamente a partir de la adquisición de 0,50 centavos de dólar por quintal de café exportado. Esta cantidad debía ser recaudada por los exportadores del café, responsables a su vez de ingresarlos en el banco encargado del fideicomiso para las actividades de CONACAFE. Sin embargo, desde que dicha ley entró en revisión en 2013, es el gobierno quien da apoyo financiero directamente a la institución. Recientemente, CONACAFE promovió la creación del Programa Nacional para la Transformación y Desarrollo de la Caficultura, aprobada mediante la Ley No. 853 \"Ley para la Transformación y Desarrollo de la Caficultura\", aprobada en Diciembre de 2013. Con el fin de implementar dicha ley, el gobierno instaló oficialmente el 31 de julio de 2014 en el Banco Central de Nicaragua la Comisión Nacional de Transformación y Desarrollo de la Caficultura (CONATRADEC). Esta comisión está conformada por ocho miembros del sector privado, cooperativas y asociaciones, más los integrantes del Sistema Nacional de Producción, Consumo y Comercio, y representantes de la banca. Entre sus funciones destacan el desarrollo de planes de acción para modernizar la caficultura, atender diversas demandas del sector como prevenir y subsanar los efectos de la roya y otras plagas del café, y disponer de financiamiento y apoyo técnico para los productores.Fotografía: Samarkanda, Nicaragua. Biodiversity International.Noviembre, 2016 Política de Seguridad y Soberanía Alimentaria y Nutricional desde el Sector Público Agropecuario y Rural. Publicada en 2009 por el Ministerio Agropecuario y Forestal (MAGFOR), promueve la producción y el consumo de granos básicos (maíz, fríjol, sorgo) por pequeños y medianos productores a través de medidas relacionadas con la tenencia de la tierra, acceso a nuevos mercados, acceso a crédito, infraestructura para el comercio agropecuario, oferta a insumos y estabilidad de precios. Ley No. 717: Ley Creadora del Fondo para Compra de Tierras con Equidad de Género para Mujeres Rurales. Aprobada en 2010, establece la creación de un fondo para otorgar créditos a mujeres con el fin de mejorar la calidad de vida del núcleo familiar, el acceso a los recursos financieros, priorizando a aquellas mujeres cabezas de familia, de bajos recursos económicos. Ley No. 368: Ley del Café. Aprobada en el año 2000 con el objetivo de fomentar y desarrollar el sector cafetalero a través de una serie de ventajas fiscales. La ley establece además la creación del Consejo Nacional del Café (CONACAFE). Estrategia para la Reconversión y Diversificación Competitiva de la Caficultura Nicaragüense y Seguridad Alimentaria. Diseñada en 2004 por el MAGFOR y el CONACAFE con el fin de movilizar fondos públicos y privados para desarrollar distintas actividades y reactivar la producción de café. Programa Nacional de Transformación y Desarrollo de la Caficultura. Presentado por MAGFOR en Junio de 2012 con la finalidad de apoyar a los pequeños y medianos productores que han experimentado daños por la roya a través de la ampliación de la oferta y facilitación del acceso al crédito y asistencia técnica para las actividades fundamentales del proceso productivo del café. Noviembre, 2016En el momento de realizar este estudio, la CONATRADEC acababa de ponerse en marcha: el consejo había sido estructurado, las prioridades se habían establecido y se le había dado coherencia al Programa Nacional para la Transformación y Desarrollo de la Caficultura, el cual tiene como principal objetivo \"la transformación y desarrollo de la caficultura que conduzca a una mayor producción, productividad e ingresos de manera sostenible en armonía con el medio ambiente, con el concurso de todos los agentes que participan en la actividad de la caficultura para contribuir a mejorar el nivel de vida de sus familias, así como el ordenamiento de todas las actividades de producción, beneficiado, procesamiento, industrialización y comercialización del café producido en el territorio nacional\" (Ley 853, Gaceta oficial Nicaragua 2013). A grandes rasgos, lo que el programa prevé es el establecimiento de un mecanismo de creación y administración de un fondo para financiar el programa. El fondo será constituido con los aportes en dólares que se obtengan por cada quintal exportado de café durante cada año calendario, con un mínimo de 1 dólar cuando el precio sea menor o igual a U$140, y hasta un máximo de U$4 cuando el precio del café supere los U$185. En un principio, los primeros productores en ser atendidos por el programa serán los pequeños, aunque se espera que progresivamente los medianos y grandes productores se beneficien igualmente del mismo. La CONATRADEC prevé, con el tiempo, incrementar la asistencia técnica en el territorio, desarrollando las capacidades de los técnicos, promoviendo la alfabetización entre los agricultores y el establecimiento de un laboratorio disponible para todos los caficultores y cuyo uso siga contribuyendo al fondo.Noviembre, 2016Cuadro 2. Actores principales en la cadena productiva del café en Nicaragua* Ministerio Agropecuario y Forestal (MAGFOR). Rector de las políticas públicas agropecuarias y forestales. Implementa el Programa Nacional de Transformación y Desarrollo de la Caficultura entre los pequeños agricultores y los aspectos de este programa relacionados con el cambio climático. Ministerio de Economía Familiar Comunitaria, Cooperativa y Asociativa (MEFCCA). Está a cargo de definir e implementar las políticas públicas orientadas al desarrollo de la \"de agricultura climáticamente inteligente\" (CSA por sus siglas en inglés) a nivel nacional. -Programa NICADAPTA financiado por FIDA implementa actividades relacionadas a la adaptación al cambio Climático en el sector café y cacao. Ministerio de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (MARENA). Sus competencias incluyen la reforestación y la protección de recursos naturales en paisajes cafetaleros a nivel nacional. Ministerio de Fomento, Industria y Comercio (MIFIC). Elabora e implementa políticas públicas para el fomento industrial agropecuario (promueve el valor agregado en el café). Centro de Trámite de las Exportaciones (CETREX). Facilita el proceso de exportación del café. Comisión Nacional del Café (CONACAFE). Coordina los esfuerzos de todos los actores del sector cafetalero para el cumplimiento de la Ley No. 368 del Café.Establecida en seguimiento a la Ley de Transformación y Desarrollo de la Caficultura para la implementación de la Ley y los programas desarrollados bajo esta ley. Organismo Internacional Regional de Sanidad Agropecuaria (OIRSA). Apoya los esfuerzos de los Estados miembros, para lograr el desarrollo de sus planes de salud animal y sanidad vegetal y el fortalecimiento de sus sistemas cuarentenarios.. Actualmente coordina el programa regional de apoyo al control de la roya del cafeto. Consejo Agropecuario Centroamericano. Es un organismo del Sistema de Integración Centroamericana (SICA) encargado de proponer y ejecutar acciones, programas y proyectos regionales en el campo agropecuario, forestal y pesquero, tanto en materia de políticas de sanidad vegetal y animal como aspectos relativos a la investigación científica y la modernización productiva. Comité Regional de Recursos Hidráulicos del Istmo Centroamericano-Es un organismo técnico intergubernamental del Sistema de la Integración Centroamericana (SICA), especializado en los campos de la meteorología y el clima, la hidrología y los recursos hídricos e hidráulicos. Su objetivo principal es promover el desarrollo y la conservación de los recursos derivados del clima, principalmente los hídricos y su utilización sostenible, incluido en la producción del café. Instituto Nicaragüense de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Genera y promueve soluciones científicas y tecnológicas para la caficultura nicaragüense.Noviembre, 2016 Fundación para el Desarrollo Tecnológico, Agropecuario y Forestal de Nicaragua (FUNICA).Promueve servicios tecnológicos que mejoran la competitividad de la cadena del café -entre otrasy la seguridad alimentaria mediante la investigación articulada con las universidades públicas, empresas privadas y organizaciones de productores/as. Brinda asistencia técnica y capacitación y promueve el mercado de tecnologías. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE). Instituto de investigación de cobertura regional que genera y transfiere conocimientos en el área de la agroecología y adaptación al cambio climático. Asociación de Cafés Especiales de Nicaragua (ACEN). Fomenta la producción de café de alta calidad y el desarrollo del mercado de café especial. Asociación de Exportadores de Café de Nicaragua (EXCAN). Gremio representativo a nivel nacional y miembro del Consejo Superior de la Empresa Privada (COSEP). Defiende los intereses del sector ante impuestos, trámites de exportación, exceso de burocracia, etc. establecido por el gobierno. Asociación de Productores y Exportadores de Nicaragua (APEN). Fortalece la cadena de valor del café y lo posiciona de una mejor manera en el mercado internacional. Asociación de Cooperativas de Pequeños Productores de Café de Nicaragua (CAFENICA). Organización representativa de los productores y productoras a nivel nacional  Central de Cooperativas de Servicios Múltiples (PRODECOOP). Central que aglutina cooperativas de base de productores/as de café convencional y orgánico. Central de Cooperativas Cafetaleras del Norte (CECOCAFEN)-Cooperativa de segundo piso que representa a cooperativas de caficultores/as de café orgánico y tradicional. Unión de Cooperativas Agropecuarias de Jinotega (SOPPEXCCA). Central que aglutina cooperativas de productores/as de café orgánico y convencional.Noviembre, 2016Son numerosos los esfuerzos e iniciativas realizados desde las distintas instituciones descritas anteriormente para fomentar el desarrollo y mejora del sector café en Nicaragua. Sin embargo, el impacto que éstos han tenido a nivel del pequeño caficultor ha sido limitado debido a deficiencias en la implementación de las distintas políticas y leyes y de los pocos recursos con los que cuentan los organismos públicos para hacerse más presentes en el campo. Diferentes ejemplos ilustran estas deficiencias: Hay una percepción general de que la ley del café nunca se ha llegado a implementar; asimismo, el fondo para la compra de tierras por mujeres establecido por la Ley No. 717 nunca llegó a aplicarse (La Prensa, 2016) y el Plan de Adaptación a la Variabilidad y el Cambio Climático, desarrollado por el Gobierno en 2013 con apoyo de varias organizaciones de investigación y otras ONGs y el cual ha recibido muchos elogios a nivel internacional, todavía no se ha traducido en medidas concretas (La Prensa, 2016). En los últimos años se ha incrementado la preocupación de que la CONATRADEC, que se ha configurado como un programa promisorio para la caficultura nicaragüense, no tenga los medios económicos y técnicos necesarios para llegar de modo efectivo a todas las familias cafetaleras.Los aspectos anteriormente descritos afectan directamente la participación de organizaciones de investigación y desarrollo de Nicaragua en iniciativas a nivel regional e internacional que requieren la participación de agencias gubernamentales para su implementación. Sin embargo, también existen oportunidades sobre las que el sector cafetalero nicaragüense podría apoyarse para su mejora y desarrollo: Precios preferenciales pagados por la calidad del café producido en Nicaragua; Clima propicio para el desarrollo del cultivo; Fuerte arraigo de la cultura cafetalera en Nicaragua; Ganancias ambientales asociadas al manejo del cultivo; Apoyo de entidades internacionales como el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, el Fondo Internacional de Desarrollo Agrícola (FIDA), o el Banco Centroamericano de Integración Económica (BCIE) que están interesadas en el desarrollo de una caficultura competitiva y sostenible; Gestión gubernamental en colaboración con ONGs para la implementación de programas y proyectos regionales como el Programa Centroamericano de Gestión Integral de la Roya del Café (PROCAGICA) y el Programa Cooperativo Regional para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y Modernización de la Caficultura (PROMECAFE); Asistencia técnica a pequeños productores a través de la red de técnicos del Instituto Nicaragüense de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), mediante el modelo de Fincas de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica; Existencia de canales de comercialización consolidados que facilitan la comercialización; Existencia de gremios de productores organizados con capacidad de gestión y de formulación de estrategias y políticas; Existencia en el país de centros de investigación y universidades orientadas al sector cafetalero.Noviembre, 2016A pesar de que algunas de las iniciativas públicas aquí presentadas están lejos de una implementación efectiva, su mera existencia demuestra un interés de garantizar apoyo público al sector del café.Ante la complejidad del contexto institucional referente a la caficultura en Nicaragua, el rol de las cooperativas se hace fundamental para el pequeño agricultor. Una cooperativa es, según la Ley No. 499 o Ley general de cooperativas, \"una asociación autónoma de personas que se unen voluntariamente para hacer frente a sus necesidades y aspiraciones económicas, sociales y culturales comunes por medio de una empresa de propiedad conjunta y democráticamente controlada\". El Instituto Nicaragüense de Fomento Cooperativo (INFOCOOP) tiene la autoridad y la responsabilidad de aplicar esta ley y su reglamento.El cooperativismo cafetero en Nicaragua ha sido objeto de estudio por numerosos autores (por ejemplo Mendoza et al., 2012). Los comienzos del mismo se sitúan en la década de los 80 con la reforma agraria y la constitución de las cooperativas de base. En la década de 1990, las cooperativas se encontraron con crecientes dificultades para acceder al crédito, asistencia técnica y a los mercados como consecuencia de las incipientes políticas de liberalización del mercado, las cuales se tradujeron en una creciente privatización y una retirada de las intervenciones estatales. Con el fin de hacer frente a los nuevos retos, las cooperativas de base se fueron uniendo en organizaciones de segundo nivel (cooperativas de cooperativas), pasando así desarrollar servicios de exportación y procesamiento del café dirigido a mercados diferenciados. Cuando las cooperativas se reconocieron como entidades jurídicas en la Constitución y en la Ley nacional de cooperativas los pequeños productores comenzaron a ver en las cooperativas la oportunidad para acceder a la tierra, asistencia técnica, financiamiento, procesamiento del café y mercados, todo lo cual era muy difícil de lograr de manera individual. Progresivamente, las organizaciones de segundo nivel fueron articulándose en organizaciones de tercer nivel.Las cooperativas podrán ser: de consumo, de ahorro y crédito, agrícolas, de producción y de trabajo, de vivienda, pesquera, de servicio público, culturales, escolares, juveniles y otras de interés de la población, sin que esta enumeración se considere limitada.Son las que se constituyen para los fines siguientes: a) Explotación de las tierras pertenecientes a los asociados. b) Adquisición de abonos, plantas, semillas, maquinaria agrícola y demás elementos de la producción primaria y fomento agrícola o pecuario. c) Ventas, exportación, conservación, elaboración, transporte o mejoras de productos.En la década de los 2000 se creó CAFENICA como cooperativa de tercer nivel. Al momento de desarrollar este estudio, CAFENICA estaba integrada por 11 cooperativas que en conjunto aglutinaban alrededor de 10,337 pequeños caficultores (24% de los pequeños productores de café de Nicaragua) y un considerable porcentaje de la producción y exportación del café de Nicaragua. Todas sus cooperativas son certificadas \"Comercio Justo\". Asimismo, una gran parte del café orgánico certificado en Nicaragua está concentrado en las organizaciones asociadas a CAFENICA. El cuadro 3 presenta el ejemplo de una de las cooperativas de segundo grado integradas en CAFENICA y de los servicios que ofrece a las cooperativas de base que forman parte de ella.Noviembre, 2016Cuadro 4. PRODECOOP: Ejemplo de cooperativa de segundo grado La Central de Cooperativas de Servicios Múltiples tiene como misión contribuir a mejorar la calidad de vida de las familias de pequeños/as productores y productoras asociados/as a sus cooperativas de base, y de las comunidades en Las Segovias. El apoyo de PRODECOOP ser articula en torno a los siguientes elementos: Servicios de calidad en toda la cadena de valor del café, miel de abejas y otros productos orgánicos y no orgánicos, con énfasis en la producción, transformación y comercialización. Principios y valores cooperativos, de comercio justo, equidad de género y generacional, adaptación al cambio climático y seguridad y soberanía alimentaria, con estructura eficiente de dirección democrática; y gerencia comprometida con el desarrollo. Y el compromiso, capacidad y experiencia de sus colaboradores en gestión de recursos financieros, técnicos, materiales, y la capacidad de incidencia política; en favor del desarrollo organizacional de sus cooperativas de base.Algunos datos de interés:  PRODECCOP es una cooperativa de segundo grado: central de cooperativas integrada por 38 cooperativas de primer grado. Estas cooperativas de base están constituidas por entre 20 hasta más de 300 productores, dando lugar en conjunto a más de 2300 productores de café de los cuales alrededor del 30% son mujeres y 1096 productores de café orgánico. PRODECOOP es una organización cooperativa certificada, el 100% de los socios trabajan con el Comercio Justo. En promedio exporta 60,000 sacos de café, de los cuales el 50% del volumen total es orgánico. Los productores y productoras se ubican en diferentes comunidades y zonas cafetaleras de los departamentos de Estelí, Madriz y Nueva Segovia, al norte de Nicaragua. PRODECOOP integra además a otros productores de granos básicos, siendo sin embargo, condición fundamental que produzcan también café entre sus cultivos. Cada una de las cooperativas miembras tiene su propia junta directiva, junta de vigilancia, etc. así como sus propias reuniones mensuales y se van financiando con la venta de café. Brindan servicios tales como comercialización, desarrollo cooperativo que incluye asistencia técnica, capacitaciones, crédito, fortalecimiento institucional de las cooperativas, mejoramiento de la calidad del café y proyectos sociales. PRODECOOP ha establecido además un fondo para la compra de tierras para esposas e hijas de los socios, \"Fondo de emergencia\" que fue aprobado en 2012 a partir de la crisis de la roya, \"crédito para la compra de tierra solo para mujeres\" que tiene como principal objetivo incentivar que estas se independicen, créditos para el beneficiado húmedo, para apicultura, para combatir hongos (control de plagas: broca), para el establecimiento de silos metálicos. Los créditos otorgados por PRODECOOP están principalmente destinados a los socios de las cooperativas de base, rara vez a las propias cooperativas. Los requisitos para que un agricultor pueda ser beneficiarios del crédito es que 1) esté certificado como socio, 2) produzca café y 3) que tenga capacidad de pago.Noviembre, 2016La unión de las cooperativas en organizaciones más complejas ha permitido que éstas hayan adquirido progresivamente capacidad y competencia para abordar temas de género, capacidad institucional, asociación y gestión empresarial. Asimismo, ha permitido la inversión en beneficios húmedos, investigación tecnológica, incidencia en políticas públicas y creación de mejores canales de comercialización. Cabe destacar los esfuerzos que desde las cooperativas se están haciendo hacia la inclusión de mujeres y jóvenes en las mismas (mediante, por ejemplo, el apoyo a la participación de la mujer en proyectos, acceso a créditos, participación en órganos dentro de sus cooperativas y que estas tengan un comité de género).Las cooperativas también han trabajado mucho hacia la diversificación de productos y actividades económicas en el mundo rural y en el establecimiento de alianzas con empresas privadas. Las cooperativas han jugado un papel fundamental a la hora de conectar al pequeño productor con agencias de cooperación y organizaciones internacionales interesadas en el desarrollo del sector.En la última década algunas cooperativas vienen haciendo esfuerzos para combatir el cambio climático. Actualmente muchas cooperativas ponien mucho énfasis en promover la mejora de las prácticas de manejo del café mediante la promoción de sistemas agroforestales y el buen manejo de la sombra. Se han desarrollado talleres sobre el uso responsable de agroquímicos y del agua y sobre el tratamiento de las aguas mieles. PRODECOOP, por ejemplo, promueve entre sus miembros la diversificación productiva mediante el apoyo a los agricultores en la producción y comercialización de miel. Coordina también varias iniciativas que buscan garantizar la seguridad alimentaria de los caficultores mediante el cultivo de huertos de patio y otras que apoyan la realización de obras para reciclar el agua.En particular, desde CAFENICA se está tratando de trabajar además en la sensibilización de los caficultores sobre el concepto de \"cambio climático\", todavía muy abstracto para muchos de los pequeños caficultores. En este sentido, con fondos de donantes internacionales, CAFENICA ha establecido estaciones meteorológicas automatizadas con el fin de poder relacionar las condiciones meteorológicas con la productividad de los cultivos de café, contribuyendo así al conocimiento de los impactos reales del cambio climático y a la definición de estrategias para amortiguar los efectos del clima en el rubro. Además, se ha hecho entrega a los caficultores de teléfonos móviles para que ellos mismos documenten y envíen a diario a CAFENICA datos sobre las condiciones meteorológicas, con el fin de formar otra base de datos adicional.Las principales dificultades a las que se enfrentan las cooperativas son la escasez de recursos financieros y las complicaciones derivadas de la situación política e institucional del país con respecto a la caficultura: cambios de gobierno, cambios de leyes, numerosos impuestos y numerosos trámites para la comercialización del café no ayudan a las cooperativas a alcanzar sus objetivos. La opinión más extendida entre las cooperativas es que el gobierno les debe prestar una mayor atención para que el sector café se modernice y se desarrolle. Dicha atención podría traducirse en mejores oportunidades y garantías financieras y en la eliminación de posibles trabas y cargas burocráticas que limitan el apoyo de las cooperativas a las organizaciones que forman parte de ellas. Una medida concreta propuesta en el curso del presente estudio es revisar la Ley de equidad tributaria, la cual establece un impuesto para las exportaciones brutas cuyo valor supera los 40 millones de córdobas, y que por tanto afecta considerablemente a las cooperativas, encargadas de la exportación del café de un gran número de caficultores.En relación con el papel actual y potencial de las cooperativas en los esfuerzos de adaptación al cambio climático la principal limitación de las cooperativas es que carecen de los recursos financieros y técnicos suficientes. Además de favorecer la transición hacia una producción agrícola más respetuosa y adaptable a los cambios, las políticas públicas de Nicaragua deberían facilitar el fortalecimiento de las cooperativas en este frente, a través de apoyo técnico y financiero por parte de las agencias gubernamentales y en colaboración con entes internacionales.Muchos de los pequeños caficultores en Nicaragua son completamente dependientes de la producción del café para su subsistencia, lo que les hace especialmente vulnerables ante factores externos como el precio del café en el mercado, y el cambio climático.El potencial del café nicaragüense para ingresar en los mercados de calidad y de especialidades, que reciben un mejor precio en el mercado, ha sido reconocido como uno de los más altos comparado con el resto de países productores de café del mundo (Varangis et al., 2002). Un aumento de la competitividad del sector podría tener consecuencias económicas y sociales positivas en el mundo rural de Nicaragua. No obstante, a día de hoy, las políticas públicas no han conseguido hacer avanzar al sector café en esta dirección y Nicaragua demuestra ir por detrás de otros países de la región en cuanto a la competitiva de su sector cafetalero. La principal conclusión que puede extraerse de nuestro estudio es que las iniciativasNoviembre, 2016públicas en Nicaragua carecen de recursos y capacidad suficientes para llegar de forma individual, directa y en el momento preciso a todos los caficultores, y más concretamente al pequeño caficultor.En este contexto, las cooperativas ofrecen una red institucional que puede apoyar de manera efectiva y directa al agricultor. Como consecuencia, el fortalecimiento de las cooperativas podría constituir una de las medidas más efectivas para garantizar un más y mejor desarrollo de la caficultura nicaragüense en general y de la producción por el pequeño caficultor, en particular. Las áreas en las que las cooperativas de primer nivel deben seguir haciendo esfuerzos para mejorar su apoyo a los pequeños caficultores incluyen promover la agrupación de los mismos e incrementar la asistencia técnica y mejorar la información sobre el mercado y el acceso a los mercados. Las organizaciones de segundo nivel deberían centrarse en ofrecer una investigación y extensión más sistematizadas; fortalecer las organizaciones existentes en las distintas comunidades a las que pertenecen las cooperativas miembros y promover su integración en las redes locales de intercambio de información. Finalmente, las cooperativas de tercer nivel deberían fortalecer los mecanismos de gestión de riesgos de producción y de mercado, estar más presentes en las plataformas nacionales de concertación y toma de decisiones relacionadas con la caficultura e incrementar su nivel de integración y colaboración con grandes productores para gestionar en bloque la modernización, investigación y financiamiento del sector.El apoyo de las cooperativas en la gestión de riesgos de producción y riesgos de mercado por los pequeños productores es especialmente relevante en un contexto donde las variaciones en el clima pueden aumentar considerablemente los riesgos. Este apoyo puede traducirse en diseminar el conocimiento sobre el cambio climático entre los pequeños productores y ayudarles a definir estrategias de adaptación diferenciadas, acordes a las condiciones socioeconómicas, ambientales y los retos específicos de cada lugar. En este sentido, las cooperativas ubicadas en las diferentes zonas cafetaleras del país deberían apoyarse en los numerosos estudios existentes, desarrollados por los diferentes centros de investigación nacionales e internacionales, y de esta forma determinar e implementar las medidas de adaptación con mayor efectividad. El apoyo en la gestión de riesgos puede asimismo traducirse en instrumentos financieros y de mercado que permiten al pequeño productor protegerse ante fluctuaciones en la cosecha y el precio del café. Algunas de las medidas que se pueden explorar son los seguros de precios y los contratos garantizados.Una fuerte capacidad institucional dentro de las cooperativas es esencial para el éxito de un programa de gestión de riesgos que combine mejoras agronómicas con estrategias de mercado. Las cooperativas de segundo y tercer grado pueden jugar un papel crucial en el desarrollo de las capacidades institucionales de las asociaciones más pequeñas.Las políticas públicas podrían apoyar la acción de las cooperativas brindándoles un mayor apoyo técnico y financiero, facilitando la colaboración entre las distintas iniciativas de desarrollo que estén teniendo lugar en las distintas áreas del país y promoviendo la inversión internacional en proyectos que promuevan la investigación y producción de café sostenible. Otras medidas que podrían fomentarse desde las instituciones públicas incluyen la generación y transferencia de tecnologías sobre el café en un contexto de cambio climático. Además, para el fomento de la competitividad dentro del sector o la diversificación de la economía rural mediante la producción de otros cultivos y el desarrollo de otras actividades productivas, el rol del gobierno es importante a la hora de facilitar información e infraestructura.Noviembre, 2016Las cooperativas, por su parte, deben definir sus planes operativos y estratégicos en línea con los planteamientos establecidos en las políticas de desarrollo nacionales, entre las que se pueden mencionar el Plan de Adaptación a la Variabilidad y el Cambio Climático del año 2013 y el Plan Nacional de Desarrollo humano 2012-2016. La calidad y el potencial de estos planes han sido reconocimos a nivel regional e internacional. Su efectiva implementación por los entes gubernamentales pasa por el compromiso y la participación de todos los actores implicados.El Programa de Investigación de CGIAR en Cambio Climático, Agricultura y Seguridad Alimentaria (CCAFS), liderado por el Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), reúne algunos de los mejores investigadores del mundo en la ciencia agrícola, investigación para el desarrollo, las ciencias del clima y de la tierra, para identificar y abordar las interacciones más importantes, las sinergias y disyuntivas entre el cambio climático, la agricultura y la seguridad alimentaria. www.ccafs.cgiar.org Bioversity International genera evidencia científica, prácticas de manejo y opciones de política para salvaguardar y utilizar la biodiversidad agrícola y forestal del mundo, con el fin de alcanzar y mantener la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional. www.bioversityinternational.org Bioversity International is a CGIAR Research Centre. CGIAR is a global research partnership for a food-secure future. www.cgiar.org"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0882583880.json b/main/part_2/0882583880.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f79767bdf5db97d5bd40e880a615abbcc97ad624 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0882583880.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f5ad392550c9b76f6d3fc4933028cdaf","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/be5ef89c-40d3-43ed-83c8-3fe944659268/retrieve","id":"769179628"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"afefc681-1ac0-486a-94f0-ec56bbb8fd04","content":"por facilitar mi participación en la realización de esta actividad. También expreso mi agradecimiento a M. Carmen de Vicente (Generation Challenge Program, antes Bioversity International) por su gestión, empeño, estímulo y apoyo para la ejecución de todas las actividades involucradas en el desarrollo de este trabajo; a Molly Jahn (University of Wisconsin, antes Cornell University) por su hospitalidad y por ofrecer las instalaciones de su laboratorio de Cornell University; a Heiber Cárdenas (Universidad del Valle) por la supervisión y constante interés en la conclusión cabal de este estudio; y a Shanna Moore, Mary Kreitinger, Sherry Roof y Michael Mazourek (Jahn Lab en Cornell University) por su disposición de ayuda y apoyo durante la realización de esta actividad. Asimismo, manifiesto mi gratitud a todas aquellas personas que fueron guarda y custodios de este trabajo y de su autor. v TABLA DE CONTENIDO Pag.Pag.Tabla 1. Lista de los genotipos usados en este estudio. Las columnas presentan la especie botánica, la abreviatura usada en los análisis de datos, el grupo resultante del análisis de conglomerados, el nombre del genotipo o el número de la entrada y el grado de picante. 25Tabla 2. Condiciones de amplificación y electroforesis para los 21 SSR evaluados. TE: tiempo de electroforesis en minutos. 28Tabla 3. Datos sobre el número de alelos, número de alelos raros, número de genotipos con alelos raros y múltiples, rango del tamaño alélico, frecuencia alélica más alta y contenido informativo polimórfico (PIC) observados en los 42 genotipos de Capsicum para los 21 microsatélites. Crom.: cromosoma. 30 Figura 1. Relaciones genéticas de los 42 genotipos evaluados, obtenidas con los 208 alelos de los 21 SSR usando el coeficiente de similitud de Dice y el método UPGMA. 33Figura 2. Distribución espacial de los grupos de genotipos, obtenida con el análisis de correspondencia múltiple. 34El potencial genético del germoplasma de ají (Capsicum) está subutilizado y merece más investigación. La selección cuidadosa de marcadores moleculares es un paso esencial para estimular la comparación mundial de germoplasma de Capsicum y para promover su uso y conservación adecuados. Durante este trabajo se evaluó un conjunto de 21 microsatélites, que fueron diseñados para Capsicum, empleando un grupo diverso de 42 genotipos de ají que representaron 12 especies de este género. Se detectaron 208 alelos en los 21 loci evaluados. El nivel de polimorfismo entre los 42 genotipos se evaluó calculando el contenido de información polimórfica (PIC) para cada loci. Los valores del PIC estuvieron entre 0.546 (Ng20) y 0.906 (Ng18), con un promedio por marcador de 0.788. En general, se observaron más alelos raros en los microsatélites que detectaron un mayor número de alelos por locus. La evaluación de las relaciones genéticas entre los genotipos a partir de una matriz de datos binarios, a través de un análisis de conglomerados, permitió la agrupación de los genotipos en grupos que se diferenciaron por su grado de similitud genética y que correspondieron a las diferentes especies taxonómicas. Los análisis permitieron concluir que los 21 microsatélites podrían usarse como una herramienta estándar para la evaluación mundial de la diversidad real del germoplasma de Capsicum que se conserva tanto en colecciones ex situ como in situ. Esta es la primera vez que los marcadores microsatélite son usados para evaluar simultáneamente la diversidad genética de 12 especies del género Capsicum.Palabras clave: Microsatélites, diversidad genética, germoplasma, distancia genéticaLos frutos del género Capsicum son valorados en el mundo entero como especia y hortaliza.Por ejemplo, durante 2005 en los Estados Unidos los ajíes campana y pimienta, los cuales sólo representan una porción de los frutos producidos por las especies de este género, tuvieron en el mercado en fresco un valor superior a los 600 millones de dólares. Esta cifra convirtió al ají en la cuarta hortaliza más comercializada de este país, después del tomate, la lechuga y la cebolla (The National Agricultural Library, consulta: Marzo de 2007).Una de las características más sobresaliente del fruto del ají es su sabor picante. Esta condición es conferida por una familia de compuestos alcaloides denominados capsicinoides, la cual es distintiva del género Capsicum (Bosland, 1999). La necesidad de ajíes con niveles diferentes de picante va en aumento debido a la creciente demanda del mercado por productos que contengan capsicinoides. Actualmente se requieren ajíes muy picantes para la preparación de las oleoresinas utilizadas en sustancias de defensa (p.e., para controlar motines) y como repelente de animales (Mathur et al., 2000), también para usarlos como insecticida eficaz en la agricultura orgánica. Igualmente, el mercado demanda ajíes que presenten resistencia a patógenos y variantes en características de color, forma y tamaño. Sin embargo, un prerrequisito para producir variedades nuevas y mejorar los cultivares existentes es poseer un conocimiento amplio del germoplasma existente.El género Capsicum es nativo de América del Sur y América Central (Walsh & Hoot, 2001) e incluye cinco especies domesticadas y unas 25 especies silvestres (IBPGR, 1983) (Eshbaugh, 1993). La mayoría de los ajíes explotados comercialmente en el mundo pertenecen a la especie C. annuum. El interés por las otras especies está limitado a los mercados locales de las regiones donde son producidas (Eshbaugh, 1993).A pesar de su importancia mundial, la clasificación taxonómica de Capsicum permanece confusa dentro de especies o entre ellas, a lo cual contribuye la utilización de vocablos diferentes (Eshbaugh, 1993) (Andrews, 1996).Las especies silvestres de Capsicum no han sido muy estudiadas. Estas especies a menudo presentan una distribución geográfica restringida a zonas consideradas ecológicamente amenazadas; sin embargo, su germoplasma es de interés para los mejoradores porque contiene genes potencialmente útiles para la resistencia a enfermedades y la tolerancia al estrés abiótico (Bosland & González, 2000). Según el IBPGR (1983), el germoplasma andino de Capsicum es una fuente imprescindible de resistencia a las enfermedades que afectan a los ajíes cultivados y un surtidor importante para aumentar el picante y variar el color del fruto. Por lo tanto, puede considerarse que el potencial del germoplasma silvestre de Capsicum, que representa una fuente de diversidad genética importante, está subutilizado y merece más investigación.Una colección ex situ debe mantener el máximo número de alelos y ser tan pequeña como sea posible para favorecer su conservación eficaz. Sin embargo, el germoplasma es conservado a menudo sin la evaluación de su variabilidad genética, lo cual ha conducido a la formación de colecciones grandes que contienen duplicados de muchas entradas (Hayward & Sackville Hamilton, 1997).Actualmente existen algunas colecciones grandes de germoplasma de Capsicum, entre las que se destacan las mantenidas por el Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA, por su sigla en inglés; aprox. 3000 entradas) y el Centro Asiático de Investigación y Desarrollo de Hortalizas (AVRDC, por su sigla en inglés; aprox. 7000 entradas). Además, universidades y otras instituciones de 21 países de América Latina y el Caribe tienen bancos que conservan colecciones más pequeñas de germoplasma de Capsicum (Knudsen, 2000). No obstante, sólo algunas de estas colecciones han sido parcialmente caracterizadas mediante caracteres morfológicos. Además, ciertas especies de Capsicum no están representadas en las colecciones y tal vez nunca serán incluidas, debido a que el desarrollo agrícola y el crecimiento poblacional están reduciendo sus hábitat naturales (Bosland & González, 2000).Las características morfológicas se han usado tradicionalmente para clasificar las especies; sin embargo, éstas no siempre son suficientes para la clasificación adecuada de una entrada específica en una colección ex situ. Por otro lado, este tipo de caracterización requiere gran cantidad de recursos; p.e., espacio y tiempo (las plantas deben crecer hasta la etapa de floración o fructificación), así como de habilidad para determinar la forma del polen (IBPGR, 1983).Alternativamente, los marcadores moleculares se han convertido en herramientas importantes para hacer selección en labores de mejoramiento, en la identificación de genotipos y en estudios de evolución y organización de los genomas vegetales (Dettori et al., 2001). El análisis de la estructura genética puede revelar que un banco de germoplasma contiene entradas duplicadas o proporcionar información útil para tomar decisiones acerca del mantenimiento de las entradas morfológicamente similares (Hayward & Sackville Hamilton, 1997).Entre las herramientas moleculares, los marcadores microsatélite o repeticiones de secuencia simple (SSR) se han convertido en un marcador de ADN usado exitosamente en numerosos estudios; p.e., en la genotipificación de individuos y protección de variedades de olivo (Cipriani et al., 2002), en evaluación de redundancia genética en una colección ex situ de sorgo (Dean et al., 1999), en estudios de genética de poblaciones en mangle (Rosero-Galindo et al., 2002), en análisis de la diversidad genética en variedades comerciales de arroz (Siwach et al., 2004), en estudios filogenéticos de maíz (Matsuoka et al., 2002) y en flujo de genes en arroz (Song et al., 2003), por mencionar algunos. Esta técnica molecular es ideal en el diseño de estrategias para la conservación de recursos genéticos y formación de colecciones núcleo (de Vicente, 2002).Durante este trabajo se evaluó un conjunto de microsatélites, que fueron diseñados para Capsicum (Nagy et al., 1998;Lee et al., 2004), empleando un grupo diverso de genotipos de ají. El objetivo de este trabajo fue seleccionar un subgrupo de estos marcadores como herramienta de caracterización molecular para hacer posible la comparación de colecciones de germoplasma de Capsicum por grupos de investigación en cualquier parte del mundo.Este estudio incluyó 42 genotipos que representan 12 especies del género Capsicum (Tabla 1).El germoplasma fue obtenido de variedades comercialmente disponibles y de la Red deInformación sobre Recursos de Germoplasma (GRIN, por su sigla en inglés) del USDA. Al menos tres semillas por accesión fueron puestas a germinar en invernadero bajo condiciones estándar (16 horas de luz y ocho horas de oscuridad con fertilización semanal) entre seis y ocho semanas, aproximadamente.Se colectaron hojas jóvenes y frescas para hacer la extracción de ADN siguiendo el protocolo de Doyle & Doyle (1987). El tejido foliar de todos los individuos pertenecientes a un mismo genotipo se mezcló para extraer el ADN. La calidad del ADN extraído se evaluó mediante electroforesis en geles al 1% de agarosa usando tampón TBE 0.5X (Tris borato EDTA) y tinción con bromuro de etidio. El gel fue expuesto a luz ultravioleta y fotografiado. Cada ADN fue diluido a una concentración final de 2.0 ng/µL y almacenado a -20ºC hasta su uso.Inicialmente se evaluaron 54 pares de cebadores de microsatélites. El número de fragmentos amplificados, el polimorfismo y la resolución de las bandas fueron los criterios empleados para elegir los 21 microsatélites que luego se utilizaron para evaluar la diversidad molecular de los 42 genotipos incluidos en el estudio (Tabla 2).Los 15 SSR designados en la Tabla 2 como Ng fueron reportados por Nagy et al. (1998) y sus reacciones de amplificación se realizaron en un volumen total de 15.0 µL que contenía 5.0 ng de ADN, 0.5 µM de cada cebador, 0.125 mM de cada dNTP, 1.5 µL de tampón 10X (0.1 M Tris pH 8.3, 0.5 M KCl, 7.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1% gelatina) y una unidad de Taq polimerasa. Los seis SSR de la Tabla 2 que están nombrados como Bd fueron reportados por Lee et al. (2004) y su amplificación se hizo en un volumen final de 10.0 µL con 6.0 ng de ADN, 0.3 µM de cada cebador, 0.1 mM de cada dNTP, 1.0 µL de tampón 10X (0.1 M Tris pH 8.3, 0.5 M KCl, 7.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1% gelatina) y una unidad de Taq polimerasa.Todas las amplificaciones se realizaron en un termociclador programable PTC-225 (MJ Research Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) utilizando las condiciones mostradas en la Tabla 2.Algunas amplificaciones se realizaron haciendo ciclos en cascada para disminuir la amplificación de productos no específicos (Don et al., 1991). Las reacciones de amplificación con ciclos en cascada empezaban en una temperatura de hibridación alta que iba disminuyendo en 1ºC por cada ciclo hasta llegar a las respectivas temperaturas de hibridación de los cebadores (Tabla 2).La electroforesis de los productos amplificados se realizó en geles desnaturalizantes con poliacrilamida al 4% con 7 M de urea y tampón TBE 0.5X. A cada producto de la amplificación se le adicionó 6.0 µL de tampón [95% (v/v) formamida, 20 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.05% (p/v) azul de bromofenol y xilen cianol FF], y luego se cargaron 5.0 µL de esta mezcla en los pozos del gel.Las muestras se dejaron migrar (2000V, 75W, 50mA) e inmediatamente después se tiñeron con nitrato de plata. El tiempo de electroforesis para cada marcador se muestra en la Tabla 2.Después de la tinción con plata se observaron grupos discretos de dos a cinco bandas (lo que se suele llamar \"tartamudeo\") en la mayoría de los marcadores. El \"tartamudeo\" se refiere a productos de la PCR que difieren en tamaño de la banda (alelo) principal haciendo que cada alelo (banda) observado en el gel parezca ser más de una banda (Litt et al., 1993).Veintisiete muestras se añadieron en cada gel como control para evaluar la reproducibilidad de los patrones y comparar bandas entre geles. También se escogieron al azar 15 genotipos que se amplificaron separadamente y se corrieron varias veces en geles diferentes.Para cada microsatélite se determinó el tamaño (medido en número de nucleótidos) de la banda amplificada más intensamente, con base en su migración relativa a la de los marcadores de peso molecular (escaleras de ADN de 50 pb y 10 pb, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, USA).Las bandas se registraron manualmente en estado presente (1) o ausente (0) y se generó una matriz de datos binarios. El contenido de información polimórfica (PIC), el cual representa la probabilidad de diferenciar dos genotipos con un SSR, se calculó como; donde p i y q j son las frecuencias relativas de los alelos i-ésimo y j-ésimo en un marcador dado, y n es el número total de alelos detectados por el marcador.A partir de la matriz binaria se efectuó un análisis de similitud genética usando el coeficiente de Dice (Dice, 1945) [2a/(2a + b + c)] para hacer todos los pares de comparaciones de genotipos; donde a es el número de bandas presentes simultáneamente en los dos genotipos, b es el número de bandas con presencia exclusiva en un genotipo, c es el número de bandas con presencia exclusiva del otro genotipo, y el factor dos permite diferenciar genotipos con niveles bajos de similitud. La ventaja que ofrece este coeficiente para el análisis de los datos es que cuenta el porcentaje de bandas compartidas entre dos genotipos, dándole más importancia a aquellas bandas presentes en ambos, y excluye las bandas ausentes en ambos genotipos, ya que éstas no necesariamente contribuyen a la similitud. Posteriormente se formaron grupos de individuos por su distancia mínima promedio con respecto al grupo empleando el método de la unión media (UPGMA) (Sneath & Sokal, 1973). El resultado de este análisis de conglomerados se representó en forma de dendrograma, utilizando la opción SAHN Clustering del paquete NTSYS-pc 2.02i para taxonomía numérica (Rohlf, 1998).El anterior análisis de agrupación se complementó realizando un análisis de correspondencia múltiple (ACM) a partir de la matriz binaria. El ACM utiliza el patrón de bandas de cada genotipo para representar en un espacio métrico tridimensional las relaciones entre los individuos. La gráfica resultante muestra la ubicación de los individuos en el espacio, permitiendo apreciar su dispersión y la estructura poblacional de la muestra estudiada. Los cálculos se realizaron con el procedimiento Corresp. Anal. del paquete NTSYS-pc 2.02i para taxonomía numérica (Rohlf, 1998).Se detectaron 208 alelos en los 21 loci evaluados. El promedio del número de alelos por locus fue 9.9, con un rango desde cinco (Ng20; Bd70) hasta 16 alelos (Ng17). La Tabla 3 presenta la descripción cualitativa de los 21 microsatélites según el número de alelos detectados. Los alelos de menor peso molecular (aprox. 82 pb) y de mayor peso molecular (aprox. 800 pb) fueron detectados por los microsatélites Bd22 y Ng15, respectivamente.Los alelos que fueron observados solamente en uno o dos de los 42 genotipos evaluados (<5%) se consideraron alelos raros. Se registraron 102 alelos raros en 20 loci (Tabla 3). La cantidad de alelos por locus y el número de alelos raros mostraron una correlación lineal positiva significativa (r = 0.90; P < 0.0001). Los microsatélites Ng6 (78%) y Ng7 (73%) detectaron el mayor porcentaje de alelos raros.La ausencia de amplificación para una combinación particular genotipo-marcador indicó la presencia de genotipos con alelos nulos en el locus en cuestión. Los alelos nulos son alelos que no son amplificados durante la PCR debido, tal vez, a polimorfismo en los sitios de hibridación de uno o ambos cebadores (Dakin & Avis, 2004). Los ensayos que detectaron alelos nulos se repitieron un mínimo de dos veces para asegurar que la ausencia de amplificación no se debía a un error experimental.Trece de los 21 loci presentaron entre dos (5%) y 10 genotipos (24%) con alelos nulos (Tabla 3). Los dos genotipos de C. rhomboideum mostraron alelos nulos en estos 13 loci; además, estos genotipos fueron los únicos que exhibieron alelos nulos en siete (54%) de los 13 loci. A pesar de la conocida prevalencia de los alelos nulos, su dinámica evolutiva y modelo de variación en las poblaciones no han sido examinados analíticamente; por lo tanto, actualmente se desconoce cuál es su verdadero impacto sobre la estimación de la diferenciación poblacional.Cualquier combinación genotipo-marcador que produjera dos grupos de bandas sugería que el genotipo presentaba heterogeneidad (mezcla de alelos o alelos múltiples). El 62% de los loci evaluados detectaron genotipos con alelos múltiples. En promedio, para cada locus 1.6 genotipos presentaron alelos múltiples (Tabla 3). Los loci Ng4 (6), Ng7 (6) y Ng12 (5)presentaron la mayor cantidad de genotipos con alelos múltiples.En promedio, en un locus determinado el alelo común fue compartido por el 31% de los genotipos evaluados (Tabla 3). La Tabla 3 muestra que hubo una variación considerable en la frecuencia del alelo más común. El número de alelos por locus y la frecuencia del alelo más común en el locus estuvieron negativamente correlacionados (r = -0.66, P = 0.0011).El nivel de polimorfismo entre los 42 genotipos se evaluó calculando el contenido de información polimórfica (PIC) para cada loci. Los valores del PIC estuvieron entre 0.546 (Ng20) y 0.906 (Ng18), con un promedio de 0.788 por marcador. Estos valores mostraron una correlación lineal positiva significativa con el número de alelos (r = 0.77; P < 0.0001) y una correlación baja con el rango del tamaño de los alelos (r = 0.13; P = 0.5835), indicando que los microsatélites que detectaron más alelos fueron los más informativos, sin importar las diferencias de tamaño entre los alelos que revelaron.Los 21 SSR usados en el estudio permitieron distinguir los 42 genotipos evaluados. Por otro lado, el análisis de las relaciones genéticas entre todos los genotipos sugirió la existencia de siete grupos principales que reúnen a 33 de los genotipos evaluados (Figura 1). Al truncar el dendrograma en el 50% de similitud, los conglomerados corresponden principalmente a: A) C. & Fulton, 2003). Los 21 microsatélites usados en este trabajo permitieron observar un total de 208 alelos, con un número promedio de alelos por locus de 9.9. La correlación lineal positiva significativa (r = 0.77; P < 0.0001) del valor del PIC con el número de alelos por SSR indica que los marcadores que detectaron más alelos serían mejores para hacer genotipificación y análisis de diversidad. Esta correlación significa que cualquiera de estos dos estimadores es útil para determinar el valor de un marcador en estudios de diversidad. El promedio del valor del PIC de este trabajo fue similar al promedio reportado para trigo (0.71) y Brassica rapa (0.71) (Prasad et al., 2000;Suwabe et al., 2002).Los alelos raros son altamente informativos para la genotipificación de variedades (Jain et al., 2004). Ellos pueden ser indicadores de la presencia de variantes genéticas únicas o de poblaciones diferenciadas. Por otro lado, la deriva genética conduce rápidamente a la pérdida de estos alelos. Sin embargo, esta susceptibilidad a sufrir los efectos de la deriva genética convierte a los alelos raros en un instrumento útil para la evaluación de la erosión genética que ocurre durante el manejo de las colecciones de germoplasma. Por lo tanto, varios de los microsatélites evaluados en este estudio podrían ser útiles en la identificación eficaz de variedades o especies del género Capsicum, debido a que detectaron alelos raros; además, ayudarían en la toma de decisiones sobre la forma más eficiente de propagar y mantener colecciones ex situ de germoplasma de Capsicum.El nivel de polimorfismo de los 21 microsatélites, evaluado a través de los valores del PIC, fue muy alto (valor promedio = 0.788; rango desde 0.546 a 0.906). Lo anterior significa que el polimorfismo de estos marcadores microsatélite sería útil para descubrir entradas duplicadas en las colecciones ex situ de germoplasma de Capsicum y en la resolución de disputas relacionadas con la propiedad de semillas. Asimismo, los altos valores informativos y la capacidad de distinguir los genotipos empleados en el estudio, como lo muestran el análisis de conglomerados y el ACM, refuerzan la utilidad potencial que tendrían estos microsatélites para ayudar a diferenciar especies o variedades del género Capsicum.Más del 60% de los microsatélites evaluados detectaron genotipos con alelos múltiples (Tabla 3). Este polimorfismo podría ser: i) el resultado de una heterocigosidad remanente en algunos genotipos o ii) el producto de la heterogeneidad producida por la mezcla involuntaria de semilla. La heterocigosidad residual podría ser el resultado de alogamia y sería una característica previsible en materiales que no hayan sido mejorados para obtener líneas puras.Capsicum es considerado como un cultivo que se reproduce por autopolinización (Allard, 1971). Sin embargo, las tasas de alogamia que presenta sugieren que debería ser considerado una planta con fecundación por polinización cruzada facultativa (Tanksley, 1984). En este trabajo, la heterocigosidad no puede distinguirse claramente de la heterogeneidad, debido a que el tejido vegetal de tres muestras se mezcló para extraer el ADN. Sin embargo, la presencia de variantes alélicas tiene gran valor para encontrar marcadores propios de un genotipo.La mayoría de los genotipos evaluados en este estudio (genotipos 1 al 30) han sido multiplicados por autopolinización en los invernaderos de Cornell University (grupo de trabajo de la Dra. Molly Jahn) durante varios años para obtener semillas que se usan en los programas de mejoramiento. Aunque no se pueden descartar los errores involuntarios durante la manipulación, lo anterior permitiría asumir una probabilidad baja de que hayan ocurrido mezclas de semilla durante el manejo de estos genotipos; en consecuencia, los alelos múltiples detectados en algunos genotipos manejados en Cornell University (p.e., Jalapeño 3575, Jalapeño 1493, PapriQueen y Praetermisum) sugieren que los microsatélites evaluados en este trabajo serían útiles para descubrir nueva variabilidad o variantes alélicas que puedan usarse como marcadores propios de un genotipo.Los genotipos restantes fueron obtenidos del USDA (genotipos 31 al 42); sin embargo, se desconoce de qué forma se han manipulado estos materiales durante su conservación en esta institución. Esto significa que los genotipos con alelos múltiples de este subconjunto (p.e.;53chi, 54chi y 55chi) tal vez están indicando que hubo mezcla involuntaria de semilla durante el manejo del germoplasma o algún error en la asignación del número de introducción (PI) en el banco de germoplasma del cual se obtuvieron inicialmente los genotipos. Por lo tanto, este estudio presenta varios marcadores que se podrían utilizar en los bancos de germoplasma como una herramienta para detectar errores inconscientes que se cometen durante el manejo del germoplasma.La conservación de los recursos genéticos se justifica fomentando la utilización de las colecciones ex situ; sin embargo, el cumplimiento de este objetivo se dificulta debido a que los investigadores de los sectores privado y público tienen necesidades diferentes. Además, los procedimientos experimentales para encontrar marcadores polimórficos pueden variar entre laboratorios y la comparación de los datos puede ser problemática. Por lo tanto, la cooperación entre los bancos de germoplasma es indispensable para alcanzar la máxima eficiencia en el manejo de los recursos genéticos. Tal cooperación implica el intercambio de metodologías y tecnologías para investigar, documentar, manejar y utilizar los recursos genéticos. Debido a que la diversidad genética de las especies conservadas ex situ está distribuida en los bancos de germoplasma, la comparación de diferentes colecciones es importante para determinar cuánta diversidad de un cultivo está siendo conservada y cómo está distribuida entre distintos bancos.Este trabajo presenta un grupo de marcadores microsatélites que son útiles en la evaluación de la diversidad genética del género Capsicum. Debido a su polimorfismo, estos microsatélites pueden usarse para evaluar cambios en la estructura genética de las colecciones ex situ de germplasma de Capsicum. Obtener información cuantitativa sobre las frecuencias alélicas serviría como punto de partida para tomar decisiones adecuadas en la conservación de germoplasma de Capsicum con variantes alélicas de frecuencia baja, en la genotipificación de variedades, en la búsqueda de fuentes de diversidad genética y para analizar la historia reciente de una variedad comercial o del germoplasma propio de un área geográfica.Usar estos marcadores para adquirir conocimiento sobre las colecciones de Capsicum permitirá incrementar el uso del germoplasma ex situ empleado en el desarrollo de variedades mejoradas que se adapten con éxito a diferentes condiciones ambientales y que presenten tolerancia a las plagas y niveles superiores de productividad. Adicionalmente, el conocimiento obtenido servirá para establecer modelos y prioridades en los métodos de conservación de los recursos genéticos a través de la identificación de vacíos y de la evaluación de la representatividad de las colecciones ex situ.Esta es la primera vez que los marcadores microsatélite son usados para evaluar simultáneamente la diversidad genética de 12 especies del género Capsicum. Por lo tanto, el presente trabajo es un punto de partida para la escogencia de marcadores microsatélite que puedan usarse en la caracterización de germoplasma de Capsicum y en la selección asistida por marcadores. Asimismo, este estudio puede ser tomado como la base de futuros trabajos que incluyan más especies y más entradas por especie, con el fin de encontrar más marcadores que permitan tener un conocimiento amplio de la diversidad genética del género Capsicum. Figura 2. Distribución espacial de los grupos de genotipos, obtenida con el análisis de correspondencia múltiple."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0889393158.json b/main/part_2/0889393158.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e873705cea362da5add22fa320e00be50b89b510 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0889393158.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d6ee136fdbddfbdc4e8db97d270f00b9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/00ac67a4-3220-4023-a92f-44c139b42a8e/retrieve","id":"-1711784589"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3b8b65c6-ef6a-46e8-9279-bdf13041ed54","content":"Bioversity International would like to thank all those organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of the illustrated guide on \"Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking banana\" by sharing their knowledge and experience, providing constructive feedback and contributing high quality pictures during the development of this guide.The development and production of this guide available in four languages (English, French, Spanish and Arabic) was supported by financial contributions from the Austria Development Agency, the Common Fund for Commodities (CFC), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas and USAID through the TARGET project.capitulo 1: ¿Es importante la calidad del material de siembra para la productividad de las plantaciones de las musaceas?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking banana Chapter 1: Is the quality of planting material important for banana productivity?This illustrated guide summarizes the key practices for producing clean planting material of banana with a high yield potential for smallholders, depending on the pests and diseases which are present.The guide is also designed to contribute to better planning of the propagation of planting material for rural development and disaster relief projects. A simpler version of this manual is available as grower fact sheets well-illustrated with photographs. The legends and explanations for the appropriate methods can be translated into local languages.Dessert bananas, plantains and cooking bananas 1 are an important smallholder crop in the tropics and subtropics, providing food security, dietary diversity and income to millions of rural households. Every year rural households plant or replant fields of bananas, using more than 20-30 billion suckers or some other form of vegetative planting material.A simplified version of this manual is available for producers in the form of well illustrated field sheets with photographs. Descriptions and explanations of the different methods may be translatedin local languages or dialects if necessary.chapteR 1: Is the quality of planting material important for banana productivity?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking banana 6Each sucker is an opportunity to improve the yield and the quality of smallholder production, but each sucker can also contribute to an unproductive plant. As with all vegetatively propagated crops, poorly selected planting material can transmit insect pests, fungal and bacterial diseases and viruses. Planting material infected with pests and diseases can result in yield losses in the first harvest of 20-100% depending on the problem and can reduce the number of harvests by half or more.Obtaining sufficient clean planting material is a big challenge to smallholders, because each year they may need not just five or ten suckers, but hundreds to thousands. If only 10-20% of the planting material is infected, pests and diseases readily pass to healthy plants, reducing both bunch size and the number of harvests. Some diseases, such as banana bunchy top virus and Fusarium wilt, are lethal and new plantings with infected suckers will produce nothing.For smallholders with a diverse backyard garden, suckers free of pests and diseases are very important, although they may prefer a diversity of cultivars that produce a few bunches each month for home consumption (GO).capitulo 1: ¿Es importante la calidad del material de siembra para la productividad de las plantaciones de las musaceas?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking banana 7 chapteR 1: Is the quality of planting material important for banana productivity?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaEach sucker which is planted has the potential to produce a bunch, the size and characteristics of which depend on the mother plant. Over thousands of years, farmers have selected individuals with special characteristics to plant and replant, thereby generating the world's banana diversity. East African farmers have over 200 cultivars of their AAA Highland banana type. Today the challenge for each household is to plant suckers with a slightly higher yield potential at each new planting, by selecting suckers from the best mother plants and eliminating the least productive plants.Smallholders producing for the market and for home consumption concentrate on one or two cultivars and are interested in long lived plantations producing several harvests. They should use planting material without pests and diseases. Through careful selection of mother plants they can also improve the yield potential of their plantation at each new planting or replanting (CS).chapteR 1: Is the quality of planting material important for banana productivity?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking banana 8In addition to disease and pest transmission and yield potential, the quality of the planting material also contributes to the timing of the harvest. Suckers of many different sizes planted in the same field will produce their first bunches during a much longer period than suckers or other planting materials which are highly uniform.For home consumption, production spread over a long period is useful, but in producing for markets more bunches in a shorter time period may be a more profitable strategy. Highly uniform planting material can be used to target production to specific periods of the year.High input, high density annual plantings can be used to concentrate harvests in a short period of time when prices are high. Such systems demand clean planting material of very uniform size with high yield potential (LP).capitulo 2: ¿Cuáles son las principales plagas insectiles y enfermedades transportadas por el material vegetativo de siembra?capitulo 2: ¿Cuáles son las principales plagas insectiles y enfermedades transportadas por el material vegetativo de siembra?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaChapter 2: What are the primary pests and diseases transmitted in vegetative planting material?Many different insect pests and diseases are found in suckers or other planting material and these may be moved from the old field where they originate to the new field where the material is planted. These different pests and diseases can be grouped into three categories according to how easy they are to manage by farmers and by other production services agencies.1) Nematodes and banana weevils: these pests which occur quite frequently can be easily managed by growers with little risk.2) Bacterial and fungal wilts and banana streak virus in plantains (AAB): this set of problems requires special management on-farm, although some risk must be faced.3) Banana bunchy top virus, banana streak virus in AAA dessert bananas, and other viruses: these disease problems can only resolved by specialized off-farm propagation techniques.Note: Bunchy top virus, bract mosaic virus, Fusarium wilt Tropical race 4 and bacterial wilts (Xanthomonas and Ralstonia) are only found in certain regions. International and national quarantine aims to reduce the spread of these diseases to new uninfected areas. Consult your local authorities to learn whether the diseases are present in your country or area.chapteR 2: What are the primary pests and diseases transmitted in vegetative planting material?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaSeveral plant-parasitic nematodes and the banana weevil are transmitted through infected planting material, but simple on-farm practices can produce relatively clean planting material.Nematodes are small worm-like animals living in plant roots and the soil. They are not visible to humans, but the damage they cause warns the farmer that they are present. They weaken roots and plants frequently fall over when the bunch is still very small. When the attack is severe, plants without bunches may also topple (PC).Root gall nematodes produce roots which are deformed (IPB).Burrowing and root lesion nematodes cause reddish-brown lesions to healthy roots which are normally white. Roots turn black with more severe damage (CS).chapteR 2: What are the primary pests and diseases transmitted in vegetative planting material?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking banana Key practices for pest problems easily managed on farm:1) select planting material from plantations free of the problem or with low infection rates, such as young, vigorous plantations in their first production cycle; 2) pare and/or boil suckers to minimize nematodes or weevils present on the suckers.Discard suckers with excessive brown or black corm material; 3) apply sucker sanitation practices (paring and/or boiling) close to where suckers were extracted. This avoids contamination of the field to be planted with infested roots or discarded corm parts; 4) store sanitized suckers distant from any banana plantation; 5) ensure clean substrate in nursery bags (free of plant parasitic nematodes) if macropropagation techniques are used.The larvae of banana weevils feed on banana corms and pseudostems, forming a network of tunnels lined with black dead tissue. This feeding weakens the corm and plants often snap off at the corm (PC).(PC) (PC) (PC)Banana weevils are present in banana fields in three life stages. The adults live among banana residues and move into tunnels formed by the larvae. They lay eggs on the corm which hatch into larvae which feed on the corm and pseudostem.chapteR 2: What are the primary pests and diseases transmitted in vegetative planting material?Bacterial wilt causes yellowing and wilting of the older leaves, leading to plant death. Suckers should never be taken from plants with these symptoms or any neighbouring plants, since the bacteria are also carried in water or insects. Fields with bacterial wilt infections generally should not be used as a source of suckers (OB).Plants with Fusarium, a fungus, show progressive leaf yellowing, starting with the oldest leaves, followed by a wilt and collapse of leaves (PC).Erwinia, a bacterium, can be detected by the presence of soft, water soaked tissue which is quickly invaded by other organisms causing tissue rot (PC).Good multiplication practices should be used to reduce nematode and weevil transmission in all banana planting material. Additional practices are needed on farm or in local nurseries to reduce the risks of transmission of bacterial and fungal diseases in planting material.Fusarium Tropical Race 4 is a particularly lethal fungal strain appearing throughout Asia, since it attacks a wide group of bananas.Banana streak virus (BSV) is found commonly in the B genome of plantains (AAB) and a few hybrids having the B genome where it makes up part of the gene sequence. These sequences are usually silent, resulting in normal production in plantain (AAB) plantations originating from suckers. Abiotic stress such as cool temperatures or drought, as well as tissue culture multiplication procedures, can activate the BSV sequence and result in plants with symptoms and reduced production. Practices on-farm, primarily the elimination of plants with symptoms, offer the best option for reducing the impact of BSV. Molecular tools are available to detect if plantain material has dormant viral sequences, but these are not commonly employed commercially. BSV in other cultivars (principally AAA) is described in the section on \"Pest and disease problems requiring specialized off-farm propagation techniques\".chapteR 2: What are the primary pests and diseases transmitted in vegetative planting material?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaBacterial and fungal diseases can sometimes be detected in the stem cross section. A healthy stem cross section should be white with no discolouration.When bacterial wilts are present, brownish liquid or ooze appears on the stem cross section often associated with discolouration in the pseudostem (PC).Outer leaves of the stem look water soaked, with off-colour brown tissue, as the problem spreads inward (PC).The fungus invades the roots and vascular system of the plant and brown threads (fungal mycelia) can be seen extending along the pseudostem (PC).(TL)BSV in plantain (AAB) is evidenced by narrow, thick, distorted leaves with chlorotic streaks or blotches which later become necrotic.Stem splitting is common. The presence of BSV also produces breakdown of the leaf whorl at bunch emergence and distorted bunch formation.chapteR 2: What are the primary pests and diseases transmitted in vegetative planting material?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking banana Key practices for pest and disease problems easily managed on farm:For bacterial and fungal wilts:1) do not extract suckers from contaminated fields; 2) if no wilt-free fields are available, extract suckers only from plants distant and upslope from sick plants;3) extract suckers from plants close to harvest, when symptoms may be more clearly expressed. Avoid plants with suspicious symptoms and their neighbouring plants; 4) to prevent dissemination of bacterial wilts, debud all flowering stems as soon after bunch formation as possible; Do not extract suckers from plants with suspicious symptoms and their immediate neighbours; 5) to prevent the spread of bacterial wilts from sucker to sucker through tools, disinfect machete/knife and other tools after each new sucker has been extracted and/or pared. Disinfection is not as useful or effective for fungal wilts; 6) discard any suckers with suspicious discoloration in the stem cross section; 7) pare and select suckers close to the field where they were extracted. This avoids contamination with damaged roots and corm parings of the new field to be planted.For BSV in plantain (AAB):1) avoid extracting suckers from plants with BSV; 2) extract suckers from plants close to harvest, when symptoms may be more clearly expressed; 3) rigorously rogue off-types and plants with BSV symptoms at each stage of multiplication and plantation establishment; 4) replant in areas close to the original plantation to avoid spreading BSV to new, clean areas.Certain types of viruses have a very severe impact on yield. If these viruses are commonly present in planting material in a region, farmers cannot use planting materials obtained from their own or neighbours' plantations. Virus-free tissue-cultured plants or vitroplants must be multiplied in specialized laboratories with virus testing and cleaning protocols.In plants with banana bunchy top virus (BBTV), emerging leaves grow upright and have a stunted, bunched appearance. Each new leaf emerges smaller and narrower with brittle, yellow edges. An important diagnostic characteristic is dark green streaks found on the central midrib, secondary veins and the pseudostem. Dwarfism in banana plant is also significant (CS).Banana bunchy top disease can appear in the suckers, although the adult plant does not present symptoms. The virus is present before the typical symptoms of leaf narrowing and yellowing occur (CS).Plants with BSV often demonstrate stem splitting (P-YT).Banana streak viruses (BSV) in bananas AAA are of several types with common symptoms: chlorotic streaks evolving into necrotic blotches. BSV symptoms described here look very similar to those described earlier for plantain AAB (JCR).Other known viruses include cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and banana mild mosaic virus (BMMV). When occurring alone, these viruses generally cause minimal damage. However, they can cause more serious yield losses if infecting a plant at the same time. CMV may also be more severe if other infected host plants such as watermelon, cucumber and squash have been intercropped.Banana bract mosaic virus (BBrMV) cannot be visually detected in suckers. BBrMV produces mosaics on the leaves which can disappear within 48 hours and a yellow or white-red mosaic may appear on the pseudostem. Reddish brown streaks or discolouration on the male bracts help to identify the presence of this virus (CS).Key management practices for pest and disease problems requiring specialized off-farm propagation techniques:1) in regions with BSV in bananas (except AAB plantain) and BBTV, use vitroplants only from tissue culture laboratories with complete virus-screening facilities; 2) when obtaining vitroplants from regions with BBrMV (primarily in Asia), accept vitroplants only from tissue culture laboratories with complete virus-screening facilities. Risk can also be reduced by obtaining vitroplants only from laboratories located in countries free of BBTV; 3) when buying vitroplants, ensure that other viruses such as CMV and BMMV have been cleaned from shoot tips before multiplication; 4) if vitroplants are being used as planting material for macropropagation, use multiple isolation techniques to prevent infection of plants with viruses or bacterial diseases; 5) if using vitroplants for plantain (AAB), rigorously rogue off-types and plants with BSV symptoms at each stage of plant multiplication and plantation establishment.capitulo 3: ¿Qué tan uniforme necesita ser el material de siembra?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaChapter 3: How uniform does the planting material need to be?Many different types of planting material can be extracted from an established banana plantation. Almost any shape or type of sucker or the main corm can be used, either intact or cut into pieces, to plant a new plantation.While many different types of planting material are useful for producing a bunch, some planting materials have a shorter time period from field planting to harvest. A large maiden corm has the shortest interval from field planting to harvest followed by larger and then smaller sword suckers. Peepers, water suckers and new sprouts from buds on the mother corm have a longer interval from field planting to harvest.A mat which has already produced a first harvest may have suckers of different sizes.Even water suckers and quite small suckers known as peepers can be extracted and grown into viable plants in a nursery. Large pseudostems can also be uprooted before flowering or after the bunch has been harvested (PC).Uprooted maiden corm (PC).Large sword sucker (PC). Small sword sucker (CS).chapteR 3: How uniform does the planting material need to be?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaIn addition to the size and age of planting material, there may also be some variability in the Musa type and cultivar. Depending on their objectives, farm households may prefer a diverse plantation for home consumption or a highly uniform plantation to harvest large quantities of a single type in a short period of time.To plant a new field, farmers may need from a few hundred to thousands of suckers or other planting material. The more uniform the planting material is in terms of size and age, the more concentrated will be the harvest over a period of 2-5 months or more. If planting material consists of many different sizes or the field is planted over one to three months, then the harvest will also be spread out.Water sucker (CS). Peepers (PC).capitulo 4: ¿Podemos mejorar el rendimiento potencial a través de la selección de las plantas madre?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaChapter 4: Can we improve the potential yield through the selection of mother plants?The world currently has hundreds of cultivars of dessert bananas, plantains and cooking bananas. For thousands of years farmers in Asia, Africa and the Pacific have been observing their fields and fallows and have been selecting plants with special characteristics.Each of our current cultivars has certain features which make it distinguishable from other cultivars -bunch and finger size and shape; taste, texture and fragrance of fruits; and leaf and stem colour and form. However, each cultivar is also characterized by variability in some of the same features mentioned above. This variability provides an interesting opportunity for small farmers to improve the productivity of their banana fields.Simply stated, planting material should only be taken from plants which have above average performance for important traits such as number of fingers, size of fingers, plant stature, bunching interval and rooting sturdiness. This has a two-way multiplication effect -reduction in plants with inferior traits and increase of plants with superior traits.The export banana companies identify a few elite plants with preferred characteristics in their many plantations. After testing, these are multiplied in tissue culture labs to generate monoclonal lines with many, many plants having very uniform growth and bunch characteristics. This not only increases the yield potential, but also allows planting at a higher density, since all plants have a similar size and fewer plants are shaded by their taller neighbour plants.chapteR 4: Can we improve the potential yield through the selection of mother plants?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaPrinciples for the selection of superior mother plants• identify important characteristics to be targeted in the selection process;• determine minimum or maximum for the characteristics subject to selection;• throughout the year, mark plants at harvest which have the desired characteristics;• select only from plants which are located under normal soil conditions.• avoid plants which are on the field borders or other locations which favour exceptional growth;• avoid plants which have abnormal plant characteristics or show symptoms of prevailing pests and diseases.Suckers selected in this way can be planted or multiplied using diverse techniques.The Taiwan Banana Research Institute has used mass selection to identify plants with a greater tolerance to Fusarium wilt. Each year Taiwanese banana growers replant their banana fields with tissue culture plants, a strategy initially designed to avoid crop losses to typhoons. Since the appearance of Fusarium wilt, scientists and farmers have been selecting plants which continue to grow even though all the neighbouring plants have been affected by Fusarium. Through this strategy new lines of dessert banana (AAA Cavendish) have been identified with tolerance to Fusarium Subtropical Race 4, even though it is generally considered that this group is susceptible to this disease.capitulo 5: ¿Cuáles son los métodos de propagación más comunes?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaChapter 5: What are the most common methods for propagating plants?Five methods are commonly used to obtain planting material for the establishment of new banana plantings. Each method has specific requirements in terms of facilities and equipment, generates planting material at a characteristic rate and has particular risks of pest and disease contamination. The methods range from a few suckers extracted from backyard gardens, to small seedbeds of a few hundred seedlings distributed at the local level to the production of several million vitroplants per year for international export.The simpler techniques are described and illustrated below. In later sections the good practices for different stages of plant multiplication are described.Suckers must be extracted from a mother plant with appropriate techniques to avoid weakening its supporting root system (PC).A banana plant produces suckers which arise from buds on the mother plant. These suckers can be extracted and replanted to establish a new field (CS).capitulo 5: ¿Cuáles son los métodos de propagación más comunes?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananachapteR 5: What are the most common methods for propagating plants?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking banana2) Suckers reproduced in sucker multiplication plotThe sucker multiplication plot is established with good quality, pest and disease free suckers planted at a high density on quality soils, rich in organic matter (JC).When plants initiate flower formation well before flower emergence, plants are decapitated to stop further flower or bunch development and stimulate sprouting of abundant suckers. False decapitation or bending of the pseudostem can also be used, which impedes flowering, but maintains the mother plant, while also stimulating the sprouting of suckers (PC).These suckers can then be extracted for planting into a commercial plantation with adequate practices to minimize pest and disease transmission (JC).Decapitation stimulates the emergence of 10-20 suckers per stem (PC).chapteR 5: What are the most common methods for propagating plants?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaBy the end of 6-8 weeks, plants reach an appropriate size for transplanting into the field. Plants can be grouped by height and number of leaves to ensure more uniform growth and time to harvest (CS).Small cone-shaped suckers of 200-300 g are extracted from a field in production or a sucker multiplication plot (PC).Since all plants are healthy and vigorous in their growth, the new plantation suffers few gaps in the population (PC).Suckers are pared, treated with surface disinfectant and then planted into small nursery bags filled with clean substrate (CS).chapteR 5: What are the most common methods for propagating plants?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking banana 24 4) Propagation from axillary buds Sprouts are planted in nursery bags filled with clean substrate to be grown out for 1-2 months in preparation for transplanting into the field (TL).Suckers are covered in a bed of wet sawdust for several weeks inside a high humidity chamber made of plastic sheeting (TL).Sprouts are carefully cut free from the sucker which is placed back in the chamber for the growth of another set of sprouts. These sprouts are also removed.A single sucker can produce 15-60 shoots during 4-5 months (TL).Leaf sheaths from medium sized sword suckers (200 -500 g) are stripped away individually to expose axillary buds found at the base of each leaf sheath. The primary sprout is destroyed with a X cut across the top of the sucker (TL).Suckers should preferably be extracted from a region free of diseases, subject to quarantine, tested for disease presence and then cleaned, if necessary. The resulting shoot tips are disinfected before being introduced into the sterile lab (YM). Chapter 6: How does the presence of pests and diseases affect the propagation method to be used?In earlier sections three categories of pests and diseases were described -easily managed on farm, requiring special management onfarm and requiring specialized off-farm techniques.In the table below the risk of transmission of eight important pests and diseases is estimated for the most common multiplication methods. This estimate of risk is valid only if certain key practices are employed with skill and care for each method. The key practices for each method are described in Section 7 in the following pages. Please pay close attention to the key practices as you plan the preparation or purchase of planting material. Of course, if any of these pests and diseases are not present in your areas, for example BBTV in Latin America, the risk is reduced, unless you are bringing planting material from another continent or a another zone with the pest or disease present.(*) If pest or disease is not present in region or country, then risk declines substantially.capitulo 7: ¿Cuáles son las prácticas clave de multiplicación para cada método que garanticen la calidad del material de siembra? capitulo 7: ¿Cuáles son las prácticas clave de multiplicación para cada método que garanticen la calidad del material de siembra?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaChapter 7: What are the key multiplication practices from each method to guarantee quality?Farmers are keen to use low cost techniques whenever possible in their crop production. However, using poor quality planting material contaminated with pests and diseases may have a negative impact on both yields and on profits. Plantlets from specialized laboratories are often sold as both clean and of high genetic quality. However, this so-called modern technology does not reduce the risk of producing non-compliant variants nor the risk of contamination by viral and bacterial diseases, if certain procedures are not followed. Growers need to know the key practices for alternative multiplication methods to make good choices in their production planning. Here we do not describe all the details for multiplying plant material. We identify the key or most important practices that influence the quality of planting material.Key practices for selecting healthy superior mother plants:1) extract suckers only from fields free of symptoms of BBTV, BBrMV, BSV and CMV ; 2) extract suckers only from fields free of bacterial and fungal wilts; 3) extract suckers only from fields with a minimal presence of nematodes and weevils; 4) throughout the year, mark plants with big bunches as a source of suckers when the bunch is harvested. Once the harvest is past, it may be difficult to recognize these superior productive plants; 5) throughout the year, mark plants with healthy, abundant leaves, firm rooting, stout trunk and below average height as a source of suckers; 6) if selecting suckers for multiplication in a tissue culture laboratory and even through propagation of axillary buds, carefully select mother plants with best the characteristics and no faults. If these elite mother plants are not well chosen, then the materials multiplied will not offer the full advantage of the high multiplication rate; 7) materials taken from mother plants for tissue culture multiplication should be quarantined and tested for the presence of viruses and bacterial wilts. DO NOTS in the selection of mother plants:1. DO NOT extract suckers from old fields or unproductive fields; 2. DO NOT select suckers from plants without observing the bunch; 3. DO NOT select suckers from fields with bacterial or fungal wilts, BBTV, BBrMV, CMV or BSV.chapteR 7: What are the key multiplication practices from each method to guarantee quality?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaKey practices for extracting and preparing suckers for direct planting:1) Use practices described in the section on selecting healthy superior mother plants; 2) select cone-shaped sword suckers that reach 1 metre in height before broad leaves are produced, although peepers and corm pieces from harvested corms or maiden corms can also be used.3) Use paring or boiling water treatment to sanitize planting material.For paring:• pare suckers in the field where they were extracted until only white flesh is showing; • discard any sucker for which much of the corm has been cut away, for which the corm has brown-black discoloration, or for which off-coloured spots or ooze are found in the stem section; • immediately move pared suckers to a new location distant from banana plantations to avoid recontamination from weevils which are attracted by the odour of freshly cut banana tissue.Acceptable planting material (DC)Preferred planting material (PC). Acceptable planting material (PC)chapteR 7: What are the key multiplication practices from each method to guarantee quality?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaWell pared sucker (PC).Weevil galleries remaining NOT acceptable (PC).Off-coloured stem section NOT acceptable (PC).Off-coloured ooze NOT acceptable (SM).chapteR 7: What are the key multiplication practices from each method to guarantee quality?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaFor treating suckers in boiling water:• select suckers with healthy white corm material, rejecting all suckers with very small corms, off-coloured stem section or ooze, or much of the corm damaged by galleries. However, complete and thorough paring is not necessary; • immerse suckers in boiling water for 30 seconds;• immediately move boiled suckers to new location distant from banana plantations to avoid recontamination from weevils.Suckers after boiling water treatment (PC). 1) use practices described in the section on selecting healthy superior mother plants; 2) use practices described in the section on extracting and preparing suckers for direct planting, including paring or boiling; 3) select field for planting which has not been planted to bananas for at least one year and which is distant from established banana fields; 4) rogue any off-type plants or plants with suspicious symptoms and do not use the field as a source of planting material if plants with symptoms of BBTV, BSV, BBrMV, bacterial wilts or Fusarium wilt are found; 5) eliminate flower before emergence (decapitation, 'false decapitation').Decapitation serves to eliminate the growing point before flower emergence and stimulate sucker formation (JC).False decapitation also serves to stimulate sucker formation by inhibiting flower emergence (OB).Suckers should be harvested as soon as they reach the minimum useful size to allow space for remaining suckers (JC). chapteR 7: What are the key multiplication practices from each method to guarantee quality?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaKey practices for growing out microcorms: 1) use practices described in the section on selecting healthy superior mother plants; 2) use practices described in the section on extracting suckers for direct planting; 3) pare suckers to a size ranging from 200-500 g and sort by size; 4) follow key practices for weaning nurseries. DO NOTS in growing out microcorms:1. DO NOT use unpared suckers; 2. DO NOT crowd plants without sorting, especially after two weeks.chapteR 7: What are the key multiplication practices from each method to guarantee quality?Key practices for propagating plants from axillary buds:1) use practices described in the section on selecting healthy superior mother plants; 2) use practices described in the section on extracting for direct planting; 3) pare suckers to a size ranging from 200-500 g to expose only white tissue; 4) strip leaves one by one to expose axillary buds at the base of leaves and cut deep X over main growing point at the centre of the stem section; 5) prepare deep bed of well moistened sawdust within humidity chamber which is partially shaded; 6) eliminate any main shoots which sprout, since these will inhibit the sprouting of axillary buds; 7) carefully remove sprouts with roots, maintaining the bulb at the base of stem intact; 8) return suckers to well moistened sawdust for additional sprouting; 9) follow key practices for weaning nursery.Suckers are first pared and then leaves are stripped one by one to expose axillary buds (TL).Suckers are placed into a bed of moistened sawdust within a high humidity chamber. The chamber should be shaded to about 50% natural sunlight (TL).Sprouts of the main shoot should be eliminated as soon as they appear, since they will inhibit the sprouting of the axillary shoots (TL).Shoots originating from axillary buds should be carefully cut away for transplant into bags in a weaning nursery (OB).The bed of sawdust should be moistened frequently. If droplets of water do not condense on the inside walls of the humidity chamber, the sawdust is too dry (GB).Suckers can be returned to the humidity chamber to stimulate additional sprouts which can also be removed (TL).chapteR 7: What are the key multiplication practices from each method to guarantee quality?Propagating quality planting material to improve plant health and crop performance: key practices for dessert banana, plantain and cooking bananaPoorly prepared suckers will produce few sprouts from axillary buds NOT acceptable CS).The growth of the main sprout will suppress growth of axillary buds NOT acceptable (CS).1. DO NOT allow the main sprout to grow undisturbed; 2. DO NOT damage axillary buds when leaf sheaths are being removed; 3. DO NOT leave excess leaf sheath covering axillary buds; 4. DO NOT allow the temperature in the humidity chamber to elevate excessively or allow the chamber to dry out.chapteR 7: What are the key multiplication practices from each method to guarantee quality?Vitroplants may perform poorly in the nursery and the field due to contamination by bacteria or fungi in the laboratory (TL).Viruses can be introduced through vitroplants if virus testing is not rigorous (MLC).Key practices for purchasing vitroplants:1) request certification that superior mother plants of the desired cultivar for the climatic conditions of the production zone were used; 2) request certification of mother plants from zone free of bacterial (Ralstonia and Xanthomonas), viral (BBTV and BBrMV) and fungal (Fusarium TR4) wilts; 3) request certification of virus testing of mother plants for BBTV, BSV, BBrMV, CMV and other viruses. For BSV in plantain AAB, IC-PCR indexing should be used; 4) request certification of vitroplants free of bacterial (especially Ralstonia and Xanthomonas) and fungal (especially Fusarium Tropical Race 4) infections; 5) request certification that a maximum of 1000 plants are generated from a single shoot tip; 6) request guarantee that off-types will not be greater than 5%. If the percentage is greater than 5%, replacement plants should be provided at no extra charge.DO NOT for purchasing vitroplants:1. DO NOT purchase vitroplants without certification of quality of mother plants, of virus testing procedures and of lack of contamination of bacteria and fungi.chapteR 7: What are the key multiplication practices from each method to guarantee quality?Key practices for growing out microcorms, plants from axillary buds and vitroplants in weaning nurseries:1) select a well drained site with easy access to clean uncontaminated water for irrigation; 2) to reduce the risk of infection of plants from nearby banana plantations, especially by insects, including ants, screening should be used and the surrounding area of 10 meters width should be kept free of any vegetation; 3) plan for a maximum shade of 50% which can be gradually reduced and then eliminated just prior to transplant; 4) prepare a clean substrate rich in organic matter and adequate nutrients for initial vigorous plant growth and free of nematodes and possible contamination with bacteria and fungi; 5) at regular intervals, eliminate off-types, plants lacking vigour and plants with disease; 6) increase the space between nursery bags as plants grow larger and leaves begin to overlap.The nursery site should be well drained with good air circulation and easy access to water (IVDB).The substrate should be free of contaminating pests and diseases, but also rich in organic matter and nutrients (LP).All off-type, unhealthy or slow-growing plants should be eliminated (QDPI). The use of locally-produced suckers for direct planting, sucker multiplication plots, microcorms or plants from axillary buds represents a very high risk of multiplication of certain diseases which may be present. The only options available depend on in vitro multiplication with clean shoot tips thoroughly indexed free of virus. The initial emphasis in these multiplication programmes should be on diseasefree material, but over a period of 5-10 years, the selection process should also include the identification of superior clones with a high and uniform production potential.Option 1 (see table 1 next page) is more applicable where vitroplants are inexpensive and the re-infection rate is high. This approach is used in Taiwan under threat from Fusarium wilt, and in the Philippines where BBTV pressure is very high. Under such conditions the use of sucker multiplication plots represents a high risk of re-infection before plants from axillary buds can be implemented.Option 2 (see table 1 next page) is demanding in terms of the protective measures during several stages, but may be applicable where the risk of re-infection is lower, where tissue culture plants are more expensive or lab facilities are limited and when the cultivar is primarily of local interest. Alternative programmes when serious diseases requiring off-farm methods are absentIn regions where diseases often subject to quarantine are absent, there are numerous options to produce clean planting material. The primary challenge is to reduce nematodes in planting material as well as other diseases mentioned earlier. The major challenge in such regions is developing superior clones with a high and uniform production potential. The use of in vitro multiplication is not illustrated among the options below, but may be very effective once superior clones have been identified.Options 3 and 4 are most applicable when there are already abundant areas of the desired cultivar (Table 2). When the source of mother plants is more limited, then a longer time period is required as shown in Options 5 and 6 (Table 3). When very few suckers are available to multiplication, an even longer time period is required to reach the target of 50,000 plants as shown in Options 7 and 8 (Table 4). When a disease such as BBTV is present and spreading, the challenges are numerous simply to avoid catastrophic losses. BBTV is present is Australia, Philippines and the Democratic Republic of Congo, countries with widely varying infrastructure and human resources to implement solutions. Australia is currently trying to eradicate BBTV after many decades of limiting its impact and spread.Philippines is currently developing a clean, BBTV-free seed programme for important local market cultivars based on a highly efficient tissue culture sector which serves primarily the export banana farms. An earlier attempt to provide virus-free planting material through university tissue culture labs had limited impact, but universities are key players in training technical staff and farmers. In DR Congo BBTV has spread across the country into the remote fields of small farmers over several decades, during which time public and private sector services were collapsing due to civil strife. Australia and Philippines have different expected outcomes with different information delivery to different stakeholders. DR Congo is only beginning to mobilize public sector agencies to discuss the need for action.To address improved planting materials for farmers, public and private sectors in Australia and Philippines have key services, materials and human resources such as virus testing laboratories, private tissue culture companies, virologists and field plant quarantine officers. DR Congo, on the other hand, faces two challenges: to determine the additional services, materials and human resources that are needed to provide BBTV-free planting material and then to implement a strategy beginning in zones with the lowest cost and highest likelihood of success.This illustrated guide has drawn on decades of research and development on more efficient and effective planting materials. However, the implementation of effective programmes which facilitate farmer use of higher quality planting material still offers a considerable development challenge beyond the details and key practices of the different multiplication methods."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0897677895.json b/main/part_2/0897677895.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55a699483bacf699c8cf76d1143707adc80d876c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0897677895.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5989c0d03245cafa9f7206e05db5715d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/0826dfce-3630-44f5-8ade-ece9c47cbc2e/content","id":"1103280153"},"keywords":["Drought resistance","Cereals","Maize","Plant production","Food security","Food supply","Community involvement FO1","F30 ican film","gmbh","Switzerland"],"sieverID":"dd410846-f9f9-4ec2-8ad3-8c408229bb96","content":"The Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) Project is jointly being implemented by CIMMYT and the IITA, and is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Howard G. Buffet Foundation. The project is part of a broad partnership also involving national agricultural research and extension systems, seed companies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community-based organizations (CBOs), and advanced research institutes, known as the Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) Initiative. Its activities build on longer-term support by other donors, including the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), and the Eiselen Foundation. The project aims to develop and disseminate drought tolerant, high-yielding, locally-adapted maize varieties and to reach 30-40 million people in sub-Saharan Africa with these varieties in 10 years.While maize is the most important agricultural commodity in Kenya, its production often falls below requirements whenever there is drought. The main aim of the Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) project is to address such shortfalls in maize production through developing and disseminating drought tolerant cultivars.The DTMA Project (http://dtma.cimmyt.org) is jointly being implemented by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), and is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Howard G. Buffet Foundation. The project is part of a broad partnership also involving national agricultural research and extension systems, seed companies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community-based organizations (CBOs), and advanced research institutes, known as the Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) Initiative. Its activities build on longer-term support by other donors, including the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), and the Eiselen Foundation. The project aims to develop and disseminate drought tolerant, high-yielding, locally-adapted maize varieties and to reach 30-40 million people in sub-Saharan Africa with these varieties within 10 years.Community surveys were undertaken for this project in Machakos and Makueni districts to provide baseline socioeconomic information. Objectives of this survey were to: acquire information to facilitate the analysis of the socioeconomic and bio-physical environment in which the DTMA varieties would be adopted and their performance evaluated; to provide the context for the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of household surveys; and to integrate community level information with production and price data, and information from other sources, to facilitate the characterization of household livelihoods, cropping systems, farm produce and inputs markets, and to gain insights into the constraints faced and available opportunities.The findings of the community survey portrayed two communities faced with shrinking land holding sizes and degradation of the natural resource base through loss of nutrients and erosion of soil, biodiversity and grazing resources. The communities face challenges including declining amounts of seasonal rainfall, increased frequencies of drought and increased risk of crop failure. While improvements in the road transport infrastructure were identified, along with improvement in the reach and densities of farm inputs distribution, the majority of smallholders have not benefited from this due to high access costs. Farm productivity in general, and maize productivity, in particular, are declining. This decline in productivity of maize was attributed to factors such as continued reliance on low-yielding and risk-prone varieties, lack of extension services and unavailability of credit. The general assessment was that more than two-thirds of households were food insecure most of the year. Despite marked improvements in the number and quality of service providers now available in the area, health status was considered to have deteriorated over the previous 10 years. The level of poverty (already higher than the national average) was considered to be increasing.The findings of this survey indicate that attributes of DTM varieties such higher yields, better drought tolerance and shorter maturity periods relative to the currently marketed varieties currently in the market, are likely to lead to their more widespread adoption. The survey identified a fairly dense network of farm inputs suppliers which would facilitate seed distribution. Seed distribution is also likely to benefit from the network of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) whose typical activity portfolios include aspects of agricultural development. Given the high levels of poverty in both Machakos and Makueni districts, widespread adoption of DTMA varieties is unlikely to occur in the absence of policies which address provision of incentives to farm inputs traders. Another reason for poor adoption is the difficulty that farmers face in accessing cash, as well as the aversion to risk of losing their investment in the maize crops in case of drought. The study identified a number of financial institutions and an existing cooperative movement in the two areas. At the time of the survey, lending for agricultural purposes was a low priority for these institutions. Another key finding was that adoption of DTMA varieties is likely to result in greater empowerment of women.Although the qualitative methods employed for this study were strong, in interpreting the findings, conclusions and policy recommendations proposed by the authors, the reader should remember that limitations to the approach exist. Carefully designed adoption studies to facilitate statistical or econometric modeling of causeeffect relationships among household characteristics, variety attributes, institutional factors, drought risk and the likelihood of adoption must be implemented to complement the findings of this survey. Taken together, results of such surveys can greatly aid in establishing variety development objectives, evaluation or adaptation experiments and, most of all, in designing strategies to make the varieties available to the majority of farmers. Kenya has a population of 28,241,000 (GoK 2007a.) and a land surface area of 582,646 km 2 . The country has five main agro-ecological regions: a narrow, humid to sub-humid coastal strip; bush-covered plains in the interior; high-lying scrublands in the northwest; fertile grasslands and highland forests in the south-west; and the Great Rift Valley in the west, where some of the country's highest mountains, including Mount Kenya (5,199 m) are situated, as well as Lake Turkana. Except for the temperate highlands, the climate is hot and dry. Coffee, tea, petroleum products, cereals, and fresh vegetables, fruits, and flowers are the chief exports. Large numbers of cattle are pastured in the grasslands. Industry, which is expanding, includes oil refining, food processing, and the manufacture of consumer goods, cement, and textiles. Agriculture, dominated by smallholder farming, directly contributes 26-27% of Kenya's gross domestic product (GDP). The range of agricultural commodities includes cereals and pulse crops, horticulture and floriculture, roots and tuber crops, industrial crops, dairy production and ranching (Jaetzold and Schmidt 1983). The staple commodities are maize and sorghum (cereals), beans, cowpeas and pigeon peas (pulses), potatoes and cassava, meat, milk and an assortment of fruits and vegetables.The main tenets of the agricultural policy are food security, income generation, employment creation and poverty alleviation. While maize is the most important agricultural commodity, production often falls below requirements due to drought, necessitating massive imports. This project proposes to reach a greater number of poor farmers in SSA with open-pollinated varieties (OPVs) and hybrids that have higher drought tolerance thus reducing farmers' vulnerability, increasing their food security and improving their livelihoods in drought years.The community surveys developed in Kenya for this project were undertaken in the Machakos and Makueni districts. Qualitative and quantitative information at district and community level was collected to characterize the maize production systems facing drought risk. The information captured:Drought risk experiences, and perceptions and attitudes, • Livelihoods diversity and strategies for coping with drought and related institutional factors, • Adoption, non-adoption, and dis-adoption of improved maize varieties since 1997, • Farmer evaluation of traditional and improved maize varieties in relation to drought (e.g. yield • increments; food security: reduction in hunger months; cash income; etc.), andMaize production constraints, including improved maize seed suppliers operating in the area. •The study was guided by three main objectives: Acquiring information (not obtainable through household surveys at reasonable cost) to facilitate a • qualitative analysis of the socio-economic and bio-physical environment in which the DTMA varieties are likely to be adopted.Providing the context for design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of household survey results and a • basis for triangulating the community level information with data from the planned household survey.Integrating community level information with production and price data, and information from other • sources to facilitate characterization of household livelihoods, cropping systems, farm produce and inputs markets, and to gain valuable insights into constraints faced and available opportunities.Community focal group discussions (FGDs), key informant interviews (KI) and a variety of secondary sources uncovered detailed information about the agricultural production systems within Machakos and Makueni districts where maize is the main food and cash crop. The community survey also yielded information for use in characterizing drought risk, a significant feature of farming in the two districts. The areas of focus of the DTMA survey were Kangundo Division in Machakos District and Kaiti Division in Makueni District. 1Kangundo and Kaiti divisions where the community surveys took place now fall within the newly established Kangundo and Makueni Districts respectively. Since the new districts have yet to establish key administrative, institutional and functional structures of their own, district-level insights from key informants and secondary sources reported in this document refer to Machakos and Makueni districts before they were sub-divided, unless otherwise stated. Table 1 shows the study sites, their global positioning system (GPS) coordinates and the number and gender of participants. A total of 12 focal group discussion (FGD) sessions were conducted-five in Machakos District and seven in Makueni District, as shown in Table 1. The sites were selected so as to capture the range of agro-ecological variation that is experienced at the community level. In both districts, participation was drawn from farmers, farm input suppliers, extension service providers, students and community leaders. A fair representation by gender of participant was achieved (30% and 35% of participants in Machakos and Makueni, respectively, were women). Checklists were used to guide discussions at the FGD and KI interviews. Both exercises took place between June and August 2007. It is widely believed that much of the farm land in Machakos and Makueni districts is prone to frequent droughts (Tiffen et al. 1994). Government statistics (e.g., GoK 2005) indicate that during periods of drought, shortfalls in maize production occur. As maize is the main staple in the region, a sizeable proportion of farm households encounter severe hardships as they strive to meet their food requirements following drought episodes. In attempting to provide a sustainable solution to this problem, 78 maize varieties have been released between 1964 and 2004. Most of these varieties were developed by the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) and more recently, universities, and private and public sector seed companies. Out of these 78 varieties, about 20 were bred for the growing conditions found in the dry mid-altitude (DM) and dry transitional (DT) agro-ecological zones.A drought resistant variety, Katumani Composite B (KCB) was released in 1968, and this was followed by release of Dryland Composite 1 (DLC1) in 1989. A number of other varieties have been developed since, mostly, by the CIMMYT/KARI Africa Maize Stress (AMS) project. To complement the plant breeders' effort, KARI has developed farmer recommendations for fertilizer use, weed management, and pest and disease control for these varieties. While the Kenyan farmer in wetter areas has benefited from significant yield improvement, households in drought-prone areas have not. The DTMA project intends to develop varieties which should perform well even under drought conditions.Machakos District stretches from latitudes 0º45´S to 1º31´S and from longitudes 36º45´E and 37º45´E; its total area was 6,281 km 2 with a population of 906,644 persons according to the 1999 Population and Housing Census (GoK 2007a). The district has a high population growth rate since it is preferred by large families, and has high urbanization rates in Machakos, Athi River, Tala-Kangundo, Matuu, and Masii towns. There is an increased rate of settlement in areas of marginal agricultural potential (GoK 2002a;GoK 2007a), and this trend is widely reported to have characterized the pattern of settlement in the two districts for more than a century (O'Leary 1975;Tiffen et al. 1994).Makueni District stretches from latitude 1º35´S to 3º01´S and from longitude 37º10´E to 38º30´E. The district had a total area of 7,965.8 km 2 , out of which 474.1 km 2 and 724.3 km 2 formed the fabulous Tsavo West National Park and Chyulu Hills Game Reserve, respectively. The district had 771,545 persons according to the 1999 Population and Housing Census (GoK 2007a). There are several upcoming market centers such as Wote, Kathonzweni, Matiliku, Kibwezi, Mtito Andei, Makindu and Mukuyuni, which offer investment and employment opportunities for the residents of the district (GoK 2002b). While the highest concentration of the population is in the hilly areas, excess numbers are extending the settlement margin further into land of low to very low agricultural potential. By 2001, there were 30,000 declared squatters in the district (GoK 2002b).Administratively, Kenya is divided into eight provinces (Nairobi, Central, Eastern, Coast, Rift Valley, Nyanza, Western and North Eastern) for the purpose of co-ordination of government functions. Each province is divided into several districts, and each district is further divided into one or more administrative divisions. Within this hierarchy, one or more locations may comprise a division. Each location is further divided into one or more sub-locations. At the base of this pyramid is the village, also referred to as area or sub-unit. Operationally, the hierarchy is managed by the Provincial Administration, the field arm of the Office of the President. Machakos and Makueni districts fall within Eastern Province. While the two districts are populated predominantly by the Kamba community, some of the other 41 communities which make up Kenya's population, notably, the Kikuyu and Luo, are represented in varying degrees.Machakos District was divided into 12 divisions, 62 locations and 225 sub-locations. The district had six parliamentary constituencies and five local authorities with a total of 51 electoral wards. Each constituency was represented by a Member of Parliament. At the time of the study, the district had 186,297 households averaging 4.9 persons. Makueni District had 17 administrative divisions, 63 locations and 187 sub-locations. The district had five parliamentary constituencies and 69 electoral wards for local authorities. There were 144,320 households, averaging six persons.The centre of Machakos and the north of Makueni mainly consist of hills and small plateaus rising between 1,800-2,100 meters above sea level (masl). Machakos District is surrounded by a large plateau that rises to about 1,700 masl in the west and slopes to 700 masl in the south east. The mean elevation is, however, 1,357 masl in Machakos and 1,047 masl in Makueni. This undulating plain is broken by isolated mountains in the north-west, the volcanic out-flow of the Yatta Plateau in the east and Chyulu Hills in the south-east. Figure 2 shows the typical layout of the landscape. Total annual precipitation ranges from 500-1,300 mm/year, or 100-450 mm/ short rainy seasons and 80-530 mm/long rainy season.The major land formations in Makueni District include the volcanic Chyulu Hills in the south and in the north, Mbooni and Kilungu Hills which rise to 1,900 masl. Apart from the Chyulu Hills, the south of the district is largely a low-lying grassland (averaging 600 masl) which receives little rain but has potential for ranching. Athi River (and its tributaries, i.e., Kambu, Kiboko and Mtito Andei) form the major drainage system for the two districts. Aspects of elevation and precipitation for both Makueni and Machakos districts are highlighted in Table 2. Source: Jones (1988) database cited in Corbett (1998).Rainfall distribution in the two districts occurs in two seasons-the short rainy season which typically begins during October/November and ends during January/February; and, the long rainy season which begins in March and ends during August/September (see Table 2 for annual precipitation). Other agro-ecological data are presented in Tables 3 and 4. The mean monthly temperature varies between 18°C-25°C, with the hottest months being February and October, and the coolest being July (Jaetzold et al. 2006;GoK 2005). According to information obtained from the Machakos DSDO, the entire district had a total of 11,815 groups registered between 2002 and 2005. Out of these, 1,348 were in Kangundo Division. The majority of these groups were organized around the self-help concept. In Makueni District, a cumulative 14,103 groups had been registered between 1992 and 2006. Among these, 4,045 were women groups. The Makueni DSDO indicated that only about 1,000 groups were active. It was learnt from the DSDO that groups are formed for particular purposes and dissolve after the original objective behind establishment of the group has been met. Given that the year 2007 was an election year, the DSDO anticipated a surge in the number of applications for group registration. There were nine NGOs in Machakos and 11 in Makueni. Promotion of Rural Initiatives and Development Enterprises (PRIDE), Kenya Rural Enterprise Program (K-REP), Christian Children's Fund (CCF), World Vision and Maendeleo ya Wanawake were active in both districts. Most of the NGOs (70%) active in the two districts were international; mainly involved in capacity-building and conducting field demonstrations on agricultural or farming techniques (e.g., German Agro-Action) in areas of their specialization. The functions of most of these NGOs were broadly similar. Nearly all undertook activities related to building capacities of members of households for participation in development initiatives within the communities they served. Agriculture based NGOs (e.g., German Agro-Action) were also involved in relief seed distribution and demonstration of better farming techniques. The most active NGOs in the two districts are listed in Table 7. In 2006, total membership in the various types of cooperative societies in Machakos District stood at 100,839 persons. With a share capital of KShs 1.4 billion (about US$ 20 million), the contribution of societies and unions in the economy of the district is indisputable. Naikoni Kumini (horticulture), Kambuthu Farmers Cooperative Society Ltd (coffee) and Wamunyu Farmers Cooperative Society Ltd (dairy marketing) are some of the cooperative societies that were affiliated to the giant Machakos District Cooperative Union. Savings and credit cooperative societies (SACCOs), however, had the largest share of membership. The number of SACCOs was rising while that of coffee-based societies was declining, perhaps because of rising costs of production coupled with unstable prices within the coffee industry. Many societies and unions exhibited low levels of activity but the Ministry of Cooperative Development was making efforts to eliminate the major constraints to increased productivity of the cooperative movement.There were 20 cooperatives in Makueni District, distributed as follows: seven dairy; three coffee; one beekeeping; seven horticulture; one multi-purpose and one SACCO. Cooperative societies tended to focus on the main income-generating activities in the district, such as dairy, coffee and horticulture. Development of the maize enterprise did not appear to be benefiting much from the cooperative movement. There were, however, a few cases in which fertilizer and maize seed were offered to cooperative society members as in-kind credit. The Swedish Cooperative Centre (dealing with capacity-building and market linkage in dairy, cereals, and horticulture and cotton sectors) was the one of the most important cooperative unions in Makueni District.Some indicators of the quality of life and welfare indicators were considered in depth at the FGDs. Between 1997 and 2006, the cost of farm inputs rose despite falling prices for farm produce and reduced access to output markets, resulting in lower household income. At the household level, health problems have increased despite increased numbers of health facilities. Although the number (and quality) of health service providers has risen over the years, only the well-off who have the means to pay for these services have benefited. High levels of poverty in the area have effectively put these services out of reach for the majority of households. Over the same period, the frequency, incidence and severity of droughts increased, resulting in further poverty in the community.Machakos had 59% of residents generally classified as poor, while Makueni District had poverty rate of 73.5%, with the overall poverty level for the same year being 58.6%. Migration to towns in search of employment or business and trade opportunities had increased.Distribution of health facilities in Eastern Province in which Machakos and Makueni fall, rose from 308 in 1990 to 804 in 1999. The bed-and-cot capacity in the hospitals rose by 41%, from 4,769 to 6,736 (Mwabu et al. 2002).While the assessments at the FGDs were that the state of health is not improving, key informants and secondary sources indicated that the two districts have a fairly dense network of health facilities. In 2006, Machakos District had 274 facilities and out of these, 53 were in Kangundo Division. Most of these facilities were provided and operated by private investors or religious organizations. Public sector facilities typically offer services at a lower cost especially in the sparsely populated but impoverished remote areas. However, according to the District Medical Officers of Health (DMOH) of Machakos and Makueni, constraints on their budgets have led to some of the facilities in the outlying areas not being operational. Focal group discussions (60%) revealed that access to quality health care services has declined despite increased numbers of such facilities. This view is consistent with the Kenya National Human Development Report (KNHDR 2006) which states that many people had poor access to qualified doctors in Machakos (81%) and Makueni (55%).The FGDs expressed satisfaction with the state of nutrition, except child nutrition in both districts-the proportion of underweight children below 5 years was 24% in Machakos and 16.9% in Makueni. The proportion of people expected to survive beyond age 40 was marginally higher (34% in Machakos and also 34% in Makueni) than that of Kenya (33%) (KNHDR 2006).In the 10 health facilities where 1,166 people were tested for HIV/AIDS, prevalence was higher for females (13%) than for their male counterparts (6%). Mwabu et al. (2002) estimated the prevalence rates for Makueni and Machakos for 2000 at 12.4% in each of the districts.In Makueni, the major market centers are Wote, Kathonzweni, Mukuyuni, Kola, Nunguni, Emali, Kambu, Mtito Andei, Makindu, Kalawa and Tawa. In Machakos, some of the major market centers are Machakos, Athi River, Tala-Kangundo, Masii, Mwala and Matuu. Both districts have a fairly well-distributed network of farm inputs suppliers. There were 75 farm input distribution points spread among 15 market centers in Makueni District, serving 144,320 households. Farm produce marketing is generally undertaken by individual smallholders, either at the farm gate or at the nearest market centre. Most of the FGDs indicated that the farm inputs had become more accessible but were expensive. In a few cases, long distances to the input markets (upto 68 km in Machakos and 117 km in Makueni) were reported. Not surprisingly, however, the FGDs were more concerned about high prices than the distances to supply points as constraints to farm input acquisition. As noted by O' Leary (1975), for instance, members of the Machakos and Makueni communities have a long tradition as long distance travelers in the East Africa region.Low levels of investment in human capital development are widely considered to be a major impediment to economic growth and eradication of poverty in sub-Saharan Africa (Kabubo-Mariara 2007). Placed at 62% in Makueni and 64% in Machakos, compared to 69% in Kenya, the two districts appear to have low literacy levels (KNHDR 2006). Taking primary school enrolment as an indicator of community access to education, both districts had rising trends in enrolment between 1997 and 2005. In Machakos, enrolment rose from 223,366 to 273,593 pupils while that of Makueni rose from 203,127 to 255,275 pupils during the same period (GoK 2006, MoE unpublished data). Following the introduction of free primary education in the country in 2003, about 1.5 million children joined primary school nationally. However, there were still many children of school-going age who were out of school. The gross enrolment rate for 2003 was 104% while the net enrolment was estimated at 77% (Vos et al. 2004). In a recent analysis, Kabubo-Mariara ( 2007) identified several factors influencing school enrolment: boys are more likely to be enrolled in school than girls; the more educated the parents are, the more likely is the enrolment of a child in school; and mother's employment is an important determinant of enrolment.The government has been establishing measures such as the National Poverty Eradication Plan (NPEP) expected to be implemented over the period 1999-2015. The NPEP is tied to the new budgeting system, the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF). Three types of poverty are explicitly recognized in government documents (GoK 2002a, b), i.e., food poverty, absolute poverty and hard core poverty. Households whose food expenditure falls short of what is needed to purchase sufficient grain to supply FAO/WHO recommended intake of 2,250 calories per head per day are termed as food poor. The total expenditure of poor people is less than the minimum basic needs, which is estimated at KShs 1,239 in Kenya. The hard core poor cannot afford to pay for the minimum recommended calories even if they spend all their income on food. The proportion of overall poor persons in 1997 in Machakos and Makueni districts was estimated at 59% and 73.5%, respectively. By 2002, these proportions had risen to 82.7% (an increase of about 6%) and 62.9% (3.9% increase) in Makueni and Machakos districts respectively (Mwabu et al. 2002;Manda et al. 2001;GoK 2007a).Machakos District has three types of roads-bitumen (408.8 km); earth (709.4 km); and gravel (658.5 km). Over 1,400 households and 35 enterprises are connected to the mains electricity supply, while 1% of rural homes use solar power. At least 2010 households and 1,400 enterprises are connected to the land-line telephone service and there are 214 public telephone booths. Mobile telephone services are widely available throughout the district.Makueni District is relatively well-endowed with transport and communications infrastructure. The road network comprises 254 km bitumen road, 551 km of roads paved with gravel, 760 km of earth roads and 4500 km of other road types. This road network supports transport between major population centers and the rest of the country by motor vehicle. Within the district, travel or transportation by local taxi (matatu) and other forms of vehicular transportation is common. Most parts of the district are accessible by lorry/pickup truck, bicycle and where the tsetse fly 4 menace is not pronounced, donkey or ox-cart. In addition, 225 km of railroad traverse the district and there are four airstrips. Only 950 households in Makueni District have their electricity supply connected to the national grid. All the 17 divisions had mobile telephone coverage by one or two service providers (Safaricom and Zain [Celtel]) but within each division, reliability of the network signal is variable. At least 16 of the trading centers had working landline telephone services.About 85,000 ha and 4,000 ha were planted with maize and sorghum, respectively, in Machakos District (GoK 2005). In addition, there were 12,000 ha of beans, 4,000 ha of cowpeas 36,000 ha of pigeon peas, 1,500 ha of cassava, 2,000 ha of sweet potatoes and 3,500 ha of arrow roots. Corresponding acreages for Makueni District for 2006 were 46,955 ha (maize), 6,764 ha (sorghum), 19,130 ha (beans), 26,711 ha (cowpeas) and 21,199 ha of pigeon peas. At a mere 1,049 ha, cassava was a relatively minor subsistence crop. The range of crops identified at the FGDs is listed in Table 8. Typically, fields are intercropped (Figure 3). One field may have up to 10 different crops at any one time. Maize, however, was the main staple food crop, usually consumed in combination either with beans, cowpeas or pigeon peas, in varying proportions. Coffee and horticultural commodities were the major cash crops.FGDs indicated that only small amounts of maize, beans, cowpeas and pigeon peas are sold when surpluses were obtained. FGD participants had difficulties in discussing their relative profitability, perhaps because the quantities involved were small and did not enter market transactions. Profitability and \"risky crop\" assessments are shown in Table 8. Although stockists would list as many as 20 improved varieties of crop (Bett et al. 2006), farmers at the FGDs mentioned only seven (six in Makueni district). As shown in Table 8, the pace of adoption of improved varieties has been slow. Dis-adoption rates (as declared at the FGDs) of established varieties such as DLC1 and KCB were high. Dis-adption rates for local varieties were low though distinct.Adoption rates for improved varieties ranged between 6% for H513 and 51% for Pioneer in Machakos District; and, between 2% for DK8031 and 7% for Pioneer in Makueni District. The reasons for low rates of adoption were that the varieties had only been introduced recently, and were being evaluated, and that seed price was very high. Another reason was that some of the new varieties have not addressed the main concerns of farmers such as risks. FGDs identified production risk as affecting maize, beans, and pigeon peas. Farmers who grew maize and other varieties would face price and marketing risk. Farm households in the two districts consume a significant proportion of Kenya's maize crop, and attempt to produce enough to meet their own requirements and some surplus for sale each season with varying degrees of success. District level statistics show that mean acreage 1997-2005 was 147,000 ha for Machakos and 81,200 ha for Makueni. Over the same period, mean yields were 488 kg/ha for Machakos and 405 kg/ha for Makueni. These low average yields reflect near crop failure seasons (long rains [LR] 1998;LR 1999;LR 2000;LR 2004 and short rains [SR] 2005) when yields ranged from 0-75 kg/ha.Figure 4 illustrates the types of maize crops grown in the area during July/August 2007. The top left picture shows a drought stressed crop near Wote, the Makueni district center. The top right picture shows a more typical maize field sown to a local variety. In this instance, neither spacing nor fertilizer recommendations were followed. The District Agricultural Officers (DAO) in the two districts estimated that about 55-65% of the farmers follow this practice, and that grain yield obtainable on such fields would be about 300-700 kg/ha, depending on the season. The picture on the bottom left of Figure 4 illustrates a local variety crop that was planted with no attention to spacing, weeding and fertilizer recommendations during a season with good rainfall and no pest or disease outbreak. Only about 100-200 kg/ha is expected from such crop management, estimated to be practiced by 5-10% of the farmers in the two districts. The picture on the bottom right shows performance of a crop sown to Duma 41 hybrid, in a good season, with most of the agronomic recommendations followed. The DAOs estimated that grain yields of up to 4 tons/ha plus another 4 tons/ha of stover for animal feed will be harvested.The FGDs regarding the varieties grown, production constraints yield and price attributes for maize are presented in Table 9. Six varieties were identified for Machakos and eight for Makueni. Duma and Pannar varieties were comparatively new, while the Dryland (DH) and Pioneer hybrids have been grown in the area for more than five years. However, as Bett et al. (2006) have shown, over 20 maize varieties were kept by seed stockists in Machakos and Makueni. Duma series and PHB 3253 were ranked as the fastest selling varieties by the stockists. It was found that PHB 3253 was the most common maize variety grown in both Machakos and Makueni districts. The average yields of local varieties calculated from all FGD averages ranged from 590 to 980 kg/ha, and 851-1,202 kg/ha for improved maize varieties. Maize prices reported in government statistics ranged between KShs 5 and 10 per kg.Subjective assessment of the frequency of occurrence of drought in the two areas at \"one out of eight seasons\" was largely consistent with published sources, e.g., GoK (2001); Downing et al. (1989) and Barrow and Mogaka (2007). The 1972-2006 period saw at least 10 incidences of drought, with varying in severity and consequences in Kenya. . Incidences of plant pest and disease attack were reported to occur at a frequency of once in four years.Strategies to cope with the effects of drought included men migrating in search of employment especially in the construction, farm labor, and hotels industries. Women partake in informal trading e.g., selling vegetables and second-hand clothes. All the shocks identified were considered to affect maize production. More than 80% of the focus groups said the business of farming has become more difficult and risky over the past 10 years. Figure 5 illustrates the use of maize in the local livestock industry. The photo to the left shows livestock grazing in a maize field in which the farmer has lost all hope of getting substantial grain due to drought in July 2007. Maize stover is often harvested and carefully stored for either normal dry season feeding or during feed shortages caused by drought as illustrated in the picture on the left (Figure 5). They cited reasons such as inaccessible extension services, 5 high cost of inputs (such as seed and fertilizer), financial constraints, unaffordable transport to the market, reduced rainfall, reduced farm size, and invasion by pests. Those who said farming has become less difficult cited reasons such as being able to access a wide range of varieties and inputs. Growing maize has also become more difficult, as mentioned by majority of the FGDs. Reasons given were inaccessible credit, lack of output market, unpredictable climate, reduced farm size, financial constraints, and occupation of the farm by other crops. Those who said growing maize has become less difficult/risky cited the availability of many modern seed varieties in the market and easy access to output market. However, many farmers in the FGDs expressed their dismay with emergence of fake seed in the market; a finding reported by Bett et al. (2006). This has impacted negatively on the adoption trend of improved varieties in the area.Men and women are users and managers of resources but with different roles, responsibilities and opportunities in accessing and making better use of those resources at the household and community levels (Rocheleau et al. 1995). Gender is central to positioning both men and women vis-à-vis institutions that determine access to land and other resources. Women control the purchase of particular crops or seeds such as bananas, cassava, pigeon peas, beans, maize, millet, vegetable seeds (particularly cabbages), tomato seeds, cow peas, sweet potatoes, fruits, pumpkin, and arrow roots. However, maize was cited as a crop for both men and women. Except for beans, vegetables and fruits, women control the income of all other crops without having to consult with their spouses.In addition, they control income from sorghum and Irish potatoes. However, women have special responsibility for all crops (Table 11). It was gathered from FGDs that some men undertake off-farm employment and participate in social activities, leaving little time for crop management. The FGDs revealed that the price of maize grain ranged between KShs 8.1-12.3/kg in Machakos and 7.3-13.9/ kg in Makueni. The price range for green maize was KShs 5-10/cob, while that for residue was higher at KShs 60-120/bundle. The weight or volume of the bundle was not specified. These are prices for the 2006/7 seasons. Nominal price changes between 1997 and 2007 ranged from KShs 5-15/kg (grain); from KShs 5-10 per cob (green) and from KShs 20-120 per bundle (residue).The stockists' retailing price for a 2-kg packet has been rising annually as shown by the price trends: KShs 249 in 2002;KShs 354 in 2003;KShs 356 in 2004;KShs 359 in 2005;and KShs 363 in 2006. However, the stockists' buying price (from distributors) did not follow any clear trend: KShs 329 in 2002;KShs 331 in 2003;KShs 323 in 2004;KShs 328 in 2005;and Although there were a number of financial institutions in both districts, only about half of the FGDs reported easy access to credit. Those who found it difficult mentioned various constraints such as lack of collateral (some did not have title deeds, especially in Makueni). In addition, they mentioned production and market risks, lack of awareness and information, reduced extension service, and lack of cash crops to help them repay the loan. In Machakos, there were five banks, 34 SACCOs and four micro-finance institutions. In Makueni, there were three micro-finance institutions, one bank and one other type of financial institution (Kenya Women Finance Trust) as reported in the respective District Development Plans for 2002-2008(GoK 2001)).According to the FGDs, there were 80-200 mutual support groups in the area. These are run by members supporting each other though cash donations and in-kind contribution. In-kind contribution typically includes labor, meeting expenses for social events such as funerals, weddings, education and purchase of household goods. Among the mutual support groups, some operated like micro finance institutions and CBOs. While most micro finance institutions did not have farming activity as their focus, some supported informal trade. In 2006, for instance, 75% of the households in some villages received credit from the micro finance institutions. The interest rate charged was on average 20% per month. Kenya Rural Enterprise Program Bank (K-REP) was one of the main lending institutions in the area whose activities were deeply rooted in the community. In comparison with other institutions, its interest rate was as low as 3% per month. Specifically, K-REP Bank through its Farmers Savings Association (FSA) outlets provided credit in-kind and cash. The requirement for K-REP credit was that beneficiaries must be members of a group. The credit provided was meant for a wide range of activities such as business, education, household goods and purchase of livestock, in addition to paying bride wealth.Among the major types of organizations in the study area, women groups are the most frequent. According to the FGDs, 20-75% of the households had at least one member belonging to one or more of these organizations. The core purpose of such organizations was the provision of mutual assistance on a revolving basis. This arrangement works in such ways that members support each other, with every member receiving the benefit(s) in turn, on a rotational basis. The assistance they provide to each other varies from group to group but the resources pooled could provide capital for an informal business. Women groups were found to be very helpful in the community. Some of the direct benefits included helping members buy household goods or pay for their children's education. Although slowly emerging, youth groups had not yet become as established in the study area as women groups had. However, as shown in Table 12, women constituted a small percentage of the members. According to members of the community, youth groups were seen as very helpful as they kept the members busy, in addition to providing them with income generation avenues such as tree nurseries and brick-making. Malefemale groups (where membership and participation is not based on gender) were a new dimension in formation of social organizations. However, it appeared that women constituted the minority (30%) in these organizations. Men-women groups were considered to be very helpful as members provided labor exchange among themselves (Table 12). Agriculture contributes about 75% of income while rural and urban self employment accounts for 15% and 8%, respectively. Crop production was the main livelihood sustaining activity in which 95% of people were involved (Table 13), including men, women and children. Other activities are construction (70%), employment in government (55%), petty trade (46%) and livestock production (30%). As indicated, petty trade was mainly done by women. Other minor activities were collection of natural products, sale of firewood and casual labor.Firewood is sold predominantly by women. All the FGDs indicated that communities or households in the study area considered themselves to be in a state of food shortage whenever rains failed or were inadequate, and when this situation led to low crop production or total failure. Shortage of staple food crops in the local grain markets was also considered an indication of famine. Some FGDs stated that whenever there was non-adoption of modern agricultural technologies, it was an indicator of food shortage. Households that suffered from hard core poverty experienced food shortages whenever there were no food donations from the government and donors. FGDs assessed the prevalence of food-insecure households in Machakos and Makueni at 67%. Members of the community devised coping strategies for times of food shortage by working off-farm, selling livestock (small animals and cattle) and receiving food donations from the government and well-wishers.Mainly due to unreliable rainfall, households in Machakos and Makueni districts experience frequent food shortages leading to perpetual reliance on food donations from the government and other donors. In 2004/5, Machakos experienced a severe food shortage, necessitating distribution of relief food on a massive scale. In four months alone (August, October, November and December), 1,620 and 1,550 tons of maize and beans, respectively, were distributed by the government in the affected divisions of Kalama, Yathui, Katangi, Masinga, Ndithini, Central and Kathinai (GoK 2005). The district had 6,996 and 1,028 tons of maize and beans, respectively, in reserve (KangundoDistrict Agricultural Extension Officer [DAEO 2005]). In Kaiti Division, the food situation was different from that of the other parts of the district as food was readily available in the market centers. However, due to the low purchasing power of some farm families in locations such as Kyuasini, Utaani, Iuani and Kivani, there was a food shortage (Kaiti DAEO 2005).In both Makueni and Machakos districts, FGDs identified changes in the state of natural resources and in the environment over the past 20 years. Most of the changes experienced have been negative such as reduced rainfall, drought, soil erosion, dwindling water sources, and bare land. These negative changes were mainly attributed to destruction of vegetation through cutting down of trees for wood and charcoal-making. Another reason for destruction of vegetative cover was to facilitate new human settlements, farming and grazing of livestock. The few positive changes experienced in some areas have been attributed to improved vegetation cover through planting exotic trees, mainly sourced from South Africa. This has led to the revamping of the water sources resulting in some streams flowing with water. Sinking of boreholes has also improved the water situation in some areas. Lack of adequately safe water is a global problem, with more than 1 billion people lacking access to safe water. KNHDR (2006) indicates that a large proportion of people in Machakos (62.1%) and Makueni (58%) do not have access to safe drinking water. These are higher percentages than the national average (42.3%) and that of Eastern Province (55.7%). Despite the fact that Kangundo and Kaiti divisions lie on hilly land, most members of the community depended on temporary wells sunk in dry river beds to access water.Machakos District has a long history of settlement mainly on account of more favorable growing conditions for crops and livestock. Makueni District, on the other hand, was settled relatively recently. The communities in the two districts have a common ethnicity and shared local institutions for managing access and use of common resources such as water and forests (Table 14). In both districts, the community forest and water resources were the two common resources whose availability seemed to be decreasing over time. The forest has only been spared total destruction through government legislation, as it is government-owned. However, community water resources are controlled by informal regulations set by members of the community themselves. All members of the community have only limited access to the forest simply for fear that they might destroy it. Due to scarcity of water, as shown in Figure 6, wells are often sunk, as shown in the second picture, and members of the community have to compete for resources. In order to access water, one often has to queue at the water points. The community survey described here has facilitated the analysis of the socio-economic and biophysical environment in which new DTMA varieties will be adopted. The study also provided the context for the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of household surveys conducted subsequently in 2008. The study integrated community level information with production and price data and information to characterize household livelihoods, cropping systems, farm production and inputs markets, and it generated insights into the constraints faced by farmers as well as opportunities available to them. These objectives were pursued through 12 focal group discussions and key informant sessions in Kangundo (Machakos) and Kaiti (Makueni) in Kenya, during June-July 2007.The findings of the community survey portrayed two communities faced with shrinking landholding sizes and degradation of the natural resource base through loss of nutrients and erosion of soil, biodiversity and grazing resources. Through FGDs, the communities in the two districts voiced their awareness of the challenges they face. These challenges included declining amounts of seasonal rainfall, increased frequencies of drought and increased risk of crop failure. While FGDs identified improvements in the road transport infrastructure as facilitating improvement in the reach and densities of farm inputs distribution, the majority of smallholders have not benefited due to high access costs. Assessment by most of the FGDs was that farm productivity in general, and maize productivity, in particular, were declining. This decline in maize productivity was attributed to factors such as continued reliance on low yielding and risk-prone varieties, lack of extension services and unavailability of credit. The general assessment was that more than two-thirds of the households were food insecure most of the year. Health status was considered to have deteriorated over the preceding 10-year period, despite the marked improvement in the number and quality of service providers now available in the area. The level of poverty (already higher than the national average) was considered to be increasing.The findings of this survey indicate that if DTMA varieties with higher yields, better drought tolerance and shorter maturity periods than the varieties currently in the market were available, adoption would likely occur.The survey identified a fairly dense network of farm input suppliers who would help facilitate seed distribution. Seed distribution is also likely to benefit from the network of NGOs (8 in Machakos and 11 in Makueni) and CBOs whose typical activity portfolios include aspects of agricultural development. Given the high levels of poverty in the two areas, however, widespread adoption of DTMA varieties is unlikely to occur in the absence of policies which address incentives to farm inputs traders on the one hand, and, on the other hand, farmers cash constraints as well as aversion to the risk of losing their investment in the maize crops, in case of drought.The study identified a number of financial institutions and also the cooperative movement in the two areas. At the time of the survey, lending for agricultural purposes was a low priority for these institutions. FGDs assessed maize production as a farm activity for which both men and women share responsibility for resource allocation as well as benefits. Widespread adoption of DTMA varieties is likely to result in greater empowerment of women.While bearing in mind the strengths of the FGD and key informant interview methods employed for this study, in interpreting the findings and conclusions proposed by the authors, the approach displays limitations. Carefully designed adoption studies to facilitate statistical or econometric modeling of cause-effect relationships among household characteristics, variety attributes, institutional factors, drought risk and the likelihood of adoption are needed to complement the findings of this survey. The results of this type of survey can aid in establishing objectives for maize variety development, evaluating or adapting experiments and, not least, designing strategies to make the varieties available to majority of farmers."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0948197028.json b/main/part_2/0948197028.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe44d5ff7f96d6d0dd24e923325dcff1e67df9be --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0948197028.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"73d06c7a706c2150ec31fb78e09cc695","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/538e3c0b-daea-4567-809d-755b031c646f/retrieve","id":"-1307978850"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"06a6ab7c-0214-4f3a-921f-d8dca418356d","content":". Evaluation of three hydrological models (forced with WATCH and EWEMBI) using annual discharge data for Amudarya and Syr Darya rivers This study examines the climate vulnerabilities of Central Asia's water, agriculture, and energy sectors at province level, using an index-based approach that quantifies their exposure, sensitivities, and adaptive capacities. As a climate exposure metric for the water and agriculture sectors the study uses projections of river discharge and agricultural productivity under RCP 2.6 and RCP 8.5, which are viewed here as 'optimistic' and 'pessimistic' climate scenarios respectively. The sensitivity indicators reflect the degree to which an affected resource is integrated into the economic activity of a province. The energy sector assessment takes into account the challenges associated with meeting projected increases in electricity demand, as well as a global imperative to achieve carbon neutrality by the middle of the century. As a universal barometer for measuring adaptive capacity for all three sectors across the provinces, the study uses proxies of their economic and institutional performances.The findings suggest that climate change will likely impact water resources in Central Asia, with varying trends across the provinces. The projections indicate that river discharge may decline in the southern river basins of the region, while it may increase in the northern river basins of the region. During the vegetation season, when water is most needed for irrigation in the southern half, river flow shifts may be more dramatic under both climatic scenarios.Central Asia's strong dependence on water resources is one of the key reasons for its high sensitivity to climate change. This dependence stems from low water productivity, particularly in the southern regions. Transboundary river systems bind downstream countries to the streamflow of upstream countries. Most parts of Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and southern Kazakhstan already face water stress, thus any further gap between water availability and demand would exacerbate water scarcity.The countries should prioritize increasing water use efficiency across the sectors as a means of reducing their sensitivity to the adverse impacts of climate change. This is especially relevant for agriculture, which is by far the largest water consumer. Given the current high level of economic reliance on water resources, promoting alternative, less water-intensive sectors of the economy could be a promising additional adaptation approach. Apart from being a general requirement in the development context, this imperative would also strengthen the structural resilience of local economies to anticipated water stress.Future variations in water resource availability may have far-reaching effects on other sectors, with agriculture being the main recipient of the respective risks. Climate change will likely have heterogenous impacts on major crops grown in the region, with some crops seeing reduced yields and others may have the potential for an increase in productivity. Nevertheless, even the potential benefits for some of those crop types would be largely inaccessible in the southern part of the region: crop productivity here will be constrained by the projected decline in water for irrigation.Overall, in many provinces the climate impacts will be magnified by the relatively higher importance of agriculture in the local economy, in terms of share of population engaged and contribution of the sector to regional GDP. Diversification of the economy and the consequent decline in the sector's relative socioeconomic importance may become other important adaptation strategies on a macro scale.The higher sensitivity to climate impacts is also determined in some subregions by excessive monocropping patterns, when agriculture in a province is dominated by one or a few crops that have either negative prospects under climate change or are water-intensive. Reducing reliance on monocropping and crop structure optimization could diminish the sensitivity of the local agricultural sector to climate change. This needs to be complemented with careful selection and alignment of crop varieties to the changing local climate conditions. The drought-resistance of crop cultivars may become one of the important criteria in cropping decisions.The transboundary nature of water resources distribution across Central Asia predisposes the countries to a high degree of interdependence and sensitivity to compound risks, when climaterelated impacts on water resources transfer the risks to other sectors. Transboundary linkages are particularly strong in south of the region, where the majority of river runoff originates in the highlands of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, while the majority of withdrawals occur in irrigated farmland in downstream Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and south Kazakhstan. While the regional coordination of transboundary water management reduces seasonal and annual water supply uncertainty for downstream provinces, it also reduces their sensitivities and increases overall capacity in the region to adapt to long-term changes in water availability.All countries in the region face a common challenge of maintaining a long-term balance of power demand and supply, given that power consumption is expected to grow by more than half of present generation levels by the middle of the century. The Paris agreement puts an additional burden of GHG emissions reduction, particularly on Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, where power generation is far more carbon-intensive. This race for power security is compounded in the majority of countries by the high-energy intensity of GDP. While the southern areas of the region are more sensitive to long-term mismatches in power supplydemand, the findings show that many provinces in Kazakhstan are equally vulnerable.High energy and carbon intensity of the Central Asian economies therefore poses risks to longterm electric power security. Improving the economic efficiency of energy use appears to be a cost-effective first step. Many provinces in the region should also prioritize development of less energy-hungry economic sectors. Nonetheless, albeit costly one, large-scale adoption of renewable energy sources appears to be an unavoidable necessity.Long-term electric power security of the countries could also substantially benefit from multiple advantages emerging from regional cooperation, in terms of the lower economic cost of electricity and a greater flexibility to curb GHG emissions. As exemplified, cooperation improves the diversity of power supplies on a regional scale, which is another important element of energy security. It could also establish favorable conditions for exploiting the yet untapped potential of renewable sources in the region, which includes the large hydropower potential in the south.The study used GNI per capita and the government effectiveness (GE) index as proxies for adaptation capacity across Central Asian countries and provinces. Because of the high costs associated with both the adaptation to and mitigation of climate change, lower-income provinces in the region will bear a disproportionate share of the economic burden. Therefore, international development finance will be necessary to strengthen the climate resilience of the Central Asian states. However, resource mobilization alone is unlikely to be sufficient for adaptation. Both the central and local governments should continue to build their capacity in designing and implementing sound sectoral policies.In 2020 the Central Asian Regional Economic Cooperation Institute (CAREC Institute) concluded a study 'Climate Insurance, Infrastructure, and Governance in the CAREC Region,' which evaluated the main climate change challenges in the CAREC region through the lens of water-energy-food nexus, economic and financial aspects, and governance. One of the deliverables of the project included a framework developed for the assessment of climate vulnerability on a regional level across the CAREC members, which was applied to estimate disparities among the countries in climate-induced water stress. This section summarizes key findings from the project's first phase and updates them with new insights about the region's interconnected water, agriculture, and energy issues in the Central Asian states-namely Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. In this way, the section outlines the main imperatives for the further development of the multisectoral vulnerability assessment in the region.Water and agriculture sectors of Central Asia in the face of climate change Central Asia is a global hotspot for long-term climate trends, having experienced a substantial increase in temperature over the last century (Haag, Jones, and Samimi, 2019). However, it is projected that the region will see more significant seasonal and geographic variations in temperature and precipitation, affecting a variety of natural and climatic factors upon which the socioeconomic systems of the region currently rely.The expected climate impacts will exacerbate the water scarcity already observable in the southern part of the CAREC region, and may intensify the intrasectoral competition over water resources in and among the Central Asian states even further. Magnified by increased water withdrawals provoked by such factors as growth of population, increasing higher irrigation water requirements, the water supply-demand imbalances will likely prevail across a larger part of the region, putting most of the CAREC states in the list of high and extremely high water stress countries in the world. Most types of agricultural activity in the region will be at the frontline of expected climate impact. CAREC Institute (2020)In particular, climate change may dramatically alter hydroclimatic conditions, whereas the water resources underpin a wide variety of economic activity throughout Central Asia. Agriculture appears as one of the most directly impacted sectors, which employs at present between 8.2 percent and 65 percent of the population (Turkmenistan versus Tajikistan) and contribute to between 5 percent and 23 percent of GDP (Kazakhstan versus Tajikistan) (ADB, 2017a). Given the extent of anticipated climate change and their greater importance to national income and employment, the water and agriculture sectors are among the most vulnerable in the CAREC region to climate change (CAREC Institute, 2020).Challenges to assure power electricity security in the long term Central Asia is endowed with abundant fossil fuel deposits, yet these reserves are distributed inequitably throughout the region. Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan are important oil and natural gas exporters, while Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan rely heavily on their hydropower potential. This gap in primary energy resources also results in a significant divergence in the energy intensity of the respective economies. Until now, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan have been among the world's top countries in terms of energy consumption per GDP, which, among other factors, also indicates low efficiency of energy use (Shadrina, 2019).Despite disparities in primary energy resources, fulfilling the ever-growing demand for electricity in a sustainable and cost-effective manner remains a shared concern for all five Central Asian countries. To a greater extent, this increase in power demand is thanks to population growth and the promotion of new manufacturing sectors, which exceeded the pace of infrastructural upgrades (ADB, 2013). Most generation capacity in the region has beyond 40 years of operation, and power transmission is characterized by comparatively high loss.Except in Kazakhstan, electricity tariffs in all the countries hardly cover generating and transmission costs, jeopardizing the sector's financial viability and impeding technical upgrades and expansion (Boute, 2019).Nonetheless, it is expected that the power demand in the region will continue to grow rapidly in the long term. The projections show that the total regional electricity production in Central Asia will have to increase by 66 percent by 2050, although this increase will not be homogenous across the region (IEA, 2021b). Climate mitigation becomes a complementary concern for Central Asian countries in terms of maintaining a long-term energy demand-supply balance. Each of the five states is a signatory to the Paris Agreement and has established national targets for carbon reduction. This implies considerable capital expenditure for power system transition, particularly in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan (ADB, 2017b), where existing power generation capacity is mostly reliant on fossil-based thermal power plants.Water-agriculture-energy nexus in Central Asia and regional cooperationDuring the Soviet era, the Central Asian nations were connected by a shared water-power system, in which water and electricity supplies from upstream states were compensated for by energy supplies from downstream states during the vegetative season. This cooperation has been largely interrupted in recent decades as countries pursued self-sufficiency strategies in water and energy, which eventually resulted in disagreements about equitable exchanges. As a result, the region's total energy trade fell by more than half during the 1990s and countries began looking for ways to export seasonal electricity surpluses rather than import them (Figure 1).Source: (KOREM, 2020; IEA, 2021b)Overall, this situation deteriorated the electricity demand-supply balance, particularly in upstream states, while jeopardizing the water security of downstream states. All prior technical studies conducted by independent parties and multilateral development organizations emphasized the critical role of regional cooperation in ensuring the water and energy security of the Central Asian states (Xenarios, Shenhav, and Abdullaev, 2017;CAREC, 2021;IEA, 2021a). Additionally, increased regional cooperation would result in lower power generation costs and avoid capital expenses for redundant power capacity, as well as giving better options for GHG emission reductions and favorable conditions for the use of intermittent renewable energy sources (World Bank, 2017;Shadrina, 2019).The benefits of regional cooperation also extend to food security aspects, as food security is not defined simply by crop self-sufficiency on a national level but rather by the ability to meet the demand for food adequately, regardless of where the supply originates from. International trade has been shown to be an important determinant of food security in countries where cropspecific farming is hampered by certain circumstances, such as meteorological conditions (Baer-Nawrocka and Sadowski, 2019). Thus, it is suggested that countries would be better off concentrating their efforts on high value added agricultural production of crops in which they have a comparative advantage owing to climatic and institutional conditions (Lombardozzi and Djanibekov, 2021), while compensating for the deficient production of other crops through international trade.Source: Simoes and Hidalgo, 2011 Central Asia is a net exporter of agricultural crops and commodities covered by the study, owing mostly to Kazakhstan's relatively significant grain production and Uzbekistan's cotton production. To a greater extent, this includes cross-border trade in wheat and wheat products, with Kazakhstan being the greatest net exporter. Additionally, trade of other crops such as maize, rice, and vegetables increased throughout the region (Figure 2).Addressing the outlined imperatives, this study aims to:• Extend the climate vulnerability assessment framework to the agricultural and energy sectors of the five Central Asian states: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan • Downscale the assessment to smaller geographic units (province level) • Account for the interconnectedness of water, agriculture, and energy issues in the region and integrate the impact of regional cooperation among the statesThe vulnerability index approach for the agriculture sector takes into account the diversity of agricultural activity in the countries (rainfed crop production versus irrigated agriculture), the climate challenges associated with these types of agricultural activity, and the varying degrees of socioeconomic dependence of a province on agriculture.Given the multifaceted nature of energy systems in the region, as well as the discrepancy in fossil fuel endowment between the Central Asian states, the vulnerability assessment of the energy sector focus on power electricity. Long-term power supply security is a shared challenge for all countries in Central Asia and is a primary focus of the CAREC program as well as other multilateral development organizations engaged in the region.The study employed the methodological approach based on the IPCC framework for assessing climate vulnerability. Accordingly, vulnerability is defined as the degree to which a system is susceptible to, or unable to cope with, adverse effects of climate change, including climate variability and extremes. Vulnerability is determined by the kind, amount, and rate of climate variation to which a system is exposed, as well as the sensitivity and adaptive capacity of the system (IPCC, 2007). In broad terms, vulnerability can be expressed as a function of potential impacts, as measured by exposure and sensitivity, and a system's adaptive capacity to withstand anticipated impacts. Figure 3 illustrates the structural composition of the framework suggested for the assignment.The exposure component quantifies the characteristics and amount to which a sector is exposed to significant climatic change. For example, the water sector evaluation focuses on climate-induced water stress, with long-term predicted water supply serving as the primary indication of projected change. Agriculture's vulnerability score considers projected changes in yields of primary crops farmed in the region (wheat, cotton, maize, oil crops, and rice). The energy sector assessment encompasses challenges to meet a projected increase in power electricity demand, given the climate implications for the water and agriculture sectors as well as the stated carbon reduction targets of the Central Asian countries. This study employs projections generated from the latest hydrological and crop modeling research under the two climate scenarios, where RCP 2.6 is regarded as 'optimistic' and RCP 8.5 is considered as 'pessimistic' pathways (see Annex 2).The sensitivity component determines the degree to which a system is affected by climaterelated implications. The extent to which expected variations in wheat yields influence a country or a province depends on whether grain production accounts for a sizable portion of a province's economic activity. This can be quantified in terms of the contribution of wheat farming to regional domestic product or the proportion of the population engaged in agriculture, which we consider here as reliance indicators. In turn, dependency indicators represent the extent to which a country/province is dependent on external systems for a certain resource. For instance, the majority of water resources accessible to the downstream states originate in upstream countries, which may be quantified and factored into the vulnerability assessment using the water dependency ratio. Similarly, intensity indicators quantify the degree to which a resource is integrated into a country's/key province's economic activity. For example, energy consumption per capita or per unit of GDP serves as a proxy for sensitivity to disruptions in the power demand-supply balance. On the other hand, overall improvements in energy efficiency reduce the sensitivity to projected changes in energy supply.The adaptive capacity refers to the system's ability to adapt to the expected climate implications. For all three sectors, the study universally used the same indicators that measure economic, institutional, and human capacity to absorb adverse effects and/or capitalize on any favorable prospects. The economic capacity is represented by GNI per capita as an indicator measuring the state of development and as one of the main criteria reflecting the adaptive capacity of the Central Asian countries. Institutional and human capacity is approximated by using the GE index, which reflects the ability of the states to provide quality public services, to maintain quality civil service, and to design and implement sound policies, and the credibility of government commitment to such policies.One of the primary tasks for the projected climate vulnerability index is to provide a regionally distributed overview of vulnerability in order to account heterogeneity of its key components on smaller geographic scales. This was largely accomplished by either utilizing spatially disaggregated data or interpolating country-level estimates to province level as applicable. Thus, the majority of the key variables within the exposure and sensitivity components are estimated at province level (see Table 1). Nonetheless, certain indicators remained aggregated at national level in cases when spatial disaggregation was complicated owing to an absence of supporting data or when the indicators do not conceptually imply spatial distinctions within a country.Annex 1 and 2 provide an expanded description of the index-based methodological approach and the projections used for estimating changes in water availability and agricultural productivity in the region.The set of indicators of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity for each targeted sector are provided in Table 1. Annex 3 provides detailed information on data sources. To estimate the impact of climate change on water availability, this analysis examines the relative change in discharge of Central Asia's major rivers (Figure 4) by 2040-2069 with respect to the 1975-2005 baseline. The global hydrological projections employed by the study suggest that under RCP 2.6 the annual discharge in most considered rivers will likely remain near normal (Figure 5), with the exception of the most southern rivers Murghap and Tedzhen, which may see a decrease, and the most northern basins of Ishym and Tobol, which will likely see a slight increase. The disparity between northern and southern basins in terms of annual discharge may widen under RCP 8.5, although the wider spread of hydrological projections also implies relatively higher uncertainty. According to the RCP 8.5 projections the higher number of rivers located in the domain's southern to central regions may experience a decline in annual river flow.The projected changes in annual discharge indicated in Figure 5 would not, however, occur evenly throughout the months/seasons within a year. The projections indicate that the seasonal distribution of runoff in the majority of rivers in the region will also likely change, with peak flows shifting to earlier months. It is worth noting that irrigated agriculture is the major consumer of water in Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and southern Kazakhstan and that, in this sense, it is more important to consider water availability during the vegetation season, which typically lasts from April to September in this part of the region. The overall sensitivity to the projected changes in water supply differs significantly between Central Asian countries, owing to their varying degrees of reliance on water resources (Figure 8). With relatively fewer water-intensive sectors and generally more abundant water resources, particularly in the north, Kazakhstan has the region's lowest water withdrawal ratio. On the other hand, owing to the scale of irrigated agriculture in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, annual water withdrawals exceed the total annual renewable surface water available. This sensitivity is heightened by the fact that the most of the water resources available to Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan originate from outside these countries. Although the picture is relatively more heterogenous at province level, water intensity per unit GDP follows a similar south-north pattern (Figure 9). Water withdrawals per GRP 1 are considerably higher in most provinces in the south of the domain owing to a greater domination of water-intensive sectors and relatively lower economic output levels.Source: Based on country statistics (GRP) and estimates on total water withdrawals from WaterGAP2c modelFigure 10 illustrates the spatial distribution of relative vulnerability hotspots across provinces in Central Asia in light of expected changes in water availability and their economic reliance on water resources. As a result, the region is correspondingly susceptible in practically all provinces of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, both as a result of expected declines in seasonal water availability, as well as higher withdrawal availability and water reliance rates in these countries at present. While Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan have slightly lower vulnerability scores, they are still expected to face moderate to strong water stress as a result of their inferior adaptive capacities to deal with possible climatic hazards. The south of Kazakhstan, also located downstream of transboundary rivers, appears to be as vulnerable as the regions in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. The overall distribution of vulnerability hotspots by 2050 does not change significantly across the climate scenarios, with the southern half of the domain continuing to face considerably greater risks under both RCP 2.6 and RCP 8.5.The vulnerability component of agricultural output in Central Asia was determined using the most recent available yield predictions from the global crop modeling experiments. This comprised the yield projections for wheat, maize, and rice from Jä germeyr et al., 2021 and cotton yield projections from Jans et al., 2021 (see Annex 2). These estimates indicate that wheat yields in Central Asia may increase in the future owing to increased CO2 concentrations, while maize and rice yield expectations remain largely gloomy (Figure 11). Cotton yields may similarly improve as a result of the CO2 fertilization effect, albeit with a greater degree of uncertainty owing to the use of a single crop model. However, one important feature behind the crop yield projections is that they were determined under the assumption of no water constraints in the future. Crop production in the region can be classified into two distinct water-use zones: most of the northern part of the domain is predominantly devoted to rainfed cereal production, while the arid climate in the southern portion of the territory limits crop production to irrigation (see Figure 12). It is worth emphasizing here that the majority of southern provinces already experience water scarcity; this is far worse in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan (CAREC, 2021). As illustrated previously, climate change may magnify water scarcity in this part of the domain in the future under both scenarios. Considering the existing crop pattern across the provinces and predicted changes in water availability, future increases in agriculture productivity in the southern provinces may therefore be hampered by growing water scarcity (Figure 13). While the present crop structure in Central Asia is generally heterogenous, certain provinces in the region place an overwhelming emphasis on growing specific crops. For instance, in 2020 rice accounted for approximately 50 percent of the total cropped area in Kazakhstan's Kyzylorda province. Similarly, cotton accounted for more than 40 percent of the cropped area in Uzbekistan's Syrdaryo, Bukhara, and Khorezm provinces. For the Kyzylorda province, this reliance on monocropping threatens the local agricultural sector on two fronts: a decline in anticipated rice production and increased water scarcity. Despite some benefits of higher growth temperatures and CO2 fertilization on cotton yields, these potential gains will likely be offset by declining water availability in the majority of the provinces of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan.The exposure to expected changes in agricultural productivity by province will be either magnified or nullified by the importance of the agricultural sector to the local economy. At present in some provinces, the sector accommodates more than half of total employment and contributes to 50 percent of the GRP output (Figure 14). The share of agriculture in total employment is notably higher in most provinces of Turkmenistan, except the Balkan province The exposure component of the energy vulnerability index combines two issues that Central Asian countries face in ensuring a long-term balance between electricity supply and demand.The former is associated with predicted increases in electricity demand, whereas the latter is associated with the requirement to reduce GHG emissions as part of a country's commitment to the Paris agreement. Owing to continued population expansion and economic development, energy outlooks show that power demand in Central Asian countries by 2050 will likely increase by at least 50 percent from current levels, and possibly by almost 90 percent in Kazakhstan (Figure ). On the other hand, the countries' compliance with the global climate agreement requires that any incremental increase in generation capacity should come largely from renewable sources. While all Central Asian countries have made their climate pledges under updated INDCs for 2030, they have also noted that they consider achieving carbon neutrality by 2050-2060. The carbon neutrality target is thus employed as one of the study's underlying assumptions on the primary challenges that the countries must address.Source: IEA, 2021bAchieving long-term electricity generation while reducing the sector's carbon emissions will not be an easy feat for the states. This is especially challenging for Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, where the electricity industry at present is substantially dependent on fossil fuel combustion (Figure ). This stands in stark contrast to Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, which rely on hydropower for more than 90 percent of total electricity production and have some of the lowest GHG emissions per kWh produced in the world. Another significant aspect that predisposes the region's sensitivity to possible power demand-supply imbalances in the future is the region's relatively low economic efficiency of electricity use (Figure ). In comparison to the European Union, for example, some Central Asian states use multiples of the amount of electricity per GDP, with Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan having particularly high levels of consumption. The study used gross national income (GNI) per capita as an indicator measuring the state of the development and as one of the main criteria reflecting the adaptive capacity of the Central Asian countries. Besides that, the adaptive capacity was also approximated by using the GE index, which reflects the ability of the states to provide quality public services, to maintain quality civil service, and to design and implement sound policies, as well as the credibility of the government commitment to such policies. Figure 14 illustrates the distribution of the GE index and estimated GNI per capita in the region. With regard to the GNI per capita, there is a large disparity between the countries, with most provinces in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan having the lowest levels in the region, followed by Uzbekistan.Additionally, it is assumed that the countries can improve their energy security by maintaining an adequate structure of their power systems, which can be accomplished by diversifying their supply sources and prioritizing low-carbon generation technologies (IEA, 2020). In this context, the power diversity index was chosen as an extra element for estimating the sector-specific adaptive capacity. It assesses the diversity of primary resources employed in generation. The power diversity index demonstrates that Central Asian countries rely on a narrow spectrum of primary energy sources to meet their needs in electricity. Most of the generation in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan is based on natural gas thermal power plants. Kazakhstan has a relatively more diverse fuel mix, thanks to the availability of coal, oil-fired, and natural gas power plants. As previously stated, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan rely heavily on hydropower for the majority of their electricity, placing them at a slightly lower level in terms of the power diversity index (see Figure 19). As indicated in the introduction, the region's water resource utilization is highly transboundary, placing considerable reliance on countries located downstream of the respective river basins for the timely release of water from large hydroelectric dams upstream. These transboundary links are especially strong in the south of the region, where the majority of river runoff originates in the highlands of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, while the bulk of river withdrawals occur in Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and southern Kazakhstan. The reliance on water resources across the upstream and downstream states in the region has contrasting patterns. Owing to the absence of fossil fuel reserves, for upstream states water is the primary resource for electricity. On the other hand, water is a critical resource for crop production in downstream countries, which is only possible here through irrigation. The seasonal cycles of these two needs do not coincide (Figure 21), implying a substantial need for regional collaboration in Central Asia's water-agriculture-energy nexus.Source: adapted from KESC, 2021 (electricity demand); Conrad et al., 2013 (cotton crop water requirement) According to the underlying assumptions of the study, a strong reliance on inflowing water resources contributes to the sensitivity of the downstream states to changes in water discharge owing to climate change. However, with sufficient cooperation among governments on integrated water resource management, transboundary water dependency may become a much more negligible component. Figure 22 illustrates how vulnerability hotspots alter when the water dependency indicator is omitted from the experimental settings of the study. Because crop production in this water-stressed region is highly dependent on timely water releases from upstream systems, the agricultural sector also benefits from greater transboundary cooperation. The reduced magnitude of water availability risks, in particular, may partially alleviate constraints on agricultural productivity in impacted provinces. This is especially relevant for wheat and cotton, which (as previously shown) may have the potential for higher yields in this part of Central Asia based upon increased CO2 fertilization and an adequate supply of irrigation water. For crops that have negative prospects under increasing temperatures-such as rice, maize, and soybeans-water cooperation could help to avoid the additional risks associated with water irrigation deficits.Cooperative management over the transboundary water resources in the region entails stronger collaboration on electricity exchanges between the countries. Figure 23 illustrates disparities between electricity demand and supply in Tajikistan on a monthly scale when its hydroelectric facilities operate in a manner that benefits timely water availability for the downstream states. Joint water resource management thus implies that the upstream countries have more flexible possibilities to offset seasonal shortages and surpluses through transboundary electricity trade. Thus, cooperative water resource management presupposes that the upstream countries have the ability to compensate for their seasonal electricity shortages and surpluses via transboundary electricity exchange.Source: based on IEA, 2021aHowever, the overall benefits of regional cooperation are far greater than simply offsetting seasonal imbalances in power supply and demand, since it also results in lower power generation costs and avoids capital expenses for redundant power capacity, as well as giving better options for GHG emission reductions and favorable conditions for the use of intermittent renewable energy sources (World Bank, 2017;Shadrina, 2019). Additionally, it contributes to a higher diversity of power supplies and the primary energy sources upon which they are based (Figure 18), which is another important component of the energy security concept.Figure 18. Power diversity index in Central Asia on a country versus regional levelThis study examines the climate vulnerabilities of the water, agriculture, and energy sectors in the Central Asian provinces. Using an index-based approach, the study quantifies and juxtaposes major climate risks, corresponding socioeconomic sensitivities, and adaptive capacities for the water resources and agriculture sectors in the provinces. For the energy sector, the study examines long-term electricity security in light of rising demand and the compelling need to reduce associated GHG emissions.The findings suggest that climate change will likely alter water resources in Central Asia with contrasting trends across the provinces in the region. Although subject to relatively higher uncertainty on an annual scale, the projections used in this study indicate that river discharge may decrease in the river basins that are a part of the larger Aral Sea basin in the south of the region, whereas river discharge may increase in the north. The shifts in river flows may be more pronounced in the future under both climate scenarios during the vegetation season, when water is most needed for irrigation in the southern part. Given that most rivers in the region are subject to high interannual runoff variation, improving the early warning systems to existing variability is a good initial and win-win step towards achieving long-term resilience.Excessively high dependence on water resources is among the main reasons for high susceptibility across Central Asia to climate change impacts. This dependence is also rooted in low economic productivity of water use, especially in the southern provinces. Most provinces in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and southern Kazakhstan already suffer from high levels of water stress; therefore, any further gap between water availability and demand would have excarnating implications for water-intensive sectors. The countries should prioritize increasing water use efficiency across the sectors as a means of reducing their sensitivity to the adverse impacts of climate change. This is especially true for agriculture, which is by far the largest water consumer. Given the current high level of economic reliance on water resources, promoting alternative, less water-intensive sectors of the economy could be a promising additional adaptation approach. Apart from being a general requirement in the development context, this imperative would also strengthen the structural resilience of local economies to anticipated water stress.Projected shifts in water availability may therefore have a far-reaching consequence for other sectors, with agriculture being the major recipient of the transferred water-related risks. Climate change will likely have heterogenous impacts on the production of major crops grown in the region. Yield projections from the recent global crop modeling experiments suggest that maize, rice, and soybeans will likely see a decrease in productivity, while wheat and cotton crops may potentially benefit from the rising temperatures and higher carbon fertilization. Even so, the potential benefits for cotton and wheat would largely vanish in the southern part of the region: crop productivity here will be deteriorated by the projected decline in water for irrigation. Reducing reliance on monocropping and crop structure optimization could diminish the sensitivity of the local agricultural sector to climate change; it needs to be complemented with careful selection and aligning of crop varieties to the changing local climate conditions. The drought-resistance of crop cultivars will likely become one of the important criteria in cropping decisions.As a result, most provinces in the southern half of the region may see a decline in agricultural productivity. This would be exacerbated in certain provinces by excessive monocropping, when agriculture is dominated by one or a few crops that have either negative prospects under climate change or are water-intensive. These impacts will be magnified by the relatively higher importance of agriculture in those provinces, in terms of the share of the population engaged and the contribution of the sector to regional GDP. In this regard, the diversification of local economies and consequent decline in the sector's relative socioeconomic importance may become one of the few viable adaptation strategies in such provinces.All Central Asian countries face a common challenge of maintaining a long-term balance of power demand and supply, given that power consumption is expected to grow by more than half of present generation levels. The global climate agreement places an additional burden of carbon reduction-particularly on Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, where electricity generation is significantly more carbon-intensive. This race for power security is compounded in most countries by a high energy intensity of GDP. While the southern areas of the region are more sensitive to long-term mismatches in power supply-demand, the findings show that many provinces in Kazakhstan are equally vulnerable. Improving energy efficiency appears to be an important and cost-effective step. Many provinces in the region should also prioritize the development of less energy-hungry economic sectors. Nonetheless, although costly, the large-scale adoption of renewable energy sources is unavoidable.The study uses GNI per capita and the GE index as proxies for adaptation capacity across the Central Asian countries and provinces. As a country's vulnerability to climate change is proportional to its economic development, developing countries are generally more sensitive to negative climate change impacts than industrialized countries. Owing to the high costs associated with both the impacts of climate change and adaptation to these impacts, lowerincome provinces in the region will bear a disproportionate share of the economic burden. In addition, an appropriate institutional framework enables the preparation for and adaptation to climate change. The capacity of countries to deliver public services and establish and implement sound policies is viewed as a necessary element for improved development outcomes. All Central Asian countries, on the other hand, are characterized by relatively weaker government effectiveness, which may impede adaptation attempts.Given that many provinces in Central Asia's adaptation capacity are confined by their relatively low economic performance, international development finance will be necessary to strengthen their climate resilience in the face of climate threats. However, mobilizing resources alone is unlikely to be sufficient for adaptation success. Both central and local governments should continue to build their capacity for designing and executing effective policies.The transboundary nature of the distribution of water resources across Central Asia predisposes that the countries have a high degree of interdependence and sensitivity to compound risks when climate-related impacts on water resources transfer to the agriculture sector.Transboundary ties are particularly strong in the south of the region, where the bulk of river runoff originates in the highlands of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, while most withdrawals occur in the irrigated crop production of the downstream provinces. While regional collaboration on transboundary water management alleviates current uncertainties about water supply for downstream provinces, it also minimizes sensitivities and strengthens the adaptation capability of countries to long-term changes in river flow.The long-term electricity security of the countries can also benefit substantially from the multiple advantages emerging from regional cooperation, in terms of the lower economic cost of electricity and greater flexibility to curb GHG emissions. As exemplified, cooperation improves the diversity of power supplies on a regional scale, which is another important element of energy security. In addition, it could establish favorable conditions for exploiting the yet untapped potential of renewable sources in the region, including the great potential for hydropower in the south.This assessment used an index-based approach, to estimate vulnerability as a function of potential impacts, measured by exposure and sensitivity, and a system's adaptive capacity to withstand anticipated impacts:Vulnerability index = (exposure*sensitivity)/(adaptive capacity), where:The exposure component quantifies the sector's key challenges associated with climate change. For example, the water sector evaluation focuses on climate-induced water stress, with the long-term predicted water supply serving as the primary indication of projected change.Agriculture's vulnerability score considers projected changes in yield of primary crops farmed in the region (wheat, cotton, maize, oil crops, and rice). The energy sector assessment encompasses challenges to meet a projected increase in power electricity demand, given the climate implications for the water and agriculture sectors as well as the stated carbon reduction targets of the Central Asian countries.The sensitivity component determines the degree to which a system is affected by climaterelated implications. To what extent expected variations in wheat yields influence a country or a province depends on whether grain production accounts for a sizable portion of a province's economic activity. This can be quantified in terms of the contribution of wheat farming to regional domestic product and the proportion of the population engaged in agriculture, which we consider here as reliance indicators. In turn, dependency indicators represent the extent to which a country/province is dependent on external systems for a certain resource. For instance, most of the water resources accessible to the downstream states originate in upstream countries, which may be quantified and factored into the vulnerability assessment using the water dependency ratio. Similarly, intensity indicators quantify the degree to which a resource is integrated into a country's/key province's economic activity. As an example, energy consumption per capita or per unit of GRP serves as a proxy for sensitivity to disruptions in the power demand-supply balance. On the other hand, overall improvements in energy efficiency reduce the sensitivity to projected changes in energy supply.The adaptive capacity refers to ability to adapt to the expected climate implications. For all three sectors, the study universally uses the same indicators that measure economic, institutional, and human capacity to absorb adverse effects and/or capitalize on any favorable prospects. The economic capacity is represented by GNI per capita as an indicator measuring the state of development and as one of the main criteria reflecting adaptive capacity of the Central Asian countries. Institutional and human capacity is approximated by using the GE index, which reflects state ability to provide quality public services, to maintain quality civil service, to design and implement sound policies, and the credibility of government commitment to such policies.The following four steps illustrate the approach for estimation of vulnerability, using as an example the agriculture sector in Namangan province in Uzbekistan and the projections under the RCP 8.5 scenario:Step 1: Estimation of the province level exposure:-Estimate relative change in productivity of the four crops for spatial domain of target province from the global crop projections -Using actual crop structure in the province determine the coefficient of change in province-aggregated agriculture productivity -If a targeted province is irrigated, combine the coefficient of projected agricultural productivity with coefficient that reflects projected change in seasonal discharge  Projected change in seasonal discharge for the Namangan province = -19 percent  Projected change in agriculture productivity for the Namangan province = +16 percent (two-thirds of the total crop area in Namangan are under wheat and cotton)Step 2: Determination of the province level sensitivity and calculation of the potential impact:-Estimate share of agriculture in GRP and in total employment in a target province -If the province is in the downstream and crop production is irrigated, sensitivity indicators also include water dependency ratio -Sensitivity is determined by averaging the sensitivity indicators -Overall potential impact is a product of exposure and sensitivity coefficientsStep 3: Estimation of the adaptive capacity:-Adaptive capacity is determined by averaging a country's GE index and estimated GNI per capita in the province (normalized between 0 to 1 using max and min values across all provinces)Step 4: Calculation of the vulnerability indexThe vulnerability index is calculated by juxtaposing the resultant score of potential impacts with the adaptive capacity score:"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0951063265.json b/main/part_2/0951063265.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8ae18cdfbaa16c3a4efdee7c8cc9cdc7d93e753 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0951063265.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"28cad13b918a8e617c598a80f35a9a37","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/61bc8f1b-bff7-44b8-821d-d27dfa356ef2/content","id":"-615390493"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b78fd869-1947-42b2-93e6-c4c1efecb045","content":"Qf tl~~Qan~I~QliQ~tiQna iQ~R~a~g~Qh and E~t~naiQn PARC/CIMMYT pater No.86/6 and D.Byerlee et al. ~iggnQaing R~~~g~gh ~£iQ£iti~~fQ£ Q~gil ~~~~£~~tlgi~~in th~l£~ig~t~g Q~gt Ygll~PARC/CIMMYT paper (forthcoming).The agricultural system in North West Frontier Province has embarked on a programme to strengthen outreach activities that emphasise active participation of farmers in the development and dissemination of improved technology. From 1984, social scientists and maize scientists have conducted a number of surveys which describe and analyse farmers' maize production systems, diagnose factors limiting productivity and suggest technological improvements that will have the largest chance of success in improving productivity.l These survey results were synthesised in a workshop in Hingora in early 1985 in which a series of experiments to verify improved maize technolo~y were planned.The results presented in this paper are the direct outcome of that workshop.In the 1985 kharif season, some 27 sample trials with four treatments were planted and managed by farmers in Swat using designs and inputs provided by maize researchers. The researchers have also followed through and with the collaboration of a rural sociologist, they assessed farmers' opinions and acceptance of the maize technology after the completion of the verification trials.These \"farmer managed trials\" provided researchers a great deal of additional information about farmers' management and the performance of improved maize technology under their management.I commend the dedicated efforts of CCRI maize scientists to reach out to farmers and appreciate the active collaboration of the PARC/CIHMYT programme in these efforts. On the basis of a diagnostic survey in 19B4 and results of previous onfarm experiments, a series of twelve verification trials were planted in the Swat Valley (average altitude of 1000 m.a.s.l.) in 1985. These trials were completely managed by the farmer and compared three \"improved\" technological components, (1) the recommended variety (Azam), (2) phosphorous use and (3) early thinning (target density of 60,000 -70,000 plants/ha at three weeks after emergence), to the farmers' normal practice. The same set of trials were also cc~ducted in rainfed mountain terraces at an average altitude of 1700 m.a.s.l.These were regarded as exploratory, given the lack of prior information on the mountain areas. Three months after harvest, all cooperating farmers were i,terviewed. to obtain their assessment of trial results.-In the irrigated valley, yields were generally high o\"'~raging 5.0 t/ha even thou~h farmers' non-recommended p~dctices of broadcast planting at a high seed rate with continuous thinning throughout the season for fodder was employed. The only treatment giving a consistent and significant yield response was Azam variety which yielded 600-BOO kg/ha more than the farmers' variety. There was no overall yield response to phosphorous use or early thinning. Other factors explaining yield differences were shaftal as a previous crop (positive), grain moisture percent at harvest and lodging (negative) .Initial experiences from the rainfed mountain terraces indicate that this zone is a dtstinct recommendation domain. Compared to the irrigated valley, variability between fields and within-fields was very high, the incidence of drought, hail, insect and disease problems was much greater and farmers used quite different maize production systems. As on the plains, Azam variety outyielded the farmers' variety but suffered serious smut di'~~ase attack.There was no response to the other technological components. Other factors significantly affecting yields were early season insect attack, altitude and grain moisture percent at harvest (all negative effects) .In the irrigated valley, farmers' assessment of the yield response was generally consistent with trial results and most farmers' intended to plant Azam variety in the next cycle. However, in the mountains, farmers' assessment bore little relation to trial results, possibly because of lack of measures of land area, and high variability.Implications for further research and extension are identified, particularly the high pay offs to making good seed available to farmers.It is also concluded that farmer managed verification trials offer many advantages over traditional experimental methods in developing and verifying appropriate production recommendations for farmers. ixOn the basis of a diagnostic survey in 1984 and results of previous onfarm experiments, a series of twelve verification trials were planted in the Swat Valley (average altitude of 1000 m.a.s.l.) in 1985. These trials were completely managed by the farmer and compared three \"improved\" technological components,(1) the recommended variety (Azam) , (2) phosphorous use and (3) early thinning (target density of 60,000 -70,000 plants/ha at three weeks after emergence), to the farmers' normal practice. The same set of trials were also cc~ducted in rainfed mountain terraces at an average altitude of 1700 m.a.s.l.These were regarded as exploratory, given the lack of prior information on the mountain areas.Three months after harvest, all cooperating farmers were i,terviewed. to obtain their assessment of trial results.-In the irrigated valley, yields were generally high o\"'~raging 5.0 t/ha even thou~h farmers' non-recommended p~dctices of broadcast planting at a high seed rate with continuous thinning throughout the season for fodder was employed. The only treatment giving a consistent and significant yield response was Azam variety which yielded 600-800 kg/ha more than the farmers' variety.There was no overall yield response to phosphorous use or early thinning. Other factors explaining yield differences were shaftal as a previous crop (positive), grain moisture percent at harvest and lodging (negative) .Initial experiences from the rainfed mountain terraces indicate that this zone is a d~stinct recommendation domain. Compared to the irrigated valley, variability between fields and within-fields was very high, the incidence of drought, hail, insect and disease problems was much greater and farmers used quite different maize production systems. As on the plains, Azam variety outYielded the farmers' variety but suffered serious smut di~3ase attack.There was no response to the other technological components. Other factors significantly affecting yields were early season insect attack, altitude and grain moisture percent at harvest (all negative effects) .In the irrigated valley, farmers' assessment of the yield response was generally consistent with trial results and most farmers' intended to plant Azam variety in the next cycle. However, in the mountains, farmers' assessment bore little relation to ~rial results, possibly because of lack of measures of land area, and high variability.Implications for further research and extension are identified, particularly the high pay offs to making good seed available to farmers.It is also concluded that farmer managed verification trials offer many advantages over traditional experimental methods in developing and verifying appropriate production recommendations for farmers. In Swat, the largest maize producing district of Pakistan, extensive trials and demonstrations were laid out in farmers' fields in the Swat valley in the 19'10s. The program was again revived in 19B3 when newer varieties and additional components such as herbicide weed control were tested.In addition, in 1983 a series of farm level surveys were initiated to better define the circumstances and constraints of farmers in maize production. These surveys. conducted over a three year period, 1983-85, provided substantial new insights into farmers' management and led to a reorientation of the maize onfarm research program in the 1985 season (Stevens et al. 19B5;Byerlee and Hussain, 1986).In particular, it was recognized that improved maize technology was being tested in onfarm experiments under practices which were quite different from farmers' management. Trials were planted in lines at recommended seed rates, while Swat farmers invariably planted by the broadcast method at seed rates two to four times the recommended rate.Thinning in experiments was done at the three leaf stage while farmers began thinning much later and continued thinning up to harvest in order to provide fodder for animals. Seed, insecticide treatment and weed control by hoeing as used in onfarm experiments were also not commonly practiced by farmers.With the onfarm survey data in hand, many of these recommended practices (e.g. insecticide and line planting) were dropped from the list of priority recommendations (Stevens et al. 1985). However, the large differences between researcher and farmer management also raised doubts about how other components of the recommended package, such as variety and recommended fertilizer doses, would respond under farmer management.This situation led to the design of a set of farmer managed verification trials in which a few priority technological components were \"superimposed\" on farmer management over a relatively large number of sites.Although researchers supplied improved seed and fertilizer in the trials from planting to harvesting farmers performed all operations. Researchers observed these operations and also recorded yields in a sample of the plots at harvest time.This represents a rather radical departu~e from traditional experimental approaches used in Pakistan where researchers manage all operations and farnlers have little or no participation in the experimental plots. In Swat, the largest maize producing district of Pakistan, extensive trials and demonstrations were laid out in farmers' fields in the Swat valley in the 19'10s. The program was again revived in 19B3 when newer varieties and additional components such as herbicide weed control were tested.In addition. in 1983 a series of farm level surveys were initiated to better define the circumstances and constraints of farmers in maize production. These surveys, conducted over a three year period, 1983-85, provided substantial new insights into farmers' management and led to a reorientation of the maize onfarm research program in the 1985 season (Stevens et al. 1985;Byerlee and Hussain, 1986).In particular, it was recognized that improved maize technology was being tested in onfarm experiments under practices which were quite different from farmers' management. Trials were planted in lines at recommended seed rates, while Swat farmers invariably planted by the broadcast method at seed rates two to four times the recommended rate.Thinning in experiments was done at the three leaf stage while farmers began thinning much later and continued thinning up to harvest in order to provide fodder for animals. Seed, insecticide treatment and weed control by hoeing as used in onfarm experiments were also not commonly practiced by farmers.With the onfarm survey data in hand, many of these recommended practices (e.g. insecticide and line planting) were dropped from the list of priority recommendations (Stevens et al. 1985). However, the large differences between rcsearcher and farmer management also raised doubts about how other components of the recommended package, such as variety and recommended fertilizer doses. would respond under farmer management.This situation led to the design of a sct of farmer managed verification trials in which a few priority technological components were \"superimposed\" on farmer management over a relatively large number of sites.Although researchers supplied improved seed and fertilizer in the trials from planting to harvesting farmers performed all operations. Researchers observed these operations and also recorded yields in a sample of the plots at harvest time.This represents a rather radical departu~e from traditional experimental approaches used in Pakistan where researchers manage all operations and far.nlers have little or no participation in the experimental plots.The specific objectives of the farmer managed trials were as follows;(1). To verify that selected priority technological components were superior when tested under farmer management and therefore should be extended to farmers in the target area.(2). To monitor farmers' practices over the production cycle and thereby obtain more precise information on farmers' management than had previously been available from sing!e visit surveys.(3). To test the appropriateness of the methodology of farmer managed trials as an integral part of an onfarm re5e~rch program.A good deal of survey and experimental data was available from the irrigated Swat Valley and this information was the basis for selecting technological components to be included in Ul(ṽ erification trials. These trials were planted in both the irrigated valley bottom and also on mountain terraces (see next section) although very Ii tt.le was known about the mount.ain production systems.The three technological components included in the trials were:(1). Improved Variety; The research and demonstration program of the 1970s focussed much of its effort on the dissemination of seed of improved varieties.These varieties, specifically Zia and Changez, became widely used in the Swat valley but after termination of the program in 1977, very little seed of improved varieties was distributed.Meanwhile, two new varieties released by CCRI, Sarhad White and Azam, have been tested in onfarm trials. It was found that Azam, a medium maturity variety, (developed from CIMHYT Population 30 x Zia) performed very well in onfarm trials in the Swat valley in 1984 (Khan and Saleem, 1985).In addition, farmers expressed a strong preference for earlier maturity; Sarhad White was in fact later maturing than the farmers' variety (Byerlee et al, 1987). At the same time, it was recognized that under the high fertility, high yielding conditions of maize production in the Swat valley, improved variety represented a priority opportunity for increasing productivity.Hence, Azam variety was selected as one of the treatments.(2). Phosphorous; Experimental and survey data indicate an economic optimum dose of around 100 kg/ha of nitrogen and in fact most farmers on average used only slightly less than this amount.However, experimental data on phosphorous response was less conclusive. Overall, a response to phosphorous has been recorded but with considerable site to site variability. At the same time, farmer surveys showed that less than one half of farmers were using phosphorous on maize and that phosphorous users did not have significantly higher yieldn (Hyerlee et al., 1987). It was, therefore, decided to include phosphorous as a treatment in order to determine response over a larger sample of fields.(3). Early Thinning; A controversial issue in maize production in NWFP has always been the high seed rate used by farmers and their practice of delayed plant removal for fodder. An experiment was designed for the experiment station to estimate the benefits and costs of this practice compared to recommended practices of a lower seed rate and early thinning at three weeks after emergence (see Khan, 1986) However, after considerable discussion it was decided to include a treatment in the verification trial to compare the effect of early thinning (three weeks after emergence) to the target density of 60,000 to 70,000 plants(ha with farmers' practice of continuous thinning throughout the production cycle. Some researchers felt it would serve as a demonstration to farmers of the benefits of early thinning.Others viewed it as a way of comparing the increased yield from early thinning with the value of the fodder foregone.The final design was then a simple four treatment trial with stepwise changes in technology as follows:(1). Farmers' practice with farmer variety.(2). Improved variety (Azam) under farmer management.(3). Improved variety (Azam) with phosphorous (50 kg/hal under farmer management.(4). Improved variety (Azam) with phosphorous (50 kg/hal and early thinning at three weeks after emergence to 65,000 plants/ha.The verification trial was designed for the irrigated Swat valley bottom where all previous research has been concentrated. Two villages, Kabal (elevation 875 m.a.s.l) and Chalyar (elevation 1085 m.a.s.l.) were selected and five and seven verification trials laid out in each village, respectively (Figure 1).These two villages essentially belong to the same recommendation domain -irrigated plains of elevation 850 m to 1200 m.a.s.l.The only significant difference is that farmers in Kabal hoe their maize while in Chalyar they have changed to the \"seel\" method of postemergence cultivation with bullocks (see Byerlee and Hussain, 1UU5 for details).In the course of working in the valley it became apparent that a significant and increasing share of maize was being grown on mountain terraces at elevations ranging from 1300 to 2200 m m.a.s.1. 1 This zone has been completely neglected in past research and extension efforts and hence it was decided that an onfarm research program should be initiated in the mountains. At the time of planning the research programme, ...... almost no information on production systems as well as varietal, fertilizer and density responses was available for this zone.It was recognized that these mountain terraces, were potentially in a different recommendation domain with different problems and priorities.However, as an exploratory exercise it was decided to implement the same experimental program, including the verification experiments. Some 1b verification trials were laid out on the Malam Jabba road across an altitude sequence at elevations ranging from lbOO t o ' 1850 m.a.s.l. At the same time diagnostic survey of maize production systems in the mountain was planned for the 198b season in order to orient further research efforts.The plot size averaged about 500 m 2 but was varied in order to fit logically into the size and shape of fields.On the mountain terraces this required considerable imagination on the part of researchers due to the irregular shape of fields and presence of large rocks.Inputs were weighed in the field after determining plot size, and applied by the farmer.A basal dose of 100 kg N/ha was applied to the whole experiment.The farmer was also responsible for thinning early for treatment four.Farmers' were shown the plant to plant di5tance that would approximate a density of 65,000 plants/ha. They were requested to perform this operation at three weeks after emergence, although in practice they were often reluctant to cooperate in this treatment and sometimes delayed the thinning well beyond three weeks.Plant densities and other observations on insects, weed problems, drought etc. were recorded on visits to the field at 10 to 14 days intervals. At harvest time, three samples of size,,4 m x 2 m, were located randomly in each plot and harvested.Plant density, barren plants and fresh weight of ears and stover were recorded. A sub-sample of ears (about 10) and 1 kg of chopped stover was then sun dried to determine moisture content, and the ears were shelled to obtain the shelling percentage.Conversions were made as follows: Three months after harvest, one of the authors, a rural sociologist, revisited each farmer to assess farmers' opinion and perceptions about the technological components being , tested. This visit was timed so that farmers had had a chance to evaluate the cooking and storage qualities of Azam variety. A short questionnaire administered in an informal setting was used to elicit farmers' comments (see Appendix A).Data analysis was done on an Apple lIe micro-computer using the package, AIDA to facilitate across-site and treatment comparisons.Before analysing treatment responses, it is instructive to look at the overall results of the verification trials, and particularly the differences between the valley and mountain terraces. These are summarized in Tables 1 to 3. The main pointn shown by these results are as follows;(1). Because of the cooler temperature at higher altitudes, maize is planted one month earlier than in the valley, resulting in an increase in the maturity period of one month for the same variety.(2). All maize on the mountain terraces was rainfed while all maize in the valley was irrigated.(3). Host farmers on mountain terraces produced one crop per year and hence maize was usually planted after fallow. In the valley, maize followed either \"shaftal\" a leguminous fodder (Trifolium resupinatum) or wheat.(4). Farmers in mountain terraces lived by their field and applied farm yard manure (FYM) on a continuous basis. Farmern in the valley lived in the village and generally applied FYH to shaftal in Rabi cycle.(5). Host of the selected farmers were not growing a true local variety. Limited distribution of seed in previous years by the Agricultural Development Authority (ADA) and by the onfarm research project itself, had introduced Sarhad White to each village. However, in most cases this seed was already mixed with local varieties by cross pollination in previous cycles. Harvest data reflected some of these differences (Table 2). Average grain yields were 40 percent higher in the valley. Stover yields were approximately the same in each area so that differences in total dry matter yields were less pronounced. Yields were harvested at a significantly higher moisture content in the valley, and in fact most fields were harvested before reaching physiological maturity.Note particularly the relatively high-between-field and within-field variation in yields in the mountain terraces.Both types of variability were due in part to differences in age of terraces and consequently, the weathering of soils and build up of fertility through organic and chemical fertilizer application.However, yields and variability in yields in mountain terraces also reflect a number of problems that affected maize in 1985. Early season drought and insect attacks were particularly sovere in many sites in 1985 (Table 3).Hail damage also affected some fields late in the season.As a result, harvested densities were low in many plots.In contrast, the only hazard experienced by valley farmers in 1985 was lodging due to late season storms. hese data clearly indicate that the Swat valley and mountain terraces are two quite distinct recommendation domains since maize production practices and research opportunities are very different for the mountain terraces. The design of the farmer managed trials which was based on diagnostic surveys and onfarm experiments in the valley was not very appropriate for farmers of the mountains.In 1985, a diagnostic survey was conducted to try to correct these deficiencies. Because of these problems, and also because of the high variability in the results from the mountains, this report focuses more attention on the analysis of data from the valley.The results from the mountain terraces should be regarded as exploratory only. The design of the farmer managed trials which was based on diagnostic surveys and onfarm experiments in the valley was not very appropriate for farmers of the mountains.In 1985, a diagnostic survey was conducted to try to correct these deficiencies.Because of these problems, and also because of the high variability in the results from the mountains, this report focuses more attention on the analysis of data from the valley.The results from the mountain terraces should be regarded as exploratory only. Table 4 shows treatment effects on grain yields. For all sites harvested, there were no significant treatment effects. although the farmer practice with his variety (Treatment 1) gave the lowest yield. There were however. highly significant site effects.In order to conduct more indepth analysis, two sites were eliminated from further consideration. One site, the lowest yielding. was flooded by a broken canal early in the season and plant stand was generally very poor and uneven. The second site eliminated was also very uneven. After planting, it was found that one plot was planted after shaftal and the farmer generally managed this plot for grain and left other plots for fodder.The results over the remaining 10 sites are shown in Table 4. The F-ratio for-treatments is significant at the 15% level. However, partitioning of the ANOVA shows that Treatment 1 with farmer management of his variety gave significantly lower yields than the other treatments combined. That is. Azam outyielded the farmer variety by about 0.5 t/ha.There was.however. no apparent response to phosphorous or early thinning. An interesting result is the much lower variation in yields (shown by the, CV in Table 4) of Azam variety compared to the farmer variety, which in most cases was a mixture of local and ir..;lroved germplasm, especially Sarhad Whito., 1 These results, while not showing many statistically significant responses, arc important in two respects.First. yields under farmer management, especially with broadcast planting at high densities are quite high and are close to the yields generally observed in experiments conducted in farmers' fields that are line planted using recommended seed rates. Hence. the use of line planting and low seed rates is not likely to have much impact on yields and at the same time farmers would incur significant costs in terms of planting labour and reduced supply of green fodder 1 .Second, the improved variety, Azam, performed well under farmer management. Table 5 compares harvest data for Azam and the farmer variety2. Stover yields of Azam were somewhat higher than for the farmers' variety, an important criteria for farmers' selection of variety in this area. Azam was harvested at slightly higher moisture content for grain, although stover moisture content 1 The high seed rate does however, have a major disadvantage if farmers are to be encoraged to use high priced improved seed. 2 The superiority of Azam over the farmer variety appears to be due to genotype rather than seed quality. There was no apparent difference in seedling emergence and vigor between the two varieties. 10 however, no apparent response to phosphorous or early thinning. An interesting result is the much lower variation in yields (shown by the, CV in Table 4) of Azam variety compared to the farmer variety, which in most cases was a mixture of local and ir..;,roved germplasm, especially Sarhad White. These results, while not showing many statistically significant responses, are important in two respects.First, yields under farmer management, especially with broadcast planting at high densities are quite high and are close to the yields generally observed in experiments conducted in farmers' fields that are line planted using recommended seed rates. Hence, the use of line planting and low seed rates is not likely to have much impact on yields and at the same time farmers would incur significant costs in terms of planting labour and reduced supply of green fodder 1 .Second, the improved variety, Azam, performed well under farmer management. Table 5 compares harvest data for Azam and the farmer variety2. Stover yields of Azam were somewhat higher than for the farmers' variety, an important criteria for farmers' selection of variety in this area. Azam was harvested at slightly higher moisture content for grain, although stover moisture content was less than for the farmer variety. Farmers may have nelected their variety to have some \"stay green\" quality for fodder. Azam had a significantly higher shelling percentage, which reflects farmers' often expressed complaint of low shelling percent for 5arhad White. 1 Despite similar harvest densities, Azam had a somewhat higher percent of fertile plants than the farmers' variety.Finally, the degree of lodging of Azam was only one third of that of the farmers' variety. The farmer managed trials enabled 'more indepth measurement of farmers' plant stand management. a controversial issue in maize research. Farmers actually employed two management strategies.In Kabal village, they used somewhat lower seed rates, hoed fields for weed control and did all thinning manually. In Chalyar village, farmers employed the more common practice of a high seed rate followed by a \"seel\" -a post-emergence cultivation which removes many plants and controls weeds. They also thinned manually later in the season.The reasons for these differences in prac•tices are not clearly understood but seem to relate to a greater supply of labour in Kabal.The effects on plant density over the cycle are seen in ¥igure 2.In both cases initial stands were much lower than the potential if all seeds germinated. (Germination rates were not significantly different between varieties). Many seeds were buried too deeply for germination because of the practiee of broadcasting of seed and covering with a desi plough.After the seel operation, plant stands in Chalyar were similar to those in Kabul where lower seed rates were used.The early thinning of treatment four was practiced reluctantly by farmers.However, densities after thinning were close to the target density of 75,000 plants/ha, compared to over 100,000 plants/ha in the farmers' traditional mana~ement (~igure 3). Variability in early densities correlates closely with seed rates (r = .61 and .46 between seed rate and densities at knee high and silking, respectively) but not with harvest density. As the season progressed, farmers' management through plant removal was more important than seed rate in determining densities.The treatment of early thinning had no effect on grain and stover yields, but did reduce the yield of green fodder. Overall. plant density does not seem to be a major factor determining yields under the management conditions of this sample of farmers (Table 6).Both the degree of lodging and barrenness of plants were significantly and positively correlated with harvest density, but there was no effect on the yield of either grain or stover (Table 6).These results are consistent with the results of an experiment to carefully measure the benefits of farmers' plant stand management with that recommended by researchers (Khan, 1986). A more detailed analysis of density and yields for a large sample of survey farmers is given in Byerlee et ale 1987. Relationship between Grain and Stover Yields:Stover yields are an important component of economic benefits of maize production in Swat. Dry maize fodder selis for Us. 1000 -1500/acre, or about Us. 20 per 40 kg after harvest. In this trial, there appeared to be no conflict between Rrain and stover yields.In fact, stover yields were positively and significantly correlated to grain yields (r = .44**>.The major factors determining the number of days from plaflting to harvest were location and variety ('fable '{).At Chalyar which is 200m higher than Kabal, maturity was delayed by about b days.In both cases farmers who planted a Sarhad White mixture harvested about five days after farmers who used a pure\" local variety. On average, farmers appeared to harvest at very high moisture levels.Table 8 indicates that moisture levels were measured in excess of 50%, in some cases. Azam was harvested on the same date as the farmer's variety, and generally at higher moisture levels.This was true even for sites where the farmers' variety was Sarhad White or a mixture. Sarhad White is a later variety than Azam, but cross-pollination (Sarhad White x local material) and farmer selection may have made it earlier. 9. Clearly the major factor determining harvest moisture was the number of days from planting to harvesting. High moisture content at harvest leads to low shelling percentage and lower yields. 1 However, these findings on high grain moistur~content at harvest should be qualified by the fact that our harvesti~g methods differed signif icantly from the farmers' methe Io'armers normally cut the maize and then leave. it to dry for some days before removing the ears. This period may allow some additional opportunity for the grain to mature.To estimate yields in thp verification trials, we cut the maize at the same time as the farmer, but then removed the ears immediately to estimate grain yield.Interestingly, moisture content of the grain and the stover did not correlate strongly. Stover yields were higher with high grain moisture at harvest as expected if maize is harvested before physiological maturity. Generally the moisture content of stover was much less variable than for grain.In the case of the farmers' variety, the grain yield was also negatively correlated with moisture content at harvest (r = -.37) but other correlations that were exhibited for Azam did not hold, probably because of the considerable variation already noted in the farmers' variety. The above data have shown that a number of factors related to site charateristics, management and treatment, affected yields in the farmer managed plots. These effects can be best synthesised in a multiple regression analysis of differences in yields across plots.For simplicity and because of a relatively small number of observations only linear models were fitted. No significant interactions were found between independent variables. Two alternative models are shown in Table 9.The treatments of phosphorous and early thinning were omitted from these models after consistently failing to identify significant yield effects l .The coefficients of the linear model are easily interpreted.In Model 1, for example, Azam variety increased yields by 261 kg(ha, shaftal as a previous crop by 622 kg/ha while each one percentage chanp.e in moisture content decreased yields by 121 kg/ha, and so on.Hodel 1 explained 65% of the variation in yi~lds (RZ = .tib).All coefficients are of the expected sign, except possibly density, which in this case shows a positive effect on yield. All coefficients are significant at the 5% level, except that for Azam variety.The largest single effect on yields is the extent of lodging. Since lodging is highly correlated with the use of local variety and with higher density (Table 6), the coefficients for the variables, density and improved variety, are biased. Hodel 2 shows the results if the variable for lodging is omitted.The effect of Azam is now 785 kg/ha and highly significant.However, density has no effect on yields. Thus, yields tends to increase with higher densities but this effect is cancelled by an increased tendency to lodge. Results presented above demonstrate three important issues with respect to variety development and dissemination.(l). There are high returns to providing seed to farmers of improved varieties such as Azam. Given current prices, the marginal cost of improved seed over farmer seed is Rs 1.0/kg. With a conservative estimate of the yield increase due to improved seed of 500 kg/ha and a net price of maize (after susbtracting harvesting. shelling and marketing costs) of Rs 1.6/kg, the return to improved seed even at farmers' high seed rates is 800%. Few other innovations will provide such high rates of return 1 .1 A recent report (CIMHYT, 1986) shows that Pakistan has the lowest price of improved maize seed relative to the price of maize grain in the world. Even if the price of improved maize seed were to double to provide incentives to produce more seed, the returns to farmers from using improved varieties would still be very attractive.(2). Lodging is an illll\"J1\"La'IL factor reducing yields and efforts should be contlIluod to increase stalk strength of improved varieties without sacrificing stover yields.(3). Farmers would probably increase grain yields by delaying harvesting to grain maturity. ~'urther work is needed to measure yield losses from farmers' harvesting methods (i..e., drying on the stalk after cutting the plants) and to fully understand farmers' criteria for early harvest.Early harvesting most probably relates to the desire to preserve fodder quality. Incorporation of the \"stay green\" characteristic, which allows ears to dry relatively more quickly than the stover J would have potential benefits to farmers.Table 11 summarizes grain yield responses by treatment from the mountain terraces. Over all trials, there were no significant differences between treatments, althouf~h yields increased with each treatment level, except for Trea~menL 4 (early thinning).However, given the high level of variability in the mountains these results are not surprising. Differences between sites were highly significant. 1n ordor to provide a more meaningful compar i SUIl, :; i 1.0:\\ were grouped into low yielding fields « 2.5 t/ha) and high yielding fields (> 2.5 t/ha). In addition, one site was dropped from further analysis because of its extremely high intra-field variability (ev= 51%). which was caused by being located next to the farm house where organic manure was very irregularly applied. The low yielding sites were characterized by rocky unweathered soils which also compounded the problem of drought. There was a visual response to phosphorous application at two of these sites and acute phosphate deficiency symptoms in treatments 1 and 2.In the high yieldin~s ites, average yields were more than double the yields in low yi~•:l .ling sites but still somewhat lower than observed in the __ igated valley.There was ignificant between-site variation in yields.There was also a non-significant response of about 0.6 t/ha to the use of the improved variety Azam.Table 12 compares harvest data for the farmers' variet.y and for Azam at the high yielding sites.Stover yields of Azam were significantly higher (at the 10% level) and Azam also tended to have a lower percentage of barren plants and a significantly higher shelling percentage.These results arc consistant with the relative performance of varieties in the valley (Table 5). However, unlike in the valley, moisture pcrc 0 ntage of both grain and stover of Azam was somewhat lower than for the farmers' variety. Most farmers grew a Sarhad ~lite-type variety which is later than Azam.Infestation of loose smut, which was not present in the valley, significantly reduced the yield of the variety Azam, relative to the farmers' variety (Table 12). The yield loss due to smut can be assumed to be directly proportional to the number of diseased ears since yield was zero in these ears. By this method the loss in yield of Azam due to smut was estimated at .2\" t/ha, compared to the loss in the farmers' variety of .12 t/ha. (There was also some evidence that if farmers used seed derived from Sarhad ~lite smut infestation wa~more than for the true local variety). Smut infestation was significantly correlated with altitude (r = .40). Selected correlations for harvest data show most of the expected components of yield (Table 13). Grain and stover yields were significantly correlated for Azam variety. Stover yields were strongly correlated with harvest density. while grain yields showed no association.This supports the hypotheses of Byerlee and Hussain (1986) that farmers will not want to risk low densities even if grain yields are not affected, since they will suffer a significant loss in stover yields.As expected. the proportion of barren plants was closely associated with higher densities. but this did not seem to affect grain yields.Densities in the hills were severely reduced by the attack of cutworms early in the season (Figure 4). Hence in this situation a high initial plant stand was regarded as an insurance against insect attack. Some of the plots that had been thinned early and then subjected to insect attack had very low densities at harvest time, a point which farmers were quick to make when discussing implementation of treatment four. As in the valley, harvesting at high moisture content seems to be an important constraint on higher yields.In this case it was not possible to isolate factors such as altitude, variety and days from planting to harvesting that were hypothesised to affect maturity. It may be that the various drought. insect and fertility stresses had more impact on maturity.However. as expected. total dry matter yields highly ne~atively correlated with days from planting to harves ti nit.As in the irrigated valley. a simple multiple regression was fitted to the data set in an attempt to explain yield differences in yields in the eleven high yielding sites .. Regression coefficients for insect score. moisture percent of grain and altitude were significantly different from zero at the one percent level.The following equation summarizes these effects: YIJ:t:LD = 13014 + 244 AZAM -41ti lNSJ:t:C'l'SC (t-values are given in brackets. *** significant at the 1 percent level).All signs of the regression coefficients are in the expected direction.The t-value for AZAM is low and the effoct (244 kg/ha) is less than in the valley. The low coefficient for AZAH and-the negative effect of increasing ALTITUDJ:t: may reflect a decline in yield associated with an increase in the incidence of smut attack.If the potential yield (adjusted for smut infestation is used as the dependent variable, the regression coefficient for AZAM increases to 488 kg/ha (t-value = 1.4) and the coefficient for ALTITUDE falls to -1.70.These results from the mountains have several implications for further work;(1). Variability in the hills, both between fields and within fields is extremely high.This calls for more efforts to stratify farmers and fields into more homogeneous groups and probably a larger number of experimental sites, or different sampling procedures. maturity.However. as expected, total dry matter yields highly neaatively correlated with days from planting to twrvcs ti nIt. As in the irrigated valley. a simple multiple regression was fitted to the data set in an attempt to explain yield differences in yields in the eleven high yielding sitos .. Regression coefficients for insect score. moisture percent of grain and altitude were significantly different from zero at the one percent level.The following equation summarizes these effects: YIJ:t:LD = 13014 + 244 AZAM -41ti lNSJ:t:CTSC (t-values are given in brackets. *** significant at the 1 percent level).All signs of the regression coefficients are in the expected direction.The t-value for AZAM is low and the effect (244 kg/ha) is less than in the valley. The low coefficient for AZAH and-the negative effect of increasing ALTITUDJ:t: may reflect a decline in yield associated with an increase in the incidence of smut attack.If the potential yield {adjusted for smut infestation is used as the dependent variable, the regression coefficient for AZAM increases to 488 kg/ha (t-value = 1.4) and the coefficient for ALTITUDE falls to -1.70.These results from the mountains have several implications for further work;(1). Variability in the hills, both between fields and within fields is extremely high.This calls for more efforts to stratify farmers and fields into more homogeneous groups and probably a larger number of experimental sites, or different sampling procedures.(2).No treatment was sufficiently superior to warrant. a recommendation for improving maize production in the area.(3). As in th~valley, harvesting at high moisture content of grain seems to be an important yield reducing factor (with the same qualification on the difference between researchers' and farmers' harvestin~methods as we made above in discu55ing this problem for the valley) (4). Insects were a major problem in 19t1~and research efforts are needed to find efficient ways to control insect5. ospecially cutworm.(5). Yields of Azam variety were significently reduced by loose smut and head smut. Breeding programs should give attention to screening for smut resistance.An important part of researeh in farmers• fields is to solicit farmers' active involvement in order to benefit from their experiences and opinions.From the post-harvest survey of cooperating farmers. a number of valuable insights were gained for planning the following years' activities.In all. 24 of 27 cooperating farmers participated in these interviews.The interviews were conducted by a rural sociolo,~i5t skilled in farmer interview techniques but not part of the research team who laid out the trials.This we hoped would provide some objectivity to farmers' responses.Nevertheless, despite these precautions, there may be some positive response bias by farmers who had built a close relationship with the maize researchers.Farmers' were asked to compare Azam variety with their own variety with respect to a number of characteristics such as yield and maturity (Table 14). With respect to yield, there was no clearcu~favourite. Farmers in valley environments slightly preferred Az.am while farmers in the mountains favoured their own variety.¥~rmcr5' ranking of the varieties with respect to yield was also compared with the actual results from the trial.A difference of 0.5 t/ha (about 10%) in the experiment was assumed to be needed to clearly rank one variety over the other.On this criterion, two out of eleven farmers in the valley were in error in their yield assessment.In the mountains however, seven of the thirteen farmers ranked the varieties in reverse order to t l . ~outcome of the experiment.A number of reasons might explain T... i 5 anomaly. Firstly, farmers may have difficulty measuring anlO jl~ging the relatively small yield differences due to variety al0ue. Secondly, the substantial within-field variability in the mountains means that it is difficult for both researchers and farmers to measure real yield differences. Farmers on terraced mountain lands also have very poor measures of land area, and hence will have difficul ty comparinl~yields. 'l'hirdly, farmer~in tho n\\()Untnin5 may have been react.ing against other perceived nCt~ative aspects of Azam variety discussed below.Additional evidence that farmers' have difficulty qlJ\"'lIt.ifyin~differences betwccn varietic~i s shown by Un: dat.a for stover characteristics in Table 14. Clearly, farmers in t.he hi l.ls overwhelmingly believed that Azam gave lower stover yields, while overall in the experiment Azam gave 26% hi~her stover yields (significant at the 6 percent level).~'arm'ors j n the mountains also preferred the stover quality of their O~l variety. Azam, of course, is somewhat shorter and less lcafy than the farmers' variety and this may account for this perception.Simildr problcms of farmers' comparisons of ~t.raw yields for two different wheat varieties have been recorded by Hussain (1986).It'armers' ability to assess yield dif f orcnGCS is an \"important researchable topic.A small research project, should be designed to test farmer perception of yield differences since this has potentially important implications for extension.It'or example more emphasis might be placed on farmer field days at harvest where the grain yield and stover yield are measured in the presence of farmers. In the mountains, Azam was almost unanimously ranked as the earlier variety and several farmers saw this as an advantage in their efforts to increase cropping intensity. On the other hand, farmers in the mountain had clearly noted the hiRher smut incidence in Azam and this was regarded as a serious problem with this variety.There seemed to be little difference in farmers' ranking of the varieties with respect to chapati making quality.In an open ended question, farmers were asked to name other advantages and disadvantages of Azam.Most farmers' in the valley noted its resistance to lodging, a fact which was also clearly shown in the experimental data. Several farmers also appreciated characteristics of Azam as a green fodder; some complained, huwever, of the thick stalk size of Azam when compared with their own variety.The final test of variety acceptance is whether farmers grow the variety the following year.Table 1b shows the breakdown by farmer intentions for the 1986 season. Most farmers intended to plant both Azam and their own variety in spite of having sufficient seed of Azam to meet their full requirements. Only one farmer intended to change completely to Azam.r'armers seemed to want to test Azam at least one more year before either accepting or rejecting the variety. However, it is clear that the bulk of the maize area for cooperating farmers in the valley will probably be planted to Azam in 1~86 while in the hills only a small amount will be planted, probably where an early variety is needed in the wheat-maize rotation.In wheat demonstrations sown with the same group of farmers after maize, all farmers intended to follow wheat by maize but sown at later than the normal planting date. fe'armers op inion of (,•arly thinning was also assessed. Most farmers agreed Lhat earLy thinning was beneficial for grain yields but in the trial they were reluctant to execute t.his as required by 'l'reatmont four.Given the importance of fodder in the valley and in5ect damage in the mount.ains, early thinning does not seem a major priority to pursue in further research.Although we have shown 'that maize was generally cut before physiological maturity, farmers' themselves believed that harvesting of the verification plots was initiated at the opportune time for grain yields and some farmers in the mounta•ins even felt that Azam was too dry! l'urther information is required to understand farmers' reasons for early harvesting and research should focus on how farmers decide when to harvest and yield losse~) in ~:rain and st.over from farmers' harvesting methods.In the valley, Azam seems to be generally favoured by farmers and can be recommended in this area.Hare work by breeders on \"stay green\" characteristics and tolerance to higher densities seems justified.Continued emphasis on lodging resistance is also warranted.In the mountains, farmers' assessment of Azam variety generally supports the results of the experiments. ¥urther research work is, however.needed before a recommendation for variety can be made in the mountains.Furthermore, breeders need to screen varieties for smut resistance and also need to look for an early maturing variety to fit potential cropping patterns in thJ..s area, especially maize following wheat.1n the mountains, farmers have now started growing wheat on a fairly wide scale because of: (1) the introduction of fertilizer and earlier wheat varieties and (2) the substitution of wheat for maize in home consumption.Research is needed on alternative maize-wheat combinations such as a late wheat variety (e.g. Pak 81) with an early maize variety (Shaheeu), or an early wheat variety (Sonalika) with a mid-maturity maize variety (e.g. Azam).Careful assessment of the risks in wheat and maize production will help to determine which crop will dominate in the crop rotation.Phosphorous response was noted in only a few trials bu~ne~rly half the farmers claimed to have noted a response and intend to apply more phosphorous this year. ¥armers were also observed to use phosphorous in quite variable amounts and frequencies. Site history of phosphate usage should be recorded carefully in future research work on phosphate response.ft'armer5 op inion of ('>arly thinning was also assessed. Most farmers agreed Lhilt earLY thinning was beneficial for grain yields but in the trial they were reluctant to execute t.his as required by 'l'roalmont. four.Given the importance of fodder in the valley and insect damage in the mount.ains, early thinning does not seem a mlljor priority to pursue in further research.Although we have shown l..hat maize was generally cut before physiological maturity, farmers' themselves believed that harvesting of the verification plots was initiated at the opportune time for grain yields and some farmers in the mounta•ins even felt that Azam was too dry! },t'urther information is required to understand farmers' reasons for early harvesting and research should focus on how farmers decide when to harvest and yield 105505 in grain and stover from farmers' harvesting methods.In the valley, Azam seems to be generally favoured by farmers and can be recommended in this area.More work by breeders on \"stay green\" characteristics and tolerance to higher densities seems justified.Continued emphasis on lodging resistance is also warranted.In the mountains, farmers' assessment of Azam variety generally supports the results of the experiments. ¥urther research work is, however.needed before a recommendation for variety can be made in the mountains.Furthermore, breoders need to screen varieties for smut resistance and also neod to look for an early maturing variety to fit potential cropping patterns in thlS area, especially maize following wheat.In the mountains. farmers have now started growing wheat on a fairly wide scale because of: (1) the introduction of fertilizer and earlier wheat varieties and (2) the substitution of wheat for maize in home consumption.Research is needed on alternative maize-wheat combinations such as a late wheat variety (e.g. Pak 81) with an early maize variety (Shaheeu), or an early wheat variety (Sonalika) with a mid-maturity maize variety (e.g. Azam).Careful assessment of the risks in wheat and maize production will help to determine which crop will dominate in the crop rotation.Managed TrialsFarmer managed verification trials should be continued during 1986 in both the Swat valley and mountain environments. In the valley. major factors to be included should be variety and phosphorous.Since farmers' in the valley use quite high levels of nitrogen, the marginal pay-offs to phosphorous use should be compared to that in nitrogen.In the mountains. two varieties should be included in the trials -Sarhad White for rCRular planting and New Shaheen for late plantinn. Phosphorous response should also be tested, and a treatment aimed at insect control should be devised.Survey work should be an integral part of the research program.At present, major priority should be placed on the mountain zone to better understand the evolving farming systems, risk hazards and production practices.In addition, small research projects should be initiated to understand farmers' harvesting methods and their criteria for harvesting at high grain moisture and also to statistically test farmers' ability to discriminate between yields of treatments in large plots.For the latter, two treatments only should be included in the trial -with and without phosphate, or two distinct varieties.At the same time, the maize breeding program has a number of new selection criteria to ponder -\"stay green\", disease resistance (smut) and early maturity.On the basis of the results of the verification trials, we are confident that farmers in the Swat valley will accept Azam variety if improved seed is available.In the absence of a formal seed industry, extension should work with leading farmers and farmer groups to help demonstrate Azam variety and multiply seed at the village level.Methods for maintaining seed purity by selecting seed ears from the center of the field also need to be demonstrated to farmers.The provision of improved seed will add 500-750 kg/ha to yields and provide a high payoff to an extension and local level seed multiplication campai~l.In the mountains, a similar campaign to promote the use of the improved variety may also be justified, if seed is treated to prevent smut infestation (eg. using Vitavax).The verification trials, however, provide no basis for widespread recommendation of the other technological components -phosphorous and early thinning -although we suggest continued research on phosphorous response.Experimentation in Pakistan. even when it takes place ill farmers' fields. is usually managed by the researcher.'fhe u~periences in Swat show that a great deal can be learnt from farmer managed experiments with quite simple designs. Statistical niceties of experimental design and significance levels may have to be sacrificed. but this is more than compensated by the larger number of trials that can be executed by the research programme and the information obtained from farmers' ~articipation in the trials. More importantly. data generated are directly applicable to farmer circumstances. Follow-up surveys to assess farmers' opinion should be an integral part of the methodology.Indeed, this moni torinl~of farmers should be initiated at planting time and greater efforts made to record farmers' operations and plot history.This study has also demonstrated the special problems of working in mountain environments. The high level of variability characteristic of these environments suggests that more resources will need to be invested in the survey part of the program in order to•analyse factors responsible for this variability and stratify farmers and fields accordingly.Even then, the large within field variability means that researchers will have to either plant more experiments to give the same amount of information as in other environments, or they will have to settle for lower confidence in their recommendations and farmers' themselves will playa greater role in adapting recommendations to their specific needs. The need then is to extablish principles to guide extension and farmers in deciding on whether a particular technological component is relevant in a specific situation.Follow-up survey of cooperators for farmer managed verification trials, Swat, 1986. In one plot, we requested that you thin the mai ze carl y (<.at. J weeks after germination) to reduce plant density. ._------"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0953507976.json b/main/part_2/0953507976.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72b7224c5196eafd132edecadd219ff90521a32a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0953507976.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"9bacd25a-0c82-457c-bcf5-93aa8ebdae9e","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0956031544.json b/main/part_2/0956031544.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7febe764c937b28ae2477779dd0f0a56ce8dcd24 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0956031544.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ed50391a355d1b9f04a34fad5546be6e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://apps.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/Publications/PDFS/CIFOR-ICRAF-Annual-Report-2020-FR.pdf","id":"-1347656731"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"40959aba-a288-4b97-a17b-4eab00184795","content":"À l'aube de l'année 2020, personne ne pensait qu'une pandémie allait transformer le quotidien des populations de la planète. Cependant, si aucun pays n'a été épargné par le COVID-19, tous ne l'ont pas vécu pareillement.Au CIFOR-ICRAF, nous étions très bien placés pour rechercher l'origine de ce virus. Nos experts sur la viande sauvage ont été réactifs pour répondre aux appels pressants qui réclamaient l'interdiction de la vente en gros. En s'appuyant sur des données factuelles, ils ont plaidé la cause des populations pour lesquelles les protéines et les nutriments apportés par le gibier sont indispensables. Cet exemple montre, qu'en dépit des restrictions imposées par la pandémie, nos chercheurs n'ont pas relâché leurs efforts en poursuivant leurs travaux scientifiques de haut niveau sur les forêts et les paysages, ce qui nous permet de maintenir notre rang dans la communauté internationale de la recherche de pointe. Les pages qui suivent présentent d'autres exemples éloquents, notamment sur l'amélioration des semences d'arbres et les actions de restauration en Éthiopie, l'agroforesterie en Asie du Sud-Est et un nouveau modèle d'utilisation durable du bois de chauffe dans les camps de réfugiés.Lorsque les principales conférences internationales sur le changement climatique et la biodiversité ont été repoussées à une date ultérieure, nous avons pu continuer les échanges grâce à divers événements en ligne, Dans le même temps, nous avons balisé l'action de notre nouvel organisme né de la fusion de deux entités, en harmonisant nos processus internes et en affinant notre vision et notre mission. Notre nouvelle stratégie sur dix ans expose tout l'intérêt des arbres, de l'agroforesterie et des forêts dans lesquels résident des solutions pour affronter cinq grands enjeux : la déforestation et le recul de la biodiversité, l'accélération du changement climatique, les chaînes de valeur et les filières non durables, la nécessité de transformer les systèmes de production alimentaire et les graves inégalités dont souffrent les femmes, les peuples autochtones et les communautés rurales vulnérables.Dans le courant de l'année 2020, de nouveaux axes à visée globale ont été créés pour apporter des solutions pertinentes et concrètes au bénéfice des populations et de la planète : les Plateformes de partenariat pour l'avenir (Transformative Partnership Platforms), les Paysages d'action (Engagement Landscapes) et les Initiatives phare (Flagship Products). Il s'agit d'approches inédites qui rassemblent nos partenaires pour concevoir et faciliter la mise en oeuvre de solutions transformantes en vue d'un véritable impact « sur le terrain ». C'est également en 2020 qu'un programme innovant a vu le jour, celui sur les Paysages résilients (Resilient Landscapes) qui est destiné à transformer radicalement l'utilisation des terres et les filières agricoles en se positionnant au carrefour de la science et du monde économique, de la finance, des gouvernements et de la société civile pour tout ce qui concerne les paysages forestiers et agroforestiers.Malgré les vicissitudes de l'année passée, le personnel du CIFOR-ICRAF a réalisé un travail remarquable, en restant productif et performant, et en témoignant soutien et empathie aux collègues, à nos partenaires et à nos bénéficiaires.Après une année 2020 qui s'est terminée sur la promesse de nouveaux vaccins porteurs d'espoir à l'horizon, nous regardons droit devant avec optimisme et détermination pour « reconstruire en mieux pour l'avenir », et pour commencer, tout au long de cette décennie des Nations Unies pour la restauration des écosystèmes. Tout ce que nous souhaitons, c'est un avenir plus résilient grâce à la vitalité des arbres, des forêts et des paysages qui peuvent empêcher la propagation des zoonoses, atténuer le changement climatique, renforcer la biodiversité et la productivité agricole, et enfin promouvoir la santé et le bien-être des populations. Voir les dernières évolutions de ces initiatives en 2020 à la page 16 et aux suivantes. La restauration des terres peut être une piste à exploiter pour parvenir à la sécurité alimentaire et améliorer les moyens de subsistance de certaines populations africaines parmi les plus vulnérables vivant en milieu aride. Mais alors que nous entrons dans la Décennie des Nations Unies pour la restauration des écosystèmes, il est évident que, si l'on veut généraliser la restauration, il faudra adapter les interventions en fonction des populations et des lieux, car une solution unique ne pourra pas convenir partout.Financé par l'UE et le FIDA, un projet quinquennal vient de démarrer sur la reconnaissance des agriculteurs comme agents de changement : ces intendants des terres sont en effet constamment dans l'innovation. Par conséquent, en leur donnant des moyens pour tester et comparer différentes formules de restauration, comme la diversification des cultures, l'agroforesterie et des méthodes adaptées de conservation de l'eau et des sols (démarche appelée « options by context », c.-à-d. les solutions selon le contexte), il serait possible de les aider à résoudre les problèmes dès qu'ils surviennent.Permettant à des partenaires très divers de travailler ensemble dans un cycle de coapprentissage (des secteurs public et privé, de la recherche et de la formation, du monde économique et des institutions de gouvernance), ce projet a débouché sur la mise en place de communautés de pratique qui ont pu optimiser leurs ressources pour restaurer les terres dégradées. Ce sont plus de 100 000 personnes qui en ont bénéficié directement ou indirectement au Niger, au Mali, en Éthiopie et au Kenya. Au Kenya, la survie des arbres sur les exploitations agricoles est passée de 30 % en 2016 à plus de 80 % en 2019. Malgré un consensus scientifique sans ambiguïté, les effets du réchauffement climatique sur les écosystèmes et la santé humaine continuent de s'amplifier. Pour remédier au dérèglement climatique, le CIFOR-ICRAF présente des solutions fondées sur la nature en les analysant à la lumière des données scientifiques. Il s'agit de la gestion durable des forêts et des zones humides, de l'agroforesterie et de la restauration des paysages.C'est en 2020 que s'est achevée la troisième phase de l'étude comparative mondiale sur la REDD+ (GCS-REDD+) qui portait sur l'évaluation de la conception des politiques et sur l'impact des actions destinées à « réduire les émissions issues de la déforestation et de la déforestation et la dégradation des forêts » (REDD+). Grâce à une série d'ateliers virtuels pour les parties prenantes nationales organisés dans le cadre de l'étude GCS REDD+, des instances de décision, des praticiens, des chercheurs et des bailleurs de fonds se sont réunis pour évoquer les dernières connaissances scientifiques sur la REDD+ et réfléchir aux moyens de les traduire en actes.Au Pérou, le CIFOR-ICRAF a travaillé avec le Service des aires protégées du pays (SERNANP) pour coproduire l'outil « Où en sommes-nous ? (¿Como Vamos?), qui permet une réflexion et un suivi participatif des forums multipartites. Au Vietnam, nos scientifiques ont été invités à se joindre à un groupe de travail national pour élaborer la stratégie de développement forestier du pays Les régimes alimentaires de base sont traditionnellement complétés et diversifiés grâce aux arbres qui procurent des fruits, des légumes, des graines, des noix et des huiles. Quand ils sont intégrés aux systèmes agroforestiers, ils peuvent contribuer de manière substantielle à la sécurité alimentaire et à la nutrition des petits exploitants, parfois même sur plusieurs générations. En Afrique de l'Est, le projet Food Trees, financé par l'Union européenne, le FIDA et GIZ, a permis de codévelopper sur mesure avec des agriculteurs des « assortiments d'arbres comestibles » afin de résoudre les problèmes de disponibilité saisonnière et de déficits en micronutriments, en particulier en vitamines A et C, en fer et en acide folique. Ces assortiments comportent des espèces d'arbres localement disponibles et acceptables pour l'alimentation sur le plan culturel dont la récolte s'échelonnant sur toute l'année permet de nourrir la population.Par des enquêtes et des échanges avec les agriculteurs, les chercheurs ont constaté qu'il était difficile de s'alimenter et qu'il y avait des déficits en nutriments à certaines périodes. Les assortiments peuvent être adaptés à différents lieux présentant des conditions agroécologiques diverses, ainsi qu'à la variabilité de l'adéquation des espèces, à la phénologie des arbres fruitiers et aux préférences des agriculteurs.des émissions de gaz à effet de serre résultent de la production alimentaire des produits alimentaires se gâtent ou sont gaspillés« Les données spatialisées nous ont permis non seulement d'enregistrer la dynamique socioécologique de la diversité de la production alimentaire chez les petits exploitants, mais aussi d'exploiter les informations sur la consommation individuelle afin de mieux cerner les déficits de production et en nutriments pour les résorber. Quand a éclaté le tollé exigeant l'interdiction dans le monde entier des marchés de produits frais, de la chasse au gibier, du commerce et de la consommation de viande sauvage, les scientifiques du CIFOR-ICRAF sont montés au créneau, données factuelles à l'appui. En mars 2020, ils publiaient un éditorial dans Forests News pour exposer que cette interdiction ferait peser le spectre de la malnutrition sur des millions de communautés, dont de nombreuses populations autochtones, qui ne disposent d'aucune autre source abordable de protéines.La consommation non durable de viande sauvage est l'un des principaux facteurs du recul de la biodiversité, mais le vrai problème est la migration en Enfin, en octobre, le Partenariat de collaboration sur la gestion durable de la faune sauvage et la FAO ont publié une déclaration commune présentant quatre principes pour réduire le risque de zoonoses au moyen de « plans de relance fondés sur la nature ». des produits de supermarché contiennent de l'huile de palme 50 %Bien que le secteur privé clame haut et fort son engagement en faveur de la déforestation zéro et des chaînes de valeur durables, les signes d'un véritable changement se font attendre, tandis que la consommation mondiale de produits issus des forêts est en hausse constante. Le CIFOR-ICRAF aide à transformer une production durable en revenus, ce qui met en évidence les effets positifs du commerce et des investissements dans les divers produits issus des arbres et des forêts sur les conditions de vie en zone rurale, tout en limitant le préjudice pour l'environnement. « Nous promettons de nous engager à long terme auprès de nos partenaires, notamment les entrepreneurs et les populations locales dans les paysages dans lesquels nous travaillons. Nous n'avons pas de recette magique pour transformer le non durable en durable, mais en faisant partie du tissu social local, nous pouvons travailler ensemble vers des buts communs et plus durables. » Paolo Cerutti, scientifique senior et chef par intérim du bureau régional de NairobiIl est toujours difficile pour les femmes et les personnes des communautés rurales et autochtones de satisfaire leurs besoins fondamentaux personnels et d'avoir une activité qui leur permette de subsister. Par ailleurs, on s'attend à ce que les conséquences économiques de la pandémie du COVID-19 poussent un demi-milliard de personnes dans l'extrême pauvreté. Le CIFOR-ICRAF s'emploie à remédier à ces inégalités et à encourager des modes de gouvernance porteurs de changement positif. Pour atténuer les impacts environnementaux des déplacements de populations en Afrique subsaharienne, le CIFOR-ICRAF a créé un « paysage d'action » (Engagement Landscape) pour tester puis mettre en oeuvre grandeur nature ce modèle et d'autres alternatives. « Ces modèles peuvent être adaptés à chaque contexte dès que les déplacés commencent à arriver, pour empêcher la survenue rapide de la déforestation, de la dégradation et de conflits sociaux », a expliqué Abdon Awono, scientifique qui dirige les activités au Cameroun. Paysages résilients (Resilient Landscapes) est une initiative innovante du CIFOR-ICRAF, qui vise à exploiter le potentiel de la science et de la recherche pour développer les investissements dans les solutions fondées sur la nature afin de lutter contre le changement climatique, la déforestation, le déclin de la biodiversité et la dégradation des terres. L'idée est de promouvoir les partenariats publicprivé grâce au montage de projets en commun, au partage des bénéfices et à des mesures fiables de la performance pour générer des dividendes pour les investisseurs et les entreprises à partir du capital financier, social et naturel.Dans les paysages et les chaînes de valeur, la vocation de l'initiative Paysages résilients est d'amplifier les investissements ciblant les solutions fondées sur la nature en faisant la promotion de cas de référence étayés par la science, en mobilisant des investissements financiers, en facilitant les partenariats public-privé et en veillant à la conformité sur les plans environnemental, social et de la gouvernance (ESG).Cette initiative permet d'offrir un ensemble inédit de produits, de services et de relations grâce aux données scientifiques qui alimentent l'analyse et la conception, et ceci dans le cadre de partenariats ou de contrats à divers échelons avec différents acteurs publics, privés et de la société civile.L'initiative Paysages résilients permet d'évaluer les projets sur cinq critères interdépendants : faisabilité technique, viabilité financière, mise en oeuvre opérationnelle, acceptabilité sociale et politique, durabilité environnementale.À travers Paysages résilients, le CIFOR-ICRAF s'appuie sur ses partenariats de longue date avec les gouvernements, les bailleurs de fonds, les institutions multilatérales, le monde universitaire, les ONG, les communautés locales, les agriculteurs, et enfin les groupes de jeunes et de femmes. Le Forum mondial sur les paysages (GLF) a enregistré une croissance sans précédent sur le plan numérique au cours de cette année 2020 marquée par la pandémie du COVID-19. Toujours avec une longueur d'avance, il a lancé en juin la première conférence environnementale totalement en ligne destinée à toute la planète afin de combler les déficits de connaissances et de faire progresser la science.En 2020, le GLF a organisé deux grands événements numériques, qui ont été suivis par plus de 10 000 personnes et ont intéressé des millions d'internautes :» Le GLF de Bonn 2020 : Avec plus de 300 intervenants, des centaines d'organisations, 235 000 interventions sur les médias sociaux, 22 000 messages plus 2 500 articles échangés par les participants, « L'alimentation en temps de crise », première conférence environnementale du genre, a mis en évidence la nécessité des plateformes comme le GLF pour continuer à se faire l'écho de divers « porteurs de savoir » de tous les coins du monde.» GLF Biodiversité : « Un monde, une santé » a mobilisé des dizaines de millions de personnes, braqué le projecteur sur la restauration des écosystèmes et contribué à la prochaine feuille de route mondiale pour la biodiversité. Cet événement s'est inscrit dans l'élan international pour « reconstruire en mieux » par la recommandation d'un ensemble de sept mesures.La décennie des Nations Unies pour la restauration des écosystèmes -Le GLF a été nommé partenaire officiel de la préparation de la décennie des Nations Unies pour la restauration des écosystèmes 2021-2030.Le programme d'impact sur les systèmes alimentaires, l'utilisation des terres et la restauration (FOLUR) -contribution à la communication et à la gestion des connaissances stratégiques sur cette plateforme instaurée par la Banque mondiale.Les jeunes dans les paysagesimplication de plus de 60 000 jeunes dans la restauration des paysages. Cette année, l'initiative a lancé le programme des délégués à la restauration (Restoration Stewards), qui prévoit de financer en Afrique, en Amérique latine et en Asie six projets de restauration pilotés par des jeunes bénéficiant d'un mentorat.Apprentissage -séances de formation de niveau professionnel sur Landscape Academy, plateforme gratuite en ligne (portant sur les cinq thèmes du GLF) suivie par plus de 18 000 apprenants à ce jour.GLFx -rassembler une communauté mondiale, GLFx, pour susciter et accélérer l'action vers des paysages plus durables.Finance durable -partenariat avec le Luxembourg pour inscrire la finance durable à l'événement « GLF Luxembourg Investment Cases ». Photos : Couverture : Terrasses créées à la suite de tremblements de terre répétés dans le Sichuan en Chine Liu Qiankun ; p. 3 : Villageoise portant des légumes à Yangole en RDC. Axel Fassio/CIFOR ; p. 6 : Restauration des terres au Tchad dans le bassin du lac Tchad. TerrAfrica Partnership ; p. 7 : Éléphants pâturant dans les tourbières de la réserve de faune de Padang Sugihan. Rifky/CIFOR ; p. 8 : Vue aérienne de la forêt amazonienne près de Manaus, capitale de l'État brésilien d'Amazonas. Neil Palmer/CIAT ; p. 9 : Cueilleuses de thé dans le Nord-est de l'Assam en Inde. Amit Ranjan/Unsplash ; p. 11 : On trouve fréquemment de la viande sauvage en vente sur les marchés des tropiques, comme ici dans le Nord du Ghana. Axel Fassio/CIFOR ; p. 12 : Transport de grumes sur la rivière Katingan dans le Centre du Kalimantan. Sigit Deni Sasmito/CIFOR ; p. 13 : Production de cacao au Cameroun. Ollivier Girard/CIFOR ; p. 14 : Femmes portant du bois de feu près du camp de réfugiés de Gado-Badzéré au Cameroun. Arnauld Chyngwa/CIFOR ; p. 15 : Femme et son enfant près de la ville de Sumbawa Besar sur l'île indonésienne de Sumbawa. Aulia Erlangga/CIFOR ; p. 16 : Dans les rizières en terrasse au Cambodge. Pixabay ; p. 17 : Ouvrière de la pépinière de cacaoyers dans le village de Sokoru en Éthiopie. Ollivier Girard/CIFOR ; p. 18 : Benki Piyãko, chef autochtone venu d'Amazonie, chante dans sa langue lors de la clôture de l'événement numérique de deux jours sur la santé de la biodiversité et de la planète. Pilar Valbuena/GLF ; p. 19 : Plantation de gnetum à Lekié dans la région du Centre du Cameroun.Citation : CIFOR-ICRAF. 2021. Rapport annuel 2020 du CIFOR-ICRAF : Reconstruire en mieux pour l'avenir. Bogor, Indonésie : Centre de recherche forestière internationale (CIFOR) et Nairobi, Kenya : Centre international de recherche en agroforesterie (ICRAF). 20 pp."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0961156237.json b/main/part_2/0961156237.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7bf615b474cc80651f8847c900ac24fb55ba47de --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0961156237.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2c03cf675b9a78388e0f4caf955d2ff1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a8dc503e-e341-4915-804c-2c3cacf1db20/retrieve","id":"-1732080325"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"859b8de4-5dee-4d73-9295-7c0ee64d2348","content":"In the north, the main source of water is glacial snowmelt from the Himalayas and rainfall; and in peninsular India, the annual monsoon. India's population has increased from about 343 million in 1947 to 1,181 million in 2008. More than half of the population is active in agriculture. Total water demand will equal water availability by 2025, but industrial and domestic water demand are expected to rise drastically at the expense of the agriculture sector, which, in turn, will have to produce more food with less water.India has the second largest irrigated area in the world, but due to the rapid expansion of irrigation, with its emphasis on new construction, irrigation performance and the sector's increasing management needs have not received adequate attention. The development impact of irrigation is well below its potential, and deficiencies in implementation have accumulated over time.At the grassroots level, farmers are turning to groundwater. Unless policymakers can come to grips with the current anarchic situation, India could well be facing a groundwater crisis in the near future.Public sector irrigation is failing to live up to its potential, which is largely due to underinvestment in the maintenance of infrastructure. Rehabilitation requirements represent an increasing part of construction investment and environmental problems are mounting. Major investments are also needed to improve management capacity.IWMI's work in India focuses on research-backed insights for improved policies and practices to help India address its water challenges now and in the future.With nearly 25 million diesel and electric pumps at work, the supply and regulation of energy is an important factor in managing water resources. The Jyotigram Yojana scheme in Gujarat State is a landmark example of how effective policy can be in regulating groundwater extraction and creating equitable water markets. Based in part on the research IWMI conducted with local partners, the government invested US$250 million in the scheme, which has helped farmers increase their incomes and reduce groundwater extraction and electricity use by as much as 50%.In the water-scarce Krishna Basin, IWMI researchers and local partners are implementing activities aimed at improving water productivity. This includes mapping the water-land-poverty nexus in the Lower Krishna Basin to improve basin-scale productivity through integrated hydrologic, water resources and economic research, looking at the implications of different water-allocation scenarios for food production and long-term resource sustainability in the basin.With little control on groundwater extraction, the country faces serious groundwater depletion (Credit: Aditi Mukherji, IWMI).The IWMI-Tata Water Policy Program (ITP) was founded in 2000 and is jointly supported by the Sir Ratan Tata Trust and IWMI. The program is providing data and information of use to policymakers at central, state and local levels and helping them to address issues in sustainable groundwater management, water scarcity, rural poverty and livelihoods, by translating research findings into practical policy recommendations. Under the ITP, IWMI works in close cooperation with a range of partners across India to identify, analyze and document relevant water management approaches and current practices to improve future policy.Impact of different water management technologies and their adoption levels are being analyzed in order to outline the technologies that are suitable for different regions and farms.Impact of climate change on agricultural production is being analyzed in the Godavari, Krishna and Cauvery river basins. Several adaptation strategies both at farm and community level are outlined.The fragile ecosystems are facing water shortages. The fragmented farm holdings need appropriate and affordable technologies. Gravity-based micro-irrigation technologies are implemented in selected states such as Uttarakhand.Since its inception, IWMI has been working with the Indian Government and local partners on solutions to some of the most complex and pressing water management problems anywhere on Earth. IWMI is seeking partners and funds for the following research projects.Nearly 90% of the Indian population live in basins with some form of water scarcity or food production deficit. One of the key factors directly affecting the poor is inequity in irrigation water distribution, further aggravated by inequity in landholdings. This situation underpins the need for more focused pro-poor options to increase returns to poor farmers in low productivity areas.Groundwater is a key research area in India. There is arsenic contamination of groundwater in most areas, and groundwater overdraft threatens India's long-term food security goals. Managed Aquifer Recharge programs on a basin-scale may provide a solution.Closely connected with groundwater use is the issue of irrigation. The sector needs renewed investment in both physical infrastructure and human capacity along with new directions in policy. The feasibility of large-scale river linking and water transfers need careful consideration in light of potential alternatives. Irrigation of food and fodder crops with urban wastewater is a reality in India but gets scant attention as a potential resource. India must set targets for increasing the productivity of water across the entire agriculture sector. This will entail new technologies such as drip and sprinkler irrigation on a larger scale as well as smarter policies.The impact of a warming climate is already visible in more frequent extreme weather events. Indian agriculture can adapt to floods and droughts if policymakers can be convinced that water must be managed at the basin and landscape level.Nearly 90% of the Indian population live in basins with some form of water scarcity or food production deficit (Photo credit: Paul Pavelic, IWMI)."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0974419092.json b/main/part_2/0974419092.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d75cadc966fbdaa11ba2a3e3edfb1e0bea770760 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0974419092.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ad072c6b74f4a6af18611a0bf073cf58","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7ed1f609-b38f-4ac1-9ea7-a3ae7f020067/retrieve","id":"-1428647223"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"53568f48-9eec-4763-a15b-885696f7be31","content":"Meghdoot app has shown steady growth and expansion since the beginning. At the time of its launch, it provided agro-metrological advisories to only 150 districts in India. However, the Meghdoot app has expanded its reach to 717 districts in the country. This achievement comes along with the development of a multilingual strategy to cater to the non-Englishspeaking community in India and provide the information in 12 languages which includes Hindi, Telugu, Assamese, Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Odia, Tamil, Mizo, Bengali, and Punjabi, which has tremendously increased the reachability of the app. The app has also seen significant uptake with around 294,000 downloads and installations as of December 2023. This data underscores the significant advancement and widespread usefulness of Meghdoot in disseminating vital agro-meteorological advisories to farmers and stakeholders nationwide.Meghdoot app is evolving, and continuous upgrades and features are added periodically.Below are few of them:1. Offline mode: The app now features an enhanced offline mode which allows users to access downloaded advisories even when they are not connected to the internet. This feature ensures that the farmers in remote locations with limited internet connectivity can still benefit from the personalized crop advisories and weather information.The users will now receive push notifications as soon as a new crop advisory is added to the app for the selected locations. This alert system ensures that the farmers are updated on the latest information and can take timely action to protect their crops and optimize their yields.The app now includes seamless integration with social media platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp allowing users to easily share valuable information with their friends and peers.The Android version of the app has been upgraded to support the latest Android 13. This update ensures a smoother user experience for all Android users by bringing bug fixes and performance optimizations in addition to new features and improvements.To address the challenge of limited database storage and ensure timely updates of new advisories, a scheduler has been introduced. This scheduler automates the process of updating advisories in the app's database, ensuring that users always have access to the most current information without experiencing delays or interruptions.A visually engaging dashboard has been developed to provide AAS staff at IMD with insights into app usage and adoption at both the district and state levels. This comprehensive dashboard offers valuable analytics and data visualization tools, empowering policymakers, and stakeholders to make informed decisions and allocate resources effectively.To enhance the quality in terms of content and reduce the time required to develop crop advisories and weather summaries, we are exploring the utilization of OpenAI. A technical report on a pilot project has also been created. This pilot utilizes OpenAI architecture for natural language processing and a Random Forest regressor for predictions. A pilot study has been conducted at 3 locations in India and the results have been promising.Improvements are being explored in terms of adding new features to the Machine Learning (ML) model as well exploring the possibility to use techniques like noisy labels as well as the use of expert knowledge to improve the training data to improve the performance of ML models. A separate concept note has also been prepared to explore the potential funding from Government of India as well as through other donors is also being explored. Eventually, the objective is to expand this model to cover all locations and crops within the Meghdoot app."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0974526122.json b/main/part_2/0974526122.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c382b7db4e385ca9148079032b25030aba6ab467 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0974526122.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e81aaa750591fcc62939e659db7ad62e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9f4c24e4-70a9-459c-aafe-e6a018133dfa/retrieve","id":"2142453634"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b369c5ee-0d79-4266-9de3-e4ce40d723b2","content":"This Common Framework about Financing Rural Extension has been drawn up by an informal group of representatives of bilateral and multilateral cooperation agencies and institutions involved in agricultural development in the countries of sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere. The \"Neuchâtel Initiative Group\" was formed in 1995 and comprises representatives of the cooperation agencies of Austria, Denmark (Danida), France (MAE), Germany (GTZ), the Netherlands (DGIS), Sweden (Sida), Switzerland (SDC), UK (DFID) and the USA (USAID), as well as representatives of the FAO, the IFAD, the European Commission (EC/DGVIII), the CTA (Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation) and the World Bank.In a \"Common Framework on Agricultural Extension\" (1999), the Neuchâtel Group agreed on six principles and six commitments for reforming extension services to rural communities in developing countries. Later it was decided to carry out a more in-depth work on financing mechanisms to complement the common vision on rural extension. Results of different field studies done in Africa and Latin America have been discussed in the annual meeting of Neuchâtel Group in November 2000. Joint reflection then resulted in the elaboration of a draft version of this common framework on financing extension. This was discussed at the annual meeting of the Neuchâtel Group in November 2001, and issues and concerns raised were integrated into the present final document.This document takes into account not only the reform of national extension agencies but also the global context of the transformation of the rural services landscape. It offers some principles and options for innovative financing mechanism based on context-and policy-specific priorities. The new mechanisms aim at mobilising diverse sources of funds (private/public) and at improving governance of extension systems towards more demand orientation and pluralism. This framework is not a \"one size fits all\" set of recommendations. It should be used as a guideline for discussions and negotiations among the stakeholders involved in extension in the developing countries, in order to devise innovative and/or adequate schemes. This international point of view of decision-makers should also be the object of discussions and negotiations with the producers' organisations at the local level.A second document, \"Guide to Decision Making for Financing Extension\", complements this framework. It presents practical details and examples of innovative financing mechanisms.Unsatisfactory effectiveness and efficiency: Quality, effectiveness and efficiency of extension services are often questioned. Quality of services means that the extension organisation can readily identify, and respond to, the needs of users (farmers as well as other client and stakeholder groups), communicate well with users, and so be of maximum utility to users. However, whether extension is effective in bringing about real improvements in agricultural production and land use systems depends also on decisions made by users to effect changes at local, farm and even field level, and on a favourable policy environment. Good quality services are therefore a pre-condition for effectiveness, but quality alone cannot guarantee effectiveness. Efficiency requires extension services to achieve the objectives of quality and utility at reasonable cost, but many current extension systems do not encourage efficiency.Financial constraints: Currently by far the largest part of extension services for agriculture and natural resource management in developing countries is funded from public sources (this includes donor funds as well as public funds from the respective countries). This is the case for public extension services as well as for set-ups of NGOs and producer associations. Donors are no longer willing to bear the running cost of these organisations, and governments cannot afford to do so; consequently many extension organisations are far from being financially sustainable.In many developing countries policy changes which impact on the livelihood of rural people and the land use systems are underway. The role of the state is reconsidered. Decentralisation, liberalisation, privatisation and democratisation are key directions in this process. These policy changes influence agricultural extension.The financing of extension for agriculture and other areas of natural resource management is frequently discussed by development planners and practitioners in the South and the North due to a number of concerns, like unsatisfactory effectiveness, financial constraints and changing policies, in particular with respect to the role of the state.In the context of the concerns mentioned above, it is increasingly questioned whether it is justifiable to invest public resources in extension services. Some people view extension as serving the private interests of producers, and thus think that market forces regulate supply and demand for extension services satisfactorily. However, we consider that there are in many situations public interests related to agricultural extension which make public investment in extension -from donor as well as national sources -not only justifiable, but a necessity.Extension constitutes an important element of modern development strategies, that can bring about a substantial impact of government and donor engagements. The challenge, however, is to design useful and effective services, to invest public funds in the most helpful ways, and to mobilise private funds where desirable and justified.Well designed extension services contribute to improving agricultural production and land use systems, to reducing rural poverty 2 , and to fostering political and social stability by more equitable economic development, through:• accompanying the diversification of economic activities of rural households,• facilitating access to markets for farm products,• supporting the sustainable management of natural resources,• enhancing the management capacities of producers, rural communities and other agricultural sector players.In this way extension services help rural people to take advantage of opportunities, and thus contribute to livelihood security, while ensuring the conservation of the natural resource base 3 .Currently, extension systems are changing in many ways. This concerns organisational settings as well as the focus of the services. Previously the affair of national public institutions only, advisory services are now increasingly provided by a range of organisations (producer organisations, NGOs, private enterprises, central and decentralised public bodies), in diverse institutional and financial arrangements. National public extension organisations undergo reforms like decentralisation and privatisation. Often new local extension set-ups are built. The producers become clients, managers, owners or partners of the advisory services rather than mere beneficiaries. The involvement of producers in an extension set-up fosters quality and relevance. The services are more and more demand-oriented. Demands are not only voiced by producers, but in some instances also by other players in commodity chains. Moreover, consumers and the broader society raise demands related to the quality of farm products or ecologically sound management of natural resources.In this context new financing mechanisms and new set-ups for extension are experimented with. It is sought to achieve more sustainability by combining financial resources and competencies of various players (producers, Foto Helvetas private enterprises, local and national public bodies, donors and international public bodies). More emphasis is placed on involving private sector actors.One has to distinguish between who finances a service and who delivers it. It is well possible that public funds are used to finance services provided by private sector extension organisations, and public extension organisations can complement the public funds with private funds by asking for payment from the clients for specific services. In the case of private delivery, particular attention must be paid to the impartiality of the services which should be controlled by independent bodies.The primary purpose of this common framework for financing extension is not to conceive mechanisms which reduce public expenditure through cost recovery, but to design financing mechanisms in a way that:• guarantees effective and demand-oriented services,• empowers clients and other stakeholders, in particular those whose voices tend to be not heard,• invests public funds to secure public interests,• promotes a market of diverse providers in the extension service delivery landscape,• promotes environmentally sustainable land use practices,• contributes to better livelihood security for the poor and prevents marginalisation of vulnerable groups.Certainly the financing mechanisms alone cannot ensure better extension, but they are an important part of the design of extension systems, and they impact on the quality and the effectiveness of the services to a major degree.This framework attempts to outline the key points to take into consideration and to guide the decisions when designing financing mechanisms for extension set-ups.There are two distinct but interacting levels at which financing mechanisms need to be designed: the \"funding level\" and the \"service delivery\" level.The \"funding level\" is the level where decisions regarding the investment of public funds from international and national sources are taken, and where large amounts of funds are administered and allocated. It largely concernsThe following elements are combined to make up a financing mechanism.Involved actors. These can be grouped according to their roles. Note that the same actors can take on different roles, depending on the situation, often even at the same time.• Funding sources (national and international donors, national public bodies, local public bodies, but as well producers, producer associations and subsector organisations, private companies)• Extension service providers (public organisations, NGOs, producer organisations, sub-sector organisations, private companies)• Users or clients (producers and their organisations, sub-sector organisations, local communities)• Indirect beneficiaries (consumers, national public, international public)Flows of finance and services. Funds are moving between the involved actors in exchange for services and other actions. Mechanisms for the collection and allocation of funds are key issues in this respect.Attached to the flow of funds and services are usually rules and conditions governing how funding is to be obtained, how funds are to be used, and how involved actors and institutions relate to each other.Every extension set-up and thus every financing mechanisms is embedded in an environment which is shaped by policies, socio-economic and agrarian conditions, degree of producer organisation, capacity of extension service providers etc.interactions between donors, higher government levels and implementing agencies/programmes 4 .The \"service delivery level\" is the level of interaction between local implementers and administrators of funds, service providers and clients/users.This common framework focuses on the service delivery level. The funding level is addressed as far as it influences the service delivery level, but issues like the choice between budget and programme support by donors are not dealt with. In fact, funding level issues are largely not specifically related to extension, but to broader development financing.Principles for the financing of extension 1. Use financing mechanisms which promote empowermentThe link between financial participation and empowermentThe one who pays commands. This is also the case with extension services. Financing mechanisms are a powerful tool to promote empowerment of producers, their organisations and rural communities, if they are designed in an appropriate way.Participation of producers/users in financing extension, even to a modest extent, is essential if they are to be heard when they ask for good quality services responsive to their needs.Any extension service provider tends to seek the recognition of the actors by whom he/she gets paid, which is in many cases a donor, an NGO administration or a central government institution. If (part of) the payment comes from the users, then the service provider is compelled to seek 2In the left diagram payment comes only from a public funding source ➪ accountability is towards that source. In the right diagram clients contribute to paying for the services ➪ the extension organisation looks also towards the clients for recognition and can be held accountable by the clients.recognition from that side, in particular if a substantial part of the payment depends on user satisfaction with the services delivered. This means that with financial participation the service providers are not only accountable to their main source of funds but also to their clients.With the legitimation of their financial participation producers can define the contents of extension services, appraise the quality of services, and sanction advisers. Practically this can be achieved by involvement of the users in the governance of the extension organisation (e.g. in producer organisations' own extension services or through representation of producers on supervisory boards), but also by fostering competition between different service providers among which the clients can choose.The principle of financial participation can easily be put into practice with farmers who are to some extent involved in market production, and live in economically dynamic areas. But financial participation can also be implemented in more remote areas and/or for more vulnerable groups.Usually farmers -also poor ones -are willing to pay for extension services, if they are sure to obtain an added value which exceeds the cost, within a reasonable period of time.It is the farmer's perception of value and cost which is relevant for the willingness to pay and not the more obvious monetary facts, or the public or private nature of services. Willingness to pay is strengthened when producers perceive to be in control of the services, when the payment arrangements have been negotiated and are transparent, and when the services to be paid for are attractive and more profitable compared to the usual free services.Farmers' willingness to pay differs between different kinds of services. Willingness to pay is usually greater for tangible services and services related to cash crops, and rather lower for facilitation or longer-term knowledge generation.Payment for services by the clients not only empowers the clients, but also the service providers who gain professional status by having something valuable to offer to their clients.There are different ways in which the financial participation of users can be organised:• direct payment for services,• indirect payment through membership fees of producer organisations,• indirect payment via levies on produce processed or marketed e.g. by a sub-sector organisation or a private company,• out of tax revenues raised from agricultural produce, such as export taxes and octroi taxes (i.e. local taxes on the movement of produce).The concept of hot and cold money is helpful in explaining the relation between the organisation of financial participation and empowerment. The notion refers on the one hand to the origin of funds (the more directly the payment comes out of the pockets of individuals the hotter it feels), and on the other hand it reflects the feeling of ownership.With hot money users perceive their financial participation as direct and real payment for services. The perception of hot money is achieved best with direct cash payment for services. If there is transparency and awareness, indirect payment through membership fees in producer organisations and levies on products are also perceived as hot money.External funds (foreign aid, general tax money) are often perceived as cold. For instance, users perceive the funds of centralised public extension set-ups usually as fairly cold.Financing mechanisms can foster processes of warming up money, for instance when users are really involved in the governance of service delivery institutions that are financed by levies on produce. But financing mechanisms can also cool down money, for example when membership fees or direct contributions of users are mixed in a global budget, or when the service delivery institution has no functioning accountability mechanisms.In many cases only partial financial participation of clients is practical and desirable. A major part of the service cost is still financed from public sources (donor countries, international donors, national and local government budgets). In such a situation the financing mechanisms can be designed to promote empowerment as well, if the public fund share is not paid directly to the supplier of services, but transferred to the users who then pay the extension organisation with this money. Such mechanisms are called demand-side financing (because the public funds are channelled via the demand-side) or transfer-of-purchasing-power mechanisms (because funds to purchase services are transferred to clients who would otherwise not have sufficient purchasing power to use them).Public funds can also be channelled via the demand-side if funds from further private sources like processing or commodity export enterprises are involved. This strengthens the farmers position vis-à-vis those powerful players.Ownership empowers: extension services provided by producer organisationsIn the case of extension services belonging to producer organisations, the empowerment potential is particularly strong because member farmers are not only clients but the real owners of the service, and have maximum control over services and service providers. This remains the case also when a large share of donor or public funding is involved. Participatory and democratic functioning of producer organisations is a crucial factor for realising the empowerment potential of ownership of services. Control of the producer organisation and the extension service by a few influential and better-off members is a threat to such systems. Experience shows that such a governance drift is common.Foto Brigitta Stillhardt, CDE, Bern, SwitzerlandThis principle implies a) that funds from different sources of finance need to be combined, and b) that it needs to be determined which actors derive benefits from a service, directly and indirectly, and on this basis the financial contribution of each benefiting actor is negotiated. The outcome of such negotiation processes can only partly be based on technical considerations, and political considerations are likely to play a major role.There are diverse sources of funds which can be mobilised to finance extension. These sources coincide with the actors concerned with extension and can be grouped largely into private and public. It is necessary to combine different sources of funds and capture more of the available private sources. This has the advantages a) that the national and international public funds can concentrate on financing services to which a high degree of public interest is attached, and b) that free (i.e. publicly funded) services for private interests are avoided (provided that the system functions transparently and without corruption).It is important to recognise that a certain level of public funding for extension will always be necessary if public interests around extension are to be taken care of. Even in the highly commercialised agriculture of industrialised countries only a varying portion of the cost of extension are borne by farmers. In addition, the farmers of industrialised countries continue to enjoy comfortable subsidy levels of which poor farmers in developing countries cannot even dream.The table below gives an overview of the players which can act as sources of funds and different modes to collect the funds:In many cases not only the immediate client of an extension service benefits from it. Other, more indirect benefits may result:• consumers benefit if producers use pesticides correctly,• a whole community benefits if pastures are not overgrazed,• a micro-finance institution benefits if its clients make profit from the businesses for which they take loans,• a processing firm benefits if farmers deliver good quality produce,• a country benefits if farmers produce commodities for export,• the society of a whole country or even the international community benefits if more poor farmers earn a decent living,• and the international community benefits if biodiversity is preserved.Thus, often several stakeholders -from individuals, families and local communities to the national and global public -benefit to some extent from the same extension service. All those who benefit from a service should participate in financing it. Which player finances what share in a service must be negotiated. The basis for negotiation is the extent to which a player benefits from a service. It may also be negotiated at which level the public interest is located: whether it is (e.g.) at a local level or at the national or international level.Contributions to the cost of the service should then be made from the appropriate level. In some cases, for instance in services for natural resource management, local, national and international interests can be closely linked: here a contribution made up of funds from different sources would be required.Services which result directly in increased profits of farm households (with the exception of very poor households) are largely in the private interest of the concerned household. Among these would be e.g.• training in the production of commercial crops,• assistance in the elaboration of a business plan to obtain credit,• vaccination of livestock.Services which generate both, benefits in terms of profit for individual farm households and benefits for a broader public, are of mixed interest, e.g.• training and coaching in the production of commercial crops for very poor farm households,• promoting market integration of remote areas,• vaccination of livestock against highly contagious diseases,• economic and marketing innovations, and new forms of organisation etc.,• production increases for export crops which are taxed and thus contribute to fiscal resources of a country.Services which result mainly in benefits for a broader public (nationally or internationally) are e.g.• promotion of sound pesticide use (reducing water pollution, pesticide residues in crops),• facilitating conservation of biodiversity or forest resources,• production increases in staple crops for national or global food security.If the relevant level does not have the necessary funds, a solution consistent with the principle of empowerment enunciated above, would be for the external provider of funds to channel money to the demand-side, i.e. to the body representing the public at the respective level (e.g. community organisations, local government councils), rather than directly to a service provider) and for that body to then pay the service provider(s).The degree of financial participation of users. The share of cost to be paid by the clients must be determined in a transparent way, by negotiation, and should not be imposed arbitrarily. It should be based on the actual cost, the value which users attach to a service, the actual benefits, and the degree of public interest in that service.Financial participation of other stakeholders. If there are other stakeholders who benefit, they should contribute to financing the respective service in accordance with the level of benefit.Financial participation, demand-side financing, and different forms of private extension services all tend to encourage the provision of services that result in quick economic benefits to the clients and, in the case of private commercial firms, in higher profits to the service providers. Services with a longer-term perspective, for poor client segments and disadvantaged areas, and services that promote ecologically sound practices do not fall into this category. Therefore when introducing empowering financing mechanisms, the representatives of public interests must keep a watchful eye on the effects of the new financing mechanisms and pay special attention that their public interests are taken care of.It is sometimes questioned whether poor and vulnerable groups benefit from extension services at all. In general it can be said that they can benefit in many ways provided that the services offered take into account their particular needs and constraints. E.g. training women in vegetable growing has improved the nutritional status of many children in Bangladesh, training farm labourers in specific skills can help them to secure higher wages.The introduction of financial participation raises the complex issue of access to extension services of poor and vulnerable groups and in remote, low-potential areas. In societies and states which consider equitable opportunities and the reduction of regional imbalances a goal and thus a public interest, it is justified to finance a major part of the cost of extension for disadvantaged groups and regions with public funds. They should be preferably channelled via the demand-side.Financing extension in disadvantaged areas may require broad public funding, whereas in more dynamic regions the public funding can be targeted specifically to the disadvantaged groups. This requires that the poor and vulnerable groups are identified and strengthened in their capacity to formulate demands and negotiate the services they need.It is often said that poor people cannot pay for extension services. However, experience in different places shows that for services which are truly and obviously useful, poor and vulnerable people are willing and able to pay a certain amount in many cases. The empowering effect of financial participation is so great that it is worth to apply it also in case of poor and vulnerable groups.The arrangements and the degree of financial participation have to be adapted to the capacity of these client groups. Payment for services deferred until harvest time, payment in kind, or payment in instalments, or group services to spread costs are options which help to ensure that the cost of extension does not lead to increased vulnerability or deter disadvantaged people from using services. Within set-ups of producers or sub-sector organisations financial participation indexed according to the volume of produce or landholding size is an option to distribute cost in an equitable manner among producers of different economic size.On the other hand the designers of financing mechanisms have to be aware that financial participation may exclude certain poor people from access to extension services, and that financial participation for extension can compete with increased financial participation in other services like health and education. Specific measures to mitigate negative effects of financial participation on disadvantaged groups may need to be designed.Linking new financing mechanisms and poverty reduction requires redistribution of resources from better-off sub-sectors, regions and categories of producers to disadvantaged ones, not only within the agricultural sector but also from other sectors to the agricultural sector. Such redistribution can take place only with the support of a state concerned with equitable opportunities.The new financing mechanisms which favour services with quick economic benefits bring about the risk that the promoted practices are ecologically and economically not sustainable. There should be a local, national and international public interest that farming and natural resource management practices are sustainable in the long run, i.e. that they do not deplete the resource base. Therefore, when introducing new financing mechanisms, Foto B. Minder, Switzerland measures should be taken to counteract this tendency. This may happen through legislative means and their enforcement by impartial bodies, and by publicly funding services which promote sustainable practices, and increase knowledge and awareness about ecological problems.Paying farmers for actions contributing to ecological sustainability which benefit their local or the global community (environmental services) is a very effective means to support farmers in marginal areas, and to foster their self-esteem as providers of environmental services to the wider society. Such services may for instance be soil conservation measures on slopes to prevent silting of downhill water supply schemes, or giving up logging and hunting in a protected forest area to conserve biodiversity.Some important financing mechanisms and situations in which they are feasible are presented in the following. Note that in practice, often different financing mechanisms are to be combined 5 .This form of payment is suitable for services that are mainly in the private interest of the user. The service provider can be from the private sector or a public extension organisation. The users are very much in the role of clients. Direct payment for services, even if it covers only part of the actual cost, strongly fosters accountability of service providers to the users, since no user will pay for bad services.Individual advice may be too costly for individual producers, in particular if the payment is supposed to be a major part of the extensionists' income. Cost spreading mechanisms, e.g. group extension events or training courses, are a way to reduce cost for the individual and at the same time allow reasonable cost recovery.It is acceptable that the payment for services does cover only part of the actual cost when there is a certain degree of public interest in the service.Foto SDC However, if the service is purely in the private interest, then too low prices mean unfair competition with private sector service providers which are not publicly subsidised.Members of producer or sub-sector organisations pay an annual membership contribution. These funds are used to finance the operation of the organisation. Extension and advisory services may be included in their services to members. Financing through member contributions promotes real ownership, provided that the organisation functions in a democratic and transparent manner.The strength of extension arrangements of producer and sub-sector organisations is that they can really represent the interests of producers and other sub-sector players. However, they are bound to neglect public interests where they do not coincide with the interests of the members. Therefore, if such arrangements are funded partially with public funds, the representatives of the public interest have to pay attention that the extension set-up remains accountable to the public to a reasonable extent. This is achieved by attaching adequate conditions to funding.Financing through levies means that the cost for extension are deducted from the price which the farmers get for their produce.Levy financing is possible for any organisation or enterprise which markets or processes farm products, e.g. producer organisations, processing companies, contract farming arrangements etc. A pre-condition for such an arrangement is that all the produce passes through a bottleneck somewhere along the commodity chain where the levy can be collected.Levy systems are sometimes operated purposefully in an obscure manner, which makes producers feel exploited. A transparent levy system where farmers are well aware of what they pay is empowering. Well organised farmers have better chances to ensure fair levy arrangements than small scattered contract growers of a large agroindustrial company.The choice of the institution (a producer organisation, a private company or a para-statal body) responsible for managing the levy system can strongly influence the confidence of the producers in the setting and their perception about the quality of its functioning.Levies on produce are usually used to finance extension around the product for which they are collected. However, levies can be also redirected to less favoured sub-sectors and regions to finance extension activities there. For instance levied funds may be directed towards an agricultural development fund. In this way levies become a tool that allows redistribution of resources towards more equity.Export taxes, trade or road taxes collected by a public body can be earmarked for the financing of extension. Such a system needs to be transparent if producers are to appreciate that they in fact finance extension and have the right to have a voice. Of course, earmarked taxes can be used as a redistribution mechanism in the same way as levies.A government contracts extension organisations and mandates these to offer specified services to a specified clientele (this may be a specific area or a specific population segment). Such service mandates are usually concluded with private organisations -forprofit enterprises, NGOs, producer associations or community-based organisations. Service mandates are also possible between the public administration and independently operating public extension organisations, e.g. in decentralised settings. Service mandates allow the use of public funds for services in the public interest (e.g. the promotion of environmentally sustainable practices, poverty reducing activities) without maintaining a public delivery system. They also can promote more effectiveness and efficiency of public extension organisations.Service mandates are particularly suitable for services with a relatively high degree of public interest. For services with a high degree of private interest a financial contribution of the clients needs to be included. With service mandates, like with any contracts between public institutions and the private sector, the risk of corruption is a concern.Demand-side financing (channelling public extension funds via the users) fosters demand-orientation and effectiveness. It is appropriate in the case of services with a rather high degree of private interest in addition to the public interest involved, like for instance production or marketing advice for poor farmers. It has an empowering effect on the clients and ensures accountability of extensionists to producers. It has little distorting effects on market relations, and on financial relations between farmers and extensionists.There is no crowding out of potential private commercial suppliers, and the development of a market for extension services is promoted.Demand-side financing must include some financial participation and have a good control system in order to motivate for effective use of the funds and minimise corruption incentives.Certain issues have so far limited the use of demand-side financing:• As the funds must be distributed to a vast number of places, the administration and control of such systems is fairly complex. It is much easier to channel donor funds to one or two rural development NGOs and control their use, than to several dozen local level organisations.• Along with the purchasing power, other powers are also transferred to producers, and donors as well as governments may feel uncomfortable with the loss of control associated with demand-side financing.There are different mechanisms to put demand-side financing into practice.The most important ones are demand-side grants and voucher systems.Demand-side grants. Producers or their organisations conclude a contract with a source of public funds for the financing of specific services and activities. With the funds the producers then purchase the services of an extension organisation to get professional support. It is also possible that the extension organisation and the producers jointly elaborate a project and then apply for funding. Agricultural extension or development funds, for example, usually operate in this way.Voucher systems. Vouchers are another way to put the concept of demand-side financing into practice. The clients obtain vouchers from the public funding source which entitles them to specified extension services from an extension organisation. They pay with the voucher for the services obtained. After service delivery the extensionist submits the voucher to the government and gets paid. Often the admissible extension organisations are shortlisted or licensed.Empowering financing mechanisms can only unfold their potential if producers can articulate their service requirements and if extension service providers are able to offer services answering these requirements precisely. These capacities are in many places insufficient. Thus new empowering financing mechanisms must often be accompanied by substantial investments in capacity building among the producers, their organisations, the extensionists and the extension organisations, as well as the supervisory and regulatory government institutions.Well organised producers and rural communities are in a better position for negotiations with government and other relevant players. Rural development activities are facilitated if they can be implemented in partnership with capable local organisations, and with democratic local governing structures. This requires producer organisations with good organisational and management skills, which are able to gain access to useful information and knowledge.Foto HelvetasThus, governments and donors should invest in training and capacity building of producer organisations and support for local democratic processes.More generally, efforts are needed to improve the dialogue among actors. Such efforts are often underfunded, even though they are crucially important. They include e.g. strengthening of farmers' capacities to formulate demands vis-à-vis extension organisations, and to lobby for favourable policies and regulations vis-à-vis higher level decision makers.Mutual trust is a condition for successful collaboration between donors and producer organisations. If donor funds are channelled through institutions in which the producers have little trust, the trust in the donor agency is at stake. Therefore donors must choose an implementing agency for their programmes which is generally trusted by farmers.Innovative financing mechanisms can achieve their objectives only if there is a sufficient number of competent and self-confident extension service providers available. They must be able to understand the farmers' realities and requirements well, and have the competence to design and offer services that respond precisely to these requirements. With increasing market integration, also of small farmers, extensionists require more and more competencies beyond production technology, e.g. in marketing, organisational development, environmental issues, process facilitation and coaching. The diversity of contexts, services and organisational forms demands that the pluralism in extension service providers must be accompanied by pluralistic financing mechanisms. However, although the financing mechanisms operating in a location may be diverse, they should be compatible with each other, in order not to sabotage the functioning of some of them. Donors often finance functions and activities for limited time, after which the financial responsibility is handed over to government or other local institutions which are then often unable to carry on with the funding. This threatens the sustainability of the changes achieved by interventions.Donors should therefore fund functions:• which are needed only for a certain period of time. During an intervention many functions are carried out that help to change things, which do not need to be performed anymore once changes have been achieved.• whose longer-term financing from local sources is secured. Various experiences show that it is very unlikely that functions which have been introduced with subsidies continue to be performed once subsidies are stopped. Generally the respective activities just disappear.• which are intended to show new ways of doing things (pilot activities). In this case donors have to bear in mind the fact that their initiatives may not be adopted by the local decision makers.• in which there is a long-term interest on the side of the donor or the international public. In such cases long-term funding commitments from donors are necessary, and there is no point in insisting to hand over the financial responsibility to national and local actors.Functions which are to be funded from national or local public or private sources must be financed by the respective source as soon as they are beyond an experimental stage. Otherwise, it is likely that they will never be financed by these sources!Changes in systems require a higher level of financial resources during the transition period. For successful changes it is necessary to invest in slow transition processes which allow for an adaptation of approaches to local conditions. Building demand-driven, financially viable extension systems requires iterative learning and change processes. Also scaling-up of successful extension approaches needs the replication of learning processes rather than just replication of the set-up. These change processes need competent process coaching and methodological assistance. Once the transition is complete the level of funds required goes down to normal. Therefore, transition processes lend themselves for donor funding.Foto SDCInvesting in extension alone -even if optimally adapted to the needs of the clients -is not enough. Extension cannot be effective unless a set of frame conditions is in place:• international and national policies which impact on agriculture and land use systems must be adequate,• a research system which is able to facilitate the development of adapted innovations must operate,• producers must have access to means of production and markets,• adequate education opportunities for future agricultural professionals as well as producers are necessary.Where these frame conditions are not met, public investment to enhance them needs to complement investments in extension. In some situations, a sector-wide approach may be useful for guiding and co-ordinating donor and in-country public investment, not only for extension but for all relevant sector functions. Through a series of case studies and joint reflections, this 'Neuchâtel Initiative Group' is helping to bring a measure of convergence to thinking on the objectives, methods and means of support for agricultural extension policies."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0977440430.json b/main/part_2/0977440430.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b21c8aa043e019b8263e9a425cfff9ecb1af4cfc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0977440430.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"fe3b226fcf5aa4c29b0e355ab0a34380","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f6800e1e-775a-4abc-8898-082626539b46/retrieve","id":"-284059278"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3800c5fc-6992-4dc6-9c44-b29d1436c876","content":"Swee/-Po/ato Variety Selee/ion in Garu/, West Java, indonesia Pipombi (WO 1 098) was chosen with eight flags because the size is uniform, il has smooth skin color, and it can be sold fresh. Farmer Eneek will be responsible for multiplying Ihis sweet pOlato as a souree of planting material.The importance of agroecological dornams can be found in earlier work on defining and delineating . recornrnendation dornains (RDs), whích is c10sely associated with the farrning systerns research of the late 1970s (Wotowiec, Poats, and Hildebrand 1986). Initial work on RDs concentrated on a few relatively easily identifiable factors (bíological variables), such as land and soil types, agro ecological zones, and erop types and rnanagernent (Harrington and Tripp 1985). The exercise on RD was híghly complex sinee the process was to identify farrning households, based on the sirnilarity in their practiees, rather than farrns. But the delineation of agroecological domains was rnueh less eumbersorne with rice because rice is very sensitive to changes in agroecological conditions and its adaptation is Iirnited, as compared lo sorne other crops such as maíze. Moreover, rice is the rnost important cereal crop in the regíon, so farrners have an in-depth knowledge ofrice-growing environrnents and varieties suitable to different agroecological dornains.The current endeavor on refining the definition of agroecological dornaíns for rice in parts ofNepal is the case of\"sharpening the focus\" fur better targeting of participatory plant breeding (PPB) work, including diversity deployrnent, eonservation of landraees in different dornains, and planning strategic erop rnanagement research. The methodology adopted is quite simple and can be replícated in other areas for wider use by the researchers and deve10pment workers. Field exercises for delineating agroecological domains have largely been influenced by the methodologies on RDs advocated by Collinson (1980), Franzel (1985), and Vaidya and Floyd (1997).Ihey emphasized the use of secondary sources of information, followed by preliminary surveys supplemented later by a formal survey lo refine the domains. However, later views on the subject hold lha! the refining process should take place only after researchers have a clear understanding of the variabílity inherent in the local farming systems (Cornick and Alberti 1985). The current study embodies the thoughts from both the methodologies for delineating domains and associated rice landraces/varieties.In the process of delineating agroecological domains, two group meetings were organized in the Kachorwa and Begnas eco-sítes. The first meeting was held with field-based staff; the second, with farmers from the project area. Ihis was followed by a transect walk by researchers and farmer representatives lo jointly validate farmers' statements. Ihe exercise took about two days, including field visits in each site.Sínce field-based staff are stationed in villages, it was expected !hat they would have a fairly good understanding of the agroecological domains and the farming systems of their respective eco-siles.Hence, the first level of group discussions was organized in field offices, with the field officer, technical assistants, and motivators part.icipating.Afier discussions, the participants were able to come up with four major agroecological domains, mainly defined on the basís of water regímes. They also broadly classified the soíl type and fertility status of soils from each domaín, based on scientific knowledge of soil classification and characterization. Participanls were also asked to estímate the size of each domain and place different landraces/varieties in their right domains. Estimating tbe relative size of each domain was straíghtforward because tbe pok:harilman occupied only a limited area within the eco-site. But placing each landrace/variety in its right domain proved more difficult. The team could place tbe majority of landraces/varieties in their domains, but the number of landraces/varielies per eco-síte was too large for them to rernember aH the names and tbeir right enviromnents. The process was also complicated by the fact lhal sorne of the landraces/varieties are grown in more than one domain.The whole process was reviewed by the participants, and once they were satisfied with the sleps and outputs, the field officer was asked lo facilitate tbe same process for tbe farmers' group discussion.A group discussion was held with farmers witb the specific objective of delineating agroecological domains. Fíeld officers/sile coordinators facilitated the discussion and tbe whole exercise was repeated witb farmers' groups. Both female and male farmers participated in the discussion and put forward tbeir opinions.Farmers identified four agroecological domains within the eco-site (ucha, samta/, nichaJkhalar, and pokharllman), based on the major criteria of moisture regime and fertility status/gradient (tables 1 and 2). They could easily identifY the relative size of each domain, but there were disagreements among about soil c1assification. Perhaps this reflected the variability of the soíl types and soil fertility slatus in each domain. Placing landraces/variety in the domains initiated a lively debate among the members. However, they were able lO agree upon the major domains for each landrace/variety. They also reported that sorne oflhe landraceslvarieties were grown in more than one domain but Ihe cases were limited.In Kachorwa, of Ihe four domains identified by the farmers, two--ucha and pokharí/man-were extreme cases (dry land and rainfed; wet-Iand conditions, respectively). No modem varieties were grown in Ihese areas. Only landraces were found growing under such conditions, and the number of landraces (cultivars) was relatively small compared to other domains. Samtal and nícha represented better growing environments, wilh a grea!er number of landraces and modem varieties growing Ihere. Samtal represented Ihe major domain in terms of area. There was considerable area under uccha bu! no! much area was under nicha and pokahri. Severallandraces and modem varieties (MVs) were common lo both samtal and nicha. These two domains were more productive in terms of crop production as well.Similar results were found when Ihe exercise was repeated in Ihe Begnas eco-site under mid-hill conditions. However, Ihe domain delineation was less c1ear-cut Ihan ít was in Kachorwa because several of Ihe landraces and MV s were found in more than one dornain. Here again, landraceslvarieties were no! repeated in more than two dornains, and lha! in adjacent domains only. Jumping of domains by certain landraces/varieties was not observed in eilher of Ihe exercises. Allhough several ofthe landraces and MV s were found in two domains, Iheir performance was judged as best only in one domain. Based on Ihe information generated from Ihe discussion wilh farmers, it could be deduced that a landrace/variety fits best only in one domain. It exists in olher domains because Ihere ls no competitive variety to replace it.Having achieved a high degree of agreement between farmers and researchers in Ihe defmition of agroecological domains, it was decided to field-verif)' the definitions through a transect walk and to look for consistency in Ihe field implementation. A representative group offarmers made a transect walk of Ihe eco-site along wilh researchers. They identified domains and located landraces/varieties on different farms. The exercise helped in relating different agroecological domains and Iheir characteristics with Ihé landraceslvarieties being grown Ihere. Thus, Ihis exercise needs to be conducted when the rice crop ls mature or when Ihe crop is standing in Ihe field.Based on the analysis oflhe characteristics of different agroecological domains and Ihe distribution oflandraces/varieties within domains, an attempt lo develop a conceptual model of agroecological domains for rice was made (figure 1). In Ihe following subsections, Ihe characteristíc features of the domains have been explained. Nevertheless, Ihe model needs verification in a larger context and further refinement for wider applicability.Local farmers can provide very reliable inforrnation on Ihe agroecological domains for rice. Similarly, farmers can provide detailed features of each domain in terms of soíl type, drainage, fertility status, production potential, cropping patterns, and so on.The size of agroecological domains varies, with more extreme environments (domains) being relatively smaller as compared to more favorable ones. This follows normal distribution curve. How- Doma!n 4 ever, depending upon fue geographic location (high-potential production systems or marginal growing envíronrnents), the size of each domain will vary. For instance, in marginal environrnents for rice, fue extreme domain will be relatively larger as compared to ofuer domains; whereas, in favorable environrnents, the míddle domains will be relatively larger.Until fue distribution oflandráces/varieties across domains, the features of domains, and fue traits of cultivars are analyzed, one cannot appreciate fue complexity of farroers' strategies to manage plant genetic resourees to meet fueir multiple needs. From the analysis, it is apparent that one landrace/variety is best suited or most competitive in only one domain, though farroers might grow the same cultivar in more fuan one domain. This implies that fue cultivar competes wifu ofuer cultivars trom within the domain, and that there is less competition between cultivars across domains, except when fuere is an overlap of cultivars. Overlap signifies the presence of transitional zones between dornains, which explains fue presence of landraceslvarieties in two different but adjacent dornains. Within dornajns, fue area and number of households growing different landraceslvarieties is explained by rnarket forces, farrocrs' socioeconomic status, cultural factors, preferences for specific traits, and ofuer abiotic and biotjc factors.Alfuough landrsces/varieties rnay overlap in adjacent dornains, no case was registered where a landrsce/variety was found in more fuan two dornajns. This suggests fuat landraces/varietíes have very specific adaptatíons. In ofuer words, it reinforces fue idea that a cultivar is most cornpetítive in only one dornaín.Landraceslvanetíes falling wíthin the sarue domaín are more likely to be similar in their genetic cornposition as cornpared to landraces/varietíes frorn dissimilar dornains. The logic behind is that they have been put under similar managernent condítions have been selected over time fo! adaptation. However, this hypolhesis needs lo be proved from laboratory analysis of sorne of the saruples frorn each domaín. If it proves tme, then there ís a strong case, from a conservation point ofview, for disaggregating genetic materials across agroecologícal domains. Nevertheless, this process still holds true where diversity deployrnent is the prime objective of the project.The distribution oflandraces/vaneties in different domains is the result of farmers' experimentation with those landraces/vaneties over years. In other words, they are the \"best fit\" under farmers' rnanagement conditions. Therefore, researchers definítely need to know the characteristics of each dornain, as well as the specific traits of the landraces/vaneties in each domain and their distribution across dornains in order to make any intervention in the present system. The anaIysis of agroecological domains is worth the money and time invested in collecting and analyzing the information.Planning conservation strategies for landraces ldentifYing landraees that are grown in small areas by a limited number of farrners and devising ways and rneans of conserving them might seem to be a straightforward task for conserving endangered landraces. Sornetirnes, weighted diversity, as well, might be computed for facilitating Ihe decision-makíng process in choosing which landraces to focus on for conservation when there are numerous landraces falling in the endangered category. However, all these processes and steps consider the diversity oflandraces at the aggregatedllandscape (cornmuníty) level and thus ignore the influence of agroecological domains in deterrniníng the position oflandraees in different dornains.The need for micro-Ievel analysis emerges from the faet that landraces are conditioned over years by their continued growth and selection over time in specific dornains. As a result, Ihey have developed adaptive traits, wruch are uníque 10 landraces falling in that domain. Therefore, analysis of landrace diversity at the aggregated level fails 10 appreciate the position oflandraces in specifie dornains, which in faet might be harboring genes of irnportanl traits. Selecting landraces frorn an aggregated list rnight exclude, certaÍn strategically important landraces from conservation.PPB has been used as one rneans 10 conserve useful genes in landraces through crossing with modem vaneties. However, there could be number of landraces withín a domain that might require sorne forrn of conservation (through breeding and nonbreeding means). Understanding Ihe features of domains and the distribution oflandraces in them will facilitate decision rnakíng about selecting landraces for conservation. Failing to do this could result in selecting landraces with similar genetic traits for conservation (vía PPB) from jusI one or two domaÍns. This would lead lo the neglect of sorne and overrepresentation of olhers.Diversity deployrnenl in simple terrn means \"províding farmers wilh options of genetie materials 10 choose frorn.\" The introduction ofnew genetic material results in temporal disequilibrium because of competition between existing and new genetic material. The competition is for space in farmers' fields, for farm labor, for capital inputs, and so on. As time elapses, Ihe new entrant finds its rightful"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/0987463251.json b/main/part_2/0987463251.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abc7effbd6db0e4c0d50b7cbdbebec4cbea3ba22 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/0987463251.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ed6a92c0a11b2d9b92fb39ba3e0e293d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e7703501-c582-4e66-8000-aeb21bb32650/retrieve","id":"-451994897"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"55f05e2f-c73d-4493-b134-0efa460c47b3","content":"El arroz es 1..n rubro prioritario en Panamá si se toma en cuenta que este cereal es el de más alto consumo por parte de la población tanto urbana como rural, situación que ha dado lugar a que ocupe el primer lugar en lo que a superficie ser-brada y volúmenes de producción se refiere, as! como en el monto de inversiones que se hacen para su cultivo, beneficio y comercialización dentro del sector agropecuario. El arroz representa la principal fuente de calorías (33% del total) y proteína (24%) en la dieta panameña Algunos de panamei\"a son los los aspectos que caracterizan a la producción arrocera siguientes (a) se siembran anualmente poco má' de 100 000 hectáreas, (b) más o menos en la mitac de la superficie sembraca se siguen métodos de cultivo mecanizado, pero de este tipo de explotaciones se obtiene más del 85% de ls producción nacional, (e) más del 90% de la superficie sembrada se ubica en el ecosistema de secano aunque las explotaciones bajo riego se han incrementado en los últimos años, (d) en la actualidad el pab es autosuficiente en arroz, pero debido a que los costos de producción son al tos, los precios pagados por el corsumidor también son altos en relación al precio internacional y se dificulta e 2500 mm in the humid zones. Annual evaporation exceeds the amount of rainfall in all the zones except in the humid zone where rainfall is higher than evaporation. Annual evapotranspiration is higher in the very arid zones (2100 -2500 mm) than in the humid zone (1200 -2000 mm) (KARI, 2001). The altitude ranges from sea level in the eastern side to over 5000 m above sea level with the highest altitude in Mount Kenya.The arid and semi-arid lands (ASAL) constitute 83% of the total land area while the rest is made up of the humid and sub-humid zones. The humid zones are mainly located in the highlands east and west of Rift Valley while the sub-humid comprises the Lake Victoria region, coastal lowlands and part of western Kenya. Due to high rainfall, (1000-2700 mm) the humid and subhumid zones are regarded as medium to high potential for crop production. Dairy cattle and other livestock farming account for utilization of 30% of the land in the humid and sub-humid zones (KARI, 2001). Rainfall in the ASAL is low (annual rainfall, 150 -900 mm) and erratic with a large part of the year being dry. Consequently, these areas have marginal to low potential for crop production. Nevertheless, livestock thrive in these zones and are important source of livelihoods. In 2009 census, the total population of ruminants (cattle, sheep, goats, camels and donkeys) stood at about 67 million (KNBS, 2010) with about 60% of all these livestock being in the ASALs. The sub-sector utilises about 81% of the ASALs, employs 90% of the 7 million inhabitants and contributes 95% of the family income and livelihood security. About 80% of the farming communities are smallholders, predominantly practising mixed crop-livestock farming, with livestock and crop production being an integral component of the sustainable system. The farming communities selected in the regions represented the mixed crop-livestock production system in Kenya. Livestock production is constrained by inadequate quantity and quality of feeds and thus integrating of Brachiaria grasses is likely to bridge this gap, improve ruminant livestock productivity and livelihoods. The focus of this paper is to provide background information on biophysical environment and farming systems of four regions where research on Brachiaria grasses was conducted. The regions targeted for integrating Brachiaria grass cultivars were; the coastal lowlands, mid-altitude eastern region, central highlands and north western highlands of Kenya (Figure 2). The coastal lowlands (CL), that extends for about 30 km into the hinterland from sea is divided into five AEZ; CL2, CL3, CL4, CL5 and CL6 based on rainfall (Jaetzold et al., 2006). The annual rainfall ranges from 700 mm in CL6 to 1200 mm in CL3, with a bimodal pattern, the long rains season occurring from April to June and the short rains from October to December (Figure 3).Potential evapo-transpiration ranges from 1900 to 2300 mm per annum and exceeds annual precipitation, thus resulting in water deficit. Mean annual temperature ranges from 22 to 35 o C and relative humidity from 70 to 90%.The topography is low lying, from the sea level on the eastern side, rising to 300 m asl toward the hinterland on the western side. The Coastal plain, the foot plateau to the north, the Coastal Range and the Nyika Plateau are some of the key physical features dotting the region. Major soils include Ferralsols which are sandy clay, strongly weathered and red brown in colour, and Cambisols, which are shallow to moderately deep. They are deficient in nitrogen (N); phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) with soil P being below the critical level of 20 ppm (Njarui and Mureithi, 2004).Typically the mid-altitude eastern region is semi-arid and the mean annual rainfall is around 700 mm but in the hill masses it increases to about 1050 mm in the hill masses. The rainfall is bimodal with two distinct rainy seasons; the long rains occurring from March to May and short rains from October to December (Figure 3). Annual evapo-transpiration exceeds the amount of rainfall and ranges from 1200 to 1800 mm (KARI, 2001). Minimum mean annual temperature vary from 14 to 22 o C while maximum mean annual temperature vary from 26 to 34 o C.The region is characterized by low to medium altitude, rising from 800 to1800 m asl. The soils are derived from the pre-Cambrian 'basement-complex' rocks consisting of mainly granites, gneisses and sometimes schist's sandstones or phyllitic shales (Simpson et al., 1996). They are often shallow and contain low organic matter and high sand content (Kusewa and Guiragossian, 1989). The predominant soils are Luvisols, Acrisols and Ferralsols. Numerous other soil types occur but are of less significance in terms of the agricultural area they occupy.The central highlands also receive bi-modal rainfall, the long rains occurring from March to May with a maximum annual rainfall of 1600 mm and the short rains from September to December with annual rainfall of 700 mm (Figure 3). Temperature ranges from as low as 2°C to a maximum of 25°C. Night frosts are common in AEZ of Afro-Alpine highlands and Upper Highlands (Jaetzold et al., 2006). The main physical features is the Aberdare ranges which consist mainly of the Kinangop Plateau, Ol joro Orok Plateau and the Ol Kalou Salient which have slopes that are interrupted by low undulating hills. In most parts, the soils are of volcanic deposits, mainly basaltic lava are dominant. Major soils are the Nitosols, Andosols and Phaeozems (Jaetzold et al., 2006) which are highly fertile.The north western highlands experience primarily uni-modal rainfall distribution, which starts in April and continues through to October/November with peak in May and August (Figure 3). Rainfall ranges from 1200 to 2200 mm and the average annual temperature from 14 to 28 o C. The elevations range from about 900 m asl in the Kerio valley to 2700 m asl in the cool highlands of Elgeyo escarpment and Cherangani hills with some higher ridges of up to 3365 m asl on the eastern part. On the western boundary the extinct volcano, Mt. Elgon is an outstanding landmark which rises to 4000 m asl. Apart from the volcanic rocks of the Mt. Elgon area, most of the regions are underlain by acid to intermediate rocks of the basement system. The major soils are Humic Ferralsols in Trans Nzoia, Ferralic Cambisols and Orthic Ferralsols in Uasin Gishu (FAO- UNESCO, 1994). There are pockets of Acrisols which are not widely distributed. These soils have low fertility with a weak to moderate sub-angular block structure and are well drained with high moisture storage capacity.Figure 3 Rainfall in coastal lowlands, mid-altitude, central and north western highlandsA description of farming system of the coastal lowlands has been given in details by Njarui and Mureithi (2004). The rural households engage in diverse agricultural activities which include crops and livestock farming. Maize (Zea mays L.) and cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.) are the main staple foods followed by cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp). They are almost always cultivated as intercrops under trees cash crops of coconuts (Cocos nucifera L.), cashew nuts (Anacardium occidentale L.) and horticultural crops such as mango ((Mangifera indica L.) and citrus (Citrus spp.) as reported by Njarui and Mureithi (2004). Crop yields are generally low due to low soil fertility and poor crop husbandry. For example, maize yield is less than 1 t/ha (Wekesa et al., 2003) compared with over 5 t/ha achieved from research (Mwamachi et al., 2005) and the situation has remained relatively the same. Livestock kept includes cattle, goats, sheep and poultry. Most of the cattle are the local zebus (Bos indicus) and are kept as a source of cash and security against crop failure.The farming systems are characterized by mixed crop-livestock production. Maize is the most important cereal and is commonly intercropped with beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cowpea and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Horticultural fruit trees such as citrus, mango, avocado (Persea Americana Mill.) and pawpaw (Carica papaya L.) are important source of cash. Maize, beans and cowpea are planted in both long and short rains while pigeon pea is planted only during the short rains. The yields are generally low because of low soil fertility, limited use of fertilizer and lack of adoption of recommended agronomic practices. Due to erratic and poor rainfall, crop failure usually occurs in 7 out of 10 seasons. Major livestock kept include cattle, sheep and goats. A large proportion of cattle kept are the Zebu (Bos indicus) mainly under extensive grazing system while in the wetter hill masses adoption of European breeds (Bos Taurus) of cattle is high.Farming is highly commercialized and is predominantly crop-livestock farming system. The main crops grown in Nyandarua County are wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize and vegetables which include potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.), peas (Pisum sativum L.) and carrot (Daucus carota L.). These crops are not exclusively meant for subsistence as they also provide significant income for most of the households. Nevertheless, pyrethrum (Chrysanthemum cinerariifolium [Trevir.] Vis.), cut flowers and horticulture are the main cash crops grown in the County. Livestock farming is a major activity and the main animals reared are exotic European breeds and their crosses for milk production. Goats, sheep, rabbits and poultry are also important in the region.Economic activities in the north western highlands are characterized by mixed crop-livestock farming system. The agricultural sector varies widely from predominantly small scale (<10 ha) with low external inputs to highly mechanized large scale (>20 ha) farming with high levels of external inputs. However, small scale farmers account for more than 80% of the farming community and the number is increasing due to sub-division of large scale farms. The land is highly fertile and ideal for maize, wheat and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) production and due to high yield the region is regarded as the grain basket for the country. Horticultural crops grown include tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), mangoes and vegetables. The major cattle production system is the open grazing system where dairy cows are kept for commercial purposes. Zero grazing is also practiced in the small scale farms. In some farms, beef cattle are also kept for local market.Livestock play an important role in the livelihoods of rural households in all the regions. They are important source of food, milk, manure, draft power for crop production and are sold to for cash. They also provide investment, employment, and risk reduction opportunities. In semi-arid region animals represent a \"saving account\", providing an economic security against frequent crop failure (Muhammad, 1996). The major ruminant livestock kept include, cattle, sheep and goats. The cattle comprise of the local Zebu, European breeds mainly the Friesian, Ayrshire, Jersey, Guernsey and their crosses with local Zebu. Dairy cattle are not popular in the coastal lowlands compared with Zebu cattle because they are more susceptible to tsetse flies and tickborne disease (Maloo et al., 1994;MoLD, 2012). A recent study in coastal lowlands indicates that about 71.3% of the respondents owned Zebu compared with 34.3% who owned dairy cattle (Njarui et al., 2016). The exotic dairy cattle are widely kept in the other regions because of the high demand for milk and favourable milk prices. The small ruminants, sheep and goats are widely kept in all the regions because they are resilience to drought and can easily be sold off to provide cash in the event of crop failure. Livestock are either kept under stall feeding/zerograzing or grazing but the combination of the two systems is common. Grazing is more common in the coastal lowlands where farmers relatively large number of local zebu and do not have sown pastures.The dairy cattle are milked manually under the smallholder system usually twice per day; in the morning and afternoon. There are differences in milk production among the different region. Average daily milk production was reported to be about 11.8 litres/cow in central highlands (Muia et al., 2011), 6 -9 litres/cow/day in mid-altitude eastern region (Mungube et al., 2014) and 7.8 litres/cow/day in coast lowlands (Njarui et al., 2016). Low milk production has been attributed to poor nutrition and lack of supplementation with high protein feeds (Lanyasunya et al., 2006;Lukuyu et al., 2011). The Zebu also provide milk for household consumption but normally produces comparatively less milk (<4 litres/cow/day) than the dairy cattle. There are several marketing channels for milk which include catering services located in the urban centres, neghbouring households and well established milk processing factories while beef cattle are sold in local markets.Farmers normally depend on natural pastures, cultivated forages and crop residues from cereals and grain legumes after grain harvest (Figure 4). However in the coast lowlands the proportion of farmers with sown forages is low and livestock depend on natural pastures. Over 90% of farmers in mid-altitude region, central highlands and north western highlands grow Napier grass compared with 145 in coastal lowlands (Njarui et al., 2016). Napier grass is the most important forage crop for cut-and-carry feeding where animals are confined in stalls under zero-grazing system. It is preferred because it is high yielding and larger amount of herbage can be obtained from a relatively small area. However, the survival of Napier grass in central highlands is threatened by emergence of smut disease. The disease has been reported to cause yield loss of 25-46% (Mwendia et al., 2006). Browse legume species such as Sesbania (Sesbania sesban L.), Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala Lam.), Calliandra (Calliandra calothyrus Meissn.) and Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium [Jacq.] Steud.) are planted but generally only a few trees are found in the farm. Farmers purchase small quantities of commercial concentrate and mineral supplements, particularly for high yielding dairy cattle. Kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandistenum Hochst.) is an important natural pasture for grazing in central highlands. Generally there is overgrazing and poor management of pastures which lead to low productivity. During the dry season, the grasses are deficient in minerals, crude protein (CP) and energy with CP dropping to less than 4% (Thairu and Tessema, 1987). On the other hand, the stovers are usually high in roughage, but low in nutritive value (3-5% CP) and do not provide adequate nutrients required for optimal production (Njarui et al., 2011).Figure 3 Main type of feeds used for feeding livestock by months across four regions (Source: Njarui et al., 2016) Seasonal fluctuation in feed availability is widespread with low feed availability being felt during the dry season across all the regions. The low and erratic rainfall and frequent drought has been attributed to seasonal shortfall of feed resources. Feed availability follow the rainfall pattern closely with relatively adequate feed reported during the wet season. In most of the regions, feed shortage occurs from January to May while in mid-altitude eastern region it is in July to October. The proportion of farmers who experience feed shortage is relatively high (79-99%) in this region (Njarui et al., 2016). Low availability of feed has a direct effect on performance of livestock productivity (meat or milk).Figure 4 Level of feeds availability by month (all type of feed considered); ≤3 inadequate and >3 adequate (Adapted from: Njarui et al., 2016).The biophysical and farming systems characterisation presented in this paper show a large diversity across the regions where the study was conducted. While the coastal lowlands is low lying from sea level and rising to 300 m asl in the other regions have the altitude ranging from 800 m to above 4000 m asl in the mountain areas. Soils are sandy and shallow in the coast lowlands whereas soil the in the highlands are fertile and deep. In all the regions, farming system is complex and farmers keep different types of livestock and cultivate a variety of crops.Livestock generally depend on natural pastures, cultivated forages and crop residues Napier grass is the most widely cultivated fodder due to its high yield. However, livestock feed scarcity is widespread and is attributed to low and erratic rainfall and frequent drought. While in the coastal lowlands there is limited cultivation of forages farmers have adopted methods of improving their livestock feed base in the other regions.Brachiaria grass is one of the most important tropical grasses distributed throughout the tropics especially in Africa (Renvoize et al., 1996). The genus Brachiaria consists of about 100 documented species of which seven perennial species of African origin have been used for pasture production in South America, Asia, South Pacific and Australia (Miles et al., 1996). It has high biomass production potential and produces nutritious herbage thus increase livestock productivity (Holmann et al., 2004;Jotee, 1988). Brachiaria is adapted to drought and low fertility soils, sequesters carbon through its large roots system, enhance nitrogen use efficiency and subsequently minimize eutrophication and greenhouse gas emissions (Subbarao et al., 2009;Arango et al., 2014;Moreta et al., 2014;Rao et al., 2014). Brachiaria plays important roles in soil erosion control and ecological restoration. Brachiaria species have been important component of sown pastures in humid low lands and savannas of tropical America with current estimated acreage of 99 million hectare in Brazil alone (Jank et al., 2014).Whole plant samples of 79 Brachiaria ecotypes were collected from five different parts of Kenya: Alupe, ILRI Campus, Kiminini, Kisii andKitui in 2013 and2014, andmaintained The DNA was extracted using cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) (Doyle and Doyle, 1990) method with slight modifications. About 150 mg of the young leaves were cut into small pieces, ground in liquid nitrogen and added with 800 μl of 2% CTAB buffer. The suspension was transferred into a clean microfuge tubes and incubated at 65 °C for 30 minutes, followed by incubation at room temperature for 5 minutes and centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 10 minutes.After centrifugation, 400 μl of supernatant was transferred into new microfuge tubes and 400 μl of chloroform iso-amyl alcohol (24:1) were added to each tube and mixed by inversion for 10 minutes. Tubes were spun at 3,500 rpm for 10 minutes, and aqueous phase was transferred to clean microfuge tubes, and 400 μl of chloroform iso-amyl alcohol (24:1) were added again to each tube and spun for 10 minutes at 1,100 rpm and the process was repeated twice. After the final centrifugation, the DNA was precipitated in 300μl of cold isopropanol (100%) and inverted about 50 times to facilitate the mixing and precipitation, and incubated overnight at -20°C.The following day the microfuge tubes were removed from the freezer, thawed and spun at 3,500 rpm at 4 °C for 20 minutes. The isopropanol was decanted and the genomic DNA pellet was air dried. The DNA pellet was rinsed with 300μl of 70% (w/v) ethanol and dissolved in 100μlof low salt TE buffer containing 3μl of 10 mg/ml of 1% RNase solution and incubated in water bath at 45°C for 90 minutes. DNA quality and quantity were checked in 0.8% agarose gel (w/v) and NanoDrop Spectrophotometer. The genomic DNA was adjusted to the final concentration of 20 ng/μl and stored at 4°C for PCR amplification.The genomic DNA was amplified using AccuPower®PCRPreMix (BIONEER Negative dye). A reaction volume of 10μl containing 0.4 μl MgCl2 (final concentration of 2mM MgCl2), 0.4 μl each of forward and reverse primers labeled with different fluorescent dyes: 6-FAM (blue), VIC (green), NED (black) and PET (red), 2 μl template DNA (20 ng/μl) and 6.8 μl of sterile distilled water was used for PCR amplification. A total of 22 SSR markers (Table 1) initially developed for B. ruziziensis with the proven transferability to other species were used in this study (Silva et al., 2013). The PCR conditions were, initial denaturation for 5 minutes at °C followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 sec, 57 °C for 60 sec, 72 °C for 2 minutes and final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes. The amplicons integrity was checked using agarose gel electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel (w/v) stained with 2.5 μl of GelRed solution. The agarose gel images were visualized under Ultra-Violet and the digital image was captured. The size of amplified fragments was estimated comparing with1kbDNAladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The SSR fragment sizes and allele variations in the repeats were assessed by capillary electrophoresis of amplicons and sequencing the amplified loci. The multiplexed PCR products were mixed with 8.87μlHi-Diformamide and 0.135 μl Fluorescent-labeled GeneScan™ LIZ size standard (Applied Biosystems, USA) in a 96-well microtiter plate. The mixed products were denatured at 95°C for 3 minutes and snap-chilled on ice for 5 minutes to avoid the formation of double strand DNA.The products were loaded to Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA). The allele sizes generated by all 22 SSR markers on 79 ecotypes and eight commercial varieties were scored using GeneMapper v4.1 software (Applied Biosystems, USA). ALS-Binary and Allelobin software (http://www.icrisat.org/bt-software-d-allelobin.htm) were used to convert allelic data to binary data (0, 1) where 0 and 1 represent absent and presence of an allele, respectively. Statistical analysis of allelic and binary data were performed using PowerMarker v.3.25 (Liu and Muse, 2005) to obtain total number of alleles per locus, allele size range, genetic diversity and heterozygosity, and frequency based genetic distances were calculated using shared alleles distance matrix. The population diversity indices e.g. number of allele, private allele, and effective allele per locus, Shannon Information index, observed and expected heterozygosity were calculated using GenAIEx v.6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012). The same software was used to compute analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and matrix of genetic distance. The Dice binary similarity coefficient (Dice, 1945) was used to generate the Unweighted Neighbor-Joining tree (NJT) showing relationships among test genotypes in Darwin Software v6.0 (Perrier and Jacquemound, 2006).Descriptive statistics for all marker sets were computed (Table 2). The major allele frequency ranged from 0.2405 (Brz3002) to 0.8228 (Brz0076) with mean of 0.5184. The number of different alleles ranged from 3 (Brz0029) to 10 (Brz0130) with mean of 5.45. The genetic diversity averaged to 0.6225 with range of 0.3169 to 0.8021. Similarly, the polymorphic information content ranged from 0.3087 (Brz0076) to 0.8384 (Brz3002) with mean of 0.5825.The population diversity indices for five ecotype populations from Kenya were summarized (Table 3). The ILRI population had highest number of different alleles and the least for Alupe population. The number of private allele was highest for ILRI population and the lowest for Kisii population. The information index ranged from 0.408 to 0.887 with mean of 0.599. The observed heterozygosity was higher than expected for all populations. The percentage polymorphic loci ranged from 46.47% (Kitui) to 86.87% (ILRI).The pairwise genetic distance and population matrix of Nie genetic identity were calculated (Table 4). The genetic distance was highest between Alupe and Kitui populations (0.510) whereas the least between ILRI and Kiminini populations (0.307). Similarly, genetic identity was the highest between ILRI and Kiminini populations (0.636) and the lowest between Alupe and Kitui populations (0.235). The PCoA plot of ecotypes from five populations showed no distinct clustering pattern (Figure 1). The first two principal coordinate explained 18.27% of the total genetic variation within the test ecotypes. Specifically, the first and second coordinates explained 10.85% and 7.42% of the total genetic variation, respectively. However, an Unweighted Neighbor Joining tree of 79 ecotypes and eight commercial cultivars showed them into three distinct clusters (Figure 2). The partitioning of the total variation in population at different levels was estimated with AMOVA (Table 5). Within the individual difference contributed highest (81%) to total variation followed by among individual difference (17%) and among population differences (2%). The fixation index (FST) and number of immigration per generation (Nm) for study populations were 0.021 and 11.585 respectively. Brachiaria grass has shown a great potential as preferred forage option to supply quality forage to livestock especially during the dry seasons in East Africa. Current efforts are focused on repatriation in the form of hybrids and improved varieties developed mostly in South America and Australia. These repatriated materials have shown excellent performance in terms of biomass yields and livestock productivity but challenges of pests and diseases are observed in some varieties indicating potential threat of pests and diseases as acreage under Brachiaria continue to grow in Africa. Moreover, all repatriated commercial varieties were developed outside Africa in the absence of natural pests and enemies. Therefore upscaling of repatriated material requires caution and Africa based Brachiaria improvement program is imperative to develop varieties considering agro-climatic diversity of World's second largest continent and natural pests and disease. The genetic complexity, primarily apomictic mode of reproduction, and abundant natural variations in Africa urge for two pronged approach (selection and breeding) for improving Brachiaria grass in Africa. All-inclusive germplasm base with documented variations are prerequisite for the effective breeding programs. This study collected 79 Brachiaria ecotypes in Kenya and documented their genetic variations using microsatellite markers.The PIC values for 22 SSR markers averaged to 0.5825 suggesting markers were capable in differentiating 79 Kenyan Brachiaria ecotypes. The PIC value in this study is within the range reported by Silva et al. (2013), Jungmann et al. (2009a) and Vigan et al. (2011) but was lower than found by Jungmann et al. (2009b) and Pessoa-Filho et al. (2015). Similarly, the average numbers of allele detected per loci (5.45) was in the range reported by Silva et al. (2013), Jungmann et al. (2009a), andVigan et al. (2011) but was about half and one third of that reported by Jungmann et al. (2009b) and Pessoa-Filho et al. (2015), respectively. However, these comparisons may not be conclusive due to differences in markers and germplasm (in terms of type and number) and germplasm species compositions.The analysis of the distributions of alleles across populations is important for explaining genetic diversity and population relationships (Szpiech et al., 2008). Private alleles are important in plant breeding and conservation as they are present only in a single population among a broader collection of populations (Kalinowski, 2004). Five ecotypes populations of Kenya were different for private alleles with highest number of private alleles in ILRI population and least in Kiminini population. Such variations in the private alleles among populations moist likely was the effect of population size ranging from 3 to 60 individual per population. Although no information available on species composition of each population, it is likely the presence of multiple species resulting into high number of private alleles in some population. Irrespective of populations HO was higher than HE indicating some degree of gene flow in each population.It is consistent with the human involvement in moving planting materials and out crossing nature of some Brachiaria species for example B. ruziziensis.The study population varied for genetic distance and genetic identity coefficients. The highest genetic distance between Alupe and Kitui populations can be explained by the wider geographical distance between these two locations (675 km) but the genetic distance between other populations could not be associated to geographical proximity. Reports are available on forage research including seed production of B. ruziziensis in Kitale, Kenya (Boonman 1971;Boonman 1993), and involvement of Kenya Agricultural Research Institute and Kenya Seed Company in the past in production and trading B. ruziziensis seeds (Wandera 1997). It is likely that some of these Brachiaria seeds might have reached to farmers' field and other research stations in Kenya including ILRI and afterwards naturalized in the wild. If this hold true a low genetic distance (0.307) between ILRI and Kiminini (20 km away from Kitale) populations could be because of shared genetic materials in early days.The contribution of within individual difference to total variation was 81%, whereas among the individual and among populations differences contributed 17% and 2%, respectively (Table 5).These observations were in agreement with Vigna et al. (2011) and Pessoa-Filho et al. (2015), who reported high contribution of within the accession/individual differences to total variation in B. brizantha (84%) and B. ruziziensis (88%) populations. Similarly, Garcia et al. (2013) and Azevedo et al. (2011) reported 73% and 65% of total variation attributed to within species or cluster, respectively. However, Jungmann et al. (2010) reported 44% of the variation in B. humidicola accessions due to the subdivision of the germplasm into five groups. The FST and effective number of migrants per generation (Nm) values of 0.021 and 11.580 indicated relatively a negligible genetic differentiation among populations (Wright 1951) and relatively high level of gene flow among the Kenyan ecotypes populations (Vicetich and Waite, 2000) respectively. A low genetic differentiation among the study populations could be associated with apomictic mode of reproduction, variable ploidy causing meiotic anomalies leading to reduced pollen fertility and dispersal of seeds by migratory herbivorous and humans activities such as hay transportation and feeding animals (do Valle and Savidan 1996;Harrington et al., 2011;Leitch and Leitch 2008;Jungmann et al. 2010;Malo and Saurez, 1995;Vigna et al. 2011).Polyploid plants are effective colonizers that can occupy pioneer habitats and generate individuals that are able to exploit new niches or out-compete progenitor species, whereas apomictic polyploid plants can fix heterosis (Leitch and Leitch 2008;Jungmann et al. 2010;Vigna et al. 2011).This study represents among the very first studies of this century in sub Saharan Africa that involved collection of local Brachiaria ecotypes from different part of Kenya and examination of their genetic differences using microsatellite markers. The genus Brachiaria consists of over 100 species and 33 species have been reported in Kenya.The Eastern and Central Africa is the centre of origin and diversity of the Brachiaria grasses where they occur in natural habitat (Boonman, 1993). However, a few of the species have been selected for forage production and are widely cultivated in South America, Australia and South East Asia. The most common and extensively cultivated Brachiaria species for pastures are B. brizantha, B. ruziziensis, B. decumbens and B. mutica (Ndikumana and de Leeuw,1996). Some of the germplasms were collected in the 1940s in Africa and are held in gene banks across the world under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and have not been exploited for pasture production.Despite the diversity of Brachiaria spp. in Eastern and Central Africa, comparatively little information is available on their agro-morphological characteristics. In Kenya, past evaluations identified and selected Congo Signal (B. ruziziensis) for commercialisation in the Western region (Wandera, 1997). However, the demand for seeds was comparatively low compared with other preferred grass, such as Chloris gayana (Rhodes grass) and therefore, the seed production was discontinued. Other species, B. brizantha, B. decumbens, and B. humidicola were evaluated in small-plot agronomic trials in the 1990s (Ndikumana and de Leeuw, 1996) but none of them found its way into commercial uses.In recent years, there has been renewed interest in Kenya to develop high yielding and nutritious forages to support growing livestock industry using Brachiaria grasses. Grasses in the genus Brachiaria have advantage over grasses in other genera including adaptation to infertile acid soils and produce high dry matter (DM) yield (Rodrigues et al., 2014). The recent programme on pasture development in Kenya commenced with introduction of selected landraces improved cultivars and hybrids from South America and Australia to assess their adaptation and production in different agro-ecological zones. Unfortunately, some of these grasses have shown susceptibility to pest and diseases (Njarui et al., 2016). Consequently there is need to explore other germplasms either through collection or acquisition of material maintained by different research institutions and gene bank across the world.The Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) obtained several Brachiaria accessions from the Genetic Resource Program of International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). To exploit these germplasms for forage, it is important to understand the agro-morphological characteristics and variations that exist among them. Past evaluation of various plant germplasm has indicated considerable diversity in growth habit (Veasey et al., 2001;van de Wouw et al., 2009). Morphological and agronomical classification methods have been widely used to group accessions with similar characters (Pengelly et al., 1992). Successful classification has been carried out on large number of accessions of Buffel grass, Panicum and Indigofera (Jorge et al., 2008: van de Wouw et al., 2008;Hassen et al., 2006) using cluster and principal component analysis and identified distinct groups. The objective of the study was to characterise the variations Brachiaria grasses accessions obtained from CIAT and compare their diversity and morphological and agronomic traits which can be exploited for possible integration in different farming systems of Kenya.The experiment was conducted from December 2013 to August 2014 at KALRO-Katumani (37 o 28'E; 1 o 58'S), Kenya. The climate and soil characteristic have been described by Njarui and Wandera (2004). Elevation is 1600 m asl and mean annual total rainfall is 717 mm, with a bimodal pattern; the long rains occurs from March to May and the short rains from October to December with peaks in April and November, respectively. There are two distinct dry seasons; from January to February and June to September. Evapo-transpiration rates are high and exceed the amount of rainfall in all the months except in November in which total rainfall exceeds total evaporation. The mean temperature is 19.6 o C with March (21 o C) and July (16.6 o C) being the warmest and coolest months, respectively. The soils are chromic luvisols (Aore and Gitahi, 1991) and are generally low in nitrogen and phosphorus (Okalebo et al., 1992), with a pH of 6.5.Eighty accessions of Brachiaria grass were obtained from Genetic Resource Program of CIAT, Columbia. Most of these accessions originated from Eastern Africa countries; Ethiopia, Kenya, Burundi, Rwanda and Uganda and a few from central Africa, Zaire and Zimbabwe. The rest of the accessions were from Togo in West Africa and Oman in Asia. Information regarding the origin of nine accessions was not available.Individual seeds of all 80 Brachiaria accessions were sown in polybags in a greenhouse using forest soil, sand and manures at a ratio of 3:2:1. At about four weeks after seedling emergence, 12 uniform and health seedlings from each accession were transplanted to the field in December 2013. The seedlings were planted in single rows at spacing of 10 cm between seedlings. The row to row spacing between accessions was maintained at 2 m. The spacing between rows was 2 m while the space between different accessions within the row was 1 m. Triple super phosphate (TSP 46% P2O5) fertilizer was applied at a rate of 40 kg P/ha only during planting. The plots were kept weed free by hand weeding.Data was collected from 47 accessions comprising 8 species (Table 1) as the rest were lost due to termite damage and/or poor establishment. The data was collected on 22 agro-morphological characters (Table 2). The characters selected were based on their agronomic relevance and expected variation among the accessions. Twelve qualitative characters were recorded for 10 plants of each accession as suggested by van de Wouw et al. (1999b) in the middle plants leaving one plant on either side of the row to avoid any border effect. Other attributes were recorded from whole plot (Table 2). All plants were evaluated once at 50% flowering stage to minimize differences due to stage of growth.The correlations among the observed variables were calculated using the Pearson's correlation coefficient. When pairs of variables had a high correlation coefficient (r ≥0.7), one of these variables was omitted to avoid indirect weighting in cluster analysis according to criteria applied by Hassen et al. (2006) and van de Wouw et al. (2009). After standardizing the variables to a mean of 0 and a variance of 1, a principal component analysis was carried out using the program Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (SAS Inc. 2001). Hierarchical cluster analysis was carried out using the complete linkage method according to criteria recommended by van de Wouw et al. (2009). Variations between the groups of accessions for the different characteristics were assessed by one-way analysis of variance considering groups as treatments and individual accessions within a group as replications. The principal component (PC) analysis revealed four components with eigenvalues greater than 1 (Table 3). The first principal component which explained 23.8% of the total variation was positively associated with agro-morphological characters: leaf width, plant height, days to 50% flowering, plant spread and flowering duration, and was also negatively associated with leaf ratio. The second PC which explained 20.2% of the total variation was strongly and positively associated with leaf length, inflorescence width and leaf ratio. The third PC which explained 14.5% of the total variation was positively associated with leaf width while the fourth PC which explained only 9.9% of the total variation was strongly and positively associated with culm thickness. The first and second principal components are plotted in Figure 1 and described 44% of the variation. They revealed separation of groups across the PC1 axis. Accessions with higher values for PC1 (16320, 6674, 6686, 6369, 6130, 26133, 6419, 667 and 660) had a prostrate growth habit, higher plant spread and were taller and late flowering. Accessions with higher values for PC2 had an erect growth habit, large leaflets (length to width ratio) and higher inflorescence width. Most of the plant characters recorded showed significant (P<0.05) variations (Table 4). The difference in days to 50% flowering was large and varied from 91-194 days while difference in height was small and ranged from 53-86 cm. Difference in plants spread was large (115-216 cm) with plants in group V having the largest spread and those in group 1 with the lowest spread.On the other hand, the difference between groups on leaf width, leaf ratio, leaf sheath hairiness and inflorescence was small. However, groups were not different for leafiness, leaf length, growth habit, culm thickness and stigma colour. Cluster analysis based on agro-morphological characters highlighted five main groups as shown in the dendrogram (Figure 2). The first level of separation (Group V vs. others) was mainly on the basis of days to 50% flowering and flowering duration. The two accessions classified in group V, both from B. humidicola (6369 and 36083) were late in flowering (Table 4) and took 194 days to flower. The accession 36083 originated from Ethiopia while the origin for 6369 is not known. The next separation (groups IV and III) occurred due to plant spread, leaf width, leaf size (length to width ratio) leaf sheath hairiness, inflorescence width, and plant height. Accessions in group IV had higher spread, broad leaves and more hairiness while accessions in group III were taller and had higher inflorescence width. The classification using agro-morphological technique is useful in defining group based on agronomic characters (Pengelly et al., 1992). In this study, 13 plant characters were selected from a total of 22 morphological and agronomical characters. The principal component and cluster analysis showed existing genetic variability among and between Brachiaria species. Approximately 60% of the accessions evaluated were B. brizantha and majority of these originated mainly from eastern Africa which is regarded as the centre of genetic diversity of Brachiaria. Ethiopia and Kenya accounted for about 51% of the origin of the tested Brachiaria accessions. A good number of accessions were from Burundi, Rwanda and Zimbabwe while the rest from Uganda, Zaire, Oman and Togo were poorly represented. The origin of the member of group was not limited to one country with materials from same region classified in different groups indicating great diversity among the Brachiaria grass. The 11 accessions originating from Ethiopia were distributed in 4 out of the 5 clusters while 13 accessions from Kenya belonged to 3 clusters. It is also possible that the different accessions which are genetically similar occur across different countries. However, genetically closely related accession can have a very different morphology and therefore a very different prospective use and agronomic value (van de Wouw et al., 1999a).The agro-morphological characters were variable in determining the groups with 50% flowering, flowering duration and plant spread being key determinant of the group. These characters are important and can form the basis of selection for different environment and utilization. Flowering data is important adaptive characteristics (Hassen et al., 2006). Early flowering ensure survival and sustainability in areas with short growing period. On the other hand, accessions 6369 and 36083 that flowered late would be useful in areas with long growing season. Those that have a wide spreading habit in cluster IV are useful for ground cover to reduce soil erosion while tall accessions which occurred in cluster III are suitable for cut-andcarry livestock feeding system.The variance accounted by the first and second component for agro-morphological data was 44%, a relatively low percentage of the total variation compared with >75% obtained by Hassen et al. (2006) and Veasey et al. (2001). This may not explain satisfactory the variability expressed by the individual accessions. Normally variation of >75% is required to satisfactory explain the variability expressed between individual accessions (Veasey et al., 2001). However it is important to note that most of the accessions originated from only eight countries in Africa and from each country only a few accessions were classified and this may not reflect the total Brachiaria diversity that exists within the region. Further, even within the country of origin the accessions were from similar agro-ecological zone. For example, all the 13 accessions evaluated from Kenya were collected from areas within the Rift Valley region. There is need to expand collection to cover wider agro-ecological zones in addition to exploring germplasm from other countries in Africa. Nevertheless, the results provided useful information on the diversity among Brachiaria accession. This information would be important for pasture development and future evaluation and collections of Brachiaria species in Africa.Forages play an important role in agricultural economy of developing countries by providing the cheapest source of feed for the livestock. In coastal lowlands of Kenya, one of the most important challenges to livestock production is scarcity of feeds during the dry season. The feed resources available in the smallholder mixed farms are inadequate in quantity and low in quality mainly due to lack of suitable grasses adapted to environmental conditions of the region. Farmers depend on natural pasture for livestock and more often give low priority to pasture establishment. Past attempts to improve dairy production focused mainly on promotion of Napier grass (Mureithi et al., 1998) and other grasses and legumes (Njunie and Ogora, 1990). Despite these efforts, cultivated forages account for less than 15% of dairy cattle feed in all the month within a year (Njarui et al., 2016). In addition, land sub-division has also contributed to feed shortage through limited available land for pasture establishment (Jones et al., 2004). To address the challenges of feed shortage in the region, there is need to select high quality forages that are adapted to the region.Brachiaria grasses are widely grown in South America with over 99 million hectares in Brazil (Jank et al., 2014). Brachiaria grasses are adapted to low soil fertility and grow in a range of environmental conditions and have potential to mitigate climate change (Miles et al., 2004). In Kenya, Brachiaria grows well in areas where annual rainfall is above 700 mm and mean temperatures exceeding 19 o C. It also requires well drained and deep soils (Njarui et al., 2015).There have been previous efforts to improve the productivity of these grasses (Ndikumana and de Leeuw., 1996), but however there is little information on the establishment and growth of these grasses in the coastal region. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the establishment and initial growth of Brachiaria grass cultivars in the coastal lowlands of Kenya.The study was conducted at the Kenya Agricultural Research and Livestock Organisation (KALRO), research centres, Mtwapa and Msabaha in coastal lowlands (CL) of Kenya. Mtwapa lies in CL 3 agro-ecological zone while Msabaha falls in CL4, (Jaetzold et al., 2006). The sites experience bimodal rainfall, the long rains (LR) occurring from March to August and the short rains (SR) from October to December with a short dry spell in January and February. The total rainfall recorded during the experiment period was 193.7 mm at Msabaha and 369.9 mm at Mtwapa. The mean temperatures in both sites was 28 0 C. Prior to commencement of the study, the soils were sampled at 0-20 cm depth and the chemical analyses determined. In Mtwapa, the soil pH was 6.7 (1:2.5 soil water), total 0.03%, organic carbon (OC) 0.3%, phosphorus (p) 18.3ppm, potassium (K) 0.22 (me) %, magnesium (mg) 0.95 and calcium (Ca) 1.5. In Msabaha, the soil pH was 5.3, total N 0.03%, OC 0.26%, phosphorus 15 ppm and magnesium Mg 0.55). Mtwapa as a control but not at Msabaha due to limited seeds. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The plot sizes were 5 m x 4 m with a 1 m path between plots and 1.5 m between replications. The seeds were drilled by hand in furrows of about 2 cm deep on a well prepared seed bed at the seed rate of 5 kg ha -1 with interrows spacing of 0.5 m and covered with a thin layer of soil. Triple superphosphate (TSP, 46% P205) fertilizer was applied in the furrows prior to sowing of seeds at a rate of 40 kg P/ha. The experiments were kept weed free during the experimental period by hand weeding.Plant number and growth parameters (plant height, plot cover, tiller number and plant spread) were recorded at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks after seedling emergence (WAE) in both sites. At the end of establishment period, 16 WAE, the plants were harvested for dry matter (DM) yield determination. Plant numbers were determined by counting within 1 m x 1 m fixed quadrat frame placed randomly over two rows within the plots. Plant height was determined by measuring the primary shoots from the base of the plant to the topmost flag leaf of four tagged plants as described by Rayburn and Lozier (2007). The percentage plot cover was determined from a 1 m x 1 m quadrat sub-divided into 25 squares as described by Njarui and Wandera (2004). Tillers were counted for tagged plants while plant spread was determined by measuring the width of grass stool from one edge to the other for the four tagged plants. During the DM yield determination, the plants were cut to a stubble height of 5 cm in an area of 4 m 2 . Fresh herbage was harvested, weighed and a sub-sample taken, oven dried at of 65 o C to a constant weight and dry weights recorded. The values on growth parameters and dry matter yields were statistically evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using general linear model (GLM) procedure of Statistical Analysis System (SAS) package (SAS, 2001). Means were separated using the Tukey's HD test.Plant numbers increased slightly after 4 WAE and were highest at 12 WAE and then remained fairly stable for all the Brachiaria cultivars at both sites. However plant numbers were more at Mtwapa than at Msabaha (Table 2). Rhodes grass had more plant at Mtwapa in all the observations and were more (P < 0.05) than all Brachiaria cultivars at 4 WAE while in the other observations the plant numbers were not significantly (P < 0.05) different from some of the Brachiaria grasses. At Msabaha plant numbers were higher among the Brachiaria cultivars at 4 and 12 WAE and MG4, Basilisk, Llanero and Xaraes were the only Brachiaria grasses which attained ≥10plant/m 2 (Table 2).The average number of tillers increased gradually over time for all the cultivars in both sites ( At Mtwapa plant height increased steadily in all the Brachiaria cultivars from around 10 cm at 4 WAE to >50 cm at 16 WAE with Mulato II being the tallest both at 12 WAE (44.9 cm) and 16 WAE (92.5 cm) and was the only Brachiaria with similar height to Rhodes at 16 WAE. (Table 4). At Msabaha growth was relatively slow and by 16 WAE none of the cultivar had reached 50 cm in height. Basilisk and Llanero were the tallest while MG4 and Marandu had the lowest height. There was significant difference among the cultivars on plant spread at both sites ( Plot cover increased steadily from around 20% to over 55% at 8 WAE for most of the Brachiaria and thereafter the increase was slow (Table 6). The cv. MG4 consistently recorded the highest plot cover in all the observations although it was not higher (P < 0.05) than most of the Brachiaria cultivars. At Msabaha, all cultivars showed slow growth recording mean plot cover of 16.8 at 4 WAE and 57.4% at 16WAE. Xaraes attained the highest at 16 WAE (80%) and was higher that most of the other Brachiaria cultivars. The low cover attained at Msabaha could probably be due to the low rainfall recorded during the experimental period. Figures 1and 2 shows the dry matter yield of the cultivars at week 16. Generally DM yield for all the Brachiaria cultivars was higher at Mtwapa than at Msabaha. At Mtwapa, there were significant (P < 0.05) differences among the Brachiaria cultivars on DM yields in kg/ha. Xaraes (8700 kg/ha) recorded the highest yield followed by Marandu (7847 kg/ha) while Piata (5000 kg/ha) and Llanero (5300 kg/ha) had the lowest. Rhodes grass cv. Ex-Tozi had similar yield to Llanero and Piata but was lower than the other cultivars. At Msabaha, DM yield ranged between (1700 -3600) with Basilisk and MG4 having higher yield than the other cultivars. Surprising the difference in growth habit that would have contributed to difference in height and spread was not expressed. Llanero which has a prostrate growth habit was even taller than the other cultivars with erect growth habit such as Basilisk and Marandu. However it can be speculated that the high temperature influenced plant spread more than height. The difference in cover among the cultivars attributed to differences in seedling emergence and growth rate among the grasses. Marandu was slow to establish and therefore took time to build reasonable cover. According to Cook et al., (2005), Llanero has strongly stoloniferous growth habit that enables it to have higher cover than the other cultivars. Mulato II also showed a sharp increase in plot cover at 8 and 12 weeks enabling the grass achieve 80% plot cover.Llanero, Mulato II, Marandu and MG4 had higher tillering ability among the cultivars at Mtwapa. The tiller numbers increased the chances of survival for most grasses and that large number of tillers produced allowed grasses to attain relatively high DM at an early age. This concurs with Mganga 2009, reporting that tillering ability complements yield and resilience of grass stand under defoliation. The results are also in agreement with those of Cook (2005) who found out that tillering ability of Llanero is as a result of its growth habit. As grasses ages, forage yield is increased due to the increases in tissues of the plant (Minson, 1990). Wolfson (2000), also reported that shoots or tillers that remain undefoliated for long decline and mayLivestock feed scarcity is a salient feature in semi-arid regions of Kenya (Njarui et al., 2011) and it is a major constraint to livestock production during the dry seasons when the quality also declines. Seasonal fluctuation of feed availability is widespread among smallholder croplivestock farmers and between 79 -99% of experience feed shortage within a year (Njarui et al., 2016). The demand for productive and high quality forages to bridge feed deficit is high. The rising interest in livestock development fuelled by rising demands of animal products has led to research in identifying drought tolerant, more productive and persistence forages to support livestock productivity.Livestock farming is based on a few cultivated pastures species that have a narrow genetic base. Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana L.) which constitutes the main commercial pastures has limited ecological adaptation. On the other hand, Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.), the most widely grown fodder for dairy cattle in hill masses for cut-and-carry production system, is susceptible to stunting and head smut diseases. Napier stunt causes herbage yield reduction of 40-90% (Lusweti et al., 2004;Mulaa et al., 2004) and 35% milk reduction while head smut causes yield loss of 25-46% (Mwendia et al., 2006). Consequently, there is need for diversification of pastures species that are high yielding, have wide agro-ecological adaptation and for insurance against emerging pests and diseases triggered by recent climate change.Grasses in the genus Brachiaria have advantage over those in other genera including adaptation to infertile acid soils and produce high dry matter (DM) yield (Rodrigues et al., 2014). These grasses are the most widely grown forages in South America (Miles et al., 2004) with estimated acreage of 99 million hectares in Brazil alone (Jank et al., 2014), supporting a highly vibrant beef industry. Signal grass (Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk) which was developed in Australia is adapted to a wide range of soil types and environments and grows at a range of altitudes, from 500 to 2300 m asl. It is a highly productive tropical grass that is widespread in South America, Australia, Indonesia, Vanuatu and Malaysia (Low, 2015). Brachiaria grasses produce high biomass, enhance soil fertility and reduce greenhouse gas emission (Peters et al., 2012) and contribute to carbon sequestration (Djikeng et al., 2014). Research efforts in South America led to development of high yielding and nutritious grasses and eventually release of several cultivars from Brachiaria genus. For example, Brachiaria hybrid cv. Mulato II was developed from three way crosses between B. ruziziensis (sexual tetraploid), B. decumbens and B. brizantha (apomitic tetraploid) (Miles et al., 2006). It has superior nutritive value to other warm season grasses and is suitable for grazing (Inyang et al., 2010a). Dry matter yield of up to 19 t/ha has been recorded from Mulato II over 8 months growth period (Argel et al., 2007) The study was conducted at Katumani and Ithookwe in the semi-arid mid-altitude tropics of eastern Kenya (Table 1). Katumani is located at higher altitude but mean temperature is lower than Ithookwe. Ithookwe receives higher mean annual rainfall (1010 mm) than Katumani (700 mm). The rainfall in both sites is bimodal, with the long rains (LR) occurring from March to May and short rains (SR) from October to December with peaks in April and November, respectively. Evapo-transpiration is high and exceeds the amount of rainfall except in November when rainfall is higher than evapo-transpiration. Total annual evapo-transpiration ranges from 1600 to 2300 mm (KARI, 2001). The soils are generally low in nitrogen and phosphorus (Okalebo et al., 1992). The soil chemical analysis determined using method of Horwitz and Latimer (2005) showed a pH of 5.9 (1:2.5 soil: water); total nitrogen (N), 0.12%; organic carbon (OC), 1.21%; phosphorus (P) 15.0 ppm; other minerals (me%) potassium (K), 0.36; calcium (Ca), 3.7 and magnesium (Mg), 5.77 at Katumani. In Ithookwe, the pH was 5.5 ; total N, 0.12%; OC, 1.14%; P, 10.0 ppm; other minerals (me %); K, 0.16; Ca, 2.0; Mg, 4.48 and Na, 0.16.The grasses evaluated were Brachiaria decumbens cv. (CIAT 36087). These were compared with commonly cultivated forages; Napier grass cv. Kakamega 1 and Rhodes grass. The design of the experiment was a randomized complete block in a split-plot arrangement, with four replications. The main plots were grass cultivars and the sub-plots were the regrowth ages after cutting (6, 8 and 12 weeks). Plot sizes were 4 m x 5 m with a 1 m alley between plots and replications. The plots were established during the SR 2013 in November using a seed rate of 5 kg/ha except for Napier grass. The seeds were drilled in furrows at a depth of 0.5-1.0 cm on a well prepared seedbed with an inter-row spacing of 0.5 m and covered with a thin layer of soil. For Napier grass, a single split was planted per hole at a spacing of 1m x 1m apart. Triple super phosphate (TSP 46% P2O5) fertilizer was applied in planting furrows prior to sowing of seeds at a rate of 40 kg/ha P.A standardization cut was made in March 2014 at the start of the LR 2014 wet season in all plots to stimulate uniform plant growth. Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN, 26% N) was applied at 100 kg N/ha per year in 2 splits, during the LR and SR seasons and commenced after the standardisation cut. The fertilizer was broadcasted in the plots and covered slightly using hand hoes, approximately one week after onset of each rainy season. The plots were kept weed free throughout the experimental period by weeding using hand hoes.The first wet season (SR 2013) was regarded as the establishment phase up to 16 weeks after seedling emergence and subsequent seasons as production phase. During the production phase, the data was collected on plant numbers, pest and disease damage and DM yield were recorded. Number of plants was determined by counting plants within a 1m x 1m frame, randomly placed over the 2 central rows at 4 weeks interval. The pest damage was rated on a 1-5 scale (0=no damage and 5=highest damage) every 4 weeks. The plants were repeatedly sampled at re-growth ages of 6, 8 and 12 weeks intervals to determine DM yield. At each harvest, an area of 2 m x 1 m was sampled and the plants were cut to around 5 cm stubble height using hand held sickles. For Napier grass harvesting was made after every 8 weeks since this is the recommended harvest regime and the plants were cut at 10-15 cm stubble height in an area of 2 m x 2 m (4 stools/plot). The fresh material was weighed; a sub-sample was taken where necessary then dried at 105 o C for 48 hours and weighed for DM determination. The herbage samples for forage quality analysis which consisted of all the stem and leaves harvested were dried at 65C for approximately 72 hours.Due to relatively high cost of analysis, only samples harvested during the LR 2014 season at Katumani were analysed. The herbage was ground to pass through a 1-mm screen in a Willey mill (Udy Corporation, Fort Collin, CO). Analysis was conducted for crude protein (CP), fibres, lignin, calcium, phosphorus and in-vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD). Ash was determined by heating the samples at 600 o C for 2 hours in a muffle furnace. Crude protein was determined using micro-Kjeldahl according to the method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC 2000). The neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were determined using the Ankom method of Van Soest et al. (1991). The IVDMD was determined according to the procedure of Goering and Van Soest (1970).Analysis of variance was carried out on plant numbers, DM yield and forage quality composition. The data for Humidicola were not included in the analysis due to poor plant population in all the plots. For the DM yield and quality composition of Napier grass, only the cutting interval at 8 weeks was used for comparison. The plant numbers for Napier grass were not included because only four splits were planted within the sampling area and this was expected to remain constant. The DM yield for each season was obtained by combining the harvest made in the respective seasons. At Katumani, plants died after the LR 2015 season and therefore, it was not possible to analyse data across sites and season. Consequently, an analysis was conducted separately for each site using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 1987) model;Where; A is the measurement (observation response), µ = overall mean, Ri is the effect of i th replicate (i = 1 to 4), Cj is the effect of j th grass cultivars (j = 1 to 9), Ek is the effect of k th cutting interval, (C*E)jk is the interaction between j th cultivar and k th cutting interval and ijk is the experimental error. The means of plant numbers, DM yields and forage quality composition were separated using the least significant difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05 (Steel and Torrie, 1981). #Rainfall and temperature during the experimental period (2014 -2015) and average the rainfall are given in Figure 1. At Katumani, rainfall was around the average in LR 2014 but in SR 2014 and LR 2015, it was below the average. At Ithookwe rainfall was above the average in all the seasons except in LR 2014 where it was below average. The temperature ranged from 17.8 -22.9 o C at Katumani and 20.3 -22.7 o C at Ithookwe.There was no significant (P > 0.05) interaction between the Brachiaria cultivars and cutting intervals on plant numbers in both sites. Significance difference (P < 0.05) on plant numbers occurred among the Brachiaria cultivars in both sites. At commencement of production phase, plant numbers ranged from 9 -19 plants/m 2 at Katumani, ( There was no significant (P > 0.05) interaction between the Brachiaria cultivars and cutting intervals on DM yield in all the seasons at Katumani. Significant differences (P<0.05) on yield occurred between cutting intervals and among the grass cultivars. During the LR 2014 season, yield ranged from 4382 to 7283 kg/ha with MG4 and Piatá attaining the highest yield while Llanero had the lowest (Figure 2a). Significant (P < 0.05) difference was recorded between cutting interval of 6 and 12 weeks (Figure 2b). In SR 2014, the yield declined to between 1521 and 3617 kg/ha (Figure 2c). During this season, the 6 and 8 weeks gave similar yields and were higher than at 12 weeks cutting interval (Figure 2d). In LR 2015 season, DM yield declined further to <2000 kg/ha for all the Brachiaria cultivars (Figure 2e). However increasing cutting interval from 6 to 8 weeks increased yield but at 12 weeks there was no further yield benefit (Figure 2f). The most productive cultivars in all the seasons were Basilisk, MG4, Piatá and Xaraes. The control, Napier grass had highest (P < 0.05) yield than all the Brachiaria cultivars in the first harvest (LR 2014 season) while in SR 2014 season, the yield was not different and in LR 2015 it yielded less than Basilisk and Xaraes. , had a significant effect on yield while in LR 2015 season only the cutting interval had a significant effect on yield. In LR 2014 season, yield ranged from 1738 to 5672 kg/ha with Xaraes, Piatá and Basilisk having the highest yield while Mulato II had the lowest (Figure 3a). The control, Napier grass produced more yield (12766 kg/ha) than all the Brachiaria cultivars while Rhodes grass out yielded Mulato II only. Increasing cutting interval from 6 to 8 weeks increased the yield but a further increase to 12 weeks was not significant (Figure 3b). In SR 2014 season, generally increasing cutting interval resulted to increase in yield for all the Brachiaria cultivars (Figure 3c). In LR 2015 season, increasing cutting interval from 6 to 12 weeks tripled the DM yield (Figure 3d). However, in SR 2015 none of the cultivar consistently produced higher yield than the others at all cutting intervals but yields were lowest at 6 week (1400 -4300 kg/ha) and highest at 12 weeks cutting interval (3500 -7100 kg/ha) (Figure 3e). Mulato II had poor yield at 6 and 8 weeks but production improved at 12 weeks cutting interval. Generally, Piatá, Xaraes, Basilisk, MG4 and Llanero tended to produce the highest DM yield whereas Mulato II had the lowest. There were significant interactions between Brachiaria cultivars and cutting interval on CP, fibres, ash, digestibility, Ca and P (Table 3). For the lignin only the main effect (cultivars and cutting interval) had a significant effect. The CP declined with increasing cutting interval from 6 weeks (CP 9.8 -12.9% of DM) to 12 weeks (6.1 -8% of DM). Mulato II had the highest CP content at both 6 and 8 weeks cutting intervals. The NDF ranged from 56.1 to 66.4% of DM and ADF from 32.7 to 48.6% of DM and increased with cutting interval. The control, Rhodes grass had higher NDF at each cutting interval. The ash was highest at 6 weeks (12.3-15.0%) and declined with increased cutting interval for all the grasses. Lignin content was highest at 12 weeks cutting interval with Marandu (3.0%) having the lowest and Mulato II (5.30%) the highest. The IVDMD ranged from 46.0 to 61.1% and declined with increased cutting interval. The level of Ca and P increased with cutting interval from 6 to 8 weeks while at 12 weeks they either remained the same, increased or declined depending on the cultivars (Table 3). The control; Rhodes grass had the highest Ca at 8 and 12 weeks (0.35 and 0.36%) while MG4 had the highest P (0.13%) at 8 week cutting interval.Insect pests were recorded in all the Brachiaria cultivars in most of the months except on Llanero and the control; Rhodes grass (Table 4). The common pests were the red spider mites (Tetranychus urticae Koch.), grass midge (Oscella frit L.) and to some extent sorghum shoot fly (Atherigona soccata Rondani). The red spider mites attacked the underside of the leaves while the grass midge and shoot fly attacked the young growing tillers. The damage from the spider mites was the most devastating particularly for Mulato II and Marandu which recorded a total index of 4.1 and 5.0, respectively (Table 4). The highest attack was in March, October and November with indices of 0.5 to 1.0, implying that between 50 and 100% of plants were damaged. Xaraes, Piatá, Marandu and Mulato II were susceptible to red spider mites while MG4 and Basilisk showed some level of resistance. When attached by the mites, Basilisk and MG4 produced some purple pigmentation (probably anthocyanin) on leaves limiting insect infestation. The diseases recorded were leaf rust, leaf spot and blight mainly at Ithookwe. Rust attack was widespread in MG4 and Rhodes grass and was concentrated on the old mature leaves. Blight infestation was minor on all the Brachiaria cultivars and occurred during the dry season between July and September only. This study has provided important information on effect of cutting interval on the productivity of Brachiaria grass cultivars which could be applied as guidelines to maximise quality and yield in semi-arid tropics of Kenya.The Brachiaria cultivars had a high plant numbers and showed variation in adaptation to different environment within the semi-arid tropics of Kenya. The higher plant numbers for MG4 and Marandu than other Brachiaria cultivars was attributed to their high germination level (Nguku et al., 2015). These grasses are perennial but nevertheless the plant numbers continued to decline over time. Although they flowered, they did not produce seeds due to low rainfall thus there was no new plant numbers through seedlings recruitment. The control, Rhodes grass produced viable seeds resulting in increased plant numbers. The poor survival of the Brachiaria grass at Katumani was due to low precipitation and the prolonged dry season experienced from May -October 2015. Difference in amount of rainfall received has been attributed to grass survival in the same environment (Njarui et al., 2015). Increasing cutting interval from 6 to 12 weeks increased yield in the first harvest but in second and third harvest there was no significant yield gains at Katumani. These findings are similar to those of Hare et al. (2013b) who reported that DM yield of guinea grass cv. Mombasa increased from 9.8 to 12 t/ha by delaying cutting interval from 30 to 60 days but at 90 days the DM yield did not increase in Thailand. However, this trend was not manifested at Ithookwe where longer cutting interval of 12 weeks resulted in increased yield. Hare et al. (2013a) also observed increased herbage accumulation in Mulato II from about 11 to 20 t/ha in Thailand as regrowth interval increased from 30 to 90 days. Similarly, Inyang et al. (2010b) reported lower herbage accumulation at 2 weeks regrowth than at cutting at 6 weeks interval for the Mulato II. A study by Njarui and Wandera (2004) showed higher yield for Basilisk at longer cutting interval than at short cutting interval in the same region. The difference in yield due to cutting intervals was attributed to moisture availability. At Katumani, rainfall was low compared with Ithookwe and was not sufficient to sustain addition growth beyond 8 weeks. Moreover, evapo-transpiration is high in the semi-arid resulting in reduced moisture in the soil. Stewart and Hash (1982) recorded evapo-transpiration rate of 8.2 mm per day in the semi-arid. The poor performance of Mulato II and Marandu at 6 and 8 weeks cutting interval at Ithookwe was attributed to infestation by the red spider mites. However, it seemed to improve in SR 2015 under the 12 weeks cutting interval as population of mites tended to decline. Mulato II is hybrid developed from three species of Brachiaria for resistance against spittle bugs in South America but its susceptibility to native pests in the Africa was not a surprise.Overall, the CP and digestibility were reasonably high, for all the Brachiaria cultivars when cut at 6 and 8 weeks of growth which is an important aspect for livestock production. Though Mulato II had the highest CP at 6 and 8 weeks (9.8 -12.9%) it was lower than the values of 13-16% recorded by Vendramini et al. (2014) but were similar to values reported by Hare et al. (2009). Hare et al. (2009) recorded average CP over 3 years ranging from 9.8 to 11.8% (leaf) and 6.7 to 7.3% (stem) of several Brachiaria grasses including Mulato II, Marandu, Xaraes and Basilisk.Among the most productive cultivars, Piatá and Xaraes were more nutritious in terms of CP than Napier and Rhodes grass. Basilisk and MG4 and had similar CP, fibres and digestibility to Napier and Rhodes grass and thus can be regarded as equally nutritious. This implies that they can complement Napier and Rhodes grass as livestock feed and meet the minimum CP content of 7%, the critical for animal production. The decline of CP and INVDMD with increased cutting intervals is attributed to accumulation of fibres with time. Inyang et al. (2010b) reported higher nutritive value of Mulato II when harvested at 2 week re-growth than at 6 weeks.Cutting Mulato II at 30 days interval produced CP level of 3 -4% greater than cutting interval of 45 to 60 days interval (Hare et al., 2013a). In another study, Hare et al. (2013b) also showed that increasing cutting interval significantly reduced the CP and increased the fibres concentration in guinea grass.The Brachiaria cultivars evaluated differed in performance within the semi-arid tropical Kenya. They showed low adaptation at Katumani and failed to tolerate the dry season of 2015 implying that they are unlikely to survive in areas that receives less than 800 mm annual rainfall with dry seasons exceeding four months. The DM yield was highest in the first harvest and declined progressively with seasons at Katumani with Xaraes, Piatá, Basilisk and MG4 consistently producing the highest yield. At Ithookwe, yields were fairly stable across all seasons with Xaraes, Llanero and Piatá having the highest yield in most of the seasons. These top performing cultivars yielded as much as the controls; Napier and Rhodes grass thus could be considered as suitable grasses for inclusion in the local farming system. Although Mulato II had higher CP than the other cultivars, high DM yield is more appealing to farmers and due to its being susceptible to pest, it is not recommended for cultivation in the region. Cutting interval of 6 weeks had the highest CP and digestibility but had the lowest DM yield. On the other hand, the quality was low at 12 weeks but yield was highest although in some instances it was not significantly higher than at 8 weeks interval. In view of the fact that at 12 weeks, the nutritive quality declined considerably, it is recommended that the best option for harvesting be 8 weeks interval as the yield is high and the nutritive quality is not compromised. However, there is need to evaluate their feeding value to livestock.Napier grass and Rhodes grass are the major cultivated forage grasses in Kenya due to their relatively high herbage yield, ease of propagation and management. In the intensive market oriented smallholder livestock production systems of central Kenya, Napier and Rhodes grass constitute between 40 and 80% of forages used by smallholder dairy farmers (Romney et al., 2004). Although there are efforts to evaluate new more adaptive cultivars of Napier grass (Wamalwa, 2013) there has been limited research on other grasses to widen the genetic base of fodders for the region. In addition, the emerging lethal diseases such as Napier smut (Farrel et al., 2001) and Napier stunt (Jones et al., 2004) reduces the yield of Napier grass by 40 to 90% (Orodho, 2007) and therefore the urgent need to identify and promote other high quality forages that are adapted to cool sub-humid highlands of central Kenya.Brachiaria grasses are productive warm-season perennial grasses with superior nutritive value to other warm-season grasses (Vendramini et al., 2014), and can be used for grazing (Inyang et al., 2010a) or harvested and conserved for feeding when needed (Vendramini et al., 2010). Brachiaria grasses are indigenous to eastern central and southern Africa (Ndikumana and de Leeuw, 1996) and have revolutionized the livestock industry as the most adaptable and widely cultivated in South America (Miles et al., 2004). The potential of improved Brachiaria grass in its native land Africa remains largely unexploited and yet they offer opportunities to address the challenge of livestock feed scarcity.A few Brachiaria grass cultivars were introduced to improve forage production, broaden the range of adapted grasses, and ensure high nutritive value in Kenya. The introduction of new cultivars should be based on adequate understanding of physiological processes and growth potential under a range of management practices. Cutting frequency is an important management practice that affects herbage accumulation, nutritive value and persistence of warm-season grasses (Inyang et al., 2010). Hare et al. (2013) compared Mulato II, Cayman and BR02/1794 in Thailand and concluded that cutting at 30 days intervals would produce CP levels of 3 − 4% higher than cutting at 45 and 60 days intervals, but herbage accumulation was 20% lower than cutting at the longer intervals. Inyang et al. (2010b) studied the effects of regrowth interval and stubble height on herbage accumulation, nutritive value and persistence of Mulato II. While herbage harvested at 2 week regrowth intervals had greater nutritive value, herbage accumulation was less than observed for longer regrowth intervals, supporting results reported with other warm-season grasses. However, there is little information on herbage accumulation and nutritive value of these new hybrids in tropical regions and in particular Kenya. Consequently, there is need to understand the production of these grasses under different management option. The specific objective of this study was to determine the herbage yield and nutritive value of selected Brachiaria cultivars under different cutting frequency in the cool subhumid highlands of central Kenya.The experiment was conducted at the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) Ol joro Orok Centre, in the cool central highlands of Kenya from December 2013 to March 2016. The site is located at latitude, 00 0 22' S and longitude, 36 0 46' W at altitude of 2393 m asl in Upper Highlands 2-3 (UH 2-3) agro ecological zone (Jaetzold et al., 2006. Average annual rainfall is about 950 mm is bi-modal with the long rains from March to May and the short rains from September to December. Temperature ranges from 8 and 22 °C with a mean of 13 o C. The soils are classified as verto-luvic and chromo-luvic Phaeozems (Sombroek et al., 1982). These are well drained with good permeability. Prior to initiation of the experiment, the pH was 4.7 (1:2.5 soil: water), 0.24% total nitrogen (adequate), 10 ppm phosphorus (low), 1.72 me potassium (adequate) and 2.4 % total organic carbon (moderate).The grass treatments were Brachiaria brizantha cvs. Marandu, Xaraes, Piata, and MG4, B. decumbens cv. Basilisk, B. humidicola cvs. Humidicola and Llanero and Brachiaria hybrid cv. Mulato II while Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) and Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) were included as control. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design in a split plot arrangement with four replications. The main plots contained the grasses while the defoliation frequencies, 6, 8 and 12 weeks formed the sub-plots. The plot size measured 4m by 5 m. Phosphorus was applied to the soil prior to sowing of the seeds at a rate of 40 kg P haˉ¹ in the planting rows. The grass seeds were drilled by hand in furrows about 1-2 cm deep in a well prepared seed bed with an inter row spacing of 0.5 m and covered with a thin layer of soil.The plots were kept weed free by hand weeding. All the plants were cut back to a 5 cm stubble height at the end of the establishment phase (20 weeks after seedling) to stimulate uniform growth. Plots were top-dressed with 50 kg N ha -1 per season and the application commenced after standard cut.Measurements were made on dry matter yield at 6, 8 and 12 weeks intervals during the wet and dry seasons per schedule in Table 1. Dry matter yield was determined from a net harvest area of 2 m x 2 m. The harvesting was done by cutting the grasses at a stubble height of 5 cm above the ground and the fresh herbage weights recorded and dried at 60°C to a constant weight for dry matter determination and forage quality analysis. The data on DM yield and nutritive value parameters were analysed using PROC MIXED General Linear model of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., 2001) with cultivars and cutting interval, year and their interactions as fixed effects. Block and its interactions were random effects. The means were separated using the least significant difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05 (Steel and Torrie, 1981).The rainfall received during the experiment period was below the medium term average of 11 years during the long rains (March -May) while during the short rains season it was around the medium term average (Figure 1). There was no significant (P > 0.05) interaction between the Brachiaria cultivars and cutting interval on DM yield in both seasons. However, significant difference occurred among the Brachiaria and the cutting interval in both seasons. During the wet season, Basilisk and Piata had the highest DM yield but were similar to Napier grass but higher than Rhodes (Figure 2a). Marandu, MG4, and Xaraes had similar yield to Rhodes. Llanero had the lowest yield followed by Mulato II. Increasing cutting interval from 6, 8 and 12 weeks resulted in increased DM yield (Figure 2b). During the dry season, Napier grass out yielded all the Brachiaria grass cultivars. Among the Brachiaria cultivars, Piata and MG4 were the most productive and had higher (P < 0.05) yield than Rhodes grass (Figure 2c). Llanero had the lowest yield and was the only cultivar that produced lower yield than Rhodes grass. Reducing cutting interval from 8 to 6 weeks and increasing cutting interval from 8 to 12 weeks resulted in increasing DM yield (Figure 2d). There were no significant interaction between the cultivars and the cutting interval on any of the parameters analysed for chemical composition. Significant effects occurred on both the main effects (cultivars and cutting interval). All the Brachiaria grass cultivars except Piata had CP similar to Napier grass (Table 2). The mean CP of 14% recorded among the Brachiaria grasses was higher than that reported by Hare et al. (2015) for Mulato II and Mendonca et al. (2013) for B. decumbens. All Brachiaria cultivars had similar NDF to Napier grass but were lower (P < 0.05) than Rhodes grass. The mean NDF of 64% among the Brachiaria grasses was higher than that reported by Hare et al. (2015). Napier grass had higher DMD than the Brachiaria cultivars except MG4 while Rhodes grass had similar DMD to all the Brachiaria grasses. Xaraes had highest Ca content and was more than Mulato II, Piata and Rhodes grass.The mean CP content at 6 to 8 weeks cutting interval was similar but further increase of cutting interval to 12 weeks resulted in decreased CP (12.6%) (Table 3). The decrease in CP with increasing cutting interval is consistent with findings by Vendramini et al. (2014) on Brachiaria hybrids. The CP of Brachiaria grasses, was about double the minimum CP concentration of 60 to 80 g kg -1 dry matter (DM) required for optimum rumen microbial activity (Minson and Milford, 1967), suggesting that the Brachiaria grasses could be used to supplement livestock feeding on low quality roughages. Varying the cutting interval did not affect dry matter digestibility and this could be attributed to low fibre content at both 6 and 12 weeks. However, increasing cutting intervals from 6 to 8 weeks resulted in declining Ca concentration in the herbage but on the contrary the P content increased significantly (P < 0.05). Among the Brachiaria cultivars, Piata consistently produced high DM yield in both wet and dry season while Basilisk had high yield in wet season and MG4 in the dry season. During the wet season, the most productive Brachiaria had similar yield to Napier grass but during the dry season, Napier grass out yielded all the Brachiaria grass. The performance of Llanero was generally poor. The nutritive quality in term of CP for most of the Brachiaria was similar to Napier and Rhodes grass. It is important to examine the data for the other two seasons to conclusively determine the performance of the Brachiaria grass cultivars in the cool highlands of central Kenya.Seasonal feed shortage and inadequate nutrient supply are major constraints to livestock production in coastal Kenya (Mburu, 2015). Ruminant livestock are a predominant component of mixed farming in the region. Dairy production contributes to both improved household nutrition and income (Nicholson et al., 2002). Dairy cattle are mainly fed on natural pastures since Napier grass, the recommended fodder is grown by only 10% of the farmers (Njarui et al., 2016). Knowledge on the effects of harvesting frequency on foliage yield and quality is essential for development of successful livestock year round feeding strategies. The interval between harvests of grasses affects herbage production, nutritive value and re-growth ability. According to Ball et al, (2009), forage quality is influenced by forage species, stage of maturity at harvest, soil fertility and climatic factors. Young re-growth is characterized by high protein, low cellulose and lignin and high digestibility (Wijiphans et al., 2009). Various grass harvest intervals and intensity studies revealed that the cutting interval influence growth, yield and persistence of the sward (Probst et al., 2011). Slow re-growth of the forages was observed immediately after cutting as the plants had few leaves to intercept light for photosynthesis. To ensure improved and sustainable livestock production under the global influence of climate change, forage management strategies that optimizes the quantity and quality of fodder supplies is necessary. A study was therefore conducted to assess the seasonal dry matter (DM) production and nutritional value of seven ( 7) Brachiaria grasses under different cutting intervals in coastal lowlands of Kenya.The study was conducted at Mtwapa and Msabaha in the coastal lowlands. The location, detailed climatic condition and soil characteristics of these sites are given by Ondiko et al. (2016), in these proceedings.Seven (7) Brachiaria grass cultivars: B. brizantha cvs. Marandu, Xaraes, Piata and MG4, B. decumbens cv. Basilisk, B. hybrid cv. Mulato II, B. humidicola cv. Llanero were evaluated. Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) cv. ex-Tozi was included as a control. The experimental design was completely randomized block in a split plot arrangement with four replications. The main plots were cultivars and the sub plots were the cutting frequencies (6, 8 and 12 weeks). The plot size was 5 x 4 m with a 1 m path between plots and 1.5 m between replicates. The seeds were sown in November 2013 in furrows of about 2 cm deep on well prepared seed bed after ploughing and disc harrowing. The inter row spacing was 0.5 m, giving 10 rows in each plot. Triple super phosphate (TSP, 46% P2O5) was applied at the rate of 200 kg/ha prior to sowing of the seeds. The trials were kept free from weeds by hand weeding and slashing within the plots. A standardization cut was carried out in April 2014 at onset of rains which marked the end of the establishment phase. The nitrogenous fertilizer (26% N) was applied at the rate of 100 kg/ha which was done after the standard cut at the onsets of rains.The data recorded were number of plants, tiller number and dry matter at a regrowth period of 6, 8 and 12 weeks after standardization cut. The plot was sub-divided into three plots, and 2 inner rows were sampled leaving a guard row at each side. The number of plants per unit was determined by counting the plants within a 1 x 1 m frame randomly placed over the two rows.Four plants within the central rows were randomly selected for tiller number determination.Immediately after the measurements, fresh biomass production for the re-growth at 6, 8 and 12 weeks were harvested and weighed; sub samples were taken and oven dried at 65 o C to constant weight for DM determination.Crude protein (CP) was determined using micro-Kjeldahl according to the method of Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC, 2000). The acid detergent fibre (ADF), neutral detergent fibre (NDF) digestibility and lignin were analysed according to Van Soest and Robertson, 1980. Ash was determined by heating the samples at 600 o C for 2 hours in a muffle furnace. Total P and Ca were determined according to the methods described by Okalebo et al. (2002).The forage DM yields were grouped into LR and SR seasons for each cultivar and the three harvesting intervals (6, 8 and 12 weeks). Data on plant population, tiller number and mean DM yield per season were statistically evaluated using analysis of variance (SAS, 2010). The means were separated using Tukey's HSD at 5% level of significance.Rainfall and temperature during the experimental period ( 2014 There were differences (P < 0.05) on plant numbers among the Brachiaria grasses in both sites. Generally, the Brachiaria cultivars had more plant numbers at Mtwapa than at Msabaha. At Mtwapa, Llanero had consistently the highest number of plants in all the seasons but differed (P < 0.05) from all the other Brachiaria cultivars only in LR 2014 (Table 1). In LR 2014 it had 40 plants/m 2 and declined to 20.5 plants/m 2 in SR 2014 and further to 13.3 plants/m 2 in SR 2015.Mulato II had the lowest plant numbers in all the seasons. At Msabaha, Llanero had the highest plant numbers in LR 2014 while in the other seasons none of the cultivars had consistently the highest plant numbers (Table 1). Like in Mtwapa plant number declined over time for all Brachiaria cultivars except Mulato II where they remained fairly stable. However, plant number declined with increasing cutting interval from 6 to 12 weeks at both sites (Table 2). There was variation in the numbers of tillers among the Brachiaria grass cultivars in all seasons.Overall, the Brachiaria cultivars had more tillers during the LR seasons than in the SR seasons at both sites. At Mtwapa, Mulato II maintained the highest number of tillers in all the seasons (Table 3). Rhodes grass recorded lowest number of tillers compared with all the other Brachiaria grasses except in SR 2015. At Msabaha, Mulato II had consistently the highest number of tillers in LR 2014, SR 2014 and LR 2015 and was among the Brachiaria with the highest number of tillers in SR 2015 (Table 3). Piata and Llanero tended to have the lowest number of tillers in most of the seasons. There was no definite trend on number of tillers by increasing cutting interval from 6 to 12 weeks; the number either increased on declined in different season (Table 4). There was a significant interaction between Brachiaria cultivar and cutting interval on DM yield at Mtwapa. The DM yield increased for all the Brachiaria cultivars with increased cutting interval from 6 to 8 weeks during LR 2014 season except for Xaraes and Rhodes grass where yield declined. At 12 weeks the yield remained relatively the same or declined marginally for some cultivars (Figure 2). In SR 2014 season, DM yield were highest at 6 and 8 week cutting interval and declined at 12 weeks cutting interval. In both LR 2015 and SR 2015, yield increased with increasing cutting interval from 6 to 8 weeks but at 12 weeks the yield either remained relatively the same or declined significantly for some of the Brachiaria grasses. None of the Brachiaria out yielded the others in LR 2015 but in SR 2015 Llanero had highest yield at 12 weeks cutting interval. Mulato II, Piata, MG4, and Marandu tended to have the attained the highest yield in most of the season.Seasonal DM yield (kg ha -1 ) of grasses at Mtwapa in coastal lowlands of Kenya.Like in Mtwapa, there was also a significant interaction between Brachiaria cultivars and cutting interval on DM yield at Msabaha. However there was no distinct trend on DM yield by increasing cutting interval across seasons. In LR 2014, there were large variation in yield among the Brachiaria grasses at 6 and 8 weeks cutting interval but at 12 weeks yield were almost similar (Figure 3). In SR 2014 yield tended to higher at 6 and 8 weeks cutting interval and declined at 12 weeks for all the Brachiaria grasses. In LR 2015, increasing cutting interval from 6 to 8 week resulted in increased DM yield for all the Brachiaria but at 12 weeks cutting interval, yield declined considerably. In SR 2015 yield were relatively low (<2000 kg/ha) for all the Brachiaria in all cutting interval. The crude protein was generally low (5.3 -7.7% of DM) and was similar among the Brachiaria grass cultivars and also to Rhodes grass and Napier grass. There were differences (P < 0.05) in ADF, NDF, digestibility, ash and Ca content. Rhodes grass had the highest ADF and NDF compared with the other the Brachiaria grasses but was only significantly (P<0.05) different from Mulato II (Table 5). Napier grass had the highest DMD (57.6%) but was only higher (P < 0.05) than Basilisk, Xaraes and Rhodes grass. Rhodes grass had higher Ca than Piata, MG4, Basilisk and Llanero. Increasing cutting interval from 6 to 12 weeks resulted in decreasing CP content and DMD but the fibres increased (Table 6). The study demonstrated variation in tiller development and productivity among the Brachiaria grasses. Basilisk and Llanero produced high plant number among the cultivars in all the cutting intervals. The number of tiller increased with frequent cutting interval as observed by Onyeonagu et al. (2005a). The effect of rainfall on forage yields in the coastal lowlands was demonstrated with higher yield recorded during the LR season when the rainfall was high. The DM yields at Msabaha were 46% lower than those obtained at Mtwapa and this was attributed to the lower rainfall at that site. Msabaha is located in CL4 which receives less rainfall than CL3 where Mtwapa is located. The total rainfall at Mtwapa during the LR 2014 was 851 mm compared to 592 mm at Msabaha while in SR 2015 rainfall at Mtwapa (289 mm) was twice that of Msabaha (136 mm).Among the tested grasses Mulato II, Piata, Marandu and Xaraes showed outstanding potential as a forage plant in coastal lowlands since it has shown that it can grow under low rainfall maintaining high yields. More tillers were reported for Mulato II at Mtwapa and in Msabaha.The grasses at the 8 week interval have had developed stems and leaf photosynthetic area, resulting into higher dry matter production (Vinther, 2006). The current results are in agreement with Vinther (2006) who found that harvest interval affects productivity, partly through changes in their morphological development. DM production is thus related to harvest frequency.The CP content was general low in all the Brachiaria grasses (5.3 -7.7%) compared with mean of 7-10% reported by Nguku et al. (2015) in the semi-arid region of eastern Kenya. However, the CP of 7.7% content from Basilisk was relatively higher compared with that reported by Evitayani et al. (2004a). The high temperatures at Mtwapa could have contributed to plants having lower CP than expected as temperatures have been reporded to have effect of quality of grasses (Njarui et al., 2015). The ADF content of Rhodes grass was higher was less digestible than Brachiaria indicating that Brachiaria grasses are superior to Rhodes grass. As ADF increased, the DMD declined and this is consistent with work of Albayrak et al. (2011) who reported that as the ADF increases the digestibility of the forage usually decrease causing consumption of the forage by animal to decrease. However, the stage at which the grass is harvested may have positive or negative impact on quality. As reported by Bruinenberg et al. (2002), at a given harvest date, the differences in digestibility of DM of grasses may occur because of differences in the phenological stage.Based on this research, it can be concluded that the cutting intervals can affect the forage DM yield and nutritive values of Brachiaria grasses. Cutting 8 weeks interval could be the optimal level for harvesting Brachiaria grass since the quality forage is high and yield are not compromised. The forages should be fed to ruminant livestock to determine animal responses in terms of production of milk, meat and animal health.Dairy farming is an important enterprise for the livelihoods of many households in Kenya, as a source of income and employment (Thorpe et al., 2000). In western Kenya, cattle also play an important role, as a source draught power and provide manure for crop production.Unfortunately, in many small-scale farms in this region, inadequate and poor quality feeds are among major constraints to dairy production in the zero-grazing system (Orodho, 2007). In most cases particularly during the dry seasons, the cut and carry systems in the integrated croplivestock systems becomes unsustainable and cattle are left to graze freely. One approach to achieve increased livestock production in western Kenya where the soils have inherent low soil fertility (Okalebo et al., 2006) is through introduction of high quality forages. Such forages must be adapted to biotic and abiotic factors such as soil fertility, climatic conditions and resilience to continuous defoliation. Brachiaria grass a perennial grass native to East and Central Africa is widely grown in South America to sustain the dairy and beef industries (Maass et al., 2015). Improved Brachiaria grasses are exceptionally tolerant to aluminum toxicity due to acidity and drought (Miles et al., 2004) and could play a role in integrated crop-livestock systems in the humid highlands of western Kenya where soils are acidic.Previous studies reported by Njarui and Wandera, 2004;Nguku et al., 2016 on adaptability of Brachiaria cultivars in semi-arid regions showed that a number of Brachiaria cultivars produced more dry matter than commonly cultivated Rhodes grass. Elsewhere in Kiboko, Kenya, cv. Mulato-II was found to be superior to native range grasses such as Buffel (Cenchrus ciliaris) and horsetail grass (Chloris roxburghiana) in both primary dry matter production and subsequent regrowth under irrigation (Machogu, 2013). Additionally the grass had higher nutritive quality but was heavily infested by red spider mites. However, little information is available on their adaptability of this grass in the humid region of western Kenya. The objective of the study was therefore to evaluate the establishment and early growth of selected Brachiaria grass cultivars in the humid highlands of western Kenya.The experiments were conducted in three sites, Kitale, Alupe and Eldoret in the western region of Kenya. They lie in different agro-ecological zones with different rainfall and temperature regimes (Table 1). Rainfall in Kitale is unimodal and occurs from April to November while in Alupe and Eldoret is bimodal. The dominant soils in Alupe and Eldoret are classified as Rhodic Ferralsols that are well drained, shallow to moderately deep with very low water retention capacity (WRB, 2006). In Kitale the soil are characterized by weak to moderate structure, low fertility and low organic matter content (WRB, 2006). Selected initial physical and chemical soil properties in the study sites are presented in Table 2. The treatments consisted of seven Brachiaria grass cultivars; Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk, B. humidicola cvs. Llanero and Humidicola, B. brizantha cvs. Marandu, MG4, Piatã, Xaraes and B. hybrid cv. Mulato II., Two commonly cultivated local grasses, Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) and Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Kakamega 1) were included as control. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Prior to sowing of the seed, triple super phosphate (TSP, 46 % P2O5) fertilizer was applied in the furrows at a rate of 40 kg P ha -1 . The grasses were sown in June 2014 in plot sizes of 4 m x 5 m. The seeds were manually drilled in the furrows at an inter row spacing of 0.5 m, at rate of 5 kg ha -1 while 3 root splits of Napier grass were planted in holes 15 cm deep at a spacing of 1 m within and between rows. All the plots were kept weed free throughout the experimental period by hand weeding. In this study, the establishment period was considered to be the 14 weeks after seedling emergence (WAE). Plant parameters (plant height, plot cover and plant spread) were recorded at 8, 12 and 14 WAE. The spread was measured from one edge to the other of the four plants using a meter ruler while the plant height was measured on the primary shoots from the base of the plant top-most leaf. Plot cover was determined using a quadrat of 1 m x1 m subdivided into 25 squares of 0.2 m x 0.2 m as described by Njarui and Wandera (2004) while Napier grass cover was determined using the dot method as described by Sarrantonio (1991). At the end of establishment period, the grasses were harvested for dry matter yield determination.Harvesting of plant was carried out from 2 m x 2 m net plots at a cutting height of 5 cm above ground. Samples of fresh shoots biomass were recorded, and approximately 500g subsamples were dried at 65°C to constant weight in forced-air drier and weighed.Data on height, plot cover, spread and dry matter yield were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effects of grass cultivars at different growth stages using a general linear model (SAS, 2003) separately for each site. The grass cultivars and replications were considered as fixed factors. Mean differences were evaluated by computing least signifcance difference (LSD). Pearson correlation was performed to determine the relationships between the shoots dry matter yield and growth parameters (tiller numbers, plant height, spread and cover) using statistix 10 package (Statistix, 2003). The means of the growth parameters (height, cover and spread) during the establishment period in Eldoret are presented in Table 3. There were significant (p < 0.05) differences in spread, cover and height among the grasses. Napier grass recorded significantly higher mean plant heights, spread and cover than all the Brachiaria cultivars. Napier grass being a fodder crop and gigantic in nature would naturally show greater advantage in terms of growth characteristic than other grasses when the environment is favorable (Orodho, 2007;Nguku et al., 2016). However, plant height did not differ significantly (P < 0.05) among the Brachiaria grasses but Basilisk spread more than Xaraes at 12 WAE and had higher cover than MG4 at 12 WAE.The growth parameters (tillers, spread, cover and height) during establishment stage varied significantly (p<0.05) among the grass cultivars in Kitale. Napier grass recorded higher (P<0.05) plant heights and cover than all the Brachiaria cultivars (Table 4). At 8 and 12 WAE, Brachiaria cultivars gave similar plant heights which were not significantly different from Rhodes grass. However, at the end of establishment period, MG4 and Basilisk recorded significantly higher plant heights than Rhodes grass and most of the Brachiaria cultivars. The cv. Llanero had the lowest plant height (3.5 cm) and this was attributed to its spreading growth characteristic (Nguku et al., 2016) unlike the other cultivars that are more erect. The highest cover was recorded in cv. MG4 (51.1%) at 12 WAE and Xaraes (58.5%) at 4 WAE which and was significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of all the other Brachiaria cultivars. The cvs. MG4, Basilisk and Xaraes gave significantly higher cover than Rhodes grass while Marandu, Mulato II, Llanero and Humidicola recorded similar cover with Rhodes grass. The erect growth habit of MG4 and decumbent growth characteristic of Basilisk explains why they had greater heights and cover during the establishment.During the early growth stages (8WAE), the heights of all Brachiaria cultivars except Basilisk did not differ significantly with the height of Rhodes grass (Table 5). However, at 12 and 14 WAE all Brachiaria cultivars recorded significantly lower heights than Rhodes and Napier grass. The cvs. Llanero, Humidicola, Marandu and Mulato II recorded the lowest heights while Basilisk, MG4, Piata and Xaraes were the tallest. Plant spread differed significantly (p < 0.05) among the Brachiaria cultivars. Napier grass recorded the highest spread compared to all the Brachiaria cultivars at 8 and 12 WAE but at 14 WAE, plant spread in all Brachiaria cultivars except Xaraes and Mulato II were similar to that of Napier grass. Basilisk recorded the highest plant spread at 14 WAE while Rhodes grass recorded the lowest plant spread. At 8 and 12 WAE, Napier grass recorded significantly higher plant cover than all Brachiaria cultivars but at 14 WAE, the plant cover for Napier grass was not significantly different from that of Basilisk, Xaraes and Marandu. Piata, MG4, Mulato II, Humidicola and Llanero showed low plot cover during this period and were similar to that of Rhodes grass at the end of establishment period. The mean DMY for the grasses are presented in Figure 2, 3 and 4. Dry matter yield varied significantly (p < 0.0001) among the grass cultivars in all the sites. In Eldoret, Brachiaria cultivars had significant (p < 0.05) lower DMY than Napier grass (Figure 2). The cv. Xaraes gave significantly (p < 0.05) higher DMY (2.54 t ha -1 ) than Marandu (1.56 t ha -1 ) and Piata (1.83 t ha -1 ).In Kitale, cv. MG4 had the highest DMY (3.7 t ha -1 ) while Mulato II had the lowest (0.37 t ha -1 ) but the yield were significantly lower than those of Napier grass (9.9 t ha -1 ). However, cv. MG4 yielded more than Rhodes grass (Figure 3). In Alupe site, Basilisk and Xaraes were the most productive grasses and yielded 4.7 and 3.9 t ha -1 , respectively. However DMY were not significantly different from that of Napier grass (5.2 t ha -1 ) but were higher than that of Rhodes grass (1.8 t ha -1 ) (Figure 4). The higher DMY in Alupe was attributed to a warmer (23.8 -30.7 o C), humid and high rainfall during establishment (97.5 -198.6 mm) between July -December 2014 during the establishment period (Figure 1). At Alupe and Kitale most Brachiaria cultivars showed upright growth characteristics, whereas in Eldoret the same cultivars showed a spreading growth habit which possibly had a positive effect on DMY production in Alupe and Kitale.A significant linear relationship (R 2 = 0.60 -0.96; P < 0.001) occurred between the plant height and DMY in Kitale and Alupe site while in Eldoret DMY was positively and strongly correlated with plot cover (R 2 = 0.94; P < 0.001). Mganga, 2009 andNguku et al., 2016 observed that pasture species which grow fast and tall are more efficient in utilization of resources and therefore, are more competitive and likely to have higher biomass production. Among the Brachiaria cultivars, Basilisk, MG4 and Xaraes were the tallest and had the largest cover (> 50%) at the end of establishment period. Basilisk has extensive roots system (Bulo et al., 1994;Guenni et al., 2002), aggressive growth habit, dense cover and utilizes nitrogen efficiently (Loch, 1997). Xaraes is reported to have greater leaf and stem elongation rates and higher leaf blade which results to higher biomass production since the stem is the structural component with higher weight than leaves (Rodrigues et al., 2014). The cv. MG4 spread more and this contributed to higher DMY. The low yield of Humidicola and Mulato II was attributed to the slow establishment. Several authors (Bauer et al., 2010, Mutimura andEverson, 2012;Nguku et al., 2016) have previously reported high DMY production in Mulato II and attributed it to large leaves sizes. However, the range of DMY of 0.4 -1.6 t ha -1 obtained in this study for Mulato II was far below the DMY (4.1 t ha -1 ) reported by Nguku et al., (2016) from trials in the semi-arid eastern Kenya.Observations made in all sites showed that Mulato II had higher incidences of spider mites attack as was previously reported in trials in Kiboko by Machogu, (2013). This infestation probably contributed to reduced biomass. Among the Brachiaria cultivars, Basilisk, MG4, Xaraes and Piata established successfully and attained the highest spread, cover and were tallest. The productivity of these grasses after establishment is presented elsewhere in this proceeding. Poor nutrition caused by inadequate quantity and low quality of feeds is a major constraint to livestock productivity not only in the semi-arid Kenya (Njarui and Wandera, 2004) but also in the humid regions of western Kenya (Amiani, 2011). Due to the high population in western Kenya (360 inhabitants km -2 ), land holding per household is declining and natural pastures are diminishing at an alarming rate (Amiani, 2011;De Groote et al., 2008). In addition, most soils in this region are acidic and highly deficient in plant nutrients (Kifuko- Koech et al., 2012) which when combined with fluctuating rainfall due to climate change negatively affect crop-livestock production systems (Amiani, 2011;GOK, 2013). With exception of few large scale farmers who graze their livestock on natural pastures, most small scale farmers have adopted cut-and-carry feed systems (Franzel and Wambugu, 2007). In Uasin Gishu and Trans Nzoia counties, the common practice is feeding ground maize stalks after the grains are harvested and this accelerates soil nutrient mining. Further, the quality of natural grasses (CP-2-4%) (Thairu and Tessema, 1987) and maize stover (4-7%) (Hancock, 2009) is below the reported minimum CP requirement of 6-8% for livestock maintenance (Minson, 1981). Napier grass which is the most commonly grown fodder grass by dairy farmers in western Kenya is at risk of Napier stunting disease which is causing a big economic loss (Orodho, 2006). Despite the challenges of limiting livestock feed in this region, most farmers are shifting to livestock production due to declining maize yields as a result of maize lethal necrosis menace (Mahuku et al., 2015). Therefore, to alleviate the problem of feed shortage, inclusion of alternative high quality grass cultivars with high dry matter production is key in enhancing livestock production in western Kenya.One such promising grass is Brachiaria which originate from African origin (Boonman, 1993). Despite Africa being the centre of origin and diversity, use of Brachiaria species in pasture improvement particularly in Kenya has been limited to few cultivars that are susceptible to biotic and abiotic challenges (Maass et al., 2015). Past studies have identified Brachiaria cultivars that are well adapted to semi arid agro-ecological zones and their best cutting strategies (Njarui and Wandera, 2004). However, productivity and persistence of some of these promising cultivars under different cutting regimes in humid regions of western Kenya have not been evaluated. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the effects of cutting frequency on, dry matter yield (DMY) and quality of Brachiaria cultivars in different agro ecological zones in western Kenya.The experiments were conducted at three sites; Kitale, Eldoret and Alupe in western Kenya. The geographical location, detailed climatic conditions and soils charateristics of these sites are given by Kifuko- Koech et al. (2016), in these proceedings.Eight Brachiaria grasses: Brachiaria brizantha cvs. Marandu, Xaraes, Piata, MG4, B. decumbens, cv. Basilisk, B. humidicola cvs. Llanero and Humidicola and Brachiaria hybrid cv. Mulato II were evaluated. They were compared with one control grass; Rhodes grass. The experimental design was completely randomized block in a split plot arrangement with four replications. The main plots were grass cultivars and the sub-plots were the cutting frequency (6, 8 and 12 weeks). Plot sizes were 4 m x 5 m with a 1 m space between plots and replications.A fine seed bed was prepared and furrows of about 2 cm for sowing seeds were dug using hand hoes. Triple super phosphate (TSP, 46 % P2O5) fertilizer was applied to the furrows at a rate of 40 kg P ha -1 . Thereafter, seeds were manually drilled in the furrows at a rate of 5 kg ha -1 with an inter row spacing of 0.5 m, giving 10 rows in each plot and covered with a thin layer of soil. The plots were kept weed free throughout the experiment by hand weeding. After standardization cut which was conducted at 14 weeks after seedling emergency, the plots were split into three equal portions and allocated the three cutting frequency at random i.e. 6, 8 and 12 weeks intervals. Data collection was conducted during two dry and one wet seasons (Table 1.) Plant number, tillers, height, spread and plot covers were monitored at all cutting intervals from 1 m x 1 m quadrant. In addition DMY was determined at all cutting intervals from an effective area of 2m 2 . At each harvest, samples of shoots biomass were weighed fresh, and a subsample taken and dried at 60°C to a constant weight and weighed. Dry matter yield for each season was determined by summing up all the harvest within each season for each cut, separately.At harvest, the herbage was analysed for nutritive quality. Subsamples were dried at 60•C for 48 h and ground to pass a 1-mm sieve. Ash was determined by heating the samples at 550 o C for 2 hours in a muffle furnace. Crude protein (CP) was determined using micro-Kjeldahl according to the method of Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC, 2000). Neutral Detergent Fibre (NDF), Acid Detergent Fibre (ADF) and Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL) were determined using Ankom method of Van Soest et al. (1991). The organic matter digestibility (OMD) was determined according to the procedure of Goering and Van Soest (1970).The DMY data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effects of grass cultivars and cutting frequency using a general linear model (SAS, 2001) with treatments and replications considered as fixed factors separately for each site. Mean differences were evaluated by computing least significance difference (LSD at P < 0.05). Pearson correlation was performed to determine the relationships between the herbage DMY and growth parameters using statistix 10 package (Statistix, 2003). There was no significant interaction between grass cultivars and cutting frequency on DMY at Eldoret. However significant difference was recorded among the cultivars and on cutting frequency. Establishment of Rhodes grass was slow and no DMY was recorded during the first dry season. During the first dry season, Basilisk, MG4 and Xaraes gave comparable and significant higher DMY than Piata and Marandu. In the wet season, all Brachiaria cultivars except Mulato II recorded significant higher DMY (10.3-14.3 t ha -1 ) than Rhodes grass (7.6 t ha -1 ). Significant effects on cutting interval on DMY occurred in the second dry and wet seasons.Increasing cutting interval from 6 to 12 reduced DMY during the dry season (Figure 4). However, in the wet season, delaying harvesting to 8 weeks did not show significant gain but delaying further to 12 weeks resulted to increased DMY.There were significant interaction between Brachiaria cultivars and cutting interval on DMY in all the season. During the first dry season, yield of the Brachiaria cultivars were similar in all cutting interval (Table 3). However Rhodes grass produced more yield than all the cultivars at 8 week cutting interval. In the wet season, generally increasing cutting interval increased yield for all the Brachiaria cultivars. In the second dry season, increasing cutting interval from 6 to 8 week increased the DMY yield marginally for most of the cultivars and was not significant.Mulato II had the highest yield in all the cutting intervals.Like Kitale, there were significant interaction between Brachiaria cultivars and cutting interval on DMY in all the season. However, during the second dry season, Rhodes grass succumbed to drought and no DMY was recorded. In first dry season, there was no definite trend on cutting interval on yield while in the wet season and second dry season, increasing cutting interval increased the DMY marginally (Table 4). Llanero recorded higher DMY when cut at 8 intervals than other cultivars including Rhodes grass during the first wet season while Xaraes had the highest yield when cut at 12 week interval. The relationships between growth parameters and total DMY in Eldoret are shown in Table 5.Total DMY was strongly and positively influenced by cover (R 2 = 0.60, p < 0.001) and height (R 2 = 0.59, p < 0.001). The total DMY was however weakly but positively correlated with plant tillers and spread while plant number had no effect on DMY. In Kitale, total DMY was positively and significantly correlated with plant spread (R 2 =0.48, p<0.001) and plant cover (R 2 =0.42, p<0.001).A weak but positive correlation between DMY with height and tillers was observed but plant number did not significantly influence DMY. In Alupe, total DMY was significantly and positively correlated with, cover, tillers and spread (R 2 = 0.43 -0.63, p<0.001) in order of importance while plant height had a significant but negative effect on DMY production. No significant relationship occurred between DMY and plant number. There was no significant interaction between cultivars and cutting interval on the parameter analyzed for the nutritive quality. However, the CP, ADF, NDF and OMD differed among the cultivars. All the Brachiaria cultivars except MG4 had significantly higher CP content (12.9-16.2%) than Rhodes grass (10.3%) (Table 8). Mulato II accumulated the highest CP content while MG4 had the lowest. All the Brachiaria cultivars except Xaraes and Piata recorded significant lower NDF than Rhodes grass and consequently were more digestible than Rhodes grass.Increasing the cutting intervals to 12 weeks significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the CP and OMD concentrations (Figure 5). No significant differences on CP and OMD were observed when the harvesting was conducted at either 6 or 8 weeks intervals (Figure 5). Total production over the year showed that most Brachiaria cultivars particularly in Eldoret and Alupe out yielded Rhodes grass which was an indication that the former is a good alternative to Rhodes grass in western Kenya. Rhodes grass was however well adapted to Kitale possibly due to the humid climate throughout the year. Most Brachiaria cultivars in Kitale and Eldoret gave total DMY within the range reported by Hare et al., (2009) in Thailand. Low DMY production in Alupe was attributed to poor distribution of rainfall, low inherent soil fertility (Nitrogen-0.12%, carbon-1.12%, Olsen P-2ppm P) and slow grass recovery after dry spells (Omondi, 2013). Crude protein for all Brachiaria cultivars was well above 7% which is considered critical for livestock production (Milford and Minson, 1966). This study clearly demonstrated that Brachiaria cultivars have higher nutritive value and are more productive relative to Rhodes grass particularly during the dry season.Effect of cutting frequency on DMY production in this study was variable. Whereas, cutting Brachiaria cultivars at shorter intervals (6 or 8 weeks) during the dry season resulted in significant higher DMY in Eldoret and Alupe, in Kitale prolonging the cutting interval to 12 weeks resulted in greater DMY accumulation. Due to close proximity of Kitale to Mt Elgon, the site receives rains in most parts of the year which ensures continuous growth of grass and this explain why increasing cutting intervals resulted to higher DMY during the dry season. During the wet season, increasing the cutting intervals to 12 weeks gave significant higher DMY irrespective of the sites. Results on effects of harvesting intervals on grass herbage accumulation have been variable in most parts of the world. In Florida, Vendramini et al (2014), while working on Mulato II and Cayman found no difference in herbage accumulation between 3and 6-week regrowth intervals in the first period but greater accumulation for 3 week than 6 week regrowth interval in the second period. In Thailand, Hare et al., (2013) while working with Brachiaria hybrids found that extending cutting intervals to 90 days greatly increased DM production but reduced CP concentrations. He further noted that cutting at 30 day intervals would produce CP levels 3 -4 percentage point higher than cutting at 45 and 60 days intervals. For many grasses, longer regrowth intervals result in greater herbage accumulation (Interrante et al., 2009) and results of this study therefore support conclusion of other authors (Hare et al., 2013;Njarui and Wandera, 2004).This study has demonstrated that the most promising Brachiaria cultivars are Basilisk, MG4, Piata and Xaraes across sites while Llanero performed well in Alupe. Generally, Mulato II had higher nutritive value than all Brachiaria cultivars in Kitale. Cutting Brachiaria cultivars at shorter intervals (6 or 8 weeks) during the dry season resulted to significant higher DMY in Eldoret and Alupe. In Kitale, extending cutting interval to 12 weeks gave higher DMY but reduced CP and OMD during the dry season. Cutting at 8 weeks intervals resulted in high proportions of CP and lower NDF. This study clearly demonstrated that Brachiaria cultivars have higher nutritive value and are more productive than Rhodes grass. To maximize production and quality, cutting Brachiaria at 8 weeks intervals is recommended.Livestock production is one of the most important agricultural land use systems in the world, with grasslands covering 25% of land surface and contributing to the livelihoods of more than 800 million people (Steinfeld et al., 2006). However, the Kenyan dairy industry is threatened by seasonal forage production of low nutritional quality. Excess forage production is experienced during the rainy season but more often, acute shortages occur in the dry season (Njarui et al., 2016). The abundant natural forages relied upon by farmers is not sufficient to satisfy animal requirements especially in the dry season when biomass production decreases by 25 -50% and crude protein levels reduce significantly (Penning de Vries and Djiteye, 1982). Soil nutrient depletion and improper management of improved forages exacerbates the problem leading to soil degradation and reduced livestock production.Forage grass production is influenced by the varietal potential including growth and development processes within the grass and soil nutrient availability. Grasses have a relatively high demand for nutrients. McKenzie (2005) for example reported that most hay grasses in Alberta removed an average of 14-18 kg nitrogen (N) and 1.8 kg of phosphorus (P) per ton of dry matter. However, the amounts of nutrients removal vary depending on the grass species and the seasonal conditions. High nutrient uptake and removal occur in the wet seasons due to increased nutrient availability in soil solution. Productivity of forages is limited by low soil fertility especially in the low pH and N and P deficient soils that are common in the north western highlands of Kenya. Nitrogen is an important element in grass production due to its role in photosynthesis and influence in the chlorophyll molecule (Oliveira et al. 2010). Where available N from soil is not sufficient for forage production, application of fertilizer N may provide immediate responses in forage grasses (Batista et al., 2014). Silveira et al. (2015) working with different N rates (0, 60 and 120 kg ha -1 per year) on Paspalum notatum for a period of three years, observed that the dry matter yields increased linearly with application rates of N. However, responses to P have only been reported in the season of application during grass establishment due to the role of P in roots formation but not in later seasons. Higher nutrient removal is reported in improved grasses than indigenous grass species though some grasses have also been bred for low soil fertility regions (Rao et al., 1993).Brachiaria grasses though indigenous to East Africa, have been recently introduced in Kenya. The introduction of these grasses into the smallholder farming systems of north western highlands, necessitates, proper soil fertility management and an understanding of its nutritional requirements for pasture management. Studies on the fertilizer needs of Brachiaria grasses in the low fertility soils in the region is therefore necessary in order to increase the production of feeds for higher milk and meat production per unit of area. In the previous studies, Miles and Lapointe, (1992) reported good performance of B. humidicola in infertile soils of Carimagua, while B. ruziensis performed better in relatively fertile clay loam soils due to its high N demand (Humphreys et al., 1988). The objective the study was to assess the effects of N and P fertilizers on the shoots and roots biomass of seven Brachiaria cultivars in north western highlands of Kenya. We hypothesized that the shoots and roots biomass of Brachiaria grasses is increased by N and P fertilization in nutrient depleted soils, and the response is also dependent on the season.The experiment were conducted in the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) Kitale and at the University of Eldoret farms, located in Trans Nzoia and Uasin Gishu Counties respectively within the north western highlands of Kenya. The KALRO Kitale site (1° 0′ 6.6´´N and 34° 59´ 10´´E) lies within the Upper Midlands (UM) 4 agroecological zone at 1890 m asl. The site has a cool and temperate climate with average annual temperatures ranging between 10 and 27 0 C and a mean annual precipitation of 1100 mm, making it reliable for rain fed agriculture. The rainfall is unimodal and starts from April to December. The soils are mainly humic Acrisols (FAO, 2008;Jones et al., 2013), which have low fertility, are deficient in N and P, have a weak to moderate sub-angular blocky structure and low organic matter. They are well drained with high moisture storage capacity.The University of Eldoret site lies between 1°0´6.6´´N and 34°59´10´´E at an elevation of 2073 m asl in the Lower Highland (LH) 3 agro-ecological zone which covers 58% of the county. Eldoret receives a unimodal rainfall between April and November with averages of 900 mm. Since the area has no distinct dry and wet seasons, the dry season in this study was considered as the periods with lower rainfall amounts (October to April). Temperature ranges between 7 and 29⁰C, making the area favorable for fodder and livestock production. The soils are underlain by murram, well drained, shallow to moderately deep and with dark red friable clay of petroplinthite. They are classified as Rhodic Ferralsols and are low in soil pH (<5.5), N and P contents, moisture storage capacity and prone to Al toxicity (Kisinyo, 2011;NAAIAP and KARI, 2014).Soil samples were collected prior to commencement of the trials using a soil auger. Samples were taken using a W-pattern from four depths: 0 -15 cm, 15 -30 cm, 30 -60 cm, and 60 -100 cm thoroughly mixed and a sub sample was taken from each depth for each block. After air drying, the samples were gently crushed to pass through a 2-mm sieve. Available P (Mehlick III), exchangeable K, Ca, Mg and total N were estimated after wet digestion with H2O2/H2SO4 as described by Okalebo et al. (2002). Total Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , and K + were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry and P measured as described by Murphy and Riley (1962). Soil pH was measured in water (soil: water ratio of 1: 2.5) using a pH meter with a glass and reference calomel electrode (Model pH 330 SET-1, 82362). Soils were vertically sampled using stainless steel rings (diameter 10 cm) for different depths; resulting in undisturbed soil samples for bulk density determination as described by Blake and Hartge (1986). The samples were dried at 65ºC to a constant weight to allow soil bulk density determination. All determinations were made in triplicate and expressed on a dry weight basis.The soils were deeper in Kitale (>100 cm) than Eldoret (up to 50cm). Soil depth is an indicator of volume of water storage and extent of root growth expected in the soil especially for deep rooted forage grasses (Bengough et al. 2016). Low soil depth coupled with low water storage capacity of Ferralsols (Jones et al., 2013) could hinder growth of grasses with extensive deep roots systems in Eldoret. The bulk density ranged from 1.34 to 1.49 g cm -3 and between 1.29 to 1.35 g cm -3 in Kitale and Eldoret, respectively. The bulk density were within the normal range (<1.5 g/cm 3 ) that doesn't restrict root growth in soil as proposed by Hunt and Gilkes (1992). Soils were generally medium acidic in both sites, but slightly more acidic in the 30 -60 cm depth in Kitale (Table 1). The soils were mainly deficient in N, available P and Zn with nutrient levels decreasing with depth in both sites. The soil are generally low in organic C ranging from 0.2 -0.3% in both sites. However, K, Ca, Mg and Mn were adequate in both sites. The seeds were drilled in a well prepared land at 5 kg ha -1 for Brachiaria and 10 kg ha -1 for Rhodes grass in 2 cm deep furrows and an inter-row spacing of 0.5 m. Root splits of Napier grass were planted at 1 m x 0.5 m spacing. Minimum tillage was practiced throughout the growth period to encourage maximum root growth. After full establishment phase (14 weeks after seedling emergence-WAE) a standardization cut was made to stimulate uniform plant growth. Subsequent harvests were carried out after every 8 weeks. During the harvest, the grass was cut at 5 cm above the ground within inner 4 m 2 using sickles. The fresh herbage was weighed, and a subsample taken, and then dried at 60°C to constant weight for determination of shoots biomass. The number of tillers from four (4) randomly selected plants within a 1 m x 1 m fixed quadrat frame was counted. Plot cover was determined by counting the number of fully covered subdivisions in a 1 m 2 quadrat (with 25 squares of 0.2 m x 0.2 m each) as described by (Njarui and Wandera, 2004) while in Napier grass, the plot cover was determined according method described by Sarrantonio (1991). Plant height and spread were measured in four (4) randomly chosen plants within a 1 m 2 quadrat. Spread was considered as the width of the widest point while height was taken from the base to the highest flag tip excluding inflorescence.At harvest (22 WAE), subsamples were taken for determination of shoots biomass and nutritive value. After oven drying (60 ºC for 48 hours) and milling, samples were analyzed for digestibility according to the procedure of Goering and Van Soest (1970). Crude protein was determined using micro-Kjeldahl according to the method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC, 2000).Roots biomass assessment was conducted at 22, 46 and 80 WAE, representing one complete season in the area. The roots were sampled using the soil-core method (Bohm, 1979). Four soil cores were randomly sampled using a stainless steel auger at 0 -15 cm and 15 -30cm depths from the intra-and inter-row spacing in each plot. To prevent edge effects, the samples were taken at least 1 m from the edges. The samples from each depth were thoroughly mixed, weighed to determine the total bulk soil weight and a sub sample was collected for moisture correction. The roots contained in the samples were recovered under a tap of running water at low pressure using 2.8 cm and 2 cm mesh sieves (Bohm, 1979). Samples were dried in an airforced oven at 65º C to constant weight and then weighed for determination of dry root weight.The roots biomass was calculated as a factor of the bulk density for each depth.Analysis of variance was undertaken to determine the effects of fertilizer N and P on the shoots and roots biomass of Brachiaria grasses using Statistix 10 package (Statistix, 2003). Means were separated using the Tukey's HD test. Where ANOVA was significant (P≤0.05), Pearson correlation was performed to assess relationships between the shoots and roots biomass and growth parameters including tiller numbers, plant height, spread and cover.During the dry season (October -April), a significant site (P<0.001) and cultivar effect (P<0.001) was noted. The grasses produced higher yields in Kitale (8.9 t ha -1 ) than in Eldoret (4.2 t ha -1 ) mainly due to differences in moisture. The soils in Kitale are mainly Acrisols which have a higher soil water retention due to high accumulation of clay in the lower horizons compared with the Ferralsols in Eldoret. Ferralsols have low water retention capacity, that may lead to stress during dry spells (Jones et al. 2013). Regardless of the sites, fertilizer NP treatments had higher biomass yields (6.8 t ha -1 ) compared to 5.8 t ha -1 in the unfertilized grasses.The shoots biomass were significantly influenced by the grass cultivars (P = 0.001) but not by fertilizer NP (P = 0.26) and no significant interaction between cultivars and fertilizer NP (P = 0.57) were noted during the dry season in Kitale. The lack of response to fertilizer NP during the dry season can be attributed to low nutrient uptake due to low moisture. Among the Brachiaria grasses, Basilisk, MG4 and Marandu accumulated the highest shoots biomass which ranged from 8.9 to 11.2 t ha -1 and was significantly higher (P = 0.05) than the commonly grown Rhodes grass while cvs. Llanero and Mulato II had the lowest shoots biomass (Table 2). However, Napier grass produced between 56 to 106% higher biomass compared with the highest yielding Brachiaria cultivars (Basilisk and MG4) during the dry season. In the wet season, Xaraes and MG4 had the highest biomass yields (16 t ha -1 ) followed by Basilisk > Mulato II > Piata> and Marandu (Table 2). All the Brachiaria cultivars except Llanero produced significantly higher yields than Rhodes grass, while Napier grass out yielded all the grass varieties in the wet season. NS NSWhere-SED-Standard error of difference at p≤ 0.05; NP-fertilizer applied at 40 kg P ha -1 and 50 kg N ha -1 per season; CV -cultivar, NS-Not significant at p≤ 0.05. Means followed by the same letter for a parameter are not significantly different at P≤0.05. Mean separation was done by Tukeys HSD test.During the wet season, all the treatments where N and P was applied produced significantly higher shoots biomass (P=0.05) than those with no fertilizer application (Figure 1). Generally, application of fertilizer NP produced 17% higher shoots biomass than the unfertilized treatments. Among the Brachiaria grasses, MG4 and Xaraes had the highest responses to fertilizer NP with 44.7 and 34.8% increase in yields due to fertilizer addition respectively. These cultivars developed chlorosis in treatments without NP fertilizer throughout the season, while the fertilized treatments showed N deficiencies two months after N application particularly during the high rainfall periods. This indicates that cvs. MG4 and Xaraes had higher N demand than the other cultivars which may not have been satisfied by the rate applied. The cvs. Mulato II, Basilisk and Marandu did not respond to application of NP, and were ever green throughout the season. In grasses, N has a major role in chlorophyll formation and increased vegetative growth, while P is important in roots development. The site had low initial soil N (Table 1); therefore, the grasses with little or no response to NP application could be more efficient in N utilization thereby requiring low N application. Xaraes and MG4 and require N and P fertilization in NP deficient sites to achieve increased production.Figure 1 Influence of fertilizer NP on shoots biomass of Brachiaria grasses during the dry and wet seasons in Kitale. Where: cv-cultivar; SED-standard error of difference at P<0.05Generally, the Brachiaria varieties had significantly higher crude protein than the control grasses (Table 3). Mulato II accumulated the highest amounts of crude protein, followed by Basilisk, Piata and Marandu. Cultivars Llanero and MG4 had the lowest crude protein and were comparable to Napier and Rhodes grass (Table 3). Although Napier grass yield was high in both seasons, its nutritional value was lower than that of the Brachiaria grasses. However, the nutritional values were higher than those reported elsewhere by (Paulino et al., 2011) probably due to the geographical location and environmental conditions for the site. Crude protein is higher, in fodder grown in high rainfall areas while structural carbohydrates (NDF) in the grasses is lower (Peterson et al., 1988).In Eldoret no significant fertilizer (P ≤ 0.05) effect on shoots biomass was noted in the dry and wet seasons despite the low N and available P content in those soils (Table 1). However, the biomass yields were significantly (P = 0.001) influenced by the grass cultivars in the dry season.All the Brachiaria cultivars except cv. Llanero produced similar yields that were significantly (P = 0.05) higher than those of Rhodes grass (Figure 2). Napier grass out-yielded all the grasses and accumulated between 2.4 to 6.5 t ha -1 more shoots biomass than the lowest and highest yielding Brachiaria grasses. During the wet season, the biomass yields were influenced by the grass cultivars, but no interaction between the grass cultivars and fertilizer NP occurred. The cvs. MG4 and Basilisk accumulated the highest shoots biomass (14 t ha -1 ), which was significantly (P=0.05) higher than that of other Brachiaria cultivars and Rhodes grass. However, cvs. Marandu, Piata, Xaraes and cv. Mulato II yielded shoots biomass that was similar to that of Rhodes grass, but higher than cv. Llanero (Figure 2). Napier grass out-yielded all the grasses during this season. The high biomass yield accumulated by cvs. MG4 and Basilisk in the dry and wet seasons in the Eldoret site suggest that these are the best bet Brachiaria cultivars. Roots biomass is important in maintaining soil fertility due to its contribution to C and N sink and as a source of exudates for microbial growth resulting to increased microbial activity within the rhizosphere. Application of fertilizer NP had no effect on roots biomass in all sampling periods. The lack of fertilizer response in roots biomass is partly attributed to low NP rates (40 kg P ha -1 and 100 kg N ha -1 ) that may not have been responsive in these P deficient soils (Table 1). Other studies on effects of fertilization on roots biomass have noted similar results. Kibet et al. (2016) for example found no responses to fertilizer N by switch grass fertilized for 4 years, while Jung et al. (2011) reported increased above ground biomass due to N application but no changes in roots biomass of switch grass. In the current study, accumulation of roots biomass differed across the two depths sampled with 70% of roots biomass located in the 0-15 cm depth. Roots biomass increased with age but reduced with depth. The highest roots biomass was recorded at 80 WAE (Table 4).At 22 WAE, Basilisk, Piata and Xaraes had comparable roots biomass in the 0-15 cm depth, which was higher than that of Rhodes and Napier grass while cvs. Llanero and Mulato II accumulated the lowest roots biomass. The roots system of Basilisk consists of finer and longer roots than some other Brachiaria species providing superior uptake of P and N from the soil. Most of the grasses had very low biomass at the subsoil level (15 -30cm) at 22 WAE. Piata had the highest roots biomass at the 15 -30 cm depth which was between 80 -200% higher than the other grasses. Less abundant roots biomass accumulation was noted in Mulato II, Llanero, Napier and Rhodes grass at the lower depth (Table 4).At 80 WAE, no varietal or fertilizer differences were noted on roots biomass at both the top and lower level but generally, the grasses had higher roots biomass at the 0 -15 cm depth. Roots biomass was 10 times higher in the 15 -30 cm depth from soils sampled 80 WAE compared to those sampled 22 WAE, showing that as the growth period increased, more roots were distributed in the deeper horizons. By this period, the varieties may have attained near maximum lateral growth and utilized most of the soil area available for growth thereby investing more roots growth at the lower soil depths. This is important for C sequestration, since most of the C stored in the roots at the deeper horizons contribute to C sink and is better protected from degradation. At the 80 WAE, the Brachiaria grasses had higher roots biomass at the lower horizons than the controls, Napier and Rhodes grass, making Brachiaria a better alternative for soil fertility restoration.Roots biomass had a significant site x cultivar interaction (P<0.001) at the 22 WAE period in both depths. MG4 had the highest roots biomass in Eldoret (1445 kg ha -1 ) while Xaraes, Piata and Basilisk had higher roots biomass than other grasses in Kitale at the 0-15 m depth. The grasses differed in roots spread beyond the 15 m depth in both sites. At the 15-30 m depth, roots biomass ranged from 113 to 438 kg ha -1 in Kitale and 144 to 460 kg ha -1 in Eldoret. A significant varietal effect (P<0.001) was noted in roots biomass production in Eldoret. In general, all the Brachiaria cultivars had higher roots biomass than the control grass (Napier grass). At 22 WAE, Rhodes grass had not yet fully established due to slow germination and growth in this site, sampling was not done. The cv. MG4 accumulated the highest roots biomass (1445 kg ha -1 ) while Napier grass had the lowest roots biomass (345 kg ha -1 ) in this site (Figure 3). As was observed in the Kitale site, roots biomass in all cultivars decreased with sampling depth, and was higher in the 0 -15 m and lowest at the sub soil (15 -30 m). Beyond the 15 m depth, Xaraes accumulated the highest roots biomass while Mulato II and Basilisk had the lowest accumulation of roots biomass at this depth. Increased roots biomass is essential in plant productivity because in grasses, high roots biomass improves nutrient and water uptake (Bowman et al., 1998) particularly during periods of water scarcity. Xaraes, MG4, Piata and Basilisk had high roots biomass in both sites and accumulated higher shoots biomass than the other grasses especially during the dry season. Biomass investment in shoots and roots differed between Napier grass and the Brachiaria cultivars.Napier grass invested up to 20 times more biomass in shoots than roots in Kitale and nearly 10 times in Eldoret. The lower investment in Kitale would be due to sufficient moisture which encouraged higher shoots growth at the expense of roots. In Eldoret, soil depth and moisture was limiting leading to higher roots biomass to scavenge for water and nutrients. The Brachiaria cultivars had comparatively lower investment in shoots: roots biomass, which ranged between 1.2 to 2.1 and 2.5 to 5.0 in Eldoret and Kitale, respectively. In Kitale, shoots biomass was strongly and positively correlated with plot cover and plant spread (P=0.001) and was also positively but weakly correlated with plant height (Table 5).Cultivars that had wider spread and high plot cover such as Basilisk and MG4 accumulated higher biomass during the dry season. The number of tillers and roots biomass did not influence the shoots biomass in the dry season.The relationship between grass growth parameters and shoots yield in Eldoret are shown in Table 6. It was observed that during the dry season, shoots biomass was dependent on plant spread, height and cover but had no relationship with plant height, tiller density or roots biomass. A significant linear relationship (R 2 = 0.491; P = 0.001) was observed between plant spread and shoots biomass. Plot cover plays a major role in soil and water conservation. In this study, Basilisk, MG4, Xaraes and Piata were more decumbent, with high spread and plot over (60%) thereby accumulating higher biomass in the dry season. However, the erect grasses, Rhodes grass and Mulato II had low plot over (45%), and plant spread (24 m), which contributed to lower shoots biomass during the dry season. Mganga (2009) reported similar results, with Cenchrus ciliaris producing higher biomass among four local grasses due to increased horizontal spread. During the wet season, grass spread, cover and height were the most important growth parameters influencing shoots biomass, with spread and cover having the highest significant linear relationship with shoots biomass in Eldoret (Table 6). Therefore, the grasses that had more spread and higher plot cover accumulated more biomass including MG4 and Basilisk. In general, results from this study show that shoots biomass varied considerably depending on the cultivar and the site. Fertilizer NP response was minimal despite the low soil N and P in both sites. The shoots biomass was mainly influenced by the spread and plot cover attributes both in the dry and wet seasons. Brachiaria cultivars out-yielded Rhodes grass, the commonly grown grass in the region and accumulated high roots biomass in early establishment phase.Basilisk and MG4 and may be considered as the best bet cultivars for the north western highlands region due to their superior biomass yields.Past efforts to introduce cultivated forages to farmers in coastal lowlands Kenya were reported in the forage adoption study by Mureithi et al. (1998) (Njunie et al., 1995;Mwatate et al., 1998). Forage technologies' adoption was high immediately after promotion, but some farmers abandoned them after a few years (Nicholson et al., 1999). For example, the number of farms with pure stands of Napier grass and the amount planted per cow declined by nearly 50% from 1988 to 1993. In a recent study by Njarui et al. (2016b), natural pastures was the most popular feed in coastal lowlands, with over 98% of farmers using them to feed livestock. Utilization of cultivated forages for the region was low; with Napier grass contributing on average 10% of the feeds in most months. The low contribution of improved forages to dairy cattle feeding was partly because farmers gave less priority in the allocation of resources to forage cultivation (Mureithi et al., 1998). For example, Napier grass was planted in the least fertile part of the farm land and after maize. Napier grass plots were not weeded in time and most farmers were not able to return slurry to the Napier grass as recommended. The low priority farmers gave to the cultivated forages implies that they were more interested in crops. Past records indicate that there was little or limited involvement of farmers as co-researchers during forage technology development.In a programme to improve livestock production in East Africa, Brachiaria grass genotypes selected and improved in Latin America were re-introduced to coastal lowlands Kenya. Brachiaria species adapt to diverse habitats ranging from shaded to open areas and desert to swampy areas (Miles et al., 1996). Consequently, the grasses have great potential in the intensification of livestock production systems as sown forages in coastal Kenya. The programme sought to involve the farmers as co-researchers from the initial stages of technology development through participatory evaluation so that their priorities and views can be considered in selecting suitable forages for integration in their farming system. Participatory variety selection helps the farmers to select desired characteristics, as scientists obtain feedback from potential end users early in the technology development process.The grass cultivars for farmer evaluation were established at KALRO-Mtwapa, located 3 o 36'S, 39 o 44'E, 15 m asl. The site is in the coconut-cassava agro-ecological zone (Jaetzold et al., 2006).There are two distinct rainfall patterns in the area, a long rain season from April to June and a short rain season from October to December. The farmers were facilitated to develop criteria to be used when selecting grasses for planting on their farms. A multistage stratified sampling technique was used for selection of the farmers. Diverse sites where smallholder farmers practiced mixed-farming were identified within Kilifi County and visited by researchers for information gathering. Sites visited were Kaloleni and Chonyi (CL3), Gotani and Msabaha (CL4) and Tsangatsini (CL5). In each site, groups of 20 to 30 farmers were involved in focused group discussions (FGD). During the FGD, farmers were requested to suggest the things they considered important when selecting grasses to establish in their farms. The suggested criteria were clearly recorded by the research scientist and pair-wise ranking carried out as suggested by the farmers.Smallholder farmers were invited to KALRO Mtwapa centre, twice for participatory evaluation and selection of Brachiaria cultivars: in April, 2014 at the vegetative grass-growth stage and at maturity in July, 2014. Farmers were drawn from coastal lowlands (CL) agro-ecological zones 3, CL4 and CL5 (Table 1). Between 112-115 farmers participated in the evaluation (Table 1). There was equal mean representation of men and women (1:1) in the grass evaluation exercise. At the field site, each farmer was provided with an evaluation score data sheet. The farmers were trained on how to use the Likert scale of 1 -5 in the evaluation of each grass cultivar and record the data for each grass in the data sheet. They were then guided through a specific route within the experimental field, where they made their observations on each plot (grass cultivar) and recorded the information in the score sheet.Data was entered in MS excel spreadsheet and analysed using the general linear model of Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 2010). The mean scores for each evaluation criteria were separated using least significant differences (LSD) at P<0.05. The results are presented using descriptive statistics, charts and tables.Farmers identified 16 criteria they consider when selecting suitable forages for their livestock. These criteria were ranked based on their importance and are summarized in Table 2. Forages that are less hairy (LH), high yielding (HY), easy to establish and spread due to availability of planting materials (PM), with drought tolerance characteristics (DT), highly palatable when fed fresh (green) or at maturity (P) and with high re-growth ability after cutting (RA) would be most preferred by farmers. Criteria that were difficult to quantify or qualify were ranked lowest. High nutritive value of the foliage (NV), self-regeneration ability of the plants (SR), milk quality (less watery milk probably due to high butter fat in milk) (QM), palatability of dry grass (standing hay) and easily harvested due to firm plant anchorage in the soil (GA) were thus lowly ranked.Results of the farmer evaluation are summarized in Table 3. Humidicola failed to establish and therefore it was not included in the evaluation. All the Brachiaria grasses scored better (score >2.4) than Rhodes grass cv. ex-Tozi (score 2.1). Mulato II (score =3.3), Xaraes (score=3.2) had a higher score than Napier grass (score =3.0) while Marandu had similar score to Napier grass.Results show that both male and female farmers did not differ in their ranking of most the grasses (Table 4). The only exception was Xaraes which was ranked higher than Napier grass by men.The farmers in coastal Kenya sought after grasses that would be less hairy, produce large material for planting and productive even under low rainfall conditions. In cut-and-carry feeding systems, farmers preferred grass that does not irritate the skin when cutting and carrying to the feeding pens. Generally less hairy grasses are also more palatable. Farmers were conscious of the need to have plenty of planting materials for ease of establishment of forage crops. Consequently, grasses with many tillers would imply increase availability of planting materials as root splits or cuttings (Ramadhan et al., 2015). In a past survey, farmers identified lack of planting materials as a major constraint to fodder acreage expansion in the region (Ramadhan et al., 2008). Farmers' placement of \"drought tolerance' as among the most important criteria may be attributed to poor survival rates of previous cultivated grasses, especially Napier grass during prolonged drought periods. A survey in the region by Ramadhan et al. (2008) reported drought as the main factor affecting survival of Napier grass in coastal lowlands. Growth vigour, quick re-growth after cutting and yield criteria can be associated with increased fodder production per unit area. Inadequate feed was identified as a constraint to livestock production in the region (Reynolds et al., 1993;Njarui et al., 2016b). High palatability, soft and large leaves for ease of forage ingestion are desirable for increased feed intake. Milk yield and /or weight gain are closely related to feed intake (Orodho, 2006). Though not highly ranked, shade tolerance of the grass is important for coastal lowlands farming systems. The cropping system in coastal Kenya is dominated by tree crops, mainly fruit trees, coconut and cashew nuts (Jaetzold et al., 2006). Pasture development in this region is integrated with tree crops (Orodho, 1997). Farmers who participated in the discussions clearly identify areas under tree crops as a likely niche for planting grasses.The good performance of three Brachiaria grasses is of significance, considering that Napier grass is the recommended fodder grass for dairy production in the region (Mureithi et al., 1998;Nicholson et al., 1999). The better performing Brachiaria grasses could replace Napier grass in smallholder dairying systems. Furthermore, production of Napier grass especially in the highlands is threatened by Napier grass stunt disease which causes total loss of the crop in severe cases (Khan et al., 2014). Farmers have complained of poor survival of Napier grass onfarm resulting in low adoption of cultivated fodder in the region (Mureithi et al., 1998;Njarui et al., 2016a). The Brachiaria grasses offer alternative cultivated fodder to Napier grass and ex-Tozi in the region. Farmers indicated that they would prefer grasses that are easy to establish, productive, can tolerate drought, palatable and with high nutritive value. The Brachiaria cultivars that established well were all superior to Rhodes grass cv. ex-Tozi. Brachiaria hybrid cv. Mulato II and cvs. Xaraes were ranked higher than Napier grass.There is need for further evaluation of the best ranked Brachiaria cultivars to determine their nutritive value for milk and meat production on station and under farmer participation on farm. There is limited adoption of improved forages among smallholder farmers in Kenya. One of the major factors limiting adoption is insufficient attention to farmers' priorities and perceptions while developing and promoting agricultural technologies (Ashby and Sperling 1995;Chambers et al., 1989). For example, forage research and development in many countries including Kenya in the past often involved a process where researchers evaluated forages and selected those which had higher yield potential without farmer participation. The selected forages were then given to extension agents to be passed on to farmers (Gabunada et al., 1997). Unfortunately, technologies selected through this approach often failed to fulfill their potential from research evaluations and this resulted in low adoption. Since 1990s, participatory approaches have become a driving force for agricultural research and rural development.One of the recently adopted approaches is the Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS) that has been found to be very effective in addressing the problem of inadequate adoption of new varieties in many crops in different countries of the world (Islam et al, 2008). The approach involves the selection by farmers on their own fields of finished or near-finished products from plant breeding programmes (Paris et al., 2011). Successful application of PVS in Sub-Saharan Africa include bean crop improvement in Rwanda, Tanzania, and Malawi, the adaptation of the New Rice For Africa (NERICA) varieties (Walker, 2006), the development of maize varieties for drought tolerance, low nitrogen and pest tolerance (Hugo and Siambi, 2002) and identification of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars with farmer preferred traits in northern Tanzania (Sikumba et al., 2015). The first step in participatory varietal selection (PVS) is identifying the needs of farmers by discovering what crops they grow, and what traits they consider important when selecting varieties they grow within their agro-ecological and sociocultural environment (Witcombe, 1996;Paris et al., 2011). Further, participatory varietal selection is a means for social scientists to identify the varieties that most men and women farmers prefer, including the reasons for their preference and constraints to adoption.Analysis of participatory of CIMMITY research projects by Lilja and Bellon (2006) reported that some outcomes associated with participatory research include farmers' access to seed and faster adoption, awareness of new varieties and, provision of varieties with valued traits to farmers. Participatory evaluation and selection has been recommended as a key for improving of forages in Kenya (Mwangi and Wambugu, 2003). The objective of the study was to identify the selection criteria used by farmers to select forages and select suitable Brachiaria grass cultivars for integration in production system within semiarid environment of eastern Kenya.The Brachiaria grass cultivars were established at Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO), Katumani during the short rains season of 2013. The site (37 ˚28'0''E, 1 ˚58'0''S) is located at 75 km south-east of Nairobi at an elevation of 1580 m asl. The mean annual rainfall is 717 mm, bimodal pattern and the dominant soils are chromic luvisols, which are low in organic C, highly deficient in N and P and to some extent Zinc (NAAIAP, 2014). The seven cultivars used in the evaluation were Brachiaria brizantha cvs. Marandu, Xaraes, Piatã, MG4, Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk, Brachiaria humidicola cv. Llanero and Brachiaria hybrid cv. Mulato II. These were compared with Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana), a locally cultivated grass.The criteria used by farmers in the selection of grass cultivars were identified through focus group discussions (FGDs) following the procedure described by Krueger (2002). Groups of dairy farmers were purposefully selected from Upper Midlands 3 (UM3) and Lower Midlands 4 (LM4) agro-ecological zones in Machakos and Makueni Counties respectively. The farmers were randomly selected from a list of farmers who had participated in the baseline survey conducted earlier to identify niches for establishing Brachiaria grasses in the study area (Njarui et al., 2016b). With guidance of researchers and extension workers, farmers listed criteria they consider important for selection of forages for livestock. A pairwise ranking matrix was used to determine the most important criteria which were then applied in the evaluation and selection.Between 84 -89 farmers (Table 1) participated in evaluation and selection of Brachiaria grasses at Katumani at three separate occasions; March 2014 (wet season), June 2014 (end of wet season) and Oct 2014 (peak of dry season). Attributes that could not be directly observed in the field such as high milk yield, nutritionally balanced, palatability of forages etc. were dropped. The final criteria included drought tolerance, disease tolerance, soil erosion control, pest resistance, height at harvest and uses (suitable for grazing and for cut-and-carry). Green colour of the leaves was also included as a selection criterion. For each criterion, farmers' opinions on individual grass cultivars were recorded in an evaluation form using a Likert scale of 1 to 4 where, 1 =poor, 2=fair, 3=good and 4=very good. For each evaluation, the scores from each farmer were entered in Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and a mean score for each criterion calculated for each grass cultivar by gender. The mean scores for each criterion were subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and where significant differences occurred, means were separated by the least significant difference (LSD) test using the statistical software Genstat 15 for windows (VSN Int., 2013). To determine the best grass cultivar the scores for each farmer on each criterion were averaged over the three evaluations and the mean scores subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).Farmers identified 14 criteria that are important when selecting forages for livestock production (Table 14). Forages that give high milk yield when fed to livestock were ranked first followed by nutritionally balanced forages and palatability. Forages that are nutritionally balanced and highly palatable influencing milk production in livestock hence they were highly ranked. Drought is prevalent in the semi-arid region and therefore drought tolerant is an important criterion and was ranked fourth. Besides attribute related to livestock, farmers also considered other benefits of forages such as erosion control. In the semi-arid crops and livestock are closely integrated in the farming system and forages are planted along the terrace banks for control of erosion and also provide feed for livestock. Surprising high yield was ranked last because farmers prefer forages that have stable yield even during the dry season.The order of ranking of the grass cultivars was similar and not significantly different between farmers from UM3 and LM4 in the three evaluations and therefore analysis of the combined results are presented. The average scores for the three evaluations are shown Table 3. There were significant differences (P<0.05) among the grass cultivars on all the 9 selection criteria. The cv. MG4 had the highest score in 8 out of the 9 selection criteria and consequently had the highest mean score (3.08). The cvs. Basilisk, Mulato II and Xaraes were ranked second, third and fourth best cultivars respectively. Drought resistance and colour had the highest mean score (>3.0) (Table 3), implying that they were important for consideration when selecting forages.Deep green colour is associated with high nutritional quality, with Mulato II, MG4 and Basilisk being highly ranked for this attributes. Results from chemical analysis showed these grasses had high crude protein, 9.-13% at 6 week growth and 8 -11% at 8 weeks growth (Njarui et al., 2016a). The ranking of the Brachiaria cultivars largely concurred with results from agronomic evaluation reported by Njarui et al. (2016a) where cvs. MG4, Xaraes, Piatã and Basilisk recorded highest dry matter. On-farm study on adaptability of improved Brachiaria grasses in low rainfall and Aluminum toxicity prone areas of Rwanda (Mutimura and Everson, 2012) showed that although cv. Mulato II was not the most productive grass; farmers preferred it due to its adaptability to low rainfall and acidic soil stress, and its production of green forage year round. Similar results were reported from trials in D.R. Congo (Katunga et al., 2014) where forage trees and shrub legumes chosen by farmers were, in general, the same as those from the agronomic evaluation which emphasis the importance of involving farmers during the evaluation. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between female and male scores for the grass cultivars (Figure 1). However, scores for female farmers were generally higher than those for male farmers.Based on the criteria developed, the cultivars selected by farmers were found to be more productive and nutritious through the agronomic evaluation. Among the Brachiaria cultivars evaluated the cvs. MG4, Basilisk, Mulato II and Xaraes were ranked highly and could further be evaluated and up-scaled in other regions with similar environment. Participatory evaluation incorporates farmers view and preferred plant attributes and is likely to enhance adoption. Feed is a major component of the livestock production systems in Kenya accounting for 60-80% of the total production cost in the intensive systems. One of the major source of feed for livestock in central highland of Kenya is natural pasture, which is low in quantity and quality and consequently livestock productivity is low (Njarui et al., 2016). Napier and Rhodes grass are the major cultivated forage grasses in Kenya due to their relatively wide ecological adaptability, relatively high herbage yield and ease of propagation and management. In the intensive market oriented smallholder livestock production systems, Napier grass constitutes between 40 -80% of forages used by smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya. Although there have been efforts to evaluate new cultivars of Napier grass (Nyambati et al., 2010) there has been limited research on other grasses to increase the genetic base of fodders for production in mixed crop-livestock smallholder farms. In addition, the emerging lethal diseases such as Napier smut (Farrel et al., 2001) and Napier stunt (Jones et al., 2004) threaten the production of Napier grass for livestock feeding.Brachiaria grass, an indigenous grass in eastern, central and southern Africa (Ndikumana and de Leeuw, 1996) has been widely adapted as livestock forage in South America and East Asia. Besides its use as livestock feed, Brachiaria is known to contribute significantly to carbon sequestration, ecological restoration and soil erosion control hence it plays an important role in reducing greenhouse gases and nutrient losses from soils. Although Brachiaria grasses, have revolutionized the livestock industry as the most adaptable and high yielding grass in south and central America (Miles et al., 2004), their potential in its native land Africa remains largely unexploited. Limited research has been conducted to evaluate the agronomic performance of improved Brachiaria grasses under different agro ecological conditions in Kenya. Furthermore, farmers' participatory approaches in forage technology development have been ignored and this has contributed to low adoption of technologies by the farmers (Nicholson et al., 1999). In a programme to improve livestock production in East Africa, improved Brachiaria grass genotypes selected in Latin America were introduced to the cool highlands of central Kenya. However, these cultivars are new and unknown to the farmers and their performance and response to biophysical conditions in the Central highlands of Kenya are not known. It was therefore imperative to incorporate farmers' views and priorities in the initial development and introduction of Brachiaria cultivars before up scaling the cultivars in the farming systems. The objective of the study was to evaluate and select promising Brachiaria grasses in the cool highlands of Central Kenya using a farmer participatory approach.The study was conducted at KALRO Ol Joro Orok from November 2013 to May 2014. The site is located at 0˚03'S, 36˚06'E, and lies 2393 m asl in Upper highlands 2-3 (UH2-3) in Nyandarua County (Jaetzold et al., 2006). Average annual rain-fall is 950 mm with weak bimodal distribution and temperature ranging between 8 and 22°C. The dominant soils at the site are classified as Verto-luvic and Chromo-luvic Phaeozems (Sombroek et al., 1982).Eight Brachiaria grasses: Brachiaria brizantha cvs. Marandu, Xaraes, Piatã, MG4, Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk, B. humidicola, cvs. Humidicola and Llanero and B. hybrid Mulato II were evaluated. Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) cv. KARI-Kakamega 1 and Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana cv. Boma) were included in the evaluation as control. The plots were established in November 2013 and triple super-phosphate (TSP, 46% P2O5) fertilizer was applied at a rate of 200 kg ha¹ in the rows prior to sowing the seeds. The plots were kept weed free by hand weeding. The grasses were allowed to establish for 20 weeks before farmers were facilitated to perform a participatory evaluation and selection of the most promising cultivars.Twenty dairy farmers from three sub counties of Mirangine (UH2 and UH3), Nyandarua central (UH 3 and LH 1) and Nyandarua west (UH 2 and UH 3) participated in a one day workshop in April 2014 and developed farmer based criteria for evaluating the Brachiaria grasses. The farmers listed 12 criteria for rating the grasses. The criteria included the following Forage biomass (FB), Hairiness (H), Ground cover(GC), Plant height (PH), Soil and user friendly (SUF), Easy to store (ES), smell (S), Colour (C), Pest and disease resistant (PDR), withstand water logging (WL), Frost tolerant (FT) and Drought tolerant (DT). The twelve (12) criteria developed by farmers were further ranked and reduced to five (5) in order of importance using pairwise ranking. The five most important criteria were Forage biomass, Plant height, Ground cover, Hairiness and Pest and disease resistance.Participatory evaluation and selection of Brachiaria grass 60 (39 male and 21 female) farmers drawn from the sub counties of Mirangine -19 (10 male and 9 female), Nyandarua central -21 (14 male and 7 Female) and Nyandarua west-20 (15 male and 5 female) representing UH2, UH3, and LH 1 participated in a workshop in April, 2014 to evaluate the Brachiaria grasses. Farmers were trained on how to evaluate and fill the scores on the evaluation data sheet prior to the evaluation exercise. After the training, each farmer individually evaluated and rated the grass cultivars using a Likert scale of 1 to 5 (1=very poor to 5= very good) to rate each grass cultivar. Farmers individually recorded their ratings on each grass cultivar in the evaluation sheet.The data were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS (SAS Institute Inc. 2001) with grass cultivar as fixed effects. Means were separated using Fisher's protected least significant difference (LSD) at P<0.05. The means from farmer ranking were subjected to Pearson's linear correlation procedure to see the correlation significance. The results are presented using descriptive statistics.The results of farmers' most preferred criteria are summarized in table 1. Farmers evaluated the grasses using the following five (5) criteria forage biomass, hairiness, plant height at harvest, ground cover and resistance to pests and disease (Table 1). The forages which produced the most biomass and were less hairy were most preferred. Likewise, the tall forages with good ground cover were preferred also preferred by the farmers. Last but not least, farmers preferred grasses which would resist diseases and pests. The farmers' considerations implied that plant height and ground cover are among the important factors in determining forage yield. The results agreed with the findings of Tessema et al. (2003) who reported that increasing foliage height had a direct relationship with increased foliage biomass yield.The results of farmers' evaluation are summarized in Table 2. MG4 and Piata were the most preferred Brachiaria grasses. Brachiaria brizantha cv. MG4 was higher in forage biomass (P<0.05) compared to the other Brachiaria grasses. The most preferred Brachiaria grasses by the farmers were Piatã, MG4, Basilisk and Xaraes. However, the ranking of Brachiaria grasses were lower compared to both Napier and Rhodes grass controls. Basilisk was slightly lower than MG4 but was significantly higher than the other Brachiaria grasses. In a related study, Cook et al. (2005) reported decumbent growth habit in Basilisk which makes it to form a dense plant spread and cover which may have led to its high rating by the farmers. Specifically, according to the farmers evaluation, MG4 had a significantly higher (P<0.05) rating for ground cover compared to Basilisk but both were rated lower than Napier and Rhodes grass controls. Piatã and Basilisk had a similar rating. Llanero, Humidicola and Brachiaria hybrid Mulato II had the lowest rating (Table 2). MG4, Piatã and Xaraes and Basilisk were rated as having less hair compared with the other Brachiaria grasses but was rated (>0.05) lower than Rhodes grass control. Mulato II had the least rating in terms of hairiness followed by Napier grass control (Table 1). MG4 had the best rating for plant height and was significantly (P<0.05) taller than the other Brachiaria grasses. It was followed by Basilisk and Piatã in plant height. The two control grasses of Napier and Rhodes grass were similar in rating but were significantly rated higher (P<0.05) than Brachiaria grasses (Table 2). There was no significant difference between the Brachiaria grasses rating for pest and disease resistance. This could mean that farmers were not able to identify physical pests on the grasses. Llanero and Humidicola had the lowest rating in terms of forage biomass Napier control had the best rating followed by Rhodes grass (Table 2). There was a significant positive correlation between height (0.723, P<0.0001) and forage yield, suggesting that farmers rank estimate using height had a direct linear relationship to forage yield. Similar relationship was also observed between cover and forage yield (Table 4).The correlations between forage biomass and plant height and cover are in agreement with those reported by Munyasi et al. (2015), implying that height and cover could be used to assess biomass yield. Study by Skerman and Riveros (1990) also confirmed that pasture species which grow fast and tall are more efficient in resource use of and therefore more competitive and productive. In this study, the farmers indicated their preference for grasses that were tall, with high forage yield, resistance to pest and diseases, less hair and good ground cover. They selected MG4, Xaraes and Piata, and Basilisk as the most promising. However, they still preferred both Napier and Rhodes grass over the Brachiaria cultivars.Rhodes grass was however ranked highly and therefore the most preferred grass.The farmers indicated their preference for grasses that were tall, with high forage yield, resistance to pest and diseases, less hair and good ground cover. They selected Brachiaria brizantha cvs MG4, Xaraes and Piata, and Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk as the most promising. However, they still preferred both Napier and Rhodes grass over the Brachiaria cultivars. Rhodes grass was however ranked highly and therefore the most preferred grass. Sustainable intensification of livestock production driven by the adoption of improved fodder production technologies has potential to not only mitigate the effects of climate change but also enhance the resilience and livelihoods of smallholder farmers in Africa (FAO, 2010;Rioux et al., 2016). Recent studies show that improved Brachiaria grasses offer opportunities to address the challenge of feed scarcity, improve livestock production and livelihoods in African farming systems (Maass et al., 2015;Mutimura and Everson, 2012;Pizarro et al., 2013). For instance Ghimire et al. (2015) found considerable improvement in on-farm feed availability, body weight gain of cattle and milk yield increases owing to the recent re-introduction of Brachiaria grasses in Rwanda and Kenya. There is need therefore to promote suitable Brachiaria grasses for integration into smallholder farming systems to enhance uptake for livestock production in the East African region.Successful integration of the new Brachiaria cultivars to generate greater benefits for smallholder farmers would require precise fitting of the correct cultivars into different farming systems of Kenya (Maass et al., 2015). Farmer-centered research and development is recognised as an effective approach that enhances ownership, decision-making, uptake and scaling-out of improved technologies (KAPP and IIRR, 2015;Wanyama et al., 2003). Matching the promising cultivars to suitable socio-ecological contexts should carefully consider farmers' expectations driven by their needs and preferences as they are likely to influence adoption behaviour (Misiko et al., 2008;Wanyama et al., 2003). Yet it remains unclear what key attributes farmers expect the best Brachiaria grass to possess and which criteria they are likely to consider in selecting the most suitable cultivar for integration in the farming systems of North western highlands of Kenya.Participatory variety selection (PVS) is recognized as an effective and efficient participatory approach involving farmers as co-researchers to incorporate their input in selecting socially acceptable technologies that match well with their needs and environment (Horne and Stür, 1999;Nkongolo et al., 2008;Singh et al., 2014). It is an approach that facilitates the potential endusers to provide information on performance and acceptability of varieties, which then provides feedback to researchers to consider in their final recommendation of promising cultivars (Witcombe et al., 1996). This is essential because being conversant with farmers' preferences can enhance adoption prospects for a variety (Paris et al., 2011). The interactive learning process makes farmers more appreciative of the technology, enhances trust and builds ownership within the farming community thereby accelerating its wider dissemination and scaling-out.Despite its proven importance in successful varietal selection and wider uptake, PVS has mostly been applied in cereals and legumes such as maize, rice, wheat, sorghums, barley and beans (e.g. Ceccarelli et al., 2007;Misiko et al., 2008;Mitchell et al., 2014;Nkongolo et al., 2008;Nyende and Delve, 2004;Pandit et al., 2007;Paris et al., 2011) and hardly in forages like Brachiaria grasses (e.g. Mutimura and Everson, 2012;Phengsavanh et al., 2004). In Kenya, farmers have rarely been involved as co-researchers in selecting promising Brachiaria grass cultivars aligned with their needs and suitable for their farming environments. The current study therefore is an effort to fill this knowledge gap so as to accelerate the uptake and impact of promising Brachiaria grasses on livestock productivity and agrarian livelihoods in the country.The objective of the study was to consider farmers' criteria in the selection of acceptable Brachiaria grass cultivars for integration into the farming system of North western highlands of Kenya. Specifically, we examine farmers' development of choice criteria with special emphasis on gender preferences. This study documents participatory harmonization and ranking of priority criteria and test them in the actual farmer selection of the best Brachiaria grass cultivars.A sampling frame of farmers who were earlier interviewed during a baseline survey on delineation of niches for integration of Brachiaria grasses into the farming systems of North western Kenya was relied upon (Mutoko et al., 2015). Following Alreck and Settle (1985) methodology, the main sample of 215 households was drawn using stratified random sampling technique, from Upper Highlands (UH) 3, Midland Upper Midlands (UM) 4 and Lower Highlands (LH) 3 agro-ecological zones located across counties of Trans Nzoia, Uasin Gishu and Elgeyo Marakwet. A proportionate sub-sample of 100 farmers was then randomly drawn for criteria development and participatory Brachiaria cultivars evaluation as shown in Table 1. About 69% were male and the rest female farmers. As suggested by Misiko (2013), we deliberately sampled the same farmers who participated in the baseline survey with a view to enhance consistency and eliminate the effect of 'impulsive buying' during Brachiaria cultivars selection. The selected farmers were invited to participate in criteria identification, prioritization and evaluation of Brachiaria cultivars at Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) Kitale. The site is located at longitude 1° 0′ 6.6´´N and latitude 34° 59´ 10´´E, at 1890 m above sea level. The site lies in UM4 agro-ecological zones with temperatures ranging between 10 °C and 27 °C and receives bimodal rainfall of 1000 -1200 mm per year. Soils are mainly humic Acrisols, which are deep and well-drained (Jaetzold et al., 2006). Participating farmers convened at KALRO Kitale in October 2014, where they were briefed on the need to develop the criteria they would use in evaluating and selecting the most suitable Brachiaria grass cultivars. To avoid gender bias and possible dominance in the process, participants were disaggregated by gender into three groups: men, women and youth. With the guidance of researchers and extension officers, each group listed and ranked 10 key criteria that they consider important while selecting suitable forages for their livestock. The identified criteria were presented in a plenary by the leader of each group.During the plenary, focused discussions were conducted to harmonize the identified criteria. These criteria were then ranked in order of priority using a pairwise ranking matrix. Each listed criterion was compared against the others in the set and farmers picked the preferred one for every pair. Entries of criteria were counted in the entire matrix and the criteria having highest score ranked first. Where criteria tied, farmers were requested to break the tie by comparing each pair and selecting the priority criterion between them.The current empirical study was conducted on a researcher-managed trial under controlled, uniform conditions. The study therefore minimized the effect of extraneous factors on farmer preferences and availed reliable information. Output from the participatory criteria development process informed the design of a simple evaluation tool with solely those criteria that farmers could observe and appraise in the experimental fields. Mean scores and standard errors were computed by county, agro-ecological zone and gender of the farmers. Chi-square (χ 2 ) test was applied to determine significant mean score differences between cultivars based on the key selection criteria. Mean scores were then used to determine the best farmer-acceptable Brachiaria grass cultivars. Data processing and analysis was done in SPSS version 20.Results from participatory criteria identification showed that farmers largely desired forages that increase milk production, are persistent and improves soil fertility (Table 2). Other attributes were palatability, high herbage yield and tolerance to drought, weeds, pests and diseases. Farmers' prioritized preferences indicate their expectation for forages that have multiple benefits to meet their needs and are tolerant to biotic and abiotic stresses as highlighted by Kidake et al. (2016). Identification of these preferences by farmers at the variety evaluation stage is essential for wider adoption of Brachiaria grasses. This is because consideration of farmer criteria would essentially ensure that recommended Brachiaria grass cultivars meet farmers' requirements and their opportunities, thus they have better prospects to adapt as earlier reported by Nkongolo et al. (2008) on sorghums in Malawi, Misiko et al. (2008) on soya beans in Kenya and Phengsavanh et al. (2004) on improved forages in Lao PDR.Results in Table 3 show differences in mean score among the seven Brachiaria cultivars and two local fodder checks based on key selection criteria. Basilisk, MG4 and Piata had significantly higher (p≤0.05) mean scores than Napier and Rhodes grass on pest and disease tolerance, forage amount and hairiness. There was however no significant; differences on maturity between the three most preferred Brachiaria grasses, cvs. MG4, Basilisk and Piata and Napier grass. Napier grass had highest score (3.5) on height while Llanero has the lowest. This difference is attributed to growth habit. Llanero has a prostrate growth habit and spread by stolon while Napier is erect in it growth habit. Rhodes grass had significantly lower (p≤0.05) mean score than MG4, Basilisk and Piata across all the selection criteria except hairiness, which was comparable with MG4 (Table 3). The mean scores for Rhodes grass were only significantly higher (p≤0.05) than Mulato II and Llanero across all criteria. The mean scores for Marandu and Xaraes did not differ significantly (p>0.05) from Rhodes grass in most of the selection criteria except forage amount and tolerance to pests and disease (Table 3). This suggests that farmers would be indifferent between cultivating either Marandu, Xaraes or Rhodes grass for livestock feeding.Results presented in Table 4 show the mean scores disaggregated by county for each Brachiaria cultivar and the local fodder checks. Farmers from Trans Nzoia and Uasin Gishu counties reported comparable preferences although the former recorded relatively high mean scores. This is because the two counties have similar predominant agro-ecological zones, UM4 and LH3 (Jaetzold et al., 2009), thereby farmers from these counties face comparable biophysical conditions for adoption and adaptation of the preferred Brachiaria grasses (Paris et al., 2011) Conversely, Basilisk and Piata were highly rated by farmers from Elgeyo Marakwet County, with cvs. MG4, Xaraes and Marandu tying up at third position. This significant difference (p<0.05) in the selection of cultivars could be attributed to the distinctive agro-ecological zone UH3, which prevails mainly in Elgeyo Marakwet County (Jaetzold et al., 2009). The result clearly indicates that farmers consider multiple criteria when selecting suitable forages for their livestock. This finding is consistent with Mutimura and Everson (2012) who found differences in farmer preferences for Brachiaria grasses between Nyamagabe and Bugesera districts in Rwanda. As recognized by Pandit et al. (2007) on PVS and scaling-out of wheat, farmers' context-specific needs coupled with adaptation potential of varieties to local biophysical conditions influence their choices of promising crop varieties.There was however no significant difference (p>0.05) across the counties for the least preferred Brachiaria grass cvs. Llanero and Mulato II, indicating that these cultivars do not meet farmers' expectations on performance in terms production attributes. These Brachiaria cultivars are therefore the least adaptable thus are unlikely to be adopted in the North western highlands of Kenya. This result contradicts Mutimura and Everson (2012) who found that cv. Mulato II was the most preferred Brachiaria cultivar by farmers from Nyamagabe and Bugesera districts in Rwanda, thereby signifying the importance of agro-ecological adaptation and context-specific farmer needs in the selection of acceptable Brachiaria grasses. Comparison with the local checks revealed that cv. MG4 had significantly higher (p≤0.05) mean score than Napier grass cv. KK1, whereas cvs. Basilisk and Piata were not significantly different from Napier grass cv. KK1 (Table 4). The overall mean score of 2.3 for Rhodes grass was significantly lower (p≤0.05) than the best four Brachiaria cultivars. Agro-ecological zonation had significant influence on farmer selection of Brachiaria cv. MG4 alone (Table 5). Which was rated cv. MG4 significantly lower (p≤0.05) by farmers in UH3 than their counterparts from UM4 and LH3. Although farmers from UH3 recorded lower scores for all Brachiaria cultivars except cvs.Mulato II and Llanero, the average scores did not significantly differ across the major AEZs in North western highlands of Kenya. This finding indicates good prospects for integration of the farmer-preferred Brachiaria grasses into the existing fodder production systems of North western highlands of Kenya. Disaggregation of data by gender showed similar preference trend between male and female farmers (Table 6). This result supports a recent study in Kenya, which did not establish significant gender disparity on farmers' preference of promising integrated soil and water management technologies in Northwestern Kenya (Esilaba et al., 2015). Across all Brachiaria cultivars however, female farmers recorded relatively higher scores than their male counterparts although it was not significant.Irrespective of gender of the farmers, MG4, Basilisk, Piata and Xaraes were the most preferred. This finding clearly points to universal farmer-preference of these cultivars and implies that they have good prospects for uptake when availed to both genders of livestock farmers in the study area. Comparison with Napier and Rhodes grasses showed a similar trend as reported for inter-county results and revealed no gender disparity. The study revealed that farmers in north western highlands of Kenya preferred MG4, Basilisk, Piata, Xaraes and Marandu. When the identified farmers' perceptions guide the promotion of these farmer-acceptable Brachiaria cultivars, wide adoption will enhance their resilience to the effects of climate change, improve livestock productivity and household food security as established by Rioux et al. (2016). Studies on accelerating uptake of improved rice varieties in Lao PDR (Mitchell et al., 2014), sorghum in Malawi (Nkongolo et al., 2008), wheat in Bangladesh (Pandit et al., 2007) and legume cover crops in Uganda (Nyende and Delve, 2004) provides scientific evidence that incorporating farmers' preference information to complement scientists' data ensures only the best cultivars possessing attributes preferred by most farmers are progressed for on-farm adoption and scaling-out. This is because active farmer participation in the selection of farmer-acceptable Brachiaria cultivars will enhance their adoption and adaptation within the local farming contexts, as found by Wanyama et al. (2003). Our findings therefore are relevant for targeted promotion of four better performing and most suitable Brachiaria cultivars for successful uptake in the farming system of North western highlands of Kenya.Results from this study have potential to boost farmers' ownership and decision-making on suitable Brachiaria cultivars to ultimately catalyse their diffusion to bring more benefits to many farming households in North western highlands of Kenya (e.g. IIRR, 2000; Paris et al., 2011)Recognizing farmers' expectations and being responsive to their preferences for a new technology or improved intervention is central to its successful promotion and acceptance in the farming community. Using farmers own identified criteria on forage amount, height at harvest, maturity period, hairiness and tolerance to pests and diseases, MG4, Basilisk, Piata, Xaraes and Marandu were the most preferred cultivars in western Kenya. Based on the findings from this study, we recommend for targeted promotion of these most farmer-preferred Brachiaria cultivars for successful uptake in the region.The genus Brachiaria from the tribe Panicaeae consists of about 100 documented species distributed across tropical and sub-tropical regions of both eastern and western hemisphere (Renvoize et al., 1996). Most Brachiaria species are of African origin, and Africa is the center of diversity for the genus Brachiaria (Parsons, 1972). Seven perennial Brachiaria species of African origin (B. arrecta, B. brizantha, B. decumbens, B. dictyoneura, B. humidicola, B. mutica and B. ruziziensis) are grown as forage, particularly in humid tropical regions of South America, Asia, South pacific and Australia (Argel and Keller-Grein, 1996;Pizarro et al., 1996;Stur et al., 1996). The Brachiaria are most probably widely grown forage grass species in the tropics with estimated acreage of 99 million hectares in Brazil (Jank et al., 2014). The widespread adoption of Brachiaria is attributed to several desirable agronomic traits such as tolerance to drought, shade and flooding; adaptation to low fertility and acid soils; high biomass production potentials; ability to sequester carbon into soils; increase nitrogen use efficiency and minimize greenhouse gas emission (Fisher et al., 1994;Fisher and Kerridge, 1996;Rao et al., 1996;Subbarao et al., 2009).Brachiaria are highly palatable and nutritious forages thus increase livestock productivity. Moreover, Brachiaria plays important roles in ecological restoration and soil erosion control.Most, if not all, plants in natural ecosystems are symbiotic with mycorrhizal fungi and/or fungal endophytes (Petrini, 1986). Fungal symbionts can have influence on ecology, fitness and evolution of host plants (Brundrett, 2006), shaping plant communities (Clay and Holah, 1999) and influencing community structure and diversity of microbial community (Omacini et al., 2001). Enhance water and nutrients uptake, greater stress tolerance, protection from pests and diseases, increased yields are among benefits from endophytes to plants (Clay and Schardl, 2002). Therefore, fungal endophytes have important roles in the adaptation, healthy and overall performance of host plants (Clay et al., 1989;Schardl, 1996;Cheplick et al., 2000;Clay and Schardl, 2002;Ghimire and Craven, 2011). However, some fungal endophytes are detrimental to livestock e. g. Neotyphodium x coenophialum and N. lolii cause fescue toxicosis in cattle ( Schmidt et al., 1982) and ryegrass staggers in sheep (Fletcher and Harvey, 1981) , respectively. Therefore, the relative importance of these endophytes in agriculture and natural ecosystems depend partly on their abilities to produce different types of alkaloids.Despite being native to Africa, it is not widely cultivated in the region. Its importance has been recently realized to support the growing livestock industries in Africa, and many institutions are currently involved in Brachiaria research and development in the region. Brachiaria are known to harbor an endophytic fungus, Acremonium implicatum with anti-mycotic properties against Drechslera sp., a causal agent of leaf spot disease (Dongyi and Kelemu, 2004). Despite importance of microbes on host adaptation and overall performance, current understanding of endophytic microbes of Brachiaria is very limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to isolate fungal endophytes of Brachiaria grass from above and below ground tissues, and identify candidate fungi for re-introduction into Brachiaria cultivars for enhanced adaptation to drought and low fertility acid soils.Study Thirty whole plant samples of Brachiaria ecotypes consisting multiple tillers and 2 to 3 inflorescences were collected from ILRI Farm (1°16'S and 36°43'E), Nairobi whereas five plant samples of Mulato II were collected from KALRO-Katumani (1°35'S and 37°14'E) during July and August, 2013. The ILRI Farm is located at the altitude of 1795m ASL with annual rainfall of 900 mm, and mean minimum and maximum temperatures of 10°C and 24°C, respectively. The KALRO-Katumani is located at 1600 m asl with annual rainfall of 717 mm and annual mean minimum and maximum temperatures of 13.7°C and 24.7°C, respectively. Both sites have two seasons (wet and dry), and the differences between wet and dry seasons are minimal.The leaf, pseudo-stem and root samples were rinsed thoroughly in tap water to remove soil. Samples were cut into 3-4 cm pieces and surface disinfected in 70% ethanol for 60 sec followed by further disinfection in Tween-80 amended 1.2% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min for leaves and 20 min for stems and roots. Surface disinfected tissues were rinsed three times in sterile water, blot dried, cut into small pieces (1-1.5 cm) and plated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) plates amended with antibiotics cocktail (Ghimire et al., 2011) Seed samples were processed as following the procedure of (Charlton et al., 2014). Plates were incubated in the dark at 24°C for up to two months and examined periodically for emerging fungal colonies. Emerging fungi were harvested regularly and purified through minimum of three rounds of subcultures and fungal cultures from repeated subcultures were used for DNA extraction and long-term storage.Fungal material for DNA extraction was harvested from 1 to 2 weeks old culture grown on PDA by scrapping edge of fungi colony (5-7 mm 2 ). The fungal material was suspended to 100 µl of PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in the microcentrifuge tube, vortexed for 30 sec. and incubated into boiling water for 10 min. Subsequently, the tube was allowed to cool at room temperature for 2 min, centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 min. and 50 µl supernatant was transferred to a new tube. The supernatant was diluted ten times for subsequent PCR reactions or stored at 4°C and -20°C as necessary.The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions of fungal ribosomal DNA (rDNA) are highly variable thus are extremely useful in distinguishing fungal species by PCR analysis (Martin and Rygiewicz, 2005). Fungal specific primer pairs ITS1F and ITS4 that amplify 18S rRNA gene (partial), ITS1, 5.8S rRNA gene, ITS2 and partial 28S rRNA gene (partial) were used in this study, and sequences generated using these universal primers are highly represented in the NCBI nucleotide databases. The PCR primers were used to sequence the purified PCR products as described previously (Puckette et al., 2009). Nucleotide sequences were trimmed, assembled and aligned using CLC Main Workbench 6.8.4 (http://www.clcbio.com). Manual editing was done on the sequences to ensure accuracy in the assembly. Sequences were then blasted on the NCBI server against the non-redundant database to assign taxonomy. Phylogenetic analysis of the sequences was performed using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura 3parameter model in MEGA version 6 (Tamura et al., 2013). The sequences of representative fungal taxa including variants of the same species were submitted to the NCBI and are published with accession numbers KU574663 to KU574721 and KU680347 to KU680417.The observed isolation frequencies for fungal taxa isolated from above ground (foliage and seeds) and below ground (roots) tissues of Brachiaria grasses were documented. The relatedness of each taxon to at different taxonomic levels (species, genus, family, class and phylum) was established and associated frequencies were calculated. The fungal diversity analysis was done using an online biodiversity calculator and EstimateS version 9.1.0 software (Colwell, 2013).The results presented in this study are based on the 18S rRNA gene (partial), ITS1, 5.8S rRNA gene, ITS2 and partial 28S rRNA gene (partial) sequences of 354 fungal isolates originated from surface sterilized asymptomatic above ground foliar and seeds tissues and below ground root tissues of Brachiaria grass. The 94 above ground (shoots and seeds) and 260 below ground isolates from roots belong to 45 and 44 taxa, respectively from phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota with Ascomycota constituting 98.8% of the whole fungal community. Grouping of the 94 aerial fungal isolates into different taxonomic levels revealed them into two phyla, six classes, 13 orders, 18 families, 31 genera and 45 distinct taxa. The 260 isolates from roots belonged to two phyla, five classes, 10 orders, 12 families, 20 genera and 44 distinct taxa. There were also 12 isolates with unknown identity (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Cladosporium, Microspaeropsis, Acremonium, Fusarium and Alternaria were the most frequently detected genera in the above ground community whereas Fusarium, Gibberella, Gaeumannomyces and Magnaporthe were the most frequently detected genera in the below ground community. To our knowledge this is the first study that documents the fungal community diversity in the symptomless aerial and below ground tissues of Brachiaria grass from Kenya and Sub-Saharan Africa.The phylogenetic relationships among the fungal isolates from above and below ground populations have been illustrated separately using 45 and 44 representative taxa, respectively. The phylogenetic tree for above ground taxa showed 9 major clusters (Figure 3). In addition, the relationships among diverse species identified including Acremonium isolates and the isolates of the genus Sarocladium, which was extended to include seven species that were formerly placed in Acremonium (Summerbell et al., 2011) has been shown in the above ground phylogenetic tree.The below ground phylogenetic tree (Figure 4) on the other hand, shows 6 clusters with a major clade of Fusarium isolates that sub-clusters into two groups comprising 59.2% of the below ground fungal community isolated.The Shannon Index value calculated (H'=5.17) for the above ground population and that of the below ground population, (H'= 4.06) showed that the Brachiaria fungal community is rich in the species diversity (Table 1a) supported by a high Equitability Index (EI) in the above ground community. A high EI value denotes an even species distribution that tends to 1 whereas unequal distribution tends to zero. Simpson's Index (SI) which focus on the most abundant species without considering the richness of that population showed the above ground population had higher species diversity denoted by a low index than in the below ground community since as the abundance index increases, the diversity is known to decrease implying they are inversely correlated (Magurran, 2004). Other indices like Menhinick Index (MI) and Margalef Richness Index (MR) which compensate for sampling effects by dividing the species recorded in each population by the number of individuals in that population (Magurran, 2004) further supported the results as indicated by low indices which depicted a much richer above ground community than in the below ground community. Comparison between the two communities from the similarity indices showed quite dissimilar species between them. In a similarity index, a value of 1 means the two populations compared share all their species whereas a value of 0 means they share none. In this case, both Jaccard (J) and Sorenson's Classic similarity (SC) indices as well as Bray-Curtis similarity (BC) index which calculate similarity based on presence/absence or abundance data while Morisita-Horn index (MH) which is not influenced by species richness and sample size (Wolda, 1981) revealed very low indices (Table 1b) thus showing quite dissimilar species existing between the two populations. The results revealed only five shared species among them. These included members from the genera, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Periconia and Gaeumannomyces.The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 unequal distribution between the two populations. The genus Cladosporium (13.8%) was the most frequently detected in the above ground population whereas the genus Fusarium (59.2%) dominated the below ground population.Most of the taxa detected in the above ground community included Cladosporium, Acremonium, Alternaria and Epicoccum which have also been found dominant as non-systemic endophytes in most temperate grasses and also at their senescence stages of the above ground plant parts existing as latent saprophytes (Sanchez Marquez et al., 2012) but are not host specific. For example, endophytic mycobiota isolation from a perennial grass, Dactylis glomerata from both aerial and below ground communities, revealed 91 different species from 3 phyla, Ascomycota, Basidiomycota and Zygomycota representing 63 genera with ascomycetes dominating represented by the genera Penicillium, Cladosporium, Acremonium, Phaeosphaeria, Fusarium, Epicoccum and some members of Epichloë (Sánchez Márquez, Bills, and Zabalgogeazcoa 2007). In addition, the fungal diversity of two coastal grasses, Ammophila arenaria and Elymus farctus from leaves and rhizomes identified 103 different species classified into 2 phyla, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota among which represented 62 genera with some of the most abundant being generalists such as Alternaria, Acremonium, Cladosporium and Epicoccum (Sánchez Márquez, Bills, and Zabalgogeazcoa 2008). In the below ground community of the Brachiaria grass, the most detected genera comprised Fusarium followed by few species of Gibberella, Gaeumannomyces and Magnaporthe and other 16 genera represented by singleton species. While comparing the Brachiaria fungal community with other tropical grasses like the switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), the most frequently detected genera from both aerial and root tissues were members of Fusarium, Alternaria, Gibberella and Periconia (Ghimire et al., 2011) which were also isolated in this study. In cereal crops such as rice (Oryza sativa L.), the most frequently detected genera of fungal isolates were members of Cladosporium, Fusarium and Penicillium (Naik, Shashikala, and Krishnamurthy, 2009). Members of Penicillium as well as Aspergillus, and Trichoderma species are among the filamentous fungi isolated from different rhizosphere soils which have been tested to be associated with solubilization of insoluble phosphorus important for promotion of growth in plants (Saber et al., 2009;Yasser et al., 2014).In addition, (Danielsen and Jensen 1999) isolated endophytic fungi from aerial parts of 4 Costa Rican C4 grasses and local maize variety to screen for antagonism against the mycotoxins producer, Fusarium verticillioides. They found the most dominant genera were Fusarium and Nigrospora whereas Cladosporium, Penicillium, Phoma and Trichoderma were infrequently detected but were able to reduce necrosis of P. verticillioides infection on maize to some extent hence proved as potential biocontrol agents.Members of the genera Acremonium, Lecanicillium, Fusarium and Nectria spp. were detected in the aerial tissues of these Brachiaria grasses whereas Gibberella, Metarhizium, Trichoderma and several Fusarium isolates were detected in the root tissues belonging to the Order Hypocreales often reported as beneficial endophytes in grasses (Dongyi and Kelemu 2004;Ghimire et al., 2011;Sanchez Marquez et al., 2012). It is interesting to note that we did not detect any members of the family Clavicipaceae in our isolation, which accommodate the Epichloë species that also belong to the order Hypocreales (Summerbell et al., 2011). These have been detected in some grasses (Sánchez Márquez, Bills, and Zabalgogeazcoa 2007) and have been associated with livestock toxicosis (Fletcher and Harvey 1981;Schmidt et al., 1982).Members of genera Acremonium and Sarocladium were among a group of endophytes isolated from Brachiaria grasses in the above ground population. Both genera share similar morphological features but phylogenetic analysis has revealed genetic differences between them (Summerbell et al., 2011;Giraldo et al., 2015). Moreover, Sarocladium accommodate seven species (A. strictum, A. kiliense, A. zeae, A. basillisporum, A. bactrocepharum, A. ochraccum and A. glaucum) that were formerly placed under Acremonium (Summerbell et al., 2011). Some Acremonium/Sarocladium establishes endophytic association with plant and provides fitness advantages to the host. For example, Acremonium implicatum is an endophyte of Brachiaria spp. That is transmitted through seeds and provides protection against fungal pathogen Drechslera spp. the causal agent of leaf spot disease (Kelemu and Takayama, 1998;Dongyi and Kelemu, 2004). Similarly, Acremonium zeae has been considered as a protective endophyte of maize and displays antifungal activity against kernel rotting and mycotoxin producing fungi Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides, and interferes with A. flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination of pre-harvest maize kernels (Wicklow et al., 2005). Our study demonstrated a substantial association of Acremonium spp. in the native Brachiaria populations. A. implicatum, a common endophyte of Brachiaria species in South America was not detected at all in Kenyan Brachiaria populations, and the only one A. implicatum isolated in this study was from the foliage tissue of second year crop of hybrid Mulato grown from the seeds imported from South America. Sarocladium spinificis that shows a close relationship to Acremonium species detected in this study was recently reported as endophyte of coastal grass Spinifex littoreus in Taiwan (Yeh and Kirschner, 2014). Endophytic fungi isolated from Brachiaria grasses were non-systemic, generalist grass endophytes as reported from several temperate and tropical grasses (Sanchez Marquez et al., 2012).Examples of beneficial endophytes isolated as single isolates were members of the genera Metarhizium, Lecanicillium Paecilomyces, Penicillium and Trichoderma that are useful in agricultural and industrial applications. Metarhizium anisopliae (M. flavoviride), Paecilomyces lilacinus, are wellknown entomopathogenic fungi that are environmentally friendly and used as biocontrol agents against insect pests and against other plant pathogens on the root rhizosphere of plants in integrated pest management strategies (Peveling and Demba, 1997;Kiewnick and Sikora, 2006;Anastasiadis et al., 2008). Trichoderma spp. have also been used as biological control agents together with other microbes in defense against plant disease causing pathogens using different mechanisms. For example, T. virens and T. harzianum work against pathogenic Pythium species and Rhizoctonia solani and also promote overall plant biomass growth and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses that affect general plant health (Howell, 2003). Penicillium spp. are ubiquitous fungi known, that are not only pathogenic but are also beneficial. They are not only mycotoxins producers, but also produce other secondary metabolites associated with antagonism against plant pathogens e. g. P. chrysogenum isolated from rice has been tested in dual cultures and shown to be antagonistic against other plant pathogens such as Rhizoctonia solani, Alternaria alternata, Phoma sorghina and Macrophomina phaseolina (Naik et al., 2009).In conclusion, Brachiaria fungal community was complex harbouring a wide range of fungi that potentially have varied relationships with the host. In an agricultural perspective, some are applicable as biological control agents, plant growth promoters, promote antagonism against plant pathogens as causal agents of diseases or enhancing plant resilience against drought and other stresses. Most endophytes detected in Brachiaria were generalist as observed in other C4 grasses with no Epichloë detected in this study. The rich diversity of endophytic fungi in the native Brachiaria grasses exhibited in this study is very important in improving their productivity and building resilience for sustainable forage availability in Kenya and Sub-Saharan Africa countries. Therefore, this being the very first study on fungal endophytes existing in these grasses in their native environment, this core collection of endophytes would be very important for identifying the most beneficial fungi for re-introduction into the grasses for their adaptation to abiotic and biotics stresses as we adopt them back to their native environments in Africa.Director of BecA-ILRI Hub for encouragement and support in this study. We are also thankful to Monday Ahonsi for input while planning of this study.Brachiaria grass is an important constituent of Savannah grassland ecosystem that supports millions of African herbivores for thousands of years (Kelemu et al., 2011). They consist of about 100 documented species and several of them are used as cultivated forage across the tropics. Brachiaria is the most extensively grown tropical forage in Latin America, Asia, South Pacific and Australia with an estimated acreage of 99 million hectares in Brazil alone (Jank et al., 2014).Recently, there has been considerable interest in Brachiaria grass in its native home of Africa, and several initiatives are on-going to promote Brachiaria as an additional forage option for sustaining the emerging livestock industry in the region; especially for dry season feeding (Maass et al., 2015). Brachiaria grasses has several desirable traits that include adaptation to marginal soils; water stresses and shade tolerance; high biomass production potential; ability to sequester carbon; increase nitrogen use efficiency through biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) and subsequently reducing greenhouse gas emissions and ground water pollution (Rao et al., 1996;Subbarao et al., 2009). The grass is highly palatable and nutritious forages thus increase livestock productivity. Moreover, Brachiaria is an important ecological agent with significant roles in soil reclamation and erosion control. Despite the plethora of desirable attributes and high annual biomass production potential of 30 t/ha, the on-farm productivity of Brachiaria in Africa is quite low.The global demand for livestock product is projected to increase by 70 percent in 2050 due to growing population; rising affluence and urbanization (www.fao.org/livestockenvironment/en). Forages are the main component of livestock feeds accounting for 60 to 80 percent of livestock production costs (Ademosun, 1976). The economic production of forages can be attained through minimizing the production costs and by closing the yield gaps. As for many cultivated crops there is substantial yield gap on forages since forage yields are highly responsive to expensive inputs such as water, fertilizers and other agro-chemicals (Lobell et al., 2013). There is need, therefore, for concerted multidisciplinary effort to increase the livestock productivity through the development of low input forage production systems that minimize the use of resources without compromising forage productivity.Endophytic and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are known to provide several fitness benefits to plant hosts. These benefits include nitrogen fixation (Bahulikar et al., 2014;James 2000), the production of auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins (García de Salamone et al., 2001;Gutierrez-Manero et al., 2001;Taghavi et al., 2009), suppression of the ethylene production by 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity (Taghavi et al., 2009;Zhang et al., 2011), alteration of sugar sensing mechanisms in plants (Taghavi et al., 2009), solubilization of mineral phosphorous to a form that is readily available to plants (Turan et al., 2012), and synthesis of siderophores (Rungin et al., 2012) and other low molecular mass compounds or enzymes that can modulate plant growth and development (Lamber and Joos 1989). Endophytic and PGPR also benefit host plants by preventing or suppressing plant pathogens by competing for niche and nutrients, by antibiosis, through the production of hydrolytic enzymes and through induced systemic resistance (Mendes et al., 2011). A model system involving plant bacterial association (poplar host and endophytic bacteria Enterobacter sp.) has been well recognized for variety of fitness enhancement on poplar and other plant species (Taghavi et al., 2010). Endophytic and PGPR seem to exist in most, if not all, higher plant species (Wu et al., 2012). The utilization of endophytes and PGPR bacteria is, therefore, a feasible strategy for enhancing the productivity of wide range of plant species but this is severely constrained due to limited understanding of these microbes in different hosts. The objective of the study was to enumerate cultivable bacterial endophytes and PGPR of important tropical forage Brachiaria spp. and to characterize them for functional roles in plants for potential applications in the commercial cultivation of Brachiaria grasses in sub Saharan Africa.Endophytic and plant-associated bacteria were isolated from leaves, roots and rhizoplane soils collected from thirty apparently healthy looking Brachiaria plants grown in wild at the farm of the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) in Nairobi, Kenya. These plants are maintained in experimental plot at ILRI Campus after collecting samples for bacterial isolations.Bacterial strains were grown in 1/10 th strength 869 broth supplemented with 0.5 g per litre of Ltryptophan at 28 °C for 5 days at 150 rpm in dark. After growth the number of bacterial cells was estimated using a spectrophotometer at 600 nm. To detect and quantify IAA production, 1 volume of clarified culture supernatant added with two volumes of Salkowski reagent (Mayer, 1958) and incubated for 35 min at room temperature. Development of a pink color (indication of IAA production) was quantified by measuring absorbance at 535 nm.Bacterial siderophoregenesis was determined using Chrome-Azurol (CAS) media as described previously (Vellore, 2001). Briefly, bacterial strains were grown overnight at 28 °C on a shaker in two variants of Modified Fiss Minimal Media (5.03 g/L KH2PO4, 5.03 g/L L-asparagine, 5.0 g/L glucose, 40 mg/L MgSO4, 100 μg/L MnSO4, and 500 μg/L ZnCl2). Iron-restricted modified Fiss Minimal Medium and high iron Modified Fiss Minimal Medium were prepared by adding 139 μg/L FeSO4 (5 μM) and 5.56 mg/L FeSO4 (20 μM) to the final media respectively. Siderophore production was examined by loading 60 μl of clarified culture supernatant into wells made with a cork borer in the CAS media. Plates were incubated at 28 °C for 3-5 days. The development of yellow or orange halos around the inoculated wells is indicative of siderophore production.Bacterial ability to solubilize phosphate was determined by spotting 10 µl of fresh bacterial cells onto NBRIP media (Mehta and Nautiyal, 2001). Inoculated plates were incubated at 28°C for 2-3 days. Formation of clear halos around the colony is indicative of phosphate solubilization. The size of halo produced by each test strain was used as a measure of the strength of the phosphate solubilizing ability of each strain.Qualitative HCN detection was performed using Lorck's alkaline picrate assay (Lorck, 1948). Test strains were cultured in media supplemented with the amino acid glycine. HCN production was detected by placing Whatman No.1 paper discs soaked in alkaline picrate (0.5% picric acid in 2% sodium carbonate) solution a few millimeters above the surface of inoculated media in each well and incubation at 28 °C. Change in the color of filter paper from yellow to light brown, brown and reddish-brown was indicative of HCN production.Bacterial strains were tested for ACC deaminase production as described previously (Ali et al., 2014). Strains were cultured in Dworkin and Fosters ACC Minimal Salts supplemented with AAC as a sole source of nitrogen. Media without ACC and with a nitrogen source (2 g/L of (NH4)2SO4) were used as controls. The ability of a strain to grow in media with ACC was indicative of ACC deaminase production.Bacterial strains were tested for the ability to inhibit the growth of seven plant pathogenic fungal isolates: Aspergillus flavus isolate F06, A. flavus isolate F23, Fusarium equiseti isolate F05, Mangnaporthe grisea isolate MG01, Nigrospora oryzae isolate F25, N. sphaerica isolate F10 and Phoma herbarum isolates F20. Fungal inoculum was prepared by excising 25 mm 2 PDA block from a fresh fungal colony followed by grinding in 300 µl sterile water. A 100 µl of finely ground mycelial suspension was added to 100 ml PDA at 55°C, thoroughly mixed, poured onto 90 mm Petri-dish and allowed to set at room temperature. Thereafter, 10 µl of fresh bacterial cells of each bacterial test strain was spotted onto the plates and incubated at 28 °C for 7-10 days to allow the fungi and bacteria to grow together. Inhibition of fungal growth around the bacterial colonies is indicative of antifungal activity of test strain.Thirty of 84 bacterial strains with varied functional properties and water inoculated control were tested in a greenhouse for biomass production using a maize seedling system. Three maize seeds of variety H614 (KALRO/KSCO) were planted in pots filled with heat-sterilized virgin forest soil and each seedling inoculated with 2 ml of bacterial suspension (10 8 bacterial cells per ml) while control plants were inoculated with 2 ml of sterile water. Each treatment was done in two replications, and the experiment was repeated twice. Inoculated plants were maintained in a greenhouse (daily mean minimum temperature of 20.35°C, mean maximum temperature of 23.41°C and mean relative humidity of 51.32 to 66.9% and 12 hours day length) for three weeks. Plants were harvested, dried at 60°C for 72 hours and weighed for biomass. Roots and shoots biomass data was recorded and the effect of inoculation on maize seedling biomass determined by mean separation using standard errors of means.A total of 84 bacterial strains were successfully isolated from Brachiaria leaf, roots and rhizoplane soils. Bacterial strains from leaf, roots and rhizoplane soil constituted 32%, 31% and 37% of the total population, respectively. The 16S rDNA sequences were generated for all test strains and homology search in RDP and NCBI databases revealed three phyla, five classes, eight orders, twelve families and fifteen genera (Table 1). The sequences of 50 representative bacterial are available in NCBI Genbank ® Database with accession number KU725918 to KU725967. The frequency of isolation and distribution of the sixteen identified bacterial genera are as presented in Figures 1 & 2. The three most frequently isolated genera were Pseudomonas, Pantoea, and Acinetobacter, representing 23%, 17% and 9% of the population, respectively. Pseudomonas and Pantoea were isolated from all the three sources while Acinetobacter was isolated from roots and rhizoplane soil only.Similarly, Bacillus, Microbacterium, Stenotrophomonas and Enterobacter had two different origins. Five genera (Arthrobacter, Burkholderia, Pectobacterium, Rhizobium, Variovorax and Xanthomonas) were isolated exclusively from roots samples whereas another three genera (Curtobacterium, Herbaspirillium and Shingomonas) were isolated exclusively from leaf samples (Figure 2).All 84 bacterial strains from leaf, roots and rhizoplane soils were tested for six biochemical characteristics: IAA production, siderophores production, phosphate solubilization, hydrogen cyanide production, ACC deaminase activity and antifungal activities (Figure 4). A total of 49 (58%) of the 84 bacterial strains were positive for IAA production (Figure . 4A). Majority of these positive strains were isolated from leaf (43%) and roots (40.8%). On the other hand the majority of the strains that tested negative for IAA production were from rhizoplane soils (65.7%). Fifty seven (51%) of the test strains were positive for siderophore production and these positive strains represented all three sources. The majority of the strains that tested positive for siderophoregenesis belonged to the genus Pseudomonas and was isolated from rhizoplane soil. Most of the strains that were negative for siderophoregenesis were from roots and leaf (Figure 4B). Twenty three (27%) of the test strains were able to grow in media supplemented with ACC as the sole carbon source confirming their ability to produce ACC deaminase (Figure 4C). The majority of these positive strains were Gram negative bacteria belonging to the genera Pseudomonas, Pantoea and Enterobacter. These strains tested positive for other plant growth-promoting properties.Forty seven (56%) of the 84 bacterial strains tested positive for the ability to solubilize phosphates (Figure 4D). This characteristic was evenly distributed among the bacterial strains isolated from the three different sources. Twenty two (26%) of the tests bacterial strains were positive for cyanogenesis with both the negative and positive strains distributed across the three sample sources (Figure 4E). The strains that tested strongly positive for cyanogenesis were mainly from the genus Pseudomonas, and to a lesser extent from the genus Microbacterium and Pantoea.Some bacterial strains were detected with antifungal activities against A. flavus isolate F006, A. flavus isolate F023, M. grisea isolate MG001, N. oryzae isolate F025 and N. sphaerica isolate F010. A total of 15, 12, 4, 2 and 1 strains showed antifungal activities to N. oryzae isolate F025, N. sphaerica isolate F010, A. flavus isolate F006, A. flavus isolate F023 and M. grisea isolate MG001, respectively. Some strains e. g. Pseudomonas spp. strain CSBB-072 and Pectobacterium carotovorum strain CSBB-046 showed antifungal activities against four and three pathogens, respectively (Figure . 4F-L). Majority (79%) of bacterial strains with antifungal activity were from rhizoplane soils and Brachiaria roots.Evaluations of the 84 bacterial strains isolated from Brachiaria grasses and rhizoplane soils for six plant growth promotions (PGP) properties showed that they possessed up to five properties beneficial for plant growth and development (Figure 5). Almost half (48.8%) of the strains had three or more PGP properties whereas only two strains were detected with no PGP activity. The effect of inoculating 30 test strains on the total biomass of maize seedlings was evaluated in two separate experiments. In these two experiments eight test strains were found to consistently produce a positive increase of up to 39% in seedling biomass compared to the un-inoculated control seedlings (Figure 6). The bacterial communities of Brachiaria grasses were composed of many closely related strains, the majority (73%) of which belongs to the phylum Gammaproteobacteria; a result similar to that reported for endophytic bacteria from poplar and willow, rhizoplane bacteria from tree peony and rhizospheric bacteria of maize (García-Salamanca et al., 2006;Han et al., 2011;Taghavi et al., 2009). Gammaproteobacteria respond chemotactically to roots exudates and are very efficient in utilizing plant exudate products (García-Salamanca et al., 2012) therefore they are abundant in rhizoplane soils, roots and leaf samples. Members of the genera Pantoea, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter constituted 23%, 17% and 9% of the microbial populations and were consistently isolated from rhizoplane soils, roots and leaves respectively. This is in line with the bacterial colonization of plants via roots as a form of continuum that starts from the rhizosphere to internal root tissues, to plant vascular systems and eventual colonization of above ground plant tissues (Kloepper et al., 1999).Analysis of the 16S rRNA sequences of 84 bacterial strains detected 50 OTUs belonging to 16 genera at variable frequencies that ranged from one to twenty three; an observation comparable to similar studies for poplar and willow (Taghavi et. al., 2009). The number of bacterial genera isolated from rhizoplane soil, roots and leaf of Brachiaria were 5, 12 and 5, respectively. Bacteria from roots were more diverse than those from leaf whereas rhizoplane soils had the least diversity at genus level. A low diversity in rhizoplane soil bacteria might have been attributed to the high affinity between selected bacterial species and roots exudates resulting in these bacteria out-competing the rest. Phylogenetic analysis of the strains revealed seven distinct clades; with all but one clade dominated by members of the phylum Proteobacteria. This is in agreement with the fact that Proteobacteria are morphologically, physiologically and ecologically extremely diverse accounting for over 45% of all cultured bacteria (Kersters et al., 2006).Endophytes and rhizobacteria are part of the natural microflora of healthy plants and may be considered to be important contributors to plant growth and biological control of pathogens and weeds (Hallmann et al., 1997). Fifty eight percent of the bacterial strains isolated in this study were able to produce the auxin IAA. Production of IAA has been reported for many bacteria and it is assumed that over 80% of the bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere are capable of synthesizing IAA (Khalid et al., 2004). Auxin plays a major role in the regulation of various plant physiological processes such as cell division and enlargement, cell differentiation and cellular response to physical factors like light and gravity (Meuwly and Pilet, 1991). The level of IAA in a plant has an effect on primary root length and formation of adventitious and lateral roots and this consequently influences water and nutrient uptake. A number of plant-associated bacteria have the ability to produce IAA and contribute to plant growth promotion by altering the plant auxin pool (Bharucha et al., 2013). More than half (51%) of the isolated bacterial strains in our study were positive for siderophore production. Siderophores are low molecular weight ironchelating agents secreted by bacteria in iron-limiting conditions to help them scavenge for iron from the environment (Neilands and Nakamura, 1991). The production of siderophores by plant-associated microorganisms stimulates plant growth by depriving the plant pathogens of iron which inhibits the growth of such pathogens (Costa and Loper, 1994). About 56% of test bacterial strains were able solubilize phosphorous; an important plant mineral nutrient that often occurs in abundance in soils but whose availability to plants is limited by the fact that it occurs mainly in the form of insoluble complexes that cannot be taken up by plants (Goldstein, 1986). Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms convert inorganic and organic phosphate complexes into bioavailable forms that can easily be taken up by plants therefore promote plant growth (Hilda and Fraga 1999). The use of such microbes can, therefore, be a sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Similarly, 26% test bacterial strains were able to produce hydrogen cyanide; an attribute that has been demonstrated as one of the mechanisms for biological control of weeds, nematodes and microbial pathogens (Kremer and Souissi, 2001). In bacteria, cyanogenesis has been reported mainly in the genus Pseudomonas (Ryall et al., 2009), a few Bacilli (Grover et al., 2009) and members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Ryall et al., 2008).Twenty seven percent of the isolated bacterial strains were found to produce 1aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase. The hormone ethylene plays a role in various physiological processes in plants, including the breaking of seed dormancy, but sustained high levels in response to biotic and abiotic stress can inhibit root growth and induce senescence (Akhgar et al., 2014). Endophytic bacteria that can produce the enzyme ACC deaminase contribute towards the catabolism of the plant ethylene precursor, ACC, consequently decreasing plant ethylene level and enabling plants to better tolerate biotic and abiotic stresses (Glick et al., 1998(Glick et al., , 2007)). Microbial ability to produce ACC deaminase has been identified as one of the direct mechanisms of plant growth-promotion and has been linked to drought and salt tolerance in various plant species (Akhgar et al., 2014;Glick, 2005;Sgroy et al., 2009). Some bacterial strains from Brachiaria showed antifungal activity against five plant pathogenic fungi as has been demonstrated in several genera of bacteria (Kerr, 1999). Iron-deprivation through siderophores, cyanogenesis and antibiosis through the secretion of enzymes and volatile compounds have been describe as some of the possible mechanisms through which such bacteria effect antifungal activity (Cornelison et al., 2014;Frey-Klett et al., 2011;Minaeva et al., 2008).This study shows that the bacterial community associated with Brachiaria is quite diverse and include strains beneficial for plant growth promotion and suppression of plant pathogens. It is worth noting that an impressive majority (98%) of the isolated strains possess traits that are beneficial for the plant, with 49% of the bacterial strains testing positive for at least three traits beneficial to plants. Brachiaria are extensively cultivated tropical forages known for several desirable attributes such as drought tolerance; adaptation to low fertility soils; high nitrogen use efficiency, less input demand, high biomass production; carbon sequestration and resistance to several pests and diseases. It is fair to assume that some of the PGP attributes identified in the endophytic and rhizoplane bacteria of Brachiaria may have played a role, individually or in combination, in increasing the total biomass of test seedlings inoculated with some of the test strains. What makes Brachiaria so successful even under apparently harsh environmental and low input conditions has been a common cause of speculation among scientists and therefore our current findings on bacterial community composition, and the traits these microbes hold, will provide some evidence base on the role of these microbes for the adaptation and survival of the Brachiaria in such challenging environments.Soils in the semi-arid regions of Kenya are often low in organic matter content (< 1%) and deficient in plant-available nutrients, especially nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Any practice that increases the production of biomass carbon (C) via photosynthesis and slows down the return of C to the atmosphere increases C reserves in the soils through Carbon sequestration process. This would improve the soil quality and productivity (Smith et al., 2007) and make soils more resilient to climate change. One way to achieve this is to increase the amount of biomass C in soil where it is less susceptible to loss. This way the soil becomes a C 'sink' by absorbing atmospheric CO2 from circulation and locking it in organic C from in the soil. Brachiaria grasses are endaphytic and have a greater ability sequester and accumulate large amounts of SOC through their large and extensive roots biomass and survive in dry areas of low soil fertility (Clapperton et al., Fisher et al., 2007;Peters et al., 2012). This makes Brachiaria grasses a better option for livestock feed production and soil improvement.Soil organic matter is an important component of soil quality and productivity. However its measurement alone does not adequately reflect the short term changes in soil quality and nutrient status. Measurements of biologically active fractions of organic matter, such as microbial biomass C (MBC), N (MBN) and P (MBP) reflect changes in soil quality due to more recent (1-5yr) management and cultural practices (Hargreaves et al., 2003). These measurements are based on rapidly changing capacity of both C and N forms in the soils. Microbial biomass is part of the active pool of soil organic matter that plays focal roles in decomposition of organic matters, nutrient cycling and biophysical manipulation of soil structure. It is considered to be a labile reservoir of potentially plant-available nutrients, since it acts as a source and sink of plant nutrients (Brookes et al., 1984). Microbial processes are driven by the availability of decomposable organic C, which highlights the importance of sustaining and improving soil organic matter concentrations if large populations of microbes are to be active in the soil. Roots exudates are a major source of substrate for soil microorganisms. These compounds can be utilized by microorganisms immediately, increasing significantly the diversity, number and activity of microorganisms in the rhizosphere. It has been accounted that nearly 5 to 21% of all photosynthetically fixed C is transferred to the rhizosphere through roots exudates, which range from 20 to 50% of plant biomass (Jones et al., 2009).Organic amendments such as manure, plant residues and roots exudates are a major source of organic substrate in the soil. During the process of biomass turnover, the nutrients may be released slowly and taken up by the crop more efficiently (Brookes et al, 1984;Parham et al., 2003;Gichangi et al., 2010). These nutrients can be utilized by microorganisms immediately, increasing significantly the diversity, number and activity of microorganisms in the rhizosphere. This makes microbial biomass a fundamental component of nutrient cycling in agro-ecosystems and critical in determining soil quality (Belay et al., 2002). Soil microbial biomass is an important early indicator of long term changes in soil (Saffigna et al., 1989;Romaniuk et al., 2011;Lauer et al., 2011) and therefore can be used to determine the level of degradation or improvement of the soil following changes in management and cultural practices (Brookes 1995;Sparling, 1997). We tested the hypothesis that, cultivation of climate smart Brachiaria grasses improves soil quality through increased organic matter resulting from the large roots biomass. The objective of this study was therefore to quantify the amount of soil microbial biomass C, N and P as indicators of improved soil quality resulting from 2-year cultivation of Brachiaria grasses.The experiment was established in November during the short rains of 2013 at the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) Katumani. The site is located (37 ˚28'0''E, 1 ˚58'0''S) 75 km southeast of Nairobi at an elevation of 1580 m above sea level. It receives mean annual rainfall of 717 mm in bimodal pattern with the long rains (LR) occurring from March to May and the short rains (SR) from October to December with peaks in April and November, respectively and a mean temperature of 19.6˚C. The dominant soils are chromic Luvisols, which are low in organic C and highly deficient in N and P and to some extent Zinc (NAAIAP, 2014).Soil samples were collected in November 2013 before establishing the experiment at depths of 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-60 cm, and 60-100 cm using a bucket auger for initial analysis of the soils at the testing site. Plant litter on the soil surface was removed before collecting the soil samples. A composite soil sample, consisting of 12 cores, was collected in a grid pattern from within the 25 × 10 m blocks. Samples from each block were air-dried, visible plant roots removed, and the samples gently crushed to pass through a 2 mm sieve. The fractions sample <2 mm were used for subsequent chemical and physical analyses. Total soil N, available P (Mehlick III), exchangeable K, Ca, and Mg were estimated following standard methods as described by Okalebo et al., (2002). Cations Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , and K + were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry and soil P was measured as described by Murphy and Riley (1962).Soil texture was determined by the hydrometer method. Soil pH was measured in water (soil: water ratio of 1: 2.5) using a pH meter and reference calomel electrode (Model pH 330 SET-1, 82362) after the suspensions were shaken for 30 minutes and allowed to stand for 1 hour. Organic carbon, was determined by the modified Walkley and Black procedure (Nelson and Sommers 1982. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was based on the sum of exchangeable Ca, Mg, K, H and Al after extraction with ammonium acetate. Soil bulk density was determined according to Blake and Hartge (1986). Soils were vertically sampled using stainless steel rings (diameter 10 cm) at soil depths of: 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-60 cm, and 60-100 cm, resulting in undisturbed soil samples for bulk density determination. Soil samples were dried at 65ºC to a constant weight to allow soil bulk density calculation. All determinations were made in triplicate and expressed on a dry weight basis.Tables 1 and 2 below show the initial main soil characteristics of the experimental site. Soil pH was moderately acidic in all the depths (Table 1) and organic C content was low and decreased with depth. Similarly, N, P and Zn were low. Calcium, K and Fe levels in the soil were adequate (Table 1). Physical analysis of soil samples from the test site indicated that the soils were sandy clay loam in the 0 -30cm depth and clay in the lower depths (Table 2). Cation exchange capacity ranged from 20.2 to 27.8 me%, increasing with depth. This was expected as the clay content also increased with depth resulting to increased number of exchange sites (Table 2). Bulk density ranged from 1.32 to 1.45 g cm -3 and was greater than the ideal range of 1.1-1.3 g cm -3 for non-restricted plant root growth. Soil bulk density exceeding 1.46 g cm -3 for such soils would restrict root growth and could negatively interfere with soil aeration through reduced air-filled pore space (Landon, 1991). ] and a bare plot (as negative control). These treatments were evaluated in the plots with fertilizer (40 kg P ha -1 applied at sowing and 50 kg N top-dressed in each wet season) and without fertilizer application. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design in a split plot arrangement (fertilizer treatments as main plots and the grass treatments as sub plots) in three replications. The grasses were sown in November 2013 during the short rains. All the plots were kept free of weeds throughout the experimental period by hand weeding. The grasses were first harvested 16 weeks after establishment and later, on an 8-week interval harvestings during the wet seasons.Data for aboveground plant biomass was collected eight times on an 8 weeks interval after plants were well established. The establishment period was considered as 16 weeks after seedling emergence. Harvesting of plant shoots was conducted from 2 m x 2 m net plots at a cutting height of 5 cm above ground. Samples of fresh shoots biomass were recorded, and approximately 500g subsamples were dried at 65°C to constant weight in forced-air drier for determination of dry matter. Roots were sampled using the soil-core method (Bolinder, et al., 2002). In each plot, four soil cores were randomly taken with a 5 cm diameter stainless steel auger to a depth of 0-15 and 15-30 cm from the inter-row and intra-row positions and composited into one sample per plot for each depth. The sampling was carried out at least 1m apart from the edge of the plot to avoid edge effects. Sampling was conducted at 24 and 48 weeks of plants establishment. The roots from each soil layer were washed separately by hand with a 2.8 mm and a 2 mm soil sieve under running tap water. Root samples integrating both living and dead roots were then dried at 65°C to constant weight and roots dry weights were recorded.Soil samples for microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus analysis were collected in November 2015 twenty four months after the grasses had established. Four soil samples were carefully collected from a depth of 0-10 cm using an auger in each pasture plot and from the bare plot controls. In this study, only the top 10 cm soil was sampled which was assumed to contain the highest biological activity and most likely exhibit short-term changes in response to Brachiaria grasses cultivation. Soils from the four sampling positions of a plot were pooled to one sample and used in the subsequent analysis as described below.Microbial biomass C, N and P were determined on field moist soil (18-23% by weight) by the chloroform fumigation-extraction technique as described in Brookes et al. (1984Brookes et al. ( , 1985) ) and Vance et al. (1987). Briefly, 10 g dry weight equivalent of soil was fumigated with ethanolfree chloroform in a glass desiccator; and another 10g was incubated without fumigation at the same moisture content, time period and temperature for 24 h at 25°C. Both sets were extracted with 0.5 M K2SO4 (for C and N) or 0.5 M NaHCO3 (for P). Soil microbial biomass element content was calculated as the difference between the fumigated and un-fumigated samples and corrected for incomplete recovery using conversion factors of 0.45 for C (Wu et al., 1990), 0.45 for N (Jenkinson et al., 2004) and 0.40 for P (Hedley et al., 1982). All determinations were made in triplicate and expressed on a dry weight basis.The concentrations of the microbial biomass C, N and P were compared by 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using GenStat statistical software (GenStat Release 4. 24DE, 2005). This was evaluated by running a full model (20 treatments, 19 df), which was further split into a fertilizer effect (1 df), cultivar effect (9 df), fertilizer*cultivar effect (9 df). Differences at p 0.05 were considered significant and means separation was done using Fischer's protected least significant difference (LSD). Regression analyses and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were used to find models best describing the relationships between soil microbial biomass and other soil and plant properties.Although it is only a small part of soil organic C, the soil microbial biomass is regarded as one of the most sensitive indicators of ecosystem function. The effects of the different Brachiaria cultivars and fertilizer application on microbial biomass were significant (p≤0.05). Microbial biomass C was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in grass vegetated soils compared to bare plots (Table 3).The MBC ranged from 23.9 to 200.5 mg C kg -1 of soil and 12.9 to 107.9 mg C kg -1 of soil in the fertilized and non-fertilized treatments, respectively. The highest MBC in cultivated Brachiaria soils was recorded under Mulato II hybrid and lowest under MG4 (Table 3). The effects of the different treatments on MBC followed the order Mulato II hybrid > Basilisk > Marandu > Xaraes > Llanero > KK1 > Piatã > MG4 > KAT R3 > bare for plots that received N and P fertilizer. Microbial biomass C increased in the grass plots probably due to rhizo-deposition (Benizri et al., 2007). Rhizo-deposition may occur by roots exudation and root cell sloughing (Rasse et al., 2005). These compounds represent a source of labile C in soil, which is rapidly consumed by micro-organisms (Jones et al., 2009), thereby stimulating microbial biomass production (Benizri et al., 2007). Similarly, MBC had a higher range of values in fertilized plots. This small component of the soil organic matter has been shown to be more responsive to cultural treatments than is total soil organic matter (Jenkinson et al., 2004). There was a highly significant interaction effect (p < 0.01) of grass cultivars by fertilizer application on MBN (Table 4). Among the N and P fertilized treatments, the soils under cv.Marandu had the highest MBN (21.2 mg N kg -1 soil) whereas cv. Mulato II hybrid had the highest MBN (14.6 mg N kg -1 soil) in non-fertilized treatments (Table 4). However, the amounts of MBN of soils under cv. Marandu in the N and P treatments were statistically similar to those recorded from soils under cultivars Mulato II, Basilisk, KK1, Xaraes, Llanero, and Piatã (Table 4). The bare plot treatment had the least amount of microbial N (1.5 mg N kg -1 soil) and (1.1 mg N kg -1 soil) in the N and P fertilized and un-fertilized treatments respectively. This indicates that the cultivated grasses had greater contribution to the amounts of MBN recorded. The increases in MBN in the grasses plots due to N addition may be attributed to increased N availability to soil microorganisms. Gama Rodrigues et al. (2005) reported that only 40 to 60% fertilizer N is absorbed by plants, while 20-50% of the applied N is incorporated into the soil as organic N which contributes to the microbial biomass.Studies on the effects of fertilizer application on soil microbial biomass remain equivocal. For instance, Zhang et al. (2005) measured significant increase of soil microbial biomass after two year of N fertilization in deteriorated grassland in China. However, Sarathchandra et al. (2001) reported significant decrease of soil microbial biomass in a perennial pasture of New Zealand due N fertilization. Meanwhile, Johnson et al. (2005) found that no effect of N applications on soil microbial biomass in upland grassland in Scotland. The mechanisms behind the variations may depend on other soil features, such as soil moisture, soil organic grasses were comparable to the widely grown Napier grass (cv. KK1). During growth, Brachiaria grasses may also have encouraged higher microbial populations within their rhizosphere, which contributed to the increased MBP. Phosphate immobilization by microorganisms is an important sink, which contributes to microbial P pool. Addition of N and P fertilizers doubled the MBP in all the grass cultivars. The P concentration in the microbial biomass in this study falls within the range reported earlier (Brookes et al., 1984;Singh, 2007). It has been reported that incorporation of P into the soil microbial biomass is a mechanism that significantly increases the availability of P to plants and forms a significant pool of plant nutrients (Nziguheba et al., 1998). This pool play a key role in P dynamics in soils by immobilizing inorganic P which is later mineralized (Parham et al., 2003;Gichangi et al., 2009, Gichangi et al., 2010). For example, Nziguheba et al. (1998) reported increased soil MBP and decreased P sorption following incorporation of wild sunflower (Tithonia diversifolia) as green manure in an acid soil in western Kenya.A high microbial biomass may indicate greater accumulations of C, N and P in the organic pool, and could represent either a sink or a source of plant-available nutrients, depending on the soil management. The higher C, N and P in the soil microbial biomass under Brachiaria grasses in this study may be due to a higher capacity of nutrient immobilization by the microbes from the decomposing litter fall and roots residues in addition to the roots exudates released which serves as substrate for microbial growth in the soil. Roots exudates are a major source of substrate for soil microorganisms. These compounds can be utilized by microorganisms immediately, increasing significantly the diversity, number and activity of microorganisms in the rhizosphere. It has been accounted that nearly 5 to 21% of all photosynthetically fixed C is transferred to the rhizosphere through roots exudates, which range from 20 to 50% of plant biomass (Jones et al., 2009). Due to its highly dynamic character, the microbial biomass responds more rapidly to soil fertility than the physical/chemical properties, which change relatively slowly (Sparling, 1997) and this might explain measurable changes in microbial biomass in the N and P fertilized plots in this study. The amounts of roots in the plots with fertilizer were significantly higher than no fertilize plots (Figure 1). Increasing roots biomass influences soil organic matter: i) directly by increasing organic inputs to soil and ii) indirectly by influencing the location of roots and production of roots exudates that may stimulate mineralization (Jones et al., 2009). Roots exudates and other by-products are also more readily absorbed and protected by soil aggregates and where concentrated are more likely to persist in the particulate organic matter and humus fractions than shoots-derived soil organic C (Clapperton et al., 2003;Walker et al., 2003;Zhang et al., 2005). There were a number of significant correlations between microbial biomass and soil and plant properties (Figure 2; Table 6). Microbial biomass N and P showed a significant positive correlation with microbial biomass C (Figure 2). Multiple regression across all treatments showed that there were high coefficients of determination between MBC and MBN (r 2 = 0.83, p < 0.01, Figure 2a), MBC and MBP (r 2 = 0.85, p < 0.01, Figure 2b) as well between MBN and MBP (r 2 = 0.82, p < 0.01, Figure 2c). This results show evidence that soil C, N and P cycles are intimately related through the processes of mineralization and immobilization, suggesting a strong relationship that may exist between soil N and P transformations and soil C.Microbial biomass was significantly and positively correlated to soil organic carbon (r = 0.3139, p < 0.05); (r = 0.4596, p = 0.01) and (r = 0.2583, p = 0.05) for MBC, MBN and MBP, respectively and total N (r = 0.356, p < 0.05); (r = 0.5029, p = 0.01) and (r = 0.3521, p = 0.05) for MBC, MBN and MBP, respectively (Table 6). This indicates that microbial biomass is highly influenced by the concentration of soil nutrients. Positive relationship between microbial biomass C, N and P and soil organic C and total N in grassland has been reported elsewhere by Moore et al. (2000). Similarly, microbial biomass correlated, significantly and positively, to roots biomass measured at various stages of growth 24 and 48 weeks after plants had established (Table 6). However a stronger relationship was recorded for roots biomass measured 24 th week (Table 6). Roots are major C source in soil and can also stimulate SOM mineralization (Jones et al., 2009). The capacity to generate roots, in part explains why perennials and pastures are sometimes associated with increasing soil organic matter compared to annuals. In conclusion, soil microbial biomass C, N and P in this study varied in the different grass types and was higher in the N and P fertilizer treatments and were therefore useful parameters to elucidate the changes of organic matter in the different grass type's soils. The results showed a significant enrichment of the microbial biomass component of organic matter due to the cultivation of the grasses and which was further enhanced by applications of N and P fertilizer. Microbial biomass is part of the active pool of soil organic matter which determines the part of labile organic matter that can easily be decomposed leading to nutrient mineralization. Soil microbial biomass comprises only 1 to 3% of the total organic carbon (C) in the soil but is a labile fraction of the soil organic matter (Jenkinson and Ladd, 1981). Changes in organic matter input or rate of decomposition are more readily determined from soil microbial biomass than the total organic matter (Powlson et al., 1987).The flow of C, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) through the microbial biomass is useful in assessing soil quality in farming systems (Sparling et al., 1991;Tangjang et al., 2010). Accumulation of soil microbial biomass (SMB) is affected by management systems employed in the soil. Human activities including tillage, conversion of agricultural land to forage grassland and fertilizer inputs can lead to alteration of biogeochemical cycles and nutrient enrichment or depletion especially N and P (Burger and Jackson, 2003). Assessment of soil microbial biomass gives an indication of management induced changes brought about by these activities.Generally, SMB is higher in grass systems than in open cultivated cropland because of the high turnover in pasture systems. However, while investigating the effects of different grass species in four separate soil types, Groffman et a.l (1996) found significant impact of soil type but small and infrequent differences in SMB and microbial activity due to grass species. Application of N and P fertilizers to grasslands can influence the root growth, shoots dry matter accumulations and therefore lead to increased microbial biomass especially in low organic matter sandy soils (Gichangi et al. 2016;Li et al. 2014). However, other authors have reported no differences in microbial C due to N and P fertilization (Li et al. 2010). Humid regions of Kenya are threatened by declining soil fertility and low soil organic matter due to continuous cropping and tillage. The introduction of high quality grass species with increased roots biomass may improve the microbial biomass and restore fertility of degraded lands. The study was conducted in the north western highlands to assess the effects of Brachiaria grasses on soil pH, available P and microbial biomass in a low fertility soil.The experiments were conducted at the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO), Kitale farm, located in Trans Nzoia County within the north western highlands of Kenya. The site (1° 0′ 6.6´´N and 34° 59´ 10´´E) lies within the Upper Midlands (UM4) agro-ecological zone at an elevation of 1890 m asl. The site has a cool and temperate climate with mean annual temperatures between 10 0 C and 27 0 C. The mean annual precipitation is 1100 mm, is unimodal and normally starts in April and continues through to October/November with peak in May and August. The soils in the study site are mainly humic Acrisols (FAO, 2006;Jones et al., 2013). Acrisols have low fertility, are mainly N and P deficient, with a weak to moderate sub-angular blocky structure, low organic matter (NAAIAP and KARI, 2014) and are well drained with high moisture storage capacity.Soil samples to assess initial soil physical and chemical properties were collected prior to commencement of the trials using a soil auger. Samples were taken using a w-pattern from four depths: 0 -15 cm, 15 -30 cm, 30 -60 cm, and 60 -100 cm thoroughly mixed and a sub sample taken from each depth for each block. After air drying, the samples were gently crushed to pass through a 2-mm sieve. Available P (Mehlick III), exchangeable K, Ca, Mg and total N were estimated after wet digestion with H2O2/H2SO4 as described by Okalebo et al. (2002). Total Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , and K + were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry and P measured as described by Murphy and Riley (1962). Soil pH was measured in water (soil: water ratio of 1: 2.5) using a pH meter with a glass and reference calomel electrode (Model pH 330 SET-1, 82362). Soils were vertically sampled using stainless steel rings (diameter 10 cm) for different depths; resulting in undisturbed soil samples for bulk density determination as described by Blake and Hartge (1986). The samples were dried to 65ºC to a constant weight to allow soil bulk density calculations. All determinations were made in triplicate and expressed on a dry weight basis.The bulk density ranged from 1.34 to 1.49 g/cm 3 in Kitale, which was within the normal range (<1.5 g/cm 3 ) that doesn't restrict root growth in soil as proposed by Hunt and Gilkes (1992). Soil pH was generally medium acidic, but slightly more acidic in the 30 -60 cm depth (Table 1). Deficiencies of N, available P and Zn were observed with nutrient levels decreasing with depth. Soil organic C ranged from 0.2-0.3% and these levels are generally considered low (Okalebo et al. 2002). Soil organic C is an indicator of soil quality, due to its contribution to microbial activity, soil structure and promotion of water storage and drainage. However, K, Ca, Mg and Mn were adequate. These treatments were arranged in a split plot and randomized in complete block design with either fertilizer application (40 kg P ha -1 and 50 kg N ha -1 per season) or no fertilizer in the main plot and the grasses as subplots and replicated four times. Phosphorus was applied at planting as Triple Super Phosphate (46% P205) while N was top dressed with Calcium Ammonium Nitrate (CAN 26% N) each season. The bare plots were kept weed free throughout the experimental period by hand weeding. These treatments were tested in subplots of 4 m by 4 m. Seeds were drilled by hand in about 2 cm deep furrows at a rate of 5 kg ha -1 for Brachiaria and 10 kg ha -1 for Rhodes grass in a well prepared land. The inter-row spacing was 0.5 m. Splits of Napier grass was planted at 1 m x 0.5 m spacing. Minimum tillage was practiced throughout the growth period to minimize root damage. After establishment period (14 weeks after seedling emergence -WAE) the grasses were harvested at a cutting height of 5 cm above the ground in an effective area of 4 m 2 using sickles and removed from the plot to stimulate uniform growth. Subsequent harvests were made every eight weeks, to determine shoots biomass yields as this was recommended management practice for the grass (Kifuko et al., 2016, this proceedings).Roots biomass assessment was carried out after 24 months. Roots were sampled using the soilcore method (Bohm, 1979). Four soil cores were randomly taken using a stainless steel auger at 0 -15 cm and 15 -30 cm depths from the intra-and inter-row spacing in each plot. To prevent edge effects, the samples were taken at least 1 m from the edges. The samples from each depth were thoroughly mixed, weighed to determine the total bulk soil weight and a sub sample was taken for moisture correction. The roots contained in the samples were recovered under a tap of running water at low pressure using 2.8 cm and 2 cm mesh sieves (Bohm, 1979). Samples were dried in an air-forced oven at 65º C to constant weight and then weighed for determination of dry roots weight. The roots biomass was calculated as a factor of the bulk density for each depth.Soil samples were collected from 0 -10 cm in each plot at the intra-row and inter-row positions to target the rhizosphere soil under Brachiaria grasses two years after the grasses had established. The sub samples from each plot were thoroughly mixed, large plant material removed and samples packaged in sterile polythene bags and packaged in ice boxes for transportation to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the samples were stored at 4 o C until analysis of the microbial properties. The microbial biomass C (MBC) was determined by a fumigation extraction method according to Vance et al. (1987). The microbial biomass N (MBN) was determined using Brookes et al. (1985), while ammonium and nitrate N were determined as highlighted by Anderson and Ingram (1993). All determinations were conducted in triplicate and expressed on dry weight basis.Analysis of variance was undertaken to determine the effect of fertilizer N and P on microbial biomass, soil pH and available P using Statistix 10 package (Statistix, 2003). Means were separated using the Tukey's HD test. Where ANOVA was significant (P≤0.05), Pearson correlation was performed to assess relationships between MBN, MBC, shoots and roots biomass.The effect of Brachiaria grasses on MBC and MBN is shown in Table 2. No significant fertilizer NP differences (P > 0.05) were noted in either the MBC or MBN. The amount of MBC accumulated in this site was lower (79 -128 mg N kg -1 soil) than the ranges of 121 -200 mg N kg -1 soil reported elsewhere by Gichangi et al. (2016). Due to the low initial N and P in this site (Table 1), the nutrient rates applied were probably not sufficient to improve N availability. Organic C was also low and probably recalcitrant hence, with removal of shoots biomass, accumulation of C in the roots through roots exudates did not contribute to sufficient C for microbial activities. Soils without sufficient labile C may hinder microbial biomass as labile C provides a readily available energy source for microbial decomposition (Hoyle and Murphy, 2006). Nonetheless, Llanero, Mulato II, Marandu gave higher MBC and MBN while Basilisk and Rhodes grass had lower microbial biomass.NH4 -N and NO3 -N was significantly (P=0.034) influenced by the grass cultivars. The pools of NH4 + N and NO3 -N were higher in bare plot and Napier grass which also accumulated lower MBC and MBN. The high accumulation of NO3 -N in the bare plot is due to lack of plant uptake and increased nitrification. NH4 + N was the most dominant form of inorganic N in Llanero, Marandu and Piata. These cultivars also had lower NO3 -N, MBC and MBN an indication of either low nitrification rates or a high rate of NO3 -N uptake by plants. Nitrification is a biological process that converts NH4 -N to NO3 -N creating acidification in the process as noted in the bare, Mulato II, Napier and Rhodes grass plots (Table 2). There were no varietal differences in MBC, MBN since the nutrients applied were not sufficient to improve N availability in these low fertility soils. Piata and Llanero had high NH4-N:NO3-N ratio and may have lowered the nitrification processes. However, further studies are required to ascertain the role of the two grasses as potential biological nitrogen inhibitors.Soil aggregation is among the key short term indicators of soil quality associated with changes in land management. The aggregate stability of soils improve under certain crops, notably grasses and these improvements are frequently associated with increases in soil organic carbon (SOC) levels caused by plant residues (Lal et al., 2003;Marquez et al 2004;Denef et al., 2007). Low SOC, weak soil structural stability and degradation are common attributes of most semiarid soils of eastern Kenya (Gicheru et al., 2004). Agricultural practices that could improve SOC, coupled with increase in soil surface cover, would significantly increase soil aggregate stability and reduce the soil degradation. Soil aggregate stability, defined as the ability of the aggregates to remain intact when subject to a given stress, is an important soil property that affects the movement and storage of water, aeration, erosion, biological activity and plant growth (Spohn and Giani, 2011;Pohl et al., 2012). There exist complex interactions between SOC storage and aggregate stability. Soil organic carbon, can encapsulate within stable aggregates thereby offering protection against microbial processes and enzymatic reaction (Lal et al., 2003;Holeplass et al., 2004).The size of aggregates and aggregation state can be influenced by different agricultural activities that alter the content of SOC and the biological activity of the soil (Mills and Fey, 2003;Wick et al., 2009;Fonte et al., 2014). The article by Bronick and Lal (2005) provides overview of chemical compounds that are thought to be involved in the formation of soil aggregates, a list of factors that determine extent of this aggregation, and a description of the influence of soil structure on a wide range of soil processes. Over short periods, the stability of soil aggregates is modified under the influence of different cropping practices, probably being more related to changes in the organic constituents than to the actual total organic matter content (Reid and Goss, 1980;Milne and Haynes, 2004). Reid and Goss (1980) for example, demonstrated that after only 4 weeks growth the living roots of perennial rye grass (Lolium perenne) increased the aggregate stability of a sandy loam as measured by turbidimetric and wet sieving analyses which was most strongly associated with the larger aggregates. This effect was probably caused by organic substances released from the roots which either stabilized the aggregates directly or indirectly after microbial colonization (Leifeld et al., 2005;Franchini et al., 2007). However, over long periods of time, the stability of soil aggregates diminishes as the SOC content declines as a result of it being used as an energy source by the microorganisms in the soil (Mills and Fey, 2003). Loss of SOC will therefore reduce soil fertility, degrade soil structure and water holding capacity and ultimately, leads to land degradation. Grasses, present the greatest effect on the aggregation and aggregate stability due to their extensive roots system (Harris et al., 1996). Brachiaria grasses are endaphytic and have a greater ability sequester and accumulate large amounts of SOC through their large and extensive roots biomass and survive in dry areas of low soil fertility (Fisher et al., 2007;Peters et al., 2012). This makes Brachiaria grasses a better option for livestock feed production and soil improvement.The resistance of soil aggregates to breakdown from physical forces is a measure of coherence or strength of cementation between or within soil aggregates. Aggregate size is important in determining the dimensions of pore space in cultivated soils. The size of the pores in turn affects the movement and distribution of water and aeration that are major factors affecting plant growth. Soil organic carbon increases aggregate water repellence therefore minimising their disruption and breakdown when wetted through mechanical manipulation such as tillage (Chenu et al., 2000). Soil aggregation can be determined by mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean weight diameter (GMD) and aggregate stability (AS, %) index, which are obtained by fractioning the soil material into aggregate classes by wet sieving (Kemper and Rosenau, 1986).Disruption of soil structure is common in semi-arid zones of eastern Kenya, due to the inherent soil type that has weak structure, overgrazing, compaction, and poor land management, which have negative consequences on SOC storage and degradation of the soil structure. There is therefore a need to examine the potential effects of introduced Brachiaria grasses on aggregation and stability of aggregates in these fragile soils. The objective of this study was therefore, to investigate the short-term (2-years) changes in aggregate size distribution and the stability of soil aggregates following cultivation of Brachiaria grasses. We examined linkages between SOC, particulate organic matter (POM), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and roots biomass with aggregation by comparing Brachiaria cultivated soils verses commonly grown Napier and Rhodes fodders and not cultivated weed free soils. We tested the hypothesis that, cultivation of Brachiaria grasses improves soil aggregation through increased SOC and aggregate associated C resulting from large roots biomass.The experiment was conducted at the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO), Katumani farm between November 2013 and November 2015. The site is located (37 ˚28'0''E, 1 ˚58'0''S) 75 km south-east of Nairobi at an elevation of 1580 m above sea level. It receives mean annual rainfall of 717 mm in bimodal pattern with the long rains (LR) occurring from March to May and the short rains (SR) from October to December with peaks in April and November, respectively. The mean temperature is 19.6˚C. The dominant soils are chromic luvisols, which are low in organic C, highly deficient in N and P and to some extent Zinc (NAAIAP, 2014) and generally have poor structure.Composite soil samples from 12 sampling positions within a plot were collected in November 2013 before establishing the experiment at depths of 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-60 cm, and 60-100 cm using a bucket auger for initial characterization of the soils. Plant litter on the soil surface was removed before collecting the soil samples. Samples were air-dried, visible roots removed, and the samples gently crushed to pass through a 2-mm sieve. The sample was used for subsequent chemical and physical analyses. Total soil N, available P (Mehlick III), exchangeable K, Ca, and Mg were estimated following standard methods as described by Okalebo et al. (2002). Cations Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , and K + were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry and soil P was measured as described by Murphy and Riley (1962).Soil texture was determined by the hydrometer method. Soil pH was measured in water (soil: water ratio of 1: 2.5 w/w) using a pH meter and reference calomel electrode (Model pH 330 SET-1, 82362) after the suspensions were shaken for 30 minutes and allowed to stand for 1 hour. Organic carbon was determined by the modified Walkley and Black procedure (Nelson and Sommers 1982). Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was based on the sum of exchangeable Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , K + , H + and Al 3+ after extraction with ammonium acetate. Soil bulk density was determined according to Blake and Hartge (1986). Soils were vertically sampled using stainless steel rings with 10 cm diameter at depths of 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-60 cm, and 60-100 cm, resulting in undisturbed soil samples for bulk density determination. Soil samples were dried at 65º C to a constant weight. All determinations were made in triplicate and expressed on a dry weight basis.Soil characteristics of the experimental site are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Soil pH was moderately acidic in all the depths (Table 1) and soil organic C content was low and decreased with increasing depth. Similarly N, P and Zn were low. Physical analysis of soil samples from the test site indicated that the soils were sandy clay loam in the 0-30 cm depth and clay in the lower depths (Table 2). Cation exchange capacity ranged from 20.2 to 27.8 me%, and increased with depth. This is expected as the clay content also increased with depth resulting to increased number of exchange sites (Table 2). Bulk density ranged from 1.32 to 1.45 g cm -3 and was greater than the ideal range of 1.1-1.3 g cm -3 for non-restricted roots growth. Soil bulk density exceeding 1.46 g cm -3 for such soils would restrict root growth and negatively interfere with soil aeration through reduced air-filled pore space (Landon, 1991). ] and a bare plot (as negative control). These treatments were evaluated in the plots with fertilizer (40 kg P ha -1 applied at sowing and 50 kg N top-dressed in each wet season) and without fertilizer application. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design in a split plot arrangement (fertilizer treatments as main plots and the grass treatments as sub plots) in three replications. The grasses were sown in November 2013 during the short rains. All the plots including the bare plots were kept weed free throughout the experimental period by hand weeding. The grasses were first harvested 16 weeks after establishment and later, harvestings were done eight times on an 8 weeks interval during the 5 wet seasons.Roots were sampled using the soil-core method (Bolinder, et al., 2002). In each plot, four soil cores were randomly taken to a depth of 0-15 and 15-30 cm, two each from the inter-row and intra-row spacing and composited into one sample per plot for each depth. The sampling was carried out using a 5 cm diameter stainless steel auger at least 1m apart from the edge of the plot to avoid edge effects. Sampling was conducted at 24 and 48 weeks after establishment, high roots accumulation was expected at these sampling periods. The roots from each soil layer were washed separately by hand with a 2.8 mm and a 2 mm soil sieve under running tap water. Root samples integrating both living and dead roots were then dried at 65°C to constant weight and roots dry weights were recorded.Particulate organic matter was separated from water-stable aggregate fractions by floatation and decanting after mechanical dispersion of the soil by agitation in water with glass beads. The collected organic size fraction was oven dried at 65 o C for 24 h and their weight determined. The soil POM was expressed in g kg -1 after adjusting for soil moisture using the weight loss of subsamples oven dried at 105 o C to a constant weight.Microbial biomass C was determined on field moist soil (18-23% by weight) by the chloroform fumigation-extraction technique as described in Vance et al. (1987) on soils sampled in November 2015 as described above. Briefly, 10 g dry weight equivalent of soil was fumigated with ethanol-free chloroform in a glass desiccator; and another 10 g was incubated without fumigation at the same moisture content, time period and temperature for 24 h at 25°C. Both sets were extracted with 0.5 M K2SO4 for microbial biomass C determination. Soil microbial biomass element content was calculated as the difference between the fumigated and unfumigated samples and corrected for incomplete recovery using conversion factors of 0.45 for C (Vance et al., 1987). All determinations were made in triplicate and expressed on a dry weight basis.Treatment effects on soil aggregate stability and POM were tested using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) as a split-plot with fertilizer NP as the main factor and grass type as the sub-plot factor using GENSTAT statistical software (GENSTAT Release 4. 24DE, 2005). This was evaluated by running a full model (20 treatments, 19 df) which was further split into a fertilizer effect (1 df), cultivar effect (9 df), fertilizer*cultivar effect (9 df). Differences at p 0.05 were considered significant and means separation was done using Fischer's protected Least Significant Difference test (LSD). Regression analyses and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were used to find models best describing the relationships between soil aggregate stability and other soil and plant properties.The growth of perennial grasses enhance aggregate formation due to the production of large quantities of polysaccharide and phenolic binding agents by the large microbial biomass in the pasture rhizosphere (Milne and Haynes, 2004). Additionally, the fine grass roots and associated fungal hyphae physically enmesh fine soil particles into aggregates (Milne and Haynes, 2004).The results of aggregate size distribution and stability determinations are presented in Table 3.The effects of grass types on the proportion of aggregate size fractions 250-2000, 53-250 and <53μm were significantly (p<0.01) different. The small macro-aggregates (250-2000 μm) comprised the largest proportion, which accounted for 34.1 -64.2% of the total soil dry weight, and the fraction of micro-aggregates (53-250 μm) was the second largest, being 28.5-48.2% of whole soil dry weight. The large macro-aggregates (>2000 μm) and silt + clay (<53μm) fractions were the least components. The silt + clay fractions accounted for only 8.9-17.6% of whole soil dry weight (Table 3). In contrast, there were no significant differences (p≥0.05) in the distributions of water stable aggregates with aggregates sizes >2000 μm between the grass types intermediate in the decay continuum between fresh litter and humified organic matter has high sensitivity to management than total soil organic carbon (Grandy and Robertson, 2006;Todd et al., 2015). The POM fraction hosts a large concentration of microorganisms because it provides a substrate for their activities (Zhang et al., 2014). The POM and MBC are therefore important in maintaining soil structure in that the microorganisms associated with them in the decomposition process exude mucilaginous carbohydrate material which acts as a glue and helps cement soil aggregates together. For example, MBC has been shown to be positively correlated with aggregate stability, indicating the important role of MBC in aggregation (Milne and Haynes, 2004). The analysis of light organic fractions separated from wet sieved aggregates showed that POM differed between the grass types (Table 3). The POM concentration in 0-10 cm depth ranged from the minimum of 0.16 g kg -1 in the bare soil plots to the maximum of 0.93 g kg -1 in soil under B. hybrid cv. Mulato II (Table 3). The gains in POM within macro-aggregates shown here concur with the results of others that suggest macro-aggregates may be good predictors of potential C responses to changes in agro-ecosystems management (Grandy and Robertson, 2006;Todd et al., 2015). This also supports the findings of Six et al. (2002) who reported that soil aggregation was enhanced as soil organic matter increased, due to increased production of organic matter derived binding agents resulting from the activity of microbes on deposited residues in soils. While we found that total SOC did not vary among Brachiaria grasses over the short duration of the study (Table 3), changes in below ground C cycling were apparent through aggregates formation. Aggregation increased over the two years of this study in all grass types compared to the bare control treatment, with B. hybrid cv. Mulato II and B. brizantha cv. Marandu showing the largest proportion of small macro-aggregates and mean weight diameter (Table 3).The effect of grass types on roots biomass was significantly different with higher roots biomass recorded in treatments with cvs. Xaraes, Marandu, Piatã and cv. Basilisk (Figure 1). The amounts of roots recorded in the fertilized plots in this study were also significantly higher than where fertilizers N and P were not added for cv. Llanero, cvs. Piatã, Xaraes and B. hybrid cv.Mulato II) and Pennisetum purpureum cv. Kakamega 1 (Figure 1). Generally, the composition of POM consists mainly of roots fragments (Cambardella and Elliot, 1992) and therefore this affirms that significant differences in the levels of POM observed in this study were due to differences in the amounts of roots biomass among grass types. Reid and Goss (1980) for example demonstrated that after only 4 weeks growth the living roots of perennial rye grass (Lolium perenne) increased the aggregate stability of a sandy loam soil. Plant roots can increase aggregation by enmeshing small particles into stable macro-aggregates; by supplying organic substrates such as sloughed cells and mucilage and by influencing soil moisture content (Grandy and Robertson, 2006). According to Broersma et al. (1997), crops affect soil structure differently because of diverse rooting habits, type of organic matter and the rhizosphere processes. Increasing roots biomass influences soil organic matter: i) directly by increasing organic inputs to soil and ii) indirectly by influencing the production of root exudates that may stimulate mineralization (Jones et al., 2009). Roots exudates and other by-products are also more readily absorbed and protected by soil aggregates and where concentrated are more likely to persist in the POM and humus fractions than shoots-derived SOC (Clapperton et al., 2003;Walker et al., 2003;Hurisso, et al., 2013;Zhang et al., 2014). Depending on the roots turnover rates the amount of C stored in the soil can be determined from the roots biomass, plant residue and SOC. Commonly, roots mass and plant residue in the soil form between 3,400 (annual crop) and 17,000 (perennial grasses) kg ha -1 year -1 of the soil biomass (Harwood et al., 1998).Figure 1 Effects of cultivar and fertilizer N and P on roots biomass (0-15 cm depth) 1 year after the grasses were established Particulate organic matter and MBC all act as important binding agents for aggregation (Six et al., 2004;Bronick and Lal, 2005). Previous studies have reported that soil aggregate stability was strongly correlated with POM and MBC in different soils (Six et al., 2002). Regression of the proportional weights of the 250-2000 μm aggregates fraction and MWD with POM showed that POM explained 79.4% and 81.7% of the variations of the aggregates fraction and MWD, respectively (Figure 2). Similar results were also reported by Ashagrie et al. (2007) and Spohn and Giani (2011), who suggested that POM contribute to soil aggregation as it acts as nucleation sites for the formation of macro-aggregates . The proportional weights of the 250-2000 μm aggregates fraction and MWD in this study was found to be positively but weakly correlated with MBC (Figure 3) which however indicated that soil aggregation and stability increased with increasing levels of MBC in the bulk soil. Overall, POM made the greatest direct contributions to aggregate stability (Figure 2), suggesting that greater POM in Brachiaria cultivated soils enhanced aggregate stability and by extension improved soil structure was comparable to soils under Pennisetum purpureum cv. KK1 a commonly cultivated fodder in the region. Gartzia-Bengoetxea et al. (2009) also found a strong relationship between MWD and POM. Other previous studies using other sources of SOC have reported higher aggregate MWD with increased organic C in soils (Gulde et al., 2008;Min et al., 2003;Whalen et al., 2003). For example, Wortmann and Shapiro (2008) observed higher macroaggregates formation with composted manure application than unamended control. Similarly, Min et al. (2003) observed that livestock manure added at 32.7 Mg C ha −1 resulted in 30% higher aggregate stability than an unamended control.Small macro-aggregates fraction were found to be positively correlated with POM (r=0.9104, p=0.001), MBC (r=0.5474,p=0.01),and SOC (r=0.3654,p=0.05) and roots biomass (r=0.4977, p=0.01) but other fractions (>2000, 53-250 and <53 μm) were negatively correlated with the binding agents (Table 4). This agrees with other studies that have reported strong correlation of soil aggregate stability with POM in different soils (Six et al., 2002;Franchini et al., 2007) and due to the sensitivity of this parameter, POM has been used in previous studies as an indicator of changes caused by soil and crop management (Leifeld, et al., 2005;Franchini, et al., 2007). Recent work elsewhere has also shown strong positive links between roots biomass and aggregation suggesting that changes in roots biomass alters the structure of soil food webs, changing below ground C cycling and the mean residence time of different SOC pools (Reid et al., 2012). It is generally understood that formation of larger aggregates is enhanced by fine roots and fungal hyphae, while micro-aggregates are stabilized by long-chained organic compounds (e.g., polysaccharides) and fungal hyphae. In our study, correlations of roots biomass with MWD and the 250-2000 μm size fraction were significant and positive (Table 4) which supports the hypothesis that roots act as temporary binding agents which aid in stabilizing larger aggregates (Tisdall and Oades 1982). Larger size fractions (>2000 μm), micro-aggregates (53-250 μm) and the silt+ clay (<53 μm) fractions were negatively correlated with roots biomass. According to hierarchical theory of soil aggregation, binding of micro-aggregates into macro-aggregates occurs through the entanglement by roots and fungal hyphae, particularly vascular arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM) hyphae (Tisdall and Oades 1982;Bearden, 2001). The production of mucigel, rhizo-deposition, increases of poly-cations in the rhizosphere, and soil water extraction by plant roots have been implicated in the formation of soil aggregates (Perfect et al., 1990). Roots and hyphal growth stimulate microbial activity and simultaneously promote the formation of macro-aggregates (Denef, et al., 2007). Aggregates up to <1000 μm are predominantly assembled by fungal hyphae, mechanically through entanglement of soil particles and chemically with glue-like metabolites (Bearden 2001). Pohl et al. (2009) found a positive and significant correlation between roots length density and soil aggregate stability. Similarly, Reid et al. (2012) have reported strong positive links between roots biomass and the abundance of nematodes and several taxa of mesofauna, suggesting that changes in roots biomass alters the structure of soil food webs, changing belowground C cycling and the mean residence time of different SOC pools.The direct influence of roots as the primary C source to soil and particularly to POM is reflected in the significance influence (50.3% relative importance) of roots biomass to changes in POM (Table 4). Likewise, roots biomass was positively correlated to changes in both MBC (68.3% relative importance) and small micro-aggregates (49.8% relative importance). The greater below ground roots biomass of the Brachiaria grasses likely increased microbial activity, stabilizing aggregates through increases in microbially-derived soil binding agents leading to increases in physically protected POM (O'Brien and Jastrow, 2013;Zhang et al., 2013;Zhang et al., 2014). In other studies on soil aggregate stability in agricultural systems, Milne and Haynes (2004), Pohl et al. (2012), Hurisso et al. (2013 andO'Brien andJastrow (2013) found highest percentages of large aggregates in systems with permanent pasture. The authors showed that the activity of the grass roots system, coupled with the absence of soil disturbance, effectively contribute to the formation of stable macro-aggregates. The authors also reported the importance of relations between the MWD and the organic C pools, confirming the statement of Christensen (2001) that, aside from the interactions between minerals, the interaction of MWD with SOC strongly affects the size of water stable aggregates. Soils with higher water stable aggregates are likely to have greater resistance to soil degradation and erosion.Aggregate stability in terms of MWD differed among the Brachiaria grasses and was highest in soils under Mulato II hybrid and lowest under cv. MG4. This was attributed to the presence of higher POM and MBC in Mulato II hybrid cultivated soils. While we found that SOC did not vary among Brachiaria grasses over the short duration of the study, changes in below ground C cycling were apparent through effect on aggregate formation and higher POM and MBC in Brachiaria cultivated soils. By significantly improving soil aggregation and associated C content, the potential of Brachiaria grasses for enhancing C storage was noted. A large part of the world's grasslands is under pressure to produce more livestock by grazing more intensively, particularly in Africa's rangelands, which are vulnerable to climate change and are expected to supply most of the beef and milk requirements in Africa (Reid et al., 2004). Previous research has documented that improved pasture management can lead to greater forage production, more efficient use of land resources and rehabilitation of degraded lands (Oldeman, 1994). Implementing grassland management practices that increase carbon uptake by increasing productivity or reducing carbon losses can lead to net accumulation of carbon in grassland soils sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide (Lal, 2009).Soil organic matter (SOM) a key regulator of ecosystem processes plays an important role in soil fertility and is critical factor for the reduction of soil erosion through aggregate stabilization (Gichangi, et al., 2016). In addition, the preservation of SOM in soil mitigates greenhouse gas emissions (CO2) into the atmosphere (Cole et al., 1996;Pan et al., 2006). Atmospheric carbon can be sequestered in long-lived carbon pools of plant biomass both above and below ground or recalcitrant organic carbon in soils. Apart from offsetting CO2 emissions and global warming, sequestration of carbon in soils also helps to improve soil quality by improving many physical, chemical and biological properties of soils such as infiltration rate, aeration, bulk density, nutrient availability, cation exchange capacity, buffer capacity, etc. Practices that sequester carbon in grasslands also tend to enhance resilience, and are thus likely to enhance longer-term adaptation to changing climates more especially in the semi-arid environments where soils are inherently low in organic carbon content. Therefore, practices that sequester carbon should be promoted to provide near-term dividends in greater forage production for enhanced producer income and better environmental protection.Perennial grasses hold promise for increasing belowground C storage, sequestering C in extensive roots structures (Norby and Jackson, 2000;Fornara and Tilman 2008;Dohleman et al., 2012) and accumulating SOC at rates averaging 40-100 g C m -2 y -1 (Chevallier et al., 2000;Anderson-Teixeira et al., 2009). Indeed, some pastures have higher soil C stocks than forests (Cole et al., 1996;Neill et al., 1996). Scharpenseel and Becker-Heidmann (1997) for example reported that the mean residence time of C derived from pasture was longer than for C derived from forest in an Australian vertisols. Roots are the major C source in soil (Matamala 2008;Frank et al., 2004 Fornara andTilman 2008), and can also stimulate SOM mineralization (Ladd et al., 1994). The C sequestration rates vary widely for tropical zones (0.03 to 1.7 Mg ha -1 yr -1 ) and could be increased knowing the potential of biomass production of those agroecozones (Bayer et al., 2006;Corbeels et al., 2006;Cerri et al., 2007).Brachiaria grasses are endaphytic and have a great ability sequester and accumulate large amounts of SOC through their large and extensive shoots and roots biomass and survive in dry areas of low soil fertility (Clapperton et al., Fisher et al., 2007;Peters et al., 2012). This makes Brachiaria grasses a better option for livestock feed production and soil improvement. The grass is widely planted in the tropics of South America to sustain livestock production (Miles et al., 2004). About 55% of the total area of pastures is composed by grasses of the genus Brachiaria.Brazil for example, has around 172 million hectares of grasslands that support a cattle herd of approximately 170 million heads. The objective of this study was therefore to quantify the amounts of plant shoots and roots biomass resulting from 2 years cultivation of Brachiaria grasses in the semi-arid region of Kenya. We tested the hypothesis that Brachiaria grasses have higher shoots biomass and allocate more C to roots resulting in greater belowground biomass particularly when N and P fertilizers are applied compared to commonly cultivate local grasses.The Soil samples were collected in November 2013 before establishing the experiment at depths of 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-60 cm, and 60-100 cm using an auger for analysis at the testing sites. Plant litter on the soil surface was removed before collecting the soil samples. A composite soil sample, consisting of 12 cores, was collected in a grid pattern from within the 25 × 10 m blocks. Samples from each block were air-dried, visible plant roots removed, and the samples gently crushed to pass through a 2-mm sieve. The fractions sample <2 mm were used for subsequent chemical and physical analyses. Total soil N, available P (Mehlick III), exchangeable K, Ca, and Mg were estimated following standard methods as described by Okalebo et al. (2002). Cations Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , and K + were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry and soil P was measured as described by Murphy and Riley (1962).Soil texture was determined by the hydrometer method. Soil pH was measured in water (soil: water ratio of 1: 2.5) using a pH meter and reference calomel electrode (Model pH 330 SET-1, 82362) after the suspensions were shaken for 30 minutes and allowed to stand for 1 hour. Organic carbon was determined by the modified Walkley and Black procedure (Nelson and Sommers 1982). Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was based on the sum of exchangeable Ca, Mg, K, H + Al after extraction with ammonium acetate. Soil bulk density was determined according to Blake and Hartge (1986). Soils were vertically sampled using stainless steel rings (diameter 10 cm) at soil depths of: 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-60 cm, and 60-100 cm, resulting in undisturbed soil samples for bulk density determination. Soil samples were dried at 65ºC to a constant weight to allow soil bulk density calculation. All determinations were made in triplicate and expressed on a dry weight basis.The soil characteristics are shown in Table 1. Mean surface (0-15cm) soil pH was moderately acidic and was 5.8 and 5.3 in Katumani and Ithookwe, respectively. The soil pH in Ithookwe was slightly below the range (pH 5.5-7.0) for good nutrient availability without toxicity problems (Landon, 1984). Organic carbon content was low in both sites and varied from 0.49 -1.16% with depth for the Katumani and 0.52 -0.83% for the Ithookwe (Table 1). Similarly nitrogen, phosphorus and zinc were low in both sites. Potassium levels were adequate at Katumani site but were generally low in soil samples collected from Ithookwe. According to Foster (1971), critical values for soil pH, organic matter, total N, P and K are 5.5, 3.0%, 0.18%, 5 mg kg -1 and 13.3 cmolkg -1 respectively. Calcium and iron levels were adequate in both sites (Table 1).Results of the physical soil analysis of samples collected from the test sites at 0-15 cm indicated that the soils were sandy clay loam in Ithookwe and sandy clay in Katumani (Table 2). Cation exchange capacity ranged from 16.1 to 18.6me% and 20.2 to 27.8me% in Ithookwe and Katumani, respectively and tended to increase with depth. This would be expected as the clay content also increased with depth resulting to increased number of exchange sites. Bulk density ranged from 1.32 to 1.49 g/cm 3 and for both sites was greater than the ideal range of 1.1 -1.3 g cm -3 for non-restricted plant roots growth (Landon, 1991). According to Landon (1991), soil bulk density exceeding 1.3 g cm -3 for clay soils could negatively interfere with soil aeration through reduced air-filled pore space. Silt and clay comprised over 50 % of the soil in both sites (Table 2). during the short rains. All the plots were kept weed free throughout the experimental period by hand weeding. The grasses were first harvested 16 weeks after establishment and later, harvesting was done on an 8 weeks interval during the wet seasons.Data for shoots biomass was collected eight times on an 8 weeks interval after plants were well established. The establishment period was considered as 16 weeks after seedling emergence.Harvesting of plant shoots was carried out from 2 m x 2 m net plots at a cutting height of 5 cm above ground. Samples of fresh shoots biomass were recorded, and approximately 500g subsamples were dried at 65°C to constant weight in forced-air drier for determination of dry matter. Roots were sampled using the soil-core method (Bohm, 1979). In each plot, four soil cores were randomly taken with a 6.5 cm diameter stainless steel auger to a depth of 0-15 and 15-30 cm from the inter-row and intra-row positions and composited into one sample per plot for each depth. The sampling was carried out at least 1m apart from the edge of the plot to avoid edge effects. Sampling was conducted at 24 and 48 weeks of plants establishment. The roots from each soil layer were washed separately by hand with a 2.8 mm and a 2 mm soil sieve under running tap water. Root samples integrating both living and dead roots were then dried at 65°C to constant weight and roots dry weights were recorded. Total N and P in the plant samples were measured after digestion in a 1.2:1 H2SO4: H2O2 mixture at 360 o C after which total N and P were measured colorimetrically (Anderson and Ingram, 1993).Microbial biomass C was determined on field moist soil (18-23% by weight) taken from a depth 10 cm in the rhizosphere by the chloroform fumigation-extraction technique as described in Brookes et al. (1984Brookes et al. ( , 1985) ) and Gichangi et al. (2016). Briefly, 10 g dry weight equivalent of soil was fumigated with ethanol-free chloroform in a glass desiccator; and another 10g was incubated without fumigation at the same moisture content, time period and temperature for 24 h at 25°C. Both sets were extracted with 0.5 M K2SO4 and C in the extracts determined using the standard method as described by Okalebo et al. (2002). The Soil microbial biomass carbon was then calculated as the difference between the fumigated and un-fumigated samples and corrected for incomplete recovery using a conversion factor of 0.45 for C (Wu et al., 1990). All determinations were made in triplicate and expressed on a dry weight basis.Treatment effects on shoots and roots biomass were tested using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) as a split-plot with fertilizers N and P as the main factor and grass type as the subplot factor using GENSTAT statistical software (GENSTAT Release 4.24DE, 2005). Differences at p 0.05 were considered significant and means separation was done using Fischer's protected test (LSD). Regression analyses and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were used to find models best describing the relationships between shoots and roots biomass with other soil and plant properties.The shoots biomass differed significantly (p ≤0.05) among grass cultivars and across experimental sites. The shoots biomass of the Brachiaria cultivars ranged from 3.0 to 11.3 t ha -1 and 5.5 to 8.3 t ha -1 at Ithookwe and Katumani, respectively in year 1 with the highest shoots biomass recorded from cv. Piata at Ithookwe and cv. MG4 at the Katumani (Figure 1a). Similar trends were recorded in year 2 growth, but the shoots biomass was much lower at Katumani (Figure 1b) than in year 1 growth (Figure 1a). However the yields were significantly lower than those recorded from locally cultivated Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Kakamega 1) for both periods. Generally, higher shoots biomass was recorded from the Ithookwe site than that recorded from the Katumani site (Figure 1) indicating that the Brachiaria cultivars are more suited to that site. The site has a higher annual rainfall with a long term mean of 1010 mm compared to 717 mm received at Katumani. There was a strong positive relationship between shoots biomass recorded with N and P uptake (Figure 2). Higher shoots biomass resulted to higher N and P uptake indicating better utilization of the fertilizer applied. Bonfim and Monteiro (2006) and Batista and Monteiro (2008) have previously reported that the combined application of nitrogen with phosphorus was more effective in maximizing the leaf area and the production of higher dry matter of grasses. Brachiaria cultivars; Marandu, Xaraes, Basilisk and Piata had higher roots biomass than the local checks (Napier and Rhodes grass) indicating greater potential for the Brachiaria grasses to sequester more carbon in the soil. A vigorous roots system increases plant growth rate, tolerance to water deficit, and ability to compete for soil nutrients and consequently, leads to an increase in pasture productivity. These results are in agreement with observations made by Peters et al., 2012 that Brachiaria grasses have greater ability to sequester and accumulate large amounts of organic carbon through their large roots biomass. Generally roots biomass was significantly higher from samples collected from Ithookwe than those obtained from Katumani (Figure 3). Grass type by sampling depth interaction was highly significant (P<0.001) for roots biomass with the highest roots concentration recorded in the upper (0 -15 cm) soil layer regardless of the grass type and sampling period (Figure 4). There was approximately 79% of dry roots matter in the 0 -15 cm soil layer and as expected, roots biomass, increased with age (Figure 4b). Among the Brachiaria cultivars, cv. Mulato II hybrid had the lowest amount of roots; 242.3 g m -2 and 409.9 g m -2 in the 0-15 cm depth 24 and 48 weeks after plants had established, respectively. The trend was similar in the 15 -30 cm depth (Figure 4). Grassland management that enhance production (through sowing improved species, irrigation or fertilization), minimizing the negative impacts of grazing or rehabilitating degraded lands can each lead to carbon sequestration (Follett, et al., 2001;Conant et al., 2001). In this study fertilizer addition significantly (p<0.001) increased roots dry matter of all grass types except cvs. Basilisk, MG4 and Mulato II 24 weeks after plants had established (Figure 5a). However, the fertilizer effects were significant in all Brachiaria cultivars at 48 weeks (Figure 5b). The cultivar x fertilizer treatments interaction was also significant for roots biomass. This confirmed that low nutrient availability, especially phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) supply are a major limitation to forage production in infertile soils of the region. Our results are in agreement to those of Conant et al. (2001) who reported that intensively managed and fertilized grassland had higher roots biomass than less managed grasslands. As forage production increases with fertilizer application, an ancillary benefit may lie in increased sequestration of atmospheric carbon. Indeed, Gifford et al. (1992) noted that improved pasture management is an important consideration when computing a national carbon budget. The synthesis by Smith et al. (2008) suggests that improvement of soil fertility could lead to C sequestration of between 0.42 and 0.76 t C ha -1 yr -1 depending on the region. Similar observations were also made by Follett et al. (2001) who reported that grassland management to enhance production through sowing improved species, irrigation and fertilization can each lead to carbon sequestration. The increased carbon allocation to the roots by the Brachiaria grasses resulted in net belowground sequestration of carbon as indicated by the positive correlation between roots biomass with microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and soil organic carbon (SOC) (Table 3) even though the changes in SOC were very small and not significant among the Brachiaria grasses. The results of this study indicate that the introduction of Brachiaria grasses in the semi-arid tropics of Kenya and in other similar environments would increase soil carbon stocks through their higher shoots and roots biomass that can aid in offsetting the adverse effect of climate change and have greater economic returns.A major biotic constraint to dairy production in Kenya is inadequate and low quality feed resources to meet year-round nutrient requirements for lactating cows (Reynolds et al., 1993). Natural pastures are the main feed resource mainly under free-grazing system in coastal lowlands (Muinga et al., 1998;Njarui et al., 2016). Milk production for local and exotic/crossbred cattle is low, ranging from 1.0 to 6.4 kg day −1 respectively (Ramadhan et al., 2008). Over several decades, Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.), was promoted for improving fodder availability (Mureithi et al., 1998). The grass which is one of the highest yielding tropical grasses, is versatile and grows under a wide range of conditions and systems. It is a valuable forage notably in cut-and-carry systems (FAO, 2015). Increased milk production has been recorded where lactating dairy cattle were fed Napier grass cv. Bana supplemented with forage legumes (Muinga et al., 1992;Juma et al., 2006). Despite past efforts to promote fodder technologies for dairy feeding in Kenya, Napier grass contributes about 10% of feed in coastal Kenya, 35-45% in North western highlands and about 50% in the central highlands (Njarui et al., 2016). In some parts of Kenya, Napier grass is challenged by the stunting disease and head smut (Kabirizi et. al., 2016) , 2015). Brachiaria brizantha yield in Tanzania increased from 6 to 26.5 t/ha on nitrogen (896 kg/ha/year) application (Urio et al., 1988). Brachiaria grasses are among the most nutritious forages in the humid tropics. For example, B. brizantha contains about 10% (range: 5 to 16%) crude protein (CP) in dry matter, 66% neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and 58% in vivo organic matter digestibility (Heuzé at al., 2016). In Cameroon during the dry season, a decrease in CP from 15.6 to 5.4% and an increase in NDF and acid detergent fibre (ADF) from 34.2 to 48.6% to 70.5 to 76% respectively for B. ruziziensis, were recorded compared to the wet season (Pamo et al., 2007).Hardly any animal performance studies involving Brachiaria have been reported within the East African region. The current studies were therefore designed to evaluate Brachiaria grasses as basal feed for lactating cows, on-farm in mid-altitude eastern region and under controlled conditions on-station in coastal lowlands of Kenya. The potential of using Brachiaria grasses in dairy feeding as alternatives to Napier grass and other locally available feeds is reported.The study was carried out in Kangundo sub-County in mid-altitude eastern region of Kenya. Farmers in this sub-County (Machakos County) were introduced to Brachiaria in an earlier study to evaluate the performance of various cultivars. Typically the farmers have smallholdings where they practice mixed crop-livestock farming. They keep different species of livestock and dairy farming is an important livelihood strategy. About 69% of the farmers keep dairy cattle and the average herd size is 3.1±2.1 animals (Njarui et al., 2016).A meeting was held on 5 May 2015 where 60 farmers attended. They were given an overview of livestock feeding which included the different types of feeds which can be used as sources of basal diet, protein and energy. The session was interactive and farmers shared information freely. The lactation curve was highlighted to show early lactation where milk increased to a peak at about 2-3 months after calving (Figure 1).Cows after peak lactation when milk yield decreases, were selected for the feeding trial because an increase in milk yield during this period could be attributed to feed quality. Eighteen (18) farmers who indicated that they had planted more than 0.1 ha of any Brachiaria cultivar were included in the study. Out of the 18 farmers who registered for the feeding trial, only data from 12 farms were analysed. The other farmers did not have adequate amount of Brachiaria forage to cover the feeding period as indicated in the meeting. Farmers used four Brachiaria grass cultivars in the trial depending on what they had. These included: cultivars Piata, Xaraes, MG4 and Basilisk.Both the farmers, researchers and extension staff jointly participated in data collection. At the commencement of the study, milk yield of cows fed on local feeds was recorded for three consecutive days. This was followed by feeding the cows on Brachiaria grass for seven days. Milk yield for the last three days was compared with the initial three days milk yield for the period when cows were fed on locally available feeds. A total of 12 lactating dairy cows in mid lactation (3 and 6 months) were used for milk yield analysis.The mean milk yield per farm was calculated for the first three (3) days when the cows were fed on local feeds and for the last three (3) days when cows were fed on Brachiaria grass. The means were subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using the statistical software Genstat 15 (VSN International, 2013) using the following model:Yij=µ + Ti +Fj + εij,Where: Yij=Observed milk yield for i th feed in j th farm µ=Overall mean Ti=Effect of i th feed (i=1, 2 for local feed or Brachiaria grass) Fj=Effect of j th farm (replicate), (j=1 to 12) εij=Random errorThe study was carried out at KALRO Mtwapa, at an altitude of 15 m above sea level, latitude 3 o 56′S, longitude 39 o 44′E, in the coastal lowlands agro-ecological zone 3 (CL3). The site is characterized by light sandy soils and a mean annual rainfall of 1200 mm. The relative humidity ranges from 65 -95% and the mean annual temperatures range from 24 to 29°C (Jaetzold et al., 2006). Napier grass established in gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) alleys and pure plots of Brachiaria grasses (B. hybrid cv. Mulato II, B. brizantha cvs. Piata, Xaraes) were established in November 2014 at the recommended spacing of 50 cm between the rows. Normal cultural practices were carried out to optimize yield. The grasses were harvested daily and chopped with a motorized chaff cutter. Gliricidia was harvested and wilted a day before feeding the leaves and stems less than 5 mm diameter were fed to the cows.Sixteen lactating ( 16) Jersey cows with pre-experiment milk yield ranging from 4 to 5 kg/day and weighing 257±38 kg were used in the experiment. The cows were divided into four groups balanced for milk yield and live weight at the start of the experiment. The groups were allocated to four treatments (cvs. Mulato II, Piata, Xaraes and Napier grass cv. Bana), in a completely randomized design. Each cow was fed the recommended supplement of 8 kg fresh gliricidia and 3 kg maize bran in two equal amounts daily at milking. They were also allowed 60 g of a dairy mineral mix per cow daily and clean cool water was provided ad libitum. Refusals were removed and weighed every morning after which fresh feed was added. Data was collected on feed intake and milk yield. The cows were housed in individual feeding stalls and allowed a three weeks acclimatization period on the treatment diets. Data collection commenced on 7 th September, 2015 for 10 weeks. Composite samples of each feed (maize bran, gliricidia, grasses) taken at three stages (onset, mid and end of the experiment) were analysed.Feed samples were analysed for Ash, Nitrogen, Phosphorous (P) and Calcium (Ca) The total P and Ca were measured according to methods described by Okalebo et al. (2002). Ash was determined by heating the samples at 600 o C for 2 hours in a muffle furnace. Crude protein (CP) was estimated from Nitrogen x 6.5. Neutral detergent fibre (NDF), Acid detergent fibre (ADF), Acid detergent lignin (ADL) and dry matter digestibility (DMD) and organic matter (OMD) digestibility were determined through the method of Goering and Van Soest (1970). The analyses were carried out at KALRO Muguga (Food Crops Research Institute).Analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the General Linear Model was carried out using the following model: Yij = µ+ Gi + εij,Where: Yij =The jth observation on the ith treatment; µ = Overall mean; Gi= the effect of the ith grass treatment; εij= Random error.Means were separated using the least significant difference (LSD) at P=0.05 (SAS, 2003)Two distinct groups of lactating dairy cows were observed, the relatively high and low yielding (Figure 2). On average milk production increased from 4 to 4.6 litres/cow per day for low yielding animals, representing a 15% increase and 9 to12.6 litres/cow per day for the relatively higher yielding dairy cattle representing a 40% increase. This is an indication that Brachiaria is superior to the locally available feeds used by the farmers in the area during the study period. Therefore farmers should be encouraged to increase the acreage under Brachiaria which has potential to increase milk production. Gliricidia had the highest CP (24.4%) and lowest NDF (34.9%) which was different (P<0.05) from the grasses. Its dry matter and organic matter digestibility was however similar (P>0.05) to that of Napier grass, Mulato II and Piata and higher (P<0.05) than Xaraes (Table 1). Xaraes had the lowest CP and digestibility and the highest NDF but these values were similar (P>0.05) to those recorded for Napier grass, Mulato II and Piata. The grasses had similar ADF, ADL, Ca and P. The CP and OMD values of the Brachiaria cultivars in this study were lower than those reported by Nguku (2015) in Katumani. However, the CP and OMD values had a similar trend to those reported in a different study at Mtwapa by Ondiko et al. (2016). Their CP was 6.9, 5.8, 5.4 and 4.9% for Napier grass, Mulato II, Piata and Xaraes which was similar to values reported in the current study (Table 1). The cows ate all the supplement (8 kg fresh gliricidia and 3 kg maize bran) equivalent to 2.2 kg DM gliricidia and 2.7 kg DM maize bran. The daily basal grass diet DM intake was similar (P<0.05) for cows fed on Bana grass (5.7 kg) and those fed Piata (5.8 kg) and was different (P<0.05) from that of cows fed Mulato II (6.3 kg) or Xaraes (6.4 kg) (Table 2). Mean daily milk production for all the cows was low (4.3 kg cow -1 ) probably as a result of the late stage of lactation at the start of the experiment. Cows fed Piata (4.7kg) and Bana (4.6kg) had the highest milk yield which was not different (P > 0.05). However cows fed on Mulato II (4.4kg) and Xaraes (3.6kg) produced less (P<0.05) milk daily compared to those fed on Piata and Napier grass (Table 2). Cows fed on Xaraes had the highest DM intake and the lowest milk yield. The DM intake was equivalent to 2.5, 2.7, 2.3 and 2.1 kg digestible organic matter for cows fed on Bana, Mulato II, Piata and Xaraes respectively. Table 2 shows the calculated total DOM intake which was positively related to milk yield; thus Xaraes had the lowest DOM intake and lowest milk yield. It was noted from Figure 3 that, although the groups were balanced for milk yield at the start of the experiment, cows fed on Xaraes had the lowest milk yield (4.2 kg) by the start of the experimental period (at 3 weeks) compared to the other treatments (Piata 5.0, Bana 4.6, and Mulato 4.8 kg). From the current study, the crude protein, NDF and digestibility (except for Xaraes) of the Brachiaria cultivars were similar to that of Bana. Milk yield from cows fed Piata was comparable to that of cows fed Bana. Brachiaria therefore has the potential to replace Bana in dairy feeding especially in areas where it is threatened by head smut and stunting disease.Compared to the local feeds in Kangundo sub County, Brachiaria increased milk by 15-40%.Therefore farmers should be encouraged to grow more Brachiaria for increased milk production. There is however need to repeat the on station experiment to verify the results with more Brachiaria cultivars under controlled conditions where grasses are harvested at a similar stage of growth. Arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) cover 80% of Kenya's landmass (Mganga et al., 2010). These areas are characterized by low rainfall, high temperatures, poor quality feed resources, and high incidences of livestock diseases (Kahi et al., 2006). The ASALs support 60% of the livestock population and the largest proportion of wildlife (Ngugi and Nyariki, 2003). According to Mbogoh and Shaabani (1999) agro-pastoralism and pastoralism are the main economic activities in ASALs from which majority of the people attain their livelihoods. This is mostly based on cattle (the small East African zebu -SEAZ and Boran), goats, sheep and camels, and thus constitutes a major source of Kenya's meat (Herlocker, 1999).According to Njarui et al. (2011), the productivity of livestock in Kenya is strongly linked to feed availability. The reason for this is that; feed is the major input factor in livestock production systems and account for between 60 -70% of the production cost. The authors reported that, the productivity of ruminants is considered low due to inadequate and poor quality feeds. There is a feed resource deficit for about 4 -6 months in a year across many regions in Kenya particularly during the dry season when there is limited pasture growth. Livestock is considered one of the key assets for rural households in most parts of the world and it is a primary livelihood resource for most rural communities. According to FAO (2012), about 752 million of the world's poor keep livestock mainly to; generate cash income, produce food for subsistence use, manage risks and to build up assets for security purposes. Another limitation of livestock production is that there is lack of suitable fodder crops that can produce green forage throughout the year (Leeuw et al., 1992). This situation becomes even worse in the areas that are constrained by low rainfall.Most small ruminants in the ASALs suffer from nutritional stress (Bruinsma, 2003). Most of the grasses have low crude protein (CP) falling below 7% minimum level that is required for optimum microbial growth (Wambui et al., 2006). When this occurs, it prompts supplementation, which is not always possible for resource poor farmers (Gitunu et al., 2003).There is a need, therefore, for pasture species that can improve the quality of the natural pastures and significantly increase dry matter production to enhance livestock productivity. One of these pastures has been found to be Brachiaria (Machogu, 2013). Lascano andEuclides (1996) andBrighenti et al. (2008) reported that apart from the good adaptability, tolerance and resistance of Brachiaria species, the grasses have high forage quality and high dry matter production making them capable of meeting the nutritional requirements of animals especially during the dry season.Goats are found in many parts of Kenya and are an important source of income to many smallholder farmers. They are preferred to cattle as they can be converted to cash easily. They also provide a higher offtake compared to cattle because of their shorter generation interval and higher prolificacy (Ahuya and Okeyo, 2006). Galla goats also known as Somali or Boran goats are indigenous to the arid and semi-arid regions of northern Kenya and are kept mainly for meat (Ahuya and Akeyo, 2006). The full potential of the ASALs for livestock production can be exploited by expanding the forage resource base by introducing climate smart forage species to boost nutrient quality and quantity hence supplying the nutritive requirements of livestock. Studies on climate smart Brachiaria grass species developed elsewhere have shown that they could be the key to improvement of livestock production and also serve to boost composition and nutritive values of local Brachiaria cultivars. However, there are hardly any studies on goat feeding on Brachiaria grasses. The study was therefore carried out to determine its suitability on goat performance. The objective was to evaluate the growth of Galla goats fed selected Brachiaria grass cultivars.The feeding trial was conducted at the Sheep and Goat Multiplication Centre at Matuga (4 o 9'6'S; 39 o 32'40'E), in Kwale County, Kenya. The Centre is located at 60 m asl in coastal lowlands 3 (CL3) agro-ecological zone, also referred to as the coconut-cassava zone (Jaetzold et al., 2006).The average annual rainfall is 1100 mm while the relative humidity ranges from 70 -80% and an average temperature from 22 -30 o C.Sixteen Galla goat bucklings aged between 6-12 months and weighing 10-24 kg were selected from Centre herd. They were divided into four groups of four animals which were balanced for age and weight and randomly assigned to four dietary treatments. The goats were kept in well ventilated individual pens. Dry grass was used for bedding. Both the feeding and sleeping areas were disinfected before the goats were brought in. During the adjustment period, animals were dewormed against endo-parasites and sprayed weekly against ecto-parasites. The pens were cleaned every morning and beddings changed weekly.The Brachiaria cultivars used for feeding were Brachiaria brizantha cvs. Piata and MG4 and B. hybrid cv. Mulato II. Rhodes grass was used as the control. The cvs. Piata, MG4 and Rhodes grass were grown at KALRO-Katumani in the semi-arid region of eastern Kenya while Mulato II was grown at KALRO-Mtwapa in the coastal lowlands. The recommended agronomic practices were followed in order to provide good quality forage for feeding. During the harvesting, the grasses were cut at 5 cm above ground and allowed to dry, baled into hay and transported to Matuga.During the feeding, all the animals were supplemented with a 100g/day of maize germ that was purchased from a commercial maize miller to last for the whole experiment. The supplement was given before the basal diets were offered at 7.00 hrs. Water and a mineral supplement were provided ad libitum. The hay made up of stem and leaves were chopped using a motorized chaff cutter to approximately 5 cm length and mixed thoroughly to prevent selection. The feeds were offered for a 14 days adaptation period and 12 weeks experimental period from mid-April to July 2016. The grass basal diet was offered ad libitum by offering feed in the morning and adding during the day to ensure feed availability at all times. Any feed that was not consumed was removed and weighed the following day before fresh feed was added.A small amount of herbage was taken from each bale used for feeding and a composite sample of about 2 kg per treatment constituted for analysis. The samples were ground to pass through 1 mm screen. The samples were then analysed in duplicates for chemical composition at the Animal and Nutrition Laboratory at KALRO-Muguga. The CP was determined using the micro-Kjeldahl according to the method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2000). Neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), lignin, and digestibility were determined according to the procedure of Goering and Van Soest (1970). Ash was determined by heating the samples at 600 o C for 2 hours in a muffle furnace. Total P and Ca were determined according to the methods described by Okalebo et al. (2002).The nutritive quality composition (DM, CP, OM, Ash, NDF, ADF, ADL, Ca, P) and digestibility of feeds were analysed using the general linear model (GLM) procedures of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 2010). Values for feed intake and live weight gain were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a completely randomised design using GLM procedures of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 2010) based on the following model:Where Yij is the jth observation of the ith treatment; µ is overall mean; Ti is the effect of the feed of the ith grass treatment (1-4) and eij is the residual error. Means were separated by least significance difference (LSD) (Steel and Torrie, 1981).There were significance (P < 0.05) differences in the CP content, dry matter digestibility, ADF, ADL, ash, Ca and P content among the forages (Table 1). Piata had the highest CP content (12.6% of DM) while Mulato II had lowest (P<0.05). Similarly, MG4 and Piata were more digestible than Mulato II and Rhodes grass. All the Brachiaria cultivars had similar amount of Ca but were significantly (P<0.05) lower than that of Rhodes grass while P content was not different (P>0.05) among all the grasses.The goats ate all (100 g) the maize germ supplements offered. The average feed intake on weekly basis for the entire feeding period is shown in Figure 1. There was no difference (P > 0.05) in the basal feed intake in all the weeks among the goats. Generally the average daily feed intake increased over time and ranged from 513 -661 g/goat.Live weight increased marginally with goats fed on Piata and MG4 maintaining the highest weights during the entire period (Figure 2). Goats fed on Mulato II lost weight initially and gained from week 9. The average daily weight gain (ADWG) differed significantly (P<0.05) with bucklings fed on Piata (45.21g/day) and MG4 (41.28g/day) having the highest daily weight gain In this study, Piata and MG4 were found to be better sources of protein than Mulato II and Rhodes grass. They contained the minimum CP of 7.5% suggested as necessary for optimum rumen function and production by Van Soest (1994). Afzal and Ullah (2007) reported that crude protein (CP) and digestible dry matter are the most important components of a feed. Crude protein requirement for small ruminant maintenance is 9.6, 11.2 and 11.7% for pregnant ewes, does and kid finishing respectively (NRC, 2007). The CP content of Mulato II content was low compared with that reported by Nguku (2015) of 7-12.8% in a semi-arid region of Kenya, 15% in central Kenya (Nyambati et al. 2016) and 12-17% by Vendramini et al. (2011) in Florida, USA. The low CP of Mulato II was attributed to poor management of the grass at harvesting and baling. Further Mulato II was grown in the coastal lowlands and generally due to the high temperatures experienced in the region, the growth was fast and accumulated more fibre resulting to low CP and digestibility. On the contrary Piata, MG4 and Rhodes were grown in mid-altitude region where it is cooler resulting in slower growth.The DMD of Mulato II and Rhodes was lower than that reported by Ondiko et al. (2016) in coastal lowlands of Kenya. The digestibility of tropical grasses ranges between 50 and 65%, while that of temperate grasses is slightly higher and ranges between 65 and 80%. Coward-Lord et al. (1974) reported that the age of cutting forage crops has an influence on the o digestibility, and is a function of the chemical constituents of forages. These results agree with what Njarui et al. (2003) who reported that the proportion of potentially digestible components decline as the fibrous content increases.Bucklings fed on Piata and MG4 gained more weight on daily basis and had the highest total weight gain at the end of experiment. This weight gain was higher than that reported by Njarui et al. (2003) for Kenya Dual Purpose goats fed different forage legumes supplements and by Nyako et al. (2012) when fed on Pangola grass and supplemented with cotton seed cake. In another study by Wambui et al. (2006) on German Alpine crosses supplemented with Tithonia, Calliandra and Sesbania, the goats showed a high average daily weight gain of up to 82.7, 57.3 and 39.3 g/day, respectively. High weight gain for goats fed on Piata and MG4 is attributed to their high CP content, digestibility and low fibres. On the contrary bucklings fed Mulato II had the lowest gain due to low CP content.Piata and MG4 contributed to the highest growth of the Galla goats and were superior to Rhodes grass. Thus these grasses could replace Rhodes grass in the coastal lowlands as livestock feeds. Further research should be conducted on Mulato II taking into consideration its management to maintain high quality.Theme 5Seed Production and DiseasesThe Brachiaria grasses belong to the poacea family, are classified as C4 plants and the life cycle can be either annual or perennial. The genus Brachiaria includes about 100 species which are distributed in the tropical and subtropical regions of both eastern and western hemispheres but mostly in Africa (Renvoize et al., 1996). The most common and extensively cultivated Brachiaria species for pastures are; B. brizantha, B. ruziziensis, B. decumbens and B. mutica, but recently B. humidicola and B. platynota have also received increased attention (Ndikumana and de Leeuw, 1996). The genus Brachiaria originated from Africa but is now widely cultivated in sub-tropical and tropical regions of Australia and South America (Parsons, 1972). An estimated 99 million hectares are planted in Brazil (Jank et al., 2014) and about 300,000 hectares in Asia, the South Pacific and Australia (Stur et al., 1996). In the Pacific region, over 10,000 hectares of Brachiaria hybrid cv. Mulato II pastures were established in Vanuatu since 2007, where it is primarily used for beef cattle grazing (Pizzaro et al., 2013). In USA, nearly 200,000 hectares of Mulato II pastures had been established by 2005 for both dairy and beef cattle grazing (Esteban et al., 2013). In Kenya a few cultivars of Brachiaria grass have been introduced to over 4000 farmers (Njarui, per comm.) while in Rwanda Mulato II was introduced to smallholder farmers (Mutimura and Everson, 2012). Feeding Brachiaria grass to dairy cattle showed increased milk production by 15 to 40% in Kenya (Ghimire et al., 2015). However, limited seed availability is the major constraints to increasing area under cultivation.All Brachiaria species can be propagated both vegetatively and from seeds. Vegetative propagation is simple but impracticable except in very small-scale farming (Hopkinson et al., 1996) necessitating the need for extensive seed production. Developing an appropriate method for harvesting Brachiaria seeds is important for producing high quality seeds to be commercially available to farmers at a reasonable price. A number of studies have been conducted to determine the most suitable methods for harvesting Brachiaria seeds. The work of Hare et al. (2007) found out that high seed yields are obtained from multiple, non-destructive manual harvests, with seed heads tied into living sheaves and the seed knocked daily into seednet receptacles. Normally in Thailand, seed is ground swept while in Laos it is harvested by knocking the seeds from seedheads (Pizzaro et al., 2013). In Mexico and Brazil, all the seeds are ground-swept using machinery (Pizarro et al., 2010). The Brachiaria seed industry in Brazil has grown to meet the large internal demand and an expanding export market placing it in competition, in terms of monetary value with major cereal crops (Santos Filho, 1996). Thus, if Brachiaria grasses seeds are made available to smallholder farmers in Kenya, they could boost the forage resource base and propel the livestock industry. Additionally, farmers would benefit through increased incomes from seed trade enterprises and contribute to growth of Kenya economy. The work reported in this paper was conducted to assess the seed production potential and understand the phenological and seeding characteristics of the Brachiaria grasses in central highlands of Kenya.The study was carried out at the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO), Embu which is situated 3 km north of Embu town. The centre lies at latitude, 0 0 30'S and longitude 37 0 27'E, at an elevation of 1492 m asl. The average annual rainfall is 1252 mm, is bimodal with the long rains occurring from mid-March to September and average 650 mm. The short rains occurs from mid-October to February and average 450 mm. The mean annual temperature is 19.5 0 C, with mean maximum and minimum of 25 0 C and 14.1 0 C, respectively. The mean annual potential evaporation is 1422 mm while mean annual evapo-transpiration is 950 mm. The site lies in the transition of Upper Midlands (UM) 2 and UM 3 agro-ecological zones.The soils are mainly humic Nitisols (FAO-UNESCO, 1994) and are derived from basic volcanic rocks. They are deep, highly weathered with friable clay texture and moderate to high inherent fertility (Jaetzold et al., 2006).The experiment was set out in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Plot sizes were 5 m x 4 m with a 1 m path between plots and replications. The seeds were drilled in furrows at about 1.5 cm deep on a well prepared seedbed with an inter-row spacing of 0.5 m,All Brachiaria cultivars established successfully and attained good vegetative plot cover within the first month after seedling emergence and complete plot cover at 50% flowering. The height attained by the different Brachiaria cultivars was closely related to the time they took to flower. Those cultivars that took longer to flower were comparatively tall and vice versa for the others. However, the difference in plant height is genetically controlled but the plants also differed in growth habit. Llanero has a prostrate growth habit while the other Brachiaria had erect growth habit.The variation in the number of days to flowering and to seed maturity (hardening of the caryopsis) was large. Based on day to initiation of flowering and seed maturity, the grasses can be divided in two groups. Basilisk, Cayman, Cobra, Mulato II and MG4 are early maturing while Piata, Marandu, Llanero and Xaraes could be regarded as late maturing. This classification is similar to that reported by Kamidi et al. (2016;this proceedings) for some of cultivars grown in north western highland of Kenya. They grouped MG4, Basilisk and Cayman as early maturing together with Piata. In another study at Kitale in western Kenya, B. ruziziensis flowered 147 days after seedling emergence while regrowth headed as early as 21 days after cutting (Boonman, 1971). Generally, seeds production was low in all the Brachiaria cultivars and this has also been reported in Thailand (Esteban et al., 2013;Hare et al., 2007). Esteban et al. (2013) reported seeds yield of 150 kg ha -1 from Mulato II and Cayman. Earlier work by Hare et al. (2007) reported less than 200 kg/ha of seed from Mulato II hybrid in Mexico and attributed the low seed yields to pollen sterility and poor caryopsis maturation. The different quantity of seeds produced by the various Brachiaria cultivars is attributed to the difference in genetic characteristics and environmental conditions. Although most of the grasses flowered profusely, this was not reflected in seed production due to failure to form seeds. Nevertheless, most of the tillers of Marandu did not produce any inflorescence and this contributed to low seed yield. However, it is important to point out that seed harvesting coincided short rains 2014 and long rains 2015 seasons. This had a negative impact on the seed recovery as most of the seeds were washed down by rain water and it was not possible to recover it from the mud. Thus, seed yields realised from this experiment from all the Brachiaria does represent the actual quantities of seed produced.Although most of the Brachiaria grasses flowered profusely, there was poor seed formation and consequently seed yield was low. On the basis of seed production, Llanero was the most promising. The experiment was conducted in one year and thus further monitoring would be necessary to ascertain seed production for longer period. In view of the fact reasonable quantity of seeds was not harvest due to wet season, there is need to identify suitable time for planting so that seed maturity does not coincide with rainy season.Agriculture contributes about 25% of Kenya's gross domestic product (GDP) (KARI, 2009) with the dairy sector contributing 14% of the agricultural GDP (Kiptarus, 2005). Farmers in the north western highlands of Kenya practice mixed farming in which maize and dairy are the main enterprises even though there is a trend to shift to dairy farming because of high production costs and poor prices for maize crop. A major constraint to livestock production in the region is the acute feed shortages that occur during the dry seasons and limited availability of forages of high nutritional quality (Ndung'u-Magiroi et al., 2016). The commonly cultivated forage, Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana), has limited adaptation. Napier grass, the commonly cultivated fodder by dairy farmers in region is susceptible to smut and stunt threaten its survival and production (Orodho, 2006, Maass et al., 2015). With the decreasing land sizes due to subdivisions and the need to produce more feed to sustain the dairy industry in the region, there is need to introduce other grass species that are more productive and with higher nutritional value.Brachiaria grass, a native of east and central Africa was introduced to Latin America, Southeast Asia and Australia where it has revolutionized grassland farming and animal production (Ndikumana and de Leeuw, 1996). The implementation of the Swedish funded research programme \"Climate-smart Brachiaria grasses for improved livestock production in East Africa has led to high publicity of the importance of Brachiaria grasses which has created big interest and high demand for seed among farmers across Kenya (BecA, 2014). The programme aimed at increasing animal productivity through enhanced feed availability using climate smart Brachiaria grasses. Brachiaria grass can be established using either seed or vegetative material.Establishment by vegetative material is labour intensive and is more expensive than establishment by seed, which can easily be mechanized (Kandemir andSaygili, 2015, Maass et al., 2015). Many Brachiaria cultivars reproduce through apomixis (Araujo et al., 2007) which is seed formation without fertilization (Kandemir and Saygili, 2015). The seeds produce plants that are identical to the mother plants (Hare et al., 2007) thus enabling production of seeds that are true to type.Seed production potential can be linked to environmental factors (Monteiro et al., 2016), and in the humid lowland tropics, especially near the equator grass seed production can be a big challenge (Maass et al., 2015;Phaikaew et al., 1997). Many species which grow well in such areas often do not produce seed and those that do such as Brachiaria decumbens cv Basilisk, the seed yields are normally very low (Hare et al., 2015). Hare et al., (2015) observed that altitude and latitude influence flowering and seed setting in Brachiaria hybrids. In Brazil and Thailand for example successful Brachiaria seed production is done in latitudes 20 o -22 o S and at elevations of 700-1000 m above sea level and is in latitudes 19 o -20 o N at 700-1200 m asl, respectively. Currently there is no commercial Brachiaria seed production in Kenya and the imported seeds from South America are expensive. Therefore, there is need to identify suitable regions where the seed can be produced locally to meet anticipated demand. The objective of the study was to evaluate the seed production potential of Brachiaria cultivars in north western highlands of Kenya.The study was conducted at Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) Kitale farm (1° 0′ 6.6´´N and 34° 59´ 10´´E), at 1890 m asl. The mean annual rainfall is 1140 mm and is unimodal occurring from March to November with peaks in May and August and with a distinct dry spell from December to March. The region experiences annual mean minimum and maximum temperatures of 12° C and 25° C, respectively (Jaetzold et al., 2012). The dominant soils are humic Acrisols (Jones et al., 2013) and are deficient in nitrogen and phosphorus.seeds. These results are in agreement with observations made by Boonman (1973) that early maturing cultivars of some tropical grasses produce more seed than the late maturing ones.The relationship between seed yield and days to 50% flowering There was a positive and significant relationship between seed yield and the number of tillers per plant (Figure 3a) and number of inflorescence per plant (Figure 3b). Cultivars MG4, Basilisk and Cayman, had higher (P < 0.01) number of tillers and inflorescence per plant than Piata, Cobra and Xaraes and tended to produce more seed. These results confirm earlier findings by Hare et al. (2015) who observed very few inflorescences in Xaraes and corresponding low seed production. Our results contradict the findings by Monteiro et al. (2016) who found no direct relationship between the number of vegetative tillers and seed yield in some tropical grasses.Although the seed yields obtained in this study were low, they are comparable to those reported elsewhere. For example, Gobius et al. (200I) reported yields ranging from 81 to 123 kg ha -1 for cv. Basilisk compared to 97 kg ha -1 obtained in this study. Pizarro et al. (2013) obtained seed yields of 150 kg ha -1 for Cayman which was lower than 192 kg ha -1 recorded in this study though the yields are lower than those recommended (600 -700 kg ha -1 ) for viable commercial production with competitive prices (Hare et al., 2015). Phaikaew et al. (1997) reported that seed production in the humid lowland tropics near the equator was difficult and this would explain the low yields obtained in this study where the site lies at 1 o N and 1890 m above sea level. Hare et al. (2015) found that in Brazil, successful Brachiaria seed production was possible in latitudes 20 o -22 o S at elevations of 700-1000m above sea level, while in Thailand production of seed is done in areas between latitudes 19 o -22 o N and at elevations between 700 to1200 m above sea level. Similarly, Andrade (2001) found latitudes 15 o -22 o S, with annual rainfall not exceeding 1500mm with a distinct dry spell during harvesting to be suitable for Brachiaria seed production. The seeds produced in this study failed to germinate when tested. Several factors may have contributed to the failure of the seed to germinate. Some of the seed may have failed to form caryopsis due to environmental factors as has also been reported by Araujo et al. (2007) and Hare et al. (2007), abscission that is quite common in Brachiaria (Hare et al., 2015). The seedsBrachiaria is one of the most important forage grass in the tropics and sub tropics (Keller-Grein et al., 1996). Among 100 documented species: B. brizantha, B. decumbens, B. humidicola and B. ruziziensis and hybrids (Mulato, Mulato II and Cayman) are of significant importance as they have been improved for quality, quantity and persistence and grown in large acreages across the world (Miles et al., 2004;Rao et al., 2011). The production of Napier grass, the most important forage grass in Kenya and other East African countries has been threatened by smut and stunt diseases urging the need for alternative forage species to fulfill demand of ever increasing livestock populations in the region. High biomass production potential, highly nutritive herbage, adaptation to low fertility and drought, high nitrogen use efficiencies and other environmental benefits makes Brachiaria grasses an ideal forage option. Basilisk, B. hybrid cv. Mulato II, B. humidicola cvs. Humidicola and Llanero) from South America were introduced and evaluated in multiple locations in Kenya for biomass production and adaptation to drought and low soil fertility. As the genetic materials developed in exotic environment were being evaluated in the sites within the centre of diversity of Brachiaria species priority was given to monitor response of these genetic materials to the diseases. As expected some of these cultivars were attacked by diseases.In the pasture production, diseases are major biotic constraint that reduces herbage and seed yields, lowers nutritive value and palatability of grasslands which eventually impact not only on animal health and productivity but also increase production costs (Pennypacker, 1997). Some Brachiaria diseases reported elsewhere include rust (Uromyces setariae-italicae), foliar leaf blight (Rhizoctonia solani), bacterial root rot (Erwinia chrysanthemi pv. zeae), leaf spot (Dreschslera sp) and sugarcane mosaic virus (Kelemu et al., 1995;Lenné and Trutmann, 1994). In tropical America, B. brizantha is susceptible to rust, foliar leaf blight and bacterial root rot (CIAT, 1992). In Brachiaria humidicola, rust can cause yield losses as high as 100% (Lenné, 1990). Therefore, this study was conducted to monitor diseases incidence and severity on improved Brachiaria cultivars planted in multiple locations in Kenya or and identify the causal agent associated with symptomatic Brachiaria plants using molecular technique. The information on the causal agent would be of great value in devising appropriate measures for the effective management of the diseases. 1. Detailed description of climate and soils of the sites are given by Njarui et al. (2006), in this proceeding.Disease symptoms were recorded; photographs were taken along with information on growth stage and crop types (first crop/regrowth). Disease incidence was recorded as percentage of plants with disease symptoms relative to the total number of plants. Disease severity was recorded as percentage of Brachiaria tissue covered by a specific symptom or lesion. The plant parts with disease symptoms were collected in paper envelopes and transported to the BecA-ILRI Hub for causal agent isolation and identification.The symptomatic plant parts were used for microbial isolation. The leaf with disease symptom was photographed, and cut along with healthy portion into ten pieces (0.4 to 0.6 mm 2 ). The cut pieces were surface disinfected with 1.2% sodium hypochlorite solutions (with Tween-20) for 10 minutes, rinsed three times with sterile water and dried in paper towel. Five leaf pieces were plated on 9 cm petri -dishes containing PDA amended with ampicillin (100 µg/ml), incubated at 25°C and monitored daily for emerging fungal colony. Fungal isolates were sub-cultured three times to obtain pure colonies for subsequent analysis. DNA was extracted using PrepMan kit following manufacturer's directions but with a 100 μl of PrepMan ultra sample preparation reagent instead of 200 µl. The final product was stored at 4 °C until further processing.DNA from previous step was diluted ten folds in sterile water. The PCR amplification was done using the universal fungal primer sets ITS1F (CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTA) and ITS4 (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) (Gardes and Bruns, 1993;White et al., 1990). PCR mix was prepared using 3 µl of diluted genomic DNA as template, 5 µl of PCR master mix, 2 µl of ITS1F, 2 µL of ITS4 and 28 µl of sterile reagent water in a total of volume of 40 µl, and reaction without template DNA was included as negative control. The PCR conditions were 4 min of denaturation at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 48°C for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s, with final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. Three µl PCR product was run in agarose gel to confirm the presence of expected PCR products.The PCR products were purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN) following manufacturer's instructions. Purified DNA products were sequenced with PCR primers sets using Sanger Sequencing at BecA-ILRI Hub.Maximum disease index (MDI) was calculated by multiplying score for maximum disease incidence (%) and maximum disease severity (%) for each disease recorded in each Brachiaria cultivar irrespective of type of experiment and survey event. The resulting score was divided by 100 to get MDI. For molecular identification, fungal sequence data were imported into CLC Main Workbench Software v7.5, trimmed and assembled. The sequence identities were determined using BLAST program of NCBI (blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Criteria used for BLAST search were: e-value below 0.004, the highest identity (%), the highest query coverage and the possibility of a fungus identified by blast search being a plant pathogen as confirmed by literature search. A list of fungal taxa associated with symptomatic Brachiaria plant parts was prepared and the frequency of similar taxa in the population was calculated.Monitoring disease incidence and severityLeaf spots were characterized by black to brown spots on Brachiaria leaves (Figure 1a). Infected leaves had brown to black raised to flat rough irregular spots which in severe cases coalesced and killed the entire leaf. Some spots had dark irregular centers surrounded by a tan to oval margin. Leaf spots were more on upper leaf surface compared with the lower leaf surface. The spots mainly occurred on older senescing leaves in both first and regrowth crops. The molecular identification of 240 fungal isolates obtained from symptomatic leaf, stem and seed heads of improved Brachiaria cultivars revealed 36 different pathogenic taxa at variable frequencies (Table 6). The top six plant pathogenic taxa were Phoma herbarum, Epicoccum nigrum, Fusarium equiseti, Nigrospora oryzae, Clasosporium cladosprioides, Nigrospora sphaerica, and Nigrospora sphaerica.Phoma herbarum was the most frequently isolated fungus (34.8%) from the Brachiaria tissues with leaf spots symptoms (Figure 1a). Phoma herbarum are reported as causal agents of leaf spots disease in pea (Li et al., 2011), stem canker on hemp (McPartland et. al., 2000) and tip dieback/or stem canker on forest nurseries (James, 1985). Phoma herbarum was among 15 Phoma species isolated from New Zealand grasses and pastures. Pathogenicity testing of these species showed P. medicaginis, P. lotivora and P. chrysanthemicola pathogenic on legumes, and other 12 species were weak wound parasites (Johnston, 1981). Besides pathogenic roles, P. herbarum has been considered a candidate for biological agent for weed control (Neumann and Boland 2002, Stewart-Wade and Boland 2004, Kalam et al., 2014).Fusarium equiseti was second most frequent fungus isolated from Brachiaria leaves. It is a cosmopolitan soil inhabitant (Saemi et al., 1999) capable of infecting seeds, roots, tubers, and fruit of several crop plants (Goswani et al., 2008). It is a common colonizer of senescent or damaged plant tissue (Leslie et al., 2006). Similarly, Epicoccum nigrum is a widespread and common saprophyte on dying plant organs but also a parasite on different hosts especially on seeds of cereals (Webster 1983). It produces colored pigments that can be used as antifungal agents (Bamford et al., 1961;Brown et al., 1987). In Kenya, the fungus was isolated from coffee, carnation, bitter lettuce, rice, and sugarcane (Kung'u and Boa, 1997). The fungus was isolated from Lablab bean as a cause agent of leaf spots (Mahadeva kumar et al., 2014).Nigrospora oryzae causes ear or cob rot in maize (Shurtleff, 1992) and leaf spot in Rosemary (Moshrefi Zarandi et al., 2014), and Dendrobium (Wu et al., 2014). Nigrospora sphaerica causes Nigrospora blight of turf grasses. Its primary hosts are Kentucky bluegrass, creeping red fescue, perennial rye grass and St. Augustine grass (Smiley et al., 2005). Others hosts includes Bermuda and bent grasses (Cho et al., 2000).The attack of ergot disease in Brachiaria raises some issues on 269 livestock and human health as the ingestion of ergot cause hallucinations, irrational behavior, convulsions and even death in humans and animals due to the poisonous ergot alkaloids (Tudzynski et al, 2001;Eadie, 2003). Besides health concerns, the infection of Brachiaria with ergot significantly reduces the seed quality and seed trades. This study with isolation of fungi from symptomatic plants of improved Brachiaria cultivars demonstrated the association of a wide range of fungal species. Phoma herbarum, Fusarium equiseti, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Epicoccum nigrum, Nigrospora oryzae and Nigrospora sphaerica constituted 70% of the fungal community. The current effort is a beginning of research on Brachiaria diseases and causal agents in Kenya. The future research on establishing relationships between these organisms and disease symptoms on host plant, confirmation of pathogenicity, yield loss assessment, and development of management methods for economically important diseases have been suggested for the effective and timely management of the important Brachiaria diseases in Kenya and neighboring countries. We also suggest further investigation on rust and physiological leaf disorder symptoms highlighted in this study."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1023418746.json b/main/part_2/1023418746.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0157551bcc4798dc28d83f5cc6ad1f30941220a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1023418746.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e3fa1bb6e68a0ce43937619fb18c1bcb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/84cd23bd-a60d-4677-a390-031cf9400651/retrieve","id":"326144713"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e3e6f8bb-6b3a-4a59-9763-877e29aae34c","content":"THE ECONOMIC impact of bullock traction technology (BTT) on the farming systems in northern Ghana is assessed. Crop production data were collected in three villages during the 1982/83 cropping season from 12 hoe-using and 30 bullock-using households. Comparative analysis of the hoe and the BTT farming systems indicates that BTT is technically and economically superior to hand-hoe technology, and that it offers a solution to the low agricultural productivity in the region. Households using BTT realised higher crop production and higher income compared to those using hand-hoe technology.Northern Ghana is in the semi-arid zone of West Africa, and has one rainy season which normally begins in May and ends in September. It is dominated by smallholders who depend almost exclusively on the traditional hand-hoe technology for crop production, the majority of which is used for subsistence.The unimodal rainy season, combined with the predominant hand-hoe technology, is a major problem for smallholder crop production in the region. Even though labour is abundant, availability during the short growing period is a critical constraint. Seasonal labour shortages are one of the main factors which contribute to low productivity, the primary agricultural problem in the area (NORRIP, 1982).To increase the production of cash crops and at the same time solve the problem of seasonal labour shortages encountered by peasant farmers, BTT was introduced in the region around 1930 by the then colonial government (Kline et al, 1969). As in most parts of West Africa, the priority given to bullock traction technology for crop cultivation shifted with changes in agricultural policies. Shortly after Ghana won independence in 1957, the newly-elected Government decided that bullock traction technology did not fit its concept of modernising Ghana's agricultural sector through the use of tractors. Consequently, Government support for BTT stopped. This policy change hindered further spread of the technology. Farmers who had already adopted BTT had problems getting spare parts, and those who were interested in adopting it had difficulty procuring equipment. However, aid agencies which were promoting BTT in the region continued to supply farmers with traction equipment purchased from neighbouring countries, but were not able to satisfy the growing demand. After long years of somewhat frustrating experiences with tractors in the region, combined with a weak economy, new attention has been directed to BTT by the Government.Even though BTT has survived in northern Ghana since it was first introduced, and is apparently beneficial, no effort has been made to investigate its economic impact on farming systems in the region. This paper analyses data collected from farmers in parts of northeastern Ghana, and compares the traditional hand-hoe and BTT farming systems for both technical and economic efficiency. Although the data in this analysis are from a limited area, the information is valid for other areas using BTT.Crop production in much of the semi-arid and arid zones of Africa is affected by the unimodal rainy season and the predominant hand-hoe technology. In these areas, land preparation cannot take place during the dry season because the soils are too dry to be worked, and farmers must wait until the beginning of the rainy season before they can start land preparation.Because the rainy season is usually short, land clearing, seedbed preparation and planting must be accomplished quickly to ensure the highest production possible. Farmers invariably face labour shortages during the limited time they have for these operations. In households where the increased labour demand cannot be satisfied, planting can be finished on time by reducing the cropped area, or the required operations are completed late. In both cases, the economic performance of the household is negatively affected.Because bullock-using farmers can work faster on a given unit of land than the hoe households, they can use the time saved for new tasks, such as manuring, application of chemical fertilizers and thorough weed control, which are crucial to improving agricultural productivity. Moreover, they are in a better position to increase the number of crops grown on a single piece of land.As a result of improved agronomic practices, productivity is expected to be higher under bullock farming than under hoe farming (Jäger, 1984). In areas where arable land is abundant, the time saved through BTT can be used to expand the cultivated area. Crop production will rise because of the extra output from the additional land brought under cultivation. Other benefits of changing from hand-hoe technology to any form of animal traction are reduced labour requirements per unit output and increased cropping intensity.The data in this paper were collected in three villages (Nakpanduri, Sakogu and Gbingbalanchet) in the northeastern part of northern Ghana from April 1982 to March 1983 (Panin, 1986). These settlements are inhabited mostly by people from the Mamprusi, Bimoba and Konkomba ethnic groups. Unlike in many parts of northern Ghana, the population density in the northeast is high. Even though the exact figure is not available, there is an indication that the area is approaching population saturation (NORRIP, 1982), which is supported by Tripp (1982) who reported that the population density in some parts of northeastern Ghana exceeds 150 persons km -2 compared with 17 persons km -2 for the whole region (Central Bureau of Statistics, 1984).The climate of the area is similar to that throughout northern Ghana. The rainy season is from June to September, and the average monthly temperature is about 30° C, with a maximum of 33° C recorded in March. The vegetation of the area is characterised by grass and scattered trees.Farming technology is still traditional; most farmers till their land with the traditional hand-hoe, but the use of animal traction is familiar in the area. About 20% of the farming population uses BTT, but only for ridging (Panin, 1986). Bullocks are the main draught animals used by the farmers. Unlike in other parts of West Africa where animal traction studies have been undertaken, no animal traction project had ever been established in the study villages before the farmers adopted BTT for crop cultivation.In the study area, as well as throughout northern Ghana, farmers cultivate two types of farmland; the compound farm, which surrounds the house, and bush farms, which may be located up to several kilometres from the house. The compound and the bush farming systems are based, respectively, on the principles of permanent and shifting cultivation (Benneh, 1973;Diehl and Runge-Metzger, 1985). Chemical fertilizers are known to the farmers, but are rarely used for crop production because supplies are both inadequate and irregular.During the year of investigation, data were collected from 42 randomly selected farming households. Twelve of these households were classified as hoe farmers, since they did not own draught animals and almost exclusively used the hoe for seedbed preparation. The other 30 households belonged to the animal traction group. Each had at least one pair of bullocks which were used to prepare seedbeds for almost all the cultivated land. The sample was stratified into three groups according to the experience acquired from the use of the animal traction technology in order to evaluate the impact of this experience on farmers' performance (see Panin, 1986). For this reason, the animal traction sample was purposely over represented.The hoe sample was chosen from 492 hoe households from all the three villages. Similarly, the bullock sample was selected from 122 bullock households. Data were collected through direct measurement, observation, and formal and informal interviews. The frequency of the interviews depended on the nature of data required. During the survey period, each plot was mapped, measured, and the crops grown were recorded, as was daily labour. Household labour, nonhousehold labour, and farming operations performed by each category were recorded separately. The labour record did not include the time spent walking to and from the fields.Crop yield estimates were recorded in local units of measure (baskets, pans and bowls), as indicated by the households during the triweekly visits of enumerators. A sample of the containers was randomly selected and the contents were weighed to establish kg per container. Later in the analysis, total crop output of each plot was converted into kilocalories (kcal) to provide a common basis to measure the different crops grown on a plot. Yields of minor crops, and their share of total cultivated area per household, were excluded from the analysis. Minor crops were yam, cassava, sweet potatoes, okra, tobacco, aubergine and pepper.Household income and expenses were obtained through weekly records of sales and purchases. Income from non-farm activities was recorded monthly. In order to have uniform prices for the evaluation of food purchases and sales, prices of food crops were recorded every market day. Since food commodities were sold by local volume measures, the kg equivalent of these measures was established each time the price was recorded.Both hoe and bullock households were large, polygamous, and had a high level of illiteracy. Bullock households were larger, with an average of 14.5 members compared to 10.8 in the hoe households (Table 1). When the number of workers was compared, either in terms of adults (defined as persons aged 16-55 years) or total labour capacity, bullock households had a larger labour force than the hoe households. The total labour capacity of a household was derived by using a weighting system to convert all household members from the age of six into standard man-working equivalents. The respective mean differences of household size and number of workers between the two groups of households were highly significant (Table 1). In the bullock sample, the household heads were older. The adoption of BTT correlated with the age of the household head. In the analysis, the correlation coefficient, while significant (P< 0.05), was only 0.32. Age was a principal motive for 37% of the heads to shift from hand-hoe technology to BTT. Since cattle are kept more for security than for farming, it is most likely that the household heads, who control the cattle, release bullocks for cultivation only when they are too old to use the hoe for seedbed preparation.The average number of cattle per bullock household was 17.3 compared to 1.5 per hoe household (Table 1). While every household in the bullock sample owned at least one cow or ox, 75% of the hoe households had no cattle. With only one exception, bullock households owned cattle before adopting BTT for crop cultivation, which indicates that the first farmers to adopt BTT were those who already had cattle.The area cultivated per hoe household ranged from 1.4 to 7.4 ha, with an average of 3.7 ha. The average area cultivated per bullock household was 6.4 ha with a range of 1.3 to 10.5 ha (P<0.01). About 75% of the cultivated area of bullock households was ridged with bullock traction compared to only 8% of that of hoe households (Table 1).Any major increase in average cultivated area per bullock household is usually assumed to be an effect of BTT, but in many cases households using BTT have a larger labour force (Table 1), and thus the increased area may be due to a difference in scale. Because of differences in family size, the real impact of BTT on cultivated area is assessed using a land/resident ratio, i.e. a ratio that reflects the relative factor intensity of the production technology being used (Crawford, 1982).The average cultivated area is defined both in terms of hectares per household member and per adult (Table 2). Cultivated area measured both ways was greater for bullock households. On a per member basis, the bullock farmers cultivated 20% more land than the hoe farmers, but the mean difference was not statistically significant. Per adult, the bullock households cultivated only slightly more land (4%) than the hoe households, which again was not statistically significant. These figures compare closely to the findings of Barrett et al (1982). According to the analysis, BTT did not cause any significant change in the area cultivated per adult worker. This can be traced to the individual motives of the farmers for adopting BTT: only 27% said that the ability to farm more land was a motive, while the majority of the bullock farmers reported that larger farm areas increase the demand for labour to weed and harvest the crop if the technology package does not include weeding and harvesting equipment. The correlation between total cultivated area and the annual labour input in man-hours was 0.39 (P< 0.01) for weeding and 0.84 (P<0.01) for harvesting, which supports the farmers' views.Nineteen crops were grown in the study area. Based on the percentage of the total cultivated area planted with each crop, eight are considered major in both the hoe and bullock farming systems: millet (early and late), maize, sorghum, groundnuts, cowpeas, bambara nuts and nari (a sesame variety) (Table 3). Millet, maize and sorghum are the major food crops in the area, while the others are cash crops, of which groundnuts are the most important. Nari (sesame variety) 0.8 0.9Others 1 1.3 1.51 Okra, pepper, garden eggs (aubergine), tobacco, sweet potatoes and yams. The cultivated areas of these crops are usually very small.There was little difference between the two groups in the area planted to the major food crops, and in both systems these crops predominatedalmost 80% for the hoe households and 74% for the bullock households. The bullock households had 5.5% more land under cash crops. BTT had only a small effect on the cropping pattern and does not appear to put the staple food crops at risk.The 19 individual crops were usually grown in mixtures (Table 4). Bullock households allocated slightly more land to mixed crop enterprises than the hoe households. While farmers planted between two and five crops on a piece of land, the majority of the land (64% for hoe households and 54% for bullock households) was planted to only two crops. Of particular interest was the crop diversification in the bullock households. The bullock households allocated as much as 33% of their total cultivated area to mixtures of three or more crops, while the area covered by such crop mixtures in the hoe farming systems was only 17%. This relatively high level of diversification among the bullock farmers is consistent with one of their reasons for adopting the technology; 60% of the bullock sample said that diversification was a motive for BTT adoption. The bullock farmers were able to achieve greater diversification than their hoe-using counterparts because of per hectare labour time saved from ridging and planting operations.The effect of BTT on crop yield is not clear. Reports from experiment stations show that crop yields increase on animal traction farms (Eicher and Baker, 1982;Pingali et al, 1987), but evidence from farmers' fields indicates only modest yield increases (Lassiter, 1982). In this study, bullock households had average yields of 3327 kcal ha -1 , while those of the hoe farmers averaged 2861 kcal ha -1 , a 16% difference (Table 5: 0.01< P< 0.20). Regression analysis was done to determine the potential impact of BTT on crop yields at the plot level (Table 6). The analysis at this level also eliminates any underestimate of the BTT yield effect due to hoe farmers borrowing bullocks for ridging and/or to a failure of bullock farmers to ridge all their plots with BTT. Its results show that BTT had a positive impact on the level of crop yield (P< 0.01). This contrasts with most studies on animal traction which did not show any significant yield effect (Pingali et al, 1987). Total labour use per farm was greater in bullock than in hoe households (Table 7). On an average hoe-using farm, the total average annual labour input per hectare was 568 ME-hours, while on an average bullock farm it was 625 ME-hours. The mean difference was not statistically significant, but the result contrasts with those of similar studies (e.g. Barrett et al, 1982). The use of BTT significantly reduced the per hectare labour requirement for ridging from 42 MEhours under the hand-hoe farming system to 28 ME-hours (P< 0.05). Per hectare labour requirement for planting was also reduced, but the mean difference was not statistically significant. On the other hand, bullock farmers had higher clearing, weeding and harvesting labour requirements per hectare than the hoe farmers. However, none of the mean differences were statistically significant.The overall increase in labour-use intensity on the bullock farms should not be surprising, because besides ridging, which benefits most directly from the use of BTT, all the other operations are performed manually. The drop in labour input for planting is an effect of ridging, because planting or sowing is faster on ridged plots than on flat land.Increased labour requirements for clearing, weeding and harvesting may be explained as follows: The shift from hand-hoe to bullock traction technology requires that land be cleared more thoroughly. The usual practice in hoe farming is to burn the vegetation and leave the stumps and roots, whereas with BTT, stumps and roots must be removed to avoid potential damage to both implements and animals. The extra work initially increases the labour per hectare to clear the land, but this effect is likely to disappear after the first 2 years.  Deeper ridging enables both crops and weeds to grow faster, thus increasing the need for weeding on bullock farms. In addition, more diverse crops may also require more labour for weeding.  The higher crop yields achieved under bullock farming require more harvest labour.A linear regression analysis, which included farm size, household labour force, and the use of BTT (a dummy variable) as independent variables and labour intensity as dependent variable (Table 8), showed that overall, the use of BTT did not significantly affect the total labour input per hectare. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1041342176.json b/main/part_2/1041342176.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a823898e5fb0af88d25bf099fa62bae3a0d43ec --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1041342176.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e4e67096f1c2064343cd9be84d97a83b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://www.netjournals.org/pdf/NJAS/2014/1/13-047.pdf","id":"2094493082"},"keywords":["Conventional seed system","local traditional seed systems","integrated seed systems","communitybased seed system","seed industry"],"sieverID":"295d6799-98f7-4e40-9701-50594ebf8fab","content":"This review gives key information about seed systems with the objective of helping countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to design appropriate strategies based on their own local realities. It starts with an in-depth assessment of the rice seed sector and emphasizes the factors that can influence its development. These factors may be associated with the biological characteristics of the rice crop, the complexity of farming systems, the policy environment, and the markets. The historical background of the seed sector in SSA is described in order to give a clear picture of the different attempts to find solutions in different countries and sub-regions. Five major strategic models and several alternative seed strategies are identified. However, local traditional seed systems will remain the primary source of seed supply for the majority of farmers for many years to come. These systems are based on farmer-saved seed and farmer-to-farmer seed exchanges, which are efficient tools in seed dissemination and food security. It is time to recognize local traditional systems and their contribution to the maintenance of seed quality and crop diversity and to develop tools for their better utilization. The community-based seed system (CBSS) is proposed as such a tool. CBSS encourages technicians to recognize local traditional seed systems and to build integrated seed approaches that take into consideration local realities and the socio-cultural dimension of seed within African communities. This will likely require a transition period of 5 to 10 years to build the fundamentals of sustainable seed systems through the structuring of the seed sector and the creation of appropriate conditions to ensure food security, enriched biodiversity and sustainable production. With climate change, local traditional seed systems, as well as integrated seed approaches, will likely play a more important role to improve the performance of agricultural systems while ensuring farmer autonomy.African agricultural productivity is generally low, especially among poor smallholder farmers. A range of factors explains this low productivity, including the infrequent availability of improved varieties that are well adapted to low input systems and the absence of appropriate policies to encourage the development of the seed sector and ensure the sustainability of farming systems. Indeed, national seed systems are unable to meet farmers' needs for quality seed of improved varieties for intensive agricultural systems.Most farmers regularly resort to using traditional local varieties and associated knowledge in seed production through farmer-saved seed, seed conservation, and seed diffusion. Usually, these varieties are not officially recognized. They are, however, efficient in maintaining diversity within the rice crop as a source of sustainability and adaptation to climate change. Röling and Wagemakers (1998) suggest that it is important to look at agriculture as one of the oldest ways in which humans modify ecosystems to produce the goods and services they desire. For them, agriculture plays a leading role in issues of land degradation, habitat loss, ecosystem loss, water scarcity, pollution, energy, and climate modification. Developing more sustainable agro-ecosystems will likely require seed systems that involve strong links between agriculture, ecology and society.The issue of appropriate seed systems has been raised many times during recent decades and came to the forefront specifically in 2008 when food prices soared and seeds of food crops were not available. Most Western and Central African countries tried without success to import seeds from East Africa, mainly from Uganda. Others initiated relief programs with assistance from donors and technical partners (including the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), African Development Bank, World Bank, West African Development Bank, Japan International Cooperation Agency, International Fund for Agricultural Development, and European Union. These actions are worthy but not enough to efficiently face farmers' needs in the long term.Interventions by the private sector are erratic and limited to hybrids and high added value crops (cash crops and vegetables). Cereals are, in general, covered by private companies only when government subsidies are available.It is, however, important to remember that seed is the first input in agriculture. Guaranteeing farmers' access to quality seed can only be achieved if there are viable seed supply systems to multiply and distribute the seeds that have been produced or preserved and if mechanisms to assist farmers in emergency situations have been established. To that end, agricultural policies must emphasize seed strategies that can ensure the availability of locally appropriate varieties to men and women farmers in a timely and affordable fashion.Rice is used as an example in this paper, as it is a food crop which is mainly cultivated in subsistence agriculture and, at the same time, as a cash crop. This means that different seed systemsboth local traditional and conventionalare used. To better address the issue, it seems necessary firstly to give a clear picture of ricefarming systems, secondly to call attention to positive impacts but also limits of conventional and traditional local seed systems, and thirdly, to raise questions related to integrated seed strategies and decentralized approaches.The evolution of the seed sector is in general tightly linked with the evolution of research and development approaches in Africa. Three major periods can be identified: (i) Before independence to the 1980sthe provision of seeds was state-managed; (ii) 1980 to 1990s the seed sector was liberalized and privatized; (iii) 1990Net J Agric Sci 12 to 2013the role of farmers' groups is increasing.During the first years of independence, African countries focused on the development of the state farm sector, communal villages and cooperatives. The period was characterized by the leadership of state-managed companies, which controlled the whole seed value chain from seed production to seed commercialization and seed distribution. This system applied to most cash crops, including cotton, groundnut, and vegetables. Seed was sold to farmers' cooperatives by private companies such as SOFACO, Callivoire, and Semivoire in Côte d'Ivoire, Pioneer in Nigeria, and CFDT 1 in Senegal. These companies were supported by research institutes in Belgium, England, France, USA and elsewhere.Governments gave strong support for the development of the seed industry in many countries in Western and Southern Africa through the creation of seed stations, conditioning units, and storage facilities. National seed rules and regulations were elaborated with the objective of helping to develop seed markets. Seed laboratories were also created. Seed inspectors and technicians were trained with assistance from FAO and foreign countries (e.g. Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the USA). Strategic seed security stocks were established in many countries in case catastrophes occur (e.g. rice in Nigeria, soybeans in Côte d'Ivoire, groundnut in Senegal, and maize in Zimbabwe).Regarding cereals, only irrigated rice and maize benefitted from state support, while rainfed crops, owned by the family farm sector, were more or less neglected and populations suffered greatly from seed shortages during the droughts of 1968 and 1974.This period corresponds with the liberalization/privatization of the seed sector. The process started at the end of the 1980s. The equipment that had been acquired by the states was sold and state-managed companies privatized. Private seed companies were encouraged to become established and to take positions of leadership (Cromwell, 1996). However, the process did not survive long and most seed companies collapsed. Markets were small because they were limited to irrigated zones within national boundaries.Moreover, the process of liberalization/privatization of the seed sector has also had a negative impact on the evolution of the national seed services and national seed policies. Consequently, in all countries national seed programs collapsed gradually.During this period, more responsibility was given to farmers and the private sector. Many seed farmers' groups and professional unions such as -interprofessions‖ (rice inter-branch organizations) were created. Local private seed companies emerged but many collapsed at an early stage of development because of narrow markets and lack of information on seed demands from farmers. With the exception of a few countries (such as South Africa where the commercialization of hybrid maize and vegetables is well organized), there is very little evidence of successful commercial seed sector development. However, since the 2008 food crisis, the situation has improved greatly. Several farmers' groups were able to access subsidized credit for seed in most western, eastern, and southern African countries. In particular, in countries of West Africa (e.g. Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Mali and Senegal), this opportunity was extended to long-term investments for tractors (and accessories) and seedprocessing machines. Harmonized seed rules and regulations were adopted in Regional Economic Communities. This environment has led to the development of many small-scale private companies and rural seed enterprises.Many factors have been identified as having key influences on the development of the rice seed sector. Among them the following factors were recorded as playing a key role in the development of the seed sector: (i) specificity of the biology of the rice crop; (ii) complexity of production/farming systems; and (iii) policy environment.The structure of floral organs and the brief period of receptivity of the pollen grains have allowed rice to become an autogamous and self-pollinating crop. Rice flowers are generally self-pollinated because of a number of limiting factors (length of style and anthers, structure of the stigma, limited pollen viability, brief period of opening of florets, and release of pollens (between 30 s and 9 min) (Morishima, 1984;Oka and Morishima, 1967;Oka, 1988). This characteristic is important as it favors the conservation of rice seeds with unvaried characteristics for several years because of the very limited rate of outcrossing. This can occur but does not usually exceed Bèye and Wopereis 13 0.05% for cultivated rice species (Oka, 1988). It has been reported that the outcrossing rate of wild species is higher. In the case of red rice biotypes, depending on the humidity level and the temperature, the outcrosses can be as high as 0.2% (Shivrain et al., 2009).The actual upland and rainfed lowland rice seed systems in Africa consist of the management and use of ownsaved seed and informal sharing in the good years when there are no problems, and sourcing seed from the local grain markets when there is a shortfall in farmers' ownsaved seed. These are individual transactions where the farmer usually knows the seed seller and is able to verify the origin of the seed being considered for purchase. The Communities' Trust makes grants to support seed exchanges and seed commercialization in this situation, representing a form of seed certification.Rice is grown mainly in four major agro-ecological systems: upland, hydromorphic, lowland and irrigated.The farming systems differ from each other in terms of constraints and potentials. Rice species are usually adapted to grow in at least two ecosystems. In some exceptional cases they are suitable for all four ecosystems but differ in productivity (from 1 to 8-10 metric tonnes per hectare) and in quality (e.g. protein content, palatability, and presence of aroma).Each crop variety may be adapted to a particular type of soil, climate and growing season. Its genes may endow it with traits needed by farmers: disease resistance, cold or heat tolerance, special taste or nutritional qualities, etc. These qualities provide farmers and plant breeders with raw materials to improve their crops and adapt them to the changing environmental conditions.Concerning seed production, two major ecosystems can be distinguished: irrigated and rainfed zones.Although Africa has large water resources with irrigation potential for 90 million hectares, crop land that is currently irrigated represent less than 10% of the existing potential, that is, much less than in India (26%), the Philippines (40%) and China (44%). Most of the irrigation schemes are located within the major drainage basins (e.g. Congo, Nile, Niger, Orange, Senegal and Zambezi) and lakes (e.g. Chad, Victoria, and Tanganyika). They represent only 3% of all cultivated areas in SSA (FAO, 2006a). As shown in Figure 1, each agroecological ecosystem is subject to its own particular constraints.Under irrigation, seed production is conducted under intensive conditions using in many cases the conventional seed system. Irrigated zones are known for utilizing improved varieties because of their high value returns. Credit is available for farm inputs such as fertilizers and seeds. In the rainfed ecosystems, which cover roughly upland, hydromorphic, and lowland areas, farmer-saved seed is common. The environment is characterized by small and dispersed farmers' plots. Resource management practices are often complex and interdependent.In these systems, diversity is the norm and farmers cultivate a great number of rice varieties (up to 10 in some households in forest zones) in association with tubers and roots, maize, and legumes (Figure 2). By mixing crops, farmers reduce risk in case natural catastrophes occur (such as drought and flooding), reduce crop losses from pests and diseases, and make more efficient use of farm labor (Dixon et al., 2001).The policy environment relates to the existence of seed legislation, variety registration, the functioning of the national release committees and national seed services with real capacities to conduct seed certification, and access to credit and markets.Until recently, most African countries did not have a conducive policy environment. Agricultural policies adopted in the first years of independence favored collective farming and state farms. In countries like Côte d'Ivoire, for example, big state seed stations were opened in Touba and Odienne under the ‗Office des semences et plants'. In Touba, storage facilities were installed to store up to 3,200 tonnes of seed of soybeans and 1,600 tonnes of rice seed. A seed-testing laboratory (Laboratoire national des semences et plants) was created in Yamoussoukro with the objective of giving support to private seed companies. Indeed, all investments in the agricultural services were geared towards the development of the commercial farming sector.However, it should be mentioned that in general, seed testing, wherever it exists, is centralized and suffers budgetary constraints. Farmers are asked to pay for field inspections and laboratory controls and for technicians to travel to conduct field visits. Those who do not pay cannot benefit from seed controllers and their seed is not certified. Therefore, policy measures and guidelines emanating from governments concerning the seed sector do not address the real needs and problems of the smallscale or subsistence farmers.In the last two decades, FAO, in collaboration with the Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) centers, sub-regional organizations (Southern African Development Community [SADC], Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa, and West and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development), and European, American, and Japanese governments assisted most countries in Western, Central, Eastern, and Southern Africa to elaborate national legislation and to train national inspectors and laboratory controllers. In addition, harmonized regulatory frameworks and regional varietal catalogs were developed at regional levels (the examples of West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU), Comité permanent Inter-Etats de Lutte contre la Sécheresse dans le Sahel and Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). That means private companies can now evolve beyond national political frontiers. Henceforth, at least in theory, once a variety is released in a country, it is possible to sell its seeds in all the countries belonging to the same agro-ecological zones within the same sub-region.Indeed, the harmonized seed rules and regulations are still difficult to implement on the ground despite state approvals. Firstly, statutory seed standards adopted by the sub-regions seem to be high because they are extracted, without any deep adaptation, from existing seed standards derived directly from European standards. Consequently, they are relatively difficult to achieve by most small seed producers. Secondly, national seed boards and seed control infrastructures are still not operational in most countries. Thirdly, seed regulations are never a finished business. Alongside technologies, seed legislations need to be adapted. Seed Bèye and Wopereis 15 regulations targeting simple varieties are not the same as those covering hybrids or genetically modified organisms.In both Africa and Asia, rice is considered as a cash crop only in irrigated zones where it benefits from subsidies for seed and fertilizers, which are incorporated in the conditions for gaining access to credit. In rainfed zones, the situation is different. However, some successful experiences were recorded, mainly with maize (in Malawi and Zimbabwe), after the severe drought in the 1991/92 growing season, in the form of a -Starter Pack scheme‖ followed by the distribution of hybrid seed and fertilizer in subsequent seasons. The same good results were registered with maize in cotton-growing zones in Western and Central Africa.The development of the seed industry is weak in Western and Central Africa. Few private companies exist and they mainly focus on the production of maize and sorghum hybrids. Rice seed production is usually not attractive for the private sector due to its self-pollinated character. The value-added margin is very small. Once farmers get access to new varieties, they tend to use the seeds obtained for many years before renewing them. Despite this, it is important to mention that there are significant opportunities for the development of the seed sector. Seed is seen in all countries as the first input in agriculture. Farmers are constantly looking for new varieties. Especially with climate change, they look for varieties that are early maturing, tolerant of drought, iron toxicity, and acidity, or that are well adapted to flooding, bird damage or insect attacks.In these regions, the seed industry is well developed for most crops (maize, wheat, sunflower, and pulses) except for rice, which is dominated by the traditional local seed sector. However, some specificities can be underlined. In Tanzania and Zambia, for example, Quality Declared Seed (QDS) is widely used.In Tanzania, quality control is done on-farm by farmers, while the official seed certification authority performs spot-checking of the seed and occasional field supervision. The Tanzania Official Seed Certification Agency inspects only 10% of the crop.The QDS, developed by FAO, looks for less rigid seed legislations for countries that are not able to meet the International Seed Trade Association standards. According to Britt Granqvist, Denmark (2009), QDS is designed to assist the growth of the seed trade while encouraging the use of quality certified seeds.Truthfully labeled seed is also used. It is uncertified seed that meets minimum prescribed laboratory standards regarding the genetic purity, germination rate, and moisture content laid down for a variety. Through this, companies are allowed to do their own tests but are not authorized to carry official certification tags.In Asia, the seed industry benefited greatly from the effects of the Green Revolution in the 1960s to 1970s when parastatal agencies provided an institutional framework within which private companies could develop several seed activities including breeding, multiplication, processing, marketing, certification, and commercialization of seed of high yielding varieties.In particular, in South Asia (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh), private companies also benefited from seed processing units which were established with assistance from World Bank projects.Regarding policy issues, the optional seed laws on seed certification, together with the large market size, have helped India to develop a seed industry rapidly.In general, seed of self-pollinated crops like rice is subsidized both for private and public companies per kilogram of seed sold. Through this system, private companies are encouraged to provide farmers with rice seed. However, private companies target mainly hybrids while self-pollinated seed is under the responsibility of public companies.Private companies are encouraged to work at the level of provinces through incentives. Despite that, the replacement rate of self-pollinated seed per year is still lowaround 5% against 100% for hybrids (SeedNet India, 2002). Focus is then put on providing advice on production techniques such as seed sorting, germination rate testing, rouguing, on-time harvesting, and proper storage. Private companies are also authorized to provide seed processing and treatment services to farmers.Generally, three major seed systems and delivery models are registered in SSA countries:(i) The conventional seed system (ii) The traditional local seed systems (iii) The integrated seed system.Net J Agric Sci 16The conventional seed system includes both the public, or government, and private or commercial, seed sectors. Once a national release committee releases a variety, authorization to produce improved seed is given. At the beginning, just a few panicles (around 100) are planted to constitute Breeder seed (G0) from which Foundation seed (G1, G2 and G3), Registered seed (G4) and Commercial seeds (R1 and R2) are produced (Figure 3). The conventional seed system (also called the formal seed system) is intended to provide certified seed. The system is market-oriented and has uniform standards based on distinctness, uniformity and stability. The system is influenced by a large number of policies in research, variety release procedures, seed production, and trade rules and regulations with the objective on the one hand of protecting countries against the introduction of foreign pests (insects, diseases and weeds) and on the other hand, of organizing the functioning of the seed system at different stages, (e.g. identification of seed growers and their competences, field inspections and laboratory analyses, supervision of seed conditioning, regular visits to commercialization points). If a farmer is unhappy with the quality of the seed bought, cross-check analyses are conducted by national and, in some cases, international accredited seed laboratories and the bad seed batches are seized. Other administrative measures including legal actions can also be taken.The conventional seed system seems to be designed mainly for cash crops. Others crops particular to smallscale farming systems get little attention. They benefit from farmer-saved seed through farmer-to-farmer seed exchanges.The systematic promotion of uniform improved varieties has led to decreased genetic diversity, both within and between varieties and species. According to Hoisington et al. (1999), this is mostly due to the widespread replacement of genetically diverse traditional varieties or landraces by homogeneous modern varieties.It has been suggested that the resulting crop genetic homogenization is a threat to the sustainability of production systems, and several studies now emphasize the importance of both inter-specific (Altieri, 1999(Altieri, , 2001;;Lin, 2011) and intra-specific crop diversity (Macfadyen and Bohan, 2010).In spite of an increasing number of registered crop varieties since the 1960s, the majority of agricultural land in developed countries is now covered with a few -winning‖ productive varieties, with generally a single crop per field, so that the actual cultivated diversity is low (for examples from France, see FranceAgriMer and In Africa, several cases were recorded. Among them, one can cite:(i) The rapid evolution of the Cassava Bacterial Blight (Xanthomona saxonopodis pv. Manihotis) and the mealy bug (Phenacoccus manihoti) or the Cercospora of banana in the 1980s;(ii) The destruction by the groundnut rosette virus of part of the Bambey groundnut collection of seeds, in 1952;(iii) The destruction in Northern Nigeria by the groundnut rosette virus of 0.75 million hectares of groundnut that were cultivated under the variety 55 to 437 (Yayock et al., 1976).It is now accepted in the developed countries that crop genetic diversity has been decreasing steadily in the agricultural landscapes since the early 20th century (FAO, 1997; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2006). The decrease of crop genetic diversity (also called genetic erosion) has also had a very negative impact on the existence of wild species and landraces that represent very important sources for food security but also, for plant breeding. These materials are frequently used in plant breeding with the objective of developing specific breeding programs for micronutrient-content improvement including wild species (Louwaars et al., 2003).Nowadays, many crosses are being made to enrich the genetic diversity of species. For example, at the Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), many crosses were made between Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima (cultivated crops) with wild species like O. longistaminata, O. barthii and O. stapfii. These species offer many advantages in terms of adaptation to climate change and to different ecologies of upland, lowland, irrigated mangrove zones and deep water. They offer also made available to the target populations in order to improve their nutritional status and health, to children suffering from avitaminosis, and to diseased populations suffering from diabetics and high blood pressure.Since the structural adjustments that occurred in the 1980s in the developing countries, the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of public seed supply systems was recognized (Cromwell and Wiggins, 1995). In Senegal, for example, less than 80% of the seeds used by farmers in the 1970s were farmer-saved seed (Venkatesan, 1994); but this has increased drastically after the structural adjustments.From that period, many national development structures and seed services have been significantly reduced while the involvement of private companies has not been effective. Several companies tried to take over the vacant places left by national development structures but had to give up quickly. The market was narrow and not well structured. Recently, in the last two decades, alternative seed strategies for smallholder seed supply have been developed in several countries (Rohrbach, 1997;FAO, 2006b). An example is the QDS in Tanzania and Zambia.Other seed classes are used in some countries in Eastern Africa: Guaranteed Seed in Mozambique, Standard Seed in Botswana, Commercial Seed in Kenya and Uganda, and Approved Seed in Malawi. In West Africa, precisely in Senegal, private Authorized Technicians are accredited to conduct field inspections instead of State Inspectors.Alternative strategies to the conventional system are used in many SSA countries with the objective of improving farmers' access to improved varieties. They differ from one country to another but they all tend to transfer more responsibility to farmers. This is really interesting because farmers look all the time for different types of genetic materials including landraces, breeding lines and neglected species. In addition, farmers are the only ones who know what their own needs are.Traditional local seed systems are filling the large gap created by the poor performance of the public sector and the low interest from the private sector (Ntare, 2001;FAO/TCIW, 2002;TripleLine, 2008). These are mainly traditional, informal systems operating at the community level through seed exchange mechanisms. Farmer-saved seed is the most common way to obtain seed. Farmers also use other diverse seed supply sources. They get seed from friends, relatives, extension agencies, and research. They also from time to time purchase seeds from the local markets (Haugen, 2001).These systems offer a range of landraces, local cultivars and improved varieties that are accessible and are of acceptable quality. The systems are often described as operating at the local level. Therefore, they offer cheaper and more efficient ways of delivering seed to farmers especially at low or no transaction costs.Traditional local seed systems are also wonderful sources for the development and the maintenance of the diversity of crops within and between species and their wild relatives (Almekinders and Louwaars 1999;Jarvis et al., 2000). According to Cary Fowler (2008), -diversity is one of the most fundamentally important resources for human life. This diversity is awe-inspiring. It provides the natural, biological basis of our ability to grow the food required today, as well as to meet the challenges of population growth, changing climates and constantly evolving pests and diseases.‖The diversity of varieties is high. It comprises local Net J Agric Sci 18 traditional varieties, landraces, improved varieties, and breeding lines. This is mainly typical for rainfed upland rice cultivation. According to Haugerud and Collinson (1990), it is recognized that farmers select cultivars on criteria that go beyond the yield potential envisioned in conventional plant breeding schemes. Cultivars of different maturities are often required to accommodate early or late planting, variability in rainfall, or compatibility with intercrops or rotations; storage characteristics often assume greater importance for the farm household than for the plant breeder; local food preparation techniques and preferences often favor one cultivar over another; utilization of non-grain biomass (e.g. leaves, stalks) for fodder, fuel, or building and other uses. These factors are not ethnographic curiosities but rather form part of the rigorous selection criteria that farmers use in accepting, or rejecting seed of a new cultivar.As usual, in SSA, the diversity of the varieties is maintained by some families who are given the responsibility to take care of them on behalf of the communities (for example, ruling families in any traditional community). Whatever happens, the local communities have to respond altogether. In fact, seeds are vehicles of the civilization and the traditions and have to be made available to all members of the communities.In Casamance (south Senegal) for example, in the Diola ethnic group, the King has the duty to conserve all existing varieties for several generations, including varieties with special taste, nutritional values or important socio-cultural values linked with religious and cultural ceremonies (e.g. spreading of seeds of some selected varieties during marriage ceremonies as sign of fecundity, feeding of circumcised young boys with red 2 and black 3 rice). The King has also to ensure that everybody is able to plant the needed variety at the appropriate planting time.Although National Seed Strategies refer to the local traditional seed systems, the National Agricultural Policy Documents do not make reference to them. In countries like Senegal, these are called ‗Reserves personnelles'. Seed legislations do not recognize them and do not provide a way for them to be formalized. Consequently, local traditional seed systems are known as the ‗informal seed sector', which means -non official‖, or -out of law‖. However, local varieties sell well in local markets or through seed fairs and voucher systems (e.g. in Burkina Faso, Mali, Mozambique, Rwanda).Traditional local seed systems are not market-oriented and consequently do not use the same norms as conventional seed systems. Seed certification is here done by whole communities who rely on field observations and on trust. This is called ‗social certification'. In reality, once a farmer has been deceived by the quality of the product given by a provider, all other farmers will boycott the provider forever. Farmers operate mass-selection, which is conducted each cropping season. Sometimes, varieties are developed through selection of new characteristics that appear spontaneously in the populations. This process of renewal is associated with -informal‖ seed exchanges, -local‖ or -traditional‖ social structures and systems of knowledge, which can in fact be very modern (in agroecological terms, for instance).Farmers' varieties are selected and produced most often for the producer's own consumption; the quality of farmer varieties obeys superior standards. This is typically true regarding nutritional values and taste. According to \"Seeds and Farmers' Rights\" (2011), this is not the case for commercial varieties, selected principally for their returns and adaptation to industrial production methods, mechanization, transport, longevity on supermarket shelves, and other characteristics.That means that selection is a continuing process with a dynamic interaction between nature (agro-biodiversity) and farmers' careful selection and breeding. Figure 4 shows how traditional local seed systems function. Once a farmer gets a variety, he will usually first check its purity and germination rate. Then, he will plant it and at harvest time collect the best seeds to be stored for the next season. If the seed comes from outside (mainly from the market), the farmer will ask for advice from his friends and relatives, and sometimes from the local extension technician. Here, trust will be decisive. Figure 4 also shows that ‗social certification' is done at any time and at all stages (growing plant, seed).The system operates seasonally through four major activities: mass-selection, farmer-saved seed, seed exchange, and social seed certification. It benefits also from a regular provision of diverse genetic materials coming from outside (e.g. landraces, local and improved varieties, breeding lines). Another particularity of local traditional seed systems is that usually there is no clear difference between the consumed grain and the stored seeds. For the farmer, they are both important. In addition, the seed is of variable quality (of different purity, and physical and physiological quality) (Almekinders and Louwaars, 1999). The steps in seed choice, multiplication, dissemination, and storage take place as integral parts of farmers' production systems and are guided by local technical knowledge and standards and by local social structures and norms (Sperling and Cooper, 2003). This way of acting prevents huge losses of seeds. However, traditional local seed systems are exposed to external catastrophes like natural disasters (drought, floods or pest outbreaks) and civil wars. Seed movements are intensive within the local communities and even beyond.While saving seed and even exchanging seed with other farmers for biodiversity purposes has been a traditional practice, these practices have become illegal for the plant varieties that are patented or otherwise owned by some entity (often a corporation). Under Article 28 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (the TRIPS Agreement), \"planting, harvesting, saving, re-planting, and exchanging seeds of patented plants, or of plants containing patented cells and genes, constitutes use\" and is prohibited by the intellectual property laws of signatory states (Vellve, 1992).Significantly, farmers in developing countries are particularly affected by prohibitions on seed saving. There are some protections for re-use, called \"farmer's privilege\", in the 1991 International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV Convention), but seed exchange remains prohibited. In contrast, in the USA the farmer's privilege is considered protected by the Plant Variety Protection Act and by case law stemming from Asgrow Seed v. Winterboer. American farmers may sell seed up to the amount saved for replanting their own acreage (The Crucible II Group, 2001).Farmers are good plant breeders. They constantly target the preservation and the maintenance of the diversity of species and varieties. They look for healthy and sustainable food systems for the benefit of their local communities, their economies, and environments. These concepts are different than those developed by the multinational companies which look for more profit through the monopoly of few varieties.According to Diamond v. Chakrabarty, companies may obtain patents for life forms while J.E.M. Ag Supply v. Pioneer, consider that seed saving is a patent violation (Mechlem and Raney, 2007). That situation has now evolved and farmers' rights are taken into account more and more.At the FAO Conference in 1989, member countries endorsed the concept of Farmers' Rights which was defined as -Rights arising from the past, present, and future contributions of farmers in conserving, improving, and making available plant genetic resources particularly those in the centers of origin / diversity‖. From that point, several developing countries defended farmers' rights as rights to: (i) Protect traditional knowledge; (ii) Share in the benefits of the use of genetic resources; and (iii) Participate in policy making relevant to genetic resources.Two interesting cases can be cited:1. In India: Farmers have the right to save, use, Net J Agric Sci 20 exchange, and sell farm-saved seed, but not on the commercial market. 2. In Ethiopia: Smallholder farmers have the right to save, use, exchange, and sell seed without restrictions. Commercial farmers may be allowed to save seed for food crops for national food security while export-oriented enterprises (horticulture) have to follow the international standard (no saving of seed).According to Louwaars (2012) These changes raise the hope that farmers' rights will be better preserved and farmer-saved seed recognized by researchers. Integrated seed systems conceal interests of both seed systems: conventional and traditional local systems.The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGR) adopted in 2001 offers opportunities for greater respect for farmers' rights by establishing an efficient and effective way of facilitating access to plant genetic resources while sharing the benefits from such a system in a fair and equitable way.The conventional seed system is known to be typically characterized by heavy and inefficient bureaucratic structures with classic seed regulatory frameworks and inadequate access to markets (Lipton and Longhurst, 1989;Tripp, 2001;De Boef et al., 1997).As mentioned earlier, the conventional system is market-oriented. That means the marketing component takes the lead in the chain. But in reality, this has not happened in SSA countries. The focus was put mainly on development aspects privileging breeding and seed production activities excluding commercialization for which the system is designed. That shift from marketoriented to development-oriented chains derives from the importance given by the private sector mainly to high value crops (cash crops and hybrids).In contrast, traditional local seed systems are more development-than market-oriented. Smallholder farmers operate in complex, risk-prone, and diverse environments. In such environments, it is difficult to use only one seed system. A diversity of approaches will be more consistent. However, the methodologies for seed regulation frequently constitute barriers for potential interactions between the conventional and the local traditional systems, other than those at the stage of germplasm collection and the commercialization of varieties (Tripp, 1997a(Tripp, , 1997b;;Louwaars, 1994a).In order to find appropriate solutions, several alternative schemes involving smallholder farmers were used by governments as well as non-government organizations (NGOs) in the 1990s (cases of Mozambique, The Gambia, and Zambia; Cromwell et al., 1992;Wiggins, 1992). Within those schemes, emphasis was usually put on seed production through contracts, supervision of the seed production, seed certification and seed processing. However, these schemes worked in parallel with local seed systems. They were also quickly captured by businessmen farmers, while stallholder farmers continued as usual to use farm-saved seed of both local and modern varieties.A new concept called Integrated Seed System Development (ISSD) was designed to support the development of programs and policies coherent with the local realities of farmers. The objective was to create a useful conceptual framework for developing coherence among seed practices, programs, and policies. The system is intended to integrate both the conventional seed system and local traditional seed systems at the technical and institutional levels (Louwaars, 1994b;De Boef et al., 1997).According to Louwaars and De Boef (2012), ISSD promotes two principles. The first principle leads to the facilitation of interactions between the conventional and traditional local seed systems by addressing the differentiation between development and market-oriented seed value chains in recognizing that no single public, private-, community-or NGO-based intervention can support seed sector development. The individual farmers themselves use different seed systems for different crops.The second principle considers that the seed sector development needs to be approached in a pluralistic manner, including public, private, community-based, or NGO stakeholders, each of them assuming specific responsibilities in dissimilar seed value chains.Through these approaches, ISSD has helped to better understand positive aspects as well as the limitations of conventional and local traditional seed systems. It accepts that all seed chains that play an important role in seed sector development, that is, instead of taking a linear approach (Douglas, 1980).Like ISSD, another scheme called the Community-Based Seed System (CBSS) was developed in 1997 by Africa Rice and the Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles. The system derives from lessons learnt from different seed sectors including cotton and maize, and other food crops, in-situ management of plant genetic Bèye and Wopereis 21 resources, and the socio-cultural dimension of the seed in African societies (Bèye and Bâ, 1998). CBSS aims to perfectly integrate the strengths and opportunities in both the conventional (for the production of Breeder and Foundation seeds) and the traditional local seed systems (for diffusion techniques of improved as well as traditional varieties). The system aims to help farmers to better meet their seed needs, and to become linked to the market (Bèye et al., 2009). It also promotes food security agro-biodiversity and reveals the sociological, ethnographic, and environmental values of farmer-seeds. Figure 5 shows interactions between the two types of seed systems. These interactions go beyond simple seed exchanges and adopt a pluralistic approach that promotes complementary seed sector development including: (i) The regular provision of improved genetic material (Breeder and certified Foundation seed of improved varieties) and (ii) The provision of quality seed of local cultivars and landraces (when needed).Figure 5 gives a clear picture of how the system functions at the community level and reveals four new functions of CBSS: adaptation of seed rules and regulations to local realities, enterprise development, decentralized quality control, and decentralized information gathering and diffusion. These four elements reflect the evolution of the system from its primary function targeting pure development-oriented prospects through awareness raising and training on production techniques to new functions targeting developmentand market-oriented and food security purposes.That shift has become compulsory when in 2004, as a result of the Africa Rice / Japan NERICA / CBSS-funded project; the farmer association COPROCOVIDA (Coopérative de Commercialisation des Produits Vivriers de Daloa) was unable to sell important stocks of seeds (600 tonnes of NERICA rice and 200 tonnes of maize of Acceptable Quality Seed). This situation has brought to mind that the implementation of the NERICA/CBSS project has boosted the productions of seeds, but has also created new problems for farmers who were not used to condition, store, and commercialize such large quantities of seeds. Moreover, the farmers had regularly to look for insecticides and to pay for missions of the national seed services (NSSs) whenever governmentfunded projects wanted to buy seed.This is an important step towards the recognition of farmers' role in the supply of seeds, the in-situ conservation of the agro-biodiversity and crop genetic diversity, farmers' knowledge and farmers' rights. This will also bring plant breeders and farmers together to work more closely in variety development, variety evaluation, and variety release. As mentioned by Haugerud and Collinson (1990), apart from yield, farmers like grain quality, storability, suitability for intercropping, and the use and value of crop residues. These criteria may all influence their decisions about variety adoption. By adapting rules and regulations to local realities, policy makers will be helped to better consider the importance of the identification of farmers' needs, on-farm seed production and exchange, and the maintenance, development and registration of local varieties and landraces. Indeed, small-scale farmers perceive local varieties and landraces to be more adaptable to their agro-ecology, give stable yield, perform better under low soil fertility or low inputs, have good grain quality and are suitable for preparation of traditional foods (Bishaw, 2004).The development of a policy framework which favors the recognition of local traditional seed systems alongside with the formal one will surely be beneficial for all stakeholders while targeting food security and sustainability of agricultural systems.As related in -The CBSS Technician's Manual‖, Bèye et al. (2009) raised the question of specialization of individual farmers and farmers' associations in the production of quality seed. This will likely occur through: (i) The establishment of strong farmer groups which are capable of organizing seed production and seed commercialization activities including seed production planning, collecting and storing; (ii) The promotion of the quality seed of selected varieties for their specific characteristics; (iii) Working to increase resilience of farms, amongst other means by stimulating diversification of revenues and agro-biodiversity; and (iv) Connecting farmers to providers of inputs and credit.Enterprise development is also meant to strengthen farmers' organizational capacities and to help them become -seed enterprises‖. Enterprises are expected to work in close collaboration with other stakeholders mainly public-private institutions on common social, economic, and environmental issues in a stimulating and enabling environment.The concept of decentralized seed quality control is not new. It has been used with success in Western Africa, in Senegal and Côte d'Ivoire, and in Eastern and Southern Africa in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe.In Senegal for example, Authorized Technicians (ATs) assist Inspectors and Regional Seed Officers by monitoring most declared seed fields. These are private agents who are trained to conduct field inspections. For Bèye and Wopereis 23 about 10 years, field inspections have been conducted in the Senegal River Valley by private agents for 60 USD per hectare per cropping season. In this way, seed producers from UNIS (Union Nationale Interprofessionnelle des Semences) are able to produce annually around 2500 tonnes of certified seed which is enough to cover more than 50% of local seed needs in the irrigated zones of the River Senegal and Anambe. The remaining seed is sold in Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, and The Gambia.In the case of CBSS, the seed quality control is totally decentralized. It is run by individual farmers and farmers' groups who are trained to produce quality seed. These farmers and farmers' groups are monitored by Quality Control Farmers (QCFs) and ATs who are trained and accredited by the NSS (where it is functioning) or the Directions of agriculture. QCFs monitor the traceability of the seed and conduct seed quality controls for three parameters: physical purity, germination rate and moisture content. This work benefits from support from ATs and supervision at distance from the NSS. All the collected information, after verification by the leaders of the farmers' associations, is sent by smartphone to the central website: www.semence.org.CBSS enables smallholder farmers to meet their seed requirements by improving their know-how for addressing basic seed production practices and the quality maintenance constraints. Consequently, it provides a good opportunity for farmers' organizations to improve the supply of quality seeds in their communities and to gradually develop into viable seed enterprises. Market aspects are monitored and promoted through cyber-seed centers which at any time give information including details of available seed stocks and their characteristics (germination rate, moisture content, physical purity, and, in some cases, the presence of weed seeds), and the proposed prices and trends of productions by variety (Bèye, 2008).A key element to improving agricultural production is the timely provision of accurate information in response to requests made by end-users of agricultural information (inputs, agricultural products).A number of initiatives have come up to address this problem such as the provision of market information system, agricultural advisory services, rural radio, and village phones. These initiatives provide farmers with agricultural information but in most cases they are not easily accessible by farmers to meet their specific information needs. Especially for seed issues, they are not well adapted. Therefore, new tools were elaborated based on the work done by QCFs through a decentralized data gathering system called the -Cyber- seed network‖ (Figures 6 and 7).The major challenge is in making the appropriate information broadly available to farmers through the multitude of national and NGO programs in a form whereby they can absorb the most relevant elements into their own practices. The creation of Internet access centers in a cyber-seed network can help farmers and seed suppliers to communicate with traders outside of their immediate surroundings (Bèye, 2008). This goes in parallel with available other existing marketing and information tools.Nowadays, most farmers continue to manage and use a portfolio of varieties, often both local landraces and modern varieties.Local landraces continue to play a crucial role in many farming systems for two major reasons (Support for the Informal Seed Sector in Development, 2000):1. The seed of landraces is readily available, and 2. Landraces are usually adapted to the local growing conditions, the low-input cultivation practices, and the needs of the farm.Cyber-seed centers give relevant information about landraces and their importance for the communities (e.g. diversity of ecosystems, low-input systems, adaptation to the changing environment, disease resistance, health preservation, and nutritional elements).CBSS is used in many African countries as a solution to the lack of quality seed. However, often technicians from government and project-funded programs do not leave the system to run by itself. They focus on technical aspects of the seed production such as the respect of isolation norms, roguing of off-types, cultural practices. Organizational, commercial and institutional aspects that can favor the development of formal well-structured enterprises are not taken into account. In particular, the reinforcement of farmers' capacity building at the grassroots levels and social traditional aspects are neglected.Recognizing farmers' contribution can help upgrade the quality and the diversity of seed produced on-farm for onfarm use by individual farmers. Of course this will need adaptation of seed rules and regulations to local needs (Bèye, 2000;Bèye et al., 2009). The cases of Côte d'Ivoire and Senegal where the involvement of teams of ATs and QCFs in monitoring the quality of the seed are accepted represent good examples that need to be better explored. On that issue, Cromwell et al. (1993) call for the promotion of farmer-level seed production and the support of farmer-to-farmer seed exchange mechanisms.Several initiatives were also tested in Europe through the organization in networks like the -Réseau Semences Paysannes‖ in France and the -Rete Semi Rurali‖ in Italy (Bocci and Chable, 2009). Their members are farmers, consumers, and scientists working together in order to reconsider the scientific, technical, and legal aspects of seed production by establishing links between varieties with the terroir defined by its soil, its climate, its people, and their history.Starting from 1998, the European Union, concerned at the loss of agricultural biodiversity, proposed a new directive (98/95/EC) in which they envisaged the possibility of cultivating, exchanging, and selling varieties in danger of genetic erosion, known as ‗conservation varieties', as well as varieties adapted to organic agriculture, and mixtures of species and varieties. These new approaches will surely influence the development of the seed strategic models.Seed systems are run by using seed strategic models. The models are built based upon the roles of the different partners involved in the seed value chain and their knowhow but also the value chain orientation. In general, five strategic seed models are identified:(i) The seed sector is state-managed. (ii) The seed sector is run by research and extension institutions. (iii) The seed sector is run by private companies. (iv) The seed sector is run by smallholder farmers. (v) The seed sector is run by small-scale seed Bèye and Wopereis 25 enterprises.The seed sector is state-managed. Government interventions in the seed sector are favored mainly by the lack of a solid and well-organized private sector. The sector is usually subsidized at all levels (e.g. production, processing, certification, distribution). The focus on distribution, as opposed to marketing, does not facilitate the development of the seed sector. However, these interventions are worthwhile for a nascent seed sector and especially in countries emerging from civil wars or after disasters due to climatic catastrophes (e.g. droughts, flooding).The seed sector is run by research and extension institutions. This is a research-led approach. It makes seed of improved varieties available at farmers' level directly from plant-breeding plots through the production of Breeder and Foundation seeds. Through this approach, the whole seed system is controlled by the research and extension institutions. Local production and diffusion techniques are used (Jarvis et al., 2000). NSSs monitor seed production fields and seed stocks by spot-checking. Release aspects may face difficulties but can be improved during the experimental trials if participatory approaches (participatory varietal selection [PVS], on-farm field trials, demonstrations) are used efficiently by involving major partners (national seed and phytosanitary services), and end-users (farmers and the private sector).This model is used in all cotton-growing countries in Western and Central Africa. The model is interesting as it ensures a regular provision of Breeder and Foundation seeds and in some cases. Registered seeds are also covered. The approach can be used as a transitory mechanism (until the emergence of appropriate seed systems) if seed certification mechanisms are implemented especially at levels of Foundation and, sometimes, Registered seed.The seed sector is run by private companies. The model targets the development of a modern seed industry to African farmers through the development of national and regional competitive seed industries.As stated earlier, there are more and more seed companies that are interested in working on rice. In the past, these companies focused mainly on maize and sorghum hybrids and vegetables. Now, the situation for rice is improving because of the high demand for quality seed at national and regional levels. The harmonized rules and regulations in West and South Africa offer opportunities for the regionalization of the seed industries and the markets. ECOWAS and SADC regulations open a new avenue for variety release and seed trading in West Africa and South Africa.Harmonized seed laws will likely facilitate cross-border movement of seeds and provide a broader market for seed enterprises. It will also play a key role in seed security if space is opened to farmers who can then save, use, and market their seeds.The development of hybrid varieties may well open new areas of fruitful collaboration with smallholder farmers. It is expected that private companies will play a leadership role in the sector and will, at the same time, help to better structure seed production and quality control activities, operations related to information and marketing and food security.The seed sector is run by smallholder farmers. This is the case of local traditional seed systems, run by farmers themselves and partners that produce and market seeds, without direct control by government institutions that regulate commerce or seed activities. It is flexible and efficient for the diffusion of genetic materials.The model was extensively used by many NGOs and development agencies at the end of the 1990s. Several initiatives were undertaken including the provision of quality seed, fertilizers, and pesticides. Farmers' groups were also created. However, initiatives stopped at the end of projects. It seems that the real constraints of the model were not well addressed. In fact, few studies are conducted to understand how to improve the functioning of the model, which is more development-oriented than market-oriented. Social, cultural, and historical aspects should also be taken into account.The seed sector is run by small-scale enterprises. The provision of Breeder seed is part of the mission of centers' breeders -AfricaRice and National Agricultural Research Systems (NARS). However, NARS should be able to produce Foundation seed on request if they have sufficient financial resources and if regulatory procedures are respected (e.g. quality control and seed certification). In this case, they should make sure that the varieties are released according to the National or Regional regulatory procedures (harmonized rules and regulations are effective in West and East Africa).It is noted that in most SSA countries there is no functioning seed release board. In this case, it is recommended that the stakeholders (including farmers, Net J Agric Sci 26 the private sector, and technicians from the NSS) involved in the PVS and on-farm trials should give approval for the release and the diffusion of the selected varieties after submission of the passport data of the varieties by the research institutes. Both conventional and community-based seed systems can be used under this model for the provision of certified Foundation seed by research institutes and -Controlled‖ or -Seed of Acceptable Quality‖ seeds by small-scale enterprises. The approach offers good opportunities for smallholder farmers to get access to quality seed produced locally but also, to become better organized through the development of small-scale rural enterprises.Rural enterprises are close to farmers and can help them to play a more consistent role in food security and in the preservation of the agro-biodiversity.Agro-biodiversity provides a source of diverse materials that can help communities better face changing climatic conditions with their influence on the growth of (new) crop pests and diseases, soil erosion, changing market conditions, and increasing population pressure.The five strategic seed models are all useful and can be implemented solely or in combination, depending on many factors that take into account the complexity of production/farming systems, the policy environment, socio-cultural aspects and market opportunities.In countries where the seed sector is in the infant stage (as in most of the Central African Republic, Chad and countries recovering from recent civil wars -Liberia, Somalia, Sierra Leone, South Sudan), emphasis should be put on interventions from the governments targeting the development-oriented value chain (Model I).In countries where the farming systems are characterized by multiple cropping and intra-crop diversity (many rice varieties in the same plot combined with other crops) and the use of farmer-saved seed due to the self-pollination characteristic of rice, models I, II and III seem to be more appropriate. In particular, in rainfed ecosystems, integrated seed systems should be promoted. As stated by the USAID 4 study on seed value chain (USAID Economic Growth Project /Senegal, 2009), in such systems the added value is low, and it is preferable to first target the strengthening of local seed systems by empowering technical, organizational, and managerial capacities of smallholder farmers. Model IV also seems here appropriate as it promotes the leadership of the smallholder farmers. Successful results were obtained through this model in Burkina Faso and Mali for the production of maize seed.In areas with high irrigation potential and where real economic profits can be made in the rice value chain, model V promoting private seed companies can be explored (South Africa, Nigeria, Uganda, and Kenya). In those areas, focus should also be put on the development of the traceability, and market and information skills.Whatever happens, countries should be careful in not looking at the seed systems as business tools only but rather as vehicles of civilization integrating the past and the present of a selected community at different levels (scientific, historical, social, cultural and economic).Seed should be seen as a product of the civilization which is destined to ensure food security, the sustainability of agricultural systems and the enhancement of biodiversity. That means seed strategies should be designed to be central to farming systems rather than the simply adding value (Bèye et al., 2013).Seed systems should offer a range of possibilities that aim at making farmer seed available at the community level while conserving agro-biodiversity and promoting rural innovations that are in phase with socio-cultural dimensions.In the case of CBSS, seed systems are first analyzed at the grassroots level. From there, seed systems are built based upon the improvement of the local farming systems, the exploitation of modern as well as local traditional varieties, the reinforcement of traditional seed diffusion networks and their linkages to the terroir.The concept of terroir embraces different components that give value to the seed at different levels (agricultural, environmental, nutritional, historical, social, cultural and economic) and its role within the communities. This is not easy to capitalize but researchers should know that the sustainability of the seed systems depends on the level of integration between all these components. This, of course, goes beyond the seed value chain, which looks mainly at the economic and financial profitability and at the risks foreseen.The African community should realize that seed systems can be built only through a long process endowed with conducive policy and appropriate delivery mechanisms.The recent 2008 food crisis has led the international community via the Governing Body of the ITPGR to encourage countries to remove barriers to the saving, exchange or selling of seed by directly supporting farmers' seed systems. The African Union for its part has developed an African Model of Law which aims to protect breeders and, at the same time, farmers' rights.These initiatives are reminiscent of those taken by India in 2001 through the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Act which gives possibilities of protecting plant varieties while enabling farmers to save, re-sow, Bèye and Wopereis 27 exchange, and sell new plant varieties developed by farmers and breeders. The case of India is interesting as it favors: (i) close collaboration between farmers and breeders; (ii) the development of participatory approaches (participatory varietal selection -PVS, participatory plant breeding -PPB) and (iii) the release of varieties coming from these approaches. After more than 50 years of trial and error, perhaps it is now time to go for -crash programs‖ that will allow farmers to have access to quality seed. It is observed that in Europe as well as in Asia, the development of the seed sector was enabled first by a strong commitment of governments through adequate policies including subsidies, credits, and markets. It is obvious that for a crop such as rice, which is self-pollinated and easily reproducible, the development of the African seed sector will definitely need assistance from governments and the recognition of locally produced seed.It is clear that farmer-saved seed and farmer-to-farmer seed exchange will remain the primary source of seed supply for the majority of farmers for many years. According to Bay (1997), farm-saved seed is a common feature of agricultural systems worldwide, particularly in self-pollinated crops and/or those systems where hybrids are not used. He estimated that in the mid-1980s, more than 35% of seeds planted were farm-saved (in the USA, for example, about 75% of seeds of self-pollinated crops like wheat, barley, and oats were farm-saved, while in Europe similar figures could be found).Referring to the complexity of the issue that will need flexible seed policies, it is recommended that a transition period of 5 to 10 years should be observed. That period will be used to:1. Learn more about: (i) Local farming systems and their adaptation in this challenging climate change environment; (ii) Farmers' seeds and their role in ensuring food security and enhance the agro-biodiversity in SSA; (iii) Impact of international rules and regulations on the development of the seed sector in SSA; and (iv) What the threats to the lack of room for farmers to produce, multiply, use, exchange, and sell the seeds of plants cultivated in their own fields are. 2. Build fundamentals of sustainable seed systems through: (i) The structuring of the seed sector and the creation of appropriate conditions for incorporating local indigenous knowledge into the national regulations. It is disappointing that farmers' rights are not taken into account in SSA; (ii) Reinforce traditional seed diffusion mechanisms in small farmer communities (Cromwell, 1990); (iii) Create conditions for all the interested private operators to develop seed industries that respect farmers' rights including the rights to cultivate and sell their own local varieties enriching by the same time the agrobiodiversity; (iv) Ensure the foundation of food sovereignty.At the end, the most important action is to reinforce the capacities of the small-scale farming systems to become stronger and sustainable. That means more diversified production, more biodiversity, and more income at community level but also, more employment of young boys and women in the rural areas and in the long run, the establishment of food sovereignty though the autonomy of the local seed systems.The autonomy of the local seed systems will likely offer to the communities the possibility of self-regulation, through the progressive adjustment of cultivation practices to different regions and to climatic variations.Autonomy will also allow the adaptation of the cultivated biodiversity to socio-economic and cultural changes, and to the needs of the human society that tends to it (de la Perrière and Kastel, 2011). It will help to break the barriers between the different seed systems while facilitating the appropriation by farmers of the best technologies for themselves and their communities. A better comprehension of sociological, ethnographic, humanistic (gender, ethnicity and history), environmental, and economic aspects of seed issues will be fundamental to shape appropriate seed systems targeting sustainability of the farming systems and food sovereignty."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1054525194.json b/main/part_2/1054525194.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bdad39e6ceeafbec871989009af2613ae5b36716 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1054525194.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"84a10e15869a85fcee8d42f02f88a25b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/214a76f1-5465-4259-81b2-d391fbe5c048/retrieve","id":"-88461814"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"097706d6-f68c-4b9b-9de6-db3b01270042","content":"• Innovation: New, improved or adapted outputs or groups of outputs such as products, technologies, services and institutional arrangements with high potential to contribute to positive impacts when used at scale.• Innovation Packages: Combinations of interrelated innovations and enabling conditions that, together, can lead to transformation and impact at scale in a specific context.• Scaling Readiness: Metric that combines single or average innovation readiness and innovation use scores at innovation package or portfolio level.• Profile all CGIAR innovations developed under the pooled portfolio Self-directed survey tool that collects info on:• Innovation (name, description, type, etc)• Geofocus (country)• Lead and contributing Initiative(s)• Partnerships• Impacts (Impact Areas and SDGs)• (Changes in) Innovation ReadinessWill act as the baseline, and annual follow up surveys will enable track progress over time• Innovation Readiness:• Builds on NASA technology readiness levels (TRL)• Broadened to \"innovation\" readiness to capture the nontechnological innovations that R&D organizations work on (e.g. policy, capacity and business model solutions) • Focusses on assessing the development/ maturity stage of an innovation (is the innovation is proven to work?) • 0-9 levels ranging from Idea to Proven Innovation • Going from 0->2 is just as important as going from 7->9 T h e in n o v a tio n is v a lid a te d fo r its a b ility to achieve a s pecif ic im p act u n der s em i-con trolled con dition sT h e in n o v a tio n is b e in g te s te d fo r its a b ility to achieve a s pecif ic im p act u n der s em i-con trolled con dition sT h e in n o v a tio n is v a lid a te d fo r its a b ility to achieve a s pecif ic im p act u n der fully-con trolled con dition sT h e in n o v a tio n is b e in g te s te d fo r its a b ility to achieve a s pecif ic im p act u n der fully-con trolled con dition s De t e r mi ne t h e l e v e l t h a t b e st f i t s t h e c u rr e nt r e a d in e s s o r ma t u r i t y st a g e of t h e innovation.Read the innovation readiness level descriptions. • Innovation Use:• Moves away from simplistic more=better thinking • Applies a network approach to measure diffusion of the innovation in the agricultural innovation system (who is using the innovation?) • 0-9 levels ranging from No use to Common use by beneficiary • Only for packages with (for example) scaling readiness of >36 or high scalability potential• Prioritization at the Innovation Package level around the \"lowest staves in the barrel\" (bottlenecks)• Fit-for-purpose partnerships and (co-)investment to overcome strategic bottlenecks• Baseline for MEL and adaptive management• Monitor whether investments and partnerships have led to increased scaling readiness"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1071325808.json b/main/part_2/1071325808.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..deaad09509e252a1b5f6b8d2aabc8de08a1271d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1071325808.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"63ade09fea66146c4d2ecc76fcab4518","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/dc46e287-7aa9-4b47-9add-b76baf632e9b/retrieve","id":"-64896564"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e6fddd0f-0d3c-402c-bbc3-3141d0fdd834","content":"community-based capacity for managing technological innovation in agriculture, and that this will be a very significant output of the project.CIA T expects that farroer participation will improve access to new technology for an estimated 1,600-3,200 farro families during the life of the project. Improved welfare of small farroers and farro communities will result from direct food and income benefits generated by adoption of locally-adapted technology.El¡pected outcmnes of the ProjectThe overall goal of this project is to improve the welfare of small farmers in poor rural communities by institutionalizing their active role, through participatory methods, in generating appropriate agricultura! technology for their community.The development of local leadership for farmer participation in agricultura! technology development requires the project to build skills, experience and confidence among a1l participants in arder for farmers to be recognized by the scientific community as . capable partners in adaptive technology testing.Implementing participatory methods for adaptive technology testing at the community leve! will generate documented experience and systematic methodology which the project • distills into training materials. These materials are the basis for disseminating and multiplying the approach.Another outcome of this project is the implementation of a community-based organizational strategy for farmer participation in adaptive technology testing, involving the creation of farmers' local agricultura! research committees. Setting up sustainable farmer committees for adaptive research in rural committees requires the project to construct a completely new methodology for the organizational model or \"blueprint\" for farmers' committees.This organizational model could be called a social technology which the project is developing. As such the organizational model can be (and indeed already is being) adopted by other institutions. Experience is suggesting that the organizational model is the indispensable or necessary condition for building a truly participatory and sustainableThe project proposed to create up to six farmers Local Agricultura! Research Comrnittees (Comités de Investigación Agricola Local-CIAL) in each of three types of institutional setting: informal groups !inked with NGO's; in local government structure; and in local farmer associations or cooperatives.Six CIAL were initiated in member associations of a regional farmers' marketing organization, CORMAC, sponsored by the Coffee Growers Federation. Of these, two comrnittees did not continue because there was friction in the communities over control of the comrnittee. However, three other associations of CORMAC have since requested CIAL Five CIAL were proposed in informal groups of agricultura! NGO's. The regional development NGO, CORPOTUNIA, sponsored by the Carvajal Foundation of Cali (Colombia) set up a new program cal!ed \"Programa CIAL\" in mid-1991. lt undertook the formation of eight CIAL together with the project.In the local government setting the project has encountered complete resistance by farmers to the idea of linking their community CIAL to local government. lntead farmers want to form their own associations, and to sponsor a CIAL as a nuc!eus of this effort. The project formed CIAL with five communities on this basis, with an understanding with the Carvajal Foundation that the \"Programa CIAL\" might take on these CIAL if the communities so wish. It appears that this is not an auspicious time to test the CIAL with local government in the pi!ot site, and that this situation is not like!y to change in the short run. The first stage ClAL worked on their own initiative and with project staff to develop a set of statutes. Functions and responsibilities for each of four committee members were elaborated: the leader, secretaiy, treasurer and extensionist. A mechanism for accountability and community control was established. We recognized that for the CIAL to depend one hundred percent on farmers' voluntarism was not viable, when key research activities such as planting and hiuvesting come at peak times of labor demand.The principies of a small (US $500) fund for each ClAL were therefore elaborated.With the establishment of a fund, the opportunity to link the CIAL with development of financia! management, cost control, and entrepreneurial skills for farmers became apparent.Farmers became enthusiastic about making their fund grow and decided to reinvest profits from experiments in the fund. With the Carvajal Foundation \"Programa CIAL\", the project is defining further principies for a self-sustaining fund which will be managed by a joint committee of ClAL representatives in the \"Programa CIAL\"The CIAL has progressed as a concept and in reality from a group of volunteers who meet to participate in an experiment for evaluating agricultura! technology, to something different. Perhaps the CIAL might evolve to look like a small enterprise that finances itself from doing technology testing for the community. While this is still a hypothesis (or a vision) which has yet to be fully formulated, and proven, this year's work has laid the foundation for this type of development.actiyities of the CIAL: participatozy technoloc;y testingOnce the ~st CIAL had debated and accepted the organization and statutes for the CIAL they drew up with the project, they began the first of six steps in participatory methodology. NGO staff supported by the project personnel visited each CIAL every two weeks from diagnosis to planting, monitoring, analysis of results and their verbal report to their cominunity. Similar work began with the second wave of CIAL which planted their experiments in September, 1991.A farmer-designed seed production stratec;y for beansIn the previous phase of this project, farmers participated in the selection of improved varieties, showing the importance of including their criteria in the breeding process. In the pilot area, farmers identified severa! varieties which they began to multiply for seed and produce on a comercial scale, new to small farmers in the area. In November 1991 the variety PV A 773, selected and multiplied by the farmers' seed business, SemillasPescadoL was released by ICA AS \"ICA Caucayá.\"In response to the seasonal difficulties of marketing beans as grain, a group of farmers who had been participating in the varietal selections, decided to experiment with producing beans for seed.The project continues to facilitate the participatory decision-making of this group of seven farmers in evaluating and adapting seed production technology, methods and machinery to their needs and resources. This activity is described in more detail in Roa et al, 1991. Table 2 shows the volume of seed and number of farmers supplied in 1990-91. The farmers' seed production has been a seminal experience for the project because their experience showed us the tremendous importance of generating organizational and business management skills in connection with participatory research. In addition to participatory technology evaluation with seed producers the project meets regularly with them to monitor costs, marketing strategy, production planning and the decisions involved in the gradual creation of a small business enterprise.Towards the end of the last phase the Carvajal Foundation set up a marketing• experiment with the project to assess whether small farmers could sell poor quality beans that middlemen would often not accept except at a discount price. Farmers and their families selected and bagged in 1 lb bags 1.5 tons of dry beans which were rapidly sold in poor urban neighborhoods at the beginning of the harvest season. However once a glut of beans arrived on the market, poor consumers could buy the better quality beans at a lower price; the small farmers' inferior quality beans could not be so readily sold; and farmers had to wait severa! weeks to realize a sale. In addition the selection and bagging of grains required more labor at a peak season of hard work. Farmers decided it was not worth the extra work given the slow sales, and now only sell to the experimental marketing outlet when they can get a quick sale.One conclusion of this experiment was that a storage technology is required, but farmers are sceptical, expecting that the beans will lose color, weight and appeal to the consumer if stored. A second conclusion of the project was the need for a marketing organization to realize the benefits of new technology for small farmers. The CIAL, like the seed producers group, can be expected to have a significant effect on the demand for new technology and so on increasing production. But small farmers must have sorne channels for selling their product which allow them to be price-makers, not just price-takers, as is the case at present with beans. (1991).The project continues to con tribute to CIA T courses in which participatory methods have become a regular feature (see Table 3).A field training-action program was carried out in June-July of 1990 at the request of the NGO FUNDAEC (the Foundation of the Application and Teaching of Science) to evaluate their 5-year cropping system trials and orient their staff in IPRA methodology.CEI.ATER (a networking NGO) organized a course with IPRA to introduce participatory methodology to agricultura! NGO's working in the Cauca area of Colombia.In July a training action program was set up with the \"Programa CIAL\", Corpotun1a, Carvajal Foundation, which meets every two weeks for 2 days (1 theory, 1 practice).Support to Kellogg-Funded Cassava Project, Brazil.The project associate visited this project for two weeks in May. She taught a workshop on participatory methods for participants in the Kellogg-funded project, who Tralnfng strategy ard trafnlng materfals (!LEJA). Seed Systems for Small Farmers they fonnulate recommendations they wish to give to the community. These verbal reports are given by the CIAL to the community, with project observers.lt is too soon to say how the CIAL will irnpact on technology adoption or incomes.However, significant progress in this area has been achieved by the seed producers (who function A a CIAL specialized in seed).The Farmer participation has also stimulated the developrnent of appropriate rnachinery for small bean producers. A prototype thresher developed with Semillas Pescador and farmers in their area, is being sold in increasing numbers.The seed producers are now providing training to other farmers in bean production practices. This multiplier effect, put in place by the project, is increasing the demand for seed and the production of beans, rnaking the process sustainable without project intervention. However, the development of organized marketing channels will be critical to long-tenn viabili ty of this effort. A participatory diagnosis is a group analysis of a situation. It is designed to elucidate local knowledge and perceptions in a systematic way through group dynamics, so that the group improves its understanding of the situation. The results also help outsiders (who are not members of the group or community) to obtain a rapid appreciation of how the group perceives a given situation or topic, since the whole exercise takes from three to eight hours.The participatory diagnosis of soil conservation involved a group of thirteen farmers from eight different veredas in Caldono municipio in north Cauca. Farmers with small holdings (less than 10 ha) were invited to attend if they felt erosion and soil conservation was of interest to them. This was therefore, a self-selected group of farmers with an established concem with soil conservation. The objectives of the group analysis were defined by research and extension staff as follows: to explore how farmers saw the issue of soil erosion and conservation in the framework of the history of the area; to seek farmers suggestions about possible ways to control erosion; to present sorne proposals for erosion control practices (using drawings) and to invite their suggestions for changes to the proposed practices.Hlstorlcal Analysis: Farmers recalled that their latid was once more fertile and they did not need to use fertilizers. There was more woodland, more sources of water, and the rainy season was more clearly differentiated from the dry season. These days, they commented, after three crops the soil is powdery, the black topsoil has washed away. But they continue to plant cassava because it resists drought.Proposecl solutions: When solutions to the soil fertility problem were discussed by farmers in small groups, they mentioned that live contour barriers, and run-off channels were recommended for erosion control. However, farmers suggested new crop rotations, intercropping (beans with cassava); planting pastures with citrus fruit trees on steep slopes; planting pineapple in barriers; making stone barriers every 10-20 metres, as altematives they would like to try.The following suggestions were obtained when farmers reacted to drawings of different types of live contour barriers for soil erosion control in • cassava plots:for conserving relatively fertile soils, contour barriers of coffee bushes with fruit trees in between; live barriers of sugar cane were criticised because cane required fertilization in their soils.the women especially liked the idea of two rows of pineapple planted every 10-20 m., because they expected to get something to sell and not to fertilize the pineapple.Also it would not shade other crops.barriers of pasture (Brachiaria decumbens) were perceived as having potential for establishing pastures after the prior crop.farmers without cattle rejected the barriers of pasture grass because it was too invasive, and too much work to control.live barriers of cut-and-carry forage grasses were liked better than pasture grass ( especially Telembi}.farmers wanted to grow a hlgher value crop than cassava in plots where barriers were established, eg. beans or coffee.In snmmary the participatory diagnosis showed that a self-selected group of farmers recognized erosion as a problem, were informed about the technology available for soil conservation, and had a variety of ideas to propase for experimentation. None, however were actually implementing any of these ideas on their own initiative. Farmers' critiqued proposals for contour-skrip barriers in terms of the utility of the barriers' product, rather than its effectiveness in controling erosion. Another important criterion for farmers was the amount of work involved in maintaining, or controling the barrier. Finally, farmers were interested in the use of live barriers to conserve their more fertile soils (where beans could be grown or coffee could be established}, and the possibility of changing to a different cropping system or rotation, as an altemative to cassava, if live barriers were established.The survey questionnaire was administered to twenty-two farmers currently using soil conservation tecbniques. The respondents were purposively selected, and are the entire Farmers were first asked which farming problems they think are important, to assess the extent to which they spontaneously identify erosion among these. The interviewers were unknown to the farmers and the interviewer's purpose was not explained as connected with erosion, so there was no reason for farmers to expect this topic to be one of special interest.Although only four out of the twenty-two farmers using conservation practices identified erosion as one of their problems (Table 1) soil fertility was mentioned more frequently.However it appears that farmers perceive problems like lack of water and pests and diseases as more pressing concerns than erosion. The questionnaire asked each farmer to explain what the word \"erosion\" meant to him or her. Responses, shown in Table 3, demonstrate that most farmers were able to express the idea that erosion involves physicalloss of soil and affects fertility. When asked \"Does erosion have any importance for you,\" most farmers conveyed their sense that the loss of soil and declining fertility was a significant phenomenon for them (Table 4). lt is clear from farmers' assessments of the different practices on their plots, that they understood the purpose of these practices. For example the purpose of live contour barriers of forage grass a commonly established practice, was readily explained in terms of reducing soil loss, and building up soil behind the barrier (Table 5). The open-ended evaluation of this practice by farmers showed that there were mixed experiences: sorne found it easy to manage; others had difficulties in keeping on top of the need to cut regularly. Most comments on another type of live barrier were positive, but also related to the management aspects and the utility of the grass, rather than its effect on soilloss or fertility.Although these farmers understand the concept of erosion and the soil conservation function of the practices established on their plots, and although their evaluation of the practices is by no means negative, there is no evidence that these farmers are spontaneously undertaking soil conservation on their own initiative. The farmers interviewed constitute the entire population of users of soil conservation practices in the area studied; only two farmers (out of twenty-two) have a plot with a soil conservation practice established without either credit or extension assistance. However, nineteen plots are receiving technical assistance without credit, mostly those established upwards of two years ago.There are several possible explanations for this lack of spontaneous adoption, which were explored with key informant farmers after the survey was completed. One explanation is that the conservation practices are perceived by farmers as impossible to replicate without technical assistance, because laying out the contour strip seems complicated. Another explanation is that farmers don't consider that the benefits of the practices are worth the extra work involved. A third possible explanation is that because the extension strategy is aimed at recuperating badly-eroded plots, and at cassava plots (normally the least fertile on the farm), farmers see these soil erosion control practices as purely remedial.The participatory diagnosis discussed earlier, showed that fanners' preferences were to implement soil conservation practices on relatively fertile plots, with the hope that soil erosion control would help them to \"graduate\" to a higher-value crop (requring better fertility conditions) than cassava Perhaps the extension strategy aimed at recuperating badly-eroded soil or conserving less-fertile soils is not fomenting spontaneous adoption because it is out of step with these fanners' preferences. It may be that the recommended practices need to be redesigned by researchers, to include a more aggressive strategy for short-run improvement of fertility on a plot, enabling the farmer to upgrade bis or her cropping system, and so justify the additional work involved in maintaining the soil conservation practices.These are hypothesis, not recommendations. But they do suggest the need for to understand fanners' objectives and to develop strategies which are congruent with farmers perceptions and preferences, when designing soil conservation practices.A preliminary test was made of the hypothesis arising from the participatory diagnosis, that fanners' strategy is to use soil conservation methods to improve relatively more fertile plots, so as to shift to an alternative, higher value crop. Five fanners who volunteered to take part in trials of live contour barriers, were invited to choose the materials to be used in the barriers, the size and number of barriers, and the plots where these were to be located. After a visit to experimental trials where they viewed and discussed the array of conservation practices available, the fanners made the choices shown in Table 9. All farmers decided that they would establish soil conservation practices on plots where they plan to, or are already establishing coffee. Coffee is the cash crop with a secure market, and thus their \"premium\" crop which occupies their most fertile plots. All farmers except one decided to conserve soil on plots where they could intercrop beans, an indicator of relatively better fertility (compared to cassava plots). The farmer who chose establish soil conservation practices on a fallow plot which had had five successive cassava crops taken on it, decided to combine the live barriers with heavy fertilization at bis own expense, in order to upgrade the plot rapidly. This very preliminary test of small farmers' What is the pux:pose of this practice?\"To stop the soil from washing away.\"''The soil builds up in the barrier, it doesn't wash away down below.\"\"lt ~eeps the soil and it's used to feed the cattle\" \"lt slows down the water running off the plot\" Source: Survey of 22 users, 1991. \"What adyantages or disadvamages has this practice?\" Imperial grass is not so fuzzy (unpleasant to cut) and doesn't grow too fast.Imperial is not so tough for the cattle to eat.Even after three or four cuttings it grows back and is always green.If y9u don't have animals you can sell it.You can sell the seed at Col $10.000 a sack.Imperial is easy to manage.It spreads a lot of seed which you have to keep weeding.If you cut it too late, then the animals won't eat it.If you let it flower then you have to cut it up with machete ( difficult to cut and for the animals to eat it).It needs a lot of work (to take care of it).After 1 cut it eight times, 1 had to replace it, it was finished by too much cutting.Source: Survey of 22 users, 1991. • What is its purpose?\"To protect the soil from eroding, so that the soil doesn't wash away with the water in heavily fainfall\" \"So that the rain doesn't wash away the seed\" \"Coptains the erosion, so that the soil can recuperate\" \"After planting (the barrier) in a cassava plot you can leave it to establish a pasture\"What adyantªces or disªdvantªces ha.s jt?\"You are cóllecting the soil available to establish apasture more quickly.You can get (vegetative) seed from the barrier.Its useful to feed the cattle.Uve barriers are more useful tan bamboo ones.You have to keep cutting it although you can take the cattle (to the barrier) to graze it before planting another crop in that plot.Source: Survey of 22 users, 1991.Table 8 Relationship between credit, agricultura! extension and the length of time soil conservation practices were used by farmers. Three municipios, north Cauca, Colombia, 1991. • 29 "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1076228666.json b/main/part_2/1076228666.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..17b8f55156f68f37a224c98a95c876db10c3cd29 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1076228666.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7dc6ad86f10993dda7c04580c4dad705","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/9c944c68-92de-41e1-a81b-0c1842e07f21/content","id":"1849015343"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"94db9f44-8473-4d09-91df-2a7cf4d21bdf","content":"It sets out simple suggestions for making sure women and menincluding youth, persons with disabilities, and other marginalized groups:• feel wanted and included in training events, • are fully informed about technological, production, or process options, • learn effectively, and • have the confidence to implement what they have learned.Over time, both women and men should be able to build on the training to innovate by themselves in response to changes in the wider environment and their specific resources and needs.Good training events need more than great content. How you train is vitally important.It is essential that both women and men are able to speak their minds and have opportunities to shape the training event for their own requirements.As future farmers, the needs of young women and men in farming households need special attention in order to encourage those interested to stay in the sector.The training is just the beginning. The key thing is that participants adopt and work with the new ideas, practices and technologies.• As part of the technical refresher, ask your participants how they have been adopting and adapting the technologies you trained them on. Have there been any special issues facing women, youth, and other target groups? What can be done about them? • Building in interactive discussions on these processes will help improve your own training events and make them even more technologically and socially relevant.• Recognized community level experts, such as older women, may be trained to mentor/coach younger women, for example, on the technologies.• Develop case studies or life stories of the adoption process to build into future training courses. Make sure these are anonymized. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1108471102.json b/main/part_2/1108471102.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5924e3f0967a5769101a1cb9ce0b3f6048f88639 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1108471102.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"11e31554e9e887544b29a8d4479bf3e7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3a860d27-a395-43a2-b0ac-83111b9b57b4/retrieve","id":"-834940289"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"81cd1a17-c701-43cf-9fd0-5ae3fc6e0b3f","content":"The Genetic Resources Unit (GRU) of CIAT was established as such in late 1977, and inherited the bean collections from the breeders. In 1978-79, collections of tropical pastures were progressively passed to the GRU for their conservation and study. With world mandates for Phaseolus beans and lowland tropical forages, the GRU conserves mostly as seed collections 34,617 and 20,753 accessions of these crops, respectively (CIAT, 2005). Because germplasm activities -namely distribution -have been on since 1973 (surely on a formal basis since 1980) to date, some analysis of trends is possible.The signing of an agreement in October 1994 between the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations and CIAT confirms further the curatorship role of GRU. Since 1995, distribution of germplasm to external users has been systematically done under the acceptance of a Material Transfer Agreement (MTA). In 1995-1996 the first designation to FAO (i.e. the sending of an electronic file about all accessions maintained in-trust by CIAT) took place, with subsequent updates every two years since. As per the last update in 2005, 61,311 accessions have been designated (for beans: 34,617; cassava: 5,941; and tropical forages: 20,753).Next to CIAT programmes are the national programmes of agricultural research: they have received more than 50% of distributed accessions, followed by universities with 20-36% of distributed accessions. NGOs, networks, other genebanks, and individual farmers represent less than 4% of distributed germplasm. Commercial companies have a share of 1-2% of total distributed. These distribution and related research activities have been supported by grants of CIAT core budget (with contributions of, namely, USAID and the EU), the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, the Systemwide Programme on Information for Plant Genetic Resources, and the Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural of Colombia.Testing germplasm for yield and adaptation through agronomy trials has been the main purpose of external users to ask CIAT for germplasm (70 and 46% of the accessions distributed to external institutions, for forages and beans, respectively). Breeding is important for bean, but less so for forages. Basic research (e.g. phylogeny, studies of gene pools, gene mapping) and applied research (e.g. reactions to diseases and pests) are important purposes of external requests, particularly over the last decade. Training is an important purpose only for forages. On the other hand, the entry into force of MTAs since 1995 has not affected distribution rates in contrast with the reduction of network activities for germplasm evaluation (IBYAN for beans, RIEPT for pastures) due to financial constraints.Over the period 1973-2005 (Figures 1-4), CIAT GRU has distributed 482,668 samples (399,570 of beans to institutions in 98 countries, and 83,098 of forages to 104 countries), over 8.5 times the size of the collection. The main users of CIAT genebank have been the commodity programmes of the Centre (76 and 48%, respectively).In both beans and forages, the top five country recipients received less than 50% of distributed germplasm (46 and 47%, respectively), while the numbers of countries are significant (98 and 104, respectively), indicating that CIAT GRU is an important provider of genetic resources for those commodities. As reported by FAO (1998), the collections of this genebank rank first in size and diversity. Beyond doubt, countries in Africa could make wider use of such collections. Interestingly, the five accessions with highest distribution rate (wrongly called \"best sellers\" because this service is free of charges for recipient institutions) for both commodities represent a very small fraction of total distributed, indicating that the distributed material has been diverse. The sort of materials distributed has also been changing over time; for instance, the forage legume Cratylia of no priority in the 1970s was the No. 1 in distribution in 2005, and wild beans with almost no demand in early times have been increasingly studied recently.Pending on seed availability, CIAT GRU distributes to recipients small samples of seeds, once the following conditions are fulfilled: i) the user is identified, ii) the requested material is defined, iii) the purpose of the request is spelled out, iv) the user has agreed on the MTA, and v) the obligations as per the phytosanitary regulations are met. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1109343381.json b/main/part_2/1109343381.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..588bbdfe6b58b5c5aa74dd3e2af05943f14b959b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1109343381.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"98e023b4-28d9-4aad-b8c0-7fe623d3c266","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1115425544.json b/main/part_2/1115425544.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d24e7abe87d3d1984514451e8560ea80a5d01c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1115425544.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"acf069d8f0b591eecb2458b2a2dfca78","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/7fd5853b-da9a-438d-8166-4e4de41506ad/content","id":"-295509769"},"keywords":["AD, anthesis day","BLP, best linear predictor","EH, ear height","FIRA, Fideicomiso Instituido en Relación con la Agricultura","GY, grain yield","HD, heading","LPSI, linear phenotypic selection index","MLE, maximum likelihood estimator","MOI, moisture content","PH, plant height","QT, quantitative trait","QTL, quantitative trait locus"],"sieverID":"d4bc4b9a-46ff-4e76-bf14-da67ba01fea9","content":"The profit function (net returns minus costs) allows breeders to derive trait economic weights to predict the net genetic merit (H) using the linear phenotypic selection index (LPSI). Economic weight is the increase in profit achieved by improving a particular trait by one unit and should reflect the market situation and not only preferences or arbitrary values. In maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) breeding programs, only grain yield has a specific market price, which makes application of a profit function difficult. Assuming the traits' phenotypic values have multivariate normal distribution, we used the market price of grain yield and its conditional expectation given all the traits of interest to construct a profit function and derive trait economic weights in maize and wheat breeding. Using simulated and real maize and wheat datasets, we validated the profit function by comparing its results with the results obtained from a set of economic weights from the literature. The criteria to validate the function were the estimated values of the LPSI selection response and the correlation between LPSI and H. For our approach, the maize and wheat selection responses were 1,567.13 and 1,291.5, whereas the correlations were .87 and .85, respectively. For the other economic weights, the selection responses were 0.79 and 2.67, whereas the correlations were .58 and .82, respectively. The simulated dataset results were similar. Thus, the profit function is a good option to assign economic weights in plant breeding.The linear phenotypic selection index (LPSI) is a linear combination of observable random trait phenotypic values (y, i.e., \uD835\uDC3C = \uD835\uDEC3 ′ \uD835\uDC66). According to Hazel et al. (1994), the LPSI allowsThe main LPSI objectives are to predict H, maximize the LPSI selection response, and the correlation between H and LPSI.When the population means of H and y are zero, the selection response is the conditional expectation of H given LPSI (Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2022;Cochran, 1951). The size of the estimated LPSI selection response and the estimated correlation between H and LPSI are the main criteria to validate and compare the efficiency of any LPSI in plant and animal breeding.The main assumptions of the LPSI theory are: (a) vector g is composed entirely of the additive effects of genes; (b) H is the total individual genotypic economic value; and (c), the y and H values have a joint multivariate normal distribution. Based on these assumptions, the LPSI is the conditional expectation of H given y (Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2022;Cochran, 1951), and to predict H we need to estimate the LPSI vector of coefficients (β) so that the estimated LPSI values may discriminate those individuals with the highest H values (Smith, 1936). Currently, a linear selection index can be a linear combination of marker scores and phenotypic values (Cerón-Rojas et al., 2008;Lande & Thompson, 1990), genomic estimated breeding values (Cerón-Rojas et al., 2015;Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2019), and phenotypic and genomic estimated breeding values jointly (Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2018, 2020a, 2022;Dekkers, 2007).The trait economic weight is the increase in profit (net returns minus costs) achieved by improving a particular trait by one unit while the others remain fixed (Charffeddine & Alenda, 1998;Blasco, 2021). It should reflect the market situation and the marginal benefit from one unit of improvement, as opposed to just preferences or simply arbitrarily fixed values (Magnussen, 1990). Strain and Nordskog (1962) proposed using a profit function to integrate the costs and benefits of a breeding program and compare the profitability of lines and crosses. Later, Moav and Moav (1966), and Moav and Hill (1966), used the partial derivatives of the profit function (evaluated in the trait's mean) as economic weights for within-line selection.The profit function depends on the traits of interest, the market prices of the traits, the production technology, and market conditions (Charffeddine & Alenda, 1998). An additional feature of profit functions is they may be linear or non-linear. Although a non-linear profit function can be a function of phenotypic values of individual plants or a function of population means, the linear profit function is one of the phenotypic trait values of individual plants or animals (Itoh & Yamada, 1988). Nevertheless, an LPSI can still be used for a non-linear profit function, although the optimum index depends on the selection intensity and the number of generations over which the selection response is to be maximized. According to Goddard (1983), an LPSI achieves the greatest increase in profit when the profit function and economic weights are not linear. Thus, an LPSI will always• LPSI is the best linear predictor of the net genetic merit . • The main LPSI objective is to predict the net genetic merit and maximize the selection response. • The profit function allows breeders to derive trait economic weights to predict H. • Economic weight is the increase in profit achieved by improving a particular trait by one unit.give the optimum selection response for linear and non-linear profit functions.Conditions for applying the profit function theory are: (a) changes in profit function should be due to changes in H and not to environmental conditions or changes in technology; (b) prices and costs are constants; and (c) because the genetic gains in each cycle are low, a linear approach to the profit function is recommended (Charffeddine & Alenda, 1998). In this context, the net genetic merit, the estimated LPSI selection response, and the estimated LPSI values should be interpreted in terms of economic gains and costs (Blasco, 2021).In this research, we describe a profit function to obtain economic weights in the maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) breeding context. Contrary to animal breeding, where the traits of economic interest have a specific price on the market, in maize and wheat breeding only grain yield has a specific market price, which makes it difficult to apply a profit function and obtain economic weights. For this reason, the proposed profit function is based on grain yield market price and on the regression coefficients of grain yield on all the associated traits. In this manner, the grain yield market price is distributed over the other traits as a product of price and the regression coefficient of each trait associated with grain yield. Using seven simulated maize datasets and one real maize and wheat dataset, we validated the profit function by comparing its results with the results obtained from a set of economic weights taken from published literature (Cerón-Rojas et al., 2015;Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2019, 2020a, 2020b). The criteria to validate the proposed profit function were the size of the estimated LPSI selection response and the estimated correlation coefficient between LPSI and H. For the simulated and real datasets, we found the profit function described in this work is a good option to assign economic weights in maize and wheat breeding.As we shall see later, the approach to the profit function theory described in this study is a mathematical formalization of Smith's (1936) idea to assign economic weights to the traits of interest in the wheat breeding context. Finally, the results obtained in this study are the first to use a profit function to derive economic weights in maize and wheat breeding. A short review of the LPSI theory is provided in the Appendix.Consider in a wheat selection program we consider the vector y' = [Y 1 . . . Y t ] of t traits, where Y 1 denotes grain yield, Y 2 baking quality, Y 3 resistance to flag smut, and so forth. We can evaluate Y 2 and Y 3 in terms of Y 1 as follows. Supposing an advance of 10 in the baking score is equal in value to an advance of one bushel per acre in yield, and that a decrease of 20% infection is worth one bushel of yield, then, taking \uD835\uDC4C 1 as a standard and units as indicated,w 1 = 1.0, w 2 = 0.1, and w 3 = −0.05 will be the economic values of each trait. This is the Smith's (1936) idea for deriving economic weight in wheat breeding programs. Now, let y' −1 = [Y 2 . . . Y t ] be a vector of t−1 traits that does not include Y 1 and assume that Y 1 is the dependent random variable, whereas y′ −1 is the vector of random explanatory variables. To derive economic weights for maize and wheat breeding, we will adapt the above-mentioned Smith's idea to the multiple regression context, that is, Y 1 = b 0 + b'y −1 + e (where e has normal distribution, null expectation, and variance, σ 2 \uD835\uDC52 ), using the profit function and the regression theory.Let a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a N be the N input prices or costs of the N input variables X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X N such as fertilizers, number of cultivated hectares, number of workers per hectare, worker wages per hectare, etc.; then, the cost function is:where C 0 is the fixed cost in the plant breeding program.The main objective for maize and wheat breeding programs is to increase grain yield (Y 1 ) and to decrease traits such as plant height, days to maturity, and plant diseases, and others. In these programs, only Y 1 has a market price, so we will define the profit function as follows: let π be the price of Y 1 in tons per hectare, and let N H be the number of hectares cultivated by the breeder; then, the profit function associated with Y 1 is:where N H πY 1 is the net economic return and N H C is the selection cycle cost of the breeding program. Equation 2 only includes Y 1 .The profit function for all traits under selection Suppose each random vector of t traits y' = [Y 1 . . . Y t ] (which include the grain yield, Y 1 , and all traits associated with Y 1 ) is independent and identically distributed as a multivariate normal distribution with vector of means μ' = [μ 1 . . . μ t ] and covariance matrix P, where matrix P indicates that the elements of y may be correlated and have different variance. We will include vector y' −1 = [Y 2 . . . Y t ] (which does not include Y 1 ) in Equation 2 through the conditional expectation of Y 1 given y −1 . Thus, let:be the multiple linear regression model where e has a normal distribution, null expectation and varianceis the covariance between Y 1 and y −1 , and S −1 is the inverse of the covariance matrix of y −1 (S) (Rencher & Schaalje, 2008). In addition, we assumed that the covariance between any pairs of e is 0. Therefore, with Equation 3, the conditional expectation of Y 1 given y −1 is:where μ 1 is the mean of Y 1 , m' = [μ 2 . . . μ t ] is the vector of means of y −1 , and b' = cov'(Y 1 , y -1 )S -1 = [b 2 . . . b t ] is the vector of regression coefficients. In Equations 3 and 4, the values of y −1 are not under the control of the experimenter and occur randomly along with Y 1 (Rencher, 2002). Thus, on each plant, we observe Y 1 and y −1 jointly.The maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of Equations 3 and 4 iswhere Ŷ1 is the estimated BLP of Y 1 , whereas μ1and m, respectively (Rencher & Schaalje, 2008). Equation 5 is a function of y −1 alone and not a function of Y 1 (Christensen, 2011), allowing us to write an approximated profit function for t traits as:Crop ScienceIn Equation 6, the symbol \"≈\" indicates an approximation.Suppose C is fixed (Equation 1), the partial derivatives of Equation 6with respect to Y 1 and each trait associated with Ŷ1 (Equation 5) are, respectively, ∂ ∂\uD835\uDC4C 12 b\uD835\uDC57 , j = 2,3,. . . ,t, from where the estimated economic weights for Y 1 and Y j are:respectively (Goddard, 1983;Moav & Hill, 1966;Moav & Moav, 1966). Therefore, according to Equation 7, an MLE of the vector of economic weights and A2) is:where all the components of Equation 8 were defined earlier.According to Pawitan (2013, p. 45), the invariance property of the MLE says: \"If ŵ is the MLE of w and g(w) is a function of w, then g( ŵ) is the MLE of g(w).\" Thus, by this property and by Equation 8, we can assume that an MLE estimator of the LPSI vector of coefficients (Equation A3) is:where Ĝ and Pˆ− 1 are restricted MLE (Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2018) of the genotypic covariance matrix G (Equation A1) and the inverse phenotypic covariance matrix of P (Equation A3), respectively. Equation 9 implies the estimated LPSI (Equation A3) is:which should be interpreted in terms of monetary units when breeders predict H (Equations A1 and A2). The estimated LPSI selection response (Equation A4) is:where k denotes the selection intensity. Furthermore, becauseπ\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 appears on the numerator and denominator of the correlation (Equation A5) between LPSI and H, this last parameter is not affected by π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 and can be estimated as:All the terms of Equation 12were defined earlier.For the set of economic weights taken from published literature (Cerón-Rojas et al., 2015) we estimated the LPSI parameter and we made selection with the simulated and real datasets using \"RIndSel,\" an R software for Index Selection (Alvarado et al., 2018;Pacheco et al., 2017;Perez-Elizalde et al., 2014). In addition, to apply the profit function described in this work, we made an R-code to estimate the economic weights and to make LPSI selection. RIndSel is an R software completely automated, thus, users only need to learn how to introduce their data into the program and how to interpret the results. This software, and a complete user manual, can be downloaded from https://data.cimmyt.org/dataset.xhtml? persistentId=hdl:11529/10854These datasets were simulated by Cerón-Rojas et al. (2015) with QU-GENE software using 2,500 molecular markers and 315 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for eight phenotypic selection cycles (C0 to C7), each with four traits (Y 1 , Y 2 , Y 3 , and Y 4 ), 500 genotypes, and four replicates for each genotype. The authors distributed the markers uniformly across 10 chromosomes and the QTLs randomly across the 10 chromosomes to simulate maize (Zea mays L.) populations. A different number of QTLs affected each of the four traits: 300, 100, 60, and 40, respectively. The common QTLs affecting the traits generated genotypic correlations of −0.5, 0.4, 0. We used one maize and one wheat dataset from CIMMYT breeders' experimental research. The maize traits (grain yield, GY in t ha −1 ; anthesis day, AD, in days; moisture content, MOI, %; plant height, PH, in cm; and ear height, EH, in cm) were evaluated in five sites. The number of maize genotypes was 68, each with two repetitions, whereas the environment was optimal. The economic weight for each trait was 5, −0.3, −0.3, −0.3 and −0.3, respectively. Likewise, the wheat traits (GY; heading, HD, days; and PH) were evaluated in one environment. The number of wheat genotypes was 100, each with two repetitions, whereas the economic weight for each trait was 5, −0.3, and −0.3, respectively. We compared the maize and wheat results using the selected top 10% (k = 1.755) of the estimated LPSI values. The real datasets are available by request at j.crossa@cgiar .org. 2015) simulated maize datasets described earlier, if the harvest corresponded to 1% of a hectare, that is, a plot or cultivated area of 10 by 10 = 100 m 2 . Note that 1 ha is equal to 100 by 100 = 10,000 m 2 ; therefore, to obtain the cost for the simulated datasets, we divided MX$38,392.75 by 100, where the cost for each simulated selection cycle was MX$383.93. In addition, the average of simulated grain yield for Cycle 1 was 161.88 kg; thus, because for 1,000 kg the price is MX$3,182.00, by using the rule of three, we found that for 161.88 kg the grain yield price is MX$515.101. We used a similar approach to obtain prices and costs for the other selection cycles.According to FIRA data, we used MX$3,182.00 for each ton of maize. Nevertheless, for each ton of wheat, the average price estimated by FIRA was MX$5,265.00. To estimate the vector of economic weights (Equation 9) for both real datasets, N H = 1.0 (1 ha).Note that Equation 6 can be written asThis means that when n = 1 we shall have Equation 2, and for n = 2 we shall have Equation 6. However, when n = 3 or n = 4, we shall have a profit function that assigns more weight to Ŷ1 than to Y 1 . Thus, by the above equation, breeders are free to assign weights to Ŷ1 and Y 1 according to their interest. can assume that the estimated LPSI vector of coefficients ( β = P−1 Ĝ ŵ, Equation 9) is MLE. The same is true for the estimated correlation between the estimated LPSI ( ρ\uD835\uDC3B\uD835\uDC3C ) and the net genetic merit (Equation 12; Table 1), as well as the estimated LPSI selection response ( R, Equation 11; Table 3).Cerón-Rojas and Crossa (2020b) have shown ρ\uD835\uDC3B\uD835\uDC3C and R are asymptotically unbiased estimators with minimum variance, and they gave methods to obtain confidence intervals for the expectations of R and ρ\uD835\uDC3B\uD835\uDC3C ; however, until now, the statistical properties of β = P−1 Ĝ ŵ have not been shown completely.By the above results, all the estimated parameters associated with the LPSI are maximum likelihood estimators with minimum variance, and they are asymptotic unbiased estimators for R and ρ \uD835\uDC3B\uD835\uDC3C .In the Introduction, we indicated some statistical properties of the LPSI when the phenotypic (P) and genotypic (G) covariance matrices are known. Let ϵ = \uD835\uDC3B − Î be the error of prediction of Î (Equation 10); then: (a) ϵ and Î are independent; (b) by the central limit theorem (Kollo, 2005), Î converges in distribution with the normal distribution(c) Î is an asymptotically efficient predictor. This last result allows us to construct a confidence interval for the conditional expectation of H [E(H|I)] as:where Î denotes the estimated LPSI values, Z α/2 is the upper 100 α 2 percentage point of the standard normal distribution, and 0 ≤ α ≤ 1 is the level of confidence. Thus, to establish a 100(1 − α) = 95% confidence interval for E(H/I), the value of \uD835\uDC4D α∕2 is equal to 1.96. To construct the above confidence interval, it should be convenient to omit the π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 from the estimated LPSI parameters because π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 increases the length of the interval. The same is true for the variance of the error of prediction. That is, the π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 values increase the estimate of the prediction error variance. According to these results, the LPSI theory gives breeders a viable statistical method to make multi-trait selection.Numerical resultsTable 1 presents cost (Equation 1), grain yield price (π), and π times the number of hectares cultivated (N H = 0.01 or 1% of a cultivated hectare) and divided by 2 ( π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 ; e.g., [(515.101)(0.01)]/2 = 2.576). Although the cost for each selection cycle was the same, the price changed, as this depends on the harvested grain yield in each selection cycle. Similar results were obtained for the π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 values because this depends on π.According to Equations 7-9, the estimated economic weights presented in Table 2 ( ŵ1 to ŵ4 ) were the product of π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 times the coefficient of grain yield Y 1 (1.0 or b1 ) and the estimated coefficients of regression of Y 1 on Y 2 , Y 3 , and Y 4 ( b2 to b4 ). For this reason, whereas the economic weight of Y 1 was equal to π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 (Table 2), the economic weights for traits Y 2 to Y 4 were ŵ2 = π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 b2 , ŵ3 = π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 b3 , and ŵ4 = π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 b4 , respectively. In addition, because the estimated regression coefficients b2 to b4 are MLE, by the MLE invariance property (Pawitan, 2013), the estimators ŵ2 , ŵ2 , and ŵ4 were MLE. This means we can assume the estimator of the vector of economic weights (Equation 8) was a minimum variance and asymptotic unbiased estimator.For k = 1.755 (top 10% of the estimated LPSI values), Table 3 presets the estimated selection response obtained when using the profit function ( R) and the estimated selection response ( R * ) when the economic weight were obtained from the published literature. In a similar manner, Table 3 presents means that the estimated vector of economic weights (Equation 8) affected mainly the estimated LPSI selection ( R), as we would expect. By Equations 8 and 9, the estimated selection response (Equation 11) can be written as2 , k, and toNote that when π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 andtend to zero, R tends to zero. Therefore, the higher value of R will be when 2 should be high. For breeding and economic objectives jointly, both parts should be high.The total average of the ρHI values was 0.820 (Table 3), meaning that the estimated LPSI values predict the H values with high accuracy. However, the total average of the ρ * HI values was 0.863 (Table 3), that is, the values of ρ * HI were higher than the ρHI values. In addition, because π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 appears in the numerator and denominator of the correlation between the estimated LPSI and H values (Equation 12), the values of ρHI and ρ * For this dataset, the ton grain yield price was MX$3182.00, thus, for \uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B = 1.0, only affected R, this was higher than R * . Nevertheless, in this case ρHI was higher than ρ * HI .For this dataset, the ton grain yield price was MX$5265.00, then, for \uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B = 1.0, 2 affected only R, this was higher than R * , whereas the correlation coefficients were similar.The real maize and wheat genotypes selected with LPSI Table 4 presents the selected maize genotype (with k = 1.755), and the means of five selected traits (GY, AD, MOI, PH, and EH) using the economic weights obtained with the profit function and the economic weights 5, −0.3, −0.3, −0.3, and −0.3, respectively. In addition, Table 4 presents the total means of the selected traits, the population mean of the traits, and the selection differential (mean of the selected traits minus the population mean of the traits) for each trait. Table 5 presents the selected wheat genotype (with k = 1.755), the means of three selected traits (GY, HD, and PH) using the economic weights obtained with the profit function and the economic weights 5, −0.3 and −0.3, respectively, the total mean of the selected traits, the population mean of the traits, and the selection differential for each trait.The maize genotypes selected by our approach are different to the maize genotypes selected by the other approach (Table 4). However, six wheat genotypes (6,10,12,39,45,71) selected with our approach were the same as those selected by the other approach (Table 5). This means that when the number of traits increases in the LPSI, both approaches tend to select different genotypes, which does not occur when the number of LPSI traits is low, as in the wheat dataset. Likewise, although the maize and wheat estimated LPSI values obtained using the profit function economic weights were all positive (Tables 4 and 5), the estimated maize and wheat LPSI values obtained using the other economic weights described above were all negative. Thus, both sets of economic weights affect the estimated LPSI values in a different way, as we would expect. In addition, note that the traits mean selected with the LPSI using our approach were all higher than the traits mean selected by the LPSI using the other approach. This explains why, in general, the selection differential values for each trait obtained with our approach were mainly positive, whereas for the other approach they were mostly negative.Using a stochastics linear regression model and a profit function, we developed a methodology to enable plant breeders define economic weights for selection indices. Our aim was to obtain economic weights for selection indices that can improve selection decisions in plant breeding when several traits (GY, maturity, HD, PH, etc.) are simultaneously selected. The problem to construct a profit function in maize and wheat breeding is evident: only GY has a market price, as we have indicated in the Introduction of this study. Therefore, our approach is based on GY market price and on the regression coefficients of GY on all the other associated traits.Our results show that the profit function and the regression theory allow us to estimate the trait economic weights in the maize and wheat breeding context and select genotypes using the LPSI theory. For seven simulated datasets and two real datasets, the estimated LPSI selection responses were higher in all cases when we used the method described in this study to obtain the economic weights. This was not generally true for the estimated correlation between the LPSI and H, thus further research is necessary on this topic.When we compared the R values obtained in this study with the R * values (Table 3) obtained by Cerón-Rojas et al. (2015) and Cerón-Rojas and Crossa (2020b), who used the simulated datasets described in this paper and the LPSI to make selections, we found that in all cases the R values were higher than the R * values. The same was true for the maize and wheat real datasets. In addition, the estimated selection responses of this research have an economic interpretation, but this type of interpretation it is not possible for the R * values of the above authors. Thus, the profit function described in this study to obtain economic weights is effective for evaluating the profitability of plant breeding programs.T A B L E 4 Selected maize genotype and selected traits (grain yield, GY; anthesis day, AD; moisture content, MOI; plant height, PH; and ear height, EH) for k = 1.755 using the economic weights obtained with the profit function and the economic weights 5, −0.3, −0.3, −0.3 and −0.3, respectively, and estimated linear phenotypic selection index (LPSI) valuesResults As we would expect, the profit function (Equations 7 and 8) assigned more weight to Y 1 than to the other traits. In addition, because the economic weight of Y 1 is equal to π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 , all the seven selection cycles coefficients of Y 1 ( b1 ) in Table 2 are equal to 1.0, whereas the values of the other traits' regression coefficients ( b2 to b4 ) differ from 1.0. This shows the method described in this study is an adaptation of the Smith (1936) idea to the multiple regression context using the profit function and regression theory.Note that Equations 7 and 8 are linked to the market situation and therefore the trait economic values are neither simply arbitrarily fixed values nor preference values. In addition,the regression coefficients, which are multiplied by π\uD835\uDC41 \uD835\uDC3B 2 to obtain the economic weights, are associated with grain yield effects. Thus, the proposed profit function is a good option for obtaining economic weights to make LPSI selection in plant breeding.Why use a linear approach to derive the economic weights?In the study of maize and wheat quantitative trait (QTs), it is assumed traits such as GY, PH, EH, etc., are the result of an undetermined number of unobservable gene effects distributed across the plant genome that interact among themselves and with the environment to produce the observable characteristic plant phenotypes (Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2018). This implies the QTs have continuously distributed phenotypes that do show a complex Mendelian inheritance (Hill, 2010). The QTs are difficult to analyze because heritable variations of these traits are masked by larger nonheritable variations that make it difficult to determine the genotypic values of individual plants (Smith, 1936).To analyze QTs, we assumed the traits of interest and the net genetic merit have joint multivariate normal distribution. Under this distribution, the means, variances, and covariances completely describe the index and trait values. Moreover, if the trait values are not correlated, they are independent; linear combinations of traits are normal; and even when the trait phenotypic values do not have normal distribution, by the central limit this distribution serves as a useful approximation (Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2020b;Rencher, 2002). In addition, under the multivariate normality assumption, the regression of the net genetic merit on any linear function of the phenotypic values is linear (Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2022;Kempthorne & Nordskog, 1959).Using histograms, quantile-quantile plots, and the Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality tests, Cerón-Rojas andCrossa (2018, 2020b) showed that the estimated LPSI values, and the average values of traits such as GY, PH, EH, etc., in maize and wheat breeding, approached the normal distribution. One additional criterion to assume the QTs have multivariate normal distribution is based on the infinitesimal model theory (Barton et al., 2017;Fisher, 1918;Turelli, 2017;Walsh & Lynch, 2018). Under this model, (a) in the plant genome there is a very large number of loci, each with very small effects; (b) in a randomly mating population, under no selection, the genotypic distribution is normal, and (c) the genotypic distributions stay at least close to normal after selection (Walsh & Lynch, 2018).Under the foregoing assumptions, Equations 3-5 are linear. Moreover, any function that is expressible as Equation 4is linear even if the vector b depends on the joint distribution of H and the traits phenotypes (Cerón-Rojas & Crossa, 2022). Based on these reasons, using a linear approach to obtain economic weights in the maize and wheat breeding context seems correct. Finally, note in Equation 3, the independent and dependent variables are random variables, and the same is true for the residuals; then Equation 3 and 4 are stochastics linear model, no determinist model.Alternatively, Goddard (1983) has analyzed the profit function in the linear and nonlinear context and concluded the better approach to maximize the LPSI selection response is to use a linear profit function. In his research, Goddard (1983) presents examples of why breeders should use a linear profit function in the LPSI context to derive economic weights. Based on that, we believe our approach to obtain economic weights is optimal in the context of maize and wheat.The invariance property of the MLE is associated with the invariance principle of the likelihood ratio, which indicates \"in the likelihood function the information should be invariant to the choice of parameterization\" (Pawitan, 2013, p. 45). This means if we do not know where the parameter of interest is, then we should not know where its log is, or where its squared is, or its inverse value. That is, we should be equally ignorant regardless of how we model our problem. Pawitan (2013, p. 44) indicates \"the invariant property of the likelihood ratio should be seen only as a convenient axiom, rather than a self-evident truth.\"Economic weights are difficult to assign in plant and animal breeding programs, and some authors have described alternatives to the LPSI. For example, Elston (1963) described a free-economic weights selection index that does not require estimates of the phenotypic and genotypic covariance matrices. Likewise, other authors (Brascamp, 1984;Itoh & Yamada, 1986, 1987;Pesek & Baker, 1969;Yamada et al., 1975) described the desired gains index, which does not use economic weights because it does not predict H, rather it only estimates the expectation of g. In turn, Cerón-Rojas et al. (2008b, 2016) described the eigen selection index method, where w (the vector of \"economic weights\") is a linear combination of the first eigen-vector of the matrix of multi-trait heritability. Thus, these last three indices do not use a profit function (net returns minus costs) to obtain economic weights to evaluate breeding programs. However, in this study, we have showed it is possible to assign economic weights to maize and wheat breeding traits using a profit function.Finally, it is evident that there is the possibility to development non-linear profit functions to obtain economic weights, however, Goddard (1983) have showed that a LPSI will always give the highest selection response including when breeder uses non-linear profit function. Our research represents the first formal attempt to incorporate economic weights for selection indices that can improve selection decisions.Farmers and consumers are now placing strong emphasis on sourcing and sustainability, thus other criteria such as carbon footprints, water use, nitrogen emissions, and ecosystem services should be considered in addition to profitability. However, these issues are hard to capture in a simple selection index that attempts to improve few traits. Farms are more complex than simple profit and the need for cultivars that do not maximize profitability of the crop but of the system is an important factor that is not easily incorporated in a selection index.In addition, not all farmers are risk takers, and often plant high yielding hybrids at low density to avoid failure risks. This gradient in plant population densities used by farmers indicates there is a gradient in risk attitudes. The question is: what is the target group to make selections for? Simple models to account for risk attitude suggest the selection of different crops and cultivars within crops account for the risk aversion differences. The method proposed here for estimating economic weights to be used in a selection index to bring an economic dimension to selection indices is a step towards allowing the breeder to use economic information correctly. Further studies are needed to formalize and bring socioeconomic dimensions to selection decisions by using a framework that considers the many uncertainties and sources of variability among farms and the mixture of farms in the target population of farms.Assuming the traits and the net genetic merit have joint multivariate normal distribution, we have described a profit function for obtaining economic weights in maize and wheat breeding programs. Using the profit function and the linear regression theory, we obtained a profit function that extends the Smith's idea to assign economic weights in wheat breeding. In animal breeding programs, all economic traits of interest have specific market prices; however, in the maize and wheat breeding context, only GY has a specific price on the market. For this reason, the proposed profit function is com-posed of two parts: one associated with the GY and the other linked to the expectation of GY given the values of the other traits. Using the proposed approach, the average of the estimated correlation between the LPSI and the net genetic merit for the seven simulated selection cycles was 0.820, and for the maize and wheat real datasets were 0.87 and 0.85, respectively. Therefore, we concluded the profit function proposed in this study is a strong option for obtaining economic weights in plant breeding."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1127032359.json b/main/part_2/1127032359.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19227d864af4109f7c9edf6b6eda14890a86a0ae --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1127032359.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7f94ca2988bbfb18f9326047aefb339f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c9b25d97-16ee-4f0a-9de4-2b4240790fdc/retrieve","id":"386453607"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"87cb0e7c-3567-4e94-a395-1a5ef5905c59","content":") is an important staple food crop in Africa and South America; however, ubiquitous deleterious mutations may severely decrease its fitness. To evaluate these deleterious mutations, we constructed a cassava haplotype map through deep sequencing 24 diverse accessions and identified >28 million segregating variants. We found that (i) although domestication has modified starch and ketone metabolism pathways to allow for human consumption, the concomitant bottleneck and clonal propagation have resulted in a large proportion of fixed deleterious amino acid changes, increased the number of deleterious alleles by 26%, and shifted the mutational burden toward common variants; (ii) deleterious mutations have been ineffectively purged, owing to limited recombination in the cassava genome; (iii) recent breeding efforts have maintained yield by masking the most damaging recessive mutations in the heterozygous state but have been unable to purge the mutation burden; such purging should be a key target in future cassava breeding.For millions of people in the tropics, cassava is the third most consumed carbohydrate source, after rice and maize 1 . Even though cassava was domesticated in Latin America 2,3 , it has spread widely and has become a major staple crop in Africa. Although its wild progenitor, M. esculenta sp. falbellifolia, reproduces by seed 4 , cultivated cassava is notably almost exclusively clonally propagated via stem cutting 5 . The limited number of recombination events in such vegetatively propagated crops may result in an accumulation of deleterious alleles throughout the genome 6 . Thus, mutation burden in cassava is expected to be more severe than that in sexually propagated species. Deleterious mutations are considered to be at the heart of inbreeding depression 7 . Even in elite cassava accessions, inbreeding depression is extremely severe, and a single generation of inbreeding may result in a >60% decrease in fresh root yield 8,9 . In this study, we sought to identify deleterious mutations in cassava populations, with the goal of accelerating cassava breeding by allowing breeders to purge deleterious mutations more efficiently.We conducted a comprehensive characterization of genetic variation by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 241 cassava accessions (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1). On average, more than 30× coverage was generated for each accession. To ensure high-quality variant discovery, variants from low-copynumber regions of the cassava genome 10,11 were identified to develop the cassava haplotype map II (HapMapII) (Supplementary Fig. 2), containing 25.9 million SNPs and 1.9 million insertions/deletions (indels) (Supplementary Table 2), of which nearly 50% were rare (minor-allele frequency <0.05) (Supplementary Fig. 3). The error rate of variant calling, i.e., the proportion of segregating sites in the reference accession, was 0.01%. The correlation between read depth and the proportion of SNP heterozygosity was extremely low (r 2 = 6 × 10 −5 ). Haplotypes were phased, and missing genotypes were imputed with high accuracy with BEAGLE v4.1 (ref. 12) (accuracy r 2 = 0.966) (Supplementary Fig. 4). Linkage disequilibrium was as low as that in maize 13 and decayed to an average r 2 of 0.1 in 3,000 bp (Supplementary Fig. 5).Cultivated cassava had lower nucleotide diversity (pairwise nucleotide diversity (π) = 0.0036) than did its progenitors (M. esculenta sp. flabelifolia, π = 0.0051). In addition, a close relationship between the two species was observed in a phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Fig. 6). Both lines of evidence supported the hypothesis that cultivated cassava was domesticated from M. esculenta sp. flabelifolia 2,3,10 . To evaluate population differentiation of cassava, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed and showed substantial differentiation among all cassava species and hybrids (Fig. 1a): cultivated cassava showed moderate genetic differentiation from its progenitors (fixation index (F st ) = 0.16) and high genetic differentiation from tree cassava (F st = 0.32) and wild relatives (F st = 0.44) (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 7). However, PCA showed very little differentiation among cultivated cassava (Fig. 1b), and cultivated cassava within geographic subpopulations presented unexpectedly Cassava haplotype map highlights fixation of deleterious mutations during clonal propagation l e t t e r s low values of F st (0.01-0.05) even though these subpopulations were sampled from different continents (Supplementary Table 2). This result suggested that despite clonal propagation, there has been sufficient crossing to maintain cultivated cassava in one breeding pool.Sequence conservation is a powerful tool to discover functional variation 14,15 . We identified candidate deleterious mutations by using genomic evolution and amino acid conservation modeling. The cassava genome was aligned to seven species in the Malpighiales clade to identify evolutionarily constrained regions in the cassava genome. On the basis of the genomic evolutionary rate profiling (GERP) 16 score, nearly 104 Mb of the genome (20%) of cassava was constrained (GERP score >0) (Supplementary Fig. 8). The evolutionarily constrained genome of cassava (104 Mb) was comparable to that of maize (111 Mb) 17 in size, but was smaller than that of humans (214 Mb) 16 and larger than that of Drosophila (88 Mb) 18 . GERP profiling also identified a remarkably asymmetric distribution of constrained sequence at the chromosome scale (Supplementary Fig. 9). In addition to the constraint estimation at the DNA level, consequences of mutation on amino acids in proteins were assessed by using the Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) program 19 . Nearly 3.0% of coding SNPs in cultivated cassava were nonsynonymous mutations (Supplementary Table 2), of which 19.3% (57,952) were putatively deleterious (SIFT <0.05). Because the strength of functional prediction methods varies 14 , we combined the criteria of SIFT (<0.05) and GERP (>2) to obtain a more conservative set of 22,495 deleterious mutations (Supplementary Fig. 10).To estimate the individual mutation burden, we used rubber (Hevea brasiliensis), which diverged from the cassava lineage 27 million years (Myr) ago 10 , as an outgroup to identify derived deleterious alleles in cassava. The derived allele frequency (DAF) spectrum showed that cassava (4.6%, Fig. 2) appeared to have more fixed deleterious mutations than maize (3.2%, DAF >0.8) 20 when compared at the same threshold (SIFT <0.05). Across cultivated cassava, there were 150 fixed deleterious mutations. These deleterious mutations cannot be purged through standard breeding, which relies on recombination of segregating alleles, but they are potential targets for genome editing 21 . Together with the other 22,345 segregating deleterious mutations, the mutation burden in cassava was substantial. Given the several millennia of breeding in the species, why are these deleterious mutations still present in cultivated cassava, and how have breeders been managing them? We evaluated recombination, selection, and drift as the main processes controlling the distribution of deleterious mutations in cassava.Recombination is an essential process to purge deleterious mutations from the genome 22 . In vegetatively propagated species such as cassava, recombination is expected be less efficient in purging deleterious mutations. This hypothesis was supported by a weak correlation between the recombination rate and the distribution of deleterious mutations (Pearson's r = −0.066, P = 0.13, Fig. 3a). Deleterious mutations were nearly uniformly spread across the cassava genome (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 11) rather than being concentrated in low-recombination regions, as seen in humans 23 , fruit flies 24 , and maize 17 . Thus, recombination, which is presumably rare in a clonally propagated crop, does not effectively purge the mutation burden in cassava.Domestication is important in the evolution and improvement of crop species. The major domestication trait of cassava is the large carbohydrate-rich storage root. Cultivated cassava has a starch content 5 to 6 times higher than that of its progenitor 4 . Another domestication trait is the decreased cyanide content in roots 4 . Every tissue of cassava contains cyanogenic glucosides 25 . Ketones, cyanohydrin, and hydrogen cyanide are the key toxic compounds formed during degradation of cyanogenic glucosides 25,26 . These toxic compounds must be eliminated before human consumption. To identify the genomic regions under selection during domestication, the cross-population composite likelihood ratio (XP-CLR) 27 was used to scan the genome in Latin American cassava (LAC) accessions and the progenitor (M. esculenta sp. flabelifolia). We identified 203 selective sweeps containing 427 genes in LAC (Supplementary Fig. 12a). Genes in these sweep regions showed enrichment in starch and sucrose synthesis (3.8-fold enrichment; false discovery rate (FDR) = 7.2 × 10 −3 ) and cellular ketone metabolism (3.4-fold enrichment; FDR = 5.3 × 10 −3 ) (Supplementary Fig. 12b). The results suggested that selection during domestication increased the production of carbohydrates and decreased the cyanogenic glucoside content in cassava. Likewise, selection signatures of a recent bottleneck event in African cassava (AC) accessions were also evaluated. A total of 244 selective sweeps were identified, containing 416 genes. These genes were enriched in serine family amino acid metabolism (4.2-fold enrichment, FDR = 2.1 × 10 −6 ) and cellular response to stress ( A total of 9.1% genetic variance was captured in the first two principal components. LAC, Latin American cassava; ACC, Asian cultivated cassava; EAC, East African cassava; WAC, West African cassava; CWL, crosses between WAC and LAC. FDR = 4.9 × 10 −6 , Supplementary Fig. 12c,d). Because l-serine is involved in the plant response to biotic and abiotic stresses 28,29 , together with the functional enrichment in cellular response to stress, this result may reflect that disease-resistance accessions were selected for in a recent breeding program in Africa 9 . How was the mutation burden shaped in the selective sweeps? We found that LAC, compared with progenitors, showed 25% fewer (P = 0.009, Fig. 4a) deleterious alleles in sweep regions. Similarly, AC, compared with LAC, exhibited a 35% decrease (P = 2.1 × 10 −7 , Fig. 4b) in sweep regions. In addition to the comparison among populations, significant within-population decreases in deleterious alleles were observed by comparing sweep regions with the rest of the genome. For example, selective sweeps exhibited a 44% decrease (P = 9.7 × 10 −12 , Fig. 4c) in deleterious alleles in LAC and a 41% decrease (P = 8.7 × 10 −130 , Fig. 4d) in AC. This result suggests that haplotypes containing fewer deleterious alleles have been favored during selection.However, drift after domestication may have played a more important role in affecting mutation burden in cassava. Although LAC and AC, compared with their progenitors, had a similar number of deleterious alleles (P = 0.42, Fig. 5a), they exhibited a prominent increase in total burden by 26% (P = 9.1 × 10 −9 , Fig. 5a) and a shifted burden toward common deleterious variants (Supplementary Fig. 13). The increase in deleterious alleles during domestication has also been found in dogs 30 . The results suggest that the severe bottleneck in domestication and the shift from sexual reproduction to clonal propagation have resulted in a rapid accumulation of deleterious alleles in cultivated cassava.How have breeders been able to maintain yield, given the substantial increase in mutation burden in cultivated cassava? The answer became apparent when the homozygous and heterozygous deleterious alleles were compared. In cultivated accessions, compared with progenitors, the homozygous-mutation burden substantially decreased, by 23% (P = 7 × 10 −3 , Fig. 5b), regardless of the elevated frequency of deleterious alleles (Supplementary Fig. 13), whereas the heterozygous-mutation burden markedly increased, by 96% (P = 8.1 × 10 −7 , Fig. 5c), despite the decreased genetic diversity in cultivated cassava (π = 0.0036) compared with progenitors (π = 0.0051). In addition, we also compared the observed and mutation burdens under the assumption of Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) in cultivated cassava. The relative depletion of the homozygous-mutation burden and the excess heterozygous-mutation burden would not have been present unless they were selected for and maintained. The results showed a decreased homozygous-mutation burden (LAC, 5.6% decrease, P = 0; AC, 10.3% decrease, P = 0, Fig. 5d) and an increased observed heterozygous-mutation burden (LAC, 3.5% increase, P = 1.5 × 10 −312 ; AC, 6.9% increase, P = 0, Fig. 5e), thus indicating a significant deviation from the HWE expectation. These results suggested that breeders have been trying to manage the recessive deleterious mutations in the heterozygous state to mask the harmful effects.Mutations with a large homozygous effect are more likely to be recessive 31 . We found that nearly 64.5% of deleterious mutations occurred only in the heterozygous state. Although the low allele frequency prevents effective tests for excess heterozygosity of these deleterious mutations, these mutations are more likely to be strongly deleterious, thus resulting in the significant yield loss in the first generation of selfed cassava plants 8,9 . These mutations were in genes (n = 7,774) exhibiting functional enrichment in primarily macromolecule catabolism and biosynthesis. In contrast, the deleterious mutations existing predominantly in the homozygous state (proportion of homozygotes >70%) were present in genes (n = 245) exhibiting functional enrichment in amine and ketone metabolism, as well as chemical and stimulus responses (Supplementary Fig. 14).Using deep sequencing from a comprehensive and representative collection of 241 cassava accessions, we developed HapMapII, l e t t e r s a valuable resource for cassava genetic studies and breeding. In this vegetatively propagated species, deleterious mutations have been accumulating rapidly, owing to limited recombination and a domestication bottleneck. Although breeding efforts have successfully maintained yield by selecting high-fitness haplotypes at several hundred loci and handling most damaging mutations in the heterozygous state, breeders have been unable to purge the mutation burden. Instead, they have shielded deleterious mutations by increasing the heterozygosity while screening thousands of potential hybrids (Supplementary Fig. 15). In the short term, this practice for managing mutation burden may produce gains in yield. In the long term, however, a mutational meltdown may be triggered by new mutations, decreasing genetic diversity in the breeding pool, and clonal propagation. Deleterious mutations should be important targets for future genetic research and breeding of cassava. In genetic research, mutations in fast-evolving regulatory regions must be evaluated by examining conservation from closely related species (divergence <5 Myr ago). In addition, dominance effects of deleterious mutations and the interactions among them must be qualified from populations; for breeding, dedicatedly designed crosses and selfing can be applied to eliminate deleterious mutations efficiently. Purging deleterious mutations from cassava, combined with genomic selection and genomic editing technologies 21 , should improve this globally important crop. A bottleneck during domestication increased the mutation burden by 26% (P = 9.1 × 10 −9 ). Demography in Africa had no significant influence on the mutation burden in African cassava accessions (P = 0.42). (b) Homozygous-mutation burden in cassava populations. Domestication decreased the homozygous-mutation burden in cultivated cassava by 23% (P = 7 × 10 −3 ). (c) Heterozygous-mutation burden in cassava populations. Domestication increased the heterozygous-mutation burden in cultivated cassava by 96% (P = 8.1 × 10 −7 ). (d) Comparison between the observed homozygous-mutation burden (n = 10,000) and the expected homozygousmutation burden (n = 10,000) under the assumption of HWE in cultivated cassava. (e) Comparison between the observed heterozygous-mutation burden (n = 10,000) and the expected heterozygous-mutation burden (n = 10,000) under the assumption of HWE in cultivated cassava.Samples and whole-genome sequencing. To maximize the diversity and representation for cassava, all samples were selected on the basis of breeders' choice and diversity analysis from accessions included in Next Generation Cassava Breeding project (URLs). Whole-genome sequences were generated from 241 cassava accessions including 203 elite breeding accessions, 16 progenitors (M. falbellifolia and M. peruviana) 2,3 , 11 hybrid/tree cassava accessions and 11 wild relative cassava accessions (M. glaziovii and others) (Supplementary Table 1). Wild M. glaziovii has been extensively used in cassava breeding programs to transfer disease-resistance alleles to cultivated cassava (for example, in the Amani Breeding Program) 10 . Among 241 cassava accessions, 172 accessions were sequenced at the Genomic Diversity Facility at Cornell University. Standard Illumina TruSeq PCR-free libraries were constructed with an insert size of 500 bp. Sequences of 200 bp in length were generated with the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform, and sequences of 150 bp in length were generated with NextSeq 500 Desktop sequencers. The Donald Danforth Plant Science Center generated ~20× coverage sequences for 15 elite cassava accessions. Sequences for the remaining 54 cassava accessions were collected from HapMapI 10 , generated at the University of California, Berkeley.The cassava genome was found to have large amounts of repeat sequences. The 518.5-Mb cassava genome (v6.1) has ~51% repetitive elements with several common recent retrotransposons 10 . To exclude misalignment and to ensure high-quality variant discovery, these repeats were prefiltered by aligning the reads to a bait 10 containing repeat sequences and organelle sequences (Supplementary Fig. 2). The Burrows-Wheeler alignment with maximal exact matches (BWA-MEM) algorithm 32 was used to align and filter repeat reads. We set the --c parameter option to 100,000 to maximize the power to detect repeat reads. Remaining reads after prefiltering were aligned to the reference genome (v6.1) 10 with BWA-MEM 32 with default parameters. All alignment files were converted to BAM format 33 . To perform high-quality variant calling and genotyping, especially for rare variants, we developed an in-house pipeline, FastCall (URLs), to perform stringent variant discovery. The alignment records were generated from alignment BAM files with the mpileup tool in Samtools 33 . The following procedures were included in FastCall: (i) genomic positions with both insertion and deletion variants were ignored, because these sites were probably in complex regions with many misalignments; (ii) for multiple allelic sites, if the third allele had more than 20% depth in any individual, the site was ignored; (iii) for a specific site, if the minor allele did not have a depth between 40% and 60% in at least one individual when the individual depth was greater than 5, the site was ignored; (iv) a chi-squared test for allele segregation 13 in all individuals was performed. Sites with P values greater than 1.0 × 10 −3 were ignored; (v) On average, over 30× depth was used for individual genotype calls.The genotype likelihood was calculated on the basis of a multinomial test, as previously described 34 . To remove potential spurious variants arising from paralogs, an additional filter was applied to keep only variants with a depth between 7,500 and 11,500 (Supplementary Fig. 4b). The missing data composed approximately 4%. The genotypes were imputed and phased into haplotypes with BEAGLE v4.1 (ref.12) with a default window size of 50,000 SNPs.Error-rate estimates of HapMapII. The cassava reference accession AM560-2 is a S3-derived inbred 11 . Therefore, few genetic polymorphisms were expected in the reference genome. The percentage of polymorphic sites across the reference genome was identified as the false-positive error rate of cassava HapMapII (Supplementary Fig. 4a). To estimate imputation accuracy, a total of 10% of the known genotypes (with a minimum read depth of 10) were masked before imputation with BEAGLE. The correlation (Pearson's r) between the imputed genotype and the masked genotype was calculated to evaluate the imputation error.Population genetic analysis. SNP density, pairwise nucleotide diversity (π), Tajima's D and the fixation index (F st ) were calculated with VCFtools 35 (Supplementary Table 2). SNP density was calculated in 100-kb nonoverlapping windows, Tajima's D and F st were calculated in 5-kb nonoverlapping windows. Values of π were calculated with variant and invariant sites. PCA was carried out with a distance matrix generated in in Trait Analysis by Association, Evolution and Linkage (TASSEL) 36 . Phylogenetic analysis was performed with the Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution (APE) package 37 in R software (Supplementary Fig. 6).Recombination-rate analysis. Genetic-linkage-map positions were obtained from the cassava HapMapI source 10 and the International Cassava Genetic Map Consortium (ICGMC) 38 . Genetic-linkage-map positions (in centimorgans) were projected to HapMapII sites through simple linear interpolation between the markers.Genomic evolutionary rate profiling (GERP). Constrained portions of the cassava genome were identified by quantifying rejected substitutions (strength of purifying selection) with the GERP++ program 16 . Multiple whole-genome sequence alignment was carried out for the seven species in the Malpighiales clade of the plant kingdom, including cassava, rubber (H. brasiliensis) 39 , jatropha (Jatropha curcas) 40 , castor bean (Ricinus communis) 41 , willow (Salix purpurea) 42 , flax (Linum usitatissimum) 43 , and poplar (Populus trichocarpa) 44 . Whole-genome alignment was carried out with the Large-Scale Genome Alignment Tool (LASTZ) 45 . Phylogenetic tree and neutral branch length (estimated from fourfold degenerate sites) analyses were used to quantify the constraint intensity at every position in the cassava genome. Cassava genome sequences were eliminated during the site-specific observed estimates (rejected substitution (RS) scores) to eliminate the confounding influence of deleterious derived alleles segregating in cassava populations present in the reference sequence.Identifying deleterious mutations. Amino acid substitutions and their effects on protein function were predicted with the SIFT algorithm 19 . Nonsynonymous mutations with SIFT scores <0.05 were defined as putative deleterious mutations. SIFT (<0.05) and GERP (>2) annotations were combined to identify the deleterious mutations in constrained portions of the genome. These deleterious mutations were used to calculate the cassava mutation burden.The rubber genome was used as an outgroup to identify the deleterious alleles in the cassava genome. At a given position, if a cassava reference allele matched the rubber reference allele, the allele in cassava was categorized as an ancient allele. If a cassava allele was different from the rubber allele, the cassava allele was defined as a derived allele. If the cassava genome was not aligned to the rubber genome, or both reference and alternative alleles did not match the rubber genome, that particular site was ignored. Reference accession (inbred, generation S3) and introgression lines were removed during estimation of mutation burden for each accession.Identifying selective sweep regions. The cross-population composite likelihood approach (XP-CLR) 27 was used to identify the selective sweeps for two comparisons: Latin America cassava accessions (test populations) versus progenitors (M. esculenta sp. flabelifolia, reference population) for domestication events, and African cassava accessions (test populations) versus Latin American cassava accessions (reference population) to assess recent improvement in Africa. A selection scan was performed across the genome with a 0.5-cM sliding window between the SNPs with a spacing of 2 kb. A genetic map of cassava generated by the International Cassava Genetic Map Consortium 38 was used in the XP-CLR analysis. XP-CLR scores were normalized with Z scores and a smoothed spline technique in the R package (GenWin) 46 . Outlier peaks were selected if they were above the ninety-ninth percentile of normalized values. AgriGO 47 and REVIGO 48 tools were used for gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis.Mutation burden in cassava accessions. The numbers of derived deleterious alleles present in cassava accessions were counted to identify the mutation burden in cassava accessions in three models (homozygous-mutation burden, heterozygous-mutation burden, and total mutation burden). The homozygous-mutation burden is the number of derived deleterious alleles in the homozygous state. The heterozygous-mutation burden is the number of derived deleterious alleles existing in the heterozygous state.The total mutation burden is the number of derived deleterious alleles existing in an accession (2× homozygous-mutation burden + heterozygousmutation burden) 15,49 .A bootstrap approach (with replacement) was used to resample cultivated cassava accessions from both Latin American (24 samples) and African (174 samples) breeding pools. The process was repeated 10,000 times to generate the distribution of expected homozygous and heterozygous-mutation burden. For each resampling, where b ho is the expected homozygous-mutation burden under HWE, b he is the expected heterozygous-mutation burden under HWE, n is the total number of deleterious mutations identified (n = 22,495), and d i is the allele frequency of the ith deleterious allele in the sampled population. The observed mutation burden was calculated for each accession, as described in the section 'Mutation burden in cassava accessions' . The means of observed homozygous and heterozygous mutation were used for the comparison.Statistical tests. The significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was determined by two-tailed Student's t tests. The difference between groups was tested by unpaired two-tailed Welch's t tests, assuming unequal variance between groups. n represents the sample size."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1180970367.json b/main/part_2/1180970367.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..365460a9313eb69a73ba47f5283d64e8e9ba96ab --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1180970367.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d0aa138fd4ceaabfedd7e242e08675a4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/0421e612-0133-4ee2-a86d-785561d07a6e/retrieve","id":"-819649615"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6459d71d-5c6e-4bb3-8c0a-097fe34a74e7","content":"En la última década, las variaciones climáticas relacionadas con el fenómeno de El Niño y La Niña han traído serios retos para la agricultura colombiana, demostrando que muchos agricultores no tienen la capacidad de manejar efectivamente el riesgo y de adaptarse a fluctuaciones climáticas y catástrofes. El cambio climático antropógeno probablemente exacerbe esta situación. Los científicos proyectan aumentos en la variabilidad climática, temperaturas más altas y precipitación errática.En Colombia, el aumento promedio previsto de la temperatura promedio anual para el 2050 se estima que sea de 2.5 °C; y es probable que la precipitación aumente en un 2.5% a mediados de siglo. De hecho, sin adaptación acelerada, el cambio climático resultaría en: • Degradación del suelo y pérdida de materia orgánica en las vertientes andinas. • Inundaciones en las costas Caribe y Pacífica. • Pérdidas de nichos para el café, los frutales, el cacao y el banano. • Cambios en la prevalencia de plagas y enfermedades. • Descongelamiento de glaciares y estrés hídrico.Las proyecciones indican que para el 2050, en la mayoría (>60%) de las áreas actualmente cultivadas se verá impactado probablemente el 80% de los cultivos, y los cultivos perennes de alto valor sufrirán el mayor impacto. Estas proyecciones tienen implicaciones socioeconómicas significativas: el sector agropecuario es responsable del 40% de las exportaciones colombianas, y el 21% de la población depende directamente de la agricultura como fuente de empleo. El cambio climático, por ende, tendría efectos de amplio alcance en la agroindustria, las cadenas de abastecimiento y la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional.Adicionalmente, los efectos del cambio climático tendrán su mayor impacto en los productores de escasos recursos y de pequeña escala. Los pequeños agricultores representan la gran mayoría de los productores de alimentos en Colombia. Entre los cultivos de exportación (que generan el 41% del PIB agrícola), solo la caña de azúcar se cultiva principalmente en grandes plantaciones. Entre el 50% y el 90% de los productores de cereales, café, cacao y musáceas (banano y plátano) son pequeños agricultores, cada uno con fincas de menos de 10 ha.¿Qué nos espera?Se estima que para el 2050, la temperatura promedio anual aumente en promedio 2.5 ºC, alcanzando un máximo de 2.7 ºC en el departamento de Arauca y un mínimo de 2 ºC en los departamentos de Chocó y Nariño. El impacto en la agricultura posiblemente será severo en las regiones o cultivos que experimenten aumentos de temperatura superiores a los 2.5 ºC (Cuadro 1).Las temperaturas más altas vendrán acompañadas del descongelamiento de glaciares en los Andes (que tal vez habrán desaparecido para el 2030) y la desaparición de páramos importantes (quizás el 56% ya no existan para el 2050) -ecosistemas que hoy son fuente importante de agua. Entretanto, la variabilidad de la precipitación anualEl cambio climático probablemente tendrá impactos significativos en el sector agropecuario en Colombia, responsable de más de una décima parte del PIB del país y fuente de empleo para más de una quinta parte de su población. Los análisis indican que para el 2050 es probable que se presenten aumentos significativos de la temperatura, precipitación más errática y mayor prevalencia de plagas y enfermedades. Para atender las múltiples implicaciones socioeconómicas de estos cambios, el gobierno debe priorizar la adaptación, invirtiendo en evaluaciones regionales, investigación y desarrollo, y transferencia de tecnologías a los agricultores y capacitación en su uso. Los períodos más secos durante todo el año posiblemente serán menos secos, mientras que los períodos más húmedos se intensificarían. Las proyecciones indican un aumento promedio del 2.5% a nivel nacional para el 2050, con un mínimo de cambio de -1.4% en el departamento de Cesar y un máximo de 5.6% en el departamento de Huila. Las únicas excepciones son las regiones secas de la costa Caribe, donde las disminuciones de precipitación anticipada constituyen una mayor causa de preocupación.Los científicos proyectan que el 36% de los productos agrícolas enfrentarán aumentos de precipitación de más del 3% en, por lo menos, el 60% de las áreas cultivadas. Los cambios en los patrones de precipitación pueden alterar las fechas de floración; afectar los factores bióticos (plagas, enfermedades, malezas) en diferentes sistemas de producción, con el consecuente aumento de los costos de producción; y alterar la disponibilidad de agua en el suelo. Las lluvias intensas pueden resultar en inundaciones, erosión del suelo y grandes pérdidas de cultivos. Esta situación se puede ver exacerbada en la costa Pacífica, donde una elevación del nivel del mar puede causar inundaciones y salinización de los suelos.La prevalencia de plagas y enfermedades ya ha aumentado, y es probable que la situación empeore con la agudización del cambio climático. Los cultivos actualmente afectados incluyen las musáceas (bananos, plátanos) en áreas por encima de los 500 msnm, el café en áreas por encima de los 1500 msnm, la papa en áreas por debajo de los 2500 msnm, así como el cacao, el maíz y la yuca. La intensificación del control químico puede representar altos costos económicos para los pequeños productores y costos a largo plazo para el agroecosistema.El calor, las tierras degradadas, la escasez de alimentos para animales (debido a la disminución de plantas resistentes al cambio climático) y la escasez de agua probablemente tendrán impacto en la ganadería. Los intentos de intensificar la producción ganadera pueden conducir inadvertidamente a enfermedades infecciosas en el ganado, lo que a su vez podrían afectar a agricultores y consumidores de carne.A nivel de finca: Los sistemas silvopastoriles (SSP) son una alternativa a los sistemas ganaderos tradicionales en América Latina, los cuales se han visto relacionados durante años con deforestación, erosión del suelo y pérdida de la biodiversidad. Por el contrario, los SSP mezclan vegetaciones perennes de enraizamiento profundo al sistema de producción pecuaria. La diversidad de plantas en los sistemas silvopastoriles -que a menudo combinan gramíneas terrestres, leguminosas arbustivas y especies leguminosas o maderables para proporcionar sombra-ofrecen mayor resiliencia a la variabilidad climática. Las plantas pueden entonces servir de suplemento dietético y de forraje alternativo. Se ha encontrado que la producción de leche y carne aumenta en los SSP. Estos sistemas también proveen servicios ambientales (reciclaje de nutrientes del suelo, secuestro de carbono, corredores y refugios para la biodiversidad), al tiempo que proporcionan sombra, conservando la humedad del suelo y reduciendo la temperatura para el ganado.agricultores frente a la volatilidad del clima, la adversidad y la pobreza. • Otras herramientas de transferencia de recursos económicos, como los subsidios, para incentivar la adopción de variedades resistentes, y prácticas agrícolas adaptativas, como por ejemplo los sistemas silvopastoriles (ver recuadro).En vista del grado de incertidumbre en cuanto a los efectos del cambio climático, Colombia debe continuar invirtiendo en modelación climática en diferentes escenarios, a escala geográfica detallada y a largo plazo. Conocer el grado en que diferentes sistemas, regiones y cultivos se podrían ver afectados permitiría que los científicos y los formuladores de políticas desarrollen planes de adaptación apropiados. Entretanto, se necesita más investigación para desarrollar cultivos resistentes al clima, a las plagas y a las enfermedades (ver el recuadro \"Arroz colombiano\" como ejemplo). La preservación de la agrobiodiversidad y de los recursos genéticos es crucial para este fin.Cambios en la fenología del cultivo y el Cambios en fechas de siembra y cosecha. Cambios en Café, musáceas, arroz de secano, maíz, soya, consiguiente impacto sobre el flujo de los infraestructura para cultivos perennes (riego, drenaje). fríjol, árboles frutales productos hacia los mercados y cadenas de abastecimiento Inundación de tierras agrícolas debido al Reubicación de actividades de acuerdo con los nuevos Palma de aceite africana (costa Pacífica), aumento en el nivel del mar y la salinización planes de ordenamiento territorial. Construcción de musáceas (Urabá) y ganadería (costa Caribe) de aguas subterráneas diques y barreras para prevenir la salinización y proteger los ecosistemas costeros.Cambios en plagas y enfermedades: Investigación en razas resistentes o tolerantes. Café (por debajo de los 1500 msnm), musáceas aumento de la prevalencia y desplazamiento Implementación de sistemas de monitoreo y de alerta (por debajo de los 500 msnm), papa (por encima a nuevas regiones temprana para poder implementar el manejo sostenible. de los 2500 msnm), yuca, árboles frutales Intensificación de los procesos de Manejo agronómico sostenible y mejorado para Papa y yuca en las laderas andinas, ganadería en degradación y desertificación de la tierra aumentar la resiliencia del suelo. las tierras bajas (Amazonia, Llanos Orientales, costa Caribe)Aumento en la vulnerabilidad de los Creación de subsidios de adaptación y de un sistema de Todos los cultivos (se deben atender primero los pequeños productores a la variabilidad del seguros agrícolas para los productores de vertientes y sectores con dispersión significativa dentro del clima y al cambio climático para las áreas muy secas del Caribe. La industria y el país) gobierno deben invertir en investigación, extensión y transferencia de tecnologías para apoyar a los pequeños productores.Financiación e incentivos gubernamentales para Prioridad: razas nativas silvestres y cultivadas de recursos fitogenéticos que actualmente estimular la conservación de recursos fitogenéticos. árboles frutales, y muchos parientes silvestres de estén mal representados o no se los esté Análisis de zonas de alto riesgo. Colección de recursos cultivos, incluyendo yuca, fríjol, papa y tomate, conservando ex situ genéticos. Priorización de las actividades que requieren entre otros. mejoramiento genético (siguiente columna).Investigación en material genético resistente al calor y Caña de azúcar, café (por encima de los cultivos y pasturas, y disminución de la programas de fitomejoramiento para los cultivos más 1500 msnm), papa (por debajo de los productividad, incluyendo el abandono de vulnerables. Desarrollo de nuevas prácticas para sistemas 2500 msnm), musáceas (por debajo de los las tierras agrícolas actuales agrícolas que puedan soportar temperaturas más altas. 500 msnm), cítricos (tierras altas), ganaderíaUno de los mayores obstáculos para el mejoramiento del arroz en América Latina y otras regiones es el estancamiento del rendimiento potencial del cultivo, que el fitomejoramiento convencional no ha podido superar. Diversas plagas y enfermedades importantes, en tierras bajas y altas, y la prevalencia de suelos ácidos infértiles en las zonas altas son factores que explican esta brecha de rendimientos experimentales. Los investigadores están trabajando para cerrar esta brecha ampliando la base genética de la producción de arroz e incorporando características útiles a partir de los parientes silvestres. Por ejemplo, híbridos entre las especies silvestres de Oryza y las variedades mejoradas han dado progenie con rendimientos entre el 10% y el 20% superiores a sus parientes cultivados.También se están evaluando líneas de arroz con otras características, tales como arquitectura de planta, tipo de grano y resistencia a los estreses bióticos y abióticos. Específicamente, los científicos han usado el fitomejoramiento y la investigación en patología para desarrollar cultivos con resistencia durable a plagas y enfermedades. La diversidad de las cepas de muchos patógenos, que les permite mutar, diversificarse y duplicarse rápidamente, complica esta tarea y hace más difícil desarrollar cultivos con la resistencia adecuada.Entre 1967 y 2005, Colombia liberó 41 variedades de arroz, con beneficios económicos estimados en cientos de millones de dólares estadounidenses, gracias al aumento en los rendimientos y a la reducción de los gastos en pesticidas. Las variedades recientemente desarrolladas son resistentes a sogata, hoja blanca y añublo del arroz, tres de las plagas y enfermedades más destructivas de este cultivo. El gobierno debe formular un Plan Nacional de Adaptación con objetivos claros que definan y asignen tareas, e identifique las necesidades de inversión y los flujos financieros El plan debe priorizar específicamente:1. Evaluaciones de impacto regionales, detalladas y comprensivas.2. Evaluaciones de vulnerabilidad de los sistemas de producción agropecuaria cruciales para las exportaciones nacionales y la seguridad alimentaria rural.3. Investigación e iniciativas de desarrollo, incluyendo modelación climática y fitomejoramiento.4. Capacitación de agricultores y transferencia de tecnología. La adopción puede requerir políticas que tengan en cuenta la escasez de recursos de los pequeños productores (por ejemplo, sistemas de seguros agrícolas, subsidios por la tierra).En todos los casos, los datos y la información deben ser públicos para facilitar tanto la investigación sobre el clima como el intercambio de conocimientos institucionales y tradicionales."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1181080342.json b/main/part_2/1181080342.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..91dd05a7df801838490ccf1b66e6bc9f631b4b30 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1181080342.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"240a19719f433b20b9c86630cb40f18c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fcd425d1-621f-4da8-bd69-cba25912afe3/retrieve","id":"336636105"},"keywords":["A, AGUAT, ANSM, ARIZ, ASU, BAA, BAB, BAFC, BM, BR, BRIT, CAS, CHAPA, CICY, COL, CORD, CPUN, CR, CS, CUZ, DAV, DS, DUKE, EBUM, ECON, ENCB, F, FI, G, GH, HAO, HNMN, HUT, IBUG, IEB, INB, K, L, LAGU, LIL, LL, LPB, M, MA, MEXU, MICH, MO, MOL, NA, NCU, NY, O, P, PH, PMA, POM, PRG, QCA, RB, RSA, SI, TEX, UC, UCR, US, USJ, USM, UVAL, WIS albescens, 2 racèmes, en floraison, j go. [MEXU","27-I-2011]. UCR75254. /// Plantas de México: Edo. de Colima. (Macroptilium) [barré]. Phaseolus lunatus L.. Rancho El Jabalí, aprox albescens, en go sèches, graines, 6 racèmes, B1 elliptiques étroites acuminées presque linéaires 5 mm long 1 mm large, qq go avec fines stries violettes. [MEXU","27-I-2011] Phaseolus. Bejuco herbácea, en malezas. /// Base de datos Phaseolinae [cachet à l'encre bleue]. /// Herbario Nacional (MEXU). Phaseolus albescens A. Delgado & R. Ramírez-Delgadillo, det. A. Delgado, 2008. /// DGD: albescens, 3 racèmes, en j go en transition à go vertes. [MEXU","27-I-2011] Phaseolus costaricensis, et c'est l'holotype","en floraison, 2 racèmes, jgo. [US","12-V-1997] costaricensis, isotype, 2 racèmes, en floraison, jgo. [UC","22-X-2003] costaricensis, en floraison, jgo, un seul très grand racème vigoureux","pas d'indication de site. [SI","22-IV-1988]"],"sieverID":"c6c2c8dc-433a-40a5-9b2d-9b2672cc177d","content":"was mutually agreed with the Editor of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas that the monograph should not exceed 300 pages. We had a lot of specimens that the two of us had seen and annotated together in Mayagüez, or separately. We agreed with the Editor that at least an identification list should be in the monograph (pages 291-294), so Curators of Herbaria would have identifications for the specimens they kindly allowed us to see. Since 2002 more Herbaria have been visited (see full list at the end of this explanatory note) by myself and more specimens have been annotated. Obviously few journals would accept the publication of these records in full. The publication of these 'note books of phaseology' on the web site of the genebank of CIAT where the largest collection of beans is currently maintained, was one way to put that information available to the public. This file is periodically updated as more visits to Herbaria increase the number of specimens of species belonging to this section.weedy forms, not to the beans grown anywhere on purpose by people). For each country, the alphabetical order of currently acknowledged departments/ provinces/ states is followed. Within each department/ province/ state the specimens are presented by alphabetical order of names of collectors, the first family name coming first when applicable. If there are many specimens by the same collector(s), the lowest collecting numbers will come first. When there are many specimens with the same collecting number, the alphabetical order of the Herbaria keeping these specimens is followed. The specimens used as types (with indications in red and in bold face about the kind of types) immediately follow the introduction of the species name. There are two reasons for this: for the taxonomist the type contributes to the validation of the species (and we know straight which species we are talking about), and if a user looks for the type(s) it will be faster to look for it (them) at a specific location in the files throughout the sections rather than to look for it (them) by geographical area. Logically the holotype comes first. The types of species put in synonymy will logically follow, in alphabetical order of the names of these species, unless they were not validly published, and in this case these specimens will be in the general list (as usually Curators of Herbaria proceed). In a few cases, the type specimens are followed by specimens for which there is no geographical information. In cases where only the country has been indicated, then the specimens will be at the top of the list before the first department/ province/ state listed alphabetically.All notes found on the voucher specimen on the day of visit are taken in the way they have been written (trying to respect the original to the extent possible), and written down along a time sequence starting with the oldest annotation (sometimes deciding which is the oldest annotation is an educated guess, but color of labels and inks and kinds of typewriters or printers help). For easy reference, the information starts with the number of the voucher with the acronym of the Herbarium visited when applicable. Please note that some Herbaria did not number their voucher specimens. In this case there might be only a stamp indicating the Herbarium where the specimen is currently kept. Each piece of information found on a label or written directly on the cardboard is separated from the next one by a slash sign repeated three times (///). Please note that a stamp might be included in the sequence of information, since it can provide useful information about the date of a specimen if not indicated in the main label. The most recent labels in the sequence usually refer to the identification of the specimen by taxonomists and are presented in chronological order, the earliest identification coming first. The sequence of sets of data finishes with the author's determination (introduced by author's initials), with a few notes about the specimen. In the notes, attention is drawn on the size/ richness of the specimens, usually through the number of racemes. In view of possible future collecting (e.g. matching with the date of collection), there is an indication about the phenology, whether the specimen was seen with flowers and/ or young/ green/ dry pods and/ or seeds. The notes end with the acronym of the visited Herbarium and the date (as day/ month/ year) when the specimen was studied (that date can be validated by consulting the records of visitors of each Herbarium); so the reader knows where that specimen can be studied/ asked for study. A specimen might have been seen on two visits, and thus two dates will be indicated in chronological order. The indication [x2] or [x3] means that the specimen exists as two or three sheets; if there is anything noteworthy, then the second or third sheet will be treated as another specimen.Because the coordinates could be critical for studies in phytogeography or in evaluation against abiotic stresses, if the coordinates were given on the (main) label, they are reported directly. If there none and if the location is precise enough, an estimate is provided, usually for the first collecting number; because it is an indirect data provided by the author, it will be written down in square brackets []. Similarly, given its importance in order to see the material one more time in its original habitat, if provided in abbreviated form or numerical form that could lead to confusion, the date might be reconfirmed in square brackets (in the format day/ month/ year), usually for the first collecting number. This confirmation is often possible because the author has explored the same area for the same species. Other notes such as appreciation/ interpretation of anything relevant on the labels will appear also in square brackets, so that the reader understands that this is not an original data. In some cases it was felt necessary to add [col.] to indicate clearly the name of the collector; similarly [det.] was added to indicate clearly the name of the taxonomist identifying the specimen. If both indications are without square brackets, it means that they were written as such on the label(s). Sometimes critical information, for example the name of the species or the collecting number might be missing and the author has seen a void space; this situation is reflected in the notes by [blanc] 'void'.For easy reference only, the name of the state/ department/ province will appear green (the black font of the original name has been turned green), and the name of the (main) collector and his/ her collecting number will appear blue (the black font of the original name has been turned blue). Note that the original black font can be reversed easily, so the user sees the original data as they were on the label(s). Similarly, all back slash signs could be eliminated to restore the original information found on the label(s).One should keep in mind that the author deals with specimens as individual cases and single sets of data, and on every visit as a novel case. This explains why specimens by the same collector(s) with the same collecting number are repeated in the list. The opinion of other taxonomists on the studied specimen is their, and the way Curators mounted plant parts and presented the labels is their too. That stated, the reader will notice some interesting convergences (or discrepancies) in the works of these different professionals.The reader will find the specimens seen by the author in alphabetical order of the species: P. albescens, P. costaricensis, P. debouckii, P. dumosus, P. persistentus and P. vulgaris. P. debouckii was included following the work by Rendón-Anaya et al. 2017 (in Phytotaxa 313 (3): 259-266). About P. dumosus the reader will find wild and weedy forms, the latter being found in wellestablished second growth forests (the records from South America), not from cultivated fields. P. persistentus was included into this section following the data given by A. Delgado-Salinas, R. Bibler & M. Lavin. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot. 31 (4): 779-791. P. vulgaris was treated as in the monograph without naming botanical varieties, focusing on wild forms, with the mention of a few weedy types (namely when found in the folders of wild forms in some Herbaria); cultivated types were excluded. In many cases, since the collector(s) does (do) not clearly state the biological status of the specimen at the collection site and on the label, the specimen is confirmed as wild ('sauvage') in the author's notes because this confirmation is critical for the future use of the data. updated 2/12/2019. Introducción a los 'Cahiers de Phaséologie'sección Phaseoli DC emend. Freytag.Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) AA 6713 Cali COLOMBIA; d.debouck@cgiar.org NOTA ACLARATORIAMientras con el Dr. George F. Freytag estábamos finalizando la monografía (Freytag, G.F. & D.G. Debouck. 2002. Taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) in North America, Mexico and Central America. SIDA , se acordó mutuamente con el Editor del Botanical Research Institute of Texas que el texto final no debería sobrepasar el límite de 300 páginas. Teníamos muchos especímenes que habíamos examinado y anotado conjuntamente en Mayagüez, o de manera independiente. Acordamos con el Editor que por lo menos una lista de los especímenes con las identificaciones estuviera en la monografía (páginas 291-294), para que los Curadores de los Herbarios tuvieran las identificaciones de los especímenes que amablemente nos permitieron estudiar. Desde 2002 más Herbarios fueron visitados (véase una lista completa al final de esta nota aclaratoria) de mi parte y más especímenes fueron anotados. Por razones obvias pocas revistas científicas aceptarían de publicar estos registros de manera completa. La publicación de estos 'Cuadernos de Faseología' en el sitio internet del banco de germoplasma del CIAT donde se conserva actualmente la mayor colección de fríjoles, era una manera lógica de meter esta información al alcance del público. El presente archivo es actualizado periódicamente cuando nuevas visitas a los Herbarios aumentan el número de especímenes de las especies perteneciendo a esta sección.La lista de los especímenes examinados por el autor en los Herbarios viene organizada de acuerdo con las secciones del género Phaseolus tales como se las reconoce en la monografía (op. cit.). La razón detrás de esta organización de los datos es práctica, por los números de especímenes estudiados, especialmente para las secciones que incluyen el fríjol común (es decir los Phaseoli) o el fríjol Lima (es decir los Paniculati). Para dar una información actualizada a los usuarios, la fecha del documento (la cual se encuentra al final del archivo) es la fecha de la cargada de los datos de cualquier espécimen de esta sección estudiado en el último Herbario visitado. Directamente después del título se encuentra la lista de los Herbarios y Museos de Historia Natural que conservan especímenes de esta sección en sus colecciones; estos Herbarios y Museos vienen mencionados en orden alfabético con los acrónimos de 'Index Herbariorum'. Dentro de cada sección, la información se presenta por cada especie reconocida actualmente como válida, y en orden alfabético de las especies para esta sección. Para cada especie la presentación sigue el orden alfabético de los países donde esta especie crece naturalmente (este cuaderno trata únicamente de las especies y formas silvestres, no de los fríjoles sembrados a propósito por la gente en cualquier parte del mundo). Para cada país, se sigue el orden alfabético de los departamentos/ estados/ provincias actualmente reconocidos para este país. Dentro de cada departamento/ estado/ provincia, los especímenes se presentan en el orden alfabético de los apellidos de los colectores, considerando el primer apellido cuando aplica. Si se reporta varios especímenes de un mismo colector, el reporte arranca con los números de colecta menores. Cuando hay varios especímenes con el mismo número de colecta, estos se presentan en el orden alfabético de los Herbarios (por sus acrónimos) que conservan estos especímenes. Los especímenes que fueron usados como tipos (indicados en rojo reforzado y según la categoría de tipos, el holotipo siendo el primero) se presentan directamente después del nombre de la especie. Hay dos razones detrás de esta presentación: primero, para el taxónomo el tipo es parte de la validación de la especie (y por lo tanto se sabe de cuál especie se trata), y segundo, en el caso que un usuario busca un tipo, será más rápido buscarlo en un lugar preciso del archivo (y esto para todas las secciones) en comparación a una búsqueda por área geográfica. Los tipos de las especies que fueron puestas en sinonimia siguen, en orden alfabético de los nombres de las especies, a menos que no hayan sido publicados de manera válida. En este último caso, los especímenes se ubican en la lista general (de la misma manera como lo hacen los Curadores). En algunos casos, los especímenes tipo vienen seguidos por aquellos especímenes por los cuales no hay información geográfica. En los casos donde sólo aparece el nombre del país, entonces estos especímenes vienen al inicio (en espera de más información) antes del primer departamento/ estado/ provincia mencionado en orden alfabético.Todas las notas que se encontraron escritas sobre cada espécimen en el día de la visita fueron registradas de la manera más cercana al original, y vienen reportadas en una secuencia temporal arrancando con la anotación más antigua. Decidir cuál era la anotación más antigua no fue siempre fácil, pero el color de las etiquetas y de las tintas y los tipos de máquinas de escribir y de las impresoras ayudaron. Para una referencia rápida, la información arranca con el número del ejemplar con el acrónimo del Herbario visitado cuando aplica. Hay que mencionar que algunos Herbarios no numeran sus especímenes. En este caso puede haber sólo el sello del Herbario donde el espécimen está conservado. Cada elemento de información que se encuentra escrito en una etiqueta o directamente sobre la cartulina viene separado del siguiente por una barra oblicua repetida tres veces (///). Favor notar que un sello puede ser incluido en la secuencia de informaciones porque puede dar una información útil sobre la edad de un espécimen si ésta no viene indicada en la etiqueta principal. Las etiquetas más recientes en la secuencia se refieren usualmente a la identificación del espécimen por parte de los taxónomos, y vienen en orden cronológico, la identificación más temprana siendo la primera. La secuencia de grupos de datos termina con la identificación de parte del autor (introducida por sus iniciales), con algunas notas sobre el espécimen. En estas notas, se llama la atención sobre el tamaño/ riqueza del espécimen, usualmente mediante el número de racimos. Con miras a futuras colectas y en correspondencia con la fecha de la colecta, se da una indicación de fenología, si el espécimen tiene flores y/o vainas jóvenes y/o vainas verdes y/o vainas secas y/o semillas. Las notas terminan con el acrónimo del Herbario visitado y con la fecha (en formato día/mes/ año) del estudio del espécimen durante la visita (esta fecha puede ser comprobada consultando los libros de registro de visitantes de cada Herbario). En consecuencia el lector sabe dónde un espécimen preciso puede ser estudiado o solicitado en prestamo. Un espécimen puede haber sido estudiado en dos fechas, y en consecuencia dos fechas aparecen, en orden cronológico. La indicación [x2] o [x3] significa que el espécimen existe como dos o tres ejemplares; si existe cualquier detalle que amerita ampliación de notas, entonces el segundo o tercer ejemplar será tratado como cualquier otro espécimen.Porque las coordenadas geográficas pueden ser de importancia crítica para los estudios de fitogeografía o evaluación contra estrés abióticos, en el caso que las coordenadas fueron escritas en la etiqueta (principal), se las reporta directamente. Si no hay coordenadas y en el caso que el lugar de colecta esté suficientemente preciso, se dan unas coordenadas estimadas, usualmente para el primer número de colecta. Porque se trata de datos indirectos dados por el autor, estarán escritos entre corchetes cuadrados []. De igual manera, por su importancia para volver a ver el material en su sitio original, especialmente si ha sido dada de manera abreviada o en forma numérica que puede prestarse a confusiones, la fecha puede ser re-confirmada en corchetes cuadrados (en el formato día/ mes/ año), usualmente para el primer número de colecta. Esta confirmación ha sido posible en varios casos porque el autor ha explorado la misma área para la misma especie. Otras notas tales como apreciaciones o interpretaciones de cualquier palabra escrita sobre la etiqueta y que sea relevante aparecerán también entre corchetes cuadrados, de tal manera que el lector entiende que no son datos originales. En algunos casos se vio la necesidad de añadir la abreviación [col.] para indicar claramente el nombre del colector de la muestra; de igual manera a veces fue necesario añadir la abreviación [det.] para indicar claramente el nombre del taxónomo quien identificó el material. En el caso que ambas abreviaciones estén sin corchetes cuadrados, esta situación significa que fueron escritas como tales en la etiqueta. A veces una información crítica, por ejemplo el nombre de la especie o el número de colecta puede estar faltando y el autor ha visto un espacio dejado en blanco; esta situación viene reflejada en las notas con la indicación [blanc] 'blanco' donde corresponde.Para referencia rápida solamente, el nombre del departamento/ estado/ provincia aparecerá en verde (la letra original negra ha sido cambiada a verde), y el nombre del colector (principal) y su número de colecta aparecerán en azul (la letra original negra ha sido cambiada a azul). Favor notar que la letra original negra puede revertirse fácilmente, para que el usuario vea los datos originales tales como estaban en la(s) etiqueta(s). De igual manera, todas las barras en oblicuo pueden ser eliminadas para volver a la información original de la(s) etiqueta(s).Es importante guardar en mente que el autor trata los especímenes como casos individuales y como conjuntos de datos por separado, y en cada visita como casos nuevos. Esta aproximación explica por qué los especímenes colectados por el mismo colector y con el mismo número de colecta se repiten en la lista. La opinión de otros taxónomos sobre el espécimen estudiado les pertenece, y la manera como los Curadores montan la muestra y presentan los datos igualmente pertenece a ellos. Bajo este entendimiento, el lector observará unas convergencias (o diferencias) interesantes en el trabajo de estos diferentes profesionales.El lector encontrará los especímenes estudiados por el autor en el orden alfabético de las especies: P. albescens, P. costaricensis, P. debouckii, P. dumosus, P. persistentus and P. vulgaris. P. debouckii fue incluido siguiendo el trabajo de Rendón-Anaya et al. 2017 (in Phytotaxa 313 (3): 259-266). Con relación a P. dumosus, el lector encontrará formas silvestres y formas malezas, estas últimas creciendo en bosque secundarios ya establecidos (los registros para América del Sur), pero no en campos cultivados. P. persistentus fue incluido en esta sección de acuerdo con los datos de A. Delgado-Salinas, R. Bibler & M. Lavin. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot. 31 (4): 779-791. El tratamiento de P. vulgaris fue igual a lo aplicado en la monografía sin nombrar variedades botánicas, enfocándose sobre las formas silvestres y con la mención de algunas formas malezas (se dio esta situación cuando las muestras estaban en la misma carpeta en el Herbario visitado); los materiales cultivados fueron excluidos. En muchos casos donde el colector no aclara el estado biológico del material en el sitio de colecta y en la etiqueta, se confirmó en las notas del autor que el espécimen era silvestre ('sauvage') porque esta confirmación tiene gran importancia para el uso futuro de los datos.actualizado el 2/12/2019. Au moment de finir la monographie avec George F. Freytag (Freytag, G.F. & D.G. Debouck. 2002. Taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) in North America, Mexico and Central America. SIDA , un accord avait été conclu avec l'Editeur du Botanical Research Institute of Texas que la monographie ne devrait pas compter plus de 300 pages. Il y avait cependant un grand nombre de spécimens sur lesquels nous avions des observations et des notes prises soit ensemble à Mayagüez, soit séparément. Nous étions d'accord avec l'Editeur qu'au moins une liste des identifications soit présente dans la monographie (pages 291-294), afin que les Curateurs des Herbiers puissent avoir les identifications des spécimens qu'ils avaient eu l'amabilité de soumettre à notre examen. Depuis 2002 j'ai eu l'occasion de visiter d'autres Herbiers (la liste complète se trouve à la fin de cette note explicative) et de prendre des notes sur un plus grand nombre de spécimens. Pour des raisons évidentes peu de revues scientifiques accepteraient de publier ces notes dans leur entièreté. La publication de ces 'cahiers de phaséologie' sur le site internet de la banque de gènes du CIAT où la plus grande collection de haricots est actuellement conservée, était une façon de mettre ces informations à la disposition du public. Ce fichier est mis à jour périodiquement quand de nouvelles visites aux Herbiers permettent d'augmenter le nombre de spécimens des espèces appartenant à cette section.La liste des spécimens étudiés dans les Herbiers par l'auteur est organisée en suivant les sections du genre Phaseolus telles qu'elles sont reconnues dans la monographie (op. cit.). La raison pour cette organisation des données est pratique, étant donné le grand nombre de spécimens étudiés, particulièrement pour les sections qui contiennent le haricot commun (c'est-à-dire les Phaseoli) ou le haricot de Lima (c'est-à-dire les Paniculati). Dans le but de donner une information actualisée aux usagers, la date du document (qui se trouve à la fin du fichier) est celle du transfert des données de n'importe quel spécimen de cette section après la dernière visite d'un Herbier. Directement après le titre se trouve la liste des Herbiers et Muséums d'Histoire Naturelle qui conservent des spécimens de cette section dans leurs collections; ces Herbiers sont signalés en ordre alphabétique par les acronymes signalés dans 'Index Herbariorum'. Dans chaque section, l'information est présentée pour chacune des espèces actuellement valide, et dans l'ordre alphabétique des espèces de cette section. Pour chaque espèce la présentation suit l'ordre alphabétique des pays où l'espèce croît naturellement (ce cahier se réfère seulement aux espèces et formes sauvages de haricot, et non aux haricots plantés à dessein où que ce soit par les humains). Pour chaque pays, l'ordre alphabétique des départements/ états/ provinces actuellement connu(e)s est suivi. Pour chaque département/ état/ province, les spécimens sont présentés dans l'ordre alphabétique des noms des collecteurs, le premier nom de famille étant considéré en premier lieu. Au cas où plusieurs spécimens ont été collectés par le(s) même(s) collecteur(s), les moindres numéros de collecte viennent en premier lieu. Dans le cas où plusieurs spécimens sont présents avec le même numéro de collecte, l'ordre alphabétique des Herbiers conservant ces spécimens sera suivi. Les spécimens qui ont été utilisés comme types (avec indication en rouge renforcé pour la nature des types) viennent directement après la mention du nom de l'espèce. Il y a deux raisons pour cette situation: pour le taxonomiste le type contribue à la validation de l'espèce (et par conséquent on sait directement de quelle espèce il s'agit), et d'autre part dans le cas où un usager cherche un type la recherche sera plus rapide si le type occupe un endroit déterminé dans les fichiers plutôt que de devoir le chercher par origine géographique. Logiquement l'holotype vient en premier lieu. Les types des espèces placées en synonymie viendront ensuite, dans l'ordre alphabétique des noms d'espèces, à moins qu'elles n'aient pas été publiées de façon valide, et dans ce cas les spécimens se trouveront dans la liste générale (comme le font d'habitude les Curateurs des Herbiers). Dans quelques cas, les spécimens type sont suivis par les spécimens pour lesquels il n'y a pas d'information géographique. Dans les cas où le pays est indiqué sans plus d'information, ces spécimens suivent l'indication du pays et sont placés avant ceux avec département/ état/ province connu(e), par ordre alphabétique.Toutes les notes trouvées sur chaque planche d'herbier le jour de la visite ont été enregistrées comme elles ont été écrites, en respectant l'original le plus fidèlement possible, et ont été présentées en séquence chronologique en commençant par la note la plus ancienne. Décider quelle était la note la plus ancienne fut parfois un choix difficile, mais les couleurs des étiquettes et des encres et le type de machines à écrire ou imprimantes ont aidé. Pour une référence facile, l'information rapportée commence par le numéro de la planche d'herbier avec l'acronyme ou le nom de l'Herbier visité suivant le cas. Il faut noter que certains Herbiers ne numérotent pas leurs planches. Dans ce cas il peut y avoir seulement un cachet indiquant l'Herbier où le spécimen est actuellement conservé. Chaque groupe d'informations sur une étiquette ou écrites directement sur la planche est séparé du suivant par une barre oblique répétée trois fois (///). Il convient de noter qu'un cachet peut être inclus dans la séquence d'informations, car il peut apporter une information utile sur l'âge d'un spécimen si ce renseignement ne figure pas sur l'étiquette principale. Les étiquettes les plus récentes dans la séquence se réfèrent généralement à l'identification du spécimen par les taxonomistes et cette identification est présentée dans l'ordre chronologique, la plus ancienne identification venant en premier. La séquence des groupes d'informations se termine par l'identification de la part de l'auteur (introduite par ses initiales), avec quelques notes sur le spécimen. Dans ces notes, l'attention se porte sur la taille/ abondance du spécimen, mesurée d'habitude par le nombre de racèmes. En vue d'une collecte future éventuelle et en correspondance avec la date de collecte, il y a une indication de phénologie, si le spécimen provient d'une plante en floraison, et/ ou avec des jeunes gousses (jgo), et/ ou avec des gousses vertes (go vertes), et/ ou avec des gousses sèches (go sèches) et/ ou avec des graines. Ces notes se terminent avec l'acronyme de l'Herbier visité et la date (en format jour/ mois/ année) de l'étude du spécimen (cette date peut être validée en consultant le registre des visiteurs de chaque Herbier). De cette façon le lecteur sait où un spécimen peut être étudié ou demandé en prêt pour étude. Un spécimen peut avoir été étudié au cours de deux visites, et par conséquent deux dates en ordre chronologique seront indiquées. L'indication [x2] or [x3] signifie que le spécimen a été trouvé monté sur deux ou trois planches; au cas où il y a quoique ce soit d'intéressant, la seconde ou la troisième planche sera considérée comme un autre spécimen.Comme les coordonnées géographiques peuvent être de valeur critique pour des études de phytogéographie ou d'évaluation pour les stress abiotiques, si ces coordonnées ont été écrites sur l'étiquette (principale), elles seront rapportées directement. Au cas où les coordonnées sont absentes et si le lieu de collecte est suffisamment précis, une estimation des coordonnées est fournie, d'habitude pour le premier numéro de collecte; comme il s'agit d'une donnée indirecte fournie par l'auteur, cette estimation des coordonnées sera écrite entre crochets []. Pareillement, étant donné son importance pour retrouver le matériel dans son site original, la date de collecte, surtout si elle se trouve sous forme abréviée ou sous une forme qui peut prêter à confusion, peut être reconfirmée entre crochets (dans le format jour/ mois/ année), d'habitude pour le premier numéro de collecte. Cette confirmation est souvent possible parce que l'auteur a exploré la même zone géographique pour la même espèce. D'autres notes comme des appréciations ou interprétations d'écritures sur les étiquettes figureront aussi entre crochets, de sorte que le lecteur comprend qu'il ne s'agit pas de données originales. Dans quelques cas il s'est avéré nécessaire d'ajouter l'abréviation [col.] pour indiquer clairement le nom du collecteur; pareillement l'abréviation [det.] a été ajoutée pour indiquer clairement le nom du taxonomiste qui a identifié le spécimen. Si ces deux abréviations existent sans crochets, cela signifie qu'elles ont été écrites comme telles sur l'étiquette. Parfois une information critique, comme par exemple le nom de l'espèce ou le numéro de collecte, est manquante, et l'auteur a trouvé un espace blanc à cet endroit; cette situation est reflétée dans les notes par l'indication [blanc].Pour la facilité de référence et détection, le nom du département/ état/ province apparaîtra en vert (la lettre originale en noir a été convertie en vert), et le nom du collecteur et son numéro de collecte apparaîtra en bleu (la lettre originale en noir a été convertie en bleu). La conversion à la lettre originale en noir est facile et permet de retrouver les données originales comme sur l'étiquette. Pareillement, toutes les barres obliques peuvent être éliminées pour retrouver les informations originales trouvées sur l'(les) étiquette(s).Il convient de se souvenir que l'auteur traite chaque spécimen comme un cas particulier et chaque groupe d'informations sur une étiquette comme un groupe indépendant, et à chaque visite comme un nouveau cas. Ceci explique pourquoi les spécimens trouvés par le(s) même(s) collecteur(s) avec le même numéro de collecte sont répétés dans la liste. L'opinion d'autres taxonomistes sur le spécimen étudié est leur opinion, et la façon dont les Curateurs présentent les étiquettes et montent les matériels leur appartient également. Ceci précisé, le lecteur constatera des convergences (ou des différences) intéressantes dans le travail de ces différents professionnels.Le lecteur trouvera ci-après les spécimens étudiés par l'auteur dans l'ordre alphabétique des espèces: P. albescens, P. costaricensis, P. debouckii, P. dumosus, P. persistentus et P. vulgaris. P. debouckii a été inclus suivant le travail de Rendón-Anaya et al. 2017 (in Phytotaxa 313 (3): 259-266). A propos de P. dumosus, le lecteur trouvera des formes sauvages et rudérales, ces dernières souvent établies dans des forêts secondaires (les registres pour l'Amérique du Sud), mais ne provenant pas de champs cultivés. P. persistentus a été inclus dans cette section suivant les résultats de A. Delgado-Salinas, R. Bibler & M. Lavin. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot. 31 (4): 779-791. P. vulgaris a été traité comme dans la monographie sans faire de distinction entre les variétés botaniques, en se concentrant sur les formes sauvages, avec la mention occasionnelle de quelques formes rudérales (notamment si ces spécimens se trouvaient confondus avec les formes sauvages dans les mêmes casiers des Herbiers); les plantes cultivées ont été exclues. Dans plusieurs cas, quand le collecteur n'a pas clairement défini le statut biologique du spécimen au site de collecte et sur l'étiquette, le spécimen a été confirmé comme 'sauvage' dans les notes de l'auteur du fait de l'importance de cette information pour l'usage ultérieur des données. actualisé 2/12/2019. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1186193558.json b/main/part_2/1186193558.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6bab749b6fc560fcfcbd65aa0d22f9db110e4cf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1186193558.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3fb088c94e73e600d413f1ffcd69d728","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7f6e9712-aa73-4aa7-bef5-895e902a1d47/retrieve","id":"-982964544"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"578a6328-3bdf-463f-917e-6d29c4b4e164","content":"From 1 to 5 October, the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) organized a review and planning workshop for the East and Southern Africa Project of the Africa RISING Program with the intention to capitalize on early project activities, to produce a work plan, to form research teams and to garner feedback about the plans formulated from partners.In the first three days the participants heard about the 11 early win projects that took place in the first year of the program. They drew lessons out of these projects around partnerships, cross-cutting issues, market access, agroforestry and a few other areas. They listened to the key constraints enunciated by District Agricultural Officers from Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia and formed multi-disciplinary groups to develop research questions addressing these constraints. They finally reformed as groups working on interactions between crop, soil/water and livestock to formulate research hypotheses and activities that could form a program of action for year 2.On day 4, a field visit to Babati was organized, with stop-overs in two very diverse villages: Maramboi, a village dominated by pastoralists and Gichameda, a village benefitting from an irrigated scheme.On the final day, ten representatives of development partner organizations came to hear the plans and comment on them.The plans were not detailed sufficiently as they listed a number of research options from which to develop research teams. These ideas form the basis for the formulation of refined research action plans with tangible activities starting with the planting season in Tanzania in November. This report features the main discussion points, decisions, next steps and links to all presentations and documents shared during the meeting.From 1 to 5 October, the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) organized a review and planning workshop for the East & Southern Africa Project of the Africa RISING Program.The workshop aimed to:1. Capitalize on early win projects to inform planning for the next year(s) 2. Develop an action plan for the next year (October 2012 -September 2013) 3. Form research teams 4. Receive feedback from a wider stakeholder group about the plans formulatedThe first three days gathered all research teams from the inception period, while the last two days brought together a wider set of development partners to review the plans elaborated in the first few days.The workshop was facilitated by Ewen Le Borgne from the International Livestock Research Institute. After introducing participants to one another and the workshop agenda, Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon presented a review of the first year of the Africa RISING project in the region.In her presentation, Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon presented a chronology of events that led to this review and planning event: This presentation was an opportunity to remind everyone that Africa RISING is a commitment for another four years. The core of the activities for the first year was however the early win projects, which were introduced in the next session.By batches of three or four projects, all early win project proponents presented what their project was about, what insights it brought forward as well as lessons learnt and other elements to take into account. After the presentations, participants got a chance to ask additional questions. The early win projects are listed in the table below. In addition to these early win projects, a grant was given to MSU to expand on some of their work in Malawi and on which Africa RISING is going to build its activities in future.At the end of the first day, participants were invited, in an Open Space, to identify areas that were important to draw lessons from and capitalize upon for the broader program to come. The following areas were identified: Day 2 -Grappling with researchThe second day of the workshop was dedicated to the research activities, building upon some pillars of the program: the research framework, monitoring and evaluation plans and the selection of action sites. Before this started, Ewen Le Borgne gave a presentation indicating the communication tools (see box 2) and channels created for the program. These tools and the teams present will support research work throughout the program.Participants asked questions about: how to deal with information (and communication channel) overload, document management, using the tools in low-bandwidth environments and using georeferenced pictures etc.These concerns will be addressed by the Communication team and where applicable the Project Coordination Committee in the next few months.Joseph The research framework presentation finally touched upon a series of methods that could be used such as participatory rural appraisal, participatory technology development and randomized control trials (RCT) -and particularly proposed some steps to roll out the RCTs across the sites.In the Q&A, Joseph emphasized:-The fact that we have limited budget but have to be clear that we are intervening in some villages and not in others (e.g. the control villages). -The complexity of RCTs and the fact that other factors from the environment are integrated too.-The idea of looking into tradeoffs between market use and household consumption, as a hypothesis around which to customize RCTs.Naomie Sakana (IFPRI) presented the monitoring and evaluation plan, with a specific track for monitoring (the \"process of systematic collection and analysis of data on specific\") which will be handled by implementing partners -IITA, ILRI and collaborators -and for the evaluation (the \"periodic assessment of worth or significance of an activity, policy or program\") which will be led by IFPRI. M&E entails a number of components, activities and outputs, summarized in the figure 3 below.The presentation is available here and is complemented by another presentation about possible evaluation activities which was referred to but not presented at this workshop.Mateete Bekunda presented the final building block of the morning session. In his presentation, Bekunda introduced the selection of districts in Tanzania (Babati, Kiteto, Kongwa), which was based on the development domains for sustainable intensification (agro-ecological potential, population density and market access) and the need for co-location at the Nafaka project sites in Kiteto and Kongwa (see figure 4 below). Site selection was based on the stratification work undertaken by Chris Legg on behalf of IFPRI.This presentation was complemented by another very short presentation by Regis Chikowo from Michigan State University about the selection of districts in Malawi. In the Q&A, the conversation touched upon the following:-Randomization of villages, which should be extended; -The attribution of impact to Africa RISING versus other projects in the area -something which USAID has specific guidelines about to avoid double accounting/reporting; -The importance of maize-based systems, even when looking at dominant sorghum/millet systems (they still include maize); -The importance of market access among variables chosen for site selection; -The challenges of receiving good data for some of these sites, when national systems lack that information and capacity to generate it in the first place. Before the next session, Lava Kumar from IITA gave a presentation about new challenges in intensification, related to the outbreak of a fungal disease (see box 4 for more information).The outputs of the work to fight this disease might lead to the development of a strategy to mitigate pest and disease risks to intensification and intensification plans.The district agricultural development officers of Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia presented one by one the major challenges they are facing in the districts selected for Africa RISING.The Malawi presentation emphasized soil fertility, climate (rainfall) variability, inadequate resources and suggested using lead farmers, drought tolerant interventions, soil fertility improving cropping systems and harmonization of programs and resources.The Tanzania presentation emphasized soil fertility, access to improved seeds, climate (rainfall) variability, pest management, weak linkages between research/extension/farmers, inadequate agroprocessing/mechanization, insufficient knowledge about nutrition; and for livestock, unavailability of improved breeds, overstocking, pests and diseases, conflicts between livestock keepers and farmers; generally weak market linkages and poor transformation.The Zambia presentation emphasized climate change, soil degradation, unavailability of improved varieties, dysfunctional markets (and awareness about them), pests and diseases, limited draft power, coordination among partners, lack of processing equipment. Ways forward suggested: productivity, nutrition focus, capacity building of NARS. In order to guide the discussions, Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon reminded all participants (in a presentation) about important boundaries and principles of research. Boundaries define what we are not going to do while principles inform our approach.-We work on the selected sites in the three countries -We focus on the Research Framework and its four Research Outputs -We follow the Feed the Future Indicators -We remain within budget and time frame-Our intervention domain is the farm household -Sustainable intensification: we aim at producing more output from the same area of land while reducing negative environmental impacts and increasing contributions to natural capital and environmental services -We follow a stepwise approach towards SI -We aim at targeting different household typologies which have different resources and livelihood objectives -We constitute R4D platforms for cooperation and co-learning, including private and public sector actors needed to deliver on SI at scale -The critical entry points we identified: (i) technologies for productivity enhancement, for natural resources management (NRM), for income generation, for knowledge management, (ii) innovations related to social and institutional arrangements , (iii) combination.Three additional ethical principles guide our work: We develop a relationship with farmers and handle data provided by farmers anonymously; we ensure data ownership (shared by partners) and we take care of publication rights (shared by partners with acknowledgement of those who originally collected data).On the basis of the prioritization of challenges and the research boundaries and principles, five multidisciplinary groups were formed to develop a series of research questions, activities and approaches.Each of these groups ensured that all the main issues identified in the prioritization were included. The results of all groups are available here.All groups addressed the exercise by looking at the individual components rather than their integration, despite the multi-functional composition of the working groups. This resulted in a long 'shopping list' of research questions, ideas and approaches which cannot be easily summarized here. See the group work results for more information.The day ended with some reflections about defining the unique comparative advantage or niche of Africa RISING, i.e. the fact that it is about demand-driven integrated systems research for sustainable intensification.To reframe the debates, the third day started off with three presentations about a) the research framework b) the Africa RISING niche and c) the Nafaka project and how to align Africa RISING with it.The presentation by Bernard van Lauwe (IITA) about the research framework explained further what Joseph Rusike had presented the day before, with particular emphasis on specific aspects of each research output:1. Situation analysis and program-wide synthesis focuses strongly on characterizing and stratifying target communities so that promising interventions are identified. 2. Integrated systems improvement requires identifying existing sound practices within communities and will strive for the combination of innovations from multiple sources. 3. Scaling and delivery of integrated innovation states that even well identified and integrated innovations may need additional efforts to be scaled up and out. 4. Monitoring and evaluation hopes to firmly wrap the three previous research outputs in an integrated M&E framework and approach.He also briefly introduced the research framework of the Humid Tropics CGIAR research program (CRP), as it is very close to that of Africa RISING -as shown in figure 5 below. The same components of analysis, integration and scaling support the work. Asamoah Larbi (IITA) followed this presentation with one slide introducing the niche of Africa RISING, i.e. the areas where crop-, livestock-and soil-focused technologies or approaches coalesce (area 7 in figure 6). Where the combination of the three cannot be achieved, at least two of these interactions should be together (areas 4, 5 and 6 in the figure).After both presentations, the Q&A session emphasized a couple of important aspects:-In this region, due to the urgency of planting, research output (RO) 1 and RO 2 activities have to be implemented concurrently; we cannot wait for RO1 to be completed before starting RO2.-The graph above does not include markets, nutrition, gender etc. but these are all elements that support the overlapping circles and should indeed feature in the research work plans.Joseph Rusike and Joe Tindwa concluded the early morning session with a presentation about the Nafaka project. Tanzania Staples Value Chain (NAFAKA) is a $30 million USAID-funded program that integrates agricultural, gender and nutritional development approaches to improve smallholder farmers' productivity and profitability in maize and rice value chains. USAID has been asking both projects to explore cooperation options.Joseph Rusike explored various options for cooperation through e.g. joint mother and baby trials, postharvest work, joint work on markets, RCTs etc. Joe Tindwa reinforced the message that there was ample room for cooperation between the two projects.After these presentations, participants split themselves across five groups: one group to work specifically on research output 1 and four groups to work on interactions: two groups on crop-soil interactions, one group on crop-livestock and soil interactions and one final group working on rice-based integrated systems. All groups worked on the same assignment and template, namely to identify:1. What combination of technologies would potentially fit in this system (bearing constraints in mind)? 2. What tangible research activities should we undertake to test if our combination fits this system? What specifically to do NOW? (to be in the field in November) 3. Who should be part of the research team? 4. Who could we partner with? The groups worked for most of the day and came up with presentations. Notes from the presentations are available here. The presentations themselves are linked from the sections below.Bernard van Lauwe, Joseph Rusike, Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon, and Naomie Sakana were tasked to identify approaches, methods, and tools that could be used to effect research activities under Research Output 1 (RO1). RO1 entailed 8 activities around situation analysis and program-wide synthesis. Different approaches, methods, and tools were identified and summarized in table 2 below.The group revised key drivers for testing intensification that were initially used to stratify mega-sites into development domains. Key drivers included agro-ecological potential, market access, and population density. Van Lauwe proposed to replace broad development domains with production systems. The argument was that key production systems reflect agro-ecological potential (i.e. suitability for specific crop commodities and specific crop livestock systems) and both human population density and livestock density.Market access could be considered in terms of distance to terminal market. Major terminal markets for the research areas are: (i) Kibaigwa in Kongwa district for maize (ii) Dar-es-Salaam for legumes and (iii) Dodoma for cattle. Based on agro-ecological potential, human population and livestock densities, the group identified four major production systems: (a) maize-based (b) maize-confined livestock grazing (c) Maize-free grazing and (d) mostly livestock. Market access can be captured in terms of both distance to market and production orientation at household level during baseline survey.GIS and meta-analysis methods will be applied to secondary data from Living Standard Measurement Surveys (LSMS) to define SI dimensions along key production systems.Specific sites/villages will be chosen in each of key production systems for the implementation of SI interventions. Research sites should be selected to meet the criteria of treatment and control sites for rigorous evaluation whenever possible. Potential villages have already been selected for treatment. Control sites, however, are still to be validated by the implementation team in Tanzania.GIS techniques are used to propose action research sites. The selection can only be completed by field visits to validate the results of GIS analysis.Upon completion of site selection, households will be identified to affect the activities on SI intervention implementation in the field. Given the diversity in household assets and their farming systems, a farm household typology will be developed to simplify this diversity. Data will be collected using participatory approaches, focus group discussions, and baseline surveys. Secondary data will also be gathered from LSMS 2010/2012. A participatory approach will be used to cluster households into different wealth classes. Multivariate analysis such as Principal Components and Clustering analysis will be used to refine the standard classification scheme to functional farm household typologies. The group stressed the need to match farm households with four production systems.In order to identify interventions that could be implemented in the field, it is imperative to identify researchable issues to be addressed by SI interventions. Such issues can be organized around key entry points. Once entry points have been identified, these can be linked up to create pathways for research implementation. Different methods that include Delphi, expert opinions / estimates, households and experts surveys, scoring, congruence, econometric modelling (i.e. producer and consumer surplus), DALYS (specifically for valuing other outcomes on environment, nutrition, gender, and equity), and Sustainable Livelihoods guidance Sheets will be used to identify pathways entry points. Rusike suggested initiating collaboration with Dr. Alioune Diagne from Africa Rice Centre to learn from his expertise on the use of DELPHI methods.The implementation partners need to agree and document the suite of interventions that will be implemented and evaluated at each research site. The inventory informs the appropriate design for the baseline survey. The survey is needed to obtain baseline values of indicators the intervention might change. Different data sources will be used to gather information on potential innovations, including: (a) projects (b) CRP portfolios and (c) outcome of the Review and Planning meeting. Innovations will be categorized into four major groups: (i) on the shelves (ii) in pipelines (iii) in use by farmers and (iv) indigenous knowledge. These innovations will finally be characterized to suit farm household typologies that would be identified in each farming systems of specific development domains.Ex-ante evaluation analysis will be undertaken to guide the identification of potential technologies. Analysis results will allow comparisons between predicted technology preferences with actual technology uptake among different household types. Farming system models and decision support tools will be used to determine physical input/output relationships of the potential options. Sensitivity analyses will be performed to test alternative technologies and their implications for system productivity (production domains, farms, communities) and system resilience. Results of ex-ante analyses will be validated by stakeholders from R4D platforms.This activity entails the identification of options that will be used to better integrate interventions into typology-specific bundles. Simple approaches for integrating SI option will be developed to suit interventions with specific systems and household types. System comparisons in-situ and participatory experimentation processes will be conducted with households of different typologies. Methods will be complemented with comparisons of perspectives between male/female farmers on technologies within household types.The group did not elaborate on this last activity. Formal M&E process, results of hypothesis testing at program level were proposed to affect this activity. Methods such as outcome mapping will be used to measure the behavior change.These activities were discussed in a larger group to define roles and responsibilities, timeframe for delivery, and identify funding source for their implementation. Details on roles and responsibilities, timeframe, and funding sources are presented in the table for each activity. In its presentation, this group looked at three different agro-ecologies: humid, sub-humid and semi-arid and listed crops that can be found there. They suggest the following:-Varieties to choose: adapted varieties, grain legumes with high HI, climbing beans (high altitude). -Temporal and spatial crop arrangements: crop rotations, intercropping, doubled-up legumes, inputs from farmer groups, introducing systems from other regions. -Soil fertility and nutrient management: Diagnostic nutrient trials, targeted combination of nutrients for the cropping system and soil types. -Foliar application of micronutrients.-Responding to farm typologies and domains.-NRM: soil and water conservation, land rehabilitation.-IPM -Labour-saving technologies: mechanization for intensification, post-harvest technologies)The combination they recommend: Appropriate varieties + cultural practices + soil fertility management + IPM + labour saving technologies +post-harvest and safety oriented technologies.The group also recommended a number of research activities and identified research team members and potential partners around these activities:In its presentation, this second group working on crop-soil/water suggested a number of technology combinations:-Cropping system: Intercropping and rotation, (depending on agro-ecological zones with health advantages of legumes), spatial arrangements -CA/water harvesting with intercropping/rotation with grain and legumes -Erosion/Water management (subs-oiling, tillage, tied ridges, live hedges, etc.) -Soil health: Fertilization with inorganics/organics (manure, compost, green manures, residue retention) -Integration of tree shrubs on farm: Faidherbia, pigeon peas -Grain legumes into the system -Cover crops/weeds -New varieties for food grains and legumes -IPM -Systems modeling for climate change and predictionThe activities they suggested include participatory variety selection, assessing pests/diseases, assessing adaptability and performance of new varieties, local legume production of foundation seed, water management activities, combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers, mother/baby trials, conservation agriculture (intercropping and demo plots), soil characterization in the research sites and system modeling as well as a number of cross-cutting activities (capacity building, economic evaluation of grain storage options, farmer linkages with market information, ex-ante impact assessment on income and nutrition, assessing the resilience of technologies to climate variability).The group also looked at the expertise required to carry out this work, in total 14 different disciplines enumerated in slide 6 of this presentation.Finally the group identified partners in each of the countries including Nafaka, NARS, local authorities, local policy centers, private sector actors etc.In its presentation, the group emphasized the following combinations of technology:-Dual purpose legume crops and tree/shrubs for ruminant and non-ruminant animals -Village Level Poultry and Crop Production for Meat and Eggs -On-farm feed formulation using locally available crops and trees/shrubs -Pasture management for extensive systems In its presentation, the rice systems group focused on the major constraints they are facing in rice production and in vegetable production (e.g. weed/pest management, water, markets, harvest and post harvest, input access and soil fertility), upon which they prioritized five technologies addressing the gaps:-Community-based seed and seedling systems: improved cv's, good seeds, healthy seedlings, promotion of good planting methods. -Integrated crop management: timing of operations, cropping rotations, labor-saving technologies, small mechanization. -Water management: WUE-enhancing technologies (drip irrigation, aerobic rice systems, water harvesting/conservation). -Harvest and post-harvest handling: small mechanization, improved packaging, grading and standardization. -Markets: warehouse receipt systems, farmer organizations to improve market access, farmer access to dedicated markets, food quality and safety standards.From this they identified activities that could/should be undertaken, in the short-and long-term:After these presentations, Mateete Bekunda took a few minutes to thank everyone for the inputs and to explain what the inputs were. There are lots of ideas on the floor and not everything can be implemented due to resource restrictions. Who is doing what in details remains to be seen, however the ideas formulated will help generate terms of reference to develop the actual work plans.Some of the activities proposed will be undertaken this year -with the urgency of the planting season -while others will be undertaken the subsequent years.In order to give the project team a feel of the diversity of contexts in the Tanzania project sites, and to illustrate some of the challenges facing small-holder famers, a one-day field trip was organized to two villages in Babati district in Manyara region.This is a very dry part of the district. The main economic activity for community in the village is livestock keeping, mostly cattle and goats. Their main challenge is getting adequate water and pasture for the livestock.At the time of the field visit, the pastoralists' communities were digging shallow wells to get underground water for their livestock. The water was very muddy and the exercise was very tedious.The villagers explained that for the last ten years, they had not received any substantial rainfall. They also said some of the community members had travelled with their livestock in search of pasture and water.The second stop was at Gichameda village to see an irrigation scheme that was started in 2004 with funds from the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) that was currently not being well managed and therefore not utilizing the resources well.The irrigation scheme was managed by the Mkombozi Water Users Association formed by the farmers. It had 167 members and covered 178 hectares. The farmers were growing rice, maize and vegetables. The members explained that the irrigation had increased their yield of rice production from 3.5 t/ha to 7t/ha.The farmers said their challenges included lack of modern farming implements such as weeders, rice harvesters and post-harvest processing machines, lack of market information and poor infrastructure. Pests and diseases were also spotted in some of the fields.-Progress in year 1 -Main lessons in year 1 (building on partnerships, entry points, logistics, opportunities) -Research framework and the three main research outputs -The importance of working with partners e.g. Nafaka, other Feed the Future projects.-Challenges in the action districts identified -prioritized -The niche of Africa RISING -Possible combinations of technologies and activities around various interactions -Who could be part of research teams for each set of interactions and who could be interesting partners for this work-This region works on RO 1 and RO 2 simultaneously to get ready for the planting season. RO 3 will be addressed later -All research teams are led by CGIAR scientists but include NARS, Universities etc.-The research teams focus on RO 1 (one team) and on various sets of interactions (cropsoil, crop-livestock, rice-based systems), following the niche of Africa RISING -Action sites selected are good and remain the same Lessons learned from the workshop Africa RISING is a complex program, begging the need to learn from ongoing activities. Here are some reflections about the content and process of the workshop:-The trans-disciplinary approach to group work was appreciated and helpful to develop research ideas -The niche of Africa RISING and its boundaries and principles have to be very clear to all people involved in developing action plans -it is important to spend time on this -Having representatives from other regions helps cross-pollinate and build upon lessons learnt from a region to the next -The stakeholder consultation day should be organized once clear action plans are ready to be presented, preferably a few weeks after the planning meeting (a useful lesson for year two) -Planning in details for such a complex project/program would be easier with a smaller group or with a group of people that have followed progress and conversations throughout the project -Africa RISING needs instruments to show progress made, decisions made and boundaries set so that not every aspect is re-explored/discussed/challenged after decisions have been made -Working on an integrated picture from the start is the way forward to elaborate activities, rather than identifying research questions, technologies etc. (otherwise everyone starts in their default operating mode) -Looking at planned activities for the next few years, rather than just year 2 would help prioritize key activities for each year and develop the sequencing -Systems thinking and integration of crop/livestock/soil interactions together with crosscutting elements (markets, institutions, capacity building, gender) is not straightforward and few people can readily elaborate working plans in such a fashion, it's a learning process for all of us"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1195378819.json b/main/part_2/1195378819.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8187933186423a38d82a501e3bee12710728d878 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1195378819.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"38fadbfc-174b-4f6d-b4ae-6843f74e7b0d","content":"\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1203605517.json b/main/part_2/1203605517.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..698664260bd902d412bfa29140a501931a072236 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1203605517.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c7982919f95acf1774b6f9d479df3da8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a1b69210-689e-48b8-919d-af39dfd67bc3/retrieve","id":"-1157926752"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"eb2c6e7d-b585-49be-b64c-69bc434a3075","content":"Through action research and development partnerships, Africa RISING is creating opportunities for smallholder farm households to move out of hunger and poverty through sustainably intensified farming systems that improve food, nutrition and income security, particularly for women and children and conserve or enhance the natural resource base. The three regional projects are led by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (in West Africa and East and Southern Africa) and the International Livestock Research Institute (in the Ethiopian Highlands). The International Food Policy Research Institute leads the program's monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment.Africa RISING appreciates support from the American people delivered through the USAID Feed the Future initiative. We also thank farmers and local partners at all sites for their contributions to the program.We acknowledge the funding from the USAID in Washington to the Africa RISING project in the Ethiopian Highlands, the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank to the Accelerating the Impact of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA) and funders for the Mixed Farming Systems Initiative.The main target of this module are woreda level crop production and protection experts and young researchers who are expected to train development actors in implementing PVS on farmer fields and farmer training centres; quality seed production and scaling of food crops innovations cereal-legume mixed cropping system in Ethiopia. The module can also serve as a source of reference to supplement other modules available to train development agents, young researchers and other actors.The module has three sessions and each session has self assessment questions, learning objectives, overview, contents. Users of this module are advised to read assessment questions to gauge their current understanding of food crops innovations and their scaling to bring impacts at farm and landscape levels.After reading this module readers will be able to: Describe approaches to conduct on farm PVSs and identify farmer preferred varieties.List the current high yielding varieties of food crops available for validation, demonstration and scaling.Describe procedures of quality seed production through community seed production scheme.This module provides practical guidance to woreda crop production and protection experts and young researchers on how to validate and promote farmer selected innovations; and carry out community seed production and scaling of cereals and food legumes. Since the content is largely based on experiences from AR project implemented in Tigray (South Tigray), Amhara (North Shoa), Oromia (Bale) and SNNP (Hadiya), the approach and the concept can be used on similar or other agro-ecologies.The module covers innovations that can be adopted for validation, demonstration and scaling of cereals, food legumes and similar annual field and vegetable crops in rainfed production system. The innovations include quality seed production of better performing varieties of the selected crops through community or village based seed system; use of complementary agronomic, pest and disease management practices, promotion and capacity building through training and field days.The module is structured in three separate but interlinked sessions; each with specific session learning objectives, preassessment, session overviews and session contents. The module also includes references for additional readings.Community based seed production Scaling of food crop innovationsAfter reading this session, readers will be able to: a. Describe key PVS protocols that will be followed in selecting better performing food crop varieties.b. List key agronomic and consumer preference traits used for ranking varieties. In most cases, the national research systems variety development is based on limited on farm testing. To fill this gap, PVS is considered as one of the approaches used to select farmer preferred crop varieties with specific as well as wide adaptation PVS is linked to community seed production that creates opportunities of easy access of quality seeds. In this session, protocols followed in implementing PVS trials are described supported with examples from Africa Rising project.Defining PVS.Protocol for PVS of cereals.Protocol for PVS for food legume crops.PVS evaluation processes for cereals and food legumes.Ranking methods in PVSs.Food quality and consumer preference.PVS is a variety selection process that is carried out on farm with the participation of farmers.The recommendation is that the varieties to be tested under PVS to be recently released by the research system.Participatory varietal selection assumes that varieties exist that are better than those currently grown, but which farmers have not had the opportunity to test or adopt. The highlands of Ethiopia have varied ecologies and difficulties to address the innovation needs of farmers because of the limited number of research stations. Hence, PVS is very important to identify high yielding varieties adapted to a given agro-ecologies. The rational for PVS are:1. Existence of heterogeneous environments that require specific solution.2. Breeders may miss some important traits that are preferred by farmers.3. Extension officers and seed companies are keen to know farmers preferred traits of crop varieties to multiply seeds and market for scaling.4. Rapid and cost effective approach in identifying farmer preferred varieties.5. Male and female farmers are involved in evaluating PVS trials that can increase the chances of adoption. and 6. PVS is linked to community seed production and farmers can have quality seeds that derive scaling of crop innovations.1. List and prioritize key production and quality constraints smallholder farmers are facing.2. Make sure to have access of seeds of recently released crop varieties from research centres and other sources.3. Assemble materials (string, measuring tape, pegs, measuring scale) for PVS planting.4. Proper site selection with good soil fertility, no waterlogging, uniform slope, no shade and soil erosion.5. In a sloppy land, the alignment of plots should be across the slope.6. Sites should be accessible with moderate efforts.7. Farmer training centres and/or host farmers (3-4 representative sites) are recommended to implement PVS trials.8. PVS can be done in collaboration with research centres.1. Plot size: We recommend a plot size of 25 m2 (5 m × 5 m) per variety.2. Plant wheat and barley varieties with 20 cm between rows and drill the seeds.3. Make a clear demarcation between plots of different varieties (0.5 m) apart.4. We recommend minimum of 4 recently released varieties and one poplar variety in the area. 5. Seeding rate: 125 kg/ha for wheat, malt (100 kg/ha) and food barley (125 kg/ha).6. Planting date: Follow the recommended planting dates based on rainfall onset in your locality.7. Method of planting: Row planting is recommended.8. Fertilizer application should be based on recommendation for the locality. 9. Weed management as recommended (minimum two hand weeding and/or herbicides) for the locality. 10. Pest management: Pesticide spraying is not recommended for diseases and insect pests that can be controlled through host plant resistance. If the crop has no known resistance to a given disease or insect pest (e.g. Aphids), it is advisable to control the pest using pesticides.11. Fortnightly monitoring of trials.12. Collect data on key agronomic and related traits. 15. Summarize farmer evaluation and yield data and rank varieties and select the top 1-2 varieties for demonstration and community seed production.1. Proper site selection with good soil fertility, no waterlogging, uniform slope, not sprayed with herbicide in the previous season and no shade and erosion.2. In a sloppy land, the alignment of plots should be across the slope.3. Sites should be accessible with moderate efforts. 4. Make a clear demarcation between plots of different varieties (0.5 m) apart.5. We recommend a minimum of 4 recently released varieties and one popular variety in the area. 1. Organize farmers evaluations at crop maturity stages.2. Select young and old, male and female, as well as knowledgeable and experienced farmers and community leaders.3. Form separate male and female groups for evaluations.4. We recommend 5-7 farmers in each group.5. Each variety should be given a code not a name.6. Selection criteria are set by farmers involvement.7. The expert only facilitates the evaluation process and records score values using the recommended format.8. Organize field days after farmer evaluations.In this module we introduce two ranking methods. The first ranking is a 1-5 rating scale where 1 = Very poor, 2 = Poor, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good and 5 = Excellent. The 1-5 rating was used in AR project to rank varieties of cereals and food legumes as well as other crops.Since participating farmers do not give equal importance to all the traits, a weighted ranking is used for final selection. A variety with the highest total weighted score value of farmer evaluation together with yield data are recommended for demonstration and community seed production. The above selection process and ranking were used to select farmer preferred varieties for community seed production and scaling of cereals and food legumes in AR project (Tables 1 and 2). Photo 1. Evaluating food barley and bread wheat PVS by male and female farmers.Photo credit: ICARDA.Photo 2. Evaluating faba bean PVS by male and female farmers.Photo credit: ICARDA.The second ranking of crop varieties is the use of Preference index (PI). At physiological maturity of the crops, male and female farmers are invited. The ranking is done by placing cards of different colours given to each farmer. The number of each colour equal to the number of varieties in the PVS. For example, if there are three varieties in the PVS, we can have three colours (green, yellow and red). If a farmer prefers a variety, he/she puts a green card inside an envelope prepared for this purpose. If the farmer hesitates about the variety, yellow card is used so that the variety will be reevaluated in the following season. If a red card is given, the variety is rejected. After the evaluation is completed, the number (N) of green, yellow and red cards are counted per variety and PI is calculated for male, female or both using the following formula:The PI ranged from 0 to 100%, with 0% meaning complete rejection and 100% meaning approval by all participants. If the two extreme values are not recorded, varieties with highest per cent PI values will be selected for next phase of evaluation. In addition, interviews with individual farmers (female and male) can be taken to know the reasons of selection or rejection.During variety selection it is advisable to include sensory evaluation by panels. The 9 point hedonic scale is the widely used method for scaling consumer preference and food acceptability. The values and their correspondent descriptions are: 9, like extremely; 8, like very much; 7, like moderately; 6, like slightly; 5, neither like nor dislike; 4, dislike slightly; 3, dislike moderately; 2, dislike very much; and 1, dislike extremely. It is recommended that crop varieties with a scaling of 9 and 8 can be advanced for production. If you missed one question from the above list, then this module is for you. We encourage you to read further to get the answers.Quality seed is one of the critical inputs in boosting crop productivity and production of cereals and food legumes. Access to sufficient quantity and quality seed at the appropriate time, place and price is a challenge through the formal seed system. In this module, concept of seed system and procedures of quality seed production through community seed production is explained. Community based seed production are many forms of semi-informal system other than organized regular public or private sector seed production where seeds of different crops are produced, marketed, exchanged and used by farmers for their different needs.Note: Four classes of seeds (breeder, prebasic, basic and certified) are recognized in Ethiopia seed system. Variety maintenance, production and distribution of breeder, prebasic and basic seed are carried out by the public breeding institutions or private seed sector whereas the certified seed is produced by public seed enterprises and private sector (companies, cooperatives, communities).National seed system, composed of formal, semi-informal, or informal sectors, should be context specific based on agro-ecology, farming systems, crops and farmers socio-economic characteristics and political constructs. There is no one seed system that fits all. Community seed production builds on farmers traditional knowledge and experience in seed production and seed trade or exchange at local level. It focuses on local demand for varieties and seeds; and serves as variety demonstration, seed production and promotion/marketing tool creating the awareness and building the confidence of the farmers.In Ethiopia, we find a mix of federal and regional public seed enterprises, small to medium domestic private seed companies and large-scale foreign private seed companies and a wide range of semi-informal licensed or nonlicensed small seed enterprises of different shapes and scales operated by cooperatives or farmer associations which are involved in seed supply. Evolution: develop into small, privately owned small-to medium-scale seed enterprises.ICARDA's seed section established the framework and critical steps for establishing and operating business oriented village based seed enterprises (VBSEs) and demonstrated their performance in terms of their technical feasibility and economic profitability which ensures long-term sustainability and their eventual transformation to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) as they grow, diversify and expand their operations.In Ethiopia, seed producer cooperatives (SPCs) emerged as the major and most effective seed delivery partners where they need to be promoted and supported for gradual evolution into the SMEs. Introducing quality declared seed (QDS) provided greater space for meaningful contribution of SPCs to seed delivery particularly of legume crops.Similar to the formal system, any kind of successful seed business requires skilful management of physical, financial and human resources. Therefore, it requires the following to be conducted before hand: 1. Seed system analysis: The seed system analysis should be conducted before establishing VBSEs, to assess whether there is a seed demand or 'seed gap' through a multistage and multistakeholder consultation.Convene a multi-institutional and multistakeholder consultation meeting to identify who might have an interest in and would support VBSEs; build the consensus and determine their roles and responsibilities in supporting operations and implementations. Selecting farmers: Participating farmers must be interested in setting up seed production and marketing enterprises as alternatives to grain production; and must be selected based on the following criteria: reputation in the community, experience in farming and seed production, relatively bigger/better land holdings, possession of equipment, entrepreneurial skills and financial resources:1. Forming seed producer groups: Farmer participation and empowerment are key elements of the VBSE program. Farmers should take responsibility and leadership and elect their own leaders whereas partners facilitate, provide guidance and advice.The land selected must be suitable for quality seed production, better/fertile soils, reliable rainfall (or irrigation), low incidence of diseases, pests and parasitic weeds, proximity and accessibility to main roads/facilities.The business plan assesses all factors and serves as a guide to strategic planning which may affect the enterprise-business potential, strengths, weaknesses, risks, products (crops, varieties), potential markets, demand, costs, sales and potential profits. It also includes risk assessments and sets out details of ownership, management and legal structure, staff, equipment and the budget. The absence of infection/infestation with seedborne pests (fungi, bacteria, viruses, nematodes, insects, weeds).1. Site and field selection to find suitable area or land for seed production. 6. Production arrangements using specialized growers. and 7. Maintaining seed quality by applying rigorous quality assurance systems.Seed production follows a generation system. In Ethiopia we follow the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) seed scheme which recognizes four seed classes (breeder, prebasic, basic and certified seed but also adopted the 'quality declared seed'). The later would provide an opportunity for farmer based seed production where conventional comprehensive seed certification would be replaced with more responsibility given to seed producers.Apart from agro-ecological and climatic adaptation, the area selected for seed production should be free from natural hazards like floods, drought, frost, salinity and diseases and insect pests, etc. to prevent any damage to the seed crops.Warm areas are preferable because warm weather favours flowering, pollination, seed setting and ripening. The area should be fertile, well drained and levelled. Areas with dry and cool weather conditions during ripening and harvesting are ideal for maintaining seed quality.Availability of irrigation facilities are key factors for selecting fields for seed production.Accessibility and proximity of the land for supervision and suitability for transporting the seed quickly and economically is also essential.Seed production is carried out by community members or under contract with specialized seed growers who are knowledgeable and experienced and have necessary facilities. They usually incur additional costs because of the extra care and attention required to produce quality seed (isolation, roguing); and therefore, should receive premium over the grain price to cover the extra costs for managing seed production.Selecting fields with the right cropping history and suitable crop rotation is necessary; and if possible, these two should be combined. The right previous cropping is necessary to avoid genetic, mechanical and pathological contamination in seed production, whereas crop rotation is mainly practiced maintaining soil fertility and control soil and/or seedborne diseases. A seed crop should preferably follow another crop species to avoid admixtures (e.g. cereals after legumes or vice versa). The land selected for seed production should be free from varieties of the same crop species for at least one or two years prior to planting unless the previous crop is of the same variety. A field used for seed production should also be free of noxious weeds and seed/soilborne diseases. This will help control volunteer plants (which may reduce varietal purity) and prevent buildup of seedborne diseases and noxious weeds including parasitic weeds such as striga and Orobanche depending on crop species.The practice of growing of a seed crop separately from all sources of contamination, is one of the fundamental seed production techniques. An appropriate isolation (in space and/or time) should be maintained to prevent contamination (admixture and/or cross pollination) based on the pollination habit of the crops, field size and presence of natural or physical barriers. Selfpollinated crops need small distances while crops with high percentage of outcrossing require long isolation distances (Table 3). 1. Off types of genetic variants of the same variety.2. The varieties of the same crop species.3. Other crops with similar growth habit and seed characteristics.4. Noxious weeds difficult to remove during cleaning. and 5. Plants infected with seedborne diseases.Roguing can be performed at various stages of crop growth, but the most effective stages are flowering, post flowering or maturity, when it is easier to see important morphological characteristics (inflorescence type, flower colour, ear shape) that will help differentiate between the variety and the rogues. During roguing, the whole plant with all lateral tillers should be removed, taken out of the field and burned. The roguing crew must be well trained to examine the seed crop carefully and remove contaminants.All farm machineries for seed production from planting (tractors, cultivators etc.) to harvesting (threshes, combiners) to transporting (trailers) as well as seed cleaning and treatment equipment should be cleaned between different operations to avoid varietal admixtures.The variety must be selected based on the results of PVS from a list of recommended varieties. Apart from its adaptation, the variety should have high yield potential, tolerance to biotic (fungal, bacteria, viral) and/or abiotic (cold, frost, heat, drought, salinity) stresses and have good marketability and consumer preferences to ensure wider adoption and demand for seed.Selecting source seed: Good quality seed from a known source, where the field is inspected and the seed is cleaned and tested. Basic seed purchased from the agricultural research centre or certified seed from the formal sector, is recommended, since it assures good quality seed with high varietal purity, physical purity and germination.Crop and pest management practices: Good agronomic practices should be applied to produce high quality seeds.The time of sowing depends on the variety and area of adaptation. A seed crop must be planted at its recommended time, otherwise growth and development may be affected, thus reducing seed yield. Matching varietal maturity to the sowing date is a key element for maximizing seed yields in dryland farming and it helps in reducing risks. Seed rates may also differ among varieties depending on seed size and the method and time of sowing. The recommended seed rate should be used when a crop is sown at normal time to achieve the right plant population for adequate competition with weeds and for better yield.Irrigation: Availability of irrigation water is important for a good seed crop. The irrigation regime should be scheduled according to the crop growth stages. The seed crop must receive ample water at two critical stages of crop growth, i.e. during establishment/vegetative growth and early phase of seed development. Moisture stress at these two stages will adversely affect the yield and quality of the seed. Less water during flowering promotes seed setting while ample water after flowering will ensure the development of the greatest possible number of seeds, thus increasing seed yield. On the other hand, irrigation at physiological maturity will delay harvest maturity. In Ethiopia irrigation in the dry season can be used to fast track early generation seed production. Harvesting: Whether the seed is harvested and threshed manually or mechanically, the most critical factors to be considered are the seed moisture content, mechanical damage and cleanliness (of equipment). The following instructions must be followed when harvesting high quality seed:1. Start harvesting when the seed moisture content is reduced to approximately 12%(cereals and legumes) to avoid mechanical damage and maximize storability.2. Set the concave clearance and speed of the threshing drum to reduce mechanical damage as much as possible. Mechanical damage influences physiological quality such as germination and vigour.3. Adjust the air and screening system to minimize losses and maximize physical purity.4. Harvest crops/varieties in a sequence that minimizes mechanical mixing between them.Cleaning includes the removal of inert matter; seed of weeds, other crops, other varieties and seeds of the same variety which are shrivelled, damaged, deteriorated or diseased, to improve and upgrade seed quality.Seed treatment: Seed infection may lead to low germination, reduced field establishment, severe yield loss, or a total crop failure. It is important to:1. Use seed treatment chemicals with a strong dyeing colour to discourage human consumption or use for animal feed.2. Use simple seed treatment machines, which can be properly cleaned between varieties.3. Adjust the rate and coating systems properly to ensure good pesticides application.4. Treat seeds in a sequence that minimizes mechanical mixing of varieties and crop.Seed packaging: Proper packaging is important for safe handling, storage, marketing and distribution. Using proper packaging material contributes to minimizing quantitative and qualitative losses.Cleaned and treated seed should be stored until it is marketed and distributed. Maintaining the quality of the seed during storage is important using proper storage management. The principle of cool, clean and dry (CCD) for storage facility and the first in first out (FIFO) of seed stock should be applied for storage management. Monitoring the storage temperature and moisture content of the seed as well as monitoring pest infestation and control need to follow.Managing seed storage: Adequate planning and management are essential to avoid losses and keep seed free from insect pests during storage. The following preventive and remedial measures should be taken to:1. Ensure that all seed storage structures are clean, cool and dry.2. Locate seed storage sites in cool and dry (low relative humidity) areas.3. Clean and spray all storage structures thoroughly with insecticides, followed by a regular spray of residual insecticide.4. Maintain proper sanitation in and around seed stores to deny insects any shelter for multiplication and to control rodents.5. Clean the seed and reduce its moisture content to a level that will allow safe storage for the required period.6. Use new bags to avoid both insect infestation and mechanical mixtures. Seed should be bagged in a thick weave cloth bag without loose weaves.7. Keep seed bags on wooden pallets at least 50 cm away from walls, with aisle space of 1 m, to ensure adequate aeration.8. Inspect seeds upon entry. They must be free from storage pests. Check stored seed at least once a week, for insects and if found, fumigate immediately. 9. Apply sound rodent monitoring and control program during seed storage.10. Store seed of high germination and vigour only.11. Immediately dispose of poor quality seed.12. Maintain seed identity by labelling each bag, keeping up to date records and using stack cards.Fumigation: Fumigants are insecticides used to control storage pests. In seed production, phostoxin (aluminium or magnesium phosphine) is widely used. It is popular because it is easy to handle, has no influence on germination and the seed can be fumigated repeatedly.Phostoxin is applied at the rate of 3-6 tablets per tonne of seed (2-4 tablets per m3). For larger stacks, under suboptimal conditions (i.e. low moisture contents), or when eggs or pupae must be killed, the exposure time should be extended. The relative humidity of the air should not be lower than 30% because no gas will be released from the tablets. At 30% RH, exposure time should at least be 10 days. In very dry areas, insufficient moisture may be present and it may be necessary to place a container of water under the fumigation sheet. To sum up, the factors determining the success of fumigation are:1. Hygienic conditions, 2. Proper dosage and exposure time, 3. Adequate sealing and 4. Correct temperature and sufficient moisture.Since farmers have difficulty assessing the physical or genetic qualities of seeds before they are planted and grown, certification of seed quality is essential to provide users with quality assurance and a means of redress if expectations are not met. A quality assurance system ensures that certified seed meets prescribed national quality standards. In Ethiopia, regional regulatory agencies provide seed quality assurance and certification. This includes documentation regarding seed sources, inspections of seed production fields during the growing season and laboratory tests of seed after cleaning. The main features are:Field and seed standards are maintained.Evaluating seed production.Enforcing quality standards during marketing.Field inspection: Regional regulatory agencies conduct field inspections through visiting seed production fields to ensure that it meets the field standards:Fields meet standards for cropping history, isolation distance and varietal purity;Evaluation for seed production fields for off types and other varieties, other crops, noxious weeds and seedborne infected plants.Laboratory seed testing: Regional seed regulatory agencies can take seed samples from cleaned seed and conduct laboratory testing for seed standards such as physical purity, germination, moisture content and seed health.Simple tests that are applicable for seed moisture tests are as follows:Bite test: Pinch seeds between the finger and bite. If the harvested seed is hard or cracks, then it can be stored. If the seed is soft then it needs more drying.Salt test: Fill a quarter of a clean dry jar with salt, add seeds to reach half of the jar close to the lid and seal tightly. Shake the jar well and leave for 10 minutes and if damp salt adheres to the inside of the jar, it indicates the seed needs further drying. If no salt adheres on the jar, the seed is adequately dried for storage.For physical purity tests you may follow the following procedures:Draw a working sample from a submitted sample according to the species.Weigh the working sample and separate the seed sample into three fractions: pure seed, other crop seed and inert matter.Weigh each fraction separately and calculate the percentage weight of each fraction.The percentage of pure seed fraction is the physical purity of the seed sample.The germination test you may follow the following procedures:1. Count 400 seed from submitted sample and divide them into 4 replicates of 100 seeds (eight replicates of 50 seeds).2. Moisten a paper towel so that it is damp but no dripping water when you shake.3. Place the seeds on paper towel in a line and in the middle not touching each other.4. Fold the paper over the seeds, roll the paper towel up loosely and place it in open plastic bag vertically.5. Put the rolls at room temperature or in a controlled room with 20-30°C and ensure that the paper towels do not dry out.6. In each replicate count the number of normal seedlings (with normal roots and shoots), abnormal seedlings, fresh ungerminated seed and dead seeds at the final count. Basic seed is generally multiplied to produce Certified seed 1 which can be further multiplied to Certified seed 2 (Certified seed 3 in some cases) which are used for commercial crop production.After reading this session readers will be able to:List the types of scaling methods used for promoting crop innovations.Describe how PVS is linked to scaling through community based seed production.Explain the potential of digital extension services in crop innovations scaling. What is scaling?Preparatory work for scaling.Mechanization.Scaling crop innovation includes upscaling, out scaling and downscaling. Out scaling refers to the spreading of cereal and food legume innovations in the target production system whereas upscaling refers to creating favourable enabling conditions to scale the innovation at higher levels. If the newly validated innovations become part of the national extension packages, we call the scaling as upscaling.Most of the released cereal and food legume varieties in Ethiopia are not in the hands of farmers for many reasons. Among the key factors are farmers are not aware of the varieties; limited adaptation of varieties and poor access to quality seeds.Scaling of crop is done to promote crop innovations. As a result, it will help to create awareness and enhance adoption and ultimately increase productivity.Scaling of crop innovation involves three major activities:Training of farmers, village based development agents and seed growers.Ensuring availability of quality declared seeds of farmer preferred crop varieties.Good land preparations.Applying recommended agronomic practices: applying the recommended fertilizer rates (inorganic and organic); applying recommended seed rate based on seed size; pest and weed management as well as mechanization if available.Using digital extension as part of group and mass extension. In general, four types of digital extension tools could be applicable for agricultural extension and advisory services: Photo credit: ICARDA."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1204694957.json b/main/part_2/1204694957.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e92b08c6b660ce3eb675e72f838e435cca4a763 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1204694957.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"76e4cc39fc5519f9b4f099ef81821ced","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4d4f19bb-979f-446b-9934-8db18aa3692d/retrieve","id":"520316330"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0fd4565f-86a3-44ba-bdf3-55fb4e3caa4e","content":"The Sustainable Intensification of Mixed Farming Systems Initiative aims to provide equitable, transformative pathways for improved livelihoods of actors in mixed farming systems through sustainable intensification within target agroecologies and socio-economic settings.Through action research and development partnerships, the Initiative will improve smallholder farmers' resilience to weather-induced shocks, provide a more stable income and significant benefits in welfare, and enhance social justice and inclusion for 13 million people by 2030.Activities will be implemented in six focus countries globally representing diverse mixed farming systems as follows: Ghana (cereal-root crop mixed), Ethiopia (highland mixed), Malawi: (maize mixed), Bangladesh (rice mixed), Nepal (highland mixed), and Lao People's Democratic Republic (upland intensive mixed/ highland extensive mixed).The Sustainable Intensification of Mixed Farming Systems (SI-MFS) Initiative aims to provide equitable, gender-transformative pathways for improving the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in selected MFS, namely: Cereal-root crop mixed (Ghana), Highland mixed (Ethiopia), Maize mixed (Malawi), Rice mixed (Bangladesh), Highland mixed (Nepal), Upland intensive mixed and Highland extensive mixed (Lao). Through action research, this will be done by bundling innovations (e.g., good agronomic practices, improved varieties, and training) at different scales of analysis and implementation in close collaboration with a wide range of MFS actors. It aims to achieve this goal by establishing and nurturing strong collaborative partnerships across the entire research-development continuum for SI of MFS, including the CGIAR and other international research institutions, national research institutions, private business entities, relevant government ministries (departments), and nongovernmental organizations.SI-MFS is a holistic initiative that will work on diverse socio-technical and institutional innovations. Therefore, our sample selection will not target specific technology or technology package. There are two main learning questions where we want to implement Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs): (1) Which are the most scalable SI innovations that improve sustainability, resilience, and equity in the selected MFS? Which features of social and technical innovations (including those that are gendertransformative and socially inclusive) are projected to achieve the highest uptake and improvement of resilience, equity, and efficiency if bundled; (2) What potential market governance and institutional innovations can ensure the scalability of relevant, gender transformative SI strategies in MFS?To answer these questions, we will implement the following procedure to select the sample districts, villages, and households. In the first step, the districts will be selected purposively, from which MFS villages will be randomly assigned to intervention and control categories. Depending on the country context, villages will be stratified based on agroecological settings (e.g., length of growing season, production mix and pattern) and market access. The randomization will be done to capture villages in all strata in each sample. Villages in intervention areas will receive support from the initiative that increases farmers' access to improved (packages) of technologies and techniques, which are expected to improve sustainability, resilience, and equity among beneficiaries. Villages in the selected MFIs will be randomly assigned to four groups. One of the villages (say group I) will receive support targeting sociotechnological innovation only. These interventions are expected to impact livelihoods within the existing village-level institutional settings. Socio-technical innovations include improved crop varieties or animal breeds, improved crop management techniques and inputs, improved soil and water management techniques, and a combination of these which will be co-designed by partners with the participation of farmers. The second group of villages (group II) will receive support targeting institutional innovation only. These interventions are expected to impact livelihoods within the existing socio-technical settings of the villages. Institutional innovation includes new rules and organizational arrangements which will improve farmers' access to markets and information and enhance social equity. The third group of villages (group III) will receive support targeting socio-technical and institutional innovations. The fourth group (say group IV) will not receive support from the initiative; this is the control group. The RCTs will mostly be done at the village level only, and its application at the household level will depend on the nature of the innovation and its rollout process. For instance, treatment randomization will not be done at the household level if technologies already being rolled out (from earlier projects) follow explicit rules on household level observables. However, RCTs will be done at household level for selected studies targeting specific innovations to be identified in the course of time. Such studies will be nested in the bigger study targeting the entire intervention of the Initiative."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1212971505.json b/main/part_2/1212971505.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..91d0ffb2656a7295d749867af891120491a17c5d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1212971505.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c81bb1a8bbfe704fb2bdd73ab368e988","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/768986a2-62dc-4297-9723-6f1e38e5ef8b/retrieve","id":"-1769030198"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"08dc76d1-dfd2-445b-a9c3-657d85f6f6aa","content":"Emphasis this year was on a study of disease presence, changes in severity and performance of cassava clones in each of five different environments. The identification of wide-type resistance to existing biotic problems as weU as its durability in these ecosystems is being investigated. The relationship between plant reaction to cassava bacteria! blight (CBB) in the greenhouse and field, and its stability through several continuous cycles was investigated. Field studies were begun to examine differences in the severity of CBB, superelongation and anthracnose in monoclonal and multiclonal plots at high and low inoculam levels. The sexual stage of the superelongation causal agent was found and its implication on pathogen-host interactions is being investigated.Diplodia root-stem rot was identified at CIAT-Palmira. This disease, CBB, the frog skin and other viral diseases constitute the most threatening diseases of cassava in the production and distribution of vegetative planting material. Etiological studies were undertaken on the characterization of the frog skin disease causal agent.Screeninc for durable resistance. Plant reactions to cassava bacterial blight (CBB) infection under controlled conditions (by the clip inoculation technique, CIA T Ann. Rept. 1975) and in the first cycle offield testing were very similar. The pathogen was found invading the stem 5 cm above ground in cassava genotypes rated susceptible, intermediate-resistant and resistant, but the rate of pathogen recovery from susceptible genotypes was greater than from both the latter ones. Although bacterial invasion throughout tbe vascular system was positively correlated witb the susceptible types as evaluated by extemal symptoms (r=0.914 for greenbouse reaction and 0.927 for field reaction, both significant at tbe 0. 1% level), several exceptions were observed.•Since the pathogen has poor pectinase activity, mature stem tissue may appear symptomless. Bacteria survivingin invaded xylem vessels of mature stems used as planting material spread systemically through young plants, whicb then serve as sources of inoculum in the next cycle. Consequently, tbe proportion of infected cuttings increases after several cycles of continuous cultivation of apparently intermediate-resistant or resistant genotypes when ratings are assigned after only one cycle of greenhouse or field evaluation. Using such \"resistant\" material continuously could result in a progressive decline in stand density dueto lack of gennination, decreased plant vigor dueto bacteria! root rotting, and earlier onset of more severe epidemics. This was corroborated witb results obtained after planting severa! genotypes at Carimagua for four cycles using planting material from that site (Fig. 1). Dueto poor soil fertility in this region, production ofplanting material decreased about 60% compared with CIA T -Palmira.However, resistant genotypes (group 1, Fig. 1) in which bacterial infection in the stem was very low or absent produced a constant numberof cuttingsduringa four-cycle period, while other resistant or intermediate genotypes only survived for two or three cycles (groups li and 111, Fig. 1). Susceptible genotypes were eliminated during the first or second cycles.The data indicate the great importance of tbe sanitary condition of planting material on genotype stability, the existence of durable CBB-resistant genotypes in Manihot esculenta, and the need to evaluate testing material in the field for several continuous cycles in CB~ndemic areas, to identify accurately durable CBB-resistant genotypes. Planting material for each successive cycle must be produced in an endemic test area. Final resistance evaluation should result from integrating data on plant reaction, cutting production and quality of propagating material. Epidemiology. Considerable yearly fluctuations in CBB attack bave been found in Carimagua and Media Luna. This suggests that continuous evaluations over a period of years may be necessary so as to identify sufficiently good levels of durable resistance.Causal agent. The sexual stage of the causal agent, Sphoceloma manihotícola. has been discovered and found to be abundant at a number of sites. Based on morphological studies of the fungus collected in Carimagua, CIA T -Quilichao, Media Luna and Mexico, it has been tentatively identified as a species of Elsínoe, a loculoascomycete. With one exception, all the known sexual stages of species of Sphaceloma are Elsínoe. A preliminary literature survey indicates that tbis may be an 20 undescribed species. Growth stages of the fungus are shown in Figure 2.Single ascospore isolations produced colonies typical of S. manihotícola and similar to those described for other members of the genus, Susceptible cultivars inoculated with these colonies showed characteristic superelongation symptoms and reisolation yielded S. maníhotícola. That this sexual stage is so common suggests that the pathogen may be pathogenically variable. Preliminary field observations and previous laboratory experiments support the existence of physiological races (see below and CIAT Ann. Rept. 1977), and a thorough investigation is being undertaken.Epidemiolou. A multiclonal experiment was begun in Carimagua to test the influence of mixing resistant varieties on disease epidemic development and yield (root and stake production). Eight varieties were planted nonrandomly so that no two plants of the same variety were adjacent. Both next to the multiclonal plots and 2 km away each variety was planted in pure plots for comparison. Since the data are preliminary and incomplete only a few of the most interesting results will be presented.Figure 3 shows that the varieties in the multiclonal plot had somewhat more superelongation disease than the same varieties had in pure plots. From field observations during the disease season, CMC 40 plants appeared to actas foci for sub-epidemics in the multiclonal plots. Thus interspacing a susceptible variety with more resistant varieties seemed to increase the totallevel of disease for all varieties rather than appreciably protecting the susceptible variety. This is contra. ry to what was expected based on epidemiological researcb with cereals. Investigations to clarify these results are being planned for the coming year. .... 1t is interesting to compare tbe disease levels in CMC 40 and otber varieties within the multiclonal site, between that si te and the si te 2 km distant where there was considerably more superelongation disease. At tbe multiclonal site, a1J varieties, which are considered resistant or intermediateresistant based on data from recent years, showed more disease than they did in the remote site. This was extreme for CMC 40 (Fig. 3). Considering the level of disease in susceptible varieties planted adjacent to CMC 40 and the other resistant varieties, the low disease levels in these plots could not be dueto escape. This difference in susceptibility within a clone under more or less uniform environmental conditions is consistent with the existence of physiological races within the pathogen. Causal agent. Severe outbreaks of diplodia root and stem rot were observed in Colombia's Cauca Valley. This disease has been reported as one of the most serious ones in Brazilian cassava plantations, and in Africa, India and Cuba. lts causal agent was isolated and identified as Diplodia manihotis Sacc., which could be synonymous with Botryodiplodia manihotícola Petr. Confumation' of this synonymy awaits further taxonomic study. The fungus produces clusters of picnidia on stromatal structures 22 located just beneath epidermal tissues of necrosed roots and stems. lmmature picniospores are hyaline, but mature ones are dark, two-celled with thick walls. They are released through the picnidium, opening mostly during rainy periods. Penetration, fungal establishment and iñvasion are being investigated.Epidemiology. There are two disease phases. The first is a root rot initiated by infection from infested soil or by using diseased cuttings taken from diseased plants. In this case, the fungus, which is a facultative parasite, could infest the soil and remain indefinitely as a saprophyte. lnfected plants show root deterioration, sudden wilt and death. Symptoms are similar to those induced by other root-rot pathogens.The second phase, a stem rot, is generally induced by systemic invasion from roóts or picniospore infection of the stem. The fungus invades most of the stem tissues producing gumosis, sudden wilting, dieback and phloem and xylem rotting. Picnidia are produced readily on the stem epidermis of infected stems. During this phase, roots and mature stems may remain symptomless. Systemically infected stems may exhibit no externa! symptoms and appear to be suitable planting material. Syrnptoms can be confused with those caused by anthracnose, Phoma arid superelongation dieback, CBB, drought stress, salinity, insects and spider mites. However, the fungus can be readily identified by the features of picnidia and picniospores produced.The fungus is disseminated over long distances by infected cuttings taken as planting material. Within a plantation, wind and • rain-splash dissemination of picniospores is probably most important, while land preparation machinery and irrigation water may also sometimes be importan t.This disease has been found in Colombia associated with a subterranean sucking insect (Cydnidae) which causes the initial injury ( other agents like nematodes can cause similar injuries and might initiate the same symptom development). This Cydnidae is described in the Entomology section of this report.The insect introduces its stylet through the root epidermis and cortex injuring the root tissues and inoculating them with soilbome microorganisms (mostly fungi). Severa! fungal species ha ve been isolated from these lesions. Artificial inoculations simulating the insect damage have induced similar symptoms (Fig. 4). These microorganisms degrade the infected root tissues causing initiallocalized rots which can invade the entire rootalong the vascular system. Y oung lesions are paJe to dark brown spots which sbow tissue degradations. Symptoms are most stríking and lesions are most frequent in swollen roots and during harvest periods. A zone which fluoresces light blue under UV light occurs adjacent to the lesions, suggesting that the mechanism of discoloration could be related to that occurring in post-harvest physiologicaJ deterioration. In 1980, characterization of the frog skin disease causal agent continued with emphasis on detection, transmission and isolation studies.A cytological study revealed considerable degeneration of the pbloem of young roots showing frog skin symptoms as well as the presence of massive inclusions blocking the phloem parenchyma in these tissues. Similar inclusions were occasionally detected in the phloem of petioles and midribs of diseased plants. No sucb inclusions were detected in the pbloem tissues of healthy plants. Based on these observations, mycoplasma-like organisms or a phloem-restricted virus have been suggested as probable causal agents.The possibility of a phloem-restricted virus such as those in the closterovirus class is currently being investigated.Preliminary results have shown the presence of long filamentous particles, similar to those of closteroviruses, in partially purified preparations from roots of frog skinaffected cassava plants. Whetherthese particles are indeed virions or artifacts is still unknown. The possibility of a mycoplasma-like organism as the causal agent of frog skin disease will be reinvestigated despite negative results in earlier tests.Preliminary field results suggest tbat the disease is efficíently transmitted (up to 62%) by natural root grafts whenever stakes are planted closer than 1 m. Natural root injury or the existence of soil vectors, however, have oot been discarded as possible transmissioo mechanisms.N o transmission via sexual seed was observed in 9month-old plants grown from seed produced by 46 different cassava clones affected with the frog skin disease. So far, an alternative host has not been found among 50 other plant species following conventional mechanical inoculation experiments.Fertilization with 200-200-100 kgf ba ofN-P-K increased symptom expression, especially in cultivar M Col 22.Screenin& for durable resistance to biotic problems. Germplasm evaluation in the past has shown that durable resistance to biotic problems of eacb environment exists although frequency is relatively low. Evaluations by Pathology and Entomology sections consist of growing accessions in each environmeot utilizing planting material produced in the same environment. Only those varíeties which survive the season and produce adequate healthy planting material are carried over to the next year.In Popayan, stable varieties could be identified afterthe fourth cycle, and in Carimagua, after the tbird. Up to the third cycle, the stability of the varieties has not been confirmed in Media Luna(Table 1 ). It is important to stress that resistance identified in these evaluations appears to include durable resistan ce to all biotic problems existing in the evaluation site and may also integrate resistance to abiotic problems. Cassava environment relationships. Environment studies begun in 1978 (CIAT Cassava Prog. 1979 Ano. Rept.) continued during the 1979-80 season, when plants from the first cycle were harvested. Cultivars which produced planting material were continued in a second cycle. AH diseases and pests identified during 1979 in each of the five target environment were present in 1980, with the exception of the ash disease which was first detected this year in Caribia and Media Luna(Table 2). However, anthracnose (caused by dÜferent Co/letotrichum spp. in each environment) was more severe in Caribia and Carimagua than tbe other environment tbis year; brown leaf spot was also very severe in Caribia and Media Luna, as was white leaf spot in Caribia.The lace bug ( Vatiga spp.), which was unimportant during the rainy season of 1979, caused severe damage during the same season this year at Carirnagua.Thrips were important at CIAT-Palmira, gall midges in Carimagua and scale insects in Popayan.The populations and severity of spider mites (Mononychel/us and Oligonychus species) have increased considerabfy in the CIAT-Palmiraenvironment.In general fluctuations in population dynamics and severities of disease and pest damage were observed for each environment between 1979 and 1980.Differences within and between tbe five environments were considerable for the characteristics shown in Table 3. Yield range at CIAT-Palmira was similar to that at Caribia but means in these environment were notably larger than in tbe otber three environments. Stake number and starch production also resemble yield in those respects.Differences in ranges and means for harvest index and ltCN content were similar in all environments. A wide range of deterioration susceptibilities was found only in CIAT-Palmira and Popayan; in the otber environments most cultivars were markedly resistant.In general, yield and especially the harvest index were well-<:orrelated between all environments excluding Popayán, although CIA T -Palmira correlated with Carimagua only for harvest index. HCN content correlations were generally low and susceptibility to physiological deterioration and stake number sbowed no relationsbips between environments, apart from between Carimagua and Media Luna.Popayan was obvio)lsly dÜferent from the other environments. The cultivars which did best in Popayan, namely local regional varieties, produced poorly in all other environments and especially so on tbe Colombian Nortb Coast (Caribia). The local cultivars from the Nortb Coast fared equally poorly in Popayan.On tbe basis of tbese relationsbips, CIAT-Palmira and Caribia have sorne similaritíes, as does Media Luna, with both Caribia and Carimagua, but the differences between the environments are still substantial, e.g., yield, starch content, stake number, general evaluation and root deterioration susceptibility in CIA T -Palmira sbowed no significant correlation with Carimagua. This demonstrates the importance of carrying out varietal selection at the environment level at the earliest possible stage of any breeding program. This is particular! y true for Popayan and Carimagua.Selection must continue until stability of yield and other selected traits has been achieved using planting material produced on-site. Nevertheless, the higb correlation between many characters in Media Luna and Carimagua suggests that similar material may be useful across these environments. The two main areas of investigation this year ha ve been the study of the variation encountered in the field witbin and among cultivars regarding tbeir susceptibility to deterioration and the analysis of the biochemical processes which lead to the production of the blue-black pigments. Considerable progress was made in both areas.Repeated evaluations of susceptibility to pbysiological deterioration showed that within one cultivar a wide range of susceptíbílíties can be encountered (CIA T Cassava Prog. 1979 Ann. Rept.). In tbe cultivar most studied, M Co122, maximum and minimumdeterioration values (Det. %, where 100% is total and 0% is no deterioration, after tbree days) were 98% and i 8%, respective1y at CIA T-Palmira, while even lower values were found at other sites (0% at Popayan and Carimagua). Values obtaiiied from sorne other cultivars showed similar pattems.The wide range of susceptibilities witbin one cultivar at one si te makes the description of cultivars as \"resistant\" or \"susceptible\" tD physío1ogical deterioration difficult and of dubious validity.Pruning studies. Pruning plants prior to harvest has been shown repeatedly to reduce susceptibility to physio1ogica1 deterioration (CIA T Cassava Prog. 1979 Ann. Rept.). Experiments on M Co122 plants have shown that this effect occurs regard1ess of the removal or supression of new regrowth from the pruned stump, although initiaUy the 1oss of susceptibility is greatest in those treatments with Jess regrowth. The effect of pruning, regard1ess of regrowth removal, was also found to 1ast considerably longer than previously reported. P1ants still showed no signs of losing the resistance nine weeks or more after pruning. However, there is a 1oss of root qua1ity (reduced starch content) associated with pruned roots which must be taken into account.Environment studies. Eva1uations of Det. % were done on 25 cultivars in the five sites of the environment experiment. Cultivar differen~es between tbe sites were large, and environment corre1ations were not significant. In Carimagua, Media Luna and Caribia, a majority of cultivars showed marked resistance, regardless of theír susceptibility in CIA T -Palmira or Popayan, the two si tes which did produce the expected range of Det.% scores. The correlation of Det. % with the starch content of the roots (CIAT Cassava Prog. 1979 Ann. Rept.) was significant Plant defoliation caused by insects, diseases or water stress in the months preceeding harvest could bave the same effect as pre-harvest pruning, 1eading to an induction of resistance to physiologica1 deterioration. In the three environments where 1ow Det. % values were found, substantial defoliation due to both biotic and climatic factors had occurred prior to harvest. Controlled experiments are in progress to see ü resistance in the field is related to the severity of water stress and other factors.Examination of roots under UV light 24-48 hrs after harvest revealed the presence of a brilliant blue fluorescence in the parenchymal ússue which was not visible in freshly harvested roots. These fluorescent areas were the first to develop the vessel pigmentation characteristic of physiological deterioration. Roots with deteriorated vessels showed this blue fluorescence in tbe advancin¡ front of deterioration. Similar observations at CIAT and Tropical Products lnstitute, TPI (J. E. Rickard) have been made during a rnicroscopical study of primary deterioration in cassava roots.Chromatographic studies by J. E. Rickard at TPI have shown the blue fluorescing compound to have retention times identical to scopoletin, a coumarin derivative. lndependent studies at CIAT have agreed with tbis identification.Exogenous applications of high concentrations (500 ug ml-1 ) of scopoletin to freshly harvested root tissue induce rapid and intense vessel and parenchymal discoloration, identical to that found in naturaUy deteriorating roots. A range of related phenolic compounds had no effect. Applications of scopoletin to tissue from pruned roots produced an identical reaction to that of unpruned root tissue suggesting that resistance in pruned roots is not due to an inability to respond to scopoletin.Roots attacked by various fungi (Aspergi/lus sp., Fusarium spp., etc) also had areas of blue fluorescence and vessel discoloration around tbe infected area, suggesting that scopoletin accumulation is a general response to stress in the root tissue.."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1234525469.json b/main/part_2/1234525469.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5dfef249f613060e51e2f3a0483af7fd95981de0 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1234525469.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9e812555be21f2f83e69568ef6167593","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8a51e9f6-ecf5-444a-92ed-89322b69f247/retrieve","id":"810080748"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"cf9cac19-2d77-4697-9f2f-9550a924bf92","content":"What is 'CGSpace' 'Multi-tenant' use of a Dspace application  Shared admin, look and feel, publishing, content management, hosting, training, support Shared hosting, development, and learning [and server] Allows searching across collections open access + open standards + open licenses = enhanced visibility of research outputs Publications, journal articles, books, training materials, project reports, factsheets and links to digital audios,• Repository of outputs of people and projects (hosted at ILRI)• Publishing and alerting platform• Repository for projects, institutions, programs …• Gateway to Google and beyond "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1235902929.json b/main/part_2/1235902929.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02aca4a44ad3e442730c43d124f46c32ab61875d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1235902929.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"51aff0f3e7e6591027a09c1d041d80c7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8d7effc8-0910-4064-bc17-f38101f7a9a4/retrieve","id":"-1918381438"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"22f3f34d-db52-488f-a4ee-c6e5b5f6d7c7","content":"Welcome to the second newsletter from the CGP Tanzania Project, whose purpose is to provide specialized information to the project stakeholders on the implementation of the project.We welcome short articles from the research component teams for forthcoming newsletter. These articles are expected to cover some of the on-going activities within the components. We would also appreciate to receive comments from readers in order to improve this newsletter.T his project (Integrating Dairy Goat and Root Crop Production for Increasing Food, Nutrition and Income Security of Smallholder Farmers in Tanzania) was developed with the aim of improving food security and livelihoods of smallholder farmers through introduction and testing of breeding and management practices for dairy goats and root crops. Thus, the objectives of the project are to improve the livelihoods, food and nutrition security and incomes of poor agro-pastoral communities through integrated root crops and dairy goat farming. S ince its inception in March 2011, the CGP Tanzania project has been holding different forums with the objective to provide a learning environment for the research teams in the project to share the project research experiences and findings within the components in the project. One of such opportunities, which is worth noting here was a \"Research Workshop\" which was held at ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute) campus in Nairobi, Kenya, from June 18-20, 2013. Being the main objective, this workshop provided an avenue for faculty and graduate students to share preliminary research results and enable them continue developing project-based insights across all aspects of the project. In total, 20 presentations were shared among the workshop participants, which also included presentations from five ( 5) key presenters and experts on community-based animal and rootcrop production who were invited to these meetings; their insights helped to enhance and complement the learning objectives of the workshop.Creating a space for research learning within and outside the project Our camera inside the \"research workshop\" venueVolume 2, E ach study in the research component of the CGP Tanzania project has been designed to answer specific research questions within the project research sites. The areas of research are on dairy goats and root crops particularly on cassava and sweet potato improved varieties. Other research activities have been on household nutritional status, gender relations, livelihoods, the assessment of market chains and the environmental impact assessment of the project.During the project \"Research workshop\" in July 2013, our camera inside the venue at ILRI in Nairobi, Kenya, brought into focus several findings from the research activities above where the participants of the workshop witnessed presentations from fourteen ( 14) researchers who among them were five (5) postgraduate students researching on different research topics covering various project objectives. The following section in the following page highlights some of these research activities/findings.Photo: A round table of researches from and outside the project listening to the CGP Tanzania project Team leader T he introduction of dairy goats in the country has provided an alternative source of milk to households that cannot afford keeping large dairy animals. Therefore, it is imperative to improve productivity of livestock in rural areas to increase the availability of animal protein leading to improved food security and wealth creation by boosting livestock production. However, dairy goat production is constrained by poor husbandry, poor nutrition & lack of breeding stock, diseases (infectious & non-infectious), poor extension services and poor marketing system. Therefore strategies to increase productivity require evidence-based interventions.To improve the milk production potential of indigenous goats through crossbreeding, improved management and control of major diseases. ▪ Gastrointestinal parasite infestation prevail in the study area which calls for intervention through appropriate strategies for the control of these parasites in goats. However, the burdens are relatively small to justify mass deworming. Treatment of clinically sick animals is recommended. ▪ There are various health problems in goat farms in the project sites.▪ Respiratory diseases are an important cause of goat mortality in the study farms. Vaccination against CCPP and Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) were used as a preventive measure.▪ Close monitoring of health of animals by resident Livestock Field Officers and farmers, and timely reporting is required to minimize mortalities.Nutritional status of under 5 years old children in the 4 project The four research sites under the CGP Tanzania project are located in the 2 two region where despite the introduction of dairy goats and root crop production initiative, little is known on aspects of child nutritional status and gender relations among project beneficiaries. This problem led to a cross-sectional research on the nutritional status of children aged 5 years and below, which was conducted by Pamela Meena (a postgraduate student from Sokoine University of Agricultures in Tanzania).The overall objective of this study was to analyze child nutritional status and gender relations among project beneficiaries. Specific study objectives:▪ to assess nutritional status of the below five years children in selected households; ▪ to assess household dietary patterns ▪ to determine the existing gender relations of project beneficiaries.Project research sites were in Kongwa (Masinyeti and Ihanda) and Mvomero (Kunke and Wami Luhindo) districts. A total of 107 households were purposively selected whereby 107 adult respondents and 74 children below five years of age were involved.▪ The findings from this study indicate that chronic malnutrition is more pronounced in Kongwa district specifically in Masinyeti village. Location child live, child age, education level of mother and inappropriate feeding practices were associated with child malnutrition status. Most of decision making and ownership of household resources were taken by men; women seldom make decisions alone.This study recommends further studies at the household level on the: First, association between child nutrition and gender relations, second, Nutrition education and gender training are important for the community and, third, Improvement of adult education especially for women is also important is reporting from her research findings chronic malnutrition more pronounced in the study area specifically in Masinyeti village in Kongwa district Most decisions making and ownership of resources were undertaken by men thus, hindering women to make decision that may influence nutritional status of the family including the children.F rom May to October 2012, 4 members of research team from SUA and the University of Alberta, Canada conducted an environmental assessment with communities in the four CGP Tanzania project villages in Kongwa and Mvomero district in Tanzania that have been implementing a dairy goat and root crops project. Community Based Environmental Assessment (CBEA) is an approach used to collate information in order to identify and analyze the environmental impacts of planned, on-going and completed community development activities.The study attempted to address three key research questions: what are key environmental challenges in the project villages? ▪ What are the likely environmental impacts from this project? ▪ What could be the community-perceived mitigation and enhancement measures for such impacts?▪ Participatory Research Appraisal methods such as focus group discussions, participatory village resource mapping, transect walks and pair wise ranking were used to generate information.The communities revealed several environmental challenges and depicted a number of environmental impacts (both negative and positive) including: ▪ shortage of pasture, deforestation, conflicts between farmers and pastoralists and loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the communities crafted the respective mitigation measures for the indentified project impacts.▪ In contrast to conventional regulatory environmental assessments that are required for larger scale industrial projects in many countries, this study offers experiences from a small scale development project where environmental impacts are assessed. Such methods could be applied to many other small scale development initiatives where positive or negative environmental impacts can be enhanced or ameliorated. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1239383486.json b/main/part_2/1239383486.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..74c614fe76d22a1c9ef601e074c7dd36ac1b570c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1239383486.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"e9f117eb-0c21-4b4a-9e0c-753a375af27a","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1257960653.json b/main/part_2/1257960653.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ee07c758668ad6a123472167a01e70c03e7d332 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1257960653.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ed5e78f28e15852594f9b0f13f3ac7f5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4a01b65b-3fce-476a-a71e-b9cff18de06d/retrieve","id":"352308151"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"09c42c2a-c683-445d-b983-e58f445bb26b","content":"• The better-off benefit at the expense of the poor -> aggravate inequality and food insecurity• Women do not benefit as (much as) men -> aggravate gender inequalityNegative impacts of innovation and scaling• Expansion of intensive, commercial agriculture -> degradation of land and nature• Non-users have livelihoods displaced.Innovating and Scaling for Social Transformation 1. What is the content and extent of the challenges for AR4D actors to effectively innovate and scale towards positive social transformation? 2. Do Agricultural Innovation System frameworks and AR4D tools give sufficient attention to social theory, and if not, how can traditional social theory methods address frequent oversights? 3. Given common emerging themes, can we establish standard principles that AR4D actors can universally adopt, irrespective of the AIS framework or AR4D tool they utilize?Key concepts Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS)• A network of actors -individuals or organizations -which together with supporting institutions and policies in the agricultural and related sectors, bring existing or new products, processes, and forms of organization into social and economic use (FAO).-Conventional aims -Learn through survey Supply through pipelineLearn through surveyAdoption studies Criteria: Frequent use or potential operationalization of these frameworks at multiple levels and scales of projects."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1283182839.json b/main/part_2/1283182839.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19385894605af632afb9d75db0f8f946572d1563 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1283182839.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"304600eac5dfe9009ae9c6c57490bbb0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/82cab164-f860-4cfb-a8c0-057f4a34c09d/content","id":"418742971"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5c40ad3c-f759-4ac3-8376-0a5f0debb343","content":"Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) is one of the serious global issues in wheat production. Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) and closely-linked markers is greatly helpful for wheat improvement. In the present study, a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from the cross of Zhongmai 578 (ZM578)/Jimai 22 (JM22) and parents were phenotyped in five environments and genotyped by the wheat 50 K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Two QTL of germination index (GI), QGI.caas-3A and QGI.caas-5A, were detected, explaining 4.33%-5.58% and 4.43%-8.02% of the phenotypic variances, respectively. The resistant effect of QGI.caas-3A was contributed by JM22, whereas that of QGI.caas.5A was from ZM578. The two QTL did not correspond to any previously identified genes or genetic loci for PHSrelated traits according to their locations in the Chinese Spring reference genome, indicating that they are likely to be new loci for PHS resistance. Four kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) markers K_AX-109605367and K_AX-179559687 flanking QGI.caas-3A, and K_AX-111258240 and K_AX-109402944 flanking QGI.caas-5A, were developed and validated in a natural population of 100 wheat cultivars. The distribution frequency of resistance alleles at Qphs.caas-3A and Qphs.caas-5A loci were 82.7% and 57.1%, respectively, in the natural population. These findings provide new QTL and tightly linked KASP markers for improvement of PHS resistance in wheat.Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important staple food crops and is cultivated globally, right after rice (Oryza sativa) and maize (Zea mays) [1]. It serves as a source of carbohydrate, protein, vitamins and mineral elements, accounting for about 20% of the total protein and 21% of the calories worldwide [2]. Preharvest sprouting (PHS) is a precarious issue affecting numerous wheat production areas, frequently occurring globally in many principal wheat-producing areas including China [3][4][5]. It was induced by summer rainfall and high humidity [6][7][8], and early seed dormancy (SD) breakage under wet or humid conditions before harvest [9], leading to significant losses in the grain yield and quality of end-use products [10]. The annual economic loss caused by PHS on wheat production has been estimated to be 1.2 billion US dollars worldwide [5]. Developing wheat varieties with PHS resistance is the most effective way to reduce the loss caused by PHS [11], and identifying genetic loci of PHS resistance is very helpful for breeding resistant varieties through marker-assisted selection (MAS).With the advent of high-throughput genotyping platforms, such as next generation sequencing (NGS) and chip-based genotyping technologies, many QTL for PHS-related traits have been identified on almost all 21 wheat chromosomes [5,9,10,[12][13][14][15][16][17], among which the region on chromosomes 3A, 3B, 3D, and 4A are considered to be most important for SD and PHS [5,7,[18][19][20]. Moreover, several candidate genes have been isolated by homolog-based cloning, such as TaSdr on chromosome 2B [21,22], TaVp-1 on chromosome 3B [23][24][25], TaQSd1 on chromosomes 5A, 5B and 5D [26,27], TaDOG1L4 on chromosome 3A [28][29][30], and TaABI5 on chromosome 3D [31]. Several genes for PHS resistance also were isolated by map-based cloning, including mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 (TaMKK3) [32], TaPHS1 [33,34], PM19A1-A2 [11,35] and Tamyb10 [36,37].Zhongmai 578 (ZM578) and Jimai 22 (JM22) are two elite white winter wheat cultivars in the Yellow and Huai River Valleys Winter Wheat region, the largest zone of wheat production in China. ZM578 is characterized with good PHS resistance, whereas JM22 has relatively poor resistance. Therefore, a recombinant inbred lines (RIL) population generated from a cross between ZM578 and JM22 was used in this study, with the aims to: 1) identify genetic loci for PHS resistance, and 2) develop breeder-friendly efficient markers for MAS in breeding on improvement of PHS resistance in white winter wheat.A mapping population with 262 RILs derived from a cross of white grain winter wheat ZM578 and JM22 by the single seed descent method was used in this study. ZM578 that was selected from the cross of Zhongmai 255 and JM22, is a high-yielding variety with good tolerance to PHS (Fig. S1). The field trial for the RILs and parents was conducted in five environments including Xinxiang (34°53 0 N, 113°23 0 E) in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in Henan province (defined as E1 and E2), Shangqiu (34°44 0 N, 115°65 0 E) in 2020-2021 (E3) in Henan province, Luoyang (34°32 0 N, 112°16 0 E) in 2020-2021 (E4) in Henan province, and Gaoyi (37°33 0 N, 114°26 0 E) in 2020-2021 (E5) in Hebei province. A randomized complete block design with three replications was used in all environments. Thirty seeds were sown in each row, with each plot comprising a 1.0 m row spaced 25.0 cm apart. A panel of 100 wheat varieties from Yellow and Huai Valley Winter Wheat region was used to validate the effectiveness of KASP markers, with the phenotypic data available in Zhang et al. [22].Pre-harvest sprouting resistance was evaluated based on the germination index (GI) value. Five spikes in each plot, were collected from each environment at physiological maturity by cutting the peduncle about 10 cm below the base of the spike, when a loss of green color occurred in the spikes [38,39]. Harvested spikes were air-dried for 5 d in a greenhouse at (25 ± 5) °C, hand threshed and the seeds were kept in a freezer at À20 °C to maintain dormancy until phenotyping [22,40]. All seeds were taken out from the freezer and air-dried again for an additional 2 d on greenhouse desks. One hundred healthy grains of each line were surfacesterilized with 5% NaClO for 15 min and washed three times with sterile water. The sterilized seeds were placed in a 90 mm Petri dish containing filter paper and 8 mL of distilled water, and incubated at 23 °C for 7 d. Germinated grains were counted daily and removed. The weighted germination index was calculated according to the following formula [41]:where n i is the number of grains germinated in the ith day; N is the total number of grains.The 262 RILs and parents were genotyped using wheat 50 K Infinium iSelect SNP arrays containing 55,224 SNPs outsourced from CapitalBio Corporation (https://www.capitalbio.com). The SNP data were processed by removing monomorphic markers, SNPs with more than 20% missing data or minor allele frequency (MAF) of < 0.3. The remaining high-quality polymorphic SNPs (9354) were further analyzed to remove redundant markers using the BIN function in IciMapping v4.2 [42] (https://www.isbreeding. net/). The resulting genotypic data consisting of 1501 nonredundant markers (bin markers) were used to generate a linkage map with JoinMap v4.0 software using the regression mapping algorithm. The linkage maps were drawn by the MapChart v2.32 software [43] (https://www.wur.nl/en/show/Mapchart.htm).The best linear unbiased estimation (BLUE) values of lines in each environment and across environments were calculated for subsequent analysis using the PROC MIXED function in SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC https://www.sas.com). Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were conducted using PROC MEANS and PROC CORR functions. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using PROC general linear model (GLM) function. Broad-sense heritability (H b 2) was estimated according to the following equation;e re where r 2 g , r 2 ge , and r 2 e are the variances of genotypes, genotype by environment interaction, and residual error, respectively, and r and e are the numbers of replications and environments, respectively [44]. Bar graph was used to perform multiple comparison for combining effect of stable QTL, and their distribution was indicated by GraphPad prism Version 8.0.1 (GrapPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).QTL analysis was performed by the Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) method with additive effect, using IciMapping v4.1 software [42]. The logarithm of odds (LOD) threshold for declaring significant QTL was 2.5 based on 1000 permutations with type 1 error (a = 0.05). The physical positions of mapped SNPs in the region of detected QTL were identified by blasting the SNP flanking sequences against reference genome sequences of the Chinese Spring (RefSeq 1.0, IWGSC, International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium, https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/blast_iwgsc/). The QTL was named following the International Rules of Genetic Nomenclature (https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/wgc/98/Intro. htm). QTL detected in two or more environments were regarded as stable.Sequences of SNPs flanking stable QTL for the pre-harvest sprouting resistance were converted to KASP markers. The KASP primers were designed using PolyMarker (https://www.polymarker.info/) following Li et al. [17]. The 384-well optically clear plates were read on PHERAstarplus SNP (BMG Labtech GmbH, Ortenberg, Germany) to detect the fluorescence, and data analysis was carried out using KlusterCaller (LGC, Hoddesdon, UK). KASP markers were validated using a panel of 100 wheat varieties.The additive effect of stable QTL was determined by categorizing the RIL or cultivars in the natural population into four different genotypic groups (1 R , 2 R , 1 S and 2 S ) based on the flanking markers of QGI.caas-3A and QGI.caas-5A. The two QTL were temporarily designated as loci 1 and 2 respectively, where R and S represent resistance and susceptibility alleles, respectively. The GI values of the The RILs and parents were evaluated for PHS using GI values across five environments. The mean GI value of ZM578 had a significantly lower value (3.7%) than that of JM22 (44.73%) at P < 0.001 and continuous distribution of GI in the RIL population was observed, indicating a typical polygenic inheritance (Fig. S2; Table S1). ANOVA revealed that GI was significantly influenced by the effects of genotype, environment, and genotype  environment interactions (P < 0.01) (Table 1), and broad-sense heritabilities ranged from 0.91 to 0.98 among the five environments, with a high mean value of 0.91 (Table S1). Also, among-environments, correlations of GI were significant and positive, with the values ranging from 0.52 to 0.76 (P < 0.001) (Table S2).A high-density genetic linkage map of the ZM578/JM22 population was constructed with 1501 bin markers on all chromosomes except 6B, spanning 2384.95 cM with an average distance of 1.59 cM per bin marker. The maximum number of markers was recorded in A genome (562), followed by B (545) and D (394) genomes (Tables S3, S4). In addition, SNPs were unevenly distributed among chromosomes, such as 7A (133) and 2B (132) having the highest number, while chromosome 6A had the lowest number of SNPs (11). No SNP was mapped on Chromosome 6B, suggesting that this chromosome might have a large similarity between the two parents. Six QTL for PHS resistance were detected on chromosomes 1D, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4A, and 5A, designated as QGI.caas-1D, QGI. caas-2B, QGI.caas-3A, QGI.caas-3B, QGI.caas-4A and QGI.caas-5A, respectively, explaining 29.84% of the total phenotypic variance, with LOD values ranging from 2.57 to 7.17. Among these, two were stably detected in at least two environments on chromosomes 3A (QGI.caas-3A) and 5A (QGI.caas-5A), respectively (Fig. 1; Table 2). QGI.caas-5A was detected in four environments and the BLUE value, explaining 4.43%-8.02% of the phenotypic variances, with the resistance allele contributed by ZM578. QGI.caas-3A was identified in two environments and the BLUE value, contributing for 4.33%-5.58% of the phenotypic variances, with the resistance allele derived from JM22.Four KASP markers, K-AX-109605367 and K-AX-179559687 for QGI.caas-3A and K-AX111258240 and K-AX-109402944 for QGI. caas-5A, were successfully developed, and their genetic effects were verified in a panel of the natural population with 100 cultivars (Fig. S3; Tables 3, S5, S6). Both of the genotypes with resistance alleles at both QGI.caas-3A and QGI.caas-5A have significantly lower GI values than those with both susceptible alleles in the natural population of 100 cultivars, with 82.7% of germplasm possessing the resistance allele of QGI.caas-3A and 57.1% having the resistance allele of QGI.caas-5A, respectively (Table 3).Using the flanking markers AX-111055367 and AX-179559687 of QGI.caas-3A, and AX-111258240 and AX-109402944 of QGI.caas-5A, 262 RILs were divided into four groups (1 R , 2 R , 1 S and 2 S ). The results indicated that the genotypic combination with both resistance alleles (1 R 2 R ) at QGI.caas-3A and QGI.caas-5A had a significantly lower GI value in all environments, as well as the BLUE value in comparison with the other three groups, whereas those with both susceptible alleles (1 S 2 S ) had a significantly higher GI value in all environments, as well as the BLUE value than the other three groups. (Fig. 2).Moreover, in the natural population of 100 cultivars, the genotypic combination with both resistance alleles (1 R 2 R ) at QGI.caas-3A and QGI.caas-5A showed a significantly lower GI value than the other three groups, whereas those with both susceptibility alleles (1 S 2 S ) had a significantly higher GI value than the other three groups (Table S7). Therefore, pyramiding the resistance alleles of QGI.caas-3A and QGI.caas-5A can effectively improve PHS resistance.PHS affects end-use quality and wheat production in many regions across the world; therefore, developing cultivars with good resistance is an effective way to minimize economic losses, and markers tightly linked to the identified resistance genes are helpful in accelerating the development of new cultivars. The current study detected two stable QTL, QGI.caas-3A and QGI.caas-5A, for PHS resistance. QGI.caas-3A was detected on chromosome 3A at 568.7-573.9 Mb based on the flanking markers AX-111055367 and AX-179559687. Liu et al. [45] and Liu and Bai [46] identified QPhs.pseru-3AS with flanking markers Xbarc12 and Xbarc321 located at 11.7-15.5 Mb. Shao et al. [5] detected two QTL at 11.7 Mb. Kulwal et al. [38] identified a major QTL for PHS linked with marker Xgwm155 at 703 Mb. Osa et al. [19], Nakamura et al. [33], and Mori et al. [47] reported a QTL QPhs.ocs-3A.1 for grain dormancy between markers Xbarc310 and Xbarc 321 spanning 7.1-11.7 Mb. Miao et al. [48] identified QPhs.caas-3AS.1 for PHS flanked by markers Xbarc294 and Xbarc57 at 7.9-10.3 Mb. Fofana et al. [49] reported a QTL for GI linked with marker Xcfa2 at 690.7 Mb. Himi et al. [36] found a QTL for PHS associated with a red grain color gene Tamyb10-A1 at 703.9 Mb, which is more than 100 Mb away from the QGI.caas-3A. Therefore, QGI.caas-3A appears to have a different position from these previously identified QTL on chromosome 3A (Table S8), indicating that it is probably a new genetic locus for PHS resistance. The reason for relatively low mapping resolution of QTL on chromosome 3A may lie in that the susceptible parent JM22 is one of the parents of ZM578. Therefore, the RILs of ZM578/JM22 used in this study have high genetic similarities, which make little polymorphisms in the genetic background, and the KASP markers developed in the study should be effective in testing the diversity panel. QGI.caas-5A was mapped at 17.1-17.2 Mb on chromosome 5A, flanked by SNP markers AX-111258240 and AX-109402944. Several previous studies have reported QTL associated with PHS and SD on the long arm of chromosome 5A [12,[50][51][52][53][54]. Borner et al. [12] identified a QTL for PHS linked with markers Xgwm186 and P7560-439, located at 471.7 Mb for the closest marker. Groos et al. [55] reported a QTL for PHS and grain color on the short arm of chromosome 5A flanked by markers Xbcd1871-Xgwm304, with the closest marker located at 105.5 Mb. Fakthongphan et al. [50] detected a QTL linked with marker Barc10 at 2.1 Mb using three RIL populations. Zhu et al. [51] reported a QTL linked with marker Xbarc 360 at 458.3 Mb using 260 wheat varieties and advanced lines. Martinez et al. [52] detected a QTL linked with marker IWB10250 at 540 Mb using a panel of white winter wheat cultivars and elite breeding lines. Zuo et al. [53] identified a QTL for PHS resistance linked with marker BS00036907_51 at 438.1 Mb, explaining up to 4.2% of the phenotypic variance. Lin et al. [54] reported two QTL linked with marker Bobwhite_4004_61 at 33.2 Mb and Excal-ibur_c54774_408 at 593.0 Mb, using 260 wheat varieties and advanced lines. Nakamura et al. [56] identified an ABA signaling gene TmERA3 on the centromere region of chromosome 5A at 343 Mb by in silico analysis. The position of QGI.caas-5A is located differently from all the reported QTL (Table S8), based on the wheat reference genome (IWGSC RefSeq 1.0), indicating that it is likely to be a new QTL for PHS resistance.It should be indicated that only two of the six QTL mapped in this study were found to be stable, and the phenotypic variance explained was not high, which may be attributed to the following two reasons: 1) PHS is a complex quantitative trait and controlled by numerous minor genes, and it is highly influenced by environments; 2) JM22 is one of the parents of ZM578, and theoretically near 75% of the genetic background of the RILs is originated from JM22, thus it is not possible to identify common PHS resistance genes in this RIL population. Therefore, it worth conducting further research using a population of ZM578 with some other cultivars rather than JM22, to find more PHS-related genes in ZM578. Moreover, we believe, from breeding point of view, many genes detected previously act as minor genes in the background of modern leading wheat cultivars like JM22 and ZM578, which have combined with many favorable alleles of genes underling good agronomic parameters. It is much worthy doing QTL mapping or fine mapping in modern wheat cultivars, and the favorable alleles of QTL mapped can easily be used in wheat breeding program.The two stable QTL QGI.caas-3A and QGI.caas-5A identified in this study showed an additive effect on PHS resistance when combined, suggesting the genetic complex systems in regulating wheat PHS and the importance of pyramiding a specific combination of QTL. Zhongmai 578 contributed the resistance allele of QGI.caas-5A, and the resistance for PHS of QGI.caas-3A was contributed by Jimai 22. Therefore, tracing the pedigree for the favorable alleles will provide important information for future MAS and the developed KASP marker K-AX-111258240 (Table S6) tightly linked with QGI.caas-5A was successfully used to trace the origination. The result indicated that the favorable allele of QGI.caas-5A was inherited from Zhengzhou 761 through Yumai 49 to Zhongmai 255 (Fig. S4; Table S9), providing the marker for MAS on PHS when using Zhongmai 578 as a core parent in the future, as well as other cultivars in the pedigree such as Yumai 49 and Zhongmai 255 with excellent pan bread quality. It should be indicated that some favorable alleles in Zhongmai 578 inherited from Jimai 22 could not be detected in this RIL population because Jimai 22 is one of the parents of Zhongmai 578."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1284420286.json b/main/part_2/1284420286.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0170449a5ee163f732ea3b22ed5f616b684b7711 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1284420286.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"25339e162cf39e2befe5ebefaf8bad55","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/38d44215-095e-49c7-9aa6-07f16b3e8102/retrieve","id":"-332735302"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e5acea0b-d5f7-40cc-b69f-8f2e5160f09e","content":"A middle path to seed systems development holds promise for farmers and consumers by promoting sensible regulations and improved information sharingThe absence of an effective regulatory system to govern seed systems for vegetatively-propagated crops (VPCs) Policy options for advancing seed systems include formal recognition of farmer-saved seed as seed class use of truthful labeling and seed traceability technologies to improve information flows; investment in early-generation seed production; and promotion of domestic seed production by foreign and domestic enterprises.IN VIETNAM, quality assurance of VPC planting material is largely informal: trust and reputation between buyers and sellers is a major pillar in exchanges of planting materials, thus limiting the market to very localized scales.In many Asian countries, seed systems for VPCs are governed by a regulatory blueprint for cereals. This approach tends to disregard the distinct biological characteristics of VPCs, thus limiting farmers' access to high-quality planting material and increasing the risk of pest and disease transmission. Clonal propagation offers several advantages, including low-cost and often rapid production of planting materials of identical genotypes. However, the quality of clonallypropagated planting material tends to degenerate across time with a build-up of pests and diseases on or in the material itself. Also, in the case of potato, seed potato is essentially the same plant part as ware potato. As such, seed potato is a credence good 1 , as seed quality cannot be assessed upon visual inspections.We focus on two VPCs: cassava and potato, the former of which is primarily used for industrial purposes, and the latter as primarily a cash crop, cultivated for the fresh and processing markets. The research drew together scientists from the International Potato Center (CIP), the Alliance of Biodiversity and CIAT, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), and Michigan State University.The study was conducted in Vietnam in 2017, amassing data from different actors of the seed system value chain for VPCs through interviews. Through more effective policies aimed at seed systems for VPCs, access to high-quality planting material can be increased and risk of pest and disease transmission reduced.To promote more access to high-quality planting material for farmers in Vietnam, this study aimed to fill three objectives:• To analyze quality-assurance mechanisms adopted by key actors of the VPC value chain, and the suitability of existing policies and regulations governing the VPC sector, with a focus on the diversity of seed providers and farmer typologies in the cassava and potato sectors;• To discuss the tradeoffs and unintended consequences associated with the current policy framework in Vietnam; and• To explore the viability of alternative frameworks to improve farmers' access to quality VPC planting material.We argue that Vietnam's seed policy framework -the laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines that govern both the genetic improvement of crops and the production and exchange of planting material -are weakly adapted to the unique requirements of VPCs. This absence of effective policy and regulation may limit farmers' access to planting material of superior genetic and physical quality, thereby increasing the risk of pest and disease transmission and reducing expected gains in productivity of VPCs. However, we also recognize that a formal quality-assurance system that relies on certified seed production, inspection, and distribution may not be entirely appropriate or feasible in this context, at least not in the short run.The study mainly draws on primary data collection: a series of key informant interviews (KIIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted with seed system actors. The KIIs and FGDs were conducted in 2017 using semi-structured interview guides that were developed for each category of actorsas part of a larger crosscountry project on seed systems and markets for VPCs.The interview guides covered topics that ranged from quality-assurance standards and practices to viewpoints on the effectiveness of current policies and regulations. A total of 18 KIIs and FGDs were conducted in 2017 with 39 individuals from across 18 different types of stakeholders (e.g., farmers, consumers, traders) in the cassava and potato seed sector.The data collected through KIIs and FGDs yielded data that support two findings:1. Actors employed various quality assurance mechanisms to obtain clean seed, ranging from visual inspection of seed, seed surveillance and containment, to supporting the domestic production of quality-declared seed.2. In the absence of certification, trust and reputation between seller/producer and buyers are critical to assure quality of planting material.There also appear to be two primary approaches in Vietnam for increasing access to quality planting material. The status quo approach continues the government's allowance of uncertified seed sales with possible exceptions to seed imported through border points where phytosanitary inspection and quarantine are feasible. On the other hand, strict mandatory certification of planting material and rigorous enforcement of regulations is likely to have high expense to the government for implementation relative to what it currently spends to monitor VPC seeds. Given these options, we advise a middle-of-the-road approach for increasing access to quality planting material.This approach has five main pillars 1. Establish and recognize farmer-saved seed as its own seed class. Currently commercial trade of farmer-saved seed is illegal 2. Current seed sales are characterized by information asymmetries between seed sellers and buyers. This situation could be remedied by ideas such as \"truthful labeling, \" which is designed to provide buyers with information on variety name and origin, purity and germination rates to help buyers choose the appropriate product for their specific needs. \"Product traceability systems\" could allow farmers to validate the authenticity and quality of a seed package via a simple text message or a smartphone app. The technological options range from barcoded scratch cards on seed packages to blockchain technologies to store digitally unalterable information used in a market exchange.3. Investments in early-generation seed production facilities at research stations and universities could reduce costs of seed production while increasing production. The seed generated in these facilities could be used as a production input by private seed producers.Agricultural Economist, PhD m.gatto@cgiar.orgFull article: Policy options for advancing seed systems for vegetatively propagated crops in Vietnam (tandfonline.com)RTB blog post : https://www.rtb.cgiar.org/news/policy-options-to-improve-access-to-quality-seed-in-vietnam/ 4. Investment incentives and regulations might also be used to attract foreign crop-science and seed companies working in Vietnam to produce seed in-country rather than import their varieties. In the longer-term, this strategy could be used to transform Vietnam into a VPC seed production hub for Asia.5. Promote preventative pest and disease management by the use of quarantine and destroying infected crops in response to reported pest or disease incidences. Instead, require qualified inspectors to make frequent visits to identified hot spots and more closely monitor the planting material.Vietnam's Plan for Zero Hunger by 2025 calls for increasing access to nutritious foods and the diversification of diets throughout the country. Roots, tubers and bananas can play their part in achieving that goal. The contribution of VPCs depend largely on the access to affordable and accessible high-quality planting material and this access will significantly influence Vietnam's progress toward its goals. Moving from localized and informal seed systems based primarily on trust and reputation to seed systems that are scalable and resilient to climate change will require policy experimentation and innovation in seed system regulation."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1291738235.json b/main/part_2/1291738235.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72625974b42b1d1fc7884d340aa2fd709d6c3cae --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1291738235.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b10a658f0b9ef93f81eade2642f5c24a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H040688.pdf","id":"883054146"},"keywords":["informal water economies","water institutions","institutional environment","irrigation management transfer","groundwater markets","groundwater recharge","energy","fishery","fluoride","India","China","Mexico"],"sieverID":"55c005db-b531-4c67-a834-b611ba0dab7c","content":"The past decade has witnessed a growing sense of urgency in reforming water sectors in developing countries like India faced with acute water scarcity. India, like many other developing countries, is still focused on building water infrastructure and services, and making these sustainable in all senses of the term. The new wave of ideas is asking it to move from this supply-side orientation to proactive demand management by reforming water policy, water law and water administration, the so-called 'three pillars' of water institutions and policies. But making this transition is proving difficult in India and elsewhere in the developing world. Here, making water laws is easy -enforcing them is not. Renaming regional water departments as basin organizations is easy -but managing water resources at basin level is not. Declaring water an economic good is simple -but using the price mechanism to direct water to high-value uses is proving complex. This chapter explores why.It distinguishes between Institutional Environment (IE) of a country's water economy, which comprises the 'three pillars', and the Institutional Arrangements (IAs), which refer to the humanly devised rules-in-use, which drive the working of numerous informal institutions that keep a vibrant economy well lubricated. The relative influence of IE and IAs varies in high-and low-income countries because the water economies of the former are highly formalized, while those in the latter are highly informal. In high-income countries' formalized water economies, IE has an all-powerful presence in the water economy; in contrast, in highly informal water economies of low-income countries, IAs have a large role with the IE struggling to influence the working of countless tiny players in informal water institutions. The emerging discussion exhorting governments to adopt demand-side management overestimates the developing-country IE's capacity to shape the working of their informal IAs through direct regulatory means, and underestimates the potential for demand management through indirect instruments.Demand-management reforms through laws, pricing and rights reforms in informal water economies are ill advised, not because they are not badly needed but because they are unlikely to work. The real challenge of improving the working of poor-country water economies lies in four areas: (i) improving water infrastructure and services through better investment and management; (ii) promoting institutional innovations that reduce transaction costs and rationalize incentive structures; (iii) using indirect instruments to work towards publicpolicy goals in the informal sectors of the water economy; and (iv) undertaking vigorous demand management in formal segments of the water economy such as cities and industrial water users. Facilitating these requires that water resources managers adopt a broader view of policy and institutional interventions they can catalyse to achieve policy goals.A recent review of institutional changes in the water sector in 11 countries by Saleth and Dinar (2000) deals with water law, water policy and water administration, as the three pillars of institutional analysis in national water economies. This focus on law, policy and organizations as central themes of institutional analysis has been the concern of many analysts and practitioners of water resources management (see, e.g. Bandaragoda and Firdousi, 1992;Merrey, 1996;Frederickson and Vissia, 1998;Holmes, 2000;Saleth, 2004). However, if institutional change is about how societies adapt to new demands, its study needs to go beyond what government bureaucracies, international agencies and legal/regulatory systems do. People, businesses, exchange institutions, civil society institutions, religions and social movements -all these too must be covered in the ambit of institutional analysis (see, e.g. Livingston, 1993;Mestre, 1997cited in Merrey, 2000, p. 5).The current chapter takes this broader view in attempting a preliminary analysis of water institutions in India and elsewhere (see Fig. 5.1). In doing so, it draws upon the vast emerging field of New Institutional Economics (NIE) whose goal is to 'explain what institutions are, how they arise, what purposes they serve, how they change and how -if at all -they should be reformed' (Klein, 2000). We begin by borrowing from North (1990) the notion of institutions as 'formal rules, informal constraints (norms of behaviour, conventions, and self-imposed codes of conduct) and the enforcement characteristics of both'; and also the notion that 'if institutions are the rules of the game, organizations are the players'. It is also useful to borrow the important distinction drawn in the NIE between institutional environment (IE) and institutional arrangements (IAs). IE refers to the background constraints or 'rules of the game'formal and explicit (constitutions, laws, etc.) and informal and implicit (norms, customs). Thus aspects that Saleth and Dinar (2000) include in their 'institutional analysis' represent, mostly, IE. IAs, in contrast, 'are the structure 66 T. Shah that humans impose on their dealings with each other' (North, 1990).In the Indian context, then, IE would include various government agencies at different levels that directly or indirectly deal in water, international agencies, governments' water policy and water-related laws and so on. And institutions or IAs -what Williamson (1985) calls 'governance structures' -refer to entities like groundwater markets, tube well cooperatives, water user associations (WUAs), Tarun Bharat Sangh's johad (small pond) movement in Alwar (Shah and Raju, 2001), groundwater recharge movement in Saurashtra (Shah, 2000), tank fishery contractors in Bundelkhand (Shah, 2002), emergence of defluoridation plants in the cottage sector in North Gujarat's towns (Indu, 2002), private lift irrigation provisioning on a large scale from Narmada canals in Gujarat (Talati and Shah, 2004) and from government reservoirs in the Upper Krishna basin in Maharashtra (Padhiari, 2005), and urban tanker water markets operating throughout cities in India and many other developing countries (Londhe et al., 2004) and so on.We begin with three propositions:• Water institutions existing in a nation at any given point in time depend critically upon the level of formalization of its water economy; by formalization, we mean the proportion of the economy that comes under the ambit of direct regulatory influence of the IE. 1, 2 • In this sense, water sectors are highly informal in poorly developed economies and become more formalized as national economies grow. • The pace of water sector formalization in response to economic growth varies across countries and is influenced in a limited way by a host of factors but principally by the nature of the 'state' 3 (i.e. how hard or soft it is) (Myrdal, 1968). How much difference these other factors make is unclear; what is clear is that India or Tanzania cannot have Netherlands' level of formalization of its water sector at their present state of economic evolution.The level of formalization of a country's water sector is best indicated by the low level of interface between its water IAs and its water IE -or by what North (1990) calls the 'transaction sector' 4 of the water economy. Informal water economies, where the writ of 'the three pillars' does not run, are marked by heavy dependence of water users on self-provision (through private wells, streams, ponds), on informal, personalized exchange institutions or on communitymanaged water sources. In contrast, in highly formalized water economies -as in Europe and North America -self-provision disappears as a mode of securing water service; all or most users are served by service providers -privatecorporate, municipal or others -who form the interface between users and the institutional environment. Volumetric supply and economic pricing are commonly used in highly formal water sectors for cost recovery as well as for resource allocation. Here, water emerges as an organized industry easily amenable to a host of policy and management interventions that become infeasible in informal water economies.Just how informal the water economy of a developing country can be was explored by a large nationwide survey (NSSO, 1999b, p. 46) carried out in India during June-July 1998. Based on interviews with 78,990 rural households in 5110 villages throughout India, its purpose was to understand the extent to which they depended upon common property (and government) land and water resources for their consumptive and productive uses. The survey showed that only 10% of water infrastructural assets used by survey households were owned and managed by either a public or community organization. The rest were mostly owned and managed by private households or owned by the government/community but not managed by either. 5 If receiving domestic water from a 'tap' is an indicator of getting connected to a formal water supply system, the same survey also showed that over 80% of rural households were not connected with any public or community water supply system: they self-supplied their domestic water needs. In urban households (sample = 31,323 households), the situation was the reverse: 75% were connected to a public water supply system.A somewhat different 2002 survey (NSSO, 2003) showed that, of the 4646 villages covered, only 8.8% had a public/community water supply system. People living in the rest of the villages depended on wells or open water bodies for domestic water supply. A strong imprint of economic growth was evident too. The proportion of villages with a public water supply system increases rapidly as we move from a poor state to a relatively rich one. In Bihar, one of India's poorest states, none of the 364 villages covered had a public/community water supply. In the somewhat richer Haryana state, over half the villages surveyed had a public water supply system and, in still richer Goa, every village surveyed had a public water supply system.The irrigation economy of India is equally informal. A 1998 survey of 48,419 cultivators around India showed that nearly 65% used irrigation for five major field crops cultivated by them. For nearly half of these, the source of irrigation was informal, fragmented pump irrigation markets (NSSO, 1999b, p. 42), which are totally outside the ambit of direct influence of the 'three pillars'. In a 2002 survey of 4646 villages around India (NSSO, 2003), 76% of the villages reported they irrigated some of the lands. However, only 17% had access to a public irrigation system: the rest depended primarily on wells and tube wells, tanks and streams.All these surveys suggest that rural India's water economy -both domestic and irrigation use -is predominantly informal, based as it largely is on self-supply and local, informal water institutions. It has little connection with public systems and formal organizations through which the 'three pillars' typically operate in industrialized countries. 6 Figure 5.2 presents a clutch of empirically verifiable hypotheses -a set of 'iron laws of economic development' 7 -about how the economic organization of a country's water economy metamorphoses in response to economic growth and the transformation of society that comes in its wake. It is difficult to find a country in, say, sub-Saharan Africa with a modern water industry of the kind we find in a European country. South Africa is an exception: white South Africa -inhabiting its towns or operating large, commercial farms in the countryside -is served by what approximates a modern water sector. In the rural areas of the Olifants basin, for example, only 0.5% of thisT. Shah formal sector -some 1600 registered users in a population of 2.5 million -uses 95% of the water resources (Cullis and van Koppen, 2007). The former homelands, where half of South Africans live, are served by a water economy even more informal than India's.Water institutions that exist in a country or can be expected to be successfully catalysed by external actors depend upon, besides several other factors, the stage of formalization of its water economy which, in turn, depends upon the overall economic evolution of that country as outlined in Fig. 5.2. Water IAs we found in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh -such as, say, pump irrigation markets or urban tanker water markets -are unlikely to be found in Australia or Spain because they would serve nobody's purpose there. Likewise, water IAs that are standard in industrialized countries -multinationals managing a city's water supply system -would not begin to work until Dhaka has a water service market evolved, at least, to the level of Manila or Jakarta. 8In understanding how societies adapt their institutions to changing demands, Oliver Williamson (1999) suggests the criticality of social analysis at four levels. At the highest level (say L1) of social embeddedness are customs, traditions, mores and religion, which change very slowly because of the spontaneous origin of these practices in which 'deliberative choice of a calculative kind is minimally implicated'. At the second level (L2), evolutionary processes play a big role; but opportunities for design present themselves through formal rules, constitutions, laws and property rights. The challenge here is getting the rules of the game right through better definition and enforcement of property rights and contract laws. Also critical is the understanding of how things actually work -'warts and all' in some settings, but not in others. However, it is one thing to get the rules of the game (laws, policies, administrative reforms in the IE) right; it is quite another to get the play of the game (enforcement of contracts/property rights) right.This leads to the third level (L3) of institutional analysis: transaction costs of enforcement of contracts and property rights, and the governance structures through which this is done.Governance -through markets, hybrids (like public-private partnerships), firms and bureaus -is an effort to craft order, thereby mitigating conflict and realizing mutual gains. Good governance structures craft order by reshaping incentives, which leads to the fourth level (L4) of social analysis -getting the incentives right.L1 and L2 offer possibilities for change only over the long term. 9 Sectoral interventions aiming to achieve at least L2 level changes 10property rights on water through a permit system or reorienting the bureaucracy -are not uncommon; but it is virtually impossible to enduringly 11 transform only the water bureaucracy while the rest of the bureaucracy stays the same. All things considered, L3 and L4 comprise the most relevant playing field for institutional reform in the short term.An important question that New Institutional Economics (NIE) helps us explore is: 'Why do economies fail to undertake the appropriate activities if they had a high pay-off?' (North, 1990). The response to this question depends largely on L3 and L4 levels of institutional analysis. India's water sector is replete with situations where appropriate activities can potentially generate a high pay-off and yet fail to be undertaken; in contrast, much institutional reform being contemplated or attempted may not work, in the current context, because, among other things, high transaction costs make them inappropriate to undertake.An institutional change creates a 'structure' of pay-offs with gains varying across different groups of agents and, therefore, inviting different 'intensities' of responses. A small group of agents each threatened with large loss may put up a stiff resistance to a change that is beneficial for the society as a whole, and vice versa. Likewise, different groups of agents in IAs as well as in IE may experience different levels of incidence of transaction costs attendant on a change. In NIE, transaction costs are seen to include: (i) costs of search and information; (ii) costs of negotiation, bargaining and contracting; and (iii) costs of policing and enforcement of contracts, property rights, rules and laws.Our key proposition in this chapter is: for a policy or institutional intervention, all these three increase directly with the number of agents involved as well as with the strength of their preference for or against the intervention.All three costs come into play in determining the 'implementation efficacy' of an institutional intervention because each depends on the number of agents involved in a transaction, which in an informal water economy is large. Just take the case of groundwater regulation in a country like Mexico which, in some parts, faces problems of resource over-exploitation similar to those of India and the North China plains. Mexico's new Law of the Nation's Water provided for the registration of all groundwater diverters and issue of 'concessions' to each, with an entitlement to pump a permitted quota of water per year. Nearly a decade later, the 'implementation efficacy' of this policy regime has varied across different segments of groundwater diverters: municipal and industrial diverters -all large, visible entities in the formal sector -have been promptly and effectively brought within the ambit of the new Law because these large diverters are few in number. Household wells -far too numerous, and each diverting small quantities -were wisely kept out of the ambit of the law; the transaction cost of regulating them was not worth the gains in 'implementation efficacy'. 12 The real problem was with over 96,000 agricultural tube wells, some of them abstracting up to 1 million m 3 of groundwater each per year. Having registered agricultural tube wells, Mexico's CNA (Comisión Nacional del Agua) found it impossible to police and enforce concessions with the staff and resources at its command. To reduce policing and enforcement costs, CNA created COTAS (Comités Técnicos de Aguas Subterráneas), assuming that farmers would police each other better. A slew of recent studies, however, have shown that Mexico's new Law of the Nation's Water, its national water policy as well as institutions like COTAS have had no perceptible impact on groundwater abstraction for agricultural use (Shah et al., 2004b).If Mexico is serious about groundwater regulation, it will need to either find effective ways to reduce policing and enforcement costs of tube well concessions or else allocate much larger resources to absorb the high costs of policing and enforcement of groundwater concessions on 96,000 tube well owners scattered over the countryside. And if India were to try a similar strategy, it would need to provide for policing and enforcement costs for some 20 million private tube well owners scattered over 600,000 villages.One core NIE idea -especially, of the Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) branch -is that economizing on transaction costs is a key determinant of the nature of IAs that economic agents evolve. Our proposition is that players in IE of sectoral economies too are sensitive to transaction costs in designing, implementing or abandoning institutional interventions. This implies that the state too indulges in transaction cost-economizing behaviour. This is indicated by the fact that water regulations in most countries exclude small users from their ambit. Mexico's Law of the Nation's Water does not apply to anyone who stores less than 1030 m 3 of water. Australia's water law excludes users who irrigate less than 2 ha (MacDonald and Young, 2001). Water withdrawal permits instituted in South Africa and many African countries in recent years exclude domestic users, homestead gardening and stock watering (Shah and van Koppen, 2005).One rationale for leaving these out is that these represent lifeline uses of water. But another equally important reason is that the inclusion of these would hugely increase search, information and policing and enforcement costs involved in implementing the new intervention. Under its new water law, China has instituted a system of water withdrawal permits to be obtained by each tube well owner. But, in reality, except in selected provinces such as Beijing, Hebei and Shandong where tube wells are deep and heavy duty, the permits are issued to the village as a whole. Doing this defeats the intent of the law but it reduces transaction costs (Shah et al., 2004a). When transaction costs of implementing an institutional intervention become prohibitive, players in IE relinquish it rather than enforcing it at any cost.Alternatively, IE players discover wellthought out approaches to drastically reduce transaction costs. Provincial and city water bureaus in eastern China have for long tried to regulate pumping of urban groundwater aquifers that are under great stress. An array of regulatory measures -imposition of a water withdrawal fee, increases in water price, sealing of urban tube wells, etc. -failed to control urban groundwater depletion. More recently, many cities have begun sourcing water from distant reservoirs and supplying it to urban water service providers. Alternative water supply assured, many cities have quickly brought urban groundwater diverters within the regulatory fold (Shah et al., 2004a).Another example of 'transaction cost economizing' behaviour of IE players is the Mexican government's decision of levying a penal charge for electricity use by tube wells withdrawing groundwater beyond the concessioned volume. Having failed to police and enforce groundwater abstraction concessions through COTAS, the CNA found the second best approach, whose key merit is that it imposed little 'incremental' transaction cost because metered electricity use already provided a good surrogate of volumes of abstraction (Scott and Shah, 2004).In analysing the Indian institutional experience in the water sector, then, our key propositions are embodied in Fig. 5.3. It suggests that several kinds of institutional reform tried or suggested in the Indian water sector have tended to have entailed either high transaction costs (quadrant 2), low pay-offs (quadrant 4) or both (quadrant 3). In contrast, institutional changes that have quietly occurred because pay-offs are high and transaction costs low (quadrant 1) are either ignored or thwarted or, at least, not built upon. In the following sections, we briefly analyse a sample of situations in each of these four quarters in Fig. 5.3 before drawing some general implications arising from this analysis.Efficacy (Quadrants 3 and 4)When policing and enforcement costs of an intervention are high, the tendency often is to design frivolous interventions without serious intention to implement them or to abandon an intervention even if designed with serious intent. International pressure has often led to a persistent demand for a modern legislative and policy framework for orderly and effective management of the water economy and sustainable husbanding of the resource. Conditionalities imposed by donors sometimes oblige developing-country governments to agree to interventions without a local buy-in.One possible reason they submit to such pressures is their dependence on them for financialReforming Informal Water Economies 71 resources; however, it may also be that donors can pressurize governments to make laws but not to enforce them. Even if governments had a genuine intent to enforce, in a predominantly informal water economy such as India's, the transaction costs of enforcing a 'strong' water law effectively are so high that these attempts often remain cosmetic, essentially setting 'targets without teeth'. Indeed, laws and policies are often written to minimize transaction costs by progressively removing clauses that bite and are likely to be extensively violated, thereby reducing the effective regulatory powers of a law. When this is not done, decision makers responsible for enforcement shy away.The Model Groundwater Law developed by the Government of India circa 1970 is a case in point; it has been tossed around for 35 years across state capitals but it has found no takers, not only because of the virtual impossibility of reasonable enforcement but also because of the invidious political economy of rent-seeking that it may create at the local levels. The Gujarat assembly passed the law but the Chief Minister decided, wisely, not to gazette the act in view of high transaction costs of enforcing it. 13 The chief ministers of some other Indian states were, however, less transaction costsavvy. So in 1993, Maharashtra made a law with a limited ambition of disabling irrigation wells within 500 m of a Public Water Source during droughts, with a view to protecting drinking water wells. Ten years after its enactment, the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) commissioned a study of the enforcement of this law (Phansalkar and Kher, 2003). The law provides for stern action against violation but has a 'naughty' clause requiring that the law be invoked only when a 'gram panchayat (village council) files a written complaint' (which, at one stroke, reduces to a fraction the transaction costs as well as the potency of the law).The study found numerous cases of violations of the 500 m norm, yet not a single case of legal action has resulted because gram panchayats have failed to file a written complaint. It concluded that: 'There is a near complete absence of social support for the legislation. The rural lay public as well as the office bearers of gram panchayats appear inhibited and reluctant to seem to be \"revengeful\" towards those who are doing no worse than trying to earn incomes by using water for raising oranges.'Instead of invoking the law, supply-side solutions in the form of upgraded drinking water facilities and water tankers during droughts are preferred by people, gram panchayats as well as zilla parishads (district councils). IWMI also did a quick assessment of the Andhra Pradesh Water and Trees Act (Narayana and Scott 2004), 14 and concluded on a similar pessimistic note. A similar exercise has been the formulation of the official Government of India Water Policy of 1987 and 2002. Both these pieces are an excellent example of bland, almost tonguein-cheek, enunciations that are not designed to change anything in any manner. 15 As a result, they have low transaction costs, but also no pay-off.Other widely espoused proposals entail high transaction costs and promise doubtful benefits -at least in the prevailing circumstances. A good example in India is the effort to introduce volumetric pricing of electricity supply to groundwater irrigators after having given up on it decades previously. It was the high transaction costs of metering over a million irrigation pump-sets -which involved installing and maintaining meters, reading them every month, billing based on metered consumption of power but, more importantly, controlling pilferage, tampering with meters with or without collusion with meter readers, etc. -that obliged State Electricity Boards (SEBs) to switch to a flat tariff during the 1970s (Shah, 1993).A flat tariff, collected based on the size of the pump horsepower rather than on the metered consumption of electricity for pumping, succeeded in reducing transaction costs of serving a market where derived demand for electricity was confined to periods of peak irrigation requirements. It would have been a viable system if SEBs had learnt to ration power supply to agriculture and gradually raise the flat tariffs to break-even levels. However, neither happened; farmer lobbies have managed all along to prevent upward revision in the flat tariff while compelling the SEBs to maintain electricity supply to the farm sector. The invidious nexus between energy and irrigationwhich has contributed to the bankruptcy of the Indian power sector and rampant over-exploitation of groundwater -has been discussed by Shah et al. (2004c). We simply summarize its conclusion here.In the thinking of SEBs and multilateral donors about ways out of this imbroglio, a return to metering power is critical, even if it means taking on farmer lobbies. Several chief ministers have tried to bite the bullet in the past few years. But farmers' opposition has been so strong, swift and strident that they have been either felled or obliged to retract. Some, as in Punjab and Tamilnadu, have done away with farm power tariff altogether. Recommending metering farm electricity in today's setting is asking politicians to do hara-kiri.But even if a politician were to succeed in metering farm power supply, it would probably change little because, if anything, transaction costs of metered power supply are much higher today than they were in the 1970s. Most states have at least eight to ten times more irrigation tube wells today than they had during the 1970s; and farming livelihoods depend far more critically on electricity today than 30 years ago. If metering must work in the India of today, we must learn from the Chinese experiments, which always stuck with metering, and then focus on modifying the incentive structures to address many of the problems metering faces in India (see Shah et al., 2004a).Surprisingly, the electricity-irrigation nexus is not a subject of discussion in China at all. The Chinese electricity supply industry operates on two principles: (i) total cost recovery in generation, transmission and distribution at each level, with some minor cross-subsidization across user groups and areas; and (ii) each user pays in proportion to their metered use. Unlike in much of South Asia, rural electricity throughout China was charged at a higher rate than urban; and agriculture paid more than domestic and industrial use until a few years ago (Wang et al., 2004).Until 1997, the responsibility for operation and maintenance of the village electricity infrastructure and user charge recovery lay with the village committee. The standard arrangement in use was for the village committee and the township electricity bureau to appoint and train one or more local farmers as part-time village electricians with dual responsibility for: (i) main-taining the power supply infrastructure in the village; and (ii) collecting user charges for a transformer assigned to him/her based on metered individual consumption from all categories of users. The sum of power use recorded in the meters attached to all irrigation pumps had to tally with the power supply recorded at the transformer for any given period. The electrician was required to pay the township electricity bureau for power use recorded at the transformer level.This arrangement did not always work easily. Where power supply infrastructure was old and worn out, line losses below the transformer made this difficult. To allow for normal line losses, a 10% allowance was given by the township electricity bureau to the electrician. However, even this must have made it difficult for the latter to tally the two; as a result, an electricity network reform programme was undertaken by the national government to modernize and rehabilitate rural power infrastructure. 16 Where this was done, line losses fell sharply, 17 and among a sample of ten villages I visited in 2003, none had a problem tallying power consumption recorded at the transformer level with the sum of consumption recorded by individual users, especially with the line loss allowance of 10%.It is interesting that the village electrician in Henan and Hebei provinces in North China is able to deliver on a fairly modest reward of US$24-30/month plus an incentive bonus of around $24/month (Zhang, 2004), which is equivalent to the value of wheat produced on 1 mu (or 0.67 ha) of land. For this rather modest wage, China's village electrician undertakes to make good to the township electricity station the full amount on line and commercial losses in excess of 10% of the power consumption recorded on the transformers; if he can manage to keep losses to less than 10%, he can keep 40% of the value of power saved. This generates a powerful incentive for him to reduce line losses.In the way that the Chinese collect metered electricity charges, it is well nigh impossible to make financial losses since these are firmly passed on downstream from one level to the next. Take, for example, the malpractice common in South Asia of end-users tampering with meters or bribing the meter reader to under-report actual consumption. In the Chinese system, it is very unlikely that such malpractices could occur on a large scale, since the village electrician is faced with serious personal loss if he fails to collect from the farmers electricity charges for at least 90% of power consumed as reported at the transformer meter. And since malpractice by a farmer directly hits other farmers in the village, there is likely to exist strong peer control over such practices.In making metered power pricing work, China's unique advantage is its strong villagelevel authority structure. The village committee, and especially, the village party leader, is respected and feared. These factors ensure that the electrician is able to do his or her job. In comparison to China's village committees, India's village Panchayats are utterly devoid of power, as well as authority, as institutions for local governance.In India a similar experiment was tried out in Orissa, where private companies in charge of distribution first experimented with village vidyut sanghas (electricity cooperatives) by forming 5500 of them but are now veering around to private entrepreneurs as electricity retailers. Mishra (2004), who carried out an assessment of Orissa reforms for the IWMI-Tata programme, visited a number of these sanghas during 2003 and noted that: 'None of the village committees were operational.' These worked as long as the support organization hired to catalyse them propped them up with constant visits and organizational work; as soon as the support organization was withdrawn, the village vidyut sanghas became defunct. Mishra (2004) wrote: 'The situation today is quite similar to that [which] existed earlier before the interventions were made through the Committee.' Sanghas having failed, power distribution companies appointed three private entrepreneurs as franchisees on terms similar to those facing China's village electricians. These have resulted in sustained and significant improvements in billing and collection of electricity dues.The Orissa experiment and the Chinese experience suggest that, in principle, it is possible to make volumetric pricing and collection of electricity charges work if private entrepreneurs are given appropriate incentives. However, in Orissa, the electricity use in agriculture is less than 5%. If the same arrangement were to work in Punjab, Haryana or Gujarat or several other states where electricity use in the farm sector is 30% or more, farmer resistance would be greater and commensurate with the effectiveness of the volumetric pricing. And one thing that private power retailers in Indian villages would have to do without is the authority of the village party leader that helps China's village electricians to firmly pass on all costs to farmers. In the absence of such authority structures, private entrepreneurs would expect very high margins to assume the role of retailing power on a volumetric basis. This -as well as farmer propensity to frustrate metering -would raise transaction costs of metering to very high levels. If the ultimate purpose of volumetric pricing is to improve the finances of electricity utilities, I doubt this purpose would be achieved.In a recent paper (Shah et al., 2004c), we have argued that, in making an impossibly bad situation better, a more practical course available to SEBs and state governments is to stay with flat tariffs but to rationalize them through intelligent management of power supply. Farmers' needs for power are different from those of households or industries: they need plentiful power on 30-40 days of the year when crops face acute moisture stress. However, in most states, they receive a constant 8-10 h/day of poor-quality power supply throughout the year. If SEBs were to invest in understanding that their farmers are customers, it should be possible for them to supply 20 h/day of good-quality power to farmers on 30-40 days of peak irrigation need while maintaining 3-4 h/day supply on other days. In order for such an approach to work, the nature and capabilities of the power utilities have to change; so also does the thinking of donors and governments.In sum, in improving the working of India's water economy, many policy and institutional interventions -already tried and watered down, or on the discussion table -are of little value because its predominantly informal nature makes its policing and enforcement costs prohibitive. India is not alone in devoting energies and resources to these.In Africa several countries have, during recent years, experimented with demand management ideas such as pricing of water, instituting water withdrawal permits and restructuring regional water departments as river basin organizations. Although it may be too early to write a report on these, countries like Ghana are already having second thoughts. The concerns are of five kinds: (i) most reforms have remained largely unimplemented, especially in the informal segments of the water economy that encompass most of the users and uses; (ii) nowhere have the reforms produced evidence of improved performance of the water economy, except in countries with a large formal water economy; (iii) implementation of reforms has disrupted customary arrangements for water management that was robust enough to, at least, survive the test of time; (iv) when zealously implemented, reforms -especially water permits and water taxes -hit poor people in remote rural areas hard; and (v) 'demand management reforms' deflected national IE players from pursuing water sector priorities important to them, namely improving water infrastructure and services to their people (Shah and van Koppen, 2005).Rather than evolving organically from the unfolding situation on the ground -and therefore being demanded by stakeholders -many of the reforms currently being pursued in India, such as Irrigation Management Transfer (IMT), River Basin Management and metering of electricity are actually promoted aggressively by both researchers and funding agencies, 18 and are sometimes out of sync with the prevailing Indian context. By far the most frequent are situations where institutional interventions proposed would yield high productivity pay-offs if successful; but they rarely succeed because of high transaction costs.In independent India's history, the 'communitarian ideal' -the notion that villagers will instantly come together to take over the responsibility of participatory, democratic management of virtually anything (land, water, watersheds, forests, irrigation systems, river basins) -has been behind innumerable abortive institutional interventions. What has helped fuel this enthusiasm for participatory irrigation management (PIM) by farmers are occasional examples of such models having worked reasonably well either in the industrialized countries or in India itself, but under the tutelage of an inspired local leader or an industrious NGO. Its having worked in a few situations in exceptional conditions becomes the basis for designs of major programmes of institutional interventions, commonly bankrolled by a supportive donor.One classic example of ideas in this genre is PIM (or its cousin IMT) which has been, for the past four decades, the ruling mantra for improving the productivity of irrigation systems in India. What is extraordinary about this preoccupation with PIM (or IMT) is the sway it has continued to hold on players in water IE, despite virtually no evidence of it having succeeded anywhere else except on an experimental scale, that too with facilitation of nonreplicable quality and scale. 19 The idea of farmers managing irrigation canals is not new; the British tried hard in the late 19th century to get farmers from the Indus and Ganges areas to participate in irrigation management but without much success, except in enforcing warabandi (rotational methods for equitable allocation of available water) in the Indus canals (Whitcombe, 1984). More recently, since 1960, WUAs (Water Users' Associations) have been tried out on small irrigation systems. Uttar Pradesh tried sinchai samitis (irrigation committees) way back in the early 1960s on irrigation tanks and reservoirs; following that, Madhya Pradesh too tried it on thousands of its minor irrigation tanks.Other states have been trying to make pani panchayats (water councils) work. But sinchai samitis of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh have disappeared without trace; and so have pani panchayats in Gujarat and elsewhere. Yet, Orissa recently made a law that transferred all its minor irrigation systems to instantly created pani panchayats. Gujarat introduced joint irrigation management programmes as far back as in 1983, but the 17 irrigation cooperatives lost money and became defunct. In 1991 it made another attempt, this time around with assistance from NGOs; 144 irrigation cooperatives were formed to cover 45,000 ha of irrigated area (Shukla, 2004); however, it is difficult to see precisely in what way these areas are better off than other command areas.Indeed, a core idea of Command Area Development Agencies (CADAs) in the early 1980s was to involve farmer organizations in the management of irrigation projects. But we see no trace of CADAs or their beneficiary farmers' associations (BFAs), even in Kerala where thousands of these were formed under a 'big bang' approach in 1986. An assessment by Joseph (2001) in the late 1990s suggested that, even in this land of strong traditions of local governance, good education and high levels of public participation, BFAs were a damp squib. 20 As in Kerala, Andhra Pradesh overnight transferred the management of all its irrigation systems to over 10,000 WUAs created by the automobile company Fiat and a World Bank loan; this 'big bang' approach to PIM has attracted all-round interest; however, now that the World Bank funds retailed to WUAs for maintenance are over, field observers are beginning to wonder precisely what the WUAs are doing better (Jairath, 2001). 21 The central assumption underlying PIM/IMT is that, once irrigation management is transferred from remote bureaucracies to WUAs, the financial viability of the systems would improve and so would the quality and reliability of irrigation. Physical and value productivity of water and land would increase. As a result, irrigation systems would better achieve their potential for food and livelihood security for farmers in their command. PIM/IMT programmes have belied many of these expectations, even in countries like Turkey, Mexico and Philippines where they are known to have succeeded. As a result, early expectations from PIM/IMT have been increasingly moderated and IMT is now considered successful even if it just 'saves the government money, improves cost effectiveness of operation and maintenance while improving, or at least not weakening, the productivity of irrigated agriculture' (Vermillion, 1996, p. 153). The drift of the IMT discussion then, in recent times, has been more towards getting irrigation off the back of the governments than towards improving the lot of the farmers and the poor, the original goal at which much public irrigation investment has been directed over the past 50 years. Some over-arching patterns emerge from a reading of the international experience. IMT has tended to be smooth, relatively effortless and successful where:• The irrigation system is central to a dynamic, high-performing agriculture. • The average farm size is large enough for a typical or a significant proportion of the command area farmers to operate like agrobusinessmen.• The farm producers are linked with global input and output markets. • The costs of self-managed irrigation are an insignificant part of the gross value of product of farming.These are the conditions -all of which enhance the pay-offs, reduce transaction costs or both -obtained in Mexico, the USA and New Zealand, from where emerge the resounding success stories we hear about IMT 22 (Shah et al., 2002). In South Africa the commercial farming sector, which satisfies all these conditions, took naturally to PIM through its irrigation boards; but the same logic when applied to irrigation systems serving smallholders in former homelands met with resounding failure because these met none of the conditions that irrigation boards satisfied (Shah et al., 2002).Even where all conditions are satisfied and PIM/IMT declared 'successful', researchers have presented a mixed picture of resultant impacts. For example, an exhaustive global review carried out for IWMI of IMT impacts by Douglas Vermillion, a pioneer in IMT research, showed that impacts are significant and unambiguously beneficial in terms of cost recovery in Turkey, Mexico, the USA and New Zealand. Fee collection has improved; agency staff strength has declined. But the impact of management transfer on agricultural productivity and farm incomes is far less unequivocal even in these countries (Vermillion, 1996, p. 153). In Philippines, the Mecca of IMT and PIM, recent studies show that productivity gains from PIM have not been sustained (Panella, 1999).None of the conditions outlined above are obtained in a typical Indian surface irrigation system. Most farmers in the command have small-holdings, subdivided further into smaller parcels. A typical major system has hundreds of thousands of smallholders, making it well nigh impossible to bring them all together to negotiate. Over 90% of the surface water irrigated area in India is under field crops yielding Rs 15,000-18,000 (US$325-400)/ha of gross value of output, compared with US$3000-7500/ha in high-value farming in industrialized countries. Irrigation systems are at the heart of the farming economy of command areas. However, the mushrooming of wells and tube wells, and booming pump irrigation markets in command areas and in the neighbourhood of irrigation tanks have reduced farmers' stakes in managing surface irrigation systems. Head-reach and tail-end farmers almost always have opposing motivations when it comes to management reform, with the former interested in preserving the status quo and the latter interested in change.All these, together, raise the transaction costs of implementing management reform through PIM/IMT-type interventions. The prospects become worse because, almost everywhere, the agency's purpose in promoting PIM is to get WUAs to assume arduous responsibilities -maintenance, fee collection, mobilization of voluntary labour for repair and maintenance works, etc. Moreover, farmers are generally quick to figure out that PIM often means increased water fees without corresponding improvement in service quality. These reduce the perceived pay-offs from reform.All in all, decades invested in the hope that PIM or IMT would spearhead productivity improvements in public irrigation are decades wasted. PIM has not achieved any significant success on a meaningful scale anywhere in India, and it will indeed be a great surprise if it does in the existing IE marked by hopelessly low irrigation fees, extremely poor collection and poor main system management.There are similar institutional misadventures in other spheres. In growing regions where fluoride contamination of groundwater is endemic, governments and donors have tried setting up village-based reverse osmosis-type plants or Nalgonda-type defluoridation plants to control the growing menace of dental and skeletal fluorosis. Again, the management model chosen is communitarian, and these have invariably failed. In Gujarat, out of dozens of such plants set up during the 1980s and 1990s, not one has operated for more than a few months.An older experiment with a communitarian model has been with inland fishery cooperatives. Numerous local water bodies controlled by irrigation departments, zilla panchayats, taluka panchayats (sub-district councils) and gram panchayats can potentially sustain a vibrant inland fishing enterprise and livelihood system. However, government policy has always been to give away monopoly lease rights to registered fisher-people's cooperatives. Thousands of such cooperatives are registered; but probably a very small fraction -in my surmise, less than 1 or 2% -operate as dynamic producer cooperatives as, for instance, the dairy cooperatives do in Gujarat.In South India, which has over 300,000 irrigation tanks, a decades-old concern has been about the breakdown of traditions of maintenance of bunds and supply channels, orderly distribution of water and protection from encroachment. Several donor-supported projects first aimed at 'engineering rehabilitation' and restored tank infrastructure to their original -or even a bettercondition. However, when rehabilitation of tanks again declined and needed another round of rehabilitation, planners found something amiss in their earlier approach. Therefore, in new tank rehabilitation programmes -such as the new World Bank project in Karnataka -an institutional component is added to the engineering component. But the institutional component invariably consists of registering a WUA of command area farmers. Except where such WUAs have been constantly animated and propped up by support NGOs -as in the case of the Dhan Foundation in Madurai, Tamilnadu -it is difficult to find evidence of productivity improvements in tanks because of WUAs on any significant scale (Shah et al., 1998).Besides the problem of high transaction costs of co-coordinating, negotiating, rule making and, above all, rule enforcement and improving the management of tanks -more in North India than in South India -face some special problems. One of them is of aligning conflicting interests of multiple stakeholders. Command area farmers have a direct conflict of interest with tank-bed farmers; and well owners in the neighbourhood of tanks are a potential threat to all other users because they can virtually steal tank water by pumping from their wells. Then, there are fishing contractors whose interests also clash with those of irrigators, especially during the dry season (Shah and Raju, 2001). Registering a WUA of command area farmers and hoping that this 'institutional intervention' would increase productivity of tanks is extremely naive. Improved management of public irrigation systems, tanks and fishery represents opportunities for high pay-off but has failed to be realized because the institutional models promoted have high transaction costs.Ignored (Quadrant 1)The core of New Institutional Economics is the notion that productivity of resources in an economy is determined by technology employed and institutions. And if 'institutions affect economic performance by determining transaction and transformation (production) costs', then the Indian water sector is brimming with institutional changes occurring on the margins that are doing this all the time, and yet are either glossed over (or even frowned upon) by the players in the IE. Most such institutions we explore in this section are invariably swayambhoo 23 (self-creating and spontaneous); they have come up on a significant enough scale to permit generic lessons. These invariably involve entrepreneurial effort to reduce transaction costs; they serve an important economic purpose, improve welfare and raise productivity; they are commonly faced with an adverse or unhelpful IE. Crucially, these constitute the instrumentality of the players of the game, and sustain as long as they serve their purpose. The emergence of tube well technology has been the biggest contributor to growth in irrigation in post-independent India; and the spontaneous rise of groundwater (or, more appropriately, pump irrigation service) markets has done much to multiply the productivity and welfare impact of tube well irrigation. The Indian irrigation establishment is probably out of touch with the changing face of its playing field: it still believes that only 38% of the gross cropped area is irrigated, 55% of it by groundwater wells. But concerning the reality of Indian irrigation at the dawn of the millennium, the tail has begun wagging the dog. 24 IE in the Indian water sector has little or no interface with either the 75% of Indian irrigation occurring through tube wells or with the institution of water markets.The working of groundwater markets has now been extensively studied (see Shah, 1993;Janakarajan, 1994;Saleth, 1998;Singh and Singh, 2003;Mukherji, 2004 for a good survey of the literature). These studies analyse myriad ways in which their working differs across space and time. But common elements of groundwater markets everywhere in the Indian subcontinent are the features we listed at the start of this section: (i) they are swayambhoo; (ii) they operate on such a large scale as to account for over one-quarter of the Indian irrigated areas; (iii) water sellers everywhere constantly innovate to reduce transaction costs and create value; (iv) water markets are the instrumentality of buyers and sellers of pump irrigation service, and not of society at large or the IE; (v) as a result, water markets are unrepentant when their operation produces externalities such as groundwater depletion or drying up of wetlands; and, finally, (vi) despite their scale and significance, the IE has been blind towards the potential of water markets to achieve larger policy ends. When they take notice of their existence and role -which is seldom -water policy makers are often unable to decide whether they deserve promotion or regulation.Much the same is the case with many other water institutions. In the previous section, I mentioned tens of thousands of fishermen's cooperatives that are lying defunct. However, pond fishery entrepreneurs have sprung up everywhere who use 'paper' cooperatives as a front for operating profitable culture fisheries. Why don't fisher cooperatives exploit the economic opportunities that these contractors are able to? The most important reason is the transaction costs of protecting their crop. Culture fishery is capital intensive but affords a high yield. In common property village or irrigation tanks with multiple stakeholders, in order to remain viable the fishermen should be able to meet many conditions. They should effectively defend their rights against poachers, and against irrigators who may want to pump tank water below the sill level during dry periods to irrigate crops, or against tank-bed cultivators who want to empty the tank so they can begin sowing.In South Asia, fisher communities are commonly from the lowest rung of the village society. They would not only have difficulty in mobilizing capital to buy seedlings and manure but also in protecting the crop from poaching from outsiders, from the local bigwigs as well as from their own members. Fisher cooperatives, as a result, always underinvest. Reserving fishing contracts for fisher cooperatives is therefore the best formula for sustained low productivity of the inland fishery economy.We discovered just how high the transaction cost of protecting a fish crop was when we studied who precisely the fishing contractors were in two separate studies in central Gujarat and Bundelkhand. We found that, in both the regions, the key characteristic of people who emerged as successful fishing contractors was a painstakingly cultivated image of a toughie, or a ruffian capable of enforcing his rights even by using violence. In Bundelkhand, 'Everywhere the fishing contractors involved stopped farmers from lifting water from the tank once the last five feet of water was left. They had invested in fish production and now were making sure they get their money's worth' (Shah, 2002, p. 3).In central Gujarat, fishing contractors often have to resort to violence and even undergo a jail term to establish that they meant business when it came to defending their property right. 25 Despite this unsavoury aspect, I would not be much off the mark in suggesting that the explosive increase in inland fishery in India during the past 40 years is the result of two factors: (i) introduction of new technologies of culture fishery along with its paraphernalia; and (ii) gradual emasculation by the fishing contractors of the idealized fisher cooperatives as monopoly lease holders on water bodies. Had the cooperative ideal been enforced vigorously, India's inland fishery would not have emerged as the growth industry it is today.How changing IE policy unleashes productive forces in an economy is best illustrated by the evolution of Gujarat's inland fishery policy over the past 30 years (Pandya, 2004). Following early attempts to intensify inland fisheries during the 1940s, Gujarat Government's Fisheries Department began supporting village panchayats to undertake intensive culture fishery in village tanks during early 1960. However, the programme failed to make headway, partly because of popular resistance to fish culture in this traditionally vegetarian state and partly because of rampant poaching from local fisher-folk that village panchayats, as managers, could not control. In a modified programme, the Fisheries Department took over the management of tanks from the panchayats to raise fishery to a produce-sharing basis; but the Department was less effective than the panchayats in checking poaching. In 1973, a special notification of the Government of Gujarat transferred inland fishing rights on all water bodies, including village tanks, to the Fisheries Department, which now set about forming fishermen's cooperatives in a campaign mode. The idea was to entrust the management to the community of poachers themselves.In the Kheda district of Gujarat, for example, 27 such cooperatives were formed to undertake intensive culture fishing. However, these were none the better when it came to controlling poaching -including that by their own members; and the gross revenues could not even meet the bank loans. Members lost heart and cooperatives became defunct, a story that has been endlessly repeated in various fields in India's history of the cooperative movement. While all manner of government subsidies were on offer, what made culture fishery unviable were three factors: (i) a lease offered for only 3 years, a period considered too short to recoup the investment made; (ii) only registered cooperatives could be given a lease and the process of registration was transaction-costly; and (iii) rampant poaching and the high cost of policing and preventing it.All this time, culture fishery productivity was steadily rising. Although fisher cooperatives were not doing well, culture fishery was, as entrepreneurs began using cooperatives as a front to win leases on common property water bodies. Doing this entailed significant transaction costs; office bearers of cooperatives had to be paid off, and gram panchayat leaders kept in good humour so that the lease would be renewed. Even then, whenever a gram panchayat leadership changed, the new order would terminate the contract to favour a new contractor. This dampened the contractors' interest in investing in high productivity.In 1976, the government began setting up fish farmers' development agencies in each district to implement a new Intensive Fish Culture Programme. Terms of lease began to undergo change: private entrepreneurs were, in principle, considered for giving away leases but there was a pecking order of priority where first priority was for a Below Poverty Line (BPL) family, followed by a local poor fisherman, then a local cooperative and, if none of these were available, to any entrepreneur who bid in an open auction.Earlier, the government had paid a puny rental to the gram panchayats for using their tanks for fish culture. Now that entrepreneurs were allowed, gram panchayats began quoting an 'upset price' derived as an estimate of the 'fishing value' of the tank, which was often 20 to 30 times the rental panchayats received earlier from the Department. Even so, as soon as leases were open to entrepreneurs, many came forward. A later change in policy gave cooperatives some discount in the 'upset price' and other benefits. In general, the IE's outlook constantly remained favourable to cooperatives and suspicious of entrepreneurs. In 2003, a series of new changes in the policy framework gave a further fillip to productivity growth: the lease period was extended from 3 to 10 years, which reduced the contractors' vulnerability to changes in panchayat leadership. It also made investment in productivity enhancement attractive. The new policy also removed the last vestiges of special treatment to cooperatives, and provided for a public auction of the lease after open advertisement.During 1971-1998, the inland fishery output of Gujarat increased sixfold from 14,000 mt (metric tons) in 1971 to over 80,000 mt in 1998-1999(Government of Gujarat, 2004). Considering that Gujarat had hardly any culture fishery before 1950, it must be said that the credit for this growth rightly belongs to the government's efforts. The government invested in subsidies, organizing inputs, bringing in new technology, extension and training and much else. All these played a role in expanding the fisheries economy. However, perhaps, the most important impact has been produced by two factors: (i) the changes made at the margins in the leasing policies of water bodies that have shaped the transaction costs of setting up and operating a profitable culture fishery business; and (ii) the high costs of controlling poaching, which has ensured that, besides several entrepreneurial qualities, successful fishing contrac-tors also have to acquire and deploy muscle power.Several less sensational examples can be offered of spontaneous institutions that operate on a large scale to serve purposes for which water establishments often promote copybook institutions such as WUAs. I briefly mentioned earlier how hundreds of defunct community reverse osmosis (RO) or defluoridation plants set up by governments and donors to supply fluoride-free drinking water to village communities have failed under community management. However, in North Gujarat, as a demand curve has emerged for fluoride-free drinking water, some 300 plants selling packed desalinated water have mushroomed in the cottage sector. Over half of these have been set up since 2001, mostly in mofussil (small towns) to serve permanent customers, as well as to retail water in polythene pouches. 26 The RO cottage industry of Gujarat was quietly serving a growing demand when the 'IE' caught up with it. In 2001, the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) made it compulsory for cottage RO plants to achieve the ISI mark. 27 This entailed that each plant had to invest Rs 0.3-0.4 million ($6500-8670) in an in-house laboratory and pay an annual certification fee of Rs 84,000 ($1870) to the ISI. This single move immobilized the emerging RO water cottage industry; 200 operators had to close their businesses because the new announcement doubled their cost of production. Yet, setting up an in-house laboratory and paying an annual certification fee implied no guarantee of quality assurance because BIS inspectors hardly visit plants, if ever. Many customers (Indu, 2002) interviewed wondered if the ISI mark -like the AGMARK (standardized certification for agricultural food products) ghee and honey -can by itself guarantee quality unless BIS itself put its act together in the first place.Likewise, many state governments are struggling, in vain, to cut their losses from operating mostly World Bank-funded public tube well programmes by trying to transfer these to idealized cooperatives registered under the Cooperative Act. If the purpose of a cooperative tube well is to enable a group of farmers to mobilize capital, to install and operate a tube well for the mutual benefit of members, such tube well groups have existed for decades in North Gujarat. The difference is that, having been created to serve the purpose of their members, their ownership structure and operating rules are designed to minimize the transaction costs of cooperating on a sustained basis (Shah and Bhattacharya, 1993). The Government of Gujarat tried hard to transfer its public tube wells to idealized cooperatives but, thanks to the very high transaction costs relative to the pay-off facing potential entrepreneurs, the programme made no headway until 1998 when the terms of turnover were rewritten. 28 Basically, the requirement that a cooperative be registered under the Cooperative Act was dropped; the lease period was extended from 1 to 5 years; and changes were introduced that made it possible for one or few major stakeholders to assume the role of tube well manager and residual claimant. These minor changes suddenly gave a fillip to the turnover programme and, over a 3-year period, over half of Gujarat's public tube wells, some 3500 in all, were transferred to farmer groups. An IWMI-Tata study of turned-over public tube wells (Mukherji and Kishore, 2003) showed that, within 1 year of the turnover, the performance of turned-over tube wells, in terms of area irrigated, hours of operation, quality of service, O&M and financial results improved. Two years after the turnover, it improved dramatically.In opening this section, I talked about the significance of groundwater markets in India's irrigation. However, private provision of water services is also an important part of India's urban reality. In an IWMI-Tata study of six cities -Indore, Jaipur, Nagpur, Ahmedabad, Bangalore and Chennai - Londhe et al. (2004) found that municipal agencies supplied only 51% of the demand calculated at 80 l per capita per day.In Chennai and Ahmedabad, formal organizations served only 10 and 26%, respectively, of the 'normative' demand, the balance being either self-supplied or served by informal sector players. 'Tanker markets' supply 21, 12 and 10% of the demand in Chennai, Indore and Jaipur, respectively. In Chennai, tanker operators have year-round operations and even have an association. In other cities, tanker markets emerge during the summer and quietly disappear as the monsoon arrives. Londhe et al. (2004) estimate that some 3000 tankers in the six cities operate a water trade worth Rs 203 crore (US$45 million)/year. Despite being key players in urban water sectors: 'There is no record with any government department about its size, scale and modus operandi. There is an absence of any government regulation on groundwater withdrawals. Except in Chennai, municipal authorities refuse to even acknowledge the existence of such markets' (Londhe et al., 2004).Tanker markets operate much like any other market, and serve those who can pay for their services. The IWMI-Tata study estimated that 51% of consumers in the six cities are from high-income groups, 43% from middle-income groups and only 6% from low-income groups. Contrary to belief that the poorest pay the most for water, the IWMI-Tata study showed that the poorest pay the least, even when transaction costs and imputed cost of labour and time in fetching water are factored in (Londhe et al., 2004).One more case of institutions that 'planners propose and people dispose' that I want to discuss briefly concerns the world-famous Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) on the Narmada river. SSP must be one of the world's mostplanned projects. One of SSP's key planning premises was that the Project would construct lined canals with gated structures going right up to the village service area (VSA), comprising some 400 ha of command. A WUA would be organized in each VSA that would simultaneously construct the sub-minor and field channels to convey water from the pucca (lined minor) to the fields. When SSP water was first released to some 80,000 ha of the command just below the dam in 2001, the Project managers registered, on a war footing, WUAs as cooperatives in some 1100 VSAs. When the water was finally released, however, the villagelevel distribution structure was not ready in a single village.And it will never be, as we learnt in the course of a quick assessment of farmer preparedness to receive Narmada irrigation (Talati and Shah, 2004). The perceived sum of the transaction and transformation cost 29 of constructing village distribution systems seemed by far to outweigh the benefits people expected of SSP. There was, however, a flurry of activity as SSP water began flowing into minors.According to our quick estimates, several thousand diesel pumps and several million metres of rubber pipes were purchased by water entrepreneurs to take water to their own fields and to provide irrigation services to others.The trend for new investments in diesel pumps and rubber pipes gathered further momentum in 2002 and 2003; and we found that village communities were none the worse for having violated the SSP planning assumption. The Government of Gujarat is, however, adamant on constructing a 'proper' village distribution system in the SSP commandnever mind whether it will take 50 years to complete the canal network. 30 The swayambhoo institutions I have discussed in this section are all driven by opportunism. However, large-scale swayambhoo institutions are often driven by more complex motives including long-term, collective selfinterest. The decentralized mass movement for rainwater harvesting and groundwater recharge that the Saurashtra region of Gujarat saw from 1987 until 1998, when it became co-opted by the state government, is a good example of such an institutional development (Shah, 2000).The movement was catalysed first by stray experiments of 'barefoot hydrologists' in modifying open wells to collect monsoonal flood waters. Early successes fired the imagination of a people disillusioned with ineffective government programmes. Soon, well recharge was joined by other water-capture structures such as check dams and percolation tanks. With all manner of experimentation going on, a kind of subaltern hydrology of groundwater recharge developed and became energetically disseminated. Religious leaders of sects like Swadhyaya Pariwar and Swaminarayana Sampradaya ennobled this work in their public discourses by imbuing it with a larger social purpose. The gathering movement generated enormous local goodwill and released philanthropic energies on an unprecedented scale, with diamond merchants -originally from Saurashtra but now settled in Surat and Belgium -offering cash, cement companies offering cement at discounted prices and communities offering millions of days of voluntary labour.In neighbouring Rajasthan, Alwar was also undergoing similar mass action; but it was far more limited in scale, and was orchestrated by Rajendra Singh's Tarun Bharat Sangh, a grass-roots organization. Saurashtra's recharge movement was truly multicentric, unruly, spontaneous and wholly internally funded with no support from government, international donors or the scientific community -until 1998, when the Government of Gujarat became involved and proceeded to rid the movement of its quintessentially swayambhoo and voluntary character by announcing a subsidy programme (Shah, 2000;Shah and Desai, 2002).It is difficult to assess the social value of this movement, partly because 'formal hydrology' and 'popular hydrology' have failed to find a meeting ground. Scientists want check dams sited near recharge zones; villagers want them close to their wells. Scientists recommend recharge tube wells to counter the silt layer impeding recharge; farmers just direct flood water into their wells after filtering. Scientists worry about upstream-downstream externalities; farmers say everyone lives downstream. Scientists say the hard-rock aquifers have too little storage to justify the prolific growth in recharge structures; people say a check dam is worthwhile if their wells provide even 1000 m 3 of life-saving irrigation/ha in times of delayed rain. Hydrologists keep writing the obituary of the recharge movement; but the movement has spread from eastern Rajasthan to Gujarat, thence to Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh. Protagonists think that, with better planning and larger coverage, the decentralized recharge movement can be a major response to India's groundwater depletion problem because it can ensure that water tables in pockets of intensive use rebound to pre-development levels at the end of the monsoonal season every year they have a good monsoon.Table 5.1 offers a comparative view of a sample of six 'high pay-off-low transactioncost' institutions that have emerged in India's water sector in recent years. If we judge institutions by their contribution to increasing productivity and welfare, all six can be considered successful. Each can be found to operate on a significant scale, thus permitting generic lessons. One notable aspect is that each institution has arisen spontaneously and flourished as an instrumentality of its players, serving a purpose important to them though not necessarily of the IE players. Each has devised its own methods of reducing transaction costs and managing incentive structures. Finally, each is widely viewed in the IE -by government officials, NGOs, researchers, international experts and even local opinion leaders -as a subaltern or inferior alternative to the mainstream notion of an institution considered ideal but that has not worked on a desired scale or in a desired manner. As a result, far from recognizing the potential of these subaltern institutions to further larger social goals, the outlook has been to ignore their existence and social value, or even to emasculate them.The repertoire of institutional arrangements that operate on a large scale includes numerous 'successes' of varied types and scales produced by exceptional local leaders and industrious NGOs. By virtue of exceptional and highly scarce resources at their command -such as reputation, social status, allegiance of people, funds, goodwill, influence in the IE, skilled manpower -local leaders and NGOs are often able to drastically reduce transaction costs of fostering institutional change of a certain kind in a limited setting for a limited period. Out of hundreds of thousands of irrigation tanks in India that can produce large pay-offs from improved management, there are but a few hundred in which exceptional local leaders have established and sustained novel institutions for upkeep, maintenance, management and use of tanks to improve the welfare of the community. The IWMI-Tata Programme studied some 50 of these during 2002-2003(Sakthivadivel et al., 2004) ) and found that, while the architecture of institutions (as rules-inuse) varied from case to case, the common aspect of all successful tank institutions was a leader or a leadership compact which, by virtue of the sway they/it has over the community, is able to drastically reduce the transaction costs of enforcing an institutional arrangement that would neither work in their absence nor survive them.Successful NGOs similarly create islands of excellence by reducing transaction costs artificially and temporarily. The Sukhomajri experiment with watershed institutions in Haryana in the mid-1980s -Vilas Rao Salunke's pani panchayats in Maharashtra, Aga Khan Rural Support Programme's irrigators' association in Raj Samadhiala, Dhan Foundation's Tank User Federations, Development Support Centre's WUAs in Dharoi command in North Gujarat, community-managed tube wells that came up in Vaishali and Deoria in Eastern UP, Anna Hazare's Ralegaon Shiddi, Rajendra Singh's profusion of johads in Thanagazi, Alwar district, Chaitanya's conversion of irrigation tanks into percolation tanks in Rayalaseema -all these are examples. That the transaction cost reduction in all these was artificial is indicated by the absence of spontaneous lateral expansion/replication of these experiments despite the high pay-offs they are seen to have produced. That it was temporary is evident in that many of these institutions disappeared, stagnated or declined once the 'transaction cost reducer' was removed from the scene, as in Sukhomajri, Salunke's pani panchayats and others.A more important source of ideas -than the NGO-inspired islands of excellence -about what institutional change should occur and can sustain are the swayambhoo institutions that have already emerged and are thriving, as we explored earlier in the section under Vibrant Institutional Arrangements Ignored (Quadrant 1). These have found ways of reducing transaction costs in ways that are more natural, enduring and upscalable. This is evident in that these institutions multiply on their own, and are able to sustain and grow as long as they serve purposes important to the participants in the transactions. In my understanding, these offer six useful lessons (given under the following six headings) about how to make institutional change work in the Indian water sector.The first, and most obvious, is that institutional change which multiplies and sustains is invariably an instrument of the exchange of participants, and not of the players in the IE who often design institutional interventions. 'Opportunism with guile' is the driving force, even when high ideals and social goals are laboriously espoused as raison d'être. Trite as it may sound, design of incentive structures is amongst the most commonly ignored aspects in most institutional development programmes. Ideas like community-based groundwater demand management propose organizing cooperatives whose sole task would be to persuade their members to reduce their farming and incomes. Similarly, programmes to revive traditional community management of tanks commonly overlook the performance-based rewards offered to neerkattis (tank water distributors appointed by command area farmers) and focus primarily on generating voluntary contributions of time and effort for the greater good of the community. For institutional change to work it must serve a private purpose important to agents involved; otherwise, they will withhold participation or even work to defeat it.Institutions fail to emerge to take advantage of high-pay-off situations often because incentives are diffuse or even perverse, but the transaction costs of implementing change are concentrated in one or a few persons. In fishermen's cooperatives I discussed earlier, members faced perverse incentives: the cooperative stocked the pond but members stole the catch. The secretary had no incentive to make enemies by stopping poachers. When incentives became concentrated in the contractor as the residual claimant, he was willing to control poaching and invest in higher productivity. Gujarat's public tube wells had no takers until the opportunity arose for incentive concentration. That only a fraction of the surplus created by management improvement needs to be concentrated in the manager as a reward was shown 40 years ago by Amartya Sen (1966). In traditional tank institutions in South India, only a portion of the surplus output was offered to the neerkatti, who absorbed the bulk of the transaction cost of orderly distribution of tank water.This principle is at the heart of irrigation reforms in China. Except where traditional PIM/IMT is supported by a donor loan, China's strategy of making canal irrigation productive and viable consists of changing the incentive structure facing the 'ditch manager' (Shah et al., 2004a;Wang et al., 2005). A pre-specified volume of water is released into a reservoir and is charged for at a certain volumetric rate. The reservoir manager's remuneration includes a fixed component and a variable component, the latter increasing with the area irrigated from the same total volume of water. Like the Chinese village electrician who is able to perform a high transaction-cost role for a fairly modest reward, the ditch manager too is able to improve water productivity for a modest bonus, if recent studies are any guide (Shah et al., 2004a).Experimenting with the Indian equivalents of Chinese village electricians and ditch managers would be an interesting study. From the transaction cost viewpoint, however, there are two key differences between the Chinese and South Asian villages: first, the Chinese in general, thanks perhaps to the Confucian ethics, are more respectful to State authority compared with South Asians. Secondly, and more importantly, the village committees and the village party leader in a Chinese village enjoy far greater power and authority in the village society compared with India's gram panchayats and sarpanch. This has great implications for transaction costs. North (1990) suggests that: ' … institutional setting depends on the effectiveness of enforcement. Enforcement is carried out by first party (self-imposed codes of conduct), by second party (retaliation), and/or by a third party (societal sanctions or coercive enforcement by state).' Transaction costs facing an institutional change are determined by the ease of enforcement. A Chinese village electrician or ditch manager backed by the village committee and party leader can enforce the new rules by both retaliation and recourse to coercion through the party leader.In India, by contrast, Orissa's model of franchisees for rural billing and collection of electricity bills has attracted many entrepreneurs whose core competence is represented by their muscle power (Panda, 2002), because they have no effective local authority to either discipline them or to which they can turn to in order to defend their rights. For the same reasons, a typical culture fishery contractor has recourse only to retaliation to enforce his property right against a poacher. The high transaction cost of second-party enforcement of rules is perhaps the prime reason why entrepreneurs fail to come forward to make a business out of operating a canal or tank irrigation system.Catalysing effective local IAs is then a matter not only of designing appropriate incentive structures that entice entrepreneurs to undertake activities with a high pay-off but also of putting into place community sanction or authority structures that: (i) enforce his/her right to do so; and (ii) establish the boundaries within which he or she operates.Here is where a community organization has a role in providing legitimacy or sanction and boundary to a service provider, thereby reducing his/her transaction cost of self-enforcement of rules. It is difficult to overemphasize this point, which is commonly overlooked in programmes of creating participatory institutions. In the muchacclaimed traditional tank management institutions, all tank management was carried out not by the community but by the neerkatti, who had the sanction and legitimacy given by the community and a reward for services that was linked to the benefits they produced for the community. A self-appointed neerkatti would find it impossible to enforce rules of water distribution amongst ayacut (command area) farmers.A recent study of neerkattis by the Dhan Foundation shows that, for various reasons, many tank communities have begun withholding their sanction and questioning the legitimacy of the role neerkattis have played for centuries; as a result, the institution of neerkattis has begun to decline (Seenivasan, 2003). However, in those few tanks where we find traditional community management still working, it becomes evident that it worked through a clear specification of the 'governance' role of the community organization and the community-sanctioned, well-defined 'management' role of the neerkatti, a service provider whose rewards were linked to his performance. 31 The value of this lesson for improving the quality of 'social engineering' is evident in the Gujarat government's public tube well transfer programme; after getting nowhere for a decade, it suddenly took off the moment entrepreneurial service providers were offered concentrated incentives coupled with some legitimacy and sanction for undertaking service provision. On these counts, I predict that such service providers have failed to come forward to provide improved water distribution in surface irrigation projects because neither concentrated incentives nor legitimacy and sanction are on offer for local entrepreneurs who would contemplate taking up such roles. Equally, the entrepreneurial service provider model toosuch as the culture fishery contractor -operating without the sanction, legitimacy and boundary provided by a community organization is bound to be fragile.Finally, the IE can have a profound impact on what kind of IAs are promoted or discouraged, and what welfare and productivity impacts these produce (Mansuri and Rao, 2004); however, they do not have such impact because often they neither understand their working nor how to influence it. Informal pump irrigation markets, the fishing contractor and a decentralized groundwater recharge movement 32 are spontaneous and seemingly autonomous; but each of these is amenable to strong positive or negative influence from the IE.Gujarat's cottage RO industry fell in a single swoop of the Bureau of Indian Standards; and the working of pump irrigation markets can change overnight if policies related to electricity pricing and supply to the farm sector were to change (Shah et al., 2004c). Gujarat's Public Tube Well Transfer programme ploughed along without success for a decade and then suddenly took off because an actor in the IE changed the key rules of the game. And the culture fishery contractor faced drastic reduction in his transaction costs of doing business when the leasing policy for water bodies was changed at the instance of some actor in the IE. How well actors in the IE understand extant and potential institutions, their net welfare and productivity impacts and their backward and forward linkages determines how much they can influence or manage them.According to North (1990), institutional change is inherently incremental and path-dependent. It invariably grows out of its context; transposing institutional models that have worked in other, different contexts therefore seldom works in catalysing institutional change. India's state governments would probably have found it easier to manage metered electricity supply to farmers had they stayed engaged with the problems of metering rather than abandoning it the 1970s. Now that they face a huge groundwater economy based on the 'path' of flat tariff, their here-and-now options for change are tied to this path. The notion of 'path-dependence' has particular relevance to popular institutional notions, such as the Integrated River Basin Management, which have worked in highly formalized water economies in recent years. It is doubtful whether such models would work in the same way in the Indian situation, simply because by far the bulk of the Indian water economy is informal and outside the direct ambit of the IE.A reader who comes to this stage of this chapter will surely remark, as did John Briscoe, World Bank's Asia Water Advisor: 'But I find very little in the chapter that would help me if I am a Secretary for Water in Gujarat, or in the Government of India, for that matter …' This response is entirely understandable; however, on the contrary, this analysis does offer useful advice for action that should always focus on the 'art of the possible'. Allan (2001) has wisely suggested that: 'The mark of effective research, advice and policy making is the capacity of those involved to know the difference between what \"should\" be done, and what \"can\" be done. This can be expressed in another way as awareness of \"when\" what \"should\" be done, \"will be able\" to be done'.The upshot of this chapter is that all the things that a Secretary of Water Resources at the state or federal level is enjoined to do by the current discourse to promote improved demand management -imposing price on water resources (rather than water service), enforcing a groundwater law, making water the property of the state and stopping unlawful diversion from nature, instituting water withdrawal permits and assigning water entitlements, managing water at river basin levelwould be well nigh impossible to implement on any meaningful scale in a predominantly informal water economy such as that of India. Instead, governments of low-income countries should focus their effort on areas where they can produce significant impacts, which in my view are four (given under the following four headings):This already is a high priority and will remain so for a long time, even as opinion in the rich world is turning against investments in certain kinds of water infrastructure such as irrigation projects. There are several issues to be addressed such as mobilizing capital, improving the coverage of user households -especially from poorer classes, cost recovery, and so on. The point of attack, however, is the performance of public systems, which has tended to be abysmally low, be it irrigation systems or water supply and sanitation systems.Public systems' performance often responds strongly to demand for better performance not from users but from administrative or political leadership; however, such performance gains are transient, and become dissipated when demand slackens. To achieve sustainable performance improvements, institutional innovations are needed that restructure incentives and reduce transaction costs.In its enthusiasm for direct management of water demand -through pricing, rights and entitlements, laws and regulations -the current discourse is overlooking numerous opportunities to achieve comparable aims using indirect instruments. True, the Secretary of Water can do little to manage water demand directly. However, in the particular situation of India, the Secretary of Energy controlling the State Electricity Board can do a great deal for groundwater demand management, through pricing and rationing of electricity to tube wells.Finally, pricing and full cost recovery, tight water law and regulations, and water rights and entitlements are definitely indicated in the predominantly formal segments of the water economy. These are to be found in cities, excluding the slums and shanty towns; and in the industrial sector where users are large and easily identifiable. It will probably take Delhi and Mumbai years before they can establish a water supply and sanitation system that can match those of Abidjan or Tunis. However, given increasing political support for management reforms, India's cities -especially, high net-worth cities like Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore -offer by far the most fertile ground for water IE and urban governance systems for the introduction of global best practices in urban water supply and sanitation systems. In summary, then, how formal a country's water economy is determines what kind of policy and institutional interventions are appropriate to it. In a predominantly informal water economy, where self-supply is the rule and water diversion from nature is everybody's business, regulating the actions of all water diverters is extremely costly in terms of search, information, policing and enforcement costs. As a water economy formalizes, self-supply declines and a few, visible, formal entities specialize in diverting, processing and distributing water to users; in such an economy, the range of things public policy makers can do to improve water demand management becomes much larger. The pace of formalization of a water economy is a natural response to overall economic growth and transformation of a society. This pace can be forced to a limited degree by an authoritarian state or by investment in water infrastructure and services management. However, unless this process keeps pace with what the market can bear, it will face sustainability problems.The current global water policy discourse focusing on direct demand management is misleading in two ways for developing countries like India with a highly informal water economy: (i) it is enjoining it to institute policy and institutional reforms that are good in principle but present insurmountable implementation difficulties; and (ii) in contrast, it is deflecting attention away from things that need and can be done with a better understanding of the working of the water economy, warts and all.1 Formal and informal economies are a matter of elaborate study in institutional economics. Fiege (1990) summarizes a variety of notions of informality deployed by different researchers.According to Weeks (1975), cited in Fiege (1990, footnote 6): 'The distinction between a formal and informal sector is based on the organizational characteristics of exchange relationships and the position of economic activity vis-à-vis the State.Basically, the formal sector includes government activity itself and those enterprises in the private sector which are officially recognized, fostered, nurtured and regulated by the State. Operations in the informal sector are characterized by the absence of such benefits.' According to Portes et al. (1987, cited in Fiege, 1990, footnote 6): 'The informal sector can be defined as the sum total of income-generating activities outside the modern contractual relationships of production.' According to Portes andSaassen-Koo (1987, cited in Fiege, 1990, footnote 6), in the formal sector activities are 'not intrinsically illegal but in which production and exchange escape legal regulation'. To most researchers, an informal economy is marked by the 'absence of official regulation' or 'official status'. 2 In most countries, the proportion of water use in the informal sector would move in tandem with the proportion of water users. However, in countries marked by high levels of income inequalitysuch as South Africa or Brazil -this would not be the case. In South Africa, for instance, 95% of the water diversion and use are in the formal sector but over 99% of the users are in the informal sector.T. Shah North (1990) defines the transaction sector as:'that part of transactions that goes through the market and therefore can be measured' and, according to him, rapid growth in the transaction sector is at the heart of the transformation of a traditional economy into a modern one. 5 The survey estimated that approximately 36% of all rural households (which include farmers, farm labourers and households dependent on off-farm livelihoods) used some means of irrigation. Of these, 13.3% (i.e. 37% of irrigators) used their own source (well/tube well 11 A charismatic and energetic political or bureaucratic leader does often produce significant attitude and behaviour changes; however, these generally fail to last for long after the leader has been removed from the scene. In this sense, such change is not enduring. 12 Because the law did not apply to anyone who diverted less than 1030 m 3 of water/year. 13 Anil Shah, an illustrious former bureaucrat of the Government of Gujarat, fondly tells the story about Gujarat's groundwater bill, which was passed by the assembly in 1973. When the Chief Minister was required to sign it into the government gazette, he refused to do so because it required that every irrigation well be registered. His curt response to Mr Shah was: 'Can you imagine that as soon as this bill becomes a law, every talati (village-level revenue official) will have one more means at his disposal to extract bribes from farmers?' This is the reason there are no takers for the draft Groundwater Bill that the Ministry of Water Resources of Government of India has been tossing around to states since 1970. 14 The Andhra Pradesh law tried harder to come to grips with rampant groundwater over-exploitation in Andhra Pradesh by emphasizing the registration of wells and drilling agencies and stipulating punitive measures for non-compliance. 15 The 1987 Water Policy to Saleth (2004, p. 29) is '… such a simple non-binding policy statement'. 16 Although the Network Reform Programme is a National Government programme, the government contributes only a part of the resources, the balance being contributed by the village committee. Just to give an example, Guantun village in Yanjin County of Henan got a grant of Y60,000 (US$1.00 = Y8.33) under this project for infrastructural rehabilitation. To match this, the village also contributed Y60,000; of this, 60% came from the funds from the village collective, while the remaining 40% was raised as farmer contributions by charging Y80 per person. All the power lines and other infrastructure were rehabilitated during recent years under this national programme. New meters were purchased by the township in bulk and installed in users' homes on a cost-recovery basis. A system of monitoring meters was installed too. 17 The village electrician's reward system encourages him/her to exert pressures to achieve greater efficiency by cutting line losses. In Dong Wang Nnu village in Ci County, Hebei Province, the village committee's single large transformer that served both domestic and agricultural connections caused heavy line losses, at 22-25%. Once the Network Reform Programme began, he pressurized the village committee to sell the old transformer to the county electricity bureau and raise Y10,000 (partly by collecting a levy of Y25 per family and partly by a contribution from the village development fund) to acquire two new transformers, one for domestic connections and the other for pumps. Since then, power losses here have fallen to the permissible 12%. 18 Saleth (2004, p. 30) Mansuri and Rao (2004) have reviewed a much larger body of evidence from several sectors to assess the extent to which community-based and community-driven development projects for poverty alleviation were effective, and have concluded that: (i) these have not been particularly successful in targeting the poor; (ii) there is no evidence to suggest that participatory elements and processes lead to improved project outcomes and qualities; (iii) community-based development is not necessarily empowering in practice; and (iv) 'There is virtually no reliable evidence on community participation projects actually increasing a community's capacity for collective action' (p. 31). 22 Even in middle-income countries, huge inequalities in landholdings seem to have helped IMT. In the Andean region of Colombia where IMT has succeeded, according to Ramirez and Vargas (1999), farmers 'mostly grow crops oriented to the external markets, mainly banana and oil palm'; and while 66% of the farms have 5 ha or less, 40.3% of the land is owned by 2.8% of large farmers owning 50 ha or more. In South Africa, numerous Irrigation Boards -WUAs par excellencehave managed irrigation systems successfully for a long time; but their members are all large, white commercial farmers operating highly successful citrus and wine orchards. In Turkey, 40% of the irrigated area was in 5-20 ha holdings with a strong focus on high-value commercial crops for export to Europe. Here in Turkey, it can be argued, IMT has succeeded because, as with South African irrigation boards, in many respects there was already a 40-year old tradition of farmer participation in the maintenance of the canal system through an informal, village-level organization. Equally, irrigation fees under self-management in Turkey were 2% or less of the value of production per ha, 3.5% or less of total variable cost of cultivation and less than 6% of gross margin (Svendsen and Nott, 1997). 23 Sanskrit for self-creating or spontaneous. 24 A large survey, covering over 48,000 farming households throughout India during January-June 1998, suggested that over 66% of India's Gross Cropped Area under the five most important field crops (which account for over 90% of the Gross Cropped Area) is irrigated; only one-quarter of irrigated area is served by government canals. Amongst other interesting things it suggests that every fourth Indian farming household probably owns a diesel or electric pump; and the area irrigated through groundwater markets is as large as the area irrigated by all government canals (NSSO, 1999b). 25 As North (1990) aptly notes: 'If the highest rates of return in a society are to piracy, the organizations will invest in knowledge and skills that will make them better pirates; if the pay offs are … to increase productivity, they will invest in skills and knowledge to achieve that objective.' 26 An IWMI-Tata study (Indu, 2002, unpublished report) surveyed a sample of 14 such plants that served 4890 households. Reverse osmosis (RO) water in 10 and 20 l cans is delivered daily at the customer's door step; charges are levied on an annual basis (Rs 1500 (US$33) for a 10 l can daily; Rs 2500 (US$55) for a 20 l can). Plant capacities vary from 500 to 2000 l/h. In addition, most plants also retail RO water in pouches at bus stops, railway stations and crossings and market places. Consumers of pouches are typically lowincome buyers; retailers are also poor youth working on commission. In sum, this institution serves a demand by transforming 800-2000 ppm TDS water into 150-300 ppm TDS water, and fluoride levels reduced to 0.25-0.50 mg/l. People had no way of ascertaining the quality, but 60 customers surveyed by Indu (2004, unpublished report) asserted that the taste of RO water was distinct. Many also claimed relief from the pain of skeletal fluorosis after adopting RO water. 27 The seal of the Indian Standards Institution (ISI), the national agency for quality control in all manufactured products.28 Registering a cooperative itself meant a great hassle and cost in time and money. The policy also required that two-thirds of the command area farmers submit a written no-objection declaration for the transfer; past defaulters on water fees must first pay up their dues. In addition, several conditions specified that the violation of any of those would qualify the government to reclaim the tube well. 29 Transformation cost would include the cost of labour and material in creating a lined sub-minor and field channels plus the cost of acquiring land.Transaction cost would basically involve persuading farmers to give up their land for making channels and to give right of way to carrying water to downstream farmers. 30 In the North Krishna basin in western Maharashtra, a similar groundswell of numerous private irrigation service providers has created an institutional dynamic that challenges orthodox notions of how irrigation systems should be designed. The Bachawat tribunal's decision on the division of Krishna water between Maharashtra and Karnataka made Maharashtra's share contingent upon the amount of water it could develop and use by 2006.To maximize its share, the Government of Maharashtra went on a reservoir-building spree.Strapped of funds, it chose not to build canal systems; instead, it encouraged private entrepreneurs to set up numerous lift irrigation systems.In the command of one such small reservoir, Padhiari (2005) found 1200 such private irrigation service providers serving an area larger than was originally designed to be commanded. These entrepreneurs resolved most key problems that canal irrigation faces in India: while most canal projects are unable to collect even 3-5% of the gross value of crop output they help farmers produce, private service providers in the Upper Krishna basin regularly collect 25% as irrigation charge. All in all, in the smooth management of the tank, the neerkatti plays the pivotal management role; he is the operating system of the institution; the CoE, mostly invisible and unobtrusive, vests in him the authority and sanction to play that role on behalf of all the members. A tank management institution without a CoE or the neerkatti would be a far lesser institution. 32 In the Vadodara district, several leases given to fishing contractors were withdrawn because the communities rejected the contractors. In one case, for instance, the contractor used dead animals as manure, a practice that offended the community. In another, the chemical fertilizers used by the contractor ended up in a drinking water well within the tank foreshore; when this was discovered, the village refused to renew the lease. Such aberrations would not occur if the contractor had to obtain the legitimacy and sanction of the community to operate.T. Shah"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1293620674.json b/main/part_2/1293620674.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32783384add8ce0a6bcc9577859059d6d8a2de9b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1293620674.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"46a3006114bb981a1f79dd8c6444bd02","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/48653bef-c4d8-4c11-8f31-a95ead75991e/content","id":"-2026414769"},"keywords":["Comparative analysis","characterization","livelihoods","drought","production systems","varietal use","seed use AGRIS category codes: F01 Crop-husbandry","F02 Plant-propagation","F08 Croppingpatterns-and-systems","E10 Agricultural-economics-andpolicies","E15 Farm-organization-and-management","U40 Surveying-methods Dewey decimal classif.: 338.16676 ISBN: 978-970-648-183-2"],"sieverID":"326153b4-961f-4d14-8901-d16c1886e5a8","content":"Headquartered in Mexico, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (known by its Spanish acronym, CIMMYT) is a not-for-profit agriculture research and training organization. The Center works to reduce poverty and hunger by sustainably increasing the productivity of maize and wheat in the developing world. CIMMYT maintains the world's largest maize and wheat seed bank and is best known for initiating the Green Revolution, which saved millions of lives across Asia and for which CIMMYT's Dr. Norman Borlaug was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. CIMMYT is a member of the CGIAR Consortium and receives support from national governments, foundations, development banks, and other public and private agencies.The Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) project is jointly implemented by CIMMYT and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). It's funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Howard G. Buffett Foundation. The project is part of a broad partnership also involving national agricultural research and extension systems, seed companies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community-based organizations (CBOs), and advanced research institutes, together known as the DTMA Initiative. Its activities build on longer-term support by other donors, including the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), and the Eiselen Foundation. The project aims to develop and disseminate drought tolerant, high-yielding, locally-adapted maize varieties and to reach 30-40 million people in sub-Saharan Africa with these varieties in 10 years.The CIMMYT Socioeconomics Program (SEP) Working Papers series contain preliminary material and research results from CIMMYT social scientists and its partners. The papers are subject to an internal peer review. They are circulated in order to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of their home institutions or supporting organizations. For more information on this series contact the CIMMYT website. CIMMYT 2012. All rights reserved. The designations employed in the presentation of materials in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of CIMMYT or its contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s), and are not necessarily those of CIMMYT or our partners. CIMMYT encourages fair use of this material. Proper citation is requested.Selected characteristics of the study countries in eastern Africa. ........................ Table 2.Selected characteristics of the study areas in eastern Africa. ............................... Table 3.Sample characteristics in the drought prone study areas of eastern Africa. ......... Maize is the most important cereal food crop in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), particularly in eastern and southern Africa where it accounts for 53% of the total cereal area (FAO, 2010) and 30-70% of total caloric consumption (Langyintuo et al., 2010). Maize production in SSA is typically rainfed and drought prone. Drought has an overwhelming importance to SSA, affecting people's livelihoods, food security and economic development. CIMMYT (1990) initially estimated that some 40% of the maize area in SSA experience occasional drought (defined as causing yield losses of 10-25%) and 25% experience frequent drought (defined as causing yield losses of 25-50%). Frequent drought is particularly problematic for tropical and subtropical maize in SSA, and causes a 33% further maize yield reduction compared to less stressed areas (Heisey and Edmeades, 1999). Effective approaches to combat current impacts of drought are of utmost importance, more so as the situation is set to become even worse as climate change progresses (Cooper et al., 2008;Jones and Thornton, 2003;Thornton et al., 2009;Thornton et al., 2008).When recurrent droughts in SSA ruin harvests, lives and livelihoods are threatened, even destroyed.Developing, distributing and cultivating drought tolerant maize varieties in SSA is one highly relevant intervention to reduce vulnerability, food insecurity and damage to local markets due to food aid. But to succeed it needs to be embedded in local reality. Unfortunately for much of SSA basic descriptive statistics and data on farm livelihoods and practices that would inform such an intervention are not available. It is for this reason that rapid community assessments and detailed household surveys were conducted in drought prone areas of eastern Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania) to characterize the maize producing households.The original country level studies provide detailed descriptive accounts of the household survey findings (Legese et al., 2010;Mugisha et al., 2011;Muhammad et al., 2010;Temu et al., 2011). The present report synthesizes the findings of these four parallel household surveys in drought prone regions of eastern Africa. This synthesis thereby revisits and reanalyzes the original primary data and focuses on the sub-regional contrasts, similarities and implications. The present study is complemented by similar synthesis of parallel household surveys in southern Africa (Zambia, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Angola, and Mozambique) and western Africa (Nigeria, Ghana, Benin and Mali).The present report is organized into six chapters. The second chapter presents the drought prone study areas of eastern Africa and the methodology. The third chapter characterizes the households based on their livelihood assets whereas the fourth chapter characterizes the household livelihood strategies. The fifth chapter presents the technology use in crop production, with an emphasis on maize and maize seed. The sixth chapter concludes.The four eastern Africa study countries-Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda and Tanzaniaencompass a total population of some 200 million living in an area of 2.9 million km 2 . At a country level, Ethiopia and Kenya have about average population densities, but Uganda is more densely populated and Tanzania least (Table 1). Only 12% of the area is considered arable (0.34 million km 2 ), although this share is about double in Uganda. In Kenya, agriculture contributes a quarter of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) compared to over a third in the other countries. There is still widespread poverty, particularly in rural areas, although indicators vary as to the depth of poverty (Table 1). Maize is an important crop in the region, annually planted on 7.3 million ha (corresponding to 21% of the arable area and 41% of land under cereals). However, there are some marked regional variations in relative maize area (Table 1), being highest in Kenya and lowest in Ethiopia where maize comes second after teff (Eragrostis tef). Ethiopia has also quite diverse and substantial areas under sorghum, wheat and barley. Regional maize yields average only 1.6 tons per ha (Table 1). The study focuses on the drought prone maize producing areas in these four eastern Africa countries. In each country, two maize growing districts were purposively selected from the medium drought risk zone, defined as having a 20-40% probability of failed season (Thornton et al., 2006). This indicator reflects the percentage of years in which an annual crop is expected to fail due to severe water stress based on simulated data using a weather generator and the estimated actual and potential evapo-transpiration and length of the growing period (Thornton et al., 2006).The selected study areas primarily fall in the dry-subtropical ecology (i.e. 900-1500 meters above sea level [masl] with < 1000 mm pa, CIMMYT, 1990) -Table 2. This dry subtropical ecology typically represents a substantial share of the maize area in the respective countries, although its share in the total production is typically more limited due to the incidence of drought and correspondingly lower productivity levels. The study areas are characterized primarily by small-scale mixed crop-livestock systems. Irrigation is largely absent, with maize being a major crop in the main rain season. In areas with bimodal rainfall, maize is also grown in the second rain season, albeit that the main season remains dominant in terms of maize area and production.The study areas in Ethiopia and Tanzania are centrally located and situated within or adjacent to the Rift Valley. In Kenya the study areas are in Eastern Kenya -east of the Rift Valley and Nairobi. In Uganda the study sites are located in the countries central-eastern parts, on opposite sides of Lake Kyoga, north of Kampala (Figure 1). With the exception of Uganda, the population densities in the study areas (Table 2) tend to be higher than for their respective countries (Table 1), reflecting that large swathes of the respective countries are even less favorable for agriculture. Note: 1 ATJK: Adami Tulu -Jido Kombolcha. In case of Kenya survey focused on a sub-district or constituency (name mentioned in brackets). In Tanzania Dodoma Rural district was divided in 2007 into 2 new districts -Bahi and Chamwino (http://en.wikipedia.org/), with the survey being implemented in the latter. Source: derived from country reports (Legese et al., 2010;Mugisha et al., 2011;Muhammad et al., 2010;Temu et al., 2011). Population density based on combined districts, except for Tanzania based on aggregate regional data (http://en.wikipedia.org/ accessed 26 Jan 2011). For Ethiopia rural population density for Adama was used. From the two selected drought prone maize producing districts, a multi-stage random sample of farm households was selected -with a number of random villages selected first (Annex 1) and from these, a number of random farmers. In the first batch of survey countries (Ethiopia and Kenya), the sample amounted to some 350 farm households with the survey being implemented mid-2007 (Table 3). The survey was subsequently extended to a second batch of survey countries (Uganda and Tanzania) with a sample size of some 150 farm households with the survey being implemented in mid-2008 (Table 3). The comprehensive questionnaire was basically the same across the four countries -albeit that some additional questions were added to the second batch of survey countries. 1 In each country, the survey was collected by dedicated enumerators during a single visit. The information collected reflects the respondents' responses, with no additional measurements from the surveyor side (except for global-positioning system coordinates where collected).The enumerators typically interviewed the household head (80% of cases), with on average 28% of respondents being female (Table 4). Ethiopia and Kenya however stand out: in Ethiopia female and non-household head respondents were virtually absent, whereas in Kenya these amounted to about half the respondents. Household heads are typically male.Having the non-household head as respondent was typically associated with the temporary non-availability of the household head (Table 4). The data was originally entered, analyzed and reported at the country level using a common data template and report outline (Legese et al., 2010;Mugisha et al., 2011;Muhammad et al., 2010;Temu et al., 2011). Since these are parallel studies, a synthesis based on the country reports alone is typically problematic (e.g. see Doss et al., 2003). For the purpose of this synthesis, the datasets were merged and standardized to allow for cross-site analysis. The data presented here may therefore differ somewhat from that reported in the original country studies in view of standardization of approach and data across the country studies.The data analysis presented here is primarily descriptive -substantiated by simple statistics to the extent possible. Variances were typically not equal over the countries. The analysis therefore uses the Welch statistic to test for the equality of group means (which is preferable to the F statistic when the assumption of equal variances does not hold); and Tamhane's T2 for a conservative pair-wise comparison test of means (based on a t test which is appropriate when the variances are unequal -SPSS 16). Principal component analysis is used to assess the households' resource endowments. Limited dependent variable models are used to analyze improved maize seed purchases.The present report aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of a substantive survey. As such, all relevant variables for the four countries have been summarized in the numerous tables. However, to keep the report to a manageable length, the text tends to only summarize the pertinent findings. The interested reader is referred to the respective tables or underlying country reports for further substantiation.To facilitate comparison, all monetary values have been converted to US dollars using the bank exchange rate for the survey year (http://www.oanda.com/currency/converter/ accessed October 2010). 2The original survey collected information on maize and other crops grown by the surveyed farm households. For the purpose of the present report and underlying analysis, the information on these other crops is typically categorized into either other cereals, legume crops, roots & tubers or other crops. Maize is categorized as local, improved openpollinated variety (OPV) and hybrid based on the actual maize varieties reported by the surveyed farmers. However not all farmers are fully conversant with such categorization and the analysis thereby typically uses the prevailing categorization within the surveyed communities. Even so, this categorization remains indicative, for instance, the local category may include some of the older recycled improved varieties. The use of improved OPVs or hybrids also does not necessarily imply the use of fresh seed, as recycling of both categories is common.It should be recalled that the surveys targeted the drought prone maize producing areas, and are limited to only two districts per country. The study results are thus not representative for the country as a whole, but were intended to be representative for the target area. Care should thus be taken when interpreting references to specific countries in the tables or text, with most instances unless otherwise specified, referring to the drought prone study areas and not to the country as a whole. Furthermore, the present synthesis aggregates the two study districts per country. Within country differences are explored in the respective country reports.In the pursuit of their livelihood strategies, farm households in the drought prone areas of eastern Africa draw on a portfolio of assets. The present chapter characterizes the livelihoods assets of the farm households namely, human, natural, physical, financial and social capital. The chapter ends with a principal component analysis of the household asset base.The size of the surveyed rural households averages seven people, of which only half can be considered as economically active (i.e. being aged between 16-60 years) and the remainder primarily being children (i.e. less than 16 years old -Table 5). Households are typically male headed (90%) with households' head being married (87%), 46 years old and having completed only primary education (Table 5; Table 6).The surveyed rural households are typically small-scale family farms, drawing on the family as their main labor source. Each household comprises an average of 4.3 adult equivalents, which implies 3.3 adult equivalents per ha of farm land and 0.6 adult units per capita. An annual average of 51 months of family labor (including children) is reportedly dedicated to the family farm. The household head is the main decision maker for farming activitieseither solely (68%) or in consultation with other (27% -Table 5). Households are thereby somewhat constrained by the relatively limited educational level of the household headwith the household's educational status only being marginally better (i.e. when considering the highest educational status across household members), with an average of only 5 years of schooling per capita (Table 6).The sample averages mask some substantial variations between the countries surveyed (Table 5; Table 6). For instance, household size in the study areas was substantially higher in Uganda and Ethiopia (8) and lowest in Tanzania (5), the latter also having the highest incidence of female headed households (18%). The Kenya study area combined relatively aged households (as illustrated by average household age; limited share of children; oldest household heads) with the most decentralized decision making with respect to farming; whereas the Ethiopia study area combined relatively young households, male dominance and relative low educational attainment levels of particularly the household head. Land and livestock are the main natural assets of the farm households, averaging 3 ha of land and 2.6 tropical livestock units, equivalent to about half a unit of each per capita. Land is primarily used for the cultivation of annual crops (2.1 ha), with only 0.2 ha under perennial crops and 0.6 ha under pasture/fallow (Table 7). These averages again mask substantial regional variation. The drought prone study areas in Kenya combine relatively small farms with a modest livestock herd -although this still implies relatively high livestock densities per unit farm area (Table 7). Farm and herd size was the largest in the Uganda study areas, but included a substantial area under fallow/pasture. Perennial crops were primarily limited to the Uganda study areas, linked inter alia to the more favorable rainfall regime (amount and bimodal distribution). Indeed, perennial crops were virtually absent in the study areas of Ethiopia and Tanzania with their limited and mono-modal rainfall. The rural households in these drought prone study areas are relatively poor, and the physical assets correspondingly limited (Table 8). Indeed, despite the importance of farming for their livelihoods (see next chapter) and the incidence of drought, investments in irrigation have been limited, and largely restricted to Kenya and small-scale vegetable cultivation. Only about half of the households have been able to upgrade their lodging in terms of having improved walls or roofs, although both of these are common place in the Kenya study areas (Table 8).Households were queried with respect to possession of specific physical asset types. On average about two assets were reported per household, although varying from less than one in Tanzania study areas to nearly three in Uganda (Table 8). The most common asset types are radio (64% overall, particularly common in Uganda and Kenya), draft animals (42% overall, particularly common in Ethiopia) and bicycles (40% overall, particularly common in Uganda). Mobile phones were owned by 22% of the surveyed farm households, but primarily concentrated in Kenya and Uganda (nearly 40%) and relatively absent in Ethiopia and Tanzania (5-7%, Table 8). The scarcity of funds reiterates the relative poverty of the rural households in these drought prone study areas (Table 9). The use of credit can help alleviate fund shortages, but was reported by only 15% of households, primarily for production purposes and for fertilizer. Credit use was primarily limited to the study areas in Ethiopia (28% of households reporting) and Uganda (21%). The non-use of credit was mainly linked to unavailability in the vicinity (39%) or lack of collateral (19%), whereas 31% reported not having sought credit (Table 9).The relatively limited use of credit implies a limited sample size for various specific credit indicators. The credit-using households reported a variety of credit sources, but government programs were relatively important in Ethiopia. Repayments are mainly done in cash. The reported credit amounts (for those receiving) were relatively limited, be it production credit (average US$ 176, n=79), input credit (fertilizer 128 kg, n=49; maize seed 42 kg, n=24) or consumption credit (US$ 273, n=11). Social capital provides households with important additional social entitlements that are however problematic to measure empirically. The questionnaire did include a number of institutional support indicators that can be used as a proxy (Table 10). About two-fifths of the surveyed farm households were members of a farmers' association/cooperative, although this was markedly more common in Ethiopia (associated with access to inputs) and relatively uncommon in Tanzania. About a third of the surveyed farm households reported having received some aid/relief, mainly in the form of food relief or seed relief. Some 28% attended selected agricultural extension activities (i.e. field days, field demonstrations and/or maize discussions), such activities mainly being organized by agricultural extension services. About half the surveyed farm households reported the extension service as a frequent source of agricultural information, with 19% reporting mass media (i.e. radio, newspaper, television) and 34% other sources, including other farmers (e.g. reported by 35% of households in Kenya). Interestingly, the extension service was near universally reported as information source in Ethiopia compared to less than a fifth in Kenya. About half of the surveyed farm households in Ethiopia and Uganda reported any interaction with extension agents during the survey year against a quarter to a third elsewhere. Overall, surveyed farm households in Tanzania reported limited institutional support in terms of relief or extension, particularly compared to Uganda (Table 10). The foregoing sections show that the surveyed farm households present different endowments in terms of the various livelihood assets. An asset based wealth index can be used to create a single cross-cutting indicator of the household's endowments. One way of creating such an index is the use of principal component analysis (PCA), which has been variously used to create wealth indices (Erenstein, 2011;Filmer and Pritchett, 2001;Langyintuo and Mungoma, 2008).PCA is a popular data reduction tool. It has however two limitations for the construction of wealth/asset indices (Howe et al., 2008). Discrete data are particularly problematic, and thereby inherently limit the choice of asset variables available for inclusion in the PCA. PCA wealth/asset indices also tend to use only the first principal component which actually explains only a low proportion of the total variation in the asset data. In the current study we thereby exclude discrete asset data and also present all principal components having an eigen value larger than 1.The PCA was applied to a set of eight non-discrete variables spanning the range of asset categories for the surveyed farm households both for the combined study areas (Table 11) and for each of the country specific study areas (Table 12). The number of principal components is two for the combined application (explaining 41% of variance) and threefour in the country specific applications (explaining 50-62%). The first principal component (PC) alone typically explains 21% to 33% of variance, but tends to be variously associated to the underlying assets. At the country level, the first PC is mainly associated with herd size (Ethiopia, Uganda and Tanzania), physical assets (Ethiopia, Uganda and Kenya), farm size (Ethiopia and Uganda), family labor (measured as adult equivalent units, Ethiopia and Uganda) and schooling (Kenya and Tanzania).Based on the first PC alone and using zero as a cut-off point, some two-fifths of the households would be classified as well-endowed and the remainder as less-endowed in each study area. 3 At the regional level the first PC is most closely associated with herd size and physical assets. As a result, more than two-thirds of Ugandan surveyed farm households would be classified as relatively well-endowed based on the first regional PC alone, whereas Tanzanian households would be primarily classified as less-endowed. 4 The ease of interpretation of the PCs' could be enhanced by rotation, but this would reduce the explanatory power of the first PC. The surveyed farm households in the drought prone areas of eastern Africa variously use their portfolio of assets reviewed in the previous chapter as building blocks for their livelihood strategies. The present chapter characterizes the livelihoods strategies pursued by the farm households, particularly in terms of crop production, livestock production and offfarm income. It subsequently provides profiles of reported household cash income and expenditures and summarizes the households' profitability and risk perceptions. The chapter ends with the outlook and implications for the farm households' livelihoods.Overall, annual crops average 83% of the farm area (Table 13). Fallow/pasture was reported by 36% of the households and occupying 13% of the farm area overall, albeit being more common in the Uganda and Tanzania study areas where the average farm size is relatively large. Perennial crops are relatively uncommon in the drought-prone study areas, reported by about a fifth of the households and occupying 4% of the farm area overall, and markedly concentrated in the Kenya and Uganda study areas (e.g. coffee:, 20% of households Kenya and13% in Uganda)The study was targeted at maize growing drought prone districts in eastern Africa. The survey confirms the importance of maize in the study area, with maize cultivation nearuniversal and the maize area averaging 1 ha per household corresponding to some two-fifths of the farm area (Table 13). Maize thereby occupies about half the annually cropped area. In Kenya, maize intercropping prevails and intercrops include legumes, other cereals and roots and tubers.Across the study areas, 75% of the surveyed farm households grow at least one legume, which account for 19% of the farm area. Legumes include:-Beans (61% of households overall, albeit variously reported -Kenya 93%, Ethiopia 69%, Uganda 23% and Tanzania4%);-Groundnut (17% of households overall, Uganda 77% and Tanzania 36%); -Cowpea (10% of households overall, Kenya 25%, Uganda 7%); and -Pigeon pea (Kenya 47%).About a third of the surveyed farm households reported other cereals and a similar share of roots and tubers, which respectively accounted for 11% and 8% of the farm area. Other cereals include:-Sorghum (9% of households overall, Uganda 29%, Tanzania 24%); -Millet (9% of households overall, Uganda 37%, Tanzania 17%); -Rice (2% of households overall, Tanzania 11%),-Teff (Ethiopia only, 55%); -Wheat (Ethiopia only, 3%). Roots and tubers include:-Sweet potato (26% of household overall, Uganda 71%, Ethiopia 36%); -Cassava (5% of households overall, kenya11%; Uganda 3%); and -Yam (UG 91%). Only 14% of households reported other annual crops accounting for 3% of the farm area, including vegetables (Kenya 12%; Uganda 4%), sunflower (Tanzania 28%), sesame (Tanzania 13%) and cotton (Uganda 12%). -Fallow/pasture 25 32 58 51 36 Notes: sd: standard deviation; n: sample size (=1019 unless otherwise indicated); all p's (Welch or Chi-square) highly significant (0.00). Data preceding different letters differ significantly -Tamhane's T2 (significance level: 0.10), within row comparison.The total cultivated area was determined by a combination of food needs, cash availability for inputs and seed availability (Table 14), with food needs being particularly common in Kenya and Tanzania. There was no clear trend in terms of the household's maize area in the study areas (Table 15). A constant maize area was primarily associated with a constant farm size, whereas rainfall was the prime determinant in case of maize area changes followed by resource availability indicators (Table 15). Maize production is primarily dual purpose in the study areas: to meet household food needs and sale of surplus. Maize consumption is thereby near universally reported by the surveyed farm households, with 58% (overall) reporting maize sales (Table 16). The relative volume of maize consumed (61% of produce, over the four sites) is about double the maize volume sold (31%) with the remainder (8%) either retained as seed, gifted or lost (Table 16). Only in the Uganda study areas is maize consumption more limited with the bulk of maize production being marketed (Table 16). Production of other cereals, legumes and roots and tubers are generally also dual purpose -reiterating that these are primarily small-scale family farms. Maize is primarily sold to traders. In the case of Uganda and Tanzania, maize tends to be sold at the time of harvest from the farmer's home. In Kenya, and particularly in Ethiopia, farmers tend to take their maize grain to the market. Marketing patterns for other cereals are largely similar (Table 17). Grain prices are primarily determined by the buying agent, although in Tanzania prices tended to follow the government set prices and in Kenya prices were influenced by the neighboring markets (Table 17). Livestock are an important component of the livelihood portfolio of the surveyed farm households, with over 90% of the surveyed households reporting some livestock. With the exception of Tanzania (with only a fifth reporting), three quarters of the surveyed farm households reported having cattle (Table 18). Cattle are primarily local, with an average herd size of 4.5 heads per household -with the largest average number in Ethiopia and Uganda. Reported ownership and numbers of small stock as a group (goats, sheep and pigs) are similar to cattle (Table 18). Goats are the main small stock in these drought prone areas, with pigs primarily limited to Uganda and sheep being relatively more common in Ethiopia. As a group poultry was the most commonly reported across the study areas -being reported by at least half the surveyed households in each area. Transport animals (like donkeys) were primarily only reported in Ethiopia, where they averaged one per farm household (Table 18).Livestock play a varied role in the livelihood portfolio of the surveyed farm householdsincluding the provision of food and income (and cash), asset accumulation, diversification/insurance and services (e.g. draft for tillage, particularly important in Ethiopia). Nearly half (45%) of the surveyed farm households reported having sold some livestock during the survey year, with 18% having acquired and 39% having consumed some of their livestock units during the same period. The reported herd value averaged US$ 750 per surveyed farm household (Table 18). The surveyed farm households further complement their livelihood portfolio with off-farm income sources. Some 82% of the surveyed farm households reportedly had some of their household members engaged in off-farm income generating activities. Such off-farm income sources were markedly more common (near universal) in Ethiopia and Kenya, where they involved more than half the household members and most commonly related to farm labor (Table 19). Petty trading was the next most common off-farm income source based on household member activities, and actually the most commonly reported source in Uganda and Tanzania whereas it was virtually absent in Ethiopia. An array of other off-farm income sources was reported based on household member activities, particularly in Kenya and Uganda, including some relatively skilled and non-agricultural endeavors (Table 19). The foregoing off-farm indicators are based on the off-farm activities as reported for individual household members aggregated to the household level. The reported sources of household cash income (see next section) however provide a somewhat different categorization. Based on these reported cash income sources, two-thirds of the surveyed farm households (overall) reported some sort of off-farm cash income, and half the households (overall) reported any labor related off-farm cash income -such as petty trading, paid employment or self employed. Off-farm cash income sources were nearly universally reported by the surveyed farm households in Kenya, against about half elsewhere (Table 19).This study sought to establish cash income sources and expenditures of the surveyed farm households during the survey year. The monetary responses should however be interpreted with the necessary caution in view of the sensitivity of the data and the survey being a single visit survey. It should also be recalled that this relates to cash only, whereas a substantial share of household income is in-kind, particularly the self-produced crops which are to a large extent consumed over the year by the household to meet daily food needs. Still, the results provide rough indicators of annual cash income and expenditures and their breakdown over categories (Table 20; Table 21).As a category, crop sales were most frequently reported as a cash income source by the surveyed farm households (79% of households overall), followed by other farm sources such as livestock sales (42%) and fruit and vegetable sales (23% -Table 20). Overall, 91% of the surveyed farm households reported some cash income from their farm, whereas 65% of households reported some cash income from off-farm sources. Various off-farm cash income sources were reported at relatively similar rates overall, including remittances (25%), petty trading (22%), paid employment (22%) and self employed (19% -Table 20). The Kenya study site shows a marked deviation from the other study areas, with crops being least commonly reported, whereas the incidence of the various off-farm sources is markedly higher (Table 20).Annual reported cash income averaged about US$900 per surveyed farm household, with a marked regional variation: being less than US$ 400 (i.e. less than half the regional average) in Ethiopia and Tanzania, and US$1200-1500 in Uganda and Kenya (Table 20). Overall, sales of crop products (including fruit and vegetables) accounted for nearly half the reported cash income (48%), followed at a distance by a portfolio of other sources, including livestock sales (12%) and paid employment (12% -Table 20). The contribution of crop products was least for the surveyed farm households in Kenya (24%), where paid employment provided a similar share and with a more even spread over the various other income sources -off-farm income sources thereby contributing 65% of annual cash income (Table 20). Overall, the farm contributed 61% to annual cash income with off-farm sources contributing the remaining 39% (Table 20). The surveyed farm households reported a range of expenditure categories, typically including clothing, fuel and medical expenses (Table 21). Although these are farm households, food expenditures were similarly widely reported. Annual reported cash expenditure averaged US$640 per surveyed farm household, with a marked regional variation similar to income (Table 21). Overall, food expenditure made up the largest expense category (37% overall, and about half in Kenya and Tanzania), despite these being farm households. This was followed by clothing (15%), education (13%), medical (9%) and array of smaller categories (Table 21). Overall a third of the surveyed farm households thereby was a net food buyer (i.e. reported expenditures on food exceed reported on-farm cash income), whereas this amounted to three-fifths in Kenya and Tanzania study areas (Table 21).Somewhat less (29%) of the surveyed farm households reportedly were cash deficient (i.e. reported expenditures exceed reported cash income), although this amounted to two-thirds in the Tanzania study areas (Table 21). To enhance our understanding of the current livelihood portfolio of the surveyed farm households, we sought their perceptions of relative profitability and risk. These perceptions are summarized below, whereas in the next section we review the outlook and implications for their livelihoods.Overall, surveyed farm households generally rated improved maize (open pollinated variety [OPV] or hybrid) as relatively profitable and roots and tubers as least profitable, with local maize, other cereals and legumes in-between. There are however some marked regional variations (Table 22) -typically associated with the underlying cropping pattern. Profitability of local maize was generally rated relatively medium, but scored favorably in Kenya where it is widely grown (see next chapter). In contrast, improved OPVs scored relatively high in Uganda and Tanzania and hybrids in Ethiopia and Kenya, again in line with their use. The profitability of other cereals scored relatively high in Ethiopia, associated with teff cultivation. Notes: sd: standard deviation; n: sample size; all ps ( * ANOVA, Welch or Chi-square) highly significant (0.00) unless otherwise indicated (ns: not significant). Data preceding different letters differ significantly -Tamhane's T2 (significance level: 0.10), within row comparison.Overall, the surveyed farm households generally perceived a positive profitability trend for the various crop types (Table 22). An exception was the profitability trend for local maize, which was generally perceived as static and even as declining in Ethiopia. Increasing production was reported as the main plan to enhance crop profitability, followed by growing profitable crops, with less than a quarter reporting diversification or cost reduction (Table 22).Surveyed farm households were presented with a number of crop production scenarios and asked how they would respond (Table 23). Crop area was relatively inelastic in face of unfavorable conditions-low produce price, low yield, fertilizer unavailability-with only about a third of the households intending to reduce area in response (Table 23). Crop area was more elastic in face of favorable conditions-high produce price, high yield, fertilizer availability, credit availability-with some two-thirds intending to increase area (Table 23). In part, these responses reflect the dual purpose nature of crop production (particularly the importance of home consumption) and the limited alternative income generating options available-whereby crop production will thus persist even under unfavorable conditions. The farm household's asset portfolio provides an important buffer against crop production and crop price risks. Farmers thereby reportedly tend to accumulate such assets when conditions are favorable-higher yields, higher crop prices-whereas they may have to sell some when conditions are dire-crop failure, low crop prices (Table 23). The dual purpose nature of crop production also explains the relative importance of the selling price for crop sales. Over half the surveyed farm households would also increase input and credit use in response to favorable crop prices (Table 23). There are some regional variations in the reported responses, particularly in terms of the magnitude, but overall the direction of responses is relatively similar across study sites (Table 23). Overall, surveyed farm households generally rated roots and tubers (particularly sweet potato) as less drought susceptible and legumes as most drought susceptible (Table 24).Local maize and improved OPVs were also rated as relatively susceptible, whereas hybrid maize rated at par with other cereals. Except for hybrid maize, there are again marked regional variations (Table 24). Yield risk was rated relatively similar to drought susceptibility, with roots and tubers rated as the least risky in terms of yield and legumes and local maize as relatively risky (Table 25). Agricultural diversification was the prevailing coping strategy for yield risk among the surveyed farm households (70% overall), followed by asset accumulation (27%) and nonagricultural diversification (21% -Table 25). Other farmers were the main information source on yield risk (63%) followed by extension (36%) and the mass media (16% -Table 25).Price risk was rated relatively high for maize (especially local and improved OPVs) and relatively low for roots and tubers (Table 26). Asset accumulation was the prevailing coping strategy for price risk among the surveyed farm households (74% overall) followed by participation in government/NGO programs (18% -Table 26). For price risk, other farmers were again the main information source (65%) followed by extension (22%) and the radio (18% -Table 26). Notes: n: sample size; all p's ( * ANOVA, Welch or Chi-square) highly significant (0.00) unless otherwise indicated (ns: not significant). Data preceding different letters differ significantly-Tamhane's T2 (significance level: 0.10), within row comparison.The study targeted the maize producing drought prone areas. It is therefore not surprising that the surveyed farm households nearly universally reported at least one crop failure due to drought during the last decade (>99% overall, with the lowest average being 96% Tanzania).The number of crop failures due to drought during the last decade averaged 3, with the lowest average being reported in Kenya and Tanzania (2.6-2.8) and the highest in Ethiopia and Uganda (3.3-3.7 -Table 27). What is more, the site selection thereby proved robust in each of the countries as the study targeted areas with a probability of failed season of 20-40%. Still, although the survey averages fell within the target range, individual responses oscillated widely (from 0 to 10). About half (46% overall) of the surveyed farm households had been compelled to sell off some assets during the survey year due to difficulties (i.e. for some reason or another, not necessarily due to drought), a fraction that was relatively similar across the study sites (Table 27). The need to buy food was the main reason (48% overall) for those that had to sell assets (Table 27).Somewhat more than half (58% overall) of the surveyed farm households considered themselves as food secure during the survey year (Table 27). The remaining 42% averaged four months without adequate food, a duration that was again relatively similar across the study sites (Table 27). The actual timing of food shortage varied, typically associated with the incidence of rains-e.g. falling during the main rains in the Ethiopia and Tanzania study sites. The surveyed farm households reported an array of food shortage coping mechanisms, the most frequent being reducing other expenditures (38% overall), working more off-farm (30%), selling small animals (27%) and selling cattle (24% -Table 27). Drought (71% overall) and food security issues (61%) also prevailed as the most widely reported threats to the livelihoods of the surveyed farm households (Table 28). Health issues were reported as a threat by half the households, followed by an array of other threats that include poverty (15%), pest and diseases (13%) and insecurity (10% -Table 28). Other weather related threats included erratic weather/rain/climate (including climate change, 6%), floods (4%) and excess rains (2%). Drought (17% overall) was also reported as a constraint to livelihood improvement by the surveyed farm households (Table 29). However, a number of other constraints were more widely reported, including health (36% overall), input issues (36%), market issues (32%) and agricultural productivity (23%). Other reported constraints partly associated with drought included erratic weather/rain/climate (11%) and crop failure/production risk (5%). The surveyed farm households were also requested to enlist the most serious shocks they had been affected by during the last decade (Table 30). As expected, these overlap in part with the reported threats to their livelihoods reported earlier (Table 28). Drought again prevailed as the most widely reported shock (89% overall), but this time followed by floods/excess rain (38%) and plant pests/diseases (34%). The health status and even death of the breadwinner/wife was another common shock (23% and 10% respectively). An array of other shocks was reported, including erratic rain (14%), price shocks (maize & input prices, 21% each), livestock shocks (death/loss and disease, 18% and 14% respectively) and damage to crops by animals (including wildlife) and birds (17% and 8% respectively -Table 30). Notes: n: sample size; all p's (Chi-square) highly significant (0.00), unless otherwise indicated (ns: not significant).Agriculture remains the pivot in the livelihood portfolio of farm households. Despite their location in drought prone areas, the large majority of the surveyed farm households (80% overall) thereby sought to increase agricultural production as their preferred strategy to enhance their livelihoods-with only a negligible few considering an exit from agriculture (Table 31). An array of complementary strategies was reported by the surveyed farm households with some regional variation, including increasing food security (50% overall, especially common in Tanzania), improving educational status (31%), increasing land ownership (26%) and improving health status (25% -Table 31). Notes: n: sample size; all p's (Chi-square) highly significant (0.00), unless otherwise indicated (ns: not significant).Crop and particularly maize production plays a pivotal role in the livelihoods of the surveyed farm households in the drought prone areas of eastern Africa as reviewed in the previous chapter. The present chapter characterizes maize production further with a particular emphasis on technology use in general and seed use in particular. The chapter ends with an analysis of the factors affecting improved maize seed purchases.Surveyed farm households enlisted 2.8 known maize varieties per household on average, including 1 local maize variety, 0.8 improved Open Pollinated Varieties (OPVs) and 1 hybrid (Table 32). This relatively even distribution across the three distinguished maize seed types however masks some marked regional variations. Particularly striking is the contrast between the surveyed households in Uganda and those in Kenya, with a marked contrast in terms of knowledge of OPVs and hybrids, in line with the prevailing seed availability in the respective countries. Knowledge of local varieties was relatively evenly distributed over the countries, although the surveyed households in Uganda also enlisted the most local varieties (Table 32).The surveyed farm households were asked about the perceived drought tolerance of the known varieties. Overall, the perceived tolerance was somewhat higher for known hybrids compared to known local maize varieties, with known OPVs in-between (Table 32). However, these perceptions again showed marked regional differences. Striking is that the perceived drought tolerance of known OPVs were rated highest in Uganda (particularly compared to known local there), but lowest in Ethiopia (Table 32). Surveyed farm households were queried as to what they perceived as the best known maize variety for local, improved OPV and hybrid (Table 33) and to make subsequent pair-wise contrasts for a number of attributes (Table 34). In line with expectations, (the best known) local maize was perceived to have the lowest seed price and lowest yield potential and (the best known) hybrid the highest on both accounts (Table 34). 5 The perceived seed availability showed a marked opposite trend; whereas cob and grain size showed similar contrasts as the yield potential. OPVs were markedly shorter duration than the two other types. OPVs were also reportedly better performing under low soil moisture, followed by hybrid and with local maize rated poorest. OPVs also performed better under low soil fertility, although hybrid and local swapped places, with hybrid now lowest, perhaps associated with the perceived need for chemical fertilizer. OPVs however ranked poorly in terms of the perceived resistance to pests and diseases, with hybrids being most prone to storage pests. Local maize was perceived to be particularly lodge prone. OPVs were also rated favorably in terms for various post harvest attributes, particularly poundability, thereby contributing to local maize having the lowest maize grain price (Table 34). Surveyed farm households were queried about the desired attributes of their ideal maize variety (Table 35). In line with expectations, yield potential was the most widely reported (69% overall). However next most common were early maturity (56%) and drought tolerance (43%), whereas performance under poor rainfall was reported by an additional 14%. Early maturity typically has a dual purpose-being associated with shortening the hungry season and being drought escaping. Drought thereby featured prominently, clearly associated with the study targeting drought prone areas. The factors determining maize varietal choice thereby were relatively similar, with yield potential being most prominent followed by maturity period and drought resistance (Table 36). Reasons for not using any of the maize varieties known to the households typically revolved around grain yield (particularly prominent for non-use of local maize varieties), expensive seed (particularly for non-use of hybrids) and non-availability of seed (most common for non-use of OPVs, although also reported by a fifth to a fourth for the non-use of the two other seed types -Table 37). Notes: multiple response for household for known specific maize varieties not used during survey year; n: sample size.The surveyed farm households planted some 35 kg of maize seed per year overall, although this oscillated around the 20 kg for Tanzania and about 50 for Ethiopia (Table 38). Although the surveyed farm households knew 2.8 maize varieties on average, they actually only used 1.3 varieties in the survey year-an average that was similar in the two preceding years and somewhat higher in Uganda and Kenya (Table 38). Except in Ethiopia, the portfolio of maize varieties used by the surveyed farm households typically featured two-three prominent varieties in each study area (Table 39). In the case of Uganda three improved Longe varieties were most prominent, being grown by at least a quarter of the households, whereas in Tanzania local varieties were most widely reported. Kenya presents an interesting contrast, with the portfolio being dominated by one popular local maize and a third of the households reporting one particular hybrid. In Ethiopia, the most popular variety was only grown by 16% of the surveyed households, with the top spot being shared between a local variety and a hybrid, followed by a range of other varieties (Table 39). -Improved OPVs 2.3 c 0.3 a 1.6 b 3.5 c 2.0 (±1.9, 363)-Hybrids 1.8 b 0.5 a 0.4 a 1.9 b 1.0 (±1.6, 271)-Any maize variety 3.0 b 1.6 a 3.6 bc 5.7 c 3.2 (±5.1, 717)Notes: sd: standard deviation; n: sample size; all ps (Welch, * ANOVA or Chi-square) highly significant (0.00) unless otherwise indicated (ns: not significant). Data preceding different letters differ significantly -Tamhane's T2 (significance level: 0.10), within row comparison.Overall, improved and local maize varieties were about equally common among the surveyed farm households-be it in terms of households reporting their use (respectively 62% and 59% overall) or their share in reported seed use (49% and 51% -Table 38). However, local varieties are particularly widespread in the Kenya and Tanzania study areas, being reported by about a third of the surveyed households in Ethiopia and Uganda (Table 38).Interestingly, the Kenya study thereby combines the highest use rate of local varieties with the highest penetration of hybrids (41% of households) and a relative absence of (improved) OPVs. In contrast, the use of OPVs is widespread in the Ethiopian and Ugandan study areas (Table 38).Farmers have been growing the maize varieties they use for an average of five years -this being somewhat shorter in the Ethiopian and Kenyan study areas (Table 38). In line with expectations, local varieties have the longest durations of use (9.4 years overall), followed by OPVs and hybrids (Table 38). On average, surveyed farmers reported recycling their maize varieties for 3.2 years -this duration again being longest for local varieties as expected (Table 38). However, even hybrids were reportedly recycled for an average of one year, a practice particularly common in the Ethiopian and Tanzanian study areas (Table 38). OPVs were reportedly recycled for an average of two years (Table 38). Recycling of maize seed is indeed commonplace-with 70% of surveyed households (overall) reportedly retaining some of their maize harvest as seed, amounting to 4% of the maize produced on average (see earlier Overall, 70% of the surveyed farm households reported having used improved maize varieties (OPVs or hybrids) during the five years preceding the survey, with about three quarters of users reporting continuous use (Table 40). Lack of money was the main reasons for those not using any improved varieties, followed by them being satisfied with existing varieties and not having heard/seen any better varieties (Table 40). Lack of money and satisfaction with existing varieties were also reported as the main reasons for not using improved varieties in the survey year (Table 40), whereas non-continuous use of improved varieties was primarily associated with non-satisfaction and again lack of money (Table 40). -Other 5 0 0 3 0 9Notes: n: sample size; all p's (Chi-square) highly significant (0.00) unless otherwise indicated (nr: not relevant [empty cells]).The surveyed farm households started using improved maize seed varieties relatively recently-on average some five years before the survey (2002-03 across study sites). The maize varieties that were first used by the surveyed farm households are listed in Table 41many of which were still in use during the survey year (Table 39). The households were queried as to their sources of improved variety seed and related information (Table 42). 6 The main information sources were fellow farmers and the public extension-reported about equally overall but with a marked regional variation. Public extension is strikingly prominent in Ethiopia and Tanzania whereas fellow farmers are much more prominent in the Kenya and Uganda study areas. Improved maize variety seed was primarily acquired through purchases, mainly from agro-dealers. In the Ethiopia and Tanzania study areas it was relatively more common for farmers to acquire seed through public channels. A quarter of the surveyed farm households used saved seed and 16% seed from another farmer. About half the surveyed households reported availability as the main reason for the choice of seed source. Notes: only for 716 households that used any improved variety during the 5 years preceding the survey. n: sample size [valid responses]; all p's (Chi-square) highly significant (0.00). Responses do not sum to 100% as multiple responses for household possible.About half (55% overall) of the surveyed farm households reported purchasing maize seed during the survey year, this being more common in the Kenya study site (63%) and least common in Tanzania (42% -Table 43). The maize varieties reportedly purchased by the surveyed farm households during the survey year are listed in Table 44. In line with expectations, the majority of the households that purchase maize seed, purchased improved varieties. However, a substantial number also purchase local varieties (32% of households overall), be it alone (20%) or in combination with improved varieties (12% -Table 43). Purchase of local varieties was most commonly reported in Kenya (54% of households), with the local Kikamba being the main maize variety being purchased in both major and minor seasons. For those that purchased, an average of 1.7 maize varieties were purchased, amounting to 30 kg of maize seed at an average cost of US$1 per kg-the reported seed prices being lowest in Ethiopia (US$ 0.4/kg) and highest in Kenya (US$ 1.6 -Table 43). The main time for maize seed purchases is in the run-up to the main season, although in Kenya and Uganda purchases for the minor season are also common (Table 43). This, in combination with varying rain seasons across the region, results in marked maize sales peaks per country, but with peaks spread throughout the year for the region as a whole (Figure 2). Notes: % of households reporting the maize variety for households that purchase maize seed. Listed here are varieties that were named at least 5 times by country, with remainder lumped under others. Column % do not add up to 100% as multiple responses (up to 3 per season) possible across main and minor season. * Primarily reported as local varieties Maize is the major crop for the surveyed farm households. Maize seed alone thereby comprises half of the reported household's seed grain use (by weight -Table 45). Legumes accounted for the bulk of the remaining seed weight, with other cereals only contributing a fraction (Table 45). Whereas over half of the surveyed households purchased maize seed, purchases of other seeds was relatively uncommon (Table 45). Most common was the The use of animal manure and chemical fertilizers showed a marked regional variation, being largely limited to the Ethiopia and Kenya study areas (Table 47). Animal manure originated from the farm, with no purchases being reported. Chemical fertilizer use averaged less than 100 kg per surveyed household in Ethiopia and Kenya, with usage being somewhat more common in Kenya but application rates somewhat higher in Ethiopia (Table 47). Chemical fertilizer primarily included basal fertilizer, and to a lesser extent top dress. The chemical fertilizer cost averaged US$ 0.5 per kg, with the average transport costs amounting to an additional 10% (Table 47). In the case of the Kenya study areas, the use of chemical fertilizer and animal manure is primarily associated with maize production, with only limited application to other crops (Table 48). However, in the case of Ethiopia study areas the situation is mixed -animal manure being primarily applied to maize but maize only receiving a third of the chemical fertilizer and only a quarter of the surveyed households applying chemical fertilizer to maize (Table 48). Maize area also varies between the two study sites, and as a result the fertilizer rate in Ethiopian study sites only averages 12 kg per ha of maize, a fraction of the average 162 applied in Kenya (Table 48). Mechanization in land preparation for maize is limited (5% overall), and largely confined to a tenth of surveyed households in Ethiopia (Table 49). Sole manual land preparation still prevailed amongst the Tanzanian surveyed households, whereas the other study areas relied on a combination of animal traction and manual tillage, with animal traction being particularly prominent in Ethiopia (Table 49). Maize weeding was near universally reported, primarily using physical weeding practices, herbicide purchases being relatively uncommon amongst the surveyed households (9% overall), and largely confined to a fifth of surveyed households in Ethiopia. Insecticide purchases were reported by a tenth of the surveyed households, but largely confined to a quarter of surveyed households in Kenya (Table 49).The surveyed farm households nearly universally relied on family labor for maize production. About half the households used hired labor, although this was markedly more common in Kenya and Uganda study areas (Table 49). Communal labor and particularly shared labor were not commonly reported, with occurrences mainly in the Ethiopian study areas (Table 49). On average, family labor comprises at least three quarters of the labor used in the various maize production activities (Table 50). The contribution of other labor sources is highest for land preparation and weeding, with hired labor contributing about a fifth (Table 50).Weevils were the most common storage problem reported for maize grain and seed (87% overall), with less common problems including rodents (31%), moulds (3%, but largely confined to Uganda) and others (7%, including other insects -Table 51). The number of observations for storage problems of other cereals and legume (both grain and seed) are more limited, but in the case of legumes were similar to maize (mainly weevils, followed by rodents) whereas in the case of other cereals these two problems were equally common (Table 51). Farmers frequently used pesticides to combat the storage problems. Post-harvest losses of maize were reported by 29% of surveyed households (overall), although estimated losses amounted to only 1% of the maize produced on average (see earlier The study also sought to establish surveyed farm households seasonal maize production patterns and areas planted during the survey year and preceding years. Maize yields were subsequently derived from these farmer reported estimates. The maize yield estimates should thus be interpreted with the necessary caution in view of the various potential measurement errors, including in terms of reported area, production levels and units and recall and enumeration error. Encouragingly though, the thus estimated yields compare reasonably with the regional average and country averages reported earlier (Table 1), also keeping in mind that the study targets the drought prone maize growing areas.Farmer reported maize yields averaged 1.4 ton per ha in the survey year, and 100-200 kg per ha less in the two preceding years (Table 52). Maize yields in the Tanzania study area were markedly lower (only 0.7 ton per ha), but were similar in the other study areas (1.5 ton per ha -Table 52). Average yields also varied by maize type: 1.2 ton per ha for local maize, 1.4 ton for OPVs and 1.9 ton for hybrids. A similar yield trend over maize types was apparent in each of the study areas, except for Tanzania where yields were similar for each maize seed type (Table 52). The particular case of the Tanzania study area is perhaps associated with its marked home consumption orientation of maize production and the prevailing maize management practices there, including prevalence of local varieties and non-use of chemical fertilizer. Only in the case of Kenya and Uganda is a seasonal contrast of maize yields possible, but whereas in Uganda yields for the two seasons are similar, they are markedly higher for the main season in Kenya, a reflection of maize production being markedly riskier in the minor season and management practices correspondingly less intensive (Table 52). The present chapter illustrates the diversity in maize varietal use in the drought prone study areas of eastern Africa. Although knowledge of maize varieties is widespread, the number of varieties actually in use is substantially less. Although improved maize varieties comprise about half the seed volume used, there is widespread and long-lasting seed recycling of both local as improved varieties. Improved maize varieties also show marked variation in terms of the relative importance of hybrids vs. OPVs. Finally, a substantial number of households purchase local maize varieties. In line with expectations, the various maize varietal indicators are positively associated with the household's resource endowment (Table 53). This particular classification of the household's resource endowment is however based solely on the first principal component, whereas it is variously associated with the various household assets depending on the study site. The present section provides a further exploration of the various factors associated with maize varietal use. Amongst the various seed use indicators, it focuses on the determinants of improved maize seed purchases. This was perceived as the most relevant and reliable indicator across study sites. Indeed, it was the sole indicator that showed a significant association with asset endowments across all study sites (Table 53). The factors associated with improved maize seed purchases can be variously analyzed, with limited dependent variable models such as Probit particularly popular (CIMMYT, 1993). Probit models were variously used here to explore the improved maize seed purchases by the surveyed farmers both for the eastern Africa study areas as a whole and for the individual study sites. To facilitate comparison the models use the same dependent and independent variables (Table 54). The dichotomous dependent variable represents whether the surveyed farm household purchased improved maize seed varieties during the survey year (0: no purchases; 1: purchases). As independent variables we used various uncorrelated structural variables that characterize the farm household. The regional model also includes country dummies whereas the country models contain district dummies. The district dummy takes a value of 1 for the first of the two districts in each country (as listed in Table 3). To correct for the survey sampling design the cluster option was used in Stata 11 (clustering by country at the regional level and by district at the country level). Overall, we expect asset and income indicators to be positively associated with the purchase of improved maize seed. We would however expect the incidence of drought to be negatively associated. Female headed ownership primarily reflects mobile phones and thereby a willingness of the household to invest in modern communication technology, which thus appears associated with the willingness to invest in modern maize production technology. Notes: See previous table for variable description. For regional model, model coefficients, standard errors, marginal effects and significance presented; for country models only marginal effects and their significance presented. Coefficients preceding * 's differ significantly from 0 ( *** significant at 1% level; ** at 5%; * at 10%). For dummy variables dF/dx is for discrete change from 0 to 1. a In case of Kenya access to credit predicts success perfectly and dropped from model estimation.The study targets drought prone maize producing districts. Still, the share of the farm allocated to maize was positively associated with the IMS purchases in four of the models except for Ethiopia. Reported drought incidence was however only significant and negatively associated with IMS purchases in Ethiopia, although it generally had a negative coefficient in line with expectations. When farm households attended agricultural related extension activities the likelihood of IMS purchases was enhanced at the regional level and in Uganda and Tanzania. Fallowing also enhanced the likelihood of IMS purchases in three models (regional, Ethiopia and Tanzania). Fallowing is associated with abundant land. Similarly households with abundant land (on a per capita basis) were more likely to purchase IMS (regional and Uganda). Abundant labor (on a per capita basis) was negatively associated with IMS purchases in Kenya and Tanzania, but positively in Ethiopia. This reflects the underlying household composition and factor scarcities. Amongst the study sites, Ethiopia combines the lowest average labor availability on a per capita basis with relatively young households. This suggests that Ethiopia farm households have many young dependants and may thus actually be labor constrained. In contrast, the Kenya study site has the highest labor to land ratios, suggesting surplus labor; whereas the Tanzania study site appears particularly capital constrained.IMS purchases are generally cash based and hence facilitated by cash availability. The positive sign of abundant cash income (on a per capita basis) across models is thus in line with expectations, but the coefficient was only significant in the regional and Uganda models. Similarly, access to credit enhanced the likelihood of IMS purchases at the regional level and was even a perfect predictor in the case for Kenya. Contrary to expectations, having an off-farm income source reduced the likelihood of IMS purchases in Tanzania. This is likely associated with the surveyed Tanzanian households being highly cash deficient and maize production being primarily consumption oriented (Tanzania having the lowest share marketed with the highest share consumed), whereby farm households may prefer to allocate resources to off-farm activities instead of maize production. This may partially also explain the earlier observed negative association between phone ownership and IMS purchases in Tanzania.The household head's years of schooling enhanced the likelihood of IMS purchases at the regional level and in Kenya. Having a female headed household head reduced the likelihood of IMS purchases in Kenya (likely reflecting resource constraints), but somewhat surprisingly enhanced the likelihood in Uganda. Having other assets enhanced the likelihood of IMS purchases, including draft animals (Ethiopia and Tanzania), livestock (regional), transport means (regional) and a radio and/or TV (Kenya). Only in Kenya was the district level dummy significant-i.e. the likelihood of IMS purchases was higher in Machakos district compared to Makeuni districts, associated inter alia with Machakos being closer to Nairobi, having a higher population density and a lower incidence of poverty (Muhammad et al., 2010). All the country dummies were negative and significant reflecting the higher average incidence of IMS purchases in the Ethiopia study site.The Probit models thereby reiterate the positive association between the farm household's assets and income and the likelihood of purchasing improved maize seed. This is in line with expectations. However, it also reiterates the challenge of disseminating improved maize varieties in general and drought tolerant maize in particular to the poorer strata of the farming communities in drought prone areas of eastern Africa.The study characterized farm households in the drought prone maize growing areas of eastern Africa synthesizing household survey data collected in Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania (Legese et al., 2010;Mugisha et al., 2011;Muhammad et al., 2010;Temu et al., 2011). The study results are not representative for the respective countries as a whole, but were intended to be representative for the target area-maize growing areas in the medium drought risk zone having a 20-40% probability of failed season. From a methodological perspective, it was encouraging that the study site selection proved robust with the average number of crop failures due to drought during the last decade falling within this target range in each of the countries, although individual responses still oscillated widely (from 0 to 10). However, from a humanitarian and development perspective, such a prevalence of drought proves particularly challenging. Indeed, drought risk was both the most widely reported threat to the livelihoods of the surveyed households (76% overall) as well as the most serious shock that affected the surveyed households during the last decade (89% overall).The surveyed rural households in the drought prone study areas are typically small-scale family farms. Family labor is a key asset and the main labor source for farming activities; whereas land and livestock are the main natural assets. The rural households are relatively poor, and the physical and financial assets correspondingly limited. The livelihood asset base shows some marked variations between the countries surveyed. The Ugandan surveyed households combined the largest average family, farm and herd size and were relatively wellendowed compared to the other survey locations. Tanzanian surveyed households were relatively less-endowed; with intermediate classifications for the Kenya surveyed households (which combined the smallest average farm size with reasonable housing) and the Ethiopia surveyed households (which are relatively young and have relatively large families and herds). The household's asset endowment has a marked influence on the households' livelihood strategy, technology use and risk coping ability. A clear exponent is the positive association between the household's asset endowment and their use of improved maize varieties. 8The surveyed farm households are primarily mixed maize-livestock producers. Granted the study targeted maize growing districts, but the overarching presence of maize in terms of crop production was particularly striking. Maize cultivation in the sample was near-universal with an average 1 ha of maize per household, corresponding to some two-fifths of the farm area and about half the annually cropped area. Maize production is primarily dual purpose in the study areas: to meet household food needs and marketing of surplus. Overall, the relative volume of maize consumed is about double the maize volume sold; and only in the Uganda study areas do maize sales dominate consumption. Livestock are an important component of the livelihood portfolio of the surveyed farm households, ownership being near universal in the various study areas except in Tanzania; and primarily comprising cattle, goats and poultry. The surveyed farm households further complement their livelihood portfolio with off-farm income sources-with off-farm cash income sources nearly universally reported by the surveyed farm households in Kenya against about half elsewhere. Off-farm cash income thereby comprises 39% of annual reported cash income over all sites; with the highest cash incomes reported in Kenya followed by Uganda. Despite being farm households, food expenditure made up the largest expense category, with a third of the households being a net food buyer and only 58% considering themselves as food secure during the survey year. Indeed, after drought, food security issues were the most widely reported threat to the livelihoods of the surveyed farm households (63% overall). Some 29% of surveyed households were reportedly cash deficient-with Tanzanian households being particularly cash strapped. The precarious cash flow is illustrated by about half the surveyed households (overall) having had to sell off some assets during the survey year, most commonly so as to be able to buy food.Despite their location in drought prone areas, agriculture remains the pivot in the livelihood portfolio of the surveyed farm households with 80% seeking to increase agricultural production as their preferred strategy to enhance their livelihoods. Maize was rated as relatively profitable -but also as relatively susceptible to drought and to yield and price risk.The farm households rely on various coping strategies that typically revolve around agricultural diversification, asset accumulation and non-agricultural diversification. The dual purpose nature of maize production implies maize production is relatively sticky downwards-i.e. farmers stated their reluctance to reduce maize production. This suggests great scope for drought tolerant maize varieties as these would reduce the drought and yield risk while maintaining maize production as the central and preferred livelihoods activity.Drought tolerance and early maturity were indeed commonly reported as desired characteristics of the ideal maize variety and as influencing maize varietal choice, only being out-reported by yield potential. Although knowledge of maize varieties is widespread (2.8 varieties on average), the number of varieties actually in use is substantially less (1.3 varieties in the survey year), with non-use typically revolving around grain yield, expensive seed and non-availability of seed. Overall, 70% of the surveyed farm households reported having used improved maize varieties (OPVs or hybrids) during the five years preceding the survey. In the survey year the use of improved and local maize varieties were about equally commonbe it in terms of households reporting their use (respectively 62% and 59% overall) or their share in reported seed use (49% and 51%). However, local varieties are particularly widespread in the Kenya and Tanzania study areas. Improved maize varieties also show marked variation in terms of the relative importance of hybrids vs. OPVs. Interestingly, the Kenya study combines the highest use rate of local varieties with the highest penetration of hybrids and a relative absence of (improved) OPVs. In contrast, the use of OPVs is widespread in the Ethiopian and particularly in the Ugandan study areas.The surveyed farm households started using improved maize seed varieties relatively recently (on average 2002-03 across study sites). There is widespread and long-lasting seed recycling of both local as improved varieties. Lack of money was commonly reported as reason for not (continuously) using improved varieties, reiterating the prevailing cash constraints.Nearly half the farm households reported purchasing improved maize seed during the survey year; but a third also reported purchasing local varieties, something particularly common in the Kenya study site; whereas seed purchases for other grains are uncommon. Limited dependent variable models illustrate the positive association between the farm household's assets and income and the likelihood of purchasing improved maize seed. This is in line with expectations, but also reiterates the challenge of disseminating improved maize varieties in general and drought tolerant maize in particular to the poorer strata of the farming communities in drought prone areas of eastern Africa.Other external input use for maize production is relatively uncommon and limited. Soil fertility is managed by a varying combination of fallowing (particularly Uganda and Tanzania) and animal manure and chemical fertilizers (particularly Kenya and Ethiopia). Land preparation primarily relied on a combination of manual tillage and animal traction and weeding was primarily manual. Family labor comprised at least three-quarters of the labor used in the various maize production activities; with about half the households using some hired labor. Farmer-reported maize yields averaged 1.4 ton per ha in the survey year overall; albeit being markedly lower in the Tanzania study area. Overall maize yields averaged 1.2 ton per ha for local maize, 1.4 ton for OPVs and 1.9 ton for hybrids.The prevailing maize production practices and limited system productivity reiterate the great scope for drought tolerant maize varieties. Indeed, a greater drought tolerance will reduce productivity risk and enhance the expected returns to productivity enhancing investments. Still, the relatively extensive production practices and limited system productivity suggest a need for more comprehensive approaches that combine drought tolerant maize varieties with other productivity enhancing and risk reducing innovations. At the same time the prevailing poverty, the associated marked cash constraints and the dual purpose orientation of maize production call for a portfolio of improved drought tolerant maize varietal options. The Kenya study site is a case in point, whereby the farmers typically lack access to improved OPVs and buy hybrids and local maize varieties side by side. OPVs indeed provide a much needed option to drought prone areas with their inherent system constraints. Yet drought tolerant hybrids are also needed for those maize producing smallholders that are willing and able to invest in such seed. At the same time varietal options should extend beyond mere short duration or drought escaping. Medium duration varieties may provide viable and productive options provided they are drought tolerant.Enhancing the options of drought tolerant maize varieties available to farmers would have a number of implications. Such diversity offers new opportunities to maize seed companies, although it would also increase the number of their products and competition among products, increase transaction costs and perhaps reduce the scope of any single dominant product. It would also call for the strengthening of innovation pathways and information provision to the smallholder farming community. Many stakeholders, and particularly the less educated and poorer smallholders, already have difficulty in fully understanding the difference between OPVs and hybrids; between drought escaping and drought tolerance. It should thereby be acknowledged that farmers rely on a variety of information sources that often extend beyond the traditional public extension services, and increasingly rely on novel communication channels such as mobile phones.The present synthesis and underlying country studies were primarily intended as an initial characterization of the maize producing households in the drought prone areas of eastern Africa. This intended to provide the necessary context and enhance our understanding of the potential contribution of drought tolerant maize. Still, this only provides an initial piece of the puzzle. To address the complex challenges of realizing and enhancing the potential of drought tolerant maize in SSA this needs to be complemented by further socio-economic studies and interdisciplinary research. These will particularly enhance our ability to monitor, provide feedback and assess impacts and help facilitate enhanced research and development procedures and targeting of drought tolerant maize.The present study also allows us to draw some useful lessons for future characterization endeavors. By adhering to a common research approach, questionnaire and dataset, the synthesis and regional contrasts were greatly facilitated vis-à-vis earlier regional studies (e.g. Doss et al., 2003). Still, the synthesis would have benefitted from a stronger adherence to the common research approach for at least the core data-including sample selection and data entry. The study would also have potentially benefitted from a larger sample size (particularly for the second batch countries, but also for the first batch countries) and more nationally representative samples (i.e. beyond the two drought prone districts). This would have enhanced the potential relevance of the characterization data to achieve the secondary objective of using the same as a baseline for future impact assessment. The study would also have benefitted from a shorter questionnaire to collect the core minimal data, perhaps supplemented with additional modules as appropriate. Such proposed adjustments have the benefit of hindsight but also imply trade-offs (e.g. single vs. multiple visits). Indeed, research resources and particularly staff time are typically limited and thereby directly imply trade-offs of any adjustments. For instance, the underlying country studies were originally intended only in the first batch countries (Kenya and Ethiopia in the case of eastern Africa), but were subsequently extended to the second batch countries. This clearly was advantageous in terms of providing a broader geographic coverage and perspective, but at the same time diluted the available resources and delayed the completion of the present synthesis.Finally, it should be recalled that the present study purposively targeted the 20-40% probability of failed season (PFS) zone. For the characterization purposes of the present study, this proved adequate. The incidence of drought is however not limited to that area. Higher probabilities of failed season (i.e. 40-100% PFS) would correspond with even more frequent and severe droughts -but such areas become increasingly marginal for maize production and crop production for that matter. Some may argue that even the 20-40% PFS zone is not suitable to maize and that farmers would be better off cultivating other crops generally perceived as more drought tolerant than maize such as cassava and the array of semi-arid coarse cereals. However, such arguments miss the overarching rationale for growing maize in the first place -the widespread preference of the market and farm households alike for maize over other coarse cereals in large swathes of SSA. The drought risk in the 20-40% PFS target area thereby seems to affect how the maize is grown, not whether maize is grown. At the same time, a lower PFS (i.e. 0-20%) only implies a lower probability of failed season. Indeed, maize growing areas with higher potential also are subjected to random drought events. The most severe may lead to the occasional failed season, but even less severe drought can imply substantial maize production losses (also in view of the higher productivity levels and associated input use). Their lower probability and less visible incidence make understanding and quantifying the drought impact in such environments more problematic. Indeed, drought discussions with stakeholders and farmers tend to automatically gravitate towards situations where drought is tangible -such as the targeted 20-40% PFS zone and/or drier areas. It is therefore important to note that the potential contribution of drought tolerant maize varieties is not limited to the 20-40% PFS zone targeted here. Yet at the same time understanding that potential beyond the 20-40% PFS zone through household surveys and the like will be challenging. One may thus need to complement characterization studies such as the present with crop simulation endeavors to quantify the impact of drought in the more favorable areas."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1300899507.json b/main/part_2/1300899507.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..60fc5030b027036f403ce40cfcc6d72b30961431 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1300899507.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5ca31935c68d15b5d94e20293b920fe6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/835df5a3-7e61-4fc2-bbce-1215dd639d59/retrieve","id":"1983490765"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f6e4a4cc-50cc-48a1-9135-1add1954c2ec","content":"This document series compiles key indicators from the three levels of the baseline for each site. Indicators include: demography and basic site characteristics of each site, rainfall distribution, changes in farming practices and land management, income sources, food security and food sources, asset ownership by households and involvement in organisations and more.This CCAFS baseline indicator document was developed for the CCAFS site at Makueni/Wote, in Kenya. Relative importance in the portfolio of organisations placed on climate or weather related activities"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1306522012.json b/main/part_2/1306522012.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..939d457e25005b295fce26707514e878db1c42c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1306522012.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ec2249e9b7e190fd14f7593c61a2c9b9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/57227a0a-95e8-4551-b919-944084aabeab/retrieve","id":"-1613973188"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a1b364c7-8457-4c66-8875-14edf4ffbfa0","content":"More meat milk and eggs by and for the poor"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1316205653.json b/main/part_2/1316205653.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0758bb897c9a454ee7ad82d2713bf01d65e21a29 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1316205653.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"912c0b42583b0d251b0ad1ff2fe2c2c8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4fb39373-411f-4fa2-91f8-5e95683bd3ec/retrieve","id":"2092771093"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6a4d3499-1cc1-4890-9eb7-db76393c3889","content":"Community seedbanks and emerging networks of community seedbanks contribute to the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Community seedbanks can secure improved access to and availability of diverse, locally adapted crops and varieties and enhance related indigenous knowledge and skills in plant management including seed selection, treatment, storage, multiplication and distribution.In July 2018, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and Bioversity International, with the support of the Global Crop Diversity Trust and the Secretariat of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA), held two events in Rome, Italy, to highlight the contribution of community seedbanks and the emerging networks of community seedbanks to the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. 1 Eight representatives of organizations supporting community seedbanks from Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America presented an overview of achievements, challenges, lessons learned and new opportunities in their countries. They also shared reflections on the prospects of community seedbanks and their networks. This brief presents a summary of their presentations and reflections.(adapted from https://www.archenoah.at/english/about-arche-noah) ARCHE NOAH was established in 1990 as an initiative of heirloom gardeners, farmers and journalists, concerned with the future of seeds and heirloom varieties. ARCHE NOAH responds to the loss of agrobiodiversity with a positive vision and numerous activities that contribute to more diversity, for example, through cultivation of threatened varieties in our gardens, through consumer awareness and political commitment. This attitude connects 13,000 members involved with ARCHE NOAH today. It is a vision of providing respectful care for nature as our number one provider. It is to look at our cultivated plants respectfully, to value gardening and farming as a cultural achievement, to consider ethically-motivated consumption as a contribution to organic and sustainable agriculture, and to make cooking a declaration of love.The Butia Palm Groves Route (Rota dos Butiazais, in Portuguese) is an innovative initiative that connects local practices and cultures with new knowledge generation and documentation to conserve and use sustainably an important biodiversity resource that offers ecosystem services and income generation. It represents a cultural network linked to the territories of the remnants of palm grove ecosystems in Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina. The Route aims to add value to Butia fruits, leaves and seeds and associated sociobiodiversity to promote social and economic changes that contribute to regional development and foster local and sectoral interests (e.g. tourism, livestock farming, organic agriculture and handicraft industry). In 2015, many people and institutions joined forces to establish a regional network of living community seedbanks to protect and promote the Butia. Butia palm groves consist of thousands of palms covering extensive areas. The palms are integral to the culture and history of the local people. Fruits can be consumed fresh or used as culinary ingredients for jelly, juice and liqueur. The leaves are used to produce many utilitarian and decorative objects such as baskets, hats, bags, purses and placemats. In the past, fibres from the leaves were widely used to produce mattresses. The community seedbanks receive support from the China Farmer Seeds Network (FSN). Established in 2013, FSN brings together more than 30 communities from 10 provinces, trains farmers in community seed banking, organizes exchanges among FSN communities and beyond, facilitates the establishment of community-based (often womenled) seed production units, promotes community-supported agriculture and ecological farming and links farmers to urban consumers for income generation. FSN uses a systematic and holistic seed systems approach to carry out these activities.CCAP and FSN are mobilizing policy and legal support to strengthen farmer seed systems. In China's recently completed Seed Law revision, they succeeded to maintain Article 27 (allowing farmers to save, exchange, produce and sell seeds locally) after law-makers had proposed to remove it. This success can be ascribed to the strong collective action of farmers and other stakeholders.In 1991, USC-Canada supported the establishment of the first community seed and tree seedling banks in the country in the village of Douentza Mopti and later in San and Tominian (Ségou) with the help of projects managed by the Genetic Resources Unit of the Institut d'Economie Rurale (URG/IER) and various national and international partners (among which, Bioversity International and FAO). The goal is to contribute to food security by means of the conservation and sustainable use of local plant genetic resources. The community seedbanks provide access to seed through decentralized seed production; they safeguard local diversity and related Future efforts aim to: strengthen links among community seedbanks at all levels through exchange visits and study tours; build their capacities; mobilize more policy support at national level; turn community seedbanks into agrobiodiversity innovation, sharing and learning centres combining traditional and scientific knowledge; and find financial resources to maintain community seedbanks effectively and sustainably.Mexico has 26 community seedbanks located throughout the country which exist since 2007. They are part of the strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture implemented by the National System of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (SINAREFI). The central objective of the community seedbanks is to support communities in case of seed losses due to natural disasters allowing the re-establishment of farmers' cultivation systems and the re-introduction of commonly used varieties. A second objective is to ensure the availability of seed for each planting cycle. The main activities carried out are: seed collection and distribution; participatory crop improvement; seed production; and education and awareness activities. The community seedbanks safeguard seeds of the so-called milpa system: the traditional system of maize, common bean and squash combined in the same field enriched with introduced crops such as wheat and oats. The seeds maintained include local varieties, improved old varieties, varieties derived from plant breeding and commercial varieties; the latter obtained more recently. The financing of the community seedbanks comes from the Ministry of Agriculture channelled to a number of public and private entities that take care of establishing and supporting community seedbanks at local level. The operations of the community seedbanks are carried out by the legal representative of the communities, interested producers, scientists, extension service agents and representatives of state governments (Mexico has a federal state system).The main lessons learned so far are: community seedbanks can be an effective part of a comprehensive strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture; producers must understand the principles of seed safeguarding under optimal conditions and apply these locally by making used of appropriate materials and practices; community seedbanks are crucial in areas of high Photo: At the Koumnatou seed fair, Bougouni, Sikasso, Mali. Credit: Institut d'Economie Rurale natural disaster risk, which should be carefully identified and prioritized for support; community seedbanks should be legally recognized and protected to guarantee operational viability and sustainability.Community seedbanks in Nepal have nearly 25 years of history. They were initiated with the support of NGOs who remain important supporters. In 2009, having observed a number of successfully-managed community seedbanks, the government of Nepal adopted the approach and piloted new community seedbanks in a few districts. Community seedbanks are included in recent agrobiodiversity and seed-related legislations. Community seedbanks focus on promoting the conservation and sustainable use of traditional varieties, increase access to quality seeds and planting materials of diverse crops and varieties and generate income for members associated with them. These activities contribute to realize farmers' rights as outlined in Article 9 of the ITPGRFA. Community seedbanks are This served to rebuild the local seed systems and defend the rights of the indigenous communities. The community seedbank plays an important role to turn the Potato Park in a Noah's Arc where the largest in situ potato diversity in the world is conserved and where the crop can continue to evolve under environmental conditions and adapt to climate changes.Currently, the community seedbank holds 1,347 accessions, which Potato Park farmers are free to use at any time according to certain rules and regulations established by the Association of Potato Park Communities spelled out in an Intercommunity Agreement. The Potato Seed Guardians known as \"Arariwas\" manage the collection of the community seedbank on a dayto-day basis. Apart from conservation and exchange of seeds, the community seedbank also develops activities to add value to potatoes, such as the production of soaps and shampoos. Women are leading these activities. The community seedbank has an information system that documents and assists in the further development of traditional knowledge. Seeds are exchanged nationally and internationally during seed fairs and other events. With the support of ANDES, the communities have developed a biocultural protocol that defines how benefits generated from the conservation and sustainable use of potatoes in the Potato Park will be fairly shared.Community Technology Development Trust (CTDT), an NGO, has supported community seedbanks for more than two decades. CTDT considers supporting community seedbanks a critical strategy and mechanism to ensure on-farm conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture at the community level, in particular for neglected and under-utilized crops and plants. The facilities of a community seedbank empower farmers to own and control the means of production, the selection of ecologically adaptive crops, provide opportunities for crop diversification in the face of climate change, and facilitate seed and knowledge exchanges and support to farmer seed systems.In Zimbabwe, the CTDT-supported community seedbanks are linked with the national and regional crop improvement programmes, the CGIAR centres operating in the country, national genebanks, scientists, extension workers and policy-makers. They enable farmers to benefit from accessing a wide range of advanced and improved materials from the agricultural research institutions. This is important for enhancing agricultural productivity and improving food and nutrition security. The number of community seedbanks continues to grow.The way forward: some reflections• The diversity of community seedbanks around the world in terms of functions, activities, types and number of crops and crop varieties, governance and management modalities, reach and networking is remarkable and should be cherished.• Women seed custodians play important roles in the everyday management of community seedbanks but more could be done to recognize, reward and support them. • Government support (political, financial and technical) can strengthen the operations and viability of community seedbanks and their networks.• There is a need to revise seed policies in many countries. These policies do not pay attention to community seedbanks and often hinder functions and activities, such as the production and marketing of farmer varieties.• Community seedbank networking at all levels can speed up learning and give community seedbanks a stronger voice.• Community seedbanks can be(come) centres of farmer innovation and play a role in the national innovation system.• A global platform to connect and strengthen community seedbanks would increase the visibility of community seedbanks, facilitate exchanges, support action research and learning, and advocate for policy and legal change and support.Correct citation: Vernooy, R., Clancy, E., Diulgheroff, S., Furman, B., Gonzalez Santos, R., Guarino, L., Kajtna, B., Marino, M., Mushita, A., Shrestha, P., Song, Y., Egon Sosinski Jr, E., Subedi, A. and Villacorta, J. (2018). Joining forces to strengthen community seedbanks worldwide. Rome, Bioversity International, 8 pp. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1318189452.json b/main/part_2/1318189452.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..82645f0b71b713915cc3834dc0ea1d8f03118d09 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1318189452.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4270a13680872fc355600277708dc222","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/862c5761-72f5-4216-9b22-653fa6e15175/retrieve","id":"-49634698"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f5e6c97d-1290-4e86-acf1-6fda498983d5","content":"levels did not vary significantly across districts. However, Mbale had the highest average technical efficiency levels (51.84%) among bean farms, while Budaka had the least efficient bean farms with a mean of 41.44%.  In fact, there were differences between the lowest and highest technically efficient districts: the average technical efficiency levels between Mbale and Budaka were significantly different. This is attributed to Mbale having the highest bean productivity per ha, while Budaka was the least productive.Key results: Farm-specific efficiency scores across districts"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1321642310.json b/main/part_2/1321642310.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c0d20df20cf4214ffae9a3226c8de1e35d93df0 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1321642310.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a82a09b94bf530864fb379b313b9c4b8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/855b29a9-9719-4105-ab7f-88758b958743/retrieve","id":"-918285880"},"keywords":["landraces","genetic diversity","population structure","West Africa","maize improvement","DArTseq markers"],"sieverID":"77235b2f-9e8a-4f42-abbe-18fe79600ae8","content":"Genetic adaptation of maize to the increasingly unpredictable climatic conditions is an essential prerequisite for achievement of food security and sustainable development goals in sub-Saharan Africa. The landraces of maize; which have not served as sources of improved germplasm; are invaluable sources of novel genetic variability crucial for achieving this objective. The overall goal of this study was to assess the genetic diversity and population structure of a maize panel of 208 accessions; comprising landrace gene pools from Burkina Faso (58), Ghana (43), and Togo (89), together with reference populations (18) from the maize improvement program of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Genotyping the maize panel with 5974 DArTseq-SNP markers revealed immense genetic diversity indicated by average expected heterozygosity (0.36), observed heterozygosity (0.5), and polymorphic information content (0.29). Model-based population structure; neighbor-joining tree; discriminant analysis of principal component; and principal coordinate analyses all separated the maize panel into three major sub-populations; each capable of providing a wide range of allelic variation. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that 86% of the variation was within individuals; while 14% was attributable to differences among gene pools. The Burkinabe gene pool was strongly differentiated from all the others (genetic differentiation values >0.20), with no gene flow (Nm) to the reference populations (Nm = 0.98). Thus; this gene pool could be a target for novel genetic variation for maize improvement. The results of the present study confirmed the potential of this maize panel as an invaluable genetic resource for future design of association mapping studies to speed-up the introgression of this novel variation into the existing breeding pipelines.Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important cereal crops consumed in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and an essential component of livestock feed in the developed as well as developing world.We analyzed 208 maize accessions obtained from international and national gene banks in Africa (Supplementary Table S1). The maize panel comprised 190 landraces representing gene pools from Burkina Faso (58), Ghana (43), and Togo (89) (Supplementary Figure S1). The landraces from Burkina Faso and Togo were sourced from the gene bank at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, whereas those from Ghana were provided by the Plant Genetics Resources Institute (PGRI) at Bunso, Ghana. The majority of these landraces were collected from farmers' fields in the 1970s and 1980s. However, the eco-geographical data of the collection sites of the landraces were not available. The study also included a diverse set (18) of drought-and heat-tolerant open pollinated populations (hereafter referred to as reference populations) developed by the Maize Improvement Program at IITA (MIP-IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.For each accession, total genomic DNA was isolated from bulked leaf composites from 15 seedlings at two weeks old according to the DArT protocol (https://www.diversityarrays.com/orderinstructions/ plant-dna-extraction-protocol-for-dart/). The quality of each DNA sample was visualized by electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel, and the purified DNA was further quantified using a nano-drop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington DE, USA). Certified DNA samples were then sent to the Integrated Genomic Service and Support (IGSS) genotyping platform, Nairobi, Kenya, for genotyping. High-throughput genotyping was conducted in 96 plex DArTseq protocol, and SNPs were called using the DArT's proprietary software, DArTSoft, as previously described [22]. Reads and tags found in each sequencing result were aligned to the Zea mays L. genome reference, version AGPV3 (B73 Ref-Gen v4 assembly) [23].A total of 47,441 putative DArTseq markers were generated from the 208 maize panel. Prior to further analysis, the raw data set was filtered to remove markers with call rate <0.8, minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.05, and unmapped SNP markers. Thereafter, markers with no missing rate were retained using the TASSEL software version 5.2.12 [24]. The retained markers were subjected to various genetic diversity analyses including basic diversity statistics such as polymorphic information content (PIC), MAF, observed heterozygosity (H o ), and expected heterozygosity (H e ) using PowerMarker v. 3.2.5 [25]. The population structure of the maize panel was inferred using the Admixture model-based clustering algorithm implemented STRUCTURE 2.3.4 [26]. The adhoc number of clusters (k) was varied from 1 to 12, with 10,000 burn-in steps, followed by 10,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations, as previously described [20,27]. For each k, ten independent iterations were implemented. The most likely number of k was determined by the ad hoc ∆ k statistics [28] embedded in Structure Harvester [29]. Accessions with membership proportions (Q-value) ≥80% were assigned to groups, while those with membership probabilities less than 80% were designated as admixtures [30]. The population structure of each gene pool (Burkinabe, Ghanaian, Togolese, and reference populations) were also estimated as described above. A discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) was carried out on the 208 maize panel using the first 40 principal components using the adegenet R package [31]. Membership probabilities of the individuals for the different gene pools were estimated using the \"find cluster\" function implemented in adegenet. Further, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was conducted to reveal the genetic relationships among the maize accessions using GenAlEx v. 6.503 software [32]. An unrooted neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed by following the procedure of Nei [33] with 1000 bootstrap replicates in PowerMarker v3.25 [25]. The resulting NJ tree was visualized in Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version X [34] and edited using Figtree software v. 1.4.4 [35]. Genetic relationships within each maize gene pool were elucidated through construction of an unrooted NJ tree, as described above. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was estimated in GenAlEx v. 6.503 [32] to partition components of genetic variance among and within the populations (k). Calculation of pairwise genetic differentiation statistics (F ST ) and haploid number of migrants (Nm) between gene pools was performed using GenAlEx v6.503 [32] with 999 permutations. F ST measures the amount of genetic variance that can be explained by population structure based on Wright's F-statistics [36], while Nm = [(1/F ST ) − 1]/4. An Nm value less than 1 indicates limited gene exchange among subpopulations [36].Out of the total 47,441 putative DArTseq markers, 5974 were retained after filtering. The GBS-DArTseq markers were unequally distributed across the ten chromosomes of the 208 maize panel. Chromosome 1 had the highest number of markers (905), while chromosome 10 had the least (422) (Supplementary Figure S2). H e , H o , MAF, and PIC values estimated for the entire maize panel (208 accessions) averaged 0.36, 0.50, 0.28, and 0.29, respectively (Table 1 The model-based simulation of population structure analysis of the maize panel (208 accessions) showed that the delta K values from the mean log-likelihood probabilities plateaued at K = 3 (389.43), followed by K = 4 (276.33), and K = 2 (273.07) (Figure 1a). At K = 3, the 208 maize panel was divided into three sub-populations (Figure 1b). Using an 80% membership probability threshold, 122 accessions (58.65%) were successfully assigned to the three subpopulations. In comparison, 86 accessions with a probability of associations less than 80% were designated as an admixed population (Supplementary Table S2). Subpopulation 1 was the most uniform (membership coefficient averaged, 90%), and it contained 53 landraces (49 from Burkina Faso, 3 from Togo, and 1 from Ghana). Subpopulations 2 and 3, which constituted 12.5% and 20.67% of the panel, respectively, were admixtures of Ghanaian and Togolese landraces, together with reference populations. Specifically, subpopulation 2 consisted of 26 accessions, 10 reference populations, and 11 and 5 Togolese and Ghanaian landraces, respectively. Subpopulation 3 comprised 24 and 15 landrace accessions from Ghana, and Togo, respectively, and 4 accessions from the reference population. The admixed group contained 60, 13, and 9 landraces from Togo, Ghana, and Burkina Faso, respectively, plus 4 reference populations (Supplementary Table S2). The additional smaller peaks observed at K = 4 (276.33) and K = 2 (273.07) implied the presence of subgroups within the three major groups (Figure 1). Therefore, an independent STRUCTURE run was performed for each gene pool. Sub-clustering of the Burkinabe and Ghanaian gene pools both yielded a sharp peak at K = 2 (Figure 2a,b). Sub-clustering the reference populations and Togolese landraces showed the highest peak at K = 3, and K = 9, respectively (Figure 2c,d). A substantial degree of admixture was observed for each gene pool (Supplementary Table S3).Genes 2020, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 13and Ghanaian gene pools both yielded a sharp peak at K = 2 (Figure 2a,b). Sub-clustering the reference populations and Togolese landraces showed the highest peak at K = 3, and K = 9, respectively (Figure 2c,d). A substantial degree of admixture was observed for each gene pool (Supplementary Table S3).(a) (b) and Ghanaian gene pools both yielded a sharp peak at K = 2 (Figure 2a,b). Sub-clustering the reference populations and Togolese landraces showed the highest peak at K = 3, and K = 9, respectively (Figure 2c,d). A substantial degree of admixture was observed for each gene pool (Supplementary Table S3).(a) (b) Using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) implemented in DAPC, a maximum of K = 3 was obtained, which corresponded to three groups of maize accessions in the panel (Figure 3). Estimation of the cluster membership revealed that cluster three had the highest number of accessions (94) followed by cluster two with 77 accessions, and cluster one with the smallest number of accessions (37). Of the 94 accessions in cluster three, 58 (61.70%) and 29 (30.85%) were landraces from Togo and Ghana, respectively, including six reference populations and the landraces from Burkina Faso (Supplementary Table S4). All the accessions in cluster two were landraces from Burkina Faso (57), Togo (17), and Ghana (3). Of the 37 accessions in cluster 1, 14 (37.84%) were Togolese landraces, 12 (32.43%) were from the reference populations, while 11 (29.73%) were Ghanaian landraces. Using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) implemented in DAPC, a maximum of K = 3 was obtained, which corresponded to three groups of maize accessions in the panel (Figure 3). Estimation of the cluster membership revealed that cluster three had the highest number of accessions (94) followed by cluster two with 77 accessions, and cluster one with the smallest number of accessions (37). Of the 94 accessions in cluster three, 58 (61.70%) and 29 (30.85%) were landraces from Togo and Ghana, respectively, including six reference populations and the landraces from Burkina Faso (Supplementary Table S4). All the accessions in cluster two were landraces from Burkina Faso (57), Togo (17), and Ghana (3). Of the 37 accessions in cluster 1, 14 (37.84%) were Togolese landraces, 12 (32.43%) were from the reference populations, while 11 (29.73%) were Ghanaian landraces. Further investigation of the genomic structure of the maize panel using the PCoA indicated three subpopulations as per the STRUCTURE simulation and DAPC analyses (Figure 4). The total amount of genetic variation explained by the first two principal coordinates was 57%. The PCoA clearly separated subpopulation 3 (by PCo2), which showed a higher degree of admixture between Ghanaian and Togolese landraces, including six reference populations and a landrace from Burkina Faso. The other two subpopulations appeared to be distributed along PCo1. Although some degree of overlap among landrace gene pools was shown in subpopulation 1, located at the upper extreme of PCo1, ~75% were Burkinabe landraces. Subpopulation 2 distributed along the lower extreme of PCo1 was the most distant of the three, comprising the majority of the reference populations and four Ghanaian landraces.As per the STRUCTURE, DAPC, and PCoA results, the NJ phylogenetic tree also showed three sub-populations with higher degrees of admixture among Ghanaian and Togolese landraces, and reference populations (Figure 5). The neighbor-joining tree performed for each gene pool divided the Further investigation of the genomic structure of the maize panel using the PCoA indicated three subpopulations as per the STRUCTURE simulation and DAPC analyses (Figure 4). The total amount of genetic variation explained by the first two principal coordinates was 57%. The PCoA clearly separated subpopulation 3 (by PCo2), which showed a higher degree of admixture between Ghanaian and Togolese landraces, including six reference populations and a landrace from Burkina Faso. The other two subpopulations appeared to be distributed along PCo1. Although some degree of overlap among landrace gene pools was shown in subpopulation 1, located at the upper extreme of PCo1, ~75% were Burkinabe landraces. Subpopulation 2 distributed along the lower extreme of PCo1 was the most distant of the three, comprising the majority of the reference populations and four Ghanaian landraces.Burkinabe and Ghanaian gene pools into two main clusters (Figure 6b). The Togolese landraces and the reference populations were grouped into nine and three clusters, respectively (Figure 6b,c). Cord.2 (21%)Cord. 1 (36%) As per the STRUCTURE, DAPC, and PCoA results, the NJ phylogenetic tree also showed three sub-populations with higher degrees of admixture among Ghanaian and Togolese landraces, and reference populations (Figure 5). The neighbor-joining tree performed for each gene pool divided the Burkinabe and Ghanaian gene pools into two main clusters (Figure 6b). The Togolese landraces and the reference populations were grouped into nine and three clusters, respectively (Figure 6b,c).Genes 2020, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 13Burkinabe and Ghanaian gene pools into two main clusters (Figure 6b). The Togolese landraces and the reference populations were grouped into nine and three clusters, respectively (Figure 6b,c). The AMOVA revealed that 14% of the total variation was found among gene pools, while the rest (86%) was within gene pools (Table 2). The overall F ST value of the maize panel was 0.21, and the Nm value was 1.58. As shown in Table 3, the Burkinabe gene pool had the highest F ST value (0.28), and the Ghanaian and Togolese gene pools had the lowest (0.18, each). The pairwise F ST values ranged from 0.14 (Ghanaian vs. Togolese) to 0.31 (Burkinabe vs. reference populations). Similarly, Nm values between gene pools varied from 0.98 (Burkinabe vs. reference populations) to 2.83 (Ghanaian vs. reference populations). The Nm value between the Ghanaian and Togolese gene pools was 2.63. A well-characterized and diverse germplasm is an essential requisite for genetic enhancement of crops. In this study, we applied GBS technology to explore the genetic diversity and population structure of a maize panel comprising landrace gene pools from Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo, plus a reference population from IITA-MIP. The results of the estimated diversity indices revealed ample genetic diversity within the maize panel indicated by average H e (0.36) and H o (0.5). The He obtained in this study was comparable to the 0.36 reported for provitamin A (PVA) quality protein maize (QPM) germplasm from IITA-MIP [21] but was higher than that reported for maize landraces from Eastern Africa (H e = 0.25), Western Africa (H e = 0.18), and Sahel Africa (H e = 0.24) [9] as well as tropical maize breeding populations (H e = 0.22) [27] including IITA early-maturing white inbred lines [20]. Characterization of the Burkinabe, Ghanaian, and Togolese maize pools showed different values for the estimated diversity indices. The results indicated that the Togolese gene pool (H e = 0.36, H o = 0.50) contained slightly higher diversity than the Burkinabe (H e = 0.30, Ho = 0.41) and Ghanaian (H e = 0.32, H o = 0.34) landrace pools. Further, the low variation in the genetic indices identified between the landraces as a group, and the reference populations showed that the two germplasm sets possessed similar genetic diversity (Table 1). These results agreed with previous findings that tropical maize germplasm is highly diverse with H e > 0.3 [37][38][39]. The mean PIC obtained in the present study, 0.29 using 5974 DArTseq SNPs for the 208 maize accessions was higher than the 0.19 and 0.26 reported for tropical early-maturing maize inbred lines using 15,047 [30] and 7224 SNPs for a sample size of 94 and 134, respectively [20,27]. The discrepancies between the results of our study and those of earlier researchers may be due to the use of different genetic materials, the sample sizes, and the number of SNPs used. Nonetheless, the mean PIC value in this study was like the 0.29 recently reported for tropical PVA-QPM maize germplasm using 8171 DArTseq SNP markers [21].The Evanno criterion employed for the model-based simulation of population structure identified the peak level of ∆K at K = 3 (Figure 1a), which depicted the presence of three genetically distinct subpopulations (Figure 1b). The proportion of admixed accessions (47%) in the maize panel, based on a membership probability threshold of 80%, suggested moderate genetic differentiation and gene flow. The DAPC, PCoA, and NJ phylogenetic analyses results all illustrated the existence of three subpopulations in the whole set of 208 maize accessions. Comparison of the results of the four complementary clustering methods (STRUCTURE, DAPC, NJ tree, and PCoA) revealed high consistency in the individuals assigned to each group, which reinforced the findings that the identified groups were indeed genetically distinct. The close proximity between Togolese and Ghanaian gene pools suggested high genetic relatedness of the two gene pools. This result was expected due to the geographical proximity of the two countries and the similarity of the climatic conditions. The Burkinabe gene pool largely diverged from all others, suggesting its adaptation to Sahel conditions, which is in agreement with its pattern of phenotypic diversity [12]. Multivariate analyses revealed high affinity of Ghanaian and Togolese landraces with the reference populations (Figures 1 and 3-5). It is likely that some of these accessions are not true landraces but, rather, old improved cultivars that were either recollected or wrongly classified, as farmers usually consider improved varieties cultivated over longer periods in a given area as landraces [40]. The grouping together of some landraces with the reference populations also suggested a pedigree relationship. Hence, it is possible that some of the landraces analyzed in this study were local varieties that were selected by earlier maize breeders in IITA, based on high grain yield, earliness, and resistance to the maize streak virus (MSV), and adaptation to the drought and heat stress as starting materials for the development of inbred lines that were later involved in cross-breeding (see http://r4dreview.iita.org/index.php/tag/maize-improvement/). The additional smaller peaks observed at K = 4 (276.33) and K = 2 (273.07) implied the presence of subgroups within the three major groups (Figure 1). Therefore, an independent STRUCTURE run was performed for each gene pool (Figure 2). The high degree of genetic admixtures within each landrace gene pool observed with ancestry share of <80% probably reflects considerable levels of gene flow or germplasm exchange. Results of previous studies have shown that such an admixture is not unusual in landraces from restricted geographical backgrounds [40].According to Frankham et al. [41], an F ST value greater than 0.15 can be considered as significantly differentiating populations. Thus, in the present study, the overall F ST value (0.21) supported the presence of significant genetic divergence within the maize panel. Wright [36] reported that an Nm value less than 1 indicated limited gene exchange among populations. In the present study, the overall Nm value of 1.58 (Table 2) indicated that moderate genetic exchange or gene flow may have occurred, leading to the moderate genetic differentiation between gene pools. This observation was consistent with the AMOVA results (Table 2), which indicated that 14% of the total variation was accounted for by gene pool variations. This result is consistent with the findings of previous studies [42]. According to the F ST values, the Burkinabe gene pool was the most differentiated (Table 3), in agreement with its divergence as revealed by the clustering methods (STRUCTURE, PCoA, DAPC, and NJ analyses). The divergence between the reference populations and landraces varied among the different gene pools. In particular, the low affinity of the Burkinabe gene pool with the reference population (F ST = 0.31, Nm = 0.98) suggested little involvement of the original Sahelian gene pool in the development of the modern maize varieties presently grown in the sub region. This observation is biologically and historically meaningful since in West Africa, the reference maize gene pool called Composite Y [43], which was developed through recombination of 145 flint landraces of West Africa savannah zone, contained only 2% each of the genetic materials from Burkina Faso and Niger, as well as 1% of those from Senegal [44]. In the analyses of the isozyme variability in West African maize cultivars, Sanou et al. [45] showed that Burkinabe landraces were distinct, even though some levels of gene flow between them and an elite open pollinated variety (SR 22) developed by IITA in 1984 from CIMMYT Pop 22 and widely adopted in Burkina Faso [46] was observed. Therefore, the Burkinabe gene pool, having been grown and selected by farmers over many generations under warmer and drier conditions, could harbor novel and favorable alleles for improving maize for tolerance to drought and heat stresses. It is notable that in our earlier work on this maize panel, the high degree of tolerance of the Burkinabe landraces to drought, heat, and the combined heat and drought stresses was unrivalled [47,48]. The high genetic similarity observed between the Ghanaian and Togolese landraces was supported by their low F ST (0.14) and high Nm (2.63) values. This result further reflected the gene flow via seed exchanges and local preferences towards a given agrotype owing to similar climatic conditions. These may have significantly shaped the distribution of the genetic diversity within Ghanaian and Togolese maize landraces, as was previously suggested [12]. The F ST and Nm values (Table 3) suggested that the Ghanaian gene pool was closer to the reference populations, in agreement with PCoA stratification (Figure 4). Indeed, the reference set analyzed in this study included two popular cultivars that are commonly cultivated in Ghana (Aburoheema and Obatanpa GH, coded IM1 and IM6, respectively). The deep knowledge of the genetic diversity and structure of Sahel and coastal West African maize landraces revealed in the present study provides an essential platform for efficient use of these valuable maize gene pools.In the present study, we explored the genetic diversity and relationships within and between a maize panel comprising landrace gene pools from Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo and compared each to a reference maize population. The analysis of genetic diversity parameters indicated ample genetic diversity in the maize panel. The four multivariate methods were consistent in dividing the maize panel into three distinct genetic groups, each capable of providing different sources of variation for maize genetic enhancement. The genetic divergence of the Burkinabe gene pool was particularly remarkable. It, therefore, clearly represents an invaluable genetic resource that should be exploited to address the overarching goal of improving maize for adaptation to different environments, ecosystems, and stress situations. Overall, the genetic diversity revealed in this study has provided an invaluable resource for future analyses of candidate genes for local adaptations using robust association mapping experiments.The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/9/1054/s1, Figure S1: Map of West Africa showing the countries of origin of the maize landraces analyzed in this study. Figure S2: Distribution of the 5974 DArTseq GBS makers across the 10 chromosomes of the 208 maize accessions. Table S1: Excel file with the description of the accessions analyzed in this study. Table S2 "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1329827292.json b/main/part_2/1329827292.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ba914775e83486fd67a2f623c3c62ba8e8b293c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1329827292.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0d729229746f64f43b170275200967b6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/1e488750-4bd9-4dbf-a43d-05cf5707435e/content","id":"-1850175840"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"88396e58-a6ce-4e6d-b451-9a2e4753c627","content":"Race Ug99 (TTKSK) of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, detected in Uganda in 1998, has been recognized as a serious threat to food security because it possesses combined virulence to a large number of resistance genes found in current widely grown wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties and germplasm, leading to its potential for rapid spread and evolution. Since its initial detection, variants of the Ug99 lineage of stem rust have been discovered in Eastern and Southern African countries, Yemen, Iran, and Egypt. To date, eight races belonging to the Ug99 lineage are known. Increased pathogen monitoring activities have led to the identification of other races in Africa and Asia with additional virulence to commercially important resistance genes. This has led to localized but severe stem rust epidemics becoming common once again in East Africa due to the breakdown of race-specific resistance gene SrTmp, which was deployed recently in the 'Digalu' and 'Robin' varieties in Ethiopia and Kenya, respectively. Enhanced research in the last decade under the umbrella of the Borlaug Global Rust Initiative has identified various race-specific resistance genes that can be utilized, preferably in combinations, to develop resistant varieties. Research and development of improved wheat germplasm with complex adult plant resistance (APR) based on multiple slow-rusting genes has also progressed. Once only the Sr2 gene was known to confer slow rusting APR; now, four more genes-Sr55, Sr56, Sr57, and Sr58-have been characterized and additional quantitative trait loci identified. Cloning of some rust resistance genes opens new perspectives on rust control in the future through the development of multiple resistance gene cassettes. However, at present, disease-surveillance-based chemical control, largescale deployment of new varieties with multiple race-specific genes or adequate levels of APR, and reducing the cultivation of susceptible varieties in rust hot-spot areas remains the best stem rust management strategy.Hexaploid common wheat (Triticum aestivum) and tetraploid durum wheat (T. turgidum var. durum) are cultivated on more than 215 million hectares worldwide at a wide range of altitudes and latitudes, with a record estimated production by FAO of 725 million metric tons in 2014, up 7.6 million metric tons (or 1.1%) from the 2013 record level, providing approximately one-fifth of the calories and protein intake in humans (WHEAT 2014). The demand for wheat continues to increase at an annual rate of 1.6% and some estimates indicate that 60% more wheat will be needed by 2050 (WHEAT 2014).Stem rust, or black rust, caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, can occur wherever wheat is grown (Roelfs et al. 1992). Although not the most widespread or common among the wheat rusts, stem rust disease has the potential to cause the most damage when an epidemic occurs (Dean et al. 2012). Severe wheat stem rust epidemics occurred in the United States in 1919, 1920, 1923, 1927, 1935, 1953, and 1954(Roelfs 1978). Average statewide wheat yield losses during these epidemics were 25.4% in Minnesota,28.4% in North Dakota,and 19.3% in South Dakota. In contrast, since 1954, only localized epidemics have occurred in the United States and the rest of North America. The prevention of widespread stem rust attacks is attributed to the deployment of cultivars with combinations of multiple resistance genes and the removal of the alternate host of P. graminis f. sp. tritici, barberry (Berberis vulgaris) near wheat-growing regions (Kolmer et al. 1991).Worldwide, stem rust is mostly found in regions with a continental climate where summer temperatures regularly exceed 25°C. The disease has caused wheat losses during different historical periods in Canada (Kolmer 2001), the Southern Cone of South America (German et al. 2007), continental Europe, the Indian subcontinent, Australia (Park 2007), South Africa (Pretorius et al. 2007), East Africa (Wanyera et al. 2006), and China (Knott 1989;Roelfs et al. 1992).In 1998, a new race of stem rust fungus with a notably unique virulence to resistance gene Sr31 was found in Uganda and subsequently named Ug99 (Pretorius et al. 2000). Race-typing experiments using urediniospore samples identified Ug99 to be the race that caused the 2004 epidemics in Kenya (Wanyera et al. 2006) and suggested that it was likely the cause of preceding epidemics that occurred after 2002 in the country. Following the North American stem rust nomenclature system (Roelfs and Martens 1988), Ug99 was designated as TTKS (Wanyera et al. 2006). Evaluations of international breeding germplasm and varieties through seedling tests in greenhouse and field screening revealed that the Ug99 race possessed broad virulence to stem rust resistance genes, especially those predominant in varieties and breeding germplasm (Jin and Singh 2006;Jin et al. 2007;Pretorius et al. 2000;Singh et al. 2006). Although the TTKS race code appeared to be unique, this designation did not reflect one of the most unique characteristics of Ug99 and overlooked its virulence to resistance genes Sr31 and Sr38. This necessitated a revision of the North American stem rust nomenclature system and resulted in the addition of resistance genes Sr24, Sr31, Sr38, and SrMcN into the differential set (Jin et al. 2008). This led to the redesignation of race TTKS to TTKSK, which recognized virulence to Sr31 and Sr38, one of the most significant and unique virulence combinations known in P. graminis f. sp. tritici populations worldwide.Recognizing its potential threat to wheat production, 1970 Nobel Laureate Dr. Norman Borlaug raised the alarm and called for global action to fight the disease. The subsequent launch of the Borlaug Global Rust Initiative (BGRI) in 2005 led to a concerted international collaborative effort to combat the emerging threat of wheat rusts. A key component of BGRI is surveillance and monitoring, which has successfully tracked the evolution and spread of important stem rust races (Hodson et al. 2012).A series of reviews by Singh et al. (2006Singh et al. ( , 2008Singh et al. ( , 2011a) have documented the significance, emergence, evolution, and geographical spread of the Ug99 race group at regular intervals. In each review, an update on the latest known status of the Ug99 race group and highlights of all major changes since 2010 are provided. New emerging stem rust threats are also featured, along with an assessment of the current status of global rust monitoring systems, which were established in response to the Ug99 threat. Seven races, phenotypically recognized as a lineage, were identified until 2010 (Singh et al. 2011a), and these were distributed across nine countries in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Currently, there are eight confirmed races in the Ug99 lineage and these have been detected in 13 countries (unpublished data), indicating that the pathogen has continued to evolve and expand in geographical range. All known races in the Ug99 lineage and their key characteristics are shown in Table 1.Based on virulence phenotypes, it became evident that Ug99 should be regarded as a race group. One of the most intriguing races in the Ug99 race group is TTKSF, a member that is avirulent to Sr31. TTKSF was first detected in South Africa in 2000 (Boshoff et al. 2002) and was distinctive from local races based on its virulence to Sr8b and Sr38. Race TTKSF or its theoretical ancestor race PTKSF can be regarded as the most likely candidates as originators of this lineage if the Ug99 race complex resulted from asexual mutations. However, sexual recombination may have contributed to the evolution of the lineage because B. holstii, known to be susceptible to P. graminis f. sp. tritici, is present in proximity to wheat production areas in the highlands of eastern Africa (Y. Jin, unpublished). Isolates of P. graminis have been recovered from aecial infections in Ethiopia (G. Woldeab and Y. Jin, unpublished), indicating that B. holstii can serve as an alternate host in Ethiopia, and P. graminis is able to complete its life cycle.The latest race to be identified within the Ug99 lineage is TTKSF+ (Pretorius et al. 2012). It was detected in samples collected from South Africa and Zimbabwe in 2010 and identified as the result of the susceptibility of the South African 'Matlabas' wheat. The gene affected by TTKSF+ was characterized as Sr9h (Rouse et al. 2014a). Race TTKSF+ could be a single-step mutation of the existing race TTKSF, which was first identified in South Africa in 2000, then Zimbabwe (2009) and Uganda (2012). Although TTKSF+ was first reported in 2010, recent recharacterization of older South African isolates has shown virulence to Sr9h in a TTKSF culture collected in 2003, indicating that virulence existed much earlier than reported (Z. A. Pretorius, unpublished). Virulence to resistance gene Sr9h brings the total number of stem rust resistance genes known to be ineffective against the Ug99 race lineage to 34, whereas at least 39 genes remain effective, including several newly described stem rust resistance genes (Table 2), which is a positive news for breeding resistant varieties.The geographical distribution of the Ug99 race group has also expanded and the changing distribution over time is illustrated in Figure 1. The countries where Ug99 race group members have been identified include Egypt, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iran, Kenya, Mozambique, Rwanda, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. Of these countries, Egypt, Eritrea, Rwanda, and Mozambique have confirmed the presence of Ug99 lineage races since 2010. Egypt is the most recent country to confirm detection. Since 2010, specific races have been identified in an expanded range. Notably, race TTTSK (Ug99 + Sr36 virulence) was detected in three additional countries, including Ethiopia, Uganda, and Rwanda, and race PTKST (virulent on Sr24) was also detected in three additional countries, including Eritrea, Mozambique, and Zimbabwe. Detection of race TTKSF (avirulent on Sr31) in Uganda ( 2012) is also noteworthy because this race was previously identified only in southern Africa, which implies a connection between southern and eastern Africa epidemiological zones. Simple-sequence repeat (SSR) fingerprinting by Visser et al. (2009) showed that race TTKSF occurring in South Africa was significantly different from other existing non-Ug99 races; thus, it is a Race designation follows the North American nomenclature system described by Jin et al. (2008). Race TTKSF+ is given a temporary name because it exceeds the current North American 20-differential gene set.highly likely that the Ug99 lineage was a foreign introduction. In fact, the detection of TTKSF in Uganda once again supports the hypothesis of rust inoculum exchange between southern and eastern Africa. Additional samples of stem rust are currently undergoing analysis and it is likely that the pattern of continued evolution within the Ug99 lineage and geographical expansion will continue in the future.The global rust monitoring system established in response to the Ug99 threat is engaged in detecting and monitoring other races virulent to commercially important resistance genes, leading to the detection of various races with a broad geographic footprint. Those efforts led to the detection of RRTTF and TKTTF, two races with wide distribution throughout East Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia (Fig. 2). Race RRTTF was witnessed in Iran in 1997 and was still present in 2007 (Nazari and Mafi 2013). RRTTF is also present in Ethiopia (2007), Yemen (2007), andPakistan (2009). Admassu et al. (2009) reported a widely distributed race, RRTTR, in Ethiopia from stem rust samples collected during 2006 and 2007 based on a differential set described in Fetch and Dunsmore (2004) in which Sr24, Sr31, and Sr38 were not used. It is considered likely that the race reported by Admassu et al. (2009) was actually RRTTF hence this race was likely present in Ethiopia at least since 2006.Races similar to TKTTF occurred in Turkey in the 1990s and still predominate (Mert et al. 2012). They have also been detected in Iran (2010), Lebanon (2012), Ethiopia (2012), and Egypt (2013). This race group does not belong to the Ug99 lineage based on avirulences to Sr11 and Sr31 and molecular fingerprints (Olivera Firpo et al. in press). The presence of stem rust races with identical virulence profiles throughout this vast region implies that there are inoculum exchanges.In 2013, Ethiopia experienced localized but severe stem rust epidemics in the southern wheat production region and the epidemics continued into the 2014 crop season (Olivera Firpo et al. in press). Race analyses of samples from the epidemic regions detected race TKTTF to be the causal race behind these epidemics. Race TKTTF is highly virulent to the widely grown 'Digalu' wheat, which possesses resistance gene SrTmp that is effective against the Ug99 race group and ineffective against TKTTF. Through the global rust-monitoring system established by BGRI, not only was the causal race identified but also its dispersal patterns were elucidated and germplasm screening activities initiated to identify existing or new resistant cultivars.As discussed, available evidence indicates the strong likelihood of an origin and presence for race TKTTF in the Middle East region (Newcomb et al. 2013). The first confirmed detection of race TKTTF in Ethiopia was in August 2012 but the race remained at a low frequency and escaped further detection until early October 2013. By mid-November 2013, a severe epidemic on the most widely grown variety (Digalu) had started. This cultivar, despite resistance to the Ug99 race group and prevalent races of stripe rust, was highly susceptible to race TKTTF and suffered grain yield losses of up to 100% covered an area exceeding 10,000 ha. Despite an early warning, which led to a major national awareness campaign and extensive fungicide use, the absence of seed of varieties resistant to stem rust race TKTTF made effective control impossible in the 2014-15 growing season. Thousands of hectares were severely affected by the devastating epidemic. The enormous inoculum load poses a threat for future crops in Ethiopia and the surrounding region and also increases the risk of mutation and further evolution.Reports of stem rust in some fields of 'Robin', a variety released in 2011 and postulated to carry resistance gene SrTmp, emerged in the wheat crop sown in the 2014 off-season in Kenya. In the 2014 main crop season, some fields of Robin, especially those of small farmers, suffered significant losses, although losses to stem rust for large-scale farmers were limited due to the use of fungicides. Host reactions on International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) wheat breeding materials and checks possessing different resistance genes at Njoro indicate a likely evolution and selection of SrTmp virulence in the Ug99 lineage. Analyses are in progress to determine whether the stem rust outbreak on Robin in Kenya was due to race TKTTF or yet-to-be characterized variants of Ug99 with added virulence to SrTmp.Strong messages emerge from the Ethiopian TKTTF experience. The presence of a race in one region and incursion into a new region can have a devastating impact. The speed with which a stem rust epidemic can develop and spread is incredibly fast. Effective control of stem rust, especially under small-holder farming systems, is virtually impossible in the absence of resistant varieties. The current stem rust situation in Ethiopia reinforces the need for TABLE 2. Origin and usefulness of cataloged and temporarily designated Sr genes in conferring seedling or adult plant resistance to all Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici races belonging to the Ug99 lineage Stem rust resistance (Sr) genesTriticum aestivum a 5, 6,7a,7b,8a,8b,9a,9b,9f,9h,10,16,18,19,20,23,30,41,49,54,McN, Wld-1 15 a,b,c , 28 b , 29 c,d , 42 b,c , 48, 55 c,e , 56 c,e , 57 c,e , 58 c,e , Tmp (or Sha7) b,c , Huw234 b,c , ND643 c , Yaye c T. turgidum 9d, 9e, 9g, 11, 12, 17 2 c,e , 13 b,c , 14 effective global rust surveillance and monitoring, the critical need for the continued development and promotion of durable rust resistant varieties, and the diversification of varietal and cropping systems.A large proportion of the North American and CIMMYT durum wheat lines, selected for Ug99 resistance trials in Kenya in 2005, became susceptible when tested in a field stem rust nursery in Debre Zeit, Ethiopia, suggesting the presence of stem rust races that were virulent to the TTKSK-effective genes present in durum wheat germplasm. Race-typing studies identified two races, JRCQC and TRTTF, the latter also occurring in Yemen (Olivera et al. 2012). Both JRCQC and TRTTF possess virulence on stem rust resistance genes Sr13 and Sr9e, two genes constituting major components of stem rust resistance in North American and CIMMYT durum cultivars and germplasm. In addition to Sr9e and Sr13 virulence, race TRTTF is virulent to at least three stem rust resistance genes in 2005, 2008, 2010, and 2014. that are effective to race TTKSK, including Sr36, SrTmp, and a temporarily designated resistance gene Sr1RS (Amigo) located on 1AL.1RS rye translocation. Race TRTTF is the first known race with virulence to the stem rust resistance gene Sr1RS (Amigo), which represents one of the few genes effective against Ug99 race group in winter wheat cultivars from the United States. The presence of these races in Ethiopia led to the establishment of screening wheat materials, especially durum wheat, at the Debre Zeit field site in Ethiopia under the BGRI to identify resistant sources that can contribute to durum wheat improvement.In the last decade, DNA-based tools have begun to be used for population genetics studies of P. graminis f. sp. tritici. SSR markers were developed (Szabo 2007;Visser et al. 2011;Zhong et al. 2009) and used to examine regional P. graminis f. sp. tritici populations in Ethiopia (Admassu et al. 2010), South Africa (Visser et al. 2009), and the United States (Stoxen 2012). SSR markers were also used to differentiate the Ug99 race group from other P. graminis f. sp. tritici lineages (Jin et al. 2008(Jin et al. , 2009;;Visser et al. 2011). However, these SSR makers have not been very useful in differentiating different members of the Ug99 race group.Recently, the genome sequencing of a U.S. isolate of P. graminis f. sp. tritici (Duplessis et al. 2011) and the resequencing of several additional isolates provided a powerful tool for genetic studies and development of molecular diagnostic tools. A preliminary study in which 70 P. graminis f. sp. tritici isolates were resequenced demonstrated that the Ug99 race group, with 18 isolates representing 7 races, represents a single genetic lineage that has evolved relatively recently (L. J. Szabo and C. A. Cuomo, unpublished data). Using the genomic sequence data from this study, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostic method was developed for the Ug99 lineage (Szabo 2012). This assay is highly specific for the Ug99 genetic lineage and is able to discriminate between several of the members of the Ug99 race group (TTKST, TTKST, TTTSK, TTKSF, TTKSP, and PTKST/PTKSP). In addition, the development of this assay has identified multiple genotypes per race phenotype (L. J.Szabo, unpublished data). For example, four different genotypes have been identified within the race TTKSK. Currently, this assay is being used to monitor the movement and distribution of members of the Ug99 genetic lineage.The availability of an extensive single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) database for P. graminis f. sp. tritici has also facilitated the development of a high-throughput SNP assay (P. graminis f. sp. tritici SNP Chip) (L. J. Szabo and J. L. Johnson, unpublished data). This SNP assay was used to genotype isolates of race TKTTF collected from Ethiopia during the stem rust epidemic of 2013 to 2014 (Olivera Firpo et al. in press). Two distinct genetic types were identified within isolates of the TKTTF race group and it was discovered that these genetic types are part of the same genetic lineage that contains isolates of race RRTTF, a common race found in Ethiopia in recent years. However, the TKTTF/RRTTF lineage is very distinct from the Ug99 genetic lineage. At this point, the origin of the TKTTF genetic group is not clear, and genotyping of additional samples from Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia is needed for determining it.F. SP. TRITICI RACES Race-specific resistance genes. The broad virulence spectrum present in Ug99 and its derivatives has been implicated with partial to high susceptibility of numerous important wheat varieties sown on over 80 to 95% of total wheat area, as well as breeding materials, regardless of the originating countries (Singh et al. 2006(Singh et al. , 2008(Singh et al. , 2011b)). Virulences for resistance genes Sr24, Sr31, Sr36, and Sr38 were considered the most significant because these genes were providing resistance to other predominant P. graminis f. sp. tritici races and were present at a relatively high frequency in adapted wheat backgrounds. In all, 39 resistance genes continue to confer moderate to adequate resistance to the Ug99 race group; however, other races are known with virulence to 18 of these genes (Table 2). Moreover, several of the remaining effective genes were recently transferred to wheat from related genera and species that likely bring negative linkage drag present in the translocation. Development of successful commercial cultivars in the future will demonstrate their commercial utility. Genes Sr22, Sr25, Sr26, Sr33, Sr35, Sr45, and Sr50 are, at present, possibly the most useful race-specific resistance genes, provided that they are used in combinations. Some other temporarily designated genes (Table 2) that are common in highyielding wheat germplasm offer additional possibilities of gene combinations. If proper care in their deployment is not taken, then these genes are expected to lose effectiveness in eastern and southern Africa, where high populations of the Ug99 race group and other races exist each year. The \"boom-and-bust\" phenomenon was once again seen with the utilization of gene SrTmp (or SrSha7) in Digalu and Robin wheat in Ethiopia and Kenya, respectively. Recent studies (Ghazvini et al. 2012;Hiebert et al. 2011;Lopez-Vera et al. 2014a) have shown that Sr42, SrTmp, SrSha7, SrNini, and SrCad are colocated on chromosome arm 6DS; however, virulence to resistance gene SrTmp in Digalu and Robin shows that two different resistance genes, or alleles, are likely involved because temporarily designated resistance gene SrCad carried by Canadian 'AC Cadillac' wheat and breeding lines carrying SrNini remained resistant. Relationships between Sr42, SrCad, and SrNini need elucidation because all three map in the same region on chromosome arm 6DS.Adult plant resistance genes. Although adult plant resistance (APR) to stem rust has been known for a long time, Sr2 was the only well-studied gene. Sr2 and a linked or pleiotropic gene, Pbc, that conferred pseudo-black chaff (PBC) were transferred to hexaploid wheat 'Hope' and 'H44-24a' from tetraploid emmer wheat 'Yaroslav' by E. S. McFadden in the United States (McFadden 1930(McFadden , 1939). An independent transfer was also possibly made from 'Khapli' emmer by W. L. Waterhouse in Australia, who developed hexaploid wheat 'Khapstein'. Sr2 is known to confer modest APR that can be inadequate under high disease pressure; however, both semidwarf and tall wheat varieties with Sr2 and expressing high levels of resistance are also known (Hare and McIntosh 1979;McIntosh 1988;Njau et al. 2010;Rajaram et al. 1988;Singh and McIntosh 1986). Knott (1982) showed that an adequate level of multigenic resistance to stem rust was achieved by accumulating approximately five minor resistance genes of additive effects. This led to the use of the terminology \"Sr2-complex\" when a variety displays PBC in conjunction with high resistance levels because of the lack of genetic information on other contributing resistance genes. Increased emphasis on identifying and characterizing new sources of resistance to stem rust in the last decade led to various molecular mapping studies using biparental populations and association analyses. Yu et al. (2014) recently summarized results from various published studies, developed consensus maps, and identified several genomic regions that carry minor APR genes or quantitative trait loci (QTL). The most significant finding has been identifications of three pleiotropic APR genes-Sr55 (= Lr67/Yr46/Pm46), Sr57 (= Lr34/Yr18/Pm38/Sb1/Bdv1), and Sr58 (= Lr46/Yr29/ Pm39)-and a fourth gene, Sr56 (Bansal et al. 2014;Herrera-Foessel et al. 2014;Singh et al. 2012Singh et al. , 2013a)). Mapping studies using six CIMMYT semidwarf wheat varieties ('Kingbird', 'Kiritati', 'Pavon 76', 'Muu', 'Juchi', and 'Huiviris') with high levels of stem rust resistance in Kenya showed a continuous variation for stem rust severity in recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations and the presence of three to five QTL in each RIL population (Bhavani et al. 2011;Njau et al. 2013;Singh et al. 2013b). Interestingly, Sr2 was present in all resistant parents and was the most important APR gene conferring resistance to stem rust. Sr57 and Sr58 were also shown to confer APR along with other QTL. A recent study by Rouse et al. (2014b) using a biparental mapping population from the cross of durable APR-carrying but Sr2-lacking 'Thatcher' and Sr57carrying 'McNeal' showed the presence of three APR QTL on chromosome arms 3BS, 1AL, and 2BS in addition to Sr57 on 7DS. The 3BS QTL overlapped to the recessive seedling race-specific gene Sr12, a gene also transferred to hexaploid wheat from the tetraploid durum 'Iumillo' and known to be ineffective to the Ug99 race group. The Sr12 region was also implicated with APR in the Thatcher-derived U.S. 'Chris' wheat to an Australian P. graminis f. sp. tritici race (Singh and McIntosh 1987). However, whether Sr12 actually conferred APR, even though defeated, needs to be established, and the presence of a linked APR QTL cannot be ruled out.It is expected that accumulating multiple slow-rusting APR genes will result in wheat varieties that express high levels of durable stem rust resistance. This kind of resistance is especially important to curtail or reduce the evolution and survival of new virulent races in the East African highlands and other areas where wheat cultivation is continuous year round. High levels of APR to the Ug99 race group, identified in some semidwarf lines soon after the initiation of field screening in Kenya and Ethiopia (Njau et al. 2010;Singh et al. 2008), have allowed targeted breeding efforts to build this complex resistance in new breeding materials at CIMMYT.The emphasis toward phenotyping and breeding to identify and develop stem-rust-resistant wheat varieties increased during the last decade under the BGRI umbrella and supported by the Durable Rust Resistance in Wheat (DRRW) project. Over 350,000 and 87,000 wheat accessions that include released varieties, breeding materials, genetic resources, and mapping populations from up to 32 countries in a single year have been evaluated in Kenya and Ethiopia, respectively, at field sites at Njoro, Kenya (operated by the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, KALRO) and Debre Zeit, Ethiopia (operated by Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, EIAR) (Fig. 3). High emphasis is given to screening durum wheat at Debre Zeit due to the presence of races that overcome commonly present resistance genes in this species.A clear trend of increased resistance is evident in wheat germplasm screened at Kenya during the last 5 years (Fig. 4), with approximately 20% of entries showing good levels and another 20% showing intermediate levels of resistance on the average for all countries. To illustrate further, resistance to the Ug99 race group observed during the 2014 main season at Njoro field in wheat varieties and in advanced lines in registration trials from India, Pakistan, and Ethiopia indicated that 38.4, 56.7, and 69.4% of entries, respectively, showed high to moderate resistance (<30% disease severity) (Fig. 5). This level of resistance is expected to be sufficient for wheat-growing areas of India and Pakistan; however, for Ethiopia, 32.8% entries grouped under near-immune and resistant categories should be a better option for deployment because stem rust is present throughout the year in the highlands of East Africa, causing an early build up of diseases in favorable years.Resistance in wheat varieties and breeding materials from the United States of America. After the emergence of Ug99, a study by Jin and Singh (2006) assessed the level of resistance in U.S. wheat varieties to Ug99 and found that though 93 and 94% of the hard-red spring wheat varieties assessed were resistant to the two most virulent P. graminis f. sp. tritici races present in the United States, only 16% varieties were considered resistant to the original Ug99 race TTKSK. Resistant hard-red spring wheat varieties possessed stem rust resistance genes Sr24 or SrTmp and included 'Ember', 'Guard', 'Ivan', 'Keene', and 'Stoa', and were released prior to 2000. Since 2006, wheat breeders throughout the United States have assessed their advanced breeding lines for field stem rust response at the field site in Njoro, Kenya and for seedling stem rust responses to a select array of P. graminis f. sp. tritici races, including the Ug99 race group, at the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) Cereal Disease Laboratory (CDL). As a result of this work, two spring wheat varieties, 'Tom' (Anderson et al. 2012) and 'Linkert', released by the University of Minnesota in 2008 and 2013, respectively, exhibited APR to the Ug99 race group.Screening of 174 U.S. spring wheat varieties and breeding lines in 2013 indicated that only 4% were resistant as seedlings to race TTKSK (Fig. 6). When the same germplasm was screened with P. graminis f. sp. tritici races TRTTF and TKTTF, only two breeding lines displayed seedling resistance to all three races. Field screening at Njoro and Debre Zeit combined with the seedling responses indicated that 4.6% of the lines displayed susceptible infection types to race TTKSK and exhibited an average disease severity of less than 30% across the four seasons (Fig. 6).Stem rust has historically not caused severe yield losses in winter wheat in the United States. In total, 48% of hard red winter wheat and 27% of soft red winter wheat cultivars and breeding lines were demonstrated to be resistant to race TTKSK (Jin and Singh 2006). Genes conferring resistance included Sr24, Sr36, SrTmp, and Sr1RS (Amigo). The emergence of races TTKST and TTTSK in the Ug99 lineage with additional virulences to Sr24 and Sr36, in addition to race TRTTF with virulence to SrTmp and Sr1RS (Amigo), suggests that nearly all U.S. winter wheat is susceptible to at least one of the P. graminis f. sp. tritici races detected in Africa or Asia in the last decade.U.S. researchers have made substantial progress in developing molecular markers linked to available Ug99 resistance genes, identification of new Ug99 resistance genes, and facilitation of foreign disease-screening nurseries. However, U.S. wheat breeders appear to have not succeeded thus far in selecting Ug99 resistance, with few exceptions (e.g., Tom and Linkert). Emphasis on improving grain yield, abiotic stress tolerance, protein content, processing quality, and resistance to diseases or races that are already present in the United States are likely to be high priorities for U.S. wheat breeders.Breeding for stem rust resistance in CIMMYT's international spring wheat germplasm. The improved spring wheat germplasm developed each year by CIMMYT in Mexico is distributed worldwide annually through international trials and nurseries. These trials and nurseries are grown by cooperators in both public and private sectors and are used as sources of new genetic diversity for various traits of interest. National breeding programs in Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and southern European countries also select adapted lines for direct release as varieties. This flagship breeding program was initiated during the mid-1940s by Dr. Norman Borlaug, who introduced shuttle breeding to shorten breeding time by growing segregating populations and other breeding materials twice each year at two distinct field sites, Ciudad Obregon and Toluca, in Mexico. This selection scheme also exposed breeding materials to two very distinct climatic conditions and multiple diseases of global importance and gave rise to widely adapted and input-responsive semidwarf varieties that triggered what subsequently became known as the \"Green Revolution\". In the post-Green Revolution period, new spring wheat germplasm developed in Mexico has resulted in several successful varieties grown in large areas in many countries (Lantican et al. 2005). Wheat lines identified as resistant to Ug99 (Njau et al. 2010) in field screening since 2005 have been distributed worldwide since 2007 as sequentially numbered \"Stem Rust Resistance Screening Nurseries\" (SRRSN) after verifying the resistance through repeated field testing at Njoro and seedling phenotyping at biosafety greenhouses at the USDA-ARS CDL. Considering the continued importance of CIMMYT wheat germplasm in enhancing the productivity and sustainability of wheat in eastern Africa and other regions where Ug99 race group was identified and predicted to migrate through wind trajectories (Singh et al. 2008(Singh et al. , 2011a)), a targeted breeding effort was initiated in 2006 to develop highyielding spring wheat germplasm by utilizing a \"Mexico-Kenya shuttle-breeding scheme\" that allows growing and selecting segregating materials in Mexico and Njoro, Kenya twice a year (Singh et al. 2011b). Lines identified as Ug99 resistant in 2005 and 2006 and other sources of Ug99-effective race-specific resistance genes were used as donors of resistance and crossed with highyielding materials. A high emphasis was given to building APR because some wheat lines with high levels of APR could be identified soon after screening was initiated (Njau et al. 2010), and it also became obvious that Ug99 was evolving and continuing to add new virulences.Approximately 1,800 F 3 /F 4 generation populations are currently selected at Njoro, Kenya during the off-season (January to May) under high stem rust pressure. The resulting F 4 /F 5 populations are then sown again at Njoro in the main season for another round of selection. The advanced lines derived from these populations are brought back to Njoro from Mexico for phenotyping during three to four seasons. The most resistant lines are also phenotyped with Ug99 and other select arrays of races at the seedling stage by CDL. All data for various traits, generated over 2 years, are used in selecting approximately 600 of the best lines that are then distributed internationally through targeted yield trials and screening nurseries. The highest recorded stem rust severity data during the four seasons of screening is used to give a final resistance rating to wheat lines that carry APR, and we also postulate racespecific resistance genes effective against the Ug99 lineage in case distributed lines carry them. Seedling phenotyping data combined with pedigree and linked molecular marker (if available) information are used in postulating race-specific resistance genes in wheat lines distributed internationally.The first group of high-yielding wheat lines derived from targeted breeding was distributed internationally in 2011, and subsequent distribution has continued since then (Singh et al. 2011a,b). A summary of resistance to the Ug99 race group in 656 wheat lines to be distributed in 2015 as international yield trials and screening nurseries is given in Table 3. The ninth SRRSN, distributed for sowing in the 2014-15 crop season in various countries, included 235 of the most resistant lines based on three seasons of screening. Approximately half of the 656 lines possessed high to moderate levels of APR. Lines with \"near-immune resistant\" (NIR), \"resistant\" (R), and \"resistant to moderately resistant\" (R-MR) resistance categories (i.e., maximum recorded stem rust severities of 1, 5 to 10, and 15 to 20%, respectively) are better candidates for grain-yield performance evaluation and further stem rust testing at field sites in the eastern African highlands for identifying varieties that combine high yields with high and stable APR. Some lines are already in advanced stages of national varietal performance testing (Fig. 5). In wheat-growing regions where stem rust is not endemic, wheat lines with resistance categories \"moderately resistant\" (MR) and \"moderately resistant to moderately susceptible\" (MR-MS), with highest stem rust severities of 30 and 40%, respectively, are likely to confer adequate resistance. Using these lines enhances the possibility of identifying varieties with increased yield potential, resistance to other important diseases, climate resilience, and preferred processing quality.The presence of various race-specific resistance genes was also postulated and found to be present in 21.5% of the lines (Table 3). Temporarily designated resistance genes SrND643, SrHuw234, SrYaye, and SrNini were mapped on chromosome arms 4AL, 2BL, 2BS, and 6DS (Basnet et al. 2015;Lopez-Vera et al. 2014b;Yu et al. 2014) but others need further studies to determine if they are different. These genes are associated with inconsistent seedling reactions and disease severities ranging from low to intermediate on wheat lines carrying them, indicating that their expression is enhanced in the presence of APR genes. This complicates their precise phenotyping in mapping populations; however, their combinations with APR genes could be developed by selecting plants with lower disease severities and reduced infection types. Resistance gene SrTmp was effective until 2014 off season to P. graminis f. sp. tritici races used for screening at Njoro. However, in the 2014 main season, virulence to SrTmp was well distributed in field nurseries and the reaction of several SrTmp-carrying wheat lines, including popular variety Robin, changed. In all, 61 lines, previously postulated to carry SrTmp, showed varying levels of APR in resistance categories R (2 lines), R-MR (4 lines), MR (7 lines), MR-MS (8 lines), MS (21 lines), MS-S (13 lines), and S (6 lines), supporting the previously reported results by Singh et al. (2011a) that APR genes enhance the expression of moderately effective race-specific resistance genes such as SrTmp (= SrSha7). Hiebert et al. (2011) reported the enhancement of field resistance conferred by SrCad in the presence of pleiotropic APR gene Sr57/Lr34 in Canadian AC Cadillac wheat. Therefore it is recommended that molecular-marker-assisted incorporation of race-specific resistance genes should be done in conjunction with field-based phenotyping.A relatively small but increasing number of rust resistance genes have been cloned from wheat and other plant species (Table 4). All race-specific rust resistance genes cloned to date encode proteins containing an N-terminal nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain coupled to a C-terminal domain consisting of a series of degenerate leucine-rich repeat (LRR) motifs. An overly simplistic but nevertheless appropriate model of resistance protein function is that the LRR motif is primarily involved in pathogen recognition while the N-terminal domain is involved in activating a plant defense response. These NBS-LRR proteins are common to all land plant species and provide resistance to a diverse array of fungal, bacterial, viral, and insect pathogens (Yue et al. 2012).The six race-specific, NBS-LRR wheat rust resistance genes cloned (Lr1, Lr10, Lr21, Sr33, Sr35, and Yr10) confer a spectrum of resistance specificities even though they encode the same class of protein. Currently, there is insufficient information to predict whether an NBS-LRR protein will confer a broad or narrow spectrum of rust resistance or which rust pathogens species it will recognize based upon protein sequence. It is noteworthy that the Sr33 stem rust resistance gene is a homolog of the Mla powdery mildew resistance gene family first described in barley and later in the diploid A genome of wheat (Jordan et al. 2011;Seeholzer et al. 2010;Wei et al. 2002). It has been suggested that other members of the Mla/Sr33 gene family are also likely to encode Sr31 and Sr50 based upon genetic colocalization of Mla/Sr33 homologs and these two resistance specificities (Periyannan et al. 2013). Thus, it appears that diversification of a single NBS-LRR gene family in wheat and its relatives can provide resistance to at least two pathogen species, one of which is a rust pathogen. All six cloned, race-specific wheat rust resistance genes have related gene members elsewhere in the wheat genome or in at least one of the diploid progenitors of bread wheat. Whether some of these other NBS-LRR gene homologs also confer additional resistances like the Mla/Sr33 family is unknown.Lr1, Lr21, Sr33, Sr35, and Yr10 resistance specificities are each encoded by a single NBS-LRR gene; however, Lr10 resistance is conferred by a pair of adjacent NBS-LRR genes, each required for function (Loutre et al. 2009). Several disease resistances in other plant species are also encoded by two tandemly inverted NBS-LRR genes. The products of these gene pairs often interact by forming dimers, with one member involved in pathogen recognition whereas the other is involved in plant defense signaling (Cesari et al. 2014). With more than 150 rust resistance genes cataloged in wheat as race specific, it is likely that the majority of these genes will also encode NBS-LRR proteins. Sophisticated methodologies have been developed that enable all NBS-LRR genes present in a plant genome to be sequenced. When coupled with mutagenesis, these strategies are likely to greatly accelerate the discovery of additional wheat rust resistances that are encoded by NBS-LRR genes and, therefore, bypass tedious, conventional map-based cloning approaches (Jupe et al. 2013;Wulff and Moscou 2014).Unlike race-specific seedling resistances, various APR genes confer partial or slow-rusting phenotypes at the adult plant stage of development. Some APR genes are race specific while others recognize all rust pathogen races (i.e., race nonspecific). Two racenonspecific APR genes have been cloned from wheat, and the obvious difference in APR resistance phenotypes, compared with seedling resistance phenotypes, is paralleled by APR genes encoding entirely different proteins. The first APR gene to be cloned, Lr34/Yr18/Sr57/Pm38/Sb1/Bdv1 (hereafter referred to as Lr34), confers adult-plant race-nonspecific resistance to six pathogen species. The predicted Lr34 protein is a 12-transmembrane domain ABC transporter that transports an unknown substrate that presumably confers disease resistance (Krattinger et al. 2009).The protein encoded by the resistance gene differs from that of the susceptibility allele by just two amino acids; however, such apparently minor differences have been shown to result in significant changes in substrate transport of other ABC-transporter proteins.The second wheat APR gene to be cloned is the Yr36 gene. This gene, derived from T. turgidum subsp. dicoccides, provides partial APR to all wheat stripe rust pathogen races tested and, unlike Lr34, is associated with plant cell death at rust infection sites (Fu et al. 2009). The Yr36 protein contains a functional N-terminal serine-threonine kinase domain fused to a predicted steroidogenic acute regulatory protein-related lipid transfer (START) domain (Fu et al. 2009). This latter domain has been implicated in lipid trafficking, metabolism, and sensing, while binding of START domain proteins to sterols and ceramides causes protein conformational changes. The fusion of a kinase to a possible lipid receptor suggests that this protein may be involved in a lipid-based signaling response, although there is currently no evidence to support this model. Unlike Lr34, the Yr36 gene has not been used extensively in agriculture; therefore, its long-term durability is unknown.Colonization of plant cells by rust infection involves the insertion of haustoria into mesophyll cells. Many, possibly hundreds, of small secreted proteins called effectors are released from the fungal haustorium and enter the plant cytoplasm and are believed to suppress plant basal defense mechanisms and alter plant cell homeostasis for the pathogen's benefit (Giraldo and Valent 2013;Rafiqi et al. 2010). NBS-LRR proteins recognize, either directly or indirectly, the invasive action of a single, specific fungal effector protein (a recognized effector is known as an avirulence protein), whereupon a defense response is activated, often leading to a hypersensitive cell death response. The flax rust pathogen Melampsora lini is the only rust species for which effectors with demonstrated avirulence activity have been characterized and interaction with a cognate NBS-LRR protein demonstrated (Dodds et al. 2006;Ravensdale et al. 2011).A single pathogen effector protein is dispensable, presumably due to redundancy, which enables rapid changes in pathogen avirulence by mutation or loss of recognized effectors. Consistent with this molecular model of rapid pathogen avirulence loss is the inherent lack of durability of NBS-LRR resistance genes, particularly when deployed singularly. To counter rapid pathogen change, plant NBS-LRR proteins also evolve rapidly by sequence diversification and intergenic recombination (Michelmore and Meyers 1998). Therefore, a constant counter evolution of new pathogen races and new plant resistance gene specificities occurs in a molecular coevolutionary \"arms race\" (Maor and Shirasu 2005).The increasing number of cloned wheat rust resistance genes now makes stacking of multiple resistance genes together on a small chromosomal region in wheat a real possibility using plant transgenesis. These cis-gene stacks would greatly simplify future breeding efforts and prevent the single gene deployment of rustresistance genes. A second major advance that has potentially enabled production of cis-gene stacks in wheat is the development of a highly efficient Agrobacterium-mediated wheat transformation system (Ishida et al. 2014;Richardson et al. 2014). However, wheat rust resistance genes are generally large (8 to 16 kb), making the production of very large multigene constructs and subsequent transgenic plants technically challenging. Nonetheless, these experiments are being attempted and it is imperative that more wheat rust resistance genes are cloned to increase potential gene combinations available for cis-gene stacks.To maintain the durability of a cis-gene stack, it is essential that individual resistance genes within the stack are not deployed singularly, resulting in the erosion of the resistances present at the multigene locus. This caveat is probably more applicable to racespecific genes rather than APR genes. It is difficult to prevent deployment of single genes that are already present in wheat or which can be easily introgressed by conventional breeding. However, intellectual property protection can provide restrictions on the use of cloned genes in transgenic material. Consequently, future cis-gene stacks are likely to consist of trans-genes cloned from other plant species that are not sexually compatible with wheat and the only means of introducing these genes is via transgenesis. Potentially, these resistance genes may be derived from both hosts and nonhosts of cereal rust fungi (Bettgenhaeuser et al. 2014). The challenge of cis-gene stacks is not restricted to resistance genes and the increasing number of agronomically beneficial transgenes makes the development of gene-stacking technologies a biotechnological imperative (Que et al. 2010). a NBS-LRR = nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat and START = steroidogenic acute regulatory protein-related lipid transfer.Continuing the understanding of the molecular basis of rust disease is also likely to lead to new disease resistance strategies. Very little is known about the host cell targets of cereal rust effector proteins. However, in other pathosystems, modifications of the plant components targeted by pathogen effector molecules can generate novel resistance. For example, the bacterial pathogen of rice Xanthomonas oryzae produces an effector that acts as a transcription factor that specifically targets and upregulates the endogenous rice sugar transporter gene OsSweet14. Modification of this endogenous rice gene with site-specific nucleases prevents effector binding to the OsSweet14 promoter and results in enhanced disease resistance (Li et al. 2012). However, this type of novel resistance strategy will require a much greater understanding of wheat rust effectors and their cognate plant targets for future development in wheat.The spread of the Ug99 race group of stem rust in Eastern and Southern Africa and beyond has brought stem rust research and development activities back onto the international wheat improvement agenda under the BGRI. Significant progress was made in pathogen surveillance, field screening of global wheat germplasm, identifying diverse race-specific and APR resistance genes, cloning of rust resistance genes, breeding rust resistant varieties, and training wheat scientists. Existing varieties with resistance were identified and new varieties with race-specific or APRs were released in various countries. A decade of breeding at CIMMYT has started to deliver new, high-yielding wheat germplasm resistant to races belonging to the Ug99 lineage and other important races identified recently in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Chemicals remain an option for emergency control and are being used in eastern Africa; however, their large-scale use by small farmers is neither feasible nor economical. Therefore, success in controlling stem rust is likely to be achieved in Africa when new high-yielding varieties with a high level of durable resistance are widely grown and susceptible varieties are simultaneously removed from farmers' fields. This will require a concerted effort by researchers working in different disciplines and agencies responsible for varietal releases, seed multiplication, and their distribution and promotion. International developmental agencies interested in food security and the income of small farmers in Africa can play a crucial role in achieving sustainable stem rust control by supporting the abovementioned activities, which should also help mitigate the stem rust threat in other wheat-growing regions."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1330929914.json b/main/part_2/1330929914.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a32c415ae359b6ea4ad146b2d2efee92c988841b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1330929914.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4d023c53f3d6bf3318e9c066de55225a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/703d9888-0b01-4e84-8431-3663ed0f4701/retrieve","id":"1675459997"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"677bc541-e0f9-473f-8e91-dcc0ac0c35ea","content":"Se establecieron 6 escuelas de campo para formar a productores de papa en temas de manejo del tizón tardío y entrenamiento en el uso de la aplicación PlantVillage NURU. Las escuelas de campo Intibucá se establecieron con productores y productoras de AMIR (en Malguara), MISION TAIWAN Y DICTA (Pueblo viejo), JJ-AGRO (El Tabor, El Cacao, Chiligatoro y Manazapa). El programa de escuelas de campo desarrollado por CETC-IL en Intibucá estuvo compuesto por 5 sesiones en las cuales se registró la participación de 80 productores (41 hombres y 39 mujeres) que participaron en al menos 1 sesión de escuela de campo y de estos 45 productores (25 hombres y 20 mujeres) que dieron seguimiento continuo al participar en 3 o más de las sesiones de escuelas de campo.Se establecieron dos parcelas de escuelas de campo (Tabla 1) con la finalidad de que los productores participantes de las ECAs utilizaran la herramienta de apoyo a la toma de decisiones bajo los sistemas de manejo de sus parcelas. Estas parcelas se implementaron con AMIR (en Malguara) bajo un sistema de manejo semi orgánico y con DICTA y MISION TAIWAN (en Pueblo viejo) bajo un sistema de manejo convencional.Se establecieron dos parcelas experimentales en 4 localidades del municipio de Intibucá (Tabla 2). La parcela experimental 1 tuvo como finalidad evaluar la susceptibilidad al tizón tardío (Phytophthora infestans) de 6 variedades de papa (DICTA-Jicaramaní, DICTA-Purén, Fábula, Bellini, Soprano, y Faluka) frecuentemente utilizadas en Honduras. La parcela experimental 2 tuvo como finalidad adaptar una herramienta de apoyo a la toma de decisiones utilizando dos variedades de papa (Bellini y DICTA-Jicaramaní) para disminuir el número de aplicaciones en el manejo del tizón tardío bajo las condiciones locales. Los principales resultados de las parcelas experimentales de investigación se evidencian en las tablas 3, 4 y 5.Se colectaron 247 muestras de tizón en los departamentos de Intibucá, Lempira, Ocotepeque, La Paz y Francisco Morazán de las cuales actualmente se están analizando 200 en el laboratorio de fitopatología del Centro Internacional de la papa (CIP) en Perú. La finalidad de esta actividad fue colectar muestras de hojas infectadas por Phytophthora infestans, para transferir los micelios a tarjetas FTA para su genotipado.Se colectaron 200 fotografías de los síntomas causados por el psílido de la papa (Bactericera cockerelli) con la finalidad de incluir estas fotos en la base de datos de la aplicación PlantVillage NURU para que la aplicación ayude a diagnosticar la enfermedad de paratrioza.Tabla 1. Descripción de las parcelas de escuelas de campo establecidas por CETC-IL en Intibucá. Tabla 2. Descripción de las parcelas experimentales establecidas por CETC-IL en Intibucá. Tabla 3. Valores de escala de susceptibilidad obtenidas por variedades de papa cultivadas en Honduras en un ciclo de cultivo 2022. La herramienta de toma de decisiones controló el tizón tardío en la variedad Bellini con menos aplicaciones de fungicidas que la práctica común de los agricultores, lo cual implica una reducción de costos cercano al 50% en el uso de fungicidas, sin embargo, los cálculos de impacto ambiental indicaran el menor riesgo para los aplicadores, sus familias y la del medioambiente.Tabla 5. Comparación del manejo integrado del tizón tardío de la papa en la variedad DICTA Jicaramaní evaluado mediante la severidad (rAUDPC), y el número de aplicaciones de fungicidas empleadas en las parcelas experimentales de validación de la herramienta de toma de decisiones. Durante el primer año del proyecto CETC-IL en Honduras todas las actividades se trabajaron exitosamente con las organizaciones locales. El tizón tardío fue controlado por la herramienta de toma de decisiones con menor número de aplicaciones de fungicidas que la práctica común de los agricultores, sin embargo, los rendimientos fueron bajos en todos los tratamientos (datos no mostrados) debido a que esta variedad tiene un mayor ciclo fenológico y debido a su susceptibilidad demostrada en experimentos fue afectada en las épocas de formación de tubérculos. Esto conlleva a recomendar que los organismos nacionales puedan iniciar trabajos de adaptación de clones y variedades provenientes de programas de mejoramiento que tengan como características la precocidad, resistencia al tizón tardío y características para su uso en procesamiento industrial (papas fritas u horneadas).Adicionalmente, esta primera experiencia entrenando a productores en el uso de la aplicación plantVillage NURU en Honduras evidenció que se debe mejorar la inteligencia artificial de la aplicación a fin de que sea más precisa a la hora de identificar no solo los síntomas de la enfermedad del tizón tardío si no también los síntomas de otras enfermedades y plagas que afectan el cultivo de la papa. De igual manera para las siguientes fases del proyecto se recomienda involucrar en las diversas actividades de CETC-IL una cantidad igual de hombres y mujeres para dar espacio a una participación más equitativa en términos de género."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1338995536.json b/main/part_2/1338995536.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45c87298631e5c75d339df6901e143cf6247c18f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1338995536.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"123f44c3a22cf0d131da27f16d46ea9d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1ce0e7bd-6a54-46ad-9759-31629222f248/retrieve","id":"-265345486"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a287d65e-88ef-497d-bbdd-49297bcbcc9f","content":"With global prices soaring, alternatives to chemical fertilisers can be a big help for small farmers. Our authors present two schemes for locally sourced fertiliser in the State of Odisha in India.For years, small-scale producers around the world have been threatened by rising fertiliser prices. In 2020 there were supply chain disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and natural disasters. This year, consequences of the Russia -Ukraine crisis exacerbated the situation. Prices surged in the beginning of the crisis because exports of fuel and fertiliser were nearly at a standstill and the production and movement of nitrogen in Eastern Europe was significantly curtailed. In more recent months, prices have dropped due to a variety of factors. In July, the United Nations brokered a 120-day agreement called the Black Sea Grain Initiative between Russia, Ukraine, and Turkey that reintroduced food and fertiliser exports. Also, in reaction to the high cost of fertiliser, farmers around the world are delaying its purchase, which is driving demand down. Nevertheless, fertiliser prices are still higher than a year ago and remain unstable due to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and uncertainties about the legalities of conducting business with Russia. The United Nations recently warned that \"the current crisis of affordability will turn into a crisis of availability\".One way for small-scale producers to mitigate the shocks in global fertiliser markets is to use locally sourced alternatives. Supported by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), the Odisha Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group Empowerment and Livelihood Project (OPELIP) in Odisha, India, is encouraging producers to do just that. Odisha is one of the poorest states in India. It is also home to the largest number of particularly vulnerable tribal groups. The agriculture they practice makes use of basic farming techniques, and they rely entirely on rain to feed their crops. Malnutrition is unfortunately common in the population, especially in children, and they experience high rates of related conditions like underweight and anaemia.OPELIP's goal is to empower and improve the livelihoods of these vulnerable tribal groups through a variety of interventions. One of them is the use of home gardens, which involves teaching participants how to grow vegetables and fruits in gardens next to their homes. As part of this intervention, OPELIP taught farmers how to make and use two alternatives to chemical fertilisers that can be produced locally, with just a few common ingredients. One, called Jeevamruta, is an organic manure and bio-pesticide that has been in use for centuries. It is made by fermenting cow dung, cow urine, jaggery (a traditional, unrefined sugar), pulses, flour, soil and water for one week. The result is a natural source of nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, and other micronutrients that is suitable for all crops. It also helps maintain the soil's acidity level, improves aeration and boosts plant growth and yield. The other, called vermicompost, takes longer than Jeevamruta to prepare, but it serves as a rich natural source of organic nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. A wide variety of biodegradable materials can be used as ingredients, but in OPELIP's case, participants were taught how to use a combination of food waste, water and bedding materials. Earthworms are then added to the mixture, which is processed for 40 to 50 days. The end result is a product called vermicast, which contains water-soluble nutrients ideal for plants. \"Previously, beneficiaries were cultivating in a traditional way, and they left the fields alone. Now, we are teaching them how to get more crop by applying Jeevamruta, Nimastra, and other organic pesticides for better yield and soil fertility,\" an OPELIP agricultural officer explains. \"Equipped with the right knowledge and practical experience, households from these tribal groups are now increasing their ability to cultivate fruits and vegetables for household consumption, improving their nutritional intake and creating income-generating opportunities through the sale of surplus crops.\"With fertiliser from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus accounting for about ten per cent of India's total fertiliser imports, prices across the country are expected to increase for the foreseeable future. But when small-scale producers are able to rely on their own knowledge and resources to produce alternatives, they are better equipped to both face short-term shocks like rising prices and build sustainable, resilient food systems over the long term. An OPELIP frontline worker teaching participants how to make Jeevamruta in Duipani village, Odisha, India.Photo: OPELIP"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1339064226.json b/main/part_2/1339064226.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7670e789e82f1ff246dc54e37893efe307893cbe --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1339064226.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"15b9c8a1bf4c42ade978efc1cce0b976","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e3b66aa9-f416-4369-8cbd-e656ac0b27ec/retrieve","id":"1562584143"},"keywords":["combining ability","drought","low soil nitrogen","stress tolerance","Striga hermonthica","testcrosses","Zea mays L Annor B","Badu-Apraku B","Nyadanu D","Akromah R","Fakorede MAB. Identifying heterotic groups"],"sieverID":"f46fdc07-87d0-4f91-a9eb-9d788a82eb5c","content":"Maize (Zea mays) is a major source of food for human consumption and livestock production. It is also used as a raw material for many agro-allied industries in the world (Undie, Uwah, & Attoe, 2012). In West Africa (WA), maize production has been increasing steadily over the years due to its wide adaptation and uses. However, its production is characterized by low grain yield (1.8 t/ha) compared with the yields obtained in other parts of the world (FAOSTAT 2008(FAOSTAT , 2012(FAOSTAT , 2016;;Sserumaga et al., 2014). This situation is partly due to the non-availability of high-yielding hybrids with tolerance to drought and low nitrogen (low N) in the soil, and resistance to infestation of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. Hybrids revolutionized maize production in developed countries during 1930-1950 but have not been widely adopted in most sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Adoption of hybrid maize by farmers in many developingcountries has been very slow, although it has now been increasing gradually in SSA.An important requirement for the development of high-yielding commercial hybrids is the availability of information on the heterotic groups and patterns of the available inbred lines in a breeding programme (Barata & Carena, 2006;Fan et al., 2018). Globally, inbred lines and the derived commercial hybrids resulting from them must be stress tolerant. Stresses common to all SSA countries include drought and low N and infestation by parasitic weeds such as Striga hermonthica, especially in WCA. Classification of inbred lines into heterotic groups under the different environmental conditions has been initiated by several researchers in SSA (Agbaje, Badu-Apraku, & Fakorede, 2008;Badu-Apraku, Fakorede, et al., 2015;Badu-Apraku et al., 2013;Menkir, Badu-Apraku, Thé, & Adepoju, 2003) but limited success has been achieved. Taking a cue from the experience and the standards attained over a long time by the USA maize breeders, heterotic grouping of inbred lines has to be a continuous exercise in maize breeding programmes. Heterotic groups and testers for the newly developed or introduced set of inbred lines in a breeding program must be determined (Barata & Carena, 2006;Fan et al., 2018;Fan, Tan, Yang, & Chen, 2004). Additionally, it is important for any successful or effective breeding programme aimed at developing outstanding drought, low N and Striga resistant hybrids to assess the heterotic groups under individual stress, non-stress (optimum), and across environments.The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan-Nigeria, in collaboration with the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) in Kenya and with national programmes, has for years been developing and releasing OPVs in all maturity groups and hybrids in the late and intermediate groups but it is only recently that a few stress-tolerant/resistant early and extra-early hybrids have been developed and released in some WCA countries. However, maize researchers have consistently observed that the performance of early (90-95 days to physiological maturity) and extra-early (80-85 days to physiological maturity) yellow maize OPVs and hybrids lag grossly behind their white counterparts in SSA because for a long time research emphasis on maize had been on the white endosperm maize. However, recently, there has been increased research emphasis on the use of yellow endosperm maize because of the high demand for the poultry industry and for human consumption to address vitamin A deficiencies. The yellow maize is preferred for poultry feed because it imparts the yellow colour to the egg yolk and contributes to human nutrition. Therefore, it is imperative to identify the heterotic groups of the newly developed or introduced early maturing yellow maize inbred lines so that they could be successfully used for the development of high-yielding hybrids and synthetic varieties for commercialization in SSA. Hybrid maize varieties are preferred by progressive farmers in SSA due to the high yield compared to OPVs (Ayinde, Fola, & Ibrahim, 2011;Correjado & Magulama, 2008) and uniformity in growth and other agronomically desirable characteristics.Results of the attempts by maize breeders to identify the most efficient heterotic grouping methods have not been consistent. For example, Fan, Miles, Takahashi, and Yao (2009) and Badu-Apraku, Fakorede, et al. (2015) compared the specific combining ability (SCA) of several lines using molecular markers and the heterotic group's specific and general combining ability (HSGCA) methods and found the HSGCA method to be the most efficient based on the breeding efficiency (the average of the proportion of total inter-heterotic group hybrids that is due to superior high-yielding inter-heterotic group hybrids plus the proportion of total low-yielding intra-heterotic group hybrids that is due to the low-yielding intra-heterotic group hybrids). In contrast, Badu-Apraku, Annor, et al. (2015), Badu-Apraku, Fakorede, Talabi, et al. (2016) reported the heterotic grouping based on molecular markers as the most efficient in a study involving early maturing quality protein maize (QPM) inbred lines.The contrasting results reported have been attributed to the differences in the genetic materials used (Badu-Apraku, Fakorede, Gedil, et al., 2016). It is therefore of utmost importance to classify the newly developed early maturing maize inbred lines using the most efficient grouping method to identify the best set of new inbred lines for effective use in maize breeding programmes.Another important requirement of any successful maize breeding programme is the availability of efficient testers, which could effectively discriminate and classify inbred lines into appropriate heterotic groups for the development of high-yielding hybrids and synthetic varieties. An effective tester should be able to rank inbred lines correctly for performance in hybrid combinations and increase the differences between testcrosses for efficient discrimination (Rawlings & Thompson, 1962) Note: (TZEI 11 × TZEI 8) S 7 inb 18-1/3-1/2-1/1 = TZEI 415 was developed from a cross between TZEI 11 × TZEI 8, taken through seven cycles of inbreeding (S 7 ) and was the 18th line selected after the first cycle (S 1 ) of inbreeding. This was followed by several cycles of repeated selfing and selection at the different stages of inbreeding. 1).The S1). The low N fields at both locations were depleted of N by growing maize continuously at high density for several years and removing the biomass after each harvest. Soil samples taken from 0 to 15 cm depth before field preparation were analysed for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) contents at the IITA analytical services laboratory, Ibadan, Nigeria, following the Kjeldahl digestion and colorimetric methods (Bremner & Mulvaney, 1982). The Mokwa soil contained 0.033% of N, 4.11 mg/kg of P and 0.14 cmol/kg of K while that of Ile-Ife had 0.081% of N, 4.04 mg/kg of P and 0.23 cmol/kg of K. Nitrogen fertilizer (Urea) was applied at two WAP following thinning to bring the total available N to 30 kg/ha as indicated by the soil tests. Single superphosphate and muriate of potash fertilizers were applied to obtain 60 kg/ha each of P and K.Also, the hybrids were evaluated under optimal growing conditions during the 2015 and 2016 rainy seasons at Mokwa, Ikenne, Abuja (9°16'N, 7°20'E, 300 m asl, 1,500 mm annual rainfall) and during the 2015 rainy season at Ile-Ife (Table S1). The compound fertilizer, NPK (15:15:15), was applied to all the optimal trials at two WAP to provide 60 kg/ha each of N, P and K and top-dressed at four WAP with 60 kg N/ha. The low N, drought and optimal fields were kept weed-free by the application of atrazine and gramozone as preemergence and postemergence herbicides at 5 L/ha each of primextra and paraquat and later by manual weeding.The hybrids were evaluated under artificial Striga infestation at Mokwa and Abuja in 2015 and 2016 (Table S1). Ethylene gas was injected into the soil at two weeks before planting to stimulate suicidal germination of existing Striga seeds. The infestation withStriga was carried out using the method of Kim (1991). The Striga hermonthica seeds used were collected from sorghum fields in the preceding season, stored for at least six months and mixed with finely sieved sand in the ratio of 1 : 99 by weight. A standard scoop calibrated to ensure that about 5,000 germinable Striga seeds were placed in each planting hole was used for the artificial infestations.To Seeds of 41 early maturing maize inbred lines and the five lines used as testers were planted at IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. Two weeks after planting, leaf samples were collected from 30 seedlings of each inbred in the field. The leaf samples were then bulked, lyophilized, carefully packaged, labelled and transferred to CIMMYT Mexico for DNA extraction and genotyping. DNA was extracted at the CIMMYT Mexico Bioscience laboratory using the CIMMYT protocol (http://www.gener ation cp.org/capco rner/chile_wksp_2005/manua ls/manual_01.pdf).The enzyme ApeKI was used for digestion and creating a genotyping by sequencing (GBS) library with unique barcodes for each inbred line as described by Elshire et al. (2011). The reads obtained from the GBS library were called in the GBS pipeline Tassel version 3.0.147 which is an extension to the Java program TASSEL (Bradbury et al., 2007). The sequences were aligned to the maize reference genome B73 RefGen v1 after filtering using the Burrows-Wheeler alignment tool (BWA) (Schnable, Ware, Fulton, Stein, & Wei, 2009). The procedure produced 51,009 SNPs covering all the ten chromosomes of the maize genome, out of which 3,508 SNP loci, having a minor allele frequency of more than 5%and no missing values, were selected using TASSEL version 5.0, and employed for analyzing the genetic diversity of the inbred lines in the present study. The pair-wise Rogers (1972) genetic distances were estimated among the inbred lines using PowerMarker version 3.25 (Liu & Muse, 2005).Data were recorded on all plots for days to silking, and days to anthesis, anthesis-silking interval (ASI), plant and ear heights, root lodging, stalk lodging, ear aspect, ear rot and ears per plant. In addition, plant aspect was recorded on the drought, low N and optimal plots, stay-green characteristic on the low N and drought plots as described by Badu-Apraku, Fakorede, Gedil, et al. (2016) andStriga-infested plots. Under optimal and Striga-infested environments, a shelling percentage of 80% was assumed for each plot.Grain yield was obtained from the ear weight and converted to kg/ha by adjusting the moisture content to 15%. For experiments conducted under low N and drought conditions, harvested ears from each plot were shelled to determine the percentage grain moisture. Grain yield in kg/ha adjusted to 15% moisture content was then computed from the shelled grain weight. The 80% shelling percentage was assumed for entries only under Striga infestation and optimal conditions because grain filling is usually normal under such conditions.Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed across environments (location-year combinations) with PROC GLM in the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) using a random statement with test option (SAS Institute, 2011). In the combined ANOVA, genotypes were considered as a fixed factor while environment, replication within environment and incomplete blocks within replication by environment were regarded as random factors.A line x tester analysis of variance was used to determine the statistical significance of GCA-line, GCA-tester, SCA-hybrid and their interactions with the environments as described by Amegbor, Badu- To identify the most efficient inbred tester across the four contrasting research conditions, data on grain yield mean values across the four research conditions adjusted for block and replication effects were subjected to genotype main effect plus genotype x environment interaction (GGE) biplot analysis (testers were used in the analysis in place of environments) as described by Yan and Hunt (2002).Analysis of variance of grain yield and other traits across contrasting environments.Significant (p < .05) mean squares of environments (E), hybrid (G) and hybrid × environment interactions (GEI) were observed for grain yield and most measured agronomic traits across environments (Table 2). Partitioning of the hybrid components of variation into GCA of line (GCA-line) and GCA of tester (GCA-tester)and SCA mean squares exhibited significant gains for GCA-line, GCA-tester and SCA for grain yield and most measured agronomic traits across environments. The GCA-line × E and GCA-tester x E interaction mean squares were also significant for most measured traits (Table 2). In contrast, the mean squares of the SCA × E interactions were not significantly different for most measured traits (Table 2). The efficiency of a tester was assessed by the average environment (tester) coordination (AEC) view of the GGE biplot (Figure 1) as described by Yan (2014) andAkinwale, Badu-Apraku, Fakorede, andVroh-Bi (2014).The thick single-arrow line is referred to as the average environment (tester) coordinate abscissa (AEC abscissa) while the double-headed arrow line is called the AEC ordinate. The efficiency is determined by the relationship among the testers and the length of the tester vector. In the biplot display, the cosine of the angle between any two tester vectors indicates the correlation coefficient between the testers. The smaller the angle between any two testers, the more closely related the testers are in classifying inbred lines into heterotic groups. In addition, in the biplot display, the rays connecting the tester label to the biplot origin are described as tester vectors and the vector length of a tester approximates the standard deviation, which measures the magnitude (discriminating power) of its ability to assess the grain yield of the crosses. Testers with shorter vectors provide little or no information about the entries evaluated compared to those with longer vectors. Based on these criteria, the ranking based on discriminating ability of the testers was as follows: TZE 23 (C)> TZEI 17 (B)> TZEI 10 (A)> ENT 13 (E)> TZEI 129 (D). Strong positive correlations (similarity) were found among the testers B, A, E and D (Figure 1) whereas tester C was found to be unique from all the other testers. Tester C was therefore identified as the most efficient early maturing yellow inbred tester across the four research conditions. Tester B was found to be the most efficient among the testers which were found to be similar, that is A, B D and E. Hence, tester B represented the four testers. Testers C and B were therefore the most efficient among the five testers based on the discriminating ability.Considering the fact that testers A, B, D and E were similar while tester C was unique, the HSGCA heterotic grouping method classified the 41 inbred lines into three heterotic groups across the research environments (Table 3). Twenty-two of the inbred lines were placed in heterotic group 1 (heterotic group of testers A, B, D and E), 15 in the heterotic group 2 (heterotic group of tester C) and four in the heterotic group 3 (heterotic group of inbred lines which were not grouped by any of the five testers) (Table 3).The heterotic grouping method based on the SNP markers also classified the inbred lines into three heterotic groups (Table 3). Group 1 TA B L E Mean squares of grain yield and other agronomic traits of early maturing maize hybrids and five checks across contrasting environments in Nigeria between and The HSGCA method identified 68 hybrids as high-yielding and 28 as low-yielding across research environments. In contrast, the SNP-marker-based method identified 63 hybrids as high-yielding while 11 were identified as low-yielding hybrids across research environments (Table 4). The HSGCA method recorded the highest breeding efficiency of 58.1% compared to the 42.2% of the SNPmarker-based method (Table 4).The significant mean squares of E, G and GEI observed for grain yield and most measured agronomic traits across environments suggested that the test environments were dissimilar and that there were adequate genetic differences among the hybrids for effective selection for the measured traits. The results also revealed that the expression of grain yield and most of the other measured traits were not consistent in the contrasting environments. This result underscores TZEI 16,TZEI 415,TZEI 450,TZEI 173,TZEI 175,TZEI 470,TZEI 472,ENT 17,ENT 8,TZEI 124,TZEI 182 TZEI 160,TZEI 161,TZEI 24 TZEI 428,TZEI 430,TZEI 507,TZEI 474,TZEI 508,TZEI 483,TZEI 484,TZEI 432,TZEI 449,TZEI 486,TZEI 433,TZEI 520,TZEI 443,TZEI 522,TZEI 455,TZEI 515,TZEI 516,TZEI 518,TZEI 439,TZEI 441,TZEI 442,TZEI 461,TZEI 462,TZEI 464,TZEI 465,TZEI 494,TZEI 495 the need for extensive testing of hybrids across multiple locations before release and commercialization.The failure of the HSGCA and SNP-marker-based grouping methods to classify some inbreds into the heterotic groups of the five testers suggested that those inbred lines belonged to heterotic groups other than those of the five testers.The highest breeding efficiency obtained for the HSGCA heterotic grouping method compared with the SNP-marker-based method indicated that the HSGCA method was more effective in classifying the inbred lines into heterotic groups under the contrasting environments. This result confirmed that the HSGCA method was the most reliable for grouping the parental lines into heterotic groups for the development of productive and stable hybrids as well as synthetic varieties. Hence, crossing inbred lines from opposite HSGCA heterotic groups could result in more productive hybrids across drought, low N, Striga-infested and optimal growing environments. Furthermore, the inbred lines classified into the same heterotic group by the HSGCA method could be recombined to form heterotic populations that could be improved The HSGCA method had a higher breeding efficiency than the "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1348959270.json b/main/part_2/1348959270.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b9feab549c10d19ec29caef92da9bbea1f77a80 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1348959270.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d81a0b5224b99e9082bd1e583a8afc3e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f86c748b-5000-4008-9e69-13b4f2d489a5/retrieve","id":"1900179098"},"keywords":["1. Cropping systems. 2. Climatic change. 3. Mixed cropping. 4. Agroforestry. 5. Livestock. 6. Crops. 7. Cereals. 8. Manihot esculenta. 9. Oryza sativa. 10. Forages. 11. Sustainable agriculture. 12. Soil fertility. 13. Agroecology. 14. Farmers. 15. Developing countries. Local Descriptors: 1. Eco-efficient agriculture. 2. Cassava. 3. Rice. Descriptores AGROVOC: 1. Sistemas de cultivo. 2. Cambio climático. 3. Cultivo mixto. 4. Agroforestería. 5. Ganado. 6. Cultivos. 7. Cereales. 8. Manihot esculenta. 9. Oryza sativa. 10. Forrajes. 11. Agricultura sostenible. 12. Fertilidad del suelo. 13. Agroecología. 14. Agricultores. 15. Países en desarrollo. Descriptores Locales: 1. Agricultura eco-eficiente. 2. Yuca. 3. Arroz","Seré C","Rosegrant M. 2010. Smart investments in sustainable food production: Revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science 327:822-825"],"sieverID":"8cd396a2-0e6a-4499-a527-e234d3a175cb","content":"The International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) -a member of the CGIAR Consortium -develops technologies, innovative methods, and new knowledge that better enable farmers, especially smallholders, to make agriculture eco-efficient -that is, competitive and profitable as well as sustainable and resilient. Eco-efficient agriculture reduces hunger and poverty, improves human nutrition, and offers solutions to environmental degradation and climate change in the tropics. Headquartered near Cali, Colombia, CIAT conducts research for development in tropical regions of Latin America, Africa, and Asia. www.ciat.cgiar.org CGIAR is a global research partnership for a food secure future. Its science is carried out by the 15 research centers of the CGIAR Consortium in collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations. www.cgiar.orgDedicated to the memory of Anthony Bellotti (1937Bellotti ( -2013)), whose enormous professional accomplishments advanced the knowledge of cassava entomology from its infancy to maturity, opening the way for major contributions to improved livelihoods for cassava farmers.CIAT is launching a new publication series titled Issues in Tropical Agriculture, and the first item in the series is Eco-Efficiency: From Vision to Reality. At first glance, the term \"eco-efficiency\" calls to mind the oft-repeated, simplistic idea of \"producing more with less.\" But when viewed in relation to the challenge of what William Laurance and Jeff Sayer call the impending \"agricultural bomb,\" the importance of the eco-efficiency theme becomes clear.In fact, humanity is one drought away from massive famine. All it would take is an episode of dry weather, typical of past drought events, in the North China Plain, the US Corn Belt, or the Indo-Gangetic rice-wheat region. Indeed, the global food supply is on such a razor's edge that, as I was writing this foreword, a short heat wave without rain predicted for the US Corn Belt in the following week (24-30 June 2012) caused global maize prices to rise by 20% within just a few days. Since 2005, price spikes larger than this have occurred for rice and wheat, when drought or floods have occurred in a major crop production domain.But the agricultural bomb is not just a warning about the need to increase production, because we live on a spaceship with finite resources. Land and water of adequate quantity and quality to support agricultural systems for a human population of 9 billion or more by 2050 are already in short supply. While there is some additional land suitable for agriculture in remnant rainforests, wetlands, and grassland savannas, bringing this land into food production would incur unacceptable costs in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and loss of climate regulation and biodiversity.As a result, it is time to reach a global consensus on the explicit goal of meeting future food demand with the existing agricultural areaa goal that concedes conversion of an additional 100 million hectares of natural ecosystems to replace current crop land expected to be lost to urbanization and industrialization by 2050 (or about 7% of the current area used to produce annual crops).Likewise, the manner in which crops and livestock are produced on existing farmland can have devastating negative impacts on the environment, human health, and greenhouse gas emissions. So, the challenge is not only to raise yields fast enough on existing farmland but also to do so using methods that reduce the environmental footprint of agriculture. And the scale of reduction in negative environmental externalities must be substantial: Nitrogen and water use efficiencies must increase by more than 50% in some of the world's major crop production systems; farming systems must be improved to reverse current trends of soil degradation and to maintain or increase organic matter levels; and net energy yields must double.We are left with the realization that business as usual will not achieve a food-secure world on existing farmland without unacceptable loss of environmental services, because trajectories in crop yield advances and in the environmental impact of agriculture are simply not good enough. Hence, it can be argued that the single greatest scientific challenge facing humankind is generating the knowledge, technologies, and policies that can achieve the ecological intensification of agriculture that is required. This brings us back to the concept of ecoefficient agriculture. As defined in CIAT's Strategic Directions, the concept focuses on increasing productivity while decreasing negative impacts on natural resources through approaches that meet the economic, social, and environmental needs of the rural poor. It seeks to integrate the economic, environmental, and social elements of development, and strives toward solutions that are competitive, profitable, sustainable, and resilient in the face of an uncertain climate. The concept also takes into account the fact that increasing crop yields is necessary, but not sufficient, to avoid conversion of natural ecosystems; effective policies and good governance are also needed. Eco-efficiency further assumes that there are no silver bullets and that dealing with tradeoffs and using integrative and interdisciplinary approaches are essential. Finally, it recognizes that almost every future climate scenario already exists somewhere in the world today, such that helping develop eco-efficient solutions for poor farmers who struggle to feed their families in those environments is among the best research investments for adaptation to future climate change.The papers in this inaugural publication cover a number of promising technology packages and much exciting science aimed at making agricultural systems more eco-efficient. But it is also clear that a number of gaps and emerging issues remain.There is a critical need for robust, low-cost, reproducible metrics to quantify the impact of agriculture on environmental quality and human well-being. A new area of \"metrics research\" must emerge to provide the scientific underpinning for applying to complex issues easily measured, integrative parameters for monitoring impact from the field to the watershed and global levels.Likewise, there is a need for improved methods to anticipate and quantify tradeoffs at different spatial scales. For example, while organic agriculture may reduce the environmental footprint of agriculture locally, it may result in large negative impact at the global level. This could occur if organic systems are widely adopted and have lower yields per unit land area and time than conventional systems, which would encourage conversion of natural ecosystems and associated loss of environmental services and greenhouse gas emissions to meet future food demand.Therefore, one of the grand challenges for CIAT, and indeed for CGIAR and its partners, is to conduct research and support development efforts that lead to quantum leaps in the ecoefficiency of agricultural systems of greatest importance to the poor in developing countries. We are in a race against time, and there is no time to lose.The term \"eco-efficiency\" was first put forward by the private sector around the time of the 1992 Earth Summit, held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. It first entered CIAT's vocabulary in 2008, as the Center charted new strategic directions for the coming years. Management foresaw the need to identify an overarching concept that would differentiate our work from that of others and help explain our unique contribution to the strategic global research of the CGIAR Consortium, of which CIAT is a member.The eco-efficiency concept was chosen to serve that purpose, and it soon began to appear in CIAT documents and in discussions about our work. After a year or so, people began asking exactly what eco-efficiency meant for the Center's work. To some, it just sounded like another buzz word.Then, during a visit to CIAT headquarters, Derek Byerlee, former chair of the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the CGIAR's Independent Science and Partnership Council (ISPC), suggested a way to explore the ecoefficiency vision. His idea was to create a \"flagship\" publication series, whose first volume would deal with the notion in depth.We invited Derek and others -including Claudia Martínez, Rodomiro Ortiz, Nicolás Mateo, and Brian Keating -to form an editorial committee. Their efforts have resulted in this substantial scientific publication, which was first made available online (http://ciat.cgiar.org/ new-publications/) and which we are now happy to see in print.One especially noteworthy feature of this first volume in CIAT's new flagship publication series (named Issues in Tropical Agriculture) is that it involved authors from 18 other organizations, in addition to many CIAT scientists. So, ecoefficiency is not just CIAT's green paradigm but resonates with others as well.One clear message of the publication for CIAT is that taking the eco-efficiency concept seriously does not mean that we have to completely rethink our research approaches and re-engineer our programs. Most of the Center's research already matches one of the six pathways to eco-efficient agriculture described by Brian Keating in his introductory chapter. That and other chapters also make it clear that eco-efficiency is highly relevant to climate change and other major challenges for agriculture.This publication offers no simple solutions to those challenges but rather provides a set of guideposts for keeping research on track toward eco-efficient outcomes, which are important for CIAT's mission and that of CGIAR. Our challenge now is to apply the messages of this book earnestly in our work and to communicate them effectively with our partners and donors. This publication marks the culmination of much hard work by dozens of scientists at CIAT and in partner organizations. To all of them we owe a very large debt of gratitude. We also thank Ken Cassman, Chair of the ISPC, for contributing the foreword.In the long run the planet has the upper hand. In the short run humans act as if they do and as if this will continue to be the case (Hall, 2008) The concept of \"eco-efficiency\" originates from the field of natural resources research. However, in this chapter, while giving particular attention to natural resources, we adopt the more inclusive description used by CIAT and elaborated in its Medium-Term Plan 2010-2012, p.3. This states the following: \"Eco-efficient agriculture increases productivity while reducing environmental impacts. Ecoefficient agriculture meets economic, social, and environmental needs of the rural poor by being profitable, competitive, sustainable, and resilient. It harmonizes the economic, environmental, and social elements of development, and strives toward solutions that are competitive and profitable, sustainable, and resilient, and generate benefits for the poor. Eco-efficient agriculture cannot effectively address the needs of the poor without taking into account the particular needs of women.\"This definition follows suggestions of authors such as Park et al. (2010) to explicitly include social criteria as well as economic and environmental criteria in order to improve rates of uptake of eco-efficiency technologies, to promote practices that improve the effectiveness of hunger-reduction efforts, and to minimize environmental degradation. Chapter 2 of this volume goes into detail on conceptual foundations and frameworks for eco-efficiency.The seminal work of Meadows et al. (1972)-The limits to growth-impacted academia and society at large, although perhaps not so much the political process. Using what was then an advanced model of interactions between human population, industrial growth, food production, and ecosystems-World3-the authors warned that growth without limits would have serious consequences on earth's finite resources. Twenty years later the authors followed up with another significant piece, Beyond the limits (Meadows et al., 1992), in which they argued that humans were overshooting the capacity and availability of earth's resources. This research sparked, and has become a cornerstone of, the intense debate on sustainable development. More recently, Limits to growth: The 30-year update (Meadows et al., 2004) attempted once more to provide data and make a compelling case for a significant debate and urgent actions to limit and to make rational use of scarce resources.The experiences and lessons learned from the Green Revolution of the 1960s and beyond point to significant trade-offs in resource use. While there were ample benefits from targeted plant breeding and the application of external inputs in terms of increased productivity, income, and food production, this strategy placed significant pressures on natural resources and the environment.During the last 4 decades recognition of unsustainable resource use and the increasing concerns expressed by producers, consumers, and civil society have prompted the development and testing of approaches to optimize resource use, such as minimum tillage, precision agriculture, plant breeding for input use efficiency (water, nitrogen), marker-assisted breeding, and transgenic crops and animals. This volume highlights a number of these accomplishments as well as related experiences and lessons learned.Despite the advances in agricultural productivity, wasteful and contaminating systems continue to coexist with eco-efficiency-based approaches. Population growth, market forces, productivity levels, and incentives all impact on the balance between positive and negative forces driving agricultural innovation. Policies and incentives at the local, national, and international levels exert a strong influence on outputs and outcomes.We need to consider eco-efficiency beyond the farm, crop, or animal enterprise level, and extend the concepts to include the whole food chain. This will include the full life cycle of inputs to the farm and products leaving the farm, i.e., nutrient and energy flows that include transport and processing.While there are great opportunities for increasing eco-efficiency by adoption of mixed farming systems, particularly those involving both crops and livestock, the trend, particularly in developed countries, has been for increased specialization and separation of crop and livestock enterprises. Increasingly there may also be market opportunities based on consumer preferences for products from eco-efficient systems. Currently the proportion of food marketed as being from such systems is very small. Several authors (Pimentel et al., 2005;Hobbs et al., 2008;Horrigan et al., 2002) have made the case for moving high-input agriculture toward greater sustainability. The arguments for this include the beneficial effects of high levels of soil organic matter, which help conserve soil and water resources and are particularly beneficial during drought years; the unsustainability of current levels of use of fossil fuels, water, and topsoil; and the documented benefits to both the environment and productivity of direct seeding, conservation tillage, integrated systems, bed planting, and mulching.Ultimately, there will not be a simple, single solution to increasing the eco-efficiency of agriculture. There are practical advantages for intensive agriculture and low-input agriculture to each adapt and adopt the best practices of the other. High-input agriculture should aim at becoming more eco-efficient, and low-input agriculture needs to aim at higher productivity, often based on more intensive practices. To meet the growing demands for food, feed, fiber, and fuels from agriculture in the long term, this combination of higher productivity and sustainability through eco-efficient practices is imperative.The question \"why worry about producing more food?\" needs to be considered from several angles.First is how much we are currently producing. Despite constraints in water availability, land, and fertilizers (particularly nitrogen), the world should be able to feed itself. According to The Economist (2011), allowing for the staggering amounts of food wasted and all the food that could be eaten but is instead turned into biofuels, farmers are producing much more food than is required-more than twice the minimum nutritional needs of about 2100 calories a day.The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) estimated that we need to increase food supplies by 70% by 2050 if we are to feed a population of 9 billion (FAO, 2009). This is a major challenge, and even more so with the constraints of available water, land, and fertilizer.Currently, every 9 months we consume what the planet's ecology can provide sustainably in any given year (Global Footprint Network, 2011). From that point until the end of the year, we meet our ecological demand by liquidating resource stocks and accumulating CO 2 in the atmosphere. This cannot continue.Another way to visualize this imbalance in resource use is humanity's ecological footprint. The Living planet report 2010 (WWF, 2010) reveals that this footprint has more than doubled since 1966. In 2007, the most recent year for which data are available, humanity used the equivalent of 1.5 planet earths to support its activities. Even with modest United Nations (UN) projections for population growth, consumption patterns, and climate change, humanity will need the capacity of two earths by 2030 to absorb CO 2 waste and keep up with natural resource consumption. The report illustrates the scope of the challenges humanity faces, not only for preserving biodiversity, but also for halting climate change and meeting basic human development aspirations, such as reducing worldwide hunger and poverty.The increased food insecurity and vulnerability of a large number of people worldwide point to a broken food production and distribution system. We need to look at the contribution agriculture should make not only to feed a growing population but also to impact less on the planet's resources. The future food supply equation needs to consider the current reality of lower growth rates for major crop yields in conventional agriculture, eco-efficient approaches to diminish impacts on natural resources, the climate change challenge, and the volatility of energy prices. Intensive, oil-dependent agriculture is reaching worrisome yield plateaus and water tables keep decreasing.The world needs a new paradigm for the ways that we use natural resources-a new set of tools and policies. Should we eat less? Should we eat smarter (e.g., less protein of animal origin, with its high demands for energy, land, and water)? Should we create incentives to use fewer resources and implement legal directives to push for eco-efficiency? Should we put in place measures to control population growth? Pimentel et al. (2008) demonstrate that use of fossil energy in the United States' food system could be reduced by about 50% if appropriate technologies were adopted in food production, processing, packaging, transportation, and consumption.Agricultural productivity must increase if we are to meet the increasing demands of a growing and more affluent population for food, feed, fiber, and fuels in the context of limited land available for expansion of agriculture (Hubert et al., 2010). Humans have always attempted to raise the efficiency of agroecosystems, aiming to harvest more per unit of input, mainly water, nutrients, energy, or agrobiodiversity (see Chapter 2 of this volume). Efforts to increase productivity should therefore consider crop breeding (particularly for maximizing input use efficiency and for host plant resistance for reducing pesticide use), eco-friendly husbandry, and the sustainable use of natural resources (especially agrobiodiversity), while enhancing ecosystem services. This volume explores many ways that this can be accomplished.Sustainable intensification of agriculture should reduce the need to expand into environmentally vulnerable areas, thereby sparing some lands from further degradation by concentrating production in others. However, the result of this approach is not always clear cut. Rudel et al. (2009) analyzed trends in area planted to 10 major crops between 1970 and 2005, with particular emphasis on the 1990-2005 period. The data suggest that agricultural intensification was not often accompanied by decline or even stasis in cultivated area on a national scale, except in countries that imported grain and implemented conservation set-aside programs. Thus, policies and innovations aimed at increasing land use efficiency must be carefully designed and monitored to assure they have the desired impact, rather than leading to uncontrolled land use expansion (Lambin and Meyfroidt, 2011).Humans face the challenge of managing trade-offs between immediate needs and maintaining the capacity of the biosphere to provide goods and services in the long term (Foley et al., 2005). Policy measures are needed that provide incentives for development and adoption of more diverse, eco-efficient farming; such measures include premium prices for products from eco-efficient systems, and price supports for the provision of their environmental services. Innovative education is needed on whole-system approaches that feature resourceuse efficiency and resilient farming systems to train a new generation of practitioners whose main aim will be ensuring productivity, profitability, and security of food value chains (Francis et al., 2011).There are numerous approaches for increasing agricultural productivity using eco-efficient production systems. For example, integrating livestock, crops, and forestry systems can lead to higher productivity and lower negative impact. In such integrated systems, livestock are reared mostly on grass, browse on nonfood biomass from maize, millets, rice, and sorghum and in turn supply manure and traction (Herrero et al., 2010). Wilkins (2008) argues that eco-efficiency can be increased either by altering the management of individual crop and livestock enterprises or by altering the land use system, for example by adopting mixed crop-livestock systems that incorporate biological nitrogen fixation and use of manure as fertilizer. Combining intensification, better integration of animal manure in crop production, and matching nitrogen and phosphorous supply to livestock requirements can effectively improve nutrient flows (Bouwman et al., 2011). Furthermore, a shift in human diets (e.g., poultry or pork replacing beef) can reduce nutrient use in countries with intensive ruminant production.Land use changes impact the quality and availability of soils, water, and biodiversity. Globally, croplands, pastures, plantations, and urban areas have expanded in recent decades, accompanied by large increases in energy, water, and fertilizer consumption, and significant losses of biodiversity (Foley et al., 2005). These changes can also lead to changes in atmospheric concentration of CO 2 , and may therefore be a contributor to climate change (see discussion below).As noted by Lambin and Meyfroidt (2011), Bhutan, Chile, China, Costa Rica, El Salvador, India, and Vietnam managed to increase both agricultural production and the area of forests in their territories. In doing this, they relied on various mixes of agricultural intensification, land use zoning, forest protection, increased reliance on imported food and wood products, creation of off-farm jobs, foreign capital investments, and remittances. The authors conclude that sound policies and innovations can, therefore, reconcile forest preservation with food production.According to FAO (1993), there is an increasingly urgent need to match land types and land uses in the most rational way possible, so as to maximize sustainable production and satisfy the diverse needs of society while at the same time conserving fragile ecosystems and our genetic heritage. Land use planning is fundamental to this process. It is a basic component, whether we are considering mountain ecosystems, savannas, or coastal zones, and underlies the development and conservation of forestry, range, inland, and coastal resources (FAO, 1993). For example, land use allocation has contributed to protecting the Peruvian Amazon, in spite of recent increases in disturbance and deforestation rates (Oliveira et al., 2007). Likewise, protection of productive agricultural land has become a major priority in many regions of the world. Overgrazing and intensive agriculture on marginal lands are a major driver of land loss through degradation. Policies are in place in many countries to avoid this loss of production, but their effectiveness in the face of economic demand is often limited (Ellis and Pontious, 2010).The assumption that large-scale mechanized agriculture is more productive and efficient than small, family farms may be influencing agricultural development policy around the world. In several continents, developing countries are moving toward large-scale, corporate farming as a way to boost production and jump-start agricultural development (Landesa, 2011).In the case of Canada, Maynard and Nault (2005) propose to maintain both big and small farms, given the current situation where 2% of farms produce 35% of the food. The authors propose overall strategies to keep and expand the number of small enterprises, for example, maintaining vibrant rural communities, investing in research and extension, and implementing incentives, regulations, and indicators. Current regulations are not properly differentiated and tend to favor big farms. They also examine the term \"sustainability\" in the context of big and small farms and find that conclusions are difficult, as the term is open to multiple interpretations. The daily reality of farming asks the questions of tradeoffs between sustainability and profitability.The debate about the costs and benefits of biofuels (economically and environmentally) now focuses squarely on whether their use causes too much conversion of natural lands into crop and livestock production around the world. According to Babcock (2009), \"the worry is that the loss of carbon stocks on the converted land would more than offset the direct reduction in greenhouse gas emissions caused by lower gasoline use. The California Air Resources Board has concluded that corn ethanol causes such large amounts of land conversion that it does not qualify as a low-carbon fuel. In its recent analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that corn ethanol and biodiesel made from soybean oil cause enough land use changes to call into question whether these biofuels meet required greenhouse gas reductions.\" New technology, crop management changes, and renewable energy are playing important roles in increasing the energy efficiency of agriculture and reducing its reliance of fossil resources (Woods et al., 2010). Alternative renewable energy sources also bring diverse opportunities and challenges, such as how to integrate potential biofuel markets, deal with impacts on food security, alleviate poverty, and manage crop and natural resources sustainably (FAO, 2010). The agricultural systems used to produce feedstock for biofuels must use biomass sustainably, and partition it among energy, feed, food, and CO 2 fixation demands (Tilman et al., 2009). Hill et al. (2006) indicate that biofuels produced from low-input biomass plants grown on marginal land or from waste biomass, could provide much greater supplies and environmental benefits than staple food-based biofuels. Appropriate life-cycle analysis will therefore be needed to determine the use of land resources and estimate net carbon emissions of each suggested renewable energy technology (Vonblottnitz and Curran, 2007).There has been a dramatic rise in interest of investors in acquiring farmland, particularly in Africa, as a result of the escalating food prices at the end of the first decade of the 21st century. The focus of this interest has largely been on land with agricultural potential that is either uncultivated or producing less than its potential. This food crisis pointed to new players, challenges, and perhaps some opportunities associated with land use changes. This phenomenal development, if considered by the sheer size of the lands being acquired (some 56 million hectares in 2009), has prompted specific proposals on the ethics and principles that should be applied by all interested parties (Deininger et al., 2011). Three key principles that are closely related to the issue of land use change are:• Respecting land and resource rights.Existing rights to land and associated natural resources should be recognized and respected. • Responsible agro-investing. Investors should ensure that projects respect the rule of law, reflect industry best practice, are economically viable, and result in durable shared value. • Environmental sustainability. Environmental impacts of a project should be quantified and measures taken to encourage sustainable resource use while minimizing and mitigating the risk and magnitude of negative impacts.A recent report from the World Bank (2009) examines commercial agriculture in the Guinea savanna and elsewhere in Africa. The report claims that African agriculture continues to lag, as reflected in the decline in international competitiveness of many traditional African export crops during the past 30 years, as well as in the competitiveness of some food crops for which import dependence has increased. In contrast, over the same period two agricultural regions in the developing world have shown the way-the Cerrado region of Brazil (see Chapter 4 of this volume) and the Northeast Region of Thailand.Both have developed at a rapid pace and conquered important world markets. Their success defied the predictions of many skeptics, who had asserted that the two regions' challenging agroecological characteristics, remote locations, and high levels of poverty would prove impossible to overcome.Two recent developments have led to a change in thinking about the potential of African agriculture (The World Bank, 2009). First, during the past decade, strong agricultural growth has been recorded in many African countries, suggesting that the sector can indeed be a driver of growth when the conditions are right. Second, the steep rise in prices of food and agricultural commodities that occurred in 2008 has led to a realization that new opportunities may be opening for countries that are endowed with the land, labor, and other resources needed to respond to the growing demand for food.Although there may be a large regional variability, models suggest that changes in temperature and precipitation patterns due to climate change and increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO 2 will significantly affect agroecosystems and yields (Battisti and Naylor, 2009;Lobell and Field, 2007), reducing food availability and thereby jeopardizing food security and farm incomes (Lobell et al. 2008) (see also Chapter 3 of this volume). There will be shifts of plant distributions because some species will expand into newly favorable areas and others will decline in increasingly adverse locations. Climate change may increase global timber production as a result of changes of forestry locations (shifting from low-latitude regions in the short term to high-latitude regions in the long term as climate changes), whereas demand for forest products will rise slightly (Kirilenko and Sedjo, 2007).Agriculture contributes to carbon emissions through the direct use of fossil fuels in farming, the indirect use of energy in inputs that are energy-intensive to manufacture (e.g., fertilizers), and the cultivation of soils resulting in the loss of soil organic matter (Pretty and Ball, 2001). Agricultural management explains historic changes in regional soil carbon stocks. Agriculture is also a major contributor of atmospheric nitrous oxide (N 2 O), a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) commonly generated by the use of manure or nitrogen (N) fertilizers. In intensive wheat-cropping systems, common N fertilizer practices may lead to high fluxes of N 2 O and NO (nitric oxide). Several groups of heterotrophic bacteria use NO 3 as a source of energy by converting it to the gaseous forms N 2 , NO, and NO 2 . N 2 O is therefore often unavailable for crop uptake or utilization.Land use change contributes considerably to increases in atmospheric CO 2 . The IPCC (2007) estimates the land use change (e.g., conversion of forest to agricultural land) contributes 1.6 ± 0.8 gigatons of carbon per year to the atmosphere, compared with 6.3 ± 0.6 gigatons of carbon from fossil fuel combustion and cement production.The total biomass carbon stock of tropical forests is estimated to be 247 gigatons, with 193 gigatons stored above ground and 54 gigatons stored below ground in roots. Latin American, sub-Saharan African, and Southeast Asian forests account for 49, 25, and 26% of the total stock, respectively (Saatchi et al., 2011). Deforestation and degradation of tropical forests accounted for 12 to 20% of global anthropogenic GHG emissions in the 1990s and early 2000s. Reducing deforestation and forest degradation would thus both reduce GHG emissions and increase the potential of forests to remove additional carbon from the atmosphere. Expansion of cattle ranching has been identified as a major cause of deforestation and a major contributor to CO 2 emissions (see Chapter 10 of this volume). The carbon footprint of beef produced on newly deforested land in the Amazon exceeds 700 kg CO 2 equivalents per kilogram of carcass weight if direct land use emissions are annualized over 20 years (Cederberg et al., 2011). Enteric fermentation is also a major contributor to GHG emissions, particularly in the developing world, which accounts for almost three-quarters of such emissions (Thorpe, 2009). Intensive ruminantbased meat production systems consume large amounts of high-value feed but suffer from low feed conversion rates and long reproductive intervals, making them inefficient users of resources. Changing from ruminants to monogastrics could significantly reduce the contribution of livestock to GHG production (Steinfeld and Gerber, 2010).Adoption of eco-efficient practices would contribute immensely to solving land use and climate change challenges noted in the previous sections. Agriculture can sequester carbon when organic matter is built up in the soil or when above-ground woody biomass acts either as a permanent sink or is used as an energy source that substitutes fossil fuels. The mitigation effects of adoption of improved pastures, intensifying ruminant diets, changes in land use practices, and changing breeds of large ruminants could account for 4 to 7% of the global agricultural mitigation potential to 2030, or US$1.3 billion per year at a price of US$20/t of CO 2 equivalents (Thornton and Herrero, 2010).Expanding cropland onto areas under natural ecosystems reduces carbon stocks in natural vegetation and soils, with the amount of carbon released and crop yields differing markedly between temperate regions and the tropics (West et al., 2010): for each unit of land cleared, land in the tropics releases nearly twice as much carbon (~120 t/ha vs. ~63 t/ha) and produces less than half the annual crop yield as land in temperate regions (1.71 t/ha per year vs. 3.84 t/ha per year). However, high-input industrialized agriculture uses far more energy, in the form of nitrogen fertilizers, pumped irrigation, and mechanical power, than does low-input, sustainable agriculture, making it less energy efficient. Production of 1 ton of cereals or vegetables from high-input farming consumes 3000-10,000 MJ of energy, compared with only 500-1000 MJ using sustainable farming practices (Pretty and Ball, 2001). Van Wesemael et al. (2010) studied changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in soils in Belgium between 1960 and2006, and found a large reduction in SOC in grassland soils that had been drained after 1960, and large gains in croplands in sandy lowland soils due to manure additions. Cassman (1999) indicates that precise management and improvements in soil quality are needed to achieve high yields without causing environmental damage. Conservation agriculture, green manures, and cover crops contribute to organic matter and carbon accumulation in the soil, physically protect the soil from the action of sun, rain, and wind, and help feed soil biota. No-tillage systems result in accumulation of 0.3-0.6 t C/ha per year, but no-tillage combined with rotations and cover crops may double the amount of carbon accumulated, to 0.66-1.3 t C/ha per year (Pretty and Ball, 2001).No-tillage has revolutionized agricultural systems because it allows individual producers to manage larger amounts of land with fewer inputs of energy, labor, and machinery (Tripplet and Dick, 2008). Lal (2010) points out that not all conservation agriculture practices and other resource conservation technologies are applicable across all farming systems. However, he reports that increasing SOC in the root zone can increase grain yields (kg/ha per ton of C) of bean (30-60), maize (200-300), rice (20-50), soybean (20-50), and wheat (20-40). Such increases in SOC also improve soil quality, increase eco-efficiency, and enhance ecosystem services. Such soil sinks must become permanent if they are to contribute to mitigating climate change; if lands under conservation agriculture are ploughed all the gains in soil carbon and organic matter would be lost.Using the correct amount and timing of N application can halve NO 2 emissions in intensive irrigated agroecosystems without significantly affecting crop yields (Ruan and Johnson, 1999). Using a handheld optical sensor that calculates the normalized differential vegetation index (NDVI), thereby assessing yield potential as plants grow, can reduce unnecessary N-fertilizer inputs, saving farmers money and protecting the environment by reducing trace gas emissions. Some plants produce chemicals that inhibit nitrification in the soil, reducing loss of fertilizer N (Fillery, 2007). This ability, which is referred to as biological nitrification inhibition or BNI (Subbarao et al., 2006), seems to vary widely among and within species, and appears likely to be a widespread phenomenon in tropical pasture grasses (Subbarao et al., 2007).Nitrification inhibition enhances agroecosystem fertility in a sustainable way, especially under high nitrate leaching and denitrification fluxes, which may account for the ecological advantage of African grasses over indigenous grasses in South American pastures (Boudsocq et al., 2009). These deep-rooted grasses (e.g., Brachiaria humidicola) also sequester significant amounts of organic carbon deep in the soil and help offset anthropogenic CO 2 emissions (Fisher et al., 1994). Brachiaria humidicola, an African forage grass found from southern Sudan and Ethiopia in the north to South Africa and Namibia in the south, shows particularly high BNI capacity (Ishikawa et al., 2003;Subbarao et al., 2009).Local agrobiodiversity will be an important coping mechanism for climate change, especially for the most vulnerable people (Ortiz, 2011a). Agro-silvo-pastoral systems can also be designed to optimize agrobiodiversity and attain production benefits without adding pressure to convert natural habitat to farmland (Ortiz, 2011b; see also Chapter 4 of this volume). However, in some areas locally available agrobiodiversity may not able to adapt quickly to changing conditions, and therefore new crop cultivars, livestock breeds, or other species better suited to the new environments will be needed to cope with climate change.Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of agricultural systems can be increased by growing plant species or genotypes with high N uptake and utilization abilities (Fageria and Baligar, 2005). Whole-plant physiology, quantitative genetics, and forward-and reverse-genetics approaches are providing a better understanding of the physiological and molecular controls of N assimilation in crops under varying environments (Hirel et al., 2007). Crops are being bred for NUE because this trait will be a key factor in reducing N fertilizer pollution and increasing yields in N-limiting environments.Besides sophisticated approaches to make photosynthesis more efficient, a number of already well-developed biotechnologies such as plant micropropagation, virus-free planting materials, molecular diagnostics of plant and livestock diseases, and molecular markers to identify superior lines and populations in conventional breeding operations must continue to be improved and disseminated, particularly in those countries with limited research infrastructure and low rates of adoption. Production of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), undoubtedly the most controversial approach of the new biotechnologies, holds significant promise for contributing to ecoefficient agriculture, but there is an urgent need to focus investment on the needs of the poor (The World Bank, 2008). This is likely to require increased public investment in these technologies. It will also be necessary to increase the capacity to evaluate the risks and regulate these technologies in ways that are cost effective and inspire public confidence in them.However, conventional breeding, benefitting from techniques such as marker-assisted selection, is likely to be at the center of agricultural developments in the immediate future. Unfortunately, the number of plant and livestock breeders continues to decline. This will affect our capacity to improve crops and animals in the future, and urgent measures are needed to reverse this trend.Eco-efficient agriculture will only be adopted and implemented if conducive policies and incentives are in place. This will require that lessons be learned from prior experiences, alignment with market forces, clear communication and engagement with public opinion, development of public-private partnerships, and strong leadership.Any eco-efficiency approach must recognize and exploit the impact of multidimensional economic, environmental, and social interactions on the four components of the food system, i.e., availability, utilization, accessibility, and stability (Park et al., 2009). Failing to do so will impede uptake of adaptation and efficiency strategies.There is an urgent need to intensify, diversify, and integrate production systems to achieve eco-efficiency, but this will require more than just technical solutions. A new vision, combined with policies and incentives, needs to be part of the mix. Reverting to mixed farming will not be easy (Wilkins, 2008). Persuading farmers to do so will require evidence of clear economic advantages from linking crop and livestock systems, cost-effective ways of handling and incorporating animal manures, and systems that are managerially simple to operate. It may also require conducive policies and support payments. For example, the European Union's Nitrate Directive and the Water Framework Directive, by limiting inputs, have provided a very direct incentive for the adoption of eco-efficient practices, while support payments have promoted conversion of land to organic farming and maintenance of organic systems (Wilkins, 2008).The food requirements of the expected population levels in 2050 cannot be met exclusively by the intensive agriculture of today, simply because the natural resource base would either collapse or be placed under very severe stress. Likewise, less input-intensive, agroecological approaches-in particular integrated livestock, crop, and tree systemscould not be utilized everywhere due to limitations in labor, land, water, markets, and infrastructure. Technology, innovation, and policies are essential components of the mix in order to reach acceptable social, economic, and environmental outputs and outcomes in the future. Consumers exert significant pressure on the market and are ultimately one of the main drivers of the agricultural agenda (Gopalan, 2001).Policies and subsidies are sensitive and controversial issues. Developed-country agricultural policies cost developing countries about US$17 billion per year, a cost equivalent to about five times the current levels of overseas development assistance to agriculture, while subsidies in developing countries divert funds from high-return investments in public goods (The World Bank, 2008). Investment in infrastructure (irrigation, roads, transport, power, and telecommunications), markets, rural finance, and research would boost agricultural productivity in developing countries while being less distorting than price subsidies and incentives.How best to promote products from eco-efficient systems is an area that requires further research and more systematic analyses in order to guide both producers and consumers on food grown using eco-efficient approaches. For example, there are learning opportunities from the experiences of the organic markets and locally produced foodstuffs, as well as consideration of non-price incentives and the power of consumers to guide production towards a more eco-efficient path.Eco-efficient agriculture can deliver quality products that meet consumers' needs with a low ecological impact. However, to ensure that it does so equitably and sustainably it is imperative that assessments address social and economic performance as well as ecological criteria (Park et al., 2010).Research on and implementation of the concept and practices of eco-efficiency must be sensitive to gender issues. Women play a major role in agriculture, accounting for about 70 to 80% of household food production in sub-Saharan Africa, 65% in Asia, and 45% in Latin America, cultivating food crops and commonly contributing to production of commercial crops (The World Bank et al., 2009). Women are generally responsible for food selection and preparation and for the care and feeding of children. They are thus key to food security for their households (Quisumbing et al., 1995).Women also commonly play active roles as traders, processors, laborers, and entrepreneurs. However, many development policies and projects continue to assume that farmers and rural workers are mainly men (The World Bank et al., 2009). According to Deere and Leon (2003), about 70 to 90% of formal owners of farmland are men in many Latin American locations.A World Bank water and sanitation study (Fong et al., 1996) concluded that gender is an issue not only of equity but of efficiency, because involving both women and men enhances project results, increases cost recovery, and improves sustainability. A review of 121 rural water supply projects found that women's participation was among the variables strongly associated with project effectiveness in the sector. Women's participation serves both practical and strategic gender needs. The practical gender needs of women are needs based on existing divisions of labor and authority, whereas the strategic gender needs are those that require redress of gender inequalities and redistributing power more equitably.A closer look at women's roles in agricultural production (Table 1-1) illustrates the important part they play in every aspect of agriculture and food production, the significant challenges they face, and why gender-neutral strategies alone will not be sufficient to meet future needs and expectations.Both men and women play critical and often complementary roles, both at the farm-level in smallholder agricultural systems and downstream in more intensive production systems, where processing, packaging, and overall value-adding require the complementary abilities and knowledge of women and men. Interventions must address the specific needs and opportunities of both women and men, particularly the poorest, if they are to reduce inequalities, stimulate growth, and contribute to reducing environmental degradation (The World Bank et al., 2009). To achieve this it is vital to understand and change natural resource tenure and governance and address gender-based inequalities in access to and control over natural resources.The World Bank (2006) sums up the importance of addressing gender issues, stating that \"Gains in women's economic opportunities lag behind those on women's capabilities. This is inefficient, since increased women's labor force participation and earnings are associated with reduced poverty and faster growth. In sum, the business case for expanding women's economic opportunities is becoming increasingly evident; this is nothing more than smart economics and appropriate social policy.\"Eco-efficiency monitoring requires disciplined record-keeping and managed conservation to ensure long-term environmental improvement (Reith and Guidry, 2003).Life-cycle analysis (LCA) helps to assess potential environmental impacts along the value chain (McGregor et al., 2003). LCA quantifies inputs (e.g., water, nutrients, energy, and agrochemicals) and outputs (e.g., grain, stubble, flour, oil, waste), assesses the environmental performance relative to input use and outputs, analyzes and explains the environmental performance of the supply chain, and suggests where and what measures can improve performance. LCA helps the individual actors (farmers, food processors, farm suppliers, retailers, and end users) to manage their environment along the value chain, to set their own environmental performance goals and indicators, and to identify practical, cost-effective measures to improve environmental performance. It can also be used to improve the quality of extension services, increase the profitability of farms by green marketing, and support the regional transition to sustainable agricultural systems (Hayashi et al., 2007).In agriculture, water, energy, and land use intensity are used as resource intensity indicators, whereas NO x pollution, CO 2 , and CH 4 intensity are used to measure environmental impacts (United Nations, 2009). Wießner et al. (2010) introduced a set of practical indicators reflecting ecological and agronomic performance to describe the current eco-efficiency of sugar-beet cultivation,Those agricultural systems and practices that release less C to the atmosphere, conserve organic matter, utilize biological methods for disease and pest control, use clever rotations, pursue recycling opportunities by means of crop, tree and animal components and interactions, and use water rationally tend to be inherently eco-efficient. Humankind-given prospective demands and socio-economic, political and environmental challenges-will not be able to sustain and survive based solely on low-input agricultural systems. Intensive and high-input agriculture also has a key present and future role to play; however, it must attempt to do more with less and, as argued by several authors, it should aim at being more sustainable (Pimentel et al., 2005;Hobbs et al., 2008;Horrigan et al., 2002).In summary:• In view of the challenge to enhance productivity and counteract current yield plateaus in key crop and animal systems by means of eco-efficient methods, technology must be at the forefront of political, strategic, and investment priorities. • Policies and incentives should be also of high priority, in order to tilt the balance towards eco-efficiency, food security, food safety, and reduced waste. • Researchers and policy-makers need to consider the more-from-less, the more-frommore, and even the same-from-less scenarios to define priorities and goals at the national, regional, and local levels. In this context, eco-efficiency needs to be considered at wider scales than the farm or individual crop or animal production system. • The widely assumed notion that developed countries are the ones that tend to specialize in few intensive production systems no longer holds. A growing number of large and intensive crop and animal enterprises (in particular fruits, vegetables, poultry, and beef for the export markets) are nowadays commonly found in the tropical belt. • Generation and dissemination of ecoefficiency knowledge and adoption will greatly benefit from active participation of farmers in research and development, enhanced extension methods (including the new information technologies), and producer and consumer education. • The current and potential impact of climate change on achieving a higher degree of eco-efficiency needs to be better researched and understood. There are both challenges and opportunities that must be worked out, particularly in relation to how eco-efficiency may or may not impact diversification and systems adaptability. • Research and implementation of the concepts and practices of eco-efficiency cannot and should not be made with a gender-neutral approach. Lessons learned all over the world and abundant literature clearly show the advantages-smart economics as depicted by the World Bank ( 2006)-of considering and designing research and implementation of eco-efficient systems based on gender roles and inherent advantages.In the lines of thought outlined above the best possible outcome is for high-input intensive agriculture and low-input agriculture to come closer to each other. High-input agriculture should certainly aim at becoming more environmentally friendly and low-input agriculture should adopt, whenever possible, a more intensive approach leading to higher productivity Hill J; Nelson E; Tilman D;Polasky S;Tiffany D. 2006. Environmental, economic, and The notion of \"efficiency\" has always been a force shaping the world's food and fiber systems.Hunter-gatherer societies sought efficiencies in direct time and energy into creative and practical activities beyond securing a sufficient food supply.As settled agriculture evolved, seeds were selected, land was cultivated, and crops were managed to further enhance the efficiency with which limiting resources were deployed. Human labor has been a dominant limiting resource for much of agriculture's history. Animal traction and, more recently, mechanization off the back of fossil fuels relieved the human labor constraint and the efficiency focus has shifted to the efficiency by which a complex set of land, labor, capital, energy, nutrients, and water resources are combined to produce economic products in a sustainable way.This paper proposes a conceptual and analytical framework to support the desired goals of enhanced eco-efficiency in agricultural systems and of economic and ecological drivers considered at a range of decision scales. While the challenges and opportunities to improve eco-efficiencies under the threat of climate change are considered, particularly for smallholder production systems, the paper focuses on the bio-physical dimensions of eco-efficiency. Social and political drivers strongly influence agricultural decision-making and so will influence the eco-efficiencies that can be attained in each agricultural system.Eco-efficiency in the context of agriculture grows out of the deep historical pursuit of efficiency in the world's food and fiber systems, but places particular focus on economic (productivity and profitability) and ecological (environmental sustainability) drivers of efficiency.The World Business Council for Sustainable Development claims first use of the term \"ecoefficiency\" in the lead-up to the 1992 Rio Earth Summit (WBCSD, 2000). In that setting, the intent was to develop synergies between the private sector or business world's focus on efficiency with wider concepts of sustainable development and ecological integrity. In simple terms, the focus was on \"creating more goods and services with ever less use of resources, waste, and pollution\" (WBCSD, 2000). The World Business Council saw eco-efficiency as a management philosophy that encouraged business to search for environmental improvements that yielded parallel economic benefits. They acknowledged that the term and concept did not capture all the issues relevant to sustainable development.An early application of eco-efficiency in an agricultural research context comes from CIAT in setting their research and development goals in terms of eco-efficient agriculture for the rural poor. CIAT's Medium-Term Plan (CIAT, 2009) states:\"Eco-efficient agriculture increases productivity while reducing negative environmental impacts. Eco-efficient agriculture meets economic, social, and environmental needs of the rural poor by being profitable, competitive, sustainable, and resilient. It harmonizes the economic, environmental, and social elements of development, and strives toward solutions that are competitive and profitable, sustainable, and resilient, and generate benefits for the poor. Eco-efficient agriculture cannot effectively address the needs of the poor without taking into account the particular needs of women.\" Keating et al. (2010) noted that eco-efficiency was not a tightly defined concept-instead it was highly multidimensional. As such, there is unlikely to be a single measure that characterizes the eco-efficiency performance of an agricultural system. Instead, a set of measures is likely to be relevant in particular circumstances and these are likely to change in relation to differences in the most limiting set of biophysical, economic, or human resources (Park et al., 2010).Any measure of eco-efficiency involves some measure of outputs (desired or undesired) related to some measure of inputs or alternative independent variables against which outputs are assessed. Figure 2-1 presents a set of outputinput relationships, nominally representing crop Desired-output measures might typically include some measure of harvested product, some measure of profit or return on investment, or some measure of the security of a food system. Measures could extend beyond food quantity and include measures of quality in meeting nutritional needs. A broader suite of \"ecosystem services\" can also be considered as desired outputs, such as services around biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, freshwater flows, pest management, or pollination services (Costanza et al., 1997). Markets are emerging for some such ecosystem services whereby they would represent direct opportunities for economic return (Herzog, 2005). This is most developed in the carbonsequestration domain (Hamilton et al., 2007). Other services are encouraged through nonmarket policies such as agri-environmental stewardship payments (Hajkowicz, 2009), while yet other services remain outside an institutional mechanism.Input measures typically involve a unit of land but equally importantly could be expressed in terms of nutrients, water, energy, labor, or capital investments (Figure 2-1). Production functions relate agricultural outputs to the level of resource and other inputs (Dillon, 1977) and, at one level, are a measure of eco-efficiency. In analyzing production response curves to multiple inputs, de Wit (1992) argued that the resources are utilized most efficiently when their supplies are all close to yield-optimizing levels.Importantly, while eco-efficiency carries the notion of \"more with less\" (Keating et al., 2010), there is the risk of this being misinterpreted to mean only higher outputs with lower inputs. This is too narrow an interpretation, as at least four different scenarios can be envisaged for raising eco-efficiency (Table 2-1).Input/output descriptor Explanation and example(s)More desired outputs and/or less undesired outputs with less inputs Reducing over-fertilization, such as N-fertilizer use on cereals in China (Ju et al., 2009), or over-irrigation such as with irrigation volumes on sugarcane in north-west Australia (Smith, 2008) A lot more with a little more Raising production levels through careful targeting of production inputs such as \"micro-dosing\" maize or sorghum with N fertilizer in southern Africa (Twomlow et al., 2008) More with the smarter use of the same Raising the effectiveness of current agricultural inputs through better targeting these inputs in space, such as via precision agriculture (Bramley, 2009), or time, for example with a seasonal climate forecast (Ash et al., 2007) Less with much less Lowering production in those regions or systems where inputs are not efficiently used (e.g., for climatic or soil reasons) and redirecting resources to areas of greater ecoefficiency (Oliver et al., 2010) Agriculture produces a range of products (food, fiber, bioenergy, medicines, etc.) but not without broad and, at times, unsought consequences for land and society. Thus, alongside the desired outputs from agriculture are possible undesired outputs such as biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, nutrient or soil loss, and other forms of land degradation. These undesired outputs often are also a function of relevant input levels (Figure 2-1).The range of outputs from agriculture, both desired and undesired, can be assessed in trade-off relationships (Groot et al., 2007), often where production outputs are counterbalanced against the state of a system in environmental or social terms (Kelly et al., 1996). When represented graphically (Figure 2-2), an outer efficiency frontier can be drawn to represent the outermost desirable system outputs for the range of known (undesired) system states. Any point under the efficiency frontier represents room to move, with resultant wins and/or losses for both production and environmental outputs (Figure 2-2). An Eco-Efficiency Framework Keating et al. (2010) introduced an eco-efficiency diagnosis framework drawing on the types of relationships represented by production functions and trade-off relationships. A return-risk space formed the supporting analytical structure to assess system performance-mean economic returns are plotted against their associated variance, used as a measure of riskiness. An efficiency frontier of outermost points was envisaged where mean returns are maximized for any given level of variance in returns. This ecoefficiency diagnosis framework is represented in Figure 2 At the field and farm scale, the position of individual farmers relative to the efficiency frontier is largely determined by their attitude to risk and operational performance. To achieve the environmental potential or maximum possible output from a farm (Point A, Figure 2-3) necessitates acceptance of maximum risk, and thus a preference for risk-taking, as well as exemplary management. More likely, a region's best farmers choose acceptable-risk investments that return less than the potential (Point D). If farmers are operating close to the efficiency frontier, at their chosen level of production risk, they are achieving the expected level of return for the technologies deployed and the environmental conditions experienced. However, many farmers in a region would operate at positions below the efficiency frontier (Point B). These farmers invest as much in their production systems as the better farmers but achieve poorer returns by falling short in their agronomy and operational management.A first and most important pathway to improve system performance is to increase the number of farmers performing close to attainable best practices (Pathway 1: B D). Their transition to performing on a par with the better farmers will likely require both evidence of such inefficiencies and access to better agronomic advice. A second pathway is to encourage farmers to move along the current efficiency frontier to higher returns while acknowledging and addressing the added risks (Pathway 2: G D). This pathway largely consists of good farmers adopting the practices of those farmers operating further up the efficiency curve. Such farmers need to be convinced that the increased investment needed to achieve the returns of the best farmers justifies their higher risk exposure. In a case study of Australian wheat crops, Hochman et al. (2011) reported that 36% of crops failed to achieve close to their attainable yield at the rate of nitrogen fertilizer applied and a further 21% of crops were under-fertilized-opportunities for efficiency improvements along pathways 1 and 2, respectively.Under existing production systems and relevant efficiency frontiers, the third pathway for improved system efficiencies is to encourage farmers to reduce their investment in inputs where they are overinvesting (Pathway 3: beyond A D). Although uncommon, excess use of fertilizers is evident in some agricultural systems, as in nitrogen fertilizer use in China (Ju et al., 2009).Increasingly, more efficient resource use has been a mainstay of agriculture's response to the cost-price squeeze. For a region's better farmers, who currently operate on existing production frontiers, a real and ongoing requirement is to create new efficiency frontiers that generate similar returns for less investment and risk (Pathway 4: D C). Such technologies generally enable cost savings and have no impact on production potential. On this pathway, technologies are sought to increase productivity from the existing resource base by reducing biotic constraints or to improve efficiencies in nutrient, water, or labor use. Such technologies can be developed through both agronomic (Bramley, 2009) and breeding approaches (Fageria et al., 2008).A key role for agricultural research is to help discover the practices that will result in the next step-change in productivity and profitability. Thus, the fifth pathway is to create new efficiency frontiers by increasing the production potential and by helping farmers take this productivity step (Pathway 5: D F). Most see this pathway as the hope for genetically modified crops (Phillips, 2010). In reality, furthering the frontiers of productivity will likely evolve from the synergies between novel plant genetics and innovative management technologies. Moving farmers to new efficiency frontiers will require research into and delivery of new technologies that increase production for much the same level of investment.Maintaining current levels of productivity for a desired level of investment requires ongoing effort to prevent situations that could substantially limit productivity. The sixth and last pathway for investment in research, development, and extension is to protect against any loss of current production systems (Pathway 6: D ≠ E). Indeed, significant current effort is targeted either at preventing any breakdown in existing disease, weed, or pest management strategies, or at maintaining facilities to rapidly respond to future outbreaks of exotic diseases, weeds, or pests. Either threat could dramatically dampen the efficiency frontier prospects of farmers. Likewise, practices that threaten the natural resource base for agriculture will result in an unavoidable loss of productivity. Issues such as soil salinity, acidification, and nutrient rundown require research investment to ensure productivity levels are maintained. Keating and Carberry (2010) projected food demand out to 2050 and estimated likely increases in the order of 64-81%, with the variation dependent on assumptions of population growth, consumption increases, food wastage along the value chain, and food diversion to biofuels. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) estimated that food demand will increase by 70% between 2000 and 2050 (FAO, 2009). These increases will need to be achieved in the face of increasingly constrained and contested land, water, nutrient, and energy resources. The threat of dangerous climate change also means the food security challenge has to be met while reducing the GHG load on the atmosphere and in the face of uncertainties generated by the climate change that is already happening. These intertwined challenges necessitate an eco-efficiency imperative for global agriculture, where more food and fiber are produced with more efficient use of natural resources and less impact on the environment.The climate change challenge facing agricultural land use encompasses both adaptation to current and predicted new climates and the mitigation of GHG through both reductions in direct emissions and biosequestration of carbon. Globally, agriculture, including fertilizer production, directly contributes 10-12% of GHG emissions; and this figure rises to 30% or more when land conversion and emissions beyond the farm gate are added (Smith et al., 2007). The consensus on the climate science is that global GHG emissions would need to peak before 2015 and be reduced by something in the order of 50-85% (on 2000 levels) by 2050 if dangerous climate change (i.e., temperature rise > 2.4 o C) is to be avoided (IPCC, 2007). The relationship given as an example in Figure 2-2 depicts a trade-off between agricultural production and GHG emissions. A win-win outcome for agriculture and its emissions will require eco-efficient solutions that create new efficiency frontiers of reduced GHG intensities of food production. These new efficiency frontiers are required to generate similar outputs for less emissions risk (Pathway 4, Figure 2-3) or to increase production potential without emissions growth (Pathway 5).Agricultural production may have to intensify efficiently on a smaller land area in order to free up land, water, and other resources for carbon biosequestration and environmental services (Pretty et al., 2011). Nevertheless, there are indeed win-win outcomes through the synergies between agricultural productivity and GHG mitigation by increasing soil carbon (Lal, 2004), reducing livestock methane (Beauchemin et al., 2008), or better managing livestock and manure (Monteny et al., 2006). That said, Campbell (2009) points out that win-win outcomes will not be feasible in all cases and so winners and losers are likely in programs such as the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD+).The challenge of adaptation to climate change has largely focused on ameliorating the negative impacts of climate that is likely to be drier and hotter, although the benefits of CO 2 fertilization and improved agroclimatic environments will be evident in some locations (Howden et al., 2007). Simple (negative) impacts of climate change are depicted in the production response functions shown in Figure 2-4 together with an indication of the likely effect of adaptation options identified by Howden et al. (2007) and others. Such adaptation actions aim to maintain current production outputs through management changes that better respond to the new environments (Pathway 6, Figure 2-3). However, in reality, all six pathways identified for efficiently increasing agricultural returns will contribute to the adaptation options for climate change-i.e., the long-held imperatives for increasing agricultural productivity through both incremental and transformational research and uptake will likely lead to appropriate responses to a future probable change in the climate risk. Thus, the imperative for research to help farmers to better deal with current seasonal climate variability will likely enable them to adapt to future climate change (Howden et al., 2007). The need for targeting transformational research specifically to adaptation to future climate change must pass the test of additionality; the notion that such added investment should be additional to what is already being done. Changes in frequency and magnitude of climate extremes, and thus agricultural systems crossing thresholds (Tubiello et al., 2007), may be the driver for such additional and specific response.Explicit treatment of uncertainties in a decisionmaking context is needed to ensure that adaptation action now does not get ahead of our confidence in locally specific expectations for the future. In smallholder tropical environments with large numbers of biophysical and institutional factors constraining development, it would be unwise to focus on adaptation to an uncertain future climate if it meant that certain current constraints to agricultural development were ignored. Building a longer-term climate change perspective into current efforts to raise agricultural productivity, sustain the natural resource base, and overcome rural poverty is, however, a wise counter to the risk of development proceeding down maladaptive pathways (Stafford Smith et al., 2011).In the generally low-input, low-output situations of smallholder farmers in the tropics, natural resources are co-opted to meet food production needs. Thus, while nutrient inputs may be used most efficiently for the first unit of addition in these systems (Twomlow et al., 2008), the coincident inputs of land, water, and labor are used inefficiently in many smallholder systems. Eco-efficiency needs to be an integrating concept, extending beyond single-factor production functions to a measure of the efficiency with which food production needs are met with the least environmental impacts.The six pathways for enhanced eco-efficiency (Figure 2-3) are relevant to smallholder farmers in the tropics. The large yield gaps identified in tropical systems (Neumann et al., 2010) testify to the prospects for moving overall farmer performance closer to the attainable efficiency frontiers (Pathway 1). However, given that smallholder systems are often low input, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, there is likely much to gain from encouraging farmers to move along currently attainable efficiency frontiers in order to increase returns to individual farmers and aggregate production from smallholder farming systems (Pathway 2) (Keating et al., 1991;Tittonell et al., 2008). Addressing farmer perception and management of the added risks from such practices is a critical endeavor for success in this pathway. Similarly, encouraging farmers to reduce their investment in unnecessary inputs (Pathway 3), as in nitrogen fertilizer use in China (Ju et al., 2009), will require comparable persuasive communication of the benefits of a significant change to established practices.Creating new efficiency frontiers that improve returns, lower risks, or both (Pathways 4 and 5) can benefit smallholder farmers by enhancing the incentives for adoption-the Green Revolution is the exemplar case of the impacts of these pathways for improved productivity (Evenson and Gollin, 2003). Certainly the needs of Green Revolution smallholder farmers in tropical Asia and Latin America now mirror the demands for productivity innovations from large-scale commercial farmers in developed countries. Agricultural productivity in the past can be pinned to the development and adoption of specific technologies and practices and it is critical today that new technologies continue to be identified, developed, and adopted over the coming years (Carberry et al., 2010).In contrast to Asia and Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa has not gained the same benefits from the Green Revolution. Despite the arguments for significant returns from Green-Revolution-type investments to improve smallholder productivity and infrastructure in Africa (Diao et al., 2008), it is difficult to see traction for such pathways (4 and 5) without prior priority given to improving basic agronomic performance and to changing perceptions of investment risk (Pathways 1 and 2). Here, the increasing role of the private sector and input/ output markets in Africa may hold hope for progress (Gabre-Madhin and Haggblade, 2004).Finally, the mitigation and adaptation challenges of climate change and their relation to the food security imperatives in tropical landscapes are a mix of synergies and trade-offs (DeFries and Rosenzweig, 2010). As argued previously, an eco-efficiency imperative utilizing all available pathways will need to be brought to bear.We have focused on biophysical issues around the efficiency with which natural and human inputs are transformed into desired food and fiber outputs and environmental services, with a minimum of undesired outputs such as natural resource degradation or GHG loads on the atmosphere. In the context of global or regional food security in the face of climate change mitigation and adaptation challenges, this serves as a useful framing for a key global challenge. However, social and economic circumstances are going to shape decision-making in a particular farming situation and efficiency optima are often going to be different for production, productivity, profitability, or risk tolerance criteria.In a broader view of eco-efficiency, spatial and temporal scales become important. In terms of spatial scale, what might be an eco-efficient solution at a local level may be ecologically inefficient at national or global scale if the production activity is less productive and more environmentally demanding at other locations. In terms of temporal scale, short-term efficiency in resource use that leads to longer-term naturalresource degradation will end as up ecologically inefficient due to the longer-term negative feedbacks to productive capacity.The proposed eco-efficiency diagnosis framework (Figure 2-3) allows these different perspectives to be contemplated in terms of pathways for change. The challenge for smallholder farmers in the tropics (and for this CIAT publication) is to turn these concepts into practice.Climate change is widely considered one of the major drivers of societal change in this century, and agriculture has been identified as particularly 1 International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.2 CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Cali, Colombia. 3 Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science (ICAS), University of Leeds, United Kingdom. * Corresponding author: a.jarvis@cgiar.org exposed and vulnerable to its impacts (Lobell et al., 2008;Roudier et al., 2011;Thornton et al., 2011). In addition to crop losses from the increased incidence of natural disasters (floods, droughts, fires, etc.) (Sivakumar et al., 2005;Tao et al., 2009), agricultural systems will have to cope with changing rainfall regimes, geographical shifts in the occurrence of pests and diseases (Garrett et al., 2012;Jarvis et al., 2012), shorter growing seasons (Jones and Thornton, 2009), temperature stress (Challinor et al., 2007) and loss of climatic suitability (Jarvis et al., 2012). Global climate models 4 (GCMs) predict that while climatic variability is certain to produce both winners and losers, the losses will far outweigh the gains in many cases. The tropics, in particular, are expected to experience crop yield decreases in the order of 10-30% (Moorhead, 2009). Likewise, South Asia might well be too heat stressed to grow wheat by 2050 (Ortiz et al., 2008;Lobell et al., 2012). Both of these regions depend heavily on agriculture for rural livelihoods, making them especially susceptible to climate-change-induced pressures.Agriculture's position in the climate change equation is perhaps unique; it is simultaneously a highly vulnerable sector as the numbers above indicate, a highly culpable sector with regard to its significant contribution to anthropogenic emissions (Key and Tallard, 2012), and also a sector with enormous potential for mitigating anthropogenic climate change (Hutchinson et al., 2007;Tubiello and Fischer, 2007). Indeed, agriculture produces a disproportionate share of emissions of the high-impact gases methane (CH 4 ) (47% of global total) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) (58% of global total) (Pye- Smith, 2011). It is responsible for 30% of all greenhouse gas emissions when taking into account land use change and deforestation for agricultural expansion, fuel, fiber, and food (IPCC, 2007). On the other hand, carbon sequestration in agricultural soils could potentially offset 5-15% of global fossil fuel emissions (Lal, 2004), not to mention the mitigation power of deforestation reduction and fertilizer and irrigation optimization through sustainable intensification practices.These considerations make climate-smart agriculture a critical topic for discussion and rapid action. Changing conditions require transformations in agricultural systems towards higher productivity, but on a lower-emissions trajectory (FAO, 2010a). Climate-smart agriculture aims to achieve food security for a world of 9 billion people and successful adaptation to an increasingly variable climate, while reducing emissions and sequestering carbon. It includes practices such as agroforestry, mulching, water management, intercropping, and silvopastoralism, as well as technologies for climate risk management, such as more accurate weather forecasts and the development of improved food crop varieties (Cooper et al., 2012;Smith et al., 2011;The World Bank, 2011). Specific definitions for climate-smart agriculture can vary widely depending on the source. For the purposes of this chapter we will use the following definition for climate-smart agriculture: an agricultural system employing practices which (a) contribute to farmer adaptation to climate change by bolstering the security of food systems, or (b) help to mitigate climate change by sequestering or preventing the release of carbon emissions, while (c) ideally increasing agricultural productivity.Although climate-smart agricultural practices have been shown to be effective in matters of adaptation and mitigation, there remains the question of whether a climate-smart practice is necessarily an eco-efficient practice. When applied to agriculture, eco-efficiency describes a system that produces the most possible output with the least possible input, harmonizing economic, social, and environmental needs (see Mateo and Ortiz, Chapter 1 of this publication).But to what extent do eco-efficient practices overlap with climate-smart practices? Although climate-smart farming practices may be able to reduce emissions from agriculture, do they also constitute a system that uses resources effectively and efficiently for maximum yields?This chapter shows how climate and crop models can be used to anticipate future scenarios for agricultural development and support decision making for priority adaptation and mitigation interventions. Future projections are presented, which are then used to evaluate impacts on agricultural production and systems. The chapter then presents a case study of Colombia, where likely climate changes are quantified, impacts on agricultural systems are assessed, and the efficacy of different adaptation and mitigation options for the country is evaluated. This example is then used to discuss whether climate change presents a challenge or an opportunity for eco-efficient agriculture, looking at the impacts and potential responses in a broader political economy. Using the example, we address the following question: are the high-priority adaptation and mitigation options identified for Colombia necessarily ecoefficient as well?While GCMs are all based on the same underlying principles, they vary in their implementation. We rely on the comprehensive collection of GCM climate change data and statistics of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for the scenarios presented here.The IPCC used 24 GCMs in its Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) (IPCC, 2007) to show changes in climatic variables at various times in the future. The predictions depend on which of the various scenarios of economic and environmental development is assumed to occur, analyzed in detail in the IPCC's Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) (IPCC, 2000). Overall, annual mean temperatures are predicted to increase by 1-3° C by 2050 (depending on the SRES scenario), with mid-to high latitudes likely to warm at higher rates than the tropics. Changes in rainfall are varied and complex, ranging from -10 to +20% (again depending on the SRES scenario), with very high likelihood of increases along the Pacific coast of South America and in Eastern Africa, and decreases over South Asia (IPCC, 2007). More specifically, under the SRES A2 scenario (\"business as usual\"), global mean temperatures are predicted to rise by 1.6-8.4 °C by 2050, with winter temperatures at northern latitudes increasing most, while global average rainfall is predicted to increase as much as 1.9% by 2020 and 22.8% by 2050 (IPCC, 2007).Again under the SRES A2 scenario, the Mediterranean area of North Africa extending towards the Sahara is predicted to be drier throughout the year. Changes in rainfall in Asia are spatially variable, while in the Middle East, predictions show a decrease in overall rainfall [although with low certainty (IPCC, 2007)]. Changes in rainfall in the Amazon are highly uncertain, ranging from -10 to +15% by 2050.All of these changes are expected to have profound implications for world agriculture, but the impact will depend on: the crop grown, farmer adaptability to climate change, type and severity of the expected change, and the current system vulnerability. Coping with these changes requires reliable predictions of future climate, coupled with reliable impact models and knowledge of adaptation options that can be implemented at the individual farm level (Jarvis et al., 2011;Thornton et al., 2011).We cannot measure the response of the climate to natural or anthropogenic forcings in absolute terms, but we can represent it in GCMs. GCMs themselves, however, are based on imperfect approximations that cause inaccuracies and uncertainties. Inaccuracies occur when we do not reproduce observed climate patterns at the scales that they appear (i.e., predicted climates differ from observations). In contrast, uncertainties reflect the variability (i.e., spread) of GCM predictions and can arise from:• Disagreement on the future socio-economic behavior of the world's nations, leading to disagreement over which SRES scenarios to use • Lack of understanding of the response of the climate system to anthropogenic forcing • Inability to understand properly, and hence model, the different forcings in the climate system, which are then parameterized differently in the GCMs • Disagreement over GCMs' initial conditions (i.e., the fact that climate change experiments are initialized arbitrarily on the basis of a quasi-equilibrium control run) (Challinor et al., 2009).Often the conditions necessary to initialize GCMs in climate change experiments must be selected randomly (Gleckler et al., 2008;Taylor et al., 2012), which contributes to model spread. Uncertainties, therefore, are a range of predictions for any future time giving us a plausible range under which the impact of potential adaptation-or mitigation-oriented decisions can be analyzed (Moss et al., 2010;Webster et al., 2012). Quantifying these uncertainties is critical to understanding the future changes in climate and how agricultural systems will respond to them (Challinor et al., 2009;Moss et al., 2010).Given enough observed data, we can assess the predictive skill for any climatic variable prediction by the GCMs, but a variable that performs well in one instance (i.e., present-day climate) may not perform well in others (i.e., future scenarios) (Challinor and Wheeler, 2008). In addition, the uncertainty determined for one variable does not necessarily represent the uncertainty of all the others. That is, one variable's estimate of \"high uncertainty\" does not signify that the projection is highly uncertain in absolute terms. Quantification of uncertainty is critical for decisions regarding adaptation of agricultural systems to climate change (Smith and Stern, 2011;Smith et al., 2011). These decisions directly impact farmers' livelihoods and therefore need comprehensive analysis of current vulnerabilities and future uncertainties to avoid the risk of making faulty recommendations (Jarvis et al., 2011).Despite the inherent uncertainties in climate change projections, there can be no excuse for inaction on the policy front. On the contrary, decisions on adaptation strategies should be anticipatory, putting into place as much effective policy and infrastructure as possible in the near term to avoid possibly irreversible repercussions. Moreover, anticipatory adaptation has the additional benefit of reducing the potential costs that may result from maladaptation, particularly for decisions regarding long-lived and costly infrastructure or sector-level planning (Ranger et al., 2010).Climate change adaptation is by no means without risk. Decision makers may fail to appreciate the magnitude of a climate-related risk and not deliver a crucial adaptation, or there is the possibility of overestimation of risk and thus \"over-adaptation\" and waste of resources (Willows and Connell, 2003). Although we cannot predict with complete certainty how the climate will be in the future, it is possible to take steps to buffer negative effects with minimum levels of risk. That is to say, adaptation does not necessarily require a perfectly accurate prediction. A framework developed by Willows and Connell (2003) emphasizes the necessity of keeping open or increasing the options that could allow adaptation measures to be implemented in the future, when the situation may be less uncertain.According to Willows and Connell (2003), risk assessments should aim to identify \"no-regrets\" alternatives or immediately actionable options that should deliver adaptation benefits under any circumstances regardless of actual climate outcomes. For example, an early-warning system for natural disasters would be a suitable adaptation for any foreseeable future; it would constitute a \"no-regrets\" option (Ranger et al., 2010). Other plausible approaches include building flexibility into the adaptability measure, e.g., constructing infrastructure that could be modified in the future, if necessary, rather than rebuilt, or building flexibility into the decisionmaking process itself by taking no-regrets actions first and delaying more high-stakes actions until better information is available (Ranger et al., 2010). Doing so could help to avoid decisions that may become maladapted with time or limit further flexibility. Planned adaptation options may be the most appropriate in the face of low uncertainty, while generating adaptive capacity in a system might be a more appropriate strategy if there is high uncertainty of climate impacts. In any case, while uncertainty may complicate the decisionmaking process, it should not hinder it altogether. and no crop becoming more than 10% more suitable. Over half (26) of the crops were relatively insensitive to climate change (suitability changing less than 5%). Global changes in suitability may, however, vary from one region to another and 37 crops lost more than 50% of the area currently classified as suitable (Figure 3-1).Trends in crop suitability also differed geographically. North Africa lost an average of 80% crop suitability, while Europe made the most important gains with no crop losing more than 5% suitability on average. Latin America, the Pacific, the Caribbean, and sub-Saharan Africa lost about 35-40% suitability overall, even allowing the crop area to migrate. Important issues of food security arise when crop suitability decreases significantly, especially in subtropics of the Mediterranean and India (Challinor et al., 2007).Overall, the tropics become less suitable because critical thresholds of adaptability are exceeded in most marginally suitable areas (Figure 3-1). Predicted losses of more than 20% climate suitability will occur over 10, 15, 50, and 75% of the area currently growing cassava (Ceballos et al., 2011;Jarvis et al., 2012),We ranked the area harvested of the 50 most important crops reported by FAOSTAT (FAO, 2010b) and assessed their patterns of crop suitability using the EcoCrop model, following the procedure described by Ramírez-Villegas et al. (2011). The areas of each crop ranged from 26,290 to 2,161,000 km 2 , and each had a wide range of physiological responses to climate, for example, growing seasons (40-365 days), rainfall (200-8,000 mm/yr), and temperatures (2-48 °C). Within their environmental ranges (as indicated by EcoCrop), adaptation for a particular crop ranged from very marginal to highly suitable. We expected, therefore, to show the range of climatic response of each crop and estimate the likely effects of climate change on crop distribution.We found that if crops were assumed to migrate without limit, global crop suitability increased by 0.84%, with buckwheat increasing most (+9.7%) and wheat decreasing most (-15.1%). At the global scale, 16 crops were less suitable, with wheat, sugar beet, white clover, and coffee becoming more than 10% less suitable, bananas (Ramírez et al., 2011;Van den Bergh et al., 2012), potatoes (Schafleitner et al., 2011), and beans (Beebe et al., 2011), respectively. In contrast, black leaf streak, a major disease in bananas, is predicted to decrease by 3-7% in most banana-growing areas (Ramírez et al., 2011). Crop traits that the model flagged as important were: cold/waterlogging tolerance for cassava (Ceballos et al., 2011;Jarvis et al., 2012), cold/heat tolerance for bananas (Ramírez et al., 2011), heat/cold/drought tolerance for potatoes (Schafleitner et al., 2011), and heat/drought tolerance for beans (Beebe et al., 2011). Although cold tolerance may seem an odd trait when climate change predicts higher temperatures, at least some tropical crops may extend into the subtropics where cold snaps can damage sensitive crops (e.g., citrus in Florida).In the past, farmers have adapted their cropping systems to tackle adverse climates and to respond to other environmental pressures. It is likely that they will continue to adapt their systems as the climate changes by adopting new varieties -or even new crops altogether -and by changing agronomic practices such as time of sowing (IPCC, 2007;Krishnan et al., 2007;Srivastava et al., 2010). There is a clear need to develop strategies to alleviate the negative impacts and capitalize on the positive impacts of climate change, particularly in the most vulnerable regions such as the tropics and subtropics. Adaptation strategies to overcome reduced crop suitability include:• Changes in management to temporarily buffer negative climate change impacts • Changes in infrastructure and timing, including modification of irrigation and drainage amounts, frequencies, and system types • Modification of varieties in a well-defined regional breeding strategy, using both conserved genetic resources and molecular biotechnology to respond quickly to adaptation needs as they appear • Changes in the intercropping, e.g., crop migration, taking into account economic and environmental sustainabilityAnother possibility is changing one or more of the components of the cropping system. Changing crops might be the only option available to poor smallholders, who are the most vulnerable, least able to adapt to rapid change, and most limited in access to new technology. Crop substitution therefore appears to be a key issue when addressing adaptation pathways for negatively impacted areas. It will be a challenge to produce well-adapted varieties that also comply with the many entrenched socio-cultural traditions that might prevent their adoption, such as regional preferences for size and color of beans in Mesoamerica (Thornton et al., 2011), or fruit characteristics in commercial bananas (Ramírez et al., 2011;Van den Bergh et al., 2012). Substitution of completely new crops will be even harder to bring about.Given the significant shifts in the geographic suitability of crops, a considerable turnover in agricultural technologies and practices is likely to take place. The result could be more opportunities for piggy-backing change, both through appropriate deployment of technologies/practices and the creation of suitable incentive mechanisms that ensure that new agricultural systems deliver greater eco-efficiency. However, this poses the question: are climate change adaptation and mitigation measures always going to be ecoefficient?This section develops a concrete example of a climate change challenge and the possible response mechanisms to put to the test the hypothesis that eco-efficient agriculture is synonymous with climate change adaptation and on-farm mitigation interventions specific to the case of Colombia. First, climate impacts are assessed and the effects these have on crop suitability are quantified. Possible response mechanisms in the rice sector are then developed and tested economically and biophysically for their likely effectiveness in adapting to the various challenges.We extracted annual rainfall and mean annual temperature data for Colombia for two time slices -2030 and 2050 (Figure 3-2) -from 19 global climate models (GCMs) forced with IPCC SRES scenario A2 (IPCC, 2007). SRES A2 is one of the less optimistic, \"business-as-usual\" scenarios based on continued regionally oriented economic and industrial intensification. Atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) over the 10 years since the SRES was published broadly match the scenario's prediction. We emphasize that the predictions in the text that follows are derived from the GCMs and should be treated as such.Precipitation in Colombia will likely decrease in some areas and increase in others for both time slices [Figures 3-2(A) and 3-2( The largest predicted decreases in annual precipitation are in the departments of Atlántico, Norte de Santander, Cesar, Sucre, Arauca, and Magdalena, and the largest increases will likely be in Valle del Cauca, Amazonas, Cauca, Quindío, Nariño, Tolima, Huila, and Caquetá. Precipitation patterns in 2030 and 2050 may be very similar to current patterns, though differing in magnitude, with ranges of -3 to +3% in 2030, and -6 to +5% in 2050.Overall, mean annual temperatures are predicted to increase by 1.0-1.4 °C by 2030 and by 1.8-2.4 °C by 2050 (Table 3-1). Although mean annual temperatures will probably increase in all departments, the increase is likely to be greatest in Vaupés, Guainía, and Vichada for both 2030 and2050 [Figures 3-2(C) and 3-2Colombia is projected to warm 1.4-2.5 °C by 2050, while precipitation is likely to vary between -6% and +5% in the current values. Distribution of precipitation is also likely to change, again varying by region. Temperature-sensitive crops may be affected by the higher temperatures and have to move to higher altitudes to avoid suffering significant losses of yield and quality. There will likely be trade-offs, e.g., with areas at or under 1,200 m altitude becoming less suitable for coffee than at present, while areas above 1,800 m become more suitable.Although the GCMs are based on current understanding of the atmospheric processes, they do not implement that understanding in exactly the same way, causing their outputs to differ. The global climate change community deals with this by expressing the variation (i.e., spread) in the output as \"uncertainty\". 5 Uncertainty is a property of the external world, not the model itself, and as such it arises from a lack of data and/or knowledge about the initial conditions of the system, including the impossibility of modelling at a very high resolution (Challinor and Wheeler, 2008;Hawkins and Sutton, 2009;Majda and Gershgorin, 2010).The uncertainties of the 19 GCMs for annual precipitation and annual mean temperature are shown in The dispersion between models for precipitation is high (Figure 3-3), especially along the Colombian Andes. This outcome is probably due to the complex topographic gradients of the Andean region, which cannot be resolved with such coarse models. Hence, some models project large increases and decreases in precipitation in highland areas, but only small changes in the country's lowlands, such as the Eastern Plains and the Caribbean regions. The result is high uncertainty for regions in the center of the country (Table 3-1).The largest decreases in precipitation -up to 60 mm/yr by 2050 -are projected for the Caribbean region. The most pronounced increases are for the Amazon region and the coffee-growing zone: up to 130 mm/yr, although with relatively high uncertainty.Although the scales are different, the uncertainty for mean annual temperature is relatively low when compared with the uncertainty for annual precipitation (see also Hawkins and Sutton, 2009;2011 for a global analysis of 5 Although we are unable to represent exactly in a mathematical model how nature works, in this case the complex interactions of atmospheric circulation, there a number of different models that mimic the processes tolerably well. The results of these models can be expressed as a comparison between models (see e.g., Knutti et al., 2009;Meehl et al., 2007). There is an implicit understanding that the models used are approximations to what might be obtained from a thorough analysis if a fully adequate model of real-world processes were available. uncertainty). Both the differences between models and the standard deviation of their outputs vary longitudinally, increasing towards the east of the country, particularly in the Eastern Plains and the Amazon. The uncertainty in these two areas is also higher than elsewhere. The GCMs differ considerably -by up to 5 °C -in their projections for 2030 and 2050, although the mean of all models shows an increase of only half that by 2050. Differences between the GCMs, and thus their uncertainty, are relatively low in the southwest of the country.We cannot be certain which of the GCMs best represents the future climates. However, we can evaluate how well their output matches the baseline climates , i.e., present-day climates for which we have observational data.A simple way to evaluate the performance of We compared the results of each GCM with the readily-available climate databases WorldClim (Hijmans et al., 2005), Global Surface Summary of Day (GSOD) (Lott, 1998), Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) (Peterson and Vose, 1997;Lott, 1998), and Climate Research Unit (CRU) (Mitchell and Jones, 2005) following the methodology of Ramírez-Villegas et al. (2012) and Ramírez-Villegas and Challinor (2012) (Figure 3-4). We analyzed total rainfall and mean temperature over four seasons (Dec-Feb, Mar-May, June-Aug, Sept-Nov) and the whole year (ANN). For each model, the mean of all stations (GHCN and GSOD) or grid cells (WorldClim and CRU) was computed, GCM grid cells grouped, and the spatial consistency of the mean climate prediction assessed by calculating the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) between the observed data and the GCMs. This coefficient defines the skill of each climate model to represent the climate of the baseline period.The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) for the baseline of annual precipitation is medium-high for the majority of the GCMs, especially for the interpolated surfaces (WorldClim and CRU), but is lower for the station data (GSOD and GHCN) because of their geographic distribution and relative scarcity (Figure 3-4). The GCMs perform slightly better for annual data, but less well for seasonal data, especially in the second semester (JJA-SON). At least 40% of the seasons and GCMs perform poorly (R 2 <0.6) for precipitation, and only 20% perform well (R 2 >0.8). In contrast, R 2 for mean temperature is greater than 0.95 for all the models, both for the annual cycle and for seasons of the year (see also Ramírez-Villegas et al., 2012). We conclude that GCMs can generate data of mean future climates with moderately high precision for temperature and low precision for precipitation, although models still have a long way to go before they can predict Colombian climate variations accurately.We calculated the average change in climatic suitability for 25 crops selected for their importance in harvested area (ha) and production (t) in Colombia (Table 3-2), calculated averages for each department, and grouped them by region. We estimated the change in climate suitability using EcoCrop (Hijmans et al., 2001;Ramírez-Villegas et al., 2011) and applied the SRES A2 scenario for 2050 using data from 19 GCMs (Ramírez-Villegas and Jarvis, 2010). Current climate data were from WorldClim (Hijmans et al., 2005).Overall, and using ±50% as the cutoff, losses in climate suitability between now and 2050 were greater than the gains. Losses could be seen in up to 82.7%, or about 945,930 km 2 , of the country's total area (1,143,640 km 2 ), while the remaining 17.3% (197,710 km 2 ) should continue to have suitable climatic conditions for growing crops. The most critical regions are the Amazon, Caribbean, Pacific, and the Eastern Plains, where all departments are projected to have negative changes, although changes in several departments may be less than 15%. Changes will likely be positive in five of the seven Andean departments and all three of the coffee-growing region's departments: Caldas (3.8%), Risaralda (4.9%), and Quindío (12%).It is useful for planning purposes to determine how many of the 25 crops analyzed are likely to become more suitable for the climate (winners), and how many are likely to become less suitable (losers) . In this case, the threshold of climate suitability -that is, a crop's climatic aptitude (CA) -for a winner or loser is ±5%.In some departments in the Andean and Pacific regions (Antioquia, Boyacá, Cauca, Cundinamarca, Nariño, and Valle del Cauca), 7-10 crops covering 1.6 million ha could gain in CA. In the departments of La Guajira, Cesar, and Bolívar in the country's Caribbean region, 9-13 crops covering 440,000 ha could decrease in CA. About 72 million ha show uncertainty (coefficient of variability between models) less than 30%, mostly in the Andean and Eastern Plains regions, which represent most of the country's agricultural activity.Rice ranks first among short-cycle crops in terms of its importance to Colombia's economy.The country is the second largest rice producer in Latin America, and even so is a net rice importer. Rice is the primary source of calories for the low-income group, which accounts for over 37% of Colombia's population (The World Bank, 2012).The two predominant systems of rice production in Colombia are mechanized -which includes both irrigated and rainfed systems -and manual, with all production activities being undertaken with hand labor. In 2007, Colombia produced 2,471,545 tons of rice on over 400,000 ha of land (Fedearroz, 2007).An expert workshop on climate change at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) identified two potential climate-smart adaptation pathways for rice in Colombia: irrigation of traditional dryland rice and genetic modification for high-temperature tolerance. We also considered three mitigation measures for rice in Colombia: managing flooded rice to minimize CH 4 emissions, eliminating burning of crop residues, and optimizing the amount of applied fertilizer.Two important tools for selecting and prioritizing \"no-regrets\" adaptation or mitigation options are cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and cost-efficiency analysis (CEA). For adaptation purposes, the most relevant analysis is usually the CBA, which asks whether the returns (benefits, such as avoided damage/losses or extra developmental benefits compared with \"business as usual\") are greater than the costs (extra investment compared with \"business as usual\"), and by how much. CBA quantifies all costs and benefits of an intervention with monetary values, making it appropriate when economic efficiency is the only decision-making criterion (UNFCCC, 2011).The impact of climate change on crops can be quantified with modelling, as can the extent to which impacts can be avoided through one or more adaptation options. Thus the most effective adaptation option can be chosen based on a discrete comparison of the cost of implementing the adaptation measure and its resulting benefits (improvement in crop production, avoidance of economic losses). Elements of climate change mitigation, on the other hand, are not always so easy to express in monetary terms. For example, the benefits of reduced GHG emissions are not restricted to the site of the emissions but are global in their effects, making them difficult to estimate (it is not yet possible to estimate GHG emission damages by modelling at the specific local level and then extrapolating globally). Positive environment-, health-, or livelihoodrelated outcomes cannot be valued in a strictly monetary sense because they are not localized in the way that adaptation benefits are. CEA is useful for situations in which there is a concrete objective and where impacts are measurable but benefits are not (UNFCCC 2011), as is the case with many mitigation measures. The costs in a CEA can be valued in monetary terms, but the benefits must be expressed in \"physical\" units. It is then possible to construct a costefficiency curve that can be used to identify and prioritize those mitigation measures that are economically viable for achieving a well-defined physical target.Out of the area under rice production in Colombia, 256,295 ha (64%) are irrigated and 29,556 ha (36%) are dryland/rainfed (Fedearroz, 2007). The potential area for irrigation based on water availability and climate is estimated to be 6.6 million ha (AQUASTAT, 2010). Dryland rice will be vulnerable to yield losses from water stress caused by climate change, i.e., increased evapotranspiration due to higher temperatures and compounded by lower overall rainfall. Furthermore, the introduction of modern seed varieties has seen dryland rice lose competitiveness with irrigated systems; the average yield gap between irrigated and dryland systems can be more than 4 t/ha (Lang, 1996).We simulated the effects of climate change for dryland rice with the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) (Jones et al., 2003), using the variety and agronomy currently recommended by the National Federation of Rice Growers (Fedearroz, its Spanish acronym). We first simulated the effect of climate change without irrigation and subsequently its effect with irrigation. We estimated the costs of providing irrigation in terms of the initial investment required and the costs of operation and maintenance with a life span of 20 years. We calculated the benefits of the irrigation project as the difference between rice production with and without irrigation under the SRES scenario A2. We calculated operation and maintenance costs and estimated an increase of 1% annually, using an annual social discount rate of 12%. Analysis of the financial flow shows that building an irrigation system in the Colombia's Caribbean and Eastern Plains regions gives positive net present values (Figure 3-6), and in each case the development would be financially viable.The second adaptation measure that we tested was a research program to seek and develop, by 2030, new rice varieties tolerant of higher temperatures. The rising temperatures expected from climate change pose a threat to rice production by increasing the risk for spikelet sterility during development. However, rice germplasms exhibit great variability in their response to heat stress. Heat-tolerant cultivars have been shown to respond well to increased Costs and benefits year by year for an irrigation system project in Colombia's Caribbean and Eastern Plains regions, and net present value (NPV) with a social discount rate of 12%. temperatures while still producing economic yield (Shah et al., 2011). Furthermore, improved cultivars could potentially offset stress from increased evapotranspiration by exhibiting better water use efficiency, greater harvest indices, and deeper/faster-growing roots.We used the costs of a 26-year research program (including researchers, assistants, field workers, materials, infrastructure, and operational and administrative costs) and simulated the yields in 2050 of the currently recommended variety and a synthetic variety less sensitive to temperature using DSSAT. 6 We calculated the benefit as the economic value of the difference in production between the current and the synthetic varieties. We assumed a progressively decreasing rate of adoption with a final level of adoption of 15% for the whole country and a discount rate of 12% annually.The cost-benefit analysis shows that it is highly desirable to mount a research program to improve the resistance of rice to high temperatures, giving a large net present value (Figure 3-7).CEA assesses the economic costs and the technical efficiency of different options to achieve some predetermined level of environmental quality. The analysis assists the decision-making process by allowing feedback from those affected by a proposed program or plan of action to revise the objectives as part of the process. CEA allows 6 DSSAT largely represents the effects of temperature on rice as its effect on the development rate, in which higher temperatures shorten the duration of the various growth stages. We arbitrarily altered the genetic coefficients in DSSAT to make a synthetic variety that was less sensitive to temperature by increasing the genetic coefficients P1 and P5 by 15%. Coefficient P1 is the time period [expressed as growing degree days (GDD) above a base temperature of 9 °C] from seedling emergence during which the rice plant is not responsive to changes in photoperiod. This period is also referred to as the basic vegetative phase of the plant. Coefficient P5 is the time period in GDD from the beginning of grain filling (3 to 4 days after flowering) to physiological maturity with a base temperature of 9 °C. the construction of curves of marginal cost, which are obtained by ordering all possible alternative actions according to their cost and their effect on the environmental factor under consideration. In the case of the reduction of GHG emissions in agriculture, the options can be modelled using the Cool Farm Tool (www.coolfarmtool.org/Home), a tool originally developed by Unilever and researchers at the University of Aberdeen to help growers measure and understand on-farm GHG emissions.Calculations of methane emissions reduction are based on empirical evidence collected from Colombian literature. Calculations of nitrogen/ yield relationships are based on modelling of potential yield under different treatments using the DSSAT CERES-Rice model. Quantifications of on-farm production in the different regions of Colombia are drawn from Fedearroz survey data.Data from the field have shown that flooded rice generates greater emissions of CH 4 than rice grown with intermittent irrigation (or irrigation interspersed with dry periods), which allows soil aeration and is unfavorable for the anaerobes that produce CH 4 . Flooded rice in Colombia is typically grown in the municipalities of Jamundí (Valle del Cauca) and Cúcuta (Santander). Substituting of intermittent irrigation for continuous flooding requires the following: (1) implementation of a system of monitoring and water use control at the level of the individual field; (2) training and field demonstrations of land preparation and the use of water budgeting balance; and (3) land preparation for more efficient water use. The cost to implement these measures is US$107/ha per year, which will reduce GHG emissions by 11.65 t CO 2 eq/ha per year in Cúcuta and 13.06 t CO 2 eq/ha per year in Jamundí. The estimated cost efficiency is $9.20/t CO 2 eq per ha per year in Cúcuta and $8.21/t CO 2 eq per ha per year in Jamundí. The maximum potential reduction of emissions is 197,050 t CO 2 eq/yr for Cúcuta and 66,810 t CO 2 eq/yr for Jamundí.Harvest residues are typically burned in the municipalities of Espinal (Tolima), Valledupar (Cesar), and Yopal (Casanare). Instead of burning, residues can be managed using minimum tillage and decomposition accelerators, which, including training, costs US$112 for Espinal and Valledupar, and $57 for Yopal. The reductions of GHG emissions are 0.95, 0.53, and 0.47 t CO 2 eq/ha per year for Espinal, Valledupar, and Yopal, respectively, with estimated cost efficiencies of $59, $104, and $120/t CO 2 eq per ha per year. The potential reduction of GHG emissions is 26,270 t CO 2 eq/yr for Espinal, 3,280 t CO 2 eq/yr for Valledupar, and 3,300 t CO 2 eq/yr for Yopal.There are many factors that affect rice's nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), or its ability to absorb and use nitrogen inputs. The result is often that more fertilizer is applied than can be used by the plant, or that not enough is applied to get maximum yields and economic returns. There are three possible approaches for increasing the efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer application to rice in Colombia, thereby reducing unnecessary inputs and decreasing emissions from crop fertilization (Figure 3-8). The first involves reducing overall nitrogen application, which increases NUE but entails reduction in rice yields (scenario A). The second requires no reduction or increase in nitrogen application, but requires more-effective management techniques so that what does get applied is used effectively by the plant (scenario B). The final approach involves both increasing nitrogen inputs and NUE through better management to arrive at optimum economic returns from the system (scenario C). All three scenarios are climate smart -they result in fewer emissions per ton of rice produced due to optimal N uptake -however we will only be analyzing scenario A for economic viability and relative eco-efficiency.It is possible to halve the rates of fertilizer applied to rice in two regions of Colombia: the Andean and Caribbean regions. The cost of this option is estimated using the following equation: where: The estimated costs of this option in terms of foregone production are: Andean, US$113/ha per year, and Caribbean, $183/ha per year. The expected reduction of GHG emissions are: Andean, 1.0 t CO 2 eq/ha per year, and Caribbean, 0.2 t CO 2 eq/ha per year. Nevertheless, the estimates of cost efficiency are $109 and $170/t CO 2 eq reduced for the Andean and Caribbean regions, respectively. The maximum potential reduction of GHG emissions is 76,170 and 2,920 t CO 2 eq/yr for the Andean and Caribbean regions, respectively.It is important to keep in mind that the yield reductions caused by decreased nitrogen inputs have further repercussions for global food security. There is a possibility that reducing N application in one region or country could simply displace GHG emissions to another, which would have to produce more to make up for the decrease in yield, a factor which was not taken into account in this analysis.The data for the three mitigation options in various departments in Colombia are summarized in Figure 3-9.The priority adaptation and mitigation interventions identified for the rice sector all involve optimization of resource inputs and outputs, be it fertilizers or water, or improved use of \"waste\" products. The economic analysis demonstrates the cost-benefit ratios of these interventions from a climate change mitigation perspective, but equally could consider these from a competitiveness perspective, or prioritize them based on ecoefficiency principles.Although the practices described above are already considered climate smart, our definition of the term leaves room for the possibility that, though a strategy may be climate smart, it may not necessarily be economically viable, environmentally sustainable, or make good use of resources. As noted by Keating et al. in Making use of some of the explicit measures noted by Keating et al. (Chapter 2 of this publication), we attempted to qualitatively evaluate the climate-smart adaptation and mitigation measures chosen for Colombia based on their relative eco-efficiency. A measure of eco-efficiency must be made with regard to the relation of inputs, such as labor, capital, nutrients, and water; with desired outputs, such as harvested product or economic profit. Table 3-3 gives a positive or negative value for the ecoefficiency measures to each of the 5 climatesmart practices; a negative value (red) is assigned when a practice requires more inputs (+) or results in less of the desired outputs (-), whereas a positive value (green) is assigned for a reduction in inputs (-) or increase in desired outputs (+). shows that not all of the climatesmart strategies chosen for Colombia are highly eco-efficient, though some are more so than others. For example, the composting of crop residues in the field instead of burning appears to be highly eco-efficient -as it both reduces the amount of input required in terms of labor, water, and soil nutrients, and increases outputs in the form of ecosystem services. This inference is confirmed by the cost-efficiency analysis, which shows that eliminating residue burning it is capable of greatly reducing GHG emissions at a very reasonable cost to the farmer.Despite the built-in uncertainties of global climate models, there is a reasonable amount of evidence to support the prediction that global temperatures could rise anywhere from 1 to 8 °C by 2050. Precipitation patterns are less predictable, though certain scenarios can predict with high certainty a global average increase of almost 23% by 2050, along with major changes in spatio-temporal distribution. Circumstances at the country level are similar, with Colombia predicted to undergo temperature increases between 1.4 and 2.5 °C by 2050, shifting distributions of rainfall, and a range of regional precipitation changes (-6 to +5%). The implications of these changes for world agriculture could be profound, with some 37 of the most important crops predicted to lose more than 50% of area currently classified as suitable for their cultivation. Colombia could experience losses in crop suitability in up to 83% of the country's total area, especially in the Amazon, Pacific, Caribbean, and Eastern Plains regions. In these regions, adaptation strategies will undoubtedly be necessary to cope with the impacts of decreased crop suitability.Economic analyses of preferred adaptation and mitigation strategies for Colombian agriculture give encouraging results. Both the adoption of an irrigation system and the development of a research program for heat-resistant rice are economically viable, and, in the latter case, highly profitable in the mid-term. Mitigation strategies offer a more mixed bag: replacing flooded rice with intermittent irrigation reduces emissions at a relatively low cost. Using minimum tillage and decomposition accelerators instead of burning residues greatly reduces emissions, but at a higher cost.Climate change necessitates the implementation of adaptation/mitigation measures to ensure food security. The critical question is whether these climate-smart strategies and measures that meet the standards of ecoefficiency are mutually inclusive. To be sure, many of the resources that eco-efficiency aims to manage prudently (water, nutrients, labor, finances, etc.) are the same resources that must be managed for adaptation/mitigation purposes. For example, using minimum tillage and decomposers in Colombian rice fields instead of burning crop residues after harvest is eco-efficient because it greatly reduces the inputs of water and labor required for conventional puddled transplanting systems while leaving yields virtually unaffected (Bhushan et al., 2007). The practice advances mitigation goals at the same time; omitting tillage and burning considerably reduces carbon emissions.Qualitatively evaluating the eco-efficiency of the climate-smart strategies chosen for Colombia in terms of the balance of inputs and outputs indicates that, while most eco-efficient practices are by default climate smart, not all climate-smart practices are necessarily highly eco-efficient. Instead, climate-smart practices display a range of compatibility with eco-efficient measures. While some, like the more precise application of nitrogen fertilizer, could result in significant reduction of inputs (soil nutrients, capital, labor, etc.) while augmenting desirable outputs, others may imply more labor, greater financial risk, or even unexpected environmental costs. Accordingly, those options which are a win for both system types should be emphasized in climate change planning to avoid the possibility of adaptation/mitigation coming at the price of efficiency and food security. Furthermore, climate financing could provide a boost to eco-efficient agriculture, thus opening the door for economic incentives to transform low-efficiency systems.Demand for food is expected to continue to increase for at least the next 40 years (Godfray et al., 2010), and food production will need to increase by 70 to 100% by 2050 (The World Bank, 2008). However, this has to be done in the face of growing competition for land, water, and energy, and without harming the environment. The objective must therefore be sustainable intensification of agricultural production (The Royal Society, 2009).Brazil is one of the countries with the highest potential of farmland expansion to meet the growing demand for food and biofuel (Brown, 2004), especially in the Cerrado region. The Cerrado is characterized by a savanna-like native vegetation of low trees, scrub brush, and grasses. It covers approximately 204 million hectares (Mha), or 23% of Brazil's land area (Bustamante et al., 2006). About 62% of this area (127 Mha) is suitable for agriculture (Lilienfein and Wilcke, 2003). Cultivated pastures in the Cerrado region cover about 66 Mha (Sano et al., 2000). An estimated 50 Mha are subjected to a process of degradation by excessive grazing (Silva et al., 2004;Klink et al., 2008).The Cerrado biome is the second largest vegetation formation after the Amazon, and also the world's richest in biodiversity (Mistry, 2000). The climate is characterized by two well-defined seasons: dry winters and rainy summers. Average temperature of the coldest month is about 18 ºC. The dry season extends from April to September; the relative humidity is low, enabling the occurrence of fires. Even in the rainy season from October to March, drought spells often occur, varying from 1 to 2 weeks and sometimes causing considerable losses to agricultural production. Latosols predominate, with good soil physical characteristics (high water infiltration, moderate water retention, and easy mechanization). The majority of the soils are acid, with high aluminum saturation, strong phosphorus retention, and poor nutrient contents. Those characteristics inhibited the development of the Cerrado for agriculture until modern times.The Cerrado became the leading edge of the expansion of the agricultural frontier in Brazil in the 1970s. Before that, only a small portion of dusky red latosols and structured \"terra roxa\" were considered suitable for agriculture-a little more than 5% of the total. However, from 1975 a federal government development program known as \"Polocentro\" allocated resources to develop technologies for profitable and productive agriculture in the Cerrado soils (Bittar, 2011).Traditionally, beef cattle production is a major source of income for many farmers in the Cerrado region (Klink and Moreira, 2002;Diniz-Filho et al., 2009). However, poor herd management, overgrazing, and lack of adequate nutrient replacement to the soil have led to declining productivity and reduced profitability of the system (Landers, 2007).There have been many challenges to developing sustainable agricultural systems in the Cerrados, chief among them the soil constraints. Natural low soil fertility and aluminum toxicity limit root development and mineral nutrition. Further, limited root systems turn plants more susceptible to short drought periods during the summer wet season. Liming and organic matter incorporation were key input to alleviate aluminum saturation, raise water retention capacity, stabilize soil aggregates, and increase soil macro biota activity. Research also advanced in developing new varieties adapted to these environmental characteristics. These varieties typically possess deep root systems, have high tolerance to aluminum toxicity, respond well to fertilization, are adapted to mechanization; besides having high resistance to insect pests, diseases, and hydric stress.In recent years the increasing demand for ethanol biofuel resulted in leasing land for sugarcane production being more profitable than raising beef cattle or even growing crops such as soybean and maize (Koh, 2007;Koh and Ghazoul, 2008). Although profitable in the short term this monoculture brings with it risks such as increasing incidence of pests and diseases, degradation of soil and natural resources, and declining yields. It also exposes farmers to dependence on a single income source: the ethanol processing plant.With those technological advancements, the region became the principal growing agricultural pole. Today Cerrado agriculture broadly employs modern technologies, and system productivity continues to climb.Agriculture and livestock production in the Cerrado region generates 42% of the agribusiness share of GDP in Brazil. Currently agribusiness contributes about 30% of the country's GDP, employs around 40% of the economically active population, and accounts for a large portion of the country's balance of trade surplus. One third of the country's grain production (soybeans, maize, sorghum, rice, wheat, coffee, etc.), half of the meat and most of the cotton output come from the Cerrados. A big share of that production is for export.Nonetheless, managing agriculture in the Cerrado biome is an ongoing learning process. When the stabilizing effects of diversity were replaced by simple systems such as monoculture, destabilizing factors showed their destructive potential. Intensive cultivation without crop rotation resulted in low yields, due mainly to destabilization of soil physical quality, and pest and disease infestations.According to Cunha et al. (2008), soil degradation is the main ambient threat to sustainability of agriculture in the Cerrado region. A large portion of the soils is compacted and susceptible to erosion when facing strong rainfall. Under these conditions, traditional techniques such as contour planting may be inadequate. This challenge led to the adoption of no-till systems, which increased soil cover and brought additional environmental benefits. In the early 1990s, the area under no till in the Brazilian Cerrado represented just 9% of the total; by the 1995/96 cropping season that percentage rose to 33%. In the same period, the total no-till area in Brazil grew 3.5 times, but in the Cerrados it increased 17 times (Marouelli, 2003).In spite of huge advances in productivity of agriculture and our understanding of the environmental risks, Brazil has a long way to go to transform the Cerrados into a biome that will sustainably support crop, animal, and forest production, with acceptable levels of profit to producers and safe, economic food supplies for urban consumers. Research on eco-efficient systems will drive that transformation.The Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply is promoting low-carbon agriculture as a means of reducing agricultural emissions of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). Besides offering financial support for farmers, the government promotes agricultural research through the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), and provides professional training to facilitate the diffusion of modern practices such as no till, use of biological nitrogen fixation, and technologies to revive degraded pastures.It is also promoting the Crop-Livestock-Forestry Integration System (CLFIS). CLFIS combines cropping, livestock, and forestry activities through approaches such as crop rotation, succession, double cropping, and intercropping, searching for synergistic effects among the components of the agroecosystems. One approach is to grow commercial crops such as soybeans, maize, or beans between rows of forest trees for the first 2 or 3 years after the trees have been planted. Thereafter, the area is planted with forages for livestock, in association with maize or sorghum. Once the pasture is established between the tree rows, it is grazed by livestock until the trees are ready for harvest. This diversification of economic activities minimizes the impact of climate or market changes on farm income. Integration of the system components minimizes use of agrochemicals, reduces the opening of new areas for crop or livestock production, and reduces environmental impacts, increasing biodiversity, reducing soil erosion, and improving soil structure and fertility, particularly in combination with conservation agriculture practices such as zero-tillage (Vilrla et al., 2003;Landers, 2007). Integrated crop, livestock, and forestry systems show particular promise in increasing the eco-efficiency of agricultural production (Wilkins, 2008), i.e., maximizing production while minimizing inputs such as land, water, nutrients, and energy (Keating et al., 2010).CLFIS is focused in the so called \"green agriculture\". This system combines cropping, livestock, and forestry activities to promote the recovery of degraded pastures. Each farm will have a varied production system, such as grains, fibers, meat, and milk and agro-energy. It also aims to improve soil fertility with the use of adequate cropping systems and techniques to optimize and intensify its use. Therefore, it allows the diversification of economic activities on farm, and minimizes income risks due to climate and/or market changes. The system consists in growing forest species simultaneously with commercial crops like soybeans, maize, or beans added for the first 2 or 3 years. After crop harvest, the area is planted with forages for livestock, associated with maize or sorghum. After grain harvesting, the pasture is already established between the tree rows, enabling grazing, until wood is harvested. Integration of different system components minimizes use of agrochemicals, reduces the opening of new areas for crop-livestock, and prevents environmental liabilities. It enables increases in biodiversity, and allows a better control of erosion through soil coverage. Integration, together with soil conservation practices such as no till, is an economic and sustainable alternative to raise yields in degraded areas. Other attributes of CLFIS are related to environmental compliance of the farm, maintenance and/or recovery of permanent preservation areas, and of 'legal reserves' (percentage of a forested property that needs to be set aside). The introduction of new technologies is aimed at eco-efficiencyminimizing environmental impact while improving production and profitability.A major challenge facing CLFIS is its dissemination and incorporation into the production chain and extension of benefits at the national level. It is necessary to invest in training, as well as to publish results for widespread knowledge dissemination.CLFIS should be: (1) technically efficient, using adequate management and inputs, and taking into account local conditions of the farms;(2) economically viable with a better use of land and other natural resources; (3) diversified; (4) socially acceptable, i.e., adaptable to any farm size, providing more consistent and higher income and improved agricultural competitiveness; and (5) environmentally fit through the use of soil conservation practices, and better land use.Intensification of production should not be synonymous for indiscriminate use of inputs; it should mean rational and efficient use of technologies to maximize profits, using natural resources rationally. For a certain level of production, resources (land, water, inputs) should be used with a minimal impact on the environment without sacrificing the bio-economic productive potential of the cropping-livestock activity. The efficient use of nutrients, agrochemicals, and energy along with the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission are key factors to enhance eco-efficiency of the system.A feasible alternative to effectively implement the CLFIS can be a partnership between grain producers and ranchers. Farmers who use sorghum and maize intercropped with Brachiaria spp. to obtain crop residues for no-till soil preparation could harvest that forage collected in the off season. To minimize capital costs in the purchase of animals, those farmers could establish partnerships with ranchers. Harvested grain residues could be used as feed supplement during the dry season, either in grazing or in confinement, besides using the forage obtained in the intercropping system.A common problem of intercropping forages and grains is competition for water and nutrients. Losses in crop yield and failures in pasture establishment may occur. There are alternatives to minimize that competition, such as delayed sowing of the pasture component and use of low doses of herbicides, as well as plant arrangement, to minimize the competition of the forage with the grain crop (Kluthcouski et al., 2003).Farms adopting the CLFIS may benefit from a better stability of forage production to feed the herd year around. During the wet season, pastures are more productive due to the higher soil fertility developed during the crop phase. During the dry season, crop residues and harvest byproducts, as well as the newly green established pastures are in adequate amounts and of good quality to provide weight gains. Weight loss is very common in the dry season on most farms of the Cerrado region.Good soil and ecosystems management practices are potentially capable of mitigating greenhouse anthropogenic gas emissions. In this sense the Cerrado region is capable of playing an important role in the carbon cycle equilibrium (see also Chapter 11 of this volume).Faced with this scenario, farmers are seeking alternative production systems that maximize the economic productivity of their land while minimizing risks. One such alternative is integrated crop, livestock, and forest production. This section presents a case study that evaluates and compares three different spatial arrangements of crops, livestock, and forestry.The study was located at Boa Vereda Farm, Cachoeira Dourada County, in the south of the State of Goiás (latitude 18°29'30\", longitude 49°28'30\") and average altitude of 459 m. The climate is typical of the tropical savanna type (Aw, according to Köppen classification), with welldefined wet and dry seasons. Annual average temperature is 24 o C, with an average annual rainfall of 1,340 mm, distributed from October to March. Soils are classified as dark red latosol, highly weathered, with low natural fertility.Much of Boa Vereda Farm consists of degraded pastures with low carrying capacity that are used to raise beef cattle. Income from livestock sales has been insufficient to invest in reclaiming the pastures.CLFIS demonstration plots were established on 17 ha in the 2008/09 cropping season and a further 27 ha in the 2009/10 cropping season. The land was cultivated twice using a disc harrow to incorporate lime and was then leveled, again using a disk harrow. Fertilizer was applied according to recommendations based on soil analyses. Weeds were controlled using herbicide and hoeing between tree rows up to the 12th month after planting. Pests were controlled using integrated pest management.In the establishment year (year 0), eucalyptus was planted in rows, and soybean was planted in the plots between the tree stands. In the following year (year 1), plots were sown with a maize/ Brachiaria grass intercrop, in accordance with the Santa Fe System (Kluthcouski et al., 2003). Cattle were introduced to the pasture 70 days after the maize was harvested. At this time (18 months after the plots were established), the eucalyptus was about 6 m tall with trunks 10 cm in diameter at chest height, allowing the entry of cattle without risk of damage to the trees. From this point on, the pasture was used for animal husbandry, particularly fattening beef cattle, until the eucalyptus was cut, which in this study was modeled as being between the fourth and the sixth year after planting.Three different planting arrangements were tested. Scenario 1 consisted of three rows of eucalyptus (stands), with 3 m between rows and 3 m between plants; the stands were spaced 14 m apart to allow for crops and pasture to be established between them. Thus, 62.5% of the land under scenario 1 was allocated to crop/ pasture and 37.5% to forest, with a tree density of 500 trees/ha. Scenario 2 consisted of four rows of eucalyptus spaced 3 m between rows and 3 m between trees, with 22 m between stands, giving 68% of the land allocated to crop/livestock and 32% to forest and a tree density of 430 trees/ha. Scenario 3 consisted of single rows of eucalyptus, with 1.5 m between trees within the row and 14 m between rows, giving 89% of the area allocated to crops/livestock and 11% to forest, with 476 trees/ha. The soybean cultivar used was BRS-GO 8360; maize cultivars were BRS 1030 and BRS 1035; and for the pasture Brachiaria brizantha cultivar 'Marandu' was used. Six clones of the Eucalyptus urograndis were used. Eucalyptus yield was estimated based on tree development in November 2010.The crossbred cattle used in the trial weighed an average of 242 kg when introduced to the plots. Supplementary concentrate feed was provided at a rate of 250 g/head per day in the dry season and 350 g/head per day in the wet season. Average carrying capacity was estimated at 2.1 animals/ha. With adequate management and fertilization, this stocking rate was assumed to be maintained until the eucalyptus was cut and the system reestablished. Prices for calves were set 10% higher than the price paid for adult animals, because the market pays more for young animals.The cost for pasture maintenance was based on the price paid locally for pasture rental (R$10.00/head per month; approximately US$18.40, February 2010 exchange rate). Other livestock production costs were purchase of supplementary feed and R$3.00/head per month for vaccines, labor, and veterinary supplies.Production costs were calculated up to harvest, including freight from the farm to the store.The opportunity cost for land was set at the value of ten 60 kg bags of soybean per hectare (US$168.48/ha), equal to the price paid by ethanol processing plants to lease land for sugarcane production.Data on farm operations and prices were collected in 2008/09 and 2009/10 cropping seasons from farmers and companies associated with agriculture. Net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and equivalent uniform annual net value (NUV) were calculated using an interest rate of 5.75%, the rate applied by banks run by the federal government.Production costs for scenario 1 are shown in Tables 4-1, 4-2, and 4-3, while Table 4-4 shows the yields achieved in all three scenarios. a. Scenario 1 consisted of three rows of eucalyptus (stands), with 3 m between rows and 3 m between plants; the stands were spaced 14 m apart to allow for crops and pasture to be established between them. Scenario 2 consisted of four rows of eucalyptus spaced 3 m between rows and 3 m between trees, with 22 m between stands. Scenario 3 consisted of single rows of eucalyptus, with 1.5 m between trees within the row and 14 m between rows.Table 4-5 shows cash flow for scenario 1, including the value of lumber for energy from the trees cut in the sixth year. In years 1 and 2 the annual cash flow balance was negative: costs exceeded income due to the high cost of establishing the eucalyptus. From year 3 onwards cash flow was positive as a result of income from the cattle and low maintenance costs for the eucalyptus.Scenario 3, with one row of eucalyptus with 14 m between rows and 1.5 m between trees, gave the best economic performance (Table 4-6), with the highest NUV being achieved if the trees were harvested in year 5. In scenarios 1 and 2, NUV was highest when the trees were harvested in year 6. These findings are in keeping with reports of similar studies elsewhere in Brazil (Dube et al., 2002;Yamada and Gholz, 2002), and demonstrate that integrated crop, livestock, and forestry systems are economically and technically feasible in the Cerrado. The system is flexible enough to be adapted to meet local environmental, social, and economic circumstances, and offers the prospect of sustainable, eco-efficient agricultural production.Much of the Cerrado is underutilized or degraded, and integrated crop, livestock, and forestry production offers an opportunity for raising productivity without harming the environment. In addition to producing food of high biological value (meat and milk), cultivated pasture provides other important environmental benefits, including long-term ground cover, which reduces erosion and promotes water infiltration; carbon fixation; increases in the soil organic matter content; and reduction in the emission of greenhouse gases.In the search to produce more food and energy within the constraints of available water, land, and other inputs; eco-efficient, climate-smart systems like integrated crop, livestock, and forestry systems have a vital role to play. The dry savannas of West Africa are undergoing rapid transformation of agricultural practices owing to the rapid human and livestock population growth, increase in agricultural intensification and accelerated climate change which has increased the incidence and severity of diseases, pests and drought. The major constraints to agricultural production in the savanna include poor soil fertility, pests and diseases of crops and livestock, parasitic weeds such as Striga hermonthica, drought, and competition between crops and livestock for resources. Inadequate policies, weak institutional mechanisms, and poor linkages among farmers, and researchers prevent adoption of improved agricultural technologies that can combat these constraints. The risk of continuous cultivation on these poor and fragile soils is huge. Integrating crop and livestock production offers ways to increase production while protecting the environment. Over the years, research and development institutions have generated several agricultural technologies to alleviate the majority of the production constraints in the West African savannas. However, most development organizations use traditional extension methods that result in poor adoption of the improved technologies. The integration of crop and livestock production is particularly desirable in intensively farmed and densely populated areas with access to urban markets. Proper integration of these practices will diversify smallholder income and increase food security. Integrated genetic and natural resource management provides the keys to improved eco-efficiency. This includes integrating pesticide use with cultural practices such as modified planting date and disease control; rotating/intercropping cereals and legumes; use of pest resistant\\tolerant cultivars to increase the effectiveness of pest control and reduce the need for pesticides; and improving soil fertility restoration/maintenance. Government and national institutions in West Africa are encouraged to scale out these technologies to wider areas for increased benefit to farmers through the use of proven extension methods.The lowland savannas of West Africa are characterized by elevation of less than 800 m, a growing period sufficient for most cereal and grain-legume crops, and a relatively high potential for livestock production. Agricultural production systems are intensifying across the region in response to increases in population pressure, demand, and opportunities for product marketing. In the dry savanna, defined as the area with a growing period of between et al., 2003). Throughout the Guinea and dry savannas of West Africa, farmers increasingly combine crop farming with livestock production (Tiffen, 2004). The integration of crop and livestock production is particularly noted in intensively farmed and densely populated areas with access to urban markets (Franke et al., 2010).Alongside the increase in cropping intensity, livestock numbers are also increasing in response to an increased demand for meat, milk, and other products. Delgado et al. (2001) estimated that demand for animal products in sub-Saharan Africa would increase by more than 250% between 2001 and 2020, with much of the increase being in West Africa. Intensification of crop-livestock systems in the region has resulted in shorter fallows than in traditional farming systems, and fallow periods are becoming too short to restore soil fertility and reduce pest pressure. Consequently, cropping and grazing have expanded onto marginal lands, increasing competition between cropping and livestock production and increasing demand for crop residues as livestock feed.The major constraints to agricultural production in the savanna include poor soil fertility (including low soil organic matter (SOM) content in intensified cropping systems), pests and diseases of crops and livestock, parasitic weeds such as Striga hermonthica (Delile) Benth. (purple witchweed), drought, and competition between crops and livestock for resources. Inadequate policies, weak institutional mechanisms, and poor linkages among farmers, development agencies, and researchers prevent adoption of improved agricultural technologies that can combat these constraints. Most development organizations use traditional extension methods that result in poor adoption of improved technologies.Crop production in the West African dry savanna is limited by the inherently low fertility of most of the soils. In the past, farmers depended on fallow periods to restore soil fertility, but current fallow periods are not long enough to replace exported nutrients (Bado et al., 2012). Stoorvogel et al. (1993) estimated annual nutrient loss from sub-Saharan African soils is at 22 kg N, 2.5 kg P, and 15 kg K/ha in 1982-84, and 26 kg N, 3 kg P, and 19 kg K/ha in 2000. This underscores the extent of nutrient mining and the need to mobilize strategies to conserve soil fertility.SOM plays an important role in sustaining soil fertility by contributing to several soil properties, including cation exchange capacity, water-holding capacity, buffer capacity, and soil structure. Higher levels of SOM could also raise the efficiency with which mineral fertilizer is used by plants. However, SOM is very low in most savanna soils, averaging 6.8 g/kg (Jones, 1973), compared with 20-100 g/kg for most soils (Bot and Benites, 2005). Increasing SOM contents is therefore considered a prerequisite for increased crop production in the savanna. This can be achieved by growing crop varieties that produce large amounts of above-ground biomass, incorporating residues in the soil where the crop was grown, concentrating plant residues on a limited cropped area, and corralling livestock on crop fields so that they deposit urine and manure on the cropland (Bationo and Mokwunye, 1991;Powell et al., 2004;Valbuena et al., 2012).Nitrogen (N) is the most limiting nutrient in soil. In the savannas, considerable amounts of soil-available N are released with the onset of rains but its uptake by crops is insignificant due to the low N requirements of plants at early growth stages (Kamara et al., 2005). As a result, much of this N is lost through leaching. Phosphorus (P) is the second most limiting nutrient in the savanna soils of West Africa, and in some areas, plantavailable P may be as low as 2 mg P/kg (Bray 1) (equivalent to approximately 4 kg P/ha) (Kwari et al., 1999). Most of these savanna soils also contain large amounts of iron and aluminum oxides, which contribute to the removal of P from the soil solution. Because P is not a renewable resource, the soil P pools can be replenished only through external P inputs. In addition, the acidity that is generated through crop removal and leaching can lead to the loss of calcium (Ca), magnesium, and potassium (K), and toxic levels of soluble manganese and aluminum.Although mineral fertilizers can be used to replace nutrient losses, socio-economic constraints such as high prices and lack of credit limit their use. Smallholder farmers commonly apply too little fertilizer, either because they cannot afford more or because fertilizers are not readily available. Moreover, most fertilizers applied contain N, P, and K, albeit in inadequate quantities. Applying these fertilizers initially increases yields, but this accelerates depletion of other soil nutrients such as sulfur, copper, and zinc, ultimately reducing response to NPK fertilizer and reducing crop productivity (Kwari et al., 2009). Thus, both mineral fertilizers and organic inputs are required to improve soil fertility (Vanlauwe et al., 2002;Powell et al., 2004).Other problems include physical deterioration of soils, such as crusting (Oldeman, 1994), which reduces water infiltration, increases runoff, reduces oxygen diffusion to seedlings, inhibits plant growth, and reduces soil biological activity, and the breakdown of soil aggregates, which increases soil erosion. There is thus a great challenge to protect and manage land and soil resources to maintain their productivity and to contribute to food security.Increased use of organic and inorganic fertilizers, together with diversification of cropping to include legumes are important tools in restoring or sustaining soil fertility of the intensifying cropping systems of the dry savannas of West Africa (Vanlauwe et al., 2001;Sanginga et al., 2003;Franke et al., 2004). These so-called \"balanced nutrient management systems\" can be further enhanced through the use of improved cultivars that are drought tolerant and use available nutrients efficiently, such as maize cultivars developed at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nigeria (Kamara et al., 2005). This approach has come to be known as integrated soil fertility management (ISFM). ISFM is not characterized by unique field practices, but is rather a fresh approach to combining available technologies in ways that preserve soil quality while promoting its productivity (Sanginga and Woomer, 2009).Insect pests are a major constraint to legume production, particularly cowpea in the dry savannas of West Africa (ICIPE, 1980;Singh and Allen, 1980;Singh et al., 1990;Rusoke and Rubaihayo, 1994). Indeed, Jackai et al. (1985) assert that it is not feasible to grow cowpea commercially in the West African savanna without using insecticide. In a recent study, Kamara et al. (2007) reported that flower thrips [Megalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom)], the legume pod borer (Maruca vitrata), and a range of pod-feeding bugs were the major insect pests of cowpea in the dry savannas of West Africa. Thrips start to attack at flower initiation, causing flower bud abortion (Akingbohungbe, 1982). Pod borer larvae damage flower buds, flowers, green pods, and seeds (Singh and Jackai, 1985). Adults and nymphs of pod bugs remove sap from green pods, causing abnormal pod and seed formation (Singh and Jackai, 1985). High levels of insect resistance are not available in current cultivars (Oghiakhe et al., 1995), hence integrated insect pest management is key to successful cowpea production (Ajeigbe and Singh, 2006;Kamara et al., 2010).The most important diseases of cowpea in the dry savannas of West Africa are bacterial blight (Xanthomonas sp.), leaf spot (Septoria spp.), and scab (Sphaceloma sp.) (Emechebe and Florini, 1997;Hampton et al., 1997).In West Africa, groundnut yields are traditionally low, due to several constraints including pests and diseases. Aphids (Aphis craccivora) are a serious pest as well as a vector of virus diseases, such as the rosette, a major constraint to groundnut production, particularly in the dry regions. Groundnut rosette disease (GRD), early leaf spot (ELS), late leaf spot (LLS), and rust are the major biotic constraints responsible for low yield of groundnut in West Africa (Ntare et al., 2008). Groundnut rosette is one of the most important diseases that wiped out more than half of the groundnut cropped area in Nigeria in the mid 1970s. From 1992, ICRISAT and national partners in Nigeria embarked on a large hybridization program to develop early maturing rosette-resistant varieties that would fit into the Sudano-Sahelina savanna zones of Nigeria. From this program, a total of 44 new varieties with resistance to groundnut rosette were tested (Mayeux et al., 2003). Three varieties SAMNUT 21, SAMNUT 22, and ICGV-IS 96894 (SAMNUT 23) were formally released in 2001 and ICIAR 19BT (SAMNUT 24) was released in 2011.Infection by Aspergillus flavus on groundnut (and its products) is the main food safety concern. Aflatoxin contamination causes cancer to humans and animals and has thus adversely affected international trade in groundnuts in many producing countries (Ntare et al., 2008). Resistant cultivars provide the most appropriate means of control of diseases, especially for smallholder farmers. Therefore, development of rosette-and/or ELS resistant, high-yielding groundnut varieties with appropriate duration is important to enhance and stabilize productivity. Early planting and dense close spacing are effective cultural practices. Early planting allows plants to start flowering before aphids appear. Dense planting provides a barrier to aphids penetrating in from field edges, discourages population build-up of aphids and reduces incidence of \"rosette\" disease. Other diseases of groundnut include: bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) and damping-off diseases (Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani). In some locations, termites are serious field and storage pests. Species of Microtermes and Odontotermes are the most damaging, while Macrotermes cause occasional damage. The small-sized Microtermes spp., in particular, attack and invade growing groundnut plants through the roots and stem near ground level, hollowing them out and causing the plants to wilt and die with a consequent reduction in crop stand. Stored groundnuts are attacked by moths (Ephestia cautella, Plodia interpunctella, Cadra cautella), and beetles (Caryedon serratus, Tribolium castaneum, Trogoderma granarium). The larvae of moths and the grubs and adult beetles bore into and damage seeds. Moths cause extensive webbing. The bruchid beetle Caryedon serratus is the major pest of groundnut in pod shell in West Africa. A good postharvest pest management program based on good storage practices is very important.Insect pests constitute an important factor limiting grain sorghum production in West Africa. Several species of insect pests attack sorghum at the different stages of its development. Several lepidopterous stem borers inflict considerable losses in sorghum. Intercropping cereals with legumes has shown to reduce stem borer attack and damage in sorghum (Amoako-Atta et al., 1983;Ampong-Nyarko et al., 1994) and has been recommended as a component of integrated pest management for small-scale resource limited farmers. Insect pests attacking panicles of sorghum and millet are especially damaging as they affect crop development at a late stage and have direct harmful quantitative and qualitative effects on grain yields. At this late stage of crop development, the main production inputs would have already been made, which maximizes economic losses and there is also little scope for the crop to compensate for damage done close to harvest. Sorghum midge (Contarinia sorghicola) is the most wide spread and damaging insect species attacking sorghum. It occurs almost everywhere that the crop is grown. Sharma (1993) reported that substantial progress has been made in utilizing resistance to midge. Millet head miner (Heliocheilus albipunctella) is the most important pest in West Africa. Nwanze and Sivakumar (1990) reported crop losses on farmers fields up to 41% with a mean of 20% based on field surveys in Burkina Faso, Niger, and northern Nigeria. Other important insect pests include shoot fly and aphids.Several fungi and viral diseases also attack sorghum and millet crops in West Africa. Grain mold caused by several fungal pathogens can reduce grain quality or destroy seeds. Stem rot and leaf diseases caused by an array of fungal and bacterial diseases cause spots or stripes on leaves which can result in death of the leaf (House, 1987). Downy mildew (DM) caused by an obligate parasite Sclerospora graminicola is quite widespread and economically the most important disease of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in India and several countries in Africa (Thakur et al., 2008). Severely infected plants are generally stunted and do not produce ear heads. Resistant varieties and other cultural practices are the most important control measures under smallholder farming systems of West Africa.The major insect pest problems on maize in the West African savannas are the stem borers, (Busseola fusca and Sesemia calamistis); and army worms (Spodoptera exempta and Helicoverpa armigera). The stem borer attack is usually more serious in late-maturing maize than the early cultivars. They cause two types of damage to the plants. First is mechanical damage due to consistent feeding in the stem, weakening it, and thus rendering the stems susceptible to lodging and withering (dead-heart). Secondly, stem borers may cause characteristic perforations or windows on leaves called 'fenestrations' seen when the sheath opens, exposing the perforations (Bosque-Pérez and Schulthess, 1998). This type of damage reduces the photosynthetic area of the leaves resulting in poor cereal yield, especially during high infestation.In a survey for incidence and severity of diseases in both the northern and southern Guinea savannas of Nigeria, Adeoti (1992) reported the occurrence of common foliar diseases such as the rust induced by Puccinia spp, Turcicum blight, Curvularia leaf spot, and Maydis blight. Other important maize diseases occurring in the savanna ecological zones include smut (Ustilago maydis), downy mildews, maize leaf fleck, and maize streak.Integrated pest management-integrating biological control, cultural practices such as modified planting date, disease-and pest-tolerant cultivars, and pesticides where necessary-can increase the effectiveness of pest control and reduce overuse of pesticides. Manipulation of planting date with a judicious use of insecticides has been found to be profitable (Kamara et al., 2010). Efforts are being made to develop biological control methods to control insect pests (e.g., Wajnberg et al., 2001;Neuenschwander et al., 2003;van Driesche et al., 2008). However, further efforts are needed to develop crop cultivars that are resistant to or tolerant of the major pests and diseases of the West African savannas in order to promote sustainable, eco-efficient agriculture in the region.The major pests and diseases affecting livestock in the West African savanna region include anthrax, black leg, contagious bovine and caprine pleuropneumonias, dermatophilosis, ectoparasites, gastrointestinal parasites, heartwater, liverfluke, respiratory complexes, and trypanosomiasis (Perry et al., 2002). High prevalence of diseases and parasites causes high mortality in sheep and goats, especially in kids and lambs. Preweaning mortality of up to 40% has been recorded with kids and lambs in Nigeria, but levels may be higher under extensive systems (Ademosun, 1994). Parasites may aggravate other conditions, such as nutritional stress, and increase susceptibility to disease, especially in young animals.Livestock health can be improved in smallholder systems by application of simple, low-cost, and well-proven techniques. These include control of pests, parasites, and diseases using traditional or modern veterinary medicines or husbandry practices (see, for example, Okoli et al., 2010), tolerant breeds of livestock, improved feeding, and hygienic housing and handling facilities. The improvements in productivity achieved by implementing such approaches can be dramatic. Van Vlaenderen (1985;1989), for example, demonstrated increases in ewe productivity of nearly 300% (from 7.2 kg lamb/ewe per year to 28.7 kg lamb/ewe per year) through improved flock management, simple health control, mineral supplementation, and strategic supplementation at the end of the rainy season. However, encouraging widespread adoption of these improved husbandry practices will require investment in policies, markets, and extension services (McDermott et al., 2010).Parasitic flowering plants (Striga and Alectra spp.) pose a serious threat to cereal and legume production in the dry savannas. It is estimated that 40 million hectares of land are severely infested by Striga spp., while nearly 70 million hectares have moderate levels of infestation (Lagoke et al., 1991).Striga hermonthica (Delile) Benth. (purple witchweed) is one of the most severe constraints to cereal production in the dry savannas of West Africa (Oswald and Ransom, 2004), attacking millet, sorghum, maize, and upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Kim et al., 1997;Showemimo et al., 2002). In northeast Nigeria, over 85% of fields planted to maize and sorghum were infested with purple witchweed (Dugje et al., 2006). Striga infestation can result in total loss of the crop (Lagoke et al., 1991;Oikeh et al., 1996) and may force farmers to abandon their cereal fields. The increasing incidence of Striga has been attributed to poor soil fertility and structure, intensification of land use through continuous cultivation and an expansion of cereal production (Vogt et al., 1991;Rodenburg et al., 2005;van Ast et al., 2005).Striga gesnerioides (Willd.) Vatke (cowpea witchweed) and Alectra vogelii (Benth.) (yellow witchweed) cause substantial yield reduction in cowpea in the dry savannas of sub-Saharan Africa (Emechebe et al., 1991). In a survey of 153 cowpea fields in six countries in West Africa, 40% were found to be infested with Striga (Cardwell and Lane, 1995), while in northeast Nigeria, where cowpea is the most important cash crop, Dugje et al. (2006) found 81% of cowpea fields surveyed to be infested with Striga, leading to serious crop losses. Cowpea yield losses associated with cowpea witchweed has been reported to range between 83 to 100% (Emechebe et al., 1991;Cardwell and Lane, 1995). Both parasites are difficult to control because they produce large numbers of seeds and up to 75% of the crop damage is done before they emerge from the ground.The abandonment of long-term fallows as a result of increasing cropping intensity has removed one of the key traditional practices used to control parasitic weeds. The primary approaches to management of parasitic weeds now available are the use of tolerant or resistant cultivars, and agronomic practices such as crop rotation.Striga damage in cereal crops can be reduced by growing varieties of maize (Zea mays), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) that are tolerant of or resistant to Striga or by planting trap crops such as varieties of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea), soybean (Glycine max), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), and sesame (Sesamum indicum) that stimulate Striga seed to germinate without providing a viable host (Carsky et al., 2000). Some studies have shown that applying N fertilizer reduces Striga emergence and population and boosts cereal grain yield (Kim et al., 1997;Showemimo et al., 2002;Oswald and Ransom, 2004;Kamara et al., 2009). Applying N fertilizer may not be feasible as a stand-alone solution to managing purple witchweed in cereals because of the high cost of fertilizer, but the combined use of N fertilizer and Striga-tolerant/resistant maize and sorghum varieties has shown promise in the West African savannas (Showemimo et al., 2002;Kamara et al., 2009). In addition, farmers have developed a range of coping strategies including hand-roguing, application of inorganic fertilizer, manures and composts, and crop rotations (Emechebe et al., 2004).However, control is most effective if a range of practices are combined into a program of integrated Striga control (ISC) that can provide sustainable control over a wide range of biophysical and socio-economic environments (Berner et al., 1997;Ellis-Jones et al., 2004;Franke et al., 2006;Kamara et al., 2008). Ellis- Jones et al. (2004) showed that growing Strigaresistant maize after a soybean trap crop more than doubled economic return compared with continuous cropping with local (nonresistant) maize. Franke et al. (2006) found that ISC that combined rotation of Striga-resistant maize, trap crops, and fertilizer application reduced the Striga soil seed bank by 46% and increased crop productivity by 88%, while Kamara et al. (2008) showed that these practices reduced Striga infestation and damage on farmers fields and increased productivity by more than 200%. The latter also found that the use of a participatory research and extension approach improved community and group cohesion and relationships between farmers and extension agents, resulting in farmer-to-farmer transfer of knowledge and widespread adoption of ISC.A range of technologies have been tested for controlling Striga and yellow witchweed in cowpea, including cultural practices, chemical control, biological control, and host plant resistance (Singh and Emechebe, 1997). Among these, the use of resistant varieties is the most feasible, sustainable, and appropriate solution. Several cowpea varieties resistant to Striga and yellow witchweed have been released to farmers in Africa, including IT89KD-374 (Sangaraka) and IT89KD-245 (Korobalen) in Mali; IT90K-76, IT90K-82-2, and IT97K-499-35 in Nigeria; and IT90K-59 in South Africa (Singh, 2002).There is a clear trend of decreasing rainfall and increasing temperatures in the dry savannas of West Africa (Dai et al., 2004). According to projections by van den Born et al. (2000), by 2050 temperature in West Africa will be 1.5 to 2.5 °C higher than at present and precipitation 100 to 400 mm/yr lower. Current vegetation zones will shift towards the South, as will aridity. Jagtap (1995) showed that annual rainfall in Nigeria declined between 1961-70 and 1981-90, with delays in the onset of the rainy season and reduction in early rainfall, which shortened the growing season by nearly one month. There were fewer wet days and higher rainfall intensities in most of the country. The rainfall series showed prolonged dry periods, especially since 1970. The rainfall decline is unprecedented in duration, spatial, temporal character, and seasonal expression. Some 21% of the maize area in sub-Saharan Africa often suffers from drought stress (Heisey and Edmeades, 1999). Drought is also the main abiotic constraint responsible for low and unstable yields in groundnut. Drought also increases the probability of aflatoxin contamination on groundnut and its products. In the dry savanna zone of West Africa, the probability of drought is highest at the start and end of the growing season, but the timing of deficits is unpredictable. Because of this, the effects of drought cannot be avoided by either genotype maturity or planting date. Decreasing the susceptibility of a crop to drought, while maintaining or increasing yield in good rainfall years, would increase and stabilize rural incomes, reduce the chronic food shortages that plague these areas prior to harvest, and lessen the risk of farming.There is growing consensus that restoration of soil fertility and conservation of soil and water resources are the starting points for agricultural transformation and development in West Africa (Rockström et al., 2010;Vanlauwe et al., 2010;Bationo et al., 2011;Oduol et al., 2011). Several strategies have been developed for the conservation of soil and water to maintain productivity in West Africa, including rainwater harvesting, live barriers, supplementary irrigation, minimum tillage, mulching, bunded basins, and tree planting (Drechsel et al., 2004).A central approach to increasing crop production in the dry savanna is planting well-adapted cultivars at the optimum date. The short growing season and frequent droughts in the dry savanna require early-and extra-earlymaturing crop cultivars with drought tolerance. Breeders at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and partner institutions have developed maize, cowpea, and soybean cultivars that are early maturing; tolerant to drought, high temperatures, and low soil nutrient contents; and are resistant to pests and diseases (see, for example, Badu-Apraku et al., 2005;Kamara et al., 2005;Menkir et al., 2009).Among the tremendous challenges facing agriculture in the dry savannas of West Africa, is the need to generate enough food for people and feed for animals without destroying the natural resource base. Traditional farming systems are breaking down under human and livestock population pressure. Competition is increasing between crops and livestock, particularly for land and labor (Okoruwa et al., 1996). In subhumid ecological zones, rangelands are rapidly being converted to cropland (McIntire et al., 1992) with consequent shrinkage of traditional livestock grazing areas. As a result, livestock increasingly depend on crop residue for feed. Also, as savanna zones are progressively transformed from the traditional extensive fallow systems to continuous cropping, yields of crops and land productivity are declining and sustainability is threatened. Integration of crop and livestock offers a viable approach to sustainable intensification of land use (Ajeigbe et al., 2001), since cultivated areas can support more livestock during the dry season than non-cultivated areas if the crop residues are judiciously used. Van Raay (1975) reported that in the semi-arid areas of northern Nigeria, cattle resident in farming areas are better able to meet their protein requirement than transhumant cattle. However, as shown in Table 5-1, the use of crop residues as fodder removes soil nutrients (Powell and Williams, 1995), as does the harvesting and removal of grain and fodder (Mortimore et al., 1997).Livestock have a vital role to play in maintaining or increasing the yields of cereals and certain cash crops in the dry savannas of West Africa, through provision of animal traction and organic fertilizer and diversification of production systems (Harrison, 1991;CIRAD, 1996;Smith et al., 1997;Brock et al., 2002;Williams et al., 2004;Franke et al., 2010). CIRAD (1996) noted that a farmer who works his or her land by hand can cultivate only 0.4 ha, but can cultivate 5 ha with the help of two oxen. Dual-purpose (food and feed) cowpeas, groundnuts, and other leguminous crops can provide food for humans, feed for livestock, and supply of nitrogen to the soil (Singh et al., 2003). Singh and Ajeigbe (2007) and Ajeigbe et al. ( 2010) documented the benefits of an improved cereal-legume-livestock system adopted by 20,000 farmers in the savanna zone in Nigeria and Niger. Stall-feeding sheep and goats with cereal and legume stover during the dry season increased liveweight gains and animal fertility, increased the quality of manure that the farmers could collect and return to their fields, and allowed closer monitoring of animal health, increasing the overall productivity of the system. The system also resulted in positive residual soil N contributions to following crops, boosting crop yields (Sanginga et al., 2003).In the past decade, it has been recognized that farmers in mixed crop-livestock systems sometimes value the crop residues as much as the grain owing to their importance as a feed for livestock, particularly in the dry season (Blümmel et al., 2003;Blümmel and Rao, 2006). Breeding programs for these crops are increasingly being adapted to include breeding for residue quality without compromising grain yield.Utilization of crop residues as livestock feed is, however, not without implications for crop production (Giller et al., 2009;Valbuena et al., 2012). For example, Kang (1993) showed that crop-residue management could affect cowpea grain yield. Use of crop residue as mulch together with application of fertilizer gave significantly higher grain yield than fertilizer without crop residue. Where crop residue and weeds are collected and used as fodder, the resulting animal manure should be returned and used as fertilizer. Singh and Ajeigbe (2000) showed that row planting of two rows of cereal interspersed with four rows of cowpea produced more grain and better-quality fodder than the traditional system of alternating rows of cereal and legume. This so-called \"strip cropping\" allows the two crops to be cultivated independently but provides for them to interact agronomically (Ajeigbe et al., 2005).Clearly, there is a continuing need to develop improved integrated crop-livestock systems that minimize competition for scarce resources (particularly land and labor) and maximize the synergies between the components (Figure 5-1).Many technologies have been developed that have the potential to increase agricultural production in West Africa, but their adoption by farmers remains limited (Bationo and Baidu-Forson, 1997;Diouf et al., 1998;Ndjeunga and Bantilan, 2005). Researchers have identified a range of technical, socio-economic, institutional, and policy constraints to technology uptake, including weak extension services, weak markets for both inputs and outputs, and poor infrastructure. For instance, extension recommendations are sometimes inappropriate or ineffective. The promotion of manure application without warning that it may reduce yields under limited rainfall is a case in point (Affholder, 1994). Likewise, use of mineral fertilizers is widely promoted by research and development organizations as a blanket recommendation irrespective of zonal, climatic, and geological diversity (Diouf et al., 1998). Often a technology that worked well on station has not been adapted to farmers' conditions.Poor communications among farmers, extension agents, and researchers has often led to poorly targeted research or to the poor adoption of promising options generated by research. Extension workers are expected to disseminate agricultural knowledge and technologies to rural communities, which include production, postharvest, and livestock issues, yet they do not possess adequate knowledge in all these areas. The lack of continuing education opportunities is a drawback to extension workers' performance. This poor performance of extension efforts calls for fresh approaches (Mercoiret et al., 2003). For example, farmer-participatory research and participatory learning have been adopted to make research results more understandable and useful to target groups (Farrington and Martin, 1988;Chambers et al., 1989;van de Fliert and Braun, 2002).Participatory extension models, such as farmer field schools and local agricultural research committees, make agricultural technologies quickly available and easily accessible in farming communities and enable participating organizations to gain experience in developing researcher-farmer-extension partnership (Braun et al., 2000).Crop-livestock systems are intensifying in the dry savannas of West Africa because of increasing population pressure. Despite the high potential for crop and livestock production, the intensification of land use systems faces increasing biotic and abiotic constraints. Poor soil fertility, parasitic weed infestation, drought, pests, and diseases are major constraints to food and feed production in the dry savannas. Over the years, research institutions have developed and disseminated component technologies that can improve system productivity when deployed in an integrated manner. Government and national institutions in West Africa are encouraged to scale out these technologies to wider areas for increased benefit to farmers. Agricultural intensification is a necessity in the densely populated areas of sub-Saharan Africa and certainly so in the Great Lakes region of Central Africa, the operational domain of the Consortium for Improving Agriculture-based Livelihoods in Central Africa (CIALCA). The integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) paradigm has been accepted by the research and development community, including the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), as a viable set of principles to foster agricultural intensification. In this paper we first describe the production environment of CIALCA's mandate areas and its impact on livelihood characteristics and constraints on enhanced productivity.We then develop the definition of ISFM and evaluate its relation with eco-efficiency principles. ISFM components are illustrated with data from various cropping systems in the mandate areas and specific reference is made to issues of dissemination and the creation of an enabling environment for the uptake of ISFM technologies. We found that ISFM principles are relevant for increasing system productivity within the Great Lakes region but that unfavorable conditions for their uptake are a major impediment to their potential impact. CIALCA and future initiatives should simultaneously invest in the development and evaluation of ISFM practices and the creation of an environment that favors their uptake. and Rwanda. This paper focuses on the seven areas located in the highlands of Burundi, Rwanda, and South Kivu Province in eastern DR Congo (Figure 6-1A). These areas lie at altitudes varying between about 850 meters above sea level (masl) in the Rusizi Plains near Lake Tanganyika to over 2000 masl in some of the higher parts of Gitega (Burundi) and South Kivu (DR Congo). These areas have some of the highest population densities in Africa, with the average ranging between 238 people/km 2 in Kigali-Kibungo (Rwanda) and 514 people/km 2 in Gitarama (Rwanda) (Figure 6-1B).All mandate areas contain highland perennial systems following the farming systems classification of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (Dixon et al., 2001). More than half of the farmers in the mandate areas grow banana, maize, cassava, and bush or climbing beans (Ouma and Birachi, 2011). The length of growing period varies As a result of these biophysical features, farms in the mandate areas are relatively small, contain a diverse range of crops, are labor limited, have varying but low numbers of livestock, and use very few external inputs such as improved varieties, fertilizer, or pesticides (Table 6-1). Only in Gitega does a considerable proportion of households use fertilizer (Table 6-1). Utilization of improved crop varieties is limited, with improved banana varieties used by 0-19% of households, improved groundnut and soybean varieties by 0-6% of households, improved cassava varieties by 0-16% of households, and improved maize varieties by 0-24% of households (Ouma and Birachi, 2011). The only exception is improved bean varieties, which are used by 5-91% of households in the mandate areas. Most households (50-85%) sell their agricultural produce at the farm gate or in local markets (Ouma and Birachi, 2011). Only in South Kivu do 20% of the households visit a regional market. Between 60 and 90% of the households sell fresh food products, while 10-25% of households sell processed products (Ouma and Birachi, 2011).In many densely populated areas of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), fallow periods are no longer an option and organic resources are scarce. This has commonly resulted in large variability in soil fertility between fields within a single farm. These \"soil fertility gradients\" are created by the position of specific fields within a soil-scape (Deckers, 2002), by the selective allocation of available nutrient inputs to specific crops and fields, and by improved management (e.g., time of planting, weeding, etc.) of plots with higher fertility (Tittonell et al., 2005b). In the CIALCA mandate areas, large differences in crop productivity over relatively short distances can be observed. For instance, in East Province of Rwanda, bean yields without inputs varied between less than 50 kg/ha and more than 2000 kg/ha (Figure 6-3A).An important consequence of the production environment and its many constraints, as described above, is substantial food insecurity. Between 38% and 72% of all households often have too little to eat and more than 80% of the households consume a maximum of two meals per day (Table 6-2). Over 70% of the households consume vegetable protein on a daily basis, over 80% of households consume animal protein only once a week or less often (Ouma and Birachi, 2011). Since agricultural outputs are limited, 29% to 73% of the adult population is involved part time or full time in off-farm activities, resulting in substantial off-farm income for most households. Literacy levels are relatively high, with between 52 and 84% of the household heads having completed at least primary education (Table 6-2).In terms of gender relationships, women contribute significantly to agricultural activities (Table 6-2). Both men and women are involved in crop management, though dominance of one gender is evident in certain enterprises in some mandate areas. In most cases, women dominate management of staple crops such as beans and cassava that are largely targeted for home consumption. Gender dominance in banana management is not evident, except in South Kivu where it is male dominated. In some of the mandate areas, banana cultivation is largely male dominated while harvest activities are dominated by women. The poor security environment and inefficient government structures during the past few decades have forced farmers to support one another, and this is reflected in substantial levels of social capital as illustrated by household membership of a farmer group (14-45%) or a credit and savings group (3-46%) (Table 6-2).In most communities in SSA, access to resources is not homogeneous, with some households having greater access to, for instance, land, labor, livestock, and capital, than others (Tittonell et al., 2005a). This is also the case for the farming households within the CIALCA mandate areas (Ouma and Birachi, 2011). Households with greater resource endowment commonly have a wider range of options to improve productivity and are less risk averse (Shepherd and Soule, 1998). This needs to be considered when identifying best soil management practices. Major constraints to eco-efficient intensification can be identified for various system goals: • Enhanced equity: Women manage most of the household food security crops, while men most often manage cash crops. Men take most decisions on investments in agriculture and control income from sales, while women implement most labor-intensive field activities.These constraints are exacerbated by the lack of effective extension systems, the lack of a conducive policy environment, and the lack of conditions that enable farmers to move from subsistence to commercial agriculture. The main exception is Rwanda where, over the past 15 years, institutional and policy-related changes have created a production environment that is well-placed to tackle constraints through investments in input value chains for improved seeds and fertilizer, provision of access to credit, initiatives to increase cattle ownership and to empower women, and the creation of an effective extension system.The Green Revolution in South Asia and Latin America boosted crop productivity through the deployment of improved varieties, water, and fertilizer. However, efforts to achieve similar results in SSA largely failed (Okigbo, 1987). The need for sustainable intensification of agriculture in SSA has gained support in recent years, especially in densely populated areas where natural fallows are no longer an option, as is the case in the African Great Lakes region. There is a growing recognition that farm productivity is a major entry point to overcoming rural poverty. A recent landmark event was the launching of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) (Annan, 2008). Since fertilizer is an expensive commodity, AGRA has adopted integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) as a framework for boosting crop productivity through reliance on soil fertility management technologies, with emphasis on increased availability and use of mineral fertilizer.We define ISFM as \"a set of soil fertility management practices that necessarily include the use of fertilizer, organic inputs, and improved germplasm combined with the knowledge on how to adapt these practices to local conditions, aiming at maximizing agronomic use efficiency of the applied nutrients and improving crop productivity. All inputs need to be managed following sound agronomic principles\" (Vanlauwe et al., 2011). The goal of ISFM is optimized crop productivity through maximizing interactions that occur when fertilizers, organic inputs, and improved germplasm and the required associated knowledge are integrated by farmers (Figure 6-4).The definition focuses on maximizing the efficiency with which fertilizer and organic inputs are used since these are both scarce resources in the areas where agricultural intensification is needed. Agronomic efficiency (AE) is defined as incremental return to applied inputs:where Y F and Y C refer to yields (kg/ha) in the treatment where nutrients have been applied and in the control plot, respectively, and F appl is the amount of fertilizer and/or organic nutrients applied (kg/ha).Note that maximal AE also leads to maximal value:cost ratios since both indicators are linearly related for specific input and output prices.In terms of response to management, two general classes of soils are distinguished: (1) soils that show acceptable responses to fertilizer, or \"responsive soils\" (Path A, Figure 6-4) and ( 2) soils that show little or no response to fertilizer due to other constraints besides the nutrients contained in the fertilizer, or \"less-responsive soils\" (Path B, Figure 6-4). In some cases, where land is newly cleared or where fields are close to homesteads and receive large amounts of organic inputs each year, a third class of soil exists where crops respond little to fertilizer as the soils are fertile. The ISFM definition proposes that application of fertilizer to improved germplasm on responsive soils will boost crop yield and improve AE relative to current farmer practice, which is characterized by traditional varieties receiving too little and poorly managed nutrient inputs (Path A, Figure 6-4). Major requirements for achieving production gains on responsive fields within Path A (Figure 6-4) include the use of diseaseresistant and improved germplasm; crop and water management practices; and application of the \"4R\" Nutrient Stewardship Framework-a science-based framework that focuses on applying the right fertilizer source, at the right rate, at the right time during the growing season, and in the right place (IFA, 2009).Organic inputs contain nutrients that are released at a rate determined in part by their chemical characteristics or organic resource quality. However, organic inputs applied at realistic levels seldom release sufficient nutrients for acceptable crop yield. Combining organic and mineral inputs has been advocated for smallholder farming in the tropics because neither input is usually available in sufficient quantities to maximize yields and because both are needed in the long term to sustain soil fertility and crop production. An important question arises within the context of ISFM: Can organic resources be used to rehabilitate less-responsive soils and make these responsive to fertilizer (Path C in Figure 6-4)? In Zimbabwe, applying farmyard manure to sandy soils at relatively high rates for 3 years resulted in a clear response to fertilizer where there was no such response before rehabilitation (Zingore et al., 2007). In southwestern Nigeria, integration of residues from Siamese senna (Senna siamea), a leguminous tree, reduced topsoil acidification resulting from repeated application of urea fertilizer (Vanlauwe et al., 2005).As previously stated, soil fertility status can vary considerably within short distances with substantial impacts on fertilizer use efficiency.Three broad classes of fields can be distinguished that occur across a range of agroecologies:(1) fertile, less-responsive fields, (2) responsive fields in which a strong response to fertilizers is found, and (3) poor, less-responsive fields. Figure 6-4 illustrates examples 2 and 3, above. In addition to fertilizer and organic input management, other measures for adaptation to local conditions include application of lime on acid soils, water harvesting techniques on soils susceptible to crusting under semi-arid conditions, or soil erosion control on hillsides. Lastly, adaptation also includes considering the farming resources available to a specific farming household, often referred to as farmer resource endowment. The status is related to a specific set of farm typologies. In other words, ISFM options available to a specific household will depend on the resource endowment of that household. CIAT equates eco-efficient agriculture to more productive, profitable, competitive, sustainable, resilient, and equitable agriculture. Although this definition is primarily quantitative, it also allows qualitative assessment of the ISFM paradigm relative to current agricultural practices.ISFM aims at eco-efficiency in various ways. The definition of ISFM itself embeds the concept of eco-efficiency through its focus on maximizing the agronomic efficiency of inputs, with enhanced productivity and profitability and minimized losses to the environment as direct consequences. Intensifying agricultural production can also reduce the pressure to open up new land that is often poorly suited to crop production but valuable in the context of other ecosystem functions. The concept of local adaptation embedded in the definition requires consideration of not only soil fertility gradients but also resource endowment of farming families, thus promoting increased equity among households.The rehabilitation of less-responsive sites is a special case, as immediate returns to investment are not expected to be high. Implementing ISFM options restores productivity through a gradual increase in soil fertility resulting from moreeffective use of improved germplasm, fertilizers, organic inputs (crop residues, farmyard manure), or even biofertilizers. Rehabilitating such soils enhances eco-efficiency at the farm level since more of the land area will be using agricultural inputs more efficiently.A main issue related to sustainability is whether applying fertilizer can generate the required crop residues and other organic inputs that are needed to optimize the AE of fertilizer and sustain the soil-based ecosystem functions and services, governed by the soil organic-matter pool. There are indications that it can. Bationo et al. (1998) found that where fertilizer was applied to millet, sufficient residue was produced to meet both farm household demands for feed and food and the management needs of the soil in terms of organic-matter inputs and protection of the soil from wind erosion.Principles embedded within the definition of ISFM need to be applied within existing farming systems. Based on the main principles underlying ISFM and the specific production environment of the African Great Lakes region, specific entry points have been identified covering the various dimensions of ISFM (Table 6-3). Rehabilitation of non-responsive soils is not included in the table because it is unlikely to be a major short-term entry point towards ISFM. Some of these potential entry points are further developed in the following sections, based on results obtained within the CIALCA mandate areas and following the ISFM stepwise approach.For a significant improvement in eco-efficient crop productivity, an enhanced supply of nutrients has to go hand in hand with a greater demand by the crop. Applying fertilizer to germplasm that is unresponsive, not adapted to the environment, or that is affected by pests and diseases will result in low AE values. In South Kivu, DR Congo, for example, improved, open-pollinated maize varieties yielded more than local varieties without fertilizer but some varieties also had a higher response to fertilizer application, resulting in higher AE values (Figure 6-5). Similarly, replacing mosaic-virus-susceptible cassava varieties with tolerant varieties resulted in a substantial increase in cassava response to fertilizer (unpublished data from authors).Step 2: Organic matter x fertilizer interactions Pypers et al. (in preparation) observed a significant effect of previous cropping on maize yields both with and without fertilizer in field demonstrations in South Kivu, DR Congo (Figure 6-6). Yields of maize following soybean or climbing beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) were 27-57% higher than that of maize following maize. Rotational benefits were also greater when improved, dual-purpose legume varieties with a low harvest index were grown. These legumes gave similar grain yields to local varieties (not shown), but grain yields following maize crops were 20-34% higher than those of maize following local legume varieties. These yield improvements were related to greater biological nitrogen (N) fixation in the improved legumes, which derived a Fertilizer response and the effect of combining inorganic and organic nutrient resources were also evaluated in cassava systems. The most common fertilizer, NPK 17:17:17, was applied with or without green manure made from Tithonia sp. or Chromolaena sp., and effects on storage root yield evaluated in two locations with differing soil fertility status (Figure 6-7) (Pypers et al., 2012). Control yields were similar at the two sites (12 t/ha fresh roots), but response to fertilizer differed between the sites: storage root yields reached 40 t/ha at Kiduma but only 20 t/ha at Mbuela. A much larger response to Tithonia sp. green manure was also observed at Kiduma, which was likely related to the higher quality and nutrient contents of the green manure grown at that site. Combining organic and inorganic nutrient resources did not result in positive interactions. No significant differences in yield were observed comparing sole application of fertilizer or green manure added to the control, relative to yields obtained with combined application of both nutrient sources (Figure 6-8) (Pypers et al., 2012). In maize-based systems, positive interactions between organic and inorganic fertilizers often arise from better synchrony in N release and N uptake by the crop. In cassava systems, where K is more often the most limiting nutrient, such a mechanism is likely to be less relevant. Potassium is mostly retained on the exchange complex, and has little affinity for organic matter.Response to fertilizer also varies according to specific local conditions. For example, bean yields increased between 0 and 1 t/ha (Figure 3A). AE averaged 2 kg of grain per kilogram of diammonium phosphate fertilizer applied, but On sloping land, anti-erosion measures are necessary to conserve the fertile topsoil and sustain long-term crop productivity. Without such measures, soils will degrade and become unproductive. One technique often promoted is progressive terracing using Calliandra calothyrsus hedgerows combined with earth embankments whereby the soil is deposited above a furrow dug along the contour (fanya juu in Kiswahili). However, these measures often have few short-term benefits and reduce the area available for cropping. In addition, hedgerows may compete with the crops, and earth embankments may bring up less fertile subsoil. A trial was conducted in South Kivu to evaluate the trade-offs between crop production and soil conservation in these systems. Yields were highest on plots without any anti-erosion measures (Figure 6-9) (Pypers et al., in preparation). Plots with both fanya juu and Calliandra hedgerows yielded only half as much as the control plots in the first year. In the fourth year, yields in the systems with anti-erosion measures were only 17-33% lower than from the control plots. After 4 years, more than 30 kg of soil had been lost per square meter of the control plots, which implies that about 3 cm of topsoil had eroded away. Fanya juu embankments were more effective in protecting the soil than were Calliandra hedgerows, and the two measures combined resulted in a five-fold reduction in soil loss. While anti-erosion measures are obviously necessary to maintain soil fertility, there are few short-or medium-term benefits for farmers. Application of fertilizer and large quantities of organic matter to the terraces may accelerate soil fertility restoration, but an external incentive and communal action may be required if these measures are to be implemented (Pypers et al., in preparation).The gradual increase in complexity of knowledge as one moves towards complete ISFM (Figure 6-4) has implications on the strategies used to promote widespread dissemination. The operations of each farm are strongly influenced by the wider rural community, policies, supporting institutions, and markets. Not only are farms linked to the off-farm economy through commodity and labor markets, but the rural and urban economies are also strongly interdependent. Farming households are also linked to rural communities and social and information networks, which provide feedback that influences farmer decision-making. Because ISFM is a set of principles and practices to intensify land use, uptake of ISFM is facilitated in areas with greater pressure on land resources.The first step towards ISFM requires fertilizer and improved varieties. An essential condition for their adoption is access to farm inputs, produce markets, and financial resources. To a large extent, adoption is market driven as commodity sales provide incentives and cash to invest in soil fertility management technologies, providing opportunities for community-based savings and credit schemes. Dissemination strategies should include ways to facilitate access to the required inputs, simple information flyers, spread through extension networks, and knowledge on how to avoid less-responsive soils. Such knowledge can be based on farmers' experiences since most local indicators of soil fertility status are linked to the production history of particular fields (Mairura et al., 2008). A good example of where the seeds and fertilizer strategy has made substantial impact is the Malawi fertilizer subsidy program. Malawi became a net food exporter through the widespread deployment of seeds and fertilizer, although the aggregated AE was only 14 kg of grain per kilogram of N applied (Chinsinga, 2007). Such AE is low and application of ISFM could at least double this, with all consequent economic benefits to farmers.As efforts to promote the seed and fertilizer strategy are under way, activities such as farmer field schools or development of site-specific decision guides that enable more-complex issues to be tackled can be initiated to guide farming communities towards complete ISFM. This may require improved management of organic matter and local adaptation of technologies. The latter will obviously require more intense interactions between farmers and extension services and will take a longer time to achieve its goals. Farmer adoption of ISFM may be further accelerated by implementing campaigns that address all of these aspects by offering farmers information, technology demonstrations, product exhibits, financial incentives, and opportunities to develop their skills within their own farms.CIALCA's experience shows that the need for intensive farmer facilitation and training increases rapidly with increasing complexity of knowledge. This demands considerable investment in farmer training and knowledge-support resources. The CIALCA Knowledge Resource Centre was established in the African Great Lakes region to identify and leverage new impact pathways for ISFM technologies. By working closely with extension agents and outreach partners, targeted information tools can be developed to support adoption of practices by farmers in specific settings. A particular challenge is to develop innovative knowledge products that take into account the low rates of adult literacy and formal education prevalent in the region. Rural radio is one tool that offers a wide reach, and is very useful for raising awareness around a particular issue. However, it is less suitable as a training tool, particularly as knowledge complexity increases. It is therefore important to stress the need for integrated, multipronged communications approaches using a mix of tools when attempting to achieve impact of ISFM at a large scale.Policies towards sustainable land use intensification, and the necessary institutions and mechanisms to implement and evaluate these, also facilitate the uptake of ISFM. Policies favoring the importation of fertilizer, its blending and packaging, or smart subsidies are needed to stimulate the supply of fertilizer. Specific policies addressing the rehabilitation of degraded, nonresponsive soils may also be required since investments to achieve this may be too large to be supported by farm families alone. In recent years, several initiatives have been set up in the CIALCA area to facilitate access to fertilizer. In Rwanda, for example, the Crop Intensification Program has invested in training agro-dealers (small-scale agricultural supplies traders), the development of specific fertilizer recommendations for the major crops, and smart subsidy schemes. In DR Congo, the CATALIST (Catalyze Accelerated Agricultural Intensification for Social and Environmental Stability) project successfully lobbied for the removal of import duties on fertilizer and persuaded private-sector partners to invest in fertilizer supply, resulting in 60 t of fertilizer being imported during the February 2011 planting season, a first for eastern DR Congo.A set of enabling conditions can favor the uptake of ISFM. One factor that is expected to catalyze uptake of productivity-enhancing technologies in CIALCA is linkage to defined markets.CIALCA's market intervention seeks to achieve three objectives: (1) improve the economic livelihoods of men and women in rural areas;(2) create sustainable market linkages and relations for actors; and (3) enhance adoption and raise scale of production. CIALCA has intervened in markets by working with farmers' organizations to achieve a marketable production scale. Capacity building on collaborative action, marketing and business planning skills, and management of credit and finances has ensured that farmers are now able to bulk their produce, wait for better prices, and earn higher incomes from their produce. Besides the farmers, training also targets the institutions and organizations that support the farmers' organizations, such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and national research staff, to ensure post-project sustainability. For instance, farmers in South Kivu were able to raise their sales revenues by 50% through strategic storage facilitated by inventory credit schemes (warrantage in French): farmers did not have to sell immediately after harvest but were able to store their produce collectively, awaiting better prices for their products. Through group efforts, farmers were also able to acquire credit for their ISFM-based farming activities and, because they had targeted production to key markets, were able for the first time to borrow funds without collateral. In addition, farmers working in groups have been able to initiate mutual savings schemes that supplement other sources of finance, particularly for investment in new technologies. Farmers' production projections (captured in business plans) are based on the expected application of specific ISFM technologies to achieve projected yields. This creates a direct link between the ISFM technologies and the intended livelihood improvement through incomes expected to be generated.Another factor that may facilitate the dissemination of ISFM involves the promotion of improved nutrition. CIALCA's baseline studies indicate that the primary underlying cause of malnutrition in the mandate areas is poor-quality diets, characterized by high intakes of food staples but low consumption of animal and fish products, fruits, and vegetables. Staple foods (overwhelmingly cassava, maize, and banana in this example) account for 80% of total per capita energy intake. As such, most of the malnourished are those who cannot afford to purchase highly nutritious foods and also lack access to agricultural technologies and knowledge to grow these foods. By incorporating legume-based products into local diets and demonstrating impact of improved dietary intake on nutrition, CIALCA is encouraging communities to adopt ISFM technologies. While dissemination and adoption of complete ISFM is the ultimate goal, substantial improvements in production can be made by promoting the greater use of farm inputs and improved germplasm within market-oriented farm enterprises. To minimize conflict between food security and income generation, an interdisciplinary approach is used to integrate expertise in farming systems analysis and agronomy, human nutrition, and development economics. Strategic partnerships are forged with a wide range of development partners including health-based NGOs, farmers' groups and community-based organizations to facilitate technology dissemination and uptake.The main principles underlying ISFM have been shown to be applicable to maize-and cassavabased cropping systems in the African Great Lakes region. Combinations of different ISFM components have resulted in substantial added benefits through higher resource-use efficiencies. Nonetheless, responses to ISFM interventions were variable, highlighting the need for local adaptation and identification of interventions best suited for a particular production environment and household resource endowment.The seed and fertilizer approach is providing substantial increases in productivity in Central Africa, and initial efforts should be directed towards increasing farmers' access to these inputs and associated information on how best to utilize them (e.g., avoidance of non-responsive soils). As productivity increases, approaches can gradually shift towards more complex interventions, but this will certainly require more intensive interaction with farming communities. Investment in input supply chains and engagement of farming households in output value chains are crucial to large-scale impact. Such investments are best underpinned by activities aimed at strengthening the ability of farmers' associations to work collectively in purchasing inputs and marketing their produce, increasing access to credit, and strengthening the abilities of farmers to manage financial and other resources.Policy has a crucial role to play in delivering ISFM practices by facilitating access to agricultural inputs and credit, establishing an effective extension system, upgrading rural infrastructure (including feeder roads and local storage facilities), empowering women farmers or female-led households, and investing in national agricultural research capacity. Governments also have a role to play in ensuring that development organizations do not spread contradictory messages within farming communities; a number of such organizations are still advocating against the use of fertilizer and strongly promoting organic agriculture, which, based on ISFM research, is less likely to raise productivity following eco-efficient principles.Lastly, monitoring and evaluating the performance of specific interventions under farmer-managed conditions is crucial to better understanding the relevance of these interventions and eventual adaptation of the processes of technology identification and dissemination. This can only be achieved in a meaningful way through investments in capacity building and community participation. The Indo-Gangetic Plains cover some 700,000 km 2 in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan and are home to nearly one billion people. Narang and Virmani (2001) divided the IGP into five subregions, based on physiographic, climatic, and vegetation patterns (Figure 7-1). Subregions 1 and 2 (northwestern IGP) have a semi-arid climate with 400-800 mm annual rainfall. The land is gently sloping or flat. The topography is dotted with saucer-shaped depressions with poor drainage, locally named as chaurs. These create flood-plain lakes or wetlands with 50 to 400 cm water depth during the peak rainy season. They are more abundant in the eastern than in the western part of the IGP. In coastal areas, these depressions form the marshy/ swampy lands. They are used as community fishing ground in the wet season, and for winter (boro) rice, maize and vegetable crops after the water recedes. Soils are alluvial and calcareous with some alkaline soils in pockets. The groundwater is mostly depleted or of marginal quality. Mean farm size is 3.55 ha, mostly irrigated and mechanized (Table 7-1). Some parts are intensively cultivated, with liberal application of chemical inputs, while agriculture in other areas is rainfed with limited use of inputs (Singh et al., 2009). Surface water and groundwater are used for irrigation and many farmers take full advantage of improved technologies to enhance crop yields and profit (Erenstein et al., 2007;Erenstein and Laxmi, 2008;Singh et al., 2009). Wheat and basmati and non-basmati long-grain rice are the main crops in subregion 1, while the main crops in subregion 2 are basmati and long-grain rice, wheat, maize, black gram (Phaseolus mungo L.), green gram or mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek], sunflower, potato, sugarcane, cowpea, and dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata Pers.) grown for green manure in rice-based systems (Gupta et al., 2005). The annual land use intensity (LUI) is relatively low (182%) (Singh et al., 2009).In the central IGP (subregion 3), the climate is hot subhumid, with 650-970 mm of annual rainfall. The topography is mostly saucer-shaped (see description above for subregions 1 and 2). Soils are alluvial with pockets of alkaline soils on the plains and acidic soils on the hills. Major crops cultivated include rice, sugarcane, wheat, maize, soybean, cotton, potato, and pigeon pea in rice-or maize-based systems, with an annual LUI of 191%. Mean farm size is 0.94 ha (Table 7-1), with limited farm mechanization and adoption of resource-conserving technologies (RCTs) (Singh et al., 2009). Eastern IGP (subregions 4 and 5) has a hot subhumid climate with a mild winter (5.4 °C in January) and higher rainfall (1000-1800 mm per year) than other regions. The land is gently sloping with alluvial, calcareous/alkaline, and acidic soils that are poorly drained. Flooding is a serious problem in this area. The rich groundwater resource is contaminated with fluoride and arsenic in some pockets. Half of the irrigated area is supplied with surface water and half using groundwater. Rice is the dominant crop, followed by potato, wheat, maize, sunflower, onion, jute, and lentil in rice-based cropping systems. Cropping intensity is quite high (LUI of 233%) (Singh et al., 2009) and mean farm size is only 0.59 ha (Table 7-1). Farmers are relatively poor, and use power tillers for land preparation and seeding (Singh et al., 2009). Farmers supplement their income with other activities such as working as laborers on other farms or in local industries, services, and businesses (Erenstein, 2009). Migration for off-farm employment is also common in other subregions.Two or more crops are grown each year in most parts of the IGP. Rice followed by wheat (R-W) is the predominant cropping system in the IGP in India and Nepal, while double-cropping with rice (R-R) is the predominant cropping system in the IGP in Bangladesh, and cottonwheat (Cot-W) is predominant in Pakistan (Table 7-2). Maize cultivation has increased in recent times both in terms of area and production in the eastern IGP because winter maize is more productive and profitable and requires less water than winter (boro) rice (Timsina et al., 2011). Cereals may also be alternated with other crops, such as potato, lentil, chickpea, mustard, or sunflower in winter; and jute, fodder maize, rice, mung bean, or cowpea during the spring season.The area under R-W on the IGP trebled and production increased fivefold from 1960 to 2000 (Saharawat et al., 2009). Now, however, the cereal systems in subregions 1-3 are becoming more and more unprofitable and less sustainable due to yield stagnation, a 50% decline in total factor productivity, increasing production costs (high cost of land, labor, and chemical inputs), and declining returns from additional inputs (Ladha et al., 2003;Singh et al., 2009). Despite this, farmers continue to intensify R-W systems and are reluctant to diversify to crops with lower water requirements, mainly because of high subsidies for power, fertilizer, and irrigation water, and well-developed production and marketing systems for rice and wheat in the region (Erenstein, 2009;Saharawat et al., 2009). In the eastern IGP (subregions 4 and 5), rice and wheat are produced in traditional, labor-intensive systems on small (average 0.59 ha) farms. Frequent droughts, flooding in the monsoon season, late rice harvests which delay planting of wheat, and limited use of inputs are common and lead to low productivity and returns (Gupta and Seth, 2007). However, LUI is high (233%) because of year-round cropping (Erenstein, 2009;Singh et al., 2009).The problems of both regions of the IGP can be addressed through adoption of eco-efficient agriculture that enhances and sustains productivity and profitability of the rice-, wheat-, and maize-based systems while minimizing the adverse impact on the environment.It is estimated that demand for food and non-food commodities is likely to increase by 75-100% globally between 2010 and 2050 (Keating et al., 2010;Tilman et al., 2011). The increase in demand in South Asia is expected to be at least as much. As there is little scope for expanding the area under cultivation in South Asia, there is thus an urgent need to further intensify land use and increase productivity of cereal systems to meet the growing demand. Projections indicate that production of rice, wheat, and maize will have to increase by about 1.1%, 1.7%, and 2.9% per year, respectively, over the next four decades to ensure food security in South Asia (O. Erenstein, pers. comm.). National mean yields of all three cereals in South Asia are below global averages (except for maize in Bangladesh) and yield gaps of 50% or more exist in all the three crops (Table 7-3) (Aggarwal et al., 2008;Lobel et al., 2009). Thus, there is a great potential to increase the yields of major cereals in South Asia (Ladha et al., 2009;Timsina et al., 2011).Energy use is generally high in intensive cereal production systems. Of the total energy used for crop production, fertilizer and chemical energy inputs comprise 47% for wheat, 43% for rice (Khan et al., 2009b), and 45% for maize (Kraatz et al., 2008). About 60% of this is due to nitrogen (N) fertilizers alone. In the R-W system in northwest IGP, most of the energy is used for land preparation-wet tillage and puddling for rice and preparatory tillage operations for wheat, pump irrigation, and combine harvesting. Conventional tillage is not only fuel-and cost-inefficient, it also contributes to a larger carbon footprint through increased emission of CO 2 (Grace et al., 2003).The liberal or excessive use of natural resources and external inputs such as N fertilizers and other agrochemicals in the western and central regions of IGP has caused environmental and ecological degradation-soil degradation (salinity and alkalinity, soil erosion), depletion of soil organic matter due to oxidation of soil carbon under conventional tillage, depletion of groundwater in large areas, pollution of surface and groundwater, and leakage of reactive N into the environment (Bijay- Singh et al., 2008).Power subsidy to farms leads to inefficient use of electricity, particularly for pumping water. For example, in 2007, 7.5 billion units of electricity (28% of total power consumed in the state) were used for tube-wells in Punjab alone, in addition to the diesel consumed (Anonymous, 2008).As a result of excessive exploitation of groundwater, the depth to water table has increased steadily in many areas (Hira and Khera, 2000;Hira, 2009;Rodell et al., 2009), for example, by 0.2 m/year between 1973 and 2001 and by 1 m/year between 2000 and 2006 in Punjab (Humphreys et al., 2010). The rates of groundwater depletion were greatest in the northwest Indian IGP: in 2009, groundwater was overexploited in 103 out of 138 administrative blocks in Punjab and 55 out of 108 in Haryana (Humphreys et al., 2010). With the continued decline in water table, power consumption for tube-well irrigation will double by 2023 and the cost to farmers of maintaining pump infrastructure and replacing failed pumps will escalate. Moreover, saline groundwater is intruding into fresh groundwater aquifers (Humphreys et al., 2010). Fluoride and arsenic contamination of groundwater is also a problem Potential yield 5.2(M); 3.8(F) 8.8(M); 6.5(E) 6.6(E); 5.9(F) 6.1(M); 6.6(E) 5.5(M); 6.1(E) 5.4(E); 7. in some areas of the IGP. Fluoride in groundwater above the safe limit of 1.5 mg/liter has been recorded in five districts of Bihar, two districts of Chhattisgarh, four districts of Jharkhand, and seven districts each of Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. Similarly, occurrence of arsenic above the safe limit of 0.01 mg/liter in groundwater from the intermediate aquifer at a depth of 20 to 100 m has been observed in 12 districts of Bihar, five districts of Uttar Pradesh, and one district each of Chhattisgarh and Assam (Anonymous, 2008;Hira, 2009).Agricultural systems in northwest and central IGP also produce large amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs), particularly from flooded rice fields (Pathak et al., 2002;Pathak et al., 2003;Bhatia et al., 2010;Pathak et al., 2011). While emission of methane (CH 4 ) from flooded rice systems can be reduced by adopting different water and crop management strategies (Adhya et al., 2009;Gupta-Vandana et al., 2009), such changes, plus increased N fertilizer use, in intensive cereal systems would be likely to increase production of nitrous oxide (N 2 O), another GHG (Pathak et al., 2007;Wassmann et al., 2009). This trade-off between CH 4 and N 2 O emissions is a major limitation in devising an effective strategy for mitigating GHG emissions from the R-W system (Ladha et al., 2009). Burning of rice residues to clear the land for wheat also releases large amounts of CO 2 into the atmosphere (Ladha et al., 2003). Farm machinery, including the pumps used for irrigation, emitted 283-437 kg CO 2 -C/ha of rice and 33-58 kg CO 2 -C/ha of wheat in a R-W system (Pathak et al., 2011).Clearly, new approaches are needed to develop agricultural production systems that are productive and sustainable, both economically and ecologically. Eco-efficient agriculture offers such an approach.Eco-efficiency is concerned with the efficient and sustainable use of resources in farm production and land management. It can be increased either by altering the management of individual crop and livestock enterprises or by altering the land use system. Conceptually the eco-efficiency seems to be similar to the concepts of ecological intensification (Cassman, 1999;Dobermann et al., 2008) and conservation agriculture (CA) (Hobbs et al., 2008), while encompassing both the ecological and economic dimensions of sustainable agriculture. In addition to the economic aspect, evolving social, institutional, market-, and policy-related pressures will determine the extent of development of ecoefficient agriculture (Keating et al., 2010).At the farm level, eco-efficiency might be represented in terms as diverse as food output per unit labor, the biodiversity benefits provided by retention of natural habitat per unit food production, or the aggregate food output per unit water or fertilizer applied (Keating et al., 2010). Production increases of the last 50 years were achieved at significant cost to the natural resource base (degraded soils and ecosystem impacts, including habitat fragmentation threatening biodiversity) as well as the global environment. Future production increases must come from stabilizing yields in areas where yields are already high and increases in production in areas where yields are currently low, while promoting ecological sustainability. The agricultural revolution over the next 40 years has to be the eco-efficiency revolution, with 50 to 100% increases in the efficiency with which scarce resources of land, water, nutrients, and energy are used. Importantly, this greater output and efficiency has to be achieved while maintaining or restoring land, water, biodiversity, and agroecosystems.Practices that have been shown to increase the productivity and eco-efficiency of agriculture at the farm level include resource-conserving technologies (RCTs) such as laser land leveling and direct seeding (Hobbs and Gupta, 2003;Ladha et al., 2003;Sharma et al., 2005;Gupta and Seth, 2007;Harrington and Hobbs, 2009;Ladha et al., 2009), integrated crop management (ICM) (Nguyen, 2002;Balasubramanian et al., 2005), integrated crop and resource management (Ladha et al., 2009), integrated farming systems (Hesterman and Thorburn, 1994), and integrated soil-crop system management (Chen et al., 2011).These and other components of eco-efficient agriculture are discussed in more detail below.Integrating laser leveling with other best management practices has been shown to increase productivity of R-W systems by 7-19% and reduce water consumption for irrigation by 12-30% in on-station and farmer-participatory trials in India, increasing net returns by US$113-US$300/ha per year (Jat et al., 2009). This has been reflected in a rapid increase in the number of laser units employed in the northwest Indian IGP between 2001 and 2008, from zero to 925 and in the laser-leveled area from zero to 0.2 m ha (Jat et al., 2009;Ladha et al., 2009). The laser-leveled area in Pakistan increased from zero to 0.18 m ha during the same period (Harrington and Hobbs, 2009;M. Ahmed, pers. comm.).Zero-tillage (ZT) wheat has been the most successful technology for reducing resource use in R-W systems, particularly in the Indian IGP. The prevailing ZT technology in the IGP uses a tractor-drawn zero-till seed drill to drill wheat directly into unplowed fields with a single pass of the tractor. The ZT drills are made domestically at a cost of around US$400 (Thakur, 2005). Alternatively, wheat seed can be broadcast on a saturated soil surface before or after the rice harvest (Erenstein and Laxmi, 2008). This is ideal for poor farmers, requiring no land preparation or machinery, but its use is still largely confined to low-lying fields that remain too moist for tractors to enter, particularly in the eastern IGP.ZT as applied to the R-W systems in the IGP has three characteristic features that separate it from related systems elsewhere (Erenstein, 2003). First, ZT is typically applied only to the wheat crop in the double-cropped system, with the subsequent rice crop still intensively tilled. Second, ZT wheat after rice does not necessarily entail an increased reliance on herbicide, as the paddy rice fields are relatively weed free at harvest time. Third, ZT wheat does not necessarily imply the retention of crop residues as mulch. In fact, the prevailing Indian ZT seed drills are relatively poor in trash handling, but this has not been a major issue in view of the limited biomass remaining in R-W systems after the rice crop (Erenstein et al., 2007).Combining precision land leveling, ZT, and drill seeding wheat with leaving crop residues on the soil surface quadrupled farmer income compared with reduced-till or conventional-till wheat, mainly due to higher yields resulting from timely planting and reduced tillage cost (Gupta and Seth, 2007;Jat et al., 2011). Smallholders in the eastern IGP have also increased yields and reduced costs by adopting ZT for broadcast seeding of wheat (Gupta et al., 2003). It is estimated that 20-25% of the wheat area in northwest IGP is now under zero or reduced tillage, with or without crop residues left on the soil surface (Erenstein, 2009).Similarly, direct seeding of rice has the potential to provide several benefits to farmers and the environment over conventional practices of land preparation such as puddling and transplanting. Recently, Kumar and Ladha (2011) reviewed the benefits of direct seeding compared with transplanting into puddled soil, which typically include reduction in irrigation water use (12-35%), labor (0-46%), and cultivation costs (2-32%); higher net economic returns, and reduced methane emissions. However, yields are lower in some cases, especially with dry seeding combined with reduced/zero tillage, as a result of uneven and poor crop stand, poor weed control, higher spikelet sterility, crop lodging, and poor knowledge of water and nutrient management. Most rice varieties are bred and selected for transplantation into puddled land. Risks associated with a shift from puddle transplanting to direct seeding include a shift toward hard-to-control weed flora; development of herbicide resistance in weeds; evolution of weedy rice; increases in soil-borne pathogens and pests such as nematodes; higher emissions of nitrous oxide-a potent GHG; and nutrient disorders, especially N and micronutrients. Grain yields and net income were lower from reduced-till and zero-till direct-seeded or bed-planted rice than from conventional rice, despite significant savings in water use (Ladha et al., 2009;Gathala et al., 2011;Jat et al., 2011). This was because of increased weed infestation. Further research is needed to develop suitable weed control technologies for direct seeded rice systems (Kumar and Ladha, 2011).Thus, direct seeding of rice will be adopted only once an integrated package of technologies has been developed, including improved weed control and cultivars that perform well under these conditions.As already noted, water consumption can be significantly reduced by directly seeding rice into dry soil instead of transplanting into puddled soil (Bhuiyan et al., 1995;Bouman, 2001;Cabangon et al., 2002;Sharma et al., 2002), and by growing rice on raised beds (Borrel et al., 1997). However, yields on raised beds may be reduced by 15% or more compared with traditionally-grown rice (Sharma et al., 2002;Vories et al., 2002;Gathala et al., 2011). Similarly, other water conservation techniques, such as crop-need-based water application, alternate wetting and drying (AWD), aerobic rice culture. Would both increase water use efficiency and irrigated crop area (Cabangon et al., 2002;Bouman et al., 2005;Bhushan et al., 2007;Gathala et al., 2011). For example, AWD irrigation of rice transplanted into puddled soil reduced water use by 25% with little impact on yield (7-year average of 7.8 t/ha compared with 8.1 t/ha) (Gathala et al., 2011). Some of the water conservation technologies have positive impacts on resource use and the environment, such as increased water infiltration leading to groundwater recharge, lower energy use due to less pumping of water, enhanced soil quality, reduced methane emissions, and shortterm carbon sequestration in soil due to retention of crop residues instead of burning (Jat et al., 2011).Farmers in the IGP are being encouraged to grow high-value crops, such as vegetables, fruits, and cut flowers, and to expand production of fodder crops and livestock/dairy farming for both local and export markets. In the central and eastern IGP, farmers following the R-W system leave land fallow for about 60-70 days in the pre-monsoon (pre-kharif) season, after the wheat harvest. Growing short-season pulses, such as mung bean (green gram), black gram; green manure crops, such as Sesbania, vegetables, or other high-value crops during this period would diversify the R-W cropping system, improve soil quality, and increase farmers' income (Gupta and Seth, 2007;Singh et al., 2007).Integrated crop-fish/poultry/duck/livestock systems also would diversify farm income, improve food and nutritional security, enhance land and water productivity, and preserve ecosystems (Ayyappan et al., 2009).Efficient N use is central to eco-efficiency in agriculture (Keating et al., 2010). The term nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) relates only to applied fertilizer N, although crops absorb N from other sources. Four agronomic indices are commonly used to measure NUE in crops and cropping systems: (a) partial factor productivity (PFP N ), expressed as the total grain yield per unit of N applied; (b) agronomic efficiency (AE N ), expressed as the increase in grain yield over that of the zero-N control per unit of N applied; (c) apparent recovery efficiency (RE N ), defined as the percentage of applied N absorbed by the crop in aboveground biomass; and (d) internal or physiological efficiency (PE N ), defined as the increase in grain yield over that of the zero-N control per unit of N acquired by the crop (Novoa and Loomis, 1981;Ladha et al., 2005).Two key factors that influence crop yields and RE N in cereal cropping systems are the spatial and temporal synchronization of applied N with crop demand and use of N-efficient crop cultivars (Tilman, 1998;Balasubramanian et al., 2004;Ladha et al., 2005;Balasubramanian, 2010). For example, application of N in transplanted rice in the IGP (551 farms) based on need indicated by a leaf-color chart (LCC) increased grain yield by 0.24 to 0.75 t/ha and net income by US$41 to US$49/ha (Regmi and Ladha, 2005;Varinderpal-Singh et al., 2007;Ladha et al., 2009). Takebe et al. (2006) demonstrated that applying the correct N dose at full heading stage increased the wheat protein content to more than 120 g/kg.Balanced fertilizer use is also critical. For example, Norse (2003) has shown that application of fertilizer with unbalanced N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O ratios (e.g., 100-36-19 in China, 100-37-12 in India, and 100-35-45 in USA) may diminish plant utilization of applied N and thus reduce NUE. Deficiency of calcium, magnesium, sulfur, and micronutrients reduce plant response to N and hence reduce NUE (Aulakh and Bahl, 2001;Aulakh and Malhi, 2004;Mosier, 2002). Thus, deficiency of nutrients other than N must be corrected to get an optimal response to N (Ladha et al., 2005).Soil organic matter (SOM) is a key component of soil health and acts as a temporary storehouse of nutrients. It is reported that more than 50% of crop N is obtained from SOM in most soils except coarse textured sandy soils (Dourado-Neto et al., 2010). Crops use applied N more efficiently in organic-matter-rich soils than in organic-matterpoor soils.Maintenance of SOM is critical for increasing eco-efficiency in farming, especially in tropical soils. Fertilizer N added to soil plays both a constructive and a destructive role in the maintenance of SOM (Ladha et al., 2011). Application of fertilizer N increases production of biomass, part of which is added to soil to enrich SOM (Sisti et al., 2004). However, fertilizer N also increases mineralization of SOM. Oxidization of SOM is also promoted by conventional tillage, removal of vegetation cover, and exposure of the soil to the sun's radiation (Khan et al., 2007;Powlson et al., 2010).Overall, practices such as ZT, maintenance of permanent groundcover, and crop rotation help increase SOM levels and thus maintain soil health and crop productivity (Ladha et al., 2009;Jat et al., 2011).SOM levels can also be increased by applying organic materials, including crop residues, green manure, and animal manure, and biowaste, such as byproducts from food processing and city/ municipal biowastes (Yadvinder-Singh et al., 2005;Sidhu et al., 2008), as can crop productivity and fertilizer use efficiency (Ladha et al., 2011). However, organic materials such as crop residues and animal manures have competing uses (fodder, fuel, roofing material) and thus their availability for use as a soil amendment is limited (Erenstein, 2009). Also, conventional practices of organic amendment, such as incorporation and composting, are labor intensive. Therefore, in-field cycling of available crop residues is likely to be the most effective and least expensive option for the farmers (Yadvinder- Singh et al., 2011).The ideal approach for eco-efficient agriculture is integrated nutrient management (INM), or optimum use of all available nutrient sources-SOM, BNF, crop residues, manures, and mineral fertilizers. The integrated soil fertility management in Africa (Vanlauwe et al., 2004), site-specific nutrient management in Asia (Dobermann and White, 1999;Dobermann et al., 2004;Buresh, 2010), and integrated plant nutrient systems (Bruinsma, 2003) are some of the efforts to promote the efficient use of various nutrient sources. INM can save 5-30% of fertilizer N and increase grain yield by 10-15% (Vanlauwe et al., 2002;Balasubramanian et al., 2004;Dobermann and Cassman, 2004;Ladha et al., 2005;Bijay-Singh et al., 2008;Buresh, 2010). Stress-tolerant crop varieties, when combined with INM systems and ICM, increase grain yields and NUE even under stressful conditions (Havlin, 2004;Ortiz et al., 2008;Ribaut et al., 2009;Ali-Jauhar and Santlaguel, 2011).Globally, the demand for food and agricultural products is projected to double by 2050 (Keating et al., 2010). Given that only 7 to 12% of the projected increase in food production between 2010 and 2050 is likely to come from expansion of arable land area (Fischer et al., 2005), most of the increase will have to come from intensification of existing production systems -13-15% from increased cropping intensity and 75-76% from increased yields (Fischer et al., 2005(Fischer et al., , 2007)). This can be achieved sustainably only through ecoefficient agriculture. Here we present three examples of eco-efficient agricultural systems operating successfully in the IGP that could be replicated in other similar agroecological zones.Intensive irrigated cereal production systems of the northwest and central IGP combine CA practices with efficient water, nutrient, and pest management. Land management, crop establishment, and crop management practices employed include land leveling, ZT, direct/drill seeding, deep placement of fertilizer N, residue mulch, and diverse crop sequences/rotations. The systems achieve land productivity of 70-90% of site yield potential for major crops; water productivity of 0.8 to 1.0 kg grain/m 3 water for rice and 2.0-2.5 kg grain/m 3 water for maize and wheat; agronomic N use efficiency of 20-25 kg additional grain/kg N applied for rice and wheat and 25-30 kg additional grain/kg N applied for maize; crop N recovery efficiency of significantly more than 50%; reduce farm energy use by 40-50%; reduce methane and N 2 O emission by 40-50%; and increase soil organic matter to 2-3% in most soils except in sandy soils. The systems are thus highly productive and profitable, efficient in resource use and conservation, enhance ecological efficiency and climatic resilience, improve soil quality, preserve biodiversity, and have minimal environmental footprints (Gupta et al., 2003;Gupta and Seth, 2007;Harrington and Hobbs, 2009;Ladha et al., 2009). Such systems currently occupy some 4 million hectares of land in the IGP.Integrated farming systems (IFSs) are a natural resource management strategy advocated by the Central Rice Research Institute (CRRI), Cuttack, India. The objective is to achieve economic and sustainable production of diverse products to meet farm families' needs and to cater to local market demands, while preserving the resource base and maintaining environmental quality (Hesterman and Thorburn, 1994). Generic IFS models developed by CRRI integrate cropping with horticulture, fish, poultry, ducks, pigs, sericulture, mushroom culture, bee-keeping, farm woodlots, depending on agroclimatic and socio-economic conditions (Table 7-4). A micro watershed (15-18% of the farm area) is used to drain excess water from rice fields during floods in deepwater ecosystems, and to provide one or two supplementary irrigations for field crops during periods of drought. All crop residues and other farm wastes, including animal droppings, are recycled or composted and returned to the land. Initial cost of earth works for land shaping ranges between US$2900 and US$3300/ha.IFSs have been shown to stabilize crop production (especially in rainfed ecosystems); enhance resource recycling; ensure efficient use of all inputs; generate year-round employment; improve farm income, cash flow, and family nutrition; and maintain healthy ecosystem services in the face of biotic, abiotic, and environmental stresses and climate-changeinduced extreme weather events in the lowlands (Srivastava et al., 2004;Mangala, 2008). The benefit/cost ratio increased from 1.89 for rice alone to 2.27 for rice plus horticultural crops, 2.80 for rice plus horticultural crops and fish, and to more than 3.00 if ducks were added to the system (Srivastava et al., 2004). The IFS model for rainfed medium lowland has been adopted on 100 ha of land in Orissa State, India, and the model for deepwater areas on 40 ha. These IFSs could be expanded to the eastern IGP, but this would require financial assistance to help with the costs of initial land shaping, training of and technical support to farmers during the first year of adaptation and adoption, and development of market access for the multiple products produced in the IFS.Incorporating grain legumes in the R-W system has the potential to increase farm income, improve soil fertility, and thus enhance the sustainability of the farming system. For example, farmers in Bangladesh planting mung bean, during the short fallow period between winter wheat and monsoon rice, earned more than US$600/ha more than those who left the land fallow (A. Sarkar, pers. comm.). Improved shortduration, salt-tolerant crop varieties (e.g., BARI mung-6 in Bangladesh, hybrid pigeonpea in India) could intensify or diversify crop production in the IGP (Dahiya et al., 2002;Khan et al., 2009a).Intensive eco-efficient farming has an important role to play in addressing existing and emerging problems of intensive cereal production systems in the IGP.In the water-poor northwest IGP, changes envisaged include enhancing eco-efficiency in intensive cereal production systems and replacing rice with crops with lower water requirements. In the rainfall-and groundwater-rich eastern IGP, viable options include integration of irrigated boro rice, maize, and annual crops, such as sugarcane and banana, inclusion of grain or green manure legumes in the R-W cropping system, and intensification of rice-based cropping systems and crop-livestock systems. Generic IFS models have been developed that employ land leveling and micro watershed to grow rice, upland crops, fruit trees, timber trees, produce fish and poultry, and support bee-keeping and sericulture. However, although the system has been shown to stabilize crop production, enhance resource use efficiency and recycling, generate year-round employment, improve income, cash flow and family nutrition, and maintain healthy environment, farmer adoption is still limited.Improving the productivity of farm-scale eco-efficient agriculture to the level achieved on research plots will be a challenge as it requires transfer of complex and knowledge-intensive principles and practices to millions of smallholder farmers. This will require massive concerted efforts in six areas: Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important food legume in tropical Latin America and East and Southern Africa. Beans originated in the mid-altitude neotropics with moderate soil fertility conditions. Typically, they are not well adapted to extreme climatic and edaphic environments. Climate change will alter distribution and intensity of biotic constraints to bean production, and more intense droughts will adversely affect important production regions in Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, and Southern Africa. In the tropics, the crop is cultivated largely by poor farmers, often on soils that are deficient in nitrogen and phosphorus. Both climatic and edaphic constraints cause severe yield losses. They are widespread, often intense, and occur every year in the case of heat and soil problems. Developing the right root system to cope with root rots, drought, and soil problems in each production environment will be a major research challenge. Genetic improvement for resistance to major biotic and abiotic constraints will have significant and wide impact. Fertilizers that improve plant vigor, root growth, and access to soil moisture, or irrigation to counter drought, are seldom viable options for small-scale farmers. While programs to subsidize such inputs merit consideration, crop improvement through plant breeding will probably be the cornerstone of adapting beans to climate-smart production systems in the tropics. The secondary and tertiary gene pools of common bean cover a range of environments from cool moist highlands to hot semi-arid regions, and will be important resources for the genetic improvement of common bean as it must increasingly confront extremes of heat, drought, and excess moisture. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a traditional crop of the neotropics, where it was domesticated several thousand years ago (Freytag and Debouck, 2002;Chacón et al., 2005). In Central America it formed an essential part of the diet as one of the \"three sisters\"-maize, beans, and squash. Its central role in the livelihoods of the original inhabitants of the American continent is illustrated by its frequent representation in artwork. It continues to be an essential part of the diet in tropical America, as well as in East and Southern Africa, where it was introduced about 400 years ago (Greenway, 1945), and many other parts of the world.Many of the issues of adaptation of the modern cultivated bean can be traced to its wild ancestor. Knowledge of this wild ancestor and its native environments can elucidate patterns of adaptation of the cultivated bean and identify some of the challenges that breeders and agronomists face in confronting environmental stress.The wild bean is a vigorous annual liana of 6 to 10 months duration that depends on its vegetative vigor to outcompete surrounding vegetation. It originated in a subhumid premontane forest, typically at mid-altitudes of 1200 to 1800 meters above sea level (masl) and with moderate temperatures (Toro et al., 1990). Soils in this environment typically are organic with reasonable drainage and moderate fertility. Weather patterns are characterized by well-defined wet and dry seasons and abundant total rainfall, but often with a dry period of 2 to 4 weeks or longer in midseason between peaks of bimodal rainfall. Thus, with the possible exception of the dry highlands of Mexico where drought is endemic and occasionally intense, the wild ancestor was not often exposed to extreme environments of soil, temperature, or drought. This fact influences the adaptation range of the species and of cultivated beans, and represents a particular challenge to efforts to adapt the crop to more challenging environments, especially as these evolve under the influence of climate change.The cultivated bean was domesticated in its mid-altitude environment both in the southern Andes and in Mesoamerica, resulting in two contrasting gene pools that have been subdivided into races (Blair et al., 2009). The Mesoamerican gene pool has been subdivided into four genetic groups or races (Beebe et al., 2000), while three races have been defined in the Andean gene pool based on plant morphology and adaptation range (Singh et al., 1991). From these regions, beans were carried into environments with stresses that were different from what they likely confronted in their wild state. The cultivated bean has thus been adapted to wider environments, either by empirical selection by plant domesticators and farmers or through systematic selection by plant breeders (Beebe et al., 2011a).Primitive bean varieties in Mexico, Central America, and the Andes were vigorous climbers and were planted with maize for physical support in altitudes from 1200 to 3000 masl. Semidomesticated types might have been collected from the wild with little or no human intervention during the growth cycle (Beebe et al., 1997b). Subsequently, less aggressive plant habits were selected for cultivation as semi-climbing beans in a relay system with mature maize stalks as support, or between rows of maize, cassava or other crops, or as a sole crop.As beans were moved into still-lower altitudes, they confronted less favorable environments. In Central America and Brazil, they are frequently cultivated between 400 and 1000 masl with much higher temperatures than the wild ancestor experienced. In Brazil, currently the largest single bean producer in the world, bean is grown on the drought-prone sandy soils of the northeast and acid infertile soils of the Cerrados (Thung and Rao, 1999).The crop was probably introduced to Africa by Portuguese traders early in the 17th century, where it met with great success in the Great Lakes region. Highland Africa is now regarded as a secondary center of diversity for the common bean and the crop is an important contributor to food security in the region (Asfaw et al., 2009). In Africa bean has found its niche in a similar mid-altitude environment as it occupies in the Americas, occasionally interplanted with maize or other crops such as cassava, banana, and pigeon pea (Wortmann et al., 1998). Bush bean varieties are adaptable to various cropping systems due to their short growing cycle, while climbing varieties have been cultivated in the highlands of East Africa for many years at elevations of 2000 masl or higher. In the mid-1980s, CIAT introduced Mesoamerican climbing beans with adaptation to altitudes of 1500-1800 masl. Beans have now been pushed into the dry eastern hills of Kenya and northern Tanzania, into environments that represent frontiers of adaptation for the common bean and a challenge for breeders and agronomists to improve adaptability.In modern times in Latin America, it is more common to find beans planted as a sole crop than as an intercrop. Even in the traditional systems with maize in Central America, most farmers prefer to plant varieties with bush growth habits that require less labor to harvest than the traditional association or relay systems where the bean must be untangled from the maize stalk. In Argentina, Brazil, on the Pacific coast of Mexico, and in the USA, beans have become a commercial crop with high inputs and mechanization. Modern varieties have upright plant habit with an eye to direct mechanical harvest. In these commercial systems, bean cultivation responds to market demand and competes with other commercial crops, especially soybean and maize. In Africa, beans are gaining an important place on the export market and are considered an important source of household income.Table 8-1 lists the major production constraints to common bean production, including biotic (fungal, bacterial, and viral diseases; insect pests) and abiotic (drought, heat, nitrogen [N] and phosphorus [P] deficiency; acid soil) stress factors. This topic has been reviewed by Singh (1999), Rao (2001), Miklas et al. (2006), and Beaver and Osorno (2009).Diseases and pests are universal constraints to bean production, especially fungal pathogens (Schwartz and Pastor-Corrales, 1989;Wortmann et al., 1998). Diseases may cause 80-100% yield loss while pest damage, especially during the early seedling stage and pod formation, also causes severe yield losses. Anthracnose, rust, and angular leaf spot are widely distributed, while rhizoctonia web blight and ascochyta blight can be locally intense in warm-moist and cool-moist environments, respectively. In the past few decades, root rots have emerged as a greater problem (Abawi and Pastor-Corrales, 1990), especially those caused by Pythium spp. and Fusarium spp. Intense cultivation under increasing population pressure, without fallow periods or adequate crop rotations, results in declining soil fertility or soil compaction, or both, and in build-up of pathogen inoculum in the soil (Wortmann et al., 1998). Reduced soil quality inhibits root growth and the potential for plant recovery after infection. Fusarium spp. are a major constraint in Mexico (Navarrete-Maya et al., 2002) and Rwanda, and Pythium spp. in the moist highlands of Uganda (CIAT, 2007). Several species of Pythium have been isolated from infected beans in Uganda, some of which also infect sorghum. While rotation with cereals is a widely accepted practice to reduce inocula in the soil, this practice may not be as effective with pathogens that infect both beans and cereals.Common bacterial blight is the most important bacterial disease, while halo blight can occur occasionally in cool climates. Although yield losses of up to 40% have been recorded in managed trials, and common blight can be intense in production systems in Argentina and Brazil, in most small-scale farming systems, losses seldom reach this level. Rather, common blight is more of a threat in seed production, since the pathogen is seed borne and results in rejection of seed lots. Infection of pods will discolor grain, especially of white seeded types, and reduces commercial quality.Viruses can be especially devastating. In lowland Americas gemini viruses are almost universally present (Anderson and Morales, 2005). Bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) is a seedborne potyvirus and is distributed throughout the bean-growing world. Its close relative, bean common mosaic necrotic virus, is prevalent in parts of Africa and appears locally in the Americas.Insects are occasional problems. In Central America the bean pod weevil, Apion godmani and A. aurichalceum, is the most important pest (Schwartz and Pastor-Corrales, 1989), while in East Africa the bean stem maggot (Ophiomyia spp.) is a serious limitation (Wortmann et al., 1998), as are aphids and pod borers. In Mexico the bean beetle causes serious damage. Leafhoppers (spp.) cause serious damage in drier climates.Climate change will undoubtedly alter patterns of disease and insect incidence and intensity. Equatorial regions of the northern Andes and the East African highlands are expected to receive more rainfall on average as a result of climate change, although extreme rainfall events induced by the La Niña phenomenon will be the major problem (Yadav et al., 2011). Excess rainfall will exacerbate existing problems with many of the fungal pathogens, particularly soil-borne pathogens and foliar pathogens such as angular leaf spot and anthracnose (Beebe et al., 2011a). Excess rainfall and medium to high temperature will increase the incidence of web blight and angular leaf spot at elevations between 50 and 1400 masl. On the other hand, disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum and Macrophomina phaseoli can be more severe on drought-stressed crops, and could also become more limiting in Mexico and other countries. Most root-rot pathogens need some soil moisture to support infection. However, once disease has been established in a drought-stressed plant, the damage may be much greater than in plants in a non-drought situation. Macrophomina is a major problem under conditions of terminal drought (Frahm et al., 2004), whereas Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium spp. are major root pathogens in regions where intermittent drought occurs (Navarrete-Maya et al., 2002).Drought conditions will affect disease by making the environment more or less favorable for infection, disease development, and/or disease spread. Although droughts occur when there is a lack of rainfall, humidity may not be lacking and dew is likely to form if the air is humid and night temperatures fall below the dew point. Dew on leaves creates a favorable environment for some pathogens, and damage from some leaf diseases may be extreme in drought-stressed plants. Dew on leaves often provides enough moisture for the rust pathogen (Uromyces appendiculatus) to infect plants. High humidity provides a favorable environment for the infection and development of powdery mildew as well.Pests such as the bean stem maggot, whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci) that transmit bean golden mosaic virus, and aphids that transmit BCMV (Aphis fabae and Aphis craccivora) are very important in drought conditions. High incidence of BCMV is expected at elevations between 50 and 1400 masl and during drought periods and at high temperatures. Rising temperatures will likely broaden the geographic range of Bemisia spp. and will carry the viruses into higher elevations (Beebe et al., 2011a).Soil constraints per se are probably the biggest single cause of a persistent yield gap between potential and realized productivity, particularly in developing countries in the tropics (Wortmann et al., 1998;Thung and Rao, 1999). General symptoms of mineral deficiency or toxicity include poor emergence; slow growth; seedling and adult plant stunting; leaf yellowing, chlorosis, and bronzing; reduced overall growth and dry-matter production; delayed and prolonged flowering and maturity; excessive flower and pod abortion; low harvest index; reduced seed weight; deformed and discolored seeds and severe yield loss (Singh et al., 2003). Root growth may also be adversely affected (Fawole et al., 1982;Cumming et al., 1992).The wild ancestor of the common bean originated in soils that were typically high in organic matter and that were seldom critically deficient in nutrients. The wild bean is more sensitive to low soil P availability than its cultivated counterparts, suggesting that domestication and selection have actually improved adaptation to P-deficient soils (Beebe et al., 1997a). However, adapting bean to nutrient-poor soils continues to be a challenge. P and N are the elements most often limiting in tropical soils. Legumes are especially limited by poor P availability; K is limiting only occasionally. Often fertilizer is not applied to the bean crop, but rather to the companion cereal crop, either in association or rotation, and the bean crop benefits from residual fertility. Micronutrients are constraining in some soils, especially those with alkaline pH. In Iran, for example, iron and manganese can be critically limiting.Low soil fertility is particularly a constraint for bean production in Africa. In Central and Eastern Africa, the major soil fertility-related problems include low N and P availability, low availability of exchangeable bases, and soil acidity (Wortmann et al., 1998). In this area, P is deficient in 65-80% of the cultivated area and N in 60% of the area. Although beans are produced primarily in areas where median soil pH is between 5.0 and 6.0, over 23% of the production in Eastern Africa occurs in areas where soil pH is below or equal to 5.0.Beans can fix modest to good amounts of N if conditions permit (Hardarson et al., 1993), and climbing beans can actually contribute substantial amounts of N to the system. However, low P availability, high temperatures, or root diseases usually do not permit bean to maximize its N fixing potential. Rising temperatures will represent an even greater limitation on N fixation.Apart from nutrient availability, various soil physical constraints also limit yields. Soil degradation is severe in Central America and Haiti, and is advancing in Africa (Ayarza et al., 2007;Sanginga and Woolmer, 2009). Erosion and loss of soil organic matter (SOM) is associated with lower availability of plant nutrients, declining soil structure, and reduced waterholding capacity. The vast Mexican plateau boasts a million hectares of beans and is characterized by soils that are frequently thin and with low SOM. The bean root system does not penetrate compacted soil well and can be severely limited by soil physical structure.Drought affects up to 60% of bean production regions (Beebe et al., 2011b) and is endemic in Mexico, Central America, parts of the Caribbean, Ethiopia, northern Uganda, eastern Kenya, Tanzania, and Southern Africa. Some regions are expected to become progressively drier under climate change, especially Mexico, Central America, and parts of northeast Brazil and Southern Africa (Yadav et al., 2011). However, it will be the extreme climatic events that will be most limiting and the most threatening to food security, especially those associated with El Niño events.As a consequence of their mid-to high-altitude origin, beans are generally sensitive to high temperatures (Porch and Jahn, 2001). Night temperatures in excess of 20 °C can seriously reduce pollen fertility and pollination. However, current analyses suggest that nocturnal temperatures still seldom reach critical levels and that day temperatures may actually be more limiting (Yadav et al., 2011). Regions where bean is currently cultivated at the margins of its temperature adaptation range and that could soon suffer significant losses due to higher temperatures include lowland Central America and central Brazil Eco-efficiency interventions should be considered throughout the value chain, from farm to consumer. However our analysis suggests that the most successful interventions to favor ecoefficient agriculture will occur in the production arena. Host plant resistance (HPR) as a first line of defense against diseases and insects is a primary goal of plant breeders working at CGIAR centers.In the case of beans, HPR combines several eco-efficiency attributes, especially reduction of pesticide abuse. Breeding for disease resistance is well advanced in the case of dry beans. Nonetheless the use of interspecific crosses with P. coccineus and P. dumosus should be broadened, especially in breeding for resistance to soil-borne pathogens for which resistance is incomplete and that may become more severe under population pressure and more intense cultivation. In Latin America, pesticides are readily available to farmers and pesticide abuse is common, especially on high-value crops such as snap beans (Cardona et al., 2001). High demands for very specific quality traits have slowed progress toward genetic resistance to diseases of snap beans. More intense rainfall will necessitate renewed effort to develop cultivars that are resistant to diseases, especially anthracnose, angular leaf spot, and Ascochyta blight.DNA markers have enormous potential to improve the efficiency and precision of conventional plant breeding via marker-assisted selection (Collard and Mackill, 2008). They are increasingly being used in breeding for resistance to a number of important diseases of the common bean. Several markers have been identified that are linked to genes conferring resistance to angular leaf spot, anthracnose, common bacterial blight, BCMV and its necrotic strain, bean common mosaic necrosis virus, pythium, and Fusarium root rots (Miklas et al., 2006). SCAR (sequence characterized amplified regions) markers have been developed for some of these genes, principally for resistance to anthracnose, BCMV, common bacterial blight, angular leaf spot, and Pythium root rot (Miklas et al., 2006).Extensive work has been done on charcoal rot and one major source of resistance, BAT477, has been studied (Mayek-Pérez et al., 2001;Hernández-Delgado et al., 2009). Quantitative resistance conditioned by four quantitative trait loci (QTLs) with relatively minor effects (13-19%) was reported in the Dorado/XAN 176 mapping population (Miklas et al., 1998). Two of the QTLs with larger effects that expressed across environments were located within resistance-gene clusters on linkage groups B4 and B7 (Miklas et al., 2000).Fertilizer use efficiency per se has not received much attention in breeding programs, although attention has been directed toward adaptation to infertile soils. Such adaptation could be based on either efficiency of nutrient uptake (acquisition efficiency) or on efficiency of use per unit of et al., 2004), exudation of organic acids to solubilize soil nutrients (Ramaekers et al., 2010), or greater root length density in superficial soil strata where nutrients are concentrated (Liao et al., 2004;Beebe et al., 2006;St. Clair and Lynch, 2010). Substantial mechanistic work has been carried out in common bean in this regard, although trait-based selection has seldom been implemented in breeding programs.Alternatively, adaptation to infertile soils can be manifested as efficiency in production of grain per unit of nutrient taken up from the soil (nutrient use efficiency). Genotypic variability in this trait has been observed in common bean when grown in low-P soils or aluminum-toxic acid soils (Rao, 2001;Beebe et al., 2009;Table 8-2).Although studied to date in the context of low native fertility of soils, increases in either nutrient acquisition efficiency or nutrient use efficiency would contribute to the increasing efficiency with which added fertilizer inputs are used as well. This would be one of the most important contributions to increasing yield in common bean in an ecoefficient way. In cropping systems where beans benefit from residual fertility following application of fertilizer to a cereal crop, either strategy would make better use of existing inputs and prevent mining the soil in the long run. In tropical soils with high P-fixing capacity, it is important to recover applied P before it is irretrievably fixed by iron and aluminum oxides (Rao et al., 1999). This implies an efficient root system that aggressively accesses soil nutrients. Combined with conservation agriculture, this could have great practical impacts. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF) received ample attention in CIAT's research program in its early years, in genotype selection and especially in the search for efficient rhizobial strains (Graham, 1981;Kipe-Nolt et al., 1993). While Rhizobium etli typically gives better fixation in optimal conditions, R. tropici is more tolerant of heat and acid soil, and R. tropici strain CIAT 866 has been widely employed in inoculation studies (Hardarson et al., 1993;Graham and Vance, 2000). The quantity of N fixed is normally in direct proportion to the length of the crop cycle. Climbing beans have a longer growth cycle than bush beans, and are a good option for improving soil quality and contributing to the associated or subsequent maize crop yields (Pineda et al., 1994;Sanginga and Woolmer, 2009). In contrast, bush beans often present a negative N balance, removing more N from the system than they contribute. However, in optimal conditions of moderate temperature, adequate P supply in the soil, and modest starter N, even bush beans can fix up to 50 kg N/ha (Hardarson et al., 1993). However, such optimal conditions seldom exist, and bush beans therefore seldom contribute significant N to the system. Nitrogen fixation is one of the most sensitive plant processes to environmental stress and is reduced dramatically by P deficiency (Vadez et al., 1999) or drought (Serraj and Sinclair, 1998).That said, significant progress has been made in recent years in improving tolerance to several of the physiological stresses that limit fixation, including drought (Beebe et al., 2008); aluminum (Beebe et al., 2009;Table 8-2); low P (Singh et al., 2003;CIAT, unpublished data), and combined stress factors of drought and low P (Table 8-2). It is therefore timely to revisit the issue of N-fixation capacity of common bean, to determine if alleviating other stresses through genetic improvement has had a beneficial effect on N fixation in suboptimal conditions. This could also be an opportunity for studies on gene expression. The very high sensitivity of SNF to environmental factors suggests that the plant is actively shutting down its N fixation in the face of other limiting factors. Understanding this plant reaction could lead to selection criteria to recognize genes that are less prone to react negatively to external factors and to maintain fixation activity.Agronomic management is clearly necessary to improve bean yields, and conservation agriculture offers important opportunities for increasing production of common beans. Beans respond well to improvement in soil structure with enhanced SOM. The root system of beans is less aggressive than that of cowpea, for instance, and heavy soils or soil compaction can be serious impediments of its root system. Conservation agriculture improves soil structure, water penetration, root development, and plant nutrition and therefore deserves more attention in a systems context, such as in the maize-bean system in Central America (Castro et al., 2009) or the mixed maize system in East Africa where bean is a common component (Hyman et al., 2008). For example, crop water productivity (kilograms of grain produced per cubic meter of water used) of common bean was higher in a slash-and-mulch agroforestry system than in the traditional slashand-burn agricultural system (Castro et al., 2009).The most energy-demanding process in the whole market chain is probably cooking. Even in the USA, where agriculture is almost entirely mechanized and production consumes large amounts of energy, 48% of energy in the food chain is spent in industrial processing and home cooking, compared with 21% used in production and 13% in transportation (CSS/UoM, 2011). Cooking common bean has a particularly high energy requirement because of its relatively long cooking time. Short cooking time regularly emerges as a consumer-preferred trait in studies in the developing world. There is ample variability in cooking time among bean lines, and exploiting this variability systematically would be both a contribution to energy efficiency and a welcome improvement among bean consumers.In recent years, there has been a move toward consumption of locally produced foods. While this movement is based on multiple motivations, an important one is to reduce the carbon footprint along the food chain. For common bean, this could imply increasing production close to important urban centers that absorb large quantities of beans moved over long distances, including Mexico City, Sao Paulo, Kinshasa, Nairobi, and Johannesburg. The southern region of Mexico, although a traditional bean-producing area, is not self-sufficient in beans and imports beans from other parts of Mexico and from abroad. Local production would seem to be an attractive option, but further studies are needed to determine the competitiveness of different production regions and the yield levels needed on a local level to compete with beans carried over long distances.We have referred to the likely effects of climate change, including changes to the distribution and intensity of biotic constraints; exacerbating effects of drought; and reducing yields due to higher temperatures in low-lying areas of Central America, Brazil, and Africa.While soil conditions are similar year after year and temperatures vary within certain limits for a given site and time of year, drought, pests, and diseases are sporadic problems that make predictions of expected yields difficult. Investments that could raise yields, e.g., fertilizer, labor, or capital improvements, are unattractive in the face of such sporadic risks. Thus, while reducing risk may not affect average yields dramatically, it is a primary step toward other improvements in a system. Resilience of a system is reflected in its ability to adapt to and recover from adverse conditions. Soil quality is an important determinant of the resilience of a farming system. Soil quality, and especially enhanced SOM, permits better root development, increasing accessibility of moisture, soil water-holding capacity, and availability of nutrients. Greater access to moisture will in turn permit the crop to transpire more, which cools the canopy and allows the key processes of leaf expansion and grain development to continue in the face of high air temperatures. While these effects would benefit all crops, beans would benefit in particular given their sensitivity to shortages of water and nutrients. Such systembased interventions are typically adopted more slowly than simpler interventions such as improved seeds or fertilizer, given their complexity and the fact that they often require capital investment. System interventions that benefit multiple crops will likely have a better chance of adoption by farmers than those that benefit only a single crop.While common beans are relatively more sensitive to abiotic stress than other legumes such as cowpea, considerable progress has been made in breeding for tolerance to various abiotic stresses. For example, drought tolerance has been improved through intraspecific crosses, employing the naturally occurring variability within P. vulgaris (Beebe et al., 2008). However, interspecific crosses with sister species of the genus Phaseolus offer prospects of further progress. The genus Phaseolus originates in a remarkably wide range of ecologies, from tropical rainforest to arid desert (Freytag and Debouck, 2002), and species that are cross compatible with common bean cover most of this range. The secondary gene pool, including cultigens P. coccineus (runner bean) and P. dumosus (year-long bean) and wild species P. costaricensis and P. albescens, is readily crossed with common bean. The secondary gene pool is adapted to cool, moist environments and is a source of traits for environments that will likely receive excess moisture. At the other extreme, P. acutifolius (tepary bean) and its wild relative P. parvifolius evolved in semi-arid or arid environments and are a source of traits for hot, dry climates.Drought tolerance has been the object of bean genetic improvement for at least 3 decades in CIAT and other institutions. Early work suggested that deep rooting was a critical tolerance mechanism (Sponchiado et al., 1989). Singh (1995) found superior drought tolerance in crosses that combined the genetic diversity found in the Mesoamerica and Durango bean races. This formula has continued to produce materials that perform well under drought stress.Enhanced remobilization of photosynthate to grain under drought stress is another important mechanism of drought tolerance (Beebe et al., 2011b). The wild bean appears to suppress reproductive development in the face of stress (Beebe et al., 2011b). In the wild, this strategy is effective under a bimodal rainfall pattern, where late rains permit resumption of reproductive development. However, in a short-season cultivar, this strategy results in poor yields. Improved yield under stress is associated with maintaining reproductive development and photosynthate transport to seed. This trait also appears to be beneficial under favorable conditions and to a certain extent in conditions of low soil-P availability (Beebe et al., 2008).Continued progress in breeding for drought tolerance will likely require accessing genetic variability in sister species of common bean. For example, tepary bean is reported to possess multiple drought-resistance traits, including dehydration avoidance (Mohammed et al., 2002). It has fine roots with high specific root length (Butare et al., 2011) and it expresses rapid root penetration to access moisture at deeper soil levels. Although crosses with common bean normally require embryo culture to obtain viable plants, intensive intercrossing has led to enhanced genetic exchange (Mejía-Jiménez et al., 1994), and a stock of introgression lines exists in CIAT (Muñoz et al., 2004) that can be mined for useful traits.Although runner bean would seemingly not be a promising source of traits for drought tolerance, given its origins in moist environments, in fact it displays a unique root system with traits that could be valuable in some circumstances. For example, it is highly tolerant of toxic levels of soil aluminum and has a coarse root system that might be able to penetrate compacted soil more readily than that of common bean (Butare et al., 2011).Our experience suggests that poor soil fertility is a serious constraint on the expression of drought tolerance. A crop that is poorly nourished will have a limited root system and will not have the vigor to resist additional stress from drought. Addressing soil fertility is a critical component of any strategy to combat drought.Climate change will result in some bean-growing regions receiving more precipitation than at present. Waterlogging and associated root rots may increase in East-Central Africa and the northern Andes. Restricting the amount of oxygen roots receive inhibits both symbiotic N 2 fixation and N uptake, reducing root growth and nodulation. Tolerant genotypes may have various adaptive responses (Colmer and Voesenek, 2009). More adventitious roots and/or larger aerenchyma in roots, nodules, and the base of the stem may enhance tolerance of waterlogging. Rapid, reliable screening methods are needed to evaluate waterlogging tolerance.Beans are grown over a wide range of latitudes with mean ambient temperatures ranging from 14 to 35 °C. Temperatures of more than 30 °C during the day or more than 20 °C at night result in yield reduction. High night temperatures at flowering (and to a lesser degree, high day temperatures) cause flower and pod abortion, reduced pollen viability, impaired pollen-tube formation in the styles, and reduced seed size. Acclimation to occasional high night temperatures may be a genotypic resistance mechanism. A pollen-based method developed to evaluate heat tolerance in soybeans might be used to screen common-bean genotypes for tolerance to nocturnal heat stress (Salem et al., 2007).To date there has been limited activity to identify tolerance to heat stress in common bean. Work has been carried out in controlled conditions at Cornell University (Rainey and Griffiths, 2003) but this has not been extended systematically to dry beans in the tropics. There is active interest in improving heat tolerance in Central America (Porch et al., 2007). Evaluation under high temperatures of advanced breeding lines developed for bean golden yellow mosaic virus resistance has been carried out in Central America, and the variety CENTA Pipil developed by the Pan-American Agricultural School of Zamorano, Honduras, has proven to be relatively tolerant in El Salvador. While incremental quantitative progress may be made with further efforts, tepary bean may be a promising source of heat tolerance in the long run. Some interspecific lines of tepary and common bean have been evaluated in Central America and in Puerto Rico, and while some appear to be promising, it remains to be seen if they represent an advantage over available genetic diversity within common bean germplasm. Nonetheless, mining the diversity of tepary bean would seem to be high priority for the future.Bean diseases will be exacerbated in some regions as a result of climate change. Efforts to breed for resistance may need to resort to sister species for broader genetic variability. Runner bean has long been employed as a source of resistance for such difficult diseases as white mold caused by Sclerotinia spp. (Abawi et al., 1978) and Fusarium root rot caused by Fusarium solani (Wallace and Wilkinson, 1965). More recently progeny of crosses between runner bean and common bean have proven to be resistant to both Fusarium spp. and Pythium spp. (CIAT, unpublished data). While using runner bean or year-long bean as a source of resistance is not novel, the utility of interspecific progenies has always been limited by their poor agronomic quality and low harvest index. A recent study suggests that the quality of crosses with the secondary gene pool can be improved by using common bean with enhanced remobilization of photosynthate to grain (Klaedtke et al., 2012). Such parents can \"tame\" the excessive vegetative growth of these sister species and result in superior progenies.While specific agronomic interventions can be made to address the impacts of climate change, broader-based solutions may involve transformation of the whole cropping system. For example, high daytime temperatures might be addressed by adopting a cropping system that provides partial shade to the bean crop. Some such cropping systems already exist; for example, the bean-banana system of Uganda and northwest Tanzania (Wortmann et al., 1998). Beans could be intercropped with coffee to provide shade after pruning of the coffee and while the coffee plantation returns to production. Alley cropping, especially with profitable tree crops such as mangos or other fruits, offers some promise. Such a system could be better exploited if shading tolerance were enhanced in the bean crop.One option that has emerged in past years and that is likely to expand in response to higher temperatures is the use of alternative planting dates. In Central America bean production has expanded dramatically on the Atlantic coast of the isthmus, in the cool, dry, winter season when the crop survives on residual moisture. In Brazil, the cool dry season has seen the expansion of highinput production under center-pivot irrigation. Given that such changes have been largely the result of pressure on land resources or to produce when beans are normally scarce and prices are high, the attraction of producing in a season with more-favorable temperatures will only enhance this tendency.A modeling exercise was carried out to estimate the distribution and relative importance of climatic constraints to bean yields, and the potential value of genetic improvement (Beebe et al., 2011a;Figures 8-1 and 8-2). Breeding drought tolerance into bean could improve suitability of some 3.9 million hectares of land where bean is currently grown (the equivalent of 31% more land classified as highly suitable) and would allow the crop to be grown on another 6.7 million hectares currently not suitable. Heat tolerance could increase the suitability of 7.2 million hectares of land where bean is currently grown. Drought tolerance would also improve productivity on some of this land and could increase the area designated as highly suitable by some 54%. Thus, both drought tolerance and heat tolerance are important objectives for genetic improvement. Although heat tolerance may offer wider impact, drought causes great year-to-year yield variability and must also be given priority.In rainfed agriculture, water use efficiency will be a useful parameter to identify eco-efficient bean genotypes (Table 8- 3). In trials at the CIAT-Palmira (Colombia) testing site, several breeding lines were identified to be superior to the checks.Phosphorus use efficiency will be a useful parameter to identify bean genotypes for use on P-deficient soils or those suffering from aluminum toxicity (Table 8-2). Some breeding lines performed better than the check lines under combined stress conditions of drought and low P and under aluminum toxicity (Table 8-2).On small-scale farms with minimal use of fossil fuel, energy input is in the form of work done by humans and animals-calculation of which would be irrelevant for the world's energy balance but highly meaningful to the farmer. Similarly, reduced cooking time would make a miniscule contribution to reducing CO 2 emissions but would be highly significant for the people who must search for firewood, usually women and children. Reducing the amount of energy expended in transport by promoting local production could be measured by cost differentials between local and imported products. Such a differential would in fact reflect multiple factors but transport cost per ton can readily be obtained. Translating this cost into carbon emissions would require an added level of assumptions.Impact from seed-based solutions would follow from the models of seed dissemination that have been used for standard agronomically improved materials. Recent years have seen a diversity of models emerging, from formal revolving seed models, to decentralized seed production, to small packets of seed and fertilizer and seed loans. Nonetheless, no novel system will alter the fact that long-term adoption will depend on the farmer appreciating added value in the new materials. In the case of germplasm that is resistant to the effects of climate change, farmers will likely be able to see the value of drought tolerance or disease resistance within 2 or 3 years where these stresses are endemic. Tolerance to high temperatures may be more difficult to appreciate, as its effects will be felt more gradually.Agronomic solutions are typically more difficult to deploy. Participatory research should be practiced from the outset, given the complexity of incorporating what are often system-level interventions.Soil-management practices cut across the entire farming system and go far beyond individual crops (Sanginga and Woolmer, 2009). The contribution of a particular crop could be in generating synergistic benefits that make the system more attractive for adoption. For example, climbing beans are far more productive than bush beans, and anecdotal reports suggest that agroforestry was more readily adopted where it served as a source of staking material for climbing beans. Similarly, planting beans among trees during the establishment phase of plantations was reported to have made planting of trees more attractive to farmers by creating a source of income in the short term, and to have aided tree establishment by encouraging weed control. These cases have not been documented, but such potential interactions should be sought.Experience in breeding for drought tolerance suggests that stress tolerance does not necessarily imply a yield penalty (Beebe et al., 2008(Beebe et al., , 2009)). However, the greater the degree of stress that we encounter, the greater will be the demands on obtaining adequate levels of tolerance. Once again, dealing with average conditions will not be nearly so challenging as dealing with extreme events of drought, excess rainfall, and high temperature. Breeders would benefit from more-precise estimations of the frequency and intensity of these extreme events.The genus Phaseolus spans a wide range of stressful environments, offering the prospect of finding the necessary genes for stress tolerance. Tolerance to heat and drought can be found in the tertiary gene pool, for example, and tolerance to excess rainfall can be found in the secondary gene pool. Interspecific crosses, by their very nature, require long-term effort, with the need to overcome negative genetic linkages and/or poor chromosome pairing and slow introgression. These are obstacles that are best overcome with time and patience rather than a frenetic investment of research funds on a 3-year project time scale. Thus, such crossing should receive more systematic attention as of now, albeit at a modest level.If at some time gene expression can be manipulated, then studies of other Phaseolus species might reveal which genes will confer tolerance, and these can become targets for enhanced expression or for gene cloning and eventual transgenesis. Efficient transformation remains a challenge in common bean, and the development of an efficient and effective system is yet another area of research.Little is yet understood about what might be the effects of higher CO 2 concentrations in the atmosphere. Crop experiments conducted in different parts of the world suggested that a doubling of CO 2 from current levels will lead to approximately a one-third increase in grain yield of C 3 crops such as common bean. However, more recent field studies on CO 2 enrichment indicated that this may be an overestimate (Long et al., 2006;Ainsworth and Ort, 2010) and a more realistic estimate is about half of that, i.e., a one-sixth increase. One study on common bean suggests that different genotypes will react differently to higher CO 2 , with seed yield at high CO 2 levels ranging from 0.89 to 1.39 times that at ambient CO 2 (Bunce, 2008). There may be opportunities to exploit this dimension of climate change to the benefit of the crop and possibly the system. However, research is lacking in the tropics to determine the impact of higher CO 2 in cropping systems that are limited by other factors. For example, does CO 2 have a positive effect when the crop is simultaneously limited by low soil P availability and/or drought and high temperature? In this respect and others, agricultural research in the tropics must be more integrative (Thung and Rao, 1999;Keating et al., 2010;Chen et al., 2011) and less reductionist so that farmers as end users can benefit from research to improve their livelihoods.productive with low inputs, or even with crop and soil mismanagement. It is for this reason that cassava is sometimes cultivated on sloped lands without due protection against erosion, or on soils with declining fertility status and organic matter. The solutions lie in a combination of new ecoefficient technologies, education, policy, and improved market conditions so that farmers have fact-based advice and can afford to apply the appropriate inputs. Breeders, agronomists, and plant protection specialists should focus on technologies that support farmer income and food security through efficient use of inputs, natural resource management, and optimizing the genetic variability in genebanks to develop eco-efficient varieties.In early 2012, a press release picked up by several major media outlets announced that cassava is the \"Rambo of the crop world\" for its ability to stand up against the projected heat and drought stresses that will affect large areas of the tropics in the coming decades. The story was based on a special issue on cassava in the journal Tropical Plant Biology [vol. 5 (1)]. This is hardly news to anyone who grows cassava or has been involved in its research for any period of time, but it was an important wake-up call for policy makers, research and development (R&D) agencies and donorslooking for opportunities to make agriculture more \"climate change ready.\" Most people in the developed world have never heard of cassava, in spite of its status as the fourth crop in importance in the tropics, just behind rice, maize, and wheat.In sub-Saharan Africa, it is second behind maize as a food security crop.The impending effects of climate change on crops are steadily gaining urgency for scientists and policy-makers. But climate change is only one of many forces that play out in the daily challenges that cassava farmers face. Ecoefficient cassava-based systems can contribute to multiple development goals aimed at some of the world's most vulnerable people living in hotspot environments.The people who rely on cassava to provide a significant part of their income or nutritional needs are typically among the world's poorest (Table 9-1). They are often farmers who earn their living cultivating degraded and marginal lands, or urban poor who subsist on the lowest-cost sources of calories. At the same time, rapidly expanding new markets for cassava products -especially in Asia, but increasingly in Africa and the Americas -are providing unprecedented opportunities for farmers to improve their income and well-being, and to better supply the needs of multiple markets. These changes are creating both opportunities and challenges across an array of system components. This chapter explores the key roles that research on eco-efficient production, processing, and marketing can play in improving farmers' and consumers' livesthrough income generation, improved food security, better nutrition, and a healthier environment.By far the most important product of the cassava plant is the starchy roots. They may be peeled, boiled, and eaten directly, or may be processed into a wide array of products for food, feed, and industry. The roots are typically about 85% starch, on a dry-matter basis (Sánchez et al., 2009). Their principal nutritional value is calories. Leaves are consumed in some countries, especially in Africa, and they are very nutrient dense, especially in protein.A range of evolutionary, agronomic, and commercial factors define where cassava is grown, how it is grown, how it is used, and the challenges growers face. The crop originated in the Americas, and was widely distributed throughout the tropics and subtropics of the western hemisphere before the arrival of Europeans in the 15 th century (Allem, 1990;2002;Allem et al., 2001;Olsen and Schaal, 2001;Nassar and Ortiz, 2008). Traders carried it to Africa relatively quickly after Columbus. While the introduction to Asia is not well documented, it appears that Spanish traders introduced the species from Mexico to the Philippines in the 19 th century, and independently from Africa to India.While about 100 countries grow cassava (FAOSTAT, 2012), production is skewed toward a relatively few major ones (Figure 9-1). Four countries harvest almost half of global output of fresh roots: Brazil, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Thailand; and three-quarters of production come from just ten countries. Over half the production area is in Africa, but only one of the top four producers is located there. The remainder of production consists of about 30% from Asia and 16% from the Americas.The species is uniquely tropical. Its long growing cycle of about eight months to a few years (average is about a year) and high susceptibility to frost limit its production to warm climates. In the subtropics, especially in southern Brazil, farmers often cut back the stems at the onset of winter, and the crop continues growth again in the spring, allowing harvest at about 18 months.Cassava roots can be \"stored\" in the ground for many months as part of an intact growing plant; there is no well-defined maturity period, although root quality may vary over time due to plant age and environmental factors. However, after harvest, roots begin to deteriorate quickly, often from a day to a few days (Beeching et al., 1993;Reilly et al., 2007). Over millennia, this rapid post-harvest deterioration stimulated the invention of many types of treatments and processing techniques to convert the roots into less perishable products. The main primary processes involve one or more of the following: Grating or grinding and drying to produce flour; slicing or chipping and drying; and starch extraction. Variations include fermentation before or after grinding; forms of compressing to remove water; sun or artificial drying; and toasting or baking. Secondary processes include the production of a wide array of pellet-, flour-, and starch-based products for food, feed, and industry (Cock, 1985). The primary processes not only convert a perishable product into one that can be easily stored, but also they greatly reduce the poisonous component contained at lower or higher levels in all cassava varieties -cyanogenic glucosides that enzymatically break down to release HCN when cell structure is compromised (Du et al., 1995;McMahon et al., 1995;Wheatley and Chuzel, 1993;Andersen et al., 2000;Mkumbira et al., 2003). Roots that are boiled and eaten without additional processing need to be from types with low cyanogenic potential.While every cassava-producing continent encompasses a wide array of production systems and uses for this crop, some broad generalizations apply. These system characteristics impact the design of eco-efficient research strategies. In Africa, cassava is mostly grown on small farms (often less than one hectare) and intended for human food. Areas where fresh consumption is common include Ghana and Uganda. The leaves are an important source of protein, vitamins, and several minor nutrients, most notably in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo). Production in Asia is also mainly by smallholders, with a few exceptions such as some large plantations for starch production in Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), and others. Uses are highly diversified within and across countries. India, Indonesia, and the Philippines produce mainly food products. China, Thailand, and Vietnam produce mainly animal feed and industrial starch; and China is also moving aggressively into biofuels from cassava. In the Americas, Brazil is by far the largest producer. Production systems range from the large plantations (up to a few thousand hectares) in the south to the small landholdings for local markets in most of the rest of the country. In most other countries of the Americas, production is on small farms. In all continents, the vibrant market situation of recent years is attracting new, large investors. Often there is inadequate planning for the management implications of scaling up quickly in large plantations, and many of them have experienced early difficulties in production (Table 9There are several reasons why cassava tends to be a crop of the poor, and these have strong implications for the kinds of eco-efficient research interventions that can lead to positive changes, from both socio-economic and environmental perspectives.• The crop is better adapted than many others to the harsh agro-environments where the rural poor tend to be concentrated, e.g., where rainfall is uncertain and drought stress is common; on soils with multiple production constraints, such as high acidity/high Al content and low native fertility; and on sloped lands where soils are prone to erosion and mechanization is difficult. • It is a crop that will in many cases produce reasonable yields with few or no purchased inputs, such as fertilizers, pesticides, or irrigation. Its vegetative multiplication means that farmers do not need to purchase seeds. The planting material is usually produced on-farm or shared among farmers. There are few commercial initiatives to produce planting material. • Production practices are difficult to mechanize, although there has been considerable recent progress. Therefore, its cultivation can be a comparative advantage for farmers whose principal input resource is family labor. • In many environments, cassava can produce nearly year-round (no specific maturity period, plus ability to store roots in the ground as part of the growing plant). Thus it has appeal to the poor, who may lack resources to pay for and manage storage facilities, such as might be required for a grain crop. It can be harvested when farmers need it. In Africa, even where cereals are the main crop, cassava plays a key role as a back-up crop when cereal production fails.Although cassava is mostly cultivated under low-input and suboptimal soil and environmental conditions, in fact the crop has a very high production potential when provided optimum conditions. Both hypothetical models and field data show that cassava has a yield potential on the order of 80-90 t/ha per year (El-Sharkawy, 2012;El-Sharkawy et al., 1990). With a global average yield of about 12 t/ha, it is easy to see that there is a large yield gap that needs to be addressed to bring cassava's potential benefits to producers and consumers.It is common to find references in the early literature to cassava's \"rustic nature,\" or its ability to produce a crop under difficult conditions. Historically many scientists considered it a crop with few pest or disease problems, and easy to grow with minimum inputs and little care. At the same time, it has developed a reputation as a crop that, more than most, causes environmental degradation, especially soil nutrient depletion and erosion. While there are elements of truth that underlie all of these assertions, none accurately reflects reality on a broad scale. Growers face a range of biotic and abiotic constraints, which vary by region, cropping system, and season. Research organizations need to pay considerable attention to developing eco-efficient approaches to managing production constraints.More than 200 arthropod pests and pathogens affect cassava (Bellotti, 2002;Bellotti et al., 1999). Most do not reach economic threshold levels of damage; however, they are living organisms with the capacity to move across regions and national boundaries, and to evolve and adapt to new conditions and new hosts. Climate change especially opens new possibilities for distribution and adaptation in new areas where these organisms may not have existed, or they may increase due to more-favorable conditions for their etiology (Ceballos et al., 2011;Herrera-Campo et al., 2011).One of the main features of the cassava crop that distinguishes it from the majority of annual crops is its long growing season. Pests and pathogens may complete many generations during the growing cycle. Furthermore, if host material is available in the field throughout the year, these pests and pathogens have no natural break in their cycle to limit their epidemiology. In this sense, cassava is an annual crop that has many of the features of a perennial crop, from the perspective of pest and pathogen dynamics.The historical belief that cassava was not vulnerable to pests and diseases came from a period when most of the crop was cultivated on small and isolated plantations, often in intercropping systems, and before there was extensive international travel that readily carried pests and pathogens among regions.Yield losses from pests and diseases are now understood to be common and widespread (Bellotti, 2002;Bellotti et al., 1999;Calvert and Thresh, 2002;Hillocks and Wydra, 2002). Nonetheless, the estimates of yield losses are generally on an experimental or localized level, and it is difficult to quantify losses on a broad scale. CIAT's Cassava Program attempted to develop realistic yield loss estimates for a broad range of constraints, including pests and diseases (Henry, 1995).In the Americas, where the crop evolved, the pests and pathogens co-evolved and attained their greatest genetic diversity. Additionally, the natural enemies of pests also co-evolved and became a fundamental part of the means for pest suppression. This combination of crop genetic diversity, pest/pathogen diversity, and natural enemy diversity has, for the most part, resulted in a reasonable suppression of the biological constraints in the Americas under traditional cultivation systems. The exploitation of these biological control agents can be one of the most eco-efficient approaches to pest control.In Africa, now with a history of some 500 years of cassava cultivation, there have been both the time and the means to introduce many cassava pests from the Americas. The cassava green mite (Mononychellus tanajoa), cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti), and cassava bacterial blight (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis) are major constraints in Africa, originally introduced inadvertently from the Americas. Others have arisen indigenously either as newly evolved species or through some form of adaptation from other crops to cassava. Cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) are both caused by viruses that appear to have arisen indigenously in Africa. To date they have not been reported in the Americas, but a variant of CMD is present in India and Sri Lanka.In Africa, green mites and mealybugs were quickly able to colonize cassava and spread across national borders. Without the genetic diversity of germplasm having some degree of host plant resistance, and without the presence of the natural enemies that helped suppress the same pests in the Americas, these pests spread virtually uninhibited throughout large areas of the African cassava belt in the 1970s and 1980s. CBSD is now raising similar concerns as it spreads widely within East Africa.In Asia, cassava was able to escape some of the most destructive pests until very recently. Growers in most areas did not have many concerns about pest and disease attacks, except in India (as mentioned above) where a variant of CMD from Africa has been a serious yield constraint since the first half of the 1900s. This is changing. In 2009, Thailand reported the presence of the cassava mealybug, and within a few years it was causing yield losses up to 80% in some fields. In 2010, on a national basis, yield losses were reported at 30%. Cassava is Thailand's second most economically important crop after rice, and the impact on the country was a wake-up call, both internally and for neighboring countries, facing the possibility of movement throughout the region.There are several broad lessons from our experience with biotic constraints in cassava, which inform eco-efficient approaches to their management. We will expand on these strategies in subsequent sections.• Cassava is host to a wide range of mites, insects, bacteria, fungi, phytoplasms, and viruses. While a limited number are currently highly destructive, and usually on a limited regional basis, many others can evolve into economic pests if conditions are right. There is no room for complacency in any cassava growing area. • Pests and pathogens can move globally in spite of existing quarantine regulations and the precautions of the scientific community. Most of the destructive pests and pathogens in Africa and Asia were introduced from the Americas via unauthorized movement of planting material. • Pests and pathogens can move from other crops and evolve into major problems to cassava. They may also evolve to overcome existing resistance mechanisms. Fortunately, there have been few instances of the latter, probably in part as a result of breeding for multi-genic, multi-mechanism resistance. • Experiences with intensified production give clear warning that changes in management can set the stage for pest and disease problems to change -often to become more severe unless integrated pest management strategies are incorporated in the production package. • There is emerging evidence that climate change will broadly affect pest and pathogen dynamics (Ceballos et al., 2011;Herrera-Campo et al., 2011;Jarvis et al., 2012). Rising temperatures and changing rainfall patterns will affect insect/pathogen distribution and development.In many areas, cassava tends to be a second choice for farmers. If growers have better land, or have access to inputs that will improve growing conditions, they will often plant higher-value crops. It is part of the phenomenon that makes cassava a crop of the poor and one that faces a host of abiotic constraints. However, this is changing in some areas of strong market growth for cassava products, especially in Southeast Asia, where cassava prices have risen sharply in the past few years.Soil conditions. Cassava production predominates on acid and less-fertile soils (Howeler, 2011a). It has the well-known ability to tolerate high soil Al concentrations and soil acidity without lime amendments. In fact, where there is economic response to lime, it is often as a result of response to Ca rather than response to soil pH (Howeler, 2011a). This adaptation to soil acidity favors cassava production across large areas of the cassava belt of Africa, in the southern cone of South America, the savannas of Colombia and Venezuela, in Mesoamerica and the Caribbean, and in southern China.Cassava is especially adapted to soils with low P availability. The association with root mycorrhizae allows the plant to very effectively extract P from soils with very low levels. In fact, without the mycorrhizal associations, cassava grows poorly even where P levels are moderately high (Howeler, 2002).Cassava production is also common in sandy soils with low water-holding capacity. In these soils, many crops suffer quickly from short dry periods. Crop failure can result from longer dry periods. Risks in these soils are often not so much related to total annual rainfall as to the likelihood of dry periods during critical phases of crop ontology such as flowering time in cereal or grain-legume crops. Cassava has no critical growth phase after establishment. Also, these soils tend to be leached and have low nutrient status because of the low organic-matter status.Rainfall. Rainfall and soil conditions are highly interrelated in their effects on crop growth and development, as noted above. Cassava is adapted in the tropics and subtropics from some of the driest (e.g., 400 mm annual rainfall) in the Sertao of Northeast Brazil, to some of the wettest agricultural environments (e.g., 4000 mm annual rainfall) in the Pacific coast region of Colombia. Cassava uses several complementary mechanisms to tolerate long dry periods, including deep rooting to access subsoil moisture reserves; stomata that respond quickly to low ambient humidity, thereby reducing transpiration when water is limiting; and the ability to draw on carbohydrate and water reserves in the starchy roots (El-Sharkawy, 2012). Some of these mechanisms come at the expense of optimum yields, but they do allow the plant to survive and produce something where other crops may fail completely.Cassava is intolerant of flooding. Relatively short periods of submersion, of only a few days or less, can destroy a plantation. In heavy soils and in poorly drained soils, cassava often suffers from root rots and generally performs poorly.Certainly not all cassava growers are linked to markets; some are subsistence farmers, who grow only for family use. For these farmers, food security is often the first concern. However, increasingly, cassava farmers grow at least part of their crop for sale. Entry into the marketplace generates income to improve the family's ability to obtain a diversified and healthy diet, as well as broadly improve livelihoods. Access to markets is a critical part of food security for cassava growers. There is now a widespread interest, even for those countries where cassava's role is mainly for food security, to gradually transform it into a cash crop.Value addition of cassava, to bring benefits to growers, is currently a key objective in many countries in Africa, most notably in Nigeria. This transformation should result in poverty alleviation, rural development, and strengthened links between producers and their markets (Nweke et al., 2002).Nonetheless, in much of the cassava-growing world, and especially in Africa, most production is traded locally and is less influenced by global markets. Farmers who are connected to markets may face both the advantages and the disadvantages of a crop whose market prices are not closely linked to global grain markets.Lack of synchronization between production and market demand, especially in emerging markets, often creates wide fluctuations in farm-gate prices. But even in countries with a long-established market tradition in cassava products, such as Thailand, the rapid market diversification is driving changes in the way the crop is grown, processed, and marketed. Where there is greater market diversity, there is greater chance of stable demand and more-stable prices. The mature markets of Asia include animal feed, starch for food and industry, biofuels and processed products for human food. While any one of these markets may experience considerable fluctuation in demand and prices, together they stabilize the prices that farmers receive. Stable markets encourage farmers to adopt new technologies (varieties, use of fertilizers, and soil conservation measures), which result in enhanced productivity and ultimately in more competitive prices, which in turn consolidate the competitiveness of these markets.Typically large farms have advantages over small farms in marketing their products. This is especially a challenge for cassava, since small farms remain the norm around the world even as industrialization of the crop progresses. The move to more intensive, industry-oriented production has not necessarily meant a move toward large farms in the case of cassava. Southern Brazil and Northeast Thailand present two contrasting cases in this regard. Southern Brazil produces cassava mainly for the starch market, based on large farms, often over a thousand hectares. It is an environment where large farms have been the norm for many years, and cassava production and processing have been adapted to this land tenure system. In Thailand and Paraguay, on the other hand, cassava farms remain small, usually a few hectares or less. Large centralized processing plants need to coordinate and aggregate the production from many farmers. Also typical in cassava processing plants is their location near the production areas because of the bulkiness and perishability of the roots. This is an important way for their operations to contribute to rural development. Nonetheless, there are increasingly examples of interest by companies buying or contracting large land areas for industrial use of cassava, e.g., in Cambodia, Colombia, Guyana, Indonesia, and Nigeria. Organizations focused on development-oriented support to cassava research will need to closely monitor the impact of such trends and the implications for target beneficiaries.Increasingly, food security and improved livelihoods will be associated with the ability of farmers to sell their products in the marketplace. The association between capacity to improve income and expansive markets is clear worldwide. Farmers adjust their choice of crops, the way they are grown, and how they are marketed based on access to markets. Few farmers, when given the choice, will remain poor subsistence growers, enduring long hours of backbreaking fieldwork, if there are available markets to sell their products at a profit and make their lives more comfortable and prosperous.Market development for cassava has certainly evolved in most parts of the world, to one degree or another. But in Africa and in much of the Americas, these remain limited local markets, subject to easy saturation and price fluctuations. More robust, broader-scale markets typically need some initial support from public-private partnerships.Market expansion and market development often depend as well on new products, and these new products may need new varietal traits and new processes. The intricate linkage between production, processing, and marketing is not automatic at the outset, especially in most of the situations where new cassava markets are needed, i.e., where farmers are small scale and poor, infrastructure is limited, and credit for development is poor or non-existent. Research for development (R4D) organizations need to bring these initiatives into the context of an integrated and comprehensive project, in partnership with government agencies and the private sector. From the outset, such projects need to have a plan for reduced dependence on public subsidies and greater reliance on the marketplace for sustainable success.An analysis of the potential markets for cassava and its products in each cassavaproducing country is well beyond the scope of this paper. Both Latin America and Africa can learn considerably from the experiences of Asia, but clearly local conditions will dictate different products and different pathways. The free market tends to be a rather effective regulator of supply and demand in mature industries, but until that situation is reached, there normally needs to be some intervention to balance the push and pull factors along the value chain development. Bringing the poorest farmers and small landholders into the equation for successful market development can be especially difficult, but that is precisely what is needed if cassava is to contribute its potential to raising the standard of living of the poor who rely on it.An important lesson can be drawn from Vietnam. Cassava productivity in Vietnam in 1990 was almost the same as the average for Africa. However, as markets expanded there was a sharp surge of productivity that in few years almost doubled the levels of 1990. This is a clear indication of the beneficial effects of strong markets for cassava products. Where there is a market, farmers will seize the opportunity, invest in the crop, and increase their income. Another interesting example is cassava productivity in Thailand during the transition period when exports to the European Union (EU) were gradually phased out and before domestic markets in Asia developed. The upward trend in productivity reversed for few years. Only after the 1990s, yields started to increase and at a very healthy rate.The case of Vietnam offers another lesson. An important bottleneck in the development of markets is that they require cassava to reach a competitive price, which in turn depends on farmers investing and using proper technologies and inputs. There is always a subtle and difficult step to break a vicious cycle: There is no market because there is no cassava at a competitive price, and cassava does not reach the markets at competitive prices because the lack of markets does not encourage farmers to invest in inputs and technologies. Although it is difficult to demonstrate that this was the case, it is tempting to hypothesize that in the case of Vietnam the vicious circle was broken because initially there was on-farm processing. Farmers did not sell their cassava but used it to feed pigs, which was their final product. This on-farm processing (not capital intensive) generated enough motivation for farmers to adopt new technologies that eventually allowed the conditions for the emergence of local processing plants (mostly for starch production or drying yards).Already in the early years of cassava research by international centers CIAT and IITA, it was understood that the Green Revolution approach to improving cassava was not broadly applicable. The high inputs of fertilizer and irrigation, and dwarf architecture that had brought high yields to wheat and rice were not appropriate for cassava in most of the areas where it is grown (Kawano and Cock, 2005). Production and marketing systems, policy, and the nature of the crop were all very different from the cereal grains, and different approaches were required. This was not universally understood or accepted, however, and there was a number of programs that attempted to apply high-input practices to cassava, most of which were unsuccessful. The reasons for lack of success were a combination of socio-economic, agronomic, and genetic factors.Up to recent times, few cassava farmers anywhere in the world had access to purchased inputs to improve production, e.g., fertilizer, irrigation, chemical pest and weed management; or mechanization for land preparation, planting, or harvesting. There were, however, some important exceptions, such as in India, where farmers achieved high yields with moderate fertilizer inputs and irrigation. Because of its long crop cycle, cassava may be exposed to a wide range of pests and diseases over many months, such that successful chemical control of pests often needs to be repeated many times, and thereby is often costly. Because of the crop's drought tolerance, it is often not cost effective to invest in irrigation systems. Even though cassava typically responds to soil fertility improvement, access to fertilizer and credit are typically out of the reach for cassava growers.Current buoyant demand for cassava and its by-products is motivating farmers, industry, and policy-makers to seek solutions to the problems that limit yield and income improvement from cassava production. The following sections review some of the eco-efficient alternatives that farmers and national, international, and private sector programs have developed and implemented.Soil fertility maintenance is a fundamental component of successful crop agriculture. Crops extract nutrients from the soil, and without their replenishment, yields in most soils will decline over time. Low soil fertility may be the single most pervasive constraint to high and sustainable cassava production worldwide. But it is highly amenable to improvements through eco-efficient intervention. Results from many cassava soil fertility trials have demostrated that (1) yields steadily decline without soil amendments, and (2) yields can be stable when appropriate amendments are made. Substantial improvements to crop productivity usually include the application of exogenous nutrients in organic or inorganic form (Howeler, 2011a).There are compelling reasons to work toward soil fertility solutions based on crop nutrient demand and optimized economic response. Fertilizer costs continue to rise worldwide, and their inappropriate application is frequently associated with nutrient runoff into water systems or seepage into groundwater. This creates imbalances in aquatic ecosystems and raises human health hazards from drinking water contamination, and wastes money for producers.In addition to practices that may be more broadly applicable to many crops, there are several innate characteristics of cassava that allow us to design eco-efficient agronomic management approaches. As already mentioned, the root association with mycorrhizae allows a very efficient extraction and uptake of soil phosphorus. The fungus exists naturally in virtually all cassava-growing areas, and usually no special management is required to achieve good root infection for efficient P absorption. In some situations, where cassava is newly introduced into an area where it has not previously been planted, there may be an economic advantage to inoculation (Howeler et al., 1987).There has been limited research on the selection of more efficient biotypes of the fungus, but there are indications that this could be a productive line of research (Howeler et al., 1987). The main constraint to testing and selection of efficient biotypes is the difficulty of managing the inoculant, e.g., artificial production, controlling native populations, and cost-effective inoculation procedures. Because of these difficulties, there has been little commercial use of mycorrhizal inoculations in cassava.Development and application of crop management practices should avoid interference with the effectiveness of native populations. While the effect of agronomic practices on native systems is poorly understood, cassava researchers should be aware of, and test for, any deleterious effects that new inputs could cause. For example, systemic fungicides or herbicides should be especially monitored for their effect on mycorrhizal associations.CIAT has carried out multi-year germplasm screening for efficiency of nutrient use, especially emphasizing potash (K 2 Cl), which is used in relatively large quantities by cassava (reviewed by El-Sharkawy, 2012). There were large differences among genotypes, and probably these could be exploited through breeding. However, establishing selection systems that take into account nutrient use efficiency is an expensive and complicated addition to the many other selection criteria that breeders need to include in their program. As an alternative to a complex system that evaluates nutrient use efficiency by comparing response to low and high nutrient levels, CIAT has routinely selected under low nutrient levels, to allow the more-efficient types to express their favorable traits. This is a research area with potential to benefit from development of molecular markers and the use of marker-assisted selection or genome-wide selection.Cassava is in the field for long periods, and it has no post-establishment critical period of drought vulnerability. This means that drought tolerance becomes very difficult to define. Drought can be comprised of a wide range of variables, e.g., total rainfall during the growing season; length of period(s) with low or zero rainfall; and the growing phase during which drought stress occurs (e.g., early, mid-, late season). While there would be clear advantages to better understanding of the mechanisms involved and the genetic control of tolerance to water deficits, this understanding will require much more research than is possible under natural and variable conditions.CIAT physiologists have extensively studied genetic variation and mechanisms for drought tolerance and water use efficiency in cassava. One of the key approaches has been to compare varietal responses under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions in dry environments. There appears to be wide genetic diversity (reviewed by El-Sharkawy, 2012). Several mechanisms come into play that confer a high degree of drought tolerance to cassava compared to many other species. Water use efficiency is largely the combination of stomatal sensitivity to low atmospheric humidity (stomata close and conserve water when humidity falls), deep-rooting systems, and high photosynthetic activity. Some varieties also appear to tolerate drought by an excessive leaf area index under favorable conditions, which is reduced to ideal levels (about four) under drought stress, thereby maximizing yield.Breeders have capitalized on this genetic variation through various strategies, but mainly by planting breeding nurseries under drought stress conditions. This strategy has some advantages and disadvantages. The advantages include simplicity of management, and the possibility to simultaneously select different mechanisms through exposure to conditions that are representative of where new varieties will actually be grown. Disadvantages include the fact that the specific conditions of drought tend to be highly variable from year to year. This means that in any given year, it may not be possible to target the specific desired varietal traits. CIAT, for example, has had a few experiences of \"drought\" trials in environments with historical severe drought stress, where the trials have been destroyed by flooding (LA Becerra 2011, pers. comm.).Because of cassava's relatively slow early growth, canopy closure can take up to three months or more, leaving the crop vulnerable to weed infestation. Weeds can be a serious constraint to crop growth and yield, and their economic control a major challenge. Typically, manual weed control requires about 40% of labor inputs to produce a cassava crop. Weeding is often done by women, especially in Africa and Asia.Research on eco-efficient weed management has received relatively little emphasis to date. In part this is because most weed management in cassava is still by hand hoeing, especially in Africa. However, this is changing as farmers look for more ways to reduce the high labor inputs and cost of growing cassava. Chemical weed control is possible, and herbicide use is rising, but mainly in Asia and in larger plantation systems elsewhere. Mechanized weeding is somewhat difficult in cassava except during the earliest stages of growth. Researchers face multiple challenges to integrate effective and economical weed control, with eco-efficiency principles, and gender-sensitive approaches. It is a research area that will become increasingly important and will require greater research emphasis.Herbicide-resistant cassava could be a popular option for farmers, as it has been for crops like maize, soybeans, and canola. Technically it will probably not be very difficult to incorporate resistance (e.g., to glyphosate) through transformation protocols. But the licensing, regulatory, and socio-economic issues (e.g., gender implications; consumer acceptance) will likely mean that any such technology is many years from widespread use.Weed control is often the costliest input to cassava production, and it is imperative that science aggressively contribute to eco-efficient solutions as a means to reduce costs of production and increase farmer profits while protecting the environment.Because cassava is among the most tolerant of crops in marginal conditions, it often occupies lands that are prone to erosion. This is true worldwide, but is particularly an issue in the Andean zone of South America and in Southeast Asia. Slow early growth and relatively wide spacing among plants mean that canopy closure can take 2-3 months -a period when the soil remains exposed to the heavy rains which typically occur near planting time. This situation can lead to severe soil erosion with devastating environmental and social consequences. Soil erosion in cassava systems is one of the most urgent problems for the long-term sustainability of cassava-based farming systems to support smallholder farmers.Erosion control can be accomplished through soil preparation practices (e.g., ridge planting; conservation tillage, which leaves soil-protecting residues on the surface and soil-holding roots below the surface); strip cropping; intercropping; terracing; live barriers; practices that allow good ground cover (mulching; use of herbicides instead of hoeing); and practices that promote rapid canopy closure to protect exposed soil from direct rainfall impact (e.g., high early-vigor varieties; fertilization to promote rapid early growth).One of the most successful technologies is planting of vetiver grass barriers (Howeler, 2011b). However, farmers often are reluctant to invest in practices that do not provide short-term payback, especially if land is rented or, otherwise, not securely available for the long term.Very little research has been done on conservation tillage systems for cassava. Clearly there are challenges, namely, the need to plant a large stem piece instead of a small seed, the inevitable soil disturbance that takes place at harvest, and the scarcity of good weed management systems without soil disturbance. Nonetheless, the potential payoff in lowering costs of production, in soil conservation, and in energy conservation makes this a research area worth pursuing.Advances in small-plot mechanization may make no-till planting technologically feasible. Selection for herbicide-resistant varieties would also facilitate no-till technology, but is not a prerequisite for its success. Demonstration plots using farmerparticipatory approaches have been widely used in Asia to highlight the risks of soil erosion and the benefits of implementing preventive measures.The bottom line is that in spite of all these practices being well known at the research level, their adoption worldwide has been limited. The solution is a combination of opportunities provided by the marketplace, education, policy, and research into new avenues for erosion control.When market prices rise, farmers will be more easily convinced to invest in inputs that increase their productivity and profitability. In general, the market for cassava products has been buoyant over the past several years, giving hope that farmers will have greater motivation to invest in long-term sustainability of their systems through eco-efficient technologies.The impact of erosion control is often not immediately evident to farmers, nor easily quantified. Their concept of long-term income loss may not be based on real, field-level data over time. This is also a management area that will depend almost wholly on the public sector initiatives; there are, in a broad sense, few options that can be offered that will be brought about through a profit motive of the private sector. This gives the public sector a heavy responsibility to thoroughly research eco-efficient erosion control methods, to educate growers, and to educate policy-makers on the need for policy support.Eco-efficient pest management systems focus on three main solutions: Host plant resistance, crop management, and biological control. The combination of these approaches can be effective for most pests and pathogens of economic importance in cassava. Use of chemical control has a low priority for research, with the exception of highly targeted applications such as for planting material (stakes) treatment or infestation focal points.Selection for resistance. Cassava evolved under pressure from many pests and diseases, and as a consequence genetic resistance co-evolved and was further brought into play by the conscious or unconscious selection by farmers. In many of the major crops, plant breeders protect nurseries with pesticides generation after generation, such that many resistance genes were probably lost due to genetic drift. In the case of cassava, this has rarely happened. First, cassava breeding has been practiced on a limited scale and for a limited time worldwide. Secondly, most cassava breeders allow natural infestations of pests and pathogens as a way of selecting for resistance. These strategies have allowed a remarkable opportunity for capitalizing on host plant resistance in cassava, without breeders having to use exotic material or wild species in lengthy pre-breeding programs. Host plant resistance is a clear and successful example of the development of eco-efficient practices. Nonetheless, as new pest challenges arise, especially as a result of climate change, there is greater likelihood of the need to delve further into germplasm collections and engage in pre-breeding to extract new resistance genes.Breeders have made excellent gains in developing resistance to several key pests and pathogens, including cassava bacterial blight, CMD, superelongation disease (Sphaceloma manihoticola), Phoma leaf spot, thrips, cassava green mite, and whiteflies (Jennings and Iglesias, 2002). In recent years, molecular tools have begun to aid in selection, specifically with CMD in Africa. A molecular marker for a single-gene resistance not only allows speeding up the breeding process, but it has allowed the selection for resistance in Colombia, where the disease does not exist. Breeders now have a greater ability to combine desired traits from the Americas with the virus resistance needed for adaptation in Africa (Okogbenin et al., 2011). While molecularassisted selection is so far very limited for cassava, this is likely to change quickly in the next few years as the costs of sequencing and of various -omics technologies decline rapidly.Crop management. The long growth cycle of cassava is conducive to the build-up of many types of pests and pathogens. This creates challenges, but also opens up many opportunities during the crop's long period in the field, to introduce variable management packages for suppressing pest and pathogen damage. Some of the common practices that can contribute to pest suppression include adjusting planting date, plant spacing, and intercropping. Early trials in the Eastern Plains of Colombia showed that planting near the end of the rainy season was a viable strategy for reducing losses from bacterial blight and superelongation disease (CIAT, unpublished). One of the challenges of using management practices to control pests and pathogens is to assure that any changes in management do not reduce yields even more than the pest under standard crop management. Biological control. Biological control is one of the most eco-efficient practices possible for pest management. The development time can be relatively rapid (in contrast to the long lead time for developing resistant varieties, for example); there is virtually no trade-off in yield or quality with the application of biocontrol methods; and in many cases, the control can be long lasting without the continued need to reintroduce the organisms.In the Americas, biocontrol agents (parasites and predators) evolved along with the crop during many millennia. However, when traders introduced cassava to Africa and Asia, most of these beneficial organisms were left behind. When new pests were introduced, they were often able to spread uninhibited by the natural enemies they faced in their evolutionary homeland. There have been several examples of the introduction of natural enemies to successfully control mites and insects. In Africa, the cassava mealybug caused devastating losses until Anagyrus lopezi (a parasitic wasp) -an effective natural enemy -was introduced in the 1980s, saving billions of dollars in potential crop losses (Zeddies et al., 2001).The same predator was introduced to Thailand in 2010 after the cassava mealybug appeared there. By 2012, monitoring studies showed that A. Lopezi had become established throughout nearly the entire cassava-growing area where the mealybug was found, and is effective in control (Chariensak 2012, pers. comm.). It is hoped that the parasite will establish widely in other countries as well, following the mealybug spread in the region, to reduce population densities to economically insignificant levels.The cassava green mite also became a serious introduced pest of cassava in Africa by the late 1980s. Many different phytoseiid predators (also mites) act as biological control agents against the green mite. They probably account for the absence of major outbreaks of the green mite in the Americas (Bellotti et al., 1987). CIAT and IITA introduced many of these phytoseiid predators into Africa but Typhlodromalus aripo was most successful, reducing populations of the green mite by 35-60% with a parallel increase in fresh-root yield by 30-37% (Bellotti, 2002). Implementation of the biological control by T. aripo depends on the morphology of the apex and on the volatiles emitted by the plant host. Both characteristics are determined by the cassava genotype. This is a promising case of genotype-by-biological control interaction, hypothetically representing an opportunity to breed for a cassava plant that will favor the establishment and survival of the predator for a more efficient control of the green mite.Biological control never results in complete control, which leaves open the potential for fluctuations in levels of pest populations (similar to most types of host plant resistance as well). In some years and in some locations, economic damage levels may be significant. Like other types of pest management, biological control must be accompanied by constant monitoring, preparation for additional releases, and preparation for supplemental management within an integrated pest management system.Despite cassava's global importance, the research investment has historically been far below that for other crops of similar importance. One of the reasons is its cultivation almost exclusively in developing countries. While there has been more public and private sector interest in recent years, there is not by any means a level of research funding that allows research institutions to carry out the kind of comprehensive research agenda possible for rice, wheat, maize, or potatoes, for example. This means that we need to be especially creative to find solutions with the most output per unit of input.Research needs to begin by understanding the combinations of biotic and abiotic stresses and pressures that farmers face now and may face in the future. Only then can we offer an effective means to find the right balance of traits and practices to optimize economic yield for the grower, while protecting the environment. One of the most effective strategies over some 40 years of research at CIAT has been the identification of research sites that are representative of broad target regions, in terms of soils, climate, pests, and pathogens. This has allowed effective development of integrated variety development and management systems that balance the needs for adaptation in the agroecological zone, along with yield potential and root quality. As techniques are developed or new genes identified, they can then be incorporated into the system to fine-tune the adaptation and resistance features.Cassava is exposed to a wide array of stresses during its growth in most parts of the world. Breeders and agronomists do not have the luxury of a long history of research to adequately understand mechanisms and the genetic basis for eco-efficient responses. Therefore, until now we have mainly relied on the plant response in selection environments and with management practices that place the crop under conditions that farmers will typically encounter, or can reasonably and economically create through use of inputs. In this way, without the deep understanding of physiology or genetics of each trait, we have developed varieties and management practices that contribute to eco-efficient production. Additional investment, an ever more precise set of measurement tools for plant response, and genetic tools for crop manipulation should provide greater progress.In the arena of cassava technology development, some of the world's greatest assets are the germplasm collections around the world. CIAT holds the largest of these as an in vitro collection at headquarters in Cali, Colombia. The CIAT genebank holds about 5500 landrace accessions, along with another approximately 600 advanced varieties and breeding lines. The collection is available to all interested parties, under the conditions of exchange and use of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA).The genebank probably represents most of the genetic diversity that exists in cassava, although the actual tests of this hypothesis have yet to be carried out. With the decreasing costs of sequencing and molecular marker development, the time is right to begin the genome-wide characterization of cassava genetic diversity and to fill gaps in the collection (see also next section). Nonetheless, based on the coverage of collected areas, we can probably make a reasonably safe assumption that the existing diversity is adequate to continue to make progress in genetic improvement for many years to come. On the other hand, there are known gaps in the collection that need to be filled before valuable diversity is lost. CIAT's collection has limited representation from Central America or Bolivia, and no accessions from Suriname or French Guyana, for example.In addition to cultivated cassava, there are some 100 wild relatives that are poorly collected and poorly evaluated. Many populations are at risk in their native habitats due to urbanization and expansion of agriculture. It is imperative to extend the collection of these species for their future potential contributions to eco-efficient production solutions.Africa has had limited exchange of germplasm with the Americas or with Asia due to the presence of some viruses in Africa that do not exist elsewhere, and several viruses in the Americas that also do not exist in Africa or Asia. Modern molecular methods now allow a very high level of security for the detection and cleaning of viruses, but it is still very difficult to exchange vegetative material between Africa and the Americas. Exchange between Asia and the Americas has been relatively straightforward.The CIAT genebank is an engine for ecoefficient technologies -a resource that has already been extensively tapped to produce incomegenerating technologies for farmers worldwide.But it has much more to offer in the future as the need for new traits expands, and as our ability to find those traits improves. The coordinated phenotyping and genotyping of the cassava genetic resources held in genebanks will be a core strategy toward development of eco-efficient technologies to improve people's livelihoods from cassava while protecting the environment.The development of molecular marker techniques for genetic analysis has increased our knowledge of cassava genetics and our understanding of the structure and behavior of the cassava genome. While microsatellites have been the basis for most work in cassava genetics, other valuable markers have also been used -including random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers -to produce cassava genetic maps.The availability of a cassava genome sequence since 2006 has allowed the identification of thousands of candidate simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers which may be used for genetic mapping and marker-assisted selection. However, the sequencing of multiple genotypes (including wild species) would provide the cassava community with a much greater density of markers in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). These SNPs can be used to construct improved genetic maps and look for trait associations; the high density of SNPs will increase the likelihood of identifying markers tightly linked to loci encoding traits of interest such as drought tolerance or whitefly resistance.The combination of sequences from both wild species as well as cassava itself will give researchers the opportunity to discover genomic regions and individual genes which have played a role in the domestication of cassava. Having whole genome sequences allows the exploration of copy-number variations (CNVs) and genomic rearrangements which may be related to different characteristics of interest. While use of SNP markers can focus the search for causative trait loci, having a large number of genomic sequences from a variety of genotypes for a given region provides the wider genomic context and will enhance genomics-assisted breeding in cassava, boosting our breeding activities to develop desirable breeding lines in a shorter term.Molecular technologies have evolved at astonishing speed. The cost and efficiency of genotyping have advanced so much that the phenotyping that is often required along the molecular work is now the real bottleneck. Deficient field data and unreliable phenotypic information constrains the applied uses of molecular markers in cassava genetic enhancement. Plans are underway to sequence a large sample representing nearly the full range of cassava genetic diversity, set to begin in late 2012 and 2013.Cassava conversion to marketable products can involve a wide range of processing techniques and some of them produce large amounts of waste that can contribute significantly to environmental pollution and depletion of water resources (FAO, 2001). Into the early 1990s, much of Thailand's cassava was chipped and dried on large patios, a process that was essentially pollution free and relied primarily on sun energy for drying (plus use of tractor power for turning and collecting the chips). With the rise of the starch industry throughout Southeast Asia, and the ethanol industry in China, waste management is a growing concern, and many creative new technologies and systems are being developed to minimize environmental impact and increase profitability.The main issues are: The treatment of effluent waters is a major issue in the process of starch extraction. It results in major economic costs (if the effluents are not properly recycled or otherwise managed) or environmental costs (if effluents are dumped into the surrounding environment). CLAYUCA Corporation has developed technology to efficiently produce high-quality flour that can substitute for starch for many uses, but whose processing has far less impact on the environment. Water is used only in the whole-root washing, while the flour is extracted simply by grinding dried root.Cassava markets will continue to change quickly. Eco-efficient production and processing technologies are closely linked and need to be developed in parallel. This can be quite challenging, given the lead time required for many types of technology, and especially for the breeding of new varieties.Two examples of production technologies that impact eco-efficiency of processing involve variations in starch functional properties:• The identification of a natural mutation of amylose-free starch in cassava (Ceballos et al., 2007) has generated a keen interest and investment by the starch sector. This mutation will allow industry to develop certain starchbased products without the chemical modification that is currently required, with potential benefits to both the environment and human health. • A different starch mutation (Ceballos et al., 2008) was generated through mutagenesis, resulting in the production of small starch granules (about 1/3 the normal size) with rough surfaces. This mutation would be ideal for the bioethanol industry as the starch is more easily degraded into simple sugars, a necessary step before fermentation can be initiated. This should result in lower energy use in the conversion process.A FAO study (FAO, 2001) concluded that cassava processing can have negative -mainly site-specific -effects on the environment, by producing unpleasant odors and an unsightly display of waste. However, the long-term and broad-based impact on the environment is generally minimal and can be corrected by proper waste treatment with technologies that are presently available or under development.Moreover, there is ever greater economic incentive to make use of the by-products from the development process of marketable value-added products. The residue from starch factories can be used in animal feed rations, to reapply to fields as a crop nutrient, or as a substrate for the culture of mushrooms, for example. While policy will be an important element for limiting environmental impact from cassava processing, the moreeffective strategies will be based on methods that generate greater income for processors.As mentioned at the outset of this chapter, there is an emerging consensus that cassava is among the most promising options of tropical crops in the context of rising temperatures and increasingly uncertain rainfall patterns. Achieving an ecoefficient response to climate change represents one of the great challenges of agricultural research, and cassava presents unique opportunities.Climate change may have direct effects on crop growth and development (temperature, rainfall, CO 2 levels) or indirect effects (soil organic matter, soil erosion, pest and disease patterns), and therefore the needed response through ecoefficient solutions can be complex and far-ranging.Climate maps combining temperature and rainfall parameters specific to cassava's growth responses (Figure 9-2) indicate that cassava will probably continue to be grown in nearly all areas where it is currently adapted. This is largely because of its combined high temperature and drought tolerance, even in some areas where these changes will create severe stress for other crops. In fact, cassava is likely to expand into new areas of the subtropics that become more suitable as temperatures rise, and into areas where more-sensitive crops decline or disappear.On the whole, cassava is tolerant of very high temperatures compared to many crops. This is in part because there is no critical stage, such as flowering, when brief periods of high temperatures will cause drastic yield losses. Increasing temperatures may not have a large direct effect on cassava production. On the other hand, areas that become too hot for other crops could create new growing areas for cassava to fill the gap. Some climate models show that India could be especially affected by rising temperatures, with broad shifts away from grains and pulses in some areas (Ceballos et al., 2011).Possibly the most significant effect of temperature rise on cassava's adaptation will be to allow it to move into higher-altitude and higher/ lower-latitude regions. Currently, cassava's limit at the Equator is at about 2000 masl, and this just for a narrow range of germplasm accessions from the Andean zone of the Americas, especially Colombia. These extended new highland areas for cassava are likely to be most important in East Africa, and in the Andes of Colombia and Ecuador. Currently cassava can be grown in latitudes near the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. Global warming may extend this range, as winters become milder. This is of particular interest in China, which is looking for options to expand planted area but has a relatively limited region within the subtropics that is suitable for cassava. This is not to say that global warming will have overall positive effects on agriculture, but there will be opportunities for farmers to adapt with new crops and new practices if science can provide the appropriate technological support.Drought promises to be one of the most widespread negative impacts of climate change on crop production in general. Lower overall rainfall and greater uncertainty both come into play in climate change scenarios. Therefore, it is logical that breeding programs in many crops have begun to take into account major efforts to select for drought tolerance. Cassava models appear to indicate a different strategy.First, cassava will likely move into areas where other crops are constrained, especially grain crops, with their susceptibility to drought during certain development stages, such as flowering and early grain filling. But cassava is broadly drought tolerant already, so it will do quite well in areas where other crops cannot succeed. But the question remains about the advisability of stressing selection for drought tolerance in traditional cassava-growing areas that are already dry, and will become drier with climate change. Although breeding for drought tolerance has been limited, there are clear indications from physiological studies that selection for even better tolerance could succeed. So it is a matter of comparing returns on investment from alternative breeding goals. Climate change models and crop models suggest that other constraints brought about by climate change, and especially the effects of pests and diseases, are likely to be more severe, and often more amenable to management through breeding for resistance/tolerance than is drought.The other side of the rainfall issue is excess water. Cassava typically does not tolerate waterlogging. Root rots can become common if soils are waterlogged even for relatively short periods of time. Breeding has shown little promise, and in most cases management practices are probably more appropriate as an adaptation strategy. Global cassava suitability will increase 5.1% on average by 2050, while many areas of Latin America will suffer negative impacts Atmospheric CO 2 is one of the major causes of climate change and has increased by 40% from a pre-industrial revolution baseline. Confinedenvironment studies indicate that increases in atmospheric CO 2 concentration could result in a reduction in root production. Concentration of cyanogenic glucosides in the roots was not affected by increases in CO 2 . On the other hand, there was a large increase of glucosides in the leaves of plants grown in higher CO 2 concentrations (Gleadow and Woodrow, 2002;Gleadow et al., 2009). These results contradict earlier ones reported by Imai et al. (1984). Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) methods allow field evaluation of crops under elevated CO 2 concentrations which simulate the predicted levels for the decades to come (El-Sharkawy, 2009). These studies suggest that photosynthetic efficiency would increase more in C 3 (like potatoes and cassava) than in C 4 crops (like maize and rice) (Long et al., 2004;2006). Modeling and FACE results could guide the molecular optimization of the photosynthetic apparatus to maximize carbon gains without increasing crop inputs (Rosenthal and Ort, 2012).There are several reasons why risks are increasing for introduction and spread of pests and pathogens into new areas. These include:• More international travel • Greater interest in introducing new materials by uninformed travelers, e.g., businessmen or women managing cassava plantations or processing plants • Greater potential for introduced pests or pathogens to encounter host plants (increasing area planted to cassava globally, e.g., larger contiguous cassava plantings that allow pests to spread quickly) • Climate change that transforms less suitable environments into more suitable ones for introduced pests or pathogens • The interest in new crops, such as Jatropha (also a member of the Euphorbiaceae family) which can be a reservoir of pests and diseases that can also affect cassava. The recent interest in this crop has resulted in vast and unregulated exchange of germplasm.The first defense against pest and pathogen spread to new areas is the double-pronged approach of education and regulation. The principle audience needs to be the general public -about the risks of moving uncontrolled plant materials and agricultural products across national borders. This is not to downplay the importance of official channels. Most countries have strict quarantine regulations on the books, but lack personnel and budget for enforcement. Understanding the risks is the primary motivation for investing in better enforcement.Climate change modeling, layered with pest adaptation maps, illustrates the potential spread to new areas in the context of climate change. This allows the application of resources in hotspot areas for monitoring, diagnosis, and management. It is expected that pests affecting cassava will evolve into more dynamic patterns, particularly as a result of increased temperatures that reduce the relevance of diapause and/or shorten their life cycle (Ceballos et al., 2011).Figures 9-3 and 9-4 illustrate areas where cassava green mite and whitefly, respectively, are likely to increase or decrease in severity due to climate change by 2020. For both species, there will be widespread effects in the Americas and Africa, but less so in Asia.Effective pest and pathogen monitoring and diagnosis systems are essential to early detection and effective management. Fortunately, such systems may be implemented across a number of crops, and do not need to be re-invented for each individual crop. The PlantWise system of CABI, for example, may be a good model to incorporate cassava data and take advantage of a system that is applicable for a broad range of crops. A pilot system is being established for Southeast Asia, which should develop into globally applied systems for information exchange about pests and diseases. Some of the new soil-related challenges likely to be exacerbated by climate change are: More rapid loss of organic matter due to higher soil temperatures; planting in areas more vulnerable to erosion (e.g., further up hillsides as temperatures rise); and greater nutrient leaching in areas where rainfall has increased.For cassava in an era of climate change, one of the great challenges for sustainable soil management is in areas where the crop expands to replace species that are less adapted to drier conditions. Unless this expansion into new areas is accompanied by appropriate management and technologies, there is a risk that growers without the experience of growing the crop will use practices that exacerbate erosion. Certainly there should also be attempts to introduce diversification programs, such as the planting of perennial crops/ pastures/trees in the most vulnerable areas.Conservation tillage or no-tillage systems have had relatively little application in cassava. Alternatives to conventional tillage will be important both in areas of reduced and increased rainfall. In reduced rainfall, conservation tillage conserves soil water. Under heavy rainfall, it reduces erosion and improves soil structure for better drainage. These advantages need to be weighed against the possibility of sacrificing yield or income as a result of adoption of these practices. The development of herbicide-tolerant genotypes would greatly facilitate the adoption of reduced-tillage practices. Technically, this should be relatively easy through transgenic methods, but the licensing, regulatory, and consumer acceptance issues would be huge hurdles to ultimate success. There need to be intensified efforts at the discovery of herbicide tolerance that is not transgenic. The most likely approaches are through screening of a broad genetic base of progeny from selfed genebank accessions, and through mutation and selection at the cellular level.Little is accomplished in isolation. Science and its successful application require partnerships among a range of public and private organizations. There is a need for concerted capacity building and interchange to assess and develop eco-efficiency goals and methods for cassava technologies (see Chapter 14, this volume). The new CGIAR structure takes a step in that direction through capitalizing on the potential synergies among centers working on several vegetatively propagated crops, and by bringing together the wide range of partners that can collaborate toward common goals. This new CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (CRP-RTB) continues many of the same goals and activities as previously carried out by CIAT and IITA for cassava. However, there is now greater emphasis on linking research to development outcomes and on realizing the synergies among the various root, tuber, and banana crops and the centers that work on them (see www.rtb.cgiar. org/). The long history of collaboration between CGIAR centers and other entities working on cassava will be further enhanced under the new system.There is a wide contrast on the use of cassava ranging from a key element in subsistence farming in Africa to mostly a cash crop to be used by different processing industries in Southeast Asia. CIAT is aware that in many cases wellintentioned interventions result in undesirable unforeseen impacts. A major thrust in our research is toward the gradual transformation of cassava from subsistence farming into incomegenerating crop. However, it has to be acknowledged that whenever this occurs, some gender-related issues may arise. In many resource-limited farming households, it is women who stay in the farm attending to the different chores, while men go to the villages in search of income-generating activities. If cassava becomes a cash crop, it is likely that the role women and men play will change. Many social scientists have expressed their concern that some of these changes may be negative, but also could result in positive trends, such as \"the return of men to the farm for a reunited family.\" The impact of turning cassava into a cash crop from the gender perspective is difficult to predict, not to mention to modulate, from a research position. It is important, however, to monitor them and make whatever intervention may be required to maximize the positive impacts while minimizing the negative ones.Researchers need to monitor potential genderrelated impact. Moreover, we actively search for potential areas where gender plays an important role. For instance, it has been recognized for many years that it is typically women who are in charge of weeding cassava fields in many regions of Africa. This implies that very often, women will invest the first two months of the crop in weed-control activities. Development of herbicide tolerance is therefore one such issue. It is envisioned that, in principle, this trait should benefit women as they could redirect their effort to other more-productive endeavors. Whenever the trait is identified or induced, however, careful analysis of its expected advantages will be tested through participatory approaches to make sure that the technology is well appreciated by the women we are targeting to benefit.Another activity typically linked to women and children is the peeling of cassava, for example, in the production of farinha in Northeast Brazil or gari and fufu in Western Africa. It is known that peel thickness is another trait that may offer a gender bias. Awareness of such a situation is relevant for orienting research in the right direction. A thin peel is desirable for those industries where the entire root is processed, since it maximizes the proportion of valuable tissue. On the other hand, a thick peel facilitates the operation of manual peeling reducing the overall cost of such operations, thus maintaining its competitiveness. Most importantly, gender bias studies need to be part of research design from the outset, rather than an afterthought after a technology is already developed and disseminated.Policies aimed specifically at eco-efficiency of crop research are nearly non-existent in developing countries. The scientific community has a major challenge to educate, inform, and advocate for such policies. We present a few examples here, although this is not by any means a comprehensive list.Developing countries that support technological and economic progress as a means of addressing food security and equity will find that cassava, where it is adapted, can often play significant food security and equity roles.Policies that favor new industries can open opportunities for cassava markets. The broad range of products that can derive from cassava provides an ideal vehicle for new industry development. Multiple industries can evolve from the many cassava end-uses, to the advantage of cassava growers. Multiple market opportunities for farmers mean that there are likely to be better prices and lower swings in the market prices. A key example of this kind of intervention is the policy to mix 10% cassava flour with wheat flour for the baking industry. However, as discussed during the West Africa Root and Tuber Crops Conference (Accra, Ghana, 12-16 Sept 2011) (Dixon, 2011), policies need to be turned into laws for an effective impact.Open versus protectionist trade policies will impact the kinds of markets where cassava can be competitive. Certainly the global tendency is toward more open markets, but there are many exceptions. Strong policies that protect local agricultural and industrial development are often a necessary short-to medium-term strategy in order to develop a competitive global position. On the other hand, protectionist policies tend to promote inefficiencies and, ultimately, higher prices for consumers. In any case, trade policies will rarely be developed specifically with the cassava market in mind, but rather with a broad agricultural or industrial vision.China is leading the way in biofuels from cassava, as a result of a dual policy that aims, on the one hand, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and, on the other hand, to keep staple foods from competing in the biofuels market. Thus, cassava, as an efficient energy producer and with a very minor role as a food in China, is an ideal option. In Africa the situation is more complex, where cassava for biofuels is likely to compete with food markets, and where most of those who rely on cassava for food are not able to absorb cost increases even of small levels without suffering serious consequences.Thailand attempted for many years to support crop diversification in the northeast of the country, to prevent the continued spread of cassava into fragile soils. The policy had limited success because cassava is so much better adapted than most other crops that can provide a profit to farmers. These types of policies are, however, rather rare on a global basis. In order to succeed, they need to either strictly prevent the growing of cassava in inappropriate environments, or provide equal or better alternatives through technology support and/or subsidies that give farmers attractive options. In fact, effective policies that address the use of fragile landscapes are sorely needed in many countries. Along with policy, education of growers and the offering of ecoefficient technologies are needed for positive impact.Until recent times, there was nearly no private sector support to cassava research. This is changing, but slowly. In Thailand, for example, the private sector provides modest support for development of specialty starch varieties, provides extension services in the form of advice on management practices, and provides growers with biological control organisms for the cassava mealybug, a newly emerging pest problem. There are examples elsewhere as well of important but quite limited industry support to technology development. This means that public support for research is the main determinant of the success of cassava research in any given country. CIAT and IITA have strong multidisciplinary research programs, but they also rely on the capacity of national partners to jointly develop that technology and deliver it to farmers or to industry. Policy that supports a sustainable research and extension system is essential to the ability of cassava to play its full role as a vehicle for eco-efficient development.The public sector for cassava research is seriously underfunded in most countries. In Africa, donor support in the last few decades has made a dent, but the long-term consequences of donordependent funding of research are uncertain. On the one hand, it seems to be a necessary intermediate step, while local public and private support and capacity are developed. All too often, however, this support is not prioritized, leading to programs falling by the wayside when donor funding diminishes or dries up. There needs to be much more support from studies illustrating the impact of investment in research by national and local governments.The long cycle of cassava from planting to harvest often implies a heavy burden for the farmers because of the long time required to recover their investments. It is becoming a common practice for governments through different banking systems to provide soft credits to farmers, particularly in cases where they have some sort of agreement with the processing sector and after it has been demonstrated that proper inputs and management practices will be used in growing the crop. This practice offers several advantages as it promotes linkages between the production and processing sector and encourages the adoption of technologies for the sustainable and competitive production of cassava. Within the same policies, farmers can also have access to crop insurance. For insurance to have more widespread impact, however, more data on production risks are necessary.CIAT works with partners to develop technologies that are more productive, profitable and competitive, sustainable, resilient as well as more sustainable. The following summarizes how this relates to CIAT's cassava research for development.• More productive: Providing inexpensive and nutritious food for poor consumers. This is largely the CIAT legacy of its first 45 years, by producing clones with high and stable productivity, and giving special consideration to dry-matter content (Kawano, 2003;Kawano and Cock, 2005). • More profitable and competitive: Creating new opportunities for growers to increase their incomes. New or expanded markets are needed for cassava farmers to pull themselves out of poverty. Without markets to absorb increased productivity, moving beyond subsistence is only a dream for many.High-value traits such as the waxy and small-granule starches (Ceballos et al., 2007;2008;Sánchez et al., 2009) The challenge is to continue to address equity issues as scale of production increases and more-sophisticated markets are developed.Specialty cassavas, such as waxy-starch varieties, should lead not only to increased value and higher incomes to farmers, but also should promote a closer association between farmers and processors (e.g., contract farming) which can favor both layers of the value chain.While biofuels are often seen as working against equity issues, examples in cassava illustrate other options. CLAYUCA Corporation is developing a model for cassava based on decentralized small plants at the village level that produce 50% ethanol, which is then shipped to a more sophisticated central plant for dehydration to 99%.Rice is a relatively new crop in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Although it was introduced 1 Latin American Fund for Irrigated Rice (FLAR), Cali, Colombia. 2 Leader, Rice Program, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia. * Corresponding author: g.zorrilla@cgiar.org into the region in the sixteenth century by Spanish colonists, it was not widely grown until the twentieth century. It is now grown throughout the region, in a wide range of agroecosystems, ranging from upland systems in the Brazilian Cerrados and some hilly areas of Bolivia, Colombia, and Central America to high-tech irrigated systems in the Southern Cone region. About one million farmers in the region, 80% of them poor smallholders, depend on rice as their main source of energy, employment, and income (Maclean et al., 2002).Rice is now the most important food grain in most of the tropical areas of LAC, where it supplies more calories in people's diets than wheat, maize, cassava, or potatoes, and is also the leading source of protein for the poorest 20% of the population in tropical areas (Maclean et al., 2002). The crop provides an average of 27% of daily calorie intake in LAC as a whole, ranging from 8% in Central America to 47% in the Caribbean region (FAOSTAT).Total production of paddy rice increased from around 8 million tons in 1961 to more than 28 million tons in 2009, an increase of over 250% (Table 10-1). Over this period the area under rice increased by only 35%, hence the majority of the increase in production came from yield gains. However, there is still a negative balance between production and consumption in the region as a whole.There is thus clearly a need to increase rice production in the region. It is vital, however, that this is done through eco-efficient production systems. Eco-efficiency implies producing more while using fewer resources and creating less waste and pollution. Eco-efficient rice production should be profitable, competitive with other agricultural or commercial activities, and ecologically sustainable. It should also be resilient in the face of climate change and socially equitable, giving small-, medium-, and large-scale producers access to new practices and technologies. In summary, eco-efficient rice production allows farmers to derive more benefits from rice cultivation using fewer resources.FLAR is a public-private partnership between local rice institutions and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). It was established in 1995 to improve people's lives through the This chapter summarizes some results from the main interventions FLAR and its members are promoting, with special emphasis on their impact on eco-efficiency. The so-called \"green revolution\" in rice started with the release of the semi-dwarf variety IR8 in 1966 by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines (Hargrove and Cabanilla, 1979;Khush, 1999). Less than two years later IR8 was introduced in Colombia by Peter Jennings and a pioneering breeding program was initiated by CIAT, the Colombian Institute of Agriculture (ICA, its Spanish acronym), and the National Federation of Rice Growers (FEDEARROZ, its Spanish acronym). This program soon developed new semi-dwarf varieties that increased rice production in Colombia and in the whole region. Average yields in Colombia rose from 1.5 t/ha in 1965 to 4.4 t/ha in 1975 (Scobie and Posada, 1977). Between 1968 and 1990 rice yields in Latin America increased by 20% due to new semi-dwarf varieties (Muchnik de Rubinstein, 1985).Between 1975 and 1995, some 250 improved rice varieties were released in LAC. The adoption of these improved varieties enhanced food security and reduced the real price of rice (Maclean et al., 2002).FLAR's goal is to develop a cooperative and efficient breeding program aimed at producing and releasing high-yielding varieties with desirable agronomic and grain quality traits. The program is based at CIAT headquarters in Cali, Colombia, but is administratively independent of the Center's rice-breeding program. This arrangement gives FLAR immediate access to improved material developed by the Center and provides a direct link with other international research institutions, such as IRRI.FLAR's breeding program focuses on developing varieties for tropical and temperate zones. FLAR breeders introduce new materials, make around 800 hundred triple crosses a year, advance and select 5000 to 6000 breeding lines in different environments, and produce and select elite breeding lines (FL lines). Breeding and initial evaluation are done at CIAT headquarters and the Santa Rosa Research Station near Villavicencio in Colombia's Llanos Orientales or Eastern Plains. Elite lines are selected annually in nurseries called \"VIOFLAR Trópico\" and \"VIOFLAR Templado\" and distributed to FLAR members. Members evaluate and further select these FL lines in their local environments, register lines that perform well, and release them as new varieties. The first variety of FLAR origin was released in 2003, and a total of 40 new cultivars have since been registered in 13 countries up to the end of 2011.FLAR members invest their own resources in the program and contribute to the breeding strategy. This encourages greater engagement between the members and the network. One common problem faced in open germplasm networks is the very poor feedback of information on the performance of lines at the different testing sites. In contrast, FLAR members provide performance information on about 80% of the material received, providing FLAR breeders with the feedback needed to fine-tune their breeding strategies.The program is subdivided into tropical and temperate regions. The main common breeding objectives in both subprograms are: high yield potential; resistance to rice blast [Magnaporthe grisea (Herbert) Barr (anamorph Pyricularia grisea)] and other fungal diseases; resistance to lodging; high milling and cooking quality; and tolerance of delayed harvest (i.e., grain retention). For the tropics, the program is also breeding for resistance to rice hoja blanca virus and its insect vector [Tagosodes orizicolus (Muir)]. For the temperate region, tolerance to low temperatures is an important trait. Planting early in the season is critical in the Southern Cone to allow flowering to coincide with peak solar radiation and ensure good grain filling. Thus, cold tolerance at seedling stage is needed, as is some cold tolerance at the reproductive stage, because low temperatures may occur any time during the season.The following are some examples of the characteristics and uptake of the varieties developed through FLAR.Venezuela 21 was the first variety from FL material to be released by a FLAR member (FUNDARROZ, 2003). It has excellent yield potential (8 t/ha) and yield stability across seasons, much better disease tolerance than checks, and good grain quality. By 2009, it accounted for 31.6% of the total rice seed market in Venezuela.The Panama Institute of Agricultural Research (IDIAP, its Spanish acronym) released two FLbased varieties in 2005: IDIAP 54-05 and IDIAP 145-05 (Camargo, 2006). Both have good resistance to the main diseases occurring in Panama (rice blast, and panicle blight caused by Burkholderia glumae), give high yields under both rainfed and irrigated conditions, and have excellent grain milling quality. In the 2010/11 cropping season, each of them was planted on more than 20% of the country's rice area.In Costa Rica, Seeds of the New Millennium S.A. (SENUMISA, its Spanish acronym) released Palmar 18 in 2006. The variety has high yield potential under both irrigated and rainfed conditions, good tolerance to main diseases (rice blast, panicle blight, and grain discoloration caused by a fungus complex), a short growing cycle, and excellent grain quality. By 2009, it accounted for 46.7% of the certified rice seed produced in Costa Rica (Oviedo, 2010).The Guyana Rice Development Board (GRDB) released GRDB FL 10 in 2009. In trials between 2008 and 2010, GRDB LF 10 outyielded the check variety by an average of 28.3% across spring and autumn cropping seasons (Persaud, 2010). By the beginning of 2011, the variety covered 15% of the area planted to rice in Guyana.Genetics of Rice S.A. (GENARROZ, its Spanish acronym) released Jaragua FL in the Dominican Republic in 2010 (Moquete, 2010). This variety was selected from FL material introduced in 2007. Jaragua FL has high yield potential (more than 8 t/ha) under a range of planting systems and environments, excellent milling performance (62-64% of whole rice), very low percentage of \"white belly\" (opaque endosperm), and excellent cooking quality. It also has very good tolerance to major fungal diseases and some tolerance to saline and acidic soils.Eco-efficient agriculture depends not only on good varieties, but also on several other factors, such as sustainable use of natural resources, farmers' skills, and crop management techniques. The yields for farmers in LAC remain well below the yield potential of the varieties grown, largely as a result of suboptimal crop management (Pulver, 2001). Bridging this yield gap could increase rice production in LAC by 27% (Sanint, 2004).In 2003, FLAR, with financial support from the Common Fund for Commodities (CFC), initiated a technology transfer program in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and Portuguesa and Guarico states, Venezuela, aimed at reducing this yield gap. The program later expanded to include Argentina and Uruguay in the Southern Cone and Costa Rica and Nicaragua in the tropical zone.The program focused on six basic strategic management practices:1. Appropriate planting time 2. Low seeding rate 3. Use of high-quality seed and seed treatment against insect pests 4. Early weed control 5. Fertilizer management 6. Irrigation management These practices were usually complemented by site-specific practices developed by local research and/or through farmer-participatory research at the trial sites.FLAR employed a farmer-to-farmer extension approach, using a farmer leader to transfer the technology to other growers. At each location, an initial survey of the rice sector was conducted to identify the main technological weaknesses. Innovative farmers who had the capacity and willingness to communicate their experiences were then selected. These farmer leaders received farmer leaders received extensive training in the recommended practices, and demonstration plots were established on each farmer leader's land. Groups of growers in the vicinity of each pilot farm visited the demonstration plots regularly and discussed their observations with the farmer leader, often leading to modification of the recommended practices. These growers were then assisted in adopting the recommended practices.Following the success of the initial project, activities were extended to Bolivia, Chile, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, and Panama.In total, the program worked with nearly 8000 farmers growing nearly 600,000 ha of rice, and achieved yield increases between 0.6 and 1.7 t/ha (Table 10-2).The State of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil and neighboring areas of Argentina and Uruguay provide good examples of the impact of improved crop management on rice production. Since early 2000, this region has shown a revolution in rice production driven by improved crop management. FLAR has had different grades of involvement in this process working with the Rio Grande Rice Institute (IRGA, its Portuguese acronym) in Brazil, the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA, its Spanish acronym) in Argentina, the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA, its Spanish acronym) in Uruguay and the Rice Farmers Association (ACA, its Spanish acronym) also in Uruguay to boost rice production. As a result of these programs, total annual rice production increased from an average of 7.0 million tons in 2000-2002 to 9.4 million tons in 2006-2008, an increase of 35% (Figure 10-1). Over the same period, yield increased from 5.4 t/ha to 7.2 t/ha, an increase of 33%, while the area planted has been almost stable. Thus, the increase in production was largely the result of increased yields. Over this period, there was little change in the varieties planted, hence the production gains are the result of improved agronomic practices. Less than a quarter of the rice area in LAC is irrigated, ranging from 79% in Brazil to only 1% in Mexico. However, overall the region is well endowed with water resources (Table 10-3).Even Mexico, nearly one-third of which is arid, has extensive water resources in its central and southern areas. Additionally, most of the renewable water resources in Latin America are surface water, which is essentially from rain water. Consequently, the problem in Latin America is not scarcity of water, but ineffective use of water resources to produce food and reduce poverty in the rural areas. FLAR has been investigating the potential of water harvesting to increase the use of irrigation in upland rice production. In 2008, FLAR and CIAT initiated a project on \"Transformation of upland to irrigated rice through use of water harvesting in Costa Rica, Mexico, and Nicaragua\". The project is sponsored by CFC and co-sponsored by SENUMISA in Costa Rica, the Mexican Rice Council, and the Nicaraguan Association of Rice Farmers. This pilot project is introducing proven water harvesting techniques, training local staff to identify suitable sites for catchment facilities, and demonstrating the economic benefits of a diversified rice-based production system under irrigation. The target audience is small-scale farmers currently involved solely in rainfed agriculture. The project is focusing on simple, low-tech, low-cost water harvesting techniques, essentially small-and medium-sized earth dams constructed in farmers' fields to take advantage of topography and an adequate water catchment basin. These dams allow farmers to harvest and store rain water that can then be used for full or supplemental irrigation by gravity. The ponds can also be used for fish production, bringing another high-value product to farmers.Harvesting water during the rainy season allows for high-yielding irrigated agriculture during the high-solar-radiation dry season and doubles job opportunities in regions like northern Nicaragua, where there are 6 months with minimum activity on the farms.In trials in Mexico, despite being established too late in the season (April/May 2010) for optimum yield, irrigated rice still yielded 65% more than neighboring non-irrigated rice crops (Table 10-4). If the crops had been established in February as planned, yields of 10 t/ha would have been achievable.In Jalapa Department in north-central Nicaragua, one farmer planting irrigated rice during the dry season reported a yield of 10.5 t/ha, and a net profit of US$2,000/ha. This compares with net profits of less than US$100/ha for rainfed maize and less than US$50/ha for rainfed beans grown during the rainy season.These initial results demonstrate the potential of water harvesting and storage to diversify smallholder farmers' production options and to boost income and food security. FLAR has developed a holistic approach to improving the rice industry in LAC, addressing genetics, crop management, and natural resources utilization. Being a public-private alliance in which most rice farmers' organizations are represented along with national research institutes and private companies, it helps not only small-scale, resource-poor rice growers, but also the whole rice sector.There are enormous challenges ahead, including rising food demand, competition for land, the need for reducing environmental footprint, and dealing with climate change. New products from agricultural research addressing yield potential, resistance or tolerance to changing pests and diseases, resistance to abiotic stresses and new quality requirements will be essential to cope with those challenges. FAO, with its many members from almost all Latin American countries, provides a platform through which the products of research can be rapidly extended to farmers, increasing food production, reducing rural poverty, and enhancing food security.Climate change is one of the greatest challenges to human development in general and food security in particular in recent history. Even if we act decisively now, temperatures by 2050 will be at least 2 °C, and perhaps as much as 5 °C, above those of pre-industrial times (IPCC, 2007;The World Bank, 2010), threatening sustainable food production worldwide. Developing countries are more exposed to the hazards of climate change and less resilient to them (Morton, 2007). Moreover, they will have to bear an estimated 75-80% of the costs associated with the impacts of climate change (Hope, 2009;Smith et al., 2009;The World Bank, 2010). Undernourished people, estimated at 925 million worldwide in 2010 (FAO, 2010a), most of whom live in the tropics, are especially vulnerable.Agriculture, including meat and milk production, produces three main greenhouse gases (GHGs): carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). In terms of climate forcing, one unit of CH 4 is equivalent to around 21 units of CO 2 and one unit of N 2 O is equivalent to 310 units of CO 2 (Forster et al., 2007). Agriculture is a major contributor to climate change, producing 14% of GHG emissions at the global level, with a further 17% attributed to land use change and deforestation. In low-income countries, the contribution of agriculture to emissions is even higher, with 20% and 50% attributed to agriculture and land use change, respectively (The World Bank, 2010). Although debate continues about the actual numbers, there is little doubt about the relative importance of agriculture, and livestock production in particular, as emitters of GHG (Anderson and Gundel, 2011;Herrero et al., 2011).Livestock systems are estimated to contribute about 50% of all agricultural sector GHG emissions (Steinfeld et al., 2006;Scherr and Sthapit, 2009), contributing up to 9% of all anthropogenic CO 2 emissions, 37-52% of CH 4 , and 65-84% of N 2 O (Smith et al., 2008;FAO, 2009). Large ruminants (cattle and buffalo) emit more GHG per kilogram of meat than monogastrics (pigs and poultry). 5 In addition to GHG from enteric fermentation and manure, large ruminants are also associated with land use changes such as deforestation (Steinfeld et al., 2006;FAO, 2009), particularly in Central and South America (Szott et al., 2000;Wassenaar et al., 2007;Barona et al., 2010;Pacheco et al., 2011). However, the direct and indirect causes of deforestation are complex and can be difficult to attribute (Geist and Lambin, 2002), and the impact of improving livestock technologies is debated (e.g., Angelsen and Kaimowitz, 2004;Kaimowitz and Angelsen 2008). For particular locations, these data require further analysis, since land use change is strongly influenced by policy interventions and the level of enforcement (Steinfeld and Gerber, 2010).Comparative analysis of GHG emissions between diverse production systems should include the environmental costs of feed production, including its transport. For example, in the case of soybean produced in the Amazon that supplies European feedlots (Herrero et al., 2009;Anderson and Gundel, 2011), transport accounts for 11-12% of GHG emissions (Garnett, 2011) and contributes more to GHGs than feed produced near feedlots in midwestern USA (Pelletier et al., 2010). Feedlot cattle produce fewer GHG emissions than foragefed cattle, mainly due to better feed conversion (Casey and Holden, 2006;Gerber et al., 2010;Pelletier et al., 2010). However, the potential to mitigate climate change and other co-benefits of forage-based systems 6 (Figure 11-1) are often not considered. It is these benefits of forage-based systems in the tropics that need to be recognized 5 Because of their relative unimportance as emitters of GHGs, we consider monogastrics further only in passing. 6 In addition to perennial pastures for grazing, forages include herbaceous and woody plants, and perennial and short-lived forage crops for cut-and-carry. We use the term \"forage-based systems\" to include all systems that include forage plants as a component, including ley systems that include several years' cropping before returning to pasture, agropastoral systems, and rangelands (native grasslands and savannas). They all contain a substantial component of animal production. by the global community. We call this concept \"LivestockPlus\".In this chapter, we discuss the role of tropical forages in mitigating climate change. We focus on forage-based production systems in which forages have a multifunctional role, in contrast to feedlotbased systems. Sown tropical forages are mostly selections from undomesticated grass and legume species but can include genetically improved varieties. In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), cattle are raised largely on sown pastures; in West Africa, cattle typically graze native pastures; in tropical Asia, cut-and-carry systems are predominant; and in Eastern, Central, and Southern Africa, both grazing native pastures and cut-and-carry systems are common. Monogastrics are fed with a diverse range of materials, particularly by smallholders where locally produced feed is important.Sown forages also have a role in many systems to enhance production efficiency and contribute to other functions such as erosion control, soil improvement, restoration of degraded lands, and improving biodiversity.Livestock are a crucial component of livelihoods and food security of nearly 1 billion people in the developing world, contributing 40% of the global value of agricultural output. Livestock contribute 15% of total food energy, 25% of dietary protein, and some micronutrients that are not available from plants. Globally, four of the five agricultural commodities with the highest economic value are livestock-related; in order of value, these are milk, rice, and meat from cattle, pigs, and poultry. East and Southeast Asia and LAC show the largest increases in consumption of livestock products between 1961and 2005(FAO, 2009)). Consumption is expected to continue to increase (Delgado et al., 1999;Herrero et al., 2009).The livestock sector is the largest user of land resources, employing 3.4 billion hectares for grazing and 0.5 billion hectares for feed crops (Steinfeld et al., 2006), 30% of the ice-free terrestrial surface, and nearly 80% of all agricultural land. The share of grazing land in the overall land area is higher in developing countries than in developed countries (FAO, 2009). There are regional differences in the types of mixed crop-livestock systems (FAO, 2009). The temperate regions of Europe, Central Asia and the Americas, and the subhumid regions of tropical Africa, LAC, the Middle East, and parts of Southeast Asia have rainfed mixed-farming systems. Globally, they produce 48% of beef, 53% of milk, and 33% of mutton. Livestock are mostly fed grass, crop residues, and crop byproducts (Herrero et al., 2010). Irrigated mixed systems in areas of high population density in East and South Asia provide about one third of the world's pork, mutton, and milk, and one fifth of its beef.Of the world's total, developing countries produce about 50% of beef, 41% of milk, 72% of mutton, 59% of pork, and 53% of poultry. Crop-livestock systems produce 50% of global cereals; on current trends, feed grain may amount to more than 40% of global cereal use by 2050, mainly utilized in industrial pig and poultry production (Herrero et al., 2009(Herrero et al., , 2010)).The demand for livestock products must be reconciled with the environmental impacts of livestock. The aim should be greater eco-efficiency, i.e., highly productive forage-based systems with a small ecological footprint that are economically sustainable and socially equitable (CIAT, 2009;Keating et al., 2010). Although tropical agriculture contributes to GHG emissions, it can also mitigate climate change by reducing emissions (abatements) and absorbing GHGs (Rosegrant et al., 2008). In the remainder of this chapter, we focus on the role of sown forages in mitigating the contribution of tropical agriculture to climate change.Productivity, profitability, and environmental impacts of land used for forages are interrelated. The extent of land degradation influences the potential of forages to mitigate climate change, because degradation reduces the potential to sequester carbon and is difficult to reverse (Lal, 2010). Heerink et al. (2001) estimate that 35% of all land in Asia, 45% in South America, 75% in Central America, and 65% in sub-Saharan Africa is in various stages of degradation, 7 largely due to overuse and overgrazing. Globally, 20% of the world's pasture and grasslands are degraded (FAO, 2009), reaching 50% in tropical Brazil (Boddey et al., 2004;Cederberg et al., 2009), up to 60% in Central America (Szott et al., 2000), and as high as 73% in dry areas (UNEP, 2004). Many tropical forages are well adapted to marginal environments (Peters et al., 2001) and have the capacity to reverse degradation and enhance soil fertility (Fisher et al., 1997;Guimarães et al., 2004;Rao et al,. 2004;Amézquita et al., 2007;Ayarza et al., 2007).There are five strategies to reduce terrestrial GHG emissions (Scherr and Sthapit, 2009):(1) carbon-rich farming; (2) farming with perennials; (3) climate-friendly livestock systems; (4) conserving and restoring habitats; and (5) restoring watersheds and degraded pastures. Sown tropical forages can contribute directly to all five strategies. In particular, forages mitigate GHG emissions in three ways: (1) by sequestering atmospheric CO 2 ; 8 (2) by reducing ruminant CH 4 emissions per unit livestock product as compared to a lower quality rangeland/degraded pasture and/or offsetting emissions via carbon sequestration; and (3) by reducing N 2 O emissions. We discuss the role of sown forages in influencing the atmospheric concentrations of each of these three important GHGs. Additionally, through their role in intensification of production systems, improved tropical forages can reduce pressure on forests by producing more output from the same unit of land and thus contribute to abating emissions. This, however, requires policies to prevent expansion beyond existing agricultural land and thus protect forests and other natural reserves.Agriculture could offset up to 20% of total global CO 2 emissions (Smith et al., 2008). Eighty-nine percent of the potential climate change mitigation of agriculture comes from terrestrial carbon sequestration, 9% from CH 4 reduction, and 2% from reduction of N 2 O emissions, although this potential has largely been ignored in climate change discussions (Smith et al., 2007a(Smith et al., , 2008;;Scherr and Sthapit, 2009). Guo and Gifford (2002) analyzed the results from 74 papers on the effects of land use changes on soil carbon stocks. While soil carbon stocks declined in conversion from pastures to plantations and from forests or pastures to crops, they increased when converting annual crops to plantations, crops to pastures, crops to secondary forest, and, interestingly, forest to pastures (Table 11-1). Powers et al. (2011) reported increases in soil carbon stock when forest or savanna was converted to pastures (5-12% and 10-22%, respectively). Most of the above-ground carbon in vegetation is lost when forests are cleared for pastures, but soil carbon stocks are often the same over the long term or can increase substantially (Amézquita et al., 2010). Studies from the tropical rainforest of the Colombian Amazon region indicate that total carbon stocks are highest in native forests, followed by wellmanaged sown pastures and silvopastoral systems, with degraded pastures and degraded soils lowest (Gobbi et al., 2008;Amézquita et al., 2010). In contrast to annual crops, well-managed pastures maintain a cover of vegetation on the soil, which reduces fluctuations in soil temperature and adds organic matter (Brown and Lugo, 1990). Pastures in areas receiving 2000-3000 mm annual rainfall have a higher potential to sequester carbon than forests under similar climatic conditions (Guo and Gifford, 2002).Improved management of crops and grassland and restoration of degraded land and organic soils offer the greatest opportunities for mitigation of GHG emissions (Smith et al., 2008). Agriculture in 2030 could potentially offset 5500-6000 million metric tons (t) of CO 2 equivalents 9 per year, although lower levels could be economically viable depending on the market prices for carbon. The mitigation potential of improved grassland and cropland management is about 1350-1450 million t CO 2 equivalents/ year each, which, together with 1350 million t CO 2 equivalents/year for restoring cultivated organic soils, and 650 million t CO 2 equivalents/ year for restoring degraded land, is about 75% of the global biophysical mitigation potential (Smith et al., 2008). Sown forages, through their effects on livestock systems and cropping systems, can contribute to this potential in all of them.Regionally, Southeast Asia, South America, and East Asia have the highest total mitigation potentials, while South America and Africa have the potential for carbon sequestration from recuperating degraded grasslands (Conant et al., 2001;Conant and Paustian, 2002). Sown pastures of Brachiaria grasses have large potential for carbon sequestration in LAC (Thornton and Herrero, 2010), with Central America having particular potential for carbon sequestration because of higher levels of land degradation (Heerinck et al., 2001). Of the overall carbon mitigation potential, 29% will be from pasture land (Lal, 2010).Forages are also key components of minimumand no-till cropping systems in Brazil (Landers, 2007) and Colombia (Sanz et al., 2004). Conversion of native grassland to agropastoral systems in the Cerrado of Brazil and the Eastern Plains of Colombia, with adequate soil and crop management, generates benefits to both agriculture and the environment (Guimarães et al., 2004;Rondón et al., 2006;Fisher, 2009;Subbarao et al., 2009). For example, in contrast to annual crop species, most tropical forages are perennials and provide a permanent soil cover and thus prevent soil surface erosion. The latter is of particular importance as erosion also results in loss of soil organic matter, which is largely oxidized, releasing CO 2 to the atmosphere (Lal, 2010).Within a given grassland ecosystem, climatic and management-related factors interact to influence GHG balance over a specified period of time (Liebig et al., 2010). Management practices that reduce carbon loss and increase carbon sequestration in European grasslands include:(1) avoiding soil tillage and the conversion of grasslands to arable use; ( 2) moderately intensifying nutrient-poor permanent grasslands;(3) using light grazing instead of heavy grazing;(4) increasing the duration of grass leys; and(5) converting grass leys to grass-legume mixtures or to permanent grasslands (Soussana et al., 2010). The mitigation potential of tropical forage plants is favored by prostrate growth habits (e.g., Brachiaria humidicola, Arachis pintoi) but a precondition is proper pasture management.Optimal grazing management can enhance accrual of soil carbon (Guo and Gifford, 2002), highlighting the importance of grassland productivity in carbon sequestration. Sown tropical forages can sequester large amounts of carbon in soil, particularly in the deeper layers (Fisher et al., 1994(Fisher et al., , 1997(Fisher et al., , 2007;;Rao, 1998). The potential of sown forages under adequate pasture and animal management to sequester carbon is second only to forest (Fisher et al., 2007;Fisher, 2009). Soil organic carbon (SOC) levels under the Colombian Eastern Plains are as high as 268 t carbon/ha in the top 80 cm of soil under a B. humidicola-Arachis pintoi pasture, with 75% of the carbon found below 20 cm (Fisher et al., 1994).Compared with the native savanna, a sown grass pasture sequestered an additional 26 t carbon/ha in 5 years, increasing 2.7-fold with an associated legume (Fisher et al., 1994). Unlike the carbon accumulated in most other systems, which is rarely deeper than 20 cm, carbon accumulated in the deeper soil layers is likely to have long residence times, even if it is not truly sequestered (i.e., it is not physically protected or chemically inert). It is also likely to be unaffected in any cropping phase that there might be in mixed crop-pasture systems (Fisher et al., 1994). Pasture in Bahia, Brazil, sequestered half as much carbon as the Colombian Eastern Plains, probably due to seasonally lower temperatures that limit net primary productivity (Fisher et al., 2007). It should be noted, however, that there is discussion in the literature on the potential of carbon sequestration of pastures and the interactions with a particular environment and intensity of degradation (e.g., Conant et al., 2001;da Silva et al., 2004).Globally, agroforestry systems show lower potential for carbon sequestration than do croplands under improved management, grazing land and livestock, and restoration of degraded lands (Smith et al., 2008). Above-ground carbon stock is usually higher in land use systems that include trees, however, and planting trees may also increase soil carbon sequestration (Smith et al., 2007b). We suggest that the inclusion of trees in agroforestry and agrosilvopastoral systems could further enhance the overall efficiency of crop-livestock systems (Fujisaka et al., 1998; see also Chapter 4 of this volume).It is expensive to measure carbon sequestration in soil with the current methods of soil sampling, hence simple indicators (proxies) are needed to allow for transparent consolidation over larger areas (Fisher, 2009). FAO has developed an ex-ante carbon calculator (Bernoux et al., 2010;FAO, 2010b), which shows promise. The carbon calculator assumes that renovated pastures would increase soil carbon stock by 17% in natural pastures, 21% in moderately degraded pastures, and 67% in severely degraded pastures. Based on this, and assuming that there are 78 million hectares of moderately degraded sown pastures in Brazil, renovating them with improved and highly productive sown forages would sequester on average 146 million t CO 2 equivalents/year over a period of 14 years (S. Graefe and G. Hyman, unpublished data). This is equivalents to 18.6 years of current emissions of diesel vehicles in Brazil.Emissions of CH 4 from enteric fermentation in ruminants account for 25% of GHG emissions from livestock (Thornton and Herrero, 2010) (Table 11-2), and is the largest single-source agricultural emission. Although there are differences among regions and production systems (Herrero et al., 2008), increasing animal productivity per unit of CH 4 emitted can be a viable strategy for reducing GHG emissions from livestock production. Diets with high digestibility and high energy and high protein concentrations produce less CH 4 per unit of livestock product. Improving these characteristics in forages could reduce CH 4 emissions from beef production by 15-30% (Gurian-Sherman, 2011). Legumes contain less structural carbohydrates and more condensed tannins than does grass, and adding legumes to the diet can further reduce CH 4 emissions per unit of meat or milk produced (Woodward et al., 2004;Waghorn and Clark 2004). In addition to reducing GHG emissions, intensification of animal production using highyielding sown forages requires fewer animals for the same output, and reduces pressure on land and water resources if managed appropriately (LivestockPlus). Feeding crop residues and byproducts is also an option to reduce GHG. The use of this highly digestible crop \"waste\" has a greater impact on both CH 4 and CO 2 emissions than grain supplements (Thornton and Herrero, 2010). Integrating tropical forages with crops can enhance soil fertility as well as the quality and quantity of crop residues, giving higher system efficiency (Ayarza et al., 2007). There are trade-offs between crop and livestock production, however, such as using forages either as animal feed or as green manure (Douxchamps et al., 2012).Emissions of CH 4 can be reduced by dietary additives (Smith et al., 2008), including oils (Henry and Eckard, 2009), feeding silage instead of hay (Benchaar et al., 2001), and by manipulating the rumen flora (Henry and Eckard, 2009). While legumes can help to reduce GHG production, there are trade-offs. Condensed tannins from legumes can reduce CH 4 production in ruminants (Woodward et al., 2001), but they often also reduce animal performance mostly by reducing feed digestibility (Woodward et al., 2001;Waghorn et al., 2002;Tavendale et al., 2005;Tiemann et al., 2008). Condensed tannins in tropical legumes are highly reactive and are variable in quantity and quality, which remains a challenge to their use to reduce CH 4 production by ruminants. If a tropical species with the typically good agronomic performance on poor soils of tanniniferous shrub legumes, combined with a reduction of ruminal CH 4 production without inhibiting forage digestibility and protein availability (as found for some temperate Lotus species), were to be identified, it could have large beneficial impact on climate-friendly livestock production.While tro pospheric OH (hydroxyl radical) is the largest sink, aerobic soils are the second largest global sink for tropospheric CH 4 , removing methane equal to 10-15% of global emissions (Reeburgh et al., 1993;IPCC, 1995). In a comparison of arable land with woodland and grassland, the methane oxidation rate of grassland was about 10 times that of arable land and equal to that of woodland in temperate conditions (Willison et al., 1997). Especially during the dry season, abandoned tropical pastures are strong sinks of CH 4 , consuming even more than secondary and some primary forests. This general ability depends largely on grazing management and is inhibited, for example, if gas diffusion is restricted by soil compaction through trampling (Mosier et al., 2004), so that the potential of pastures as CH 4 sinks must take account of the livestock production system under consideration.Nitrification is a key process in the global nitrogen cycle. It generates nitrate through microbial activity and is primarily responsible for the loss of soil and applied nitrogen via leaching and denitrification (Subbarao et al., 2006). In agricultural systems, 1978). Nearly 17 million t of nitrogen is currently emitted to the atmosphere as N 2 O each year (Galloway et al., 2008;Schlesinger, 2009). By 2100, global N 2 O emissions are projected to be four times the current level, due largely to increasing use of nitrogen fertilizers (Galloway et al., 2008;Burney et al., 2010;Kahrl et al., 2010). Up to 70% of the nitrogen applied as fertilizer in intensive cereal-production systems is lost following rapid nitrification (Raun and Johnson, 1999). Controlling nitrification in agricultural systems is thus critical to reduce both N 2 O emissions and nitrate contamination of water bodies (Subbarao et al., 2012).Tropical forages, in particular Brachiaria spp., suppress activity of nitrifying bacteria by releasing inhibitors from roots and therefore reduce soil nitrification (Sylvester-Bradley et al., 1988;Subbarao et al., 2009) in a process called biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) (Subbarao et al., 2007(Subbarao et al., , 2009)). There is a wide range in the BNI ability of the root systems of tropical forage grasses and cereal and legume crops (Subbarao et al., 2007). Brachiaria humidicola and B. decumbens, both of which are well adapted to the low-nitrogen soils of South American savannas (Miles et al., 2004), showed the greatest BNI-capacity among the tropical grasses tested (Subbarao et al., 2007). In contrast, the major cereals (rice, wheat, and maize) have little BNI capacity (Subbarao et al., 2007). The major nitrification inhibitor in Brachiaria forage grasses is brachialactone, a cyclic diterpene (Subbarao et al., 2009).Brachiaria humidicola also has substantial genotypic variation for BNI. The ongoing Brachiaria breeding program at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), conducted in collaboration with the Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), plans to identify genetic markers associated with BNI ability in crosses between apomictic and sexual accessions of B. humidicola. Field studies in CIAT headquarters (Cali, Colombia), on a Mollisol, indicated a 90% decrease in the oxidation rates of soil NH 4 + in B. humidicola plots, largely due to low nitrifier populations. N 2 O emissions were also suppressed by more than 90% in field plots with B. humidicola compared with the emissions from plots planted to soybean, which lacks BNI ability (Figure 11-2). Grasses with greater BNI ability in their roots emitted proportionally less N 2 O in a field experiment over 3 years (Subbarao et al., 2009). Tropical forage grasses with high BNI ability and perennial growth habit favor the accumulation of sufficient inhibitors to suppress soil bacterial nitrifier activity. The pasture component in an agropastoral rotational system could provide the required BNI-activity to improve the nitrogen-economy of annual crops that follow the pasture phase. For example, Brachiaria pastures that have high BNI ability could be rotated with annual crops such as maize or upland rice, which have low or very low BNI ability but receive substantial nitrogen fertilizer. The inhibitors accumulated in the soil in the pasture phase would increase the recovery of applied fertilizer nitrogen, which could lead to improvement in the overall nitrogen economy of the system (Subbarao et al., 2012).Potential differences in N 2 O emissions exist among plant species in general and among pasture plants in particular (Subbarao et al., 2009). These differences are not considered by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in their estimates of projected N 2 O emissions from agricultural systems (Stehfest and Bouwman, 2006). For example, there are more than 250 million hectares of South American savannas occupied by native grasses or by sown grasses such as Brachiaria spp. (Fisher et al., 1994) that have moderate to high BNI ability; these areas emit markedly lower amounts of N 2 O than if they were planted to field crops. If a substantial area of these savannas were to be converted to soybean and maize, which lack BNI ability, there would be profound implications for N 2 O emissions (Subbarao et al., 2009). The impact of such a conversion could be reduced if an adequate BNI ability were to be incorporated into the system, such as by integrating a high-BNI pasture phase into the system (Ayarza et al., 2007). These systems, however, must remain highly productive to meet the ever increasing demands for food from a growing world population, a challenging task for researchers, policy makers, and farmers alike.Animal urine and manure are also major sources of N 2 O. One way in which N 2 O emissions from urine may be reduced is by increasing the content of hippuric acid in the urine, as demonstrated in laboratory trials (Bertram et al., 2009). The effect could not, however, be replicated in the field (Clough et al., 2009). Phenolic compounds of tropical forages can cause a shift in the nitrogen excretion in urine towards hippuric acid (Lowry et al., 1993). Grazing management may also affect N 2 O emissions from pasture; for example, in Inner-Mongolia, increasing stocking rates of sheep reduced N 2 O emissions compared with those from ungrazed pasture (Wolf et al., 2010). However, there are no comparable data from the tropics, an obvious research gap.Microbes such as methanogenic archeae, methanotrophs, nitrifiers, and denitrifiers are important in both the formation and the oxidation of GHGs in natural and agricultural systems. These microbes interact closely, especially in the soil, and possibly also in the rumen (Mitsumori et al., 2002;Kajikawa et al., 2003). It is therefore possible that nitrification inhibition might also inhibit the desirable oxidation of methane in soils (Bronson and Mosier, 1994); as demonstrated by Yue et al. (2005). A possible explanation is that some methanotrophs produce nitrous oxide (Lee et al., 2009) through various biochemical pathways (Powlson et al., 1997). Because of the radiative forcing difference between CH 4 and N 2 O (Forster et al., 2007), reciprocal effects should always be considered and studied in a holistic mitigation concept.Land use change and leakage (i.e., the effects of reducing an activity in one location but increasing it in another) affect the contribution of agriculture to GHG emissions and strategies are needed to mitigate these. Wassenaar et al. (2007), using a novel approach to project the spatial trends of deforestation for the neotropics from 2000 to 2010, concluded that livestock production causes deforestation, since it is the main land use after clearing the forest. They also concluded that livestock production is to some extent responsible for the expansion of cropland into forest. Using the Amazon region as an example, however, the intensification of pastures using sown forages could just as well reduce deforestation by reducing pressure on land through increased efficiency of livestock production (higher livestock output per unit of land). But higher efficiency also increases the productivity of livestock operations, which could prompt further deforestation (White et al., 1999;Kaimowitz and Angelsen, 2008). Pasture establishment is also often used in conjunction with expansion of soybean production (i.e., a pasture phase employed after deforestation, which then is succeeded by soybean cultivation) further increasing pressure on forests (Hecht, 2005). In summary, it is not clear what effect the intensification of livestock production based on improved forages would have on deforestation, and any effects would also depend on policy interventions (e.g., White et al., 1999;Steinfeld and Gerber, 2010).Life-cycle analysis (LCA) has been used recently to analyze the implications of system intensification for GHG emissions. To assess the net abatement potential of each strategy, it must be subjected to whole-farm systems modeling and a full LCA, to ensure that a reduction in emissions at one point does not stimulate higher emissions elsewhere in the production system (Eckard et al., 2010). Peters et al. (2010) and Pelletier et al. (2010) have discussed the case for reducing emissions through systems with higher feed-conversion efficiency such as feedlots. Most studies assess emissions only (Cederberg et al., 2009;Gerber et al., 2010;Peters et al., 2010), however, and do not consider the positive effects of mechanisms such as carbon sequestration and BNI from pastures. Similarly, the majority of GHG balances assume equilibrium conditions in SOC in established systems (Pelletier et al., 2010).Increasing the digestibility of cattle rations by feeding grains and whole-plant silage from maize does mitigate CH 4 emissions, but the loss of SOC and the loss of carbon sequestration potential caused by plowing grassland to grow maize are much larger than the mitigation obtained by feeding more maize (Vellinga and Hoving, 2011). A sensitivity analysis in the USA that compared the total GHG balance in intensified grazing systems, including SOC sequestration, with that of feedlot-finished beef found that pasture-fed beef produced 15% less net GHG (Pelletier et al., 2010). This supports our analysis of the mitigation potential of forages through carbon sequestration outlined above.Where the positive and negative impacts of technology on land use are closely related, and in view of the global implications (Foley et al., 2005), it is useful that technology options be combined with decision-support tools. The aim is to foster policies with a minimum ecological footprint, such as the conservation of forests (Szott et al., 2000;Neidhardt and Campos-Monteros, 2009), to reduce land degradation and to maintain vital ecosystem services. Avoiding land clearance in the Amazon, Central America, and the Caribbean regions could save GHG emissions of 1.8 billion t CO 2 equivalents/year (Vosti et al., 2011). Increasing the eco-efficiency 10 of agriculture in these regions, in which land is often degraded, may have the largest effect on mitigation of GHGs, through the combined effects of avoiding deforestation and realizing the land's mitigation potential.Options to mitigate agricultural GHGs are cost competitive with options to mitigate GHGs from other sources such as energy, transportation, and forestry (Smith et al., 2007a). However, these options have not received adequate attention in the climate change negotiations. Benefit schemes are difficult to implement in terms of accurate measurements of emissions and uptakes, and the definition of appropriate and equitable funding schemes. Curbing deforestation, reforestation, and payments for improved carbon management are among the most promising strategies (Stern, 2006). Important elements in agriculture include management of rice paddy, reduced tillage, perennial land covers, restoration of degraded lands, and improved livestock and manure management (Scherr and Sthapit, 2009;The World Bank, 2010). Selecting or breeding a new generation of crops and forages that will reduce GHG emissions is a paradigm shift in agriculture that offers the possibility of securing crop and livestock productivity while at the same time moderating the effect of agriculture on climate change (Kell, 2011;Philippot and Hallin, 2011). The barriers to realizing the mitigation potential of agriculture include: (1) lack of permanence of sequestered carbon; (2) the requirement for additionality, i.e., the net reduction of GHG emissions should be supplemental to ongoing activities; (3) uncertainty, in terms of the complex biological and ecological processes and seasonal/ annual variability; and (4) leakage, discussed above (Smith et al., 2007b).Further biophysical research is needed to assess the mitigation potential of tropical forages in crop-livestock systems (including other interventions such as including trees in the production system, and crop management). This needs to be combined with assessment of economic feasibility of mitigation options and socio-economic modeling to target policy support. Another level of complexity is the assessment of co-benefits, especially win-win situations. For example: (1) Increased SOC enhances soil quality and pasture productivity, which frees other areas for alternative production and conservation, although explicit policy regulation may be needed to avoid negative outcomes such as deforestation; (2) Reduced soil nitrification of sown pastures with high BNI capacity can improve the recovery of applied nitrogen by subsequent cereal crops in agropastoral systems; and (3) Increased belowand above-ground biodiversity has both landscape and sociocultural implications (Smith et al., 2007b;Herrero et al., 2009;Anderson and Gundel, 2011). Linking complementary farming systems in space and time, particularly specialist crop and livestock farms, for nutrient and, to a lesser extent, feed exchanges, also increases eco-efficiency in land management (Wilkins, 2008).It is expensive to measure soil carbon sequestration and CH 4 and N 2 O balances over broad areas. We need tools that allow us to estimate GHG fluxes accurately, supported by cost-effective measurements and modeling techniques (The World Bank, 2010). Promising approaches include satellite imaging, combined with airborne light detection and ranging and field plots for carbon assessment (Asner et al., 2010), together with methods such as the FAO Ex Ante Appraisal Carbon-balance Tool (EX-ACT) (Bernoux et al., 2010;Branca and Medeiros, 2010), but they need further development before they can be applied widely. We also need methodologies to assess the opportunity costs of land use change for smallholders to evaluate the impacts of management options on both livelihoods and the environment (White and Minang, 2010). The global climate change community has not yet broadly addressed N 2 O emissions, but they need to be included in the future in schemes to mitigate GHG emissions (Smith et al., 2007b).Because of their national, regional, and global mitigation potential, all forage-based systems (grasslands and pastures as well as forage production on croplands) should be included as potential components in negotiations of GHG emissions. If the mitigation potential of agriculture is to be realized, it should be included in schemes such as reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD), the clean development mechanism (CDM), and expanded REDD schemes such as carbon in agriculture, forestry, and other land uses. If the cost of establishing forage-based systems and agroforestry systems, for instance, could be met through payment for environmental services (PES) via REDD program financing, we could anticipate a triple-win situation combining social, economic, and environmental benefits. Direct-cost recovery with minimum time lags in the payment scheme is a critical requirement for smallholders with limited resources and in risky production environments (The World Bank, 2010).Market differentiation and price premiums would be feasible by combining direct payment with certification for climate-smart forage-based systems such as livestock and crop production based on improved forages and better utilization of crop residues. If so, higher returns to smallholder farmers would be possible, providing both improved equity and mitigation of GHG emissions. It is essential, however, that national agricultural policies are aligned with global environmental objectives (Steinfeld and Gerber, 2010).Livestock production is a large source of GHG emissions, and reducing meat consumption or changing from ruminant to non-ruminant meat could have a number of environmental benefits (Stehfest et al., 2009;Wirsenius et al., 2010). However, in many publications, analysis is restricted to the emissions from livestock production without mentioning compensating factors such as potential for carbon sequestration and reducing N 2 O emissions. For example, Wirsenius et al. (2010) suggest substituting beef with pork and poultry, due to their higher feed conversion efficiency. We argue, however, that comparing GHG emissions from livestock production in the tropics with other systems must be based on LCA analysis and that the potential contribution of forages to mitigation must be taken into account. Assessments of grain-based feedlots must account for the whole GHG cost of the feed supplied and take into account that forages are often produced on land less suitable for crop production (Schultze- Kraft and Peters, 1997;Peters et al., 2001). As we describe here, improved grassland management and intensification of forage-based systems (through improved resource use efficiency, improved carbon sequestration, and reduced emissions due to BNI) are key to mitigating GHG emissions from livestock production, and will deliver other co-benefits such as resource conservation, reduced costs, and social and cultural benefits.Due to the importance of forage-based systems, including feed production on cropland, we argue that the international community should give much greater attention to systems based on sown forages. At least 70% of agricultural land is covered by these systems and they impact GHG emissions, resource use efficiency, and resource degradation. Sown forages have substantial potential for carbon sequestration and for reducing CH 4 and N 2 O emissions per unit livestock produced. Because of their multipurpose role (feed, green manure, soil improvement, erosion control, and biodiversity), sown-foragebased systems may be among the most promising means of mitigating the impacts of agriculture on GHG emissions (Smith et al., 2008). We estimate that sown forages alone could contribute 60-80% of the total potential carbon sequestration on agricultural lands through their contribution to the management of crop and grazing land and to the restoration of degraded lands and cultivated organic soils. IPCC (2007) reports that improving management of grazing land has the greatest mitigation potential of all agricultural interventions, over 1.5 billion t CO 2 equivalents/year, sufficient to offset all the emissions from livestock production. In view of the extent of pasture areas and the dominance of crop-livestock systems in land use, we suggest that no strategy for mitigating global climate change can be comprehensive or successful if it fails to recognize the importance of forage-based systems. Sown forages can also be integrated into agroforestry systems to enhance their eco-efficiency, not only to mitigate GHG emissions but to optimize resource use equitably and profitably.Reduced consumption of animal products may be desirable in rich countries, but from a nutritional and sociocultural standpoint is probably not an option for countries where consumption is currently low (Herrero et al., 2009;Steinfeld and Gerber, 2010;Anderson and Gundel, 2011). Failing to take advantage of the mitigation potential of sown forages may leave 50 -80% of the mitigation potential of agriculture untapped. It is therefore essential to: (1) further increase knowledge about the quantitative contribution of different processes such as carbon sequestration, BNI, reduced GHG emissions per unit of livestock produced, and co-benefits in terms of resource use efficiency (e.g., land, water, and nutrients);(2) refine comprehensive assessment of complex systems by using approaches such as LCA;(3) integrate these results into more manageable monitoring systems using proxies (parameters representative of the actual situation that can be collected at relatively low financial and time cost to allow for regular revisions); (4) develop policy and financial incentives for livestock and crop producers via direct PES, e.g., to enhance efficiency of crop-livestock systems through prefinancing planting of improved forages and establishing agroforestry systems; and (5) provide additional market incentives for producers/ farming communities through certification of climate-and resource-friendly livestock production.The majority of GHG emissions originate in the 151 non-Annex 1 countries (less industrialized countries without binding Kyoto Protocol obligations to reduce emissions) where growth of livestock production is expected to be particularly high (Gerber et al., 2010). It is essential to develop a climate policy framework that provides incentives for these countries to participate (Gerber et al., 2010;Anderson and Gundel, 2011). To address issues of leakage, incentives need to be accompanied by policy regulations to avoid deforestation and conversion of fragile lands into croplands.Further research to enhance eco-efficiency of agricultural systems should focus on the following actions to realize the potential of sown tropical forages to mitigate GHG emissions: In summary, we consider that well-managed tropical forage-based systems can contribute not only to improved livelihoods of the rural poor in the tropics, but also to the overall quality of the environment. With a global community increasingly cognizant of the environmental implications of agriculture, forage-based systems should figure prominently in future innovative agricultural systems. We hope that this paper stimulates intensive discussion that leads to further investment from donors for research on improving eco-efficiency of forage-based livestock production in the tropics.This chapter highlights the importance of fruits and vegetables in combating world malnutrition. We examine the major constraints to production and consumption in the developing world, and various eco-efficient approaches to enhancing production efficiency and produce quality and safety. We stress the value of improved, resilient germplasm, safer pest and disease management practices, more appropriate water and soil fertility management, and ways in which technology dissemination might be made more effective. The chapter includes examples of eco-efficient interventions in production of fruits and vegetables, the risks of such interventions and opportunities to enhance their impact, and key lessons for research, development, and policy.Fruits and vegetables are highly nutrient dense. They contain vitamins, fiber, minerals, antioxidants, and other micronutrients essential for human health, and thus are excellent food sources to combat malnutrition. Micronutrient malnutrition, resulting from an imbalanced diet, is prevalent globally regardless of age, location, or income category, and is often the main cause of various debilitating chronic and fatal diseases. While 925 million people currently suffer from hunger, approximately 1.6 billion are malnourished (FAO, 2010;WHO, 2011). This high prevalence of micronutrient malnutrition is mainly the result of an insufficient intake of vitamins and minerals (WHO and FAO, 2006). Among the poor, the cause of malnutrition can be linked directly to their limited access to adequate amounts of appropriate food to satisfy their nutritional requirements for good health. Examples of the effects of malnutrition that are common in developing countries include maternal mortality and premature birth caused by iron deficiency; and night blindness and an impaired immune system caused by insufficient vitamin A. Being malnourished does not necessarily mean hungry, as a result of consuming excess carbohydrates and fats, thus bringing the accompanying medical effects of high body mass index. In the developed world, malnutrition can be attributed to an unwise diet choice and a pronounced tendency to consume an excessive amount of fats, carbohydrates, and protein. Obesity (which often leads to diabetes) and consequent cardiovascular and other chronic diseases are the prime silent manifestations of malnutrition caused by inappropriate consumption, in both developing and developed countries. The resulting cost to national health services is very large and growing steadily.More investment is needed to increase availability and consumption of fruits and vegetables worldwide if we are to both feed the world and also nourish its population to the level needed to assure good health, and thus deliver improved livelihoods. Under-consumption of fruits and vegetables is among the top 10 risk factors leading to micronutrient malnutrition and is associated with the prevalence of chronic noncommunicable diseases (Ezzati et al., 2002). Noncommunicable diseases such as hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, and obesity may be the causes of a high proportion of untimely deaths, for example, in some African countries (Ganry, 2011). In these countries, the availability of fruits and vegetables is often far below the intake of 400 g/day per capita recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Currently the agricultural research community's main goal is to increase production of grains and other staple crops to feed a growing world population. However, for a development strategy to be effective and sustainable, it is necessary to ensure that both food and nutritional security are delivered simultaneously and at the same time the environment and enterprises in which production occurs are not chronically degraded.Fruits and vegetables can also fight hunger, malnutrition, and environmental degradation indirectly. Their high market value contributes to generating income through direct sales and added value, thus alleviating rural poverty and providing additional opportunities to purchase nutritious foods. Profitable fruit and vegetable production systems can take place even in smallholdings (due to limited economies of scale). Some of these crops can be grown with relatively low capital investment (Shackleton et al., 2009). Even with restricted but judicious inputs there can be quick returns to investment for the poor in both rural and urban areas. Moreover, investing in suitable inputs to prevent mining of soil nutrients and adoption of better land management practices have the potential to be extremely environmentally beneficial within a resource-poor farmer context. Fruit and vegetable production tends to be labor intensive and therefore provides employment and generates income across the community; it also empowers women, who often have a major role in fruit and vegetable value chains. Indigenous fruits and vegetables are regularly sold in local markets and, in some cases, can achieve a sufficient level of quality and consumer acceptance to permit commercial cultivation by smallholder farmers.Enhanced per-capita consumption of fruits and vegetables among all sectors of society would help fight malnutrition and poverty along the value chain from the field to the table. Fruit and vegetable enterprises need to ensure availability and affordability for consumers to maximize the benefits for both consumers and producers. Producers in developing countries have to overcome various constraints in sustaining sufficient product availability. These constraints include: lack of access to improved, superiorquality seeds; limited knowledge of effective production practices, particularly with regards to using available water resources efficiently; and ensuring that soil health is not compromised by either nutrient mining or excessive use of fertilizer. In addition, ineffective and harmful pest and disease management practices may threaten not just the profitability of the farm enterprises but the very health of farmers, families, consumers, and the surrounding environment.Climate uncertainty, manifested by unpredictable, harsh weather events, has exacerbated the constraints that smallholder farmers face. This includes increased pest and disease pressure, and the resulting challenge of producing residue-and contaminant-free products. In the case of fruit growers, for instance, increases in relative humidity that occur as a result of unpredictable rain near harvest carry the risk of fungal infections that become evident only after the fruit is sold to the markets. Temperature fluctuations are increasingly accompanied by changes of population dynamics in both pollinators and insect pests. For example, increases in temperatures have meant that insects such as the fruit fly (Anastrepha fraterculus) are now found where they were normally absent, such as areas where Andean blackberry (Rubus glaucus) is cultivated. Events like these have caught growers off guard and have resulted in loads of fruit being rejected at processing facilities (A. González 2010, pers. comm.). Unexpected rains may cause temporary flooding, which can have disastrous effects on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and many other crops.Most vegetables and some annual fruit species are particularly susceptible to drought, even when experienced for very short periods of time. Drought is especially challenging in highland landscapes, where irrigation is usually not available. Even with the use of irrigation, however, unexpected lack of water will cause severe losses.There are many opportunities for growing underutilized or indigenous fruit and vegetable species, which are often less susceptible to climatic events than introduced species. Unfortunately, historically there has been very little investment in research on the physiology and other attributes of these species despite the fact that they provide very tangible alternatives to the more widely grown crops in improving nutrition and income for the rural poor.As described in Chapter 2, eco-efficient agriculture aims to increase productivity while reducing associated negative environmental impacts. It must be profitable, competitive, sustainable, and resilient while meeting the economic, social, and environmental needs of the rural and urban poor. Producing enough food to assure both food and nutritional security for the global population while preserving or enhancing the environment and minimizing health risks requires more efficient and ecologically friendly production systems.An eco-efficient approach can be pursued and applied at each step, from seed production to postharvest value addition. These approaches could include ecologically appropriate practices in seed production and in the seedling nursery, utilization of cover crops that enhance mulching and fertilizer effectiveness, more efficient irrigation systems, pest and disease management techniques of low ecological risk, diversification of production systems, and efficient preharvest and postharvest management methods. The following sections describe some examples of eco-efficient production practices. Their practical application and research results are described in the case studies section.Improved, superior lines of fruits and vegetables are one affordable tool that smallholder horticultural producers can use to address the ever-increasing challenges of biotic and abiotic stresses linked to climatic changes (de la Peña and Hughes, 2007). Many wild relatives of cultivated varieties possess genes that make them more adaptable and tolerant to harsher environments in which they can thrive. For example, S. chilense, a wild relative of the cultivated tomato, is indigenous to the desert areas of northern Chile and is adapted to extreme aridity, soil salinity, and to low temperatures (Chetelat et al., 2009). Two wild nightshade species from the same region (S. sitiens and S. lycopersicoides) share such traits. Gene transfer from these wild species could facilitate the development of drought-and salt-tolerant traits in standard tomato varieties. The genetic factors that are responsible for these traits have been identified and efforts are being made to transfer them into cultivated tomato by hybridization and introgression.Unfortunately, the search for tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress is occurring mainly in highly commercial vegetables and temperate fruit species. The underutilized species, which are consumed and marketed by many families in developing countries, remain very much understudied and are at risk of being lost to deforestation and land use changes (Keatinge et al., 2010). Many indigenous vegetable species, such as amaranth (Amaranthus spp.), kangkong (Ipomoea aquatica), and Malabar spinach (Basella alba), are infested by very few pests and infected by only a few diseases. Thus they can thrive with very limited external production inputs. However, in the case of some of the underutilized fruit species, such as the Andean fruit species naranjilla or lulo (S. quitoense), resistance to biotic stresses (e.g., nematodes and root rot) has not been found. Naranjilla is economically important to smallholders in several Latin American countries, but is highly susceptible to many pests and diseases. A closely related species, S. hirtum, has fruits that are not appealing to consumers but has shown resistance to the main root nematode pest, Meloidogyne incognita. Solanum hirtum was used in hybridization programs in Colombia and a tri-hybrid variety has been released out of this cross (Bernal et al., 1998).Given the large potential diversity of fruits and vegetables, cultivation of traditional species adapted to different agroecological environments offers an opportunity to improve production and increase incomes for smallholders. Increased production and utilization of these traditional species need to be promoted. Expansion of the current cultivated crop range with indigenous species would not only enhance the resilience of these crop production systems but increase the diversity of fruits and vegetables available to consumers.The search for genes controlling those characteristics that can facilitate adaptation to changing ecological and climatic conditions is becoming urgent. Consequently, efforts to collect, conserve, and utilize genetic diversity are assuming critical importance. Collections of fruit and vegetable germplasm are important reserves of genes to confer pest and disease resistance, tolerance to flooding, improved nutritional content, longer shelf life, better yield and market quality, and other desirable traits. For example, screening of accessions from the genebank of the AVDRC -The World Vegetable Center has resulted in the identification of pepper (Capsicum annuum) lines tolerant to anthracnose (Colletotricum acutatum), cucumber lines resistant to powdery mildew (Podophaera xanthii), and pepper lines with resistance to aphids (Myzus persicae) and broad mites (Polyphagotarsonemus latus), among others.Unfortunately, no such intensive and targeted institutional efforts have taken place to search for genes of interest in tropical fruit collections. Efforts to conserve genetic resources of tropical fruits, if they exist within a country, tend to be diffused between the national research organizations, local universities, and local farmers. Screening of germplasm of Andean blackberry from the national collection held at the Colombian Corporation of Agricultural Research (Corpoica), resulted in identification of accessions tolerant to anthracnose (Kafuri, 2011). Many other examples of evaluation of national collections have shown that efforts should be devoted to characterizing existing collections rather than further collecting. There is a risk that valuable genes could be lost if the collections are not well maintained, and the collections may not represent the full genetic variability of the species.Horticultural production systems in the tropics and subtropics are often strongly affected by pests and diseases. As a result, sustainable production is not easily attainable without proper management strategies. Unfortunately, the majority of smallholder producers in developing countries have only limited access to technologies, information, financial resources, and professional services to deal with pest and disease problems. The pressure to maintain high levels of production pushes them towards misuse and/or overuse of pesticides. Some work among fruit and vegetable producers has shown that farmers often rely on calendar-based pesticide applications, often using mixtures of products and without a clear underlying rationale for their use. A study conducted by a non-governmental organization (NGO) in India showed that out of five internationally banned pesticides, four were found to be commonly in use or being tested on vegetables and fruits in New Delhi (Garg, 2011). In a participatory survey among passion fruit growers in Colombia, 47% of growers interviewed applied a mixture of pesticides up to four times a month rather than basing their applications on a damage threshold (Romero and González, 2010).Although larger enterprises often have some access to technologies and professional services that permit them to be more judicious in the chemicals and application rates used, this is not always the case. While large-scale producers may have better capacity to maintain the yields of their production systems, the pressure to satisfy the preferences of higher-end consumers for unblemished produce may still encourage them to overuse crop protection agrochemicals to assure market acceptability. When combined with inappropriate pesticide applications prior to harvest, this excessive use of inputs can result in considerable levels of harmful residues in the harvested produce. These residues have the potential to offset the nutritional benefits of vegetables and fruits. Not only does pesticide misuse affect consumers' health, it can also be hazardous to the health of farm workers if protective measures are not taken during application, which is often the case in developing countries. Overuse of agrochemicals can also dramatically increase production costs, eroding smallholder farmers' profits and thus their ability to create sustainable enterprises. The health of consumers and producers must not be jeopardized by harmful agricultural practices used to produce nutrient-laden fruits and vegetables.Studies show variable concentrations of chemical residues on and in fruits and vegetables. For example, 21 pesticide residues were detected in the cabbage samples at the farm-gate in Cape Coast, Ghana (Armah, 2011). Out of those, two were at exceedingly high levels (allenthrin at 9.57 mg/kg and phorate at 2.08 mg/kg) and three were potentially carcinogenic compounds although at toxicologically acceptable levels (cypermethrin at 0.31 mg/kg, permethrin at 0.15 mg/kg and parathion at 0.019 mg/kg). In Germany, the Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL)-management authority for health-related consumer protection-reported that out of 65% passion fruit samples containing pesticides residues, 35% were above the acceptable levels (BVL, 2008). When pesticides are used appropriately, their residues in harvested crops are below maximum residue levels (MRLs)-the maximum concentrations legally permitted in or on food commodities entering a country-and the crops are considered to be toxicologically acceptable. Bayoumi et al. (2006) compared chemical residues in cucumbers sprayed only once, as recommended by the product label, with those on cucumbers that received numerous applications, following the growers' practices. The results indicated that the numerous applications resulted in pesticide residues above the MRLs. Measurement of pesticide residues is mandatory only for fruits and vegetables exported from their country of origin, in order to comply with importing country regulations. However, having little or no pesticides in fruits and vegetables is equally important for domestic consumers.The ability of fruit and vegetable cropping systems in developing countries to tolerate, and adapt to, climate uncertainty will undoubtedly determine their viability in the future (FAO, 2001). Researchers are developing technologies to help smallholder farms and farmers be more resilient to the increasing frequency and intensity of biotic and abiotic stresses associated with climate change. As smallholder farmers are usually resource limited, these technologies must be affordable, simple to use, and accessible. Integrated pest and disease management (IPM) is one environmentally sound approach to manage biotic stresses in fruit and vegetable production systems. IPM practices enhance the role of natural enemies, of plant defense systems, and of environmental factors to reduce pest and disease incidence in a sustainable way. Should chemical inputs be deemed necessary, the selection of appropriate chemicals and the dosage and frequency at which they are applied must be done with careful consideration for the safety of the environment and human health, and to minimize negative impacts on the various interacting pest and disease management components. IPM not only provides a safer method to manage pests and diseases but also often reduces input costs due to the more judicious use of pesticides.Informed soil and water management is an essential feature of eco-efficient systems. Failure to address such issues in a timely fashion will surely compromise system sustainability. Microirrigation systems, such as drip irrigation, can increase crop productivity per unit of water used compared with less-efficient irrigation systems, and are now affordable for poor farmers. In many arid or semi-arid locations, such systems are the only solution, simply because there is too little water available to use less-efficient systems. Nevertheless, many smallholder farmers are still unfamiliar with the concept and practicality of micro-irrigation techniques. Access to these technologies in some areas is still fairly limited, making it even harder to adopt and, where necessary, to adjust the technology to meet local, specific requirements.Because drip irrigation avoids prolonged direct contact between the water and the upper part of the plants, it may also minimize the spread of soil-borne microbial contamination to fruits and leafy vegetables. Using the same logic, use of grey water for irrigation may be safer when applied using micro-irrigation methods. However, recent occurrences of contaminated vegetables in Europe are putting these practices under the spotlight. Authorities and farmers should be aware of the danger of biological contamination in irrigation systems. Irrigation water runoff, which may contaminate groundwater and other water resources with fertilizer and pesticide residues, is also minimized in production systems using micro-irrigation.Smallholder fruit producers currently use multi-strata and multi-species production systems to boost water productivity. However, while the farmers have built on traditional knowledge, their production systems have been devised with very little technical information or access to new technologies. Research is needed to provide more-sound alternative production practices, such as the growing and incorporation of cover crops that can help boost water-holding capacity in fruit orchards as well as contribute to soil fertility and structure, which helps the main crop withstand climate extremes. These alternative production practices need research and validation and could prove very useful to reduce herbicide application, ensure soil water retention, mitigate the effects of short-term droughts, and control erosion in high rainfall areas. However, when selecting cover crops, farmers need to consider carefully the cover crops' effect on insect diversity, as this could increase the number of crop pests. Conversely, the cover crop selected could be beneficial to the biological control agents of the insect pests (Wood et al., 2011).In some vegetable species, the issues of flooding and the presence of soil-borne diseases may be addressed by using grafting. This practice has been used for centuries in temperate fruit production, and is becoming more prevalent in some tropical and subtropical fruits, e.g., avocado, citrus (Citrus spp.), mango, and soursop (Annona muricata). The scion (upper part) of superior cultivated crop plants can be grafted to rootstocks of plants with important characteristics such as resistance to flooding and/or certain soil-borne plant diseases. Grafting tomato or pepper varieties to bacterial-wilt-tolerant eggplant rootstocks can drastically reduce the incidence of the wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Floodtolerant eggplant rootstocks also enable farmers to produce tomatoes during rainy seasons in the tropics, ensuring production and availability of the crop all year round. Ralstonia solanacearum is also the causal agent of moko disease, which is responsible for severe losses in plantain in Latin America and the Caribbean. Unfortunately, no grafting is possible in monocotyledonous species like banana or plantain (Musa spp.) and thus alternative solutions are needed.Because fruits and vegetables are among the most input-responsive of crops, they are often cultivated in intensive production systems with high fertilizer input. This can lead to an overreliance on inorganic fertilizers to increase yields, but failure to apply enough nutrients will lead to mining of soil nutrients. An appropriate balance of input and offtake of nutrients is required for good soil health. Injudicious use of fertilizer may, however, contribute to the deterioration of soil quality. Accumulation of salts and nitrates from fertilizers in vegetable cropping systems in the North China Plain, for example, has resulted in reduced soil pH, higher electrical conductivity, and raised cadmium concentrations, contributing to rapid soil deterioration (Ju et al., 2007). Leaching of inorganic fertilizer into groundwater may also contaminate water sources used for human and animal consumption, possibly compromising human and animal health. There have been few attempts to investigate nutrient budgets of fruit and vegetable production, but such studies are required to optimize nutrient use and reduce the energy cost of fruit and vegetable production.Research is under way on the use of \"biochar\"-charcoal created by pyrolysis of plant biomass-as one alternative or adjuvant to fertilizer. Biochar may enhance soil physical, chemical, and biological properties. In contrast to the burning and natural decomposition of trees and agricultural matter, which releases a large amount of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, biochar sequesters carbon. Tropical soils are commonly low in organic matter and available nutrients due to high soil temperatures and severe leaching caused by high rainfall. Application of biochar to the soil may improve soil water retention, fertility, and overall quality, thus improving agricultural productivity.For agricultural research and development to achieve societal impact, it is imperative that the results are delivered to, disseminated among, and adopted by the target beneficiaries. Smallholder farmers need to be better advised on the availability of potentially affordable eco-efficient production systems, on what other alternatives may be available and appropriate, and what technologies are available for adoption or adaptation. Therefore, the participation of farmers, as ultimate users of new or adapted agricultural technologies, is crucial when designing research and development activities. An understanding of the constraints and opportunities that farmers encounter and of their assessment of the type of intervention they are willing to adopt and level of risk they are prepared to take is essential to ensure that any innovations are properly targeted to generate effective uptake. Because a sense of ownership is created through the active involvement of the intended users, the outputs of participatory research and development are more likely to be adopted by the target beneficiaries. Information, technical advice, and market price data can be effectively disseminated using popular information technology tools such as mobile phones and the internet. Videos posted on the internet can potentially reach thousands of growers and are cheap to make. Agricultural extension services also play an important role in technology dissemination. NGOs, when provided with appropriate technologies and information, can also deliver important support to smallholder farmers.This case study is based on Alam et al. (2006).Eggplant is very common in the South Asian diet. It is an economically important vegetable, and one of the very few that are available throughout the year at prices generally affordable to everyone. Its intensive cultivation provides a valuable source of income for farmers with small land holdings. Nutritionally, eggplant is a rich source of vitamins B6, C, and K. It also contains dietary minerals such as magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, manganese, and copper, as well as dietary fiber and folic acid. The eggplant fruit and shoot borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) causes damage to the plant by boring into and feeding on both the plant shoots and fruits. It can substantially reduce yields and marketable eggplant fruit harvest and can decrease farmer income significantly. Yield losses of up to 75% are reported in India.Eggplant farmers in Gujarat state, India, have attempted to control the borer by relying exclusively on pesticide sprays. As the borer gradually developed resistance to the commonly applied pesticides, farmers were forced to spray more and more frequently. They started spraying pesticides one month after transplanting and sprayed more than 40 times over the 5-to 6-month growing season. A study in Bangladesh has suggested that farmers may have sprayed up to 90 times during the winter cropping season and 110 times during the summer cropping season. This increased the cost of production significantly, reducing farmer net income.Most farmers adopted some personal protective measures while spraying, thus demonstrating their awareness that pesticides can be harmful to human health. Protective measures ranged from covering their faces with cloth to wearing full protective clothing and washing their hands with soap after spraying. The majority stated that they harvested their eggplants within 2 days of spraying, thus considerably increasing the exposure of both the farmer and the consumer to hazardous pesticide residues both by contact and in the diet. At these spray application intensity levels, pesticide residue can potentially contaminate local drinking water through runoff and seepage.Based on knowledge of the eggplant fruit and shoot borer's biological characteristics, the type of damage to the plants, the agronomy and production requirements of the eggplant, and the local environment; research trials were conducted to develop an intervention strategy to control the borer. This resulted in a simple and affordable IPM strategy that consisted of four parts:1. Sanitation of the planting area by judiciously disposing of eggplant crop residue from the previous season. 2. Prompt cutting and disposal of all damaged shoots and fruits throughout the growing season.3. Installation of traps baited with the borer sex pheromone at the first flush of flowering. 4. Withholding use of pesticides for as long as possible to allow survival and proliferation of native predators and parasitoids attacking the borer.This approach was simple to apply and very affordable since it withholds use of pesticides for as long as possible and only one component (the borer pheromone) needs to be purchased by the farmers.This IPM intervention technology was first disseminated in Jessore district of Bangladesh, in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh states of India, and in the Central Province of Sri Lanka. After the pilot project demonstrated the success of the intervention in reducing pest damage to an economically tolerable level, the technology was widely implemented in other intensive eggplant cultivation areas in South Asia. Distribution of extension brochures in local languages, publicity through print and electronic media coverage, local documentary screenings, and dramas encouraged widespread uptake and adoption by farmers.Subsequent yield losses caused by the eggplant fruit and shoot borer were reduced to 10-15% from an average 34-40%. A preliminary impact study conducted in Bangladesh at the end of the fourth year of the dissemination effort showed a drastic reduction of pesticide use-down from 90 applications to only 21 pesticide applications in the winter season and from 110 applications to 33 applications during the summer season. In India, interviews indicated that 146 farmers sprayed their eggplant crop more than 50 times in the growing season prior to the project. After the project had been implemented, only 27 farmers still continued this intensive spraying regime. The increased yield and decreased expenditure on pesticides resulted in a substantial increase in the farmer incomes. Farmers who adopted the technology achieved a mean net rate of return for eggplant cultivation estimated at 150-240% greater than that of those who continued with their old pesticide application regime.Another significant benefit from this intervention was the growth of small-and medium-sized enterprises selling the sex pheromone lure. At the beginning of the project, the sex pheromone was not commercially available. Within 3 years, three entrepreneurs had started selling the product, and at the end of the project there were nine such businesses in India alone. The combined sales of the two pioneering companies had tripled in two years. In turn, this also benefited the farmers as it further reduced the cost of eggplant production using the IPM technology. Other benefits from the success of the intervention, which were inferred rather than measured, were less pesticide residue on eggplants in the market, reduced health hazards faced by farmers as a result of spraying pesticides less frequently, and better environmental quality in the eggplant production areas.This case study is based on Muniyappa et al. (2002) andNRI (2008;2009). Tomato yellow leaf curl disease (TYLCD) first became a problem on tomato in the eastern Mediterranean region in the mid-1960s. The disease is caused by a begomovirus, Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), transmitted by the whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). The disease can cause total crop loss and is a serious constraint to tomato production globally. Because few varieties can withstand the disease, tomato farmers had no other choice than to control the whitefly with intensive pesticide use, thus encouraging pesticide misuse. The farmers' overreliance on pesticides has spurred the emergence of new, aggressive biotypes of whitefly that are highly mobile and resistant to pesticides. The spread of these more efficient whitefly biotypes with a wide host range has resulted in TYLCD gradually becoming a worldwide problem.Host plant resistance is the ideal cornerstone of control against TYLCD in tomato. It is cost effective and very simple to use as it is incorporated in the seeds that the farmer plants. Thus, research was conducted to develop tomato varieties resistant to the disease. The first resistance gene, Ty-1, conferred resistance to the then prevalent species of the virus and was identified in the wild tomato species, S. chilense. This was bred into commercial varieties, but it soon became apparent that this resistance was ineffective against some emerging species or variants of the virus in some regions. The search then began for other resistance genes. The Ty-2 resistance gene was identified in another wild tomato species, S. habrochaites, and since then a further three resistance genes (Ty-3, Ty-4, and Ty-5) have been identified in other wild species and used in various areas of the world. A 10-year breeding program involving international and advanced agricultural research institutions, the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India, and national agricultural research and development systems incorporated these resistance genes into domesticated lines. Three tomato varieties resistant to TYLCV were released in Karnataka state, India: 'Sankranthi', 'Nandhi', and 'Vybhav'. These varieties are high yielding, tolerate high ambient temperatures, and are also resistant to bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum.Farmers who grew the resistant varieties were able to harvest a much higher yield of tomatoes than non-adopters, even during the peak seasons of disease incidence. Their income levels were seven times as much as those of farmers who grew susceptible varieties; the extra income was used by the households to improve their diet, education, and health care.The resistant germplasm has now been distributed to more than 26 public and private institutions in 13 countries. Private seed companies have started to utilize the germplasm in their breeding programs to produce hybrids, encouraging the scaling out of the benefits of using TYLCV-resistance genes.In addition to planting resistant varieties, farmers were also trained in IPM and encouraged to use it in their production systems to protect the tomato crop from whitefly infestation without overuse of pesticides. Nets were erected over the tomato seedlings to protect them from the disease vectors. The reduced use of pesticides has enabled the development of value-added products such as tomato juice and sauces that are almost free of pesticide residues.This case study is based on CIAT (2010). Naranjilla (S. quitoense) is found in several countries in Latin America, but is economically important mainly in Colombia and Ecuador where more than 30,000 rural families rely on it for their income. It is grown between 700 and 2200 masl on small hillside plots. Naranjilla produces marketable fruits after just 8 months, and continues to produce fruits for 2 to 3 years depending on the health of the plants. The market price of fruits remains fairly stable throughout the year as there is little seasonality of production. Local and international demand is growing, but the crop can be difficult to grow without the use of pesticides, which can result in fruits contaminated with pesticide residues.Naranjilla is highly susceptible to fungal diseases and to pests, including nematodes and fruit borers. Farmers have managed the nematode problem by planting the crop in new plots cut from primary forest to provide land that is free of nematodes and soil-borne diseases that could infect the crop. The alternative is to apply large amounts of chemicals. Both Colombia and Ecuador have developed hybrid varieties of naranjilla with pest and disease resistance. In Ecuador, the interspecific hybrids 'INIAP Puyo' and 'INIAP Palora', developed by the country's National Autonomous Institute for Agricultural Research (INIAP), have been widely grown by smallholder farmers. However, their fruit quality, with respect to fruit size and aroma, is inferior to the almost-extinct local varieties.To address this problem, INIAP scientists searched for and identified disease resistance in closely related species and selected some resistant populations for use as rootstocks. Between 2006 and 2009, field experiments were used to test the performance of the preferred naranjilla variety grafted onto two related, highly compatible species. The resulting cultivar/ rootstock combination was named 'INIAP Quitoense 2009', and was distributed to farmers under an agreement with a commercial nursery. The field data showed a large significant increase in productivity when compared with the interspecific hybrids. In addition, the grafted plants require less chemical input because of their resistance to nematodes and diseases. More than 115 ha were planted with the grafted plants within a year, and farmers are receiving a greater economic return (290%) as a result of the greater consumer appeal of better flavor. As the fruits are less likely to be contaminated with toxic pesticides, there are also now possibilities to address potential export markets.This case study is based on Wyckhuys et al. (2010) and Rengifo et al. (2011).Throughout the developing world, minor tropical fruits generate income and employment opportunities, sustain local livelihoods, and constitute the basis for an emerging agroindustry. In stark contrast with major crops such as mango, pineapple, papaya (Carica papaya), avocado, banana, and citrus, minor fruits still receive comparatively little research attention. However, they are being consumed and traded to an increasing extent. In Colombia, 95% of minor fruit production is in the hands of smallholder farmers, who have few financial resources and are commonly bypassed by government extension programs where they exist. Despite bright market prospects for these fruit crops, stagnant yields, poor management systems, and phytosanitary impediments prevent smallholder producers from fully benefiting from current market opportunities. Phytosanitary issues affect minor fruit production in several ways: directly impacting yield, triggering costly pesticide applications, or subjecting the crops to strict quarantine restrictions on foreign markets.In Colombia, several passion fruit species (Passiflora spp.) are commercially exploited. Most are grown by small-scale, resource poor farmers in some of the country's most deprived and socially volatile rural areas. Lance flies (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) are key pests of these crops, but little information exists regarding their biology, ecology, and management. Incomplete information on the crop's susceptibility to Tephritid fruit flies has resulted in restrictions on exports of fresh fruits to the lucrative US market. Local farmers experience considerable yield losses due to pest attack. They lack the necessary knowledge to properly manage pests and suffer financial losses as a result of pest damage and infestation.A research consortium involving international organizations, local universities, and farmers' associations was formed to devise cost-effective, sustainable, and environmentally sound pest management options for local passion fruit producers. Field surveys from 2008 to 2010 in the major passion fruit production regions shed light on the pest complex, its population dynamics, and geographical infestation patterns. A broad complex of lance fly species was associated with the passion fruit crop, affecting flower buds, flowers, or fruits, and attaining regional infestation levels up to 40%. Repeated field surveys involving more than 200 farmers were unable to find evidence of attack by quarantinable pests such as Tephritid fruit flies. Field studies complemented with laboratory assays were used to investigate the host status of passion fruit crops with respect to one of the most notorious quarantine pests, the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata). Until now, there is no evidence that purple passion fruit is a host for C. capitata and thus quarantine restrictions for this pest-fruit complex for the US market may have to be revised.Next, a national farmer survey was conducted to gain insights into the agroecological knowledge and pest management behavior of local farmers. Aside from the almost universal use of calendarbased insecticide sprays, farmers experimented to a considerable extent with bait traps and low-cost bait types. A few farmers also invented toxic bait sprays and sanitary practices. Using participatory research approaches in five farming communities, some of these local innovations were compared with scientifically defined management tools. Through this approach, farmers discovered for themselves that some of their management tactics were futile while others were much more effective and less costly than their current pesticide use patterns. Farmer experiences were documented using film, and these are currently being shown in multiple communities. Farmers are often eager to try out the practices that are promoted by their peers.Given continuing incidences of injudicious use of insecticides by farmers to manage pests in their crops and the unrelenting importance of pest problems to farm enterprises, research was conducted in collaboration with the National University of Colombia to quantify the susceptibility of passion fruit to attack by lance flies. Lance fly attack was mimicked by removing a different number of flower buds per plant, and the resultant crop yield was recorded. Results showed that passion fruit plants effectively compensated for flower bud loss and only showed sharp drops in yield at relatively high injury levels (K. Wyckhuys 2011, pers. comm.). These findings are currently being used to formulate threshold levels at which insecticide use is justified. This may help farmers move away from current pest management schemes that are costly and harmful to the environment and to the health of farmers and consumers alike.Through this research project, the partnering institutions elucidated the key pest complexes associated with passion fruit, clarified the crop's susceptibility to quarantinable pests, and laid the basis for IPM in the crop. The joint social and ecological project focus proved highly effective in identifying pest management alternatives and further promoting those with local smallholder farmers. In the meantime, the absence of Tephritid fruit flies in these crops could generate tangible market opportunities for smallholder passion fruit producers in Colombia and beyond.In summary, it appears that the examples of eco-efficient management interventions for poor farmers given in this paper can be profitable and sustainable. Nevertheless, such systems tend to be quite knowledge intensive and need to be well understood by farmers if their rate of adoption is to be sufficient to create wide-spread impact. Failure to address such knowledge needs may result in a second generation of problems; it is thus necessary to be sensitive to the additional risks that may be caused by such changes in management systems.One major challenge when using resistance traits to manage pests and diseases is how to ensure the durability of the resistance. The composition and structure of pest and disease populations can evolve rapidly. For example, viruses are notorious for having the ability to recombine and mutate into a wide range of highly diverse variants, which can overcome plant resistance genes and defense mechanisms. In many cases, the change is spurred by selection pressures created by the resistant germplasm. In the case of TYLCV, for example, it is becoming apparent that if only one or two Ty resistance genes are present in a tomato variety, there is a strong selection pressure for the virus to overcome the resistance. Thus the challenge to the breeders is to incorporate several disease-resistance genes in one variety to provide higher levels of resistance to a broad range of variants of the pathogen. Stacking or pyramiding resistance genes in various combinations reduces the possibility of encountering a pathogen species or strain that can overcome the combined resistances, thus improving the chances of durable resistance. The performance of resistant lines in different geographical locations demonstrates that different combinations of resistance genes need to be evaluated locally for durable resistance.An integrated approach, combining various methods to overcome constraints to fruit and vegetable production systems, can raise the resilience of eco-efficient interventions. The sustainability of TYLCD management could, for example, be enhanced by combining host plant resistance to begomoviruses with resistance to the virus vector and IPM practices to control the whitefly vector. Research is underway to attempt to pyramid genes for whitefly resistance into existing tomato lines with multiple Begomovirusresistance genes. Combinations of host plant resistance against these viruses and IPM against the whitefly vectors have been implemented successfully in various cropping systems and regions of the world: on tomato-based mixed cropping in Southeast Asia, on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) production in Central America and the Caribbean, and on cassava (Manihot esculenta) and sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) production in sub-Saharan Africa (CIAT, 2008;Nweke, 2009).The IPM intervention to control eggplant fruit and shoot borer is relatively resilient because several methods are being used to disrupt the insect's lifecycle at various points. A potential risk to the impact of the intervention arises if the pests move from field to field or encroach from surrounding areas. An active network of community-based organizations and policy makers can provide substantial support by encouraging farmers across wider areas to implement agreed intervention practices. Pest and disease management over wide areas is important to ensure impact, as it has been demonstrated by using male sterility to control fruit flies in several countries.Although plant breeding can be used to confer pest and disease resistance in many species, efforts to breed for disease resistance in underutilized vegetables and tropical fruits are almost nonexistent. The focus on tropical fruit production and export in developing countries is relatively new (except in a few specific cases, such as banana and pineapple), and the appearance of these crops in international markets dates back only perhaps a generation or so. The visibility of these crops was based on the selection of particular germplasm that suddenly becomes the prevalent variety in a given region, as was the case for the Gros Michel banana. Multiple examples in avocado, mango, and citrus also exist. Development of pest and disease resistance by breeding programs is likely to have more immediate impact in species with short production cycles than in perennial tropical fruit species. Fruit consumers prefer particular varieties that combine particular color, shape, aroma, and flavor, combinations that are not easy to achieve quickly through breeding. Given the low current investment and research efforts in tropical fruits, it is wise to consider the expertise and knowledge of fruit growers as experimenters, rather than necessarily applying formulaic research-stationbased technologies.Participatory research should be promoted and supported to ensure that the science-based technologies are combined with farmers' and fruit growers' experiences and needs and hence deliver technologies that are adapted and adopted. It is also critical to stakeholders along the value chain, from seed or seedling production through to consumption and the health sector, as well as policy makers, national agricultural research and extension services, the private sector, NGOs, and community-based organizations, all of which influence the eventual uptake and potential success of new technologies.One of the key drivers of success of the TYLCV project in India was the active participation of the target beneficiaries from the start of the project (NRI, 2009). The disease had already been documented as a severe constraint to growers through the national media and farmers' fora. Farmers were consulted to identify their perceived constraints and their target markets and to describe the production and value chains in which they were involved. Farmers and other project participants developed a sense of ownership and pride in the new technology, resulting in increased levels of adoption and multiplying the positive impacts of the intervention. The private sector often has an extended sales and farmer network, and thereby has an advantage in the efficient dissemination of information and improved agricultural technologies. Private seed companies, for example, are important partners in increasing the availability and rate of dissemination of improved, high-quality vegetable seeds. Local communication networks and traditional methods of mass communication (especially rural radio) can also be utilized to promote dissemination of information about new technologies. Film and drama performances, mobile telephones, and other social communication media need to be harnessed to enhance the spread, uptake, and impact of eco-efficient technologies.A further major issue for fruit and vegetable products is that generally they are highly perishable. A recent study in Africa, India, and other developing countries indicated that postharvest losses in fruits and vegetables are probably in the range of 30-40%. The persistently high postharvest losses in the tropics are due to incorrect harvesting times, mishandling, poor packaging, lack of temperature management, difficulties in transportation to markets, and the tendency for horticultural crops to have a definite peak period of production. This production peak, which can saturate markets and decrease the market value of the crop, may force growers to abandon their produce before sale (Kitinoja, 2010). If postharvest losses are not reduced, they may wipe out the gains from eco-efficient production systems. Postharvest management and processing of fruits and vegetables are opportunities to reduce losses, add value, and thus increase net returns. Simple technologies, such as using ice to cool harvested leafy greens prior to transportation to the market and better packaging to reduce losses (e.g., modifiedatmosphere packaging), can add value and reduce risk along value chains. Careful targeting of products (e.g., juice, dried fruit, pickled products) helps ensure a consistent market for produce.There are numerous opportunities to enhance the productivity of fruits and vegetables using ecoefficient methods that will promote consumer safety, reduce risks to farmers, and ensure sustainable and profitable production systems. Building farmers' ability to navigate the future uncertainty of climate change is one of the main strategies in the development of climate-smart production systems. It is therefore imperative to actively involve the farmers themselves in the process. Farmers have a wealth of knowledge and many coping strategies. Their assessment of interventions needed, opportunities, and the level of risk they are willing to bear must be taken seriously in any research and development activity intended to benefit those farmers and their communities. Strong collaboration between the stakeholders along the whole value chain is essential to ensure the development of production systems that are competitive, resilient, and sustainable in the face of future uncertain conditions, be they environmental or economic.Engaging the private sector and development agencies effectively can have benefits for development-oriented research. Although many small-and medium-sized enterprises do not have the capacity to conduct their own research and development activities, they may be willing to provide some financial resources for research that will benefit themselves as well as the public domain. Likewise commercial seed companies can multiply and market fruit and vegetable varieties bred by the public sector, helping ensure that they reach as many farmers as possible. Large NGOs that seek adapted and effective technologies to accomplish their goals also can provide substantial funding for research and development activities on issues identified by themselves and their target communities. Such research and development activities are likely to address neglected and underutilized species that receive little research attention through more formal channels.Development of eco-efficient interventions in fruit and vegetable production will only be possible if dependable, long-term funding is available. Currently, however, research on vegetables and fruits is severely underfunded. Fruits and vegetables have a vital role in ensuring human health; policy makers worldwide should recognize this and provide resources for research and development efforts on behalf of poor farmers. They should be made aware of other benefits likely to be associated with a greater consumption of fruits and vegetables, such as reduced medical expenditures and improved environmental health. Climate-smart and ecologically sound fruit and vegetable production systems will be a key tool in helping smallholder, poor farmers to grow themselves permanently out of poverty, allowing them not only to feed themselves and their communities but also to better nourish the world. If the Millennium Development Goals are to be achieved, such products will need to be available and affordable worldwide. Much good knowledge is already available as a foundation on which to build but political commitment is essential if the world is to benefit from more eco-efficient fruit and vegetable production technologies and systems.(such as land, water, transport, seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and animal feeds, among others), as well as financial instruments (such as affordable credit, crop insurance, stability of prices), could only be provided by the state. Also, the state should provide or subsidize services like buffer stocks, trade protection, insurance, and support for processing and marketing (Chang, 2009).However, this model led to many examples of waste, inefficiencies, and corruption, and by the 1970s there was a growing movement that promoted market-based economic development. This culminated in the implementation of structural adjustment programs by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (Kay, 2006). This new approach later became known as the \"Washington Consensus,\" a phrase coined in 1989 by economist John Williamson, then of the Institute for International Economics.The 1960s and 1970s also saw the emergence of environmental issues in public arenas, culminating in the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) conference on \"Man and his Environment: A View towards Survival\" in 1969 and the first United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1972 (Dunlap, 1991;Jones and Dunlap, 1992;Kraft and Vig, 2006).Early environmental policy frameworks focused on the conservation and rational use of natural resources. This approach aimed to rationally exploit resources as a means to ensure continuous production in an optimal way. Renewable natural resources were considered as unconnected fragments: forests as a source of wood; soil as a support to monoculture production or a deposit for wastes; and freshwater resources as input for various human, industrial, and agricultural uses, or as a place to dispose of contaminated water (Rodríguez and Martínez, 2009).By the mid-1970s, there was a growing recognition of the complex interrelations among organisms, and between organisms and non-living components in their environment. The right to a healthy environment for current and future generations (sustainable development), and the concept of environmental sustainability of productive activities and balance, including agriculture, gained more attention (Miller and Rothman, 1997). As Daly (1974) said, \"It is simply a strategy for good stewardship, for maintaining our spaceship and permitting it to die of old age rather than from the cancer of growthmania.\"The report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (commonly known as the \"Bruntland Commission\") Our Common Future (WCED, 1987) was a major milestone in promoting the broader concept of sustainable development at the global level, defining sustainable development as \"development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.\" The Commission laid the groundwork for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in June 1992; the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development; and Agenda 21, a comprehensive action plan for the UN system, governments, and others in every area in which human activities impact on the environment (www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/). UNCED not only exposed 110 heads of state to the vision of sustainability, but an influential group of actors in the private sector also began to appreciate that sustainability issues extended beyond the obligation of public policy to become a fundamental part of business strategy.After UNCED, several countries revised their institutional arrangements and policies to promote sustainability. In the agricultural sector, the emphasis has been mainly on increasing production of food while assuring the capacity of the environment to recover and provide ecosystem services. Biodiversity loss, water supply deterioration, and soil and water pollution have been increasingly recognized as severe symptoms of a crisis represented by the loss of the capacity of natural resources to sustain agricultural systems.For many sectors, especially private entrepreneurs, the necessary symbiosis between economic, social, and environmental sustainability meant approaching the issue from a more positive perspective. Thus, in the 1990s, new concepts such as cleaner production and eco-efficiency were introduced with a focus on combining both economic and environmental efficiency.In 1992, a group of businessmen led by Stephan Schmidheiny created the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and promoted the concept of eco-efficiency in a book entitled Changing Course (Schmidheiny, 1992). According to the WBCSD, eco-efficiency is achieved through the delivery of \"competitively priced goods and services that satisfy human needs and bring quality of life while progressively reducing environmental impacts of goods and resource intensity throughout the entire life cycle to a level at least in line with the Earth's estimated carrying capacity\" (WBCSD, 2000). In the agricultural sector, eco-efficiency was promoted as the aspiration to maintain or improve the economic sustainability of crops (yields), while contributing to the environmental sustainability (less use of natural resources). Chapters 1 and 2 of this volume devote considerable space to the history and definitions of the eco-efficiency concept in agriculture.The ability to increase agricultural productivity will be facilitated by advances in life sciences, including a better understanding of the dynamics of ecosystems and their environmental services. One of the conclusions of the special rapporteur of the United Nations (UN) (De Schutter, 2010) is that it is not enough to designate large amounts of money for agriculture. There need to be measures that facilitate the transition to a type of agriculture that is low in carbon emissions and that conserves natural resources in a way that benefits the poor.According to De Schutter (2010), agricultural production will have to increase by 70% by 2050 to meet anticipated demand. Achieving this will require technologies that are both more efficient and environmentally friendly, reducing the negative impacts of agriculture on the environment and society. Such production technologies will offset the harmful effects of economic development on environmental quality.Agricultural institutions in developing countries have immense food security and eco-efficiency challenges. While most agriculture ministries tend to be based on centralized governmental models, reforms in many countries have moved toward privatization of state-owned enterprises and elimination of marketing boards and other regulatory agencies. However, the historical value of such institutions and the public goods they provided has not always been fully appreciated. Public sector investments in the development of input and output markets, in agricultural extension, and in applied agricultural research have been vital to agricultural development in every economy in the world. Institutional reform without investment in these public goods does not produce economic growth in the agricultural sector. Conducive institutional and policy environments remain cornerstones of agricultural development (Koroma, 2007).The changing relationship between the public sector, civil society, and the private sector will require a unified, comprehensive, and adaptive vision toward the increasing scarcity of natural resources and external factors such as climate change to achieve greater environmental and economic efficiency in the medium and long term in developing countries. There is no unique policy prescription that fits the diversity of the agricultural sector in the developing countries. While enhancing productivity is a common essential requirement, the nature of the increase in productivity envisaged, including eco-efficiency parameters, will determine the appropriate policy mix.Change is not easy; encouraging new, sustainable, and eco-efficient agricultural practices is a slow process. It entails transaction costs: the new practices require that farmers understand and are trained in new techniques, development of innovative financial alternatives, creation of market value and markets for new products that help alleviate poverty, and development of policies that promote long-term food security.There are several policy dimensions that governments should address to push forward the eco-efficiency agenda into modern laws, policies, and renewed agricultural institutions. The following sections explore how states can reorient their agricultural systems towards modes that are more productive and efficient and that assure long-term sustainability and equity for present and future generations.Strengthening eco-efficiency in agriculture requires changes to approaches for maintaining soil fertility and improving yields, and increasing the efficiency of use of external inputs by farmers. Common practices such as subsidies on fertilizer and pesticides, for example, while conducive to short-term increases in production, are likely to result in farmers adopting practices that are neither eco-efficient nor sustainable. A case in point is Malawi (see box). Policies that encouraged use of hybrid seed and fertilizer resulted in record maize harvests in 2005/06 and 2006/07 (although this was in part due to favorable rainfall patterns in those years) (Dorward et al., 2008). However, they also encouraged reliance on purchased inputs rather than more-sustainable production practices such as crop rotations. To address this, the government has subsequently implemented programs to encourage farmers to adopt sustainable land management practices and build soil fertility, prevent soil erosion, and conserve rain water through practices such as manuring, composting, contour ridging, minimum tillage, and agroforestry, as well as diversifying production of food crops (Daudi, n.d.).Rather than relying completely on chemical fertilizers, farmers can sometimes increase soil fertility by using improved agronomic practices, such as planting trees, legumes, and forages that fix atmospheric nitrogen. Agroforestry is widely practiced in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. In Tanzania, for example, more than 350,000 ha have been rehabilitated with agroforestry practices. Diversification of agricultural systems is also an important element of eco-efficiency, contributing to maintenance of soil fertility, prevention of soil erosion, enhancing overall system productivity and provision of ecosystem services, and increasing resilience to shocks such as climate change or sudden changes in markets. It also contributes to providing a more balanced diet and creates employment opportunities.Governments should also promote local seed systems that are able to provide farmers with high-quality seed of appropriate crops and varieties, rather than relying on imported seed. Selection of varieties for local adaptation and consumer needs can typically bring productivity and sustainability advantages over those selected in non-targeted environments. Unless modern varieties are selected for local needs, local landraces may perform just as well, and be preferred by farmers (Van Mele et al., 2011). Strengthening local capacity for seed production will help farmers cope with changing or harsh conditions. Support might include financial instruments for seed production, empowerment of seed producers, and provision of appropriate irrigation infrastructure (Dalohoun et al., 2011).According to IFPRI's Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI), average age of agricultural researchers, teachers, and technicians in developing countries is quite high. In some cases, this problem is a threat to the continuity of agricultural research and development (R&D) and training in developing countries. Country reports can be downloaded from ASTI's web page at www.asti.cgiar.org/ publications, and examples are noted in Figure 13-1.Investment in agricultural R&D and extension has stagnated in recent years except in a few countries such as Brazil, China, and India (Beintema and Stads, 2010;Stads and Beintema, 2012), despite evidence that such investment reduces rural poverty as well as increases agricultural productivity (Fan, 2010).Developing and promulgating eco-efficient agricultural systems will require increased investment in training scientists and educators who can deliver new practices through renewed agricultural extension services. These services require training at all levels. Agro-ecology will need to be incorporated in high-school curricula. Agricultural technicians also should receive a strong grounding in agro-ecology.Agriculture is a key sector of the Malawian economy. It employs over 80% of the workforce, provides an estimated 64% of total income of the rural people, contributes over 80% of foreign exchange, earnings, and accounts for 39% of GDP.In early post-independence days, the government was heavily involved in the smallholder agricultural sector in areas of production, extension, technology development, and marketing of agricultural commodities. However, despite these efforts, poverty remained widespread and severe. In 1979, the government oriented its policies towards poverty reduction and introduced a structural adjustment program with support of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. There was a price decontrol to allow market forces and competition. Other reforms included the Special Crops Act, the Seed Act, and the Chemical and Pesticide Act. However, lack of concerted efforts by actors in the sector compromised the success of the policy reforms.Since the beginning of the new millennium, policies have changed to address increased productivity. Freeinput programs and input subsidy programs were developed to provide farmers with coupons to buy hybrid seeds and fertilizers at subsidized prices. At the same time, the Government developed a minimum floor price for the purchase of several crops such as maize, cotton, and tobacco.The country realized maize surplus production since the start of the program. Malawi was able to attain food security and produce sufficient surplus maize to export to other countries.Attaining food security implied having the resources to address sustainability and eco-efficiency issues. Several programs are currently in place to sustain land and water management in view of weather variability and climate change. There are programs to encourage farmers to adopt sustainable land management practices and build soil fertility, prevent soil erosion, and conserve rain water. Current practices include manuring, composting, contour ridging, minimum tillage, and agroforestry.Ongoing efforts to strengthen research in agricultural production and utilization of available technologies in collaboration with farmer-led extension services are being introduced with an emphasis on market-and industry-oriented research.The experience of Malawi shows that agricultural productivity in developing countries needs concerted government efforts to raise productivity, consolidate markets, promote technologies that match the farmer resources base and have the capacity then to ensure eco-efficiency practices to sustain natural resources. But, while the Malawi experience of concerted policy action by a national government is an encouraging sign of policy leadership, important questions remain around the sustainability of the higher-input production practices, the eco-efficiency of inputs used, and the efficiency of the whole value chain for the Malawian food systems. SOURCE: www.un.org/esa/dsd/dsd_aofw_wat/wat_pdfs/meetings/ws0109/1_Malawi_Daudi.pdf University agriculture curricula should encompass innovative research, science, and technology. Integrating traditional production systems with more modern and scientific methods will promote adaptation of technologies and knowledge assimilation and application at the local level. This will require new information platforms and technology transfer.For agricultural R&D to accomplish their objectives, it is imperative that the target beneficiaries understand and adopt the approaches developed. Most research projects that have delivered impact have included the active participation of the target beneficiaries from the start of the project. Therefore, governmental policies should encourage extension services to actively involve farmers and other stakeholders along the value chain in developing and testing novel approaches.Achieving greater agricultural eco-efficiency will require a push by both governments and the private sector. Both will have to seek to combine the best of traditional agricultural practices with modern technologies and inputs to deliver sustainable, eco-efficient agricultural systems (Uphoff, 2001).More people in developing countries are opting to move to the cities in order to improve their economic and social conditions, and to have better access to basic services, such as health and education, and other public goods provided by the government (Stern, 2007). The rural areas require urgent investments to maintain the rural communities in place. Agricultural growth and poverty reduction depend critically on investments in rural infrastructure (irrigation, roads, transport, power, and telecommunications), markets, rural finance, research, education, and extension. Such The World Bank (2008) concludes that investing in public goods could have a greater impact on per-capita income than investing in private goods such as pesticides or fertilizers, while assuring more-sustainable practices. In Latin America, the share of rural subsidies provided by governments is greater where income inequality is highest. Better policies are needed to ensure that the poorer, especially smallholder producers, have access to basic services and infrastructure. Reassigning spending toward public goods without increasing the overall level of spending on agriculture might be sufficient to transition into eco-efficient agriculture (The World Bank, 2008). According to Allcott et al. (2006), \"even without changing overall expenditures, governments can improve the economic performance of their agricultural sectors by devoting a greater share of those expenditures to social services and public goods instead of non-social subsidies.\"Political and economic pressures that determine budget allocations must be addressed to ensure transparency, equity, and accountability of resource allocation.Major businesses are increasingly aware of the benefits of eco-efficiency -at the producer levelof their production chains. For example, Unilever's target for 2020 is to source 100% of their agricultural raw materials from sustainable production systems. Other businesses are thinking not only about eco-efficiency, but also about the nutritional quality of each product. Some large companies are involving communities and smallscale growers as co-owners and participants in their production chain -sharing benefits.To generate efficient green supply chains, producers must be linked to modern supply chains that are increasingly dominated by supermarket chains and multinational companies. For example, by the early 2000s, supermarkets accounted for more than half of all retail food sales in many countries in Latin America (Reardon and Berdegué, 2002;The World Bank, 2008). Supermarket buying agents prefer to buy from medium-and large-scale farms, as it is easier for them to deliver standardized product, and dealing with a small number of large suppliers reduces transaction costs for the buyer. However, consumers are increasingly demanding environmentally safe and socially responsible products. Retailers such as Whole Foods in the USA who meet this demand are growing rapidly (Marquis et al., 2009).In this context, the role of public policies can be to help smallholders expand and upgrade to meet the necessary requirements of modern supply. Such policies should support market-oriented extension services, establish grades and standards, assist farmers in contract design and management (including understanding their rights and obligations), create an enabling environment for insurance and credit markets, and be based on an understanding of social and environmental requirements to be able to provide for green supply chains.Governments could also create public procurement programs, with incentives for organic food or fair-trade chains. For example, the strategy of the United Kingdom (UK) for sustainable farming and food (DEFRA, 2002) and the country's organic action plan (DEFRA, 2003) both highlight the public sector as a key area in which to market UK-produced organic food (OAPSG, 2008). The message that procuring eco-efficient goods can have a positive impact on the economy is important. There is also a potential to broaden policy goals, e.g., to improve health and education, increase opportunities for small-and medium-sized enterprises working in the food sector, and create jobs, as well as to support environmental objectives and local producers.Urbanization can help reduce poverty in developing countries by increasing proximity between resources and markets and through economies of scale that enable cost-effective, efficient delivery of basic infrastructure and services (Stern, 2006). For example, Mogues (2011) found that public investment in transportation networks gave the highest return-on-investment ratios of any state interventions in Ethiopia, but variability of returns between regions within the country suggested that regional planning was necessary. However, not everyone in urban areas benefits equally, and special attention will need to be paid to the urban poor, who are particularly vulnerable to food insecurity (Mason et al., 2011). In 2002, the urban poor accounted for 59% of the total population in Latin America, 30% in sub-Saharan Africa, and 25% in India (Chen and Ravalliona, 2007). However, changes in consumer preferences due to increased income or access to moresophisticated markets boost demand for food that requires more resources to produce, e.g., meat and animal products. Consequently, livestock numbers are expected to double by 2020 (IPCC, 2001), increasing significantly the amount of methane released into the atmosphere and contributing to climate change. Also, intensity of fertilizer use and energy is expected to increase in all developing regions.Globalization has meant that food supply chains are increasingly long and complex, but there is also a trend toward consolidation of these chains in the hands of large, multinational companies. These companies influence what is grown, where, how, and at what price. Increasingly, however, large companies are beginning to understand that their long-term competitiveness depends on protecting the environment and the services it provides (Bishop et al., 2010). New environmental and social concerns are influencing the way food is produced and the rules under which it is traded. Consumers are beginning to demand that producers engage in fair trade, management of the ecosystem and environmental services, minimization of climate impacts, food safety measures, and improving working conditions. This calls for transparency of production standards and traceability, which can be promoted through green certification schemes and eco-labeling. While many certification and labeling schemes have rigorous standards and third-party auditing, many more do not. Making these schemes effective will require government support for certification and verification.In addition, elements of eco-efficiency are beginning to play a prominent role. Sustainability standards are becoming more important every day. Prices of the food products we consume must now cover not only the direct cost of production but also the costs of making the production chain sustainable and reducing the environmental and social footprint in the countries of origin.Ministries of trade, environment, and agriculture, in concert with investment and export agencies, should consider creating efficient platforms to address green production chains and develop specific policies on fair trade and sustainability standards in general.China and India, the two most populous nations on the planet, have chosen to support organic agriculture, especially for poor farmers, as a means of alleviating poverty in rural areas.In both countries, organic products take up only a small fraction of the food market. According to the Foundation Ecology and Agriculture (SÖL), there were just over 300,000 ha of certified organic crops in China (Giovannucci, 2005), out of the 130 million ha of arable land. The domestic market in China was valued at nearly US$250 million. In India, according to SÖL, in 2004 the organic production was done in 76,000 ha out of the 180 million ha of arable land. Even though these values are relatively small, the organic production has been rocketing in recent years and constitutes a good example of effective strategies that promote eco-efficient practices.In the case of China, officially supported organic farming started in the 1980s, and by the year 1990, the Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences (NIES) began implementing protocols of international organic certification. The objective of this strategy in China is to: (1) help decongest the farmland near big cities, which has been intensively cultivated over the centuries, and (2) assist smallholder farmers in remote areas to produce with less reliance on expensive external inputs (Giovannucci, 2005). While organic farms originally belonged to local governments, the central government has adopted a policy of developing market mechanisms. Thus, local governments have been gradually handing over property rights to private companies and individuals, giving financial and technical support for a more efficient resource management and market access of products to farmers.Given the variety and importance of its agricultural products, India has had a tradition of organic farming that goes back centuries. Organic production has traditionally been practiced by civil society and particularly NGOs and farmer groups. They have also developed various practical schemes in different regions to suit weather conditions and rainfall, as well as existing varieties. Because 60% of all crops in India are rainfed, the government has placed emphasis on organic agriculture as a strategy to ensure food security and poverty reduction. To implement a plan of norms and standards, the Ministry of Agriculture has set up a special Working Committee for organics and the Ministry of Commerce set up a National Steering Committee (Giovannucci, 2005).Both cases show how government could implement organic policies that could influence productivity chains at the global scale, given the large populations of both countries.Every day consumers play a more fundamental role in promoting eco-efficiency options through their selections of food and other products. Food-borne diseases and poor nutrition continue to be widespread, and more consumers are interested in knowing the quality of their food. In this regard, green certification and eco-labeling are tools that play a more critical role so that consumers have references of what they buy. Under these terms, transparency and traceability are two key issues that need attention. Producers must be transparent about the eco-efficiency and sustainability parameters of their production chain. They must try to make their products, origins, and production systems traceable, as well as create a transparent system of social and environmental accountability that can be understood by the consumer and the producers. There are many eco-labels in the market, related to fair-trade schemes, eco-efficient agricultural practices, footprint reduction, tracing sources or ensuring food quality and safety. While many eco-labels have rigorous standards and third-party auditing, the labels themselves are only emblems of the certification scheme, providing consumers little information and requiring that everyone conduct their own research. With so many labels in the marketplace, even the environmentally conscious shopper can become easily confused.Eco-labels, however, are feasible if governments support the certification and verification schemes to help market dynamics to align with equitable and sustainable development and eco-efficient principles. Governments should facilitate sustainable production systems including incentive schemes to achieve initial momentum. In addition, they should also monitor the results and foster public-private schemes that promote food sustainability.Public procurement systems, tax and credit incentives, and land policies should be designed to facilitate transition toward eco-efficient agriculture. Such policies include, for example, temporary tax exemptions for farms adopting eco-efficient practices and preferential interest rates for investments in eco-efficient systems.Regularization of land tenure and the creation of a solid property rights framework also encourage farmers and landowners to invest in the long-term fertility of land. These should include forms of land tenure that are more accessible to women and formal recognition of traditional forms of land ownership and tenure (The World Bank, 2008). In addition, cross subsidies and incentive schemes can also promote eco-efficient agriculture. For example, in 2009 the Government of Brazil issued a law requiring at least 30% of school meals to consist of food from local family farms.At the same time, governments could organize or steward markets to protect smallholder farmers from price volatility, and create or eliminate production subsidies to help small-scale producers, without affecting competitiveness at the regional level. Governments often implement open-trade policies that lead to the import of products that are cheaper than those produced locally. One way of enhancing local competitiveness would be to generate models of association where small-scale producers can join value chains that add value to local activities. Another related strategy would be to discourage the use of imported pesticides and fertilizers, encouraging use of local alternatives and production practices to reduce costs and enhance sustainability.Governments will have to increase their investment in the agriculture sector to promote eco-efficiency (Horlings and Marsden, 2011). Similarly, the financial sector can contribute with new financial instruments, e.g., equity funds that invest in green production chains. Agricultural banks need to produce collateral-free financial schemes, create consistent lines of credit and guarantees, and facilitate access to credit for small-scale farmers.There is an ongoing debate about the wisdom of state intervention, which can distort markets and create inefficiencies (Chang, 2009). It is clear, nevertheless, that some interventions are necessary to correct situations that would create larger distortions if not addressed. Such is the case of subsidies and incentives to create or provide public goods, such as agricultural research, that otherwise would not be sustainable. Incentives or subsidies are also welcome when vulnerable groups are losing ground (The World Bank, 2008).Finally, governmental policies in agriculture, environment, energy, transportation, and other sectors should be more coherent and interlinked. Agricultural governance 3 and resources that regulate, guide, and direct the process of agricultural and rural development must have a renewed vision. This vision is one that recognizes the benefits of eco-efficient farming methods that are more productive, sustainable, and less harmful to the environment.The empowerment and mobilization of rural communities is a very powerful tool to ensure sustainable development and eco-efficient practices. Numerous studies have shown that involvement of stakeholders, communities, and other potential beneficiaries in planning and management increases the probability of success of development efforts (Rondinelli, 1982;Uphoff, 1996;Bakker, 2011). Such community-driven development mobilizes community groups and involves them directly in decisions on public spending, harnessing their creativity, capabilities, and social capital (The World Bank, 2008). Community-driven projects have shown the potential to scale up, be more cost effective, make fiscal transfers more efficient, and increase income from agriculture. Achieving this requires a policy environment that supports capacity strengthening in rural communities, learning and adoption of new technologies, participatory research and R&D extension networks, knowledge management, and sharing of best practices (Horlings and Marsden, 2011). Governance has to be reinforced by making all decision processes more transparent and participatory.Social accountability mechanisms that guarantee transparency on government investments will increase community participation in the new production structure (Reuben, 2005). Information policies and tools will enable rural populations to assimilate and claim ownership of the new ecoefficient concepts (Keating et al., 2010).The structural reforms of the 1980s often dismantled the public agencies that provided services to farmers, such as access to credit, insurance, inputs, and information in the developing world (The World Bank, 2008), with the expectation that the private sector would take over these functions in a more effective way. The private sector, however, has developed only slowly, leaving farmers, especially small-scale farmers, with little or no access to these services in many countries. Restoring these services requires an analysis of what worked and what did not, and clarification of roles between the private and public sectors.From the 1960s, Thailand immersed itself in agricultural development based on increased productivity and use of agricultural surplus to boost other sectors, with strong orientation towards exports (Buch-Hansen, 2001). This scheme was successful during the decades of the 1970s and 1980s, making the Southeast Asian \"tiger\" a world-class agricultural producer. The 1997 Asian economic crisis, with the overheating of the economy and the financial meltdown, led the government to change their perspective about agricultural development in Thailand. The Eighth National Development Plan (1997Plan ( -2001) ) and the Ninth (2002-2006) and Tenth (2007-2011) changed the emphasis of development strategy to give greater weight to citizen participation and criteria of self-sufficiency, poverty alleviation, and environmental protection. One of the biggest changes occurred in agricultural policy, which promotes sustainable agriculture, to reverse the damage to the environment (Amekawa, 2010). At present, the Thai government is putting considerable effort on research and technology developments of agricultural production that are friendly to the environment and at the same time increase productivity.Policy makers need to be informed about important concepts such as sustainability, agroecological farming, and environmental services, and should understand the implications of sustainable agricultural production, to effectively create the necessary new legislation and supervise its enforcement.The private sector needs to be more involved in agricultural production, particularly through public-private partnerships (Swanson and Samy, 2002). Engaging the private sector will require the correct incentives, an appropriate business environment, and solid property rights (Fan, 2010).Poor infrastructure and limited access to markets hinder production and diminish profits for smallholder farmers in remote or poorly serviced regions. Transport and communications infrastructure has to be built or improved to allow products to reach markets as fast and inexpensively as possible. This might entail the construction and improvement of roads, railways, storage and distribution centers, and market places. Improving education and health infrastructure in rural areas will help reduce rural-urban migration and promote economic growth in rural areas.The challenges facing the agricultural sector are complex, not the least of which are population growth, environmental degradation, and climate change. Efforts to address these challenges will require concerted action of various sectorsenvironment, education, health, trade, among others -and planning tools that are capable of integrating these areas. Agriculture ministries will need to devise new visions and means of cooperation with the ministries responsible for these other sectors. (The World Bank, 2008). The World Bank recently estimated the annual adaptation costs in the agriculture sector in developing countries to be US$2.5-2.6 billion per year between 2010 and 2050 (The World Bank, 2010). Mechanisms for increasing investment in climate-smart agriculture include, for example, public-private partnerships, carbon-offset markets, and long-term international official development assistance combined with carbon finance.In the forest sector, approaches such as REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries) are emerging that involve market instruments based on real emission quantification results. Mechanisms to protect forests while increasing agricultural production will require incentives to employ eco-efficient agriculture practices in conjunction with measures to prevent deforestation from agricultural expansion. This will depend on raising awareness of the role of forests in providing ecosystem services and their contribution to livelihoods. Ra et al. (2011), for example, indicate that households living near forests in Cambodia generate 21-34% of their income from the forests. However, for REDD+ to be effective, new institutions capable of implementing payment mechanisms based on reporting, monitoring, and verification are required (Angelsen et al., 2009). In this context, it will be essential to implement policies that ensure that indigenous communities, peasants, and women are involved in the nationallevel decision-making processes of REDD+ schemes.Many governments around the world are now promoting low-carbon economies. Member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have committed themselves to promoting green investments and sustainable management of natural resources, with incentives to build low-carbon infrastructure economies as well as research in science and technology to achieve sustainable societies \"low in carbon\" (OECD, 2011a). Asian countries signed a unified vision toward green growth in 2005 at the Ministerial Meeting on Environment and Development in Asia and the Pacific. Several countries have developed concrete green growth and low-carbon policies, including Brazil (Zanella, 2011), China, Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand; and countries in the Near East and North Africa, Latin America, and Africa are ready to follow suit. Korea's green-growth strategy integrally promotes sustainable agriculture with innovation, policies, and financing (Kim, 2010).The agricultural sector consumes nearly 70% of available fresh water, compared with 22% used for manufacturing and energy, and 8% used for drinking, sanitation, and recreation (WWAP, 2009). Increasing demand from all sectors and likely changes in supply resulting from climate change will increase strains on existing supplies.Large irrigation systems were the models in the 1970s, with investments that were later challenged for being inefficient, generating corruption schemes and degrading the environment without achieving reasonable long-term use of water. At the same time, individual water schemes from aquifers increased the ease of having pumps and extraction mechanisms, depleting and contaminating much of the world's aquifers. In the face of increasing food consumption, production systems need to ensure a water supply to meet global production needs.Water sources such as rivers, lakes, and aquifers rarely lie within the boundaries of single nations, and hence managing water resources will require international cooperation and international and regional policy measures. Hermans et al. ( 2005) note several regional schemes that provide funds for improving the management of water catchments and therefore the long-term water supply.Furthermore, techniques for the efficient use of water for agriculture exist in various forms. A prime example exists in Israel, where drip irrigation developed on the kibbutz in the 1960s was exploited as an export opportunity. In Italy, the open irrigation systems were converted into irrigation pipes, reducing the evaporation and loss from the inefficient system. There are also individual control systems of irrigation with computer models that allow to reduce the volume, while making more equitable use of water by various users (OECD/FAO, 2010).Measuring water footprint will be critical. Agricultural industries will have to take into account estimates of their water usage and implement measures to minimize it (Segal and MacMillan, 2009). For example, following a series of water-footprint studies, Coca-Cola is seeking to reduce its water footprint by developing and encouraging more-sustainable agricultural practices that benefit suppliers, customers, consumers, and local watersheds (The Coca-Cola Company and The Nature Conservancy, 2010).Solutions to poverty, hunger, and the climate crisis require agriculture that promotes producers' livelihoods, knowledge, resiliency, health, and equitable gender relations, while enriching the natural environment and helping to balance the carbon cycle (IAASTD, 2009). In line with this, some governments currently rethinking agriculture have placed those who produce, distribute, and consume food at the heart of food systems and policies, rather than the demands of markets and corporations. Connecting producers and consumers through fair-trade and green production chains is emerging as a win-win policy to address poverty issues, feed the world, and have a healthier planet.Consumers are increasingly demanding transparency about origins of food products, trading conditions, and carbon footprints, leading to a rise in eco-labeling and certification schemes in global agricultural markets. Supermarket chains supporting these processes, such as Sequoia in Belgium and Whole Foods and Trader Joe's in the USA, have gained favor with consumers and grown comparatively faster than competitors who have been slower to embrace these schemes (Marquis et al., 2009).Reducing postharvest losses and food waste would go a long way towards reducing the ecological impact of food production. It is estimated that more than 30% of the food produced is wasted, especially by the final consumer in developed countries (Gooch et al., 2010). Much of the loss in developing countries is due to poor storage, packaging, and transport. Improvements in storage and transport infrastructure, packaging, and marketing would reduce losses and the environmental impact of food production.Developing policies that encourage adoption of new agricultural technologies that can increase productivity, while preserving environmental resources, is a key strategy for governments that seek to reduce the negative environmental externalities caused by agricultural activities (Fuglie and Kascak, 2001).The recent International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) conducted by the World Bank in collaboration with a group of agencies of the United Nations called for technological development through networks and associations, and development of capabilities across borders and regions. Our future food security will depend on sharing research and development results and on increasing budgets for research, science, and technology.The European Union (EU) is taking an unprecedented leap in establishing a green growth policy for the agricultural sector. Several EU countries have been pioneers in this field. For example, the Netherlands has a long tradition in policies promoting sustainable agriculture, including restricting the use of pesticides, management of soil and water acidification, landscape management, and biodiversity. Their strategy to remain one of the world's largest agricultural producers as a small country is to differentiate themselves in environmental management and general innovation.Green growth has become one of the highest priorities of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) governments. A press release from the agriculture ministers meeting at OECD in 2010 notes that \"Ministers recognized that green growth offers opportunities to contribute to sustainable economic, social, and environmental development; that agriculture has an important role to play in the process, as do open markets that facilitate the sharing of technologies and innovations supportive of green growth, and that, in this context, care needs to be taken to avoid all forms of protectionism. Climate change presents challenges and opportunities for the agricultural sector in reducing GHG emissions, in carbon sequestration, and the need for adaptation\" (OECD, 2011b).There is increasing international coordination of research addressing climate change issues facing agriculture, such as: Similar partnerships are needed on shared ecosystem services management, biodiversity use and conservation, second-and third-generation bioenergy, green production chains, and health and food security management.Finally, all this will be possible only if there is a fundamental shift in food consumption, from foods with high input demands to less resourceintensive foods, and if waste and postharvest losses are reduced. Capacity strengthening has evolved considerably over the years, as agricultural research has come to focus more sharply on development. Table 14-1 summarizes this shift from a relatively narrow focus on training for improved food production, mainly through plant breeding, to a more systemic approach for rural innovation.As research for development has evolved, it has searched for better ways to reach large numbers of end users. Reflecting on obstacles to research impact in the 1990s, social scientists began to question the so-called \"pipeline\" approach for addressing farmers' problems through scientifically proven technologies. Starting about 30 years ago, various participatory approaches were developed and tested, with emphasis on the learning cycle, in which users of agricultural research products and services learn together through partnerships and stakeholder engagement, thus increasing the chances of research results being put to use.Current approaches have their roots in two closely related theoretical fields: social learning and innovation systems. According to Leeuwis and Pyburn (2002), academics introduced the concept of social learning with an interest in studying and promoting sustainable development (Dunn, 1971;Friedmann, 1984;Milbrath, 1989;Woodhill, 2002). Social learning, as described by Röling (1992), assigns a central role to multistakeholder platforms that facilitate interaction and promote learning for change. The facilitator's role is to help establish these platforms and catalyze dynamics that foster synergy.The concept of innovation systems emerged from inquiries into research and technology transfer, leading to an examination of the wider innovation process (Hall et al., 2004). Innovation is a complex process, described by Smits (2002) as the successful combination of \"hardware\" (new technical devices), \"software\" (new knowledge and modes of thinking), and \"orgware\" (new institutions and forms of organization). It depends on effective collaboration, networking of interdependent social actors, and other new forms of coordinated action. Innovation is thus a collective achievement rather than the result of individual adoption (Leeuwis, 2004).A key message of this chapter is that making agriculture more eco-efficient requires a major commitment to developing capacity for innovation through continuous learning, particularly for stakeholders who have previously been excluded in research. One recent study (Mehta-Bhatt and Beniest, 2011) suggests that CGIAR centers have responded in various ways to new trends in capacity development. The sections that follow explore some of the results.The authors of a recent working paper (Horton et al., 2009) define partnership as \"a sustained multi-organizational relationship with mutually agreed objectives and an exchange or sharing of resources or knowledge for the purpose of generating research outputs (new knowledge or technology) or fostering innovation (use of new ideas or technology) for practical ends.\" As this definition suggests, partnerships may involve diverse actors, working under informal or formal arrangements while sharing responsibilities and decision making. They may also have a wide range of objectives-from the delivery of specific research products to the creation of a shared context for innovation and joint learning.Partnerships are essential for achieving impact through today's complex and ambitious agenda of agricultural research for development. Key actors in this work include civil society organizations, national research and educational institutions, the private sector, national policy makers, regional multistakeholder networks, donors, and the media. Such partners bring diverse perspectives to bear on shared goals, providing the basis for an equitable learning culture. This can increase the potential for solving problems successfully, generating useful knowledge, and empowering local actors. Further benefits include stronger resource mobilization, greater legitimacy, reduced risks, and increased flexibility.Partnerships have evolved in step with the broader trends in agricultural research that are described in the introduction to this chapter (see Table 14-1). The purely research alliancesAs described in Chapter 12, researchers are using participatory methods to develop technologies aimed at ecologically sustainable improvement in the production of fruits and vegetables. This work provides a clear example of how research can help build the capacity of smallholder farmers to deal more effectively with shifting production constraints and market conditions through more eco-efficient practices.Such initiatives require that scientists take a more systemic view, emphasizing the importance of crop diversity and of maximizing the producivitty of varied ecological niches. It is also important for donors and other stakeholders to create a policy environment that encourages collaboration between research and development agencies. Financial and human resources must be dedicated to the promotion of greater crop diversity and to the development of more resilient and profitable agricultural systems. A different type of education is needed to avoid overspecialization in agriculture and to promote better understanding of integrated crop management options, of the need to balance crops and livestock, and of the importance of balanced human diets.of the 1960s have given way to new contractual relationships, which in the best cases transform knowledge into action, leading to sustainable development outcomes. This shift involves more systemic approaches to partnership, in which research is just one part of a complex puzzle (Kristjansen et al., 2009) or \"complex adaptive system,\" which also involves development methods and evolving knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Current partnerships often use tools such as outcome mapping, participatory impact pathway analysis (Álvarez et al., 2010), and other types of stakeholder analysis, such as social network analysis, for joint planning. Such approaches are useful for determining each partner's degree of influence on users of research products and therefore their potential multiplier effect and contribution to impact.Partnerships figure importantly in the new research strategy resulting from recent CGIAR reforms (CGIAR, 2011). They are central to more-innovative arrangements in research for sustainable development that involve advanced research institutes, reduce costs, and deploy new technologies, among other ends (Spielmann et al., 2007).Since eco-efficient agriculture aims to reduce negative environmental impacts, its success depends on partnerships involving stakeholders engaged in environmental research and advocacy. Civil society organizations have an especially important role to play in these partnerships because of their ability to achieve positive multiplier effects (CGIAR, 2006), including the development of site-specific solutions that address the needs of the rural poor.Partnerships for eco-efficient agriculture must pay particular attention to the needs of women. According to FAO (2011), women comprise, on average, 43% of the agricultural labor force in developing countries, ranging from about 20% in Latin America to almost 50% in Eastern and Southeastern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.Interestingly, the report observes that female farmers produce less than male farmers, not because they are less efficient but because of differences in their use of inputs. This underscores the need for further research on the relationship between gender, production, and eco-efficiency. It is also important for research partners to be selected on the basis of their gender vision and practices, with the aim of achieving gender balance in partnership governance.Institutional arrangements in research for sustainable agricultural development are increasingly based on equity and accountability among all stakeholders (GFAR, 2010). Establishing trust and respect are fundamental for building confidence and empowering stakeholders.As development expert Robert Chambers noted in a recent interview: \"So much in a partnership depends on what sorts of people are involved, how they relate to one another, how participatory they are, whether they dominate or whether they facilitate, how they make other people feel, whether they feel comfortable, whether they feel they can be open, or whether they feel they are vulnerable to criticism. Linked with this are power relations, which are inevitable, particularly when funding is involved. (ILAC, 2010)\" Partnerships offer three main opportunities to strengthen capacity for innovation and social learning:1. Complementary competencies: Achieving sustainable development requires that diverse partners pool their assets-such as specialized knowledge and human capital-under new institutional arrangements. The idea is to form multidisciplinary teams that are able to learn together across organizational and geographical boundaries (Lundy et al., 2005). 2. Increasing scale and reach: Partners are potential multipliers of new information and knowledge. They can help fuse new knowledge with current knowledge and increase its flow into research and development networks and communities, often in multiple languages.Effective partnerships are useful for positioning such knowledge in the wider market, for example, among policy makers (CGIAR, 2008).Resulting growth in the scale and reach of knowledge compensates for the initial costs of creating and facilitating partnerships.Working in broad, multidisciplinary and geographically dispersed partnerships is challenging, but this can contribute to greater institutional openness in terms of cultural and gender issues. Partnerships are especially useful for this purpose if participants share lessons and insights, thus contributing to the learning cycle in which mistakes and disappointments serve as a springboard for reflection and revision (Tennyson, 2003). What often happens instead is that partnerships remain at the periphery of institutional learning, and neither leadership nor individual partners share best practices (Smith and Chataway, 2009). Partnerships are often driven by personal relationships; researchers and stakeholders decide to work together because they know and trust one another and share a common vision and field of interest. More attention should be paid to ensuring that partnership behaviors, policies, strategies, and practices progress from the micro level of individuals to the meso level of the organization (Özgediz and Nambi, 1999).Given the urgency of the multiple challenges that agriculture faces today, partnerships focusing on eco-efficiency must quickly provide strategies that translate knowledge into action and offer solutions that are effective and easy to implement. The increasing complexity of partnerships poses a major challenge. The following sections provide insights on how partnerships for eco-efficiency can be made to work. farmer associations or groups (Ashby, 1985). As participants in research, farmers can better communicate their perspectives on what, where, and when to research and their criteria for success. Farmers thus engage in the codevelopment of knowledge, taking responsibility for decisions about priority setting, implementation, and recommendations (Cárdenas-Grajales, 2009).Participation in research is not to be confused with the discovery learning process used to teach farmers about recommended technologies. The latter is an extension method, in which farmers conduct their own experiments to demonstrate known principles and practices. In contrast, participatory research involves collaborative investigation of options for innovation, about which researchers are just as uncertain of the outcomes as are producers.Participatory research in agriculture evolved from participatory rapid appraisal in rural development projects to the application of similar techniques for the purposes of research. New methodologies soon followed, which national and international research centers used for participatory selection of experimental germplasm of grain legumes (Mazon et al., 2007), applied research in farmers' fields (CORPOICA, 2002), and research to develop and strengthen community organizations and their links with markets (CRS, 2007).To be effective, participatory research methods should be used in conjunction with social analysis. This is essential for determining who should participate, when, how, and where and also for ensuring that results are representative and can be generalized. In rice production, for example, achieving eco-efficiency implies very different outcomes for women who transplant rice, men who own rice paddy land, and ethnic minorities who want to preserve forests from encroachment by rice cultivation. The gender, ethnic identity, and social class of research participants must be investigated through social analysis to ensure that different groups in the intended beneficiary population are represented appropriately.Participatory methods have been applied in agriculture specifically for experimentation with farmers, participatory plant breeding, participatory technology development, participatory market appraisal, and communication for development.Participatory methods have been widely used for farmer experimentation in Latin America (Braun and Hocdé, 2003). One such experience involved a method centering on local agricultural research committees (or CIAL, its Spanish acronym). These are groups of volunteer farmers from a community or farmerExperience in Malawi with the evaluation of legumes for soil fertility improvement demonstrates the value of participatory technology evaluation. At first, farmers were averse to adopting legumes for this purpose, despite having serious soil fertility problems. But they adopted the practice enthusiastically after participatory technology evaluation helped researchers understand farmers' priorities. Testing with more than 3000 men and women farmers showed that they preferred edible species, such as pigeon pea and groundnut, over mucuna, a green manure crop that researchers had recommended.By 2001, 72% of the target farm population had adopted pigeon pea and groundnut, compared with only 15% the year before. Evaluations found that children were better nourished in households that had adopted the edible legumes. SOURCE: Kerr et al. (2007).strengthening in available tools through partnerships with universities and development agencies is an effective way to heighten awareness of this approach and strengthen capacity to use the tools available. Demand for this service is growing among national and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs), such as World Vision, and agencies such as Oxfam International and the World Food Programme. They are particularly interested in monitoring and evaluating the use of participatory methods to promote technological innovation as they shift emphasis from humanitarian relief to food production.• Climate change: To assist farmers in coping with the impacts of climate change, research must incorporate local knowledge. Participatory plant breeding, for example, can be used to develop crop varieties that are not only better adapted to harsher conditions but closely match farmers' other needs, providing broad genetic diversity and more-flexible seed systems.Making agriculture more eco-efficient involves choices based on value judgments about alternatives. Some options may have positive or negative implications or involve trade-offs between competing objectives and interests. For that reason, researchers must always ask, \"Efficiency for whom?\" Participatory research is one of several approaches that can help address this question. It is particularly useful for taking into account different perspectives and priorities when deciding what the research problems are and what constitutes an eco-efficient innovation. Understanding farmers' demands and limitations is essential for finding solutions that are feasible for participating farmers.The gold standard of research consists of publishing one or more articles in peer-reviewed journals aimed at a scientific audience, which may number in the thousands. Traditional development practice, on the other hand, focuses on solving problems for as many people as possible as quickly as possible. Its gold standard constitutes a favorable impact assessment, showing that a project has delivered considerable livelihood gains for the poor both in quantitative and qualitative terms.Somewhere along the continuum between these caricatures of research and development lies the current reality. The CGIAR has recently announced that it will focus more strongly on achieving research outcomes that are reflected in measurable improvement of rural livelihoods. Yet, the incentive structures still favor scientific outputs over development impact.Meanwhile, development practitioners have adopted various approaches to monitoring, evaluation, and learning in an effort to enhance performance. Learning alliances provide an institutional framework for facilitating more effective and consistent connections between research and development, as both strive to improve the lives of the rural poor.Learning alliances differ substantially from common training practices, especially those involving short, one-off courses. This approach involves rather an iterative learning process undertaken jointly by multiple stakeholders, with the aim of improving the learning and innovation capacity of agencies that support farmer associations. There are three types of learning alliances (Table 14- 2;Best et al., 2009).Partners in such collaboration need to agree on basic principles of collective work, including:• Clear objectives: These must reflect the needs, capacities, and interests of the participating organizations and individuals. What does each organization bring to the alliance? What complementarities or gaps exist? What does each organization hope to achieve through the collaboration? • Shared responsibilities, costs, and credit: A learning alliance seeks to benefit all parties, so costs, responsibilities, and proper credit for achievements should be shared among partners. • Outputs as inputs: Rural communities are diverse, and there are no universal recipes for sustainable development. In learning alliances, the outputs of research and development are viewed as inputs for rural innovation at specific places and times. The particular methods and tools employed may change, as users adapt these to their needs and circumstances. Key challenges are to understand the reasons for adaptation and its positive or negative impacts on livelihoods as well as to document and share lessons learned.Learning alliances involve diverse participants.Determining each group's willingness to participate in the learning process is critical to success. This requires flexible but connected learning methods, which range from participatory monitoring and evaluation through conventional impact assessment to the development of innovation histories.Rural development takes place over many years. To influence positive change and understand why change has occurred requires long-term, stable relationships capable of evolving to meet new challenges. Trust is the glue that binds these relationships.Under learning alliances, the learning process typically spans 12 to 24 months (Best et al., 2009). It involves learning cycles, which include feedback loops and opportunities for reflection and documentation aimed at improving practice. This approach consists of four interrelated learning strategies:1. Capacity building: This activity is not limited to training but focuses on practical application of methods in the field, follow-up, adaptation, and improvement. Partners receive ongoing support as they implement prototypes. This process is linked to specific learning cycles, which strengthen partners' ability to use specific tools and approaches, adapt them to their needs, and discern when particular methods might or might not be useful. 2. Targeted action research: Such research addresses specific knowledge gaps identified with partner agencies. Key research questions are identified and fieldwork designed and implemented collaboratively by research and development agencies. Outcomes and findings are shared with other partner agencies, selected decision makers, and the general public through workshops and in electronic formats.These aim at strengthening the relationships that form the basis of the learning alliance through densification of networks and personal connections. To achieve this, the alliance can use face-to-face meetings, training-andexchange visits, and virtual tools such as a web site and list server. 4. Evidence-based decision making: Aimed at influencing organizations in the public and private sectors, this strategy has been markedly less successful than the other three. Nonetheless, learning-alliance partners consider it to be critical for leveraging high-level change based on field results. Alliance partners learn primarily through a learning cycle for each topic of interest, as shown in Figure 14-2.The learning alliance model involves the following activities, themes, and challenges:• Identifying learning topics: Identifying and clearly articulating the content of a given learning cycle requires extensive discussion, which is often time consuming and may become acrimonious. Nonetheless, once the partners reach consensus, the result is a more effective learning cycle. A learning alliance in Central America for rural-enterprise development contributed to significant changes in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of 25 partner agencies, which influenced a network of 116 additional organizations. By 2007, the alliance had contributed to benefits for 33,000 rural families (about 175,000 people) in El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua.The alliance resulted in stronger networks with end users, involving both development actors and researchers. Partners changed from competitive to collaborative attitudes as they saw evidence that working together enhanced their capacity to meet the needs of rural communities and to obtain donor funds. These shifts, in turn, contributed to a more efficient innovation system for rural-enterprise development, as evidenced by shared use and generation of information, joint capacity building, and large-scale collaborative projects.A community-level assessment conducted in 2007 identified 30 cases that highlight the positive impact of methods and tools used by the learning alliance on income generation, natural resource management, and the role of women. On the strength of such results, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) adopted the learning-alliance approach within its global Agriculture and Environment Program. From small beginnings in East Africa and Central America during 2002-04, CRS has extended its learning alliances for agro-enterprise development to five regions involving about 30 countries (Best et al., 2009). The approach has also been adopted in the water and sanitation sector (Smits et al, 2007) and in India's rice sector (Prasad et al., 2007).In July 2009, the learning alliance in Central America entered a new phase. Five organizations that participated in its first phase-CRS, The Netherlands Development Organisation (SNV), the Swiss Foundation for Technical Cooperation (Swisscontact), OXFAM-GB, and the Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE, its Spanish acronym)-signed a five-year agreement to support a coordination unit that is currently facilitated by CATIE.For more information: www.alianzasdeaprendizaje.org learning-alliance partners must be accountable to one another as well as to their own stakeholders, and the partnership as a whole must be accountable to its stakeholders (APP, 2011). 4. Cultivate an organizational support network:It takes time and effort to build a shared learning culture. This is beyond the scope of a single project and requires ongoing support from staff and management in research and development organizations. To consolidate the learning culture requires a support network in both organizations, as it may run counter to short-term organizational thinking.Many challenges must be addressed to make learning alliances sustainable. Both research and development organizations need to make significant changes in attitudes and practices while also creating clear incentives for effective learning. These organizations should also assign higher value to emerging knowledge and insights, which do not easily fit in project logical frameworks or academic journals. And they must allow for more collaboration across research and development boundaries. In addition, better documentation and measurement of results in a consistent and statistically valid manner are needed to complement current efforts focused on qualitative changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills, and practices.The first round of learning alliances has provided useful lessons for the future, but important knowledge gaps remain. The overarching question is how to create and share knowledge within complex adaptive systems so that it contributes to sustained poverty reduction. Learning alliances and similar approaches provide opportunities to develop and test different hypotheses on this issue, which will remain an important concern for the foreseeable future.Project monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a systematic approach to learning and capacity strengthening that involves all stakeholders (IFAD, 2002). Monitoring is periodic oversight of project implementation that seeks to establish whether the production of outputs is proceeding according to plan. Evaluation attempts to determine as systematically and objectively as possible the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of activities in light of specified objectives. M&E is an action-oriented management tool and an organizational process for generating knowledge to improve decisions about policies, programs, and organizations (Horton et al., 2003).Achieving eco-efficient agriculture entails complex, long-term research. Its results must inform decision making and uptake in specific contexts while also informing further research (Watts et al., 2008). M&E encompasses all the channels and methods by which evidence is gathered, documented, and shared in research, including its conclusions and recommendations. M&E of research and the resulting international public goods provide crucial support for learning by doing and other types of learning that can enhance adaptive capacity (Douthwaite et al., 2003). Unfortunately, evaluation is often limited to the purpose of justifying past funding and obtaining future funding by demonstrating accountability and impacts, which may be disconnected from the intended users of research results.M&E and capacity strengthening are closely linked, as both emphasize learning in research for development. It is of paramount importance for organizations to promote an \"evaluative culture\" through investment in evaluation for learning. They can accomplish this by encouraging people to share best practices and lessons learned, by showing appreciation for attempts at reflection, by learning from multiple sources and perspectives, and by assessing constructively past mistakes or lost opportunities.To involve stakeholders in evaluation and through their participation to promote learning from and about evaluation should be standard practice in systemic research. Methods such as inclusive and use-focused evaluation produce better results and yield more-accurate recommendations for enhancing program development and change (Bledsoe and Graham, 2005).The main evaluation approaches currently in use are described briefly below, including comments on how M&E can be best organized and managed.With this approach-which is also known as program-theory evaluation, among other namesevaluation is based on an explicit theory or model of how programs may cause intended or observed outcomes (Rogers et al., 2000). Drawing on a synthesis of stakeholder program logic and social science theory, the approach defines what a program does and how, and gauges the effects of outputs on outcomes. This enables the evaluator to ascertain the actual causal mechanisms of program strategies and link these to changes in program participants.This approach combines self-assessment with external evaluation by peers (Thiele, 2007). The two are then discussed and compared for the purpose of improving learning, communication, and sharing.This is an action-oriented process through which stakeholders engage in monitoring or evaluation at various levels. They share control over the content, process, and results of M&E and engage in reflection, aimed at identifying corrective actions. PM&E provides ways to simplify complex plans through measurement frameworks that are owned by implementing partners. This approach not only measures the effectiveness of a project but also builds ownership of the content and promotes accountability for the outcomes at various levels (Muthoni, 2007).This is an umbrella term for a wide range of methodologies, such as participatory rural appraisal, rapid rural appraisal, participatory learning methods, participatory action research, farming systems research, active method of research and participatory planning (MARP, its French acronym), and many others. The common theme in all these approaches is the full participation of people in learning about their needs and opportunities, and about actions required to address them.Recent evaluation methods go beyond a focus on outputs (for the sake of accountability) to examine outcomes, particularly the extent to which they reach intended users. Such methods are concerned with the impacts triggered among target groups of users during and after an intervention.A method referred to as utilization-focused evaluation, for example, begins with the premise that evaluations should be judged by their utility (Patton, 1996). This method centers completely on the group of intended users and on the use they make of the information collected through the evaluation. Another option is outcome mapping, which does not assess the products of a program but rather focuses on changes in the behavior, relationships, and actions of the people, groups, and organizations directly involved. Then there is participatory impact pathways analysis-a planning, monitoring, and evaluation approach developed for complex projects in the water and food sectors (Álvarez et al., 2010). These M&E methods are not yet part of standard practice in international agricultural research. However, they could gain currency if continued use demonstrates their value convincingly and if scientists adopt more widely the \"innovation systems\" view of agricultural research for development, as opposed to the more common linear model.Measuring research impact in a credible manner is a time-consuming and resource-intensive activity that requires specialized skills as well as research on new methodologies (CGIAR Science Council, 2009).When M&E is done in a participatory manner focused on outcomes and learning, it can provide research managers with much useful information on the efficiency, relevance, sustainability, impact, and effectiveness of work in progress (Guijt, 1999). It can also contribute to adaptive management and improvement of a program, making it more relevant to users. The information derived from M&E offers research a \"bigger picture\" that reflects the complexity of any agricultural intervention. Through a continuous, inclusive, and wellorganized information exchange and learning, M&E can strengthen partners' ownership of an intervention, thus increasing the chances of adoption and sustainability.The way ahead for M&E in agricultural research concerned with eco-efficiency must involve a shift from summative evaluation driven by accountability concerns to M&E cultures and practices that are formative, inclusive, and systemic. Given growing pressures on funding and the urgency of addressing food insecurity, agricultural research must combine traditional impact assessment with more-timely, affordable, and inclusive ways of learning for the future.This section underlines the contribution that knowledge management can make in strengthening capacity to make tropical agriculture more eco-efficient. It first summarizes somePABRA is a CIAT-supported research partnership that improves the productivity and nutritional quality of beans, with the aim of improving the incomes, nutrition, and food security of the rural and urban poor. PABRA employs an inclusive M&E system that reflects the complementarities and synergies that are inherent in a partnership involving national agricultural research institutes, other government organizations, NGOs, extension service providers, and the private sector.Based on the principles of PM&E, the PABRA system actively engages different partner groups in defining what will be evaluated, who will take part, when evaluation will take place, what quantitative and qualitative methods will be used to collect and analyze information, and how findings will be consolidated.A PM&E facilitator guides the group through the generation of a results framework and measurement plan and also manages the group dynamics and social and political issues that arise when stakeholders having different information needs, priorities, and expectations are all involved in M&E. Some of the immediate results are a mutually defined framework for results-based management (RBM) in the form of a program logic model; a performance measurement framework, which provides guidelines for monitoring results; and review processes organized as workshops and fora.These results provide PABRA with a platform that enables other partners in the region and beyond to participate in the alliance. PABRA's RBM framework also accommodates projects funded by specific donors, such as the work of the Sub-Saharan Africa Challenge Program on developing market, gender, and institutional arrangements for integrated research for development.PABRA's social environment facilitates the introduction of new technologies and other innovations; its stakeholders are more tolerant of new ideas that emerge from discussions of research results and lessons learned. PABRA's member countries find it easy to replicate successful implementation of technologies and methods in other countries, thus boosting the rate at which innovations are taken up across the region.Approaches such as participatory variety selection and private-public partnerships aimed at widening access to improved seed are still relatively new to the national institutions that are PABRA members. But some countries have quickly come to value and adopt these approaches based on reviews of case studies and lessons learned. general trends in knowledge management and then looks into various aspects and applications of knowledge management and sharing as well as their respective tools and methods. These include:(1) participatory research communication and documentation; (2) open access to research outputs as well as to broadband telecommunications channels; (3) research project collaboration; and (4) information and communications technologies for development (ICTs4D).Organizations engaged in research for development are necessarily knowledge organizations. Their core business is to combine primary information-data-with experience, context, interpretation, and reflection to generate what has been referred to as \"tacit\" knowledge (Nonaka, 1994). This knowledge is intended to help users make better-informed decisions and take appropriate actions.Recent trends in knowledge management suggest that this is no longer a top-down process but rather has become a participatory activity, in which the role of management is to \"make it possible for staff to act as the managers of their knowledge\" (Wenger, 2004). Knowledge management has thus shifted from a managerial and technology-heavy discipline to one that centers on learning by doing and collective reflection and innovation (Hall, 2006). This shift has profound implications for the relevance of knowledge management to issues such as sustainability and equity in research for development. It has also created new opportunities to reach the intended users of new knowledge.Technology changes people's behavior, and new behaviors, in turn, create new contexts for technological innovation. Much the same thing happens with knowledge management.The International Telecommunication Union (ITU, 2010) states that continuous improvement in connectivity has turned the internet into a generalpurpose technology like electricity. By 2010, two billion people had access to the internet, and five billion had mobile phone subscriptions. This has created new opportunities for providing broad access to scientific knowledge around the world. Even so, significant barriers remain, such as a lack of content in multiple languages and limited access to broadband infrastructure.Improved connectivity has also given rise to significant progress in technology-enabled human interactivity, providing new possibilities for the online co-creation, discussion, and promotion of content across organizational and geographical boundaries. The emergence of web 2.0 technologies has created an unprecedented entry point for practicing horizontal and decentralized communication and collaborative learning, which are crucial for multistakeholder and network-based activities such as agricultural research for development.But not all knowledge management happens virtually. On the contrary, much experience and many studies suggest that face-to-face communication is crucial for creating new types of collegial relationships and fostering more-creative scientific collaboration because it creates the trust and other conditions needed for effective flow of knowledge among teams and partners (Staiger et al., 2005).The scientific community has not been quick to pick up on the opportunities created by these trends. Rather, it continues to rely on a few, traditional vehicles for sharing and validating new knowledge that involve relatively poor interaction. The most important of these are experiment replication, publication of research results in peer-reviewed journals, literature searches, and formal communication at conferences and workshops.Many scientists worry that more open and rapid sharing of research under way might not only undermine the quality of its outputs but also make it impossible to publish the results in peer-reviewed journals. These still constitute the ultimate proof of high-quality science and therefore strongly influence researchers' incentives. However, there are many promising paths for combining traditional and Communication units and staff have to acquire new skills so as to incorporate social-media practices and tools into their day-to-day work and promote these among staff and partners, with explicit support from management.Although the scientific outputs of public international research are considered global public goods, access to them may be limited for various reasons. The information may not be available in public repositories; access to it may be blocked by the copyright restrictions of peer-reviewed journals; or key information may not be available in the languages of intended users (Arivananthan et al., 2010).Access to research outputs is the first condition for learning and capacity strengthening. The Coherence in Information for Agricultural Research for Development (CIARD) initiative indicates useful pathways and provides step-by-step guides for creating favorable institutional conditions (such as licensing) for collecting and preserving research outputs (e.g., through digitization of older outputs and use of digital repositories) and for making content widely accessible on the web (e.g., through \"self-archiving,\" which allows for publishing of a preprint or postprint of scientific papers submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals or conference and workshop proceedings).Easy access to information further depends on Information Technology (IT) infrastructure and broadband internet access. Improvements in these areas can make the internet available to all staff of an organization, better enabling them to promote its products and achievements. To create entry points for open access requires corresponding institutional policies and incentives.Working in multidisciplinary global partnerships requires a change in individual computer work habits. Online collaborative tools (such as Google applications and wikis) and practices can be used to share work in progress, encourage regular feedback, and improve the use and reuse of information as well as to create and facilitate online communities. Recent experience demonstrates that these practices support the emergence of an ongoing learning process (Staiger-Rivas et al., 2009). They enhance team integration, engagement, and involvement and ultimately research impact. The organizational benefits include staff empowerment, increased transparency, and stronger internal capacity, which should contribute to organizational development and change.Whether collaborative tools thrive in an organization depends on several key factors. IT support services must be open to software solutions that are non-proprietary and must move to a technology stewardship role (Wenger et al., 2009). The adoption of collaborative online tools requires patience and careful facilitation of the change in work habits. Before collaborative web tools are introduced, their purpose must be clearly identified, and the key people involved must understand and agree with their use.The emergence of the internet made possible widespread use of new ICTs4D, based on the principle of connectivity as a powerful means of inclusion (www.ictinagriculture.org). The spread of mobile phones is rapidly overcoming barriers to access. According to ITU (2010), 86% of the world's population is covered by a mobile phone network, and 75% of the world's rural population is covered by a mobile phone signal.The tools and possible applications for agriculture are limitless, including market information and financial services, land administration and risk management, advisory services, decentralized data collection, and many more. ICTs4D should contribute importantly to eco-efficiency in agriculture by providing smallholder farmers with inexpensive access to information that can help make their production more productive and competitive.However, as often occurs with the introduction of new technology, adoption of ICTs4D has been hindered by flaws in the approach used. Initial efforts have focused too much on IT infrastructure and on access to hardware and have taken a top-down approach to information diffusion.In order for projects involving ICTs4D to be more effective, they must meet several conditions (Rogers, 2011). First, the application must be relevant to the local context and correspond to local needs. Second, the available IT infrastructure capacity must be well understood. Third, steps must be taken from the start to ensure sustainability. And finally, applications must be developed in a participatory manner, focusing on what farmers have to offer, avoiding condescending assumptions, and providing opportunities for social learning.In research centering on eco-efficient agriculture, ICTs4D should be a key focus for the development of applications that facilitate the creation and use of new knowledge. Several organizational changes are required to promote a knowledge-sharing culture:• A clear commitment to horizontal forms of management and related incentives. Hierarchical handling of communications and decision making, in contrast, keeps staff from discussing research for development openly and learning from peers. • A sustained effort to promote changes in national and regional research organizations that enhance knowledge flow between stakeholders, based on shared values and knowledge management practices. • A shift in the orientation of IT personnel away from technology control and towards technology stewardship, aimed at helping users choose the best technologies, including those needed to foster knowledge sharing.These changes are critical for strengthening capacity to achieve eco-efficient agriculture through active knowledge management and sharing in research for development.This chapter has examined various approaches by which stakeholders can mainstream eco-efficiency in the agricultural development agenda. To achieve this transformation will require a multidisciplinary effort to build innovation capacity through joint learning and stakeholder empowerment.One of the chapter's key assumptions is the need for a systemic approach to research for development that acknowledges the complexity of research and of the interactions between those involved. Creating the institutional arrangements needed for such an approach is a huge challenge. How can organizations incorporate the notion of eco-efficiency into their work? How can they learn and adapt continuously? How can they handle complex processes and interactions efficiently? How can they walk their talk? Horton (2012) spells out the institutional changes that are required: Becoming a learning organization frequently requires:• Shifting from closed innovation strategies to more open ones • Shifting from simple, hierarchical organizational designs to more complex ones that feature multidisciplinary teamwork and multiorganizational collaboration • Shifting from traditional planning and implementation systems to adaptive management • Expanding evaluation functions to encompass both accountability and learning • Incorporating societal concerns and priorities into performance incentives.As agricultural research organizations begin to mainstream eco-efficiency, they can start by examining their internal capacities, policies, administrative processes, incentive structures, and other organizational arrangements. Suggested steps are to:• Develop a good understanding of eco-efficiency internally through training, workshops, field visits, and seminars. • Adopt appropriate business practices and policies, such as carbon-footprint standards and eco-efficient practices in office-space design, renovation, construction, landscaping, and supply-chain management.• Widen staff skills to include new capacities in areas such as facilitation, mentoring, networking, and social media. These are essential for working with diverse stakeholders to identify and develop new opportunities for technical and institutional innovation (Horton, 2012). • Use monitoring and evaluation methods and tools for learning and adaption in conjunction with traditional approaches centering on accountability and return on investment. • Design incentives (such as appraisal criteria, competitions, rewards, and small grants) to promote teamwork, open knowledge sharing, and a practical focus on development results. • Allow for adaptive management (Horton, 2012) in terms of planning, budgeting, reporting, and career development.Organizations that take these steps can strengthen their capacity for innovation through a combination of bottom-up and top-down approaches, involving dialogue between staff, partners, and other stakeholders. Such organizations can learn from past experience and make better decisions that focus their research more sharply on development outcomes, leading to eco-efficient agriculture. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1350822206.json b/main/part_2/1350822206.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..904e09851fa8bb8f54d9a0d99ffef4dfe6b83c5e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1350822206.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"907ed0d83c2c9a6937e2290378f33403","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9867fbd2-3dba-4d4e-9383-b9fd66cb3d85/retrieve","id":"-1598157865"},"keywords":["climate-smart agriculture","earthworms","soil enzymes","subsurface drip irrigation","maizebased system","rice-wheat system","soil quality"],"sieverID":"fd2dea3a-5ccd-42f2-b53e-f11db2eb79e0","content":"Earthworms (EWs) could be a viable indicator of soil biology and agri-food system management. The influence of climate-smart agriculture (CSA)-based sustainable intensification practices (zero tillage, crop rotations, crop residue retention, and precision water and nutrients application) on earthworms' (EWs) populations and soil physico-biochemical properties of rice-wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic plains of South Asia was investigated. This study investigates the effect of 10-years adoption of various CSA practices on the abundance of earthworms and physical and biochemical properties of the soil and EWs' casts (EWC). Five scenarios (Sc) were included: conventionally managed rice-wheat system (farmers' practices, Sc1), CSA-based rice-wheat-mungbean system with flood irrigation (FI) (Sc2) and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) (Sc3), CSA-based maizewheat-mungbean system with FI (Sc4), and SDI (Sc5). Results revealed that EWs were absent under Sc1, while the 10-year adoption of CSA-based scenarios (mean of Sc2-5) increased EWs' density and biomass to be 257.7 no. m −2 and 36.05 g m −2 , respectively. CSA-based maize scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) attained higher EWs' density and biomass over rice-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4). Also, SDI-based scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) recorded higher EWs' density and biomass over FI (Sc2 and Sc4). Maize-based CSA with SDI recorded the highest EWs' density and EWs' biomass. The higher total organic carbon in EWC (1.91%) than in the bulk soil of CSA-based scenarios (0.98%) and farmers' practices (0.65%) suggests the shift of crop residue to a stable SOC (in EWC). EWC contained significant amounts of C and available NPK under CSA practices, which were nil under Sc1. All CSA-based scenarios attained higher enzymes activities over Sc1. CSA-based scenarios, in particular, maize-based scenarios using SDI, improved EWs' proliferation, SOC, and nutrients storage (in soil and EWC) and showed a better choice for the IGP farmers with respect to C sequestration, soil quality, and nutrient availability.The rice-wheat (RW) cropping system dominates in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of South Asia covering an area of 13.5 Mha [1]. Besides being high water, energy, labor, and fertilizers demanding cropping system, burning crop residues, and intensive tillage Agronomy 2022, 12, 658 2 of 24 practices contributed to soil degradation [2][3][4][5]. Consequently, the sustainability of the RW cropping system in the IGP of South Asia is under threat [6], promoting the need for better agri-food systems management practices [7]. Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices could enhance soil properties through the adoption of zero tillage (ZT), crop residue retention (CRR), and crop diversification [8][9][10] with best-fit crop management technologies [5,[11][12][13]. Despite the positive impacts of CSA practices on cropping system productivity, profitability, and resource use efficiency in the IGP of India, little information is available about the combined effects of CSA practices on the abundance of earthworms (EWs) and soil physico-biochemical properties.Conventional farming practices not only influence soil physico-biochemical properties but also intensively reduce the population, diversity, and activity of soil fauna [4,14]. The protection of soil fauna has a key role in soil management that determines soil quality [15]. Among organisms, soil properties are more amplified by EWs' abundance and activity than other soil fauna [16]. EWs' abundance was found to influence soil biophysical properties [17], crop productivity [18], and agroecosystem health [19]. EWs' feeding, burrowing, and casting activities impact OM distribution and dynamics [20], soil structure formation, aggregate stability, and soil porosity [21,22], nutrient availability and cycling [18,20,23], water infiltration [24], and microbial activity [25], thereby crop growth and productivity [18,23]. Consequently, due to the numerous ecosystem services that EWs provide, it was identified as ecosystem engineers [26,27] that could act as a bioindicator of land use and management [20,28].In general, EWs' density, diversity, and biomass in arable lands are lesser compared to gardens [14,29], organic farming [30], and integrated farming [28]. Several meta-analyses [22,30] and reviews [23,31] concluded that tillage reduces EWs' abundance. Moreover, EWs' abundance and diversity are influenced by crop residues amount and type [15,19,29] and cropping rotation [20]. Indeed, numerous studies have shown that CRR, ZT, and crop diversity positively affect EWs' population [24,27,32]. However, the layering of such practices on EWs' abundance in intensively irrigated rice-wheat cropping systems is limited.Soil biological properties, carbon mineralization, and nutrient release are strongly related. Earthworms primarily decompose low-quality OM to a nutrient-rich product by establishing a mutualistic relationship with soil microflora [32]. Accordingly, changes in EWs' density and activity could be manifested by increased nutrient levels and enzyme activities [14]. Enzymes, proteins produced by plant roots, soil microbiota, and fauna to hydrolyze SOM, are responsive to the soil management practices, e.g., tillage, cropping diversity, residue, and nutrient management [4,[33][34][35]. Due to their relationship with soil biology, soil enzymes have been described as \"biological fingerprints\", considered key soil quality indicators [36] that catalyze various reactions for OM decomposition, and OM-and nutrient cycling [37,38]. For example, phosphatases play roles in the organic Phosphorus (P) bioavailability [39], while dehydrogenase (DHA) plays a role in the oxidation of SOM by shifting organic H to inorganic acceptors [40]. In brief, DHA activity reflects a good picture of the overall soil microbial activities, thus it is a viable soil health indicator [41]. Hence, the effect of CSA and EWs' activity might be reflected by nutrient levels and enzyme activities in both bulk soil and EWs' casts (EWC).The nature of retained crop residues and EWs' abundance has produced contradictory results. While OM supply usually increases EWs' populations [42], Bamminger et al., [43] found no effect. Additionally, not always the adoption of sustainably managed systems promotes EWs' abundance [22,44]. More importantly, the effect of EWs on SOC is found ambiguous [45], as EWs influence SOC in two different directions [46]. EWs could accelerate crop residues decomposition by promoting microbial activity [33,47]. However, EWs' activity could increase SOC levels by boosting the formation of stable aggregates that protect the SOC against microbial attack [48,49] and by stabilizing the newly added OM in their casts, thus aiding soil C storage in the long term [25,46,48,50]. Therefore, the impact of retaining various crop residues under conservative managed systems on the EWs' abundance and their impact on SOC sequestration and soil quality in the IGP is important in light of global warming.In northern India, studies revealed the anthropogenic pressure on EWs' communities in arable lands [4,28,29]. Despite researchers confirming the ultimate beneficial effects of CSA in the IGP of India, little information is available about the effects of various CSA practices on the EWs' density and biomass. We hypothesize that CSA-based sustainable intensification practices (zero tillage, crop rotations, crop residue retention, and precision water and nutrients application) would augment EWs' populations that could enhance soil physico-biochemical properties than conventional practices, which could vary as per the cropping system management practices. In the present study, after a decade of adopting various CSA practices, we measured EWs' density and biomass in two soil layers (0-15 and 15-30 cm), as well the soil physical properties and the biochemical properties of both the bulk soil and EWs' casts. The CSA practices were compared with farmers' practices. CSA practices involved tillage (zero tillage Vs intensive tillage), crop rotations (maize-wheat vs rice-wheat), crop residue management (retention Vs removal), and water and nutrients application (precision application via subsurface irrigation vs flood irrigation). The effect of different management practices and their linear contrast on the above-mentioned parameters were analyzed. The results of these studies could help in designing a better cropping system with the best CSA practices that could show a better choice for the IGP farmers with respect to EWs' proliferation, C sequestration, nutrients storage, and availability, and soil physical and biological properties.The experiment was conducted at the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (CSSRI), Karnal (29 • 42 20.7 N latitude, 76 • 57 19.79 E longitude, 243 m elevation), India. This area is typically known for the rice-wheat (RW) system. The climate of the region is semi-arid subtropical with an average rainfall of 670 mm annually, of which ~80% is distributed mainly from June to September (monsoon season). The climate is characterized by three distinctive seasons, i.e., wet-Kharif (July-October), dry-Rabi (November-March), and summer-Zaid (April-June). The soil of the experimental site is silty loam in texture (34.0% sand, 46.0% silt, and 20.0% clay), slightly alkaline (pH of 8.0), and poor in organic carbon content (0.45%).This study included five treatments (hereinafter named scenarios) consisting of two cropping systems (rice-wheat and maize-wheat) with combinations of tillage, residue management, crop establishment, mungbean integration, and water management practices (Table 1). The treatments were designated as scenarios by keeping in view present management practices, as well as future drivers of agricultural changes in the region. Before initiating the experiment, the experimental site was under a conventionally managed ricewheat system. The experiment began in 2009 and was laid out in a randomized complete block design and replicated thrice in 20 m × 50 m plot size. The five scenarios (Sc) were: conventional tillage (CT)-puddled transplanted rice (PTR) -CT wheat with flood irrigation (FI) (Sc1; farmers' practice); ZT direct-seeded rice (DSR) -ZT wheat -ZT mungbean with FI (Sc2); ZT DSR -ZT wheat -ZT mungbean with subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) (Sc3); ZT maize -ZT wheat -ZT mungbean with FI (Sc4) and ZT Maize -ZT Wheat -ZT mungbean with SDI (Sc5). Details of all CSA-based management scenarios comprised of crop rotation, tillage, crop establishment, and residue and water management are given in Table 1. In all the scenarios, similar management practices were followed across the years. A sampling of soil and EWs was carried out during the year 2019 (after 10 years of adopting CSA practices). All crop residues were removed in farmers' practice (Sc1) from the ground level. However, in rice-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3), all rice and mungbean residues and anchored wheat residues were retained on the soil surface. In maize-based CAS scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5), partial (~65%) maize residues and anchored wheat stubbles were retained at the soil surface. To assess the amount of crop residue recycled in each scenario, five rows with a length of 1.0 m were sampled from three locations in each plot after the harvest of each crop. The residues were cut from the soil surface, oven-dried, and expressed on a dry weight basis per hectare. The average residue load varied from 7.36-7.75 Mg ha −1 for rice, 9.52-9.88 Mg ha −1 for maize, 1.85-1.97 Mg ha −1 for wheat, and 2.95-3.30 Mg ha −1 for mungbean over the years. Annual average crop residues of 12.29, 12.39, 14.78, and 14.33 Mg ha −1 were retained on the soil surface for Scenario 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The C/N ratio of rice and maize was 58-65 and 43-50, respectively, and for wheat and mungbean, 50-56 and 20-30, respectively.In Sc1 (farmers' practice), conventional irrigation practices were applied; for CT-PTR, flood irrigation (FI) of ~5 cm depth for one month followed by irrigation applied at the hairline crack, while needs-based FI was applied for wheat (Table 1). In CSA-based scenarios, irrespective of the irrigation system (e.g., FI for Sc2 and Sc4 and SDI for Sc3 and Sc5), irrigation was based on a soil matric potential (SMP) of −20 to −30 kPa for rice and −40 to −50 kPa for maize throughout the season. The only exception is rice in Sc2, in which the soil was kept wet for the first 20 days to ensure good germination and establishment (Table 1). However, in the case of mungbean, needs-based irrigation was applied. Within each plot, a soil tensiometer \"gauge-type\" (IRROMETER, Riverside, California) was installed to monitor SMP. The ceramic cups were placed at 15 cm depth, ensuring good contact between the ceramic tip and the surrounding soil. The subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) system was installed; polyvinyl chloride pipes having an inside diameter of 90 and 63 mm for mains and sub mains, respectively. The laterals were placed at depth of 20 cm using tractor operated drip laying machine. Dripping lines (16 mm in diameter) were laid down along the rows at 20 cm depth with in-line emitters with a flow rate of 2.0 L h −1 and located 30 cm apart and the distance between dripping lines was 67.5 cm.In Sc1 (farmers' practice), both rice and wheat were cultivated as common farmers' practices in northwest India. The tillage operations in conventional till puddled transplanted rice (CT-PTR) comprised of two passes of harrow, one pass of rotavator, and two passes of puddle harrow followed by planking. Twenty-five-days-old rice seedlings were manually transplanted in a random geometry (20 cm × 15 cm) in puddled fields. In CT wheat, preparatory tillage included two passes each of harrowing, and two cultivators then wheat seeds were manually broadcasted and followed by planking. In CSA scenarios (Sc2-5), under ZT, all crops (rice, wheat, mungbean) except maize were planted with a row spacing of 22.5 cm using Happy Seeder; while maize was seeded at a row spacing of 67.5 cm. For CT (PTR) and DSR rice, a seed rate of 10 and 20 kg ha −1 were used, respectively. For maize, wheat, and mungbean, a seed rate of 100, 20, and 20 kg ha −1 was used, respectively. The best management practices were followed for weed, insect, pest, and disease management as per the recommendations of Punjabi Agricultural University.Soil bulk density was measured following the core method [51]. The soil penetration resistance was measured using a manual cone penetrometer (Eijkelkamp Agrisearch Equipment, Germany) at a 5 cm interval to a depth of 0-30 cm. The infiltration rate (IR) was determined using a double-ring infiltrometer as described by Gathala et al. [52]. The mean weight diameter (MWD) of water-stable soil aggregates was determined using the wet sieving method [53]. An air-dry soil sample of 100 g was passed through an 8 mm sieve and transferred in a set of sieves with diameters of 4, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 mm. After which, sieves (including the soil) were soaked for 10 min for capillary rewetting, followed by 10 min of shaking in a water drum with an oscillation frequency of 30 cycles min −1 and an amplitude of 3 cm, resulting in distinct aggregate class diameters, i.e., 0-0.125, 0.125-0.25, 0.25-0.5, 0.5-1, 1-2, 2-4 and 4-8 mm. The aggregates that remained in each class were collected and oven-dried at 65-70 • C until a constant weight was recorded. The aggregates MWD was calculated according to Kemper and Rosenau [54] using the following equation.where, n is the number of fractions (0.1-0.25, 0.25-0.5, 0.5-1.0, 1.0-2.0, 2.0-4 and 4-8 mm), xi is the mean diameter (mm) of the sieve size class (0.175, 0.375, 0.75, 1.5 and 2.0, 3, and 6 mm), and wi is the weight of soil (g) retained on each sieve.Sampling was performed for EWs in the morning (during their active period) [29] during mid-September 2019, using the digging and hand sorting method for two soil depths, i.e., 0-15 and 15-30 cm, from each replicate with three grid points. Soil blocks (0.25 cm × 25 cm × 15 cm) were removed from each plot. Similarly, soil blocks at a depth of 15-30 cm were sampled [55]. Soil blocks were bagged and directly moved to the laboratory and hand sorted. EWs were sorted into three categories based on their length, e.g., small (<20 mm), medium (20-40 mm), and large (>40 mm). The fresh biomass (g m −2 ) and density (No. m −2 ) were determined for each size category.Soil samples were collected (mid-September 2019) from each plot with three grid points from 0-15 cm depth using an auger with an internal diameter of 5 cm from each replicate. The activity of EWs is usually higher at night and therefore EWC was collected from the upper soil surface within a sampling area of 25 cm × 25 cm early in the morning using a brush and a small spoon [14]. Part of the fresh soil and EWC samples were kept (separately) in a refrigerator at 4 • C till the analysis of enzyme activities, i.e., dehydrogenase activity (DHA), alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP), and acid phosphatase activity (ACP). The other part of soil and EWC samples were air-dried, ground, sieved through a 2 mm sieve, and stored in a plastic jar for laboratory analysis of selected chemical properties.Soil and EWC were analyzed for electrical conductivity (EC), pH, total organic carbon (TOC), available N, P, and K, and enzymes (DHA, ALP, and ACP). EC and pH were determined in soil water extract (1 soil: 2 water) following the methods of Jakson [56]. The TOC content was determined using the wet oxidation method [57]. Available N was determined by the alkaline permanganate method [58]. Available P was determined by the ascorbic acid reductant method of Olsen et al. [59]. Available K was measured by flame photometer using neutral 1 N ammonium acetate extractant as described by Jackson [56]. Enzymes (DHA, ALP, and ACP) activities were estimated as described by Dick et al. [37].Data on earthworm population density, biomass weight, chemical properties of EWC, and soil had a greater coefficient of variation than 20%, and hence were transformed through a square-root ( √ x + 0.5) method [60]. The data were subjected to ANOVA (analysis of variance) using a one-way completely randomized design in the Glmmix procedure in SAS 9.1. The significant effect was determined at a significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05) and was compared according to Fisher's least significant difference (LSD). Principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation matrix were carried out using the R package GEA-R. The results were submitted to PCA to determine the common relationships between parameters.For All CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5), EWs' density and biomass of the three size categories (small, medium, and large) were higher in the surface soil layer (0-15 cm), compared to the subsurface soil layer (15-30 cm) (Table 2). However, for farmers' practices (Sc1), EWs' density and biomass were nil across the tested soil depths. For the two tested soil layers, all CSA-based scenarios had a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher total EWs' density and biomass compared with Sc1 (farmers' practices) and the increase varied with different crop-based scenarios. Across the two soil layers, CSA-based maize scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in EWs' density and biomass (across all size categories) (Table 2). Similarly, CSA rice-based scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3) did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in EWs' density and biomass across all size categories. The only exception is the medium size (20-40 mm), only in 15-30 cm soil depth, in which an EW density of Sc3 was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher than Sc2. In the top 15 cm soil depth, Sc5 recorded maximum EWs' density and biomass across all size categories, in which total EWs' density and biomass were 257.7 indv. m −2 and 36.05 g m −2 , respectively, instead of nil under Sc1. However, in sub-surface soil depth (15-30 cm), maximum EWs' density and biomass were recorded for Sc4 that was at par with Sc5.Total EWs' density and biomass were significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher in maize-based CSA scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) than rice-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3), in particular for the surface soil layer (Table 2). Maize-based CSA scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) recorded higher total EWs' density and biomass by 76.3, 240.0% and 56.0 and 52.0%, respectively, over ricebased CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3), for the surface and subsurface soil layers, respectively, irrespective of system management (tillage, irrigation, and CRR). Similarly, precise water and N management through SDI (Sc3 and Sc5) recorded significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher EWs' density (p ≤ 0.05) and biomass (p ≤ 0.01) by 25.0 and 39.12%, respectively, relative to flood irrigation (FI)-based scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4) for the surface soil layer, irrespective of the cropping system. In the sub-surface soil depth, no differences were observed due to the irrigation system. Within the CSA rice-based scenarios, the SDI-irrigated rice (Sc3) recorded a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher EWs' density and biomass by 5.86% and 48.48%, respectively over FI-irrigated rice (Sc2) for the 0-15 cm soil depth. Similarly, within maizebased scenarios, the SDI-irrigated maize (Sc5) recorded significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher EWs' density and biomass by 37.5 and 36.5%, respectively, over FI-irrigated maize (Sc4) for the 0-15 cm depth.The CSA practices significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected soil BD, which ranged from 1.4 Mg m −3 (Sc5) to 1.54 Mg m −3 (Sc1) (Figure 1). Soil BD of farmers' practices scenario was 7.8% higher than the CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5). Full CSA-based scenarios did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in BD (Figure 1). However, maize-based CSA scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower BD compared to Sc1; while rice-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3), did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ from Sc1. Compared to Sc1, CSA-based maize and rice scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.05) decreased BD by 9.7 and 5.2%, respectively, irrespective of crop management practices. Interestingly, the effect of the irrigation system on soil BD was minimal, in which both SDI-based scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) and FI-based scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4) showed similar BD. 1). Pars with a similar lowercase letter (s) are not significantly different at 0.05 level of probability using Tukey's HSD test. Letters apply only within each parameter.The infiltration rate (IR) of all CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5) was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher than Sc1 (Figure 1). No significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in IR were observed among CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5). Irrespective of crop type and management, IR of CSA was 3.5 and 3.0 times over Sc1 for rice-based CSA scenarios and maize-based CSA scenarios, respectively. On a system basis, rice-based CSA scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased the IR rate by 15.4% compared to maize-based CSA scenarios, irrespective of the irrigation system. The IR of SDI-based scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher than FI-based scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4) by 3.8%.The CSA-based scenario did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in the MWD and was significantly higher than farmer practice (Sc1). The CSA-based scenario (average of Sc2-5) increased MWD significantly (p ≤ 0.05) by 159%, irrespective of crop type and management practices (Figure 1). Summing the data over the cropping system, the results revealed that maize-based CSA scenarios showed statistically similar MWD to those recorded for rice-based CSA scenarios, irrespective of crop management (tillage, irrigation, and CRR). While SDI-based CSA scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) increased the MWD significantly (p ≤ 0.05) by 6.5% over SDI-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4), irrespective of the cropping system. 1). Pars with a similar lowercase letter (s) are not significantly different at 0.05 level of probability using Tukey's HSD test. Letters apply only within each parameter.The infiltration rate (IR) of all CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5) was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher than Sc1 (Figure 1). No significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in IR were observed among CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5). Irrespective of crop type and management, IR of CSA was 3.5 and 3.0 times over Sc1 for rice-based CSA scenarios and maize-based CSA scenarios, respectively. On a system basis, rice-based CSA scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased the IR rate by 15.4% compared to maize-based CSA scenarios, irrespective of the irrigation system. The IR of SDI-based scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher than FI-based scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4) by 3.8%.The CSA-based scenario did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in the MWD and was significantly higher than farmer practice (Sc1). The CSA-based scenario (average of Sc2-5) increased MWD significantly (p ≤ 0.05) by 159%, irrespective of crop type and management practices (Figure 1). Summing the data over the cropping system, the results revealed that maize-based CSA scenarios showed statistically similar MWD to those recorded for rice-based CSA scenarios, irrespective of crop management (tillage, irrigation, and CRR). While SDI-based CSA scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) increased the MWD significantly (p ≤ 0.05) by 6.5% over SDI-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4), irrespective of the cropping system.CSA-based scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.05) influenced SPR at all measured depths, except at 0-5 cm and 15-20 cm, in which no significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were observed among all scenarios (Figure 2). In general, in the top 15 cm, minimum SPR was recorded for Sc1 (0.64-0.91 MPa), while the highest values were recorded for Sc4 (0.87-1.83 MPa). Below 15 cm, an opposite trend was observed, in which CSA-based scenarios had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower SPR relative to Sc1. The effect of CSA was minimal in the upper 5 cm surface, in which no significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences were observed among all scenarios (Figure 2). In the 5-10 and 10-15 cm soil depths, all CSA-based scenarios significantly increased SPR except Sc3 which was at par with Sc1 (Figure 2). The threshold point was at a soil depth of 15-20 cm, wherein CSA practices did not significantly affect SPR. In the 20-25 and 25-30 cm soil depths, all CSA scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased SPR (Figure 2), with Sc3 (rice-based CSA with SDI) having the lowest SPR (0.97-1.2 MPa). The average SPR of maize-based CSA scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) was 5.0 and 39.6%, over rice-based CSA scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5), for the 0-15 and 15-30 cm soil depth, respectively. Moreover, ios (Figure 2). In the 5-10 and 10-15 cm soil depths, all CSA-based scenarios significantly increased SPR except Sc3 which was at par with Sc1 (Figure 2). The threshold point was at a soil depth of 15-20 cm, wherein CSA practices did not significantly affect SPR. In the 20-25 and 25-30 cm soil depths, all CSA scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased SPR (Figure 2 Values with a similar lowercase letter (s) with in each soil depth are not significantly different at 0.05 level of probability using Tukey's HSD test. (for a detailed description of scenarios refer to Table 1).The effect of CSA-based scenarios on the soil salinity and pH was minimal, in which no significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in soil salinity and pH were observed owing to CSAbased management practices (Table 3). Irrespective of CSA-based scenarios, soil salinity Values with a similar lowercase letter (s) with in each soil depth are not significantly different at 0.05 level of probability using Tukey's HSD test. (for a detailed description of scenarios refer to Table 1).The effect of CSA-based scenarios on the soil salinity and pH was minimal, in which no significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in soil salinity and pH were observed owing to CSA-based management practices (Table 3). Irrespective of CSA-based scenarios, soil salinity ranged from 0.22 to 0.28 dS m −1 , while the soil was almost neutral, and the pH varied from 7.1 to 7.8. However, both EC and pH in EWC were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher in rice CSA-based scenarios over maize CSA-based and farmers' practices (Sc1) (Table 3). The rice-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3) showed similar EC in EWC to those observed for maize-based CSA scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5), irrespective of crop management. However, the pH of EWC in rice-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3) was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher than maize-based scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) by 7.4%, irrespective of management systems. All CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5) showed higher TOC in both bulk soil and EWC than farmers' practice (Sc1) but did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ from each other (Table 3). Interestingly, under CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5), the average TOC in EWC was two times higher than the average TOC in bulk soil. In farmers' practices, OC was found only in the bulk soil (0.65%); however, under CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5), OC was found in the bulk soil (0.98%) and in EWC (1.91%). TOC in bulk soil under CSA-based scenarios was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher (50.0%) over Sc1. Maize-based CSA scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased TOC in bulk soil by 4.7% and in EWC by 8.7% over ricebased CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3), irrespective of crop management practices. Similarly, SDI-based CSA scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased TOC in bulk soil by 9.0% over FI-based CAS scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4), irrespective of the cropping system.All CSA-based scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased available N in bulk soil and EWC over Sc1, irrespective of cropping systems, with Sc5 having the maximum effect (Table 3). The exception is FI-based CAS scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4), which were on par with Sc1 for available N in bulk soil. Maize-based CSA scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) and rice-based scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3) significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased available N in bulk soil by 14.8% and 15.8%, respectively, over Sc1, irrespective of crop management practices. The effect of the cropping system on available N in bulk soil was minimal, where both cropping systems had similar values. However, implementing SDI significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased available N in bulk soil by 9.3% compared to FI, irrespective of the cropping system.Available P and K in bulk soil were not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected by CSA scenarios, while in EWC, all CSA scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased available P and K over Sc1 (Table 3). Full CSA scenarios (Sc2-5) did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in P and K in EWC, except for Sc3 that recorded a significantly higher available P relative to Sc4 and Sc5. Rice-based scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3) significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased available P in EWC by 14.0% over maize-based scenarios (Sc4 and S5). However, in bulk soil, maize-based scenarios (Sc4 and Sc5) showed statistically similar available P to those obtained from rice-based scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3).Interestingly, similar to C, in farmers' practices, available N, P, and K were found only in the bulk soil. However, under CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5), available N, P, and K were found in the bulk soil and in EWC. Furthermore, the available N, P, and K in EWC were always higher under all CSA scenarios than in bulk soil. Irrespective of the CSA scenario, available N, P, and K in EWC were higher than in bulk soil by 5.6, 60.0, and 160.0% for N, P, and K, respectively. Moreover, amounts of available N, P, and K were highly affected by CSA practices. On average, CSA scenarios increased available N, P, and K levels (in EWC) from 0.0 kg ha −1 in Sc1 to 167.0, 50.8, and 547.8 kg ha −1 , respectively.In the EWC, DHA, acid phosphates (ACP) and alkaline phosphates (ALP) were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher under all CSA-based scenarios with respect to Sc1 (Figure 3). CSA-based scenarios did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in DHA and ALP activities, only DHA under Sc4 was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower than other CSA-based scenarios. As for ACP, the highest activity was recorded for Sc3 which was on par with Sc4 and Sc5 (Figure 3). In EWC, rice-based CSA scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased DHA, ACP, and ALP activities by 9.4, 5.4, and 14.0%, respectively, over maize-based scenarios. Moreover, SDI-based CSA scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased DHA and ACP activities in EWC over FI-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4) by 46.6 and 11.5%, respectively, while ALP was not affected by the irrigation system. As for the bulk soil, CSA-based practices did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in ALP and ACP activity and were on par with Sc1 (Figure 3). The exception is ACP in Sc5, in which a significantly lower value (relative to the control) was observed. DHA activity was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) decreased in all CSA-based practices, except for Sc5 which was on par with Sc1 (Figure 3).ACP, the highest activity was recorded for Sc3 which was on par with Sc4 and Sc5 (Figure 3). In EWC, rice-based CSA scenarios significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased DHA, ACP, and ALP activities by 9.4, 5.4, and 14.0%, respectively, over maize-based scenarios. Moreover, SDI-based CSA scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased DHA and ACP activities in EWC over FI-based CSA scenarios (Sc2 and Sc4) by 46.6 and 11.5%, respectively, while ALP was not affected by the irrigation system. As for the bulk soil, CSAbased practices did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in ALP and ACP activity and were on par with Sc1 (Figure 3). The exception is ACP in Sc5, in which a significantly lower value (relative to the control) was observed. DHA activity was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) decreased in all CSA-based practices, except for Sc5 which was on par with Sc1 (Figure 3). ), acid and alkaline phosphatase (µg p-NP g −1 soil h −1 ) activity in soil and earthworm cast (EWC) as influenced by different CSA-based crop management scenarios (data transformed through square-root method). Pars with a similar lowercase letter (s) are not significantly different at 0.05 level of probability using Tukey's HSD test. Letters apply only within each parameter. (for a detailed description of scenarios refer to Table 1).In the PCA of 25 variables, three PCs were extracted with eigen values > 0.9 and explained 75.8% of the variance (Figure 4); first and second components explained 59.9% and 13.9%, respectively, of variation. Based on PCA, about 59.9% loadings were provided by the parameters in PC1 that can be used as key indicators for assessing soil quality. The results showed a strong and positive correlation between EW abundance (density and biomass for the 0-15 and 15-30 cm soil depths) and parameters located on the upper righthand side (Figure 4), i.e., IR, MWD, TOC in bulk soil and EWC, available N, P, and K in the bulk soil and EWC, enzymes' activities (DHA, ALP, and ACP) only in EWC. However, EW density and biomass for the 0-15 and 15-30 cm soil depths were negatively correlated with enzyme activity (DHA, ALP, and ACP) in the bulk soil and BD. In the top-soil layer, a significant positive correlation was observed between EWs' density and TOC in bulk soil (r = 0.84), TOC in EWC (r = 0.87), IR (r = 0.68), MWD (r = 0.94), P in bulk soil (r = 0.95), P in EWC (r = 0.74), K in soil (r = 0.96), and K in EWC (r = 0.86) (Table S1). Similarly, EWs' biomass significantly correlated with TOC in bulk soil (r = 0.66), TOC in EWC (r = 0.92), IR (r = 0.44), MWD (r = 0.81), P in bulk soil (r = 0.83), and P in EWC (r = 0.81). Similar trends were observed for the sub-surface soil layer (Table S1).with enzyme activity (DHA, ALP, and ACP) in the bulk soil and BD. In the top-soil layer, a significant positive correlation was observed between EWs' density and TOC in bulk soil (r = 0.84), TOC in EWC (r = 0.87), IR (r = 0.68), MWD (r = 0.94), P in bulk soil (r = 0.95), P in EWC (r = 0.74), K in soil (r = 0.96), and K in EWC (r = 0.86) (Table S1). Similarly, EWs' biomass significantly correlated with TOC in bulk soil (r = 0.66), TOC in EWC (r = 0.92), IR (r = 0.44), MWD (r = 0.81), P in bulk soil (r = 0.83), and P in EWC (r = 0.81). Similar trends were observed for the sub-surface soil layer (Table S1). The effect of different management practices and their linear contrast and interactions on EWs' density, EWs' biomass, physico-chemical, and enzymes' activities under CSA-based management practices are given in Table 4. The effect of scenarios, depth/soilcasts, and their interactions (Scenario x Depth/soil-casts) on EWs' density and biomass, TOC, pH, N, P, and K was significant (Table 4). The effect of scenarios and Scenario × Depth/soil-casts interactions was significant for all measured parameters except EC and The effect of different management practices and their linear contrast and interactions on EWs' density, EWs' biomass, physico-chemical, and enzymes' activities under CSAbased management practices are given in Table 4. The effect of scenarios, depth/soil-casts, and their interactions (Scenario x Depth/soil-casts) on EWs' density and biomass, TOC, pH, N, P, and K was significant (Table 4). The effect of scenarios and Scenario × Depth/soil-casts interactions was significant for all measured parameters except EC and DHA. However, the effect of depth/soil-casts interaction was significant for all parameters except N, P, and enzymes' activities.The effect of tillage (ZT vs CT), irrigation management (SDI vs FI), and cropping system (RW vs MW) was evident on EWs' density and biomass, most soil physical properties, and all biochemical properties of EWs' casts. However, except for (TOC, N, and K), the biochemical properties of bulk soil were not significantly affected by tillage, irrigation system, and cropping system (Table 4). Moreover, all soil physical properties (except SPR) and biochemical properties of EWC were significantly (p ≤ 0.01) affected by tillage (Table 4). However, in the bulk soil, only TOC, N, K, and DHA were significantly affected by tillage. The effect of the cropping system (RW vs. MW) was significant (p ≤ 0.05) on all soil physical properties (except MWD) and biochemical properties of EWC (p ≤ 0.01), while the biochemical properties of soil bulk were not affected by the cropping system (except, TOC, ALP, and DHA) (Table 4). Furthermore, the effect of the irrigation system (SDI vs FI) was significant (p ≤ 0.05) on all soil physical properties (except BD), and all biochemical properties of EWC. As for the soil-bulk biochemical properties, only TOC, pH, N, and K were affected by the irrigation system. CT-conventional tillage, ZT-zero tillage, PB-permanent bed, FI-flood irrigation, SDI-sub-surface drip irrigation, RW-rice-wheat, MW-maize-wheat, EC-electrical conductivity, TOC-total organic carbon, N-nitrogen, P-phosphorus, K-potassium, DHA-dehydrogenase, ACP-acid phosphatase, ALP-alkaline phosphatase, BD-bulk density, IR-infiltration rate, MWD-mean weight diameter, SPR-soil penetration resistance. NS = Not Significant. * Significant at p < 0.05, ** significant at p < 0.05, *** significant at p < 0.01.The absence of EWs in farmers' practice (Sc1) indicates the intensive soil biological degradation in the IGP of India. The limited EWs' abundance in the conventionally managed agroecosystems has been reported previously in India [4,28,29] and worldwide [15,20,47,61]. Intensive tillage lessens the EWs' abundance by killing and injuring them, exposing them to predators by bringing them closer to the soil surface, decreasing their food source through the acceleration of OM decomposition [22,26], and creating unfavorable soil physical conditions, e.g., temperature, moisture, and soil structure [62]. During tillage, about 68-70% of the EWs' biomass can be lost [44,63]. The very low abundance of EWs under farmers' practices in rice fields was confirmed by Singh et al. [29] in which they outlined that EWs were more abundant at the margins of the paddy fields in India, but no EWs were observed inside the fields. Our results were also confirmed by the findings of Giannitsopoulos et al. [64] who found that the highest EWs' density (181-228 m −2 ) was achieved under the least destructive tillage, while the most disruptive tillage yielded the lowest densities (75-98 m −2 ).The burning or removal of crop residue directly influenced EWs by reducing their food source. In contrast, the input of OM by crop residue retention or organic amendments promotes EWs' density and abundance [20,24,30]. In the present study, TOC strongly correlated with EWs' density and EWs' biomass for the two soil depths (Figure 4). Several studies reported a significant correlation between soil OC and EWs' abundance [26,42,61,65]. Giannitsopoulos et al. [64] estimated that for every 10% increase in crop residue retention on the soil surface, EWs' density could increase by 15 indv. m −2 .The effect of the cropping system on EW density and biomass was significant. The higher EWs' density and biomass of CSA maize-based scenarios (Sc4 and 5) over CSA rice-based scenarios (Sc2 and Sc3) could be attributed to the increased crop residues amount in which 14.5 Mg ha −1 of crop residues was retained annually on the soil surface compared to 12.34 Mg ha −1 for rice-based CSA scenarios. The higher input of crop residue in maizebased CSA systems has been translated to a 4.7% higher TOC in bulk soil by over rice-based CSA scenarios that could contribute to better EWs' proliferation under maize-based CSA scenarios. Similar results were reported by other researchers [15,19,20] in which they reported that EWs' abundance is affected by crop residues amount and TOC in the soil. Irrespective of food \"OM\" quantity, the quality of crop residues also plays an important role whereas the C/N ratio of maize residues (43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50) is lower than rice residue (58)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65), implying that maize residue is a favorable food source of EWs relative to rice residues. Abail and Whalen [55] reported that EWs' biomass and density were higher under crop residues with a lower C/N ratio. In the present study, maize was irrigated at SMP of −40 to −50 kPa, while the rice was irrigated at −20 to −30 kPa, indicating better aeration under maize cultivation which could be another compelling reason for the enhanced EWs' density and biomass under maize-based CSA scenarios. Dhar and Chaudhuri [66] attributed the low EWs' density in paddy soils to inadequate drainage and anaerobic conditions. This explanation was validated by the higher EWs' density and biomass for SDI-based scenarios compared to the FI-based scenarios. Interestingly, SDI-based CSA scenarios (Sc3 and Sc5) could promote the EWs' population not only by providing better soil anaerobic conditions but also SDI-based CSA scenarios increased TOC in bulk soil by 9.0% over FI-based CAS scenarios, irrespective of the cropping system.The observed increase in TOC in bulk soil under CSA-based scenarios could be explained by the greater residue input and the less soil disturbance over ten years. Several studies reported higher SOC under conservation agriculture practices than conventional practices [11,[67][68][69]. The low SOC under Sc1 might be due to the combination of crop residue removal and intensive tillage that increases SOC losses by increasing its exposure to environmental fluctuations [35]. Furthermore, tillage (puddling/ploughing) breaks stable aggregates and exposes the protected OM to microbial decay [61,64,68]. Subsequently, lesser soil disturbance provides potential protection of SOC inside the macroaggregates [68,70,71].The amount of TOC in bulk soil is determined by the OM input and soil fauna activities, in particular by activities of EWs. EWs' feeding, burrowing, and casting activities impact OM distribution and dynamics [18,20,21,23,71,72]. Besides the higher TOC in the bulk soil of CAS-based scenarios (0.98%), relative to Sc1 (0.65), the presence of the EWC is another significant source for the TOC (1.98%), which was absent under Sc1. Angest et al. [46] demonstrated that EWs function similar to biochemical reactors that assist in converting plant compounds into microbial necromass in stabilized carbon pools \"in their casts\" without altering the TOC. In the present study, EWs' activity promoted the formation of stable aggregates that protected the SOC against microbial attack [48,49], in which the MWD was positively correlated with EWs' density (r = 0.94) (Figure 4 and Table S1). This suggestion is corroborated by the observed significantly higher MWD under CSA-based scenarios (Figure 1), and TOC in bulk soil, in which MWD was significantly correlated with TOC in bulk soil (r = 0.89) (Figure 4 and Table S1). EWs' activity might have also stabilized SOM through its incorporation and protection in their casts [48]. The higher average TOC in EWC (1.91%) relative to the bulk soil in CSA (0.98%) and the bulk soil of Sc1 (0.65) supports this scenario (Table 3). In short, EWs can promote C sequestration by increasing the decomposition of newly added C into stable C either inside stable aggregates or inside their casts, thus aiding soil C storage in the long term [25,46,48].CSA practices increase the mean weight diameter (MWD) of water-stable aggregates through increasing TOC, decreasing soil disturbance, increasing EWs' population, and reducing SOC loss [64, 68,70,71]. The MWD was positively correlated with TOC (r = 0.89) and EWs' density (r = 0.94) and EWs' biomass (r = 0.81). Under farmers' practices, intensive tillage breaks the stable aggregates and exposes protected OM to microbial decay and kills the EWs [9,24,68]. Similar to our results, the water-stable aggregates under ZT and residue retention were higher in the studies of Li et al. [73] and Song et al. [9] over conventional practices. EWs' activity not only promotes humus formation but also mixes such components to create stable aggregates [74]. Upon cast deposition, microbial products together with EWs' mucilages, bind soil particles and form very stable aggregates [75].The minimum soil disturbance (due to adoption of ZT), increased MWD, and higher SOC content led to a reduction in soil BD of CSA-based scenarios. Our results corroborated the previous findings of [35] under similar ecologies in which they reported that ZT and CRR reduced soil BD. In the present study, a significant negative correlation between soil BD and TOC (r = −0.54) was observed (Figure 4). The higher soil BD under Sc1 could be due to the compaction induced by tillage operations that were followed by puddling [4]. Puddling destructs soil aggregates and fills the macro-pores with finer soil particles [76]. The reduced BD could also be due to the increased large bio-bores due to EWs' browning (vertically and horizontally) and to the enhanced soil structure (increased MWD). Gathala et al. [52] found that the increase in MWD increases soil macro-porosity and reduces soil BD. A significant negative correlation was found between soil BD and EWs' density (r = −72), EWs' biomass (r = −0.66), and MWD (r = −0.65) (Figure 4 and Table S1). Similar to our results, Kumar et al. [77] found a strong negative correlation (r = −0.78) between BD and MWD.The observed increase in infiltration rate (IR) in the present study owing to CSA practices could be attributed to the direct and indirect influences of CRR, ZT, and EWs' activity. Under CSA practices, Ews' activity might enhance the MWD which could lead to an increase in the IR. This is evident from the observed positive correlation between IR and EWs' density (r = 0.68) and MWD (r = 0.88) (Figure 4 and Table S1). Under CSA-based scenarios, the highly stable aggregates and EWs' activities not only reduce the chances for the formation of surface crust but also increase the portion of macro-and bio-porosity [78], and pores connectivity [68,78]. Under ZT, the burrowing activity of the undisturbed EWs leads to an increase in the number of bio-pores, thus IR [23]. EWs vertically dig and create large bio-pores (higher than one mm in diameter) that could extend deeper than one meter in the soil profile [23].The peak SPR (3.03 MPa) observed for Sc1 was at 20 cm which could be due to the creation of a hardpan by tillage operations [79]. As for the CSA scenarios, despite the significantly higher SPR in the 5-15 cm soil depth, (Figure 2) the maximum SPR (1.83 MPa) was below the critical value of 2-3 MPa that could affect the growth of wheat roots [80]. However, the observed increased SPR in the CSA-based scenarios in the 5-10 and 10-15 cm depths differs from the results of Jat et al. [3] in which they found lower SPR in ZT than in CT. Our results corroborate the findings of Dekemati et al. [61] in which they reported higher SPR under ZT for the top 20 cm. Interestingly, despite high SPR (which might affect EWs' abundance), in the present study, the maximum EWs' density and biomass were observed under CSA-based scenarios where significantly higher SPR values were observed, implying that EWs' abundance is a function of various interacting factors (tillage, amount and type of crop residue, irrigation management, cropping system, and soil type) and not only one factor [42,61].Crop residue decay leads to nutrient release that could be available to plants [81]. Soil biological properties, OM amount, and nutrient availability are strongly correlated [10]. In the present study, under CSA-based scenarios (Sc2-5), available N, P, and K were higher in both the bulk soil and in EWC, compared to farmers' practices in which due to the absence of the EWs (thus, EWC), available N, P, and K were found only in the bulk soil. This increase might be due to the integration between CRR, EWs \"feeding and casting\", and microbial activity. This is evident from the strong and positive correlation between available N, P, and K in the bulk soil and EWs' density on one side and TOC in the soil on the other side (Figure 4 and Table S1). The adoption of ZT and continuous CRR for 10 years coupled with precision water management promoted EWs' proliferation, which enhanced and transformed soil microbial structure in a way that boosts SOM mineralization [4,18,20,48], thus releasing available N, P, and K in the soil while maintaining a higher amount inside the EWC. As for available N, P, and K in EWC, the EWs ingest litter on the soil surface [15,19]. This digested litter is converted to a nutrient-rich product by establishing a mutualistic relationship with soil microflora [32]. Once ingested, the unassimilated and undigested litter portions are returned to the soil as EWC. The fresh EWC depositions lead to a release of large quantities of nutrients (N, P, and K) that are easily assimilable by plants [82]. In this way, changes in EWs' density and activity could be manifested by increased nutrient levels (both in bulk soil and EWC) [14]. Bertrand et al. [23] reported that high EWs' abundance in the 0-15 cm could have more available N than low EWs' abundance. Our results were supported by a recent metanalysis that concluded that EWC is highly fertile and contains 40-48% more total P, N, and OC than bulk soil [83]. In the current study, significant amounts of available N, P, and K were accumulated in the EWC. On average, CSA scenarios (Sc2-5) increased available N, P, and K from 0.0 kg ha −1 in Sc1 to 167.0, 50.8, and 547.8 kg ha −1 , respectively.Soil enzymes are responsive to soil management practices, e.g., tillage, cropping diversity, crop residue, and nutrient management [4,34,35]. However, lower enzymes' activities in bulk soil were found under CSA-based scenarios than the EWC. In contrast, CSA-based management scenarios influenced EWs, thus microbial activities, as evidenced from extracellular enzymes' activities, i.e., ALP, ACP, and DHA in EWC [10]. EWs establish a mutualistic relationship with soil microflora [32], converting crop residues to EWC containing enzymes and microorganisms [4,48]. Earthworms affect enzyme activities by stimulating microbial communities [46,47] and enhancing enzyme activities [84]. For example, Hoang et al. [33] found higher enzymes' activities in the topsoil in bio-pores compared to rhizosphere and bulk soil. The higher ALP and ACP in EWC might explain the higher levels for P in bulk soil and EWC [39]. In the present study, we investigated the impact of different CSA practices that promote EWs' activity, and how EWs influence the soil physico-biochemical properties of the soil, irrespective of EWs' species (ecological groups). Future studies must include the classification of EWs to their ecological groups as affected by various CSA practices.Earthworms (EWs) were absent under farmers' practices, reflecting the high pressure on EWs' communities due to intensive tillage and crop residue burning/removal in the rice-wheat system. Long-term adoption of CSA-based practices markedly boosted EWs' abundance, positively affected soil structure, increased TOC, nutrient availability, and soil biological activity, in particular, the CSA maize-based cropping system. The high TOC in EWC suggests the potential transformation of the retained crop residue to stable SOC inside the EWC, thus increasing SOC sequestration. Similarly, EWC contained a significant amount of available N, P, and K under CSA practices. Maize-based CSA scenarios recorded higher EWs' density, EWs' biomass, TOC, and MWD over rice-based CSA scenarios. Interestingly, SDI-based CSA scenarios yielded higher EWs' density and biomass, TOC, and available NPK, relative to FI-based CSA scenarios. Therefore, long-term adoption of CSAbased maize-based scenarios using SDI improved EWs' proliferation, TOC, and nutrient storage (in the soil and EWC) and showed a better choice for the IGP farmers' w.r.t. soil physical and biological properties. Future studies must include the classification of EWs to their ecological groups as affected by various CSA practices."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1364194861.json b/main/part_2/1364194861.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4612a5f285564bc149d157fe501b7ae28fc4157 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1364194861.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"91921a14aabe7a6fe10b17d0ff997d6d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9408104e-48a6-4228-8622-b8cb5184d2b5/retrieve","id":"421468497"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"32f604c7-bf28-459b-a545-27c07c70813c","content":"The diets of pastoralists are changing as they cope with the impacts of drought and other climate shocks.• Tracking commodities that pastoralists consume helps in understanding how the supply of these commodities influences the diets of pastoralists, and consequently their nutrition status. • Near real-time assessment of pastoralists households' coping mechanisms to climate shocks and scarcity provides an opportunity for prompt data-driven solutions to constraints faced by pastoral households. • Digital innovations offer an opportunity to collect data that could otherwise be very difficult to collect in such settings. These tools are suitable for tracking fast moving indicators, provide early warning information, and are crucial to inform anticipatory action. • There is need for investments in cost-effective information gathering mechanisms in pastoral areas to understand the mechanisms through which shocks impact livelihoods.| Digital innovations for high-frequency ground truthing and monitoring of household welfare in pastoral communitiesPastoralists occupy approximately 40% of Africa's landmass (Union 2013). A large proportion of this landmass is arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) characterized by low and erratic rainfall. Pastoral systems and livelihoods are vulnerable to climatic shocks. Climatic shocks cause spatial and temporal uncertainty of pasture and water resources (Aberra and Abdulahi 2015). The adverse impacts of climatic shocks manifest in several forms including livestock mortality, increased food insecurity, malnutrition and conflict (Walker et al. 2022). It is estimated that the ongoing drought in the Horn of Africa has claimed over 7 million livestock which in turn has led to almost 7 million children suffering from acute malnutrition (ReliefWeb 2022).Despite their harsh environment and climate challenges, pastoral livestock production systems contribute significantly to national and regional economies (Walker et al. 2022). For example, livestock contributes an estimated 57% of the regional agricultural gross domestic product (AGDP) in the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) countries. Therefore, efforts to enhance and sustain the contribution of pastoral livestock systems to economic development must address the adverse impacts of climatic shocks. A critical step towards tackling climatic shocks is understanding the mechanisms through which such shocks impact pastoral systems and livelihoods. However, the pathway of impact from climatic shocks to household welfare is not well understood in pastoral settings. One reason for this gap is the complexity of collecting data in the fragile and remote pastoral environments. Yet there is an urgent need to understand the relationship between climate shocks and the coping strategies available, and the intra-seasonal variability in household welfare (Bell et al. 2016). This information would be helpful to inform anticipatory action and the designing of interventions for building resilience of pastoralist systems and livelihoods in the long-term.Past efforts to gather information in pastoral settings largely relied on traditional surveys. While useful, this approach is expensive to deploy in remote resource-constrained regions, which limits sampling representativeness (Wilde et al. 2019). Consequently, there is underrepresentation of remote areas in national-level surveys and reduced frequency of data collection. This makes tracking of dynamic indicators of household well-being extremely challenging (Giroux et al. 2019). Meanwhile, the telecommunication landscape is rapidly changing in pastoral areas. Ownership of mobile phones has increased tremendously and is revolutionizing communication and data gathering in the pastoral settings (Jenet et al. 2016).In efforts to close these gaps, the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and partners have been working on innovative prototypes of data collection platforms. Among the specific approaches implemented by ILRI and partners include the use of digital innovations for a near real-time collection of data at high frequency in remote locations. The approach uses crowdsourcing techniques, where data are collected and submitted by pastoralists themselves, and provides a variety of expanded capabilities which in addition to supporting data collection, facilitate feedback provision (Chelanga et al. 2022;Lepariyo et al. 2020;Naibei et al. 2017). Building on successful pilots of the data collection platforms, sentinel zones have been set up in the drylands of Kenya and Ethiopia, for collection and dissemination of highfrequency and multi-dimensional data through the digital platform. 1 Data on key environmental and socio-economic indicators are being collected to inform technical design and quality assessment of initiatives in the region. This brief describes the approach, presents preliminary results from the data, and summarizes the lessons learned so far.1. https://www.drylandinnovations.com/dirisha provides detailed information on setting up sentinel clusters.The sentinel zones have been set up in Marsabit County (Merille, Korr, Kargi and Olturot) in northern Kenya and in Borena region (Saba-Elwaye, Harweyu-Yabello, Higo-Dubluk and Magole-Dillo) in southern Ethiopia. This brief focuses on the sentinel zone in Marsabit County in Kenya (Figure 1). The digital micro-tasking platform is designed to allow for flexibility in dynamically responding to data needs in space and time and collects higher resolution data than is currently available for any type of data from these regions. Tasks are geofenced so that they can be matched to local environmental conditions and to ensure that they are performed within specified locations, such as livestock markets. Indicators are monitored at two levels: (1) community level and (2) household level.i. Community-level data Data is collected by contributors using a flexible microtasking platform developed and tested by ILRI and partners in pastoral areas since 2016 (Figure 2). Market information includes volumes of livestock sold, livestock prices, and body condition of different types of livestock. Images of the livestock are also submitted as verification mechanisms for the collected data (Chelanga et al. 2022;Alulu et al. 2020). In addition, the platform collects information on temporal forage condition (Chelanga et al. 2022).ii. Household-level data Data is collected by households using a picture-based mobile app, that does not require numeracy or literacy, this is a key feature when working with households from pastoral areas. The survey questions are presented in form of audio and icons, allowing for collection of more granular data, and addressing the issues of recall bias (Figure 3). Since these data are collected by the households, the frequency with which they are collected allows for near real-time information on fast moving indicators. In addition, the platform supports real time provision of customized feedback on selected indicators to households based on their input (Lepariyo et al. 2020). Though the brief describes the two levels of data collection, the focus of the remaining sections is on the household-level data collection and key results from analyzing those data.iii Data collection The research team intentionally selected eight households from each of the four sentinel clusters that constitute the Marsabit sentinel. The caregivers where trained on using the data collection tool. Data collection started in July 2021. The households' tasks were grouped into four categories according to the topic of the survey task: household, caregiver, child mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and child update. During the setup of the sentinel zone, Marsabit County had had two failed rains (long rains and short rains of 2021). Figure 4 shows vegetation condition and rainfall performance for 2021 and 2022 compared to seasonal averages. The following section illustrates trends observed from the data collected. As mentioned previously, the region had drought conditions during the entire data collection period. Specifically, the collected data reflect households' coping with long-term drought and are probably quite different than one would expect during normal conditions.The selected households submitted data on four surveys: caregiver, child, household, and child MUAC. As show in Figure 5, there was a great increase in submission on week 17 of data collection, this was attributed to a field visit by the research team to monitor progress and retrain the households.The result section explores dietary data obtained from the approach, even though the approach collected data on multiple indicators. i Dietary data Dietary data was collected using a dietary diversity approach was based on 16 food groups as shown in Table 1 (FAO 2016) 2 . Caregivers who are primarily (Figure 6). The proportion of households consuming milk is highest in Kargi (98.3%) and lowest in Korr (0.02%). A sizable proportion of households in Merille (65%) and Olturot (55%) also consume milk. Milk consumed by households in the sentinel clusters is mostly from own production indicating that variability in consumption could be due to coping strategies employed in the different sentinel clusters. Particularly in Kargi where we observe high proportion of households consuming milk, this could be attributed to migratory patterns of livestock, a strategy that allows households to have access to milk. Conversely, in Korr where milk consumption is low, this could be attributed to worse forage conditions forcing livestock to migrate further, thus decreasing household milk access. Interestingly, we observe that households in Korr reported to have consumed legumes (77%) of the time, compared to (25%) of the time in Kargi. Therefore, suggesting that when households don't have access to milk, they consume more legumes as shown by the interchanging observations in Korr and Kargi. To observe trends and tease out dynamics, we looked at reporting of food consumption by day of the week. This is particularly important to assess the supply of commodities that are not directly produced by pastoral households, which is mostly through weekly livestock markets and small urban centres, and influences the kind of food consumed on a particular day. We observed a similar trend of food groups consumed in all days of the week in Kargi, Korr and Olturot, with little to no variation in each of the mentioned sentinel cluster (Figure 7). However, in Kargi dark green leafy vegetables were not consumed in most days of the week. In Merille, households reported consuming a greater variety of food groups compared with the other three sentinel clusters. Households in Merille are located closer to the main highway than the others and potentially benefit from responsible for meals preparation in the household, responded to a set of questions on a 24-hour recall basis.The daily collection was intended to capture day-to-day variability in food consumption that could be introduced by temporal pasture conditions, migration, periodic access to markets, or cultural cycles in consumption.Caregivers answered these questions about themselves, an index child 3 and the household.a) Household consumption Table 1 presents the proportion of households that consumed the different food groups. The most consumed food groups are oil and fats (92%), cereals (91%), sweets (82%); and spices, condiments and beverages (77%). The least consumed food group was fish and sea foods (0.04%). These results are consistent with findings from the report of the Marsabit County Smart Survey (2019) which showed that the five most consumed food groups are cereals (98%), oils and fats (94.7%), sweets (93.7%) and condiments (85.9%) while the least consumed food group is fish and sea foods (3.2%). The proportion of households consuming milk over the survey period was 49%, which is slightly lower compared with the proportion (67.3%) reported in the Marsabit County Smart Survey of 2019. This decline could be attributed to the pasture conditions, since milk availability is largely determined by forage conditions. access to more variety of food as a result. Furthermore, there is a well-established livestock market in Merille that is held every Thursday, which could also be a source of various commodities. The preliminary results from the data provide insights and trends on how pastoral diets could be changing as they cope with the impacts of drought. These findings can help in understanding climate shocks faced by households and how they cope with these shocks. Intrahousehold allocation of resources changes especially in times of scarcity due to climate shocks and variability which affects livelihoods (Harris-Fry et al. 2017). Being able to observe these changes in near real-time resolution provides an opportunity for prompt data-driven solutions to constraints faced by pastoral households.Households in all the Marsabit sentinel clusters are mostly dependent on livestock for their livelihoods.Tracking the commodities that they consume but do not produce is important in understanding how the supply of these commodities influences the diets of pastoralists, and consequently their nutrition status. As demonstrated, digital innovations can provide data that could otherwise be very difficult to collect in such settings. In addition, the agility of the approach as discussed by Chelanga et al. (2022), makes this approach suitable for tracking acute malnutrition indicators. There is therefore an urgent need for investments in cost-effective information gathering mechanisms in pastoral areas to increase market players, thereby sustaining local livelihoods, easing stress, avoiding conflict, and helping governments to empower pastoralist to build their resilience."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1365499668.json b/main/part_2/1365499668.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e5a1c3469ec816fcc4af71bd5a234b43f0a2ebc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1365499668.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"05e918364918e82a322a2cb9697f957b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ea158bb7-a79e-454f-ac30-a49873c99d3d/retrieve","id":"-1916095954"},"keywords":["Sustainable intensification","Food loss mitigation","Post-harvest technologies","Impacts","Farm households"],"sieverID":"79a30f34-8154-4118-9e8c-dd976195d1a0","content":"During the last decade, post-harvest losses (PHL) reduction has been topping the agenda of governments as a pathway for addressing food security, poverty, and nutrition challenges in Africa. Using survey data from 579 households, we investigated the factors that affect farmers' decisions to adopt post-harvest technologies: mechanized shelling, drying tarpaulins, and airtight storage validated for reducing PHL in Tanzania's maize-based systems, and the impacts on households' food security and welfare. Mechanized shelling addressed a labor issue, while tarpaulins and airtight storage addressed product quality and quantity concerns. The results revealed large farm sizes and location in higher production potential zones (proxies for higher production scale) and neighbors' use of the technologies as universal drivers for adoption. Access to credit and off-farm income were unique determinants for airtight storage, while group membership increased the probability of adopting drying tarpaulin and airtight storage. The technologies have positive impacts on food security and welfare: drying tarpaulins and airtight storage significantly increased food availability (18-27%), food access (24-26%), and household incomes (112-155%), whereas mechanized shelling improved food and total expenditures by 49% and 68%, respectively. The share of total household expenditure on food decreased by 42%, 11%, and 51% among tarpaulin, mechanized shelling, and airtight storage adopter households, signaling significant improvements in food security and reductions in vulnerability. The results point to the need for policy support to enhance the adoption of these technologies, knowledge sharing among farmers, and financial resources access to support investments in the technologies.Smallholder farms in East and Southern Africa provide food, income, and employment to millions of rural families. For this reason, the deployment of affordable best practices and innovative arrangements to enhance income and food security through reduced wastage and prevention of food quality loss among this group of farmers is crucial. Following the renewed interest in agriculture during the last decade, governments and development agencies focused on scaling-up of investments in post-harvest food loss (PHL) reduction as a critical action point for improving food security and welfare objectives while reducing pressure on natural resources as envisioned in the sustainable development goals (UN, 2015). PHLs are exceptionally high in developing countries due to inadequate harvesting, handling, processing, and storage techniques and practices (Ali et al., 2021). Therefore, the deployment of affordable best practices and innovative arrangements to reduce PHLs is crucial. In particular, the critical points where the most significant losses occur must be addressed with proven technologies, taking into account the objectives of the various food system actors (Cattaneo et al., 2021).PHLs deny farmers opportunities to increase returns on investment, weakening the capacity to secure improved livelihoods. They involve opportunity cost, resource misallocation, and wastage (Tesfaye & Tirivayi, 2018). The losses decrease food supplies and diminish the market value, nutritional content, and safety (Affognon et al., 2015). The causes of food losses at various stages of the post-production chain are varied but generally involve a complex interaction of biological, physical, and socio-economic factors. Post-harvest operations exacerbate these interactions by their tedious, labor-intensive, and time-consuming nature. In Tanzania, drying, threshing, and storage are critical points where economically significant grain PHLs occur (Abass et al., 2014).Proper drying ensures that the grain will endure threshing and storage without spoilage. Drying is also part of the grain trading system (De Groote et al., 2021). The shelled grain should be dried to ≤ 13.5% moisture under safe conditions to avoid contaminations with fungi. Many smallholder farmers dry grain directly on the ground, which also contaminates it with soil-borne residues. The process is slow and encourages spillage and pest attacks. Grain losses equivalent to 2-9.5% occur in various African countries during drying (Hodges et al., 2014). The Africa RISING (Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation) 1 program validated and promoted the GrainPro Collapsible Dryer Case™ (CDC), a plastic sheet envelope designed for quicker and protected sun-drying. In use, the reinforced polyvinyl chloride sheet (optimized for solar energy absorption) is spread out, and the produce (cobs, pods, or the threshed grains) is placed on top. In bad weather (rains), the tarpaulin is folded to enclose the produce in a zipped envelope. This action saves labor and time needed to gather and move the produce away; the drying is continued after the rain by simply opening the envelope again. Farmers adapt the technology in several ways; some use damp-proof coating sheets available from local hardware shops, while others use canvas or stitched woven polypropylene sheets that ably protect the produce from direct contact with soil. The use of the CDC® decreased maize grain drying time by 28%, avoided loss of 32 kg/ton of grain, and reduced impurities (30%) and moldy grain (42%) (IITA, 2019). In Kenya, simple plastic sheets for grain drying lowered aflatoxin contamination by about 50% compared to direct drying on bare ground (Pretari et al., 2019).Threshing operations facilitate grain handling, storage, and marketing. As commonly practiced in Tanzania, manual grain threshing is labor-intensive, tiresome, time-consuming, and delays processing for storage (Abass et al., 2014). Significant post-harvest losses also occur through mechanical damage and spillage. In Zimbabwe, up to 3.5% losses occurred during maize shelling, while rice threshing and winnowing operations in Madagascar and Ethiopia were associated with 8.5% and 11% losses, respectively (Hodges et al., 2014). To overcome threshing inefficiencies among smallholder maize producers, Africa RISING validated and promoted a low-cost motorized sheller (4 horsepower, capital cost $630) that completes shelling and grain winnowing work all at once. Using the sheller reduced shelling losses from 6.8% to 2.0%. Farmers who switched to this technology reduced drudgery by 58 -74% (Mutungi et al., 2022) and improved labor efficiency by 77 -90%, saving costs and freeing time to undertake other farm and household activities.Adequate storage enables households to have a consistent supply of food and increases farmer incomes by enabling them to engage in temporal arbitrage, taking advantage of seasonal price fluctuations (Kotu et al., 2019). Many rural farmers still use traditional storage techniques (Edoh Ognakossan et al., 2016). While easily accessible and cheap, the traditional techniques can fail to protect the stored produce affecting safe food provisioning in the lean season. Africa RISING validated and promoted chemical-free grain storage in hermetic containers (metal silo/plastic silo/hermetic bags). The technologies decreased storage losses by more than 85% (Abass et al., 2018;Mutungi et al., 2020), hence proved to be a valuable tool for addressing food security and income objectives among rural households (Kotu et al., 2019). Furthermore, the technology reduced the likelihood of aflatoxin accumulation 5-eightfold in Kenya (Ng'ang'a et al., 2016).Farmers adopt new technologies when they are convinced beyond doubt that using them would better address household objectives such as food security and decent livelihoods (Kotu et al., 2019). To date, evidence on the impacts of post-harvest technologies on various sustainable intensification domains is still needed in sub-Saharan Africa (Affognon et al., 2015;Sheahan & Barrett, 2017). Thus far, the few studies available limit the scope to storage (Brander et al., 2021;Gitonga et al., 2013;Omotilewa et al., 2018;Tesfaye & Tirivayi, 2018). To the extent that economically significant PHLs occur at multiple farm-level stages, extending the grasp of farmers' decision-making processes to other post-harvest technologies is important. Broadly, mechanized shelling (MS) addresses a labor issue, while drying tarpaulins (DT) and airtight storage (AS) address product quality and quantity issues that characterize PHLs. Overlaps, however, do exist.This study aimed to investigate the differences in farmers' adoption decision behavior for MS, DT, and AS, and assess the potential contribution of the three technologies to rural households' food security and welfare in Tanzania. The study contributes to the literature in the following ways: First, we generate knowledge of farmers' decisions to adopt a suite of postharvest technologies for losses mitigation at the most critical farm-level steps. To our knowledge, not many studies have compared the adoption of multiple post-harvest technologies. Second, we estimate the technologies' food security and welfare benefits and elucidate the factors influencing the outcomes among households. Unlike previous studies, e.g., Gitonga et al. (2013) that established causality between the adoption of post-harvest technologies and welfare outcomes at the household level using methods that only correct for observed characteristics, we employ the endogenous switching regression model (ESRM) to control for both observed and unobserved characteristics. By estimating separate outcome regressions for adopters and non-adopters of each of the three post-harvest technologies using the ESRM, we explore the structural differences between the two groups. We organize the rest of the article as follows: Section 2 describes the data, sampling strategy, and outcome indicators, Section 3 the conceptual and empirical frameworks, Section 4 presents the results and discussion, whereas the last section draws conclusions and policy recommendations.2 Data, sampling strategy and specification of variablesThis study uses household survey data collected from 579 households across Tanzania's four regions of Manyara, Dodoma, Iringa, and Songwe, where Africa RISING program validated and promoted the three improved postharvest technologies (IPHTs) namely: drying tarpaulins (DT), motorized maize shellers (MS), and air-tight storage containers (AS) in 2013-2020. The survey covered 10 out of 64 intervention wards in four purposively selected districts: Babati (Manyara), Kilolo (Iringa), Kongwa (Dodoma), and Mbozi (Songwe). The wards were selected using probability proportional to size sampling (PPS) and 14 villages were selected randomly. Survey households were selected randomly from village household lists, and one adult member was interviewed using a structured questionnaire prepared for this purpose. In half of the cases, we interviewed male household members (mostly the head), and in the remaining cases, female household members (mostly the spouse or a female head) based on a prior random assignment. Enumerators received training on the theoretical and practical aspects of the IPHTs, and the use of the computer-assisted personal interviewing software (Surveybe ® , EDI Global, United Kingdom) deployed for the survey. All participants received a clear explanation of the survey objectives and were requested to give verbal consent; we interviewed only those who consented.Apart from post-harvest related data (e.g., awareness, adoption, and cost of IPHTs) the survey collected rich household data such as age, education, and marital status of the household head, size of the household, and assets owned. The survey also collected comprehensive data on crop production, yields and marketing, and household expenditures.Food security is a state in which \"all people at all times have the physical, social, and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to meet dietary needs and food preferences for productive and healthy life (CFS, 2012). This definition reflects different dimensions, including food availability, access, utilization, and stability. Availability connotes the physical existence of food from own production, held stocks, or market. Food access requires that households have enough economic or physical resources to obtain or produce food in sufficient quantity, quality, and diversity, and concerns household resources, incomes, expenditure, markets, and food prices. Utilization in the socio-economic sense concerns aspects determined by knowledge and habits that shape decisions on what food to produce or purchase and how to prepare, allocate and consume it within the household. Stability concerns the temporal dimension of food security and visualizes a relative constancy in food availability, access, and utilization. Welfare relates to living standards or the economic and social conditions of households and is proxied by measures of consumption or income (Moratti & Natali, 2012). In measuring welfare, consumption is favored over income as individuals derive material well-being from the actual consumption of goods and services rather than receiving income per se (Citro & Michael, 1995).For the present study, we considered four indicatorsmonths of food insecurity (MFI), household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS), and per capita monthly food consumption expenditure (FCE) as measures of food security. As indicator of household welfare, per capita monthly total consumption expenditure (TCE) was used. We constructed these indicators as follows:• MFI gave the frequency of household food insecurity in the past year reflecting the availability and stability components. We computed MFI as the average number of months households spent an entire day without three meals due to inadequate food supplies the year preceding the survey. • HFIAS measured the degree of food insecurity by evaluating responses to a set of standard questions representative of three universal domains of food access in terms of a household's anxiety and uncertainty about (i) inadequate food supply; (ii) insufficient quality; and (iii)insufficient food intake within a 30-day recall period during the lean period (Coates et al., 2007). HFIAS captures the behavior of being worried about access to quality, quantity, and acceptability of food (Carletto et al., 2013). We calculated the HFIAS (which takes the value of a whole number between 0 and 27) by summing up the codes for each frequency-of-occurrence of nine key food security questions in the three domains as detailed elsewhere (Coates et al., 2007). The higher the score, the more food insecurity (access) the household experienced. • FCE measured the monthly value of the food consumed by household members at home or away from home and captured improvements in household food access.The FCE was the average value of food consumed per household member from own production, purchase from the market, gifts, in-kind payments, and other sources, including restaurants, canteens, food courts, and street food. All food acquired that was not purchased was valued using the corresponding market prices. • TCE proxied income improvements and reflected households' living standards by capturing asset ownership and other non-consumption expenditures such as contributions to health, education, taxes, social security transfers, or gifts and donations. We estimated the TCE by summing up the food and non-food consumption expenditures divided by household size.The factors that are likely to affect the adoption of IPHTs include age, education, household size, landholding, and asset ownership representing the capital strength of households. The effect of age could go either way; older farmers may adopt IPHTs more readily because they have more dependents, capital, and preferential access to financial resources (Sall et al., 2000), while younger households might have longer planning horizons and therefore more willing to take risks (Adegbola & Gardebroek, 2007). Good education increases adoption through a better ability to interpret technical knowledge and allocate resources. Household size is a proxy for labor availability -studies show larger households are more likely to adopt improved agricultural technologies (Abdulai & Huffman, 2014). Gender influences adoption decisions through differential access to resources and information (Fischer et al., 2021). Other farm and system-level factors, including experience of production shocks, contact with extension, membership to a group, nearness to market, access credit, and agroclimatic conditions, also contribute to farmers decisions to adopt new technologies (Abdulai & Huffman, 2014;Alene & Manyong, 2007;Tesfaye & Tirivayi, 2018). We hypothesized that households confronted more with production shocks, e.g., crop failure will look for information on IPHTs. We considered contact with extension and social networks (i.e., group membership, and neighborhood effects) as indicators of exposure to information. At the same time, nearness to market, access to credit, and bank and mobile money ownership would encourage IPHTs adoption by providing an incentive to produce for the market and easing liquidity barriers. More wealth and off-farm income facilitate IPHTs adoption (Sall et al., 2000).3 Conceptual and empirical frameworksPost-harvest losses shrink harvest volumes and degrade the quality of harvested products. As a result, households experience a direct reduction of the safe and nutritious food available to them. In the market space, the losses connote higher food prices or lost market opportunity for households who produce and sell to earn income. Improved post-harvest technologies can yield food security and welfare gains through several pathways. Direct benefits result from reduced losses in quantity and quality that can contribute to more food availability. Thus, technologies such as improved storage increase the available food stocks, stabilize the supply, and raise the marketable surpluses, contributing directly to food access and ability of households to settle financial obligations. The storage technologies allow farmers to choose the best time to sell their product and tap into higher prices during the lean season as grain prices are always lower at harvest than later. Technologies that reduce time and labor requirements in tedious and labor-intensive operations, e.g., mechanized shelling, potentially impact food security through positive time and labor adjustments enabling households to generate more food and income from additional on-farm or off-farm activities. Such adjustments can raise household welfare through increased and diversified expenditures while enhancing ability to cope with food supply and income disruptions.Given that we use cross-sectional data, estimating the impact of IPHTs on food security and welfare is not trivial. Some previous studies e.g., Becerril and Abdulai, (2010) and Gitonga et al. (2013) used propensity score-based methods such as propensity score matching (PSM) to estimate impacts of improved agricultural technologies on smallholder farmers' welfare. However, PSM only controls for observed characteristics and therefore may result in biased estimates if unobserved characteristics such as motivation, managerial capacity, and technical abilities of the farmers in understanding and using new technologies are not controlled for (Abdulai & Huffman, 2014). To account for observed and unobserved characteristics, we use the ESRM (Lee, 1978). By modeling both selection and outcome equations, ESRM controls for factors that affect the treatment (adoption/non-adoption) while disentangling the factors influencing the outcomes between the adopters and non-adopters (Besley & Case, 2000). Previous empirical studies have employed this framework to study the impacts of agricultural technologies' adoption (Abdulai & Huffman, 2014;Asfaw et al., 2012;Khonje et al., 2018;Manda et al., 2019;Shiferaw et al., 2014;Tesfaye & Tirivayi, 2018;Tufa et al., 2019;Wossen et al., 2017).A household's decision to adopt an IPHT is a case of constrained optimization. The household decides to adopt the IPHT when there is a positive difference between the marginal net benefits of adopting and not adopting the technology. Let P * denote this difference so that P * > 0 corresponds to the net benefit of adopting the technology exceeding that of not adopting, and it is under this condition, the farmer decides to adopt the technology. However, P * is not observable; what is observed is P, which represents the observed behavior of the farmer regarding the adoption of the technology. Let P i be a binary variable representing a farm household's adoption status for IPHT (MS or DT or AS), which take the value of 1 for households who decide to adopt and 0 otherwise. A household's decision to adopt the stated IPHT is represented by the latent variable framework below: with where Eq. 1 represents a probit model of adoption of IPHT, α is a vector of parameters to be estimated, Z is a vector that represents characteristics (household, farm-level, systemlevel, and agroclimatic) that comprise decision determinants to adopt or not adopt the IPHT, and ε is the random error term with mean zero and variance 2 . The error term includes measurement error and factors not observed by the researcher but known to the farmer (Alene & Manyong, 2007).Conditional on the IPHT adoption decision, we can observe the actual outcomes, which are a function of improved technology use alongside observed variables such as household characteristics, farm-level factors, (1)system-level factors, agroclimatic conditions, and unobserved variables such as innate abilities and managerial capacity. The outcomes are represented by a switching regime as:where y 1i and y 2i are the outcome variables for adopters and non-adopters of IPHT, respectively; x 1i and x 2i are vectors of explanatory variables assumed to be weakly exogenous;1 and 2 are parameters to be estimated and w 1i and w 2i are error terms. The error terms in the selection Eq. ( 1) and outcome Eqs. (3a, 3b) are assumed to have a trivariate normal distribution with zero mean and covariance matrix such that:where 2 = variance (ε), 2 w1 = variance (w 1 ), 2 w2 = variance (w 2 ), 1 = covariance (ε, w 1 ), and 2 = covariance (ε, w 2 ). Since y 1 and y 2 are not observable simultaneously, the covariance between w 1 and w 2 is not defined (Maddala, 1983). Also, since the error term of the selection function (Eq. 1) is correlated with the error terms of the outcome functions (Eqs. 3a and 3b), the expected values of w 1 and w 2 conditional on the sample selection are non-zero and can be defined as:where θ is the standard normal probability density function, ϕ is the standard normal cumulative density function. Equations ( 5) and ( 6) simplify to: 1i = (Zi ) (Zi ), respectively, where 1 and 2 are the inverse mills ratio (selectivity terms) calculated from the selection equation and are included in the outcome equations to correct for selection bias in the endogenous (regime) switching regression model by substituting Eq. ( 5) and ( 6) in (3a) and (3b) as follows:For the ERSM to be identified, there is a need to include at least one instrumental variable (IV) in the selection model). An IV should significantly affect the adoption of IPHT conditional on other covariates (relevance condition) and affect the outcome variables (MFI, HFIAS, FCE, TCE) only through adoption, but not directly (exclusion restriction). We used farmer's neighbor adoption decision (1 if neighbor adopted a particular IPHT and 0 otherwise) as an IV. While the selection of instrumental variables is empirically challenging, others, e.g., Adegbola and Gardebroek (2007), have stated that source of information is a vital element influencing the adoption of agricultural technologies. Such information may be transmitted through spatial relationships, especially when farmers closely rely on their friends and neighbors for improved farm practices (Tessema et al., 2016). A neighbor's adoption of IPHT is likely to be correlated with a household's adoption decision but not with food security and welfare outcomes. We checked whether our instrument correlated with the adoption status (relevance condition), and the reported results in Table 2 show that the instrument is relevant. Several previous studies used similar instruments, e.g., Abdulai and Huffman (2014) and Wossen et al. (2019). 2 The outcome equations for adopters and non-adopters of the IPHTs were estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression with selectivity correction. To estimate the impacts, we compared the observed and counterfactual scenarios of expected values of the outcomes for adopters. For an adopter of a named IPHT, the expected value of the outcome variable is expressed as:The expected values for the same farmer had he/she decided not to adopt the IPHT (counterfactual) is given as: Therefore, the impact of adoption on the outcome variables for those who adopted IPHT, i.e., the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT ), is calculated as the difference between Eqs. (8a) and (8b):Table 1 presents the means of the primary treatment variable, i.e., IPHTs (DT, MS and AS) adoption disaggregated by districts. The variable took a value of 1 if the household reported having used the IPHTs in the season preceding the survey, otherwise, 0. On average, about 60% and 57% of the survey respondents adopted DT and MS, respectively. The adoption of DT and MS superseded AS, possibly because the former have been promoted longer than the latter in Tanzania. Mbozi district had the highest DT adoption rate (80%) while Babati district recorded the highest MS adoption (82%). Overall, Kongwa district had the lowest adoption rates across the three IPHTs.Descriptive statistics of the outcome and explanatory variables are presented in Appendix Table 4 (see Appendix). Adopters of the IPHTs had significantly fewer days of food insecurity and lower food insecurity (access) scores. They also had significantly higher food and total consumption expenditures. The adopters and non-adopters of the three technologies were distinguishable by household heads' education, ownership of bank/mobile money account, group membership, and neighbors' technology use status. Additionally, a higher proportion of the male-headed households used DT and MS than the female-headed ones. MS adopter households were also likely to be larger than the non-adopter households, possibly due to higher production linked to the availability of farm labor. Adopters of AS were more likely to have access to credit than non-adopters. In contrast, MS and DT adopters and non-adopters did not differ on credit access. DT and AS adopters were more likely to have contacted government extension than non-adopters. Contrastingly, the likelihood for such contact among MS adopters and non-adopters did not differ, suggesting a weaker public extension engagement on mechanization. Adopters of DT were likely to be located further away from the market than the non-adopters; a need for improved storability to ensure sufficient stocks and less reliance on market purchases could motivate distantly located households to use the technology. Finally, non-adopters of MS were more likely to receive private transfers than the adopters, a distinction not seen with DT and AS-this could be linked to lower agricultural production of these households as they also were distinguishable as having less farmland.First stage ESRM results (Table 2) show that households with larger farms were more likely to adopt all three technologies. Farm size is related to production scale. High production is more profitable due to economies of scale and is likely to incentivize demand for IPHTs. The results are consistent with other studies (Abdulai & Huffman, 2014;Gitonga et al., 2013;Manda et al., 2016).Off-farm income and access to credit increased the probability of AS adoption but not MS and DT. This observation might suggest that households accessed DT and MS more affordably; the two technologies were accessed mainly through local service providers. With this option, households could negotiate payment terms (e.g., payment-in-kind) and access the technology more easily than AS (hermetic bags and silos) that required prior settlement before acquisition. In addition, having a bank account or mobile money facility increased the likelihood of adopting the three technologies. These facilities bridged farmers with credit sources hence relaxing liquidity constraints. Mobile banking is particularly attractive for its convenience as a source of soft credit and reduces transaction costs (Nan et al., 2021). In recent years, mobile telephone messaging has also become a mode of extension, enabling farmers to receive technical information and basic financial services, which might have encouraged IPHT adoption.Membership to a group increased the probability of adopting DT and AS. Group membership increases social networking and information flow regarding the benefits of new technologies (Abdulai & Huffman, 2014;Kassie et al., 2011). In Tanzania, farmer groups are important sources of credit and technology access. Some groups organize around the village-based community banking model. Others operate informal rotating savings and credit accounts and are platforms for farmer learning and consolidated inputs acquisition, which might encourage the adoption of technologies on a case-to-case basis (Sseguya et al., 2021).Households that received private transfers were less likely to adopt the technologies, particularly MS. Private transfers are a component of the total household income. Households with elderly members or meagre farm resources (e.g., land) are more likely to receive such support from their nextof-kin working away from home. The elderly and poorly endowed households are less likely to engage in productive farming; hence, the transfers could only increase the budget allocation for necessities such as food (Maitra & Ray, 2003). Receiving transfers could also discourage technologies' adoption because of assured alternative food sources. Neighbors' decision to adopt IPHTs correlated positively with households' use of the three IPHTs, suggesting vital signals regarding the technologies emanated from acquaintances. Abdulai and Huffman (2014) have termed neighbors as social network nodes that help clarify aspects of modern technologies; hence doubts diminish as farmers get to know more farmers in their vicinity who have adopted. Furthermore, farmers living near each other may emulate one another due to shared experiences and space-specific characteristics, including bio-physical and socio-economic conditions (Muthoni et al., 2017).District dummies show that households in Kilolo and Kongwa were less likely to adopt the IPHTs than those in Babati. Production potentials of the different agricultural environments may explain this observation. Babati is a relatively higher crop production zone where humid/sub-humid conditions support maize production and various crops ranging from rice and cotton in the lower-lying plains to wheat and potatoes in the higher elevations. Farmers also keep livestock on a semi-intensive scale. Fairly similar (humid) agroclimatic conditions characterize Mbozi district. In contrast, Kongwa and parts of Kilolo are semi-arid zones with lower production potential -the maize-based systems in these districts integrate with lower-value crops, including drought-tolerant sorghum, millet, pigeon peas, groundnuts, and livestock on a pastoral scale. Our data also revealed wealth, dependency, and information access differences across the districts. The households in Babati were wealthier and less likely to receive transfers than those in Kilolo and Kongwa. Household members in Babati were also more likely to belong to farmer groups and receive extension services from development agencies.Second stage ESRM results (Eqs. 7a and 7b) are presented in Table 3 (as well as Appendix Tables 5 and 6). Due to space limitations, only the ESRM estimates for DT (Table 3) are discussed. The significant positive coefficients on the sex of household head and value of assets among DT non-adopters show that female-headed and poorer households were likely to have lower consumption expenditures (TCE and FCE) than male-headed and wealthier households. Likewise, among the non-adopters, being older and more educated contributed positively to food access (proxied by HFIAS). Households whose heads were more educated also had higher food consumption expenditures. Conversely, household wealth, age, sex, and education of household heads were not key factors in explaining food security and welfare impacts among the adopters. This observation might suggest that using the technology produced social balancing effects. In the same vein, among the adopters and non-adopters alike, larger households were likelier to experience more days of food insecurity (proxied by MFI). However, the non-adopters were further likely to experience diminished food access and lower food consumption expenditures, thus severer food insecurity.Having a large farm contributed positively to food availability and total consumption expenditure among DT adopters. The marginal impact of DT use on food security and welfare was thus greater among the larger producers, potentially due to economies of scale. Kotu et al. (2019) reported similar scale-dependency of farm-level technology benefits, specifically the profitability of AS bags and metal silos. On the contrary, having off-farm income decreased food access and total consumption expenditure among the non-adopters. According to Wozniak (1984), involvement in off-farm activities may restrict decision-making in farm activities leading to low farm productivity. Moreover, farmers engaging in off-farm income-generating activities may simply be doing so to shield against the effects of low farm production (Abdulai & Huffman, 2014). This explanation is sound considering that the non-adopters owned averagely smaller farms and were more likely to have liquidity constraints (see Fig. 1). The bank account and mobile money coefficients indicate that the two variables enhanced food availability, food access, and consumption expenditures among DT adopters and nonadopters. Among the non-adopters, these facilities might have encouraged remittances that smoothen income flows hence food availability and access through purchases in times of shortage (Nan et al., 2021). Bank/mobile money facilities potentially relaxed liquidity constraints and reduced transaction costs among the adopters, enhancing the technology's contribution to food availability and access.Belonging to a group contributed positively to food security and welfare among DT adopters. The negative coefficients on MFI and HFIAS suggest that this factor improved food availability and access. These impacts are attributable to network effects that simplify technology access and use. The positive coefficient of group membership on the adopters' TCE further implies that social networks expanded incomes. Other authors averred that social networks reduced costs associated with adopting new technologies and enabled farmers to market their products (Abdulai & Huffman, 2014). Longer distances to the market generally diminished food access among households. Furthermore, DT adopters located further away had lower food consumption expenditures signaling reduced purchases potentially due to better storability of their food stocks.Private transfers correlated negatively with food access among DT adopters and non-adopters. This observation is intriguing, although others (Lentz et al., 2005) have argued that receiving aid can adversely affect the recipient's behavior and discourage self-assurance investments as alternative food/ income sources exist. Contact with public extension services appeared to dampen the food access impact among DT adopters, which might mirror the scope of the extension services provided. Location fixed effects were significant determinants of food security and incomes among DT non-adopters; those in Kongwa, Kilolo, and Mbozi were more food insecure than the non-adopters in Babati. Additionally, DT non-adopters in Kilolo had significantly lower TCE. These differences across locations with different farming potentials did not occur among the adopter households. Results in Appendix Tables 5 and 6 (ESRM estimates for MS and AS) can be interpreted similarly.An interesting finding in Table 3, Appendix Tables 5, and 6 is the significance level of the coefficient estimates on the variables Mills1 and Mills2. These are the inverse mills ratios used to correct for selection bias as indicated in Eq. 5 and Eq. 6. We reject the null hypothesis of no sample selection as some of the coefficient estimates for the inverse Mills are significant, implying that there is a selectivity problem, and one should not rely on OLS which ignores this problem.Figure 1 shows the average effects of IPHT adoption on the various outcome variables. Unlike the mean outcome differences presented in Appendix Table 4, which may confound the impact of adoption with the influence of other characteristics, the ESR estimates reveal causal effects. The results show that DT use had significant causal effects on all outcome indicators. The technology decreased MFI by 0.31 months, representing an 18% increase in the duration of food availability. On average, adopters of DT would have spent about ten full days per year without three meals had they not used such technologies. The technology also decreased HFIAS by 0.7 units, representing a 26% gain on the food access scale. DT also significantly increased consumption: adopter households would have forfeited US$ 7.82 and US$35.96 on food and total consumption expenditures, respectively, had they chosen not to use the technology. 3 These consumption expenditure gains (food: 26%, total: 112%) could be attributable to improved grain storability and better marketable quality. More food expenditure might mean that households can access diverse foods, including commodities they did not produce. The adoption of MS had causal effects on consumption expenditures. The monthly food consumption expenditure per capita among adopters of MS increased by TZS 30,297 (US$ 13.17), and the total consumption expenditure increased by TZS 71,367 (US$ 30.03), representing 49% and 68% gains compared to the counterfactual situation. The increase in consumption expenditures is potentially the result of savings on labor costs and income generation from productive utilization of freed time. Contrary to expectation, MS had statistically insignificant impacts on MFI and HFIAS. It is important to note that the main impact pathway through which MS is expected to affect the food security and welfare outcomes is freeing up labor and labor cost savings. This collaborates the positive and significant MS impacts on food consumption and total consumption expenditure. Our results agree with Daum et al. (2020), who reported a perceived increase in financial security and income as farm mechanization's main positive socio-economic effect. With MS, households would have had more time for off-farm activities to generate extra income to buy more food and pay for various non-food expenditures.AS use had significant causal effects on all four indicators. Food insecurity (MFI) decreased by at least 11 days representing a 27% gain in the duration of food availability, while food access (HFIAS) improved by 24%. The results agree closely with others. Using propensity score matching, Gitonga et al. (2013) reported that metal silo adopters in Kenya reduced the duration of food insecurity by at least one month, Chegere et al. (2020) observed a 31% reduction in HFIAS among hermetic bag adopters in Tanzania. Our results further show significant increases in food (24%) and total (115%) consumption expenditures; the AS adopters would have lost US$ 8.26, and US$ 49.40 in food and total consumption expenditures per capita had they decided not to use the technology. Thus, AS enabled households to have a stable supply of own-produced food and higher incomes from temporal arbitrage, avoided losses, and possibly lower storage costs. Earlier investigations in the study area found the mean per capita economic impact of using AS bags to be US$ 5-14 from both arbitrage (82%) and loss abatement effects (18%) (Kotu et al., 2019).Other authors (e.g. Omotilewa et al., 2018;Ricker-Gilbert & Jones, 2015) reported that effective reduction of storage losses improved productivity by incentivizing farmers to invest in yield-increasing technologies that could contribute to the increased incomes and welfare of households.Increasing incomes can change consumption patterns. Our results suggest that with the adoption of the technologies, the incomes of households increased, which likewise increased the expenditure on food while expenditure on other items increased even more. The share of household expenditure on food (FCE: TCE ratio) declined by 40%, 11%, and 51% (from 0.92 to 0.55; 0.59 to 0.52; 1.07 to 0.52) among DT, MS, and AS adopters, respectively compared to the counterfactual situation. These declines signaled reduction in households' vulnerability. Smith and Subandoro (2007) categorized households spending > 75% of their total incomes on food as being highly vulnerable and food insecure, and those spending < 50% as having low food insecurity.Tanzania's Agricultural Sector Development Program II: 2017/18-2027/28 (GoT, 2017) prioritizes post-harvest management through promotion and dissemination technologies that encourage better handling and storage of food to achieve food security and improved livelihoods in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN, 2015). This study examined the factors that influence the adoption of farm-level post-harvest technologies and their impacts on households' food security and welfare in Tanzania. The findings revealed marked differences in the adoption determinants of IPHTs. Generally, large farms, locations in higher potential zones, and neighbor's use are universal adoption drivers. These observations have implications for policy guidelines leaning towards increased productivity in farms and learning among farmers to increase adoption of the technologies for the targeted benefits. Farm size and potential are related to production scale. Since expanding farmland for food production is unsustainable, options that involve the use of more efficient technologies and management practices should be encouraged. The fact that neighbor's use encouraged the adoption of the three technologies underscores the importance of neighborhood effects. To this end, stronger integration of progressive farmers to lead promotional programs can speed up the adoption of the IPHTs. The positive influence of group membership on the adoption of DT and AS further points to the importance of strengthening farmer associations as avenues for enhancing adoption.Limited access to capital and financing options remain significant challenges to agricultural technologies' adoption among rural farmers (Balana et al., 2020). Access to credit and off-farm income were especially unique determinants for AS adoption because, unlike MS and DT, the acquisition was not open to negotiated arrangements. Engaging in off-farm employment is a strategy for stabilizing household income and supporting agricultural investments (Anang et al., 2020). Other studies have observed that policies to promote the adoption of rural technologies should include mechanisms for breaking barriers to financial services' access. Concerning formal credit, the traditional focus has been addressing supply-side factors, e.g., improving proximity to credit sources and reducing the cost of borrowing. Balana et al. (2020) have found that demand-side factors such as financial illiteracy and fear of risk (e.g., due to market failure -economic benefits are particularly key as borrowers need enhanced returns to repay) are equally responsible for low agricultural credit use in Tanzania hence polices should focus addressing demand-side constraints as well. Opportunities to increase off-farm income in the rural areas include service provision, value addition, and trade. The decision to engage in off-farm labor market is subject to individual and household characteristics such as the ability to supply off-farm labor. Given the low education levels of farmers in the present study areas, relevant policies would include human capacity development (education) for off-farm labor market participation. However, as already discussed, off-farm engagements can adversely affect decision-making in farm activities, and hence the appropriate models should be found.The three technologies positively impacted households' food security and welfare. A synthesis of the associations between the impacts and various household-and farm-level variables shows distinctive trends across adopter and non-adopter households, pointing to potential system-level impacts. With MS, impacts among adopters are driven more by productive factors: production scale (farm size) and investment support factors (access to credit and off-farm incomes). However, among the non-adopters, impacts appear to be driven by factors that simplify social support, including bank account/mobile money ownership and group membership that also expedite social transfers. The impacts of DT and AS among the adopters, unlike the non-adopters, were not driven by socio-demographic (sex, age, education, household size) and locational factors. Therefore, adopting the technologies could enhance social equity and reduce spatial disparities brought about by agroclimatic factors. Further studies should investigate system-level impacts in detail. These include the general equilibrium impacts such as how the interventions affect non-adopting farm households or the welfare of value chain actors downstream, including consumers who are not producers. Moreover, there is a need to unravel the intrahousehold distribution of the benefits, which we did not achieve in this study due to data constraints. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1372658928.json b/main/part_2/1372658928.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f91e03de36699279d2e7d6abb0c889c6a303da7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1372658928.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"de47b147e0723a99d71c6292623102c1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e24d019d-1c50-46a8-ac04-6efa2dee75ec/retrieve","id":"-1907596584"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2deff93b-940c-4e57-8377-8f04f6bbc541","content":"Malian farmers have been growing millet and sorghum for millennia. These crops are still the main staples of subsistence farmers in an agri cultural sector that is almost entirely rainfed (i.e. farmers do not have access to irrigation).National average yields for both crops are low at less than 1 tonne per hectare. These low yields are often attributed in part to low adop tion rates for improved seed; no more than 10% of the country's cereals area is planted with im proved seed. Low adoption rates have in turn been blamed on the poor performance of the formal seed system. The formal seed sectors for sorghum and millet continue to be largely staterun, with some participation by regis tered farmer cooperatives in multiplying seed. So far, commercialization of farmerproduced seed has failed.Farmers need to have access to a wide range of welladapted varieties to cope with the varying rainfall and soil conditions in theThe impact of diversity field forums: improving farmer management of millet and sorghum in Mali Bioversity International's series of Impact Assessment Briefs aims to inform readers about the major results of evaluations carried out by the centre. The Briefs summarize conclusions and methods of more formal papers published in peerreviewed journals.region. Growing a diversity of varieties also helps farmers reduce the risk of crop losses from biotic stresses (pests and diseases) and abiotic stresses (such as drought, salinity or flooding).Early attempts to breed improved sorghum and millet generally had disappointing results, largely because they were based on materials imported from elsewhere, particularly India, that were not well adapted to local conditions.Recent breeding efforts have focused on participatory plant breeding-involving farm ers in defining the objectives of the breeding programme through to testing and selecting improved materials. This helps ensure that the varieties developed meet local conditions and demands and raises the likelihood that they will be adopted. This, coupled with decentral ized seed production, may help reduce the time lag between development and adoption of im proved varieties and encourage their spread to more remote areas.This brief summarizes an evaluation of the impact of one such participatory research effort known as diversity field forums (DFFs). DFFs bear some similarities to farmer field schoolsan approach to improving crop management practices that involves teaching groups of farm ers how to solve problems, set priorities and conduct research through facilitated, hands on sessions in fields allocated by the farming community. The Forums aim to strengthen the capacity of farmers to understand, analyse and manage their own plant genetic resources by creating a physical space that facilitates the exchange of ideas among farmers, extension agents and researchers and encourages farm ers to experiment with different varieties and production approaches.The project, Empowering Sahelian Farmers to Leverage their Crop Diversity Assets for Enhanced Livelihood Strategies, was funded by the Inter national Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) from 2005, coordinated by Bioversity International and implemented by a combina tion of local, national and international organizations. Vil lagers designed and conducted the field trials, with techni cal support from project staff, on land that they had set aside for the purpose. Farmers studied both modern varieties and landraces.The DFFs were conducted at two villages to the northeast of the capital, Bamako. Boumboro is in the SaheloSudanian zone (annual rainfall of 450-600 mm); Bambara and Bobo are the major ethnic groups in this site. The landscape is a mosaic of cultivated woodland savannah. Petaka is in the Sahelian agroclimatic zone (annual rainfall of 200-400 mm). The major ethnic groups in this region are Dogon, Peulh and Sonrhaï. The area is characterized by a series of rocky pla teaus and outcroppings interspersed with sandy plains, for est cover, cultivated areas and pasture.These villages were selected because they were both within dry savannah areas in an area served by an IFAD investment programme and differed in their access to mar kets and services. Boumboro has a higher density of large, weekly markets and other types of physical infrastructure than does Petaka.These factors generate an obvious, but unavoidable, placement bias that limits the extent to which findings from this study can be generalized. The findings therefore shed light on the potential of the DFF approach, but should not be seen as a comprehensive evaluation.The impact analysis employed interviews with all partici pating farmers as well as statistical sampling of 150 farm ers per village, representing both 'treatment' and 'control' groups. Farmers who participated in DFFs constituted the treatment group and a roughly equal number of nonpartici pating farmers constituted the control group.The analysis aimed to account for selection bias-that is, to avoid mistaking preexisting differences between treat ment and control groups for differences caused by participa tion in the project. Selection bias is an issue because, when participation is voluntary, factors that influence the likeli hood of participation might also affect the outcome of par ticipation. For example, farmers with more income, assets and access to information may be more likely to decide to participate in a project but would also likely attain higher yields whether or not they participated.Of the two test villages, Boumboro has the longest and most extensive history of project activities. Surrounding villages have thus been influenced by the project through farmer visits to diversity fields cultivated by participants and farmertofarmer exchanges of information and seed. Therefore, some farmers from nearby villages who had been invited to observe DFFs conducted by farmers in Boumboro were included in the treatment group (but were not con sidered to be participants). In the Petaka site, all farmers in the treatment group are from Petaka itself because DFF ac tivities were much more recent and had not involved other villages .Data on households, farms, seed management, yields, market participation and social capital-the extent to which farm households engage in local associations-were col lected in 2006. Additional yield data and data on variety attributes-unique production and consumption attributes supplied by crop varieties-were collected in 2007, when household demographic information was also reconfirmed.Sample attrition and missing responses on some vari ables led to an operational sample size for the analysis of 131 farmers (62 treatment; 69 control) at Boumboro and 149 (56 treatment; 93 control) at Petaka site.Since the goal of the project is to strengthen the man agement of crop genetic resources, impact indicators were defined relative to such resources. Better management of sorghum and millet varieties is expected to enhance yields and contribute to more diverse crop genetic stocks held in farming communities. Therefore, indicators used were:• expected yields of millet and sorghum in the presence and absence of drought;• twoyear average yields based on farmer recall; and • the total count of the unique production and consump tion attributes of the millet and sorghum varieties held in stock at the time of the survey. Relative deprivation-an indicator of the standing of participants relative to others-was also determined using these variables.Several factors made it more likely that a farm household would include a DFF participant. These included:• Being located at the Boumboro site. This was expected given the higher rates of participation and longer project involvement at this site.• Greater relative wealth in terms of farm physical capi tal, defined as the total value of livestock and material assets .• Greater specialization in millet than in sorghum. This may reflect the fact that millet was grown more widely than sorghum at both sites, or that fewer improved mil let varieties have been released at either site relative to sorghum, so farmers may be more active in searching for new materials and means of improving their existing materials.• Greater social capital, i.e. farm households that engage more actively in local associations. DFF participants sold or purchased sorghum or millet in a larger number of markets than did nonparticipants, andIMPACT ASSESSMENT BRIEF NUMBER 5were more likely to possess more social and farm physical capital than nonparticipants. Participation had a positive impact on expected sorghum and millet yields, recalled millet yields and the stock of variety attributes. Farmers in treatment villages were better off in terms of expected yields and attribute stocks than those in control villages, clearly demonstrating the benefits arising from the DFFs. The impacts of the DFFs were greatest in Boumboro, where local field staff have been continuously engaged with farmers for a much longer period of time than in Peta ka. However, inequality in holdings of millet and sorghum genetic resources appears to be greater in Boumboro than in Petaka. The pervasive harshness of the environment around Petaka and the greater degree of selfreliance of farmers there result in them stocking a wider range of vari eties to meet their wideranging consumption and produc tion needs.Two key policy points emerge from the assessment of the im pact of the DFFs. First, longterm commitment to fostering local leadership and capacity is likely to be a key factor in re alizing bene fits from this type of extension approach. The lo cal leader in the Boumboro site was trained both on site and abroad and has since established his own nongovernmental organization working in surrounding communities. Second, for precisely this reason, it will be difficult to scale up this ap proach from one village to many without coordinated sup port from national public institutions and donors.Although farmer selection bias associated with partici pation was taken into account in the analysis of the results, the findings of this study cannot be generalized to other com munities unless these conform to the same criteria used to select sites. A more comprehensive evaluation, which would require the application of additional analytical approaches over a longer time period and in multiple locations, is not yet justified by the amount of funds invested in DFFs nation wide. As more participatory research efforts are undertaken in Mali, however, these evaluations will be crucial.National and international partners in the project were sur veyed using semistructured questionnaires to determine Bioversity's role in the coordination and implementation of the project's activities. Perspectives emerging from each informant were com pared to each other and also contextualized in relation to the position held by each informant in order to weight the a reliability of the answer.There was a generally positive perception both of Bioversi ty's role and its capacity to coordinate the project.The key informants saw Bioversity as having played a central role in coordinating the implementation of several activities throughout the project's life. The informants em phasized the important role of Bioversity in coordinating and facilitating discussions among partners. Bioversity was seen as being able to develop consensus among a multitude of actors at different levels and to coordinate their work in order to implement the project activities and achieve the project's goals within the short time framework and budget constraints faced by the project.Partners emphasized the value of technical and scien tific support given by Bioversity, especially in some key areas relating to genetic conservation. Partners recognized Bioversity's efficiency in circulating research outcomes and considered the organization a driving force and source of scientific knowledge. Many informants highlighted Biover sity's ability to keep track of all the project activities and changes in them and to address problems and difficulties partners encountered. Local partners in particular appreci ated the presence of Bioversity in the field. This had two key results. On the one hand, farmers gained trust and con fidence in the project, having the possibility to pose ques tions and concerns directly to officers of the implementing agency. On the other hand, Bioversity's presence in the field gave partners the opportunity to regularly brainstorm and solve bottle necks during the evolution of the project, adjust ing strategies and indicators as necessary.Overall, all the partners were well satisfied with the role played by Bioversity and the quality of its work, often stress ing that the organization demonstrated how to put scien tific theory into practice, that it demonstrated commitment to the objectives of the project, and that its accurate, careful and flexible management helped bring together the many different partners and enable them to cooperate effectively. Never theless, some concerns emerged regarding delays in \" It will be difficult to scale up this approach ... without coordinated support from national public institutions and donors \"receipt of project funds. Some partners noted that these had a negative impact on project implementation.Communication was also an area of concern. One part ner stressed the need of more communication among part ners of all project components, highlighting the need for meetings to ensure knowledge sharing.Assessing what might have happened without the partici pation of Bioversity in the project was a complex task. The large number of partners involved in the project and the di versity of their roles made it difficult to isolate individual contributions.Respondents indicated that the project may have been implemented in some form without the participation of Bioversity. Some respondents suggested that the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or other organization might have played a similar role. How ever, most recognised that, although other actors could have played the same role in the project (administrative manage ment, funds management, research and project followup), Bioversity was probably the preferred partner because of its experience, competences and focus on genetic resources. Four partners were convinced that no other actor could have played the same role of Bioversity because of the organiza tion's international credibility and the quality of its research, results and work. They suggested that none of the national research organizations could have played the same role and that without Bioversity's coordination it would have been impossible for so many local and national partners to work together.In a more general view the project made both farmers and local authorities more aware of the need to manage ge netic resources. In particular, diversity seed fairs, by creating a physical space to meet other farmers, promoted exchange of experience and information among farmers and stimu lated them to look for new varieties. Diversity field forums offered opportunities for cooperation between researchers and farmers, and allowed farmers to get to know the techni cal characteristics of crops and new varieties, helping them to adapt them to their environment.An informant affirmed that the main difficulty farmers faced in managing their genetic resources was lack of funds, and not lack of knowledge, whereas the project aimed at enhancing their knowledge. Nevertheless, most informants seemed to agree that the project succeeded in enhancing the capacity of farmers to manage their diversity assets.The project also strengthened social cohesion in targeted villages, particularly by improving the status of women and their agricultural production.In conclusion, the project was based on the cooperation of various actors, from the very local level to the international level, each one with their own competencies and specific role in the project. Bioversity successfully coordinated the project, making possible this multilevel and sometimes dif ficult cooperation between partners in order to achieve proj ect's objectives. The scientific knowledge and technical sup port provided by Bioversity to its partners and to Sahelian farmers seems to have had a very positive effect, improving farmers' traditional crop management by providing them knowledge and a better understanding of their crop diver sity assets. Furthermore, some practices and experiences such as diversity field forums and diversity seed fairs have shown their utility and their potential in outscaling project impacts to other villages and farmers.The project thus seems to have succeeded in increasing farmers' productivity, introducing new varieties and in creasing exchange of information and experience between farmers.This brief is based on Smale M., Diakité L., Grum M., Jones H., Traoré I.S. and Guindo H. 2010. The impact of participation in diversity field fora on farmer management of millet and sorghum varieties in Mali. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 4(1): 23-47.Citation: Gotor E., Cherfas J. 2011. The impact of diversity field forums: improving farmer management of millet and sorghum in Mali. Bioversity International Series of Impact Assessment Briefs, no. 5. Bioversity International, 4 p.For further information please contact Bioversity Impact Assessment Specialist Dr Elisabetta Gotor (e.gotor@cgiar.org)"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1374457364.json b/main/part_2/1374457364.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9a958588f840022dd964270c7a4d14fe313273e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1374457364.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"785cdc08-1720-46ab-a705-d9c166461914","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1378427508.json b/main/part_2/1378427508.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b9d74f38a7d6cdfb85b2fcb2c63c563391d6b38 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1378427508.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3598e748b3bda26af22df1c203051575","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/850e64c9-ccb6-4f5f-b3f7-d16bba8df638/retrieve","id":"-316240909"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"af828030-4cd1-4efc-8701-dfb3af66702e","content":"The geographical designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IPGRI or the CGIAR concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Similarly, the views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these organizations.Mention of a proprietary name does not constitute endorsement of the product and is given only for information.IPGRI Technical Bulletins are published by the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute with the intention of putting forward definitive recommendations for techniques in genetic resources. They are specifically aimed at National Programme and genebank personnel.The Technical Bulletin series is targeted at scientists and technicians managing genetic resources collections. Each title will aim to provide guidance on choices while implementing conservation techniques and procedures and in the experimentation required to adapt these to local operating conditions and target species. Techniques are discussed and, where relevant, options presented and suggestions made for experiments. The Technical Bulletins are authored by scientists working in the genetic resources area. IPGRI welcomes suggestions of topics for future volumes. In addition, IPGRI would encourage, and is prepared to support, the exchange of research findings obtained at the various genebanks and laboratories. The conservation and use of forest genetic resources worldwide poses several challenges to scientists, policy-makers and, in particular, to local stakeholders interested in long-term strategies to manage these biological resources in a sustainable manner. The vast diversity of tree species, many of which are still unknown, the high level of threats and the increased demand for forest products require prioritization of actions, clear indications for research and development, and strategies to mitigate the current trends in the depletion of forest resources.The strategy of conservation 'through-use' of forest genetic resources is a very important alternative to an in situ approach and, as such, is to be promoted and developed. However, basic knowledge and understanding of species' reproductive biology, seed production, seed quality and health aspects, limit the use of a larger number of species in important activities such as restoration, rehabilitation, agroforestry and on-farm conservation practices. Increasingly, the use of forest genetic diversity in research and breeding requires a greater movement of germplasm.This Technical Bulletin, prepared by Drs J. R. Sutherland, M. Diekmann and P. Berjak, all well-known scientists in their respective areas of specialization, aims to breach some of the knowledge gaps in forest seed biology and technology and, more importantly, to contribute to future research on priority forest seed health aspects. This is an area of extreme importance for an effective and safe use of existing diversity of tree species in either agroforestry projects or in conservation of genetic resources in managed landscapes programmes, and also to widen the scope of this diversity in the activities listed above. Protocols for fungi and virus detection using different techniques are also presented and discussed extensively.In addition, this Technical Bulletin aims to increase awareness amongst technical staff involved in conservation and use activities. To this end it presents state-of-the-art tools for the identification of the most important tree seed pathogens and provides clear and ready-touse molecular-based tools for the screening of fungi and virus in seeds.We hope that with this publication some of the existing gaps in the knowledge of forest seed health management are addressed in such a way that seed scientists, pathologists and foresters may fully benefit from existing forest biodiversity, and contribute to their effective conservation and efficient and safe use.Everyone who works with orthodox and/or recalcitrant tree seeds should be concerned with seed health issues. Seed health analysts would like to know if germination failure is the result of seed-borne pathogens, whereas foresters and seed dealers often discuss the importance of moulds on the quality of the tree seeds they collect or sell. Reduced germination is of particular importance for genebanks storing forest seeds. Forest nursery managers are interested in seed-borne pathogens affecting seed germination or causing disease in their crop. In tree improvement programmes, pathogens may be transported long distances along with the plant germplasm used. Plant quarantine officials should know if seeds being moved domestically or internationally harbour pathogens of importance to local forests.A number of publications list micro-organisms of tree seeds (e.g. Ivory and Tompsett 1994;Mittal et al. 1990; Mohanan and Sharma 1991;Prochazkova and Jancarek 1991;Sutherland et al. 1987), but there is not a publication dealing solely with forest tree seed health testing. Thus, the purpose of this publication is to assemble several protocols for detecting pathogens of conifer and hardwood seeds.Most of the reports on seed-borne pathogens of forest trees, deal with fungi. However, data on seed-borne viruses of trees are accumulating and, consequently, we have included a section on viruses of hardwood seeds. Although numerous species of bacteria may be detected on tree seeds (Mittal et al. 1990), fruits and cones, little is known about their role in seed health. Some, like the bacterial wilt pathogen, Ralstonia (Burkholderia/ Pseudomonas) solanacearum, of Eucalyptus spp. (Ciesla et al. 1996), may eventually prove to be seed-transmitted, whereas other seed-borne bacteria might be beneficial, i.e. in stimulating seedling growth, as occurs with many soil-borne bacteria (Chanway 1997).Considering the limited knowledge of the role of bacteria on tree seeds, the general protocols described here, complement those procedures recommended for individual pathogens on specific seed species, published by the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). Also included in this technical bulletin, are assays for several pathogens and species of tree seeds, which have not been previously covered. We have also included a section on non-orthodox or recalcitrant tree seeds, contributed by an expert in the field, Dr Patricia Berjak, University of Natal, South Africa, to cover this important group of forest tree species. She discusses different disease detection methods and other procedures for pathogen detection and control.We expect that this information will be useful to seed analysts and general diagnosticians working in genebanks, plant quarantine, and other research facilities, especially in countries where pertinent references may not be available. No attempt has been made to list all of the pathogens found on tree seeds. Refer to Mittal et al. (1990) and Richardson (1990) for such information.Whenever possible, taxonomic references are given for identifying fungi. We also recommend consulting 'A Literature Guide for the Identification of Plant Pathogenic Fungi' (Rossman et al. 1987) which gives taxonomic references for identifying plant pathogenic fungi. Many seed-borne fungi produce only an anamorph (asexual) stage. Barnett and Hunter (1998) give an excellent taxonomic key to the genera of these fungi. General laboratory procedures or recipes for commonly used culture media such as PDA are not covered in this publication. Details can be found for example in Johnston and Booth (1983) or Hawksworth et al. (1995). Although we describe several techniques for isolating specific fungi or groups of fungi, particularly the use of selective media, many seed-borne fungi are easily isolated from surface-sterilized seeds plated onto water agar, potato-dextrose agar (PDA), malt agar (Uniyal and Uniyal 1996), or other standard culture media (Diekmann and Sutherland 1998). Try these less-complicated procedures before moving on to more specific protocols.2 Fungi and seed storageMost temperate tree species produce seeds with an orthodox seed storage behaviour. Orthodox seed storage behaviour is defined by Hong et al. (1996) as \"mature whole seeds (which) not only survive considerable desiccation (to at least 5% moisture content) but their longevity in air-dry storage increases in a predictable way by reduction in seed storage moisture content and temperature\". Recalcitrant seeds in contrast, are \"unable to tolerate more than a limited amount of desiccation, for example to moisture contents in equilibrium at 20°C, with about 96-98% relative humidity\". In between these two categories, are some species with an intermediate storage behaviour, which \"are able to tolerate desiccation to seed moisture contents in equilibrium at 20°C with about 40-50% relative humidity but where further desiccation often reduces viability and always results in more rapid deterioration in subsequent hermetic storage the more the seeds are dried below this value\". Examples for trees with orthodox storage behaviour are Fagus, Fraxinus, Pinus and Prunus. Recalcitrant species are cacao (Theobroma cacao), rubber (Hevea brasiliensis), durian (Durio zibethinus) and jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus); temperate recalcitrant species are oak (Quercus robur), maple (Acer saccharinum) and horsechestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum). Coffee (Coffea spp.), African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis), papaya (Carica papaya) and several Citrus species belong to the intermediate group.Seeds that may be collectively categorized as non-orthodox, especially those commonly described as being recalcitrant, differ from orthodox types in terms of the final stages of preshedding maturation and, notably, in their post-harvest responses. Most orthodox seeds undergo maturation drying as the final phase of their pre-shedding development and will come to water content equilibrium with the relative humidity (RH) of the atmosphere. Even where this is not the case, after harvest orthodox seeds will tolerate a substantial degree of further dehydration (to ca. 5% moisture content [dry mass basis]), and are storable for predictable periods under defined conditions of RH and temperature (Ellis and Roberts 1980). Seeds of any species that do not behave in this way are considered to be non-orthodox (Berjak et al. 1989). While most of the species considered elsewhere in this publication are strictly orthodox, this section deals with those that are not.The original, formal definition of seeds as being orthodox or recalcitrant and, indeed, the introduction of these terms was based on their storage behaviour (Roberts 1973), which is a manifestation of post-harvest seed physiology. When they are shed, not only are recalcitrant seeds characterized by relatively to very high water contents, but they are also actively metabolic (Berjak et al. 1989). In this condition, such seeds will withstand only very restricted dehydration before severely damaging or lethal effects occur, and consequently are described as being desiccation-sensitive (e.g. Chin and Roberts 1980). This is, in fact, the major criterion by which seeds of particular species are categorized as being recalcitrant. Although there is an enormous gap in dehydration response between recalcitrant and orthodox seeds, thus far only one further category has been formally defined--that comprised by seeds which will withstand a substantial degree of dehydration, but not to as low water contents as will orthodox types: these have been described as showing intermediate storage behaviour (e.g. Ellis et al. 1980), and those of tropical origin may, especially in the dehydrated condition, be adversely affected by chilling (Hong and Ellis 1996).Despite the non-orthodox behaviour of recalcitrant and intermediate seeds --and seeds of the many species that may fall somewhere between these two categories (Berjak and Pammenter 1994)--it is essential that storage strategies be developed, albeit that only short-term conservation for planting programmes and germplasm exchange be facilitated. The immediate problem is that recalcitrant seeds cannot be dehydrated to any water content which would allow low temperature -low RH storage, and it is likely that intermediate seeds of many species too could not withstand the conditions developed to optimize storage longevity for orthodox types.In fact, overcoming the problems associated with conservation of non-orthodox seeds has been a much-debated topic for at least two decades (e.g. Chin and Roberts 1980;Ouédraogo et al. 1996), but very little progress has been made in terms of improved shortterm storage of the intact propagules.As regards recalcitrant seeds, the only conservation strategy for the intact propagules involves their storage at high water contents (essentially undiminished from those characteristic of the newly shed/harvested condition), at the minimum temperature tolerated. In the case of many tropical species, however, these minima must be relatively high, as the seeds are chilling-sensitive. Even for seeds of temperate recalcitrant species, as the tissues are highly hydrated--and continue to be metabolic--storage at sub-zero temperatures is precluded. Low-temperature storage is also not an option for chilling-sensitive seeds showing intermediate post-harvest behaviour.The very conditions necessary for viability retention of recalcitrant, and probably most other non-orthodox seeds, are also those that facilitate fungal proliferation (Berjak 1996). Furthermore, any manipulations of such seeds, for example, attempting to lower the water content of recalcitrant types to prevent ongoing events of germinative metabolism, may well prove sufficiently stressful (Drew et al. 2000) to exacerbate the deleterious effects of seed-associated micro-organisms, particularly fungi. The same is likely to be the case for dehydrated intermediate seeds (Berjak 1996).During short-term storage of whole non-orthodox seeds, the proliferation of micro-organisms, particularly of fungi, must be curtailed. It is, of course, desirable that microbial propagules be eliminated completely from the seeds prior to storage, but this is extremely difficult to achieve. Long-term conservation of the genetic resources of species producing non-orthodox seeds is likely to be achieved only by cryostorage of suitably small explants, such as excised zygotic axes (Engelmann 1999). These must harbour no microbial propagules --particularly as all require a period in vitro following retrieval from cryostorage, during which any associated fungal or bacterial propagules will flourish. However, the advantage when working with isolated axes, is that these structures which are usually tightly enclosed by the surrounding tissues in the intact seed, are able to be surface-sterilized after excision.3 The nature of fungi on forest tree seeds One of the main features of forest tree seeds is their great diversity in size, shape and texture. The size and texture of tree seeds range from small and hard, as the seeds of Eucalyptus spp., to the relatively large and fleshy acorns of some Quercus spp. or hard walnuts of some Juglans spp. The longevity of tree seeds varies from a few days to many years.The main effects of seed-transmitted fungi are the diseases they cause, and to some extent also the reduced seed viability. However, they rarely destroy the seeds completely. Examples are Sphaeropsis sapinea, causing Diplodia shoot blight of pines and other conifers, Sirococcus conigenus, causing Sirococcus blight of pines and other conifers, Botryodiplodia theobromae, causing rots in a wide host range and many Fusarium spp. causing dampingoff of seedlings.Seed-borne micro-organisms may reduce germination and seed longevity in storage of all types of seeds. When seeds are moved internationally, pathogens may become a quarantine concern and jeopardize seed trade and germplasm exchange. The micro-organisms that are mostly associated with tree seeds are fungi, bacteria and, to a lesser extent, viruses. A comprehensive list was published by Mittal et al. (1990). Phytoplasmas, which are known to cause a number of so-called little leaf or witches' broom diseases, are not seed-borne due to the nature of their transmission (phloem-limited, and no connection from phloem to seeds). It is important to distinguish between seed-borne micro-organisms and seed-transmitted micro-organisms. The term seed-borne describes the state of any micro-organism being carried with, on or in the seed. The term seed-transmitted includes the act of infection of the seedlings from seed-borne inoculum. Thus seed-borne microorganisms include the pathogens causing plant diseases, the socalled 'field fungi' as well as the so-called 'storage fungi'.Examples for typical 'storage fungi' include Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp. and Caloscypha fulgens, the seed or cold fungus that kills pine seeds under cool conditions. Their main effect is to reduce seed viability, under certain conditions to even kill the seeds. Poor germination of seedlots can often be attributed to contamination with micro-organisms (e.g. Mwanza and Kellas 1987;Sutherland et al. 1987;Huang and Kuhlman 1990). Microorganisms in general thrive under conditions of high moisture and a temperature range between 20 and 25°C. These are also the conditions that ensure survival of recalcitrant seeds. Although few systematic surveys of the contamination of recalcitrant seeds with micro-organisms have been conducted (e.g. Mittal and Sharma 1983;Mycock and Berjak 1990;Pongpanich 1990), it appears that they suffer more from effects of micro-organisms on seed quality than orthodox seeds (Berjak 1996). In addition, recalcitrant seeds are more sensitive to common seed treatment with heat or fungicides. Recalcitrant seeds are often conserved in vitro, where particularly the storage fungi may cause problems by contaminating the media.There is a need to conduct more survey work on pathogens of recalcitrant tree seeds, both with regard to quality aspects and with regard to phytosanitary issues. It is very important to keep these two aspects separate in the evaluation of research results. Pest Risk Analysis (FAO 1996) can help in identifying pests of quarantine concern and in suggesting management options. Treatment techniques (chemical, biological or physical) that do not affect seed viability need to be identified.The majority of pathogens associated with forest tree seeds are fungi, producing only or predominantly the asexual (anamorph) stage (Deuteromycetes). There are exceptions though, as the oomycetes (Oomycota) or water moulds, which can be seedborne on hardwood seeds, e.g. Phytophthora cactorum on beechnuts (Prochazkova and Jancarek 1991). Except for Rhizoctonia spp. that are sometimes seed-borne and may have a basidiumproducing (Basidiomycotina) sexual stage, the reproductive spores or structures of other Basidiomycotina, are rarely found on tree seeds, and even when present, they are of no consequence. For example, Heterobasidion annosum, which causes root rots of forest trees, has been isolated from Abies sp. seeds (Mittal et al. 1990). However, there is no evidence of this or similar fungi affecting seeds or serving as inoculum to cause root rots. Although rust fungi, which are also Basidiomycotina, frequently attack conifer cones, seeds from diseased cones do not carry the pathogen.There are many mechanisms by which tree seeds acquire pathogens. Indeed, both the occurrence and severity of many seed-borne fungi, is often traced to the mishandling of fruits, cones or seeds. A major factor in the acquisition of seed-borne fungi is the contamination of fruits or cones with soil, as often occurs when they are collected from the forest floor, the ground beneath seed orchard trees, or when forest trees are felled to facilitate fruit or cone picking. Beechnuts (Fagus spp.), for example, collected from the forest floor may be infested with Phytophthora cactorum (Prochazkova and Jancarik 1991). Plastic netting can help reduce infection (Fig. 1). Improper handling of cones or fruits may also contribute to the occurrence of seed-borne fungi, when moulds build up on wet conifer cones stored for prolonged periods following collection. Storing cones wet can also increase temperature within the collection bags, further enhancing moulding. The inclusion of old, infested cones or fruits in current year 's collections, can be a source of seed-borne pathogens. Sirococcus blight of conifers, caused by S. conigenus, is a classic example. The pathogen occurs on old, pathogen-infested conifer cones, especially of spruces, Picea spp. Seedlots become affected when such cones, containing infected seeds, are included in collections of current year, disease-free cones. Another source of contamination results from improperly cleaned seedlots containing bits of pathogen-infested needles, leaves, cones or other debris and infected seeds.Seeds often carry fungi that are considered as saprophytes or weak pathogens, e.g. species of Penicillium or Aspergillus. Such so called 'storage fungi' are common on stored, but not fresh, seeds (Prochazkova, pers. comm.). This observation invariably leads to the question of what role these fungi play. Are they harmful or do they simply colonize weakened seeds? For example, seeds may be weakened by numerous factors, including long-term or improper storage, or high processing temperatures that are sometimes required for drying or opening cones. Seeds harbouring such fungi invariably germinate poorly or slowly, but it is hard to define the cause and effect. Not all seed-borne fungi are detrimental and sometimes they may be beneficial. For instance, Trichoderma harzianum is sold commercially as seed dressing to protect seeds and seedlings from damping-off and root rots. However, under optimal conditions even Trichoderma species may be pathogenic (Vaartaja 1957).Seed analysts are interested in detecting and defining the role of seed-borne pathogens but, except for seeds destined for export or import, it may be impractical to assay all seed lots. The following problems should be avoided when seeds are selected for storage: • Moulds on the fruits or cones from which the seeds originated. 4 Some general pre-assay considerationsBefore assaying for seed-borne pathogens, it is first necessary to obtain a representative seed sample. The most recent edition of the ISTA International Rules for Seed Testing (1999) and Edwards and Wang (1995) cite methods and equipment needed for seed sampling. We recommend that these procedures and recommendations for selection of reliable equipment be followed to guarantee the accuracy of the assays.The number of seeds required for testing is determined according to the expected incidence of the test pathogen in specific seed lots. In general, sample size depends upon the sensitivity required (the more seeds tested the greater the accuracy) and the availability of seed and resources available to process the samples. Determining proper sample size requires that preliminary assays be done to obtain data about the incidence of seed-borne pathogens present in seed lots. Once this information is obtained, sample size can be determined using a binomial distribution (Zar 1984). When using such procedures it is common for sample size to vary by pathogen, tree seed species and accuracy level desired. See Zar (1984) or other statistical texts for help in this area or consult a biometrician whenever there is doubt about the number of seeds needed for an assay. A rule of thumb: if 300 seeds are tested with a reliable method and found healthy, one can be 95% sure that the infection percentage is less than 1%, or: to be 95% sure that the infection in a seed lot is below 0.3%, one has to test 1000 seeds (Diekmann 1993).Another consideration is how to prepare the seeds for assay. Before testing forest seed it can be washed with water or disinfesting chemicals. Exposure to physical agents, such as heat, cold, scarification, or removal of the seed coat, may also be considered as pre-treatments of forest seed. Removing the seedcoat from small seeds is too tedious and time consuming to be justified. However, it may be worthwhile for large seeds such as acorns, particularly if the suspected pathogen is within seeds that have many surface fungi and bacteria. Seedcoats of hardwood seeds, or seedcoats adhering to hardwood germinants, must be removed before assaying for viruses. If the isolation medium is selective for a particular fungus or group of fungi it is often not necessary to surface-sterilize the seeds as the medium inhibits growth of most contaminants or stimulates the growth of the desired fungus. The most common surface disinfectant is ordinary bleach (NaOCl). While effective, bleach is also residual and so the treated materials must be washed two or three times with sterile water to remove the bleach, which would otherwise inhibit growth of the fungus. We have used 3-30% hydrogen peroxide for surface-sterilizing tree seeds (Sutherland et al. 1987). It works well and does not have to be washed off the seeds, but it is very corrosive and must be handled with extreme caution. Handling samples of small seeds is facilitated by using small, cylindrical-shaped (e.g. 5 cm long × 2 cm diameter) 'baskets' made from plastic window screen. The open end of the basket is plugged with a rubber stopper to keep the seeds in the basket that is moved in and out of surface disinfectants or washing water with laboratory tweezers.The protocol dictates the type of apparatus to be used for incubating seeds or seedlings. Most assays in which small to medium-sized seeds are incubated on blotter paper or agar media are done in 90 -100 mm diameter Petri plates. Large seeds require bigger containers. Ideally the incubation temperature should be optimum for growth of the target pathogen, but not for other fungi and bacteria. As fruiting bodies and spores are a prerequisite for fungus identification, sometimes methods to promote fungus sporulation may be required. These could be incubation of cultures in ambient daylight or under near ultraviolet (NUV) light ('black light'). Details are given for the respective species.The method to be used depends on the target pathogen(s), the purpose of testing, the accuracy level desired and cost. For the detection of ilarviruses and cucumoviruses, the immuno-enzymatic ELISA test is recommended, whereas the immuno-capture-reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (IC-RT-PCR) is used for detecting a nepovirus. The dot blot nucleic acid hybridization technique can be used for detecting tobamoviruses in oaks and maples. Reeves (1995) reviewed various immunological and nucleic acid methods for detecting seed-borne fungi, bacteria and viruses. As Maude (1996) points out, these techniques are used for detecting fungi in soil and diseased plants, but seldom used in assays for seed-borne fungi. This is mainly because existing tests for detecting fungi on seeds, including blotter tests and use of selective media, are fairly effective and cheaper to develop and use. However, this does not preclude the need for developing molecular assays for fungi and other pathogens on tree seeds. Simple and reliable procedures are needed, especially for testing seed health of tree species which are widely used in large scale re-and afforestation programmes (Mohanan and Sharma 1991). Already some progress has been made in this direction with the development of monoclonal antibody protocols for detecting Sirococcus conigenus on spruce seeds (Mitchell and Sutherland 1986;Mitchell 1988). One of the main advantages of molecular techniques is that they are much more sensitive than existing procedures. Consequently, extremely low levels of seed-borne pathogens can be detected with these advanced techniques, which is particularly important to certify seed for export, or even for long-distance movement within countries, to minimize the risk of disseminating seed-borne pathogens.5 General protocols for detecting fungiBefore proceeding to more elaborate procedures, first examine dry seeds using a magnifying lens or stereomicroscope. Seeds that are mouldy (Fig. 2), cracked or broken (Fig. 3), or which have insect damage (Fig. 4) are easily detected. Poor quality seed lots may contain small or abnormal seed. Resin drops (Fig. 5) on conifer seeds indicate the cones or seeds were subjected to excessively high temperatures during processing. If so, the seeds may be weakened and thus susceptible to saprophytes and opportunistic pathogens and not suitable for long-term storage in genebanks. Bits of pathogen-infested needles and leaves and other debris (Figs 6 and 7) can also be seen, as can sclerotia (Fig. 8) and other fungal structures. Poor quality seedlots may contain many small or abnormally shaped seeds. Radiographs reveal many of the same problems and, in addition, help to detect minute cracks in seedcoats, internal insects or abnormal contents of pathogen-infected seeds which would otherwise go undetected. Poor quality seed should be discarded. Recommended for detecting surface-contaminating fungus spores on seeds The seeds are placed in a flask or other container with water and shaken. For a quantitative test, seed weight and water volume should be known, e.g. 50 g seeds and 50 ml water. Spore counts with the help of a haemocytometer can be calculated as number of spores per millilitre of water, which then equals the number of spores per gram of seed. Adding a drop or two of detergent helps dislodge spores from seeds, but it may create foaming problems. If a low spore load is expected, the seed washings should be centrifuged and the sediment examined by compound microscope for spores. Yuan et al. (1990) used 50 seeds of Acacia spp., 200 mg of Casuarina spp. and 100 mg of Eucalyptus spp. seeds each in 10 ml of water shaken on a 'wrist action shaker' for 10 min. Suspensions of particulate matter were decanted from the seed washings and centrifuged 5 min at 5000 rpm. A compound microscope and haemocytometer were used to examine the sediment in the tubes for spores. Using this procedure they detected Pestalotiopsis sp. and Ulocladium sp. in seed washings of all three tree genera and Phoma sp. was found in washings from Casuarina cunninghamiana and several Eucalyptus species. Other fungi detected in washings (tree seed species not given) were Curvularia lunata, Drechslera spicifera and Penicillium sp.With valuable germplasm, this method helps reduce the number of test seeds. Germinate the seeds according to recognized protocols, usually the ISTA rules (1999). During or at the end of the test, remove and identify the fungi that grow on the seeds or germinants. Transfer those that do not sporulate to PDA, malt agar or other culture media to induce sporulation. However, these recommendations vary according to the test species. For instance, seed may be germinated on top of, or between, paper, in sand, or seed may be soaked in concentrated phosphoric acid or water. Some tree seed requires 14-70 days of incubation before germination can be evaluated.A major advantage of this procedure is that it is carried out concurrently with routine germination tests. Thus, except for microscopes and references needed to identify the fungi, other equipment and resource requirements are minimal. Other advantages are that many of the fungi sporulate on the seeds or germinants, and so it is usually not necessary to subculture them on agar or other culture media to induce sporulation. It is also easy to relate and quantify fungus occurrence and abundance to diseases such as seed decay and radicle rot. Some disadvantages are that fastgrowing, saprophytic fungi may obscure pathogen growth and the test is not specific for detecting one or a group of pathogens. Prochazkova and Jancarik (1991) used this technique to identify 141 fungi in almost 6000 conifer seedlots and 170 fungi in over 2200 broadleaf seedlots. The conifer seeds were Abies alba, A. concolor and A. grandis, Larix decidua, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Picea abies, P. glauca, P. omorika, P. pungens and P. sitchensis and Pinus sylvestris, P. nigra, P. strobus, P. mugo var. mughus, P. mugo var. uncinata, P. cembra, and P. contorta. Some of the pathogenic fungi isolated were Botrytis species from species of Picea, Pinus and Larix, Fusarium spp. from species of Pseudotsuga, Pinus and Larix and Verticillium spp. from Pinus and Larix spp. The hardwood seeds assayed were Alnus glutinosa and A. viridis, Betula verrucosa, Carpinus betulus, Fagus sylvatica, Fraxinus excelsior, F. americana and F. angustifolia, Sorbus aucuparia, Tilia cordata and T. platyphyllos and Ulmus glabra. Among the pathogenic fungi obtained were Ciboria alni, C. batschiana and C. betulae from the seeds of species of Alnus and Betula (<1% of the seedlots tested), respectively. Fusarium spp. were detected in all the hardwood seedlots, especially Fraxinus sp. seeds where >50% of the lots were infested. Rhizoctonia solani was obtained from <1% of the beechnut seedlots. The grey mould pathogen, Botrytis cinerea, was found in over two-thirds of the Carpinus betulis seedlots. Trichoderma viride, which is often associated with poor quality seeds, occurred on over 40% of the Pseudotsuga, Larix and Carpinus seedlots, 30% of the Tilia lots, and 15 -30% of the lots of Acer, Quercus and Sorbus.Sometimes pathogens may be detected in tests that are made in conjunction with routine germination tests. For example, cross or longitudinal sections of seeds that germinate poorly are often cut with a razor or scalpel blade to determine embryo development and size. Internal seed decay and presence of moulds can often be seen in such sectionsRecommended for detecting a wide variety of fungi in or on hardwood and conifer seeds. Place seeds on water-soaked blotter paper in sterilized Petri dishes or other such containers. Tap water can be used as long as it is boiled for 10 min. Sterile water safeguards against contamination by waterborne fungi. Incubate the seeds at 20 -25°C, or temperatures favouring the suspected pathogen, for one to two weeks, or until fungi develop. They can then be identified using the fruiting bodies or spores on the paper, seeds or germinants (Fig. 9), or removed and plated onto a culture medium to induce sporulation. The principle here is that seeds are kept in a humid environment favouring fungus development. The technique is thus similar to that of detecting pathogens during routine seed germination tests and so it is not surprising that the two assays detect many of the same fungi. The major advantage of the blotter test is that it more flexible, e.g. it can be used to assay one to several seedlots using incubation temperatures and lighting regimes that favour fungus detection over seed germination. Another advantage is that it is possible to relate pathogen occurrence and abundance to seed decay and other damage. Sometimes agricultural seeds are killed or weakened by freezing or herbicides, to enhance pathogen development, before being placed on the blotter papers (Maude 1996). Working with both non-and surface-sterilized seeds Sharma and Mohamed Ali (1997) used the blotter technique to isolate a variety of non-pathogenic, potentially pathogenic and pathogenic fungi, e.g. Fusarium solani, F. moniliforme and Botryodiplodia theobromae, from seeds of the tropical hardwoods Lagerstroemia microcarpa and Pterocarpus marsupium. As in this case seeds may be surface-sterilized before being assayed or the seedcoat can be removed from large seeds with profuse surface contamination. This technique is easy to use and requires minimal equipment; however, rapidly growing saprophytes or weak pathogens such as species of Penicillium, Trichoderma or Aspergillus may overgrow certain pathogens. Also, pathogens such as Phytophthora that may lack conspicuous spores and vegetative growth can go undetected. 6 Specific protocols for detecting fungi in non-orthodox seedsAn in-depth study on the effects of fungi during hydrated storage of Avicennia marina has proved very revealing of the significant role of mycoflora in promoting deterioration of recalcitrant seeds (Calistru et al. 2000). In that study, after pericarp removal, handharvested seeds were treated initially and periodically during hydrated storage by aerosol spraying with a relatively effective fungicide, Previcur N (see below for details). The peculiar morphology of A. marina seeds (see Farrant et al. 1993 for diagrammatic details) allows fungicide, applied as a fine spray, access to the inner cotyledonary surfaces as well as to the exterior of much of the embryonic axis. The results showed unequivocally that this treatment, which continued to curtail fungal activity, extended the storage lifespan of these 'clean' seeds by almost 50% compared with previous studies in which no equivalent measures were taken (e.g. Berjak et al. 1989). In the investigations of Calistru et al. (2000), seeds that had been initially treated with the fungicide, but then inoculated with Fusarium moniliforme, were all dead within a third of the time for which the 'clean' seeds remained vigorous and showed high viability. In the experimentally infected seeds, rapid fungal proliferation occurred, and was accompanied by profound deterioration of both cotyledonary and embryonic axis cells. What was a highly significant finding though, was that if the seeds had been stored 'clean' for a few days prior to being experimentally infected with F. moniliforme, then they were considerably more resilient to fungal depredation, arguing for the development of active defence mechanisms as germinative metabolism progressed under hydrated conditions. This response, however, postponed rather than prevented the seemingly inevitable fungal degradation and viability loss of the stored seeds.The change in susceptibility of the seeds to fungal attack underscores the importance of developmental stage in these actively metabolic plant propagatory units. Even in the 'clean' seeds though, inherent infection by F. moniliforme was not completely eliminated, becoming apparent in localized association with only cotyledonary surfaces, about half way through the experimental storage period although there was no vigorous fungal proliferation. This was the situation in 30% of the 'clean' seed population by the end of the storage period when viability (perhaps, or perhaps not, coincidentally) was 70%. Electron microscopical studies showed that cotyledonary cells contiguous with the fungal mycelium were extensively degraded but, significantly, cells of the embryonic axis with which no mycelium was associated also showed marked deteriorative changes.This study confirms the premise (Berjak 1996) that active fungal metabolism during hydrated storage of recalcitrant seeds would impose significant limitations --not only on the total (storage) lifespan --but also on seed vigour, and thus quality. The findings underscore the necessity of finding whatever solutions may be possible, to curtail the incidence --or ideally, to eliminate --the associated fungi from recalcitrant, and all other non-orthodox seeds, prior to storage.Fungal propagules may gain access to the seed tissues at any time from flowering to the post-shedding phase. Recalcitrant seeds may be internally infected by fungi ab initio by systemic transmission via the parent plant, as has been shown for developing maize caryopses, which are orthodox (Mycock and Berjak 1992;Kabeere et al. 1997), or through the stigma-style continuum during flowering (Marsh and Payne 1984). The problem with infection that has originated in these ways during seed development, is that the mycelium has the opportunity to become established deep within the tissyitself --and is consequently very difficult (if not impossible) to eradicate. As is the case for orthodox seeds, insects may both cause damage and act directly as vectors for fungal propagules during seed development. Recalcitrant (and probably all non-orthodox) seeds offer a further advantage to opportunistic invading fungi, in that being shed at high water content, they are very prone to contamination once on the ground (see below) or in storage containers. If the seeds are collected soon after shedding, however, such fungal propagules may be only peripherally located and easy to eradicate if prompt action is taken. Additionally, of course, the storage containers and all devices used to elevate the seeds within them, must be rigorously sterilized.In Durban, South Africa, scientists have worked with nonorthodox seeds of a wide variety of species and, although the proportion harbouring fungi and/or bacteria varied from one batch to another, some contamination was invariable. In general, fungi were the major contaminants of recalcitrant seeds of tropical, sub-tropical and temperate southern African origin but frequently bacteria occurred as co-contaminants (Mycock and Berjak 1990). These findings have been consistent for tropical and temperate species since then, and we have become particularly aware of the problem since embarking on cryopreservation of embryonic axes excised from a variety of recalcitrant seed species (Berjak et al. 1999a,b). Our experience with intermediate seeds has been limited, but in the case of extensive trials with coffee seeds where fungi could be controlled, bacteria posed an almost intractable problem (unpublished data). It should be noted though that seed-associated micro-organisms are not confined to recalcitrant and other nonorthodox types originating only in the tropical to warm temperate zones (see below). It is possible, however, that the spectrum of fungal species may differ with seed provenance where the geographical localities are widely separated (Table 1). As an example (although specific relationships among seed and fungal species cannot be ruled out as the present state of knowledge is scanty), it seems that recalcitrant seeds harvested in 1990 in southern Africa harboured a basically common spectrum of fungi (Mycock and Berjak 1990), which was essentially different from that associated with seeds collected in the Asia-Pacific region (Pongpanich 1990). In a few instances, particular fungal genera have been isolated from seeds of both cool temperate regions and widely separated tropical/subtropical zones (Table 1). This is the case for Phomopsis spp., which were associated with a low percentage of acorns (Quercus spp., Kehr and Schroeder 1996); some species of the Dipterocarpaceae (Pongpanich 1990); Trichilia dregeana (Meliaceae, our unpublished data); Hevea brasiliensis (Singh and Singh 1990); as well as with neem (Azadirachta indica, Sateesh and Shankara Bhat 1999). However, although identifications to the fungus species level were not presented for all the seeds from which Phomopsis was isolated, it is likely that these were different: for example, the species isolated from seeds of commercial rubber and of neem, were P. heveae and P. azadirachtae, respectively. In contrast, while Phytophthora spp. have not been generally recorded as being associated with recalcitrant seeds, this genus has been shown to be seed-transmitted in Ghana, where it poses a serious threat to Theobroma cacao causing black pod, which is a wide spread and destructive disease of cocoa (Kumi et al. 1996).In the southern African context, Mycock and Berjak (1990) investigated the fungal status of newly harvested recalcitrant seeds of seven unrelated species, ranging in provenance from sub-tropical salt-water estuaries to warm-temperate montane areas. These were: Avicennia marina, Castanospermum australe, Litchi chinensis, Podocarpus henkelii (a gymnosperm), Landolpia kirkii, Scadoxus membranaceus and Camellia sinensis. The findings were that Fusarium spp. were present on, or in, the tissues in all but one (L. kirkii, a latex-producing species possessed also of apocyanaceous alkaloids) and that species of Alternaria, Cladosporium, Aspergillus and Penicillium with Fusarium spp. dominated the spectrum of fungi associated with the fresh seeds. Although, unfortunately, in that study fungi were generally not identified to species level, it was unequivocally established that none was of the xerotolerant group collectively described as the seed storage fungi (e.g. Christensen and Kaufmann 1974). Reference to Table 1 shows that the only storage fungi that have been recorded among the many major isolates, are Aspergillus flavus group species in association with seeds of the Dipterocarpaceae (Mittal and Sharma 1982;Pongpanich 1990) and those of Hevea brasiliensis (Singh and Singh 1990).The relative absence of demonstrable storage fungi in association with recalcitrant seeds is not surprising. This ecological grouping comprises xerotolerant species (mainly of Aspergillus and Penicillium) which generally become apparent on, and in, the tissues of air-dry orthodox seeds in storage (Christensen and Kaufmann 1974), when the competition imposed by the so-called field fungi is curtailed by the low water activity and osmotic challenges of seeds stored at low RH. It is probable though that in intermediate seeds dehydrated to relatively low water contents xerotolerant storage fungal species may manifest themselves, provided that their propagules are present intra-seminally, or in the storage containers. The field fungi, in contrast, require relatively high seed-water contents in order to proliferate--which are precisely those necessary to maintain viability of metabolically active, recalcitrant seeds in storage (Berjak 1996). Whereas species of Fusarium, Cladosporium and Alternaria are considered to be major components of the field fungi on, and in, developing and newly harvested orthodox seeds, this does not preclude others. The essential differences between orthodox seeds--which become increasingly inert--and recalcitrant types, which continue to be actively metabolic, are basic to the spectrum of seed-associated fungi that will be manifested.In fact, unless they are dormant, recalcitrant seeds might be described as seeds in name only, and are actually far more like seedlings once they have been shed. In many cases, the metabolism associated with their development graduates without any obvious marker event into that of germination (Berjak et al. 1989;Farrant et al. 1989;Pammenter et al. 1994). As a consequence, it may be reasonable to suppose that these propagatory units would be open to invasion by a broad spectrum of fungal species, and not only those classically considered to be field fungi. This is borne out by a consideration of the range comprising the mycoflora found to be associated with some of the few species of recalcitrant seeds that have been examined: the spectrum of fungi is, in fact, considerably more extensive than those listed as major isolates in Table 1.A further complication is that whatever associated fungi are isolated at any one stage of recalcitrant seed development, the composition of the mycoflora is likely to be different at other stages, both before and after the seeds are shed from the parent plant. This is well illustrated by the information from Kehr and Shroeder (1996) that the most virulent of the primary pathogens, Ciboria batschiana, associated with seeds of temperate Quercus spp., infects the acorns only after they have been shed onto the soil. Our studies on the stored seeds of four species of tropical or warm temperate origin showed that whereas a mixed mycoflora occurred when the seeds were newly shed, the spectrum narrowed to become dominated by Fusarium spp. during storage (Mycock and Berjak 1990). A recent, major survey on fungi associated with developing and mature fruits and seeds and shed seeds of Trichilia dregeana has been very revealing of the changing nature of the mycoflora (Table 1). Lack of overt disease symptoms is also no guarantee that the seeds are not infected: the embryos of the majority of seeds of Theobroma cacao --97% --were found to be infected by Phytophthora, although taken from fruits which were symptomless for black pod (Kumi et al. 1996).In the case of Trichilia dregeana, many of the fungi associated with immature or mature fruits were not transmitted to the seeds, although in most cases these were isolated from the interior of the pericarp. These included Alternaria spp. and notably A. alternata, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides group species, Penicillium aurantiogriseum, Pestalotiopsis maculans and Rhizopus nigricans. However, in other cases, fungal species isolated from fruit tissues during seed development, were isolated from the arils of the seeds after they had been shed: the fungi concerned were a Colletotrichum species, Fusarium semitectum, F. solani, F. subglutinans and two Penicillium species. Seeds of T. dregeana are enclosed by a substantial waxy aril which, in the shortest-term, might prove to be a barrier to the ingress of fungal structures to the seed tissues themselves. In the trials with these seeds only one species each of Phoma and Phomopsis, isolated from the fruit tissues during development, became associated with seed tissues, sensu stricto, after shedding. However, what seems to be the case from these studies on fruits and seeds of T. dregeana is that the fungi that ultimately became seed-associated were the more serious in terms of their potential pathogenicity.This would have serious consequences in terms of even shortterm storage of these seeds as, if they are kept enclosed for even a few hours after collection, the mycofloral propagules in the aril proliferate vigorously, enveloping the seeds in a mass of mycelium. However, it is vital in terms of T. dregeana seed survival, that water content is not lowered (Drew et al. 2000) and the intact aril initially serves as a device limiting water loss. However, for storage, the solution to the problem posed by the fungi is for aril removal before the seeds are enclosed at high RH (in fact, in a saturated atmosphere) for storage. This is achieved by soaking the seeds in water for a short time, which softens the aril and allows its removal by gentle rubbing. Thereafter, the seed surfaces have been successfully treated with a Benlate-type fungicide (Fundazol WP, Sanachem, South Africa [active ingredient, benomyl/benzimidazole]) which has ensured their survival for several months under conditions permitting no water loss. However, if the mycelium is internal, then neither this approach--nor any other so far attempted--will facilitate storage of T. dregeana seeds, and the same is true for those of all other species. However, it is notable that in no case were any fungi isolated from the axis tissues among the many hundreds of T. dregeana seeds used for the trials reported here. This is, however, not always the case: the situation varies from season to season and from one seed-collection locality to another, and there have been instances where T. dregeana seeds collected have harboured serious internal fungal infections, which (thus far) we have found to be irremedial and, in the current season, unusually the bacteria have posed a considerable problem after anti-fungal treatments have been used.In cases of established internal fungal infections, the application of systemic types of fungicides may prove effective, considering that recalcitrant (and other non-orthodox) seeds are hydrated when they are shed. Such procedures would necessarily require that the seeds are dried back to the original water contents, as otherwise the problem of their germination in storage would be exacerbated.A very important aspect of drying back, however, is that even if overall seed water content appears to be the same as the initial value, generally that of the embryonic axes is higher than it was before treatment. One must be aware of the fact that for most species, the embryonic axis is only an insignificant fraction of the total seed mass or volume; hence its water content per se will make a negligible contribution to that of the whole seed. Yet it is the degree of hydration of the axis that primarily determines the metabolic events that will occur, so elevated axis water contents may mean that germinative metabolism is facilitated at an increased rate, thus limiting even further the storage lifespan of the seeds. Additionally, elevated water content of the axis may well encourage fungal activity, if any inoculum remains in its vicinity. Therefore, assessment of the extent of drying back needs to be carried out on the separated seed components, until the water content of the embryonic axes approximates to pre-treatment levels. With this proviso in mind, trials with a range of systemic fungicides urgently need to be undertaken for a variety of seed species, to ascertain whether or not this approach could usefully extend their hydrated lifespan, essentially by curbing the proliferation of internally seed-borne fungi.The essential approach must encompass application of anti-fungal measures when the seeds are newly harvested, and preferably, they should be harvested directly from the parent plant, so as to obviate contact with the reservoir of fungal propagules in the soil. This principle is well-illustrated in the report of Kehr and Schroeder (1996) who showed that although the incidence of fungal colonization by a variety of species (Table 1) increased steadily through the pericarp and cotyledons during maturation on the parent oak tree, it was only after these fruits were shed that the aggressive primary pathogen, Ciboria batschiana, infected the acorns.The fungicide(s) of choice must be arrived at by identifying the fungi concerned, as well as by testing seed tolerance to its application. As much of the fungal inoculum may be located in the seed coverings, it is expedient to remove these structures, as also suggested by Bonner (1996) but only if this can be done noninjuriously and without curtailing the duration in hydrated storage or causing any damage to the seeds themselves. We have found this to be a beneficial procedure for the recalcitrant seeds of several species. However, the now-exposed seed surfaces must be sterilized, which itself can be a damaging procedure if it is overrigorous or otherwise too harsh (Berjak et al. 1999a, b). Where it has been ascertained that there is no inoculum harboured internally, then surface application of fungicide will suffice, for example, in the case of seeds of Trichilia dregeana (see above). In this case, application of a benomyl preparation, Fundazol WP (Sanachem, South Africa), proved effective. However, in experiments with seeds of Avicennia marina, dusting of the exposed seed surfaces with this fungicide or Benlate (DuPont, USA) was very damaging. As an alternative, aerosol application of the fungicide, Previcur N as a solution (2.5 g l -1 ), proved non-injurious and relatively effective (Calistru et al. 2000--see above). Previcur (active ingredient propamocarb--HCl [AgrEvo, South Africa]) appears to have a definite potential as a systemic fungicide for the treatment of recalcitrant (and other non-orthodox) seeds prior to storage, and trials on its use alone, or in combination with other fungicides, are presently being undertaken. As Previcur proved to be fungistatic rather than fungicidal in relation to Fusarium moniliforme (Calistru et al. 2000), these trials incorporate the use of 'cocktails': in particular, combinations of Previcur and Fundazol or Benlate, and Previcur with Early Impact (Zeneca Agrochemicals, South Africa), are being tested. Early Impact (active ingredients flutriafol [triazole] and carbendazim [benzamidazole]) is being used to replace benomyl fungicides, where these appear to be damaging.Where the fungi are principally located in the seed coverings, their removal and surface-sterilization of the underlying tissues (as in the case of Trichilia dregeana) may be relatively effective in curtailing the problems caused by the mycoflora during hydrated storage. However, it may be advantageous to provide such seeds with an artificial covering, especially one in which a fungicide can be incorporated, or which has natural fungicidal properties. In this regard, the use of alginate gel offers a convenient mode of seed encapsulation. However, it is essential that the degree of hydration of the gel be controlled, so not to afford a source of additional water to the seeds, which would accelerate germinative metabolism in the storage containers.In Durban, South Africa the research group has access to a crude alginate gel which is custom-made from a brown alga. We are presently experimenting with this gel as an encapsulation medium for de-coated recalcitrant seeds of a variety of species, and have found its use highly effective in significantly extending the storage lifespan of some species. Interestingly, this effect for Avicennia marina, could not be correlated with any metabolic parameters of the seeds, but no fungal proliferation occurred during hydrated storage lifespan --which was extended fourfold in comparison with unencapsulated seeds (Motete et al. 1997).This is another approach that should be tested for non-orthodox seeds of any species, prior to their hydrated storage. In fact, this should be the first possibility to be assessed, although its success is far from assured in all cases (see below). Thermotherapy, however, has been extremely successful in the treatment of seeds of Quercus spp. prior to storage of the acorns. This approach, which was developed by Delatour (1978), involves submerging the acorns in water held at temperatures of around 40°C for 2 h. As discussed above, it is essential that the seeds are then dried back to acceptable storage water contents. Kehr and Schroeder (1996) showed that many of the fungi associated with Q. robur acorns were eliminated by thermotherapy, for example, Cladosporium cladosporioides, which originally occurred as a pericarp and cotyledon infection in 13% and 12%, respectively, of the seeds tested. Notably, those authors reported that Ciboria batschiana, although its incidence was very low initially (Table 1), was also eliminated. Delatour et al. (1980), who stored treated acorns with the further precaution of inclusion of a thiram-based fungicide (TMTD) in the water during thermotherapy (39°C, 8 h), showed zero recurrence of infection by C. batschiana after an 8-month period. It is notable that in those studies, C. batschiana was isolated from 36% of the acorns prior to treatment. The incidence of other fungi has been found to be significantly diminished by thermotherapy of acorns: for example, Kehr and Schroeder (1996) reported that Alternaria alternata, which was isolated at 48% from pericarps and 20% from cotyledons of control Q. robur, occurred in 26% and 4% of the pericarp and cotyledonary samples tested, following thermotherapy.However, thermotherapy is not a 'cure-all' for all seed-associated fungal species: Penicillium spp., for example, increased in incidence to 21% and 7% in acorn pericarps and cotyledons after thermotherapy, compared with their isolation from 6% and 9% of these structures, respectively, before the hot-water treatment (Kehr and Schroeder, 1996). It is probable that the Penicillium spp. present, which could obviously tolerate the 41°C thermotherapy, could proliferate far more readily in the absence of certain of the fungal species that were eliminated or reduced by the treatment.In other cases, thermotherapy just cannot be used. Work on seeds of Avicennia marina, showed them to be far more sensitive to elevated temperatures than were the fungi that they harboured. The seeds were found to be lethally damaged at temperatures of 45°C, while the virulent strain of Fusarium moniliforme that was isolated from them, could withstand temperatures in excess of 60°C (our unpublished data). A vital aspect of thermotherapy trials for nonorthodox seeds therefore, is that at the outset tolerance of the seeds themselves to various temperatures for different periods of time, must be assessed. Additionally, testing the effect of various combinations of temperature and time tolerated by the seeds, on the fungi isolated from those seeds, is ultimately a time-saving and rational preliminary approach.Are there other treatments that could be used to eliminate or curtail the fungi associated with recalcitrant seeds during hydrated storage? Again, it is impossible to generalize: Kehr and Schroeder (1996) have discussed the possibility of cold-hardening acorns, so that they will tolerate lower storage temperatures than if untreated. Those authors cite the possibility that Q. robur acorns might survive storage at -9°C, while those of Q. petraea could survive at -5 to -6°C. Such treatment would go far to minimize fungal effects during seed storage, but it must be borne in mind that Quercus spp. are temperate, and are not chilling-sensitive in the first place. It would be surprising if non-orthodox seeds of tropical/subtropical species could be so-acclimated.Another approach suggested as promising for acorns by Kehr and Schroeder (1996) is the use of what has been termed ETS (electron treatment of seeds). While those authors report that this approach has been developed in Germany for control of seedborne pathogens in cereal seeds, it is noteworthy that its use for improvement of maize seeds was first reported by Pammenter et al. in 1974. Those authors, who termed the technique 'cathodic protection' showed a dramatic improvement in vigour and viability retention of the caryopses during storage on a negatively charged conductor, under age-accelerating conditions, but ascribed the benefit to free-radical reducing effects in the seeds themselves. This does not, of course, rule out the possible effectiveness of the treatment by reducing the incidence of seedassociated fungi and their metabolic effects, especially as freeradical generation is considered to be one of the deleterious consequences in the host tissue of fungal metabolism.It is, however, presently considered unlikely that this type of approach will protect recalcitrant seeds. In the first place, even if electron treatment were to affect peripherally located fungi, in many cases in recalcitrant seeds the fungi occur in the deeper seed tissues. Secondly--and what may be a more important consideration--is the fact that cereal seeds are orthodox and dry, but the associated mycoflora is hydrated and active, which may well be the basis for its destruction by the applied charge, as has been proposed for the success of thermotherapy of superficially wetted maize caryopses (Berjak et al. 1992). Recalcitrant seeds, in contrast, are relatively highly hydrated and metabolically active, and it is essential that they remain so. It is thought likely, therefore, that such treatment might be as deleterious to the seeds as it could be to peripherally located mycoflora. However, in the case of nonorthodox seeds that will withstand dehydration--e.g. intermediate seeds --ETS might well be effective, but perhaps only if any inoculum present is peripherally located.A further approach, mentioned by Kehr and Schroeder (1996) as apparently having a beneficial effect on the elimination of fungi from acorns, is the use of combined microwave/steam treatment. However, as the basis of microwave activity resides in water (and lipid) heating, one must be critically aware of the possible deleterious effects on the seed tissues. The balance among microwave intensity, the duration of its application and seed water content, is absolutely critical: for example, without the provision of an energy-absorbing buffer, application of microwave therapy to soybeans at the low water content around 0.08 g g -1 for less than 30 s, has been found to cause seed bursting (Reddy et al. 2000). Recalcitrant seeds are generally large and have water contents anywhere in the range of approximately 0.3 g g -1 -0.45 g g -1 depending on the species and the developmental status (personal observations). As such, it is difficult to envisage the successful use of microwave energy to eliminate fungi that are located anywhere other than in the peripheral seed tissues. This is because the time taken for the interior of the seed to be sufficiently affected by the microwave energy to eliminate deep-seated inoculum would presumably devastate the peripheral tissues, but more significantly, unless the surface were perforated, the build-up of steam within the seed, would be likely to cause bursting. Bonner (1996), in discussing possible treatment of non-orthodox seeds against seed-borne pathogens and non-pathogenic microorganisms, mentions the problem of their internal localization. That author makes the point that, because of the nature of the seeds which is so different from orthodox types, gaseous fumigants are also not an option for recalcitrant seeds.In terms of fungal isolations and diagnoses that have been reported, in some instances there is a commonality with the methods reported elsewhere in this publication for fungi associated with orthodox seeds. This is the case for species of e.g. Fusarium, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Colletotrichum and Phytophthora.In other cases, specific or general isolation media are described or mentioned. For the mycoflora of acorns, Kehr and Schroeder (1996) used 2% malt agar containing 50 mg l -1 streptomycin, with the subculture of developing fungal colonies on malt agar: these were induced to sporulate after growth for two weeks (at room temperature) by maintaining the cultures for a week at 15°C under black light (Philips UVA 40W/08). Delatour et al. (1980) mention culturing Ciboria batschiana in tubes on malt agar. Kumi et al. (1996) have detailed the medium they used for selective isolation of Phytophthora spp. Washed seeds removed from newly opened cocoa fruits were surface sterilized with 93% alcohol (presumably ethanol) and incubated singly in Petri dishes on the following medium: 23 g l -1 Lima Bean agar (Difco Bacto) containing 10 mg each of pimaricin and benomyl, 200 mg vancomycin, 50 mg hymexazol, 60 mg each chloramphenicol and penicillin G. Incubation was for 3-5 days, in 12 h alternating cycles of NUV light and dark. Certain of the isolations were made from separated seed components.In work on the fungal flora of dipterocarp seeds in general (Pongpanich 1990), Shorea robusta, in particular (Mittal and Sharma 1982) and Hevea brasiliensis [Euphorbiaceae] (Singh and Singh 1990), aside from using the blotter test, all authors also used PDA plates as the agar method of choice. Isolation of Phomopsis azadirachtae and other fungi from neem seeds, Sateesh and Bhat (1999) used a standard agar method based on Czapek-Dox medium.For recalcitrant seeds of the various species studied in Durban, South Africa, the general approach is to isolate fungi from separated components (coverings, storage tissues [cotyledons/endosperm] and embryonic axes). For all isolations other than those from the outer surfaces of the pericarp, the seeds/seed components are surfacesterilized, generally using 1% sodium hypochlorite with a trace of a wetting agent such as Tween 20 (15 drops l -1 sterilant). The duration of surface sterilization varies from 10 to 25 min, depending on the material and the effectiveness of this treatment. Generally PDA is used for the initial isolations, and when necessary for identification, sub-culturing onto other media is carried out.For fungal isolation from fruit and seed material of Trichilia dregeana, initial isolation was in Petri dishes on Czapek-Dox (CDA) medium containing 50 µg ml -1 rifampicin. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 6.6 prior to autoclaving, and the filtersterilized rifampicin added after the autoclaved medium had cooled. Cultures were incubated for 5 -10 days in the dark at 25-27°C. The initial isolates were sub-cultured onto CDA to obtain axenic cultures for expert identification. These, in turn, were sub-cultured onto malt extract agar slants, for storage at 4-5°C: stored cultures were sub-cultured every 2-3 months, and re-stored after initial incubation at 25 -27°C for 7 days in the dark.As has emerged from the limited investigations on the fungal problem in non-orthodox seeds generally, and recalcitrant seeds in particular, there is little pattern in the presence of seed-associated fungi, whether pathogens (sensu Plant Pathology) or not. However, irrespective of the pathogenic status of the fungi, the high RH conditions necessary for recalcitrant seed storage demand that the primary approach must be to develop treatments that will ideally eliminate, but at least curtail, the mycoflora. Certainly at present, such treatments will have to be determined empirically, on a seed-species basis--but also taking into account the prevalent fungal species.Thus, unlike the situation in orthodox seed health testing, it is not so much a matter of what seed-associated fungi are present--and hence of diagnosis --but the imperative of the development of seed treatments, if any reasonable opportunity of short-term seed storage and exchange is envisaged. Hence: 1. the infection status of the seeds needs to be ascertained, on the basis of the separated components (seed coverings, storage tissues, embryonic axes); 2. expert identification of axenic isolates should be made; 3. suitable surface-sterilization procedures need to be established; 4. the effects of removal of the seed coverings must be ascertained; 5. experimentation with artificial seed coverings should be undertaken; 6. extensive experimentation with fungicide treatments is required, particularly concentrated on the possibility of using systemic fungicides; 7. the possible use of thermotherapy requires to be assessed; 8. other treatments should also be entertained; 9. if effective fungicidal treatments can be developed, then it might be necessary (e.g. if in vitro culture is to be used, as in the case of cryostorage) to develop suitable anti-bacterial treatments.7 Isolation of fungiMany pathogenic and non-pathogenic species of Fusarium (Deuteromycotina, Hyphomycetes) occur on and in tree seeds. For example, Ciesla et al. (1996) reported seven Fusarium spp. from eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.) seeds while Mittal et al. (1990) list 29 Fusarium spp. or f. sp. on numerous species of tree seeds. In one study alone, Prochazkova and Jancarik (1991) isolated 28 Fusarium spp. from seeds of many temperate broadleaf and conifer species.While not all seed-borne Fusarium spp. are pathogenic, at least under the conditions tested to date (e.g. Axelrood et al. 1995), many cause seed rots, damping-off (Fig. 10), root rots (Fig. 11) and blights in nurseries (e.g. James et al. 1991). Others, including the pine pitch canker pathogen F. subglutinans f. sp. pini, affect older trees (Barrows-Broaddus 1987; Diekmann and Sutherland 1998). While Fusarium spp. can be detected on seeds during routine germination or by the blotter test, it is best to isolate the fungus directly from seeds using selective media (Fig. 12). When surface contamination is severe, seeds can be surface-sterilized before plating them onto the medium or the seedcoat can be removed from large seeds. The two most frequently used media for isolating Fusarium species are those of Nash and Snyder (1962) and Komada (1975), or modifications of these. The following are the ingredients and procedures for making Nash and Snyder's (1962) Seifert (http://res.agr.ca/brd/fusarium/) gives the recipes for two other Fusarium isolation media, i.e. dichloran chloramphenicol peptone agar and peptone PCNB agar. Both are from Burgess et al. (1988) and differ slightly from the above recipes. Singh et al. (1991) have also formulated a recipe for a Fusarium selective medium [see section 5.5.10]. † Note: fungicides in the selective media are given as a.i. (active ingredient, i.e. the amount of active fungicide in the formulated product). For example, a fungicide listed as 80 WP contains 80% active ingredient in a wettable powder formulation; thus 2 g of commercial product would have to be added to obtain 1.6 g of active ingredient.A 100 mm diameter Petri dish accommodates about 20 medium-sized seeds, e.g. of most conifers, and since these selective media inhibit the growth of many contaminants the seeds can be added to the dishes without following strict aseptic conditions. Incubate the plates at 24 -26°C for 7-10 days (James et al. 1991) under cool, fluorescent light to induce Fusarium sporulation (Komada 1975) which is required for identification.Based on cultural and spore characteristics, hosts, etc., there are several taxonomic keys for identifying Fusarium species, e.g. for those with access to the Internet Seifert's FUSKEY--Fusarium Interactive Key (http://res.agr.ca/brd/fusarium/) is available in English and French. Gerlach and Nirenberg (1982) give other keys. Singh et al. (1991) give cultural and spore characteristics, and coloured illustrations of colonies, for many species of Fusarium from cereal and other seeds, several of which could occur on tree seeds.The fungi of concern here are Sirococcus conigenus, the Sirococcus blight pathogen, and S. clavigignenti-juglandacearum, which causes Sirococcus canker of butternut. S. conigenus (syn. S. strobilinus and S. piniperda) affects several species of conifer, notably Pinus spp. (Fig. 13), Picea spp. and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). S. clavigignenti-juglandacearum affects butternut (Juglans cinerea) trees in nature and, via artificial inoculation, other Juglans species (Sinclair et al. 1993). No sexual state is known for either fungus (Deuteromycotina, Coelomycetes) and both fungi are seed-borne, i.e. S. conigenus on conifer seeds (Sutherland et al. 1987) and S. clavigignenti-juglandacearum on butternut (Orchard, 1984;Prey et al. 1997). Orchard (1984) demonstrated the seed-borne nature of butternut canker by isolating the pathogen from necrotic tissue near the point of seed attachment of up to 13% of seedlings of infested, butternut seedlots. S. conigenus often fruits on germinants (Fig. 9), thus it may also be detected during routine seed testing or by blotter plate testing. However, such tests are less reliable than the one described here since S. conigenus, which is often within seeds, is easily overgrown by contaminants.The following procedures are recommended for detecting S. conigenus on conifer seeds and S. clavigignenti-juglandacearum on butternut (Juglans cinerea) seeds. Surface-sterilize seeds with 30% H 2 O 2 for 30 min at room temperature and then plate them, 20-25 per Petri dish, directly onto 2% water agar If H 2 O 2 is unavailable, surface-sterilize the seeds with 0.5% NaOCl for 5 min, rinse them twice with sterile, distilled water then plate them onto water agar. Incubate the seeds at 20 to 25°C and every 2-3 days, for up to 2 weeks, use a stereomicroscope to check for Sirococcus growing from the seeds or sporulating (Fig. 14) on the germinants. Since incidence of the fungus within infested seedlots is seldom above 3%, test 500-1000 seeds/seedlot to detect the fungus. S. conigenus can also be detected in seedlots using a monoclonal antibody protocol (see our discussion on molecular techniques). Sutherland et al. (1987) give the characteristics of S. conigenus spores and cultures. Isolations were made by surface-sterilizing diseased tissue in 0.5% NaOCl (time not specified) followed by plating onto PDA. S. clavigignenti-juglandacearum was also isolated from aqueous solutions of butternut meats of many of the same seedlots for which seed-borne inoculum of the fungus had been found. Nair et al. (1979) and Sinclair et al. (1993) give the spore and fruiting body characteristics for identifying this pathogen.Caloscypha fulgens (Ascomycotina, Pezizales; anamorph Geniculodendron pyriforme) is seed-borne and attacks seeds before they germinate in nurseries and forests. The fungus gets its common names because it is seed-borne and it can grow at fairly low temperatures. Seeds are not susceptible to infection once germination begins. Affected seeds are mummified rather than rotted, thus seed lots suspected of being infested should be assayed. Seed lots that germinate poorly following stratification (when the fungus spreads) are prime candidates for assay.The following procedure is recommended for isolating Caloscypha fulgens from conifer seeds, especially of species of Picea and Pinus. Surface-sterilize seed samples for 30 min in 30% H 2 O 2 , then plate them 20 -25 per 90 or 100 mm Petri dish onto 1.5 -2% water agar. Incubate the plates at 15 -20°C in either the dark or under no more than 12 h of fluorescent lighting per day. After 10 -14 days incubation use a stereomicroscope to look for the distinctive indigo or orange fungus colonies growing from diseased seeds (Fig. 15). Individual hyphae are thick, verrucose and often branch at right-angles (Fig. 16), reminiscent of Rhizoctonia spp. The characteristics of the cultures, the asexual spores and the orange ascocarps of the fungus, which are produced on the forest floor soon after spring snow melt, are given by Sutherland et al. (1987).Whereas species of Phytophthora and Pythium (Peronosporales) are rather common on broadleaf tree seeds, they are rare on conifer seeds (Mittal et al.1990). Perhaps this is because conifer cones are woody and dry at harvest and unsuitable for these fungi, while hardwood fruits that are often succulent or fleshy, or both, are better substrates for Phytophthora and Pythium species. Infection occurs when fruits contact infested soil, usually in the forest before collection for seed extraction. Phytophthora and Pythium can be isolated directly from surface-sterilized fruits or seeds, however, since contaminants sometimes overgrow them or inhibit their growth it is best to isolate them using baits or selective media. A baiting method for isolating Phytophthora and Pythium from soil or plant material, should work well for seeds, is the apple technique (Campbell 1949).Use a cork borer to remove a core of tissue from a ripe apple and place the test seeds or other plant tissues into the hole. If the seeds or other test samples are dry then moisten them with sterile, distilled water. Seal the opening of hole with masking tape and incubate the apple at room temperature. When the apple begins to rot around the inoculation core, surface-sterilize it with ethyl alcohol or weak bleach (ca. 5%), remove the skin over the rot, then aseptically remove small segments of apple tissue just ahead of the margin between the rotted and firm tissue. Plate this tissue onto a medium (e.g. PDA) for isolation of Phytophthora or Pythium spp., or preferably onto one of the selective media given below. Other fruits, including pears, can also be used (Fig. 17).Fig. 17. Pear baits can be used to isolate Phytophthora or Pythium from water, soil or seeds. Pear tissue, taken from the margin of the lesions, is plated onto the Phytophthora-selective medium in the Petri dish. (Dr J. Sutherland, Victoria, BC, Canada) Hamm and Hansen (1991) give the recipes for several media for isolating and identifying species of Phytophthora and Pythium spp. The ingredients and procedures for making two of these follow: then autoclave the ingredients for 15 min. Allow the medium to cool to 45°C, then add 250 mg of ampicillin and 10 mg of rifamycin. Prepare new stock solutions for each batch of medium using sterile water for ampicillin and 50% ethanol for rifamycin (store both at 5°C). Hamm and Hansen (1991) also give the recipes for several media to induce sporulation in Pythium and Phytophthora, plus a taxonomic key for identifying Phytophthora spp. important as forest pathogens. Stamps et al. (1990) present a detailed tabular key to Phytophthora species and Van Der Plaats-Niterink (1981) gives a taxonomic key for Pythium species.Fungi in the genus Rhizoctonia are well known, ubiquitous pathogens, causing innumerable diseases on a wide variety of host plants including damping-off and root rots in forest nurseries. R. solani is among the most widespread and prevalent species. It is the mycelial, sclerotia-forming state of the fungus Thanatephorus cucumeris (Tulasnellales, Ceratobasidiaceae). R. solani typifies these fungi that ordinarily produce no spores, have pale to dark brown mycelium, and large-diameter hyphae which branch frequently at right angles. R. solani produces black sclerotia, both in nature and in culture, varying in size from spheres less than 1 mm across to crusts several millimetres in diameter (Sinclair et al. 1993). Mittal et al. (1990) cite 10 incidences of Rhizoctonia on tree seeds, i.e. three for Rhizoctonia. sp. and seven for R. solani. The records for Rhizoctonia sp. are on Cedrus deodora in India, Cupressus sempervirens in Egypt and Pinus elliottii in Taiwan. R. solani is reported from a variety of conifer and broadleaf species † Also sold as Devoced (Gist-Brocades, King of Persia, Pennsylvania), available as a 50% wettable powder, store the powder in a refrigerated, amber-coloured bottle out of direct light. Always prepare fresh solutions before using.as for example Abies spp. in the USA, Pinus nigra in Italy, Fagus sylvatica in France and Araucaria cunninghamii in Australia.Usually Rhizoctonia species are easily isolated by plating surfacesterilized seeds or tissues onto culture media such as PDA or in the blotter test. However, it is also possible to use baits and selective media for isolation. Chandelier (1994) gives a baiting technique for isolating R. solani from soil, which also seems appropriate for isolating the fungus from seeds, although it may be too laborious. The technique consists of soaking 10 mm diameter, filter paper disks in a liquid culture medium, allowing the fungus to colonize the disks, then isolating it from the disks. The ingredients and procedures for making this medium are:Galactose Dispense the medium to Petri dishes, add the disks, incubate at 25°C and after 2-4 days examine the plates for Rhizoctonia using a stereomicroscope. Ko and Hora (1971) were among the first to develop a selective media for isolating R. solani. Later Gangopadhyay and Grover (1985) improved the efficacy of this medium and although it was developed for isolating R. solani from soil it should suffice for isolating this Rhizoctonia, and others, from seeds and fruits.The ingredients and procedures for making this medium are: We recommend that surface disinfected seeds, or portions of fruits, be plated directly onto this medium in Petri dishes. Incubate and examine the plates using a stereomicroscope. Sneh et al. (1991) give several other isolation techniques and selective media for isolating various Rhizoctonia species, mainly from soil. Chandelier (1994) outlines identification methods for Rhizoctonia species and Sneh et al. (1991) provide techniques and taxonomic keys for identifying Rhizoctonia.Species of Cylindrocladium (Deuteromycotina, Hyphomycetes) cause damping-off, root rots and foliage blight of many species of broadleaf and conifer seedlings. Unidentified species of Cylindrocladium have been reported as being seed-borne for Shorea assamica in Malaysia and Pinus lambertiana in the USA (Mittal et al. 1990) whereas C. clavatum has been reported on seeds of Eucalyptus tereticornis in India (Mohanan and Sharma 1991). Ivory (1987) andDomsch et al. (1980) illustrated the distinctive conidiophores and spores of Cylindrocladium. These spores suggest that it may be possible to identify infested seed lots using the seed washing technique described earlier.The fungus is fairly easily isolated by plating surface-sterilized seed or host tissue on to standard culture media such as PDA. (Phipps, pers. comm.) recommends home-made PDA amended with 100 ppm (100 mg l -1 ) each of chloramphenicol and chlortetracycline for isolating Cylindrocladium from plant tissues. The latter two components should be added only after the medium has been autoclaved and allowed to cool to 50°C. The Plant Pathologist's Pocketbook (Anonymous 1968) and Hawksworth et al. (1995) give procedures for making PDA. Griffin (1977) gives a selective medium for isolating C. crotalariae from soil which should also work for other species of Cylindrocladium on tree seeds.The ingredients and procedures for making this medium called Sucrose-QT medium (Domsch et al. 1980;Ivory 1987). Peerally (1991), Schubert et al. (1989) and most recently Crous and Wingfield (1994) give taxonomic keys for identifying species of Cylindrocladium. Crous et al. (1992) also describe how cultural conditions affect vesicle and conidiospore morphology of species of Cylindrocladium and the closely related genus Cylindrocladiella.Species of Botryosphaeria (Pleosporales, Botryosphaeriaceae) have conidial states in six form genera, including Lasiodiplodia and Sphaeropsis (Sinclair et al. 1993). Lasiodiplodia theobromae (=Diplodia gossypina) and Sphaeropsis sapinea (=Diplodia pinea) are two closely related pathogens that cause severe losses of pine seeds in a variety of widely geographically separated areas. For example, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, a widespread, unspecialized rot pathogen with a wide host range, causes seed rot in slash pine seeds (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) in the southeastern USA (e.g. Fraedrich 1996) and rotting of cones and seeds of this species in South Africa (Cilliers et al. 1995) and seed rot of P. caribaea and P. oocarpa seeds in Central America (Rees 1988;Rees and Webber 1988). Sphaeropsis sapinea, besides causing seed rot in slash pine seeds (Fraedrich 1996), is a foliage pathogen of numerous pine species in over 25 countries in both hemispheres (Swart and Wingfield 1991). Undoubtedly it attacks seeds of many of these pines. Cilliers et al. (1995) Incubate the Petri plates at 25°C for 4 days under nearultraviolet (black) light to induce sporulation of L. theobromae. Swart et al. (1987) give a selective medium for isolating S. sapinea from Pinus radiata needle and stem tissue which is also effective for isolating the fungus from seeds. We suggest that seeds be surface-sterilized, e.g. as for isolating L. theobromae, before they are plated onto the following medium: Fungi in the genus Colletotrichum, such as C. gloeosporioides (conidial state of Glomerella cingulata, Phyllachorales, Melogrammataceae) often occur on seeds of trees (Fig. 18) and woody shrubs. For example, a Colletotrichum sp. was isolated from Eucalyptus citriodora seeds in India (Mohanan and Sharma 1991) and C. gloeosporioides from seeds of the woody shrub Lupinus arboreus in New Zealand (Dick 1994). C. dematium has been found on seeds of Dipterocarpus alatus; C. gloeosporioides on seeds of Dalbergia cochinchinensis, D. cultrata and Pterocarpus macrocarpus; and another Colletotrichium species on D. alatus and Shorea siamensis seeds in Thailand (Pongpanich 1990). Mittal et al. (1990) report these and other species of Colletotrichum on seeds of seven tropical tree species in Malaysia, the Philippines and India plus Acer palmatum in South Korea.Species of Colletotrichum are ordinarily isolated from surfacesterilized tissues plated onto media such as PDA. However, if seeds or fruits contain an inordinate amount of debris or soilinhabiting microbes, other techniques may prove useful. For example, Russo et al. (1983) isolated C. gloeosporioides from Indian coral tree (Erythrina variegata var. orientalis) leaf tissues washed in warm, soapy water, rinsed in deionized, distilled water, plated onto PDA (Difco) and incubated at 22-24°C in the dark. Eastburn and Gubler (1992), studying C. acutatum survival in soil, isolated the fungus from strawberry (Fragaria spp.) petiole pieces by washing them in running tap water for 10-15 min, followed by a 30 s soak in 0.5% NaOCl and then a rinse in sterile, distilled water. The pieces were then plated onto acidified PDA or PDA containing benomyl (5 mg a.i. l -1 ), streptomycin and tetracycline (each at 30 mg l -1 ) followed by incubation at 24°C for 3 -4 days. Sutton (1992) gives the cultural and spore characteristics and many hosts for 39 species of Colletotrichum, including C. gloeosporioides and C. acutatum and C. acutatum f. sp. pinea which are among the most common species found on tree seeds and fruits.Trichoderma species (Deuteromycotina, Hypocreaceae) are among the most common fungi occurring on seeds and fruits. It is rare to find seedlots in which some seeds do not harbour these fungi. They are so common that sometimes they may not be recorded, but disregarded as contaminants. Mittal et al. (1990) give 30 records of Trichoderma species on seeds of various hardwoods and conifers around the world. The role of Trichoderma spp. on seeds is not well understood, as these species may be beneficial antagonists to plant-pathogenic fungi, or they may indicate poor quality seeds. Conversely, some high-quality Douglas-fir seedlots may harbour large populations of Trichoderma spp. (Bloomberg 1996). Sometimes, as with Abies spp. seeds (Edwards and Sutherland 1979), removing Trichoderma with surface sterilants does not improve seed germination.The ingredients and procedures to make the Trichoderma selective medium of Papavizas and Lumsden (1982) Thoroughly mix these ingredients into the medium, e.g. using a magnetic stirrer, then disperse the medium into Petri dishes. Plate seeds or fruits, or parts thereof, on to this medium and incubate at 20 -25°C, preferably using ambient lighting to stimulate Trichoderma sporulation. Check the plates 2-4 days later for Trichoderma growth which at least for the common T. viride is characteristically green-blue (Fig. 19). There are several taxonomic keys to certain species of Trichoderma, e.g. Domsch et al. (1980) give detailed descriptions and a key to six soil-borne species while Bissett (1984) and Rifai (1969) describe and give keys for six and nine species, respectively.The genus Botrytis (Deuteromycotina, Hyphomycetes), anamorph of the genus Botryotinia, contains some of the most ubiquitous fungi in the world. They are both pathogenic and saprophytic on a wide variety of plant material and tissues. Grey mould, caused by B. cinerea, is one of the most damaging forest nursery diseases. Mittal et al. (1990) recorded this fungus on the seeds of 15 tree species in at least a dozen countries, e.g. seeds of Acer spp. in South Korea, A. saccharum and Betula papyrifera in the USA, Eucalyptus spp. and Cassia fistula in India, Larix decidua in the former USSR, Pinus caribaea in Cuba and Quercus spp. in the former Czechoslovakia. Yuan et al. (1990) showed that B. cinerea, isolated from tree seeds, significantly reduces emergence of Acacia auriculiformis and Casuarina cunninghamiana, but not Eucalyptus camaldulensis seeds.Botrytis spp. are readily isolated from surface-sterilized tissue plated onto PDA and other culture media. Another diagnostic tool is to incubate non-sterilized seeds or tissues in a humidity chamber at room temperature where Botrytis quickly fruits on affected tissues. Botrytis spp. are easily detected during routine seed germination testing (e.g. Prochazkova and Jancarek 1990) and the blotter technique, both of which we describe earlier. Since all Botrytis species form sclerotia (Jarvis 1977) these could be detected by examining seed washings (described earlier). Botrytis spp. are readily isolated from seeds and other plant materials, and usually sporulate readily (Fig. 20), so there has not been much need for selective media for their isolation. As Jarvis (1977) points out those selective media which have been developed have been for distinguishing various species of Botrytis (e.g. Netzer and Dishon 1967), rather than for isolating Botrytis species. However, Kerssies (1990) Adjust the pH of the medium to 4.5 with 5.0 N NaOH before dispensing it to Petri dishes. Plate either surface-sterilized or unsterilized seeds, or fruits or pieces of cones, onto the medium and incubate at room temperature. Most Botrytis species grow fast, thus regardless of the isolation technique used, observe the cultures daily for up to 7 days. To induce sporulation Jarvis (1977) recommends growing cultures of Botrytis spp. at 21°C in Pyrex glass containers and exposing them to near-ultraviolet light (wavelength 320 -380 nm). The characteristic conidiophores and spores are easily distinguishable, and often dark sclerotia form in culture. Hennebert (1973) gives a taxonomic key to species of Botrytis and Botrytis-like genera and Jarvis (1977) lists some 22 Botrytis species, plus another three possibly valid species.Fungi such as those in the genera Penicillium and Aspergillus are ubiquitous on tree seeds, fruits and cones. For example, Mittal et al. (1990) list almost 200 records of Aspergillus species on numerous species of tree seeds. While such fungi are sometimes weakly pathogenic (e.g. Mittal and Wang 1986;1987) their presence often indicates that the seeds have been previously weakened by factors such as harsh handling or improper extraction procedures, or that the seeds are immature (Bloomberg 1966). Furthermore, the presence of xerotolerant species of both Aspergillus and Penicillium can have devastating effects on the vigour and viability of seeds that are stored under RH conditions that permit their proliferation. Such conditions are common in the tropics and sub-tropics.Usually Penicillium and similar fungi are isolated without difficulty by surface-sterilizing and plating seeds onto PDA or malt extract agar media. These fungi may also be detected using either the routine seed germination assay or the blotter paper technique described earlier. Since they seldom grow well on media which are selective for other fungi they can sometimes be detected by plating seeds onto such media where their growth is confined to the seeds. Singh et al. (1991) give the recipe for a medium (DG-18) for isolating species of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium plus recipes for purifying isolates of these fungi. The ingredients and procedures for making the DG-18 medium are:Glucose ingredients in the water, then add the glycerol just before autoclaving. Plate the surface-sterilized seeds onto the medium in Petri plates and incubate at 25°C for 7 days under 12-h, alternating cycles of near ultraviolet (NUV) light and darkness to induce fungus sporulation. For NUV use black light tubes, e.g. Philips TLD 36 W/08, suspended about 40 cm above the seeds (20 cm between the tubes). If these tubes are not available, use cool, white florescent light tubes, such as Philips TLD 36 W/84, which emit some NUV light. Examine the fungi using either a stereo-or compound microscope. Singh et al. (1991) give the cultural and spore characteristics for many species of Penicillium, Aspergillus and Fusarium. Domsch et al. (1980) give taxonomic keys for numerous species of Penicillium and Aspergillus.Molecular biological and biochemical approaches to the detection, identification and quantification of micro-organisms in situ carry certain advantages over, and are complementary to, traditional culture-based methods of analysis. In addition to helping avoid laborious and time-consuming aspects of laboratory culture, such methods circumvent the inherent bias in favour of organisms that are most amiable to culture on commonly used laboratory media. In fact, it has long been recognized that some important groups of micro-organisms may be completely resistant to laboratory culture (Skinner et al. 1952). The following is necessarily brief and is intended as a starting-point for the interested reader.Culture-independent methods target microbial nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), protein or lipid molecules that can be distinguished from that of the host (in this case, plant), and such informative molecules are collectively referred to as biomarkers (White et al. 1999). Methods for detection and quantification of these biomarkers generally arrive in fields such as plant pathology and microbial ecology as a function of 'trickle-down' from clinical biology. Therefore, despite their growing popularity throughout the biological sciences, it is the medical literature that must be surveyed in order to appreciate fully the potential impact that these approaches hold in monitoring microbial populations growing on non-orthodox seeds or embryonic axes during, and prior to, storage.The most recent non-clinical review addressing the molecular detection of fungi was provided by Kowalchuk (1999). Microbial DNA and RNA are usually detected by use methods based upon the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is used to amplify nucleic acid fragments specific to the desired taxonomic level, which may range from microbial strain to one of the three domains of life, or target groups of viruses. In studies related to microbial infection of plant material, such methods must be able to discriminate between the target populations and the host genetic material. Furthermore, the genetic marker chosen must contain the necessary information to identify the microbial population(s) of interest. Amplification products may be subjected to a number of secondary analyses, designed to glean information on the presence and identity of target populations. Primary purposes are detection of a specific microbial species or strains (presence/absence and † Contributed by John R. Stephen and Bill Finch-Savage, Crop and Weed Science Dept, Horticultural Research International, UK and George A. Kowalchuk, Dept Plant-Micro-organism Interactions, Netherlands Institute for Ecology, Netherlands. quantification), taxonomic profiling of the target community to determine diversity and associations, and comparison of samples to detect effects of, and recovery from, perturbation. Often, a given approach provides information on more than one of the above.The simplest application of PCR-technology is in the detection of the presence of a particular pathogen or taxonomically related group of pathogenic species. For these purposes, all that is required is a method for extracting nucleic acids from seed tissue (numerous proprietary kits are marketed by Ambion, Biorad, Hybaid, Quaigen and others), suitable primers and reagents, and a thermocycling block. However, in this form the information recovered is not quantitative, the recovery of a PCR product warns of the presence of a pathogen, but does not indicate the severity of the infection (Henson and French 1993;Elliot et al. 1993;Schubert et al. 1999). Several methods exist to generate quantitative information from the PCR, which include spiking the reaction with a known amount of an internal standard (which may be a modified version of the target sequence; e.g. Nicholson et al. 1998), extinction-dilution of the template (Chandler 1998), and 'real-time' PCR, requiring expensive and specialized equipment (Loeffler et al. 2000).The above methods can provide results in less than a single working day, and have considerable application in determining seed quality prior to storage. Further information on the identity of contaminant species may be derived by hybridising the PCR amplification product to taxonomically informative probes (Posteraro et al. 2000), or by generating a profile of the target population by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE, Muyzer et al. 1993;Kowalchuk et al. 1997) or ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA; García-Martínez et al. 1999). Both methods may be used to monitor microbial biocontrol agents (e.g. Stephen et al. 1999), and the former of these, DGGE (and its relatives, TTGE and TGGE) can be made to hold a quantitative aspect by use of real-time PCR or internal standards (Felske et al. 1998;Brüggemann et al. 2000). These methods target any user-definable taxonomic group, from kingdom to species, and are usually used to discover novel organisms that are resistant to laboratory cultivation: such organisms are often of more environmental relevance than their cultivated relatives (Watanabe and Baker 2000).For simplicity, the methods described above have assumed that the user is targeting microbial DNA: however, this may not always be useful. For example, if the investigator wished to use a molecular approach to test the efficacy of an antifungal treatment, PCR methods targeting DNA may be quite ineffectual, as DNA can be rather a stable molecule which may persist outside the cell or in dead cells for considerable lengths of time. RNA, and in particular mRNA, is a much more labile molecule, as is rapidly degraded by cellular ribonucleases following cell death. Intact RNA, free of DNA, can be readily purified from plant material (using proprietary kits, as above), and the target sequences converted to DNA prior to PCR amplification (termed reverse-transcription PCR, RT-PCR). Using such an approach, only viable, metabolically active fungi and bacteria are detected (e.g. Okeke et al. 2000).In addition to nucleic acid markers, biochemical markers such as phospholipid ester-linked fatty acids (PFLAs), neutral lipid fatty acid (NFLAs), and ergosterol (Ollson et al. 1998), may be useful for tracking some microbial groups. Such techniques avoid biases that may be introduced by the amplification of nucleic acid biomarkers, but they usually offer only a coarse level of resolution.Given the rapid advance in the variety and validity of molecular biological approaches for the detection and characterization of microbial populations, it is likely that these methods will help improve the selection of the highest quality non-orthodox seed material for cryopreservation and monitoring contamination of seed during prolonged storage.9 The nature of viruses on forest tree seeds § Viruses can be widely disseminated in tree seeds. Thus, they threaten not only those hosts on which they are seed-borne, but, via secondary spread, other hosts as well. Viruses can be carried either on the seedcoat (and mechanically infect germinants during seed germination) or within the seed embryo as the result of infection via the ovary or from pollen of infected mother plants. Transmission occurs either by way of the sperm cell nucleus or cytoplasm, or from virus particles on pollen. All pollen-transmitted viruses are also seed-borne. The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses recognizes 32 groups of well-characterized viruses, 12 of which commonly occur in trees and shrubs (Cooper et al. 1986). Nepoviruses, ilarviruses and cucumoviruses are transmitted via tree seeds or pollen. Holliday (1990) gives sizes, physical and chemical characteristics and related information on these groups of viruses Nepoviruses, common in trees and shrubs, are transmitted by seed and pollen, or by nematodes or other means. Cherry leaf roll virus (CLRV), for example, is prevalent in species of Betula and Cornus, and also in Fagus sylvatica, Fraxinus excelsior, Juglans regia, Rhamnus cathartica and Sambucus nigra, where symptoms include chlorotic ringspots on leaves, leaf dwarfing and eventually tree decline. Another nepovirus, Arabis mosaic virus, occurs in ash (Fraxinus spp.). Ilarviruses tend to be host specific; they are widespread and cause serious losses in fruit trees. Elm mottle virus affects Syringa vulgaris and Ulmus glabra, whereas Apple mosaic virus occurs in Rosa spp. and Corylus avellana, and Prunus necrotic ringspot virus is found in Aesculus hippocastanum. Cucumber mosaic virus, a cucumovirus, has been detected in Lonicera periclymenum and Ligastrum species. Tobamoviruses occur on seed coats and infect germinants, e.g. of Quercus robur and Acer spp. during seed germination. However, they are not internally seed-borne (Büttner and Führling 1996;1997).Three different techniques are presented here for detecting viruses in hardwood seeds or young plants, the seeds of which are suspected of harbouring viruses. Because of the irregular distribution and relatively low concentration of viruses in seed lots, these protocols are more reliable than techniques such as transmission electron microscopy to examine seed or plant extracts for viruses. However, serological techniques, such as ELISA, may § Prepared by Drs C. Büttner and M. Führling, Institute of Forest Botany and Tree Physiology, University of Freiburg, D-79085 Freiburg Br., Am Flughafen 17, Germany.suffer from problems, for instance the presence of phenolic compounds in seeds and other tissues. Our protocols can be used for either seeds or leaf tissue of germinants. In the case of seeds, the seed coat may be removed when preparing samples for assay.The first technique is the double antibody sandwich ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay), which is recommended for detecting ilarviruses and cucumoviruses. Cooper et al. (1986) used this extremely sensitive immunological technique to detect ilarviruses in cherry (Prunus avium) seed, and to survey poplar germplasm for Poplar mosaic virus. There are no reports on ELISA being used to detect cucumoviruses in forest tree seeds, but studies on herb and other seeds confirm its reliability.The second technique is the immunocapture-reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (IC-RT-PCR), which is used for detecting the CLRV nepovirus. Our experience suggests that CLRV is one of the most common seed-and pollen-transmitted viruses affecting hardwood trees and shrubs. Recently Büttner et al. (1996) used grafting to transmit the pathogen to host plants, and a modified polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, and the hybridization technique to detect CLRV. The PCR and hybridization techniques detect small amounts of viruses. Werner et al. (1997) evaluated a method for detecting CLRV in seeds of birch and concluded that PCR followed by immunocapture-reverse transcriptase is the most sensitive method for detecting viral RNAs. Cooper (1993) showed that the seed transmission rate of CLRV is very variable and depends on whether male or female gametophytes originated from a CLRV infected tree. The rate of vertical spread of viruses within the host depends on various factors such as virus strain and environmental conditions (Maule and Wang 1996).The third technique is the dot blot hybridization, which is used for detecting tobamoviruses in oaks and maples. It can be used to detect specific plant RNA viruses or viroids when a specific probe is available. This probe must be produced by molecular biological methods. In comparison to IC-RT-PCR, it is not absolutely necessary to have information concerning the genome sequence to construct a probe. The dot blot hybridization technique is particularly useful for routine testing of many samples. PCR, which is more specific than the hybridization technique, is useful for differentiating virus strains, but this as well as the equipment and chemicals are expensive and so this technique is not recommended for routine virus diagnosis.10 Protocols for detecting viruses 10.1 Double antibody sandwich, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA)As given by Clark and Adams (1977) and van Regenmortel (1982). Note: If bacterial contamination is prevalent, add 0.02% sodium azide to all buffers.Recommended for detecting ilarviruses and cucumoviruses.Prepare the globulins by precipitation from the antiserum with an equal volume of 4 M ammonium sulphate. Slowly stir the solution for an h at room temperature, then centrifuge it at 8000 rpm for 10 min. Re-dissolve the pellet in 1 ml of half concentration, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, then remove the ammonium sulphate by dialysis using half concentration PBS.Antibodies are diluted in coating buffer, usually 1:1000 (but the appropriate dilution should be determined when initiating the procedure, as the rate depends on the quality of the antibodies). Use 200 µl/well for coating by passive adsorption, incubate at 37°C for 4 h, wash three times with PBS-T, i.e. PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, with 3 min intervals between washes.Extract the viral antigens in seeds or leaf material by using 1:10-1:30 in PBS-T. Then transfer 200 µl of the sample into the wells, incubate overnight at 4°C, then wash three times with PBS-T, using 3 min intervals between washes. To reduce non-specific reactions and increase the sensitivity of virus, add 1-2% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 1 M urea and reducing agents to the buffer (Guggerli,1979).Block with 200 µl 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) per well and incubate for 2 h at room temperature. Then wash three times with PBS-T with 3 min between washes.Dilute (usually 1:500-1:1000, but determine dilution empirically) antivirus enzyme conjugate in PBS-T. Next transfer 200 µl/well and incubate at 37°C for 4 h, then wash three times with PBS-T, using 3 min intervals between washes. The most common enzyme conjugate is prepared with alkaline phosphatase (Boehringer, Mannheim or Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) by coupling the globulins with enzyme at 1 ml : 0.1 ml (v/v globulin : enzyme) using 0.06% glutaraldehyde. Store the conjugate at 4°C in the presence of 1% bovine serum albumin.Dilute, just before using, the substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate (1 mg ml -1 ) in 0.1 M diethanolamine buffer, pH 9.8. Transfer 250 µl into each well. Score the results visually by intensity of the yellow colour, or by either reading the absorbance at 405 nm using a spectrophotometer, or an ELISA-reader. Add 50 µl of 3 M NaOH to each well to stop the reaction, when the background color of the blank/healthy controls begin to darken, or after the positive colorimetric reactions are recorded. The results are positive if the absorbance is twice that for healthy material (controls), or two standard deviations higher than the mean of a negative control curve.See Büttner et al. (1996) and Werner et al. (1997).Recommended for detecting the nepovirus CLRV.Grind the plant tissue under liquid nitrogen, then homogenize the powder in 1:10 (w/v) buffer (PBS -Tween, 2% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone 40 (PVP 40). Centrifuge plant sap for 10 min at 3000g.Coat sterile, 0.5 ml, reaction tubes (Eppendorf Safelock) with 50 µl purified CLRV specific antibodies (40 µg/ml in 50 mM carbonate buffer, pH 9.6). Then incubate for 3 h at 37°C. Next wash the tubes three times for 3 min with 150 µl PBS -Tween (20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 135 mM NaCl, 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20). Incubate the coated tubes with 50 µl of the plant extracts (see sample preparation) overnight at 4°C. Afterwards wash three times for 3 min each with 150 µl PBS-Tween, then centrifuge the tubes briefly and remove the remaining wash buffer.Then add buffer and the specified components to a total volume of 20 µl: 50 mM Tris -HCl, pH 8.3, containing 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl 2 , 10 mM DTT, 1 mM dNTPs , 20 U ribonuclease inhibitor (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), 200 U M-MLV reverse transcriptase (GIBCO BRL, Inchinnan), 100 pmol CLRV specific first strand primer (5´-GTC GGA AAG ATT ACG TAA AAG G-3´). Incubate the captured virions for 1 h at 37°C, denature at 95°C for 3 min, then amplify aliquots of 2 µl of the reverse transcription reaction in a subsequent PCR.Mix 2 µl of the reverse transcription reaction, 20 pmol first strand primer, 20 pmol second strand primer and 2.5 U Taq-DNApolymerase. Then add 100 ml buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, containing 1.5 mM MgCl 2 and 50 mM KCl). Next, amplify the viral cDNA in a thermocycler at 35 cycles, anneal the primer at 51°C for 60 s, elongate the chain at 72°C for a 60 s, then denature at 95°C for 30 s.Melt 2 g agarose in 100 ml 1 × TBE-buffer (10 × TBE: 0.9 M Tris, 0.9 M boric acid, 50 mM EDTA), cool to it to about 60°C, then add 1 mg of ethidium bromide/ml of solution). Now transfer the agarose into a electrophoresis chamber (e.g. Biometra midi-gel), then prepare samples (aliquots of the PCR products) by adding 1:1 loading buffer (8 ml of 87% glycerol, 4 ml 10 (TBE, 28 ml distilled water, 0.01% bromephenol blue, 0.01% xylencyanol). Lastly, do the electrophoretic separation at 70 mA and observe the nucleic acid bands under UV-light. (Miltenburg et al. 1995). Use sterile Eppendorf tubes and DEPCtreated distilled water to make the buffers.Recommended for detecting tobamoviruses.Grind 200 mg plant tissue in a mortar with liquid nitrogen, to a fine homogenous powder, transfer it to a sterile Eppendorf tube, then add 800 µl denaturation buffer (4 M guanidinium isothiocyanate, 0.2 M mercaptoethanol) and vortex the mixture. Next, centrifuge it at 12000 rpm for 5 min, transfer 500 µl of supernatant to a fresh tube.For the chloroform-phenol extraction add 250 µl phenol and 250 µl chloroform/isoamylalcohol (24:1 v/v). Then vortex the mixture, centrifuge it at 12000 rpm for 3 min, repeat the chloroform/phenol extraction twice. Next transfer the combined supernatants to a fresh tube, add 500 µl chloroform, centrifuge at 12000 rpm for 3 min, vacuum off the aqueous phase and transfer to a fresh tube. Ethanol precipitation may be used for leaf or soft woody tissues by adding 50 µl 4 M LiCl and 1.3 ml 96% ethanol before vortexing.When assaying seeds, Rosaceae leaf tissue or hard woody tissues, add 60 µl 6 M NaCl and 1.3 ml 99.6% ethanol, vortex, then store for either 1 h at -80°C, or overnight at -20°C, or for 1 min on ice. Then centrifuge at 10000 rpm for 30 min, remove and discard the supernatant, add 1 ml 70% ethanol and continue sample preparation or store at -80°C until needed.Centrifuge the tubes at 15000 rpm for 20 min, remove and discard the ethanol, add 500 µl 70% ethanol and vortex centrifuge at 15000 rpm for 10 min, remove and discard the ethanol, add 500 µl of 70% ethanol and vortex, centrifuge at 15000 rpm for 10 min, remove and discard the ethanol, then air dry the pellet or dry it by speed vacuuming it twice for 2 min each time.Re-dissolve the pellet in 200 µl formaldehyde, 6 M in 10 × SSC (1.5 M NaCl, 0.15 M trisodiumcitrate), incubate 15 min at 65°C, chill on ice, wet a positively charged nylon membrane with sterile water and incubate for 15 min in 20 × SSC, incubate blotting paper (Whatman 3mm) for 15 min in 20 × SSC. Next wash the sample wells of the blotting apparatus with 400 µl 20 × SSC, load RNA samples into the sample wells (determine the concentration) and incubate for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, pass the RNA samples through the membrane by applying suction, wash with 500 µl 20 × SSC and incubate the membrane for 1 h at 80°C, or UV-crosslink the membrane (2000 µJ × 10 3 ).Transfer the membrane, print side up, into a hybridization flask, add 10 ml hybridization buffer (5 × SSC, 0.1% N-lauroylsarcosin, 0.02% SDS, 50% formamide, 2% blocking reagent (Boehringer, Mannheim) and 125 µg/ml herring sperm DNA) and incubate it for 1 h at 68°C with continuous agitation. Then add 50 µl of hybridization probe (Büttner and Führling 1997), incubate overnight at 68°C, remove the hybridization buffer (which can be reused several times), wash the membrane three times (15 min each) in 30 ml of wash solution I (2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS) at 65°C, then wash the membrane twice for 5 min each in wash solution II (0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS) at room temperature.Equilibrate the membrane in buffer I (0.1 M maleic acid, 0. 15 M NaCl with 0.3% Tween 20, pH 7.5) then block the membrane by gently agitating it in buffer II (1% blocking reagent dissolved in buffer I) for 60 min. Next dilute Anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase 1:10000 (75 mU ml -1 ) in buffer II and mix gently by inversion (the solution is stable for several days at 4°C), incubate the membrane in the antibody solution for 30 min, shaking the tray gently to ensure the membrane is always covered. Afterward discard the antibody solution and wash the membrane twice for 15 min in buffer I, equilibrate the membrane in buffer III (0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 9.5; add 0.1 M NaCl, 0.05 M MgCl 2 ) for 2 min, dilute CSPD (Cold Shock Protein D) in buffer III (1:100), place the wet membrane between two sheets of plastic page protectors. Then lift the top sheet and add diluted CSPD (0.5 ml/100 cm 2 ), distribute the drops over the surface by rocking the membrane; create a closed liquid seal by wiping the top sheet to remove bubbles, then incubate the membrane for 5 min at room temperature. Next seal the semidry membrane in a plastic bag, incubate it for 15 min at 37°C, expose the membrane to Hyperfilm-ECL (Amersham) for 15 min, then develop the film and expose the membrane again as long as needed.Recommended for detecting pathogens with a long latent period between infection and appearance of disease symptoms. Growing-on tests are especially useful for detecting seed-borne pathogens, such as viruses, which may have a long incubation period before symptom development. Consequently, growing on tests are often used by plant quarantine officials to detect pathogens which might otherwise go undetected by short-term tests or assays of seeds. The duration of such tests varies with the phenology of the host plants and the suspected pathogens. For example, seed-borne Sirococcus conigenus on spruce seedlings would be expected to appear when the plants are 6 weeks to 6 months old, while some virus pathogens may not appear for two years or longer in the growing plants. A representative sample of the seeds being assayed is planted in a sterile growing medium, such as a mixture of peat and sand, or sterilized soil, and the resulting seedlings are grown in a greenhouse free of the suspected pathogen. Ideally seedlings would be kept in insectproof greenhouse to prevent insects from vectoring viruses or other pathogens. Nevertheless, the young plants may have to be sprayed with insecticides to prevent insect feeding. Plants are examined periodically for symptom development and pathogen confirmation. Orchard (1984) used a growing on test to show the seed-borne nature of the butternut canker pathogen Sirococcus clavigignentijuglandacearum. Butternuts were collected from diseased trees in the autumn and following storage at 4°C in plastic bags for 3 -27 months they were sown in flats in the greenhouse. When the seedlings were 2 weeks old they were transplanted into a sterile sand-soil-peat mixture in 13 cm diameter clay pots. Three weeks after transplanting the seedlings, the pathogen was isolated from necrotic stem tissue near the point of seed attachment. Koch's Postulates were fulfilled to confirm pathogenicity of the seedborne inoculum.Agar An ingredient used to solidify culture media. Anamorph Asexual stage. Autoclave A device for sterilizing culture media, water and other materials. Most micro-organisms are killed by autoclaving (sterilising) for 15 min at 121°C, but sometimes longer times are used. Bacterium (bacteria) Usually one-celled (0.25 -2.0 µm) microorganisms, lacking a cellular membrane, usually without chlorophyll; parasitic or saprophytic. Basidium (basidia) Specialized cell or organ on which basidiospores of Basidiomycotina (basidium-producing) fungi are produced. Blight A disease which develops quickly, usually, affecting young tissues of foliage, fruits and the like. Canker A definite, dead, dry, sunken or raised area on a stem, bole of a tree and other tissues, surrounded by living tissue. Chlorotic Tissue with reduced chlorophyll content. Conidiophore A specialized fungus structure, arising from the vegetative growth, upon which conidiospores are borne. Conidiospore An asexual spore of a fungus. Culture medium (media) A substrate upon which fungi and other micro-organisms are grown. Damping-off A disease attacking germinants before emergence or rotting them off afterward near the ground line. Fruiting body A specialized fungus structure in which spores are produced. Fungus (fungi) A single to many-celled organism (often microscopic), lacking chlorophyll, commonly producing hyphae (thread-like vegetative growth) that together constitute a mycelium, and reproducing by spores. Most plant diseases are caused by fungi. Haemocytometer A slide-like device for counting microorganisms or small particles using a microscope. Hypha (hyphae) The thread-like, vegetative growth of a fungus. Inoculum spores Vegetative growth or other structures of a micro-organism, that come into contact with plants and other organisms, or are introduced on/in a culture medium. Koch's postulates A set of protocols for proving pathogenicity of a micro-organism. Malt agar A culture medium for micro-organisms, especially fungi, in which malt extract, agar and water are the main ingredients.Mycelium A mass of hyphae. Pathogen (pathogenic) An organism, often a micro-organism, capable of causing disease. Bacteria, fungi, viruses, nematodes are examples of plant pathogens. PDA (potato dextrose agar) A medium commonly used for laboratory culture of fungi, the major ingredients of which are potato, dextrose (sucrose), agar and water. Root rot Decay of roots. Saprophyte An organism such a fungus or bacterium which lives on dead, organic material. Sclerotium A hard mass of fungus vegetative growth (hyphae) serving as a survival mechanism during unfavourable conditions. Seed-borne Pathogen or pest disseminated as a contaminant of seed. Seed-transmitted Pathogen or pest biologically and physiologically attached to the seed. Spore A reproductive body, one to several cells, of fungi, bacteria and certain lower plants. Viroid An infectious pathogen consisting of ribonucleic acid, smaller than a virus. Virus A submicroscopic, infectious nucleoprotein, often pathogenic, multiplies only in living cells. Water agar A culture medium containing only water and agar, usually 1.5-2%."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1385934593.json b/main/part_2/1385934593.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f48a51841573cf47c670763e067a989844a84925 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1385934593.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4b115566cd17b583603d0dcc3b7358ea","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ef907e25-b7d0-47ce-80c6-ff2cd156e5d4/content","id":"-475047806"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b7733dac-94e5-4f71-bc56-2f3a239cb426","content":"Why so important?• • Emerging Early Warning Systems• Spore dispersal / deposition models (close match to observed field data)• Quantified probability of spore migration pathways at regional scales "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1401195355.json b/main/part_2/1401195355.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5671a07102d1c2e40471018dff14fa03450597e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1401195355.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a8a4d3a0284a0cdfd1194d7d44058265","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/caa47770-7663-4f9c-ac98-6b87d7c9e79b/retrieve","id":"549028263"},"keywords":["Agricultural development","Burkina Faso","Mixed-methods research","Poultry value chains","Women's empowerment"],"sieverID":"5212a4e0-6b25-4496-8346-a695b0c25368","content":"in 1975, provides research-based policy solutions to sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition. IFPRI's strategic research aims to foster a climate-resilient and sustainable food supply; promote healthy diets and nutrition for all; build inclusive and efficient markets, trade systems, and food industries; transform agricultural and rural economies; and strengthen institutions and governance. Gender is integrated in all the Institute's work. Partnerships, communications, capacity strengthening, and data and knowledge management are essential components to translate IFPRI's research from action to impact. The Institute's regional and country programs play a critical role in responding to demand for food policy research and in delivering holistic support for country-led development. IFPRI collaborates with partners around the world.Women around the world are often heavily involved in the labor of agricultural production and homebased processing, but they are often less involved in agricultural markets due to a range of gender-based barriers (Malapit et al., 2020;Manzanera-Ruiz et al., 2016;Njuki et al., 2022). Gender-sensitive food systems interventions that focus on increasing women's participation in value chains and agricultural markets have the potential to empower women and improve gender equality. Under some conditions, increasing women's linkages with agricultural markets has the potential to increase their control over income and intrahousehold bargaining power (David, 2015;Rubin et al., 2009). However, such outcomes are not a given. Increased participation in food systems, through processing and marketing, may not necessarily lead to increased empowerment and may depend on the structure of the local economy, gender norms, or the type of commodity (A. Quisumbing, Heckert, et al., 2021). Poorer and more disempowered women, and those living in areas with especially restrictive gender norms, may experience more significant barriers entering markets, which raises the question of whether market-focused interventions can facilitate improved outcomes for these women and what types of programming are most conducive to women's empowerment in these circumstances.In this study, we draw on Kabeer's (1999) definition of empowerment as the process by which people expand their ability to make strategic life choices, particularly in contexts where this ability was previously denied to them. This definition encompasses three components: resources (access to and future claims on material human, and social resources), agency (decision-making and negotiation), and achievement (self-defined outcomes or goals). Increasingly, agricultural development interventions aim to increase women's involvement in agricultural markets and to increase their empowerment. There is a rapidly growing body of research that aims to identify the types of agricultural development interventionsand implementation strategies that successfully increase women's empowerment. Most of the evidence examining what works to empower women in agriculture focuses on interventions that target women's roles in production (A. Quisumbing et al., 2022). Meanwhile, there have been relatively few studies to date that look at the impacts of market-focused interventions on women's empowerment, and thus, no clear evidence on whether interventions that aim to increase women's roles in either processing or marketing can help foster women's empowerment; such evidence is important for strengthening gendersensitive food systems interventions (A. Quisumbing, Heckert, et al., 2021). It is important to understand the types of interventions that successfully foster women's empowerment, as well as which women are able to benefit from these interventions, so that the successes and failures of such programs can be used to improve such approaches.There is some evidence that women's increased engagement in food systems, and specifically the commercialization of food systems can lead to greater empowerment of women and increased control over incomes (Rubin et al., 2009). A synthesis of multiple studies focused on gender and market-oriented agriculture in Asia and Africa concluded that for well-designed interventions it was possible for such projects to increase women's incomes as well as their control over their assets and incomes (A. R. Quisumbing et al., 2015). However, many of these dynamics may differ by context and for populations within these contexts (David, 2015;Malapit et al., 2020;A. Quisumbing, Heckert, et al., 2021).Additionally, lessons learned across a wide range of studies demonstrate that there are significant barriers to women's integration into markets. In a study of milk traders in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya, Galie and colleagues (2022) found that milk retail businesses were more profitable for men, compared to women, because of the difficulties that women experienced sourcing milk. Constraints on women's freedom of movement and their agency over how they spend their time leads them to purchase milk at higher prices and puts them at the risk of purchasing spoiled milk. Across multiple countries in sub-Saharan Africa, labor and resource (capital) constraints are the primary factors preventing women farmers from being able to produce a marketable surplus (Djurfeldt, 2018). Moreover, women often lose control over assets and the sale of marketable agricultural products as products increase in value and men gain control of these products (Forsythe et al., 2016;Manzanera-Ruiz et al., 2016) Soutenir l'Exploitation Familiale pour Lancer l'Elevage des Volailles et Valoriser l'Economie Rurale 1 (SELEVER) is a gender-sensitive food systems intervention that focuses on the poultry value chain and nutrition. It was designed to target both producers and consumers to increase both the supply of and demand for poultry. SELEVER was implemented by Tanager International in western Burkina Faso and evaluated by IFPRI using a cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) study design (Gelli et al., 2017). The study was also accompanied by formative qualitative research, a process evaluation, and indepth qualitative research focused on gender at the midpoint of project implementation. Women's empowerment, which is the focus of this paper, is one of the pre-specified secondary trial outcomes.Previous papers have reported on the results of the other trial outcomes. SELEVER had only a minimal impact on diets and micronutrient intake (positive impacts on egg consumption in 2-to 4-year-olds at endline) (Becquey et al., 2022). SELEVER had a significant, although relatively small, impact on women's poultry outcomes (ownership, profits, and revenue); these impacts are primarily attributable to a shift in considering the poultry as an asset that is jointly owned with male household members to labeling it women-owned (Leight et al., 2022). Even this small shift, however, is meaningful considering that women have limited control over assets in this context (Njuki & Mburu, 2013). With regards to women's empowerment specifically, analysis of lean season impacts, which were assessed midway through program implementation, found that there were no impacts on either women's time use or their selfefficacy (only empowerment indicators collected in the lean season) (Leight et al., 2021). Our results, herein, find no significant impact on women's empowerment at endline, even after considering whether there were differential impacts among those who participated in program activities (treatment on the treated analysis) or among those with larger flocks.In the following sections we describe our study methods and results in detail. We then reflect on the null findings, including potential explanations for them, as well as what they mean for the design and implementation of future projects that aim to empower women through market-focused agriculture.Burkina Faso, located in the West African Sahel, is one of the least economically developed countries and consistently ranks in the bottom 10 in the Human Development Index Women in Burkina Faso are economically active and contribute significantly to agricultural labor.They play a key role in poultry production but have limited freedom of movement and access to poultry markets; husbands and sons typically take women's poultry to market and/or sell it to traders (Gelli et al., 2017). In the study area, there is also a sizeable gender gap in poultry ownership and access to poultry services; women own smaller flocks and have less access to veterinary and agricultural extension services (Gelli et al., 2017).The SELEVER intervention aimed to increase poultry production, improve the nutritional status of women and children, and empower women in the Centre Ouest, Hauts-Bassins, and Boucle de Mouhoun regions of Burkina Faso. The program addressed poultry production, nutrition, and gender through two complementary components: one on poultry production and marketing, the other on nutrition and gender. An intensive water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) component (SELEVER+WASH)focused on health and hygiene related to poultry management was delivered to a subset of the treatment group (Gelli et al., 2017). within households and the community on entrepreneurship, nutritious food production, marketing, consumption, and child health, feeding and care.SELEVER was evaluated using a cluster-randomized controlled trial in 120 rural and peri-urban clusters. Among the 120 study clusters, 60 were randomly assigned to the SELEVER treatment arm, the SELEVER+WASH treatment arm, and the control arm. Study households were identified based on having a woman aged 15-49 years who had at least one child aged 2-4 years living in the household at baseline. In the first stage of randomization for the main trial comparisons, 30 communes each were selected for the treatment and control arms and two villages were selected per commune using restricted randomization. In brief, the restricted randomization procedure modelled selection using commune-and village-level variables from the national census of 2006, including population size, existence of a government center, number of women's associations, main agricultural crop, main source of revenue, market access, health center presence, number of functional boreholes, and number of functional wells.An algorithm was developed using Stata to randomly allocate communes to two groups stratifying by region, and then select two villages in each commune from the list of available villages. In the second stage of randomization for comparison between SELEVER and SELEVER+WASH, 15 communes each were selected for the SELEVER, SELEVER+WASH, and control arms using a similar restricted randomization procedure. More complete details on the study protocol and randomization procedure have been published previously (Gelli et al., 2017). In this study, we focus the quantitative findings on results of the combined SELEVER and SELEVER+WASH treatment arms, as the gender strategy did not differ between the two arms, and the women's empowerment impact results for the two arms were similar.Additionally, qualitative work was integrated into the formative stage and at the study midpoint. Later in this paper, we summarize the methods and relevant findings from the midline qualitative study to triangulate findings and provide additional nuance to them.Baseline data were collected in March 2017 (post-harvest season) with a target sample of 1,800 households (15 households per village, 120 villages); 1,763 households were avaialable. Endline data collection began in March 2020, was postponed, due to the COVID19 pandemic, and resumed in August 2020. Additionally, lean season surveys were conducted in September 2017 and 2019 from a subsample of 1,080 households (90 villages). Each household was administered a household questionnaire focused on household characteristics and economic activities, an individual woman's survey to the woman primarily responsible for poultry activities, and an individual man's survey to the primary male decision maker. Anthropometry and other biomarker data were also collected. Attrition across the survey waves was minimal and has been described previously (Becquey et al., 2022;Leight et al., 2022) SELEVER's impact on women's empowerment was evaluated in collaboration with the Gender Assets and Agriculture Project, Phase 2 (GAAP2). GAAP2 aimed to develop the project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI) to measure the empowerment of men and women using a portfolio of 13 agricultural development projects and to use the common metric to identify what works to empower women in these projects. Pro-WEAI is a survey-based index for measuring empowerment, agency, and inclusion of women and men in the agriculture sector (Malapit et al. 2019 Malapit et al. (2019) and Heckert et al. (n.d.) Seven indicators of women's empowerment in nutrition and health are calculated, including decisions about own health and diet, decisions about health and diet during pregnancy, decisions about child's diet, decisions about weaning and breastfeeding, deciding to seek healthcare, decisions about purchasing food and health products, and access to food and health products. Pro-WEAI nutrition and health indicators are based on Heckert et al. (Heckert et al., n.d.).Count versions of 10 of the empowerment indicators are also created to assess robustness of the findings using binary indicators. For example, the count version of the group membership indicator is the number of community groups in which a respondent is an active member. Count versions are not feasible for autonomy in income and respect among household members due to the structure of survey items used to calculate these indicators. In addition, poultry-specific empowerment indicators are constructed, including decisions on poultry production, ownership of poultry, decisions on poultry income, and hours spent on poultry-related work. Table 1 shows definitions of all empowerment indicators.All pro-WEAI survey modules were collected at baseline and endline from the woman and man adult decision-makers in each household. Data related to work balance, self-efficacy, empowerment in nutrition and health were also collected during the two lean season surveys.The indicators that comprise pro-WEAI were developed in collaboration with the GAAP2 portfolio which brought together project implementors and researchers focused on women's empowerment in multiple contexts. Indicator developed was also informed by complementary qualitative research (Meinzen-Dick et al., 2019). When women in SELEVER communities were asked to describe empowered women, they were often described in terms of economic empowerment, both in terms of their control over assets, their ability to make decisions about household resources, and their ability to earn money, especially in support of their families (Eissler et al., 2020a). They were also described in relation to their ability to encourage people to do things as a group and to be able to express themselves publicly.These themes map closely to many of the instrumental and collective agency indicators in pro-WEAI.Nearly all households in the sample were dual adult households, defined as having at least one male and one female adult. Households were large (average 8.7 household members) and on average had more children under 15 than adults, and about half of households were polygynous. The male respondent was about 10 years older than the female respondent on average. Most men and women respondents did not speak French and were not literate in the local language (Table 2). Empowerment of both women and men was low at baseline. Woman achieved adequacy in about half of the 12 indicators of empowerment, and about 10 percent of women were empowered; men achieved adequacy in about two thirds of the 12 indicators of empowerment, and just under half of men were empowered. Few households achieved gender parity, meaning that women were rarely empowered or as empowered as the man in their household. Across all 12 indicators of empowerment, a higher proportion of men than woman achieved adequacy. Most men and women had adequate input in productive decisions, ownership of land and other assets, respect among household members, and control over use of income. Most men and women did not have adequate access to and control over financial services, group membership, and membership in influential groups. The gap between men and women was largest for work balance, where about 30 percent of women had work balance (meaning that they were not overworked), while about 75 percent of men experienced work balance (Table 3). The pro-WEAI results were also used to assess how much each indicator of empowerment contributed to women's and men's disempowerment. For both women and men, the largest contributors to disempowerment in the study population were access to and decisions on financial services, work balance, and membership in influential groups (Figure 1). Descriptive analyses revealed few changes in women's and men's empowerment between baseline and endline. There were small increases in the percentage of women and men adequate in selfefficacy (1.09 and 0.95 percentage points (pp) increase, respectively), a small decrease in the percentage of men adequate in autonomy in income (-1.54 pp), and a small increase in the percentage of households that achieved gender parity (3.34 pp).In terms of treatment effects, ANCOVA models revealed that there was no significant impact of the SELEVER program at endline on women's or men's empowerment when looking at the aggregate empowerment score or the binary empowered variable (Table 4). Additionally, there were no significant impacts on gender parity or the empowerment gap between women and men in the same household. The aggregate pro-WEAI indicators provide an overall view on empowerment, but they may mask changes in different directions for the individual indicators. Thus, in the next part of the analysis, we look more carefully at the individual indicators (both binary and continuous), as well as the aspects of these indicators that specifically pertain to poultry rearing. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, there were no significant impacts on women's or men's empowerment when looking at the individual binary indicators that comprise pro-WEAI (Tables 5) or indicators of empowerment in nutrition and health (Table 6), count indicators of empowerment (Tables 7), or poultry-related indicators of empowerment (Tables 8). (Prior to applying Bonferroni corrections, the only significant impact was a decrease in women's perception of mutual respect among household members.) Of note, there is reason for the null finding related to women's work balance to be interpreted in a positive light. The SELEVER intervention included multiple activities that could have increased women's time burden, and the program also focused on raising awareness of women's time burden among men and community members. Thus, the lack on negative impact on work balance may be the result of programmatic efforts to mitigate the intervention's burden on women's time.We conducted supplementary analyses to examine the robustness of these findings. Using propensity score weighted regression analysis, we considered, separately, whether the program had an impact among those who participated in the nutrition and gender component and among those who participated in SELEVER as a whole. The only positive estimated average treatment effect, after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, was an increase in membership in influential groups among women who participated in SELEVER as a whole (Appendix Table A1). This finding is logical given that the poultry portion of the intervention was delivered via poultry producer groups. After accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, there were no additional impacts on other indicators or by participation in the nutrition and gender component.Additionally, we looked at the heterogeneity of impact by examining whether there were differential impacts between those who owned large (>20) compared to small flocks. After accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, we did not find significant impacts on any of the empowerment outcomes (Appendix Table A2). 2020a, 2020b). Given the lack of impact on the frequency of women visiting important places, it seems that these changes in men's perceptions and the behaviors of some women in the community did not trickle down to actual changes in household gender relationships during the period covered by the study.Overall, evidence from the qualitative study concludes that although SELEVER has led to some genderrelated changes, they may be relatively small-scale changes in terms of moving the needle on women's empowerment.Our results provide rigorous evidence that SELEVER, a multisectoral gender-and nutrition-sensitive intervention that focused on the poultry value chain in western Burkina Faso, did not lead to measurable increases in women's empowerment across program beneficiaries. The one exception to this is that the null finding on women's work balance suggests that the intervention may have been able to mitigate women's increased labor burden due to the intervention. The lack of impact on women's empowerment occurs even though the program implemented a range of gender-sensitive strategies (Johnson et al., 2018) and despite measuring women's empowerment using the pro-WEAI, which is sensitive enough to detect impact in similar types of projects with comparable or smaller sample sizes(A. Quisumbing et al., 2022;Seymour et al., 2022). Additionally, we conducted supplementary analyses in which we analyzed the effects of treatment on the treated (i.e., only examined effects among those who participated in the program, as opposed to those who were targeted for the program) and examined heterogeneous impacts by flock size; similarly, we found no impact on women's empowerment. These results leave unanswered questions as to why there were no detectable impacts on women's empowerment. In this discussion we consider potential explanations for the null findings. We elaborate these explanations with supporting qualitative evidence from SELEVER, recent findings from other gender-sensitive agricultural development projects, and the results of the primary trial outcomes published elsewhere (Becquey et al., 2022;Leight et al., 2022).We consider three potential explanations for SELEVER's lack of impact on women's empowerment.First, SELEVER may have used too light of a touch in its intervention, a hypothesis that has also been considered as an explanation for the limited impact on poultry production (Leight et al., 2022). Second, there are high levels of disempowerment in the study population, and SELEVER may not have targeted the domains of empowerment where women are most disempowered. Finally, the study population may have been too poor to fully invest in the demands of the market-oriented intervention. Yet, despite the high levels of poverty in the study area, SELEVER did not transfer assets, further limiting the potential for impact. We explore each of these explanations in greater depth.The first explanation for the lack of program impact is that SELEVER may have been too light in terms of the depth of activities delivered, as well as participation by intended beneficiaries. SELEVER primarily delivered information to producers and consumers to strengthen market linkages and chose to focus on providing a lighter intervention with small amounts of exposure to these services to a larger number of beneficiaries, instead of targeting fewer beneficiaries more intensely. The results of SELEVER's impact on poultry production outcomes demonstrate that participation in many of the program components was low and that there were only small impacts on poultry production outcomes (Leight et al., 2022). The gender trainings and women's empowerment component of the intervention was most closely integrated into the delivery of the nutrition component, but also aimed to cut across other aspects of the design, especially in terms of the gender-sensitive nature of the project's approach to increasing women's involvement in and empowerment from poultry production. However, the lack of integrated coverage of program components may have limited the potential for program impacts on women's empowerment.Another explanation is that, although SELEVER used a carefully considered multipronged approach for increasing women's empowerment, it may not have targeted the areas of empowerment where women were most disempowered and that could have had the biggest influence on women's lives.In decomposing the contributors to disempowerment using the pro-WEAI, we found that the three largest areas of disempowerment for women in the study area at baseline were \"access to and decisions on credit and financial services,\" \"work balance,\" and \"membership in influential groups.\" Although SELEVER aimed to link women with existing credit sources, this aspect of the program was not particularly successful, as no impact was found on women taking loans (Leight et al., 2022). Qualitative data suggested that the size and terms of the loans available via SELEVER partners were often not agreeable to women who sought these loans, often because payments were due at times that did not coincide with when women made profits from poultry rearing (Eissler et al., 2020a). Additionally, women must often seek their husband's permission to participate in savings and loans groups, and men often request that their wives take loans for men's own use (Eissler et al., 2020a).Additionally, the potential of a market-focused intervention like SELEVER to empower women relies a great deal on women's ability to maintain control over the income they are generating. The qualitative study results found that it may have been difficult for women to maintain strong control over poultry-related income. Women in SELEVER communities indicated that the most common source of disagreement with their spouses was how to manage and invest income, especially poultry income (Eissler et al., 2020b). Regardless of who is involved in poultry rearing activities, it is considered the male household head's decision whether to slaughter or kill a chicken, and a woman would not be able to do so without her husband's permission, even if she owned the chicken (Eissler et al., 2020a). It is commonly expected in the study area that women would receive the income from any of her poultry sold by her husband and that she can allocate it to specific needs in the household. In practice, however, she may have limited overt control over this income, especially when her husband knows the amount and when she received it.A final explanation for the lack of impact on women's empowerment may be that the depth of both disempowerment and poverty in Burkina Faso are too much to overcome in the scope of a community-level development project that functions over a relatively short period and at relatively low intensity, especially when that intervention does not provide asset transfers. As described earlier in this paper, Burkina Faso consistently ranks in the bottom 10 countries according to the Human Development Index and that women's educational attainment and literacy are low, while the acceptability of wife beating is high. However, projects that take place in countries with similarly low levels of human development and poor conditions for women have demonstrated impacts on women's empowerment (Benali et al., 2020;Hillesland et al., 2022;Janzen et al., 2018;A. Quisumbing, Ahmed, et al., 2021).Additionally, other projects implemented in Burkina Faso have led to measurable impacts on women's empowerment (Heckert et al., 2019;Olney et al., 2015). Thus, although Burkina Faso is an exceptionally challenging environment, it is unlikely that these characteristics alone can explain the lack of impact of SELEVER on women's empowerment.Additionally, SELEVER did not address financial barriers, as it did not directly transfer assets to beneficiaries. In low-income settings, targeted asset transfers have previously been shown to be an essential, but not sufficient, approach for ensuring that agricultural development programs empower women and that gender-sensitive approaches can help women maintain control over these assets (A. R. Quisumbing et al., 2015;Roy et al., 2015;van den Bold et al., 2015). In fact, most small-holder agricultural interventions in Burkina Faso include some sort of asset transfer. Helen Keller International's Enhanced Homestead Food Production program is one such model, which provided women beneficiaries with two chickens and basic agricultural implements for cultivation. Evaluations of this program found that women in study arms that received assets were able to maintain control over these assets and attained higher levels of empowerment; moreover, attitudes in the wider community become more favorable towards women's asset ownership (Olney et al., 2015;van den Bold et al., 2015) The asset transfer debate is important, as funders and implementers are often concerned about avoiding \"give-away\" programs.Such programs may be costly to implement, and there are often concerns that beneficiaries will become dependent on program handouts (Gautam, 2019;Handa et al., 2018;Lentz et al., 2005). SELEVER was a market-based intervention that targeted relatively poor households in an exceptionally resource poor context. The program wagered much of its success on whether small-scale producers were willing to invest their own funds in infrastructure (e.g., henhouses) and veterinary care. Most households in SELEVER communities had very little to invest, especially for a risky investment (poultry mortality is high) (Leight et al., 2022). While concerns about asset transfers being too generous may be appropriate in some contexts, in the case of SELEVER women may have been more willing to invest in poultry if they had the resources to support doing so. Labeling these assets as \"women's\" may have helped women maintain active control over the assets as has been demonstrated in the design of some financial tools (Buvinic & o'Donnell, 2016;O'Sullivan, 2017). Overall, it may be important to reframe concerns about interventions that include asset-transfer in terms of the types of contexts or programs where asset transfers can make an important and meaningful difference in program outcomes.We can reflect on outcomes from across the SELEVER trial using the Reach-Benefit-EmpowerFramework. The framework classifies gender-sensitive strategies in terms of whether they reach (e.g., include them in program activities), benefit (e.g., increase income or improve nutritional status), or empower women (increase their ability to make strategic life choices) (Johnson et al., 2018). In terms of reaching women, approximately half of households reported attending a SELEVER training in the 2019 survey (while implementation was in progress) and approximately 30% reported having attended a SELEVER training in the 2020 endline survey (Leight et al., 2022). Evidence from the analysis of the poultry-related primary outcomes of the trial highlighted substantial positive effects of SELEVER on production of poultry owned by women (Leight et al., 2022). However, these positive effects were counterbalanced by negative effects for poultry that was jointly owned by women and men (and weakly positive effects for poultry owned by men). This suggests some \"relabeling\" with households, in which exposure to the SELEVER intervention resulted in women identifying previously jointly owned poultry as their own. This finding is suggestive of small, measurable benefits to women. On the other hand, there was no impact on women's diets (Becquey et al., 2022). In terms of empowerment, however, in this work, we determine that there were no measurable shifts in women's empowerment. Overall, SELEVER did an adequate job reaching women; was able to provide some benefits in the area of poultry production, but not for women's diets; but there is no evidence that the program empowered women.Considering SELEVER's lack of impact on women's empowerment and potential reasons for these outcomes, it is worth focusing on the overarching question of whether a food systems intervention can empower women. As highlighted in the emerging literature on this topic, there is evidence that gender-sensitive food systems interventions that focus on marketing have the potential to benefit women in terms of their livelihoods and potentially empower women (Johnson et al., 2018; A. Quisumbing, Access to food and health products (women) -0.072 0.060 3248 -0.115 0.060 *p<0.05, **p<0.0014 (threshold adjusted using Bonferroni correction for 37 tests) Notes: Estimates shown are estimated treatment impact on the treated using difference-in-difference estimation with treated individual identified using propensity scores. The left columns show results using propensity scores based on engagement in the nutrition and gender components of SELEVER; the right columns show results using propensity scores based on engagement in the full SELEVER intervention. Standard errors are clustered at the commune level. N indicates total number of observations in the difference-in-differences estimation. Notes: Estimates shown are treatment effect estimates using analysis of covariance models, controlling for whether the household was a large poultry producer (20 birds or more) and the interaction between treatment and large producer. Models also control for household size and age of respondent. Standard errors are clustered at the commune level."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1405342044.json b/main/part_2/1405342044.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c3a958f19510ce704cdb47448eb80e71e821acf --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1405342044.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f473db28fc08ba00ac4d61d9482ac15c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2c29b177-8b78-41a9-8d58-6298a51aa73b/retrieve","id":"956576249"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d2ba76e9-4786-4808-a1fe-ae17c5d76af1","content":"En 1980 se dio énfasis al estudio de las enfermedades presentes, a los cambios en severidad de las mismas y al comportamiento de los clones de yuca en cada uno de cinco ecosistemas diferentes. Se está investigando para identificar resistencia de tipo amplio a los problemas bióticos existentes y determinar su estabilidad en estos ecosistemas.En este año se investigó la relación entre la reacción de la planta al añublo bacteria! de la yuca (CBB) en el i.nvemadero y en el campo, así como su estabilidad a través de varios ciclos continuos. Se iniciaron estudios en el campo para examinar las diferencias en la severidad de CBB, superalargamiento y antracnosis en parcelas monoclonales y multiclonales a -niveles altos y bajos de inóculo.Se encontró la fase sexual del agente causal del superalargamiento y se está investigando su implicación en las interacciones hospedero-patógeno. En CIAT-Palmira se identificó la pudrición de la raiz y del tallo causada por Diplodia, enfermedad que con CBB, cuero de sapo y otras de tipo viral constituyen el grupo de enfermedades de la yuca más severas para la producción y distribución de material vegetativo de siembra.Se realizaron estudios etiológicos sobre la caracterización del agente causal de la enfermedad cuero de sapo.Selección por resistencia. Las reacciones de la planta a la infección del añublo bacterial de la yuca (CBB) fueron muy similares bajo condiciones controladas (a través de la técnica de inoculación por corte de hoja, CIAT, Informe Anual 1 975) y durante el primer ciclo de evaluación bajo condiciones de campo.El patógeno se encontró invadiendo los tallos a Jos 5 cm del suelo, tanto en genotipos susceptibles como en aquellos con resistencia intermedia y en genotipos resistentes; sin embargo, el grado de recuperación del patógeno en los genotipos susceptibles fue mayor que en Jos otros dos. Aunque la invasión bacteria! a través del sistema vascular correlacionó positivamente entre los tipos susceptibles evaluados según los síntomas externos (r-0.914 para la reacción en el invernadero y 0.927 para la reacción en el campo, ambas significativas al nivel de 0.1 %), se observaron varias excepciones.Puesto que el patógeno tiene baja actividad pectinásica, los tejidos maduros de tallos infectados pueden aparecer libres de síntomas; las células bacteriales que sobreviven en los vasos del xilema de estos tallos maduros utilizados como material de siembra, se mueven sistémicamente a través de los tejidos de plantas jóvenes, las cuales a su vez sirven como fuente de inóculo en el próximo ciclo.En consecuencia, cuando Jos grados de resistencia de un material se asignan después de sólo un ciclo de evaluación en el invernadero o en el campo, la proporción de estacas infectadas de genotipos aparentemente resistentes o de resistencia intermedia aumenta después de varios ciclos de siembra continua. El uso continuo de dicho material \"resistente .. podría implicar un descenso progresivo en la densidad de la población de plantas debido a la falta de germinación, a una reducción en el vigor de las plantas a causa de la pudrición bacterial de la raíz y a una aparición temprana de epidemias severas.Lo anterior se corroboró con los resultados obtenidos después de sembrar varios genotipos en Carimagua durante cuatro ciclos, usando material de siembra de dicha localidad (Figura 1 ). Debido a la baja fertilidad del suelo en esta región, la producción de material de siembra disminuyó hasta cerca del 60% de la obtenida con el material de ClAT-Palmira. Aunque los genotipos resistentes (grupo 1, Figura 1 ), en los que la infección bacterial en el tallo fue muy baja o nula, produjeron una cantidad constante de estacas durante un período de cuatro ciclos, Jos otros genotipos resistentes o intermedios sólo sobrevivieron durante dos o tres ciclos (grupos JI y 111 , Figura 1 ). Los genotipos susceptibles se eliminaron durante el primero o el segundo ciclos... La intormación indica la gran importancia que tiene la condición sanitaria del material de siembra sobre la estabilidad del genotipo, la existencia de genotipos con resistencia durable a CBB en Manihot esculenta y la necesidad de evaluar el material ensayándolo en el campo por varios ciclos continuos en áreas en donde CBB sea endémica, para identificar exactamente los genotipos con resistencia durable a CBB. La evaluacion final de resistencia sería el resultado de datos sobre la reacción de la planta, la producción de estacas y la calidad del material de propagación.Epidemiología. En Media Luna y Carimagua se han encontrado considerables fluctuaciones anuales en el 20 ataque de CBB. Esto sugiere la necesidad de evaluaciones continuas durante años para identificar niveles suficientemente buenos de resistencia durable.Agente causal. Se ha encontrado la fase sexual del agente causal del superalargamiento (Sphaceloina manihotico/a), la cual se ha observado en abundancia en varias localidades.Tomando como base los estudios morfológicos de muestras colectadas c:n Carimagua, CIAT-Quilichao, Media Luna y México, esta fase se ha identificado tentativamente como un loculoascomyceto, una de las especies de Elsinoe; la revisión de literatura preliminar indica que ésta puede ser una especie no descrita; las fases de crecimiento del hongo se muestran en la Figura 2. Con una excepción, todas las fases sexuales conocidas de las especies de Sphace/oma son Elsinoe.Los aislamientos de ascosporas individuales produjeron colonias de S. manihotico/a, ti picas y similares a las descritas para otros miembros del género. Los cultivares susceptibles inoculados con estas colonias mostraron síntomas caracteri sticos de superalargamiento y el aislamiento repetido produjo S. manihotico/a. Esta fase sexual, que es bastante común, sugiere que el patógeno puede ser patogénicamente varia ble. Las observaciones preliminares de campo y experimentos previos en el laboratorio sostienen la existencia de razas• fisiológicas (ver abajo y ClAT Informe Anual, 1977); se ha iniciado una minuciosa investigación al respecto.Epidemiología. En Carimagua se inició un experimento multiclonal para probar la influencia de variedades con resistencia variable sobre el desarrollo de epidemias y sobre el rendimiento (producción de raíces y estacas).Se sembraron ocho variedades de tal manera que dos plantas de la misma variedad no quedaran adyacentes; se sembraron parcelas puras para comparación, tanto cerca de las parcelas multiclonales como a 2 km de distancia de cada variedad. Debido a que la información es preliminar e incompleta sólo se presentan algunos de los resultados más interesantes.La Figura 3 muestra que en las parcelas multiclonales las variedades presentaban un poco más severidad de superalargamiento que las mismas variedades en las parcelas puras. De acuerdo con evaluaciones de campo durante el período favorable a la enfermedad, las plantas de CMC 40 actuaron como foco para subepidemias en las parcelas multiclonales; así al intercalar una variedad susceptible con variedades más resistentes parece que se aumentó el nivel total de severidad en todas las variedades en vez de inducir protección en la variedad susceptible.Esto es contrario a lo que se esperaba de acuerdo con las investigaciones epidemiológicas llevadas a cabo con cereales; para el próximo año se están planeando investigaciones con el fin de clarificar estos resultados.Es interesante comparar la severidad de la enfermedad en CMC 40 y en otras variedades dentro del sitio multiclonal y entre este sitio y el localizado a 2 km de distancia, en donde la severidad del superalargamiento era muy superior.En el sitio multiclonal, todas las variedades que se consideraban resistentes o de resistencia intermedia según evaluaciones de años recientes, fueron más afectadas que esas mismas variedades en el sitio distante; este hecho fue muy notorio en CMC 40 (Figura 3).Considerando el nivel de la enfermedad en las variedades susceptibles sembradas aliado de CMC 40 y el de las otras variedades resistentes, los bajos niveles de la enfermedad en éstas, no se podrl~n deber a escapes. La diferencia en susceptibilidad dentro de un clon bajo condiciones ambientales más o menos uniformes es consistente con la existencia de razas fisiológicas del patógeno. A&ente causal. En el Valle del Cauca en Colombia se observaron severos brotes de pudrición radical y del tallo, causados por Diplodia. Esta enfermedad se ha registrado como una de las más serias en las plantaciones brasileñas de yuca, así como en Africa, India y Cuba.El agente causal se aisló e identificó como Diplódia manihotis Sacc., que puede ser sinónimo con Botryod_iplodia manihoticola Petr.; la confirmación de esta sinonimia aguarda estudios taxonómicos adicionales.El hongo produce grupos de picnidios sobre las estructuras del estroma situadas debajo de los tejidos epidermales, que son necrosados. Los picniósporos inmaduros son transparentes y los maduros están formados por dos células oscu,ras de paredes gruesas; estas células son liberadas cuando se abre el picnidum, lo que ocurre en su mayor parte durante periodos de lluvia.Se está investigando la penetración, el establecimiento y la invasión del hongo.EpidemiolO&'-• Existen dos fases en la enfermedad. La primera fase es una pudrición radical cuya infección se inicia a partir de suelos infestados, o por el uso de estacas enfermas tomadas de plantas enfermas. En este caso, el hongo que es un parásito facultativo, puede infestar el suelo y permanecer indefinidamente como saprófito; cuando las plantas se infectan muestran deterioro en la rai z, marchitez repentina y muerte, con sin tomas similares a los inducidos por otros patógenos que causan pudriciones radicale.s.La segunda fase es la pudrición en el tallo, generalmente inducida por la invasión sistémica a partir de las raíces o por una infecciól) de pjcniósporos sobre el tallo. El hongo invade la mayor parte de los tejidos del tallo produciendo gomosis, marchitez. repentina parcial o total, muerte descendente y necrosis del floema y del xilema. Los picnidios se producen fácilmente sobre la epidermis de los tallos infectados. Durante esta segunda fase, las raíces y los tallos maduros pueden permanecer sin síntomas; los tallos infectados sistémicamente pueden no exhibir síntomas externos y ser erróneamente seleccionados para material de siembra.Los sin tomas de esta enfermedad se pueden confundir con los causados por antracnosis, muerte descendente por Phoma y superalargamiento, CBB, estrés por sequia, salinidad, insectos y arañita roja; sin embargo, el agente causal se puede identificar fácilmente por las características de los picnidios y picniósporos producidos. El hongo se disemina a través de largas distancias por medio de las estacas infectadas que se transportan como material de siembra; dentro de una plantación, probablemente el viento y la salpicadura del agua de lluvia sean más importantes para la diseminación de picniósporos, aunque algunas veces también pueden serlo la maquinaria para preparación de la tierra y el agua de riego.La viruela se ha encontrado en Colombia asociada con un insecto chupador subterráneo (Cydnidae) que causa el daño inicial, aunque también otros agentes como los nemátodos pueden causar daños similares y podrían iniciar el desarrollo de sí o tomas similares.El insecto, que se describe en el capitulo sobre entomología del presente informe, introduce su estilete a través de la epidermis y de la corteza de la raíz dañando los tejidos de la misma e inoculándolos con microorganismos del suelo, ho-ngos en su mayora. A partir de estas lesiones se han aislado varias especies de hongos que, por inoculaciones artificiales hechas simulando el daño del insecto, han inducido síntomas similares (Figura 4). Viruela de la yuca inducida 24 horas después de inocular la raíz con una aguja itifestada con suspensiones de esporas, aJi: 1 = tesligo; 2 = Genlcularla; 3 = Asperglllus; 4= Fusarium; 5=Pytbium.Los microorganismos causantes de la viruela degradan los tejidos de la raíz causando pudriciones que inicialmente son localizadas pero que luego pueden invadir la raíz entera a través del sistema vascular; las lesiones jóvenes son manchas de color café claro a oscuro.Los síntomas son más notorios y las lesiones más frecuentes en las raíces gruesas y durante los periodos de cosecha. Una zona contigua a las lesiones que presenta una fluorescencia azul clara aJ iluminarla con luz UV, sugiere que el mecanismo de deterioro podría estar relacionéJdo con el que ocurre en el deterioro fisiológico posterior a la cosecha.En 1980 se continuaron los estudios sobre caracterización del agente causal de la enfermedad conocida como cuero de sapo, con énfasis en aspectos de detección, transmisión y aislamiento.Un estudio cito lógico reveló considerable degeneración del floema de las raíces jóvenes que muestran síntomas del cuero de sapo, así como la presencia de inclusiones masivas que bloquean el parénquima del floema en estos tejidos. Ocasionalmente se detectaron inclusiones similares en el floema de los peciolos y en la nervadura central de las hojas de plantas enfermas, pero dichas i oclusiones no se detectaron en los tejidos del floema de plantas sanas. Sobre la base de estas observaciones se han sugerido como probables agentes causales organismos tales como micoplasma o virus limitados al floema.La posibilidad de que se trate de virus limitados al floema, tales como los del grupo closterovirus se está investigando actualmente; los resultados preliminares han demostrado la presencia de partículas de filamentos estacas se siembren a distancias menores de un metro. El daño natural de las raíces o la existencia de vectores en el suelo, sin embargo, no se han descartado como posibles mecanismos de transmisión. La transmisión a través de la semilla sexual no se ha observado en plantas de nueve meses cultivadas a partir de semillas de 46 clones diferentes de yuca afectados con la enfermedad cuero de sapo.Hast~ ahora no se han encontrado hospederos alternantes entre 50 especies de plantas que se han inoculado siguiendo los mecanismos convencionales.La fertilización con 200-200-100 kgf ha de N-P-K aumentó la expresión de síntomas especialmente en el cultivar M Col 22.Selecdón por resistencia durable a problemas bióticos. La evaluación del germoplasma en el pasado ha mostrado que existe la resistencia durable a problemas bióticos de cada ecosistema, aunque la frecuencia es relativamente baja.Las evaluaciones de las secciones de Patologla y ~ Entomología consisten en sembrar consecutivamente los genotipos en cada ecosistema; se utiliza material de siembra producido en el mismo ecosistema y al año siguiente se siembran los genotipos que sobreviven y producen material de siembra adecuado de buena calidad.El Cuadro 1 reúne los resultados obtenidos hasta ahora en este trabajo; se observa que en Popayán las variedades estables se podrlan identificar después del cuarto ciclo y en Carimagua después del tercero; en Media Luna, la estabilidad de las variedades seleccionadas no ha sido confirmada, hasta el tercer ciclo.Es importante insistir en que la resistencia identificada en estas evaluaciones no sólo parece incluir resistencia durable a todos los problemas bióticos que existen en el sitio de la evaluación sino también a los problemas abióticos del ecosistema.Relaciones yuca-ecosistema. Los estudios sobre ecosistemas se iniciaron en 1978 (CIAT, Programa de Yuca, Informe Anual 1979) y se continuaron durante elperíodo de 1979-1980, cuando se hizo la cosecha correspondiente al primer ciclo; los cultivares que produjeron material de siembra prosiguieron a un segundo ciclo.Todas las enfermedades y plagas identificadas durante 1979 en cada uno de los cinco ecosistemas del área de acción del Programa de Yuca se presentaron en 1980, con excepción de la enfermedad \"ceniza\" que se detectó por primera vezesteañoen Caribia y Media Luna(Cuadro 2). Sin embargo, en este año la antracnosis (causada por Colletotrichum spp. , diferentes especies para cada ecosistema) fue más severa en Caribia y Carimagua, que en los otros ecosistemas; la mancha parda también fue muy severa en Caribia y Media Luna, y la mancha blanca lo fue en Caribia.El chinche de encaje ( Vatiga spp.) que no tuvo importancia durante la época de lluvias de 1979, causó severos daños durante el mismo período de este año en Carimagua. Los trips fueron importantes en CIAT-Palmira, las moscas de las agallas en Carimagua y las cochinillas en Popayán. Las poblaciones y el daño de las arañitas rojas (especies Mononyche/lus y 0/igonychus) han aumentado considerablemente en el ecosistema de CIAT-Palmira. En ge neral. entre 1979 y 1980 se observaron t1uctuacwncs en la dinámica de las po blaciones. en la se'veridad de las enfermedades y en el daño de los insectos para cada ecosistema.Cuadro 1 R c~ultado' de l¡¡ 'dcccaon por n:~a~tencia durable a problemas biótaco~ de la yuca en tres cco>a>tcma'No. de genotipos por caclo contmuo de evaluación Las diferencias dentro y entre los cinco ecosistemas fueron considerables para las características que resume el Cuadro 3. La fluctuación del rendimiento en CIA T-Palmira fue similar a la de Caribia, pero los promedios en estos ecosistemas fueron notablemente mayores que en los otros tres; el número de estacas y la producción de almidón también tuvieron un comportamiento semejante al del rendimiento. Las diferencias en las fluctuaciones y en los promedios para el índice de cosecha y para el contenido de HCN fueron similares en todos los ecosistemas. Sólo en CIA T -Palmira y Popayán se encontró una amplia fluctuación en la susceptibilidad al deterioro; en los otros ecosistemas la mayoria de los cultivares fueron notablemente resistentes.En general, los rendimientos y en especial el indice de cosecha correlacionaron bien entre todos los ecosistemas excluyendo Popayán; no obstante CIAT-Palmira correlacionó con Carimagua solamente en índice de cosecha.Las correlaciones que se hicieron respecto al contenido de HCN fueron generalmente bajas, y tanto la suscep-tibi1idad al deterioro fiSiológico como el número de estacas no presentaron ninguna relación entre los ecosistemas, excepto para Carima~ua y Media Luna.Popayán fue obviamente diferente de los otros ecosistemas. Los cultivares mejores allí, conocidos como las variedades regionales, produjeron bajos rendimientos en los demás ecosistemas y especialmente en la costa norte colombiana (Caribia); igualmente, los cultivares locales de la costa norte no tuvieron buen comportamiento en Popayán.Tomando como base estas relaciones, C lA T-Palmira y Caribia tienen algunas semejanzas, así como Media Luna las tiene con Caribia y Carimagua, pero las diferencias entre los ecosistemas son aún considerables; así por ejemplo, el rendimiento, el contenido de almidón, el número de estacas, la evaluación general y la susceptibilidad al deterioro de la raíz en CIA T-Palmira no mostraron correlación significativa con Carimagua.Esto demuestra la importancia de llevar a cabo la selección varietal a nivel de ecosistema en la fase más temprana de cualquier programa de mejoramiento, lo que es particularmente verdadero para Popayán y Carimagua. La selección se debe continuar hasta que se logre la estabilidad en el rendimiento y en las características de selección, utilizando material de siembra producido en el sitio ; sin embargo, la alta correlación entre muchas caracteristicas en Media Luna y Carimagua sugiere que el material similar puede ser útil en ambos ecosistemas.Durante este año las dos áreas principales de investigación han sido el estudio de la variación encontrada en el campo dentro y entre cultivares con respecto a su susceptibilidad al deterioro, y el análisis de los procesos bioquímicos que llevan al deterioro fisfológico. En ambas áreas se ha logrado considerable progreso.Repetidas evaluaciones sobre la susceptabilidad al deterioro fisiológico mostraron que dentro de un cultivar se puede encontrar una amplia gama de valores (CIAT, Programa de Yuca, lnf orme Anual 1979). Para el cultivar más estudiado, M Col22, los valores máximo y mínimo de deterioro en CIAT-Palmira fueron de 98% y 18% respectivamente, en tanto que en otros sitios se encontraron valores aún más bajos (0% en Popayán y en Carimagua). Los valores obtenidos a partir de algunos otros cultivares mostraron patrones similares.La amplia fluctuación de la susceptibilidad dentro de un cultivar en un sitio dado, hace difícil o de dudosa validez la descripción de cultivares como \"resistentes\" o \"susceptibles\" al deterioro fisiológico. Estudios de poda. Se ha demostrado repetidamente que la poda de plantas antes de la cosecha reduce la susceptibilidad al deterioro fisiológico (CIAT, Programa de Yuca, Informe Anual 1979).Experimentos con plantas de M Col 22 han demostrado que el efecto• de la poda sobre la reducción del deterioro fisiológico ocurre aun sin eliminar los retoños del trozo podado, aunque inicialmente la pérdida de susceptibilidad es mayor en tratamientos con menos retoños. Se encontró además que el efecto de la poda, independientemente de la remoción de rebrotes dura mucho más que el informado previamente; a las nueve semanas o más después de la poda, las plantas aún no mostraban signos de pérdida de resistencia al deterioro fisiológico. No obstante, asociada con la poda hay una pérdida en la calidad de las raíces (reducido contenido de almidón) que se debe considerar. Estudios de la influencia del ecosistema sobre el deterioro f'tsiológico. En este año se realizaron evaluaciones sobre el deterioro de las raíces de 25 cultivares en cinco sitios de ecosistemas diferentes. Las diferencias de los cultivares entre los ecosistemas fueron grandes, sin mostrar correlaciones significativas; en Carimagua, Media Luna y Caribi:-\\, la mayoría de los cultivares mostró una marcada resistencia, no obstante su susceptibilidad en ClAT-Palmira y Popayán; en estos dos sitios se produjo la variación esperada en los porcentajes de deterioro.La correlación entre el porcentaje de deterioro y el contenido de almidón de las raíces (CIA T, Programa de Yuca, Informe Anual 1979) fue significativa sólo en ClAT-Palmira (r = 0.680, P = 0.001) y Popayán (r = 0.558, P = 0.01). En los gtros ecosistemas hubo una amplia variación en los contenidos de almidón, aunque todos los valores del porcentaje de deterioro fueron bajos.La defoliación causada por insectos, enfermedades o sequía en los meses anteriores a la cosecha han podido tener el mismo efecto que la poda, y en consecuencia inducir resistencia al deterioro fisiológico. En los tres ecosistemas donde se encontraron valores bajos en el porcentaje de deterioro había ocurrido una defoliación sustancial antes de la cosecha, causada tanto por factores bióticos como abióticos. Actualmente se realizan experimentos controlados para ver si la resistencia en el campo está relacionada con la severidad de la sequía y otros factores.El examen de las raíces bajo luz UV, entre 24 y 48 horas después• de la cosecha, reveló la presencia en el tejido del parénquima de una fluorescencia azul brillante que no se observó en las raíces recién cosechadas. Las áreas. fluorescentes fueron las primeras en desarrollar en los tejidos la pigmentación característica del deterioro fisiológico. En el CIAT y en TPI (J.E. Rickard), se han realizado observaciones durante el estudio microscópico del deterioro primario en raíces de yuca.Los estudios cromatográficos de J.l. Rickard en TPI han mostrado que el compuesto de la fluorescencia azul tiene períodos• de retención idénticos a los del escopoledn, un derivado de la cumarina. Estudios independientes en el Cl A T están de acuerdo con esta identificación. Las aplicaciones exogéneas de altas concentraciones (500 ugml-1 ) de escopoletín al tejido de raíces recientemente cosechadas induce una rápida e in tensa decoloración de los tejidos vasculares y del parénquima, idéntica a la que se encuentra en las raíces deterioradas naturalmente; la aplicación de una amplia gama de compuestos fenólicos relacionados no tuvo efectos sobre raíces sanas. El escopoletín aplicado a los tejidos de raíces podadas produjo una reacción idéntica a la del tejido de la raíz sin podar, lo cual sugiere que la resistencia en las rafees podadas no se debe a incapacidad para responder al escopoletín.Las raíces atacadas por varios hongos ( Aspergil/us sp., Fusarium spp. , etc.) también tuvieron áreas con fluorescencia azul y decoloración en los vasos alrededor de las áreas infectadas, lo que sugiere que la acumulación de escopoletín es una respuesta general al estrés en el tejido de la raíz."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1410539860.json b/main/part_2/1410539860.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b38b928e45c38b9800fde3a2f4a009f1ebda0d77 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1410539860.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"92e2f0987d3ae7e18784e4b67a788cb6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5f251ac9-d7f3-4f39-ad24-ea4a1a853bca/retrieve","id":"1210662287"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1af140ab-de09-43a4-8681-1476fcc429f6","content":"Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) causes high losses to rice production in Africa. Several sources of varietal high resistance are available but the emergence of virulent pathotypes that are able to overcome one or two resistance alleles can sometimes occur. Both resistance spectra and viral adaptability have to be taken into account to develop sustainable rice breeding strategies against RYMV. In this study, we extended previous resistance spectrum analyses by testing the rymv1-4 and rymv1-5 alleles that are carried by the rice accessions Tog5438 and Tog5674, respectively, against isolates that are representative of RYMV genetic and pathogenic diversity. Our study revealed a hypervirulent pathotype, named thereafter pathotype T9, that is able to overcome all known sources of high resistance. This pathotype, which is spatially localized in West-Central Africa, appears to be more abundant than previously suspected. To better understand the adaptive processes of pathotype T9, molecular determinants of resistance breakdown were identified via Sanger sequencing and validated through directed mutagenesis of an infectious clone. These analyses confirmed the key role of convergent nonsynonymous substitutions in the central part of the viral genome-linked protein to overcome RYMV1-mediated resistance. In addition, deep-sequencing analyses revealed that resistance breakdown does not always coincide with fixed mutations. Actually, virulence mutations that are present in a small proportion of the virus population can be sufficient for resistance breakdown. Considering the spatial distribution of RYMV strains in Africa and their ability to overcome the RYMV resistance genes and alleles, we established a resistance-breaking risk map to optimize strategies for the deployment of sustainable and resistant rice lines in Africa.First reported 50 years ago, Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) is a major biotic constraint to rice cultivation in Africa (Séré et al. 2013). RYMV is a viral species of genus Sobemovirus that is responsible for high rice production losses in agroecosystems in most rice-growing countries of Africa (Kouassi et al. 2005;Traoré et al. 2015). Highly adapted to the two cultivated rice species, Asian rice Oryza sativa and African rice O. glaberrima, RYMV has a narrow host range that also includes other wild Poaceae species (Bakker 1974). RYMV possesses a single-stranded RNA genome that is organized into five open reading frames (ORF) (Fig. 1A). Highly diverse, RYMV is classified into six major strains with a strong geographical distribution. Strains S1 and S2/S3 are found in West and West-Central Africa whereas strains S4, S5, and S6 are present exclusively in East Africa (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2015). This spatial pattern of RYMV diversity is explained by the absence of seedborne transmission and of long-distance movement (Allarangaye et al. 2006;Fargette et al. 2006;Konaté et al. 2001). In addition to short-distance propagation that is mainly mediated by beetles, RYMV is transmitted by contact during agricultural practices such as transplantation from rice nurseries to fields (Bakker 1974;Traoré et al. 2006b).In combination with the surveillance of seedbed contamination (Traoré et al. 2006b), varietal selection is the most efficient and sustainable way to manage RYMV. Several sources of resistance have been identified in the two cultivated rice species. Only two among the thousands of O. sativa tested accessions are highly resistant, whereas approximately 8% of the O. glaberrima accessions have the same phenotype of high resistance (Thiémélé et al. 2010). Several major resistance genes such as RYMV1, RYMV2, and RYMV3 have been reported (Albar et al. 2003;Pidon et al. 2017;Thiémélé et al. 2010). RYMV1 is the most studied and encodes the translation initiation factor eIF(iso)4G1 (Albar et al. 2006). Four RYMV1 resistance alleles have been identified, named rymv1-2 through rymv1-5, and characterized by single nonsynonymous mutations or short deletions in the central domain of the protein.Currently, only the rymv1-2 allele has been introduced in rice varieties (Bouet et al. 2013;Ndjiondjop et al. 2013). Because the deployment of resistance plants has not yet been performed at large scales and over long periods of time, their ability to sustain resistance under field conditions is still unknown. However, under controlled conditions, the resistance-breaking (RB) ability of isolates has been tested after inoculation of 114 and 84 isolates that are representative of the RYMV genetic diversity to Gigante and Tog5681 accessions, respectively (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007;Traoré et al. 2010). A proportion of the tested isolates was able to overcome the resistance of the rymv1-2 and rymv1-3 alleles (9 and 25%, respectively). The molecular mechanism involved in this phenomenon has been described. A direct interaction between the wildtype viral genome-linked protein (VPg) and the eIF(iso)4G1 of susceptible rice species is required for viral infection to occur (Hébrard et al. 2010). Mutations of the rymv1-2 and rymv1-3 alleles disrupt this interaction, resulting in the resistance phenotype (Hébrard et al. 2010). However, a residual multiplication of RYMV in resistant plants, as revealed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, allows the emergence of mutations in the central domain of the VPg (Poulicard et al. 2010;Traoré et al. 2010). Several convergent nonsynonymous substitutions were found in different strains. The role of the most frequent mutations at positions 41, 48, and 52 was experimentally validated: they restore the protein interaction with resistance alleles (Hébrard et al. 2008(Hébrard et al. , 2010)). Stepwise evolutionary processes were observed with the accumulation of RB mutations at positions 41 and 52 against the rymv1-3 allele or at codon 48 against the rymv1-2 allele (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007;Traoré et al. 2010).In most cases, the adaptability of RYMV isolates is restricted to only one of these two alleles. A glutamic acid/threonine (E/T) polymorphism located at position 49 of the VPg is associated with this contrasted RB ability. Isolates with genotype E49 only break the rymv1-2-mediated resistance of Gigante and are referred to as isolates of pathotype E. By contrast, those with the genotype T49 preferentially overcome rymv1-3-mediated resistance of Tog5681 and are referred to as isolates of pathotype T (Traoré et al. 2010). A viral fitness assessment showed that T49 is not only a molecular signature of rymv1-3 RB ability but also a genetic determinant of a past adaptation to O. glaberrima in the evolutionary history of RYMV (Poulicard et al. 2012). The East-African strains S4 and S5-S6, located in the center of origin of RYMV, harbor the ancestral trait E49. By contrast, strain S2-S3, which is distributed in West-Africa, harbors the derived trait T49. This region is the geographical distribution area of O. glaberrima (Traoré et al. 2005;Trova ˜o et al. 2015). Additionally, the S1 strain is divided into two main lineages, S1wa and S1ca, which correlate to their spatial distribution in West and West-Central Africa, respectively. Several independent T49 fixation events in these two lineages have been inferred phylogenetically, resulting in E/T polymorphism of this strain (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007). Finally, T49 confers a selective advantage in the susceptible African rice species compared with E49, regardless of the strain (Poulicard et al. 2012). Importantly, four isolates with T49 were efficiently able to overcome both rymv1-2and rymv1-3mediated resistances, suggesting the existence of a new pathotype (Traoré et al. 2006a(Traoré et al. , 2010)). Three of these four isolates belonged to the S1ca lineage. This lineage also revealed a high capacity to overcome RYMV2and RYMV3-mediated resistance from Tog7291 and Tog5307 accessions, respectively (Pidon et al. 2017;Pinel-Galzi et al. 2016).In this study, we assessed the resistance spectrum of the rymv1-4 through rymv1-5 alleles against a selection of isolates that are representative of the RYMV genetic and pathogenic diversity, including isolates with T/E49 from the S1ca lineage. This was done to obtain a complete overview of the RB abilities of RYMV toward all of the identified sources of resistance in rice. We identified and characterized a hypervirulent pathotype, named pathotype T9, that is able to overcome all known sources of high resistance. To better understand the adaptive processes of pathotype T9, molecular determinants of resistance breakdown were identified and their functional role was validated. Deep sequencing of the hypervirulent pathotype T9 was performed to investigate the resistance breakdown cases without fixed mutations. The consequences of these findings on the assessment and prediction of the emergence risks of RYMV virulent lineages are discussed in the context of resistance sustainability.Plant accessions and viral isolates. Two rice accessions were used as susceptible controls: O. sativa indica IR64 and O. glaberrima Tog5673 (International Rice Germplasm Collection number 96789). Four RYMV1-resistant accessions were assessed: O. sativa indica Gigante (rymv1-2 resistant allele) and O. glaberrima Tog5681 (rymv1-3), Tog5438 (rymv1-4), and Tog5674 (rymv1-5) (IRGC 96793,96751,and 96790,respectively) (Thiémélé et al. 2010). The plants were kept in a growth chamber under 12 h of illumination at 120 µE/m 2 /s, 28°C, and 60% humidity.Twenty RYMV isolates were used in this study (Supplementary Table S1). They are representative of the RYMV genetic and pathogenic diversity, and most of these isolates (16 of 20) have previously been inoculated to the rymv1-2and rymv1-3-resistant Gigante and Tog5681 accessions (Traoré et al. 2010). In addition to these well-characterized isolates, four new isolates from the S1ca lineage were included in this study as candidates for the new pathotype. They belong to the collection from Niger that was described previously (Traoré et al. 2010) or were recently collected in Togo (Oludare et al. 2016) and have previously been inoculated to the RYMV2and RYMV3-resistant Tog7291 and Tog5307 accessions (Pidon et al. 2017;Pinel-Galzi et al. 2016).Resistance spectrum assessment. The RYMV isolates were inoculated under controlled conditions. Each inoculum was prepared by grinding infected leaves (0.1 g/ml) in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.2. Extracts were mixed with a 600-mesh carborundum and then rubbed on the leaves of 14-day-old rice seedlings. Each RYMV isolate had previously been multiplied in the susceptible rice variety IR64 for further experiments. For the resistance assessment, each isolate was inoculated onto 18 to 24 plantlets of each resistant accession (5 plants by 4 pots) and onto 8 to 10 susceptible control plantlets. Leaves were collected 2 months after inoculation. Symptomatic plants with typical yellow mottling were analyzed individually via double-antibody sandwich enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with a polyclonal antiserum raised against an RYMV isolate from Madagascar (Fargette et al. 2002). Asymptomatic plants of the same pot were pooled together and then analyzed individually in the case of a positive pool.Sanger sequencing and validation of RB mutations. For each viral isolate-plant accession modality, two infected plants were randomly selected. For the new pathotype T9 candidate isolates, five samples per modality were selected. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen). The VPg and its 59 and 39 neighboring regions were specifically amplified via RT-PCR, as previously described (Hébrard et al. 2006), and sequenced using the Sanger technique. To identify RB mutations, the VPg sequences of the RB genotypes obtained via the Sanger technique were aligned using CLUSTALW with default parameters and compared with those of the corresponding wild-type genotype. To validate the functional role in resistance breakdown of the new convergent mutations R38Q and T43A in the VPg, as well as the influence of the T/E49 polymorphism, the mutants Cia38, Cia38/49, Cia43, and CIa43/49 were constructed via directed mutagenesis of the infectious clone CIa (T49) with a QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent) (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007;Traoré et al. 2010). The new clones were fully sequenced by the Sanger technique, as described previously (Fargette et al. 2004), to validate their conformity. Transcription of mutated clones and inoculation of viral RNA in the susceptible rice variety IR64 were performed as previously described (Poulicard et al. 2010). To assess the RB ability, each isolate was inoculated onto 15 to 20 plantlets of each resistant accession and onto 10 susceptible control plantlets. RB analysis was conducted as described above using DAS-ELISA for RYMV detection on symptomatic leaves 2 months after inoculation. The VPg of two samples randomly selected from each mutant was sequenced via the Sanger technique as described above to confirm the presence of the inserted mutations.Deep sequencing. For each of the isolates Ni1, Ng106, Ng119, and Tg274, two plants named A and B (from the Tog5674 accession, rymv1-5 allele and the corresponding inoculum from the susceptible control variety IR64) were randomly selected. The RYMV genome was amplified using a two-step process. First, specific fulllength reverse transcription was performed using the primer D AS (Fargette et al. 2004) and PrimeScript reverse transcription (Takara Bio Inc.). Second, the RYMV genome was amplified in two overlapping fragments using the primers A S /B AS and C S /D AS (Fargette et al. 2004) and ExTaq polymerase (Takara Bio Inc.). Libraries were constructed using 6-bp barcodes to allow for multiplexing, as previously described (Mariac et al. 2014). Briefly, PCR fragments of the same sample were bulked in equal equimolar conditions and sheared to a mean target size of 400 bp. Fragments were then repaired, ligated, nick filled in, and amplified via real-time PCR to complete the adapters and generate libraries that were ready for cluster generation and sequencing. Pair-end sequencing (2 × 150 bp) was performed on an Illumina MiSeq v3 platform at the CIRAD facilities (Montpellier, France), with approximately 12 pmol of the DNA libraries deposited on the flow cell.Demultiplexing was undertaken using a script that sorts reads as a function of a given list of barcodes (script available at DEMULADAPT; https://github.com/Maillol/demultadapt). The fastq files are available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archives (number SRP116739). Reads were analyzed using Galaxy workflows (Afgan et al. 2016;Giardine et al. 2005) implemented on the South Green bioinformatic platform. Briefly, reads were filtered based on their length and mean quality values (Q > 35), and adapters were removed using Cutadapt (Martin 2011) with the following parameters: minimum overlap length = 7 and minimum length after trimming = 35. Reads of each sample from susceptible plants (inoculum) were first mapped to the closest available full-length virus sequence to obtain a consensus sequence. In a second step, reads of each RB sample were mapped against this consensus sequence. Mapping was performed using BWA-MEM (Li and Durbin 2010) with the following parameters: maximum edit sequence = 0.06 and maximum difference in the seed = 5. After a sorting step with SortSam, the optical duplicates were removed with MarkDuplicates from Picard tools (http://picard.sourceforge.net), and reads were then realigned using Realigner Target Creator and Indel Realigner from the GATK package (McKenna et al. 2010). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were called using Samtools (Generate pileup) (Li et al. 2009) and Varscan Pileup2snp (Koboldt et al. 2009) with the following parameters: minimum base quality = 30, minimum read depth = 100, minimum supporting reads to call a variant = 10, and minimum variant allele frequency = 0.03. For the RB samples, only the SNP that were not detected in the inoculum (from susceptible plants) or SNP for which there was a frequency increase compared with the inoculum were considered. The ORF and the SNP positions were numbered after a realignment step with the reference sequence of the infectious clone CIa. Site conservation was determined according to the 33 published full-length sequences (Rakotomalala et al. 2013). SNP were considered to be rare or fixed when their frequency was < 10% or > 80%, respectively. VPg haplotypes were analyzed using a three-step Galaxy process (Bedtools, Samtools BAM-to-SAM, and SAM-to-Fasta). Then, the alignment was manually curated to remove incomplete reads, and the haplotype frequencies were calculated with DNAsp (Rozas et al. 2003).RYMV RB ability against highly resistant accessions. Twenty RYMV isolates were inoculated under controlled conditions onto four resistant plant accessions of the RYMV1 allelic series (Fig. 2). The viral isolates were selected to be representative of the RYMV genetic and pathogenic diversity based on the previous results of their phylogeny and their RB ability in the Gigante and Tog5681 accessions (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007;Traoré et al. 2010). Isolate candidates for the new pathotype able to overcome both rymv1-2 and rymv1-3 alleles were included in this study in order to provide a deeper assessment of their virulence spectrum. Viral adaptability was evaluated as a qualitative parameter defined by the ability of a given isolate to overcome the resistance of a given accession. By contrast, the resistance spectrum conferred by a given resistance allele was evaluated as a quantitative parameter that was estimated from the 20 RYMV isolates representative of the viral diversity in Africa.As expected, susceptible controls (8 to 10 inoculated plants/ isolate) were all infected (data not shown). Most of the resistant plants (18 to 24 inoculated plants/accession/isolate) did not develop any symptoms and viral multiplication was not detected by DAS-ELISA (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table S2). However, typical RYMV symptoms were observed for 520 of the 1,605 inoculated plants (i.e., 32% of the total number of resistant plants) 1 to 2 months after inoculation. Resistance breakdown was confirmed by DAS-ELISA, and RYMV was detected in each symptomatic plant. The resistant rice accessions and the RYMV isolates showed variable resistance spectra and different RB abilities (Fig. 2). Of the 80 viral isolate-plant accession modalities, 35 led to symptoms within 70% of the inoculated plants. As previously described (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007;Traoré et al. 2010), the resistance of the Gigante accession (rymv1-2 allele) was overcome by several isolates of pathotype E and the resistance of the Tog5681 accession (rymv1-3 allele) by isolates of pathotype T (Table 1). Additionally, and as expected, the five isolates with T49 originating from West-Central Africa were able to overcome the resistance provided by both the rymv1-2 and rymv1-3 alleles. Consistently, the adaptability of the Ng106 and Ng119 isolates to the Tog5681 accession was previously reported (Traoré et al. 2010).For the first time, the resistance spectra of the O. glaberrima accessions Tog5438 and Tog5674, which harbor the rymv1-4 and rymv1-5 alleles, respectively, were assessed with the same isolates. Similarly to the Tog5681 accession, the two tested accessions showed an efficient resistance to isolates from East Africa (Fig. 2). A different trend was observed with West and West-Central African isolates. On the one hand, rymv1-4-mediated resistance from the Tog5438 accession was overcome by most isolates from the S1 and S2-S3 strains, regardless of the pathotype. On the other hand, rymv1-5-mediated resistance showed a spectrum similar to that mediated by the rymv1-3 allele. Interestingly, the isolates from West-Central Africa (S1ca lineage) with a threonine at position 49 of the VPg and that were able to overcome the resistance of the Tog5681 accession also broke the resistance of the Tog5674 accession. Hence, these results confirmed that the isolates with T49 from the S1ca lineage defined a new pathotype, referred to hereafter as pathotype T9. Pathotype T9 is characterized by hypervirulence (i.e., the ability to overcome resistance mediated by all of the RYMV resistance genes and alleles).RB mutations detected via VPg sequencing and validated by directed mutagenesis. To better understand the adaptive processes of pathotype T9, 80 infected samples were randomly selected, and their VPg gene was amplified and sequenced via the Sanger technique. Only nucleotide transitions (purine to purine or pyrimidine to pyrimidine) were detected. They all resulted in nonsynonymous substitutions of amino acids with biochemical properties that were different from those of the wild-type isolates. The substitutions were located at positions 41, 43, and 52 of the VPg gene (Table 2). Consistent with previous findings (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007;Traoré et al. 2010), we found a histidine-to-tyrosine substitution at position 52 (H52Y) in the rymv1-2 and rymv1-3 RB genotypes and a serine-to-proline substitution at position 41 (S41P) in the rymv1-3 RB genotypes. For the first time, the VPg sequences of the rymv1-4 and rymv1-5 RB genotypes were sequenced. In the rymv1-4 RB genotypes, substitutions of threonine to alanine at position 43 (T43A) and S41P were observed. The substitution T43A was described previously in the rymv1-2 RB genotypes (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007). In the rymv1-5 RB genotypes, the substitutions were restricted to S41P and H52Y. Importantly, a mix between the wild-type nucleotide and its mutated alternative was found in 15 samples (Table 2; Supplementary Table S3), which indicates intrahost diversity and evolution of the viral population during the RB processes. Additionally, in three RB samples, two emerging mutations, S41P and either T43A or H52Y, were detected in the same sample; however, this sequencing technique cannot determine whether the samples contained a double-mutated genotype or two single mutants (Table 2). Two synonymous substitutions at positions 48 and 62 were detected in two rymv1-4 RB genotypes; they were isolate specific and belong to the Ng119 isolate. Thirty samples from the other strains and lineages were sequenced. The same major substitutions, S41P and H52Y, were identified. In addition to the T43A substitution, an asparagine-to-tyrosine substitution at position 42 (N42Y) was detected in the rymv1-2 RB genotypes from East Africa. An arginine-to-glutamine substitution at position 38 (R38Q) was identified in the rymv1-4 RB genotype from West Africa. A new specific substitution of the Ng109 isolate (i.e., a glutamic acid-to-lysine substitution at position 29 [E29K]) was detected in three rymv1-4 RB genotypes. Altogether, the most frequent mutations in the current study, as well as in previous studies (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007;Traoré et al. 2010), revealed convergence in the RB molecular determinants in the RYMV1 allelic series.Contrary to the role of the mutations at positions 41, 48, and 52, the role of the VPg convergent mutations R38Q and T43A in resistance breakdown have not been previously validated. We performed directed mutagenesis to introduce these mutations in the infectious RYMV clone and inoculated the mutants into plants from the RYMV1 allelic series (except rymv1-4, because of its low range and efficiency for resistance against isolates from West and West-Central Africa). The RB ability of each mutated clone was tested in combination with the E/T residue at position 49. The infectious clone CIa was used as a negative control in our study. Notably, this genotype has been previously reported to often overcome the resistance of rymv1-3 (and rarely rymv1-2) via the emergence of de novo RB mutations. The CIa52 genotype was used as a positive control. As expected, this genotype was efficient against rymv1-5 resistance, as well as against rymv1-2 and rymv1-3 resistance (Table 3). However, the RB efficiency of the CIa52/49 genotype was restricted to rymv1-2-mediated resistance. Replacing T49 with E49 prevented the efficiency of the H52Y mutation to overcome rymv1-3and rymv1-5-mediated resistances.The mutation T43A has already been reported in rymv1-2 and rymv1-3 RB mutants. In this study, it was detected to be associated with resistance breakdown in the three accessions tested (Gigante, Tog5681, and Tog5674) (>80% infected plants). The CIa43 genotype showed the same RB ability and efficiency as the CIa52 genotype. The combination of the T43A and T49E mutations prevented the infection of all RYMV1-resistant accessions, including Gigante. The mutation R38Q, which has already been reported in rymv1-2 RB mutants, was not able to overcome the rymv1-2 resistance in our study, even when combined with T49E. Interestingly, although it was never detected experimentally, the R38Q mutation inserted alone in the infectious clone CIa allowed it to overcome rymv1-3and rymv1-5-mediated resistances (>60% of infected plants). In combination with T49E, the R38Q mutation lost its RB function against resistant O. glaberrima accessions. Altogether, we conclude that single nonsynonymous mutations inserted in the central domain of the VPg at a restricted number of conserved positions allowed the breakdown of resistance in accessions with the RYMV1 allelic series depending on the residue at position 49 (Fig. 3). However, 66% of the sequenced VPg from the RB samples showed no mutations in comparison with the sequence from the wild-type isolate (54 of 80 samples from the hypervirulent pathotype T9 and 18/30 samples from the other pathotypes) (Table 2). Several hypotheses could explain this phenomenon: (i) isolates possess some intrinsic genetic properties to overcome resistant alleles without mutation, (ii) VPg mutations with a low frequency are not detected via Sanger sequencing, or (iii) RB mutations occur outside the VPg gene in the RYMV genome.RB mutations detected in the hypervirulent pathotype T9 via deep sequencing. To test these hypotheses, we performed deep sequencing of the full-length RYMV genome on samples with or without emerging or fixed mutations detected via Sanger sequencing. We focused on the Tog5674 accession (rymv1-5) and on the hypervirulent pathotype T9 (isolates Ni1, Ng106, Ng119, and Tg274 of the S1-ca strain), which showed the widest resistance and RB spectra, respectively. For each isolate, two independent RB samples (namely, A and B) were compared with the inoculum originated from susceptible plants (Fig. 1B). After amplification of the full-length RYMV genome in two overlapping fragments and the preparation of the libraries, tagged samples were multiplexed and sequenced using MiSeq Illumina technology.In total, 42 polymorphic sites were found along the RYMV genome from the inocula (susceptible plants) (Fig. 1B). Among them, 24 sites have been previously identified comparing the 33 published sequences representative of the RYMV genetic diversity. The number and positions of the polymorphic sites along the genome were highly variable, depending on the isolates. In total, 25 polymorphic sites were common in susceptible and resistant plants, and they were considered in the rest of the study only if their frequency increased compared with the inoculum. In the resistant plants, 42 RB candidate sites were found along the RYMV genome (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Table S4). They were located discontinuously in three main diversity hotspots in the 59 noncoding region, the VPg, and the polymerase genes. In total, 62% of the mutated sites were found to be strictly conserved at the nucleotide level compared with 33 RYMV sequences representative of RYMV genetic diversity (Fig. 1B). Only 25% of the mutations were fixed or close to being fixed (SNP frequency in the viral populations > 80%), whereas 52% of the mutations were rare (SNP frequency < 10%) and could not be detected via Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Table S5). Considering only the coding domains, 32 mutated sites were identified, and 23 of these (i.e., 72%) resulted in nonsynonymous substitutions. Interestingly, only 11 of these 23 mutated sites were strictly conserved at the amino acid level across the diversity of RYMV. They are the best candidates to explain the RB cases because the reference isolates exclusively originated from susceptible rice varieties. Nonsynonymous mutations represented 8% of the VPg amino-acids and 75% of the total number of mutations (6 of 8 mutations) in the VPg (Supplementary Table S6). Four of eight sites (positions 23, 41, 43, and 52) were strictly conserved in the reference sequences and were variable in our RB samples.Interestingly, very few mutations emerged independently in different modalities. We found only three cases of identical mutations between two samples of the same isolate inoculated with Ni1 and Ng119 in the protease and the VPg (Fig. 1B). These mutations were all fixed in the resistant plants, and one of these mutations in the VPg was also detected at a frequency of 49% in the inoculum originating from susceptible plants. In addition, three convergent mutations were found in two to six samples (from two to four different isolates) (Fig. 1B). All of these mutations were nonsynonymous substitutions located in the VPg at strictly conserved positions in the reference sequences (originating from a Symbols: + = RB and presence of the inserted substitutions and _ = no infection.b No infection in this study but RB with additional mutation acquisition previously published (Poulicard et al. 2014;Traoré et al. 2010).c RB obtained in this study but with additional mutation acquisition. susceptible plants) (Fig. 1A). These convergent mutations, detected via deep sequencing, correspond to mutations that were previously found in other samples via Sanger sequencing. The mutations H52Y, S41P, and T43A were found in six, five, and three samples, respectively, of eight samples total. Their frequency was highly variable depending on the sample (27 to 97, 5 to 32, and 6 to 10%, respectively). These substitutions were not detected in the inoculum. Haplotype analysis of the central domain of the VPg revealed that, in most of the samples, the mutations at positions 41, 43, and 52 were present independently in different RB genotypes (i.e., no mutation accumulation was detected) (Table 4). The unique exception was sample B of the isolate Ng119, in which all of the reads with the S41P mutation (6%) also contained the H52Y mutation.Overall, our study showed that, for the eight samples analyzed from the hypervirulent pathotype T9, (i) RB genotypes always contained mutations, (ii) most of the mutations were not fixed and could not be detected via Sanger sequencing, and (iii) RB mutations also occurred in genes other than VPg gene. However, considering the mutations identified via the Sanger and Illumina methods, the mutations in the VPg could explain all of the cases of resistance breakdown, except for that in Ng106 B, even with mutation frequencies below 32% (for instance, in Ng106 A) (Table 4).Strategies for breeding rice to resist RYMV have to consider several variable constraints such as the resistance spectra of the plants and RB abilities of the virus. Working under controlled conditions, our aim was to better assess and understand the influence of these parameters to predict resistance sustainability and to optimize deployment strategies, minimizing viral adaptation. Resistance breakdown first requires the emergence of mutations at the intrahost level. Although we cannot exclude the involvement of different RYMV genes in RYMV1-associated RB mechanisms as previously reported (Poulicard et al. 2014), VPg has a predominant role, as expected from the direct interaction with the eIF(iso)4G1 resistance factor. In our study, we showed that single mutations in the central part of the VPg are enough to overcome the entire RYMV1 allelic series. We confirmed that RB mutations occurred only at a restricted number of sites in this highly conserved protein and that the various RYMV strains and lineages followed strong convergent mutational pathways. In addition to the substitution H52Y, new multifunctional RB mutations were revealed at positions 38 and 43. The structural features of the VPg, an intrinsically disordered protein (Hébrard et al. 2010). and the vicinity of mutations in the same VPg-MIF4G interaction domain explained this multifunctionality. Mutation convergence occurred not only in different isolates but also in different resistant hosts, and the efficiency range of the H52Y, R38Q, and T43A mutations covered all of the RYMV1 alleles. The emergence of these mutations on one resistant accession could lead to the resistance breakdown of the others and could invalidate deployment strategies that alternate resistance alleles. In contrast to the previous hypotheses, we revealed, using deep sequencing, that mutation accumulation did not always occur, and that RB mutations emerged independently in different haplotypes. Unfortunately, when single mutations are sufficient to overcome resistance genes, the resistance sustainability is predicted to be low (Fabre et al. 2009;Harrison 2002;Lecoq et al. 2004). Additionally, the role of the viral population in the RB mechanism was discovered with, for the first time, nonfixed mutations that were able to explain the RB phenotype. The fact that this phenomenon is not restricted only to the hypervirulent pathotype T9 suggests intrapopulation complementation (i.e., a minor mutated genotype helps to maintain the wild-type genotype in the viral population) (Andino and Domingo 2015). Moreover, preliminary experiments suggest that the mutated clones CIa38and CIa43 are not associated with fitness losses in susceptible plants (O. sativa, variety IR64, and O. glaberrima, accession Tog5673). Resistance sustainability is predicted to decrease when the fitness penalty induced by RB mutations is low in susceptible hosts (Fabre et al. 2009;Harrison 2002;Lecoq et al. 2004).Our data allowed for a complete assessment of the RYMV1 allelic series, generating an overview of the RB prediction efficiency when facing RYMV diversity. The alleles rymv1-3 (Tog5681) and rymv1-5 (Tog5674) exhibited the widest resistance range. This result was expected, particularly when taking into account the nature of the resistance mutations; namely, a deletion of three residues (DRDD 322 to 324) and a combination of a lysine-to-asparagine substitution (K312N) and another short deletion (DLTG 313 to 315). Structurally close, the resistance sustainability of these two alleles was similar. Nevertheless, the relative complexity of rymv1-5 may result in more sustainability. Indeed, experiments in double yeasthybrid assays suggest a lower residual interaction of the wild-type VPg with the mutated central domain of eIF(iso)4G1, mimicking the rymv1-5 allele (Supplementary Fig. S1). In comparison, the rymv1-4 (Tog5438) and rymv1-2 (Gigante) alleles are characterized by the same single substitution, a change from glutamic acid to lysine in very similar molecular environments (at positions 309 and 321, respectively); however, they show very different resistance spectra. The allele rymv1-4 in Tog5438 was the least sustainable of the tested O. glaberrima alleles, and is only efficient toward the East-African isolates (strains S4 to S6 with E49), whereas the allele rymv1-2 in Gigante (O. sativa) is efficient against the strain S2/S3 (with T49) from West Africa (Fig. 2). These differences can be explained by the crucial role of T49, identified as a preadaptation of RYMV to the African rice host, in the ability to overcome the resistance alleles of RYMV1 originating from O. glaberrima. Thus, after gathering the pathogenic data obtained from this study and previous studies (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2007;Traoré et al. 2010), as well as the spatial distribution of the RYMV strains and lineages in Africa (Fargette et al. 2004;Pinel-Galzi et al. 2009;Pinel-Galzi et al. 2015;Traoré et al. 2006a;Trova ˜o et al. 2015), a risk map of RYMV1 resistance breakdown was proposed (Fig. 4). In East Africa, the RB risk appeared to be low globally, with isolates from strains S4 and S5-S6 unable to overcome the RYMV1 resistance from O. glaberrima accessions. In West-Central Africa, the risk level appeared to be very high, with the isolates from the hypervirulent pathotype T9 (lineage S1-ca with T49) able to overcome all of the RYMV1 resistance alleles. Additionally, the isolates from the S1-ac lineage with E49, also distributed in this area, showed an RB ability against Gigante and Tog5438. Finally, the situation in West Africa appeared to be intermediate, with a medium risk on the resistance sources, particularly for Tog5681 and Tog5674.Our risk map was generated based on the results obtained from available resistant accessions, mostly of African rice accessions. However, the O. glaberrima accessions are not usable at a large scale because of their low yield. Their resistance spectra and efficiency should be compared with those of the corresponding near-isogenic lines. Indeed, a host's genetic background can modulate the frequency of resistance breakdown, as has been shown for the pvr2 locus (another translation initiation factor involved in resistance to viruses) (Quenouille et al. 2016). Altogether, our results suggested that the introgression of high resistance genes and alleles into high-yielding O. sativa varieties could be beneficial in the East African region, with a global low risk of resistance breakdown. Concerning West Africa, we found that the isolates from the strain S2-S3 showed a low rymv1-3 RB ability, contrary to previously published data.Because the rymv1-3 (Tog5681) and rymv1-5 (Tog5674) resistance alleles showed similar resistance spectra, we cannot exclude the possibility that the efficiency of the strain S2-S3 in breaking rymv1-5-mediated resistance has been underestimated. The factors involved in this response variability such as viral isolate selection or experimental conditions have not yet been identified and should be investigated more deeply. In our study, we assessed the first step of the viral adaptation to resistant accessions (i.e., the qualitative ability to overcome resistance). Different isolates that are able to overcome Tog7291 (RYMV2) show high or very low frequencies of RB events (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2016). In future studies, measures of variability and frequency should be performed to quantify and predict the RB risks in real conditions. In West-Central Africa, we identified that the hypervirulent pathotype T9 is able to overcome all of the resistance alleles of RYMV1, even the most efficient ones, rymv1-3 and rymv1-5. Isolates of this pathotype are able to infect sources of resistance carrying the RYMV2 and RYMV3 resistance alleles (Pidon et al. 2017;Pinel-Galzi et al. 2016). Preliminary results also suggested resistance breakdown of the Tog5672 accession (carrying both rymv1-4 and RYMV2). The molecular signatures involved in the intrinsic properties of this new pathotype are under investigation. Analyses of the full-length sequences identified an arginine-tolysine mutation at position 22 of the VPg as a candidate. The impact of this polymorphism and its combination with T49 on the RB ability of RYMV has to be tested. The hypervirulent pathotype is more abundant than previously suspected. It has been detected in the neighboring countries Nigeria, Niger, and Togo, and its geographical distribution should be monitored, especially in Benin, Burkina-Faso, Cameroon, and Chad. The dispersal risk of RB genotypes can only be realistically estimated if taking into account the overall dispersal rate of the virus, the corridors of propagation, and the agroecological barriers to transmission, information made recently available for RYMV (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2015;Trova ˜o et al. 2015). A spatiotemporal model for RYMV diffusion has been proposed, with an overall dispersal rate of approximately 15 km/ year (Trova ˜o et al. 2015). Strain circulation between West and West-Central Africa was hindered for a long time by the scarcity of rice cultivation in the \"yam belt\" separating the two regions (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2015). This barrier is now fading with the current intensification of rice cultivation, especially along the Niger and Benue rivers, which is now an efficient corridor of propagation of the virus across the two regions (Trova ˜o et al. 2015). By contrast, the large forests of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with sparse rice cultivation, still constitute an efficient barrier to the spread of RYMV between West-Central and East Africa (Pinel-Galzi et al. 2015;Trova ˜o et al. 2015). Hence, in East Africa, the sustainability of future lines introgressed with RYMV1 alleles from O. glaberrima is unlikely to be threatened by preadapted strains of pathotypes Tor T9 originating in West Africa (strains S1 to S3) or by strains circulating in East Africa, which all belong to pathotype E (strains S4 to S6) (Fig. 2). By contrast, resistance management in West and West-Central Africa is complex, with possible circulation of the RB genotypes. The data obtained here contribute to the anticipation and possible mitigation of the RB risks in West and East Africa. The deployment strategies of resistant lines will be optimized in an attempt to sustain rice resistance by taking into account the adaptability of RYMV strains, their spatial distribution, and their dispersal rate."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1426964373.json b/main/part_2/1426964373.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e321127fffeeb2ded47657304cc317b54f7cd905 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1426964373.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8ae1c22b4cea8e97155f2645730b61e9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/datafile/:persistentId/?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/YLCIS4/OMML7Z","id":"-2059333054"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"adf2fddf-4524-4331-abd9-6bd3830bbbfe","content":"Instructions to interviewer: Ask the respondents if we can interview them for a few minutes. If YES, then obtain informed consent and then proceed with the interview.Hello. My name is _____________________. We are here on behalf of the Alive and Thrive (A&T) and Integrated Family Health Program (IFHP) to have some understanding about the health extension program and the services aimed at improving infant and young child feeding being provided in the health posts.Your kebele has randomly been selected to participate in this study. We will be asking you several questions about the types of services that you provide; maintenance of your health post; your interaction with your supervisor, your interaction with the volunteer community health workers; as well as questions about training you have received. The information you provide us will be used by the RHB and organizations supporting services in your facility, for planning service improvements or further studies of services. The information you share may also be provided to researchers for analyses, however, any reports that use your data will only present information in aggregate form so that neither you nor your facility can be identified. We will also inform you regarding the survey results.You may refuse to answer any question or choose to stop the interview at any time. Do you have any questions about the survey? Do I have your agreement to proceed?If you have any questions or queries regarding this survey, please contact Dr. Disha Ali (0911 466 4601)of International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)/ Alive and Thrive or Prof Yemane Berhane ( 251-114-168207) Here are some of the things that motivate HEWs to do their jobs well. For each of these statements, could you please indicate HOW OFTEN you, personally, have felt this way -ALWAYS, OFTEN, SOMETIMES, RARELY or NEVER.If you feel that a statement here does not apply to your job description, please tell us so.(Interviewer: IF the health staff says this does not apply, CIRCLE \"98\"). "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1429365947.json b/main/part_2/1429365947.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4ea5e09e824061a14e3f595f621d1836a35920d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1429365947.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"21ce9831c68d7e17c4cde1229b4c5b37","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/315be819-77f3-4636-82dd-83febdf8fb52/retrieve","id":"-488936076"},"keywords":["Citizen Science","Data Collection","Community Engagement","Sustainable"],"sieverID":"b8813af8-6907-4a8a-9a90-6eaeea95026d","content":"The Enviro-Champs initiative was developed as a community driven, citizen science initiative in Mpophomeni township in Kwa-Zulu Natal (KZN), South Africa. Over time, the scope of work done and data collected by the Enviro-Champs has expanded. There is now recognition both locally and globally that the Enviro-Champs initiative shows great promise for national and global upscaling. However, several areas within the initiative remain where it could be improved, especially technologically. GroundTruth, in conjunction with technical and funding support from CGIAR Research Initiative on Digital Innovation and the International Water Management Institute (IWMI), engaged in a project which aimed to i) establish recruitment, training, and education tools to support establishment of a technologically integrated and upgraded Enviro-Champs initiative, ii) develop an outline for a training and education workshop for Enviro-Champs once they are hired, iii) improve data collection and reporting capacity and efficiency with a sustainable system (in collaboration with CGIAR and FormShare), and iv) pilot test technological improvements to the Enviro-Champs initiative within the Mpophomeni Enviro-Champs in conjunction with the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), and Umgeni Water. The overarching aim was to develop a technologically innovative and upgraded best-practice framework for the Enviro-Champs, from recruitment, through training and data collection, to data management and reporting. The primary outcome was to have a fully functional, digitally improved Enviro-Champs system in Mpophomeni, that could serve as a working template for upscaling the Enviro-Champs initiative elsewhere in Southern Africa or the world. This report reflects the process and outcomes of this project to date.The Enviro-Champs initiative was developed as a community driven, citizen science initiative in Mpopomeni township in Kwa-Zulu Natal (KZN), South Africa. Initially, this initiative trained community members to monitor and report sewage leaks within the township to assist in municipal management of the water use and waste disposal (Taylor and Taylor 2016). After resounding success, it was upgraded to include training on and implementation of a) data collection and reporting regarding potable water leaks and sewage issues, b) community engagement and awareness building regarding waste and wastewater management, and c) community engagement and emergency response assistance regarding flood preparedness (i.e., a community-driven early warning system for floods), flood risk, and evacuation prior to flooding. This broader scope was expanded to more areas in KZN beside the initial Mpophomeni community and was flagged as a promising 2 initiative for national upscaling and a model which could benefit greatly from technological improvement (Lepheana et al. 2021). To-date, the Enviro-Champs initiative has been successfully implemented in several regions across South Africa (Schachtschneider 2016;Taylor and Taylor 2016;Lepheana et al. 2021).Over time, the Enviro-Champs initiative evolved to introduce some technological aspects to the monitoring and training processes (Lepheana et al. 2021). These included group text messaging platforms to share information (including training information), and data collation in excel (from paper forms submitted on a weekly basis) by a manager. However, several areas remained where the initiative could be improved, throughout its process but especially technologically, including the recruitment and hiring process, the technical capacity of the Enviro-Champs (e.g., technical skills and scope of data capture, reporting, or management actions), the agency of the Enviro-Champs (i.e., accessing real-time information and data outcomes which can empower and inform Enviro-Champ and Community action), and ultimately the relaying of information to agencies (government or nongovernment) that can take action on the information and data gathered by the Enviro-Champs.Enviro-Champs, along with most people globally, even in rural places, generally have access to smartphones. These can be effectively used for data collection, boasting a host of advantages over traditional data collection techniques, including mobility, processing power independent of a power source (as opposed to desktops), connection to the internet, interactive and customisable user interfaces, and all-round accessibility (Hartung et al. 2010;E. A. Graham et al. 2011;Njue et al. 2019). Therefore, smartphones were targeted as an efficient means to improve the quality and quantity of data collection, while simultaneously building digital capacity with the Enviro-Champs. Through collaboration with CGIAR and previous experience collaborating on previous projects, the Open Data Kit (ODK, 2023) (Hartung et al. 2010) data collection mobile application (app) ODK Collect was selected as the ideal candidate to explore in terms of its abilities to meet all the requirements of the data collection side of the Enviro-Champs initiative. The ODK Collect app interfaces with the data capture and management platform FormShare (https://formshare.org), a CGIAR product.ODK is one of the most renowned, globally employed data collection and management services available (Brunette et al. 2013;Ouma et al. 2019). It has been successfully employed in both rural and urban settings, in both on-and offline situations, ranging from tracking tuberculosis (Ali et al. 2016), gathering data on childhood pneumonia (Ginsburg et al. 2016), through to use in farming (Ouma et al. 2019) and utilisation in disaster response (see case studies discussed in Brunette et al. 2013). ODK offers ODK Collect, a mobile app not only suitable for collecting the types of geo-referenced, photographic or text data typically collected by the Enviro-Champs, but capable of far more than previous data collection tools regarding data collection, curation, visualization, management, and reporting (specifically improving automation and reducing manual input and reliance on manual data handling for data management) (Ouma et al. 2019;Hartung et al. 2010;Loola Bokonda et al. 2020). ODK was also initially designed with the goal of providing a data collection and management solution that worked for rural and developing areas (Hartung et al. 2010), therefore building on an ideal ethos and outset mentality for use in citizen science in a developing or rural area as is the case with the Enviro-Champs initiative. Overall, ODK Collect, working in conjunction with Formshare to collate and handle the data, was chosen to implement for the Enviro-Champs initiative.GroundTruth, in conjunction with technical and funding support from CGIAR and IWMI, engaged in a project which aimed to i) establish recruitment, training, and education tools to support establishment of a technologically integrated and upgraded Enviro-Champs initiative, ii) develop an outline for a training and education workshop for Enviro-Champs once they are hired, iii) improve data collection and reporting capacity and efficiency with a sustainable system (in collaboration with CGIAR, ODK, and Formshare), and iv) pilot test technological improvements to the Enviro-Champs initiative within the Mpophomeni Enviro-Champs in conjunction with the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), and Umgeni Water.The overarching aim was to develop a technologically innovated and upgraded best-practice framework for the Enviro-Champs, from recruitment, through training and data collection, to data management and reporting. By working with SANBI and Umgeni Water, who currently fund the Enviro-Champs and gather their data for reporting, testing of technological improvements to data collection and reporting are planned om pilot tests in Mpophomeni.Going forward with technological developments, especially 3 regarding citizen science engagement, it is important to acknowledge the tenets of action-learning, and avoid past failures when implementing technological innovations (Rogers 2002). Issues relating to technical innovations and supposed transfers of technology to communities or other institutional settings are important for all Work Packages (WP) of the CGIAR Initiative on Digital Innovation, or indeed any sphere of work seeking to integrate digital innovation and technology with pre-existing work frames. The literature is littered with failed technology transfer projects, not only in Africa, but world-wide (Rogers 2002;Jalbert and Kinchy 2016;Trouille et al. 2019). In a wide-ranging review of such projects, Rahnema (2020) identifies the underlying technicist assumptions and associated modernist ideology as the key weakness or stumbling block. As early as the 1980s, scientists were warning of this phenomenon, \"There is today an increasing consciousness that our technology has, in enough cases to worry us, out-stripped the ability of many organizations and individuals to make productive use of it\" -Eveland, J. D. (p 303, 1987). With rapid technological innovation and increasing complexity, this concept is even more threatening in the present day. To avoid replicating past failures we suggest that such issues are carefully addressed through throughout work in the arena of digital innovation.The initial aim of this work was to put together a research synthesis on the best practices for community engagement and Enviro-Champ recruitment, including broader education regarding the Enviro-Champ initiative. This initial aim culminated in the research and development of an education and recruitment framework for finding and hiring proficient Enviro-Champs. The framework is based on prior experience and a synthesis of what has thus far defined successful Enviro-Champs, and outlined best practice advice, from a situational analysis through to appointing successful candidates.Building on the experience of establishing the initiative in the Mpophomeni township in Kwa-Zulu Natal (KZN) and in the Palmiet catchment in Durban, KZN, we have refined a 7-step process for selecting and recruiting Enviro-Champs suitable for implementation in the Limpopo and Inkomati basins (See Appendix 1).The second aim was the research and development of a framework for workshops to orientate, educate, and train newly recruited Enviro-Champs. The framework details bestpractice advice on the structure of a workshop that will be best suited to efficient education and training. The framework includes key topics to cover, such as all the duties of data collection, methods for community engagement, environmental awareness and safety, and in-depth training using the multi-media data and information systems associated with data collection and reporting:Several days of training workshops are required, especially considering that Enviro-Champs may have limited formal education and require baseline education and training in ecological principles, as well as the importance of water, sanitation, and hygiene. One option is to offer a training course or programme once a week on a suitable day, or alternatively to hold several days of education and training consecutively. Generally, for the first month or several months, there will be a requirement for follow-up training and education sessions to solidify the lessons learned and data collection protocols. Therefore, it is good to plan ahead accordingly, with particular attention on adaptive management and training in the early stages. The aims of these workshops are the following: 1) Formally welcome and congratulate the new Enviro-Champs on appointment, explaining the necessity and importance of their roles. 2) Facilitate a 'meet-and-greet' between all the Enviro-Champs working in the focal area and the management team. This will enable them to begin developing a support and working network between the each other, and between them and the implementing organization. It is important that all parties are acquainted and acknowledge their roles so as to improve sustainable communication and foster good working relationships. 3) Once the general introductions are completed, the capacity building can commence. In terms of a training methodology, \"The 5 T's of Action Learning\" (UNESCO 2018; Figure 1) has been found to be really useful (O'Donoghue, Taylor, and Venter 2018). Workshops comprise a series of multi-media lectures and interactive working-group discussions covering details on standard operations and data collection related to:a. The \"War on Leaks\", including measuring, reporting and fixing water leaks. b. Pollution monitoring and WTWW effluent compliance monitoring using clarity tubes (Graham et al. 2024). f. Use of the mini Stream Assessment Scoring System (miniSASS) assessment (Graham et al. 2004). Training for this can be done through use of the online miniSASS training course. g. Monitoring total suspended solids (via water clarity) in streams and rivers using clarity tubes (Graham and Taylor 2018).4) For data collection on each of the areas of interest, there should be accompanying demonstrations to explain using data capture software, such as the ODK Collect app on their smartphones, to collect and report data. At the end of the workshop, all Enviro-Champs should have full capacity for all aspects of data collection and reporting. Consequently, it is recommended that ample time is dedicated to training and practice in data collection. Spending time practicing with real examples for every aspect will allow for quick, real-time troubleshooting that is the most expedient way to ensure data are collected Considering it is important for training workshops to include simulated data collection related to each aspect of the work of the Enviro-Champs, it is recommended that the workshops are held in convenient locations in the focal area. This means that the training will happen in a comfortable, familiar location to the trainees (which is conducive to a good learning environment and easy for the trainees logistically), and that infield training can be carried out in the system where the Enviro-Champs will be deployed, maximizing the utility and real-life relevance of the training. One the initial orientation is complete, the Enviro-Champs can be deployed.Following the initial workshops, the skills and capacity of the Enviro-Champs are continually built upon through online feedback and occasional (quarterly at a minimum) follow-up in-person refresher, short workshops, to refine skills and act on adaptive feedback and training needs. After the initial establishment of the Enviro-Champs, their roles can be upgraded as appropriate and possible. For example, the Enviro -Champs can undergo formal basic training in skills useful for their data collection or even on-the-ground action for community improvement. Possible additional training can be offered according to the local needs and requirements. This could include, for example, alien invasive plant clearing, the use of chainsaws, basic plumbing, and first aid.It is important to note that the deployment and training of the Enviro-Champs is an adaptive and reflexive process that is ongoing post the initial training workshops. Feedback, support, and action-learning principles need to be continuously followed to ensure the Enviro-Champs are efficient, supported, well-equipped for their duties, and safe in carrying them out. Some of the potential duties of the Enviro-Champs, such as miniSASS assessments, clarity tube use, and fixing leaks, may require further training sessions over several weeks.Collaboration with CGIAR led to a thorough investigation of the use of ODK Collect as a data collection and management platform (in conjunction with a compatible data management and visualization platform FormShare). Overall, the ODK Collect app, in conjunction with FormShare, were identified as the ideal partners for the Enviro-Champs initiative for efficient, powerful, and customizable, mobile data-light, data collection, storage, and management. Critically, using ODK Collect is available via FormShare, making it accessible and maintained in terms of privacy and security requirements. It also means that the app will be supported on the front and back end by the FormShare developers. Keeping up-to-date with security and privacy requirements, and maintaining a data collection and reporting platform, can be prohibitively difficult if taken on without support from the developers. This can lead to project failure in the long-term, which using ODK Collect will mitigate.The data collection capabilities of ODK Collect include (Hartung et al. 2010;Brunette et al. 2013;Brunette et al. 2017;Ouma et al. 2019), but are not limited to (should more needs arise):• Auto-generated quick response (QR) code that links a unique user profile to a specific project. This streamlines adding app users (in-field Enviro-Champs) to the project, and auto-generates a user profile for each individual which can be customized for access to certain features, including geographic areas or sites, among others.• Customizable data collection forms. Any data that the managers need to be collected can be included in the forms, including precise locations, photos, videos, voice recordings, or virtually any form of quantitative or qualitative form-based information.• Visualizing geographic areas of interest (e.g., Wards) in which to collect data, on mapping software for Enviro-6Champs in-field to navigate by. Assistance navigating to points of interest is also built in;• Collection and real-time submission of geo-referenced image and text data covering all aspects of the data Enviro-Champs are required to gather, including leaks, clarity tube data, miniSASS assessment scores, various sources of pollution, sewer infrastructure damage, alien vegetation, and dump sites;• Collection of more complex geographical data. Global positioning system (GPS) data can be collected in lines or shapes, allowing for submission of more holistic visualizations of potential issues. For example, GPS data could be collected showing the distribution of a stand of alien plants, the path of illegal water connections, or the size of a dump site, rather than simply submitting a single point;• It is possible to collect background data continuously. For example, ODK Collect could be programmed to collect a GPS co-ordinate every ten minutes through a working day to develop a map of movement. This may prove useful, for instance, in visualizing coverage of a Ward or area of interest by Enviro-Champs, and isolating areas not yet or seldom visited that might need increased attention;• Minimizing mobile data use requirements. All data uploaded are G-zipped, minimizing data transfer requirements. It is also possible to predetermine the image quality of any images to be uploaded during submission. For example, images can be compressed to the lowest resolution that serves the data collection needs, and then zipped with all the other data collected, before submission. Ultimately, this process can reduce the data required for a submission by up to 90%, compared to submitting raw, unprocessed data;• Visualizing data collection points. App users can view both all points already submitted;• Data collection using the ODK Collect app can all be done offline, with options for submission either using mobile data when it is available, or solely a Wi-Fi connection when one is available. Powerful, designed offline data collection maximizes the geographic coverage of data collection (by allowing for a full suite of data collection in remote places), and works towards minimizing data costs by affording the opportunity to upload data at convenient times (optimized if data can be uploaded using freely available WIFI where possible, reducing expensive mobile data consumption to zero or close to zero) (Brunette et al. 2017). Importantly, ODK Collect is supported on over 21 000 devices, and has been developed to function in over 60 languages, maximizing accessibility (ODK, 2023: https://getodk.org).A custom ODK Collect form collection interface has been designed and launched for the Enviro-Champs (See Appendix 2 for screen shots of the data collection interface for the Enviro-Champs within ODK Collect), which is available via the FormShare webpage dedicated to the Enviro-Champs (Figure 2).ODK Collect uploads data to a FormShare server, which securely stores the data in a cloud-based format, making the data available online anywhere in the world. Through this process, one can create an end-to-end data management stream: Data are collected in ODK Collect in-field → data are uploaded and securely stored on the FormShare server → those data are auto-assimilated into a managed, live-updated database in FormShare, without the need for tedious manual data handling through transcribing paper-based forms into digital spreadsheets. The data are available for management (review, editing, and cleaning) on the FormShare platform, or they can be easily downloaded in a format suitable for management (i.e., the data are stored and can be downloaded or transferred in a variety of ways, whichever the data manager finds more suitable, e.g., .csv, .json, or .xls). All changes made to data can be logged and can be flagged for later approval or rejection. This allows for data to be updated / edited post collection should there be any errors or changes needed. Moreover, each data point submitted can be easily and quickly reviewed.Switching to ODK Collect and FormShare creates room for improving the Enviro-Champs' technical skill, building the capacity of the Enviro-Champs for collecting and visualizing data, and for processing and managing the data real-time through a primarily automated process. Switching to ODK Collect will also provide a partial (but best-case) solution to the limitations imposed by mobile data requirements for information data handling (e.g., uploading large data files and images). The ODK Collect app is designed for offline use, where the data can be stored and uploaded at a later stage once an appropriate internet connection is available. Therefore, some of the significant issues with internet connectivity in rural areas can be solved by using the ODK platform.Unfortunately, there are currently no sustainable possibilities for 'mobile data free' use of the ODK Collect app (which would remove any constraints Enviro-Champs might have with mobile data restrictions or expenses, which can be significant for people living in rural or disaffected locations). However, to fully overcome the bottleneck in data collection associated with mobile data constraints, UNICEF-South Africa in collaboration with GroundTruth, will explore options to fund mobile data use for data collection via the Youth Agency Marketplace (YOMA). The YOMA platform will ideally allow the entity managing and employing the Enviro-Champs to purchase data packages (via vouchers, which need to be redeemed for mobile data), modulated via blockchain technology, for the Enviro-Champs. This system will allow specific data challenges to be overcome in an efficient, accessible fashion, while minimizing the chance for abuse or dangers associated with direct cash transfers. Work on the applicability and potential of YOMA and blockchain technology in this manner is ongoing.At the introduction to this report we noted that there are challenges and assumptions that must be addressed as digital innovations, such as those relating to the Enviro-Champs and their work with ODK Collect and FormShare, must be understood and engaged with. In particular, issues related to technicism and technicist assumptions can have a marked debilitating effect on efforts to communicate, mobilize and implement such innovations.Research reveals how one can't simply discover the best possible digital innovations, such as the integration with and application of ODK Collect, and then communicate it to the Enviro-Champs, with the assumption that they will effectively apply the technology (Popkewitz 1984;Jalbert and Kinchy 2016;Walker et al. 2020). People and social change processes are much more subtle and unpredictable than this and one needs careful learning pathways that support the application of the innovations if these are to be effectively integrated with the work of the Enviro-Champs and the catchment management processes. This work resonates with Beck's concept of a 'risk society' (1992) an orientation which signals a transition from modernity to reflexive modernization (Giddens 1982). The research also engages with the technicist assumptions that are made in such arenas.As stated by Rogers (2002), \"…technology transfer is essentially a communication process through which the results of scientific research are put into use. As such, technology transfer is a unique type of science communication, one that is often frustratingly difficult. Many technologists believe that advantageous technologies will diffuse spontaneously, so technology transfer activities are unimportant and unnecessary. But this is not the case. For example, when technology transfer occurs too slowly, it is thought to be the fault of the receptors.\"It is important to acknowledge that the receptors are often not at fault. Rather, there is a requirement to engage in actionlearning to facilitate technology transfer, and the onus rests on developers and educators to ensure successful implementation of technological advances (Rahnema 2020). This is especially the case within unskilled, developing, and traditionally technologically limited settings (Walker et al. 2020;Weingart and Meyer 2021).Technicism is a dominating feature of modernist thinking.Technicism comes from a preoccupation with technique and technology, and also has a dominating linear and causal belief structure. Technicism is more than an obsession with technology and 'techno-fix'. It supports a belief structure that sees the world, and how people relate to it, as involving rational processes that can be addressed in a mechanistic manner (Lyotard 1993). Manifesting within modernism and techno-science, technicism has been supported by its research complement scientometrics, a positivistic research style that has dominated the social sciences until quite recently. Interventionist ideologies, especially as these relate to digital innovations, often have a technicist orientation that may be linked to positivistic research perspectives where social change becomes a matter of technical and administrative reform (Popkewitz 1984).For effective social change processes to be achieved, especially as these relate to the digital innovations we are developing with the Enviro-Champs, a close connection with the world-view or the social reality of the Enviro-Champs must be engaged with (Weingart and Meyer 2021;Hulbert 2016;Hulbert et al. 2019;Schachtschneider 2016;Taylor and Taylor 2016). In the Action Learning literature (e.g., O'Donoghue et al. 2018) we recommend 'tuning-in' processes that are crucial to help participants make the connections and engage with the complex social reality that involves water quality monitoring and catchment management. Such 'tuning in' processes also resonate with indigenous knowledge practices and the histories and cultures that have shaped how people live and relate to water and catchment management (UNESCO 2018). These approaches to social change, which are now being adopted by UNESCO, continue to define the further 5 T's of Action Learning, namely Talk, Touch, Tune-In, Think and Take Action.This thinking is not new. The ideology and importance of action-learning, although not so termed, was even reflected on by Xun Kuang, a prolific Chinese Confucian philosopher in 312-230 BC, whose philosophies were collected and published as the Xunzi by Liu Xiang in c 818 AD:\"Not having heard something is not as good as having heard it; having heard it is not as good as having seen it; having seen it is not as good as knowing it; knowing it is not as good as putting it into practice.\"-Chapter 11, Book 8: Ruxiao (\"The Teachings of the Ru\"), in the Xunzi (circa 818 AD), translated by Dubs, H. H. (1928).Step 1. Who to Work With? Situational Analysis and Partner IdentificationAt the outset of attempting to establish an Enviro-Champs initiative, it is crucial to engage with key stakeholders in the region. A situational analysis is a useful strategy because it will establish who all the role players and stakeholders are in a particular area, including Government Departments, Local Government, Non-Government Agencies and Community Based Organizations (CBOs). From the situational analysis, the project team can begin to identify partners suitable for working with the Enviro-Champs. The nature of these potential partners varies; they can range from well-situated, strong church groups, to NGO's such as the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).Step 2. Liaise with Relevant Authorities and PartnersThe next step is to engage with the agencies and communities identified in the situational analysis and partner identification.It is crucial to work with elected Councilors or Ward Representatives, whomever is directed with the charge of environmental regulation and service delivery in the region. There may also be traditional authorities with influence, engaging them, as well as with local municipalities and South African Local Government Association (SALGA) representatives, can be really helpful in ensuring the project is well received and gets the kind of support it needs. Other NGO's and CBO's from the region as identified in Step 1 should also be engaged with to establish whether they may be prepared to help host Enviro-Champs.Step 3. Develop Criteria for SelectionOnce partners have been identified who will take charge of funding and managing the team of Enviro-Champs, selection of Enviro-Champs can begin. The selection process for Enviro -Champs has been partially developed and refined since the inception of the first Enviro-Champs initiative, but never refined and formalized. Our aim was to synthesize a selection process that provides an objective and unbiased method for selecting Enviro-Champs who represent the focal area well, and who will effectively and passionately form environmental and community stewards. The approach for selection of Enviro-Champs, from spatial delineation of the catchment through to outlining the requirements for skills and traits of the selected personnel, and has two parts:The first part of developing the criteria for selection is developing a Decision Support Tool for establishing the geographic location from which the Enviro-Champs will be selected. To begin, a geographic information system (GIS) is used to spatially map and priorities informal settlements to objectively select communities from the Wards which comprise the focal catchment. The GIS mapping and prioritization is done according to the following process:1) The wards, or relevant government district units (hereafter 'Wards' is used), that are within the entire focal area are identified. The relative area of each of these Wards within the entire focal area is calculated.2) The relative area each informal settlement within the focal area, as well as the area of each informal settlement (considering Enviro-Champs initiatives are usually set up in rural areas, or areas with large informal settlementsthe strategy can be adjusted accordingly for local relevance) within the focal area, as mapped by the relevant local municipality, is calculated.3) For initiatives focused on stream and river monitoring, variable buffer scores, extending outwards from the mainstem catchment river/s in graduations (i.e. 100m, 500m, 1.5km, 3.0km) are used to establish the proximity of informal settlements to the river. Informal settlements occurring close to the river would have greater access in terms of ongoing monitoring. A buffer score is applied to each informal settlement where those occurring within 100m of the river are given a high score (buffer score = 4), whereas those occurring beyond 1.5km, but within 3.0km, are given a low score (buffer score = 1). An extent score (small = 1; medium = 2; large = 3) is also applied to the size of informal settlements, based on the assumption that larger communities will have a greater number of potential Enviro-Champs for the selection process. Guidelines for the delineation of these areas are: small (<1ha), medium (1 to 10ha), large (>10ha). Buffer scores (1 to 4) are multiplied by extent scores (1 to 3) to develop values that reflect access to the river and potential number of Enviro-Champs. Overall scores range from zero (0) to eight (8), where a low overall score indicates poor access to the river for a small number of potential Enviro-Champs, while a high score indicates good access by a large number of potential Enviro-Champs. Informal settlements with high scores are selected as suitable commu-Appendix 1. Recruitment Protocol for Enviro-Champs 12 nities for Enviro-Champs training. Within the informal settlements with high scores, there needs to be equal and fair appointment of candidates (focusing on equality in gender appointment and female empowerment). It is recommended (based on the size and coverage of each Ward) that enough Enviro-Champs be appointed to cover the key nodes in the relevant part of the focal area.4) If the focus of the monitoring program is not stream or river monitoring, the same scoring system can be applied to the variables of interest. Essentially, a score can be developed which accounts for the proximity to the variables needing to be monitored or managed, as well as the number of people who have close access to engage in that monitoring and management. Through this process, one can establish what areas should be targeted for recruiting Enviro-Champs, and how many Enviro-Champs would be suitable for that area. It is useful to keep in mind that citizen science achieves heightened efficacy and engagement the easier it is to engage. Therefore, focusing on proximity, ease of access, and minimizing costs, are critical to successful implementation.The second part of developing the criteria for selection is then to define the required and / or desirable qualifications, character, and traits of the potential Enviro-Champs applicants from the selected informal settlements. Within the selected geographic locations, the Enviro-Champs need to meet a set of criteria. Here, we provide a guide for selectors based on previous experience with what has defined successful and effective Enviro-Champs:1) Firstly, an Enviro-Champ should be a public-spirited person who cares about local people and the environment around where they live. Enviro-Champs need to provide linkages between the issues they and their community face, which are often about water, sanitation and waste, and the authorities who are situated to do something about those issues. While Enviro-Champs can be primarily focussed on environmental monitoring and management, they also play an integral role in strengthening social fabric. Enviro-Champs need to be willing environmental and community stewards who can respond when things go wrong, or even when things appear to be going right. Enviro-Champs need to be strong communicators, willing to engage with their community, educating them, congratulating them on what is going right, and challenging them on what is going wrong.2) To be effective the Enviro-Champs must be capable of conducting the following activities:a. Measuring, reporting and in some cases even fixing (if minor) water leaks, both of potable water in supply lines, but also of sewage leaks in the wastewater reticulation network.b. Industrial pollution monitoring and wastewater treatment works (WTWW) monitoring using the transparent clarity tubes (Graham et al. 2024 f. Have Grade 10 as the minimum requirement. This is a guideline, since people without formal educations can still contribute meaningfully to environmental and community stewardship. However, at least a basic education is very helpful for carrying out all the tasks required of an Enviro-Champ, especially in terms of the digital literacy required to capture and report monitoring data.g. Be a South African citizen (for initiatives in South Africa). This can be adjusted as required for the region. The local citizenship is aimed at bolstering local employment and affording opportunities to local nationals in regions characterized by extremely high unemployment and disenfranchisement.5) Interests: Applicants should be passionate about the environment and their community and should have an active interest in outdoor pursuits. Applicants should be committed to public service and to the health and development of the communities in the catchment in which they will be working. e. Determination and persistence. Many issues that Enviro-Champs face are persistent and difficult to remedy over short time scales. Therefore, it is important to persevere and remain proactive and positive in the face of adversity.f. Networking and communication skills. Enviro-Champs are often relied on as conduits of com-munication and networking between communities and local authorities. Consequently, they must show an ability and interest in forming and fostering those connections.g. Team building / capacity building skills.h. An understanding of community and social issues. Enviro-Champs often experience most of the issues they deal with first-hand. However, they need to show concern for their community issues, and a willingness to listen and communicate with community members to understand their grievances.i. An interest in research and data gathering skills.Step 4. AdvertiseAn advertisement for the Enviro-Champ's positions should be shared with the managing and funding partners, for input and editing. It is also a good idea to include local leadership, such as Ward Counsellors and Traditional Leaders, in the process before advertising to ensure that the new role of community members is transparent and welcomed. Following this consultation, the final advert for positions for the Enviro-Champs can be sent out by the key managing and funding partners in the best mechanisms they choose. At this stage, it is important to consider the best methods for reaching the target citizens. In some cases, digital access to conventional platforms may be limited, requiring alternative approaches such as open days in the community advertising the positions, or printing flyers to be distributed within the target communities.Based on the mutually agreed Decision Support Tool and selection criteria, the managing authority are then required to select and review the curricula vitae (CV's) of people who might be suitable and eligible Enviro-Champs. Notably, this step has proven a significant challenge in the past -collecting CV's for the positions can take a long time. Facilitating easy submission of CV's is vital, either via an online means (email or a submission portal), or through facilitating manual submission by providing a time and place, with printing services supplied, where CV's can be submitted. In addition to working through local authorities it is advisable to circulate job description advertisements in communities where the Enviro-Champs will be operating (e.g., pamphlets, educational / recruitment video; https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=VkSm4VDYY_Q) explaining the Enviro-Champs initiative and encouraging people to forward CV's to the appropriate Counsellors for consideration, increasing the uptake from the community side. A shortcoming of other projects has been a 14 low number of potentially suitable candidates to select from. This can potentially be overcome by extending advertising to the communities themselves in an engaging fashion.Step 5: Short-List CandidatesThis step simply requires verifying that the submitted candidates meet the selection criteria. Maximizing the number of CV's submitted increases the chances of having a strong pool of candidates to select from. Where there are enough applications, they can be narrowed down to those best suited to move on to interviews.Step 6: InterviewsOnce short-listing is completed, the remaining candidates are invited to interviews. The number of candidates interviewed will depend on the application pool, resources for interviewing, and the rate of successful appointment. The interview should attempt to establish how well the candidate fits the recommended skills and traits listed in Step 3. The most critical aspect of the interview process is to attempt to establish the participant's commitment to public-spirited or communitydevelopment work. As mentioned above, being an effective Enviro-Champ requires more than someone simply seeking employment and an easy paycheck. They must show genuine desire to be active within their community and to undertake a meaningful role in environmental stewardship. To this end, interviewees are invited to describe any community work they have undertaken, or the visions they may have for activities or practices which could lead to community improvement.Step 7. Appointing Successful CandidatesOnce suitable candidates are selected based on the interview performances, they should be required to undergo two final assessments of their physical health:• Medical screening: Candidates are requested to submit medical screening reports from clinics and doctors. Medical screening includes blood pressure and glucose levels. This is a low resolution, minimally-invasive screening to ensure a suitable level of baseline health. The medical screening can also help to identify potential issues, such as diabetes, that may be treatable before they become serious health risks.• Physical test: To work as an Enviro-Champ requires a certain level of basic fitness. This necessitates a physical test. It is suggested that candidates be invited to a walk of approximately 5 km in the focal area to establish if their fitness levels are adequate for the required work.It should be noted that candidates with disabilities should, nonetheless, be encouraged to apply to be Enviro-Champs. In the past several disabled persons have functioned effectively as Enviro-Champs, although the level and focus of work may need to be adapted to accommodate the skillsets of disabled persons.Once the host partner has established the list of successful candidates, the participants are informed if they were successful or not. The ideal number of candidates eventually appointed will depend on the size of the communities, Wards, and focal area, as well as the number of eligible applicants. The outcome of the Enviro-Champ appointment process is included here for the eThekwini Palmiet catchment Enviro-Champ initiative as an example that can be adapted for future use (Table A1).The process of appointment needs to be adaptive and reflexive. Local issues and challenges may affect the appointment process. Examples from the Palmiet project are noted here to illustrate how challenges could be overcome:• The number of Enviro-Champs selected per settlement was affected by not receiving adequate strong candidates from some settlements. For example, two more Enviro-Champs were added in Quarry Road West, while in Rainbow Ridge the number of Enviro-Champs was reduced by two.• Due to various delays, which were unavoidable and unforeseeable, there remained a need to repeat the selection process for Enviro-Champs positions in Dukezwe and Ezinyosini, where only two were selected instead of five. This illustrates how the process of appointment may be ongoing, until the requirements for Enviro-Champ presence in the catchment are met. Table A1. The number of selected for appointment of Enviro-Champs and the number of Enviro-Champs expected to be, compared to the actual number, eventually appointed in five informal settlements in the Palmiet catchment, Kwa-Zulu Natal"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1446624341.json b/main/part_2/1446624341.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..454d10bcf923d16fcbcb9e7e4693ba2f86533b14 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1446624341.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2e131427a223c3c3560449221534b559","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/7f3a59bf-f633-4119-80b4-072e09bea9c3/content","id":"1019866079"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"05f07534-4d63-4c2a-9e7f-01d04c9e724f","content":"Identify a piece of land on your own farm where you want to start CA -usually about 10% of your holding is sufficient. The small area will enable you to acquire enough ground cover, prepare the land on time, seed when the first effective rains occur, and learn to effectively manage and control weeds. Learning to manage crop production challenges in a small field is always easier than in a large one. Clear the land of trees and shrubs. Make sure the field is weed free and there is enough surface cover from residues or imported biomass. If there are not enough maize residues available it is advisable in the first year(s) to use thatching grass, leaf litter or other organic material to improve ground cover. Depending on the seeding systems (manual or animal traction), it is necessary to prepare the land beforehand. Basins are normally dug during the dry season to spread the labour required for digging throughout the winter period. This will ensure that the basins are ready for planting at the onset of rains. Jab-planting, rip-line and direct seeding can be done at seeding time; however it is important to make sure that the equipment is in good working order and ready for use on-site.Sufficient fertilization is necessary for good crop production. If your soils are very sandy, an additional dose of nitrogen fertilizer, manure or compost might be necessary to get good yields (harvest produce and biomass). After crop emergence, make sure that you gap-fill by sowing more seed wherever the crop has not germinated. Keep the field weed free as much as possible although this might require extra weeding. Fertilize the crop with sufficient nitrogen fertilizers as topdressing (AN or urea) to ensure that the crop is always wellnourished.Harvest the crop at physiological maturity and keep the crop residues on your field for the next season's crops.Plan a good crop rotation from the beginning to improve the nutrient status of your soil and to reduce the incidence of pests and diseases. Sow the crop after the first effective rains. There are regional differences but rainfall events greater than 30mm after the 15th of November will normally mark the start of the rainy season.Photo: Walter MupangwaWhat limitations have to be overcome before starting?Previous management problems such as soil compaction and surface unevenness need to be corrected at the end of the previous season. If the soil is acidic, a blanket application of lime at 500-1000 kg/ha in the rip-lines or planting basins is beneficial. Perennial weeds need to be controlled with herbicides or by careful manual weeding. It is important to aim at a weed free field throughout the year and to weed before the weeds are 10cm tall or 10cm in circumference.Good crop production needs precision for success and yields tend to be poor if crops are not managed well. Precision becomes even more important in CA as many of its benefits depend on timeliness and accuracy. During preparation all necessary inputs need to be acquired (seeding equipment, seed, fertilizers, herbicides, etc.) so that everything is at the farm before the rains start.. Experimenting with CA on your own fields can sometimes lead to unexpected management problems. The most common challenges in the initial seasons are: weed control difficulties in retaining enough crop residues calibration of equipment acquiring fertilizer and fertilizing at the right rates correct plant stand and adequate germination, and pest and diseases The best way to overcome these challenges is to talk to experienced farmers in the area, and consult with the extension officer who will help you to solve and overcome your problems. Some farmers are easily discouraged during the first season because they cannot see immediate benefits and returns to their investment. However, the first season in many aspects is a learning season and all farmers who try CA on their own fields need to be prepared for this in advance. It is therefore important to start on a small piece of land to be able to manage the plot in an optimal and timely manner and so reduce the risk of failure and discouragement. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1459478346.json b/main/part_2/1459478346.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..804198d4209df6cbc0a1c723c13ab5de82c65463 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1459478346.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6cdcf9ad48e93dd5b9b7a8536280ad76","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/38803826-e59b-43a9-888d-d2169ac5a6b7/retrieve","id":"1702359376"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d95d3367-8d61-434f-8638-ee6217b0eec7","content":"Salmonella is pathogen of many mammalian species and it is one of the most important bacteria that cause food borne illness worldwide. Salmonella spp. can be commonly found in raw poultry and meat. Eggs, agricultural products, processed foods, raw milk and raw milk products and contaminated water also have been implicated in human salmonellosis. In Thailand, Salmonella was found to be the second largest cause of food poisoning, following rotavirus. Furthermore, antimicrobial-resistant strains of Salmonella spp. has been reported in many parts of the world. The importance of the resistance is that the bacteria acquire their resistance in the animal host before being transmitted to human through food chain. This may result treatment failures in human when applying antimicrobial agents to treat human salmonellosis. This study aimed to elucidateFirst, the author would like to express my deepest sincere and appreciation to my advisory., Assoc. Prof. Dr. Suvichai Rojanastein from the Department of Food Animal, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, for his guidance, encouragement and support in every facet in the study.I would like to grateful thank to my co-advisor, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Prapas Patchanee, from the Department of Food Animal, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, for his comments and suggestions in writing up the manuscripts for publication, Prof. Dr. Manat Suwan from Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University for his comments and suggestions in writing up thesis proposal and technical supports. Finally, I would like to give my special thanks to my family and my friends for their loving understanding and warm friendship.the status of small scale poultry slaughterhouses and their affect to ecological and health in the community in order to sustainably enhance hygiene and functioning of small scale poultry slaughterhouses in Northern Thailand. Initial steps included the identification of key stakeholders associated with the meat production chain, development of a research framework, and design of a methodology based on stakeholder consultations. The framework and methodology combine issues in five major areas: (1) public health, (2) socioeconomics, (3) policy, (4) veterinary medicine, and (5) communities and the environment. Consequently, a total of 41 small-scale poultry slaughterhouses were visited during the period from July 2011 to May 2012. Data on the current status of the slaughterhouses regarding productivity, economic status, hygienic management, and opportunities and challenges faced in improving the plants and following the DLD slaughterhouse regulations, were collected using a structured questionnaire and interviews. In addition, a checklist, which was developed based on the DLD regulations, was used for triangulation. In addition, a microbiological risk assessment approach was employed to detect Salmonella contamination in meat processing facilities. The microbial risk assessment was combined with stakeholder perceptions to provide an overview of the existing situation, as well as to identify opportunities for upgrading slaughterhouses in order to more effectively address matters of food safety, processing, and government licensing.The results of this study demonstrated that the developed conceptual framework could elucidate the complex factors limiting small-scale slaughterhouse improvement including a lack of appropriate enabling policies and an apparent absence of feasible interventions for improvement. Unhygienic slaughterhouse management was reflected in the incidence of Salmonella contamination. The prevalence of Salmonella spp. in live poultry, carcasses, waste water, and soil around processing plants were 3.17%, 7.32%, 21.27% and 29.27%, respectively. Moreover, the bacteria could be isolated from each point of slaughter lines. Eighteen different serotypes were identified, the most common being Corvallis (15.19%), followed by Rissen (13.92%), Hadar (12.66%), Enteritidis (10.13%), [I. 4,5,12 : i : -], Stanley, and Weltevreden (8.86%). Tests revealed that 68.35% of the Salmonella spp. were resistant to at least one antimicrobial while 50.63% showed multiple drug resistance (MDR). Specifically, 44.30% of Salmonella was resistant to nalidixic acid, followed by streptomycin (41.77%), ampicillin (34.18%), tetracycline (34.18%), and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (20.25%).Policy advocacy was implemented through meeting with policy-level DLD officer responsible for slaughterhouse control in Thailand. The instruction including blueprint and feasible criteria of good practice of small scale poultry slaughterhouse was developed and then tested of microbiological quality of the meat. The results showed that Coliform bacteria and total bacteria count in meat after implementation was lower than that before implementation. It could be concluded that there is potential for the use of an Ecohealth approach to address critical problems and it's solving at the interface of rural development and public health. The findings of this study could serve as a model for transdisciplinary studies and interventions related to other similar complex challenges. Early in 2004, the highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 (HPAI H5N1) has emerged in many countries in Asia including Vietnam, Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Republic of Korea, and Thailand (1). In order to control the disease, the governments of each country initiated many programs for the control, eradication and establishment of a national campaign and control measures to contain and prevent avian influenza from spreading by following OIE guidelines. Result from combating with HPAI was a massive slaughter of many millions poultry. Unfortunately, there still have been reports of HPAI in many countries such as Cambodia, Vietnam and Indonesia. However, the disease triggered the awareness of zoonotic diseases in the region including food borne diseases.Salmonella is pathogen of many mammalian species and it is one of the most important bacteria that cause food borne illness worldwide. Salmonella spp. can be commonly found in raw poultry and meat (2). Eggs, agricultural products, processed foods, raw milk and raw milk products and contaminated water also have been implicated in human salmonellosis. In European Union (EU), approximately 100,000 human cases were registered each year (3). In the United stated, 2 million human cases are reported annually.The disease causes enormous economic impact. There is report on estimated the cost for the disease in the United States and reported that the cost for the disease was USD 3.3 million annually for medical care and lost productivity (4). The disease is not only recognized as an economic loss, but it is considered as a public health concerns in terms of drug resistance.Antimicrobial-resistant strains of Salmonella spp. has been reported in many parts of the world. The prevalence of resistant isolates in intensive animal production countries is between 10-30% and when focusing strains isolated from the food-producing animals that are held under intensive use of antimicrobial in animal production the prevalence might up to 60-90%. The importance of resistance to antimicrobial agents of Salmonella spp. originated from animal is that the bacteria acquire their resistance in the animal host before being transmitted to human through food chain (5,6) It is able to lead treatment failure when treatment human salmonellosis with antimicrobial agents.Some reports indicated that poultry processing at the slaughterhouse might be the potential source of Salmonella contamination in meat. Rasschaert et al. reported that the improper slaughtering processes could higher bacterial contamination in meat (7).Padungtod and Kanenee studied the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in chicken at the farms and at the slaughterhouses in Northern Thailand and reported that the prevalence were 4% and 9% respectively (8). It could be noted that the slaughterhouses play important role of the source of Salmonella contamination in meat.In Thailand, there are not many reports of Salmonella contamination in poultry meat in poultry slaughterhouses. The associated research regarding disease control and prevention was reported by Rojanasthien et al. that most of poultry slaughterhouses in northern Thailand were small scale (9). They also reported that the slaughterhouse owners lack the knowledge concerning the sanitation and disease control. Therefore, the sanitation and hygienic practices management ware poor and it need to be improved.EcoHealth is an emerging field of study focusing how changes in the ecosystems affect human health. It has many disciplines. EcoHealth examines changes in the biological, physical, social and economic environments and relates these changes to human health. EcoHealth study differs from traditional study, single discipline studies. The researcher identifies the problems and seeks solutions for those problems. The result is that sometimes the direction for solving a problem does not actually result in a solution when it is implemented due to a lack of participation on the part of the group affected by the problem. Meanwhile, an Ecohealth study uses a different approach. It brings the multiple specialist disciplines together with members of the affected community since the study begins. This approach could lead to creative and novel approaches and can lead to a strong social solution.Because there are many disciplines involving to operating a small scale poultry slaughterhouse including veterinary sciences, public health, social, economics, and environment. Therefore, how to improve the disease control and hygienic management in the small scale poultry slaughterhouses are multifaceted. These disciplines are needed to include to the study. with an optimal pH between 7 and 7.5 (10).The Salmonella serovars can be divided into 3 groups based on their association with particular host populations. Salmonella serotypes which are almost exclusively associated with one particular host species are called the host-restricted serotypes (e.g.human Salmonella Typhi and poultry Salmonella Pullorum). Serotypes which are prevalent in one particular host species but can cause disease in other host species are the hostadapted serotypes (e.g. Salmonella Dublin causes disease in cattle but can also infrequently cause disease in other mammalian hosts). The last group of serotypes are the unrestricted or broad-host-range serotypes, capable of inducing disease in a broad range of unrelated host species (e.g. Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis) (11).Salmonella Typhi is the cause of typhoid fever with symptoms, such as sustained fever, headache, malaise, abdominal pain, and enlargement of the liver and spleen and systemic infections. It is transmitted by ingestion of food or water contaminated with feces from an infected person. Therefore, typhoid fever is a problem in parts of the world with poor sanitation practices (10).Other Salmonella serotypes are non-typhoid and cause less severe symptoms in humans. Symptoms of gastroenteritis occur between a few hours and five days following ingestion of the pathogen. The symptoms are diarrhea, abdominal pain, headache, nausea, mild fever and sometimes vomiting. The diarrhea is non-bloody and varies from a few, thin stools to massive evacuation with accompanying dehydration. The disease is usually selflimiting and recovery occurs after a few days to a week. In some rare cases, the infection is followed by more serious complications especially in immunocompromised people, pregnant women, elderly and children. Approximately 5% of individuals with gastrointestinal illness caused by non-typhoidal Salmonella will develop bacteremia which is often accompanied with focal infections such as meningitis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, pneumonia and arteritis (12). According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the US, 0.04% of the estimated number of non-typhoidal Salmonella cases has a lethal outcome (13,14).Salmonella can grow in the presence or absence of air. The growth rate on beef muscle stored at 20 o C under nitrogen is only slightly less than that obtained when stored under air. At high concentrations of CO 2 (50-60%), growth is strongly inhibited on crab meat, beef steak and ground beef at a temperature of 10 to 11 o C, but at 20 0 C there is little inhibition (15).Salmonella can survive for 28 days on the surfaces of vegetables under refrigeration. Some foods, including meat, appear to be protective of Salmonella during freezing and frozen storage (16). AIFST reported that rapid freezing promotes survival and that lower storage temperature and less fluctuation in temperature give greater survival (15). Storage temperatures near the freezing point result in most death or injury. In chicken breast meat (pH 5.8), 60-83% of Salmonella cells survived storage at -20 ºC for 126 days, whereas at -2 ºC and -5 ºC only 1.3% to 5.8% were still viable after 5 days.Many and S. Paratyphi B, they concluded that the foods were significant as a vehicle for human salmonellosis (18). They also studied the contamination of Salmonella in chicken meat production and reported that the prevalence of Salmonella contamination in retail chicken meat, chicken meat from slaughterhouses, and chicken feces samples were 28%, 4.5%, and 6.6% respectively and the major serovar was S. Enteritidis (19). Moreover, report from Hanson et al. showed the prevalence of Salmonella in pig and chicken varied from 2-25% (20). Padungtod and Kanenee also study the prevalence of Salmonella in food animal in Northern Thailand and they reported that the prevalence of Salmonella in chickens at the farm, slaughterhouse and chicken meat at the market were 4%, 9% and 57%, respectively (8). From the previous studies, it might reflex that the slaughterhouse play important role in Salmonella contamination in meat products.Salmonella is well known as one of the most common organisms causing infections diarrheal diseases worldwide. infections are foodborne (14). In the Netherlands, eggs and poultry meat are responsible for 39% and 21% of human salmonellosis cases, respectively, whereas human salmonellosis is caused by pork in 25% of the cases and by beef in about10% of the cases (22). Eggs are the most important source of salmonellosis, especially in outbreaks where the serotype Enteritidis is involved (23)(24)(25)(26). Poultry meat also contributes to the transmission of Salmonella to humans.It was shown in a study of the US that eating chicken outside of the home was the only significant risk factor for sporadic Salmonella Enteritidis infections. In Spain, there was a Salmonella outbreak with more than 2,000 cases due to consumption of pre-cooked chicken (27).Antimicrobial-resistant strains of Salmonella spp. are now widespread all over the world and are causing great concern due to the spread of multi-drug-resistant strains. In developed countries it is becoming more accepted that a majority of resistant strains are of zoonotic origin and have acquired their resistance in an animal host before being transmitted to humans through the food chain (5,28).In animal production, antimicrobial drugs are used for therapy, prophylaxis, and growth promotion. The use of such drugs causes a selective pressure to be imposed on bacterial populations and antimicrobial resistances are selected. The pool of resistance genes is thus spread in the environment (29). Antibiotic resistance determinants are usually encoded on plasmids but can also be presented on the Salmonella chromosome. Resistance can be achieved through mutations and acquisition of resistance encoding genes. Cointegrates of resistance and virulence plasmids in Salmonella have been observed. This means that antibiotic pressure may select for these plasmids and that both resistance and virulence traits are obtained simultaneously. This may lead to more antibiotic-resistant and virulent Salmonella strains (30). Data suggesting that disease caused by resistant strains can be more severe than disease caused by susceptible strains have been published (31)(32)(33). The prevalence of resistant isolates in different countries where intensive animal production are 10 -30%. When concentrating on strains isolated from food-producing animals that are held under strong antibiotic selective pressures the prevalence of resistant strains can be very high, up to 60-90% (34). In the year 1999, total of 8,508 Salmonella isolates of animal origin were tested against 17 antimicrobial drugs in the USA. The results indicated that many Salmonella serotypes were resistant to some of the antibiotics commonly used in human and animal health and as growth promoters in the animal production industry (35,36) In 2004 in the EU, human isolates of the two dominating serotypes, SalmonellaTyphimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, showed a considerable variation in the prevalence of resistant isolates between reporting countries. For Salmonella Enteritidis the prevalence of resistant isolates was generally low but for Salmonella Typhimurium resistance to commonly used antimicrobials was high in some countries. Salmonella Typhimurium strains resistant to 2 or more antimicrobials varied from7.8 to 56.4%. In the Netherlands 21% of human isolates of Salmonella Typhimurium were resistant to more than 4 antimicrobials. In broiler meat the prevalence of resistant isolates of Salmonella spp. also showed great variation with a relatively high level of resistance to several antimicrobials reported from some countries. The percentage of strains resistant to 4 or more of the 11 tested antimicrobials varied between 0 and 36% among reporting countries (17).There have been reports indicating Salmonella contaminations in meat at the slaughterhouses. during transportation to the slaughterhouse, and a ≥4-h waiting period in shipping crates before slaughtering (41). Moreover, the effect of processing on Salmonella contamination on chicken carcasses was determined and reported by Cardinale et al. that using scalding water for plucking increased the risk of contamination (42). Food Standards Australia New Zealand (17) concluded the effect of the processing on the Salmonella contamination which is showed in table 2. slaughterhouses which are commonly found in Thailand. There is the report in Malaysia that the contamination rates of food-borne pathogen (Campylobacter spp.) in traditional slaughterhouses were intensely higher than modern slaughterhouses (43). Therefore, the risk factors of Salmonella contamination in chicken meat processed from small scale poultry slaughterhouses, which are traditional slaughterhouses, should be studied.According to the report by Department of Livestock Development, Thailand has 2,380 poultry slaughterhouses. Only 119 plants (5%) have the license for operating the plant (44). It could reflex that most of the slaughterhouses do not address the standard slaughterhouse certification. Since food safety is the policy of Thailand, DLD has policy to encourage all poultry slaughterhouses in Thailand to meet the standard regulation (45).However, the main problem is that most of those slaughterhouses are small scale and the owners could not invest to improve their plants because lack of investment funds (46).The definition of Ecohealth is given by Waltner-Toews that \"Ecohealth can be defined as systemic, participatory approaches to understanding and promoting health and well-being in the context of social and ecological interaction\" (47). It is the study of changes in the biological, physical, social, and economic environment and of the relations of these changes to human health. Ecohealth addresses the links between human health, animal health, and the environmental health including social, cultural, and economic factors. This is a change from the traditional approach, where research is conducted by experts from within the single discipline. Ecohealth strives to overcome the traditional compartmentalized thinking by promoting transdisciplinary research. The Ecohealth approach integrates different type of knowledge to develop strategies for improving the health of humans, animal, and other associated disciplines. The concept of Ecohealth approach is showed in the figure 1. It is difficult to indicate the exact time and place where Ecohealth concept was first launched. Hanlon staged regarding the terms related with Ecohealth that, \"The human ecologic approach, of necessary and by definition, calls for an interdisciplinary effort wherein the natural, physical, and social sciences, in company with engineering, combine to study the adaptive response of man and specially the effect of unsuccessful adaptation of his health\" (49). He also stated for calling on action that \"we must call for man and woman with the foresight and courage to accept the new and broader philosophic base of human ecology, as applied to human welfare, and , on accepting it, it act upon it. Only then may we as a profession make our true potential contribution to the development of a new society and a better world.\" These states are parallel with Schwabe's statement that \"the critical need of man includes the combating the disease, ensuring enough food, adequate environmental quality, and a society in with humane value prevail\" (50). Furthermore, he stated that \"between human and animal medicine there is no dividing lines-nor should that be\". It could be concluded that integrative approach among the disciplines is an effective means to use in the study in order to improve the health.The term Ecohealth has been adopted recently and widely used by several organizations. The major organization who use the terms Ecohealth is International Development Research Center (IDRC). This organization also hosted the international Ecohealth conference. The first conference was held at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, in the USA in 2006 and then the event has been set up every two years.The principle of Ecohealth is descripted by Charon (51) that there are 5 main principles including system thinking, transdisciplinary, participation, sustainability, equity, and knowledge to action. Since the Ecohealth research is difficult to do because it relies on imperial approaches and flexible. The set of principle is only the guideline for the research \"how to\" conduct the Ecohealth research. The briefly explanation of these principles is showed in the table 3. With traditional research methods, the researcher identifies the problems and seeks solutions for those problems. The result is that sometimes the direction for solving a problem does not actually result in a solution when it is implemented due to a lack of participation on the part of the group affected by the problem. In using the Ecohealth The hypothesis of the study is \"systemic approach shall improve and sustain the slaughterhouses more hygienic and viable\".This study was conducted during March 2011 -September 2014. The Ecohealth concept was used as a guideline for this study, including system thinking, transdisciplinary, participation, sustainability, equity, and knowledge to action. The stakeholders regarding the slaughterhouses were identified and participated in the beginning.The food safety policies, standard poultry slaughterhouse law, regulation, and the implementation were systemically reviewed.The hygienic status of the small scale poultry slaughterhouses was determined as well as Salmonella contamination in meat, slaughter line, and the environment. The socioeconomic situation of those slaughterhouses were also investigated. The results were used to explore for the reason that why the small scale slaughterhouse owners could not address the standard regulation. The research findings were advocated to the policy-level officers of the Department of Livestock Development (DLD). The feasible guideline for slaughterhouse improvement in order to address the standard poultry slaughterhouse regulations were developed and then pilot tested.Chiang Mai province is located in the northern part of Thailand and is characterized as having dense areas of poultry production. In 2010, more than three million chickens were produced in this province (52). Furthermore, according to data from Rojanasthien et al. (9), the most slaughterhouses in Northern Thailand were located in Chiang Mai, therefore, the study were conducted in Chiang Mai province. Ecohealth concept was used as a guideline for this study, including transdisciplinary and participatory approach. Therefore, the stakeholders were identified and participated from the beginning of the study. Since food safety, especially in rural areas of Thailand, is a complex challenge and involves many sectors, an integrated approach was applied in this study. The main stakeholders were identified in the early stages of the project, using participatory methods, for instance, researchers meeting with key stakeholders, including slaughterhouse owners, as well as DLD officers at the national and regional levels, to identify problems. The information obtained from discussions with stakeholders was then reviewed by experts in veterinary science, socioeconomic, and public health before being used as the basis for developing a conceptual framework 6. Review of policies, law, and regulation regarding poultry slaughterhouse control inPolicies, laws, and regulations which include the key phrases \"food safety,\" \"slaughterhouse standards,\" \"current situation of poultry slaughterhouses,\" or \"foodborne diseases in Thailand\" were collected from published and unpublished sources, including the Royal Thai Government Gazette, the Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan of Thailand (2012-3016) (53), the DLD strategic plan (54), as well as domestic and international research reports on poultry slaughterhouses.Perceptions regarding the implementation of existing regulations were obtained through focus group discussions (FGDs) with DLD regional officers. The principle investigator and co-principle investigator led the FGDs. Purposive sampling was used to identify participants using the criteria: (1) DLD provincial officers; (2) heads of DLD district offices; and (3) individuals having responsibility for slaughterhouse control. TwoFGDs were conducted with a total of 22 participants between May and June 2012.A total of 41 small-scale poultry slaughterhouses were visited during the period from July 2011 to May 2012. Data on the current status of the slaughterhouses, especially data regarding productivity, economic status, hygienic management, and opportunities and challenges faced in improving the plants and following the DLD slaughterhouse regulations, were collected using a structured questionnaire and interviews. In addition, a checklist, which was developed based on the DLD regulations, was used for triangulation.A preliminary survey found that, in 2010, Chiang Mai had 55 small-scale poultry slaughterhouses with approximately 25,000 poultry being sent to these slaughterhouses each day. Samples were collected from slaughterhouses located within 100 kilometres of the laboratory at Chiang Mai University to ensure that samples could arrive the laboratory center within three hours. A total of 410 meat samples from 41 slaughterhouses were collected. Each carcass was placed in a large bag with 250 ml of sterile peptone water, which was then shaken inside the bag for one minute, the rinse water was then poured into a sterile bottle and used for identification of Salmonella spp. In addition, samples were also collected from each point of slaughter line and environment (table 6). The total of number of samples for each slaughterhouse was shown in table 6. The data from structured questionnaire and checklist was coded and recorded.Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data by the application of Microsoft Excel 2010 program (Microsoft Corp.). To describe the slaughterhouse status, the combination of the data from questionnaire, observation, and checklist was done and these results were compared with the criteria of the slaughterhouse regulations.The prevalence of Salmonella contamination in carcasses, each point of slaughter line, soil, and wastewater was calculated by dividing the number of samples positive for Salmonella by the total number of samples processed.To advocate the findings to policy, the meeting with policy-level DLD officers was set up. The knowledge translation and brainstorm were implemented in order to develop the guideline encouraging the hygienic improvement of the small scale slaughterhouse to address food safety and to achieve a license.The cost-effective blueprint of the small scale slaughterhouse and the minimum requirement of the improvement criteria was developed and then pilot test was implemented to developed model of good practice small scale slaughterhouse. To evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation, meat samples were collected before and after implementation for testing of Coliform bacteria and total bacteria count in meat.Over the last 30 years, several successful attempts have been made to control various infectious diseases in countries all over the world, especially in developed nations.However, threats still exist, such as antimicrobial resistant bacteria and unsafe farming and food production practices, as well as threats created by the impact of urbanization and agricultural intensification (57). In addition, traditional methods of controlling infectious diseases using conventional biomedical strategies have often failed, resulting in the emergence and outbreak of diseases such as SARS, H5N1 and H7N1 avian influenza, malaria, tuberculosis (58). In order to address these challenges and to achieve improvements in overall health-not just human health-the crucial roles of social, economic, and cultural factors must also be considered. Thus, it is imperative that nonmedical sciences be involved in the process of developing disease control strategies.In this study, the main stakeholders were the slaughterhouse owners, DLD officers at the national and regional levels, regional public health officers, and local administration officers. Brainstorming meetings and interviews confirmed the stakeholders' views on the importance of food safety and food policies in Thailand. They realized that poultry slaughterhouses are an important link in the poultry meat production chain, that the standard regulations should be followed, and that there are many factors affecting the improvement of slaughterhouses. They concurred that the main problems to be addressed are the inability of most small-scale slaughterhouses to comply with the current standard regulations and a lack of appropriate strategies to motivate and assist small-scale slaughterhouses to comply with these regulations.The conceptual framework of this study (Figure 4) reveals the complex interactions related to achieving slaughterhouse improvements. For example, there are three main government agencies responsible for the control of slaughterhouses: (1) the DLD, which is primarily responsible for animal health and disease control on livestock farms plus improvement and updating of regulations governing slaughterhouses; (2) The Ministry of Public Health, which is responsible for setting food safety standards for meat products; and(3) Local administrative organizations, which are responsible for giving permission to slaughter animals and to distribute meat, as well as appointing meat inspectors. To effectively assist slaughterhouse owners to improve their slaughterhouses and to follow regulations, government officers from these agencies must work together in an integrative model.To more effectively identify avenues for enhancing safe processing in small-scale poultry slaughterhouses, practitioners of veterinary and human medicine, social scientists, and economists cooperatively followed an integrative approach in the development of the conceptual framework and in participatory problem identification from the outset. That framework demonstrates the complexity of the problem and the linkages between the different disciplines. This study follows the successful integrative approach which was used to gain an understanding of and develop a suitable research agenda in the case of the emergence of leptospirosis in Hawaii (59). This study evidences the importance of a transdisciplinary approach, as well as methods of implementing that approach as described and demonstrated by Pokras and Kneeland in their development of educational and policy initiatives to control the lead poisoning problem in wildlife, humans, and domestic animals (60).The framework also includes socioeconomic factors affecting the improvement of slaughterhouses, for example, the association of education level and age with perceptions of food safety, as well as issues of income from slaughterhouses, living expenses, and family debt that could affect opportunities for investment in slaughterhouse improvements. (1) the location of the slaughterhouse, e.g., slaughterhouses must be situated far away from communities); ( 2) the area and structure of the slaughterhouse buildings, e.g., the slaughtering process must be conducted in a concrete building and there must be a fence around the slaughterhouse; (3) local infrastructure and the area inside of the slaughterhouse, e.g., the area inside the slaughterhouse building must be appropriate for operations, easy to clean, and include separate clean and dirty zones; (4) equipment and facilities management, e.g., facilities used in the slaughtering process must be easy to clean; (5) holding pens, e.g., pens where birds are maintained for 8-10 hours before slaughter must be constructed of concrete and must prevent pathogens contamination of the slaughtering process; (6) waste management systems; and (7) hygiene management, e.g., cleaning the slaughterhouse every day after operation. To be licensed by the DLD, all slaughterhouses in Thailand must comply with this regulation.In addition, good manufacturing practices (GMPs) for poultry slaughterhouses were announced, and their adoption has been mandatory since 2006. However, in practice, the GMP guidelines, which were intended to further improve operations including hygiene standards, have been enforced only in slaughterhouses which have been issued a government license, most of which are larger operations.In the FGDs with DLD regional officers (provincial and district) on the implementation of laws and regulations, the officers accepted that they could not strictly enforce the ministerial regulatory criteria intended to promote the improvement of smallscale slaughterhouses. They acknowledged that the criteria are intensive and require high levels of investment, making them suitable for large-and medium-scale operations which generate sufficient profit, but not for small-scale facilities with low productivity and small profits. They agreed that if they attempted to strictly enforce the regulations, they would meet resistance from the slaughterhouse owners. They also acknowledged that during their regular visits to slaughterhouses every three to four months, they should focus on establishing a spirit of collaboration and cooperation in order to promote hygienic management and disease control in slaughterhouses rather than strictly enforce the regulations. They also indicated that the current regulations should be more flexible and practical. As one officer said, \"It would be useful if there was a prototype or a blueprint of a good, hygienically managed slaughterhouse that owners could use as a model for investment\". The majority of the participants agreed with this comment.Department of Livestock Development regional officers agreed that the current laws and regulations are, in fact, more suitable for large-and medium-scale operations which can afford the necessary high investment. Nonetheless, the DLD is attempting to encourage even small-scale poultry slaughterhouses to meet the standard. The slaughterhouse blueprint developed by the DLD and distributed to officers and slaughterhouse owners, however, is designed for operations processing 200-300 birds/day which is four or more times the daily production of small-scale slaughterhouses. Thus, the DLD-proposed blueprint poses a considerable challenge to small-scale slaughterhouses.DLD officers indicated an awareness of the need to work integrative with officers from other agencies, including public health officers and local administrative officers, in order to improve food safety. However, they mentioned that there were obstacles to such joint efforts. For example, working with local administrative organizations was problematical because those organizations still had no official role in that area or any personnel specifically responsible for slaughterhouse control. In the case of Public Health agencies' work with food safety control, their main focus is on meat products sold in the market rather than conditions at slaughterhouses. On a positive note, just over half the participants (54.5%) indicated that they were willing to work in an integrative manner with other agencies to address issues of food safety. Table 7 summarizes the reflections of the participants regarding the themes of the FGDs. The zoonotic diseases and food safety perception of the slaughterhouse owners was determined. The results showed that there was the only high perception only on the possible transmission of the diseases from sick birds. Contrary, perception on important statement such as cleaning measures and zoonotic knowledge were low. This result might causing as improper hygienic practices were commonly observed in majority of the slaughterhouse.Table 9 shows the perception of zoonotic diseases and food safety of slaughterhouse owners Data from interview regarding slaughterhouse owners' perceptions of relevant laws and regulations, 33 out of 41 owners (80.5%) stated that some of the criteria in the current standard regulation were impractical for small-scale slaughterhouses. For example, meat from most of the smaller slaughterhouses was not inspected because the limited slaughterhouse income was not sufficient to hire a meat inspector. Owners stated that they would have to stop operating their business if the DLD strictly enforced all the standard slaughterhouse regulation requirements. Although 25 out of 41 owners (61%) accepted that they did need to improve their slaughterhouses, they indicated a desire that the regulatory criteria be more practical. The process of slaughtering was carried out in open-air buildings as follows: the birds were killed with a sharp knife, and the carcasses were scalded in a water tank at a temperature of 50-70°C for 2-3 minutes. De-feathering was done using semi-automatic defeathering machines. The carcasses were cleaned by dipping them in a bucket of water.Evisceration was done by hand, using a knife to cut open the carcasses; this process was carried out on chopping blocks placed on the floor. The carcasses were then dipped in hot water (50-70°C) to firm up the skin, then stored in a small vessel containing ice. The wastewater from the slaughtering process was discharged directly onto the area around the slaughterhouses. Figure 4 showed the slaughtering process and table 10 showed results from observation and checklist according to the criteria of slaughterhouse regulation. The majority of the small-scale slaughterhouses, did not satisfy all of the seven criteria described in the slaughterhouse law and regulation. The owners constructed simple facilities with only necessary equipment and located within their community (Table 11).Birds were sold only in the local community the same day they were slaughtered, but quantities were small, just enough to meet local demand. Incomes were limited and not sufficient to invest in improvements to the slaughterhouses to meet the Ministerial criteria, resulting in improper general and personal hygienic management were commonly observed in the slaughterhouses. (Table 12, 13) The prevalence of Salmonella was 3.17% in live poultry and 7.32% in carcasses. It was also found on utensils used in the slaughtering process, in both water used in the slaughterhouses and in waste water, and the soil around the processing plants, but it was not found on workers' hands. The prevalence of Salmonella in chickens before slaughtering, during the slaughtering and dissecting process, and in the local environment is shown in Table 14 and the serotypes of Salmonella identified are shown in Table 15.As for the drug resistance is concerned, it was found that 44.30% of samples of Salmonella (35 of 79) were resistant to nalidixic acid, followed by streptomycin 41.77% of the pathogens were resistant to at least one antimicrobial, while 50.63% (40/79) of the pathogens were multidrug resistant (Table 16). In this study, 100% of the pathogens were sensitive to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and cefotaxime. This finding is consistent with the results of antimicrobial resistant surveillance of food-borne pathogens in the EU countries which found that Salmonella was also susceptible to new antimicrobial agents such as cefepime, cefotaxime, and ciprofloxacin (67). This study further found that 44.30% of pathogens were resistant to nalidixic acid, which conforms to a previous study in Thailand by Padungtod and Kaneene which reported that Salmonella isolated from pigs and chickens in Northern Thailand in 2002 and 2003 was resistant to tetracycline and nalixidic acid (8). It also conforms to the study by Akbar and Anal which reported that Salmonella isolated from chicken in Bangkok was resistant to tetracycline and nalixidic acid (68). It has been reported that resistance to nalixidic acid might reduce the efficacy of members of the fluoroquinolone drug group such as enrofloxacin which has been widely used to control animal diseases (69).Moreover, de Jong et al. also reported that the extensive use of antimicrobials in both humans and animals was a fundamental cause of drug resistance (70). From these findings, it appears that antimicrobial resistant Salmonella might affect the use of antimicrobial agents for treatment of bacterial diseases both in humans and in animals.In this study, 50.63% of the isolates were found to be multidrug resistant. That finding agrees with previous reports from around the world, e.g., Spain, Vietnam (71)(72)(73), Algeria (61), China (74), United States (61), and Brazil (75,76). In Thailand, Chuanchuen et al. reported that 67% of Salmonella was MDR (77). Because the resistance of Salmonella to antimicrobial agents could affect both livestock production and public health, it is essential to closely monitor the problem of drug resistance and to urgently encourage the prudent use of antimicrobial agents in the EU countries and elsewhere as recommended by various studies (78)(79)(80)(81)(82).The meeting with policy-level DLD officers and the researchers was set up in 17April 2013. This meeting aimed to consult and advocate the high-level DLD officers regarding the current situation, problems, and it's solving option. The participants include director of the Bureau of Livestock Standards and Certification, Chief of Slaughterhouse Control Division, and the officers responsible for slaughterhouse control.Results from the meeting clarified that DLD officers agreed to the situation of small-scale poultry slaughterhouses and complications to get a license. The discussion confirmed more flexible regulations to get slaughterhouse license for small-scale slaughterhouses. Therefore, the policy is to assist small-scale slaughterhouse to get license through a more flexible regulation. Key points of policy landscape and situation include;-DLD understands that small-scale SH is important as a livelihood, a part of culture and community. Therefore, the policy is to assist small-scale SH to get license through a more flexible regulation.-The slaughterhouse control Act has been in place since 1992 under the responsibility of the Ministry of Interiors. There were attempts for strict enforcement since 2008 -2009 in order to standardize the practices for both domestic & exporting meat products. The deadline for slaughterhouses to obtain a license was in 2010, however, no enforcement until now.-At the moment, a revised slaughterhouse regulation is in progress.-Food education concept is a key approach adopted by DLD to deal with food safety issues and farms and slaughterhouse standard for more than 10 years. One of the campaigns is 'hygienic meat stall certification' in wet markets. So far, there are 2,500 certified meat shops nationwide.-Inter-agency collaboration are challenging, either between 3 slaughterhouse law enforcement authorities or between DLD and Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health who regulates selling points/ markets.-Food safety requires cooperation from both DLD (from farm to slaughterhouse and transportation to the market) and FDA (meat products & meat shops).The guideline to encourage the small scale poultry slaughterhouse to improve the plant according to the laws was also discussed. The proposed implementation included;-DLD categorized small-scale slaughterhouses into 3 groups, each requires different support: 1) already obtained license; 2) in the process of applying for SH license; 3) no intention to apply for a license. The last group would eventually be closed down.-DLD would focus on group 2. For this group, district level DLD has responsibility to survey the slaughterhouses located within the areas and provides suitable assistance. However, DLD accepts that there are limitations of district level staff, e.g. knowledge on regulations, workload.-DLD proposed a blueprint for small-scale slaughterhouse which would cost approximately THB 400,000 to invest. This model is cost-effective for slaughterhouse that slaughters at least 200 birds/ day. The blueprint of the small scale slaughterhouse was showed in Figure Before implementation, stakeholders associated with slaughterhouses in the area were identified using stakeholder analysis and included in the study in the early stage.Brainstorm meeting with identified stakeholder were set up in order to implement the knowledge transfer.The slaughtering process of the chicken of this raising group was traditional practice as described previously. To determine the effectiveness of the recommended practices, the meat samples were collected and test for Coliform and Total bacterial count in meat products which is showed in tableThis finding indicated that the developed blueprint and the minimum requirement were feasible, that the operator can invest and operated. The model used could potentially be replicated elsewhere in Nan Province as well as in other Thai provinces. However, to address wider impact, continued policy advocacy were required No 1 1.0 x 10 This study aimed to elucidate the status of small scale poultry slaughterhouses and their affect to ecological in the community in order to enhance hygiene and functioning of small scale slaughterhouses in communities by using the Ecohealth approach. Integrative research was used to elucidate the sanitation and disease prevention practices in small scale poultry slaughterhouses in Northern Thailand. Initial steps included the identification of stakeholders associated with meat production chain, development of a research framework, and designing the methodology based on stakeholder consultations. The framework and methodology derived combined at least five issue areas corresponding to the following disciplines; 1) public health 2) socio-economic 3) policy 4) veterinary and 5) community and environment.This study could elucidate that Ecohealth approach was well applied in this study.Various fields including Veterinary Medicine, Public Health, Social Sciences, Economics, and Ecology were successfully collaborated and applied. Conceptual framework could be developed. The importance and interaction among each discipline were demonstrated.However, applying Ecohealth in actual situation is still challenging. It needs a further study. In surveillance, prevention, and controlling emerging infectious diseases, including Salmonellosis, using the Ecohealth approach, one factor related to success is the on-going cooperative participation of individuals from diverse academic and private areas.Operational plans for the short term, the medium term, and the long term are necessary and require significant cooperation of both efforts and spirit. In many networks, members working together as a team rely heavily on the expertise of each of the individual team members. Thus the development and improvement of the organization, the individuals, the network, and the links are all important to the strengthening of the Ecohealth network.the zoonotic knowledge, the diseases control and prevention in the slaughterhouse should be improved.This study could be concluded that good hygienic management is not widely practiced in small-scale slaughterhouses in northern Thailand. This study elucidated that, in general, hygienic practices did not fully follow existing regulations and that the government provided guidelines are not implemented by many slaughterhouses. The presence of Salmonella in slaughtering process was evident of improper hygienic practices. Therefore, the improvement of hygiene management of small scale poultry slaughterhouse should be urgently improved.This is also the first comprehensive study describing the prevalence of Salmonella contamination and the antimicrobial resistance of that pathogen on the processing lines and in the environment surrounding small scale poultry slaughterhouses in Thailand. The study found contamination of Salmonella in raw poultry meat, on utensils used in processing, in waste water and in soil around the slaughterhouses, indicating they are sources of the spread of Salmonella both in raw poultry meat and also in the surrounding environment and local communities. The five most common Salmonella serotypes found in this study were among the top 10 serotypes causing human salmonellosis in Thailand, signifying a significant public health threat. In addition, the serotypes had a high rate of multidrug resistance. These findings highlight the importance of and the urgent need for controlling the use of antimicrobials in animal production and for improving management of small scale poultry slaughterhouses.Policy advocacy was performed through meeting with high-level DLD officers who are responsible for slaughterhouse control in Thailand. The instruction and minimum requirement for enhancing small scale poultry slaughterhouse to address food safety was developed and then pilot tested with native chicken raising group in Nan province. The laboratory results indicated that the biological meat quality including Coliform bacteria and total bacterial count contamination in poultry meat was lower compared with before implementation.In conclusion, this study could indicate that there were complex factors affecting to the hygienic management of the slaughterhouse. The contamination of Salmonella spp. in slaughtering process, meat, as well as the environment was clearly demonstrated that the potential risk for public health and ecological facet. These research findings were advocated for policy-level DLD officers and then the cost-effective model of feasible and good practice small scale poultry slaughterhouse was developed and tested. This study also demonstrated the potential of the Ecohealth approach for addressing a critical problem and it's solving at the interface of rural development and public health. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1463556067.json b/main/part_2/1463556067.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9fd882ec7e6c1a89ecdc3f7ce8d519fba345173d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1463556067.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"72b186d7a4ee984f8632863a0c8a445b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7dbbe326-cdcf-4679-9c0c-890fa54ed6ac/retrieve","id":"2100381709"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d2181169-4674-49f2-b158-63682814c608","content":"The authors would like to sincerely thank everyone who participated in making this report successful. First and foremost, the authors would like to thank the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT-Kenya for the opportunity to conduct this study. Special thanks to the lead person, Dr. Eileen Nchanji, for her leadership and support in coordinating the entire assignment. We sincerely thank the co-lead person, Mr Cosmas Lutomia, for his endless support and guidance during the data collection.The authors are highly indebted to all participants from various countries who spared their precious time to participate in this study and share valuable information. This evaluation would not have been completed without the critical role played by the key informants, who provided in-depth information that helped to formulate this report. Our special gratitude goes to our partners from different countries who went to the field to gather data that was essential in realizing the objectives of the study.March 2024 | Final Report iii models is to make high quality seed available as well as increase productivity. Similarly, delivery models' primary goal is to provide high quality seeds, increase productivity and make profit. The production and delivery model actors have principally put in place measures such as inspection, certification and training which helps them to effectively achieve their goals. Furthermore, the actors have put in place programs such as subsidies, flexible payment terms and bulk purchase discounts to increase their effectiveness in realizing their goals.The authors recommends that, to continue realizing the inclusivity of women and vulnerable groups, a multistakeholder approach geared towards women's empowerment should be considered for both production and delivery models. Additionally, a key cross-cutting issue is the lack of women in leadership positions so there is a need to establish mechanisms and strategies that will support women's involvement in leading bean seed entities. Women should be supported to effectively participate in contract farming. It is important to strengthen and expand the agrodealer network since they play an important role in the distribution of seeds.The study was conducted in 10 African countries where 166 bean seed production and delivery actors were interviewed. The survey intended to document various production and delivery models used across the regions, the extent to which they involve and benefit women and vulnerable groups, the extent to which they promote availability and access to high-quality seeds, and examine the measures put in place to ensure high-quality seeds reach last mile farmers.The study participants were nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), national agricultural research system (NARS), seed companies and farmer seed producer groups. Purposive sampling was used due to the limited number of bean seed actors along the chain ready to provide information on their activities. Data was collected using the surveyCTO platform and it was managed and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS), version 20.Most actors along the bean seed chain are primarily led by men. The most common production models practiced by the actors are contract farming, seed production cooperatives/groups and seed multiplication and distribution. To a small extent, the actors also utilize a community-based seed production model. The most notable delivery models are direct sales, followed by agrodealer networks and seed fairs and exchanges.The involvement of women and vulnerable groups in both the production and delivery models was found to be satisfactory at a rate of approximately 70%. In addition, the models were found to promote seed availability to men and women when they needed it at the right point and time. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that the models were inclusive increasing access to high quality been seed which was beneficial to women and vulnerable groups. However, the leadership of the seed actors is dominated by male at approximately 69%, which means that a significant number of women have no power to make key decisions along the seed value chain Been seeds provided by production and delivery models were found to be affordable. However, 19% of the bean seeds provided by the production models were considered to be either expensive or very expensive, whereas 26% of those provided by delivery models were also reported to be expensive or very expensive. This is consistent with the cost of seed, which was 16% and 17% higher for the production and delivery models, respectively.The main goals of production models are; ensuring availability of high-quality seeds and increasing productivity. While the primary goals of delivery models are; access to high-quality seeds access, profitability/market expansion, increased productivity, inclusivity and the promotion of rural/local economies. Both production and delivery models were reported to be effective at realizing the set goals at 73% and 69% respectively.The most notable programs/policies that have been put in place by delivery models to ensure that farmers afford seeds include flexible payment terms, bulk purchase discounts and credit schemes. In addition, both production and delivery models have enacted measures such as inspections, training, certification, testing, feedback mechanisms and traceability to enhance the quality of seeds as well as helping them in realizing their goals.In conclusion, the most common production model among the actors is contract farming with the exception of the national agricultural research system (NARS) partners who prefer seed multiplication and distribution models. On the other hand, the commonly adopted delivery model among the actors is direct sales except for the NGO partners who mainly utilize seed multiplication and distribution and agrodealer network. To a large extent, production and delivery models encourage active involvement of men and women in their activities. Additionally, these models are considered beneficial to both genders. However, it should be noted that leadership positions across the actors are dominated by male in contrast with their female counterparts. Furthermore, the models are beneficial and not primarily empowering women and vulnerable groups. This means that, to a great extent, females do not participate in making key decisions along the value chain. The main goal of productionThe common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the main feature of the daily diet for many households in sub-Saharan Africa. Rich in insoluble fiber and protein (Larochelle et al., 2017), these twin attributes contribute to the better nutritional status of the poor households in rural and urban areas (Nchanji and Ageyo, 2021).In Eastern, central and southern Africa, the role played by common bean in improving nutrition and food security of many households in both rural and urban settings is critical (Buruchara et al., 2011).Beans are mainly grown by smallholder farmers. In the food value chain, the first most important link to food security is seed (Galiè 2013). Unlike other crops such as maize, to a greater extent, the private sector has not adopted bean seed production and delivery because of the conventional practices of the majority of the farmers who plant recycled varieties. This hinders an increase in bean productivity due to the low adoption of new/ improved varieties despite the efforts of scientists and partners to bring forth these varieties. Due to the low demand for improved bean seed varieties, the private sector is not willing to engage in the production or delivery of these varieties because of low profit margins. The challenge of the private sector is creating stable bean seed demand given low profit margins (Neate and Guéi, 2010).It is estimated that the contribution of seed quality to a crop's total production is approximately 15-20% and largely influences the response of other efficiently managed inputs (FAO, 2018). Seed systems are the vehicles through which farmers obtain good quality seeds from the new crop varieties they want and need. Effective seed systems have the potential to increase production quickly and economically. Seed systems can influence food security by improving the availability, access to and use of improved varieties that increase the productivity and resilience of food crops (CGIAR, 2023).Advocacy has been done by researchers and development partners about inclusivity, innovativeness and gender sensitive distribution channels, in partnership with the private sector to reach all farmers with good quality seeds and varieties (Farnworth et al., 2024). These delivery channels address undesirable norms and unequal access to improved seeds (Bossuet, 2020). However, limited access to seeds of improved varieties by smallholders is an impediment to productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Limited supply, availability and access to bean seeds are likely among the most constraining factors for achieving crop productivity. Although bean breeders have produced several climate-smart bean varieties, the rate of adoption and variety turnover remain low, yet crop breeding is perceived as an important pathway for increasing yield potential and adapting small-scale farmers to climate change (Marcho et al., 2020). Additionally, farmers may not be well informed about the various options available to them or may be reluctant to experiment with new varieties. These challenges threaten production and can compromise the ability of individuals to meet their own food, nutritional, and income needs (CGIAR, 2023).Ineffective seed supply and delivery systems mean that smallholder farmers often recycle seeds or use older varieties, leaving them more vulnerable to pests and diseases. Recycled seeds that are often obtained from the informal outlets is commonly used by smallholder farmers in developing countries at an estimated percentage of 60-80% (Vernooy, 2016).Small-scale farmers, especially women and other disadvantaged groups, are particularly vulnerable to climate-related challenges, such as more frequent and severe droughts and erratic rainfall. The improved varieties distributed through informal seed systems don't reach women farmers on time (Hanif and Sperling, 2017).Due to women's restricted movement, it is impossible for them to access improved varieties which are not available in the local input outlets (Kramer and Gali`e,2020). Also, trust of the delivery models is gendered, for instance, in Malawi, males had no issue acquiring potato seed from beyond the village, whereas females focused their efforts on obtaining seed from fellow farmers within their communities. This was partially due to the women's apprehension that their spouses would hold them accountable if the harvest failed due to substandard seed (Mudege et al. 2016b). Seed access is determined through availability of information, mobility and networks of women and men, and affordability. According to Puskur et al. (2021), access to seeds on time is critical for the farmers because it influences not only the harvest, but also related decisions. Mudege et al. (2020) reported that involving women in seed production and management at the community level gives them access to varieties that addresses their needs, generates extra income through employment, and contributes to women empowerment. In communities, women obtain quality seed through alternative channels, including seed exchanges, informal labor supply, labor swaps, monetary loans, seed loans, and gifts. (Lukonge et al. 2015, Mudege et al. 2015, McGuire and Sperling 2016).More economic opportunities can be created for women through seed systems (Kandiwa et al. 2018) contributing to women empowerment (Puskur et al.,2021).Additionally, gender equality and empowering women are essential elements to food and nutrition security (Agarwal 2018).Consequently, it is important to understand the interrelationship between the two: gender and socioeconomic differences in seed and food security must be understood to target seed interventions effectively (FANRPAN, 2011).Therefore, there is a need to understand the key common bean value chain actors and document gendered seed production and delivery models by diverse chain actors in Africa. Furthermore, there is a need to assess the extent to which women and vulnerable groups participate and benefit from production and delivery models.The main objective of the study was to understand bean seed value chain actors. The study intended to document the gendered seed production and delivery models used by diverse value chain actors in 10 African countries implementing the Seed Equal project. The study area was split into three regions, Central, Eastern and Southern Africa. The Eastern African countries included Kenya, Rwanda, Burundi, Ethiopia and Uganda. The southern Africa block consisted of Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Eswatini while Cameroon represented the central region. The targeted value chain actors varied according to the different countries.In total, 166 actors were interviewed across the three regions. There was no limitation in geographical location; rather, the study purposively tracked and interviewed actors who were willing to participate in the study. The actors included NGOs, seed companies, national agricultural research organizations, and farmer producer groups. Other intermediary actors such as agrodealer outlets, aggregators/middlemen and traders did not participate in this study. 2.1 The study intended to answer the following questions:1. What are the production and delivery models employed by the various actors? 2. To what extent do the production and market delivery models encourage the involvement of women, and are they beneficial to women and vulnerable groups? 3. To what extent do the production and market delivery models promote the availability of and access to affordable high-quality seeds for both men and women? 4. What are the goals of the seed production and market delivery models? 5. What measures are employed to ensure the production and delivery of quality seeds?A structured questionnaire was developed by the Alliance and IRRI team and administered to the various actors involved in common bean seed production and delivery. Country partners were trained and guided on data collection ethics, as the consultants could not fly to all the countries. We worked with national agricultural research staff that are affiliated with the Pan African Bean Research Alliance (PABRA) program and have collected similar data over the years. The questionnaire was programmed and uploaded to a digital platform called SurveyCTO. Data quality checks were also conducted as the data collection progressed. The quantitative data collected was subsequently downloaded, cleaned and analyzed using the SPSS statistical software package. Descriptive analysis was used to compute frequencies, means, and percentages. This analysis helped provide a clear and concise overview of the data, making it more interpretable and informative.As indicated in figure 1, the bean seed chain actors analyzed were seed companies, farmer producer groups, NGO partners and NARS partners. To a great extent, seed companies work closely with farmer groups in production and delivery of bean seed. The farmer groups partnered not only with the seed companies but also NGO, NARS, and other government institutions such as the ministry of agriculture to produce and deliver bean seed. On the other hand, NGO and the NARS collaborates with other NGO, farmer groups and other government institutions. The seed companies are mainly formal by nature, meaning that they are officially established entities that have codified rules and procedures on producing and distributing seed. However, a study by McGuire and Sperling (2016) shows that farmers access 90% of their seed from informal systems. There is a common misconception that uncertified farmer-managed systems produce inferior seed. In contrast, a substantial proportion of wheat seed samples generated by farmers in Ethiopia and Syria exhibited comparable levels of physical purity and germination to certified seed samples (Bishaw et al., 2012).Another study in Tanzania also revealed that retail traders sell good quality seed in the market (Birachi et al., 2020 The producer groups are primarily farmer based, while the seed companies are predominantly private. The NGO partners are predominantly local, with only 28% of them being international. The analysis indicated that the majority of the farmer groups had mixed genders in terms of their composition (95%).At least 85% of the actors and partners involved in bean seed production use different models. Seed companies dominate (80%) in delivering the seeds, NGO closely follow suit at 72%, NARS at 64% while farmer groups participated in seed delivery at 45%. The leadership of all actors in the bean seed value chain is dominated by male. As shown in figure 2, partners that work with NGOs lead at 83%, bean seed farmer groups are male-led at 70%, seed companies at 64%, whereas those who worked with agricultural research institutions were 57% male. On average, approximately 17% of the actors and partners that participated in bean seed production and/or delivery are female. These findings are consistent with those of Vice Versa (2017) who stated that, to produce commercial seeds, a producer needs more land and capital; however, there are limitations for women to access capital and assets, which hinders them from investing in the agricultural sector (Nanyonjo and Nchanji,2023).The seed production actors and partners across the countries utilized different seed production models based on their practicability, country dynamics and nature. It was noted that the majority of the actors used contract farming, seed production cooperatives/groups and seed multiplication and distribution as their preferred models of production as shown in figure 3.To a small extent, all the actors also utilize a community-based seed production model. Contract farming reduces market uncertainty, improves access to inputs, knowledge, services, and provides higher income (Holtaland,2017). According to Simmons et. al. (2005), one way to increase seed production especially with the help of the private sector is the use of contract farming. The author argues that contract farming can reduce transaction costs and solve market imperfections (e.g. credit constraints, information gathering, infrastructure, storage, etc.) in linking smallholder farmers to market. With regard to the impact of contract farming, the existing literature has found positive effects on food security (Bellemare and Novak,2017), and rural transformation (Arouna et.al.,2021) access to markets, credit, technology, information and factor inputs (Ton et al., 2018), and technical efficiency of production, reducing transaction costs, and reducing production risks (Bellemare and Bloem, 2018).Contract farming has increased in many countries because of its significant advantages such as saving transaction costs and mitigating market risks (Gray and Boehli, 2005;Bellemare et.al.,2013).For actors who employed the contract farming production model, the main reasons cited were twofold. First and foremost, seed companies, for instance, lacked adequate land to practice commercial large-scale seed production to satisfy the demand for high-quality seeds; second, actors such as research organizations lacked the requisite labor force or manpower to engage in large-scale seed production on the large tracts of land they owned or leased. For those who practiced their own production, breaching contract terms by farmers was the main reason why they did not engage in contract farming. The most prevalent breach of contract was the sale of bean seeds outside their contractual terms to third-party players in the seed sector Ensuring the empowerment of seed systems entails three key components: firstly, the representation of both male and female farmers in decision-making processes concerning the operations of seed systems; secondly, the provision of equal opportunities for men and women as seed users and producers; and thirdly, the ability of women farmers to formulate strategic decisions pertaining to their access, utilization, and benefit from seed systems (Puskur et al.,2021).The seed production models used by production actors significantly enhanced the active involvement of women and vulnerable groups. The results indicated in figure 4, shows that 77% of the respondents considered the extent to which production models encourage the active involvement of women and vulnerable groups to be either satisfactory or very satisfactory. This is consistent with a seed credit model study that was conducted in Uganda which revealed that men and women farmers had equal access to seed, even though the quantities of seed obtained were determined by factors such as ability to repay and plot size. While women had greater access to improved seed than men, men received a greater amount of it on average. This can be explained by the fact that men own more acres of land than women (Nanyonjo and Nchanji,2023). On the other hand, 23% reported that the production models were either moderate, slightly satisfactory or unsatisfactory with regard to the participation of women and vulnerable groups. Most groups where agriculture is practiced, especially in rural areas, are composed of women; thus, the majority of the group members are women. These groups have a common interest in agricultural production. Most agricultural development partners prefer working with groups rather than individuals due to collective action and therefore working with these groups improves agricultural production (Tallam,2016). In addition, most cooperatives involved in agricultural production have a membership that comprises mostly women even though men might hold the leadership positions of the cooperatives.Contract farming can be considered slightly participatory since farmers are recruited based on their land size and ability to finance good agronomic practices essential for seed production. Farmers who fulfill these requirements are recruited irrespective of their gender. However, it is important to note that most production resources, such as land, are held by men, but the majority of agricultural workers are women. Studies by Brewin et.al. (2018), show that in Africa only 10-30% of contract farmers are women, yet women do a substantial amount of work in contract farming arrangements. Sometimes up to 70% of the labour requirements are supplied by women. Oduol and Mithöfer (2014) also show that where the value chain is well developed and the returns are high, women dominate the production stage while men tend to own the fields, make decisions on sales, and control revenues. This highlights the need to support women to effectively participate in contract farming, to the same extent as their male counterparts. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that the benefits derived from production models for women and vulnerable groups are consistent with their level of participation. While, 77% of the production models were considered to be either very beneficial or beneficial to women and vulnerable groups, 14% of the production models were noted to be moderately beneficial to women and vulnerable groups, with 7% of the models being slightly beneficial. Two percent of the models were considered not to be beneficial at all. Key findings from a 2018 Feed the Future Mozambique Innovations (FTF INOVA) study agrees with these finding by indicating that agrodealer businesses and business networks are male dominated but more women are hired in the business entities thus, improving their livelihoods. The study showed that the industry recognized women as being trustworthy, hard-working, and good at dealing with clients, thus, most actors invested in female agro-agents, input distributors and retailers to effectively target the last mile farmers, particularly women who face restrictions on their mobility and time (FTF INOVA,2018).Availability of quality improved seed is the ability of women and men farmers to get seed from the right place and at the right planting time (Kramer and Gali`e,2020). Availability of seed is influenced by the type of delivery channel or seed system. Although formal seed system actors frequently maintain skepticism regarding the quality of seed sourced from farmer-managed systems, the majority of farmers are more likely to place their trust in seed produced and supplied by their peers rather than seed purchased from commercial actors (Puskur et al.,2021). To a greater extent, seed production models promote seed availability to men and women when required at the right point and time across countries. As shown in figure 5, 78% of the models portrayed a good and very good distribution of seeds, hence promoting availability. This is in line with a seed credit model study carried in Uganda by Nanyonjo and Nchanji(2023) which revealed that women and men had equal opportunities in accessing seed even though the quantities were determined by other factors such as land size and ability to pay. Affordability refers to farmers' capacity to purchase seed at an affordable price, which might vary depending on the market (Puskur et al.,2021). Both quantity and quality of seed use is majorly constrained by lack money to purchase the seeds by the women ( As indicated in figure 6, approximately 19% of the production models across the countries were considered to be producing either expensive or very expensive seeds. However, the seeds provided through the majority of the production models were affordable (38%), with 11% being very affordable, while others were indifferent and were neither affordable nor expensive (31%). The affordability promoted by the current models increases the purchasing power of farmers and ensures that they obtain value for their investment in bean farming. Affordability of seeds is not gender-neutral. A significant barrier for women is the inability to afford seed, which has a negative impact on the quantity and quality of seed production (Mudege and Torres 2017). It increases women's reliance on farmer-managed systems and hinders their ability to purchase seed from formal systems. Data in Figure 6 shows that NGO production model can result in more affordable seeds, while for the producer groups, it contributes to more expensive seeds, this might mean that farmer groups need more training on reduction of production cost of seeds to make them more affordable. A cocoa study conducted in Ghana indicated that producer group membership significantly impacts technical efficiency and yield (Donkor et The cost of seeds produced through the highlighted production models by the actors across the countries was highly noted to be somewhat less expensive (45%) as shown in figure 7. However, for some (24%) of the production models, the cost of bean seed was reported to be approximately the same as that of other models used by other seed chain players within their respective countries. In particular, 5% of the bean seeds available through the production models were noted to be very costly.These findings indicate that most of the production models adopted by actors ensure that farmers have a better chance of purchasing seeds that are relatively cheaper without constraining their economic capabilities. Across the different countries, the actors had set various production goals that drove their daily activities and ensured customer satisfaction. Overall, some of the production model goals across the countries included ensuring high-quality seeds and increasing productivity, both reported at 84%.Other goals of the actors included promoting rural/local economies (67%), inclusivity (58%) and profitability (54%).The primary goal of the production models used by NGO partners is to increase productivity (85%), while that of producer groups, seed companies and NARS partners is to ensure high-quality seeds, as shown by 91%, 87% and 77%, respectively. However, it was also interesting to note that the seed companies were highly aimed at promoting rural/local economies (78%) through employment and stimulating the local business environment compared to other actors. The seed companies prefer engaging women to carry out farming activities on their farms because they consider them not only available but also affordable labor. In African agriculture, women make up between 60 and 80 percent of the labor force (FAO, 2011).Additionally, the results showed that the NGO partners strongly promoted education and training since they ranked highly at 59% compared to the other actors, which shows that they were interested in promoting literacy among the farmers regarding good agricultural practices. This finding is in agreement with those of Puskur et al. (2021), which indicated that women farmers' attendance at training sessions often is contingent upon navigating gender norms imposed by family and community.The production models used by the actors were highlighted to be effective (73%) at achieving the set goals. Some of the models (22%) were considered to be neither effective nor ineffective. This shows that the models were farmer centered and had the priorities of the farmer considered despite aiming at profitability. This was done through increasing farmers' access to quality seeds and training resulting in more income and improved livelihoods. Disaggregation by actors indicates that the production models adopted by NGO partners (80%) and producer groups (79%) were effective at achieving their goals. Additionally, the production models used by seed companies (70%) and NARS (64%) were found to be effective. These results are in agreement with a case study that was carried out in Uganda. According to Nanyonjo and Nchanji (2023), the seed credit model, which was implemented as a strategy to address the gendered seed access gap, has proven to be effective in diminishing the previously significant gender disparity in seed availability among smallholder common bean farmers in Uganda. The model facilitated the provision and accessibility of improved quality seed to both male and female producers, resulting in tangible advantages. Farmers who previously encountered difficulties procuring loans from peers or purchasing substandard seed are now assured of having access to superior seed.Measures put in place to ensure the quality of seeds available under the production models.Quality refers to the outstanding characteristics of a seed that can impact its performance. Good seed viability depends on both physical features (size, weight, color) and genetic quality (Puskur et al., 2021). To ensure the production of quality seeds, most of the actors had several measures put in place to drive their success. Some of the common measures used across the countries included inspections (90%), training (84%), certification (77%) and testing (74%). Other measures noted were traceability and feedback mechanisms, both recorded at 50%.As shown in table 2, disaggregation by actors indicates that the NGO partners embraced the training (91%) component as the most suitable approach for ensuring the production of quality seeds, while the producer groups, seed companies and NARS partners adopted inspections as the most efficient method of ensuring quality, recorded at 95%, 94% and 86%, respectively. Interestingly, technical assistance was also used as a measure to ensure the quality of the produced seeds by 2% of the producer groups and seed companies. According to Puskur et al. (2021), seed delivery channels are a critical component of seed accessibility and can be classified into three overarching classifications, commonly known as \"types of seed systems\": the formal national public seed system; the informal farmer-managed or community-based seed systems; and the formal commercial seed distribution networks. A significant divergence in the delivery models was observed among the actors. An array of delivery models were adopted by the different actors across the countries, with direct sales noted as the most predominant model used by 37% of the actors as shown in figure 8.Direct sales aim to considerably shorten the seed distribution chain by allowing seed producers to market directly to the buyers, thereby reducing both the direct and indirect transaction costs of distribution.Other models commonly used included agrodealer networks and seed fairs and exchanges, which were recorded by 17% and 15%, respectively. Private sector seed businesses are important players in the commercial seed delivery chain through formal wholesale and retail agrodealers; they supply popular hybrid varieties of vegetables and grains that farmers request each planting season. The seed supplied in this channel is branded and certified. In farmer-managed or community-based systems (informal), seed is acquired from local markets and/or traded through social and local networks, these networks are frequently moral economy-based (Bates et al. 2011, Schöley et al. 2017, Suma and Großmann 2017). The seeds are typically uncertified, not labeled, or quality declared (Puskur et al.,2021).Disaggregation by actors indicates that in addition to direct sales, to some extent, NGO partners also utilize seed multiplication and distribution (20%), seed fair and exchange (18%) and agrodealer networks (20%) as their main delivery models. On the other hand, seed companies use the public-private partnerships model (17%) along with direct sales. In addition to direct sales, producer groups and NARS partners also use agrodealer networks (27%) and seed fair and exchanges (19%), respectively. Agrodealers continue to play an important role in the distribution system of improved seeds and other inputs, enabling farmers living in the rural areas to access productivity enhancing tools and technologies. For instance, most seed companies reach farmers in Kenya through agrodealerships (Erenstein & Kassie, 2018). Because of the very dispersed markets and poor infrastructure in rural areas, the direct sales of seed companies in their own shops is very limited and most of their seed is sold through agrodealer networks (Erenstein & Kassie, 2018;Langyintuo et al., 2010).Public-private partnerships Seed fairs and exchanges Seed multiplication and distribution Women and vulnerable groups often seek empowerment and engagement in different agricultural activities. The analysis in figure 9 indicates that 69% of the models were either participatory or very participatory. According to the data provided by the actors across the different African countries, the models promoted participatory (41%) and active involvement of women and vulnerable groups to a significant extent, which made them part of the bean seed chain. Moreover, 28% of the respondents considered the delivery models to be very participatory, involving women and vulnerable groups. However, it is worth to note that, even though women participate in various activities of the delivery models, their roles and decisions aren't principal, they are either recruited as assistants or co-owners without much power to determine the entities' key operations. For instance, a study conducted by Bayesian consulting group (2016) revealed that, in Kenya, there are more men than women in agrodealership business with 63% and 37% being male and female respectively. This could be considered fairly participatory and thus, consistent with these findings.Owing to the strengthened, active and participatory involvement of women and vulnerable groups in the delivery models, the models were either beneficial or very beneficial, as reported by 70% of the actors across the countries. This has aided in boosting their income and enhancing their resilience to the everchanging agricultural dynamics exacerbated by climatic changes. Availability pertains to the tangible presence of an adequate quantity of seed in a suitable location and time, with particular emphasis on seed of preferred crops and varieties (Puskur et al.,2021). They further asserted that it is important for farmers to obtain quality seed on time, for increased productivity, food security and income. Furthermore, women and men's ability to access seeds at the right planting time and convenient place is enabled through the availability of quality seeds (Kramer and Gali`e, 2020).The delivery models utilized by most of the actors across the counties were highlighted to provide better availability of seeds to both men and women when required and at the right time, as shown by 77% of the models. The models performed well (44%) in terms of seeds being available at the right place and time. Moreover, 34% of the delivery models performed very well in ensuring the availability of these seeds to the farmers.Furthermore, the delivery models used across the countries were reported to promote inclusiveness in accessing affordable quality seeds among the majority of the actors, as reported by 78% (either the model was good (45%) or very good (33%) inclusive). Furthermore, 14% of the delivery models were considered to be moderately inclusive, whereas 7% reported that the models were poorly inclusive.Seed pricing affects the purchasing power of farmers over time, and they are often made to incur more costs during the planting season when the prices are too high. With the current delivery models adopted by the different actors, it was noted that 19% and 7% of the delivery models were expensive and very expensive respectively, with 33% providing seeds that were neither affordable nor expensive as shown in figure 10. A significant percentage of the models (31%) provided affordable seeds, while 10% were reported to be very affordable. It is important to note that some seed companies have resulted in the deliberate packaging of seeds in smaller packages than what has been previously on the market. These smaller packages are then delivered through direct sales and agrodealer networks, making the seed affordable for smallholder farmers, especially women and vulnerable groups. These findings coincide with those of McGuire and Sperling (2016) and Kandiwa et. al. (2018), which showed that small packages positively influence the purchase of seeds by women and young farmers. It was also noted that the majority of the seeds provided through the delivery models were somewhat cheaper (38%), while the cost was considered to be about the same (28%) as that of other delivery models. Sixteen percent of the models were reported to be much cheaper as reported above, the availability of small quantities of seeds has made it possible for the farmers to afford the seeds to some extent. Across the different countries in Africa,14% and 4% of the models were reported to be somewhat more expensive and expensive, respectively.The promotion of more affordable farm inputs, especially seeds, can be performed using different approaches, including credit schemes, aid or insurance, which eventually enhances the capacity of farmers to purchase seeds on time or at their convenience. Across the countries covered by the project, different actors noted a myriad of programs and policies enacted to help farmers afford the seeds supplied via the highlighted delivery models, but the most outstanding programs included flexible payment terms (32%),bulk purchase discounts (29%), credit schemes (22%), seed aid (11%),seed exchange programs (11%) and voucher programs(11%). In addition to the aforementioned programs and/or policies, it is worth noting that some of the NGO partners used project funding (3%) to help promote the affordability of the seeds among the farmers. This finding concurs with studies by McGuire and Sperling (2016) and Kandiwa et. al. (2018), which revealed that small packages, promotion as well as presentations in the local markets, all positively affects the purchase of seeds by young and women farmers.Disaggregation by actors shows that NGO partners have mainly put in place bulk purchase discounts (33%), credit schemes (30%) and subsidies (28%) as a means of supporting farmers in affording beans supplied by their delivery models. In contrast, seed companies have mainly implemented programs such as subsidies (59%),flexible payment terms and credit schemes (32%), and voucher programs (30%).The farmer producer groups mainly used flexible payment terms (41%) and bulk purchase discounts (37%), whereas the main NARS partner programs put in place to support farmers in obtaining affordable bean seeds under delivery models like bulk purchase discounts (33%) and subsidies (31%).Goal setting drives the success of any organization or firm since the goals provide a clear path upon which every actor/player will walk through the entire process toward success. Realistic goals help organizations realize their mandate and ensure quality service delivery and hence customer satisfaction. Across the countries involved in the project, some of the notable goals of the delivery models included ensuring high-quality seeds (72%), profitability/market expansion (64%), increased productivity (63%), inclusivity (59%) and promoting rural/local economies (58%). Other common goals noted were sustainability (37%), partnership and collaboration (31%), education and training (30%), climate change adaptability/risk management (27%), policy influence (25%), technological innovation (22%) and diversity (20%).Disaggregation by actors indicates that the NGO partners' main goals are profitability/market expansion (74%) and ensuring seed quality (69%). The goals of seed companies are to ensure high-quality seeds (82%), increase productivity (75%) and promote rural/local economies. Furthermore, the producer groups' main objectives are high-quality seeds (81%) and profitability/market expansion (80). The NARS partners' targets are profitability/ market expansion (63%) and high-quality seeds (55%).The attainment of set goals requires the utilization of proper and effective systems as well as the availability of human resources that are properly motivated to work and drive the success of an organization or company. Among the actors across the different countries of study in Africa, it was noted that the delivery models used by most of the actors were effective (37%) in achieving their set goals, with some reported that they were very effective (32%). Some delivery models (29%) were considered neither effective nor not effective. Actor based analysis indicates that the delivery models that are used by NGO partners and seed companies were found to be effective at 77% and 78% respectively. Further, the delivery models utilized by producer groups and NARS partners were reported to be effective at 64% and 57% respectively.Quality factors of production, including seeds, promote good harvests among farmers since the plants are well suited to the different climatic conditions and will have better bulk produce. Ensuring the quality of seeds produced is a major goal of most seed producers and was also highly ranked as the most common goal among the seed actors in the project countries. Table 3 indicates some of the measures enacted by the majority of the actors to ensure good quality of the bean seeds included inspections (71%), certification (70%), training (66%), testing (64%), feedback mechanisms (55%) and traceability (54%).Notably, the NGO partner's main measure of ensuring the delivery of quality seeds is training (77%), while the main measure for ensuring the delivery of quality seeds through the NARS is certification (80%). Conversely, the main measure put in place by seed companies and producer groups in facilitating the quality of seed delivered is inspection (80%).The overarching goal of key stakeholders in the seed sector is to meet their needs. This is achieved through the production and market delivery of high-quality seeds. Limited supply, availability, and access to bean seeds are likely among the most constraining factors on crop productivity. Effective seed systems have the potential to increase production. Seed systems can influence food security by improving the availability, access to and use of improved seed varieties. Countries across Africa have instituted diverse seed systems for the production and market delivery of common bean seeds.The study findings reveal that the most common production model practiced by actors is contract farming, followed closely by seed production cooperatives/groups, and seed multiplication and distribution. The most notable delivery models are direct sales, agrodealer networks and seed fairs and exchanges.The production and delivery models encourage inclusivity and are beneficial to women and vulnerable groups. Furthermore, the models promote the availability of and access to affordable high-quality seeds for men and women at the required times and point. However, it should be noted that leadership positions across the actors are dominated by male in contrast with their female counterparts. Furthermore, the models are beneficial and not primarily empowering women and vulnerable groups. This means that, to a great extent, they do not participate in making key decisions along the chain. For instance, seed companies and agrodealer outlets employ women to work in their farms, thus benefiting through salaries. Women also provide labour and participate in various farm activities but in the end, it is their male counterparts who makes decisions on the use of income that is generated from bean farming.The main goals of production models are ensuring high-quality seeds and increasing productivity. In contrast, the primary goals of delivery models are ensuring high-quality seeds, profitability/market expansion, increased productivity, inclusivity, and promoting rural economies. Notable programs/policies put in place by delivery models to help farmers afford seeds include flexible payment terms, bulk purchase discounts and credit schemes.The study underscores the effectiveness of the models in the production and delivery of high-quality bean seeds through the high ratings of the models highlighted. By doing so, farmers can harness the effectiveness of the highlighted seed production and delivery models to improve productivity and influence food security.To continue realizing the inclusivity of women and vulnerable groups, a multistakeholder approach that is geared toward women's empowerment should be considered for both production and delivery models.Additionally, a key cross-cutting issue is the lack of women in leadership positions as actors who participate in bean production and delivery models. The authors recommend the establishment of mechanisms and strategies that will support women's involvement in leading bean seed entities.Women should be supported to effectively participate in contract farming. It is also important to strengthen and expand the agrodealer network since they play an important role in the distribution of seeds.Annex 1: Questionnaire Seed Production and Market Delivery Models Questionnaire You have been selected to participate in this study because you are a key stakeholder in servicing the needs of the seed sector. The study aims to understand key bean/soybean/cowpea seed value chain actors. The study will document the gendered seed production and delivery models used by diverse value chain actors (NGOs, seed companies, government, research organisations, and farmers). Please indicate sources of information and provide any available documentation. We are requesting a few minutes of your time to take this survey. All the collected information will be treated as confidential and only be used for study purposes and to provide evidence for change in the existing legume seed systems. Don't know________ 4. Are these NGOs involved in seed production? _______1= Yes, 0=No 5. List the different seed production models used by these NGOs. (Select all the at apply): ___Codes: 1=Community-based seed production, 2=Participatory plant breeding, 3=Integrated seed sector development, 4=Seed multiplication and distribution, 5=Farmer field schools, 6=Contract farming (individual), 7=Seed revolving fund, 8=Seed production cooperatives/group, 9=Public-private partnerships, 99=Other, specify 6. For each of the seed production model selected, please rate how inclusive (in terms of participation and benefiting) you believe it considers women and vulnerable groups. 16. How effective do you believe the seed production and delivery models used by the NGOs are achieving their goals? Please rate each seed production model you have listed on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being not ineffective at all and 5 being very effective."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1466304943.json b/main/part_2/1466304943.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11e49bcc6e6588d0016e6f432f140e5df2f85422 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1466304943.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c2482b03c5c9c3fae693855cc86f5c43","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1036d140-e5ee-41f9-a590-c354cbe16478/retrieve","id":"-1276403354"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"99a158fb-0fbe-4384-9afe-847950160f78","content":"This brief explores Tanzanian farmers' requirements for sorghum seed products as input for discussions by CGIAR and NARES on seed product market segmentation and the design of target product profiles (TPPs). We applied a novel approach to identify the requirements-video-based product concept testing (VPCT). Through multiple engagements with breeders, farmers, and industry, we identified seven sorghum seed-product concepts, five targeting the end use-home use, feed and food, industrial malting, food and fodder, forage; one concept on cropping system-intercropping; and one targeting material type-hybrid. We sampled 1,100 farmers from the Dodoma and Shinyanga Regions, where each farmer evaluated and ranked three concepts. Farmers were most likely to have selected the hybrid concept as their most preferred concept, followed by the home use concept. Based on these results, we present a proposal for revisions of the current set of market segments and TPPs for sorghum in Tanzania-one the largest sorghum producers in Eastern Africa.Across Eastern and Southern Africa, the demand for sorghum is growing. Orr et al. (2020) projected that the demand for sorghum in Eastern and Southern Africa would reach 29.9 million t by 2050 under a \"business as usual\" scenario, up from 11.8 million in 2015 (an increase of 153 percent). Sorghum production is concentrated in the region's semiarid agroecologies where farmers regard them as insurance crops and are unwilling to rely solely on maize for household food security. Consumers perceive sorghum production as complementary to maize production. Sorghum can also be mixed with wheat flour to produce composite wheat flour (Poole et al. 2024). The market is growing for sorghum grain for animal feed and industrial brewing, even in countries where sorghum is traditionally grown for food (Srinivasa Rao et al. 2014). Population growth, consumer preferences, and growth in brewing and livestock-feed industries are driving demand up for sorghum across Africa. Against this background, future investments in sorghum breeding and seed systems development by CGIAR and the national agricultural research and extension Systems (NARES) have relatively high potential to deliver impact on economic and food security.Tanzania is one the largest sorghum producers in Eastern and Southern Africa, and the seventh largest producer globally. In area under cultivation, sorghum is the third most grown cereal in Tanzania, after maize and rice. It is mainly grown in semiarid regions under rainfed production systems. Most farmers intercrop sorghum with other crops, including legumes, maize, and cassava (Slakie et al. 2019). In the past decade, sorghum production has grown substantially. The quantity of sorghum produced increased by about 20 percent (Figure 1), from 838,717 t in 2012 to 1 million t in 2022 (FAOSTAT 2023). In addition, the area harvested increased by a similar percentage, from 839,423 ha in 2012 to 1 million ha in 2022. A growing export market has played a role in the expansion of sorghum production. The value of exported sorghum increased from USD 2.4 million in 2012 to almost USD 11.4 in 2022, which is more than a 300 percent increase in the past five years (FAOSAT 2023).Traditionally, sorghum has been a staple crop in Tanzania, forming an important component of rural diets. Most farmers produce sorghum primarily for their own consumption, where it is eaten as porridge or ugali (thick porridge), a traditional dish derived from mixing sorghum flour or a mixture of sorghum and maize or cassava flours with water. Portions of the sorghum harvest may also be used as feed for livestock. In past years, increased domestic demand has arisen for white sorghum from breweries such as Tanzania Breweries Company Limited and Serengeti Breweries Limited (Akpo et al. 2022a). The share of domestic use was estimated by Ndossi et al. (2021) as follows: brewing industry (43 percent), food (40 percent), and animal feed (7 percent). Traders (small and large scale) and processors are the main buyers in the sorghum grain market (Akpo et al. 2022a). White and red sorghum are available for home consumption and animal feed. 1200000 1000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 9 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 0 Production (t)Area harvested (ha)Research and development efforts focused on sorghum in Tanzania began in the early 1980s. Since that time, international research institutes such as the International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), along with national agricultural research systems, notably the Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), and various universities have worked together to develop improved sorghum varieties. According to the Tanzania Official Seed Certification institute (TOSCI), 2024, 18 improved varieties were released in Tanzania by 2023. Most of the improved cultivars are designed based on conventional breeding approaches, with a primary focus on agronomic traits, particularly yield and disease resistance. However, the efforts and investments targeted at enhancing uptake of improved varieties have only been partially successful, with significantly low adoption rates (Kimbi et al. 2020). One of the reasons for the low rate is development of products that do not respond to the requirements of farmers and end users (processors and consumers).Moving forward, the One CGIAR Initiative on Market Intelligence has an opportunity to inform crop-breeding efforts of CGIAR and NARES by shedding light on the requirements for farmers, processors, and consumers and the ideal seed products to respond to these requirements. The two basic elements to guide discussions are seed product market segments (SPMSs) and target product profiles (TPPs). The SPMS refers to a group of farmers with common variety requirements. In the context of CGIAR and NARES crop breeding, these segments are defined based on grower requirements (where and how the crops are grown) and end-user requirements (what the crop is used for). For each SPMS, there is a unique TPP that provides the blueprint for design of the ideal product for that SPMS and indicates the traits and characteristics required for a new variety to meet or exceed the requirements of growers, processors, and consumers.Table 1 presents the SPMSs for sorghum in the Eastern African Federation (EAF). These segments evolved out of discussions with the Tanzania Sorghum Product Design Team, a group of representatives from public and private sectors that informs SPMS and TPP design, that include farmer representatives, processors, seed companies, as well as scientists such as breeders, pathologists, seed systems specialists, and socio-economists. The main criteria that distinguish the sorghum segments are material type (hybrid versus open-pollinated variety, or OPV) and color (white/ cream versus red/brown). The market segment for forage sorghum that is produced for fodder only is listed as \"not current country priority\" and therefore is not included as a market segment.All the sorghum SPMSs include a variety of uses: food, feed, fodder, and malting. The corresponding TPPs for these segments contain 29 essential traits (i.e., targets that must be met for the advancement of new varieties), of which 3 to 4 are improvement traits. Delivering new products that meet the thresholds and targets of the 29 traits will be a significant undertaking. Production and agronomic and disease traits such as genetic purity, plant height, disease and pest tolerance, drought tolerance, and early maturity are required for all the seed products. However, there are some nutrition-enhancement and processing traits (such as proteins, starch, iron, and zinc contents; taste; grain color; tannin levels; and digestibility) that are linked to specific use (Table 2). By understanding farmer use requirements, a prioritization of end-use improvement traits can help to simplify the breeding process. identify alternatives to the current sorghum SPMS for TPP prioritization in Tanzania. Additionally, a concept of cropping system and the material type was included.The process of concept development involved qualitative research, including eight focus-group discussions with smallholders and interviews with various stakeholders, such as seed producers, traders, processors, and TARI, a national plant-breeding institute. Participation in a sorghum PDT meeting in Tanzania and continuous consultations with sorghum breeders at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) were also integral to the concept development. The discussions focused on the goals farmers had for their sorghum production, their preferred growing methods, uses of sorghum at home, experiences in selling sorghum, and preferences for maturity and color. Discussions with technical experts focused on the technological possibilities of breeding; the new types of products end users (processors and farmers) were interested in; and the suitability and potential of other types of sorghum not yet grown in Tanzania, such as hybrid sorghum and intercropping sorghum. Figure 2 shows the process of ideation of the sorghum concepts.Seven product concepts emerged from the ideation process (Table 3): Home use (food for the family), feed and food, industrial malting (grain for beer), forage, food and fodder, intercropping (sorghum and peas), and commercial (highyielding hybrid) products. See Annex 1 for a full overview of the concept's description. The main growers' goals of early maturity, high yield (compared to local varieties), and drought and disease tolerance were held constant in all the developed concepts. Farmers also indicated the color they would require in the products. The description of the concepts included the product goal(s) and any potential shortcomings that the use of the product may imply (e.g., reduced yield).The product-presentation videos were recorded in a professional studio in the local language (Swahili). A male actor posed as an agrodealer representative, dressed in a white lab coat standing behind a counter and in front of several bags of different seeds, herbicides, and pesticides. Stay green until maturityIn vitro organic matter digestability (IVOM)A quick review of the sorghum market segments leads to several questions for discussion with the Tanzania product design team (PDT), related to farmers' requirements for sorghum seed products:• End use: Do farmers require products that meet a host of possible end uses (e.g., food, feed, fodder, and malting) or are their requirements more focused on one or two end uses. The latter would allow for more feasible TPPs with few essential traits.• Color: In what color do farmers require the sorghum for different uses? Prioritization of different uses should include color considerations.• Production systems: TPPs are designed considering a monoculture production system. Do farmers grow sorghum under monoculture or intercropping production systems? If the latter, then this would imply the need to add a market segment that recognizes the intercropping production systems.This study used video-based product concept testing (VPCT). Product concept testing is early-stage market research that involves description of hypothetical products, and their potential uses and benefits to the customers. Product concepts (ideas) are usually developed, packaged, and presented to the consumers for evaluation. The underlying principle is that customers seek value from a product rather than the physical product itself (Luso 1975). For example, farmers will experiment with or invest in a new seed product only if they expect the product will help accomplish a particular task or goal (Campos 2021). In some cases, this goal may be higher yield under monocropping conditions; in other cases, the goal may be better-tasting food for the family and local market. Understanding the goals farmers seek from seed products will allow for nuanced segmentation and, in return, more impactful TPPs.In this brief, concept testing focuses on understanding the goals farmers have from producing sorghum and linking these goals to potential future seed products. Sorghum product concepts were designed mainly around specific farmer requirements related to end-user requirements to A total of nine videos were recorded, a video for each of the seven concepts plus an introductory and a closing video. In the product-presentation videos, lasting one to two minutes, the product was introduced and then the benefits and drawbacks of the concept were highlighted. The introductory video presented the scene (context) and explained what would follow, including the decision that the farmer would need to make. The closing video included guidance on the ranking activity and appreciation for listening.To evaluate the concepts, a household survey, which included 1,100 sorghum farmers, was carried out in Kongwa and Kondoa Districts of the Dodoma Region and Kishapu and Shinyanga Districts of the Shinyanga Region. Inspired by the tricot approach that uses incomplete randomized blocks, each respondent watched three different product concepts videos (out of the seven). The videos were randomized in subsets of three, where each concept was shown an equal number of times. In total, each farmer watched five videos: the introductory video, three videos describing different product concepts, and a closing video.After the respondents watched each concept video, they answered questions on each concept's similarity to the varieties they currently grow, their interest in trying the new concepts, their willingness to replace their current varieties with the new ones, and the color they would prefer for the products. Finally, respondents were asked to select their most and least preferred product for purchase if available at local agrodealer shops. The data analysis on the ranking of the concept was done by ClimMob software (de Sousa et al. 2022;Turner et al. 2020).The seven product concepts were assessed by ranking them across the whole sample (Figure 3). Table 4 shows the direct rankings among all the concepts, indicating the percentage of farmers who ranked a given concept (indicated in the row) before the other respective concepts (indicated in the columns). Additionally, we used regions, districts, and gender as covariates to split the sample in case of significant instability in the Plackett-Luce model, driven by difference in rankings (Figure 4). Figure 5 indicates the color preference for each concept. We discuss the seven concepts in categories following the farmer ranking: the first tier, the middle, and the last tier, given their probability of being ranked as the most preferred, respectively.The best performing concepts (first tier) were the highyielding hybrid and food for the family (Figure 3). They had the highest probability of being ranked as the most preferred by the farmers. In the direct ranking between the concepts (Table 4), the two concepts had a higher percentage of farmers preferring them over the other five concepts. However, in a direct comparison with each other, high-yielding hybrid had a slightly higher win probability compared with the foodfor-the-family concept. The Plackett-Luce model (Figure 4), however, indicated that there was some divergence between regions, districts, and gender. Women in Dodoma (in both Kongwa and Kondoa Districts) and men in Kongwa District preferred the concept of food for the family over the high-yielding hybrid, while in the Shinyanga Region (Kishapu and Shinyanga Districts) both men and women preferred the concept of high-yielding hybrid to that of food for the family. The middle tier includes the intercropping (sorghum and pea), food and fodder, and food and feed (Figure 3). The intercropping concept was the most preferred of the three concepts, while there was no clear leader between food and feed and food and fodder (Table 3). However, men in the Kondoa District, Shinyanga Region, preferred the food and feed concept slightly more than the intercropping concept (Figure 4). The last tier includes concepts that were least preferred, namely grain for beer and sorghum for forage (Figure 3). These concepts were not prioritized by the farmers, especially sorghum for forage, which scored lower than the rest of the concepts. However, men in the Kondoa District, Shinyanga Region, preferred the forage concept slightly more than the grain for beer (Figure 4). Across all the concepts, white sorghum grain was preferred by 70 percent of the sample (Figure 5). Among the seven sorghum-seed product concepts developed, farmers were most likely to have selected hybrid and home use concepts as their preferred concepts. The intercropping concept ranked third, followed by feed and food, food and fodder, industrial malting, and forage. The preference for the hybrid concept indicates a rising interest in sorghum as a cash crop for the brewing industry and for export. Over the past five years, regional exports of sorghum from Tanzania have surged by 300 percent (FAOSTAT 2023).For the concept on food for the family, farmers were willing to sacrifice 20 percent of yield for a product that has good home consumption qualities, which highlights that sorghum forms an important part of rural diets and that its value is in home use. The preference for the intercropping product concept reflects farmers' interest in sorghum seed products that complement legume production. Sorghum for forage was the least preferred concept, indicating that the value of sorghum is largely for grain production. Across all the concepts, white sorghum grain was preferred by 70 percent of the sample. White color is a must-have requirement for national and regional markets and is also considered to provide better-tasting sorghum-based foods.The results support discussions on refinements to sorghum segmentation. First, the study identified hybrid and home use (food for the family) as priority market segments. There is an existing breeding pipeline for hybrids in Tanzania that supplies 2 percent of the market. The strong preference for hybrids indicates the need for increased investments in breeding and seed systems of hybrid seed products. A new current market segment was identified-the home use segment. Conversations with farmers, processors, and food scientists are required to better understand what traits determine \"good taste\" and \"good cooking qualities\" and how best to measure these traits. Second, three near-term future market segments were identified: intercropping (sorghum and peas), food and feed, and food and fodder. Currently, breeding efforts do not support the intercropping segment, but it is a recognized need among farmers. Third, a potentially long-term future market segment was recognized: forage sorghum. Currently, these seed products are unavailable in Tanzania and are not in demand among farmers. Nevertheless, this does not mean that they should be overlooked, especially with increased climate variability in mind: forage sorghum is outstandingly drought resistant and grows where maize is not able to grow because of high temperatures or dry conditions. In future it could be a good substitute for maize in silage making for livestock. Finally, white sorghum varieties should be prioritized.FAOSTAT This product is called \"Feed and Food.\"This sorghum seed was designed to provide your family with grain that is useful for feed and food.The seed provides grain with improved protein, which makes it suitable as feed for your own chickens and pigs. You could also sell the grain to other farmers or traders who process animal feed.The seed is also used for food, but less attention has been given to cooking qualities such as taste. The seed may not be as good for food as a product that is designed for food only. The seed is not designed for fodder or malting.This product is called \"Food for family.\"The sorghum seed is focused on serving your cooking needs; the cooking qualities has been given priority.• Nutrition: higher level of iron and zinc • The grain gives a good amount of flour when milled.• The product gives a sweet taste to your uji or ugali.• It cooks easily.• It is easy to thresh. The seed has 20% less yield compared to the other improved seed. This means that if the other improved seed give you 10 bags, this seed will give you 8 bags assuming you planted on a similar farm. However, it still has higher yield than the local varieties. The seed is not designed for animal feed, fodder, or malting.This product is called \"Grain for beer.\"This sorghum seed is mainly focused on serving the needs of the processors in your area. It has large grains and is highly demanded in your area by traders and processors for industrial beer making. This is a sorghum seed for income purposes only. It is not designed for food, feed, or fodder. This product is called \"Forage for animals.\"It is a hybrid sorghum seed designed for making livestock feed. It is harvested before the grain matures, at 100-120 days. It has soft leaves and stems that are easy for the animals to eat and get nutrients. You can use it to make silage for your livestock or sell the silage for income. This seed is not recommended if you grow sorghum for grains.Dual purpose: Food/fodder This product is called \"Food and fodder.\"The sorghum seed is designed with qualities that make it suitable for food and fodder.It has big and soft leaves and stems that are easily eaten by livestock for fodder. However, this quality reduces the grain yield of the plant.The seed is also used for food, but less attention has been given to cooking qualities such as taste.The seed may not be as good as for a product that is designed for food only. The seed is not designed for malting and grains for animal feed.This product is called \"Sorghum and peas.\"This sorghum seed is designed to perform well when you combine it in the field with peas such pigeon pea, cowpea, and chickpea. By growing this sorghum seed and peas on the same plot, you improve your soil and yields, and you increase varieties of food available for your household. Please note that planting two crops in that same plot makes it difficult to plant, manage, and harvest, which increases labor cost. It also makes it difficult to use machines for planting, spraying, harvesting, etc., in the case of large farms.This product is called \"High-yielding hybrid.\"This sorghum seed is designed to be high yielding. It yields about 30% more compared to other improved seeds. This means that if the other improved seed gives you 10 bags, this seed will give you 13 bags, assuming you planted on a similar farm. The product is mainly for selling to traders who buy grain for food processing. You can also use it for food, but less attention has been given to cooking qualities such as taste. Please note, you will need to buy seeds every season to maintain the yield benefit. Planting seed from your harvest will reduce the yield. This product is not designed for feeding and malting."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1471864388.json b/main/part_2/1471864388.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c096f2bb827855373efee61cd004d17b589376d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1471864388.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"177a70af82a14fbc7d8d1d88eb0612d6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a4ad1220-57b4-40de-b7bb-b81791a72fe1/retrieve","id":"322016460"},"keywords":["Coastal aquaculture","climate change","climate-smart agriculture","shrimp farming","climate-smart aquaculture"],"sieverID":"3559d28c-b790-4b34-8428-538cec427fa8","content":"Coastal aquaculture, particularly brackish water shrimp farming, plays an important role in the socio-economic development of most coastal communities on the North Central Coast (NCC) of Vietnam. However coastal aquaculture in the region is among the activities most affected by increasing global climate change, which threatens sustainable development of the fisheries sector, as well as food security of the country. Within the action plan framework for adaptation and mitigation for climate change in the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), climate-smart aquaculture (CSA) trials have been conducted in Hoang Phong commune, Thanh Hoa province in 2015 by WorldFish, the Vietnam Institute of Economics and Planning (VIFEP)and Thanh Hoa Agriculture Extension Center (TEC). In the farm-level climate-smart aquaculture trials, tilapia was raised in rotation with tiger shrimp, mud-crab and seaweed in a traditional extensive aquaculture system. Initial results show that the aqua-smart practice under the CSA approach is a \"triple win\" for local aquaculture farmers through: (1) sustainably improving aquaculture productivity and farming efficiency of the current production system; (2) increasing adaptive capacity and resilience of coastal aquaculture to climate change; and (3) contributing to climate change mitigation. However, a number of constraints, such as lack of high quality fish seed and feeds, low market uptake for tilapia and uncertainty from extreme climate events, should be considered in scaling out the aqua-smart practice throughout the region.It is estimated that between 660 and 820 million people globally depend on fisheries 1 for their livelihoods and income. Of these, 58.3 million, including 84% of the people living in Asia, are directly engaged in the primary production (FAO 2014). The sector's contribution to food and nutrition security, gender equity and poverty reduction is increasingly recognized, particularly in developing countries. However, current patterns of increasing fish consumption and production imposes pressures on fisheries resources and ecosystem services. For the last 10 years, global production of capture fisheries has levelled around 90 million tonnes annually. This implies the need to increase aquaculture production to compensate for expected future shortages of fish for food. An analysis of future supply and demand for fish suggests that current levels of aquaculture production need to double in the next few decades to secure food and nutrition for the growing populations (World Bank 2013).In addition, climate change is already largely hampering the global food production systems, including aquaculture (FAO 2014). The physical changes in climate, such as increase in temperature, variation in rainfall patterns, rise in sea level and increase in frequency and intensity of extreme climate events, have brought negative impacts on the physiological, ecological and operational processes in aquaculture (Handisyde et al. 2006;Daw et al. 2006;Badjeck et al. 2010).Adapting to and mitigating the negative impacts of climate change require changes in aquaculture practices, farming community attitudes, as well as the locations of farming facilities.In view of resilience, adaptability and diversification of farmed species, it is argued that aquaculture will be able to respond appropriately to climate change impacts and emerge as an alternative livelihood (De Silva and Soto 2009). Furthermore, it has also been argued that increased production will have to come from simple farming technologies, which farmers can easily adopt, and involve both production of more low-priced food species and high-value species (Troell 2009). It is widely accepted that agriculture 3 is particularly vulnerable to climate change. The impacts of climate change, compounded with increasing global demand for food, pose higher risks to livelihoods and food security, especially that of the world's poorest people (IPCC 2014).Agriculture, however, is also responsible for a large portion of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as it is mostly driven by the extensive use of natural resources, such as deforesting forest lands, converting mangrove stands to aquaculture, or using fertilizers and energy inputs in agriculture production. This therefore requires the introduction of new inputs, techniques and services that can improve crop productivity without further degrading natural resources, such as soil and water, and the environment, while adapting to a changing climate and increasing resilience to risks from extreme weather events (Steenwerth et al. 2014).The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) coined CSA in response to the intertwined global challenges of food insecurity, poverty and climate change. According to FAO (2013), CSA is \"agriculture that sustainably increases productivity, enhances resilience, reduces/removes greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), and enhances achievement of national food security and development goals\" (Figure 1). This concept has been developed not only to simply 3 FAO (2010) defines agriculture in the broader system of agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture, and forestry 10 focus on technologies or practices, but also to represent a set of strategies that can deal with climate change impacts by increasing resilience to weather extreme events, adapting to climate change and reducing GHG emissions. The CSA approach thus aims to improve the integration of agriculture development and climate responsiveness that supports sustainable and equitable transitions for agriculture systems and livelihoods across scales (i.e. ranging from the local to global) and time horizons (i.e. over short and long term) (Lipper et al. 2014;Steenwerth et al. 2014). Although CSA emphasizes agricultural systems aiming to attain three objectives, it does not mean these objectives have to be met by every applied practice and/or in every location (FAO 2013;Lipper et al. 2014). The relative importance of each objective may vary across locations and/or situations, hence potential synergies and/or trade-offs will vary between and among the objectives. For example, in developing countries where food security and poverty reduction are of high priority, the focus will be more on stabilizing and sustainably increasing agriculture productivity, improving income and building adaptive capacity. In contrast, CSA approaches in developed countries may emphasize more on climate change mitigation through increasing production efficiency and reducing GHG emissions from agriculture (Lipper et al. 2014;Steenwerth et al. 2014). Therefore, achieving the targeted growth with a lower emission trajectory will require concerted efforts to maximize synergies and minimize trade-offs between productivity and mitigation (FAO 2013).Enhances the achievements of national food security and development goalsThere are a number of climate-smart agricultural practices and investments that have been provento significantly contribute to both climate change adaptation and GHG mitigation, including agroforestry, zero tillage, use of cover crops, intercropping, water conservation, water and nutrient investment and use of diverse varieties. Aquaculture technologies and practices that reduce energy consumption and optimize carbon sequestration also provide opportunities for mitigation (FAO 2013). For example integrated multitrophic aquaculture systems, which are not only less reliant or even non-reliant on fishmeal and fish oil inputs, but also utilize waste inputs from more intensive aquaculture, have higher potential for expansion than production systems that are dependent on capture fisheries commodities.Recognizing the role of aquaculture as an important food production sector, FAO (2013) suggested three practical themes in developing various CSA strategies for the aquaculture sector:(1) Increasing sustainably production, yield and efficiency: primarily focusing on intensifying production; using better integrated systems; improving stocks; making feeding more efficient and reducing losses from diseases;(2) Reducing vulnerability and increasing resilience: improving farm site selection and design; individual/cluster insurance; using indigenous or non-reproducing stocks to minimize biodiversity impacts; improving efficacy of water usage; shifting from capture fisheries to coastal aquaculture; selecting for short-cycle production; improving water sharing; improving seed quality and efficiency; and(3) Reducing and removing GHGs: primary options include integrated multitrophic aquaculture and better pond management.Coastal aquaculture is the production of aquatic organisms in brackish and saline water, and is becoming increasingly popular in tropical countries (Troell 2009). This aquaculture system is highly diverse in practices and is dominated by integrated farming practices of multiple species (e.g. shrimp/prawn, mud crab, milkfish, seaweed, mussel and clam). The review by Troell (2009) shows that integrated aquaculture systems are dynamic, resilient and versatile, as their structure and function can change according to different locations, seasons, species and social environments. Among existing integrated aquaculture systems, polyculture is dominant (60%), with shrimp as the major species group being grown (76%), along with tilapia (29%) and milkfish (16%) (Troell 2009). The relationships between those cultivated species and their environmental systems largely depende on the biological characteristics of the species and the degree of farming intensification. In an extensive polyculture system mostly based on natural productivity, stocking aquatic species of different feeding habits together enables a more efficient utilization of pond resources. However, only a proper combination of ecologically different species at adequate densities will utilize the available resources efficiently, maximize the synergies between species and species-environment relationships and minimize the antagonistic ones.coastal aquaculture systems have been practiced for centuries in Indonesia, China and Hong Kong, and more recently in the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam and Thailand (Troell 2009). In this system, most of the farms prioritize either shrimp (P. monodon, P. vannamei, M. ensis) or milkfish production. Crabs and other species are sometimes added as minor species for aeration, or added opportunistically if the market and environmental (i.e. salinity) conditions are favorable.According to Troell (2009), integrated aquaculture directly benefits farmers either through added value products, improved water quality, disease prevention, habitat conservation and greater allowed production volumes through waste reduction (emissions reduction). In the context of constrained inputs and resources (e.g., water, land, feed and energy), climate change and the need to address the negative environmental impacts from aquaculture, viable climate-smart aquaculture (aqua-smart) systems should be developed based on the most suitable techniques, and considering both traditional and more innovative practices.In Figure 2 presents the overall framework of the ECO-SAMP project approach from local to regional scales. Pilot activities under the project were implemented in Hoang Phong commune, Hoang Hoa district, Thanh Hoa province, which is on the NCC of Vietnam. The lessons learnt from the project will be scaled out and up to enhance community resilience and promote aquasmart management practices and institutions in northern and north-central Vietnam. practices and related supports, but also serve as a baseline for evaluating the project impacts.The follow-up activity in 2015 was a CSAq trial, a key project intervention, at the farm level.The field trial was developed by WorldFish, VIFEP and TEC, in accordance with the results of the baseline study and farmers' perceptions of the CSAq intervention in the region. Local farmers were selected to test the CSAq practices on their farms with financial and technical support from the project. Participating farmers were trained by the project team on aquaculture management practices as well as business management skills, including farm budgeting and marketing, for successful adoption of the practice. In addition to providing support, the project also looked into improving resilience capacity for local farmers by promoting community-based adaptations 4 We use \"CSAq\" here to avoid a confusing with \"CSA-climate smart agriculture\" in general.1. In accordance with the analysis results and the NTP-CC program, the ECO-SAMP project was implemented in Thanh Hoa province, which has the largest brackishwater area in the NCC region (7,700 ha or about 15.93% of the NCC's total brackish water aquaculture area). Brackishwater aquaculture in the province is concentrated in the coastal districts including Nga Son, Hoang Hoa, Quang Xuong, Tinh Gia and Nong Cong, with farmers growing diverse cultured species, such as shrimp (tiger shrimp, white leg shrimp, nipper shrimp), mud-crab, mollusks (clam, oyster), seaweed and brackishwater fish. Shrimp farming accounts for 87% (4,024 ha) of the total brackishwater aquaculture of the province, of which 97% is improved extensive production (Thanh Hoa DARD 2012). Hoang Hoa and Quang Xuong are major shrimp-growing districts, holding 38.1% and 18.4% of the total culture area respectively.The project acivities were piloted in Hoang Phong commune, located in the southeastern area of Hoang Hoa district, Thanh Hoa province. About 90% (280 ha) of the aquaculture area in Hoang Phong is in brackishwater and half of this (140 ha) is located outside the sea dike. Brackishwater aquaculture is dominated by extensive polyculture systems in earthen ponds, accounting for about 80% of the total cultured area in the commune. Some of the more commonly stocked species are tiger shrimp (P. monodon), mud-crab (Scylla sp.), fish (e.g. seabass, sea mullet) and seaweed. This integrated aquaculture system features low stocking density and less use of inputs.The method was common in Vietnam during the beginning of the 1990s, however farming methods have only changed by a little, since local farmers started this practice. Despite the drastic changes in breeds being cultured, the weather and availability of natural resources, local people still apply traditional farming methods. Annual production of brackishwater aquaculture in Hoang Phong is estimated at around 410 tons, of which seaweed accounts for 80% of the total production. Although tiger shrimp is considered as the major cultured species in the system, the yield of shrimp is quite low (ranging from about 50 to 300 kg/ha/year), compared to more intensive monoculture systems in the Red River and Mekong River Deltas.Vietnam, and the NCC of Vietnam in particular, have been experiencing climate change for the last 50 years based on meteorological observations. Recent changes in climate have brought about negative impacts on the coastal aquaculture system in Hoang Phong. Climate data shows rainfall patterns in Thanh Hoa have changed by a decrease in frequency, but an increase in intensity (VIFEP 2013). This resulted in great fluctuations in pond water environment (i.e. salinity, pH). Further with 'Tieu Man' flooding frequently occurred in June, pond salinity sharply decreased and dropped to the lowest level (about 2-3%) during the September-October period (Figure 3). The low salinity means shrimps and mud-crabs are more vulnerable during this period.Increasing temperature and high variations between day and night temperatures also cause shocks to cultured species, thus increasing risks of crop failure, particularly in environmentally sensitive species such as shrimp. Leaving the pond empty during the 'Tieu Man' period is the current solution and response of most farmers in Hoang Phong to minimize their risks. This adaptation solution however results in a reduction of the farmers' income. Therefore there is a need to find suitable cultured species and/or farming practices that can help local farmers adapt to climate change, reduce production risks, while sustainably increasing their income. and (4) investment requirement (see annex 1 for the result). Once tilapia had been chosen as the species to be introduced, five local households were selected to conduct the trial on their own farms with financial and technical support from the ECO-SAMP project. Costs of fingerlings and 30% of the feed costs for testing the practices, or an average amount of $1,000 per household, were subsidized by the ECO-SAMP project.Table 1 shows the technical details of the CSAq trial for different salinity levels. Regarding the tilapia crop, three farm trials were set up in high salinity areas (4-22% salinity), with an average size of 1 ha. These farms cultured tiger shrimp with other species, like mud-crab, seaweed and natural fishes in an integrated and/or rotation system. two of the farm trials were in low salinity locations (1-10% salinity) with an average pond size of 0. In addition, trials on community-based adaptation were also implemented to improve adaptive capacity and resilience of the Hoang Phong community in general, and the aquaculture cooperative in particular. The main objective of the community-level trial is to improve collective actions of farming communities. Two meetings with the management board and the four community groups of the cooperative were held to consolidate cooperative regulations as well as to discuss the potential for upscaling the CSAq practices in the next year's crop.Gender issues were also assessed to explore gender roles in scaling up the tested CSAq practices in other aquaculture communities. Two community group meetings were organized for women farmers to discuss: (1) women's participation in decision-making and farming activities in the household; (2) women's roles in micro-credit systems (informal, semi-informal and formal) in the locality.A brief profile of the CSAq trial households is given in Table 2. The average household size is about four people, with two of them counted as part of the labour force. This figure indicates a similar dependency ratio to that of the whole commune. Land is the main production asset and varies among households in the Hoang Phong commune.Among the trial households, land size ranges from 0.7 to 1.4 hectares, of which aquaculture land accounts for 81.86% of the total household land. The differences in land size can be explained by the age of the household, as the older households usually have larger land assets.In accordance with land ownership, the household's livelihoods are diverse, with the three main activities of agriculture (rice and vegetable crops), aquaculture and livestock rearing. The annual average income of the trial households is around VND87 million (USD 3,909) 5 . Aquaculture remains a major source of the household income, accounting for 80% of income. This means that improving aquaculture plays an important role for increasing income and improving the household's well-being. The results of the CSAq trial of integrating mono-sex tilapia into traditional aquaculture system in Hoang Phong are given in Tables 3 and 4. In general, tilapia grew well in all tested farms.After four months, the harvested tilapia had an average market size of 650 gram/fish, and varied from 500 to 700 gram/individual. In consideration of market uptake and size of tilapia, the harvest was divided into two or three times depending on the trial household. This practice ensures a good price for their harvest. The average productivity of the total farm harvest in low salinity areas was 3.1 tons per hectare, two times higher than that of higher salinity farms (1.3 tonnes/ha). This productivity difference could be mainly explained by differences in stocking density as the low salinity farms had double the stock density of the high salinity farms. Another reason could be that the salinity shock in high salinity farm ponds at the time of stocking led tothe death of about 10% of fingerlings stocked. It is thus suggested that farmers do salinity acclimatization of tilapia before stocking them in high salinity farm ponds.Even though the low salinity farms had higher yields, their average food conversion ratio (0.96 FCR) was double that of the high salinity farms (0.45 FCR). This suggests that low salinity farms highly depend on artificial pellet feed sources, which reduces economic efficiency. The productivities of shrimp and mud-crab were not affected by tilapia integration as these two species were stocked in April before the project intervention. It should be noted however, that stocking of tilapia had positive effects on seaweed growth. Tilapia helps clear the wild mosses 6 that compete with seaweed growth. The average yield of seaweed of 8.5 tonnes/ha increased by about 30% from the previous year (6.5 tonnes/ha).In terms of economic efficiency, Table 4 shows the details of cost-benefit analysis of the CSAq trials. On average, the net income earned from the trial was about VND 73 million/ha/household (USD 3,280), and tilapia contributed 28.8 -35.2% to the total aquaculture income of household.It should be noted that the calculated cost-benefit does not incorporate a reduction of costs for removing wild mosses. The participating farmers estimate the cost reduction for removing the moss to be around VND 6 to 7 million/ha/year.A comparison of the different trials shows the net income of the high salinity farms was 1.6 times higher than that from the low salinity farms, as the high salinity farming systems had an additional income from seaweed. Another reason is the higher economic efficiency of the high salinity farms due to a lower FCR and the use of available natural feed sources. This is presented through the benefit-cost ratio (B/C) given in Table 4.6 small flowerless plants that typically grow in dense green clumps or mats, often in damp or shady locations 20 As an omnivorous species, tilapia can feed on organic detritus and wastes, thus helping to reduce significant amounts of excess nutrients, improving water quality for shrimps. This also promotes production diversification. The integrated culture of shrimp and tilapia has been practiced in several countries such as Ecuador, Thailand, Philippines and Indonesia. It is estimated that such cultures in Ecuador increased shrimp harvest size by 18% and total production by 13-17%, and lowered FCR by 15% (Troell 2009).Implication on livelihoods and food security. The NCC is among the poorest regions of Vietnam.In 2014, the rate of households at poverty line and marginalized poverty line were about 12.22% and 8.58%, respectively (MOLISA 2014) 7 . Coastal aquaculture is an important livelihood for most coastal households in the region. This implies that sustainable development of the coastal aquaculture system is crucial in achieving food security, especially with the pressures from the growing population and increasing climate change. Successful integration of mono-sex tilapia contributes to production gains alongside poverty reduction through improved contribution to income sources (14.23-42.86% of the total household incomes). Tilapia production also provides local people with better access to fish for food and nutrition.Implication on climate change resilience. The introduction of tilapia has improved resilience of coastal aquaculture systems through diversification of cultured species. This can both increase the efficiency of the system and build their resilience to climate change. It can spread risk and increase economic resilience at the farm and local community levels. Tilapia crops can serve as \"risk insurance\" for households experiencing shrimp crop failures due to climate change.Additionally, tilapia also improves pond environments as it is a \"filter-feeder\" that reduces risk of disease outbreak in the shrimp.Implication for low carbon aquaculture practices. The rapid development of intensive and semiintensive fed aquaculture systems, such as shrimp and finfish, aim to meet growing demand, but these are often associated with negative environmental issues. One of the main environmental problems is the discharge of significant nutrient loads from open water systems and effluents from land-based systems into coastal waters. Improved energy efficiency and decreased use of fish meal and fish oil feeds are essential mitigation strategies. The integrated coastal aquaculture system of shrimp, mud-crab, seaweed and tilapia makes use of available natural feed sources and wastes. This thus significantly reduces the use of industrial feed, which is one of the main contributors to the carbon footprint of aquaculture systems.A meeting among the aquaculture cooperative members was organized at the end of tilapia crop.The main focus of the meeting was to assess the CSAq trials and potentials for wider adoption of the CSAq practices in the community. Most farmers who attended the meeting expressed their willingness to adopt the practices. Apart from increasing household income, adding tilapia also improves pond environments, and indirectly contributes to increased production efficiency of the household's farming system.However, a number of barriers for community based CSAq scaling out have been mentioned by the local farmers:(1) Lack of seed and feed source of good quality is a major constraint that limits the adoption of the CSAq in the community.(2)The current low market uptake for tilapia would result in a lower adoption rate of the CSAq practice.(3) Increased uncertainty of extreme climate events also lower farmers' incentives to invest in new techniques and practices.Climate change is threatening coastal aquaculture production systems in the NCC region of Vietnam. Finding an appropriate approach to transform production systems is crucial for ensuring food and nutrition security while reducing GHG emissions. Developing CSAq practices by integrating mono-sex tilapia into traditional integrated maricuture systems has proven to be a feasible option.The results from trials in Hoang Phong commune in Thanh Hoa province show that incorporating tilapia is a good climate change adaptation strategy, as it contributes significantly to all three CSA objectives. Stocking tilapia resulted in higher productivity and production efficiency, leading to a significant increase in household income by 14.23-42.86%. A diverse product portfolio also increases the resilience of the system when faced with changing prices or crop failure due to climate change and disease outbreaks. By utilizing natural feed sources and excessive nutrients in the farming ponds, the use of pellet feed for tilapia is reduced, resulting in lower GHGs emissions.institutions. A key factor driving adoption of tilapia integration into coastal aquaculture systems in the NCC is the market uptake. A higher rate of adoption means larger production of tilapia.Therefore, support in expanding the market for tilapia, especially the export market, will encourage the up-scaling of the integrated coastal aquaculture practice throughout the region.Other issues such as low quality fingerlings and high feed costs are also barriers to scaling up the CSAq practice. Building the linkage between feed and seed suppliers and farmers' groups should be an appropriate solution."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1479790278.json b/main/part_2/1479790278.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4b88c7ae4b57a5024f9f0bee42f133f29fff7ee --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1479790278.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5bd21434c6dea8ab5fe44f266c633015","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6c0d56a1-6816-4077-a3af-c19d986c4c11/retrieve","id":"-1381053765"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"855a11f0-1da3-42b3-a7c1-28c863206095","content":"Smallholder farmers produce majority of food in developing countries yet continue to be vulnerable to poverty, food insecurity, limited diet quality and diversity, malnutrition, and face various production challenges. Though quantitative studies have explored determinants of dietary diversity among farmers, this data can be further enriched with farmer experiences and perspectives of whether and how these factors affect dietary diversity to inform intervention design and implementation. A qualitative study was conducted among rural smallholder farmers in Kiboga district, Central Uganda with 28 participants in eight focus group discussions (four groups with men and four groups with women). The results showed that both men and women were concerned about food security and dietary diversity and viewed household food production as pivotal to food security. Purchase of food was affected by prices, household income, distance to markets and food diversity in the accessed markets. Major determinants of dietary diversity included household food production, agricultural and nutrition knowledge and awareness, information access and use, household income, and time. Poor perception towards meetings, insufficient nutrition information, skills and training were also noted. Gender influences and differences noted were concerned with allocation and use of harvested food and income within the household; more men than women having a poor perception towards meetings/trainings; and women having limited time for agricultural and nutrition practices that support dietary diversity. From the results, efforts to improve dietary diversity should address the food security and production challenges faced; support income generation whether on-or off-farm and market access to diverse foods; use designs that address gender issues and are labor and time sensitive; and include capacity building in nutrition and practices that support access to and utilization of diverse food baskets, and social behavior change strategies.In developing countries, smallholder farmers produce 60-80% of the food consumed [1]. They are however also the most vulnerable to poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition, as they face several challenges related to production, access to services, and inadequate infrastructure, knowledge, and skills. Working in a limited resource setting while facing climate change and urbanization exacerbates these challenges and their ability to cope [2][3][4]. Undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies are more prevalent in low-and lower middle-income countries, which include countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. These countries are also facing an increase in the prevalence of overnutritiona change that has been attributed to urbanization, a shift in dietary patterns with increased consumption of energy-dense, highly refined foods high in fat and sugar, and low in micronutrients, and a reduction in physical activity due to more sedentary work [5,6].In Uganda, 29% of children under five are stunted and 53% are anemic. Among adults, 24% of women and 9% of men are overweight or obese, while 32% of women and 16% of men are anemic [7]. According to the 2016 National Demographic Health Survey, only 15% of children aged six to 23 months had minimum acceptable diets and 30% consumed diets with the minimum recommended dietary diversity. Consumption of iron-rich and vitamin A-rich foods by these children was at 40% and 67% respectively [7]. The national average caloric intake is at 1883 Kcal per day per person whereby 39% are estimated not to meet their energy requirements. In addition, the quality of household diets is lacking with 40-60% of the caloric intake derived from starchy staples [8]. Regarding food security, at a national level, 26% of households face stressed food insecurity, that is, they have borderline food consumption scores (21.5-25), are employing coping strategies and are unable to afford some essential non-food expenditures without engaging in irreversible coping strategies. In addition, five percent of households face a food security crisis, whereby they have poor food consumption scores (≤21), low meal frequencies of up to one meal a day, low dietary diversity of less than three food groups, and no food stocks [9].A high-quality diet is considered to be one that provides sufficient amounts of nutrients relative to age, sex, disease status and physical activity, reduces all forms of malnutrition, promotes health, eliminates hunger, is safe, and produced sustainably. It is characterized by healthy eating habits and depends on food availability and culture [10]. Regrettably, such diets are not accessible or available to many given the two billion people globally that are food insecure, without regular access to safe, nutritious and sufficient food, the 700 million people that face severe food insecurity and possibly experienced hunger [11], and the food insecure and malnourished in Uganda highlighted above.A number of quantitative studies have explored the determinants of dietary diversity among farmers. Determinants have included income or wealth, income allocation to food, land ownership and size, access to home gardens, production diversity (the diversity of food groups produced), level of education or literacy, nutrition training or knowledge, access to media, access to water, household size, ethnicity and gender, especially the literacy, nutrition knowledge, access to markets, and occupation of women. Whereby the presence of these factors increased the likelihood of food security and dietary diversity among households [12][13][14][15][16]. This information can be further enriched with farmer experiences and perspectives of whether and how these factors affect dietary diversity through qualitative studies. Qualitative studies provide an opportunity to understand the patterns of behavior related to food and the food environment and shape key issues within the food environment that are important to farmers [17,18]. Where quantitative studies clarify the status of a situation and the cause-and-effect relationships and test hypotheses, qualitative studies are able to tease out the underlying reasons and mediators thus aiding the tailoring of interventions and messages [19,20].Qualitative reports from Tanzania have shown the importance of food security and dietary among farming households with women and children more at a disadvantage compared to men [21]. Furthermore, agriculture, agrobiodiversity, income and socio-economic status, livelihood diversity, seasonality, and household size, affected their ability to produce, purchase and consume sufficient and diverse food [21,22]. None the less, there is room for more qualitative information on farmer experiences and perspectives not only on determinants of dietary diversity but also how any limiting factors are being addressed and could be further improved. It is also important that such investigations disaggregate the gender perspectives and dynamics existing in each context.This study therefore sought to determine community and gender perspectives on nutrition and food security and dietary diversity, and their determinants among rural smallholder farming households in Central Uganda. The research questions studied were, what are the community and gender experiences and perspectives on child feeding practices, and household food availability and access? Based on the experiences and perspectives, what are the determinants of dietary diversity?A qualitative study was conducted among rural smallholder farming households from Kiboga district, in August 2018 to determine social norms and community perspectives on dietary diversity and food security. Kiboga district located in the Central region of Uganda has two main rain seasons a year with both perennial and annual production systems. The dominant production systems include agroforestry, banana-coffee, and maize farming systems. There is also livestock production mainly cattle, pigs, goats, and poultry [23]. The food security dynamics in the study sites are similar to not only the surrounding districts in the central region of Uganda, but also to smallholder farming communities elsewhere in the country and smallholder farmers in banana-based farming systems in Eastern Africa [24].Two parishes Kisweeka and Ssinde parishes were purposively selected based on relatively easy access and mobility by the researchers and the community participants, locality and distance between ensuring the two parishes were not adjacent to each other and having predominantly farming households. Within these parishes, 10 villages were randomly selected using a list of random numbers generated using Microsoft excel. A study sample size of 182 households farming households with at least one child aged between 6 and 59 months was obtained as part of a larger study [25]. From this sample of households, 12 men and 16 women participated in a total of eight focus group discussions (FGDs). Each parish had a total of four FGDs, two FGDs with men and two FGDs with women. FGDs for men and women were conducted separately. All participants had primary level education and their main occupation was farming. The average age for the eight FGDs was 39.1 ± 11.1. The average age for the men's FGDs was 44.7 ± 13.2 and that for women 35.0 ± 7.2.Using discussion guides, the FGDs explored i) the foods consumed by children aged 6 months to 3 years of age and the rest of the household, ii) the extent to which the foods consumed by children were adequate, iii) how food consumed in the household was obtained, iv) what factors determined the foods consumed, and v) how households addressed the challenges faced when accessing and consuming diverse diets. The FGDs were carried out by trained facilitators in the local language, assisted by trained note-takers. Audio recording were also made. Written informed consent to participate and record the discussion was sought from each participant prior to the start of each FGD. Communication and permission were also sought from the District officials. The study protocol was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University, Reference Number S16/06/099.The audio recordings for the FGDs and field notes were transcribed and cross-checked by the facilitators to ensure quality. The transcriptions were also cross-checked versus the audio recordings. The transcriptions were analyzed using Atlas.ti software v.8. The framework method of analysis was used to identify patterns and themes in the responses to the different questions as a way of understanding the research themes and questions [26]. This analysis involved identification of the presence or absence of themes, identification of codes informed by the themes, coding of the data, and comparison of themes and codes across the FGDs and genders. This was followed by grouping of the codes by organizing them into a matrix based on how they corresponded to the emerging themes, how they could be used to answer the research questions and how they interacted with one another.The meals served to children were reported to be largely similar to those consumed by the rest of the household. Differences between the children's diet and the rest of the household though not common practice ranged from, preparation of enriched porridges like soy flour mixed with maize or millet flour, addition of silver fish or green leafy vegetables to the bean or groundnuts sauce, purchase of eggs or milk, children accessing fruit in between meal times or mashing food for infants.Commonly consumed foods included starchy staple foods like cooking bananas, cassava, maize, rice, potatoes, and sweet potatoes. Fruits included pawpaw, mangoes, jackfruit, guavas, avocado, dessert bananas, passion fruit, gooseberries and Vangueria apiculata. Plant protein foods included beans, groundnuts, or soybean, while animal source foods included milk, eggs, and silver fish. Consumption of animal source foods like meat, milk, eggs, and fish was noted to be limited by their cost. Other foods whose consumption was influenced by their cost and household income include rice, potatoes, cooking bananas, soybean, and cooking oil.Though each FGD had participants that considered the diets of their children as adequate, some participants considered them inadequate. There were, however, more responses reflecting inadequate diets, and this was mainly attributed to limited availability and/or access to adequate food and lack of money to buy the preferred foods.When participants' understanding of adequate diets was explored, their perceptions were grouped into three categories i) Adequate diets were those that provided sufficient quantity of food leaving the children satisfied, ii) Diets were adequate if they were not monotonous and included different types of food such as milk, potatoes, and silver fish, and iii) Diets were adequate if they were well suited for children for example, food that is warm and of a texture fitting their age. For example, soft foods were said to be suitable complementary foods for children aged 6 months to 1 year and as such cooking bananas were preferred over cassava. Maize flour prepared as porridge or stiff porridge was also perceived to be good for children. Participants also acknowledged that an adequate diet is subjective because what one considers acceptable for their child may not be considered as such by another.Other perceptions around child feeding were discussed, with the most common perception being that children need to eat different and/ or tasty foods such as groundnuts, fish, eggs, milk, rice, potatoes, cooking bananas and amaranth. Secondly, that serving left over food from the previous meal especially at breakfast was a common practice that was considered inappropriate by some participants. As a result, participants preferred foods that could be warmed in the morning, but these were either not always available, or warming was not possible. Thirdly, that infants should be breastfed, and as they grow older, the feeding frequency reduces and type of food changes. Participants noted that not all women introduced foods at six months. There were no differences observed between FGDs and the men and women FGDs concerning perceptions about food and child feeding.Food was mainly sourced through four avenues, own farm production, bought from the market, gathered from the wild, and/or obtained in exchange for labor. There was a consensus from all FGDs that majority of the food consumed should be grown on their farms. Regarding buying of food, the cost of food and its availability in the market was a major influence on the type and quantity of food bought. In addition, larger markets with a variety of food stuffs were located farther from their households/villages.\"I also only buy cooking bananas, the rest of the food and vegetables I get from my garden\" [Women FGD 02] \"It depends on what foods, for example potatoes, groundnuts, maize flour, milk, watermelon, pineapples are bought from distant markets. Posho and rice are sold nearer so the distance to the market is not an issue\" [Women FGD 02] \" …. there are periods when as farmers we buy food. The main problem is change in weather; during the dry spell we all don't have food. As farmers in the village, we are not supposed to buy food like people who live in towns, but it is because of bad weather that we do.\" [Men FGD 03] Availability and consumption of animal source foods was limited and attributed to low household animal production given the high production costs, diseases, and theft. To access animal source foods, household made use of available income or sold other food items in store to obtain money to purchase these foods. A balanced diet was considered important. However, achieving a balanced diet depended on the household's ability/inability to grow and purchase the different foods. The former was the preferred scenario because the cost of foods did not allow for purchase of adequate amounts.Consumption of fruits and vegetables was strongly linked to their seasonal availability. A high consumption of vegetables during the rainy season and fruits during their specific harvest periods was reported. Participants noted that they generally made minimal effort to ensure consumption of fruits and vegetables in the off-and dry seasons. A lack of fruits and vegetables from their farms did not necessarily lead to their purchase even when income was available. Exceptions were noted among households that had farmland near swamps and those with well managed kitchen gardens because vegetables require plenty of water and are scarce during the dry season.\"No one buys fruits. We eat fruits when they are in season and are available in plenty\" [Men FGD 05] Fruit availability and consumption was also linked first to the number of fruit species and number of trees grown by a household. This was because the time of flowering differed across and within species, therefore, the larger the number of fruit species and number of trees in a household, the more likely they were to have access to fruits in different seasons/months. Secondly, fruits were an income generating crop in the community and this reduced the quantity available for home consumption. There were no differences observed between FGDs and between the men and women FGDs concerning perceptions about household food availability and access.The discussions identified five broad determinants of dietary diversity and approaches that the participants were taking or recommended to improve the situation. These were household production, agricultural and nutrition knowledge and awareness, information access and use, household income, and time.Household food production: The diversity of foods consumed was largely related to the diversity of crops grown and animals reared. Food production was in turn perceived to be influenced by land availability, soil fertility, pest and diseases and weather patterns. Household land access limited the diversity and quantity of crops grown. Access to additional land through hiring was hindered by availability of suitable land for the desired crop and the costs involved. Pests and diseases were reported to be prevalent leading to increased use of pesticides thus increasing production costs. Prolonged dry seasons and unpredictable rainfall were also increasing in occurrence, negatively affecting yield. As a result, participants noted that they needed additional income to access more land, hire labor to farm and purchase the necessary inputs such as fertilizers, manure, pesticides, and herbicides in order to increase the quantity and diversity of production.\"The land has been fragmented and is no longer enough to produce enough food. … … most families had plots of land to grow their own food, but most land has been sub-divided and sold, so some farmers do not own any …. In addition to this, our land is exhausted. For you to get a good yield, you have to spend more on fertilizers and irrigation to have a meaningful harvest\" [Men FGD 07] \"… soils used to have earth worms which help in increasing soil fertility, now because of over spraying they are no longer present in soils …. We overuse chemicals, sometimes unnecessarily …. to wipe out weeds, pests and diseases, this has led to loss of soil fertility\" [Women FGD 08] Agricultural and nutrition knowledge and awareness: Adequate information also influenced crop selection and management, and food choice and preparation. Participants reported that they were more likely to grow crops they were familiar/had experience with, those that produced/guaranteed a good yield, those that contributed to household income, and those that provided food security (alleviated hunger). These foods included maize, cooking bananas, sweet potatoes, cassava, and beans. In addition, other considerations included seasonal/annual crops vs perennial crops; crops that mature quickly or are available all year round especially in the lean season, or crops that were 'easy' to produce, that is, had lower input and labor requirements. Fast maturing crops were favored as they shortened the lean seasons. Crops that required less labor allowed more time for production of other crops or household responsibilities.\"There are some foods that most people don't see the importance of planting, like pumpkins. It's not that they don't eat these foods, but they don't see the importance of planting them in their homes\" [Women FGD 06] Despite the fact that participants mentioned the different foods that make up a diverse diet as important for meal composition, good nutrition and health, a diverse diet was viewed as consuming different types of starchy staple foods as opposed to consuming different food groups by some. This view was prevalent in four out of eight FGDs (three FGDs in Ssinde and one FGD in Kisweeka). For these participants, consumption of a diverse diet was therefore viewed as costly, a waste of time, food, and money, or impractical due to the incorrect understanding of a balanced diet by some of the participants. This highlighted the need for appropriate nutrition information.Information access and use: The skills, information and knowledge behind the practices and decisions made by the participants during production, purchase, preparation and consumption of food were mainly from family, friends and neighbors, based on experience, and from trainings, media and fellow community members that had attended these trainings. The implementation of practices however was noted to be inconsistent with many reverting to old practices after a while. This was attributed to lack of resources such as money, seeds, land, labor, and time. Laziness and/or lack of a push-factor also led to abandoning of a technique, where push factors included monitoring by projects, community extension workers or leaders.In addition, a poor attitude towards meetings and trainings where information and skills are commonly disseminated in the community was noted. That is, general community meetings and meetings and/or trainings that are regularly used by governmental and non-government organizations to disseminate information or intervene within the community. This poor attitude was reported by the women FGDs who perceived that the poor attitude in their communities to be mainly among men. This in turn affected the adoption of knowledge or practices because it requires support and input from both the man and woman within a household.Time: Production, preparation and consumption of diverse diets were reported to be hindered by time. Given the different household chores and responsibilities, there was limited time for adequate and timely production of crop diversity, preparation of balanced diets, and child and household care. Time as a factor was mentioned by only the women FGDs.\"it is true all these things require time, whatever we learn will need that you allocate time for its implementation, sometimes omitting some routine things at home which is very hard, because these routines and responsibilities are still important.\" [Women FGD 06] Household income: As earlier reported, households had challenges with purchasing different food groups especially animal source foods due to limited income and high prices. In addition, because household food production was for both food and income, participants noted that they were increasingly selling more of their agricultural produce to meet the increasing agricultural and household needs like school fees, medical bills, sundries, and pesticides. The women FGDs noted that men were more likely to sell the total crop harvests without leaving a portion of the harvest for home consumption. Women on the other hand ensured that there was always part of the harvest left for household consumption.\"… most people sell off their crops to get money to sustain their homes but it's the men who do it mostly. For us we are always thinking of our children, but men prefer to sell all …\" [Women FGD 08]The experiences around the above determinants of dietary diversity were generally similar across parishes. The exception was around adequate information. While all FGDs included participants that had an incorrect understanding of a balanced diet and its importance, this misinformation was more prevalent in Ssinde parish (2 FGDs with women and 1 men FGD) compared to Kisweeka parish (1 FGD with men). Although both genders noted lack of adequate information and limited income as some of the barriers to diverse diets, a poor attitude towards meetings and trainings particularly among men and limited time for production and utilization of diverse foods were reported only by women FGDs. Though the tradeoffs around crops harvests, especially allocation of produce for food and/or sell were mentioned by both genders, men emphasized the importance of allocating for sell while the women emphasized the importance of allocating for food.Results from the FGDs indicate that household production, agricultural and nutrition knowledge and awareness, information access and use, household income, and time were perceived as the major determinants of dietary diversity. Other determinants included distance to the market, the price and diversity of foods available in the markets and the interaction of gender dynamics and the fore mentioned determinants.Though a variety of foods were available in the community from own production and markets, meals were largely composed of starchy staples and legumes. The diets discussed corresponded with earlier reports of diets mainly composed of cereals like maize, roots and tubers like cassava, cooking bananas and beans [23,27]. While some participants considered the diets of their children to be adequate, others considered them inadequate, with varying perceptions of what an adequate diet was. Despite the perception of adequacy by some, diets of children in the study region have been reported to be lacking with only 26% meeting the minimum dietary diversity (≥4 food groups), and 13% consuming the minimum acceptable diets, values lower than national figures of 30% and 15%, respectively [7]. In addition, inadequate intakes of micronutrients, especially vitamin A, vitamin B-12, iron, zinc and calcium have been reported [28].Food was mainly obtained from own farm production and markets, with own production regarded as pivotal. Purchase of different food groups were limited by their cost and availability in the market with markets having a variety of food stuffs located farther from the participants' households/villages. Household food consumption patterns and dietary diversity are influenced by the production systems of smallholder farmers, whether crop, livestock, or mixed, and their market access [4]. In addition to providing diverse diets, production of a variety of crops has additional advantages for the smallholder farmer such as reducing risks to shocks such as poor harvests and low prices for harvests [1]. For households that are poor, have low on-farm diversity and have poor market access, such as the long distances faced by participants, production diversity has been found to have a stronger influence on dietary diversity. While for households with more income and market access, the influence of production diversity on dietary diversity reduces [29,30]. Therefore, both the productivity and production diversity and markets access of similar smallholder farmers should be addressed in order to improve their dietary diversity and food security [4,31].Consumption of fruits and vegetables was limited by seasonal availability where a lack did not necessarily lead to purchase even when income was available. Participants noted that fruit availability and household consumption was also linked to fruit diversity produced and the income potential of fruits because majority were sold. The diversity of fruits and vegetables can be leveraged to address the seasonal access challenges through agrobiodiversity assessments, targeted diversification and promotion of fruit and vegetable consumption [32,33]. In fact, improving year-round availability of micronutrient-rich fruits and vegetables by increasing the number of varieties available has been reported to increase consumption [34]. Also, an increase in household income was associated with increased demand for fruits compared to that for vegetables in Sub-Saharan Africa, as vegetables were more expensive than fruits [35]. Therefore, for the study site, such an increase in income may reduce the quantities of fruits sold, thus increasing their availability for home consumption.Household food production a major determinant, was related to the diversity of foods consumed and production was in turn influenced by land availability, soil fertility, pest and diseases and weather patterns. The production challenges noted were similar to those previously reported for smallholder farmers in Uganda and elsewhere [1,2,23,[36][37][38]. Participants in an ethnographic study in Tanzania also closely related the determinants of dietary diversity and those that affected having enough food and agricultural production [22]. This goes to show that addressing production challenges to improve the livelihoods of smallholder farmers will go a long way in improving food security and dietary diversity.Agricultural and nutrition knowledge and awareness informed the priority crops in terms of food production, consumption, and diversity. Inadequate nutrition information was also noted including a narrower and/or incorrect understanding of a dietary diversity. This knowledge gap corresponds with the agricultural and dietary practices and choices. Agricultural knowledge and income have been reported to influence input and technology use and adoption [1,39], and improving nutrition knowledge and skills has been shown to improve dietary practices [40][41][42][43]. Capacity building, and investing in different types of capital and efforts to empower communities increases the likelihood of positive impact and sustainability of interventions [44,45]. Community members have specialized knowledge and experience that can be harnessed to solve challenges, which strengthens the case for participatory approaches and context driven interventions [46,47]. Farmer, women, youth, religious and savings or loan groups within the communities and cooperatives could provide an entry point for participatory approaches, community engagement and empowerment.Information access and use was varied and a poor attitude towards meetings and trainings was noted particularly among men. This result sheds more light on the inadequate information in the study sites despite several actions by government, non-government and community-based organizations within the district. To efficiently improve the knowledge, attitude and skills in agriculture and nutrition revealed in the study, the available information access channels and existing community networks need to be maximized. Community networks and leaders could provide support to adopt and implement practices that support household food and nutrition security, thus addressing the lack of a push factor reported in this study which affected sustained adoption of learned practices and their impact. Community meetings and trainings provide an opportunity to share and receive information that can improve food security and diet quality [48]. Behavior is influenced by several factors, the perceptions and attitudes of an individual and their community, the local culture, economic environment and availability of resources [49]. Development of a social behavior change strategy can inform communication strategies, build social support, increase intervention impact, and enhance empowerment in the target community [49]. The use of several methods and channels has been found to be more effective than use of a single one, and use of a small set of method and channels is more effective than several different techniques due to inconsistent quality of delivery that can arise with several techniques [50]. Therefore, to improve information access and the effectiveness of community meetings and trainings, a social behavior change strategy with appropriate behavior change methods that utilize and/or address the how and why of determinants in this study should be developed and used.Time was a major limiting factor noted by the women, affecting production of diversity, preparation of balanced diets. Time has also been previously reported as a determinant of child feeding practices and dietary diversity [22,48]. While agricultural interventions tend to increase time commitments of the impacted household member, women are especially affected given their key role in both agriculture and nutrition. In addition, different household members (men, women, youth, children) respond to the increased time burdens and workload in different ways, which has implications on the nutrition impacts of interventions [51]. Intervention designs therefore need to assess and address such gender issues and include labor and time sensitive practices.Household income not only affected the purchase of food but also affected the quantity of harvests allocated for household consumption and its mode of allocation to address different needs. This information expounds on the food security situation in light of the food production for both food and income reported among smallholder farmers. Men were noted to sell more of the harvests thus compromising household food security and dietary diversity. This determinant also led to the sell of most if not all fruits produced. Income or wealth is a well reported determinant affecting food security and dietary diversity directly through purchasing power and indirectly by affecting agriculture and agrobiodiversity [12,22].Improving income and livelihoods of farmers is a major aim of global and national strategies whereby increasing both on-and off-farm income and improving its use among smallholder farmers has been recommended [4,31]. This has been recommended together with improving gender equity. Empowering women enhances the impact of agricultural interventions on diets and other nutritional outcomes. The impact varies with context given the different cultures, gender norms and differences in levels of empowerment. Therefore gender roles in the food environment need to be understood and harnessed in interventions to empower women and reduce any unintended negative impacts on nutrition [31,52].Both men and women were concerned with food and nutrition security and dietary diversity and viewed their household food production to be pivotal. Purchase of food was affected by the price of food stuffs particularly animal source foods, household income, distance to the market, and the diversity of food available in the markets. The major determinants of dietary diversity identified were household production, agricultural and nutrition knowledge and awareness, information access and use, household income, and time. Poor perception towards meetings, insufficient nutrition information, skills and training in the community were also noted, including a knowledge gap in the understanding and perception of dietary diversity. Gender influences and differences were concerned with allocation and use of harvests and income in the household, men having a poor perception towards meetings/trainings, and women having limited time for agricultural and nutrition practices that support dietary diversity. Efforts to improve dietary diversity should address the food security and production challenges faced and support income generation whether on-or off-farm, and market access to diverse foods. Intervention design needs to address gender issues and include labor and time sensitive practices. Capacity building in nutrition and practices that support access to, and utilization of diverse food baskets is also required. This can be enhanced by development of social behavior change strategies and further studies into knowledge sharing and access, and attitudes towards learning in households and communities to inform communication strategies, build social support, and enhance empowerment."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1488927934.json b/main/part_2/1488927934.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e32cf3b9d3893d7165ca2fbf9b360915a5eff50 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1488927934.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"89e434089d86022ae24906ab4d246956","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/68ec63db-6e9b-496f-8dd0-fbc3168011ac/retrieve","id":"1030117524"},"keywords":["A, AGUAT, AHUC, ANSM, ARIZ, ASU, BA, BAA, BAB, BACP, BAFC, BM, BR, BRIT, CAS, CHAPA, CICY, COL, CORD, CPUN, CR, CS, CUZ, DAV, DES, DS, DUKE, EBUM, ENCB, F, FI, G, GH, HAO, HNMN, HUT, IA, IBUG, IEB, INB, ISC, ITIC, K, L, LAGU, LIL, LL, LPB, M, MA, MEXU, MICH, MIN, MO, MOL, MSC, NA, NCU, NEBC, NMC, NY, O, P, PH, PMA, POM, PRG, QCA, RSA, SI, TCD, TEX, UC, UCR, US, USJ, USM, UVAL, WIS albinervus, 7 racèmes, go sèches","isotype. [MO","7-VI-2002] augusti, 3 racèmes, en go sèches, go sèche, spécimen presque défolié. [BAB","14-VIII-2010] augusti, 11 racèmes, en floraison, plusieurs racèmes arrachés, B1 3 mm long linéaires, une go verte. [x 2]. [SI","14-III-1985] Phaseolus bolivianus Piper, det. EP Killip. No. 3631. M Cardenas, Collector. /// Herbarium Cardenasianum, No. 3631, Locality near Liriuni, Cochabamba, Bolivia, [17º 17'S. 66º 18'W], 2,570 m, Habitat: grassy slopes, among bushes, climbing on Fagara coca [sic!], flowers purple lilac, vernacular name: \"frejol silvestre\", seeds flattened lilac grey, sistematic reference Phaseolus, III-946, M. Cardenas. /// United States National Herbarium. Determinavit: Phaseolus augustii Harms, det. James Lackey, augusti, 2 racèmes, en go vertes, envers des folioles avec nervures marquées, B1 2 mm long 'scale-like', pédoncule 8-12 cm, rachis 8-10 cm, 11-13 insertions/ racème. [UC","22-X-2003] Phaseolus lunatus L. var. silvester Baudet, Alfonso Delgado S., 1985. /// DGD: augusti, 5 racèmes, en floraison, jgo, go vertes, étendard glabre, bractéole 'scale-like' filiforme velue 0-nerved. [F","2-VIII-2004] lunatus, 3 racèmes, en jgo, go vertes","la taille des go indique un sauvage. [F","2-VIII-2004] lunatus, sauvage [type mésoaméricain], 7 racèmes, en floraison, jgo, go vertes, go sèches","la déhiscence spiralée indique un sauvage. [x 2]. [SI","22-IV-1988]"],"sieverID":"439bdbe8-3838-40bf-b95a-beedc3c5c88b","content":"was mutually agreed with the Editor of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas that the monograph should not exceed 300 pages. We had a lot of specimens that the two of us had seen and annotated together in Mayagüez, or separately. We agreed with the Editor that at least an identification list should be in the monograph (pages 291-294), so Curators of Herbaria would have identifications for the specimens they kindly allowed us to see. Since 2002 more Herbaria have been visited (see full list at the end of this explanatory note) by myself and more specimens have been annotated. Obviously few journals would accept the publication of these records in full. The publication of these 'note books of phaseology' on the web site of the genebank of CIAT where the largest collection of beans is currently maintained, was one way to put that information available to the public. This file is periodically updated as more visits to Herbaria increase the number of specimens of species belonging to this section.The list of specimens seen by the author in the Herbaria is organized by section of the genus Phaseolus as recognized in the monograph (op. cit.). The reason for this organization of the data is a practical one, given the numbers of specimens seen, especially for the sections including the common bean (i.e. the Phaseoli) or the Lima bean (i.e. the Paniculati). In order to provide an updated information to the users, the date of the document (at the end of the file) is the one when the data of any specimen within that section have been uploaded after the last visit to any Herbarium. Immediately behind the title is the list of Herbaria and Museums of Natural History which keep specimens of that section in their collections; such Herbaria/Museums are listed alphabetically along the acronyms of 'Index Herbariorum '. Within each section, the information is presented for each currently valid species, and in alphabetical order of the species of this section. For each species the presentation follows the alphabetical order of the countries where the species thrives naturally (the note book refers to the wild bean species/ wild forms only, not to the beans grown anywhere on purpose by people; similarly escapes from cultivation are excluded). For each country, the alphabetical order of currently acknowledged departments/ provinces/ states is followed. Within each department/ province/ state the specimens are presented by alphabetical order of names of collectors, the first family name coming first when applicable. If there are many specimens by the same collector(s), the lowest collecting numbers will come first. When there are many specimens with the same collecting number, the alphabetical order of the Herbaria keeping these specimens is followed. The specimens used as types (with indications in red and in bold face about the kind of types) immediately follow the introduction of the species name. There are two reasons for this: for the taxonomist the type contributes to the validation of the species, and if a user looks for the type(s) it will be faster to look for it (them) at a specific location in the files throughout the sections rather than to look for it (them) by geographical area. Logically the holotype comes first. The types of species put in synonymy will logically follow, in alphabetical order of the names of these species, unless they were not validly published, and in this case these specimens will be in the general list (as usually Curators of Herbaria proceed). In a few cases, the type specimens are followed by specimens for which there is no geographical information. In cases where only the country has been indicated, then the specimens will be at the top of the list before the first department/ province/ state listed alphabetically.All notes found on the voucher specimen on the day of visit are taken in the way they have been written (trying to respect the original to the extent possible), and written down along a time sequence starting with the oldest annotation (sometimes deciding which is the oldest annotation is an educated guess, but color of labels and inks and kinds of typewriters or printers help). For easy reference, the information starts with the number of the voucher with the acronym of the Herbarium visited when applicable. Please note that some Herbaria have not numbered their voucher specimens. In this case there might be only a stamp indicating where the specimen is currently kept. Each piece of information found on a label or written directly on the cardboard is separated from the next one by a slash sign repeated three times (///). Please note that a stamp might be included in the sequence of information, since it can provide useful information about the date of a specimen if this date is not indicated in the main label. The most recent labels in the sequence usually refer to the identification of the specimen by taxonomists and are presented in chronological order, the earliest identification coming first. The sequence of sets of data finishes with the author's determination (introduced by author's initials), with a few notes about the specimen. In the notes, attention is drawn on the size/ richness of the specimens, usually through the number of racemes. In view of possible future collecting (e.g. matching with the date of collection), there is an indication about the phenology, whether the specimen was seen with flowers and/ or young/ green/ dry pods and/ or seeds. The notes end with the acronym of the visited Herbarium and the date (as day/ month/ year) when the specimen was studied (that date can be validated by consulting the records of visitors of each Herbarium); so the reader knows where that specimen can be studied or asked on loan for study. A specimen might have been seen on two visits, and thus two dates will be indicated in chronological order. The indication [x2] or [x3] means that the specimen exists as two or three sheets; if there is anything noteworthy, then the second or third sheet will be treated as another specimen. Usually the data provided refer to the voucher with more useful plant parts.Because the coordinates could be critical for studies in phytogeography or in evaluation against abiotic stresses, if the coordinates were given on the (main) label, they are reported directly. If there are none and if the location is precise enough, an estimate is provided, usually for the first collecting number; because it is an indirect data provided by the author, it will be written down in square brackets []. Similarly, given its importance in order to see the material one more time in its original habitat, if provided in abbreviated form or numerical form that could lead to confusion, the date might be reconfirmed in square brackets (in format day/ month/ year), usually for the first collecting number. This confirmation is often possible because the author has explored the same area for the same species. Other notes such as appreciation/ interpretation of anything relevant on the labels will appear also in square brackets, so that the reader understands that this is not an original data. In some cases it was felt necessary to add [col.] to indicate clearly the name of the collector; similarly [det.] was added to indicate clearly the name of the taxonomist identifying the specimen. If both indications are without square brackets, it means that they were written as such on the label(s). Sometimes critical information, for example the name of the species or the collecting number might be missing and the author has seen a void space; this situation is reflected in the notes by [blanc] 'void' or without number [s. n.].For easy reference only and tracking, the name of the state/ department/ province will appear green (the black font of the original name has been turned green), and the name of the (main) collector and his/ her collecting number will appear blue (the black font of the original name has been turned blue). Note that the original black font can be reversed easily, so the user sees the original data as they were on the label(s). Similarly, all back slash signs could be eliminated to restore the original information found on the label(s).One should keep in mind that the author deals with specimens as individual cases and single sets of data, and on every visit as a novel case. This explains why specimens by the same collector(s) with the same collecting number are repeated in the list. The opinion of other taxonomists on the studied specimen is theirs, and the way Curators mounted plant parts and presented the labels is theirs too. That stated, the reader will notice some interesting convergences (or discrepancies) in the works of these different professionals.The reader will find the specimens seen by the author in alphabetical order of the species: P. acinaciformis, P. albinervus, P. augusti, P. jaliscanus, P. juquilensis, P. lignosus, P. longiplacentifer, P. lunatus, P. maculatifolius, P. marechalii, P. mollis, P. nodosus, P. pachyrrhizoides, P. polystachyus, P. rotundatus, P. salicifolius, P. scrobiculatifolius, P. sinuatus, P. smilacifolius, P. sonorensis, P. viridis and P. xolocotzii. This section seems to be the largest one of the genus right now (see T. G. Porch, J. S. Beaver, D.G. Debouck, S. Jackson, J.D. Kelly & H. Dempewolf. 2013. Use of wild relatives and closely related species to adapt common bean to climate change. , and for easiness (for example by dealing with wild P. lunatus separately) there would be many temptations to split it, for example along the subsections recognized in the monograph. For reasons beyond the scope of this notebook, the unity of the section will however be maintained in this file. In doing so, the reader will quickly realize that there are species with wide range of distribution (e.g. P. lunatus, P. polystachyus) and endemics (e.g. P. lignosus, P. nodosus).About P. acinaciformis the reader should consult the work by A. Delgado-Salinas, R. Bibler & M. Lavin. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot. 31 (4): 779-791, where it is put in synonymy of P. juquilensis. P. augusti is kept, and not P. bolivianus published later. P. lignosus is a valid species most likely belonging to this section (Debouck, D.G. 2015. Observations about Phaseolus lignosus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseoleae), a bean species from the Bermuda Islands. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 9 (1): [107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119]). In the work by Delgado-Salinas et al. (op.cit.), P. longiplacentifer is put in synonymy of P. viridis, a move pending on the study of more material. P. lunatus was treated here as in the monograph without naming botanical varieties, focusing on wild forms, with the mention of a few weedy types (namely when found in the folders of wild forms in some Herbaria); cultivated types were excluded. In many cases, since the collector(s) does (do) not clearly state the biological status of the specimen at the collection site and on the label, the specimen is confirmed as wild ('sauvage') in author's notes because this confirmation is critical for the future use of the data. P. rotundatus has been described in detail (J. Salcedo C., R. Lépiz I., N. Castañeda A., C. Ocampo N. & D.G. Debouck. 2009. Additional observations about Phaseolus rotundatus, an endemic bean species from western Mexico. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 3 (2): 751-762) and belongs to this section. P. scrobiculatifolius has been put in synonymy of P. jaliscanus (A. Delgado-Salinas, R. Bibler & M. Lavin. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot. 31 (4): 779-791), a move being kept on hold given the absence of heterophyly in the specimens seen so far. P. smilacifolius is a valid species of this section and not an hybrid between P. polystachyus and P. sinuatus as once hypothesized (Isely, D. 1990. Vascular flora of the southeastern United States. Vol. 3,part 2. Leguminosae (Fabaceae). The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 258p). updated 2-12-2019 Introducción a los 'Cahiers de Phaséologie'sección Paniculati Freytag. D. G. Debouck Programa de Recursos Genéticos Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) AA 6713 Cali COLOMBIA; d.debouck@cgiar.org NOTA ACLARATORIAMientras con el Dr. George F. Freytag estábamos finalizando la monografía (Freytag, G.F. & D.G. Debouck. 2002. Taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) in North America, Mexico and Central America. SIDA , se acordó mutuamente con el Editor del Botanical Research Institute of Texas que el texto final no debería sobrepasar el límite de 300 páginas. Teníamos muchos especímenes que habíamos examinado y anotado conjuntamente en Mayagüez, o de manera independiente. Acordamos con el Editor que por lo menos una lista de los especímenes con las identificaciones estuviera en la monografía (páginas 291-294), para que los Curadores de los Herbarios tuvieran las identificaciones de los especímenes que amablemente nos permitieron estudiar. Desde 2002 más Herbarios fueron visitados (véase una lista completa al final de esta nota aclaratoria) de mi parte y más especímenes fueron anotados. Por razones obvias pocas revistas científicas aceptarían de publicar estos registros de manera completa. La publicación de estos 'Cuadernos de Faseología' en el sitio internet del banco de germoplasma del CIAT donde se conserva actualmente la mayor colección de fríjoles, era una manera lógica de meter esta información al alcance del público. El presente archivo es actualizado periódicamente cuando nuevas visitas a los Herbarios aumentan el número de especímenes de las especies perteneciendo a esta sección.La lista de los especímenes examinados por el autor en los Herbarios viene organizada de acuerdo con las secciones del género Phaseolus tales como se las reconoce en la monografía (op. cit.). La razón detrás de esta organización de los datos es práctica, por los números de especímenes estudiados, especialmente para las secciones que incluyen el fríjol común (es decir los Phaseoli) o el fríjol Lima (es decir los Paniculati). Para dar una información actualizada a los usuarios, la fecha del documento (la cual se encuentra al final del archivo) es la fecha de la cargada de los datos de cualquier espécimen de esta sección estudiado en el último Herbario visitado. Directamente después del título se encuentra la lista de los Herbarios y Museos de Historia Natural que conservan especímenes de esta sección en sus colecciones; estos Herbarios y Museos vienen mencionados en orden alfabético con los acrónimos de 'Index Herbariorum'. Dentro de cada sección, la información se presenta por cada especie reconocida actualmente como válida, y en orden alfabético de las especies para esta sección. Para cada especie la presentación sigue el orden alfabético de los países donde esta especie crece naturalmente (este cuaderno trata únicamente de las especies y formas silvestres, no de los fríjoles sembrados a propósito por la gente en cualquier parte del mundo, tampoco figuran los escapes de cultivo). Para cada país, se sigue el orden alfabético de los departamentos/ estados/ provincias actualmente reconocidos para este país. Dentro de cada departamento/ estado/ provincia, los especímenes se presentan en el orden alfabético de los apellidos de los colectores, considerando el primer apellido cuando aplica. Si se reporta varios especímenes de un mismo colector, el reporte arranca con los números de colecta menores. Cuando hay varios especímenes con el mismo número de colecta, estos se presentan en el orden alfabético de los Herbarios (por sus acrónimos) que conservan estos especímenes. Los especímenes que fueron usados como tipos (indicados en rojo reforzado y según la categoría de tipos, el holotipo siendo el primero) se presentan directamente después del nombre de la especie. Hay dos razones detrás de esta presentación: primero, para el taxónomo el tipo es parte de la validación de la especie (y por lo tanto se sabe de cuál especie se trata), y segundo, en el caso que un usuario busca un tipo, será más rápido buscarlo en un lugar preciso del archivo (y esto para todas las secciones) en comparación a una búsqueda por área geográfica. Los tipos de las especies que fueron puestas en sinonimia siguen, en orden alfabético de los nombres de las especies, a menos que no hayan sido publicados de manera válida. En este último caso, los especímenes se ubican en la lista general (de la misma manera como lo hacen los Curadores). En algunos casos, los especímenes tipo vienen seguidos por aquellos especímenes por los cuales no hay información geográfica. En los casos donde sólo aparece el nombre del país, entonces estos especímenes vienen al inicio (en espera de más información) antes del primer departamento/ estado/ provincia mencionado en orden alfabético.Todas las notas que se encontraron escritas sobre cada espécimen en el día de la visita fueron registradas de la manera más cercana al original, y vienen reportadas en una secuencia temporal arrancando con la anotación más antigua. Decidir cuál era la anotación más antigua no fue siempre fácil, pero el color de las etiquetas y de las tintas y los tipos de máquinas de escribir y de las impresoras ayudaron. Para una referencia rápida, la información arranca con el número del ejemplar con el acrónimo del Herbario visitado cuando aplica. Hay que mencionar que algunos Herbarios no numeran sus especímenes. En este caso puede haber sólo el sello del Herbario donde el espécimen está conservado. Cada elemento de información que se encuentra escrito en una etiqueta o directamente sobre la cartulina viene separado del siguiente por una barra oblicua repetida tres veces (///). Favor notar que un sello puede ser incluido en la secuencia de informaciones porque puede dar una información útil sobre la edad de un espécimen si ésta no viene indicada en la etiqueta principal. Las etiquetas más recientes en la secuencia se refieren usualmente a la identificación del espécimen por parte de los taxónomos, y vienen en orden cronológico, la identificación más temprana siendo la primera. La secuencia de grupos de datos termina con la identificación de parte del autor (introducida por sus iniciales), con algunas notas sobre el espécimen. En estas notas, se llama la atención sobre el tamaño/ riqueza del espécimen, usualmente mediante el número de racimos. Con miras a futuras colectas y en correspondencia con la fecha de la colecta, se da una indicación de fenología, si el espécimen tiene flores y/o vainas jóvenes y/o vainas verdes y/o vainas secas y/o semillas. Las notas terminan con el acrónimo del Herbario visitado y con la fecha (en formato día/mes/ año) del estudio del espécimen durante la visita (esta fecha puede ser comprobada consultando los libros de registro de visitantes de cada Herbario). En consecuencia el lector sabe dónde un espécimen preciso puede ser estudiado o solicitado en préstamo para estudio. Un espécimen puede haber sido estudiado en dos fechas, y en consecuencia dos fechas aparecen, en orden cronológico. La indicación [x2] o [x3] significa que el espécimen existe como dos o tres ejemplares; si existe cualquier detalle que amerita ampliación de notas, entonces el segundo o tercer ejemplar será tratado como cualquier otro espécimen. Usualmente se usará el espécimen con partes más útiles/ abundantes para dar información.Porque las coordenadas geográficas pueden ser de importancia crítica para los estudios de fitogeografía o evaluación contra estrés abióticos, en el caso que las coordenadas fueron escritas en la etiqueta (principal), se las reporta directamente. Si no hay coordenadas y en el caso que el lugar de colecta esté suficientemente preciso, se dan unas coordenadas estimadas, usualmente para el primer número de colecta. Porque se trata de datos indirectos dados por el autor, estarán escritos entre corchetes cuadrados []. De igual manera, por su importancia para volver a ver el material en su sitio original, especialmente si ha sido dada de manera abreviada o en forma numérica que puede prestarse a confusiones, la fecha puede ser re-confirmada en corchetes cuadrados (en formato día/ mes/ año), usualmente para el primer número de colecta. Esta confirmación ha sido posible en varios casos porque el autor ha explorado la misma área para la misma especie. Otras notas tales como apreciaciones o interpretaciones de cualquier palabra escrita sobre la etiqueta y que sea relevante aparecerán también entre corchetes cuadrados, de tal manera que el lector entiende que no son datos originales. En algunos casos se vio la necesidad de añadir la abreviación [col.] para indicar claramente el nombre del colector de la muestra; de igual manera a veces fue necesario añadir la abreviación [det.] para indicar claramente el nombre del taxónomo quien identificó el material. En el caso que ambas abreviaciones estén sin corchetes cuadrados, esta situación significa que fueron escritas como tales en la etiqueta. A veces una información crítica, por ejemplo el nombre de la especie o el número de colecta puede estar faltando y el autor ha visto un espacio dejado en blanco; esta situación viene reflejada en las notas con la indicación [blanc] 'blanco' donde corresponde, o [s.n.] 'sin número '. Para referencia rápida solamente, el nombre del departamento/ estado/ provincia aparecerá en verde (la letra original negra ha sido cambiada a verde), y el nombre del colector (principal) y su número de colecta aparecerán en azul (la letra original negra ha sido cambiada a azul). Favor notar que la letra original negra revertirse fácilmente, para que el usuario vea los datos originales tales como estaban en la(s) etiqueta(s). De igual manera, todas las barras en oblicuo pueden ser eliminadas para volver a la información original de la(s) etiqueta(s).Es importante guardar en mente que el autor trata los especímenes como casos individuales y como conjuntos de datos por separado, y en cada visita como casos nuevos. Esta aproximación explica por qué los especímenes colectados por el mismo colector y con el mismo número de colecta se repiten en la lista. La opinión de otros taxónomos sobre el espécimen estudiado les pertenece, y la manera como los Curadores montan la muestra y presentan los datos igualmente pertenece a ellos. Bajo este entendimiento, el lector observará unas convergencias (o diferencias) interesantes en el trabajo de estos diferentes profesionales.El lector encontrará los especímenes estudiados por el autor en el orden alfabético de las especies: P. acinaciformis, P. albinervus, P. augusti, P. jaliscanus, P. juquilensis, P. lignosus, P. longiplacentifer, P. lunatus, P. maculatifolius, P. marechalii, P. mollis, P. nodosus, P. pachyrrhizoides, P. polystachyus, P. rotundatus, P. salicifolius, P. scrobiculatifolius, P. sinuatus, P. smilacifolius, P. sonorensis, P. viridis and P. xolocotzii. Esta sección parece ser la más grande en el género en estos momentos (ver T. G. Porch, J. S. Beaver, D.G. Debouck, S. Jackson, J.D. Kelly & H. Dempewolf. 2013. Use of wild relatives and closely related species to adapt common bean to climate change. , y para comodidad (por ejemplo en presentando a P. lunatus silvestre por aparte) habría buenas razones de dividirla, de acuerdo a los dos subsecciones reconocidas en la monografía. Por razones que van más allá que el ámbito de este cuaderno, la unidad de la sección se ha mantenido en este archivo. De esta manera el lector se dará rápidamente cuenta que hay especies con un rango de distribución muy amplio (e.g. P. lunatus, P. polystachyus) y otras endémicas (e.g. P. lignosus, P. nodosus).Introduction aux 'Cahiers de Phaséologie'section Paniculati Freytag. D. G. Debouck Programme de Ressources Génétiques Centre International d'Agriculture Tropicale (CIAT) AA 6713 Cali COLOMBIA; d.debouck@cgiar.orgAu moment de finir la monographie avec George F. Freytag (Freytag, G.F. & D.G. Debouck. 2002. Taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) in North America, Mexico and Central America. SIDA , un accord avait été conclu avec l'Editeur du Botanical Research Institute of Texas que la monographie ne devrait pas compter plus de 300 pages. Il y avait cependant un grand nombre de spécimens sur lesquels nous avions des observations et des notes prises soit ensemble à Mayagüez, soit séparément. Nous étions d'accord avec l'Editeur qu'au moins une liste des identifications soit présente dans la monographie (pages 291-294), afin que les Curateurs des Herbiers puissent avoir les identifications des spécimens qu'ils avaient eu l'amabilité de soumettre à notre examen. Depuis 2002 j'ai eu l'occasion de visiter d'autres Herbiers (la liste complète se trouve à la fin de cette note explicative) et de prendre des notes sur un plus grand nombre de spécimens. Pour des raisons évidentes peu de revues scientifiques accepteraient de publier ces notes dans leur entièreté. La publication de ces 'cahiers de phaséologie' sur le site internet de la banque de gènes du CIAT où la plus grande collection de haricots est actuellement conservée, était une façon de mettre ces informations à la disposition du public. Ce fichier est mis à jour périodiquement quand de nouvelles visites aux Herbiers permettent d'augmenter le nombre de spécimens des espèces appartenant à cette section.La liste des spécimens étudiés dans les Herbiers par l'auteur est organisée en suivant les sections du genre Phaseolus telles qu'elles sont reconnues dans la monographie (op. cit.). La raison pour cette organisation des données est pratique, étant donné le grand nombre de spécimens étudiés, particulièrement pour les sections qui contiennent le haricot commun (c'est-à-dire les Phaseoli) ou le haricot de Lima (c'est-à-dire les Paniculati). Dans le but de donner une information actualisée aux usagers, la date du document (qui se trouve à la fin du fichier) est celle du transfert des données de n'importe quel spécimen de cette section après la dernière visite d'un Herbier. Directement après le titre se trouve la liste des Herbiers et Muséums d'Histoire Naturelle qui conservent des spécimens de cette section dans leurs collections; ces Herbiers sont signalés en ordre alphabétique par les acronymes signalés dans 'Index Herbariorum'. Dans chaque section, l'information est présentée pour chacune des espèces actuellement valide, et dans l'ordre alphabétique des espèces de cette section. Pour chaque espèce la présentation suit l'ordre alphabétique des pays où l'espèce croît naturellement (ce cahier se réfère seulement aux espèces et formes sauvages de haricot, et non aux haricots plantés à dessein où que ce soit par les humains ; les échappés de culture sont aussi exclus). Pour chaque pays, l'ordre alphabétique des départements/ états/ provinces actuellement connu(e)s est suivi. Pour chaque département/ état/ province, les spécimens sont présentés dans l'ordre alphabétique des noms des collecteurs, le premier nom de famille étant considéré en premier lieu. Au cas où plusieurs spécimens ont été collectés par le(s) même(s) collecteur(s), les moindres numéros de collecte viennent en premier lieu. Dans le cas où plusieurs spécimens sont présents avec le même numéro de collecte, l'ordre alphabétique des Herbiers conservant ces spécimens sera suivi. Les spécimens qui ont été utilisés comme types (avec indication en caractères gras et rouges pour la nature des types) viennent directement après la mention du nom de l'espèce. Il y a deux raisons pour cette situation: pour le taxonomiste le type contribue à la validation de l'espèce (et par conséquent on sait directement de quelle espèce il s'agit), et d'autre part dans le cas où un usager cherche un type la recherche sera plus rapide si le type occupe un endroit déterminé dans les fichiers des sections plutôt que de devoir le chercher par origine géographique. Logiquement l'holotype vient en premier lieu. Les types des espèces placées en synonymie viendront ensuite, dans l'ordre alphabétique des noms d'espèces, à moins qu'elles n'aient pas été publiées de façon valide, et dans ce cas les spécimens se trouveront dans la liste générale (comme le font d'habitude les Curateurs des Herbiers). Dans quelques cas, les spécimens type sont suivis par les spécimens pour lesquels il n'y a pas d'information géographique. Dans les cas où le pays est indiqué sans plus d'information, ces spécimens suivent l'indication du pays et sont placés avant ceux avec département/ état/ province connu(e), par ordre alphabétique.Toutes les notes trouvées sur chaque planche d'herbier le jour de la visite ont été enregistrées comme elles ont été écrites, en respectant l'original le plus fidèlement possible, et ont été présentées en séquence chronologique en commençant par la note la plus ancienne. Décider quelle était la note la plus ancienne fut parfois un choix difficile, mais les couleurs des étiquettes et des encres et le type de machines à écrire ou imprimantes ont aidé. Pour une référence facile, l'information rapportée commence par le numéro de la planche d'herbier avec l'acronyme ou le nom de l'Herbier visité suivant le cas. Il faut noter que certains Herbiers ne numérotent pas leurs planches. Dans ce cas il peut y avoir seulement un cachet indiquant où le spécimen est actuellement conservé. Chaque groupe d'informations sur une étiquette ou écrites directement sur la planche est séparé du suivant par une barre oblique répétée trois fois (///). Il convient de noter qu'un cachet peut être inclus dans la séquence d'informations, car il peut apporter une information utile sur l'âge d'un spécimen si ce renseignement ne figure pas sur l'étiquette principale. Les étiquettes les plus récentes dans la séquence se réfèrent généralement à l'identification du spécimen par les taxonomistes et cette identification est présentée dans l'ordre chronologique, la plus ancienne identification venant en premier. La séquence des groupes d'informations se termine par l'identification de la part de l'auteur (introduite par ses initiales), avec quelques notes sur le spécimen. Dans ces notes, l'attention se porte sur la taille/ abondance du spécimen, mesurée d'habitude par le nombre de racèmes. En vue d'une collecte future éventuelle et en correspondance avec la date de collecte, il y a une indication de phénologie, si le spécimen provient d'une plante en floraison, et/ ou avec des jeunes gousses (jgo), et/ ou avec des gousses vertes (go vertes), et/ ou avec des gousses sèches (go sèches) et/ ou avec des graines (gr). Ces notes se terminent avec l'acronyme de l'Herbier visité et la date (en format jour/ mois/ année) de l'étude du spécimen (cette date peut être validée en consultant le registre des visiteurs de chaque Herbier). De cette façon le lecteur sait où un spécimen peut être étudié ou demandé en prêt pour étude. Un spécimen peut avoir été étudié au cours de deux visites, et par conséquent deux dates en ordre chronologique seront indiquées . L'indication [x2] or [x3] signifie que le spécimen a été trouvé monté sur deux ou trois planches; au cas où il y a quoique ce soit d'intéressant, la seconde ou la troisième planche sera considérée comme un autre spécimen. Le spécimen le plus riche en parties informatives est généralement choisi.Comme les coordonnées géographiques peuvent être de valeur critique pour des études de phytogéographie ou d'évaluation pour les stress abiotiques, si ces coordonnées ont été écrites sur l'étiquette (principale), elles seront rapportées directement. Au cas où les coordonnées sont absentes et si le lieu de collecte est suffisamment précis, une estimation des coordonnées est fournie, d'habitude pour le premier numéro de collecte; comme il s'agit d'une donnée indirecte fournie par l'auteur, cette estimation des coordonnées sera écrite entre crochets []. Pareillement, étant donné son importance pour retrouver le matériel dans son site original, la date de collecte, surtout si elle se trouve sous forme abréviée ou sous une forme qui peut prêter à confusion, peut être reconfirmée entre crochets (dans le format jour/ mois/ année), d'habitude pour le premier numéro de collecte. Cette confirmation est souvent possible parce que l'auteur a exploré la même zone géographique pour la même espèce. D'autres notes comme des appréciations ou interprétations d'écritures sur les étiquettes figureront aussi entre crochets, de sorte que le lecteur comprend qu'il ne s'agit pas de données originales. Dans quelques cas il s'est avéré nécessaire d'ajouter l'abréviation [col.] pour indiquer clairement le nom du collecteur; pareillement l'abréviation [det.] a été ajoutée pour indiquer clairement le nom du taxonomiste qui a identifié le spécimen. Si ces deux abréviations existent sans crochets, cela signifie qu'elles ont été écrites comme telles sur l'étiquette. Parfois une information critique, comme par exemple le nom de l'espèce ou le numéro de collecte, est manquante, et l'auteur a trouvé un espace blanc à cet endroit; cette situation est reflétée dans les notes par l'indication [blanc] ou [s. n.] sans numéro.Pour la facilité de référence et détection, le nom du département/ état/ province apparaîtra en vert (la lettre originale en noir a été convertie en vert), et le nom du collecteur et son numéro de collecte apparaîtra en bleu (la lettre originale en noir a été convertie en bleu). La conversion à la lettre originale en noir est facile et permet de retrouver les données originales comme sur l'étiquette. Pareillement, toutes les barres obliques peuvent être éliminées pour retrouver les informations originales trouvées sur l'(les) étiquette(s).Il convient de se souvenir que l'auteur traite chaque spécimen comme un cas particulier et chaque groupe d'informations sur une étiquette comme un groupe indépendant, et à chaque visite comme un nouveau cas. Ceci explique pourquoi les spécimens trouvés par le(s) même(s) collecteur(s) avec le même numéro de collecte sont répétés dans la liste. L'opinion d'autres taxonomistes sur le spécimen étudié est leur opinion, et la façon dont les Curateurs présentent les étiquettes et montent les matériels leur appartient également. Ceci précisé, le lecteur constatera des convergences (ou des différences) intéressantes dans le travail de ces différents professionnels.Le lecteur trouvera ci-après les spécimens étudiés par l'auteur dans l'ordre alphabétique des espèces: P. acinaciformis, P. albinervus, P. augusti, P. jaliscanus, P. juquilensis, P. lignosus, P. longiplacentifer, P. lunatus, P. maculatifolius, P. marechalii, P. mollis, P. nodosus, P. pachyrrhizoides, P. polystachyus, P. rotundatus, P. salicifolius, P. scrobiculatifolius, P. sinuatus, P. smilacifolius, P. sonorensis, P. viridis and P. xolocotzii. Cette section semble être la plus grande du genre actuellement (voir T. G. Porch, J. S. Beaver, D.G. Debouck, S. Jackson, J.D. Kelly & H. Dempewolf. 2013. Use of wild relatives and closely related species to adapt common bean to climate change. , et par convenance (par exemple en traitant la forme sauvage de P. lunatus séparément) la tentation existe de diviser la section, en suivant les soussections reconnues dans la monographie. Pour des raisons dont le détail n'est pas l'objet de ce cahier, l'unité de la section est maintenue dans ce fichier. De cette façon, le lecteur comprendra rapidemment qu' il y a des espèces avec une grande zone de distribution (e.g. P. lunatus, P. polystachyus) et des espèces endémiques (e.g. P. lignosus, P. nodosus).A propos de P. acinaciformis, le lecteur devrait consulter le travail de A. Delgado-Salinas, R. Bibler & M. Lavin. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot. 31 (4): 779-791, où il est mis en synonymie de P. juquilensis, une action en attente de pouvoir étudier plus de spécimens. P. augusti est conservé, et non P. bolivianus publié par après. P. lignosus est une espèce valide le plus probablement appurtenant à cette section (Debouck, D.G. 2015. Observations about Phaseolus lignosus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseoleae), a bean species from the Bermuda Islands. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 9 (1): 107-119). Dans le travail de Delgado-Salinas et al. (op.cit.), P. longiplacentifer est placé en synonymie de P. viridis, une action en attente de pouvoir étudier plus de matériel. P. lunatus a été traité comme dans la monographie sans faire de distinction entre les variétés botaniques, en se concentrant sur les formes sauvages, avec la mention occasionnelle de quelques formes rudérales (notamment si ces spécimens se trouvaient confondus avec les formes sauvages dans les mêmes casiers des Herbiers); les plantes cultivées ont été exclues. Dans plusieurs cas, quand le collecteur n'a pas clairement défini le statut biologique du spécimen au site de collecte et sur l'étiquette, le spécimen a été confirmé comme 'sauvage' dans les notes de l'auteur du fait de l'importance de cette information pour l'usage ultérieur des données. P. rotundatus a été décrit en détail par ailleurs (J. Salcedo C., R. Lépiz I., N. Castañeda A., C. Ocampo N. & D.G. Debouck. 2009. Additional observations about Phaseolus rotundatus, an endemic bean species from western Mexico. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 3 (2): 751-762) et appartient à cette section. P. scrobiculatifolius a été mis en synonymie de P. jaliscanus (A. Delgado-Salinas, R. Bibler & M. Lavin. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot. 31 (4): 779-791), une action en réserve pour le moment du fait de l'absence d'hétérophylie sur les spécimens étudiés jusqu'à présent. P. smilacifolius est une espèce valide de cette section et non un hybride entre P. polystachyus et P. sinuatus comme il a été proposé une fois (Isely, D. 1990. Vascular flora of the southeastern United States. Vol. 3,part 2. Leguminosae (Fabaceae) Herbario de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. No. [blanc]. Det. [blanc]. N.v. \"poroto del zorro\". Det. A Burkart, I-1941. Argentina, Jujuy, Valle Grande. [23º 28'S. 64º 59'W]. Selva. Leg. Arturo Burkart & Nélida S Troncoso. 28-II-1940[28 février 1940]. Aug. 3, 1915Aug. 3, [3 août 1915]] Col. César Vargas C.. Fecha Febrero 1935[? février 1935]. [Peru, Cuzco]. Provincia Paucartambo. Loc. riberas , aproximadamente 6 km de Atenguillo. Alt. 1,900 m. 20º22'20.79\"N,104º36'9.73\"W. Bosque de pino-encino. Hierba rastrera abundante, flor morada. Mayo 13, 2017Mayo 13, [13 mai 2017]]. Col 26, 1904;fr. Feb. 4, 1905 [en No. 5380. 27 Nov. 1978[27 novembre 1978]. Family: [blanc]. Phaseolus Oct. 27, 1947Oct. 27, [27 octobre 1947;;écrit "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1490659829.json b/main/part_2/1490659829.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..047d73fe4a2c89c97c58cf6ca17867eabdcb5d7f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1490659829.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7757d76fb626be4c93e1c7e72b7e5fc8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fb251f79-ba26-4c1e-a19a-ec892bdca62a/retrieve","id":"1029833935"},"keywords":["Launaea cornuta","tissue culture","micropropagation","axillary buds","tissue culture"],"sieverID":"7fa59ef3-d7c1-41ae-bd7b-babde709bc09","content":"An efficient micropropagation protocol was developed for the medicinal plant Launaea cornuta using green house axillary buds as explants. The best sterility was obtained at 30% (v/v) local bleach (JIK). Maximum shoot induction rate was achieved when axillary buds were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) Media supplemented with 0.5 mg/L of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) for 3 weeks. The highest number of shoot multiplication was obtained when induced shoots were culture on MS media supplemented with 0.5 mg/L BAP and 0.2 mg/L NAA for 30 days. The best rooting response with regard to average root length, rooting percentage and number of roots was achieved within 4 weeks of culture of excised shoots on MS media having 0.5 mg/L BAP. Regenerated plants were successfully acclimatized and about 80 to 90% of plantlets survived under ex vitro conditions. About 170 plants were produced from a single nodal bud of L. cornuta after 60 days. A reproducible protocol was established for in vitro propagation of L. cornuta, an important indigenous vegetable with high medicinal value.Launaea cornuta commonly known as bitter lettuce or \"mchunga\" is a wild vegetable belonging in the family Asteraceae. It is indigenous to Kenya, Uganda, Malawi, Tanzania, Mozambique and Zimbabwe where it is mainly used as a vegetable (Jeffrey, 1966;Schippers, 2002), fodder for rabbits and sheep and to increase milk yield in cows (Burkill, 1985). It is rich in nutrients such as proteins, fat, carbohydrates, calcium, phosphorus, iron and ascorbic acid (Ndossi and Sreeramulu, 1991). It is exploited for its antidiabetic, anticancer, insecticidal (Kareru et al., 2007), antimalarial, antibacterial (Musila et al., 2013) and anthelmintic (Hiene and Heine, 1988) properties. It has been used to treat gonorrhea, syphilis, sore throats, coughs, typhus, nasal-pharyngeal infections, measles, swollen testicles, pain in the spleen, ear aches, hookworm eradication as well as fever (Hiene and Heine, 1988). L. cornuta is locally propagated vegetatively through rhizomes (Abukutsa, 2007). Development of a micropropagation protocol for L. cornuta can help to promote its cultivation and domestication which is currently limited to the coast of Kenya and countries bordered by the coast line (Abukutsa, 2007). The aim of this study was to regenerate L. cornuta in vitro using nodal buds as explants. A micropropagation protocol is essential for rapid multiplication, utilization and conservation of L. cornuta.Launaea cornuta plants were collected from the field and planted in sterile soil in plastic bags and placed in the screen house at Kabete Biotechnology Center of Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO). The plants were watered whenever necessary. All experiments were conducted using MS basal media (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) supplemented with 20 g/L sucrose and 3 g/L phytagel. The media was sterilised by autoclaving at 121°C for 20 min and dispensed equally into 10 ml universal bottles. Explants were cultured at a temperature of 24 ± 2°C and a photoperiod of 16/8 h light and dark conditions. Lighting conditions were provided by cool-white fluorescent lights of 3000 Lux.Shoots from green house grown plants were cut just above the soil surface using clean scalpels and placed in bags (Figure 1). Shoots were defoliated in the tissue culture laboratory and individual 3 cm long shoot buds (explants) excised. Twenty one explants were placed into 5 different jam jars and rinsed 3 times with distilled water containing 3 drops of tween-20. This was followed by rinsing to remove the soap and addition of local bleach (JIK with 3.85% NaOCl) at 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30% into the jars for 20 min. The bleach was discarded and 70% ethanol added for 2 min. They were thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and held in 2% bleach solution awaiting culture. The dead tissues at the edges of the explant were cut off and the buds inoculated in MS media. The cultures were incubated under conditions described previously and the rate of explant survival and sterility for each bleach concentration recorded 30 days after culturing.Explants were inoculated on the MS medium supplemented with BAP at 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L. The explants were cultured under conditions described previously and data on number of shoots per explants and shoot length recorded 3 weeks after culture. After 3 weeks of culture, the induced shoots were subcultured on MS media supplemented with 0.5 mg/L BAP in combination with NAA (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 mg/L). The cultures were incubated under growth conditions described previously. The shoots developed in the culture jars were maintained for 4 weeks and monitored for continuous elongation. Each NAA concentration was evaluated for shoot proliferation and growth.Shoots were subcultured into MS media containing IBA at 0, 01, 0.5 and 1 mg/L and maintained for 4 weeks under growth conditions described previously. The number of roots and root length was determined for each IBA concentration. Shoots with a welldeveloped root system were hardened in the glass house for 7 days by growing in sterile peat moss. Hardened plants were transplanted into soil and monitored until maturity.Explant surface sterilization is mandatory and it serves to eliminate epiphytes and transient microorganisms. It is therefore important that the concentration of the sterilant be high enough to effectively kill all contaminants but low enough to avoid damaging the explants. To date, establishment of tissue culture for L. cornuta has not been reported. It is therefore not clear how the hollow stem sections of L. cornuta would respond to surface sterilization. To obtain the best sterilant concentration, we compared the effect of five different concentrations of NaOCl on sterility and shooting of nodal explants. The optimum concentration was 30% bleach, resulting in the highest sterility and number of shooting nodal explants (Table 1). At lower bleach concentrations the explants were greened. However, they did not shoot due to associated high rate of contamination. Bleach levels exceeding 30% caused scorching and eventual death of the explants (Table 1). The tissue available for isolation for microculture is an important factor that can influence the success rate of tissue culture. Vegetative tissues from plants growing outside have relatively high contamination making surface disinfection difficult. The ideal tissue is obtained from a small plant maintained in a relatively clean environment such as glass house. In this study, exposure to 30% of local bleach for 20 min was adequate to disinfect explant tissues obtained from glass house grown plants.Currently there are no reports on the in vitro response of any genotype of L. cornuta. To establish in vitro axillary shoot induction response of L. cornuta axillary buds, the effect of different BAP concentrations was compared.Multiple shoots were best induced on low BAP (0.5 mg/L), resulting in 11 shoots per axillary bud (Figure 1) after 3 weeks. Increasing the concentration of BAP to 1.5 mg/L resulted in a substantial reduction of shoot formation to 8.6 shoots per bud. Shoot length was significantly reduced when BAP level was reduced below 0.5 mg/L. However, increasing the BAP concentration beyond 0.5 led to statistically insignificant reduction (p>0.05) in shoot length (Table 2). In many plant species, dormant axillary buds are induced to sprout into plants using cytokinins. For L. cornuta, presence of low BAP (0.5 mg/L) is paramount for efficient shoot induction. This is because shoots were produced at a significantly higher rate (p<0.05) for all media having BAP than for the control MS basal media lacking BAP (Table 2). New growth from nodal sections of L. cornuta was apparent in about 2 weeks of culture on media having 0.5 mg/L BAP. However, the new shoots elongated in 2 to 3 weeks. Emergence of new axillary buds (shoots) is dependent not only on explant type and hormone concentration, but also on other factors including hormone type, media composition, explant age and position.To test the ability of induced axillary shoots to proliferate, the effect of different BAP:NAA combinations on the number of shoots and shoot growth was evaluated. Media having BAP in combination with NAA gave an excellent shoot proliferation rate (Table 3). The highest number of shoot multiplication was obtained when media was supplemented with 0.5 mg/L BAP and 0.2 mg/L NAA (Figure 1). Favorable effects of these growth regulator combinations on shoot proliferation response has also been reported for several medicinal plants, such as, Celastrus paniculatus (Martin, 2006); Coleus blumei (Rani et al., 2006) and Smilax zeylanica L. (Sayeed and Roy, 2004). The regenerated shoots were healthy and attained a height of 4.6 cm within 4 to 6 weeks on media having 0.5 mg/L BAP and 0.2 mg/L NAA (Table 3). These shoots were normal and rootable.After six weeks of culture of elongated shoots on hormone-free MS basal medium, the rooting response of media with different concentration of IBA was tested on excised shoots. Roots formed on shoots within 4 weeks of culture on all media with IBA (Figure 1). However, the root number and length decreased with decreasing IBA concentration. The best rooting response with regard to the percentage of shoots producing roots (100%), the number of roots per shoot (7.3) and the average root length (3.3 cm) was achieved with 0.5 mg/L BAP (Table 4). Similar effects of IBA on root induction of shoots have been observed in other medicinal plants, such as Solanum trilobatum (Jawahar et al., 2004). Cassia alata (Hasan et al., 2008) and Plumbaga zeylanica (Chaplot et al., 2006). The rooted plants were hardened and transferred to soil where they grew normally with no morphological abnormalities.This study established for the first time a micropropagation protocol for L. cornuta using axillary buds as explants. About 170 plants were produced from a single nodal bud after 60 days. The protocol described here can be used for rapid propagation, conservation of and exploitation of L. cornuta germplasm for their nutritional and medicinal value."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1493121263.json b/main/part_2/1493121263.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f2ec5cf63a17b0a5771307f5510f6f47c0b96876 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1493121263.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"794e6c4e0186fde28c31e4bee8ba2dda","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b83fd794-1e0e-473c-9a46-5efd9e66a84e/retrieve","id":"-1171349114"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1b45895a-62da-4ba4-aef6-0b60631f1860","content":"Mediterranean firs are inter-fertile species that belong to two sections: i) Section Abies (Abies bornmuelleriana Mattf., A. borisii-regis Mattf., A. cephalonica Loud., A. equi-trojani Asch., A. nebrodensis Lojac and A. nordmanniana Spach.), and ii) Section Piceaster (Abies cilicica de Lannoy, A. marocana Trabut, A. numidica Carrière and A. pinsapo Boissier). They are evergreen conifers growing up to 50 m in height, with straight trunk and pyramidal crown that later turns to flat-topped. The 3-5 vegetative buds, at the apex of the shoots, are conical to ovoid and resinous (except in A. cilicica, A. nordmanniana and A. numidica). Leaves are linear, flattened with acute (A. cephalonica, A. borisii-regis, A. equi-trojani and A. pinsapo) or round (A. cilicica, A. nebrodensis, A. nordmanniana and A. numidica) apex.The firs are obligate seeders, monoecious and wind-pollinated and their seeds are wind-dispersed. The cones ripen in one season, while abundant seed production occurs only every 3-5 years.They form pure or mixed forests that span a considerable altitudinal range (600-2000 m) and grow in humid bioclimates, except for A. cephalonica, A. cilicica and A. nebrodensis that may also grow in sub-humid regions. A. borisii-regis, A. bornmuelleriana, A. cephalonica and A. cilicica can tolerate wider ranges of mean annual temperature (7.5 to 16 ºC) than the rest of the species. Bud bursting occurs from early April (A. cephalonica and A. cilicica), mid April (A. marocana, A. numidica and A. pinsapo) to early May (A. bornmuelleriana and A. nordmanniana).These Technical Guidelines are intended to assist those who cherish the valuable Mediterranean fir genepool and its inheritance, through conserving valuable seed sources or use in practical forestry. The focus is on conserving the genetic diversity of the species at the European scale. The recommendations provided in this module should be regarded as a commonly agreed basis to be complemented and further developed in local, national or regional conditions. The Guidelines are based on the available knowledge of the species and on widely accepted methods for the conservation of forest genetic resources.Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and useMediterranean firs P.G. Alizoti 1 , B. Fady 2 , M.A. Prada 3 , G.G. Vendramin 4 1 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 2 INRA, URFM, Ecology of Mediterranean Forests, Avignon, France 3 GV, CIEF-Forest Seed Bank, Valencia, Spain 4 IGV-CNR, Florence, ItalyMediterranean firs have disconnected and limited distributions that are relict ranges of mostly endemic species. The distribution area of most fir species is concentrated in the eastern Mediterranean and the Black Sea region.Fir wood is generally considered of lesser technical value than pine wood, but is used for carpentry purposes due to its softness and workability. It is also used for general construction, paper, glued and composite wood products, veneer, plywood, panels and poles, as well as fuel wood. The bark, buds and cones may contain a large amount of fine, highly resinous turpentine. A fine oil of turpentine can be distilled from the crude material, while the residue forms a coarse resin named colophony or rosin. Fresh oleoresin is mainly used for pharmaceutical purposes.Because of their fragrance, colour, good form and exceptionally long leaf retention after being cut, most of the firs are used as ornamental trees and are grown in plantations for Christmas trees (e.g. A. borisii regis, A. cephalonica and A. nordmanniana).Mediterranean firs are often found in protected areas either because of their level of endemism and limited distribution or because of their vital role as keystone species in Mediterranean mountain ecosystems. pp Abies spp A Threats to genetic diversity editerranean firsAbies spp Mediterranean firsAbies spp Mediterranean firsAbies s Due to the threats, endemism and geographically scattered distribution, the conservation of Mediterranean firs and their genetic resources is a major challenge. The genetic resources of the firs are currently conserved in various protected areas that have rarely been established for this purpose. Due to their evolutionary history and specific adaptation, the fir forests harbour unique genetic resources that are important beyond the Mediterranean. Thus, the establishment of conservation units for the firs that meet pan-European minimum requirements for dynamic gene conservation is of crucial importance.At present, several of the species and their genetic resources are protected either in situ (national parks, nature reservesand gene conservation units) or ex situ (conservation seed orchards and stands). is conserved in a nature reserve in Morocco and seven ex situ stands have also been established for the species.Climate change will have an impact on the current in situ conservation efforts but it is difficult to predict its effect on seed production, natural regeneration and recruitment of the firs as well as on the risks from insects and pathogens. The dynamic gene conservation units should be monitored in order to ensure that the populations are not seriously affected and that they retain their evolutionary potential and regenerate naturally. Management of the units should aim mainly at assisting natural regeneration and when this is not possible, the area should be artificially regenerated with local genetic material. Management of natural forests should also safeguard genetic resources by allowing natural selection to occur on regeneration in a variety of situations. Ex situ conservation efforts should focus on small populations that have an endangered status, insufficient seed production or unsuccessful pollination in their natural environment. This approach is useful especially in case of rare species or species with limited or scattered distribution as ex situ stands with a sufficient number of genotypes form new interbreeding populations that will produce seeds with a potentially high genetic diversity. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1494290301.json b/main/part_2/1494290301.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf8f408ea8d0c8a7d691659c416ee8572d76cda5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1494290301.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b07c5de969e007b7ca169a171c56bb7e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8370b24b-2ef7-4c06-b4cb-76a2f8b47395/retrieve","id":"-1530899903"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c4c60cd2-a7c7-49a6-8521-12a4be4975bd","content":"sobre las 80+ especies del género, más ½ son endémicas, allí vienen las nuevas Con amplia distribución: poblaciones > 100, varios nichos Con distribución intermedia: 25 < poblaciones < 100 Con distribución endémica: < 25 poblaciones, nicho específico ejemplo de especies con amplia distribución en Suramérica: aug, lun, vul 3/28• género: 80-85 sp.• 2 clades de ~40 sp. c/u• género: 8 mi años• separación de 2 clades: 4 mi años • siembra silvestres• afuera rango silv.• flujo genes → razas • 15% de las especies silvestres han sido descubiertas después de 2000; endémicas!• es en Mesoamérica que la probabilidad de encontrar estas endémicas es mayor Prioridades de Conocimiento Adicional (26/XI/2019) (1)• en Mesoamérica falta trabajo en:• México para las extintas (!?) (leptophyllus, placiocylix) y otras 4 spp.• Guatemala para P. parvifolius, P. pauciflorus, P. persistentus • Venezuela para silvestres de P. lunatus y de P. vulgaris• Brasil, Bolivia y Paraguay para silvestres de P. lunatus• en Suramérica falta trabajo en:• en las transiciones: Colombia (3), Amotape-Huancabamba, Salinas Grandes• Honduras ameritaría un trabajo como lo de Costa Rica (de 7 a 15sp.!)• inventario del material no comercial, con marcadores y georeferenciación• Venezuela para guacaro y murutungo Prioridades de Conocimiento Adicional (26/XI/2019) (2)• Brasil, Bolivia y Paraguay para formas cultivadas de P. lunatus• en Mesoamérica falta trabajo en:• en Suramérica falta trabajo en:• Corredor seco centroamericano tepari • todas las especies silvestres por la diversidad genética acumulada por 8 mi años• en Mesoamerica son de gran interés 6 especies del grupo de P. vulgaris• en los Andes son de gran interés 2 especies del grupo de P. vulgaris y• en ambas regiones son de gran interés los flujos entre variedades y y 3 especies del grupo de P. lunatus sigue domesticando dentro de estos flujos génicos entre estas y especies y formas silvestres , sobre todo los casos donde la gente aún• es urgente hacer inventarios en parques nacionales para ver si tienen parientes de Phaseolus• una meta modesta sería que una población de cada especie esté en un área protegida "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1495751765.json b/main/part_2/1495751765.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a704e8146eb7b29cc9d0f4f13d2f2594cbb3b820 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1495751765.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3620bff11a868516dd232fc820330b8e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/972a4941-dd26-49c5-b144-a529085d2ddf/retrieve","id":"182461798"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"27ae6a2a-06b2-4b6b-8d53-6427b668a195","content":"La investigación partlcipatlva para el mejoramiento de la yuca (IPMY) se desarrolló, en un ptincipio, como un procedimiento aplicado al trabajo de evaluar clones de yuca (Manlhot esculenta. Crantz) que se hacia con agricultores de escasos recursos del departamento del Cauca y de la Costa Atlántica de Colombia. El método fue creado entre 1986 y 1991 por el CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical), con la colaboración de CORPOICA (Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria), y partia de métodos y técnicas participativas ya existentes a las que se adicionaron nuevos componentes dispuestos en forma secuencial (Herné.ndez 1993J. Varias instituciones de países latinoamericanos lo han ensayado y lo adoptaron en sus programas de mejoramiento, tanto de la yuca (Fukuda et al. 1994(Fukuda et al. , 1997;;Hinostroza et al. 1988; Iglesias y Herné.ndez sO como de otros cultivos.El método IPMY se desarrolló durante una coyuntura en la que el enfoque participativo ganaba espacio y credibilidad entre los investigadores agricolas y se empezaba a aplicar al mejoramiento de cultivos, de donde recibió el nombre genérico de fttomejoramiento participativo, FMP (o PPB, sus siglas en inglés). El número de proyectos de FMP se multiplicó desde los 80 y actualmente hay. por lo menos. 75 casos documentados en Asia. África y América Latina (Weltzlen et al. 2000). Estos proyectos han empleado varias modalidades y métodos de participación y son. en conjunto, una fuente de experienCias. de lecciones y de elementos clave que pueden ser consultados por los investigadores que deseen desarrollar un proyecto o refinar sus procedimientos.El propósito de este articulo es analizar criticamente el procedimiento IPMY y sus componentes en relación con lo aprendido de su aplicación (en el Cauca y en la Costa Atlé.ntica de Colombia). y considerando las lecciones que se pueden derivar de la multitud de experiencias realizadas en FMP a nivel mundial en los últimos 20 años.En primer lugar. el procedimiento IPMY se presenta gráficamente en secuencias. explicando brevemente sus componentes intrínsecos y coníextuales. Luego se analizan cuatro temas relacionados con los resultados obtenidos y con aspectos que no fueron considerados origJ.nalmente; sin embargo. la experiencia conjunta del FMP sugiere que pueden tenerse en cuenta para Incluir en el procedimiento una vez refinados o modificados. Se explicará que varias de las decisiones sobre aspectos clave de un proceso participativo -{:omo son la selección de participantes o la etapa (o etapas! del proceso en que se Incorporan los usuarios--se toman en función del objetivo del proceso; por ello, en la medida en que cambien los objetivos, pueden varlar también estas decisiones.Aunque existen varios documentos sobre el procedimiento IPMY, sobre la aplicación que se le ha dado en varios paises y sobre la capacitación tmpartida para poder manejarlo. al momento de escribir este articulo no se conocen documentos suficientemente detallados del IPMY como tal, que pennitan un análisis critico de sus componentes y de sus pasos. Una explicación parcial de esta situación es que el IPMY se elaboró cuando se Implementaba un proyecto de mejoramiento en la Costa Atlántica, una reglón al norte de Colombia, yen sus comienzos introdujo algunas modificaciones al método convencional empleado hasta entonces tanto en el programa nacional de :yuca como en el CIAT. Por ello, algunos de los programas de mejoramiento que han deseado aplicar el IPMY han tenido que deducir prácticas y crear pasos que o no fueron contemplados quizás durante la expertencia colombiana o, si lo fueron, no llegaron a ser documentados.La Figura 1 presenta un esquema del procedimiento empleando documentos y matertales disponibles. El esquema se divide en elementos contextuales, es decir. elementos que hemos considerado como propios o únicos del contexto colombiano en el cual se desarrolló el procedimiento; y en pasos sugeridos. o sea, pasos esenciales que deben implementarse, prescindiendo del contexto, cuando se quiera replicar el procedimiento.Estos elementos, que cambian según el contexto en que se realiza un procedimiento participativo, influyen en el modo en que se implementan los pasos sugertdos y en los resultados que se logren. En la experiencia colombiana. los elementos contextuales más importantes fueron los actores y el cultivo.En la experiencia colombiana hubo diversos actores: instituciones de investigación agricola (nacional e internacional), universidades. cooperativas, organizaciones no gubernamentales (las ONG). pequeñas industrias de procesamiento de la raíz de yuca, y pequeños productores. Estaba también el GRUYA (Grupo de Yuca y Asociados). una agrupación de profesionales de diferentes instituciones y con diversas especializaciones, experimentados en el cultivo de la yuca. que se reunia pertódicamente para compartir expertencias, planear actividades y dar mutuamente asesoria en diversos temas relacionados con el cultivo.La participación del GROYA facilitó mucho el trabajo y fue una garantía de que importantes aspectos del cultivo no quedaran excluidos a la hora de implementar o ejecutar el proyecto. El GROYA facilitó también la interacción con los productores de yuca y se aseguró de que los ensayos tuvieran suficiente cubrimiento geográfico. Este punto pertenece al tema de la concertación intértnstituclonal que será analizado más adelante.No sólo las relaciones existentes entre las entidades. sino también la identidad de los actores prtncipales, los mandatos que han recibido. sus prtncipios. sus objetivos y su método de trabajo fueron elementos contextuales importantes. En el contexto colombiano. por ejemplo. el eIAT. una de las entidades investigadoras del proyecto. tenia un doble objetivo: desarrollar un procedimiento de FMP y crear en las entidades asociadas con el Centro la capacidad de replicar ese procedimiento. Estos objetivos incluian las siguientes actividades y estrategias:capacitación continua de profesionales. creación de vínculos interinstitucionales.contratación de una persona para el trabajo específico de preparar y documentar el procedimiento.elaboración de un presupuesto.centralización de la infonnación.inicio estratégico del trabajo aplicando el esquema convencional.empleo de materiales en fase avanzada de mejoramiento que eran (y son aún muy importantes en la experiencia colombiana (aunque no necesariamente en la de otros paises). y modificación del procedimiento para ajustarlo a otros cultivos.La identidad de los productores es también un elemento contextualimportante. Los productores pueden considerarse un elemento intrinseco del procedimiento. tal como uno de sus pasos (\"Selección de los agricultores\") lo sugiere: sin embargo. conviene destacar que la identidad y la situación socio-económica del productor varian según el contexto. Como se explicará más adelante. la mayor parte de los agricultores que viven en la reglón donde se estableció el proyecto son pequeños productores (generalmente. poseen de 0.5 a 1 ha). todos hombres. con mucha experiencia en la producción de yuca. de la cual el mayor porcentaje se destina al autoconsumo y a la venta en fresco. Aunque exiSten otras subregiones y otros perfiles socio-económicos dentro de la región considerada. éstos fueron elegidos por el proyecto dado el mandato y los objetivos de las entidades que lo ejecutaban.Mucho se puede deducir del nombre del procedimiento que estamos analizando. El nombre \"investigación participativa para el mejoramiento de la yuca (IPMY)\" indica que el procedimiento fue desarrollado específicamente para el cultivo de la yuca. lo que ocurrió así por motivos circunstancIales. La estrategia de mejorarmento. el tipo de selección. el diseño experimental. la estructura de las repeticiones. el tiempo. el espacio y los recursos requeIidos en el procedimiento son propios del cultivo de la yuca. pero variarán. naturalmente. cuando se trate de otros cultivos. La secuencia de pasos que sugiere este procedimiento ha sido aplicada. sin dificultad. a otros cultivos.El cultivo de la yuca es también un elemento importante en el contexto colombiano porque es un cultivo de subsistencia. muy extendido en el área abarcada por el proyecto y tradicional en ella. Este hecho facilitó el establecimiento del procedimiento participativo, dada la larga experiencia y los conocimientos que tienen los agricultores de la Costa Atlántica sobre este cultivo. El trabajo con cultivos en que los agricultores carecen de experiencia (por ejemplo. en pastos o variedades de cobertura del suelO) y en que no es posible apreciar cualitativamente. a corto plazo. los beneficios de la tecnología (por ejemplo. la conservación del suelo o la digestibilidad y el contenido de proteína en el caso de los forrajesl representaría un reto diferente. y más dificil. para el investigador.Los pasos que se darían. de manel'a secuencial. en el procedimiento IPMY son los siguientes:,/ Definir los objetivos. Las entidades que participan en el procedimlento IPMY establecen los objetivos de éste antes de iniciarlo. (Este tema será discutido más adelante.),/Elegir los agricultores y las localídades (y establecer una red de ensayos del cultivo). Hay técnicas participativas que orientan en la elección de los productores. la cual se basa en los diversos criterios de selección establecidos por las entidades antes mencionadas. (Este tema sera discutido más adelante.)./Hacer el díagnóstico parttcipativo. Este diagnóstico identifica. inicialmente. los problemas o las limitaciones de los participantes en IPMY. y sus objetivos ../Seleccitmar los materiales. Los materiales que se evaluarán (oferta tecnológica) se seleccionan primero según la descripCión de la variedad \"ideal\" y. después del primer ciclo, por los criterios de los productores.,/Hacer evaluaciones abiertas (irúormaci6n subjetiva) y evaluaciones agron6micas (irúormación cuantitativa) para recolectar irúormación que será luego analizada.,/ Determinar criterios y elaborar un glosario de términos. empleando formularios de evaluación y haciendo un análisis subjetivo de la irúormaci6n.,/Usar libros de campo como fonnato para las tablas de frecuencias en las que se determina la importancia relativa de los criterios expresados por los agricultores.,/Analizar estadísticamente la información obtenida. aplicando el análisis de regresi6n a la irúormación no paramétrtca (la calidad de la irúormaclón y el uso que se le da se analizan más adelante).,/ Defrnir la fase de pre/anzamtento. Esta tarea corresponde a las entidades de investigación que participan.,/ Liberar las variedades desarrolladas. La liberación se hace según las normas de las entidades de investigación mencionadas.En esta sección analizaremos cuatro temas clave de la investigación participativa: la selección de participantes. la definición de objetivos. el análisis de la información. y la realización de acuerdos intertnstitucionales. En cada tema o área se estudiará lo que sugiere la documentación existente sobre IPMY. la forma en que se manejó el tema durante la experiencia realizada en Colombia. los aspectos relacionados con ese tema que no se consideraron y. fmalmente. la forma en que se puede refmar el procedimiento dadas la experiencia adquirida y el aprendizaje logrado en FMP a nivel internacional en los últimos 20 años.En la: experiencia colombiana. la selección de agricultores en las comlUÚdades fue coordinada por las instituciones de investigación. las cuales designaron funciOnarios que conocían los sistemas de producción de las localidades. Estos funcionarios seleccionaban agricultores expertos de comunidades situadas en zonas edafoclimáticas similares a la zona en que se hallaba la estación experimental. y en las cuales la yuca era un cultivo prioritario (Iglesias y Hernández 1994).En cada localidad. el procedimiento participativo recomendó que se eligieran los agricultores aplicando los siguientes criterios: Su sistema de producción es típico de los pequeños productores de yuca.Se aceptó la recomendación de cambiar. en cada ciclo de evaluación. los agricultores responsables de los ensayos y de remplazarlos por otros que se seleccionaban según los mismos parámetros con que fueron elegidos los anteriores; de este modo se hacia participar a vecinos que demostraban interés y tenían posibilidad de establecer ensayos particlpativos en sus fmcas en los ciclos posteriores. El propósito era doble: primero. abarcar suficientes ambientes experimentales para poder garantizar una adaptación amplia de los clones; segundo. involucrar a integrantes de los dtferentes grupos de usuarios que producen yuca en la región. para asegurarse de que los clones eran aceptados por todos esos grupos y no solamente por uno o dos de ellos. Aun así. el grupo de usuarios en que se seleccionaron más participantes fue el de los pequeños agricultores. por dos razones: este grupo contenía la mayor parte de los agricultores de la región. y se ajustaba al mandato recibido por las entidades que implementaban el proyecto.En la experiencia colombiana participaron más de 500 productores diversos (todos hombres) en 90 ensayos. que se realizaron en conjuntos de 15 a 20 flllCas por ciclo. Entre los participantes habia compradores de yuca para las plantas de secado (trozos de yuca o \"chips\"). productores de almidón y miembros de cooperativas. Estos grupos 6 • , fueron invitados a las evaluaciones que se hacian al final del ciclo. o sea. a la cosecha. Había también productores pequeños dedicados a la yuca como cultivo de subsistencia cuyas ralces frescas se consumen en sus hogares; su participación fue muy alta (70%-80%) Y constituyeron así un grupo central (o masa critica). Estos productores participaron en todo el ciclo de cultivo. La información que daban en las evaluaciones los diferentes grupos de usuarios se separó para que no se confundieran los resultados.Aunque el proyecto tenia objetivos específicos relacionados con las personas que participarían en el procedimiento IPMY. en la experiencia de la Costa Atlántica no se aplicó una estrategia que seleccionara sistemáticamente a los participantes. sino que se favoreció la auloselección de los interesados. Por consiguiente. no se pudo establecer previamente un equilibrio que representara a los diferentes grupos de usuarios respecto a la informaCión recolectada. ni se pudieron obtener decisiones representativas sobre los clones que debian continuar en el proceso de selección. En el caso considerado. esta situación no sesgó de modo significativo las decisiones. porque se descubrió que los diferentes grupos tenían objetivos equiparables y preferencias similares en relación con las variedades deseables. así tuvieran criterios específicos de grupo respecto a cada etapa de la producCión (Ashby 1992). Por lo tanto. los diferentes grupos seleccionaron las mismas variedades de yuca. aunque les daban diferentes usos (consumo en fresco o producción de almidón). Sin embargo. en otros contextos en que sean más notorias las diferenCias en variedades y en preferencias entre los usuarios. la falta de una estrategia de selección de los participantes que garantice la representación equilibrada entre los diversos usuarios podría ser una limitante de consideración. En tales casos. la separación de la información según los grupos de usuarios tendría mayor importancia (respecto al caso colombiano).Al reflexionar sobre el proceso de selección de agricultores en el proyecto de la Costa Atlántica colombiana. se percibe la importancia de buscar también aquellos usuarios que pasan desapercibidos o no se autoseleccionan. Por ejemplo. no se consideró a las mujeres como un grupo distinto de usuarios. puesto que su participación era mínima en la obtención de estacas para la siembra y en la planificación y el manejo del cultivo -excepto en la venta del producto en el mercado. No obstante. en un trabajo posterior cuyo objetivo específico era trabajar con mujeres se descubrió que. en esa región. las mujeres desempeñaban un papel importante en la selección de ralces de yuca para la confección y comercialización de 'bollos'¡ (IPRA Project-CIAT 2000). Este mercado lo manejan exclusivamente las mujeres. quienes reciben de él un ingreso para atender ya sea necesidades básicas de la familia. como las compras de ropa para los hijos. de útiles escolares y de medicamentos o. en ocasiones. el costo del transporte. Dado que el proyecto de la Costa Atlántica no tenía como objetivo específico buscar usuarios \"ocultos•. los Investigadores no se dieron cuenta de que esa actividad agricola relacionaba su proyecto con las variedades de yuca. A veces. los usuarios \"escondidos• son mujeres. otras veces son grupos de agricultores de niVel socio-económico inferior al de la mayoría o un grupo que busca abastecer un 'nlcho' del l.Los bollos se preparan con harina de yuca y queso. Se cocinan envueltos en •capachos• (hojas que cubren las mazorcas del maíz) y se comerciallzan en los centros urbanos de la reglón.mercado o un mercado específico de su región. Para evitar el olvido de estos usuarios. el procedlmlento IPMY podría incorporar en el paso de \"Diagnóstico\" un 'sub-paso' denominado 'identificación de usuarios'.En la experiencia de la Costa Atlántica colombIana. las entidades relacionadas eligieron trabajar con agricultores individuales cuyas condiciones socio-económicas y prácticas de cultivo eran representativas de esa región. El procedimiento IPMY recomienda trabajar con no más de 10 personas a la vez. porque este número facilita la toma de datos y su análisis. Sin embargo. otros proyectos de FMP han ensayado este trabajo con más agricultores y. en ciertos casos. con grupos previamente establecidos. En el Nordeste Brasileño. por ejemplo. los investigadores intentaron trabajar con comunidades enteras y con cooperativas. Concluyeron que es muy dificil organizar las evaluaciones y manejar la tnformación proveniente de muchos individuos; se exceptúan los que están asociados en cooperativas. quienes facilitaron muchísimo el trabajo porque ya estaban organizados y acostumbrados a labores de conjunto.El trabajo con grupos de agricultores ha tomado diferentes formas. Por ejemplo. la experiencia hecha en América Latina con los Comités de Investigación Agrícola Local (los erAL). que prestan un servicio de investigación en representación de sus comunidades. Hay también proyectos cuyos investigadores han facilitado la formación de grupos de agricultores. como los que evalúan clones de papa en Ecuador o las escuelas de campo en Bolivia. Estas expeliencias han demostrado que. cuando se trabi'\\ja con grupos. pueden lograrse resultados importantes como los siguientes: apoyo y motivación mutuos entre agricultores; difusión de tecnologías entre grupos de aglicultores; participación en riesgos y en benefiCiOS; y posibilidad de continuar el trabajo después de la intervención de las entidades de investigación.No obstante. se ha comprobado que la formación de grupos para un proyecto específico de FMP implica dedicar más tiempo y. en algunos casos. asignar personal con preparación especial en estos temas. Supone. además. que el proyecto debe situarse en un contexto más amplio de desarrollo rural y no enfocarse en una sola actividad. es decir, en el mejoramiento.Cuando se seleccionan aglicultores para un proyecto de FMP. es importante considerar la distribución de beneficios. Las entidades de investigación tienen. generalmente. el mandato de fomentar el desarrollo rural de una comunidad entera (o de reglones enteras) y no sólo el de algunos agricultores selectos. Es necesario. por tanto. escoger como participantes a aglicultores que no sólo estén en condiciones de representar a su comunidad. sino que estén dispuestos también a compartir lo que han aprendido y lo que descubran en el proceso de investigación. Por consiguiente. el proyecto de la Costa Atlántica escogió no sólo agricultores cuyas condiciones de vida y prácticas agronómicas eran representativas y que tenlan habilidad para comunicarse bien. sino que poseían además fincas cuya ubicación y facilidad de acceso las convertía • en \"vitrinas\" para los productores vecinos que pasaran por allí y vieran las nuevas valiedades ya plantadas. Se estimuló así la difusión espontánea o informal de las vartedades promisortas, lo que aseguró, hasta cierto punto, la \"publicidad\" de los clones experimentales.Al combinar la experiencia adquirida en FMP a nivel global. se comprueba que el tipo de agricultor, el número de agricultores que participan, y el modo de participación de éstos, ya sea indMdual o en grupos. depende de los objetivos que se fije un proyecto y de los recursos que necesite para lograrlos. Por ejemplo. si el objetivo de un proyecto es hacer que los beneficios del trabajo en colaboración se distribuyan ampliamente. se invitada a participar en el proyecto a líderes reconocidos en sus comunidades. Si el proyecto tiene como objetivo incorporar los conocimientos de los agricultores al proceso de selección de valiedades. tratada de involucrar en él a los expertos locales (Programa PRGA 2000). A veces. una misma persona se ajusta a más de uno de estos perfiles; otras veces, el experto local no es reconocido como líder en su comunidad o ellider comunltalio carece de muchos conocimientos técnicos. Astmismo, es comün que un proyecto de FMP tenga más de un objetivo; en tal caso. hay que establecer prioridades para los objetivos y seleccionar los participantes segün esas priOridades.Respecto a la participación de las mujeres en los proyectos, el conjunto de experiencias de FMP de los últimos años ha demostrado que esa participación eleva significativamente la calidad de la investigación. por dos razones: las mujeres suelen encargarse de la domesticación de especies silvestres y, dado su conocimiento refinado del germoplasma. de la selección y conservación de las semillas. Además. las preferencias de las mujeres no siempre son las mismas que las de sus compañeros, ya que no siempre participan directamente en las actividades agricolas. como ocurre en la región de la Costa Atlántica.Los objetivos del proyecto realizado en la Costa Atlantica fueron establecidos por las entidades de investigación después de hacer una exploración inicial en la zona. Conocedores de la gran diversidad genética que hay en las fincas de los pequeños productores de yuca. y de que esta diversidad no es estática sino que cambia con el paso del tiempo. los investigadores aceptaron el hecho de que los agricultores manejan su propio procedimiento de selección. el cual se basa en criterios que les permiten ensayar nuevos materiales. observarlos y. segün el caso. incorporarlos o rechazarlos. Se interesaron los investigadores en conocer estos criterios con ellln de Implementar un procedimiento formal que permitiera aplicarlos sistemáticamente en el desarrollo de tecnologías. Éste fue el objetivo principal del proyecto mencionado. Por ello, IPMY no recomienda que la definición de objetivos sea un paso sugerido del procedimiento, porque supone que esos objetivos han sido fijados antes de que empiecen a participar los agricultores.Los objetivos establecidos para un proceso de investigación infiuyen en la determinación de los pasos y de las actividades que serán Implementadas. Cuando los objetiVos se establecen antes de que los usuartos inicien su participación, las prioridades de éstos no pueden incluirse en la concepción y en la planeación iniciales del proyecto. En el caso de la Costa Atlántica. los agricultores participaron en la fase de diagnóstico y. gracias a esto. el trabajo se rea.llzó con productores que habían identificado como problema principal de su área de producción la variedad de yuca. Ahora bien. no se discutieron los objetivos finales del mejoramiento como tal. por ejemplo: ¿Buscaban los productores variedades adaptadas a sitios especificas o las de adaptación amplia?¿Deseaban obtener una variedad o más de una?¿Buscaban variedades de autoconsumo o variedades de uso múltiple?¿Buscaban mejorar el rendimiento de sus cultivos de yuca o les interesaba obtener variedades que podían cultivarse junto con otros cultivos?¿Intentaban conservar o mejorar sus variedades nativas o querian variedades mejoradas?Estas y otras opciones que ofrece el mejoramiento no pudieron ser consideradas por los participantes del proyecto desde la fase inicial de éste. porque los objetivos ya estaban establecidos.Además de las opciones que podrian identificar en el campo del mejoramiento de yuca. los participantes hubieran podido manifestar también sus preferencias con respecto a su propia participación. El conjunto de experiencias del FMP a nivel global demuestra que pueden variar las etapas de la investigación (o del mejoramiento) en las que participarán los agricultores y airas usuarios. En el proyecto de la Costa Atlántica, como se indicó antes. la participación comenzó en la etapa del diagnóstico. En otros casos de FMP, la participación se inició en la fase en que se establecían los objetivos; en otros más, en las épocas de plantación o de cosecha. La literatura sobre procesos participativos y la experiencia adquirida en éstos señalan diferentes \"grados' de participación, que van desde el estilo consultivo hasta la relación entre colegas. La documentación existente sobre el procedimiento IPMY permite concluir que se prefiere la participación consultiva y que la etapa recomendada para iniciarla es la del diagnóstico. Sin embargo. éste es, entre muchos. un modo de implementar la investigación participativa.Queremos sugerir que los objetivos de un proceso de FMP se pueden establecer de diverso modo. lo que depende de las personas involucradas. de la flexibilidad institucional. y de los recursos disponibles. Hay casos de FMP en que los objetivos del proceso se establecen conjuntamente entre los investigadores. los agricultores y otro tipo de usuarios; por ejemplo. los integrantes de los elAL que trabajan con cultivos como la papa. en Ecuador. Se requiere. en tales casos. que los investigadores expliquen a los usuarios las diversas opciones que éstos tienen y lo que pueden (o no deben) esperar del trabajo de mejoramiento. Además. los investigadores y sus entidades deben considerar la importancia de ser flexibles y capaces de negociar, de modificar sus propios objetivos y de adoptar, cuando sean diferentes. algunos objetivos de los usuarios. Es probable que se requiera también elasticidad en los esquemas de trabajo de la investigación formal y. por ende, en el apoyo proveniente de las decisiones tomadas en niveles altos. como son las de los directores de instituciones.La experiencia realizada en la Costa Atlántica consideró que. dados sus objetivos. el conocimiento de los criterios de selección de los agricultores era muy importante. Aunque dicho conocimiento ha sido un objetivo del FMP, también ha sido reportado como uno de sus productos, lo que significa poco, en realidad. Tendrá significado este conocimiento de los cntenos de selección de los agricultores cuando se incorpore al proceso de mejoramiento, es decir, a la selección de progenitores para los cruzamientos y de clones expertmentaies. Además. los •critenos de selección de los agricultores• no son estáticos, como parece sugerirlo el hecho de que se establecen como un objetivo. Aunque algunos de ellos persisten, otros cambian de ciclo en ciclo y de un grupo de usuarios a otro. Numerosos proyectos de FMP han fracasado por no reconocer esta situación.Otro de los objetivos prtncipales del proyecto realizado en la Costa Atlántica fue seleccionar clones, algunos para un prelanzamlento y otros para ser ya liberados. Este objetivo es común a la mayorla de los programas de mejoramiento particlpativo. Ahora bien, la experiencia adquirida a nivel mundial demuestra que la aplicación del enfoque participativo al mejoramiento de cultivos puede tener una sene de objetivos que van más allá del lanzamiento de variedades mejoradas para una zona determinada. Dicho enfoque, en efecto, ha permitido lograr los siguientes objetivos: conservación y enrtquecimlento de la biodlversidad; organización de grupos de agricultores; cambios en la política de liberación de Variedades; multiplicación de semillas; acceso a materiales genéticos; y acceso más fácil de los agncultores al aprendizaje.Al planear un proceso de FMP, los investigadores y otros grupos de usuarios podrlan considerar este enfoque como una herramienta muy efectiva para lograr múltiples objetivos (Programa PRGA 2000).Entre los resultados del proyecto de la Costa Atlántica más conocidos están los siguientes:El proceso participativo ha sido adoptado y adaptado en varios paises de América Latina.Se modificó el proceso convencional de mejoramiento de la yuca tanto en los eIAL como en CORPOICA lA López, comunicación personal, 2002).Se conocieron los criterios de selección de los agricultores.Se amplió la diversidad genética en los predios de los agricultores.Estos y otros resultados penniten afirmar que el proyecto fue muy exitoso. No obstante. cuando se planeó la experiencia de FMP en la Costa Atlántica colombiana. no se pensó en incluir algunos elementos importantes en el proceso. como los siguientes: una fase de multiplicación masiva de 'semilla' (estacas) que pennita una rápida difusión de los clones más acepiados, un seguimiento del proceso que sirva para afmar la metodologia, y un estudio de impacto. Después de anal!zar varios proyectos en los que se implementó el procedimiento IPMY, se hizo evidente que estos pasos no se deberian dejar de lado porque contribuyen significativamente al enriquecimiento del trabajo y al impacto que éste genera.La calidad de la Información recolectada y el uso que se le da es un tema clave en la Investigación participativa. El reto consiste en obtener, combinar y anal!zar la Información de tipo cualitativo y cuantitativo, y usarla para tomar decisiones en el proceso de Investigación. Es éste un problema difícil que, aunque puede tratarse de diverso modo, no está totalmente resuelto aún en la Investigación participativa.El proyecto de la Costa Atlántica ensayó varias herramientas estadísticas para enfrentar el reto de la calidad de la Información y de su uso. Se destacó el análisis de componentes principales porque pennitió reducir el número de variables y anal!zar tanto las cualitativas como las cuantitativas. La aplicación del análisis de conglomerados ('cluster analysls') pennitió agrupar variedades, criterios de selección y regiones, lo que dio una vísión global de las preferencias. Sin embargo, la herramienta más útil fue la regresión logística. que fue adaptada para anal!zar el ordenamiento de las preferencias y para simular la aceptación de la tecnología por los agricultores. Tal vez la contribución más imporiante de la experiencia realizada en la Costa Atlántica, con respecto a la Información y a su uso, fue haber encontrado una forma de Interpretar técnicamente las opiniones subjetivas dadas por los participantes en las evaluaciones. Esta Interpretación pennitió establecer un puente para el flujo de información entre los sistemas de producción de la Costa Atlántica y las estaciones experimentales.El procedimiento IPMY recomienda, además, el ordenamiento de preferencias ('preference ranking') para que, haciendo comparaciones entre los grados de aceptación de las diferentes variedades, se logre clasificarlas desde la más aceptable hasta la menos aceptable, mientras se torna nota de las preferencias de los productores. Este proceso de clasificación se basa en las técnicas de evaluación abierta que se usan para conocer puntos de vísta cualitativos, explicaciones e ideas acerca de los razonamientos de los productores y de la manera como ellos toman sus decisiones.La secuencia de pasos del análisis de la Información recomendado por el procedimiento IPMY puede enunclarse así:.¡' Desarrollo de flujogramas que guíen cada actividad. ,/ Construcción de listas de términos y de glosarlos agricolas locales. que se clasifican por reglón. para interpretar la infonnación a nivel local. regional y científico.,/ Identificación de criterios. diferenciándolos de aspectos descriptivos;,/ Integración de las razones. las clasificaciones y los criterios identificados. diferenciando antónimos y sinónimos ../' Desarrollo de formularios para sistematiZar la información ../' Elaboración de libros de campo IHemández 1993) ../' Análisis de la información empleando varias herramientas estadísticas.Algunos de los resultados relacionados con la información. que se obtuvieron empleando este proceso en la experiencia de la Costa Atlántica, son los siguientes: uso combinado de herramientas eficaces para obtener información (tablas de frecuencias relativas. distinción entre sinónimos y antónimos, hojas electrónicas para transcribir la información dtrectamente en el campo, escalas para agrupar clasificaciones. matrices con transformación de escalas para analizar conjuntamente la información cualitativa y la cuantitativa, y una matriz de análisis para clasificar el ordensrniento de preferencias); glosarlo de términos; criterios. razones y clasificaCiones; libros de campo; perflles tecnológicos; alternativas probadas en el proceso de análisis.Un método adaptado por san et al. (20001 recientemente en Senegal es la cuantificación basada en un sistema ordinal de ponderación cuasi-arbitrarlo de la percepción que tienen los productores sobre las características específicas de una tecnologla. El método usa el análisis de regresión Tobit que incluye variables para representar tres aspectos: las percepciones de los agricultores sobre la lmporiancla relativa de las diferentes caracteristicas que puede tener un material genético; la presencia y la calidad de esas caracteristicas en los materiales experimentales; y las caracteristicas de los productores y de sus fincas.Este método. así como el que sugiere el procedimiento IPMY, permite explicar, y también predecir. la adopción de materiales mejorados.En el análisis de la infonnación recolectada es importante considerar la fuente de la información y el peso relativo que se dé a cada participante o grupo de participantes. cuando se extraen conclusiones de un ordenamiento de preferencias. Esta consideración equivale a un proceso de votación en el que cada participante tiene derecho a votar por sus clones preferidos. Si la mayor parte del grupo de participantes manifiesta un interés en presentación de la comunidad -que no es necesariamente el interés de todos los miembros de esa comunidad-entonces las recomendaciones que se hartan partiendo del análisis del ordenamiento de preferencias pueden estar muy sesgadas. Por consiguiente. es muy importante. como se indicó antes. escoger cuidadosamente los participantes de un proceso participativo; cuando no es posible hacerlo. se separa la informactón obtenida de los diferentes grupos de interesados para que los resultados representen con mayor precisión las preferencias de la comunidad (o de las comunidades).Otra consideración clave respecto a la calidad de la información y a su uso es la cantidad de información recolectada. Muchos proyectos de FMP recogen más infonnaclón de la que pueden manejar. procesar y usar. Es importante que. al planear un proyecto de FMP. se determine la clase de información que será utilizada y la que no 10 será. Como se indicó antes. una herramienta sugerida por el procedimiento IPMY es elllbro de campo. el cual pennlte recolectar datos tanto objetivos como subjetivos (cuantitativos/cualitativos) y llm!ta, al mismo tiempo, la cantidad de infonnación que se puede anotar.Muchos proyectos de FMP producen listados de criterios de selección de los agricultores. ¿Qué ocurre con ellos al finalizar el proyecto? ¿Hasta cuándo (o hasta dónde) son relevantes para otros proyectos en las mismas áreas? Un caso muy interesante de manejo de la información es el proyecto de mejoramiento de yuca del nordeste de Brasil dirigido por EMBRAPA-CNPMF. Como resultado de la recolección extensa de datos y de la magnitud del proyecto, la mejoradora Wania M. Fukuda tuvo necesidad de crear una base de datos para poder almacenar y manejar ese gran volumen de infonnación. Aunque la investigadora cree que quizás recolectó demasiada infonnación (WM Fukuda, comunicación personal), esa base de datos le sirviÓ de mucho en fases posteriores del proyecto. porque pudo sugerir clones experimentales adecuados para áreas similares a las que contiene la base de datos.La experiencia de la Costa Atlántica colombiana se desarrolló en un marco intertnstitucional en el que participaron diversas entidades. Como se mencionó antes. el GRUYA -el grupo que. en cierto modo. personificó esta concertación intertnstituclonal-tuvo un papel importante en aspectos técnicos. logísticos y estratégicos en razón de su composición, su experiencia. el cubrimiento geográfico que proporcionaba y su participación en las decisiones. Cuatro aspectos se destacan: En primer lugar. el GRUYA pennltió establecer foros multidiscipllnartos de discusión, en los que se intercambiaron experiencias en cada ciclo del cultivo • y se facilitó el análisis y el ajuste de los componentes del procedimiento participatlvo.En segundo lugar. los miembros del GRUYA contaban con una red de ensayos establecida en el norte de Colombia. que reunía las experiencias de más de mil pequeños productores de yuca y las presentaba en los foros para su análisis.Los acuerdos interinstituclonales ayudaron también a las entidades que desarroUaban el proyecto a ver el diverso potencial de uso de la yuca. incorporando en el proceso IPMY elementos o fases de la cadena de producción que no habían sido contemplados al inicio del proyecto.Finalmente. la concertación interinstitucionalles dio la oportunídad a funcionarios de diferentes entidades de exponer su mente al enfoque parlicipativo.Como resultado de esta experiencia. el procedimiento lPMY recomienda que, en cuanto sea posible. los proyectos de FMP que se realicen sean de tipo interinstituclonal.Los resultados de implementar el proyecto de FMP en la Costa Atlántica en un marco interinstitucional se pueden ver en el amplio cubrimiento geográfico del trabajo. que Involucró un gran número de productores. y en la participación de profesionales de diferentes disciplinas. Otro resultado muy importante de la concertación interinstitucional (en particular. de la asociación entre el ICA y el ClAT) en el desarrollo del proyecto de la Costa Atlántica fue que el enfoque participativo se institucionalizó en ellCA. Este instituto lo emplea desde entonces como procedimiento rutinario en el mejoramiento de yuca y de otros cultivos. como el ñame (Dioscorea trífIda L.). en los alrededores de Montería. departamento de Córdoba. desde la estación regional de Turipaná lA López. comunicación personal).A pesar de la concertación interinstitucional con que se implementó la experiencia realizada en la Costa Atlántica. no hubo en ésta una acción de conjunto. Las instituciones participantes desempeñaron el doble papel de asesoras y de vinculo entre las diferentes localidades donde se realizaban los ensayos. pero la responsabilidad de implementar el proyecto. analizar los datos y documentar el proceso fue asumida principalmente por el ClAT. No se recibió. por ello, una información de retomo proveniente de las otras entidades sobre los documentos del proceso y sobre el análisis de la información. la cual hubiera enriquecido, sin duda, este trabajo. Además. al diseñar los acuerdos institucionales no se consideraron tres puntos: la distribución de los recursos y de las responsabilidades de las diferentes instituciones asociadas. y el debido reconocimiento a su labor. Estos elementos son indispensables para crear una motiVación, una participación activa y una conciencia de la propia capacidad ('empowerment') en las instituciones que se asocian para realizar una actiVidad y. en consecuencia, para incrementar las posibilidades de que el arreglo institucional continúe. Tampoco se consideró la idea de emplear la concertación interinstitucional para repetir la experienCia a mayor escala. Esta acción hubiera requerido mayor compromiso de las instituciones asociadas hacia una relación de pertenencia. de la cual ellas también hubieran esperado recibir recursos.El procedimiento IPMY se caracteriza por una serie de pasos en secuencia tnfluidos por elementos contextuales, los cuales pueden afectar tanto la implementación como los resultados del procedimiento. Fue desarrollado hace una década y desde entonces ha sido implementado, adaptado y adoptado en varios países. En los úlllinos 20 años se han acumulado experiencias provenientes de proyectos de FMP realizados en todo el mundo, y de esa acumulación podemos derivar lecciones para refinar el procedimiento y mostrar las diferentes formas en que puede implementarse. Con tal propósito, este artículo exploró cuatro temas clave en la planeación y en la implementación del procedimiento lPMY.,¡' Con respecto a la selección de los agricultores, se recomienda tener una estrategia explícita basada en objetivos de tipo colaborativo, emplear criterios especificos, involucrar a miembros de diferentes grupos de usuarios (incluyendo las mujeres), tanto dentro de las comunidades como en la cadena de producción y comercialización, buscar a los usuarios •ocultos\", y trabajar con grupos ya establecidos (Si existen en el área de trabajo). La selección de los agricultores es un elemento clave para lograr el impacto social del trabajo.,¡' La defm.ición de los objetivos de un proceso de investigación partícipativa es quizás la fase más importante de un proyecto, ya que muchas de las decisiones sobre la manera de implementar un procedimiento dependen de sus objetivos. Sugertmos que, en cuanto sea posible, los objetivos se establezcan en unión con los partícipantes del proceso y no antes de que éste se inicie. Esta decisión puede incrementar. entre los usuarios. la importancia del trabajo y. por ende, su impacto. Además. el enfoque partícipativo puede servir de vehículo al cumplimiento de diferentes objetivos ya que su uso no se restringe solamente al desarrollo de nuevas variedades. En la experiencia de la Costa Atlántica colombiana no se consideraron dos elementos que demostraron ser esenciales en proyectos de FMP realizados posteriormente; son los siguientes: una fase de multiplicación masiva de la 'semilla' de los clones aceptados por los agricultores; y un estudio de impacto en que se evalúen la metodología como tal y el proceso ejecutado.,¡' La calidnd de la Información recolectada y el uso que se le da son otro aspecto clave tratado en este artículo. En la experiencia de la Costa Atlántica se enfrentó de diverso modo el reto de establecer un vinculo entre el análisis de la información cuantitativa y el de la cualitativa. Se recomienda el empleo de ia regresión logística, una vez adaptada al análisis del ordenamiento de preferencias que simula la aceptación de los materiales experimentales por los agricultores. Se recomienda, además, el uso de un libro de ca:mpo similar al que se desarrolló durante la experiencia de la Costa Atlántica. para limitar la infonnación recolectada a una cantidad que reahnente pueda ser usada y analizada. La incorporación de la información o de las conclusiones de su análisis en las decisiones que se tomen sobre los clones que serán evaluados. recomendados o llberados es un paso esencial de un proceso que quiera considerarse participativo ../ El marco interinstitllcional en que se desarrolló el procedimiento IPMY le confuió algunas ventajas al proyecto realizado en la Costa Atlántica colombiana. Mencionemos. entre otras. las siguientes: vincular al proyecto una gran diversidad de profesionales pertenecientes a disciplinas como extensión agricola. investigación. transferencia de tecnología. comercio; disponer de un amplio cubrimiento geográfico para los ensayos;poner en contacto a varias instituciones con un nuevo enfoque de la investigación agricola (lo que resulta ventajoso para ellas).Dado que el marco institucional es un elemento contextual -sobre el cual no influyen mucho los proyectos ni quienes los ejecutan-y que no es un paso sugerido del procedimiento. quizás esté de más hacer recomendaciones sobre su fonna. Sin embargo. cabe mencionar dos puntos: que la colaboración interinstltucional puede ser muy ventajosa para un proyecto de FMP; y que si se obtiene esa colaboración. es recomendable que los integrantes del acuerdo colaborativo establezcan juntos los objetivos y las funciones que en él tiene cada uno. asi como sus responsabilidades y obligaciones.La experiencia de la Costa Atlántica colombiana y la fonna en que se desarrolló el procedimiento IPMY fueron muy eXitosas. Para comprobarlo necesitamos considerar solamente el número de clones liberados y aceptados por los agricultores. y la adopción de ese procedimiento en varios países latinoamericanos. Este articulo presenta un esquema del procedimiento. recomienda algunos aspectos que no se tuvieron en cuenta durante su desarrollo. y demuestra que varios de los elementos clave del procedimiento pueden implementarse de diversas maneras."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1525905853.json b/main/part_2/1525905853.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bb59da61a071924e8c2e1f6e786985e2d9448875 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1525905853.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"d8a6e7ee-0ee6-4a3e-b3c5-40779f77545b","content":"\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1543272468.json b/main/part_2/1543272468.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b6e9a67bce7e91c3915f5aecb7babf07e537251b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1543272468.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5d1e13fe2f25c3c65556d1c3224706b4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/527e358e-53fa-441b-b5b3-cbef851aaa4c/retrieve","id":"1418414869"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f6e3d060-9ec7-4447-b2b3-42ea329abc6f","content":"In the last 15 years there has been a tremendous increase in areas dedicated to Mango production in the tropics and subtropics. Mango production accounts for an estimated 38 percent of total tropical fruit output in 2002 with a total production of 25 million tons. In Africa mango production is currently at the level of 2.6 million tons annually (FAO 2004) with a worth estimated in US$ 42 million (ICIPE 2004). Smallholders supply over 90% of mangoes produced (ICIPE 2004). Mango production is appealing because the fruit is nutritionally important and constitutes an attractive option to increase income and reduce poverty in the rural sector of developing countries. Despite its importance and worldwide distribution, mango suffers from a long juvenile period, erratic flowering and alternate bearing habits. In fruit crops, control of flowering is a critical aspect in the production system, since it determines the seasonality of fruit supply to the market. One of the great advantages of the tropics is the possibility of producing during the whole year, nevertheless fruit producers and markets face major challenges to supply fruits of high quality throughout the year. Biotechnology can potentially be used to manipulate existing cultivars by targeting specific genetic traits, such as flowering behavior. Somatic embryogenesis has been reported in some mango cultivars 1,2 , most of which are polyembryonic. This research aims to manipulate the expression of a target set of developmental genes known to modulate flowering in other fruit tree species such as citrus. To apply these tools, a reproducible embryogenesis and regeneration protocol is required.In the last 15 years there has been a tremendous increase in areas dedicated to Mango production in the tropics and subtropics. Mango production accounts for an estimated 38 percent of total tropical fruit output in 2002 with a total production of 25 million tons. In Africa mango production is currently at the level of 2.6 million tons annually (FAO 2004) with a worth estimated in US$ 42 million (ICIPE 2004). Smallholders supply over 90% of mangoes produced (ICIPE 2004). Mango production is appealing because the fruit is nutritionally important and constitutes an attractive option to increase income and reduce poverty in the rural sector of developing countries. Despite its importance and worldwide distribution, mango suffers from a long juvenile period, erratic flowering and alternate bearing habits. In fruit crops, control of flowering is a critical aspect in the production system, since it determines the seasonality of fruit supply to the market. One of the great advantages of the tropics is the possibility of producing during the whole year, nevertheless fruit producers and markets face major challenges to supply fruits of high quality throughout the year. Biotechnology can potentially be used to manipulate existing cultivars by targeting specific genetic traits, such as flowering behavior. Somatic embryogenesis has been reported in some mango cultivars 1,2 , most of which are polyembryonic. This research aims to manipulate the expression of a target set of developmental genes known to modulate flowering in other fruit tree species such as citrus. To apply these tools, a reproducible embryogenesis and regeneration protocol is required. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1546191639.json b/main/part_2/1546191639.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..562eacdd922281c426251a18b7bae9da1efb8c72 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1546191639.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a6ff10f22f5f547f2b9654c02f077e09","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/54b25a49-e0da-474c-bf95-b870ddb3c3b1/retrieve","id":"437296982"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e78bed3a-2f12-43aa-843d-e43dc24a6cec","content":"My thanks go first of all to my supervisor Mirja Michalscheck who helped me to structure my research, gave valuable feedback and guidance at different stages of the research. It was very nice to have your company and moral support in Ghana. My gratitude goes also to my second supervisor Jeroen Groot, who gave valuable feedback and guidance during the course of the thesis. I would also like to thank my supervisor from Africa RISING, IITA, dr. ir. I. Hoeschle--Zeledon, who supported my research through administrative and logistical support. I thank Dr. Asamoah Larbi, the scientific leader for Ghana for Africa RISING, for hosting us. This research would not have been possible without translators; my thanks go to Baba, Mohamed, Sulimana, Mussah, Roger and Prosper. Many thanks also to my parents who supported me strongly, morally and financially.Lack of labour is a major productivity constraint in African farming systems (Ashburner et al., 2002). This is mainly caused by lack of mechanisation which on his turn leads to labour intensive production, yield losses, uncultivated land and outmigration of young labour force to cities (Loos, n.d.). This migration of young men to the cities constitutes a significant loss of labour force. Also school enrolment causes a lower amount of labour. Methods reducing labour are thus essential for developing African agriculture and food security (Ashburner et al., 2002). This is also the case for Ghana, a country in which 60% of the domestic product, 65% of employment and 50% of exports come from agriculture and where mechanization is still underdeveloped (Loos, n.d.). Land preparation is one of the most labour intensive farm activities in Northern Ghana. It is done with by hoe work (HW), with animal traction (AT) or with a tractor ploughing (TP) (Houssou et al., 2013). As land preparation by hoe is very labour intensive and tractors are not consistently available, ploughing is often done with draft animals, mostly bullocks and sometimes donkeys (Houssou et al., 2013). It is important to know about the historical context of land preparation with hoe, animals or tractors, to understand how the actual situation came into place and understand how farmers decide which technique to use.Before the colonial era, land preparation was done with HW. The British colonial government introduced AT in the 1930`s. At that time, training centres were created where farmers could learn about the technique. The use of AT increased until the independence of Ghana (1957), when the government changed strategy by importing and subsidising tractors (Dibbits and Bobobee, 1997). As the new government perceived AT as not modern enough, they stopped supporting AT, withdrawing credit opportunities to buy animals or equipment (Panin, 1989). But the tractor promotion did not work as planned: farmers faced supply problems, broken tractors, lack of knowledge, lack of finance, lack of spare parts, etc. (Dibbits and Bobobee, 1997). The use of AT declined further until 1970, when the Ghanaian--German Agricultural Development Project wanted to promote fertiliser use but realised tillage was a bigger problem. They then encouraged AT again, as they saw tillage problems in the region and something had to be done about them. The project opened training centres and provided material for AT to the farmers. The project stopped in 1985. After that, farmers continued using AT, due to low numbers and high costs of tractors and tractor services (Dibbits and Bobobee, 1997).In Ghana, from 1991 to 2005 the draft animal population, mainly bullocks and donkeys, increased from 160 000 to 438 000 animals (Houssou et al., 2013). AT is only used in the three northern regions, where soils are relatively loose, dry and sandy. In the South of Ghana, the wet soil is too heavy and there are cattle diseases, making AT unviable. Traction animals are mainly used for ploughing and transport. In the Upper East region they are also used for weeding (Houssou et al., 2013). As AT equipment for ridging and weeding is not always available, weeding is still done a lot by hand (Dibbits and Bobobee, 1997).This research was done in the context of the project Africa RISING (AR, Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation). This research for development project is funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). As a research for development project, AR has community--based experimental stations, in intervention communities, aiming to test new technologies and demonstrate these to the local communities. The study was done in two of these communities, Duko in the Northern Region (NR) and Nyangua in the Upper East Region (UER). In these two communities AR already collected data from 38 farmers in Duko and 32 farmers in Nyangua. This data is compiled in the 'Ghana Africa RISING Baseline evaluation survey' (GARBES).Previous research from AR focussed on resource endowment of farmers. The resource endowment of farmers is expressing their wealth. The building material of their roof, the amount of bicycles and motorbikes they own, the amount of land of which they dispose and the amount of animals they keep are all indicators of the resource endowment of a household (HH). We hypothesize that the ploughing technique is related to the resource endowment of the farmer. We tested this by categorizing the farmers in existing farm typologies and tested whether or not different techniques are used by farmers of different resource endowment.What determines a farmer's choice for preparing the land with hoe, animal or tractor traction? Specific research questions 1. What is the current form and prevalence of ploughing with HW, AT and TP in Duko and Nyangua? 2 From an economic perspective, what are the costs and benefits of ploughing with HW, AT and TP? 3 Which social factors do farmers perceive as important for choosing? 4 Can farmers' perceptions be confirmed their own realities?The research questions can be translated into objectives, and these objectives have matching hypotheses. In table 1 it can be seen how the research question relate to the objectives and which hypothesis match with them. The case study was held in two communities in Northern Ghana: Duko (NR, 54 HH's) and Nyangua (UER, approx. 150 HH) (Fig. 1). Duko is wealthier than Nyangua. Duko is also closer to its regional capital (Tamale) than Nyangua (whose regional capital is Bolgatanga) (Fig. 1). Development cooperation is active in both communities. In Duko TP is mostly used for land preparation whereas in Nyangua AT is more prevalent. Duko and Nyangua are intervention communities of the AR project, allowing to tap into a large pool of additional data and expertise. Both communities are in the Guinea Savannah zone. In the NR the rainy season goes from May to October, the annual rainfall lies between 750 mm and 1050 mm. In the UER the rainy season goes from May/June to September/October, the annual rainfall lies between 800 mm and 1100 mm. In both regions agriculture, hunting and forestry are the main economic activities. In the NR 71.2% of the economically active population works in agriculture in the UER it is 80% (Modern Ghana).The crops grown are maize, soya bean, cowpea, groundnut, rice, millet, bambara bean, pigeon pea, yam, cassava and vegetables. The farmers keep some of the harvest for own consumption and sell the rest to the market. Farmers also have fallow land, mostly due to a lack of financial resources to pay for ploughing, to buy seeding material or fertilisers (Baba, pers. comm.). To group the farmers typologies were used. Several farm typologies have already been developed for Northern Ghana (Kuivanen et al., 2016;Signorelli , 2016 andMichalscheck et al., 2017). Michalscheck et al. (2017) divided the farms in three categories according to their resource endowment: low, medium and high resource endowment (LRE, MRE and HRE). One of the aims of typologies is to allow comparability of farms across regions. In this research we used typologies to compare the different results for different farm types. In Table 2 the typology indicators can be found as used by Michalscheck et al. (2017). Answers of the farmers were given in acres, but are here translated to hectares (ha). Prices were always given in Ghana cedi (GH₵), as this is the price that farmers buy and sell things for. One GH₵ was equivalent to 0,25 US dollars in 2016. When ratios are indicated (e.g. 8/12), it means 8 out of 12 farmers.Information mentioned in the text will be for both communities unless otherwise mentioned. When percentages of farm land will be mentioned in the rest of the text it will be about percentages of the farm land excluding vegetable gardens, yam and cassava fields, as these are mostly cultivated in other seasons and are always ploughed by hoe. Yam and cassava fields are always ploughed by hoe, this because mounts need to be formed. Sometimes the fields are pre--ploughed with a TP or AT to make the formation of the mounts easier.In Duko rice fields are sometimes ploughed with TP and AT. As the AT ploughing is done last these fields will be considered as AT fields.Translators were used to communicate with farmers (see Annex 1 for the names and experience of the translators). We mostly interviewed the household head (HHH) first, as it is the local cultural norm to consult them first in general HH matters (van Veluw, pers. comm. and Baba, pers. comm.). An advantage in interviewing the HHH is that he is aware of most of the farm features. For some HH's the HHH was considered as too old (by the translator) to be interviewed, the (oldest) son was then usually interviewed. When other HH members were around they helped in answering, this was helpful to check the veracity of the answers. In case of female headed HH the sons were mostly helping, as they knew more than their mother, concerning ploughing. Information was collected in different ways: a main survey with closed questions was done, during that survey additional information and explanation was asked. At the end of the data collection period, community level interviews were performed.The main survey had as aim to get a deep understanding of the farming systems. The interviewed farmers were chosen using as a basic principle for selection an MS Excel® randomisation complemented by additional cases to fill gaps, to achieve a minimum number of HH's per farm type as well as a minimum number of HH's using the different traction techniques. The Excel randomisation was done using the list of farmers already covered under the 'Ghana Africa RISING Baseline evaluation survey' (GARBES), in order to link this study with past and on--going activities of AR. The list of farmers was randomized using Excel. The farmers were then visited in the order of this list. The farmers were found using their GPS coordinates. To compensate for farmers from the GARBES list that were not present the day we passed, farmers that were encountered when walking in the village were interviewed. We also interviewed some extra LRE and HRE farmers, as these were less prevalent in the list. In Duko there were only four farmers owning bullocks, and we interviewed three of them while they were not all on the list. The fourth farmer owning bullocks was not surveyed as when we asked a list of all farmers owning bullocks, the AR facilitator did not mention him. In total 51 farmers (25 in Duko and 26 in Nyangua) were surveyed. One to four surveys were done in a day, depending on the translator, the analytic skills of the farmer and the complexity of the farm.The survey consisted of 5 parts. The first part was performed to collect some general information about the HH and to classify the HH according to their resource endowments. The second part of the survey aimed at quantifying how expensive it was to own bullocks. The third part collected data on the fields of the farmers; this part was to see if farmers farm differently when they use different ways of ploughing. In the fourth part labour figures were made, to see if the different techniques required different amounts of labour across the cropping season. Finally, in the fifth part, the farmers were asked how they perceived the technologies for different factors. This was done to see how farmers think on different aspects concerning the techniques. During this five parts farmers were asked to motivate their answers. Farmers also gave comments concerning the questions. These motivations and comments were written down. In the results information coming from there will be written down as \"farmers mentioned that\". 1. General information about the HH In this part of the survey general information was asked to the farmers. We asked to farmers how many animals, bikes and motorbikes they had; this was together with a visual assessment of their house and the amount of land they had used to determine the resource endowment of the farmers. The farmers were also asked their name, and the name of the HHH, if they were answering for him/her. The farmers were also asked how many men and women lived in their HH.Bullock owners were asked all their costs. The costs were asked following a list of costs for owning bullocks (see annex 2) that was based on expert interviews (Baba, pers. comm.). Farmers that had no bullocks were asked to estimate the buying price of a pair of bullocks, the amount of years a pair of bullocks can be used, their selling price when old and the price of the implements. All farmers were also asked to estimate the price of a tractor.Farmers were asked about the locations and distance of each field (from the HH or the HH members) to the homestead. This yielded a map of all the HH fields, cultivated or fallow. As farmers often omitted to mention some fields, for every crop grown in the region the farmer was asked again to mention all their fields. For each field it was asked if they ploughed it with HW, AT or TP. Farmers were then asked how much fertilizer, herbicide and pesticide they applied per field, as well as how much they paid for the products. Farmers paid different prices for their inputs depending on which one they used, when they bought them and if they managed to buy some that were subsidised. Farmers were also asked how much yield they had and if they were able to plough at the optimal time. Delayed ploughing leads to delayed planting and to a lower yield. This delayed ploughing is often due to unavailability of traction services. It was thus asked to the farmers how many weeks later they ploughed due to unavailability of traction services. If they ploughed later than they wanted we asked them how late and what yield would they have expected would they have ploughed on time, et ceteris paribus.Farmers were asked how much labour was needed to crop maize, soya and cowpea. These three crops are common crops in Duko (NR) and Nyangua (UER) and play a central role in different AR trials. Farmers were asked for one of their maize, soya and cowpea fields how many men and women from inside and from outside the HH, worked for each labour task and how many days and hours per day they spent on it. As farmers do not record the hours they work, they were asked from what time to what time they performed each task and how long of a break they took. Farmers often mentioned the time with the position of the sun, which leaded to some lack of accuracy in the data. For labour from outside the HH it was asked how much and how they were paid. The questions were asked following table 3. The amount of days and the hours were multiplied and then summed for all persons to get the amount of man--hours needed for each labour task.Table 3: table used to collect the \"labour data\". 5. Perceived performances Farmers were asked how important they found certain factors for taking decisions on a Likert scale from 0 to 3: no (0), low (1), medium (2) and high (3) importance. Farmers were then asked to quantify how they perceived the performance of the different factors, on a scale from 1 to 5, for HW, own AT and TP, and rented AT and TP (see Table 4). After the main survey was completed a short list of questions was asked to farmers (see Annex 3). This was done to get additional contextualising information and to check if some interesting information from the main survey was also valid for other farmers. For these questions it was aimed to interview farmers that were not interviewed yet in the main survey, but due to the difficulty to encounter sufficient farmers, some farmers from the main survey were interviewed again. During walking through the village we chose the farmers. We asked all encountered male adult farmers that agreed to be interviewed these questions. As few farmers were in the village at the moment of taking these interviews, most farmers that were around their houses on these days were interviewed (the other farmers being at the market, in town, on far away fields, sleeping or at funerals). Due to high levels of alcoholism in Nyangua it was sometimes challenging to find farmers that were in state of being interviewed. Depending on if they were alone or not, the farmers were interviewed alone or in group, this was also recorded.In Duko two of these interviews were performed in group and eight to farmers alone. In Nyangua eight of these interviews were performed in group and eight to farmers alone.In Duko all HHs that were not visited for the main survey were visited to determine their resource endowment. This was done the same way as the general information was asked in the main survey.In Nyangua this was not done as they were to many houses and HH's; the difficulty to find trustworthy farmers was also a reason for this.Farmers, Wageningen University staff, AR project staff and employees of companies providing services (for example selling inputs) to smallholder farmers were considered as experts (see annex 4). Experts were consulted before, during and after conducting the field work. The expert interviews previous to the start of the surveys aimed to get information on the current situation and to ratify the farmers' survey. The expert interviews during the survey taking had as aim to adjust the survey or the way of taking the survey, where needed. The expert interviews at the end were done to interpret the results of the research and contextualise them (Fig. 2).Fig. 2: Contribution of expert at different stages in the research. Experts were also asked more general question about Northern Ghana and not just about the two villages, putting this thesis in a wider perspective .The questions can be found in Annex 5.The data was analysed in Excel. When averages were calculated the standard deviation going with that average was also calculated. All data for which a comparison had to be tested was tested on normality using the shapiro--wilk. The mean differences were compared using a Mann--Whitney test as the data were not normally distributed,.Duko and Nyangua are two communities in two different regions of Ghana, they had differences and similarities. Duko had 54 HH consisting of 343 women, 354 men, 56 cattle, 250 sheep, 311 goats, (99 bikes and 44 motorbikes) and many chickens and guinea fowls. Nyangua is a bigger community, the amount of HH was estimated at 150 HH living in 75 compounds. In Duko every HH had one compound. In Nyangua different HH lived together in one compound, this created a great social cohesion in the village, which made farmers help each other frequently and have prices for labour service which were not fixed. As the prices for labour tasks like weeding and ploughing were not fixed per area of land but agreed upon by the two parties, farmers did not know how big their land was, but gave approximations. It might also be the other way around, that farmers do not charge per area of land because they do not know it. In Duko the houses were grouped in a village in Nyangua they were scattered all over the community. In both communities the livestock was not used as a daily protein source but to eat during ceremonies or to sell on the market (Baba and Sulimana, pers. comm.). (see table 5) The farmers in Duko cropped together 232 ha or an average of 4.3 (SD 3.4) ha per HH. The total cropped area in Nyangua could not be estimated, as it was time wise not feasible to visit 150 HH. In Duko most farmers had small fields (0.3 ha SD 0.21) in the village and a higher number of bigger fields (0.9 ha SD 0.9) further away, on average 21 (SD 16) minutes by bicycle. The average total land size per HH was 5.7 (SD 4.4) ha. As there was no centralised village in Nyangua the concept of fields close by and further away was more complex, but the average field size was 0.5 (SD 0.4) ha and the average total land size per HH was 2.3 (SD 2.4) ha. As the size of the land was big in Duko farmers needed to use TP to be able to cover all and as the walking time to the fields could be high farmers tried to lower the labour intensity by using TP and herbicide. In Nyangua the land size was smaller and farmers thus manage with AT. Using the typology of Michalscheck et al. 2017, we counted 20 LRE HHs, 24 MRE HHs and 10 HRE HHs in Duko, while in the main survey there were 6 LRE HHs, 12 MRE HHs and 7 HRE HHs. In Nyangua we did not determine the resource endowment of the entire community, but in our main survey we chose 5 LRE HHs, 10 MRE HHs and 11 HRE HHs. In Nyangua there were many female headed HH, this was according to the village coordinator (mr. Martin, pers. comm.) partly due to men dying from alcoholism. 6 female headed HH`s were interviewed. Duko is a Muslim community, men do thus not die from alcoholism. This might be one of the reasons we only interviewed one female--headed HH in Duko, following the list of farmers to interview. Fields can be ploughed by HW, AT or TP, which are three different techniques for preparing the land. TP goes deeper in the soil, and does the work faster. TP could plough one hectare in 2.12 (SD 0.9) hours, while one pair of bullocks needed 16 (SD 9) hours or 6.8 (SD 6.6) days as bullocks could only work a limited amount of hours per day. HW needed 171 (SD 101) man--hours to plough one ha. TP used discs to plough the land. AT used mouldboard ploughs in Duko and ridging ploughs in Nyangua (Fig. 3). Ploughing was mostly done to cover weeds and loosen the soil. A ridging plough makes ridges on which the plants can be seeded. Discs and mouldboard ploughs on the other hand aim at a flat field after ploughing. a. b. c. In Nyangua bulls were used for ploughing whereas they used oxen in Duko. Bulls were preferred in Nyangua as oxen would be worth less money when they would sell them. In Duko they said that oxen are calmer than bulls, thus easier to train. In the both communities there were two main cattle breeds, the Fulani and the local cattle. The Fulani cattle are stronger, but were also more expensive. Due to previous cases of theft farmers kept their valuable bullocks inside their compound: in Nyangua in a yard and in Duko in a separate (roofed) building.Concerning differences in ploughing techniques among farm types, we observed that as bullocks were expensive only MRE and HRE farmers could afford them. In Duko 4 of the 54 HH's owned bullocks while in Nyangua 8 of the 26 surveyed HH owned bullocks. As there were so few bullocks in Duko only a fraction of the land could be ploughed with AT (32 ha). The HH owning AT in Duko ploughed own land (14 ha or 3.5 SD 1.9 ha/farmer) with them, but also other farmers land (18 ha or 4.5 SD 4.2 ha/farmer). Even though they ploughed other farmers land with their own bullocks the four farmers still rented TP for 29% to 76% of their own land. As an example one farmer in Duko even told he provided AT service to have money to pay for the tractor. Farmers in Nyangua ploughed with own bullocks if they had some or borrowed the bullocks from other farmers.To compare the three techniques, the surveyed farmers in Duko ploughed together 6 ha with HW, 17 ha with AT and 110 ha with TP. In Nyangua the surveyed farmers ploughed 6.4 ha by HW and 53 ha by AT. Only one of the 25 interviewed farmers in Duko and one of the 26 interviewed farmers in Nyangua ploughed all their land with HW, they were LRE HH's. In Duko the HW using farmer cropped 2.2 ha and in Nyangua 1.6 ha. In Duko all other interviewed HH's used TP. In Nyangua only one HRE farmer used a tractor for ploughing, this next to using his own bullocks. Most farmers in Nyangua did not know that somebody in their village used TP (the AR facilitator said nobody ploughed with TP the year before and when doing the main surveys most farmers mentioned they had never seen TP, only when doing the community level interviews we found out that one farmer used TP).Men were responsible for ploughing, as for most other labour tasks around crop cultivation. No woman, in Duko or in Nyangua, (was) reported to be actively involved in ploughing. In Duko one female headed HH was interviewed, the son answered more questions than his mother as he was more aware of what happened on their land. In Nyangua the six female HHH were also often in the presence of their sons, but could answer (more) independently. Women were unaware of any prices related to ploughing, some even started laughing when they were asked about prices of bullocks or ploughs, as if it was embarrassing or as if they were not allowed to know it. No female headed HH was found who owned bullocks. In Nyangua in female headed HH, other HH members usually did the ploughing together with some people owning bullocks. All female headed HH were LRE (1 in Duko and 3 in Nyangua) or MRE (3 in Nyangua).The agro--economic reasons of farmers to choose for one of the ploughing techniques were the cost of the ploughing itself, the cost of not or late ploughing and the yield. The yield was influenced by various other factors.Prices for ploughing services were higher and were also perceived as being higher in Nyangua compared to Duko (table 6). In Duko the prices for ploughing were fixed. In Nyangua on the contrary there was a wide variation in prices for AT services and for the price of TP the experts said it was an approximation. There were various ways of paying for ploughing services like paying in kind, paying with labour or paying in money. The wide variation of ways of payment and prices was because farmers bargain about the price and way of payment. As there was a great social cohesion, the price depended on the relationship of both parties. In 40% of the fields that used rented AT, the farmer did not pay for the service. An even higher cost than the cost of the ploughing service was the costs of not being able to have the ploughing service on time. The average cost of delayed ploughing as estimated by the farmers was, similar (sig 0.299) in both communities, 1104 (SD 964) GH₵/ ha in Duko and at 1466 (SD 1242) GH₵/ha in Nyangua. This yield loss was estimated by subtracting the yield farmers would have expected if they would have ploughed on time from their actual yield. As tractors and bullocks were lacking in Northern Ghana, not every field can be ploughed on time, therefore farmers delay their ploughing. Delay in ploughing caused delayed plant growth during the rest of the cropping season and as the seasons are short, delay in ploughing caused large yield losses.In Duko, all six LRE farmers reported yield losses due to delayed ploughing and most MRE farmers and HRE farmers also had losses due to delayed ploughing (8/12 for MRE and 5/7 for HRE). In Nyangua, LRE, MRE and HRE farmers reported yield losses (4/5 for LRE, 8/10 for MRE and 5/11 for HRE). In both communities farmers with a pair of bullocks did not report delayed ploughing. But in Nyangua farmers with only one bullock did report delayed ploughing. This as they had to wait on the another bullock to pair with. Costs of delayed ploughing were estimated to be higher for higher resource endowed farmers (see fig. 4). For MRE and HRE farmers the yield losses were higher in Duko as farmers had more land they could thus lose more. As this yield losses are very high it can be argued that this is the main driver for farmers to choose a ploughing technique independent of their resource endowment. As timing of the ploughing was crucial to get a high yield, 5 farmers in Duko mentioned it was the main reason to choose for a technology. Timing was not only important to be able to plant on time, but also to have good ploughing conditions. There is an optimal period for ploughing with AT, it is based on the soil moisture, there should be sufficient moisture in the soil to support the growth of the seedlings (Sulimana, pers. comm.). As AT ploughing takes time, farmers had to start ploughing before the optimal day and continue ploughing after it, which causes suboptimal ploughing conditions, leading to suboptimal planting conditions. Ploughing with a wrong humidity or on a too weedy field or wrong operating can have a negative effect on the quality of the ploughing (Sulimana, pers. comm.). For example: a HRE farmer using bullocks in Duko had to start ploughing before the optimal ploughing moment (to be able to cover more area), the soil was thus a bit too dry and when ploughing with his mouldboard plough he formed small ridges, while he wanted to plough flat, this will cause the seeds to be seeded at uneven height (the ridges were too small to be of any use in later seeding). This farmer also rented TP, because he would be unable to plough all his land by AT within the period that has good humidity for ploughing. Farmers would prefer to plough with AT or TP but did still plough some of their fields by HW as they did not want to miss the ideal time on all there fields.All farmers considered yield as an important factor for choosing a technique (Fig. 5). But not all farmers agreed on which technique yields best. This was because various factors affected the yield, the main ones were the planting density, mentioned by five farmers in Duko and the quality of the Duko Nyangua ploughing itself. But for the planting density there was again no consensus on whether it was higher for AT or TP. 9 farmers in Duko said planting density is one the main factors driving the required amount of fertiliser per ha, but there was also no consensus on which technique required more fertiliser inputs. From the field information from Duko, applied fertilisers was similar (sig 0.991) for the different techniques, as well as yield (sig 0.262).For the amount of weeds there was again no consensus among farmers. Two farmers mentioned that deep ploughing (TP) buries weed seeds two other farmers mentioned it brings them up. What we could see from the field data is that with a higher level of mechanisation there was a higher level of herbicide use (sig 0.017). From the labour figures we saw that weeding time was similar (sig 0.891) on fields ploughed with HW, AT and TP, for maize in Duko.For compaction and moisture there was again no agreement. Four farmers in Duko explained that with deeper ploughing the soil becomes looser thus less compacted three other farmers explained that the heavier tractors cause more compaction. Concerning the moisture two farmers in Duko explained that deep ploughing brings up gravel, one said it causes bad water retention the other said it slows infiltration thus increases water retention. Only the perceptions for Duko were noted down here as most farmers in Nyangua could not answer the questions concerning tractors, as they told they were not aware of it. No clear pattern was found between the resource endowment and perceived quality of the ploughing by AT and TP. Farmers did not only choose how to plough based on what was cheaper and yielded more; they also took social factors into account. The difficulty to choose an operator, the bad quality of the work of the operators and the prestige of the techniques were important factors to take into account.Another factor of choice encountered with renting AT or TP was the skills required to speak to the owner or operator. Farmers mentioned that it cost them a lot of time to look for the operator to plough for them. For TP service some mentioned they had to follow the tractor operator for several days to be sure he would come to their field afterwards. When we saw tractors ploughing in the fields around Duko or AT ploughing in the UER we saw farmers waiting there to get the tractor to their field afterwards. (Fig. 10).a. b. Famers mentioned that the AT or TP operator was not always doing the job like he should do it. They mentioned that some operators did not plough at the required depth, avoided weedy parts, cutted corners of field, etc. with the aim to be done faster. 8 farmers in Duko and 15 farmers in Nyangua mentioned the job would be done better if they would have done it themselves.Some farmers (11 in Duko and 24 in Nyangua) found prestige ('what neighbours will think of them') important for taking decisions, others (14 in Duko and 2 in Nyangua) did not find it important. Which techniques were considered as prestigious differed. For example most farmers found that HW is not prestigious as it is a sign of being poor, but 5 farmers in Nyangua found it prestigious as they considered it as a sign of strength and health.As investments in AT were high we were wondering if farmers would really consider investing in it if they would have the possibility. Another question was why do farmers not use their AT equipment for other labour tasks when they already have bullocks.In Duko 5 famers who did not have bullocks said they would like to buy some, provided they had the money for it. Owning bullocks would lower their costs of delayed ploughing. In Duko, it would also spare them of the high cost of TP service.In the small community based interviews most farmers thought that AT was decreasing (in Duko 6 interviews said it was decreasing while two said it was increasing in Nyangua 11 interviews said it was decreasing while 3 said it was increasing).In Duko neither animals nor tractors were reported to be used for labour tasks other than transport of manure and ploughing, while they could be used for weeding. In Nyangua it was used by some farmers, said 7 community level interviews. This was in Duko, according to one farmers of older age, because younger farmers lost knowledge about how to weed with bullocks. Another reason he mentioned was that farmers in Duko did not use ridging ploughs anymore, but mouldboard ploughs. Ridging ploughs could be used for weeding, mouldboard ploughs not. In Nyangua farmers still used ridging ploughs, but AT was not widely used for weeding as one community level interview said it to be double work.He said he would still have to finish the weeding by hoe after going through with the bullocks. In both communities farmers said during the community level interviews (1 in Duko and 2 in Nyangua) that they did not use AT for weeding because their bullocks were not trained enough, In Duko 6 of the 8 community level interviews concluded that they did not have knowledge about weeding with AT. In Nyangua one community level interview said that farmers prefer to use the scarce service rather for ploughing than for weeding, and as there was a lack of bullocks few people used them for ploughing. In villages neighbouring Nyangua we met two farmers using bullocks to weed (with the ridging plough and with a weeder), they both bought their weeders long time ago and did not know where it could be bought now.In this section the results will be discussed and compared with literature. But first the bias that might have happened will be discussed. This to bring awareness on the problem. During the entire research we tried to avoid it as much as possible, but avoiding it completely is not possible.Bias in farmer's interviews is a main problem in research like Crawford (1997) mentioned. Crawford (1997) called \"Influence of groups at interview\" as a form of bias. During the main survey family of the farmer or other villagers were often around. Family members helped to give correct answers when the HHH did not know it, but they also influenced the decision especially during the questions on perceived performances. When the other persons were HH members it can be argued that this was not such a big problem, as when the farmer would chose for one of the techniques he would also listen to the other HH members. Future research could look at who takes the decisions and link that to the persons that are best present during an interview. Farmers can also voluntarily give wrong answers like following example: One farmer was interviewed, later he was interviewed again, and we realized that the data on labour were completely wrong, we did them again with his wife and children, at the end he admitted in local language to his wife that he lied to show himself as stronger than he was. In this case the voluntarily wrongly given answer was detected, but it is not known how much of the answers were given incorrectly or imprecise, purposely or mistakenly. Another factor concerning the exactness of the data is that some farmers might have tried to omit or add information, because they thought it would increase their chances of projects giving them stuff.As most of the farmers from the GARBES data received help from AR, and not all the other farmers, these might have created a bias in the results. The fact they received help might explain why they were less LRE farmers in the GARBES data. The length of the survey might also have caused farmers to lose their reflection capacity and answer the questions less good.It is thus of great importance for future research to think about the effect, positive or negative, other persons might have on the answers; to make sure the farmer gives the correct answers.The aim of this research was to understand farmers' choices concerning the ploughing of their land. Various agro--economic and social reasons were found, but we are unable to firmly say which technique is better as there was discordance among various factors. In literature we found that there were many differences and similarities with other research in Ghana and elsewhere.In this research, we found that farmers plough on average 3.5 ha of own land and 4.5 ha of other farmers land in Duko. Houssou et al. (2013) found similar values for Northern Ghana (3.8 ha/farmer of own and 2.9 ha/farmer for other farmers land).Women were not involved in ploughing in Ghana as in Ethiopia where it is also not culturally accepted to plough for a woman (Aune et al., 2001). Aune et al. (2001) said that this leads to more vulnerable HH's when they are headed by women. We indeed did not find any female headed HH that was HRE, but if it is because of the ploughing or other reasons, can not be concluded out of this research. This taboo for women to plough is certainly not something universal in Botswana for example a higher percentage of widowed woman (47%) provided their own ploughing compared to men (45 %) (Brown 1983). A lot of strength is required from a person to handle the plough. Probably partially for this reason, women and children were less involved in the management of draft animals then men (Houssou et al., 2013). It is important to know who is responsible for which tasks as these are the persons that projects need to address when addressing the task.In Ghana bulls as well as oxen are used for AT, in Ethiopia (Aune et al, 2001) they use oxen like in Duko. This is because they are easier to handle and train. High prices for ploughing are not something that is only so in Ghana; Brown (1983) indicated that ploughing was also expensive in Botswana, the prices were even so high there that they were not always paid back with the low yields. In Duko and Nyangua only fields with nearly no yield would not be able to pay the ploughing back out of the yield. This was rare but it could be discussed that it might happen more frequently with changing climatic conditions, and dropping yields.In Nyangua prices for ploughing were based on the relation between the two parties while in Duko there was a fix price indicated in money. In Ethiopia like in Nyangua they also rented AT service from relatives (Aune et al., 2001). In Ethiopia prices for ploughing were in percentage of the yield while in Duko they were fixed, in Nyangua they did also not depend on the yield (Aune et al., 2001). It could be discussed that if the prices would be based on the yield like in Ethiopia, operators might plough more carefully. In Ethiopia the price for ploughing was 50% of the harvest (Aune et al., 2001), which was considerably higher than in Duko or Nyangua. Farmers in Ethiopia paying with exchange labour had to work two days per day the oxen worked (Aune et al., 2001). In this research this was not looked at, but could be an interesting factor for future research, as it would lead to a better understanding of the social interactions in Nyangua.Farmers in Duko found it difficult to get farmers to come and plough their land. This was also found by Diao et al. (2014) who also had farmers in Ghana telling them that there was a strong lack of tractor services, and that they had to approach more than one operator to get a tractor to their field. Careless operators were not only a problem in Ghana, in Ethiopia Aune et al (2001) also noticed that farmers owning bullocks ploughed their land more intensively, the quality would thus be worse for farmer not owning AT.Various authors (Nyagumbo, 2017;Biamah et al, 1993;Wilcocks and Twomlow, 1993) also mentioned that ploughing on time is important for the yield, but they did not quantify the costs of the delayed ploughing. Brown (1983) found that in Botswana resource poor farmers got their fields ploughed late or not at all, in Duko as well as in Nyangua farmers from all resource endowment got delay in their ploughing. This might be because in Duko prices are fixed and it was not the one who offers most who got the service first. Costs due to delayed ploughing were tremendously high in Duko and Nyangua. It might be a recommendation for project wishing to help, to provide reliable ploughing services instead of providing inputs. Most farmers in Duko and in Nyangua said that AT was decreasing this contrasting with what Houssou et al. (2013) found for the UER, where they found more farmers thinking AT was increasing and similar to what they found in the NR, where they also found more farmers thinking AT was decreasing.There was a great discordance among farmers on which technique performs better, Pingali et al (1987) also found that farmers were not agreeing on weeding time after AT or TP. This discordance might be because there is no or only minor difference in the performance. Pingali (2007) found that there is generally no yield difference between AT and TP. Similarly Herdt (1983) and Binswanger (1974) found that the difference in yield between AT and TP were more due to different amount of inputs than to the technologies themselves. We found that farmers were not agreeing on which techniques causes less weed problems; Pingali et al (1987) also found that farmers were not agreeing on weeding time after AT or TP. Future research might want to look experimentally at the performances of both techniques like García--Tomillo et al. ( 2017) did, they found that TP causes more compaction than AT. Not all farmers in Duko agreed upon this. There was thus a vast disagreement among the farmers, the question that was not answered is, was this disagreement due to different realities or due to different ways of thinking. Further research could look at this by linking the perceptions of farmers to their agro--economical realities. Many farmers mentioned, they would buy bullocks if they would have money to buy some. It can be discussed whether they really meant it. As farmers preferred to invest in cows, which reproduce. It can also be discussed if the farmers telling they want to buy bullocks only told this because they wanted the West to give them some, or because they were really thinking of buying bullocks. Labour shortage was a main problem in smallholder agriculture, it was for ploughing only a problem if we relate labour to the time window in which the task should be done. We would thus suggest that future research, making labour figures, does not only look at the amount of time a task takes, but also at the time window for it. Gender should also be looked at as the available labour can be available for some labour tasks but not for others as different people have different responsibilities. This study serves as an example for the benefits of multidisciplinary research. It shows that farmers' perceptions are not always what we would expect that they are, nor what can be found from field data or literature. Farmers act out of their perception, it is thus of uppermost importance that next to knowing if a project would work from an experimental point of view, if farmers would also perceive that the project would work. The study thus helps to spend development money or \"private commercial\" resources well and help research for development efforts to actually reach and benefit the farmers.The aim of this research was to understand farmers' choices concerning the ploughing of their land in two communities in the North of Ghana. Nyangua was a community with more HH's then Duko. In Nyangua the compounds were scattered around while in Duko they were centralised. Even though the compounds were scattered in Nyangua there was a bigger social cohesion. All three ploughing techniques were still present in both communities and all resource endowments, with a widespread use of TP in Duko and a widespread use of AT in Nyangua.Ploughing was a responsibility of men in the two communities and among all resource endowment; in projects concerning ploughing the focus should therefore lay on men. Farmers that did not own bullocks (or a tractor) rented them, this was expensive and the quality was not always optimal. On top of that, due to the lack of tractors and bullocks, the service often arrived late, leading to big yield losses. There was no consensus on which technique was better from an agronomical point of view. Farmers contradicted each other as on which technique yields more, compacts the soil more; causes more weed problems, etc. This discordance was also found in literature. Part of the farmers also considered what other farmers would think of them in choosing a technique. What farmers agreed upon is that ploughing late causes tremendous yield losses. This threat might be the main economic incentive to choose for a technique. It can thus be concluded that farmers chose for one of the techniques based on what they think is economically best for them, this taking their financial potential and the social implications into account.In Duko 4 different translators were used:--Mohamed Ghana Idrissu: a retired MOFA (ministry of food and agriculture) officer, that already worked for AR in Duko "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1591593659.json b/main/part_2/1591593659.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3aaf8eaf2627e6ddf537ef0785e60c221c6b37a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1591593659.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"224657ba-e2e5-449c-9a55-83f9800be9d3","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1596060154.json b/main/part_2/1596060154.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4179b9bd9b96b1418e9a05455621004e177df175 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1596060154.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"355de6caadb6f71fb6b9262944438e49","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6173558d-1579-413a-9ed6-b51c37a8360e/retrieve","id":"-1293547267"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3e273a0b-2f43-4e3b-bfb6-a46989721460","content":"The CCAFS-CIAT Data Management Support Pack available from both the CCAFS and CIAT websites is a platform that simplifies the process of identifying data management guidance documents throughout the research life cycle. This pack consists of documents, templates, and videos covering the different aspects of data management, ranging from overarching concepts and strategies to day-to-day activities. To find out more about this resource and how it can help you, read this recently published blog post: Relevant data management support when you need it.In 2017, of the 507 deliverables reported, 86.4% are open access. As you know, CCAFS is mandated to produce international public goods and ensure that they are open access, so it's essential to improve this indicator for the coming years.FAIR Data Principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) support knowledge discovery and innovation as well as data and knowledge integration, and promote sharing and reuse of data.FAIR is not applicable to some categories (i.e. blogs, websites, newsletters, events), so for the FAIR compliance statistic the total of the deliverables considered was 371, out of which 52.6% are FAIR compliant. In detail, 361 are classified as a Findable, 304 Accessible, 282 Interoperable and 287 Reusable. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1597126685.json b/main/part_2/1597126685.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80a98369f8219ba00e049baa186c265687522293 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1597126685.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"86ccb5d034a399e1279e5aeb4cf09aa4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/298eb52c-9b55-4ff2-b235-3da71119d01c/retrieve","id":"1958925879"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a946e9bf-f31e-40df-81ef-3bee1b3b5db3","content":"We will develop Site Integration Plans to bring together the work of CGIAR Centers and programs in key countries, where CGIAR innovations are expected to reach millions of people.• To devise plans for assessing impact, the CRPs will consult with representatives of partners and beneficiary groups in key countries where they aim to deliver outcomes at scale, including governments, NGOs, farmer organizations, processors and others along the value chain, and, ultimately, consumers.• The CRPs will also coordinate with each other to ensure that, in key geographies, their activities are aligned for maximum impact. The CRPs' collective, coordinated commitments in these geographies will be summarized in site integration plans to enable transparent interaction with local stakeholders. The consultation process will be pursued through the GCARD.Moving site integration forward-steps since Science Leaders meeting, June 2015• GCARD3 National Consultations to be carried out in the countries selected for site integration. These will start with National Consultations in 5-6 countries in the final quarter of 2015 and the remaining 15 in the first quarter of 2016. • A process has been undertaken amongst all CRPs and Centers to start initial planning for site integration, including discussing the terminology for the initiative, identifying the countries and nominating leadership (next slides). • From this process a list of 20 countries was identified, with 6 of the countries identified-covering major regions/sub-regions-which will involve more focus and effort on integration amongst CRPs and collaboration with the National actors and stakeholders. These 6 will be the first countries to have National Consultations organised in, taking place in 2015. • CGIAR entities-both Centers and CRPs-are deciding on leadership for site integration in the selected countries and forming steering committees to initiate, plan and implement the necessary activities.• A process has been undertaken amongst all CRPs and Centers to start initial planning for site integration. This process has resulted in the selection of 20 countries based on three criteria:-Criteria 1: Significant CGIAR presence based on significant planned investment (>$1million), staff based in country and major infrastructure in country -Criteria 2: Combined weighting of rating countries as High, Medium orLow in terms of impact potential, government interest, donor focus, and existing coordination mechanisms -Criteria 3: Selection by CGIAR entities of countries they felt important to be included as part of the site integration initiative"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1604148619.json b/main/part_2/1604148619.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a69e3d81d78c8b1b698f73685e24f6c9d0503442 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1604148619.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"529ce8b7717e90105ff3ee6595d9b68b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/29bea5e8-ccb0-43c1-a545-805a57a56726/retrieve","id":"-433587227"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"78fc36f3-c67a-4939-aa29-a8d3ac81a5cb","content":"Le programme de recherche sur l'intensification durable en Afrique pour la prochaine génération (Africa RISING) comprend trois projets de recherche pour le développement qui sont soutenus par l'Agence américaine pour le développement international (USAID) dans le cadre de l'initiative de sécurité alimentaire mondiale 'Feed The Future' ('Nourrir l'Avenir')' du gouvernement américain. Ces trois projets parallèles se concentrent sur la zone de la savane soudano-guinéenne, les hauts plateaux éthiopiens et l'Afrique orientale et australe.Africa RISING cherche à offrir des opportunités de sortie d'une situation de faim et de pauvreté chronique pour les ménages de petits exploitants, grâce à la recherche-action et au développement de partenariats. Notre approche repose sur l'intensification durable des systèmes agricoles dans le but d'améliorer l'accès à la alimentation nutrititive ainsi que de promouvoir la sécurité du revenu, en particulier pour les femmes et les enfants tandis que les ressources naturelles sont conservées, voire améliorées.Les trois projets menés en partenariat sont coordonnés par l'Institut international d'agriculture tropicale (en Afrique de l'Ouest, de l'Est et australe) et l'Institut international de recherche sur l'élevage (dans les hauts plateaux éthiopiens). L'Institut de recherche sur les politiques alimentaires effectue le suivi, l'évaluation et l'analyse d'impact. Chaque projet collabore avec divers instituts de recherche nationaux et internationaux et diverses organisations de développement publiques, privées et de société civile pour des résultats orientés vers la recherche-action participative. Cette collaboration est un défi majeur.Africa RISING vise à identifier puis rendre les technologies d'intensification durables et les pratiques de gestion pertinentes accessibles aux petits exploitants agricoles dans une variété de contextes agro-écologiques, économiques et sociaux. Ces stratégies comprennent :Les méthodes de recherche participatives qui favorisent l'évolutivité et la durabilité sociale des innovations agricoles. Les stratégies incluent une vaste consultation des agriculteurs locaux (en particulier les femmes) durant la conception et la mise en oeuvre des projets, une focalisation sur les technologies sélectionnées par les agriculteurs eux-mêmes et les méthodologies de recherche-action telles que « les essais sur champs et expériences simultanées à petite et grande échelle».L'adaptation locale des technologies éprouvées pour faciliter l'adoption de la technologie. vise les technologies pouvant inclure des variétés améliorées de cultures, des cultures intercalaires ou associées de légumineuses, les plantes fertilisantes, l'intégration de l'élevage ou des légumes, les stratégies de gestion des sols et de l'eau, la mécanisation à petite échelle, Les stratégies de gestion intégrée des ravageurs, les pratiques post-récoltes et phytosanitaires et les systèmes de production de semences locales. Le projet vise à soutenir l'intégration et l'adaptation des combinaisons appropriées de ces technologies de manière à miser sur leurs synergies pour améliorer la productivité de l'ensemble du système.L'accent est mis sur les résultats généraux de développement qui permettent de mieux saisir et apprécier les gains de productivité dans un contexte particulier au sein du système de subsistances des ménages agricoles en général. Chaque technologie est évaluée pour sa contribution non seulement au rendement, mais également aux objectifs environnementaux et de développement tels qu'une amélioration des budgets de la main d'oeuvre pour les femmes, une meilleure nutrition pour les familles, une infiltration et conservation hydriques plus élevée des sols, des revenus plus élevés, l'endurance au marché et aux fluctuations de climat.Africa RISING réunit les compétences de10 centres CGIAR et associés internationaux, locaux et/ou universités internationales, les Etats, les instituts nationaux de recherche agricole, les ONG et le secteur privé. Il vise explicitement à aligner ces interventions sur les priorités du PDDAA à l'échelle nationale et continentale et à compléter les investissements de la mission de l'USAID nationale et développer un modèle de Recherche pour le Développement intégré qui soit évolutive et adaptable.Peter Thorne -ILRI Ethiopie, p.thorne@cgiar.org Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon -IITA Nigeria, i.zeledon@cgiar.org Mateete Bekunda -IITA Tanzanie, m.bekunda@cgiar.org Asamoah Larbi -IITA Ghana, a.larbi@cgiar.org Carlo Azzarri -IFPRI USA, c.azzarri@cgiar.org Simret Yasabu -ILRI communications, s.yasabu@cgiar.org http://africa-rising.net"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1610956556.json b/main/part_2/1610956556.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2c61c5bc644f0e98b2589f9feecfe864eb1bdeb9 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1610956556.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a6885339dbbf4b8373e473015debad42","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a2a26dd0-6c0e-4fe0-bff3-40ccb0534c1e/retrieve","id":"457206670"},"keywords":["technology adoption","Xanthomonas Wilt","cost-benefit analysis","banana farming","Uganda"],"sieverID":"c2b5a18a-22dd-49b6-b17a-a3f1c3543e33","content":"Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW) poses a serious threat to livelihoods and food security for millions of households in Africa. Despite considerable investments in Uganda by the Government and other national and international stakeholders, the disease persists in the country after periods of significant resurgence. Building on the Agricultural Innovation Systems framework, this paper reviews the role of the major stakeholders involved in controlling the disease in Uganda. Next, using household survey data, it analyzes economic costs and benefits of adopting an integrated BXW control package for the Ugandan smallholder farmers.After 2015, there has been a significant reduction in both public and private investments in BXW management, which may contribute to future disease resurgence. Our analysis reveals a high level of partial adoption of BXW recommended practices, and just a third of farmers adopting a full control package. This means significant economic losses for nonadopters, as indicated by our findings that households adopting the full package registered a net balance of US$65 per acre higher than non-adopters. We find that disproportionally large costs need to be borne at the beginning of the process, while the benefits are distributed over time, which may present a barrier to adoption by resource-poor smallholders.Bananas represent an important staple food and cash crop in East and Central Africa (ECA), contributing to food security and household income of rural populations (Ouma et al. 2010;Blomme et al. 2019). Since 2001, regional banana production has been seriously affected by Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW) disease, caused by the bacterium Xanthomonas Vasicola pv. Musacearum (XVM) (Valentine et al. 2006). The disease often leads to complete crop loss, seriously compromising the food security and livelihoods of many rural households (Ssekiwoko et al. 2015;Blomme et al. 2017a). While it has clearly affected food security in East and Central Africa, its impact on the welfare of the farmers is not yet fully understood (Geberewold 2019).Uganda is a secondary centre of genetic diversity for bananas where per-capita banana consumption is amongst the highest in the world (Gold et al. 2002;Karamura and Mgenzi 2004;Karamura et al. 2010;Daniells and Karamura 2013). Therefore, BXW poses an extremely high threat to the farmers' livelihoods, food security and even the overall economy. Studies show that during the first peak, between 2001 and 2004, the incidence in affected fields increased by 70% in a period of one year (Kalyebara et al. 2006). Losses due to Xanthomonas wilt were estimated at US$34.3 million in 2005 and US$75.6 million in 2006 (Mwangi and Nakato 2008).Over the years, a mix of global, national and local research and extension efforts have been deployed to manage the disease. The development of a genetically modified (GM) banana resistant to BXW could represent an economically viable option (Ainembabazi et al. 2015). However, in Uganda the GM technology is not available yet (Bendana 2020). In the absence of any reported BXW resistance, the most effective agricultural practices for containing disease spread and resulting yield loss were developed (Blomme et al. 2017a). Such practices were identified using information obtained from epidemiological studies implemented within several partnerships from local and international research institutes and universities (Tushemereirwe et al. 2006). Rural development stakeholders from government and non-governmental organizations also contributed to developing, creating and promoting these practices and linked field trials (Ssekiwoko et al. 2006). In some cases, households have been involved in the process in order to adapt the recommended practices and make them more consistent with the reference context (Bagamba et al. 2006). Combinable complementary practices (rather than standalone measures) include: (1) de-budding; (2) removing diseased plants; 1 (3) disinfection of tools; and (4) use of clean planting material (Tushemereirwe et al. 2006;Tripathi et al. 2009;Kubiriba et al. 2014;Kubiriba and Tushemereirwe 2014). Importantly, complete BXW control is only possible by deploying all these practices together, which can be achieved with participatory approaches that effectively sensitize and mobilize households regarding BXW and its control (Kubiriba and Tushemereirwe 2014). For this reason, the Ugandan Government jointly with different NGOs has widely promoted an integrated system of cultural control through awareness campaigns, community action, farmer field schools and other African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development is co-published by NISC Pty (Ltd) and Informa Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group) participatory methods that involve smallholders' active participation (Kubiriba et al. 2012).Despite these efforts, the emergence of BXW in Uganda continues to pose a significant problem. After a period of lower incidence, the second peak occurred in 2013, with more than 50% incidence (National Banana Research Program Website 2015). BXW is also currently present in the whole of the African Great Lakes region (AGLR), i.e. Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo), Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda and it is spreading westwards putting the plantain belt of central and west Africa at risk (Ocimati et al. 2019). When studying BXW management it is necessary to understand the causes of disease persistence. Following the Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS) perspective, we recognize that agricultural innovation involves many different actors and factors and that it can only be successful if it meets the farmers' needs. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) defines AIS as 'a strategic framework that takes a demand-driven, interactive approach to technological and institutional change in agriculture. It emphasizes a continuing process of stakeholder interaction in a wider enabling environment to address constraints, thus inducing innovation' (FAO 2015). In a robust AIS, actors must operate independently while maintaining continuous connections with other system players in order to form interactive networks (Sanya et al. 2018). No single actor dominates, and farmers are recognized as equally valuable sources of innovation (Poncet, Kuper, and Chiche 2010;Dolinska 2017). In addition, socio-technical adaptation of the innovation in specific contexts is important in order to meet the needs of the end user (Cullen et al. 2014). Effective interventions depend on actions on all decision-making levels, from the government to farmers. Consequently, it is crucial to understand actors' involvements in the 'value chain' of BXW management and what are their costs and benefits.From the farmer perspective, the promoted BXW control practices were viewed as effective, however their adoption and impact on livelihoods is complex and depends on a variety of factors (e.g. Okurut et al. 2006;Biruma et al. 2007;Blomme et al. 2007Blomme et al. , 2019;;Mwangi et al. 2007;Jogo et al. 2013;Kikulwe et al. 2018). For instance, household perception of BXW control effectiveness significantly influences adoption of practices which, in turn, influences household food security. Households that perceive practices to be cost effective are more likely to adopt them which, in turn, enhance household food production resulting in increased food security (Kikulwe et al. 2018). Additionally, training received is an important factor boosting the adoption of the practices, especially in the case of women (Kikulwe et al. 2019).Both from the national and household perspective, the assessment of economic feasibility of the package is still missing. Much of the literature focuses on methods for identifying and promoting the practices (Muhangi et al. 2006;Okurut et al. 2006;Ssekiwoko et al. 2006;Kubiriba and Tushemereirwe 2014;Blomme et al. 2017b); however, evaluating the corresponding benefits of their adoption is usually omitted. The same observation can be made with reference to the long-term economic feasibility of households adopting these cultural practices. Kubiriba and Tushemereirwe (2014) argue that no single management option in isolation can effectively contain the spread of the disease, and only the adoption of the whole package of practices is effective. Kikulwe et al. (2019) report on the impact of adoption level of BXW control practices on the value of banana production, which is a step towards better understanding the economic benefits of BXW management. The authors show a positive and significant impact on banana farmers' productivity and sales resulting from adoption of BXW control practices. Despite this, we did not manage to find any studies that analyze both the economic capacity of banana-based households to support the adoption of such practices in the long term and the overall investment returns.In response to this, in order to improve the effectiveness of the BXW management in Uganda and to provide lessons for other countries that face the same battles, it is crucial to answer the following questions:. Who are the main actors in the AIS of the BXW management, and what are their interactions, efforts and costs related to fighting the disease? What has proven effective and what has failed? . What are the costs and benefits of managing BXW for smallholder farmers? Are there economic reasons behind the low adoption rates of the integrated package of cultural practices?In this study, we aim to answer these research questions. We follow the AIS framework and use qualitative and quantitative data to identify the main economic actors involved in the banana value chain, including national and international institutions, together with their investments in disease management in Uganda. Moreover, we quantify the costs and returns on investment into BXW control at farm-household level to determine if the integrated package of cultural practices promoted to limit the spread of BXW is economically feasible for the banana-based households in Uganda.This paper is organized as follows. The next section introduces data sources, followed by a presentation of the outcomes of the analysis. The final section presents the discussion and conclusions.Data sources and analytical framework AIS actors can be all public and private actors involved in the development, dissemination, adaptation, and utilization of all kinds of information related to agricultural production and marketing. In sub-Saharan countries, an AIS usually includes: traditional sources of innovation (indigenous technological knowledge); modern actors (NARIs, international institutes of agricultural research, universities, and advanced research institutes); the private sector, including (local, regional, and multinational) agro-industrial firms and entrepreneurs; civil society organizations (NGOs, farmers, consumer organizations, and advocacy groups); and institutions (laws, rules, values, traditions, and norms) that influence the production and distribution of innovations (Anandajayasekeram 2011).In this study, the innovation is represented by the full package of practices to be applied against BXW. Therefore, the actors highlighted in this study are those who have a role in the creation, implementation, dissemination, and communication of the practices to contain the spread of BXW. As can be seen from Figure 1, multilateral organizations (such as Bioversity International) together with national agencies (such as National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO)) are responsible for bringing research and education into the framework; the political system, such as local governments, National Agricultural Advisory Services ( NAADS), and the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) can be considered the bridge between science and the agricultural value chain actors (Aerni et al. 2015). Finally, private companies and sub regional and continental organizations contribute to agricultural value chain in many ways.Regarding the data sources, this analysis is based on two different types of data: (1) qualitative data collected through key informant 2 interviews in 2018, and (2) quantitative data collected through a survey conducted in 2018 among smallholder farmers in four different regions of Uganda. Data were collected and analyzed separately and then combined for validation (Gotor, Caracciolo, and Watts 2010). Qualitative information provided by key informants was also used for a better understanding of the smallholders' data obtained through the survey. We identified a relatively small group of key informants 3 upon their in-depth knowledge of the banana sector, with focus on BXW and the related investments. Table 1 shows the list of the 14 experts that were interviewed following a semi-structured format.The informants can be mapped along the value chain of the stakeholders belonging to the AIS framework, as shown in Figure 1. Data were analyzed through narrative analysis (Kawulich 2004) to identify common narrative patterns.The quantitative analysis is based on information collected from Ugandan banana-based farm-households through a survey carried out between April and May 2018. The sampling method follows a previous BXW incidence and management survey done in 2015, and more detailed data on management costs were collected from four purposively selected major banana-growing and -consuming regions (i.e. Eastern, Central, Midwestern and South-western). From each region, three districts were randomly selected, totalling 12 districts (Kamuli, Kumi and greater Mbale district from Eastern; Kayunga, Kiboga, and Luwero from Central; Bushenyi, Rukungiri and Ntungamo from Southwestern; and Kabarole, Masindi and Mubende districts from Mid-western region). Two major banana-producing sub-counties were purposively selected per district and from each sub-county one parish was randomly selected. At the parish level, three villages were randomly selected and at least 15 households randomly selected per village from village household lists provided by the local council authorities. A minimum of 90 households were interviewed per district, except Bushenyi district whose sample size was doubled due to high incidence of BXW. The total sample size included 1,170 respondents. However, due to missing data, some responses were dropped. The sample frame is summarized in Table 2. The survey is composed of several sections including household information, activities for BXW management, and banana production costs and yield. We focus on the data coming from the latter section in order to verify if the integrated package of cultural practices promoted to limit the spread of BXW is cost effective at farm level.The first objective of the study aims to identify the main actors in the BXW management AIS and their contribution. Table 3 lists the actors involved in efforts to control BXW and their specific activities. The information contained in this table is based on the discussion with experts. The qualitative data on costs were collected from at least one representative per sector, with the purpose of identifying as many investments as possible. Thus, this is not intended to be an exhaustive representation of all the costs sustained by each sector, but rather a map of records.Activities were listed and disaggregated by stakeholder as follows: local and national agencies, multilateral organizations, and private companies and foundations. Each stakeholder presented in the table, along with their related activities, is part of a network that covers all the fields of action of the AIS against BXW.National agencies have played a prominent role regarding research and education within the AIS. Indeed, the national agencies have carried out communication campaigns through radio, TV, newspapers, posters, etc. They were also in charge of developing the participatory approaches implemented at local level, together with monitoring and surveillance of activities. Specifically, the National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) carried out a study and development of control practices, as well as monitoring and evaluation activities.More specifically, during the three-year period of 2013-2016 (at the climax of the disease), the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) created a budget dedicated exclusively to managing BXW. A total amount of 7,389 million Ugandan shillings (around US$2.9 million at the exchange rate in 2013) was allocated for this purpose. The distribution of costs among each activity carried out by MAAIF is shown in Figure 2. More than half the budget was spent on demonstrations and community actions, 4 which are considered highly effective techniques, especially at local level. In fact, a key informant stated: Participatory community-centred communication is important not only to enhance households' capacity and awareness, but also to adapt their interventions and increase effectiveness of communication channels (Tinzaara et al. 2013a). Indeed, the structure of knowledge development is gradually becoming more and more horizontal over time. Meetings for the exchange of knowledge between farmers and between them and government officials encourage the dissemination of knowledge and the adoption of innovations within the AIS (Leitgeb and Vogl 2010). One of the key informant interviews revealed that the massive campaign carried out by the National Government in 2013 prevented households from heavy yield loss, managing to recover 64% of monthly sales from BXW affected areas compared to the peak period (National Banana Research Program Website 2015). Furthermore, from 2013, the Government of Uganda launched the 'Operation Wealth Creation' (OWC) project that, among the other things, provides agricultural inputs for households including clean planting material critical to fight BXW.Currently, national agencies do not receive funds specifically for fighting BXW; and the local situation reflects that at the national level. During the last BXW peak, 40 districts in Uganda received a total of US $540,000 from MAAIF, specifically for BXW management. At present, districts receive money every year from the 'Production and Marketing Grant' founded by the national government, of which pest and disease monitoring takes 10% of the budget. As an example, Luwero District uses 1 million Ugandan shillings (around US $270 at current exchange rate) per quarter to do BXW monitoring, 500,000 Ugandan shillings (US$135) per quarter to do demonstrations and 500,000 Ugandan shillings (US$135) per quarter to pay transport and allowance for the extension staff. Out of the budget, each district is free to allocate as much as is required for BXW management. However, the opinion that has been reported at a local level is that lately the government has not provided enough funds to carry out all the practices and activities needed to fight BXW. As an example, in Wakiso district they currently do only distribution of new planting materials and a few training sessions are implemented by extensionists. With this in mind, the Ugandan National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) actively co-operated with different multilateral organizations including Bioversity International for improving productivity through generating, promoting and scaling practices such as Single Diseased Stem Removal (SDSR) and de-budding, and linking households to markets through agricultural information in cooperation with other regional agencies (e.g. extension offices and local Government). Moreover, between 2012 and 2015, NARO invested US$2 million received from the World Bank and the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) for carrying out activities such as field trials, data collection, biosafety regulation and promotion campaigns (Figure 3). Furthermore, NARO is currently focusing on developing resistant varieties, both obtained from genetic modification and conventional breeding. Indeed, the development of disease-resistant banana cultivars remains a high priority since households are often reluctant to employ labour-intensive disease-control measures (Namukwaya et al. 2012), severely compromising its eradication. This is in line with AIS, which highlights the importance of local adaptation of agriculture innovations in order to meet the needs of the final users (Adejuwon 2019).Many multilateral organizations and humanitarian agencies have been active in the country to fight the spread of BXW, supporting both the government and research centres through donations and providing qualified personnel to educate households about BXW control.The main non-profit organizations that have been active during the last peak of the disease in 2011-2013 were the World Bank, FAO, USAID, the McKnight Foundation, the Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa (ASARECA) and Catholic Relief Services (CRS). Unfortunately, investments at the international level were discontinued in some cases even before 2015.Following the narrative analysis of qualitative data (Kawulich 2004), it is possible to identify a common path focused on the dissemination of information. Even if in different forms, it is possible to gauge the levels of commitment by the various stakeholders to increasing farmers' knowledge and skills on BXW control. Some examples are communication and education campaigns, demonstrations, training sessions and meetings. All these initiatives are very important in the AIS as they allow farmers to make more informed choices and promote the adoption of the package of practices promoted to limit BXW spread (Leitgeb and Vogl 2010).Furthermore, it is possible to identify another common path that shows the difference between investments at macro-level during the last peak of BXW in the country and the current situation. Indeed, all the costs sustained by MAAIF regarding BXW during the past three years have not been specifically targeted against the disease but have been a part of the general budget for pest and disease control. As for the MAAIF, the amount of funds paid out for BXW control from multilateral organizations and private agencies has also been drastically reduced.It is possible to observe this trend from Table 4 which summarizes the information obtained from the key informant interviews, regarding the investments made to limit the spread of BXW classified by stakeholder and time period.This reduction in both public and private investments in management of BXW is consistent with the 2015 declaration that BXW in Uganda was declared under control, with less than 2% of banana plantations affected by the disease.Nevertheless, some stakeholders have argued that the current level of investment is not sufficient to meet the demand of all banana-based households, especially regarding certain inputs, such as JIK (commercial sodium hypochlorite) and clean planting material, perceived by farmers as expensive and with low availability (McCampbell et al. 2018). In fact, the informal source of inputs (such as farmer-to-farmer exchange) is preferred by farmers as the cost is lower than when buying from formal sources (Bagamba et al. 2006). This shows that smallholder farmers depend heavily on their network relationships to seek resources to overcome the challenges they face (Magala, Najjingo Mangheni, and Miiro 2019). However, this socio-cultural practice based on the exchange of inputs rather than on their purchase aggravates the problem because it increases the risk of BXW spreading (Tinzaara et al. 2013b;McCampbell et al. 2018).Overall, stakeholder interviews revealed the trend of investments that occurred in the past 10 years, wherein multilateral organizations and private companies and foundations played a great role, especially during the first peak. However, the effort carried out by the different actors appears to be complementary over time. Even though we cannot state how much funding in total was invested to fight the spread of BXW, this qualitative analysis reveals a general course of action whereby a considerable amount of money was provided during both peak periods (2006 and 2013), compared to the period of low occurrence, when investments almost stopped. Consequently, currently local governments struggle to maintain a minimum level of awareness and monitoring among households, thus being unable to ensure that the incidence rate remains low.As discussed above, considerable investment by different actors of the AIS was necessary in order to identify and promote the most suitable practices to limit BXW spread. However, the adoption of innovative agricultural practices is determined by a series of individual decisions which are influenced by a comparison of expected benefits with expected costs of adoption (Uaiene, Arndt, and Masters 2009;Nankya et al. 2017;Despotović, Rodić, and Caracciolo 2019). These depend on several uncertain future outcomes, like market prices of bananas or the actual share of bananas that will be lost to the disease. How farmers build their expectations, and what information they use to make decisions has long been subject to debate. Usually, it is assumed that farmers (people in general) use all available information which includes learning from the past. This is why it is crucial to assess if the adoption of the integrated package of cultural practices promoted for BXW management was cost effective for the banana-based households in Uganda in the past. It will also provide necessary information for policy makers on the strategies and actions that can be implemented along the AIS to improve adoption rates by farmers. For this reason, we collected data on costs of banana production at household level, highlighting specific costs of BXW management.Households must sustain different costs for the adoption of BXW disease management practices. They can be organized as follows: explicit costsmonetary costs that require cash outflows (i.e. hiring labour; buying inputs as tools and JIK) and implicit costsmonetary costs for the internal resources uses and loss of potential income (i.e. yield loss; productivity loss; time used by household family members to manage the disease). Among the main benefits there are: a lower risk of loss of production, an increase in agricultural income and strengthened food security.In the first step, we grouped households according to the number of practices effectively adopted. This was done in order to identify for each group, average benefits and costs and thus the positive or negative balance of practice adoption. Potentially, by increasing the number of practices adopted, both costs and benefits will increase, varying the net balance. The variation of the net balance allows the cost-benefit analysis of BXW management.Full adopters are defined as those smallholders who applied all three main practices altogether (de-budding, removing diseased plants and disinfecting tools). 5 Full adopters represent about 33% of the sample (328 smallholders over the total surveyed 1,008). On the other side, low adopters are defined as those banana-producers who applied only one or two out of the three main practices (62% of the sample). It was decided to group those who have adopted only one or only two practices together as one of the objectives of the current study is to verify whether the adoption of the integrated package of practices generates a higher net balance than the partial adoption of the package of practices. Finally, non-adopters are the smallholders who did not practice BXW management at all (recognized to be 5% of the sample). Table 5 shows the descriptive statistics of each category, including household size and gender and years of education of the household head. On average, it is possible to observe that among the different groups there is a similar distribution of all the variables considered. Only with regard to the gender of the household head it is possible to observe a lower percent of females for the group of non-adopters (15% female on average compared to 28% and 24% for low adopters and full adopters respectively).It is expected that the three groups of smallholders face different costs for the BXW management, benefiting on the other side different level of revenues, that means different level of BXW control. More in detail, for each BXW management practice, the associated specific inputs were identified. For instance, for removing diseased plants, the cost of inputs is related to the purchase of pangas (machetes) and pruning knives. For de-budding, it is related to a forked stick. Finally, regarding disinfection of tools, only the cost of JIK 6 was considered. The explicit cost of each tool (except for JIK) used in BXW management was amortized over 10 years, given their usual lifespan.The cost of labour is composed of the explicit cost that comes from hiring labour specifically for BXW management and the implicit cost that comes from the time spent on BXW management by household members. The cost of household members' labour is considered an 'imputed cost' of two thirds of the average daily wage of the hired labourers, multiplied by total time spent on BXW management in the past 12 months.Regarding the costs of banana production that were not related to BXW, the identified input costs are the purchasing of seedlings or plantlets; fertilizer; mulches; cover crops; pesticides and herbicides. The cost of labour, the same as for BXW management, is composed of hired labour and family labour. The cost of the latter is calculated as two thirds of the average daily wage of the hired labourers, multiplied by total time spent on it by each household.Analytically, for each n-th farmers, all the costs (C n ) are calculated per acre (eq.1), in order to have results not affected by different land size.where I nm indicates the quantity of the m-th input purchased for banana production in the last 12 months by the n-th household; V nm is the price of each input; L nj represents the number of days of work undertaken in the last 12 months by both the n-th household members (implicit costs) and hired labourers for the j-th activity carried out for banana production and BXW management; W j is the average wage 7 per day for hired workers for the j-th activity; and finally a n are the acres under banana production at the n-th household.Table 6 shows the median costs per acre for BXW management and banana production, sustained by the three different categories.Results from Table 6 show that full adopters incur higher costs of BXW management than low adopters, but the overall costs of the BXW management are quite low (around 10% and 15% of the total costs for the low adopters and full adopters respectively). This could be mainly explained by different factors. First, the initial cost of inputs is low itself, and since all the inputs have a long-life cycle, the cost can be amortized in several years (10 years except for JIK). However, even if the costs can be amortized, the purchases of the inputs can be perceived quite costly by smallholders since the required initial disbursement. Indeed, the cost of inputs represents only about 1% of the total costs for BXW management for low adopters compared to 5.42% of full adopters. The relatively high initial disbursement could explain the very high percentage of low adopters, that, benefitting also from a current low incidence rate of BXW, they mainly try to minimize costs, monitoring mainly the diseased plant.BXW control influences the banana yield, that represents the principal source of benefits between different groups. As a result, in the third step, this study analyzed the market value of banana production for each group (full adopters, low adopters and non-adopters) in order to investigate the benefits for controlling the BXW in monetary terms.Revenues (R) of the generic n-th household (n = 1, … , N) were calculated per acre, based on the following equation (eq. 2):where y nbs and p nbs indicate respectively the production in terms of bunches and the market price for bunch for each bth specific banana variety 8 grown by the n-th households in the s-th season; while a nbs represents the cultivated area in acres.The last step of the current analysis was to calculate the net balance, in terms of difference between the revenues and the costs per acre (P n = R n − C n ) resulting from the production of bananas (only variable costs) and the BXW management (both fixed and variable costs). Net balances were calculated for the three categories and then compared in order to investigate whether the profit is higher for those households who adopted BXW management practices altogether, given the costs they have to sustain in order to apply them. From Table 7 it is possible to observe that revenues obtained are markedly higher for full adopters and low adopters compared to the category of non-adopters. Also, the net balance in the last 12 months was higher within those households who applied the full package of BXW practices, compared to those who applied only one or two practices or those who did not apply any practices. It should be noted that the net balance for non-adopters is negative. This is because they sustained a cost for banana production; however, the incidence of BXW disease has reduced banana yield/ productivity and hence the revenues.Overall, results indicate that the adoption of BXW management practices altogether led to a positive result in terms of the net balance at household level. Indeed, households who applied the full package of practices registered the highest net balance, with a difference of US$65 per acre per year compared to those who have not adopted any practice.Banana production is an important livelihood activity for farmers in Uganda, which has been seriously threatened by BXW since 2001 (Tushemereirwe et al. 2006). The rapid spread of the disease is sometimes attributed to the lack of farmers' awareness of and knowledge about disease diagnosis, transmission, and management (McCampbell et al. 2018). Based both on the AIS framework and the narrative analysis of the qualitative data, this study provides evidence that several stakeholders have made significant investments in order to increase the knowledge and skills of farmers regarding BXW. Among activities implemented in Uganda for this purpose are communication and education campaigns, demonstrations, training and meetings. The interactions between smallholder farmers and other actors of the AIS constitute the main structure of the innovation systems as they facilitate the diffusion and the sustainability of the innovations (Nahuis, Moors, and Smits 2012;Lundvall and Lema 2014;Adejuwon 2019). Indeed, the massive awareness campaign and investments implemented during the last peak of BXW in Uganda led to the positive outcome of critically reducing the number of affected farms in just two years. During 2013 more than 50% of households were affected by BXW, whereas in 2015, after the mobilization of stakeholders, only 1.9% of households showed BXW symptoms in their fields (National Banana Research Program Website 2015). This led to a discontinuation of investments by the government and the various national and international stakeholders. In this way, control of the BXW was entirely entrusted to rural households. This may be the cause of the resurgence of BXW. Alarmingly, the current level of investments remains low and, according to many stakeholders, insufficient to effectively support farmers with BXW control. This denotes that the current linkages between stakeholders are weak, which is compromising the successful implementation of the practices. Ineffective interaction and collaboration between stakeholders are common problems in the AIS in sub-Saharan countries (Schut et al. 2016).The analysis of quantitative data collected at a household level confirms the fact that currently Ugandan households recognize the importance of adopting the recommended practices to contain BXW. In fact, only 5% of the sample did not apply BXW management practices at all, while 95% applied at least one of them. However, only 33% of the sample adopted the full package of the practices, while 62% of the sample adopted only one or two practices. This is a significant obstacle to BXW management, as only all the management practices adopted together is an effective disease control tool (Kubiriba and Tushemereirwe 2014). According to some of the stakeholders interviewed, the direct cost of the inputs (mostly JIK and clean planting materials) is one of the reasons why the farmers do not adopt the integrated package of practices for BXW management. The current study has highlighted that there was a considerable commitment by the government of Uganda to provide inputs for households at a district level, including clean planting material critical to fight BXW. Furthermore, our comparison between non-adopters, low adopters and full adopters of the cultural practices, indicates that full adopters benefit from a median net balance of US$35 per acre per annum. Low adopters recorded a lower net balance, of about US$30 per acre per annum. Finally, non-adopters registered a net loss from the production of bananas (about US$30 per acre). This indicates economic vulnerability of households to BXW effect and stresses the importance of providing support, and information campaigns and training. This is in line with the AIS framework that highlight the importance of interaction and social learning between farmers and other actors of the innovation system (Dolinska and d'Aquino 2016). From this it follows that more emphasis must be directed at education and support of different actors of the system, especially for smallholders.This cost-benefit analysis leads to the conclusion that the integrated package of practices against BXW is not only cost effective, but also adopting the full range of practices generates the highest benefit. Probably, the reason why farmers did not adopt the integrated package of practices for controlling the BXW is that the initial costs of the inputs, even if depreciable in 10 years, can pose an important barrier. In addition to this, the reduction in both public and private investments in the BXW control at the country level, means that local governments cannot afford to support all the activities that should be carried out in order to guarantee a continuous presence of funds and personnel in the field.For these reasons, it is crucial that the government increases the investments in the two major inputs that farm-households struggle to provide themselves, recognized as JIK and clean planting material. Moreover, female-led households who struggle with the adoption of the full package, need to be supported. Finally, the government and other stakeholders of the banana value chain should continue to invest in communication and awareness campaigns about the correct implementation of the practices, emphasizing that it is important to apply them all together. In particular, due to relatively high initial investment needed, it is important to inform the farmers about the distribution of the benefits in time and stress that over time the full package adoption results in the highest net benefit. National government must ensure that households receive the message about the best use of management practices and the profits that will flow from their adoption. To do so, the government should relaunch specific investments for BXW awareness campaigns and other participatory methods. It is important to prevent the next BXW outbreak as it is likely to lead to potentially heavy economic losses among banana producers.No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Notes 1. Removal of diseased plants can be done through the entire mat removal and/or single diseased stem removal (SDSR), although the latter is preferred because it is considered as effective but less labour-intensive. For this reason, the current analysis considered the SDSR as the main technique for removing diseased plants. 2. Key informants are a limited population of individuals with significant breadth and depth of knowledge to speak informatively in detail about what happened and why (Jimenez 1985). 3. An expert meeting held in Kampala, Uganda on the 1st and 2nd of February 2018 was carried out in order to identify key informants. 4. Through the community action, the community is facilitated to develop an action plan for BXW control, and all community members commit to implementing it. Stakeholders at higher levels (local and national government) are then mobilized to support the communities in implementing their plan (Kubiriba et al. 2012).5. Use of clean planting material was excluded from the quantitative analysis because, although it represents another important practice to avoid the dissemination of infected suckers and plantlets, very few farmers use this technique as recommended by scientists due to the high cost and lack of availability. 6. The same practices can be done also utilizing different inputs, but the right way to implement them is through the inputs we listed. That is why we decided to account for the cost analysis of only those inputs recognized as adequate from the literature. 7. Wage for household's members has been calculated as 2/3 of the wage for hired workers. 8. The four varieties of bananas considered are cooking, sweet, roasting, and beer banana."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1620105374.json b/main/part_2/1620105374.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c0a5a45e36b4f87a3e14e9ee95bc0d3c4c23725 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1620105374.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"394b3c087af07563c43c7ecad6b1a95b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/59e9feab-62e3-42da-9566-73ef9b9cbe73/retrieve","id":"-1846532669"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d4c3bb68-26b9-4ea3-9bb8-48f3fd0eca93","content":"This report was produced with support from the CGIAR Initiative Livestock and Climate. We would like to thank all funders who supported this work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund. Between December 2017 and December 2021, the EU-funded Piloting of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) project in Kenya supported two community conservancies: one community forest association and one community rangeland initiative to carry out community resource mapping, rangeland resource rehabilitation, protection and management leading to the rehabilitation of 89,000 hectares of land, one borehole, one spring, and strengthening four community management committees.This was implemented in Mogotio Subcounty (Koitegan), Tiaty (Paka Hills), Marigat (Irong Conservancy), and Baringo North (Kabarion Conservancy). Now this work will be taken up, improved and scaled up under the CGIAR initiative Livestock and Climate (LCSR). This report provides the status of the current sites in order to identify next steps, interventions and supporting research and technical support.The new phase will focus on scaling up and scaling out the PRM project in Baringo and Wajir counties. The activities to be undertaken in the new phase are:• Scoping study to identify locations for new PRM initiatives • Piloting PRM in new sites • Strengthening PRM in already-established sites (Baringo) • Piloting PLUP (Participatory Land Use Planning) • Facilitation of baseline and landscape studies in PRM sites • Research on conflict and land-use An initial status analysis was conducted to understand the current situation on the ground and identify areas for intervention. Key threats to the rangelands include rapid loss of natural vegetation cover and species, soil erosion, overgrazing, uncontrolled bush burning, poor agricultural practices, weak natural resources management institutions and structures, and high poverty levels within the community. Due to the loss of vegetation cover, soil erosion has become a major challenge, especially in the rainy season, largely because of poor cultivation practices and overgrazing around wet grazing areas and watering points and environmental destruction. The main effect of soil erosion is rangeland degradation, specifically the emergence of bare land, big gullies, and poor-quality pastures, and low crop yields.The Koitegan Community Forest lies in a hilly area of approximately 169.2 hectares and serves an estimated population of 15,000. The land around Koitegan is privately owned, leaving the community forest as the only common resource for the community to graze their animals. The community forest also remains the only source through which the community can access rangeland resources including pastures, herbs for human and animal consumption, salt licks, and water. This has led to overgrazing of the natural vegetation. The land is also struggling with invasive species which colonized pastures and grazing areas. Springs and other water sources have also dried up. There is also encroachment into the community forest and its conversion to agricultural uses to satisfy land-use demands from the increasing population and illegal exploitation of forest products for charcoal, poles and logs due to the high demand from the increasing population. In addition, there are signs of soil erosion, deforestation and degradation of habitats from forest fires and invasive species.Koitegan is characterized by low vegetation cover (below 15%) whereas the upper slopes have a vegetation cover of up to 40%, consisting of mainly planted trees, natural trees, grasses and shrubs. Koitegan Community Forest is home to the plant species shown in Table 2 Bushes and grasses are the dominant forest vegetation. These comprise native trees such as lelekwee, tipilikwee, kemelee, yemtit, kipiryokwee, leketetwee, ng'oswee, siryande, soyop eren, kelwonde, sepeltii, leng'nee, chepitee, muyeng'wee and others. Forest species include cypress, pine, blue gum, criphelia, croton, eucalyptus, jacaranda, azadirachta indica (mwarobaini) and acacia.Koitegan Community Forest is the only forest in Mogotio Subcounty. It was under the management of the Deputy County Commissioner until 2017 when it was lawfully registered as a community forest under the Kenya Forest Service and is now managed by Koitegan Community through their Koitegan Community Forest Association (CFA).The community management forest plan is guided by the following objectives:• Raise awareness about farm forestry and improved farming methods.• Promote forest extension and sustainable on-farm nature-based enterprises for household socioeconomic development.• Promote improved farming practices and alternative energy sources.• Encourage soil conservation measures, compositing and household water harvesting.• Promote drought resistance crops and rearing dual-purpose cows for milk and meat (Sahiwal breed).Map 1. Koitegan Community ForestThrough focused leadership of the Community Forest Association and the PRM approach, Koitegan Community Forest can engage all its members in the sustainable use and management of water, trees, and pasture and protect the forest from further environmental degradation.The future security of the forest hinges on effective leadership that will mitigate deforestation and improve resource management. Although the conservancy leadership has made a concerted effort to curtail deforestation by banning charcoal burning, the forest is still recovering from this long-time practice. Peninah, Assistant Chief, Kibomui Sublocation, said, \"I believe that combating deforestation and overgrazing depends on public awareness. Leaders must educate community members about the importance of conservation and what is at stake if resources continue to be poorly managed\".In addition to public education, community members and the CFA have on their wish-list several interventions that will further curb deforestation and improve water availability. These include afforestation, establishing a seedbed for selling seeds and involving the community in replanting efforts, constructing fences around germinating seeds, and investing in tourism to diversify the region's economy and provide alternative livelihood sources. The CFA has proposed to petition the Rift Valley Water Service Board to expand the Kapitoi Dam and put water tanks in place for irrigating seed beds. The conservancy was formed to rally the community to take steps to conserve natural resources and develop nature-based enterprises to benefit current and future generations in the face of rapid ecological degradation, especially the loss of indigenous trees and shrubs that support livestock and wildlife.Chuine Conservancy has historically provided essential services to local communities because it hosts rich and unique biodiversity. S survey carried out in 2009 on spatial variation and the value of ecosystem services rated Chuine second after Lake Bogoria National Reserve in terms of ecosystem and biodiversity richness and importance.However, the area continues to experience many challenges related to rapid changes in land use due to population increase and the impacts of climate change. Specific challenges include:• Overgrazing, which causes further degradation and resource conflicts.• Human-wildlife conflicts intensified by environmental degradation.• The spread of invasive species, which causes resource depletion and biodiversity loss.• Lack of infrastructure in the conservancy area.• Establish grass plots The Kiborgoch Conservancy covers approximately 880 hectares. It acts as a natural sponge by retaining water and moderating its flow and is a habitat for crocodiles and over 300 species of birds. The conservancy is fed by two large warm springs (Lake Bogoria Hotel spring and Chelaba Spring), and a smaller spring (Turtle Spring). This ecosystem has an important role in maintaining biodiversity, recreation, livelihoods and other services for local people.However, few studies have been carried out on its hydrology, biodiversity, and resource use. Some of the vegetation found in the conservancy includes reed, pyprus, acacia , Egyptian balanites, shrubs, prosopis juliflora and grass. There are also several medicinal plants community members have been using to cure diseases such as malaria and the common among others. The conservancy has over six hot springs which serve as a source of water. More research and mapping of these springs needs to be carried out.• Lake Bogoria • Lake Baringo • Lake 94• Kesubo WetlandFive permanent rivers feed the Loboi River and the springs. There are also four seasonal rivers, the Chepkornis, Cheptugen, Kapchepsoiyo and Waseges.Surrounding the conservancy are human activities which include farming in the irrigation schemes in the three locations (Kapkuikui, Tembererwee, and Kamoskoi). The major activities carried out in the schemes include planting Kenyan seed maize, watermelons, onions and pawpaws.• Map, identify, and demarcate the conservancy as communal land to protect it from individually owned farms. • Protect, maintain and conserve the area by planting trees and grass.• Ensure the conservancy has adequate water and grass species throughout the year by rechannelling diverted rivers and springs into the conservancy and controlling and regulating grazing. • Ensure that the wildlife within the conservancy is preserved and there is an amicable coexistence between wildlife and human activities.Irong Conservancy covers an area of 614.5 km divided into subunits. The subunits include;• Irong Hill (approximately 300 acres), a dry grazing area for the community.• Wetlands such as Kapnarok, Majimoto, Kiborgoch and Kamar.• Kaptombes Archaeological Site, a newly discovered site with unique features including all-season grazing areas and wet grazing areas around settlements.Irong Conservancy is endowed with a wide range of natural resources. The rangelands offer multiple services and goods that facilitate pastoralists and agro-pastoralist livelihoods and the general well-being of wildlife. The systems in the rangeland include water systems (seasonal rivers, boreholes and water pans, wetlands and Lake Bogoria). Other resources include pastures, salt licks and grazing areas, forests, and bees for honey production.Irong conservancy has traditionally been managed by community elders. The surrounding land is largely privatized and the community sets aside common grazing areas near wetlands, hills and some private land. There is a common understanding among members about resource sharing.Resources such as dams, boreholes and pastures on individually owned farms are accessible by community members based on this understanding. Irong conservancy is managed by a committee of 17 people drawn from the five locations that make up the entire Irong Conservancy.• Rangeland resource management and improvement Irong Conservancy was rehabilitated to enhance healthy ecosystems that support wildlife, livestock, and human needs while improving the condition of damaged areas with appropriate regeneration measures. The Conservancy is mainly covered by natural vegetation that serves as grazing land and forage for livestock and wildlife. It also supports crop cultivation due to the fertile soils in some areas. RECONCILE seeks to conserve and improve these areas by championing and supporting sustainable land management practices. The Conservancy also has active grazing committees and grazing plans that help determine where and when to graze. The community here is involved in the active restoration of rangelands through the management of invasive species such as Prosopis juliflora.RECONCILE helped develop the rangeland management plan to achieve sustainable grazing and avoid overgrazing. The plan strengthened management and has given people a greater sense of control over their livelihoods. Coming up with the plan has helped the conservancy retain grass banks during the dry season, thus providing opportunities for pastoralists to access good-quality pasture. This has greatly reduced the risk of pasture depletion and subsequent livestock losses and environmental degradation. After the project, some farmers took the initiative of starting pasture production which has so far thrived.RECONCILE installed solar panels and a water pump system for the Tabarweche borehole to replace the old system which was difficult for members to use. The new pump is functional and still in good condition. Photo 6. Constructing the Tabarweche boreholeWhere Sukta spring was found, about 1.2 ha of land was fenced to enhance its protection. This has facilitated the sprouting of another spring in the area and thus the need for protecting it in the next intervention. After the discovery of these springs, water collection chambers were constructed and new livestock routes were created to access the water. The distribution of water troughs to the boreholes of Irong Community Conservancy improved accessibility and availability for livestock and people (Photo 7 and 8).Irong is also known for producing quality honey. RECONCILE supported women's groups with beehives to enhance honey production which has improved income generation at the household level. Several women's groups have taken up honey production since the project ended.Photo 9. Beehives distributed to women's groups Uprooting colonizing species in Lukuru was undertaken by selecting thirty members of the community to physically uproot invasive species. The total area uprooted was 2.5 acres within three days. The cleared land was used for regeneration and planting grass to increase pasture availability within the rangeland as shown in Photo 10.Photo 7. Fenced area around Sukta Photo 8. Sukar spring"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1621425120.json b/main/part_2/1621425120.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..491ade16423e5c3325ce68a3e5f6cec6c99b8f42 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1621425120.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f3d2eb0cf4aad43c330b1ef4a3fe15b4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7569cffe-73dc-4466-9ebf-8f0a8f76b3a5/retrieve","id":"732644374"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3d55a8d1-30eb-48ad-b3a4-e76a4902fb32","content":"Numerous approaches have been developed by researchers for measuring intra-household decisionmaking. Most use quantitative surveys that often rely on a standard set of questions that inquire about who contributes to key household decisions or women's abilities to participate in these decisions. Such questions have been criticized for focusing too much on the identity of the decision maker and less on understanding why and how decisions get made within the household and on the multiple facets of women's roles in decision-making processes 1 . To address the shortcomings of current approaches, we (an interdisciplinary group of applied gender and agriculture researchers) developed a transdisciplinary and mixed-methods approach that can be adapted across livelihoods and geographies to measure intra-household decision making and shed light on the \"who,\" \"why,\" and \"how\" of important household decisions. This guide describes the transdisciplinary process that was used to develop the mixed-methods research tool for understanding and measuring intra-household decision making. In our approach, we focus on measuring who makes which decisions, how, and why and how this influences food, nutrition, and economic security outcomes. This guide, therefore, provides a base for other researchers and development practitioners to develop a context-specific mixed-methods tool for understanding and measuring intra-household decision making. Future users of the tool will be able to explore, in particular, the following research questions:1. Who within the household makes decisions on production, processing, trading, and expenditures? 2. Why does one spouse or the other (or another household member) make certain decisions? 3. What process(es) do couples or other dyads use to make these production-, processing-, trading-and expenditure-related decisions? 4. What types of 'mental tasks' (cognitive labor) are embedded within these decision-making processes? Who is responsible for these mental tasks? Why? 5. How do decision-making processes (who decides, how and why) influence specific food and nutrition security and economic outcomes at household level?The tool was developed in the context of the cassava value chain in Tanzania, focusing on agricultural-and expenditure-related decisions. However, the tool and its development were designed to be flexible, and it has considerable potential to be applied to other types of livelihoods and in other geographies.The development of this mixed-method research tool received human subjects/ethical research approval and appropriate guidelines were followed.This section presents the step-by-step process that was used to develop the Household Mixed-Methods for the Study of decision-Making Research Tool (HOMME-SMART). In Figure 1 we summarize the eight-step process that we used. Breaking down the process into stepsStep 1: Literature reviewWe reviewed the literature to identify the issues and knowledge gaps concerning the measurement of intra-household decision making. The review helped to justify why there is a need to develop a mixed-methods research tool. The following are the key highlights:• While there is wide acceptance of women's empowerment as an important development goal, there is less consensus on how best to measure empowerment across contexts. These concerns are especially salient to quantitative approaches, which often rely on a standard set of questions that inquire about women's abilities to participate in a range of decisions within the household (see Box 1).Box 1. Examples of tools to measure women's involvement in making intra-household decisionsThe Demographic Health Surveys (e.g., see Tanzania DHS-MIS Report, 2016) ask women and men who usually makes decisions on major household purchases, allowing respondents to indicate that decisions are made by the respondent, the respondent's spouse/partner, jointly with the spouse/partner, or other. The project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index asks women and men to indicate, from among the agricultural activities they participate in, which individuals (up to three) normally make the decision on a given activity, how much input they contributed to the decision, and to what extent they could participate (if they currently do not). It does not explore further how decision-making processes unfold and why household members make certain decisions alone or jointly with other members (Malapit et al., 2019).• Questions about women's involvement in decision making within the household have been criticized for numerous reasons, including too much focus on the identity of the decision maker and less on understanding why and how decisions get made within the household and on the multiple facets of women's roles in decision-making processes (Bernard et al., 2020). Asking questions beyond who makes decisions (and to what extent) is especially important given that in many rural, low-income country contexts (especially in Africa) spouses may not pool resources generated from their labor or have the same preferences for how resources get allocated. Asking why and how decisions are made can improve the measurement and understanding of intra-household power dynamics. • Decision-making questions are formulated using outsider (or etic) perspectives on what matters regarding intra-household decision making, and more broadly, women's empowerment (Elias et al., 2021 2 ). Yet, emic (insider) perspectives are a critical source of information and can help inform the development of questions and overall research tools. Step 2: Stakeholder consultationIn the early stages of developing this tool, we consulted with a diverse set of local stakeholders to inform the design of the tool and to gauge their interests in utilizing the proposed tool once developed to better understand and measure intra-household decision making for their research or development programs. We recommend that all projects intending to use this approach also consult relevant stakeholders.Consultations were held with stakeholders in and around the study regions in Tanzania to learn from their experiences and knowledge about intra-household decision making as it relates to their programmatic work and agricultural context. The consultations also assessed the demand for such a tool to understand and measure intra-household decision making. A brief guide was developed to facilitate the discussions with the stakeholders (Annex 1) and was deployed with researchers from the national program who are involved in social and gender research, and practitioners from development organizations.The consultation with stakeholders enabled the research team to identify priority topics for developing the qualitative tool. For example, information from stakeholder consultations enabled the research team to identify the types of interview questions to ask, how to consider other household members in addition to couples, and type of crops to consider (food versus cash crops).The stakeholder interviews also helped us consider important issues, such as the importance of the identity of the decision-maker and the beneficiaries of the decisions. Their recommendations also included the need to address issues of financial accessibility and type of marital relationships and how to handle interviews with polygynous households, for instance. This was specifically taken into consideration during the study where the decision on which of the wives should participate in the study with the husband was left for such households to decide on their own.Step 3: Designing the dyadic interview discussion guideThe literature review and stakeholder consultations informed the development of the qualitative discussion guide, which was used when jointly interviewing dyads on intra-household decision making. The process of developing the dyadic interview guide involved back-and-forth discussions among research team members while keeping the key research questions in mind. The first section of the discussion guide seeks to explore \"who does what and why\" and \"who decides and why\" with regards to different agricultural tasks within the (in our case) cassava value chain, and the second part covers the \"how couples make decisions,\" \"why,\" and \"cognitive labor\" questions. The questions on the use of cognitive labor were developed based on the framework by Daminger (2019 6 ). According to this framework, cognitive labor may entail:1. Anticipating the need to do something 2. Identifying options to completing it 3. Making decisions to pursue it 4. Monitoring the results from making the decisionIn addition, at the start of the discussion guide there is a section inquiring about basic demographic information and the household's involvement in cassava value chain activities. A couple of other questions inquire about subjective and relative livelihood status.The semi-structured interviews were designed in a format that allowed the same issues to be discussed with multiple decision-making dyads (e.g., married couple or a woman heading her household who resides with an adult daughter or son). The open-ended questions allowed participants to respond in their own words, and the interviewer could frame follow-up questions as necessary based on responses.To aid comprehension and improve response quality, the discussion guide also allowed participants to demonstrate their answers with beans in questions requiring estimates of proportions or percentages. Also, cards with images that depicted specific cassava production, processing, and trading tasks associated with decision-making questions were developed and included in the guide (see in Annex 2). The purpose of developing these cards and including them into the tool was to enable dyads to visualize specific activities they engage in and help trigger discussions with them while providing the opportunity for the research team to better understand who within the household carries out the different cassava value chain tasks, who makes final decisions on such tasks, and why.Once the discussion guide was finalized, it was piloted. A research protocol that describes all aspects of study procedures and research plan was developed. The protocol highlights the research objectives, main research questions, specifies study area and describes the approach to participant selection as described in Step 4 below. It also explains the composition of the field research team and how team members are to be trained. In addition, the protocol describes how data will be handled and analyzed and lists expected study outputs.Step 4: Piloting of the qualitative dyadic interviewsPrior to piloting the qualitative dyadic interviews, the field team was trained on the discussion guide and study protocol. The field team was responsible for translating the discussion guides and consent forms into Kiswahili (the language in which the interviews were conducted). They also developed a qualitative data entry/note taking sheet and practiced administering the interviews.Once the training was completed, the discussion guide was pretested with a few dyads to assess it for clarity and relevance prior to conducting the pilot. The assessment also entailed checking for length of interview (time needed to complete the interview) and ease of asking questions. The feedback from the pretest helped in modifying the final version.We conducted in-depth interviews with 40 married/cohabiting couples and other dyads (20 interviews in each of the two study regions). Before the research team travelled to the pilot study area, respective local governments at regional and district levels were informed about the study through official letters. Upon arrival, the research team paid courtesy calls, and, in each district, an extension officer was designated to work with the research team during the entire period of data collection. The extension officer served as both local contact and liaison between the research team and study participants.The protocol for conducting interviews with couples and other dyads entailed first an introduction by the research team (1 woman and 1 man who took turns interviewing and taking notes) and second obtaining the informed consent of both study participants. All the interviews were audio recorded. The target couples and dyads for the study were those who lived together and who participated in cassava value chain activities, and therefore, made cassava production, processing, and/or trading decisions along with key expenditure-related decisions together or separately within their households. The couples and other dyads who comprised the qualitative study sample included:1. Married/cohabiting couples (often, men as heads of households but not always, and including monogamous and polygynous couples) 2. Women as heads of households, not married but living with their adult female or male child(ren)/dependents (> 18 years or older)In polygynous households, the research team did not ask to speak with multiple wives and their husband, but rather, they were asked to organize themselves according to how they wish to present themselves. In most cases, the husband decided who among his wives would participate in the interview.Concerning the latter dyad type, very few dyads who met this profile were identified during the study. In many cases, a woman heading her household and not married was living with a child or children under the age of 18, which were unable to be interviewed given the human subjects requirements, and importantly were likely not responsible for making significant decisions in the household.Step 5: Analysis of the qualitative dyadic interviews and vignette developmentOnce the qualitative dyadic interviews were completed, the recordings of the interviews were transcribed and translated into English and then were added into the ATLAS.ti software for analysis.Prior to the analysis, a coding structure (Figure 2), which included inductive and deductive codes, was developed by conducting a preliminary analysis of select transcripts. The coding structure is based on a process framework for decision making and potential inputs into that process. The analysis resulted in 80 individual decision-making patterns, two each from the 40 interviewed couples and other dyads. That is, for each interview, two different patterns in terms of visualizations (see Figure 3 as an example) were developed to represent agriculture-and expenditure-related decisions, respectively. Thereafter, research team members (2 women, 2 men) came together for an analysis workshop to analyze the different patterns/visualizations. During the workshop, the visualizations were printed and similar decision-making patterns were grouped together. This process resulted in the identification of seven main decision-making patterns, which informed the development of seven vignettes 7 (see in Annex 3) on how agriculture-and expenditure-related decisions are made amongst married/cohabiting couples, each stemming from a decision-making pattern. The short stories for each of the decision-making patterns were developed using the content contained in the visualizations of the individual patterns within the seven decision-making pattern groupings. Thereafter, the patterns were ready for validation in the study regions.7 A vignette is a short story lasting one to two minutes that is verbally presented during a qualitative or quantitative interview to illustrate a difficult concept or process and enable interviewees to respond in a more precise and comfortable manner, especially when the topic under study is relatively sensitive (e.g., decision making within the household). Thus, a vignette serves as both a stimulus and aid to encourage respondents to discuss their thoughts more openly.Additionally, it is worth noting that although there were a few other types of dyads (motherson/mother-daughter dyads) apart from couples, for this study we did not focus on their decisionmaking patterns, because they comprised only a small portion of the sample. Thus, the patterns reflect those of married/cohabiting couples only.Step 6: Validation of the vignettes (decision-making patterns)Once the vignettes were developed, we validated them in the two study regions using drama skits and Focus Group Discussion (FGDs). Doing so allowed us to consult people within a select number of communities on whether the vignettes represent real-life scenarios of couples making agricultureand expenditure-related decisions. First, scripts for the drama skits were developed by a local script writer and reviewed by the research team (see Annex 4). Then, a drama group was identified, and the scripts were provided to the group for rehearsing.The drama skits were performed in the study districts where qualitative data collection was conducted. The skits were followed by FGDs. This took place in two study areas (where qualitative data were collected) and one in a non-study area. In total, nine FGDs were conducted, each comprising six participants. In each of the three districts, there was one mixed-sex FGD, and two separate-sex FGDs (1 women only, 1 men only). The participants of the FGDs comprised representatives of married/cohabiting women and men, including those in monogamous and polygynous relationships. In each case the drama group acted out the different drama skits while FGD participants watched. During the FGDs, a guide was used to facilitate the discussion and the research team took notes using a prepared data collection sheet.Photo 1: Validating the vignettes using drama and focus group discussions in Kagera and Kigoma regions, Tanzania. Photo credit: Gloriana Ndibalema.In addition to FGDs, a brief key informant interview, with a researcher based in the region at the Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute who is considered an expert on the topic of intra-household decision making, was conducted to receive feedback on the vignettes. The printed and laminated vignette description cards were presented to the key informant who read and provided their comments based on guiding questions.The validation process indicated that all the seven vignettes represented the decision-making scenarios in the study area, although certain patterns were found to be more/less dominant across the study communities.After the validation process, the seven vignettes were ready to be embedded into the household survey.Step 7: Quantitative survey module developmentIn this step we developed a module that was designed to be embedded in a multi-topic household survey. The decision-making module was, to a great extent, informed by findings from the qualitative study.Two main decision-making modules were developed. The first module was on who makes decisions within the household, how and why. Following a discussion (and analysis) it was determined that eight questions on decision-making topics related to production, processing, marketing, and expenditure would be asked. These topics were selected based on decisions perceived by couples and other dyads to be important during the qualitative study and allowed us to focus on matters that are important and have meaning to individuals/couples. The vignettes on the decision-making patterns were included in this first decision-making module. Questions were developed around the vignettes. Illustrations for each decision-making pattern were developed and printed on cards to help with understanding the vignettes during implementation of this module.The research team also had to decide which potential response options to include to address the \"why\" questions in this module. The responses on why decisions are made by one individual or jointly were grouped based on their similarities. The groupings for why decisions get made by one spouse or the other included:1. Contributes the most resources, income, or labor to the activity 2. Is the head of household 3. Introduced the idea 4. Makes decisions about this and I make decisions about other things 5. Is the most knowledgeable about this activityThe groupings for why decisions get made jointly included:1. Both agree on/support the decision 2. Both contribute resources, income, or labor to the activity 3. All decisions on the topic are made togetherThe research team also had to decide which questions to include in this first decision-making module on cognitive labor. These included questions on monitoring and evaluation of the outcome(s) from household's decisions about different agriculture-and expenditure-related topics. Other aspects of cognitive labor like anticipation of the need to do something and identifying options or making sole or joint decisions were embedded in the vignettes that were part of the module.The second decision-making module was developed to collect data on participation in specific activities related to the decision-making questions asked in the other module.In addition to the two decision-making modules we developed, several other modules were developed or pulled from existing resources. Modules on background characteristics covered household characteristics, asset ownership, group participation, and access to extension services and finance. We also included modules on the key outcomes that we expected to be associated with different decision-making patterns. These included dietary diversity, food security, and cassava production and productivity and sales.See Annex 5 for the quantitative tool.Step 8: Piloting of the quantitative survey with the decision-making modulePrior to the commencement of quantitative data collection, an enumerator training was organized.The training comprised different activities including review and digitization of the quantitative tool.The enumerators also practiced administering the survey in preparation for the pretest, which was conducted after the training. After receiving data from the pretest, the tool was refined, and a few modifications were made to it as necessary.Photo 2: Survey practice during training in Kagera Region, Tanzania. Photo credit: Devis Mwakanyamale.After the revision of the quantitative household survey, including the decision-making module, it was administered in a large household survey. It was administered to a total of 1352 randomly selected households (or couples). In half of the sample (joint interview sample), spouses were interviewed together for all the modules except for the one on dietary diversity. For this module, only the wife was interviewed. In the other half of the sample (separate interview sample), spouses were interviewed together from the beginning of the survey, but then were interviewed separately for the two decision-making modules. Again, only the wife was interviewed for the module on minimum dietary diversity. The decision to conduct the interviews using these two approaches aimed at assisting the research team to examine the issue of heterogeneity in the interpretation of who makes decision within the household as identified in the literature review. For example, studies show the need for new research tools that can reduce differences in reporting of decision making between spouses by improving how decision-making questions are formulated and asked (Ambler et al., 2017).Annex: Mixed-methods research tool for measuring and understanding intra-household decision making The purpose of stakeholder consultation is to inform the design of the tool and to gauge the interests of local stakeholders in utilizing the proposed tool once developed to better understand and measure intra-household decision making for their research or development programs.1. Looking at your target communities/project participants, what are the main agricultural crops that they grow? (Establish a cassava or other crop focus based on information provided) 2. We would now like to focus on how husbands and wives take decisions on agricultural matters in your target communities: Are these kinds of decisions part of the work at your organization? Why have you decided to make household decision-making part of your work? What is problematic about household-decision making in your eyes? 3. Are you aware of any successful strategies to transform household decision-making towards more equity? In the stakeholder's own organization? Observed in other organizations' work? 4. What are the challenges you have encountered in your work on household decision-making?How could these be coped with? 5. What is your demand in terms of tools for understanding, measuring, and transforming household decision-making? 6. Do you conduct surveys to understand agricultural and social development challenges that your organization can address? How? What are your experiences? 7. Do you consult the literature for the design of an intervention? How? How useful is that? 8. Do you use behavior change communication in your work? How? Why? Examples 9. What should we consider when developing the vignettes? Is it a good strategy to validate the vignettes through drama skits? Would you be interested in learning about the process? What would make the vignettes/skits suitable to your needs? 10. What should we consider when developing the survey tool? What would make it suitable to your needs? 11. Would you like to be kept informed about our work including outputs? The purpose of this section is to understand broadly what nodes of the value chain the household participates in and to what extent to understand better whether the household produces cassava primarily as a food or cash crop (or both), processes cassava only for food or for sale (or both), trades cassava in small or larger quantities or not at all. In addition, we are interested in understanding if the household diet is cassava based or cassava is consumed together with other staples or not at all (e.g., only grown as a cash crop). In this section, we are not interested in learning about all the production-, processing-, or trading-related tasks the household (or its members) engage in, and who does which tasks, but rather trying to understand which nodes the household participates in and the purpose of engaging in each node for food or cash (or both) reasons.1.a. Ask the dyad, \"Does your household [produce/cultivate OR process OR trade] cassava?\" Document whether the household produces and/or processes and/or trades cassava. Part A. Intra-household decision making (who and why)1. Determining who within the household carries out cassava value chain activities, who makes the decisions on cassava value chain related matters and whyIn this section, we will draw on the responses above in the section entitled, 'Participation in cassava value chain activities and to what extent'. We will use their responses in this section to determine the setup of the participatory exercise with the dyad.Based on your responses above on the types of activities your household participates in and the extent of this participation, we would like to take you through an exercise to help us better understand who within the household carries out specific cassava production, processing, and trading/marketing tasks, and who makes the decisions on these matters and why. We will follow several steps to help you both respond to the questions we ask during the exercise. Please work together to respond to these questions. Please feel free to discuss while answering the questions, there are no right or wrong answers.Steps in the exercise to follow by asking specific questions or guiding the dyad through the process. Note: Document the five tasks they chose.*See draft cards in Annex A. ^Note, the dyad could identify all tasks as being 'higher' or all tasks as being 'lower' level of importance. This would influence how the process flows from then on. †Note, in some cases there will be < 5 tasks, and thus proceed with asking the three questions (in 4.b) for all tasks. In other cases, the dyad only engages in activities in the production node and then proceed to 4.b for those five tasks that are most important. But in other cases, there will be very few tasks regarded as higher-level of importance and then proceed to 4.b for those tasks. Finally, if the dyad engages in all nodes of the value chain and in many/all tasks, ask them to choose 3, 1, and 1 tasks in the production, processing, and trading nodes, respectively OR if the dyad engages in two nodes (e.g., production and processing/trading), then ask them to choose 4 and 1 tasks in the production and processing/trading nodes, respectively.2. Expenditure-related roles, responsibilities, and decision making within the household 1. Who is responsible for holding the income after you sell your cassava products?Who makes the final decision on how the income is used from your cassava sales?Why is this person in charge of making this decision or why does this decision get made jointly together?Who makes the final decision on which foods to purchase?Why is this person in charge of making this decision or why does this decision get made jointly together? 3. Who is primarily responsible for distributing food amongst different household members? Who makes the final decision on how much food is distributed to different household members? Why is this person in charge of making this decision or why does this decision get made jointly together? 4. Who is primarily responsible for purchasing the farming inputs needed to produce cassava (e.g., fertilizer or tools and equipment)?Who makes the final decision on whether to purchase farming inputs to produce cassava?Why is this person in charge of making this decision or why does this decision get made jointly together? 5. Who is primarily responsible for purchasing household items of larger value (e.g., mattress, sofa, bicycle or motorcycle, television, etc.) Who makes the final decision on what larger household items get purchased?Why is this person in charge of making this decision or why does this decision get made jointly together? 6. Who is primarily responsible for accessing financial loans and services? Determine if formal or informal loans are typically obtained (e.g., from a bank versus VICOBA) Who makes the final decision on whether to access financial loans and services?Why is this person in charge of making this decision or why does this decision get made jointly together? Part B. Intra-household decision making (the process and the use of cognitive labor) 1. The process dyads use to make important decisions on cassava production and postharvest related matters and the cognitive labor they use 8Based Were there any concerns or issues that arouse during this interview concerning the topics we brought up and their relevance? Where there any specific issues that made you uncomfortable or that could help us improve the questionnaire? 5. Do you think it is preferable to make decisions together or alone? Which types of decisions and why? 6. How do you feel now that you had these discussions? - ------------------------------------------------------------Thank the dyad for participating in the interview. Ask each person how they are feeling after participating in the interview. Remind each person that if they wish to contact anyone on the research team, that the contact information is available in the informed consent form that was provided to them.Production-related task cards and associated decision-making questions Draw on the above responses in the guide on household participation in cassava value chain activities to specify food versus cash crop OR both. *Products could include fresh roots, cassava flour or dried cassava chips. To be determined when asking about this task.Vignette A: Husband shares idea, discusses with wife, and husband makes the final decisionThe husband realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made regarding [X]. The husband shares his idea with his wife, and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the wife confirms she is supportive of the idea and/or suggests an alternative option that the husband considers before he makes the final decision.The wife realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made. The wife shares her idea with her husband, and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the husband confirms he is supportive of the idea and/or alternative options from either the husband or wife are considered before the husband makes the final decision.Vignette C: Husband shares idea, discusses with wife, and they make a joint final decisionThe husband realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made. The husband shares his idea with his wife, and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the wife confirms she is supportive of the idea and/or suggests an alternative option that the husband considers before the husband and wife make a joint final decision.The wife realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made.The wife shares her idea with her husband, and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the husband confirms he is supportive of the idea and/or suggests an alternative option that the wife considers before the wife and husband make a joint final decision.The wife realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made.The wife shares her idea with her husband, and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the husband confirms he is supportive of the idea and/or the wife considers an alternative option from her husband before she makes the final decision.The husband realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made. After sharing his idea with his wife, he makes the final decision. Mr. NYAMWALA: Alright! Now, as soon as the rains begins, we will start farming. We will use the two acres of land that are close to our maize field. I will follow up with our extension officer about where to get clean seeds of improved cassava varieties. So, get prepared for the work, okay? Mrs. It's okay my husband (Mr. NYAMWALA and his wife, agree to start cassava cultivation from next spring to address the effects of climate change).After the harvest season, one day Mrs. Tumbo meets Mrs. Nyamwala at the well and asks her how it is they do not complain about hunger in the village when the situation is bad for most people.Mrs. TUMBO: My husband, I have something that troubles me. In my home the situation is dire, and hunger has gripped every corner. But why doesn't your family complain, and you never go to ask for free corn from the local government? Mrs. NYAMWALA: My husband and I decided to focus on cassava farming and now things are not so bad. We get enough food and a little surplus that we sell other people to earn additional income. Mrs. TUMBO: Wow! I didn't know that secret. So, when I get home, the first thing I do is share it with my husband. (They said goodbye to one another and returned home while Mrs. TUMBO intending to share with her husband about expanding cassava cultivation) Mrs. TUMBO: My husband! Where are you? Mr. TUMBO: I'm in the kitchen madam! Why are you calling out so loud? Mrs. TUMBO: My husband, there is something I want to share with you. Mr. TUMBO: What is that thing that drives you crazy this evening? Mrs. TUMBO: You know what, our friends Mr. and Mrs. Nyamwala are not hungry this year. Mr. TUMBO: Let me come closer! Mrs. TUMBO: I asked his wife, she said they worked hard on cassava, and they now have sufficient food. In fact, my husband, I wish we could also expand our cassava farm this coming season. Mr. TUMBO: My wife, you told me something very important today. This idea was brought by Mr. Samanga but I ignored it. I didn't know Mr. Nyamwala took it seriously. Mrs. TUMBO: Yes, my husband. They decided to act on the idea and have reaped the benefits of their decision. Why can't we also expand cassava production? We haven't used that other farm for the past three years. Its soil is suitable for cassava production. Mr. TUMBO: (After pondering for a while) I see! It's true my wife. There is a need for us to increase the size of cassava farm and use improved seed. That way, we will harvest more and curb the problem of food shortage. Mrs. TUMBO: Sure! Mr. TUMBO: So, I have decided that this coming season, we will expand our cassava field.It has been five years since the people of Kazamoyo became involved in cassava farming. Cassava production benefits them greatly and some villagers decide to get involved in livestock keeping. On the way to the farm, Mrs. MASAPA shares something with her husband.Mrs. MASAPA: My husband! Mr. MASAPA: Yes, my wife, what do you want to say? Mrs. MASAPA: You know we have been farming all these years and made a lot of money. I was thinking we should start raising goats now. How do you feel about that, my dear? Mr. MASAPA: I am sure you are aware that I don't like to get involved with the livestock. Your idea is good, but if you want to start that project be certain that you will be responsible of taking care of the goats, not me! Mrs. MASAPA: Don't worry, I will take charge of the project dear. But if I may ask, are you afraid of animals or it is just a disgust? Mr. MASAPA: Oh my gosh! Everyone has their own preferences. You go do some research and consult a vet officer then you will let me know how much it costs. I will support you with the start-up cost, including the cost of the shed. Mrs. MASAPA: I have done some research on the costs and other requirements related to goat farming already. Mr. MASAPA: Oooh, you had gone that far already Mrs. MASAPA: Yes, my husband. I went to Mrs. Othman and found out they have many goats and shared with me the costs of how to start goat farming. Here is the breakdown. Mr. MASAPA: Mh! So, you are this serious! Okay, tell me, what is your though now? Mrs. MASAPA: I have decided we will raise the goats. The cost is not high as you have seen. So, I will manage them well and you will see the results. (Mrs. Masapa concludes the discussion by deciding to manage the entire project and her husband trusted her and supported her financially and with ideas).Mr. Kipwipwi and his family have been engaged in cassava cultivation for a long time even before cassava experts arrived in Kazamoyo village. Currently, he is not satisfied with the production of the crop despite the field being large.Mr. KIPWIPWI: (Leaning down, thinking deeply) All this big field I harvest only a handful, why should we waste our energy on this big farm? I think something must change. (Mr. Kipwipwi shares his thoughts with his wife) Mr. Kipwipwi: My wife Mrs. KIPWIPWI: Yes, my husband. Mr. KIPWIPWI: Our cassava harvest is not proportional to the size of the farm. I have made up my mind that next season we will grow cassava on two acres only instead of the five Mrs. KIPWIPWI: Okay Mr. KIPWIPWI: So, we will use the remaining 3 acres for other crops like beans and maize Mrs. KIPWIPWI: Okay (Mr. Kipwipwi decides to reduce the size of cassava farm). Now we will read some stories about how couples make a decision on this topic.We will also show you pictures that illustrate how couples make a decision on this topic.After hearing these stories and looking at the pictures, we will ask you which couple is the most similar in how you make decisions.Among the couples that you resemble, which is the MOST similar to your couple?What is the MOST important reason why [YOU/YOUR HUSBAND/YOUR WIFE] generally make the final decisions about [X]?What is the MOST important reason why you and your husband/wife make the final decisions about [X] jointly together?HUSBAND The husband realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made regarding [X] decision topic. The husband shares his idea with his wife and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the wife confirms she is supportive of the idea and/or suggests an alternative option that the husband considers before he makes the final decision.The wife realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made regarding [X] decision topic. The wife shares her idea with her husband and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the husband confirms he is supportive of the idea and/or 59 alternative options from either the husband or wife are considered before the husband makes the final decision.The husband realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made regarding [X] decision topic. The husband shares his idea with his wife and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the wife confirms she is supportive of the idea and/or suggests an alternative option that the husband considers before the husband and wife make a joint final decision.Wife shares idea, discusses with husband, and they make a joint final decisionThe wife realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made regarding [X] decision topic. The wife shares her idea with her husband and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the husband confirms he is supportive of the idea and/or suggests an alternative option that the wife considers before the wife and husband make a joint final decision.The wife realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made regarding [X] decision topic. The wife shares her idea with her husband and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the husband confirms he is supportive of the idea and/or the wife considers an alternative option from her husband before she makes the final decision.The husband realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made regarding [X] decision topic. The husband shares his idea with his wife and they discuss jointly about the idea. After discussing, the wife confirms she is supportive of the idea and/or suggests an alternative option that the husband considers before the wife makes the final decision.The husband realizes something needs to happen or a decision needs to be made regarding [X] decision topic. After sharing his idea with his wife, he makes the final decision.Production -(1) which variety to plant in your main cassava plot; (2) Which area of land should be devoted to the main cassava production; (3) when to harvest cassava from your main plot Processing -(4) how to process the cassava from your main plot Trading - (5) where to sell cassava from your main plot or how much cassava to sell from your main plot Expenditure -(6) building/refurbishing a house; (7) paying school fees I am interested in whether you had the food items I will mention even if they were combined with other foods. For example, if you had a soup made with carrots, potatoes and meat, you should reply \"yes\" for each of these ingredients when I read you the list. However, if you consumed only the broth of a soup, but not the meat or vegetable, do not say \"yes\" for the meat or vegetable.As I ask you about foods and drinks, please think of foods and drinks you had as snacks or small meals as well as during any main meals. Please also remember foods you may have eaten while preparing meals or preparing food for others. Please do not include any food used in a small amount for seasoning or condiments (like chilies, spices, herbs or fish powder). "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1632346645.json b/main/part_2/1632346645.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c09b793115a5af74aa7e9ca246a5dafa54d5838 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1632346645.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0969b5019bf2df79685bd94d4148772d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5c8e0ac5-e8ff-474d-9db7-794ec4d396bb/retrieve","id":"-123336687"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d5600b79-2654-43a3-a1de-1208041afdb6","content":"Fund%Council% ! 12 th %Meeting%(FC12)-Brussels,%Belgium% November%4>5,%2014% % ! ! !The ISPC provided a commentary on the 27 th of June 2014 on the extension proposal for CRP 1.3 Aquatic Agricultural Systems (AAS) for 2015-2016. The ISPC noted in that commentary that \"the CRP responds to the reform vision of the CGIAR [in attempting to] deliver direct impacts for the poor\"; and the CRP was \"an example of research in development\". The ISPC commentary also sensed that, at least from the text presented, the CRP had shifted its emphasis from a systems program working principally to improve livelihoods and resource conditions for those poor dependent upon aquatic and agricultural resources towards an experiment in development process. The ISPC felt that this represented an excessive shift away from bio-technical innovation research. The ISPC critique therefore focussed on three major concerns: 1) much more attention is needed on the issue of how the CRP adds value to research particularly the pipeline of biophysical technologies being developed in the commodities CRPs; 2) there should be plans for collecting panel data and counter factual designs implemented with some urgency so that the program might be able to determine its impacts (and to some extent the experimental proof of concept for the program itself); 3) that expansion to further hubs (geographical foci) should remain on hold until such time as a more credible case can be made that the investments in the existing sites have delivered results.The AAS CRP has responded (22 nd of August 2014) with a revised version of the extension proposal, which contains substantial additional material and to more thoroughly explain its perspectives both through the proposal as well as a management response addressed to the ISPC (and a separate response to the Consortium Office).Overall, the AAS revised proposal offers a significant improvement over the initial submission. There is much more detail in a number of dimensions, and the proposal overall appears responsive to the previous ISPC commentary. As was true of our previous comments, we acknowledge the ambition of the research program that AAS has undertaken. The CRP has shown a willingness to take a calculated risk by departing from the conventional approaches to research and by placing a major bet on development-oriented research. The new proposal makes it explicit that one of the major research questions for this CRP is about the effectiveness of their alternate model of research engagement. The theories of change that they are proposing are quite clear, the measures and IDOs and the target locations for research are described.The supporting documentation for the extension proposal, represented in the annexes, adds detail on AAS beneficiaries IDO targets and indicators; valuation designs for AAS; thematic research questions being pursued across program hubs; the engagement of CGIAR Centers in AAS and linkages with other CRPs and more specifics on the collaboration between AAS and L&F, A4NH and WLE. Some items that were previously discussed only in the annexes have been moved to the body of the document. The gender section is now particularly strong, and it shows a multi-faceted commitment to a gender strategy that extends from human resources issues all the way to gender norms and roles, and differential impacts on women as farmers.However, for the reasons given below, the ISPC continues to consider the AAS CRP as an experiment in development. Rather than assuming that the program approach will automatically be successful and scalable, the ISPC considers that progress towards the proposed development outcomes will be difficult to measure by the means described or allow gains to be attributed easily to the approach of the program. The development experiment needs to be tested in a proof of concept approach. From the CGIAR portfolio standpoint, the approach and the rationale espoused by AAS is to some extent divorced from addressing aquatic agricultural systems and livelihoods per se and could have been combined (possibly with other providers) in other agro-ecological systems. From this perspective, the costs of a proof of concept testing of the approach appear to be high and increasing. It was also difficult for the ISPC to assess the quality of other aspects of aquatic resources and systems science from the revised proposal and the ISPC notes that the program evaluation of AAS is currently in progress. The ISPC thus recommends that the FC approves support for the AAS CRP for the extension period. This should allow for further testing of the CRP's approach and metrics within its current five hubs only. The report of the independent evaluation of AAS should be used to help determine the nature of the future call for a research approach to aquatic agricultural systems and its geographic scope.The ISPC's remaining comments focus on where the proposal still apparently leaves questions.Section 2 of the new proposal does describe more of the aims of science to be conducted at the geographical foci/hubs (pp 5-7) and section 6 provides an outline workplan for 2015 and 2016 in terms of major outputs. One can work back from the outputs to infer what sort of research might be involved but many of the outputs are reports and assessments which look more as though they are setting the scene for intervention, and this document is almost silent about the specifics of the technology packages that will be introduced and the technologies that might be developed as part of the CRP. Particularly revealing in this regard is the detailed Annex 6, which spells out the nature of collaborative arrangements between AAS and other CRPs. In this Annex, the entirety of the AAS involvement appears to be in social science, gender analysis, and perhaps nutrition analysis. The presentation therefore is not ultimately of a CRP that intends to engage very heavily in natural science; instead, it aims to be a broker between farm communities and researchers.This may be a reasonable strategy, but it is also curious as AAS is based in a lead Center that has extensive aquatic resource experience in several of the hubs. It appears to be a maintained assumption that research has already delivered the requisite technologies to achieve impact. Indeed, given the time lags of new research, this CRPwhich has defined its goals in terms of development impacts -is effectively making an assumption that the needed technologies are already available and ready for use. This seems like a strong assumption, not well supported by examples or evidence.The proposal is silent also as to the nature of the engagements with communities. Perhaps they already have enough experience in diagnostics, community organizing, and promoting collective action that there are well-defined approaches that they will follow. But there is not much discussion of the ways in which these methods will be researched or refined; even on these issues, the research agenda seems to be subordinated to an implementation agenda.A second point of concern is the rather vague treatment of impact assessment and counterfactuals. Since the CRP is to focus primarily on delivering development outcomes, and since the principal measures of its success will be changes in measurable IDOs, it is reasonable to ask how the impact of the CRP will be distinguished from the background changes taking place in the areas where AAS is active. We applaud the mention of monitoring change in some comparable sites, but there is no real discussion of how this will be used to think about counterfactuals. For instance, many of the targeted measures of success should probably be redefined in terms of incremental effects relative to some counterfactual group.For example, rather than counting the number of people experiencing income growth of over x%, it would seem important to compare this outcome with what is achieved in sites where AAS is not active. We suggest that these measures be altered to reflect this kind of comparative achievement; e.g., number of people experiencing income growth relative to those experiencing the same income growth in comparable locations without project activity. In short, impacts need to be measured relative to some plausible counterfactual. In this case, that would be the non-project locations.Work is still required on aspects of measurement: Even before the program can address impacts, the more proximal outputs are still cast as \"opportunities identified.., regional consensus.., capacities improved..\" etc. Several useful foresight studies or assessments of aquatic agricultural technologies are also anticipated. There are thus a mixture of learning, tools, processes and capacities expected from the work in the extension period. However, there are still a number of remaining challenges in developing IDO change indicators (table 1.3), particularly related to future options and the feasibility of measuring a number of the \"enabling\" IDOs, such as capacity to adapt. For instance, the feasibility and reliability of measuring \"efficiency\" may also be one of the experiments being undertaken by this CRP. However, some agreement on acceptable measures is needed as the M&E proposed practises are listed in the anticipation that there would be a three yearly update to measure change and to evaluate program performance.Another key issue that the revised proposal still does not address is the sustainability and scalability of the effects that may be achieved in target locations. Because the CRP envisions intensive interventions in a small number of locations, it is reasonable to ask about the costs of the interventions in relation to the number of people benefiting. A quick glance at Table 2 makes the point clear. This table envisions achieving income benefits for 200,000 households by 2019. But at a budget that might run to USD200 million by that time, that does not seem like a large number of beneficiaries. Much will depend on the ability of the CRP to scale up the impacts that are achieved in the communities that are at the center of the AAS effort. This is acknowledged and discussed in the proposal, but we flag this as an important concern. It is not only an issue of money and resources, but of capacity more broadly. The teams from AAS cannot deliver this kind of intensive intervention at scale, so they will need to partner with (and perhaps to train) teams from governments and NGOs. There is little discussion in the proposal of how best this can be done.This observation is also relevant to the revised proposal's rationale for extending to new sites. The choice of Myanmar and lower Volta region of Ghana is attractive thinking of the importance of aquatic-resource-based livelihoods, but the proposal highlights, instead, the opportunity to bring in additional CRPs for work in these areas. The ISPC again asks if the program will have the staff-power to do detailed social mapping and building of an enabling context (a key part of the program's concept of scaling) in 7 parts of the globe simultaneously.Overall, the proposal has made an ambitious attempt to place development at the center of the research agenda. Indeed, one could almost see this not as a CGIAR Research Program but as a CGIAR Development Program. That is not a criticism, but a comment that AAS may need to be viewed and judged by slightly different criteria from other CRPs. This CRP is arguably an experiment in itself, and the outcome of the experiment may have much to teach the rest of the CGIAR. There are also some very specific and important questions being asked of aquatic agricultural livelihood systems on the way (Annex 3) which should be highlighted for answer in the shorter term and which will add value to the conduct of the CRP."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1641649220.json b/main/part_2/1641649220.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f97d5ddc3f628ada95ec6a670157e33a0525fe0 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1641649220.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9e304f4da998ac627f49203430c91e51","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/cad934a8-9c6f-4b6a-8727-1198963cfa73/retrieve","id":"824073750"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"34d17466-4d90-4755-a120-ad031cd5f185","content":"menos opciones para Ecuador Evolución del area sembrada con fríjol en Jalisco, México fuente: Lépiz 2002 0 1966 2001 fríjol associado con maíz siembra total de fríjol ,000 Ha menos opciones para México De las 76 especies descritas, 3 'faltantes' (?) : P. leptophyllus (1789) P. purpusii (1911) P. smilacifolius (1895) menos opciones para el fríjol La sexta extinción está progresando rápido si las cosas siguen igual como ahora: si actuamos, la pérdida puede reducirse a la mitad 20% de especies de plantas y animales desaparecen antes fuente: E.O. Wilson 50% de especies de plantas y animales desaparecen antes aumentar la productividad encontrar nuevas opciones encontrar resistencias rfg mejorar la calidadPor qué se ha recurrido a los rfg? Por qué se recurrirá?Qué nos enseña el caso del IR36 ?•Genes de interés vienen de variedades tanto modernas como tradicionales•Genes de interés vienen de varias areas geográficas sin poder predecir•Genes de interés vienen tanto de la especie en mejora que de otras•La fecha de desarrollo de las mismas no parece determinante•Genes de resistencia al GSMV vienen unicamente de Oryza nivara "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1649527436.json b/main/part_2/1649527436.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2451d7b450711d610c93b5a0f75d106aa8b6ff71 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1649527436.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"bade91a816c13e3f87f6c95934681314","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/40df60a5-b01b-4e1f-9bf5-8ad48fe6f46d/retrieve","id":"-2007676400"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3b7be6b5-9026-4708-aa56-d1e405d020fd","content":"members of 10 community seedbanks from the southern region of Nepal came together at the Agyauli Community Seedbank in Nawalparasi to participate in a seed fair. A seed fair is an activity to create awareness about and appreciate local crop diversity, exchange seed and related knowledge, and celebrate farmers' efforts to conserve agrobiodiversity. It takes considerable time and effort to organize a seed fair. The Agyauli seed fair was divided in four parts graphically presented in this brief.Community seedbanks carefully select, label and display their crop varieties PART 1After the display of seeds has been organized, community seedbank members go around, interact with each other, identify and request seed of interest. Each community seedbank lists all the demands for seed on a form prepared by the organizers. This will allow the tracing of the seeds: by whom they will be used, how they will perform and if more seed will be produced."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1669816224.json b/main/part_2/1669816224.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..08d5de6b4f5eb29e4bef9cbbc411a234ea2ab80e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1669816224.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a1b252e7b2eddd197d24f5291437b23a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b3e629de-d3b9-4d72-ab95-9bb87184163e/retrieve","id":"53476641"},"keywords":["allometry","biomass","bunch","Cavendish","forecasting","regression","Musa spp.","moisture stress","East African Highland Banana"],"sieverID":"dbcfbc17-366e-4ee1-8681-0c97b06d91fb","content":"The largest abiotic constraint threatening banana (Musa spp.) production is water stress, impacting biomass buildup and yields; however, so far no studies have investigated the effects of water stress on allometric equations in banana. Weighted least square regression models were built for (i) estimating aboveground vegetative dry biomass (ABGVD) and corm dry biomass (cormD) and (ii) forecasting bunch fresh weight (bunchF), based on non-destructive parameters for two cultivars, Mchare Huti-Green Bell (HG, AA) and Cavendish Grande Naine (GN, AAA), under two irrigation regimes: full irrigation (FI) and rainfed (RF). FI affected growth, yield, and phenological parameters in the field (p < 0.05) depending on the onset of moisture stress. Pseudostem volume (Vpseudo) proved a good predictor for estimating ABGVD (R²adj = 0.88-0.92; RRMSE = 0.14-0.19), but suboptimal for cormD (R²adj = 0.90-0.89, RRMSE = 0.21-0.26 for HG; R²adj = 0.34-0.57, RRMSE = 0.38-0.43 for GN). Differences between RF and FI models (p < 0.05) were small as 95%CI overlapped. Vpseudo at flowering predicted bunchF in FI plots correctly (R²adj = 0.70 for HG, R²adj = 0.43 for GN; RRMSE = 0.12-0.15 for HG and GN). Differences between FI and RF models were pronounced as 95%CI did not overlap (p < 0.05). Bunch allometry was affected by irrigation, proving bunchF forecasting needs to include information on moisture stress during bunch filling or information on bunch parameters. Our allometric relationships can be used for rapid and non-destructive aboveground vegetative biomass (ABGVD) assessment over time and to forecast bunch potentials based on Vpseudo at flowering.Banana (Musa spp.), the most important fruit worldwide [1], is a long cycle crop with a vegetative phase between 7-13 months depending on environmental conditions, such as water and nutrients [2]. For most of the plant's life, it develops without a bunch. Bunch biomass is linked to biomass buildup during the vegetative phase (aboveground: pseudostem, petioles and leaves, and belowground: corm) [3], as assimilates are translocated from within the banana mat to the bunch after bunch emergence [2,4,5]. Monitoring vegetative biomass enables the following of growth over time and, due to its link with yields, can provide an indicator of future yields.Monitoring biomass over time can be done by destructive whole-plant sampling, but it is more practical to quantify the biomass during the growth cycle or to forecast the yield from non-destructive observations using allometric relationships. Destructive sampling is very labor intensive, time consuming, and provides only one sampling point for one plant. To capture biomass over time, plants need to be sampled periodically, requiring lots of plants and space. Sampling plants before they are harvest ready also stands in the way of quantifying bunch weights.Allometric relationships specify how growth and size in plants or plant components is related to their allocated biomass [6,7]. Parameters can be vegetative characteristics (e.g., pseudostem girth at base) [3,5,[8][9][10][11], bunch components (e.g., number of hands, fingers, finger volume) [12,13] or phenological observations (e.g., days to flowering, days to harvest). Vegetative parameters that are well connected to biomass, and/or parameters that are connected to future yields and allow bunch weight 'forecasting', are of significant interest. Measuring such parameters in the field is much faster than destructive sampling, and leaves fields intact. Allometric equations are useful for periodic biomass monitoring in the field [9] which is needed to calibrate and further improve computer crop simulation models [5,14,15]. Crop models can be used (among others) to analyze management interventions under different environments, to mitigate and adapt crop production to climate change [12,16,17] and for economic analysis to manage financial decisions (e.g., manpower and cost of agricultural inputs as irrigation) [15]. As allometric relationships are the foundation of such models, correct relationships are of crucial importance.Allometric relationships were previously developed for a limited number of banana cultivars for both vegetative and bunch biomass estimation. Nyombi et al. [5] developed allometric relationships for both biomass and bunch weight estimation for two East African highland banana (EAHB) cultivars (Mbwazirume and Kisansa) with data from two locations under various nutrient regimes. Their models followed a power function using girth and height of pseudostem as predictors, whereby covariates included banana phenological stages (vegetative, flowering, and harvest). Plants were irrigated, but with unspecified amounts of water, and fresh bunch weights ranged from 20-40 kg plant −1 , indicating stressed conditions. Pooling data across cultivars and growth stages lead to a high R² (>0.7) but increased the variance in biomass estimations. Model performance increased when data were partitioned between growth stages, indicating that allometric relationships vary with the growth stage. Yamaguchi and Araki [10] estimated biomass components using linear regression models based on pseudostem volume (Vpseudo) for EAHB cultivars from farmers' fields. Models had good fits (R² = 0.93) but the plant sample was small (n = 14) and stress could not be excluded as plants were rainfed. Negash et al. [8] estimated biomass based on pseudostem diameter and height in Enset (Ensete ventricosum), another genus of the Musaceae. Models performed well for total biomass estimation (R² > 0.89), but plants came from rainfed farmers' fields without information on potential stresses.Allometric models for bunch weight estimation were previously created, but these include parameters that change until harvest so cannot be used in forecasting bunch weights. Soares et al. [12] estimated bunch weights using multiple linear regression and neural networks for an AAAB tetraploid hybrid. Models were accurate (R² > 0.71), but predictors included variables that can only be measured in a destructive manner at harvest (e.g., average fruit weight at harvest). Woomer et al. [13] estimated bunch weights for a rainfed EAHB cv. Mbwazirume based on estimated bunch volume through linear regression (R² = 0.85-0.94), but as bunch volume changes until harvest [2], yields were not forecasted and no information on potential stress was given. Wairegi et al. [9] quantified bunch weights of 39 triploid EAHB cultivars from 179 farms in Uganda, whereby multiple linear regression models used pseudostem girth at base and height at 1 m, number of hands, and number of fingers in the lower row of the second hand as predictors. Data partitioning along cultivars, developmental stages, and regions improved model accuracy but differences were not significantly different compared to the pooled dataset. Plants were rainfed and given the wide range of bunch weights in this study (2-60 kg plant −1 ) stress from multiple sources was presumed, but its effect on allometry was not analyzed.The major constraint in all previously developed allometric models is that fields were not growing under optimal conditions as they were stressed by inadequate amounts of water and/or nutrients. Water (excess and deficit) is the most limiting abiotic constraint to banana production [18]. Suboptimal rainfall may lead to significant reduction in vegetative parameters (e.g., pseudostem height, girth), bunch components (number of hands, number of fingers, individual finger weight, fruit filling) [19], and may delay phenological events as flowering or harvest [20,21]. Parameters underlying allometric models are often impacted by moisture, but the overall effect on the relationship between a parameter and allocated biomass due to soil moisture is not specified in earlier allometric models. Their general use and applicability can be questioned. Similar genotypes may lead to different biomass allocation patterns and phenotypes under different biotic and abiotic environments [22], and banana has shown dry matter allocation plasticity due to drought and soil nutrients [23] and plant density [24]. Furthermore, due to the large phenotypic and or genetic differences between banana cultivars, allometric models can differ between cultivars [5,9].So far, no research has compared allometric models between differently irrigated plants in the same field. As allometric models relate growth and size, which are affected by soil moisture, to accumulated biomass, we are interested to check whether allometric relationships remain similar under different soil moisture regimes.The objective of this research was three-fold: Firstly, to assess the effect of soil moisture on growth parameters, phenology and growth rates using two distinctly different cultivars: the EAHB cv. Mchare-Huti Green Bell (AA), a diploid, and the Cavendish-Grande Naine (AAA), a triploid of immense commercial appeal.Secondly, to use easily observable plant growth parameters to establish allometric relationships in both cultivars for (i) vegetative biomass estimation (aboveground: pseudostem, petioles, and leaves and belowground: corm) to allow monitoring vegetative biomass production over time, and (ii) bunch weight forecasting to allow quantifying bunch weights before harvest.Thirdly, to compare these allometric relationships across water regimes for both cultivars to assess whether banana plasticity under drought results in significant different relationships. As drought readily affects vegetative parameters, yield, and phenology [2,18,22], we hypothesize drought to significantly influence allometric relationships of both vegetative biomass estimation and bunch weight forecasting.Experiments were established in fields of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST) in Arusha, Tanzania (3°23′58″ S, 36°47′48″ E) at an altitude of 1188 m asl as described in detail in Stevens et al. [25]. Soils are Endocalcic Phaeozems (Geoabruptic, Clayic, Humic) [26], moderately shallow to deep (90-120 cm) with a silty clay loam to silty clay texture. The climate is a tropical highland climate with a moderately cool thermal zone. Rainfall follows a bimodal yearly pattern with a long rainy season extending from late March to early June and a shorter rainy season from October to December, although rainfall is variable from year to year [25,27].Total precipitation received during the experiment was about 903 mm year −1 for HG, and 913 mm year −1 for GN, lower than those for optimal banana production (1100-2650 mm year −1 ) and not evenly spread (dry spells of more than two months) (Figure 1a) implying the need for irrigation [19,28,29]. Two experiments were carried out differing in cultivar and date of planting over the course of two full crop cycles (until harvest of C2). Planting material was provided by IITA, Arusha, Tanzania and Crop Bioscience Solutions Ltd, Arusha, Tanzania. In experiment 1, the EAHB Huti Green Bell (HG, Musa AA Mchare subgroup) was planted on 3 May 2017. In experiment 2, Grande Naine (GN, Musa AAA Cavendish subgroup) was planted on 17 November 2017. The diploid HG is characterized by a slender tall pseudostem, with erect foliage and a bunch that bears fruits with marked ridges [30]. The triploid GN is characterized by a short, thick pseudostem, with semi-drooping foliage and producing almost round fingers [31]. Both cultivars are of significantly different phenotypical constitution. Planting material for both experiments consisted of in vitro plants, hardened in growth chambers and screen houses. Plant spacing was 2 m (row) × 3 m (line) leading to 1666 plants ha −1 .The design was a blocked design with drip irrigation as treatment but given the infrastructure the irrigation treatments could not be randomized (Figure S1). In experiment 1, two blocks were planted with HG. Each block contained five rows of 15 mats, subdivided in three plots of 25 mats (5 × 5), of which the central nine mats (3 × 3) were used for continuous data collection. Each block consisted of a different irrigation treatment. For HG, there were three plots for each treatment. Border mats were used for periodic destructive sampling. In experiment 2, four blocks were planted with GN. Each block contained five rows of 14 mats, subdivided in two plots of 35 mats (7 × 5), receiving two different irrigation treatments. The central nine mats (3 × 3) in each plot were used for continuous growth data collection, leading to four replications (plots) per treatment. The first and last two mats of each row (2 × 5 mats) together with the border rows were used for periodic destructive sampling. Each treatment was replicated four times across the blocks.All mats received irrigation for the first four months post-transplant (establishment period, four MAP). Thereafter, two irrigation treatments were applied: optimal 'full' irrigation (FI) and rainfed (RF), based on volumetric water contents in the root zone (as determined by Time Domain Reflectometry) (Figure 1b). In the FI treatment, mats received water whenever more than 25% of total available water in the root zone was depleted. No supplemental irrigation was provided in RF treatments after the initial four month establishment period, leading to divergence of soil moisture between RF and FI in HG and GN closely following the dry seasons (Figure 1a,b). In HG, soil moisture first became significantly different at 23 weeks after planting (WAP) (October 2017) until 45 WAP (March 2018) during the vegetative stage of C1, followed by a rainy season after which they diverged again from 55 WAP (May 2018). In GN, RF plots became significantly more depleted from 27 WAP onwards (May 2018), close to the onset of flower emergence of C1 [25], therefore in GN most of the vegetative growth of C1 occurred under similar soil moisture in RF and FI plots.Irrigation and precipitation combined, FI plots received approx. 3100 mm (HG) and 4003 mm (GN) over the entire growing season (until harvest of C2), compared to RF plots which received 1916 mm (HG) and 2549 mm (GN). FI plots received approx. 1522 mm year −1 (HG) and 2000 mm year −1 (GN). RF plots received approx. 935 mm year −1 (HG) and 1297 mm year −1 (GN). For a more detailed explanation on the onset of moisture stress and its effect on leaf formation and canopy cover in these fields, the reader is referred to Stevens et al. [25].Mats received an optimal mixture of mineral fertilizers and manure, to exclude nutrient stresses [32]. Mineral fertilizers were split applied: 153 kg N ha −1 year −1 (urea), 206 kg K ha −1 year −1 (Muriate of potash), 19.26 kg Mg ha −1 year −1 , and 25.6 kg S ha −1 year −1 (MgSO4) were applied monthly in the rainy season and every two months in the dry season, while 40.2 kg P ha −1 year −1 (triple super phosphate) was applied every five months. Twenty L of fresh farmyard cow manure was applied per mat twice yearly before the start of the rainy season.All suckers were allowed to grow until four MAP after which suckers were selected for C2 (Figure S2). Afterwards, suckers were pruned on a monthly basis until bunch filling of C1, when a sucker for C3 was chosen. Maximally, three generations were allowed to grow at any time. Weeds and dead leaves were cut monthly and removed from the field. No pests were present in the field.No disease control was applied, except for Black Sigatoka (Pseudocercospora fijiensis) in the wet season, when moderately infected leaves were pruned to avoid further spread of this fungus [25].Growth data included periodic non-destructive growth data and destructive data (Table 1). Non-destructive growth data were measured monthly at the plot level (3 × 3 mats), on all individual plant cycles (cycle 1, C1; cycle 2, C2 and cycle 3, C3) present on the mat until harvest of C2 (Table 1). The main plant is the oldest plant on a mat, whereby ratoon plants (sucker) are new selected shoots springing from the base of the plant. To address multicollinearity, measured parameters were recombined into new parameters as pseudostem volume (Vpseudo), leaf area index (LAI), Vfinger, and Ratiofinger (Table 1).Leaf areas were estimated by measuring leaf length, leaf width, and using an experimentally determined leaf area factor (laf) as explained by Stevens et al. [30]. LAI was determined by summing the area of all the leaves on a banana plant and dividing it by the ground area for each mat.Phenological events as days to flowering (DTF) and days to harvest (DTH) were noted for each plant on a mat. As C3 has not fully flowered and harvested, phenological events were only presented for C1 and C2 (Table 2). For C1, the DTF and DTH were determined from planting. For C2, the DTF and DTH were determined from the moment of sucker selection until flowering and harvest. Flower cycle duration (FCD) notes the duration in days between flower emergence of C1 and C2 (successive cycles) on the same mat, and harvest cycle duration (HCD) notes the duration in days between successive harvest of C1 and C2 on the same mat.The pseudostem volume at flower emergence (Vpseudo, Flower) and the LAI at flower emergence (LAIFlower) were interpolated for flowering dates through local non-parametric regression (loess) on the Vpseudo and LAI data collected over the growing season (Figure S3). Similarly, the Vpseudo and LAI of the follower (S for sucker) of the flowering main plant was determined (Vpseudo, FlowerS and LAIFlower,S).Biomass component weights (pseudostem, leaf, petiole, bunch, and corm) were measured destructively during 'harvest' and 'periodic destructive sampling'.At 'harvest', harvest-ready plants of C1 and C2 showing ripe bunches were cut down at the base of the pseudostem, but succeeding cycles were left on the mat. Non-destructive vegetative and bunch characteristics (Table 1) were determined on the harvested plant together with destructive biomass. Fresh weight of vegetative components (pseudostem, leaf, petioles) and bunch (bunchF) was measured using a field balance (±0.05kg), and subsamples were taken, chopped and dried at 80 °C for 48 h in a hot-air oven (to not destroy plant tissue) until subsample weights did not vary anymore to determine the dry matter percentage (Table S1). Aboveground vegetative dry matter (ABGVD) included the pseudostem, petioles, and leaves. Hereafter, when using the term 'harvest', plants that are harvest ready for their bunches were noted.At 'periodic destructive sampling', entire mats were randomly sampled every three months from planting onwards to obtain a database of plants spanning different sizes and growth stages including C1, C2, and C3 plants. From planting onwards, every three months, mats (n = 3) were randomly chosen from border rows or from destructive sampling areas in each treatment in both experiments. Whole mats were excavated and for each individual cycle, growth data were measured (Table 1) and biomass components (corm, pseudostem, petioles, leaves, bunch) were separated and weighted. Non-differentiated suckers (not protruding above ground level) were counted as part of the corm. All cycles present on a mat (C1, C2, and C3) were used for data collection. ABGVD was calculated similarly as at harvest. Corms were separated per cycle, weighted and corm dry matter (cormD) was calculated based on fresh corm weight and subsample dry matter percentages (Table S1). ABGVD, aboveground vegetative dry matter includes pseudostem, petiole and leaf dry matter. BunchF, fresh bunch weight; Nhand, number of hands on a bunch; Nfinger, number of fingers on a bunch. Phenology data: DTF, days to flower emergence; DTH, days to harvest; Moisture (precipitation and irrigation) and ET0 Ratios: between planting and flowering (RPF), flowering and harvest (RFH) and planting and harvest (RPH); Cycle duration: FCD, flower cycle duration, the time (in days) between flower emergence of C1 and flower emergence of C2 (on matlevel), HCD is the duration (in days) between harvest of C1 and harvest of C2 (on matlevel). Treatments: full irrigation (FI), rainfed (RF). Cultivars: Huti Green Bell (HG), Grande Naine (GN). † flowering, ‡ harvest. T: notes difference between treatment FI and RF (within a cycle and cultivar) (p= 0.05), C: notes difference between cycles (within a moisture treatment and cultivar) (p = 0.05).Kruskall-Wallis non-parametric tests (α = 0.05) for multiple comparison of growth parameters between irrigation treatments, cultivar, and growth cycle were applied on collected growth data at flowering and harvest of C1 and C2 (Table 2).As the effect of added water (precipitation and irrigation) is very dependent on the environment in which a plant develops the ratio (R) of cumulative water added (W) and cumulative ET0 was determined for each plant between: planting and flowering (RPF), flowering and harvest (RFH), and planting and harvest (RPH) (Table 2).The average pseudostem growth rate (Vrate, Table 1), an indicator of vegetative growth was analyzed in terms of RPF, an indicator of moisture between planting and flowering. Linear models were created with Vrate as a dependent variable and RPF as the independent variable for each cultivar and cycle (Table 3). The average bunch growth rate (Brate, Table 1) of plants in the field was analyzed in terms of Vrate (the earlier vegetative growth rate) and RFH, an indicator of moisture between flowering and harvest. Linear models were created with Brate as a dependent variable and Vrate and RFH as the independent variable for each cultivar and cycle. Effects of the parameters were significant if coefficients in the linear models were significant (Table 3). Two types of allometric relationships were created corresponding to the different objectives: (i) models for estimating vegetative biomass (ABGVD and cormD), and (ii) models for forecasting fresh bunch weights (bunchF) from flowering onwards. Since allometry specifies how growth and size in plants or plant components is related to their allocated biomass, only parameters measured on a plant were put into the allometric equations.Plants sampled during harvest and periodic destructive sampling were used for ABGVD allometry. Data spanned multiple cycles C1, C2, and C3 with plants of different sizes. Vegetative parameters at the moment of destructive sampling (Vpseudo, LAI) and bunch parameters (Nfinger, Nhand, Vfinger, Ratiofinger) for plants sampled when bearing bunches were used for regression (Tables 1 and 4).Plants sampled during periodic destructive sampling were used for cormD allometry. CormD was regressed on vegetative parameters at the moment of sampling (Vpseudo, LAI), but given the lack of replications of bunch bearing plants at destructive sampling, other parameters were not included (Table 4).Plants with bunches ready for harvest (sampled at harvest) were used for bunchF regression. Only C1 and C2 were used, as C3 was not yet ready for harvest. As early estimation is of interest, the bunchF was regressed sequentially on predictors that can be grouped according to the period when first measurement is possible. Predictors were organized in three groups: Early predictors, relating to parameters at flowering: days to flowering (DTF), Vpseudo,Flower, LAIFlower; Middle predictors, describing bunch characteristics that do not change during fruit filling: Nhand and Nfinger; and late predictors, describing bunch parameters that change up until the moment of harvest: Ratiofinger and Vfinger (Table 4). In addition to parameters measured on the main plant, the size of the sucker at flowering of the main plant (Vpseudo,flowerS) on the same mat was also used as a predictor in regressions (Table 4).Observations used in regression analysis were subjected to a principal component analysis to identify multivariate outliers. Scatterplots in the first four PCs were made, and observations where PCA scores lay outside the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) ellipse for treatment × cultivar group were removed.First, multiple linear regression models were created for FI plants to determine the best model form for each cultivar (Table 4). Estimation of biomass and yield, as a rule rather than an exception, is heteroscedastic. As transforming variables leads to non-intuitive relations, heteroscedasticity was dealt with through weighted least squares regression (WLS) [7]. After WLS regression, residual plots were checked to confirm whether WLS models became homoscedastic. The regression models were compared to assess the most suitable linear regression form. Criteria used in model selection were the adjusted correlation coefficient (R²adj), relative root mean square error (RRMSE), and the Akaike information criterion (AIC). AIC can only be compared on models with similar number of observations. Whenever multiple predictors needed to be retained in the model, variance inflation factors (VIF) were checked as correlated predictors might lead to collinearity. Model performance was classified on RRMSE values as excellent (≤10%), good (10% < RRMSE≤ 20%), fair (20% < RRMSE≤ 30%), and poor (>30%) [34]. Next to goodness of fit criteria, the practicality of predictors in the field was also considered in choosing the final model form.After determining the best model forms for FI plants, pooled (combining data from cultivars and treatments) and specific regression models (separating data across cultivars and treatments) were created (Table 5). Specific regression models were compared between irrigation treatments and cultivars. Comparison of specific regression models were done using three methods. In the first method, the 95%CI for parameter coefficients in the regressions were compared across groups to evaluate overlap. If 95%CI overlapped, models were not different. The second method used an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) by adding categorical variables treatment and cultivar as dummy variables in the linear regression models. It was assessed whether the parameter coefficients in the models were significantly different between the groups, or whether they could be estimated by a common coefficient [7]. The third method used FI models for predicting both FI and RF data. These predicted values (xi) were plotted against observed values (yi), whereby the regression line was evaluated for bias. The bias% for each group (treatment x cultivar) was calculated aswith xi and yi being the observed and predicted values for the i th observation and n is the number of observations [9]. If the bias% is positive, the models underestimate reality and if the bias% is negative, models overestimate reality. The onset of soil moisture differences differed between experiments (Figure 1b), due to differences in planting time (Figure 1c) resulting in rainfall periods affecting plants at a different growth stages (Figure 1a-c). In HG, moisture differences became significant during the vegetative stage of C1 onwards, whilst for GN, moisture differences occurred from the approximate onset of flower emergence in C1 (Figure 1b,c) [25]. This is reflected in the ratio between water and ET0 between planting and flowering (RPF) (Table 2). RPF differed significantly between treatments in both cycles and cultivars (p < 0.05). RPF during HG C1 differed between treatments, but remained suboptimal for both FI (0.743 ± 0.03) and RF (0.638 ± 0.0404), indicating stressed vegetative growth. RPF during GN C1 was optimal in both FI (1.44 ±0.0213) and RF (1.26 ± 0.0448), indicating non stressed vegetative growth until flowering.During bunch development, RFH differed significantly between treatments in all cycles and cultivars (p < 0.05). RFH was always optimal or close to 1 in FI, but not in RF except in HG-C1 where RF plants developed bunches during the rainy season (RFH = 1.47 ± 0.182). Contrastingly, GN C1 plants developed bunches during the dry season as shown by RFH of 0.329 (±0.0239) for RF C1.Under increased soil moisture stress, a delay in banana phenology occurred, but severity of delay differed between cultivars and cycles. In HG, flowering differences were small (4 days) in C1, and not significant in C2. In GN, differences in DTF were more pronounced. RF plants flowered on average 6 days earlier in C1. In contrast, FI plants flowered on average 40 days earlier in C2 (p < 0.05).Differences in harvest date (DTH) were more pronounced. In HG, FI plants were harvested 37 and 76 days earlier in C1 and C2, respectively. In GN, there was no difference in C1 (p > 0.05) but harvest occurred 34 days earlier in C2 FI plants (p < 0.05) (Table 2).Vegetative growth was affected significantly by irrigation (Table 2). FI increased parameters H, Gbase, and Vpseudo significantly, except for GN C1 (p = 0.24 for H, p = 0.55 for Gbase) as these developed under RPF > 1 until flowering of C1 (Table 2). Correspondingly, FI increased vegetative biomass ABGVD at harvest (p < 0.05) (Table 2).Bunch growth was also significantly affected by irrigation (Table 2). BunchF differences under irrigation were reflected in measured bunch parameters (Table 2). In HG, Nhand was increased in FI in C1 (p = 2.7 × 10 −4 ), but similar in C2 (p = 0.83). Nfinger increased in both cycles, and fingers were also bigger (Vfinger) under irrigation (p < 0.05). This resulted in significant increased bunchF under irrigation in C1 and C2 (p < 0.05).In GN, Nhand was similar in both cycles between FI and RF (Table 2), but Nfinger increased under FI in C2 (p = 4.4 × 10 −4 ) (Table 2). Large differences were obtained during bunch filling, as FingerF and Vfinger increased under FI in both cycles (p < 0.05). Differences between RF and FI occurred due to differential soil moisture during bunch filling (RFH = 0.333 in RF C1) from C1 onwards (Figure 1a).Combining phenology and growth parameters shows growth speeds (Vrate and Brate) of plants differed significantly between the treatments (Figure 2 and Table 3). Moisture (RPF) had a significant effect on growth rates of the pseudostem (Vrate), except in GN-C1 as these plants all developed under optimal conditions (RPF>1). In all other groups, RPF had a significant (p < 0.05) positive effect on Vrate in HG and GN. Both Vrate and moisture after flowering (RFH) had a significant effect on bunch growth rates (Brate) (Figure 2 and Table 5).Generally, an increase in Vrate led to an increase in Brate, except for HG-C2. Vrate on its own does not fully explain the bunch growth rate (Table 5) as coefficients for RFH are significant in several models. This is shown clearly in GN-C1, as Vrate in FI plants is smaller, but bunch growth rates are significantly larger (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Inclusion of RFH proves necessary for correctly assessing Brate. Vpseudo was linearly related to ABGVD in both HG and GN (Figure 3), and to all its components (leafD, petioleD, and pseudostemD) (Figure S6). VIFs higher than 5 (indicating collinearity) were not found in our models (Table 4). Regression models were specific models for treatment and cultivar as shown in Table 5; (b) Comparison of actual ABGVD (kg plant -1 ) with estimated ABGVD (kg plant -1 ) as obtained using the specific regression models for treatment and cultivar as shown in Table 5. FI notes full irrigation, RF notes rainfed. Models using only Vpseudo as a predictor already had a good model fit in HG and GN (RRMSE = 0.14) (Table 4). Lm.1 was the best model in terms of goodness of fit, and practicality, and was used for creating pooled and specific regression models (Table 5).Specific FI and RF models for ABGVD showed overlapping 95%CI model coefficients for intercept and slope in both HG and GN (Table 5), but coefficients were different between treatments using the ANCOVA method. For HG, the intercept was reduced in the RF model by 0.32 (p = 8.25 × 10 −14 ), and the slope was very slightly reduced by 5 × 10 −3 (p = 0.014). For GN, there was no effect on the intercept (p = 0.13) and the slope was reduced by 6.07 × 10 −03 (p = 4.46 × 10 −3 ) in RF (Figure 3 and Table 5).Comparing predictions of the FI models with RF models, led to bias% of −92.1% (HG) and −81.9% (GN) for FI plants and bias% of −44.6% (HG) and −41.4.0% (GN) for RF plants. Both FI and RF plants were overestimated. Small plants (<25L) were overestimated in small absolute terms (<1 kg DM plant −1 ), but as bias% calculates the relative deviation, these had a large effect on the overall bias%. Recalculating bias% after removal of the smaller plant (<25L) led to bias% of 2.07% (HG) and −1.48 (GN) in FI, and bias% of −7.26% (HG) and −10.1% (GN) in RF. Plants <25L were overestimated in both FI and RF (in small absolute terms), but plants >25L were only overestimated in RF.Comparison of cultivar FI models showed 95%CI model coefficients overlapped for intercept and slope (Table 5) but models were distinctly different in intercept (p = 0.01) and slope (p = 8.89 × 10 −4 ) following ANCOVA.As 95%CI for coefficients overlapped between treatments and cultivars, the differences although significant, may be small in practice. Pooling data from both cultivars and treatments (n = 700) and performing the regression on this pooled data led to a good model fit (R²adj = 0.90, RRMSE = 0.18), using Vpseudo as predictor (Table 5).The model for estimating ABGVD in HG and GN becomes: = 0.33 + 6.02 × 10 × ; HG and GN combined (2) with ABGVD, aboveground vegetative dry matter (kg DM plant −1 ) and Vpseudo, pseudostem volume (L).Vpseudo was linearly related to cormD in both HG and GN (Figure 4). VIFs higher than 5 were not found in the cormD models. 5; (b) Comparison of actual cormD vs. estimated cormD as obtained using the specific regression models for treatment and cultivar as shown in Table 5. FI notes full irrigation, RF notes rainfed.Models with only Vpseudo and LAI as predictors for cormD led to a fair model performance for HG (RRMSE = 0.22) but poor model performance for GN (RRMSE = 0.34) (Table 4). Lm.1 was the best model in terms of goodness of fit and used for creating pooled and specific regression models (Table 5).Specific FI and RF models revealed 95%CI of coefficients overlapped for both HG and GN (Table 4), but coefficients were significantly different between treatments in both HG and GN using the ANCOVA method. For HG, RF reduced the slope by 4.01 × 10 −3 (p = 5.18 × 10 −3 ), had no effect on the intercept (p = 0.09) (Figure 4, Table 5). For GN, RF reduced the intercept by 0.01 (p = 2.22 × 10 −5 ) and the slope by 5.22 × 10 −3 (p = 7.59 × 10 −4 ) (Figure 3). Due to overlap of 95% CI, differences were not so pronounced.All models for cormD (Tables 4 and 5) were suboptimal given the fair to poor RRMSE values, and the large variation around the 1/1 line (Figure 4). Therefore, specific model differences may not be correct, and care should be taken.Using the specific FI regression models led to a bias% of −54.5% (HG) and −156% (GN) for FI plants, and bias% of −13.2% (HG) and −73.2% (GN) for RF plants. Models overestimated the cormD in both treatments and cultivars. Overestimation occurred again through the influence of smaller plants. Recounting bias% after removal of smaller plants led to a bias% of −3.78% (HG) and −11.0% (GN) for FI compared to −23.6% (HG) and −39.2% (GN) for RF. Thereby, the RF plants were overestimated more strongly compared to the FI plants. In general, models overestimated small plants (<25 L), whereas bigger plants show no overestimation in HG FI, show a slight overestimation in GN FI plants, and show a large overestimation in RF plants of both cultivars.Cultivar FI models were also different as 95%CI coefficients did not overlap, and following ANCOVA, HG model intercepts were reduced (p = 1.77 10 −4 ) and slopes increased (p = 0.05) compared to GN. The best models for estimating cormD for HG and GN became = 0.13 + 2.24 × 10 × ;(3) = 0.62 + 1.08 × 10 × ;with cormD, corm dry matter (kg DM plant −1 ), and Vpseudo, the pseudostem volume (L).ABGVD was significantly positively correlated to bunchF (p < 0.05) with R²adj of 0.73 (FI) and 0.65 (RF) for HG, and R²adj of 0.61 (FI) and 0.54 (RF) for GN. Similarly, Vpseudo, Flower was linearly related to bunchF at harvest (Figure 5). VIFs higher than 5 were not identified in the bunch models. ) with estimated bunchF (kg plant -1 ) as obtained using the specific regression models for treatment and cultivar as shown in Table 4. FI notes full irrigation, RF notes rainfed.Models containing only early bunch data (lm.1 to lm.7) had RRMSE values ranging from 0.12 to 0.25 (HG) and 0.13 to 0.2 (GN) indicating good model fit (Table 4). Inclusion of data on sucker size (Vpseudo,flowerS) did not improve the RRMSE of the models (lm. 6 to lm.7) compared to models with only Vpseudo,flower (lm.1). Inclusion of data collected at later stages (lm.8 to lm.11) improved model fits as RRMSE values reduced and R²adj increased. To allow for earliest bunch estimation, model containing Vpseudo, Flower (lm.1) were retained for both HG (R²adj = 0.70, RRMSE = 0.12) and GN (R²adj = 0.43, RRMSE = 0.15).Pooled and specific regression models proved different between treatments in both HG and GN (p < 0.01) (Table 5). Model coefficients did not show overlap in the 95%CI. For HG, RF led to a significantly lower intercept (ANCOVA, p = 7.18 × 10 −12 ), whilst slopes remained similar (ANCOVA, p = 0.38). For GN, the intercept and slope were different between treatments (p < 0.05) leading to widely different relationships with Vpseudo, Flower (Figure 4, Table 4).Using the specific FI regression models to estimate bunchF for both FI and RF plants, led to a significant overestimation of RF bunches in both HG and GN (Figure 5). The bias% for FI plants was −2.31% (HG) and −1.74% (GN) and the bias% of the RF plants was −28.0% (HG) and −24.1% (GN). Therefore, using FI models significantly overestimated the RF plants.The specific models were also different between the cultivars (p < 0.01, Figure 5 and Table 5). Models for optimal bunch weights (FI conditions) became: ℎ = 0.13 + 2.24 × 10 × , ;-FI (5) ℎ = 0.62 + 1.08 × 10 × , ;-FI (6) with bunchF being fresh bunch weight (kg plant −1 ), and Vpseudo,flower being the pseudostem volume (L) at flowering.Irrigation resulted in significant soil moisture differences (Figure 1b) affecting phenology, vegetative growth, and bunch growth (Table 2). Drought in banana induces stomatal closure, reducing transpiration and photosynthesis which reduces leaf area, leaf emission rate, and vegetative growth in general [18,25,[35][36][37]. Drought during flower initiation may reduce Nhand per bunch and Nfinger per hand [28], whereas drought after flower initiation results in suboptimal fruit filling [38].HG plants already experienced different moisture regimes during C1 vegetative growth and thereby differed between FI and RF in both vegetative and bunch parameters (Table 2). GN plants developed under optimal conditions (RPF > 1) until flower emergence of C1 [25], thereby FI and RF plants of C1 did not differ in Vpseudo, Nhand, and Nfinger (Table 2), parameters that are determined during the vegetative stage. Differences in RFH from C1 flowering onward (Figure 1b and Table 2) led to differences in ABGVD, fingerF, Vfinger, Ratiofinger, and bunchF at harvest.Phenology was delayed under drought depending on the severity of moisture deficit. Differences in flowering (DTF) remained small, but differences in harvest (DTH) were very pronounced with FI plants being harvested much earlier in both cycles and cultivars (Table 2). Flowering of GN C1 occurred 6 days earlier in RF plants, but RPF of both treatments was bigger than 1, so RF plants developed optimally until flowering. After flower emergence, RFH ratios in RF plants were significantly lower than 1 (0.329 ± 0.0239) delaying harvest. Differences in DTF and DTH increased in C2, as plants of C2 developed under more significant moisture stress for GN (Table 2). Environmental stress due to suboptimal soil moisture has been shown to delay floral development and increase bunch filling duration in banana plants [18,39,40].Combining absolute growth and phenology, showed effects of moisture on pseudostem (Vrate) and bunch (Brate) growth rates (Table 3, Figure 2). Vrate was influenced by RPF (p < 0.05, Table 3), although effects differ due to the size of RPF. If RPF > 1, moisture covers the evaporative demand as shown in GN-C1, where Vrate was not influenced by RPF as RPF was optimal for both RF and FI (Table 3). Only when RPF was less than 1, Vrate seemed to be negatively affected (Figure 2 and Table 3). In order to achieve fast vegetative growth rates, RPF should remain above 1.The effect of Vrate on Brate was significant (Table 3), as faster Vrate resulted in increased Brate (Figure 2b). Moisture after flowering (RFH) also influences Brate significantly (Table 3, Figure 2c). RFH needs to be bigger or close to 1 to ensure optimal bunch filling (Figure 2 and Table 3). Within cycles and cultivars, we see that an increased RFH has the bigger Brate for GN and HG (except HG C2).Moisture deficit thereby has a double effect on bunch growth. Firstly, moisture deficits during the vegetative stage (RPF < 1) reduce the vegetative growth of the plant (Vrate), which reduces the Brate. During bunch filling, previously stored nutrients are translocated to fill the bunch [2][3][4][5]. Less vegetative biomass thereby indicates less translocation potential. Secondly, moisture deficits during the bunch filling stage (RFH < 1) affect translocation and bunch filling [18,39], resulting in a reduced Brate. Both stages are important in the eventual outcome of the bunch weight. In order to achieve optimal growth for the pseudostem and the bunch, added moisture amounts should be compared to evaporative demands of the atmosphere. If the added moisture amounts are significantly less than the reference evapotranspiration (R < 1), moisture needs to be added to ensure optimal growth.Vpseudo was significantly linearly correlated to the ABGVD (Figure 3), and a good predictor for ABGVD in both HG and GN (RRMSE of 0.14) (Table 4). Height, girth, and diameters (components for volume estimation) are often used in biomass regression [7]. In trees, height and diameter at breast height are significantly correlated to biomass of a stand [7,41,42]. Negash et al. [8] found girth at base to be the best predictor for aboveground biomass estimation (R² = 0.77-0.98) in Enset. Nyombi et al. [5] found girth at base to be the best predictor in development-stage specific regressions (R² = 0.79-0.99), but height to be the best predictor of ABGVD when pooling the data across development stages (R² = 0.98). Combining height and girth leads to a parameter describing the pseudostem (volume) in three dimensions, without leading to high co-linearity when keeping both parameters in the model [7]. Vpseudo is linked to all components of aboveground biomass (pseudostem, leaves, and petioles) in our field (Figure S6). The pseudostem is composed of tightly compacted leaf sheaths, which result from previous cumulative leaf formation. Vpseudo was therefore also correlated to the petiole and leaf mass in our field (Figure S6) [39]. However, the number of leaves and petioles at a given time are also affected by management practices (e.g., pruning) and stress conditions, indicating correlations can differ in other plantations.Even though Vpseudo was affected by soil moisture deficit, the relationship between Vpseudo and ABGVD was not influenced strongly. Specific regression models for ABGVD between treatment and cultivar differed according to ANCOVA (p < 0.05) (Table 4), but differences were small as 95%CI for model coefficients overlapped. Pooling cultivar and treatment data led to a good model fit (R²adj 0.90 and RRMSE 0.18, Table 5) indicating a single ABGVD model based on Vpseudo can be used (Equation ( 2)).Perhaps stress was not marked enough for ABGVD plasticity under drought as average bunches in RF plots ranged from 19.6 to 24.4 kg plant −1 in HG, and from 33.2 to 33.3 kg plant −1 for GN, which are considered good yields. Nyombi et al. [5] had irrigated yields for EAHB cv. Mbwazirume ranging from 20 to 40 kg plant −1 , whilst Wairegi et al. [9] showed yields for different rainfed EAHB cultivars from on farm visits ranging from 2-60 kg plant −1 . Our yields are therefore higher compared to their lower range, hence less stress was present.Models did overestimate small plants (<25L). This overestimation might be a characteristic of the model, as the intercept was not forced through zero during modelling as this may lead to poorer goodness of fit characteristics [43]. At Vpseudo zero, there is an overestimation of 0.54 kg DM plant −1 (HG) and 0.22 kg DM plant −1 (GN), which are small absolute DM values, but with a large influence on the total bias%. Removing smaller plants reduced bias%. Overestimation of small plants could also be due to the growing behavior of suckers. Small suckers have scale and lanceolate leaves but produce foliage leaves at approx. 1.5 m height [2,44]. Shading results in improved partitioning to aboveground structures [45] and leads to an increase in pseudostem growth to faster reach sunlight. Therefore, small plants might have a lower pseudostem density (kg DM volume −1 ), leading to an overestimation when presuming their density to be similar to bigger plants. Another possibility is that all smaller plants are in the vegetative stage. Nyombi et al. [5] found that vegetative aboveground biomass models differ according to plant growth stage (vegetative, flowering, or harvest). Plants in the vegetative stage had a lower ABGVD compared to plants at flowering and harvest with similar girths and heights. Pooling the data across these plant growth stages might have led to this overestimation caused by small plants, but the overestimation is small in absolute terms (<1 kg DM plant −1 ), still warranting the use of a general regression model as this is more practical. The general regression model to use for ABGVD estimation to be used is given in Equation (2).Vpseudo was linearly correlated to the belowground cormD (Figure 4). CormD models based on Vpseudo ranged from fair in HG (RRMSE = 0.24) to poor in GN (RRMSE = 0.33) (Table 4), making Vpseudo less suitable for cormD estimation. Nyombi et al. [5] found good exponential relationships between pseudostem girth at base and cormD (R² = 0.59-0.98) but cormD in their field ranged between 0-0.40 kg plant −1 , which seems low compared to our cormD values ranging from 0.09-4.27 kg plant −1 . Negash et al. [8] found good correlations between belowground biomass (corm and adventitious roots) and diameter at base for Enset (R² = 0.75), but found no such correlation with height (R² = 0.23-0.27). Creating power models with radius at base instead of Vpseudo did not improve model fits for cormD in both HG (RRMSE = 0.38) and GN (RRMSE = 0.41) (data not shown).Using aboveground characteristics to describe a belowground structure has shortcomings. Parameters relating to corm dimensions (e.g., corm height and girth) are expected to considerably improve the cormD estimation, but in order to estimate these the corm needs to be excavated. Corm dimensions also vary in diameter and height with plant growth phase (vegetative, flowering, harvest) and whether the plant is in the first or second cycle [2]. The corm is a storage organ whose reserves are used for fruit growth and sucker development, whereby bunch development stage, size and the amount of produced suckers also play a role in corm biomass [2]. In our field, the variation of cormD with Vpseudo increased with cycle, thereby partitioning models in terms of cycle or plant growth phase (vegetative, flowering, harvest) might significantly improve the model. Nyombi et al. [5] found growth stage specific allometric relationships for cormD, whereby R² reduced from the vegetative (0.98) to the harvest phase (0.57), signifying increased variation with increasing growth stage.The comparison of specific models across treatments revealed irrigation effects to be significant (ANCOVA, p < 0.05), but as 95%CI intervals overlap between specific treatment models, differences were not very pronounced (Table 4). Pooled data per cultivar did not increase RRMSE much, leading to the conclusion that cormD models are similar among RF and FI. It seems that at a given Vpseudo, cormD will be higher in FI than in RF plants, but given the suboptimal nature of models based on Vpseudo we cannot be certain of the water stress effects on corm allometry. The biomass of the underground corm structure is too variable to accurately predict based on aboveground vegetative characteristics alone, and care must be taken using these relationships.Vegetative growth (Vrate) was linked to bunch growth in our field (Brate) (Figure 2 and Table 3). Others have also shown pseudostem size significantly correlates with bunch weights: R² = 0.63-0.85 [4], R² = 0.66 [9], R² = 0.57-0.7 [5], R² = 0.97-0.98 [10]. The pseudostem size relates to bunch filling potential as assimilates are translocated during the bunch filling stage [2,4,5,46] even across ratoon plants [47]. High yields are linked to vigorous early plant growth in plantain [3].As such, stepwise regression revealed Vpseudo, Flower to be the most important predictor of bunchF compared to other regression models (R²adj of 0.7 for HG and 0.43 for GN; RRMSE of 0.12 for HG and 0.15 for GN) (Table 4). Inclusion of bunch related predictors (Nfinger, Nhand, Vfinger) improved model fits as R²adj increased (0.81 for HG and 0.78 for GN) and RRMSE decreased (0.1 for both HG and GN lm.11) (Table 5). The more parameters were included closer to bunch harvest, the better the prediction. Practically, using Vpseudo,flower as a predictor for bunchF already led to good model performance in both HG and GN FI models (RRMSE 0.13-0.14).Bunch models based on Vpseudo,flower were very different between FI and RF, as 95%CI did not overlap and following ANCOVA(p < 0.05). FI models performed better (RRMSE 0.13 for HG, 0.14 for GN) than RF models (RRMSE 0.15 for HG, 0.23 for GN).These different relationships between bunchF and Vpseudo,flower under drought follow differences in bunch characteristics under RF vs. FI conditions (Table 2). Drought during flower initiation may reduce Nhand and Nfinger whereas drought during bunch filling results in suboptimal fruit filling (Vfinger) [2,18,38]. Moisture regimes at and after flowering are thereby crucial in determining actual bunch weights in the field, but these are not reflected in Vpseudo, Flower. Up until flower emergence, GN plants of C1 developed optimally in both treatments (RPF > 1, Table 2) [25]. Height and girth (Vpseudo), Nfinger and Nhand did not differ at flowering (p>0.05), whilst bunchF, finger, and Vfinger did differ between FI and RF at harvest (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Weight and size of the fingers determined the bunch weights. Plants of similar Vpseudo,flower subjected to different environments (RFH) after flowering (e.g., GN C1) will thereby have different bunchF at harvest, changing relationships between these parameters.For accurate bunch weight estimation, bunch characteristics need to be included [9,12]. Our models improved (RRMSE became lower) when bunch parameters were included, but this no longer allows forecasting of bunch weights as bunch characteristics (e.g., Vfinger) change until harvest.Our FI models can be used to forecast bunch weights if plants developed without stress from flowering onwards (as RFH >1 in FI). Forecasting of bunchF based on Vpseudo, Flower allows to estimate bunch 'potential' weights as in Equations ( 4) and (5).To estimate 'actual' bunch weights, the environmental effects during bunch filling need to be incorporated either directly (e.g., as RFH) or indirectly (e.g., effect of RFH on Vfinger).The large phenotypical differences between HG and GN plants, also led to significantly different bunch weight regression curves for cultivars (p < 0.05). However, as cultivars were planted at a different time, differences in planting might confound differences in cultivars and we should not compare these cultivars with each other. Nyombi [5] found different allometric relationships for bunch weight for two EAHB cv Mbwazirume and Kisansa. Wairegi et al. [9] proposed the use of a general banana regression curve for estimation of EAHB bunch yields, but their results showed cultivar specific curves were characterized by lower overall variances and increased model fits. Their cultivar specific curves were similar but were significantly different in model parameters. Our results support the statement that even genetically close cultivars have different phenotypical characteristics [30].A bunch forecast model based on Vpseudo,flower needs to include additional parameters that relate to environment conditions after flowering to properly work.Irrigation and corresponding soil moisture differences had a significant effect in both HG and GN, reducing vegetative and bunch growth, and delaying phenology under RF conditions. Of the effected parameters, Vpseudo seems a promising indicator as it is linked to both vegetative growth and bunch growth rates. The universal nature of Vpseudo as a regression parameter between the two cultivars is more valuable for future allometric studies than girth or height alone.Allometric relationships for vegetative biomass (ABGVD and cormD) were not strongly affected by irrigation as 95% CI overlapped between FI and RF models indicating a single allometric model can be used across RF and FI plants for vegetative biomass estimation. Models did also not differ much between our phenotypically very different cultivars for ABGVD, hinting Vpseudo models can be used across a range of cultivars. Vpseudo did not prove sufficient to estimate cormD reliably, as a lot of variation remained in the underground biomass. Aboveground characteristics are therefore lacking to estimate belowground structures. For better estimation of belowground vegetative biomass, components relating to the corm dimensions can be added although these are more difficult to measure. This research shows the potential for non-destructive vegetative biomass monitoring at the field scale, and shows soil moisture to not affect vegetative allometry significantly. As biomass over time often underlies crop simulation models, this is especially useful for researchers wanting to calculate biomass in the field for calibrating such models without destroying plants.Bunch weight (bunchF) forecasting models based on Vpseudo at flowering were significantly different between FI and RF, showing bunch weights cannot be estimated on vegetative parameters only, without including information on stress during bunch filling or bunch components. Both vegetative growth (Vrate) and moisture during bunch filling (RFH) determine bunch growth rates. Our FI models do allow prediction of bunch weights under optimal conditions after flowering (RFH≥1) and can be used to forecast bunch weight potentials based on Vpseudo at flowering.The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/9/1435/s1 Table S1: Dry matter (DM, g dry matter g fresh weight -1 ) (mean and sd) of the plant organs obtained in the field trial. Moisture contents were determined from subsamples of plant organs taken at harvest from the different cycles. Treatment differences were not significant (p<0.05), leading to the pooling of data across the treatments (FI: full irrigation and RF: rainfed) per cycle (C1, C2 and C3) to obtain a dry matter percentage per organ per cycle."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1681277680.json b/main/part_2/1681277680.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da657eb12b64a954405eac10b5fc95924aa55efb --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1681277680.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"93b09baeeb4e1e4d7b772c4180cd1342","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a666c37d-30bb-499e-9c7b-0785cf047967/retrieve","id":"-690514784"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"299c44e9-eab5-44fd-9afc-e8f1d976f715","content":"The publications in this series cover a wide range of subjects-from computer modeling to experience with water user associations-and vary in content from directly applicable research to more basic studies, on which applied work ultimately depends. Some research reports are narrowly focused, analytical and detailed empirical studies; others are wide-ranging and synthetic overviews of generic problems.Although most of the reports are published by IWMI staff and their collaborators, we welcome contributions from others. Each report is reviewed internally by IWMI staff, and by external reviewers. The reports are published and distributed both in hard copy and electronically (www.iwmi.org) and where possible all data and analyses will be available as separate downloadable files. Reports may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgment.It is widely recognized that the requirements for managing water resources effectively vary geographically and over time. In many situations there is pressure to save water, to increase water productivity or to do both. These time-related changes reflect increases in demand from users other than agriculture, such as municipality/ industry users and the environment. There are also variable impacts from government policies often influenced by international aid and regulatory agencies. The challenges for farmers, irrigation managers and water-resource policymakers are to identify and implement water policies and practices that are appropriate for the place and time, and to ensure that the institutional climate is such that these can change as the need changes.The response to the need for change reflects the technical options available to farmers and irrigation managers, costs of those changes, institutional character of the management of irrigation, and the economic and political environments at the time. In the following sections we will use the examples from Taiwan and the Philippines to illustrate the influence of these factors on the extent and nature of the governance of water resources for irrigation. The two cases reflect relatively large differences in the general context within which irrigation has evolved, thus providing the opportunity to enhance understanding of the influence of the sociopolitical environment on the need for improved water management. This is facilitated by the fact that over a number of years there has been substantial research on irrigation water management in both countries.T h e r e h a s b e e n s u s t a i n e d r e s e a r c h interest in Taiwan's irrigation sector because of its contribution to agriculture and the rapid development of the industrial sector. Similarly, there has been a significant number of studies on irrigation in the Philippines, but this has primarily focused on farmer participation or irrigation management transfer (IMT) both in communal systems (CIS) and in the national irrigation systems (NIS). This paper will focus on placing the changes in the management of irrigation water that have taken place over the past half-century in the broader economic, social and political contexts within which the sector changes have occurred. To a considerable extent, the two cases also reflect the differences in the development and management of water resources for irrigation found in East and in South/Southeast Asia (see, for example, Shah et al. 2004).Increasing water scarcity is not a consequence of there being less water, but rather there being more demand for existing water resources. In the context of water scarcity the need for water 'saving' is frequently expressed, with an emphasis on greater irrigation efficiency and increased water productivity. However, each term has a different meaning, causing confusion. Water saving is typically defined as reducing the amount of water used in growing a crop, without reference to the yield of the crop. Increasing efficiency (defined as the amount utilized by the plant divided by the amount diverted) is similar, in that it ignores the element of crop yield, but introduces the element of crop utilization of the water. Increased water productivity -the yield (either magnitude or value) per unit of water applied -explicitly changes the focus from the water to one that includes both the crop and the water. Neither of the former, water saving and increasing water efficiency, considers the benefits and costs of the increased control and management that would permit a reduction in water diversion (Kijne et al. 2003).Thus, water saving, in our view, should be viewed from the perspective of increasing the productivity of water (WP). The potential for increasing productivity can be evaluated by considering both the physical and socioeconomic components that define it. From the physical perspective, we look at the water itself. From the socioeconomic perspective, we consider both the ways the water is used and the value (both market and social) that is derived from it. It follows that from the socioeconomic perspective it is important to differentiate between water that is used productively (including the environmental benefits) and that which is nonproductive (Molden et al. 2003).To determine how much water might be diverted to uses other than the specific crop being grown, it is important to differentiate between the water that is 'saved' at the farm or system level from that which is 'saved' at the watershed or basin level (sometimes referred to as real water savings). What may be identified as 'waste' or 'excess' at the farm or system level may actually be a 'resource' that is used at a location downstream in the watershed. Thus, it is important to consider the water disposition within the watershed downstream from the area in which water saving is encouraged to determine the full impact of any changes. The potential options for water saving are greater in those basins where not all of the water has been allocated ('open' basins) than for those in which essentially all the water has been allocated ('closed' basins). In the former, utilizing the unallocated water to increase water productivity without necessarily affecting current uses is a likely priority; in the latter case, options for physical water saving and obtaining higher value from the existing or new water uses are limited. All of this suggests the need for water accounting to determine the productivity and value of water in its old and new set of uses at the basin level. In short, most 'water savings' are not easily identified and quantified. As a result, even where water is in short supply, there is often little incentive on the part of suppliers and users to save water.It also should be recognized that water saving can occur from different types of efforts, some of which do not require improved management of water resources per se. It is usual to think of the reduction in the amount of water used, but water saving is in fact occurring when efforts are made to increase the output per unit of water used, both of which can be expressed as an increase in water productivity or 'crop per drop'. Over the past few decades, a significant portion of the increase in water productivity has been due to the success of plant breeders in partitioning plant biomass toward economic yield for both rice and wheat, in other words, by changing the 'harvest index' from 80% shoots and 20% grains to 50-50 (Kijne et al. 2003;Keller and Seckler 2008). While the objective has been to increase economic yield per unit of land, it simultaneously provided an increase in the economic yield per unit of water used. The water savings covered a huge geographic, largely irrigated, area where this technology (plant biomass partitioning) was adopted. The potential for further gains from this type of partitioning is limited (Zwart and Bastiaanssen 2004). However, breeding varieties for tolerance to abiotic stresses (flooding, drought, salinity) can increase water productivity. A case in point is the newly identified sub1 gene, which when inserted into rice varieties can allow the plants to stay submerged for as long as a month (as opposed to a few days) and recover when the floods recede (Fukao et al. 2008).Improved agronomic practices have also had positive impacts on yield per unit of water used, as well as on yield per unit of land area. These include such practices as alternate wetting and drying of paddy fields, modification of planting rates and direct seeding of rice, all of which can be effective, but only when water is available as needed (Li and Barker 2004). In some locations, efforts can be made to reduce evaporation due to standing water by coordinating flooding and transplanting more appropriately, improving drainage, shifting the time of planting, etc. The difficulty here is that these practices are not often adopted system-wide or basin-wide, and it is thus difficult to measure its impact in terms of real water savings. A third avenue for increasing water productivity relates to better design and management of the irrigation system. People often marvel at the successful management of local or community irrigation systems such as the subaks of Bali in Indonesia or the zangjeras in the Philippines (Coward Jr. 1980), but bemoan the fact that so many of the large public irrigation systems are poorly managed. Also, from the economic perspective, the cost of water savings must be recognized, both from the standpoint of magnitude and who pays. While the costs of water-saving efforts vary depending upon the specifics of those efforts, in general, the costs are relatively low when the water used for irrigation is relatively abundant, but increase at an increasing rate when the supply is reduced significantly. Figure 1 illustrates the nature of this relationship, with relative water supply (RWS) 1 as the independent variable, and managerial effort/costs as the dependent variable (Levine 1982). As stated previously, the absolute values will differ depending upon the type of water-saving efforts. The illustration suggests FIGURE 1. Water managerial effort/costs versus relative water supply.Source: This study.that there is a rapid rise in managerial costs as the supply approaches the basic requirement, a RWS of 1. The rise in effort as the RWS value increases beyond 3 (i.e., too much water) implies the need to address potential drainage problems. The managerial effort required to save water may be primarily at the farm level, or shared at some level higher in the system. However, as the data presented later will show, this can be significant. Finally, water productivity can be increased on a global scale by meeting some of the local demands for water through 'importation'. For example, Mexico uses much of its limited water supply to irrigate high-value crops which it exports to the United States of America (USA), from whom in return it imports lower-value grain (Barker et al. 2000). Currently, China is also following this practice (National Bureau of Statistics of China 2009). The water associated with the production of the imported crop, referred to as virtual water (Allan 1998), represents an implicit addition to the water supply of the importing country.What follows in our two cases generally focuses on surface water resources, but is relevant to groundwater as well. Where groundwater is accessible at an affordable cost, increasing its use can lead to increased water productivity through the potential for improved control of the timing of irrigation needed, for example, in producing high-value crops. When groundwater is used conjunctively with surface water there can be a significant water saving. In situations of groundwater overdraft, physical water saving becomes important.During the first half of the twentieth century, both Taiwan and the Philippines were ruled by colonial powers. From 1895 to 1945, Taiwan was ruled by Japan, and the Philippines was ruled by the USA from 1898 to 1945 (omitting the years of Japanese occupation). Here is where the similarity ends, and the need to identify and contrast agriculture and irrigation of the two countries begins.A major objective of Japan was to obtain rice imports from her two colonies, Taiwan and Korea, and hence increasing rice production became a high priority for these two countries. However, the opportunities for expansion of the agricultural land area were limited. The land frontier in Taiwan closed in the 1920s and the typical farm size of 2 hectares (ha) began to shrink (Lee 1971;Rada and Lee 1977). Following the strategy adopted after the Meji Restoration (1868), Japan's colonial government invested in irrigation infrastructure, developed improved ponlai (japonica) varieties and encouraged the use of fertilizer. Irrigation and farmers' associations were created but controlled by the colonial government with an iron fist to ensure that farmers' made payment of irrigation fees and taxes. As a result, during the first part of the twentieth century, first Japan and then Taiwan and Korea experienced a yield-increasing 'green revolution' in rice (Figure 2)2 . This was an event that did not occur in the Philippines and the rest of South and Southeast Asia until the 1960s.Thus, development of irrigation combined with the seed-fertilizer technology was seen as the model for land productivity growth adopted decades later in the tropical Asia (Ishikawa 1967). Rice production collapsed in Taiwan during World War II. The subsequent defeat of Japan in the World War, and influx of people from the mainland in 1948, challenged the Nationalist government to achieve the pre-war annual growth in rice production of over 3%. An initial major undertaking in 1953 was the 'Land to the Tiller' program, which transferred land from landlords to tenants with approximately 40% of all farm families benefiting from the program (Yager 1988). During the 1950s, only 30% of the total outlays for irrigation were for investment, the remaining amount was mainly for maintenance and repair expenses due to neglect and war damage during the 1930s and 1940s and recovery adjustments during the 1950s (Rada and Lee 1977). The number of irrigation associations was reduced from 40 to 26. Of the 870,000 ha of cultivated land, 60% was irrigated mainly for rice (Ko 1997). The average farm size was a little over 1 ha. A number of technical and management improvements for irrigation were initiated, which will be discussed in more detail in the section, Irrigation and Water Management Practices in Taiwan and the Philippines over the Past Half-century.Under American occupation, the agricultural economy of the Philippines was dominated by the production of export crops such as sugar, copra, FIGURE 2. Rice yields in monsoon Asia (five-year moving averages).Source: Kikuchi and Hayami 1978. abaca and tobacco. From 1900 to 1960, the land area devoted to agriculture expanded at an average rate of 3% per year; growth in the latter part of the period being focused on Mindanao. Throughout this entire period there was virtually no increase in the per hectare crop yields for all commodities including rice.Early on, sugar became the primary export because of the strong demand for it in the USA and also due to the protection given by that country to products from the Philippines. This 'plantation agriculture' gave rise to landed elite families which have dominated politics, even to this day.The total irrigated area expanded to keep pace with domestic demand for rice. However, in the 1930s, planned expansion came to a halt for some time due to low rice prices, ample supplies and the difficulty of recovering operation and maintenance (O&M) fees, let alone the cost of construction (Philippine Economic Association 1934).Following World War II and Philippine independence in 1945, the Huk Rebellion (1948)(1949)(1950)(1951)(1952)(1953)(1954) in Central Luzon (the major rice growing area of the Philippines) shifted attention from export crops to rice, and issues related to both land reform and irrigation development. The government began to focus on rice self-sufficiency. With the gradual closing of the land frontier, inducing investment in irrigation to increase land productivity can be seen as a clearly rational decision (Hayami and Kikuchi 1978).As shown in the previous section, the two examples reflect relatively large differences in the general context within which irrigation has evolved, thus providing the opportunity to explore the social, economic and political environmental impacts on the ways irrigation has been managed. We will highlight management practices that have been adopted to increase water productivity.Entering the decade of the 1960s, in Taiwan, approximately 40% of gross domestic product (GDP) came from agriculture and 50% of the labor force was employed in agriculture (Figure 3a). As has been the custom in the early stages of development, most developing countries have taxed agriculture to transfer resources for the development of the non-agricultural sector (Lee 1971). In Taiwan, this was achieved through the fertilizer-rice barter system, where the government controlled the supply of fertilizer.Most of the arable land in Taiwan was irrigated and planted two crops of rice, but the irrigation systems were badly in need of repair. Initially, as a consequence of limited water control, it was necessary to plant only rice in the paddy fields. Soon, however, the restoration and improvements in the irrigation infrastructure described below facilitated the production of a wide variety of crops, though rice remained dominant.B a s i c a l l y , t h e s t r u c t u r e o f i r r i g a t i o n management in Taiwan has been one of a collaborative relationship between groups of farmer-irrigators and technical support staff combined initially into an Irrigation Committee, and subsequently (by 1956), into an Irrigation Association (IA). In principle, the farmers control the workings of the technical staff through a process that has changed over time (More on this is explained in later sections). While reflecting on this principle, the actual relationships are very complex, vary among the IAs and have changed significantly over time. The structure differs markedly from that found in many other countries. There is no central irrigation agency, such as the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) in the Philippines, the Royal Irrigation Department in Thailand, and the various State Irrigation Departments in India. Each IA has been, to a considerable extent, a 'self-contained' unit, subject to some regulatory oversight by a central agency, the Water Conservancy Bureau, and with technical support from the Sino-American Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction (JCRR), which recently transformed into the Council of Agriculture. We describe the evolution of water productivity improvement in the country from the perspective of the intent of the programs that have been implemented, even though the degree of implementation is not uniform among the IAs.To consider this pattern and its meaning for water productivity, we will consider three major events: the land consolidation program, the implementation of rotation irrigation, and the adjustment to entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) including water transfer.The Land Consolidation program was a ten-year program initiated in 1961. The major objective of the program was to increase production efficiency, but it had a secondary effect of providing physical infrastructure that made water management (both irrigation and drainage) easier. The program consolidated the fragmented holdings into single reshaped units which were then provided with direct access to an irrigation channel, a drainage channel and to a path or road. An elaborate process of evaluating the productive capacity of each fragmented parcel, and then reallocating a parcel of equivalent productivity, combined with improved infrastructure, formed the basis for the program. The farmer's share of the cost of the program was reflected in the loss of 5% of the area of the fragmented holdings, based on the assumption that the increased efficiency and improved access to water, drainage and roads would more than compensate. In addition, the farmers paid part of the cost of the infrastructure with long-term loans.The program resulted in increased efficiency of the agricultural activity and provided the ability to intensify cropping. There was no significant change in the water used per hectare, but there was a 'saving' in terms of the increase in water productivity.The second major development, the rotation irrigation program, was initiated in the same general period as the land consolidation program, and basically continues to this day. It followed a severe drought during which water was rotated among the users and it became apparent that production could be maintained with less water for irrigation. Prior to the program, irrigation was primarily continuous flow. Water was applied to keep the fields flooded, and there was both field-to-field and channeled flows. Head-end irrigators were advantaged, both in delivery and protection from excessive flooding. With both production and equity considerations in mind, the government proposed a program of rotation irrigation, a type that required both significant technical infrastructure (both physical and institutional), and close collaboration among the farmers and between the farmers and the operating staff. Implementation was fostered by a national extension program with funds to pay for much of the technical infrastructure and other forms of assistance to the water users. During this same general period, the Irrigation Committees were converted to Irrigation Associations, with a Representative Assembly and elected Chairman 3 and the number of associations was reduced to 26 from the 40 Irrigation Committees 4 .The rotation irrigation program has been described in detail in a number of publications (Chin 1961;Ko and Levine 1972;Wen 1980), but briefly, the farmers essentially have complete control and responsibility for the distribution of the water within an area of approximately 150 ha (Small Group Area). The IA staff is responsible for ensuring that the allocation to subunits of that area (usually about 50 ha each) is in accordance with the IA rules.When the supply of water is adequate, allocation of the water to various parts of the IA service area is based upon prior water rights, some of which were associated with earlier systems merged into the IA. Management of the water delivery to the Small Group Area is of a 'default upward' character (Levine 1991).When there is a significant water shortage, generally in the order of 25% of normal, the original water rights are abrogated with agreement among the farmers in the Small Group Area, and allocation decision is shifted to the next higher level of control (~500 ha); irrigation allocations to the component areas are then based upon technical rules. Increase in the size of the control area permits the more equitable sharing of the water shortage, as well as making more efficient use of the scarce water. This pattern of movement of allocation control upwards continues, and may encompass the entire IA if water availability worsens. When the supply increases, control reverts downwards. While the allocations have a technical base, actual control of the delivery to the individual farmers remains in the hands of the farmers 5 , though they may hire a common irrigator to do the actual irrigating, thus minimizing potential for conflict. This close relationship between the farmers and the IA staff, and the 'ownership' of the IA by the farmers, is illustrated by an experience in the field by Gilbert Levine (one of the authors of this report). In one of the Small Group Areas, the Chief Engineer of the IA, an IA Irrigation Attendant from the local Working Station, a senior engineer from JCRR and the author (Levine) were discussing the water measurement practices, when an angry farmer came to the group, singled out the Irrigation Attendant 6 and demanded that he do something about his down-channel neighbor who had blocked the channel, resulting in flooding of the complaining farmer's field. It was clear that the farmer knew who had the responsibility to ensure the system was working, and that this person was responsible for the actions of the down-channel neighbor. The fact that the farmer's fee paid the staff salaries was also clear to the technician. Rotation irrigation, as practiced in Taiwan, generally resulted in substantial physical water saving, but of variable amounts and with significant costs. Beyond the costs associated with the land consolidation program, there were additional costs for measuring structures and gates, which were partially subsidized, and for the increased staff. Table 1 shows the change in O&M costs as a result of implementing rotation irrigation in six IAs; all IAs had increases above 100%. The water saving was variable but generally in the order of 25%. The reason for the increased costs was the increased technical capacity (Table 2), which is designed to meet the needs of severe water shortage, but is in excess most of the time. Of the total cost associated with rotation irrigation, approximately two-thirds was borne by the farmers and the remainder by the government.It should be pointed out that the Taiwan systems generally operated at a RWS (quantity delivered divided by the quantity required by the plant) of between 2 and 2.5 7 , which indicates that significant water savings could be achieved at increasingly higher costs. For example, during a severe drought in the Yun Lin IA, to approach a RWS close to 1, the IA staff monitored the parshall measuring flumes at the 50-ha irrigation area levels night and day; the main channel 8 Personal communication to Gilbert Levine (one of the authors of this report) by a group of senior IA engineers in 1969. was dredged to obtain maximum inflow to the system; when there was any flow in the drainage channels it was recovered through pumping; and the farmers used common irrigators to avoid personal conflict (Levine 1983). Production was approximately 95% as normal with approximately one-half of the customary supply.It is also important to note that, in addition to the educational and financial aspects of the implementation process, there was a significant political commitment at the local as well as the national level. In a number of cases, head-end farmers objected to the implementation of rotation, and force was used to compel compliance. In more than one instance these resisters were jailed, usually only for a day or two, but it was sufficient to indicate that this was a government priority 8 .As indicated earlier, while the rotation irrigation program was designed to be applied throughout Taiwan, not all IAs fully implemented the program, and in those IAs that did not implement it there was little change in water use. The primary reason for the variability in implementation was the relative abundance of the water supply, often based on groundwater (Lam 1996).The rotation irrigation program lasted essentially as described for approximately 15 years, with an increasing politicization of the election process for the IA Chairman. This, and increasing complaints about the IA cost, irrigation service and falling farm incomes relative to non-farm incomes (Levine et al. 2000), resulted in a fiveyear trial consisting of closer supervision of IA operations by the government, appointment of the Chairmen by the government and a reduction in the number of IAs to 17. There was an improvement in performance, modest reduction in IA staff and a small reduction in the user contribution to IA expenses. However, concern developed that the IAs were becoming increasingly technocratic and susceptible to a lack of interest on the part of the government. At the end of the five-year period, the IAs were permitted to return to the prior arrangements, with a modified representative assembly (Small Group Leaders, rather than the farmers), an elected Chairman and more stringent rules for IA operation.Notwithstanding the modest improvements in service, the financial position of the farmers worsened, in comparison to the non-farm sectors. As a result, the government increased the subsidy to the IAs until (by 2000) the farmers paid no irrigation fee to the IA and many of the IAs were looking for other sources of income. As stated earlier, the combined land consolidation and rotation irrigation programs did result in a physical water saving of approximately 20-25%, but part of this 'saving' was due to the reduction in the paddy rice cropped area facilitated by the programs. By 1993, the reduction in paddy rice area was approximately one-third (Annual Statistical Data, 1973-1994 (Taiwan Irrigation Associations n.d.)). At the field level, however, the average seasonal application per hectare for paddy increased by approximately 5%. This suggests that irrigators will reduce their managerial effort to the least costly rate of use when the supply is available, even when the physical and managerial infrastructure for more efficient operation is in place.The removal of the farmer fee had the additional effects of reducing farmer interest in contributing to the voluntary system maintenance and increasing the social distance from the technical staff (Ko 1997). It should be noted, however, that the physical water saving was also a reflection of the increasing per hectare yield that permitted the reduction in area while still meeting the national target for rice production.The entry of the Taiwan into the World Trade Organization (WTO) introduced a new and significant element into the water management equation. The requirement to enter into the international rice market through international purchases of rice accelerated the need to reduce domestic production.At the same time, there was increasing pressure to transfer water from agriculture to non-agricultural uses. According to the prevailing water law, water is permitted to be transferred from water-rights holders to other users whenever the need is clear and there is agreement on compensation. However, in the event of extensive drought, the government steps in to perform emergency water transfers by suspending water rights. Huang et al. (2007) provides examples of both these types of transfers. In the case of a normal transfer from the Changhwa and Yunlin IAs to the Formosa Petrochemical Corporation, no agreement could be reached on compensation after a year of negotiation. The Central Region Water Resources Office then stepped in and set the price. In the second example, an emergency transfer of water from the Taoyuan, Shimen and Sinchu IAs to domestic and industrial users took place from the period 2002 to 2006.Additionally, questions were raised by the WTO about Taiwan's subsidy to agriculture, including payments to the IAs. This combination of (i) increasing political pressure to reduce subsidies, (ii) increasing pressure to transfer water from the agricultural to the domestic and industrial sectors, and (iii) increasing recognition that paddy culture had significant impacts on environmental services, prompted efforts to evaluate the net benefits from the ecological services provided by paddy culture and to consider those in justifying continued payments to the IAs. Recent studies of two IAs in northern Taiwan have evaluated the economic effects of water transfer, including the loss of environmental services as well as the loss in production (Chang and Boisvert 2010). A comparison of these losses with the compensation payments made by the government suggests that the payments still exceed the losses significantly. If this conclusion is borne out by additional more comprehensive studies of other parts of Taiwan, there will not only be increased pressure to transfer additional water from the agricultural sector, but also increased pressure on the IAs to increase the efficiency of their operations and to generate income from sources other than agriculture.Finally, we emphasize the important role that the non-farm sector has played and the effect this has had on farm and irrigation policy. As economies develop, the share of agriculture in GDP falls and the labor force in agriculture falls more slowly (Tomich et al. 1995). This is shown for Taiwan in Figure 3a. In the early stages of development, agriculture is taxed, but as the non-farm sector grows, first the agricultural taxes are removed and subsequently agriculture is subsidized. The switch from taxation to subsidization is common to all agricultural imports and exports, although imports are always less taxed or more protected (Lindert 1991). The rise in the non-farm economy was extremely rapid in Taiwan. In 1970, the tax (fertilizer-rice barter system) was removed. By the mid-1980s only 10% of the labor force remained in agriculture. Farmers no longer paid irrigation fees. The IAs were gaining political and economic strength through subsidies, and Taiwan, following Japan, was rapidly becoming a nation of part-time farmers. Today, there is a focus on ecosystem services provided by paddy rice and the transfer of water to industry.In 1960, irrigation in the Philippines was predominantly through river-diversions, primarily for rice. The rice area irrigated was close to 1 million hectares (Mha) or approximately one Source: Huang-hao Chang, National Taiwan University (data for Taiwan). quarter of the total rice area (Rose 1985). The farm size was typically 2 to 3 ha. However, in the most densely populated area of the Philippines, the Illocos, farms were typically only 1 hectare in size. Ancient communal irrigation systems called zangheras were noted for their excellent water management (Lewis 1980).As of 1960, 60% of the labor force was in agriculture accounting for 30% of GDP (Figure 3b), percentages which were not very different from Taiwan (Figure 3a). Most of the farmers were tenants, who, in the case of rice, paid 50% of the harvest to landlords.The discussion in this section is divided into five subsections dealing with the development of the irrigation sector in the Philippines. It is a story of both success and failure and contrasts sharply with the development of irrigation over the same period in Taiwan. The story brings focus to the preconditions for success.The 1960s marked the beginning of the drive for self-sufficiency in rice, which, with a rapidly growing population remains an elusive target even today. According to the current Aquino administration, they will phase out imports completely in 2013. Economists have questioned this priority given the diverse environment of an island economy (Dawe et al. 2006), which is to say that importing rice is not a bad thing. However, politicians consistently express the need to avoid reliance on imports from an unstable world rice market.The establishment of the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) in 1964 brought 79 National Irrigation Systems (NIS) serving 217,000 ha under one agency (Panella 2004). At the time there were 771 Communal Irrigation Systems (CIS) (mostly 100 to 200 ha in size) totaling 393,000 ha and an estimated 2,450 pumps/tube wells covering 51,000 ha (Panella 2004).Ferdinand Marcos, elected for the first time in 1965, was to become NIA's strongest political supporter. In 1966, Marcos appointed Alfredo Junio, Chair of the University of the Philippines, College of Engineering, as administrator of the NIA. Junio served as administrator until 1980, and it was under his leadership that the NIA developed into a highly regarded irrigation bureaucracy.NIA is divided into two units, construction, and operation and maintenance (O&M). For the viability of the NIA in this period of expansion, the construction was seen as being more critical than O&M. The primary focus was on obtaining loans from international donors, in particular, the World Bank (WB) and the newly established Asian Development Bank (ADB) (1966). In the early stage of its development, the NIA relied heavily on the support of the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) for the designing of new multipurpose systems and the training of NIA personnel.At the same time, it should be recognized that the primary experience of the USBR was in the design and construction of major physical works, including dams, major channels, etc., in the western part of the United States, which is a dry area. The design and implementation of the smaller irrigation systems were generally the responsibility of other organizations, usually irrigation districts with their own governing boards, managers and technical staff. Water rights were typically associated with individuals and water delivered 'on demand', and the farms were relatively large in comparison with that in the Philippines. As a result of this experience and with the emphasis on new construction, the focus of the training was on the development of the organizational infrastructure, personnel to carry out the planning of large multi-purpose dams and maintenance of the physical structures. System operation was probably addressed only in theoretical terms with the details left to the NIA and staff. Issues of water rights, user-controlled irrigation districts or other aspects relating to the use of the water were not likely to be part of staff training. This is in sharp contrast to the situation in Taiwan, where the emphasis was on improvements in irrigation at the user level and on the need for a close relationship between the farmer and IA staff.Farmers were expected to pay the cost of O&M, but normally the collection of fees only covered about half of the requirement for proper maintenance. Thus, from the beginning, the operations of the NIA were heavily subsidized by the Philippine Government despite later efforts to make NIA financially self-reliant.In 1972, the rice sector of the Philippines, and that of many other Asian countries, experienced what has come to be known as an el nino. The heavy monsoon rains and the flooding resulted in a 20% loss of the main crop in Central Luzon. Elsewhere, in parts of the Philippines and the rest of Asia experienced drought. World rice prices skyrocketed and there was a shortage of rice from exporting countries such as Thailand. In 1973, Philippine rice imports were the highest in more than a decade and the country was forced to import white corn to mix with rice.This 'shock' to the rice sector in the Philippines had the effect of reinforcing the drive for self-sufficiency. In the years immediately following: (1) NIA continued its expansion of the irrigated area with financial support from international donors, and with funding for new projects reaching a peak in 1980 (Figure 4); (2) the government, complementing the development of irrigation, launched the 'Masagana 99' program to promote modern rice technology and provide farmers with low interest loans, many of which were never repaid; and (3) a program was initiated to involve farmers directly in water management below the main turnout commonly referred to as irrigation management transfer (IMT). It is to IMT that we now turn our attention.There was a growing concern in the 1970s that water resources for irrigation were being 'poorly managed'. Depending upon the emphasis given by the individual stakeholder (including farmers, irrigation administrators, politicians, etc.), good management would include issues such as productivity, equity and financial viability. In the early 1970s, two research studies were conducted by the International Rice Research (Wickham and Wickham 1974). Yield per hectare and yield per cubic meter of water showed no significant difference between rotation irrigation and continuous flooding at all three sites. As noted in the previous section on Taiwan, for a normal year this is what one could expect.The real impact of rotation irrigation (Taiwan style) occurs in a drought year when the infrastructure and the capacity to manage water make it possible for more effective use of limited quantities of water. NIA initiated a trial of the Taiwan-style rotation structure, with 50-ha areas and 10-ha units. No results of the trial were published, but it was not continued or replicated. One would have to conclude that the cost of making the required changes in both the physical and institutional structures was too great for whatever benefit that could be anticipated. In contrast to Taiwan, in the dry years, NIA found that cutting off delivery to the tail-end of the system made it easier to manage and allocate the limited water supply.In the second research study (Valera et al. 1975), IRRI obtained permission from NIA to operate Lateral C of the Peñaranda River Irrigation System in Central Luzon with a service area of close to 6,000 ha. Randolph Barker (the lead author of this report) was involved in this project.The objective was to address the ubiquitous headtail problem. The plan was simple. The tail-ender farms would plant first, and during the growing season water would be provided to the tail-end four days in the week and to the head-end three days in the week. The main canal was divided into four sections and the sub-laterals were monitored by four staff to ensure that farmers did not interfere with the plan. The son of the mayor of the local town owned land at the head of the system and objected to this plan strenuously. By convincing him that his yields would not suffer, the project was allowed to move ahead.Table 3 compares the dry seasons of 1974 and 1975, following implementation of the plan. While there was a slight gain in yield in all four sections, the area irrigated and the production of rice rose sharply in section 3 and 4 of Lateral C. Some years after completion of the study, we talked with a NIA water-master who was familiar with the project. What had happened since? Was our plan still being adopted? He simply said, \"same mayor, same son.\" They were back to the old system.A presidential decree in 1974 (PD 552) greatly increased NIA's financial responsibility and purview over irrigation activities (Panella 2004). The first step in the improvement of water management was the adoption of participatory irrigation management (PIM) as a strategy to manage the communal irrigation systems (CIS), many of which the NIA now had responsibility for. The basic concept of the new approach was for the government to provide financial and technical assistance, but this had to be in a manner so that it would maximize the farmer's participation in the planning, design and construction of the system, as well as operation and maintenance (Bagadion 1988).In fact, the focus on PIM was, in large measure, due to the establishment of the communal irrigation committee (CIC) to assist the NIA (Panella 2004). The CIC is perhaps unique in the annals of irrigation development. It consisted of a number of academic stakeholders representing a range of expertize and disciplines, and NIA personnel. The CIC recognized that there were a number of communal systems being successfully managed by farmers, such as the zanjeras in Ilocos Norte (Lewis 1980;Siy Jr. 1982), and a number of research studies were undertaken to identify both the opportunities and constraints in the PIM approach.One such study by De los Reyes and Jopillo (1988) compared 24 systems where PIM had been implemented with 22 non-participatory systems. The cost of implementing PIM was only 3% of the total cost of construction. Mean rice yields were approximately half a tonne higher (3 versus 2.5 tonnes) for systems under PIM. However, there was recognition of considerable scope for improvement. By 1984, the NIA had learned to implement this new approach efficiently on a nationwide scale. In fact, the NIA gained international recognition for its innovative approach to irrigation management (Korten and Siy Jr. 1988).Moving the focus of PIM away from the communal to the national irrigation systems posed a number of problems. For example, first, there was a lack of alignment of stakeholders (NIA personnel, farmers and landowners, politicians and WB) with the objectives of the reform. Second, there was little actual involvement of the farmers in the planning, design and construction of the irrigation system. The focus was on shifting responsibilities to the IAs. A three-stage process was devised for the turnover. Stage I required routine maintenance to be carried out by the IA in return for a 2% share of the fees collected. The Stage II contract gave the IAs full responsibility for O&M of canals and a larger share of fee collections. Stage III contracts gave full responsibility to the IAs for management of the entire system. Although, later, at the request of WB, these contracts were renamed, type I, II and III, and there was no intention that IAs would graduate from stage I to III. The NIA employees, worried about their future jobs, applauded WB's insistence, under the first rehabilitation loan, that for type II contracts the NIA be given responsibility for O&M (Panella 2004). Subsequently, however, NIA staff concentrated on fee collection at the expense of O&M, although the irrigation service fee collections continued to be less than 50% of O&M costs.Next, there is the question of how the irrigation systems operated on the ground level. Here, it is useful to see the contrast between the operation of the Taiwan and the Philippine systems. One may regard the Taiwan approach to management as semi-authoritarian, in that administration and the ability to demand compliance trumped politics at the local level. In the Philippines, it was the opposite.In the 1990s, Oorthuizen (2003Oorthuizen ( , 2004) ) undertook a detailed study of the adoption of the NIA turnover program in two IAs, one each in zones 1 and 2 of the fourth district of UPRIS. Once again, the issue revolved principally around the distribution of water resources during the dry season, the period of water scarcity. Oorthuizen notes that, two evaluation studies conducted in the early 1990s claimed that the turnover program had resulted in increased fee collection, reduced personnel costs, a larger irrigated area and higher dry-season yields. Oorthuizen argues, however, that these studies overlooked the implementation of the turnover policies in different irrigation systems and how these policies are given shape at the grassroots level.When the IA in zone 1 of the UPRIS first experienced water scarcity in the dry season of 1983-1984, politicians became the central actors in water management, giving much time and effort to the allocation of water. With implementation of the NIA program, this had not changed. The situation in the IA in zone 2 was entirely different. The adoption of the NIA program was 'successful', but due in large part to the close family ties between NIA personnel and the village at the tailend of the system. In general, it appears that NIA personnel tended to interact with a selected group of farmers in the IAs. Many farmers did not even know that they were a member of an IA.It is perhaps a paradox that the end of the Marcos Administration (1986) and the advent of the more open society of the Aquino administration brought problems to the NIA. Junio, the long-time administrator of the NIA, retired in 1980, and in 1986, another champion of NIA reform, Bagadion, was gone. The leadership became politicized, a series of NIA administrators, often with no knowledge of irrigation, served as directors for three years or less.A decline in the capital growth of the NIA led to a decline in the numbers of NIA personnel. In the late 1970s, project personnel reached a peak of 20,000, but from the 1990s onward this number was only one to 3,000. Operations personnel, reaching a similar peak of 20,000, declined more slowly to the present level of 7,000. This led to 'deferred maintenance'. Routine O&M became neglected as NIA staff concentrated on irrigation service fee (ISF) collections to maintain the financial viability of the NIA. The willingness of the WB and ADB to provide relatively frequent rehabilitation loans has supported the practice of deferred maintenance globally. Under many situations, the policy of deferred maintenance has been a rational response to the combination of farmer adjustment to declining service, politics and continuing availability of development bank rehabilitation loans (Levine 1986). However, the need for rehabilitation of some systems in the Philippines (that have had no O&M in less than a decade), raises questions not only about the lack of maintenance but also about the quality of initial construction.WB and ADB have continued to press for the turnover of O&M responsibility to irrigator associations at the secondary and tertiary levels, not just in the Philippines but elsewhere (Mukherji et al. 2009) 9 . In the Philippines, training programs were set up by the NIA for the IA leaders, but often there was very little interaction between the IA officers, board and the average farmers, many of whom, as noted above, didn't know they were members of their respective IAs.Three surveys were conducted to assess the performance and factors associated with 'good performance' of the IAs (NIA 1999;Fujiie et al. 2005;Araral 2009). While factors such as water scarcity, size of IA and nearness to market affected 'performance', performance was not measured in terms of an increase in water productivity or greater equity but rather by factors such as maintenance and fee collection. The case studies by Valera et al. (1975), in the section, Early implementation of participatory irrigation management in the 1970s and 1980s, and Oorthuizen (2003, in the section, Institutionalization of participatory irrigation management, give a better sense of the constraints associated with PIM and the performance of the IAs at the grassroots level.Obtaining loans from WB and ADB required compliance with their IMT programs. Thus, the Philippines did not experiment with other institutional forms for managing water. In China, for example, the IA model of WB was being adopted in some irrigation systems. However, China was also adopting a variety of contract arrangements (Shah et al. 2004). To evaluate these arrangements, research was conducted by the Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy in several surface irrigation systems in north China (Huang et al. 2008). It was identified that the best results in terms of water saving at village/ association level were obtained by contractors provided with incentives.Almost all of the Philippine irrigation literature deals with gravity irrigation systems, i.e., the 10 Christina David, Philippine Institute for Development Studies, is currently examining the various sources of data from the Census and elsewhere to arrive at a reasonable estimate of the area irrigated by pumps. national irrigation systems (NIS), the communal irrigation systems (CIS) and the NIA. In the last two decades, the area irrigated by gravity irrigation systems has remained fairly constant at around 1.3 Mha. However, the total irrigated area has continued to rise (Figure 5). This has been due to the sharp increase in the area irrigated by low-lift pumps which, since the 1990s, has occurred not only in the Philippines but also elsewhere in Asia. This is frequently referred to as the groundwater revolution (Barker and Molle 2004), a period of groundwater exploitation and in much of the semiarid regions there is overexploitation (Shah 2009).As David notes, much more information is needed to find out whether, and to what extent, pumps are being used in the wet and/or dry season, among tail-enders and for crops other than rice.Competition for water from non-agricultural uses has been confined mainly to the urban areas, particularly Metro Manila and Cebu. Over the past two decades, water from the Angat Dam and Reservoir has been gradually transferred to meet the demands of Manila (Figure 6), apparently without compensation to farmers. One of the most important factors in the development of Philippine agriculture has been the expansion of irrigation. This was made possible by loans from the international agencies such as the World Bank, some of whose policies we have examined in the previous sections. In 1960, there were 4.5 Mha of rice, of which an area of 1 Mha was irrigated. Today, there are 4.5 Mha of rice, of which an area of 3 Mha is irrigated. Rice yields have grown by more than 2% per annum. Despite this achievement, rice self-sufficiency remains an elusive target (Table 4). The problems would seem to lie outside of the rice-producing sector. At 2% per annum, population growth remains the highest in Asia. Furthermore, in contrast to Taiwan, the percentage of agriculture in GDP has been declining more slowly (Figure 3b), reflecting the slow growth in the non-agricultural sector.There is considerable debate as to the actual per capita consumption of rice in the Philippines, but it appears that it remains fairly high and stable while in most other Asian countries it is declining. This is related to the slow growth of the urban population and labor force where the substitute of other commodities for rice is most pronounced.Based on our observations of the development of irrigation in two contrasting situations, in Taiwan and the Philippines, we draw some general conclusions. We believe that these conclusions apply more generally to situations found in much of Asian agriculture.1. The determination of irrigation 'water saving' is difficult because of the ambiguity of the term.• Even when the term refers only to a reduction in the physical amount of water used for productive purposes, the boundaries of the area of concern can significantly affect the conclusions that can be drawn. For example, water applied in excess of evapotranspiration will leave an irrigation system through percolation to the groundwater or through surface runoff; whether this water is a 'loss' to be 'saved' depends upon whether it is subsequently used productively, either by pump users or surface water users downstream.• Thus, any evaluation of real, physical water saving must encompass at a minimum, the entire watershed. This suggests the need for 'water accounting' at that level.• W h e n w a t e r s a v i n g i s d e f i n e d a s increasing the utility of the water supply, then the evaluation must be based on the benefit derived from its use. If, for example, the economic return from the water is increased through investment in improvements in cropping (better varieties, more valuable crops, etc.) effectively, water saving occurs. Even though the objective of the 'green revolution' was to increase yield (value of output) per hectare and not save water, the increase in water productivity over the past half century has come serendipitously largely through varietal improvement.2. Physical water saving is unlikely to occur at the farm level, except when the available water supply is reduced. In evaluating the impact of changes in irrigation, 'water productivity' is a more appropriate measure.Water productivity can be expressed in both physical and socioeconomic terms.• The Taiwan experience shows that even with strong physical and institutional infrastructure, the amount of water applied per hectare (often referred to as irrigation efficiency) does not necessarily change significantly. The area under rice has reduced over time, while rice production has increased, as has production of higher-value non-rice crops. The financial and social costs of physical water saving, or reducing the amount of water diverted at the farm level, can be large. Increased financial investment, as well as increased time and effort and increased coordination among farmers are required.• When these costs are sufficiently large, and where groundwater is accessible, farmers in large numbers will invest in pumps, as is occurring in the Philippines.3. The extent of system-level operational management actually applied is a function of the available physical and institutional infrastructure, the available supply of water and political will.• I n T a i w a n , n o t w i t h s t a n d i n g t h e infrastructure availability (both physical and institutional) to deliver measured amounts of water to the 50-hectare level (approximately 50 farmers), the full capability was generally used only in cases of severe drought.• The existence of the physical and institutional capacity in the IAs in Taiwan permitted inclusion of non-rice crops as the economy changed.• In the case of Taiwan, the objectives for exercising a high level of management d u r i n g d r o u g h t i n c l u d e d b o t h t h e maintenance of production and the equitable sharing of the burden of the water shortage.• In the case of the Philippines, even when there was the physical and institutional infrastructure to deliver water to sublaterals and below, during drought, the NIA response to drought tends to be a reduction in the area served.Reducing the area served is assumed to reduce losses in water delivery, ease the workload on the system staff and maintain the water supply to the favored area (often a necessary political objective). Equity is not an operable objective and the tail-enders are typically the ones that are cut off. More recently in the Philippines, tail-end farmers are purchasing low-lift pumps to assure an adequate supply of water for the dryseason crop. The ability to obtain water on demand allows farmers the flexibility of growing crops other than rice.4. The sociopolitical environment greatly influences the physical characteristics of the irrigation system, its institutional structure and the evolution of both.• In the case of Taiwan, the 'Land to the Tiller' program (in which one hectare of land was provided to each family in the rural population), followed by the Land Consolidation and Improvement program, coupled with the formation of farmer-governed Irrigation Associations, established an effective basis for the twin objectives of equity and productivity.Notwithstanding the un-centralized character of the irrigation sector (with no national irrigation agency), these objectives have been maintained to the present time.• In contrast, in the Philippines, areas with large landholdings with tenant farmers were conducive to governmentmanaged systems, within a national framework. Production was a basic objective, but with financial viability of the irrigation agency as a major rationale for engaging the water users through water users associations. Given the sociopolitical conditions, equity was not an objective even where greater equity (i.e., resolution of head/tailend problems) would have increased productivity. In contrast, in those areas where landholdings were smaller, farmer-managed communal systems developed and equity in water delivery was achievable.5. International agencies can significantly affect both the incentives for improved water management and the ability to achieve improvement.• In the case of Taiwan, international agencies, such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank, had little or no impact on irrigation development. However, the USA-funded Sino-American Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction (JCRR), in collaboration with academic institutions in the country, was a major force in providing financial resources, the intellectual backstopping and incentives for improvements in irrigation at the sector level and also at the IA level. As a result, while the technological advancements mirrored those occurring more widely in the world, the evolution of the institutional infrastructure was 'home-grown'. In fact, during the 1970s and 1980s, Taiwan was frequently used as a model for other countries, including the Philippines, to follow.• In the Philippines, five international a g e n c i e s , r e p r e s e n t i n g t e c h n i c a l , intellectual and financial inputs played significant roles in the development and evolution of the irrigation sector. In the 1960s and 1970s, the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), as part of the United States aid program, trained staff of the national systems in the planning, design and operation of 'modern' irrigation systems; the Ford Foundation fostered experiments in the strengthening of the institutional structures of the communal systems and in the introduction of similar structures into the national systems; and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) (an institution of the World Bank Group), and subsequently, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), were instrumental in financing the construction of major elements of the national irrigation system in the 1970s and the 1980s, and in subsequently pressuring for the transfer of various levels of responsibility of O&M to farmer groups (so-called irrigation management transfer (IMT)), both in the national and communal systems.• In the national systems, with pressure and incentives from the lenders, repeated efforts by the NIA since the 1980s to introduce irrigation management transfer (IMT) have met with little success. Fee collections have remained at around 50% of billings, and the willingness to provide loans for rehabilitation creates an incentive for deferred maintenance.• In summary, while the lending agencies have been vital to the development of Philippine irrigation, certain aspects of their policies have been counterproductive to the twin goals of productivity and equity in the Philippine environment.6. Economic development has both pull and push effects that impact on the irrigation sector.• The higher wages associated with industrial and commercial development draw labor from the rural sector. In the case of Taiwan, this had a number of effects on the irrigation sector. The immediate effect was to make it difficult for the water users and the IA system operators to exercise the relatively high-labor input that is characteristic of rice production. As a result, there was a reduction in the area devoted to rice production (partially from a shift to vegetable production and more recently from a shifting out of agriculture) and a reduction in the percentage of family income derived from rice farming. A consequence was the reduction in farmer involvement in the governance of the IA.• The higher costs associated with the more-developed Taiwan economy, the reduced profitability of rice production and the increased demands of the technical staff of the IA (both in serving the needs of the more varied cropping patterns and also as a consequence of reduced staffing) resulted in a shift from taxation of agriculture in the 1970s to a complete subsidization at the present time.• In contrast, in the Philippines, economic development was much slower with less economic pressure to alter the relationship between the government and the water users. As indicated above, however, the external forces focused attention on the institutional issues, with a significant emphasis on obtaining a greater participation of the water users in payment for the system operating costs.• Typically, when the share of agriculture in national GDP drops below 10 to 15%, subsidization of irrigation and other elements in the agricultural sector occurs. This point was reached by Taiwan in the early 1980s and is only gradually being achieved in the Philippines in the last decade. However, the Philippines has been subsidizing irrigation for some time due perhaps in part to the pressure to achieve self-sufficiency.7. Recognition of the importance of irrigation in relation to the environment has grown since 2000, but is still limited.• In Taiwan, partly as a consequence of the country's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO), and partly as a result of increasing interest in environmental issues by urbanites, the roles of irrigation in providing environmental services (positive and negative) have gained increased attention. Since payment for these services is not considered a subsidy, careful evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with these services can provide a reasonable basis for determining the appropriate level of payment.• In the Philippines, neither pressure from the WTO nor influence of the urban sector interest has reached the point of significant environmental concern related to irrigation.Comparison of the Taiwan and the Philippine experiences suggests that a shift from a focus on physical water saving to one of water productivity, particularly if viewed in a basin context, would broaden significantly the perceived options for irrigation improvement. Instead of limiting the options to changes on-farm and to technical, and perhaps institutional, modifications to irrigation systems (many of which have high financial costs), a change in focus would provide more appropriate consideration to the prioritization of critical geographic areas, the roles of cropping interventions, financial incentives, political factors and to the impacts on the environment. The comparison between the two countries also suggests that a failure to adequately address issues of equity in design and/or in implementation of water delivery is a major factor in the search for 'real water savings' and gains in water productivity."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1682931497.json b/main/part_2/1682931497.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..940466e55ecd82c573a3810d159cfaf8c51d4ab6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1682931497.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"79f6297dd020523f869992269112e71c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/289b3efb-2a84-4e31-93b7-a5f51ba3fb9e/retrieve","id":"-505743489"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1ce26edd-e4f5-4846-a7e4-b636feb65f9d","content":"Livestock production, especially dairy, has long been an important activity for smallholder and resource-poor farmers in India, both for household nutrition and income. Generally, crop residues and communal or free-of-cost resources provided the basis for feeding the animals. However, rising levels of human and livestock densities in combination with stricter enforcement of environmental regulations and intensified cropping patterns have reduced access to common feed sources. This is especially relevant for the densely populated Indo-Gangetic Plains where most of the South Asian rural poor live and where most of the communal lands have been progressively privatised.Most of the livestock in these regions are kept in mixed farming systems, where crop residuesmainly cereal straws--have been an important feed resource (>44% of feeds) as in much of the rest of India (NIANP 2003). With the increasing unavailability of grazed or collected feeds, straws are currently dominating livestock feed rations.India is deficient in the supply of fodder, resulting in very low levels of productivity that limit marketable surplus of milk. In Bihar State, over 50% of the land area is planted to rice, and rice straw along with smaller quantities of wheat straw and some pulse residues form the main animal feeds. Recent studies in the Indo-Gangetic Plain have highlighted the problem of insufficient fodder and the poor nutritive value of fodder, a problem which becomes more acute in the more eastern parts of the region where agricultural resources-particularly arable land and water-become scarcer. This fodder scarcity affects most farmers but is particularly acute for landless and those with access to only small areas of land. Chronic feed deficit is the major constraint to animal production in eastern states of the country. Most of the dairy farmers are smallholders having one or two local-breed milch animals, which are raised on crop residues and natural pastures with under-employed family labour. Feeding grains, oil cakes and green nutritious fodder are generally restricted to some crossbred cattle. The feed and fodder deficiencies, in fact, have been the main limiting factors in raising livestock productivity. Studies have indicated, for example, that a one percent increase in the digestibility of cereal straws increases milk yield in dairy cattle by 5-6 per cent (Baruah 2005).However, especially in India's poor eastern states, the growth of the rural population is still leading to decreasing farm sizes, while rising demand for milk and improving marketing opportunities stimulate continuous growth in dairy production. Thus, the availability of fodder is a serious issue, especially for resource-poor livestock keepers with little or no land for cultivation. The level of this constraint varies temporally and spatially, creating scope for storage and trade. It has been observed that farmers generally store a considerable proportion of their harvested fodder and that large amounts of fodder are traded, both locally and over longer distances. But the structure and functioning of those markets are poorly understood and opportunities for improving the efficiency of fodder marketing as a potential tool contributing to the alleviation of fodder scarcity have not been adequately explored. Fodder markets are particularly important for the poorest and landless sections of these communities, which have very limited ability to produce their own fodder, but need access to quality fodder at reasonable prices to be able to produce milk economically and at competitive cost. Fodder trading is also an important livelihood activity for the poor who engage in it directly or who are employed in this value chain. To assess the contribution of crop residues and compare market structures, the production, trade and consumption of concentrates was also considered in this study.A crucial aspect in regard to the supply of fodder which has been given little consideration to date is quality. It has been observed in other regions that fodder is differentiated by quality, resulting in significant price differences. In view of continuing intensification in dairy production, feed quality will play an increasingly central role. Even relatively small improvements of quality in the major feed components can enable significant productivity increases (Rai 2005). It has been shown in various crops that while nutritional quality of residues varies considerably between varieties, this variation is not correlated to grain yields. Thus, considering the nutritional quality of residues in crop improvement programmes would seem a very attractive pathway to increase the supply of better quality fodder. To assess the quality aspects of crop residues, it is necessary to first unravel the relationship between quality perceptions of farmers and traders and feed quality based on laboratory analysis.The overall objective of the study was to improve the livelihoods of resource-poor livestock producers by alleviating fodder scarcity. The specific objectives of the project were: Develop a systematic understanding of fodder markets and to what degree they recognize the nutritive value of fodder. Quantify the variation in nutritive value of different varieties/cultivars of feed-food crops in relation to market availability and perceptions.The study was conducted in Bihar state for the following reasons.It is amongst the poorest states in the region, and livestock is an important source of livelihood, enabling a direct poverty relevance of the study's findings. Its agricultural sector is diverse and thus also its production of crop residue based fodder. Both the share of cereals in the cropping pattern as well as the shares of individual cereals vary across districts within the state, which has implications for quantity and quality of fodder. Both wheat and rice straw are widely fed in this state located between rice oriented eastern and wheat focused north-western states. The demand for fodder is also determined by urban producers, both within the state-mainly around the capital Patna-and beyond its borders. A considerable export of fodder to Kolkata in West Bengal has been observed.The study was divided into three parts. A participatory rural appraisal (PRA) was conducted to identify the actors in the fodder market and get a preliminary picture of the market to facilitate the design of a detailed survey among the actors. Then a formal sample survey was conducted. Thirdly, fodder samples were collected and analyzed for quality. Detailed methodology and results for each component are presented below.Discussions with key informants indicated that there are five types of actors that are important in fodder markets in the state: producers, consumers, traders, feed millers and commission agents. Five semi-formal interviews were conducted with representatives of each of these types to draw an overall picture of fodder marketing in Bihar. PRAs were conducted in 4 districts, 2 in the surplus zone and 2 in the deficit zone. Then 12 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were organized at 12 sites in the state with the help of scientists of the Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Dairy Technology, Patna and the State Farmers' Commission, Bihar. At each site, some producers, assemblers, traders (vendors, retailers and wholesalers), and commission agents from fodder markets were assembled and discussions on different aspects of fodder marketing were held.Crop residues and by-products are the key components of livestock feed. Dry fodder constitutes the largest proportion of forage accounting for about 82% of the feed requirement. Straws of paddy and wheat together contribute to about 95% of dry fodders consumed by livestock in Bihar.The proportion of green fodder in total livestock feed is close to 10%. About 55% of green fodders are cultivated. Maize, sorghum, berseem, napier grass, and some of the legume species are mostly cultivated. The stovers of green maize and sorghum account for about 30% of the total green fodder, particularly in maize growing areas, and berseem and napier grass constitute 20% of the green fodder.Cut grasses, weeds and rogues are also important sources of green fodder-accounting for about 40% of the green fodder-and given to the livestock after chopping. In addition, leaves of some trees and banana trunk also supplement green fodder.The proportion of concentrate in the total feed is close to 8%. Oil cakes, choker (wheat bran and husks of pulses), darra (crushed grains) and chunni (broken and discarded pulses) are the most important concentrates. Manufactured compound feeds are also used to some extent. Oil cake, compound cattle feed and other concentrates account for 30, 25 and 45% of total consumption of concentrates, respectively. Due to alternative uses of many of the concentrate items, their use may decline in future.Every household that owns livestock stores fodder for future use. Storage practices differ according to types of feed items. Generally, paddy straw is stored in a corner of a courtyard in the open. The loose piles of paddy straw are stacked together. This type of storage is common in the areas where paddy is harvested by combine. The next important practice is storage of paddy straw in heaps/bundles arranged in a cylindrical shape covered by a conical shaped cap made of paddy straw/thatch in the fields or near the dwelling house. The conical shape of the cap prevents water from percolating inside the heap and the whole pile of straw remains unaffected except a thin layer on the top. Sometimes when the quantity is fairly small, paddy straw is also stored in the dwelling house.Chopped paddy and wheat straws are never stored lose in the open. Most of the time, these are stored in the dwelling houses of the producers or the users. Special bamboo storage structures (locally known as bukhari, bhuskar, etc.) are also built and used to store chopped paddy and wheat straws solely or along with food grains. Some affluent, big producers and traders have also constructed cemented structures to store fodder and grain.Fodder marketing in Bihar has no formal organized structure or formal institutional support. Paddy and wheat straws are the major traded fodders. Green fodder is also traded but its proportion is quite insignificant.Fodder marketing involves a number of actors along the supply chain. The most common fodder supply chain begins with the producers and proceeds further along a number of different channels with the help of various kinds of actors such as assemblers and small vendors, commission agents, retailers, wholesalers and processors, and ends with the ultimate users who are scattered across the state.There are five main actors or points of action in the wheat and rice straw supply chain: producer, trader-1 (vendor), trader-2 (wholesaler), trader-3 (retailer) and consumer. In between, there are other small actors such as bullock cart owners, assemblers, and commission agents who serve different principal agents to facilitate transactions. About 60% of the marketed surplus of straw is sold by producers to trader-1 and 3, 30% to trader-2 and 10% to consumers directly (Figure 2.1). There are many retailers who maintain good contacts with producers and purchase fodder directly from them. The longest supply chain involves the producer, trader-1, trader-2, commission agents, trader-3 and finally the ultimate consumers.Different types of means of transport are used to carry fodder from one place to another, depending on distance and purpose of transportation. Head loads are common for transportation of green fodder from the field to farms for self use. For localized fodder and concentrate trade (<10kms), mainly bullock carts are used. A bullock cart load of wheat straw fetches a price of Rs. 1200-1500 and roughly weighs 4 to 5 quintals 1 . A number of bullock carters (bail gadiwalas), particularly in fodder surplus zones, are involved in fodder trade. Tractor trolleys are also very important for fodder transportation along main highways for longer distances. Most of the inter-state and interregional trade is done by trucks.In the case of inter-state movement of fodder, some very interesting patterns have emerged. Patna, Jehanabad, Nalanda, Sheikhpura, Lakhisarai and Rohtas, which are the fodder surplus districts, are the main supply centres for dry fodder. Patna is the biggest transit point for fodder marketing. The state that buys the most fodder from Bihar is Jharkhand, which is highly deficient in fodder supply from its own production. Bihar also imports fodder from other states, notably from Uttar Pradesh for wheat straw sold directly in the fodder deficit regions of north Bihar.Information plays a critical role in fodder marketing. Different actors in the fodder market use different modes of communication to elicit information and contact their counterparts. Almost all fodder traders and agents own a cell phone, which helps them to contact buyers and sellers, especially when making contacts at a longer distance. However, face-to-face communication has not lost its significance. It is the next important mode, which is still popular among the petty traders in rural fodder markets.The process of price formation is simple. Farmers either accept the prevailing market price of fodder in the nearby region or negotiate with the purchasers using the prevailing local market price as a reference. Of course, exigency of demand and availability of fodder are considered while prices are negotiated. Deficit zones often witness extremes of flood devastation and face critical shortages of livestock feed as a consequence. Under such circumstances, demand for livestock feed rises many fold and hence price negotiations are driven by the exigency of demand. Otherwise, in normal situations price negotiation remains supply driven. However there are other considerations, too, that affect the fodder price. Certain quality aspects like good lustre, taste, cleanliness, softness, and moisture contents of fodder are considered when prices are determined. There are usually wide differences in fodder prices between the surplus and deficit zones with prices in deficit zones being 17 to 50% higher than those in surplus zones. At the time of the study, a quintal of paddy straw was selling at a price of Rs. 100 in the surplus zone compared to Rs. 150 in the deficit zone. The average price of wheat straw in the surplus zone was Rs. 200 per quintal whereas in the deficit zone it was Rs. 300. The price of cultivated green fodder is also usually determined on the basis of location. In surplus zones, a hectare of green fodder is sold for Rs. 15-25,000, whereas in deficit zones, it is sold for between Rs. 25-35,000. Cut grasses and green fodders are also sold in some of the areas at the rate of Rs. 1 to 1.5/kg. Both cash and credit sales are practiced in the livestock feed market: though cash sale is preferred, circumstances often force producers, sellers and their clients to facilitate fodder feed marketing on credit.Fodder and concentrate markets in Bihar face several constraints. Many of these constraints are generic in nature and presently are not being addressed.Storage difficulties and lack of appropriate storage facilities seriously affect year-round availability of fodder. Most of the marketable surplus of fodder is generated by marginal and small farmers who are in the majority in the state, but have limited storage capacity. Due to difficulties in fodder storage, they are forced to sell immediately after harvest. Even if stored, a large proportion of fodder gets spoiled or destroyed due to improper storage facilities.Transportation of fodder from producers to the market is fairly inefficient. Due to poor road conditions in rural areas and the absence of any block-making or baling technology, transportation and transaction costs are very high. It is estimated that marketing 100kg of fodder generates revenues of Rs. 395, of which the fodder raw material accounts for about 32% only and the rest is the marketing cost including transportation. The largest cost item is transportation which accounts for about 36%.Fodder is a bulky item, which makes its trading cumbersome and handling difficult. Some traders use compressing machines to make fodder blocks. This makes storage easy and transportation convenient, and so more cost effective. The majority of machines used for compressing fodder are obsolete. These machines, which were designed for the compression of jute in the jute factories during the colonial period, serve the purpose of traders and transporters to some extent, but are inefficient. There is a need to design and develop new economical and cost-effective machines to help the fodder sector. The Government of Bihar has planned to establish two plants for preparing feed blocks: one each in a fodder-deficit region (Samastipur) and in a feed-surplus region (Patna).Quality control of manufactured compound feed and concentrates is also essential. Most traders and consumers feel that there should be a mechanism to ensure quality of manufactured feed and nutritional supplements. Millers feel that prices of most raw materials are escalating day by day, and this compels a number of millers and manufacturers to go for cheaper substitutes or to use inferior material. They seek cost-effective and improved technology for manufactured feed. Public sector R&D can play an effective role in this regard, and can also be achieved through public-private partnership.Livestock is an integral part of the rural economy in Bihar and fodder is a critical input for livestock development. The data indicate that a huge gap exists between demand and supply of both dry and green fodder. Most of the south of Bihar comprising agro-climatic zones IIIA and IIIB are fodder surplus areas because of irrigated cultivation of paddy and wheat. Agro-climatic Zone I and Zone II are fodder deficit and mostly depend on fodder surplus regions for their requirements. Fodder production is seasonal, but demand is constant throughout the year or until the next crop season. Inadequate storage facilities and space sometimes force producers to dispose of much of their fodder rather than storing it for later use for their own needs or sale when prices are higher. To promote fodder production and trade, it is necessary to improve storage systems on-farm as well as en route to distant markets. Fodder markets are unorganized and informal and the role of the public sector/government is negligible. Most fodder markets occur without any dedicated market place, often along roadsides and without legal credentials. Having specific market places may facilitate flow of market information, increase interaction among buyers and sellers and facilitate transparency and competition leading to fairer prices.Fodder is a bulky item, which makes its trading cumbersome and handling difficult. Some traders use compressing machines to make fodder blocks. It is important to develop cost-effective and efficient fodder compressing technology to ease handling and transportation as well as generate cost savings. Quality control of manufactured compound feed and concentrates is also essential. Most of the traders and consumers feel that there should be a mechanism to ensure quality of manufactured feed and nutritional supplements. Development of technology for cost-effective and nutritive feed requires urgent attention and here public sector R&D can play an effective role. This can also be done in public-private partnership mode.The PRA showed that there exists a huge gap between demand and supply of fodder (both dry as well as green). Most of south Bihar comprising agro-climatic zones IIIA and IIIB are fodder surplus because of cultivation of paddy and wheat under assured irrigation facilities. Agro-climatic zones I and II are fodder deficit and mostly depend on fodder surplus regions for their requirements. The PRA also identified various types of actors in the fodder and concentrate markets. In order to understand in more detail how fodder markets actually work and perform, a detailed survey was conducted among representative market actors so that more specific constraints in the market could be identified for possible interventions (technical, institutional and policy) for improving its performance.Two contrasting zones, namely deficit and surplus, were identified and four districts from each zone were selected for detailed study using a multistage stratified random sampling method (Figure 3.1).Bihar is divided into four agro-climatic zones. For the present study, we classified these agro-climatic zones into two groups based on fodder production status, i.e. surplus and deficit. Using a stratified sampling approach, four districts were randomly selected from each of the surplus and deficit groups. The selected districts from each group were: Bhabhua, Patna, Jamui and Bhagalpur from the surplus zone; and East-Champaran, Sitamarhi, Purnea and Khagaria from the deficit zone. From each district, two tehsils (administrative sub-unit) were then randomly selected. Within each tehsil, two villages were next randomly selected. The Government of India Village Census (2001) has been used as the sampling frame for selecting administrative sub-units and villages. From each village, 15 farm households were selected using a randomizing village walk approach. Thus, a total of 480 farm households were surveyed. In addition, other actors of the feed marketing chain were sampled from each district: fodder traders (10), concentrate traders (5), concentrate millers (5) and urban-dairy consumers (10). The total survey sample thus included: 476 fodder producers, 80 fodder traders, 80 fodder consumers, 40 concentrate traders and 40 concentrate millers. Separate questionnaires were prepared and pre-tested for each group.After the survey, each type of actor was classified into sub-categories based on their functions and marketing behaviour.The fodder producers were stratified into three categories depending on their selling and/or buying status: net sellers (140), net buyers ( 221), and autarkic (113). Traders were stratified depending on the nature of their business into vendors (27), wholesalers (4), and retailers (49). Consumers were stratified into three categories; urban commercial dairy producers (80), rural commercial dairy producers (73) and other rural farmers (401).Residues of the principal crops, namely paddy, wheat, maize and pulses, are the main sources of dry fodder in Bihar. These crops constitute about 90% of dry fodder produced in the surveyed villages. Maize is not an important source of fodder in the surplus zone. Production of dry fodder is closely related to the size of land holdings; in both the zones, net sellers had larger land holdings and produced more dry fodder than net buyers.Rice-wheat cropping systems were common in the surplus zone and these two crops constituted more than 90% of dry fodder production, whereas in the fodder deficit zone these two crops constituted 78 percent of total dry fodder production in surveyed villages. Pulses were the third most important dry fodder-producing crop in the surplus zone, whereas maize was the third most important in the deficit zone due to adoption of winter maize over large areas. Average production of dry fodder per household in the surveyed villages in the surplus zone was about twice that in the deficit zone, mainly due to the larger land holdings found there. The proportion of area used for production of the main dry fodder-producing crops (rice and wheat) was higher in the fodder surplus zone (75%) than in the fodder deficit zone (68%). The recent decline in area under rice and the use of combine harvesters in rice and wheat crops, particularly in the fodder surplus zone, could present a threat to fodder availability in Bihar. Retrieving straw from the field after combine harvesting is more costly and reduces the quality compared to manual harvesting, where cereal bundles are carried from the field for threshing.Inter-zone, intra-zone and inter-state dry fodder marketing are all common in Bihar. The amount of dry fodder sold was higher (5.5 tonnes (t)/household) in the surplus zone than in the deficit zone (3.8 t/household). As discussed earlier, paddy straw was the most important dry fodder accounting for 67% of sale volume; its share was higher in the surplus zone: about 72%. Wheat straw was the second important dry fodder with respect to production and marketing.Despite much higher production of wheat straw in the surplus zone, farmer preference there for feeding their animals with wheat straw rather than paddy straw translated into a smaller share of their wheat straw sold (39%) compared to the deficit zone (57%), with the quantities sold per household being almost identical in both zones. There is no market for maize stover in the surplus zone due to the negligible area under maize there. Livestock keepers in the surplus zone are not even aware that maize stover can be used as fodder. Marketing of pulse straw is not a common practice and less than one quintal was sold per household in the surveyed villages. About 20% of output in the surveyed villages in the surplus zone and 11% in the deficit zone was sold. Per household sale of pulse straw was higher in the surplus zone (0.15 t) than in the deficit zone (0.03 t), reflecting a larger area under pulses in the surplus zone.Among the major dry fodders in the surplus zone, pulse fodder is the most expensive (Rs. 1.94/kg) due to the higher preference given to it, followed by wheat straw (Rs. 1.17/kg) and paddy straw (Rs 1.07/kg). On the other hand, wheat straw was sold at a higher price (Rs. 1.33/kg) in the deficit zone, followed by paddy straw (Rs. 1.30/kg) and pulse straw, which was sold at much lower price (Rs. 1.14/kg). It is noteworthy that pulse straw fetched the highest price in the surplus zone whereas wheat straw is the most expensive in the deficit zone. Price behaviour of different types of fodder is influenced by farmer preferences in each zone. As expected, the prices of the main fodders (paddy and wheat straw) were higher in the deficit zone than in the surplus zone.The price of fodder was linked to type of purchaser. In the deficit zone, 51% of fodder sold by farmers was sold to fellow farmers in the village for higher prices than to other buyers. In the surplus zone, farmers sold more than 70 percent of fodder to vendors for lower prices. In the surplus zone, selling to vendors was preferred because they purchased almost all the surplus fodder at the same time. Wholesalers and dairy producers did not buy much fodder directly from producer farmers in either zone. However, farmers sold 6 to 8% of fodder to retailers in the surveyed villages. In both zones, almost all sales of fodder by farmers took place in the village, as it was difficult for farmers to transport their fodder to a market.An attempt was made to assess farmer perceptions of fodder quality. From a list of attributes, chopped short-length straw was the most desired for all the main fodders (paddy, wheat and pulses). Bright colour was the second important attribute for wheat straw but it was the fourth important attribute for paddy and pulse straws. Purity of fodder-that is, being free from contamination with other fodder species or varieties-emerged as the second most important attribute for pulse straw and third important for wheat and paddy straw. Farmers did not consider variety as an important attribute. Hence, short length, bright colour and purity are the important quality attributes. Taste was the least important attribute. Even when choosing cereal varieties to grow for human consumption, farmers do not consider taste: important criteria for selection of rice varieties in Bihar, for example, are yield and duration of crop (Singh, Thakur and Thelma, 2000).Feed millers produce small quantities of concentrates. Average annual concentrate production was about 87.4 t per miller in the surplus zone, whereas in the deficit zone, each miller produced only 15.2 t per year on average. Mustard and oil seed cake were the major concentrates and jointly constituted 53% of concentrate produced by feed millers, whereas maize-based feed was the third important feed (27%) produced by these millers.Millers produced small quantities of choker (husks of wheat grain) and darra (crushed grains) from food grains. Raw materials purchased by concentrate millers can be grouped into two categories: those exclusively for feed production (e.g. maize, barley and pulses and those for dual purpose feed and food (e.g. wheat, mustard and linseed). Wheat is used for production of flour, chokar and darra whereas mustard and linseed are used for production of oils and cakes (feed). Raw materials for feed production appeared to be readily available to millers since they bought more than two-thirds of their requirements at their business premises, mainly supplied by farmers and vendors. The other third was bought from wholesalers, indicating an important role of wholesalers in the supply of raw materials to feed millers in Bihar. Small feed millers had, on an average, a turnover of about Rs. 1.4 million, with oil cake accounting for about 58 percent of total business. The price of concentrates varied from Rs. 18.54/kg for linseed cake to Rs 8.17 for maize darra. Among darra, that from pulses was the most expensive (Rs. 14.04/kg).Concentrate millers sold all their output at their business premises. They sold about 65 percent directly to consumers (farmers and dairy producers) with retailers as the second most important buyers. Thus concentrates produced by unorganized millers do not pass through long marketing channels with different intermediaries such as vendor and wholesalers.Sales of concentrate (mainly crushed milled grains) were higher in summer season when green fodder is in short supply and availability of raw material is higher because it is just after harvesting of rabi crops. Sales are lower in autumn season due to an abundance of green fodders, including cut grasses.The market for dry and green fodders in Bihar is extremely underdeveloped and highly informal. However, there is a distinct pattern of fodder marketing between the fodder surplus and deficit zones. In fodder surplus zones, the main traded fodder is paddy straw. In these zones, an average trader buys 143 t of dry fodder per year, of which about 136 t (95%) is paddy straw.The scenario, however, is quite different in the fodder deficit zones. Paddy straw as a fodder is least preferred and is only fed to livestock when farmers do not have any alternative. About 89% of the dry fodder traded in deficit zones was wheat straw because it is supposed to be more palatable and nutritious. It also appeared that 53% of traded fodder passes through wholesalers in the deficit zone compared to 30% in the surplus zone.The role of retail traders in fodder marketing appeared to be quite significant and critical. On average, retail fodder traders buy and sell more fodder than an average wholesaler. About 42% of the fodder being traded passed through retailers. Retail traders purchased about 118 t of dry fodder per annum, maintaining about 10% of that as running stock.The function of vendors was also important. They normally collect or buy small quantities of fodder from producers and sell it in nearby markets to dairy producers, semi-processors, wholesalers and retailers. In urban areas, they also buy fodder from retail traders. Vendors usually prefer to dispose off their fodder stock the same day.About one quarter of the vendors, one third of the retailers and half of the wholesalers in Bihar store fodder. It is a common practice for traders to purchase fodder from producers, but to not take delivery of the entire lot at once. Instead, they store fodder in the farmers' yards and take delivery of it gradually as and when required. A small proportion of the fodder purchased is also stored at the business premises or houses of the traders.As far as processing is concerned, about 41% of traders processed fodder in some way, with different forms of processing characterizing the deficit and surplus zones. Traders in the deficit zone did little processing. Some retailers (9%) did go for light processing like chopping of maize stover, etc., but in general fodder was sold without any additional processing. It is important to recall that wheat straw is the main marketed fodder in the deficit zone and it is automatically chopped into small pieces during harvesting by the threshers using combine harvesters or specially designed threshers. In contrast, paddy straw, which dominates the fodder markets in the surplus zone, is harvested and threshed manually by beating or hitting the small bundles (antia) of paddy. Therefore, paddy straw must still be chopped into small pieces before feeding. Chopped paddy straw fetches a higher price and hence almost all retailers and wholesalers chopped paddy straw before selling. Many vendors (42%) in the surplus zone also chopped paddy straw before selling it. No other forms of processing such as preparation of silage, fodder bricks, urea treatment, etc. were reported.Certain quality parameters are important in fodder trade. Although there are no hard and fast rules, there are a number of parameters that traders report keeping in mind. Colour, size, moisture, softness, purity, cleanliness and variety are some of the parameters which are taken into account during negotiation and price determination. Sensory methods are mainly used to assess these quality attributes. The majority of traders take account of colour before buying. Usually, fodder having uniform colour and bright lustre is preferred. Most traders (78%) reported that a natural colour of fodder was the prime consideration when buying with length/size of the fodder being the next important consideration. For wheat straw and chopped paddy straw, traders preferred finely chopped small pieces because consumers also prefer chopped straw. Purity--defined as fodder not being mixed with other fodder species or varieties-also was important. These quality parameters are considered because consumers also accord highest priority to them. About 93% of consumers bought fodder after observing the colour. Purity of fodder was also important and 6% of traders stated that they tried to convince buyers about the purity and cleanliness of the fodder while selling.Fodder prices appear to be highly volatile, probably because of variation in demand and supply in the state. Frequent droughts and floods or the combination (drought followed by the flood) are regular features in many parts of the state and greatly affect production and availability of fodder which ultimately governs price. Besides year-to-year variation in fodder prices, intra year price differential is also common. Table 3.1 presents the maximum and minimum prices of fodder for the three years since 2006. It is obvious that based on these trends, projecting future prices is extremely difficult. In Bihar, feed companies and millers are the largest sellers of concentrates. In the deficit and surplus zones, about 66 and 43%, respectively, of concentrates are purchased by traders from feed companies and millers. Concentrate traders supply these to farmers and dairy producers and in some cases to other concentrate traders.Wholesalers are other important players, selling 42% in the surplus zone and 28% in the deficit zone directly to other concentrate traders. Some farmers are also involved in concentrate trading, accounting for about 4% of concentrates traded. In the surplus zone, vendors sold about 11 percent of concentrates to concentrate traders, mostly degraded grains, pulses etc. for resale as feed concentrates. In contrast, in the deficit zone, vendors did not play any role in concentrate marketing.About 69% of concentrates purchased by concentrate traders in the surplus zone was purchased on credit as compared to only 2% in the deficit zone. Cash purchases accounted for 28% in the deficit zone and another 32% was obtained by making partial payment in cash and the rest on credit. Interestingly, 39% of concentrate was purchased by making payment in advance in the deficit zone. Thus the supply-demand scenario appears to have a big influence on the mode of transaction financing.Oilseed cakes, small broken pieces of pulses (chunni), crushed grains (darra), other coarse grains, manufactured compound animal feed, and seeds of leguminous weed (locally known as akta misiya)were the principal concentrates reported sold and purchased in Bihar (Table 3.2). During autumn, sales of concentrates are at their lowest level, while in winter they are highest (mainly oilseed cakes and compound feed). Autumn is the lean season for dairy production when a majority of dairy animals become dry and thus producers only provide them maintenance levels of feeding. The energy requirement of animals increases in winter, increasing the demand for concentrates. Livestock holdings can be broadly categorized into three groups; urban commercial dairy, rural commercial dairy and rural smallholder dairy. They are the main buyers of fodder, with their demand for fodder varying according to the number of animals owned. Commercial dairies in urban and rural areas of the deficit zone had larger herds compared to their counterparts in the surplus zone, although the proportion of dry animals was larger in the deficit zone. Urban commercial dairies in both zones had similar proportions of crossbred cattle in their herds, but the proportion of buffalo was higher in the surplus zone. In both zones, the herd size in rural dairy farms was small with about 50% of the animals being dry (Table 3.3).All categories of dairy farms in the surplus zone and urban commercial dairy farms in the deficit zone used paddy and wheat straw as the principal dry fodder. Pulse straw constituted less than 5% of total dry fodder used by dairy farms in the surplus zone and less than 2% on rural dairy farms in the deficit zone. Since the deficit zone is a maize growing area, rural commercial dairy farms there used a substantial quantity of maize stover. All maize stover in the deficit zone was not used as fodder because a substantial quantity was used either as fuel, particularly by poor households, or burned in the field. Berseem, green oats, cut grass and maize are the main green fodders in Bihar, with berseem being the main green fodder in the surplus zone and maize in the deficit zone. Agriculture in the surplus zone is more developed and has improved irrigation infrastructure for production of berseem. Maize is an important crop in the deficit zone and it is one of the important green fodders. Cut grass was an important green fodder on rural commercial dairy units in both zones, mainly due to easy access. Oats was also used as fodder, particularly in the deficit zone but not in the surplus zone. In the deficit zone, oats are grown as a green fodder crop prior to growing early summer vegetables. Bamboo leaves are also fed as green fodder in the deficit zone.Rural commercial dairy units in both zones mainly buy fodder directly from farmers. Urban commercial dairy units in the surplus zone buy fodder mainly from retailers (43%) and vendors (29%). In the deficit zone, vendors are also important suppliers of fodder (49%) for urban commercial units which also purchased fodder from farmers (41%). Wholesalers were not an important source of fodder for commercial dairy units; they operate as middlemen in the fodder marketing chain.It is worth pointing out that urban commercial dairy units in the deficit zone bought about twice the quantity of concentrate (3.3 kg/Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) /day) than their counterparts in the surplus zone (1.6 kg/TLU/day). Rural commercial dairy units and rural smallholder dairy farms in the deficit zone also bought less concentrate than urban commercial dairy units in the zone, but more than their counterparts in the surplus zone. The higher use of concentrate by all categories of dairy units in the deficit zone may reflect the scarcity of green fodder.There was a small difference in the price of major concentrates purchased by different categories of dairy units. In the surplus zone, urban dairy units paid higher prices for concentrates than rural commercial dairy units and rural smallholder dairy farms.Feed consumers combined individual feeds to make various rations. The resulting consumption patterns differed considerably between consumer types. About 5.6 kg dry fodder, 0.3 kg green fodder and 2.7 kg concentrates were used per day per TLU by urban commercial dairy producers, whereas rural commercial dairy producers fed 5.0, 1.0 and 0.7 kg and rural farmers fed 6.0, 1.1 and 0.5 kg of dry fodder, green fodder and concentrates per day per TLU (Table 3.4). Among different types of concentrates used on surveyed dairy units, oil cakes, choker-chunni-husks, and milled grains constituted more than four-fifths of total concentrates consumed in both zones. Compound feed was more popular in the surplus zone, but urban commercial units in the deficit zone also used more compound feed (0.6 kg) for milk production than their counterparts in the surplus zone (0.1 kg). Feeding a mineral mixture was not common. In the surplus zone, urban commercial dairy units used comparatively large quantities of \"chokerchunni-husk\" followed by milled grains, oil cakes and compound feed, whereas rural commercial dairy units used more milled grains followed by compound feed, choker-chunni-husk and oil cakes.Rural smallholder dairy farms had different patterns of concentrate feeding; on these units, more oil cake was used followed by milled grains, choker-chunni-husks and compound feed. In the deficit zone also, there was inter-category variations in concentrate feeding patterns, but the seasonal pattern was identical for all categories of dairy units.State government intervention in fodder production and marketing is non-existent in Bihar. However, the government arranges to supply dry fodder and provides transportation support during floods. Fodder production and marketing does not feature in the 'Road Map for Agriculture and Allied Sectors' by the Government of Bihar, nor does fodder marketing feature in any dairy development programmes in the state. The main issues that emerge from the study are:1. There is no specified place for fodder marketing, hence, a market place for fodder could be arranged by the government in existing market yards where sufficient unutilized space is available for this purpose.2. Within villages, more than 80% of trade in fodder is direct to consumers and the price of fodder is high in the deficit zone.3. Seasonal price fluctuations reflect the lack of storage capacity at producer, trader and consumer levels.4. Urban dairy producers are major buyers of fodder; they buy about 73% of dry fodder sold by traders.5. The type of fodder used also depends on the intensity of production: with increasing intensification of dairy production, the share of wheat straw being fed to dairy animals increases.Product definition and differentiation is an important aspect in most studies of markets. However, in the case of the few previous studies of straw markets, the level of detail paid to product definition and quality is generally limited. In most reports, straw is only defined by crop species and, in a few cases, variety groups are considered where differences within a crop are especially strong, for instance within rice.However, it is known that the nutritional quality of cereal straw varies greatly within crops as well as between crops. A considerable part of this variation is genetically based. This raises several questions:What is the actual variation in nutritional quality found at various stages of the straw marketing chain? How is the variation in quality perceived by consumers and traders of straw? How far do consumers and traders differentiate between environmental (e.g. management related) and genetic (e.g. varietal) effects on quality of straw? How is this knowledge carried along the marketing chain? What does this mean for improvement strategies, both through management and breeding approaches?Thus, the component on quality of straw throughout the marketing chain was designed as an integral part of the study. An important aspect regarding the evaluation of quality is the link between prices and various quality attributes. Information on prices and quality was collected from large urban markets to investigate price determinants. In these markets, large quantities of straw are traded by specialised traders who have often been involved in the trade for many years. Thus, it is assumed that prices here are less volatile than in smaller markets and that the traders have acquired a substantial amount of knowledge.To answer the questions raised above, the following data were collected: perceptions of traders on straw quality and its components prices nutritional quality determined by laboratory analysisIn addition, data on market structure and linkages were collected to enable links to the other components of the study. Because another project was also working on issues of straw marketing at New Delhi and Kolkata, it was possible to conduct the same data collection routine at all three sites ( Figure 4.1), allowing for insights into possible site effects on prices and quality perceptions.In Bihar, both wheat and rice straw is widely fed and is therefore also traded in Patna. In New Delhi, only wheat straw is traded, while in Kolkata, only rice straw is found in fodder markets. This report will focus on the findings in Patna, but for comparison some results from New Delhi and Kolkata are also shown. The aim was to collect data from specialised fodder traders on specific straw qualities, the main unit of analysis, at monthly intervals over the course of 13 months. Thus, 12 wheat straw samples and 12 rice straw samples were collected in Patna monthly over 13 months. Concurrently, 12 monthly samples over 13 months were collected in New Delhi (wheat straw) and Kolkata (rice straw). The sampling included completion of a one-page questionnaire for each sample which recorded quality perceptions, price and market chain information (Figure 4.2).The major sampling step involved selecting the fodder traders from which the straw samples were then collected. They were selected following these criteria:Traders were well established to ensure that they would be trading for the coming year (Figure 4.3) Fodder traders were located in at least two fodder markets per site to control for a market effect. At least three traders from each market were included. If possible, traders were offering more than one quality throughout the year. If possible, traders from Patna were trading both wheat and rice straw. When trading rice straw, it should be offered as chopped straw to customers, even though it is often transported unchopped (Figure 4.4)Where a trader was selling more than two feed-grade qualities, only the highest and lowest priced qualities were sampled. However, most traders were only trading one quality and only one straw type. Thus, a considerable number of traders were selected from each site. Table 4.1 shows the location of the selected traders at the Patna site. In addition to the data collected for each sample, information on the traders was collected during two visits, to allow for control of trader characteristics (Figure 4.4). Finally, traders were asked to grade three common samples to enable the comparison of trader perceptions. During each sampling visit, the selected straw traders were asked to evaluate the quality of each sample according to six characteristics which had previously been identified as the most important: shortness of particles, softness, purity, brightness, dryness and taste. In addition, rice straw, which was delivered to traders unchopped, was also evaluated by the criteria of length, thinness and brightness of colour at base. Finally, an overall assessment of the quality was recorded. Traders were asked to assign index values ranging from 1 (e.g. best, shortest, brightest …) to 5 (e.g. poorest, longest, least bright …).In order to increase the accuracy of the laboratory results, four replicates were collected for each sample. At the ILRI facility in Hyderabad, these samples were first dried and weighed to determine the dry-matter content. They were then ground through a 1mm sieve and subjected to Near Infrared Spectrometry (NIRS) which uses near-infrared light rays and records the absorption/reflection spectrum. The resulting data were processed with regression equations which had been calibrated during previous studies by conventional laboratory methods.The following variables were generated for characterising nutritional quality: ash content For investigating links between variable groups, ordinary least squares regression was employed. In the case of the price determinants, variables were first screened by an ANOVA in order to avoid flooding the regression model with insignificant variables. A squared month term was introduced to account for the assumed cyclical pattern of seasonal effects.This section focuses on the results of the quality perceptions, the nutritional analysis and prices. All three variable groups show considerable seasonal variation. Therefore, descriptive means are presented over the course of the data collection period. In order to better understand links between variables, the results of simple regression analyses are also presented.Table 4.2 shows the seasonal variation of the overall assessment as well as the results for shortness, brightness and softness. These variables are generally regarded as most important by the traders. In order to test for the consistency of evaluation, the effect of the quality traits on the overall quality perception is estimated through a regression analysis. The resulting coefficients are shown in Table 4.3. Of the nine variables determined by the NIRS procedure to characterise the nutritional quality of the collected straw samples, only the results of the three most indicative variables are presented here. Digestibility is often the first major constraint in feed quality, nitrogen content indicates the proportion of leafy material and metabolisable energy is often the most limiting constraint from a feeding perspective. The seasonal variation of these variables is presented in Table 4.4. Sale prices collected from the straw traders during the data collection period are listed in Table 4.5. Although actual prices often include delivery and some credit arrangement as additional services by the trader to the customer, the prices listed here include neither. For comparison, the prices from New Delhi and Kolkata are included in addition to those from Patna. 3.13 3.23 3.25 3.27 3.44 3.21 3.35 3.02 3.13 2.98 3.30 3.29 3.42 Data source: 12 samples for each month from each site and typeIn order to better understand the links between quality perceptions, market prices and nutritional quality, various regression analyses were performed. Only selected results are presented here. Table 4.6 shows the effects of all perceived quality traits on the dependent variable \"price\". The low r 2 value in the case of wheat indicates how little of the price variation can be explained by the perceived quality traits. On the other hand, some traits, especially \"thinness (whole)\" and \"purity\" appear to contribute to higher prices. It should be investigated further why \"brightness\" and \"dryness\" show a positive sign, indicating poorer quality for these attributes correlates with higher prices. Subsequently, the links between the perceived quality traits and nutritional quality were investigated. However, it is not possible to determine effects of the perceived quality traits on digestibility through this regression analysis. The regression model for wheat straw only shows a significance level of 0.248, while the regression model for rice straw is significant but only exhibits an adjusted R 2 of 0.030.Similarly, regression results do not indicate any effects of perceived traits on metabolisable energy content. For wheat straw the model significance is 0.572, while for rice straw the model is once again significant but the adjusted R 2 is only 0.140. The single coefficient with a reasonable significance is \"dryness\".Finally, both quality traits and nutritional variables are included in a regression analysis together with environmental variables to investigate price determinants. The resulting coefficients are shown in Table 4.7. The overall design of the study proved to be effective in collecting and analysing the desired data. The traders were happy to co-operate and the information provided seemed sufficiently consistent. One lesson that emerged was the need to accurately define prices as traders varied in the extent of additional services they routinely provided.During data collection, it was observed that traders did not use a wide range of index values to evaluate their straw. The values generally varied between 1 and 3, which is also apparent in the low standard deviations shown in Table 4.2. In addition, as most traders only traded in one quality, the trader effect in the evaluation procedure was fairly large. In fact, some traders who were generally selling cheaper straw were often insistent on giving their straw high marks (\"I sell only the best quality!\"). Thus, in future studies such evaluations might be performed by an external person in order to avoid such a bias. For testing the trader effect, traders were asked to evaluate three standard samples. The data of this exercise are not yet analysed.The results of the quality perceptions show some variation through the seasons, but this is not easy to interpret. For instance, the overall quality of wheat straw is generally perceived to be the highest in August, four months after harvest and at the height of the monsoon season. Generally, high levels of humidity lead to a deterioration of straw quality. Also, the value levels do not differ greatly between the variables.Nevertheless, the regression of overall quality by the quality traits shows a useful explanatory power. In wheat, shortness and brightness show the greatest contribution while tastiness and softness are also significant, albeit with lower coefficient values. In rice, tastiness even shows the greatest contribution while colour, for both chopped and unchopped straw, is also important.Tastiness is somewhat difficult to define and quantify. On the other hand, the colour of straw is probably influenced considerably by fungus infestation, which occurs especially in humid periods.The type of quality variables also indicates that for consumers and traders, straw quality is foremost determined by various processing and management characteristics. For instance, shortness and softness is mainly influenced by the type of thresher employed. On the other hand, colour, dryness and purity are probably controlled largely by storage and transport. So far, intervention approaches have been mainly aimed at genetic improvements through varietal selection for superior nutritional quality, based on the fact that existing varieties show a wide variation in these characteristics. However, in the studied urban markets, traders were never aware of the varietal origin of their straw. They were, however, aware of differences in nutritional quality of varieties.The results of the nutritional analysis show a fairly consistent picture. Only the first month (June 2008) appears to be an outlier with relatively low values for wheat and high values for rice. It is noteworthy that the digestibility values for rice are generally lower than the average of all rice varieties previously tested, which was above 40%. It would be interesting to investigate this further to determine whether this is caused by variety choice, agronomic practices or post-harvest characteristics. In general, straw quality was highest around harvest time (March/April for wheat and November/December for rice). However, digestibility in rice appears to be highest six months after the harvest.The results of price recording indicate that seasonal factors alone do not determine prices. For instance, although wheat straw in Patna is cheapest after harvest in April, the peak price is found in August 2008. In New Delhi, prices in 2009 appear to be considerably higher than in 2008. And rice straw in Patna is cheapest in April/May, four months after harvest. Also, the difference in prices between sites is greater than between straw types within Patna. In fact, wheat and rice straw prices in Patna appear to move in parallel, with their peak in August (wheat) / July (rice) and their lowest values in April. This indicates a fair degree of substitutability, which is consistent with reports from the data collection. It would be interesting to investigate how the comparative evaluation of wheat and rice straw in Patna differs between various types of consumers.The various regression analyses regarding straw prices confirm the earlier indication of complex relationships existing between variables. Neither quality traits nor nutritional quality variables alone can explain straw prices. The only exception might be the quality traits of rice straw with close to 30% explanatory power, where \"thinness of the whole straw\" provides a large and significant contribution to price variation while having the expected negative sign. The lower index values indicate a higher quality. On the other hand \"brightness\" and \"softness\", two other significant coefficients, exhibit positive signs, contrary to expectations.The most obvious conclusion from the price determinant regression is the overriding influence of \"city\". As straw has rather high transportation costs and supply often differs between these rather distant sites (distance Delhi-Patna 1029 km, Patna-Kolkata 614 km), the studied markets are fairly isolated from each other. Therefore, it might be reasonable to analyse the three markets separately. However, a greater number of samples per site would be required to enable separate statistical analyses. On the other hand, because of their apparent substitutability, rice and wheat straw markets in Patna might be analysed together.The time variables appear to be significant only in the case of rice straw. There is some indication of a cyclical seasonality and a year effect. On the other hand, in wheat, despite the considerable price increases in Delhi in 2009, no year effect can be determined by the regression as prices in Patna decreased. Prices in Kolkata did not vary that much. However, as the study only covered thirteen months, a year effect cannot be accurately determined. Additional data on supply and demand to augment the analysis of price variation might contribute explanatory power.As in the trait regression, \"thinness of the whole straw\" appears to have a strong effect on rice straw prices. This indicates a varietal preference which should be further explored.The study has provided valuable new insights into qualities, perceptions and valuations of wheat and rice straw in urban fodder markets. It has been shown that traders mainly perceive straw quality by post-harvest characteristics. According to the analysis performed so far, these do not seem to have close links to the nutritional quality determined by laboratory methods. The nutritional values found were roughly in line with expectations for wheat but lower than expected for rice. The study showed that the selected markets differed so strongly in their price dynamics that they cannot easily be analysed together. The differences between markets and over time overshadowed variation which could be explained by quality.Fodder producers usually feed animals chopped or unchopped straw depending on local practice as well as availability of labour. However, retail fodder traders usually need to chop straw before selling, especially to urban/peri-urban livestock producers because buyers want ease of transportation and less space for storage. Utilization of chopped straw is also more efficient than unchopped straw. Simple, good-quality choppers are rarely found in local markets, but prototypes may be available elsewhere. Therefore, adaptation and dissemination of small-scale manual or mechanical choppers also offer an opportunity for improving feed marketing and its better utilization.However, even small choppers may be unsuitable for many small-scale fodder producers and fodder traders as they may not be able to use them to their full capacity. Larger traders may be able to own and use them to capacity on their own. One solution may be promoting fodder processing services: the equipment could be individually owned and custom-hired for a fee to others to make full use of the capacity. In the case of farmer groups or cooperatives, the ownership could be held by the group or the cooperative and its use shared for a fee by members. Financial institutions-banks and NGOscould facilitate acquisition and efficient use of these types of equipment by offering subsidized credit to individuals and groups. The financial institutions could develop a simple business plan showing cost and income flows, rates of return and payback periods so that the credit is granted on a sound financial basis that is easily understandable by the equipment owner.Prices of dry fodder could also be included in market information systems, being broadcast by radio and TV like other agricultural commodities; newspapers can also publish the prices of dry and green fodder targeting the large number of people involved in fodder production and marketing. Institutional credit could be made available to fodder traders so that they may also conduct business like any other enterprise related to the agricultural sector in the state. Research and extension programmes should be initiated for fodder production. Training of farmers can be organized for fodder production, processing, storage and marketing to prevent spoilage and to make better and judicious use of available feed and fodder being produced in Bihar.The nutritional quality survey results provide valuable new insights into issues related to fodder attributes, perceptions of these attributes and valuations of wheat and rice straw in urban fodder markets. It has been shown that traders mainly perceive straw quality by post-harvest characteristics. According to the analysis performed so far, these do not seem to have close links to the nutritional quality as determined by laboratory methods. The nutritional values found were roughly in line with expectations for wheat but lower than expected for rice. The study showed that the studied markets differed so strongly in their price dynamics that they cannot easily be analysed together. The differences between markets and over time overshadowed variation which could be explained by quality."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1687963628.json b/main/part_2/1687963628.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b86435d648421c62d0246913b4a5263c10223a6f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1687963628.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"89bcb41168b2e560576715dd05d71c5c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/37525389-5a45-436c-abcf-edbaa0f3823d/retrieve","id":"-179815009"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f08b4642-823f-4246-84a6-69f1c453b02d","content":"La biodiversidad agrícola y la erradicación del hambre y la pobreza, cinco años después Plataforma de Chennai para la AcciónEste folleto presenta la 'Plataforma de Chennai para la Acción' para mejorar la contribución que hacen los recursos fi togenéticos para el cumplimiento de los Objetivos de Desarrollo para el Milenio (ODM), especialmente para reducir el hambre y la pobreza.El plan de acción fue elaborado por los participantes en una consulta internacional sobre 'Función de la Agrobiodiversidad en el Logro del Objetivo de Desarrollo para el Milenio de Erradicar el Hambre y la Pobreza', celebrada en Chennai, India, en abril de 2005. La Consulta, organizada por el Instituto Internacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos (IPGRI), la Unidad de Facilitación Global para Especies Sub-utilizadas (GFU) del Foro Mundial sobre la Investigación Agrícola (GFAR) y la Fundación M.S. Swaminathan para la Investigación (MSSRF), reunió a unos 100 expertos y gestores de políticas con antecedentes variados de 25 países de todo el mundo para formular enfoques que permitieran maximizar la contribución que hace la agrobiodiversidad a la reducción del hambre y de la pobreza.Los participantes resaltaron la contribución distintiva que hace la agrobiodiversidad para mejorar los medios de vida al sentar las bases para la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional en los hogares y al ofrecer oportunidades para la generación de ingresos. También discutieron políticas, limitaciones institucionales y otros aspectos que limitan el despliegue total de estos recursos naturales y, en consecuencia, obstaculizan el logro de los OMD. También expresaron su preocupación por la rápida pérdida de estos recursos, que amenaza seriamente la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional de generaciones futuras. La intención de los participantes no sólo fue hacer que los gestores de políticas a nivel mundial y la comunidad internacional fueran más conscientes de la función que ejerce la agrobiodiversidad en la lucha contra el hambre, la pobreza y la desnutrición, sino también buscar mayor compromiso internacional con la conservación y el uso de este recurso natural para lograr el primero de los OMD.El plan de acción descrito en este folleto tiene por objetivo ayudar a los gobiernos nacionales y a los organismos internacionales a alcanzar la meta de reducir a la mitad el hambre y la pobreza para 2015. Promueve los principios de asignarle más importancia a la agrobiodiversidad en las estrategias de desarrollo nacionales e internacionales y de crear las condiciones políticas necesarias para permitir el uso sostenible de este tesoro para el benefi cio de los miembros más pobres y marginados de nuestra sociedad. El plan de acción requiere de mayor colaboración internacional en la conservación y la participación sostenible y equitativa de los benefi cios que surgen del uso de la agrobiodiversidad. Destaca la necesidad urgente de acción, de maneras apropiadas para cada país, para cumplir con los OMD.Los participantes de la sesión expresaron su preocupación por el hecho de que, cinco años después de la aprobación de los OMD, han sido muy pocos los avances logrados en la erradicación del hambre y la pobreza. En algunos países, la situación hasta ha empeorado. La sesión estuvo de acuerdo en hacer todos los esfuerzos para traer las recomendaciones formuladas en este plan de acción a la atención de los jefes de estado y de gobierno que se reunirán en septiembre del 2005 con ocasión de la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. En esta Asamblea se examinarán los avances hacia el logro de los OMD. Es la esperanza sincera de los participantes de la Consulta de Chennai que el plan de acción propuesto sea considerado por la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas al defi nir los pasos a seguir hacia el logro de los OMD.La Consulta de Chennai y la producción de este folleto fueron patrocinadas por la Agencia Canadiense para el Desarrollo Internacional (CIDA), la Fundación Ford, el Fondo Internacional para el Desarrollo Agrícola (FIDA), la Agencia Suiza para el Desarrollo y la Cooperación (SDC) y la Fundación Syngenta. Queremos aprovechar esta oportunidad para agradecer a estos donantes, sin cuya generosidad no hubieran sido posibles la celebración de esta sesión y el desarrollo de este plan de acción. Desde comienzos de la domesticación de las plantas para uso humano, hace unos 12,000 años, la agrobiodiversidad ha desempeñado un papel fundamental en la manutención y el fortalecimiento de la seguridad alimentaria, nutricional, de salud y de los medios de vida en todo el mundo. A pesar de los enormes avances logrados en el aumento de la productividad agrícola mediante el mejoramiento mendeliano y, más recientemente, el mejoramiento molecular, más de 800 millones de niños, mujeres y hombres se acuestan cada día sin haber recibido una alimentación adecuada. La mayoría de ellos se encuentra en el sur de Asia y en África Subsahárica -áreas del planeta ricas en biodiversidad agrícola endémica. Reducir el hambre y la pobreza a la mitad para el año 2015 es el primer Objetivo de Desarrollo para el Milenio (ODM), de las Naciones Unidas, un programa mínimo común mundial para la seguridad humana y el bienestar universal. Una evaluación realizada cinco años después de la aprobación de los ODM indica que los avances en la reducción del hambre y la pobreza son insufi cientes. En este entorno, adquieren importancia las conclusiones de una consulta internacional sobre el papel de la agrobiodiversidad en la erradicación de manera sostenible del hambre y la pobreza, celebrada recientemente en Chennai, India.El hambre endémica causada por la desnutrición proteinoenergética, el hambre oculta causada por defi ciencias de hierro, yodo, cinc, vitamina A y otros micronutrimentos en el régimen alimentario, y el hambre transitoria causada por la sequía, las inundaciones y otros desastres naturales pueden ser superadas mediante una estrategia integrada de conservación y uso sostenible y equitativo de la agrobiodiversidad. Incluso durante el tsunami titánico del 26 de diciembre de 2004, se encontraron en las costas de Tamil Nadu, India, líneas nativas de arroz que sobrevivieron la inundación. En el pasado se sembraban muchos cultivos que 'salvan vidas', como los tubérculos y las legumbres; además, necesitamos urgentemente reavivar saberes que tienden a olvidarse y adoptar medidas para salvar cultivos que están desapareciendo y pueden ayudar a sanar las heridas infl igidas por calamidades naturales o 1.producidas por el hombre. Las mujeres, en particular, son las que poseen dichos conocimientos tradicionales y hay que fortalecer y revitalizar la función decisiva que tienen en la conservación y el manejo sostenible de la agrobiodiversidad. Las frutas tropicales, la batata rica en beta-caroteno y otros cultivos de hortalizas pueden ayudar a combatir la defi ciencia de vitamina A en los niños. En otras palabras, la agrobiodiversidad ofrece oportunidades únicas para desarrollar sistemas comunitarios de seguridad alimentaria descentralizados y específi cos al sitio, que incluyen bancos de germoplasma, bancos de semilla y bancos de granos en el campo, desarrollados y manejados por mujeres y hombres de esos sitios. Este enfoque servirá, además, para agrandar la canasta familiar para la seguridad alimentaria puesto que incluye cultivos altamente nutritivos aunque subutilizados. Esta es la vía más sostenible y asequible para lograr el ODM de eliminar el hambre y la pobreza.La agrobiodiversidad ofrece la materia prima decisiva para mejorar, de manera duradera, la productividad y la calidad de los cultivos, el ganado y los peces. Metas como \"salud para todos\" y \"peces para todos\" pueden alcanzarse sólo si se conservan las plantas medicinales y la diversidad genética en los peces. La agrobiodiversidad también ofrece oportunidades, especialmente a la población de escasos recursos sin tierra, para crear empresas que generen empleo e ingresos a partir de una variedad de alimentos, medicamentos, nutracéuticos, biocombustibles y otros productos -todos con valor agregado. Dichas oportunidades poseen un valor particular, ya que hoy día los ingresos inadecuados y el bajo poder adquisitivo son las principales causas de la falta de seguridad alimentaria a nivel doméstico. El potencial que ofrece la agrobiodiversidad para hacer frente al cambio climático no se aprecia bien. En resumen, falta comprender mejor la \"función distintiva\" de la agrobiodiversidad en superar el hambre de manera sostenible, desde el punto de vista ambiental, económico y social, e integrar ese conocimiento a las estrategias nacionales y mundiales para lograr los ODM. También hace falta una mejor nutrición para combatir pandemias como el VIH/SIDA y la tuberculosis, ya que un enfoque basado en medicamentos no conducirá, por sí solo, a los resultados deseados. Los alimentos sanos del mañana serán, en su mayor parte, los cultivos subutilizados de hoy.La agrobiodiversidad y la diversidad cultural se infl uyen mutuamente. Los sistemas de explotación agrícola locales ofrecen materiales básicos para poemas, canciones, bailes y dramatizaciones. Los sistemas de seguridad alimentaria liderados por la comunidad, que se basan en la conservación, el cultivo y el Introducir medidas legislativas para el uso de la tierra y otros recursos naturales de producción para mejorar la capacidad de todos para usar la agrobiodiversidad y sus conocimientos tradicionales asociados con el fi n de promover el empleo fuera de la fi nca y la generación de ingresos en armonía con los 5.1 Cerca de 100 expertos y gestores de políticas con antecedentes variados, procedentes de 25 países, participaron en una consulta internacional en la Fundación M.S. Swaminathan para la Investigación, en Chennai, India, los días 18 y 19 de abril de 2005. Nuestra tarea fue considerar cómo la agrobiodiversidad puede ayudar al mundo a lograr los Objetivos de Desarrollo para el Milenio, y en particular, la meta de un mundo sin hambre ni pobreza. Este evento fue conjuntamente organizado por la Fundación M.S. Swaminathan para la Investigación, el Instituto Internacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos y la Unidad de Facilitación Global para Especies Sub-utilizadas, en cooperación con la Agencia Suiza para el Desarrollo y la Cooperación, la Agencia Canadiense para el Desarrollo Internacional, el Fondo Internacional para el Desarrollo Agrícola, la Fundación Ford y la Fundación Syngenta para la Agricultura Sostenible. derechos tradicionales, la identidad cultural, la integridad del ecosistema y la equidad de género.Fortalecer el sistema multilateral de disposiciones de intercambio del Tratado Internacional de la FAO sobre Recursos Fitogenéticos para la Alimentación y la Agricultura, para ampliar su cobertura de especies vegetales importantes para la seguridad alimentaria y la generación de ingresos de la población de escasos recursos, y garantizar la participación justa y equitativa de los benefi cios obtenidos de la ganancia comercial devengada de los recursos genéticos a los cuales se haya tenido acceso, y trabajar para desarrollar un tratado similar sobre el intercambio multilateral de recursos genéticos animales pertinentes a la alimentación y la agricultura.Reconocer y recompensar los aportes de incalculable valor que hacen la población rural y los pueblos indígenas, en particular las mujeres, a la conservación y el perfeccionamiento de la biodiversidad agrícola, y conferir prestigio social y benefi cio económico a sus preservadores primarios.Promover los mercados locales y facilitar el acceso a los mercados internacionales para los productos de la biodiversidad agrícola, especialmente los alimentos tradicionales y funcionales, garantizando la equidad y la igualdad entre todos los participantes.Defender y fortalecer el alfabetismo nutricional en los países mediante una gestión participativa del conocimiento que involucre a todos los segmentos de la sociedad, en particular a las mujeres y a los jóvenes, y capacitar a los extensionistas agrícolas y a los profesionales de la salud y de la nutrición en la importancia de la diversidad de alimentos en el régimen alimentario y los efectos benéfi cos comprobados de los alimentos tradicionales, para así reestablecer la importancia de la agrobiodiversidad regional en la lucha contra el hambre y la pobreza.Garantizar que los programas de la red de apoyo de seguridad alimentaria y nutricional, en especial los de ayuda alimentaria y alimentación escolar así como los bancos de alimentos fomenten una mayor diversidad de alimentos en el régimen alimentario, ampliando la canasta familiar con más cultivos nativos como parte de la Política Nacional sobre Nutrición.V.Reestructurar las prioridades de investigación y desarrollo para mejorar la productividad, la rentabilidad y el desarrollo de cadenas de valor de una mayor variedad de agrobiodiversidad, incluyendo especies hasta ahora descuidadas, generando así un interés económico en su conservación.Para evitar la pérdida defi nitiva de cultivos que tienden a desaparecer y de saberes que tienden a olvidarse, introducir un cambio de mentalidad mediante iniciativas internacionales que busquen cambiar la imagen del público sobre los cultivos subutilizados y olvidados por medio de medidas como renombrar los \"cereales secundarios\", donde convenga, como \"cereales nutritivos\" y clasifi car una amplia gama de hortalizas verdes, tubérculos, legumbres de grano y frutas tropicales como \"alimentos sanos\". Salvar plantas para salvar vidas y medios de vida debe convertirse en el negocio de todos, para que conlleve a una movimiento mundial de \"agrobiodiversidad para la seguridad de la humanidad\".La lucha mundial contra la pobreza y el hambre no podrá ganarse ahora ni a largo plazo si no se cuenta con mayor colaboración internacional en la conservación y el uso sostenible y equitativo de la agrobiodiversidad. El compromiso internacional es imperativo para tomar medidas respecto a algunas recomendaciones enumeradas anteriormente, mientras que las iniciativas nacionales pueden actuar respecto a otras. Instamos a todos a que empleen enfoques y prácticas pertinentes a su situación individual y a implementar planes detallados propios para hacer un mejor uso de la agrobiodiversidad con el fi n de lograr los ODM en relación con el hambre y la pobreza. El hecho de que, cinco años después de la aprobación de los ODM, la mayoría de las naciones en desarrollo no hayan podido lograr avances proporcionales en la eliminación del hambre y la pobreza indica que un enfoque de \"continuar haciendo lo mismo\" no nos ayudará a alcanzar la meta de un mundo sin hambre. Otro asunto igualmente inquietante es la tasa de crecimiento de la población humana, que continúa superando la tasa de crecimiento en la producción de alimentos, lo cual agrava el hambre endémica inducida por la pobreza. Donde reina el hambre, no puede prevalecer la paz. En consecuencia, ha llegado el momento de abrazar la idea de un sistema de seguridad nutricional que sea sostenible, descentralizado, manejado por la comunidad y basado en un concepto ampliado de la agrobiodiversidad.X."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1695786809.json b/main/part_2/1695786809.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cfa9e416b3b2cce2f4c0792a776d652f454b95c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1695786809.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3cb92d190b4e29023d6c9eb0e481eedc","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e352f94e-c2e8-4352-820b-5bc84458ed38/retrieve","id":"1235666457"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"76a4c2ff-ab29-4551-a4b3-ac5084ba551c","content":"A number of studies have investigated the rational decision-making process within households. In the current study, we also aim to better understand the issue of decision making by women. By bringing together behavioral science and gender research, we want to study how women rationalize, analyze and make decisions, whether at the household level: between her and her husband, or between her and another woman in the household, such as her mother-in-law, or at the level of the group. The investigation is on whether the woman manages to defend her ideas in a mixed group, and when is negotiating with other women in a group, assuming that her behavior may differ depending on who she is dealing with and the nature of the decisions. To provide answers to all these questions, instead of using conventional survey techniques that can be confusing, time-consuming and burdensome for the respondents and the information obtained can be biased, we want to show women sets of video scenarios of different circumstances mentioned, testing treatment such as the nature of decision item (such as transaction costs associated with a technology to adopt) and the level of information available. This research has the wide potential to unraveling the problems of mis-adoption of our technologies including the cultural norms and will inform ways of 'accelerating' decision-making in the future. The study of behavior using videos has advantage of bringing the problems we study to life. We might be able to see and hear, to capture some understanding that might be missed in a narrative description.The different steps taken for carrying out the study included (1) the creation of different video scenarios including different discussion scenes requiring decision making between different people, discussions without and with information: on the choice of varieties to be grown, the choice of varieties to be grown and parboiled, the organization related to the use and operation of the parboiling equipment, and the consumption of parboiled rice; (2) the design of the video scenarios with the involvement of actors with whom the respondents can identify themselves ; and (3) conducting surveys of in the areas where the parboiling units were installed: Atsimo Andrefana, Alaotra Mangoro, Menabe, Sofia et Vakinankaratra. Furthermore, the preliminary results were shared with different stakeholders through a workshop with key actors in women's empowerment.The respondents were videos selected randomly from different categories of decision-making, namely the (1) change of variety, (2) change of variety for parboiling, (3) use of parboiling equipment and (4) consumption of parboiled rice.Three types of decision-making in household setting were designed : (C) husband and wife, (P) wife with mother in law (relatively older woman) and (G) in association of women.An information treatment was included, (a) the arguments were not included, and the decision was based on vague or less-sustained information, and in the opposite case (b) with a set of arguments included to inform the decision. A summary of the options on decisions is presented in the table below : Hence a total of 24 videos were used in the interview, but the respondent had to only watch 4 videos, one of which is randomly drawn from each category 1 . At the end of each video, she/he was asked for her/his opinion, mainly whether or not she/he agreed with the character in the video to make the choice and then the reasons of the decision.The study took place in four regions namely Analamanga, Alaotra Mangoro, Menabe and Sofia, in each reagion, 10 villages were identified and 20 respondents were interviewed in each regions. In total, 832 persons were interviewed individually in their households, no prior link to an agricultural association was previously sought ; 613 women and 219 men were interviewed. The actors engaged in value chain include farmers, purchase and sale of paddy, milling, collecting and wholesale, agro-dealers, processors, parboilers. Consumers are also represented.For the 1595 plots of land for which the information is completed, 36% belong to the respondent, while 34% are declared to be the owner of the respondent's spouse, while for the 13%, it is their parents who own it. For the owners who answered \"myself\" or \"spouse\", 63% of them are male and 36% are female respectively.The majority of plots are managed by the head of household and the spouse, both during the main season and in the off-season. Of the 1595 plots surveyed, 83% are managed by the husband and wife in the household during the main season and 74% during the off-season. The majority of respondents agree with the woman in the video who proposes her idea for change.The negated responses are very small, and overall ranged between 1.4% and 3.2% The chi2 test of whether the responses were differentiated by the respondent's gender or not showed us that the responses did not differentiate by the respondent's gender for the four categories of videos they were shown.It can be seen that the change of varieties is the least rejected by the respondents, while a significant proportion of the respondents say that they do not agree with the use of parboiling equipment and the consumption of parboiled rice.The respondents' perception of the content of the video was assessed on their adequacy of attributes. The proportion of male and female participants is evenly distributed for the 9 aspects questioned, except for \"trust in leaders\", where a higher proportion is observed for the man than for women. It can be said that men have more trust in leaders than women.According to the chi-2 test, we observe that for the first three videos, which are: \"changing varieties, changing varieties for parboiling and the use of parboiling equipment\", there is no significant relationship between the respondent's gender and their trust in the managers. On the other hand, for the video concerning \"the consumption of parboiled rice\" the observed p-value is 0.068. It can be said that there is a insignificant relationship between the gender of the respondent and his or her trust in the leaders.To explicitly see the factors that determine respondents' choice of whether or not to agree with the video character, a model was estimated with the idea thaveo the respondent's decision as an explained variable, i.e. their answer whether or not they agree with the character's proposal to make a decision whether it is on the change of variety, the change of variety for parboiling, the use of parboiling equipment or the consumption of parboiled rice.Where 1.\uD835\uDC4C : explained variable (0/1: agree or disagree)1.\uD835\uDC65 \uD835\uDC56 : Explanatory variables: 1. The Video Category 2.Video Type: With Arguments or Not 3.Discussion Setting: Husband-Wife, Group... 4.Demographic characteristics of the respondent 5.Knowledge of parboiled rice 6.Membership in the group/association 7.Decision-making in rice cultivation...To do this, we should have a video-based dataset instead of a household-based dataset. So, our occurrence now corresponds to a video. In other words, if we have 832 occurrences in the household database and each respondent gives their opinion on 4 videos, we will have 832*4= 3,328 occurrences in the new video database dataset.After processing data, we get our dataset, and the correlation The analysis of each of these variables shows that some variables have more missing values than others because of skipped responses (not applicable). These variables that have too many missing values deteriorate the quality of the model and should be omitted.Since our dependent variable is categorical with two choices (yes or no), our model is therefore a logistic model.We observed that the variable \"video_agree_\" (which refers to the respondent's opinion of the character's idea of adopting certain changes) is significantly explained by these 7 variables: . probit video_agree_ video tot_men riz_cons_var_modern_on deci_particip_01 vid_interet_ vid_nivA workshop was held, to share the experience of using video as a data collection tool, to validate the methodology and the conditions of its use and make recommendations for future. Participants had an interest in the topic and some experience with gender research, from FOFIFA, CIRAD and from FTVM, an umbrella organisation of women associations.On the methodology, the discussion was whether the use of video is appropriate in such a case of decision-making? What are the other cases? Whether the number of videos shown was adequate? And the suggestions for randomization? Unit: household, male and female, female, groups? ➢ Overall the use of video was a daring successful and attractive method. It limited the interference of the enumerator ➢ There may be a video effect, with the respondents more excited by the video irrespectively of the content ➢ Language: while the videos were made in the national malagasy languages, there are regional dialects. The enumerators have to translate the videos, which is not ideal ➢ Targets: Women/female farmers. While women prefer animated video ➢ The choice of 4 videos was adequate, a larger number will confuse ➢ Considering the unit of study, the household has family ties, most common being with grandparents and the associated respect for the elderly it conjures ➢ The nature of the technology is also relevant, between an innovation that is 'regularly' considered (such as varieties), a known technology (such as on-farm mechanization equipment for ploughing, land leveling, etc.), or a technology that is not yet know (in this case, a parboiling equipment)On the videos, the discussion was on whether the content was enough, not a source of bias? Whether the arguments contained the sufficient elements or not ; whether the choice of actors was good, they were typical or distant or persuasive?➢ There could be a lack of concentration of participants when they watched the videos ➢ The actors appear to represent the Highlands and not all the cultures ➢ The setting lacked decoration and was not quite natural. The tone was more pedagogical than cinematographic ➢ The actors could be changed across the different scenes ➢ Also related to the language is the agricultural tonality and gesturing which was missing ➢ Persuasion: the trade-offs of working with well-known actors, well-known people in the area or typical farmers in the regions. The cost implication was also considered. ➢ A lesson on adaptation of the extension message to the context On the analysis, thought about disaggregation by sex, the econometric analysis considering correlations and the decision as an intermediate step to empowerment or the other way around? A question of endogeneity ➢ Indeed it is necessary to present the sex-disaggregated data ➢ The presentation of results should be made palatable to the audience ➢ Revealed agreement and actual change-investigate variables associated with actual behaviour ➢ Proposition to look at the alternative specific variable On decision in households, there may be cultural differences that can also reflect on the composition of households ; whether there are differences in making typical choices -choice of varieties, new technologies, acquisition of household goods, complex Choices, choice in groups and other Social/Economic Differences.➢ Indeed there are differences depending on the regions and ethnicities ➢ Differences between central and peripheral regions ➢ And also differences in where the parboiled rice unit was installed in terms of knowledge about parboiling. This could influence the agreement if the person has prior information."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1736557429.json b/main/part_2/1736557429.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b030647fbdde1db434771cec186203a0591471db --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1736557429.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c82811a25245779fb7454f67e06dc836","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/68f2778c-9eb3-4929-8c89-a10e07ff7855/retrieve","id":"-768803754"},"keywords":["COMESA","Food staples","Trade"],"sieverID":"d130dc0e-3167-44fb-8566-b6b299312fa6","content":"Shrinking productive land coupled with climate change has led to rising food insecurity in COMESA region. The situation has been exacerbated by the rise in food prices as witnessed in the vast majority of COMESA member countries and elsewhere in the world. Intra-regional trade in food staples offers prospects for enhancing food security through cross border trade and movement of food from surplus to deficit areas. The objective of the current study is to analyze the opportunities available in intra-regional trade in food staples in COMESA region. Using data for selected countries in COMESA region, the study finds that, while some countries, or even some regions within the same country, are food surplus, others are food deficit and literally lacking food to buy in some seasons. This creates a framework for a win-win situation-the food surplus countries/regions could get better prices for their products by selling to food deficit countries/regions while food deficit countries/regions could avoid food shortages and extreme food price volatility by allowing inflow of food staples from surplus countries/region. The regional diversity, differential rainfall patterns across the countries coupled with the phenomenon of staggered harvesting due to spatial climatic variability has and will continue to be major stimulus for cross-border trade from food surplus areas in one country to food deficit areas in neighboring countries. The study also finds that a more liberalized cross-border trade leads to reduced price volatility. Further, the analysis of the results shows that trade in staples has grown rapidly in the recent past in the COMESA region. Consequently the impacts of regional trade in food staples in the region cannot be debated. The region is also faced with numerous tariff/nontariff barriers, poor infrastructure and lack of market information which translates to increased transaction costs. The study recommends a regional approach to enhance food security and agricultural growth, rather than a national isolated approach. There is need for a clear follow up and monitoring of the implemented COMESA commitment of eliminating NTBs and prevention of entry of new NTBs. Regional approach is highly advocated to elimination of the NTBs as they are similar across countries in addition to investment in improved infrastructure.Despite improved economic growth in recent years, poverty levels and food insecurity remain unacceptably high in COMESA region. Hunger is still a major problem among COMESA member countries (Figure 1). This scenario has degenerated, especially in periods of food price crisis, 2007-2011. Further, fighting food insecurity is a cross-cutting issue related to poverty alleviation, education and health policies, as well as economic development. Agricultural growth has a critical role in food security and poverty reduction in the COMESA region (COMESA, 2009). But increasing agricultural production and productivity may not be realized in the short run. Thus, regional trade in food staples could be the easiest and the fastest mechanism for enhancing food security and curbing extreme food price volatility (Haggblade et al, 2008a). Further, regional trade is an important channel for the diffusion of technology which stimulates long-term growth and development. There are dual pathways through which regional trade enhances food security-indirectly by promoting economic growth, which improves income and, hence, the access to food and directly by augmenting domestic food supplies, thereby increasing the availability of food and pushing down food prices. Given population growth (Table 1) and growing urbanization, COMESA's market demand for food staples will grow dramatically in the coming decades, and this underscores the need to exploit the potentials in regional trade. Facilitating expansion of regional markets will, therefore, be critical efforts aimed at stimulating agricultural production, broad-based income growth and poverty reduction, and for ensuring food security of vulnerable populations in deficit zones. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: part 2 discusses the study conceptual framework, part 3 discusses the trends of production and supply of food staples in the COMESA region; section 4 examines trends and volatility of food prices; section 5 covers trade patterns, challenges and prospects among COMESA member countries before conclusion and policy recommendations are made in section 6.The potential of intra-regional trade with food staples is one very promising approach to enhancing food security in COMESA region. Intra-regional trade takes place formally and/or informally. Formally involves all trade that is officially traded and is recorded at the customs border points while informal trade accounts for all trade that is not officially recorded at the custom border. The two forms of trade create free movement of food staples in the region. The free movement of food commodities from a surplus to a deficit area can ensure that sufficient food is available. In this way, regional trade contributes to food availability. The supply of food via regional trade takes place either by ensuring ongoing trade flows or during limited periods in time when food is needed. The stability of food supplies can contribute to preventing food crises. Further, the free movement of food within a region may reduce the volatility of food prices. Consumers through open borders benefit from relative price stability in terms of purchasing power while producers benefit from the available cross border markets. However, for the potentials of intraregional trade to be felt, there is need for the political will in coming up and implementing open border policies.To achieve food security through regional trade, the demand and consumption of a specific food staple have to coincide between a food surplus country/area and a food deficit country/area to trigger cross-border trade. Furthermore, the produced and consumed food items have to correspond in the deficit and surplus areas. Otherwise production cannot meet the demand. There is also need for established trade relations between the trading partners in the different areas. For intraregional trade to function in the long run there is need for reduced transportation costs, seasonality and competitiveness in the trading partners. Differences in seasonality may contribute to the availability of food in cases of shortages, by trading across-borders. With regard to production costs, food surplus countries have to compete with other exporting countries and thus have to produce at competitive costs. In conclusion, the main contribution of intra-regional trade to food security is to enhance the availability, accessibility, and stability of food to consumers.This section examines the production and supply trends of food staples in the COMESA region.The main food staple in the COMESA region is maize. Production of the maize crop has, however, been quite erratic in most of the countries possibly due to over-reliance on the natural weather associated with erratic rainfall among other factors (Figure 2). Further, maize yields in a majority of countries in the COMESA region are very low and in most cases have been less than 2 tons/ha for many years, except for Egypt and Mauritius. This compares very poorly with other regions of the world such as Asia, Europe and North America (Figure 3). Despite maize being the key staple in the region, the yields are currently lower than they were at the beginning of the decade. Comparison of the maize yield figures for years 2000-2002 to those of 2006-2008, indicates that maize yields have declined in several countries (figure 3). The countries that registered a decline include Eritrea (59%), Tanzania (54%), Zimbabwe (42%), Swaziland (38%), Uganda (16%), Comoros (11%), Burundi (6%), Djibouti (4%) and DRC (2%). The countries that registered productivity increases were Sudan (115%), Madagascar (65%), Malawi (46%), Ethiopia (29%), Egypt (9%), Kenya (6%), Mauritius (5%), Libya (4%) and Rwanda (4%). The countries with low productivity can benefit from countries with high productivity which can be attained through open cross border trade. 3.2 Supply of food Food supply situation in the COMESA region has been relatively constant with only a slight increase over the 2000 to 2007 period (Figure 4). Figure 4 indicate huge differences in per capita cereal supply between countries-some countries like Egypt have over 200 kg per person per year while others such as Burundi, DRC and Rwanda have an average of less than 40 kg per person per year. Southern Africa region has more food supply than the Eastern Africa region, a manifestation of potential for food movement across countries. COMESA countries should put in place measures that would progressively ensure that food can move easily and cost effectively between countries and between regions within a country. Countries in the COMESA region were affected by the global food price crises of between 2006 and 2010, a period characterized by high and volatile food prices. The situation had a negative impact on the welfare of both producers and consumers. All countries in COMESA region were affected at varying levels by rising food prices. In the recent past, 2011-2012, the global and domestic prices of many food commodities increased substantially (Figure 5). On the other hand, the year 2010 saw domestic meat prices in selected EA countries continue to increase (Figure 8). Over the period, first half of 2011, various countries in EA experienced drought in livestock producing areas: Kenya, Ethiopia and Uganda which may have triggered the high bovine meat price due to reduced supply in the market. This creates an opportunity for cross border trade especially in times of disaster. Further analysis of the domestic food prices of selected countries in COMESA region shows that the food prices are much more volatile than the corresponding global prices (Table 2). Volatility refers to variations in prices over time. This was measured by the use of the coefficient of variation (CV).The CV is calculated as followsWhere, SD is standard deviation.The coefficient of variation of domestic prices of maize in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda is significantly greater than the coefficient of variation of the global maize price (Table 2). This indicates that the domestic food prices are more volatile than the global food prices.Rwanda reports the highest CV followed by Kenya, then Tanzania and Uganda. The CVs are different among the countries of focus. This implies that the severity of high food prices is different in different countries and that the price of a commodity may display different behavior in different countries in the region as also reflected by the trend analysis (see figure 6, 7 and 8). Further, the GARCH model was applied to time series analysis of maize prices in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and globally to show volatility of the maize prices. The GARCH model treats heteroscedasticity as a variance to be modeled, while allowing it to depend upon its previous lags and also predicting the variance of each error term. Specification of the conditional variance isWhere lnσ 2 t is the conditional variance to be modeled and ensures that σ 2 t is not negative even if the parameters are negative.γ measures asymmetry/leverage effect -price response to market shocks-unanticipated changes in prices α measures symmetric effect/ sensitivity of volatility to market events β measures persistence in conditional volatility irrespective of anything happening in the market; ω constantThe results of the GARCH analysis revealed that maize prices are more volatile in Kenya than in Tanzania and Uganda (Figure 9). The domestic maize prices in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda are more volatile than the global maize prices. The extent of volatility is also observed to decline between 2006 and 2010. During this period, 2006 to 2010, the EAC custom union came into force starting 2005. One benefit of the custom union is the free trade. This indicates that liberalized trade in food staples ensures that the farmers in surplus regions/countries are able to sell their produce to deficit areas thus earns better returns for their output while consumers in the deficit regions/countries enjoy guaranteed availability of food staples at fair prices. Returns of maize prices were computed using logarithmic price relativesWhere p t is the monthly price at current time t and pt-1 is the previous price.The price returns also show volatility of the maize prices, where large positive changes are followed by large negative changes (see figure 10). Kenya reported large positive changes which are followed by large negative changes more than the other countries. The global maize pricesshow the least degree of change between the positive and negative changes (figure 10). Trade in food staples is a key aspect in the agricultural sector. It has grown rapidly in the recent past in the COMESA region (Annex 2) due to population growth which has led to expanding markets, favorable economic prospects and rapid rate of urbanization in the region. The regional diversity and differential rainfall patterns across the countries has and will continue to be a major stimulus for cross-border trade from food surplus areas in one country to food deficit areas in neighboring countries. Further, year 2010 total value of food staples trade is estimated at US$ 394,961,000 (Annex 1) which comprises of both formal and informal trade in the region. COMESA region experiences informal trade activities which increase food access and the potential can be exploited through implementation of a more liberalized cross border trade devoid of tariff as well as non-tariff measures. This shows the existence of intra-regional trade whose potentials as mentioned can be exploited. 0 1,000,000,000 2,000,000,000 3,000,000,000 4,000,000,000 5,000,000,000 6,000,000,000 7,000,000,000 Several food security enhancing hotspots exist in Eastern Africa. Examples include most of Uganda, Rift valley region-Kenya, and Southern highlands of Tanzania (Figure 12). The map shows potential for cross border trade where maize can move from surplus to deficit areas within a country and within the region. In Eastern Africa, maize produced in Uganda and Tanzania can be supplied to the Kenyan market, and various other cross-border trade flows can occur in that region. The cross-border trade in food staples will stabilize food supply and food prices in the region through exploiting regional diversity.Source: ReSAKSS-ECA database Potential for cross-border trade lies in the diversity of factors that influence particularly agricultural production. Among the critical factors include the following:Heterogeneity in production due to differentiated harvesting season motivates cross border trade ensuring food access throughout the year. Diversity in agro-ecological zones implies diversified agricultural production; even where countries produce similar agricultural products, spatial climatic variability implies that supplies are available at different times of the year due to staggered harvesting in the region (Figure 13). This can also be explained by the high incidences of drought experienced especially in Eastern Africa. Areas with low food supply are able to receive food from areas with increased supply.Maize serves as the primary food staple in most COMESA member countries. However, there are reported evidence of consumption and substitution of maize with other staple foods. Empirical work in Mozambique shows high levels of cassava consumption as well as substitution between maize and cassava, even in urban areas (Tschirley and Abdula, 2007). In Malawi and Zambia, substitution with cassava is noted when maize is in short supply. Uganda's main staple food is bananas with reported high production of maize which is traded with the neighboring countries.The markets at the border are thus trading posts for the neighboring countries enhancing the movement of people in addition to the movement of food staples across countries from those countries with high supply and low prices to the neighbors with low supply and high prices.Source: Author compilation, 2011 36=Momkambo;37=Kasumbalesa;38=Mkumaniza;39=Nyamapanda;40=Machipanda;41=Kibondo;42=Kigoma;43=Elwark;44=Mpondwe;45=Rusumo;46=Manyovu;47=Dobley Individual countries in COMESA region have small domestic markets, high production costs, low production and deficient investment climates. The countries also report low economic growth rate as there is limited progress in poverty reduction and achievement of MDGs by individual countries. Thus regional diversity including integration will exploit combined resource endowments and potential for economies of scale leading to trade creation, mainly access to market and competition, investment facilitation and regional growth spillover benefits. Cross border trade will benefit the traders from the expanded market base from the COMESA region increasing population. Further, the cross border trade creates opportunities for crossborder investment. Trade can also moderate price shocks in the market (Haggblade et al, 2008b). During drought, staple food production falls and the domestic supply is affected negatively with the food prices going up. With open borders, trade takes place allowing for food imports at low prices to the areas with low food supply. The areas not affected by drought or even low supply can supplement the areas with a deficit provided governments allow food to flow freely across their borders. This may result in price capping. Therefore open borders can be said to offer a means of reducing domestic price volatility of staple foods and lowering the food prices which improves the welfare. When regional markets are functioning, they bear the potential of reducing the dependence from global market supplies and prices, strengthening regional cooperation. Regional cross border trade contributes to increased competitiveness of the region which is beneficial to trade. Promoting cross border trade in food products will not only contribute to reducing food insecurity in the region but will at the same time contribute to the economic development.Transport costs are very high in COMESA region due to high fuel costs and high vehicle maintenance costs due to poor road infrastructural system. This translates to high food prices. Reduced transportation costs translates to producers' increased profitability and competitiveness due to lower marketing costs, while consumers would benefit from lower prices due to reduced food prices. Transportation costs account for over 50% of the total transfer costs (Figure 15). Lack of information is rampant among all stakeholders despite the tremendous amount of information on food situation in COMESA region, both online and hard copies from research. Yet this information is rarely available where and when it is needed neither. In the region, the stakeholders in market value chain cannot tell the food surplus areas for opportunity exploitation.There are also access issues where those who require information most do not have access to it.Traders cannot exploit the areas of surplus and deficit, and farmers cannot exploit quick opportunities arising from high food prices due to lack of market information. It is not unusual to find that policymakers and public officials, NGO representatives and private sector players do not have high quality evidence-based information for making good decisions. This shows lack of link between research and development which affects food security in addition to affecting trade.During times of deficit, national governments impose export-import bans to protect the country's food security. This controls trade flows as food staples cannot be exported to other countries. For example, the export bans imposed by Tanzania, Ethiopia, Sudan, Djibouti and Kenya during the food price crisis. Tackling export-import bans allows free movement of the foods thus reducing food price volatility which eases the food crisis.Agricultural sector is facing the impact of climate change with increases uncertainties in food production and subsequent market behavior. Monitoring regional and national food supply and demand projections in conjunction with increasingly accurate early warning information will allow timely planning for food supplies. FEWS NET has highly invested in early warning system in the region which needs to be enhanced.Under the EAC protocol, NTBs are defined as being laws, regulations, administrative and technical requirements other than tariffs imposed by a partner state whose effect is to impede trade (EAC, 2004). A recent study by Karugia et al. (2009) Countries in the region experience high cost of agricultural production. Fertilizer and certified seed prices are very high resulting to low intensity of use which translates to declining land productivity. The low yields leads to most farmers being subsistence farmers with minimal surplus for sale even locally. However, if there is increased use of fertilizers and certified seeds, the land productivity is increased, yields increase with surplus for sale consequently increasing intra-regional trade.The SWOT analysis of regional trade was analyzed to assess the potential of intra-regional trade.The SWOT analysis is a method used to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. The SWOT analysis may help the farmers to identify the potentials to increase production and for traders to intensify cross-border trade.As strengths, diversified climatic condition implies diversified agricultural production; even where countries produce similar agricultural products, spatial climatic variability implies that supplies are available at different times of the year due to staggered harvesting in the region (see section 5.3.1). The region has potential for cross border trade where food staples can move from surplus to deficit areas within a country and within the COMESA region. As opportunities, informal trade channels open alternative and more flexible markets to traders, the high food price levels in the region enables traders to generate higher income, and the high population at regional level offers increased market base. Existing market distortions, a high number of NTBs, ad hoc export ban and limited market information along the various food staples value chain are major threats for traders. In addition, the underdeveloped transport infrastructure increases the transaction costs threatening the potential of regional trade. One weakness noted is the mistrust among the traders. There is limited/minimal public private partnership in intraregional trade due to the mistrust among the two groups.From table 3, the intra-regional trade weaknesses can be converted into strengths and threats into opportunities. Source: Author compilation, 2012The role of regional trade is not debatable. Increasing regional trade in agriculture and especially in food staples has the potential to moderate the prices and increase availability of food, consequently stimulating agricultural development. However, trade barriers of various kinds impede regional cross border trade and create a less than favorable investment climate for all stakeholders. This is coupled with ad hoc trade policies like export bans that are occasionally imposed by some countries and affect regional trade flows.To increase regional trade and improve food security in COMESA region, this paper recommends:1. A regional approach to food security and agricultural growth, rather than a national isolated approach that does not exploit the regional opportunities in trade and investment. This can be obtained through consultations and consensus among the various governments 2. Clear follow up and monitoring of the implemented COMESA commitment of eliminating NTBs and prevention of entry of new NTBs 3. Enhance investment in early warning system 4. Improved flow of market information to all trade stakeholders and 5. Investment in improved infrastructure. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1752684428.json b/main/part_2/1752684428.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e5c467c94c51d7507b73e90d85288f6db6b019d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1752684428.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1be20186b6702de2916b08319c3c00f3","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/004ce65f-76d0-4af3-9188-cb93ff8e4b1e/retrieve","id":"167588655"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ca61cd89-ee51-46c3-97d9-be206d2f3a22","content":" Farmers with access to seasonal and daily weather forecasting change their cropping strategies as well as their labour schedule. Climate-informed cowpea farmers have greater yields and gross margins. Gains were less significant for sesame production. Further data collection during 2015 season may clarify this difference. Farmers are ready to pay a significant amount for climate forecast information. Large-scale dissemination of climate information can be a climate-smart investment if done in a cautious and proper manner.This infonote summarizes initial findings of a project entitled \"Impact of communicating seasonal climate forecasts to cowpea and sesame farmers in Yatenga region, North Burkina Faso'\" undertaken during the 2014 main agricultural season by scientists from the CCAFS West Africa programme and the Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Burkina Faso.Sesame is a cash crop promoted in recent years to respond to a growing global demand. Quite versatile and produced across the country, yields remain low with an average of 300-350kg/ha. National production was estimated at around 60,000 tons in 2012, mostly for export.Cowpea is a key legume crop, mostly cultivated by smallholder farmers in intercropping with cereals (95%). Yields are low (around 300kg/ha) while it could reach 1,500kg/ha in monoculture. Just a minority (5%) of farmers use modern inputs (improved seeds, fertilizer) and market their grain for the regional market.This project aims at assessing:  The effect of climate information services on farm productivity and incomes for cowpea and sesame farmers in the Yatenga region; Farmers' willingness to pay for such climate information services  Lessons learned for potential scaling up of communicating climate forecasts services in the cowpea and sesame sector as a way to improve farmer climate resilience and productivity.Such studies are also being carried out in climate-smart villages in Senegal (Kaffrine region).In Sahelian climatic zones like in Yatenga region in Northern Burkina Faso, farmers are well aware of climate variability. The date of onset and offset of the rainy season as well as the distribution of rainfall along the growing season, significantly impact on their crop yields, and consequently on family incomes and food security. Three types of climate information were communicated to farmers: downscaled seasonal forecasts, 10-day forecasts and daily climate information.During a one-day workshop in June 2014, before the agricultural season, farmers were presented the seasonal forecasts and discussed about which adaptation strategies to implement. They also shared traditional forecasting practices they usually consider to adapt to interannual climate variability. Indeed, farmers in this region use various natural indicators from stars, trees, insects, birds, wind or temperature to predict how the coming rainy season will be (dry or humid, late or early). Ant migration from low lands to plateaus or a bounty production of shea trees are for instance good signs, whereas birds nesting in low branches of trees or fall of non-mature fruits are bad signs.A second workshop took place in July to communicate updated climate forecasts for the period July-September.The 10-day forecasts as well as daily climate information were disseminated through radio shows. Each farmer from the experimental group (120 farmers) received a radio and a rural radio station (La voix du paysan) was contracted for climate information broadcasting. Farmers were also reached through the extension efforts from the cowpea and sesame value chain development initiativeProjet d'appui aux filières agricoles (PROFIL).The impact of using seasonal forecasts on crop yields, farm inputs use, cost and profits was measured through an ex-post assessment method. The willingness of farmers to pay for such climate information was determined through a contingent valuation method (Terra, 2004). Data show that farmers exposed to climate information change the way they manage their crops. A significant number of farmers use forecasts of the length of rainy season and date of onset to choose which crops and variety to grow, location (more humid low lands or plain) and size of plots. Over half the farmers selected crop variety (51%) and size of plot (56.5%) according to seasonal forecasts, in particular, the rainy season onset information.Daily climate information was used for the day-to-day crop management such as choosing the date of land preparation, plowing, sowing, planting, fertilizing, hoeing, weeding, pest control, harvesting and threshing. The use of farm inputs and labour requirements are different between climate-informed farmers and nonexposed farmers. For cowpea, farmers exposed to climate information used half the total seeds (26kg/ha versus 50kg/ha), but significantly more improved seeds (8kg vs 1.2kg). For sesame, the main difference is the use of inorganic fertilizer (23kg/ha for exposed farmers versus a mere 1kg/ha for the control group). With this cash crop, farmers tend to invest more in fertilizer if they feel less uncertain about climate. Non-exposed farmers tend to use more labour too, for both crops.Such results are not surprising as good use of climate information should lead to an optimal choice of the period of key farm activities (sowing, fertilizing and pest control).The data in table 2 show that cowpea producers exposed to climate information obtained higher yields (847 kg/ha on average compared to 685 kg/ha for the control group), while savings in seed and pesticides led to lower input costs. Consequently, gross margin is much greater for climate-aware farmers (66% higher than the control group).However, climate information did not bring the same economic benefits for sesame production. In fact, farmers exposed to climate information had slightly lower yields (550kg/ha compared to 605kg for the control group) and lower margins as they invested in more fertilizer without significant returns. Climate-aware farmers are more willing to invest in modern inputs but then the financial risks are greater. It raises the question of responsibilities and compensation in case of unreliable forecast (Dabiré and al, 2011). Further investigations during the 2015 season will hopefully explain more about this difference of impact between the two crops.About 68% of farmers exposed to climate information accepted to pay for the seasonal forecast and 69% for the daily climate information. The study showed that farmers exposed to climate information changed their farm practices based on the information they received, and that this translated into better management of inputs to increase their farm productivity and improve their resilience to climate variability.The fact that the effect of climate information on sesame production was not statistically significant illustrates how the impact of climate information services is not straightforward and in some cases do not guarantee returns. This is because of the risk induced by climate variability in Sahel, and also the fact that yields and crop incomes depend on many other factors (e.g. quality of inputs).Promoting "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1754185733.json b/main/part_2/1754185733.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa60cb102eb6fff2acb2f2f645925d717bf3f0b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1754185733.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"fbf09ce677934288506d3a3d62dd4ae7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ed66bd2c-e0b4-4929-9ad3-445e0342ae4d/retrieve","id":"464017744"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5c1aa005-700d-4e37-bc43-1502d3ba6795","content":" Background  Objectives  Process of smoking fish in the area of Abidjan  Materials and methods• More than 80% of the country's fresh fish is traditionally smoked for sale in the local market and for export.• During the smoking process, Benzo(a)Pyrene, PAH of reference, can be released. It is potentially genotoxic and carcinogenic for humans and was found in products destined for export to the EU in 2007.• In 2006, a European by-law (EC no. 1881/2006) determined maximum levels of specific contaminants in food produce (BaP in smoked fish) and thus required surveillance of all smoked products (ETP) to be exported to the EU.3 Background 4• The application of these regulations is a severe setback for this profitable market in Côte d'Ivoire.• Smoked fish accounts for 0.73% of the total export volume which corresponds to 2.30% of foreign currency.• The sector employs approximately 70,000 people who feed another 400,000. There is a risk -423 respondents (88% are women), 59% are no scolarised -67% of operators use branches of rubber tree -Fat fish is preferably used for smoking -GPHs are very unknown as well as dangers encountered-Level of fat content in fish used for smoking > 6% -Concentration of PAHs varies according to the nature of constituents, smoking and compliance of GPHs (fluoranthene is higher in low-fat fish than in fat fish) "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1767275365.json b/main/part_2/1767275365.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9c13eed60f95e7c62d354fda209dd817e47bee4 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1767275365.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e55a380281216c931cd05157ecd17c53","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/0d488e3f-dcf6-4079-b832-2ac24c569bb8/retrieve","id":"733146976"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"588103c3-b5ea-453d-83f5-690451d949fc","content":"• Encouraging agro-ecological principles among at least 50,000 families.• Integrating agroecological metrics.• Developing local capacities, multistakeholder platforms, investments.Target 300,000 farm households, 120 stakeholders, 5 professional training engagements, and 3 Co-design eventsFor 3 value chains, 3 countries, in 3 continents.The PSii Transitions project aims to leverage private and public sector incentives and investments to enable climate-informed agroecological transitions by farmers in low and middle-income countries.For additional information, please contact: Jonathan Mockshell: j.mockshell@cgiar.org•Improving private and private-public sector incentive models to support agroecological transitions for farmers and consumers.•Increasing transparency and traceability in supply chains on agroecological metrics and principles.•Enhancing the capacity of local institutions for engaging in private-public finance models, assessments and policies that support agroecological transitions.PSii Project"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1772624528.json b/main/part_2/1772624528.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc649fc1471e6fd8850b739b3426d8d0da86ecb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1772624528.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"81f05470279d32b23dd1a9a3826a27f1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4435b627-cb66-4f96-93c9-282224abb1e6/retrieve","id":"-2016962245"},"keywords":["CSIRO, Australia","EU, Belgium, CIRAD, France","FAO, Italy","Dutch Government, Netherlands","AsDB, The Philippines","DFID, United Kingdom, NSF, USAID, Rockefeller Foundation, ASARECA, SADC, EARO, FARA, AU/IBAR, CORAF System linkages-Sustainable production, Policy, and Enhancing NARS Users-Farmers, development agents, NARS, ARIs, policy makers and researchers Belgian Survival Fund, Veterinaires sans Frontieres , Belgium","CIRDES, Direction AU, Ethiopía, ITC, Gambia CIAT, CIP, ICARDA System linkages-Sustainable Production, Policy and Enhancing NARS"],"sieverID":"e9041207-7ea2-4fb7-810a-2e1877bf0d18","content":"A world made better for poor people in developing countries by improving agricultural systems in which livestock are important.ILRI works at the crossroads of livestock and poverty, bringing high quality science and capacity building to bear on poverty reduction and sustainable development for poor livestock keepers and their communities.To measurably and sustainably improve the livelihoods of resource-poor livestock keepers, make animal products more affordable and accessible for the poor and conserve natural resources in developing countries through partnerships and alliances for innovative livestock research, training and information exchange.Over the last few years ILRI has realigned itself to meet the challenge of addressing poverty through livestock-related research. When we defined our strategy in 2002, we made a deliberate effort to focus on research outputs that would lead to outcomes having a significant impact on poverty alleviation. We identified three pathways out of poverty in which livestock, one of the central assets of the poor, play an important role. Based on this analysis, we regrouped our research efforts within five themes (Projects) based on their poverty-alleviating strategy.In 2003, we began implementing the new strategy by assembling a new management team with the vision and range of skills appropriate to ILRI's renewed outlook. We also started realigning our existing operating projects and designing new projects that were coherent with theme purposes and more carefully targeted at poverty alleviation. Subsequent developments in this process are presented in this Medium Term Plan.At ILRI, we recognize that livestock systems are complex and that we cannot provide a single 'magic bullet' answer to the complex problem of poverty alleviation. We also recognize that we cannot achieve our desired impacts without partnerships. We are therefore constantly appraising our competencies against what is needed to effectively tackle the issues and those of potential partners to identify those areas where the complementary skills can be used to the best advantage. We then create partnerships that we believe will deliver technology and policy options that will make a positive impact on the needs of poor people.As we move in this new and exciting research direction, we are aware of the importance of maintaining and improving the quality of the science we conduct. We are therefore in the process of establishing an independent Science Advisory Panel, made up of eminent researchers, to provide a regular external input into the assessment of the quality of the research that we are undertaking.The 2005-2007 Medium Term Plan outlines ILRI's work in this new strategic direction over the next three years. Our focus is on impacts, which we aim to achieve together with our strategic partners.We also present the Medium Term Plan of the Systemwide Livestock Programme (SLP), which involves 11 centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and their partners and is convened by ILRI. The SLP was established to support the CGIAR's global livestock research agenda. Its current focus is on livestock feed resources in mixed croplivestock systems in which crop breeding, seed systems, and livestock production expertise from different centres are brought together within a broader integrated natural resource management and policy context.We look forward to becoming more effective in achieving ILRI's primary goal -producing and making available knowledge and products that will make a positive difference in the lives of the poor.ILRI's stated mandate is to reduce poverty and make sustainable development possible through livestock-related research. ILRI is determined to ensure that its research effectively contributes towards meeting the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) for poverty alleviation. Along with our other research and development partners, ILRI is keenly aware of the need to enhance the relevance and impact of its research in a rapidly changing global context. ILRI's strategy is grounded on two premises: the Livestock Revolution and the multiple roles of livestock in the livelihood strategies of poor people. The Livestock Revolution encapsulates the fact that as developing country societies become more urban and experience economic growth, their food consumption patterns increasingly shift to high-value and processed foods such as animal products, oils and vegetables. This demand growth creates a unique opportunity for the growth of the livestock sector. ILRI's goal is to maximize the value of this development opportunity as a tool to reduce poverty by enhancing the participation of poor people in dynamic livestock value chains, thereby providing them with increased incomes. While global change and market forces present many opportunities, they also pose threats for poor livestock producers. Increasing length of food chains, growing concerns about food safety and economies of scale in intensive production systems are threatening the participation of poor livestock keepers in these increasingly complex markets. Public research on technologies, institutions and policies can create more pro-poor options. Vertical coordination of smallholder livestock keepers, for example, may allow smallscale producers to remain in high-value market chains, but it also raises issues of empowerment for the poor that research on pro-poor cases can learn from to improve results elsewhere.Structural change related to rapidly growing demand for livestock products is leading to the development of large-scale production units, which can better address food safety concerns of urban markets. If developed with the appropriate policies to eliminate negative food safety impacts, these developments can have pro-poor impacts under certain conditions, particularly when related to employment of poor people in activities along the value chain. The magnitude of these poverty alleviation impacts is dependent on the forward and backward linkages of such livestock enterprises, as well as the propensity of those employed in these enterprises to spend their new livestock incomes on consumer items and services typically produced by the very poor.The opportunities for using livestock as a tool for poverty reduction particularly hinge on rapid growth in demand for livestock products. In many parts of the developing world, poor livestock keepers do not have these opportunities. Nevertheless livestock frequently are a key component of poor peoples' livelihood strategies, with livestock assets providing services such as transport, traction for land preparation and a source of manure for soils depleted of organic material. ILRI's strategy recognizes that quite distinct tools are required to reduce poverty under such circumstances. Careful analysis is required to understand the constraints and opportunities under these conditions. Frequently, very marginal environments put a ceiling on potential productivity increases. Here, public livestock research and development can reduce vulnerability in a number of ways, such as provision of vaccines, insurance schemes against natural disasters and early warning systems. In many settings livestock will be only one of several diverse strategies needed to escape poverty.In better-endowed regions with poor access to markets, mixed farming systems are predominant. Productivity increases, for example, through better utilization of crop residues in ruminant production, introduction of fodder species and adapted livestock genotypes are potential entry points. The success of such productivityincreasing interventions is generally linked to reducing market constraints.Livestock play an increasing role in periurban systems. These systems are driven by growth of urban demand and inefficiency of market chains linking more remote producers to these markets. These systems frequently also provide income opportunities for landless poor, who provide fodder, collect waste to feed to animals and engage in distribution and marketing of outputs of such informal systems. The externalities associated with these systems, however, present formidable public health issues and environmental challenges.ILRI research recognizes the importance of animal products for poor consumers, for whom targeted research that raises productivity, improves food safety and lowers marketing costs in the sectors serving poor consumers can increase their access to lower cost and more reliable supplies of safe animal-source foods. In many cases these consumers spend a significant share of their disposable income on animal products, which provide an important source of minerals and micronutrients to their diets. Access to small amounts of these nutrients has been shown to benefit the physical and cognitive development of children, as well as mitigating the effects of diseases such as HIV/AIDS.Given the above context for livestock as a tool to address poverty, ILRI has adopted a \"pathways out of poverty\" framework, based on the sustainable livelihoods approach. In this approach, it is recognized that poor households face a range of external threats that influence their livelihoods. The challenge for these households is to manage their limited asset base through a set of livelihood strategies conditioned by processes and structures, both internal to the households and in the external environment, to generate desired outcomes that usually include higher income and reduced vulnerability. The three pathways through which ILRI seeks to improve the contribution of livestock in poor households are:• securing the assets of the poor • improving the productivity of their livestock systems • improving their market opportunities Through these pathways, ILRI seeks to take advantage of the potentials for livestock and livestock-related research to ensure uptake of improved technologies, policies and institutions that will contribute to improving the well-being of the poor.The work is organized in five interdisciplinary issue-oriented themes (referred to as Projects in the CGIAR Medium Term Plan terminology) ILRI has undergone significant change in the way it conducts its research to ensure maximum impact on poverty. Some salient aspects of this change in approach include:• An explicit strategy to address poverty as the key MDG to which ILRI can contribute • A new theme on innovation systems research to ensure full stakeholder 1 In this MTP the following hierarchy of \"projects\" is adopted; Project (with a capital P) is one of the 5 ILRI research Themes (the Systemwide Livestock Programme is presented as ILRI Project 6); an operating project is a group of related research activities within a Theme leading to common outputs in a defined time frame -Projects have 3-5 operating projects; within operating projects, a project (with a small p) is a defined donor-funded or partner-based research activity. involvement in the development of research activities with high likelihood of leading to rapid uptake of innovations.• Focus on markets and market access as a key driver influencing the potential of livestock to contribute to poverty reduction and economic growth.To achieve our goals, ILRI has developed a range of innovative institutional partnership arrangements. These partnerships are demand-driven and outcome-oriented and involve linking with advanced research institutes (ARIs), Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), farmer groups, the private sector, national agricultural research and extension systems, universities and other CGIAR centres. They are guided by a set of institutional principles that ILRI has developed. Some examples that highlight this innovative way of doing business differently include:• Establishment of a joint program with IFPRI to merge insights from broad economic policy thinking with specialized knowledge of livestock science and to achieve synergies through better inclusion of ILRI's livestock work into a broader CGIAR emphasis on improving smallholder livelihoods through diversification into highvalue agriculture more generally.• Emphasis on application of advanced biosciences to \"orphan\" problems, expanding the scope of the work by establishing with others a shared biosciences facility for eastern and central Africa. This will enlarge the capacity of African partners to address their biosciences research needs and will allow ILRI to share its expertise more widely than in the past.• Establishment of a range of strategic partnerships to address the challenges. This includes partnerships with other CGIAR centres on the Addis Ababa campus to provide a platform for integrated natural resource management (INRM), innovation systems and capacity building. Centres involved presently include CIAT, ICRAF, IFPRI (including its ISNAR program), IWMI, CIMMYT, and ICIPE. Similar partnerships in other parts of the world include ICRISAT and IITA, among others.• A special relationship with the Animal Production and Health (AGA) division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).• A private-public partnership involving a large pharmaceutical company and several advanced research institutes to develop a new East Coast fever vaccine.• An innovative partnership with an NGO (Veterinaires sans Frontieres-Belgium) to explore options for the delivery of animal health services.• The inclusion of individual and institutional capacity strengthening as an integral part of all ILRI's research activities.• The establishment of a joint laboratory for animal and forage genetic resources characterization with the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing.ILRI sees its comparative advantage evolving as an institution engaged in livestock knowledge discovery and management for poverty alleviation and sustainable development in developing countries. Many other institutions are also addressing these issues; they include national agricultural research systems (NARS) and sub-regional organizations (SROs), research and analysis units within government departments, ARIs and universities, NGOs and private firms and consultants. ILRI is developing productive partnerships with all of these types of institutions. Yet ILRI is at the crossroads of livestock research and social objectives such as poverty alleviation in a way that is rarely seen elsewhere.As a CGIAR centre, ILRI has a comparative advantage in focusing on those issues of widespread and critical relevance where insights can be transferred and synergies achieved across countries, regions and different kinds of organizations. While ARIs, universities, NGOs and private consultants may also be engaged in the production of international public goods, the reality of their modes of operation and funding rarely permits maintaining scientific commitment on an institutional basis to solve specific long-term problems in developing countries, and then ensuring uptake of discoveries. Furthermore, few institutions in developing countries are as well-placed to achieve effective long-term coordination between the rigorous hypothesis-testing of hard livestock-related science and the pragmatic experimentation of action-research in the field.ILRI achieves its comparative advantage through a form of organization and governance that overcomes many of the constraints imposed on other types of institutions in the livestock knowledge discovery and management area. With offices in East and West Africa, South and Southeast Asia, China and Central America, and projects in Southern Africa, North Africa and the Near East, ILRI has a truly global footprint. Yet its internal form of organization is not regional but thematic. ILRI's agenda and way of operating is heavily influenced through long-term host country, regional and global agreements with NARS and SROs, and with specialized livestock-relevant institutions in the development sphere such as the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) and the Animal Health and Production Division of FAO. It also partners to a great extent with sister CGIAR centres, both directly and through the System-wide Livestock Programme. Coherence across needs and opportunities is achieved not only by ILRI's staff and management, but also by an internationally appointed and crossdisciplinary Board of Trustees representing stakeholders with both research and development perspectives.The resulting institutional form allows ILRI to be a centre of excellence in providing:• A flexible framework that can address evolving needs and concerns through new partnerships, including with public-and privatesector entities;• A long-term clearing-house for livestock knowledge and research in its relation to technical, social and economic objectives;• An institutional memory and accessible database on livestock issues and answers in developing countries;• A diagnostic capacity with respect to livestock knowledge and discovery that draws on insights from around the world and across disciplines;• A means to integrate in a problemsolving format insights across disciplines as diverse as upstream microbiology, genetics, veterinary epidemiology, economics, nutrition and innovation systems science;• An approach to associating in the same activities both the rigor of scientific hypothesis-testing and the impact-oriented but more pragmatic approaches of action-research in the field;• A commitment to foster knowledge uptake, diffusion and capacitybuilding in developing countries.• A mode of governance that facilitates openness, accessibility and accountability to developing countries.The implementation plan for the revised ILRI strategy was presented in the last medium-term plan (MTP) for 2004-2006 along with brief general descriptions of the 5 ILRI Projects. Over the past year, the structure and function of the research programme have continued to evolve. More detailed research plans of Projects and their constituent operating projects have been developed. A summary of these are presented below.This Project investigates how livestock systems evolve to anticipate where, when and how livestock-related policy and technological interventions can best be targeted to alleviate poverty, sustain rural livelihoods and protect the environment. Research outputs for the operating projects in this Project are:• Livestock system evolution: Activities include identification of drivers of change and their impact on livestock systems in the future; assessment of scenarios of alternative livestock system futures from different livestock development pathways and drivers of change; and analyses of these changes on households and communities across different regions.• Poverty, livelihoods and livestock: ILRI is developing databases and analyses of where significant groups of poor livestock keepers are located. It is also seeking to better understand the relationships between poverty, livelihoods and development strategies, the role of livestock in poverty processes and dynamics, and vulnerability, risk management and livelihood options.Major activities focus on targeting livestock interventions and identifying their niches and contribution to the livelihoods of poor livestock keepers; targeting systems in which ILRI and partners have the greatest potential for maximizing the opportunities for poverty reduction; ex-ante and ex-post impact assessment of interventions promoted by ILRI and its partners; and development of priority-setting frameworks for ILRI and/or its partners.Under ILRI's new strategy, priority is being given to efforts to gain a clear understanding of the mechanisms that make research more effective and efficient, knowledge more contagious, processes more inclusive and outcomes more in favour of livestock-dependent poor people. Research and capacity strengthening activities are organized in three operating projects:• Innovation systems: Ideas need to travel from the provider or the innovator to potential users and vice versa. Study of past, present and emerging innovation systems will disclose innovation processes and mechanisms that facilitate suitable knowledge exchange, the influence of research approaches on innovation and impact, the measurement and determinants of innovation (indicators and inducers), and how information within livestock knowledge systems is generated, acquired, used and circulated.• Research delivery pathways: This 'action research' operating project consists of a variety of studies in which clients and other actors are directly involved in the identification of constraints and opportunities and the development and testing of methodological, technical and institutional solutions. The case studies focus on the comparison of particular technologies, management strategies and delivery systems in different policy, institutional, socio-economic and biophysical settings.• Innovative partnerships: Activities conducted under this operating project evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different types of partnerships in the identification of research needs, research implementation, dissemination and iteration, and the acquisition of funds. In addition, they provide an increased understanding of the institutional and organizational changes that empower different research and development partnerships. Such lessons drive and facilitate institutional change and capacity building and are a conduit for the promotion of innovative processes that transform the way in which ILRI and its partners go about their business.Marketing livestock and their products has long been an essential pathway for income generation and livelihoods for the poor. Research has shown consistently that even the poorest can gainfully participate in livestock markets. Rapidly growing livestock markets in the developing world provide real opportunities but also significant threats to participation of the poor due to structural changes associated with globalization, the increasing concentration of population and production around cities, and a changing regulatory environment. To counter these threats by bringing together their policy and technical capacities from macro-to microlevels, ILRI and IFPRI have developed a joint programme to improve the market success of poor livestock keepers. This programme has three operating project areas of focus. Each institute will contribute in its area of expertise, achieving synergies across disciplines and research approaches, while avoiding overlaps. Project 5 developments for 2004:As part of the \"Comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture\", ILRI continued its research on livestock management associated with community-based irrigation systems in Ethiopia. At least five master's theses along with other analyses will provide more in-depth understanding of how investments in community-based irrigation systems could be better designed and managed to accommodate the livestock keepers who are and will be users of the systems.• New analyses of the trade-offs between poverty reduction and wildlife conservation in East Africa revealed an elusive win-win: innovative environmental payment schemes double the incomes of the poorest households when they need it most during droughts and conserve wildlife and livestock grazing corridors for the benefit of pastoralists, their livestock and wildlife alike.• ILRI has begun playing a key facilitation role to support research efforts in Africa and globally to raise awareness about the growing threat to human health of cysticercosis caused by a pork tapeworm. A senior researcher in veterinary parasitology, seconded from Denmark to lead this work at ILRI, has organized an international conference in Italy in September to initiate a global control campaign.• To guide development of its new research programme on the impacts of livestock keeping on human health, state-of-the-art reviews are being conducted on the links between livestock keeping and nutritional wellbeing among the poor and the role of livestock in coping with HIV/AIDS. ILRI has also initiated activities in Ethiopia focusing on the nutritional impact of animal-source foods in weaning-age infants.• ILRI continued to maintain its commitments under the in-trust agreement with FAO and is upgrading and strengthening forage genebank operations with additional staffing, facilities and an increased level of activity with funding from World Bank. This will allow ILRI to reduce backlogs in managing the forage germplasm collection and improve the quality and availability of information about the intrust collection.As in the 2004-6 MTP, the overall trends in the ILRI portfolio will be to:• maintain a strong emphasis on sub-Saharan Africa while increasing activities in South Asia; Work has been initiated with FAO and IFPRI on output 3, with a desk study of cross-country SPS issues and the likely impact on developing countries of changes in OECD regulations with regard to animal imports. In addition, there has been a significant investment of staff time in participating with major hard-science labs around the world in a new $70 million proposal for a Global Alliance on FMD Research, which focuses on vaccine development. ILRI leads the social science/policy part of the proposal with a view to identifying opportunities to make innovations of the project more pro-poor.The Project 4 portfolio remains virtually unchanged from the 2004-6 MTP. Research on vaccines and diagnostics, conservation of genetic resources and livestock genetic improvement continues as planned. Major funding raising efforts have been made in these areas over the past year (with the success of many of these known in 2005).Two strategic changes from the Project portfolio presented in the 2004-6 MTP have been made. The first is that two systems research operating projects have been formed. The first operating project focuses on improving and sustaining water and nutrient productivity in livestock systems.The second investigates land use and land management issues, largely in pastoral and crop-livestock systems.The second change is in research on foodfeed crops. This work has been realigned to consider the broader issues of mitigating feed scarcity, a strategy that takes account of the diversity of livestock feeding systems and the need to target such research to end-user strategies. This activity is done in collaboration with Project 1 and the SLP. The other focus on the feeding strategies research is to better understand farmer and other demand for different feeding options and how this demand can be met through different delivery pathways, institutional partnerships and information exchange strategies. This research is conducted with Project 2 and the SLP.Research in the area of human health and nutrition continues to evolve with strategic partnerships being made both within ILRI (especially Project 3) and with new partners outside the institute. A focus on cysticercosis as both a specific disease of the poor and a model system has emerged.The need to synthesize key information on the role of livestock in human nutrition and in households suffering from HIV/AIDS forms a priority area for 2005.ILRI will continue to work through collaborative arrangements to provide expertise in livestock and livestock-related research, strengthening and deepening its partnerships with key livestock research and development institutions and organizations. A fundamental change in culture and process is envisaged to support innovations at all levels, from individual livestock keepers to national and international decision makers. Several types of partnerships, traditional and nontraditional, will be strengthened.Traditional partnerships with NARES and CGIAR partners will continue to be built upon.Linkages with the private sector and NGOs are becoming increasingly important to ILRI's development and delivery of products from its research. Diagnostic tests for four tick-borne diseases have been developed and validated by ILRI and partners. Through a public-private partnership arrangement, ILRI has transferred the commercial production and distribution of these kits to Svanova Biotech AB, a company based in Uppsala, Sweden.The most effective way of addressing poverty through livestock research at a global level is combining, in a research consortium approach, the efforts of international centres and their local partners. Such an approach allows for sharing institutional resources and crossfertilization of experiences from one geographic area to another. For the SLP to contribute more effectively to the CGIAR goals and the Millennium Development Goal of reducing poverty, the inter-centre LPG revised its strategy. The strategy now focuses on improved foodfeed systems as a key entry point for increasing the productivity and enhancing the natural resources that sustain smallscale crop-livestock agriculture. It builds on initial work done by the SLP and its centre members in incorporating feed-related traits into the genetic enhancement and crop management programmes of key food crops. Research achievements in food-feed systems by its CGIAR centre members and their partners were highlighted in a special issue of the journal Field Crops Research on \"Approaches to improve the utilization of food-feed crops\" (Volume 84, Issues 1-2, October-November 2003).The SLP initiated new strategies to disseminate fodder technologies that enhance the livelihoods of small-scale farmers. The funding environment is similar to that of previous years, with pressure on unrestricted funding continuing to increase. The Board and Management continue to emphasize and spend considerable time on raising resources.In the medium term, ILRI expects to continue to grow, while balancing its expenditures against the revenues. Improve the performance of stakeholders through partnerships and alliances Improved policies fostering poverty reduction through sustainable livestock production implemented by national, regional and international decision makers Relevance of research products (technologies, information, tools, methodologies, practices, and policy recommendations) from ILRI and its partners as judged by the number that are adopted and the extent to which they are implemented by stakeholders Value of stakeholders' institutional innovations and enhanced capacities as assessed by their support, relevance and impactExtent to which livestock development is linked to national and regional planning and developmentTools, methods and information available for use by investors and partners to improve the prioritisation, targeting and delivery of interventions for pro-poor development in evolving agricultural systems (CG1-5) Methods and capacities developed to enhance the effectiveness of public and private institutions and organizations in systems involving livestock. Innovative research partnership arrangements with key players including NARES, ARIs and the private sector (CG 1-5) Improved food-feed crops developed, evaluated and available to NARES and private sector partners for promotion, dissemination and delivery (CG1 and 3) Affordable technologies and methodologies (livestock nutrition, health and genetics) developed and available to NARES and private sector partners for promotion, delivery and dissemination (CG1 and 3) Tools, methods and capacities developed and available to NARES for enhancing the conservation and utilisation of indigenous animal and forage genetic resources (CG2) Management practices, technologies, policies and research methodologies developed and available to NARES and national, regional and international health and environmental agencies for enhancing human health and nutrition and the health and sustainability of ecosystems involving livestock (CG 3) Policy-relevant tools, methods and recommendations developed and available to policy makers and regulators to enhance market access for poor producers and ensure food safety for consumers (CG4) Policy-relevant information and communication products on global livestock issues available to public and private sector partners and the general public (CG4 and 5) Increased knowledge and capacity of NARES and regional research organisations for livestock research and development (CG5)International investors and national and regional partners refer to targeting tools and information in planning documents each year from 2004Dual-purpose food-feed crops assessed on-farm and proven varieties adopted in Africa and Asia more open trade in some areas is transforming the nature of livestock production and livestock ecosystems, and placing pressures on natural resources and coping strategies of the poor. This project examines those changes and models their driving forces, measures the consequences in terms of poverty, growth opportunities, social equity and the environment, and applies that knowledge to provide both strategic and applied targeting for research and development interventions. This understanding of livestock systems evolution, the role of livestock in sustainable poverty alleviation, and its consequences for both people and the environment, is translated with development partners into improved policy and technology options, investment priorities, livestock development strategies, and capacity strengthening.• Driving forces of livestock system evolution and alternative scenarios of livestock systems development identified, consequences determined, and results documented and made available to development partners • Improved understanding of poverty processes, livelihood strategies and the role of livestock used in the design of poverty reduction programs, projects and policy • Better information and knowledge made available to development partners on interventions and investment opportunities and their impacts on the livelihoods and assets of poor livestock keepers and the environment.The outputs from this project will identify how investments in livestock research and development interventions can be increasingly targeted to ensure the greatest impact on poor people, in ways that are socially equitable and ecologically sound. The enhanced understanding of predicted opportunities, risks, and trade-offs will be used to develop appropriate strategies for livestock research and development. Targeting livestock research and development investments through targeted policy options, technologies, project design and appropriate project strategies will lead to better returns on investments in research and more efficient use of public investments and donor funds . Designing pro-poor interventions built on poverty diagnostics, understanding of expected economic, social, and environmental impacts will enhance the effectiveness of pro poor interventions that maximize poverty impacts. Building national and institutional capacity in partner organizations will improve the analytical rigor and country ownership that will help ensure that development inventions focus on poverty reduction and research outputs are utilized to have the greatest impact on poverty reduction. Although systematic approaches for generating and disseminating technologies from research through extension have worked well for certain clients and in certain settings, the traditional linear paradigm has often failed to address the needs or have significant impact among the poor. This has been attributed in part to a failure to fully engage poor livestock keepers and other stakeholders in such processes, and to understand their circumstances and realities, thus failing to create an environment that would facilitate the identification, adaptation and dissemination of promising technological and institutional innovations. For this reason, under ILRI's new strategy, priority is being given to efforts to gain a clear understanding of the mechanisms that make research more effective and efficient, knowledge more contagious, processes more inclusive and outcomes more in favour of livestock-dependent poor people. Consequently, the Enabling Innovation Theme focuses on the development and testing of approaches and partnerships that (i) enable the identification of agreed, prioritised, researchable constraints that affect livestock-dependent poor people under the three ILRI-identified development pathways, (ii) ensure the implementation of research in a manner which effectively and efficiently addresses those constraints, and (iii) guarantee the use of media and pathways to facilitate knowledge flows amongst all stakeholders that enable pro-poor outcomes. • Gaps and opportunities identified in at least 2 livestock-knowledge exchange mechanisms for the rural poor • Options that maximise the contribution that fodder makes to livestock-dependent poor people tested and adopted in West Africa and India • Options for crop-livestock systems of livestock-dependent poor people in West Africa tested and adopted using participatory approaches and scaling-up and out strategies formulated. Institutional and organizational changes that empower partnerships and enhance interactions among actors along the innovation process adopted ILRI and its partners have mainstreamed a process of reflection, reframing and use of lessons learned during the research process that results in documented changes in behaviour, performance assessment and in increased impact Knowledge and innovation systems that make research more effective and efficient, knowledge more contagious, processes more inclusive and outcomes more in favour of livestock-dependent poor people Candidate methodological, technical, institutional and policy options are appropriate for evaluation and dissemination Publications, datasets, conference proceedings and reports Marketing of livestock and their products has long been an essential pathway for income generation and livelihoods for the poor. Research has shown consistently that even the poorest can gainfully participate in livestock markets. Rapidly growing livestock markets in the developing world provide real opportunities but also significant threats to participation of the poor, due to structural changes associated with globalization, the increasing concentration of population and production around cities, and a changing regulatory environment. To counter these threats by bringing together their policy and technical capacities from macro to micro level, ILRI and IFPRI have developed a joint program to improve the market success of poor livestock keepers. This program has 3 project areas of focus. Each institute will contribute in its area of expertise, achieving synergies across disciplines and research approaches, while avoiding overlaps.• Smallholder competitiveness in changing markets: Although both IFPRI and ILRI research has demonstrated that smallholders can be more efficient in generating profits per unit output than that large-scale operators in many livestock production activities, it has also demonstrated major differences across farms. There is considerable scope for helping poor and disadvantaged persons who might otherwise be left behind to join a market-driven pathway to improving their livelihoods through livestock. A mix of technical, institutional, and policy options are tested and adapted to increase the ability of smallholder and disadvantaged livestock producers to remain commerciallyviable in the face of changing market requirements and increased competition from imports. The initial focus of this work has been in smallholder dairy systems of Africa and Asia. Increasing emphasis will be given to smallholder poultry and pig enterprises in Asia and Africa.In response to concentrating and rising consumer demand for livestock products in many parts of the developing world, market chains are becoming more concentrated and difficult for independent small-scale operators to function in. In part chains are becoming longer, in part individual operators are becoming larger-scale, and in part consumers are becoming more demanding in terms of quality and food safety. This project focuses on identification of the driving forces affecting the accessibility of market channels by the poor and disadvantaged, and on institutional innovations, technical interventions, and other opportunities for helping them respond to new market requirements. This research is also targeted to helping poor consumers in urban centers benefit from safer livestock and milk products that might otherwise become too expensive to access in more formal retail channels.• Diseases of trade and markets: Major global procedures and patterns for control of animal disease on a world-wide scale set up in the 1950s and 1960s are under challenge from structural changes in the distribution of livestock production and consumption, globalization, changes in technological options for disease control, and changes in public acceptance in the industrialized countries of traditional approaches to disease control involving mass slaughters in the event of disease outbreaks. Changing opportunities for export to high-value markets from developing countries are currently leading to disease control strategies that exclude the poor and small-scale sector from livestock production altogether. Several of the many options being discussed for changing methods of control of traderelevant diseases such as FMD could lead to a major re-alignment of trade in meat across countries. Especially promising are new frontiers for vaccine development that overcome old constraints in developing countries, and new technologies for providing better traceability of products. This project will associate risk analysis from the perspective of veterinary epidemiology with economic research on trade implications of different options for disease control and research on the distributional impact within developing countries of different paths.• Technical, institutional and policy options identified that increase the ability of smallholder and disadvantaged livestock producers to expand commercially-viable livestock enterprises; • Technical, organizational, and policy options identified for improved market institutions and servicing of small-scale, poor and disadvantaged producers and consumers, in the context of rising demand for reliable quality, food safety, and increased openness to trade; • Impact on market channels and prices of changing methods and regulations of animal disease control assessed and options identified for countries, small-scale and poor producers to comply with changing animal disease control measures at the national and international levels;• Capacity built among national collaborators and collaborating institutions for assessment of technical, institutional, and policy options to increase the market access of poor, small-scale and disadvantaged livestock producers and consumers.This project will contribute to increased productivity and improved livelihoods for smallholder farmers and market agents, especially poorer and more vulnerable groups, through increased access to input and output markets for livestock products, and appropriate technology adoption on farms and in small-scale livestock markets. Consumers will benefit from lower or stabilized prices, and better quality livestock products.• Causes and consequences of scaling-up of individual livestock production operations and assessment of options for improving the impact on smallholders identified and documented in a comparative study of selected fast-growing developing countries • Assessment of technical options and trends affecting institutional barriers to increased small farm sales of small ruminants in Near East-North Africa • Best practices for smallholder inclusion in dairy markets identified and documented from a comparative series of case studies in East Africa and South Asia • Technical and policy options assessed for improving the efficiency and food safety performance of small scale agents in East African urban markets, in the context of small-scale producers • The potential impact of changes in OECD country animal health and food safety regulations on developing country exports of livestock products, and associated impacts on poor and small-scale producers assessed • Policy options assessed for decreasing the transfer costs of livestock produced and marketed by poor people and small-scale operators in the Central Sahel and destined for the Central Coast of West Africa• Constraints to smallholder participation in pig, live poultry, and egg markets assessed and documented in Southeast Asia • Pros and cons of contract farming for livestock in South and SE Asia assessed and documented and policy domains for further research identified • Characterization and analysis of small ruminant health delivery systems and market access in the near east-North Africa • The profitability of farm-level investments in forage technology and net farm income at different levels of scale in Central America estimated • Policy recommendations formulated and disseminated of the options for using contract farming of livestock to promote increased smallholder productivity and participation in livestock product markets in South and Southeast Asia• Key trends in changing demand attributes for livestock products in a sample of developing countries with different geographical, demographic, and economic characteristics identified and documented • Identification and pilot testing of improved animal health, feeding, breeding, finance and credit, market levies and service strategies, both technical and organizational, to improve delivery of services and market access to poor farmers in selected countries of Near East--North Africa • Policy options for alleviating constraints to smallholder participation in growing beef and milk markets in Central America identified and documented • Policy options identified and documented for regulatory and institutional change in developing countries that will help meet both external and internal food safety and animal health concerns, while minimizing negative impacts on small-scale producers Improved disease control strategies through use of disease resistant livestock and improved diagnostics and vaccines will help secure livestock assets and increase productivity, while also reducing chemical and drug usage hence improving environmental health. Access to information, tools and strategies to support conservation and use of appropriate genetic resources that have better survival and are more productive and less susceptible to fluctuating environments than exotic genotypes in low input systems, thus securing assets, and improving farmers' income and food security. Enhanced capacity development and training transfers technologies into the hands of national and regional partners to drive their own research and development priorities.• Strategic, technical and laboratory support provided for regional vector-borne disease control programmes from 2004 onwards Holistic, integrated and community-based approaches that encompass health and nutrition of the poor, the increasing pressure on the natural resources that sustain their livelihoods and options to increase agricultural productivity suitable to their resource endowment, are required to effectively reduce rural poverty. By using such approaches in addressing opportunities at the interface of human well-being, livestock production and the environment, this project provides an entry point to enhance human health and nutrition, ensure the sustainability of agro-ecosystems is maintained and improve livestock production. The research takes an integrated natural resource management approach, considering both the positive and negative effects of livestock and their products on the health of livestock keepers, agroecosystems and changing land use systems. Central to this approach is the application of sustainable production practices in which the synergies from crop-livestock integration are captured. Forages and food-feed crops are used as targeted inputs in smallholder systems, to enhance productivity, natural resource management efficiency and human well-being.• Livestock-related options such as feed sourcing, watering practices, grazing and animal waste management strategies for improved use and conservation of water and soil are available for adoption by institutions and livestock keepers • Policy makers, national and community organisations and household members use improved information, strategies, and processes to develop better policies, innovate new solutions, and strengthen their capacity to improve livelihoods and land management in smallholder livestock systems • Strategies to reduce health risks and improve nutritional benefits associated with livestock keeping designed and applied to improve human health and well-being • Fodder constraints facing resource poor crop-livestock farmers are alleviated to improve livelihoods • Forage diversity saved, studied and used to contribute to agricultural sustainability of smallholder farming systemsThis project will identify strategies based on research of sustainable livestock production practices to enhance livelihoods of the poor through their contribution to better natural resource management and agro-ecosystem health. An important contribution will be to address, in a holistic manner, the links between livestock and human health, water, nutrition, agricultural production and land use change. The strategic use of animal-source foods to improve the nutrition of the poor, particularly young infants and children, will be confirmed and promoted. It will also provide a unique opportunity to bridge the gap between veterinary and medical perspectives regarding zoonotic and food-borne diseases. The productivity and sustainability of crop-livestock systems will be increased through improving the animal feed value of residues from major crops and the targeted use of forages. • Case studies from Ethiopia about feeding practices, nutritional status and morbidity in children, and on the role of livestock keeping and use of animal-source foods completed and preliminary results reported • Priority health risks associated with cattle/dairy production in Nigeria described and quantified in project reports, and mitigation strategies developed in consultation with stakeholders • Relationship between laboratory fodder traits and livestock productivity determined, superior dual purpose cultivars identified and NIRS equations established for cowpea, maize and rice • Synthesis of approaches for determining and targeting appropriate options to address farmer needs for improved feed resources and feeding strategies completed and reported (with project 1) • Fodder value of crop residue considered under the \"added value\" concept in varietal releasing process in sorghum and pearl millet • Information about exploitable variations in fodder value of the crop residues available to crop improvement, varietal releasing agents and seed industry for groundnut and pigeonpea • At least one third of the accessions in forage genebank assessed for seed quality • Basic data for SINGER verified on 15,000 forage accessions • A forage image database developed using least 500 images • Synthesis of information on a range of multi-stakeholder partnerships appropriate for scaling up and out of fodder innovations in 3 production systems in each Nigeria and India completed and report distributed (with project 2)• Synthesis paper on options to improve water productivity through livestock mediated strategies written and distributed • Policy recommendations formulated indicating implications of R&D options in Nile basin with respect to targeting of improved livestock and water management options • One high profile book on pastoralism and wildlife in East Africa in final draft • One global synthesis of the effects of intensification and loss of scale in rangelands in final draft • Five policy briefs on issues relating to land use change completed and distributed • Two assessments on herder-farmer conflicts for West and East Africa available for partners • Role of animal-source foods in the diets and nutritional status of Ethiopian children described in Ph.D. thesis • Econometric analysis of the associations between livestock-keeping, animal-source food expenditure patterns, animal-source food consumption, and child nutritional status characterized in the sample of Ethiopian households reported in Ph.D. thesis • Economic impact assessment of cysticercosis in eastern and southern Africa completed, reported and a peer-review publication for an integrated framework drafted • Methodology for evaluating the incidence and impact of zoonotic and food-borne diseases affecting the poor in representative livestock production systems developed and tested • Priority health risks associated with principal urban livestock production systems in Kigali described and quantified in project reports, and mitigation strategies developed in consultation with stakeholders • Capacity to support pig R&D strengthened in Eastern and Southern Africa through graduate students (7 Masters and 2 PhD) and on-the-job training among veterinary research and laboratory staff in 4 countries • Information about exploitable variations in fodder value of the crop residues available to crop improvement, varietal releasing agents and seed industry for cowpea maize and rice • Year round on-farm and purchased fodder resources quantified and quality established for selected NDDB-associated dairy cooperatives in India and appropriate supplementation strategies developed • Duplicate collection of key forage species located in another appropriate institute • Seed quality of all forage genebank accessions determined • General training materials and forage fact sheets for at least 20 best bet forages for management and seed multiplication developed and translated into local languages in 2 countries (with project 2) • At least 300 farmers and NARES partners trained in forage and forage seed production technologies Users-Farmers, development agents, NARS, veterinary and public health agencies; policy makers and researchers A synthesis of options and approaches to improve the contribution of livestock and their products especially for strategic at-risk groups among the poor is available and used for development efforts by stakeholders in at least three countries in SSA Approaches for the diagnosis and strategies to reduce the risk of zoonoses in periurban livestock systems are available and used by NARS and other partners in smallholder livestock production systems Diagnostic tools and control strategies for cysticercosis, including biophysical and policy options are being used by consortia of partners in at least four countries in SSA Awareness raised about role of key animal-sourced micronutrients at critical stages of child growth increased in the scientific literature and through nutrition education messages, and consumption of animal-sourced micronutrients increased in at least one intervention site in SSA Ex ante assessment of a range of food-feed crops is available and used by ILRI and partners to target research on feeds and feeding strategies in three countriesRecommendations are available to international and national partners involved in crop breeding and livestock production that enable targeted development and utilisation of feed options in five countries ILRI forage genebank is used as a strategic resource for fodder material and linked to partners working at field level in at least four countries An approach to target forage strategies and options that encompasses essential aspects of the research to development continuum, including seed and delivery systems is available and being used by partners in at least five countries Universities, NARES, policy makers and NGOs recognise and respond to the need to strengthen livestock and water research and management capacity.Partners' give high priority to capacity building.Financial and other resources are available.CPWF and/or other funding in place to enable project implementation.Hotspots have been identified.Communities consider livestock-water interactions a priority and are willing to collaborateAgreements among key stakeholders established and honoured.Budgets approved and funds made available; ILRI and partners' personnel committed to the research.Identification and assignment of thesis candidates.Approved budget in place.Approved budget in place.Hotspot report available.Community level agreements for collaboration in place. • A joint strategy and functional forum to enhance the effectiveness of the CGIAR system to address the global research needs of small scale crop-livestock producers. • Improved cultivars and management practices of food-feed crops with superior grain yield and feed value suitable for the main crop-livestock systems in areas of high rural poverty developed, evaluated and made available through collaborative research with NARS and other partners.• Synthesis of strategies and management options from the consortium partners for the integrated and sustainable use of land, water, soil nutrients and livestock in mixed crop-livestock systems were rural poverty is high, natural resources are degrading and crop-livestock production systems are intensifying, developed, tested and made available.• Synthesis of policy and institutional options from the consortium partners to increase productivity of crop-livestock farms and promote market access of small-scale farmers made available to policy/decision makers.• An internet based resource to share information on the development of sustainable crop-livestock systems made accessible to the general public.This research will provide options to increase the productivity, market opportunities and household livelihoods in small-scale crop-livestock production systems in the poorest regions of Asia, LAC, SSA and WANA. A major impact focus is on improved use of feed resources, particularly through the breeding, dissemination and widespread adoption of improved food-feed crops, that maximize both grain quality and quantity for human food and food value and quantity for livestock feed. These improvements will be conducted within a broader natural resource management context to maintain and enhance system sustainability.• • A strategy to address priority global needs of poor small scale crop-livestock producers revised.• A framework and model for assessing options to overcome feed scarcity and improve livestock productivity in food-feed systems developed and validated. • Genetic and environmental/management influences on fodder yield and nutritive quality and their relationship with grain yield established for pearl millet and sorghum.• At least three superior genotypes and crop management options for sorghum and pearl millet identified and tested.• Selection criteria and sources of variation for further improvement identified and available to crop breeders for use in improvement programmes of sorghum and pearl millet • Strategies and pathways to scale out fodder technologies identified and implemented in Nigeria and India.• Drivers of intensification of crop-livestock systems identified in case studies conducted in South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America.• Policy and institutional options to improve the access to markets of small-scale farmers in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa synthesized.• Internet based resource to share information on development options fro crop-livestock systems enhanced.• Strategies and pathways to scale out fodder technologies identified and implemented in Nigeria and India. • Genetic and environmental/management influences on fodder yield and nutritive quality and their relationship with grain yield assessed for maize and cowpea.• At least three superior genotypes and crop management options for maize and cowpea identified and tested.• SLP strategy to address key priority global needs of poor small scale crop-livestock producers updated. • Genetic and environmental/management influences on fodder yield and nutritive quality and their relationship with grain/tuber yield assessed for rice, sweet potato, pigeon pea.• At least three multi-purpose genotypes and management options for cowpea, rice and pigeon pea identified and tested.• Selection criteria and sources of variation for further improvement identified and available to crop breeders for use in improvement programmes of cowpea, pigeon pea and rice.• Ex-post impact assessment studies of improved food-feed crops initiated for pearl millet and sorghum. At least one institution in each of 5 countries in targeted regions has developed organizational and human resources to improve croplivestock systems.Trends remain on demand for livestock products in developing countries.Crop-livestock integration continues to be the main path for agricultural intensification in poor countries.Demand and production for meat and milk in developing countries grow by more than 3 % annually.More than 75% of the growth in ruminant milk and meat production occurs in mixed crop-livestock systems.Most of the monogastric meat production in areas where poor people can contribute to production and/or supply of inputs. Purpose Through synergies created within the CGIAR system, leveraging resources and adding value to the contribution of individual centers to the CGIAR goal:• NARS and relevant users promote and smallscale crop-livestock producers adopt improved food-feed systems that overcome feed scarcity and increase livestock productivity.• NARS and relevant users promote and smallscale farmers adopt strategies for the sustainable use of land, water and nutrients in crop-livestock systems.• Decision makers, development agents and communities of crop-livestock producers adopt policy and institutional options that improve productivity and sustainability of crop-livestock systems.At least 6 NARS and other development agencies in at least 3 countries located in different regions of high rural poverty promote demonstrably better food-feed systems than those prevailing in 2005 or earlier in at least 3 key crop-livestock systems.At least of 10% of crop-livestock producers adopt improved food-feed systems and better nutrient management practices in at least 6 pilot sites by 2010. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1775161295.json b/main/part_2/1775161295.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..24111c876ea4c4a42404a4b3721a12797bbd543b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1775161295.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"6b8e5865-6472-4434-ba98-02f764423e85","content":"\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1780210246.json b/main/part_2/1780210246.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d903ea1a9286893402bedeb186cde7447ac1d19 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1780210246.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"eceda01367aa06e0a38bf4484315af0b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7d0f9c78-2501-446b-a91a-a3fa968dd3be/retrieve","id":"236465161"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"bf457ed4-5566-401e-b6f3-40cf9d897b54","content":"This brief seeks to help national and provincial policymakers in better managing food safety along the smallholder pig value chain in Vietnam. It proposes costeffective, practical interventions based on the evidence of the research project 'Improving food safety in the smallholder pig value chain in Vietnam', known as PigRISK which ran from 2012 to 2017. It also includes outputs from a policy forum attended by policymakers from Hung Yen and Nghe An provinces in August 2017 and reflections from the last PigRISK project workshop in September 2017 in Hanoi.• Biological contamination is the main cause of health risks, while chemical-associated hazards are less important. Enhancing risk communications is critical to improving the ways that related agencies inform the public of health risks. • Strengthening hygiene practices along the pig value chain through the provision of training and clear guidelines plays an equally important role to infrastructure investment. More attention should be paid to improving hygiene practices to ensure food safety. However, behavioural change requires the provision of incentives. • Interventions also need to target consumers to manage the risk of cross-contamination at household level when handling pork. • High disease burden (17%) due to the consumption of Salmonella contaminated pork requires better reporting mechanisms and surveillance systems for food-borne diseases at all levels. value chain. Ensuring food safety is a top priority for Vietnam, especially in the context of changing food consumption patterns and ineffective risk communication.Although pork supplied by smallholders, including that from wet markets is affordable and can meet local demand, the quality and hygiene standards are difficult to control effectively. Smallholder pig value chains are vulnerable to breakdowns in food safety. However, research by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and partners shows that these systems can be efficient and effectively deliver safe pork if appropriate risk management approaches and policies are developed and implemented.In Vietnam, most pigs-76%-are processed in small slaughter facilities and sold in wet markets which often have inadequate conditions for pork processing and handling. Infrastructural improvements are needed, and more attentions should be paid to improving hygiene practices.Although Vietnam has a modern food safety regulatory framework, with controls which are rigorously applied to exported food, existing legislation and policy does not adequately support domestic pork consumption. Moreover, Vietnam's regulatory system is not fully riskbased in nature, leading to ineffective risk communication.PigRISK studies were conducted to provide evidence on health risks, impact and possible mitigation options. Some key findings, which have been validated through participatory consultations with key stakeholders, are listed below.PigRISK studies show that while biological hazards present the most important risk, consumers tend to be more concerned with chemical contamination of pork. Microbial risks through improper hygiene and crosscontamination are likely to cause most food safety concerns and health impacts.Researchers found high levels of contamination on pork with Salmonella present in 44% of pork sold at markets in two studied areas: Hung Yen and Nghe An provinces.Research showed that the health risks due to chemical hazards in pork in Hung Yen and Nghe An provinces seemed less serious than what was recently communicated to the public on the mass media; almost none of the samples exceeded the current maximum residue limits.A risk assessment estimated the annual risk of salmonellosis due to consumption of cooked pork for consumers in studied provinces to be 17%; this means that every year 2 in 10 consumers are at risk of becoming ill yearly from pork-related salmonellosis. Much of the human health risk comes from crosscontamination when handling pork at household level, for example, using the same cutting board. However, consumers have the perception that household practices, such as the rinsing of pork with water and cooking well, can sufficiently reduce the impact of any possible microbial contamination.In the context of food safety, a hazard is defined as a substance (biological, chemical, physical) present in food that has the potential to cause an adverse health effect in consumers.Risk is the likelihood that a person might be harmed if exposed to a given hazard. Risks in food safety usually refer to the likelihood and consequences of events.An economic assessment of the cost of human illness due to pork-related salmonellosis was conducted as part of PigRISK. . Researchers found that the cost per treatment and per day of hospitalization due to foodborne diarrhoea were USD 106.9 and USD 33.6, respectively, amounting to USD 2.5-7.6 million annually in Vietnam for hospitalization alone.The following are some of the policy recommendations based on research findings from the project and consultation with policymakers in the two provinces.Investment in livestock production including food safety should be more focused. The state budget currently finances too many development objectives with a wide range of beneficiaries, reducing the efficiency of the spending.The current policy on slaughterhouses should prioritize good practices and behavioural change of related actors, promoting the adoption of hygienic practices rather than only focusing on infrastructural improvements. Greater awareness of the benefits of behavioural changes and incentives for the adoption of good practices are needed.Improved risk communications requires the development of a food safety communication strategy and better collaboration among relevant state agencies and other actors to deliver practical and coherent food safety messages to the public. Future interventions should target consumers to manage the risk of cross-contamination at household level when handling pork.Further support is needed to increase the adoption of good animal husbandry practices (GAHP) by smallholders and establish pig breeding groups to better link farmers to markets and improve food safety along the value chain.It is advised to strengthen national food safety monitoring and surveillance, including the improvement of traceability along the pig value chain."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1802925783.json b/main/part_2/1802925783.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34db850d633678f262308f6f835e049db1db5dc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1802925783.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4056c3c69c4f529ce871723b7f58262c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/dad163b0-d84d-4b78-89f9-0842540da13b/retrieve","id":"-1332362117"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"dce5ac88-3b2f-41f4-9ecb-1d0eed94c95e","content":"Aflatoxin levels in individual samples of a feed-type varied, but tended to be higher for particular feeds (see graph) The percentage of feed samples that were above the WHO recommended limit for aflatoxin in animal feed (of 5ppb) was high in commonly used feeds, for example 96% for ground-nut cake, 80% for millet bran, and 69% for concentrate. Some feed samples had aflatoxin levels high enough to potentially affect milk safety and livestock productivity, indicating the need to further monitor both feeds and milk"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1818056661.json b/main/part_2/1818056661.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0f0c8fc2e0701ed1db74131cd3f045fbe0cb003 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1818056661.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"d78d2d77-9d6a-409f-a378-db60fa169ee8","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1822676179.json b/main/part_2/1822676179.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4355edaa11b6aba87f5606be220ba75d3f511b50 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1822676179.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"aeac7463d7caafed7c21f2fc608b3230","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/eafa61ee-17d3-4548-9a23-cdae492a391c/content","id":"-2091627669"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1d88a4fb-07aa-4775-bfd9-2255bc3c4c58","content":"In the aggregate, the promise of staple crops value chains in Africa can be deduced from recent reports, which indicate that food markets in sub-Saharan Africa are projected to grow exponentially in the coming decades. Modern value chains with dependable and transparent information systems, quality standards, storage facilities, supportive financial (credit) and other services are important if expanding food markets brought about by urbanization will turn into successful agribusiness and development opportunity.The study Market surveys were carried out in 2013 under the Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume Cropping Systems for Food Security in Eastern and Southern Africa (SIMLESA). Despite the potential of African agricultural markets to capture the demands of a growing urban consumer class, the evidence base on the performance of these markets is still relatively thin. It is therefore important to document the emerging trends to identify opportunities (and impediments) to the growth and development of modern value chains in these staple crops markets. Evidence of modernization and structured trade was summarized in terms of the following parameters: The existence of impersonal exchange, contract-based transactions, price information systems, standardization and quality differentiation.The survey was done among maize and legume traders in Kenya and Ethiopia. These markets were selected to coincide with the catchment markets for maize and legumes in the zones where CIMMYT and partners implemented the SIMLESA project.The project focuses on generating information on production options, value chains and policy ideas that can be used by farmers, extension agencies, development organizations, and agribusinesses along the maize-legume value chains in a comprehensive package to achieve sustainable intensification. The markets covered by the survey in both countries are listed in Fig. 1 below. In total 275 and 106 maize and/or legume traders were interviewed in Ethiopia and Kenya respectively. This section highlights the results of the survey in the two countries under four categories aforementioned -the existence of impersonal exchange, contract-based transactions, price information systems, standardization and quality differentiation. The aim is to show frequency of contract-based transactions compared to spot markets, the availability of auxiliary services from market intermediaries, the nature of the price dissemination system and the grading and quality assessment system.Limited contract-based transactions is likely to imply the predominance of spot markets. In both Kenya and Ethiopia, the survey found that majority of traders operated within a limited locality: 72% to 95% of maize and legume traders operate primarily in local villages and towns. (Table 1). This situation could be as a result of the nature of many businesses that are small and micro.Secondly, as shown in Table 2 below, transactions based on contracts were absent in both tradersupplier or trader-buyer relationships. The evidence of few contract-based transactions may be symptomatic of unstructured transactions in many maize and legume markets in both countries. The localized nature of many of businesses suggests that local traders are not be able to exploit markets further afield compared to other intermediaries. The second trend revealed by the survey was that the localized nature of grain markets is accompanied by limited market services reaching farmers from traders. This is a significant finding because farmers are the traders' main suppliers. Consider the fact that the main suppliers to the traders were mostly farmers with wholesalers and rural assemblers or business partners the second largest category (Table 3). As per fig. 2, only a minority of traders offered any of the services that may support greater and structured participation of farmers in maize and legume markets. Limited formal price information systemModern markets rely on equitable information access provided through publicly accessible common outlets. In many places in Kenya and Ethiopia there are limited formal public price information systems. As per Fig. 3, for many traders, conversations with fellow traders was the main source of market information. Alternatively, the price was known at the market place. The latter is a feature of spot markets. The thrust being that gathering market price information is mainly a private undertaking for traders. A publicly accessible price information system appears exceptional rather than the norm in both countries.In terms of price discovery and settlement, the results showed the predominant price settlement for the traders (74% in Ethiopia and 44% in Kenya)was through negotiations between traders and their business partners (sellers or buyers). Just about 38% of traders relied on common-knowledge market prices during the transaction to pay farmers in both eastern and western regions of Kenya. In Ethiopia 23% of the traders relied on published prices by trader associations. An important issue is that in the absence of standardized quality determination and arbitration, prices in informal market systems are often not based on quality differentials. This is because the various \"grades\" are not openly known nor are they assessed using standardized procedures. In many markets in Kenya and Ethiopia, grading and standardization are limited to the buyer making visual inspection during the buying process. The result is lack of standardization which means that the prices charged are impossible to compare on the basis of quality differentiation.Figure 5 below shows 16 different attributes that different traders considered when purchasing maize or legumes and these were graded as \"very important\" in affecting prices. In each case no attribute was considered by more than 12% of the traders in either country. Without a common and widely accepted minimum set of attributes, which set the quality and price of maize, it may be difficult to develop systems like group marketing, warehouse receipt systems and commodity exchanges. For example if farmers are to form marketing groups to bulk and transport to the larger markets, their members must bring together grain of fairly uniform and specific quality as demanded by the market. Without a common set of standards the arrangement is likely to collapse. Implications: Will value chains modernization always a good thing?Will the development of contracting and other formalisms always lead to equitable outcomes for smallholder market participation? Where willingness to pay is dictated by consumer preferences, markets will pay the price for higher quality products while producers will decide their willingness to participate in these structured markets based on cost-benefit analysis. It is possible to strike a middle ground with those able to achieve the demands of premium markets and those able to serve the low income market segments. The equity implications of this scenario are not immediately obvious.Conclusions and lessons for sustainable intensification research in SIMLESA Phase 2The fact that the elements of structured grain markets are largely missing in maize and legume markets in Ethiopia and Kenya suggests that there are few viable business opportunities in these formalized systems, otherwise businesses would have developed around them. Moreover, the dynamism of the less structured markets with their low entry barriers, offer a more levelled playing field for many small traders and farmers to participate in these markets. The flexibility of less structured markets in meeting diverse consumers' needs and preferences must be emphasized. On balance, the advantages of more structured markets are not straightforward nor not a forgone conclusion.This survey highlights three important issues for policy on value chain development and for further research: First, price information systems based on widely accepted quality definitions are needed in maize-legume value chains to support quality based pricing. Second, agricultural market development policy should focus on improving infrastructure for auxiliary services such as, forward sales, transportation, post-harvest handling and grading. Third, options for reducing the length of value chains or enabling farmers to be more fully integrated into wider markets should be explored. Fourth, future research should focus on determining the key financial efficiency and development gains from such measures as standardized grades and quality, contracting and vertical integration."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1826405517.json b/main/part_2/1826405517.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e50b9f15bbdb0685da7adff6cbc3dbedf616e5ab --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1826405517.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"efe6d0a520288659507439d69668feda","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c75bba9e-5879-423d-9d0a-ca10b7a13aa7/retrieve","id":"-1262282913"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"455bd929-6dc2-47bf-a079-5e0108dd6ef2","content":"Own production contributes much of the food supply in smallholder production systems in low-and middle-income countries like Ethiopia. Understanding the potential as well as constraints of these production systems in terms of nutrient supplies is thus a critical step to design interventions to improve nutrient intakes. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the usual total intakes of vitamin A, iron and zinc among rural children and (2) to investigate whether the intakes these nutrients areassociated with differences in the dominant farming systems between spatial clusters. Using nationally representative intake data of 4,902 children 6-35 months of age, usual intake and the proportion of inadequate intakes of vitamin A, iron and zinc were calculated. A multi-level model was used to examine the association between individual-level and cluster-level variables with the usual total dietary intakes of these nutrients. The diet was dominated by starchy foods. Consumption of animal source foods, vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables was low. We found a high prevalence of inadequate intake of vitamin A and zinc (85.4% and 49.5%, respectively). Relatively, low prevalence of inadequate intake of iron (8.4%) was reported. The spatial farming systems diversity across the rural clusters explained 48.2%, 57.2% and 26.7% of the observed variation in the usual total dietary intakes of vitamin A, iron and zinc, respectively. Our findings indicated the importance of farming system diversity at the landscape level as one of the determinant factors for individual usual total dietary intakes of vitamin A, iron and zinc.cluster farming system, Ethiopia, micronutrient, nutrient adequacy, rural, usual intakeMicronutrients, comprising both minerals and vitamins, are essential for growth and development of the human body. During the first 2 years of childhood, micronutrient requirements are high, and inadequate intake during this period could result in deficiencies leading to high susceptibility to infection and mortality, limited cognitive and physical development and reduced productivity during adulthood (Biesalski & Black, 2016;Biesalski & Jana, 2018;Salgueiro et al., 2002) Globally, micronutrient deficiencies are widespread, and yet the largest proportion of children with key micronutrient deficiencies lives in low and middle-income countries (Bailey et al., 2015;Bhutta & Salam, 2012;Ramakrishnan, 2002). In Ethiopia, children living in rural areas are the most at risk for commonly occurring micronutrient deficiencies, such as iron, vitamin A and zinc due to high level of poverty, food insecurity and intestinal parasitic infections (Desalegn et al., 2014;Gebreegziabher et al., 2020), and the magnitude of the problem varies considerably across the different administrative regions (Ethiopian Public Health Institute, 2016).In the context of developing countries, poor diet quality compounded with low bioavailability is often a major determinant of micronutrient deficiencies (Beal et al., 2017;Gibbs et al., 2011;Gibson et al., 1998). To alleviate micronutrient deficiencies, cereal-based complementary foods are usually given to breast fed children in Ethiopia. However, these traditional cereal-based complementary foods are mostly calorie-rich and insufficient in key micronutrients to meet the daily requirements (Abeshu et al., 2016;Baye et al., 2013).Thus, improving the quality and diversity of diets has been recommended as major strategies to improve micronutrient intakes (Arsenault et al., 2013;Muslimatun & Wiradnyani, 2016;Zhang et al., 2016). However, the success of this strategy is related to the availability and accessibility of foods, which largely depend on the food production system (Girard et al., 2012;Thamilini et al., 2019).The food production pathway is the most direct agriculturenutrition pathway by which own production translates into consumption (Gillespie et al., 2019). However, two contrasting views have been documented on the relationship between production diversity and diet from previous studies conducted in low-and middle-income countries. The first view argues that on-farm production diversity was consistently associated with increased household dietary diversity in smallholder farmer households (Ecker, 2018;Jones, 2017;Jones et al., 2014;Romeo et al., 2016). The second view argues that market access had a strong association than on-farm production diversity to increase household dietary diversity (Koppmair et al., 2016;Sibhatu et al., 2015). However, the evidence underlying the relationship from both views has the following limitations:(1) research has focused at the household level and overlooked the status of the most vulnerable member of the household, and (2) nutrient intakes were repeatedly measured using a proxy indicator (via dietary diversity score) which is limited to show the status of a specific nutrient of interest. In Ethiopia, given the dependency of rural households on agricultural production for sustaining their livelihoods, exploring the local context from the nutrition perspective could help to identify the problem as well as options to address the risk for the different micronutrient deficiencies among rural children who are already the most at risk. Ethiopia is characterized by diverse topography and agro-climatic features that determine the production systems. A thoughtful understanding of the farming systems diversity across the rural areas will provide a framework to explore and design agricultural interventions for improving nutritional outcomes, particularly diets. Hence, the current analysis attempts to investigate the extent to which farming systems diversity, as defined by spatial classification of landscapes into a broadly 'distinct' patterns of farming systems, are correlated with usual total intake of vitamin A, iron and zinc among rural children in Ethiopia using a multi-level analysis approach. We hypothesized that (1) clusters (landscapes) with simplified (less diverse) farming system would be associated with high inadequate nutrient intake, and (2) the spatial farming system diversity is associated with the variability in nutrient intake.This analysis was conducted using data from the national food consumption survey (NFCS) in Ethiopia. The NFCS was a crosssectional survey where a nationally and regionally representative sample of children 6 to 35 months of age was randomly selected from the different administrative regions. The survey used a multistage sampling design to ensure collection of dietary information from the range of different ethnic, geographic, socioeconomic and cultural settings. The country was stratified into nine geographical regions (Afar, Tigray, Amhara, Oromiya, Gambella, Benshangul Gumuz, Southern Nations and Nationalities and Peoples' [SNNP], Somalia and Harari) and two administrative cities (Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa). Then, each region was stratified into urban and rural areas or clusters. In the first stage of sampling, enumeration areas (EAs) or clusters composed of mainly rural and fewer urban areas were selected using probability proportion to EA or cluster size in each region. In the second stage, about 20 to 26 households per EA or cluster were selected using a simple random sampling technique.Initially, the data consisted of a sample of 6,703 children from a total of 319 clusters. However, we excluded urban clusters due to the fact that urban clusters do not depend on their own production for consumption. We then focused our analysis on a total of 4,902 children from 228 rural clusters (Figure 1). Household demographic and socioeconomic information was retrieved from the NFCS and included in the analysis. Detailed information on the survey methodology was published elsewhere (Ethiopian Public Health Institute, 2013).• The diet of rural children in Ethiopia is limited in diversity to provide adequate intake of vitamin A, iron and zinc.• The spatial variability in vitamin A, iron and zinc inadequacy is mostly associated with farming system features.• Understanding the local context in rural setting is crucial to explore and design nutrition sensitive and other complementary interventions that address micronutrient malnutrition.Dietary data on the type and amount of food consumed by a child in the previous day were collected using a multi-pass single 24-h recall method (Gibson & Ferguson, 2008). The interview was administered by trained data collectors, and the mother or caregiver of the child was the respondent. A detailed description of the method of data collection is found elsewhere (Ethiopian Public Health Institute, 2013).Nutrient intakes, such as vitamin A, iron and zinc from foods consumed, were calculated using the Ethiopian food composition table part III and part IV (EHNRI, 1998a(EHNRI, , 1998b)). Only nutrients contributed from food sources were considered in this analysis.The farming systems data for each cluster were obtained primarily from the Famine Early Warning System Network (FEWS NET; https:// fews.net) and IFPRI's Harvest Choice (https://harvestchoice.org/ products/data) databases, where clusters were classified based on the dominant pattern of farm activities and livelihoods using expert knowledge approach. Furthermore, available literature sources were referred to complement the existing data on farming systems (Amede et al., 2017). Based on those resources, a total of 10 farming systems were identified for the study clusters: agro-pastoral, highland maize mixed, highland barley-wheat mixed, highland perennial, highland teff mixed, lowland sesame mixed, pastoral, sorghum-chat mixed, sorghum mixed and western-lowland maize mixed. The farming system dominating a cluster is denoted as 'cluster farming system' (Figure 2). Moreover, cluster level data on food security were compiled from FEWS NET and included in the analysis.Usual nutrient intake estimation for a population of interest require a repeated 24-h dietary recall on at least a sub-sample of the population in order to account for within-person variability. However, the Ethiopian national food consumption survey was a single 24-h recall data, and a statistical adjustment using an external variance estimate from a repeated nationally representative dietary intake survey (in our case from Uganda) for a similar target group was made on the dataset to estimate the usual intake. The statistical adjustment was done using a 1-day method developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Institute for Global Nutrition at the University of California, Davis (Luo et al., 2019) to estimate F I G U R E 1 Flow chart showing the clusters and study participants included in the study the usual total intake of vitamin A, iron and zinc. The method uses two SAS macros: TRAN1 and DISTRIB. The TRAN1 macro is used to generate parameter estimates for nutrients consumed every day by the majority of individuals after covariate adjustment for a day of the week using a Box-Cox transformation. Parameter estimates from TRAN1 were further used as input for the DISTRIB macro to estimate the distribution of usual intake via a Monte Carlo simulation. For each nutrient intake estimation, separate TRAN1 and DISTRIB macros were used.Adequacy of nutrients was assessed using the estimated average requirements (EARs; the average daily nutrient intake level estimated to meet the requirements of half of the population of healthy individuals) as defined by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group (IZiNCG) for vitamin A and zinc, respectively, according to sex and age.Accordingly, the prevalence of inadequacy was estimated as the Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group, 2019). The EAR cut-off point method was not used for iron since the distribution of iron requirement among children is skewed. Thus, we used the fullprobability approach proposed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) adjusted for an iron bioavailability of 10% (World Health Organization, 2006). These three dietary reference values set by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) for vitamin A, International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group (IZiNCG) for zinc and World Health Organization (WHO) for iron was chosen due to its wide range of use in the context of developing countries. Considering the local food preparation and processing practices (e.g., fermentation for cereals-based foods) which reduces the absorption inhibitors (e.g., phytate) (Abebe et al., 2007;Umeta et al., 2005), bioavailability adjustment for iron at 10% and zinc at 30% were set to estimate the prevalence of inadequacy of intake of these nutrients (International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group, 2019;World Health Organization, 2006).A dietary diversity score (DDS) was calculated for each child by categorizing individual foods consumed in quantities ≥10 g in the previous 24 h into the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) seven food groups (World Health Organization, 2010). Though the use of the minimum threshold (≥10 g) has not yet been tested in Ethiopia, the use of this threshold is recommended to exclude foods that are consumed in small amount and has been tested in other developing countries. Using this threshold improved the performance of the dietary diversity score in predicting adequate micronutrient intakes (Daniels et al., 2009;Kennedy et al., 2007;Mahmudiono et al., 2020).Accordingly, a child with DDS of four food groups or more is categorized as a low-risk for micronutrients inadequacy (Kennedy et al., 2007).The analysis was started by exploring the distribution of the data.Accordingly, quantitative response variables (vitamin A, iron and zinc intakes) were checked for normality using a histogram. In the case of non-normality, square root transformation method was used. The transformed variables were tested and confirmed for normality and constant variance, and therefore, the ANOVA estimates are reliable.Then, normally distributed data were presented as means and standard deviations (SD), whereas for skewed distribution, we presented medians (interquartile range). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square test were used to compare the mean DDS and the minimum food group consumption between cluster farming systems, respectively. Sample weight was applied for descriptive values, such as proportions and averages (e.g., mean DDS).At individual-level, information on sex, age and food groups consumed were available for each selected child in the household. However, because maternal and household related factors greatly affect the nutritional status of a child in the household, we considered maternal education status, total household size and household socioeconomic status as additional individual-level factors in the modelling process. To examine the association between individual-level variables and cluster-level variables such as farming systems and food security with the usual total dietary intake of vitamin A, iron and zinc among rural children, we used multi-level models with parameter estimation using the maximum likelihood technique. A two-level random intercept linear model was used in the analysis by adjusting for individual-level variables (child age, child sex, household socioeconomic status and caretaker or mother educational status) and clusterlevel variables (farming system and food security status) in subsequent models. Accordingly, in Model 1 (null model), neither the individuallevel nor the cluster-level variables were included. Individual-level variables were included in Model 2, whereas cluster-level variables were included in Model 3. Lastly, both individual-and cluster-level variables were included in Model 4. Measures of association between individual-level variables, cluster-level variables with the specified micronutrient intakes were presented as regression coefficients in the fixed part of the model, whereas the cluster level variability was presented as the 'intra-class correlation' and percentage change in variance in the random effect part of the model. The statistical level of significance was set at p < 0.05.Using variable names:Mixed model:where Y ij = dependent variable (nutrient intake) measured for child i in cluster j; CAge ij = age of child i in cluster j; CSex ij = sex of child i in cluster j; SES ij = household socio-economic status of child i in cluster j; MEdu ij = mother educational status of child i in cluster j;CIFar j = type of farming system in cluster j; ClFoSec j = food security status in cluster j; β 0j = intercept for the jth cluster; β 1j , β 2j , β 3j , β 4j = regression coefficient associated with X ij for jth cluster;γ 00 = overall mean intercept; γ 01 , γ 02 = regression coefficient associated with cluster level variables; γ 10 , γ 20 , γ 30 , γ 40 = overall slope adjusted for cluster level variables; ϵ ij = random error and μ 0j = random effects at cluster j adjusted for cluster level variables on the intercept.The survey was ethically approved by Scientific and Ethical Review Office (SERO) committee of Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute. Informed consent was obtained from caregivers who were interviewed.The general characteristics of the study participants and the clusters included in this study are summarized in Table 1. Childrenwere not equally distributed among cluster farming systems (e.g., the majority were from the highland barley-wheat mixed cluster farming system [24.3%]), whereas few were from the lowland sesame mixed cluster farming system (1.0%). A large proportion of mothers or caregivers were illiterate (72.0%) and from poor households (57.6%).Across the cluster farming systems, children had a very low diet diversity score (about an average of 2), and more than 90% had below the recommended minimum intake of four or more food groups per day (Table 2; World Health Organization, 2010). The diets were dominated by energy-rich staples such as cereals, roots and tubers irrespective of the diversity of farming systems (Figure 3). The contribution of other food groups differed between cluster farming systems. For instance, the staple diets were primarily supplemented with dairy products in pastoral and agro-pastoral farming systems, legumes in cereal dominated farming systems (highland maize mixed, highlandbarley-wheat mixed, highland-teff mixed, lowland-sesame mixed and sorghum mixed) and vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables in highland perennial and Western-lowland maize mixed farming systems. The contribution of flesh foods and eggs were generally very low (Figure 3).The usual total dietary intake (as expressed in median) of vitamin A in children in the different cluster farming systems was below the estimated average requirement (EAR), as shown in Table 3. Nevertheless, a considerable difference in the usual total dietary intake of vitamin A was observed across the cluster farming systems. In particular, children from pastoral, agro-pastoral, highland perennial and Westernlowland maize mixed cluster farming systems had a usual total dietary vitamin A intake of more than twice as high as that of their counterparts from cereal dominated cluster farming systems, such as lowland sesame mixed, sorghum mixed and highland barley-wheat mixed. Due to a low usual total dietary intake of vitamin A in clusters with cereal dominated farming systems, more than 80% of children residing in those clusters were unable to meet the requirement for vitamin A from their diet. By contrast, the highest usual total dietary intake of vitamin A was reported for children from clusters dominated by pastoral, agro-pastoral, highland perennial and Western-lowland maize mixed farming systems. However, the proportion of children living in those clusters with inadequate vitamin A intake remained high (ranging from 75.0% to 79.3%).Usual total dietary intake of iron was generally high across the different cluster farming systems. However, relatively intake for children from clusters with pastoral and agro-pastoral farming systems was lower compared to the other clusters. As a result, a significant proportion of children living in those two cluster farming systems had a higher prevalence of inadequacy for iron (Table 3). By contrast, low usual total dietary intake of zinc was commonly found across the cluster farming systems. However, children living in highland perennial farming systems had the highest prevalence of inadequacy for zinc.Tables 4-6 present the multi-level linear regression model analysis results that examine the association between individual-level variables and cluster-level variables with the usual total dietary intake of F I G U R E 3 Proportion (%) of daily food group intake of rural children by cluster farming system in Ethiopia, NFCS 2011 vitamin A, iron and zinc among rural children. Based on the null models intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) results, 73.0%, 31.0% and 24.2% of the variation in the usual total dietary intake of vitamin A, iron and zinc, respectively, were attributed to the difference between clusters (Model 1; Tables 4-6).In the subsequent models, we added individual-and clusterlevel variables to assess their relationship with usual total dietary intakes of nutrients and explain the variation across the clusters.Among the individual-level variables, child age, sex and household socioeconomic status were associated with the usual total dietary intake of vitamin A, iron and zinc (Model 2; Tables 4-6). The association remained unchanged when controlling for cluster-level variables (Model 4; Tables 4-6). Consumption of an optimum number of food groups (four and more food groups) had a significant positive effect on the usual total dietary intake of iron and zinc, but not on vitamin A intake (Model 2). In contrast, maternal education status and household size had no significant effect on the usual total dietary intakes of vitamin A, iron and zinc (Models 2 and 4;Tables 4-6). The inclusion of these individual-level variables in the model explained 2.8%, 7.0% and 6.7% of the variation observed in the usual total dietary intakes of vitamin A, iron and zinc, respectively (Model 2; Tables 4-6).Although the usual total dietary intakes of vitamin A and zinc were generally low (Table 3), the diversity of farming systems observed at clusters contributed significantly to differences in the usual intakes and explained majorly the observed variation. For instance, compared to pastoral cluster farming system, children from clusters dominated by highland maize mixed, highland barley-wheat mixed, highland teff mixed, lowland sesame mixed, sorghum-chat mixed and sorghum mixed farming systems had a significantly lower usual total dietary intake of vitamin A (Model 3; Table 4). There was no difference observed in the usual total dietary intake of vitamin A between pastoral, agro-pastoral, highland perennial and Western lowland maize mixed cluster farming systems. However, vitamin A intake for children from highland perennial and Western lowland maize mixed cluster farming systems was numerically lower than children from pastoral cluster farming systems. The diversity of farming systems across the rural clusters, where these sampled children reside, explained about half (48.2%) of the variation observed in the usual total dietary intake of vitamin A among children. Cluster-level food security did not affect the usual total dietary intake of vitamin A (Table 4).Likewise, the usual total dietary intake of iron was significantly different between clusters with different farming systems and the observed trend seems quite the opposite in pattern (positively for iron) compared to the influence of cluster farming systems had on the usual total dietary intake of vitamin A (Model 3; Tables 4 and 5). More than half (57.2%) of the variation observed in the usual total dietary intake of iron among children was explained by differences in dominating farming systems in clusters (Table 5). Cluster-level food security was associated with usual total dietary intake of iron (Model 3; Table 5), but the association was lost in a fully adjusted model (Model 4; Table 5). T A B L E 3 Usual intake and prevalence of inadequate intake of vitamin A, iron and zinc among rural children by cluster farming system in Ethiopia, NFCS 2011 The usual total dietary intake of zinc was less affected by the dominant farming systems in clusters. About one fourth (26.7%) of the variation observed was explained by the differences in dominant farming systems in clusters (Table 6). The association was significantly varied across cluster farming systems. In particular, in most cereal dominated systems (highland-barley-wheat mixed, highland-teff mixed, lowland-sesame mixed and sorghum mixed), children tended to have a higher usual total dietary intake of zinc compared to their counterparts from pastoral cluster farming systems (Models 3 and 4;Table 6). On the other hand, children from highland perennial cluster farming systems tended to have a lower usual total dietary intake of zinc compared to children from pastoral cluster farming systems (Models 3 and 4; Table 6). Moreover, the influence of cluster-level food security status on the usual total dietary intake of zinc was significant and consistent in both models (Models 3 and 4; Table 6); which implied children from food-insecure clusters tended to have a higher usual total dietary intake of zinc than children from food secured clusters.Prior attempts made to show the nexus between the food production and consumption in Ethiopia were measured based on indicators such as dietary diversity, energy and nutrient production at the household level (Aweke et al., 2020;Baye et al., 2019;Sibhatu et al., 2015;Tesfaye, 2020). The relationship at the individual level in terms of nutrient intakes remained unknown. This is the first study to our knowledge that estimated individual-level dietary usual total intakes of vitamin A, iron and zinc from nationally representative data of rural children in Ethiopia and further examined the influence of contextual factors associated with intakes of these nutrients. To attain our objectives, we followed an advanced methodological approach (for usual intake estimation and statistical modelling) to determine the adequacy of these nutrients among children and the variability in nutrient intakes attributed to individual-and cluster-level factors.The diverse agro-climatic and ecological conditions of Ethiopia have led farmers to adopt a diverse farming system that fit into the local context to produce foods and generate income to support their livelihoods. Unexpectedly, the dietary pattern was more or less similar across the cluster farming systems except in pastoral and agro-pastoral clusters. The diet of rural children in this analysis was heavily dominated by starchy foods (cereals, roots and tubers) mainly rich in energy and lack animal source foods, which are a good source of micronutrients such as vitamin A, zinc and iron (Murphy & Allen, 2003). However, in pastoral and agro-pastoral cluster farming systems, children's diet constitutes relatively more consumption of animal source foods (e.g., particularly, milk) due to their high dependency on livestock to support their livelihoods (Abegaz et al., 2018;Potts et al., 2019). In general, the monotonous nature of children's diet across the different rural clusters in our analysis might be attributed to seasonality, in our case the time of the survey (May-July), where there were no major harvest in most parts of the country that define food availability and household consumption as previously stated in different studies (Ferro-Luzzi et al., 2001;Hirvonen et al., 2015;Potts et al., 2019;Sibhatu & Qaim, 2017).Although the study covered clusters with diverse farming systems that could potentially produce a variety of foods of both ani- sources were limited to provide adequate vitamin A intake (Demissie et al., 2009;Eshete et al., 2018;Kim et al., 2019).Low prevalence of inadequate intake of iron was observed in the majority of cluster farming systems except for children from pastoral (with a prevalence of 25.6%) and agro-pastoral (with a prevalence of 20.3%) cluster farming systems. Particularly, in cereal dominated cluster farming systems (sorghum mixed, highland teff mixed, highland barley-wheat mixed, lowland sesame mixed, highland maize mixed and sorghum-chat mixed), the reported low inadequacy of iron could be attributed to consumption of unrefined staple grains high in iron (as a result of soil iron contamination during threshing; Guja & Baye, 2018). Although traditional food preparation practice (e.g., fermentation) has the potential to reduce the phytate content, yet phytate intake associated with consumption of unfermented and unrefined cereal-based foods could potentially limit the absorption of iron required by the body.Compared with vitamin A and iron, the prevalence of inadequate usual total dietary zinc intake among children seems 'evenly' distributed across the cluster farming system. In this sense, differences in the prevalence of inadequate usual total dietary zinc intake between clusters farming systems were minimal except in highland perennial clusters. This could be primarily associated with low to negligible consumption of animal source foods between clusters, which are a good source of zinc (Dror & Allen, 2011;Neumann et al., 2002;Zhang et al., 2016). Though rearing livestock is an integral part in most of the clusters farming systems, much of their products are not consumed by the household members.Instead, these products are either sold out to raise income and buy cheaper staple for consumption (Abegaz et al., 2018;Haileselassie et al., 2020) or preserved for special occasions, such as religious holidays and fasting seasons (Abegaz et al., 2018;Haileselassie et al., 2020). Moreover, the availability of zinc for the body may further be affected by consumption of unfermented cereal-based foods high in phytate (Gibson et al., 2010;Umeta et al., 2005).Given the discrepancy between biochemical and dietary based estimate of population nutrient status, we tried to see the harmony between our findings and other national level micronutrient status studies, particularly in rural settings The findings from the regression model showed that usual total dietary intakes of vitamin A, iron and zinc among rural children were associated more with differences in the dominant farming systems between clusters than individual-level factors.Understanding the factors, particularly differences in the dominant farming systems in the country, provides a framework to explore the potential options and constraints to design an intervention to address nutrient inadequacies among children who are the most at-risk groups.The findings of this analysis should be interpreted with some caution considering the strength and limitations of the study design and dataset used. Logistic and resource constraints limited the collection of multiple days dietary intake data from a nationally representative sample of children and the dataset we used were a single 24-h recall which might be affected by within-person and between-person variations. However, we employed an appropriate statistical method to adjust the within-person variation, betweenperson variation and important covariates that may influence intake of micronutrients (e.g., day of the week). Based on this, we estimated the usual total dietary intake distribution to assess the prevalence of inadequate intakes of vitamin A, iron and zinc quantitatively based on nationally representative data. Furthermore, we used a multi-level analysis to determine the factors that influence nutrient intakes of children at individual and cluster levels.These two methodological approaches enabled us to estimate the extent of inadequate intakes of nutrient among children in rural Ethiopia and determined the spatial variability of the problem taking both individual and community factors simultaneously into account. On the other hand, we recognized some of the limitations are worth noting. First, for those children who were breastfed during the survey time, the contribution of breast milk to nutrient intakes was not considered in the analysis, and this probably affected the prevalence of inadequacy among breastfed children.However, given the low breast milk nutrient content among rural mothers in Ethiopia (Z. Abebe et al., 2019;Gebre-Medhin et al., 1976), the reported prevalence estimate is less likely to be overestimated. Second, the NFCS was done during the lean season of Ethiopia (between May and July), and the seasonal food shortage in rural households might affect the consumption and contribute to low nutrient intakes. Third, the individual and cluster level factors included in the model were not exhaustive (e.g., market access) to explain the entire variation observed in nutrient intakes.However, given the time of the survey was carried out, the individual intake estimates would not be significantly affected by household market access. Lastly, the cross-sectional design of the survey did not allow us for a causal interpretation of individual and cluster level factors on the usual total dietary nutrient intakes of children.Household agricultural food production is considered as a direct pathway through which agriculture impact nutrition in terms of access to and availability of food for consumption (Danton & Titus, 2018;Gillespie et al.,2019). Although the current production system considered in this analysis was short of providing adequate micronutrients, the variation in intake of nutrients observed across In conclusion, our findings show that the diets of rural children in Ethiopia were sub-optimal and inadequate to meet the requirements for vitamin A and zinc. Although the usual total dietary intakes of these nutrients were generally low, the differences in intakes observed between clusters dominated by different farming systems was remarkably high. Understanding the association between farming system at the landscape level and inadequate intakes of nutrients among rural children could help to explore interventions that fit into the local context and concomitantly address the nutritional problems."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1861492019.json b/main/part_2/1861492019.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..648e1dfc11b4da824c4d1a5d0f68d28dc38e46ad --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1861492019.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"beb72636c1f5de1d5270a782ac9349c0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a6160fe9-9769-46a6-912f-bb0d0e616a45/retrieve","id":"-1119971487"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5a1ac7e9-e5eb-4d96-8af0-a9d437cfb487","content":"IPGRI now uses the following definitions in genetic resources documentation:Passport descriptors: These provide the basic information used for the general management of the accession (including the registration at the genebank and other identification information) and describe parameters that should be observed when the accession is originally collected.Management descriptors: These provide the basis for the management of accessions in the genebank and assist with their multiplication and regeneration.Environment and site descriptors: These describe the environmental and site-specific parameters that are important when characterization and evaluation trials are held. They can be important for the interpretation of the results of those trials. Site descriptors for germplasm collecting are also included here.Characterization descriptors: These enable an easy and quick discrimination between phenotypes. They are generally highly heritable, can be easily seen by the eye and are equally expressed in all environments. In addition, these may include a limited number of additional traits thought desirable by a consensus of users of the particular crop.Evaluation descriptors: Many of the descriptors in this category are susceptible to environmental differences but are generally useful in crop improvement and others may involve complex biochemical or molecular characterization. They include yield, agronomic performance, stress susceptibilities and biochemical and cytological traits.Characterization will normally be the responsibility of genebank curators, while evaluation will typically be carried out elsewhere (possibly by a multidisciplinary team of scientists). The evaluation data should be fed back to the genebank which will maintain a data file.Minimum highly discriminating descriptors are marked with a star ( « ).The following internationally accepted norms for the scoring, coding and recording of descriptor states should be followed:(a) the Système International d'Unités (SI system) is used. The units to be applied are given in square brackets following the descriptor name;(b) standard colour charts, e.g. Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, Methuen Handbook of Colour, or Munsell Color Chart for Plant Tissues, are strongly recommended for all ungraded colour characters (the precise chart used should be specified in the section where it is used); (d) when a descriptor is scored using a 1-9 scale, such as in (c), '0' would be scored when (i) the character is not expressed; (ii) when a descriptor is inapplicable. In the following example, '0' will be recorded if an accession does not have a central leaf lobe:Linear (e) absence/presence of characters is scored as in the following example:Absence/presence of terminal leaflet 0 Absent 1 (or +) Present (f) blanks are used for information not yet available;(g) for accessions which are not generally uniform for a descriptor (e.g. mixed collection, genetic segregation), the mean and standard deviation could be reported where the descriptor is continuous. Where the descriptor is discontinuous, several codes in the order of frequency could be recorded; or other publicized methods can be utilized, such as R.S. Rana et al. (1991), or van Hintum (1993), that clearly state a method for scoring heterogeneous accessions;(h) dates should be expressed numerically in the format DDMMYYYY, where DD -2 digits to represent the day MM -2 digits to represent the month YYYY -4 digits to represent the year.1.1 Accession number (2.1) This number serves as a unique identifier for accessions and is assigned when an accession is entered into the collection. Once assigned this number should never be reassigned to another accession in the collection. Even if an accession is lost, its assigned number is still not available for re-use. Letters should be used before the number to identify the genebank or national system (e.g. IDG indicates an accession that comes from the genebank at Bari, Italy; CGN indicates an accession from the genebank at Wageningen, The Netherlands; PI indicates an accession within the USA system). Collecting number (1.1) Original number assigned by the collector(s) of the sample, normally composed of the name or initials of the collector(s) followed by a number. This item is essential for identifying duplicates held in different collections. It should be unique and always accompany subsamples wherever they are sent.Collecting date of original sample [DDMMYYYY] (1.3)(1.4) Name of the country in which the sample was collected or bred. Use the three-letter abbreviations from the International Standard (ISO) Codes for the representation of names of countries, No. 3166, 4th Edition. Copies of these are available from DIN: Deutsche Institut für Normung e.V., 10772 Berlin, Germany;Tel. 30-2601Tel. 30- -2860;;Fax 30-2601-1231, Tlx. 184 273-din-d. «Province/State (1.5) Name of the primary administrative subdivision of the country in which the sample was collectedDepartment/County Name of the secondary administrative subdivision (within a Province/State) of the country in which the sample was collectedLocation of collecting site Distance in kilometers and direction from the nearest town, village or map grid reference point (e.g. CURITIBA 7S means 7 km south of Curitiba)Latitude of collecting site (1.8) Degrees and minutes followed by N (North) or S (South) (e.g. 1030S)(1.9) Degrees and minutes followed by E (East) or W (West) (e.g. 07625W)Elevation of collecting site [m asl] (1.7) Estimated slope of the siteThe direction that the slope on which the accession was collected faces. Describe the direction with symbols N, S, E, W (e.g. a slope that faces a southwestern direction has an aspect of SW) Any additional information may be specified here Average of five mature (> node 3 from the terminal bud) leaves, measured at the widest partAverage of five one-year leaves, measured from the base to the insertion with the blade1 Green 2 Dark brown 3 Other (specify in descriptor 6.5 Notes)1 Green 2 Dark brown 3 Other (specify in descriptor 6.5 Notes) In each case, it is important to state the origin of the infestation or infection, i.e. natural, field inoculation, laboratory. Record such information in descriptor 9.5 Notes. These are coded on a susceptibility scale from 1 to 9, viz.:1 Describe any known specific mutant present in the accession"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1861790817.json b/main/part_2/1861790817.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07b30685dcde63cbeb8ed2c1a1be51c54573f628 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1861790817.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a399f228b1b2d0c08b11d2a8c0e626bf","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fee69bd6-b726-4543-8b95-cf83aa28c80c/retrieve","id":"1186998311"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"59b9de22-7e6a-41a8-84d8-0beeb2400fb0","content":"CFR-RFFs provide many benefits. Engaging policymakers, investors and implementers can sustain these benefits through such actions as increasing the capacity and awareness of legal frameworks, aligning with decentralization and securing land titles. These actions also include supporting multiple dimensions of CFR management, such as biophysical conditions, governance, financial sustainability, knowledge dissemination, and adaptation.• Many investments are needed to adapt and scale CFR-RFFs further. These include making training more effective, strengthening capacity, engaging youths and making use of technology as part of CFR management, making periodic biophysical investments, using tools for economic costing and valuation, crafting practical guidelines, and doing research related to biodiversity and climate.Rice field ecosystems make up the majority of the agricultural land in the Lower Mekong region (Ingalls et al. 2018). In Cambodia, WorldFish research found that one hectare of a rice field ecosystem can provide enough wild fish and other aquatic animals to feed 2.6 people for a year (Freed et al. 2020;Hortle 2007). These rice field fisheries (RFFs) provide more than half of the fish that local people consume, and one-third of total inland fish catch nationwide (Freed et al. 2020;FiA 2017). The economic value of RFFs can approach or even exceed the value of a single wet season rice crop (Hortle et al. 2008). In addition, as RFFs are traditionally a common-pool resource during the flood season, they are particularly important for impoverished and landless households. Because of this, management through community fish refuges (CFRs) would ensure that 80 percent (MAFF 2017 and2018) of Cambodia's rice field ecosystems continue to provide these benefits. This brief provides the key lessons and priority research and investments needed to sustain, adapt and scale CFR-RFFs based on WorldFish's 12 years of experience.To make CFRs successful over the long term, policymakers, investors and implementers need to implement the following seven actions: Monitoring and researching these trends could provide a better understanding of the changing conditions, their effects on the socioeconomic status and resilience of rural households, how to address drivers of change, and adapting CFR-RFF systems in response to changing needs.As socioeconomic and environmental changes take place, CFR-RFFs need to adapt to remain effective and deliver benefits. Building on the current system approaches could also extend the reach of CFR-RFFs and scale them further. The research and investments necessary to do so are outlined below:• Provide effective training and strengthen capacity. Ongoing investments are necessary to ensure both government and community committee members have adequate training and skills to manage CFRs. Some turnover should be expected, which is why continued investment is needed. To that end, it is important to develop and pilot a program as vocational training provided through the educational system and/or government induction training for government staff.• Engage youths and use technology to manage CFRs. Adding digital and data components to the management approach would have multiple impacts through investment that both engages youths and improves CFR management. Piloting youth training and developing digital and data components may include monitoring rainfall, water levels, water quality, floods, drought, illegal activities, and early warning or advisories for periods of water scarcity and/or high water demand. Using vocational and/or school curricula could train youths on CFR management, functions and conservation.• Use the CFR improvement fund as a periodic investment mechanism. Investments that improve the environment and biophysical conditions are important when establishing a CFR. They are also needed at regular intervals (every 3-5 years) to maintain activities beyond what the CFR committee has funds to achieve. The recently developed CFR improvement fund at the FiA could provide this periodic investment, if the fund is replenished.• Develop economic tools to guide CFR investment and valuation. A tool to estimate investment costs, including both biophysical and governance investments, could support future site selection and investments. A versatile tool would allow for analysis of the changing costs based on different contexts or starting conditions. A tool and/ or research is also needed to estimate long-term return on investment for CFR-RFF systems. Although several projects have monitored and evaluated specific aspects of CFR-RFF benefits, there is no systematic approach nor one that adequately values the benefits of climate resilience.• Develop and/or refresh practical guidelines.Developing and disseminating practical guidelines, such as the Manual of CFR-RFF Management, would support CFR-RFF management. As conditions change, this requires periodic investment to refresh and/or develop new guidelines. Currently, a general guideline for stocking CFRs is in development, and it can be updated in the future with recommendations for specific species.Expanding the recommendations for site selection and investment in the CFR-RFF manual is needed to include waterbody conditions that were not originally considered in candidate CFRs. A new guideline is also needed on developing nurseries and planting flood tolerant trees in CFRs, as these trees can stabilize fish habitats and banks. Guidelines on deepening CFRs are also needed, including on technical and operational guidance on bank slopes, bottom topography, placement of excavated soil, procurement, contracting transparency and working with an excavation company. The Sustainable Aquaculture and Community Fish Refuge Management project, supported by GIZ, saw a huge leap in harnessing the power of digital technologies to sustainably manage CFRs in the province of Kampong Thom. A CCTV camera, connected to the internet and powered by solar energy, has been helping the patrol team observe the conditions of the ponds in real-time and avoid fishing within the CFRs' protected areas. The experience of using cameras from other committees to manage CFRs which supported by project, some other committee along with installing solar cameras to monitor the CFRs."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1869315888.json b/main/part_2/1869315888.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c84895227db76bc7a6d7628a7f4f5c658ca7b3a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1869315888.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3447f23a29babb6d076eab02858a4119","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c3b70ec3-dcf8-4f8c-85c4-cfcad9bef867/retrieve","id":"141734667"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"22b2626e-4422-4d34-ab8d-d02ccf950c00","content":"The practice has always been to tie-down goats after roaming for food. Tying these animals down predisposes them to theft. With a machine like this, goats are left to roam freely and fed within the perimeter of the residence.\"The trainees in the four local government areas appreciated the Stover Crusher so much, some asked if they could rent the machine. Others plan on contributing money to buy the machine for their personal and communal use\", said Senior Research Supervisor, Joseph Abikoye. For these agriculture producers, the use of the machine automatically translates to a \"zero-wastage\" situation wherein no residue is left to be burned and the environment is better protected.For trainees in these local communities, the self-powered, locally-fabricated engine will encourage greatly goat-rearing within the localities. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1872770563.json b/main/part_2/1872770563.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..994836a6bb2af62584a0a48446ebd5a643506fef --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1872770563.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"078917fa00cf2ac4a2b40cce8e8ded73","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/679037a5-fb3c-49cf-8c8c-1ca3c98e6d3b/retrieve","id":"201517125"},"keywords":["P801 -1. Restoration (forest and landscape restoration)","D11494 -1.18 Maintenance and update current and new decision-support tools. Africa Tree Finder, The Species Switchboard, The Agroforestree Database, The Vegan Community Ecology Package, ResTool, others. (Not disseminated) Contributing CRPs/Platforms:","FTA -Forests, Trees and Agroforestry"],"sieverID":"a0add972-73ae-471a-bc48-24f9066df4f0","content":"A species' distribution can be characterized by the probability that it occurs at some location in space. Estimating occurrence probability can be easily accomplished using presence-absence data, but often researchers only have presence locations and environmental data for the study area. MAXENT is a popular software program for modeling species distributions, but it does not estimate the probability of occurrence. Rather, it returns various indices that are not easy to interpret . The package \"maxlike\" provides a simple likelihood-based alternative."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1876605699.json b/main/part_2/1876605699.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22d0d6ebc9fda991488ce58ae3884fa00b6c055d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1876605699.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"449cc0548fb5f749cace8620cd913d01","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/74d4ebee-51b8-4bb9-b92a-25ba801f64eb/retrieve","id":"-2111714466"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"28e767f2-6c12-4c91-a19c-9141a1463630","content":"• Per capita milk consumption is growing in Tanzania and projected to be between 55-100 liters per person per year by 2022• Poor feeding is the greatest contributor of the dismal animal performance• Feeding accounts up to 70% of the cost involved in milk production• Currently, roughages, the main diet comprise of natural grasses and crop residues often low in nutrients especially energy and protein vital for good animal performance• We set to demonstrate that use of improved forages can increase milk production compared to farmers usual practice in southern highlands of Tanzania .• We used smallholder dairy cows under their context• Feeding Brachiaria hybrid -Cobra to lactating cows and compare to farmers' practice• Awareness creation and dissemination linking with development partners• Contribute to development and improvement of Tanzania forage seed system involving private and policy makers• Address challenges that may rise i.e. forage pests and diseasesSolomon Mwendia, CIAT s.mwendia@cigar.org. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1904646826.json b/main/part_2/1904646826.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef6d9f445feeb83f9caf56c03811c5f65c4ae0b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1904646826.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"472ef38a8ec423a4877663807f613d54","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/73fefd68-7465-4fdc-8c66-8ab6013fda6e/retrieve","id":"-446391811"},"keywords":["atoxigenic","biocontrol","toxigenic","Aspergillus section Flavi","diversity"],"sieverID":"104a7df5-3327-445c-bf54-909cf8966762","content":"Aflatoxin contamination of the staples maize and groundnut is a concern for health and economic impacts across sub-Saharan Africa. The current study (i) determined aflatoxin levels in maize and groundnut collected at harvest in Burundi, (ii) characterized populations of Aspergillus section Flavi associated with the two crops, and (iii) assessed aflatoxin-producing potentials among the recovered fungi. A total of 120 groundnut and 380 maize samples were collected at harvest from eight and 16 provinces, respectively. Most of the groundnut (93%) and maize (87%) contained aflatoxin below the European Union threshold, 4 μg/ kg. Morphological characterization of the recovered Aspergillus section Flavi fungi revealed that the L-morphotype of A. flavus was the predominant species. Aflatoxin production potentials of the L-morphotype isolates were evaluated in maize fermentations. Some isolates produced over 137,000 μg/kg aflatoxin B 1 . Thus, despite the relatively low aflatoxin levels at harvest, the association of both crops with highly toxigenic fungi poses significant risk of post-harvest aflatoxin contamination and suggests measures to mitigate aflatoxin contamination in Burundi should be developed. Over 55% of the L-morphotype A. flavus did not produce aflatoxins. These atoxigenic L-morphotype fungi were characterized using molecular markers. Several atoxigenic genotypes were detected across the country and could be used as biocontrol agents. The results from the current study hold promise for developing aflatoxin management strategies centered on biocontrol for use in Burundi to reduce aflatoxin contamination throughout the value chain.Production of food crops including maize and groundnut in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faces a combination of challenges that reduce yields, including drought, pests, diseases, soil nutrient limitation, shortage of farm inputs and credit, climate change, low labor productivity, and high population pressure on farmland (Keya and Rubaihayo, 2013;Ludgate and Tata, 2015). Additionally, many crops are prone to contamination with aflatoxins, highly toxic secondary metabolites produced by Aspergillus section Flavi fungi (Pildain et al., 2008;Probst et al., 2010;Mutegi et al., 2012). Crop contamination with aflatoxins results in health and economic constraints in many regions (Probst et al., 2012). Also, the toxins increase mortality and reduce productivity in livestock (Ezekiel et al., 2014;Monson et al., 2015). Trade within and between countries is affected by the aflatoxin menace, leading to rejection of consignments, extra costs for product testing, and reduced marketable volumes (Ramesh et al., 2003;PACA, 2012;The Standard, 2019;Daily Nation, 2020).There are four major aflatoxins: B 1 , B 2 , G 1 , and G 2 . Aflatoxin B 1 is the most prevalent and toxic. Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus are the species most implicated in contamination events (Probst et al., 2007;Amaike and Keller, 2011). A. flavus produces B aflatoxins while A. parasiticus produces both B and G aflatoxins (Klich, 2007). A. flavus is subdivided in two morphotypes, L and S, which differ in genetic, physiological, and toxigenic characteristics (Cotty, 1989). Across SSA there are many types of aflatoxigenic fungi, several of them not formally described, that resemble the S-morphotype but that are not closely related (Frisvad et al., 2019;Singh et al., 2020). Some of those types of fungi produce B and G aflatoxins (Cotty and Cardwell, 1999). In the current paper, we use the term 'fungi with S-morphology' for all those Aspergillus resembling the S-morphotype of A. flavus, regardless of which aflatoxins they produce.Demand for maize, an important aflatoxin-prone staple in Burundi, has been increasing due to rapid population growth. Maize production in the country reached over 260,000 tons in 2020 making it the sixth-most important crop after cassava, bananas, sweet potato, beans, and potato (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2022). Maize in Burundi is mainly grown by smallholder farmers (around 0.5 ha/farm) for household consumption (Keya and Rubaihayo, 2013;Ludgate and Tata, 2015). Groundnut, with an annual production of approximately 9,300 tons in Burundi (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2022), is a traditional food mainly consumed as a snack and as a constituent of salads, porridges, and soups. Vulnerability of crops to mycotoxins varies as do their distribution in various crop matrices.Aflatoxin contamination can start in the field during crop development where it sometimes reaches dangerous levels (Mahuku et al., 2019). However, even when aflatoxin contamination is low at harvest, it can increase to dangerous levels under suboptimal storage (Seetha et al., 2017). In Burundi, aflatoxin content of maize and groundnut at harvest has not been carefully quantified. After harvest, farmers store maize and groundnut in their houses in pots, bags or spread on the floor. In the absence of drying, some such storage conditions can encourage growth of toxigenic fungi and subsequent mycotoxin production. Udomkun et al. (2018) reported high aflatoxin levels in cassava, maize and groundnut foodstuffs collected from local markets in Burundi. Sixty-eight per cent of the 300 collected samples (15% cassava, 77% maize and 84% groundnut) contained aflatoxin levels above the European Union Commission allowable threshold (EUC; 4 μg/kg; sum of aflatoxin B 1 , B 2 , G 1 , and G 2 ) and 37% samples (39% maize and 51% groundnut) exceeded the East African Community (EAC) standard (10 μg/kg total aflatoxins). It is not known whether those levels were due to either pre-or post-harvest contamination, or a combination of both.To better design appropriate aflatoxin management strategies in Burundi, the current study sought to (i) quantify aflatoxin levels in maize and groundnut collected at harvest across Burundi, (ii) characterize populations of Aspergillus section Flavi associated with the crops, (iii) quantify potentials of the recovered fungi to produce aflatoxins, and (iv) characterize molecularly the atoxigenic fungi. The obtained results provide knowledge on the extent of aflatoxin contamination in maize and groundnut in Burundi at harvest, as well as, the fungi responsible for aflatoxin contamination. A large number of atoxigenic fungi were detected, which can be put to use as components of aflatoxin management strategies across Burundi.Burundi lies between latitudes 2.3°S to 4.5°S and longitudes 28.8°E to 31.0°E. The elevation across the country ranges between 770 and 2,670 m above sea level (DFID, 2009). The country has five agroecological zones (AEZ), which are described in Table 1. The highest average annual rainfall occurs in the Congo-Nile ridge while the lowest occurs in the East and Northern depressions (Niyongabo, 2008). Most of the topography in Burundi is hilly, which constrains cultivation practices due to soil erosion and makes mechanization difficult. There are two main cropping seasons in Burundi: a short-rain season from September to February and a long-rain season from February to May (DFID, 2009). Smallholder farmers produce maize and groundnut mainly during the short-rain season in Burundi (Collins et al., 2013).Sampling was conducted across the major maize and groundnut production areas of Burundi (Figure 1). Maize was sampled from 2-3 communes (in parenthesis) in all 16 provinces: Bubanza (Gihanga, Mpanda), Bujumbura (Mutimbuzi, Nyabiraba, Mukike), Bururi (Burambi, Rumonge, Mugamba), Cankuzo (Cankuzo, Gisagara), Cibitoke (Rugombo, Mabayi, Mugina), Gitega (Makebuko, Mutaho), Karuzi (Buhiga, Nyabikere, Bugenyuzi), Kayanza (Gatara, Matongo, Muruta), Kirundo (Busoni, Kirundo), Makamba (Kayogoro, Mabanda, Vugizo), Muramvya (Bukeye, Rutegama), Muyinga (Giteranyi, Muyinga), Mwaro (Kayokwe, Rusaka), Ngozi (Gashikanwa, Kiremba), Rutana (Bukemba, Musongati), and Ruyigi (Butaganzwa, Kinyinya). Groundnut was sampled from 8 provinces: Makamba, Rutana, Muyinga, Kirundo, Ruyigi, Cankuzo, Gitega, and Muramwa.A total of 120 groundnut and 380 maize samples were collected from farmers' fields at harvest, in two batches. The first batch (250) was collected in the lowlands and midlands in March 2014, after the end of the short-rain season. The samples were transported to KALRO Regional Mycotoxin Laboratory in Katumani, Kenya for processing. The second batch of samples (250) were harvested in highland areas in July 2014 at the end of the long-rain season and sent to Katumani for processing and analysis. Up to 10 maize cobs (~1 kg of grains after shelling) were sampled per field while groundnut pods were collected from up to 10 points in each farm (approximately 500 g when shelled). All samples were collected by moving in a zigzag line across each farm.All cob/pod samples were sundried for 7 d, shelled manually and grain dried in a hot air oven (Memmert, United Kingdom) at 45°C for 48 h, to reach a moisture content of ≤ 13% for maize and ≤ 10% for groundnut. Moisture content was assessed using an Infratec™ 1241 Grain Analyzer (Foss, Denmark). Then, maize grains were ground using a coffee mill (Bunn-O-Matic Corp., Springfield, IL, United States) and groundnut grains were milled using a blender (BL335, Kenwood Intl., China). Both the coffee mill and blender were washed with 70% ethanol between samples to prevent cross contamination. All samples were divided in two halves, one for microbial and the other for aflatoxin analyzes. Halves for microbial analyzes were stored in hermetic bags at 4°C while those for aflatoxin analyzes were stored at −20°C until analysis.Aflatoxin levels in maize and groundnut were determined using Reveal Q+ for Aflatoxin kits and Accuscan Pro Reader (Neogen Corp., Lansing, MI, United States) following the manufacturer's instructions. After homogenizing the sub-samples, 10 g were taken, mixed with 50 ml 65% ethanol, and shaken for 3 min using an orbital shaker (HS501 IKA-WERKE, Germany). The mixture was filtered through fluted Whatman No. 4 filter paper (Whatman Intl. Ltd., Maidstone, England) into a Tri-Pour ® beaker. Thereafter, 500 μL sample diluent was transferred to a sample cup and 100 μL of sample filtrate was added and mixed by pipetting up and down seven times. A 100-μL of diluted sample extract was transferred into a new sample cup. A strip was placed into the sample cup and left for 6 min. Then, the strip was read in the Accuscan Pro Reader. The lower detection limit of the Reader was 2 μg/ kg while the upper detection limit was 150 μg/kg. Samples with more than 150 μg/kg were serially diluted in 65% ethanol, re-analyzed and the dilution factor was considered during the interpretation of results.For microbiological analyzes, the sub-samples from batch 1 were sent to IITA Pathology and Mycotoxin Laboratory in Ibadan, Nigeria under appropriate import/export permits provided by phytosanitary authorities. The sub-samples from batch 2 were analyzed in Katumani. Aspergillus section Flavi were isolated and identified as in previous studies in our research group (Atehnkeng et al., 2008;Agbetiameh , 2018). Modified Rose Bengal Agar (MRBA; 3 g sucrose, 3 g NaNO 3 , 0.75 g KH 2 PO 4 , 0.25 g K 2 HPO 4 , 0.5 g MgSO 4 .7H 2 O, 0.5 g KCl, 10 g NaCl, 1 mL A&M micronutrients, 0.025 g Rose Bengal stock solution, 0.05 g chloramphenicol, 1 L distilled water, pH = 6.5) was used for isolation while 5-2 agar (50 mL V-8™ juice, 950 mL distilled water, 20 g agar, pH = 6.0) was used for both identifying Aspergillus section Flavi fungi as well as for saving sporulating cultures. Both media were autoclaved for 20 min at 121°C and cooled to <60°C. After cooling, 0.01 g dichloran and 0.05 g streptomycin sulfate were added to MRBA before pouring into Petri dishes.Briefly, 1 g of each maize and groundnut sample was obtained from a thoroughly mixed sub-sample and suspended in 10 mL sterile distilled water. The suspension was homogenized by vortexing for 30 s and aliquots of 100 μL were inoculated on MRBA in a biosafety cabinet. Inoculated plates were incubated in the dark (31°C, 3 d).Putative Aspergillus section Flavi colonies were transferred to 5-2 plates using sterile toothpicks. When the number of putative section Flavi colonies per plate exceeded 10, the sub-sample was serially diluted and re-plated. When section Flavi colonies were not detected in a sample, the sub-sample weight or aliquot was increased accordingly. Colony forming units (CFU) of Aspergillus section Flavi per g of maize and groundnut were calculated as follows: CFU/g = (number of colonies × dilution factor) / weight of samples.Isolates with greenish-yellow colonies and no or large sclerotia were identified as A. flavus L-morphotype. Isolates with numerous small sclerotia were classified as fungi with S-morphology. Colonies showing dark green color and large, rough dark-green spores were assigned as A. parasiticus. Colonies showing brown color were identified as A. tamarii. Pure cultures of 12 isolates per sample were stored in 4 mL vials containing 2 mL sterile water and stored at room temperature (23 ± 2°C) for short-term storage. For long-term storage, cultures were stored on silica gel at 4°C.2.5.1. Inoculation of Aspergillus section Flavi isolates in aflatoxin-free maize Aflatoxin-free maize grains were sourced in both Katumani and Ibadan. Maize samples were analyzed using Accuscan Pro as above and considered as aflatoxin-free when no aflatoxin was detected in five tests. Five grams of aflatoxin-free grains were weighed into 40 mL clear glass vials, washed with tap water, and soaked overnight in 20 mL distilled water to adjust moisture content to 25%. The grains were then washed thrice with tap water to remove any fermentation product and thereafter autoclaved (20 min, 121°C, 15 psi). The sterile grains were independently inoculated with 500-μL spore suspension (approximately 10 6 spores/mL) of an Aspergillus section Flavi isolate. Cultures were incubated at 31°C (dark, 7 d) for fermentation of maize grains by the inoculated isolates. Vials containing sterile grains inoculated with sterile water were used as controls.Methodologies reported by Atehnkeng et al. (2008) andEzekiel et al. (2014) were used to extract and quantify aflatoxins. After incubation, maize fermentations were stopped by adding 50 mL 70% methanol and the colonized grains were ground for 3 min using a highspeed blender (Waring commercial, Springfield, IL, United States). The mixture was transferred to a 250 mL separating funnel and 25 mL distilled water added. Thereafter, aflatoxin was partitioned twice by adding 6.25 mL dichloromethane followed by 2.5 mL dichloromethane. The dichloromethane extracts were passed through a bed of anhydrous sodium sulfate contained in fluted Whatman No. 4 filter paper into a Tri-Pour beaker and evaporated to dryness in the dark in a fume hood. The dried extract was dissolved in 1 mL dichloromethane and poured into a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. The toxin was then evaporated to dryness and tubes were stored at 4°C in darkness. Extracts were sent to IITA-Ibadan via courier for quantification.In Ibadan, aflatoxin extracts were re-dissolved in 1 mL dichloromethane. Then, extracts and aflatoxin standards of known concentrations were spotted on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates. The plates were developed in diethylene:methanol:water (96:3:1) solution and then visualized under UV light (365 nm). The presence or absence of aflatoxin B 1 , B 2 , G 1 , and G 2 was scored visually. Then, aflatoxins were quantified using a TLC Scanner 3 (CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland) with winCATS 1.4.2 software (Camag AG, Muttenz, Switzerland). The limit of quantification for all experiments was 2 μg/kg.A total of 1,335 A. flavus L-morphotype isolates that did not produce aflatoxins in maize fermentations (1,167 from maize and 168 from groundnut) were characterized using simple sequence repeats (SSRs) developed for A. flavus (Grubisha and Cotty, 2009). Previously described protocols were used to extract DNA from single-spored isolates and conduct the multiplex-PCR and microsatellite genotyping analyzes (Callicott and Cotty, 2015;Islam et al., 2018).The ability of representative isolates of 11 selected atoxigenic SSR haplotypes to reduce aflatoxin when co-inoculated with a potent aflatoxin-producing A. flavus isolate (BUM009-08 from Burundi) was determined in laboratory competition assays as described earlier (Probst and Cotty, 2012;Agbetiameh et al., 2019). Briefly, inocula of single-spored isolates were grown on 5-2 agar. An equal amount of spore suspensions (1 × 10 6 spores/mL) of individual atoxigenic isolate and the common toxigenic isolate (1 mL each) were combined and inoculated on 10 g autoclaved maize grain. Maize grains inoculated individually with each atoxigenic isolate, the toxigenic isolate, and water served as controls. There were four replications for each co-inoculation and control treatment. Following inoculation, protocols for maize fermentation and aflatoxin quantification process were similar as described in the previous sections.Data on CFU/g, frequency of Aspergillus section Flavi species, and aflatoxins produced by the recovered fungi were analyzed using a negative binomial generalized linear model in R studio v3.5.3. Means were separated using Fisher's protected least significance difference (LSD; α = 0.05). Aspergillus section Flavi isolates were categorized into aflatoxigenic and atoxigenic based on their ability to produce aflatoxin in maize fermentations. Aflatoxin content in samples at harvest was categorized into four levels: (i) aflatoxin below LOD of the kits (no aflatoxin), (ii) aflatoxin below the EUC threshold (4 μg/kg), (iii) aflatoxin above 4 μg/kg but below the EAC threshold (10 μg/kg), and (iv) aflatoxin above the EAC threshold. A chi-square test of association between aflatoxin concentrations and sample type (maize or groundnut) was performed in SPSS v.22 (IBM Corp, New York, United States). Correlation analysis among the population of Aspergillus section Flavi and levels of aflatoxins produced by selected isolates was performed in SPSS v.22. Before analysis of SSR data, amplicon sizes were converted to repeat number by subtracting the size of the flanking region from the total amplicon size and then dividing by the size of the repeat. Allele frequencies and haplotypes were assessed with GenoDive (Meirmans and Van Tienderen, 2004). Relationships among unique haplotypes were displayed with a Neighbor-Net network generated with SplitsTree4 (Huson and Bryant, 2006) based on chord distances calculated with GenoDive. After sample-correcting the data by removing duplicate, identical haplotypes found in the same sample, an AMOVA (analysis of molecular variance) was performed using Arlequin v3.5.2.2 (Excoffier and Lishcer, 2010) to examine genetic variation by province.Although 76% of both maize and groundnut contaminated with aflatoxin met the EUC threshold ( < 4 μg/kg), and a few maize (3%) and groundnut (6%) samples contained aflatoxin above the EAC threshold (10 μg/kg; Figure 2). Each of Burambi, Gihanga, Kayogoro, Kinyinya, Mpanda, Rugombo, and Kirundo communes had a maize sample contaminated with aflatoxin above 10 μg/kg, while Mabayi and Butaganzwa had two samples each. On the other hand, four groundnut samples (out of 10) from Vugizo had > 10 μg/kg aflatoxin compared to one sample each from Muyinga, Giteranyi, and Busoni.There were four types of fungi within Aspergillus section Flavi recovered from maize and groundnut: the A. flavus L-morphotype, fungi with S-morphology, A. parasiticus, and A. tamarii. The Aspergillus section Flavi population densities were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in maize (mean = 1,153 CFU/g) than in groundnut (mean = 266 CFU/g). For maize, there were significant (p < 0.001) differences in fungal densities among provinces (Figure 3A; data of only 10 of the 17 provinces shown) and within communes of a province (data not shown). The fungal density was low (< 50 CFU/g) in Karuzi, Kayanza, Muramvya, Muyinga, Mwaro, and Ngozi. Also, fungal densities in groundnut significantly (p < 0.005) differed among provinces (Figure 3B).The population of Aspergillus section Flavi in both maize and groundnut was dominated by the A. flavus L-morphotype. However, on an average, the proportion was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in maize (92%) than in groundnut (60%; Figures 4A,B). Proportions of Aspergillus section Flavi fungi significantly (p < 0.001) differed among provinces for both crops, with L-morphotype ranging from 85 to 98% in maize, and 45 to 85% in groundnut.Overall, 44.4% of the Aspergillus section Flavi isolates were toxigenic (Table 2). Proportionally, there were more toxigenic fungi with S-morphology isolates while there were more atoxigenic A. flavus L-morphotype isolates (Table 2). The concentration of aflatoxin B 1 was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in isolates recovered from groundnut (mean = 2,617 μg/kg) than in isolates from maize (mean = 1,728 μg/ kg). Fungi with S-morphology generally produced higher concentrations of each type of aflatoxin than the other isolates; A. parasiticus produced higher concentrations of B 2 in groundnut and of G 1 in maize. Overall, 93.5% of the fungi with S-morphology produced aflatoxins (31.9% produced only B aflatoxins); only two isolates of A. parasiticus did not produce aflatoxins. The recovered A. tamarii fungi did not produce aflatoxin, as expected (Table 2).Concentrations of aflatoxins produced by selected A. flavus L-morphotype isolates had a negative correlation with the population of A. flavus L-morphotype in the samples from which the isolates were recovered (r = −0.508, p < 0.001). On the contrary, aflatoxin concentrations produced by selected fungi with S-morphology had a positive correlation with the population of this type of fungi in samples from which the isolates were recovered (r = 0.589, p < 0.001). These correlations were consistent for the types of aflatoxins produced by the two types of fungi. Moreover, there was a positive correlation between aflatoxin G 1 (r = 0.315, p < 0.001) and G 2 (r = 0.258, p = 0.002) produced by A. parasiticus with the population of the fungus in the samples from which the isolates were recovered.Atoxigenic isolates of A. flavus were highly diverse. There were 376 SSR haplotypes among the 1,335 atoxigenic isolates, representing 85 unique SSR haplotypes in the 168 groundnut isolates and 336 unique SSR haplotypes in 1,167 maize isolates. Supplementary Table S1 provides allele sizes of 17 SSR loci (Grubisha and Cotty, 2009) for the 376 SSR haplotypes of atoxigenic A. flavus found in Burundi. A Neighbor-Net visualization of the unique haplotypes (Figure 5) color coded by whether the haplotype was found in maize, groundnut, or both crops, shows a highly diverse collection of genotypes, with no separation by crop origin. A few groups of haplotypes were found only in maize (Figure 5). An AMOVA of isolates by crop origin confirmed this lack of separation, with 99.94% of the genetic variation found within each crop and only 0.06% between the two crops, with a fixationPopulation (colony forming units per gram) of Aspergillus section Flavi in maize (A) and groundnut (B) sampled from major provinces in Burundi. The letters attached to the bars represent statistical significance at 95% confidence level. Aspergillus population in maize was low in some provinces (Karuzi, Kayanza, Muramvya, Muyinga, Mwaro and Ngozo) and hence data for these provinces not plotted.Proportion (%) of members of Aspergillus section Flavi recovered in maize (A) and groundnut (B) from major production provinces in Burundi.Nsabiyumva et al.10.3389/fmicb.2023.1106543Frontiers in Microbiology frontiersin.org index close to zero (F ST = 0.00063; p = 0.25; Supplementary Table S2).Likewise, no significant difference was seen among populations. For example, the 20 most frequent haplotypes were found in, on an average, 10 of the 17 provinces (Supplementary Table S3). This lack of differentiation is also seen using AMOVA; only 0.76% of the variation is attributable to differences among provinces, and as in the crop comparison, the fixation index is very low (F ST = 0.0075; p = 0.00, Supplementary Table S4).Representative isolates of the SSR haplotypes were evaluated for their ability to limit aflatoxin when co-inoculated with the highly toxigenic A. flavus isolate BUM009-08, which produced 4,480 μg/ kg aflatoxins when inoculated alone (Table 3). Aflatoxin reduction ranged from 28.3 to 96.0%. Four isolates (BUG241-03, BUG208-07, BUM134-06, and BUM184-12) reduced aflatoxin by > 90%. Two more isolates (BUG242-04 and BUM033-05) had statistically similar, though numerically less, aflatoxin reductions compared to the four isolates named earlier. No aflatoxin was produced in maize grains inoculated with the atoxigenic isolates alone and in water control.The population genetic analyzes revealed several atoxigenic SSR haplotypes widely distributed across Burundi (Figure 6). Some SSR haplotypes were found exclusively in maize or groundnut, while others were found in both crops (Figure 5). The distribution of haplotypes varied within five regions: north, south, center, east, and west (Table 3). Five haplotypes were detected in all five regions while other specific haplotypes were found in 1 to 4 regions. Wide distribution and large number of members were used as criteria for selection, in addition to their abilities to reduce aflatoxin in the co-inoculation. The four isolates selected as active ingredients of the biocontrol product Aflasafe BU01 (BUG241-03, BUG208-07, BUM033-05, and BUM056-02) had medium to high ability to limit aflatoxin contamination (Table 3). Each of the four belong to a unique SSR haplotype with frequent occurrence and wide distribution in at least 8 provinces located in 4 to 5 regions in Burundi (Figure 6A). Two other isolates (BUM184-12 and BUM021-05) were potentially good candidate active ingredients. Also, the analysis revealed that the genetic groups to which the active ingredient isolates of the biocontrol product Aflasafe KE01 belong to are also native to Burundi (Figure 6B; Supplementary Table S1), in addition to being common in Kenya, for which Aflasafe KE01 was originally developed. SSR fingerprints of the active ingredients of Aflasafe BU01 and Aflasafe KE01 are provided in Table 4.In the current study, maize and groundnut produced in Burundi were examined for aflatoxin content at harvest. Over 75% of the crops contained aflatoxin levels considered by the EUC as safe for human consumption (less than 4 μg/kg total aflatoxin). Both crops were associated with various types of aflatoxin-producing fungi, including some with the capacity to contaminate crops with dangerous concentrations of aflatoxins. The fungal communities were dominated by the A. flavus L-morphotype and most members of this group were atoxigenic. Other members of the communities were fungi with S-morphology and A. parasiticus; both of which exhibited high capacity to produce aflatoxins. Within atoxigenic fungi (1,335 isolates), several genotypes associated with both maize and groundnut were detected across Burundi, including genotypes of active ingredients of the aflatoxin biocontrol product Aflasafe KE01already registered for use in Kenya. The results from the current study provide evidence of the extent of aflatoxin contamination of maize and groundnut at harvest in Burundi and revealed structures and compositions of fungal communities associated with the two crops, with some members of those communities posing a risk during the postharvest stage while others with potential for use in aflatoxin management. The identified fungi with potential for use as biocontrol agents in Burundi need to be tested across Burundi to determine their effectiveness in limiting aflatoxin contamination at pre-and postharvest stages (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2022).Overall, only a small fraction of the samples contained aflatoxins above 4 μg/kg, the EUC threshold (Figure 2). Aflatoxins were not detected in most (approximately 90%) of the groundnut and maize a There were 20 fungi with S-morphology isolates from maize that produced only B aflatoxins. b There were three fungi with S-morphology isolates from groundnut that produced only B aflatoxins.(50%) samples. The environmental conditions of the five AEZs in Burundi (Table 1) may not allow for aflatoxin production in the field despite the association of both crops with aflatoxin-producers (Figure 3) and the high aflatoxin-production potential of a significant proportion of the associated fungi (Table 2). However, apart from potential aflatoxin contamination in the field, crops associated with potent aflatoxin producers are at high risk of contamination, if stored under sub-optimal conditions (Hell et al., 2008;Seetha et al., 2017;Senghor et al., 2020), or if climate change result in conditions favorable for aflatoxin production. Unfortunately, models indicate that in large portions of East Africa, including Burundi, maize production will become severally affected by climate change (Ojara et al., 2021). In Burundi, as in many other countries in SSA, storage needs significant improvement to discourage post-harvest losses, including aflatoxin contamination (Udomkun et al., 2017). Most maize and groundnut samples met the EUC threshold (<4 μg/kg) and hence were regarded as safe for human consumption. However, low aflatoxin levels at harvest do not necessarily mean that the crops will remain safe, especially in the absence of integrated programs promoting food safety from field to fork. The A. flavus L-morphotype was the predominant species in both maize and groundnut (Figure 4). Similarly, the L-morphotype composes ~80% of the maize and groundnut communities in various SSA countries (Atehnkeng et al., 2008;Mutegi et al., 2012;Probst et al., 2012). Dominance of the L-morphotype significantly corresponded with low levels of aflatoxin in most maize and groundnut, which concurs with findings of a study in Kenya reporting that the L-morphotype dominated non-aflatoxin-outbreak regions while fungi with S-morphology dominated aflatoxin outbreak regions (Probst et al., 2010). On the other hand, communities of the A. flavus L-morphotype have been reported to produce high aflatoxin levels (Atehnkeng et al., 2008;Okoth et al., 2012;Agbetiameh et al., 2019) and therefore high prevalence of the L-morphotype cannot be used as a conclusive proxy for the aflatoxin concentration of a crop. The incidence of A. parasiticus was relatively low in both groundnut and maize. In other reports, A. parasiticus has been reported to have a high association with groundnut fields (Horn and Dorner, 1998;Kachapulula et al., 2017). However, several studies from our research group have noticed low incidence of A. parasiticus in groundnut samples in certain countries: Ghana (Agbetiameh et al., 2019), Mali and Sudan (unpublished). It is unclear which factor led to relatively low levels of A. parasiticus in groundnut in Burundi.Around 40% of A. flavus L-morphotype were toxigenic (Table 2). Over 2 decades ago, the same percentage of A. flavus isolated from foods in Burundi were toxigenic (Munimbazi and Bullerman, 1996). In addition, over 90% of both fungi with S-morphology and A. parasiticus exhibited high aflatoxin production potential (Table 2), which is a norm for both groups of fungi. The high levels of aflatoxins (>1,500 μg/kg) in some groundnut samples can be attributed to the presence of potent toxigenic strains. The levels of aflatoxin produced in vitro by fungi with S-morphology and A. parasiticus had a positive correlation with the population of each type of fungi. Similar studies (Jaime-Garcia and Cotty, 2006;Probst et al., 2007Probst et al., , 2012;;Mauro et al., 2015) showed a positive correlation between the presence of fungi with S-morphology and high aflatoxin levels. Since the examined crops were collected at harvest, there is still a high risk of contamination during storage and subsequent exposure of consumers of the foodstuffs, if aflatoxin-conducive conditions occur throughout storage and before consumption.Fungi with S-morphology were more toxigenic than A. flavus L-morphotype, as previously reported (Probst et al., 2007;Mutegi et al., 2012). Therefore, even low levels of fungi with S-morphology are a high risk to accumulation of unsafe aflatoxin levels in crops. Fungi with S-morphology were implicated in the high levels of aflatoxin contamination that claimed more than 125 lives in lower eastern Kenya in 2004 (Probst et al., 2012(Probst et al., , 2014)). However, Probst et al. (2011) also reported that 33% of A. flavus L-morphotype isolates recovered from Kenya were not toxigenic. The high prevalence of atoxigenic A. flavus L-morphotype isolates is encouraging, as it provides many potential aflatoxin biocontrol agents to protect maize and groundnut (Probst et al., 2011;Agbetiameh et al., 2019). Indeed, when the atoxigenic isolates were genotyped with SSR markers, a few SSR genotypes occurred in high frequency and in several provinces demonstrating wide distribution and hence potential of high adaptation in the country (Table 3; Supplementary Table S1). An extensive Aspergillus population distribution study in Kenyan soil showed that the active ingredients of the biocontrol product Aflasafe KE01 are widely distributed in Kenya (Islam et al., 2021). Isolates of some representative Burundi-specific SSR groups detected in the current study were tested in laboratory assays as potential candidates for the development of biocontrol products for aflatoxin management for use in Burundi (Table 3).There are several criteria for selecting atoxigenic isolates to constitute biocontrol products containing multiple active ingredients, including frequent occurrence and wide distribution across the target region, membership to VCGs composed entirely of atoxigenic members, superior ability to reduce aflatoxins in laboratory experiments (Moral et al., 2020) and displacement ability in field experiments (Agbetiameh et al., 2019), among others. Recently, our group reported that in some cases, after application, some active ingredient fungi are found at higher proportions in the soil while others in the grain (Atehnkeng et al., 2022). Those results suggest that under some conditions some Neighbor-Net tree of 376 unique non-aflatoxigenic haplotypes found in Burundi. Haplotypes seen only in maize are shaded red, those found only in groundnut are shaded blue, and those in both crops are shaded black.Frontiers in Microbiology frontiersin.org active ingredient isolates may be better displacers of aflatoxin producers in the soil than the others, and those others may competitively displace better in the grain that would appear as the major contributor on aflatoxin reduction. However, the displacement in the soil is important to prevent aflatoxin producers from reaching the maturing crop.For biocontrol formulation for Burundi, a balanced selection took into consideration isolates belonging to SSR groups with frequent occurrence and wide distribution, and high aflatoxin reductions. Therefore, there was one isolate (BUM056-02) from a group with frequent occurrence, detected in many regions across Burundi, but with relatively less aflatoxin reduction in the competition experiments (Table 3). We hypothesize that the isolate will compensate its relatively lower ability to reduce aflatoxin in the laboratory with its ability to dominate crops and soils from the target areas. Indeed, initial field testing of the biocontrol product developed for Burundi reveals that treated crops contain lower aflatoxin levels than nontreated crops (data not shown). Thus, the rationale for selecting the active ingredient fungi appears to be correct. Nonetheless, an advantage of characterizing large numbers of A. flavus isolates in Burundi is that a rich germplasm of atoxigenic A. flavus is available to replace any active ingredient isolate of Aflasafe BU01, if performing poorly in the soil and the crop. It has also been argued that aflatoxin biocontrol products containing various active ingredient fungi should contain isolates with opposing mating-type idiomorphs (Moore, 2022). Three of the selected isolates (BUG241-03, BUG208-07, and BUM056-02) contain the MAT1-1 idiomorph while the other (BUM033-05) contains the MAT1-2 idiomorph (data not shown).In various SSA countries, use of aflatoxin biocontrol products based on atoxigenic fungi have been developed, tested, registered, and to the private sector for large scale use (Probst et al., 2011;Agbetiameh et al., 2019;Bandyopadhyay et al., 2022).Aspergillus from the crop environment, and this results in low aflatoxin levels in crops at harvest and during storage, even under sub-optimal conditions (Senghor et al., 2020). While there were groups of atoxigenic haplotypes only seen in maize, it is likely that this is due to the much larger maize sample size (Table 2). We detected atoxigenic fungal genotypes never reported outside of Burundi (Figure 6A), but also atoxigenic genotypes native to Kenya (Figure 6B) that have been already registered for use as active ingredients of the biocontrol product Aflasafe KE01 (Adhikari et al., 2016;Moral et al., 2020). Extension of the label for use of Aflasafe KE01 in groundnut and sorghum is ongoing.East Africa has a broad diversity of agroecologies including both high elevation and low elevation production areas. Between Kenya and Burundi these agroecologies are well represented. Frequent association of the active ingredients of Aflasafe KE01 with maize and groundnut produced in Burundi, in addition to Uganda (G. Mahuku, personal communication) indicates that the Aflasafe KE01 active ingredients may be broadly effective across East Africa. On-going field testing of a country specific Aflasafe product for use in Burundi, Aflasafe BU01 (Figure 6A), and Aflasafe KE01 hold promise to manage aflatoxin contamination in Burundi. Both Burundi and Kenya belong to the EAC, which also includes Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania, and DR Congo. EAC Partner States are promoting the use of biocontrol through ongoing harmonization of regional regulatory frameworks for biocontrol agents (Ortega-Beltran and Bandyopadhyay, 2021). 1 1 https://www.eac.int/documents/category/ aflatoxin-prevention-and-controlDistribution across Burundi of the active ingredient atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus isolates composing the aflatoxin biocontrol product Aflasafe BU01 (A) and Aflasafe KE01 (B). Aflasafe KE01 was developed for use in Kenya but its active ingredients, apart from Burundi, have been detected in several other countries.10. 3389/fmicb.2023.1106543 Frontiers in Microbiology 11 frontiersin.orgOnly a small proportion of samples (groundnut = 6%, maize = 3%) was contaminated with aflatoxins above the EAC threshold of 10 μg/kg. However, maize and groundnut were associated with highly toxigenic fungi, representing a risk of contamination during the post-harvest stages, which may last for more than 1 year. Further studies to assess contamination further up the value chain are necessary. The population of Aspergillus section Flavi in both maize and groundnut was composed of a significant proportion of aflatoxigenic strains. Fungi with S-morphology were the most toxigenic while A. flavus L-morphotype isolates were mostly atoxigenic. While the observed and potential contamination can be attributed to the fungi with S-morphology, the high proportion of A. flavus L-morphotype provides hope for developing biocontrol products for use in Burundi. Indeed, among the L-morphotype isolates of A. flavus, 55% were atoxigenic within which a few genetic groups were widely distributed in Burundi. The active ingredients of the biocontrol product registered for use in Kenya (Aflasafe KE01) were also found in Burundi and could be evaluated in Burundi. In addition, another biocontrol product, Aflasafe BU01, was formulated with four different widely distributed genetic groups specific to Burundi. However, biocontrol must be supported by other interventions including awareness creation, timely harvesting, rapid grain drying, appropriate storage structures, sorting, and processing and insect control at pre-and post-harvest stages. from the Bill & Melinda Gate Foundation (OPP1133356). Support was also provided by USDA Agricultural Research Project 5347-42000-02-00D. We also gratefully acknowledge additional funding support from the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), and the CGIAR Plant Health Initiative by CGIAR Trust Fund contributors (https://www.cgiar.org/research/)."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1932385854.json b/main/part_2/1932385854.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8bbedd2593e094c9b4d5b2438b2ead2210255d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1932385854.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"bbe31818c76de0f965f0a72ef6f5aa79","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2b55c014-0db9-4446-bfc5-eaed331fca1f/retrieve","id":"-431089477"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"72b71636-dfd1-4417-bebc-e94748ac1bd6","content":"The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture maintains the world's largest collection of cowpea germplasm of over 15,000 accessions. A sub-set of 298 lines from the loosely composed mini core collection of 370 landraces were genotyped based on genotyping by sequencing (GBS). Ward's minimum variance hierarchical cluster analysis, model-based ancestry analysis and discriminant analysis of principal component (DAPC) were carried out on this sub-set. Three clusters were identified by the different clustering methods. Principal component analysis further supported the three clusters especially when accessions are scattered along the axes of the first two principal components. The first two principal components explained a total of 22.30% of the variation. Cluster one comprises 115 accessions from the largest number of countries and has the highest gene diversity, heterozygosity and polymorphic information content (PIC) values. Cluster two is made up of 102 accessions, 90 percent of which are from West and Central Africa. Analysis of molecular variance shows that the most variation is among accessions and lowest among clusters. No cluster is made exclusively of accessions from a single country. Based on SNP markers, the sub set of cowpea mini core germplasm collection used in this study encompasses the diversity in the crop.Cowpea is one of the important grain legume crops in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where it contributes to food and nutritional security, fodder for livestock, soil fertility following N fixation as well as income for farmers and food vendors. It is native to SSA where the greatest genetic diversity for this crop exists. While the centre of diversity of cowpea's wild progenitor is suggested to be in eastern and southern Africa, based on the presence in the sub-region of several primitive, weedy and wild types 1,2 , that of the cultivated type is in West Africa 3 . More than 75% of the over 15,000 accessions of cultivated cowpea germplasm collected from about 90 countries 4 and maintained at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) are from the West Africa sub-region 5 . Arguably, this supports the assertion that the greatest diversity exists in the sub-region which therefore confirms the area as the crop's center of origin 6 . Besides IITA,diversity. The smaller number in the core or mini core collections makes characterization and exploitation of the germplasm for crop improvement more realistic 10 .Some studies aimed at understanding the genetic diversity in cowpea using molecular markers have been reported. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers were used to study genetic variation in the genus Vigna which comprised cowpea accessions and some of its wild relatives 11 . The RFLP markers separated accessions of cultivated cowpea from the wild relatives as well as from the Asiatic Vigna species. Gene derived markers and sequencing were successful in revealing more polymorphisms among Vigna species than within species 12 . Genetic variation among cowpea breeding lines was evaluated using simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers and a high level of homozygosity detected 13 . The study also revealed that some recent breeding lines derived from crosses involving several unimproved germplasm lines showed relatively higher levels of genetic diversity. One thousand two hundred (1,200) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were used to analyse genetic variation among 422 cowpea accessions and the study revealed the existence of two cowpea genepools, one for West Africa and the second for East Africa 5 . These authors also reported that genetic variation among landraces from outside of Africa was slightly higher than within African landraces.Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) based genotyping procedures such as Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) represent a high-marker density approach compared with previous technologies such as RFLP, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and SSR. GBS is based on reducing genome complexity with restriction enzymes, coupled with multiplex NGS for high-density SNP markers discovery 14 . The genome-wide molecular marker discovery, highly multiplexed genotyping, flexibility and relatively low cost make GBS an excellent tool in plant genetics and breeding 15,16 . GBS is increasingly being used in both genetic diversity analyses of cultivated and wild crop relatives 17,18 , development of genetic linkage maps 19 , genomic selection and genome wide association studies 20,21 GBS was used to study genetic diversity among 768 cowpea germplasm lines and the results indicated that the route of the migration of cowpea germplasm to different parts of the globe could be traced to the two candidate original areas of West and East Africa 7 .Despite their usefulness in studying genetic diversity in crop species, different types of molecular markers are not equally informative. For example, SSR markers were found to be more informative in the classification of some wild rice lines when compared to SNP even though a higher number of the latter marker type was detected 22 . On the other hand, it was reported that in grape the core lacked a quarter of alleles found in the whole sativa collections when SSR markers were used 23 . However, each of the three grape core collections contained almost the whole diversity of the crop when 704 SNP markers were utilized. This suggests that there would be limitations in interpreting results of genetic diversity in grape based on SSR. In addition, many of the marker systems are constrained by high costs required for large-scale analyses 24 . The allele specific SNP markers have limitations as they require upfront investments including time and cost for discovery of informative SNPs and assay development. However, the high throughput genome complexity reducing procedures such as GBS have advantages over the conventional and allele specific SNP markers as they enable simultaneous discovery and genotyping of genome wide SNP markers within a shorter time and at lower cost.As much as molecular markers can help in understanding the extent of genetic diversity in crop germplasm and its management, caution need be exercised in applying results obtained from molecular marker-based diversity studies especially as they pertain to germplasm conservation efforts. This is because in the process of evolution, adaptiveness plays a major role in the survival of individuals in populations and it is not easy to determine if plant selection acts on markers directly or on associated loci responsible for adaptive properties. Raybould et al. 25 reported that molecular markers detected significant gene flow in the United Kingdom's Beta maritima populations whereas isozymes analyses suggested very little gene flow. The authors explained this observation as evidence of selection for traits associated with isozymes. A study of closely related Avena barbata and A. hirtula and the analysis of multi-locus dynamics through several generations support that inbreeding, even when coupled with tight linkage does not necessarily hold the genotypes together 26 . However, if the adaptive properties are due to associated loci, they behave as a virtually indivisible unity with the genetic markers analysed. The development and maintenance of plant's adaptiveness within populations are favoured by self-pollination which also enhances the development of spatial differentiation 27 . It is advisable, therefore, that when making germplasm collections for conservation purposes, efforts should focus not only on alleles that contribute to adaptiveness but also multi-locus combinations of alleles that interact with one another in an epistatic favourable way 26 . In the current study, we carried out GBS on 298 of the cowpea mini core lines to understand the underlying genetic diversity and population structure among the cowpea germplasm assemblage maintained at IITA.Genetic diversity. The 298 lines used in this study were collected from 50 countries and they make up most (about 81%) of the cowpea mini core (list of mini core lines used in Supplementary Table 1). The number of lines from Nigeria (55) is the highest among the mini core sub-set followed by those from India (33) and Republic of Niger (24). However, among the 370 mini core lines there are 72, 37 and 33 from each of the three countries representing 19.4%, 10.0% and 8.9% of accessions respectively.The genetic distance based on differences at marker loci between pairs of the selected accessions range between 0.0096 and 0.462 (Fig. 1). Diversity indices statistics indicate average minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.209 and polymorphic information content (PIC) of 0.234 while inbreeding coefficient vary widely from as low as −0.438 to as high as 0.929 with a mean of 0.746. The mean expected heterozygosity (0.296) is higher than observed heterozygosity (0.075) values (Table 1).Population structure. The three complementary methods used in determining the number of clusters among the sub-set of the cowpea mini-core population all show the presence of three major clusters. The error rate from cross-validation method used by ADMIXTURE and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) from discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) to determine the appropriate number of sub-populations show rapid decline from K = 1 to K = 3 and from 1 to 3 respectively (Fig. 2), indicating that the samples can be grouped into three main clusters.The distribution of the tested cowpea mini core lines based on hierarchical clustering dendrogram (Fig. 3A), the model-based structure analysis (Fig. 3B), DAPC plot (Fig. 3C) and scatter plot from DAPC (Fig. 4) show that the accessions are divided into three major clusters. Groups of the DAPC plot and the arms of the dendrogram correspond to K = 3 of the admixture plot. Assignments of the 298 cowpea accessions into the three clusters identified on the Ward's distance hierarchical dendrogram, DAPC and Admixture ancestry are generally in agreement. On the dendrogram, the number of lines per cluster varied from 81 (cluster 3) to 115 (cluster 1) (Supplementary Table 1). The 55 accessions from Nigeria are distributed into the three clusters with about half the number (28) in cluster one. Cluster two has 23 Nigerian accessions, while cluster three has four accessions. The 33 accessions from India are also distributed into the three clusters, 11 in cluster one, three in cluster two and 19 in cluster three. Most accessions (22) from Niger are in cluster two while the remaining two are in cluster three. There is no cluster made up exclusively of accessions from the same country although there are some cases where all accessions from same country belong in same cluster. For example, all four accessions from Lesotho are in cluster one and the four from Senegal are in cluster two. Ninety-two of the 102 lines (approx. 90%) in cluster two are from 13 West and Central African countries while the others are from Tanzania, Botswana, India, USA and two from unknown countries. Cluster three with the lowest number of accessions contained all the lines from Egypt ( 14) except one that is in cluster one as well as most of the accessions from East and Southern Africa. Membership clustering for DAPC ranged from 91 to 107. Group one is made up of 100 accessions with most accessions from Nigeria. Group two has 107 accessions with majority of them from Nigeria and Niger while group three has 91 accessions with most of the accessions coming from India and Egypt. Group membership from DAPC is to a large extent in agreement with the hierarchical dendrogram clustering. Group one has 99 accessions in agreement with the hierarchical dendrogram out of the 100 members assigned by the DAPC while group two has 100 accessions in agreement with hierarchical dendrogram out of the 107 members assigned to the group. The third group with 91 accessions has 81 accessions in agreement with the hierarchical dendrogram.Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed and it further supported the groupings of the samples based on the membership assignment from DAPC (Fig. 4). The first principal component explains 15.3 percent of variation and the second explains seven percent. Both explain 22.3% of the total variation (Supplementary Table 2).for the three observed groups show that, irrespective of clustering method used, group one shows the highest polymorphic information content, number of effective alleles, expected and observed heterozygosity (Table 2). However, depending on the clustering method that was used the values vary for groups two and three. Analysis of molecular variance was also carried out on the identified groups on the hierarchical dendrogram and DAPC. The results of analysis are identical irrespective of the clustering method used for the structure analysis. The observed variance partitioned among the three groups is 16 percent, 66 percent of the variance partitioned among individual accessions and 18 percent within the accessions (Table 3).There is a moderate amount of differentiation between the three groups (F ST = 0.16, F' ST = 0.24), indicating that the groups are relatively genetically distinct. The F IS and F IT values are 0.78 and 0.82 respectively indicating that the cowpea lines making up the groups are inbred lines.The world's largest cowpea germplasm collection maintained at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) headquarters in Ibadan Nigeria has more than 15,000 landraces and over 2,000 wild relatives. These accessions have served and continue to serve as sources of genes for desirable traits contributing to the successes being recorded in variety development especially in sub-Saharan Africa. In this study involving a sub-set of the mini core collection, a low number of robust SNP markers was observed which can be attributed to the non-availability of reference SNP discovery pipeline (when the study was performed) or the acknowledged narrow genetic base of cowpea 13,28 . The observed genetic distance based on markers between pairs of randomly selected members of the cowpea mini core range between 0.0096 and 0.462 (Fig. 1) while in an earlier study by Huynh et al. 5 genetic distances based on shared alleles among a collection of cowpea ranged from 0.01 to 0.72. Following the use of gene-derived markers and sequencing on the USDA Vigna germplasm collection it was concluded that genetic diversity present in cowpea was minimal and genetic distances among accessions low 12 . Vaillancourt and Weeden 29 had also earlier reported very low level of chloroplast DNA diversity in landraces compared to wild cowpea and based on the observations concluded that 1) the domesticated form was derived from a narrow selection of the wild germplasm and 2) chloroplast gene flow between wild and cultivated types has been very limited. In addition, the authors detected no homoplasy in tested cultivated and wild relatives following construction of a hierarchical tree. Genetic diversity was reported to be low among cowpea populations collected from Benin Republic 30 , Ghana 31 and Sudan 32 . In explaining what could be responsible for the narrow genetic base for cowpea Coulibaly et al. 1 suggested that a single domestication event may have occurred between cultivated and the wild progenitor and this concurs with one of the conclusions reached by Vaillancourt and Weeden 29 .The relatively high F IS mean value of 0.75 obtained across samples indicated that most accessions are inbred. Xiong et al. 7 also reported low heterozygosity among the 768 cowpea accessions used in their diversity study. These observations are to be expected since cowpea is a highly self-pollinated crop. Depending on the genotype and environment the extent of outcrossing in cowpea is low and could range from less than 0.15 to up to 1.58% 33 . However, He = 0.4344 in a population comprising 105 cowpea accessions from Kenya, Niger, Nigeria and China has recently been reported 34 . The sampled mini core accessions of the world cowpea collection maintained at IITA and used in the present study are distributed into three main clusters on the dendrogram generated following hierarchical cluster analysis. These three clusters are also identified by DAPC and ADMIXTURE. The distribution of the germplasm accessions into three main clusters in this study agrees with the findings by Xiong et al. 7 that reported a diverse set of 768 cowpea germplasm maintained at United States Department of Agriculture -Germplasm Resources Information Network (USDA-GRIN) formed three well defined groups and Qin et al. 35 who also found three clusters among 369 accessions belonging to the USDA's core collection. It can therefore be stated, based on the results of the present study, that the set of mini core lines we have used represent a significant amount of the diversity present in the world cowpea collection maintained at IITA. Hence, the test lines represent a broad picture of the crop's genetic diversity. It is also worth noting that the 369 USDA cowpea core collections came from 47 countries whereas the 298 mini core accessions we used are obtained from 50 countries.Two of the three groups formed in this study have most of their members collected from different parts of Africa thus agreeing with results by Chen et al. 34 who found that two of the four clusters from their study were made up of accessions from Niger and Nigeria and the other made of accessions from Kenya. The identification of three clusters (gene pools) each from America (North America and Latin America), the three regions of Africa (West and Central Africa, East and Southern Africa) and Central West Asia, Europe and Oceania were reported 7 . The composition of the three clusters identified in our study does not agree with these observations when sources of their origin are considered. Rather, our results align more with those of Huhyn et al. 5 in their study in which they identified three gene pools among 422 accessions that included 46 wild cowpea relatives.The presence of accessions from West and Central Africa especially Nigeria in each of the three groups is further evidence that the sub-region is a centre of diversity for cultivated cowpea 36 . Many authors have submitted that the center of diversity for cultivated cowpea is the West and Central African sub-region 2,37 from where it moved to the other parts of the world -Asia, North and South America and Europe 5,38 .The germplasm lines making up the bulk of IITA's cowpea mini core did not cluster according to countries of origin despite that geographical location along with agronomic and botanical descriptors were used to define the core collection 4 . However, many of the accessions from West and Central Africa constitute the majority of members in group two while most members of group three are from East and Southern Africa. Clustering of accessions according to countries of origin varies across crop species. For example, in African rice (Oryza glabberima), a self-pollinated crop like cowpea clustering of genotypes was more according to country of origin than to agro-ecology 39 whereas in lentil only a weak correlation was observed between geographic origin and genetic relationships among tested landraces 40 . Cowpea lines from Niger and Nigeria clustered together and separated from those collected from Kenya and China 34 . Clustering together of genotypes from Niger and Nigeria was attributed to their coming from similar agro-ecologies 34 . In their study Xiong et al. 7 reported no clustering of cowpea genotypes according to country of origin. However, geographic variation in germplasm distribution is nearly always impossible to separate from ecologically determined variation hence the recognition of 'ecogeographic factors' in plants' genetic diversity 41 . It is reasonable to believe that the cowpea germplasm lines have remained in West and Central Africa sub-region over a long period after having been domesticated there. The plants have become adapted to the agro-ecologies prevalent in the sub-region rather than countries especially since a common farming system of intercropping is mostly practised in the different countries. Also, the high level of self-pollination, as in cowpea, may have resulted in the rapid fixation of alleles and accumulation of mutant genes in tomato 42 . It is also worth noting that movement of seeds among farmers in the West and Central Africa sub-region is not limited by national boundaries as farmers in neighbouring communities exchange seeds freely with one another 39 and farmer-to-farmer seed movement has been recognised as a means of disseminating seeds of newly improved varieties.The genetic diversity within cluster two of which 92 percent of members are from West and Central Africa is lowest of the three clusters. Total genetic variation among cowpea accessions from outside of Africa was slightly greater than in the African landraces 5,34,35 . Low levels of precipitation in the areas of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where cowpea is mostly found may partly contribute to the relatively lower genetic diversity in lines from the region as compared to those from other parts of the world where more precipitation occurs. For example, an appreciable level of genetic diversity has been reported among yard-long-bean (V. unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) found mostly in the moist Asian countries especially China and India 43 . The yard-long-bean evolved in Asia from the cultivated cowpea introduced originally from the savannahs of SSA where they are not found. The greater precipitation and lower sunlight in Asia was suggested as being responsible for the evolution of the yard-long-bean from cowpea 5 . A relatively higher genetic diversity has been reported in tomatoes from the western Galapagos islands and this was attributed to the higher precipitation in the area 44 . It has also been suggested that plant species richness is correlated with annual precipitation as observed in the Neotropics 45 .In this study, members of the cluster with the most number of accessions (115 accessions) are from 27 countries 16 of which are from outside of Africa and 11 African countries. This also showed the highest level of genetic variation among the three clusters. The higher genetic variation observed among accessions in this most cosmopolitan cluster may be the result of the high number of countries from where the members are collected. Most genetic variance in the USDA cowpea world collection was found within, instead of, among geographic regions and within instead of among countries 7 .The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that highest variation was present among accessions followed by within accessions and smallest among clusters. Similarly, the highest amount of variation was found among individuals, followed by within individuals and least among populations 34 . There is therefore, in cowpea higher genetic divergence among individual accessions which could not be explained by the groups. However, in African rice molecular variance was reported to be highest within than among groups when based on structure and cluster analysis and the diversity could not be explained by ecology 39 .Accessions from the USA were distributed among different clusters but the most number were found in cluster one where they are found to be closely associated with accessions from West Africa thus suggesting that relatively high similarities exist between USA and West African lines. The observed 86% similarity between American breeding lines and accessions from West Africa agree with this observation 7 . It can be suggested that many parental lines used for making crosses in the USA while generating breeding lines may be of West African origin. Whit 46 suggested that cowpea came to the USA through slaves who may have brought them along from West Africa. We also observed that some USA lines are in close proximity with accessions from Egypt and India. This may justify the findings that some of the USA lines came through other sources than from only West Africa 5 . It had been suggested that cowpea germplasm was also dispersed from sub-Saharan Africa to Europe and elsewhere through Egypt in North Africa 47 .The bulk of cowpea accessions maintained in the Genetic Resources Center at IITA (>71%) are from Africa and would therefore be mostly landraces. These lines would to a very large extent represent the diversity present in the indigenous cultivated cowpea. The history of cowpea variety development in Africa is recent. Early reports on genetic studies in cowpea are from the USA and date back to early 1900s. Inheritance of several seed related traits in cowpea were the earliest reported studies from the USA 48,49 . Available records show that the work carried out at the Agricultural Research Station, Bihar, India in which crosses were made to generate segregating populations from where early maturing lines with economically desirable traits were selected may probably be one of the earliest in the history of cowpea variety development 50 . Although most cowpea is produced and consumed in Nigeria, only limited improvement activities were carried out in the country until 1960s. Widespread dissemination of improved varieties to farmers in the West Africa sub-region is even more recent and can be traced to the establishment in early 1980s of the Semi-Arid Food Grain Research and Development (SAFGRAD) Program with support from the USAID.This diversity study was carried out using genotyping by sequencing on a sub-set of the mini core from the world's largest assemblage of cowpea germplasm collections and the results further confirm West and Central Africa as center of origin for cowpea. Further, the constitution of the mini core collections was successful in encompassing the diversity that may be present in the cowpea gene bank maintained at IITA as three groups were identified which is in concurrence with previous diversity studies in cowpea. It can be inferred from the study therefore that SNP markers are effective in placing cowpea germplasm lines in appropriate clusters based on relationships at molecular level and with the current accumulation of genomic tools in cowpea the crop promises to benefit from the deployment of these tools especially in the development of new varieties that should meet the immediate and future challenges facing its productivity.Plant materials and DNA extraction. Seeds of the 370 accessions making up the cowpea mini-core collections were obtained from the IITA's Genetic Resources Center, sown in pots containing 5.0 kg top soil and placed in the screenhouse. DNA was extracted from a newly expanded young trifoliate leaf of emerged seedlings of each line using SDS method 51 with some modifications. DNA concentrations of samples were normalized and working solutions contained between 10-100 ng/µl. Ninety-five samples were placed in a 96 well plate. As a DNA quality measure, 5 µl of each of 10 samples in a plate were digested using EcoRI restriction enzyme and run on a 1% w/v agarose gel along with the λ HindIII size standards.Genome reduction for sequencing was achieved by digesting genomic DNA with the restriction enzyme, ApeKI, which recognizes a degenerate 5 bp sequence (GCWGC, where W can be A or T), and sequencing was performed following the standard procedure 14 . A total of about four 96-plex GBS libraries were constructed and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000. Due to unavailability of reference genome (as at the time of the sequencing), SNP variants were discovered using the UNEAK pipeline 18 (http:// www.maizegenetics.net/gbs-bioinformatics) as implemented in TASSEL Version: 5.0 52 (Version: 3.0.166 Date: April 17, 2014). In summary, reads were trimmed to a 64-bp length and unreliable markers filtered out using a network filter, designed to detect and eliminate markers showing unexpected relationships with others that could be a result of paralogous sequences and/or sequencing errors 18 . A total of 121,910 SNPs was called out of the UNEAK pipeline. The called SNPs were further filtered using TASSEL software 52 . SNPs with more than 20% missing data were removed as were those with minor allele frequency (MAF) below 0.05. Non-polymorphic markers i.e., having a variance close to 0 were identified (only six markers were discarded based on this criterion). SNPs resulting from sequence paralogy were further removed, resulting in a final set of 2,276 SNPs. Data analysis. Genetic diversity, population structure and phylogenetic analyses. Diversity analysis was carried out using the filtered 2,276 SNPs. Genetic diversity parameters which include minor allele frequency (MAF), polymorphic information content (PIC), the effective number of alleles (Ne), expected heterozygosity (He), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and inbreeding coefficient (Fis) were established using GenAlex version 6.41 53 , power marker 54 and PLINK 55 .Population structure was characterized using three complementary approaches: 1) distance-based hierarchical clustering analysis; 2) a model-based maximum likelihood estimation of ancestral sub-populations using ADMIXTURE 56 and 3) assumption-free discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) 57 . For the hierarchical clustering, the pairwise genetic distance (identity-by-state, IBS) matrix was calculated among all individuals using PLINK 55 . A Ward's minimum variance hierarchical cluster dendrogram was then built from the IBS matrix using the Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution (ape) package 58 implemented in R 59 .In the second approach, population structure and accession ancestry were determined using the ADMIXTURE method which assumes linkage equilibrium among loci and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium within ancestral populations 56 . For the analysis, the number of subpopulations, K, varied from 2 to 10. According to ADMIXTURE's cross-validation procedure a good value of K will exhibit a low cross-validation error compared to other K values 55 . Hence, the most appropriate K value that is useful and better describes the data and also has good correspondence with the clustering pattern obtained by the hierarchical tree, was selected after considering the 10-fold cross-validations.To complement the results from ADMIXTURE, we carried out DAPC using the R package 'adegenet' . The optimal number of clusters from DAPC was inferred using k-means analysis by varying possible number of clusters from two to 40 using a Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) to assess the best supported model. The number of clusters at which BIC decreases were considered to determine the most likely K value. Following the information based on hierarchical clustering and ADMIXTURE analysis the most appropriate K expected to provide useful summaries of the data was selected. DAPC clustering was thereafter performed on the clusters identified using the first 70 principal components. The membership probabilities of each individual for the different groups were obtained from DAPC and the results of DAPC analysis, ADMIXTURE, and the hierarchical tree were compared. As sub-clusters were observed within the mini core samples, the fixation index (F ST ) and standardized F ST (F' ST ,) of the observed sub-clusters were assessed using analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) implemented in GenAlex 6.41 and the genetic diversity parameters of each observed cluster determined. Genetic diversity parameters were also calculated for each of the identified sub-clusters."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1943653274.json b/main/part_2/1943653274.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02951dd34936f2eb516e6d786bba7b6d38416c29 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1943653274.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"042a694eebef9476b18006e1356fdc17","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6dae1b02-4035-4175-a61e-e3f67de3b03e/retrieve","id":"688912013"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6664a62f-a582-4600-b446-8bd2fc8830c8","content":"Designing of FAW and Striga agro-advisories and their delivery through a bulk SMS messaging to the farming communities in Rwanda. 11p.Rwanda is a predominantly agricultural country, and the agriculture sector employs over 70% of the population. The country's economy heavily relies on agriculture, which accounts for about 30% of the GDP (https://rdb.rw/investmentopportunities/agriculture/). However, pests such as Fall Armyworm and Striga have posed a significant challenge to agricultural productivity in the country. These pests cause massive crop losses, and farmers have been struggling to manage them.Monitoring and early warning systems are key pieces for the strategic management of fall armyworm (FAW).One Acre Fund in partnerships with The Rwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development in partnerships has been sending SMS to more than 20,000 Extension agents (Farmer promoters, Farmer field school facilitators, government extension officials at cell, sector and district levels) as an alternative approach of mobilizing, reminding and / or sensitizing on key agricultural activities before, during or after planting throughout the agricultural seasons (Season A: covers the period from August up to January; and season B: covers the period between February and June). Below are examples of SMS that have been sent to extension agents:• Hello, This is RAB. You are advised to take care of your maize crops because FAW is expected to occur in this season. Inform your fellow farmers too.• Hello, This is RAB. You are advised to take care of your soya and maize crops by planning to weed your field; including the removal of Striga. Inform your fellow farmers too.• Hello! This is RAB. We are requesting you to help farmers on post harvest handling for maize by preventing aflatoxin. They should avoid to dry their maize on bare soils and instead, use required sheetings. Thank you • Limited resources -Both the FFS system and the FP system face resource constraints that limit growth and effectiveness. The FFS system is resource and time intensive, which means it can only reach a limited number of farmers each season. The FP system is nationwide by design, but the impact and effectiveness of the system is hindered by limited resources for material distribution, training, and monitoring & evaluation.The development of an SMS platform tool that will be fed by FAW and Striga advisory services based on weather and climate information has been working towards the following communication capability goals:1. The ability for RAB to immediately communicate with individual farmers or groups of farmers as well as extension agents via SMS.2. The ability for farmers grouped into Twigire Muhinzi to communicate with RAB via SMS.The SMS platform as it is now, has proven to be an effective and efficient entry point to send SMS on FAW and Striga identification and management. It has been in place since 2014 and specific SMS on FAW and Striga using climate and weather data to identify high risk areas have been sent since 2022 with support from icipe.Below is how the approach works:The SMS were translated into Kinyarwanda and then sent to 4,662 farmer promoters after updating their database. SMS are sent once RAB had approved them.The goal of sending these SMS was to inform farmer promoters the likelihood of FAW and Striga occurrences in their respective villages so that they can then inform and train their fellow farmers how to identify and manage FAW and Striga. FP agreed to participate on the exercise whereas 1 declined to participate. 127 of the farmer promoters were female and 301 were male (Figure 2). Following districts were under high FAW • Given the fact that the dissemination of bundled-SMS is done using an existing platform, there is a need to continue working with relevant stakeholders and leverage on the capacity of the bundles to disseminate other additional advisories related to the right approach and timeline of applying pesticides, and mobilize farmers through farmer promoters to always wear protective equipment when spraying chemicals.• It is now planned that another map will be made during the upcoming agricultural season of 2024A to identify sectors in which farmer promoters will be sent another bundle SMS to advise on FAW and Striga identification and management.• On data collected on 8 th of May, a descriptive report will be provided by Dr Tobias from icipe."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1946970209.json b/main/part_2/1946970209.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5bcb0f1d9ef9ffda9d7e5bb7158ed0362fdd752 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1946970209.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6ac733126e0b6af75d861c34ae4f126e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/31ddb1f7-ff65-4e9e-b998-82787ab8ec32/retrieve","id":"-571141951"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"27d0b204-4b56-49ec-8473-41f039245a81","content":"In 1982 the International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) established a Livestock Policy Unit (LPU). Later it was given additional functions and changed its title to Livestock Economics Division (LED).The objectives of the LED are: 1. To heighten the awareness in African governments and in other organisations of the importance of livestock policy issues. 2. To collate in an easily assimilable form what is already known about policy issues and to present it to policy makers. 3. To carry out research of its own (including that commissioned from consultants) on priority livestock policy issues and to present the results to policy makers. 4. To encourage others to carry out similar research and to assist in presenting their results to policy makers.The classification and mapping of environmental units, and Figures 2 and 6, were undertaken by Dr. Beryl Turner (The Green, Litton, Skipton, Yorks, England). The remaining maps were designed and drawn by Mr. J. F. Antwi (Department of Geography, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria). The libraries of the Overseas Development Institute, London and of ILCA, Addis Ababa were made available for the author's use. In appendix 2 (Environmental Units) the size of each unit, in square kilometres, was estimated on the basis of the evidence presented in Figure 6 (A-H) by Assefa Eshete of ILCA's Resource Survey Unit.1. to regionalize the SAZ, on the basis of agroclimatic and other environmental parameters relevant to livestock production, into environmentally homogeneous units, to which particular mixed farming systems may be assigned.1. productivity -to increase output per hectare of livestock products and crops;* Unlike the market, which is also external to the household system, and other unmeasurable 'environmental' externals.(2) Definition of units. At the level of the household, Boulier and Jouve (1988: 55) distinguish four units: residential, consumption, accumulation and production units. They show how among six ethnic groups in West Africa, three different conformations of these units are found, and in only two of the groups are all four units coextensive. These differences have extension implications.1. Under smallholder conditions, farming intensity tends to correlate positively with rural population density.Staff members and consultants of the LED write working papers at several stages during their research on a topic. Publication of the final results of research may not occur until several years after the research started. The LED, therefore, makes its working documents available to anyone requesting them in order to provide access to data and ideas on African livestock policy issues as early as possible to those with a need for them. This is an LED working document. It has not been prepared in accordance with procedures appropriate to formal printed texts, and ILCA accepts no responsibility for errors. Both data and ideas are subject to revision. The views and interpretations in this document are those of the author and should not be attributed to ILCA. ILCA however retains copyright and reserves all other rights. Working paper numbers 1-10 appear under the ILCA/LPU working paper series, which has now been renamed as the LED working documents series.This electronic document has been scanned using optical character recognition (OCR) software and careful manual recorrection. Even if the quality of digitalisation is high, the FAO declines all responsibility for any discrepancies that may exist between the present document and its original printed version.1. The problem ILCA's interest in semi-arid mixed farming systems arises from the following arguments (ILCA Project Document, 11 April, 1988):1. mixed farming systems are of large and growing importance, not only because existing systems are expanding, but also because formerly specialist livestock or crop production systems are diversifying into crops and livestock respectively; 2. environmental degradation is believed to be proceeding faster in the semi-arid zone (SAZ) than in other ecological zones; and livestock have an important influence on this process; 3. real household incomes are believed to be low and declining; while livestock make a very significant contribution to incomes, directly through milk and meat output and other products, indirectly through manure, traction and other interactions with crop production, and as investments; and 4. there is a high potential for improved livestock technology targeted on improving productivity, stability, and sustainability of the farming systems.McIntire, Bourzat and Pingali's study, Crop-livestock interactions in sub-Saharan Africa (1989), is based on the fundamental hypothesis 'that different agroclimates and population densities make possible, and sometimes compel, specific interactions'. In spite of many project failures in livestock development, it is considered that 'the potential for integrated crop and animal production is high. What is required is appropriate analysis of the sequence in which interactions become profitable' (1-2,3). That study systematically investigates, in turn, livestock investment, animal traction, soil fertility maintenance, feed resources, animal production and byproducts. A two-dimensional analytical matrix of agroclimatic zones and population density is used. The analysis is organised around three economic relationships: (i) resource competition between crop and livestock production;(2) complementarily between the two activities; and (3) the circumstances promoting the evolution of mixed farming. The SAZ is one of five agroclimatic divisions of Africa identified by Jahnke (1982). The others are: the arid, subhumid and humid zones, and the highlands. Mixed farming systems are supposed not to occur in the arid zone.Following Jahnke's continental study of livestock production systems (Jahnke, 1982), and McIntire et al's systematic analysis of crop-livestock interactions and integration, there is now a need for an analytical review of the SAZ. Such a review is justified by the proportional importance of its livestock and human populations, its extent, and its diversity.The objectives of the present review are twofold:2. to propose a taxonomy of mixed farming systems; inventory a range of representative systems that are characterised in the literature; and review contemporary trends with respect to environmental management.The Study is intended to facilitate the targeting of ILCA's research programmes. It is assumed that such research is addressed to the following two objectives (among others): Using his definition of 90-180 days, Jahnke (1982) estimated that the SAZ contained the following human and livestock populations.Total (000s)Human agricultural populationCattleSheepGoatsRuminant livestock units (TLU)Total area (km 2 )4. Mixed farming systemsFor the purpose of this Study, mixed farming systems are understood to exist where both livestock and crop production take place within the same locality, and where ownership of crops or land and livestock are integrated. However, where specialised livestock production takes place in the same locality as crop production, subject to resource-sharing (e.g. grazing of residues), but under separate ownership, such systems may be included. Such flexibility is necessary because of the variety of arrangements that exist covering access to ownership, and management of land and livestock. It should also be noted that some mixed farming systems make use of farm trees for fodder.No smallholder farming systems have been found in the SAZ lacking a livestock component. Livestock ownership is valued by farmers because it offers the following utilities:1. investment capital, available for use in contingencies, relatively divisible; 2. individual wealth creation (including for women); 3. recurrent income (milk, meat and other products); 4. manure; (which, if supported by on-farm fodder, re-cycles nutrients at lower cost than inorganic fertilizers); 5. energy (traction, transport); and 6. productive uses for farm residuals (crop residues, browse, weeds, boundary plants, uncultivated grassland).It may be hypothesized that where feed resources, and household wealth, allow, some livestock populations will tend to rise along with the human population, on a per ha basis. Where common property grazing resources are available, the principal constraint on livestock holdings, at the level of the individual household, is likely to be not farm feed supply, but poverty, either necessitating sales, or precluding purchases of animals. It does not seem easy to establish whether a farming system is overloaded with livestock, or can accommodate more animals.Livestock provide a least-cost route to intensification through their role in nutrient cycling, especially if inorganic fertilizers are increasing in cost. Although mulching and residue incorporation offer technically efficient alternatives, it is unlikely that they are as efficient in their use of labour (McIntire et al, 1989) and they offer none of the additional benefits of livestock ownership (1-3 above).The upper limit to nutrient cycling by livestock is set by the amount of feed that the system can generate, or purchase with the proceeds of market output. The upper limit to crop output is set by the fertilization provided by the animals, or purchased with the proceeds of market output. How far such an integrated system can go under smallholder conditions in the SAZ is not known. It is widely believed that animals depend mainly on natural pastures, and the declining quantity and quality of these prevents the production of adequate manure for sustaining yields on arable land.Recent drought experiences in Africa have emphasized the complementary roles of livestock and crops in maintaining household viability. During crop failures, livestock offer diversified economic options and support smallholder resilience. On the other hand, livestock specialists who have lost all or part of their stock may take up or increase their commitment to farming.In some areas, increasing privatization of grazing or other resources by capitalized entrepreneurs is supporting intensified market integration in the livestock sector, and at the same time restricting access to these resources by smallholders. Households that specialise in livestock may become marginalised, that is to say their livestock holdings fall below the threshold of household self-sufficiency. Mixed farming offers such households a more productive mode of using land (where it is scarce), more defensible access to resources, a more diversified (and hopefully, resilient) household economy, and an alternative source of investment funds for rebuilding livestock holdings.There is now an increasing awareness of the risks of environmental degradation in the SAZ. This justifies a holistic approach to mixed farming systems and their impact on the environment. While animals are often blamed for degradation, they may, on the other hand, be an essential component of intensification, which creates in turn the economic conditions for conservationary land management.Much past expansion in the commercial output of both crops and livestock has been supported by increased use of land at low inputs of capital and labour. With the diminution of unoccupied land, the transfer of increasing areas of natural vegetation to arable, and intensified competition between grazing and cultivating systems for the available land, farming systems are confronted with a choice between:1. a degradational pathway -increasing the frequency of use without additional inputs, failing to replenish soil chemical properties or to conserve physical properties, and 2. a conservationary pathway -increasing inputs, especially of labour, to maintain or raise productivity per ha.The literature on the SAZ alludes frequently to two kinds of system-crises:1. The crisis of pastoralism is the loss of land (via alienation, and arable encroachment, compounded in some areas by private ranching enclosures) plus the growth of human and livestock populations -a Malthusian trap, except where possibilities for dispersal exist. 2. The crisis of extensive farming is the shortening of fallow cycles in relation to the restorative needs of the soils, together with the reduction of the ratio between common property (or open access) natural grazings, on the one hand, and private arable fields, on the other, on which ratio the system of nutrient transfers by means of livestock coralling on arable land depends. Soil fertility is thus expected to decline on both permanent and rotationally fallowed fields.It is important to determine the extent to which crop-livestock integration offers solutions to these perceived crises. With regard to the crisis of pastoralism, in areas with adequate rainfall to support farming (i.e. the SAZ), there is evidence that smallholder mixed farming is emerging.With regard to the crisis of extensive farming, evidence from the Kano Close-Settled Zone, Nigeria (Mortimore, 1990) suggests that mixed farming (agro-forestry with livestock) can be sustainable under indigenous technical practice in the medium term. The replicability of such a system in other parts of the SAZ, and under drier rainfall conditions, is not known.The choice of pathway, therefore, is not only relevant to environmental management per se but gives an indication of the future evolution of the system under conditions of continuing population growth.Land is differentiated locally in terms of the catenary sequence from interfluve to valley bottom. McIntire et al (1989) argue that 'as population densities increase, people intensify production on the mid to upper slopes, move to marginal lands in the upper slopes, or move down the slope. Each option implies some investment in erosion or water control. Typically, the payoff to these investments is highest on the lower slopes and valley bottoms. Therefore, where lower slopes and valley bottoms are available, population growth induces intensification on those lands'.There is much evidence to support this thesis of intensification down the catena, as densities rise.The corollary is that marginal land on the upper slope, which is more exposed to erosion under natural conditions and may contain hardpan, rock outcrops or thin stony soils, becomes a residual category, because it provides the lowest payoff to intensification. It is often this land that provides visible evidence of degradation in the form of bare surfaces, soil stripping, surface gravel or rock and degraded vegetation communities.Such residual land is grazed by livestock during the wet season, when the stock must be kept off farmlands, rather than during the dry, when crop residues and valley bottom grazings offer superior nutrition. Neither 'improved' management nor rehabilitation is economic under prevailing conditions; only further increases in population density and prices can create suitable conditions. This case explains why costly schemes to stabilise sand dunes or rehabilitate degraded soils may have little attraction for local resource managers.The degradation-conservation spectrum is therefore likely to exhibit much local variation, according to the intrinsic properties of different categories of land, and the way these are perceived by the resource managers.Land is subject to conflicting claims, for example as potential arable (farmers), as grazing, fodder or browse (livestock producers), or as a source of wood fuel, medicines or food (householders). One person's grazing is another's irrigation opportunity. The resolution of such competition may call for complex rules of access within the bounds of a single farming system, as in the following hypothetical example: (Note: Common access is restricted to community members; open access is unrestricted.)In addition, over large areas of the SAZ, community access is subject to legislative restrictions imposed by national or local governments in order to separate ethnic claims to territory. Such restrictions are common in eastern and southern Africa, where not only was land (much of it high potential) alienated for European settlement, but also it has been the practice at various times and places to confine ethnic groups to rangeland territories -for example, in Kenya and in Southern Ethiopia. By contrast, in large areas of the west and north, the division of land between farming and pastoral specialists, or amongst farmers, is subject only to customary allocative control.The existence and nature of confining boundaries should not be ignored in examining questions of environmental management. Furthermore, the status of customary land tenure is fluid in several areas. Under present economic and political conditions, this should cause concern, especially where farming systems with a livestock component are concerned.The approach of the present Study is to inventory and review the mixed farming systems of the SAZ, in a typological framework, and to disaggregate the SAZ regionally on the basis of agroclimatic and other environmental criteria. An attempt will then be made to marry these two lines of investigation in terms relevant to ILCA's needs.Chapter 2 reviews alternative bases for a typology of mixed farming systems. In Chapter 3 the regional disaggregation of the SAZ is described. Chapter 4 reviews and classifies the mixed farming systems. Conclusions and summary are in Chapter 5.This chapter discusses the conceptualization of the farming system with reference to the livestock component and reviews some alternative typologies that have been employed or proposed. A typological framework that is consistent with ILCA's objectives is then outlined.It is essential to clarify the conceptualization of the farming system as it relates to the objectives of the present Study.Farming systems may be analysed at four levels (Tourte, 1984):1. the field or flock/herd 2. the management unit ('unité de production ou exploitation') 3. the community ('collectivité rurale') 4. the territory ('petite région naturelle' or 'grande région')At the level of the management unit, livestock and crop production may be regarded as subsystems of the same farming system. Traditional farm management studies operate at this level, and extension services are aimed at decision makers at this level, who are responsible for factor allocations. According to Jahnke (1982: 5), the individual farm Unit is the 'building block' of a production system: 'A livestock production system in the simplest sense is then nothing but a group of similar management units'.There are however, four reasons why neither of the first two levels is adequate for the analysis of farming systems having a livestock component in the SAZ.(1) External resources. Livestock operations depend heavily on resources (common or open access grazings, browse, and water) outside the arable farm. At the level of the household or management unit such resources have to be treated as externals whose boundaries and capacity, because shared, cannot be defined. Yet they are not infinite*, and the manner of their use has an important bearing on the sustainability of the system. Cook et al (1984) argue that householdoriented approaches, if they fail to investigate the impact of these externalities on households and their feedback relationships, may run the risk of promoting interventions that contribute to the degradation of the environment.(3) Bounds of units. In livestock management, loaning, sharing, entrustment and other transactions are common; an owner sometimes does not manage all or any of his livestock and a manager may not own all or any of his flock or herd. Furthermore, patterns vary between seasons and from year to year.(4) Economic differentiation. It is well known that livestock ownership tends towards inequality, notwithstanding various mechanisms for redistribution within the community. This arises from the fact that livestock are (a) a form of investment producing a current income (in which they resemble farm land) and also (b) a self-reproducing asset (in which they differ from farmland). Inequality may be expressed both in the numbers of livestock (e.g. cattle) owned per household or per individual, and in the type owned (cf. cattle versus sheep or goats). In mixed farming, livestock may be owned by all or by only some farm units, whereas it is uncommon within an ethnic group for land ownership to be similarly restricted. Thus the presence of a nonowning sub-group, and the greater and cumulative inequality that often characterises livestock ownership, differentiates the livestock component from the crop component of a mixed farming system. It makes poor sense to exclude non-owning units from the production system, since they live among the livestock owners, interact with them, and may re-enter or drop out from the livestock-owning segment from year to year.For these reasons it may be questioned whether 'management units which are similar in their structure and in their production functions' accurately describes mixed farming households, and whether they can simply be grouped into an hierarchical farm system (Jahnke, 1982: 52). The concept of the system has to incorporate diversity even competing interests, at the level of the community.The community level, on the other hand, allows common access resources to be explicitly quantified and their management institutions to be identified. At this level, conflict or competition in the demand for common access resources must be resolved. The community (a village, hamlet, clan or kinship group) has rights to arable land, grazings, woodland, water and wildlife in areas that may not necessarily be contiguous. But in principle, the community system is capable of analysis in terms of soils, hydrology and agro-climatic potential.At the level of territory. In addition to the diversity contained at the level of the community, functionally or ethnically distinct communities cohabiting a given area for a part or all of the year (e.g. Fulani nomadic cattle breeders and Hausa sedentary farmers) may be analysed explicitly in terms of interaction, contracts, competition and complementarily in resource exploitation. Open access resources must be addressed explicitly at this level of analysis.Environmental and agro-climatic potential can be related to human and livestock populations, and ecological sustainability. Such a territory may be defined as an agro-climatic unit, a river basin or ecosystem; or as an administrative unit.From the practical standpoint of livestock production and environmental management, a level of analysis higher than that of the single management unit is desirable, for the following reasons:1. Livestock, being mobile, are not confined within the boundaries of the farm unit, and may graze or be fed on feed obtained from resources exogenous to the farm unit, but within the community area of territory. 2. Common or open access resources are subject to management decisions and regulations which are derived from custom, negotiation, or administrative dictate at the community or territorial level, and these are relevant to the question of sustainable resource management. 3. Interactions amongst dissimilar livestock and non-livestock breeding communities, exploiting ethnically or functionally defined niches in the same ecological territory, are also relevant to defining the impact of livestock on the environment. 4. Discrete territories may be used, not only by individual livestock keeping units, but in combination with others; the concept of the system has to take in such spatially dispersed patterns of resource use.From the standpoint of environmental management, the territorial level of analysis is appropriate, and later in this study a framework of agro-ecological units is proposed for this purpose. Except where a single community operates a homogeneous farming system, such a territory will encompass a mix of farming systems. From a systems typological standpoint, the extent of dissimilarity amongst systems that may exist in a single territory is unmanageable, and therefore the community level is preferred. The level of the single management unit is only appropriate when crop-livestock integration is complete and the use of common or open access resources insignificant.The levels described above are defined in terms of area as follows: Water resources for livestock may be controlled at the level of the management unit or the community, or be uncontrolled under open access; this has many implications.In their current phase, four of ILCA's six research thrusts are planned to have substantial involvement in the SAZ (ILCA, 1987):1. small ruminant meat and milk 2. animal traction 3. animal feed resources 4. livestock policy and resource use.Recurrent themes in the research topics proposed for these thrusts are:1. production systems, crop-livestock integration and productivity 2. feed resources and management 3. technologies, including draft 4. breeding, reproduction 5. stability and sustainability 6. markets, prices, credit.Given such a diversity of research objectives, it is legitimate to ask whether a multipurpose typology is a practicable objective. It cannot serve every need.The justification for a typology arises from the need to order diversity, as a step towards improved understanding. It is known that livestock producers in the SAZ vary on at least seven scales:1. household dependency on livestock 2. market integration of the livestock enterprise 3. herding movements 4. interactions with farmers 5. integration of crop and livestock production 6. size (and value) of livestock holdings 7. types and breeds of animals kept.However Jahnke's advice is that to derive groupings from 'a theory of their differentiation (e.g. the distance from the market or factor proportions available) results in a typology that reflects too narrow a spectrum of reality... judgement and pragmatism must still take precedence over principle and rigour' (Jahnke, 1982: 4). Jahnke therefore adapts Ruthenberg's functional classification to the specifications of livestock production. Before following down this road of theoretical agnosticism, a brief review of some available topologies is given.This review concludes that a number of existing or proposed typologies the functional farming systems of Ruthenberg, classifications based on economic specialisation or livestock dependency, typologies of herd movements, systems based on livestock ratios or characteristics of animal traction -have either theoretical or practical limitations from the standpoint of the present Study. A proposal is made to develop McIntire et al's (1989) sequence of crop-livestock interaction and integration into a tool for inventorying mixed farming systems. But the large number of component elements make an aggregated 'integration score' rather meaningless. Finally, a typology based on farming intensity is proposed, which includes four major types: intensive farming, enclave grazing, enclave farming and grazing. Such a typology has a strong theoretical basis and provides a framework for assigning environmental sustainability ratings to mixed farming systems.Ruthenberg (1980)used a 7-fold typology of tropical farming systems in which crop-livestock interactions may be summarised as follows:System Interactions (1980). Livestock are rarely differentiated: cattle most often seem to be implied by the context. Types l, 2, 4 and 7(b) occur in the SAZ and may qualify for the designation 'mixed farming'. But this general functional typology is not ideal for present purposes because it does not derive from differences in the livestock component of the systems, nor from the nature of crop-livestock interactions, but from differences in cropping practice. Its implications for environmental management are not clear either.Jahnke (1982: 7), however, follows Ruthenberg in proposing the following five classes of livestock production systems in tropical Africa: The interest of the present study mainly concerns the second class, and then only in the SAZ. Jahnke does not propose a subdivision of this class but suggests four gradients, that could conceivably be used as the basis for such a subdivision:1. agroclimate (cropping system), 2. population pressure (cultivation intensity) 3. tsetse challenge 4. livestock dependency (density, species)The first three will be incorporated in the environmental disaggregation of the SAZ (Chapter 3); the last is considered below.Wilson et al (1983), working in Mali, recognise three classes of dependency on livestock on the basis of household revenue or food energy derived from livestock-related activities;1. pastoral > 50% gross household revenue or > 20% food energy 2. agro-pastoral 10-50% gross revenue (i.e., > 50% derived from crops or non-agricultural activities)3. agricultural < 10% gross revenue (i.e., > 90% derived from crops or non-agricultural activities)Gross revenue is defined as the value of subsistence plus marketed production, plus the value of transport animals, traction and manure. The study was carried out in Mali, but Swift (nd: 1990?) has proposed to generalise such a classification.For present purposes, this classification has two limitations: first, household level (management unit) output and income data are not sufficiently widely available in the SAZ; and second, as explained above, the management unit level of analysis does not satisfy the requirements of the present investigation. Also, a finer mesh is needed to capture the diversity contained in the second and third classes. In a study of the livestock economy of northern Nigeria, Fricke (1979) proposed an elaborate 'social-agrarian-geographical' typology of cattle keeping systems. The resulting typology is, however, complex, and the 4 classes and 23 subclasses are not all empirically related in his study to identifiable groups in northern Nigeria, still less are they capable of easy quantification or mapping. The social overburden of this scheme renders it impracticable for extension beyond the Nigerian context, and marginal to the management focus of the present study. Baxter (1977) and other writers on East African pastoralism use the following typology of pastoral peoples:1. 'Pure' pastoralists who do not cultivate (subdivided into (a) those producing for the wider economy and (b) those only marginally involved in the wider economy); 2. primarily pastoral people, frequently transhumant, who cannot subsist by their stock alone (often called agro-pastoralists); and 3. primarily agricultural people who maintain strong pastoral values.In the wider context of livestock production, the emphasis on 'values' calls for a fourth type to be added to this scheme: 4. agriculturalists who also keep livestock.Such a scheme cannot adequately cope with the variety of mixed farming systems. While it appears to apply at the community level, recent events in parts of East Africa (impoverishment by war or drought losses) suggest that within a given community, households may end up in different classes, according to their livestock wealth. Households may also (presumably) reclassify themselves as they lose or reconstitute their herds through time.A typology based on the degree of dependency on livestock may be expected to yield important insights on the choice of economic options at the household level. But it does not directly confront the relations between the livestock and crop production subsystems and the impact of management practices on the environment.Wilson et al (1983) reject using livestock movements as the basis for classifying livestock production systems in Mali because although the nature of such movements is an important aspect of the system, it is contingent upon it, and diverts attention from the degree of dependency on livestock. It may be noted that the movements of cattle may be quite different from those of small ruminants, whose importance in mixed farming systems is sometimes greater.On the other hand, Van Raay (1974) argued a consistent relationship -in northern Nigeriabetween the movement patterns and socio-economic characteristics of the Fulani stockowners. While this typology is sufficiently closely related to management to have potential as a framework for policy, its usefulness may be restricted outside the Fulani-occupied areas of West Africa.The ratios between cattle and small ruminants would have obvious practical value in extension work, and within a homogeneous cultural area (such as Fulani areas of West Africa). They would be useful proxy indicators of such variables as household livestock wealth, movement patterns, and extent of commitment to farming. They are also relatively sensitive to short-term dynamics in animal ownership, responding (for example) to cycles of impoverishment and reconstitution, following periods of drought-induced mortality or destocking. However from the standpoint of research targeting, such a dynamic indicator may be insufficiently stable in the medium term (10-15 years).Ratios between breeds would be of interest from a breeding or nutritional perspective, but they provide only very indirect indicators of system properties, unless combined with other variables.For a typology applicable throughout the SAZ, livestock ratios suffer the fatal flaw of rarely being known on a comparable basis. Since census data are either unreliable, or insufficiently detailed, in most countries, the only source of data is low level aerial surveys. Where these have been carried out, livestock ratios may be available on a country or subregional basis, but unless they can be linked to herd or management units, they remain a poor guide to system operations.Animal traction appears to lend itself to a taxonomy of mixed farming systems, because more is known about systems using animal draft power than about others (Munzinger, 1982;Starkey and Ndiame, 1988). The presence or absence of draft, the frequency of draft using or owning management units, the relative importance of different draft animals (oxen, donkeys, horses) and the size of plough team or span all suggest themselves as possible taxonomic criteria. Such a classification would have obvious value for animal traction research and extension. (See: Munzinger, 1982) Ownership (as distinct from hiring) of draft cattle has implications for the size of the herd and milk output, especially in Southern Africa where spans of 6 or 8 oxen are used. McIntire et al. (1989: Chap. 4), investigating the hypothesis that animal traction is the central element of crop-livestock integration, failed to find a general association between animal traction and other techniques, and concluded that the role of draft power is badly understood. Certainly the determinants of the pattern of adoption of animal traction cannot be generalised for tropical Africa as a whole. Its impact on the farming system is difficult to separate from that of other variables. In West Africa, its implications for the livestock component of the farm system are quite different depending on whether draft power is owned or hired. In Ethiopia, the use of draft power is ancient, and apparently unrelated to commercialisation. In Botswana, cattle owning mixed farmers have adopted the plough for subsistence production, using teams of a size that, had they been necessary, would certainly have curtailed adoption of the technology in a noncattle owning society in West Africa.Animal traction characteristics, therefore, are not suitable as criteria for a general taxonomy of mixed farming systems.This issue is central to improving land productivity in the SAZ. It is integral to labour intensification, for which the necessary condition is population growth. A large literature supports the thesis that rural population density explains a high proportion of the observed variation in smallholder farming intensity (defined in terms of frequency of cultivation cycles and labour inputs per ha) in tropical Africa. In the SAZ, livestock are usually a central component in such intensification under smallholder conditions.McIntire et al (1989) argue strongly that 'farming intensity and crop-livestock interactions increase with population growth and with market infrastructure. The intensification of animal production allows more interactions: farmers invest in cattle, herders manage them, stock eat more crop residues and byproducts, and produce more manure'. Crop-livestock interaction follows an inverted U-pattern through time. 'First, specialised farming and herding societies that trade products give way to mixed farming societies, in which cropping and animal activities are in the same management unit. This movement to mixed farming, which we call the first transition, occurs when opportunities for using less labour intensive techniques of soil fertility maintenance are exhausted as population densities increase, and as the opportunity cost of labour rises. The latter encourages farm mechanization, usually via animal traction; as draft power becomes more valuable, crop farmers start to manage livestock and herders begin to cultivate. As exogenous markets and technologies develop further, there is a reverse movement away from integration and towards specialization, which we call the second transition. These technical changes -fertilizers replacing manure, tractors replacing animals, and supplements replacing fodder crops and pastures -eliminate the cost advantages for a mixed enterprise to provide some of its own inputs. As population density rises, causing land pressure, resource competition occurs within the farm which induces further specialization'.On the basis of such an hypothesis the following sequence of types can be suggested:Increasing market Integration [] Such a scheme must apply at the level of the territory, because in the early stages of the sequence, interactions occur between specialist (community level) systems. In practice, types 1, 4 and 5 are rare in the SAZ, leaving only types 2 and 3 to represent rather a wide range of diversity.At the community level, specific elements of the system may be inventoried and a score assigned on the basis of a scale of integration numbered 0-3, as follows:Integration score * See definition on the ''Economic differentiation'' section. This scheme will be applied to the systems inventoried later in the Study. An aggregate score can be assigned to a system. An absence of any significant indicators of crop-livestock integration will produce a total of 0; the highest possible score is 24. However it is doubtful if such a score will have more than an academic value. It is the ratings for individual elements that have practical significance.There are strong grounds for attempting to base a typology on farming intensity (frequency of cultivation cycles, or labour inputs per ha):2. Observations support the thesis that in the SAZ, farming intensity tends to correlate positively with crop-livestock integration. 3. The more frequent the cultivation cycle, the shorter the fallow cycle tends to become, eventually threatening the sustainability of the fallow system and calling for alternative methods of soil fertility maintenance. 4. A growing population with shortening fallows is expressed in a negative change in the grazing: arable land ratio. This, it is often argued, threatens the viability of the system of arable fertilization via nutrient transfer by grazing animals. 5. Given the value of livestock, the ease of acquisition of small ruminants, and low costs of maintenance under conditions of common access grazing, an increase in the small livestock population is often a corollary of growth in the human population. On the other hand, cattle densities fall when grazing and fodder are scarce.The cultivated percentage provides an indicator of farming intensity (the higher the percentage, the more frequent the cycle of cultivation and the higher the labour inputs per ha). Von Kaufman et al (1983), writing with primary reference to the sub-humid zone, argue that the 'land use factor' (Allen, 1965) 3, Hendy (1977), in a study of animal production in the Kano Close-Settled Zone, Nigeria, plotted the human population/km 2 against livestock/km 2 and livestock/head of human population. The density of about 80 persons/km had a threshold significance. At lower densities of the human population, the numbers of cattle, donkeys, sheep and goats/km 2 all rose with the human population density, and also rose on a per capita basis. Above the density of 80 persons/km 2 , cattle numbers fell on a per capita basis and the other animals showed no clear trend. This meant that they increased in density/km 2 , whereas cattle densities declined. A human population density of about 80/km 2 , in Northern Nigeria at the time when Hendy's data were obtained (late 1960s), corresponded to a cultivated percentage of about 70 (Mortimore, 1970).Areas above this figure are assigned to Type 3.More recent work by ILCA shows that cattle densities increase with those of the human population until the cultivated percentage reaches about 50 (in the Nigerian Sub-Humid Zone) and about 25 (in the SAZ); thereafter they decline. Above a cultivated percentage of 85, fallows and common access grazing virtually disappear, residual land being mainly used for settlements, rivers, roads, etc; this may be recognised as a sub-type of Type 3, but it is rare to find such high intensities (densities of population over 150/km 2 ) in the SAZ, and there is no evidence of a significant change in livestock management at this level.With regard to Types 1 and 2, work in the Maradi area of Niger (Gregoire and Raynaut, 1980) indicates that at a regional population density of 30/km 2 , and a cultivated percentage in the range 35-65, fallows are insufficient to maintain the fertility of arable land. The livestock supported by the grazings and farm residues provide manure for only 25% of the cultivated area. There is a shortage of land and of fodder, and by implication, of fallows and manure. This area may be assigned therefore to Type 2. In their analysis of the impact of drought on six farming systems in semiarid West Africa, Boulier and Jouve (1988) discern no land shortage in systems operating at human population densities of 10/km 2 or less. This corresponds to a cultivated percentage of about 10-20, at 1-2 ha/person. Such an area can be assigned to Type 1.The level of analysis for such a categorisation is that of the community or the territory. The model takes no account of uncultivable land and river valley land, (bas-fond, dambo, fadama, flood plain etc.). The first is included in uncultivated land and is assumed to be available for grazing. However, where the percentage of uncultivable land is high, ceiling is set on the cultivable percentage, lowering the threshold percentages for Types l and 2 accordingly. As for river valley land, its effect depends on whether its predominant use is for cultivation, or for dry season grazing. If the first, the grazing sector is weakened; if the second, strengthened.Adjustments could be made for local situations.The model is based on West African experience and requires verification. The national livestock census, presently in progress in Nigeria, may provide an opportunity to test the model in a range of ecologies and human densities.None of these types has necessary consequences for degradation or conservation, and therefore one cannot be said to be more sustainable than another. Sustainability depends on:1. the nature of the cropping system, with regard to the protection of the physical and chemical properties of the soil; 2. the level of stocking; 3. the management of localised pressure points such as overgrazed village peripheries, denuded environs of water sources, exposed topographical sites (steep slopes, wind-blown crests); and 4. annual variability in rainfall and vegetation cover.However, if these variables are known, the typology provides a framework for assigning environmental sustainability ratings to mixed farming systems. There is plenty of evidence that the choice between a sustainable or degradational pathway involves decisions about labour allocation, and that under conditions of scarce capital, labour-intensive sustainable systems can only evolve where population density is high or increasing.Since the typological sequence suggested above is fundamentally related to population density, as is the integration sequence of McIntire et al, it may be expected that both sequences, if found valid, will correlate in practice. Farming intensity (expressed as the cultivated percentage) therefore emerges as the most powerful typological principle for the purpose of understanding both crop-livestock interaction/integration and environmental management.The need for a regionalisation of the SAZ arises from its environmental heterogeneity (p. 2). A large number of variables is available, offering many alternative schemes. The interests of potential users have varying scale requirements, from continental divisions to sub-national administrative areas. To cope with this diversity, this Chapter develops a regionalisation of the SAZ of sub-Saharan Africa at four levels.A first order subdivision is made between 'west and north' (W & N) and 'east and south' (E & S) regions on basic geographical properties. A second order subdivision of each region into four LGP sub-zones is based on data from the FAO. Population density, land use and potential population supporting capacities (with many intermediate variables) have been computed for these sub-zones on a country basis, and land inventory data on 16 soil constraints are available. Recognising that country-based LGP zones are not ideal for all purposes, a third order subdivision into sub-regions (16 in number) is based on three broad agroclimatic criteria: moisture and rainfall regimes and the monthly patterns of peak rainfall. At this level, some modifications are proposed to the SAZ as delimited by the FAO. Finally, the sub-regions are broken down into fourth order environmental units, 83 in number.This subdivision embodies the contrast between the relative uniformity and continuity of the W & N region on the one hand, and the diversity and discontinuity of the E & S region on the other. At a gross level of generalisation, the W & N region (from Senegal to the Sudan) can be characterised in terms of the following properties:(1) a lowland plains topography;(2) a uniform, unimodal rainfall regime;(3) a transitional location between the Sahara Desert and the Subhumid Zone, reflected in a strong latitudinal bias in most ecological distributions;(4) spatial and ecological continuity across its entire breadth;(5) horizontal (south-north) aridity gradients and associated dispositions of tsetse;(6) a history of cultural interaction, including the co-residence, in the same territories, of specialist pastoralists and farmers, with resource-sharing agreements;(7) an absence of colonial land alienation, and the spatial continuity of its farming systems.The SAZ of eastern Africa is very different, having:(1) both highland and lowland areas;(2) both bimodal and unimodal rainfall regimes;(3) a weak relationship between ecology and latitude, and abrupt ecological gradients, owing to highlands;(4) a discontinuous spatial distribution;(5) both vertical (altitudinal) and horizontal (multi-directional) aridity gradients, and complex associated patterns of tsetse challenge;(6) a lack of notable historical uniting influences, with pastoralists and farmers often separated and competing for resources;(7) extensive land alienation under colonial rule (in some countries), and discontinuous, diverse, sometimes isolated, or administratively confined farming systems.The SAZ in southern Africa does not conform in all respects with the eastern African pattern. There is less highland, stronger latitudinal control, and more consistent ecological gradients. But it contains a comparatively small proportion of the African livestock (and human) populations.Since the E & S region is defined essentially in terms of its diversity, it makes practical sense for present purposes to include southern with eastern Africa, at this level of generalisation, It is implicit in the foregoing that there are limits to the transferability of research and experience between the W & N and the E & S regions.LGP sub-zones FAO land inventory data, and variables used for estimating population supporting capacities in the study carried out jointly by the FAO and IIASA (FAO, 1980;1982), are available for LGP sub-zones broken down by thermal zone and by country. The sub-zones are: When overlaid on national territories, the variables listed above generate a three-dimensional matrix of more than a hundred cells. The data relevant to the present study are summarised in Appendix 3. These have been selected from a list of 16 soil constraints and 29 population and productivity related variables.Leaving aside the thermal zones, which have less relevance for livestock production systems, some of the data on the LGP sub-zones are aggregated at the regional level in Table 3.1. The FAO offers the only source of standardised physical land inventory, land use, and productivity data for all of sub-Saharan Africa, though the time-base for these data is 1975, and their reliability can be no better than that of the primary sources used.According to FAO (1978: 98-9) the growing periods are classified as follows with regard to agroclimatic suitability for the major crops, pearl millet, sorghum and maize, at existing (low) input levels:LGP * Suitability classes: NS -not suitable; MS -marginally suitable; S -suitable; VS -very suitable.In the two drier sub-zones (75-119 days LGP), millet is the most suitable staple crop. However, the correspondence between these suitability ratings and actual practice may not be very close. For example, if the LGP isolines are superimposed on a map of major crop regions in the Francophone West African countries (Figure 4), it appears that other factors besides agroclimatic suitability (so defined) have influenced the pattern. 1. The amount of agricultural land available allows for deducting estimated nonagricultural land from total land.2. Cropland and rangeland do not add up to agricultural land available. We assume that the balance is unused.See Appendix 2. Functions linking LGP sub-zones with livestock-related variables have not been developed. Two variables of obvious importance are pasture production and availability of suitable crop residues.On the first, Le Houérou (1985) has proposed a link between annual rainfall and the production of dry matter above the ground, or rain use efficiency factor (RUE: kg DM mm -1 ha -1 yr -1 ). Studies in the Sahel yield averages ranging from 2.2 to 3.6, and in East Africa, from 3.2 to 6.0. He cautions, however, that differences in the length of the growing season between the unimodal rainfall regimes of the Sudano-Sahelian region and the bimodal regimes of East Africa cause fundamental differences in range type, composition and forage quality during the annual cycle. More work is therefore necessary before linkages between LGP and forage availability can be stated with any confidence.Sub-zones based on the use of LGP as a sole criterion do not take account of other agroclimatic variables. Thermal zones, or a general climatic classification, could be used to break the SAZ down into smaller units having more internal homogeneity. Figure 5, for example, shows the SAZ superimposed on a climatic classification employed for the Soil Map of Africa (UNESCO, 1977). No less than six tropical climates, three sub-tropical, two 'tierra fria' and a desert climate are represented. Or, the six thermal zones of the FAO land inventory could be used. But the relevance of general climatic classifications, or thermal zones, to livestock production is less evident than that of individual variables. Of these, the most important are moisture regime (LGP), modal type (unimodal versus bimodal regimes), and monthly patterns of peak rainfall.The FAO (1990) has recommended that the 120-day LGP isoline should demarcate the moist from the dry semi-arid zones: In the E & S, the same distinction produces a complex spatial pattern having less usefulness for regional subdivision, though the importance of such distinctions for farming systems is clear at the micro-regional level (see, for example, Jaetzold and Schmidt, 1982).This property has a significance for farming systems second only to that of the growing period. Following Leroux (1983), the SAZ can be subdivided on this basis. Unimodal regimes occur throughout the W & N region (with the exception of a small area of Mauritania, which it has been decided to ignore), and in NW Ethiopia, in the E & S region. Bimodal regimes occur throughout the E & S region from NE Ethiopia to Tanzania. From Tanzania (which is transitional) until the Tropic is reached, unimodal regimes occur. In the sub-tropical part of the E & S region, unimodal regimes occur in S. Mozambique, E. Swaziland, and Madagascar, but complicating factors extend the length of the rainy season in S E Botswana and W. Lesotho.In the W & N region, under unimodal regimes and strong latitudinal influence, August is the peak month in normal years. In the E & S region, the latitudinal range of the SAZ (from 15°N to 30°S), and the influence of highland masses, create considerable variability in the monthly patterns of peak rainfall. These variations need to be taken into account in proposing sub-regions of homogeneous agroclimatic properties.Before combining the above three variables into a scheme of agroclimatic sub-regions, it is appropriate to examine some anomalies in the definition of the SAZ which arise near the upper (180 days LGP) and lower (75 days LGP) limits. In several locations the reliability of these limits, as indicators of semi-arid ecological conditions for farming systems, may be questioned.The following functional modifications to the SAZ are therefore proposed, for the reasons given (see Figure 1; and the boundaries shown in Figure 6 (A-H):1. W & N region, arid boundary; rainfed farming occurs extensively on the north side of the 75-day isoline in the Sudan, and sporadically elsewhere. On the Qoz Sands of Kordofan, rainfed cultivation extended beyond 14° until 198014° until (Olsson, 1985)). This line is proposed instead as a functional limit (Figure 6D). 2. E & S region, Kenya-Uganda borderlands: NE Uganda (Karamoja) received 650-850 mm of rainfall during the first half of the present century, characterised by extreme variability, supporting a vegetation of dry thorn scrub and a mixed pastoral-farming economy with cattle keeping both economically and culturally dominant. From Dyson-Hudson's (1966) account, it appears that the whole area (except possibly the mountains), up to the 210 day isoline, is best described as semi-arid. The boundary has been adjusted to include this area (sub-region 4, Figure 6F). On the Kenyan side of the border, almost all the territory with 75 or more growing days is rated as arid, with a very low stock carrying capacity, in Kenyan ecological classifications (Bekure et al., 1987). (Sub-region 4, Figure 6F).3. E & S region, S Somalia: rainfed agro-pastoralism extends well beyond the Bay region of southern Somalia to the central rangelands between 3° and 5°N (Holt, 1986). Rainfall, although low, is distributed through a long season. It is proposed to extend the functional boundary to include this area (Sub region 7, Figure 6E). 4. E & S region, W Kenya and SW Uganda: notwithstanding anomalously short growing periods (less than 120 days according to FAO), ecology and farming systems in the environs of Lake Victoria are subhumid in character (Mwendwa, 1985); in the Kenya portion only a small strip of territory receives less than 800 mm of rainfall annually. Both these areas, with the Lake Victoria coast of Tanzania (shown as A on Figure 6F) are excluded from our functional definition of the SAZ. 5. E & S region, Zambia: there are major differences between the LGP zones according to FAO and those estimated by an independent country study (Muchinda, 1985: see Appendix 6). These latter indicate shorter growing periods. Nevertheless, the ecology of most parts of Zambia is not semi-arid, and the farming systems (Schultz, 1976) have more in common with subhumid systems elsewhere. Altitude and latitude, through the temperature regime, must influence the effectiveness of Zambian rainfall, which appears to have a different relationship between annual total precipitation and length of growing period (more rainfall, shorter GPs) than is observed generally in the SAZ. For present purposes, Zambia is excluded from the SAZ, together with adjacent territory in Malawi (shown as A on Figure 6G).6. E & S region, Tanzania: certain areas in central Tanzania falling below the 75 day isoline are included in the SAZ on the grounds of their relatively small size and fragmented pattern (Subregion 8, Figure 6F). 7. E & S region, N & W Mozambique: the first of these zones (N Mozambique) carries a broadleafed woodland, is heavily infested with tsetse, only moderately populated and appears to have few livestock (Timberlake and Jordao, 1985: 5). The second is a small, sparsely inhabited area almost devoid of livestock. Although no farming system characterisations have been found, it is believed that they are neither truly semi-arid nor significant to the livestock economy of Mozambique, and they are therefore excluded (Shown as A on Figure 6G). 8. E & S region, E Botswana: the 75 day isoline understates the extent of rainfed farming in E Botswana significantly (while possibly overstating it in the north); excluded farming areas in Palapwe and Tutume should be included in the functional definition, which is extended westwards to 26°E (Sub-region 13, Figure 6H).These revisions made, the sub-regional classification is tabulated below and shown in Figure 6 (A-H). 2. Subregion numbers are shown in Figure 6 (A-H), where they are further sub-divided into environmental units (see below).3. In Tanzania there is a complex transitional pattern of bimodal and unimodal regimes.4. No clear peak in a long sometimes irregular. rainy season.The foregoing regional subdivisions leave much environmental diversity unaccounted for, being confined to agroclimatic variables. Soil-related variables need now to be conjoined with other relevant variables in order to delimit smaller units having a greater degree of homogeneity with regard to the primary resources of farming systems.In principle, a GIS-overlay computerised technique offers a method of unifying the variable distributions of different data sets. The nearest approaches to an operational GIS including environmental variables in sub-Saharan Africa are the FAO Land Inventory and UNEP's GEMS development. In the time available for the present study it has not been possible to explore the capability of the GEMS. The FAO Land Inventory has been used in Section 2 (above) to catalogue certain variables against LGP sub-zones. As mentioned above, the LGP sub-zones, when overlaid on thermal zones and countries, generate over 100 cells. If the soils map is superimposed on the map of LGP sub-zones, the number of cells is excessively large -1,213 for Kenya alone (FAO, 1984: 2). Something much simpler is needed for present purposes.The sources for this exercise are published maps. Those used were: The objective is to search the patterns of the mapped variables for convergent spatial distributions that provide a basis for environmental units.Land inventories have been developed, and published, for a number of national and sub-national areas including or impinging on the SAZ of sub-Saharan Africa. The resources available for such studies (e.g. those conducted by the LRD/LRDC/ODNRI/NRI of the UK Overseas Development Administration, the IEMVT in France, and the FAO/UNDP) permitted the processing of large quantities of primary dataair photography, soil samples, etc.and their incorporation into hierarchical procedures for taxonomy and aggregation of environmental units (cf. Bunting, 1987).These cannot be used for present purposes, because there is no way of bridging the gaps, or ensuring zonal compatibility.The present attempt at a preliminary approximation of environmental units for the SAZ relies, therefore, on a manual assessment of output from the sources listed above. There are many anomalies in the data which could not be solved given the time available. Also, the benchmark dates of the sources vary from the 1960s to (perhaps) the 1980s. A hazard that is intrinsic to any attempt to evaluate environmental trends is that such benchmarks may not be made clear in the sources, and in any case such data compilations have to make use of primary studies differing in date and reliability. The least reliable data probably affects the population, livestock and land use estimates. Desertification risk classes also cannot carry much weight, since only the briefest description is given of the method used to derive them (UNEP, 1977). There are anomalies apparent on several of the maps.The method used is as follows:(1) The 75 and 180 day LGP isolines are superimposed on country sections of the Soils Map of Africa at 1: 5M.(2) Generalised soil units are derived in three classes:1. one soil dominant >50% area (with or without associated soil >25% area)2. two soils dominant, total >66% area 3 no soils dominant (complex pattern).It should be noted that the map units shown on the Soils Map of Africa are associations of dominant, associated, and included soils, and that each of the 20 soil classes used is further subdivided into several soil units. In order to simplify, we used only the soil class (designated by a capital letter) and reduced the number of classes from 26 to 17 by omitting 9 classes considered to have minor importance in the SAZ. For example, Environmental Unit 35 in Sudan has associated soils described as follows:i.e., a dominant soil class, lithosols (I) with regosols (R) ->50% area occurs with an associated soil class, fluvisols (J) ->25% area.(3) If the 120-day isoline bisects the unit thus recognised, it is subdivided into two, identified as d (dry) or m (moist). If the isoline divides the unit very unequally, the lesser part is included under the dominant moisture regime.(4) Where data are available, a degradation risk value is assigned to the unit.(5) The dominant grassland community and descriptive category (e.g. savanna) are recorded, followed by the vegetation class number and a summary description of the woody vegetation.(6) The dominant desertification risk category is recorded.(7) An estimate of cattle density in each unit is obtained by choosing a representative 1 cm2 (10,000 km2 at 1: 10M) and counting the dot symbols.(8) The units are overlain on the population density map and the dominant range estimated, omitting urban and peri-urban agglomerations.(9) The presence of tsetse and species is recorded.(10) The environmental unit boundaries are revised when necessary at stages (4), (5), and (8) to better harmonize the variables.Environmental units having the same specification but separated in space or by national boundaries are combined under one identification number but retain alphabetical suffixes (the first letters of the country name) in order to facilitate matching with third order subdivisions and to make it possible to arrive at national evaluations.The fourth order regionalisation is used to generate (1) sectional maps of the SAZ at 1: 10M scale, showing the boundaries of the 83 environmental units, and (2) an environmental inventory for each unit in summary format. The maps follow, and the unit inventories are presented in Appendix 2.The advantage of presenting a regionalisation at four scales is that an appropriate order may be selected for the purpose in view and, if the lower orders are used, the hierarchical structure facilitates aggregating quantitative, or combining qualitative, values.It must be stressed, however, that this approximation rests on a data base of variable reliability. Although the rationale is stated as explicitly as possible, there is scope for differences in interpretation. The lower levels, especially the fourth order environmental units, of the schema need validation in the field and, where necessary, revision. It is suggested, however, that such revision should be directed towards reducing the number of fourth order units and not to increasing them. In Chapter 2, seven alternative typological principles were reviewed: functional farming systems, economic specialisation movement patterns, livestock ratios, traction characteristics, croplivestock interaction, and farming intensity. It was concluded that:1. no all purpose typology is likely to meet the requirements of ILCA's several research thrusts; 2. many typological principles have the fatal flaw that supporting data on the required variables are either not available on a compatible basis or are insufficiently reliable for comparative purposes; 3. that crop-livestock integration, and farming intensity, have the greatest theoretical and practical significance in relation to contemporary processes of change in semi-arid mixed farming systems; 4. that crop-livestock integration, however, must be measured in terms of a range of variables, sometimes giving contradictory signals, and the assignation of an 'integration score', averaged across these variables, may not therefore have much practical usefulness; 5. that farming intensity, which can be reduced (at some risk of oversimplification) to a single value for each system -the cultivated percentage -offers a taxonomic principle both readily measurable (from air photographs) and relevant to crucial issues of livestock management (grazing systems, feed resources, nutrient cycling in the farming system).An attempt has been made to review the available literature in French and English on mixed farming systems in the SAZ as defined for the purposes of this Study.Constraints Two constraints were imposed on this review.1. Literature has been sought on all countries having substantial SAZ, rather than accepting the uneven distribution of available studies; this systematic objective has been only partially met since time did not permit exhaustive searches to be made. Angola and Mozambique, in particular, have not been adequately covered in the search. 2. Studies have been included in the review only if they post-dated the droughts of the early 1970s, reflecting conditions during the last two decades when average rainfall has diminished by 30 per cent or more over a large part of the SAZ, compared with the means for 1931-60. This constraint implies that many of the 'classic' anthropological accounts of livestock-keeping societies give an unreliable guide to contemporary trends in management and in the environment (both natural and economic), an assumption that should not always pass without question, but which was applied throughout for the sake of consistency. The only exceptions were made for systems on which no recent characterisations could be found.The literature has several major limitations for the purpose of guiding research in the 1990s. Among these are the following:1. Uneven geographical distribution, as just mentioned. There are significant contrasts between (a) Portuguese and non-Portuguese speaking countries; (b) Anglophone and Francophone countries (in favour of the latter); (c) favourite and unpopular countries in each of these groups (for example, Chad and Tanzania have been relatively neglected; Senegal and Zimbabwe on the other hand enjoy numerous recent, rigorous studies); (d) favoured and neglected regions or societies within individual countries. 2. Variability in research objectives. A variety of research questions has been asked, reflecting the variety of professional disciplines involved. Consequently, the system characterisations have limited compatibility, and many questions were ignored if not seen to be relevant to the authors' stated objectives. This point is significant from ILCA's point of view since research objectives have been more rigorously defined since it came onto the scene, yet not much literature (outside ILCA's own substantial output) reflects these redefined objectives. 3. Mixed farming systems were neglected until recently, in favour of specialist livestock or crop producing systems. Where crop producing systems had a significant livestock component (most often small ruminants), it tended to be treated as marginal to the cropping enterprises, like farm forestry, which also plays a significant role in some farming systems. Explicit attention to, and attempts to quantify, the linkages between crops, livestock and trees has not been characteristic of the bulk of the literature on African farming systems.The review was exploratory in nature and designed to discover whether a basis exists within the literature on SAZ mixed farming systems for a typology. Two options were available: (a) to concentrate on a small number of systems (say 10) and review the literature on those systems in depth; or (b) to search widely for compatible characterisations if at a more superficial level, of (say) 50 systems. The second option was preferred because of the known diversity of the SAZ and its farming systems, and the lack of a principle on which the selection of a small number (option a) could be based.The review comprised the following stages:1. Bibliographical search. A total of 500 references to potential case studies were listed from available sources in English and French and where possible scanned or abstracted. These include published items (books, journals), consultancy reports, theses, government documents and those of international organizations. It is probable that the items listed represent a fraction, perhaps a half or two thirds, of the materials in existence in a diversity of locations. Only about 30 percent of the listed items have been seen, however, and since their titles are rarely a reliable guide to the presence or absence of usable system characterisations, it is not possible to estimate the value of the unreviewed literature for the purpose of the present study. 2. Case study review. 65 items were reviewed, representing 30 per cent of the listed references.Of these 11 were subsequently rejected either because the systems described fall outside the SAZ as redefined (see Chapter 3) or because they contained insufficient information. A further 12 were merged with other studies of the same systems or areas, and one was split. The resulting 43 case studies were reviewed under 32 standard typological variables. The list of case studies is given below. 3. Reformatting. During the course of the review it became apparent that some of the variables could be discarded without loss, and others condensed, for the typological objective in view.Accordingly the 43 case studies were reformatted on 32 variables, which include scores on 8 variables of crop-livestock integration (nos. 17-24), and a score for farming intensity (no. 29).The list of variables is as follows: The output, in the form of standardised summaries of the case studies, is presented in Appendix 1.The incompleteness of many of the entries will be apparent. This reflects the inadequacies of the sources (for this purpose). Many of these gaps could be filled from further searches in the literature. The present operation was severely constrained by the time available, and its purpose is illustrative rather than definitive. Enough has been done to show the potential and the limitations of this type of approach to classifying the literature.2. It provides a method of identifying the gaps both in geographical coverage and in knowledge.3. It offers a basis for an ongoing inventory of mixed farming systems, using ILCA's in-house resources and a sharpened or modified variable 'menu'. Such an inventory may have value to other agencies interested in livestock research and in dry land management. 4. On the other hand, such an approach can be no better than the literature on which it is based. 5. It cannot provide an input to specific research programmes or substitute for specialised literature searches. Its purpose is restricted to the typological or taxonomic objective.The present Study is undertaken at a time when reservations about the conventional view of degradation in the SAZ are becoming commonplace, and both its linkages with management, and the evidence for its progression are being questioned (see, for example, Ahlcrona, 1988: Mortimore, 1989, a,b;Nelson, 1988;Olsson, 1985;Sandford, 1983). It is difficult to reconcile this perspective with the orthodox view of desertification as a man-made and irreversible process consuming large areas of productive land every year (UNEP, 1977: Tolba, 1986). In mixed farming areas, both the degradation of arable land under cycles of cultivation, and the degradation of rangeland under various levels of stocking, are issues. Relevant to both cropping and animal husbandry, as well as to the status of the environment in general, is the management of the woody vegetation.Environmental status has traditionally been left to ecologists to define, even though it has long been recognised that low nutrient status in cultivated soils is primarily an aspect of their economic management, and may be remediable given the right incentives. Work on common access grazings in the Communal Areas of Zimbabwe has challenged conventional notions of carrying capacity and overstocking (Thiesen and Marastha, 1974;Sandford, 1982;Cousins et al, 1989;Scoones, 1989). Optimum stocking levels for commercial beef cattle may be lower than those of dairy herds whose functions include household subsistence, investment, breeding, manure and traction, and which are fed partly on residues and browse. What may appear as overstocking to the ecologist may be economically efficient to the stockowner. Alteration of the vegetation is not irreversible. The opportunity costs of alternative forms of management are more relevant to an understanding than a comparison between observed and potential vegetation; also, annual primary productivity may be higher under intensive grazing. It appears necessary to distinguish between ecological degradation (in the sense of the loss of primary potential productivity) and a functional, remediable degradation that reflects the economic rationale of a particular management system under certain constraints of capital, land or labour.Reliance on diagnostic evidence (e.g., a substitution of annual grasses for perennials, of unpalatables for palatables, the appearance of bare ground, gully erosion, etc.) supported by intuitively convincing hypotheses linking management (or mismanagement) with degradation, has tended to obscure the scarcity of longitudinal data that would allow the rate and nature of degradation to be established. Proper examination of such data, increasingly available from the interpretation of air photos and earth satellite imagery, exposes many ambiguities and tends to emphasise the impact of rainfall fluctuations. Meanwhile the efficiency of some pastoral nomadic systems, in terms of energy conversion under conditions of fluctuating climatic stress, is becoming better understood (Western, 1982;Coughenour et al, 1985). Such studies would be appropriate in the SAZ also.If the condition of the vegetation is not always a reliable guide to the quality of management, neither can stocking rates be used as a short cut to assessing degradational status. Overstocking (however defined) may occur at any point on the scale of farming intensity. If it truly occurs, then unless the livestock are fed from imported feed, there must be either cumulative ecological degradation, losses from sale or starvation, or both. It is a transitional, not a permanent condition.The persistence of livestock populations that are supposed to be much higher than local carrying capacities for decades, if not generations, is therefore of obvious significance.Carrying capacity estimates tend to be related to the area of available land rather than to the total capacity of the managed ecosystem to feed livestock (natural grazing, browse, crop residues, weeds, fodder crops, field boundary plants, irrigation canal-sides, etc). Arable encroachment on grazing land has major implications for cattle management, even though the crop residues may support more LUs/ha on an annual basis than the natural grazings. A switch into small ruminants, however, may sidestep such problems, and there are mixed farming systems where comparatively high small ruminant stocking levels are maintained, although natural grazings have all but disappeared.The following model is advanced linking human and animal population densities, farming intensity, crop-livestock integration and environmental management.The first stage of the model is a low population density associated with farming enclaves and a predominance of grazing land. With increasing human population density, which is expressed in increasing availability of family labour, and given the economic conditions (uncertain market supply/prices of foodstuffs) that encourage a subsistence priority in the household economy, arable land expands at the expense of natural grazings. As the human population rises, and given the multipurpose value of livestock, so does the livestock population, subject to constraints imposed by household poverty, disease or starvation in drought. Diminishing natural grazings may favour small ruminants at the expense of cattle, or necessitate transhumance. The loss of natural woodland encourages the protection and eventually planting of browse (especially valuable for small ruminants) and other trees on farmland. Increasing frequency of cultivation (increasing labour inputs/ha) necessitates the use of animal manure and enhances this function of livestock, as well as favouring grain/legume crop mixtures. Crop residues increase in importance relative to natural grazings as sources of fodder. Leguminous trees, providing dry season browse as well as benefiting crop growth, increase in importance in the system. Trees and planted field boundaries (also sources of fodder) stabilise soil wash and reduce aeolian activity. The rising scarcity of land intensifies individual claims to access rights, and eventually raises the market price of land and the frequency of sale relative to other forms of transfer. Labour and capital investments are made in order to raise the productivity of land. Labour diversification out of agriculture, in response to alternative income-earning opportunities, need not cause the system to decline owing to the investment value of both the land and the livestock. Primary productivity of the system is low (constrained by the manure supply) but stable, and degradation is held in check.This model provides a rationale for linking sustainable environmental management with high human and livestock densities, in contrast with much conventional wisdom that sees-rising tendencies as a certain road to environmental degradation. According to such a model, degradation is more likely to occur earlier in the sequence, if an increasing human population density is not associated with the introduction of intensive practices and crop-livestock integration.The implication is that the link between the characteristics of mixed farming systems and environmental degradation, or sustainability, should be sought in the management of intensification, achieved through the integration of crops, livestock and (probably) trees.Chapter 2 reviewed seven available principles on which a typology of mixed farming systems in the SAZ may be based, and concluded that the most useful general principles (though not necessarily for all users) are the linked ones of crop-livestock integration and farming intensity.Chapter 3 developed a regionalisation of the SAZ of sub-Saharan Africa in four orders of increasing scale. The first order subdivision is between W & N and E & S geographical regions.The second order subdivision follows LGP Zones by country, using data from the FAO's Land Inventory and Population Supporting Capacities project. The third order is according to agroclimate, employing moisture, modality, and monthly regimes. This subdivision exposes anomalies in the SAZ as defined by the LGP isolines of 75 and 180 growing days, and a functional redefinition is proposed. The fourth order subdivision develops a set of 83 Environmental Units based on a synthesis of mapped data from 8 available published sources (see Appendix 2).Chapter 4 reviews the characteristics of mixed farming systems through a sample of published and unpublished literature, whose limitations for this purpose are noted. From 65 system characterisations reviewed, 43 case studies are systematically analysed on 32 variables (see Appendix 1), including scores for 8 integration variables, and for farming intensity as indicated by the cultivated percentage. The review provides a basis for a classification of systems, but the literature provides a very weak basis for estimating the territorial extent, livestock and human populations of the systems (Term of Reference 6: see Appendix 6).It has not proved possible to identify direct and unambiguous linkages between system characteristics and trends in environmental degradation, or in other words, to link ecological sustainability to properties of system management on the basis of measured observations.1. The distribution of case studies (reviewed in Chapter 4) on the map of Environmental Units (Figure 6) leaves many EUs unrepresented by a system characterisation. A larger sample is needed. However the literature is unevenly distributed and many EUs will remain unrepresented even if a more thorough search is undertaken. 2. There is little reason to suppose that a system case study is always reliably representative of the EU in which it is situated. There is also little reason to expect that there is any general correspondence between system properties and EUs, since some of the criteria used for delimiting the EUs may have marginal significance for system management. 3. No clear pattern of degradation risk or status emerges from the mapping of the EUs. This is partly because the sources are inadequate -the assessments of degradation risk are only available for areas north of Lat. 2°N, and elsewhere the broad categories of desertification risk provide an insufficiently detailed guide. More fundamentally, it is because actual degradation is linked to management as well as to environmental characteristics. 4. Characterisations of mixed farming systems often ignore questions of sustainability, or deal with them in a superficial way. This arises from the differences in the professional skills required for the investigation of socio-economic, technical, and environmental variables, and from the relatively late arrival of sustainability on the research agenda of management-related studies. 5. Unlike the EUs, the mixed farming systems identified in the present study do not comprise a spatially complete set, which, if it were available, would invite correlation with the map of EUs. Not only are many systems unrepresented in the literature, but of those that have been described, the territorial limits are rarely known.Because it has not proved possible to link in a systematic way the organizational (management) aspects of systems directly to reliable indicators of environmental status, as set out in Term of Reference 4 (see Appendix 6), it has been necessary to proceed independently with the generation of Environmental Units and with the taxonomy of mixed farming systems.However, in setting out a rationale for both of these operations, the present study provides a basis for further work.1. A refinement of the EUs as defined and classified. Further subdivision is not considered useful since it would increase the number of units in the SAZ as a whole, and in some individual countries, to a level that would be complex. On the other hand, amalgamating the EUs into a smaller number would increase the internal variability of the units, and it is preferable, if a smaller number is required, to use divisions based on a smaller number of criteria, i.e. the third order (LOP) subdivisions or the second order (agroclimatic) subdivisions. 2. Further analysis of the FAO Land Inventory data with a view to (a) revising the system of 83 EUs derived from conventional published maps, and extending the scope of the accompanying inventory, and (b) linking the LGP sub-zones with livestock-related variables such as biomass production in natural pastures, and the availability of crop residues as fodder. 3. Exploration of the GEMS system's capability for supplementing the FAO's LGP zonation and the system of EUs employed here. It may prove possible in future to substitute a computerised GISbased regionalisation.4. An extension of the systems review to a larger number of cases, an intensification of selected cases from additional literature, and the filling of some gaps in the map of mixed farming systems. Given a larger and more complete set of case studies, systematic analysis of the patterns of similarity may be attempted. 5. Cross tabulation of selected system characteristics in order to explore in a preliminary way the existence of linkages between, say:stocking rates (LUs/km 2 ) and integration scores cultivated percentages and human/livestock densities access rights and market impact livestock types and economic integration system integration and environmental sustainability or degradation investment value and effects of drought (see the key to Appendix 1)This has not been attempted in the present study. It would be desirable to strengthen the review of the systems before doing so.6. Incorporation of livestock census data at the national level into the systems typology (and EUs), where available. The National Livestock Census of Nigeria, presently in progress, offers an opportunity.The difficulty we have experienced in identifying clear patterns linking the systems typology with the environmental variables, notwithstanding the priority of the degradation-sustainability issue in the SAZ, underlines the need for both (a) more system characterisations and (b) a format to expose such linkages on a compatible basis. Ayele, 1982;Yenegnuhal 1981;Getahun, 1978;JEPSS, 1983 Ethiopia, Wollo Province, Ambasel, Woreda/Sirinka Valley, NE escarpment <450 ->800 mm (SAZ, B,M/D) Oromo, Afar (lowlands). Amhara (highlands). Description applies to Oromo. Altitudinal profile fundamental; Highlands (>1800 mm) dega, Amhara farmers.Valley/bench (1500-1800m) woina dega, Borkenna, Amhara farmers.Lowlands (<1400m) kola Oromo mixed farmers. Rangelands, Afar nomads: Rainfall diminishes with altitude.Rugged terrain on slopes, swamps in valley, alluvial soils in lowlands 30(S) -60 (N)/km 2 (1978 est) 17-20/km (cattle) (1978 est) Cattle 4.2/hh, sheep 0.3/hh, goats 0.8/hh, poultry; Yenegnuhal gives 2.5 cattle, 3.2 sheep, 2.5 goats, 2.2 chickens, 1.5 donkeys/horse/mule per farmer for Ambasel Woreda (68% > 1400m) Open access rangeland in the Afar-Oromo buffer zone; armed clashes Private ownership of farmland in the Central Valley & Oromo lowlands Milk (cows, goats) eggs Sale/renting of transport animals; sale of animals to buy grain; fattening of Afar animals for sale After drought, reinvestment in livestock Herding contracts with Afar in Afar rangelands, March (if small rains fall) or July till October. Residue grazing contracts with Afar friends, Oromo lowlands; Dec -Jan. Middleman contracts to graze central valley farmers cattle in Afar -Oromo buffer zone or subcontract them to Afar herders, July-Aug. Contracts to graze their small stock (with women and children) on Borkenna residues, dry seasons. Renting plough oxen from Afars for share cropping or grain payments (banned by Government). Selling labour to Afar irrigated cotton farmers. Share cropping with migrant farmers from central valley, who provide seed, oxen, labour. All Contracts may involve cash payments 2 or 3 2 2 2 3 (1.4 oxen and 0.8 plough/farmer) 1 (cattle only on farm for 2 months for residues) 1 25 -Scarce: conflict over rangeland; contracts to equalise land and labour in altitudinal zones. Arable expansion in central valley reduces grazing; needed as retreat in dry years Migrant labour (male) and service (women), Assob, sale of ropes, wood, weaving; livestock trading. Fattening cattle for sale Integration by exchange contracts, which depends on market. Hamar specialise in goats Open access grazing but certain areas claimed jointly or exclusively by segments Territorial segments tend to be observed Milk, blood; meat at festivals; hides for various purposes Cattle ownership highly valued 1? 0? 0 (slash/burn, flood plain siltation alternatives); 1 (tobacco planted on corral sites) 0 2? 1 or 2? Abundant Gamu Gofa groups do not depend on livestock or crops exclusively. Also fishing Cattle traded for guns, goats or honey for cloth, coffee, grain. Volume of import-export trade may not reach value of 1 cow/6 goats/hh/2yrs. 1 Flood recession cultivation in Omo delta, L Rudolph, and irrigation along river. Tsetse spreading S. Soil depletion in medium altitude locations Fluctuations in levels of rivers and L. Rudolph 37 Ayele, 1975 Ethiopia, Arsi Province, Bale sub -highlands 600 mm (SAZ, B, M) Altitude 1,600 -1000m. Rainfall falls with altitude. Genale R perennial water, scarce in S. n.a. n.a.Small sample averaged 30 cattle, 5 goats, 2 horses, 5-6 camels/owner interviewed Cattle ownership varies from 100 to 3/owner rich to poor. Marriage gifts and inheritance influence holdings, also management (disease control) Milk (cows, camels, goats) Cattle and goat sales out of necessity, bridewealth; income of small sample: honey 71% livestock 41% cereals 13%; fattening oxen, bulls for market Split families; livestock to highlands dry, to lowlands wet. Renting oxen from livestock specialists 2 1 or 2 0 (following) (used for plastering houses) 2 or 3 2? 1 1 Land sales (banned 1974) Diminishing grazing land? Fattening bulls, oxen 83% hh heads visit market once or twice weekly. Export of livestock products, honey in exchange for food, consumer goods. 1 or 2 39 Cossins and Bekele, 1974 Ethiopia, Tigray Province, Waq and Tembien 7-800 mm (SAZ, B,M) Tigreans Waq -a dissected plateau. Tembien -a deep basin. Rugged terrain, heavy erosion, flash floods. Terrace management of steep slopes. n.a. n.a. Tembien (higher) 4-7 cattle, 37-70 sheep/goats/middle income owner; Waq (lower) up to 15 cattle, up to 200 sheep/goats Wealth: richest 10% own x 4 average and poorest 40% as few as zero. Sheep ownership higher on highlands. Few women owners Browse lopping open access, daily grazing 6-8 km (wet) several days away (dry) common or open access Individual ownership, heritable, saleable; renting 1-3 years common milk, butter Sales of livestock essential in drought; wool blankets sold Contingency investment essential Shepherd boys paid in animals, cash or milking. Fallows leased to cattle owners for manure; crop divided 2 (stubble cannot be privatised) 0 or 1? 2 2 2 1 1 or 2 1 or 2? Arable expansion necessitates longer grazing circuits Fattening sheep and goats for sale Labour migration Livestock products, honey sold for food, consumer goods. 45% Tembien farmers visit market weekly 2 or 3 Lopping and felling of browse trees in dry years. Massive gully erosion. Terraces, restraining walls on gullies Loss of livestock; diminished market activity; zero yields on up to 86% fields, permanent labour migration. 41 Kjaerby, 1980 Tanzania, Hanang District (SAZ, B/U, M) Barbaig Impact of villagization on grazing system 54,590 in 8,309 homesteads, expected to double in 20-25 years 300,000 cattle, 100,000 small stock (author's estimates) Cattle, small stock @ 36 cattle/hh of 6.6 people and 12 small stock (calculated from author's figures) Common access grazing, not secure from registered allocations to farms Government allocations Meat (slaughters on special occasions; dying animals or diseased also) Milk Low offtake (2% cattle) but sold for food, to finance implements, inputs or labour. Income of cattle keeping families is x 2 that of non cattle owning families. Bridewealth. Cattle keeping the most reliable hedge against shortfalls in crop production 'No form of integration between crop and cattle production' instead, labour competition Villagization causing reverse dispersal of population (below) Arable expansion driving grazing out of high altitude dry-season pastures and away from villages; incoming cultivators and capitalist farmers in villages Govt. policy to increase cattle offtake is resisted because (a) investment value of cattle (b) scarce commodity supply hence demand for cash (c) dietary preference (milk). 1957-75 T of T moved against cattle (15-2 bags maize) 1 or 2 Move into maize cultivation (see 28) Herd mortality higher near villages than in frontier areas due to overstocking; environmental consequences of un-integrated system 43 Cossins et al, 1984 Ethiopia, Harerghe Province, Jijiga area 700 mm (SAZ, B. M) Somali Flat topped limestone hills, calcareous soils. Pediments, calcareous soils, erodible. Vertisols. Rainfall gradient from NW to SE 50 animals/km 2 (1971) Cattle, sheep, goats, camels; in 1971 farmers herds in 3 clans included 30-75 sheep, 8-21 goats, 13-17 cattle and 1-3 camels Differences between clans and between farmers (fewer camels, more cattle) and pastoralists Common access grazing Registered allocations to capitalist farmers until 1974 Milk, meat Livestock are more important to their owners than farming Highlands West 2 Highland East 2 Jijiga Plains 1 or 2 2?2? 1 or 2?1? 1 or 2 1 or 2 1 or 2 1 or 2 1 2 1 2 Incoming farmers Grazing land transferred to arable especially in valley bottoms Livestock sales to Somali Republic Highlands W 2 or 3 E 2 Jigiga Plains1 Tractor ploughing even though large-scale farming abolished in 1975 Rangeland degradation is due to the timing of grazing rather than the numbers of animals; overpopulated x 2 or x 3 (Pratt); annuals replacing other grasses, palatables being eaten out; cultivation of unsuitable dry areas. 44 Timberlake and Jordao, 1985 Mozambique, Maputo, Gaza, Inhambane 5-800 mm (SAZ, ST, M(D)) n.a. n.a. n.a. 6 cattle/km 2 family sector decreasing at 1% pa, 1977-83 Range from 2 to 16 cattle/family In southern 3 provinces, 7, 16, and 27% families own cattle Communal areas -common access grazing for sedentary or semi-nomadic Milk, meat Offtake about 4% cattle, only sold in special circumstances. SR sold to meet current expenses Implied strongly 1 or 2 2? 2 uncommonly 1 1 1 or 2 2?Abundance of grazing (and by implication arable) land since S provinces are 50% understocked, but see 31 Low offtake 1? Overgrazing reported near water in communal areas. Soil erosion advanced in 20% area 46 ARDA 1982-84 Zimbabwe, S Matabele land 3-600 mm (SAZ, U/ST, D) Ecological Region IV/V Matabele Granite and gneiss variable sands, loamy sands. Basalt clay complex soils, fertile.' Gold belt' complex, heavy, relatively fertile. Deciduous tree savanna. Rainfall unreliable. 25/km 2 LU 8-38/km 2 (2-11 ha/LU) Goats 3-8/hh, donkeys 4-6,-chickens 8-14, cattle 6-13, sheep 0-7, some pigs Goats, donkeys more numerous in Zone V; chickens, cattle in Zone IV. Zone IV hh own more assets Communal grazing areas, no exclusive rights Family and individual lands held by virtue of community membership, exclusive rights Milk, meat Offtake 6-10%; income used for (1) food purchases, (2) school fees: (3) other needs Implied 1 or 2 1 or 2 2 or 3 (depending on crop and zone -in Zone IV use is 70-90% plots (highest maize); in Zone V 5-25% ('burns' crops) 2 or 3 (oxen dominant in Zone IV, donkeys Zone V) 2 or 3 2 2 Commercial land occupies over 50% total 1.2-1.7 males/hh and 1.2-2.2 females/hh away from home, remitting. Cash income/hh and value of food production/hh both higher in Zone IV 2? Attempts to introduce soil conservation measures and to intensify management of arable on a smaller area have had little success. Overstocking claims disputed by Sandford (1982) on absence of evidence of degradation 60% hh reported livestock losses by death; average reduction in all stock 50% in 12 months Steinfeld, 1988, Thiesen andMarasha, 1974 Zimbabwe, Chilimanzi, SE of Geweru 700 mm (SAZ, U,M) Ecological zone III Shona Ferallitic sandy soils; depressions (vleis) 50/km 2 LU 8/km 2 6.4 cattle/hh, 2.5 goats, 0.2 sheep, 0.4 donkeys, some pigs Hh owning vlei land have larger herds. Men own most stock, women may own small stock Communal grazing areas, no exclusive rights Family and individual lands held by virtue of community membership, exclusive rights Milk, meat (small stock). Food less important than crop inputs Livestock products least important source of income. Goats sold for cash Needs for livestock primarily draft, transport and subsistence but social security and sale value are significant, former for 'spiritual integrity' 2 (progressive farmers), 20-25% total feed ? but see 46,63 1 2 (incl. anthills) -more LUs = more manuring = larger yields (total). 5-9 t/ha 2 (75% owning -3% use donkeys, 91% oxen) 2 2 2 Continuous arable encroachment on grazing Off-farm income 32%, remittances 13%, of crop sales 49%, livestock products 6% of cash income. Vlei cultivators have more LUs more and better literacy, child nutrition, and lower mortality. 40% male (adults) absent. 50% family heads work for urban wages. 3-9% cattle offtake, 11% goats. 76% families who sell livestock have > 6LUs, the viability threshold 2 Severe erosion in grazing areas, sheet erosion and gullying; vlei cultivation; abandonment of conservation; 'overstocking' 48 Steinfeld, 1988 Zimbabwe: Mberengwa, NE of Beitbridge 520 mm (SAZ, U/ST, D) Ecological zone V Ndebele Ferallitic sandy soils; depressions (vleis) n.a. LU 20/km 2 4.9 cattle/hh, 10.3 goats, 1.9 donkeys, 0.1 sheep (see 46, 47, 63) Importance of goats and donkeys reflects aridity. More non-owners than 47 Communal grazing areas, no exclusive rights Family and individual lands held by virtue of community membership, exclusive rights Milk, meat (goats esp) More important than crop input functions Livestock products least important. Goats sold for cash needs Cattle -accumulated wealth, security 2 (2,000 kg DM/hh) <10% total feed 2 (4.7 t/ha) 2 (56% owning) (21% using donkeys, 75% oxen) 2 2 2 Less crop/livestock integration than 47 Continuous arable encroachment on grazing Off farm income 45% remittances 21% cf crop sales 29% and livestock prod. 4% of cash income Offtake -7.6% (cattle), 15.3% (goats) i.e. buying in cattle, post drought 1 or 2 'Overstocking' but feed resources adequate summer and 60% winter 65% cattle losses in three years 49 Little, 1983 Kenya, Baringo District, Njemps 6-800 mm (SAZ, B,M) Il Chamus High rainfall variability range 8 -66/km 2 n.a. Wealthy Il Chamus prefer irrigation (10% own 40% land); the poor do dryland farming Common access grazings Irrigable plots allocated by elders or council. Borrowing, purchase, Dryland plots used one year at a time, not heritable Cash from livestock sales is most important source of income Implied 2 or 3? (some tractors) 1 or 2 1 or 2 1 or 2 Labour bottlenecks Feb-Mar (dryland) July-Aug (irrig) Permanent settlements for irrigation Irrigable land scarce. Irrigation on fringes of swamps reduces dry season grazing Irrigation development may have reached its limits and may jeopardise pastoralism in the long term T o T of livestock have declined in 25 years, encouraging cultivation (cf. Barbaig) 1 Increased irrigation and dryland farming 50 Rukandema et al, 1983 Kenya, Southern Kitui District (2 locations) 530,800 mm (SAZ, B. D/M) Akamba Slopes 2-160 with steep slopes to 50o. Seasonal streams, acacia bush n.a. n.a. Cattle, 11-12/farmer (?), sheep 7-11, goats 4-10, donkeys, chickens SR holdings smaller in drier location. Fewer own cattle, goats, sheep in drier location Common access grazings Registered title Milk (76=80%) farmers), meat Cash income 72-83% (higher in wetter location) Livestock valued for 'tradition' and 'breeding' 1 or (20%) 2 2 by 25% (wetter) and 13% (drier) locations 1 or 2 1 1 2? Off farm income more important than crops which are more important than livestock 2? 66-70% farmers cite erosion as most important factor restricting soil productivity, 47-53% cite infertility. 23-31% farms wholly or partly terraced 51 Rukandema et al, 1981 Kenya, S Machakos District 777 mm (SAZ, B,M) Akamba Gently undulating. Sandy soils, vertisol patches, seasonal streams, acacia bush 100 LU/km 2 Cattle 7/owner, 10 goats and 3-4 sheep/farm 80% farmers own cattle, 82% goats, 49% sheep Common access grazing Registered title(?) including fallow Milk (73% cattle, 55% goat, 37% sheep owners) 78% keep goats for sale, 44% sheep, 88% cattle Implied 2 or 3 (92% feed) 2 or (8%) 3 2? (68% use) 3 (78% own ploughs) 1 2 or 3 (80% keep on farm -incl. fallows and stallfeeding, 10% -all year) 2 or 3 1 (26% farm land under cultivation) Erosion cited as principal factor limiting productivity by 61% farmers, infertility by 41%. 'Extremely overstocked' Crop failure, increased dry planting 53 Campbell, 1978;1979;Bekure et al, 1987;Holland, 1987 Kenya, Kajiado Where only one letter is shown, this soil is dominant over 50% or more of the area. Where two letters, separated by a dot, are shown, the two soils are dominant over 66% or more and letters following + are subsidiary soils covering over 25% of the area. (J) (G) or (l) mean that these important soils are present but cover less than 25% of the area. A similar notation is used for other variables. The number of the mapping unit is given, followed by a description using the following abbreviation: There is now an increasing awareness of the risks to environmental degradation in the semi-arid zone. This justifies a wholistic approach to mixed farming systems and their degrading or sustaining impact on the environment. b. Recent drought experience in Africa has re-emphasized the complementary economic roles of livestock and crops in contributing to household viability, especially during crop failures, when livestock ownership supports smallholder resilience by diversifying economic options. c. The search for appropriate technologies of intensification to improve productivity in the semiarid zone has generated interest in indigenous systems of smallholder farming with livestock and trees as integral components, as well as new technologies of agro-forestry-with-livestock. The cost of inorganic fertilizers in semi-arid environments means that alternatives, including nutrient cycling through livestock, have to be taken seriously.However, the diversity of mixed farming systems is considerable, and insufficient is known of the nature and scale of contemporary change and stress. There is need for a review and taxonomy of mixed farming systems with respect to the role of the livestock component and its environmental impact (increased vulnerability to degradation or enhanced sustainability).The geographical scope of the study will be the semi-arid zones of all countries in sub-Saharan Africa between the Tropics including Mauritania, Sudan, Botswana, Mozambique, Madagascar and Namibia, but excluding countries touching the Mediterranean, and the Republic of South Africa.The study will review accessible published and \"grey\" literature on mixed farming systems in the semi-arid zone using ethnicity as an initial frame of reference; and inventory, to the extent possible with the accessible literature, for each system: The systems will be summarised by country with respect to (g). As far as is found practicable, the ethnically labelled systems will be subdivided or combined on the basis of major differences or similarities in the properties (a)-(f) above, and a set of functionally homogeneous systems identified.The study will review information relating to environmental trends, risks, and stresses, including where available evidence of: A theoretical evaluation of potential environmental risk will be attempted by relating key management properties of mixed farming systems to published maps of erosion and desertification hazard, estimates of human carrying capacity, and data on rainfall trends since about 1965.The study will classify mixed farming systems according to the most appropriate criteria selected from section 4 above, and (if practicable) on an environmental vulnerability sustainability scale. The human and livestock populations and territorial extent of each class will be estimated."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1966107573.json b/main/part_2/1966107573.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f3abee3763d82806dd3b95808d4ddf1f8e02857d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1966107573.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"eada8a750afe2b68a603f8658ec47834","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H038674.pdf","id":"-579201130"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c0501af5-1355-435e-b24b-91933910f0c5","content":"The rural poverty is becoming acute to chronic in Central Asian region since the collapse of the Former Soviet Union. The rural population is most affected by the social, economic, and institutional shocks of the post independence reforms in Central Asia to the extent that today, about 85% of the farm households live below an average of US$ 1/head per day. Over 70% of population in the region lives in rural areas. The major policy change in agriculture for the last decade was privatization of the agricultural land. The introduction of private farming after 70-year long socialist collective farming resulted in the emergence of hundreds of thousands of new inexperienced farmers. A thousand-fold increase in the number of farmers in the post-Soviet rural landscape poses a challenge to water distribution amongst tens to hundreds of small-scale farmers sharing one tertiary canal. The old water distribution approaches, mostly oriented to serve the largeness of former collective farms, have become obsolete. The Soviet era water distribution approach had been based on preparing seasonal water demand plans, using standardized crop water requirements for different agro-ecological zones, which were subject to proportionate adjustments in case forecasts for water availability were low. Former collective farms were first required to submit its water demand, then revise it after each 10 days, and finally receive the volume requested with proportionate adjustments if any for the season. Such huge farms were usually specialized in mono-crop cultivation, having several hydro-technicians and water masters on their staff to distribute water amongst their fields following technical standards and recommendations, the approach, which worked quite well. However, the post-independence land reforms have resulted in massive land fragmentation and the emergence of multiple small farm units within the boundaries of former collective farms, leading to chronic inequities in water distribution (Ul-Hassan, et. al, 2004). Seasonal water use plans continued to be made only for secondary and tertiary distributary canals ignoring everything below these levels, where farmers actually would abstract their water. Besides, it had suddenly become impossible to collect precise cropping plans data from now numerous farmers along one canal. Thus, the water use plans so prepared would normally fail to reflect the real on-farm water needs. Throughout the cropping season, each user would submit a verbal request 3 days prior to irrigation to canal water master. The water master would collect and register all such requests and then start releasing water. Since no measuring devices are normally available in the head of distributary off-takes, no records would be maintained to account for water actually released and distributed. Given large numbers of overlapping water requests from the farmers, the water master faces great difficulty to set up a workable schedule of water releases. As a result, almost all the outlets would be left open to let the water continuously flow into the fields. Consequently, the smaller fields would be filled up quickly with the surplus water discharged to the drainage network, while the bigger plots would never be irrigated in full throughout the entire season. It is also not unheard of in this situation that if a farmer is not personally present in his/her field while irrigating it, there will be always somebody to steal his/her water. So, given the whole new situation, the previously functional water management practices have turned up unsuitable or even redundant resulting in much of a chaos, inequities and unreliability in the present water delivery at the tertiary level and thus complicating poverty situation especially among those who are hydraulically more tail-end located along irrigation canals. Both the water users and the water masters were equally frustrated with such a situation, expressing a strong demand for more transparent and equitable water distribution methods that would suit their interests and require no additional investments in the infrastructure. This was the reason for the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) to develop and pilot-test in 2003 and 2004 a simple time-based water distribution method in one of the typical tertiary canals in Kyrgyzstan as a part of its work within the IWRM-Ferghana Project 1 . Thus, the paper provides brief description of the site, the water distribution approach and the impacts on crop yields, farm incomes and resultant fee collection.The newly emerged independent states in Central Asia have been facing drastic increases in the poverty levels since the collapse of the Soviet Union.. Disrupted economic ties and post-independence reforms that followed in the region have inflicted much of a shock, both social and economic, on local populations especially those living in the rural areas. With most population in the newly independent Central Asian states being predominantly rural (70%) the only thing that the rural people could still rely on in their livelihoods was farming whatever irrigated land they had either in their personal family disposal -normally as tiny kitchen gardens in the backyard of their houses -or as additional land received on an ownership or long-term tenancy basis following massive land privatization or land redistribution of former huge-size collective farms. Since crop cultivation in Central Asia is hugely water-dependent, access to and availability of irrigation water was one of the crucial factors for rural people to survive and cope with new realities of transitional economy. Given continuous fragmentation of agricultural lands the entire former water management paradigm which was previously meant to serve the construct and needs of huge-size collective farming has become victim to the newly emerging context. This was further complicated by the new geopolitical order in the region including competing multiple national and sub-national interestsThe emergence of private farmership in Central Asia following 70 years of collective farming has brought both positive and negative changes. While increases in land and water productivity and use of innovative approaches and resources conservation practices were among the positive ones, those on the negative side included exclusion of huge numbers of former collective farm workers from the access to limited land and water resources thus resulting in increasing rural poverty, social tensions and stratification of the rural society. This has also resulted in creating much of a problem and disruption in water distribution among multiple water users, especially, on the tertiary level.Previously, in the former Soviet Union (FSU), water distribution in agriculture used to be based on water use plans, that applied a statutory crop water requirements principle Commission for Water Coordination. The project aims at reorganizing water management organizations along the hydrological boundaries of main and secondary canals instead of the administrative boundaries of farms, districts and provinces, promotes stakeholder participation in the management, and identifies options for improving water and land productivity.when planning and implementing water distribution Water supply requirements for each specific crop once tested and verified through pilot trials were then formally standardized and served as mandatory norms when planning irrigation for each such crop. This approach was well justified under the then collective farm system when most farms were huge in size and specialized in mono-crop cultivation. Given the new context of agricultural reforms resulting in massive land fragmentation and the formation of multiple medium to smallholder farms, equitable water distribution today using the same approach is hardly possible. Water use plans so prepared are normally meant only for distributary (secondary and tertiary) canals in a given irrigation system leaving everything below this level at large. Thus water among the watercourse off-takes is distributed against water users' requests. Each user would submit a verbal request 3 days prior to irrigation to the Mirab (water master, in local Turkick languages). Since no measuring devices are normally available in the head of distributary off-takes, no records would be maintained to account for water actually released and distributed.Given large numbers of overlapping water requests from the farmers, the Mirab faces great difficulty to set up a workable schedule (roster) of water releases. As a result, almost all the outlets would be left open to let the water continuously flow into the fields.Consequently, the smaller fields would be filled up quickly with the surplus water discharged to the drainage network, while the bigger plots would never be irrigated in full throughout the entire season. In fact, water releases would be made on a \"first come -first served' basis. It is also not uncommon in this situation that if a farmer is not present on his/her field while irrigating it, there will be always somebody to steal his/her water. So, given the whole new situation, the previously functional water management practices have turned up unsuitable or even redundant resulting in much of a chaos, inequities and unreliability in the present water delivery at the tertiary level and thus complicating poverty situation especially among those who are hydraulically more tailend located along irrigation canals.Experience elsewhere shows that bringing proper institutional change alone into the presently disrupted irrigation management by first helping farmers at the very grassroots to self-organize themselves into self-help water users groups (WUG) by each tertiary command with their own rules and principles developed to ensure proper canal maintenance, resource mobilization and water distribution based on their own understanding of what is equitable and fair, and then bringing all such tertiary self-help groups through their authorized representatives or leaders under one nested water users association (WUAs) at a higher secondary level, this also coupled with building required capacities of these new participatory institutions could be crucial in bridging existing gaps and problems and, thus, considerably improve irrigation performance and poverty situation. Involving water users in such a manner requires truly participatory approaches and methods, that are user-oriented and simple enough to be understood by farmers.One of such methods meant to help water users to solve their water problems at the onfarm level is water distribution based on time allocations which was pilot-tested in one of the WUAs in Osh Province of the Kyrgyz Republic during 2 consecutive cropping seasons in 2003 and 2004. When experimenting with the new approach the following two major assumptions were made:(i) Actual water demand for each off-take along the study tertiary canal is based on applicable crop water requirements; and(ii) The time required to deliver the requested amount of water is sufficient.To pilot-test the proposed time-based water distribution method, a tertiary canal (named Sokolok) was selected in WUA\"Japalak\" of Osh Province, Kirghizstan.. This canal can well be representive of a typical tertiary canal in today's Central Asia. The WUA in question was first founded in 1996, comprising 2,112 ha in the total irrigated service area. The command area of the study Sokolok canal is 290 ha with the length of about 6 km. Through its 14 registered quaternary off-takes it supplies water to a total of 473 water users. The maximum capacity of Sokolok at the off-take is 250 l/s. The tertiary receives water from the Aravan-Akbura main canal, which is one of the largest irrigation canals in the Osh Province, South Kirghizstan.. Major crops grown in the pilot canal area were wheat, corn, vegetables, potato, sunflower and apples. The cropping pattern when experimenting comprised 43.4% corn, 11.5% winter wheat, 3.3% sunflower, 3.1% vegetables such as onions, tomatoes, and cucumbers, and 2.1% orchards and fruit trees. Of the total command area, one third (34.6 %) was occupied by backyard gardens.The whole trial consisted of two phases. In the first phase -the spring-summer cropping season (April to October) of 2003 -it was the project staff who did and facilitated most of the actual trial and data collection processes when organizing and implementing the time-based water distribution method. In the second phase -during the spring-summer cropping season of 2004 -the water users were left alone to run the entire process on their own with the project staff just monitoring it and recording various data such as canal head discharges, irrigation duration by each off-take, cropping patterns, yields etc. There were two persons hired by the project in the first year to facilitate implementation and data collection. The data so collected included water discharges in the head of both the distributary canal and its off-takes, cropping patterns by each off-take, the number of hours each off-take was entitled and actually receiving water, any changes in water schedules, per capita incomes from crop cultivation, irrigation service fee collection rates,; any conflicts occurred throughout the season.Implementation of the proposed time-based water distribution method required good self-organization of the water users along the study distributary canal. WUA Japalak where the study canal is located was organized some 10 years ago in a top-down fashion with no much of an involvement on the part of the water users at large. So there had been no water users groups, formal or informal, in place. When meeting the local water users for the first time, this issue was deliberately raised and discussed with them at length. As a result all the water users met agreed that the formation of their self-help water users groups by each off-take was important. Within 2 weeks, such water users groups (WUG) were finally formed in all the 14 off-takes and their leaders elected. The WUG leaders were given authority to represent their water users when planning irrigation as well as when opening and closing the off-take gates as per irrigation schedule.Preparation of an irrigation schedule was central to implementing the time-based water distribution method. Consultations with the water users of the \"Sokolok\" canal suggested that the farmers preferred their irrigation turns to proceed from the head to the end of the canal. Thus, by April 1, 2003 the irrigation schedule for the first 10 days was prepared and approved by the water users. The schedule was very simple and farmer-friendly, specifying the exact time for each off-take concerned when to start and when to finish irrigation .As per the schedule, irrigation would start and finish at midnight on, respectively, the first and 10 th day of a 10-day cycle. Since night irrigations in the canal area had been already frequently practiced for the past 10 years, there were no objections from the water users to irrigate during the nighttime. In addition the water users agreed to stick to the following rules:(i) More than one off-take could be opened at a time to divert water;(ii) No exchanges of turns between off-takes should be allowed, and (iii) Should any of the off-takes tamper with the agreed turns schedule, it will be fined with turn cancellation next time when it will be its turn to irrigate.In addition, Mirab of the canal was asked to register any interruptions occurred during the course of schedule implementation. To make sure all water users along the canal are aware of the agreed irrigation schedule, it was decided to be put on an iron display in the head, middle and tail-end of the canal..Privatization, distribution and fragmentation of land of the former huge collective farms among newly established numerous middle to smallholder farmers led to the creation of two types of family farming in Central Asia: commercial and subsistence. The latter mostly comprising of tiny backyard garden owners, grow crops predominantly for selfconsumption to ensure their food security, being most prone to poverty. One of the most important crops for such small subsistence family farms to survive is wheat, so almost all such farms for food security reasons try to grow this crop. It should be though noted that those in the tail end of the selected canal in the study area had frequently failed to grow good wheat crop due to insufficient water reaching their fields. Thus, assuming that the proposed water distribution method could have improved water access for those in the tail-end, one would expect a considerable change in wheat yields if applying the method.The trend for the wheat yields in the study canal, following the first year of interventions (2003) was, in overall, positive. Average wheat yields of those in the tail-end off-takes (#10, 12) increased by 45-50% (Figure 1). At the same time there was a slight decline (3-4%) in the yields of those from the head-located off-takes (#1, #2). Nevertheless, in overall the wheat yields across all study off-takes were higher and more stable than in the baseline year (2002). However, some tail-located off-takes (9, 11, 13, and 14) still refrained from growing wheat in 2003, despite that the time-based water distribution employed in that year was an overall success. This was not because the farmers thought they had too tiny a land or lacked some inputs other than water. The major reason behind this was continued skepticism by the people in that their water availability could improve as a result of the new method The gross incomes by different off-takes of the study canal as reported by the respondents were quite varied due to differences in the cropping patterns, inputs applied and the costs of various other agricultural operations employed. The farmers with their main land holdings in the midstream off-takes (#7, 8, and 9) were residing in a village located along the off-take 14. So to avoid double-counting, the latter was not included in the income analysis. The residents here used canal water for both irrigating their home gardens and drinking. The yearly per-unit-of-area income earned by different off-takes in 2002 ranged from $100/ha (Off-take #9) to $800/ha (off-take No 3). There was clear indication that the farmers from the head-located off-takes were better off in their income generation (Figure 3). The off-takes 7 to 10 as well as 12 and 13 showed the lowest per-unit-of-area income generated. Most likely this was a result of different cropping patterns employed by different off-takes: while those in the upstream grew wheat and high value vegetables (peppers, tomatoes), those in the downstream offtakes cultivated corn and low value vegetables (e.g. pumpkin). In addition, those in the upstream grew 2 crops per season, while those from the downstream -only one crop.With the general trend in per-unit-of-area incomes remaining the same in 2003, the mean income generated across all study off-takes increased. Increases in incomes generated by the farmers in the off-takes 6 through 13 were higher than those for the off-takes #1 to #5 (Figure 1).Basic assumption for this indicator holds that if water distribution improves water users are more willing to pay for WUA services. There is direct relationship between total fees collected and the quality of services provided since better water distribution helps boost farmers' incomes. During the intervention period no specific attempts were made by the WUA to improve financial discipline. Therefore, any changes in the total fee collected can be viewed as an impact from the time-based water distribution method employed.The analysis of total water fees collected in 2002-2003 suggests there is no relationship between the size of per-unit-of-area income and the size of irrigation service fee (Figure 5). The water users from the off-takes that generated lower per-area-of-unit incomes paid the same or more in water fees both in 2002 and 2003. Likewise, the water users from the downstream off-takes paid more in water service fees than those from the upstream ones. Though water charges in Kyrgyzstan were introduced in mid-90's, the water users are still reluctant to pay for irrigation services. It should be though noted that service fee collection in all the study off-takes, but for #1, 5 and 12, increased by 1.5 to 2.0 times as a result of the intervention.The above action research discussed clearly suggests that if actions and processes are properly understood and taken up by the users themselves they are most likely to sustain. The logic behind this is simple: it is farmers themselves who would clearly feel the difference and make out all the benefits and losses from whatever interventions they are suggested or made a part of. On the other hand, when properly enabled and facilitated, the results of the interventions that are actively participated and co-owned by water users including when planning and implementing them become much more sustainable than when imposed top-down. Therefore, the process of water distribution at WUA level must be somewhat more flexible, simple, participatory and socially acceptable in order to sustain. Distributing water using inadequate water use planning practices of the past as is still the case now, tends to turn farmers merely into passive beneficiaries thus failing to provide proper incentives for them to more actively improve their social self-organization and cohesion around common issues emanating from sharing one canal so that they could develop, negotiate and follow their internally accepted rules and principles such as for canal maintenance, water distribution, resource mobilization etc., as well as to defend their vested rights (including those to water) and interests as an organized group when dealing with other similar groups especially those from the upstream or higher hydraulic levels. Thus, continuous inaction or even resistance to bring change to this situation is actually equal to holding fast to the destined-to-be dead body of the top-down management paradigm. After all, solving major water distribution problems this way has never been a success in the past.Moreover, this could become even a major obstacle for water users to be more actively involved in water management. Therefore, the only way to move things forward would be devising truly participatory solutions that can effectively help in overcoming and alleviating the ubiquitous and continuous inequities, grievances, unfairness and tensions between those in the tail-end and those in the head of canals when distributing water, thus, making the former, more secure in getting their due share of water as they might be entitled to."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1993765087.json b/main/part_2/1993765087.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb1c9706fa9e61421d65b0a73d73a929ea6fdc0a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1993765087.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5f3a11c3600c5cd3f083f75f6d3e8fa6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f13cef0f-b831-4a74-bb42-8b7667d46697/retrieve","id":"-503194915"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"fdf35607-dd97-456e-9316-61f4b7555359","content":"The 13 th meeting of the CGIAR System Council approved the 2022 -2024 CGIAR Investment Prospectus. With this approval came the request of a CGIAR-authored Companion Document 1 (CD) that would detail the approach used to build a coherent and cohesive group of Initiatives to advance the 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy. System Council requested the Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC) to assess the CD concurrently during the ISDC external review of the initial 19 Initiative proposals (September 30 to November 18). System Council tasked ISDC to review the CD based on the four criteria of external coherence, internal coherence, interdependencies, and management of funding uncertainties. In addition, ISDC included a question in each proposal review that asked Does the Initiative align with the cohesion of the portfolio as described in the CD? The assessment of the CD includes sections on CD strengths, overall considerations, detailed responses to each criterion, and the responses for each proposal review question (for the latter see Appendix A).ISDC is aware of the enormous challenges that the new management and leadership teams of One CGIAR are experiencing and the limited time they had to establish a new modus operandi. The CD provides strong evidence that the new structure is now operational and that it has a high chance of delivering the new mission. ISDC hopes the review will accelerate the transition towards a sciencebased innovation culture across One CGIAR.The CD is a well-considered and an important complementary resource to the 2022 -2024 CGIAR Investment Prospectus that outlines the context and framework used in Initiative codesign. The CD addresses the four criteria requested by System Council and focuses on the operational aspects of the Initiative development process. The CD further outlines the mechanisms that will be used to adaptively manage the portfolio. ISDC acknowledges that the more than two-year consultation process for the Prospectus was given high priority during considerable timing pressure and in a COVID-affected environment.ISDC appreciates and compliments the Executive Management Team and colleagues for establishing a nested Theories of Change (ToCs) approach that logically links the overarching CGIAR-level ToCs, which cascade to the three Action Areas and ultimately to the individual Initiatives and their work packages. The long-term 2030 vision for each Initiative, alongside the three-year work packages, facilitates alignment of the Initiatives with the 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy. Although evidence of such alignment is missing from the CD, this may be provided in more detail within the 32 Initiative proposals. 2 The coherence and cohesion in Initiative delivery demonstrates the new One CGIAR governance structure in action. This is instrumental for stakeholders not closely involved in the reform process to provide evidence of new management of complex problems. A coherent and cohesive portfolio helps to build confidence that the new structure will be able to better deliver on the CGIAR mission.Overall, the financial planning at one-and three-year time scales are sensible. The principle of each Initiative being considered for at least some inception funding to explore the potential is practical and should be supported. The ISDC endorsement of this principle is based on the assumption that the portfolio of Initiatives was constructed to ensure One CGIAR's delivery on all key strategic objectives and that each of the 32 Initiatives makes important co-contributions to others and are therefore essential for their success (i.e., the issue of interdependencies). The goal should be to ensure that outputs and outcomes contribute to a cohesive One CGIAR portfolio with a balance between short-and long-term investments. ISDC supports the idea of seed funding based on the stated goal and assumption. However, after the seed stage, ISDC urges a curated portfolio approach; this means to avoid funding distribution simply to achieve parity across the 32 Initiatives.The reasoning behind Regional Integrated Initiatives (RIIs) is well articulated and highlights the need for co-ownership, positioning CGIAR as innovation brokers-not always the originator of innovations-and \"demand creation and solution feedback loops.\" Using prototyping with a focus on planetary boundaries is a real strength.The CD includes important processes and principles that will drive the engagement with external partners. Although much of this is still aspirational and a work in progress, ISDC appreciates its inclusion. Thoughtful and inclusive preparation of a Partnerships Engagement Framework deserves strong support and will be an essential deliverable during the inception phase of Initiatives. This will require sustained efforts and investments.The following includes overarching considerations grouped by comparative advantage, partnerships, priority setting and funding, coordination and management, and innovation in the CD across the four assessment criteria.While the emphasis on process is appropriate, the CD misses the more visionary aspects of the portfolio and a narrative explaining why CGIAR is uniquely positioned to lead these 32 Initiatives. A clearly stated response to why CGIAR is ideally suited to deliver on the aspirations of the 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy would have been helpful in framing a clear and evidence-based statement of CGIAR comparative advantage. ISDC underscores an urgent need to develop a systemwide, methodological approach to the identification and articulation of comparative advantage.The need for a better understanding of comparative advantage is evident from the CD and the individual Initiative proposals. The CD does not articulate how One CGIAR will ensure that the Initiatives proposed speak to the comparative advantage of CGIAR vis-a-vis other country, regional, and global players. Part of the 2022 ISDC workplan is to advise System Council and other stakeholders on a systemwide approach to define CGIAR's comparative advantage.A comparative advantage systemwide approach is particularly important in new areas of research where CGIAR might not yet have a comparative advantage, but decides for legitimate, strategic reasons to invest and engage. A statement, answering \"Why CGIAR?\" is imperative for each Initiative, and especially for new CGIAR research topics where potentially unfamiliar partnerships must be explored and developed.Without having the Partnerships Engagement Framework in place, assessment of how partnerships are transparently identified, defined, and managed is challenging. The CD does not elaborate on how partnerships will be initiated, monitored, or evaluated. Without adequate relationship mapping across all 32 Initiatives, a comprehensive consideration of overlaps, synergies, and co-dependencies is absent. Further elaboration on partnership mechanisms for interaction and codelivery of outputs, outcomes, and impacts would be helpful. To achieve the 2030 collective global targets in the Results Framework Table, scaling partners will be vital. Additional explanation of how scaling partners will be engaged, and the approaches needed to build their capacity is desirable.The CD emphasizes that \"purposeful partnership\" building and stewardship will be instrumental to active, adaptive management of external coherence across the CGIAR portfolio of research and investment. An important consideration is inclusive and functional partnerships to address the Impact Areas and unreachable populations. This includes partnerships that consider gender, diversity, and inclusion (GDI), early-career scientists, and farmers. Partnership elaboration at all levels is warranted.The Advisory Services Shared Secretariat external evaluation CRP reports and Synthesis emphasized partnership recommendations and learning that should be incorporated across the portfolio and strategic planning. The CD lacks details on how private-sector agents will be engaged as partners and how these engagements will be legitimately managed. 3 One recommendation from the Synthesis that should be emphasized is: \"The CRPs have focused primarily on government, community, and ARI partnerships, but engaging the private sector will be critical for scaling innovations. Where CRPs did work with the private sector to extend innovations, there was no evidence of a private sector engagement strategy or analysis of the effectiveness and lessons learned from these efforts.\" 4 The CD does not outline how this recommendation will be strategically implemented. Partnership development requires relationship management and CGIAR staff will need capacity development to ensure private-sector partnership success.The criteria for priority setting are outlined in item 19 but lack specificity that would allow quantitative and qualitative priority assessments. The CD also lacks a contingency plan for uncertainties that would allow CGIAR to be flexible, employ more novel strategic approaches, and work closely with existing and potential funders. Worth noting is this CD review only includes insight of the initial 19 Initiative proposals. While Figure 3 (p. 6) seeks to illustrate the interlinkages across the 19 Initiatives, without an interpretation these linkages appear random. Further, any interlinkages with the remaining 13 Initiatives that have not yet been reviewed are missing. The network analysis provided in Figure 4 (\"Initiative Partner Network\" p. 13) and Figure 8 (\"Indicative Scaling Readiness metrics including shared Innovation Package plan\" p. 21) only make sense if and when the entire portfolio is included. Hence, ISDC strongly recommends mapping the substantive priorities for shortand long-term research across all 32 Initiatives, with a clear process for priority setting and review.The CD presents the need for revision of some Initiatives depending on funders' preference and ISDC feedback. Except for inception funding for the Initiatives to start in 2022, the process for revisions is not detailed (especially the how, when, and where). Notably, will revisions be written during Initiative startup and how will these modifications be shared publicly?Except for item 73, the CD is silent on how pooled-funded Initiatives will be effectively integrated with activities funded from other sources. While details are limited, section 4.1 outlines the Integrated Results Framework and suggests a potential solution to integrate pooled and non-pooled funded activities into a comprehensive portfolio. Crop-by-region combination priority must include climate adaptation and mitigation and environmental health and biodiversity. This is in addition to the mentioned entries and alignment with recommendations from the Crops to End Hunger Initiative. The efforts cited are a useful and necessary start. ISDC recommends a dramatic expansion and/or clear record of the thought processes surrounding strategic cohesion across all CGIAR work, no matter the funding source.The Impact Area Platforms will have a fundamental role, providing the imperative cross-cutting collaboration and communication across the portfolio. Their purpose is clearly outlined: they are there to support Initiatives rather than to compete. While the Platforms fill a need, staffing requirements and skillsets are unclear: how will these Platforms achieve their mandate and how will they work with Science Groups, Regional Directors, and the portfolio performance management team? Does CGIAR have the necessary social scientists that will be needed for these Impact Area Platforms to succeed? Innovation \"Innovation\" is a common theme throughout the CD and, in fact, all CGIAR documents. In many instances, innovation is used synonymously with terms such as \"technology\" or \"research outputs.\" The liberal use of the term degrades its meaning and while CGIAR has defined what innovation means to the System, 5 more clarity on what really constitutes innovation and what an innovation culture entails is urgently needed. A better understanding of the mix of incremental, breakthrough, and transformational innovations that are envisaged within and across Initiatives would provide clarity and help with portfolio risk management (see ISDC's Innovation Brief prepared for the 14 th meeting of System Council for associated recommendations on the topic).Item 22 addresses the bundling of innovations by linking the technical aspects to policies, while item 30a explicitly states the need for creating space for new research without degrading areas of existing strength. Both, bundling and balancing strength with novelty, are important mechanisms to ensure that innovations lead to impact. This also links with the concept of a \"transfer marketplace\" for priority assets (golden eggs; item 46), which is an innovative institutional mechanism that should be developed further.This section provides detailed responses to the Systems Council assessment criteria of external coherence, internal coherence, interdependencies, and management of funding uncertainties.Recommendation: Map CGIAR's comparative advantage with country, regional, and global players that may be partners or competitors. Elaborate on how the proposed Initiatives will seek complementarity with efforts of other research institutions, or how One CGIAR seeks to harmonize efforts by a range of global players.One CGIAR's Initiatives were informed by several well-coordinated and timely inputs from a range of consultations with the Investment Advisory Groups (IAGs) and Transition Advisory Groups (TAGs). Extensive regional, national, and stakeholder consultations helped gauge demand for research proposed and identified research, demand, and scaling partnerships. Further, the principle of triangulation (use of global evidence base, stakeholder demands, and investor preferences), to arrive at proposed Initiatives and partnerships appears robust. However, the CD does not elaborate on how external coherence will be ensured across geographies and what the balance of these efforts would be across the RIIs, nor how to manage external coherence on an ongoing basis. The coordination mechanisms in place-the Regional Directors, Science Directors, and Impact Area Platforms-generally appear sound for ensuring regional and thematic external coherence.While the CD articulates key mechanisms in place to identify innovation, demand, and scaling partners, it does not outline how One CGIAR will ensure that the Initiatives speak to the comparative advantage of the CGIAR vis-a-vis other country, regional, and global players. The CD does not elaborate on how the proposed Initiatives will seek complementarity with efforts of other research institutions, or how One CGIAR seeks to harmonize efforts across a range of global players, especially in new research areas for CGIAR. There is no clearly articulated strategy that outlines an approach to partnerships to achieve external coherence. There is also little reference to any desirable engagements with the external academic world. Considering how One CGIAR might influence global research efforts and how such efforts in turn could benefit the One CGIAR mission are still lacking.The current articulation of partnerships presumes, for the most part, that One CGIAR has all the needed scientific and academic competencies and that partnerships are needed to ensure demand and scaling of the \"innovations\" identified. While this might be the case in some instances where CGIAR has evidenced comparative advantages, it is rarely true in new areas of research that form a key plank of the new 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy and in which CGIAR is not the lead actor. This should be acknowledged and inform the emerging strategy for recruitment and capacity building.The CD does not outline how the Initiatives might act as global convenors, enablers, and facilitators of science to practice. It is possible that the Partnerships Engagement Framework (yet to be launched) will address the key issue of One CGIAR's positionality, comparative advantage, and its role in fostering global science for development. Hopefully this would move beyond a narrow, transactional perspective that views such engagement purely as a means towards achieving CGIAR's objectives, which is necessary but not sufficient.Further, what mechanism(s) will be established to ensure external coherence? Will these be Impact Area Platforms, which are networks to facilitate exchange with CGIAR? Will the Platforms' role be expanded to assurance of external coherence and its monitoring? The CD does not expand on monitoring and evaluating partnerships, although several Initiatives include some aspects. These details will presumably be included in the Partnerships Engagement Framework.among the portfolio's constituent parts? Is there evidence of a clear focus on coordinated management of various partnerships that facilitate connectivity between Initiatives, themes, and regions? Is this aligned with the CGIAR's Performance and Results Management Framework and underpinned by a unified Theory of Change?Recommendation: Explore opportunities to detail how leadership and teams among the Science Groups, Regional Directors, and Impact Areas will work together and where the authority lies to avoid unnecessary transaction costs associated with complex management structures. Responsibilities and authority need to be well aligned and lines of authority and responsibility should be clarified.The detailed engagement among key players and their extensive discussions was designed to deliver an agreed, aligned, and prioritized portfolio of activities that address the five Impact Areas. Such engagement is intended to avoid duplication, resolve boundary issues, and prevent silos. The process and outcomes of the extensive consultations resulted in a logical and well-designed highlevel framework with nested ToCs that clearly indicate how the Initiatives should interact at various levels of the portfolio. The ToCs also are aligned with the Performance and Results Management Framework with three types of results (outputs, outcomes, and impacts) and acknowledgement that CGIAR has direct control only for outputs.Figure 3 (p. 6) attempts to show the linkages between the first 19 Initiatives. Some of the Initiatives are designed to be cross-cutting and -thematic (e.g., Harnessing Digital Technologies for Timely Decision-Making across Food, Land, and Water Systems). However, without an interpretation the linkages appear unintentional. Figure 3 does not contribute to a better understanding of internal coherence. The linkages are more easily seen and understood from the individual Initiative ToCs. The overall cohesion/coherence of the portfolio will need further assessment after the second set of Initiatives have been reviewed. Management mechanisms are described for the operational oversight of developing and maintaining internal coherence as well as avoiding duplication or overlap. These mechanisms involve Science Group staff and their communication with Regional Directors and the portfolio performance management team. The Initiatives will be managed operationally through the various management teams to \"build in\" cohesion, with the three Science Group Directors expected to play a key role in oversight working closely together. Impact Area Platforms are the main mechanism to drive internal coherence. Membership of the Impact Area Platforms and the portfolio performance management team will be critical but these details and how they will work with Science Groups and Regional Directors are missing. The CD simply states that the Impact Area Platforms members will be drawn from all divisions as appropriate and will form \"networks within the system, rather than stand-alone dimensions of a matrix structure.\"Clarity also is lacking on how the various directors (Science Groups, Regional Directors, and Impact Areas) will work together and where the authority lies. Clarification of these details would be useful. For example, a diagram showing organizational structure and reporting lines, including management and communication among the groups, would be beneficial. This complex management structure may generate a lot of additional transaction costs (large numbers of meetings, negotiations, etc.) and may, therefore, cause delays and impact the effectiveness of the planned research over the three-year cycle. Balancing operational imperatives with issues of probity and effectiveness will be an ongoing challenge for all leadership teams. Hence, it will be paramount to align responsibilities for delivery with the necessary authorities for decision-making. Many science-based organizations suffer from an uneven distribution of responsibility and authority, with some sections having responsibility without authority, while others having authority without responsibility. Such an uneven distribution inhibits the development of an innovation culture.A critical area identified to benefit from the internal cohesion generated through Initiatives and Platforms is capacity development. However, the CD is silent on the type of approaches needed to develop and retain capacity within CGIAR. Capacity development is simply presented as something that will happen rather than identifying how Initiatives and Platforms could proactively create opportunities for capacity development. In fact, several of the Initiative reviews recommended improvements on the Quality of Research for Development criterion 14 (\"Capacity building within project teams, partners, and stakeholders captured in capacity development plan\").There are some positive examples that will foster internal coherence while lowering transaction costs. For instance, it is encouraging to read that Genebanks (item 17) might be approved on a continuous basis. Another highlight is that mechanisms are in place to carry forward \"golden egg\" assets from the CRPs that will help to maintain effectiveness over the next three years.Does the CD articulate a conceptionally rational and effective approach to manage interdependencies between the Initiatives? Are there any significant areas of overlap or duplication of effort? How will these be identified, managed, or resolved? Recommendation: Carefully review the six RII proposals and the CD to ensure no duplication exists with the Global Thematic Initiatives. This review should include a strategy on how country offices will work with RIIs.The vision of interconnected thematic and regionally integrated Initiatives is generally sound. Impact Area Platforms and RIIs provide mechanisms to address interdependencies: for capturing complementarities among Initiatives, minimizing unnecessary duplication of effort, identifying, and closing key gaps in the portfolio, and helping with effective data and partnership stewardship. While the vision articulated in the CD is generally thorough, correspondence with the RII proposals is somewhat wanting, perhaps because the CD was developed in parallel to the first two of the RII proposals. Little detail is provided beyond a partial page (section 3.2) in the CD on the operationalization of the Impact Area Platforms.As reflected in Figure 5 (p. 14), RIIs are central to CGIAR delivery of research for development. The RIIs seem natural hubs for both trade-offs and foresight analyses at country and regional scale, for leading partnership management and data stewardship with stakeholders within the regions. The two RII proposals received thus far (for South Asia and East and Southern Africa) seem uneven in their fidelity to the vision articulated in the CD. At least one seems to propose considerable fieldand landscape-scale research apart from the Global Thematic Initiatives. That seems likely to invite duplication of efforts and internal competition that could prove wasteful. Country and regional offices are the natural locus for convening stakeholders to identify sociotechnical innovation bundles appropriate to the policy, institutional, and agri-environmental contexts. The CD is largely silent about this role. RIIs and country offices seem best conceptualized as platforms (and the continuous development of better platforms) for the assembly of innovations developed by the Global Thematic Initiatives and external partners to achieve impacts, rather than as the originators of new research work packages themselves. ISDC sees this vision in the CD, but not entirely in the two RII proposals reviewed so far, so some further coordination work seems necessary.The CD is also silent on how country offices will work with RIIs. This gap needs attention. The subsidiarity principle raised in item 57 might guide the division of labor among RIIs and country offices. CGIAR must recognize that this principle entails not just devolving authority to those closest to partners, but also to the lowest spatial scale for relevant external entities to become internal. Also unclear is how the RIIs will coordinate around global challenges (e.g., climate change, inclusion of historically underrepresented groups, and interregional migration) with which most or all must grapple.The details of how the Impact Area Platforms will implement this vision is largely absent. Impact Area Platforms \"will be networks within the system,\" following the communities of practice model that CGIAR has used with some success already. These seem like coordinating networks. But where gaps or overlaps emerge through dialogue within the Impact Area Platforms network, who resolves those issues? Lines of authority and responsibility need clearer definition. It seems natural for the Foresight Global Thematic Initiative to play a key role in informing Impact Area Platforms, but that is not raised in the CD. The need to continuously assess trade-offs across Impact Areas should be addressed.The Partnerships Engagement Framework is not yet available. The principle of subsidiarity should apply to partner and data management. In many countries, national statistical offices have rapidly expanding capacity and generate extensive, reasonably high-quality data (e.g., nationally representative household surveys, many of them longitudinal, and streams of high-resolution Earth Observation data from remote sensing platforms) that CGIAR must be alert to and then leverage effectively.Integration and coordination will be an ongoing process. The Impact Area Platforms and RIIs have the potential to be efficient, effective devices for enhancing interconnectedness and avoiding wasteful duplication. Getting the details of these mechanisms right will require ongoing work.The CD also lacks vision and information on how CGIAR will invest in obtaining causal evidence on specific targets, mentioned in item 80. Research designs and data collection to obtain such credible, causal evidence will need to be built in from the start. Items 85b and c state that CGIAR, at the portfolio level, will make investments in:• large data collection to measure the reach and impact of CGIAR innovations; and• independent evaluation and impact assessment designed as integral part of research to causally test impacts. However, no information is provided on where and how this will be operationalized. Furthermore, the CD remains silent on what resources will be allocated and how CGIAR will assure that this work will use frontier research methods to meet the required standards of rigor (a real concern given the long-time erosion of social science research capacity in many parts of CGIAR).Does the CD clearly explain the approach to prioritization? How will funding be allocated? Does the Executive Management Team have a risk management approach in place to allocate limited funds without risking the coherence of the overall portfolio should some Initiatives not get funded?Recommendation: The CD needs to map the CGIAR's substantive priorities for short-and long-term research, with a clear process for priority setting and review that is evidence based.The CD broadly explains how Initiatives will be prioritized based on overall delivery of the 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy. The CD acknowledges that some Initiatives will receive more and others less priority and requests that Initiative proposals be developed in accordance. The CD states that new and more explorative Initiatives will be allocated smaller initial inceptions. The request for all Initiatives to receive at least some seed funding seems reasonable, if the Initiatives meet or exceed the minimum quality standards.The CD, however, does not detail the approach to prioritization nor is there an articulation of risk management procedures or a plan to fill gaps. The CD states that the Executive Management Team's risk management approach will detail and ensure that a coherent portfolio will be maintained even if some Initiatives will not get funded. The CD is silent on details of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing of risks followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability and/or impact of unforeseen events or emerging risks.While there is a recognition that financial resources may be insufficient to accommodate all requirements, there are no alternative strategies identified and the CD lacks risk management and scenario planning. Since the Initiatives are not alike, the risk management approach and plan must be tailored to the scope and complexity of individual Initiatives. The CD also lacks a contingency plan for the more difficult uncertainties to allow CGIAR to work more flexibly, employ more novel strategic approaches, and work more closely with existing and potential funders.ISDC recommends mapping CGIAR's substantive priorities for short-and long-term research, with a clear process for priority setting and review that is evidence based. This will be essential for CGIAR to secure a solid base of funding for a coherent program of research for development. A clear articulation of how this will be achieved is still lacking.An implicit priority is to address impacts of climate change on agricultural production, aligned with CGIAR's mission statement that focuses on systems in a climate crisis. Some Initiative proposals are more closely aligned with this goal than others. However, agreeing on any single goal as a priority seems to be difficult when considering diverging priorities in the regional and country contexts and within current CGIAR governance processes. A prioritization approach that accommodates multiple strategic goals, including climate impacts, may be a more appropriate prioritization architecture. Furthermore, without a solid base of funding, any coherence is likely to disintegrate, and centers and researchers will be left to chase bilateral support and resources, including people.The stated focus on faster replacement rates and varietal turnover and adoption of new varieties is not necessarily aligned with the GI aim of addressing the challenge of the limited and decreasing biodiversity underpinning our crop and food systems, nor does it appear to sufficiently recognize the importance of context-specificity and indigenous knowledge. Diversity is an important element of resilience and how Genebanks, the GI Action Area, and One CGIAR will support messaging and action around the importance of diversity in fields and diets is not clear. The focus in the current text on just a few very specific traits in a limited range of crops appears contradictory to this.The crucial role of co-created new partnership models is flagged in the CD but does not permeate sufficiently through the continuum of the six GI Initiatives to be integral within Genebanks. What important partnership-and behavior-related outcome changes can Genebanks influence, and how?The Genebanks proposal does not provide sufficient granularity on activity details to enable meaningful Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning (MEL). That in turn prevents understanding of planned methods or opportunities for cohesion between proposals, and thus thwarts MEL of the cohesion of the portfolio. The details are necessary and important. Currently, the only Genebanks indicator listed in the Results Framework Table (CD's Annex 1) is GIi 1.1 Number of accessions data used at various levels of the breeding pipeline (level of use: used in crosses, backcrosses, incorporated in elite germplasm. More attention to improved processes and efficiencies, and to partnership and capacity-related metrics would be beneficial.Pursuant with principles in the CD, EiA builds on existing research expertise with a strong presence in high priority geographies. EiA proposes strong linkages with scaling partners that have a comparative advantage in working with farmers and rigorous procedures for establishing new collaborations. Significant collaborations with CGIAR's global, system, and regional Initiatives are proposed, as are modalities for these collaborations. EiA plans to use standard protocols for data management and Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning (MEL) activities to facilitate these collaborations. Connections with Impact Area Platforms need greater elaboration. Funding uncertainty was identified as a risk but plans for addressing it are inadequate.Internal coherence: The efforts to align LCSR with the portfolio are good: the narrative is fairly clear, and some aspects are a definite step forward from previous practices. The Initiative's ToC aligns well with the Resilient Agricultural Food Systems ToC. Do projected benefits in LCSR contribute sufficiently to overall CGIAR targets? For example, projected 2030 benefits in the Poverty Impact Area of LCSR are 2.96 million people out of an overall CGIAR target in the CD of 500 million people.Research questions and methods as described in the work packages provide confidence in the science quality proposed but it is difficult to put this in the context of the overall CD because it uses more rudimentary indicators such as numbers of peer-reviewed papers and altimetric scores. External coherence: Country prioritization is logically argued and is consistent with the approaches set out in the CD. Partnerships to achieve impact are a key element in the CD but this area is a little vague in the LCSR proposal. This is in part due to proposal word limit but approaches to scaling through national commitment could be more clearly articulated.The Initiative certainly aligns with the portfolio as it aims to ensure that improved varieties contribute to productivity gains, but also generate a well-balanced portfolio of impacts across all five Impact Areas. It also aligns with the rigorous use of Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessment (MELIA) for similar impacts. In addition, the leadership plans are sound and in keeping with the aim of identifying bottlenecks, designing a scaling strategy, and monitoring change for use of innovations. It is important to recognize that change is hard.External coherence (country, regional, global levels): This is covered reasonably well, although some reviewers questioned the choice of and criteria used to select the seven countries in MITIGATE+ (Table 1, Initiative proposal).Internal coherence including Impact Area Platforms: The proposal has good documentation of the expected amount of CO2-e averted and the number of people benefitting from climate resilient innovations. While the descriptions of the work packages are clearly laid out, the linkages between the research plan and main proposed scientific methods are not evident: this leads to a lack of continuity between the research plan, scientific methods, and outputs. This could be simply improved with consistent titles and subtitles for example.Interdependencies between other thematic/regional Initiatives: These are well mapped (linkage with ClimBeR, NEXUS Gains, SAPLING, LCSR, EiA, SHiFT, etc.) although additional detail on how constituent parts of MITIGATE+ depend on other Initiatives is required. Improved clarity regarding the linkages between work packages, methods and End-of-Initiative outcomes are also required.Management of funding uncertainties: This seems to be completely absent from the proposal. Aside from total budgets in section 10.1, no other information on the budget is apparent and appears to be a shortcoming in the proposal template design. More detail of intended management (including metrics) is required.Integrated results framework at Initiative, Action Area, and CGIAR Levels: In general, this is well covered.Measurement and reporting at multiple levels and timeframes: The management plan and Gannt table in section 7.2 contains annual \"pause and reflect\" workshops, but how this reflection will be subsequently acted upon is unclear. Ex-post impact assessments of the work packages are well covered in the proposal, but ex-post assessments of the monitoring and evaluation (and how this assessment will be used to refine management going forwards) could be more transparent. The linkage of management to the work packages could be better detailed (metrics, aim, achievability and timing). With its strong focus on national-level policies and strategies, NPS has a critical role in the CGIAR portfolio. The proposal does a good job of identifying the main Initiatives and offices (RII) with which it will need to coordinate. What is less clear-from both the NPS proposal and the CD-is how the country-level interdependencies will be managed, practically. For example:In its six focus countries, will NPS take the lead on coordinating ALL national policy and strategy work for Initiatives with a policy element? For example, on p. 11, NPS highlights opportunities to examine the experiences with safety net programs in Egypt and Kenya.Although micronutrient/dietary diversity is not a focus of NPS, presumably another Initiative will tackle this. How would the work of (potentially) multiple Initiatives targeting safety net programs be coordinated at the country level?1. NPS focuses on national policies and strategies but will have a specific policy focus in several pre-defined areas (Table 1, p. 10.) NPS will analyze trade-offs among policy options within those specific areas. But at country level, how/who will support governments in undertaking a wider-lens meta-analysis to show costs, benefits, trade-offs among investments across multiple sectors (per the charge of UNFSS, and to inform national ag transformation strategies)? And how would those results be reflected in NPS and other Initiatives? This seems like a step that must be taken before countries can decide on the policy priorities implied by NPS (and other \"targeted\" policy Initiatives).The Initiative aligns well with the cohesion of the portfolio, as exemplified by the following (among the 92 items of the CD):The Initiative builds on a clear consultation process, including regional advisory forums and structured regional consultation in Initiative design. The codesign process is very well described, there's a participatory design process to gather input from various stakeholders (including NARES breeding platforms).The Initiative is fitting with the CGIAR's Research and Innovation Strategy and is a high priority area aligned with funders priorities.Through the implementation of novel methods to accelerate the improvement of crops, N4ETTSS has explicit connections with other Genetic Innovation Initiatives, such as Market intelligence and product profiling, Genebanks, and ABI. Thus, N4ETTSS impacts will initially occur through ABI, with ABI's success influenced by Market Intelligence and Product Profiling, Genebanks, and SeEdQUAL.From a comparative advantage, CGIAR has a presence in and knowledge of the many countries where it works and has institutional links, combined with a solid scientific reputation. These solid and trusted relationships will be leveraged to promote the adoption of tools, technologies, and shared services by NARES.Although the timeframe for Initiatives is three years, N4ETTSS has built its ToC that identifies plausible pathways to generate impact over a 10-year period. This recognizes the longer timeframes needed for achieving meaningful impact. The problem statement aligns effectively with the System Transformation Action Area priorities in the CGIAR Investment Prospectus, specifically as a \"broader, integrating effort to tackle climate change, NRM, and nutrition/health,\" to \"identify place-based programs in priority agroecologies,\" and to \"address contextual food-land-water challenges.\" These trace through convincingly to impact on Action Areas. However, a clear mechanism to make an effective regional impact is not clear, regional inter-country governance is almost unmentioned.The problem statement aligns effectively with the System Transformation Action Area priorities in the CGIAR Investment Prospectus, specifically as a \"broader, integrating effort to tackle climate change, NRM, and nutrition/health,\" to \"identify place-based programs in priority agroecologies,\" and to \"address contextual food-land-water challenges.\" These trace through convincingly to impact on Action Areas. However, a clear mechanism to make an effective regional impact is not clear, regional inter-country governance is almost unmentioned.Cohesion of the CRP portfolio was an important aspiration during Phase II. However, the level of cohesion was limited due to lack of alignment among individual CRP priorities. Lessons must be learned from this to inform One CGIAR. CD's Figure 3 (p. 6) shows how the planned Initiatives will link together for cohesion. Plant Health and Rapid Response to Protect Food Security and Livelihoods Initiative has close links with Genebanks, SeEdQual, ABI, EiA and Market Intelligence and Product Profiling but does not appear to be linked to One Health (for mycotoxins) and MITIGATE+ (IDPM strategies). As priorities in different Initiatives will be decided by different teams how will cohesion be achieved? (Note: while there is no mention of mycotoxins in One Health, yet this was an important part of A4NH).A related concern is the multitude of links with the RIIs for scaling innovations. There will be considerable transaction costs and competition among all Initiatives. How will priorities be decided and what will happen to the lower priority innovations? The management structure detailed in the CD is very complex and most importantly, lacks clear hierarchy or lines of authority which could lead to delays in making decisions. There is a need for clear prioritization principles and guidelines as well as designated independent arbiter to make final decisions. Portfolio integration is a high priority for One CGIAR.This Initiative clearly aligns with the cohesion of the portfolio as part of the Resilient Agrifood Systems Action Area. Linkages to other projects in livestock production, markets, gender, and peri-urban agriculture are noted in the connections diagram in the CD. This Initiative will clearly contribute to collective global targets in health and food security and to all the Action Area outcomes (both shared and specific) for Resilient Agrifood Systems. Vertical cohesion: The Initiative is structured based on the ToC framework and hence it aligns well with the CGIAR result framework (cf. CD's Figure 6 and Annex 1), which is basically an application of the classical ToC. However, this model works well when Initiatives are top-down and/or unidirectional, moving from activities, to outputs, outcomes, and impacts, assuming causalities between these steps and an if-then logic. This model is, however, not always applicable-almost never to co-innovation approaches in agroecology, which are emic, bottom up, co-constructed, adaptive, emergent, and where the role of researchers and development agents is to facilitate, to broker knowledge, to create a dialogue of wisdoms to support self-investment, a sense of ownership and a risk-taking attitude by local actors, motivated by their active participation in a co-innovation process. Problems are addressed as they emerge, and solutions are developed through trial and error, experimenting together between different actors of a platform. There is no participant in such platforms that poses itself above the others, setting the agenda, deciding on the problems to be addressed or their priority. The Initiative evaluated here still speaks of \"delivering CGIAR innovations\" or \"agroecology interventions,\" which shows that the authors have no experience on how innovations emerge in the realm of agroecology.Lateral cohesion: This Initiative is part of the overarching results framework that comprises the 32 Initiatives that will be deployed by the CGIAR as from January 2022. Many (or most) of the scientists participating in this Initiative will also participate in other CGIAR Initiatives, and several Initiatives will be implemented in exactly the same target regions (and likely with the same households and communities). However, the messages conveyed by these different Initiatives are often contradictory. This will create confusion among the partners and beneficiaries on the ground. If the CGIAR wants to take up agroecology as its main approach to ag innovation and rural development, then the entire portfolio of 32 Initiatives should follow an agroecological approach. If the motivation of the CGIAR is to take up agroecology because the funders push for this, then a major transformation is needed across CGIAR, including capacity development and engagement with new types of social actors. Alternatively, CGIAR authorities could explain to funders that their core business is ecological or sustainable intensification, and not agroecology. Agroecology is a different paradigm for which the CGIAR has not been designed for or properly equipped.The Initiative should enhance the cohesion of the portfolio and demonstrate measurable and verifiable outputs, outcomes, and impacts in line with CGIAR results framework. This shortcoming is especially visible in work packages 4 and 5. Connection of the research to policy is especially weak. This shortcoming could be overcome by providing justification through robust institutional analyses that shows how TAFSSA can produce verifiable outcomes and impact for programs and policy. Greater clarity is needed on \"open-access system\" that TAFSSA proposes to demonstrate the potential of the Initiative to support co-production of knowledge and monitoring and learning on issues of data interoperability and gender disaggregated data analysis."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1993769116.json b/main/part_2/1993769116.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f586f69904adee6d3219bc91b0189c6059e8b4f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1993769116.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3d5f97dfc9058b4e83fb4fbc804bc2bb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/datafile/:persistentId/?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/QLA5KE/H8VIB4","id":"140335208"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f36f46e9-f9a0-4907-aa4d-5d68f8b9b4db","content":"1. Yes, read and write 2. Yes, read 0. No, cannot read and write A24 Can you read this sentence out loud? (SHOW CARD) 1. Cannot read at all 2. Can read some of it Can read whole sentence MODULE B: EXPOSURE TO PROGRAM SERVICES We would like to ask about your experiences with AWWs, ASHAs, or ANMs during the pregnancy of your wife or your daughter or your daughter in-law No Question Response AWW Response ASHA Response ANM Response code B1. Do you know if there is an …. in your village/ or who visits your village? 1. Yes 0. No B2. Have you ever been at home while the….visited your home? 1. Flipchart/videos for maternal nutrition/ health were shown 2. Received information about importance of and benefits of different food groups that need to be added to pregnant women's diet 3. Received advice to purchase diversenutritious food for pregnant women 4. Received advice to motivate his/ pregnant wife/her daughter/her daughter in-law to consume recommended quantity of diverse nutrient rich food items daily 5. Received information about the role of IFA and Calcium tablets in preventing complications during childbirth 6. Received advice to ensure adequate supply of IFA and calcium tablets at home 7. Received advice to ensure intake of one tablet of IFA daily from 4 th month of pregnancy by his wife/her daughter/daughter-in law 8. Discussed difficulties like nausea, dizziness, side effects of IFA 9. Received advice to ensure intake of 2 tablets of Calcium daily from 4 th month of pregnancy by his wife/her daughter/daughter-in law 10. Received advice on early initiation of breast feeding 11. Received advice on avoiding pre-lacteal (honey, jaggery, ghee or ghutti before breast milk comes in or breastfeeding is established) for the newborn 12. Received advice on exclusive breast feeding for first 6 months after birth 13. Received advice to ensure pregnant women to take rest at least for 2 hours after lunch and sleep for at least 8 hours at night 14. Received advice to make sure that his pregnant wife/her daughter/ her daughter in-lawdoes not do heavy work 15. Received advice to review weight chart and ensure wife's/daugher's/daughter's-in-law weight gain 16. Received advice to call health worker on mobile if wife/daughter/daughter-in law has complications 17. Quizzed on what was shown/told 18. Prize giving ceremony 19. Gavecommitments on commitment sheet 95.Others (specify) 99. Don't knowGood morning/afternoon. I am ________ from Neerman. Together with the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), we are conducting an evaluation of the A&T program in this area. We want to talk with you about your wife/your daughter in-law /your daughters'nutrition and health during pregnancy. The information that you will provide us will be used to set up a good health program in this community and in similar settings in other parts of the world.We are inviting you to be a participant in this study. We value your opinion. You will only be identified through code numbers. Your identity will not be stored with other information we collect about you. Your responses will be assigned a code number, and the list connecting your name with this number will be kept in a locked room and will be destroyed once all the data has been collected and analyzed. Any information we obtain from you during the research will be kept strictly confidential. We will use approximately 40-50 mintues of your time to collect all the information.There will be no cost to you other than your time. Your participation in this research is completely voluntary. You are free to withdraw your consent and discontinue participation in this study at any time. You also have the right to refuse to answer specific questions. There will be no risk as a result of your participating in the study. Two organizations are Jointly doing this survey -International Food Policy Research Institute and Neerman. Your participation will be highly appreciated. The answers you give will help provide better information to policymakers, practitioners and program managers so that they can plan for better services that will respond to your needs.The researcher read to me orally the consent form and explained to me and I agreed to take part in this research. I understand that I am free to discontinue participation at any time if I so choose, and that the investigator will gladly answer any question that arise during the course of the interview. Are you a member of any of the groups?(Multiple response possible) -66None 1. Yes, I am a member of Panchayat 2. Yes, I am a member of VHNSC 3. Yes, I am a member of Reproductive Health Groups 4. Yes, I am a member of Women's/Mother's groups 5. Yes, I am a member of Father's/Husband's groups 6. Yes, I am a member of men's group 7. Yes, I am a member of Self-Help Group 8. Yes, I am a member of Gram Sabha 95. Yes, I am a member of other (specify) C3.Have you participated in or attended any community group meeting in the past three months? Reminds and encourages pregnant wife/daughter/daughter in-law to consume the recommended quantity of diversified foods daily E20.Ensure that there are enough tablets of IFA at home E21.Ensure that there are enough tablets of calcium at home E22.Remind pregnant wife/daughter/daughter in-law to take one tablet of IFA daily E23.Remind pregnant wife/daughter/daughter in-law to take 2 tablets of Calcium daily E24.Remind /helps pregnant wife/daughter/daughter in-law to take rest for 2 hours/day E25.Remind pregnant wife/daughter/daughter in-law to measure weight every time she goes for ANC and record the weight in the MCP card E26.Does not let pregnant wife/daughter/daughter in-law carry out work which includes heavy lifting during pregnancy E27.Accompanies pregnant wife/your daughter/your daughter in-law to health facility for regular ANC check up E28.Call the health worker on mobile if pregnant wife/daughter/daughter in-law has any difficulties related to pregnancy E29.When frontline workers visit pregnant wife/daughter/daughter in-law at your home, join the discussions and attend the counseling session E30.Buy soap for the houseThe following questions are for husbands/Mothers/Mothers-in-law of recently delivered women No Question Response Response code E31.Were you present at the delivery of your wife/daughter/daughter-in-law?1. Yes 0. No E32.Did you do anything to help her breastfeed the baby?1. Yes 0. No  Skip to E34 E33. What did you do regarding feeding/breastfeeding? (Multiple response possible)1. Placed newborn baby on mother's chest in skin to skin contact immediately after delivering baby 2. Cleaned baby's mouth with oil, water etc 1. Helped her and told her to breastfeed the child within 1 hour of birth 2. Did not give and advised her not to give honey, jhanam ghutti, water, cow or goat's milk 3. Showed the right way of positioning and attaching the baby to the breast 4. Helped to place the baby on the breast 95. Others (specify) E34.During the first 3 days after the baby was born, did you feed the baby anything? At what age should an infant first begin eating soft or semi-solid foods?-------------Months (Range: 0-12) F38.Until about what age should a baby continue to be breastfed in addition to eating soft foods?Number of months -99. Do not know (Range: 0-36)"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1994961920.json b/main/part_2/1994961920.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..782fb0456a0ce4ee8ee9a67545e2d40217426796 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1994961920.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2640588534b80a5d3d127d0a2bd0aae2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/832e84d7-920a-439c-81fe-40196d5033ae/content","id":"-1340417802"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4d8c81f9-c483-47d6-b54a-c68167778ca9","content":"Puccinia triticina can be enhanced in wheat (Triticum aestivum ) cultivars through a better knowledge of resistance genes that are present in important cultivars and germplasm. Multi-pathotype tests on 84 wheat cultivars grown in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden during 1992 Á2002 and 39 differential testers enabled the postulation of nine known genes for seedling resistance to leaf rust. Genes Lr1 , Lr2a , Lr3 , Lr10 , Lr13 , Lr14a , Lr17 , Lr23 and Lr26 were found singly or in combination in 47 of the cultivars (55.9%). The most frequently occurring genes in cultivars grown in Sweden were Lr13 (20.4%), Lr14a (14.8%) and Lr26 (14.8%). Lr14a was the most common gene in cultivars grown in Norway (18.7%), Lr13 in Denmark (35.5%) and Lr10 in Finland (20.0%). Although 28 cultivars (33.3%) exhibited a response pattern that could not be assigned to resistance genes or combinations present in the tester lines, several pathotypes carried virulence and hence these genes or combinations are of limited use. Nine cultivars (10.7%) lacked detectable seedling resistance. One cultivar was resistant to all pathotypes used in the study.Leaf or brown rust, caused by the fungus Puccinia triticina Eriks., is one of the most common diseases of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the world. Yield losses in Mexico can vary from 6.6% in resistant cultivars to 62.7% in susceptible cultivars under high disease pressure (SAYRE et al. 1998). Quality losses due to leaf rust include reduced protein levels and softness equivalent scores (EVERTS et al. 2001). In the North European countries Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, the disease generally appears late in the crop season. Yield losses are rarely severe but can be substantial during years when susceptible cultivars are used, winters are mild and conditions for development of leaf rust continue to be favorable throughout the season (WIIK 1991). In Sweden, yield losses of up to 10% have been noted in field trials (SANDNES and WAERN 1991;WIIK 1991).Genetic resistance is one of the most effective, environmentally sound and economic means of control of diseases on wheat (PINK 2002). Knowledge of the identity and diversity of leaf rust resistance genes in cultivars and commonly used germplasm in breeding programs can improve the efficiency of developing new resistant cultivars. More than 50 resistance genes to leaf rust have been identified in wheat (MCINTOSH et al. 2003(MCINTOSH et al. , 2004)). However, new pathogen races rapidly overcome most race-specific resistance genes. For example in Australia the release of cultivars with single genes for resistance to Puccinia triticina during 1938Á1964 was followed by increased frequencies of pathotypes with matching virulence (PARK et al. 2001). There is a continuous need to identify and incorporate effective resistance genes into cultivars of wheat.The distribution of leaf rust resistance genes has been investigated for cultivars grown in Western and Eastern Europe (BARTOS ˇand VALKOUN 1988;WARZECHA 1992;BROERS and DE HAAN 1994;BARTOS ˇet al. 1996;MESTERHA ´ZY et al. 2000;WINZELER et al. 2000;PARK et al. 2001;SINGH et al. 2001) but only for a few cultivars grown in Northern Europe (BROERS and DE HAAN 1994;WINZELER et al. 2000;HERRERA FOESSEL 2001).The objective of the present study was to investigate the occurrence and distribution of genes for seedling resistance to leaf rust in 84 bread wheat cultivars commonly grown in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden during 1992Á2002. Information on the genetic basis of resistance could contribute to a better understanding of the durability of resistance and facilitate the accumulation of effective resistance genes into cultivars.The host material represents 84 of the most widely cultivated spring and winter wheat cultivars in Denmark (31 cultivars), Finland (25 cultivars), Norway (16 cultivars) and Sweden (54 cultivars) between 1992 and 2002 (Table 1). Cultivars with the highest quantity of certified seed were selected based on figures obtained from the following seed control agencies or plant breeding companies: Plantedirektoratet in Denmark, Statens utsa ¨deskontroll in Sweden, Landbrukstilsynet in Norway and Boreal PB in Finland. Svalo ¨f-Weibull AB in Sweden, Graminor A/S in Norway and Boreal PB in Finland kindly provided seed. Information on pedigrees and year of release was provided by plant breeding companies, The Nordic Gene Bank or obtained from the Wheat Pedigree and Identified Alleles of Genes On Line database (http:// genbank.vurv.cz/wheat/pedigree/).A set of differential tester lines that carry known leaf rust (Lr) resistance genes were also included (Table 2). The tester lines, mostly developed by P.L. Dyck, Agriculture Canada, Winnipeg, Man., Canada, are maintained at CIMMYT (International Wheat and Maize Improvement Center) in Mexico.Twelve Mexican pathotypes of Puccinia triticina were used to evaluate the testers and cultivars. The nomenclature of the pathotypes follows the system of LONG and KOLMER (1989), with two additional supplementary sets (SINGH 1991). The pathotypes used were the following: BBB/BN, BBG/BN, CBJ/QB, CBJ/QL, CCJ/SP, MBJ/SP, MCJ/QM, MCJ/SP, MFB/SP, NCJ/BN, TBD/TM and TCB/TD (Table 3).A set of 6Á8 seeds per cultivar and tester line was used in the test with each pathotype. Ten-day-old seedlings were inoculated by spraying with urediniospores suspended in a light-weight mineral oil (2 Á3 mg ml (1 ). Inoculated plants were placed in a dew chamber overnight at 18 Á208C and then transferred to greenhouse chambers at 18 Á228C. (SINGH and RAJARAM 1991). For pathotype NCJ/BN, avirulent to Lr13 , seedlings of cultivars and tester lines were inoculated after 14 days since expression of Lr13 is known to be clearer when older seedlings are inoculated (SINGH and RAJARAM 1991). Infection types (IT) were recorded 9 to 12 days after inoculation according to the 0 to 4 scale described by STAKMAN et al. (1962) and ROELFS (1984) where 00/no macroscopic symptoms, ; 0/hypersensitive necrotic or chloro-tic flecks, 10/small uredinia surrounded by necrosis, 20/small to medium uredinia often surrounded by necrosis or chlorosis, X 0/random distribution of variable-sized uredinia on single leaf, 3 0/mediumsized uredinia that may be associated with chlorosis, 40/large uredinia without chlorosis, '/ 0/uredinia somewhat larger than normal for the infection type,(/ 0/uredinia somewhat smaller than normal, C 0/more chlorosis than normal, N 0/more than usual degree of necrosis. Discrete infection types on different plants of the same line were separated by a comma (e.g. 4, or 1,3). A range of infection types on a single leaf, not adequately described by X, was recorded using more than one infection type with the predominant infection type listed first (e.g. 3C3, 12 ( ). Infection types 3 and 4 (susceptible host/virulent pathotype) were considered high and 0Á2 were considered low (resistant host/avirulent pathotype).The presence of leaf rust resistance genes in the cultivars was postulated by comparing the high and low infection types displayed by a cultivar with the infection type of known Lr genes in the tester lines. Based on the gene-for-gene concept, lines susceptible to a pathotype cannot have an Lr gene for which the pathotype is avirulent. Lr genes were considered present if the low infection type produced on a cultivar by one or more pathotypes, matched the infection type of the corresponding tester line. If the low infection type produced on a cultivar was lower than the corresponding tester lines, then the cultivar was considered to have one or more unidentified Lr genes (STATLER 1984;MODAWI et al. 1985;MCVEY 1989).The 84 selected cultivars, estimated to be the most commonly grown in Northern Europe 1992Á2002 based on quantities certified seed, are presented in Table 1. Several cultivars were grown in more than one country. A few of the most popular cultivars were not available to the present study: 'Ebi' and 'Lars' in Sweden;'Stakado Abed', 'Sleipner' and 'Hereward' in Denmark;'Folke', 'Portal', 'Kalle', 'Rida', 'Rubin', 'Lars' and 'Skjaldar' in Norway;'Ramiro' and'Gunbo' in Finland. According to literature, 'Sleipner' carries Lr26 (MCINTOSH et al. 1995) and'Hereward' has Lr13 (GOYEAU andPARK 1997).The infection types produced on the tester lines with known Lr genes after inoculation with twelve Mexican leaf rust pathotypes are presented in Table 2. The low infection types of the tester lines were in accordance with low infection types reported by MCINTOSH et al. (1995). The presence of genes Lr3ka , Lr9, Lr14b, Lr16 , Lr19, Lr20 , Lr22b, Lr25 , Lr29, Lr30, Lr34, Table 1. Cultivars grown in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden 1992 Á2002 and postulated genes for seedling resistance after inoculation with twelve pathotypes of Puccinia triticina. Lr36 , Lr37 and LrB could not be determined with the twelve pathotypes used in the study because all were avirulent or virulent to these genes.The results of the gene-postulations for different cultivars are presented in Table 1. A summary of the identified and unidentified genes in the material is presented in Table 4. Comparisons of infection types displayed by the cultivars and tester lines allowed the postulation of nine known leaf rust genes in the material: Lr1 , Lr2a, Lr3 , Lr10 , Lr13, Lr14a , Lr17 , Lr23 and Lr26 . Of the 84 cultivars tested, 9 had no detectable seedling resistance; 47 lines had one or more known Lr genes including 26 cultivars that had one or more known Lr genes and one or more unidentified Lr genes. The infection types of the 28 cultivars exhibiting only a response pattern not corresponding to the tester lines and postulated to carry only unidentified Lr genes are presented in Table 5. Eleven different combinations of known and unknown Lr genes were detected in the material. Ten cultivars were resistant to more than eight pathotypes including one cultivar ('Lavett') that was resistant to all pathotypes used in the study (Table 5).The results for the 54 cultivars commonly grown in Sweden 1992Á2002 are presented in Tables 1 and 4. The cultivar 'Kosack' (u ) was released in 1984 and has dominated the seed market to the present day. The winter wheat cultivars 'Ritmo' (Lr13'/u ), 'Stava' (u ), 'Tarso (Lr26'/u), 'Kris' (Lr10'/Lr13'/u ), 'Meridien' (Lr13'/u), 'Urban' (none ), 'Bill' (Lr3'/Lr17'/Lr23'/ u), 'Ebi' and 'Lars' and spring wheat cultivars 'Dragon' (Lr14a'/u ), 'Curry' (Lr14a'/u ) and 'Vinjett' (Lr14a) were the most extensively grown during 1992Á2002 estimated from quantities certified seed The results for the 31 cultivars commonly grown in Denmark are presented in Tables 1 and 4. Wheat is mainly of winter type in Denmark and there is a rapid change in cultivar distribution. The two most commonly grown cultivars typically account for more than 50% of the area under cultivation e.g. 'Ritmo' was grown on more than 50% of the wheat area 1998and 1999(HOVMØLLER 2001)). 'Pepital' (Lr10'/Lr13 ), 'Haven' (Lr26'/u), 'Hussar' (Lr26'/u ), 'Ritmo' (Lr13'/u), 'Lynx' (Lr17'/Lr26'/u ), 'Kris' (Lr10'/Lr13'/u ), 'Terra' (Lr13), 'Sleipner' and 'Hereward' have been the most common winter wheat cultivars during 1992 Á2002. 'Dragon' (Lr14a'/ u), 'Leguan' (Lr14a'/u ) and 'Vinjett' (Lr14a) have been the most popular spring wheat cultivars (PLANTEDIREKTORATET 1992Á2002). The infection response patterns of the selected cultivars and tester lines enabled postulation of Lr genes in 83.9% of the material while a total of 77.4% displayed a resistance response not matching the testers. Lr13 occurred in 35.5%; Lr26 in 29.0%; Lr14a in 16.1%; Lr10 and Lr17 in 9.7%; Lr3 in 6.4% and Lr23 in 3.2% of the material.The results for the 16 cultivars commonly grown in Norway are presented in Tables 1 and 4. Cultivars 'Avle' (Lr14a), 'Zebra' (Lr14a ), 'Bjarne' (Lr1), 'Tjalve' (none ), 'Bastian' (none ), 'Polkka' (u ), 'Mjølner' (Lr10'/u), 'Terra' (Lr13 ), 'Bjørke' (u ), 'Magnifik' (Lr1 ) and 'Folke' have been the most commonly grown during 1992Á2002 (A ˚SSVEEN et al. 2003). Of the 16 cultivars grown in Norway, 50.0% contained one or more of genes Lr14a (18.7%), Lr1 (12.5%); Lr10 , Lr13 or Lr26 (6.2%) while 37.5% had an infection type pattern not matching the tester lines and 12.5% were susceptible.The results for the 25 selected cultivars grown in Finland are presented in Tables 1 and 4. In Finland, the cultivars 'Tjalve' (none ), 'Mahti' (Lr10), 'Vinjett' (Lr14a), 'Kruunu' (Lr10 ), 'Bastian' (none ), 'Zebra' (Lr14a), 'Manu' (u ) and 'Anniina' (u) have dominated the spring wheat market. The most common winter wheat cultivars during 1992Á2002 were 'Tryggve' (u ), 'Urho' (u ), 'Tarso' (Lr26'/u ), 'Aura' (u ), 'Ilves' (none ), 'Gunbo' and 'Ramiro' (M. Jalli, pers. comm). Gene-postulation showed the presence of Lr10 (20.0%); Lr14a (8.0%) and Lr26 (4.0%) in 32.0% of the material while 48% displayed only a resistance reaction different from that of the tester lines and 20.0% were susceptible to all twelve leaf rust pathotypes.The results of the present study showed that infection types corresponding to nine known and several unidentified Lr resistance genes, either singly or in combination, conditioned race-specific seedling resistance in 75 of the 84 investigated wheat cultivars commonly grown in Northern Europe between 1992 and 2002. Genes masked by gene suppression, not expressed in the seedling stage or under the given environmental conditions could remain undetected Table 3. Avirulence/virulence formulae for leaf rust genes based on seedling reactions for 12Puccinia triticina pathotypes used in the study 1 .Virulence to Lr genes BBB/ BN 1,1c,2a,2b,2c,3,3bg,11,13,14a,15,17,18,21,24,26,27'/31 10,22a,23,28 BBG/BN 1,1c,2a,2b,2c,3,3bg,11,13,14a,15,17,18,21,24,26,27'/31,28 10,22a,23 CBJ/QB 1,1c,2a,2b,2c,10,15,18,21,23,24,26,27'/31,28 3,3bg,11,13,14a,17,22a CBJ/QL 1,2a,2b,2c,15,18,21,23,24,26,27'/31,28 3,3bg,10,11,13,14a,17,22a CCJ/SP 1,1c,2a,2b,2c,18,21,24,28 3,3bg,10,11,13,14a,15,17,18,22a,23,26,27'/31 MFB/SP 2a,2b,2c,11,17,18,21 1,3,3bg,10,13,14a,15,22a,23,24,26,27'/31,28 TBD/TM 1c,11,21,23,24,26 1,2a,2b,2c,3,3bg,10,13,14a,15,17,18,22a,27'/31,28 TCB/TD 1c,10,11,17,21,24,27'/31,29 1,2a,2b,2c,3,3bg,13,14a,15,18,22a,23,26,28 MCJ/QM 1c,2a,2b,2c,15,18,21,23,24,28 1,3,3bg,10,11,13,14a,17,22a,26,27'/31 MCJ/SP 1c,2a,2b,2c,21,24,28 1,3,3bg,10,11,13,14a,15,17,18,22a,23,26,27'/31 MBJ/SP 1c,2a,2b,2c,21,24,26,28 1,3,3bg,10,11,13,14a,15,17,18,22a,23,27'/31 NCJ/BN 2a,2b,3,3bg,10,13,15,18,22a,24,27'/31 1,2c,10,11,14a,17,21,23,26,28 1 All pathotypes were avirulent in seedling stage for genes Lr3ka , Lr9 , Lr16 , Lr19 , Lr25 , Lr29 , Lr30 , Lr36 ; and were virulent for genes Lr14b, Lr20 , Lr22b, Lr34 , Lr37 , LrB. but may still have an effect on the disease resistance in the field. Genes Lr13 , Lr26 , Lr14a and Lr10 were postulated in more than 10% of the material followed by Lr1 , Lr17 , Lr3, Lr23 and Lr2a. Twenty-eight cultivars displayed infection type patterns that could not be attributed to known Lr genes in the tester lines. Lines with identical infection types to the same pathotypes may or may not have the same unidentified Lr gene(s). The unidentified genes could be known Lr genes that could not be postulated with the leaf rust pathotypes in the present study, adult-plant resistance genes that are expressed slightly in the seedling stage, undescribed Lr genes or alleles of known Lr genes. Inclusion of additional testers, pathotypes and adult plant tests would possibly have allowed some of these Lr genes to be identified.In order to understand the usefulness of the genes postulated in the material grown in Northern Europe, it is necessary to compare the presence of postulated Lr genes with virulence data for Puccinia triticina populations. Pathogenicity surveys carried out in Sweden in 1957 (GUSTAVSSON 1958), 1958 (BJO ¨RKMAN 1959), 1959 (LEIJERSTAM 1960) and 1960 (HERMANSEN 1962) showed five predominating pathotypes often occurring in mixtures. However, the virulence composition of the pathotypes was difficult to determine due to the method of analysis. In the absence of recent virulence data, virulence surveys in neighboring countries and comparisons of the results from the present study with annual disease severity ratings of leaf rust in Sweden and Norway may indicate presence of virulence to the postulated genes in the material grown in Northern Europe.Surveys in Western and Central Europe 1996 Á1999 have shown that countries have few pathotypes in common, indicating a great genetic diversity within the pathogen (MESTERHA ´ZY et al. 2000). Virulence surveys in Western Europe 1995 (PARK and FELSENSTEIN 1998) detected 53 pathotypes, including 4 predominating pathotypes with virulence to Lr3, Lr10 , Lr17b and Lr26. Based on these surveys, cultivars with Lr9 , Lr12 , Lr19 , Lr22a , Lr24 , Lr25 , Lr28 , Lr29 , Lr34 , Lr35 and Lr37 should provide some protection against leaf rust also in Northern Europe, particularly if combined with other efficient resistance genes.The gene Lr13 was the most common resistance gene that could be postulated in the material and is probably the most widely distributed Lr gene in the world (MCINTOSH et al. 1995). WINZELER et al. (2000) found that 58% of the European wheat genotypes tested carried Lr13 alone or in combination. The gene was once considered to confer durable adult plant resistance (SINGH et al. 2001) but is now ineffective in several countries including Mexico (SINGH 1991). Lr13 is still considered effective in combinations with other race-specific genes in Australia as the Lr13 -virulent pathotype was avirulent on many other resistance genes (SINGH et al. 2001). However, in Mexico, pathotypes contain virulence to Lr13 in combination with virulence on several important resistance genes (SINGH 1991) and many cultivars that carry Lr13 alone or in combination with other genes were susceptible in field trials (SINGH and RAJARAM 1991). In Europe 1996Á 1999, virulence to cultivars with Lr13 varied with genotype suggesting that either the frequency of virulence to Lr13 varied across Europe or that additional genes are present in cultivars displaying higher field resistance (WINZELER et al. 2000). In North America, cultivar 'Era' with Lr10 , Lr13 and Lr34 has remained highly resistant to moderately resistant since the 1970s (OELKE and KOLMER 2004). Effective resistance in the North American cultivars 'Alsen' and 'Norm' were found to be due to the interaction of Lr13 and Lr23 , with Lr34; and Lr13, Lr16 , Lr23 with Lr34 (OELKE and KOLMER 2005).In the present study, Lr13 was found together with Lr10 , Lr26 and/or unidentified genes. According to annual surveys of disease severity in Sweden, cultivar 'Revelj' (Lr13'/u ) had an average of 25% diseased leaf area 1997Á2001 (LARSSON et al. 2002) indicating that Lr13 and the unidentified gene(s) have been overcome in Sweden. Diseased leaf area for 'Ritmo', 'Konsul' and 'Pagode' was 1% 1993Á1997 (LARSSON et al. 1997);'Meridien' 5% and 'Residence' 4% 1997Á 2001(LARSSON et al. 2002); 'SW Harnesk' 5% 1998Á 2002(LARSSON et al. 2003) and 'Trintella' 4% leaf rust 1995Á1999 (LARSSON et al. 2000). It is thus likely that these cultivars contain additional resistance genes more effective than those of 'Revelj'. 'Kris' (Lr10'/Lr13'/u) had 2% diseased leaf area 1998Á2002 (LARSSON et al. 2003) while 'Pepital' (Lr10'/Lr13 ) had 1% diseased leaf area 1993Á1997 (LARSSON et al. 1997). Although disease severity varies between years and cultivars, it seems that virulence exists to Lr13 and the combinations of Lr13 with Lr10 and unidentified genes in northern Europe.The resistance gene Lr26 is present on the rye segment in a T1BL.1RS wheat-rye translocation. The translocation was spread mainly through wheat derivatives produced in Germany during the 1930s (RABINOVICH 1998). In the present study, cultivars 'Brigadier', 'Florida', 'Haven', 'Hussar', 'Marabu', 'Rialto', 'Tjelvar', 'Tarso' and 'Toronto' showed infection types corresponding to Lr26 and carry Hereditas 143 (2006) the T1BL.1RS translocation (SCHLEGEL et al. 1994;KAZMAN and LEIN 1996). The cultivars 'Kamerat' and 'Marshal' also displayed Lr26 , most likely derived from 'Disponent' and 'Brigadier' in the pedigrees. Pathotypes virulent to Lr26 exist in most areas (MCINTOSH et al. 1995). In annual disease surveys in Sweden, cultivars 'Florida' (Lr26) had an average of 3% leaf rust 1986 Á1995 (LARSSON and MAGNE ´T 1995); 'Tjelvar' (Lr26) 3% 19833% Á1992 (CARLSSON et al. 1992)); 'Toronto' (Lr26 ) and 'Tarso' (Lr26'/u) 5%, 'Haven' (Lr26'/u) 1% and 'Hussar' (Lr26'/u) 2% infected leaf area 1993Á1997 (LARSSON et al. 1997) and 'Marshal' (Lr26'/u ) showed 3% 1998Á2002 (LARSSON et al. 2003). It is thus clear that virulence to Lr26 and combinations with unidentified genes exists in Northern Europe.The gene Lr14a originates from Triticum dicoccum (MCINTOSH et al. 1995). The cultivar 'Canon', displaying Lr14a , is the likely donor of this gene to 'Curry', 'Avle', 'Zebra' and 'Vinjett'. Seedling tests with 20 Australian leaf rust pathotypes have shown Lr20 in 'Canon' but not Lr14a (SINGH et al. 2001). Lr20 could not be detected with the pathotypes used in the present study because all were virulent to this gene. Expression of Lr14a can be variable and difficult to interpret due to host genetic background, virulent pathotypes, epistatic genes or intermediate infection types. The gene Lr14a is linked to powdery mildew resistance gene Pm5 (MCINTOSH et al. 1995). Adult plant studies and powdery mildew tests may yield additional information on the presence or absence of Lr14a and Lr20 in 'Canon' used in the present study. The difference could also be due to heterogeneity in the material. Annual disease surveys in Sweden have shown 11% diseased leaf area on 'Curry', 8% on 'Dragon' and 3% on 'Vinjett' 1998Á2002 (LARSSON et al. 2003);16% on 'Drabant' 1985Á1992 (CARLSSON et al. 1992);1% on 'Nova' 1993Á1997 (LARSSON et al. 1997) and 10% leaf rust on 'Zebra ' 2000' Á2001 (LARSSON et al. 2002)). This indicates that 'Vinjett' and 'Nova' may have additional adult plant and/or additive minor genes that may have contributed to resistance in the field compared to 'Curry' and 'Dragon'. In a province of Norway in 2002, the cultivar 'Zebra' had 50% diseased leaf area, ' Avle' around 20% and 'Vinjett' about 15% (ABRAHAMSEN et al. 2003). This indicates that resistance gene Lr14a has been overcome in Sweden and this region in Norway. These cultivars have been widely used in Northern Europe and it is likely that Lr14a has been overcome also in other areas.Resistance gene Lr10 originates from bread wheat and may have some effect in combinations with other genes in parts of the world (MCINTOSH et al. 1995).Lr10 occurred singly or with unidentified gene(s) in the Finnish cultivars 'Ruso', 'Kruunu', 'Mahti', 'Heta' and 'Tapio'. The source was not apparent from the pedigrees. No information regarding virulence to leaf rust in Finland could be obtained for the present study. In Sweden, annual disease surveys showed 4% diseased leaf area on 'Grommit' and 2% on 'Kris' 1998Á2002 (LARSSON et al. 2003) compared to 1% on 'Pepital' 1993Á1997 (LARSSON et al. 1997) that all have Lr10 in combination with other Lr genes. Virulence to Lr10 thus seems to be present in Northern Europe.The genes Lr1 , Lr2a , Lr3, Lr17 and Lr23 occurred in less than 5% of the material. Annual disease surveys in Sweden have shown 3% leaf rust on 'SW Gnejs' (Lr1 ) 1998Á2002; 4% leaf rust on 'SW Vals' (Lr2a'/ u); 4% on 'Grommit' (Lr3'/Lr10'/Lr17'/u) and 3% on 'Bill' (Lr3'/Lr17'/Lr23'/u) 1998 Á2002 (LARSSON et al. 2003). It seems likely that the low incidence of leaf rust on these cultivars could be due to combinations of effective Lr genes and adult plant genes and/ or additive minor genes.Several cultivars displayed infection type patterns that did not correspond to known Lr genes in the tester lines. In the present material, similar infection types not corresponding to the tester lines were found in 'Hussar', 'Kris', 'Lynx', 'Marshal' and 'Brigadier'. It is possible that these cultivars contain Lr37 , supported by the presence of 'Rendezvous' in their pedigrees, in addition to unidentified seedling resistance genes. 'Rendezvous' was selected for resistance to eye spot disease and stripe rust from VPM1 and inherited gene Lr37 from Triticum ventricosum (MCINTOSH et al. 1995). Gene Lr37 confers mainly adult plant resistance and is difficult to detect in seedling tests. Adult plant tests of 'Hussar', 'Kris', 'Lynx', 'Marshal' and 'Brigadier' could confirm the presence or absence of Lr37 . SINGH et al. (2001) postulated Lr37 in 'Hussar', 'Lynx' and'Brigadier'. WINZELER et al. (2000) reported that two cultivars that seemed to carry Lr37 singly, provided low seedling resistance and full adult plant resistance in western Europe in 1996Á1999. Differential tester lines with Lr37 have shown variable levels of moderate susceptibility to resistance to leaf rust in field trials in Romania, Hungary, Czech Republic, Great Britain and Poland 1998 Á1999. Virulence to Lr37 varied between locations although the gene was identified as the most effective of the resistance genes currently used in European wheat cultivars (MESTERHAZY et al. 2000). In Sweden, annual disease surveys showed 2% diseased leaf area on 'Hussar' 1993Á1997 (LARSSON et al. 1997) and 4% on 'Kris' and 'Marshal' 1995Á1999 (LARSSON et al. 2000). If these cultivars carry Lr37 , it appears that virulence exists in Northern Europe to Lr37 in these cultivars. 'Brigadier' had 0% leaf rust during 1993Á1997 (LARSSON et al. 1997). It is probable that this cultivar has additional Lr resistance genes and/or additive minor genes that are effective in Sweden.The cultivar 'Kosack' displayed resistance to four pathotypes used in this study but the results did not correspond to any known Lr genes in the tester lines. According to the pedigree, the line Mironovskaya 808 contains Lr3a (MCINTOSH et al. 1995) but this does not appear to have been transferred to 'Kosack'. The source of the resistance remains unknown. The unidentified resistance in the Finnish cultivar 'Vakka' is the likely origin of the resistance pattern displayed by 'Aura', 'Otso', 'Pitko' and 'Urho' that contain 'Vakka' directly or indirectly in their pedigrees. The Finnish cultivars 'Laari' and 'Luja' also displayed infection types similar to 'Vakka' although this cultivar is not included in their pedigrees and the source of resistance is unknown. The resistance in 'Anniina' to pathotype CBJ/QL was most likely inherited from 'Polkka'. The source of resistance in 'Polkka', 'Runar' and many other cultivars could not be deduced from their pedigrees. In Sweden, annual disease surveys detected 11% leaf rust on 'Kosack' 1995Á1999 (LARSSON et al. 2000); 4% on 'Ballad' 1996Á2000 (LARSSON et al. 2001);4% on 'Dirigent' and 5% on 'Hurtig' 1998Á2002 (LARSSON et al. 2002);9% on 'Flair' 1995Á1999 (LARSSON et al. 2000); 8% on 'Rental' 1985Á1994 (LARSSON et al. 1994); 9% on 'Sport' and 7% on 'Tryggve' 1983Á1992 (CARLSSON et al. 1992); 16% on 'Kadett' 1985 Á1991 (BENGTSSON et al. 1991); 10% on 'Kartesch' 1998 Á2002 (LARSSON et al. 2003); 10% on 'Stava' 1992 Á1996 (LARSSON and MAGNE ´T 1996) and 11% on 'Triso' 1998Á2002 (LARSSON et al. 2003). Virulence seems to exist to the unidentified seedling resistance genes in these cultivars though some genes may be more effective than others, singly or in combination with adult plant or additive minor genes. It is difficult to estimate the virulence on genes that only occur in combinations and further field studies including cultivars or lines with single Lr genes are needed to assess the effectiveness of such genes in the present material.In the material grown in Northern Europe, a total of 9 cultivars were found without seedling resistance to the twelve leaf rust pathotypes used in the study. WINZELER et al. (2000) found that 55% of European wheat cultivars had adult plant resistance, contributed to by quantitative trait loci (QTL) and/or Lr34 that enhances resistance. In Sweden, diseased leaf area was 3% on 'Urban ' 1993' Á1997 (LARSSON et al. 1997););8% on 'Virke' 1998Á2002 (LARSSON et al. 2003);2% on 'Thasos' 1992Á1996 (LARSSON and MAGNE ´T 1996) and 6% on 'Dacke' 1995Á1999 (LARSSON et al. 2000). Although a completely susceptible tester line was not included in the annual disease surveys, the percentage leaf rust on these cultivars is low compared to for example 16% on 'Drabant' with Lr14a (CARLSSON et al. 1992). Thus, these cultivars with no postulated Lr seedling resistance genes may have additional adult plant resistance or additive minor genes that contribute to low disease pressure in the field and may be interesting for further analysis and use in breeding for leaf rust resistance.The results of the present study and annual disease surveys in Sweden and Norway indicate that virulence exists to most of the known and unidentified seedling Lr genes in the cultivars grown in Northern Europe 1992Á2002. Variation in virulence is determined by the genotypes of the pathoypes that were originally introduced to a region; over-wintering infected host plants; migration of urediniospores between regions; sexual recombination, mutation and selection pressure by host resistance genes in the region (KOLMER and LIU 2000). The viability of leaf rust urediniospores has been reported to be 1 Á5% after 24 h exposure to temperatures of (/4 to (/68C (EVERSMEYER and KRAMER 1995). Although information on the virulence and genetic diversity of Puccinia triticina populations in northern Europe is at present limited, the pathogen is likely restricted by sub-freezing winter temperatures and the absence of the principal alternate host, Thalictrum speciosissimum (ANIKSTER et al. 1997). The epidemiology of leaf rust populations in northern Europe would largely be influenced by migrating spores from neighboring areas and the presence and distribution of resistance genes in the wheat host.Comparative studies of resistance genes in the wheat host and pathogenicity surveys have illustrated the effects of host selection pressure on the Puccinia triticina pathogen population. In regions of Canada, virulence frequencies in leaf rust collections changed almost annually from 1987 Á1997 because of the introduction of Lr genes in winter wheat cultivars grown in the United States (KOLMER 1999). Pathotypes with virulence to Lr17 increased in a region of Canada from 1996 Á1998 due to extensive cultivation of one susceptible wheat cultivar with Lr17 in Kansas (KOLMER 2001). In the US and Canada, pathotypes with virulence to Lr16 declined in the late 1980s following decreased cultivation of winter wheat with this gene (KOLMER 1999). In Israel, where cultivars with Lr26 are absent, pathotypes with virulence to Lr26 have increased due to annual migration of spores from other regions (KOZMAN et al. 2004). However, Hereditas 143 (2006) studies on leaf rust in former Czechoslovakia since the 1960s concluded that changes of virulence in Puccinia triticina could only partially be ascribed to changes of resistance genes in wheat cultivars (BARTOS ˇet al. 1996).The results of the present investigation show that several known and unidentified leaf rust seedling resistance genes have been deployed in Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark during 1992Á2002 that could have contributed toward host selection on the leaf rust pathogen in the field. The breakdown of the resistance genes present in the material grown in Northern Europe was most likely influenced by the cultivation of a few cultivars on extensive areas. However, information on quantities certified seed was only available as total figures for countries per year and disease severity was available as average percentage diseased leaf area for several years. Area under cultivation and disease severity of a certain cultivar may vary with region and year and from the present information it is thus not possible to conclude how Lr genes in wheat hosts may have affected disease severity patterns in Northern Europe. Additional data on disease severity, virulence surveys and adult plant tests in the region are needed to provide evidence of interactions between the Puccinia triticina pathogen and Lr genes present in the wheat host.Pyramiding genes, i.e. accumulating several effective resistance genes in the same cultivar, has been suggested as a method to achieve more durable resistance against pathogens with low genetic diversity, high gene flow and an asexual mating system (MESTERHA ´ZY et al. 2000; MCDONALD and LINDE 2002). The combination of several effective (undefeated) resistance genes into a single cultivar should extend the period of resistance since mutations at several avirulence loci would be required to produce a new virulent pathotype (PINK 2002). Molecular markers that could facilitate gene pyramiding have been developed for several effective resistance genes, including Lr9, Lr19 , Lr24 , Lr25 , Lr35, Lr37 and Lr52 (HELGUERA et al. 2003;BLASZCZYK et al. 2004;HIEBERT et al. 2005). Slow-rusting or partial resistance has been reported to be a more durable type of resistance than single seedling resistance genes (SINGH et al. 2001). Cultivars with a combination of the adult plant resistance gene Lr34 and 3Á4 additive partially effective genes have been shown to confer high levels of nonspecific resistance in many areas of the world (SINGH et al. 2000;NAVABI et al. 2005). Quantitative trait loci (QTL) for partial resistance to leaf rust have been identified in several wheat genotypes (MESSMER et al. 2000;XU et al. 2005) that could be used to develop markers necessary for breeding programs.Future host selection pressure on the pathogen could be further decreased by rotating genes through time and space by mixtures or regional deployment of cultivars with different effective resistance genes (MCDONALD and LINDE 2002;PINK 2002). The knowledge of presence of leaf rust seedling resistance genes facilitates future studies and use of adult plant resistance and additive minor genes in these cultivars. A few cultivars have dominated the market and annual disease surveys have shown that many of the most commonly grown cultivars in Northern Europe during 1992Á2002 are susceptible to leaf rust (LARSSON et al. 1994Á2003;ABRAHAMSEN et al. 2003). It is thus important to continue breeding for leaf rust resistance and monitor the pathogen as part of a management control strategy."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/1999158255.json b/main/part_2/1999158255.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..551dff5457bf2161246c8296440d9701b4928167 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/1999158255.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f720f846681ec48a9a28342afe85d6d1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e14807e3-f186-4839-a48c-4d5d3e56658e/retrieve","id":"2144476921"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"be4a9645-046c-4a9f-9a4e-a75c3617ab8f","content":"Antenatal Care ASP A ccording to the Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS 2016), 33% of the Ugandan population was malnourished in 2016, 29% percent of children under 5 were stunted, 11% were underweight, 3.6% were wasted, 11.8% had low birth weight. Prevalence of anemia among women of child bearing age was at 31.8%. The current levels of malnutrition in Uganda are unacceptable. In Acholi region, 31% of children below 5 years of age are stunted, 4% are wasted and 15% are under weight. In Central region, 19% of children under 5 years are stunted, 4% are wasted and 7% are underweight. Therefore, nutrition warrants greater investment and commitment for Uganda to realize its full development potential.Among the main contributors of malnutrition is the low awareness of the available options and in some instances -the poverty levels within certain regions that limits households from accessing enough food or providing the appropriate health care.It is upon this background that the Government of Uganda with the support from the International Fund for Agricultural Development funded two projects in Kalangala region and northern Uganda. The objectives of the projects were to improve households' income by increasing productivity of farmers through adoption of commercial farming.The VODPII project in Kalangala was to achieve its objective through promoting commercial production of oil palm thus increasing household incomes. In northern Uganda, PRELNOR aimed at increasing production of food crops especially maize, beans, cassava and rice…so that farmers have excess surplus to sell.In 2003 the Government of Uganda, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), BIDCO and individual farmers in Kalangala under Kalangala Oil Palm Growers Trust (KOPGT) teamed up to establish an oil palm project with expertise from Malaysia, the pilot was rolled out on Bugala Island with plans to expand the project to other neighbouring islands in the district.The project was designed to improve the livelihood of the people of Uganda and Kalangala in particular, more so on the nutrition status of the poor and reduction on the national cost burden of importation of vegetable oils. situation Nutrition in Uganda PRELNOR Although only 20% of the Uganda population lives in Northern Uganda, it accounts for 38% of the poor in Uganda with 26% of all the chronically poor living in the area. IFAD included Northern Uganda, particularly the Acholi region, as a high priority in the IFAD project pipeline.Most farmers returning from the IDP camps rely on the natural fertility of the soils, with minimal or no inputs leading to low yields and productivity. The sub-region has excellent potential for agricultural development, which is needed for lifting the rural poor out of poverty.The PRELNOR project aims to achieve increased incomes through; adoption of improved farming practices, improving market processes and structures and providing climate specific information to enable improved farming. This Guide is therefore designed for use by field level staff. The guide gives details that are aimed at enabling the field service providers within PRELNOR and VODP II projects to gain an understanding major concepts in nutrition, identifying nutrition needs for different categories of people, identifying different forms of malnutrition, their causes, consequences, management and preventive strategies. Nutrition indicators and their measurement and monitoring methods are also included. Finally, information on food safety and hygiene is also given. The target trainees include: field level staff (Community based facilitators, Household Mentors and Unit leaders) following the trainings, the field extension service providers will have gained knowledge and skills that can be transferred to communities and household members in projects' target regions.This training guide is intended to build capacity of community level resource persons to transfer knowledge on basic concepts regarding appropriate dietery patterns and use of existing farming systems for better household nutrition.In reffering to this manual,the community resource persons will be able to draft action action plans to transfer the information gained to community members.The expected impact is that enhanced knowledge of the links between agriculture,nutrition and health,formation and/or upgrading of existing home gardens into comprehensive gardens as well as proper dietary and health practices will eventually lead to enhanced nutrition and health status.• Number of extension field workers trained and able to train their community members, number of households reached with the intervention,• Number of households trained by extension field workers that can implement the recommended practicesThis guide it to be used in creating awareness of the service providers with regards to nutrition to enable mainstreaming of nutrition into PRELNOR & VODP II projects. It will be used for training Field level implementers.The guide has 7 Main sections:1. Basic Concepts in Nutrition 2. Ensuring household and individual balanced diet 3. Malnutrition, its forms and causes 4. Food and nutrition assessment 5. Food safety and hygiene 6. Utilization of income for food and nutrition securityEach section includes a time allocation, a pre-test, an overview of the learning objectives, materials needed, notes and facilitator fact sheets pertaining to the section. Also contained is an activity that generates discussion and helps in recapping information while focusing on the key learning objectives.Materials needed: Flip charts, Markers Pens and note booksWelcome participants and thank them for participating in the training.Participants introduce themselves: their name, role and expectation of the trainingThe objectives of the training are:1. To equip frontline service providers with the knowledge and skills on nutrition, appropriate dietary patterns and practices for better household nutrition, food security and health 2. Enable frontline service providers to transfer the knowledge and skills to household beneficiaries in the project areas and community membersThe facilitators take the participants through a summary of the program. Activity: (using a flip chart, ask at least three participants their understanding of the concepts below, What is good nutrition?What are some of the common nutrient groups?What are some local food sources of the common nutrient groups?What is the function or use of these nutrient groups?After the participants provide the responses the facilitator moves forward to provide the right definition and details as provided in the session technical notes and ensuring there is great participation and discussion during the process and welcoming questions and making clarifications.Food is any nutritious substance that people eat or drink and provides them with nutrients to maintain life and growthAt the beginning of the session the facilitator is expected to understand the entry level knowledge of participants regarding the session content.At the end of this session participants are expected to:• Briefly describe what good nutrition is.• List at least six nutrients found in food and their function.• List at least five local sources of carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins and minerals.Training manual For Field Extension service providers | 11A nutrient is a substance that provides nourishment essential for the maintenance of life and for growthMacronutrients are nutrients that are needed in large quantities in our bodies. They include; carbohydrates and proteinsVitamins and minerals are called 'micronutrients' as they are only needed in small amounts by the body Whether or not a food is a good source of a nutrient depends on:• The amount of nutrient in the food. Foods that contain large amounts of micronutrients compared to their energy content are called 'nutrient-rich' (or sometimes 'nutrient-dense') foods. They are preferred because they help ensure that the diet provides all nutrients needed.• The amount of the food that is eaten usually.• How readily available the nutrient in the food we eat is for absorption and use by the body.Nutrition is the science of foods and the nutrients and other substances they contain, and of their actions within the body (including ingestion, digestion, absorption, transport, metabolism, and excretion).Food security is achieved \"when all people at all times have physical, economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food for a healthy and active life\" (IFPRI, 2002).Food security is a measure of the availability of food and individuals' accessibility to it. Food security and insecurity are terms used to describe whether people have access to enough quality and quantity of food.The components of food security are:• Availability of food, or the amount of food that exists (local production and other sources);• People's physical, economic and social access to food (the capacity to produce/buy/acquire food);• Stability of this access over time;• Quality or nutritional adequacy of that food;• People's ability to utilize this food, including the patterns of control over who eats what and the physical ability to absorb and assimilate nutrients At the household level, food security refers to the ability of the household to secure adequate food that meets the dietary needs of all members of the household, either from its own production, through wild-food foraging, food gifts or through purchases.A family is food secure if it has access to enough safe and nutritious food throughout the year for all members to meet their nutrient requirements with foods they need and like/prefer for an active and healthy life.A person is considered nutrition-secure when they have a nutritionally adequate diet and the food consumed is biologically utilized such that adequate performance is maintained in growth, resisting or recovering from disease, pregnancy, lactation, and physical work.• Hunger, Illness• Psychological suffering• To be stressed, socio-familial perturbations, disrupted household dynamics• Modification of eating patterns and ritualsCoping mechanisms to food insecurityThis included consumption of low grades locally available or cheaper foods such as seasonal vegetables, wild fruits etc.This includes limited portion size of one or more household member during mealtimes, reduced numbers of meals eaten in a day, missed eating food for the entire day in situation of extreme food insecurity.Strategies like borrowing food or lending money/ resources from friends or relatives, buying food on credit, use of reserves including money saved by the family for the time of need or food stored by the households to be consumed during the time they cannot afford to buy, and rely on food aid.4. Decreasing number of household members by sending some members or complete family to eat elsewhere and in worst situation, migration of one or more family members 5. Irreversible strategies, households sell items like furniture, jewellery or utensils, borrowing money from the money lenders, part time work along with regular work, non-earning members like women starting to work.At the end of the session, let the facilitator ask whether there are any additional questions or points of clarification. After all clarifications are made (if any), the facilitator closes the session and mentions the next session and its facilitator. At the beginning of the session the facilitator is expected to understand the entry level knowledge and behavior of participants in regard to the session content.At the end of this session participants are expected to:• Know how to plan for a balanced meal • Understand the food pyramid concept when planning and serving meals • Briefly describe the main differences between the food needs for the different family membersEach group then takes 5 minutes to present its results. Following all the 6 presentations, , the facilitator takes 10-15 minutes to go through all the 3 main food groups of focus, provide any clarifications and gives the correct details as per the sessions technical notes. The facilitator should also discuss the following before the end of the session:• Macro and micro nutrients• Fats: functions and sources• Animal and plant protein sources• Water• Key vitamins (iron, calcium, iodine, vitamin A)Session technical notesCarbohydrates provide your body with the fuel it needs to keep running. Depending on how quickly they convert to sugar in the body, they can be simple or complex, carbohydrates are mainly in form of starches, simple sugars or fibre.Starch and simple sugars provide energy needed to keep the body breathing and alive, for movement and warmth, and for growth and repair of tissues.Some starch and simple sugar are changed to body fat as storage of energy.The fibre in carbohydrates makes faces soft and bulky, absorbs harmful chemicals, and helps to keep the gut healthy. It slows digestion and absorption of nutrients in meals and helps to prevent obesity. The fats and oils in foods serve many important functions such as;• Nutrient: Fat supplies essential fatty acids, which are needed for normal growth of infants and children and for production of hormone-like compounds that regulate a wide range of body functions and keep you healthy.• Transport: Fat carries fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, and K) and assists in their absorption.• Sensory: Fat contributes to the smell and taste of food.• Texture: Fat helps make foods tender (especially meats and baked goods).• Satiety: Fat gives food satiety, so you feel full and satisfied longer after a meal.• Fat provides a concentrated source of calories. This is good if you are travelling long distances, expending a lot of energy, and carrying your own food energy.In the body, fat has the following roles:• Fats are the body's main form of stored energy (important in times of illness and diminished food intake).• Fats provide most of the energy to fuel muscular work.• Fat pads internal organs and insulates our bodies against temperature extremes and damage.• Fats form the major material of cell membranes (especially brain and nerve cells).• Fats are converted to many important hormones (including sex hormones).Fat is a good thing! It's only when there is too much of a good thing that it can become problematic. Fat needs are expressed as 'percent of total energy needs'. The percent of total energy that should come from fat in a healthy balanced diet is:• 30-40 percent for children on complementary feeding and up to the age of two years;• 15-30 percent for older children and most adults; for active adults up to 35 percent is acceptable;• At least 20 percent up to 30 percent for women of reproductive age (15-45 years).Consuming more fats beyond what the body needs leads to overweight, and increases the risk of diseases like heart diseases, high blood pressure and diabetes.Proteins are the building blocks for muscles, organs and many of the substances that make up our bodies. They provide essential amino acids that the body uses to make muscle tissue. The body needs proteins and calories every day. Proteins also facilitate the production of enzymes that govern the body's processes such as growth and digestion. When you don't get enough of calories and protein everyday, your body breaks up its own supplies to make up for the lack of energy. This robs your body of the calories it needs to stay healthy leading to weight loss.Protein can be found in both animal and plant foods.i. Animal sources • Meats, poultry, fish, eggs, cheese, milk and yogurt. • Edible insects: Grasshoppers, termites and white ants• These foods are considered \"complete\" or \"high quality\" proteins because they contain all the \"essential\" amino acids. \"Essential\" means that they must be consumed in our diet; our bodies cannot manufacture them.Examples of animal protein source are shown in the figure 3 below. ii. Plant sources • Beans; peas; soy bean and soybean products (like tofu, soy milk); nuts like ground nuts, sim sim and seeds. • There are also small amounts of protein in breads, cereals, and other grains, as well as in vegetables.• Plant sources of protein are considered \"incomplete\" because they are missing one or more essential amino acids. • Soy protein is the one exception--it is considered \"complete.\" • Vitamins help the body turn food into energy and tissues.• There are 13 vitamins in all: vitamin A; the vitamin B complex, which includes thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folic acid, vitamin B12 pantothenic acid, and biotin; and vitamins C, D, E, and K.• Minerals are needed for growth and maintenance of body structures. They also help to maintain digestive juices and the fluids found in and around cells.• Minerals are not made by plants and animals.Plants get minerals from water or soil, and animals get minerals by eating plants or planteating animals.• Vitamins and Minerals are also known as constructive and protective foods; they help to build the immune system thus reducing the occurrence of infections and if they occur the severity is reduced.• Micronutrients that are in shortest supply and cause the most micro-nutrient malnutrition worldwide are: Iodine, zinc, vitamin A, iron and folate. Lack of vitamin A leads to night blindness, lack of iron/folate leads to anaemia, lack of iodine leads to goitre, lack of calcium leads to weak bones and teeth and lack of zinc leads to growth retardation and delayed sexual and bone maturation.• Orange vegetables, such as orange sweet potato and carrots, and orange fruits, such as mango and pawpaw and red palm oil are excellent sources of vitamin A.• Red meat, red offal and liver of all types are a very rich source of iron and vitamin A.• Most citric fruits (oranges, tangerines, pineapples) and fresh (not overcooked) vegetables provide vitamin C.• Dark green leafy vegetables supply folate and some vitamin A.• Many vegetables (e.g., tomatoes, onions) and fruits (bananas, guavas, Jack fruits, apples) provide additional important micronutrients that may protect against some chronic conditions such as heart disease. Examples of vitamins are shown in the figure 5 below.Vitamins and minerals are required in small quantities.• Requirements are based on age, sex and activity level but consumption of a variety of fruits, vegetables and whole grains.• The best way to make sure we get enough of each micronutrient and enough fibre is to eat a variety of vegetables and fruits and whole grains every day.Water just may be the most important nutrient. In fact, the body is more than half water. You can live without food for several weeks, but you can go less than a week without water.The body needs water to function. It is necessary for:• Maintaining body temperature;• Transporting nutrients throughout the body;• Keeping joints moist;• Digesting food;• Ridding the body of waste products.(Think of the use of water when building a house, without the water, the cement, sand and concrete will not be useful.)• Water;• Fruit Juices;• Soup;• Milk;• Porridge;• Non-caffeinated drinks (caffeinated and alcohol beverages contain diuretic substances that cause the body to lose water).Requirements 1.5 liters/day or 8 glasses a day Not drinking enough water leads to constipation, dehydration, dry skin, and build-up of toxins in the body.The food groups above are further divided into categories based on the nutrient content and type of food: Vitamin A-rich foods are those that are:• Orange, red, or dark yellow in colour such as mangoes, pawpaw, carrots, orange-fleshed sweet potato• Dark green leafy vegetables such as Amaranth, Spider Leaf, Spinach, Sukuma Wiki, cassava leaves, bean leaves, sweet potato leaves, pumpkin leavesA balanced diet provides the correct amounts of energy and nutrients needed by the body to maintain health, growth, and development. A balanced diet must be composed of a variety of different foods from different food groups so that it contains all the many macronutrients and micronutrients the person needs in sufficient quantities.A good meal should contain:• A staple food. Look at the list of carbohydrate foods made in the previous session and see if it contains the local staple foods. Add them if necessary.• Other foods that may be made into a sauce, stew or relish. These should include: -Legumes and/or foods from animals -At least one vegetable• Some fat or oil (but not too much) to increase the energy and improve taste and facilitate absorption of some nutrients like fat-soluble vitamins. Most of the fat or oil should be from foods containing unsaturated fatty acids (See sources of fats listed in the previous session).• It is good to eat fruits with a meal (or as a snack) and to drink plenty of water during the day. Avoid drinking tea or coffee until 1-2 hours after a meal (when food will have left the stomach) as these reduce the absorption of iron from food.• Encourage families to use:-Several groups of foods at each meal.-Different vegetables and fruits at different meals because different vegetables and fruits contain varying amounts of the different micro-nutrients. The more colors consumed the better. -Serve meat, poultry, and offal or fish daily if possible because these foods are the best sources of iron and zinc (which are often lacking in diets, especially the diets of young children and women).• Snacks are a good way to ensuring one has a balanced diet. A snack refers to foods eaten between meals. Below are examples of foods that make good snacks -Fresh milk, soured milk, yoghurt, cheese, roasted groundnuts, soybeans, melon seeds, simsim seeds, eggs, fried fish, bread, boiled/ roasted maize cob, boiled or roasted cassava, plantain, yam, sweet potato, bananas, avocado, tomatoes, mangoes, oranges, pawpaw, passion fruits.• Eating snacks like these is a good way of improving a diet which may lack food energy and nutrients. However, frequent eating (snacking) throughout the day increases the risk of tooth decay, particularly where oral hygiene is poor. This is particularly true for artificially sweetened snacks that stick to the teeth. It is better to eat the fruit than make juice as many people discard the fibre in the fruits when making juice.• Format: power point presentation and use of flip charts• Activity: Brainstorming, question and answer as slides are presentedThe facilitator uses a power point presentation of the food pyramid to explain the balanced diet as in the figure below Meat, Poultry, fish, Dry beans and nuts group (2 boiled eggs/cooked fish, meat or chicken / 2 cupped palms of cooked beans)Fruits group (2 medium bananas / 2 medium pieces of pawpaw, mango)Water -(2 litres / 6-8 glasses of fluid per day) This includes the water, juices or soup taken Cereals and grains (6 slices of bread / 2 cupped palms Cooked Ugali, Matoke, Boiled banana / 3 cupped palms cooked Rice / 3 medium pieces of Cassava or Sweetpotatoes)Although food intake varies from meal to meal and from day to day, keeping a balanced view of the diet is a good idea. The food pyramid above is meant to be a guideline not rigid set of rules.• It is healthy to eat more of the foods from the bottom levels of the pyramid and fewer of those from the top. The top of the pyramid is for foods that should be consumed in small quantities because large amounts are not good for the body.• The Food Pyramid as a guide helps to promote the 3 basic rules for a healthy diet:-Variety -Balance -Moderation• Variety means that you must include many different foods from each level of the Food Pyramid because no single food can supply all of the nutrients that your body needs on a daily basis. This can help to expand your food choices. It is best to eat foods of all colours. The more colours and textures in your daily meals, the better range of nutrients you'll get. You can choose to vary different foods in a day or aim to vary different foods across a whole week.• Balance means that you must eat the right amounts of foods from all levels of the Food Pyramid each day. This way you will get all the calories and nutrients you need for proper growth and development.• Moderation means that you are careful not to eat too much of any one type of food.1. Pregnant women 2. Breastfeeding women 3. Children 0-6 months 4. Children 6 months to 2 years 5. Children 2 to 5 years 6. Children above 5 years Each group will take 15 minutes to discuss one category of people listed above, giving details of:I. How should they be fed?II. What foods should they eat to ensure they are healthy?III. What additional care is needed to make sure that they have good diets and are healthy?IV. What myths about food are in our community concerning them?Each group then presents their results (5 minutes per group). Following the presentations, the facilitator makes clarifications and provides details based on the sessions technical notes.To wrap up the topic, the facilitator then goes through the slide presentation of the key nutritional needs for 6 special groups as detailed in the sessions technical notes..The facilitator uses a slide presentation of the key nutritional needs for pregnant women, children 0-6 months and children above 6 months to explain the content below:A pregnant and lactating woman should consume and utilize balanced meals to meet the extra demand for energy and other nutrients (pregnancy, lactation).A woman's nutritional status during pregnancy/ lactation influences the baby's and her own health, poor feeding increases the risk of malnutrition and mortality both for the mother and baby.Message 1: Attend antenatal care All women should attend antenatal clinic immediately they discover they are pregnant--if they have missed two menstrual periods (a sign she is pregnant). They should make at least four visits to the clinic Why should a pregnant woman visit a health centre?• Conduct nutritional assessment during first visit (including dietary history, MUAC, weight, anaemia, iodine, and vitamin A) to detect risks.• Address any identified problems.• Monitor weight throughout the pregnancy and encourage the woman to gain 1 to 1.5 kilograms per month in the second and third trimesters (overweight or obese women should aim to gain 1 kilogram per month in the second and third trimesters).Nutrient needs of different family members The facilitator requests participants to form 5 groups. The facilitator then explains that we are going to look at the nutritional needs of groups of people in our families that require extra attention. The facilitator asks each group to discuss the category of people as below.Message 3: Take iron and folic acid supplements• Requirements for iron are particularly high so pregnant women are often faced with lack of iron (lack of enough blood). This is dangerous to the woman and the baby growing in her. Mothers who have anaemia during pregnancy, if not treated, are at high chance of dying if they lose too much blood during delivery.• Folic acid is important for prevention of neural tube defects in babies during pregnancy• Take one tablet of iron supplements and folic acid every day throughout pregnancy and first 3 months after delivery (unless the healthcare provider tells you otherwise)• Avoid tea or coffee after taking the tablet. There are substances in coffee and tea that reduce the use of iron by the body• Take them at a given time that is easy to remember (e.g. just after dinner)• Place them where you can see them and remember (or carry them when travelling)• If they cause nausea or vomiting, take the tablet with juice (orange or lemon), take it with a meal (or just before food), make sure the tablets are not expired. • A varied and balanced diet is important. A diet with adequate staple foods, and sauces made from vegetables, legumes, meat and fish, and plenty of fruits should be eaten• Eat a lot of vegetables and fruits (they have fibre that reduce constipation)• Drink a lot of fresh [homemade] juices and fluids between meals• Eat fruits (like papaws, mangoes, passion, etc)• Snack foods/small foods like sweet potatoes orange fleshed sweet potato, pumpkins, groundnuts, cassava, banana• If the mother does not satisfy the needs of her baby, the baby will draw on, and reduce, the mother's own stores of nutrients. This puts the mother at increased risk of illness and can affect the baby's development.Message 4: Rest during the day (from work)• Pregnant and lactating women need to rest and reduce on workload (especially in the last three months of pregnant o For hookworm prevention, prescribe a single dose of mebendazole (500 mg) in the second and third trimesters.• Counsel women on preventive measures (improved sanitation and wearing shoes) to reduce intestinal worms and prevent other infections.• Treat infections such as intestinal worms and infections of the urinary and respiratory tracts.• For HIV-positive women, prescribe cotrimoxazole and antretroviral therapy (ART) from time of diagnosis for life Message 6: Deliver from health facility• Make preparations for delivery early, having all necessary items as those in the mama kitMessage 1: Eat a balanced diet• Mother should be given well balanced meals and enough fluids for breastmilk production.• Eat two extra meals a day to maintain the health of the mother and the baby• During breastfeeding, more energy and vitamin A are required compared to during pregnancy• Avoid alcohol and tobacco.Message 2: Breastfeed frequently• Counsel the woman about breastfeeding early enough, right from the first hour after giving birth• Place the baby on to the breast immediately after birth for skin to skin bonding and initiate breastfeeding within 1 hr.• Breastfeed frequently, whenever the infant demands. Encourage breastfeeding at night as well• Encourage the mother to attach and position the baby to the breast properly to avoid any breast conditions like sore nipple, milk stasis and mastitis.Message 3: Ensure good hygiene and sanitation and prevent common illnesses • Breastfeed until the baby removes him/her-self freely from the breast.• Breastfeed whenever the baby is in need of the breast or when you feel like breastfeeding.• Feed the baby day and night (more than 10 times in a day).• Frequent breastfeeding helps milk flow (the more you breastfeed the more the flow) and prevents breast problems.Why is introduction of foods before 6 months not good?• Leads to the baby taking little breast milk; and also the mother may have little milk produced in her breasts• Sometimes there may be chances that the of baby might eat contaminated foods and being infected by disease causing germs During the period of complementary feeding, the young child gradually becomes accustomed to eating family foods but breast feeding should continue as breast milk continues to be an important source of nutrients and protective factors until the child is at least 2 years old. Complementary foods fill the nutrient gaps left by breast milk.The nutrient gaps include; energy, protein, iron, vitamin A and fluid. Therefore, the complementary foods given to the child must be nutritious and adequate in amounts to fill these gaps and help the child to grow and develop well.A good complementary food is one that:-Provides the nutrients a child needs to grow and be healthy-The baby likes it, without being forced -Is easy to prepare. Can be made with other meals e.g. pumpkin can be placed on top of other foods being cooked -Convenient for the care-taker's roles and responsibility e.g. if someone is left to feed the baby they can do it with ease and safely • Fruits and some vegetables can be served in between meal times as snacks• Eating good food means eating a variety of foods. No single food contains all of the nutrients that we need. A variety of foods fed to the baby is likely to supply them with all of the nutrients they need for their bodies to growth, be healthy and function well.• Many children's food has too much starch-based foods and low in animal-source foods and fruits and vegetables---and little variety. Staple foods like pumpkin, rice, potato, bananas and porridge are important because they provide energy. They are important to provide energy. However, babies have small stomachs and they consume little of the foods. Therefore to get the right amount of energy, we need to enrich baby's foods with foods that have more energy like: sugar, honey, oil, groundnut paste• On their own, starchy foods do not provide all of the nutrients that are required for good health and growth. At each meal, or as often as possible, caregivers should try to feed their child a variety of foods from each of the three food groups.• Food variety also adds taste and flavour; the baby can eat more and enjoy the foodDuring preparation, it is important to ensure consistency, and safety of the food Why right consistency?• Babies can't chew. They should be able to swallow the food-without being choked. But it should not be too watery-the water will be feeling the stomach of the baby. There is enough water in the breastmilk. Watery foods do not have enough energy and nutrients for every spoon the baby eats.• Since the stomach of the baby is still small (the size of his/her hand folded), the small food they eat should have enough energy and nutrients to complement the breast milk they are taking• The thickness of the child's food should be increased as the child grows older; making sure that he or she is still able to easily swallow the food without choking.• Grind the food or mash and soften foods so the young child can chew and swallow them. Be careful not to make the child's food too thin. Why safety:• Foods can be the source of infection that cause diarrhoea, worm's infestation, poisoning, and other illnesses that can result to undernutrition, sickness and sometimes death.• For young children meals, use foods that are not spoilt (or expired)-e.g. mouldy, rotten, unpleasant taste or off-smells; or foods that may be unsafe for eating as a result of organic or physical materials, dead insects that may harm the baby• Avoid very bitter foods or foods that are too acidic, too sugary or salty, alcoholic,• Ensure food hygiene; Use clean utensils. Wash your hands with soap and flowing water before preparing food and before feeding the baby. Wash children's hands with soap and flowing water before they eat. Store all food in clean place and covered (from flies, insects, rats, animals)• Reheat/boil all sleep/left over food that is not heat well/enough When the child has healed from sickness and their appetite back, feed the child with enough food to make up for loss during sickness.• Make sure the illness is treated immediately• Continue to breastfeed -often ill children breastfeed more frequently. Breastfeed more during sickness. This will help a sick child to fight sickness, recover more quickly and maintain his or her weight.• Be patient in feeding the baby. Encourage the child to drink and to eat• Give foods that the child likes.• Feed small amounts frequently; it may be easier for a sick child to eat smaller meals.• Give a variety of nutrient-rich foods: like papaw, avocado, traditional vegetables, mukene/silver fish)• Brestfeed the child more frequently and feed more frequently during illness. Fluid and food requirements are higher during illness.Feeding a 6 to 9 months old child• First breastfeed before feeding• The baby's stomach is small (the size of its folded hand)• Feed small amounts of thick puree/porridge at a time (start small amounts and increase to three table spoons per feeding)• Feed three times in day• Breastfeed on demand between meals Feeding a 9 to 12 months old child• First breastfeed then feed• The baby's stomach is small (the size of its folded hand)• Feed amounts of mashed foods at a time (a third to half of a NICE cup or 250mls cup)• Feed three to four times in day• Give a snack of a fruit, vegetable, legume or orange fleshed sweet potatoFeeding 12 months to 24 months old child• First feed and then breastfeed• Feed about a half of a NICE cup/bowel during each meal• Use foods from the family meal-mix them and cut the food into very small pieces or mash if necessary• Feed 3-4 times a day• Give a snack or 2 a day (one must be a fruit)• Breastfeed on demand between mealsMessage 1: Feed a balanced diet• To provide enough energy and nutrients child needs foods that contain the 4 different kinds of foods a) staples/roots/tubers, added with foods rich in energy like sugar and oil, avocado, groundnut paste; b) fruits, c) vegetables, d) animal source foods, or pulses• Feed the child 3-4 times a day, giving a snack in between the main family meals.• Fruits and some vegetables can be served in between meal times as snacks. Other healthy snacks include groundnuts, soy bean, and simsim.Message 2: Ensure good hygiene and sanitation and prevent common illnesses• Ensure good personal hygiene for the mother and child and hygiene in the home Activity 1: Brainstorming, question and answer as slides are presented.The facilitator asks the participants to mention their understanding of the term malnutrition. The responses are noted on a flip chart. The facilitator then gives the right content as detailed in the session technical notes.Malnutrition is the condition that develops when the body does not get the right amount of the nutrients it needs to maintain healthy tissues and organ function.Under nutrition is a deficiency of food energy or nutrients, which leads to nutrient deficiencies. It is caused by inadequate intake or poor absorption of nutrients in the body. Acute malnutrition, chronic malnutrition, stunting, wasting, and underweight and micronutrient deficiencies occur because of undernutrition, and they can have serious consequences on the development and health of infants and young children.Undernutrition is one of the leading causes of mortality for young children across the globe and is often caused by an interaction between inadequate dietary intake and frequent illness.Over nutrition is a condition caused by abnormal or excess fat accumulation in the body that may lead to health problems and reduced life expectancy. Overnutrition starts as overweight and if left uncontrolled may progress to obesity.At the beginning of the session the facilitator is expected to understand the entry level knowledge of participants in regard to the session content.At the end of the session, the participants should be able to:• Identify kinds of malnutrition in their community • Understand causes of the kinds of malnutrition in their community • Understand the consequences of malnutrition in the community • Share actions they can take to prevent malnutrition among children and womenLearning Objectives MalnutritionChronic malnutrition is malnutrition caused by longterm food deprivation or illness. An example is stunting.This refers to a child having short height for their age. It can begin during pregnancy and through infancy (up to 5 year of age). If not corrected before two years of the child's age, the effects become irreversible.Malnutrition occurs when a person does not receive nutrients in the required amounts (less or excess). This can be a result of several factors and is a result of inadequate food intake and the health status (immediate causes, which are at an individual level).These factors in turn are affected by the individual or household's access to food, the care available, the availability of suitable health services and an unhealthy environment (underlying causes). The resources available in a household and community and how they are used are issues that influence underlying causes of malnutrition (see figure below). Acute malnutrition is a result of short-term lack of food deprivation or illness that results in sudden weight loss or oedema.This refers to a child having a weight that is too low for their age. When severely underweight, the child is weak, has poor physical stamina and a weak immune system leaving them prone to other infections and illnesses.ii. Wasting Wasting refers to a child having a weight that is too low for their height. It is a strong predictor of mortality of children under 5 years.• Iron is required for the synthesis of haemoglobin, which transports oxygen to the cells in our body.It is required by every growing cell and therefore is essential for child growth and development. It is involved in energy production, immunity, and regulation of the central nervous system.• Iron deficiency may lead to iron deficiency anaemia, a condition experienced when the body is not making enough haemoglobin.• Signs of iron deficiency anaemia include fatigue, weakness, tiredness, loss of appetite, headaches, shortness of breath and paleness. Pale skin (especially on palms), pale lips and paleness on the inside of the bottom eyelid.• Iron deficiency during early childhood can impair physical and cognitive development.Signs of anaemia can be seen in the figure 10 below. ii. Vitamin A deficiency• Vitamin A helps keep eyes healthy, promotes vision, and provides protection against infection.• Vitamin A is needed by the tissues that line our lungs, gastrointestinal tract and eyes.• Without adequate vitamin A, these tissues are susceptible to bacterial invasion; as such, deficiency is associated with frequent illness and severe deficiency may result in blindness.• Signs of vitamin A deficiency include night blindness, Bigot's spots and keratomalacia (in order of severity).• This deficiency is associated with high rates of respiratory and diarrheal infections. iii. Iodine deficiency disorder• Iodine is essential in the proper functioning of the thyroid gland, which helps to regulate the body's use of energy (metabolism).• Iodine is essential for physical and mental growth, and it is particularly important during foetal development.• Goitre, a swelling of the thyroid gland, is the most notable symptom of iodine deficiency.• Severe maternal iodine deficiency can result in cretinism, whereby the child is born with severe physical and mental retardation.• Less severe forms of iodine deficiency in young children can cause mental deficits such as lower mental development, lower cognitive function and reduced ability to focus.• Goitre is reversible whereas cretinism is irreversible.• Overnutrition is an excess consumption of energy and nutrients. It can lead to overweight and obesity.• Being overweight or obese increases the likelihood of having diabetes and heart-related diseases like high blood pressure.• Overweight and obesity ranges are determined by using weight and height to calculate a number called the body mass index (BMI). An adult who has a BMI between 25 and 29.9 is considered over weight and an adult who has a BMI of 30-35 is considered obese and an adult with a BMI of 40 or more, or 30 or more.• BMI is established through dividing weight in kg by height (cm) squared.The consequences of malnutrition in an individual can extend to later in life. In addition, the effects can also affect future generations. This particularly occurs for women, where their nutrition status affects the unborn child. A stunted girl is likely to become a stunted adolescent and later a stunted woman. This affects her health, productivity, and nutrition. Which in turn increases the chance that her children will be born malnourished. Which continues the cycle. It is therefore important that interventions to address and prevent malnutrition are taken at each stage of the life cycle. The facilitator probes for in-between meals, and details of the foods consumed.The facilitator then uses this example to show the participants how to determine the dietary diversity scores whether household of individual i.e. Minimum dietary diversity score for women. The facilitator used the food groups discussed earlier and works together with the participants to establish whether the example sites meets the required diversity. About 2-3 other volunteers with one descrtibing how they fed their child is done to ensure understanding on how to determing whether different household members are meeting the required dietary diversity. The session's technical notes are used to provide details on the dietary diversity indicators and make any clarifications needed.At the beginning of the session the facilitator is expected to understand the entry level knowledge of participants in regard to the session content.At the end of this session participants are expected to:• Describe the common dietary assessment methods and dietary indicators to measure dietary adequacy • Demonstrate ability to use common anthropometric equipment to take accurate measurements • Use a combination of anthropometric measurements to determine nutritional status of individualsFood and Nutrition assessmentFood intake can be measured in terms of quantity and quality. However, based on our communities and the capacity of service providers available, it is difficult to capture quality. We therefore focus on assessing quality. The quality of the diets is measured by assessing the diversity of the diets at individual and household level.Assessment of dietary diversity is about consumption of a balanced diet, one that has a variety of different foods from different food groups one that provides the correct amounts of nutrients needed by the body to maintain health, growth, and development. Below are some of the ways dietary diversity can be assessed.The household dietary diversity score (HDDS) reflects the economic ability of a household to access a variety of foods. An increase in dietary diversity is associated with socio-economic status and household food security.Assessment of household dietary diversity involves finding out the different foods consumed by the household over a period of 24 hours. This covers only foods consumed at home and excludes foods purchased and eaten outside the home. After establishing the different foods consumed, the foods are grouped into the respective food groups. For measuring household dietary diversity, 12 standard food groups are used as listed below. Consumption of 3 or less food groups is considered low dietary diversity, consumption of between 4-5 food groups is considered moderate dietary diversity while consumption of more than 6 food groups is considered high dietary diversity.Food groups are: Cereals; White roots & tubers, and bananas; Fruits; Vegetables; Meat and meat products; Eggs; Fish; Milk and milk products; Legumes, nuts and seeds; Oils or fats; sweets and sugars; condiments, spices and other beverages.Individual dietary diversity scores aim to reflect nutrient adequacy. An increase in individual dietary diversity score is related to increased nutrient adequacy of the diet. Individual scores are preferable to household scores because they provide more specific reflection of the quality of the diet and status of nutrition.When assessing individual dietary diversity, the foods consumed by the individual over a 24-hour period are established. This included all food eaten or drunk both at home and away from home. After establishing the different foods consumed, the foods are grouped into the respective food groups. 12 food groups are used, similar to those for household dietary diversity above. Consumption of 3 or less food groups is considered low dietary diversity, consumption of between 4-5food groups is considered moderate dietary diversity while consumption of more than 6 food groups is considered high dietary diversity.Minimum Dietary Diversity Score for Women (MDDS-W)The Minimum Dietary Diversity Score for Women is a food group diversity indicator that has been shown to reflect an additional key dimension of diet quality that is micronutrient adequacy. The foods consumed over a 24-hour period are established including all food eaten or drunk both at home and away from home.After establishing the different foods consumed, the foods are grouped into 10 food groups.Consumption of foods from any 5 food groups and above indicates meeting minimum dietary diversity. iii. Minimum Acceptable Diets (MAD)Proportion of children 6-23 months of age who receive a minimum acceptable diet (apart from breast milk). This indicator measures both the minimum feeding frequency and minimum dietary diversity, as appropriate for various age groups. If a child meets the minimum feeding frequency and minimum dietary diversity for their age group and breastfeeding status, then they are considered to receive a minimum acceptable diet. Minimum is considered as follows:-2 times for breastfed infants (6-8months -3 times for breastfed children (9-23months)-4 times for non-breastfed children/infants Meal is defined as any solid. Semi-solid or liquid food given to the child alone or within a composite dish within the previous day.Breastfed children 6-23 months of age who had at least the minimum dietary diversity and the minimum meal frequency during the previous day Non-breastfed children 6-23 months of age who received at least 2 milk feedings and had at least the minimum dietary diversity not including milk feeds and the minimum meal frequency during the previous dayThis composite indicator will be calculated from the following two fractions: After explaining minimum meal frequency, minimum dietary diversity and minimum acceptable diets for children, the facilitator presents the following children in different households. All children are 1 year old and are breast fed. And below are the number of meals and number of food groups they consumeThe facilitator reviews the refence points for each of these indicators for the example as shown in the tableThe facilitator then asks the participants if the minimum meal frequency, minimum dietary diversity, and minimum acceptable diets have been met for each of the children. Placing an X or √ (for yes or no) It is based on the 8 questions shown below. Have no food to eat of any kind in your household of a lack of resources to get food? 7Were hungry but not able to eat of a lack of resources to get food? 8Go a whole day without eating anything at all because of a lack of resources to get food?The answers are placed on a scale of severity of food insecurity as shown below: ii. Household hunger scale (HHS) Most appropriate to use in areas of substantial food insecurity essentially a behavioural measure, captures more severe behaviours. It is based on 3 main questions:• Was there ever no food to eat of any kind in your house because of lack of resources to get food?• Did you or any household member go to sleep at night hungry because there was not enough food?• Did you or any household member go a whole day and night without eating anything because there was not enough food?For each of the questions one asks how often the occurrence was observed: never (0 times), rarely (1 or 2 times), sometimes (3-10 times, and often (more than 10 times).One can either choose to use the HFIES or the HHS based on the context.1. Time: 60 Minutes 2. Method: Presentations and discussion and demonstrationsThe facilitator introduces the section on nutrition status assessment. The facilitator explains that good nutrition care starts with good assessment of the nutritional status. The facilitator explains various methods of assessment which include; anthropometry, dietary, clinical and biochemical methods. The facilitator then gives introductory paragraph about several methods, biochemical and anthropometric and scope of this manual in relation to the projects Participants form 5 groups, and each group is allocated a measurement. Facilitators take 10 minutes teaching the groups how to take the respective measurements. Groups take 10 minutes to practice taking the measurements.Following this, the facilitator takes 10 minutes explaining the growth charts and how to plot the measurements to determine the nutrition status (stunting, underweight A. Height/length 1) Height This measurement is taken for children two years and above and/or for those greater than 85cm.The following as steps for taking accurate height measurements• Set the measuring board vertically on a stable level surface.• Remove the child's shoes and any head-covering.• Place the child on the measuring board, standing upright in the middle of the board.• The child's heels and knees should be firmly pressed against the board by the assistant while the measurer positions the head and the cursor. The child's head, shoulders, buttocks, knees and heels should be touching the board.• Read and announce the measurement to the nearest 0.1cm.• Record and repeat the measurement to the measurer to make sure it has been correctly heard 2) Length This measurement is taken for children below two years of age and/or for those who are less than 85 cm or unable to stand.• Place the measuring board horizontally on a flat, level surface.• Remove the child's shoes and any head covering.• Place the child so he/she is lying down and face up in the middle of the board.• Allow the assistant to hold the sides of the child's head and position the head until it is touching the head board.• Allow the measurer to place his/her hands on the child and firmly hold the child's knees together while pressing down. The soles of the feet should be flat on the foot piece, toes pointing up at right angles.• The measurer should immediately remove the child's feet from contact with the footboard with one hand while holding the footboard securely in place with the other.• Read and record the measurement as shown in diagram above Because of its complexity and proneness to mistakes, taking the measurement need to be trained on how to use the equipment and that there is a need to do more than 1 measurement to catch any errors.Taking weight of a child on a floor scale. Ask the caregiver to stand on the scale's surface in the middle and record their weight to the nearest 100g when the caregiver is settled and the weight reading is stable. This is the weight of the adult 5. Zero the scale using the appropriate button 6. Hand the child to the caregiver when the scale reads 0kg7. When the caregiver is settled with the child and the weight reading is stable record the weight to the nearest 100g. This is the weight of the child.8. Read and announce the value from the scale. The assistant should repeat the value for verification and record it immediately.The age should be recorded as accurate as possible so that the correct cut off can be used to determine nutrition status. The age can be determined from official documents (health card, immunization card, and birth certificate). If official documents are not available, use a local calendar of events to determine the month and year of birth.If a child's length or height is less than 110 cm or if the child cannot touch his/her ear with the opposite hand by extending the arm over the head, he/she should be treated as under 5 years.The age of the child, together with the weight and height are used to determine if the child is well nourished, under or over nourished.• Stunting: height and age• Underweight: weight and age• Wasting: weight and heightThe above measurements are compared against WHO Child Growth Standards to determine the status of the child Charts There are different charts, and different charts for assessing stunting, underweight, and wasting; for boys and girls; and for different ages.For each chart, a child has normal height for age or weight for age or weight for height, if their results are plotted between the 2 and -2 lines.If the results are plotted below the -2 line, they are stunted, underweight or wasted.If their results are below the -3 line, they are severely stunted, underweight or wasted.Below is an example, a growth chart showing weight for age for girls aged 0 to 2 years. Oedema is a build-up of fluids in the tissues causing abnormal swelling of the hands and feet or other body parts. The body requires nutrients for various processes that lead to normal fluid balance. Oedema caused by malnutrition has to occur in both limbs at the same time.• Apply normal thumb pressure on both feet• Count the numbers 101, 102, 103 to estimate three seconds without using a watch• Check if a shallow print persists on both feet• If the print persits in both feet, it implies the child has nutritional odema (pitting oedema) and is severely malnourished Activity: In 5 groups, participants take 10 minutes to discuss:1) The importance of hygiene during food acquisition and storage and should be done in our homes to ensure hygiene during food acquisition and storage2) The importance of hygiene during food preparation, serving and consumption and should be done in our homes to ensure hygiene during food preparation, serving and consumption3) The importance of personal hygiene and should be done in our homes to ensure personal hygiene 4) The importance of household hygiene and should be done in our homes to ensure household hygiene 5) The importance of clean and safe water and should be done in our homes to ensure clean and safe waterGroups take 5 minutes each to present their findings.The facilitator takes 10 minutes to wrap up the session, making any clarification needed. Supplement the points they share with points from the manual if they have not been mentionedFood safety refers to the proper handling, cooking, and preservation of food in order to protect us from foodborne illnesses caused by microbes such as viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi.At the beginning of the session the facilitator is expected to understand the entry level knowledge and behavior of participants in regard to the session content.At the end of this session participants are expected to:1. List at least four practices importance in good personal hygiene;2. Practice good hygienic during food preparation, cooking and storageFood Safety and HygieneIt is important that the food we eat and the water we drink is clean and safe. So, it is essential to prepare meals in a safe, hygienic way. If germs get into our foods and drinks, they may give us food poisoning (resulting, for example, in diarrhoea or vomiting). The people most likely to become sick are young children and people who are already ill, particularly people living with HIV/ AIDS.Basic rules of hygiene aim to:• Prevent germs from reaching foods and drinks. Many germs come from human or animal faeces. Germs can reach food via:-Dirty hands, flies and other insects, mice and other animals and dirty utensils -Water supplies if they are not protected from faeces.• Prevent germs from multiplying in foods and reaching dangerous levels. Germs breed fastest in food that is warm and wet (e.g., Porridge), especially if it contains sugar or animal protein, such as milk.A. Food acquisition and storage• Buy fresh foods, such as meat or fish, on the day they will eat them. Look for the signs of poorquality food.• Cover raw and cooked foods to protect them from insects, rodents and dust.• Store fresh food (especially foods from animals) and cooked foods in a cool place, or a refrigerator if available.• Keep dry foods such as flours and legumes in a dry, cool place protected from insects, rodents and other pests.• Avoid storing leftovers for more than a few hours (unless in a refrigerator). Always store them covered and reheat them thoroughly until hot and steaming (bring liquid food to a rolling boil).• Keep food preparation surfaces clean. Use clean, carefully washed dishes and utensils to store, prepare, serve and eat food.• Prepare food on a clean table where there is less dust.• Wash vegetables and fruits with clean/safe water. Peel if possible.• Prevent raw meat, offal, poultry and fish from touching other foods, as these animal foods often contain germs. Wash surfaces touched by these raw foods with hot water and soap.• Cook meat, offal, poultry and fish well. Meat should have no red juices.• Boil eggs so they are hard. Do not eat raw or cracked eggs.• Boil milk unless it is from a safe source. Soured milk may be safer than fresh milk.• Wash hands with soap or ash under flowing water before preparing or eating food.• Cover food with a cloth, net, or lid and avoid contamination of cooked food with raw food• Wash the cups, bowls, or mixing utensils for the food thoroughly with soap and water. Dry them in the sun on a drying rack. Bacteria breed in food that sticks to utensils.• The environment in and around the home (including the kitchen, serving area, eating area) should all be kept clean Hygiene Hygiene refers to practices that promote or ensure health and prevent disease, especially through cleanliness.Advise people to:• Wash hands with clean water and soap (or ashes):o After going to the toilet, cleaning a baby's bottom or cleaning clothes, dirty bed linen or surfaces contaminated with faeces. It is most important to wash hands after contact with faeces;o Before and after preparing food and eating; o Before feeding a child or sick person (make sure they wash their hands too).• Dry hands by: o Shaking and rubbing them together;o Using a clean cloth that is kept only for this purpose.• Keep fingernails short and clean.• Avoid coughing or spitting near food or water.• Cover any wounds on hands to prevent contamination of food during its preparation.• Use a latrine and keep it clean and free of flies.• Teach small children to use a potty and toilet. Put children's feaces in the latrine.• Keep the body and clothes clean and regularly brush the teeth• Keep the surroundings of the home free from animal faeces, bushes and other rubbish.• Clear any stagnant water• Use and keep the toilet or latrine clean• Use a utensil rack to dry them after washing• Do not share rooms with animals• Keep rubbish in a covered bin and empty it regularly in appropriate places (pits, compost) so as not to attract flies.• For easy waste management separate the waste such as plastic, glass, paper and food/plant remain.• Make compost for the garden with suitable waste food, garden rubbish and animal faeces.Composting destroys germs in faeces. The compost pit should be at least partially shaded and at least 2 feet from a structure like your house or a fence. It should be at a place convenient for you to add materials, access to water and good drainage. In addition, you should take into consideration the direction of the wind so that the smell or odors doesn't come to the house.• Other rubbish should be burnt• Drink treated or boiled water• Store treated water in a covered container with a small mouth.• Serve water by pouring or using with a clean ladle or cup. This cup should not the same used to drink• Regularly clean the container that stores drinking water At the end of the session, let the facilitator ask whether there are any additional questions or points of clarification. After all clarifications are made (if any), the facilitator closes the session and mentions the next session and its facilitator.Time: 60 minutes.Activity: The facilitator takes 5 minutes to introduce the session and give instructions.In 5 groups participants discuss what factors or issues determine the proportion of income allocated to food by households in their communities.This discussion should include what should then be done to ensure that food that is a balanced diet is a priority of the households.Groups take 10 minutes to discuss and 5 minutes to present their findings to other participants.At the end of the session, let the facilitator ask whether there are any additional questions or points of clarification. After all clarifications are made (if any), the facilitator closes the session and mentions the next session and its facilitator.At the beginning of the session the facilitator is expected to understand the entry level knowledge and behavior of participants in regard to the session content.At the end of this session participants are expected to:1. Understand the significance of allocating household income to increase family food 2. Know the value of increasing the growing of crops for the home consumption 3. Identify behaviours that affect allocation of income to food security.4. Practice good hygienic during food preparation, cooking and storageUtilisation of income for food and nutrition securityThrough the PRELNOR and VODPII projects, household income is improving. In addition, more land is being allocated to commercial crops and less food crops for home consumption are being grown, especially in the VODPII areas.It is important that the food and nutrition security of the households also improves as income increases.Income when used effectively can be used to ensure household food and nutrition security both when food crops are grown or not.Factors that determine proportion of income allocated to food include:1) Sources of food and quantities accessed: these can be from own farm production or bought from the market 2) Household characteristics: these include the household size; the ages of the household members; the health status of the members, for example are they healthy, pregnant, breastfeeding, or sick. These characteristics all determine how much food is needed in the household 3) Household needs and priorities: the number and extent of other household needs such as shelter, health care, education, transport, hygiene, fuel, etc all influence how income is used in the household.If buying food or particular food items is not a priority, then the amount allocated to food is small 4) Social and gender dynamics: how the man and woman heading the household interact and plan for the household also influences how much income is allocated to food. Are they able to budget together? Do they both find food, especially a balanced diet a priority?Ways in which income can be used to ensure households consume a balanced diet and are food and nutrition secure include:• Budgeting for the family income to meet the various needs• Plan to have a family size that is manageable to reduce on the family expenditure• Use family income to improve sanitation and hygiene to prevent illnesses that cause both malnutrition and selling of family food for treatment. For example, pit latrine, drying rack, water storage, food storage, waste management, mosquito nets, are some of the things that can be invested in• Save money for future use. This can be through saving groups, banks, etc. this will provide a source of income when food is scarce• Use family income allocated to food to ensure a family has a balanced diet. What foods are not produced at home should be carefully budgeted for and bought in order to meet the family's nutritional needs• Use family income allocated to food to buy good seeds for planting as well as other required inputs such as manure, fertiliser, etc Participants are grouped according to their designations within the project and where possible, based on the districts. Categories include:Each of these groups takes 30 minutes to discuss:1) Current operational framework for extension service provision 2) Identification of nutrition related indicators that can be assessed in the current framework as a way of mainstreaming nutrition3) Tools required to mainstream nutrition (what kind of job aids would be require)Groups take 10 minutes to present their resultsThe facilitator takes 15 minutes to wrap up the sessionAt the end of this session participants are expected to:Identify operational frame work for extension service provisionIdentify nutrition related indicators that can be assessed in the current frame work as a way of main streaming nutrition.Identify tools that are required to mainstream nutrition Development of action plans to mainstream nutrition related activities.At the end of the session, let the facilitator ask whether there are any additional questions or points of clarification. After all clarifications are made (if any), the facilitator closes the session and mentions the next session and its facilitator.Daily requirement of Energy, carbohydrates, protein, fat, vitamins A, vitamin A, iron and zinc for different sex and age groups. Note: 1 g protein or 1 g carbohydrates = 4 kcal; 1 g fat = 9kcal; 1 g alcohol = 7kcal. Fat requirements were calculated to provide 25% of average energy requirements.A. Subtract 10 kcal/d for males and 7 kcal/d for females for each year of age above 19 years.B. Protein requirements based on 1.5 g/kg/day for infants, 1.1 g/kg/day for 1-3 y, 0.95 g/kg/day for 4-13 y, 0.85 g/kg/day for 14-18 y, 0.8g /kg/day for adults, and 1.1 g/kg/day for pregnant (using prepregnancy weight) and lactating women. F. Bioavailability of iron during this period varies greatly.G. It is recommended that iron supplements be given to all pregnant women because of the difficulties in correctly evaluating iron status in pregnancy.H. Assumed bio-availability of dietary zinc is low-15 percent.*A female child aged between 9-13years but non-menstruating Sources: Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate. Fibre, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (2002/2005). This report may be accessed via www.nap.edu FAO/WHO (2004). Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition: Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2002090728.json b/main/part_2/2002090728.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1524e3a1a52c927b8f773d9ebba674a0b058fb7d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2002090728.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3f34492c81d753dc7bd51ef08993e645","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5bd215cf-aa88-4fb6-8bf4-198ed777747b/retrieve","id":"1654045151"},"keywords":["Cajanus cajan","coton","fertilité chimique","fertilité physique","maïs","Mucuna","rendement","Bénin","Afrique de l'Ouest. viii ix"],"sieverID":"18f179b9-8bcc-47f5-86e6-7b0e977f50fc","content":"The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) delivers research-based solutions that address the global crises of malnutrition, climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation.The Alliance focuses on the nexus of agriculture, the environment, and nutrition. We work with local, national, and multinational partners across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean, and with the public and private sectors and civil society. Through novel partnerships, the Alliance generates evidence and mainstreams innovations to transform food systems and landscapes so that they sustain the planet, drive prosperity, and nourish people in a climate crisis.The Alliance is part of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), the world's largest agricultural research and innovation partnership for a food-secure future, dedicated to reducing poverty, enhancing food and nutrition security, and improving natural resources. https://alliancebioversityciat.org www.cgiar.org CGIAR is a global research partnership for a food-secure future. CGIAR science is dedicated to reducing poverty, enhancing food and nutrition security, and improving natural resources and ecosystem services. Its research is carried out by 15 CGIAR Centers in close collaboration with hundreds of partners, including national and regional research institutes, civil society organizations, academia, development organizations, and the private sector.Tableau 1: Caractéristiques principales des huit zones agro-écologiques du Bénin ---------------5Tableau 2: Espèces de CCEV promues dans différentes régions du Bénin et leurs principales utilisations - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8 Tableau 3: Caractéristiques générales des sites ProSOL au Bénin- ------------------------------------------11 Tableau 4: Répartition des essais par commune, culture et type de CCEV ----------------------------- Tableau 8 : Résultats de l'analyse de variance pour les facteurs aléatoires et fixes pour le maïs et le coton - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------34 Tableau 15 : Évaluation des pratiques agricoles conventionnelles de l'Alibori - ----------------------35 Tableau 16 : Évaluation des pratiques agricoles améliorées des CCEV de l'Alibori - ----------------35 Tableau 17 : Evaluation des pratiques agricoles conventionnelles du Borgou - ----------------------- -----------------------------38 Rolf Sommer/ Alliance of Bioversity International and CIATLa baisse continue de la fertilité des sols constitue l'une des principales contraintes des pays de l'Afrique sub-Saharienne avec pour conséquence la baisse du niveau de productivité des cultures (Saidou et al., 2012). Une étude récente menée au Bénin dans les départements du Zou, Borgou et Alibori indique que 90% des terres ont un niveau de fertilité faible à très faible (ProSOL, 2016a). Pour faire face à cette baisse de fertilité, les engrais chimiques ont été proposés, cependant ils coûtent chers et ne sont pas souvent accessibles pour la grande masse paysanne (Sokpoh, 1997). De nombreux systèmes de culture ont été testés aussi bien en station qu'en milieu réel (Azontondé et Kpagbin, 2008) puis proposés aux agriculteurs comme alternatives aux engrais minéraux. Au nombre de ces systèmes de culture, on a l'utilisation des plantes de couvertures en association ou en rotation, comme Cajanus cajan et Mucuna pruriens var utilis (Azontondé & Kpagbin, 2008 ;Allagbé et al., 2015) ou encore le fumier de ferme. Malheureusement, l'intégration agriculture-élevage à travers l'utilisation des déjections animales pour amender les terres dégradées n'est pas très optimale (ProSOL, 2016b) à cause de la gestion complexe de ces ressources et du nombre limité des animaux par ménage. Il s'avère donc pertinent, surtout dans une perspective de durabilité des systèmes de production, de réfléchir à des mécanismes qui génèrent naturellement le fonctionnement des processus biologiques, à savoir la jachère améliorée avec les CCEV.Au Bénin, plusieurs espèces de plantes de couvertures ont été introduites depuis les années 1980 (Houndékon et al., 1998), mais deux sont encore cultivées : Mucuna pruriens et Cajanus cajan. Les résultats obtenus par Versteeg et Koudokpon (1993) montrent que le rendement grain du maïs produit après l'utilisation du Mucuna était de 70% plus élevé que le témoin sans Mucuna au Bénin. Kouelo et al. (2013) ont montré que l'apport d'azote et phosphore sur une rotation Mucuna-maïs n'a pas amélioré de façon significative le rendement du maïs en comparaison avec la rotation sans apport. Au Togo, Sogbedji et al. (2006) ont révélé que le Cajanus cajan permet la restructuration du sol et l'augmentation du rendement du maïs, et que l'utilisation de Mucuna pruriens comme plante de couverture augmente de façon significative les taux d'azote et de phosphore dans le sol. Au Burkina Faso, Coulibaly et al. (2017) ont montré qu'il n'y a pas de différence significative entre la pratique vulgarisée (150kg de NPK et 50kg d'Urée) et l'apport localisé à la micro-dose (75kg de NPK et 50kg d'Urée).Depuis 2015, le projet ProSOL pour améliorer la sécurité alimentaire intervient dans quatre départements (Zou, Collines, Borgou et Alibori) au Bénin à travers l'intégration des mesures de Gestion Durable des Terres (GDT).La GDT est une stratégie permettant de recourir à des technologies et approches de « bonnes pratiques » pour résoudre le problème de dégradation des sols. Elle contribue non seulement à améliorer la productivité des sols, mais aussi à fournir de nombreux services écosystémiques (ProSOL, 2016b).Depuis quelques années, on assiste à un afflux d'intérêt pour les CCEV. Certaines CCEV ont déjà été testées par la GIZ et ses partenaires dans les trois pays d'opérationnalisation. En général, il a été prouvé que les technologies CCEV améliorent les performances agronomiques des exploitations agricoles, ainsi que la fertilité et la santé des sols.Cependant, malgré quelques décennies de recherches sur les CCEV, l'adoption de cette technologie par les agriculteurs au Bénin est faible. Selon Floquet et al. (2015), en évaluant le stade atteint par l'introduction du Mucuna dans les systèmes de culture, ils concluent que la trajectoire d'innovation purement technologique, sans les volets organisationnels et économiques qui auraient pu permettre le développement autonome d'une filière rentable de semences et d'intrants, a contribué à réduire l'intérêt d'une plante de couverture non-alimentaire et non-commercialisable dans les systèmes à base de maïs et coton.Toutefois, étant donné que les CCEV sont intelligents du point de vue climatique et qu'ils rendent des services écosystémiques, il est possible d'étudier des moyens d'incitation pour l'adoption des CCEV par les agriculteurs, si nécessaire, à travers le biais de paiements directs ou indirects. C'est pour cela que la présente étude a été initiée afin d'évaluer les intérêts biophysiques des CCEV dans la protection et la réhabilitation des sols, et de chercher les voies et les moyens pour faciliter leur adoption par les producteurs. Le projet permettra à la GIZ d'accroître la protection et la réhabilitation des sols en apportant des preuves scientifiques des bénéfices et des contraintes des CCEV.L'approche globale, à la base de ce projet, était double puisqu'elle s'appuyait sur les résultats scientifiques disponibles ainsi que sur les connaissances et les pratiques des agriculteurs encadrés par le ProSOL.Revue de la littérature sur les CCEV ;Collecte de données sur les connaissances des agriculteurs sur les CCEV ;Evaluation agronomique des bénéfices des CCEV à travers des expérimentations participatives en milieux paysans;Coordination du programme des activités. Depuis 1920, les cultures de couverture étaient utilisées comme des cultures destinées spécifiquement à couvrir le sol afin de le protéger à la fois contre l'érosion et les pertes d'éléments nutritifs par infiltration et ruissellement (Parker, 1920 ;Pieters & McKee, 1938). Plus récemment, Florentín et al. (2010) ont défini les CCEV comme des plantes semées indépendamment, ou associées à d'autres cultures, destinées à couvrir le sol et à en améliorer ses caractéristiques physiques, chimiques et biologiques.Ainsi, pour qu'une culture soit considérée comme culture de couverture, les conditions suivantes s'avèrent importantes : 1) être facile à établir; 2) avoir un taux de croissance rapide pour réaliser une couverture suffisante du sol; 3) produire une grande quantité de matière sèche; 4) résister aux maladies et ne pas agir comme hôte pour les maladies des cultures associées; 5) être facile à gérer; 6) être économiquement viable; 7) s'enraciner profondément; 8) avoir peu ou pas de concurrence pour l'humidité et les nutriments avec la culture principale et 9) avoir de multiples utilisations (Reeves, 1994;Khan et al., 2002;Gachene & Kimaru, 2003).En Afrique subsaharienne, les sols sont caractérisés par une faible teneur en éléments nutritifs (Gachene et al., 1997 ;Saïdou et al., 2018) et par conséquent une faible productivité des cultures, l'insécurité alimentaire et la malnutrition, en particulier dans les petites exploitations agricoles (Mugwe et al., 2009 ;UN, 2007 ;Florentín et al., 2010). Bien que l'utilisation d'engrais minéraux pour augmenter la productivité des cultures soit en augmentation (Triberti et al., 2016 ;Diogo et al., 2017), la majorité des petits exploitants ont un accès limité à des fonds pour l'achat d'engrais et pratiquent une production à faible intrant (Ndakidemi, 2006 ;Klutse et al., 2018). Cette production continue associée à l'utilisation inadéquate d'engrais minéraux (Diogo et al., 2018a) a entraîné une augmentation des taux d'extraction des éléments nutritifs du sol et a contribué à l'infertilité des sols (Henao & Baanante, 2006).Les CCEV sont un bon complément à d'autres pratiques d'amélioration de la santé du sol en raison de leur prix abordable et de leurs effets améliorateurs sur la santé du sol (Chianu et al., 2008). Ainsi, les principaux genres recensés dans de nombreux pays incluent : Mucuna, Aeschynomene, Stylosanthes, Lablab, Canavalia, Crotalaria, Desmodium, Cajanus et Stylosanthes sont. D'autres cultures régulières, même si elles ont été utilisées pendant longtemps comme cultures vivrières, présentent les caractéristiques des cultures de couverture mentionnées ci-dessus. Dans cette revue, si la principale raison de production de ces cultures est l'avantage du sol, comme par exemple par l'amélioration de la fertilité grâce à la couverture maximale ou l'augmentation de la matière organique par la rétention de résidus, alors ces cultures sont considérées comme des CCEV. De telles cultures incluent par exemples : les arachides, le soja et le niébé.Les cultures de couverture améliorent la teneur en matière organique du sol associée à une capacité accrue de rétention d'eau dans les sols à texture sableuse (Becker et al., 1995). En outre, les CCEV fournissent également une couverture de sol qui le protège contre l'érosion hydrique et éolienne (Parker, 1920 Les engrais verts et les cultures de couverture au Bénin -informations tirées de la revue littéraire, de l'évaluation agronomique et de la modélisation de la durabilité des systèmes de culture 1938 ; Hoorman, 2009) et les mauvaises herbes (Carsky et al., 2001). Ils créent également des conditions favorables pour la diversité et les fonctions de la biodiversité souterraine impliquées dans les transformations et le cycle des éléments nutritifs du sol (Midega et al., 2013 ;Vukicevich et al., 2016) et l'agrégation des sols (Hoorman, 2009 ;Soti et al., 2016). Certaines CCEV, telles que Mucuna et Canavalia, réduisent la prévalence des nématodes qui attaquent les céréales (Arim et al., 2006). En outre, Canavalia ensiformis est un remède biologique du sol pour les herbicides Sulfentrazole (Madalão et al., 2017).Les CCEV jouent un rôle important dans la fixation de l'azote, pouvant atteindre jusqu'à 320 kg N ha -1 en fonction du type de CCEV, de la quantité de précipitation et de l'état de la fertilité du sol (Ojiem et al., 2007). Par exemple, dans l'Ouest du Kenya, la fixation de l'azote atmosphérique (N 2 ) dans les champs très fertiles à moyennement fertiles a diminué de 12% et de 22% dans les champs moyennement fertiles à peu fertiles (Ojiem et al., 2007). Le Mucuna, le Lablab et l'arachide ont un potentiel de fixation de N 2 élevé dans les ZAE et les gradients de fertilité du sol (Ojiem et al., 2007). Parmi les autres avantages tirés des CCEV, il y a la régulation du changement climatique par la séquestration du carbone (Olson et al., 2014 ;Lal, 2015), l'amélioration des rendements céréaliers (Gachene et al., 2000 ;Maobe et al., 2000 ;Salako et Tian, 2003 ;Fofana, 2005 ;Kaizzi et al., 2006) et du fourrage pour les animaux (Weber, 1996). Cependant, des résultats contradictoires sur les avantages de rendement ont également été rapportés dans d'autres études (Mathuva et al., 1998 ;Giller, 2001;Kaizzi et al., 2006). Le Bénin est fortement dépendant de l'agriculture, source de subsistance pour environ 80% de sa population et contribuant pour environ 38% de son produit intérieur brut (Gollin & Rogerson, 2014). Les cultures vivrières de base comprennent : l'igname, le manioc, le haricot, le riz et le maïs. Les principales cultures de rentes sont le coton, les noix de cajou, les noix de karité, les ananas, les palmiers, le cacao et le café (Minot & Daniels, 2005). Sur la production totale dans les 18 districts, deux cultures couvrent la plus grande superficie, à savoir le maïs avec environ 36% et le coton entre 65 et 87% ; le coton étant la principale culture d'exportation du Bénin (MAEP, 2015). (2016) populaire au sein des agriculteurs en 1990 en raison de sa capacité à supprimer les mauvaises herbes comme Imperata cylindrica et Striga hermontica (Galiba et al., 1998). Les agriculteurs des départements de l'Atacora, de l'Atlantique, du Borgou, du Mono, de l'Ouémé et du Zou travaillant avec Sasakawa Global 2000 (SG, 2000) ont signalé une élimination complète d'Imperata après 2 ou 3 cultures consécutives de Mucuna (Galiba et al., 1998). De plus, lorsqu'il a été utilisé dans des jachères améliorées, le Mucuna a considérablement amélioré les rendements des cultures ultérieures. Par exemple, après un an de jachère du Mucuna, une augmentation du rendement du maïs a été observée pour les variétés de maïs locales (500 kg ha -1 ) et améliorées (800 kg ha -1 ; Versteeg et Koudokpon, 1993). L'augmentation du rendement correspond aux estimations de l'apport d'azote supérieur à 100 kg N ha -1 de Mucuna par fixation biologique de l'azote (Fofana, 2005).Jointvetch Porcupine (Aeschynomene histrix), une plante dicotylédone de la famille des fabacées, est une légumineuse herbacée adaptée à un large éventail de sols et de climats, et qui prospère également dans des conditions de sol défavorables (sablonneuses, stériles, acides et mal drainées). Introduit depuis la Côte d'Ivoire en 1989, Aeschynomene histrix (A. histrix) a été évalué dans les savanes du nord du Bénin en 1998 (Ehouinsou & Aboh, 1998). Cette évaluation portait sur les techniques culturales, la tolérance aux maladies et à la sécheresse, les méthodes de gestion, la production de biomasse, la production de semences et la teneur en protéines brutes. Le résultat de l'étude indique que A. Histrix est adapté à l'écologie des savanes du nord du Bénin. Il a été introduit au Bénin pour l'alimentation des animaux et la régénération des sols. La culture améliore non seulement la fertilité du sol, mais agit également comme une couverture du sol et produit une grande quantité de fourrage de qualité, en particulier pendant la saison sèche. A. histrix peut produire 2 à 6 tonnes de matière sèche et environ 260 kg ha -1 y -1 de grains. Soja (Glycine max) est une légumineuse à grains avec une productivité élevée de biomasse contenant environ 3,5% N et 0,15% P (Gachene et Kimaru, 2003). Le soja fixe jusqu'à 300 kg N ha -1 (Hungria et al., 2006) et contribue à hauteur de 112 kg N ha -1 à la culture suivante (Gentry et al., 2001). Il restaure et maintient la fertilité des sols de manière durable, ce qui conduit à améliorer les rendements (Smaling et al., 2008). (Vissoh, 2006) dans le but d'accroître la fertilité des sols. La culture se porte bien dans les zones où les altitudes sont <1 600m et >1 000mm de précipitations. Deux systèmes de gestion ont été mis au point dans la zone subhumide du sud du Bénin, dans le but d'intégrer le Mucuna aux systèmes de culture afin d'améliorer la fertilité des sols et de lutter contre les mauvaises herbes. Ces systèmes comprennent : Établissement de Mucuna comme seule culture de couverture en courte jachère pour les champs sérieusement dégradés et, Mucuna planté comme relais dans les champs de maïs nécessitant moins de réhabilitation. Dans la zone bimodale du sud du Bénin, le Mucuna est planté en mars et en avril afin de maximiser l'accumulation de biomasse et la couverture végétale. Cependant, la date de semis peut être prolongée jusqu'en mai si les pluies sont en retard. En moyenne, le Mucuna produit entre 2-10 t ha -1 de matière sèche et entre 200-2 000 kg ha -1 de grains (Cook et al., 2005). Il était particulièrement Niébé (Vigna unguiculata) se développe et mûrit dans une période de 60 à 80 jours (Kamara et al., 2018). Le niébé est une légumineuse à grains dont la biomasse est utilisée comme culture fourragère. Il tolère le stress et est adapté aux conditions climatiques variées. La valeur estimée du remplacement du niébé par des engrais azotés peut aller de 5 kg ha -1 (Carsky et al., 2001) à 80 kg N ha -1 (Horst & Hardter, 1997), en particulier après l'incorporation de résidus de niébé ou la culture de deux légumineuses au cours d'une même saison de campagne (Horst & Härdter, 1994). La culture intercalaire du niébé avec des cultures céréalières réduit souvent les rendements en légumineuses en raison de l'ombrage des cultures céréalières (Olufajo et Sigh, 2002). Cependant, une bonne performance est obtenue lorsque des variétés de niébé à couverture étalée sont cultivées par rapport aux variétés érigées (Ewansiha et al., 2014).Arachide (Arachis hypogaea) est une légumineuse fixant l'azote, tolérante à la sécheresse et cultivée comme culture de rente au Bénin (MDR, 2000). Le stade de maturité des arachides varie entre 90 et 120 jours selon la variété plantée (Yao, 2015). La culture a une caractéristique d'autopollinisation, ce qui permet aux graines de rester viables pendant longtemps. Dans la zone IV du Bénin, les agriculteurs cultivent des arachides avec du sorgho, tandis que dans la zone III, la monoculture d'arachides est pratiquée en raison de l'inadéquation d'autres cultures due à l'invasion au Striga. Les producteurs d'arachide n'utilisent généralement pas d'engrais inorganiques ; cependant, la pourriture des gousses est évidente dans les sols pauvres en calcium, ce qui réduit le remplissage et les rendements des gousses (MDR, 2000).Stylo (Stylosanthes hamata) est une légumineuse vivace principalement cultivée pour le fourrage du bétail. Il est bien adopté dans les régions de moins de 1 500m d'altitude et des précipitations entre 500 et 2 000 mm (Cook et al., 2005). La culture est tolérante à la sécheresse et peut bien fonctionner dans des sols peu fertiles (Jones et al., 2003). En moyenne, S. hamata produit environ 1-6 t ha -1 de matière sèche et 50-500 kg ha -1 de grains. Des études ont montré que la jachère de S. hamata améliorait de 50 -100% les rendements en grains des cultures céréalières subséquentes et fixait plus de 100 kg N ha -1 par an (Sanginga et al., 1996) (Saïdou et al., 2003). Malgré la carence en nutriments signalée dans la majorité des terres arables, l'utilisation d'engrais inorganiques est principalement limitée à la production de coton. En effet, le coton est la principale culture de rente du Bénin qui a été stimulée par l'intervention de l'État dans la plupart des régions du pays (Saidou et al., 2012;Honfoga, 2018). Au Bénin, le maïs est à la fois une culture de rente et de subsistance. Cependant, les engrais appliqués au maïs sont marginaux et proviennent d'effets résiduels dans les rotations coton-céréales (Saidou et al., 2012). Cela pourrait être attribué au fait que les prix du marché des cultures vivrières sont inférieurs aux dépenses engagées pour l'achat d'engrais (Ivo, 2008). La réaction des cultures à l'application d'engrais est également imprévisible, ce qui réduit leur utilisation par les agriculteurs pauvres en ressources (Honfoga, 2018). En outre, l'approche de la révolution verte axée sur le marché a mis l'accent sur l'utilisation d'engrais inorganiques. Pourtant, les crédits aux agriculteurs ne permettent pas l'utilisation de la gestion de la fertilité des sols spécifique au site et l'adoption de mécanismes développés pour la réponse au risque (Bellwood-Howard, 2014). Ainsi, une intensification agricole durable n'a pas été atteinte.Au Bénin, la production de culture est principalement une activité de subsistance pratiquée dans les systèmes agricoles traditionnels (par exemple, la culture itinérante), où les intrants faibles tels que l'utilisation d'outils traditionnels, les engrais et l'irrigation sont prédominants (Mulindabigwi, 2006). La culture arable est pratiquée dans les régions du sud, du centre et du nord (Manyong et al., 1996) Outre cette insuffisance générale des sols au Bénin, il faut ajouter que ceux de la zone soudano-guinéenne, des savanes, ont plus de contraintes physiques au développement (Igue et al., 2013). Leur dégradation s'accélère dès leur culture, il faut donc les exploiter avec plus de délicatesse en mettant en oeuvre des mesures de conservation adaptées (Azontondé, 1991). Les principales causes de dégradation des sols au Bénin sont notamment les suivantes : mauvaises pratiques agricoles, défrichement des terres marginales pour la culture, transformation du charbon de bois, surpâturage et destruction de la biomasse par des feux de brousse ou des incendies récurrents (Baba et al., 2016). L'érosion des sols est une menace majeure pour la production agricole et a entraîné une réduction d'environ 72% du rendement des cultures (Ziervogel et al., 2006).Comme dans le cas de la dégradation des terres, les problèmes de régime foncier et de sécurité ne sont pas suffisamment pris en compte par les services de recherche et de vulgarisation (Igue et al., 2000). L'incertitude entourant la sécurité foncière réduit la confiance des agriculteurs dans les avantages à long terme des investissements réalisés dans l'amélioration des terres. Au contraire, l'augmentation de la sécurité d'occupation des terres entraînerait pour les agriculteurs un accès à des crédits favorisant non seulement des investissements plus importants dans les intrants à court terme, mais également de plus grands investissements dans les technologies de conservation et de gestion des terres (Saïdou et al., 2007).L'utilisation des périodes de jachère dans la gestion des cultures améliore l'accumulation de matière organique, ce qui contribue à restaurer progressivement la fertilité du sol. Cependant, la population croissante et la pauvreté grandissante obligent les producteurs à réduire les périodes de jachère sans reconstituer les sols par l'application d'autres stratégies d'amélioration des sols (Brabant et al., 1996). En outre, les changements d'utilisation des sols qui ne sont pas souvent accompagnés de mesures de protection et de réhabilitation ont également accéléré la dégradation des sols.L'utilisation des légumineuses en tant que CCEV présente les avantages suivants : (1) elles enrichissent le sol en azote (N 2 ) biologique fixé, (2) conservent et recyclent les éléments nutritifs du sol, (3) assurent la protection du sol afin de réduire l'érosion et (4) nécessitent peu ou pas d'engrais minéraux immédiats. Cependant, à intervalle planifié, le travail du sol est nécessaire pour soutenir l'établissement, la maintenance et l'incorporation de ces engrais verts (Franzluebbers et al., 1998 ;Groot et al., 1998).Les sols dans le sud et le centre du Bénin ont une très faible capacité d'échange cationique (Igue et al., de cajou. Les cultures vivrières sont principalement intercalées tandis que le palmier à huile et le coton sont généralement en monocultures. Les champs éloignés sont utilisés pour la culture du coton et du maïs dans un système de jachère arbustive (Manyong et al., 2000). L'élevage de bétail dans la région implique la pratique du pâturage libre dans les champs après la récolte de la culture principale.Sur les sols ferralitiques, deux systèmes de gestion différents ont été développés pour l'intégration du Mucuna dans les systèmes de culture (Manyong et al., 2000). L'une est une culture de couverture en jachère unique pour les champs gravement dégradés. La seconde est une culture de relais maïs/ Mucuna pour les champs nécessitant moins de réhabilitation. Pour les champs gravement dégradés et infestés par Imperata cylindrica, Mucuna doit être planté en peuplement pur au début de la saison des pluies. Trois ou quatre semaines après la plantation du Mucuna, une seconde coupe peut être nécessaire pour permettre aux plants de Mucuna de vaincre Imperata cylindrica car il s'agit d'une mauvaise herbe à croissance rapide. Une production de matière sèche de 7 à 9 t / ha est généralement observée dans la zone de pluie bimodale (Vissoh et al., 1998). À la saison sèche, Mucuna achève son cycle de vie en laissant un paillis épais exempt de mauvaises herbes. Cela permet une récolte ultérieure du maïs pendant la longue saison des pluies avec peu ou pas de préparation ou de désherbage.Centre Bénin : zone caractérisée par une pression foncière due à une immigration continue en provenance du sud, entraînant la déforestation des forêts primaires et la conversion en terres agricoles pour la culture du coton, de l'arachide et du maïs. Par exemple, le système de culture basé sur l'igname dans les collines (Savè) a entraîné la déforestation de la forêt de Boukou. La culture du coton est également en expansion ; le niébé étant sa culture complémentaire. De grandes quantités d'engrais et d'autres intrants sont utilisées (Minot et Daniels, 2005). L'élevage de bétail dans la région par les pasteurs, en particulier le pâturage libre après la récolte de la culture principale, compromet l'adoption des CCEV, comme le Mucuna en jachère, entraînant des conflits entre agriculteurs et éleveurs.Nord Bénin : la région se caractérise également par une densité de population inférieure à celle des autres zones (Callo -Concha et al., 2012). Les systèmes de production sont basés soit sur le coton, soit sur la production animale. La production de coton a reçu beaucoup de soutien du gouvernement. Cependant, la production animale est bien établie et intégrée aux activités agricoles arables. La demande accrue de champs arables a entraîné l'ouverture de plus de terres dans les zones conservées. Cela a réduit le nombre de zones de pâturage conduisant au surpâturage, ce qui a poussé les éleveurs à envahir les terres cultivées, provoquant ainsi des conflits persistants dans l'utilisation des terres (Callo Concha et al., 2012). D'autre part, la demande nonsatisfaite de terres arables a raccourci les périodes de jachère, ce qui a entraîné une culture continueLes engrais verts et les cultures de couverture au Bénin -informations tirées de la revue littéraire, de l'évaluation agronomique et de la modélisation de la durabilité des systèmes de culture menant à l'aggravement de la dégradation des terres (Igue et al., 2000). Environ 75% des agriculteurs du nord du Bénin utilisent des engrais inorganiques pour certaines cultures, la rentabilité étant obtenue principalement dans les systèmes irrigués (Laube, 2007).Les Wennink et al., 1999), qui se retrouve également dans toute la région soudano-sahélienne (Pieri, 1989 ;McIntire et al., 1992 ;Jabbar, 1994). Les pratiques les plus couramment utilisées dans les différentes combinaisons sont la rotation des cultures, le stockage en rotation directe, le paillage, les intrantsLes zones ont été choisies en raison de la faible fertilité du sol et des critères suivants :d'engrais minéraux ou organiques sous forme de fumier ou de compost, l'utilisation de plantes de couverture.L'évolution des pratiques et stratégies de gestion de la fertilité des sols met en évidence leur importance pour la question de la gestion durable des sols. La diversité des pratiques reflète également l'adaptation des agriculteurs aux nouvelles situations, ainsi que l'insuffisance des solutions apportées par la recherche et la vulgarisation. Les terres en jachère, l'incorporation de la biomasse de légumineuses, la couverture du sol, la fertilisation organique et minérale et la rotation des cultures sont les types de pratiques qui ont lieu dans toutes les régions. Toutefois, l'intensité d'utilisation des pratiques varie en fonction de la pression foncière, de l'importance de la culture du coton, des spécificités de chaque zone agro-écologique. Les pratiques sont plus diversifiées lorsque la pression foncière est plus forte et que la jachère disparaît. La diversification des pratiques se fait également en fonction du niveau d'intégration de l'agriculture et de l'élevage à la ferme (Floquet et al., 2006).Dans les zones où la pression foncière est relativement faible, les résidus de récolte ne sont pas utilisés pour la gestion de la fertilité du sol. Par contre, dans les zones où la pression foncière est élevée, les champs de paillage avec des résidus de récolte, suivis ou non d'un pâturage en rotation directe, contribuent au maintien de la fertilité du sol. ProSOL (par le biais de la GIZ) est l'un des différents projets SEWOH qui promeut la protection et la restauration des sols pour renforcer la sécurité alimentaire au Bénin. Ses objectifs principaux incluent : la mise en oeuvre de la réhabilitation des sols, l'intégration de la GDT aux niveaux politique et institutionnel et l'amélioration de la gestion et de la diffusion des connaissances en GDT (Mulindabigwi, 2015). En ciblant les petits exploitants agricoles, ProSOL travaille dans 4 départements, dont 18 communes et 385 villages (Figure 2). Après l'achèvement de divers projets sur les CCEV au Bénin, le niveau d'adoption de ces cultures a diminué pour diverses raisons. Les principaux défis étaient les suivants : 1) un accès limité aux semences certifiées en raison d'une mauvaise organisation du système de semences; 2) une diversité réduite et une connaissance limitée de la productivité selon les régions agro-écologiques qui ont entrainé la réduction des taux d'adoption (ProSOL-GIZ, 2015); 3) le régime foncier et la difficulté d'intégrer les cultures à cycle long, telles que le manioc et l'igname dans les CCEV (Agbokou et al., 2015); 4) une forte demande de main-d'oeuvre pour la maintenance; et 5) un faible accès au crédit et aux intrants agricoles (Assogba et al., 2017).Selon Vissoh (2006), les facteurs les plus importants influençant l'adoption des CCEV par les agriculteurs sont : l'infestation par les mauvaises herbes, les droits fonciers, le contact avec les services de vulgarisation et d'autres variables spécifiques à l'exploitation. Par contre, Adégbola et al. (2011) ont montré que les principaux facteurs qui influencent positivement la décision d'adoption par les producteurs sont : le niveau d'éducation formelle, le contact avec les agents de vulgarisation et l'orientation du marché. De même, la participation volontaire des bénéficiaires aux actions de formation est un facteur qui influence positivement l'adoption des technologies CCEV (Jasaw et al., 2014). En outre, le genre et le nombre de parcelles sous cultures, le nombre d'actifs agricoles, et l'appartenance à un groupe de vulgarisation motivent les producteurs à utiliser les CCEV (Diogo et al., 2018b ;Gbédjissokpa et al., 2018). Cependant, en raison de la variabilité climatique et des risques (Agossou et al., 2012), il devient impérieux que les producteurs utilisent des cultures de couverture pour garantir la gestion durable de leurs terres. Ainsi, la sensibilisation des producteurs à la dégradation des sols (Jasaw et al., 2014) Considérations tardives du genre: les projets n'intègrent souvent pas la dimension de genre lors de leur phase de conception (Assogba et al., 2017). En outre, la prise en compte du genre varie selon les différents projets. Cela se traduit par l'implication des femmes dans les activités de production, de transformation et de commercialisation ou dans l'extension des technologies de GDT en tant que productrices modèles et détentrices des parcelles de démonstration.Milieu social: après un grand enthousiasme, l'utilisation de cultures de couverture au Bénin a montré des limites dans l'acceptabilité de ces technologies par les agriculteurs (Seguy & Bouzinac, 2001). Souvent, le manque de rentabilité économique directe empêche leur adoption dans un système agricole plus intensif. L'agriculteur voit rarement la conservation de la fertilité à long terme comme un facteur de changement (Messerli & Kistler, 1999). D'autres intérêts doivent être créés pour éliminer les préjugés.Pauvreté: les travaux de Leach et Mearns (1992) ont établi un lien de causalité théorique entre la pauvreté et l'état de dégradation de l'environnement. On peut donc se demander si les agriculteurs pauvres dégradent l'environnement des zones cultivées et adoptent moins de pratiques de jachère améliorée avec des légumineuses. La théorie a été appliquée à la situation particulière du Bénin. L'objectif principal était de déterminer l'influence du bien-être des agriculteurs sur leurs systèmes de production et leur adoption de l'agroforesterie : les cas de Mucuna pruriens et d'Acacia auriculiformis au sud du Bénin (Houngbo et al., 2012). Il a été démontré que, plus les agriculteurs sont pauvres, moins ils adoptent le Mucuna et plus ils exportent des nutriments du sol sans aucune stratégie de remplacement. Bien que les agriculteurs soient conscients des effets positifs des CCEV, leur taux d'adoption est généralement faible.Les agriculteurs les plus pauvres adoptent moins de technologie que tous les autres agriculteurs.La pauvreté apparaît comme un obstacle décisif à l'adoption des CCEV au sud du Bénin en particulier et au Bénin en général (Floquet, 1998). La réduction de la pauvreté est donc nécessaire pour améliorer l'adoption de pratiques agricoles durables au Bénin. Cette lutte peut passer par la valorisation des semences par les producteurs. L'établissement d'une chaîne de valeur autour de la production de semences pourrait être une alternative.Régime foncier: pour la plupart des populations rurales des pays en développement, mis à part la population active, la terre est le principal facteur de production et reste souvent le seul actif avec lequel la richesse peut être générée et développée (Vendryes, 2014). La question de la sécurité foncière est souvent identifiée dans les documents de stratégie pour la réduction de la pauvreté comme un axe majeur de la promotion de la croissance agricole et donc de la réduction de la pauvreté. Cette vision repose sur des raisons théoriques selon lesquelles la sécurité d'occupation favorise l'investissement agricole, l'accès au crédit (parce que les terres peuvent servir de garantie), l'adoption de pratiques de gestion durable de la fertilité des sols et la productivité agricole (Abdulai et al., 2011).Contexte CCEV: chaque CCEV a des situations spécifiques dans lesquelles il peut être adopté et celles-ci doivent être identifiées en tant que condition préalable. Pour les arbustes légumineux et les herbacées comme le Mucuna, ils ont été identifiés comme : production secondaire par la culture de couverture, forte pression des mauvaises herbes à traiter, sol suffisamment riche pour supporter les cultures principales et secondaires, réduction du temps de travail et réponse positive de la culture principale à la culture de couverture (Carsky et al., 2001 ;Schulz et al., 2001 ;Hauser et al., 2002).Les 2015). Les sols appartiennent à la classe des sols ferrugineux tropicaux (Viennot, 1978). La végétation correspond à celle de la savane arborée soudanoguinéenne.La Le tableau 4 présente la répartition du nombre de producteurs ayant participé aux essais en milieu réel.Tableau 4: Répartition des essais par commune, culture et type de CCEV Deux catégories de matériel végétal ont été utilisées dans ces essais : les (CCEV) (Eilitta et al., 1983). Le potassium (K) et le phosphore (P) sont des minéraux très présents dans la biomasse de Mucuna (Eilitta et al., 1983). Ces auteurs ont trouvé respectivement 6,6 kg/ha, 6,2 kg/ha et 5,5 kg/ha de P chez les variétés cochinchinensis, deeringiana et nagaland au sud du Mexique.Le pois d'Angole (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh) est une plante qui appartient à la famille des Fabaceae (Wu et al., 2009). C'est une importante légumineuse à graine cultivée sous les tropiques, y compris les zones semi-arides. Sa production annuelle, estimée en moyenne à 3,1 millions de tonnes, représente environ 5% de la production mondiale des légumineuses à graines. Avec cette production, le pois d'Angole est la sixième légumineuse à graine la plus importante du monde (Pazhamala et al., 2015) Source : Fiches descriptives des variétés de cotonnier (Gossypium hirsutum)La pratique proposée aux agricultueurs est : NPKSB coton 14/18/18/6/1 et le NPKSBZn maïs 13/17/17/0,5/6/1,5 utilisés à la dose de 150 kg/ha 15 jours après semis, puis l'urée 46% à la dose de 50 kg/ha apporté 45 jours après semis.Le dispositif expérimental est fait d'une parcelle de 10m x 10m, conformément au protocole élaboré par CIAT (Figure 5). À ce dispositif, il a été ajouté 4 parcelles de 4m x 4m de dimensions pour les quatre traitements de l'essai (2 sur parcelles de précédent de CCEV et 2 sur parcelles sans précédent de CCEV) (Tableau 6). Les engrais verts et les cultures de couverture au Bénin -informations tirées de la revue littéraire, de l'évaluation agronomique et de la modélisation de la durabilité des systèmes de culture Tableau 6: Description des traitements de l'essai Les résultats de l'analyse des sols ont été soumis à une analyse de variance à deux critères pour l'ensemble de l'étude. P value 0,000 0,000 0, 000 ddl = degré de liberté.Les faibles valeurs de l'azote total observées correspondent aux caractéristiques des sols ferrugineux tropicaux (Sanchez & Jama, 2002) qui couvrent 60% du Bénin et se retrouvent dans les communes de Bantè, Bembéréké et Kandi (Agossou, 1983). Ces sols sont reconnus pauvres en azote et en phosphore et une stratégie palliative passe forcément par une gestion rationnelle des terres agricoles (Igué et al., 2017). La rotation CCEV-maïs a amélioré la matière organique du sol dans la plupart des communes. La matière organique représente l'indicateur principal et déterminant de l'activité biologique (Mrabet et al., 2012) Le travail du sol est l'une des principales composantes des systèmes de cultures. Il permet entre autres de créer une structure propice (Schmidt et al., 1994) en vue de favoriser l'enracinement et assurer ainsi un bon ancrage, une bonne alimentation en eau et en nutriments des cultures en palliant aux difficultés liées au tassement des sols qui entraînent une diminution de l'espace des vides entre les éléments du sol, et une augmentation de la densité apparente du sol (Lipiec et al., 1991). L'état de compaction du sol traduit donc la résistance du sol à la pénétration qui peut également dépendre de la structure du sol. La compaction est un problème particulièrement important pour la gestion des sols, car elle influence la structure du sol (Batey, 2009). Nos résultats montrent que le tassement du sol est élevé à Zagnanado et est caractérisé par un sol ferralitique de très faible fertilité (Adjanohoun et al., 2006), surtout sur 10 et 15 cm comparé à Bantè (Figure 6). La même tendance est observée à Bembéréré comparé à Kandi (Figure 7). Les principales causes du tassement du sol sont liées directement ou indirectement au développement de la mécanisation. La cause indirecte est l'appauvrissement du sol en matière organique, dû à certaines modifications des pratiques culturales (N' Guessan et al., 2015). La matière organique est très faible sur les parcelles sans CCEV à Zagnanado, de l'ordre de 0,43% passant à plus du double (0,92%) sous l'effet des CCEV. Ceci explique donc la réduction de la compaction du sol constatée sur les parcelles avec CCEV. Ces observations sont en accord avec les résultats de Fikri et al. (2004) qui ont affirmé que la matière organique a une influence majeure sur les propriétés physiques et chimiques des sols et par ricochet sur le rendement des cultures. Les valeurs moyennes calculées pour la conductivité hydraulique des parcelles étudiées sont représentées par les figures 8 et 9. Les résultats montrent une variabilité de la conductivité hydraulique (K) en fonction des systèmes de cultures. Les parcelles sans CCEV ont montré des valeurs de K faibles indiquant une faible infiltration de l'eau dans le sol. Au niveau de Kandi (Figure 8) et Bantè (Figure 9), les valeurs de K enregistrées sont significativement plus élevées sur parcelles de CCEV par rapport aux parcelles sans CCEV.En général, la conductivité hydraulique augmente de 33-51% sur les parcelles traitées aux CCEV au centre (Figure 9) contre 29-66% sur les mêmes parcelles au nord, comparativement aux parcelles sans CCEV (Figure 8)La perméabilité d'un sol est sa capacité à faire infiltrer l'eau. Elle dépend de la texture du sol et de sa structure (homogène, fissures, etc.) des propriétés du fluide qui s'écoule (Viscosité, densité) et du dégré de saturation du sol (Nimmo et al., 1987). Plus un milieu est perméable (grand K), plus l'eau s'y infiltre. Un sol est considéré comme imperméable lorsque le coefficient K est inférieur à 10 -8 m/s. À l'inverse, au-delà de 5.10 -5 m/s, le sol est considéré comme très perméable et son aptitude à l'infiltration est excellente. ). La faible teneur en matière organique relevée dans les parcelles sans CCEV à Zagnanado à également favorisé la compaction de celles-ci (Naitormbaide et al., 2012). La compaction entraîne donc l'augmentation de la densité apparente du sol et de la diminution de la conductivité hydraulique (Håkansson & Reeder, 1994). La couvertureLes engrais verts et les cultures de couverture au Bénin -informations tirées de la revue littéraire, de l'évaluation agronomique et de la modélisation de la durabilité des systèmes de culture végétale est un facteur important et l'utilisation de plantes légumineuses contribue à limiter l'érosion, le ruissellement, le taux d'évaporation ainsi que l'augmentation de la capacité de rétention des sols (Roose, 2015), permettant ainsi une bonne gestion des sols pour une production durable. La plupart des sols compactés et imperméabilisés ne sont plus en état de remplir correctement leurs fonctions environnementales, en particulier celles qui ont trait à l'infiltration de l'eau et à la croissance des végétaux. C'est ce qui expliquerait les faibles récoltes obtenues sur les parcelles sans précédent de CCEV sur les différents sites étudiés.Les résultats de l'analyse de variance pour le facteur aléatoire et les facteurs fixes pour les deux cultures sont consignés dans le tableau 8.Le coefficient de corrélation intra-classe obtenu à partir du modèle vide était de 0% (inférieure à 50%) indiquait un effet non significatif du bloc sur le rendement des deux cultures quelques soit la commune.L'étude des facteurs simples et de leurs interactions sur le rendement des deux cultures tests indique une différence significative entre les différents facteurs et leurs combinaisons au seuil de 5% (Tableau 8). La commune a un effet très significatif sur les deux cultures traduisant les différences de fertilité des sols entre les quatre zones agroécologiques étudiées. Le précédent cultural représenté par les CCEV a un effet hautement significatif (p = 0,000) sur le rendement du maïs et du coton. Le traitement, également, a un effet hautement significatif (p = 0,000) sur le rendement des deux cultures. Les combinaisons des facteurs pris deux à deux ont eu des effets hautement significatifs sur le rendement du coton, alors que sur le maïs seule la combinaison commune : précédent a eu d'effets significatifs (Tableau 8).Les résultats sur les rendements en grains de maïs et de coton fibre montrent qu'il existe des différences très significatives (p = 0,003) pour les effets de la combinaison des trois facteurs sur le rendement du maïs, alors que sur celui du coton on observe une différence hautement significative (p = 0,000) au seuil de probabilité de 5 % (Tableau 8).La rotation CCEV maïs ou CCEV coton a amélioré de façon significative le rendement en grains du maïs et du coton fibre en fonction des traitements et des 10). Sur le coton, la rotation plante améliorante coton a amélioré de façon significative le rendement du coton avec un rendement moyen en coton fibre sur parcelle de plantes de couverture plus élevé (1 142 kg/ha) avec apport de la demi dose d'engrais minéral recommandée ; ce rendement est triplé comparé aux parcelles sans plantes de couverture dans la commune de Bantè (Figure 11). Ces résultats corroborent ceux de Ziadi et al. (2006) qui ont montré que la limitation en élément azoté est la principale contrainte de la production des céréales en Afrique sub-Saharienne. Toutefois, il n'est complètement valorisé que si les quantités de P et K disponibles sont suffisantes, d'où la nécessité de la complémentation de la fumure minérale sur les parcelles de CCEV qui se sont soldées par un accroissement de rendement de 700 kg/ha pour le maïs à Kandi et de 2 000 kg pour le coton à Bantè. La dégradation des sols constitue une menace sérieuse pour la production alimentaire et les moyens de subsistance ruraux en Afrique subsaharienne (Bindraban et al., 2012 ;Obalum et al., 2012 ;Gomiero, 2016). Des pratiques agricoles non-durables ont entraîné une baisse de la fertilité des sols en raison de l'épuisement des nutriments -en des carences en azote (N) et en phosphore (P), de l'érosion éolienne et hydrique, et finalement de la baisse de la productivité agricole (Dessie & Mohammed, 2018).L'initiative spéciale du BMZ SEWOH s'attaque à certains des plus grands défis auxquels l'humanité est confrontée aujourd'hui. L'objectif de SEWOH est de contribuer de manière significative à l'accroissement de la sécurité alimentaire en réduisant la faim et la pauvreté, en mettant l'accent sur le développement rural et la modernisation de l'agriculture (Mulindabigwi, 2015). SEWOH comprend une gamme de programmes mondiaux mis en oeuvre par GIZ dans dix pays. L'un des programmes mondiaux est le programme mondial ProSOL, qui est opérationnel au Bénin, au Burkina Faso, en Éthiopie, au Kenya et en Inde. Il vise à aider les pays partenaires à mettre en oeuvre à grande échelle des approches testées sur le terrain pour la conservation des sols et la réhabilitation des sols dégradés. Parallèlement, l'objectif est d'améliorer le cadre décisionnel en vue de mettre en place des incitations à une utilisation durable des sols. Pour soutenir ces activités, le programme soutient l'échange et la diffusion des enseignements tirés des pays partenaires de manière systématique. Les CCEV font partie du portefeuille de technologies promues pour la protection et l'amélioration des sols, en particulier au Kenya et au Bénin.Les CCEV sont des cultures qui protègent les sols de l'érosion éolienne et hydrique, suppriment les mauvaises herbes, fixent l'azote atmosphérique, les récupèrent, renforcent la structure du sol, réduisent la formation de croûtes à la surface, améliorent l'infiltration d'eau, réduisent la compaction du sol, améliorent sa qualité et éliminent les insectes nuisibles. Les avantages de ces cultures dépendent de la productivité de la biomasse avant que le sol ne soit préparé pour la prochaine culture. Lorsque les cultures de couverture sont enfouies et labourées dans le sol, les engrais verts ajoutés améliorent la fertilité et la structure du sol en nourrissant les populations microbiennes du sol, et collent également les particules du sol pour former des agrégats de sol (Cherr et al., 2006 ;Florentín et al., 2011). Lorsque les microbes du sol décomposent les matières végétales, celles-ci se minéralisent et libèrent de l'azote et d'autres nutriments dans le sol. L'accumulation et la libération d'azote sont plus importantes avec les légumineuses qui contiennent des bactéries qui fixent l'azote dans les racines (Cassman, 2003).Un cadre et un outil d'évaluation permettant de comparer systématiquement les systèmes de culture existants aux systèmes agro-économiques et environnementaux existants sont nécessaires. La fertilisation, la minéralisation de l'azote et le rendement final des cultures sont tous affectés non seulement par la gestion des cultures individuelles, mais également par les processus à long terme influencés par la séquence des cultures et l'interaction entre les différentes cultures (Baddeley et al., 2017 ;Reckling et al., 2016). En outre, l'intensification durable (ID) est devenue un paradigme important visant à améliorer la productivité tout en garantissant la durabilité de l'environnement. Il faut produire plus de nourriture, de fibres et de fourrages avec moins de ressources -par exemple, en augmentant les rendements par unité de terre, d'eau ou d'engrais (Giller et al., 2011 ;Descheemaeker et al., 2016 ;Falconnier et al., 2017) CROSST a été développé dans une feuille de calcul Microsoft Excel (version 365) en utilisant le code de programmation Visual Basic pour Application (VBA). Le code source utilisé pour construire le modèle peut être trouvé ici. C'est un modèle statique qui capture les effets annuels cumulés de certains systèmes de culture sur trois ans (au bout de six saisons). Le résultat de l'outil est constitué de graphiques à barres, de graphiques de compromis et de scores relatifs. CROSST est composé d'une feuille d'entrée, d'une feuille de sortie et de neuf feuilles de paramètres et de calcul (Figure 12).Le premier nom de la feuille, Page de sélection de la CSA (Agriculture soutenue par la communauté, Community-Supported Agriculture en anglais), permet aux utilisateurs de choisir le système de culture qu'ils analysent et de saisir les données nécessaires à leur mise en place.Le deuxième nom de la feuille, Sorties, donne un résumé de tous les résultats.La troisième feuille jusqu'à la onzième feuille contient les feuilles de paramètres et de calcul. Ce sont des feuilles cachées et ne sont accessibles qu'aux utilisateurs les plus avancés, par exemple pour améliorer les informations relatives à la production agricole dans une région donnée.Pour chaque pays et zone, un système conventionnel a été comparé à un système amélioré avec CCEV intégré pour illustrer le fonctionnement de l'outil. Les données ont été recueillies lors d'entretiens avec des experts clé, d'une revue littéraire et de discussions de groupe.Le Bénin couvre une superficie de 114 763 kilomètres carrés, dont 32,8% sont utilisés pour l'agriculture. Le secteur agricole au Bénin est une source importante de richesse économique puisqu'il contribue à 30% du total du produit intérieur brut (INSAE, 2015). Les principales cultures produites au Bénin comprennent le maïs, le haricot, le riz, les arachides, les noix de cajou, les ananas, le manioc, l'igname, d'autres tubercules, ainsi que des fruits et légumes cultivés pour la subsistance locale et pour la vente. Le coton est la principale culture de rente et est principalement exporté. Les autres cultures exportées comprennent les noix de cajou, les noix de karité et le beurre de karité, les ananas, les produits à base de palme, ainsi que du cacao et du café (FAO, ICRISAT, CIAT et CCAFS, 2018). Le programme GIZ-ProSOL fonctionne actuellement dans quatre zones : Alibori et Borgou au nord et Collines et Zou au sud (Figures 13 et 14). Ces départements ont été choisis en raison du niveau élevé de dégradation des sols (ProSOL, 2016b, Figure 14). Située au nord du Bénin, cette région a une saison de culture par an avec des précipitations annuelles de 800-1 200 mm. Le système de production est mixte-élevage et la taille moyenne des exploitations est de 5 à 7 ha. Les sols sont tropicaux ferrugineux sur une base cristalline avec une forte proportion de sols lessivés et peu de concrétions. Le coton est une culture de rente importante dans la région (Tableaux 1 et 3, section 2).Lors des visites de sites et des discussions de groupe avec les agriculteurs de la région, la perte de la fertilité des sols semblait être un problème majeur. La pratique conventionnelle consiste en une monoculture de coton avec rotation du soja (Tableau 11, Figure 15) comprenant la combustion des résidus de récolte et l'application d'engrais minéraux à la dose recommandée de 150 kg d'engrais/ha de NPK (14-23-14). Le marché du coton est bien développé et les agriculteurs reçoivent généralement des intrants tels que des engrais et des semences d'usines. Des déductions de ces intrants ont lieu lorsque les agriculteurs sont payés (CIAT, 2018a). Un aperçu du système de culture est présenté dans le tableau 11. Cette étude vise à identifier les Cultures de Couverture et d'Engrais Vert (CCEV) prometteurs et leur intégration dans les systèmes de culture au Bénin.Dans un premier temps, une revue bibliographique a été réalisée, un profil des systèmes de production intégrant les CCEV a été réalisé et analysé, le niveau de connaissance des producteurs par rapport aux CCEV et les différents modes d'intégration des CCEV dans les systèmes de culture ont été abordés. Les effets des CCEV sur les propriétés physico-chimiques du sol et sur l'amélioration des rendements des cultures de maïs et de coton sont prometteurs et incitent à une vulgarisation rapprochée de ces CCEV pour le bénéfice des producteurs.Au niveau des connaissances des agriculteurs sur les CCEV, il ressort que plusieurs CCEV ont été introduits, mais deux sont plus connues et utilisées par les agriculteurs pour améliorer la fertilité des sols et contribuer à l'alimentation des animaux en période sèche (Cajanus cajan et Mucuna). Le Cajanus cajan est souvent produit en association avec différentes cultures vivrières, tandis que le Mucuna est cultivé en monoculture. Selon les agriculteurs, le Mucuna est utilisé pour réveiller le sol lorsqu'il devient improductif. Il existe plusieurs variantes d'association des CCEV avec les cultures.Dans la commune de Bantè, l'association Cajanus cajan avec le maïs dans le même paquet est réalisée le même jour de semis du maïs à la première saison. Ceci permet de laisser la CCEV se développer après la récolte de la culture principale. Dans d'autres communes, le Cajanus cajan est utilisé en parcellisation ou en association installée après la dernière application de l'herbicide. La pratique de l'herbicide est généralisée à toutes les communes du fait du manque de main d'oeuvre agricole pour les travaux d'entretien des parcelles. Au nombre des contraintes abordées par les agriculteurs figurent en bonne place la disponibilité des semences des CCEV.Les effets des CCEV sur les cultures de maïs et de coton ont montré qu'ils permettent, à eux seuls, d'obtenir des rendements sensiblement égaux à la pratique vulgarisée et que l'apport complémentaire de 50% (de la pratique vulgarisée) d'engrais minéraux permet de tripler les rendements. Ces résultats sont très satisfaisants et méritent d'être développés dans d'autres communautés. De l'estimation des écarts de rendement, il ressort que l'adoption des CCEV permettra d'augmenter le profit des agriculteurs et par conséquent leurs revenus. Ce gain de revenu va induire l'accroissement des dépenses totales des ménages et particulièrement les dépenses de santé et de scolarisation des enfants. Cela va favoriser l'amélioration des conditions de vie des ménages adoptants et par conséquent une réduction de la pauvreté.Rolf Sommer/ Alliance of Bioversity International and CIATLes engrais verts et les cultures de couverture au Bénin -informations tirées de la revue littéraire, de l'évaluation agronomique et de la modélisation de la durabilité des systèmes de cultureLes résultats issus de cette étude confirment le potentiel et le rôle de l'utilisation des CCEV dans l'amélioration de la fertilité des sols et ses retombés potentiels sur le bien-être des ménages. Les CCEV peuvent être utilisées comme un instrument efficace de lutte contre la perte de la fertilité des sols, l'insécurité alimentaire et la pauvreté au Bénin.L'intégration des CCEV dans les systèmes de culture grâce au ProSOL a permis aux agriculteurs de satisfaire aux besoins alimentaires et non-alimentaires de leurs familles grâce au revenu que cela leur procure sans aucune nuisance sur leur santé et leur environnement immédiat. Elles ont également rayonné dans leur milieu ; ce qui a permis à plusieurs de leurs pairs d'opter pour ces types de culture.Au terme de cette étude, il ressort que les CCEV sont indispensables à l'amélioration de la fertilité des sols et qu'elles peuvent contribuer à assumer le rôle attendu de tout temps de l'agriculture : assurer la durabilité des systèmes de production, la sécurité alimentaire et nutritionnelle des peuples, etc. Plusieurs producteurs rencontrés ont reconnu et démontré que l'intégration des CCEV peut, si elles sont intégrées dans une politique nationale de développement, devenir un facteur de grande réussite pour l'agriculture familiale. L'état béninois devra créer le cadre institutionnel et développer des partenariats public-privé dans ce sens pour investir dans la création des banques de semences pour les CCEV. Aussi, il devra accompagner les producteurs qui introduiront des CCEV dans leur système de production par des subventions en intrants."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2009919542.json b/main/part_2/2009919542.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6c04ac1c075147cb99f9263e4f0e858469f432c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2009919542.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7773b96d58292226df757369bca9e8a8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/99471b4b-c61a-4348-9576-1f076534c08b/retrieve","id":"1169475749"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"92373fa2-1f1b-4541-9a4b-27dfd5d2417d","content":"• Flexible approach that allows for discovery • Simple, intuitive models serve as good communications tools for underlying concepts • Bring diverse information together to be tested as for biological coherence • Choose between strategy options or identify new options • Involve beneficiaries and decision-makers from the outset."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2013212024.json b/main/part_2/2013212024.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5410a3db0ef923cf450dd03dd02b095add835621 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2013212024.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"de1b7b7d7afeeaf1799e9be2e20db0c2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c4e3ff91-43b7-435e-a0f7-01f07b670b27/retrieve","id":"-997424673"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"04fe3d36-87b4-44df-8e93-a8e5454243b3","content":"A fundamental principle of CCAFS from its inception is that we work from the bottom up, co-developing and evaluating appropriate technologies and practices with farmers in participatory approaches. In 2011, we established benchmark sites for joint fieldwork in three regions (East and West Africa and South Asia), and initiated a program of action research that would allow multi-location, long-term and communitybased trialing of holistic portfolios of adaptation options. Designed to learn about the social, cultural, economic and institutional processes of adaptation and mitigation, and to support the design of implementation strategies, the Benchmark sites quickly led to the emergence of the concept of Climate-Smart Villages (CSVs). Borne out of India's states of Punjab and Bihar (CCAFS Annual Report 2011), this new concept started in 2012, and stresses aspects related to: the multistakeholder partnership involved, the focus on maximizing synergies across a portfolio of tailored technical and institutional climate-smart agricultural interventions and the need to associate local innovation with scaling-up processes. CSVs are envisioned as \"models\" of local actions that enhance productivity, increase incomes, achieve climate resilience and enable climate mitigation (CCAFS Brochure 2013). In the CCAFS Extension Phase (2015-2016), with the transition into an outcome focused agricultural research for development (AR4D) initiative, the CSVs were integrated into the CCAFS Theory of Change and Regional Impact pathways as mechanism to roll out and scale CSA via policy processes, development programs and support networks. Through Phase I the establishment of the network of 18 CSVs across the 5 CCAFS target regions (South East Asia and Latin America been added in 2014) has been a success. A common global framework and vision was strengthened (CCAFS, 2016) and the concept is now being taken up by other agencies (e.g. governments of Maharashtra State in India, Nepal, Philippines and Myanmar). As of end of 2017, a total of 35 AR4D CSVs have been established and are being actively managed by CCAFS and partners, covering 20 countries across all 5 CCAFS priority regions.Along this positive evolution, however, the CSV concept has also fueled important (internal and external) discussions, self-reflections and learnings in the context of its use in AR4D. This document summarizes some key learnings, structured around the Concept itself and its implementation. It illustrates some of the major successes (Scientific Outputs and Outcome Stories) and highlights some recommendations to be applied in Phase II Learning Platform (LP2) Rationale CCAFS has developed the Climate-Smart Village (CSV) approach as a means to address the need for proven and effective location-specific CSA options in the context of climate change, seeking to fill knowledge gaps and stimulate their scaling. Evidence is needed on which options generate CSA-related outcomes, where the options should be targeted, the costs involved, their expected co-benefits or trade-offs with other outcomes. Research in CSVs revolve around understanding the relative synergies and trade-offs of different CSA portfolios in terms of productivity, adaptation and mitigation outcomes and their contextdependencies, the gender, social and nutrition dimensions of promising CSA options, and which might be the most successful scaling-up strategies and processes.Learnings on the Concept that led to the shared principles  Three major principles of the AR4D CSV Vision have been defined:  CSVs are founded on the principles of participatory action research for grounding research on appropriate and location/context-specific enabling conditions  CSVs focus on generating greater evidence of CSA effectiveness in a real-life setting and  CSVs facilitate the co-development of scaling mechanisms towards landscapes, subnational and national levels The CSVs theory of change combines complementary bottom-up and top-down, science led approaches. The concept of CSV is a set of processes that leads to wide adoption of CSA practices.The actual technologies are secondary to this. CSV are testing grounds set up with the specific goal of building robust science-based evidence around Climate-Smart Agricultural Portfolios supporting their integration into government policies/plans and the development of scaling/leverage mechanisms.On the CSV scale \"One size does not fit all\": Whilst benchmark sites were defined as 10x10km blocks, this thinking evolved into including landscapes and broader areas. The CSV scale aims to represent a manageable unit with similar conditions based on biophysical, socio-economicpolitical context and is dependent on the CSA options being tested and the research questions being addressed. The geographic scope therefore varies in the different regions.Local rules: Whilst there is a common AR4D CSV model, context-specific TOC, implementation and scaling up mechanisms are needed to be successful. While there is a common model among the different regions made up of a set of replicable processes aiming to build solid evidence that leads to enable wide CSA adoption, implementation and scaling modalities are shaped by local characteristics, conditions and opportunities.The goal of a CSV must be to enable scaling out of successful CSA intervention/processes coming out from the collaborative research and not of the AR4D CSV approach.CSVs can understand and promote autonomous adaptation, but also must consider systemic and transformative options. The participatory nature of CSVs tends to promote autonomous, farmer driven adaptation, but many of the successes have occurred when systemic or transformative options are brought into local contexts and adapted to local conditions through participatory approaches.The AR4D CSV approach carried out across the CCAFS sites differs from the \"Climate-Smart Villages\" promoted by several governments or development partners. Rather that replicating the full research focused approach, building on the science based evidence provided, they promote and scale specific CSA options/portfolios embedding them e.g in local development policies or plans.  Don't forget to measure. Many of the early participatory approaches used qualitative approaches to understand farmer perspectives and the adaptation process. However, much of the scaling out strategies require quantitative evidence on costs/benefits, hence strong data collection is needed to support scale out. Recommendations to be considered into Phase II implementation. To identify early wins in which a significant impact opportunity is supported by a sound science case. This could involve the fast tracking of a small number of priority case studies in which the scientific evidence base for key practice change or policy change actions is demonstrated.  Wherever possible, drawn into the design and evaluation of farm level CSA technologies and practices the expertise of CGIAR and partners in relevant \"agri-food systems\"  Strengthen a framework for analysis and CSA metrics (ongoing development of the CSV Monitoring plan enabling more breakdown of evidence around the three pillars)  Strengthen the focus on inclusive business-led development and value chain approacheseither directly or via linkages and partnerships to other activities  Use CSVs to derive knowledge for guiding major agricultural investments; rather than only as lighthouses for local development.  Concentrate resources on CSVs likely to deliver high level outcomes through scale out. With dwindling budget, resources should be concentrated on sites where there is multi-level institutional buy in if any outcome or impact is to be expected.During Phase I the research around the CSV AR4D approach was designed to provide research outputs and outcomes.South Asia  Scaling climate-smart dairy practices and husbandry practices disseminated among members of 6 producers' organizations comprising 600 000 farmers, 25% of whom are women in Kenya  Supporting Heifer International in animal fodder options thus helping reach 179,000 families and increasing their earnings by a collective $131 million in Kenya.In  Colombian MoA and MoE will include the CSV approach as a mechanism to implement the Climate Change Integral Plan for the Agricultural Sector which is being currently updated by FAO."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2020052977.json b/main/part_2/2020052977.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5db23ba9a336068064d94f9191cca2838624ab3e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2020052977.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b6483ce860b01421cab95fd678a72682","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d9cc321b-449c-4bad-856f-ecb1bda3f133/retrieve","id":"2031455124"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c4dc100b-d733-465c-aa8b-285513d025b9","content":"*Aquaculture production in Ghana has been rapidly growing (Fig. 1), is the fastest-growing in Africa (Fig. 2), and now the second largest tilapia producer in Africa, next to Egypt. • To understand the processes and strategies of encouraging women's entrepreneurship • To analyze the impact of women's entrepreneurship on their empowerment ..... in the context of emerging aquaculture value chains in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), particularly GhanaData sources:• 3 rounds of household surveys with 700 fish-producing household in 7 major producing regions in Ghana (June 2019, 2020, 2022) • Modified Abbreviated Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (A-WEAI) • 11 in-depth interviews with women aqua-entrepreneurs and 5 focus group discussions (with about 5-8 women non-aqua-entrepreneurs) conducted in June to July 2021• Content analysis of the interviews and FGD transcriptions • Descriptive/comparative profitability analysis • Regression analysis Women make up 8-10% of seed, feed, and fish producers and dominate in processing and trading • Gender norms and barriers to entry:\"fish farming is a men's job\" and \"fish processing and marketing are women's job\"\"The public perceives that fish farming is a male job and women are not considered as fit to join associations.\"\"You may have issues at home if your husband is not in agreement with you in fish farming.\"• Fish farming added to women's time burden:\"The public perceives fish farming to be time consuming, so it is not for women who have to take care of the family.\" \"You will have problems at home if you don't have someone who takes care of family, children, food, and household chores.\"\"When one is very much occupied with domestic chores, one can forget to feed the fish.\"\"At times, you do not get much time for our family because much time is spent on the fish farming business.\"• Support from male: Women aqua-entrepreneurs have support from husband, son, or male relative.• Role of resources: Women aqua-entrepreneurs have resources to invest, reinvest and diversify enterprises (e.g., land, water source, and capital)• Role of ICT and information: Women aqua-entrepreneurs got the idea of starting fish farming from social media, video, or radio, complemented by FC extension agents• There are barriers to women's entry in aquaculture, but ones they enter, there is no difference (access to resources, practices, production).• Women-led aquafarms are as equally productive and profitable as men-led aquafarms Many of the women respondents also mentioned the empowering effect of their fish farming• \"It brings respect and knowledge to women.\"• \"Women become more brave, confident, and empowered.\"• \"Women become more financially independent.\"• \"It brings publicity, exposure and respect in the community. It keeps women active and busy; fish farming is a good form of exercise.\"There are mixed experiences in terms of time and effort needed for aquaculture compared to other livelihoods.• Most women respondents said fish farming was very stressful and required a lot of time, although one said it was \"less stressful, and not much time needed, especially when you can hire labor to help out.\"• Many women respondents thought fish farming was a good income source, although one mentioned that it was capital-intensive and \"it feels you always have to spend a lot of money.\"• \"Compared to poultry farming I think fish farming is better because it is flexible in terms of feeding, care, risk and cost. I only feed them but with poultry I have to change the water and wash the troughs, feed them daily, give them antibiotic which is much involving for me as a woman compared to fish farming. • High level of empowerment among female and male aquaentrepreneurs• Female aqua-entrepreneurs were already empowered to begin with; and have become more empowered through aquaculture• High level of empowerment of male spouse of female aqua-entrepreneurs• Low level of empowerment of female spouses of male aqua-entrepreneurs• Female spouses are disempowered mainly through lack of group membership; control over use of income, and inputs to productive decisions• Across all respondents, the lack of group membership is the main contributor to disempowerment• Varied experiences in terms of time flexibility and time burden related to fish farming, other livelihoods, and household chores/careWomen non-aqua-entrepreneurs' perception on fish farming• Perception on fish farming: Fish farming is attractive to most male youth interviewed but less attractive to women; fish processing was more attractive for women (based on FGDs).• Of 5 FGDs (30 women participants), only 5 women participants were interested in fish farming; most were interested in fish processing• Varied experience and preference of female spouses in fish-producing households in terms of their involvement in fish farming to help improve household income• 59% of female spouses of male aqua-entrepreneurs would like to be more involved in fish farming and are interested in training/skills development related to fish farming"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2028192623.json b/main/part_2/2028192623.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83b60b94de8fe362cde2a67c663e00c714416f9a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2028192623.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"96654c94270e8459a22f0e66edb9888b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6c0531d6-0510-460d-b75d-4a8cebe24ba0/retrieve","id":"-381643408"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"df397c2c-9f86-4cb9-a348-a5c719134647","content":"Sparse genetic testcrossing being applied on stage 1 in 2022 ( EAPP1 and SAPP1) that allow us to estimate BLUP GCA to further reducing the breeding cycle 660 DH lines from heterotic group A divided into three groups and crossed with one of the three testers Tester Group 1 (165 DH lines) Group 2 (165 DH) Group 3 (165 DH) CKDHL0500/CML543 Yes No No CML566/CML607B No Yes No CML444/CML546 No No Yes 540 DH lines from heterotic group B divided into three groups and crossed with one of the three testers Group 1 (180) Group 2 (180) Group 3 (180) 604A/CML539 Yes No No CKDHL120423/CKLTI0344 No Yes No CML568/CML572 No No YesExpected changes in mean between the full population of lines versus a selected top 20% the lines using index. Spearman correlation between observed and predicted line-breeding value (n=50). Set 1 line crossed with all testers, set 2-4 lines crossed with one tester, predicted with the other two testers.Genomic selection using test half-predict-half strategy -incorporating pedigree "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2028321351.json b/main/part_2/2028321351.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..383bbd3279127cdd01ce67e07dda632dfa6d470a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2028321351.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7e8766f77cf3ee8821fce954db58aeee","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8fa3acc6-9e91-4616-94ee-5adc31d2de5a/retrieve","id":"763826782"},"keywords":["Biological control","entomophagy","nest mate recognition","weaver ant colony production","Oecophylla longinoda"],"sieverID":"667c65ac-607a-4029-b38a-62be3523a709","content":"Oecophylla ants are currently used for biological control in fruit plantations in Australia, Asia and Africa and for protein production in Asia. To further improve the technology and implement it on a large scale, effective and fast production of live colonies is desirable. Early colony development may be artificially boosted via the use of multiple queens (pleometrosis) and/or by adoption of foreign pupae in developing colonies. In the present experiments, we tested if multiple queens and transplantation of pupae could boost growth in young Oecophylla longinoda colonies. We found out that colonies with two queens artificially placed in the same nest, all perished due to queen fighting, suggesting that pleometrosis is not used by O. longinoda in Benin. In contrast, pupae transplantation resulted in highly increased growth rates, as pupae were readily adopted by the queens and showed high survival rates (mean = 92%). Within the 50-day experiment the total number of individuals in colonies with 50 and 100 pupae transplanted, increased with 169 and 387%, respectively, compared to colonies receiving no pupae. This increase was both due to the individuals added in the form of pupae but also due to an increased per capita brood production by the resident queen, triggered by the adopted pupae. Thus pupae transplantation may be used to shorten the time it takes to produce weaver ant colonies in ant nurseries, and may in this way facilitate the implementation of weaver ant biocontrol in West Africa.The arboreal weaver ants (Oecophylla smaragdina and O. longinoda) are territorial and prevent intruders from accessing their nests. They forage for arthropod prey including many different insect pests in the canopy of their host trees (Way & Khoo, 1992;Peng & Christian, 2006;Van Mele, 2008). According to Dejean (1991) a colony with 12 nests can capture approximately 45,000 prey items per year and may in this way suppress insect pest populations. of crops such as cashew nuts (Peng et al., 1995;Peng et al., 2004), citrus (Barzman et al., 1996) and mango (Sinzogan et al., 2008;Peng & Christian, 2005b). Therefore, Oecophylla is increasingly being utilized as a substitute to synthetic chemical pesticides as they are often equally or even more efficient in controlling pests and at the same time cheaper to use.Several recent studies on applied weaver ant research have been carried out in Asia and Australia on O. smaragdina, however, the life history and the behavior of the African O. longinoda is less well documented. Emerging markets for organic and sustainably-managed African fruit (mango, citrus) and nut (cashew) products (Van Mele & Vayssières, 2007) asks for more research and investment in O. longinoda in West Africa, as also here the economic potential is high. For example, Dwomoh et al. (2009) showed that O. longi-noda can be used to control pest hemipterans as effectively as insecticides in Ghanaian cashew plantation and were able to increase yields four-fold compared to plots without any control measures.On top of the high potential as a biocontrol agent, Oecophylla is also used as a commercial food product (Sribandit et al., 2008) -a tradition especially well developed in Thailand and other Southeast Asian countries (Van Huis et al., 2013). The double utilization of the ants has led to an increasing interest in the development of Oecophylla management. For the effective implementation of Oecophylla ants in pest management and ant farming, several aspects need to be considered.It is difficult to collect a queenright colony since the queen nest is well hidden in less accessible places (Peng et al., 1998). Established \"wild\" ant colonies produce several winged queens (flying ants) each year, which individually leave their colony and start new colonies alone. However, under natural circumstances, the mortality of these queens is high (> 99%) and they are therefore difficult to obtain. Furthermore, it takes, for the few survivors, approximately 2 years before their colony contains enough ants to be used for pest control (Vanderplank, 1960;Peng et al., 2004) or for ant larvae production (Offenberg & Wiwatwitaya, 2010). So far all implementation has been based on collection of wild colonies or natural establishment in orchards which also takes several years (Peng et al., 2005a).Therefore, to make the Oecophylla technology accessible to non-specialists and to implement it on a large scale, cheap production of live colonies in ant nurseries is needed. Artificial rearing of colonies from newly mated queens may lead to a stable and quick production of Oecophylla colonies (Krag et al., 2010) and improve the chances of a wide implementation.For an effective production of live weaver ant colonies in ant nurseries faster growth of young colonies is desired. Two different ways may be used to boost early colony growth. Firstly, Oecophylla (Peeters & Andersen, 1989) and other ant species (Bernasconi & Strassmann, 1999) are known to found new colonies with multiple queens (pleometrosis) in order to increase the probability of survival during the initial phase of colony development via a faster production of more workers. Secondly, the adoption of non-nestmate brood from other colonies may increase colony growth as several ant species are known to rob intraspecific brood from neighbor colonies and in this way accelerate colony growth by adding these robbed individuals to their worker force (Bartz & Hölldobler, 1982;Rissing & Pollock, 1987).It is not known if O. longinoda uses pleometrosis during colony founding nor is it known if they accept and adopt pupae transplanted from foreign colonies. In this study we tested if more than one queen could be merged in founding colonies of O. longinoda (pleometrosis) and we tested the effect of pupae transplantation on the growth of newly founded colonies.In a mango plantation in the Parakou area (09° 37' 01\"N/02° 67' 08\"E) of Benin 54 O. longinoda queens were collected after their nuptial flight with the use of artificial nests during the wet season in 2012. Artificial nests were made on 15 mango trees by rolling a single leaf together, fixing it with a plastic ring (1.3 cm in diameter) in the middle part and sealing the tip end with a paper clip. Nests were colonized by founding queens right after their nuptial flight as they constitute safe nesting sites (J. Offenberg, unpublished data). Nests were inspected 2-3 times a week and all queens were collected 1-3 days after their mating flight. At this developmental stage all colonies were composed of a single queen and her eggs, as no pleometrotic founded colonies were found. After collection, the queens and eggs were put into open cylindrical transparent plastic containers (Φ = 4.5 cm; height = 10.5 cm) with a mango leaf inside to increase humidity and sealed with mesh nylon materials at the open end.The brood transplantation experiment was divided into two sub-experiments; one where queens were kept individually with their brood and transplanted pupae, and a second where two queens were artificially merged into one colony to test for pleometrosis, as has been observed for O. smaragdina (Peeters & Andersen 1989;Offenberg et al., 2012a;Offenberg et al., 2012b).In the first experiment with single queen colonies, 30 fertilized queens were used, which were divided into three pupae transplantation treatments with 0 (control), 50 or 100 non-nestmate pupae being transplanted to each colony, resulting in 10 replicates per treatment. In the first six replicates pupae were transplanted to the queens 7-14 days after they were collected in the field whereas in the last four replicates, pupae transplantation took place the day after they were collected. Every time a new queen was collected in the field, it was sequentially allocated to one of the three treatments (i.e. the first mated queen no transplantation, the next 50 pupae transplantation, the third 100 pupae transplantation etc.).In the second experiment with two queens per colony, colonies were divided into two pupae transplantation treatments with 0 (control) or 50 non nestmate pupae being transplanted, respectively, and with five replicates per treatment (= 20 queens in total). In both experiments transplanted nonnestmate pupae were obtained from a single mature O. longinoda colony. During transplantation, each colony was transferred to a cylindrical transparent plastic vial (Φ = 8 cm and height = 5 cm) with a mango leaf and the relevant number of pupae placed inside the vial. All colonies were kept at ambient temperature ranging between 24.3 °C and 29.7 °C (mean 27.5 °C) on a table protected from intruding ants by placing each table leg in a tray with water. During the experiment, all colonies were provided a few drops of pure water every day to allow the queens to drink. After the emergence of the first imago workers drops of 20% sucrose water were provided to each colony every day. One week after emergence of imago workers, protein food in the form of canned cat food and fish was provided to all colonies ad libitum.The transparent plastic containers allowed daily inspection and counting of brood in their different developmental stages. The numbers of intrinsic eggs, larvae, pupae and imago workers (defined as the brood produced by the resident queens) and adopted workers, were counted 50 days after the pupae transplantation in all the colonies. At this point all adopted pupae and the oldest intrinsic brood had developed into imago workers. However, intrinsic imagines could be distinguished from adopted individuals due to the size difference between the pupae from the mature colony and the much smaller nanitic workers produced by the founding queens (Porter & Tschinkel, 1986;Peng et al., 2004). Based on the number of live adopted imago workers, the survival rate from transplanted pupae into imago workers was calculated [(no. of emerged workers / no. of transplanted pupae) x 100] and mean numbers of brood and pupae survival were compared with ANOVAs using JMP 8.0.1 statistical software. Due to the difference in the number of days from queens were collected until pupae were transplanted, the total number of days from queen collection until the experiment was terminated (50 days after pupae transplantation) was recorded for each colony and used as a covariate in the subsequent analyses.In the single queen experiment the survival from transplanted pupae into imago workers ranged between 88 and 96% (mean % survival and SD = 92.05 and 2.52) and was not significantly affected by transplantation rate (mean % survival and SD, 50 pupae = 92.4 and 2.45, 100 pupae = 91.7 and 2.66; ANOVA including development time as a co-factor, F (2, 17) = 1.1; p = 0.36) indicating that non-nestmate pupae were readily accepted by the queens and suggesting that pupae required no or only minimal amount of nursing.Fifty days after the transplantation, intrinsic imago workers were present in all colonies, however, with significantly more individuals in colonies with more pupae transplanted (F (2,26) = 147.1, p < 0.0001). The mean (SD) number of intrinsic workers was 31.2 (4.37), 44.8 (3.04) and 74.5 (8.25) in the colonies that received 0, 50 and 100 pupae, respectively (Table 1). Pupae transplantation also led to increased production of the remaining developmental stages of intrinsic brood. This was true both for the number of eggs, larvae, pupae, workers and their sum (p < 0.0001 in all cases) at the end of the experiment (Table 1). The average total intrinsic production in colonies without added pupae was 46.5 (6.33) individuals during the first 50 days of colony development. In comparison, 50 pupae transplantation led to a 70 % increase in the per capita queen production, and a 100 pupae transplantation led to 190% increase compared with no pupae transplantation (Fig 1). Thus, the transplanted pupae stimulated the fertilized queen's egg production and increased her brood production with approximately 1.4 and 1.9% per adopted pupae, respectively.In addition, the total colony size (all intrinsic brood plus adopted workers) was 46.5 (6.33), 125.2 (11.01) and 226.7 (15.32), respectively, in the colonies that received 0, 50 and 100 pupae. In comparison to the treatment without pupae transplantation, the total number of individuals increased 169% with 50 transplanted pupae and 387% with 100 transplanted pupae (Fig. 1). Thus, adopted workers led to a considerably increase in total colony size.In the second experiment with two queens in each colony, one of the queens, in all cases, killed the other before the emergence of imago workers from the transplanted pupae, suggesting that pleometrosis induced in the laboratory is not possible. It should, however, be noticed that we found 5 claustral colonies with two queens out of a total of 87 collected in 2013 (all the others being singly founded)(I. Ouagoussounon, Table 1: Mean (± SD) number of intrinsic brood (egg, larvae, pupae, imago workers and their total) produced by the resident queen in the colonies 50 days after the transplantation of pupae. unpublished data), suggesting that pleometrosis is sometimes used under natural conditions as also described by (Dejean et al.,2007). Because all queens were involved in fatal fights, no further analyses were conducted on this experiment.The results showed no difference in survival between queens receiving 50 pupae and queens receiving 100. Pupae in both treatments were readily accepted by the queen ants and more than 88% were reared to the imago stage. This means that potentially colonies may be boosted with even higher numbers of pupae and boosting can take place before the emergence of the first workers as a worker force is not needed for nursing. Offenberg et al. (2012b) and Peng et al. (2013) obtained similar results with a mean survival rate of 84%, when transplanting 30 and 60 non-nestmate pupae to O. smaragdina queens in Darwin, Australia. Also in that case survival was unaffected by transplantation rate. The same pattern may not hold true if larvae were transplanted instead of pupae as they need to be fed and groomed by members of the receiver colony. Larvae may well be accepted by receiver colonies, as described by Krag et al. (2010) for O. smaragdina, however, it is questionable if they can be added in high numbers as with pupae, because of their need for food, which is available in only limited amounts, especially in very young colonies with only a single queen and no worker force. A further advantage to colonies adopting pupae from mature colonies derives from the fact that young ant colonies, in order to reserve resources, produce only smaller and slimmer workers (nanitics) with an associated narrow task repertoire compared to older and larger colonies that produce larger major workers (Peng et al., 2004). After pupae transplantation the workers eclosing from the transplanted pupae are of a larger size as they originated from a mature colony. As a consequence these transplanted individuals may conduct wider tasks compared to the nanitic imago workers intrinsic to the young colonies. If larvae were transplanted these may turn into smaller imagines due to food shortage if they are transplanted prior to the determination point of their final size. This is not the case with pupae as they have already attained their final size. Krag et al. (2010) showed that O. smaragdina nonnestmate larvae showed chemical insignificance (i.e. were without colony specific odor) as they were adopted by colonies containing mature workers (but no queens). Subsequently it was found that also O. smaragdina pupae seems to be chemical insignificant and that the presence of queens in the colonies did not hinder adoption of foreign brood as transplanted pupae developed into imagines in queenright colonies (Offenberg et al., 2012b). From the present study we conclude that the same holds true for O. longinoda suggesting that chemical significance does not develop until beyond the pupal stage as also suggested by Lenoir et al. (2001), to be the case for other ant species. Also the present study shows that the presence of the maternal queen does not preclude adoption of foreign brood.The addition of pupae to the colonies did not only increase colony size with the numbers added. In addition, the transplantation of pupae stimulated the fertilized queen´s own egg production and thereby increased the intrinsic brood production of the colonies. Thus, the presence of brood at the pupal stage (or beyond), increased egg laying rates. This seems to be adaptive to queens as younger brood is associated with expenditures to the queens in terms of nursing time and food allocation, whereas pupae will soon eclose and develop into workers that can take over the nursing of brood and forage for food. This result follows the findings by Gibson & Scott (1990) and Offenberg et al. (2012b), showing that pupae increased egg laying in Camponotus spp. and O. smaragdina queens, respectively. On the other hand, other researchers have shown that only the number of late stage larvae is responsible for queen fertility in e.g. Monomorium pharaonis and Solenopsis invicta (Tschinkel, 1988;Børgesen & Jensen, 1995;Cassill & Vinson, 2007). This suggests that different mechanisms may operate in different ant species. Further, the triggering of an increased fecundity in the present study shows that egg laying rates in O. longinoda are plastic and can be manipulated via the presence of pupae and/or workers.In the present study, the total population size (all brood stages) in the colonies that received 0 pupae was 1.99 times higher (mean = 46.5 ± 3.6 SE) compared to the results obtained by Offenberg et al. (2012a) in the hapleometrotic colonies of O. smaragdina (mean = 23.3 ± 2.0 SE) after 68 days. This lower production in O. smaragdina was likely affected by the fact that the colonies in that study were transported under cold conditions at the start of the experiment which may have delayed their development. On the other hand, the total population size (all brood stages) after 68 days was 1.6 times higher in the pleometrotic O. smaragdina (Offenberg et al., 2012a) colonies (mean = 74.9 ± 10.5 SE) compared to the haplometrotic colonies in this study (mean = 46.5 ± 3.6 SE). This highlights the strong effect of multiple queens in founder colonies.Under natural circumstances, it takes approximately two years before a colony contains enough ants to be used for pest control (Vanderplank, 1960;Peng et al., 2004) as each colony is expected to occupy approximately 10 trees in the receiver plantation (Peng et al., 2004). This minimum colony size may be achieved more quickly by boosting the growth via pupae transplantation. In the present study colony size increased up to almost 5-fold in only 50 days and with only a single pupae transplantation event. Multiple transplantations with potentially even higher numbers of pupae being transplanted may lead to much higher boosting, considerably shortening the otherwise slow development to an acceptable colony size. Secondly, it is evident that the biological control efficiency of weaver ants depends on the density of the worker ants (Van Mele et al., 2007;Peng & Christian, 2005b, 2007). Thus, keeping high densities of O. longinoda is essential in biocontrol programs and may be accomplished by pupae transplantation during critical periods.This study suggests that queen right O. longinoda colonies accept foreign brood and that pupae transplantation facilitate colony growth. This knowledge may ease the implementation of the weaver ant technology in Africa where the ants can be used to control pest species on various crops. Future studies should test if the immediate presence of pupae will trigger higher egg-laying rate by the queen before the pupae emerge as workers. Also it would be interesting to test if pupae transplantation and the following higher numbers of larger workers will lead to the production of a larger intrinsic worker caste in receiver colonies compared to colonies that develops naturally."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2031359638.json b/main/part_2/2031359638.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4dc8c55c5d9ed1de9357c8b766292e6c99dcd03f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2031359638.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0e8dd355452d6dfdd042ac41e88c697e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9e11b491-8d1c-4b37-a288-6b4d08ade2e7/retrieve","id":"1909837888"},"keywords":["Vos","P.","Hogers","R.","Bleeker","M.","Reijans","M.","Van de Lee","T.","Hornes","A.","Pot","J.","Peleman","J.","Kuiper","M. and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23","4407-4414"],"sieverID":"42162f2f-3e9c-47b9-9bd4-0a2569a541b0","content":"El nivel de redundancia genética es mínimo en la colección colombiana de aguacate (una sóla accesión), lo cual facilita su manejo y utilización.El patrón de distribución continuo de la variabilidad genética de la colección colombiana de aguacate, posiblemente se deba a las actividades de mejoramiento y del manejo de las accesiones.El patrón de distribución continuo de variabilidad observado para la mayoría de los accesiones, cuestionan su designación racial/ecológica, la cual no se podria haber confirmado apriori.La variabilidad genética con alta similaridad presente en la colección colombiana de aguacate, recomienda que su diversidad genética sea incrementada, en especial, con alelos de interés para su mejoramiento. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2056217543.json b/main/part_2/2056217543.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..925055246345e1f5efa180ed471aa1b9279b5232 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2056217543.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"28bd83f5390c075b5b29e78922559e89","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d107b357-d546-4a5c-899b-99b3126591b3/retrieve","id":"184377408"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"94aaea0e-a854-40d0-ab54-e675ca6c7eb6","content":"Seasonal food availability calendars provide information that can be used to empower local communities to improve their access and utilisation of diverse foods all year round using locally available foods. This brief Community user guide was developed to assist nutrition and agricultural champions as they use seasonal food availability calendars in their communities. The calendars showcasing locally available foods were participatory and developed with community members in Malaita, Solomon Islands, within the framework of the \"Melanesia Rural Market and Innovation Driven (MERMAID) programme by World Vision and the Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT).1 Agrobiodiversity: The diversity of crops and their wild relatives, trees, animals, and other species, that contribute to agricultural production and food provision.A diverse diet is important for nutrition and health. Consuming a diet with a variety of food groups has several nutrition and health benefits as it increases the likelihood of meeting the body's requirements for adequate growth, repair, maintenance, and health. The major food groups include starchy staples, such as grains, roots and tubers, and plantains; animal and plant protein-rich foods such as pulses, nuts, meat, poultry, fish, dairy, eggs; vegetables, and fruits. Within each food group, there is also a wide range of local foods that could be consumed, each providing additional value to one's diet. While the basic principles of what makes up a healthy diet remain the same, the exact composition of a healthy and diverse diet varies depending on individual characteristics, the cultural context, dietary customs, and the locally available foods.The availability of different foods is one of the factors that influence consumption of a diverse diet. Foods are largely available from the landscape, production system and markets that one can access. Seasonality is an important factor that determines food availability, especially when considering perishable foods like fruits and vegetables, and within farming communities. The locally available foods (local agrobiodiversity 1 ) can be used in ways that support and promote access to and consumption of diverse diets throughout the year.A seasonal food availability calendar documents seasonal variation and changes in the availability, abundance, and diversity of foods present in the landscape, including foods from local production, wild spaces, and markets. The calendars provide a basis to (i) develop other nutrition and agricultural materials and (ii) develop, guide, or conduct community activities that support the exchange and learning of knowledge and skills that facilitate the production, utilisation, consumption, and conservation of the locally available foods.Increase awareness of locally available nutrientdense 2 and underutilised foods 3 : This includes identifying and promoting foods that are nutrient-dense and can, therefore, make significant contributions to nutrition and health. It also includes identifying and promoting underutilised foods that contribute to healthy diets across the different seasons of the year. The seasonal food calendar showcases locally available foods to create awareness and promote healthy and diverse diets. This calendar was participatorily developed with members of Siwapo, Oau, Elliote, Maniache and Tauweiseu communities. Increase awareness of locally available foods: This includes creating an understanding of the variety of foods locally available from different sources, when they are available, how they can be accessed, their health and nutritional value and how they can be utilised.1 2 Nutrient-dense foods refer to foods that are rich in vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients important to our health and relatively few calories, fat, added sugars, and/or sodium.3 Underutilised crops refer to locally adapted crops that were used as traditional foods but are becoming increasingly neglected as more productive and demanded crops become available in farming systems. Neglected and underutilised species offer great opportunities to address malnutrition, hunger, and poverty. Incorporating them into farming systems could lead to nutrient-dense, climate-resilient, and sustainable agriculture.The seasonal food availability calendars can be used to inform and direct discussions that: Improve year-round access to diverse foods: This includes comparing the availability of food groups over the year with the seasonal availability of individual foods. This can reveal foods that may be useful in addressing seasonal gaps when key food groups (and nutrients) may be limited. When very few foods of a food group are available in a specific month, those that are available could be priorities for promotion to enhance dietary diversity at that time of year.Document knowledge about local agrobiodiversity and contribute to the monitoring or analysis of seasonality and food availability. Which includes locally grown crops, livestock adapted to local conditions, indigenous• What diversity is available within each of the groups? (Both cultivated and wild)• For the different food groups, how are we using the available diversity? (For food and non-food uses).• Which food groups (and food items) are most and least consumed? And why?• Which months have high and low diversity available?• For the different foods, what are the different varieties available?• For the different food groups and food that are available, how accessible/affordable are they for households in the community?• What foods are available to my household/community and where can they be sourced?• Which foods are available that I'm not fully utilising? (especially in lean periods when less foods are available/accessible/ affordable).• What actions do I need to take now, to ensure that my household has access to each key food group during the period of low availability (the lean periods).• Develop sample meals and diets using the calendar to show diverse diets (e.g., meals with the 3 groups (energy giving, body building, and body protecting foods) and at least 3-5 colours).4• Plan kitchen gardens or school gardens to show the locally available foods in the different seasons, equipping community members, students, and children with basics about agriculture, nutrition, and health.• Plan youth group activities around important wild foods.varieties, aquatic foods, and wild plants, animals and aquatic foods. Revisiting the calendars periodically, for example after every two years can provide insight on changes in seasonality and food availability that are related to climate change. Additionally, this process creates opportunities to discuss climate-smart agriculture and promote resilient plants and animals.The table presents examples of questions and sample actions that could be discussed with the communities, with reference to the seasonal food availability calendars. The discussions should be carefully planned, leveraging existing information and tailored to address the specific objectives and needs of the communities.5 Agrobiodiversity custodians are farmers who have maintained large numbers of crop landraces and species, are active in maintaining, adapting, and promoting local crop varieties and are conservationists.• Which months have high and low diversity available?• What foods are available in periods when more common foods are not readily available (lean periods or periods of low availability or high cost)?• What are the sources of foods during months of low availability?• What are the forage patterns and practices for collecting and using wild foods?• During months of high availability (months where the foods are highly abundant or common), how can the foods be processed, stored, preserved, or cooked to ensure they are consumed and are available for longer periods of time?• How can the availability of foods that are available in the lean periods be increased? (sourcing seeds, timely planting or harvesting, early or staggered planting, storage, community exchange, etc.).• Plan kitchen gardens or school gardens to showcase the local foods that are available during months of low availability.• Plan community actions to manage areas that contribute to food availability -community-managed forests, field margins.• What do the youth and children know about the local foods that are important for nutrition and culture? Do they consume these foods? (Especially nutrient-dense foods, underutilised foods, and foods available in the lean periods).• For the different food groups, how has the seasonality and level of food availability changed in the last 2 years?• For the different food groups, which foods are increasingly resilient -appear to withstand or adapt to challenging environmental conditions? (Especially nutrient-dense foods and foods available in the lean periods).• Plan activities for youth and children that share and promote the local, cultural and nutritional value and uses of different foods that also involve the elderly and agrobiodiversity custodians. 5• Develop sample healthy and diverse meals and diets using traditional foods from the farm and the wild.• Document the local knowledge about the use, value, and availability of underutilised foods (nutrition, health, culture, etc.).• Monitor the changes in seasons of availability of the different foods (due to climate change, due to the actions implemented to improve food availability, etc.).Nutrient-dense foods• Which months are nutrient-dense foods available and when are they least available?• What are the sources of the nutrient-dense foods? Especially during months of low availability.• How are the available nutrient-dense foods consumed and utilised?Underutilised foods• What food items/species are available when there is low availability of a food group?• Which food groups (and food items) are most and least consumed?• For food items that are available during the lean periods, how are they used for food? Are they widely consumed, why or why not?• During months of high availability (months where the foods are highly abundant or common), how can the foods be processed, stored, preserved, or cooked to ensure they are consumed and are available for longer periods of time and the nutrients in them are retained?• What are the different recipes that could include nutrientdense foods or underutilised foods? (In the home, for business, etc.).• What actions need to be taken to increase the availability of nutrient-dense foods or underutilised foods during months of low availability (sourcing seeds, timely planting or harvesting, storage, etc.).• Plan food fairs, recipe exchange activities, seed and production exchange activities for nutrient-dense foods or underutilised foods.• Plan kitchen gardens or school gardens to promote nutrientdense foods or underutilised foods."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2057203482.json b/main/part_2/2057203482.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c808f4c0a6da222108307b5e4fb6bb0b52e1a9bc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2057203482.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a4425def3336b90327d21f4ddc695739","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/SOF-2021-03E.pdf","id":"-1351285425"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8510ba06-0d3d-4b78-855d-ddd803fddd39","content":"There are usually seven stages to the production of timber or biomass from a plantation: seeds/ nurseries, planting/establishment, tending/management, harvesting and one or more stages of processing, transportation and marketing.Jobs and wealth are created at each node of the supply chain and costs are incurred. Various actors work at the different nodes, whether in a specific node or across the different nodes depending on a range of factors relating to: the legal/policy environment and institutional arrangements, support services, extension agents, service providers, inputs and financial institutions.Demand for wood is growing worldwide and this trend is set to accelerate through the remainder of the 21st century. This is the case not just for traditional markets, but for other sectors like construction (responsible for 36 percent of greenhouse gas emissions), bioenergy and green chemistry seeking to de-carbonize and go biobased in an effort to move into the emerging sustainable, green economy in which companies are located closer to their raw materials and local markets.This landscape offers more opportunities than threats for the forestry sector and sustainably managed wood products, which are carbon neutral by nature. But to harness these opportunities, the sector must be prepared to adapt, to rise to the challenges it faces and to fundamentally change the way it operates.Globally, the gap will widen between the production capacity of natural forests -whose size and productivity are inherently limited -and different types of forest plantations.Countries will therefore only be able to maintain their status as forestry economies (i.e. the sector accounts for a significant share of GDP) if they take decisive steps to develop their plantation activities. Much more generally, it would be a grave strategic error to assume that any sector could continue with business as usual in the coming years. This chapter of the latest edition of the State of the Forests of Central Africa focuses on forest plantations and agroforestry plantations intended for production. It does not discuss assisted natural regeneration, enrichment plantations or agro-industrial plantations (e.g. palm or rubber).Forest plantations are human-made forests grown from seeds or saplings for the purpose of producing wood or non-timber forest products (production plantations) or for boosting various types of ecosystem services (protection plantations).The term 'plantation' covers a broad continuum of techniques and situations, tailored to the specifics of the local context.From 1963 to 1986, the Congolese Industrial Afforestation Unit (UAIC) planted 25,000 ha with these two natural hybrids (yield = 12-20 m³/ha/year). From 1989 on, Congolaise de Développement Forestier (CDF), a subsidiary of Shell, funded UAIC to establish 17,000 ha of clonal plantations in Pointe-Noire. The plantations grew to cover 42,000 ha.The growth of a subsector with ECO s.a. : 1997-2001 In 1997, CDF merged with UAIC to create the company ECO s.a. (Eucalyptus du Congo s.a.). The company was active until 2001, with Shell as the majority shareholder and the Congolese Government as the minority shareholder.By 2001, ECO s.a. was a major economic player in the Republic of the Congo, employing 3,500 workers and generating a turnover of around XAF 15 billion.When the price of wood fell, ECO s.a. ran into financial difficulties. Its performance was unsatisfactory and bioenergy -Shell's real strategic target -was a long way from making its breakthrough, costing USD 20 per barrel.In June 2001, Shell exited ECO s.a. The Congolese Government took over Shell's shares for a symbolic amount and continued to honour the sales contracts agreed and complete replanting programmes while seeking another private sector partner.The plantations in Pointe-Noire, some of which are in peri-urban areas, were threatened by problems linked to urbanization, leading to persistent illegal logging affecting almost 10,000 hectares. A presidential decree designating areas for reforestation in the department of Kouilou somewhat alleviated the situation, which had been exacerbated by the fast growth of the city of Pointe-Noire. In 2005, the South African group Chartwell Carbon Ltd, replaced soon after by Canadian group MagIndustries, signed a long-term lease with the Republic of the Congo for a concession covering the 40,000 ha previously held by ECO s.a., 7,000 ha from the National Reforestation Service (SNR) and 20,000 ha from the extension zone.Eucalyptus Fibres Congo (EFC) was created to manage these 70,000 ha and positioned itself on the woodchip market given that there was little profit in prepared logs. Poles were still harvested from pines in Loudima (200 km from Pointe-Noire), but transporting them to the port in Pointe-Noire by rail was difficult and the road impassable. An XAF 16 billion woodchip factory was built in 2008 in the port, with an annual capacity of 500,000 tons. The Republic of the Congo is the first sub-Saharan African country to have a factory of this type.Weakened by the 2008 global economic crisis, which disrupted the international wood and wood products market, EFC was not able to get back on its feet.At the end of 2011, the Chinese Evergreen Holdings Group became the majority shareholder of MagIndustries, and EFC subsequently ceased almost all its operations until the groups' departure.At the end of 2016, the government signed a new long-term lease with the Moroccan group SOS NDD, which withdrew due to a lack of financing in 2017. Finally, Romanian group ZEBRA TESAF CONGO took over the 25,000 ha southern section of the forest in 2018, but little is known about the company's strategic intentions.In 2019, a long-term lease was signed between the Republic of the Congo and the company COFOR, a Congolese subsidiary of the French FRM group, covering almost 38,000 ha. This area forms the Madingo-Kayes Reforestation Area (PRMK) and comprises 8,000 ha of eucalyptus plantations, 6,000 ha of extension zone, natural forests and protected areas.Due to the degraded state and advanced age (10 to 30 years) of the eucalyptus plantations, it is necessary to implement several replanting and forest restoration strategies aligned with different strategic objectives.The PRMK forest management project led by COFOR has a number of objectives:• Regenerate the underdeveloped area around the plantation -where unemployment and rural depopulation take a heavy toll -by creating jobs on the plantations and increasing agricultural production within those areas assigned to agroforestry; • Reduce the deforestation and degradation of natural forests with a high biological value, which is mainly caused by shifting agriculture, wildfires and forest fires, and the production of charcoal from illegal wood; • Offer an alternative source of charcoal and timber, from sustainably managed plantations; • Support climate change mitigation efforts by dynamically managing plantations to sequester CO 2 and by reducing the risk of forest fires.The strategy for managing the forest is geared towards a multifunctional mosaic plantation made up of geographically coherent blocks organized into several new forests, nature reserves and agroforestry areas.New forests will be grown or regrown by implementing afforestation, reforestation and agroforestry techniques using different species (Acacia auriculiformis and mangium, Eucalyptus UxG and PF1).The commercial products produced by these forests are destined mainly for the local market (including fuelwood in the form of charcoal, timber in the form of veneer, plywood, engineered timber and electricity poles, and food crops).In 2020, COFOR launched a preliminary pilot to establish a tree nursery and an initial acacia agroforestry plantation. Implementation was delayed by the outbreak of Covid-19 and did not take place until 2021.In addition to the forests described above, tens of thousands of hectares have been planted across the Republic of the Congo by the National Reforestation Service (SNR) and the National Afforestation and Reforestation Programme (PRONAR), which now manage them. PRONAR is a robust policy initiative by the Government of the Republic of the Congo to launch, support and develop different types of plantations.It aims to promote forestry and agroforestry plantations, to encourage and support stakeholders to undertake afforestation and reforestation to supply national and international markets with timber and non-timber forest products (such as essential oils, resins, biofuels, honey, fruits, vegetables and medicinal plants).It seeks to relieve human pressure on natural forests by reducing deforestation, to develop land not suited to crop or animal farming, and to improve the country's supply of wood for manufacturing, construction, energy and industry. Feasibility studies for the programme were conducted with the support of international partners (World Bank and FAO). It aims to plant over 1 million ha of forest by implementing a range of components intended to mobilize public and private sector actors and rural communities (Lignafrica 2014).In contrast to the industrial success observed in South America and South Africa, which use similar technologies, the plantation forestry subsector has not grown as expected in the Republic of the Congo. This is the case despite the succession of managers, the large areas planted, high yields, the Congo's world-renowned experience in the sector (plant material, research and development, local know-how) and the proximity of the forests to the port of Pointe-Noire. The markets and subsectors are shown in the figure below.This situation can be explained by:• Proximity to a city that has doubled in population size over 15 years (600,000 to 1.2 million inhabitants); • Insecure land titles, an issue partially resolved by a presidential decree following long disruptions; • The lack of genuine product diversification and high dependence on the paper manufacturing sector, which has become very concentrated and highly competitive; • The lack or absence of industrial strategies on the part of various investors over the years.The withdrawal of Shell, which had many similar companies in its portfolio, was not directly tied to the context in the Republic of the Congo, but was rather a consequence of the strategic decision to exit the biomass energy segment, which was deemed too new in 2000. The 40,000-hectare forest will form a carbon sink that will sequester more than 10 million tons of CO 2 over 20 years and will be certified to international standards. The initiative, financed by Total, includes agroforestry farms (charcoal production and crop farming) and a carbon sink, with timber production, offering social, economic and environmental benefits.Planned to run until 2040, it will employ the selection cutting system to promote the natural regrowth of local species and supply Brazzaville and Kinshasa with sawnwood and plywood.The 50,000-hectare property will comprise:• 15,000 ha of infrastructure and protected areas, allowing sites with high biological value and patches of natural forests (gallery forests, slope forests) to recover and even expand in buffer zones.• 2,000 ha devoted to the agroforestry component with crops (cassava, etc.) grown between rows of acacia trees by local farmers.• 38,000 ha planted over 10 years under the carbon component, which combines carbon sinks and timber production. Over 20 years, 10 million tons of CO 2 will be sequestered and the growth will then be harvested annually and processed into timber. This forest will supply 160,000 m3 of wood per year for processing into three products: sawnwood, veneer and plywood. A biomass cogeneration plant will also be supplied with wood waste for electricity generation (and heat for drying) for nearby industrial facilities and villages.For more information see: https://www.makanisi.org/congo-une-foret-de-40-000-hadacaciasa-vocation-ecologique-et-agro-forestiere/?fbclid=IwAR0IySsogN63T0sGoK2_0UeGp J6hWB5C 6fGWTzc5dnAmQcEvijBwexnCTdEWith nearly 50 years of experience, a unique industrial heritage and large areas of savannah land available (few farms and few inhabitants), the Republic of the Congo has immense potential for the development of plantations.The monospecific, single product/market-oriented planting model, which prevents the land being used for other purposes, has also shown its limitations. Highly inclusive models that involve local people (beyond basic silvicultural operations) and target a range of markets, including local markets, are a much more promising, resilient and effective option, given that they are capable of generating multiple revenue streams from locally processed products simultaneously.The end of the globalized, highly concentrated and specialized fossil fuel model is set to disrupt economic activity and many industrial sectors. It offers many opportunities for local models that are integrated with modestly sized industrial hubs, located precisely at the source of decarbonized resources and serving mainly local markets.Agroforestry combines the time and/or space dedicated to trees with crops and/or livestock (agrosylvo-pastoralism) by optimizing the agronomic, ecological and economic synergies between the various components of the system. It has several benefits:• It enriches the soil with organic matter and nutrients;• It regulates and ensures the availability of water;• It protects against erosion;• It acts as a windbreak and shades crops; • It increases biodiversity;• It diversifies revenue streams.Among the many agroforestry models currently available, the 'sequential' agroforestry system (also called 'cyclical', 'productive tree fallow' or 'Taungya'), as opposed to the 'permanent' agroforestry system, has become the dominant model in Central Africa.Box 3.2: Problems related to slash-and-burn agriculture and the demand for charcoal on the Batéké plateau Shifting agriculture on cleared and burned land is the predominant model in Central Africa, whether in forested or savannah areas. It is relatively productive for a few years, but soil depletion drives farmers to move on to new land. This practice, together with the concomitant production of charcoal, is the main driver of deforestation.On sandy savannahs, it delivers only modest yields for 1 to 3 years, following which a fallow period of 5 to 10 years is needed to allow the soil to slowly recover.The Batéké plateau is made up of sandy savannahs fragmented by valleys, many of which are lined by gallery forests. They cover 12 million hectares from south-eastern Gabon to northeastern Angola, on both sides of the Congo River north of Brazzaville and Kinshasa.This ecosystem is characterized by a complex mosaic of savannah and forest. The consequences of slash-and-burn agriculture and charcoal production to supply the two capitals are dramatic, both for the equilibrium of the forest and for the food security of rural populations. Indeed, Kinshasa requires 2.14 million tons of charcoal each year (Dubiez et al. 2022) and Brazzaville more than 100,000 tons. The acacia-cassava agroforestry system developed in MampuTo meet the high demand for charcoal from Kinshasa, an innovative agroforestry system was designed and deployed on the Batéké plateau in the DRC in the 1980s, as part of the Mampu project. This system combined Australian acacias (mangium and auriculiformis), which have a natural capacity to enrich the soil and high-quality wood, with cassava, the main food crop.Under the supervision of the Hanns Seidel Foundation, this agricultural system, which performs well on poor savannah soils, was deployed over 8,000 hectares between 1987 and 1993 with the voluntary settlement of indigenous farming families from the wider region. The plantations were then divided into 25-hectare farms and allocated to independent farmers between 1995 and 2001.In sequential agroforestry systems, the crops (cassava, maize, peanuts, market garden produce, etc.) are planted at the same time as the acacia trees. They benefit from the way the land is prepared for planting (clearing and ploughing) and are farmed for the first two years in the spaces between the rows of trees.Acacia can be mixed with other trees, local species (Maesopsis, Pentaclethra, Milletia, Afrormosia, Terminalia) and even fruit trees. Beekeeping can also be introduced into this agroforestry system.From the third year, the plantation enters the 'productive tree fallow' phase for 5 to 6 years until the trees are harvested.A new agroforestry cycle then begins on the loosened soil, which is naturally weed free and enriched with nitrogen and organic matter, without the use of chemical products. The acacias are regrown by replanting or using controlled burning to activate dormant seeds present in the litter. Food crops are replanted between the rows of trees.Subdividing agroforestry estates into the same number of plots as years of the harvest cycle (for example 8 plots) has the benefit of ensuring that both food (1 to 2 out of 8 plots) and forest products (1 out of 8 plots) are both produced every year.The tree fallow system offers an effective alternative to the traditional bare fallow system in savannah areas. The period of natural soil restoration (but with regular burning) required by the latter is replaced by a productive period of tree growth that accelerates the enrichment of the soil with organic matter and nitrogen.The Mampu agroforestry system has proven effective. Three hundred farming families have been living on 25 hectares of acacia trees each for 20 years now, in a plantation zone that is home to several thousand people centred around a residential and commercial hub.One reason for the project's success is the incorporation of traditional slash-and-burn practices into the agroforestry system, allowing for the natural regeneration of the acacia trees. This technique, which farmers know well, has facilitated the adoption and therefore the sustainability of this agroforestry system.The Mampu project also has a major environmental dimension in that it replaces charcoal obtained via illegal logging -a major driver of deforestation around Kinshasa -with charcoal from sustainable plantations. Twenty years after the establishment of the plantation, Bisiaux et al. (2009) estimated that the area produces around 10,000 tons of charcoal annually, 10,000 tons of cassava, 1,200 tons of maize and various non-timber forest products, including 2 tons of honey.With an annual turnover of 10 percent of its initial investment, the project has also demonstrated its economic viability and its positive impact on social development. Mampu is now an autonomous peasant farming system. It does not rely on funding or support from international donors and stands as a valuable example in the field of agroforestry.The success of this agroforestry system has encouraged international donors and technical cooperation bodies to promote it across the Congo Basin. The Ntsio agroforestry projectThe Ntsio project ('savannah' in the Teke language), implemented by the Hanns Seidel Foundation 200 km from Kinshasa, has incorporated the recommendations from the institutional, technical and sociological reports on the Mampu project:• Resolve the issue of customary claims over the land by obtaining a ministerial subdivision order that sets out the conditions for acquiring the land; • Consider whether there is a water source in the area suitable for the implementation of an agroforestry project; • Reduce the size of the areas assigned to farmers.The Ntsio project covers 5,500 hectares comprising 260 17-hectare agroforestry farms and the infrastructure required by the participating associations (covered meeting area with an office, warehouse and water tower), materials for which come from timber plantations (mainly Eucalyptus sp.).The project area is served by a water supply network. In addition to increasing farmers' ownership of irrigation activities and maintenance, this infrastructure has allowed for the establishment of a central nursery (1 million plants/growing season, up to two seasons per year, diversification of plantations with Pinus sp., Eucalyptus sp., Maesopsis, palm trees, etc.).Farmers are grouped into four associations, which hold land titles over the project area, monitor compliance with operating standards for the farms and coordinate the community's management of the infrastructure and the sale of the goods produced.In Ntsio and Gungu, average incomes are around USD 2,600/ha at the start of acacia harvesting, equivalent to USD 200/month. It is estimated that Mampu and Ntsio each produce about 1 percent of the charcoal required by Kinshasa.Cassava yields have also increased due to wider adoption of improved varieties. The introduction of cereals and legumes to the agroforestry system is currently under way. Encouraging producers to plant acacias in cultivated areas is an effective way to gradually convert farms to this system. The creation of sustainable resources through agroforestry encourages the rural population to organize and manage their local environment. This opens up opportunities for rural people, discouraging rural depopulation and reversing the trend of the city feeding the countryside.Based on the same agroforestry model, the Ibi Batéké agroforestry carbon sink (PCIAB) was established in 2008. In 2015, it produced nearly 500 tons of cassava tubers, 100 tons of maize and almost 900 tons of makala (charcoal) annually on 80 hectares of land.These activities employ 900 workers on a daily basis and provide 1,200 indirect jobs throughout the value chain.The Mampu, Ntsio, Gungu and Ibi Batéké agroforestry carbon sink programmes cover a total of almost 18,000 ha of plantations across a very large area.At the end of 2020, the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN), DRC, resumed its the activities in the Bombo Lumene Game Reserve in the province of Kinshasa. This initiative opens up new opportunities through the implementation of a large-scale sustainable community-based agroforestry project. The project builds on previous models and aligns with the fundamental principles for the management and conservation of protected areas set out under Congolese law.In this context, a public-private partnership bringing together ICCN, scientific partners and the sponsors backing the Ibi Batéké agroforestry carbon sink is in the process of launching the Batéké Plateau Ecological Corridor (CEBAT).This initiative aims to establish a protected area covering 3.5 million hectares, stretching from the Angolan border at an altitude of 1,000 m to the northern edge of the Kwamouth Territory (Mai-Ndombe province) at an altitude of less than 400 m. It will directly impact nearly 18 million people.The Bombo Lumene Game Reserve is located in the centre of the Batéké Plateau Ecological Corridor and will link nearly 300 villages within the 'Mboka Mayele' network. The project aims to create tens of thousands of jobs. Investments will focus on agroforestry programmes, processing agricultural and forestry products and strengthening basic social and economic infrastructure.The Batéké Plateau Ecological Corridor is designed to create a green bulwark against the human pressure exerted by Kinshasa and, in 2021, ICCN and its partners began the process of registering the Batéké Plateau Ecological Corridor as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.Acacia agroforestry plantations create carbon sinks based on two components:• The permanent stock of the plantations, on harvest cycles of 8 years to more than 20 years depending on the cycle and markets chosen (charcoal, bioenergy, timber); • The annual replacement of wood, which would otherwise come from unsustainable illegal logging, deforestation or trees from natural forests, with sustainable plantation wood.This dual benefit can be used to generate carbon credits once a project has been certified to carbon standards that guarantee a project's concrete environmental benefits. Certification then makes it possible to capitalize on the environmental services delivered by a project in the form of payments for the amount of CO 2 sequestered. Nevertheless, although this method represents real progress and avoids vast areas of forest being destroyed by slash-and-burn agriculture, Dubiez et al. ( 2018) found contrasting changes in the chemical composition of the soil after 22 years of farming using the Mampu acacia agroforestry system. Soils under this system had higher levels of carbon and nitrogen as a result of nitrogen fixation by the acacia trees, but were more acidic and had lower levels of exchangeable bases (calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium) than the original savannah soils.The depletion of the mineral content of the soil over the 22-year period, for all acacia management models (unlogged plantations, one or two harvest cycles of acacia and food crops), can be explained by the transfer of cations from the soil to the plants and their removal when the products are harvested.To rectify soil acidification, the depletion of exchangeable bases and the general decline in the productivity of the system, it is necessary to propose new practices and study their impacts on the chemical composition of the soil.The undesirable effects observed could be reduced by removing the bark from trunks before carbonizing the wood, returning small branches to the ground and adding natural phosphate rocks or liming.These preliminary findings suggest that further studies are needed to improve the techniques used to manage A. auriculiformis stands and increase the sustainability of the system by managing soil fertility more effectively.Forest carbon is primarily traded on voluntary carbon markets. The Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) is one of the most widely used standards on voluntary markets, with nearly 1,800 projects certified in 2022. This corresponds to sequestration or emissions reductions equivalent to 468 million tons of carbon. 1 Once a project has been certified and verified according to the rules and requirements of a standard, it can receive carbon credits (Verified Carbon Units or VCUs).In DRC, the Ibi Batéké agroforestry carbon sink is the only project registered under the UNFCCC Clean Development Mechanism. The 2020 Ibi Batéké carbon sink verification report (experts commissioned by the World Bank) approved a final stock of 46,700 tCO 2 over an area of 800 ha (58.45 tCO 2 /ha). The 2009 greenhouse gas emission reductions agreement between the World Bank and the sponsors of the Ibi Batéké carbon sink project provides for a fixed payment of USD 4/tCO 2 1 https://registry.verra.org/app/search/VCS on the basis of temporary credits, valid for 5 years. Carbon payments also go to local family-run agroforestry farms, which have recently organized into cooperatives, such as the Cooperative and Economic Interest Grouping of the Teke Territory, which was established in 2015 with the direct involvement of customary chiefs.The Ntsio project, for its part, did not initially plan to go as far as trading the carbon it sequestered. Internal studies have shown that producer communities do not have the know-how for carbon trading, both in terms of their technical and administrative capacity. It may however be possible through a specialized third-party organization, depending on the standard chosen, the target market and changes in the market value of carbon. While there are plans to register the project with DRC's REDD unit to lay solid foundations for Ntsio to pursue carbon trading, this has not yet been done.As early as 1907, Burundi was described as a degraded landscape without many plantations. In 1933, the authorities decided to implement legal measures to protect the last remaining fragments of forest.Fifteen years later, the Burundian forestry sector had grown significantly: the forested area had reached around 90,000 ha, with 40,000 ha of tropical montane forest, 25,000 ha of savannah woodland and gallery forests, 20,000 ha of artificially afforested land and 5,000 ha of trees outside forests (FAO 1999).In 1978, following increasing pressure on natural forests and timber shortages, Burundi, supported by donors, launched a vast reforestation programme to ensure the supply of timber and reforest denuded ridges. Between 1978 and 1992, the country's forest cover increased from 3 percent to 7 percent (from 25,428 ha to 146,000 ha). More than 30,000 ha were decimated during the crisis of October 1993.In 2010, plantations occupied 146,055 ha, where 66 species were grown, 52 percent of which were for sawnwood and 48 percent for fuelwood. The species used were mainly fast-growing, multipurpose and low-cost exotic species in protection plantations, such as: Eucalyptus sp. (36 percent), Grevillea (3 percent), Pinus sp. (15 percent), Callitris calcarata (30 percent), other softwood (10 percent) (Nduwamungu 2011).Plantation forestry is tied to a number of socioeconomic and environmental challenges:• In a country like Burundi with a population density of more than 400 inhabitants per km², the availability of forest resources for multiple uses remains a major issue. The biggest challenge is finding species that meet different needs, such as for fuelwood, livestock feed and watershed protection.• Strengthening the role of forest plantations in soil protection to prevent sediment runoff and improve carbon storage. • Dependence on fuelwood, which is mainly used in rural areas (76 percent of national consumption). The diversity and complexity of the stakeholders involved is a major challenge. Owners of afforested areas (the state, municipalities, private sector), coal miners, transporters, wholesalers and major consumers (bakeries, restaurants, etc.) do not coordinate and operate without a framework for consultation. • The impact of internal and external migration on plantations. Successive wars and sociopolitical unrest in Burundi have caused massive flows of refugees and internally displaced persons. This takes a heavy toll on plantations, given that these people tend to take refuge in state or communal forests and protected areas, near Lake Tanganyika for its rich fish resources, in the Rumonge and Nyanza region for its fertile land (oil palm) and on the Bururi, Kigwena and Rumonge reserves. • Issues related to land tenure and the promotion of private forests and agroforestry systems linked to securing land rights. • Dependence on external funding allocated through the government budget and national actors in partnership with the government. The government has committed to fund reforestation efforts in full, through the national reforestation programme 'Ewe Burundi Urambaye' ('a well-dressed Burundi' in English), thereby reducing dependence on external funding.The current annual rate of deforestation is estimated at 2 percent, whereas reforestation rates remain below 1 percent (Ministry of the Environment, Agriculture and Livestock 2019).To address these problems, Burundi should launch new research and development efforts, pilot projects on industrial value creation and assess plantations' impacts on water and soil (pines, eucalyptus).In terms of initial and ongoing training, modules on monitoring natural and artificial forests using satellite data could be strengthened to enable degradation and deforestation to be closely monitored.The role of the forestry sector in the implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement should be strengthened. In its Nationally Determined Contribution, Burundi committed to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 2016 to 2030 by increasing the country's forest cover by at least 60,000 ha at a rate of 4,000 ha/year over 15 years from 2016, and up to 120,000 ha at a rate of 8,000 ha/year (subject to conditions). By 2030, the government also aims to replace all traditional charcoal kilns and all traditional cooking stoves.Since 2019, Burundi has financed efforts to delay land degradation through national programmes fully funded by national budgets.This trend should be encouraged and existing efforts should be strengthened with the support of other technical and financial partners, as well as the financing mechanisms advocated by the Paris Agreement.Robert J. van der Plas (www.marge.eu)In most African countries, wood still makes up a significant proportion of the energy mix, which has evolved without government oversight.Although the consumption of electricity, gas and petroleum products is increasing, the consumption of fuelwood is not declining at an equivalent rate; indeed, firewood and charcoal remain widely used energy sources (Owen et al. 2013). Nevertheless, the increasing volume of fuelwood and charcoal purchased even in rural areas opens up opportunities for farmers and landowners to sell trees as a cash crop.Rwanda offers a case in point. Here the strong demand for fuelwood continues unabated, even though wood from natural forests had virtually disappeared decades ago. It is relatively difficult to obtain wood from public plantations and there is very little land available for additional large-scale plantations (whether private or public) due to the high population density. Farmers saw a business opportunity in this situation and planted large numbers of trees on their land to sell to the fuelwood market.In doing so, they compensated for the loss of natural forest and the majority of fuelwood now comes from trees planted for this purpose. However, this situation is generally poorly recognized, given that the government has recently taken steps to shut down the production of charcoal, which predominantly uses wood from purpose-planted trees. Much of the population will continue to use fuelwood as its main source of energy for some time to come, because it is still cheaper than electricity, gas or petroleum products for an equivalent energy yield. Wood from farmers' fields has a lower production cost than that from large plantations and can be obtained without having to navigate administrative barriers.Although the government asserts that it can plant more trees on marginal land, it is unclear whether this wood will be easy to sell. Indeed, the cost per m3 is substantially higher than for wood from farmers' land. There are no reliable data on the actual production and use of fuelwood that could be used to reliably determine whether this will be a problem in the future. The supply of fuelwood has met demand for energy without major government intervention and it appears that this will not change in the near future.Despite alarmist rhetoric about an imminent wood shortage in Africa, fuelwood is still widely used in many African countries. Progress has been slow on improving access to electricity for most people and population growth often outpaces the number of new connections. If the use of electricity and liquefied petroleum gas is not incentivized by generous subsidies, fuelwood will remain the cheapest source of energy for cooking and likely the main source of energy in many countries.Despite strong potential and attractive opportunities, investment in commercial forestry plantations in Africa has stalled due to 20 years of sluggish economic growth.According to the literature, financing is generally available for commercial operations that will generate a positive cashflow in three to five years and that have an acceptable level of risk.For this reason, banks may be less interested in financing the production side of plantation forestry projects, but more interested in downstream segments like processing or adding value. Indeed, the fastest time to positive cashflow reported by plantation forestry investments is 5-8 years (Harwood and Nambiar 2014).In Central Africa (with differences between countries), investments are complicated further by unclear land tenure and land-use arrangements, weak industrial infrastructure, poor technology and low productivity, as well as serious funding gaps.Some authors note that different stakeholders are hindered by different barriers to investing in plantation forestry in Africa: local investors and financiers are opportunistic, strategic investors face barriers to entry, financial investors have demanding investment criteria (mainly risk related) and development financing projects seek enabling conditions (Indufor 2016).However, investment in the forestry sector may take the form of greenfield investments in plantation establishment, processing or forestry, within the framework of official development assistance. This category of investments can be broken down into five main groups, shown below with a few examples that could be scaled up:• Development finance institutions, such as the African Development Bank and the World Bank, with the possibility for them to compensate for the long lead times and social risks associated with plantation forestry; • Donors with incentive schemes for local tree growers and farmers (Global Environment Facility (GEF), Climate Investment Funds (CIF), Adaptation Fund and other trust funds); • Governments with innovative policies on leasing land to responsible investors; • Governments and donors jointly providing support, sharing risk, developing infrastructure to facilitate forest investments or providing complementary financial guarantees (forest investment programmes); • Strategic and financial investors who partner with local actors and take advantage of opportunities in Africa.Compared to other land-use options, the majority of investments in commercial plantation forestry are, at best, marginally profitable. It is therefore imperative to be fully aware of the key challenges affecting African forestry, which, if addressed, can become enabling conditions for successful investment. Poor understanding of these challenges has led to the current suboptimal state of the majority of greenfield plantation investments.The African forestry sector can be regarded as high risk from an environmental, social and governance, business integrity and financial returns perspective. The main risks relate to land use and loss of livelihoods, occupational health and safety skills, social acceptability, negative impacts on biodiversity, the potential for bribery and corruption, an uncertain investment environment, inadequate infrastructure and illegal logging of natural forests.Though there is significant opportunity for investment growth in the African forestry sector, progress is hindered by a risk-averse investment climate, the limited availability of financing and the lack of successful forestry business models (outside South Africa).Investing in Africa's forests is a bold undertaking, but one the continent urgently needs, for the sustainability of its wood supply, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and rural development.Agroforestry and carbon markets could therefore offer a solution to these challenges, if not be a game changer.African forestry is generally not developed or liquid enough to carry commercial debt.The basic long-term internal rate of return of forestry projects is usually somewhere between 6 percent and 9 percent. In very specific imperfect market conditions, more can be achieved, but not usually in the long term. Engaging in downstream processing can improve returns, but is not without its challenges.Financing solutions are becoming more complex in the face of these return metrics and equity from committed investors would be the most appropriate option. Commercial investors often demand more than a 15 percent return on investment to offset the risk profile.If an investment project succeeds in raising some form of concessional debt, this is very valuable. However, it is difficult to find and often comes with near impossible strings attached.Many development banks take a commercial approach to the African forestry sector and often demand a return on investment that exceeds the potential internal rate of return. Project leaders are then encouraged to be optimistic when estimating profitability in order to raise the necessary funds.Project leaders who have obtained debt financing then find themselves urgently trying to reach profitability before debts become too large to service.Equity financing, on the other hand, comes with its own challenges. For example, assessing the value of a project is difficult for investors who enter a long-term investment at different stages.The lack of a positive track record is a significant challenge for the African forest investment space. If a project ends up needing to raise capital before it is generating significant return on investment, it will most likely find itself in a tenuous position. The project will need to prove to capital providers that it is one of the few success stories and that it is close to turning a profit.This will require a strong business plan, convincing management, a track record of meeting budgets and a bit of luck.If the project is indeed successful in raising funds, the original investors will usually find their stake either heavily diluted, subsidizing a high interest rate or both. The only way to avoid this mid-cycle risk is to have sufficient funding to reach positive cashflow from the outset.The various financial and investment options available for the development of plantation forestry can be grouped into three partnership models: public-private partnerships, private sector-community partnerships and partnerships between financial institutions and countries.Public-private partnerships have proven to be a model for economic prosperity in many sectors and there are a number of examples in Central Africa relating to the establishment of forest plantations.In Gabon, since the end of 2011, the company Plantations Forestières de la Mvoum (PFM) has been working to develop a 40,000-hectare area about 100 km from Libreville awarded by the Gabonese Government.Approximately 17,000 hectares of existing 30-55-year-old okoumé plantations are expected to produce 100,000 m 3 of logs per year. These plantations are scheduled to be harvested over 20 years and replaced with clonal teak.To finance part of its investment programme, PFM carried out a capital increase in 2013 reserved for Gabon's Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, allowing it to acquire 15 percent of the capital.Since 2014, work has focused on establishing the first teak plantations and harvesting the existing okoumé plantations. By the end of 2016, the nursery had about 100,000 teak plants and 100 hectares of clonal teak had been planted.At the same time, PFM continued its applied research programme on tropical forest plantations, focusing on the genetic improvement of plant material.In 2016, PFM signed a partnership agreement with Gabon Special Economic Zone, which will purchase almost all of the okoumé produced from its plantations.New avenues for creating value will be explored, working with partners where relevant. PFM's ambition is to meet the growing need for timber and fuelwood in Africa, against a backdrop of strong demand for renewable products and rising fossil fuel prices.The ten-year partnership between the Government of the Republic of the Congo and Société Plantations Forestières Batéké Brazzaville (SPF2B) aimed to plant 10,000 hectares of forest to supply the Brazzaville market with charcoal from sustainable plantations and partially replace the charcoal currently obtained by cutting natural forests.According to the agreement, SPF2B is responsible for financing the project, while the government, with PRONAR, facilitates access to improved plant material and technical exchanges on plantation management.Planting started in October 2018 with an annual planting target of 500 to 1,000 ha. The project is expected to create 500 direct jobs in neighbouring communities and to catalyse the development of village plantations, thereby contributing to the national objective of planting trees over 1 million hectares (ATIBT 2019).Lessons can be learned from Uganda's Supporting Timber Plantations through the Sawlog Production Grant Scheme (SPGS).Before the launch of this project in Uganda, a long history of underfunding forest operations and poor management had contributed to the degradation of forestry plantations that were originally publicly managed.Productive plantations on degraded forestland were seen as a way to meet the growing demand for timber while relieving the pressure on the remaining natural forests.The objective of the EU-supported SPGS programme is to promote private sector investment in timber production by supporting plantation development on degraded forestland with muchneeded financial and technical support.Financial assistance is provided as a direct grant paid within two years of planting. The total grant is USD 330 per hectare, but will only be paid if the growers meet the conditions set out in the contracts that must be agreed in advance. No money is paid up-front.The main conditions are: sound species choice, using only improved seed, with at least 80 percent survival after planting, and ensuring the plantation is weeded and protected for two years. The principle is to 'grow trees' rather than simply 'plant trees'.SPGS offers farmers sound technical support and two forestry companies also provide training to Ugandan foresters. Through field meetings, practical training courses and publications, the SPGS team has begun to convince people that commercial forestry is a serious business opportunity for those with suitable land in Uganda.SPGS has funded 10,000 ha of plantations to date, from small community-based tree planting associations to large-scale commercial operations. The programme has also supported communities to plant seedlings, led to the establishment of the Uganda Timber Growers Association and created 5,000 jobs.So far, growers have used degraded land in forest reserves leased by the National Forest Authority, but interest in using private land is now growing. Support to plant an additional 25,000 ha has been requested. 2The issue of independent businesses launching development projects and social inclusion in the forestry sector must not be overlooked if we want to improve the livelihoods of small-scale tree farmers by encouraging them to plant trees on small plots, despite challenges linked to land tenure.Agroforestry appears to be a relevant approach to relieving the pressure on natural forests. The World Bank is working with partners in Mai-Ndombe province, DRC, on an integrated REDD+ initiative built around investments and performance-based payments (World Bank 2018). Since 2014, the Forest Investment Programme (FIP) has been supporting farmers to implement agroforestry activities, such as planting several million acacia trees under the agroforestry model described in this chapter.This programme is reported to have improved the living conditions of thousands of farmers, sequestered carbon in planted forests and reduced carbon emissions. Participants also receive payments from the Carbon Fund of the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) under an Emissions Reduction Payment Agreement (ERPA) signed by the World Bank and the Government of DRC. The average cost of establishing one hectare of this type of agroforestry plantation is estimated at USD 1,000. 3The African Development Bank (AfDB) recognizes the economic and development potential of a thriving large-scale forestry sector on the continent. Furthermore, the Climate Investment Funds have already invested substantial resources to attract investment to the sector, which is growing in importance as its role in climate change mitigation and adaptation has recently been highlighted. The Climate Investment Funds are currently working to encourage the private sector to invest in transforming the African forestry sector (AfDB et al. 2019).The Green Zones Development Support Project in Kenya (the Mau Forest Reforestation Project) was financed by the AfDB (2007AfDB ( -2016) ) to the tune of USD 38.8 million, which led to the reforestation of 14,300 ha. The project led to the creation of 3,000 permanent and sustainable jobs in communities bordering forests and increased the income of 17,100 households (40 percent headed by women) (AfDB 2018). Over the ten years of the project, the average cost of establishing one hectare of forest was estimated at USD 2,713.When it comes to management and staffing, setting up a plantation project in Africa from scratch is not an easy task. There are a number of possible approaches, but all face the challenge of balancing overhead costs and maintaining an adequate skill base.In the early years, many projects require the presence of expatriate staff to get them off the ground.Planning how to minimize the use of expatriate staff should be a priority early in the project life cycle. Effective high-quality staff training is one of the single most important hallmarks of a successful project. Gradually shifting responsibility from expatriate managers to local staff is more cost effective and ensures sustainability.Plantation development and management is a science, developed and practised successfully in many countries around the world. Some argue that it is important to incorporate traditional farming practices into plantation management. However, care should be taken not to 'reinvent the wheel' where very simple and successful established practices exist.Health and safety does not often come naturally to developing markets. Having a healthy and safe workforce requires considerable investment in the early days, but is indispensable for success in the long term. Third-party forest management certification can also be a helpful framework to support the integration of health and safety measures. A skilled, healthy and safe workforce will be motivated to come to work, keen to improve their skills and share the company's values.It is best practice to use improved genetic material regardless of the type of plantation forestry.There is however some debate around whether to use clonal or non-clonal species and there are many valid arguments on both sides. Clonal forestry using a sufficiently wide genetic base offers the best return on investment for many traditional plantation species. Unfortunately, many plantation projects in Africa have not used high-quality genetic material from the outset. The composition and growth rate of early plantations often has a significant impact on their commercial viability. Many large professional companies have however begun to pay greater attention to genetics more recently. When implementing a project, time and logistical constraints are often cited as reasons for the use of poor-quality genetic material. It is however risky to rush this essential step when establishing a plantation.The success of a forestry project relies on the compatibility of the site and the species used. While this may seem obvious, many still get it wrong.To match a site with the rights species, the soil must first be analysed and long-term meteorological data collected (including consideration of climate change-related risks). As those of us who have been caught out know, with rainfall, it is not just long-term averages that matter, but the magnitude of annual variation.In most African countries outside South Africa, forest owners are on their own in the event of a fire. Fire is a serious risk in most plantation regions in Africa. There are four main ways to manage this risk: 1. Manage the forest to reduce the fuel load during fire seasons (weeding plantations) and by creating firebreaks; 2. Set up rapid response fire detection and suppression capacity; 3. Work with neighbours to prevent fires across the wider landscape and develop community safety plans; 4. Consider buying insurance.A major criticism of plantation forestry is the risk of biodiversity loss when planting large areas with a small number of non-native species.However, in the case of Uganda, for example, the International Woodland Company (IWC) invested in pine and eucalyptus plantations in an area where the landscape had become highly degraded due to slash-and-burn agriculture and unmanaged grazing. Here, the plantations restored productivity to the landscape and protected vast natural forests and riparian areas from encroachment and further degradation.As part of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification process, IWC hired an external partner to carry out biodiversity studies twice a year. These studies continuously reported that plantation activities were not harming conservation or biodiversity and that more species of birds and mammals had been observed at all sites surveyed. These plantations are more biodiverse than neighbouring farmland (without responsibly managed plantations scenario).In Africa, many markets for forest products are informal and underdeveloped. Understanding the market is crucial in the planning stage. Some organizations have the skills to move downstream into processing, while others may simply wish to remain plantation owners.To be able to plan for the future, it is crucial that project leaders understand both current trade restrictions and the political will behind them.Land tenure is one of the most contentious issues affecting plantation forestry investments in Africa. Intractable challenges can arise when a land-intensive resource like a forest is combined with poorly defined and enforced land tenure legislation and a local population of marginalized subsistence farmers who are highly dependent on the land.In Uganda, IWC was able to navigate these challenges through strong leadership, by drafting a company code of conduct, hiring a dedicated community engagement team, consulting regularly with communities, developing and managing a grievance redress mechanism and delivering community co-benefit activities. Despite the perception that tenure poses one of the biggest risks for plantation forestry investments in Africa, IWC's approach has substantially minimized this risk.Valuable lessons have been learned about land tenure over the investment period. It is necessary to:• Only invest in a project once the land tenure is clear. Doing so saves precious time and allows investment capital to get to work immediately. • Have a thorough understanding of the plantable land before investing, not only in terms of biological capacity, but also with respect to conflicting land rights. Not having such an understanding from the outset could negatively impact the expected return on investment. • Navigating land tenure enforcement with the relevant authorities is challenging, especially while upholding the company code of conduct. Nevertheless, maintaining positive relationships, frequent engagement and collaboration with relevant civil society organizations can be effective.There are a wide range of stakeholders involved in African timberland investments: investors, sector stakeholders, governments (local, national and foreign), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), research organizations, media representatives and local communities.Fast-growing forest plantation projects -like any large-scale land purchase -must comply with the minimum requirements imposed by the host country to limit environmental and social harms.Virtually all countries require projects to conduct an environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) and adopt an impact management plan, obtain free, prior and informed consent and provide evidence of widespread community support; however, the conditions and guidelines for the establishment, monitoring and application of the measures adopted vary from one country to another.Given private sector companies' growing interest in commercial plantations and their arrival in complex and vulnerable environments, it is important to recognize weaknesses in the host country's formal risk management frameworks.In jurisdictions where enforcement is weak, voluntary forest management certification has proven to be a valuable tool for ensuring that forestry investments meet the high environmental, social and governance standards advocated by investors.Plantation managers are not simply required to ensure a return on investment; they must also secure community and government benefits, manage investments in or support for regional resilience frameworks, and participate in initiatives to build the capacity of local institutions and regional economic communities. The private sector must moreover comply with existing national and international laws and good practices, if its presence is to have a positive impact over time.Successful investments in plantation forestry in Africa:• Are actively involved in relevant local and wider networks. This includes tree growers' associations, various local NGOs, the European Commission (or other multinational bodies), the FAO, FSC and various platforms bringing together other plantation operators in the region. • Develop a process for obtaining the free, prior and informed consent of community stakeholders.• Establish a flexible community engagement, grievance redress and outreach strategy based on regular and responsive engagement with neighbouring communities. • Engage in positive media communication and share success stories.• Establish a company policy on how to address media, research and other indirect stakeholder enquiries, and ensure key staff are informed on how to respond to such enquiries. Enquiring parties with a pre-existing negative agenda pose significant reputational risk.Managing community expectations can be very challenging. From the outset and through frequent engagement, make it clear what the programme will look like, what both sides expect and how they will benefit. Do not overpromise. Have a support plan for programme co-implementers.External funding (outside of investment funds) plays an important role in initiating community outreach programmes, which work to reduce risk, secure value and create lasting impact. Nevertheless, investment overheads must still include funding for maintaining community buy-in through continuous engagement activities that outlive external project financing.Development finance institutions have a range of tools to support private sector actors to make sustainable investments in plantation forestry and agriculture. One of these tools is the implementation of the voluntary sustainability standards or performance standards introduced in the private financial sector. Major financial institutions have committed to apply the International Finance Corporation (IFC) performance standards, which provide a clear framework for managing social, environmental and biodiversity-related risks.Continuing with the example of IWC in Uganda, the initial company that received the investment was founded in the late 1990s with the goal of pursuing sustainable forestry through the sale of carbon credits. The voluntary carbon market and associated revenues did not materialize as expected and IWC's investors undertook to purchase the project and develop a commercially viable plantation.The company has maintained its Gold Standard certification throughout the investment holding period and the project is expected to generate more than 1.5 million tons of certified carbon credits over its 50-year lifetime.Although the certification is relatively low maintenance, since the Gold Standard accepts the FSC certification/audit procedure as a proxy (except for the carbon inventory component), carbon forestry is not without its challenges.Carbon forestry has been the subject of extensive criticism and significant managerial resources have been required to maintain the project's credibility. There was also a potential liability on exit, given that the land is required to be held in continuous cycle forestry for the 50-year duration of the certification (this did not however prove to be a problem). Ultimately, there has been little appetite for carbon credits and prices have not achieved the level expected.Various lessons can be learned from this experience:• Until the factors affecting carbon prices shift significantly, it is perhaps best to consider carbon credits sales as an upside to investments in plantation forestry, rather than as a foundational component.• The question of carbon 'tenure' has become a hot topic following the signature of the Paris Agreement and the adoption of its nationally determined contributions. It is therefore advisable to ensure project leaders have a good understanding of the national government's position on forest carbon ownership and transferability. • Long-term carbon supply agreements with large buyers should be considered.• Engaging with critics of carbon forestry is recommended, both to understand the risks and concerns related to engaging in this sector and to take steps to mitigate them, while building positive working relationships.The development of plantation forestry in Africa, particularly in Ghana, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, South Africa, Eswatini and Uganda, has been undertaken by the private sector since the 1980s when government initiatives were constrained by limited resources and budgets.This is in direct contrast to earlier patterns of plantation development (1930s to 1970s) when governments were the dominant developers of commercial plantation forestry.Andries Smith -Forestry Investment Consultant Among programmes aimed at rapidly developing the sector to reach significant industrial scale, those focused on large companies have been most successful, as evidenced by the Chilean and Uruguayan schemes where plantations have reach millions of hectares in size.The example of Chile is interesting: the sale of large tracts of government-owned land at attractive prices, tax breaks and the provision of cheap and long-term credit were very attractive to corporations, as were the clear and simple procedures for accessing these measures. In contrast, where incentives have been aimed at supporting the development of small or medium-size plantations, the size of the areas planted was far smaller than under the South American programmes, but there was far wider participation by rural people.The Sawlog Production Grant Scheme (SPGS) in Uganda provides insight into the balance that can be achieved between the various scales of growers, if the needs at each scale are recognized and appropriate incentives proposed. For example, large-scale growers were less interested in the indirect services offered by SPGS and far more focused on monetary grants (for improving in-house skills and sending staff on training courses), while small (<10 ha) and medium-size (10-100 ha) growers were dependant on SPGS for these indirect support services.The example of SPGS in Uganda has also demonstrated the need for ongoing and detailed technical support in the area of forestry for small and medium growers to enable them to meet technical performance standards. Grower field days, plantation visits by skilled extension officers, environmental education and safe working practices are essential prerequisites for the successful establishment and management of these new plantations.Access to land with secure tenure for a period of at least two to three harvest cycles of timber (25 to 50 years) is an irreplaceable prerequisite to attract growers to establish commercial timber plantations.In Chile, government-owned land was sold to growers at very attractive prices on the condition that the growers would hold the land for a set time and establish plantations on it. As a consequence of the development of the forestry sector, the value of this land has increased considerably, thereby increasing growers' assets. This has allowed them to obtain additional financing for processing facilities, for example, based on the strength of their balance sheets.In Uruguay, land was specially zoned for forestry and the purchase of this land for plantations was incentivized by grants to subsidize the cost of establishing a plantation. Like in Uganda, the grants were only paid out after a site inspection by the authorities had confirmed that the trees had been successfully established.In Uganda, growers have been licensed by the National Forest Authority (NFA) to use land on government-owned Central Forest Reserves (CFRs). Subject to a performance review after two years, the licences are issued for a period of 25 years. Initially medium and large-scale growers were given preference when applying for licences, as it was thought that small-scale growers would not be able to meet the performance criteria. These small-scale growers objected to the 50-hectare minimum area requirement and the NFA acknowledged the importance of including them. Smallscale growers were subsequently granted licences to establish plantations in CFRs.It is now widely accepted that forest plantation interventions that include farmers at all scales are more stable, subject to less conflict and far more socially acceptable. There has been strong opposition to plantation development in Chile, Uruguay and Brazil where plantation ownership is dominated by large corporations, many of them foreign owned. In contrast, where participation has been more broad based, such as in Tanzania and Uganda, there has been far less opposition to timber plantations and in many instances the general public views their creation as very positive.Competitive tender processes for assigning land for commercial forestry plantations, such as those used in Chile and Uganda, are seen as fair, provided that small growers are protected by a system guaranteeing that a fair proportion of the land is allocated to them.Access to appropriate financing mechanisms is as important as access to land. The types of funding available and how this funding is accessed and disbursed needs to be aligned with the participants of the plantation development programme, its objectives and the funders involved:• Grants, which recipients are not required to repay, are most important for small and mediumsize growers. Without them, these growers would not have the resources to plant the trees.Where grant disbursements have been subject to performance criteria, access to other sources of funding have been used, typically loans from family members or village saving schemes. • Equity funding, which comes in various forms, allows funders to take a stake in the shareholding of the company or venture. There are a number of examples in Uganda where family members have provided equity funding to enable the applicant to access the minimum plantation size required by the licence agreement. Larger companies, on the other hand, have all leveraged equity funding from various sources, including high net-worth individuals, family offices and development finance institutions (e.g. Green Resources, New Forests Company and Global-Woods, which are all active in East Africa). The shareholder agreements signed by these large companies are far more sophisticated and formal than those used by the family businesses that have established plantations in Uganda. Greenfield forestry development requires 'patient capital' due to the long lead time between establishment and the generation of revenues from the sale of the forest products. • Loans have to be repaid at some point and typically attract interest. Loan funding is really only accessible to larger, formal companies. All actors that have established plantations in the East Africa region have indicated that loan funding must have the following characteristics:» Have a term aligned with the harvest cycle length of the plantations.» Allow for an interest deferral period, typically the first few years of the loan when the business does not have the cashflow to service the loan.» Carry an interest rate that is aligned with the typical returns offered by commercial forestry plantations. Interest rates in excess of 10 percent have been extremely challenging for forestry companies. A nominal interest rate of 1 percent or 2 percent above inflation seems to be the maximum that greenfield plantation projects can realistically afford.Financial support can also take other forms, such as tax breaks or the sale of land by the government at very affordable prices, as in Chile, but these measures are more attractive to large companies.The value of high-quality planting stock has been proven in many cases where forestry plantations have been developed or extended.One of the most effective ways to secure high-quality plants is by buying seed from tree improvement programmes that have been in operation for a number of years. Growers in Chile drew on the New Zealand Pinus radiata breeding programme that had been running for many years.The SPGS programme in Uganda not only helped to source improved seed from South Africa, Australia and other counties, but also introduced a nursery certification system to accredit nurseries as suppliers of high-quality plants grown from improved seed. Buying seedlings from an accredited nursery was made a prerequisite for the disbursement of grant funding to growers, ensuring that they would plant only the best plants available. Given that neither seeds nor young plants have any particular visual characteristics that indicate the quality of the trees that will be produced, it is essential that seed is obtained from known and reputable sources.To accelerate the development and deployment of improved planting material, another option is to join or form a tree improvement cooperative to screen and develop new seeds and plants. Plantation companies in Lichinga province in Northern Mozambique joined the CAMCORE cooperative, which operates out of North Carolina State University, to access a wide range of genetic material to select that most suited to the area.Increased temperatures due to global warming are already affecting the use of Pinus patula and Eucalyptus grandis, two of the most common plantation species grown in Africa. These species are becoming increasingly susceptible to pests and diseases. The development and use of hybrids (P. patula x tecunumanii, P. elliotii x caribaea and various hybrids of E.grandis x urophylla, E. grandis x pelita) offers a potential solution, as these hybrids are far superior to the pure species in that they have faster growth rates, better wood properties and greater resistance to pests and disease.For support programmes to be most effective, it is essential that they are designed to run over extended timeframes given the typical harvest cycle length of forestry plantations. It takes time to get programmes up and running to the point where they are both effective and efficient. A long-term programme must have a long-term vision and a funding stream to match. Consistency and continuity are important aspects of successful programmes, because uptake by growers is dependent on growers understanding how the support arrangements work and having confidence in their ability to benefit from the incentives on offer.The old adage 'you can only manage what you measure' is particularly relevant to the development of the plantation forestry sector. The absence of a National Forest Inventory in Uganda is hampering the further development of the sector as there are no publicly available statistics on the extent of the commercial forestry estate. This information gap concerning the raw materials makes it difficult for investors to support downstream processing initiatives. It is common knowledge that there are vast areas of plantations, but details about them -such as their geographic location, region, species or age-class distribution -are not known. It is strongly recommended that a national forestry inventory be launched in tandem with or as an integral component of any plantation development programme.Fast-growing tree plantations could make a significant contribution to the conservation and sustainable management of forest ecosystems and people's livelihoods in Central Africa. Nevertheless, they come with significant controversy related to the alteration and homogenization of ecosystems and the loss of access to land and resources for indigenous communities and local rural populations (who depend on forest services and products).Given the private sector's growing appetite for commercial plantations and commercial players' entry into complex and fragile contexts, it is essential to ensure all stakeholders' needs are considered and environmental and social risks carefully weighed. Finance institutions have a range of tools to support private sector actors to invest sustainably in plantation forestry and agriculture.Interconnected regional and national policy approaches remain imperative to regulate regional and local priorities and to adopt laws and regulations that promote responsible investment.In Central Africa, such investments are complicated by unclear land tenure and land-use arrangements, weak industrial infrastructure, poor technology, low productivity and serious funding gaps.Compared to other land-use options, the majority of investments in commercial plantation forestry are, at best, marginally profitable. It is therefore imperative to be fully aware of the key challenges affecting African forestry, which, if addressed, can become enabling conditions for successful investment. Poor understanding of these challenges has led to the current suboptimal state of the majority of greenfield plantation investments.The various financial and investment options available for the development of plantation forestry can be grouped into three partnership models: public-private partnerships, private sector-community partnerships and partnerships between financial institutions and countries.The sustainability of plantation forestry in Central Africa depends on the decisions taken at each stage of the project: selecting managers and staff, establishing the plantation, determining the forestry or forest management techniques to be used, and managing land tenure and marketing, stakeholder engagement, carbon impact assessment and certification standards."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2080600091.json b/main/part_2/2080600091.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..580d8ec155f857d54c1bbb85778b0d4a7a43479a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2080600091.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"54966a7b399cad3302b91b34aa2760c4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H041591.pdf","id":"1760525304"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"782d5ece-8377-48ea-a2d0-02bed1f0dfbe","content":"Management of land, soil and water are intimately related and complementary to each other. Land degradation, and in particular soil quality degradation, is a major factor limiting agricultural water productivity and is often neglected in water management circles. When degradation of agricultural soil resources results in productivity declines that are more limiting than water, then water productivity declines. The best existing evaluation of the extent of soil degradation worldwide is still the Global Assessment of Land Degradation (GLASOD) by Oldeman (1991). Based on this assessment we can infer that on 50% of arable land worldwide, water productivity is below what could have been expected before degradation occurred (Wood et al., 2000; see also Eswaran et al. (2001) for more detailed treatment of yield impacts from land degradation). Soil degradation limits water productivity in cases where absolute quantities of water are not the most limiting factor. This situation is widespread, considering that nutrients can be more limiting than water even in very dry areas, such as the Sahel (Penning de Vries and Djiteye, 1982;Breman, 1998). Addressing these constraints is critical if improvements in water productivity are to be achieved. Increasing awareness of a 'global water crisis' recognizes that the scarcity of clean water does affect food production and conservation of ecosystems. It is predicted that by 2025, most developing countries will face either physical or economic water scarcity, while at the same time global demand for food will increase (Molden, 2007). Because irrigated and rainfed agriculture is by far the largest human consumptive use of fresh water, improving the productivity of water used in agriculture can assist in increasing food production while maintaining water-related ecosystem services. Tackling human-induced degradation of agricultural lands is therefore central to addressing the 'water crisis'.This chapter reviews a range of studies and concepts regarding options for improving water productivity through improved land management that mitigates soil degradation, and aims to highlight its importance as part of a comprehensive strategy to address global water scarcity. The focus is primarily on crop water productivity at the field scale, but the importance of taking a landscape-scale perspective when evaluating impacts of changes in water use is also discussed.Soil and land degradation can be identified and described in terms of physical, chemical and biological changes from some ideal state brought about by natural or man-made influences. Soil degradation is often assessed as the amount of soil material that has been removed from a landscape by water and wind erosion, since these physical changes are obvious and quantifiable. The effects on fundamental chemical properties, soil nutrient supplies and soil biological activity are, however, often less obvious and more insidious in nature. All of these forms of degradation significantly influence water productivity in both rainfed and irrigated production systems (Table 2.1). The degree of impact will depend on the type and level of degradation.The impact of soil chemical degradation on water productivity is predominantly direct. By reducing yields, chemical degradation reduces water productivity. One form and cause of chemical degradation is the loss of soil organic matter, which is a ubiquitous and underappreciated form of degradation. Soil organic matter (SOM) both acts as a substrate upon which the macro-and micro-flora and fauna depend, and also mediates the cycling of nutrients within ecosystems and imparts important chemical attributes to soils, such as cation exchange capacity (CEC) and buffer capacity. When ecosystems are disturbed through changed land use and continuous cultivation, the productivity of most agricultural soils declines rapidly, particularly under humid climatic conditions, due to a loss in SOM (Kang and Juo, 1986;Aweto et al., 1992;Noble et al., 2000Noble et al., , 2001)), accelerated acidification (Gillman et al., 1985;Noble et al., 2000) and a reduction in CEC, thereby limiting the ability of the soil to hold important nutrients.Chemical degradation, including loss of soil organic matter and nutrient depletion, is a form of degradation that has been underappreciated for decades in high-input systems, as inputs can be increased to offset the yield impacts of degradation. For example, yield declines in rice-rice systems in the Indo-Ganges plain were only recently revealed through long-term yield data analysis. These analyses showed a yield decline of 37 kg/ha/year over 20 years (Padre and Ladha, 2004). This represents a 15% decline over the study period, undetected in shorter-term studies. The decline could be reversed through the application of NPK fertilizer and farmyard manure, thus indicating that soil chemical degradation through organic matter and nutrient depletion was the primary cause of observed yield declines (see Penning de Vries, Chapter 5, this volume).The impacts of salinization and waterlogging in irrigated systems are better appreciated. In the irrigation systems of arid and semi-arid zones, one of the largest threats to sustained agricultural production and water productivity is secondary salinization. Although data are poor, estimates indicate that 20% of irrigated land worldwide suffers from secondary saliniza- (Oldeman, 1991).tion and waterlogging (Wood et al., 2000), induced by the build-up of salts introduced in irrigation water or mobilized within the soil profile. Currently, the FAO estimates that 29% of the irrigated land in six countries of the Near East had salinity problems between 1990and 1994(Martinez-Beltran and Manzur, 2005) (Sakthivadivel et al., 1999). Although it is relatively easy to link salinity to poverty, limited information is available that places a monetary value on the social and economic impacts (Ali et al., 2001). Available information addresses mainly crop yield losses on salt-affected soils, revealing estimates of an annual global income loss in excess of US$12 billion (Ghassemi et al., 1995).The impact of physical degradation on water productivity is mainly indirect. By interfering with the soil water balance and the ability of plants to access soil water, physical degradation reduces water productivity. Physical degradation includes soil erosion, crust formation, structural decline, compaction and waterlogging, all of which have a negative impact on yields and hence water productivity. As with chemical degradation, loss of soil organic matter is one of the primary causes of physical degradation because it is vital to the maintenance of soil structure.Soil erosion is one of the most severe forms of soil physical degradation and results in the irreversible removal of fertile surface layers. A decrease in soil depth due to erosion will result in a loss of clay and organic matter, and thereby reduces the water-holding capacity of the soil and soil depth (Stocking, 1994). Both of these impacts will significantly reduce the productivity potential of soils and the physical attributes of the solum. Likewise, the formation of surface crusts will result in a dramatic decline in the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil surface, thereby impeding the intake of water into the soil profile and reducing its recharge (Nishimura et al., 1990;Miller and Radcliffe, 1992). Moreover, crusts are known to inhibit the seedling emergence of crops as the crust dries out and develops its hardness (Nabi et al., 2001).As a result of compaction, the total porosity and the proportion of large pores (macropores) diminishes while the proportion of smaller pores increases (Cruse and Gupta, 1991). A decrease in porosity, with an associated increase in soil bulk density, induces an increase in the mechanical impedance of the soil, thereby limiting root proliferation (Oussible et al., 1992;Dunker et al., 1995). Based on field experiments using upland rice, Hasegawa and Kasubuchi (1993) illustrated the water extraction patterns of plants. When a soil profile is thoroughly wet, plants extract most soil water from shallow, densely rooted layers. With a decrease in surface-layer water content, water retained in deeper layers begins to make a larger contribution to transpiration. If a crop has a sparse root system in these deeper layers, the crop ceases to extract soil water, even though there may be sufficient soil moisture at depth. Thus, crops with a poor root distribution system are more susceptible to drought when compared with crops that do not have this limitation.Global water scarcity analyses generally agree that a large share of the world population -up to two-thirds -will be affected by water scarcity over the next few decades (cf. Shiklomanov, 1991;Alcamo et al., 1997Alcamo et al., , 2000;;Raskin et al., 1997;Seckler et al., 1998;Vorosmarty et al., 2000;Wallace, 2000;Wallace and Gregory, 2002). While views diverge as to whether or not this constitutes a 'crisis', it is clear and inescapable that as the global population grows, there will be proportionally less water available per capita, given that the resource base is more or less constant. It is often assumed that such water scarcity means that people will have insufficient water for their domestic use, but this is not necessarily the case. At a minimum water requirement per capita of 50 l/day, the annual domestic requirement is less than 20 m 3 per capita. In fact, the total amount of water required for domestic purposes is small compared with the water required for other basic needs, such as to produce their food (Rijsberman, 2006).People require thousands of litres of water per day to produce their food, depending on their dietary and lifestyle preferences. On average, it takes roughly 70 times more water to grow food for people than people use directly for domestic purposes (cf. SIWI and IWMI, 2004). In addition, the large majority (up to 90%) of the water provided to people for domestic purposes is returned after use as wastewater and can be recycled, while most of the water (40-90%) provided to agriculture is consumed (evapotranspired) and cannot be reused, until it falls again as precipitation.There is broad agreement that future increases in water scarcity will turn water into a key, or the key, limiting factor in food production and livelihood generation for poor people throughout much of rural Asia and most of Africa, with particularly severe scarcity in the breadbaskets of north-west India and northern China. Competition for water is cause for considerable political tension and concern already, for example on the Euphrates and Jordan, and these tensions have little to do with domestic water demand but are driven by water demands for the agricultural sector (Phillips et al., 2006). The Millennium Development Goal (MDG) target to halve the proportion of poor and hungry by 2015 will require feeding 900 million more people and improving the dietary composition of 400 million others. It is estimated that this will require a 50% increase in freshwater use in agriculture by 2015, and a doubling of freshwater consumption by 2050, if production is to keep pace with population growth (Rockström et al., 2005). Analysis of future water requirements also suggests that a large proportion of this increased food production will have to be met in the rainfed agricultural sector (Rockström et al., 2005), due to limitations to the continued development of irrigated agriculture. In Asia especially, new irrigation development faces increasing competition from other sectors of the economy, including industry, urban centres and the environment.Given increasing conflicts over fresh water, and considering that the production of food is the largest consumptive user of fresh water, it is now appreciated that efforts to improve the productivity of water in agriculture can result in significant savings in water diverted or used to produce food. Agricultural water productivity can be a very broad concept, expressing the beneficial output per unit of water input, and encompassing biophysical and social aspects of the relationship between production and water use (Molden et al., 2007). This concept would then have various values at different spatial scales (plant, field, farm, irrigation network, river basin and agroecological zone) and different stakeholders (farmers, system managers, policy makers). Here, we will focus on agricultural water productivity at the plant and field level, where the primary stakeholder is the farmer. Thus, we will concentrate on crop water productivity (CWP), defined as the agronomic yield per unit of water used in transpiration, evapotranspiration (ET), or applied (including precipitated) water. This concept is equally valid for irrigated and rainfed systems and thus also provides a vehicle for exploring water-use options at the basin scale, where a variety of systems and options for development exist.Increasing agricultural water productivity can significantly reduce the total amount of water we will need in the future to produce food. Thus, agricultural water productivity estimates are an important component in scenarios that have been explored to try to estimate future water requirements. For example, under a base scenario that included optimistic assumptions on yield increases and efficiency, Seckler et al. (1998) estimated a 29% increase in irrigated land would be required by the year 2025 to produce enough food to feed the population. But because of gains in water productivity, the increase in water diversions to agriculture would only need to be 17%. FAO (2002aFAO ( , 2003a,b) ,b) and Shiklomanov (1998) had comparable results. FAO (2002b) estimated a 34% increase in irrigated area and a 12% increase in irrigation diversions, and similarly Shiklomanov (1998) projected a 27% increase in irrigated diversions. More recently, scenarios taking into account both irrigated and rainfed agriculture projected that 30-40% more water will be used in agriculture by 2050 than is used today (De Fraiture et al., 2007). This optimistic scenario was based on the assumption of balanced investments in water management in rainfed and irrigated areas, and increased water productivity. Without improved water management the overall increase is projected to be 70-90%. Because of the importance of rainfed agricultural production now and in the future, we are interested in water productivity in both irrigated and rainfed systems.A fundamental but somewhat technical discussion is required to understand how CWP can be improved. For a given crop variety, there is a near linear relationship between plant biomass (leaves, stems, roots, grain, etc.) and transpiration (Tanner and Sinclair, 1983), depending on plant variety and climate (Steduto and Albrizio, 2005). Since the mid-1960s, breeding strategies that increase the harvest index (the proportion of grain to total biomass) have resulted in larger increases in water productivity than any other agronomic practice. These gains, however, are not based on a decrease in transpiration per unit of biomass produced, but instead on an increase in the proportion of biomass that is marketable or consumable produce (usually grain). Thus, the amount of biomass per unit transpiration has not changed through breeding strategies that increase harvest index. This illustrates the perceived 'biological imperative' that to produce more biomass, more water is required for transpiration. Given that it is now thought that the scope for further increases in harvest index seems small, even with biotechnology (Bennett, 2003), where might we identify opportunities to continue to increase water productivity in agriculture?The difference between actual water productivity and this limit represented by plant physi-ology demonstrates the enormous opportunities to increase water productivity. Taking wheat as an example, Fig. 2.1 shows the significant variation that exists in CWP (Sadras and Angus, 2006). The solid line in Fig. 2.1 may represent the biological limits along which increased biomass production requires increases in water use, while most systems surveyed achieved much lower water productivity. The mechanisms to achieve improvement are related to reducing evaporative losses of water or increasing transpiration efficiency, both of which can decrease ET per unit of biomass produced, thus increasing water productivity. Both of these factors can be strongly affected by land management and soil quality. In particular, increased infiltration rates and soil water-holding capacity can reduce evaporative losses, and soil fertility improvement can increase transpiration efficiency. Understanding a simple water balance of a typical farm helps guide an analysis of where opportunities lie to increase water productivity. Water which either falls as precipitation or is applied to any particular field can have several fates: transpiration, evaporation, storage or drainage (Fig. 2.2). Storage and drainage water can still be used productively either on-site or downstream, and is not 'lost' unless its quality declines (through, for example, being drained off into a saline aquifer). Evaporation, however, is a significant by-product of agricultural practices, and does not contribute to biomass production. Evaporation depends on climate (thus CWP is generally higher at northern latitudes with lower temperatures) and soil shading (by leaves of the crop canopy), and can thus be high in rainfed systems in the tropics, with high temperatures and low plant densities. In degraded tropical systems, evaporation is even higher, as infiltration into the soil and soil waterholding capacity are reduced, runoff is rapid and plant densities are very low. Transpired water can also be wasted if crop failure occurs after significant biomass growth. Thus, practices that reduce evaporation and prevent crop failure, such as mulching and fertilizer to increase soil water retention, plant vigour and leaf expansion can significantly increase CWP. Losses due to pests also limit harvestable yields, and hence managing these limitations can also increase water productivity.Transpiration efficiency -the biomass produced per unit of water transpired -is also highly dependent on soil nutrient availability. In fact, it has only recently been appreciated that the linear relationship between transpiration and biomass production only holds at a constant level of nutrient availability. Soil degradation therefore, particularly poor soil fertility, is a primary cause of low water productivity. A recent modelling study by one of us (Nangia), undertaken to understand the role of nitrogen fertilizer in enhancing water productivity, particularly highlights the role of soil nutrient availability as a determinant of water productivity. While a lot of agronomic studies have been conducted investigating crop response to nutrients and water, they were primarily aimed at understanding land productivity and not water productivity. This work, aimed at bridging this gap, concluded that more biomass and harvestable products can be produced per unit of transpired water given adequate nitrogen availability (Fig. 2.3), and that maximizing water productivity was not equivalent to maximizing land productivity. The improvement is most successful when trying to raise productivity from very low levels, such as are common in many degraded rainfed farming systems.The basis for understanding how much CWP can still be improved in practice is provided by a few recent reviews that have quantified CWP variability in irrigated and rainfed systems.These reviews indicate that significant improvement to CWP can be achieved. On irrigated land, Zwart and Bastiaanssen (2004) estimated the variability in WP for major crops based on measurements of actual ET on fields across five continents (Table 2.2) from 84 published studies conducted since the early 1980s. This variability, often up to threefold differences between low and high water productivity, is encouraging since it gives an idea of the tremendous potential that exists to increase CWP. These authors concluded that, if constraints were removed, increases of 20-40% in CWP could easily be achieved. The variation was primarily attributed to climate, irrigation water management and soil management. Similarly, Fig. 2.1 demonstrates the significant variation in CWP for wheat (Sadras and Angus, 2006). In semi-arid zones of sub-Saharan Africa Falkenmark and Rockström (2004) found CWP for maize, sorghum and millet to range from about 2.5 to 15 kg/mm water per/ha. As with Zwart and Bastiaanssen (2004), improving soil management was one of several factors identified that affect CWP.This gap between actual water productivity and potential is largest in rainfed farming systems in semi-arid areas. Falkenmark and Rockström (2004) review the theory and data supporting the significant opportunities that exist to improve water productivity in these rainfed systems. They highlight the tremendous potential to shift from unproductive evaporative losses to productive transpiration. Figure 2.4 shows the relationship between actual CWP as measured by ET and grain produced across a large range of sites in sub-Saharan Africa. Hatfield et al. (2001) support this conclusion, based on an extensive review of studies that examined the potential of soil management practices alone to improve water-use efficiency. Hatfield et al. (2001) estimated that CWP could be increased by 25-40% through soil management practices, such as 'no till', to improve infiltration and soil water storage, and between 15 and 25% with nutrient management. summarizes the idea that, although the biological relationship between water use and biomass may be linear, soil management could significantly push the line towards increased production at the same level of water use, such as illustrated in detail for wheat (Fig. 2.1). Likewise, poor soil management and soil limitations move the line down, limiting water productivity.In another recent review of case studies of resource-conserving agriculture projects (Pretty et al., 2006), it was estimated that improvement in water productivity ranged from 70 to 100% in rainfed systems, and 15 to 30% in irrigated systems (Table 2.3). These estimates were made based on reported crop yields and average potential evapotranspiration (ETp) for each project location during the relevant growing season. Actual evapotranspiration (ETa) was assumed to equal 80% of ETp, and ETa to remain a constant at different levels of productivity. Impacts are attributed primarily to land management changes such as removing limitations on productivity by enhancing soil fertility, and reducing soil evaporation through conservation tillage. The variability was high due to the wide variety of practices represented in the dataset, but do demonstrate gains in WP are possible through the adoption of sustainable farming technologies in a variety of crops and farm systems (Bossio et al., forthcoming).A few detailed field studies from Australia, Africa and Asia serve to highlight these potential impacts. Smith et al.'s (2000) careful study demonstrated this shift from evaporation to transpiration as influenced by soil fertility in a rainfed wheat/lucerne production system in New South Wales, Australia. By increasing fertilizer (i.e. nitrogen) inputs, they were able to demonstrate increases in water productivity of wheat grain as measured by crop evapotranspiration from 8.4 to 14.6 kg/mm of water (Table 2.4). Some interesting trends can be gleaned from these results on improving the CWP of rainfed production systems when limited by the fertility status of the soil. In annual cropping systems, evaporation decreases and transpiration increases with increasing leaf area. As a consequence, the total amount of water consumed through the sum of evaporation and transpiration (ET) in a crop with low leaf area may be similar to that consumed in a crop with high leaf area. In this case, ET of 404 and 439 mm, respectively, was measured between these two contrasting crops. This study therefore clearly demonstrates that it is erroneous to assume that the water use of a high biomass crop will be proportionately greater than that of a low biomass crop, when leaf areas are very different (Smith et al., 2000). In this case, a doubling of grain yield only required a further 35 mm of ET (less than 10% increase) (Table 2.4).Field results from a low-yielding rainfed system in Africa (Barron and Okwach, 2005) demonstrated that water productivity could be dramatically increased and also highlighted the importance of synergistic water and nutrient management to achieve this impact on farmers' fields. Water productivity in a smallholder maize production system in semi-arid Africa was increased from 2.1 to 4.1 kg grain/mm/ha, almost a 100% increase, by using supplemental irrigation to mitigate dry spells. But this increase was only achieved when supplemental irrigation was applied in combination with nitrogen fertilizer (Barron and Okwach, 2005).In cases where soil chemical and physical degradation is extreme, rehabilitation of degraded soils can have an even greater impact, as demonstrated in recent studies on rainfed production systems in north-east Thailand (Noble et al., 2004). Sandy soils in NE Thailand have severe nutrient and carbon depletion after 40 or more years of agricultural production. Low nutrient-supplying capacity, poor water-holding capacity and the presence of a compacted layer at 20-30 cm are the dominant constraints to ensuring yield stability under rainfed conditions. Crop failure is now the norm owing to the extremely low availability of both nutrients and water. Annual precipitation is about 1100 mm, and sufficient for rainfed farming. Adding fertilizers or supplemental irrigation cannot stabilize yields, owing to the soil's very low capacity to retain water and nutrients. A novel approach of adding clay materials to these soils has ensured yield stability, as well as significantly enhancing crop yields (Noble et al., 2004;Noble and Suzuki, 2005). A measure of water productivity in these studies was estimated from the biomass produced per unit of rainfall over the growing season. Water productivity increased from a mere 0.32 kg/mm under the degraded situation to 14.74 kg/mm where constraints such as low nutrient supplies and water-holding capacity were addressed through the application of clay-based materials. These dramatic results are partly attributed to a 28% increase in soil water-holding capacity (Noble and Suzuki, 2005).The primary focus of this chapter has been CWP at field level and the opportunities that exist to improve CWP by mitigating soil degradation through improved land management.We have demonstrated that the potential gain in water productivity through land management interventions, particularly to improve soil quality, is large and, we suggest, generally underappreciated. Various studies estimate that water productivity in irrigated systems could be improved by between 20 and 40%, primarily through land management approaches. In rainfed systems in developing countries, where average crop production is very low and many soils suffer from nutrient depletion, erosion and other degradation problems, potential improvement in water productivity is even higher, and may be as high as 100% in many systems. This is particularly important given that a large share of the needed increases in food production will have to come from rainfed systems.We have emphasized the importance of reducing real losses in the water balance, such as evaporation, by improving soil physical properties, and increasing transpiration efficiency through improved nutrient management as the key entry points through which desired improvements in water productivity can be achieved. This point is particularly important in the watershed or landscape context. If increases in biomass production on site are achieved simply by using more water, without reducing unproductive losses or increasing transpiration efficiency (i.e. water productivity remains constant), this would then simply represent an increased diversion of water from runoff or deep percolation to biomass production on site. This type of diversion would be a reallocation of water that may have been valuable downstream either to maintain aquatic ecosystems or for other productive purposes in a different location. It is not necessarily an increase in water productivity at the landscape or basin scale if water is simply used in a different location. The important entry point for water productivity improvement at larger scales is to reduce real losses of water that occur through evaporation, losses to saline sinks, ineffective transpiration, or useless transpiration resulting from crop failure.The diverse set of studies discussed above clearly demonstrate that improved land management is a very promising way to increase water productivity, particularly in lowyielding rainfed systems. To put this in perspective, the recent Comprehensive Assessment on Water Management in Agriculture reviewed the opportunities to improve agricultural water productivity and found that alternatives such as genetic improvements can be expected to yield only moderate water productivity improvements, although genetic improvements may play an important role in reducing the risk of crop failure (Molden et al., 2007). Synergistic interventions, including improved water management and maintenance of soil quality, have the greatest potential to improve water productivity. There is every indication, therefore, that investing in the rehabilitation of degraded agricultural lands should be taken up as a priority in efforts to mitigate the 'water crisis'. There are additional gains to be had in such an intervention, including maintenance of terrestrial ecosystems, and also the preservation of aquatic ecosystems and their accompanying services, all of which are linked directly to how agricultural land is managed and maintained."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2084675142.json b/main/part_2/2084675142.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d8bdc01daec7d9dc63206e05dae58ec6260ead86 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2084675142.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4c69384c96d8ba693fa57b4b907152cd","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3b8abff4-624a-422e-8ca9-15fd1f0ab723/retrieve","id":"604102546"},"keywords":["cassava starch","fried matrices","quality attributes","soy protein isolate"],"sieverID":"d5b8f0c3-21ec-46f9-abda-7c70b3970cb2","content":"Snack industry is recently focused on the production of snacks with minimal oil content and enhanced quality attributes which prompted the need to study the changes in snack matrices produced from cassava starch processed from three varieties of cassava roots and soy protein isolate blends fried in soybean oil. Effect of frying temperature (170-180°C), frying time (2-4 min), soy protein isolate inclusion level (5%-15%) on proximate composition, color changes, expansion, texture, and sensory attributes of the snacks was investigated. Optimization of process variables was carried out based on a factorial design (2 level by 3 factor) in the Design Expert version 6.0.8, and models were generated showing the relationship between the independent variables and the responses. The desired goal for each constraint (processing conditions) was kept within 170-180°C for 2-4 min, while all responses, except chewiness, expansion, yellowness, and protein, were set at minimum. Evaluation of sensory attributes of the optimized sample was carried out to determine its level of desirability. The optimized frying conditions for matrices produced from starches of TMS-950289 are 170°C/4 min/5% SPI with desirability value of 0.507; from TME-419 are 180°C/2 min/5% SPI with desirability value of 0.475 while for those from TMS-30572 are 170°C/4 min/15% SPI with desirability value of 0.459. At higher SPI level, the protein content was high at 170°C. At 4 min frying time for all the varieties, the moisture content reduces. The most desired optimized fried snack produced from starch of TMS-30572 (containing 15% SPI) had higher crispness and lower oil content than other optimized fried snacks.Snacks are foods manufactured from combination of various ingredients to meet certain nutritional requirements. Kareem et al. (2015) reported that they are often consumed between meals or in place of regular meals while studying some quality attributes of high-quality cassava-tigernut composite flour and its extruded snacks. Typically, snacks are expected to add to the nutritional intake of individuals and are commonly produced from locally sourced raw materials for easy accessibility and availability. Minimal variations are expected from snacks produced from each frying experiment to the other as reported by Gazmuri and Bouchon (2009). Therefore, there is need to formulate snacks to promote reproducibility, minimize defects, and maintain uniformity in final products. Majorly, wheat is used largely in snacks and pastries due to its uniqueness in providing elasticity property-a function of its gluten, an important constitutent necessary for dough formation. Unfortunately, soy protein does not contain gluten which supports dough formation; nevertheless, its behavior during snacks production needs to be examined to know whether it also exhibits elasticity property that aids dough formation. However, it is necessary to evaluate the matrices formed during the development of an acceptable snack from locally available raw materials. Cassava is grown extensively for its starchy root which is a major source of carbohydrates. Starch is the main ingredient responsible for the expansion and crispness of snacks as reported by Taewee (2011) and is used as thickener in foods that are not subject to rigorous processing conditions. Cassava starch is known to have excellent textural characteristics, high paste viscosity, and clarity. It has a bland or neutral taste which promotes its use in snacks production. Abioye, Ade-Omowaye, Babarinde, and Adesigbin (2011) stated that soybean (Glycine max) is a cheap source of quality protein that is superior to all other plant foods because it has good balance of the essential amino acids and contains reasonable amount of methionine. It can be processed to obtain different products such as soy concentrate, soy flour, soy milk, soy cake, and soybean oil. The oil is extracted from its seeds as a clean oil with little or no perceived odor, and it is low in saturated fat, contains no transfat, and is high in mono and polyunsaturated fats. Soybean oil is people's most favorite choice as edible oil because of its quality, functionality, low cost and also, for being precursors of Omega-3, Omega-6, and Vitamin E according to Mounts et al. (1986). Frying process is complex, and it involves many factors, some of which are dependent on the process itself, and others on the food and type of fat used (Saguy & Pinthus, 1995). Deep fat frying adds some unique characteristics to develop snacks with smooth mouth feel, distinct flavor, color, texture, and palatability (Adedeji & Ngadi, 2009). It is one of the most important processes in the preparation of frozen prefried foods, snacks, and fast foods. Desired sensory attributes such as crispiness, crunchy texture, yellowness, and flavor are developed during deep fat frying. According to Franke and Reimerdes(2007), these properties are controlled by the maillard reaction and fat absorption, respectively. Sánchez-Gimeno, Negueruela, Benito, Vercet, and Oria (2008) reported that the quality of the products cooked by deep fat frying depends not only on the frying conditions such as frying temperature, frying time, food weight, and frying oil volume, but also on oil types and kind of food materials used. Therefore, the objective of this work is to characterize the snacks produced from cassava starch and soy protein isolate blends fried in soybean oil.Three varieties of cassava roots TMS-30572, TMS-950289, and TME-419 were obtained from Cassava breeding unit, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. The cassava roots were processed to starch at their processing unit. Soy protein isolate, a light yellow powder, was obtained from NutriChem company and soybean oil from Shoprite, Ikeja, Lagos. Knife, bowls, deep fryer, and other materials were obtained from the food processing laboratory, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta. Nigeria.Starch was extracted from freshly harvested roots using the modified procedure of Aseidu (1989). The cassava roots were weighed immediately after harvesting from farm and they were peeled, washed and grated, and the screened starch was allowed to settle and decanted. The final product was packaged in an airtight ziplock bag to prevent moisture and air intake from the atmosphere.Dough samples were prepared using modified method of Gazmuri and Bouchon (2009). The samples were weighed at the right proportions and mixed in a bowl, and 72 ml of hot water (100°C) was added to 100 g of sample to form a dough. The dough was rolled, kneaded, and cut out to get accurate shape (diameter 10 cm and height 0.25 cm) with a cutter.Sheeted dough was cut into round shape diameter 10 cm and height 0.25 cm) and fried in the inner frying compartment of a fryer using deep fat frying technique (SAISHO,China). A lid was used to cover the inner frying compartment while frying was taking place to ensure maximum submersion in the oil. Frying was carried out by dipping the covered frying baskets in the oil that have been maintained at 170 and 180°C for 2 and 4 min. The samples were removed, drained of any surface oil, and then held in a clean stainless flat surface to cool after each frying batch, before packaging in Ziploc packaging films until further use.A three-factor experimental setup was used with frying temperature, frying time, and cassava starch and soy protein isolate (CS:SPI) as the independent factors at two levels each as shown in Table 1. The data obtained were analyzed by factorial methodology based on general factorial design (Table 2) to optimize process variables. Eight combinations were generated in random order according to the design.The fried snacks produced were analyzed for moisture, ash, and oil according to AOAC (2000), and the protein content was analyzed using Kjedahl method (AACC, 46-12.01). The carbohydrate content was obtained by calculating the difference from the sum total.Expansion was determined using the procedures of Maeda and Cereda (2001). Each dough was measured with a vernier caliper before and after frying to determine its diameter. Expansion was then calculated as the difference between the initial diameter before and the final diameter after frying. Values reported are mean of six measurements for each frying operation.Chewiness and hardness of the chips were measured using a Universal Testing Machine (Model:M500-100ATCapacity:100kN, Stable Micro Systems Ltd., Godalming, Surrey UK). Texture parameters (Chewiness [N] and Hardness [N]) were obtained by placing the fried samples on the texture analyzer and using the compressor probe at Probe Diameter (mm): 60 Deformation (%): 2.1 mm for each texture parameter (Da Silva & Moreira, 2008).The color intensity of the snacks was determined using a chromameter colour measuring system (Konica Minolta CR-410, Minolta LTD, Japan) as described by Mariscal and Bouchon (2008). Acceptance testing method described by Omidiran et al. (2016) was used to investigate the acceptability of the fried snacks prepared using the optimized frying conditions. Fifty students of Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria were engaged as consumer panelists, and they evaluated the sweetness, expansion, crispness, oiliness, color, appearance, and overall acceptance of fried snack. Each sample attribute was rated using a ninepoint Hedonic Scale. The values reported are mean of scores for each attribute, and a radar chart was used to illustrate the results.A 2 3 general factorial design was used to study the effect and optimize of independent variables namely frying temperature (170 and 180°C), frying time (2 and 4 min), and soy protein isolate (SPI) level (5% and 15%) on some quality attributes of the fried snacks as shown in Tables 1 and 2.The protein content ranged from 3.22% to 6.47%, 2.84% to 6.78%, 3.03% to 6.45%; oil content ranged from 9.10% to 10.02, 7.90% to 10.12%, 8.45% to 9.77%, and moisture content ranged from 6.89% to 18.67%, 8.25% to 19.67%, 8.06% to 19.75% for snacks from starches of TMS-950289, TME-419, and TMS-30572, respectively, as shown in Tables 1, 3, and 4, respectively. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) ranged from 0.67 to 0.99, and there were significant (p < 0.05) differences in the protein content as presented in Table 5. High protein content observed in the snacks could be due to the level of soy protein isolate that was supplemented intoFrying temperature ( °C) 170 180Frying time (min) 2 4Level of SPI (%) 5 15 observed in this study that the higher the frying time, the lower the moisture content. So therefore, products fried at 4 min tend to be crunchier. The cube model graphs for the snacks produced from the three varieties are presented in Figures 1-3 showing the relationship with each quality parameter.The mean values of chewiness ranged from 1. of the snacks which is the most desired attributes of crisps and chips that denotes freshness and high quality. At higher frying temperature and time, texture also reduced with increased level of SPI. There were no significant effects on the chewiness and hardness of the fried snacks.The mean value of expansion ranged from 5.13 to 18.44 mm for fried snacks from starches of TMS-950289. The model for expansion had the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) value of 0.99 and Fvalue of 1,363.65. Frying time significantly (p < 0.05) affected the expansion positively, and SPI significantly (p < 0.05) affected the expansion negatively. Furthermore, the interaction between frying temperature and SPI, and frying time and SPI had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on the expansion of TMS-950289 negatively. The mean value of the expansion ranged from 5.74 to 11.86 mm for fried snacks from starches of TME-419. The model for expansion had the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) value of 0.98 and F-value of 6.97 as presented in Table 6. For fried snacks from starches of TMS-30572, the mean value of the expansion ranged from 3.28 to 12.95 mm, and the model for expansion had the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) value of 0.99 and F-value of 64.60. However, the interaction of frying time and SPI had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on the expansion of TMS-30572 as presented in Table 7 substitution level reduced the expansion of the fried snacks. Gazmuri and Bouchon (2009) and Sobukola, Babajide, and Ogunsade (2012) while working on fabricated matrices from wheat starch and gluten reported that products containing high amount of gluten and water tend to expand during frying with the gluten content of the matrix developing an elastic structure that traps water vapor producing an expanded product. This is also supported by the report of Omidiran et al. (2016) on the expansion of fried snacks from blends of wheat flour and brewers' spent cassava flour. (Marquez & Anon, 2000). As the frying temperature increased, the lightness parameter of the fried product decreased, whereas the redness and yellowness parameters increased for the same frying time. This is similar to the reports of Krokida &Oreopoulou, 2000 andMoyano, Vioseco, &Gonzalez, 2002. Lightness value of fried snacks decreased with increase in frying temperature, frying time, and level of SPI, while redness and yellowness values increased.Chewiness, expansion, yellowness, and protein content were maximized for each varieties, while hardness, lightness, redness, oil content, and moisture content were minimized for fried snacks from each varieties. Frying temperature of 170°C, frying time of 4 min, and level of SPI of 5% with a desirability of 0.507 were selected for TMS-950289. Frying temperature of 180°C, frying time of 2 min, and level of SPI of 5% with a desirability of 0.475 were selected for TMEB-419. Frying temperature of 170°C, frying time of 4 min, and level of SPI of 15% with a desirability of 0.459 were selected for TMS-30572, and an optimized sample was prepared under these conditions.TA B L E 7 Regression coefficient of the responses as a function of the independent variables of TMS-30572 "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2096454486.json b/main/part_2/2096454486.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eccb2b52f308c15c34e0e865d5f7091ce6d3e547 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2096454486.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ed2eeb0d6863a585166ce75ca284bd7d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6bf554a4-e262-44c1-bda4-40d025023822/retrieve","id":"1486144752"},"keywords":["Front cover, page 9, Ahmed Elewa/WorldFish","pages 18, 19, Ahmed Nasr-Allah/WorldFish","pages 8, 10, Ibrahim Elsira/WorldFish","pages 13, 15, WorldFish"],"sieverID":"e4aef50a-a722-4bf1-86ab-18a493bae610","content":"This guide explains the integration between fish culture and conventional crop agriculture and discusses how farmers can maximize benefits from using these resources. 1 The main concept for any system of integration is that the outputs of one organism or system function as a source of inputs for another organism or system. For fish farmers, this concept applies to the relationship between fish and crops, as the outputs of the fish can be a rich source of nutrients for crops.An integrated aquaculture-agriculture system has the following advantages:• Taking water used for fish farming and reusing it to irrigate crops optimizes water use.• Aquaculture-agriculture integration is environmentally friendly, as crops benefit from the nutrients in the water. This minimizes the amount of additional fertilizers and thus cost. Using nutrients discharged from fish culture units also helps reduce environmental impact.• Producing fish in remote and rural areas, away from traditional fish farming and fishing sites, reduces transportation costs and provides fresh fish for consumers.• A small-scale farm can use this system for either home or local consumption, or both, as it is possible to produce more than one agricultural product in a relatively remote areas where getting fresh animal food may not be available.• It is possible to produce organic food products that have a higher market value compared to traditional crops as fish generate organic fertilizer waste to that can be used in crop fertilization.This guide focuses on integration between fish and crops. However, farmers can introduce several other models, including livestock and poultry, in proportion to their integrated system to maximize benefits from all outputs and to increase profitability (Figure 1). When designing an integrated aquaculture-agriculture farm, it is important to consider the water requirements for growing crops, the volume of the fish culture unit and the targeted fish production.Water source Agricultural activity depends on the land and water characteristics as well as the supply and demand for various crops. This affects the choice of crop composition from one farm to another.Water requirements for land vary according to the crops grown. In an integrated aquacultureagriculture system, farmers first need to determine how much water their crops require daily. Based on this, they can then go ahead and design their fish farming system accordingly.For large crops, farmers can diversify their crops to maximize their use of resources. Usually, they can add an animal production component to the farm by allocating part of the land for animal husbandry and associated foraging crops, as needed. This will diversify their income sources and maximize returns on agricultural activity. For newly reclaimed sandy lands, it is best to focus on economical agricultural crops.In areas where water availability is uncertain, farmers must build reservoirs for irrigation. This is important in places that depend on distant water sources or pumped groundwater, or when the water recedes at times. A reservoir provides farmers with sustainable irrigation for their crops. It is possible to establish and exploit these reservoirs in harmony with fish farming in order to maximize the benefits and other advantages, as listed in this section.In integrated aquaculture-agriculture systems, the types of crops farmers can cultivate depend on the location and the surrounding environment, in addition to fish production. For example, intercropping is a method in which fruit crops are grown with vegetables and field crops. Table 1 lists crops that are suitable for integrated farming systems in Egypt. In irrigation water, the salinity concentration affects the quality of crops that can be cultivated. Some crops, such as mangoes and vegetables, are sensitive to salinity in water, while other crops, likeSuitability for irrigation <160 This is suitable for irrigating all crops in every type of land.This is suitable for irrigating low saline sensitive crops.This is suitable for irrigating low saline sensitive crops, provided the cultivated land has a good drainage system and allows enough water to wash away any salt residue in the roots.This is suitable for irrigating well-drained sandy land, if the amount of water used is increased each time and farmers choose crops that can tolerate the salinity ratio.This water is not good for irrigation, especially drip irrigation. However, it can be used after mixing it with fresh water to reduce its salinity. The drip-spills localized irrigation systems can be used up to 7000 ppm.Table 2. Salt concentration in water and its suitability for irrigation.olives and pomegranates, can tolerate high levels.Table 2 shows the relationship between the total salt concentration in water and its suitability for irrigation purposes.Water requirements for agricultural crops vary depending on the following factors:• Some crops need more water than others.• The age of the crop is important, because most crops need less water at the beginning of their growth than in later stages, so the water requirements of the crop have to be met at each stage.• The higher the salt concentration, the more water the crop requires.• Weather and climate conditions in each region, such as humidity and wind speed, are important.• The type and nature of changes in soil affect crops differently.Many other factors affect the water requirements of agricultural crops. In general, however, the average amount of water needed to irrigate an acre of agricultural land is 25-50 m 3 per day.As the water requirements for different agricultural crops vary, farmers can refer to the characteristics of agricultural crops that show the period of their growth, season and average amount of water needed, as shown in Tables 5-7 in the Appendix. Before referring to these tables, farmers should consider the following:• The tables show the water requirements for the agricultural crop and not the irrigation needs, so farmers must adjust them based on the efficiency of the irrigation method they are using.• Water requirements vary when several crops are intercropped with each other, so farmers should seek out an expert's opinion on agricultural crops.• The irrigation method used affects the irrigation requirements of the crop. As such, it is better to use modern irrigation methods, as they are more efficient (Figure 2) and help conserve and maximize water use.Some might think that farming and aquaculture are not possible in arid areas because of a lack of water and land that can support such activities. However, some factors can make these activities possible, and even favorable:• In many areas, there is enough well water or groundwater in the desert to have sufficient reserves to support farming and fish culture, and related activities.• Water treatment facilities that make water reusable will prolong farming activities.• Aquaculture is considered a method of land reclamation.• Water discharged from fish ponds is rich in nutrients that can support the poor soil of the desert.Of course, this does not mean that farmers should rush to farm in the desert, as there are important factors to consider:• Farmers should get a soil and water analysis to determine their suitability for aquaculture and agriculture.• They must know the changes in climate and weather.• It is important for them to determine the best methods to save and conserve water.Usually, government institutes periodically release documents about weather and climate changes and soil and water properties in different regions.They even go as far as recommending areas that are best suited for reclamation and the water requirements for each crop. Farmers can simply follow these instructions and save themselves the cost of getting an analysis and avoiding the risks that come with experimental farming.4. Agriculture and aquaculture in arid areasThere are four main methods that farmers can use for irrigating agricultural crops: surface irrigation (flood irrigation), pressurized irrigation (drip and sprinkler irrigation), subsurface irrigation and localized irrigation.The most common of these are flood irrigation and drip and sprinkler irrigation. For integrated farming systems, it is best to avoid flood irrigation, as it is the least efficient method (Figure 2).Sprinkler irrigation is preferred for field crops such as alfalfa, wheat and barley, while localized drip irrigation is best for spaced crops, such as trees, beetroot, corn and vegetables. These methods are much more efficient than the others.For integrated fish farming systems, farmers should follow these instructions to avoid problems that can arise when using advanced irrigation methods:• Use a separate sedimentation tank (Figure 3) to collect water for irrigating crops. The water is drawn from the bottom of the culture tank into the sedimentation tank, where precipitated waste is located, to avoid harming the fish.• Place nets over the canal pipes that connect the two tanks. The size of the mesh should be large enough to allow solid waste to pass between the two tanks, but small enough that the fish cannot pass through. The water used for irrigation is drawn from the top layer of the sedimentation tank to avoid sediment at the bottom that could block the pipes.• Use a mechanical filter to remove residual sediment in the water. Farmers can use chemical compounds to dissolve suspended solids and sediment to avoid blocking pipes or sprinklers. They can also collect any sediment that has settled at the bottom of the tank and use it as fertilizer for plants. For example, phosphoric acid has a dual-purpose. It is used to clean out irrigation hoses while at the same time acting as a fertilizer for plants, as it is a good source of phosphorous.The following are concerns that farmers should take into account regarding irrigation in integrated aquaculture-agriculture systems:• Drip and sprinkler methods require highly efficient filters to maintain the irrigation system.• Sometimes, the drained water from the fish tanks is more than what the crops need.• Water drained from the fish tanks contains a high percentage of dissolved nitrogen, which is an essential element for crops at the start of their growth period. However, agricultural crops need other elements for growth in the following stages, the most important being calcium, phosphorus and potassium. These elements, in their dissolved form, can be added to the irrigation water to compensate for its deficiency.• The water used must be suitable for the type of crop and fish species cultured.• The effect of enriched water on crops might not have observable results in the first planting season, because the elements are stored in the soil over time. The effect of these fertilizers appears in the following seasons. This is known as the land storage effect.• Farmers must be flexible when using water.For some crops, they should stop irrigating their crops in winter and for pre-harvest fasting. They should also consider draining the water from their fish tanks directly into the drainage canal.• Farmers can use water that is relatively high in salt (3000-7500 ppm) to cultivate crops that can tolerate salinity, such as olives, pomegranates and palm trees. However, they must chose a type of farmed fish that can tolerate the same salinity. As such, farmers must take into account that continuous irrigation could raise the salinity level in the soil. To overcome this problem, farmers are advised to consult an irrigation specialist.Fish tankFigure 3. A fish tank and sedimentation tank, with a mesh net at the entrance of the pipe connecting the two tanks.6. Designing a fish culture unitThe size of the fish culture unit and the expected production capacity must be proportional to the area of agricultural land intended for use and its water requirements. The size of the pond should be neither too big that it results in a lower rate of water exchange, nor too small that it affects the volume of water available for the fish. The more farmers can increase the exchange rate, the better it is for fish growth.The size of the culture unit affects two important factors: the water exchange rate and the sustainable volume of water.The rate of water exchange increases in small units compared to large ones. The higher the rate, the better it is for fish growth. The sustainable volume of water is the amount that must be maintained at all times in order to preserve the lives of the fish.The sustainable volume will be as large as the size of the culturing unit, so farmers have to determine the size of the culture unit to maintain the balance between these two factors.For optimal water use efficiency, the volume of the fish culture tank may vary according to an average daily water use for crops of m 3 /day. For example, for five acres of land, with a daily water use rate per acre of 20 m 3 /acre for irrigation, a water tank of 100-200 m 3 is optimum bearing in mind that the water depth suitable for tilapia culture ranges from 1 to 2 m.Fishponds are built for two reasons: for growing fish or as a water reservoir for irrigating cropcultivated land. There are two main types of ponds: concrete and plastic-lined.Concrete ponds are better for sandy soil that cannot retain water for a long time. These ponds can be square, rectangular, circular or another shape. Circular is best.Rectangular or square ponds are best for large areas of land, as they leave more space for fish farming.However, they are less efficient from the perspectives of management, drainage and waste removal. Circular or octagonal ponds are considered the best, because they are easier to manage and to remove waste. The advantage of octagonal ponds is that they aerate the water better because they have eight angles and are easier to build than circular ponds.With rectangular and square tanks, it is better to irrigate from the top of the tank to stir the water better, while drainage should come from the opposite side of the tank to remove solid waste at the bottom. Drainage in circular tanks differs from the traditional method, as these tanks slope toward the center where the drainage hole is. The slope helps stir the water inside the tank so that it is easier to collect and get rid of waste.Plate 1. Rectangular polyethylene-lined pond.Photo credit: Ahmed Nasr-Allah/WorldFishPlate 2. Circular concrete pond.Photo credit: Ibrahim Elsira/WorldFishFor this type of pond, a sheet of polyethylene is used to cover the entire bottom. Like concrete ponds, these ponds are used for sandy soil that cannot retain water. However, plastic-lined ponds are less expensive than concrete ponds. They are also suitable for relatively large areas, and they lower the amount of water that leaks into the soil.A high density, 1000 micron thick polyethylene tarpaulin has a shelf life of 10 years. The soil has to be free of any gravel or sharp edges that could puncture the tarpaulin and lead to water leaks. Never use sharp tools or materials that could puncture the plastic layer.When building a fishpond, another option is to use bricks topped with a layer of cement to cover the dikes and the bottom. This technique is relatively less expensive than concrete ponds, but farmers should consult a specialist before starting construction. Farmers should consider the following when designing a fishpond:• Make the best use of uneven ground surfaces, as the level of the ground will affect both irrigation and drainage (Figure 4).Plate 3. A pond lined with plastic.Photo credit: Ahmed Elewa/WorldFish• When designing a fishpond, direct the drainage water straight into the drainage canal so that the water can be changed regularly, regardless of whether it is needed for irrigation. When irrigation water is needed, use the drainage water. When irrigation water is not needed, drain the water directly into the drainage canal.• When building irrigation and drainage canals, use water from the top for irrigation (Figure 4) to stir the water more and to increase the level of dissolved oxygen (DO). For drainage, use water from the bottom, where waste accumulates.Plate 4. Using irrigation water from the top of a pond.• Make sure the bottom slopes toward the drainage canal to make it easier to drain the water and collect waste. Ensure the irrigation inlet is opposite the drainage outlet.• Build a canal around the pond and connect it to the pond to circulate the water. The movement of the water in the canal will cause waste to precipitate and increase the water quality so that it can be reused. Clear the canal of sediment regularly.Many fish species are suitable for farming. In Egypt, Nile tilapia and African catfish are among the most common and widespread species. They are suitable for integrated aquaculture-agriculture systems for the following reasons:• They can tolerate low levels of DO in water longer than other species. They also can tolerate high rates of intensification.• They are in demand at the markets year-round.• Seed is available for almost the whole year.• They grow fast and can tolerate changes in environmental conditions better than other species.The culture season for both tilapia and catfish starts when the temperature rises, from March until November. The length of the culture season increases or decreases according to the location, climate and weather.It is better to culture large fingerlings to avoid high losses that occur with seed. Fingerlings also produce a higher percentage of ammonia than seeds. Ammonia is an important factor for crops, especially at the beginning of the planting season, which requires high amounts of nitrogen.The fish source must be reliable and trustworthy. For Nile tilapia, all male fingerlings are better, because they grow faster and do not reproduce in the pond.Farms can start a culture cycle based on the average productivity in farms where the water and weather conditions are similar. For example, if the average production in a neighboring farm is 10 kg/m 3 , and the average size of the resulting fish is 500 g per fish, then it is possible to calculate the stocking rate as follows:First, calculate the biomass of the harvested fish at the end of the season:• The number of fish per kilogram multiplied by the number of kilograms expected to be harvested per cubic meter. For example, if there are 2 fish/kg and 10 kg of fish/m 3 are expected, then the number of harvested fish would be 20/m 3 (2 X 10 = 20 fish/m 3 ).Second, calculate the survival rate during the season:• The survival rate is based on several factors, the most important of which is fish size. The larger the fish, the lower the mortality rate. For example, if the weight of the fish when cultured is more than 20 g (fingerlings), the mortality rate would be 10%, increasing gradually until it reaches 30% for lower weights (e.g. less than 1 g).• Assuming that the mortality rate is 10%, the number of fingerlings to be cultured would be as follows: Number of harvested fish + number of expected loss (number of harvested fish x loss percentage). For example, if 20 fish are harvested, the farmer must culture 22 fingerlings per cubic meter: 20 + (20 x 0.1) = 22 fingerlings/m 3 ).It is worth mentioning here that a fish tank has a maximum carrying capacity for production. This depends on several factors, such as water quality, feeding rate, availability of aeration devices, duration of its operating hours and management. For example, if customers prefer small fish, farmers who want to produce 250 g fish will have to double the number of fingerlings (22 fingerlings/m 3 → 44 fingerlings/m 3 ). Production will remain at 10 kg/m 3 , but the size of the fish produced in the same period might have to be halved (500 g/fish → 250 g/fish).Farmers must also take into account the relationship between field irrigation requirements and the intensity of fish farming. The higher the rate of water changes in the pond, the greater the chances of intensifying the production (an expert in fish farming ought to be consulted).7. Fish culture 8. Fish nutrition• Feed is important for fish growth, especially in intensive fish farming, as it is the main source of nutrition. It is a source of ammonia, either directly, through the decomposition of feed in water, or indirectly, through waste from fish feeding and organic matter. In both cases, ammonia enriches the water and supplies it with important elements, especially nitrogen, that are needed for plants to grow. However, farmers must make sure not to use too much feed so that the level of ammonia does not get too high and that feed is not wasted. To dispose of this excess ammonia, farmers either have to replace some of the water to prevent a decline in water quality or use it for agricultural crops, which can benefit from this excess nitrogen.• Feed is the largest part of production costs, so farmers should buy good quality feed produced specifically for the fish they are culturing.• Deal directly with the factory, not a mediator, to avoid fraud or bad storage. Otherwise, only deal with a trusted mediator.• When purchasing feed, makes sure the ingredients and production date are shown on the data card and list the levels of protein, energy, calcium, phosphorous and vitamins.• Analyze a sample of the feed, if possible, to ensure its quality, and contact the factory if necessary. How the sample is taken is an important to determine the feed quality. As such, several conditions must be observed when taking a sample: (i) the sample should represent the entire feed stock, (ii) prepare the sample according to the analyses needed and (iii) preserve the sample to last long enough to complete all required analyses.• Store various feeds separately in a suitable, well-ventilated warehouse that keeps out pests and rodents.• Keep records of feed purchases, including the type, source, price and quantity.• Floating feed is recommended because it minimizes feed loss and is simple to determine when to stop feeding, as it is easy to see when the fish stop eating.• For small fish, feed them 1-2 mm pellets that are 30%-35% protein, and give it to them three to four times daily at a rate of 5%-10% of their weight. For large fish, they require 3 mm pellets that are 25%-30% protein, given one or two times daily at a rate of 2%-5% of their weight.• When throwing floating feed to fish, use a \"floating\" ring made of hoses or pipes to trap the feed inside it to stop the feed from drifting to the sides of the pond. This will make it easy for fish to reach the food and avoid being preyed upon by birds, as they won't have to approach shallow areas near the pond's sides.• Follow the proper feeding method for the type and size of fish cultured. Artificial fish feed is available in different granule forms and pellet diameters (Table 3). The size of the pellets depends on the size of the mouths of the fish.• Chose the proper granule size. As the sizes of fish often vary in a single pond, it is necessary to mix two or more pellet sizes to cover the nutritional needs of every size. To avoid large fish from eating the feed for smaller fish, place the small granules in a special feeder that only small fish can access.Larvae to 10 days old >0.5 10-30 days 0.5-1 1-30 g 1 20-120 g 2 100-250 g 3 250 g 4Table 3. The relationship between the weight/age of tilapia and the diameter of feed pellets used for feeding.• To minimize feed waste, use a demand feeder (Plate 5), which releases feed only when the fish are under it looking for food. Fiberglass feeders are best because they last longer than those made of sheet steel, which rusts quickly because of the humidity associated with fishponds.Feed fish until they appear satiated. The best way to determine this is to use floating feeds, as the farmer can see how the fish are feeding. If the fish eat all of the feed within 20-30 minutes, they do not need any more food. However, if there is still feed left over after 30 minutes, reduce the equivalent amount of feed that remains uneaten. If the fish eat all of the feed in less than 10 minutes, increase the amount of feed 10% per day until the fish appear satiated after 20-30 minutes.Taking fish samples regularly is necessary to know how the fish are doing, their growth rate and the quality of the feed used and to determine how much feed is needed per day.Taking samples regularly is important to• monitor the growth of fish in each tank;• calculate the amount of feed needed according to weight gain;• evaluate the quality of the feed by calculating the increased weight of the fish as a result of using a certain amount of feed (feed conversion ratio);• estimate the expected amount of fish production;• plan the harvest date according to the sample size and growth rate;• taste the fish before the harvest to judge the quality before selling them;• determine the health of the fish according to the relationship between their weight and length.Follow these steps to obtain a fish sample from a specific pond:• When taking the sample, avoid times of high temperatures and extreme cold, as well as fog and strong winds.• Take the sample while feeding the fish, as this is the best time to collect the fish.• Make sure the number of fish in the sample is sufficient and comes from different areas of the tank.• Place the fish gently into small containers, such as buckets.• Weigh the fish in small quantities to avoid crowding and fatigue.• Record the data from the samples and feed quantities used for each tank.• When taking samples to screen for diseases, do not return the fish to the pond.Be sure not to stress the fish in order to maintain their liveliness and to avoid infections. Avoid sampling fish (i) when there are problems with the water quality in the pond, (ii) if the fish are diseased, (iii) when the pond water is too turbid, and (iv) when it is raining.Photo credit: WorldFish Plate 5. Feeding fish manually.• Identify the specifications of the water used in the farm, its quantities and suitability for fish culture and production and crop irrigation practices.• Fish do not consume the water but only maximize its use.• Analyze the source of the farm water, including salinity, DO, pH, ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, phosphorous, iron, potassium and, most importantly, pollutants.• Monitor the pond's water quality parameters to determine the appropriate management method and whether to replace or aerate the water. This is also essential to determine the impact on crops.• Make sure the water depth is optimal for fish growth.• Use groundwater to keep the temperature stable and lengthen the growth period of the fish.• As much as possible, reuse the water after it is filtered to conserve resources. This requires using mechanical and biological filters as well as aeration devices, depending on intensity levels.There are two types of water sources: groundwater and surface water.Surface water, such as rivers, lakes and streams, is affected by temperatures changes, depending on the weather conditions. When temperatures drop in winter, farmers have to stop feeding their fish.They also need to replace the water frequently in order to keep the temperature of the pond from dropping too low.Examples of groundwater include well and spring water. Unlike surface water, groundwater maintains a constant temperature throughout the year, so farmers do not need to stop feeding their fish during the winter. Groundwater also reduces the fatigue of fish caused by temperature changes. If using spring water, however, farmers must make sure to measure levels of DO, salinity and iron.As shown in Table 4, groundwater is one of the best types of water for fish farming. It contains low levels of pathogens and pollutants, so its microbial content is low. However, groundwater lacks DO, so farmers will need to use devices to increase its oxygen content.The size of the water tank must be twice the amount of water needed for the fish. This is to maintain a sustainable volume of water for the fish.The temperature remains steady throughout the year. The temperature varies according to weather conditions.Dissolved oxygen DO is low, so ventilation is required. DO levels are sufficient.It is free of unwanted fish or any other organisms.A mesh net should be placed over the irrigation source to stop unwanted fish from entering.The temperature does not change, so greenhouses can be used to maintain the temperature.The temperature needs to change, if shelter or heating is not available.Water analysis is necessary to ensure the water is suitable and free from toxic elements or metals.Water analysis is preferred, but the risk of toxic elements or metals is low.Table 4. Comparison between groundwater and surface water.The following factors determine the rates for replacing water in a fish production unit:• fish density (biomass)• water requirements for crops during irrigation periods• amount of feed added to the tank • DO levels in the water• availability or absence of aeration devices• amount of organic waste and solid sediment in the tank• water temperature• vitality of fish and fish diseases• algal bloom.• Aeration increases the percentage of DO in the water. It is the most important factor for maintaining the vitality of the fish and improving their appetite.• Using aeration equipment (Plate 6) in ponds helps direct waste to the drain. If the devices are placed properly, they can help discharge the waste out of the pond.• Consult a specialist to determine whether the pond needs aerators or paddlewheels to meet its oxygen requirements and to know when and how long to use them.• The higher the density of fish and biomass in the pond, the more aeration is needed.Intensive culture ponds require permanent aeration.• In high-density culture units, measure the ratio of DO daily and use the aeration system regularly whenever the ratio falls below its optimal rate. This will keep the fish from suffocating and maintain their growth rate.• For tilapia, the percentage of DO in the water should be no less than 5 mg/L. Since the ratio of DO in the water decreases sharply during the night and reaches its lowest level before sunrise, farmers must aerate their ponds overnight.Plate 6. Paddle wheel aerator.Photo credit: WorldFishPreventive measures include several stages.• Get rid of floating plants and fish waste, such as dead fish.• In case of previous diseases, disinfect the fish using quicklime, formalin or chlorine.• Be sure to purchase fry from a reputable source. Make sure the fry are of high vitality, uniform in size and free from apparent pathological symptoms.• Use feed that is suitable for the age of the fry. Powdered is best.• Follow proper preventive measures when receiving the fry, especially if they are brought from different regions. As an example, place the fry in a small separate pond and leave them for several days without feeding. If they show any pathological symptoms, they are infected. If not, transfer them to the grow-out ponds.• Place screens over the water inlet and drainage pipes to keep undesirable fish out of the pond. This will also help control birds, which can carry diseases.• Pay attention to water quality parameters. For example, monitor the DO and temperature daily. Other parameters, such as ammonia and nitrite, can be monitored weekly.• Give the fish high quality feed that meets their nutritional requirements.• Store feed properly. Avoid storing it for a long time to prevent damage and avoid the growth of fungus.• Do periodic sampling to keep tabs on the health of the fish.• Follow proper hygiene measures when getting rid of dead fish in the farm. Use an isolated area to dispose of dead fish safely, whether by burning or burial. If burying fish, do so at an appropriate depth and spray with quicklime afterward (Figure 5).Generally, it is highly recommended to observe the behavior of the fish in the pond at all stages and consult with a fish disease specialist as soon as there is a change in behavior or appearance of mortality. 11. Fish harvesting and post-harvest proceduresFor integrated aquaculture-agricultural systems, partial harvesting is best because this keeps the water in the pond in order to irrigate the crops.As such, it is important to use nets when doing a partial harvest so as not to drain the water completely. If a full harvest has to be done, make sure that the canal or irrigation system can absorb the amount of water to be drained. In addition, before every harvest, farmers must be aware of the current market trends and expected selling prices to determine how many fish to harvest.Follow these procedures when harvesting fish:• Stop feeding the fish at least 1 day before the harvest so that they can empty their digestive tract.• Before draining the pond, close the irrigation inlet and install nets over the drainage pipe.• Eliminate aquatic plants and solid plankton growing on the bottom of the pond, as this can hinder the movement of the nets.• Taste test the fish before the harvest to make sure that the fish taste good and do not have unwanted odors.• Train workers on how to catch, sort and handle fish properly.• Drain the pond quickly, and pump the water into the drain age canal, not at the source of irrigation.• When harvesting, avoid exposing the fish to high heat or extreme cold in the pond.• In the summer, harvest the fish before sunrise or at sunset to avoid high temperatures when handling and transporting the fish.• Transport the fish to the washing and sorting station as quickly as possible.• Clean all tools and containers used to handle and sort the fish.• Wash the fish thoroughly with clean water to maintain quality.• Use crushed ice to keep the fish cool while washing them.• During sorting, grade the fish in accordance with marketing sizes.After grading, place the fish in the appropriate marketing packages according to consumer preferences. Use packages of good quality and healthy specifications.When packaging fish for sale, follow these measures:• Lay the fish lengthwise, and stack them without bending the body.• Do not put too many fish into the box. Boxes should be no more than 30 cm high.• Make sure the fish do not touch the sides of the box. Instead, place ice on the sides.• Stack the fish in layers alternately with layers of crushed ice to avoid damage.If selling live fish, weigh them and then place them in clean oxygenated water tanks fitted with an oxygen cylinder or air pump. If the fish are to be sold at an open market, use crushed ice to maintain the firmness and freshness of the fish.Have sufficient quantities of crushed ice on hand to compensate for ambient temperatures and the distance of transportation.Cover the fish boxes with clean linoleum during transportation to avoid exposure to direct sunlight and to keep the ice from melting quickly. Transport the fish during the night or in the early morning, and do so in a refrigerated vehicle. It is always best to transport the fish as soon as possible to the market.If using ice to transport the fish and maintain freshness, keep in mind that the amount of ice used must be proportional to the amount of fish being transported, as well as the ambient temperature. This should be done immediately after harvest. The faster the fish are cooled, the longer they stay fresh.An alternative way to treat fish after harvest is to submerge them in cold water (0°C-4°C) immediately after harvesting. This will induce heat shock and keep the fish fresh before they are sold.Farmers who use this method can transport the fish to the market in a refrigerated vehicle without having to add ice.Plate 7. Partial harvest activities in integrated tanks.Photo credit: Ahmed Nasr-Allah/WorldFish• Take into account pre-and post-harvest procedures, and follow proper methods to ensure the fish stay firm and fresh until they reach the markets.• Communicate with marketing associations and other producers to save time and energy and potentially reduce costs.• Maintain good relations with producer associations, various fish market administrative groups and fish marketing groups. Fish producer associations are particularly helpful because they study the needs of the market and can help market products in different places inside and outside the country.• Be aware of the different markets, price changes and seasonality.• Time harvests to take advantage of increased market demand in some seasons to achieve the highest return.• For partial harvests, determine the quantity to harvest according to the needs of local markets. Focus on selling live fish to maximize returns and reduce costs.• Harvest fish that are the size that target markets prefer.• To maintain quality, keep fish as fresh as possible, bearing in mind that consumers have different taste preferences.Plate 8. Stacking fish carefully without bending the body to avoid damage.Photo credit: Ahmed Nasr-Allah/WorldFishFarmers should follow these recommendations to support permanent laborers on the farm and for the community around it:• Give fish to people far away from traditional fish production areas at affordable prices and in good condition.• Allocate part of the farm's production for sale to the residents of the surrounding area at a wholesale price.• Show the benefits of integration between the fish and crops to the local community.• Encourage the employment of youths and women.• Do not employ children.• For irrigation, use water that contains high levels of fertilizer elements. This will reduce the need for agriculture fertilizer for crops and reduce the impact on the environment.• Contribute to the social and health care of the farm workers and their families.• Donate to charities and community development projects in the areas around the farm.• When promoting products, be sure to mention that there are employment opportunities available on the farm.• Employ residents from some of the areas around the farm.• Encourage consumers to eat locally produced fish to help reduce the consumption of imported fish of unknown origin. In addition, explain the differences between fresh and frozen fish.• Share media promotions for fish farms that explain their safety and security to consumers and the safety of the procedures used in their production.• Cooperate with neighboring farms to keep facilities, water canals and drainages intact and in good condition and help maintain them.• Provide adequate facilities for the subsistence of farm workers.• Ensure that workers are provided with the necessary supplies, such as protective gear and clothing.• Train workers on how to use chemicals and medicines safely.• Organize fairs and events to showcase day-to-day fish culture and crop culture system work activities, where participants could have access to the farm's records to get a sense of the day-to-day management. This could include information on daily water quality parameters, fish behavior, amount of water used for irrigation, incident reports, waste management, etc.• Train the workers responsible for feeding fish to identify water quality warning signals and take appropriate measures.• Train workers on biosecurity measures."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2100418909.json b/main/part_2/2100418909.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0771683c86d834e0fe10d85f7e7924c1de11d69d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2100418909.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f09b4e55a13e26869ba0f9444e0c2590","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/IWMI_Research_Reports/PDF/pub054/Report54.pdf","id":"-299684143"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"96d728e4-a5cc-48c3-8504-200c5d1d8a75","content":"In serving this mission, IWMI concentrates on the integration of policies, technologies and management systems to achieve workable solutions to real problems-practical, relevant results in the field of irrigation and water and land resources.The publications in this series cover a wide range of subjects-from computer modeling to experience with water user associations-and vary in content from directly applicable research to more basic studies, on which applied work ultimately depends. Some research reports are narrowly focused, analytical and detailed empirical studies; others are wide-ranging and synthetic overviews of generic problems.Although most of the reports are published by IWMI staff and their collaborators, we welcome contributions from others. Each report is reviewed internally by IWMI's own staff and Fellows, and by external reviewers. The reports are published and distributed both in hard copy and electronically (www.iwmi.org) and where possible all data and analyses will be available as separate downloadable files. Reports may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgment. i ifor attacking eastern India's rural poverty through fuller utilization of its groundwater resources. First, eastern India needs to scrap its existing minor irrigation programs run by government bureaucracies, which gobble up funds but deliver little irrigation. Second, while the electricity-supply environment is in total disarray, innovative ideassuch as decentralized retailing and metering of power and prepaid electricity cards-need to be piloted as part of a broader initiative to improve the quality of power supply to agriculture. Third, programs are needed to improve the unacceptably low energy-efficiency of electric as well as diesel pumps. Fourth, there is a need to promote diesel pumps under 5-hp and improved manual irrigation technologies such as treadle pumps. Finally, above all else, east Indian States need to reform their pump subsidy schemes à la Uttar Pradesh (UP) so as to ameliorate the scarcity of pump capital that lies at the heart of the problem.viIndia by Bhalla and Singh (1997) shows that during 1963-93, the productivity per male agricultural worker crossed the Rs 10,000 barrier in much of India;2 but most of eastern India was not a part of it. The only region of eastern India that seems to be crossing the barrier is eastern UP (figure 1).Eastern UP, the western-most part of eastern India and the GMB basin, is an interesting study because it has just managed to break out of its agrarian stagnation. It is also interesting because its transformation over the past 15 years has been energized largely by the rapid-and much needed-development of small-scale groundwater irrigation; and offers critical lessons about how the rest of the basin can trigger off its belated Green Revolution. The present analysis of eastern India-with particular focus on eastern UP-is essentially a study in political economy and practical policy. It is about how major public policy initiatives have actually impeded groundwater development rather than accelerating it; and how spontaneous market responses of a multitude of private economic agents produced the social welfare that public programs failed to produce. The overarching lesson is that the seeds of an effective strategy for groundwater-ledBackdrop 1 These estimates seem plausible; eastern India's area of 348,000 square km is 10.6% of India's total area but its 260 million people are over a fourth of the Indian population. Add to this Bangladesh's 280 million, and we already have over 500 million.In 1993, US$1.00=Indian Rs 33.63.Eastern India, especially the 15 eastern districts of UP and the entire States of Bihar, West Bengal and parts of Orissa constitute a significant chunk of the Ganga-Meghna-Brahmaputra (GMB) basin that encompasses, in addition, all of Bangladesh and the terai areas of Nepal. The problem this report deals with and the strategy outlined to respond to it are analyzed in the east India context; but the analysis applies with equal force to the terai areas of Nepal as also to much of Bangladesh. The GMB basin has fertile lands, but very high population pressure (at over 830 for Bangladesh and over 600 for eastern India in 1991 compared to 285 for India as a whole) and, according to some estimates, the basin is home to 500 million people, many of whom are among the world's poorest. 1 The region is marked by high dependence of its predominantly rural population on smallholder agriculture and wage labor. In 1991, in Bihar and eastern UP, the proportion of the population dependent on agriculture was 79% compared to 66.7% for India as a whole. While western UP, Haryana and the two Punjabs (Indian and Pakistan) underwent massive agrarian transformation during the 1960s, agrarian growth in the eastern areas of India remained stagnant.A district-wise analysis of agricultural growth in The Ganga basin.agricultural development for all of eastern India-and the GMB basin-are embedded in the lessons offered by the experience of eastern UP. In the second to the fifth sections our focus then is on learning lessons from eastern UP. In 3 The State's annual average precipitation is 33 million ha-m; after making allowances for evaporation losses, the share of other States, requirements of industry, commercial and domestic users and others, it has a surface irrigation resource potential of 14-15 million ha-m and the total groundwater resources are estimated at 8.5 million ha-m, all of which is nearly one-fifth of the all-India potential estimated at 43.18 million ha-m (GOI 1996:9). After allowing 15% of the gross recharge for nonagricultural uses, the net recharge available for irrigation is 7.74 million ha-m. Because of its inefficiency, surface water is estimated to be capable of irrigating 13.7 million ha (with a delta of well over 1 meter). In contrast, UP's groundwater resources can irrigate around 20.3 million ha (with a delta of 0.38 m), taking the ultimate irrigation potential of the State to 34 million ha.the last two sections, we explore their implications for eastern India as a whole and evolve a five-point strategy to stimulate groundwater irrigation for livelihood creation in the Ganga basin.There are abundant surface water and groundwater resources in eastern and northeastern India. Figure 2, based on estimates, which have recently been revised upward, prepared by India's Central Groundwater Board, suggests that of the total usable recharge of 325 km 3 for India as a whole, 25%, or over 80 km 3 are available to eastern and northeastern India. These values exclude 16 districts of eastern UP. If these were included, eastern India's groundwater resources would increase further to 92 km 3 . Less than one-fourth of this resource is in use at present. The groundwater resources of UP are abundant; its surface irrigation potential is estimated at some 13-14 million ha; but groundwater irrigation potential is estimated at over 20 million ha, taking the total irrigation potential to 33-34 million ha.3, 4 All of UP falls in the piedmont zone of the Himalayas skirted FIGURE 2.Regional distribution of India's usable groundwater recharge of 325 km2.by an artesian belt under free-flowing conditions extending from Jammu and Kashmir in the west to Tripura in the east. \"The hydrological environment and groundwater regime conditions in the Indo-Ganga-Brahmaputra basin indicate the existence of an enormous fresh groundwater reservoir at least down to 600 m or more below land surface. Bestowed with high incidence of rainfall, this groundwater reservoir gets replenished every year, the average annual recharge throughout the GMB basin ranging from 50 to 75 cm. Apart from the vertical recharge, substantial recharge occurs through horizontal absorption of water through the Bhabhar zone, a 10-20 km wide strip of highly pervious formation in the Himalayan foothills through which all Himalayan rivers must pass.The alluvial aquifers to the explored depth of FIGURE 3.Regional distribution of India's 599 'dark' blocks with over 85% groundwater development.600 m have transmissivity values from 250 to 4,000 m 2 /d and hydraulic conductivity from 10 to 800 m/d. Well yields range up to 100 lps and more but yields of 40-100 lps are common...\" (GOI 1996:3). Overall, then, while peninsular India is searching for effective ways to control groundwater overexploitation, the need of eastern UP, as indeed of the rest of eastern India, is to step up the utilization of abundant groundwater resources for wealth creation and poverty alleviation. Of India's 7,063 blocks, 5 599 are dark. 6 Figure 3 shows that only 1% of these are in eastern and northeastern India. Similarly, figure 4 sets out the distribution of white, gray and dark blocks in different subregions of UP.For UP as a whole, less than 2.5% of the blocks are designated dark; and nearly 80% are denoted as white, offering much scope for 5A \"block\" consists roughly of 100 villages; and it is a basic geographic unit between a village and a district.tapping unutilized irrigation potential. Eastern UP offers even greater promise: 289 of its 345 blocks (84%) are white; 50 (14%) are gray and just 6 (2%) are designated dark. The problem of overdevelopment is more acute in Western UP where groundwater irrigation has developed faster than in other parts of UP over the past two decades. If anything, this already abundant groundwater recharge of eastern UP is only further augmented by newly developed canal irrigation. A good deal-in fact, nearly onefourth-of UP's groundwater recharge is contributed by canal irrigation, according to the estimates by the State Groundwater Department (GoUP 1996b); however, this proportion is probably even higher, for water losses through seepage are estimated to be 75% in many systems with unlined canal distributary networks. In this flood-prone region, floodwaters Uttar Pradesh: Distribution of blocks (%) according to level of groundwater utilization in relation to available net recharge. too contribute to recharge as do the shallow water tables to which recharge gets added.All in all, the available irrigation potential, estimated using liberal norms for water requirements of crops, is 1.33 times the State's 1991 gross cropped area of 25.5 million ha, offering ample scope for raising the State's overall average cropping intensity from the present 148% to 200%, or even more, since the bulk of the unutilized potential is in groundwater. Already, 6 out of the 13.7 million ha potential of surface irrigation are utilized; but only 6 million ha of the 20.3 million ha (gross) of available groundwater potential are used, leaving room to bring over 14 million ha more under groundwater irrigation. The potential for further groundwater development is even greater further eastward, as in north Bihar and north Bengal where the available recharge is as great as or greater than-but whose utilization is far lower than-in eastern UP.technology, more crops under irrigated conditions, cropping pattern diversification in favor of high-value crops and a large summer crop which is by and large nonexistent.Northern India's Green Revolution has generally been credited to early public investments made in canal irrigation in that region. However, it has also been argued that the rise of the Green Revolution in Punjab, Haryana and western UP was fueled more by the private tube-well revolution; and that its refusal to progress eastward from Lucknow, which divides western from eastern India in the north, is explained by the slow pace of groundwater development in the east (Dhawan 1982). Several reasons explain this: a) many studies-including macro-level-have shown unmistakable evidence that fertilizer use is directly and significantly related to tube-well irrigation (see, e.g., GOI 1985); b) numerous There are compelling reasons for stimulating rapid and fuller development of groundwater resources in eastern India: first, it can be an important part of a strategy for correcting the regional imbalance in the development of the east versus the west; second, it can be a direct response to the region's rural poverty; third, undeveloped, the region's high premonsoonal groundwater table accentuates its condition of flood-proneness and waterlogging.Eastern India constitutes the bulk of India's \"poverty square.\" It is largely rural, predominantly agricultural, and has a high population density. As a microcosm of eastern India, this east-west development dichotomy is apparent in UP, too. While western UP forged ahead with the Green Revolution in the 1960s and 70s, eastern UP lagged behind in most respects (table 1). The region needs a strong push in its agriculture sector to promote wider spread of the High-Yielding Variety (HYV) seed East and West: Regional disparities in agrarian performance in UP, India.micro-level studies based on sample surveys show that pump-irrigated farms perform much better compared to those irrigated by any other source in terms of cropping intensity, input use and yields 7 (see, e.g., Dhawan 1985); and c) by common observation, this difference between areas irrigated by private tube wells and those irrigated by gravity flow canals is obviously explained by the superior quality-in terms of reliability, timeliness, adequacy-of irrigation that tube wells offer compared to other sources (Chambers et al. 1987;Shah 1993). As far back as 1985, a study group constituted by India's Planning Commission to explore agricultural strategies in eastern India noted that \"one major reason for the low yield levels of eastern region States compared to the rest of India, particularly the chief rice-growing States viz., Andhra Pradesh and Tamilnadu, is the much lower level of irrigation in the former. About three-fourths of the rice area in the eastern region is still cultivated under the uncertain monsoonal conditions affected by floods as well as draughts\" (GOI 1985:1). Finally, increased density of wells can increase the welfare of the people in the eastern region through the powerful positive externality they produce by acting as an antidote to waterlogging and flood-proneness. Much of eastern India, particularly eastern UP, north Bihar, Kuchbehar and Jalpaiguri districts in north Bengal and parts of Orissa are flood-prone. According to the estimates made by the UP Groundwater Department, 3.4 million ha-m of the total 8.42 million ha-m of groundwater recharge that UP gets annually occur from canal irrigation (1.24 million ha-m), surface irrigation reflows (0.69 million ha-m), recharge from tanks, lateral recharge from flood-prone areas and from shallow water-table areas (GoUP 1996b). This surfeit of groundwater recharge increases as one moves from west to east. In eastern UP, vast areas remain inundated by flood waters for the better part of the year, and acute waterlogging characterizes the Saryu-par areas in the middle of the Ganga basin-bordered in the south by the Ghaghra river and spread over Gorakhpur, Maharajganj, Deoria, Siddharthnagar, Basti, Gonda and Bahraich districts. The entire area, which encompasses nearly a tenth of UP, has an acute problem of subsoil water drainage and, consequently, a uniformly high groundwater table at 3-5 meters. Ghaghra, Rapti, and Gandak are notorious flood-creating rivers but even smaller rivers like Rohini, Burhi Rapti, Ami, Kuwano, Gurra, Tons, Kunhra, Ghonghi, Burha Gandak, Chhota Gandak, Taraina too contribute their deluge in flooding the region (Wajih and Kumar nd). Rapti alone inundates 350,000 ha every year in Bahraich, Gonda, Basti, Siddharthnagar and Deoria (Yadav and Lal 1994;nd). Estimates made from remote sensing data of the area under flood inundation and surface waterlogging in eastern UP (within latitudes 26 0 0¢ and 30 0 0¢ N and longitudes 78 0 15¢ and 84 0 30¢ E)during September 2-6, 1988 showed that 1.089 million ha-including croplands-were 7Regression equations on survey data typically have low coefficients of determination and large values for the intercept-representing the weight of the omitted variables-indicating some specification problem. Production functions based on a survey of 380 farmers in Gorakhpur, Basti, Deoria, Siddharthnagar and Maharjganj districts of eastern UP conducted by Shah et al. (1997) showed the following results:. Paddy: q p = 4.840 . F p where, subscripts p and w refer to kharif (rainy season) paddy and rabi (dry season) wheat, q refers to output/acre (kg); F refers to fertilizer use/ acre (kg), L is hired labor/acre (person-days) and H refers to hours of pump irrigation used per acre. R 2 is unacceptable and the intercept term unusually large; t-ratios and the elasticities, however, are significant. The coefficient for irrigation hours was large and highly significant for wheat, that for kharif paddy was small and insignificant, presumably because kharif paddy in eastern UP is predominantly rain-fed.\"completely/partially inundated\" and 0.678 million ha had surface waterlogging (Kolavalli et al. 1989: 81). Every year, floods hit over 15% of eastern UP's croplands; and over half of the region has groundwater tables of less than 5 m in the pre-monsoon period (ibid.). According to a study undertaken by the Gorakhpur Environmental Action Group, some 0.398 million ha-m of water are added to the groundwater table every year; of this, only 0.064 million ham (around 16%) are abstracted through various irrigation structures. Waterlogging and floodproneness are aggravated by the large-scale erection of embankments 8 in the Gorakhpur and Deoria districts, which further impede drainage and accentuate waterlogging. 9Flood-proneness and waterlogging have hit the lives and livelihoods of people in a myriad ways. Between 1951 and 1981, the area cultivated in kharif in the Gandak River Project command fell from 214,000 ha to 68,000 ha due to annual flooding and surface waterlogging (Yadav and Lal nd). High flood-proneness induces risk aversion; as a result, in these areas, farmers clung to traditional mixed-crop farming technologies, which offered some insurance cover against flood risks and minimized cash costs of cultivation. The tradition of animal husbandry too has been undergoing change due to waterlogging; as grazing lands remain submerged in water for long periods, the population of large bovines has declined. Marginal farmers and landless have increasingly taken to piggery. Flooding and waterlogging have also brought in their wake a variety of health-related disadvantages; incidence of diseases like malaria, Japanese encephalitis and filaria is rampant. Moreover, due to flooding and waterlogging, soluble iodine is washed away or removed by seepage, causing severe iodine deficiency (Wajih and Kumar 1994). Over a third of the usar (sodic) lands of UP are largely an outcome of the rapidly rising water tables causing waterlogging conditions in extensive areas of the State. In saline lands, vegetation exists only in kharif and the pH is lower than 8.5; in salinealkaline lands, the most common variety of usar lands, the presence of a kankar pan (layer of limestone and clay) causes water stagnation.Much has been made of the need to \"augment\" lean season flows in Ganga; indeed, insufficiency of Ganga waters to meet the summer needs has been a major bone of contention in India-Bangladesh discussions on the sharing of Ganga waters. But as many observers have suggested, such augmentation is outside the realm of feasibility; and the best approach to achieving seasonal water balance is better and more integrated management of the basin as a whole (see, e.g., Ramaswamy 1999:2,296). The centerpiece of such a strategy has to be increased subsurface retention and storage of peak-flows for use in the lean seasons; and the most practical and costeffective way of doing this is through rapid groundwater development.A major reason for eastern India's waterlogging and flood-proneness is insufficient conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water. Just as excessive groundwater draft results in drying of springs and reduced baseflow in rivers, too little of it adds to the swelling of rivers and streams at peak-flows in the form of \"rejected recharge.\" Ideally, groundwater development should match canal irrigation, especially in ill-drained soils as encountered in much of eastern India; but as figure 5 shows, in eastern UP districts, the development of both groundwater and surface water has lacked this balance. As far back as 1948, a commission appointed by the Government of UP asserted that the flood problems of eastern UP were \"due to reduction in the absorptive capacity of the soil\" (Yadav and Lal 1994). This \"reduction\" has been magnified with the development of intensive canal irrigation during the last five decades since then. Particularly after 1950, the laying out of new canal networks, most of them unlined, has resulted in a rapid and persistent rise in groundwater tables that, in turn, has resulted in large areas being waterlogged for 5-6 months after the last of the monsoonal rains. This problem, which has bewitched the entire eastern India, was further aggravated by the construction of countless embankments, first by the erstwhile Zamindaars, and more recently under government programs, which were intended to protect communities and farmlands from flash floods but have been producing exactly the opposite impact (Mishra 1999a;1999b). As in eastern UP, Bihar's flood-prone area too tripled from 2.5 million ha in 1954 to 6.8 million ha in 1994-which means that 70% of the population in north Bihar, some 30 million people, are at risk from floods every year (ibid.).Many strategies have been recommended and tried out to deal with the intensification of the flood-proneness and waterlogging in eastern UP as a consequence of the growth of canal irrigation. But there has been growing consensus that the most important long-term strategy to fight flood-proneness is the rapid increase in groundwater irrigation, which will not only lower water tables but also help reduce the intensity of floods and the average period of flooding by enhancing the underground storage for flood waters, canal seepage as well as irrigation reflows. Reviewing the suggestions The preponderance of marginal farmers and their lack of capacity to make tube-well investments have then been the central challenge in stimulating poverty-focused groundwater development in eastern India. And all government and NGO initiatives since 1950 have been designed to respond to this challenge. Early thinking was aimed at organizing the poor for collectively managing an irrigation asset or through an extensive and vigorous public tube-well (PTW) program. Eastern UP offers examples of both these institutional options, although there is only one significant case of tube wells owned and managed by farmer groups. This experiment was promoted in the Deoria district of UP and the Vaishali district in Bihar by a local NGO under the Indo-Norwegian Agricultural Development Project. Niranjan Pant who followed the rise and fall of the farmer-managed tube wells over a period spanning more than a decade, wrote in the early 1980s, \"the wells owned and operated by groups of small and marginal farmers were found to be doing a very satisfying job… the management of each tube well was the responsibility of the group of farmers and the group leader…[and they] were quite successful from the point of view of accessibility of groundwater among the resource-poor farmers\" (Pant 1984). But when he revisited the groups in Deoria in 1988, \"to our dismay, we found many of the groups which existed in 1983 had disintegrated...The main reason... [was that] the commands of the group of tube wells were subsumed under the World Bank tube wells...the World Bank tube-well water was available at a much cheaper rate...\" (Pant 1989: 97-98).A few years later, the PTW program, which had its own shortcomings and which cannibalized the Deoria tube-well groups, itself fell to the predatory onslaught of the booming local pump-irrigation markets. By 1990, there were nearly 30,000 large PTWs strewn all over UP's countryside, constructed with financial support from the Dutch and the World Bank. Its failings however soon began to come to the fore. In the mid-1980s, the PTW program was losing around Rs 650-700 million/yr. (Kolavalli and Shah 1989); in the 1990s, the annual losses exceeded Rs 1,000 million. A new program launched in the late 1970s with World Banksupport promoted several new design features such as dedicated power supply to a cluster of 25 PTWs linked to an independent 11 kV line, buried pipelines, automatic operation of wells, tamper-proof outlets, and the system of osrabandi (an arrangement for rotational water supply to irrigators) for water allocation overseen by an elected farmer committee and executed by a part-time operator chosen from the area itself.This, too, however, failed to arrest the downward spin in the performance of PTWs. They did better than conventional PTWs while they were new. However, as they advanced in age, the performance of the World Bank tube wells declined too. For instance, the average number of hours and area irrigated per tube well fell from 2,304 hours and 77 ha in 1976-77 to 780 hours and 35 ha in 1983-84 (ibid.); the downward spin continued thereafter. A study of the \"new design\" PTWs in Faizabad, Basti and Deoria districts by Pant concluded that only a third of the farmers in the command could depend upon the PTWs exclusively for their irrigation needs; 60% of the PTWs had nonfunctioning meters; 30% of PTWs did not have farmer committees and in the rest, the committees had seldom met; the performance of tube wells themselves was quite poor compared to what was planned; the highest realizable revenue by PTWs was less than needed to meet the operator's salary (Pant 1989).Different researchers have found marginally different clusters of reasons explaining the failure of the UP PTW program. Kolavalli and Shah (1989) blamed insufficient and erratic power supply, inadequate conveyance systems, operator-absenteeism, failure of the osrabandi system and poor maintenance as the main reasons. In addition to all these, Pant (1989) also found the organization-design failure to be an important factor: \"[operators] thought they were accountable to irrigation officials rather than to command farmers or to the Tube-Well Management Committee. Consequently, the distribution was done more or less in an arbitrary manner. The core component of water distribution system such as osrabandi, opening of one outlet at a time in a loop and beneficiary involvement were conspicuous by their absence.\" (Pant 1989:100). Palmer-Jones (1995: iv) concluded that, quite apart from the complex institutional issues, \"DTWs were and are an inappropriate technology for the social and economic conditions encountered in developing countries of South Asia…\" An important insight of Pant's study was that the PTWs stimulated the emergence of an active pump irrigation market in their commands, which made the PTWs themselves increasingly redundant! Contrary to a priori supposition, the number of private tube wells increased rapidly once an area got covered by a World Bank PTW command, in Faizabad, by 54% and in Deoria, by 33%. Over two-thirds of the PTW command farmers used other private tube-well irrigation; and of these, only a quarter owned tube wells, the rest purchased irrigation from private tube-well owners (TWOs) (Pant 1989:90). When the first generation PTWs came up in UP in the 1940s and 50s, private tube-well development was all but nonexistent. In fact, even in the 1970s, when the community tubewell experiment was carried out, eastern UP had very little private tube-well development. During the 1980s, however, the growth of private tube wells was truly rapid; and in their wake came the practice of water selling. Indeed, both the community tube wells and PTWs faced growing farmer apathy and disinterest because private water sellers rapidly made deep inroads into their command, established themselves as market leaders and reduced PTWs to the status of suppliers of supplemental irrigation. Pump-Irrigation Markets: 1960-90 Studies in the 1980s and 90s (Kolavalli et al. 1989;Kolavalli et al. 1992;Lall and Pachauri 1994;Pant 1992;Pant 1989;Shankar nd;Shankar 1992;Shah 1993;Shah et al. 1997), however, showed that a fitting response to this important equity issue came not from PTW programs but from private water markets.As far back as the 1960s, purchased pump irrigation from PTW owners was an important way for the resource-poor farmers to gain access to groundwater irrigation. However, the power and reach of this new institution were beginning to get recognized only during the late 1980s as the South Asian water market debate opened up. Most of these researchers found that compared to the lackadaisical PTW operators, private pump owners were surprisingly eager providers of irrigation services, taking on their competition by lowering the price and improving the quality of service. Much emerging evidence seems to suggest that although pump irrigation markets appeared to have wrecked public and collective irrigation institutions that focused upon securing irrigation FIGURE 6.Scale bias in tube-well ownership: Survey of 380 farmers in eastern UP (Shah et al. 1997).Even without its failings, the PTW program would not have played more than a marginal role in UP's Green Revolution. At full strength of 30,000 tube wells all working to their full capacity, the program would have developed no more than 1% of UP's groundwater potential. And a program much bigger than this would prove unmanageable in the best of conditions. Growing private investment in tube-well irrigation was thus a godsend for UP agriculture. One reason why interest in PTWs and community tube wells persisted long after they were proved unsustainable was the question of equity in access to groundwater appropriation and use by the resource-poor farmers who could not mobilize the chunky capital investment needed in tube-well installation. By the turn of the 1980s, a distinct pecking order had emerged in the organization of eastern India's groundwater economy: TWOs were typically medium-sized farmers while marginal farmers depended heavily on purchased pump irrigation and on manual lift irrigation by devices like treadle pumps. Figure 6, which reports on a 1997 survey of some 300 farmers in eastern UP, suggests this pecking order (see, Shah et al. 1997).access for the poor, ironically, it was the poor water buyers who disowned PTWs and community tube wells to turn to private water markets because of their superior and more reliable-even if apparently costlier-irrigation service.Late in the 1980s, Niranjan Pant reanalyzed his 1981 survey of 280 farmers in Deoria, Barabanki and Meerut districts and concluded that whereas only 27.7% of the farmers owned bore wells and 63.3% purchased irrigation water from pump owners. He found water trade deeper and broader in Barabanki or Meerut further west than in Deoria in the eastern parts probably because the latter had a lower pump density: \"In Deoria, an average tube well served 7.1 clients; in Barabanki and Meerut, it served 2.3 and 2.6 clients, respectively. On average, 27.1 acres (of owner's and his clients' lands) were irrigated by a private tube well in Deoria compared to 16.1 acres in Meerut and 6.9 acres in Barabanki\" (Pant 1989: 89).In 1988, Pant explored water markets in the course of extensive fieldwork throughout the eastern region and wrote: \"A common feature found in all eastern region States was sale and purchase of water on an hourly basis. The rates varied...and ranged between Rs 8 and 25/hour from a 5-hp pump/ tube well…\" [Pant 1991: 276]. Further, exploring the comparative reach amongst the poor of water markets, World Bank tube wells and canal irrigation in Faizabad and Bahraich, amongst India's poorest districts, 10 Pant concluded that \"The operation of the private groundwater markets appears to be very beneficial for farmers [in <0.4 ha and 0.4< II<1.0 ha categories]\" (see table 2).11 In contrast, Pant found that both World Bank PTWs and the canal system benefited primarily the well-off. \"...the World Bank-assisted tube wells in Faizabad at least cater to the needs of the poor to some extent, while in Bahraich, such tube wells cater to the needs of the relatively well-off…\" And then \"...canal as a public source of irrigation is worse than public tube wells and among the two districts, it is much worse in Faizabad...\" For the poorest farmers in eastern India, then, the benefits of groundwater irrigation have come through three routes: in large part, through purchased pump irrigation and, in a small way, through improved manual irrigation technologies as well as through the Free Boring Scheme (FBS). In manual technologies, the most notable has been the introduction of the treadle pump, which is particularly suited to farmers with less than a hectare of land because it requires an investment of less than Rs 700, and can deliver up to 1 l/s without any cash cost of operation. The treadle pump has been gaining in popularity; however, it faces tough competition from private pump irrigation sellers. In fact, a 1996 survey (Shah et al. 1997) to assess the impact of treadle pumps in eastern UP showed that treadle pump owners invariably used purchased pump irrigation as well. More importantly, it was impossible for Shah et al. (1997) to find pure rain-fed farmers in eastern UP; almost every farmer who does not have own means of irrigation buys irrigation service from private TWOs. Figure 7, based on a survey of 134 TWOs, 151 farmers wholly dependent on purchased pump irrigation and 95 treadle-pump owners, shows that, thanks to the pump-irrigation markets, not having one's own tube well is not all that much of a disadvantage because over 95% of the operated area in the case of all the three categories is irrigated. Another interesting finding of this survey was the surprisingly small contribution of surface water to smallholder irrigation. Considering that the sample of 280 was chosen from 25 villages in the Deoria and Maharajganj districts, which have a large canal network, Shah et al. (1997) had expected that canal irrigation would be an important presence for the farmers surveyed. Yet, it emerged that, after own tube wells, purchased pump irrigation service was the largest provider of smallholder irrigation; of the 1,000 odd acres operated by the 380 sample farmers, 35% was served by the water market (figure 8).The downside of water markets is the high cost of irrigation to the buyers, and the pressure on them to economize on groundwater use, especially in a region like eastern India, where as we reviewed earlier, groundwater withdrawal creates a powerful positive externality. Many studies indicate that whereas water markets have a wide reach, water buyers invariably use less water (in terms of hours pumped) compared to TWOs themselves. Figure 9, for example, shows the relative frugality of water use by water buyers in the five districts of eastern UP from which Shah et al. (1997) drew their sample of 380 Percent of operated area irrigated: Eastern UP sample survey of 380 farmers (Shah et al. 1997). Contribution of water markets in eastern UP agriculture: Survey of 380 farmers (Shah et al. 1997). Water use/acre by TWOs and water buyers in eastern UP: Results from a survey of 380 farmers (Shah et al. 1997).farmers. Other studies amply confirm this finding. Based on his survey of 50 farmers in Faizabad and 70 in Bahraich, Pant (1992) similarly showed that the average water use per ha by TWOs was 98 hours in Faizabad and 36 hours in Bahraich; water use by buyers was lower at 51.5 and 25.4 hours, respectively. Based on a sample survey of 400 farmers from Gorakhpur, Sultanpur, Mirzapur and Azamgadh districts of eastern UP, Kolavalli et al. (1992) found that whereas 90% of TWOs in Azamgadh and Sultanpur gave more than 2 irrigation turns to paddy, more than 75% of water buyers gave less than two irrigation turns. Then Kolavalli et al. (1992:46) noted: \"...a much smaller percentage of farmers without wells irrigated their paddy crop...It would suggest that paddy irrigation appears to be less remunerative particularly if irrigation is to be purchased.\"In 1996, water buyers in eastern UP paid Rs 26-30/hour of pumping from 5-hp diesel pumps with a yield of 18-20 m 3 /hour. Irrigating a hectare of paddy would need 70 hours and a hectare of wheat in rabi would need 100 hours costing Rs 1,960/ha and Rs 2,800/ha, respectively. Canal irrigation rates for paddy and wheat in UP have, for years, been Rs 180/ha and Rs 70/ha, respectively. Thus irrigating wheat and paddy with purchased tube-well water is nearly 20 times costlier than canal irrigation. It is not surprising that cash-starved water buyers economize in the use of purchased pump irrigation. An important aspect is also the steeply rising cost of pump irrigation in response to the rise in diesel prices. An early hypothesis in the South Asian debate on water markets was about the relationship between energy cost and pump irrigation prices, which emanated from a water seller's profit function and yielded the relation w = e/(e-1) * cwhere, w is the price of pump irrigation (Rs/hour), c is the incremental cost (Rs/hour) of pumping facing the seller-which, in the case of diesel pumps, is mainly the cost of diesel used per hour; and e is the price elasticity of demand for pump irrigation (see Shah 1993 for the derivation). Since a rational seller will sell only when e>1, e/(e-1) provides the multiple by which water price will exceed the incremental pumping cost. If e=1.4, water price will be 3.5 times the price of diesel/liter since a 5-hp diesel engine consumes, on average, 1liter/hour. And if the price of diesel increases by 10%, the price of water will rise by 35% too and not just enough to cover the increased diesel cost. In 1996, with the help of grassroots NGOs, this author constructed time series of diesel-pump irrigation prices in selected locations in eastern UP and north Bihar, which suggested that water prices increased every time diesel prices increased and the former increased substantially more than would be enough to cover the increase in diesel price. Figure 10 presents these data and also projects the likely impact of the recent 35% hike in diesel prices on pumpirrigation prices in eastern India; and depending upon the degree of competition in local water markets in different locations, we expect the 5-hp diesel-pump irrigation prices to rise to between Rs 40-65/hour from the present Rs 25-40/hour. Overall, then, even with broad and deep pump-irrigation markets that ensure small farmers' access to groundwater, questions still remain about the cost of such access. Two aspects are pertinent: first, water buyers are under greater pressure to economize on water use than pump owners, and this differential pressure increases with every increase in diesel price; and second, there is a transfer of wealth from water buyers to pump owners with progressive increase in diesel prices. Shah et al. (1997) estimated that every hour of pump The impact of 35% diesel price hike on pump irrigation prices (Rs/hour: 5-hp diesel pump). irrigation sold in eastern India contained a \"monopoly rent\" of Rs 10 in 1996 that would disappear if the market became perfectly competitive; assuming that each of the 2.2 million diesel pump owners in eastern India sells 100 h/yr., we can surmise that water buyers end up paying pump owners a monopoly rent to the tune of Rs 2,200 million/yr. With the 1999 hike in diesel prices by 35%, we believe this \"rent\" has more than doubled.The policy of the Government of UP on rural electrification did to catalyze pump irrigation markets what its PTW program did to initiate the revolution in the private tube wells. During the 1960s, governments as well as donors such as the World Bank placed great emphasis on rural electrification as a means to overall development, but particularly, of agricultural development through tube-well irrigation. As a result of this intensive effort, the number of electric tube wells (ETWs) rose rapidly, particularly in western UP, and to a lesser extent, even in eastern UP. The capital investment in electric pumps was higher because a portion of the cost of laying the cable from the transformer to the well site was charged to the TWOs. Diesel pumps were cheaper to buy but were less preferred because they were substantially costlier to operate. The high investment costs of ETWs encouraged their owners to operate their pumps at a high level of capacity utilization by supplying irrigation service to other farmers. Thus arose the new institution of pump-irrigation markets; and private ETWs began playing pretty much the same role as PTWs were envisaged to doviz., providing tube-well irrigation service to small and marginal farmers-but in a more service-oriented and economically profitable manner.However, by the early 1970s, the logistics of metering electricity supply and collecting the tariff was beginning to prove too much for the UP State Electricity Board (UP SEB), which had hired an army of meter readers to take readings on the rapidly growing numbers of household and tube-well connections in UP's vast countryside.12 The meter readers who were initially appointed on contract during the early 1960s soon unionized and eventually forced a populist Chief Minister to regularize them as government employees with manyfold increases in wages and benefits. Soon thereafter, the quality of meter reading declined, and so did the collection of electricity charges. It was easy to bribe or browbeat meter readers into underreporting the consumption or tampering with the meter; moreover, to beat metering, farmers began to pilfer power by hooking directly to power lines since there was little to deter them. These logistical problems multiplied manyfold when it came to dealing with metering electricity consumption for millions of tiny household users (with just 1-2 40-W bulbs). All in all, a major rethink on the logistics of metering and revenue collection in rural electricity supply had become inevitable.Around then, a 1973 study by the Rural Electrification Corporation encompassing several States found that the cost of metering electricity consumption by farmers and rural households was over 40% of the cost of the power itself! UP was not the only State that was facing these problems; all States did. So in 1975, when the SEB decided to get rid of metering of rural household and farm users, and switch to a flat monthly tariff unlinked to actual consumption, many other State governments were watching the implications with great interest; and in the following 5 years, most other Indian SEBs followed suit and changed from a metered to a flat electricity tariff, especially for agricultural users.The change to a flat tariff gave a powerful stimulus to pump irrigation markets; it raised the fixed cost but reduced the incremental pumping cost to almost zero. This meant that the ETW owners had a powerful incentive to sell more water; and competition amongst electric pump owners forced a lowering of the price of pump irrigation, improved the quality of service and, in general, created a buyers' market for pump irrigation. Comparative surveys across States during the 1980s showed that two 5-hp electric pump owners, one in Meerut (western UP) and the other in Basti (eastern UP), sold pump irrigation at Rs 5-6/hour whereas a similar electric-pump owner in Gujarat charged Rs 20/hour because he was paying for metered power use. Diesel pump owners in UP, who charged Rs 18-20/hour for a 5-hp pump in UP as elsewhere, began losing out in their competition with electric pump owners; there is some evidence to suggest that diesel pump owners in many areas were obliged to slash their pump irrigation prices to survive 12 UP has 110,000 villages; and many of these have 4-5 hamlets each. Consumption-based tariff involved metering, meter reading, meter repair and maintenance and revenue collection. In an effort to reduce cost-and to secure more committed and involved ground-level staff-the SEB had recruited local people to serve as meter readers on contractual appointments at lower salaries than the SEB's staff got as State government employees. Each meter reader had to monitor and report on around 100 meters per month. Less than 2 years after this arrangement was initiated, SEB inspections revealed that many meter readers sub-contracted the work to schoolboys at a fraction of their daily allowance while they busied themselves with their farms and other businesses. Soon, they began to save on even this and stopped taking and reporting the readings at all. So farmers would be billed on the basis of their average consumption over the past months. Some meter readers began to arbitrarily report hypothetical figures of consumption. Farmers also began breaking their meters so that they could be charged on the average of low consumption reported in earlier months. in the competition. All in all, the resource-poor farmers-who were mostly buyers of pump irrigation-had the best possible deal they could hope for in the early years after the change to a flat electricity tariff. 13 However, this state of happiness was proven short-lived. While changing from a metered to a flat tariff, the SEB was governed by the economics of power supply as well as by the politics of power. Compared to many other States, especially in South India, where political leaders used the change to a flat tariff as an opportunity to do away with power tariff itself, either fully or largely, in UP the flat tariff was fixed at a reasonable Rs 18 (US$1.3)/hp/ month at which the SEB would have been close to the breakeven point for the pre-change level of average electricity consumption, particularly since the flat tariff eliminated substantial costs of metering and pilferage associated with metered tariff. However, what the SEB had not planned for was the rapid increase in the electricity consumption per tube well after the change to the flat tariff. The very process that transformed pump-irrigation markets into a boon for the resource-poor farmers-and heralded a new promise for eastern UP's belated Green Revolution-was also playing havoc with the SEB's balance sheet. Ideally, the SEB should have put up the flat tariff with the rising of the average power consumption per tube well; and it did manage to raise it from Rs 25/hp/month in the early 1980s to Rs 30/hp/month in the late 1980s and further to Rs 50/hp/month in the early 1990s.14 This was creditable compared to many southern Indian States that used the flat tariff to supply free electricity. However, the increases in the flat tariff implemented over the 25-year period were far less than needed to cover the full cost of agricultural power supply.The medium and large farmers, especially in western UP, who owned most of the ETWs, were getting organized into a noisy, at times militant, formation under Mahendra Singh Tikait, a Jat farmer leader from western UP; and they put paid to every move by the SEB to put up the flat tariff. Like every monopolist, the SEB had control over either the price or the quantity of the product it supplied to a market segment but not both. In the post-flat-tariff years, the UP SEB increasingly faced erosion of its power to set the electricity price. Therefore, intuitively, it reached out for the only other lever at its command: supply. It brought in progressive restriction in the supply of power to agricultural users in an orderly and transparent manner. However, the farmer lobby quickly saw through the SEB's game and launched a fierce agitation leading the Chief Minister and other political leaders to publicly and repeatedly announce their resolve to maintain power supply to agriculture to a minimum of 18 hours/day. Something had to give; but since the government would not displease the militant Jat interests in western UP, the axe had to fall elsewhere. Thus began an invidious process of progressive rural de-electrification of eastern UP.According to Pant's analysis, some 91% of the TWOs in Faizabad and 76% in Bahraich sold pump irrigation; an average seller served 4 buyers in both districts. Some 33% and 17% of buyers in Faizabad and Bahraich, respectively, were themselves pump owners, but used purchased water to irrigate their far-flung parcels. An average buyer dealt with 2 sellers. Electrified TWOs-who had to pay a flat electricity tariff of Rs 25/hp/ month-sold water at Rs 3-5/hour. Generally, 3-hp TWOs charged Rs 3/hour and 5-hp TWOs charged Rs 5/ hour. Electrified TWOs also offered a lump sum irrigation contract; the average rate was Rs 313/acre for the whole season; in this arrangement, the buyer could take as many irrigation turns as needed when electricity was available. Diesel TWOs sold only on a per hour basis: at Rs 12/hour for a 3-inch delivery pipe and at Rs 14/hour for a 4-inch delivery pipe. Pump irrigation purchased from diesel pump owners was substantially costlier. The terms of pump irrigation sale also included an offer of credit. Part-payment was made in cash; this was typically half the cost of diesel; the rest was paid at the time of harvest.While the political leadership went on promising guaranteed power supply to agriculture, the SEB, powerless to perform positive acts of commission, took to unobtrusive acts of omission, and began systematically neglecting the maintenance of power supply infrastructure in some of the most backward areas of the State where the farmers were far less organized and militant than Jats in western UP. This process of omission was slow; cessation of investment in maintenance and repair-and the resulting erosion of the element-took time to take effect; but slowly and surely it did and began to translate in declining quality and reliability of power supply. By the close of the 1980s, only 1-1.5% of transformers in eastern UP used to be \"down;\" in the early 1990s, 20% of the transformers were found to be nonfunctional at any point in time (Tyagi 1995). Stolen cables stopped being replaced; broken-down transformers often took 6-12 months to fix. Although, technically, the SEB supplied close to guaranteed hours from power stations, electricity available at the wellhead went on a downward spin in terms of quantity; electricity was supplied 24 hours/day during the peak-monsoon and 3 hours/day in the peak-irrigation seasons to make up the required annual average. The flat tariff has many advantages for TWOs but only under an opportune electricity-supply environment in which even if rationed, reliable power is supplied at peak irrigation periods. What happened in eastern UP-and indeed in all of eastern India-during the 1980s was that agricultural power supply got concentrated during monsoons and, that too, during nights. In such an inopportune power-supply environment, 15 ETW owners began to find it increasingly difficult to operate their tube wells at a level of capacity utilization high enough to cover their fixed costs that included a flat tariff of Rs 40/hp/month. Although published State government data show some growth in agricultural power connections in eastern UP during the 1980s and the 90s, all indications from the field show that these have actually declined rapidly. During the late 1970s, one could find at least a dozen ETWs in a village in the Deoria district; in the course of my 1995 fieldwork, I had to visit a dozen villages before we could interview the owner of an ETW. As early as 1989, Sharma (1989) presented a paper lamenting the \"diesalization of eastern UP's groundwater sector\" at a workshop in Faizabad. In the course of his 1990 survey in Faizabad and Bahraich, Niranjan Pant's stratified random sample of 50 TWOs in Faizabad (just east of Lucknow in central UP) captured 22 ETWs; but his sample of 70 TWOs in Bahraich (deep in eastern UP) captured only 2 ETWs. 16 In trying to explain why eastern UP does not use its groundwater potential fully, Kolavalli et al. (1992) randomly selected 193 TWOs for their survey in the Gorakhpur, Sultanpur, Azamgarh and Mirzapur districts of eastern UP and found only 10 ETWs to survey. For their survey of 380 farmers in five districts of Gorakhpur Mandal, Shah et al. (1997) tried to include an equal number of electric, diesel and treadle pump owners, water buyers and non-irrigators; however, they found no \"pure\" non-irrigators and only 4 ETW owners in 25 villages. This trend is not evident in SEB's published figures on electrified tube wells because these do not 15 The term inopportune is used to contain a combination of circumstances that disable TWOs from making their tube wells economically viable.The circumstances mainly involve inadequate power supply, its unpredictability and erratic nature, most of the power supply coming in the nights, and most critically, and nonavailability of power for long periods (often running into several weeks) because of poor maintenance of power distribution infrastructure.16 Pant (1992:20) notes this dichotomy in his study of Faizabad and Behraich: \"In fact, in majority of the villages in Bahraich electricity was not available for tube-well irrigation and was available only at places of worship like mosques...Low use of electricity in Bahraich compared to Faizabad is manifested in the fact that on 31.3.86, there were 2,936 energized private tube wells in Bahraich compared to 16,600 in Faizabad…\" deduct the disconnected tube wells, which are treated as provisional disconnections. But in private discussions, the SEB managers readily conceded that 80% of the pump electrification targets were met in western and central UP, which have most of UP's dark and gray areas.In eastern UP, there are no dark blocks; in fact, all the blocks are white; but there is little or no power there; and the pace of electrification of new tube wells has been very slow. In a field trip across UP in 1996, we (Tushaar Shah, Marcus Moench and Christina Wood) found certain divisions to be \"electrically privileged;\" this was true particularly in Meerut, Agra and Muradabad in western UP, and Varanasi in eastern UP, which have a significantly higher ETW density than the rest of the UP. Even within these districts, ETW density is probably much higher within small pockets, especially near towns and along roadsides, as we found in Faizabad. Away from the towns and main roads, ETW density rapidly declines even in these electrically privileged districts.Officially, the SEB has spun an unbelievable story that goes against commonsense as well as the ground reality of eastern UP. According to the SEB values, since 1972-73, the number of private ETWs in UP has increased from 183,000 to over 700,000 in 1993-94 at a compound rate of around 10%/yr. The power supplied to these has increased at an even faster pace than their number, from 794 million units/yr. in 1972-73 to 9,500 million units in 1994-95, at a compound growth rate of 11.9%/yr. As a result, the average power consumption per ETW has gone up by over three times, from 4,072 units/yr. in 1972-73 to 11,800 units in 1994-95. The official SEB estimate of its losses from agricultural power supply shot up from Rs 1,630 million in 1993-94 to just under Rs 13,000 million in 1994-95. For every hour of pumping of an ETW, the SEB has been losing over Rs 6. 17 To break even on agricultural operations, the flat tariff would have to be raised from the present Rs 50/hp/month to Rs 209/hp/month. The story has been uncritically accepted by many. For instance, a report by Tata Energy Research Institute noted: \"Because of the low agricultural tariff and high magnitude of consumption of this sector, the SEB loses heavily in terms of revenue from agricultural power sales...\" (TERI 1996:73). Several studies of the World Bank have come to similar conclusions. But several inconvenient facts remain unexplained. First, why should farmers reject ETWs as resoundingly as they have done in eastern UP had power supply been so heavily subsidized in real terms? Second, the estimates made by field researchers of the hours of pumpage by ETWs imply a level of actual power consumption, which is a small fraction of the average claimed by the SEB. Third, accepting the SEB's estimates raises important questions about what 2.2 million diesel pumps are doing in UP's countryside and why diesel tube wells are growing at such a phenomenal rate.18 Finally, much evidence suggests that, if anything, rural power subsidies are concentrated in electrically privileged areas of western UP; in eastern UP, far from being subsidized, electric power is, in effect, heavily taxed. Consider the following. At the SEB's value of 11,800 kWh as the average power consumption per ETW/yr., and assuming the connected load to be 6-hp on average, the average private ETW should be operating over 2,500 h/yr. But except in small pockets of electrically privileged districts of western UP where studies show an average of 1,300-1,500 hours of annual operation, nowhere do ETWs in eastern UP-nay, eastern India-operate for more than 600-700 h/yr. The Faizabad sample of 18 ETW owners in Pant's 1992 study reported an average operation of 665 h/yr. In Shankar's study (1992:58) of a sample of 140 households in Allahabad, ETW owners reported the average operation to be 663 h/yr. A survey of 478 TWOs from Muradabad, Barabanki and Agra districts by the Operations Research Group in 1990 indicated that 70% of the sampled ETWs operated for less than 500 h/yr.; only 8% operated for more than 1,000 h/yr. Far from 11,800 kWh, on average, ETWs consumed 1,870 kWh/yr. in their Muradabad sample, 924 kWh/yr. in the Barabanki sample and 1,990 kWh in their Agra sample (ORG 1991:23). The average cost of power to these was thus Rs 2.89/kWh, far more than any other user category of the SEB. A 1981-survey by NABARD (1988) in Allahabad district in eastern UP showed that ETW owners operated their tube wells for an average of 636 hours and the average electricity cost/hour to them was Rs 0.77/kWh when the SEB claimed it realized only Rs 0.18/kWh from agricultural consumers (UP SEB 1996: 97). But in a similar evaluation in the electrically privileged Muzaffarnagar district in Meerut division, a sample of 42 ETWs operated, on an average, for 1,034 hours at Rs 0.36/unit (NABARD 1987). Tyagi (1995) found the average power consumption by a sample of 229 ETWs from all over UP at 2,566 kWh/yr., less than 25% of the SEB estimate of 11,800 kWh/yr. At a flat tariff of Rs 50/hp/ month, the average electricity cost is thus Rs 1.43/kWh, over 3.5 times the rate of Rs 0.43/kWH that the SEB claimed. Tyagi showed that for the bottom 10% of tube wells in the sample that operated for an average of 280 h/yr., the effective power cost rises to Rs 2.87/unit or Rs 13.08/hour. In the electrically privileged Kanpur district of western UP, where because of a more opportune power-supply environment, an average tube well operated for 774 h/yr., the cost declined sharply to 1.04/kWh or Rs 4.74/hour of operation. With this economics, it is not surprising that farmers in eastern UP switched to diesel engines en masse. A 6.5-hp diesel pump would cost Rs 9.50-10/hour in fuel in 1997; thus an ETW operating over 750 h/yr. is half as cheap to run as a diesel pump; but one operating at less than 300 h/yr. costs much higher to run. In the early 1990s, this made electricity sold to eastern UP's agriculture amongst the most expensive of all consumer categories: domestic users paid Rs 0.77/kWH; commercial users paid Rs 1.16/kWh; industries paid Rs 1.36/kWH; and eastern UP's agriculture paid an effective price of Rs 1.43/kWH.Until this stage, there are strong parallels between the pattern of evolution of groundwater development in eastern UP and the rest of eastern India, in particular, in north Bihar, north Bengal and coastal Orissa, which combine large volumes of undeveloped groundwater potential with a massive concentration of rural poverty. If UP tried a PTW program, so did west Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. If UP's PTWs failed in their promise to the poor, they failed even more resoundingly in Bihar and Orissa.The rest of the east Indian States mounted their rural electrification programs much the same way as UP did, but with a lag of 3-5 years. Except in southwest Bengal, elsewhere in eastern India too, private electrified tube wells grew in numbers-though not as rapidly as in UP-especially in western UP. UP changed from a metered to a flat tariff in 1975; Bihar and Orissa followed suit. Finally, as in eastern UP, a few years after the flat tariff was introduced, the power-supply environment throughout the eastern region began to deteriorate. Within each State, there were \"electrically privileged\" areas where the ruralelectricity infrastructure remained relatively better maintained and the power-supply environment remained in a reasonably good condition. In west Bengal, southern districts had a better power-supply environment and developed dynamic agrarian economies; north Bengal, with a poor power-supply environment failed to develop its extraordinary groundwater potential and stagnated. Bihar remained electrically underprivileged throughout; yet, the central region became less electrically underprivileged than north Bihar with its massive underdeveloped groundwater resources. The Orissa, Puri and Cuttak districts became electrically privileged; western Orissa ended up with a poor power-supply environment. In most respects, then, eastern UP became the forerunner of eastern India.But the parallels end here. With the decline in the power-supply environment, the development of groundwater irrigation in much of eastern India has all but stagnated. But in eastern UP, tube-well irrigation continued to be a boom sector. Eastern UP dealt with the crisis of deteriorating power supply by dieselizing its groundwater irrigation. Here, the number of private diesel pumps increased faster than the decline of the electric pumps. Some evidence of this trend is available in data collected at district level; however, these too only add new ETWs connected every year without deducting the number of those that are disconnected. Even so, as figure 11 shows, the pace of dieselization of eastern UP's groundwater irrigation sector is unmistakable. Equally unmistakable is the fact that the inopportune power-supply environment has been behind the strong preference for diesel pumps. A report by the Indo-Dutch UP Tube-Well Project MAC-IDTP (1989), citing Draft Annual Plan 1988-89, Volume I, of the Government of UP stated:\"The overall shortfall in realization of the Seventh Plan target of energization of private electrical tube wells is mainly due to cultivators' preference for diesel-driven sets. This preference derives from erratic and inadequate power supply in most areas and lower initial cost to cultivators for diesel sets.\" 20 There are many problems with the dieselization of groundwater irrigation. Diesel is a costlier energy source compared to electricity, in private as well as social terms, especially in eastern India, which produces more than half of its power from hydroelectric sources. Electricity is also cleaner compared to diesel. Electric pumps are easier and cheaper to maintain compared to diesel pumps that suffer heavy wear and tear. Finally, as we saw, diesel pumps produce a monopolistic pump-irrigation market that transfers wealth from resource-poor water Growth of electric and diesel tube wells in Gorakhpur, Maharajgunj and Deoria-Padrona districts, eastern UP. buyers to pump owners, and forces the buyers to economize on the use of water whose marginal social value, in the east Indian context, is negative. Despite all these, it would be appropriate to say that nothing else has produced as much welfare for the small and marginal farmers of eastern UP as diesel-pump-driven shallow tube wells. The central issue of interest is why the rest of eastern India was unable to dieselize its groundwater irrigation as rapidly as eastern UP did during the 1985-95 period.The inopportune power-supply environment was certainly a key reason behind the rapid increase in the number of diesel pumps in eastern UP during the 1980s. However, an equally important reason was the great success that the people of eastern UP made of another of the State government interventions to stimulate groundwater development. Around 1975, when the Government of UP decided to switch to a flat electricity tariff, the Reserve Bank of India, concerned about eastern India's failure to take off agriculturally, appointed a high-powered committee to explore the issue. This committee bemoaned the slow pace of groundwater development as the primary cause, and recommended a liberal subsidy to stimulate private groundwater development. Following this, the Government of UP launched a povertytargeted FBS under which the Minor Irrigation Department was to undertake the preparation of bore-wells (shallow tube wells) free of cost for small and marginal farmers; additionally, varying levels of subsidy were offered on diesel pumps to small and marginal farmers, matching the degree of their social and economic backwardness. The banks also chipped in with a loan to cover the down payment required from the farmer under a special refinancing arrangement from the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development. Bihar, west Bengal, Assam and Orissa followed suit with their own variants of pump-subsidy schemes. Soon enough, the Government of India also launched the \"Million Well Scheme\" with precisely the same objective, and targeting socially and economically backward farmers.Until the mid-80s, however, all these wellintentioned minor irrigation subsidy schemes had produced little minor irrigation in the most groundwater-rich parts of eastern India. When electric pumps dominated groundwater irrigation, the real barrier that kept the poorest from laying their hands on a pump was not the cost of the pump but the transaction costs, delays and the hassle of getting an electricity connection. ETW ownership during the 1970s was therefore highly scale-biased compared to the ownership of diesel pump sets during the 1980s and 90s. So, although the subsidy schemes covered electric as well as diesel pumps, the funds allocated to them remained grossly underutilized. Now that ETWs were being decommissioned in large numbers, farmers began to turn to diesel pumps, but they-particularly, small farmers from backward communities-found the hassle and \"transaction costs\" involved in accessing the FBS prohibitive and intimidating. A study in 1984 by the Delhi-based Society for Prevention of Wastelands Development concluded that even if all the paperwork of a small farmer were perfect, the decision on his application under the FBS took 11 months and scores of visits to the various offices involved: the Block Development Office, Minor Irrigation Department, bank offices and the District Rural Development Agency. Another set of rounds would begin once his application was approved, to get GI pipes and valves issued from the Minor Irrigation Department, diesel pumps issued from the stipulated dealers, and the bank loan released from the Lead Bank designated for each district. Several other restrictions were in force: for example, only members of the field staff of the Minor Irrigation Department were allowed to make the bore using the department's rig; only one or two predesignated brands of diesel pumps were available to the farmer. Moreover, the farmer was obliged to offer \"speed money\" at every office, which meant that by the time the tube well was commissioned, 35-40% of the subsidy had gone as \"speed money.\"This is still the situation in north Bengal, Orissa and, to a lesser extent, in north Bihar. Eastern UP however managed to break free and transformed the diesel-pump subsidy scheme into a powerful instrument of smallholder irrigation. During the mid-1980s, a series of changes occurred in the design and implementation of the FBS, which pitchforked the private dealer of diesel pumps to the role of the central coordinating mechanism for the scheme. These changes sharply reduced the transaction costs that small farmers faced in accessing the subsidy and loan scheme. The diesel-pump dealer became the one-stop-shop for farmers wanting to set up a tube well under the FBS. In the course of unstructured interviews with nearly 200 small farmers in the Gorakhpur, Maharajganj and Deoria districts of eastern UP, we found that the presence of the diesel-pump dealer was one of the best things to happen to the small farmers in the region; and that this dealer had been instrumental in transforming the much-berated FBS into a powerful intervention in groundwater development. All that an eligible small farmer has to do now is to provide his photograph and land documents to the dealer of the brand of diesel pump he prefers; the dealer then takes over and completes the entire process of getting approvals and clearances from the government departments involved and the bank. The pump and GI pipes are issued to the farmer on the same day; he is free to hire local rig operators to get his boring done, and inside of a week of applying, his tube well is commissioned. By then, the dealer has got all the formalities cleared and the transaction is completed. Scores of farmers we interviewed did agree that the cost of the pump without the subsidy would be lower by 8-10% but considered this a small sewa-shulk (service fee) 21 for the red carpet the dealer rolled out for them. By a rough estimate, over 800,000 small diesel-pump-operated tube wells have been installed in eastern UP under the FBS after 1985, which probably irrigate a gross area of 2.4-3.2 million ha of their owners' and water buyers' lands besides providing some much-needed vertical drainage to the region. By any reckoning, this rapid increase in the dieselpump density is at the heart of eastern UP's belated Green Revolution, which has still proved elusive to other flood-prone areas of eastern India such as north Bengal, coastal Orissa and north and central Bihar.What changes brought into play this virtuous \"dealer dynamic\" are neither clear nor fully explored. But from our discussions with pump dealers and \"beneficiaries\" throughout the region, the main procedural changes were: a) the requirement that only Minor Irrigation Department staff make free bores was given up, and farmers were allowed to get their bores done by numerous private rigging contractors who did the job quicker, cheaper and better; b) the insistence on the Minor Irrigation Department holding the stocks of one or two brands of pumps was abandoned; and the farmer was allowed to choose the brand he preferred; c) through another procedural modification, it was now possible for the banks to directly pay to the dealer for the diesel pump; the subsidy was adjusted in the farmer's account while the balance, treated as a loan, is to be repaid by the farmer in installments over 3 or 5 years.There is indicative evidence to suggest that these changes came about gradually in response to \"pulls\" from the dealer community to simplify the procedures for accessing the FBS. As the de-electrification of rural eastern UP gathered momentum, the demand for diesel pumps grew. The diesel-pump dealers saw a great business opportunity in the decline of ETWs; and each district and tehsil town of eastern UP saw the rise of an uncommonly large community (20-60) of diesel-pump dealers competing fiercely amongst themselves for increasing their market share in the growing market for diesel pumps. As the business grew, besides the brand-image and the dealer-image, the Unique Selling Proposition each dealer began to offer to his customers was the ease and speed of getting the FBS formalities completed at a low sewa-shulk. Large dealers 21 A good estimate of the service charge is provided by the \"discount\" of Rs 700-1,800 that the off-the-shelf buyer gets compared to a farmer applying for the loan-subsidy scheme. This \"discount\" on direct purchase without subsidy includes a) the unofficial payments (bribes)-that pump dealers have to pay in agencies authorized to approve the loan and subsidy; b) other money and time costs-mostly of running around from office to office-involved in getting the application processed; c) interest costs incurred during the processing time-between the date of the farmer's first approach with photo and land records when he collects his engine and pump, and the date when the check gets released. The discount varies over a long interval because large dealers, who get applications processed in fair-sized lots, are able to carry out these tasks at a lower average cost compared to small dealers who get applications processed in ones and twos; and because of intense competition, rather than using their lower cost to increase monopoly profits, large dealers demand a lower \"service charge\" to attract customers and increase their market share.with reputed brands of pumps had a head start over smaller ones and some of these sold 3,000-4,000 pumps/yr., and could, therefore, develop a different system of offering \"rents\" to various agencies involved in processing FBS applications; they often paid monthly installments rather than a \"piece rate\" that smaller dealers paid on a case-by-case basis; moreover, many large dealers began to keep a special team of staff whose sole job was to take a bunch of \"subsidy files\" every morning from office to office and get them cleared by the evening. Many of these large dealers thus were able to offer farmers highly rated brands of pumps under FBS for as little as 5% of the subsidy as a sewa-shulk. Smaller dealers are not as \"efficient\" as larger ones in cutting the transaction costs of FBS access but are restrained from levying a high sewa-shulk because of the price leadership role of large dealers in setting a reference service charge. It also seems that dealers, whom pump manufacturers offer pretty high retail margins varying from 18% to 30% of the sale price, gun for maximizing their sales and market share rather than taking a cut from the \"service charge,\" which therefore has little or no \"rent\" extracted by the dealers.How do we know that this so-called \"dealer dynamic\" has helped stimulate eastern UP's groundwater development? There is no direct macro-level evidence; the 1992 minor irrigation census, when it becomes available, will provide some direct district-wise data, which in comparison with the 1987 census data will provide a clearer picture. However, all field studies on well irrigation suggest that a large majority of private pumps are diesel pumps, they are owned by small and marginal farmers, they were acquired under the pump-subsidy scheme and, above all, they were installed in the late 1980s or early 1990s. Another indicative evidence is provided by the data on the offtake of institutional credit for minor irrigation (primarily, pumps and tube wells). Figure 12 shows the State-wise refinance provided for minor irrigation Growth of NABARD refinance for tube-well construction in Indian Sates: 1982Sates: -83/1996-97. -97. by the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, which is a very good proxy for the offtake of pumps under the loan-subsidy scheme. Clearly, it shows that while the rest of eastern India has been lukewarm in using NABARD's refinance facility, UP has beaten even States like Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra where private smallholder irrigation has always been a strong sector.This transformation of the FBS into an instrument of expanding small-farmer ownership of diesel pumps and bore-wells has powerful and far-reaching ramifications. On the downside, the pump dealer has been widely discredited as the shady operator on the scene precisely because he is at the center stage of the entire scheme and lay-observers see him as the recipient of the bribe that is the sewa-shulk; even some pump manufacturers we interviewed considered them with disdain in the wheelerdealer class; it is also likely that the reformed FBS is a trifle more prone to mis-targeting. However, the vastly beneficial overall impacts of the FBS under \"dealer dynamic\" have been commonly overlooked: for one, it has expanded eastern UP's pump density (measured as the number of 5-hp pumps per 100 ha of farmlands) 22 Northern region: Haryana, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Rajasthan; east and northeastern: Bihar, Orissa, west Bengal, Sikkim, Assam, Manipur and other northeastern States; western: Maharashtra, Gujarat and Goa; southern: Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamilnadu; central: Madhya Pradesh and UP. It must be noted that eastern UP's 16 districts, which are an important part of eastern India are included in central India along with the rest of UP; this means that eastern India's poverty as well as groundwater resources are understated in these charts.from less than 10 in the mid-1970s to 40-50 in the early 1990s; despite room for mis-targeting, FBS has probably single-handedly done far more to put a pump in the hands of the poor than any other policy initiative ever. The increased intensity of competition among pump-irrigation sellers and its beneficial results further leverage the overall impact of high pump density for ultra-poor water buyers. Above all else, the increased diesel-pump density has greatly moderated the disastrous impact of the rural de-electrification of eastern UP; its role in ushering in eastern UP's ongoing agrarian transformation becomes all too clear when one compares today's eastern UP with regions like north Bengal, which have little rural electrification and where the dieselpump subsidy scheme works pretty much like the way it did in eastern UP in the early 1980s. Eastern UP is already catching up with western UP, Punjab and Haryana, in terms of its agricultural productivity, land-use intensity and other parameters of agrarian growth; but the rest of eastern India, barring small pockets, is still stagnating in traditional technologies and methods, at least 20 years behind eastern UP.Eastern UP, a microcosm of eastern India and the GMB basin, has also served as the latter's leader and pathfinder. Our chief argument in this report is that there have been striking parallels between eastern UP and the rest of eastern Indian States in the public policies pursued to stimulate groundwater development and how they have failed to achieve their objectives. To be sure, the gulf between eastern and western UP is analogous to the gulf between eastern India and the rest of India. In illustrating this gulf, we have derived figure 13 based on NABARD (1995);22 and from the analysis by Fan, Hazell and Thorat (1998) presented in table 3. Figure 13 shows that eastern India contains over a fifth of India's blocks but it is home to nearly 88 million, or a third of India's rural poor. One department in which the eastern region has a great scope for poverty-focused development is groundwater; it has 25% of India's usable groundwater resources; and less than 20% of it is developed. And as we reviewed earlier, developing this resource further can not only create livelihoods and agricultural growth but also alleviate the chronic problems of waterlogging and flood-proneness that have bewitched the region. That there need be no worries on account of overexploitation of groundwater in the eastern region is also suggested by figure 12, which shows that only 4 of India's 600 \"dark\" blocks are in the eastern region. Eastern UP's experience provides us many lessons for jump-starting eastern India's groundwater economy; but the most important is that public policies and programs-such as the public and community tube-well programs and rural electrification program-have not worked as planned. Based on our analysis, a strategy of stimulating poverty-focused groundwater development in eastern India needs to have at least five elements:• first, eastern India needs to seriously reconsider its existing minor irrigation programs run by government bureaucracies, which gobble up funds but deliver little minor irrigation;• second, while the electricity-supply environment is in total disarray, innovative ideas need to be piloted to test alternative approaches to efficient metering and Distribution of blocks, dark blocks, rural poor, groundwater resource and NABARD refinance for minor irrigation across five regions of India. collection of electricity dues from millions of small users;• third, programs are needed to improve the efficiency of electric as well as diesel pumps;• fourth, there is a need to promote smaller than 5-hp diesel pumps and improved manual irrigation technologies;• finally, above all else, east Indian States need to reform their pump subsidy schemes in the style that UP has done so as to ameliorate the pump-capital scarcity, which lies at the heart of the problem. We deal with each of these at some depth in concluding this essay.With the plethora of studies and evaluations that testify to the resounding failure of PTW programs in eastern UP and elsewhere in India, cessation of support to such programs should be a forgone conclusion; however, this is far from the case. In many States, new programsmostly donor-supported-are afoot to make new investments in group-owned and -managed minor irrigation assets, or to rehabilitate past investments. This steadfast devotion of donors and governments to the notion that the poor can access benefits of groundwater irrigation only through government-or community-managed tube wells seems particularly unfounded in eastern India where the conditions are best suited for small-scale owner-managed tube wells. In eastern UP, at least, the PTW program tried to harness scalar economies and new technologies-such as deep tube wells, piped distribution and dedicated power supply-to cover 100 ha or more of design command under each tube well. But in many other east Indian States, government departments are building small tube wells of the type that private farmers have and operate these through a bureaucracy at levels, which do not even cover their operators' salary. At the end of a spell of fieldwork in Puri district of Orissa, I found:\"Of the 99 Lift Irrigation (LI) schemes that Orissa Lift Irrigation Corporation's (OLIC) Pipli office is responsible for in these three blocks, 61 were functional; last year , according to OLIC records these irrigated 1,113 acres (average command area/LI is 18.2 acres) and collected an irrigation fee of Rs 216,600 (average fee collection/LI is Rs 3,550; average fee/acre is Rs 194.60). The economics of the LIs seems designed for unviability in perpetuity. Four new schemes were constructed in 1996-97 at a total cost of Rs 2.4 million; if this represents the general picture, the average 5-hp LI, which commands an average of 6-7 acres, costs Rs 600,000 apiece or Rs 90,000+/acre or over Rs 200,000/ha of net irrigated area commanded! Farmers build irrigation potential at 10% of this cost. This must be among the costliest irrigation potential created in a region, which abounds in groundwater and surface water.It is crazy that DRDAs and NABARD are throwing away good money after bad, but it is even crazier that a thoughtful donor like Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) keeps supporting OLIC's new LI schemes\" (Shah 1998b).Similarly, in assessing the effectiveness of the Dutch-supported minor irrigation program in north Bengal, I found that: \"...the critical challenge of minor irrigation development-and, indeed, of overall agrarian growth-in north Bengal is of dealing with the pump capital scarcity…of raising its pump density of around 1-3 pumps/100 ha of net sown area to 25-40. This requires programs designed to put the pump into the hands of the poor…north Bengal, instead, has been busy building minor irrigation miscellanies that gobble funds but make little net addition to minor irrigation. Most of India gave up building new PTWs and big community-managed river lift irrigation schemes 15 years ago; but north Bengal-which does not need deep tube wells in the first place-has continued building them. [Then, the] use of buried pipeline distribution systems in north Bengal-a flat terrain with the marginal value of groundwater at subzero levelsseems to be a doubtful strategy. True, large group tube wells with buried pipelines are doing well in north Gujarat and Maharashtra where farmers have money and enterprise but not groundwater. North Bengal's farmers have too much water but no pump capital; collective management of lift irrigation systems is neither necessary nor worthwhile for them. The correct minor irrigation strategy for Gujarat is clearly a wrong minor irrigation strategy for north Bengal; it should be the reverse of it\" (Shah 1998a).The first important initiative needed to stimulate groundwater development is to discontinue forthwith these costly programs of building public-and community-managed deep tube wells and large river lift irrigation schemes. Countless examples show that these are costlier to build and operate compared to small private tube wells, they are extremely difficult to manage, and use technologies for which there is no rationale in eastern India.During the 1980s, I showed that, in eastern India with abundant groundwater, a reasonably high flat electricity tariff, accompanied by a carefully rationed agricultural power supply, can be a powerful way of transforming groundwater markets into an effective instrument of small farmer development without subsidizing electricity (Chambers et al. 1987;Shah 1993). The argument had several propositions: a) a flat tariff reduces the real cost of supplying power to farmers by saving substantial costs of metering and revenue collection; b) it curtails the powerful incentive to pilfer under the metered tariff scheme; c) it forces ETW owners to sell more water by charging lower prices to buyers who are mostly the resource-poor; d) where diesel-pump owners compete with ETW owners in local water markets, the latter exercise a disciplining influence on the former and oblige them to sell water at a price lower than what they would have set; e) the Electricity Board can counter the propensity of ETW owners to expand their use of power under the flat tariff scheme either by raising the flat tariff to cover the average full cost and/or by carefully rationing high-quality power supply to agriculture. The veracity of these propositions has been proven by the experience of many Indian States, including eastern UP where, even today, ETW owners who remain sell water at a much lower price than that charged by diesel-pump owners and are a disciplining influence on local water markets. Many States have raised their flat tariff to reasonable levels. Haryana has raised its flat tariff to Rs 65/hp/month-at which its electricity subsidies have been maintained at manageable levels. Gujarat has a progressive flat tariff of Rs 195/hp/yr. for smaller than 7.5-hp tube wells going up to Rs 360/hp/yr. for tube wells bigger than 15-hp. However, this analysis presupposed fine-tuned management of electricity supply and pricing policies that eastern State governments and electricity boards have proven unequal to. As a result, the flat tariff has produced nearly opposite results in eastern India-of its rapid rural deelectrification. However, the critical role of rural electrification in eastern India's agricultural economy needs to be recognized. For one, in real terms, electricity is cheaper than diesel. Second, it is cleaner. Third, since over half of eastern UP's electricity is generated from hydroelectric projects, it makes good sense to promote its use for the region's agricultural development. Finally, as we reviewed earlier, east Indian agriculture, in effect, suffers from negative electricity subsidies; and if Central and State governments are willing to commit substantial public funds to subsidize canal irrigation and PTW programs, there is a strong case for removing the effective tax on agricultural power consumption by creating an opportune power-supply environment in the region.No matter how urgent the need for improving eastern India's power-supply environment, may be for the region's agricultural development, it is unlikely that such improvement and the investments needed for them will come about without exploring radically new ways of pricing rural power supply, especially because dieselization of pump irrigation has provided an effective \"safety valve\" that will reduce the intensity of popular discontent. The existing literature offers no insights into how best to do this. The central issue is of reducing the SEB's metering and collection costs by drastically reducing the number of power-supply points that the SEB directly monitors. One idea worth experimenting is some variation of electricity cooperatives that became hugely successful in rural US in the early decades of the last century and that has also worked in Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh though not very successfully. Basically, the Indian electricity cooperatives have been doing power distribution; they buy power in bulk and distribute it to their members; the Electricity Board finds it useful because they are in a better position to contain pilferage and collect electricity bills at lower costs. An alternative that uses the same principle is to invite Gram Panchayats (Village Councils) to undertake the distribution of power within the village and collect electricity dues. In such an arrangement, the SEB can maintain one central meter for the village as a whole and charge the Panchayat based on metered consumption by the village. The Panchayat can then monitor power consumption by both domestic and agricultural consumers and recover electricity dues from them. The arrangement can be attractive if the SEB can pass on to the Panchayats its own metering and collection costs, which are huge and were estimated to be nearly 45-50% of the actual cost of agricultural power supply. Efficient Panchayats can then transform electricity retailing into an income-generating proposition. An inferior alternative is to try private powerdistribution contractors who will be charged on consumption recorded in a central SEB meter and who, in turn, retail power to individual users.An important technological device that can make such decentralized retailing of electricity is the prepaid electricity cards that, for example, have been vigorously promoted by Eskom, the South African electricity utility to small, dispersed consumers. Eskom discovered the usefulness of the prepaid cards in meeting precisely the same challenge that Indian SEBs are facing, viz., of charging for power based on use by large numbers of tiny users scattered over a vast area. For the power supplier, this technology drastically reduces the cost of metering and charge-collection; for the users, it offers a transparent device to plan and monitor their electricity consumption. The prepaid card technology may be expensive for low volumes; but for the kind of large volumes that rural power consumers in India offer, the cost of the technology can be very affordable; and largescale user acceptance can be ensured if the SEBs transfer part of the savings to users while improving the quality of power supply to adopters. Finally, when combined with prepaid cards, decentralized retailing and charging for power become a distinctly more feasible proposition.A critical issue in eastern India's groundwater irrigation is energy use in pumping and the measures to improve it; while its efficiency dimensions are well documented its equity dimensions are not. The subject has been studied since the early 1970s and a general empirical conclusion is that 30-35% of the energy actually used by irrigation pump sets can be saved through \"rectification\" of pump sets. It is suggested that against the maximum achievable \"system efficiency\" of 54% for electric pump sets and 20% for diesel pump sets, observed efficiencies are sometimes as low as 13% and 5%, respectively. Reasons? The subsidized flat electricity tariff and the ignorance of farmers about selection, operation and upkeep of the pump. S. M. Patel, an agricultural engineer based in Ahmedabad who pioneered thousands of pump rectification experiments throughout India, has asserted that replacing only the foot-valve and suction pipe increases the water output of diesel pumps by 30%. But as table 4 shows full-scale rectification-involving appropriately matched foot-valve, suction pipe, delivery pipe, pump and engine-can increase the discharge of a diesel pump by 85% and cut diesel consumption/hour by 17% (Patel and Pandey 1989;Reidhead 1999).Independently of S. M. Patel's work, some Dutch-supported shallow tube-well projects using diesel engines in north Bengal also found energy efficiency of these pumping systems unacceptably low. Experiments on pump The results have been mixed; and an important reason is that farmers are unable to meet the exacting conditions of maintenance, repair and spare-parts that high-fuel efficiency demands (Reidhead 1999). Nevertheless, the reasons for persisting with the pump-rectification programs are compelling. Existing programs are driven primarily by the energy efficiency goal and secondarily by the pollution-control goal. Reidhead (1999) estimates that rectification of all 5.4 million diesel pump sets in India can save 1 billion liters of diesel every year, or an annual economic gain of Rs 28 billion for a capital investment of Rs 48 billion. But an important additional reason, at least to push the diesel-pump rectification program, is equity. We examined the conceptual and empirical basis of the argument that asserts the price at which diesel pump owners sell water to resource-poor water buyers is linked directly with the cost of diesel consumed per hour by a multiple that tends to be \"sticky.\" Because the sale of pump irrigation is transacted on the basis of hours of pumping rather than on the quantity of water, the cost of inefficiency of the pumps gets transferred to water buyers in two ways: for the same price/hour, buyers get less water than they would get from a rectified pump; second, rectified pump owners would be able to charge a lower price as a competitive strategy because they use less diesel per hour of operation. It is highly plausible then that a group of rectified diesel-pump owners competing with inefficient diesel-pump owners in a village would enjoy a powerful competitive advantage over the latter, create welfare gains for the water buyers in terms of doubly reduced cost per unit of water, and generate strong incentives for the rest of the diesel-pump owners to rectify their pump sets. Figure 14, which explores the profitmaximizing strategy of a water seller, suggests that after pump rectification, which lowers his marginal cost of water production, he would be induced to sell a Q 1 amount of water that is more than Q 0 , which he sold earlier at a profitmaximizing price P 1 , that is lower than P 0 , which he charged before pump rectification.C, much lower than the temperature at which diesel engines are designed to operate. The NBTDP experiment attached a 25-liter water drum mounted on a bracket and welded to the delivery pipe. An inlet hose at the bottom of the drum leads the water into the engine; after circulating in the engine, the water is discharged back into the drum through an outlet at the top of the drum. The temperature of the circulating water stabilizes at 75 0 C and is replenished every 2 hours. 25 In north Bengal, as elsewhere in the Ganga basin-where suction heads range from 2 to 5 meters, a 5-hp engine proves oversized; here, pumps use only 2.3-2.5-hp and at 1,500 rpm, engines operate at part-load and therefore at low efficiency. Decreasing the engine speed to 1,100 rpm, the lowest possible speed, the power output is reduced to 3.7-hp, which is still too much. The speed (rpm) is reduced by counteracting the spring on the fuel pump with a rubber band.The fourth element of the strategy for groundwater-led rural regeneration in the Ganga basin is the promotion of small pumps and improved manual irrigation technologies. In arguing for the pump-rectification programs, we noted that the shallow tube wells and dug-wells in the Ganga basin cannot use all the power of a 5-hp engine because the suction head is very low; and that, at full rpm, the pumps effectively use just around 2-2.5-hp. The ideal solution would be to offer 2-or 2.5-hp diesel engines in this region; however, after 50 years of groundwater development, the Indian dieselpump manufacturers have not effectively promoted anything smaller than a 5-hp diesel engine that might drive an irrigation pump. Even today, only two manufacturers-Greves Cotton and Sriram Honda offer a 1.95-hp diesel/ kerosene pump, which is popular in parts of the Chhotanagpur plateau; but it is difficult to find pumps of this size elsewhere in the basin. For a long time, the industry kept arguing that the market for small diesel pumps is very small. It was also suggested that the 5-hp diesel engine is versatile because it can be used to run a thresher or a generator set. The key reason, it seems, is that the small pumps marketed by the Indian manufacturers do not offer a significant price advantage compared to the 5hp pumps nor are they particularly fuel-efficient in the field conditions as some of the Chinese small pumps are proving to be in Bangladesh. If the import of micro-diesel pumps had been allowed, small farmers, especially in the Indian side of the Ganga basin, would probably have taken to them in large numbers, as Bangladesh farmers have taken to Chinese micro-diesel pumps.The availability of diesel pumps in a range of hp ratings would expand the choices available to the farmers to adopt a pump that fits his farm size. It would also help refine the pump-irrigation market; smaller pumps would be able to sell at a lower price because they are more fuel-efficient; this would also influence the competition within local water markets. Smaller pumps will also promote energy efficiency. Finally, since smaller pumps Impact of pump rectification on the economics of a water seller.will also be correspondingly cheaper to acquire as well as to operate, they will be more appropriate and accessible to small and marginal farmers.Indeed, the thumping response that improved manual technologies-such as treadle pumps-have received in Bangladesh and also in eastern India underscores the point that small farmers' capital investment decisions are highly price-sensitive. The hallmark of the treadle pump is that it costs in the neighborhood of Rs 750 to buy, it does not necessitate recurring cash outlays on diesel or kerosene, and it can be conveniently operated by men, women or children; and at a discharge of 0.9-1.1 l/s, it can easily irrigate half an acre of vegetables or even paddy. The treadle pump is an outstanding example of how access to groundwater irrigation can significantly improve the livelihoods of the ultra-poor. Many studies have tried to assess the impacts of the technology; the most recent one (Shah et al. 2000:1) concluded that: \"a) the treadle pump technology does \"selfselect\" the poor, although the first-generation adopters tend to be the less poor; b) it transforms smallholder farming systems in different ways in different subregions; in north Bengal and Bangladesh, adopters take to cultivation of HYV rice in the boro season; elsewhere, adopters turn to vegetable cultivation and marketing; c) it results in increased land-use intensity as well as \"priority cultivation;\" adopters provide crop-saving irrigation in a large part of their holdings but practice highly intensive farming in the \"priority plot;\" d) average crop yields on \"priority plots\" tend to be much higher than those obtained by farmers using diesel pumps or other irrigation devices; e) the income impact varies across households and regions; but US$100/yr. as an average increase in annual net income seems a conservative estimate. Less-enterprising adopters achieve fuller employment at an \"implicit wage rate\" that is 1.5-2.5 times the market rate. The more enterprising take to intelligent commercial farming and earn substantially more. For a marginal farmer with $12-15 to spare, there could hardly be a better investment than a treadle pump, which has a benefit/cost ratio of 5, an IRR of 100% and a payback period of a year. It thus ideally fills the need of the marginal farmers. The challenge lies in its marketing; exceptional ingenuity seems required to put the treadle pump in the hands of millions of the rural poor. In Bangladesh, where this has become possible, over a million pumps so far sold probably do not account for a large proportion of irrigated area but have certainly reached a significant proportion of Bangladesh's rural poor.\"Finally, and above all, the eastern States need a drastic reform of their pump subsidy and credit schemes. As a region (including eastern UP) that is home to more than a third of India's rural poor and that commands a third of the country's groundwater resources, one would have imagined that eastern India would also get a corresponding share in minor irrigation credit. Yet, only 7% of NABARD's minor irrigation refinance-representing the total offtake of minor irrigation credit-goes to eastern India. It is important to recognize that this poor offtake does not reflect the absence of need or demand for subsidy support; nor does it reflect NABARD's unwillingness to push credit for tube wells in eastern India. Above all, it reflects the difficulty, hassle and transaction costs of accessing pump-subsidy and loan schemes as they are designed and operated by State governments. Indeed, the first-best solution is to remove pump subsidies altogether; in our analysis, pump prices in India would fall by 30-40% if pump subsidies were removed and free import of Chinese pumps was allowed. In Pakistan, which meets both these conditions, pump prices are 35-40% lower than in India, where pump subsidies and import restrictions have kept prices artificially inflated (see, e.g., Shah et al. 2000). However, if pump subsidies have to be maintained, their design and operation need to ensure smooth access and freedom from hassle and bribes in accessing these. This can be understood by the examples of north Bengal (Shah 1998b), where the pump subsidy scheme has become an instrument of political patronage and of Orissa where it has become a bureaucratic spoils system (Shah 1998a;1998b).In Coochbehar and Jalpaiguri districts of north Bengal-which are as flush with groundwater resources and equally bewitched by the problem of rural poverty as eastern UP-a scheme has existed for long to rapidly augment private stock of pump capital; however, a recent assessment of minor irrigation policy in north Bengal showed that the subsidy scheme of the latter has been systematically co-opted by the State's minor irrigation administration and the Panchayati Raj institutions; and the process of accessing the scheme has been made so lengthy, complex and laborious that small farmers, without backing in the political system, have completely given up hope of ever benefiting from it (Shah 1998a).The procedure for accessing the pump subsidy in north Bengal involves the following steps: 1) the aspirant, equipped with necessary documentation, gets his request registered with the Gram Panchayat; 2) once the Gram Panchayat clears his request, a Gram Panchayat member has to recommend his name to the Block Development Officer; 3) the application is discussed in periodic meetings of the Bank, Gram Panchayat Pradhan and Panchayat Samiti (Block Council) member concerned to assess the creditworthiness and eligibility of the aspirant; 4) if the aspirant clears this stage, his application is completed and forwarded to the bank with the recommendation of the Panchayat Samiti; 5) after this, the bank claims the subsidy from the DRDA; 6) the bank releases the loan but only after the DRDA reimburses the subsidy; 7) the bank issues the Delivery Order to the beneficiary who can go and claim his diesel pump. The procedure generally takes 1 year or more; in recent times, it has seldom got completed because banks, facing mass defaults in government-subsidy schemes, are dragging their feet.A major deterrent is the \"quota\" system. Each district, each Panchayat Samiti and each Gram Panchayat has a quota fixed by the government and Zilla Parishads. For a long time, the bulk of the quota got used up by Gram Panchayats buying subsidized diesel pumps and stocking them ostensibly for renting out to small and marginal farmers. 28 We found all-round frustration with the pump-subsidy scheme, which was matched only by their frustration in accessing the Gram Panchayat diesel-pumps-for-renting. Even farmers who were Gram Panchayats or Panchayat Samiti members thought the procedure to access the loan-subsidy scheme to be very lengthy, complex and tiresome; so politically unconnected small farmers seldom tried it. A dealer in oil engines we met in Jalpaiguri lamented that a) the system of processing the loan-subsidy in west Bengal is extremely complex and takes enormous time; b) the dealer has no role in it; he comes into the picture only after all the loan-subsidy formalities are completed; and c) this affects the demand for pumps, which can be potentially large. Another prominent and experienced diesel-pump dealer of Coochbehar, however, went to the heart of the problem of why the subsidy-loan scheme here does not function quite like it does in eastern UP. He said that the pump dealer has a very limited marketing role in north Bengal; no buyer approaches the dealer until his application has been cleared at all the steps of the loansubsidy process; so all that the dealer can do is to scout for farmers whose applications are already approved and try to sell his brand to him. The transaction cost of influencing the Panchayat decision-making process is very high; therefore, the diesel-pump dealer in north Bengal has not been very aggressive.In Orissa whose capital is Bhubaneshwar, a 50% subsidy is available on the cost of diesel as well as on electrified tube wells but the entire process of subsidy approval and supply of equipment is controlled by the Orissa Agro-Industries Corporation (OAIC) pretty much as the pump subsidy was administered in UP before it was reformed in the mid-1980s but the process is faster. The procedure here is: a) the farmer approaches the OAIC office with a completed form and required documentation; b) he gets the necessary clearance from the Agriculture Department; c) he deposits Rs 1,000 for test drilling; d) the OAIC makes an estimate of the total cost of the tube well; e) the farmer deposits 50% of the estimated cost with the OAIC; f) the pump and pipe are released immediately; and the bore-well gets commissioned in 7-8 days by any of the approved contractors of the OAIC. The OAIC people claimed that there is minimum hassle and delay; although the subsidy has to be approved by the Bhubaneshwar office, which often takes 4-5 months, the OAIC releases it to the farmer immediately; so the farmer does not have to wait. Several farmers we talked to agreed that hassle, running around from-this-government-office-to-that and delay are not the problems of availing of the OAIC subsidy; the problem is that there is little or no real subsidy left for the farmer; the bulk of it is swiped by the OAIC in the form of inflated cost estimates. The estimates made by the OAIC, based on which 50% subsidy is claimed, are so much higher than the market prices that effectively the farmer gets very little real subsidy. This is true about all the agroequipment that the OAIC supplies on a 50% subsidy. In the course of fieldwork in the Puri district of Orissa in 1998, I found that the market price of the best brands of hand pumps ranged from Rs 290 to Rs 520; one dealer offered confidently to install any make of hand pump successfully for Rs 1,500; but at a local OAIC office, he was told that the unit cost of the hand pump (only the pump) is Rs 2,776 on which the farmer gets a subsidy of Rs 1,388, four times the market price of a hand pump (Shah 1998b). I also interviewed farmers who withdrew their applications for the subsidy scheme after they found that the cost estimates made by the OAIC were more than twice they would incur if they went direct to the market; in effect, thus there was a negative subsidy. In the case of hand pumps and diesel pumps, the farmer always has the option to go to the private dealers and not claim subsidy; but in the case of treadle pumps, the OAIC is a monopoly supplier. Manufacturers of treadle-pumps were willing to offer treadle pumps at Rs 785 each; but the OAIC brought the treadle pump under their subsidy list, priced it at Rs 1,400 and offered a subsidy of 50%. In Orissa, thus, the process of claiming the pump subsidy is smooth and fast, but there is effectively very little real subsidy to the claim. No wonder, then, that private investment in pump irrigation has not responded to the government's offer of the 50% subsidy.Clearly, between them, eastern UP, north Bengal and Orissa offer us three models of \"rent-seeking\" from the monopoly that different groups of decision makers enjoy over the power to grant approval to loans/subsidy schemes. In north Bengal, the monopoly is enjoyed by members of the ruling political formation who use it as patronage to command and strengthen allegiance and political support; but since this objective is not consonant with the objectives of nationalized banks and NABARD, they have reduced their participation. In Orissa, the monopoly is vested in the Corporation, which has effectively skimmed the bulk of the subsidy by over-costing; as a result, the \"demand pull\" for the loan-subsidy scheme from the farmers itself has been weak. In eastern UP, the absolute monopoly power itself is diffused through the competitive dealer dynamic resulting in a win-win situation for all: dealers interested in increasing their sales and market share find in the FBS a powerful instrument; banks are happy because dealers take part-responsibility for recovering the loans; staff in relevant government and bank offices are happy because their total rents are large (though the piece rate is lower); and farmers are supremely happy because for a small sewa-shulk dealers roll the red carpet for them, and get their tube wells commissioned inside of 10 days.There is a strong case for the rest of eastern India to redesign their pump-subsidy scheme à la eastern UP. Probably the most important first step to doing this is to recognize that the primary purpose of minor irrigation policy in east Indian States is to put the pumps in the hands of the small and marginal farmer. Second, the government should discontinue all allocations to government-and communitymanaged minor irrigation schemes since all available evidence shows that these fail to produce sustainable minor irrigation. Third, concentrating available financial resources for minor irrigation in the pump-subsidy scheme should create a general sense of resource sufficiency; similarly, NABARD too should help create the impression that all eligible loan applications will be processed and sanctioned. Creating this sense of sufficiency is important in breaking the monopoly rents that the power to approve loan and subsidy applications creates in bureaucracies. Fourth, the farmer should be given freedom to choose whatever brand of pump and engine he wants to buy; he should also have the freedom to choose his own contractor to make his bore-well. Fifth, the procedures to access the pump loan/subsidy scheme should be streamlined and rationalized as in UP. Finally, the dealer as well as the local administration should be vigorously involved in the recovery of loans.It has to be concluded, then, that the story of groundwater-based livelihood creation in eastern India is one of failed public initiatives but one of successful adaptive responses by private agents. It has long been recognized that rapid development of groundwater irrigation in this region can create massive welfare for the poor by energizing the region's predominantly agrarian economy. Yet, the public and community tube-well program initiated by the government and supported by many donors has, in retrospect, been a resounding failure. The Rural Electrification Program, hugely funded by the World Bank, could also have stimulated much groundwater irrigation; however, the 1980s saw progressive \"de-electrification\" of eastern India's countryside, and a rapid decline in electricity use in the region's agriculture. Finally, while the public-sector financial institutions channelized massive resources to support groundwater development in western and southern India, where overexploitation of the resources has been reaching critical proportions, eastern India, which has much unutilized groundwater potential, has received a much smaller amount of institutional credit than its fair share.In the face of such public-policy failures, it is not surprising that groundwater development in the Ganga basin has been far slower than elsewhere in the subcontinent. The redeeming aspect has been adaptive responses of private actors that, in eastern UP and north Bihar, have stimulated private groundwater development and catalyzed a belated Green Revolution. Here, the failure of the PTW program was overshadowed by the rise of pervasive pump-irrigation markets; and the impact of rural \"deelectrification\" was offset by the rapid dieselization of groundwater irrigation. An alternative to the high fuel cost of diesel-pump irrigation too was promoted-not by the government-but by the International Development Enterprises, a private NGO, which promoted treadle-pump irrigation as a technology for the poor. Finally, a hassle-ridden FBS was transformed into an instrument of small farmer development by spontaneous \"dealer dynamic\" in eastern UP and north Bihar. The moral of the story is clear: tube-wellinduced agrarian dynamism that we find in eastern UP and north Bihar in recent years can spread to all of eastern India and Nepal terai if public policy makers learn correct lessons from the experience of these two subregions.The object of this policy paper has been to understand these lessons. Our key conclusion is that much public policy effort aimed to stimulate groundwater-based livelihood creation has so far been misdirected and infructuous. In future, the best role for public policy lies in catalyzing and supporting private action. The strategy outlined to do this suggests five points of attack:• Discontinue government minor irrigation programs; instead focus on private tube wells as the primary mode for groundwater development.• Improve the electricity-supply environment for agriculture by reintroducing metered tariff, decentralized retailing of electricity, and the use of prepaid electricity cards.• Initiate planned interventions to improve the energy efficiency of agricultural pumping sets.• Introduce small diesel pumps and manual irrigation technologies for vegetable growers and marginal farmers.• Remove the pump subsidies while also opening up the imports of Chinese pumps; if doing this is not feasible or practical, follow the next best alternative of redesigning the pump-subsidy schemes à la UP's FBS."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2110751616.json b/main/part_2/2110751616.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a46c870e545bea67ded197500602868b4fb9247 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2110751616.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"05101b72d6dc4b1e1e80b84b8e24e6f0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2f45d8e1-a68b-4399-a1b1-dd91a7478fc8/retrieve","id":"205870581"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7b5c679d-6829-4613-8cb4-1af2c3b314ce","content":"Two individual field consultants -Balentine Oingo, Rachel Gitundu and Lutomia Cosmas for the Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT editing the report Marya Hillesland from Oxford UniversityEileen Bogweh Nchanji, Nadia Guettou Djurfeldt and Haley Carter Zaremba Access to clean, safe, and sufficient water is essential to human development and wellbeing. The importance of this imperative is recognized by the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs) number 6, 'Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all,' aiming to secure universal safely managed drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene services by 2030. However, achieving these targets will require a \"fourfold increase in the pace of progress,\" as billions around the world still lack these essential services (UN, 2022:38). Insecure or inadequate access to water and hygiene services has been exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic and climate change, and will continue to be challenged by climate change going forward.In Kenya, access to drinking water and sanitation is currently under extreme threat from the country's worst drought in 40 years, which has been greatly exacerbated in recent years due to four failed rainy seasons in a row ( UN News, 2022). In Kenya, 62% of the total population, and just 55% of the rural population, has access to improved drinking water sources (FAO 2015). What is more, only 34 percent of Kenyans have piped drinking water, according to the most recent census (KNBS, 2020). In addition to relying on rainfall for agriculture and raising livestock, many rural households must rely on unimproved water sources for household use, particularly during the dry season. In times of water scarcity, water access requires more effort and time, thereby reducing the time available for other activities. Issues of water access impact different social groups differently, particularly with respect to disability, age and gender. According to census data (ibid.), 385,417 Kenyans have disabilities related to mobility, and 333,520 have visual disabilities, which can make fetching water a much more challenging, if not impossible, task. This affects more woen as notably, more Kenyan women than men are disabled (523,883 versus 394,330, respectively).Gender differences within the household in terms of water access, water roles and responsibilities, and livelihoods means that men and women are impacted in different ways and to different degrees by water scarcity. In Kenya, as in other water-insecure contexts, women and girls tend to disproportionately carry the burden of fetching and managing water at the household level as part of the unpaid domestic work that they are socially assigned (Bukachi et al., 2021;FAO 2015;IFAD, 2022). Men only get involved in water fetching when they can sell it for income, or in rare cases for household use (FAO, 2015:14). Despite increased labor burdens and time deficits, women and girls have shown resilience in such circumstances, often leveraging social capital as a key coping strategy to secure water for their households (Bukachi et al., 2021). Considering the increasing pressures and uneven impact, there is an increasing need to understand how different social groups access and make decisions around water use and provisioning at both the household and community levels.R34819/CN159 Intrahousehold rights and decision-makingThe primary aim of this study is to explore what the local water sources are, how they are prioritized, how communities are coping with water scarcity, how water is locally governed and controlled, and how decision-making dynamics at the household as well as community levels impact the choice and use of improved and unimproved water sources, as well as the differentiated impacts these choices have on women and men. Rural households in Kenya must make a complex set of decisions around water source choices as they lack secure water access, particularly during the dry season. The study communities of Bomani and Kidzini North rely on multiple sources of water to choose from that are of different quality and reliability, with a large share of households relying on unimproved water sources, such as unprotected dams and water pans. Even these unimproved water sources become scarce in the dry season and in periods of prolonged drought. As such, this study seeks to understand what coping mechanisms are being used by community members when water and money run out. Qualitative analysis is used to examine what benefits and trade-offs are associated with these strategies, and how these benefits and trade-offs impact men and women differently due to socially prescribed gender roles. Wagner et al. (2019) argue that in order to develop and maintain adequate water supply infrastructure in rural Kenya, planners and policymakers must first understand the preferences of the households that will be using those water supplies. While data pertaining to water preferences in rural areas remains sparse, a number of studies have sought to shed light on such preferences and priorities at the household level (Basani, Isham, & Reilly, 2008;Cheesman, Bennett, & Son, 2008;Gross & Elshiewy, 2019;Madanat & Humplick, 1993;Mu, Whittington, & Briscoe, 1990;Nauges & Strand, 2007;Nauges & Van Den Berg, 2009;Wagner et al., 2019). There is still a missing gap on how household members negotiate access, use and control over water and this study fills this critical gap we will draw from qualitative data to explore how intrahousehold decision-making dynamics impact the choice of water sources across different scenarios.The analysis presented below is guided by four overarching questions:1. What are the different water sources and how are they prioritized and negotiated (e.g., what are the inclusion/exclusion criteria according to users)? 2. What are the coping mechanisms used by villagers when water and/or money runs out? 3. How is water governed? Who controls the water sources? 4. What are the intra-household dynamics pertaining to water, particularly with respect to bargaining power and gender norms? More specifically, who fetches the water? Who manages the water? Who owns the water assets and what are the negotiation and conflict dynamics between genders?Kenya is one the strongest economies in Sub-Saharan Africa according to statistics provided by the World Bank. Kenya's economy registered a 7.52% growth in 2021, up from 4.97% in 2015 and 5.11% in 2019 (World Bank, 2022). In 2020, the economy receded by -0.25% following the protracted effects of the coronavirus pandemic. It is projected to grow to 5. 7% and 5.3% in 20227% and 5.3% in and 20237% and 5.3% in , respectively (IMF, 2022)). However, the protracted war between Russia and Ukraine may dim Kenya's growth prospects. In particular, the effect of the conflict on fertilizer prices is expected to shrink Kenya's GDP growth in 2022 by 0.8% (Breisinger et al., 2022). The direct impact of high input prices is expected to result in 50% losses in agricultural GDP through disruptions in food production. This occurrence will push more people into poverty and food insecurity, as already, 8.9 million Kenyans live below $1.90 per day (Kamer, 2022).Approximately 72% of Kenya's 55 million people live in rural areas (World Bank, 2022a), and primarily depend on agriculture for their livelihoods. Agriculture, which is the mainstay activity of the rural population, accounts for about 22% of the national GDP and employs 54% of the people in the country. Smallholder farming (0.2-3 hectares) accounts for 75% of the total agricultural output and has the potential to lift millions of rural households out of poverty (Olwande et al., 2015). Agriculture employs 59% of the female population and 50% of males, suggesting the critical role played by the agricultural sector in the country (World Bank, 2022a).However, agricultural livelihoods are currently under threat from multiple reinforcing factors including climate change, conflict, a growing population, and insecure land tenure. At its current rate, Kenya's population is on track to double in the next 27 years. This growth is already putting pressure on natural resources, especially in areas with high agricultural potential (FAO, n.d.). A growing population also means that land is an increasingly scarce resource. Culturally and historically, land is owned by men and not women or youths; this customary norm is still prevalent despite policy measures forbidding discrimination in land ownership and access (Mwathane & Kapanya, 2018). In Kilifi County, where this study takes place, the land tenure system is complex, with more than 60 percent of residents lacking individual land titles. High levels of landlessness have contributed to high poverty levels in the county (KCIDP, 2013). The County Integrated Development Plan invested roughly USD $3 million towards creating structures, sensitization and platforms to provide residents with individual land titles between 2013 and 2017, but many residents -and women in particular -still lack secure land tenure. While women have a predominant role in subsistence agriculture, thanks in large part to the out-migration of men to urban areas, only 5 percent of the registered land in Kenya is registered to women (NEMA, 2010). With increased urbanization and land sales, land parcels are becoming smaller, and farmers are increasingly pushed onto more marginal lands.Agricultural systems in Kenya remain predominantly rain-fed, which further intensifies the vulnerability of rural livelihoods as the effects of climate change become more pronounced. Kenya is in the midst of its worst drought in 40 years ( UN News, 2022). Four successive failed rainy seasons have created extreme water stress in many communities in Kenya's arid and semi-arid lands (ASAL), which make up over 90% of the country's area, and are home to approximately 38 percent of the national population (IFAD, 2022). Long rains in central Kenya have been steadily declining since the 1970s, and are projected to continue their decline (FEWS NET, 2010). As a result, areas of agricultural production in Kenya are shrinking. Conflicts over natural resources have intensified in some areas, especially between farmers and pastoralists (FAO, n.d.), which are exacerbated by climatic changes such as drought.The impacts of land and water scarcity, as well as economic downturns, have unequal impacts on different social groups, with women, girls, and other marginalized communities experiencing greater and differentiated vulnerabilities. The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) gender equality rating for Kenya is 3.50 out of 6, meaning that the country has moderately performed in terms of installing institutions and programs that promote equal access to economic, educational, and health opportunities for men and women. Traditional and cultural beliefs in Kenya still impede achievement of gender parity in human development indicators. A report by the World Economic Forum indicates that while Kenya has made some progress in achieving gender parity, its performance between 2006 and 2021 is showing worrying trends (Amadala, 2019;Kivuva & Kinuthia, 2021). While the country's enrolment and completion rates of primary and secondary schools for boys and girls are almost similar, there are gender gaps in transition to higher education (Amadala, 2019;Akala, 2019).In addition, the rate of women's literacy in Kenya is significantly lower than that of men.Women are also underrepresented in high-paying jobs and women entrepreneurs struggle to access microcredit facilities (Kivuva & Kinuthia, 2021). The disparities exist despite gender mainstreaming legislation, policies and programs instituted in the last three decades, including the two-third gender role in the Constitution of Kenya and establishment of National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC). As a heterogeneous group, different Kenyan women have differential lived experiences, opportunities, and challenges according to their other intersecting identity factors (e.g., age, marital status, economic status, ethnic group, disability, etc.). Young women and adolescent girls, in particular, face acute and specific vulnerabilities, and are \"particularly vulnerable to poverty especially at the household and community level exacerbated by gender-based violence, harmful cultural attitudes, and beliefs\" (USAID, 2022).This work was carried out in Margarini and Kaloleni subcounties in Kilifi, specifically in Bomani and North Kidzini villages. These communities were selected based on the water scarcity and drought conditions in the county. Additionally, they were selected due to their mixed land tenure system, which opens up opportunities to access and use different private and communal water sources. Kilifi County is one of the ASAL counties of Kenya which face high levels of exposure and vulnerability to drought. The high levels of vulnerability in the country are in large part a product of historical under-development, particularly of public goods and services. Kilifi county has a bimodal rainfall pattern with average annual precipitation ranging from 300mm to 1,300mm. The coastal belt receives more rainfall than the hinterlands, with long rains used for agriculture and short rains to refill water spaces. The annual temperatures range between 21 to 30 degrees Celsius in the coastal belt, and 30 to 40 degrees in the hinterlands where most of the communities are located. The County of Government of Kilifi (2018) projected a three fold increase in water deficit from 2018 to 2030. This reality is felt strongly in most villages. Bomani is generally drier than Kidzini North, due to increased droughts over the past four years. In the past, most land used to be clan and family land, but at present individual land tilting is being promoted.For the qualitative study, data was collected using key informant interviews, focus group discussions and life histories. Multiple tools were used for triangulation and thick description to strengthen the credibility of the data and enable different interpretations and meanings to be included in data analysis. Using various qualitative tools also provided us with multiple realities and voices from the field that complement results from the quantitative data.We strived for equal gender representation when selecting participants in all the interviews. Socioeconomic and intersectional aspects were also considered during the selection of participants. We carried out a community profile in each village -Bomani and Kidzini North in Magarini and Kaloleni sub-county respectively with 2 men and 2 women. The FGDs were disaggregated by sex and age. A total of eight FGDs were conducted -1 young 1 woman, 1 young man, 1 woman, and 1 man, in each village. A total of 16 in-depth life history interviews were conducted with men and women from monogamous and single-headed households across the two villages. We strived to include extended and polygamous households, especially mothers-in-law, but none were available for the interviews due to varied reasons beyond our control.Community profiles were developed from key informant discussions with community leaders.The community profiles investigated the social, economic, agricultural, and political background information, available water sources, access, benefits, management and control by the community, government, and households. In addition, we were also interested in community-level factors that may contribute to changes in gender norms and capacities for exercising agency and innovating in water.Focus group discussions with men, women, young men and young women were carried out separately to map out different water sources in the community and to understand who is included/excluded from accessing, using, managing and controlling different sources within the community. We were also interested in how the above elements interact with the land on which the water is situated.Through life histories which are in-depth interviews, intrahousehold decision-making on water use, access, and benefits for men, women or youths were tackled. Life histories were also carried out to triangulate the key informant interviews and focus group discussions. It generally focused on intra-household decision-making and norms in relation to water within individual households.We selected two of the three sub-counties for the qualitative evaluation -Margarini and Kaloleni from a list containing roughly 17 villages from each sub-county, and we had to pick a village per sub-county. Our selection criteria were based on the availability of the community elder, accessibility and availability for the interviews. We targeted 4 elders (2 men and 2 women) across the villages for community profiling. For the FGDs, we had groups of 6 to 8 people in all categories. The participants for the community profile, life histories and FGDs were different to gain multiple discourses and realities from the villages. Table 1 below outlines the sample size for each module across the sub-counties. Total woman 4 4The findings presented are based on systematic content analysis of all data. In addition, the analysis benefitted from inductive hand-coding of the data on the key study topics of water sources and governance, intra-household decision-making and management, coping mechanisms, and gender roles to detect patterns. Figures were created with Lucidchart.Imprecise language due to the relaxed and conversational format of KIIs, FGDs, and life histories leave many data points somewhat subjective and open to interpretation. This was particularly true for discussions of different water sources, in which different sources were often conflated (e.g., water pans and dams) or non-specific (e.g., using the word 'taps' to refer to a number of sources under different management). Some information, and especially more nuanced meanings and subtexts, may have been lost in translation. Data was collected in Swahili, which may not be the first or preferred language for many of those interviewed; these transcripts were then translated into English.Each life history interview followed a similar flow, but each conversation played out differently and some questions were altered or omitted to fit the context, sometimes leading to incomparable results or missing details that would aid in the analysis. The benefit as well as the drawback of qualitative data collection and analysis is that it captures the perceptions and attitudes of participants, which are often contradictory, complex, and multiple. Such contradictions in the collected data are not a limitation, however, but an accurate reflection of the differential experiences, competing interests and disagreements at play in the study communities. As such, differences in perspectives are presented below as a meaningful finding rather than a methodological flaw.Finally, the authors recognize that issues of intersectionality are central to the differential lived experiences of women and men as heterogeneous groups. This study includes age and gender as important intersecting axes of identity which shape water access and differential experiences of water scarcity. However, other key factors including socioeconomic status and disability, among others, fell outside the scope of this study. These intersecting identities and their relation to issues of water access merit their own close examination in other empirical studies.Both localities involved in the study rely on a diverse array of water sources throughout the year (Table 2). Bomani and Kidzini North both rely on dams (a dug-out receptacle which fills seasonally), taps (which connect to municipal water sources), and water tanks owned by private individuals (either filled by rainwater harvesting or by a water tanker truck locally known as a water bowser), and the water bowsers themselves. Kidzini North has a number of additional water resources that Bomani does not have: water pans (a shallow dugout which is smaller than a dam), shallow wells (dug by villagers in dried river beds), and seasonal streams. In Bomani, unlike in Kidzini North, there is a well sunk at a private school which sells water, and there are boreholes available in neighboring villages, although the distance to these boreholes presents a challenge to villagers. The use and prioritization of these differing water sources depends on a variety of criteria, principally: availability, accessibility (in terms of affordability as well as distance), distance, and water quality (Table 3). Villagers in both Bomani and Kidzini North have to weigh these different criteria each time they decide where to source their waterThese decisions are often taken on a daily basis and are based on a complex combination of factors, exemplified by the decision tree in Figure 1. An additional element missing in the diagram is if you do not have a motorbike you can also rek to fetch water. This section presents the various benefits, tradeoffs, and challenges of each water source, the gendered implications of these benefits and trade-offs, and how these factors impact intra-household decision-making and the overall water stress and water resilience of the two communities. The dam tends to be the primary water resource for communities in both Bomani and Kidzini North, as it is a free and a public resource. Most of the community dams described in this study were dug in a previous generation and inherited by the community. For example, Bomani's Agina dam was dug in the late 1970s and early 1980s, according to a community profile interview with a Bomani community leader. This dam possesses its own title deed, which the chief carries. As community-owned and -maintained water sources, dams are usually the closest and most essential water source that a village has. However, in the dry season the dams are frequently dried out, causing villagers to look for other, often less desirable options. \"The dams are our resilience,\" explained a young Kidzini North man in FGDs. \"For example, now that the dams are dry, it's a time of suffering.\" Sometimes these dry periods can last more than a single season; in a Bomani FGD, men reported that their dam has been dry for four years due to drought, causing high levels of water stress in the community.In both Bomani and Kidzini North, dams are governed by elders, and overseen by committees which are selected by the community itself, often on a volunteer basis. In both localities, these committees are made up of both men and women in approximately equal numbers. Committee members can include a wide range of ages, from youth to the elderly. These committees are tasked with enforcing rules for dam use, which include: no stepping in the dam water by humans or livestock, collecting water using a scoop to avoid stepping in the water, and no small children allowed in or near the dam for fear of contamination as well as risk of drowning. These rules are enforced by committee members or elders taking shifts watching over the dam, with fines enforced for those who violate the rules. Terms generally last one year, at which point these committee members can be reelected. If the committee members are perceived not to be doing their job properly they can be replaced at any time. Also, community activities are often organized around cleaning the dam, and any family that does not participate can be fined.While the dam is a vital lifeline for the community, as it is a free and public resource, it also presents certain tradeoffs. Even in the rainy season, the dams can face problems with reliability and maintenance. In Kidzini North, for example, young men expressed in FGDs that the local dam is poorly constructed, frequently bursting and filling with sand. In time periods when the water levels are particularly low in the dams, these young men also described instances where the village elders overseeing the dam may charge money for dam water to encourage rationing, or require those who fetch water from the dam to exchange labor for water, by helping to dig out sand for dam maintenance. In some cases, outside entities have tried to get involved with building new dams to bolster local water resilience, but according to community profile interviews, these interventions have been largely unsuccessful. One community leader from Kidzini North described an instance in which a global evangelical Christian humanitarian aid organization, dug a dam in the community but did not choose a suitable location, so the dam never filled with water. Another community leader from Bomani described another dam built by another aid organization which only benefits the 20% of the community that was included in the project, and still another dam dug by the government, which community members are not allowed to do maintenance on themselves, leaving the dam in poor condition.In addition to these challenges, sanitation of dam water can be a major issue. While communities in both Bomani and Kidzini North have rules about how dam water can be used and accessed for the purpose of keeping the water clean, enforcement is uneven, and the water can become extremely dirty or unsafe to drink or cook with. Many villagers, especially the poorest, or those who can't make longer journeys due to age or disability, use this water regardless. As one Kidzini North woman explained in her life history, sometimes she's too tired to go fetch clean water, so she opts for the dirty water which is nearer; \"you weigh your options.\" Furthermore, although almost all interviewees were aware of water sanitation methods, many men and women expressed in life histories and focus group discussions that there are many instances in which people will drink and otherwise use untreated water. Reasons for this can include: they can't afford purification tablets, they can't afford the time to boil the water and wait for it to cool back down, or they are simply too tired after the exertion of getting the water itself, and therefore choose to drink it as it is.Presenting another trade-off, sourcing water from the dam can disproportionately increase labor burdens on women. Since most dams are relatively close to the communities, women are expected to fetch water from the dam as a part of their day-to-day unpaid domestic work. Typically this is done on foot, with women carrying a 20-liter jerrycan of water back to their home. As such, women can only carry limited amounts of water at a time, and may need to make several trips per day. As one man in a Bomani FGD explained, \"When there is water at the dam we [men] get to rest, because it is mostly fetched by the women.\" Young women in Bomani agreed that the responsibility of water almost always falls to women, and especially when dam water is available, expressing that men are only involved in fetching water when money is a factor.Water pans, found in Kidzini North, function much like smaller dams and are usually used as a backup when communal dams are dry or otherwise compromised. While they are dug in individuals' land upon agreement with the landowner, they are treated as shared resources to varying degrees. Depending on the management of the water pan, these resources can either be free to the community or sold to individuals, while those community members who helped to dig out the water pan are allowed to fetch water there for free. Water pans, too, can be particularly dirty, especially when they reach low water levels. Young women in a Kidzini North FGD expressed that the water pan in their area is so dirty that the water can't even be used to wash clothing. Water pans are also used as an important water source for farming, especially when the rains are scarce.There are two kinds of taps available in both Bomani and Kidzini North: public utility-run taps which sell water relatively inexpensively at roadside kiosks (approximately 5-10 shillings per 20-liter jerrycan), and private taps. These private taps are set up by individuals with the means to have water piped into their homes, or by groups who collectively set up a water kiosk as a small business venture. The water for privately owned taps (by individuals or groups) is metered by a local water utility, and owners collect money from sales to then pay the utility. Interviewees reported that this water generally costs around 30 shillings per 20-liter jerrycan. In the region around Bomani and Kidzini North, this water is sourced from boreholes.In villages surrounding Bomani, pipes from the boreholes leading to public roadside kiosks were laid by the Australian government, and are now overseen by the county government. The pipes do not reach Bomani, but efforts have been made to extend them. Community leaders expressed that an international NGO set up kiosks in the area several years ago, but the project is not yet complete.Water from the taps tends to be some of the cleanest water available, but distance, time, and cost are a major determining factor for whether this is a good option for households. As a woman from Kidzini North explained in her life history, taps in her area can run out of water early in the day, requiring her to leave the house at 6am to get a place in the queue. Because of the distance and the time constraints, most households that live far from functioning taps send a young man (either within the family or a hired rider) by motorbike to fetch water. Those who can reach the taps by motorbike (i.e., young men) usually fare better in terms of time and effort expended, but still face major time deficits and opportunity costs when the queues are long. According to FDGs, young men have to prioritize their own household's water needs before they are able to collect water for others for profit, or go out in pursuit of other income-earning opportunities. As one young man from Bomani expressed, \"I prioritized getting water but I lost a job and so I sleep hungry and wait to try tomorrow. That is how it affects us.\" On the other hand, taps can provide income-earning opportunities to women; according to men in the Kidzini North FGD, most of the groups running collective for-profit water kiosks are women's groups.Water sources that are farther away, such as taps, also carry major safety and security risks for those fetching water, and especially for women. Walking long distances to fetch water usually entails crossing through long uninhabited stretches where walkers (i.e., women and girls) are especially vulnerable. Women and girls have been attacked and sexually assaulted along the road to fetch water, even during daylight hours, and some men have been killed. As such, community members, and especially women and girls, are discouraged from fetching water in the evening.The villages on either side of Bomani have access to water piped from nearby boreholes. However, Bomani itself has no directly piped water. After years of regional drought, which has caused the dams to dry out year-round, most villagers in Bomani have to go to surrounding villages to access any kind of water. \"We are on an island here in Bomani,\" expressed one young man in an FGD. According to data from community profiles, villagers in Bomani primarily rely on a borehole in Kazandani, which is 2 to 4 hours walk, constructed by the Magharibi settlement scheme around 1978. The borehole is a public amenity overseen by a committee elected by the community in Kazandani, and possesses its own title deed declaring the land it occupies to belong to the borehole itself.The boreholes around Bomani function as an important source of clean water, especially during the dry season, but can also be unreliable. The motorized pumps that draw the water out of the ground can break down, causing interruptions to water supply for hours, days, or weeks. Moreover, the taps closest to Bomani (which are far nearer and more accessible than the boreholes themselves) draw their water from the boreholes. Not only does this mean that the taps fail when the borehole fails, it also means that the taps slow to a trickle or stop working altogether when the water levels at the borehole are low. In these instances, villagers must sacrifice much more time queuing to fill their cans with slow, low-flow taps, or travel much further to fetch water from the borehole directly.In addition to boreholes, Bomani also has one well, which serves as the only year-round water source located within the village according to FGDs. This well is the property of a private school. Bomani villagers are able to buy water from the school, but it is particularly expensive, costing double what the private taps charge and quadruple what the borehole charges directly according to the young women in Bomani FGDs.Tanks and bowsers provide essential backup services to communities where core water sources (e.g., dams, water pans, and taps) have run dry or are prohibitively far away. Tanks are privately owned, typically by fellow villagers with the means to purchase such a vessel as well as the funds to pay water bowsers to fill it periodically (an expense of approximately 8,000 shillings). Some tank owners also fill their tanks with collected rainwater when possible, but eventually have to refill them with bowser water when harvested water runs out in the dry season. While harvested water itself is free, not all villagers are able to harvest water in sufficient quantities to support resilience in the dry months. Harvesting rainwater in meaningful quantities not only requires adequate storage assets, it also requires metal roofs and gutters. These assets are out of reach for many villagers, who frequently live in mud huts with thatched roofs.Once tanks are filled, either by rainwater harvesting or from the water bowser, usage differs between households. Some individuals keep this tank-stored water for themselves, especially if they have water-intensive livelihoods such as raising livestock at a larger scale. Others sell this water for profit, or to help the community when other water resources are lacking. While privately owned tanks are often the closest options for villagers, as they are located in neighbors' houses or compounds, they tend to be among the most expensive water sources, even when water-selling is carried out altruistically rather than for profit. One villager from Kidzini North with one such private tank explained in his life history that he breaks even selling his water for 25 shillings per 20-liter jerrycan, a higher price than other local options (i.e., dams and taps). As water scarcity has put an increasing economic squeeze on the village, he explained, his neighbors have stopped buying from him and have had to resort to collecting dirty dam water instead.In both Bomani and Kidzini North, villagers in FGDs reported that in rare circumstances, when local water availability is particularly dire, water bowsers can be sent to the communities to sell water directly from the truck to villagers with jerrycans. Young men in Bomani report that this can be sent by individuals with means to create such an arrangement for resale. Men in Kidzini North report that they make such an arrangement themselves, by visiting the local water treatment plant and pleading their case.Shallow wells and seasonal streams are used in Kidzini North exclusively as a supplemental source of water, as they are not reliably potable or consistently available. These shallow wells are dug in the middle of an empty riverbed or in typically wet or marshy areas before these natural water sources dry out completely. However, these wells often turn out to be salty. As such, many villagers express that they may decline to help their neighbors dig such a well, as it is a gamble that is often not worth the effort. Others contend that even if the water is salty, it still has uses in applications where it is not consumed, such as for washing clothes.Insufficient regional water infrastructure in the two study communities, along with prolonged and intensifying periods of drought, have resulted in a complex system of overlapping official and unofficial water governance in both Bomani and Kidzini North (Figure 2). In most cases, for villagers without significant assets, public or \"god-given\" water that is available to be harvested or fetched for free by the end user (i.e., dams, rainwater) is the first choice for water provisioning. For those villagers who do have adequate wealth or assets to weigh water safety and convenience over cost, government-or utility-provisioned water is often the first choice. It is when these sources fail, are too far away, or are impacted by issues around water quality or sanitation, that users seek out other, secondary water sources. The demand for these secondary sources has created a cottage industry for villagers with consistent access to water and/or water-fetching means such as motorbikes. These systems of secondary water provisioning involve (sometimes multiple) middlemen, which can serve as both a failsafe against snags in the supply chain and as an obfuscation of where and who water is really coming from.There are many examples of such confusion over the specifics of water governance and provenance; discussion of water governance in FGDs was frequently characterized by disagreement or contradiction as to which water sources were owned and governed by whom. This leaves villagers with few options for recourse when public water sources such as boreholes fail, as they may not know who to bring their grievances to.Understandably, villagers showed the greatest comprehension concerning the governance of locally controlled water resources, such as dams and water pans. In FGDs, villagers of all ages and genders were able to explain the process of dam oversight, committee elections, and even name committee members with clarity and specificity. The greatest degree of confusion surrounding water governance and management was related to the management of boreholes, and kiosks reselling borehole water in Bomani. The involvement of many different actors has created confusion as well as tensions concerning water use and management. These actors include the county government as well as foreign governments, NGOs, a water utility called the Malindi Water and Sanitation Company (MAWASCO) -an agency contracted by the government to supply potable water, and local village committees and elders. Furthermore, different boreholes are reportedly owned by separate entities and governed distinctly. Older men seemed to have the most knowledge of water management and governance in Bomani when questions moved beyond dam governance, which all community members were familiar with. While women and youth were vague or silent in response to specific questions about who controls and manages boreholes and associated water kiosks in FGDs, men provided more complete, if conflicting answers.In FGDs, Bomani men said MAWASCO has taken control of a local water tank provided by an international NGO to store pumped borehole water, and is reselling the water to locals. While water prices are supposed to be set by the Water Act, in FGDs it was said that \"MAWASCO increased the prices of water from 2 shillings to 5 shillings for every twenty litres of water. Before MAWASCO, the water community committee used to collect the money and give it to the treasurer and then when there was a maintenance issue at the borehole, we were the ones to repair it [by calling the mechanic]. But since MAWASCO took over they are in charge of all the decision-making and repairing whatever needs to be repaired. The money collected goes to MAWASCO, because there is a meter that shows the amount of water used and they will know the money that is collected. The money is for doing the repair, maintenance and paying for the mechanic.\" (Bomani men FGD) Some men were grateful to MAWASCO for connecting the tank to the water source, while others were resentful of the arrangement, as exemplified by the following statement:\"MAWASCO has started mistreating us, they collect money from us and they don't pay for the fuel so that the water can be pumped on time. The water might not come for two to three weeks, when we ask, we are told the fuel has not been paid for. We cannot chase them away because they have said they are the owners of the water but we do suffer. If there is another way, we would like to chase them away.\" (Bomani men FGD)In times of extreme water scarcity, community members in Bomani and Kidzini North are forced to venture further and further away to find (increasingly expensive) water, which incurs both financial costs and opportunity costs due to large and sometimes unpredictable time commitments. As one young Kidzini North man explained, \"When there is no water, it forces you to wake up at 3am to start looking for water, yet you don't even know where you will find it.\" (Kidzini North young men FGD)As such, many villagers described having to forgo entire work days in order to search for water. In times of water scarcity, water fetching directly conflicts with working hours as it is an almost exclusively daytime activity; some men describe fetching water by moonlight, but for women this is not an option due to safety issues. What is more, many forms of earning income (such as construction work in the case of men and cooking foods to sell in the case of women) also rely on water availability, forcing people to change their livelihood activities or travel farther away to earn income. In Kidzini North, men report going to town to find work such as breaking rocks to sell so they can buy water, while women report pivoting away from income-earning tasks that require water to those that don't, such as processing and selling omeni (dried fish). Others have resorted to illegal charcoal production, which has been banned in the area due to its contribution to deforestation, or to hazardous or suboptimal occupations, such as working at the salt mines in Bomani.In spite of these strategies, there are also times when both water and money run out completely. Communities in Bomani and Kidzini North both identified a number of coping strategies when faced with such a situation. These strategies fall into the following categories: rationing, borrowing, bargaining, begging, and sacrificing (Table 4). Organized by category, these coping mechanisms, as well as their gender dimensions, are detailed in the following subsections. The first and primary response to acute water shortage is to ration the amount of water that is used, and the things it is used for. Generally speaking, families try to stretch their water to go farther in all applications, trying to use one jerrycan of water where two were used before.Rationing was expressed to be particularly important and severe in relation to waterintensive agricultural activities. Participants described giving their livestock half the water they normally give them, letting their livestock go two days without any water, and reducing the number of livestock they have to feed and water by selling them, or in some cases through the death of the livestock. This can bear particularly negative consequences for pastoralists as well people relying on dairy production for their livelihoods. In addition, watering home gardens seemed to be of particularly low priority, with many participants laughing at the suggestion of using hard-won water on plants.As a result, growing food is one of the first activities to be abandoned when water runs low.However, this creates a problem when money, too, runs low, often as a result of water-related expenditures. \"If you don't have money you go hungry,\" explained a young Bomani woman in FGDs.Bathing less and washing clothes less frequently was also mentioned by all genders in both regions. One man in Kidzini North expressed in FGDs that when there is no water to fully bathe, they limit bathing to washing just the face, hands, and feet. While this is a common response to water shortage, participants of all genders expressed that there are major drawbacks and trade-offs associated with rationing bathing water for themselves and for their children. FGD participants suggested that children might be kept home from school if they are unable to bathe or have clean clothes. Similarly, young men in Kidzini North explained that limiting bathing to once a week lowers self-esteem as well as income-earning opportunities:\"It's just about cleanliness because it reaches a point where you lack water to an extent that you feel ashamed of yourself. For example, as a motorbike rider, if you notice that you are smelling, you even wonder how you will carry people on a motorbike. So you will find that you don't have that morale. You isolate [yourself] instead of being active and doing work.\"Young women also expressed that lack of bathing weighs heavily on their morale, as well as on their identity as women:\"Cleanliness is important for women, everyone needs water but as women being clean is important for us, for our children, our houses.\" (Kidzini North young women FGD)Rationing water for bathing can also have serious health consequences, resulting in skin infections (particularly for children). Some FDGs also attributed Covid-19 deaths and the spread of cholera to lack of water for bathing, handwashing, and personal sanitation and hygiene in general.In times of water stress, it is common for villagers to borrow water from their neighbors to be repaid at a later date (usually one 20-liter jerrycan at a time). Most interviewees in life histories and FGDs described this practice as part of being neighborly, and helping one another out in times of hardship. As one young man from Kidzini North explained, \"I go to my friend because I know he has water, so I ask for help because I know next time, I will be the one offering help.\" There are times, however, when water trading practices can lead to conflict if the borrower is slow or unable to return the favor. Young women from Bomani described instances in which neighbors stopped talking to each other over such an issue, or had to bring the disagreement to the village chief for resolution. While water trading practices are widespread, they differ between gender groups and age groups. Young men, young women, and older women all reported regular borrowing and loaning of water as common practice, while older men seemed to be removed from this type of interchange. When asked about water borrowing, older men in a Kidzini North group responded: \"We don't know, maybe it is a secret between the women.\" This feminized characterization of water trading is in line with Bukachi et al.'s (2021) study in Rural Kenya which found that women, lacking other forms of capital, are able to leverage their social capital for household water access and resilience.Borrowed water is almost always repaid in water (and reportedly never in cash) but there are also other forms of water exchange, while uncommon. Young men in Bomani described trading goods and services in exchange for water or water provisioning. For example, one young man said that he will offer to fetch water on his motorbike for a neighbor if they collect firewood for him, or give him chicken. Some groups also described giving water to other, less fortunate community members out of charity, particularly with respect to elderly and disabled villagers:\"If a person cannot access water at all, as a youth or let me say personally, I will take two of my jerry cans and assist this person, without hoping for a return. I will know I have helped this person because I know his condition is not good.\" (Bomani young men FGD)In cases where water can't be borrowed from other community members, villagers have to resort to trying to buy water on credit. This is not always successful, however, particularly for individuals who have had trouble repaying credits in the past. According to the women's FGD in Kidzini North, access to water on credit is gendered. They say that only women can persuade owners of tanks to give them water on credit, as men are perceived as less likely to pay it back. These women also express that it is difficult to get money from their husbands to pay back the loans that the women have secured, saying they have to sneak around to repay the credit or lie about what the money is being used for. Conversely, only men reported going directly to the water treatment plant to plead for a water bowser to be sent to the community in times of extreme water scarcity. While this is reportedly a very rare occurrence, it has happened in the past. According to a woman community leader in Kidzini North, a water bowser was donated to the community last year in one such instance.In Bomani, the community has held meetings in which they agreed to reach out to different aid organizations and projects to ask for their help to relieve the water stress in their community. In a community profile interview, a Bomani village elder and community officer expressed that while the community has reached out to a number of such organizations, theyhave not yet received any response.These coping mechanisms show that both study communities rely in large part on collective action and cooperation for communal resilience in the face of water scarcity. As one Bomani community leader said in his community profile interview, \"People facing hardship must always co-exist so that it is easier for them to find solutions.\" The different ways in which men, women, young men, and young women report using borrowing, bargaining, and begging practices to ensure household water security suggest that while both men and women rely on collectivity for water resilience, the form this collective action takes is highly gendered.Women tend to exchange water for water in a one-to-one trade, while young men are more likely to barter or trade motorbikes, which affords them income-earning opportunities in addition to water provisioning for their own household.\"When there is no water, we can eat one meal in a day. You wake in the morning to go find some water and when you come back it is late [...]. You can't do laundry. A lot of things come to a halt. You can't even bathe. Just problems. Even the livestock die.Lack of money and lack of water feed into each other in a vicious cycle. As free sources of water (i.e., dams) dry up, villagers are forced to spend more and more money and time finding enough water for basic needs. This, in turn, means there is less money to be spent on other essentials and less time to earn income, ultimately diminishing savings and income, and leaving people in dire situations. Bomani women explained in FGDs that they have had to halt their table banking scheme during the current period of water scarcity, as no one has cash to contribute, thereby eliminating an important source of financial stability for local women. As water is the most fundamentally important resource a household can have, households are forced to sacrifice other financial priorities, such as paying children's school fees or even buying and/or preparing food. Instead, they must expend everything they can on water provisioning. Without money to buy clean water, many villagers also resort to using and consuming dirty, unsafe, or salty water. In the words of one young Bomani man, \"they just depend on God to protect them.\"On top of significant financial sacrifices, villagers must sacrifice time in periods of extreme water stress, resulting in significant opportunity costs. Young men report sacrificing time they could be spending at work or in school in order to instead spend the day looking for water, potentially in vain. Children, too, have less time and energy for their studies, as they are expected to help fetch water, and may suffer dehydration. For those that still go to school or work, dehydration and preoccupation over lack of water limits their ability to fully engage in these activities. As one college student in the Kidzini North young men FGD describes: \"[if] I lack water, I will be mentally unstable.\" Another Bomani man expressed that performing manual labor is impossible without any water.Others have moved away from their communities entirely due to lack of water, emigrating to other regions of Kenya with better water availability and economic opportunities, or even migrating to other countries. While this is true for both men and women, it is not uncommon for men to emigrate and leave their wives behind to live in their mother-in-law's compound while their husbands work in urban centers.Norms surrounding water use and management are extremely gendered at the household level in both Bomani and Kidzini North. Water provisioning, monitoring, and management is treated as part of day-to-day domestic work, which makes it women's responsibility according to local gender roles. In addition to being the primary water fetchers, women are also the chief users of water in the home, as they are responsible for cooking, cleaning, washing clothes, bathing children, etc. This means that they are also the primary knowledgeholders in terms of how much water is used, needed, and kept at home. Men, meanwhile, are primarily responsible for providing money to buy water when suitable water is not freely available, although women also contribute money to water provisioning.While FGDs gave insight into pervading social norms and prescribed gender roles pertaining to water, life histories gave a more nuanced view into the diverse ways that water is managed in practice in different homes and different household structures (Table 5). Notably, there was a major difference between households in Bomani versus households in Kidzini North concerning which household member decides where water is sourced. With the exception of those from single-headed households, all life history participants in Kidzini North reported that men (husbands or sons) have the final say in where water is sourced from. In Bomani, responses were mixed, with about half of respondents reporting that the wife has the final say. This may reflect differences in social norms between the two regions, with more patriarchal approaches to intra-household decision-making appearing to preside in Kidzini North. Alternatively, the forced flexibility of gender roles under extreme water stress (detailed below) could also account for women's higher influence decision-making in Bomani, where water is more scarce than in Kidzini North. Similarly, Bomani residents were more likely to report that women own the jerrycans, whereas in Kidzini North husbands are viewed as the owners of such assets, even though it is their wives who use them on a daily basis. When it comes to decision-making concerning how household water is used, all participants were in agreement that the wife is in charge. Similarly, almost all life histories suggested that women were solely responsible for fetching water and making sure that there is water in the household.In the rainy season or when water is otherwise abundant, data suggests that these gender roles are clear-cut and stable. In times of water scarcity, however, gender norms concerning water management and provisioning become more fluid as family members of all genders and ages become increasingly involved in water provisioning.\"Sometimes [water scarcity] forces us to distribute roles because as men, we mostly let our wives go for water. So it reaches a point where the water that we depend on that is nearer has dried up so it forces you to take responsibilities as a man so that the wife remains at home to do other household chores as you go look for water and bring it to the house.\" (Kidzini North young men FGD) Men's increased involvement in water provisioning does not take the same form as women's however. , Men tend to get involved in water provisioning only once money or transport is involved. Cultural norms in both areas dictate that women do not ride motorbikes or bicycles, and rarely -if ever -ride donkeys, meaning that when households are forced to travel long distances to find water, men must necessarily get involved either by providing money to send for water, or by using one of these modes of transport to gather water themselves. Furthermore, this shifts the burden of water fetching increasingly onto young men, as opposed to older men, as younger men have more access to motorbikes, as well as knowledge of how to use them. While this may increase young men's labor burdens, it also provides them with income-earning opportunities, as water-fetching by motorcycle has become a cottage industry, especially during the dry season.While young men report high levels of involvement and feelings of responsibility concerning making sure there is water in the household, young women say that they themselves still bear the majority of time and labor burdens for water provisioning, and are therefore the most impacted by water shortage. As one young Kidzini woman expressed: \"We do everything.\" As women are solely responsible for domestic work, they explain that they are the only household members with knowledge of how much water is needed and when, whereas young men \"do not care\" and \"have to be asked\" to go fetch water.Importantly, while gender norms are adapted or stretched during times of water scarcity, this does not necessarily mean that there is gender transformation occurring or long-term gains in gender equality being made. While men are increasingly getting involved in water provisioning, these tasks are still viewed as women's work, and men report being teased, feeling demeaned, or being told that they are being controlled or \"bewitched\" by their wives when they are seen fetching water. Due to these cultural norms and social taboos, women are still the de facto water fetchers. As one Bomani woman explained: \"It's easier for the woman to fetch water because men find it difficult. They feel demeaned, especially in front of their children, so it's just easier for the woman to go.\" (Bomani women FGD)Furthermore, men's involvement is limited to more convenient forms of provisioning, while women must continue to fetch water by foot, meaning their drudgery is not necessarily decreased. Rather, regardless of young men's increased involvement, women's drudgery is often only increased in times of water stress as women are forced to walk further and further to find water, and often multiple times a day as they can only carry one jerrycan at a time. Not only is it considered 'demeaning' for men to be seen fetching water on foot, they are also quick to dismiss this option for its inefficiency and difficulty, as shown in these quotes from mens' discussion groups:\"Truthfully speaking you can cry when going to fetch water on foot.\" (Bomani men FGD)\"If someone goes on foot, you will take a longer time because you will be coming while resting on the way. Am not lying, you can come back with a half-full container because you were coming while drinking. If you go on foot, you might take like four hours.\" (Kidzini North young men FGD)Women, however, have no option but to go on foot, expending valuable time and energy for an amount of water that is not sufficient for their needs. In most cases, this requires leaving for water at or before dawn so women can be home in time to get their children ready for school.Severe water stress in Bomani and Kidzini North has led to the ad hoc development of a complex system of water provisioning, management, and governance featuring a diversity of water sources and actors. On the one hand, this complex system of providers, sources, and resellers produces some confusion locally about water provisioning, control, and oversight which limits villagers agency and avenues for recourse; on the other hand, the system's redundancies have created pockets of resilience in the face of insecure and often unpredictable water availability. The decreased availability of free and easily accessible water has led to the development of a cottage industry around water selling provisioning. However, the benefits from these increased income-earning opportunities are skewed toward young men with access to motorbikes, and wealthier community members who own tanks which afford them the luxury of having excess water to sell.Women have proven to be key actors in terms of household and community-level water security and resilience, but this resilience comes at a cost. Villagers have developed many overlapping coping mechanisms to survive dry periods, but these strategies present serious trade-offs which carry gendered implications, with women often losing out in terms of increased labor burdens and decreased economic opportunities. These time and labor burdens will likely be exacerbated by continued and intensifying water stress related to climate change, as well as the continued migration of men away from rural areas to urban areas. In periods of extreme water stress, gender roles related to intra-household water provisioning become flexible, but this malleability has not led to increased levels of gender equality. However, this seasonal flexibility in otherwise rigid social rules could serve as an entry point for future interventions to foment gender transformation in water use and management, as well as in the community at large."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2117714812.json b/main/part_2/2117714812.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b890de4b26ae43339a036a1a3eaf7642235c4f64 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2117714812.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3e76fe57cc4aefa2c1b2cc8298c57f48","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/993dedc9-c81d-4601-9006-b0c3b6a3451e/retrieve","id":"1868999010"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3420fb57-f5d3-4603-8340-ff9ab648814c","content":"Relationships between AE-I and IA Data, Scope, Collection Methods, and Techniques of Analysis Agroecology Initiative (AE-I): Third-year outcome and work packages From innovations to outcomes and impacts Limitations and opportunities for improvement MELIA BasicsAgroecological principles are applied by farmers across a wide range of contexts and are supported by other food system actorsAgroecology evidence-based assessment (WP2)Co-creation of innovations in Agroecological Living Landscapes (WP1)Countries where the initiative will be implemented: Peru, Tunisia, Zimbabwe, Kenya, India, Lao PDR, Burkina FasoInclusive business models with a focus on agroecological principles (WP3) The AE-I will deliver outcomes the third year of implementation, and these outcomes will be translated into impacts in the next years.The Impact Assessment Strategy (IA) will focus on evaluate the changes produced by the AE-I over their implementation and to provide the baseline to evaluate long-term impacts.The IA does not rely on a one-size-fits-all approach, so we start from a general methodology which will have different emphases depending on the transition pathways, agroecological principles, and its co-created interventions.The IA will help to understand the causal mechanisms of how the co-creating innovations led to the achievement of the outcomes in different contexts.Co-creating FSAMulti-level Perspective National, regional and local governments, ministries, and NARES.Farmers organizations, privatesector, NGO, NARES, consumers, researchers, investors, extension services, and other FSA.What is the contribution of the AE-I in stimulating policy changes that have created an enabling environment for innovation and improvement of agroecological principles?1.How does the initiative contribute to the development or improvement of organizational capabilities for innovation development?1.What are the effects of the AE-I on the agroecological principles of farming households?1.2. What are the processes that led to these changes?Unit Scope Data Sources Techniques Topic modeling will allow us to identify the main topics that represent the set of rural/agricultural policies in a country, as well as to see if and how agroecology-related topics are introduced and during the implementation of the AE-I and the contribution of the AE-I in stimulating agroecology topics at the policy level.Through Outcome evidencing and Innovation histories we seek to understand whether, how, and why the AE-I works. We will provide evidence of how different WPs work, for whom, in different contexts. This will be carried out by identifying the trajectories that led to the achievement of the outcomes in three case studies.Quantitative impact assessment will allow us to know the effects of the AE-I on the agroecological principles on farming households."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2120511354.json b/main/part_2/2120511354.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43e945e15a51893f6611c424fc3c749f00b8890d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2120511354.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"20fa036a60581766164a6ef6ca6ae720","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e47787a6-9b6c-435f-8e37-a101952d78bb/retrieve","id":"1329931091"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"218efe07-8048-41f8-9f74-9df20be1bf34","content":"Funding for the research carried out in this report was provided by the following organizations, among others, through the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF). UK Department for International Development (DFID) European Commission International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of DFID, European Commission, IFAD and SDC.The publications in this series cover a wide range of subjects-from computer modeling to experience with water user associations-and vary in content from directly applicable research to more basic studies, on which applied work ultimately depends. Some research reports are narrowly focused, analytical and detailed empirical studies; others are wide-ranging and synthetic overviews of generic problems.Although most of the reports are published by IWMI staff and their collaborators, we welcome contributions from others. Each report is reviewed internally by IWMI staff, and by external reviewers. The reports are published and distributed both in hard copy and electronically (www.iwmi.org) and where possible all data and analyses will be available as separate downloadable files. Reports may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgment.IWMI's mission is to provide evidence-based solutions to sustainably manage water and land resources for food security, people's livelihoods and the environment. IWMI works in partnership with governments, civil society and the private sector to develop scalable agricultural water management solutions that have a tangible impact on poverty reduction, food security and ecosystem health.The widespread use of motorized pumps has revolutionized irrigated agriculture in many parts of Asia by increasing productivity and reducing rural poverty. A similar pump revolution has begun more recently in sub-Saharan Africa. To date, the focus of both policy and research in Africa has been on facilitating supply chains to make pumps available at a reasonable price. In Asia, there is rising concern that mining of groundwater is threatening the continued viability of pumpbased irrigation. This has led to policy changes in some places. In Africa, pump irrigation is mainly based on two sources: (a) shallow groundwater aquifers, and (b) small streams and rivers. Both these sources usually have limited and variable water yields. We present a case study from Ethiopia where pump irrigation based on small rivers and streams is expanding rapidly. We show that, while farmers understand the social nature of community-managed irrigation, they share with policymakers a narrow understanding of pump irrigation as being primarily 'technical'. They perceive pumps as liberating them from the 'social' limitations of traditional communal irrigation. However, the rapid expansion of pump irrigation is leading to increasing competition and conflict over limited water resources. This report analyzes the wider implications for Africa of this blindness to the social dimension of pump irrigation, and offers suggestions for future policy and applied research to address the problem before it becomes a widespread crisis.Governments and their development partners have been investing in community-managed smallscale irrigation for decades. These investments usually involve either rehabilitating existing farmer-managed irrigation schemes or supporting the construction of new schemes, which farmers are expected to manage after completion. In the early years, these investments were largely in the construction of infrastructure, with little attention being given to ensuring that the institutional capacity will be in place to manage the irrigation schemes. However, governments and their partners learned a critical lesson that informs most such investments today: the social and institutional context and framework, including resource governance, are no less important than the hardware or infrastructure, if the scheme is going to be productive, profitable and sustainable.In the past few decades, an 'irrigation revolution' has led to large numbers of farmers investing in small motorized pumps in Asia and, more recently, in Africa. There are no reliable figures, but the scale of this change is millions of farmers in each of the large Asian countries, and many thousands (even hundreds of thousands) in some African countries, as summarized by de Fraiture and Giordano (2014). These pumps have enabled smallholders to diversify their farming systems, mitigate the impacts of rainfall variability, and grow high-value crops for urban and international markets. The benefits have contributed to a 'snowball' effect -neighboring farmers see the potential and also invest in pumps. Pump irrigation now dominates the irrigation scene in South Asia and North China, accounting for over 60% of irrigation in South Asia, for example (Mukherji et al. 2009). It also constitutes the fastest growing irrigation sector in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) (Burney and Naylor 2012;Giordano and de Fraiture 2014). However, the social and institutional context and framework for governing pump irrigation has been largely ignored, especially in SSA. This is leading to growing competition for scarce water supplies, conflicts among farmers, and mining of small rivers, streams and aquifers.While agreeing that this growth in private pump-based irrigation is a welcome development in SSA, we argue that sustainable private pumpbased irrigated agriculture requires no less social cooperation and collective action than community-managed irrigation. However, the kind of cooperation required for pump irrigation is more complex and less amenable to direct government support. The necessity of cooperation -the incentive to cooperate -for the management of community-managed schemes is relatively clear: if farmers fail to work together to maintain their scheme and share water, they will all be harmed as no one will receive water. However, in the case of multiple farmers using their own pumps to extract water from an 'invisible' aquifer or a river, the incentive itself is invisible: each farmer will respond to growing shortages by increasing his or her rate of pumping (or digging deeper, chasing the aquifer), in a vicious cycle reminiscent of the 'tragedy of the commons' paradigm. Yet, such a trajectory may not necessarily be the result of a lack of capacity for collective action. It may occur even in a situation where local people already have effective social cooperation and coordination arrangements for managing shared natural resources, including the use and management of traditional irrigation. This calls for understanding whether there are ways to facilitate local people to build on their social cooperation traditions to manage the negative outcomes (externalities) of the expansion of motor pump irrigation, or whether there are other arrangements that can facilitate sustainable motor pump irrigation.The skewed technological orientation among most actors regarding the conception, planning, diffusion and implementation of motor pump irrigation exacerbates the problem. In particular, studies and investment programs of policymakers and development agencies increasingly focus on developing the 'value chain' needed for a sustainable and successful pump-based irrigation economy, i.e., provision of low-cost pumps, spare parts, servicing, etc., as well as output markets to profit from pump-based irrigation. There is an emphasis on investments and policies to expand privately owned and managed irrigation, calling on governments, donors and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to improve the supply chain of motor pumps to accelerate private irrigation (Burney et al. 2013;Colenbrander and Koppen 2013). There is a tendency to think that pump irrigation based on shallow aquifers or small rivers and streams does not require giving attention to collective action as done in community-managed irrigation schemes. However, this leaves a huge gap that threatens the sustainability of pump irrigation in terms of livelihood benefits as well as the management of limited water resources. There are no systematic data on the potential and limitations of water in the numerous small rivers and streams found in SSA. Studies of the groundwater potential in SSA are at an early stage and broadly demonstrate that there is a large untapped potential, but in most cases the capacities and recharge rates of local aquifers will at some point limit the expansion of irrigation (MacDonald et al. 2012;Villholth 2013).The use of individually-owned small pumps has grown exponentially in parts of Asia, bringing huge benefits to smallholders as well as consumers but also creating difficult challenges, including aquifer depletion and unsustainable electricity costs, during the past decade. In Africa, the pump revolution is at an earlier stage than in Asia, and in most places is taking place in a different agroecological context: farmers are largely exploiting relatively small rivers, streams and shallow aquifers on small-to medium-sized watersheds. This report uses data from qualitative field research on one such small watershed (Fogera) in Ethiopia, and draws parallels to experiences in other African countries. It examines the roots of the problem, proposes some ideas on how social cooperation and institutional arrangements could contribute to the sustained productive use of these limited water sources, and identifies further research that could contribute to sustainable motor pump-irrigated agriculture and livelihood benefits in Africa.This report is based on qualitative field research in Fogera, a small watershed located in the Blue Nile River Basin in Ethiopia. In terms of administrative structure, Fogera is a woreda (district) in the South Gonder zone within the Amhara National Regional State of Ethiopia. The study involved field research that was conducted in successive years in three selected kebeles (sub-districts) of Fogera District, namely Alem Ber, Dibasifatira and Kokit, which represent differing landscape features -upland, midland and lowland, respectively, and also constitute interconnected landscape units in terms of the use and management of natural resources. Initial fieldwork was conducted in 2012 under the Nile Basin Development Challenge (NBDC) of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF). NBDC was part of a larger multi-disciplinary research for development program aimed at finding ways to improve the management of rainwater and resilience of rural livelihoods in a landscape framework 1 .Subsequent fieldwork for the investigation of small-scale irrigation was conducted in 2013, and this was followed up with fieldwork for a wider study on livelihoods, landscapes and decision making on land use which was conducted in 2014.The research employed a combination of qualitative and participatory methods of data collection, including informal and formal interviews, semi-structured interviews, key informant interviews, observations, focus group discussions, participatory problem identification and a participatory mapping exercise. The use of a combination of different techniques facilitated data triangulation and validation. Data collection at the local level was supported by a set of interview guides, the structures of which varied depending on the context. Sources of data included a range of community members such as men, women, youth, elders, development agents and agricultural professionals. Relevant secondary sources and written information were also gathered from agriculture offices in kebeles and woredas. The study also involved a systematic review and analysis of pertinent literature.The irrigation situation in Fogera, particularly motor pump irrigation, parallels the experiences of other developing countries where this method of irrigation has been expanding. Thus, while this paper begins with research from a small watershed in Ethiopia, its findings, analysis and arguments have wider global and theoretical implications. They highlight the prevailing focus on the technical and economic aspects of irrigation, disregarding its social aspects. Likewise, the study has wider theoretical and practical implications for the growing private, small-scale irrigation sector in Africa.Our approach to the social dimensions of motor pump irrigation is based on several related conceptual trends in the analysis of agriculture and natural resource management. First, we view irrigation as a socio-technical system (Mollinga 2003;Veldwisch et al. 2009). This approach emphasizes that the social dimensions of irrigation are as important as the technical dimensions. Social dimensions entail a range of interrelated social factors, including the organization of water use and management as well as issues of participation, equity, conflict resolution, collective action and institutions. The persistent perspective among technically-trained implementing agencies that irrigation is largely an engineering problem underlies the disappointing outcomes of irrigation investments.However, by itself, this paradigm is too narrow, as it does not adequately address the extent to which irrigated agriculture is embedded in larger agroecological systems. Researchers have come to recognize the importance of engaging with farmers to encourage innovation, and embedding this work in a wider conceptual socioecological framework characterized in the recent literature as \"integrated agricultural research for development\", \"sustainability science\" or \"integrated landscape initiatives\" (e.g., Sayer and Cassman 2013;Sayer et al. 2013;Milder et al. 2014). There is no universally agreed definition of landscape approaches, but most agree that it involves an attempt to approach agricultural intensification in a systems perspective that recognizes that there are multiple interactions and 1 For more information, visit http://nilebdc.org/ (accessed August 13, 2014).trade-offs with other uses and users or resources. Sayer et al. (2013) identified ten \"principles\" of the landscape approach, which include a strong emphasis on participation, continued learning, transparent communication, adaptive management and strengthening stakeholder capacities.This study focuses primarily on the social dimensions of irrigation, which we approach from an innovation systems and institutional creativity perspective. Not only do institutions play a critical role in enabling people and communities to cope with the problems they face, they also transform this capacity into a more creative and sustainable capacity to adapt to change (Berman et al. 2012). Institutions are defined as \"the rules of the game in society\" by institutional economists; but it is important to understand that these rules embody values, often deeply and subconsciously held, which are interpreted differently by different people, and are dynamic and contested (Merrey and Cook 2012). Therefore, although institutional arrangements for collective management of shared resources are characterized by a set of \"principles\" (e.g., Ostrom 1992), this does not mean they are amenable to being applied in the same way as the principles of physics are applied in designing and constructing physical infrastructure: \"social engineering\" does not work (Merrey et al. 2007).Therefore, we follow the lead of Francis Cleaver in adopting an approach to institutions which she refers to as \"critical institutional thinking\" (Cleaver 2012). This approach is difficult to characterize simply, but the basic idea is that humans are motivated by a complex set of perspectives, values and interests, some consciously held but many unconscious, which are derived from their social milieu. Therefore, institutional change and innovation are often the result of a messy, largely unpredictable, iterative, but ultimately creative process involving the engagement of local change agents with the institutions shaping and being shaped by the process. Cleaver refers to this creative process as \"institutional bricolage\" (Cleaver 2012;Merrey and Cook 2012). The \"bricoleur\" pieces together institutions in response to changing situations. These institutions are neither completely new nor completely traditional, but rather a dynamic hybrid combining elements of 'modern', 'traditional', and the 'formal' and 'informal\" (Cleaver 2012). We return to the implications of this perspective for motor pump irrigation in the conclusions.Irrigated agriculture has been an important feature of people's livelihood activities for many centuries. In Asia, Africa and the Americas, rural people have long-standing irrigation traditions. Communities having well-established 'irrigation cultures' -irrigation embedded in traditional irrigation societies -continue today. For example, in Bali, Indonesia, traditional irrigation has existed for over a thousand years, and farmers continue to use a complex system of canals managed through associated temple complexes to grow rice (Lansing 1991;Lansing and Kremer 1993;Lansing et al. 2009). Indigenous systems of irrigation also continue to function in other parts of Asia, including Nepal, India, Philippines and Sri Lanka, as well as in the Andes region of Latin America. In the hills of Nepal, farmers collectively manage small and even rather large irrigation systems; most of these systems continue to operate today with little or no government involvement (Sharma et al. 2009;Ostrom et al. 2011). The system of tank irrigation is another form of tradition in southern India and Sri Lanka with a history of nearly two thousand years. Rural people use small reservoirs or \"tanks\" to irrigate their fields, both for supplementary irrigation of rice during the rainy season and to grow other crops in the dry season (Engberg-Pedersen 2011; Leach 1961).Such traditional irrigation schemes require effective collective action to construct, reconstruct and maintain canals and weirs, and to deal with resource mobilization, settling disputes and sharing scarce water resources. They employ various social arrangements to facilitate and structure the use and management of irrigation schemes. Ostrom (2008) highlighted that farmers in Asia have long relied on their own knowledge to develop complex irrigation systems, including dams, tunnels and water diversion structures, forging joint responsibilities to provide the resources needed and set rules that are agreed upon for allocating water and enforcing the rules.Examining the experiences of farmer-managed irrigation schemes in Asia and other developing countries, Ostrom and Gardner (1993) argued that self-governing irrigation systems can work if they have been allowed to self-organize. This observation is supported by many other studies documenting how local communities have long been able to use and manage their natural resources held as commons (e.g., McCay and Acheson 1987;Berkes 1987;Ostrom 1990;Feeny et al. 1990;Wade 1987).The Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s bolstered the importance of irrigation as an essential agricultural input. The Green Revolution involved the intensive use of irrigation combined with improved varieties of seeds and chemical fertilizers. It has been stated that, \"the Green Revolution was as much a story of water as it was of modern crop technology\" (Burney et al. 2013). Small-scale as well as large irrigation systems have been developed, expanded and \"modernized\" by governments and donors for decades (Pinstrup-Andersen and Hazell 1985;Borlaug 2000;Roy et al. 2007;Burney et al. 2013).In the wake of the Green Revolution, orientations that primarily associate agricultural development with technological advancement seem to have been strengthened, providing the impetus for a growing focus on technological solutions -in essence, returning to an older and seemingly discredited perspective. Over a decade ago, Norman Borlaug envisaged a \"Blue Revolution,\" where technology would lead the way toward higher water use productivity (Borlaug 2000). Borlaug stressed that the main concern should be on how farmers would be able to use new and modern technologies. Accordingly, the dissemination and application of modern technologies is seen as a way forward for improving food production.This emphasis on technological solutions particularly focuses on SSA, which is seen as having failed to benefit from modern irrigation. In recent years, new initiatives are responding to that vision. This particularly refers to initiatives that call for a \"uniquely African Green Revolution\" or \"New Green Revolution in Africa.\" New inter-institutional alliances for agricultural development, involving governments, private foundations, United Nations organizations, and transnational collaborative agricultural research programs and corporations have emerged (Burney et al. 2013;Daño 2007). Irrigation constitutes the most capitalintensive component of these initiatives (Daño 2007), but the model also envisions farmers purchasing expensive high-yielding seed varieties accompanied by fertilizers and pesticides. To facilitate this input-intensive model of agriculture, there is a growing interest in expanding irrigation in SSA. African governments and national policies have recently placed particular emphasis on irrigation expansion as an important strategy to enhancing food security and securing livelihoods (World Bank et al. 2007;Karina and Mwaniki 2011;Lankford 2003). The Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP), promoted by the African Union's New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) Planning and Coordination Agency (NPCA), gives very high priority to expanding irrigation as a basis for transforming African agriculture (Bwalya et al. 2009).In Africa, the development of new small-scale irrigation schemes with government and donor support, shadowing traditional schemes, continues to be biased towards the technological dimension of irrigation and its exaggerated benefits (e.g., Yami 2013). This is despite the rhetoric on farmer participation. It reflects what is described as a \"persistent mind-set\" prevalent among interveners that emphasizes modern irrigation technology as the essential route to modernizing agriculture (Veldwisch et al. 2009). In the early years of government and donor investments in irrigation, the focus was on introducing more 'modern' technology in traditional community-managed schemes, and designing and constructing new schemes with little or no reference to the social and cultural dimensions of irrigation. There have been changes over time, with increasing attention being given to organizing farmers in the form of water users' associations (WUAs) and promoting irrigation management transfer (IMT) on larger schemes. However, such reforms are usually too limited, in that they focus too much on farmers and not enough on the wider institutional framework; for example, IMT has largely sought to transfer the financial burden of governments to farmers (Merrey et al. 2007). In addition, the African rural context makes farmer-managed irrigation especially challenging: in addition to supportive institutional arrangements and policies, it is critical to enhance opportunities for wealth-creation through irrigated agriculture (Shah et al. 2002).Irrigation involves multiple stakeholders with varying interests. We emphasize the importance of carefully considering the context of user participation in water use. \"Participation\" is often understood in terms of the actors and stakeholders using water and their involvement in water governance (Montaña et al. 2009). It generally implies empowering users to varying degrees to take responsibility for their scheme. While agreeing with this general notion of participation, the call for considering the broader context of user participation in water use refers to understanding the embedded power dynamics and social categories of resource users as well as the various uses of water in a landscape perspective.Water sources used for irrigation largely belong to the public and their uses affect a wide range of local stakeholders. How different categories of people participate in water use has significant implications in terms of their social relationships over resource use. Some researchers have noted the importance of considering the multiple uses and users of water as well as the actors that are included and excluded (van Koppen et al. 2009). The conception and practices of irrigation should pay attention to the multiple dimensions of water uses and users, and their interactions for and impacts on successful resource use.Equity is another critical issue in water management. It encompasses a wide range of issues pertaining to water access, use, distribution and benefits. Equity in access to and use of water, and the distribution of its benefits, involves analytically different but overlapping forms (Phansalkar 2007). These include spatial equity, social equity, gender equity and inter-generational equity. Thus, it is important to consider how access to and use of water as well as the distribution of its benefits differ across different categories of communities, and the implications for sustainable irrigation use and livelihood benefits. Put differently, 'equity' is a socially defined concept. For small farmers investing in a community-managed irrigation system, it is often defined in terms of receiving benefits commensurate with the size of their investment; in other cases, it may be defined in terms of all households having equal access to water or all households of a particular status. Local concepts of equity rarely include the concept of 'equality', for example, between men and women, or landowners and laborers. However, traditional community-managed irrigation schemes usually recognize the critical importance of long-term mutual relationships and patterns of reciprocity.On the other hand, interventions that contradict such functional patterns of social relationships around water use will negatively alter existing social relations and patterns of equity. Ostrom and Gardner (1993) noted that external interventions that disregard these mutual dependencies and reciprocal relationships among users often prove destructive. Recent observations have also highlighted the unintended and undesirable effects of interventions that result in inequitable access to water. Lankford (2004) found that irrigation improvement projects in Tanzania affected the long-standing equity of water distribution among small farmer-managed schemes sharing a river, leading to inequitable access to water: with the introduction of 'modern' off-takes, upstream users greatly benefited while reducing water supply for those downstream. Similarly, in Bangladesh, water resources development projects that mainly focused on promoting the intensive use of water for irrigation have created inequity in the distribution and allocation of water resources among different stakeholders (Rasul and Chowdhury 2010). There are other examples from Asia, some of which were documented many years ago; in one case in the Philippines, the donor and irrigation agency initially ignored existing community-managed irrigation schemes that were very old and proposed to build entirely new ones that would have obliterated them (Yabes 1994;Siy 1982).Inequitable access to water, and differential water use and benefits are often the causes for conflicts over scarce water resources. Natural resource management involves competing interests; it is a \"form of conflict management\" (Castro and Nielsen 2003). Conflicts may arise out of competition for scarce water resources and disagreements over its use. Such conflicts need to be managed for sustainable water use. Elinor Ostrom argues that irrigation systems are among the most important forms of commonpool resources; they require conflict resolution mechanisms to resolve conflicts among users (Ostrom 1990(Ostrom , 1992(Ostrom , 1999)). Long-standing traditional irrigation schemes are noted for their success in settling disputes and sharing scarce water resources. They rely on a familiar social framework to resolve conflicts among users, thereby providing guidance for the distribution of water and the sharing of scarce common water resources.In community-managed irrigation schemes, cooperation is essential for pooling labor and other resources to construct and maintain canals and channels, allocate and share water, regulate and monitor the provision and use of water, and facilitate other necessary joint ventures. The cooperation of users for irrigation plays a significant role in shaping responses to issues of social trust, reciprocity, competition, conflicts, equity, and other mutual concerns related to water access, use and management. Appropriate social organization and rules for collective action are essential to coordinate cooperation for irrigation use. These rules shape interactions, and are contested and revised over time through social actions.How to promote or create effective institutions is a complex issue. A package of institutional designs imposed from outside is unlikely to fit the multi-dimensional conditions of irrigation schemes in diverse social, cultural and economic contexts, with linked constraints and opportunities. Where institutional innovations are needed, they should build on existing or potential institutional arrangements. This requires a careful examination of these relationships and exploration of spheres of complementary relationships for natural resource management (Dessalegn 2009). The search for enabling institutional arrangements must also consider multiple options. This process can be characterized as \"facilitated institutional bricolage,\" promoting and facilitating the creation of institutions from a diverse range of sources (Merrey and Cook 2012;Cleaver 2012). Such a locally-driven, but possibly externally facilitated, process is more likely to lead to effective legitimate institutional arrangements than structures imposed from outside.The discussion of irrigation as a sociotechnical phenomenon and the need to encourage local institutional solutions applies to small-scale private irrigation technologies as well, although it has received very little attention. In recent years, small-scale private, individualized irrigation technologies have taken off, first in Asia and more recently in SSA. This is due to a combination of factors, including increased availability of lowcost pumps, sprayers and drip irrigation systems, and urbanization, which creates local markets for high-value products and, in some cases, global markets (Giordano et al. 2012;de Fraiture and Giordano 2014;Burney et al. 2013;Namara et al. 2011). Although there are exceptions, for example, the fadama projects in Nigeria and the private irrigation projects in Niger (both supported by the World Bank; see Abric et al. 2011), much of this development has occurred with no formal government investments or even policy attention.Promotion of private, small-scale irrigation is perceived as an alternative to collective schemes with their high transaction costs and the need for social cooperation. There is an assumption that getting the markets and value chains set up, and putting in place more encouraging policies (e.g., favorable exchange rates, taxes, etc.), is sufficient on the \"institutional\" side (e.g., Colenbrander and van Koppen 2013). In addition, farmers too are likely to see pump irrigation as a way of escaping the often onerous transaction costs associated with collective schemes. The result of this is insufficient attention being given by all parties -government, donors, farmers -to the need for institutional arrangements to manage water resources, which are still 'shared' even if 'invisible'. This refers to water from small streams and rivers, and also to groundwater, which is now recognized as a potentially significant source of water for irrigation as well as for other uses in Africa (e.g., Pavelic et al. 2013;Villholth 2013). There is no doubt about the claim that groundwater is a significant but underused resource, but there are cautions as well. In some places, for example, in parts of South Asia, China and the USA, the un-regulated, rapid expansion of wells and pumps has led to serious depletion of groundwater resources. In some areas in South India, it has also resulted in the depletion of water in small tanks, by pumping groundwater that is dependent on the water level in tanks (Shah et al. 2007). There are also less well-documented cases of over-pumping from small rivers and streams leading to conflict.2 Veldwisch et al.(2009) cautioned against the tendency of rushing toward new irrigation infrastructure. This applies to the emerging pump revolution in Africa.The rapid spread of irrigation pumping technology, disregarding its social dimensions, is likely to have significant adverse implications. Innovations and improvements achieved in the technical aspects of irrigation, without considering the social factors, will not necessarily guarantee successful irrigation experiences (Montaña et al. 2009). While the potential solutions to the social side of community-managed irrigation schemes are understood fairly well, the equally critical importance of addressing the social dimensions of private, small-scale irrigation is not well recognized, and the possible solutions are not clear. The next section of this paper brings this issue into sharper focus through a case study in Ethiopia. cultivation season is the wet season, from June to September. Livelihood zone profiles of the region also indicate that most agricultural activities depend on this single rainy season (MoARD 2007). The major wet season crops include teff, maize, millet and rice. The cultivation of rice has been introduced recently. Some variations in crop cultivation exist depending on specific agroecological conditions; for example, rice is largely cultivated in the lowland and midland areas, but not in the upland areas.The agricultural calendar, i.e., planting and harvesting, starts in May/June and ends by December, depending on the type of crop (Table 1). Dry season cultivation depends on access to irrigation and it may continue from October to March/April. Dry season crops include cereals, such as emmer wheat, chickpea, grass pea and lentils, as well as vegetables, such as onion and tomato.Fogera lies in the Blue Nile River Basin of Ethiopia, upstream of Lake Tana. It is a woreda (district) of the South Gonder administrative zone within the Amhara National Regional State (ANRS), which is one of the regional states that make up the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) (Figure 1). The population of Fogera is estimated at 228,449, of which 203,259 are rural inhabitants and the remaining 25,190 are urban dwellers (CSA 2007). Data obtained from rural kebele (sub-district) offices indicate that the population of the three study kebeles, Alem Ber, Dibasifatira and Kokit is 7,005, 7,703 and 5,190, respectively.Rural people in Fogera depend on agriculture for their livelihoods. They practice plow-based agriculture using oxen as the main draft animal power. Farmers grow various crops depending on the season -wet and dry seasons. The main Small-scale Irrigation in Fogera, Ethiopia Source: Prepared with the support provided by Yenenesh Abebe, a geographic information system (GIS) expert at IWMI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Fogera is largely considered to be self-sufficient in food production. The woreda is included in the Tana Zuria Livelihood Zone, where households' own crop production contributes to a very high percentage of its food consumption (MoARD 2007).Livestock are also central to the Fogera farming systems. Farmers rear different types of animals such as oxen, cows, sheep and donkeys. While the number and types of livestock vary depending on the situation of the households, cattle (particularly oxen and cows) constitute the largest proportion of the livestock reared in the area (Table 2). This relates to the vital role of oxen for plowing, the importance of cows for milk and the cash value of cattle in times of need. Sheep are largely reared for sale, while donkeys usually serve the purpose of transporting goods from rural to urban areas.Farmers generate income from the sale of grains and vegetables. The district center, Wereta, as well as other nearby cities are among the market centers where farmers sell grains, vegetables, and livestock either directly or through brokers. While sheep and cattle are often traded within the surrounding towns and cities, cattle have also been supplied to export markets, particularly to Sudan (Akalu et al. 2009;MoARD 2007).Agriculture is the mainstay of the Ethiopian and Fogera economies, and the main source of living for the majority of the rural population. It is largely based on smallholder rainfed farming. However, the reliance on rainfed agriculture is often problematic. It is vulnerable to rainfall uncertainties, i.e., erratic rainfall, recurrent droughts and other linked factors that threaten farming as a livelihood. Therefore, in recent years, small-scale irrigation has expanded in Fogera. Farmers practice both motor pump irrigation and traditional irrigation based on the diversion of water from rivers and streams. Other observers have also noted the diversity of small-scale irrigation in the Blue Nile River Basin of Ethiopia (e.g., Eguavoen et al. 2012). Some of the rivers used for irrigation in the upper and lower zones of Fogera include Rib, Alemayehu, Marza, Mizewa and Dibikena (Akalu et al. 2009). Data obtained from farmers and agricultural extension officers in our study kebeles also indicate that these rivers and other rivers, such as Nachurit, Dibor and Bastkwa, are the basis for farmers' smallscale irrigation endeavors. Rib is a perennial river that flows through several kebeles, including Dibasifatira and Kokit, while the others are seasonal rivers that flow across different kebeles (Figure 2). There has also been a growing interest within the government and among its partners in expanding irrigation at the national level. Recently, the Ethiopian government has ranked irrigation development as high priority in its agricultural and rural development agenda. Irrigation is addressed in key government policy documents, including 'A Plan for Accelerated and Sustained Development to End Poverty (PASDEP)' and the more recent 'Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP)', where irrigation is identified as a key instrument to enhance agricultural production, food security, economic growth and agrarian development (FDRE 2006(FDRE , 2010)). The government is promoting large-as well as small-scale irrigation; the latter includes modernizing and expanding 'traditional' irrigation schemes as well as encouraging private small-scale irrigation. For example, expanding 'household irrigation technology' -mainly pump irrigation -is a major priority of the Ethiopian Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA).3 Farmers in Fogera assert that irrigation has brought important benefits through the cultivation of multiple crops for both food consumption and sale. Farmers practicing irrigation emphasized that they used to cultivate mainly rainfed crops, such as teff and millet. Now they are able to shift from producing only during the rainy season to producing during both the rainy and dry seasons. Irrigation has enabled them to produce multiple crops, including onion, tomato, grass pea, wheat, emmer wheat, maize, chickpea, lentils and fenugreek. This situation has spurred enthusiasm, particularly for motor pump irrigation. The use of motor pumps has transformed local irrigation practices, expanding irrigated agriculture beyond the scope of traditional irrigation. Data obtained from kebele agricultural offices during fieldwork indicate that 4,682 ha of land are irrigated in the three study kebeles. This accounts for over 50% of the total cultivated land (8,131 ha). In Fogera District, at large, 27,141 ha are irrigated, accounting for 47% of the total cultivated land (57,444 ha) (FWARDO 2013). Fogera is in the Lake Tana Basin, an area that is especially favorable for irrigation in terms of gradient, soils, water availability and climate.In Fogera, traditional irrigation, locally referred to as mesno, is practiced through river and stream diversions, and the construction of channels. The history of traditional irrigation in the area dates back to the pre-1974 imperial regime of Ethiopia.A key informant in Fogera recalled that mesno was practiced during the Haileselassie regime and was administered by dagna (judges). Local representatives of the regime would provide the authority for enforcing activities agreed upon for irrigation use. Another key informant in Alem Ber kebele indicated that they started to practice mesno in 1977 during the Derg regime due to lack of rain. Traditional irrigation schemes have also existed in other parts of northern Ethiopia, involving a system of water allocation through the mediation of 'water fathers' and 'water judges' (Pankhurst 2002;Dessalegn 2001;Teshome 2003). Case studies conducted in northern Ethiopia also indicated that, while irrigation was generally limited during the imperial regime and largely controlled by landlords, it expanded under the Derg government (1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991) due to the threat of famine and efforts at collective farming; market forces and investment by the government and donors have subsequently resulted in further expansion under the current government (Pankhurst 2002;Awulachew et al. 2005;Teshome 2006).In Fogera, although traditional irrigation was practiced in the past, its expansion is a recent phenomenon. Local people indicated that its wider practice only emerged since the turn of this century. A combination of factors, including increased rainfall uncertainty, and a growing realization of the importance of irrigation and extension support, has re-invigorated local interest in experimenting with traditional irrigation. In explaining this shift, a key informant in Dibasifatira said, \"When the rain stopped in September, we would also stop cultivation. The canal came about 11 years ago. When the rain decreased, we tried the canal. We have continued to use it thereafter.\" The informant was referring to the mesno scheme located in Kero village, which is based on a diversion of water from Mizewa River. Key informants indicated that the scheme serves more than 70 households. A kebele document regarding irrigation use shows that it is practiced by more than 100 households and the irrigated area is about 40 ha. The size of irrigated plots ranges from 0.25-1.0 ha; most farmers' irrigated plots are 0.5 ha.Farmers around Bila village in Dibasifatira also use a mesno by diverting the Nachurit River. Key informants as well as agricultural extension officers indicated that the number of users of this mesno is between 60 and 70 households, and the irrigated area covers about 30 ha of land. The average size of irrigated plots is 0.5 ha. In Alem Ber, around Mikael and Wendegere areas, farmers use another mesno by diverting water from Bastkwa River. A discussion that involved a group of mesno users and agricultural extension officers revealed that this scheme serves more than 50 households and the irrigated area is about 15 ha. Mesno is practiced by an even smaller groups of farmers. For instance, in Alem Ber, a dozen households who work on adjacent crop fields in Tilik-mesk village use a mesno by diverting water from Aguwa-Dibor River. A discussion with a group of mesno users and agricultural extension officers revealed that the irrigated area is about 5 ha and most farmers' irrigated plots are about 0.5 ha.Farmers are eager to take advantage of the streams and rivers passing through their villages. During interviews, such farmers passionately reported their recent experiences and accomplishments by emphasizing how they have managed to make use of hitherto 'idle' water sources. This was also evident during focus group discussions with farmers. For instance, during a discussion with a group of farmers in Dibasifatira, participating farmers strongly shared the view of their colleagues who emphasized that, \"In the past, the water would just go through cutting the land. Today, we are asking her where she is going.\" Similarly, participants of the focus group discussions in Alem Ber underlined that, \"Today, there is no water that freely goes around the field. If found, she will be diverted.\" Thus, farmers seem more determined to utilize the available water. This situation reflects how local perceptions of irrigation have changed recently, with farmers attaching more value to its importance.In rural Fogera, social cooperation is an important defining feature of traditional irrigation, as it involves social cooperation from the onset of planning the scheme through to water use and irrigation schedules. Local users pool their labor, ideas and commitments to work on irrigation facilities, i.e., river diversion, dam construction and the preparation of water channels. The social cooperation and coordination that such activities entail are not a one-time activity. It is work that requires continuity, involving the construction and subsequent dismantling of the traditional dam. Users build a small dam from soil. Key informants indicated that they are often cautious about the potential adverse impacts of this small dam, particularly during the rainy season, in that it may overflow and inundate the surrounding area. They avoid this danger by dismantling the dam once the period of irrigation (October to January) is over and rebuilding it after the rain stops. Farmers also try different ways to maintain traditional irrigation structures. For instance, they reinforce mud-weirs by mixing dry straw and mud as plaster while using stones to support it. They also use soil-filled sacks (soil bags) to prevent erosion of the mud structure.In many respects, the users' readiness to accept social cooperation reflects their understanding of traditional irrigation as a social undertaking. The social trust embedded in their joint efforts also has a significant implication for collective action in irrigation use and management. This was evident from farmers' remarks regarding the norms and practices of water use. For instance, in response to whether users adhere to norms of shared water use or tend to be self-centered, disregarding others, a farmer in Alem Ber emphatically stated that, \"We have equally worked together to bring the water, and we all have to use it equally.\" Water usage is regulated by water use turns and irrigation schedules depending on water availability.Key informants explained that people who work together during initial preparations jointly discuss and arrange irrigation schedules and water-use turns. Then, individuals use water turn by turn based on specific schedules. The system is coordinated by water judges. Several water judges from each user's village constitute a water committee of five to six members. The practice of irrigation schedules based on wateruse turns is instrumental in avoiding destructive competition and ensuing conflicts over water use. Local users are aware of the negative implications of uncoordinated water-use practices. A key informant stressed that, \"irrigation has to be used on the basis of turns, so that people should not fight.\" However, this does not necessarily suggest that irrigation water use involves no competition and conflict: traditional irrigation users in Fogera indicated that competition and conflicts do arise between users over scheduled water turns. However, they can be mediated by the local institutional arrangements. Individuals may violate the 'water turn' system to pursue their own advantages at the expense of other users, but the water committee will intervene and address such situations.Scholars maintain that the rule of exclusion/ inclusion is an important principle that guides collective use and management of natural resources (McCay and Acheson 1987;Ostrom et al. 1999). This is reflected in traditional irrigation practices in Fogera. However, the local notion of inclusion/exclusion is not rigid and does not focus on restricting or denying access to water. It facilitates social cooperation that enables irrigation water use. Who is included for water access in irrigation schedules depends on whether they have participated in joint activities during the preparation of the traditional irrigation scheme. In principle, those who have failed to participate in such activities will be excluded. However, this customary principle is flexible, in that such individuals can be included later if they pay a fine. The fine represents a form of punishment for failing to take part in the social cooperation required for irrigation usage, while the individual will ultimately get access to irrigation water by paying his fair share in cash.A study conducted in several districts, including Fogera in eastern Lake Tana, also revealed that traditional irrigation schemes are practiced across these areas (Akalu et al. 2009).The study corroborates our observations on traditional irrigation. Traditional irrigation schemes involve water allocation and irrigation schedules whose management is done by Yewuha Abbat (water fathers), with the assistance of a group of water distributors and guidelines that include informal bylaws, operational norms and provisions for penalties (Akalu et al. 2009). In Fogera, this study was conducted in the upper and lower zones, including two of our study kebeles, Dibasifatira and Kokit. Other observations that focused on a village-level mesno scheme in a different kebele in Fogera (Deneke et al. 2011;Eguavoen et al. 2012), while noting the selforganization of traditional irrigation including water allocation and irrigation schedules, highlighted irregular practices. Variations in traditional irrigation practices may exist between different localities depending on differing political-ecological contexts and other conditions. Further research should be conducted to understand the scope and relevance of variations in irrigation experiences.The history of motor pump irrigation in Fogera dates back to the period of cooperative farming during the previous socialist (Derg) regime. After overthrowing the imperial government, the new Derg government introduced a wide range of agrarian reforms including land tenure changes and state-organized farm cooperatives. The initial experience of motor pump irrigation in the area can be traced back to a cooperative farm which operated over two decades ago. A key informant in Kokit recalled this situation and explained their experiences by stating, \"During the Derg in 1979/80, they organized us under a cooperative farm in Shega kebele and gave us motor pumps. We used the motor pumps to cultivate rice and got a good harvest.\" Nevertheless, key informants indicated that the recent practice of individual use of motor pumps for irrigation was introduced less than 10 years ago. This involved collaboration between 'investors' and local farmers. A key informant explained that, \"Initially traders were coming from the Wereta town with motor pumps to work with farmers here. The farmers would contribute labor and land, while the others would bring the motor pump, seeds and fuel. Later, they would share the harvest equally. After two years, the farmers became free from dependence. They were able to buy their own motor pumps and became selfsufficient.\"The wider expansion of motor pumps is a very recent phenomenon. Interviews revealed that the use of motor pumps began expanding rapidly only in the past three years. Farmers' favorable views regarding its benefits have spurred their enthusiasm for motor pump irrigation. A total of 20,916 pumps were reportedly distributed in the region at the end of 2009 alone (Namara et al. 2013). This figure is likely to have risen in subsequent years. Important enabling factors have facilitated the dissemination of the technology. Credit to buy motor pumps is now available through the Amhara Credit and Savings Institution in conjunction with the woreda agriculture office. While the latter delivers the motor pumps, the former provides the credit to purchase them. Credit facilities with facilitated supply of motor pumps have enabled farmers to acquire the technology.Besides, the use of motor pumps has expanded through local arrangements. Interviews and discussions conducted with farmers revealed that sharecropping has been an important factor in enabling farmers to gain access to motor pumps. Farmers have drawn upon experiences from their traditional sharing and exchange arrangements. They have engaged in sharecropping arrangements for a long time, involving those without oxen for plowing and others with oxen or landless people and landowners. This relationship has been extended to motor pump irrigation, in that farmers who have no motor pump engage in sharecropping arrangements with those that own motor pumps. In this arrangement, the former contribute land and labor, while the latter provide the motor with fuel and seeds, and they share the harvest equally. Thus, motor pump irrigation has been incorporated into local farming practices through traditional sharecropping arrangements.Farming enterprises boosted by motor pump irrigation now provide better income opportunities. Farmers use the grains and vegetables they produce for alternate purposes -cash and food, depending on the household's particular needs. Interviews with farmers indicated that onions, tomatoes and emmer wheat are largely sold. In particular, onions are widely grown as a cash crop. Farmers appreciate how onions have become an important source of cash. For instance, a farmer in Dibasifatira expressed his appreciation by stating, \"We can now earn ETB 5,000 4 from the sale of onions harvested from a small plot of land.\" A government agricultural extension officer in the area mentioned that a farmer could generate up to ETB 80,000 from onions produced on 0.25 ha. A recent assessment of agriculture in the Lake Tana Basin (Akalu et al. 2009) also indicated that onion production in Fogera has been increasing and the area has become a source of onion seeds for other areas of the Amhara region. A key informant in Kokit stated the importance of this crop by stating, \"It is onions that have changed the farmer these days.People who cultivate onions have changed a lot.They have acquired new assets; some have also owned grinding mills.\" Current motor pump irrigation practices in Fogera suggest that their pump-based irrigation is focused on pumping water on an individual household basis. A household usually relies on its own labor to transport the motor pump and pipe to a convenient water point where it sets the machine up to pump water and irrigate a field (Figure 3). In this way, farmers in Kokit draw water from the Rib River and irrigate their plots around the river path. Pump users in Dibasifatira pump water from the Mizewa and Marza rivers, and irrigate their lands in the vicinity of these rivers. A household may also use a donkey to transport the machine, depending on the distance to a convenient water point or to the place where the motor pump was rented (Figure 3). The use of motor pumps has facilitated access to river water for irrigation on an individual basis. However, the technology is being implemented without social cooperation and institutional arrangements for sharing of the common resource -the small rivers. Irrigation using a motor pump is an individualized undertaking, with no coordination and restrictions. This situation differs from the joint responsibilities required for the successful use and management of traditional irrigation. The lack of institutional arrangements to guide motor pump irrigation is widespread. This is also perpetuated through conceptions of irrigation that differentiate motor pump irrigation from traditional irrigation. This was identified through the analysis of local explanations in the course of the fieldwork. The local term for irrigation is mesno. Key informants described its features in terms of water use turns, schedules and other forms of collaboration related to utilizing river water for irrigated agriculture. During the fieldwork, such explanations were followed up with probes and queries regarding how such forms of collaboration related to motor pump use. Key informants clearly emphasized that their focus of description was mesno, separate from motor pumps. They responded to such queries by insisting that they were talking about mesno and mesno use, while emphasizing that individuals use the \"motor\" to draw river water and use it on their own. The notion that motor pump irrigation is different from traditional irrigation is reflected in other descriptions as well. In villages where both motor pump and traditional irrigation are practiced, informants described collaborative irrigation use in relation to mesno. In areas where only the motor pump is used, informants responding to queries regarding cooperation in utilizing river water tended to emphasize that they do not practice mesno. During a participatory mapping exercise with a group of farmers in Kokit, participants classified crop cultivation as 'crops grown with rain' and 'crops grown using the river'. When asked whether the latter refers to mesno, they explained that it is not mesno but \"motor\".Thus, local conceptions of motor pump irrigation versus traditional schemes differ depending on whether they refer to the source of water or social cooperation for water use. Motor pump irrigation is linked with traditional schemes when referring to ways of watering fields by extracting water from rivers and streams: artificially supplying water to crops versus depending on rainfall. On the other hand, motor pump irrigation differs from traditional irrigation, mesno, which is conceptualized as including social cooperation for water use. Motor pump irrigation does not involve the social attributes of irrigation embedded in the notion of mesno. Farmers use the term 'motor' to refer to individual pump irrigation. They associate the presence of a system that coordinates water use and irrigation schedules with traditional irrigation in contrast to motor pump irrigation. They link the latter with a situation of uninhibited usage, which is further revealed in the discussion below.M o t o r p u m p i r r i g a t i o n p r a c t i c e s l a c k mechanisms for water allocation and irrigation scheduling. Interviews and discussions held with farmers clearly emphasized this situation. For instance, a key informant in Dibasifatira stated that, \"There is no water use turn with motor pump use. Water is used as one wants to use [it]. People stop when the water stops.\" Similarly, a key informant in Kokit indicated that, \"Motor pump use has no water committee. It has no turn. It is possible for everyone to irrigate as they would like to.\" Such explanations were widely shared among a range of local people contacted during the fieldwork. Focus group discussions conducted with groups of farmers in the three study kebeles also revealed that motor pump irrigation practices are devoid of water use turns and irrigation schedules. Observations of motor pump irrigation practices during fieldwork and interviews held with such pump users also reflected that irrigation with a motor pump is an individualized undertaking.Our examination of motor pump irrigation in Fogera suggests that priority is given to acquiring and using the technology, i.e., the motor pump.The new technology has also quickly assumed its position as an important implement to be possessed by farming households. Government institutions and affiliated development personnel have been keen to facilitate the use of the technology at the local level. These efforts have focused on facilitating credit arrangements and delivering motor pumps. At the global level, the focus is largely on promoting the expansion of individualistic irrigation through improving the supply chain of motor pumps (Burney et al. 2013;Colenbrander and van Koppen 2013;Merrey and Sally 2008). Indeed, the use of motor pumps is a significant and welcome development of small-scale irrigation. However, we argue that the emphasis placed on motor pumps for improved irrigation performance should move beyond the sole focus of acquiring the technology and disseminating its use.Pump-based individualistic irrigation practices based on small rivers and streams, without effective institutional arrangements and collective action for managing the shared resource, have counterproductive implications. Information obtained through interviews and discussions held with farmers in Fogera revealed the emerging problems. Farmers have begun to experience the consequences of the lack of social cooperation as motor pump irrigation expands. Motor pump users have become concerned about how the competition for water use is growing, limiting the duration of water availability and creating water shortages. Irrigation users in Tachawa said that the water they use from the Rib River does not come easily to their area due to there being many motor pump users in upstream areas. A woman farmer in Kokit described this situation as frustrating. She emphatically stated that, \"Now the motors are randomly placed in every direction, so there is a shortage of water.\" This remark was shared by other people as well. A 50-year old farmer who was disappointed by this situation said, \"Now the main problem is water shortage. Otherwise, the area is gold.\" Another study also reported that communities around the Mizewa River complained about water shortages due to pumping of water in upstream areas (Zemadim et al. 2013).This situation of increased competition for water use was reported by a range of motor pump users. It should be noted that motor pump use is not limited to owners of the machines. Farmers who do not own motor pumps also gain access to them through sharecropping arrangements. In addition, the use of motor pumps has expanded through rentals, which generate income for farmers who possess motor pumps while enabling others to irrigate. The rental cost of motor pumps is in the range of ETB 12-15/hour (about USD 0.80) plus the cost of fuel.Farmers pumping water from the downstream portions of streams insist that users in the upstream parts always use the water as they want and deprive them of their share. They complain about the lack of any mechanism to check and deal with water blocking or over-pumping. Government agricultural officers who provide farmers with extension support also emphasized the growing competition for pumping river water. An extension agent in one of the study kebeles explained such problems of irrigation use, emphasizing that, \"There are too many motor pumps now. Everybody has a motor pump and it is difficult to follow-up. If we were to try and follow-up in our kebele, it would be difficult for us to follow-up things in another kebele.\" Not only does this situation reveal the lack of intervillage coordination for water use, it also indicates how the gap in social cooperation goes beyond inter-village relations, in that irrigation use and associated problems crosscut kebele boundaries.Shortage of water has been identified as a growing problem during interviews and focus group discussions conducted with farmers in Fogera. They have indicated that the amount of water available for irrigation is decreasing. Rivers are getting 'weaker' and drying up before their regular seasonal period. For instance, during a group discussion, farmers in Dibasifatira indicated that, \"There are so many motor pumps now that the Marza River we use for motor pump irrigation has dried up earlier than its season. Before the presence of many motors, we could use the river from October to February. Now it has dried up at the start of January. As a result, the crops we planted collapsed.\" In interviews, farmers who pump water from the Mizewa River also remarked that the amount of water available for irrigation has decreased due to increased motor pump users. These pump users mentioned, in particular, that the cultivation of a cash crop, which has recently begun in their upper surrounding area, has reduced the amount of water available to them. As a middle-aged farmer indicated, \"Before this increase in chat (a cash crop) cultivation using pumped water, the water that comes to our area would last until March or April. However, now the water flow has become weak around February.\" A study that involved a participatory approach to hydrometeorological monitoring (Zemadim et al. 2013) stated that the pumping of water for irrigation reportedly resulted in one of the main tributaries of the Mizewa River going dry in the dry season.Interviews held with farmers during fieldwork conducted in 2013 revealed the increasing impacts of problems related to uncoordinated individualistic motor pump use based on rivers. Farmers in Wenbel indicated that they have now stopped cultivating onions due to a shortage of water. They attributed the reduced water availability to an increase in motor pump users in their area as well as in the upstream areas. In particular, they emphasized the effect of increased competition from pump users in the upstream areas that are included in a different kebele (subdistrict). A key informant stated, \"They (upstream users located in a different sub-district) started using motor pumps after us. But, now, the number of motor pump users has increased there and the water has decreased here. Therefore, we stopped cultivating onions due to fear of crop failure.\" A farmer who contrasted the current situation with prior experiences explained that, \"We have benefited from the cultivation of onions for some three years. Now, there are many motors in use and the water has reduced. So, we have abandoned the onions. I haven't planted onions this year. In the past, the water used to serve us from October to February. But, now, it serves us until December, at most. It stops after that. If the water is not available until February, it is useless for cultivating onions.\"Information obtained during fieldwork conducted in 2014 also suggests an increasing trend in the competition for water use. For example, motor pump users extracting water from the Marza River insisted that water availability had declined. Farmers interviewed indicated that the problem of water shortage has affected their cultivation of onions. A motor pump user stated that, \"We do not have water from January onwards. This is because the river dries up. Last year, we planted onions, but the river dried up in January. For onion cultivation, there needs to be a supply of water until February.\" An interview conducted with a rural kebele official also highlighted the increasing competition for water use and linked the impacts this had on onion cultivation. He stated that, \" N o w , t h e n u m b e r o f p e o p l e extracting river water using motor pumps has increased. Competition among those pumping water from here and there has reduced water availability. This has hindered the cultivation of onions. So, this year, farmers have shifted to cultivating aja (emmer wheat); it requires a smaller amount of water. Onions need to be irrigated six to seven times, but it is sufficient if aja is irrigated three times.\"There seems to be an emerging response in terms of changing cropping patterns due to the declining water availability. For example, aja (emmer wheat) cultivation, which requires less water, may be replacing onion cultivation. Farmers we interviewed indicated that many people are getting involved in aja cultivation. This shift towards aja cultivation indicates an emerging response to decreased water availability for onion cultivation. Further investigations should be carried out to understand the scope and implications of such responses. This trend, if confirmed, is of particular concern because onion cultivation is far more profitable than aja cultivation. Motor pump users greatly appreciate the benefits of onion cultivation that has been achieved through motor pump irrigation. They expressed their concern by emphasizing that, \"if water is available, cultivating onions is more beneficial.\"The increasing competition for water threatens the sustainability of motor pump irrigation and diminishes the livelihoods of motor pump users. In addition, it affects traditional schemes by reducing the amount of water available for traditional irrigation. For instance, farmers who practice traditional irrigation in the downstream portions of the Alemayehu River insist that the expansion of motor pump use in the upstream areas has reduced the flow of water to their area, thereby jeopardizing their mesno irrigation. In Alem Ber, farmers who irrigate by diverting water from the Aguwa-Dibor River described a case of conflict between motor pump use and mesno irrigation, whereby motor pump users are alleged to be blocking water and stopping its flow to the mesno waterway. They explained that this situation was threatening their onion cultivation, but the blockage was later removed through the intervention of a kebele official. Also, in Dibasifatira, farmers using mesno by diverting water from the Nachurit River described a situation of conflict between traditional irrigation and motor pump irrigation. They stated that some motor pump users surreptitiously remove weir structures and redirect water to the river, so that more water flows through the branch of the stream from which they pump water and irrigate fields. Key informants indicated that this kind of sabotage often takes place at night and it has forced mesno users, during their turns of water allocation, to be vigilant against such activities that jeopardize their water share and irrigation schedule.In some instances, the competition between motor pump use and traditional irrigation becomes more complex at the ground level. This is related to situations where a farmer who owns a motor pump may also be involved in traditional irrigation.A key informant in Dibasifatira indicated that, at times, some of these users resort to using their motor pumps through covert interference with traditional schemes. Such motor pump owners, like other motor pump users, consider motor pumps as a means of 'avoiding' the 'inconvenience' of traditional irrigation. Interviews with some irrigation users clearly reflected this situation. For instance, an irrigation user in Billa stated that, \"mesno is less convenient, because we use it by worefa (water use turns). When worefa takes longer, I prefer to use \"motor\" (i.e., motor pump).\" Similarly, another irrigation user stated that, \"If you get 'motor' , you do not expect to wait for worefa to access water. You will have easy access to water by using the 'motor'.\"Thus, motor pump irrigation has led to increasing competition for water use even within mesnos, potentially undermining their institutional arrangements. The growing shortage of water threatens their sustainability. Competition and conflict are increasing between motor pump irrigation and traditional irrigation. The reduction in water supply for traditional irrigation puts its users at a disadvantage. The end result is becoming a lose-lose situation for users of both types of irrigation. We anticipate the situation will worsen and become more widespread over time, if unabated.To date, there has been little institutional response at the kebele level in terms of institutional arrangements to guide motor pump irrigation and ensure its sustainability. However, information obtained from Kokit kebele indicated that a kind of 'committee' was reportedly attempted in one village. However, its function was limited to mediating a conflict over land. As a key informant in Kokit explained, \"Someone pumping out water might want to bring the water to his field by trespassing another person's land, thereby creating a conflict with the landowner. The committee tried to mediate such conflicts over land. This was tried only in our village.\"However, there are important government institutional and policy contexts that recognize the importance of appropriate use and management of water resources. A key government policy document, the GTP, has emphasized the importance of irrigation development and improved water utilization, as well as building the capacities of farmers and government support structures. Associated key documents of the Ministry of Water Resources, such as the Water Resources Management Policy (MoWR 1998) and the Water Sector Strategy (MoWR 2001), have also identified the importance of developing irrigation and appropriate institutional structures for the implementation and management of irrigated agriculture. In 2013, the government issued a \"Proclamation to Provide for the Establishment of Irrigation Water User Association\" (FDRE 2013). Such institutional and policy provisions and enactments can have their own implications in terms of facilitating a context for the creation of local institutional solutions for pump-based irrigation. There is also a wider governmentinitiated institutional context whereby rural people have been mobilized for watershed management activities. Information obtained from the woreda agriculture office in Fogera described watershed management as an important part of its natural resource management agenda. Farmers have been engaged in collective soil and water conservation activities through woreda and kebele structures, and watershed management task forces which are organized from the village through to kebele levels. Nevertheless, so far, there has been little direct official response to the growing shortages of water in small rivers resulting from the expansion of motor pump irrigation.Until recently, irrigation investments in Asia and Africa consisted almost entirely of public investments; although farmers did invest in small-scale individual and community-managed irrigation schemes, these investments were invisible to governments. Colonial governments invested in large-scale schemes based on canals, barrages and dams, especially in South Asia, Sudan, West Africa and South Africa. The main exception was public support for the rehabilitation of small community-managed 'traditional' irrigation schemes in Asia. These types of investments continued in the postcolonial period, and were scaled up in conjunction with the Green Revolution in Asia. However, from the 1980s, there was growing public and private dissatisfaction with the performance of public irrigation schemes. Quietly and almost invisibly, beginning in the 1950s in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and elsewhere, individual farmers began investing in motor pumps. A report on treadle pumps published in 2000 was an eyeopener with its title, \"Pedaling out of poverty\" (Shah et al. 2000). However, it soon became clear that the real story was not so much about treadle pumps, but about the low-cost portable pumps that came onto the market in the 1990s.Initially, these were mostly powered by petrol or diesel. More recently, with rural electrification, the use of electric pumps became more common in Asia; and most recently, solar pumps are coming onto the market in South Asia and at least at an experimental level in West Africa (Shah et al. 2007;Tewari 2012;Burney et al. 2010).By the mid-2000s, the area under private irrigation constituted over 60% of India's irrigation, exceeding the area under public schemes despite continued public investments (Mukherji et al. 2009). In SSA, motor pump irrigation got off to a slower start, but is now also growing rapidly in many countries (Shah et al. 2013). In some African countries, for example, Ghana, the area under private small-scale irrigation now greatly exceeds the area under public irrigation (Villholth 2013). African governments have become interested in supporting this expansion: private pump-based irrigation does not require long lead times and huge outlays of public funds; it mobilizes significant private investment; and it is making important contributions to the food supply of growing cities as well as to agricultural exports.The significant impacts of pump-based irrigation in terms of poverty reduction and higher agricultural productivity are also impressive in both Asia and Africa (e.g., Shah et al. 2007Shah et al. , 2013;;Mukherji et al. 2009;Burney and Naylor 2012;de Fraiture and Giordano 2014). However, as with all good things, the rise of individually owned pump-based irrigation has led to new problems. In parts of western and southern India, northern China and North America, over-pumping of groundwater has led to serious depletion of both shallow and deeper aquifers (on the other hand, shallow aquifers that are annually recharged by monsoon rains continue to be under-exploited in eastern India). Recent research in SSA finds that groundwater remains an under-exploited resource in most places, but there is growing evidence of over-exploitation and degradation of, and conflict over, groundwater resources (e.g., Villholth 2013).In addition to groundwater, vast areas of the semiarid and humid tropic zones of SSA are characterized by the existence of multiple small streams and rivers. In the driest areas, these are ephemeral; in nearly all of them, their flows vary dramatically between the wet and dry seasons. With a few possible local exceptions, data on the locations and flows of these streams are nonexistent. Indeed, recent estimates on the potential for motor pump irrigation focus entirely on groundwater and ignore the potential for pumping from small streams (e.g., Namara et al. 2013).As pump irrigation expands in SSA, it seems highly likely that competition for water from small streams and rivers as well as aquifers will become increasingly serious. This problem will require creative solutions at local levels.India, China and North America have experimented with institutional and technological approaches for managing the problem of aquifer mining. In North America, the Ogallala Aquifer Initiative supports a range of measures to reduce depletion of a major source of agricultural water, including encouraging conservation agriculture, more efficient irrigation and changes in cropping patterns 5 . Other measures include systems of enforceable permits for water extraction and spacing of pumps, pump metering, promoting community-based and even larger-scale groundwater recharging (e.g., Gujarat, India), and reconfiguration of rural electricity systems that separate supplies for domestic and industrial purposes, and supplies using dedicated lines to agricultural pumps. In the latter case, electricity supply for agriculture is highly reliable but rationed (Shah et al. 2004;Mukherji et al. 2009). It is likely that some parts of Asia have evolved approaches to dealing with competition on small rivers, but these are not well documented.African and South Asian countries need to be cautious about adopting solutions that work under different conditions. Shah and van Koppen (2006) argue that the promotion of integrated water resources management models, borrowed from wealthier countries with more developed economies and institutions, has done more harm than good in countries where the vast majority of water users are very small-scale and operate in an informal economic and institutional context. In other words, it is important to understand \"what works on the ground and what does not, and devise indirect policy instruments to encourage or compel private institutional arrangements to meet public policy goals.\" (ibid.) Their argument is basically an evolutionary one: in countries where most water management arrangements are local and informal, governments have a limited capacity to influence these; they should, therefore, try to create a policy environment that encourages the evolution of effective local institutional arrangements, but also focuses direct interventions only on large-scale water users. Their argument is also cautionary: we cannot assume that direct interventions -social engineering -by the government or NGOs are feasible responses to the problems created by the motor pump revolution in Africa.Motor pump irrigation is beginning to revolutionize irrigated agriculture and rural development in SSA, in much the same ways as it has done in Asia. As in Asia, it is likely to enable millions of smallholder farmers to create wealth and move out of poverty, while also contributing to non-farm rural development as well as national economic growth. It is also likely to create a new generation of problems related to the management of and equitable access to scarce water resources, as it has in many parts of Asia. This is still an emerging issue in SSA, though it is already taking shape in some localized areas, including the Fogera case. We argue that the root of the problem is that, while traditional communitymanaged irrigation is perceived by both farmers and governments as having both technical and social dimensions, motor pump irrigation is viewed largely as a technological innovation. This narrow focus on technology repeats an earlier error committed by governments and donors promoting small-scale irrigation. Researchers and governments have focused on one institutional dimension: the need for an effective supply chain for pumps, spare parts and maintenance services; and markets for agricultural products. However, the need for institutional measures to guide pump-based irrigation and manage common water resources, such as small rivers and streams, remains a blind spot.L o c a l u s e r s ' i n v o l v e m e n t a n d accomplishments in traditional irrigation reveal their experiences with collective action and their understanding of traditional irrigation as a social undertaking. The events that unfolded following the spread of motor pump irrigation is a result of over-reliance on a technological perspective, disregarding the social requirements of irrigation. If governments and farmers continue along this path, it will generate increasingly serious and intractable conflicts among users, concentration of resources in the hands of the more powerful local elites and ultimately serious degradation of a valuable resource. The impacts will go beyond agriculture and food security: shallow aquifers are a major source of domestic water in rural Africa, and indeed some governments, including that of Ethiopia, encourage \"self-supply\" of domestic water using pumps as an alternative to community-managed water supplies (Butterworth et al. 2013).What can be done? We view the problem as a socio-technical issue in an integrated landscape context. There is growing evidence of positive outcomes of integrated landscape initiatives in SSA and elsewhere (Milder et al. 2014). While we are skeptical of the efficacy of direct government intervention in such complex local issues, there is considerable evidence that people can find creative institutional solutions for local resource management problems with facilitation and policy support from the government and NGOs (e.g., Komakech and van der Zaag 2011;Komakech 2013;Merrey and Cook 2012). More specifically, the promotion and facilitation of \"innovation platforms\", forums that include a wide range of stakeholders with shared interests, can enable people to identify a problem and potential solutions, test the possible solutions and implement them more widely if they work (Nederlof et al. 2011;Tenywa et al. 2011;Kilelu et al. 2013;Duncan 2011) 6 .In this case, such a platform might include the farmers pumping water from a shared stream or aquifer, local water and agricultural officials, wholesalers of agricultural products, and pump suppliers. All of these parties have a strong interest in the sustainable management of the common resource. Facilitators (who may be local extension agents, for example) can introduce solutions that have been tried elsewhere, and encourage discussion of how to share the limited water resources sustainably and equitably while also maximizing its productivity.Encouraging the adaptation of institutional arrangements already used in other contexts to this new problem may also be effective. Transparent participatory monitoring of pumping and streamflow or aquifer levels can provide the information needed on the scale of the problem and trends over time. Depending on local conditions, local governments or communitybased organizations can play a critical role in this process of monitoring, raising awareness and proposing solutions. Effective solutions will be context-specific: what works well in one country or even within a watershed in the same country may not be the best solution in another. Some governments may be tempted to try to limit the number of pumps through licensing or regulations based on their location and capacity. There is very little evidence from developing countries that such direct interventions have been successful. However, this may work where local governments are effective and have adequate resources. As rural electrification expands in the future, more opportunities may arise to use electricity management as a means of rationing of pumping as done in Gujarat, India. We recommend that governments should play a leading role in raising awareness among pump users and facilitating local problem solving.Finally, further research can contribute greatly to promoting and sustaining motor pump-irrigated agriculture and its benefits. First, there is an urgent need to carry out more localized and detailed assessments of both aquifers and small streams: their locations, estimated flows or yields, aquifer recharge rates, water quality, and both the threats and opportunities affecting their sustained use. Second, we suggest that researchers carry out detailed multi-disciplinary case studies in areas where motor pump irrigation is expanding rapidly to identify emerging problems and responses, complemented by more extensive comparative studies, in order to understand the scale of over-use of common water resources. Evidence of the scale of the problem is critical to get the attention of policymakers. Third, returning to our theme of 'institutional creativity' discussed above, we would encourage participatory actionoriented research and experimentation in places such as Fogera to identify how external agents can best facilitate the emergence of local social arrangements or adaptation of existing institutional arrangements to address a new problem. Solutions cannot be imposed; they must emerge from recognition of the problem and agreeing to test solutions on the ground."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2139966908.json b/main/part_2/2139966908.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..58299a2a1214af7b84f9e61a9bba4a75414b9a5f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2139966908.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c91662e1ff959baa9209e86801a127cd","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/16030a9b-22c7-4591-b2c6-c57c8b005d35/content","id":"556354942"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c5bb9160-8721-481a-a4da-6c61b73e97b8","content":"CIMMYT -the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center -is the global leader in publicly-funded maize and wheat research and related farming systems. Headquartered near Mexico City, CIMMYT works with hundreds of partners throughout the developing world to sustainably increase the productivity of maize and wheat cropping systems, thus improving global food security and reducing poverty. CIMMYT is a member of the CGIAR System and leads the CGIAR Research Programs on Maize and Wheat and the Excellence in Breeding Platform. The Center receives support from national governments, foundations, development banks and other public and private agencies.drought tolerant germplasm, intercropping, tree fallows, water harvesting and irrigation technologies. These practices all aim at increasing productivity and incomes of smallholder farming systems and address the adaptation and mitigation components to varying extents (Descheemaeker et al., 2016;Steward et al., 2018). Conservation Agriculture (Kassam et al., 2009), is one such practice that has received considerable research attention as a climate smart technology in Malawi in the last two decades. However, many other practices such as Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration that seek to reverse the widespread vegetation degradation have also been recently the focus of research. Agroforestry has been one of the common CSA practices in Malawi. The high cost of mineral fertilizers in cropping systems have also necessitated the widespread use of nitrogen fixing legumes and organic manures (composts) as strategies for alleviating nutrient deficits in cropping systems. Using agroforestry technologies can help to maintain soil cover, improve nutrient levels, increase soil organic matter, water infiltration, and provides a secondary source of food, fodder, fibre and fuel.The Protecting Ecosystems and Restoring Forests in Malawi (PERFORM) project was designed as the flagship implementation vehicle for the Enhancing Capacity for Low Emission Development Strategies (EC-LEDS) partnership between the United States Government (USG) and the Government of Malawi (GoM), and as a core component of environment programming under USAID/Malawi's Development Objective Assistance Agreement with the GoM. The main goal for PERFORM's five-year engagement was to make a lasting improvement in Malawian quality of life. To do that, PERFORM aligned with Malawi's Growth and Development Strategy to promote forest conservation and green growth In line with this purpose, prioritized intervention activities in Machinga district and in communities around Liwonde included forest restoration, Climate-Smart Agriculture, Intensification (more output per unit area), low-cost irrigation systems where applicable and soil fertilityenhancing measures, diversified farming systems, and Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) relates to agricultural practices and approaches hinged on three overlapping pillars or components i.e. improved productivity, adaptation and mitigation of climate change (Figure 1). CSA (https://ccafs.cgiar.org/climate-smartagriculture-0#.WJ_L4E27ocM) is defined as an integrative approach that addresses the interlinked challenges of food security and climate change, and explicitly aim at the three objectives:1. sustainably increasing agricultural productivity, to support equitable increases in farm incomes, food security and development;2. adapting and building resilience of agricultural and food security systems to climate change at multiple levels; and 3. reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture (including crops, livestock and fisheries).A wide range of crop and livestock practices can contribute to these three CSA pillars and include practices or technologies such as such as agroforestry or fertilizer tree systems, conservation agriculture, To assess climate smartness, relevant key indicators are often used to evaluate the contribution of such technologies to the three CSA pillars. For example, yield income and food security can be used as proxies for sustainable productivity while a range of soil quality indicators such as microbial activity, soil organic carbon, water infiltration, soil loss, nitrogen content, pH and other soil chemical properties are used to assess resilience attributes of the CSA practice. For mitigation, measures such as the greenhouse gases emissions (CO 2 , CH 4 fluxes), above ground biomass, total soil carbon (t/ha) and fuelwood consumption are often used.Measurement of biomass inputs in cropping systems for example, is important for the purpose of understanding annual carbon injection and thus a good indice for above ground biomass production. In CA systems, provision of residue cover usually derived from crop biomass inputs, is important and one of the three key principles of CA. FAO recommends that farmers have at least 30% residue cover at the time of seeding but most farmers in Southern Africa hardly meet this limit due to competing uses of the residues as livestock feed, fuel and other uses (Valbuena et al., 2012). Residue cover also plays an important role in reducing rainfall erosivity as the energy of rain drops is attenuated by the presence of residues on the surface. Residue cover and water infiltration rate related parameters could thus be used as indicators for resilience of CSA systems.The objective of this study was therefore to quantify the costs and benefits of three CSA cropping practices in Machinga district with respect to productivity, adaptation and mitigation indicators among farmers voluntarily employing these technologies. Specifically, the study evaluated the following attributes as CSA performance indicators:• Assess the annual biomass, residue cover and water infiltration capacities as proxies for mitigation and resilience• Assess soil quality changes with respect to soil physical and chemical properties of fields under CSA practices• Assess the yield merits of implemented CSA practices relative to conventional farmer practices as proxies for productivity assessments• Establish if the measured soil quality and yield merits are influenced by household socioconomic characteristics of targeted households.improved access to quality planting material and seeds. These technologies implemented as pilot activities, were also envisaged to contribute towards national efforts for reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+) readiness under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.CIMMYT, and many other partners have been implementing CA as one of CSA practices in Malawi for many years. Most of these studies however assessed the performance of CA technologies when implemented as trials or field experiments and not when farmers implemented these technologies on their own. Under the PERFORM project, farmers were recommended to try out new improved drought and heat stress tolerant maize varieties as part of the suite of CSA technologies. The high cost of mineral fertilizers also necessitated the use of a local fertilizer innovation involving the combination of organic manures and conventional mineral inorganic NPK and Urea fertilizers to produce a popular fertilizer known as \"MBEYA\". This \"MBEYA\" fertilizer was considered by farmers as a very useful fertilizer enabling more efficient use of limited quantities of mineral fertilizers. Not much is available from literature on this technology despite its popularity.The use of pigeonpea as an intercrop in maize systems is also increasingly seen as an important climate smart and food security strategy. This arises from the fact that pigeonpea, being a deep rooted and high biomass producing legume, can generate significant soil cover levels during the cropping season after the maize has senesced and can relay well in maize systems and fix substantial amounts of nitrogen during the period (April-June) when the rainfall season is tailing off. Pigeonpea therefore makes a highly compatible intercrop in maize systems. Pigeonpea has also been promoted as an important cash crop that could potentially be used to generate income for the smallholders and improve their market participation. However, the pigeonpea export market in India collapsed in the last two years thereby leaving many farmers who produced this pulse crop somehow stranded with unsold grain stocks and no market. Yet the maize-pigeonpea intercrop system answers well to the CSA pillars as it could improve productivity and incomes, enhance adaptation and resilience through diversification and through high biomass production and it could contribute to the mitigation component. Following a reconnaissance visit to Machinga Agricultural Development Division (ADD) in September 2018 the CIMMYT team in collaboration with key stakeholders in the PERFORM project identified CA, pigeonpea intercropping and the MBEYA fertilization strategy as the most widely used CSA rainfed cropping technologies in communities around the Liwonde Forest Reserve.Five communities in which the PERFORM project had been implemented since 2014, were selected for in-depth studies on biophysical parameters. The five communities were Lower Ntubwi, Mbonechera, Upper Ntubwi, Domasi and Nsanama. It is noteworthy that Nsanama was only sampled for the yield assessments. Farmers using CA, pigeon pea intercrops and the MBEYA fertilization strategy were selected for in-depth studies with the help of local field officers and lead farmers.On every farm, a field with the targeted technology was identified for sampling while another control field without the technology was also identified within the same farm (Table 1). Special considerations were given to allow for equal sampling of fields in the high and low rainfall communities. Due to its widespread use, more farmers using CA were identified for sampling compared to those sampled for pigeonpea and MBEYA fertilization technologies. Other factors considered in sampling the study fields, were duration of implementing the technologies (2 years or less, or a longer period) and soil texture (light and heavy textured soils).Measurement of biomass input in cropping systems is important for the purpose of understanding annual carbon injection as a measure or proxy of climate change mitigation. The amount of biomass available for incorporation into the soil or left on the soil surface as cover at the end of the dry winter season in southern Africa's cropping systems can be a good proxy to how much carbon is returned to the soil system annually leading to carbon sequestration (Govaerts et al., 2009;Kell, 2011;Lal, 2004;Palm et al., 2014). However, measuring biomass inputs may be a tedious exercise, therefore visual estimates of percentages of residue cover are often used in CA systems.In this study, annual biomass inputs after the dry winter season were made by randomly placing a 0.70m*0.70m quadrant made of wood or wire on the ground and collecting all biomass at the surface into a khaki bag and weighing it using a precision scale.In each plot measurements were made three times thereby giving a total of six observations on each farm: 3 in the CSA technology and 3 in the conventional non-CSA technology. The dry residues were weighed and the type of residues available on the surface were also recorded. Because measurements were done after a prolonged hot and dry period, we assumed the residues were air dry.Similarly residue cover estimates were also made through visual observations in each plot and data recorded on a datasheet for each farm using the photo comparison method (Shelton et al., 1995) to estimate residue cover. By visually observing the ground and comparing it to the photos, percentage of residue cover for each quadrant was estimated.The time to pond technique is a quick and rapid but reliable technique for comparing water infiltration characteristics on cropping systems managed in different ways. With this technique differences in water infiltration patterns are evaluated by measuring the time taken for sprinkled water to flow out of a ring of about 50cm diameter. The device has a provision for measuring volume of water infiltrated and the time it takes for the applied infiltrating water to start flowing laterally and hit the ring. The amount of time this takes depends on how well water infiltrates into the soil.The longer this takes, the better. This technique was recently improved by agronomists at CIMMYT-Harare to reduce subjectivity of results caused by different water pouring intensities when different individuals use the technique. With the improved technique, water drops from a funnel which is a fixed distance from the ground across all measurements. In this study all measurements were conducted with the water delivery funnel set at 45 cm above ground and three runs were conducted per plot. Some simple household data from each farm including soil type and household size, were collected for each of the three focal technologies: CA, pigeon pea and the Mbeya Fertilization technology.Composite soil samples were collected from the top 20 cm of each of the two fields on each farm. Samples were randomly collected with a shovel on at least 10 random but evenly distributed positions on each field and then mixed up to make one composite sample per cropping system on each farm. Collected samples were air dried and then sent to Bvumbwe Agricultural Research Station laboratory for analysis. Standard laboratory procedures were used to analyse for soil physical properties such as texture. Similarly, standard procedures were used for the analysis of soil chemical properties such as pH, N, P, K, %OC, %SOC, POMP and others.Yield assessments were carried out at the end of the 2018/19 season including some on farms where previous data was collected on water infiltration and for which laboratory soil analysis had been carried out in Oct and Nov 2018. Maize yields were physically measured on farmers' fields where CA, MBEYA and Pigeonpea technologies had been employed and measurements were made on both the CSA and the control non-CSA technology fields within the same farm. A total of 64 farmers (Table 2) were sampled for the yield assessments despite the initial target of 80 as some of the farmers harvested their fields before arrival of the yield assessment team. A list of farmers from the initial soil sampling was used for the selections in each of the five communities. For each farm and in each of the two fields on each farm, 4 checkplots (5m*4 rows) for crop cuts were randomly chosen in the CSA intervention plot and on the non-CSA intervention plots close by and within the same farm (Figure 2).Annual biomass, residue cover and water infiltration data (time to pond and water intake) were assembled for each of the farmers and analysed using t-tests for comparison of means comparing CSA and the corresponding control non-CSA technology for the CA, pigeonpea intercrops and Mbeya fertilization strategy. To analyse the contribution of factors such as agro-ecology, soil texture and associated basic socioeconomic attributes for each farm, a Linear Model in R-stats was applied since the distribution of these factors was unbalanced for each community.Similarly soil chemical and yield data were subjected to analyses using the same models as above. Since there was no measured rainfall data for the sites, gridded rainfall data from NASA (https://power.larc.nasa.gov/ data) were used for sites that had GPS coordinates for a 30 year period up to 2018/19. Cumulative seasonal rainfall data for the 30 years were used to compute a normal rainfall mean for the area. Using this mean a t-test comparing the season 2018/19 total rainfall from the known 30 yr. mean was used to establish if the last season 2018/19 had significantly deviated from the mean. Finally, the analysis combined socioeconomic attributes to yield attributes to test if there are any socioeconomic variables that were associated with the observed yields and their differences relative to the conventional farmer practices Results from the studies show that the average annual biomass inputs from the CSA cropping systems amounted to 3,400, 2,900 and 3,800 kg/ha for CA, MBEYA fertilization strategy and pigeonpea intercrops, respectively (Figure 3.1 a). There were no significant differences between the annual biomass inputs in the CA and MBEYA systems compared to conventional practices. However, the pigeonpea intercrops showed significantly higher biomasses and better infiltration (higher time-topond) compared to conventional monocrop systems (Figure 3.1 b). Although positive, differences between CSA and non-CSA technologies in residue cover, and water intake were mostly not significant.The results therefore suggest that the pigeonpea systems which had high biomass inputs also contributed to the better water infiltration as reflected in the higher time to pond (Figure 3.1. b).T-test results analysing the different soil quality attributes are presented in Table 3.1. CA showed relatively better and statistically significant (P<0.05) soil quality attributes except for soil pH. In comparison to the conventional cropping systems, the increases varied between 39 and 201% (Table 3.1). Thus both easily degradable and protected particulate organic matter (POMR and POMP) were much higher in CA compared to conventional farmer practices and increased by 195 and 201%, respectively. Consequently, the soil organic carbon measured in the top 20cm of the soil averaged 0.71% for conventional practices compared to 1.06% under CA giving a net increase of 48%. With respect to compaction and bulk density, CA also portrayed more positive attributes with significantly higher (P<0.0001) compaction and bulk density being measured on conventional farmer practices compared to CA. Thus, CA had lower bulk densities of 1,280 compared to 1,330kg/m 3 under the conventional practices. No significant differences were however observed in soil pH. Similarly, the MBEYA fertilization strategy also had positive and better soil quality characteristics than conventional till with organic carbon increasing from 1.07% to 1.58% (Table 3.2). The highest relative advantages were noted under the POMR (141%) and POMP (164%) The MBEYA fertilization strategy thus contributed to improved soil organic carbon status and better soil nutrient characteristics. The strategy was thus contributing to improved soil fertility despite the challenges of preparing this organic fertilizer. Differences in soil pH were also not significant as for the CA systems.Pigeonpea systems also had significant positive increases on organic carbon (OC) (42%), Particulate organic matter POMR (167%), POMP (120%), Magnesium (54%), Ca (98%), Potassium (74%), Phosphorus (49%) and Nitrogen (26%) compared to conventional monocrops while differences in soil pH were not apparent (Table 3.3). Thus, in general the pigeonpea intercrop systems brought about significant improvements in soil quality attributes.With respect to the pigeonpea systems, soil pH remained insignificant when comparing mono and intercropped systems. However, all other soil attributes for pigeonpea intercrops were more positive than for maize monocropping as most of the differences were positive and significant (p<0.05). Bulk density differences were also not significant but there was significantly less compaction in the pigeonpea intercrop fields compared to the monocropped ones. Thus in general the pigeonpea intercrop system brought about significant improvements in soil quality attributes. Overall, across all the practices (CA, Mbeya and pigeon pea) soil pH was the same and didn't show an improvement as their relative advantages were not significant at P< 0.05. The most significant relative advantages were observed under POMR and POMP across all the systems. Most of the soil chemical attributes proved to better under the climate-smart agriculture practice as compared to the conventional practice. Overall the results suggest the three CSA systems contribute 4.2, 6.0 and 5.3 tC/ha from the CA, MBEYA and pigeonpea intercrops systems, respectively (Table 3.4).The average 30-year total annual rainfall for the five communities amounted to 1,160 mm versus 1,593 mm received in the 2018/19 season in which yields were assessed (Figure 4). Statistical analyses suggested the 2018/19 season was significantly wetter than the normal average for the area. Out of this the rainfall analysis suggested that the in-crop rainfall total (Nov.-April) amounted to 1,076 mm versus 1,522 mm received in 2018/19. The major differences arose from the floods brought about by Cyclone Idai during which some 470mm were received in March. Thus the season did not suffer from any serious moisture deficits for crops since there was excessive rainfall compared to the normal. By comparing the season onset to the reported dates of planting by the farmers, no delays in planting dates were apparent and hence farmers efficiently utilized the first opportunity availed by the rains to plant their crops.The three CSA systems combined, significantly improved maize yields as shown in the box plots (Figure 5.1, p.8) compared to the conventional farmer practices. Climate-smart agriculture technologies had average maize grain yields of 3,834 kg/ha as compared to the conventional practice with a mean of 2,916 kg/ ha. When compared across agro-ecologies (high and low rainfall areas), results showed the same general pattern with CSA performing better than conventional. The CSA systems had a mean of 3,965 compared to 3,049 kg/ha under conventional in high rainfall areas while in the low rainfall areas CSA had a mean of 3,595 kg/ha compared to 2,675 kg/ha in low rainfall areas.The results provided solid evidence that CSA increased yields compared to the conventional system (farmer practice) at least in the 2018/19 season, a result that echoes well with sentiments expressed by farmers.On separating and analysing the three CSA systems (CA, MBEYA and pigeonpea intercrops), the yield responses under the three practices i.e. CA, Mbeya and pigeonpea intercrops are shown in Figure 5.2.From this, the CA practice performed significantly better (P=0.016) with a mean maize yield of 4,106 kg/ha compared to the conventional with a mean of 2,713 kg/ha equivalent to 51% increase. Similarly, the Mbeya fertilization strategy also increased mean maize yields by 19% compared to the normal conventional fertilization (non-Mbeya) at 4,535 compared to 3,793 kg/ha, respectively but the differences were statistically not significant (p=0.571). Maize yields in the pigeonpea intercrop system were insignificantly higher than that from the monocrop maize (p=0.735) at a mean of 3,047 versus 2,802 kg/ha, respectively, a 9% increase.The positive yield responses from CA are attributed to the improved soil quality characteristics observed under CA which included better organic carbon, higher nutrient content (N, P, K) and lower bulk densities.3.4. Agronomic practices: varieties, residue application, planting density and weeding effects.Across the three CSA systems, key agronomic factors that significantly (p<0.05) influenced yield included residue application (Figure 5.3.), plant population (Figure 5.3.) and number of weeding (Figure 5.4.) carried out per season. Plant population had a significant and positive linear regression effect on maize yield (P<0.0000); R 2 =0.144 with peak yields at about 44,000 plants per ha (Figure 5.3). Low yields were mostly associated with low plant populations.Weeding was an important and significant factor influencing yields in CA systems where the number of weeding cycles per season significantly correlated to maize grain yield. Yield penalties were evident from not weeding at all while weeding two or three times, resulted in improved yields. The majority of farmers weeded their crop twice per season. On average under CA, returns to weeding amounted to 1,098 kg/ha/ weeding run thereby suggesting that investments in weeding by farmers could give them labor investments returns of at least 1 tonne of grain for every weeding run (Figure 5.4). Farmers were found to be growing varieties from more than 20 different seed companies. These varieties included drought tolerant and non-drought tolerant ones (Figure 5.5). The most widely grown varieties were DKC8033, MH33 and SC627 from three different companies. Figure 5.5 shows that newly released variety like Peacock-10, ZM523, MH26 are slowly penetrating the market compared to DKC 8033 which has been on the market for more than 10 years. PERFORM in collaboration with the USAID-funded MISST project had for the past 3 seasons demonstrated these different DTM varieties and it is pleasing to see a number of farmers now taking up these varieties. It is important for farmers to replace old varieties with new improved ones which are more tolerant to diseases and climate change.Yield performance was also evaluated based on sex of the household head. Results generally suggested male-headed households had higher yields compared to female-headed ones. Chi-square analysis also suggested a significant positive association between resource endowment and maturity of CSA implementation (p=0.013). Experience in CA was categorised into two major groups namely, junior and mature. Most of the farmers (out of a total of 19) who were mature in practicing CA technologies, were also relatively wealthy while the junior CA implementers were mostly resource constrained (Table 3.5). However, results also showed no special correlations or associations between annual biomass inputs, time to pond and water intake characteristics and resource endowment or wealth status of households..The findings of this study align well with other previous studies on CSA which have shown that such technologies make significant contributions to productivity and resilience pillars of CSA (Steward et al., 2018). For example, studies in the Southern Africa region have shown that technologies such as CSA result in yield increments of up to 50% (Nyagumbo, et al., 2016). In this study where farmers implemented the technologies on their own and not as trials or experiments, the results give a close reflection of practical realities of possible achievements when farmers implement these technologies on their own. The conclusively positive soil quality benefits suggest that these CSA technologies have long term impacts on resilience and hence yield outcomes (Michler, 2015;Pittelkow et al., 2015). Some of the sampled farmers had implemented CSA technologies for more than six years and hence the positive soil health attributes measured. Yet the technologies don't seem to have any apparent effects on pH (Bayala et al., 2012;Bai et al., 2018).The yield increases observed from CA systems in this study amounted to 51% compared to conventional farmer practices and clearly show the extent to which CA practices can potentially help to address food security challenges and resilience of farmers.The newly introduced local MBEYA fertilization innovation resulted in 19% yield increases but due to a small sample size (14 farms) the differences were not significant statistically. This suggests there is need to look more elaborately into this technology and properly evaluate its potential crop yield benefits. Not much information was available from literature on this technology. The modest yield increases (9%) from the intercrop systems also generally agree with many other findings on intercropped maize in the region which show that maize yield tends to get depressed in intercropped systems ((Bahareh et al., 2009;Ngwira et al., 2012;Rusinamhodzi et al., 2017Rusinamhodzi et al., , 2012;;Nyagumbo et al., 2016). However, the combined benefit of this intercropping practice lies in the additional legume output that also enables farmers to diversify food and income sources and so the total output from this system is usually much higher than the monocrops. Furthermore, the measured enhanced annual biomass inputs, increased water infiltration characteristics and soil carbon and nutrient contents observed, all point towards a more sustainable, resilient and productive cropping system. However, a shortcoming of this study is that it only evaluated the performance of the CSA technologies with respect to their maize yield merits and did not measure legume yields from pigeonpea for example. Consequently, the full productivity benefits, particularly the diversification benefits, were not fully assessed in this maize yield assessment. The results also suggest the need to address gender in-equalities as female-headed households were found to be less productive compared to the maleheaded households across both CSA and non-CSA technologies while those with mature CA also turned out to be more resource endowed. We however could not establish the cause-effect relationship of this significant association to conclusively ascertain if use of the CSA technologies studied was singly responsible for the better resource endowment of those households.The three CSA technologies evaluated in this study positively addressed the CSA pillars in different respects. With respect to productivity, CA (51%) and the MBEYA strategy (19%) resulted in higher maize yields and this could help to contribute to improved food security and livelihoods. Although pigeonpea intercrops did not improve maize yields compared to the monocrops, the total output from this system (maize + legume) would give the farmers higher benefits compared to the monocrop systems thereby leading to improved diversification of food sources for the households.With respect to resilience and adaptation, the CSA technologies also resulted in better yields even in a season whose rainfall was way above the normal for this area. CSA systems thus helped farmers overcome the extreme weather conditions characterized by floods experienced in the 2018/19 season. Results from the studies confirmed higher annual biomass inputs and improved water infiltration from the pigeonpea intercrops. Particulate organic matter, soil organic carbon, Ca, Mg, K, N and P, all significantly improved under the three CSA systems while the soil was also more friable under CSA as evidenced by the measured lower bulk densities on CSA systems. With regards to climate change mitigation, the results obtained in this study suggest the CSA systems could lead to better sequestration of carbon as there was more organic carbon found in soils under CSA, let alone the higher biomass inputs annually from the pigeonpea systems.Given that the CSA technologies assessed in this study were managed by farmers on their own without any external input resources, the results clearly show the superiority of CSA technologies in terms of improving the productivity of cropping systems towards enhanced food security by smallholders in a highly variable climate induced by climate change. Resultsshow that crop fields using CA, MBEYA fertilization and pigeonpea intercrops were more productive and thus food secure than those under conventional tillage systems within the same households. The benefits of such CSA technology investments would naturally be synergized whenever farmers integrated different CSA component technologies into their systems. For example, use of CA, intercrops and MBEYA fertilization along with drought tolerant maize varieties could go a long way in enhancing productivity as compared to when these are applied in isolation.Improved soil quality from CSA systems could also contribute to improved resilience and sustainability in the long run. The higher soil organic carbon in the CSA systems also suggests these systems have scope for mitigating against greenhouse gas emissions since more carbon in the system suggests a higher potential for carbon sequestration and hence improved mitigation.The results from this study therefore suggest that the tested CSA practices effectively address two of the CSA pillars (productivity, resilience/adaptation) and to an unquantified extent, they also contribute to mitigation. Supportive policy environments are therefore required to incentivize smallholder farmers to take up and apply these CSA practices on a relatively larger scale for improved climate smartness. However further studies are required to establish the practical economic feasibility of these CSA innovations so as to further provide evidence-based recommendations on perceived macro-scale benefits of their use. The research hypothesis is that an integrated approach which enhances livelihoods and ecosystem resilience and strengthens forest governance, is practical option to address Liwonde forest deforestation.The link between climate change, forest ecosystems and smallholder farming systems is complex and multifaceted, therefore can be most effectively examined by an integrated socio-ecological approach. This approach provides a holistic methodology to look at reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptation to climate change. Such an approach explicitly promotes multiple objectives linked to vulnerability reduction, sustainable forest ecosystem management, and strengthening livelihood strategies (Brooks et al. 2005). The three principles underlying this study are understanding a) the vulnerability of forest ecosystem services to climate and nonclimate stresses, b) the vulnerability of the farming system due to the loss of forest ecosystem services they depend on and, c) the adaptive capacity of the socio-ecological system as a whole (Figure 1). Another key aspect that this framework focuses on is how governance mechanisms influence the adaptive capacity of vulnerable forest-dependent farmers and communities.In the context of climate change, vulnerability is a function of the character, magnitude and rate of climate variation to which smallholder farming systems and forest ecological systems are exposed, people's sensitivity and their adaptive capacity. Vulnerability is defined as \"the degree to which a system is susceptible to or unable to cope with, adverse effects of climate change, including climate variability and extremes\" (IPCC, 2014; Parry et al. 2004). Vulnerability to climatic shocks is a multi-dimensional concept, encompassing bio-geophysical, economic, institutional and sociocultural factors. Vulnerability is usually considered to be a function of a system's ability to cope with stress and shock. The assessment of vulnerability then includes a measure of exposure to the risk factors and sensitivity to these factors, together comprising the potential impact of such risks, and the capacity to manage and respond to those risks.Figure 1. shows that the risks posed by climate change and extreme weather events are dependent on the interaction of climate-related hazards and sensitivity of both human and natural systems as well as their ability to adapt (Field et al., 2014).Rules/Practice Based on the geo-spatial analysis, observed successful restoration practices implemented by different stakeholders including international and non-governmental organisations and existing institutions and regulations governing sustainable use of forest resources, restoration opportunities in tandem with the communities to implement these were prioritised. The greatest restoration opportunities and proven practices were natural forest management, agricultural technologies (mainly conservation agriculture combined with drought tolerant crop species and varieties), and other agroforestry practices on cropland such as farmermanaged natural regeneration. Smaller opportunities to implement restoration through check dams and contour bunds for erosion control and water harvesting, assisted natural regeneration of degraded forests, promotion of village forests and woodlots, and tree planting and assisted regeneration along stream banks were also collaborated. Villages were purposively selected to represent forest management types, agricultural technologies and other small restoration practices implemented by the project.In each EPA we undertook four focus group discussions with men and women who were actively engaged in at least three technologies promoted by PERFORM except for Mtubwi EPA were six focus group discussion were done due to difference in locations and livelihoods assets. Each focus group comprised 10-12 farmers in gender-separated groups. Village chiefs working together with lead farmers and local total land care officers selected the farmers.A mixed methods approach combining focus group based participatory appraisal tools and semi structured interview, was used to obtain a thorough understanding of the vulnerabilities of the Liwonde forest fringe communities to climate change and assess the efficacy of suites of adaptation options promoted (Marshall et al., 2016).In We carried out 102 individual semi-structured interviews with 44 men and 58 women from the four EPAs. These interviews were designed to elicit information about farmers' understanding of the linkage of climate change, forest ecosystem services and agriculture. We also asked farmers about their history, thematic reasons for engaging in the selected adaptation technologies, forest ecosystem services, production, and management, their experience and perception with Perform promoted technologies. The other purpose of the semi structured interviews was to corroborate information from the forest management and livelihood assets focus group discussions. We complemented the information the interview with onfarm trial long term data to validate farmers' identified and prioritised climate smart agricultural technologies.FGD with a mixture of men and women in Domasi.FGD with Men, Mpungu village. Wrap up meeting with Men and Women at Mpungu village.FGD with Men, Domasi EPA.This section presents the results of communities' perception of forest ecosystem services, agriculture, and climate change linkage in the area, vulnerabilities and adaptation strategies. The respondents from the nine communities demonstrated that they were aware of forest ecosystem services and their importance to agriculture and microclimate as indicated in Table 2. For communities that depended on Lake Chilwa for their livelihood such as Domasi and Nsanama, the respondents expressed very well the importance of forest services for relief rainfall, water regulation and erosion reduction. Respondents from the four communities highlighted that they have observed a positive correlation between deforestation and reduction in rainfall, increase in temperature and siltation of Lake Chilwa (Table 2). The respondents concurred that the greatest impact was felt in 2012 when the lake dried up which was their main source of livelihood. As a matter of fact, records show that the lake has dried completely nine times from 1900 to 2018. Receding and drying events are linked to impacts of extreme weather events characteristic of climate change. These effects are compounded by deforestation and degradation of the catchment leading to soil erosion and siltation. The communities also linked disappearance of tree species with rainfall and seepage reduction.In communities such as Mbonechera, lower and upper Mtubwi where wetlands or dambos played an important role for agricultural production, respondents ranked water regulation in dambos and perennial rivers as the most important forest ecosystem services. Nsanama communities also attributed increase of stream bank cultivation as a major drive of climate change resulting in drying up of the perennial river (Table 2).The climate stressors for forest ecosystem service varied across communities. For communities close to Lake Chilwa, such as Domasi and Nsanama, they linked increased erratic onset of rain, droughts and floods to deforestation and forest ecosystem service reduction (Table 2). For Mbonechera and lower Mtubwi, increased crop failures due to increased frequency of droughts and dry spell were identified as the most important climate stressors of forest ecosystem services. Participants from Domasi, Mbonechara and Nsanama stressed that the shortening of the growing season due to climate change had greatly impacted their livelihoods (Table 2). They reiterated that about a decade ago the season was about five months-long allowing them to produce two crops per season. They would grow maize for food security from November to March then plant beans, pigeon pea or sweet potatoes, as relay crops. Nowadays they rely on a single crop which is bound to fail due to increased frequency of droughts (Table 2). Agricultural productivity and diversification are further compounded by poor soil fertility, increased input costs and land constraints.Only farmers from Mbonechera and Nsanama communities have observed frequency of heat waves and increased disappearance of hydrophilic stress as a result of climate change. Participants from Upper Mtubwi underlined that temperature have become so unpredictable since 2015 (Table 2). They are experiencing cold spells in October which used to be the hottest month. The participants reiterated that this was affecting flowering of some tree species and reproduction of small ruminants and pigs.The main non-climate stressors identified as main drivers of forest ecosystem degradation were population increase, political and economic policy change (Table 2). In all the four communities forest degradation was associated with change from one party state to multiparty state. The change in governments that occurred in 1994 and 2005 were associated with increased forest ecosystem degradation (Table 2). All the four communities concurred that population increase in the 1990s also contributed to increased forest ecosystem degradation. Policy and market failures brought about by political change were also blamed for the poor forest governance. Participants from all the four communities concurred that democracy rendered local institution and formal ineffective. For example, in Domasi, Nsanama and Upper Mtubwi participants could recite how the forest police were ill-treated at a political rally in 2014 and how this resulted in an open access problem. They also reiterated that good policies, project and advocacy efforts which have been implementedPeople walking in Lake Chirwa, as fishing boats lie idle on the dry lake in 2018. Photo by Dr Zacharia .K. Magombo of Malawi Herbaria and Botanical Gardens.in their communities targeted wrong people and socially excluding the charcoal makers. Mbonechera and Nsamana community participants stressed that increased influx of emigrants from known charcoalmaking areas in the southern region contributed significantly to forest degradation. According to the participants' narration, this happened after government change in 2005. The government allocated Likwenu, Milala, Mpelesi estates to people from the rural areas around Blantyre and Zomba, neglecting the local population. This created commons management and land ownership problems. The inhabitants of these two communities felt that these emigrants were benefiting from the forest ecosystem services they had preserved over a long time. Secondly, due to poor integration of the formal and informal institutions, the emigrants were encroaching into the forest designated to these communities (Table 2). The created rivalry in the extraction of the forestry ecosystem services led to rapid depletion. For example, participants from low Mtubwi community stressed that despite having agreed that people would only harvest trees that have dried naturally, they had observed that carpenters in their community would collude with block forest reserve watchmen and debark the type of trees they wanted. For all the nine communities, forest resources are key livelihood assets. In all the communities except Mbonechera firewood and charcoal production were ranked as the most important key resources extracted in the Liwonde forest reserve. According to participants they were the only available economic opportunity and source of income that was easily accessible to all households in the communities. Timber extraction was ranked as the second most important key forest resource in all the communities. Non timber forestry products extraction (NTFPs) was only prominent in Lower Mtubwi and Nsamana communities. The commonly extracted NTFPs were mushrooms and herbs to cure ailments, livestock and poultry diseases.All the communities were aware of forest ecosystem co-management but they perceived the arrangement differently. All the communities had a superficial understanding of co-management and acknowledged that they had a block in the Liwonde reserve forest under their care. In terms of power sharing agreement, the benefits and their responsibilities in managing the blocks, all communities professed ignorance. Each community confirmed that they had a block management committee that represented the community at relevant stakeholder meetings. Though all communities acknowledged improved access to forest resources with the new strategy. They stressed that the current strategy had weakened both the informal and formal institutions that existed leading to pseudo open access problems. Participants from Mbonechera and Lower Mtubwi perceived that the transition from the conventional system of management where government/ forestry department enforcement was the dominant was not well managed. They also presumed that this was further reinforced by the current status whereby most community members perceived that participation in the co-management arrangement was voluntarily.The communities' members also alleged that most people involved in charcoal making as livelihood were socially excluded. It was interesting to note that the participants from Upper Mtubwi concurred with all the other communities. However, they perceived that the incoherence between the informal and formal institution had created the open access problems.Policy failures particularly as it relates to hydro-electric power generation, employment creation and defining democracy were identified in the communities as underlying cause of poor forest reserve governance.Participants form all the communities concurred that both formal and informal institutions enforcement were temporarily deterrents, limited livelihood diversification options and lack of alternative employment opportunities took presidency over the desired long-term impacts of forest protection measures. The Mbonechera and lower Mtubwi communities also highlighted that lack of clarity and understanding of power sharing agreement, benefits and responsibility under the co-management strategy had also increased rivalry in forest extraction. Both communities noted that neighbouring communities from the other side of the mountain were encroaching into their blocks whilst preserving their village lots for future use. They also echoed that because of unclearly stipulated private benefits and responsibility of the comanagement, community members collude to deplete the forest resource in the blocks.The impacts of climate change on forest resources, combined with increased forest management challenges increase the vulnerability of Liwonde forest fringe communities. All the communities around the reserve, revealed that climate change hazards in the form of late onset of rains, increased dry spell, severe droughts and temperature are common phenomena (Tables 4, 5, 6). All the nine communities reiterated that since 1990 severe droughts have been occurring once every three years with 2012 drought being the most devastating (Tables 4, 5, 6). Participants from all the communities also associated the 2012 and 2018 severe droughts with the drying of Lake Chilwa. The lake was the main source of livelihood for more than 50% of the community members, directly as fishermen and irrigation water source, indirectly as market for agricultural produce and forest products in particular charcoal and firewood. Communities in the rain shadow, Mbonechera and Lower Mtubwi have become extremely vulnerable to late on-set of rains, dry spells and severe droughts (Tables 4 and 5). For example, participants from in Mbonechera community echoed that since the year 2000 they have been experiencing an average of 3 dry spells. They also noted that they have observed shortening of the growing season and since the millennium they have never had successful season. The reiterated that every season has it on dynamics it is either those who plant early are able to harvest or those who plant late (Table 4). Land and input access constraints increased their vulnerability, more than 60% of the household could not afford to vary planting dates or varieties due to poverty or land constraints. For communities such as Domasi, agricultural production and forest resources have also been extremely vulnerable to floods (Table 4). The farmers from the nine communities concurred that their communities' vulnerabilities to these climate hazards are further intensified by the interaction of climatic shocks with social, economic, and biophysical 4, 5, 6). For example, in Domasi and Upper Mtubwi community members observed that severe droughts occurred simultaneously with macroeconomic turbulence creating multiple sources of food insecurity (Tables 4 and 5). They reiterated that the severe 2012 drought also coincided with the country's worst economic depression leading to deep poverty and migration of productive member to urban areas and neighbouring countries. They also echoed that the conflation of these shocks with economic depression further undermined private investments in soil fertility improvement contributing to further soil fertility depletion. The Mbonechera, Lowe Mtubwi and Nsanama farmers linked severe droughts to policy and political changes. In particular, 1994, 2012 and 2014 droughts, the community perceived that the effects were worsened by change of government and weakening of the currency resulting in increased maize grain prices (Tables 4, 5, 6).Overall, the nine communities confirmed climate change have profound effects on both natural forest ecosystem and agricultural production. Participants from all the communities emphasised that they had observed changes in climate in the past two decades particularly the current one. These changes included increased heat waves, erratic on-set of rains, increased frequency of dry spell and severe droughts. The communities concurred that the notable severe drought, dry spells and heat wave occurred in 2012, 2016 and 2018 respectively (Tables 4, 5, 6). They also highlighted that climate change has increased vulnerability and reduced resilience of forest ecosystems and agricultural production systems. It was noted that, as a result of frequent severe droughts, the forest ecosystems services, in particular regulation services, are becoming more vulnerable and their long-term adaptation capacity is decreasing drastically. While impact on agricultural systems varied across communities, it was generally observed that increased temperatures, shortening of the growing season and increased frequency of severe droughts had resulted in loss of important tree species and biodiversity resulting in disruption of ecosystem services such as wetlands for agriculture (Tables 4, 5, 6). In Mbonechera and Domasi communities it was highlighted that loss of wetlands had decreased agricultural incomes by up to 50%.For all these forest fringe communities, forest resources represent their key livelihood asset to adapt to climate change impacts. They also revealed that forest ecosystem services have the potential to support their communities' adaptation to the impacts of climate change through micro climates, water regulation services and strengthening livelihood opportunities -such water for irrigation. For example, farmers from Mbonechera and Nsanama communities underscored the importance of forest resources, agroforestry, and water berry trees along streams for water and soil conservation. Domasi community participants reiterated that they had come to realise the importance of forest ecosystem services in providing micro-climate and relief rainfall. They all concurred that in the previous years before democracy (1994) when the forest were well protected they never experienced floods and severe droughts. They expressed concern on how they wish the previous forest management institution could be restored to help the forest rejuvenate to its original status.Participants from other communities emphasised more on the role of forest ecosystem resources as to reactive strategies in the face of climate calamities.Integration of adaptation strategies with short and long term benefits were most preferred in all the communities (Figure 2 and 3). Among the CSA technologies promoted by Perform, drought tolerant maize and rice varieties, orange fresh sweet potatoes, treadle pumps, rocket stoves and chicken passon were ranked as the most important adaptation strategies in Domasi community (Figure 2). It was interesting to note that rocket stoves were ranked highly in this community by male participants. Drought tolerant maize varieties and high value Kilombero rice varieties introduced by the project were ranked highly and most preferred by male participants in this community (Figure 2). The males in this community were merchandisers hence they greatly appreciated technologies that make their crop produce fetch higher prices on the market. The male participants reiterated that with the short season drought tolerant maize and high value kilombero rice variety they were able to enter the winter market early and fetch good prices. Both female and male participants in this community also rated crop species diversity as the most important adaptation strategy. This community is closest to Lake Chilwa, irrigation have been part of their tradition hence they ranked use of treadle pumps as the most important adaptation strategy. The Domasi community members (males and females) greatly valued the chicken pass-on strategy as substitute of forest resource extraction in times of need (Figure 2). Female participants reiterated that it was most prestigious to sell chicken along the highway relative to selling charcoal or wood when faced with a calamity. They also highlighted that due to the depletion of the forest it was also taking longer to extract and sell forest resources in the times of need. They also stressed that they could also use the chickens as collateral to borrow money in times of need which they could not do with forest resource extraction. Overall the Domasi community highlighted that CSA technologies that improve their income flow and reduce labor constraints such as the currently promoted combination of technologies were highly regarded in their community.Crop diversification into drought tolerant crops such as maize, sweet potatoes and cassava were ranked as most important adaptation strategies in upper Mtubwi (Figure 2). During the interactive discussion, farmers also emphasised that they supplemented their rainfed crop produce using income derived from selling horticultural crops. In this community treadle pumps were rated highly among the available adaptation strategies. It was saddening to note that due to increased exposure to climate shocks the social integration had degenerated in this community resulting in the failure of chicken pass-on projects. During the interactive discussion, both male and female participants in this community stressed that several organisations had introduced goat and chicken pass-on programs, but they had failed even to cover ten percent of the community. The first beneficiaries failed to pass on chicken to the next beneficiaries for selfish reasons. They had observed the first beneficiaries would either manure the sickly goats/chickens or postpone the passing on until the supposed beneficiary loose interest in following it (Figure 2).In Nsamana community, integrated soil and water conservation strategies such as conservation agriculture and farmer managed natural forest regeneration, with crop species diversification and drought tolerant varieties were rated highly as most important adaptation strategies (Figure 2). The participants perceived that about 40% of the community members were practicing conservation agriculture. Farmers in this community highlighted that drought tolerant crops such as cassava and sweet potatoes have become important adaptation strategies for erratic onset of rains, dry spells, moderate and severe droughts. Due to increased scarcity of water for domestic use and increased distances to fetch firewood, farmers in this community highly valued the integration of rocket stoves, farmer managed natural forest regeneration and forest tree regeneration along the rivers and streams. chicken pass-on program was also highly rated as an adaptation strategy to climate change in this community (Figure 2).Communities that were more prone to droughts, Mbonechera and Lower Mtubwi utilized more of the promoted strategies compared to the three other communities (Figure 3). During the interactive discussion, farmers from the two communities emphasised that due to increased crop failures and shortening of the rainfall season they had observed that integration of agriculture-related and nonagricultural strategies were very effective to deal with climate change effects. In Mbonechera, both female and male farmers perceived that combination of CA with diversified crop species and drought tolerant varieties as very important adaptation strategies for erratic onset of rains, increased dry spell and early termination of rains. During the interactive discussion, both male and female participants in this community stressed the importance of farmer natural forest regeneration, rocket stoves, village savings and loan clubs and chicken pass-on in moderating climate change effects. For example, female participants expressed the importance of saving clubs in providing resources to buy seed for replanting with increased erratic onset of seasons (Figure 3). The male participants in the same community underscored the importance of chicken pass-on schemes in moderating the climate change effects, reducing their reliance on the forest resources for cash liquidities. The existence of a lucrative market for indigenous chicken in the Liwonde Township increase the significance of the chicken pass-on strategy. Contrary to other communities, TLC Rocket stove were not highly rated in Lower Mtubwi. During the interactive discussion, both male and female farmers revealed that due to their proximity to the Liwonde Township and accessible roads they had been target of many fuel wood efficient stoves dissemination initiatives. Tree regeneration along rivers and streams was of importance in both communities because of increased water scarcity for domestic use (Figure 3).The gross margin analysis carried out from data obtained from a sample of CSA technologies adopters in the nine communities revealed clear benefit of these technologies relative to the traditional systems. The economic analysis further showed that CSA are profitable and worthy for the Machinga communities that are vulnerable to climate risks. The Mbeya manure provided the highest net-returns, return to investment and labor relative to CA, Non-CA, pigeon pea inter-crop and conventional maize only. The significant reduction in fertilizer cost and crop failure risk associated with Mbeya fertilizer made this CSA practice worthy to the vulnerable households in the Liwonde forest fringe communities. For every labor hour invested, farmers could get up to US$12.80, and US$10.20 in return on Mbeya manure and CA respectively compared to US$3.1 on conventional maize only. For every dollar invested for inputs, farmers would gain up to US$3.56 and US$1.08 on Mbeya manure and CA compared with up to US$0.35 on conventional maize only. The estimated profitability of Mbeya manure and CA system over the conventional system in the land constrained communities was attributed to improved land and labor use efficiency and increased crop yields. Mbeya manure had the highest net return which suggests that farmers who are able to adapt and adopt this CSA have a better chance of recovering their investments relative to conventional sole maize system.The main objective of the study was to understand the link between climate change, forest ecosystem services and agricultural production of Liwonde forest fringe communities. We contributed to the empirical literature on CSA by exploring the vulnerability of forest ecosystem and smallholder farming systems to climate change as well as identifying suites of adaptation options.The findings revealed that farmers from all the nine communities understood the linkage between climate change, forest ecosystem services and agriculture. Although they could not articulate the science, their explanation of climate change trajectories, observed changes in forest ecosystems resources and agriculture production were in tandem with projected changes. Climate change impacts on agriculture production and forest resources combined with increased forest management challenges increase the vulnerability of Liwonde forest fringe communities. The most common climate change hazards in the Liwonde forest fringe communities included erratic onset of rains, increased dry spell, severe droughts and heat waves. The main non -climate stressors identified as main drivers of forest ecosystem degradation and low agricultural productivity were population increase, political and economic policy change. Policy and market failures brought about by political change were also blamed for the poor forest governance. Forest resources were key livelihood assets for the nine communities. Charcoal production was ranked as the most important key resource extracted in the Liwonde forest reserve in eight of the communities. All the nine communities had a superficial understanding of co-management and acknowledged that they had a block in the Liwonde reserve forest under their care. They all had concern on the effectiveness of the current co-management strategy particularly how the transition was managed and the incoherence between the informal and formal institution.To manage the impact of climate change on forest ecosystem resources and agricultural production systems, these Liwonde forest fringe communities employed a combination of agricultural and nonagricultural innovations promoted by Perform at vary intensities. For Domasi, Nsamana, and Upper Mtubwi communities on the windward side of the Liwonde forest reserve integration of agricultural innovations such as drought tolerant crop varieties, cropping diversification and tredible pumps and non-agricultural innovations such rocket stoves and regeneration of trees along streams and rivers were the highly rated adaptation strategies for climate shocks. This mix of adaptation strategies had proved to be effective in helping the farmers in building both forest ecosystem services and agricultural resilience. For Mbonechera and Lower Mtubwi communities on the leeward side, integration of agricultural innovations such as, chicken pass-on, CA combined with crop diversification and drought tolerant crop varieties and non-agricultural innovations such as savings club, rocket stoves were considered effective in building forest resource and agricultural resilience. These results suggested that interventions aimed at reducing the vulnerability of forest resources and agricultural production to climate shocks should not only focus on agricultural technologies but also non-agricultural technologies.The importance of interventions that provide easily access to cash in times of need such as chickens, goats and savings is paramount to improved resilience of forest ecosystems and agricultural systems."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2140005494.json b/main/part_2/2140005494.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..470b07b71c8cea177d38a5f89c4403267f5345a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2140005494.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0ae038e98b75a6be4fdf27a8f2fbd813","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e2fdc2ba-dda5-4914-b70b-7e9b741780b2/retrieve","id":"-994708073"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3f51cb59-d654-4fc5-9fc0-0e1a435c0d9e","content":"La esporidesmi na, un metabol ita del hongo PLtholn!Jc.u C./¡a.l!.taJt.WIl se constató como el agente que produce la fotosensibilización hepatotóxica en ovinos y bovinos de Nueva Zelandia y ,Australia, (Mortimer y. Tayl?r, 1962). la esporidesminil es producida únicamente PO!' P. c.lu:uLtMUm Y es tóxica experimentalmente para bovinos, ovinos, y animales de laboratorio, (l~hite y c'ol. 1971)\". En Colombia y Brasil la fotosensibilización afecta preferentemente a animales jóvenes (ñ;enores de 24 meses) que pastoreán &a.c.h.i.aJUa dec.wnbe¡u, y se sospe-, , cha una '!'elación con el hongo P. c.I'l.IVLttvwm, (Nobre y'l\\ndrade, 1976; Garcí¡: y \" col., 1982)., la esporidesmina produce considerable daño hepátJco caracteriz~do por in-'tcrru¡)ción de la conducción bn iar (Dodd, 1959), el cual se detecta muy especialmente por elevación de la enzima gama-glutamil-transpeptidasa (~,G.T.), en el sue:-o sangu'íneo de los animales afectados, (To~lers y Straton, 197B; Muchiri y col., 1980), Und ,proporción cons.iderable de animales aparentemente sanos pueden sUfrir,afec.ción suucl'ínica detectada por niveles elevados de' G.G. T. a conSecuencia del daño hepático, (To\\'¡ers, 1978; Aycardi y col., 1983).El sulfato 'de zinc en inyección ha sido utilizado en ¡'¡ueva Zelandia como pro-~ector del efecto produci do pOI' 1 a esporidesmi na sobre el hígado, reduci endo las les.iones hepáticas y manteniendo la producción, de leche y el peso de los animales así tratados, (Towers y Smitl1, 1978).• ,• i .,. , El propósito de este estud,;o fue: 1) Reproducir experimentalmente los síntomas de fotosensibil~zación en novillos en Santander de Quilichao en el Depto.,del Cauca, Colombia; 2) Ohs~rvar, tanto las lesiones clínicas como subclínicas al introdl!cir ene] pasto el hongo P.i:thomyc.e6 c.hCl.ll.tlVLwn, y 3), , Estudiar el efecto de la adición de zinc al suelo y a la sal de los animales en el desarrollo de las lesiones.El 'estudio se reaiizó en la estación experimental Quilichao, Municipio de Santander de Quilichao, en el Depar'tamento del Cauca, Colombia, La esta-\" ción está ~ituada a 40 km. al sur de Cali a una altura de 990 m. •sobre el ' ,nivel del mar' y tiene una temperatura anual promedio de 23.3°C. Se escogieron 20 animalc?~ mestizos cebú de 12 a 14 meses de edad y se asignaron a _seis,; lote~, ':~.ee.rJ.\"le.ntales. de 3 animales cada unó. Los dos animales restJn-',tes se separaron como reemplazos.Los lotes experim~nta1es fueron parcelas de 0.3 ha. de pasto /3J!.1Ic.hi.tVl-út decumbuu,. Dos meses antes de iniciar el pastoreo, todos los lotes recibieron una fertilización básica de 20 kg P/ha, 50 kg Ca/ha, 50 kg K/ha, y 50 kg N/ha. Se esta~lecieron dos tratamientos y un control. Los tres grupos recibieron la aplicación de hongo' al pasto, el grupo control no recibió ninguna otra apl icación. El tratamiento 1 recibió z,inc aplicado al suelo al momento do 1'a fcrtil ilación de mantenimiento a razón de 5 kg/h/l. El tratamiento 11 recibió la adición de Zn en la sal mineralizada a razón de 50 ppm. Cada tratamiento tenía un lote de 3 animales y una repetición con otros 3 animales. La distribución de los lotes y de los animales dentro de cada lote se hizo al azar . las espm'as del hongo PUhomyc.cu> c.!uvz;taJ¡,WlI se asperjaron sobre las parcelas en las últizilas horas de la tarde. S'e hicieron tres aplicaciones del ---~--hongo\"una 20 dias antes de iniciar el pastoreo (Abril 14), otra cindo dias _a ____ _ antes del 'p'astoreQ, (t1ayo 3), Y la tercera 20 días después de inicia,do el mjs-.mo (l~ayo 28). -En total se aplicaron ~.5 x 101~ esporas en'las seis' parcelas.Estas esporas se diluyeron en 50 litros de agua destilada para'facilitar la aspersión. Se puso especial cuidado de asperjar aquellas partes de cada lote donde el pasto tenia más altura. Se determinó la concentl'ación de esporas en el pasto cada semana por la t.knica ya descrita, (Aycardi y col.., 1983). Brachiaria antes d~ la fertilizaci6n uno y dos meses después de aplicado éste .Para el estudio estadístico se utiliz6 el análisls de varianza y la prueba de Duncan para separaci6n de medias .., La caracterizaci6n del suelo de las parcelas donde se realiz6 el ensayo (Cuadro 1); mostr6 cómo al final del misnio el tenor de zinc aument6 considerablemente en'el tratamiento 1 al cual se le había aplicado fertilizaci6n básica más la adici6n de 5 kg de Zn/ha. El nivel pasó de 1.0-1.1 a 1.5-1.9 ppm lo cua] representa un incremento del 52%. El contenido de zinc en el ,tejido del pasto /3JLac./úaJUa. d~.C!!lJ7lben5 también se increme~t6 notablemEnte en este tratamier,to (Cuadro ,2). A los dos meses de aplicación de zinc al suelo el ,nivel de este elemento en el, pasto pasó de 18.2-20.9 a 34.0-35.5 ppm, lo cual representa un increm~nto promedio del 77%. La relación calcio-zinc en el tejid'o disminuyó e,n forma notable de niveles 22i¡~225 hasta 108-155; iD tual representa un d~scenso del 42%.Veintitres (23) días despuls de iniciado el pastoreo aparecieron dos animilles del grupo control y tratamiento II con síntomas externos de foto-sensibilizaci6n (edema de la papada, resecamiento de la piel y prurito cutáneo). En esa misma fecha otros tres animales de los mismos grupos mostraron inquietud y prurito cut~neo..'.. . . .'. , : .,miento 1 que se comportó en forma muy diferente al resto de este grupo y prácticamente se aebi1itó y murió cuando el ensayo había terminado (día 84) .los dos animales que murieron en los dias 27 y 28 del ensayo (Grupo,con-tro1 y tratamiento I)' fueron reempl'azados por los animales de reserva. Estos.dos animales presentaron ambos elevaciones en el tenor de enzima G.G.T. a las cuatro semanas de haber entrado al pastoreo. Los niveles fueron para el animal de1,grupo control, 24.5 u.r. y para el del tratamiento 11, 46.8 u.r.Tres de los 'cincoanímales que murieron tuv'ieron e'le\\'ac'ión del n,ivel de bilírrubina, valores de 0.6-3.6 y 4.4 mg/dl. Todos los animales que murieron presentaron edemas d2 cuello y papada. y tuvieron -también elevación de los niveles de transaminasa oxaloacética en el suero por encima de 70 unidades.Ocho animales mostraron 'indicies de ictericia pOr\" coloración amari.llenta de las mucosas y siete novillos mostraron prurito cutáneo, intranquilidad y de-,caimiento, (Cuadro 3). El nivel de daño hepát,ico medido por ,la elevación de enzima G.G. Esto permite deducir que la prueba pOdría vtilizarse para detectar los casos sub-clínicos y aún para predecir qué animales van a enfermar o morir en un lote de ,pastoreo. El nivel de enzima G.G.T. en animaíes que murieron parece , . indicar que,un animal tiene pocas probabilidades de sobrevivir si su tenor' de enzima sube más alHi de 80 unidades internacionales.Los niveles de bilirrubina sér'ica parecen elevarse únicamente en a19unos de los animales más afectados, especialmente en los que murieron. Los nive-,les sérlcos de transaminasa oxaloacética qu~ también se encuentran elevados en iI,lgunas afecciones que evolucionan 'con éstasis biliar, se encontraron elevados en todos los animales que murieron, sin ell1bargo en otros animales con sintom¡¡s evidentes no mostraron alteración. lo cual sugiere que estas pruebas son de poco valo;\" en el diagnóstico del di:lño hepático producido por aste tipo de fotosensibilización.Parece evidente que la p'rueba más fidedigna para determinar casos sub-cHnicos de, foto'sensibilización es la detección de elevación en los niveles de enzinm 6.G.T. del suero, sanguíneo de los bovinos. Es significativo comentar que los cinco animales que desarrollaron edema de cuello y papada 'murieron, a similitud de lo encontrajo en la mayoría de' los casos de enfermedad natural (Garcia y'co1., 1982). Otros signos clínicos, tales como la ictericia'observada en algunos casos, el prurito cutáneo\"la intranquilidad y el decaimiento, observado en otros, no ~arecen ser consis-.ten tes en todos los animales afactados.Par~ce existir una marcada susceptibilidad individual a la acción de la toxina del hongo. Hubo animales que enfermaron más rápidamente y con signos . más notorias. Sin embargo estas diferencias en' reacción pueden deberse a que el hongo tiene preferencias de crecimiento en ciertas partes del potrero, y 10s animales en este caso astarían som~tidos a d4ferentes concentraciones de toxina!:. :' Es de s:Jponer que el daño producido en los animales sobreviene a conse-., cuencia de la exposición a toxinas produc,idas por crecimiento y esporú1ación ¡\" , del hongo en la pradera y no a la, ingestión de las esporas que se inoculan .. '..Se agradece a 'jos Sres. Fél ix ~arreño y Jos~ G. Rivas por el manejo y supervisión de los animales. Al Dr, OUo Sánchez F., por la lectura de las láminas histopatológicas, y a Germán Lema y \"lada Cristina Amézquita por el análisis éstad~stico.-, . \" : ' . . I"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2154326736.json b/main/part_2/2154326736.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2e1023fd05ff6b84df62043ddffef810f19354cf --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2154326736.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"af65ed5f67d480040a0dcda4a66f277e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/69957494-e9c1-4221-b3c6-e3b11cb60c7f/retrieve","id":"-2022224468"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"68a20fce-b26a-4754-bb28-252a6519ae2b","content":"• Put in context of supply chainsAll workshop participants discussed together the way forward on inventory and research needs. This focused on what can be done in the:1. Short-term (time horizon 1 -2 years), largely with existing resources or with small additional funds available to kick-start small regional partnership tasks. Ideas were collected on this. While there was talk of something formal with a 'secretariat' to facilitate a 'community of practice' (for example, Livestock Community of Practice in Southern Africa), those with interest may just start and serve informally as 'coordinators' to get the collaborative tasks underway. 2. Long-term. The vision was to build a larger multi-funder regional program based on ideas developed by the research subgroup (see previous section) and enrich this to properly cover the inventory, NDC and carbon market opportunities. 3.• Address some regional priorities• Using existing resources or small additional resourcesA 'Community of Practice' on livestock GHG in the ASEAN Region to facilitate exchange and collaborationAn ASEAN framework for cooperation, country-funding and multiple donors can align to a common regional programme Short-term: What could we be doing with existing resources and do now to make a start on regional collaboration?• Current projects mentioned that may (no commitments !!) be able to support action on the listed tasks (advice/platforms/info/seed money) include: • All of these tasks could be managed under a \"Community of Practice\". If funded, ideally there would be a regional secretariat and enough resources to support exchange activities, bilateral exchanges, focused studies etc. ASEAN CRN and Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research (SEARCA) mentioned as possible links/platforms/secretariats.Longer-term: This would be a condensation of the planning by the inventory and research subgroup discussions summarised above. We did not do this combination during the workshop but we did discuss what sort of supporters were needed to engage to get the multiple streams of the program funded for a large long-term project. This list included the following but is not exhaustive as others are known to be interested in livestock GHG investment in the region (e.g. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2169905856.json b/main/part_2/2169905856.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f02de11addf5ed25a2a0bb67c2e9f82f31cec8e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2169905856.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c8b429c143c177dc4a0a4c15d56125e1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/cf598c5f-6dd4-4e62-a219-c946e09fa2b2/retrieve","id":"-1719114571"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"37ec6c6b-03b8-43c5-b9ab-6d8d4598b168","content":"El CIAT es una Inst!luClón sin ánimo de lucro, dedicada al desarrollo agrícola y económico de las lonas trop icales bajas . Su sede princi pal se encuentra e n un terreno de 522 hectáreas . cercano a Cali Dicho terreno es propiedad del gobierno colombiano el cual. en su calidad de anhtrión, brinda apoyo a las actividades del CIAT Est e dispone Igualmente de dos subestacione s propiedad de la Fundación para la Ed ucaCión Superior (FES) : OUllichao, con una extenSión de 184 hectáreas. y Popa yán , con 73 hectáreas. ambas en el Cauca . Junto con el Instituto Colombiano Ag ro pecua rio (ICA), el CIAT administra el Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias Carlmagua, de 22.000 hectáreas, en los Llanos Or ienta les y colabor a con el mismo ICA en varias de sus estaciones experimentales en Co lombia . asi como Con In sti tU Ci ones agricola s nacionales en otros paises de América Latina . Varios miembros del Gr upo Consultl \\lo para la Investigación Agrícola Internacion al (CG IAR) f inancian los programas del CIAT Durante 1983 tales donantes son' los gobiernos de Auslfalia . Bélgica. Canadá . España. Estados Unidos. Holanda, Italia. Japón , Noruega. el Re ino Unido. la República Federal de A lemania, Suecia y SUiza. el Banco InternaCiona l para ReconstruCCión y Fomento (BI RF); el Banco Interamerica no de Oesarrollo IBIO): l a Comunidad ,Económica Europea (CEE), el Fondo Int ernac ional para el De sarro llo Agrícola (IFAD); el Fondo de la OPEC para Desa rrollo 100ernaciona l; la Fundación Rockefeller y la Fundaci ón Ford Además varios proyeclQS especiales son finanCiados por alguna s de tales entidades y por la Funda ción Ke rrog g. el Programa de la s Naciones Unidas pa ra el Desarrollo (PNUO), y el ee Olro Internacional de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo (C IIO ) La información y las conc lusiones co ntenid as en esta publica CIón no r eflejan neces ariamente la pOSIC Ión de ninguno de los gobie rn os, institUC iones o funda-Cion es menC ionadas. .J J CCM~rr L1~ /YUCA EN COlECClON HISTORIC A C UL TIV OS ASOCIADOS Manejo y evaluación \" Dietrich leihner, Dr. agr. l'Agrónomo, Programa de YucaDeseo expresa r mi gra lilud a .Iohn K Lynam. Ph . D., economisra del programa de yuca del ClAT. por su conlribuciól1 Co n el capílulo \" Evaluación económica de los cullívos asociados\".manuscrilo, enlre ellos los Drs. Anlhony Bellolli. James H. Cock . .Ieremy Da vis, Reinhardl H. HOII'eler y Carlos Lozano de C IIIT. Raúl Moreno del Cenlro Agronómico Tropical de Invesligación y Enseñanza (CA TlE) en Turrialba, CasIo Rica. y Roger Mead. de la Universidad de Reading. Inglalerra; lanlO a ellos como a mis eSludianles y colaboradores que hicieron posible eSle lrabajo. va dirigido mi sincero agrodecimienlo.Por su conlribución confolOgraflas agradezco a los Dn. Michael D. Thung y Kun eeong SIeiner y al lng. Agr. Diego Fonseca. La presente publicación es la versión abreviada de una tesis de habilitación intitulada \"Cassava intercropping -management and eva luati on of cassa va intercropping systems\", sometida por el autor a consideración de la Facultad de Agronomía, Un iversida d de Giittingen , República Federal de Alemania .Cultivo intercalado en franjas . Consiste en se mbrar sim ultáneamente las especies que se va n a asociar disponiéndolas en bandas suficientemente anchas para permitir el cu lti vo indepe ndiente de cada una, pero al mismo tiempo 10 suficientemente estrechas para que ellas interactúen agronómicamente.Cultivo int ercalado en relevo. Consi ste en sembrar una o más especies dentro d e o tro cultivo ya establecid o, de tal forma que el fina l del ciclo de vida del primer cultivo coincida con el desarrollo inic ial del a Iro o de los o t ros (Ruthenberg , 1971: Andrews y Kassa m , 1976).Aapec:tos Básicos Biológicos y Nutrlcioaale.La asociación entre especies de duración similar ofrece ventajas derivadas so lame nte de la utilizació n de l es pacio, mientras que la asociación de culti vos co n duraciones dife rentes puede permitir una ganancia en el rendimiento to tal del sistema mediante un mej or a provecham iento de las dimensio nes espacio y tiempo .Tanlo e n la asociación de especie s de duració n similar como e n la de especies de cicl o vegeta tivo diferente, la suma de la s compete ncia s ' interespedficas es inferior a la s um a de las com petencias intraes pecificas de las mismas especies cuando se cu ltiva n separadamente en monoc u ltivo. Esta meno r competencia inte respeci fi ca da o rigen al mayor rendimient o to tal del sistema intercalado resultanle bien sea del mayo r rendimient o por plan ta, o bien de la mayor población to tal por unidad de á rea.En las asociacion es de cultivos de duraci ón si milar, la ventaja en el rendimiento viene entonces de una men o r co mpeten cia \"instantá nea\" por espac io , tanto en la parte aérea como dentro del suelo; en asoc iaciones de es pecies con ciclos vegetativos diferentes, en ca mbio , las ventajas se originan en una menor co m petencia interesped fi ca por espacio y por tiempo en razón del rá pid o crecimiento del c ul tivo precoz y en función de una men or co mpetencia intraesped fica por espacio y tie mpo debida aliento desarrollo del cultivo tardío (And rews y Kassam, 1976).El mon oc ultivo de la yuca, que en este co ntexto se considera como cu lti vo ta rdi o, no utiliza eficientemente los fact o res luz, agua y nutrimentos durante los primeros tres meses de su ciclo vegetati vo, debido a su lento desarrollo inicial; así permite intercalar en ese tiempo un cu lti vo precoz , haciendo má s eficiente el uso de esos factores de crec imiento . De igual manera, al fin a l de su cic lo vegetati va la yuca ya no intercepta toda la lu z incidente , y probablemente ta mpoco absorbe ya la gran cantidad de nutrimentos yagua que necesita dura nte su desarrollo más activo; por lo tanto , esta última fase en el cic lo de la yuca nuevamente se presta para intercalar otro cultivo (Figura J) . Los cultivos asociados normalme nte muest ran una menor va riabilidad que los mo nocultivos en té rmin os de biomasa tota l y de rendimien tos (Moreno y Hart ;19 79). Esto se refiere tanto a la producc ión to tal del sis tema como a la s produ cc io nes individuales de cada componente (Figura 2). Las causas de esa mayor esta bilidad, a pa rte del efecto com pensa tori o que existe entre los cultivos, posible mente tie nen que ver con la red ucida incidencia de en fermedades , plagas y malezas que ocurre como resultad o de la divers idad en la vegetación , y del mejor y \" más tempra no cubrimient o del sue lo (CIAT, 1978;Leihner, 1979;More no , 1979;More no y H a rt , 1979;Leihner, 1980a).Pa ra el producto r de subsistencia, la ma yo r estabilidad que presentan las siembras intercaladas en la producción de cultivos alimenticios tiene un significado importante , ya que tiende a asegurar su suste nto y disminu ye sustan cialmente e l riesgo de pérdida to ta l en su cosecha .Cuando el pequeño p roductor ad opta la asociación como su sistema de producció n, una parcela mu y pequeña le puede proporcionar los elementos básicos de su dieta , así: cultivos como yuca, batata (Ipomoea bala /a s), ña me (Dioscorea sp.), taro (Colocasia esculenla) y plá tan os ( Musa sp .), que SO n fuentes de carbohidra tos, proveería n principalmente el componente calórico, mientras que cultivos interca lados como frij o l (Phase ollls vulga ris), caup í (Vigila unguiclllata) , mungo (Vigila radia la) , maní (Arachis hypogaea), y 9 Fuente : Adaptad o de Moreno )' Hart . 1979 guand ul (Cajanus cajan) su ministraría n parte de la proteína necesaria. Así por ejemplo, un a hectá rea de yuca intercalada con frij ol negro puede producir lO t de raí ces frescas de yuca y 600 kg de frijol , los cua les aportan calo rí as y proteínas , así: 10,000 kg de yuca' = 13.44 x lO' Kcal = 56.270 MJ 600 kg de frijol = 168 kg de pro teí na \\ L os 10 ,000 kg de yuca co ntienen 3000 kg de almidó n. cuyo valor calórico es de 4480 Kcal/ kg.Suponiendo que los requerimientos alimenticios diarios de una perso na adulta son de 10.5 MJ (2500 Kcal ) y de 100 g de proteína', la producción mencionada da 5376 raciones calóricas y 1680 raciones de proteína ; esto da 1680 raciones completas más un excedente calórico de 3696 raciones = 38,686 MJ (9.24 x 10' Kcal) , sin considerar el contenido proteínico de la yuca ni el valor ca lórico del frijol. Así, con una hectárea se pueden alimentar cinco personas adultas durante un año, y queda un excedente de aproximadamente 6 t de yuca para la venta.Aunque esa no es una dieta completa y además no es probable que a lguien pueda subsistir con ella durante un periodo largo, hay que recordar que en algunas partes del mundo existen seres huma-nOS que tienen mucho men os que eso para su alimentación.El cálculo anterior se basa en los rendimientos que se obtienen con tecno logía tradicional en la asociación, pero con tecnología mejorada y un minimo de insumas, tales rendimientos se pueden duplicar fácilmente (Fonseca, 1981).AJDérica Latina.Se estima que aproximadamente el 40% de la yuca en América Latina se siemb ra intercalada (Díaz y Pinstrup-Andersen, 1977). Quizás la asociación más antigua es la de yuca con maíz practicada por los Mayas. Hasta hoy en día se encuentran maíces prehistóricos cultivados con yuca en partes remota•s de Guatemala, donde la agricultura ha permanecido tradicional (Moreno y Hart, 1979).En la costa norte de Colombia, la práctica consiste en se mbrar yuca en surcos un poco más distanciados que lo normal ( l.20 m) , intercalando simultá neamente maíz en una población baja (4000 sitios/ ha con 3-5 plantas/sitio). Los rendimientos de cultivos de yuca y maíz en asociación tradicional , según medidas efect uadas por el autor ,. so n 600-800 kg/ha de maíz y de 10-15 t/ ha de raices frescas de yuca , con muy poco uso de insumas quimicos comprados (CIAT,1980). La asociaclon de yuca con frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris) O caupí (Vigna ul1guiculala) también es muy frecuente; se practica en todo el hemisferio, pero tiene especial importa ncia e n América Central, Colombia y Brasil. Con frecuencia se siembra la yuca siguiendo el mismo patrón que se usa en mo nocultivo y el frij o l se siembra \"ma teado'\" en el mismo surco despué s de la primera desyerba (3 -4 de la yuca (20-30 t/ ha ) no se afecta pero el del frijol es muy bajo (200 kg/ha) según lo determinó el autor en cultivos de agricultores en Colombia (CIA T, 1980).Otros cultivos de ciclo corto que se asocian con yuca son arroz de seca no (Oriza saliva) , algodón (Gossypium sp.) y tabaco (Nicoliana labacum ) en Costa Rica y Colo mbia . Asociacio nes de yuca con ot ra s raíces y tubérculos como el taro, el ñame y el ca mote se practican en Nicaragua, mient ra s la asociación triple de yuca con maíz y ñame es típi ca en el noroccidente de Colombia .Hay además muchos siste mas en donde la yuca inte rviene como cultivo de cicl o corto asociado con culti vos perennes tales como caña de azúcar (Saccharum officinarum ) y cacao (Th eobrom a cacao) en Costa Rica, palma de aceite (Elaeis guineensis) en Colombia, palma de coco (Cocos nucifera) y caucho (H evea brasiliensis) en Bras il. En estos sis te mas , la yuca se puede considerar como cultivo secu ndari o y su productividad es no rma lmente baja debido a la poca incidencia de luz debajo de los cultivos perennes cuand o han pa sad o de su fase inicial de desarrollo.Con excepción d e alguna s partes donde la producción agrícola se caracteriza por plantaciones de gran ex tensió n, la práctica de cultivos interca lados es muy común en toda el Africa tropica l. Se estima que la yuca sembrada en sistema s in tercalados en ese continente representa hasta el 50% o más del total (Nyombe , co m. pers., 1981). En Uganda, por ejemp lo , el 49 % de la yuca se cult iva asociada , mientras que en Nigeria la po rción de yuca in tercalada es más baja (27 %) (Okigbo y Greenland, 1976) . En campos lej a nos de las a ldeas es más frecuente el monocultivo de yuca, mientras que en la cercanía de las casas so n co munes los sistemas muy co mplejos de cul ti vos intercalados, los cua les in cluyen una variedad de especies alimenticias anuales, horta li zas y á rboles frutales .Las asociaciones típicas son en forma de relevo empezando con o tros c ultivos e interca la ndo la yuca cua ndo los primeros ya se I Varias planta s por siti o.encuentran avanzados en sus ciclos de crecimiento O están por terminarlo . Hay secue nc ias típicas por regiones, tales com o caupí-Amaran/hus (como verdura) -maíz-yuca; ñame-m~íz-yuca; o ñameme ló n (Cueumeropsis mannii)-maíz-okra (Abe/mosehus eseu/en /us) + yuca con cacao para Nigeria; a rrOZ seca no-chile (Capsieum annuum )-to ma te (Lycopersicon escu/en/um)-frijo l-ma íz-bana no (Musa sp.)-yuca, todo en siembra simultánea , en Liberia; a rroz secano-maí z-ok ra-chile-yuca, en Sierra Leona, y maní-yuca-ajo njolí (Sesamum indicum)-sandía (Ci/rul/us /ana/us)-so rgo -hyptis (Hyplis spicigera) (una yerba)-mijo (E/eusine coracana) en Zai re.En la mayoría de estas secuencias la yuca se siembra como último cultivo antes de cambiar de parcela. Esto se debe probablemente a que en el sistema de agricultura migratoria, que aú n es mu y practicado , la fert ilidad del suelo se agota después de producir varias cosec has y só lo la yuca, con su habilidad para crecer y producir en suelos de baja fertilidad, es capaz de rendir a lgo.Un a nálisis de las siembras intercaladas con yuca en Nigeria mostró que e l 77% de esta especie se siembra sobre mo ntículos preparados a mano, y predomina la siembra intercalada mi xta. Sin emba rgo, cada especie tiene su propio lugar en el montícul o, bien sea en la ci ma. el costa do o al pie del mism o, y la yuca se siembra con frecuencia po r el costa d o . La densidad de siembra es a lta ( 15 ,000 plantas/ha), pero el promedio de rendimientos no supera las 6 l/ ha de raíces fresca s (Ezeil o, 1979).No se han obtenido estimativos para Asia sobre el porcentaje de yuca se mbrada en sistemas intercalados, pero la proporció n es seguramente más baja en este continente que en Africa o en América Latina . Sin embargo, la siembra de yuca asociada con un gran número de especies. sobre todo en las huertas y alrededores de las casas rurales , tiene un a gran importancia para la alimentación humana, simi lar a la observada en Africa y América Latina.El arroz es el elemento central en la mayoría de los siste mas asiáticos de culti vo. Para producirlo en forma renta ble se establecieron sistemas de ri ego que según la región cubren de 19 a 47% de las tierras arables (Harwood y Price , 1976). Esto podría favorecer las siembras de yuca con otros cultivos pero normal mente las co mplica , ya que los suelos arroceros arcillosos (ricos en montmorillonita) so n dificil es de prepa ra r para cultivos de secano.La regulación del agua es ese ncial para producir cultivos en húmedo y en seco al mism o tiempo . Esto se logra formando divisiones entre áreas altas y bajas cama en el método de acequia y caballón de Tailandia, o en el sistema \"Sorjan\" de Indonesia (Suryatna Effendi, 1979), donde el arroz se cultiva en franjas baja s mientras los cultivos de secano se encuentran en camas elevadas de 4 a 8 m de ancho; en estas camas la yuca se siembra normalmente en los bordes y hacia el centro se siembran uno o varios de los siguientes cultivos: cebolla (Allium cepa), maní , soya (Glycine max.) , chile. maíz, pepinos (Cucumis sa liva) , mungo ya veces camote.La división entre las partes altas y las bajas puede ser a rtificial o se puede ajustar a condiciones naturales de la topografía como en el sur de la India , donde el arroz con riego predomina en los valles mientras.que la yuca -frecuentemente intercalada entre palmas de coco -se encuentra en las zonas de transición entre los valles y la s partes elevadas .En Indonesia, la yuca interviene como tercer cultivo después del arroz y el maíz; éstos se siembran simultáneamente y la yuca se inte rcala 30 a 40 días después. También es común la yuca asociada con maní en relevo, sembrándola 30 días después del mani. En Tailandia se siembra mu y poca yuca asociada con otros cultivos pero ocasionalmente se encuentra en asociación simultánea con maíz; en este caso el patrón de sie mbra para la yuca es de aproximadamente 1 x 1 m, encontrándose tanto en surcos como mezclada .El sistema de cultivos anuales de ciclo cort o, junto con un cultivo de relevo de ciclo largo que les sigue (arroz y maí z con yuca), tiene un importante significado donde es difícil la preparació n del suelo y no se dispone de mecanización: con una sola preparación del terreno es factible producir dos o tres cosec has po r año.En India, Malasia, Tailandi a y Filipinas , más que en otros países, también se intercala yuca en plantaciones perennes como palma de coco, palma de aceite, caucho, mango (Mangifera indica) y banan o. Mientra s que en los sistema s descritos antes la productividad de la yuca puede alcanzar niveles altos de acuerdo con la intensidad del manejo , en la asociación con especies perennes sus rendimientos so n usualmente bajos ya que la sombra reduce drásticamente su productividad (Mohan Kumar y Hrishi, 1979).Como se ha visto en el capi t ulo anterior , la prod ucti vid ad de la yuca y los cu lti vos asoc iados es baja en la mayo ría de los sis tema s de cultivo tradicio na les. Las principales razones para esta baja productividad son: a) La asociación n o aco nsejable d e espec ies, por lener tipos de p lanta o ciclos vegetativos no com patible s. b) La coi ncidencia de las fases de má ximo crecim iento a causa de é pocas relativa s de s ie mbra inadec uadas. lo que conduce a u na excesiva co mpetencia interespecífica . e) Uso de den sid ades de sie mbra mu y bajas o mu y s uperio res a las ópt i mas (e n poca s ocas io nes) e inad ecuados pa trones de sie m bra. d) Baja ferti lid ad del sue lo y ause ncia o deficiencia de medidas fit osani ta ri as.Durante varios años se ha realizad o investigación para buscar solución a es tos prob lema s; como resultado. ahora es posib le desc ribir los sig ui e ntes ele me nt os d e una tecnología mejo rada para la asociación de yuca con otros cultivos.La yuca prese nt a una va ri ac ió n amplia e n los háb it os de c recimi en to con respecto a la ram ifica ció n y a l vigor ini cia l. do s ca racte-~ rí slicas que puede n innuir e n la ca ntidad de 1111. Ílifercep,laCI ii'l;>or la pl a nta d ura nt e las prim eras e tapasr\"de !tl erecimic nJl ,:~.' I ~ \\ \\. 1 \" \" I 1 15'-., n10'E ( J Las variedades con hábito de crecimiento erecto (ramificación tardía) y vigor med io posi blemen te hacen menos so mbra a un cultivo asociado que aquellas con ramificación temprana y alto vigor inicial. El efecto se aprecia en el Cuadro 1 donde se ve que la variedad M Mex 59 , co n alto vigor y ramificació n temprana , causa más depresión en el rendimiento de un frijol asociado que cinco variedades seleccionada s, con vigor medio y ramificación tardía.Adicionalmente , las variedades de vigor medio y ramificación tardía se aproximan más al \"tipo id ea l de planta para máximo rendimiento\" en mon ocultivo, descrito por Cock et al. (1979) ; los datos del Cuadro I confirman la superioridad de este tipo de planta tanto en monocultivo como en asociación, si bien en este caso la superio ridad no fue estadísticamente significativa. Por otra parte, los rendimientos del frijol fueron significativamente más afectados por el tipo de yuca vigoroso y de ramificación tempra na, que por los de vigor medio y ramificac ión media a tardía.Por consiguiente, las variedades de vigor medi o y ramificació n tardía (porte ereclo) parecen se r las más indicadas para la asociación, ya que ejercen relativamente poca competencia sobre el cul-Cuadro l. Efecto del tipo de planta de yuca (vigor y ramificaciÓn) sobre su rendimienlo en monocultivo y en asociación y sobre el rendimiento del frijol común asociado, en elATo Una ca rac te rística importa nte para la se lección de una leguminosa de grano como cu lt ivo as ociado es su precocidad para Oorece r y madu rar. Su madurez temprana red uce su período de co mpetencia con la yuca y le permite escapa r a la sombra excesiva de ésta dura nte e l llenado de las vainas.A medida que aume nta el tiempo durante el cua l los dos cultivos están juntos en el campo, la interacción entre ellos se acentúa más y má s, y los rendimient os se afectan mutuame nte . Esto se hizo evidente a l co mpa ra r los coeficientes de correla ción entre los rendimient os de la yuca y cuatro especies de leguminosas co n diferen tes períod os de maduració n asociadas con ella ; mi entras en el caso de las leguminosas precoces (frij ol y caupí) no se observó ninguna correlación en tre los rend imien tos de las especies asociadas , en las leguminosas co n un ciclo vegetativo ma yor de 100 día s se hizo evidente una crecien te co rrelació n negati va , indicand o un grado más alto de interacción entre las especies asociadas (Cu adro 2) .Al co ntra rio de la precoc idad , el hábito de crecimiento de la legu minosa, sea erecto o rastrero, parece no tener mucha importancia siempre y cuando no sea trepador (para sie mbra s simu ltáneas) .En un experimento sobre asociaciones de yuca con nueve variedades de ca upí , los rendimientos de la yuca asociada co n las ocho Valor r' 0.0 1 0.05 -0. 14 -0.35 ' variedades de caupí de hábito erecto , semierecto o rastrero se red ujeron en tre 6 y 24 % con respecto a l mo noc ultivo ; en cambio , una va riedad de ca up í con tendencia a trepar reduj o el rendimiento de la yuca en 32% (Hege wa ld y Leihner , 1980) .Sin embargo , cuando la yuca llega a l fina l de su cic lo vegetativo ta mbi é n se puede asociar con ti pos trepad o res de leg u minosas co mo frijol vo lubl e co mún (Pha seolus vulgaris), frij o l lim a ( Phaseolus luna rus ) y frij o l terciopel o (Mucuna deeringiana). En es te caso , se pueden escoge r las especie s y vari edades de leguminosas mej o r ada ptada s y de más alto vigor , ya qu e deben compet i r con un culti vo de yuca es tab leci d o. La yuca , por su part e, a un a soc iá ndo la con legumin osas voluble s muy vigorosa s, norma lmente no sufre reducció n en su ren dimiento porque en esa etapa de su desa rroll o la producció n de raíces ya ha sid o determinada en su mayor parte (CIAT, 1978 ;C IAT , 1982) Otro. cultivo •.Hay gran va riedad de o tra s espec ies que se asocian con yuca, como se ha descrito en el capítul o an ter io r. Para que la asoc iació n sea exitosa , ta les es pecies se deben se leccionar teni end o en cuenta factore s co mo la duració n de l ciclo vegetativo, el hábito de crec imi en to y el destino de la producci ó n.Para sie mbra simultán ea , la especie asociada con la yuca debe tener un cicl o vege ta ti vo prefe ribl eme nte in fer io r a 100 día s y há bito de crec imi ento erecto O postrado. Si se va a se mbrar hacia el fina l del ciclo vegeta ti vo de la yuca, el período de maduración de l cul tivo asociado no debe exceder de 120 días cuando se desea cosechar simu lt á neame nte las dos es pecies; pero la d urac ió n de l c ulti vo asociado no es importante cuando se trata del sis tema de re levo . Las especies para interca lar en cultivo s de yuca ya es tablecidos pueden ser de háb it o de crec imie nt o arbustivo o vo luble, co n toleranci a a la sombra , siendo ésta una característica particu larme nte desea ble.Si los productos de la asociación se destinan a la ali ment ació n hum a na (o a nim a l), se deben escoge r para intercalar con la yuca fuente s de proteí nas como verd ura s y leg uminosas de grano en luga r de otras fuente s de carbohidra tos como el camo te o el taro. Por otra pa rt e, si los productos de la asociación se destinan a la ve nta, cua lquier c ulti vo con precio renta ble sirve para la asoc iación.Ya se ha mencionado que aparte de las asociaciones de yuca con c ulti vos anuales , la asociación con cultivos perennes tiene cierta impo rtancia . Así, durante el es tablecimiento de especies co mo palma de coc o , palma de ace ite y ca ucho , la yuca puede a yuda r a pa ga r pa rte de los cos tos de esa fa se. c ua nd o toda vía no ha y p rod ucción del cu ltiv,O pe renne; sin e mbarg o, cuand o tales es pecies crece n e imponen s u sombra, la yuca deja de producir rendimie ntos rentables y la asocia ció n no pued e ga ra nti za r más un a ve ntaja eco nómica. Como una exce pción , especi es perenn es forraje ras d e po rte ra strero como eí Sry!osanr/¡ es guianell sis se pueden asociar durante la rgos perí odos con la yuca , beneficiá nd o la ade más po r la fij ació n de nitrógeno (Niti s, 1977 ).La siembra del cu ltivo asocia d o antes, al mi smo tiempo , o después d e la yuca ti e ne implicac io nes tanto bi o lóg ica s com o prác ticas. La yu ca no impone much a co mpe tenc ia a l principi o de su ciclo vegetativo pe ro ta mpoco to lera muc ha compe tencia; su rendimi e nto se puede redu cir drás ticam e nte si el c ulti vo asoc iad o se sie mbra e impo ne muy temprano su co mpe te ncia po r luz y ot ros fa ctores de crecimiento. Por o tro lad o, si la yuca se siem bra antes. puede afect a r con su so mbra y co mpetencia por o tros fac to res de crecimient o, el desa rrollo y rend imi ento del cultivo int ercalad o.Experim e ntos realizados con yuca y frijol (Figura 3) de muestran que el rendimient o tota l má s alto se o btiene se mbrando a mbos cultivos al mis mo tiempo (siembra simultánea) O con un a diferencia entre las fecha s de siembra menor de una semana (Thung y Cock, 1979) . Es ta prá ctica se ha verificado en muc hos experimentos, asociando yuca co n o tra s legumin osas o co n maíz , y ha dado resultad os ig ualmente positivos .Una implicación prá ctica de la siembra simult ánea es que para esta blece r la asociación se requiere una sola o peració n en lugar de dos procesos separados . Esto puede permitir cierto grado de mecanizació n en e l establecimiento de los cultivos asociados, si la maquinaria ex istente se adapta para este propósito .Mi entra s la época relativa de sie mbra puede ay ud ar a regular la compe te ncia por lu z c uand o los c ult ivos asoc iados inicia n juntos su ciclo vegetativo, cua nd o el cultivo asociado se in terca la con un cultivo de yuca ya es tablecido la situación puede se r diferente: aquí la luz puede ser el fa ctor má s limitativo pa ra la asoc iación . No obstante, obse rvaciones hechas en el CIAT muestran que hacia el final de su ciclo vege tativo la yuca inte rcepta men os lu z que durante su fa se de más activo crecimiento , lo que permite la producción de un cu lti vo asoc iado durante los últimos meses ante ri o res a la cosecha de la yuca; a l sembrar frijol arb ustivo a los sie te, ocho y nueve meses des pués de se mbrada la yuca, la reducción del rendimiento de frijol se mbrado más tarde fue menor, ya qu e mejora ro n para él las condiciones de luz (Figura 4). Se puede concluir que mientras má s tarde se sie mbre el cultivo intercalado en un yuca l esta blecido , mejor es el rendimiento; no obstante , la productividad del cultivo intercalado en estas co ndiciones es mu y inferi or a la de una asociación cuando ambos cultivos inician juntos su ciclo vegetativo.En sistemas tradicionales de cultivo, la yuca e n asoc iació n se siembra frecuentemente a den sidades más bajas que en monocultivo . Treinta y siete ingenieros agrónomos que tra bajan con yuca en Am érica La tina informaron, como práctica corriente en sus países , un rango de den si dade s de siembra entre 3000 y 25,000 plantas/ha para mo nocultivo (1 1,300 en promedio) y entre 4000 y 18,000 planta s/ha para yuca asociada (8300 en pro medi o) (Leihner y Castro , 1979).La baja densidad, junto co n la competencia impuesta por el o los cu ltivos asociados, explican en parte la baja productividad de la yuca en los sistema s tradiciona les de asociación. Esta situació n se puede corregir sembrando la yuca a la misma densidad que se considera óptima para el monocultivo.Con variedades de much o follaje y ramificación temp rana como MCol 11 3, se obtienen en monocu ltivo rendimientos máximos usando densidades de siembra relativamente baj as; estas densidades también produ cen los mejores rendimientos en asociación. Por su parte, las variedades de yuca con menos follaje y ramificación tardía como M Me x lIn o muestran el mismo grado de coincidencia de altos rendimientos en monocultivo y en asociación; sin embargo, si se usa n de nsidades intermedias de siem bra se pueden obtener buenos rendimientos en monocu ltivo (aproximadamen te el 92% del máxi mo) y rendimientos aceptables en la asociación (75-90% del máximo), como se obse rva en la Figura 5.Con un incremento en la densidad de siembra de la yuca , normalmente se reduce el rendimiento del cultivo asociado (Figu ra 5); sin embargo, COmo lo muestran estos resultados, so lamen te se requieren poblaciones intermedias de yuca para producir rendimientos aceptables. En esta forma se pueden utilizar en la asociación densid ades que se aproxi man a las ideales en monoc ulti vo, sin causar excesivas reduccio nes en el rendimiento del culti vo a sociado . Genera lm ente, el rendi miento de las legumin osas de gra no co mo re spuesta a diferentes densidades de siem bra no va ría mucho dentro de un rango relativamente amplio .Ensayos con frijol, caupi y maní en monocultivo y en asociación co n yuca mos traro n prod ucciones constantes o respuestas poco marcadas a l va ri a r la densidad de siembra e ntre 50 y 200% de la densidad óptima en monocu ltivo (Thung y Cock , 1979;Hegewald y Leihner, 1980;Fonseca 1981). Cuando se o bse rva una densidad óptim a de la legum in osa de grano en mo nocultivo, frecuentemente es ta de nsidad o una li ge ra mente mayor permit e obtener rend imientos máximos al se mbra r la legumin osa en asociación con yuca (Figura 6).Teóricamente, las po blaciones altas de leg umin osas deberían compe tir má s co n la y uca y reducir su rendim iento más q ue las bajas ; sin embargo, en la práctica no se han observado correlacione s significativa s en tre las poblaci one s de la leg um inosa y el ren d imiento de yuca (F igura s 7 y 8). De ahí que la s p oblaciones de leguminosas q ue da n los mejores res ul tados en mo noculti vo ta mbi én se pueden usa r e n asociación con yuca . En el C uadro 3 se da n las pob lacio nes ó p tima s para legumin osas de g ra no e n monoc ulti vo ye n asociació n.Caupl ( plan!a~/ ha )Figura 6. Efectv d~1 siSlema de cultivo y de la poblaCión sohre el rendimiento de caupf.Fuente: Fo nseca. 198 1.Caupi (plan t a ~/ha x 10)) 4', \"O 100 Cuadro 3. Densidades de siembra recomendadas para leguminosas de grano en asociación con yuca yen monocultivo. Poblac ión adecuada para monocultivo y asociación (plantas/ha) 200,000 -250,000 110,000 -160,000 80,000 -110,000 200,000 -250,000 200,000 -250 ,000 Los mis mos principios encontrados para las densidades óptimas para el monocultivo y la asociación de yuca co n legum inosas de grano son vá lidos para la asociación yuca-maíz .Al co mpa rar un sistema tradicional de asociación entre yuca se mbrada a I x 1.2 m (8333 plantas/ha) y maíz a 2 x 1.2 m (tres plantas po r sitio: 12,500 planta s/ha) con un siste ma má s intensivo donde la yuca se sembró a una densidad de 10 ,417 pl an ta s/ha y el ma íz a 41,667 pla ntas/ha , no se observaron cambios en el rendimie nto de la yuca , pero la producción del maíz se triplicó en el siste ma más inte nsivo (CIA T, 1980). Con la densid ad alta del maíz, la yuca no sufrió red ucció n en su rendimiento debido tanto a l arreglo espacial ( 1. 6 x 0.6 m) , diferente del sistema tradi cio nal que redujo el efect o de la competencia , como al hecho de que la densidad de siembra de la yuca se aumentó ligeramen te. También el tipo vigoroso de la yuca cv. Secundina pu do haber tolerado mejor que o tras variedades la co mpetencia del ma íz.El patrón de siemb ra más frecuentemente usado con la yuca en monocultivo es el de 1 x I m o similar. Si n embargo, este arreglo no brinda condicio nes óptimas para la a sociación, po rque la yuca cubre el terreno más rá pidamente que en otros a rreglos, imponiendo sombra al cu ltivo asociad o desde muy temprano (Castro, en impresión ).Esto determinó la necesi dad de exam inar arreglos espaciales diferentes, con el propósito de crear condiciones má s favorables para el culti vo asociado . En experi mentos rea li zados en varias localidad es y con diferentes variedades se co mprobó que a l remplazar el patrón de siembra cuadrado (1 x I m) po r e l rectangular (2 x 0 .5 m), incluyendo algun os arreglos intermedios , el rendimiento de la' yuca no se afecta si se mantiene la mism a densidad de sie mbra (Cuadro 4) .Los dat os obtenidos sugieren que se puede escoger un arreglo recta ngu la r para la yuca, el cual no reduce lo s rendimientos de la misma y facilita acomodar los cultivos interca lados, crea ndo co ndiciones favorab les para la asociación .En cu ltivos come rciale s de legum inosas de grano en mo noc ulti vo , la distancia normal entre surcos varia entre 0.30 y 0 .80 m. Para asociaciones de yuca con legumin osas Thung (1978) sugirió un arreglo en el que la yuca se siembra a 1.80 m entre surcos (0. 60 m entre planta s) y las leguminosas a 0 .90 m entre surcos, con preparación del terreno en camas; según el mis mo autor , este arreglo todavía se encuentra dentro de las va ria cio nes no rm ales de los arreglos usados en la producción de leguminosas de grano. La misma distribución es factible cuando la yuca se siembra sobre ca ballones a nchos, pero cuando la asocia ción se practica en terren o plano , hay más flexibilid ad para aco moda r las hileras de leguminosas.Eva luando tres a rreglos de hilera s de caupí co n yuca se mbrada en plan o (Figu ra 9) se encontró que co n una di stribució n pareja de las leguminosa s (arreglo 60/ 3) se utilizó más eficien temente el es pacio dis ponible ent re la yuca en un amplio rango de dens id ades de sie mbra , tanto en monocultivo como en a sociació n; la ven taja del arreglo 60/ 3 fue estadí sticamente significativa co mparada con el arreglo 70/2 a 110 ,000 pla ntas/ha en mon ocultivo y co n los arregl os 45/ 2 y 70/2 a 140,000 plantas/ha en a sociación. El resultado menos favorab le del arreglo 70/ 2 en monocultivo se debió posiblemente al alto nivel de co mpetencia dentro del cultivo de caupí (co mpetencia intraespecifi ca), mientras que los rendimientos gene ra lmen te baj os del caupí en el a rreglo 45/2 en asociación (Figura 10) se pudiero n deber al mayor grado de competen cia entre la yuca y el caupí (competencia interespecifica). Fuenle ' Fonso:ca. 198 1.En un ensayo en que se probaron los arreg los 60/ 3 y 70/2 en una asociació n yuca-maní se obtuvieron resultados similares. La distribución más pareja del maní en monocultivo y en asociación con yuca, alcanzada con el arreglo 60/3, condujo a rendimíentos de maní superiores a los cosechados en el a rreglo 70/2 para todas las densidades usadas en este experimento.La diferencia entre los d os arreglos fue sign ificativa para 150,000 plantas/ha en ambos sistemas de sie mbra y decreció a un nivel no significativo con las poblaciones más altas . Esto demuestra que no só lo se deberían co nsiderar se paradamente los dos factores, densidad de siembra y arreglo espacial, si no que también se debería co nsiderar su interacción . Con el incre mento en la densidad de sie mbra el arreglo 60/3 mostró más simi li tud con el arreglo 70/2, lo cual es lógico ya que las más altas densidades de siembra deberían haber indu cido más competencia intraespecífica aun en el arreglo 60/ 3, creando una situació n de campo para el maní similar a la preva lente en el arreglo 70/2 aun a partir de las densidades bajas (Figura 11).Estos resultados sugieren que mientras más uniforme sea la distribución de la leguminosa en el espacio di sponib le entre las hileras de yuca, mayor es su rendimiento debido a que hay un aprovechamiento más com pleto de los factore s de crecimiento, junto con un bajo nivel de co mpetencia intraespecí fica. Si n emba rgo, no parece recomendable esparcir demasiado las leguminosas dentro del espacio disponible colocándolas muy cerca de la yuca, ya que esto podría aumenta r la competencia en tre los d os cultivos (compe tencia in teres ped fica).La asociación de cultivos se ha considerado ventajosa por su efecto con se rvador del suelo. Burgos ( 1980) encontrÓ que en va rias asociaciones de yuca con otros cultivos, la abso rció n q ue éstos hada n de los nut ri me nt os del s uelo era superi o r a la pérdida po r lavado y e rosión , mientra s que en el mo nocu ltivo de yuca, la pérdida de nutrimentos por lavado y erosión supe raba varias veces su absorción por el cultivo.Por o tro lado , la asociación de yuca con o tro(s) cu lti vo(s) rep rese nta una intensificació n en la demanda de nutrim entos, sobre todo cuand o los cultivos asociados se sie mbran a las densidades no rmales del monocu ltivo. En esta situación , la remoció n de a lg un os elementos del sueloes mayor en la asociación que en e l mo nocu lti vo de yuca (Cuadro 5) , y si no se rep onen co n una fertili zación adecuada se puede llegar muy rápidamente a un deterio ro de la fertilidad del suelo.Existe muy poca informació!) acerca de la ferti lización correcta en siste mas de asociación, sobre as pectos tales como requerimie ntos de nutriment os y respuestas por parte de los culti vos indi vid ua les, posibles ca mbios de las respuestas en la asociación, competencia por nutrimentos y co mplementación , modo correcto de aplicació n de los nutrimentos (voleo o banda), época apropiada para la ap licación, y fuentes má s adecuadas de fertilizantes en los cultivos asocia- Requerimientos nutricionales de la yuca y cultivos asociados. Los reque rimie nt os nutricionales de la yuca y algunos d e los cultivos más frecuentemente a sociados con ella es tá n relati vamente bien estudiados. La yuca remueve cantidades grandes d e N y K del suelo, má s aún cuando no se le devuel ve la parte aérea de la planta ; sin embargo, la fertilizaciÓn con esto s eleme nt os frecuentemente no produce una respuesta muy alta en rendimie nt o de raíces, a menos que la producción de yuca sea continua; baj o esta circunstancia la respuesta a l K puede llegar a ser más acentuada.La yuca se beneficia grandemente de la asociación con micorriias para la abso rción de P en muchos s uelos pobres; también responde bi e n a la aplicación de ese elemento, aunque remueve del sue lo só lo pequeñ as ca ntidade s del mism o. La nutrición de yuca Con Mg, S.y en part icular con Zn es importante en suelos po bres como los Oxi so les y Ultisoles tropicales (H o weler, 1981) .Las diferentes especies de legumin osas de ciclo corto tienen requerimientos nutricionales similares entre sí: remueven grandes cantidade s de N pero tienen la capacidad d e fij a r este elemento yasí sa ti sfa cer al meno s parcialmente sus requerimientos . En muchos suel os pobres, las leguminosas tambi é n res po nden marcadamente a la aplicación de P sin remover grande s cantidades de este elemento. En la s leguminosas se observan requerimientos especificos con respec to a elementos menores como el B (Howeler e l al .. 1978) Y el Zn (e IAT, 1977); el ea también muestra imp o rtancia como nutrimento en a lgunas especies com o el maní .En el maíz, e l req uerimiento mayor para s u de sa rrollo normal y buen rendimi ent o es por N seguido por K y P. En muchos sue los pob res, el P adquiere una importancia prim o rdial co mo elemento mayor y el Zn y el B como micronutrimentos (eIAT, 1973).Selección de cultivos para la asociación. La corrección de la s deficiencias de un suel o po bre en nutrimentos mediante la aplicación de fe rtilizantes es bi ológica mente justificable pero puede no ser económica cuando se neces itan a ltas can tidades d e correc tivo's o fertili zan tes costosos . U na alternativa para ob tene r buen os rend imient os en suel os de baja fertilidad es la selección de c ultivos que se adapten bien a las condicio nes de deficiencia nutricional , acidez y toxicidad por Al y Mn , y que con pocos ins umos produ zca n rendimientos aceptables. E n particular, la se lección de especies co n to le-ranCIa a las condiciones de ac idez e infertilidad de los suelos que prevalecen en grandes exten siorres de los trópicos ayuda ría a reducir la cantidad de insumos necesarios para la producción agrícola en estas áreas.En un O xisol extremadamente ácido de los Llanos Orientales de Colombia (según el Cuadro 6), se lle vó a cabo un estudio para evaluar el desarrollo y rendimiento de sei s cultivos (frij ol común de semilla coloreada, frijol común de semilla negra, maíz , a rroz, caupI , y yuca)al aplicar cal agríc ola a los nivele s de O, 0.5 , 2 y 6 t/ ha. Sin la aplicación de cal, la yuca produjo apro ximadamente el 54% de l rendimiento máximo; en cambio, la producción de frijol común (coloreado y negro), maí z y a rroz sin cal fue casi nula y sólo con 2 ó 6 t/ha de cal alcanzaron niveles moderad os de producció n. El único cultivo con tolerancia a la a cidez y a la baja fertilidad , similar a la de la yuca , o aun mejor , fue el caupí, que sin cal rindió 60% del máximo y más del 80% con 0.5 t/ ha de cal (Cock y Howeler, 1979).En un Inceptisol altamente ácido e infértil de CIAT-Quilichao (Cuadro 6) se probó una amplia colección de legumin osas de grano , co n el propósito de evaluar tanto su tolerancia a condiciones e xtremas de suelo , como su aptitud para la asociación con yuca. Se sembraron, en un diseñ o de bloques completos al a zar con dos replicaciones en monocultivo y en asocia ción con yuca , 61 variedades de caupí, 66 de mungo (Vigna radiata), 14 de guandul (Cajanus cajan), 9 de frijol alado (Psophocarpus re¡ragonolobus ), 2 de frij ol terciopelo (Stizolobium deering ianum) , I c ultivar de ma ní (Amchis hypogaea) , I de Canavalia ensi(ormis y I de C. gladiara. De todas estas especies sólo el caupí y el maní mostraron adaptación sobresaliente a las co ndiciones del s uelo y de la a so ciación co n yuca en siembra simultán ea , mientra S que el tipo de planta y la adaptación del frij ol terciopelo s ugirieron potencial para asociarlo con yuca adulta, al final del ciclo vegetativo de la misma . De la s o tra s especies, parte no toleró las condiciones de extrema acidez, infe rtilidad y toxicidad por Al y Mn del suelo (mungo , frijol alado), y parte no mostró un hábito de creci miento adecuado para la asociación (gua ndul, canava lia s) (CIAT, 1979; Hege wald y Leihner, 1980).Respuesta a la fertilización en monocultivo y en asociación. La res puesta a los elementos ma yores por parte de la yuca y de los cultivos más frecuentemente asociados co n ella (legum inosas de grano, maíz) se estudió ampliamen te bajo co ndiciones muy variables de suelo, en monocultivo (Jaco b y v. Uexküll, 1973 ;Andrew y Ka mprath , 1978;H oweler, 1981). Sin em bargo, es importante reconoce r que la respuesta de los siste mas asociados pu ede diferir marcada me nte de la del monocu lti vo; en pruebas que se ha bian realiza d o en un suelo de mediana fertilidad de Caribia en la costa norte de Co lombi a (Cuadro 6), para establecer la respue sta a N yaK de la yuca y del caupí e n monocultivo ye n asociación, la yuca presentó un a diferencia fundamental en las respuestas a l N y al K e ntre los dos sistemas de cultivo.En mo nocultivo, el rendim ie nto en raíces po r parte de la yuca mostró una re spues ta positiva a la aplicación de N y K só lo hasta el primer incremento en la ferti lización , sie nd o la respuesta al N esta dí st icamente significa tiva ; a niveles más a lt os de los dos elementos, se obse rvó una declinación en el rendim iento ha sta un nivel má s bajo que el de los testigos (sin aplicación d e N y K) , siend o esta depresió n en el rendimiento estadí sticamente sig nifica ti va para el K. Con ambos elementos se inc rementó el crecimiento de los tall os y del fo llaj e; a sí , la reducción en los rendimien tos con la d os is altas de N y K posiblemente se debió a una di sminu ció n en el indice de cosecha, el cual frecuenta mente está relacionado con el excesivo crecimiento del follaje y con una área folia r ma yo r que la óptima (Cock et a l. , 1979).En cambio , en la yuca asociada la res pues ta e n re nd imien to de raíces a la aplicación del N y K fue positi va desde el segundo hasta el cua rto incremento del fertilizan te , siendo el incremento en los rendimientos estadist ica ment e significativo en el caso del N y ca si significativo en el K .El caupí , por su parte, no mostró un apreciab le grado de respue sta al N ni a l K , ni diferencia en la respuesta a estos elemen tos entre e l mo noc ultivo y la asociación. Al nivel de 84 kg/ ha de K hubo una reducc ión peculiar en el rendimient o del caupí tanto en mono-cultivo como asociado con yuca; esta reducció n, aunque significativa , probablemente no reOejó el verdadero efec to d e la aplicación de K, como quiera que los dos tratamiento s fuero n afectados selectivamente por una inundación en d os de las cuatro replicacio nes (Figuras 12 y 13).Al conducir los mi smos experimentos co n increme nt os d e Pen un s uelo altamente deficiente y fijador de P en CIAT-Quit ichao (Cuadro 6), se registró una situación diferente . En es ta s condici o nes, tanto la yuca como el caupí respo ndieron en forma posi tiva en sus rendimiento s a los incrementos de P, reOejand o ante tod o la seria deficiencia de este elemento en el suelo (Figura 14 ).La yuca en monocultivo mostró una res puesta casi lin ea l a los incrementos de P, a lcan za ndo el rendimient o má s a lt o con el nivel má s alto de ese elemento ; sin embargo, en asociació n con caupí respondió só lo hasta el primer incremento en la aplicaci ó n de P. Esta diferencia entre la yuca en m o nocult ivo y asoci ada se puede expli ca r tant o por una co mpetencia má s fuerte por P en tre las d os especies como por el hecho de que lo s ni ve les má s altos de P causaron un cambio drástico en la competitividad relati va de los dos cultivos en favor del caupí, el cual deprimió el rendimiento de la yuca a la ve z que mostró una marcada re spu es ta po sitiva al P en ambos sistemas de cultivo.De lo anterior se concluye que para asegurar el sumini stro adecuado y económico de nutrimentos para cult ivos asociad os, es importante co nocer la respuesta a ellos de cada cultivo en la asociación . Esta res puesta a veces presenta la mi sma tendencia en los monocultivos y en la asociación , como fue el caso del caupí con P en CIA T-Quilichao, pero también puede se r significa tivamente diferente, COmo en el caso de yuca con N y K en Caribia. Esto indica ría que nO es seguro derivar conclusiones sob re la fertili zació n de un sistema asocia do só lo a partir de los req uerimie nt os y de la respuesta a la fertilización de sus compo nentes en mo noc ultivo, sin o que es necesa rio est ud ia r directamente el sistema asociado en cuantú a su respuesta a los nutriment os y determinación de niveles ó pt imos en diferentes condic io nes de suelo. Competencia por nutrimentos en cultivos asociados. La co mpetencia por los nutrimentos del suelo en cultivos asociados puede involucrar un com plej ode factores, y ocurre c uand o las zo nas de absorción de dos o más plantas se entrecruzan . ESlo oc urre con mayo r frec ue nc ia y ra pideze n el ca so de nutrime ntos m óvi les, ya que e ll os puede n se r abso rbid os má s fácilmente y tambi é n se pueden mover con mayo r fac ilidad e n e l s uelo ; así, la s zonas donde es tos e leme nt os se agotan, a lrededor de las raíces, crecen mas rápidamente y se traslapan más pronto (Kurtz et al., 1952;Bray, 1954). La s diferencia s en los requerimientos nutri ciona les y en la efic iencia de la absorción pueden ocasionar compete ncia entre los cu ltivos comp o ne ntes de la asociación; la competenci a por un nutrimento puede a la vezalterar la habilidad de los cultivos en asociac ión para competir por lu z, agua y o tros nutrimentos.Los siste ma s radicales d e difere ntes es pec ies en cu ltivos asociados ti e nde n a no inte rferir e nt re si debi d o posiblemente tanto a un a ntago ni s mo entre las raíces como a la tendencia que e,i see en el c rec imi e nto de las mismas a evitar zonas donde la humedad se ha ago ta d o ( Rape r y Barber , 1970 ;Lita v y Wolovitch, 1971;Oa la l, 1974;T renbath , 1976). Es to podría ayudar a evitar la co m pe te ncia po r los elementos no móviles , pero al mis mo tie mp o res tringe el vo lu men del sue lo q ue p uede ser ex plo rado po r las raices.Tan to la es trat ificación de los sistem as radica les, o sea la ubicació n de ra íces de las diferentes especies en d ifere ntes profundidades d el suelo, co mo la separción espa cial hor izo nta l de las raíces podrí a ayud a r a red ucir la competencia po r n utrime nt os (Ca ble , 1968;Cha ng, 1969).En la práct ica, la co mpetencia e ntre especies se p rese nta co mo u na red ucción e n el desarro ll o vege ta ti vo y e n la producti vidad . La co m pete nc ia ta m bién puede afec ta r la co nce ntrac ió n d e nutrime ntos e n los tejidos de las plantas. La med ida d el crecimie nt o y d el re nd imie nt o, la res puesta a la aplicació n d e nutrime ntos y el a ná lisis d irec to de tejid o s son , po r lo tanto , herra mie ntas útiles pa ra eva luar y cuantifica r la co mpete ncia . Co m o eje mpl o, la res puesta a l N de la yuca c ulti vad a so la y asoc iada con ca upí q ue p rese nta la F igura 12 mues tra que la yuca sufrió la co mpe te ncia de l caupi po r ese elemento; e n ca mbi o la fa lta de res puesta a l N que se observa en el ca upi , y la mínima dife re ncia e ntre e l rend imi en to de grano en el sistem a d e mo noc ulti vo y de aso cia ción , sugiere q ue es ta especie no sufrió co mpe tencia po r parte de la yu ca po r ese el emento . El hech o a nteri o r se ex plica p roba blemente no ta nt o po r la capacidad d e fij ac ió n d e N , q ue es má s bien limitad a en el ca u pí, sin o co m o res ult ado de la rá pid a expansión la tera l yen pro fu nd idad de sus ra ices, qu e puede ha ber habi litado a es ta especie para tomar N de ni veles del suelo no explo rados por las ra ices de la yuca '.U na sit uac ió n semejante se obse rvó en el caso de la competencia po r K : el ma rcado incremento en los rendim ientos que se obtuvo en la yuca asociada en presenc ia de nive les altos d e este ele ment o sugiere que el mismo p udo se r de algún m odo limi ta ti vo en la s asociaciones con nive les bajos, y que esta sit uac ió n se co rrigió a pli ca ndo niveles más a ltos (ver Figura 13). Aq uí de nu evo el caupí no res po ndi ó a las ap li cacio nes de K co n un a u me n to sig ni fica t ivo e n s u rendimi e nt o, de d o nde se infi e re q ue pro ba bl eme nte no sufrió co mpetencia po r ese ele ment o. En el caso del p, ambos cu ltivos mostraro n una respues ta posi tiva a los niveles altos del elemento, sugiriend o que como resultado del muy baj o contenido de P en el suel o y de la alta ca pacidad de fijación d e ese elemento, hu bo una fuerte co mpeten cia entre a mb os por el fert ilizante fosfórico.La respuesta particular de la yuca en asociac ió n co n caupi reve la la difere nte tolerancia de las dos especies al P bajo en el sue lo: adi cionando poco P la yuca, que es la especie má s tole rante, m os tró una respuesta pos itiva , pero no presentó la mi sma respue sta con los niveles má s a lt os de P. Con mayores cantidades de fe rtili zante fo sfóric o el caupí se hizo más competitivo y causó una depresión en el rendimiento de la yuca, llegando a los mayo res re ndimientos en grano só lo con el últim o incremento de P (ver Figura 14).Com o po drí a n suge rir las curvas de respuesta , ni siquiera el más alto nivel d e P pod ría haber provisto suficiente ca ntidad de este nutriment o para co rregi r la si tuación de competencia y satisfacer la demanda de P por parte de ambos cultivos en asoc iació n con igual efectividad que en mo nocultivo (CIAT, 1980).Se reconoce también po r medio del análisis de tejid os cuándo un cultivo en asociaci ó n sufre competencia por nutriment os en comparación con el mo noc ultivo. Los datos del análisi s foliar confirm a n las observac iones hecha s sobre competencia en los e nsayos sobre respuesta s a N, P Y K de la yuca y el caupí e n monoc ultivo y asociados. En los C uad ros 7 y 8las concentraciones má s bajas de N y K en la s hojas y peciol os dela yuca asociada muestran que el caupi Cuadro 7. Efecto de dife rentes niveles de N aplicados en banda sob re la co ncenlración de ese elemenlo en la s hojas de yuca y caupi se mbrados en monocultivo y en asociación .Conce ntración de N en las hojas (%) compitió co n ella po r estos elementos si n que el mi sm o se afectara po r la co mpetenc ia. Por ot ra parte, la concent ración de P en los tejidos de la yuca y del ca upi asoc iados rue reduc ida, lo que indi ca una fue rte competencia de ambos cultivos por el p. sie ndo la yuca apa re nt e me nt e más afectada que e l ca upi. El hec ho de que a má s altos niveles de P aumente la co nce ntració n de ese ele me nt o e n las hoja s del ca upi asociad o sin que aumente en la yuca asociada, sugeriría q ue a medida q ue aume ntan los ni ve les d e P, el ca upi se vuel ve un competid o r má s fuerte d ejando menos P di spo nible pa ra la yuca (Cuad ro 9) . Métodos de aplicación de fertilizante s. En cultivos asociados, al igual que en mon ocultivos el método de apl ica ción del fertilizante está determinado por las características del suelo, el régimen pluviométrico, el tipo de fertilizante y los cu lti vos mi smos.Por ejemplo, en un suelo arenoso el fertili zan te ap licado a l voleo está más expuesto a pérdida por lavado que si se aplica en banda. Los sue los ácidos tropicales frecuentemente fijan p. y cuando se les aplican al voleo fuen tes solubles de ese elemento se co rre el riesgo de perderlo; de nuevo, la aplicación en banda podría prevenir mejor dicho riesgo. En un Oxisol de Carimagua, en lo s Llanos Orientales de Colombia , se obtuvo el mejor resultado con yuca sembrada sobre caballones durante la época lluviosa, 'aplicando la mitad del fertiliza nte al voleo y la otra mitad en banda ; con la sie mbra e n plano en la época seca , fue mejor la aplicación de todo el fertilizante a l voleo (H owe ler , 1981).En general, los correctivos del suelo de baja sol ubilidad , como la cal agrícola, la cal dolo mítica, la s escoria s Th omas o rocas fosfóricas actúan con mayor eficacia cuando se aplican al voleo (con incorporación) para crear la más amplia s uperficie posi ble de conta cto entre e l correct ivo y el s uelo , mientras que los fertili za ntes de, alta co ncentració n y so lubilid ad generalmente so n aprovechad os más eficientemen te por los cult ivos cuando se aplican en bandas.Los cultivos anua les asociados con yuca. tales como las leguminosas de grano o el maíz, tienen sistemas radicales profundos y ramificados. En cont raste ,la yuca tiene un sistema radical más bien escaso con un pequeño número de pelos absorbentes, pero la asociación con micorrizas le ayuda en la absorción de P y posiblemente de otros nutrimentos y del agua (Howeler, 1981). Est o implica que la eficiencia en la abso rción por parte de la yuca p od ri a se r si milar a la de los cultivos asociados co n ella, a pesar de la di si militud morfológica de sus sistema s radicales. Por consiguiente , el método de aplicación del fertilizante en cultivos asoc iad os se podría regir má s por las condiciones del s uelo y del clima y por el tipo del fertilizante a apli car que por las características de absorción de los cultivos.Los resultados obte nid os en Quilichao y Ca ribi a co n la ap licació n de NPK al vo leo y en banda en asociaciones de yuca y caupi confirman la observación anterior. En Quilichao , aplicando el P en' la forma so lubl e de superfosfa to triple en un sue lo fijador de ese elemento, el caupí respondió ligera aunque no significat ivame nte mejor a la aplicac ión en banda que a la aplicación al voleo mientras En Ca ribia , aplica ndo N en la fo rm a so lubl e d e urea , se ob tu viero n dife re ncias no sig nifica ti vas en los re nd imi e ntos d el ca upí co n la a plicac ió n en ba nda y a l vo leo; la y uca respo nd ió mej o r a la a plicació n a l voleo, lo c ua l se po dría re lac io nar co n una mejo r a bso rció n d el ele me nto asi a plicad o, debid o a su siste ma radi ca l escaso (Figura 16). Fina lmente, en el caso del K , ap li cad o co m o clo r uro de po tasio, ni la yuca ni el ca u pi most raro n d ife rencias clara s comparando los d os m é todos de a pl icación (C IA T , 1980).Conclusiones para la fertilización . La ex tracc ió n y re moc ió n d e cas i todos los nutr ime ntos es ma yor e n un siste ma asociad o q ue e n mo noc ultivo c ua nd o el manej o es inte nsivo . Po r lo ta nt o, la nu t rició n d e las pl a ntas asocia das requie re es pecia l a te nción para ev ita r que la fe rtilida d de l s uelo se ago te ráp ida me nt e. Las o bservac io nes hec has has ta a ho ra in d ica n que: oc urrir , en men o r g rado, eo a sociacio nes co n ma iz. Po r esto, la fe rtili zació n con N parece ser decisiva pa ra una pro ducción estable del siste ma asociad o. La práctica adecuada eo este ca so pOdrí a se r suma r los requerimientos individuales de los cu ltivos pa ra llega r a la ca ntidad t o tal de N con que se debe fertilizar el sistem a asociado . Aunque esta reco mendaci ó n parece sugerir el emple o de grand es cantidades de fertiliz ante nitroge nado, ta les cant idades pueden resultar relativamente baja s e n la práctica si la yuca se inte rca la repetidamente con leg umin osas eficientes en la fijación de N . Esta práctica no so lamente red ucirá la cantidad de N requeri d o po r el cultivo asoc iad o sin o qu e a largo pla zo proba bl emente ayudará también a acumul a r N e n el s uel o , lo que a su vez reducirá 'Ios reque rimie ntos de fertilización nit roge nada po r parte de la yuca.b) La yuca y los cultivos asoc iados só lo remueve n peq ueñ as .cantidades de P del suelo: sin embargo , en muchos suelos po bre s, tanto la yuca como la s leguminosas y el maí z respo nd en má s a la fertili zación co n P que con otros element os, lo que significa que en estos suelos el reque rimiento de P es elevado pa ra los t res grupos de cultivos. La dependencia de un sumini stro adec uad o de P por pa rte de las legumin osas y el maí z es aún ma yor que la de la yuca , cultivo que tiene mayo r tole ranci a a bajas co ncentracio nes de ese e lement o en el suelo . Co nsiderando por una part e la poca re moci ó n de P en la asociación , y po r otra la marcada respues ta a este e lement o so bre todo de los cu ltivos asoc iad os , se es tima que una apro piada fertiliza ció n con P debería cubrir en prime r lu gar el requerimi ent o del cu lti vo asociado. La yuca se benefificaría de esta aplicación en ma yor o menor grado, y po r lo tanto posibleme nte no sea necesario aplicarle toda la cantidad de P que se le aplicarí a en condiciones de mo noculti vo.c) La extracción y remoción de K por la s raíces de la yuca es co nsi de rable y hace necesaria la devo l ució n de este ele mento al suel o mediante la fertilización.En un sistema asociado predomina la remoción de K por parte de la yuca , y no se observa mucha remoci ó n por el cultivo a sociado: por otra pa rte, la respuesta a ese e lemento en los rendimient os de la yuca y cultivos as ocia dos normalmente no es muy marc ada. Por lo tanto, la fertilizaci ó n co n K de un sist ema a soc iad o se deb e regir principa lmente por el requerimiento de la yuca, agregá nd o le una peq ueña ca ntidad de fertilizante como margen de segu ridad para el cultivo asociado. d) En suelos á cid os e infértil es , se recomienda sembrar co mo c ulti vos asociados con yuca só lo aq uell as espec ies que co mo el caupi y el mani, tengan un a ad apt ació n a ese medi o simila ra la de la yuca . En es ta fo rma no se requiere la co rrección del pH mediante grandes can tid ades de ca l sino só lo una peq ueña dosis para sati sfacer la demand a de Ca y Mg como nutrimentos. Se reco mi e nda aplicar en pres iembra e incorpo rados, 500 kg/ha deca l a grico la , o mejo rcal dolomitica (que incluye Mg) . Ad emás , 10 kg/ ha de Zn y 1 kg/ ha de B cubren los req uerimiento s de los dos elementos meno res más import a ntes para la as oci ación en es tos sue los. Fu e nt es co mercia les de N y K ta les co mo la urea y e l c lo ruro de po tas io mos tra ro n efecti vidad simil a r c ua nd o se a plica ro n e n ba nd a o a l voleo e n sistemas asociad os de yuca y ca upi .Elementos menores tales como el Zn y el B se puede n aplicar en banda ; pero en el caso de la yuca, tambi én exi ste la posibilidad de aplicarlos po r aspersión a l cultivo (apli cació n foliar) o co mo tra ta mien to a la estaca , lo eual es más eco nó mico q ue la a pli cació n a l suelo.Los b ro tes e pid é mic os d e pestes (plaga s, e nfe rm edades y mal ezas) co nstitu ye n una d e las más seria s amen azas pa ra la p roducc ió n agrícola en el tró pico. Las e pide mia s son favorec idas po r c ul t ivos mo rfo ló gica y ge né tica mente uniformes ( mo noc ulti vos) de gran exte nsió n (Pim entel, 19 6 1; So uthwood y Wa y, 1970; Ni c kel, 197 3). En cambi o, la mezcla d e cultivos con base gen é tica dife rent e (n o nece sa ri a me nte co n diferen cias morfo lógi cas) e n el mis mo campo no pro vee el sustra to uniforme pa ra que las peste s se multiplique n y adquiera n dimensio nes epidémicas. Se cree qu e esta es una d e las causas pa ra la mayo r es ta bilid a d d e los sistema s de c ulti vo mixto (De mpste r y Coa ke r, 19 74; L it singer y M oody , 1976; Altie ri e t a l. , 19 78) .Con exce pción de mu y pocos eje mpl os ( Bo d kin , 1912;Ra o , 1970), la yuca y los c ulti vos más frecuent e me n te asoc ia d os con ella so n a taca dos po r pl agas difere ntes; esto dis minu ye la pro ba bi lidad d e que la po bla ció n d e plagas au ment e y ocasio ne d a ños e n los c ulti vos asoc iad os. gene ral, hubo menor incidencia d e lodas estas plagas e n la asociació n. y se obse rvaro n poblacione s más bajas como resul tado de la combinación entre la asociación y el conl ro l quí mico co n pesticidas. En el Cuad ro 10 se mueSlra el resullad o de los cOnleos para cada insecto en los dos sislemas de culli vo co n protección química y sin ella. y se dan pro medi os de la reducción e n la incidencia de la plaga porefeclO de la asociación. en términos de porce ntaje. De la misma ma ne ra , en frijol asociado se observan incidencia s reducidas del sal ta hoj as (Empoasco kraemeri) , de dos crisomé lid os (Diobrorica bol/ea 10 y Cero/ama ruficornis) y de Irips. e n comparación con el monocultivo. Es tas o bserva ciones han sid o con fi rmadas por dat os oble nid os e n Cos la Rica (Ara uj o y More no, 1978).Los datos a nt e ri o res además de indi ca r el potencial del sistema asociado para el conl ro l de pla gas, en a use ncia d e o tras medidas, sug ie re n que es posible co mpl ementar el sis tema de producción asociada con medidas moderadas de co nlro l quimico para o ble ner a ún mejo res resullados. Cuando e n un mo nocu lti vo comercial se requi eren cuatro a seis aplicaciones de un pes ti cida, e n la asoc iació n puede n se r sufi cie nt es una o d os.En la asociación de yuca con fr ij o l a que se refie re el Cuadro 10, el rendimi e nt o de la yuca se redujo poco por efeclO del frijol asociado c ua ndo no se hizo co ntrol químico de insectos, y los re ndimien tos del frijol asoc iado fuero n casi idénlicos a los del mo noculti vo. Asi, e n a use nc ia de insumos para el co ntro l de in sec tos, la asociación fue ve ntaj osa, ya que en un a hectárea se ob tu vo cas i la mis ma prod ucción d e yuca y frijol que se hubiera ob tenid o en dos hec tá re as de estos cultivos por se parad o . Los re sultados mues tran la gran ve ntaja d e la asoc iació n baj o condiciones de uso mínimo de ins umos comprados (T hung, 1978).La divers idad ge nética entre los c ulti vos que se siembran e n asociación es uno de los fact o res más importantes que pueden modificar la incidencia y severidad de la s enfe rm edades; por ot ra parte, la disimilitud m orfoló gica entre las plantas p ued e prod ucir efeCtOS adiciona les, por ejemplo, la formación de barreras co ntra patógenos diseminados por el viento o el ag ua .Sin embargo. ha y que diferenciar en tre pa tóge nos y combinaciones de c ultivos , ya que hay casos de efect os patogén icos adversos en c ulti vos asociad os con la yuca y viceversa . Así, según info rmacio nes desd e Sri La nka , la asociación de yuca co n ca uch o fome nta la secticida y sin ella. (1979) informa sobre incidencia y severidad d e la ceniza d e la yuca (Oidium maniholis) en yuca asociada con maíz, mayor que la obse rvada en el respec livo mo nocultivo ; Lozano (comunicación personal, 1981) sostiene que lanlO la yuca como el frijo l son atacados por los mismos pa tógenos del suelo tales como los de los géneros Rhizoclonia, Se/erolillia, Se/erO/ium, Fusarium. Vertidllium y Fomes, causanles de pudriciones d e la raiz o del hipocó tilo.Sin e m bargo, eslas sil uaci ones se deben co nsiderar como excepciones, ya que se puede cit ar un núme ro de ejemplos mucho ma yo r que muestra el efecto favorable de los cultivos asociados sobre la reducción de la incidencia y severidad de enfermedades.Larios y M oreno (1976) y Moreno (1979) a nali za ron la situación patogénica de diferenles asociaciones con yuca. Los dos autores encontraron que la asociación yuca-mai z retra sa el desa rro llo del superalargamiento de la yuca (Elsinoii brasiliensis) y al mismo tiempo reduce la incidencia y severidad de la roya (Uromyces \",allihotis). Los mismos autores confirmaron que la asociac ió n de yuca con frijo l común reduce la incidencia y severid ad de la cen iza de la yuca, el superalargamiento , la roya (Cuadro 11) Y la ant racnosis (Collelolrichum sp.) bajo con diciones de Turrialba, Costa Rica, Dos informes de Nigeria (Arene, 1976;Ene, 1977) muestran qu e en asociaciones de yuca con maí z y melón el añub lo bacte ri a l de la yuca (Xanlhomotlas maniholis) se redujo ; la posible explicación de este hecho es q ue la asoc iac ió n provee una mejor y más temprana co bertura del sue lo , la cual evita las sa lpic aduras de sue lo infectado por la bacteria (Cuadro 12).Cuadro 11 . Incidencia y severidad máximas de la ro ya de la yuc a (Uromyces moniholis) en cin co sistem as diferentes de culti\\ ' La yuca ta mbi é n influye so bre la situa ció n pa togéOl ca d e los culti vos asoc iados e n forma dife re nte según el pató gen o y e l cullivo. Al parecer no existen info rm es sobre cambios en la incidenc ia de e nfermedades e n maíz intercalado co n yuca pero sí los hay so bre frijol y caupí . More no (1979) ss Moren o ( 19 79) también estudió la infestación del ca upi por enfe rmedades vira les co mo el mosaico co mún yel mosa ico clorótico del caupí , las cuales son tran smitidas po r c ri so mélidos. En la siembra simultánea de caupí con yuca no se o bservó diferencia a lguna entre el progreso de la e nfermedad vi ral en la asociación y en el monocultivo de caupí; sin embargo, cuand o és te se se mbró baj o la yuca completame nte desarro ll ada , a l final de su ciclo vegetativo, se redujo tanlO el progreso como el grado de máxima infecc ión de las dos virosis en co mpa ración co n el mo noculti vo. La reducida actividad de los vectores en co ndiciones de reducida incidencia de radiació n so lar baj o la yuca fue la causa má s pr obable de es ta baja in cidencia viral e n la asociació n yuca-ca upi .Los eje mpl os citados demuestra n, en términos ge nerales, el po lencial de la asociació n con yuca para reducir los prob lem as de enfermedades. Esto significa que , para el man ejo de enfer medades en cu ltivos asociados con yuca, a l ig ua l que para el ma nejo de plaga s, hay me nor requerimiento de in sum os agroq uím icos para su con trol. Sin emba rgo, la asociació n indiscriminada de c ultivos que puedan tene r uno o más pa tógen os e n común, pu ede favorecer el desarrollo de problemas patogénicos bajo co ndi cio nes específicas . EslO se debe tene r en cuenta pa ra un manejo adecuado de la s enfermedades e n siste mas de cul ti vos asociados, evita nd o la asociació n de especies con potencia I•para agra var más que para ah viar lo s proble mas de enfermedade s.Una de las ve ntajas de se mbra r s imultánea mente dos o má s c ulti vos e n el mismo campo es obtener una ma yor y más te mprana cobertura del suelo , lo qu e reduce la penetra ció n de lu z me rm a nd o , a su vez, el crecimi ento de las ma lezas . eleave ( 1974) o pina que los sistema s de cultivos a sociados pueden ha ber surgid o específicamente como res ultado del reducido co ntrol de malezas que ell os requie ren.Potencial biológico para reducir problemas de malezas. En el sistema de mo noculti vo el espa cio no cubierto inicialmente po r el follaje de la yuca co nstituye un problema particularmente serio debid o a l lent o desa rro ll o inicia l de l culti vo y al amplio es paciamiento que requiere para acom odar su crecimient o poster ior. De a hi que un cultivo asociado que c ubra rápidam ente el suelo sin competir exces ivamente co n la yuca puede hacer una cont ribución impo nante a l control cultural de las maleza s en yu ca. 56 CIAT ( 1979( ) Y Leih ner ( 1980a) ) ana lizaron el c recimie nt o de male zas e n el mo noc ulti vo de yuca comparado co n e l c rec imi e nt o e n la asociación yuca-frij o l, e n e l CIAT, Colombia. A los 45 , 90 Y 135 di as después de la siemb ra y si n ot ra clase de co ntrol, el solo hecho de interca la r la yuca con el frij o l ha bía reducid o la ca n tidad to tal d e la s mal ezas a 30 , 4 7 Y 33% de la ca ntidad obse rva d a e n el monoc ultivo. El reducid o peso de las malezas a los 135 días indica q ue hub o un efecto residua l del co ntro l eje rcido por e l frijol , ya que éste se había cosec had o a los 105 días. Sólo a los 180 día s des pu és de la siembra, la cantidad de majeza s bajo las co ndici ones de la asociación yuca -frijol alcanzó el mi s mo nivel que en el m o n oc ulti vo (Figura 17).En el sistema asociado, la yu ca tuvo un rendimiento igua l con o sin medid as adicionales de control quimi co y manu a l, mie n tras que e n el mo noc ultivo sufri ó una merma de 30% e n su re ndimie nt o cua nd o no hubo control químico o ma nua l de las malezas. Estos resultados resaltan nuevamen te la ventaja del cult ivo intercalado en cua nto a la estab ilidad de la producci ón en condiciones de uso mínimo de in s um os comprados, lo que a la vez sugiere que los cultivos asociados podrían ser un sistema de producción adecuado para el pequeño productor quien normalmen te carece de medios pa ra co mprar in sumos. (Véase ta mbién lo concerniente a manej o de plagas en sistema s asociados).Asoc iando la yuca con una legumin osa perenne (Desmodium helerophyllum) se o btu vo un co ntrol de maleza s efectivo y estable . Después del es tablecimient o de la legumin osa. que duró unos 50 día s, la cobe rtura del suelo y el con trol de ma lezas fu ero n co mpletos hasta la cosecha de la yuca. Hub o una reducción de 18.9% en el re ndimien to de la y uca asoc iada con es ta leguminosa en comparación con el del monocultivo limpi o, debido posiblemente a la baja pero prolongada competencia del cultivo de cobertura ; sin embargo, ese puede se r un prec io relativamente bajo que se paga por man tener el cu lti vo libre de male zas du ra nte todo su cicl o vegetativo (CI AT, 197'9;Leihner, 1980a).Control químico de malezas. El fact o r má s limitativo para el uso de he rbicidas en asociaciones de culti vos con yuca ha sido la falta de información so bre selecti vidad y efec tividad de los prod uct os cuando se usan en sistemas de cultivos asociados. La deficiencia de la información se debe a que us ua lme nte los herbi cidas han si do desarrollados para monocultivos come rcia les e n g ran esca la , y no para los cul tivos ali menti cios del peq ueño productor . Tenie nd o esto en c ue nta, se inici ó una investigaci ón tendiente a id ent ificar productos o mezcla s de prod uctos, d os is y mé todos de ap licación aconsejables para el control químico de maleza s e n cu lti vos interca lados con yuca. Como resultado se han iden tificado a lgunos herbicidas pree me rge ntes que se pueden usare n asoc iaciones de yuca co n maíz y también con frijol co mún , ca upí , mungo y mani (López y Leihner , 1980). Una de las mezclas ide ntificadas también se puede usa r en la triple asociació n de yuca con maíz y ñame (Cuadro 14).Adem ás de usar he rbic idas con se lec ti vidad pa ra diferentes cu ltivos , el agricultor se puede valer de o tros principios para o btener ma yo r se lec ti vidad, como son el uso de los herbi cidas en do sis bajas y su a pli cació n en presiembra . El uso de dosis bajas (ej. la mitad de la d os is) disminuye el riesgo de un efec to fitotóxico en' los c ultivos, pero también merm a la eficiencia y duración del cont ro l de las ma lezas ; sín e mbargo, el sistema asociado provee a l suelo una Fuente: López 'J Leihncr. 1980 cobertura má s temprana que el monocultivo•, reduciend o así la necesidad de un efectivo co ntro l de male zas durante un período prol o ngado.Con respecto al tiempo de apli cació n , se obtiene mej or selectividad cuan d o los herbicida s pree me rgentes no se aplican inmediatamenle despué s de la siembra d e acuerd o con la práctica t radicio nal, sino algun os días o inclusive has ta varias semana s anle s; esto es posible sobre todo con los herbici das preemergentes de efecto residual pro lo ngado. En el CIA T, po r ejemplo , se ob servó uo n o to ri o aumento e n la se lectividad de un he rbicida preemergente (o xiOuorfen) c uand o se a pl icó antes d e la siembra e n una asociac ió n de yuca y maní en lugar de hacerl o d espués.Control integrado de maJezas. Frecuentemen te la combinación de varios métod os provee may or eficiencia y economía e n el con trol. En el CIAT se obtuvo un contro l efec tivo y económic o de malezas en un cultivo de yuca asociad o co n frijo l común, aprovechando el efect o de la cobertura tempran a de l frijol y co mpleme n tándolo co n la aplicaci ó n de un herbicida pree mergente , el c ual tambié n se aplicó a l m o noculti vo de yuca. Mientras el efecto de l co nl ro l eje r-S9 cido por el herbicida so lo en e l monocultivo de yuca se había perdid o antes de los 90 días después de la siemb ra , el efec to integ rado de la a soc iac ión y e l he rbicida mantu vo un excelen te control de maleza , (Figura 18) por má s de seis meses después d e la sie mbra (CIAT, 1 97~; Leihner , 1980a).El contro l integrad o de mal ezas ta mbi é n se probó e n la estación experimental ICA-Caribia en la costa norte de Colo mbia, dond e pred o mina el coq uito (Cyperus l'otulldus L.) , una ma leza difícil de co mba tir. Parcelas fu e rt emente infestad as de coq uit o (2300 tubérculos/m' a 25 cm de profundi ad) se sometie ro n a trat a mient os mecá ni cos, químicos y cu lturales de co ntro l d e male zas. Los métod os mecá nicos consi stiero n en ras t rillar dura nte la época seca con el soo 1 U MS sr¡. fin de expo ner los tub é rculos a la desecación antes de la siembra; el control químico se hi zo aplicando herbicidas pre' y pose mergentes' , y el co nt rol cul t ura l se erectuó con diferentes grados de somb ra para e l coq uito e n c ua tro tra ta mientas: monocultivo de yuca, asociación yuca-mungo , monocultivo de mungo , y sin cultivo (Figura 19).En el monoc ultivo de yuca, a los 60-90 días después de la sie mbra se logró una cobe rtura del suelo de 80% o más , y se mantuvo en un 80-100% ha sta la cosecha. La forma ció n del follaje fue má s rápida con glifosa to que sin él, y el tratamiento de ra strillada má s glifosato permiti ó la cobertura más temprana.El propósit o de la a sociación de yuca con mungo en este experiment o fue proveer u na cobertura más temprana al suelo de la que es pos ible obtene r con el so mbrío del mon ocultivo de yuca, antes de que los tra ta mie ntos de presiembra pierdan su efectividad. La asociación cumplió su propósito , ya que solamente 30 día s después de la siembra produjo un a co bertura del suelo de 80-90% independientemente de la ra strillada o del tratamiento co n herbicida .Po r su rápid o crecimiento el mungo en monocultivo cubrió rápidamente el suelo, pero la cobertura no se man tu vo por much o ti empo debido a s u COrto ciclo vegetat ivo (Figura 19). En el mo nocultivo de yuca se ob tuvo un control bue no y estable de la maleza con el tratamiento comb inado de la rastrillada y el glifosato . ya que el co ntrol eje rcido por la sombra de la y uca se hizo efectivo a ntes de que los tratamientos de presie mbra perdieran su efecto . No obstante , una comparación entre los sistemas de siembra reveló que la a soc iació n yuca-mungo proveyó el control más temprano y más efect ivo de todos los sistema s (eIAT, 1980;Leihner et al. , 1980). El sistema de cultivos asociadqs se adopta tanto po r razones b io lógicas como eco nómi cas. Es bien sabido que un área sembrada con dos o má s cultivos en asociación puede dar una producción to tal más alta que los cu ltivos por se parado en la misma superficie. Sin embargo, la productividad biológica de un sistema de producción agrícola no es el ú ni co aspecto importante: el res ultad o económi co de una asociación en relación con el obtenid o en monoc ultivo es o tro aspecto decisivo en la evaluación de un sistema de producción.Mientra s en la agricultura de subsis tencia la ma yor parte de la produ cción agríco la se consume en la finca y por lo tanto, la produc tividad biológica es de especial importanc ia, bajo condiciones de tra nsició n de agricultura de su bsistencia a comercial, donde cantidades crecientes del produ cto agrícola se venden fuera de la finc a, el res ultado económico recibe ca da vez mayo r atención .Para la evaluación de la eficiencia biológica de los sistema s de cultivos asociados, la cual corresponde al mis mo t ie mpo a la eficiencia en el uso de la tierra, el IRRI (1973IRRI ( , 1974) Y Mead y Willey, (1980) han propuesto el concepto del \"lndice Eq uiva lente de Tierra\" (IET). Este es út il para expresa r y evaluar: a) La ventaja o desve ntaja, en términos de producción biológica, de la asociación en compa rac ión con el monoc ulti vo (criterio de máxi ma producción). b) La eficiencia o ineficiencia de un sistema comparado co n o tro con respecto al uso de la tierra (criterio de menor área). c) La ventaja o desventaja de una combinación de cultivos sobre otra (comparación entre combinaciones de c ultivos). d ) La ventaja o desventaja de una práctica agronómica sobre otra dentro del sistema asociad o (comparación entre prácticas agronómicas) . e) También sirve para valorar la co mpetencia entre los cultivos, como se verá más adelante. Si se conside ran individualmente [os rend imientos de cada una de las especies incluida s en una asociación , se encuentra que ellos son mayores en e[ monocultivo que en la asociación, debido -\" [a competencia interespecífica en el último sistem a; por [o tant o, en el monocultivo de una especie se necesita un área menor que en la asoc iación para obte ner producciones similares, lo que se manifiesta en va lores A/M menores que la unidad (A/ M <1 l. Sin embargo, si se considera la producción biológica total de la asociació n, se e nc uentra que para igualarla con los monocultivos habda que sum a r [as áreas que éstos ocupan: a sí, el área total requerida para una producción total determinada resulta mayor en e[ sistema de monocultivo que en la asociación. 64Con la ayuda de la metod o logía ex pues ta, a ho ra es posible eval uar, a la luz del concepto rET, algunas de la s prá cti cas agronómicas mejoradas pa ra las asociaci o nes co n yuca, las cuales co nstituyen el pri ncipal objetivo de la pre sente publicació n.Tiempo relativo de siembra.Pa ra la asociación de yuca y frijol, se determinaron e n el C rA T los IET cor respondi en tes a diferente s ép ocas relativas de siembra, y generalmente se obtuvieron valores más a lt os se mbrando el frijo l antes de la yuca. Es to se debió probablemente a que la s sie mbras tempranas de frij o l, a la vez que permitieron mayores rendimientos de es ta especie, tuvieron un efecto de competenc ia menor q ue el ejercido po r la sie mbra ta rdí a del mismo frijol sobre los rendimientos de la yuca (ver Figu ra 3 para re ndimien tos relativos).El má ximo valor rET se ob tu vo con la siembra si multán ea, lo que indica una ventaja comparativa para esta práctica y confirma que con ella se o btiene la más alta productividad biológica to tal ( Figura 20) .Para ca lcula r los rET que prese nta la Fi gura 20 se usaron los rendimientos de monocultivos sembrados en las co rres pondientes fecha s de siembra de la asociació n, co n el fin de corregir el efec to de esa fec ha sob re el re ndimie nto del frij o!. En esta forma no se hace una comparación entre asociación y mon oc ulti vo sin o entre las diferentes fechas relativas de siembra de la asociación. Para determinar el efecto de la dens idad de siembra de la yuca sobre la productividad total y efici en cia del sistema intercalado, se sembró en el ClA T una co mbinación de dos variedades de yuca con dos variedades de frijol (ver Figura 5 para rendimientos relativos). En tres de las cuatro comb in ac iones se encontró un JET relativamente constant e a lo largo de un amplio rango de densidades de yuca , lo que indica que en la asociación se pueden usar las densidades normales de l monocultivo si n perjudicar la eficiencia del siste ma asociado (Thung, 1978;C lAT , 1979).La misma ob servación se hizo en CJAT-Quilichao donde se probaron diferentes den sidades de caupi en asociaci ó n con yuca. Pa ra el cálculo de los valores IET, en el caso de la yuca se tomó el promedio de los rendimie ntos del monocultivo , ya que para éste se usa ron parcelas está nd a r; para el caso del caupi se tomó el rendimien to del mejor t rata miento, pa ra permiti r una verdadera co m para ción entre las eficiencias del monoculti vo y la asociac ió n. EllET del sistema se mantuvo cas i estab le para densidades de siembra del ca u pi en tre 7 y 15 plan tasi m'; esto confirma que en el ca u pi , a l igua l que en la yuca. el uso en la asociación de las densidades corrientes de l monocultivo (8 -11 plantas/ m') no ocasiona detrimento en la eficiencia del si stema y a la vez asegu ra a lta prod ucti vi dad (Figura 21 ). Cua nd o un culti vo res ponde positi va me nte a la fertili za ción , esta respuesta puede tener la misma proporción e n la asociación y en el monocultivo, en cuyo caso los incrementos e n la fe rtili zación producen una diferen cia con stante entre los rendimientos del monocultivo y de la asociación. Pero la respu es ta también puede ser más pronunciada en e l mon oc ulti vo, donde no ha y compet e ncia po r nutrimentos por parte de o tra especie, lo qu e co nduce a una ventaja cada vez mayo r e n e l rendimient o del monoc ultivo a medida que se incrementa el nivel de fertilizaci ó n. Como re su ltad o, al incre ment a r el ni ve l de fertilización el IET indi vidua l de un cultivo en la asociación permanece co nstante o baja.Con una competencia fuerte por nutrimentos entre los co mponente s de la asociación, y baj o condicione s de baja fertilidad y grandes aplica cion es de fertilizante para compensa rla , se puede presentar un tercer caso en que el grado de respuesta a la fert ili zación sea mayor en la asocia ción que en los mon ocu ltivos, lo que conduce a incrementos en el IET a medida que se increme nta la fertili zación.Por otra parte, el IET del sistema también es afectado por los ca mbi os que oc urren en la co mpete ncia entre los cultivos asociados c uand o la fertilidad del sue lo se incrementa . En una asociación de maíz y soya, altos nivele s de N incrementaron drás ticamente la capacidad competitiva del maíz frente a la soya, causa ndo una reducción significativa e n el rendimiento de esta última. Com o consecuencia el IET total del siste ma disminuyó co n cad a increme nto de N (Cordero y McCoJlum , 1979).Una situa ció n similar se observó con incrementos de P e n una asociación yuca-caupi sembrada e n CIAT-Quilichao. A partir del segundo nivel de P , el caupi se volvió más com petitivo fren te a la yuca, mostrando la misma re sp ues tél en su rendimi ento en asociación y en monocultivo y ca usando a la ve z una depresión en el rendimiento de la yuca. Esto dio como resultad o un pequeño aumento y la posterior estabilización del JET' del sistema a partir del segundo incremento de P , sugiriendo que el nivel óptimo de P para una ma yo r eficiencia en el uso de la lierra fue de 22 kg/ ha (Figura 22A). sist e ma de a sociaci ó n yuca-ca upí fe rtili zand o con nive les crec ientes de N. La yuc a, que e n mo noc ulti vo res pondió e n forma nega tiva a inc re me ntos de N , tuvo una fuert e re sp uest a positiva en la asociación, al ca nzando va lores de IE T indi viduales s upe ri o res a un o. Es ta c irc un s tanc ia y la fa lta de resp ue sta d el cau pi, el c ual mantuvo una rel ac ión con stante entre los rendim ie ntos e n mon oc ulti vo y en a soc ia c ió n p a ra todos los ni ve les de N , condujeron a un incremento d el IET del siste ma a partir del pri mer incremento de N has ta alcanzar va lo res ce rcanos a 2 en los ni ve les má s a ltos del elem en to (Fi g ura 22B) .La alta efi ciencia en e l aprovechamiento de la fe rtili zació n nitrogenada e n la a soc ia ción fue posib le porque los re nd im ientos de la yu ca presentaron una respuesta positiva al N sin qu e se modifica ra la situ ació n de co mpetenc ia e ntre la s dos es pec ies , ya qu e el efec to del N so bre el c recimien to a éreo de la yuca só lo se ma nifes tó p le nament e despu és de habe r cosechado e l caupi.La fe rtili zació n con N ta mbi é n tu vo efectos positivos sobre los JET de difere ntes asoc ia cio ne s se gún in formes de Oe lsligle e t al. Un ejemplo acerca del efecto de la s densidades y lo s arreglos espaciales en asociaciones de yuca con caupi, to mado del trabaj o menci onado ant es, demuestra la utilidad del conce pto TC para int erpretar resultados y determinar tanto el grado de competencia entre cultivos como las ve ntaj as o desve ntaj as de distintas prácticas agronómicas en los culti vo s asociados. La yuc a sembrada a una di stan cia constante de 1.80 x 0.60 m se intercaló con caupi a razón de 80,000 pl a nta s/ ha distribuidas en d os surcos , a 0.45 m de distancia de a mb os lad os de la yuca (arreglo 45/2 que presenta la Fig ura 9) . A través de los surcos, el sistema co mpl eto ocupa 1.80 m, de los cua les 0.45 co rresponden a la yuca y los restantes 1.35a l ca upí ; o sea que la s áreas ocup ada s por la yuca y el cau pi respectivamente ti enen una rel ación de I a 3. Los rendimie ntos de la yuca fu eron de 20.9 t/ha de raíces frescas en a sociación y de 22.9 t/ ha e n mo nocu ltivo. y los del ca upi fueron de 1165 y 1653 kg/ha de grano en asociación y en mono¿ultivo , respectivamente. La T C de la yuca se ca lculó co mo sigue: TC yuca = [20 .922.9 y la TC de ca upi fue: El ejemplo mues tra que con el ma nejo agronómico arriba descrilo (arreglo del ca upi en dos surcos d ista ntes ent re sí pe ro relativa mente ce rcano s a la yuca, con una baja densida d de siembra del caupi) la yuca fue el cultivo d o mina nt e en esta asoc iación habiendo resullado cas i cuatro veces más co mpe titiva que el caupi. A pesar de la s condiciones unilate ralm ent e favorabl es para la yuca se logró un JET tota l de 1.63 , el cual ex presa una a lta efi cie ncia del sistema .Co nservando la densida d de población y el a rreglo de la yuca, pero distribu ye nd o el caup i en for ma más pareja y a ument a ndo al mismo ti empo su densidad de sie m bra (arreglo 60/3, 140,000 plantas/ ha ), Jos res ultados fu ero n los siguient es: T C yuca l77 1357 J~ = 0.93 22.9 1623 IIn]! = 108 TC caupi = --1623 22. 9 1En est as co ndiciones, se logró un ba lance ca si completo entre las d os espe cies, siendo e l ca upi ligera mente más competitivo que la yuca. El JET to ta l lograd o en este sistema fue de 1.61 .U n problema que se presen ta al usa r el índice TC es la cont ri bució n del factor di stribuci ón de l á rea (Ey/Ex 1, la cual es pa rticularmente gra nd e en el pri mer ejemplo y responde cas i com pletame nte por la gran di rere ncia que exi ste en tre los T C de la yuca y del ca upi , mi entras que los rendim ient os por sí mis mos co nt ri buyen poco a esta diferencia. Sin embargo , aun cuand o se consi dere sólo la tasa del componente IET (eliminand o el cociente Ey /Ex del cómputo), se o btienen tasa s TC pa ra yuca y ca u pi de 1.30 y 0.77 respecti vamente, most rand o que, (\", \"ualquier caso, la yuca fu e má s compet iti va q ue el caupi bajo las co ndiciones agronóm icas dad as. En el seg und o ejempl o la eliminación de l factOr di stribució n del área no afecta el TC ya que Ey/ Ex tie ne un valor unitario.Analizando la co mpetencia en tre la yuca y el ca upí en el ejemplo por medi o del con ce pto TC , se hace evidente q ue el manejo ag ro- nóm ic o de un sislema aso ciado permile cambiar drá sti ca mente el p oder competitivo de s us compone nt es para dar prefe renc ia a un o u otro , o mantener el bal a nce entre ellos de ac uerd o co n la s prod ucciones deseadas. Esto no a fec la necesa riamente la eficiencia to ta l medida por el IET .El con cepto TC con slitu ye, entonces, un in strument o útil pa ra cuantifica r la capacidad competitiva de los culti vos en asociación y asi ve rifi ca r el efecto que di stinta s prá ct icas de manej o tienen sobre este pará metro.La eva luaci ó n eco nóm ica es una definici ó n de la productividad para difere nt es allern ativas de cu ltivos asociad os, a plica nd o los crite rios empleados por el agricultor. Estos crite ri os depende rán de sus objeti vos, los cu a les, a su vez, so n detenninad os por el destino de la producción : autocon sum o o ve nta . En A méri ca La tin a se produce má s yuca para el merca d o que para autocon sum o, lo q ue permite eva lu a r dife rentes sistema s de culti vos asociados en t érminos de su valor comercial.Al compara r diferentes siste mas de cultivo, es ve ntajoso establecer diferencia s e n la prod uclividad de los mism os en términos del va lo r comercia l tal co mo se encuentra en los prec ios de! me rcad o. Las principales ventaja s son: a) Es pos ibl e com parar los difere ntes productos e insumos de l c ulti vo, aplica nd o una unidad com ún de medida . b) Se pueden tom a r en cuenta diferencias de calidad. c) El in vesti ga do r puede evaluar dife rentes alt e rnativas desde el mism o án gulo que el agri cult o r.La eval ua ción econ ómi ca aS llme, por lo tan to, q ue la elecc ión de a lterna ti vas de siste ma s de CUllivo por parte del agricultor obedece a l obj etivo de ob ten er un ma yo r ingreso líquido , el cu a l es igual a l va lo r de la prod ucció n to ta l del c ulti vo men os s us coStos. La co mparación basada en la renta líquid a es efecti va pa ra ayudar a seleccio nar el más conveniente e ntre difere ntes sistema s de cu lti vo, especialmente en los ca sos sigu ient es : a) Cuan d o ha y competencia entre los cultivos as ociad os; esta co mpetencia se puede mod ifica r med ianle prácticas de manejo en favord e la yuca o del culti vo asociado (v éa se \" Com peten cia e ntre culti vos\"). b) Cu a ndo hay mayo res d iferencias en el nivel de ins um as y por lo tanto en el costo d e la producc ión . el Cua ndo ha y dife ren cias en e l val o r relativo de los cu lti vos de una re gió n y o tra , lo q ue puede modificar la rentabi lida d del si ste ma de prod ucci ón .Por o tra pa rte , el sistema co n la mayor renta neta pu ede ser diferent e del siste ma que a rroj e el má s alt o índice equi va lente de ti erra ( IET) . E II ET difiere de la medi da de la renta líquida principa lment e po rq ue en el cá lcu lo de ese índice cada cu lti vo tie ne ig ual va lo r, y las dife re ncias e n los cos tos de proelucci ó n no se toma n en c ue nta . Por lo ta nto, la d eter min ació n de la p ro ducti vidad bi o lógica debe esta r lógica me nte se parad a ele la definición de renta bil ida d.En favo rde la brevedad , se di sc utirá un aná li si s simpl e de rentabili d ad (ta mb ién conocid o como presup uesto parcia l) d ividi é ndolo e n cuatro etapas princ ipa les: a) es peci fica ció n de sistem as al te rnos: b) cál culo de beneficios brutos; e) de te rmi nac ión de costos de p rod ucció n , y dl cá lcu lo d e la renta o d el benefic io (pa ra una disc usión más co mpleta de estas o perac io nes ve r Pe rrin e t a l. , 1976).El a ná li sis econó mi co e n su forma má s simpl e preten de d eterminar cuál es la al ternativa más rentable. De ac ue rd o con la natu ra leza de los dat os expe rimenta le s. es te a ná lisi s se hace ca si siem pre por unidad de supe rfi cie (hec tárea s). La pri me ra ope ra ción d ebe es pec; . fica r las d ist i nta s a I tern a tivas po ten ci alm e nte util iza bles por el ag ric ult or, incluyendo los difere ntes sislema s d e c ul tivo, y dete rm inand o la s prácti cas culturales que de ntro d e cada si stema produ zca n cambios en los costos d e producció n o en el rendim ie nt o. En el Cuadro 15 se p rese nt a un eje mpl o de es te aná li sis para difere ntes a lternat ivas en el sis tema yuca -frij o l.Enseguida se ca lculan los benefi cios brutos o el ingreso para cada alternativa . La producció n d e cad a c ulti vo dentro de cada sistem a se multiplica por su respectivo precio para obtener el valo r d e la cosecha , y luego los dife re ntes val o res de los cultivo s se sum a n pa ra cal c ular el ingreso bru to total para cada a lterna tiva. El precio es un pará metro c rítico e n estos cá lculos, y debe correspon der a l qu e se pa ga por los product os a la sa lid a de la finca, o sea el precio que el agric ultor recibe por la venta de su co secha. n Cuadro 15. Análisis de ren12bllldad para una hectá rea de terreno con diferentes sistemas de asociaci6n yuca-frijol' . \" , Pr ~~'os 1 valores en f'C'ws colomb lln n~ ~1 cambiO d(. ~Co, 44 l/dólar W La mayor diferencia entre el análisis económico y el análisis biológico está en que el primero deduce det rendimiento monetario bruto los diferentes costos de producción entre los distintos sistemas, mientras que en el segundo sólo se toma en cuenta la producción total. El énfasis está en los insumos o costos que varían entre los tratamientos; por lo tant o , para distinguir entre las diferentes alternativas no se neces ita un presupuest o completo que inclu ya costos fijos tales co mo la tierra y la maquinaria; sólo se hace un presupue sto parcial considerando los costos variables.Los costos que con mayor probabilidad van a cambiar entre diferentes sistemas de cultivo en asociación con yuca son los relacionados con: a) establecimiento del sistema, b) mano de obra, especialmente para desyerbar; e) insumos req ueridos, tales como los fungicidas para una asociación con frijol, o el fertilizante nitrogenado para la asociación con maíz; d) cosecha.En el ejem plo que presenta el Cuadro 15, son notorias las difere ncias en los costos de producción para los sistemas de cultivo, y se deben por un lado al incremento en el uso de insumos con la introducción del frijol y por otro lado al ahorro sustancial en el costo de la mano de obra necesaria para desyerbar, debido al control cultural de malezas establecido por el frijol arbustivo.Los beneficios netOs se calc ulan sustrayendo los cOStOs variables totales de los beneficios brutos.El cuadro se presen tó no solamente para suministrar información con da tos concretos sobre la ren tabilidad de varios si ste mas asociados de yuca con frijol, sino también para proporcion ar al lector un marco de referencia que le permita, con la introducción de cifras propias, analizar una situación de cultivo familiar para él y efectuar el cómputo de la rentabilidad neta. El ejemplo muestra que en las condiciones del CIAT el sistema de cultivo de yuca y frijol en asociación da una ganancia por hectárea má s alta que los sistemas de monocultivo. Se ha demostrado también (Har!, 1975;CIAT, 1978;CIAT 1980) que dentro de una gama de condiciones de producción los sistemas de cultivos asociados con yuca dan una respuesta económica má s favorable que la yu ca en monocultivo:"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2175598894.json b/main/part_2/2175598894.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37a9c1b050bb80c0156d00ecbd653a30788a22bc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2175598894.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ca70f3be3ff37a7f82454f1a78628950","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c07e1db2-de7e-4090-9810-87a99d971cf9/retrieve","id":"-1391944074"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1fa24c99-3f2c-4781-80d7-e0f8a4db57c4","content":"Farroers' pereeptions in 1998. In 1998, fanners' perceptíon8 of the iropact that PPB products would have on local landrace diversity were recorded. Most of the respondents reported that they would increase the area under M-3 or M-9. About 24% ofthe respondents reported that the adoption ofM-3 or M-9 would either reduce the area under landrace Kathe or entírely replace it A similar situation was perceived for landraces Kalopatle (8% of respondents), Maisara (6%), Raksali (3%) and Darmalí (3%). A fllrther 10% ofthe surveyed households al80 mentíoned the possíble partial replacement of I O other landraces and one modern varíety, No households reported that they would entírely replace the landrace Chhornrong Dhan or Ihe modern variety Khumal-4, even though at leas! one household mentioned the complete-replacement of at leasl one ofthe remaining 19 landraces.The 1999 survey confinned mosl of the 1998 perceptions, The area and number of adoplíng households ¡ncreased significantly for M-3 and M-9 (figure 5). The ¡ncreasing adoptíon ofM-3 and M-9 is líkely lo have far greater impact on landrace diversíty in the future than what had already taken place by 1999.In 1999, the area under 12 out of the 19 landraces had decreased, whíle for eight of them, the number of adopting households decreased. Area was more dynamic than the number of households probably because a decision to change the area under a landrace is more common than to entirely drop a landrace or adopt a new one. .. .. Figure 5 Change in area and household adopters from 1996 to 1999 for M-3 and M-9 in seven villages (see table 1)As an example, the changes in adoption of rice cultivars from 1996-1999 were analyzed for the seven villages shown in figure 3. The decrease in area was statistically significant for eight oflhe 10 most common landraces, i,e., Chhomrong Dhan, K.hate, Kalopatle, and Sinjali (p < .001), Raksalí and Rakse (p < ,O 1), and Darmali and Maisare (p :::; .05). In al! cases, this decrease was largely accounted for by a compensating íncreasc in M-3 and M-9. Ofthese six landraces, four ofthem had becn mentioned by farmers for possible replacement in the 1998 survey.Most sígnificantly, tbree ofthe eight landraces where the number of adoptíng households declined were those that were grown by the most households. Hence, it was mainly Ihe most common landraces Ihat had fewer adopters in 1999 than in 1996, and the less common landraces were the most buffered against change, AH of Ihe five landraces with only a single household in 1996 were also grown by a single household in 1999 (figure 6).\"\"\"\"-0. ... :._-lt-........• _.Household numberNote; Cultivars with significant changes in area have been indicated by asterisks (*.* = p .$ .001; ** = P S .01; *' \"' \" P セ @ .05).Nonsignificant changes are indicated with 'n,' elose 10 the 1996 ori¡¡in of!he lineo Tho significance of changes in adopting households was not tested.Figure 6. Change in area and household adopten from 1996 to 1999 for higb altitude rice landraces alter ¡be introduction of M-3 and M-9 in seven villages (see table 1)Varietal change is a common and continuous process in most subsíslence farming where farrners allocate different proportions oftheir land lo a cultivar from one season to anolher. Landraces !hat most c10sely match Ihe new varieties, but have a lower yield or other undesirable traits, are replaced first. The landraces wilh Ihe greatest reduction in area and adopting households were Chhornrong Dhan, Kalhe, and Kalopatle. The niches ofthese varieties closely match Ihose ofM-3 and M-9.By 1999, six years after Ihe commencement of the PPB program, Ihe products of PPB occupied about 11% of Ihe total rice area and about 14% of Ihe surveyed households. There is a continuing trend ofincreasíng adoption ofM-3 and M-9 in both area and household number. In Ihe past, in spite of concerted efforts by government extension agencies lo promote modem rice varieties, Iheir adoption was very poor. For example, only 100/.,-11 % of farming households were growing improved rice cultivars in a survey of 1688 households in 11 districts of eastem and westem Nepal nearly three decades after the intervention of improved varieties (Chemjong e! al. 1995;LARC 1995). Targeting specific niches that were not addressed by conventional breeding programs is one ofthe objectives ofPPB. The increasing acceptance ofPPB products in the study villages provides evidence for its success.To conserve landraces, maintaining diversity at the community leve! should be sufficient. Although there was an oyeran 105s in landrace richness in the sample, it was no! severe and M-3 and M-9 added to the diversity. Landraces found to be mos! al risk can be utilized in particípatory plant breeding programs so tha! their useful genes are incorporated in more productive genotypes and hence conserved. In terms ofutility and food security, diversity at the household level may be more important, and the addition of either or both M-3 and M-9 to the varietal portfolios of about 14% of the farmers would contribute to this diversity.An important finding was tha! the adoption of landraces was highly dynamic, wi!h losses and gains at the village level and cornmon changes in areas. Ex situ conservation is simply a \"snapshot\" of a situation in the year in whích the coHechon was marle. PPB, in producing varieties that farmers Iike, contributes to the dynamism. It accelerates cbange by introducing genes and genotypes but may not fundarnentally cbange the age-old process ofvarietal adoption. Indeed, as argued by Witcomhe et al. (1996), PPB in ils collaborative form in farmers' fields is a dynamic form of in situ genetic conservation."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2195857450.json b/main/part_2/2195857450.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2a82386bc8402c1fa6afbabc03a65ba28265138 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2195857450.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ee5faacfdcad0dcf6af9f955657fa250","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2ace8d2b-b84f-4e9a-8462-14d33a69f83e/retrieve","id":"-80280590"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"059a016f-6e31-4b0c-ba30-18caeb8ca1b5","content":"Fodder shrubs have great potential for increasing the income of smallholder dairy farmers. This paper documents their uptake in central Kenya and the efforts of a range of institutions to promote their adoption. The successful dissemination of new knowledge-intensive practices such as fodder shrubs requires much more than the transfer of knowledge and germplasm; it involves building partnerships with a range of stakeholders, ensuring appropriateness of the practice, assisting local communities to mobilise resources, and ensuring participation of farmers' groups in evaluating the practice. The main challenge of the future is how to make such flows of information and germplasm self-sustaining.Numbers of calliandra trees planted by 45 surveyed farmers who started planting 1992/93 or earlier Table 1 Farmers'expansion of calliandra planting, Embu, Kenya, 1995 Table 2 Planting methods and sources of calliandra planting material, Embu, Kenya, 1995 Table 3 Niches where farmers chose to plant calliandra, Embu, Kenya, 1995 Table 4 Groups establishing fodder shrub nurseries, central highlands of Kenya, 2000 Table 5 Expanding numbers of fodder shrub nurseries, central highlands of Kenya Table A1 Coefficients and prices used in the economic analysis Table A2 Partial budget: Extra costs and benefits of using calliandra as a supplement Table A3 Partial budget: Extra costs and benefits of substituting calliandra for dairy mealThe low quality and quantity of feed resources form the greatest constraint to improving the productivity of livestock in sub-Saharan Africa (Winrock International, 1992). Milk demand and production are concentrated around towns and cities where marketing costs are relatively low. Furthermore, farm sizes are also smaller in these peri-urban areas, exacerbating feed constraints. Fast-growing leguminous trees or shrubs (the terms 'tree' and 'shrub' are used synonymously in this paper) have the potential to alleviate farmers' feed problems. Leguminous trees and shrubs have root nodules that can often fix nitrogen from the atmosphere, making it available to plants.Fodder from these shrubs is rich in protein and, unlike grass species, the shrub leaves maintain their levels of protein even during the dry season. Moreover, farmers can use the shrubs for many other purposes -for hedges along boundaries and around the homestead, for prevention of soil erosion along contours and for fuelwood.Since the early 1990s, the National Agroforestry Research Project (NAFRP), based at the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) Regional Research Centre in Embu, has been actively testing Calliandra calothyrsus and other fodder shrubs around Embu. The project is jointly managed by KARI, the Kenya Forestry Research Institute, and the World Agroforestry Centre. By 1997, about 1000 farmers in the areas surrounding on-farm trial sites had planted calliandra but the project lacked the staff and resources required to extend the planting to other areas of the Kenyan highlands. A second project helped facilitate the scaling up of fodder shrub adoption throughout the central Kenya highlands, financed by the Systemwide Livestock Programme (SLP) of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). The project ran from 1999 to 2001 and involved the World Agroforestry Centre, KARI, and the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).The objective of this paper is to describe the development of fodder shrub technologies by researchers and farmers and the process of disseminating fodder shrubs to farmers throughout central Kenya. The paper highlights the importance of participatory approaches in the development of new fodder shrub practices and the key role of establishing effective partnerships to facilitate the scaling up process.The coffee-based land-use system of central Kenya, ranging in altitude from 1300 m to 1800 m, is located on the slopes of Mt Kenya. Rainfall occurs in two seasons, March-June and October-December, and averages 1200 mm to 1500 mm annually. Soils, primarily Nitosols, are deep and of moderate to high fertility.Population density is high, ranging from 450 to 700 persons/km 2 . In the Embu area, farm size averages one to two hectares. Most farmers have title to their land, and thus their tenure is relatively secure. The main crops are coffee, produced for cash, and maize and beans, produced for food. Most farmers also grow Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) for feeding their dairy cows and they crop their fields constantly because of the shortage of land. About 80% have improved dairy cows, 1.7 cows per family, kept in zero-or minimum-grazing systems. Milk yields average about 8 kg/cow/day and production is for both home consumption and sale (Minae and Nyamai, 1988;Murithi, 1998). Dairy goats, which are particularly suited to poorer households, are a rapidly growing enterprise.The main feed source for dairy cows is Napier grass, supplemented during the dry season with crop residues, such as maize and bean stover, banana leaves and pseudostems, and indigenous fodder shrubs. Commercial dairy meal (composed mainly of maize bran, wheat bran, cotton seed cake, soybean meal and fish meal, and nominally 16% crude protein) is purchased by 45% of farmers to supplement their cows' diet (Murithi, 1998). The farmers complain that the price ratio between dairy meal and milk is unfavourable, that they lack cash to buy the meal, and that it is difficult for them to transport it from the market to their homesteads. Many also suspect its nutritive value, in part because of scandals in Kenya concerning fraudulent maize seed and agrochemicals sold to farmers (Franzel et al., 2002).Research on fodder shrubs by ILRI and KARI began in Kenya in the 1980s. The first on-farm trials in the Embu area were initiated by NAFRP scientists in 1991, testing three promising species: calliandra, Sesbania sesban, and Leucaena leucocephala to find out in which niches farmers preferred to plant the shrubs. Because of the limited size of the farms, farmers and researchers focused on integrating the shrub into the existing cropping system rather than planting the tree in purestand fodder banks. In farmer-designed and -managed trials, their choices included:• Planting the shrubs as hedges around the farm compound. Hedges are a common feature of homesteads in central Kenya, and have traditionally been planted to relatively unproductive, non-browse species, to prevent free-ranging livestock from eliminating them. But livestock are now confined and there is great potential for replacing unproductive hedges with fodder hedges (Thijssen et al., 1993).• Planting along contour bunds and terrace edges on sloping land. They thus help conserve soil and, if kept • Intercropped with Napier grass. Results from intercropping experiments show that introducing calliandra into Napier grass has little effect on the latter's yields (Nyaata et al., 1998).• Between upper storey trees. which are commonly planted along boundaries The growth of fodder trees is hardly affected by taller species, such as Grevillea robusta, planted in the same line (NARP, 1993). Pruning management has also been examined. The shrubs are first pruned for fodder nine to 12 months after planting, and pruning is carried out four or five times per year (Roothaert et al., 1998). Leafy biomass yields per year rise as pruning frequency decreases and cutting height increases but adjacent crop yields are negatively affected (ICRAF, 1992). The most productive compromise is probably in the range of four to six prunings per year at 0.6 to 1 m cutting height, which would yield roughly 1.5 kg dry matter (4.5 kg fresh biomass) per tree per year planted at two trees per metre in hedges under farmers' conditions. Thus a farmer would need about 500 shrubs to feed a cow throughout the year at a rate of 2 kg dry matter per day, providing about 0.6 kg crude protein. This amount would provide an effective protein supplement to the basal feed of Napier grass and crop residues for increased milk production. A typical farm of 1.5 ha could easily accommodate 500 shrubs without replacing any existing crops. For example, the farm would have available about 500 m of perimeter and several hundred metres in each of three other niches: along terrace edges or bunds, along internal field and homestead boundaries, and in Napier grass plots. As shrubs are planted at a spacing of 50 cm, only 250 m would be needed to plant 500 of them (Paterson et al., 1998).Research on feeding calliandra has been funded by the Forestry Research Programme of the Department for International Development (DFID), UK. On-farm feeding trials have confirmed the effectiveness of calliandra as both a supplement to the basal diet and as a substitute for dairy meal. One kg of dry calliandra (24% crude protein and digestibility of 60% when fed fresh) has about the same amount of digestible protein as 1 kg dairy meal (16% crude protein and 80% digestibility) (Paterson et al., 1998); each increases milk production by about 0.75 kg (from 10.0 kg to 10.75 kg per day) under farm conditions, but the response is variable, depending on such factors as the health of the cow and the quantity and quality of the basal feed (Paterson et al., 1998). The effects of calliandra and dairy meal were found to be additive, suggesting that the two feeds are nutritionally interchangeable. Unfortunately, data are not available for constructing a response curve to show the effect of varying quantities of calliandra on milk production. Calliandra was also found to increase the milk production of dairy goats (Kiruiro et al., 1998).Calliandra seedlings are raised in nurseries and transplanted following the onset of the rains. Experiments on seedling production have confirmed that the seedlings may be grown 'bare-root', that is, raised in seedbeds rather than by the more expensive, laborious method of raising them in polythene bags (O'Neill et al., 1997). Researchers are also conducting studies on other shrub species, exotic and indigenous, to help farmers further diversify their feed sources. In the late 1990s, two other species were introduced to farmers: Leucaena trichandra, an exotic, and Morus alba (mulberry), a naturalised species (that is, introduced over 100 years ago). Research continues on indigenous species but none has yet been identified that can be pruned intensively. Desmodium intortum, a herbaceous legume, has also been introduced to farmers with some success. Its chief disadvantage is that its biomass is not available during the dry season, when it is needed most.In the mid-1990s, research confirmed that farmers in the Embu area were adopting calliandra, expanding their plantings, and disseminating the practice to their neighbours (Franzel et al., 1999;Franzel et al., 2002). The first survey took place in 1995 and involved 45 randomly selected farmers from a list of those who had planted calliandra before 1993. About two-thirds had been involved in on-farm trials; the others had received planting materials from a development project or other farmers. The 45 farmers were surveyed again in 1998. Overall, the sample farmers had a somewhat higher income than other farmers in the area, and their farm size was about 20% larger.Assessing adoption among farmers who participated in on-farm trials and special projects is sometimes suspect, as extensive contact and incentives may bias the farmers in favour of the technology being assessed. In this particular case, we feel that such concerns are negligible. None of the farmers received any incentives aside from free seed and seedlings. All received some advice about calliandra but, as the findings show, lack of information about calliandra was an important problem (one farmer somehow did not know that his calliandra leaves could be fed to livestock!). Monitoring and contact with research and extension varied; about half of the farmers had completed their trials by 1993 and afterwards had little or no contact with researchers.Farmers' first plantings of calliandra averaged 90 trees, of which 84 survived. The high survival rate, 93% (sd=13%), was consistent with data collected in farmermanaged trials in the same area and included some of the same farmers (NARP, 1993). Four-fifths of the farmers used potted seedlings to establish their first calliandra plantings, 16% established their own nurseries, and 4% direct seeded. First plantings occurred between 1988 and 1993 with over half taking place in 1992 (Figure 1). At the time of the first survey, most of the farmers had less than three years of experience planting calliandra. Over four-fifths of the farmers expanded their calliandra plantings after their first planting (Table 1). Over one-third expanded twice, and 18% three or four times. As farmers expanded, the number of trees planted 1 per expansion increased, although because of the high variability, the differences were not statistically significant. In farmers' fourth and fifth plantings, the average number of trees planted was 54% higher than in their first plantings.By 1995, the average number of trees per farmer had increased from 84 (s.d.=65) in their first planting to 218 (s.d.=225; median=166), an increase of over 2.5 times. The rate of increase slowed somewhat over the next three years; by 1998 farmers averaged 311 trees (Ondieki, 1999). The total number of trees planted by sample farmers increased from about 4000 in 1992 to over 14,000 in 1998 (Figure 1).There were important differences in the method of planting and source of planting material between farmers' successive plantings (Table 2). Whereas the principal method in the first and second plantings was to use potted seedlings obtained from projects, the most important method in the third and subsequent plantings was to establish a nursery. Similarly, farmers' own trees and other sources (e.g., friends and relatives) replaced projects as the principal source of planting material beginning in the third planting. Of the 65 incidents of expansion, 33 involved planting seeds or seedlings obtained from projects, and 32, seeds or seedlings obtained from one's own farm or from other persons. By mid-1995, 36% of the farmers had established calliandra nurseries. Three-quarters of these used seed from their own trees.The niches where farmers planted calliandra were sometimes determined by themselves and sometimes by researchers and farmers, as when an on-farm trial concerned a particular niche. Overall, the most common niches were in lines on contours, intercropped with food crops or coffee, and on homestead boundaries. When farmers chose the niches for planting, their most common choices were homestead boundaries, external boundaries, and in lines on contours (Table 3). Only two farmers planted calliandra in pure-stand fodder banks, reflecting their reluctance to allocate even small plots to calliandra.There did not appear to be much association between uptake of calliandra and selected farm and household characteristics, but the assessment was constrained by the small size of the sample. Defining an adopter as a farmer who had expanded at least once and had more than 100 trees, 73% of the sample could be termed adopters. No association was found between adoption and farm size, wealth, size of farm adjacent to the homestead, or number of cows. There was a tendency for adoption to be associated with age; six of seven farmers under 30 adopted whereas only nine of 15 over 55 did so. The dairy enterprise's rank in importance among other enterprises was significantly associated with adoption at the p<0.10 level (Chi square test); the higher the rank of dairy, the more likely farmers were to adopt.Pruning methods were quite variable. The most common method was to cut periodically when the calliandra reached a height of about 1.0 to 1.4 m (before it becomes too difficult to reach and shades neighbouring crops too much), reducing the height to about 0.5 to 1 m. About 80% used pruning shears, which they owned already for use on their coffee and tea. A machete was used by 13%, who claimed that the stem was too thick to use shears. Primarily in order to save time 9% broke branches off by hand. Pruning shears are recommended because they make a cleaner cut, thus promoting regrowth and preventing disease and damage to the tree. * Percentages do not sum to 100 because farmers often plant in more than one niche. In some of the on-farm trials, farmers were asked to plant in a particular nicheFarmers fed calliandra to a wide range of animals, 91% to dairy cows, 47% to goats, and 42% to heifers. Between 5% and 20% fed to each of the following: bulls, sheep, rabbits, calves and poultry, while 69% fed dry cows as well as lactating ones. This was often because they fed from the same trough and it was impractical to separate their rations. Nearly all farmers chopped calliandra before feeding, as recommended, as opposed to giving the branches to the cows to strip off the leaves. Over 90% mixed calliandra with Napier grass when feeding, about 44% also fed calliandra separately at times. Like dairy meal, calliandra is often fed during milking to help keep the cow still.Only one farmer claimed to have fed calliandra to his cows throughout the year. On average, farmers fed it to their cows about one-third of the time, because the quantities they had were not sufficient for the whole year and shrub growth slows during the dry season. Only 12% reduced cutting during the wet season in order to have increased supplies during the dry season because failing to cut calliandra would increase its competition with crops. Three-quarters of the farmers fed their animals within an hour of cutting, in line with the recommendation to feed only fresh leaves (Roothaert et al., 1998). This recommendation has since been changed; recent research shows that calliandra can be fed either fresh or dried (Tuwei, in press).Dairy meal was fed to their cows by 84% of farmers, though many said that, because of cash shortages, they did not feed continuously. Most (62%) used calliandra as a supplement to dairy meal, that is, they did not reduce their use of dairy meal when they fed calliandra. On the other hand, 27% used calliandra as a complete substitute for dairy meal and 10% as a partial substitute. Calliandra was claimed to increase milk production by 88% with 89% claiming their cows found it highly palatable.Some farmers said they obtained other benefits from calliandra than increased milk production. In response to an open question, 24% said that fuelwood production was a benefit, 13% cited soil conservation, and 7% each cited calliandra's beautiful appearance, money saved by not having to buy dairy meal, and a creamier milk texture (researchers have found that calliandra increases the butterfat content of milk). The only negative aspects cited were scales (18%), a pest that is more common during the dry season, and that calliandra reduces the yield of adjacent crops (7%).The farmers varied considerably in the way they used the seed produced by their trees. Seed was harvested by 40%; those that did not do this cited a lack of interest or knowledge about propagation techniques. One-third of the farmers gave seed to others; each gave to an average of 13 other farmers (this figure is skewed upwards because two farmers gave seeds to 110 farmers -the median number of persons given seed was four). Two farmers sold seed or seedlings to other farmers. Two-thirds had left some trees to seed at the time they were interviewed, indicating their strong interest in expanding calliandra production or in distributing seed.The NAFRP helped farmers' groups in the Embu area set up 14 calliandra nurseries in 1997, 26 in 1998, and 12 in 1999. But extension work was outside the project mandate; therefore, the new project financed by SLP recruited a dissemination specialist in 1999 to scale up the use of fodder shrubs in central Kenya (ILRI, 2000). The scaling-up task was not exclusively to transfer knowledge of fodder shrub technologies and seed to new areas but, equally important and more timeconsuming, (1) to build partnerships with a range of stakeholders in new areas, (2) to assess whether feed shortage was a felt problem among farmers, and consequently gauge their interest in planting fodder shrubs and determine whether the shrubs were appropriate to their environment, (3) to assist farmers' groups and communities to effectively mobilise local and external resources for establishing calliandra nurseries, and (4) to ensure the effective participation of farmers' groups and stakeholders in testing, disseminating, monitoring and evaluating the practice. These tasks were considered vital to ensuring that scaling up would be sustainable once the project was implemented (Wambugu et al., 2001). Initially, project staff reviewed secondary information and results of farmer surveys to assess appropriate areas for fodder shrubs. Potential collaborating organisations across seven districts (a district comprises roughly 2000 to 4000 km 2 and 200,000 to 500,000 people) were identified, including government departments, NGOs, churches, and community-based organisations. Fortunately, most were already using participatory research and development methods and confirmed that farmers they worked with had critical problems feeding their dairy cows and were interested in planting fodder shrubs. Farmers in a few areas, such as those focusing on irrigated vegetable production, were not interested in planting fodder trees.Project activities extended across seven districts but were focused in clusters within each district to reduce costs and to facilitate monitoring and the exchange of information among groups. The project dissemination specialist identified interested farmers' groups through Ministry of Agriculture extension agents and other collaborators. Most of the groups were already in existence before the project, promoting such activities as keeping dairy goats, handicrafts, domestic water tanks, soil conservation, organic farming or shrub nurseries. Most (76%) of the groups included both men and women; 15% were women's groups and 9% were men's groups (Table 4). Group size ranged from four Meetings were held with the groups to discuss the problems they had in feeding their cows and to explain the costs, benefits and risks of planting fodder shrubs. Farmer visits were arranged to see farmers in the Embu area who had already had several years of experience in growing and feeding calliandra to their dairy cows and goats. Most of the farmers' groups paid for their own transportation and subsistence costs on these visits, collecting funds from members and hiring local buses or using public transportation. Seeing and discussing calliandra with experienced farmers was an effective means to promote calliandra planting and to provide a forum for farmers to learn about its growth, management and use. The tours involved 420 farmers from 25 groups and 20 extension staff.For areas where farmers were interested in fodder trees, project staff and partners discussed the terms of collaboration and each party's role was made explicit: SLP staff would initially provide the training and seed but after two to three years the partner organisation would take over these functions. Joint work plans were then developed, which clearly indicated a schedule of training events and follow-up activities. Needs assessments were undertaken to determine farmers' knowledge and skills and to ensure that training would build on farmers' indigenous knowledge. Once farmers were trained to establish nurseries, they, in turn, trained their neighbours.Between 1999 and 2000, the project dissemination specialist assisted staff of the following organisations to help farmers establish nurseries: the provincial administration in two provinces, three departments of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, one international NGO, four local NGOs, the extension service of a private company, two church extension services, 10 community-based organisations and 150 farmers' groups. Staff also helped schools and churches establish 10 nurseries on their compounds to serve as demonstrations.Nurseries had to be located close to a permanent water source; this condition limited the number of nurseries and the spread of the practice. Group members divided the labour among themselves and shared the seedlings produced. Most groups preferred to grow their seedlings using the 'bare-root' method rather than in polythene bags. The former have lower survival rates but are much less expensive to produce, as bags are expensive and filling them with soil is laborious. So long as farmers had access to water, they were able to establish nurseries successfully. They also needed some training, especially with establishing the nurseries and with harvesting. (In the following year, most of the training was provided by the previous year's trainees.) In a survey of 75 group nurseries during the first year of project activities, 1999, 58 (77%) were rated as 'good' or 'fair', indicating the groups' ability to produce high-quality seedlings.By the end of 2000, the 150 groups had developed 250 nurseries involving over 2600 farmers (Table 5). On average, farmers each transplanted about 245 calliandra seedlings, of which about 156 (64%) survived. Drought was the main cause of the high mortality. Rainfall was less than normal for three consecutive seasons: the short rains of 1999 and the long and short rains of 2000.Selected group members were trained in how to produce and distribute seeds. Calliandra begins producing seed in its second year but unfortunately they produce relatively little and collecting it is laborious. Some farmers and private nurseries have begun selling calliandra seed and seedlings, and the numbers doing so are likely to increase as production and demand for the shrubs increases.The SLP project also started disseminating other fodder legumes; farmers in 80 groups have planted L. trichandra, 70 groups have planted mulberry, and 13 groups have planted Desmodium intortum. Farmers value diversification because it reduces the risk of pest and disease attack and improves feed quality. In addition, the project's dissemination approach has been adopted by other partners, who are disseminating improved mangoes, climbing beans, and new maize and potato varieties to the same farmers' groups.Informal monitoring takes place in which farmers and extension staff provide feedback to researchers on their progress and problems. In one case, feedback on a farmer innovation has resulted in a change in extension recommendations. Farmers in Kandara Division, Maragua District, conducted experiments on soaking calliandra seeds before planting and found that seeds soaked for 48 to 60 hours had higher germination rates than those soaked for the recommended 24 hours. Researchers at KARI-Embu confirmed the farmers' findings and extension staff now recommend the longer soaking time.Severe drought and poor distribution of rainfall during 1999 and 2000 increased the mortality of seedlings in the nurseries and shrubs in the field. Lack of seed was also a critical constraint limiting expansion, especially in areas where fodder shrubs are not found. Infestation by crickets, hoppers and aphids has also led to a significant loss of seedlings. These pests are particularly damaging during dry periods. The high turnover among staff of the Ministry of Agriculture, poor morale, and the lack of resources such as transportation have also limited success. The SLP project occasionally assisted ministry staff with transportation and subsistence allowances, which greatly increased The adoption and dissemination of fodder shrubs in central Kenya staff motivation. Finally, the poor performance of the milk market in many areas has had a negative influence on adoption. Following the collapse of the main milk marketing system in Kenya in the late 1990s, the private sector has been slow to fill the gap and many farmers currently have problems marketing their milk.In 2001, farmers in central Kenya who planted about 500 calliandra shrubs earned an additional $US98-124 per year from their dairy enterprises, beginning in the second year after planting (Appendix 1). The benefits were the result of either using fodder shrubs to increase their milk production or in savings from reducing their purchases of dairy meal. The average household has about 1.7 cows per farm, thus the potential increase in earnings per household is around US$189, an increase of approximately 10% in household income.Fodder trees appear to be appropriate for smallholder dairy farmers throughout the highlands of eastern Africa -calliandra, for example, can grow at altitudes between sea level and 1900 m, requires only 1000 mm rainfall, can withstand dry seasons up to four months long, and is suitable for cut-and-carry feeding systems or for grazing systems (Roothaert et al., 1998). It is also suitable for dairy goat production, which is growing rapidly in Kenya. The potential impact of fodder trees thus appears to be very large. If all 625,000 smallholder dairy farmers were to adopt calliandra or similar fodder shrub species, the benefits would amount to about US$118 million per year.Fodder trees also have important potential in the large-scale dairy sector, which supplies 30% of Kenya's milk. Moreover, fodder trees are being planted by dairy farmers at numerous other sites in east and southern Africa. Over 500 farmers in Uganda, Tanzania and Zimbabwe have adopted fodder trees. They are also being planted in Rwanda, Ethiopia, Malawi and Zambia. Results are promising.Several factors have contributed to the achievements thus far:• The demand among farmers for fodder shrubs was high, mainly because the shrubs save cash, the farmers' scarcest resource, and require only small amounts of land and labour, which can be sourced from within the household.• The project area is noted for the dynamism of its farmers, and access to markets is relatively easy, enhancing the adoption of new practices.• Participatory methods were used in designing the fodder shrub technology. Initial on-farm trials were farmer-designed and -managed, permitting farmers to plant the trees in niches of their choice and to manage them as they saw fit.• Because the projects promoting fodder trees worked through partner organisations instead of directly with far mers, they were able to build on local organisational skills and knowledge and reach far more farmers than would otherwise have been possible.• Dissemination through farmers' groups instead of individual farmers economises on scarce training skills and resources. In addition, working with groups ensures greater farmer-to-farmer dissemination and exchange of information.-The strong partnership between researchers, extensionists and farmers facilitated the flow of information among the three. -promoting private-sector seed production and marketing -facilitating private institutions, such as dairy marketing firms and agricultural stockists to promote fodder shrubs -deter mining the role of farmer-to-far mer dissemination in spreading the practice and assessing ways that we can promote it -assisting farmers' groups to mobilie their own resources and obtain information on improved practices from sources outside their villages Partial budgets were drawn up to show the effects of using fodder shrubs on farmers' net income under two scenarios: using calliandra (1) as a supplement to the normal diet and (2) as a substitute for purchased dairy meal. The base analysis assumes a farm with 500 trees and one zero-grazed dairy cow, and covers a five-year period. The benefits included in the analysis are the effect of calliandra on milk production (in the supplementation case) and the cash saved by not purchasing dairy meal and interest on cash freed up (in the substitution case). Costs are those of the seedlings and labour for planting, cutting and feeding calliandra in 2001. Coefficients, prices, and sources of data used in the economic analysis are shown in Table A1. Partial budgets for calliandra as a supplement to farmers' basal feed and as a substitute for dairy meal are shown in Tables A2 and A3. Tree establishment costs (including the costs of seedlings and planting) are modest, US$2.31/500 trees. Beginning in the second year, harvesting and feeding 2 kg dry calliandra per day as a supplement throughout the lactation period increases milk production by about 450 kg/yr, an increase of about 10% over base milk yields. Incremental benefits per year after the first year are Table A1 Coefficients and prices used in the economic analysis over 12 times higher than incremental costs. The net present value (NPV) assuming a 20% discount rate is US$206.50. Net benefits per year after the first year are $96.01.In the partial budget assessing calliandra as a substitute for dairy meal, establishment, cutting and feeding costs are the same as in the preceding analysis. By feeding calliandra, the farmer saves the money he would have spent buying and transporting 730 kg dairy meal during the year. Incremental benefits per year after the first year are over 14 times higher than incremental costs. Milk production does not increase but net benefits are slightly higher than in the supplementation case. The NPV assuming a 20% discount rate is $262.27. The net benefits per cow per year after year 1 are $123.73. Therefore, using calliandra increases farmers' annual income by about $96 to $124 per cow per year after the first year, depending on whether the farmer is supplementing or substituting. As the average farmer owns 1.7 cows, calliandra has the potential to increase a farmer's income by around $163 to $211 per year, representing an increase of about 10% in total household income (Murithi, 1998).The partial budget was also calculated for the years 1996-8 and net benefits after year 1 ranged from $94 APPENDIX 1 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF FODDER SHRUB PRODUCTION to $151, depending on the year and whether the farmer was assumed to be supplementing or substituting (Franzel et al., 2002).The analyses confirm that the costs of establishing, maintaining, and feeding calliandra are low. In both the substitute and supplement scenarios, farmers recover their costs very quickly, in the second year after planting. In order to break even, a farmer using calliandra as a supplement needs to obtain only 0.08 kg of milk from 1.0 kg of calliandra (dry), rather than the 0.75 kg milk per kg (dry) of calliandra obtained in on-farm trials and assumed in the analysis.Several intangible or otherwise difficult to measure benefits and costs have been omitted from this analysis. Calliandra provides benefits to some farmers as firewood, in erosion control, as a boundary marker, a fence and as an ornamental. It also increases the butterfat content of milk, giving it a richer taste and creamier texture. When used as a supplement, calliandra may improve animal health and fertility and reduce the calving interval. Finally, several farmers noted that calliandra had important benefits relative to dairy meal: it was available on the farm, cash was not needed to obtain it, and its nutritional content was more reliable than that of dairy meal. These views support the thesis that farmers prefer enterprises and practices that do not rely on uncertain governmental or market mechanisms (Haugerud, 1984).The main costs not assessed are the opportunity cost of the land occupied by the trees and the effect of reducing yields of adjacent crops. However, these are likely to be relatively low, especially when calliandra replaces or is added to an existing hedge or bund, is pruned frequently, or when calliandra hedges border on homesteads, roads, paths or external boundaries.Sensitivity analysis was conducted on the 1996-8 results to determine how changes in key parameters would affect the results (Franzel et al., 2002). A 30% reduction in the milk price would reduce the NPV by 33%. However, using calliandra would still be profitable. In the substitute scenario, changing the milk price would not affect the profitability of calliandra relative to dairy meal. A change in the price of dairy meal does not affect the use of calliandra as a supplement. However, in the substitution scenario, a 30% increase in dairy meal price raises the NPV by 32%. A reduction of price by 30% reduces the NPV by 32%. A higher discount rate, 30% instead of 20%, would reduce the NPVs of calliandra in both scenarios by 23%. A 30% increase in labour costs, however, would have little effect, reducing NPVs by less than 5%. If one assumes that 1 kg dairy meal or 1 kg dry calliandra gives 0.5 kg milk instead of 0.75 kg milk, the NPV in the supplement scenario decreases by 37%. Overall, the sensitivity analysis suggests that the net benefits of using calliandra as a supplement or as a substitute are very stable. Despite the range of negative situations tested, net present values and net benefits remain positive. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2204722037.json b/main/part_2/2204722037.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7211fbd2dafc0801cab232bea23e7ffaa7441d75 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2204722037.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d75933d0e3df33743718dda1b914fd48","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/cb90a5df-3268-4ff8-9407-c152bedebbd6/retrieve","id":"-1858897231"},"keywords":["Plant genetic resources","Multilateral System","interdependence","climate change"],"sieverID":"be5ec265-ca27-4267-bcf4-3b8d8f94239f","content":"One of the main considerations underlying the establishment of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and its Multilateral System of Access and Benefit Sharing is the recognition of countries' high interdependence on the genetic resources of the crops and forages which they depend upon for their food security. A continued appreciation of how countries have benefited from facilitated exchange of germplasm in the past and are likely to continue doing so in the future is needed, in order to move forward the implementation of the Multilateral System and creating a truly global pool of genetic resources for countries' agricultural development and adaptation to climate change. Using Costa Rica as a case and rice and bean as key crops, the paper presents a picture of the dynamics of their genetic resources, both inside and outside of the country, over past years and into the future. It illustrates the extent to which Costa Rica is dependent upon germplasm from other countries for its food security, and how, in a complementary manner, other countries rely upon germplasm from Costa Rica. It is hoped that the information presented here may encourage and facilitate the implementation of the International Treaty and its Multilateral System in the country.Francisco Estrada Garro, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, (CATIE), 7170 Cartago, Turrialba 30501, Costa Rica. Email: festrada@catie.ac.cr Gea Galluzzi, Bioversity International, Office for the Americas, km 17 Recta Cali Palmira, Cali, Colombia. Email: geagalluzzi@gmail.com Flor Yvette Elizondo Porras, Ministerio de Agricultura de Costa Rica, Sabana Sur, Antiguo Edificio La Salle, San José Costa Rica. Email: fielizondo@gmail.comFrom the origins of agriculture until around the 1980s, genetic resources (including those for food and agriculture) were largely considered to be a common heritage of mankind, and as such no limitations or formal rules were imposed on their exchange and use, regardless of how far from their area of origin these events took place. However, the increasing application of intellectual property rights, even in the biological arena, gradually led to an international scenario in which diversity-rich countries, mostly in the developing world, felt 'robbed' of the benefits deriving from the commercial exploitation of resources from their territory, and thus began demanding the abolition of the principle of free access to genetic resources. After years of negotiations, their demand was recognized in 1992 in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), which establishes the sovereignty of countries over the natural and genetic resources found within their borders, defining the conditions and procedures required to obtain access to these (i.e. access and benefit-sharing rules).In 1993, the Conference of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) requested the Commission on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (established in the early 1980s) to host intergovernmental negotiations for addressing issues that were not covered by the CBD, or that did not fit into the framework established by the CBD. Among these issues was the status of ex situ collections, the identification of a univocal origin/provider for crop genetic resources (which, in contrast to natural species, tend to be the result of generations of selection by farming communities in different environments), and farmers' rights. After seven years, these negotiations led to the development of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA). The ITPGRFA establishes a multilateral system of access and benefit sharing (from here on, the MLS), through which countries create an international pool of PGRFA for sixty-four priority crops and forages of global importance, to be used for research, training and breeding purposes. In exchange for putting their own PGRFA in the pool, countries obtain access to PGRFA of all other countries, along with those in the collections held by international organizations that have signed agreements with the Governing Body of the ITPGRFA. The ITPGRFA sets out mandatory benefit-sharing requirements: when recipients commercialize new PGRFA products that incorporate material from the MLS, and don't allow others to use those products for research and breeding, they must pay 1.1% of gross sales to an international benefit-sharing fund created under the framework of the ITPGRFA. This fund is used to support research and capacity building in developing countries, in projects selected through a competitive bidding scheme.The fact that countries are highly interdependent on the genetic resources of food security crops and forages was the main reason for creating the multilateral system. An appreciation of the extent to which any party to the ITPGRFA depends on resources from other countries for its agricultural development is an important element to fully understand why participation in the multilateral system is so relevant. The data presented in this working paper should contribute to increasing awareness among stakeholders about the extent to which Costa Rica is dependent upon germplasm from other countries for its food security, and how, in a complementary manner, other countries rely upon germplasm from Costa Rica. Using rice and bean as exemplary crops (one introduced and one native), the analyses include a retrospective element, tracing back their history of domestication or introduction in Costa Rica and their subsequent adoption/diffusion; a present-day snapshot of important achievements based on international PGRFA exchanges; and an investigation of future potential germplasm needs that are required to respond to the likely impacts of climate change on the country's production of these species. The paper begins with a general overview of Costa Rica's agricultural system. Thereafter, in-depth analyses present a picture of the dynamics of rice and bean genetic resources, both inside and outside of the country, over past years and into the future.The research presented here was supported by the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative (GRPI2), a multi-country project aimed at strengthening capacities for the implementation of the ITPGRFA and its multilateral system in eight countries. Bioversity International provided international coordination and research support for the project. In Costa Rica, the project was led by the Comisión Nacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos (CONAREFI), with the participation of the Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE), and the Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería. 1 The data presented here was collected as part of the project component 'Mapping and measuring germplasm interdependence and flows: research on the dynamics of the global crop commons'.Costa Rica is a stable long-standing democracy and middle-income country, which has developed far faster than its neighbours in Central America, and in which agriculture contributes to around 8% of the GDP. The crops grown are white maize, rice, beans, tomatoes, potatoes, cassava and onions; together with Panama, Costa Rica has a relatively high degree of dependence on non-native crops compared to other Central American countries, due to a more consistent dietary shift towards rice, wheat, soybean, and plantain (Flores Palacios 1998).In contrast to its steadily improving environmental and biodiversity management, and high levels of public spending on health and education, one-fifth of its population remain poor; this is particularly true in rural areas, where policy support to smallholder farmers, who produce almost 90% of the country's staples, has been steadily declining. From the 1980s up until 2008, national policies geared towards liberalization and privatization favoured exportoriented production models centred on introduced cash crops such as banana, pineapple and coffee; this trend greatly weakened the role of public agricultural research and extension services, which were traditionally dedicated to maintaining and improving the production of the country's basic food crops (The New Agriculturalist 2015). As a result, as of the mid 2000s, only 20% of white maize and 23% of common beans consumed in Costa Rica were produced nationally (yellow maize was entirely imported), and international collaborations and germplasm exchanges that had contributed to the improvement of these and other basic crops in the country were greatly reduced. Following the price crisis of 2007-2008, it became evident that the country's increasing dependence on imports had a negative effect on its food security, encouraging the government and external agencies such as FAO to launch initiatives (many of them of a regional nature) to boost the domestic production of basic grains (FAO 2013). These initiatives fostered a renewed involvement of national research and development institutions in research and extension, and contributed to strengthening partnerships and participatory approaches around genetic resources, from breeding and variety selection to seed production and dissemination.Cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) is grown worldwide and is one of the most important cereals for human nutrition; it was domesticated thousands of years ago in Asia, from Oryza rufipogon, a wild relative that is still found today. In-depth genetic analyses have revealed that the japonica subspecies of rice was first domesticated from a specific population of O. rufipogon around the middle area of the Pearl River in southern China, and that the indica subspecies was subsequently developed from crosses between japonica and local wild rice as the initial cultivars spread into southern and south-eastern Asia (Huang et al. 2012). Africa is home to a different species of domesticated rice, Oryza glaberrima, whose distribution and use remained restricted mostly to West African countries. Rice seeds of the japonica variety were introduced into Central and South America by European traders (mostly Spanish) during the sixteenth and up until the eighteenth centuries. The exact routes of its introduction are not clear but ports in Panama or Mexico where European ships arrived with goods from the East were most likely important entry points. Further exchanges of material occurred among countries in Central, South, and North America (Lu and Chang 1980). There have also been findings of the African cultigen in Central America, most likely as a result of introduction during the time of the transatlantic slave trade (Bertin et al. 1971). The earliest reports of rice cultivation in Costa Rica are from Matina, a hilly area close to the Atlantic coast (in 1737), and Esparza, on the Pacific side of the country (in 1788). While early rice cultivation was restricted to the highlands where it was managed under slash and burn practices, around the 1960s it was introduced to the lowlands together with 'green revolution' techniques that made flooded cultivation possible (Cabezas Bolaños and Espinoza Esquivel 2000).Today, rice and beans are the main ingredients of the nation's flagship dish, 'el Gallo pinto', in which they are cooked together (black-seeded beans are used). Over the past 40 years, domestic rice consumption has grown (FAOSTAT), reaching a present-day average per capita consumption of around 52 kg per year (corresponding to roughly 22% of the calories ingested), among the highest in the region together with Panama. The policy decision made around 2007 to reverse or attenuate the trend towards export-based cash crop production and invest more in domestic production of basic grains can be detected in the recent rice production trends in Costa Rica; however, the country still needs to import consistent shares of the rice consumed by the population (see figure 1). Today, two separate genepools of domesticated common bean exist: one in Mesoamerica (distributed from Mexico through Central America and into Venezuela and Colombia); and one in the Andes (from southern Ecuador to northern Argentina). Their differences have been studied at morphological (Delgado Salinas et al. 1988;Singh et al. 1991), biochemical (Gepts et al. 1986;Koenig and Gepts 1989), and molecular (Velasquez and Gepts 1994;Papa and Gepts 2003;Kwak and Gepts 2009) levels, leading to the prevalent hypothesis of two independent domestication events, one in each hemisphere. However, the possibility of a single domestication event in Mesoamerica recently regained support (Bitocchi et al. 2012), based on molecular marker analyses of wild populations. Singh et al. (Singh et al. 1991) classified the Mesoamerican cultivars into three raceslowland race Mesoamerica and highland races Durango and Jalisco. The Mesoamerican race, represented by the black, navy and small-red market classes, occupy the lowlands of Latin America from Mexico to northern Colombia and Venezuela.Soon after their domestication, thanks to trade and seed exchanges among indigenous populations, Mesoamerican beans rapidly spread into Central and South America. Four domesticated species grow in Costa Rica (P. vulgaris, P. lunatus, P. coccineus, P. dumosus), and over the past 20 years, 22 wild bean populations have been identified in the country (Debouck et al. 1989;Araya et al. 2001;González et al. 2004). In some areas, such as the Cartago province, wild Phaseolus species grow alongside commercial plantations of domesticated P. vulgaris; notwithstanding the predominantly inbreeding nature of the species, evidence of geneflow has been found (González et al. 2004).Beans are used in a variety of preparations and have traditionally constituted an important source of protein. National annual consumption of beans was recently estimated to be around 40,000 tonnes (Consejo Nacional de Producción 2015), providing between 10% and 15% of the recommended protein intake per person per day, with higher shares among women (Rodríguez-Castillo and Ferbández-Rojas 2003). However, the latest national food consumption survey of 2001 reported a decline in bean consumption, particularly in urban areas, compared to the previous decade (from 53 to 46 g/person/day) (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos 2001). Socio-economic changes and the provision of policy support to cash crops for export markets have affected domestic production and consumption of this native crop: before 1994, there were approximately 21,500 national producers, but by 2004, this number had already gone down to 7,000 with a consequent increase in imports, particularly from Honduras and Nicaragua (red beans), and China (both red and black varieties)(Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería 2008). Costa Rican rice and bean research institutions have long been collaborating with national and international organizations outside the country in joint research efforts that have involved germplasm exchanges. This is reflected both in the presence of rice and bean germplasm of Costa Rican origin in international genebanks, and in the diversity of materials from foreign countries that have been introduced into the country through these genebanks. Crop-based regional networks have also been instrumental in advancing Costa Rica's crop-based research and development agenda, among others by allowing far-reaching exchanges of germplasm that have contributed to the generation of new, successful varieties. Some details on these mechanisms, for rice and beans, are given in the following sections. and United States (G5694) parents on the other; the Brunca variety is the result of a cross between a landrace from Mexico (G4495) and a landrace from Guatemala (G5711); Huetar incorporates a Mexican landrace (G4837) crossed with an improved variety; Corobici comes from a Colombian (G4525) and a Mexican (G4495) parent; and Guaymi derives from a cross between a Guatemalan landrace (G20986) and an improved line developed in CIAT (XAN 176) (Genesys 2014). The varieties developed through the CRSP are mostly based on (repeated) crosses among improved lines or previously released varieties, and the identification of the original genetic resources involved was not possible. Although country of origin information is thus unavailable, an analysis of the genealogy of one of the latest and most successful varieties still on the market, Cabecar, highlights the importance of international collaboration for national advances in bean improvement: the variety was originally developed in Zamorano and released in Honduras under the name of Amadeus 77 (in 1995). It is based on a cross between Tío Canela 75 x DICTA 105. Tío Canela 75 was obtained through another Zamorano-led cross (which also originated from a variety released in Honduras), whereas DICTA 105 derives from APN 102 x APN 83, a cross that was obtained in CIAT and further developed by DICTA Honduras. Thanks to PITTA-Frijol, Amadeus 77 was evaluated and adapted to Costa Rican conditions between 1999 and 2003, both at experimental stations and in farmers' fields, and then released as Cabecar in 2006 (Rosas et al. 2004). Cabecar is used today in almost 90% of the bean-growing areas of Costa Rica. It is a small, red-grained variety, with good yields (over two tonnes/hectare) and adaptation to a broad range of environmental conditions and soils, including those with low fertility; it also carries resistance to many diseases, such as golden yellow mosaic virus, anthracnose and web blight (Hernández and Elizondo 2006).The importance of continued exchanges of germplasm for research is clear when we consider the likely impact of climate change on rice and bean production in Costa Rica. Suitable areas for rice cultivation in Costa Rica are those with temperatures between 20 and 33 degrees, and evenly distributed precipitation of around ten mm/day (Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería); beans grow best in areas with an annual mean temperature below 26 degrees, and annual precipitation between four and ten mm/day (Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería). Since 1995, the Costa Rican National Meteorological Institute has been looking into the expected impacts of a changing climate on rice in the Guanacaste province, and on beans in the Alajuela area. These studies confirm that the decrease in rainfall and the increases in temperature are likely to negatively affect the productivity of both crops, as well as shifting their cropping seasons and/or determining an aggravation of biotic stresses. According to a study by the Comisión Económica para América Latina (CEPAL), Costa Rica would be the Figure 7. Analogue sites for beans, using the bean-growing locality Perez Zeledón as a reference (11°01'59\"N, 84°42'51\"O). Only sites with a similarity greater than 60% were retained. Redder areas denote greater similarity (i.e. have a lower probability of being dissimilar).The 'future climate' areas identified are not necessarily traditional rice-or bean-growing areas.However, if sites can be found in these areas where beans and rice are thriving, obtaining rice or bean germplasm from those sites may be a strategy for introducing materials with adaptive potential into Costa Rican breeding programmes. By overlaying geo-referenced observation data related to rice and common bean accessions deposited in international collections (purple dots on the maps below), it was possible to locate materials that were originally collected in 'future climate' areas. Since these accessions are included in the multilateral system, they are available under a facilitated access regime that makes them easy to obtain by interested Costa Rican breeders. Figures 8 and 9 give some examples of the rice and bean accessions that were collected from these analogue sites, and which are available through the MLS. While some of the 'future climate' areas detected here appear to have been covered by collection missions, resulting in a significant amount of materials deposited in international genebanks and hence in the MLS, few rice and bean samples have been collected from other analogue sites. Bean accessions from Africa and Asia are much fewer than from Latin America, while rice accessions are fewer in Latin America compared to other continents;inter-continent sampling also differs across analogue sites. This is to a large extent to be expected, since collection missions focus on regions of origin and/or diversification of the crops of interest, where diversity is expected to be highest; furthermore, the two crops are not necessarily part of the agricultural systems of all of the analogue sites. However, it may also be that additional genetic resources exist in 'future climate' areas where the crops are grown, but are stored in national genebanks or other collections within countries rather than in international institutes; these countries may not be parties to the This overview of the research and development dynamics of rice and beans in Costa Rica provides a picture of the extent to which the country has depended on external inputs of germplasm for improving both a native (bean) and an introduced (rice) crop. Most of the exchanges described here took place either when the circulation of PGRs was not such a politically charged issue as it is today, or through the operation of international institutions which, even after the inception of the CBD and its more restrictive bilateral rules for accessing and exchanging germplasm, have continued to operate under a regime of facilitated access and free distribution. As the sharing of germplasm across borders becomes more controversial, and climate change exacerbates the challenges faced by plant breeders, clear rules and procedures capable of maintaining and enhancing international exchanges of PGRFA are needed, in order to allow for continuing development of more resilient and sustainable agricultural and food systems. The complex international scenario surrounding access and benefit sharing, and uncertainties on how to deal with genetic resources at national level, with the CBD-inspired bilateral rules and the ITPGRFA's multilateral approach, have caused some disengagement among stakeholders who traditionally participated in the exchanges of material and information. However, if the MLS is implemented properly, the country's obligations and those of its research partners would be clearly defined, allowing for the continuation and enhancement of Costa Rica's participation in collaborative crop improvement efforts like those presented here. In this direction, the work of the dedicated team of researchers and policymakers in advancing the implementation of the ITPGRFA in Costa Rica within and beyond the GRPI2 project is crucial, and it is hoped that the results and reflections presented here may be of use within such process."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2221144238.json b/main/part_2/2221144238.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6577e67ba9d45bbc60aabb8e61437f89cefa6fd --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2221144238.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"dc2f00ae84b9136f73420aa17a5c1bae","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f69108f7-7f06-4c50-8e01-ad9aacebc5da/content","id":"-1743430654"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3bd65399-d511-4778-8a8f-3adf0c3a5d4d","content":"El método de espectroscopia de infrarrojo cercano se utiliza ampliamente para la determinación de ciertos compuestos químicos. Actualmente es una herramienta de soporte para los programas de mejoramiento, que permite la determinación de compuestos como proteína, almidón, aceite, humedad y cenizas, entre otros. Un total de 554 muestras pertenecientes a 24 razas de maíz (Zea mays L.) pigmentado fueron utilizadas en el desarrollo y validación de modelos matemáticos para la estimación del contenido de antocianinas por espectroscopía de infrarrojo cercano (NIR), a través de la espectroscopía de UV-Vis como método de referencia. Se determinó el perfil de antocianinas mediante cromatografía líquida de alta resolución (HPLC). Los más altos contenidos de antocianinas se encontraron en muestras de grano de maíz C11-IXT de Tlaxcala, México, con hasta 1989.9 μg Pel g -1 PS. Los mayores porcentajes de cianidina 3-glucósido, pelargonidina 3-glucósido y peonidina 3-glucósido fueron 48.79 %, 39.84 % y 12.14 %, respectivamente. Muestras de la accesión BOZM342 destacaron por el contenido de cianidina 3-glucósido, que fue de 628.32 μg g -1 PS. Se desarrollaron y analizaron 32 modelos de calibración de los cuales destacaron dos por cumplir los parámetros para una calibración de NIR robusta, con altos coeficientes de determinación para las validaciones cruzadas (0.64 y 0.65). Los modelos de NIR presentados en este trabajo se pueden utilizar para la determinación de antocianinas totales y apoyar a los programas de mejoramiento de maíces azules.Palabras clave: Zea mays, antocianinas, HPLC, maíz pigmentado, NIR.Near infrared reflectance, NIR, is a method largely used for rapid and robust determination of chemical compounds. It is currently used to support breeding programs to analyze protein, oil, starch, moisture and ash content, among others. Five hundred fifty four samples belonging to 24 races of pigmented maize (Zea mays L.) were used in the development and validation of mathematical models to estimate anthocyanin content by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), using UV-Vis spectroscopy as a reference method. The anthocyanins profile was determined through high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The highest anthocyanin contents were found in C11-IXT maize grain samples from Tlaxcala, México; containing up to 1989.97μg Pel g -1 DW. The highest percentages of cyanidin 3-glucoside, pelargonidin 3-glucoside and peonidin 3-glucoside were 48.79 %, 39.84 % and 12.14 %, respectively. Samples of the BOZM342 accession were outstanding for its cyanidin 3-glucoside content of 628.32 μg Pel g -1 PS. Thirty two calibration models were developed and analyzed, and two of them fulfilled the parameters for a robust NIR calibration, with high coefficients of determination for cross validations (0.64 and 0.65). The NIR models presented here can be used for determination of total anthocyanins and provide support for blue maize breeding programs. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2221818018.json b/main/part_2/2221818018.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f8de6b92027b8de3d4a0a02323d7b1cb8550f1e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2221818018.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"aedfc7515d8fcdb323207d6e67c36961","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/00795236-46d0-47ed-8386-db33687d0aac/retrieve","id":"1984908194"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"146dde6a-b4ab-42eb-8729-edf99beee17d","content":"The 'Expanding Utilization of Roots, Tubers and Banana and Reducing Their Postharvest Losses' (RTB-ENDURE) is a three-year project that is being implemented in Uganda. The goal is to contribute to improved food security and incomes for RTB-producing communities in East Africa, including producers and other stakeholders along the value chain. This initiative addresses postharvest management of RTB crops and explores potentials for expanding the utilization of potato, sweetpotato, banana and cassava, and repositioning them as added value crops.Four research sub-projects are operational: (i) ambient storage and improved agronomic practices in a bid to reduce postharvest losses and extend the marketing period for ware potato; (ii) agronomic practices, waxing and relative humidity storage for fresh cassava roots to extend shelf-life and capture emerging markets opportunities; (iii) sweetpotato silage to mitigate animal feed constraints faced by smallholder pig farmers; and (iv) promotion of cooking banana varieties with intrinsic longer shelf life, sucker staggering and storage to even out market supply and promote product differentiation.In order to achieve the sweetpotato sub-project's key objectives, it was deemed necessary to build the capacities of sweetpotato and pig farmers to process sweetpotato residues into silage to be fed to pigs primarily in the dry season when pig farmers face serious challenges to access quality and affordable feedstuff.It is against this background that NALIRRI, in collaboration with the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), the Bavubuka Twekembe Group, the International Potato Center (CIP), CHAIN-Uganda, VEDCO and the Kamenyamiggo Zonal Agricultural and Development Research Institute (ZARDI) has held a series of training workshops to strengthen the technical capacities of selected stakeholders in the two target districts, namely Masaka (Nyendo Senyange and Buwunga) and Kamuli (Butansi and Bugulumbya sub-counties). The major objective of the workshops was to equip participants with knowledge of sweetpotato silage making and utilization. Training of Trainers (TOT) and farmers' trainings on silage making were already conducted between August and October 2015. However, these additional trainings were deemed necessary in order to i) strengthen participants' s capacities in utilizing sweetpotato silage; ii) impart content that has been validated and/or fine-tuned and/or adapted based on the most recent findings from the research undertaken by the sweetpotato sub-project's team over the previous two years; iii) target additional participants.Sweetpotato is the third most important food crop after cassava and bananas in Uganda. Currently, sweetpotato is the major food crop in the Lake Victoria region. The crop has potentials to benefit poor rural households and urban consumers especially when other crops fail or in specific seasons before the main harvest.Sweetpotato is a means to address one of the most serious health and nutrition problems of Uganda, Vitamin A deficiency which is a major risk factor for pregnant and lactating women. The Orange Fleshed Sweetpotato (OFSP) cultivars contain particularly high levels of carotenoids and are equalled only by carrot as a source of pro-vitamin A. Sweetpotato roots provide a source of carbohydrates, calcium, ascorbic acid (vitamin C). Sweetpotato roots may be eaten boiled, steamed or processed into simple products such as chips, bread, local brew/drink, juice, pancakes and composite flour (mixed with maize, millet and soya flour). In some communities, tender (young) sweetpotato leaves are consumed as a vegetable. Sweetpotato contributes about 20% of total crop residues provided by vines, non-commercial sweetpotato roots, peels which are very good source of livestock feedAlthough sweet potatoes are a good source of energy (roots) and protein (vines), they are highly perishable. As a result, substantial amounts of vines are wasted during periods of peak harvests, yet farmers suffer from feed scarcity during the dry season. In order to make good use of sweetpotato residues (vines and roots) there is need to conserve them in form of silage which has the potential to mitigate seasonal feed shortages and help cope with seasonal feed prices fluctuations that many smallholder livestock farmers experience. It also provides opportunity to reduce waste in urban market and at household level as well as it can open up business opportunities for youth and women. The ToT workshop was conducted at VEDCO premises on 13 th December 2016. The farmer workshops were conducted at Kiwungu Baptist Church, Butansi sub-county and at Bukyonza Primary School, Bukyonza village, Bugulumbya sub-county on 14 th and 15 th December 2016, respectively. The workshops were organized and conducted by the International Potato Centre (CIP), VEDCO, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), National Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), Bavubuka Twekembe group.The facilitators of the workshop were; Dr. Jolly Kabirizi (NaLIRRI), Dr. Peter Lule (ILRI), Mr. Kizito (VEDCO), Mr. Vincent Lutwama and Mr. Dan Isabirye (Bavubuka Twekembe Group) and Mr. John Kigongo (NaLIRRI). A total of 287 participants (150 female) attended the workshops in Masaka and Kamuli districts (Table 1 and Annex 1). The participants started with a prayer after which each participant introduced him/herself (name, institution/district and experience on sweetpotato as a food and animal feed). All participants reported that they had experience with working with sweetpotatoes but five extension staff from Masaka district reported that they had no information on sweetpotato silage production and that they were very happy to attend the workshop.Official opening in Masaka district by Dr. MayegaParticipants were requested to indicate at least two expectations from the workshop. Below is a summary of TOTs expectations.(i) Masaka district Figure 1 shows local feed resources used by farmers to feed pigs in Kamuli and Masaka districts. This was part of the RTB-ENDURE project findings presented during the end of project held from 6 th to 7 th December 2016, Imperial Golf View Hotel, Entebbe, Uganda.Table 2 shows nutritive value of common feed resources. ▪ Sweetpotato is the 3 rd most important food crop after cassava and bananas in Uganda ▪ Uganda is a leading producer of SPs (about 2.2 million tons/year) ▪ Grown for food and feed security ▪ Fresh form can only be fed for a short period of time after harvest ▪ Preservation of vines in form of silage to extend shelf lifeTables 3 and 4 show selected sweetpotato varieties and their attributes. ▪ Sweetpotato residues are seasonal and highly perishable ▪ A lot of sweetpotato residues are wasted in the fields after harvesting ▪ Research conducted by CIP in Kamuli district in the framework of RTB-ENDURE shows that farmers waste up to 24 and 22% of the vines and non-marketable roots (Table 5) ▪ Pig farmers face feed scarcity in specific periods of the year (Figure 2). ▪ Silage is cut green plant material that is sealed in airtight silos without air and water----a silo is a structure for storing bulk materials such as maize grain ▪ Silage is produced by the activities of naturally-occurring bacteria that convert some of the plant sugars into organic acids that preserve nutritional qualities ▪ Silage can be stored for many months and still have up to 85% of the energy and protein value of the original fodder crop.Some of the forages used to make silage: ▪ Sweetpotato vines and roots ▪ Napier grass ▪ Prevents wastage of valuable feed resources ▪ Mitigate seasonal feed shortages ▪ Help cope with seasonal feed prices fluctuations that many smallholder pig farmers experience ▪ Provide nutrients required by the animal, which may be deficient in the diet ▪ Adequate feed is available all year round; hence animals remain in good health ▪ Silage can be made using fresh or, better, wilted material ▪ Silage quality is maintained for longer than is hay quality, because hay oxidizes during storage ▪ High silage protein content and digestibility makes it an excellent complement to grass feeds ▪ Silage production is one of the technologies to reduce methane gas which is also responsible for global warming ▪ Silage making as a service delivery is an opportunity for investments by unemployed youth who loathe agriculture as a direct employment option.▪ Provides a regular supply of high quality animal feeds, leading to good returns from the enterprise ▪ Promotes conservation of excess residues ensuring year-round supply of high quality feeds ▪ It is affordable for small-scale farmers who make and use small quantities of silage at a time ▪ It is environmentally friendly since it does not release effluent and the sac can be re-used.✓ Sweetpotato residues ✓ Black polythene tubes, 2.5metres, gauge 600-800mm, ✓ Maize bran or molasses ✓ Watering can & water ✓ Forage chopper or a machete ✓ Tarpaulin ✓ 100 kg sac ✓ Weighing scale ✓ Sisal twine ✓ 4 people to provide labour to produce 1,000 kg of silage/ day.1. The crop should be ready to harvest: the seed of forage sorghum or maize should be soft but not milky when you squeeze it open 2. Harvest or purchase sweetpotato residues 3. Spread the residues for at least one day to reduce the moisture content 4. Chop the residues into 2.5cm length pieces using a motorize forage chopper or a panga 5. Measure one bag of well compressed chopped residues (about 70kgs) and spread it on the canvas 6. Mix 1 litre molasses with 3 litres of water and sprinkle the mixture over the material or mix 1 kg of maize bran with 10 kg of chopped SP residues and mix thoroughly. Maize bran produces better silage because it reduces the effluent from the silage 7. Pleat the black polythene tube (about 1.5 meters long, gauge of 600-800 mm for every 70 kg of residues) lengthwise 8. Tie firmly with the sisal twine at 30cm distance from the cut edge, fold back the edge and tie once again to exclude the air 9. Turn the polythene bag inside out 10. Roll down or fold back the top of the polythene tube and place the tube into another synthetic sac used for packing sugar, salt, rice and maize flour. 11. The sac protects the polythene tube from being damaged by rodents and hot weather 12. Put the material in the polythene tube. You can also use plastic drums instead of the polythene tube 13. Compress the mixture firmly to exclude all the air. You can stand inside the bag and compress the mixture down thoroughly using the feet 14. Repeat the steps until the polythene tube is full 15. Add the mixture to the polythene tube in small quantities and compress until it is full 16. Hold the top of the polythene bag firmly excluding the air 17. Tie the silage material and make sure the silo is air tight. Silage is formed through anaerobic fermentation by microorganisms.Table 7 shows estimated cost of producing 500 kgs of sweetpotato silage. ▪ A plastic sheet (about 0.1 mm thick) is spread over the ground ▪ The material for making silage is chopped using and placed on the sheet or cemented floor ▪ The material is entirely covered with a plastic sheet ▪ Proper tread pressure has to be applied, and complete sealing is required ▪ The size of a silo depends on the number of animals.▪ Stack silo is suitable only for large pig farms or if large volume of sales is ensured ▪ If for sale, buyers will also need to consume it quickly and come back frequently (so either large pig farmers or likely repeatedly purchase small amounts each time) ▪ To ensure continuous sales during key months, the production will depend on the consumption rate and the ratio between months of consumption/production.Trench/pit silo ▪ A trench silo is built underground or semi-underground ▪ A tractor or heavy loads are used to compact the material within the silo ▪ Thereafter the silo is covered with a plastic sheet, weighed down with soil. This help maintain anaerobic conditions.▪ Wait for 30 days until the fermentation process is complete before use ▪ Carefully and step-by-step open a small portion of the silo when need arises for feeding and seal the remaining silage immediately after the removal. ▪ The silage made using this technology is sweet smelling and brown when ready ▪ Supplementing sweetpotato vines silage at a ratio of 60:40 (Silage:Concentrate) improves pig growth performance (Tables 8, 9 and 10). ▪ The amount of silage to be fed per animal will depend on the age and weight of the animal ▪ Clean the feed troughs after feeding the silage ▪ Opened silage should be fed to the animals within 3 days. How much silage should be made?The quantity of silage to store depends on several factors such as: ▪ Type of animal (goats, cattle, pigs, etc.) ▪ How many animals are to be fed ▪ Weight of the animals ▪ For how long they are to be fed ▪ The storage space available ▪ The amount of excess feed to conserve ▪ Forage dry matter content ▪ Available labour, etc...▪ Sweetpotato residues are a valuable feed resource in smallholder systems ▪ SP residues are highly perishable ▪ Use of SP silage can even out the supply of feed on smallholder pig farmers ▪ Supplementing SPV silage with a concentrate at a level of 40% improves pig growth performance at lowers feeding costs.CIP and ILRI were represented by Mr. Peter Lule who briefed farmers on the RTB-ENDURE objectives and activities. He informed participants that in both districts ILRI had carried out an assessment of the local available feed resources and pig feeding practices. The main feed related challenges (incl. quality of feeds, seasonality of the forage based feeds like sweetpotato vines) were also investigated. Therefore, in order to overcome these challenges, ILRI partnered with CIP to test, validate and promote sweetpotato silage. The reasons for the choice of sweetpotato silage were; (a). Sweetpotato vines were the most common forage-based feed given to pigs; (b) Sweetpotato is commonly grown in all parts of Uganda; and (c) ILRI had successfully pilot tested sweetpotato silage in other countries.Mr. Lule pointed out that most of the farmers had been trained in the first year of project implementation. The purpose of this second training was to avail to them more information on how to supplement the silage and the share the project findings (e.g., weight gains for pigs fed on silage-based diet). He also indicated that silage training and business centers had been established by the project in both Kamuli and Masaka districts. These centers are open to farmers who want to hire forage choppers, buy silage and access information on silage production and utilization and other animal husbandry practices. He advised the farmers to get in touch with the silage centers.After presenting some of the key findings from the research that had been carried out, he concluded by encouraging farmers to take up the technology as it would help in bridging the gap when maize bran is expensive and during the dry season.Where can I get improved Napier grass varieties? A:The National Livestock Resources Research Institute, Nakyesasa. Q:When zero grazing had just come in Uganda, we were not using Napier grass, we used to have Guatemala grass. What happened to it? A:The grass is fibrous when it matures and the animals tend to reject it. Q:Are there any places where farmers can get already made silage on sale? A:Yes, you can get silage from NaLIRRI-Nakyesasa but you can also get sweetpotato silage from Bavubuka Twekembe Group as well as the recently established silage training and business centers. Q:What are the suitable storage facilities for silage? A:The store must be well ventilated and free from rodents. Q:The initial silage technology from Kenya had a tube at the bottom. What is the difference between that initial silage technology and the current silage technology? A:That technology is expensive but suitable when maize bran is not available. Q:What amounts of silage are supposed to be given to the different animals? A:This depends on the type of animal but it is about 4 kg/day for mature pigs and about 15 kgs/day for mature cows. Q:Can mixing hay and molasses be a feed for animals? A:Yes but it must be supplemented with a source of protein and minerals. Q:How have you overcome the problem of scarcity of sweetpotato vines? A:Sweetpotato vines are seasonal and large amount go to waste during the bump harvest.How can you compare the nutrient feed block and the silage? A:The two are different in the nutritional quality and feeding management:-Difference in the required ingredients -Difference in cost of production for both feeds. Q:A certain farmer had pigs which were stunted in growth at six months. So he was asking what the problem was and how can he improve them? A:They may be underfed or their health status is poor.(ii) Kamuli districtHow long can the nutritional feed block be stored? A:It can be stored as long as you keep it dry to avoid moulding. Q:What are the ingredients for making the nutritional feed blocks? How many cows can feed on one nutrient feed block? A:This is on the size of the block and weight of the animal. A cow consumes about 3% of its live weight. This means that for a cow of 400 kg, you need a block of about 12kg. This can also be fed to the animal as a Total Mixed Feed ration (TMR). Q:Is it possible to have pasture demonstration fields at Kamenyamiggo we can use at to demonstrate silage production? A:You are advised to contact Mukono ZARDI. Q:Is there an alternative to dry nutrient feed blocks if I cannot afford to construct a simple solar drier? A:You can sun dry them but they take long to dry properly. You have to keep turning the blocks. A simple solar drier is the best option to dry nutrient feed blocks. Q:Is it possible to use other materials like cassava leaves to make silage since we feed them to pigs? A:Silage can be made from cassava leaves but you need to be very careful on the varieties. Some cassava varieties contain high level of dangerous anti-nutritional compounds. Q:Can silage be fed to other animals such as goats? A:Silage can be fed to cattle, goats, rabbits and sheep. Q:How can you improve on the sugar content of silage? A:You can add diluted molasses. Q:What are the future perspectives for this project? A:The project ends in December. The district can allocate funds to disseminate the technology to farmers. Q:How can we store silage for a longer period without damage by rodents? A:You must control the rodents using cats. Q:How can we get hydroponic feeds? A:You can produce the feeds on a small scale. Q:Can we mix sweetpotato vines and maize when making silage? A:You can but it might not be economic. Q:In the recent trials conducted at Kamenyamiggo ZARDI we mixed soybean with chopped sweetpotato vines, do you think this can be recommended? A:Adding soybean is good because it improves the protein content of the silage but it also increases the cost of the silage. Q:Sweetpotato silage gets spoilt in the second year, why do you recommend this tube silage technology? A:The tube technology is very convenient for the small scale farmers. You must make sure that you keep out air to avoid rotting. Q:Is salt not required when making silage?A: You do not need salt.The participants were involved in practical silage making conducted by the youth group members as shown in the pictures below.Weighing maize branParticipants fill the plastic tube silo with a mixture of chopped sweetpotato vines and maize branParticipants from Bugulubya sub-county, Kamuli districtIn Kamuli district the workshops were held at Kiwungu Baptist Church in Butansi sub-county and Bukyonza Primary School in Bukyonza village, Bugulumbya sub-county.In Butansi the workshop was opened with a prayer by the Chairperson of Butansi Piggery Farmers' Group (BPFG), Mr. Paul Mudhasi. He informed the participants that sweetpotato silage has helped their group members to improve pig production and to empower women and youth in development by exposing them to new skills and knowledge. A total of 70 farmers (37 women and 33 men) participated in the workshop at Butansi sub-county (Annex 1). Of the 70 participants, 20 were below 35years of age.In Bugulumbya the workshop started with an opening prayer followed by self-introductions. The introductions revealed that three (3) participants were not aware of silage as well as the topic of the training (they had just heard about a workshop and decided to attend but did not know what it was about). Of the 70 participants, 20 were below 35years of age.During the self-introductions, farmers in Bugulubya sub-county extended their sincere appreciation to the project. They reported that:• Their perceptions that a pig must eat in bulk to grow fast was changed • They always had their pigs at first oestrus (heat) after 11 months but the current feeding regimes and technology have lowered it to 8 months • They realized that they wasted a lot of feed resources but had not realized how significant the losses were • The vines that they used to waste is what they currently use to generate money as well as feed their pigs for fasten growth rates • They also recognized the reduced time spent during the search for feed • They no longer lament over scarce feed resources and gave an example of the current feed crisis that had not had a significant effect on their pig production systems • They all thanked the project for having improved their market access.In Masaka district the workshops were held at St. Paul Primary School, Kitovu, Senyange subcounty and at Buwunga Sub-county headquarters, Buwunga sub-county.The training in Senyange sub-county was attended by 54 farmers (11 men and 33 women). The training in Buwunga sub-county was attended by 55 farmers (27 men and 28 women).In both districts, each participant was requested to write down at least two expectations from the workshops. They are summarized in the table below.Nyendo Ssenyange sub-county• Learning new things from fellow farmers • Want to learn about feeding of silage Q. Is it possible to ensile Bidens pilosa (Black Jack) and what happens if you make silage from wondering jew? A.No research work has been done to evaluate the nutritive value and ensilability of B. pilosa. Besides, the practicability is the limitation to the successful utilization of Bidens pilosa as silage. For example: how much of it can you collect to make silage? The same conditions hold for production of wondering jew bases silageA. Addition of salt to silage is geared towards prevention of mould growth in silage. However, with the current method of silage production moulds can be completely eliminated if proper procedures are followed. Addition of fishmeal may contribute positively to the protein content but may increase the costs of production of silage.Q.Where can we get forage choppers from and how much are they? A.You were provided with a forage chopper at the sub-county. Q.Can silage be made without a motorized forage chopper? A.Yes you can make silage from sweetpotato vines chopped using simple tools such as pangas Q:How do you use molasses to make silage? A:1kg of molasses mixed in 2litres of water. Then 1 litre of this to be added to 10kgs of the material to be conserved Q:Do we feed sweetpotato silage to pigs only? A:It is also fed to any other livestock like cattle, goats, among others Q:How do we control swine fever in pigs? A:Controlled by hygiene, use of disinfectants and avoid pork from other places on your farm Q:How much concentrate can a pig of 50kgs be fed? A:At least 2kgs per day Q:Does inbreeding in pigs have an effect on piglets? A:Stunted growth Q:At what stage or age do we wean piglets? A:At 2 months of age Q:Can sweetpotato silage be used as fattener in pigs? A:Sweetpotato silage is good as a source of feed to fatten pigs but in addition concentrates are also required Q:Marketing of pigs and piglets is still a major problem in farming, how can this be solved? A:By forming farmers' groups or cooperatives so as to have one common interest and market Q:While making sweetpotato silage, do we use leaves only? A:Both vines and stalks Q:Is there any vaccine against African Swine Fever (ASF)? A:Not yet developed Q:Can soybean replace fishmeal during concentrate formulation? A:Both can be used depending on the availability of the materials Q:What could be the best way to store the silo bags? A:Where there are not rats and avoid storing under direct sunlight Q: Do you add mineral powder while making silage? A:Not necessary Q:Can you use molasses and maize bran at same time to conserve sweetpotato residues? A:Just need to use one additive Q:Is it possible to feed silage and maize bran at a ago?A:Yes, but maize bran should be mixed with other ingredients like fishmeal, minerals, etc, to make a concentrate. Q:Can you make silage from cassava leaves? A:Yes, since cassava leaves contain cyanide this helps to reduce it. Q:Is it recommended to cook sweetpotato peels before feeding them to pigs? A:Yes, but they should not be overcooked Q:If banana stems are chopped into small pieces, can they be fed to pigs too? A:Not recommended because they are too fibrous to be fed to pigs.The Bavubuka Twekembe Group demonstrated silage making using the polythene tube technology. Participants were requested to list down key lessons learned and new experiences from the workshop:• Some farmers reported that the use of sweetpotato silage on their farms have saved them time and labour to look for alternative sources of feeds whose quality is very low • Silage also increase pig production because of increased growth rate and the quality of the pork (not fatty) • Partial substitution of maize bran with silage has also reduced their feeding costs • Some farmers indicated to be able to sell silage to earn their living • The youth in the community who are not able to make silage, can now sell vines to farmers who make silage • There is a need to mobilize the youth into groups and to equip them with skills on commercial sweetpotato silage production • I have been motivated to make utilization of the limited resources to earn income • You are well informed on issues concerning livestock nutrition • Silage production as a commercial enterprise is a new experience for the youth. We have to encourage unemployed youth to star making silage for sale • The workshop has been an eye opener for all of us. We realized that we can cut down the cost of feeding pigs during the dry season by ensiling sweetpotato residues • Marketing pigs can be improved through group formation • Commercial silage production is labour intensive. Availability of low cost forage choppers is a key requirement to commercial silage production. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2242953247.json b/main/part_2/2242953247.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..102417baa59a7a42a2870a6c51018ecf18be84b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2242953247.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"26dc6355872918ecc65231af511065ab","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H041806.pdf","id":"-124975703"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5bdb0745-55d3-44cc-bf4d-4eb9bc1844e9","content":"Rain-fed agriculture is practiced on 80 % of the world's agricultural land area, and generates 65-70 % of the world's staple foods, but it also produces most of the food for the poor communities in developing countries and least favored areas. The low and variable productivity of these lands is the major cause of poverty for 70 % of the world's poor inhabiting these lands. The largest challenges of poverty-related undernutrition are found in arid, semi-arid and dry-humid, rain-fed regions of the developing countries (Falkenmark and Rockstrom 1993). The distinct feature of rain-fed agriculture in these developing countries is that both productivity improvement and expansion has been slower relative to irrigated agriculture (Rosegrant et. al. 2002). But, as Pretty and Hine (2001) suggest, there is a 100 % yield increase potential in rain-fed agriculture in the developing countries, compared to only 10 % for irrigated crops. This calls for increased efforts to upgrade rain-fed systems globally and, especially in developing countries to provide sufficient and affordable food and nutrition to the vast populations.India ranks first among the rain-fed agricultural countries of the world in terms of both extent (86 M ha) and value of produce. Due to little alternative opportunities available outside the agricultural sector, the high population of landless households and agricultural laborers, and low land and labor productivity, most of the poverty is concentrated in rain-fed regions (Singh 2001). At the same time, there is growing evidence to suggest that agriculture continues to play a key role in economic development and poverty reduction in these regions ((World Bank 2005;Irez and Roe 2000). Some of the available estimates suggest that 1 % increase in agricultural productivity translates to 0.6 -1.2 % decline in the percentage of rural poor (Thirtle et al. 2002). The only silver lining in the scenario is that there appears to exist a significant potential for raising productivity in rain-fed systems. Yield gap analyses, undertaken by the Comprehensive Assessment, for major rain-fed crops found farmers' yield to be a factor of 2-4 times lower than the achievable yields and offering substantive opportunities for realizing the potential of rain-fed agriculture (Molden 2007).Rain-fed areas in India are highly diverse, ranging from resource-rich areas with good agricultural potential to resource-constrained areas with much more constrained potential. It is in the rain-fed regions where cultivation of nutritious (coarse) cereals (91 %), pulses (91 %), oilseeds (80 %) and cotton (65 %) predominates. Rosegrant et al. (2002) employing the IMPACT model have estimated that even by 2025, one-third of India's cereal production shall be contributed by rain-fed areas (Table 1). Rain-fed agriculture supports 40 % of India's population. Earlier, the rain-fed farming systems, because of its risky nature, were dependent upon locally available inputs and grew traditional drought-resistant crops. But over-time cropping systems have changed (Kanwar 2001), and farmers have started cultivating high-value (but vulnerable) crops requiring intensive use of costly inputs. The last 4 decades of Indian agriculture, which registered overall impressive gains in food production, food security and rural poverty reduction in better-endowed 'Green Revolution' areas, by-passed the less-favored rain-fed areas, which were not partners in this process of agricultural transformation. Particularly, the last decade has witnessed serious distress among the more enterprising small and marginal farmers in the rain-fed regions who opted to replace, with little success, traditional low-value crops with high-value (but more vulnerable) and input-intensive crops through borrowed resources. As an extreme desperate step, over 25,000 farmers, mainly from rain-fed regions, committed suicide during the past 9 years-every 8 hours a farmer took his life (Lobo 2007). Besides several other factors related to agriculture sector as a whole, e.g., adverse meteorological conditions resulting in long dry spells and droughts, unseasonal rains and extended moisture-stress periods with no mechanisms of storing and conserving the surplus rain to tide over the scarcity/deficit periods, were the major causes for non-remunerative yields and heightened distress. It is only recently that the Government of India has constituted a National Rain-fed Area Authority (2006) to address these issues and develop and implement a comprehensive single-window program for the development of rain-fed areas in the country.Rainfall is a truly random factor in the rain-fed production system, and its variation and uncertainty is high in areas of low rainfall. Semi-arid regions, however, may receive enough annual rainfall to support crops but it is distributed so unevenly in time and/ or space that rain-fed agriculture becomes unviable (Reij et al. 1988). Rockstrom and Falkenmark (2000) note that due to high rainfall variation in semi-arid regions, a decrease of one standard deviation from the mean annual rainfall often leads to the complete loss of a crop. Whereas in the arid zones (< 300 mm/annum) absolute water scarcity constitutes the major limiting factor in agriculture; in the semi-arid and dry sub-humid tropical regions managing extreme rainfall variability in time and space is the greatest water challenge. Dry spells, which generally are 2-4 weeks of no rainfall during critical growth stages causing partial or complete crop failures, often occur in every cropping season. The probability of deficient rainfall (deficiency in rainfall numerically equal to or greater than 25% of the normal) in India during the southwest monsoon period is: once in 2.5 years in West Rajasthan; once in 3 years in Gujarat, east Rajasthan, western Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Jammu and Kash-mir, Rayalaseema and Telangana; once in 4 years in the south interior Karnataka, eastern Uttar Pradesh and Vidarbha; once in 5 years in West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Konkan, Coastal Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand and Orissa; and once in 15 years in Assam (very rare) and Kerala. Even dry sub-humid regions, where rainfall varies between 750-1,200 mm, experience contingent drought situations due to a break in monsoon conditions. Based on its time of occurrence, such rainless periods/ agricultural drought may be termed as early season drought, mid-season drought and terminal drought. While early season drought can be mitigated through replacement with shortduration varieties or change in the cropping pattern, droughts at the latter two stages have potential to cause serious damages to crop production (Figure1). Terminal droughts are more critical as the final grain yield is strongly related to water availability during the reproductive stage. Apart from these short-duration droughts (dry spells), in the low to medium rainfall regions, the rainfall amount and distribution may be sufficient to raise only a low water requiring hardy crop but not a sensitive crop with high water requirements. Introduction of such a crop for economic reasons leads to the early appearance of drought conditions and crop failures.Though water deficiency at critical crop growth stages is the major constraint of rainfed agriculture, water itself may not always be the primary limiting factor for food production even on the so-called 'drylands'. Analysis of farmers' participatory field trials in more than 300 villages, showed that the existing practices of rain-fed agriculture has depleted soils not only in organic matter and macro-nutrients but also in micro-and secondary nutrients, and substantial gains (70 to 120%) are observed when crops were supplied with adequate quantities of these nutrients (Wani et al. 2005;Rego et al. 2005).Most research studies on the impact of irrigation on crop yields are conducted under high input use and on small plots, and thus fail to capture the scale impacts at district/ regional level and depict a high effect of irrigation. But, under actual farming conditions in developing countries like India, the exogenously supplied inputs show a great deal of spatial variation and impact the overall gains at the district/ regional level. An exercise based on district level secondary statistics to assess the effect of 'irrigation' and 'no irrigation' for the various crops in the 16 major states of India (where the rainfall is less than 1,500 mm/annum) revealed that: i. productivity increase due to irrigation varies between 7-74 %, except for soybeans (0 %) and rabi rice (550 %);ii. achievable yields are much higher than productivity levels achieved through irrigation and improved practices at the district level;iii. productivity enhancement due to irrigation is less than 30 % among oilseed crops, except for castor (52 %) and sunflower (47 %); and iv. among cereals, millets (pearl millet and finger millet), maize and barley recorded less than 30 % increase in productivity due to irrigation.Yield differences between irrigated and rain-fed areas are more pronounced when the crop is grown under a variety of agro-ecological regions, compared to its concentration in few and similar districts. Though the effect of irrigation on crop yields suggest low gains for few crops, on-farm trials and evaluation reports of watershed projects (Joshi et al. 2004;Sastry et al. 2004) suggest that the effect of supplementary irrigation on rain-fed crop yields is considerably higher (Table 2). Therefore, an assessment was made to identify opportunities for water harvesting and supplemental irrigation to overcome dry spells during mid/ terminal droughts so as to stabilize the production. Supplemental irrigation is a key strategy, so far under utilized, to unlock rain-fed yield potentials. The objective of supplemental irrigation is not to provide stress-free conditions through the crop growth for maximum yields, but to provide just enough water to tide over moisture scarcity at critical growth stages to produce optimal yields per unit of water (Oweiss et al. 1999;Sharma and Smakhtin 2004). The existing evidence indicates that supplemental irrigation ranging from 50-200 mm/ season (50-200 m 3 /ha) is sufficient to mediate yield-reducing dry spells in most years and rain-fed systems, and thereby stabilize and optimize yield levels. Agarwal (2000) suggested that India should not have to suffer from droughts, if local water balances were managed better. Collecting small amounts using limited macro-catchments water harvesting, local springs, shallow groundwater tables or most importantly conventional water harvesting during rainy season can achieve this. The assessment presented in this study presents the estimation of available (surplus) rainfall runoff during August (second fortnight)/ September that is required mainly to mitigate the terminal drought. The study identified the dominant rain-fed districts for different crops (contributing up to 85 % of total rain-fed production), made an assessment of the surplus/ runoff available for water harvesting and supplementary irrigation in the identified districts, estimated the regional water use efficiency and effect of supplemental irrigation on increasing production of different crops and, finally, a preliminary estimate of the economics of water harvesting for supplemental irrigation in rain-fed areas.To make an improvement over the existing criterion of the 'fixed' or 'variable' percentage of the irrigated area in the district, all the districts in the descending order of area coverage (for a given crop) limited to a cumulative 85 % of total rain-fed area for each crop in the country, were identified and termed as 'dominant rain-fed districts' (for a given crop). The crops covered are sunflower, soybeans, rapeseed mustard, groundnut, castor, cotton, sorghum, pearl millet, maize, pigeon peas and rice (in kharif), and linseed and chickpeas (in rabi). Thus an area of 39 M ha was accounted under selected crops. This helped in the identification of the major region for a crop, in that although all the crops are grown in most of the districts, there are a few crops that have specific agro-climatic requirements. Details on dominant rain-fed districts for various crops are given in Table 3. Development activities related to a specific rain-fed crop should be taken up first in these identified districts and secure a major impact on productivity. Total rainfall in India is spread over few rainy days and fewer rain events (about 100 hours in the season) with high intensity, resulting in large surface runoff and erosion and temporary stagnation. In either of the cases this 'green water' is not available for plant growth, and has very low productivity. Local harvesting of a small part of this water and utilizing the same for supplementary/ protective irrigation to mitigate the impacts of devastating dry spells, offer a good opportunity for increasing productivity in the fragile rain-fed systems (Rockstrom et al. 2001;Sharma et al. 2005;Wani et al. 2003). For a national/ regional level planning on supplementary irrigation, one needs to make an assessment of the total and available surplus runoff, and the potential for its gainful utilization. In the present study, both crop season-wise and annual water balance analyses were done for each of the selected crops cultivated in the identified districts. Whereas, the annual water balance analysis assessed the surplus and/or deficit during the year to estimate the water availability and losses through evaporation; the seasonal crop water balance assessed changes in temporal availability of rainfall and plant water requirements. The water requirement satisfaction index was used for assessing the sufficiency of rainfall vis-à-vis the crop water requirements. The total surplus from a district is obtained by multiplication of seasonal surplus with the rain-fed area under the given crop (Ferguson 1996). The total surplus available from a cropped region is obtained by adding the surplus from the individual dominant districts identified for each crop. An estimated amount of 11.5 M ha-m runoff is generated through 39 M ha of the prioritized rain-fed area. Out of the surplus of 11.5 M ha-m, 4.1 M ha-m is generated by about 6.5 M ha of rain-fed rice alone. Another 1.32 and 1.30 M ha-m of runoff is generated from soybeans (2.8 M ha) and chickpea (3.35 M ha), respectively. Total rain-fed coarse cereals (10.7 M ha) generate about 2.1M ha-m of runoff. Spatial distribution of runoff on agro ecological sub-region and river basin-wise is shown in Figure 2. Based on the experiences from watershed management research and large-scale development efforts, practical harvesting of runoff is possible only when the harvestable amount is larger than 50 mm or greater than 10 % of the seasonal rainfall (CRIDA 2001). Therefore, surplus runoff generating areas/ districts were identified after deleting the districts with seasonal surplus of less than or equal to 50 mm of surplus, and those districts generating runoff of less than 10 % of seasonal rainfall. Table 4 shows the summary of surplus and deficit for various crops after deletion of districts, which generate less than the utilizable amount of runoff. This constitutes about 10.5 M ha of rain-fed area, which generates seasonal runoff of less than 50 mm (10.25 M ha) or less than 10 % of the seasonal rainfall (0.25 M ha). Thus the total estimated runoff surplus for various rainfed crops is about 11.4 M ha-m (114.02 billion cubic meters, BCM) from about 28.6 M ha that could be considered for water harvesting. Among individual crops, rain-fed rice contributes a higher surplus followed by soybeans. Deficit of rainfall for meeting crop water requirements is also visible for crops like groundnut, cotton, chickpeas and pigeon pea.Based on this available surplus, the irrigable area was estimated for a single supplemental irrigation of 100 mm (including conveyance/ application and evaporation losses) at the reproductive stage of the crop both for normal and drought years. Runoff during drought years is assumed to be 50 % of runoff surplus during normal rainfall years (based on authors' estimates for selected districts and rain-fed crops). However, farmers tend to use the water more prudently during drought years and save larger cropped areas. The potential irrigable area through supplementary irrigation for both scenarios is given in Table 5. Out of 114 billion cubic meters water available as surplus, about 28 billion cubic meters (19.4 %) is needed for providing supplemental irrigation to irrigate an area of 25 million ha during the normal monsoon year, thus leaving about 86 M ha-m (80.6 %) to meet river/environmental flow and other requirements. During drought years also about 31 billion cubic meters of water is still available even after making provision for irrigating 20.6 million ha. Thus it can be seen that water harvesting and supplemental irrigation do not jeopardize the available flows in rivers even during drought years or cause significant downstream effects in the identified areas. Water use efficiency under rain-fed agriculture is not a consistent value as evidenced in irrigated agriculture. In rain-fed areas, the water use efficiency (WUE) varies from district to district and from year to year based on the pattern of rainfall occurrence with drought years giving a higher value of water use efficiency. The present study aggregates water use efficiency at the district level for major rain-fed crops. Production projections were made for different crops in the respective rain-fed districts using the information on regional rainwater use efficiency, both for 'business as usual' scenario (only application of supplementary irrigation) and under 'improved practices' scenario (limited follow-up on recommended package of practices). Additional production (Table 6) was a product of irrigable area (Table 5), regional rainwater use efficiency and the amount of supplemental irrigation. The irrigable area through supplemental irrigation for different crops during the drought season varies between 50-98 % (98 % for rice crop to 50 % for sunflower growing districts) of the irrigable area during the normal (non-drought) season. Under improved management practices, an average of 50 % increase in total production cutting across drought and normal seasons is realizable with supplemental irrigation from a rain-fed area of 27.5 M ha. Production enhancement in the drought season in case of rice crop is high due to higher water application efficiency and also due to sufficient surplus of to bring almost the entire rice cultivated area under supplemental irrigation. This would also indicate that large tracts of rain-fed rice cultivated area are covered under high rainfall zones with sufficient surplus for rainwater harvesting. Significant production improvements can be realized in rice, sorghum, maize, cotton, sesame, soybeans and chickpeas.The success of the 'Green Revolution' in irrigated areas is one solid example built upon irrigation and improved technologies. Every one of the stakeholders from supplier to farmer to market responded with equal enthusiasm. A second 'Green Revolution' is not in the offing for long time for the reason that this needs to be staged on a water-scarcity/insufficiency zone. Supplemental irrigation has substantive potential for increasing production from rain-fed crops across different districts, yet its adoption on a large scale shall depend upon its economic worthiness. Numerous such structures have been built under varying agro-climatic conditions under state sponsored programs, by nongovernmental organizations and with individual initiatives. The available literature has good evidence on the technical and financial viability of construction of such water harvesting structures for, improvement of water productivity and diversification of agriculture in rain-fed areas (Singh 1986;Oweiss 1997).The cost of provision of supplemental irrigation through construction of water harvesting structures varies a great deal between different states/ regions and locations, and within the same state (Samra 2007; personal communication; Table 7). Hence, a simple analysis based on the national average cost for rainwater harvesting structures (INR 18,500/ ha) was carried out for the provision of supplemental irrigation to the rain-fed crops. In the calculation of annualized cost, rate of interest as well as depreciation cost for the structures has been deducted. An assumption was made that rainwater harvested would be utilized for the existing crop only, and accordingly returns were considered for the existing crop only. However, in actual practice the farmer makes much better use of the created water resource by planting high-value crops and plantations and investments in livestock and aquaculture. The annualized cost for each crop and gross and net benefits with supplemental irrigation to each crop are shown under Table 8. It suggests that an estimated INR 50 billion annually is required to provide supplemental irrigation to around 28 M ha of rain-fed cultivated land, and half of that amount is required for rice and coarse cereals only. The data suggests that gross and net benefits are quite high for cotton, oilseeds, pulses and rice. However, the coarse cereal group, in general, and pearl millet, in particular, exhibit lower gross and net benefits even with SI and improved practices. This indicates the need for better varieties of these crops, which are more responsive to irrigation and nutrition. In spite of the rain-fed lands having the highest unexploited potential for growth, the risk of crop failures, low yields and the insecurity of livelihoods are high due to the random behavior of the rainfall. Rain-fed agriculture is mainly and negatively influenced by intermittent dry spells during the cropping season and, especially at critical growth stages coinciding with the terminal growth stage. District level analysis for different rain-fed crops in India showed that the difference in the district average yields for rain-fed crops among different rainfall zones was not very high, indicating that the total water availability may not be the major problem in different rainfall zones; and that for each crop there were few dominant districts, which contributed most to the total rain-fed crop production. A good strategy to realize the potential of rain-fed agriculture in India (and elsewhere) appears to be, to harvest a small part of available surplus runoff and reutilize it for supplemental irrigation at different critical crop growth stages.The study identified about 27.5 M ha of potential rain-fed area, which accounted for most of the rain-fed production and generated sufficient runoff (114 BCM) for harvesting and reutilization. It was possible to raise the rain-fed production by 50 % over this entire area through the application of a single supplementary irrigation (28 BCM) and some follow up on the improved practices. Extensive area coverage rather than intensive irrigation need to be followed in regions with higher than 750 mm/ annum rainfall, since there is a larger possibility of alleviating the in-season drought spells and ensuring a second crop with limited water application. This component may be made an integral component of the ongoing and new development schemes in the identified rural districts. The proposed strategy is environmentally benign, equitable, poverty-targeted and financially attractive to realize the untapped potential of rain-fed agriculture in India."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2251797098.json b/main/part_2/2251797098.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..109d16f6a1163fa0cecef537b65b7cf4a22a8db7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2251797098.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ac6ad601443ffda6d45f4973e4ed6a02","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e166e8a0-5676-4275-8faf-92f30e3659cd/retrieve","id":"-486682843"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"eb517754-7f5e-49fb-b978-36e40c968355","content":"From a total of 571 submissions from 78 countries worldwide, 22 innovation teams with pioneering solutions to Uzbekistan's agricultural challenges rose to the top through a comprehensive review process. After an intensive 3-day bootcamp offering workshops, mentorship, plenary sessions, and opportunities to engage with like-minded innovators, a final 11 were admitted onto a fully sponsored acceleration program. The final phase of the Innovation Challenge will then see 3 teams with proven sustainable business models and scaling plans be awarded up to 30,000 USD in equity-free grant, post-acceleration support to accelerate go-to-market and growth, and on-the ground experimentation of their solutions with farmers.This booklet shines a worthy light on the 22 ambitious teams.Project LeaderBiochar by Ecobiome is a naturally occurring, carbon-rich soil additive that has the potential to improve soil fertility and increase crop yields by lowering the demand for synthetic fertilizers. Our mission at Ecobiome is to be the industry leader in sustainable agriculture by developing cutting-edge biochar products that are essential for improving soil health, capturing carbon, and eventually reducing climate change. Meet Machine Learning Lab Xasanboy Xakimov Team MemberOybek Eraliev Team LeadMagicSoft's application of drones in plant disease assessment offers efficient monitoring and detection capabilities for smart agriculture. Drones provide increased accessibility, improved coverage, and rapid data collection, enabling timely disease detection.Mironshokh Asadov Backend and ML DeveloperTeam LeadManhat is a deep technology startup based in the United Arab Emirates; focusing on \"natural water distillation\" patented technology for sustainable water and floating farm solutions.MethaGone is developing a probiotic feed additive emulating the methane mitigation strategy of red seaweed. As MethaGone, we aim to reduce methane emissions of cows by up to 98% while also displaying a similar performance to common weight gainer products. Contrary to the red seaweed alternatives, MethaGone is non-toxic, more scalable, and palatable for cows.Roy Erzurumluoğlu Head of Business Development mistEO is a realtime takaful parametric insurance platform for agriculture powered by weather analytics, satellite based monitoring, intervention advisories and smart contract based claim settlement.Piatrika is building an AI-driven platform that helps researchers and seed companies to more sustainable seeds and agri chemicals to market faster and cheaper. We are doing this by creating a new innovative enterprise cloud PAAS for genomic discoveries and plant breeding decision support, programme design and monitoring.Co-FounderSoiLens is an app for high-resolution soil information with spatial visualisation nutrient heterogeneity at quantitative scale. The user can access precise, expert-level and site-specific recommendation on fertilisation strategy and timing.Message Akunna Software DeveloperTerra Bank is a game-changing innovation that bridges the lending gap for farmers. By harnessing advanced sensors and machine learning, the system generates accurate credit scores for farms, empowering banks to offer favorable loans. Farmers' financing struggles are addressed as this technology analyzes extensive farm data, which traditional credit departments overlook.Ravshan Jumanazarov Data AnalystTezExport is an aggregator platform that brings together the of manufacturers, suppliers and wholesale buyers of agricultural products. TezExport provides a service for processing and delivering bulk orders at the regional level.Bekzod Usarov Mobile DeveloperInnovation Challenge Weavair offers a digital twin model powered by satellite hyperspectral imagery, drone imagery and sensors, which enables better land use and crop rotation planning and reduces the cost and time required make accurate decisions by at least 10-fold, resulting in ROI of less than 2 years. It helps improve resilience to climate events, and improves water and energy efficiency, while also creating new revenue opportunities through the sale of carbon offsets. By streamlining the regulation compliance & certification, the solution also enables access to new investment and foreign financing opportunities.Natalia Mykhaylova CEOInnovation Challenge Zero Earth Company is a buy now pay later (BNPL) farmer financing platform to implement environmentally economically and socially sustainable dairy models which increases farmer revenue up to 10 times and reduces emissions up to 50 percent.Co-FounderContact info@agritechchallenge.org"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2255866948.json b/main/part_2/2255866948.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8438f94db1b43d5925567b4169eaf374f5448b29 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2255866948.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"174d764be5a93c866624d629b5f17690","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7dfba1bb-c9f1-4834-b80c-448f6c7f932e/retrieve","id":"-901671372"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6a59810b-d2b5-4701-8602-fd40ef22493a","content":"Africa RISING is testing alternative technology options with heterogeneous populations of farmers that will likely respond to the technologies differently. Creating farm typologies is one approach to design targeted interventions that adequately address the needs of different types of farmers. Notably, creating typologies can help: Identify suitable farms to target innovations (ex-ante): we assume that not all innovations are appropriate for all farms, and that structuring into groups would support the identification of technology-specific suitable farming systems.  Scale out innovations: on the basis of the heterogeneity in a population we can formulate extension messages, policies and other incentive schemes to further spread the use of designed innovations.  Assess agro-economic effects (ex-post) Explaining trends and farmer 'behavior' (functional characteristics, including sustainable intensification indicators) and verification of the agro-economic effects of the interventions for different farm types.This document presents a summary of a typology study done using quantitative statistical methods (discussed below) applied to micro data from the Ethiopia Africa RISING Baseline Evaluation Survey (EARBES) (conducted in 2014) and secondary data on environmental/biophysical variables from various source. The quantitative approaches have the advantage that they are reproducible and do not impose any ex-ante structure to the clustering process, while more qualitative approaches can potentially incorporate less tangible insights such as cultural patterns. Once the different farm types are identified through systematic quantitative analysis, they need to be validated with input from Africa RISING colleagues (especially working in Ethiopia).We apply a combination of factor and cluster analysis to obtain the final groups, or \"types\" (See Cunningham & Maloney, 1999 for an empirical application). We first use factor analysis to reduce the number of socio-economic variables to characterize the farms by selecting the most relevant ones in differentiating the sample. Factor analysis is often used to discover underlying patterns in data and its aim is to explain the largest portion of the entire dataset variation with the lowest possible number of factors. Factors are unobserved variables that summarize the correlation among several observed variables and factor analysis allows us to divide the dataset into different factors, or dimensions, and categorize each variable into one of the factors. Figure 1 shows an example of how the variables in a dataset are divided into different dimensions to explain the total variation in the data. The analysis also allows us to rank the factors by their importance in explaining the variation in the data and to further rank each variable by its explanatory power within the factor. Our factor analysis based on EARBES data involves the following main steps (see for example McDonald;2014. Basilevsky;2009. Mulaik;2009 for a discussion on the methods):1. We divide the variables in EARBES into the five domains of sustainability that have been identified within Africa RISING to gauge progress: productivity, economic, environment, social and human. 2. We perform separate factor analysis on each domain to select the variables that explain the largest portion of the variation in the data. 3. We use scree plots to define the number of factors to look at and, within each of the selected factors, we consider the two variables with the highest absolute values of factor loads, conditional on them being greater than 0.5 (or smaller than -0.5). 4. Finally, we obtain a parsimonious set of socio-economic variables that explain most of the variation in the data and thus are highly relevant in defining the different farm types.The sub-set of variables obtained using steps (1) to (4) are used to perform a cluster analysis, which divides the total sample into a chosen number of clusters (Kaufman & Rousseeuw;2009. Romesburg;2004. Galbraith et Al.;2002). The numbers of clusters are chosen in order to represent groups that are different enough from each other while ensuring that each group to be included has a sufficient amount of observations. There are several different methods to perform cluster analysis, some hierarchical and some non-hierarchical. We chose the hierarchical method using medians, where the distance between two clusters is calculated as the median distance between all pairs of subjects in the two clusters. The results obtained and the characteristics of each group formed are reported in the next section.The scree plot of the factorization of the productivity variables (Figure 2) shows that the first four factors (represented by the first four dots at the top of the line graph) are highly relevant but starting from the 5 th factor they start to be less important in explaining the variation (smaller vertical jump).Table 1 shows the rotated matrix of factor loads for the four factors we have chosen, with the relevant variables highlighted (>0.5 or <-0.5). Factor 1 captures elements related to legumes production and number of cultivated plots. Factor 2 captures total land size, production of cereals and breeding of big ruminants. Factor 3 captures intercropping practices and, finally, Factor 4 captures diversity of livestock ownership and poultry TLU. The final selection of variables for the cluster analysis includes the area cultivated with legumes and Kg of legumes' production for factor 1, land size and Kg of cereals' production for factor 2, the share of households practicing intercropping and the average number of intercropped plots for factor 3, and finally the share of households breeding mixed livestock and the number of livestock types possessed for factor 4. For the economic variables we considered, the relevant factors seem to be the first three (Figure 3). Table 2 shows that factor 1 captures total harvest and its uses; while factor 2 captures agricultural non-labor inputs; and factor 3 captures labor inputs. Dwelling conditions and the wealth indices does not play a significant role in differentiating the sample. The final list of variables considered includes total harvest of grains and Kg of harvest used for other reasons (factor 1), pesticide and fertilizer costs (factor 2), and total and male person days used in agriculture (factor 3). For the environment domain, we identified four relevant factors. The first concerns the characteristics of the soil, the second captures fallowing and the issues related to soil erosion, the third includes crop rotation and the use of manure, and the fourth includes irrigation practices and the use of urea. Our dataset has a relatively small set of variables capturing social aspects, focusing on gender disparities. We thus chose only the first factor, which highlights the presence of females-only managed plots and livestock as the main variables of interest. Females also responsible for plots 0.5138Females only responsible for plots 0.9093Females also responsible for livestock -0.0902Females only responsible for livestock 0.6769The final sustainability domain we focus on is human capital. We select the first four factors, which capture the age composition of household members (factor 1) the head's years of education, mean age in the household, total dependency ratio and food insecurity level (factor 2), the main characteristics of the household head (factor 3) and the level of education in the household (factor 4). We finally select old dependency ratio and share of members between 0 and 14 years old (factor 1), number of males adults and mean adult's age in the household (factor 2), whether the household head is married or widow (factor 3), and whether the head is literate and maximum years of education in the household. The analysis summarized in the preceding section informed the selection of a list of factors that we used in the cluster analysis. These are 8 productivity variables, 6 economic variables, 8 environmental variables, 2 social variables and 8 human variables. Figure 7 shows the dendrogram illustrating how the farm households in our sample can be split into different groups (or types) based on these variables we have identified. The vertical distance between separations illustrates the distance of the different groups to each other.Considering the number of observations within each group and differentiation of characteristics between groups, we decided to create three final groups, or \"types\" of farmers. Tables 6a to 6e illustrate the distribution of characteristics across these types and sustainability domains discussed before. Because the clusters were defined using the variables accounting for most of the data variation, as captured by the factor analysis, most of the characteristics differ significantly across every type. Type 1 includes 188 of the farmers in the sample. Type 2 is the biggest one and defines 229 farmers. Finally, type 3 is the smallest, with 67 farmers.Dendrogram cluster analysis  Small female headed households with lower levels of education and high food insecurity.  Generally low levels of gender equality.  Small landholdings and little livestock owned.  Little use of labor and non-labor inputs.  Low levels of endowments and large portions of harvest going to own consumption.  Some issues with soil erosion.Type 2: Legumes growers with mid-levels of endowments  Average levels of gender equality but wage gap in favor of women.  Small landholdings but wide variety of livestock bred, often including poultry.  Legumes growers with high legumes yields.  Frequent employment of hired and communal labor.  Mid-levels of endowments.  Relatively frequent use of soil conservation practices but problems with soil erosion.Type 3: Highly endowed households breeding large ruminants  Large households with many children and high levels of education. High levels of food security.  High gender equality in terms of responsibilities but severe wage gap. Large landholdings and ownership of big ruminants.  High input expenditure, including in improved seeds.  High levels of endowments and good dwelling conditions. High commercialization of the harvest.  Relatively little use of soil conservation practices and very severe problems of soil incrustation.Table 7 summarizes the main characteristics of every type relative to each sustainability domain, providing a simplified framework for classifying farm households into a particular type. Figure 9 shows a graphic representation of the main characteristics of each type. The typologies are heterogeneously distributed across space, as shown in figure 10. While in the SNNPR region and especially in Amhara there is a high concentration of households with low to medium levels of endowments (type 1 and 2), The Oromia region concentrates high shares of the highly endowed households (type 3). The spatial distinctions are important because they can support interventions based on the most prevalent households' typologies in the area.The characteristics of each household type described above can be displayed clearly with a spider plot. Figure 11 summarizes the performance of each type relative by each domain as follows: Type 3 largely dominates in every aspect, but in the environment domain he's closer to the other two types.  Type 1 and type 2 have similar performances in the social and environmental domains but type 2 is better endowed in terms of productive, economic and human assets. Large efforts have to be made to improve the productive capacity and the economic resources available to group 1. This could be made through granting better access to superior agricultural technologies and trainings on how to use them to increase yields and livestock production. Better access to education can also contribute to improve their human endowments and may foster better gender inclusion.  Africa RISING can focus on fostering the gender inclusiveness in group 2.  Group 3 is performing very well across the five SI domains and could therefore be involved by the AR implementers to show the good example to the neighboring farmers.  The three groups present severe problems of soil erosion and incrustation, therefore they would all benefits from interventions aiming at improving the quality of the soil. The appendix includes additional graphs characterizing the obtained typologies. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2264967606.json b/main/part_2/2264967606.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9c747066a056e9df1109a712e2ce0e410530930 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2264967606.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c624ae7f3ba8674aea2b6425e463da0c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4a5974fa-64fc-4752-8e08-68222c5e6292/retrieve","id":"377503950"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e71f6d76-d233-469e-a135-a67be3e16035","content":"Under its new research for development (R4D) initiative on digital innovation and transformation, the Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research (CGIAR), organised a two-day workshop on 8 and 9 November 2022, at Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.The workshop was aimed to better understand the actor landscape of the digital ecosystem in food-water-land systems. This includes: the availability, accessibility, gender responsiveness and effectiveness of services; the challenges and opportunities in promoting an inclusive, gender-intentional and beneficial digital ecosystem; and the data management challenges associated with data security and governance. Essential stakeholders encompassing representatives from government, research, private, producer and Non-Governmental Organizations having expertise and experience in digital innovations participated in the workshop (refer to list of participants in Annexure 1).The purpose of this consultation was to understand the actor landscape in the digital foodwater-land ecosystem, the services they provide, gender-responsiveness of these services, the challenges and opportunities in promoting an inclusive, gender-intentional and beneficial digital ecosystem, and the data management challenges associated with data security and governance. A rapid assessment of the capacity needs of the digital ecosystem actors to address the gender digital divide in their respective domains will also be conducted. The specific objectives of the consultation workshop included: In this introductory session, Dr Jawoo Koo (IFPRI), Dr Hom Gartaula (CIMMYT), and Dr Andrea Gardeazabal Monsalve (CIMMYT) -all from One CGIAR -set the tone for the workshop with an overview of the One CGIAR Digital Innovations Initiative. They briefly described the potential of the digital innovations to transform the agri-food systems in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs), the prevalence or persistence of the digital divide within geographies, communities and within households, and the challenges that need to be overcome for bridging the digital divide.The five major work packages (WPs) of the digital innovations initiative include: an enabling environment, digital inclusion, systems modelling, real-time monitoring, and platforms and services (Figure 1). These were all discussed. Dr Jawoo Koo stressed on the importance of co-ordinated activities across these five WPs to deliver a suite of outputs through three pathways (policy, innovation, and capacity building) to support three levels (decisionmakers, service providers, and users).The expected outcomes from the One CGIAR digital innovations initiative were also discussed as follows:• Informed policymakers and investors formulate enabling policies for locally-led digital ecosystems, develop digital strategies, establish public-private partnerships, and attract strategic investments toward bridging the digital divide;• Improved digital services and information systems provide more timely, accurate, and actionable information that helps agri-food system actors manage climate and food security risks; and• Empowered women and youth use digital technologies, leading to improved livelihoods and job opportunities.Thereafter, Dr Gartaula elaborated on the topic of gender digital divide in India. He briefly explained the barriers to women's participation in digitized agri-food value chains, such as, social norms, lack of access and control over resources, and lack of digital inclusion. He also described the immediate and long-term opportunities for inclusive digital innovations, by forging partnership with non-traditional actors (women, youth and marginal communities).For all the subsequent sessions participants were divided into groups, for more discussions on these topics where the participants could share their insights, opinions and expertise.The major aspects discussed during the breakout sessions included the existing digital infrastructure in agri-food systems; the key actors involved, the types of services provided by these actors; and mode of service delivery. The digital ecosystem is huge and there is a need to investigate micro ecosystems so as to facilitate mapping.The existing infrastructure includes mobile-based apps, Web-based Apps, Internet of Things (IoTs), MIS, GIS modelling, Geo tagging, etc., to name a few. Though digital infrastructure exists, it is inadequate, especially in the rural areas due to poor connectivity (bandwidth) and low accessibility to mobile devices among and within rural households. There are multiple actors, providing different digital innovative services, using multiple service delivery methods.The major actors include government institutions (Central, State and Regional), private sector stakeholders, NGOs, research organizations, farmers, entrepreneurs, Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs), Self-Help Groups (SHGs), financial institutions, knowledge intermediaries, etc. The major services being provided include crop advisory and information services, supply chain management services, market information, market linkage, facilitation services, financial inclusion, weather advisory, technical services (software development, web management), etc.The main mode of service delivery is through mobile phones (WhatsApp, SMS, IVR), Internet of Things, etc., mostly facilitated by human intermediaries such as extension agents, staff of Common Service centres (CSCs), staff/members of the Agricultural Production Committees/Clusters (APCs), SHGs, FPOs, Village Champions and Village Youth.Opportunities and challenges in promoting inclusive, gender-intentional and beneficial digital ecosystem were discussed during this session. One of the major challenges cited by the participants is lack of availability of sex disaggregated data, even with respect to ownership and usage of digital tools (such as mobile phones), while designing digital solutions. Some actors opined that gender is not well-defined even from the government perspective, for instance in the census data itself gender is not given due weightage.Another crucial challenge identified is the lack of capacity to assess the needs of women and other marginalized and vulnerable groups.Digital services are designed and delivered mostly in a supply driven (PUSH) and top-down approach. The contents pushed through these services are mostly not need based and are not context specific. Gender and social inclusion is an afterthought once the digital service has been designed and deployed. Need assessment, along with community engagement, during the process of designing digital innovations is an important aspect to be considered before deploying digital services. Technical service providers view gender inclusion as a lesser challenge in the project design phase itself even if the gender component is included, but most of the institutes do not investigate this aspect in the project design phase. Some participants opined that currently accessibility is not a problem but the hitch is lack of need-based digital services. Affordability, information gap, and lack of incentives are some of the other challenges identified by the participants. Some of the participants felt that these services would be more used if they were bundled with enhanced market access, and also enabled sale of surplus produce, supported farmers in obtaining better rates for their produce, etc. They also felt that there is a huge opportunity for digital service penetration through mobilisation of women into groups. Digital innovations have wide scope in facilitating access to credit and empowering women and other marginalised groups, financially as well as socially. Other major opportunities for making digital innovations inclusive and gender intentional are bundling up services, using a combination of technologies, delivering services with human facilitation and integrating the gender Mostly data is enumerated in the field by agencies, agents, village resource persons or village level champions and local youth, who are given orientation and trained prior to data collection. There was a consensus among the participants that gender disaggregated data is not collected, unless specified in the project design and linked to a mandate.The unanimously identified challenge is lack of quality in the data as well as access to it.Often, the inherent gender bias of the enumerators or data collectors, despite training and orientation, raises questions on the credibility of the primary data and thereby as a source of secondary data as well. Also, data collection is done at various levels, such as at individual level, household level, village level, field level, community level, as well as national and subnational levels. This brings to mind the issue of non-standardized data. The data quality itself is intersectional as observed by various participants; for example, data quality significantly varies between men and women or between castes or classes. Participants agreed that there is need for data sharing between stakeholders. However, there are existing gaps in practice not only due to lack of trust between various stakeholders, but also due to lack of knowledge on who has what type of data. Access to data in a scenario where multiple stakeholders are involved in a single initiative is problematic and at times the data from stakeholders at various levels don't match. Also, sometimes, the field level data and the reported data have wide gaps, such as beneficiaries listed under different schemes. This creates data silos that prevent stakeholders from coming together and sharing data that could have been pooled across multiple actors and platforms. All these forces different stakeholders from various sectors to start from scratch while working on digital initiatives, although data is available in the digital ecosystem. Mechanisms to facilitate data sharing are needed to operationalize the format in which the data is stored to make it compatible to the needs and capacities of all the relevant stakeholders.Lack of a strong privacy policy in the digital apps developed was also identified as a major hindrance to going forward in an increasingly digital era. It is exacerbated by the fact that most of the apps have privacy policies in English rather than in the native/vernacular language spoken by the farmers. Lack of capacity to manage and analyse the big data produced in the digital ecosystem is another challenge pointed out by the participants.There is a wide gap in making use of this data that already exists, which can be seen as legacy data, to formulate further effective strategies for digital innovations. Some of the measures to address these challenges as shared by the participants are creation of a common dashboard or interface for accessing and sharing the data with an option to question the data as well, so that need-specific data can be accessed and matters of interoperability can also be solved. There is a need to set up a convergence platform because ultimately various stakeholders with similar service models reach farmers with the same queries, but for different platforms, challenging the availability of systematic and organized data. Ethical practices should be adhered to, such as agreements between the various stakeholders including farmers, while sharing the data so as to build trust between stakeholders as well as for data security.Participants believe that government institutions are still hesitant to share data. If the data is opened up for analysis, more customized and relevant digital services can be delivered. Some of the strategies to solve challenges related to data privacy, as discussed, are storing data in password protected websites, coding of primary data, masking data partially, having data privacy policy and user level agreements (ULA), accessing and storing data through sensors. Engaging third party evaluators (external agency, research institutes) to assess data quality and impact of the project is another strategy that is being already practiced by some stakeholders.In this session, aspects related to current patterns of collaboration in digital service delivery, the types of partnerships that are needed for promoting digitally inclusive innovation and the existing capacity needs and gaps to enable gender-responsive and inclusive digital innovations were discussed. All the participants acknowledged that partnerships with multiple stakeholders are crucial for providing innovative digital solutions. There is general agreement that most of the digital initiatives are project based, and therefore further scaling up calls for much support from government, especially for a strong partnership. This was further validated by quoting the success of Jeevika Project from Bihar. Partnerships are done mainly for knowledge sharing (research organizations), technical capacity building (private sector, NGOs), data collection (NGOs), service delivery (NGOs, private sector, government organizations), feedback and impact assessment (NGOs, private sector, research organizations), evidence building (research organizations), handholding/service expansion (government sector). Other interesting aspects discussed were the need for partnerships to have a shared vision, flexible/adaptive framework, strong governance as well as facilitators, such as innovation brokers, so that it is sustainable, scalable and cross learning can take place. Actor landscape mapping is another measure that can expedite partnerships as advocated by some other stakeholders.The main points to address the capacity gaps and enable gender-responsive digital innovations are discussed now. Gender is mostly an afterthought in most initiatives.Internalizing the concept of gender and harmonising efforts while focussing on the gender dimension is crucial but, it is also a challenge as observed by the stakeholders. There is still a lack of awareness on why gender matters in agriculture and agricultural projects. Hence, there is a need to sensitise multiple stakeholders (individuals and also at the organisational level) on bringing gender inclusion within the ambits of the digital projects and programmes they are involved with. To start with, digital initiatives should have a clear intention to be gender inclusive and have identified action points/nodes for acting on it. To enable this whole process there must be a continuous effort on capacity development at all levels through a gender lens. Generally, digital tools do not have a women centric design, and for this, trans-disciplinary partnerships need to be nurtured in the developmental phase. The importance of having a gender focal point wherein gender inclusiveness is ensured and incentivized was also discussed. Some of the stakeholders shared good practices, such as identifying gender champions in a group who will act as influencers and ensure gender inclusiveness. Another good practice championed was to include women and other marginalised groups while pilot testing digital innovations so as to ensure a gender inclusive design and promote gender conscious scaling. Some also felt that collecting evidence from gender inclusive practices and sharing it with stakeholders could also be one of the strategies for promoting gender inclusion across a wider expanse of stakeholders. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2271586660.json b/main/part_2/2271586660.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6918b68179bbb22b041764d3436df5dfc403a140 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2271586660.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ee2e6e54d8702cc1c0922756aba6530e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3dd9108c-8f63-4ee3-8262-b107d51220fc/retrieve","id":"1945528878"},"keywords":["climate smart agriculture","resilience","carbon balance","cocoa","mitigation","Ghana","Ex-ACT","agroforestry"],"sieverID":"fb2d897a-396c-4c86-a69d-ded9429643b9","content":"Agriculture in Africa is not only exposed to climate change impacts but is also a source of greenhouse gases (GHGs). While GHG emissions in Africa are relatively minimal in global dimensions, agriculture in the continent constitutes a major source of GHG emissions. In Ghana, agricultural emissions are accelerating, mainly due to ensuing deforestation of which smallholder cocoa farming is largely associated. The sector is also bedevilled by soil degradation, pests, diseases and poor yields coupled with poor agronomic practices. Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) thus offers a way to reduce the sector's GHG emissions and to adapt the sector to the adverse impacts of climate change. This study assesses the potential of CSA vis-à-vis conventional cocoa systems to enhance production, mitigate and/or remove GHG emissions and build resilience, in addition to understanding key determinants influencing CSA practices. Using a mixed methods approach, data was collected in Ghana's Juabeso and Atwima Mponua districts through semi-structured household questionnaires administered to 80 household heads of cocoa farms, two focus group discussions and expert interviews. A farm budget analysis of productivity and economic performance for both scenarios show that CSA practitioners had a 29% higher income per ha compared to the conventional farmers. Estimations using the FAO Ex-Ante Carbon-Balance Tool (EX-ACT) indicate CSA practices preserve forest resources without which the effect on carbon balance as presented by conventional farming would remain a source of GHG emissions. Farm tenure, age of farmers, location of farm, residential status and access to extension services were the main determining factors influencing CSA practices among cocoa farmers. An in-depth understanding of these indicators can help identify ways to strengthen CSA strategies in the cocoa sector and their contributions to climate change mitigation and resilience.Agriculture is the primary source of livelihood in many African countries, employing more than 60% of the population and often the largest contributor to Gross Domestic Product [1,2].Yet the sector faces various challenges including market system failures and trade barriers, unstable and ineffective socio-economic policies, poor information, infrastructural and financial Land 2018, 7, 30 3 of 21 maintain or enhance cocoa production, reduce and/or remove GHG emissions and build resilience. Further, we aim to identify and analyse the factors that influence CSA practices from the individual and household as well as the institutional and policy perspectives. We therefore seek to answer the following questions: What is the level of increase in productivity, farm income and GHG balance due to CSA practices compared to conventional cocoa production? What factors influence CSA practices in cocoa farming systems in Ghana?The cocoa landscapes of Juabeso and Atwima Mponua districts in the Western and Ashanti regions respectively (Figure 1) were selected for this study. These sites were considered suitable primarily because of the predominance of smallholder cocoa farming households, engaging in either 'business-as-usual' or improved cocoa farming systems based on scientific recommendations. The area also embodies successful implementation of major voluntary standards and certification schemes in Ghana including Rainforest Alliance (RA) and UTZ certified (an abbreviation for \"Utz Kapeh\": 'Good Coffee' in the Mayan Quiché language; global certification program for sustainable coffee, cocoa and tea production) [24]. While conventional farming systems are common in each district, the presence of the Rainforest Alliance certified Climate Cocoa Project in Juabeso and Organic Cocoa Project in the Atwima Mponua Districts represent essential classifications that allowed the study to explore and compare different dimensions to adoption and practices of CSA, as well as determinant factors in different locations.Land 2018, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 21 climate-smart cocoa practices. Thus, we aim to analyse the potential of cocoa farming systems to maintain or enhance cocoa production, reduce and/or remove GHG emissions and build resilience. Further, we aim to identify and analyse the factors that influence CSA practices from the individual and household as well as the institutional and policy perspectives. We therefore seek to answer the following questions: What is the level of increase in productivity, farm income and GHG balance due to CSA practices compared to conventional cocoa production? What factors influence CSA practices in cocoa farming systems in Ghana?The cocoa landscapes of Juabeso and Atwima Mponua districts in the Western and Ashanti regions respectively (Figure 1) were selected for this study. These sites were considered suitable primarily because of the predominance of smallholder cocoa farming households, engaging in either 'business-as-usual' or improved cocoa farming systems based on scientific recommendations. The area also embodies successful implementation of major voluntary standards and certification schemes in Ghana including Rainforest Alliance (RA) and UTZ certified (an abbreviation for \"Utz Kapeh\": 'Good Coffee' in the Mayan Quiché language; global certification program for sustainable coffee, cocoa and tea production) [24]. While conventional farming systems are common in each district, the presence of the Rainforest Alliance certified Climate Cocoa Project in Juabeso and Organic Cocoa Project in the Atwima Mponua Districts represent essential classifications that allowed the study to explore and compare different dimensions to adoption and practices of CSA, as well as determinant factors in different locations. ). The Juabeso district is in the Western Region of Ghana while the Atwima Mponua district is located in the Ashanti Region. The characteristics of both regions are displayed in Table 1. Relative Humidity 70-90% 75% (Average) [28] Vegetation Moist semi-deciduous Forests Moist semi-deciduous Forests [9,28] Population (Density) 58,435 (42.7) 119,180 (63.0) [26,27] Population Growth Rate 3.5% per annum 3.6% per annum [9,24] Gender (Sex Ratio) Male (50.9%); Female (49.1%) Male (51.3%); Female (48.7%) [26,27] Main Economic Activity Agriculture (engaged in by 76% of economically active population) Agriculture (engaged in by 66% of economically active population) [25,26] Forest Reserves Krokosua Hills; Bia National Park Asenanyo; Tano Ofin [9,25] Source: Authors' (2017).The study area is composed of a rural population of which growth rates reflect high immigration mainly by migrant cocoa farmers who are estimated to own about 70% of cocoa farms in the districts [9,24]. The Juabeso district is host to the Krokosua Hills forest reserve, which is one of the remaining forest patches surrounded by vast areas of low or no shade cocoa farms with negative implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services [9]. Similarly, encroachment also threatens the forest reserves in Atwima Mponua district, which cover over half of the land area making it one of the biggest forest reserves in Ghana [30].Recognised as very productive, Juabeso district is a hub of recent cocoa expansion, illegal logging and associated encroachment into protected areas [9,29]. Bush fires are frequent in the dry seasons resulting from the activities of farmers practicing slash and burn, as well as from hunting and palm wine tapping activities [25]. With annual deforestation rate of 2.2% compared to a 2% per annum national rate, land, forest, wildlife and water resources remain under threat of degradation [31].Data for the study was collected using a mixed methods approach. Semi-structured household questionnaires were administered to 80 household heads of cocoa farms to elicit information on household characteristics and farm management in the two study areas. In addition, two Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), each targeting cocoa farmers in the respective districts were conducted to explore perceptions about climate change and cocoa production as well as factors influencing adoption of CSA practices. The FGDs helped to verify and build consensus on conflicting data. Lastly, interviews with selected experts provided further data on the study area. These various sources also served to triangulate collected data.In each study area, two categories of cocoa farmers were identified, namely, farmers practicing conventional models of cultivation and those engaged in CSA/Agroecology as illustrated in Table 2 below. CSA/Agroecology farming systems were selected from the cocoa certification projects by the RA or AgroEco Louis Bolk Institute. Following this stratification, 20 farmers were selected under each of the categories in each location of the study. Four communities were randomly selected in each location. These included Anasu, Pasoro, Gyereso and Wurubegu in the Atwima Mponua District and Cashiekrom, Komeamaa, Breman and Addaekrom in the Juabeso district, from which five respondents under each stratum of conventional and CSA/Agroecology farming categories were respectively selected. Asare (2014) outlines the following justification by experts and practitioners for recommended CSA/Agroecology practices over conventional practices: During land preparation, leaving cleared weeds to mulch increases soil organic carbon via decomposition and improves soil fertility, avoiding emissions associated with burning in the context of conventional practices. Planting hybrid seedlings increases yield as well as disease resistance, while applying recommended fertilizer regime not only significantly increases yield but also increases root and shoot growth of cocoa causing enhancement of soil carbon stocks. Applying pesticides four times per year, if needed, helps control black pod, other fungal diseases and pests affecting cocoa. Grafting, lining and pegging seedlings at a three square meter spacing reduces intra cocoa competition associated with planting at stake and enhances yield. Allowing natural regeneration and planting shade trees lead to modest carbon sequestration, while planting cocoa under forest-tree or shade produces no emissions from clearing. Weeding regimes reduce competition for soil nutrients, enhances carbon sequestration from cocoa and shade growth. Pruning practices improve cocoa growth and reduces incidence of pest and diseases thereby ensuring healthy cocoa and greater resilience. Cocoa intensification as production strategy ensures higher resource efficiency, climate adaptation and mitigation co-benefits in contrast to extensive practices.One community representing each study district was selected for a Focus Group Discussion. Anansu and Komeamaa communities were selected in Atwima Mponua and Juabeso districts respectively. In each case, the groups were limited to a randomly selected sample of 10 participants to enable effective facilitation.We interviewed one targeted expert each from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Rainforest Alliance (RA) and Nature Conservation Research Centre (NCRC). These institutions were considered due to their technical know-how on the theme of this paper and also due to convenience and resource constraints.Statistical software (SPSS and STATA) were used to analyse quantitative data on productivity, income and factors framing CSA practices. Qualitative data from focus group discussions and expert interviews were analysed using content analysis. The FAO Ex-Ante Carbon Balance Tool (EX-ACT) was used to estimate climate change mitigation potentials of the two farming systems.A farm budget analysis was carried out for both conventional and CSA/Agroecology farming categories. This was to assess respective levels of productivity in average yield per hectare (ha) and economic performance through average income per hectare expressed in Ghana Cedis per hectare (GHS/ha). To realise this, income indicators such as Gross Output Value and Total Production Cost were calculated and set in the function below.The GOV is defined as the total value of cocoa and associated intercrops harvested per hectare over the 2014/2015 farming season. For the purpose of this study, fixed costs were held as a constant factor and TPCs were therefore limited to total variable costs incurred during the same season consisting of variables such as costs for labour (both hired and permanent), pesticides and herbicides, farm maintenance (pruning, weeding etc.), harvesting (pod plucking and breaking), post-harvest (drying and bagging) and transportation.The FAO Ex-Ante Carbon-Balance Tool (EX-ACT) was used for the estimation of GHGs emission and/or sequestration from farming systems (conventional and CSA/Agroecology). The EX-ACT is a land-based accounting system for measuring the impact of agriculture, forestry and other land use on carbon (C) stocks, stock changes per unit land and methane (CH 4 ) and Nitrogen oxide (N 2 O) emissions expressed in tonnes per hectare of carbon dioxide equivalent (t CO 2 -eq/ha) [32]. The difference between two scenarios; with or without project interventions, which in the study's context is considered as with or without CSA/Agroecology intervention, defines the C balance, which is the main output of the tool.A binomial logistic regression was used to identify factors framing CSA/Agroecology practices among cocoa farmers in the study area. The logistic model was estimated using the following equation: where Y i is the dependent variable measured as a dummy, 1 if farmer practiced CSA/Agroecology, 0 if farmer practiced conventional farming; β 0 is the constant term; β 1 to β 14 represent the coefficients of the explanatory variables; and ε i the error term. In relation to the following a priori expectations as presented in Table 3, the coefficients were estimated using STATA software [33]. Source: Authors' (2017).Qualitative data that was collected in focus group discussions and expert interviews were analysed via content analysis. Voice recordings obtained via these processes were transcribed and manually synthesised to retrieve information to complement the quantitative data.Demographic and socio-economic characteristics considered include age, gender, education, household size, farm tenure, number of farms and size, among others (Table 4). The age of respondents ranged from 24 to 75 years with a mean of 45 and modal age of 40 years, whereas 63% of respondents were male. On average, farming experience (number of years engaged in cocoa farming) was about 18 years. Table 4 shows a similar distribution of farmers with primary education while those with secondary education are more among the CSA/agroecology farmers.The average number of persons per household is 8 persons. About 72% of respondents employ both household and hired labour. Average farm size cultivated is 2.7 ha with conventional farming having the largest farm size (8 ha) in the range. With respect to farm tenure, 69% of the farmers own their farms while 20% managed family farms and 11% operated as share croppers under equal share of proceeds (abunum) agreements. However, 60% of farmers interviewed had access to only one cocoa farm and 29% operated 2 different cocoa farms while 11% operated 3 to 4 cocoa farms. In general, 59% of the respondents were members of farmer organizations but only 23% of conventional farmers belonged to a farmer organization compared to 95% of farmers in CSA/Agroecology with membership in at least one farmer organization. Furthermore, 64% of respondents who had access to extension Further, only 10% and 13% of respective farmers under conventional and CSA/Agroecology categories had access to farm credits, which made up 11% of respondents who obtained access to credit. Despite the government's support with free cocoa fertilizer distribution and free pests and disease control exercises, 71% of respondents claimed no access to farm inputs in the previous (2014/2015) farming season. Only 15% of conventional farmers had access to pesticides and fertilizer compared to 43% CSA/Agroecology farmers. CSA/Agroecology with an overall mean of GHS 715 (US $188). Averages of total production costs (without fixed costs) per hectare for Conventional and CSA/Agroecology practices were GHS 621 (USD 163) and GHS 920 (USD 242) respectively. Labour constituted the largest cost component in both categories representing 42% and 51% of total cost respectively. A total average yield of 432 kg/ha was achieved for the entire study area. Average yield per hectare for the whole study area was 37% higher in CSA/agroecology (500 kg/ha) than in conventional farming (363 kg/ha). We use the difference between CSA/Agroecology and conventional cocoa yields as an indicator of resilience. The performance of CSA/agroecology in Juabeso and Atwima Mponua indicates 50% and 22% improvements in productivity and by extension improvements in resilience compared to respective cases of conventional cocoa. In CSA/Agroecology, yields in both Juabeso and Atwima Mponua were 594 kg/ha and 406 kg/ha respectively. Conventional cocoa yields in Juabeso and Atwima Mponua were 394 kg/ha and 332 kg/ha respectively. Independent sample t-test of yields showed a significant difference between yields from CSA/Agroecology and conventional farming (t(78) = −3933, p = 0.000), with yields from CSA/Agroecology being higher than yields from conventional farming.With reference to the producer price of cocoa as set by Ghana's cocoa governing institution (COCOBOD) for the 2014/2015 farming season of GHS 5.47 (USD 1.4) for 1 kg (Ministry of Finance 2014) and additional 3.5% premium paid for organic cocoa beans, the value of cocoa output per hectare ranged from GHS 1050 (USD 276) to GHS 6394 (USD 1683) with a mean of GHS 2382 (UD $627). Farmers practicing CSA/Agroecology produced higher output per hectare with an average value of GHS 2786 (USD 733) compared to GHS 1978 (UD $521) for conventional cocoa. Considering farm productivity and value of output, respondents in the study generally made profits for the 2014/2015 farming season, indicating improvement in their buffer capacity (resilience) with results (Table 6) showing an average income per hectare of GHS 1726 (USD 454). With farm sizes averaging 2.7 hectares, farmer income from cocoa production for the season ranged from GHS 658.40 (UD $173) to GHS 5865 (USD 1543) per hectare. CSA/Agroecology farmers earned higher incomes with a mean of GHS 1983 (USD 522) per hectare, 29% above that of conventional farmers' (GHS 1470 (UD $387)). With these mean income values for CSA/Agroecology and conventional farming categories associated with a standard deviation of 871.3 and 516.3 respectively, results of the independent sample t-test showed a statistically significant effect, t(62.9) = −3.334, p = 0.002. Thus, income levels from cocoa were statistically higher among farmers practicing CSA/Agroecology than among farmers practicing conventional farming.Furthermore, an assessment of diversity in household income shows that the average on-farm income from non-cocoa related farm activities was 11% higher in CSA/Agroecology (GHS 930) compared to conventional farming (GHS 840). For instance, intercropping annual food crops on cocoa farms is a common practice in both farming systems. However, CSA/Agroecology had a higher diversity of 3 crops on average in contrast to 2 crops in the conventional cocoa farms. Animal rearing (e.g., grass-cutter; Greater cane-rat: Thryonomys swinderianus), bee keeping and economic trees on-farm such as citrus and avocado, augmented household income and hence contribute to their economic resilience. Although statistically not significant (t(47) = −0.280, p = 0.781), non-cocoa farm income levels were higher among farmers practicing CSA/Agroecology than among farmers practicing conventional farming.Both conventional (87.5%) and CSA/Agroecology (80%) cocoa farmers in the study area cultivated cocoa mainly by slashing and burning secondary forests (Deforestation by fire). Figures 2 and 3 show the results from the carbon balance analysis of conventional and CSA/Agroecology cocoa production. While deforestation affected 133 hectares of forests via conventional farming systems in Juabeso, 111 hectares of forest were affected by CSA/Agroecology interventions. Consequently, the study estimated emissions of 64,493 tCO 2 -eq (2150 tCO 2 -eq yearly) with CSA/Agroecology interventions and 76,876 tCO 2 -eq (2563 tCO 2 -eq yearly) with conventional practices over a 30-year period ex-ante. For this period, a carbon sink of 12,383 tCO 2 -eq (413 tCO 2 -eq yearly) is estimated from avoided deforestation as a result of CSA interventions (Figure 2). production. While deforestation affected 133 hectares of forests via conventional farming systems in Juabeso, 111 hectares of forest were affected by CSA/Agroecology interventions. Consequently, the study estimated emissions of 64,493 tCO2-eq (2150 tCO2-eq yearly) with CSA/Agroecology interventions and 76,876 tCO2-eq (2563 tCO2-eq yearly) with conventional practices over a 30-year period ex-ante. For this period, a carbon sink of 12,383 tCO2-eq (413 tCO2-eq yearly) is estimated from avoided deforestation as a result of CSA interventions (Figure 2). Similarly, results from Atwima Mponua indicate 110 and 146 hectares of deforested area with and without CSA/Agroecology interventions respectively. Over a 30-year ex-ante period of consideration, these results indicate future emissions of 63,648 tCO2-eq (2122 tCO2-eq yearly) with and 84,710 tCO2-eq (2824 tCO2-eq yearly) without CSA/Agroecology (Figure 3). The estimated balance of 21,062 tCO2-eq (702 tCO2-eq yearly) represents a carbon sink from avoided deforestation (Figure 3). Thus, CSA/Agroecology practices preserve forest resources (natural capital) without which the effect on carbon balance as presented by conventional farming would remain a source of GHG emissions. Furthermore, in Juabeso (Figure 2), afforestation activities of planting shade trees as engendered in CSA/Agroecology was higher with an average of 11 trees per hectare, in contrast to results shown from conventional practices with 5 trees per hectare. Consequently, CSA/Agroecology was responsible for an estimated sequestration of 8648 tCO2-eq compared to only 2913 tCO2-eq resulting from the fewer trees planted in conventional systems. Hence a carbon balance reflected a sink of 5735 tCO2-eq over a 30 year period (191 tCO2-eq yearly), resulting from improvement via CSA/agroecology interventions beyond the conventional or business as usual practices. Similarly, over the same period in Atwima Mponua (Figure 3), a sink carbon balance of 6008 tCO2-eq (200 tCO2eq yearly) was estimated from afforestation activities. CSA/Agroecology was responsible for sequestration of 8830 tCO2-eq compared to only 2822 tCO2-eq by conventional or business as usual practices.The study also analysed crop systems and farm inputs under CSA/Agroecology and Conventional systems, using the EX-ACT, to further understand associated GHG mitigation potentials. As a perennial crop, the production of cocoa in Juabeso over a 30 year period of analysis generally sequestered an estimated 36,152 tCO2eq in conventional systems compared to 30,267 Similarly, results from Atwima Mponua indicate 110 and 146 hectares of deforested area with and without CSA/Agroecology interventions respectively. Over a 30-year ex-ante period of consideration, these results indicate future emissions of 63,648 tCO 2 -eq (2122 tCO 2 -eq yearly) with and 84,710 tCO 2 -eq (2824 tCO 2 -eq yearly) without CSA/Agroecology (Figure 3). The estimated balance of 21,062 tCO 2 -eq (702 tCO 2 -eq yearly) represents a carbon sink from avoided deforestation (Figure 3). Thus, CSA/Agroecology practices preserve forest resources (natural capital) without which the effect on carbon balance as presented by conventional farming would remain a source of GHG emissions.Furthermore, in Juabeso (Figure 2), afforestation activities of planting shade trees as engendered in CSA/Agroecology was higher with an average of 11 trees per hectare, in contrast to results shown from conventional practices with 5 trees per hectare. Consequently, CSA/Agroecology was responsible for an estimated sequestration of 8648 tCO2-eq compared to only 2913 tCO2-eq resulting from the fewer trees planted in conventional systems. Hence a carbon balance reflected a sink of 5735 tCO2-eq over a 30 year period (191 tCO2-eq yearly), resulting from improvement via CSA/agroecology interventions beyond the conventional or business as usual practices. Similarly, over the same period in Atwima Mponua (Figure 3), a sink carbon balance of 6008 tCO 2 -eq (200 tCO 2 -eq yearly) was estimated from afforestation activities. CSA/Agroecology was responsible for sequestration of 8830 tCO 2 -eq compared to only 2822 tCO 2 -eq by conventional or business as usual practices.The study also analysed crop systems and farm inputs under CSA/Agroecology and Conventional systems, using the EX-ACT, to further understand associated GHG mitigation potentials. As a perennial crop, the production of cocoa in Juabeso over a 30 year period of analysis generally sequestered an estimated 36,152 tCO 2 eq in conventional systems compared to 30,267 tCO 2 eq in CSA/Agroecology (Figure 2). Due to expansive production with closely spaced cocoa trees, typical in conventional farming systems, more cocoa trees were cultivated per hectare and hence the higher carbon sequestration estimates associated with growing the perennial crop compared to CSA/Agroecology. The same situation held true in Atwima Mponua, where over a 30 year period of analysis, cocoa cultivation generally accounted for an estimated sequestration of 39,831 tCO 2 eq in conventional systems compared to 29,871 tCO 2 eq in CSA/Agroecology (Figure 3).Despite the resulting emission source balance of 5885 tCO 2 eq (196 tCO 2 eq yearly) and 9960 tCO 2 eq (332 tCO 2 eq yearly), linked to the intervention of CSA/Agroecology practices in Juabeso and Atwima Mponua respectively, its overall mitigation impact is yet greater considering benefits from avoided deforestation and afforestation practices as explained above.Emissions from farm investments and inputs such as application of fertilizer, pesticides, spraying and fuel use were higher at 760 tCO 2 eq (25 tCO 2 eq yearly) with practices under CSA/Agroecology compared to 396 tCO 2 eq (13 tCO 2 eq yearly) in conventional systems at Juabeso. This is justified from the observation that cocoa farms under CSA/Agroecology were more intensified with relatively higher inputs, compared to those in the conventional systems. In the case of Atwima Mponua, a sink balance of 26 tCO 2 eq (1 tCO 2 eq yearly) is projected and accounted for by a carbon source of 90 tCO 2 eq (3 tCO 2 eq yearly) due to farm input under conventional systems and 65 tCO 2 eq (2 tCO 2 eq yearly) from farm input approaches under CSA/Agroecology. This was due to lower or no input organic farming practices, typical with CSA/Agroecology systems in that part of the study area.Though CSA/Agroecology groups were historically formed by external project organizations (Rainforest Alliance and Agro-Eco Louis Bolk Institute), these groups have thrived over time through institutions created by farmers themselves.Farmers indicated in the focus group discussions that they introduced their own rules and regulations, ways of enforcements and related punitive measures such as fines for non-compliance to these introduced organizational rules by members. These local institutions also worked to improve knowledge and skills of members and access to their rights and entitlements mainly through their own initiatives. Through fellow members whom they had selected and promoted with the groups' resources as lead farmers, they interact with stakeholders at various levels and information and skills acquired through this process is shared within the groups. Further 90% of CSA/Agroecology farmers compared to only 38% of Conventional farmers had access to extension and advisory services; and 45% of CSA/Agroecology farmers compared to 15% of conventional farmers had access to government's free improved planting materials.The integration of CSA/Agroecology farmers, into their respective farmer organizations is also driven by trust. Thus, farmers who are believed to be trustworthy and could trust others, worked together to enhance their livelihood. 25% of farmers who were not members of any farmer organization identified mistrust in others as an important reason, while 25% were refused admission into their desired groups. Through such processes, CSA/Agroecology farmers in different instances collectively organized assets at their disposal to support enhancements of their livelihoods such as through buying spraying machines, training lead farmers and maintaining demonstration farms.These interrelations between farmers' abilities (buffer capacities), in terms of ownership of livelihood capitals and exercise of necessary utility rights, highlight the contribution of farmer self-organization to livelihood resilience. Majority of CSA/Agroecology cocoa farmers (95%) rather than conventional farmers (23%) however, have willingly become group members in order to secure their livelihoods.Results from the FGDs indicated that farmers were generally aware of what constituted threats (mainly high temperatures and rainfall variability) and opportunities to their livelihoods. However, transfer of new ideas and technology is challenged mostly in conventional farming due to limited interaction among conventional farmers and key stakeholders. In contrast, CSA/Agroecology farmers demonstrated commitment to learning through creation and use of existing group-managed demonstration farms for experimentations and transfer of knowledge and technology. They also engaged visiting extension officers and their lead farmers acquired training from relevant agencies.Based on previous experiences with unfavourable tree tenure, CSA/Agroecology farmer groups have engaged with the officials of the Forestry Commission of Ghana to register trees they have planted on-farm to protect their ownership and rights. However, conventional farmers have not exercised such agency to take advantage of this collaboration but are rather demotivated to plant trees on their farms due to illegal logging by chainsaw operators without appropriate compensation to the conventional farmers. In addition, analysis of selected farm management practices (Figure 4), underscored that CSA systems indicated higher commitments for learning, by following and implementing recommended best practices better than in conventional systems, although this strategy may be tied to the conditions set by the organizations for CSA/Agroecology farmers to access farm inputs.Land 2018, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 21Based on previous experiences with unfavourable tree tenure, CSA/Agroecology farmer groups have engaged with the officials of the Forestry Commission of Ghana to register trees they have planted on-farm to protect their ownership and rights. However, conventional farmers have not exercised such agency to take advantage of this collaboration but are rather demotivated to plant trees on their farms due to illegal logging by chainsaw operators without appropriate compensation to the conventional farmers. In addition, analysis of selected farm management practices (Figure 4), underscored that CSA systems indicated higher commitments for learning, by following and implementing recommended best practices better than in conventional systems, although this strategy may be tied to the conditions set by the organizations for CSA/Agroecology farmers to access farm inputs. Despite a general awareness of climate risks on cocoa production, livelihoods diversification was moderately undertaken in each of the farming systems. While CSA/Agroecology systems showed more diversity on-farm in terms of non-cocoa crops and forest/shade tree cover, conventional systems were averagely more diversified with respect to non-farm economic activitiesResults of the logistic regression model to identify the factors affecting CSA/Agroecology practices are presented in Table 7. Using the specifications with the dependent variable measured as 1 if farmer practiced CSA/Agroecology and 0 if farmer practiced conventional farming, a maximum likelihood procedure was used to estimate the parameters. The co-efficient of determination, Pseudo R 2 of 0.446, indicate that about 44.6% of variation in the practice of CSA/Agroecology could be explained by the explanatory variables. The model is statistically significant at 1%.Farm tenure, age of farmer, location (district), residential status and access to extension services were the main determining factors influencing CSA/Agroecology practices. Farm Tenure was Despite a general awareness of climate risks on cocoa production, livelihoods diversification was moderately undertaken in each of the farming systems. While CSA/Agroecology systems showed more diversity on-farm in terms of non-cocoa crops and forest/shade tree cover, conventional systems were averagely more diversified with respect to non-farm economic activitiesResults of the logistic regression model to identify the factors affecting CSA/Agroecology practices are presented in Table 7. Using the specifications with the dependent variable measured as 1 if farmer practiced CSA/Agroecology and 0 if farmer practiced conventional farming, a maximum likelihood procedure was used to estimate the parameters. The co-efficient of determination, Pseudo R 2 of 0.446, indicate that about 44.6% of variation in the practice of CSA/Agroecology could be explained by the explanatory variables. The model is statistically significant at 1%. Farm tenure, age of farmer, location (district), residential status and access to extension services were the main determining factors influencing CSA/Agroecology practices. Farm Tenure was statistically significant at 5% indicating that farmers who owned their farms were 39% more likely to adopt CSA/Agroecology practices than those who managed family farms and 43% more likely to practice CSA than share croppers. While age of farmer was positively significant at 10%, results showed non-linearity in the variable as the square of farmer age was negatively significant at 10%. Thus, farmers are more likely to practice CSA/Agroecology with increase in their age but this tendency of CSA practice eventually drops with further age increase.Location has an influence on the practice of CSA/Agroecology. 'District' as a variable was significant at 10%, showing a 37% likelihood of CSA/Agroecology practice in Juabeso more than in Atwima Mponua District. However, with residential status remaining positively significant at 5%, native farmers are 39% less likely to practice CSA/Agroecology than settlers. Further, access to extension services has a positive significant effect at 1% on the practice of CSA/Agroecology in cocoa production. It is 73% likely that increasing farmer access to extension services increases farmer adoption of CSA/Agroecology practices. Nevertheless, farmer level of education, household dependency ratio and access to credit were positively related to CSA/Agroecology but were not statistically significant.The results indicate higher income in CSA agroecology systems. The average yield for conventional systems (363 kg/ha) identified in this study is validated by the national average of 350-400 kg/ha [15,35], mainly reflecting the conventional cocoa production practiced by most farmers in Ghana. The relatively higher yields (501 kg/ha) attributed to CSA/Agroecology, is confirmed by Aidoo and Fromm (2015) [39], who reported similar results for farmers engaged in certification for implementing more sustainable practices in the Ashanti Region of Ghana.CSA/Agroecology farmers also had higher financial capital as evidenced in their average incomes (29% more) and hence increased their purchasing power as observed in their average farm investments (32% more) compared to conventional farmers. Incremental financial capital can buffer livelihood risks (such as poor soil fertility, pests and diseases, etc.), since farmers are more capable to finance their strategies (such as fertilizer application, spraying pesticides, etc.) to reduce or cope with the risks, which is a crucial dimension of livelihood resilience [40].Through intercropping of diverse non-cocoa crops (particularly food crops), respective CSA/Agroecology households invariably have access to food and are additionally provided with income (10% more than conventional) mainly due to higher cropping intensities and diversities. Such farm households earn additional incomes directly from the sale of food products including plantain, yams, fruits, honey, vegetables etc., and indirectly from monies saved that would have been otherwise used to buy food [41]. Furthermore, through agroforestry practices that increase carbon stocks on-farm and hence reduce GHG emissions, CSA/Agroecology provides a potential opportunity for additional household incomes from carbon credits through the result-based national REDD+ programme [42]. However, this potential raises questions on equity concerning how farmers would be fairly rewarded from carbon credits and other related benefits for achieving mitigation benefits. This is because there is not yet clarity on key issues around the development of a fair and transparent benefit sharing scheme and carbon rights definition, land and tree tenure and gender mainstreaming mechanisms are still outstanding, which have dominated the REDD+ implementation discourse [41].While CSA/Agroecology contributed to increased yields and incomes which in turn build resilience of farmers' livelihoods through improved food security (also from higher variety and output of food crops) and enhanced buffer capacity [39], the study also considers the hypothetical diminishing of this buffer capacity given the susceptibility of cocoa to reduction in rainfall particularly during the dry season and increased temperatures which have worsened due to increase climate variability and change [16]. The following further places the discussions in this context to highlight the potential of CSA/Agroecology to mitigate such climatic risks and adapt to associated impacts.Although farmers clear fell and burn secondary forests to plant cocoa crops before the adoption of recommended practices, the emission effect was lower with the intervention of CSA/Agroecology. This is explained by the effect of avoided deforestation for the purposes of farm expansions as CSA/Agroecology farmers were rather shifting to intensification practices. Unlike conventional farmers who typically employ low input and aim to increase yields by expanding the area of land cultivated and hence further deforest secondary or virgin forests [9], CSA farmers rather intensify input investment in relatively smaller areas of land to increase productivity thereby saving carbon stock in forest, which would have otherwise been burnt.According to Cambell et al. (2014) the approach of sustainable intensification is an essential means of adapting to climate change, also resulting in lower emissions per unit of output and is highly complementary with CSA [43]. Gockowski and Sonwa (2011) further observed in their study of rural livelihoods in the Guinea rain forest of West Africa that this strategy not only mitigate deforestation and carbon emissions but also biodiversity loss and enhance poverty alleviation and rural development [44], all of which are essential ingredients for strengthening adaptive capacities against and building resilience to climate variability and change.Increase in income among CSA/Agroecology farmers was inextricably linked to their respective higher value in social capital (increase in other assets due to membership or participation in social networks; labour support from group members and income gained through membership in groups) and vice versa. This also influenced their higher capacities for learning via institutionalising group processes and their ability to further mobilise more resources to protect their livelihoods as a collective. To protect and enhance their livelihoods, CSA/Agroecology farmers actively self-organised and integrated into farmer based groups such that they subject themselves to rules and regulation, offer themselves to trust and be trusted and pulling resources together as well as remaining open to information and new ideas for the achievement of livelihood outcomes. Hence enhancement in not only their buffer capacities but also their social capital and capacity for learning as dimensions of resilience [39] This is further supported by Mohammed et al.'s (2013) [45] observation of a positive relationship between social capital and access to credit.CSA/Agroecology farmers have also generally demonstrated agency through resources at their disposal including increased economic power from higher incomes and political influences through the functioning group dynamics. These represented the foundation on which they engaged with the officials of the Forestry Commission of Ghana and which was instrumental in protecting their interest in established tree tenure for example. Asare (2014) argues that making the shift to a sustainable and climate resilient cocoa landscape will require significant changes, including extensive coordination and collaboration between key stakeholders, many of which have traditionally not collaborated, like the Cocoa Board and the Forestry Commission [10]. These forms of cooperation have implicitly been initiated by CSA practices. In accordance to the a priori expectations of the study, farm tenure influenced the practice of CSA/Agroecology in the study area showing that farmers are more likely to invest time and resources on their own farms than on farms where ownership right is insecure [16,35]. Secure land tenure thus has a significant effect on agricultural production and the ways in which rural livelihoods are sustained. According to Acheampong et al. (2014) [35], the security and quality of land tenure rights directly affect how respective resources are used and managed.Linking this situation to resilience, up-scaling the practice of CSA in the study areas will require the processes of land and farm right acquisition to foster farmers with greater security in terms of ownership and rights to use (entitlement). Freudenberger (1994) [46] argues that local land and farm tenure system in Ghana is complex, adaptive and evolves over time in response to changing ecological and socio-economic conditions. Given that this is a product of the interaction of customary laws as guaranteed by government statute [47], local and public institutions are crucial as they influence options and strategies available to farmers to sustain their livelihoods. Therefore, institutional reforms must create conducive environments that reduce farmers' risk associated with accessibility of farmlands. Short term interests acquired by migrant farmers in lands or in farms as well as the resources on them should therefore be ensured by capitalising on Customary Land Secretariat systems to enhance enabling contractual agreements between them and their respective land or farm owners [44].According to the results, the adoption and practice of CSA/Agroecology grew with increase in farmers' age but only up to a threshold beyond which adoption of CSA/Agroecology practices declined as farmers grew older. Farmers also tend to reduce farm investments as well as the propensity to experiment or employ new technologies as they grow older. Knowler and Bradshaw (2007), Aneani et al. (2012), Obuobisa-Darko (2015) [21,33,34] indicated that older cocoa farmers in Ghana are more resistant to shift from traditional practices to improved ones as they are risk averse.However, it needs to be considered that younger farmers are less likely to have the necessary endowments in livelihood assets or capitals compared to older farmers. Thus, access to natural capital (farmlands), financial capital (credit, bank loans), human capital (farm experience, know-how), social capital (household control, trust) and physical capital (access to technologies) are more likely to be limited among younger farmers than older ones. These have implications for the extent of practice of CSA/Agroecology among younger farmers despite their will to change considering that Mumuni and Oladele (2016) [48] observed young farmers are more likely to develop entrepreneurial abilities than aged ones. To overcome these barriers, institutions and policies governing the sector need to not only target CSA/Agroecology technologies among young farmers but also enhance their capacities to improve their relatively weak buffer capacities and livelihood resilience [39,49].The location of farmers also influenced their tendency to practice CSA/Agroecology with farmers in Juabeso District being more engaged in CSA/Agroecology systems than those of Atwima Mponua. This can be explained by the status of Juabeso district as part of the Western Region, which is recognised as the cocoa hub of the country and produces more than half of the country's cocoa [9]. This comparative advantage could also be linked to government and private sector interventions to support cocoa farmers through fertilizer distribution, free cocoa farm spraying exercises, extension and technical support services and other important facilities, skewed towards the Juabeso district. Thus, significant variations in socio-economic and ecological contexts can explain the success of CSA/Agroecology interventions.Farmers' residential status was identified to be a significantly influential factor determining farmers' capacity to practice CSA/Agroecology in Ghana. Contrary to a priori expectations, the results showed that native farmers rather have lower tendencies to practice CSA/Agroecology than migrant farmers. This contradicts other findings [37,50] that associate unsustainable land management practices with migrant farmers because of their short-term insecure land access and interests in faster and higher returns, than natives with more secured interest and as such greater incentive to sustainably preserve the quality of land.Van der Geest (2011) [51] also challenged findings attributing unsustainable land management practices to Dagara migrants in Ghana's Brong Ahafo Region. Given that migrant farmers in Ghana have mostly been displaced by environmental change [49], their experiences and awareness of previous threats are likely to define their capacity for learning in their new locations to build livelihood resilience. According to Marney et al. (2014) [49], migration of farmers in Ghana is mostly an adaptation strategy and in the process migrants expand their social networks with stronger ties through which they access information, while deploying social-ecological memory as potential agents of innovation and adaptation. Thus, there is a need to revise unpopular perceptions that associate migrant farmers with growing forest degradation in Ghana, while enabling their adaptation as they have potentials to be agents of change through innovation, technological transfer and adoption. In cases of environmentally induced migration, recognition should be given to migrant farmers in Ghana's climate change adaptation policies to provide them with adaptation opportunities and rights, similar to non-migrant farmers.It is expected that increased access to extension services by farmers will correspondingly increase CSA/Agroecology adoption and practice [34,36]. Anim-Kwapong and Frimpong (2010) [16] argued in this relation that cocoa farmers in Ghana are quite conservative and as such require very effective extension systems to motivate them adopt innovations and new technologies. Yet the processes of extension in Ghana have not been effective mainly due to financial constraints [36]. This condition also produces risks in adaptation to climate change.However, with institutional bottlenecks, processes of agricultural extension initiated out of the agency of farmers to build their own capacities as evidenced by the CSA/Agroecology farmer groups should be encouraged. Collaborations between farmers and responsible institutions for extension service delivery would be instrumental in closing this gap. For instance, involving farmers in extension delivery through the concept of \"Lead Farmers\" where selected farmers from farmer groups are equipped with extension delivery skills in order to train and educate their colleagues would be a vital strategy towards reducing livelihood risks under current conditions among cocoa farmers in Ghana.This study has shown that average farm productivity and average income is significantly higher among farmers practicing CSA/Agroecology, who also incur higher farm investment costs required to meet recommended practices, than conventional cocoa farmers. Premiums additionally paid to cocoa CSA/Agroecology farmers for undertaking these recommended practices under certification schemes also augmented their incomes, in addition to income from non-cocoa farm production. The relatively high income is linked to enhancements in other livelihood capitals and hence increased ownership of livelihood assets and utility rights such as in land tenure for example. With enhanced buffer capacity and resilience, farmers practicing CSA/Agroecology also indicated better self-organisation with higher capacity for learning in an inter-linked fashion, contributing more to livelihood resilience than in conventional farming systems. Further, the study highlights that trade-offs may exist between practicing CSA/Agroecology cocoa production and diversification of farmer livelihoods as a climate change adaptation strategy.The estimations of carbon balance due to land-use change, crop production and farm input use, using the EX-ACT tool varied with different production systems. While farm input intensification practices of CSA/Agroecology have negative implications for climate mitigation, CSA/Agroecology practices, overall have positive impacts on GHG mitigation without which cocoa landscapes would be a source of emission. The contributions of CSA to climate mitigation however showed no direct impact on farmers' livelihood resilience. The study however found that the institutional processes of obtaining land or farm ownership and rights (land/farm tenure system) in Ghana, age of farmers, geographical location of farmers (district), farmers' residential status and their access to agricultural extension services were the main factors influencing the practice of CSA/Agroecology in the study area and by extension resilience to climate change impacts on cocoa production.While the study assessed resilience with selected proxy indicators, the analysis hints that a comprehensive resilience profile of cocoa production systems integrating all relevant indicators and related proxies under each of the three components of resilience (buffer capacity, self-organization and capacity for learning) should be further studied. This also means re-examining the concept of CSA that captures resilience as one of its components. It is also instrumental to research existing trade-offs that exist with practice of CSA by cocoa farmers and to assess the extent to which they can be minimised."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2294432824.json b/main/part_2/2294432824.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..daac4b212f6fa65f3d75cb29b4e3b72ce77530ea --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2294432824.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"87704a46-fae1-427a-9d14-87add8d8c65d","content":"\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2302401493.json b/main/part_2/2302401493.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f14f431e5a22515a397ea0f5d64de29d22950462 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2302401493.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"8f907a2a-7092-4e8a-a754-94275fa780e3","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2310445293.json b/main/part_2/2310445293.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecd40559a000fec34872564a9e3f4199f505abf1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2310445293.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6c6295658472c6ff9447a553abc59582","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f00c35c5-be83-4d03-be2c-06705342a1b0/retrieve","id":"2138867700"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d2f43896-e222-4014-bc8a-3fa18ae47306","content":"Version originale publiée en anglais sous le titre Beekeeping par Macmillan Education, division de Macmillan Publishers Limited, en coopération avec le CTA et l'IBRA (International Bee Research Association), en 2006 Cette édition a été traduite et publiée sous licence de Macmillan Education. L'auteur a revendiqué le droit d'être identifié comme auteur de cet ouvrage.Le Centre technique de coopération agricole et rurale (CTA) a été créé en 1983 dans le cadre de la Convention de Lomé entre les États du Groupe ACP (Afrique, Caraïbes, Pacifique) et les pays membres de l'Union européenne. Depuis 2000, le CTA exerce ses activités dans le cadre de l'Accord de Cotonou ACP-CE.Le CTA a pour mission de développer et de fournir des services qui améliorent l'accès des pays ACP à l'information pour le développement agricole et rural, et de renforcer les capacités de ces pays à produire, acquérir, échanger et exploiter l'information dans ce domaine. Les programmes du CTA sont conçus pour : fournir un large éventail de produits et services d'information et mieux faire connaître les sources d'information pertinentes ; encourager l'utilisation combinée de canaux de communication adéquats et intensifier les contacts et les échanges d'information, entre les acteurs ACP en particulier ; renforcer la capacité ACP à produire et à gérer l'information agricole et à mettre en oeuvre des stratégies de GIC, notamment en rapport avec la science et la technologie. Le travail du CTA tient compte de l'évolution des méthodologies et des questions transversales telles que le genre et le capital social.Le CTA est financé par l'Union européenne.CTA -Postbus 380 -6700 AJ Wageningen -Pays-Bas -www.cta.int Préface de l'édition française « Si l'abeille venait à disparaître, l'homme n'aurait plus que quelques années à vivre », prophétisait Einstein… Les abeilles font en effet partie depuis des millénaires de la culture et du patrimoine humain, et elles sont donc essentielles au maintien d'une biodiversité végétale très importante pour l'humanité. Pourtant, ces insectes si utiles semblent de plus en plus menacés et il s'agit bien d'un problème mondial aux multiples causes. Il est donc d'autant plus important de s'intéresser encore et toujours aux abeilles et à l'apiculture, pour en améliorer les méthodes et les productions de façon durable, et cela notamment dans les pays en développement.L'apiculture peut en effet constituer une option très intéressante pour diversifier les activités des petits producteurs locaux. Elle peut être menée dans beaucoup de situations au monde, en particulier dans la majorité des régions chaudes ou tropicales. Rarement exercée en tant qu'activité principale, l'apiculture permet, grâce aux produits de la ruche, de compléter les revenus familiaux, et requiert peu de temps et d'investissement, si elle est conduite à petite échelle . Les produits majeurs de la ruche, la cire et le miel, sont bénéfiques pour la famille mais peuvent aussi être vendus sur le marché local ou à destination d'utilisateurs plus lointains. Des produits supplémentaires, tels le pollen, le couvain, la gelée royale ou la propolis, possèdent aussi des propriétés nutritionnelles et thérapeutiques de premier ordre. Enfin, la pollinisation assurée par les abeilles permet souvent d'améliorer le rendement des cultures et joue un rôle important pour l'ensemble de la flore.Pour toutes ces raisons, cet ouvrage de vulgarisation de l'apiculture tropicale intéressera nombre d'acteurs du milieu rural et de familles des pays ACP et plus généralement des pays en développement. L'auteur de la version anglaise, Peter David Paterson, spécialiste de l'api culture en Afrique, y décrit de façon pratique les éléments de base de la conduite d'un rucher en régions chaudes. La réalisation et la maîtrise du matériel apicole, la récolte et le traitement des produits de la ruche y sont décrits de façon opérationnelle. Les méthodes traditionnelles et améliorées de production du miel sont présentées de façon simple et illustrée, avec des précisions utiles, telles que les critères du choix des techniques apicoles les mieux adaptées à une situation donnée.Pour la version française, nous tenons à remercier chaleureusement Maurice Chaudière, apiculteur dans le sud de la France, auteur de l'Apiculture alternative (2005), pour la relecture de la traduction en français, la suggestion de certaines précisions et de quelques compléments brefs mais significatifs. Les techniques qu'il a expérimentées pour la France, décrites dans son ouvrage, visent à promouvoir une apiculture économe et biologique ; ces techniques sont aussi tout à fait pertinentes et adaptées à la production apicole sous les tropiques.Directeur de la collection « Agricultures tropicales en poche » Préface de l'édition originale anglaise Que Peter Paterson ait entrepris ce grand oeuvre me comble en tout point. Il s'agit là d'un remarquable recueil qui s'appuie sur une source d'information précieuse entre toutes : l'expérience pratique. Je suis également très heureux, et me sens profondément honoré qu'il se soit tourné vers moi pour me demander de rédiger cette préface.L'Afrique est la terre d'origine de l'abeille domestique, Apis mellifera . Il s'ensuit que ce continent, à l'instar des Caraïbes et du Pacifique, dispose de milieux parfaitement adaptés à son élevage. L'apiculture est une forme d'agriculture durable, susceptible de constituer une source de nourriture et, surtout, d'utiles revenus pour les populations rurales. Elle permet par ailleurs de donner une justification économique à la préservation des milieux naturels et, potentiellement, d'accroître les rendements des cultures vivrières et fourragères.Il existe pour la cire d'abeille un marché tout prêt à se développer, à la fois sur le plan local et à l'exportation. Le marché du miel, quant à lui, dépend davantage de la qualité du produit proposé et des caprices des taux de change entre monnaies. En améliorant leur savoir-faire et leur matériel, les apiculteurs deviennent capables de diversifier la gamme des produits qu'ils tirent de l'élevage des abeilles.L'apiculture est une activité qui convient particulièrement aux agriculteurs sans grandes ressources des régions tropicales, et ce, pour plusieurs raisons : le miel et la cire sont des produits utiles et précieux ; la pollinisation par les abeilles peut profiter à beaucoup d'espèces cultivées et accroître les rendements, notamment lorsque le nombre des pollinisateurs indigènes a été réduit par l'utilisation abusive de pesticides ;il n'est pas nécessaire de disposer d'un matériel coûteux : des ruches simples peuvent être réalisées à partir de matériaux trouvés sur place ; la fabrication des ruches et du matériel apicole en général est une activité susceptible de stimuler l'économie locale ; les abeilles se nourrissent du pollen et du nectar des fleurs et n'ont pas besoin d'aliment complémentaire (bien que les apiculteurs leur fournissent parfois du sirop de sucre après la récolte du miel) ; -----le nectar et le pollen récoltés par les abeilles sont une ressource sous-exploitée, non utilisée par les autres animaux d'élevage -ce qui permet de mettre en valeur des terrains par ailleurs inexploitables ; les techniques de base de l'apiculture sont faciles à apprendre ; les abeilles n'ont pas besoin de soins quotidiens et les activités apicoles peuvent être modulées en fonction du temps dont on dispose ; l'apiculture ne mobilise aucune terre de valeur : les ruches sont installées dans des arbres, sur des terrains incultes ou sur des toits plats ;l'apiculture peut être pratiquée par des personnes de tous âges ; l'apiculture aide à accéder à une certaine autonomie et encourage le travail en réseau par la constitution d'associations et de coopératives d'apiculteurs.Après l'être humain, l'abeille est sans doute, de toutes les espèces au monde, celle qui a été la plus étudiée. Bien qu'elles ne puissent pas être domestiquées au sens commun du terme, les colonies d'abeilles peuvent être élevées et gérées. C'est avec une écriture claire et pédagogique, complétée par de remarquables illustrations, que ce livre s'emploie à expliquer comment y parvenir. Dans ces pages la quintessence des bonnes pratiques en apiculture tropicale est finement déployée. Les connaissances réunies ont été acquises au cours de nombreuses années d'observation et d'application attentives et réfléchies. Rares sont ceux qui détiennent un tel niveau de savoir, et plus rares encore sont ceux capables de le transmettre. C'est donc une chance inouïe pour nous que Peter ait accepté de partager ses connaissances dans cet ouvrage éminemment pratique, et je suis convaincu que beaucoup d'apiculteurs, qu'ils soient déjà actifs ou apprentis, lui en seront reconnaissants.Président de l'International Bee Research Association Cardiff, Royaume-Uni Février 2006.------ministère kenyan de l'agriculture, et à feu Keith Foot, du comité kenyan National Freedom from Hunger. Je remercie également la famille Nightingale, et surtout Jim, qui avait l'expérience la plus fine et les facultés d'observation les plus développées de tous les apiculteurs que j'ai connus en Afrique.Ma connaissance profonde de l'Afrique rurale ne serait pas ce qu'elle est sans les extraordinaires safaris entrepris en Afrique de l'Est et de l'Ouest en compagnie de Malcolm Harper. Sa contribution à l'apiculture ne se résume pas à faciliter les projets ; il a aussi rapporté une ruche traditionnelle malienne en terre et vannerie, découverte quelque part près de Mopti, pour enrichir la collection de l'International Bee Research Association.J'exprime en outre ma gratitude envers Heather Latham et Jacques Maiglia pour leur hospitalité et leur aide au Zaïre (Jacques a traduit mes premières notes en français pour qu'elles puissent être utilisées dans les pays francophones), ainsi qu'à Bernard Clauss, dont la connaissance intime des méthodes traditionnelles d'apiculture et l'enthousiasme pour les « techniques de brousse » m'ont beaucoup rassuré.Je remercie par ailleurs Kersten Schade, Paul Latham, Peter How, Neem Biviji et Richard Jones, qui ont gentiment accepté de relire mon manuscrit et m'ont fait part de nombreuses suggestions pertinentes, et surtout Eva Crane, dont l'intelligence limpide et clairvoyante m'a orienté vers une approche plus ordonnée. Merci également à Sue Parrott, de Green Ink, et à Helen van Houten pour leur talent d'éditrices, ainsi qu'aux éditeurs qui ont rendu cette publication possible. Je suis très reconnaissant envers Timothy Njoroge, dont les dessins apportent tant de riches détails à ce livre. Les originaux se trouvent à la bibliothèque de Rura, à Karen, au Kenya.J'ai beaucoup voyagé, surtout pour la cause des abeilles, et toutes les personnes accueillantes que j'ai rencontrées en chemin ont contribué à faire progresser mes connaissances sur ce sujet. Aussi ma gratitude va-t-elle à mes amis et collègues apiculteurs de quantité de pays, et notamment aux apiculteurs traditionnels de brousse, en compagnie desquels j'ai passé de longues heures de bonheur, à apprendre et à partager maintes techniques et expériences nouvelles. Mon souhait est maintenant de partager ce savoir apicole avec vous.Peter David Paterson Février 2006 1. IntroductionLe miel est depuis longtemps l'un des aliments les plus appréciés. Pour les sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs, il est encore aujourd'hui le seul produit sucrant facile à trouver. D'autres productions issues des abeilles ont également été depuis longtemps exploitées par l'homme. Le couvain (stades larvaires des abeilles qui se développent dans des rayons de cire au sein de la ruche) est traditionnellement consommé comme aliment riche en protéines, tandis que la cire d'abeille est utilisée pour la confection de bougies, pour les moulages à la cire perdue et comme objet de troc.La collecte du miel sauvage est une activité traditionnelle en Afrique et demeure viable tant que la densité de population est faible et que la flore naturelle exploitée par les abeilles est abondante. Toutefois, elle a été, dans une large mesure, remplacée par l'élevage des abeilles -l'apiculture. Une solide tradition apicole existe dans beaucoup de campagnes africaines, et cette activité joue un rôle important au sein de l'économie rurale. Au cours du siècle passé, alors que le flot de connaissances qui se répandait sur le sujet parvenait à un nombre croissant d'apiculteurs, les méthodes d'élevage se sont nettement améliorées. Dans le même temps, la croissance démographique et l'exode vers les villes ont entraîné la dégradation de la végétation naturelle et le déclin de l'apiculture traditionnelle. Aux Caraïbes et dans le Pacifique, les abeilles domestiques ont été introduites il y a relativement peu de temps.Les chiffres précis et fiables sont rares, mais les observateurs noteront un net recul de l'apiculture traditionnelle dans bien des régions d'Afrique. Un des facteurs en est l'intensification de l'agriculture, fréquemment corrélée à la dégradation de la végétation mellifère et à un recours excessif aux pesticides . Une autre raison de ce fléchissement est l'augmentation significative, parfois catastrophique, des atteintes aux ruches dans les zones où la population est en mutation ou en accroissement. De moins en moins de jeunes, qui plus est, prennent la suite de leurs parents dans cette activité.Cependant, une nouvelle génération d'apiculteurs apparaît, toute disposée à adopter les méthodes d'élevage plus modernes. Les statistiques manquent de fiabilité en ce qui concerne le nombre de nouvelles ruches effectivement fabriquées, distribuées ou achetées. De plus, ces chiffres restent muets quant au nombre de ruches toujours occupées et productives une année ou deux après. Les apiculteurs des régions tropicales et subtropicales utilisent et expérimentent un grand nombre de méthodes très diverses, des plus traditionnelles aux plus modernes. Si certaines techniques et certains programmes se révèlent très positifs, d'autres se soldent par des échecs. Ces derniers sont le plus souvent dus à une technologie inadaptée aux conditions locales ou à un niveau insuffisant de savoir-faire. Dès lors que la technique est au point et la formation présente, l'amélioration des pratiques apicoles est toujours possible, même s'il arrive que les nouvelles méthodes soient mieux acceptées par ceux qui n'ont aucune expérience préalable de l'apiculture. Au-delà des problèmes d'ordre technique, l'un des principaux facteurs d'échec reste cependant un défaut de réflexion économique. Très souvent, les méthodes traditionnelles se révèlent économiquement plus viables que les pratiques importées.Dans les régions des Caraïbes et du Pacifique, l'apiculture s'appuie généralement sur des ruches à cadres mobiles avec des abeilles européennes, mais les ruches à barrettes suscitent actuellement un intérêt croissant du fait de la relative simplicité de leur conception et de leur coût modique.La justification première d'élever des abeilles est de produire du miel . Le miel est intéressant en tant que produit sucrant, aliment et agent de fermentation pour la bière de miel . Il s'agit, en outre, d'une denrée facilement négociable contre de l'argent, ou susceptible de constituer une dot ou un cadeau par exemple. Le miel est également de plus en plus recherché pour ses propriétés médicinales et cosmétiques. La production de miel se double par ailleurs d'un sous-produit intéressant, la cire d'abeille : celle-ci, qui présente l'avantage supplémentaire d'être non périssable, peut être utilisée sur place pour confectionner des bougies, mais elle est plus souvent commercialisée car son prix de vente est relativement élevé. D'un point de vue plus général, l'intérêt principal des abeilles réside surtout dans leur rôle d'insectes pollinisateurs. Élever des abeilles est susceptible d'accroître le rendement en fruits ou en grains de beaucoup de plantes cultivées, et c'est pourquoi certains cultivateurs modernes s'adonnent eux-mêmes à cette activité, ou paient des apiculteurs pour placer des ruches près de leurs cultures. En outre, le pollen devient progressivement un produit à part entière, récolté dans les ruches grâce à des trappes à pollen. S'il existe déjà un marché spécialisé du pollen dans le cadre des filières des produits d'alimentation naturelle et biologique, l'intérêt majeur de cette denrée pourrait s'appliquer à la population locale, en tant que complément alimentaire riche en protéines. La propolis, une substance gommeuse récoltée par les abeilles principalement sur les plantes ligneuses, connaît également une utilisation croissante. Elle est utilisée localement pour colmater les fuites des récipients d'eau, par exemple, mais la prise de conscience progressive de ses propriétés médicinales et antibiotiques en fait par ailleurs un produit de plus en plus commercialisé.L'apiculture, par l'utilisation et la vente de ses produits, contribue à améliorer les conditions d'existence de celui qui s'y consacre. Elle contribue aussi à l'économie rurale environnante, non seulement en pollinisant les cultures, mais encore en stimulant les échanges commerciaux. En effet une entreprise apicole dynamique a un impact positif sur la communauté dans laquelle elle s'insère ; c'est le cas pour ceux qui transforment ou vendent les productions des abeilles mais aussi pour ceux qui fabriquent les ruches, les enfumoirs, les vêtements de protection, le matériel de conditionnement, etc.Le poids de l'activité apicole varie selon les régions, mais elle constitue parfois une part significative de l'économie locale, voire nationale. Ainsi, l'Angola, l'Éthiopie et la Tanzanie sont depuis longtemps au nombre des plus grands exportateurs de cire d'abeille du monde. Les exportations africaines de miel ne portent certes pas sur de gros volumes, mais elles existent -souvent à titre expérimental -, par chargements isolés. Les exportations sont limitées parce que le miel africain n'est pas disponible en quantité suffisamment importante à un prix compétitif sur le marché international. Bien que le produit de base, tel qu'il est élaboré par les abeilles, soit de qualité comparable à celui obtenu ailleurs dans le monde, les miels africains sont trop souvent mal traités par les producteurs ou les intermédiaires. Un manque de soin à la récolte peut ainsi se traduire par l'obtention d'un miel trouble, contenant du pollen. La qualité du produit dépend aussi des conditions du stockage : un miel entreposé dans un conteneur rouillé peut voir son goût se dégrader fortement et sa teinte s'obscurcir. Beaucoup de miels africains ont une robe sombre et une saveur prononcée. Il ne s'agit pas là de défauts à proprement parler, mais ce ne sont pas toujours des caractéristiques recherchées par les consommateurs. Le miel africain est relativement cher parce qu'il est généralement produit dans des petites structures et diffusé dans des filières de commercialisation plus longues.Certaines bières traditionnelles africaines sont élaborées avec du miel, et ce commerce pèse lourdement sur le prix de la matière première dans bon nombre de pays. La concurrence et la demande des brasseurs tendent tout à la fois à faire monter les prix et à diminuer la qualité des miels. Tous les miels peuvent fermenter et, dans la pratique, les brasseurs préfèrent souvent le miel provenant de vieux rayons -peutêtre parce que le pollen et les autres résidus facilitent la fermentation et améliorent la saveur.Cet ouvrage présente une somme d'informations et d'enseignements qui permettra aux apiculteurs et agriculteurs tropicaux de mieux connaître les abeilles. Plusieurs techniques susceptibles d'aider tout un chacun à tirer parti de ces insectes y sont décrites, l'accent étant mis sur les moins onéreuses. Le but de ce livre est d'attirer l'attention sur les moyens de parvenir au meilleur rapport à partir d'éléments de départ adaptés ; il ne fait pas la promotion des techniques de pointe, dans la mesure où ces dernières ne sont pas toujours les plus rentables. Ceux qui souhaiteraient développer une apiculture avec des ruches à cadres mobiles et des programmes de sélection de reines, devraient consulter d'autres ouvrages sur le sujet, dont certains figurent dans la bibliographie.Ce livre traite brièvement le problème des ravageurs et des maladies des abeilles en région tropicale, bien que l'Afrique soit encore relativement épargnée à cet égard. La varroase , toutefois, qui s'étend rapidement depuis l'Asie du Sud-Est aux autres régions du globe, est une maladie dont il faut être conscient (voir le chapitre 6). Là où elle devient un problème sérieux, elle est en mesure de changer le visage de l'apiculture du tout au tout. Ceux qui souhaiteraient en savoir plus et se tenir au fait de la situation pourront consulter les magazines spécialisés en apiculture, les livres rédigés par des experts ou les nombreux sites Internet disponibles dans ce domaine.Tout le matériel décrit dans cet ouvrage est indispensable au travail apicole. De même il est possible de consulter des catalogues spécialisés qui proposent toutes sortes d'équipements supplémentaires, certains étant utiles pour une production de base et d'autres relevant plus du gadget pour apiculteur.Se plonger dans des livres et des magazines sur le sujet constitue certes une bonne base de départ, mais aller au-devant d'autres apiculteurs pour les observer à l'oeuvre et discuter avec eux reste la meilleure école. C'est la main bien guidée qui fait le bon artisan. Après avoir lu ce livre, ceux qui l'auront trouvé utile pourront toujours rechercher d'autres ouvrages et magazines pour en extraire toutes les informations pertinentes spécifiques à leur travail.Les abeilles se répartissent en deux grandes catégories : les espèces sociales d'une part et les espèces solitaire s d'autre part. Les abeilles sociales vivent en groupe au sein de colonies ; la plus connue est l'abeille domestique, Apis mellifera , également appelée abeille mellifique. Plusieurs autres espèces produisent du miel, et notamment de très petites abeilles sans aiguillon dont les plus communes sont, en Afrique, les trigones (Trigona spp.) et les mélipones (Melipona spp.). Ces abeilles sans aiguillon, qui se trouvent surtout dans les régions à climat chaud, occupent des fissures dans des arbres ou des bâtiments, et souvent des trous dans le sol. Elles élaborent un miel aqueux, savoureux et très recherché à des fins médicinales, qu'elles stockent en quantité limitée dans de petites outres de cire construites côte à côte (figure 1). D'autres espèces d'abeilles mènent une existence semi-sociale ou Il n'existe pas d'Apis mellifera indigène dans les régions pacifique et caraïbe, mais des abeilles provenant de lignées européennes y ont été importées.L'abeille domestique se présente sous l'aspect typique d'un insecte et comporte une tête, un thorax et un abdomen. Elle a six pattes, quatre ailes, deux gros yeux composés et trois yeux simples, également appelés ocelles ou stemmates. Son développement, comme chez la plupart des insectes, passe par les stades successifs d'oeuf, de larve et de nymphe avant de parvenir au stade adulte.Il existe trois castes d'abeilles (figure 2) : la reine (femelle), les ouvrière s (femelles dont le développement est incomplet) et les faux bourdons (mâles). La reine est la seule femelle parvenue à son complet développement, et donc la seule à pondre des oeufs. Elle sécrète des phérormones (connues sous le nom de substance royale), qui attirent les ouvrières, ce qui permet de la localiser, et contribuent à préserver la cohésion de la colonie. Chaque ruche ne comporte normalement qu'une seule reine, mais il arrive parfois, lorsque la reine vieillit, que les abeilles en élèvent une seconde, qui vit alors pacifiquement à ses côtés jusqu'à ce qu'elle meure. Ce processus est appelé la « supercédure ».Les ouvrières assurent toutes les tâches de la colonie. Pendant les premières semaines de leur existence, elles demeurent à l'intérieur de la ruche et se consacrent aux activités « domestiques », notamment : l'alimentation des larves ; le nettoyage de la ruche ;-- la construction des rayons en secrétant de la cire par quatre paires de glandes abdominales ; la défense de la ruche ; les soins à la reine ; la réception du nectar apporté par les ouvrières travaillant à l'extérieur ; la conversion du nectar en miel et sa mise en réserve dans les rayons à miel ; l'operculage et le scellement à la cire des cellules lorsque le miel est mûr ; la mise en réserve du pollen ; la ventilation de la ruche pour maintenir une température et une humidité adéquates.Ces tâches se succèdent dans l'ordre strict imposé par le développement glandulaire. La dernière tâche « domestique » est la ventilation , qui permet aussi de renforcer les ailes avant la phase de butinage. En effet, les abeilles de la ruche qui atteignent un certain âge deviennent des butineuse s, qui sortent de la ruche pour rechercher le nectar, le pollen, l'eau et la propolis.Les faux bourdons sont les mâles de la colonie. Ils se développent à partir d'oeufs non fécondés et sont un peu plus grands que les abeilles ouvrières. Ils peuvent se compter par plusieurs centaines dans une seule ruche. Contrairement aux ouvrières, les faux bourdons peuvent aller et venir d'une ruche à une autre. Leur seule fonction est de s'accoupler avec une reine vierge. Les reines quittent la ruche à une ou deux reprises au tout début de leur existence pour s'accoupler avec un ou plusieurs faux bourdons, puis restent fertiles jusqu'à leur mort. Il arrive parfois, rarement, qu'une reine en fin de vie se trouve à court de semence mâle et se mette à pondre uniquement des oeufs non fécondés, mâles. Ces reines sont alors dites bourdonneuses, et leur colonie est condamnée à disparaître, dans la mesure où elles sont incapables d'engendrer de nouvelles ouvrières.Les colonies d'abeilles se développent progressivement, une grosse colonie pouvant comporter entre 50 000 et 60 000 individus, parfois plus. Lorsqu'une colonie atteint une certaine taille ou lorsqu'elle est surpeuplée, elle se reproduit par essaimage . L'essaimage survient --------pendant l'élevage des larves de plusieurs nouvelles reines à partir de cellules spéciales du nid à couvain appelées cellules royales. Une fois ces dernières operculées, la vieille reine quitte la ruche, accompagnée d'un essaim de 10 000 à 12 000 ouvrières, pour fonder ailleurs une nouvelle colonie. L'essaim se pose habituellement sur une branche d'arbre en formant un amas dense, puis des abeilles éclaireuse s partent pour rechercher un lieu propice à l'installation de la nouvelle colonie : arbre creux, fente dans un rocher ou ruche construite par l'homme. Lorsque l'essaim a choisi le site à coloniser, il s'y installe et les abeilles commencent immédiatement à construire de nouveaux rayons.Si la colonie d'origine est de grande taille, il arrive que d'autres essaims plus petits quittent la ruche à la suite du premier, chacun autour d'une ou de plusieurs reines vierges tout juste émergées. Une fois que la colonie, devenue moins nombreuse, « décide » de ne plus expulser d'essaim, une des reines vierges tue toutes les larves de reine qui subsistent. Si elle rencontre une autre reine vierge, elles se battent jusqu'à ce que l'une meure. La reine survivante quitte alors momentanément la colonie pour s'accoupler avec un ou plusieurs faux bourdons d'autres colonies, qu'elle va rejoindre dans des lieux de rassemblement de mâles, appelés « nuages de mâles ». Une fois qu'elle s'est accouplée, la reine revient à sa ruche et ne s'accouple jamais plus. La reine peut pondre des oeufs fécondés (oeufs d'ouvrières) ou non fécondés (oeufs de faux bourdons) en fonction des besoins de la colonie et selon la zone de la ruche où elle se trouve, dans une zone de cellules ordinaires d'ouvrières ou dans une zone de cellules, légèrement plus grandes, de faux bourdons.Lorsque la colonie a besoin d'une nouvelle reine, les abeilles construisent de une à vingt cellules d'aspect particulier, de grande taille, souvent au bord d'un rayon. Les oeufs fécondés qui y sont pondus par la vieille reine reçoivent alors une nourriture particulière et deviennent des reines.Si la reine est enlevée par l'apiculteur ou meurt subitement, les abeilles sélectionnent une larve d'ouvrière de moins de trois jours et convertissent sa cellule en cellule royale . Elles nourrissent alors cette larve avec une sécrétion glandulaire nommée gelée royale, et obtiennent ainsi une nouvelle reine.Les abeilles édifient les rayons parallèlement les uns aux autres en laissant entre eux un espacement régulier. Cet espacement est de 32 mm environ entre les axes, chez les races sauvages africaines , et de 38 mm environ chez les races européennes. Comme les abeilles respectent cette équidistance, il est possible de fabriquer des ruches dans lesquelles les rayons peuvent être retirés un par un, permettant à l'apiculteur de les inspecter ou de les enlever. Dès que les abeilles commencent à édifier le premier rayon, la reine commence à pondre dans les nouvelles cellules, alors que d'autres abeilles sortent chercher du nectar pour nourrir l'ensemble des adultes. Au fur et à mesure des éclosions, elles poursuivent leur quête de nectar et de pollen pour le couvain.Après trois jours, les oeufs éclosent et de minuscules larves en sortent, qui sont alors nourries de gelée royale pendant trois jours par des ouvrières nourrice s . Par la suite, leur régime alimentaire change et les larves reçoivent un mélange de pollen et de miel. Sept à huit jours après la ponte, les ouvrières scellent les cellules avec un opercule de cire et les larves se transforment en nymphes. Chez les abeilles africaines, l'adulte émerge de 19 à 20 jours après la ponte. Le développement des races européennes prend environ un jour de plus.Les reines émergent quant à elles seulement 15 à 16 jours après la ponte, tandis qu'à l'inverse le développement des faux bourdons s'étale sur 24 jours. Au fur et à mesure que la colonie grossit, les ouvrières construisent des rayons pour augmenter la taille du nid à couvain, puis construisent autour de celui-ci des rayons supplémentaires dans lesquels elles mettent du miel et du pollen en réserve.Le développement de la colonie dépend de la nature et du dynamisme des abeilles elles-mêmes, mais aussi des conditions météorologiques et de la floraison des plantes alentour. Si les abeilles sont travailleuses et si le temps est favorable, la colonie grandit assez rapidement. Dans des conditions idéales, une nouvelle colonie peut se développer et produire du miel dès la première saison, mais souvent ce n'est qu'au cours de la deuxième année qu'une colonie commence à produire un surplus de miel suffisant pour être récolté.Lorsque les abeilles rapportent le nectar des fleurs à la ruche, elles y ajoutent une enzyme, l'invertase , qui scinde le saccharose en lévulose et en dextrose . Par ailleurs, en ventilant la ruche avec leurs ailes, les abeilles créent des courants d'air qui évaporent l'eau du nectar, réduisant sa teneur de 80 % à 17 % environ. Lorsque le miel est mûr, il est scellé dans chaque cellule par un opercule de cire.Dans des conditions naturelles, les abeilles stockent le pollen dans les rayons situés immédiatement au-dessus ou à côté de la zone du couvain. Le miel est mis en réserve séparément, dans des rayons placés au-dessus des rayons à pollen et un peu plus loin du nid à couvain et de l'entrée de la ruche. Le miel et le pollen sont généralement mis en réserve dans des cellules d'ouvrières, les plus petites, mais il arrive que du miel soit également entreposé dans les cellules, plus grandes, des faux bourdons. Les abeilles recouvrent parfois les cellules remplies de pollen par une couche de miel ; ces cellules sont ensuite soit laissées ouvertes soit operculées.La conformation de la ruche détermine l'organisation du stockage du miel. Les abeilles commencent toujours par le rayon à couvain , puis construisent les rayons à miel là où l'espace est disponible. S'il y a de la place au-dessus du nid à couvain, comme dans les ruches à hausse s (extensions placées au-dessus de la zone du couvain), les abeilles y construisent leurs rayons à miel. Sinon, comme dans une ruche horizontale , elles construisent les rayons à miel sur les côtés, de part et d'autre du nid à couvain.Il semble que les abeilles n'aient pas vraiment de préférence en la matière, et les colonie s sauvages organisent leurs rayons de mille façons différentes. En subdivisant la ruche en plusieurs parties, les apiculteurs peuvent faire en sorte de récolter le miel sans trop déranger la colonie.Les abeilles adaptent leurs activités d'élevage du couvain en fonction des saisons et des ressources de miellée disponibles. Lorsqu'il n'y a pas de plantes en fleur ou que le temps est froid, les abeilles réduisent leurs activités à l'extérieur de la ruche. Il arrive que l'élevage du couvain s'interrompe complètement lorsque les conditions météorologiques sont défavorables. Les abeilles apprennent à quelle saison et à quel moment de la journée les différentes espèces de plantes produisent le plus de nectar . Aussi sont-elles parfois plus actives sur certaines espèces de fleurs tôt le matin et sur d'autres à midi ou le soir. Dans les régions à climat très chaud, elles tendent à ne sortir qu'aux heures les plus fraîches.Les abeilles emploient un système de communication perfectionné. Les ouvrières peuvent attirer l'attention de leurs congénères en exposant leur glande de Nassonov , située sur la face supérieure de leur abdomen, et en battant des ailes de manière à disperser autour d'elles une molécule odorante attractive (figure 3).De la même façon, les abeilles attirent leurs congénères vers l'entrée d'une nouvelle ruche au moment de l'essaimage. Les abeilles peuvent en outre diffuser des phérormones d'alerte en exposant leur aiguillon.Les butineuses communiquent également par des « danse s », au cours desquelles elles se déplacent d'une manière codifiée sur les rayons. Lorsqu'elles trouvent une source intéressante de nectar, de pollen ou d'eau, elles peuvent ainsi informer les autres abeilles de sa position précise par rapport à celle du soleil. Les abeilles éclaireuse s dansent parfois à la périphérie d'un essaim formé pour la recherche d'un nouveau site.Où pratiquer l'apiculture ?Les abeilles sont présentes, naturellement ou à la suite d'introduction par l'homme, sous pratiquement tous les climats , à l'exception des plus extrêmes. Tout milieu abritant un peu de végétation -y compris les zones urbaines -, est susceptible de les accueillir. Les cueilleurs ou « chasseurs » de miel sauvage des sociétés traditionnelles cherchent le miel auprès des colonie s d'abeilles sauvages occupant les cavités Les plantes produisent le plus de nectar lorsque le temps n'est ni trop froid ni trop chaud. Dans les régions à climat froid, les abeilles butinent donc par temps ensoleillé, tandis que, dans les régions chaudes, elles sortent surtout le soir et tôt le matin.Pour obtenir une bonne production de miel , il est indispensable qu'à certains moments il y ait des floraisons massives dans un rayon de 1 km autour de la ruche. Peu importe s'il y a également des périodes pendant lesquelles les fleurs sont rares. Les variations saisonnières régulières sont favorables à la conduite du rucher et à la production de miel. En effet, les régions caractérisées par des périodes sèches prolongées, entrecoupées de saisons de floraison nettement délimitées dans le temps, présentent souvent un meilleur potentiel que les régions à climat plus uniforme, où les floraisons sont plus étalées.Les milieux à végétation clairsemée ont souvent des rendements supérieurs à ceux cultivés de manière intensive, surtout lorsqu'ils présentent une flore riche en plantes mellifères dont les floraisons sont nettement saisonnières. Les savanes arborées sèches de type miombo de Tanzanie, de Zambie et d'Afrique du Sud, dominées par les espèces ligneuses Brachystegia et Julbernardia , sont ainsi des habitats à fort potentiel mellifère. Les zones boisées et les milieux à Acacia de l'arrière-côte kenyane et de la province de l'Est sont également excellents pour l'apiculture. Les savanes arborées des régions subsahariennes donnent aussi des rendements très satisfaisants, de même que la plupart des régions de la ceinture subsaharienne d'Afrique de l'Ouest.Bien qu'en région tropicale les rendements puissent s'avérer parfaitement corrects, les régions les plus productives du monde se trouvent en zone tempérée, où les abeilles disposent de longues journées et d'une abondance de plantes mellifères . C'est aussi dans ces régions que l'on peut le plus facilement avoir accès à l'expertise et à d'autres ressources utiles, réunissant ainsi les meilleures conditions pour la production de miel à grande échelle .Les lignées d'abeilles qui sont à la fois rustiques et laborieuses sont celles qui produisent les meilleurs résultats. Les abeilles africaines sont connues pour leur caractère agressif et il est beaucoup plus difficile de travailler avec elles qu'avec des abeilles d'origine européenne . Toutefois, on observe une grande variabilité entre colonies africaines, et même au sein d'un même rucher. Les colonies de grande taille tendent, sous climat chaud, à être plus agressives, tandis que des colonies plus petites, vivant dans des conditions relativement fraîches, peuvent s'avérer assez dociles. Il semblerait, au vu de certaines observations, que les colonies soient devenues plus agressives, les plus dociles ayant la plus forte probabilité d'être détruites par l'homme ou l'animal à la recherche de miel.Trois points sont essentiels à une bonne pratique apicole : assurer à la colonie suffisamment d'espace pour qu'elle puisse élever le couvain et stocker le miel, sélectionner et faire se reproduire des lignées à haut rendement, et protéger les abeilles des ravageurs et des maladies. Ces différents sujets seront traités plus en détail dans les chapitres 4, 5 et 6. L'apiculture sous les tropiques est une activité bien adaptée à l'agriculture familiale, et ce, à plusieurs titres : les abeilles sont plus productives lorsque les ruches ne sont pas trop nombreuses, les meilleurs résultats étant obtenus avec des ruchers de 10 à 20 ruches environ (figure 4), chaque rucher se trouvant à 2 km au moins des autres ruchers -bien que cette distance puisse être diminuée -si les ruchers comportent moins de ruches. L'apiculteur doit toujours avoir à l'esprit que la présence de colonies sauvages est vraisemblable. Dans les zones où les ressources de miellée sont particulièrement abondantes, le nombre de ruches peut être plus élevé ; le capital nécessaire et les coût s de fonctionnement sont relativement modestes. Des ruches simples peuvent être fabriquées par l'apiculteur lui-même ou par un artisan du village à l'aide de matériaux divers, peu onéreux et disponibles sur place. L'apiculture exige surtout du temps, une ressource encore relativement bon marché ; les abeilles ne constituent pas une charge supplémentaire pour la terre ;par leur activité pollinisatrice, les abeilles améliorent les rendements de beaucoup de cultures ; les abeilles diversifient les revenus tirés d'une exploitation agricole mixte ; le fermier ne dépend pas d'une seule et unique production ; lorsqu'ils sont correctement préparés, les produits issus de l'apiculture se conservent parfaitement pendant des années, jusqu'à ce qu'ils soient consommés ou vendus. À l'inverse, les entreprises apicoles de grande dimension, bien qu'envisageables par endroits, rencontrent un succès mitigé dans les régions Toutefois, si ces diverses contraintes peuvent être surmontées, les entreprises apicoles peuvent réaliser des profits et même présenter un potentiel de développement considérable dans les régions tropicales et subtropicales.On entretient des ruches par plaisir, pour le profit ou pour la recherche, mais quelle qu'en soit la raison, l'apiculture est, ou devrait être, réservée aux passionnés. Tout le monde ne ressent pas de l'intérêt , du désir ou une affinité particulière pour le travail au contact des abeilles. Les agriculteurs devraient néanmoins être encouragés à acquérir une certaine connaissance de l'apiculture et de ses potentialités en matière de pollinisation des cultures et de production de miel et de cire. L'apiculture ne convient pas à ceux et celles qui sont allergiques aux piqûres d'abeille, car tous les apiculteurs se font inévitablement piquer de temps à autre.Traditionnellement, les apiculteurs acquièrent leur savoir-faire au contact de parents ou de voisins, mais c'est surtout par la motivation et l'expérience personnelle que l'expertise se forge. Les progrès récents des technologies de l'information ont rendu l'accès aux connaissances beaucoup plus facile. La qualité de ces conseils est toutefois variable. Le mieux est souvent de s'adresser à un apiculteur de la région qui obtient de bons résultats. Des livres tels que celui-ci s'avèrent également utiles ! Des cours d'apiculture sont parfois dispensés par les institutions en charge de l'apiculture, de l'agriculture ou des forêts. Des renseignements plus précis à ce sujet peuvent être obtenus sur place ou auprès ----de Bees for Development (Abeilles pour le développement) ou de l'International Bee Research Association (Association internationale pour la recherche sur les abeilles). Les meilleures formations sont celles qui proposent beaucoup de travaux pratiques. De bonnes notes de cours, des brochures et des livres seront très utiles pour s'assurer qu'une formation est adaptée à l'aspirant apiculteur. Une base théorique solide pourra aider ce dernier à comprendre et à appliquer les principes, mais « c'est en forgeant qu'on devient forgeron ». Un cours qui explique les raisons sous-jacentes et l'importance du mode de construction particulier d'une ruche à barrettes kenyane s'avérera plus utile qu'une exposition détaillée de l'anatomie de l'abeille, qui pourra être étudiée dans un livre. Pour la formation des conseillers en apiculture, il est également tout aussi important de s'assurer que l'instructeur a une bonne expérience pratique de l'apiculture.En Afrique, les personnes qui s'occupent d'abeilles et de miel sont traditionnellement des hommes adultes. Cela se justifie lorsque les ruches sont éloignées de l'habitation et que les techniques de récolte exigent de grimper dans des arbres et de se débarrasser de ses vêtements. Mais dès lors que le rucher est situé plus près de la maison, que les ruches sont bien conçues et que l'on porte des vêtements de protection, l'apiculture peut aussi bien être pratiquée par des femmes ou des adolescents. La plupart des femmes africaines ont suffisamment de force pour porter du miel, y compris dans des hausses, exactement comme elles le font pour le bois de feu et l'eau. Le miel qu'elles produisent les aide à nourrir leur famille ou à générer un revenu. Les femmes peuvent apprendre aussi bien que les hommes auprès d'apiculteurs expérimentés, mais, dans certaines sociétés, il s'avère plus judicieux d'organiser des formations qui leur soient réservées.Les apiculteurs, hommes ou femmes, doivent porter un vêtement approprié. Des pantalons longs avec une chemise épaisse et un voile, des gants et des chaussures peuvent offrir une certaine protection contre les piqûre s, mais ce n'est pas le cas d'une robe, d'un boubou ou d'un tissu léger en coton. Il est beaucoup plus efficace de porter une salopette ou un bleu de travail suffisamment large, passé par-dessus des vêtements ordinaires.Pour faire du miel, les abeilles ont besoin d'une certaine diversité de plantes cultivées ou spontanées -arbres, arbustes et plantes annuelles -produisant des fleurs à nectar. Une liste d'arbres, d'arbustes et d'autres plantes attirant les abeilles domestiques est présentée dans le tableau 1. Cependant, certains facteurs géographiques peuvent intervenir et faire en sorte qu'une espèce intéressante dans une région ne l'est plus dans une autre.Les espèces suivantes présentent un intérêt minime pour les abeilles : le cyprès, la bougainvillée, l'acacia de Mearns ou acacia noir, l'acacia doré, le lantanier, le pyrèthre, les théiers.Tableau 1. Les plantes utiles en apiculture. Les ruches : principes généraux Une ruche est un abri destiné à accueillir convenablement une colonie d'abeilles. Une ruche bien conçue doit protéger ses occupants des conditions météorologiques défavorables et des ravageurs, et permettre que le miel soit récolté avec le minimum de dérangement. Elle facilite le suivi des colonies et la récolte du miel, et permet donc à l'apiculteur d'obtenir les meilleurs rendements en produits apicoles, par rapport à la quantité de travail et au capital qu'il y a investis. Toute ruche appartient à l'une ou l'autre des trois catégories suivantes, en version simple ou composée : les ruches à rayons fixes ou ruches fixes ; les ruches à rayons mobiles ; les ruches à cadres mobiles.Les ruches simples ne comprennent qu'une seule « pièce », dans laquelle les abeilles installent leur nid à couvain et leurs réserves de miel, en général dans des endroits différents. Le couvain est le coeur de la colonie. C'est là que la reine se trouve, que les oeufs sont pondus, et que les larves sont élevées jusqu'au stade adulte. Le pollen est stocké autour du nid à couvain, et le miel de chaque côté ou au-dessus. Les ruches composées comportent plusieurs sous-unités distinctes, dont certaines sont réservées au couvain et d'autres au miel. Une grille à reine est souvent insérée entre les parties dévolues au couvain (le corps de ruche ) et celles consacrées au miel (en général appelées hausses), afin d'empêcher la reine d'aller pondre ailleurs que dans l'espace qui lui est alloué. La grille à reine est un écran en métal ou en plastique qui laisse passer les ouvrières mais retient la reine, dont le thorax est plus volumineux. Elle exclut également le passage des faux bourdons, qui sont eux aussi plus grands que les ouvrières. On équipe parfois des ruches simples avec une grille à reine pour subdiviser l'espace unique en plusieurs secteurs destinés au couvain ou au miel. Toute grille dont les mailles font un peu plus de 6 mm, le coffee tray mesh en Afrique de l'Est par exemple, peut être utilisée en lieu et place des grilles à reine vendues comme telles dans le commerce.La conception des ruches fait souvent appel à la notion de « passage d'abeille ». Il s'agit d'un espace de la taille d'une abeille (soit de 6 à 10 mm), permettant tout juste le passage d'un individu. Les abeilles ne condamnent jamais un espace de cette dimension, tandis qu'elles colmatent généralement toutes les fissures et ouvertures plus petites avec de la propolis pour empêcher les ravageurs éventuels (tels que les coléoptères et les fausses teignes) de s'y cacher. Elles utilisent la propolis non seulement pour boucher et sceller toutes les petites cavités et fentes présentes dans la ruche, mais également pour réduire la taille de l'entrée, le cas échéant.Les ruches à cadres mobiles exploitent ce principe de passage d'abeille. Tant que ces ruches sont réalisées avec précision, les abeilles n'attachent pas le bord des cadres aux parois de la ruche et l'apiculteur peut facilement les retirer. Si l'espace laissé autour des cadres est trop large, les abeilles sont susceptibles de le remplir en y construisant des rayons supplémentaires appelés « fausses constructions ». À l'inverse, si cet espace est trop étroit, le cadre peut être collé aux parois de la ruche par de la propolis. Dans un cas comme dans l'autre, il est plus difficile de retirer les cadres et les rayons de la ruche.L'apiculteur doit donc bien réfléchir au type de ruche adapté à sa situation. Un équipement apicole de pointe n'est pas forcément le plus rentable : un tel système demande beaucoup de matériel, de savoir-faire et d'attention, et le projet est susceptible d'échouer si l'un ou l'autre est déficient. Les modèles de ruches plus simples sont souvent amortis en une ou deux saisons de production, et si par hasard une ruche doit rester vide pour une raison ou une autre, le manque à gagner est sans grande conséquence. Mieux vaut souvent commencer avec des ruches de conception et de coût plus modestes et attendre qu'elles fassent leurs preuves, avant d'envisager une installation plus sophistiquée. Toutefois, si d'autres apiculteurs utilisent avec succès des ruches à cadres mobiles dans la même région, il peut s'avérer intéressant de suivre leur exemple -sans oublier toutefois que des conseils mal avisés et un matériel inapproprié peuvent accabler un apiculteur de dettes inutiles. Le tableau 2 propose les types de ruches qui correspondent le mieux aux ressources disponibles et aux objectifs de production.Le choix des ruches n'influence pas en soi la quantité de miel produite tant que la ruche est suffisamment spacieuse. L'objectif de la construction est de rendre aisé la conduite des colonies. Les ruches à cadres mobiles sont les plus modernes et les plus utilisées dans les grandes exploitations apicoles commerciales du monde entier. Mais elles ne sont pas forcément les mieux adaptées aux conditions qui prévalent dans les pays en voie de développement, où elles sont, de surcroît, souvent chères et difficiles à trouver. Il est important de prendre en compte le coût de la ruche et la facilité de production du miel qui dépendent de la disponibilité locale des matériaux nécessaires à son exploitation, l'objectif étant de maximiser la quantité de miel ou le revenu. Les tableaux 3 et 4 donnent quelques indications, certes très générales, mais susceptibles d'aider les aspirants apiculteurs à opter pour l'un ou l'autre des systèmes. Les ruches cylindriques sont le plus souvent installées dans la frondaison d'un arbre ou accrochées à une grosse branche par un bâton ou des fils de fer. Suspendre ainsi les ruches permet de leur garantir une certaine protection contre les ravageurs, notamment les termites, les fourmis et les ratels. En outre, dans les arbres, les ruches restent plus fraîches que près du sol -surtout quand il s'agit de sols sableux et en partie dénudés, irradiant beaucoup de chaleur. Lorsque les conditions environnementales sont plus humides, les ruches sont parfois posées sur des piquets fourchus plantés dans le sol.Ces ruches peuvent être fabriquées avec des matières premières très diverses, y compris des branches fines, du bambou, de l'herbe, des roseaux et des fibres de bananier (figures 9 et 10). Elles sont parfois recouvertes de feuilles, d'argile ou d'un mélange d'argile et de bouse de vache. Ces modèles sont particulièrement répandus dans le sud du Sahel, au Soudan et en Éthiopie.Les ruches cloches en paille traditionnelles d'Europe sont faites avec des tresses de paille (d'environ 2,5 cm de diamètre), liées par un autre matériau tel que des joncs refendus. Bien que ces ruches ne soient plus beaucoup utilisées sur leur continent d'origine, le modèle peut servir en zone tropicale. Les ruches cloches peuvent être fabriquées avec tout matériau convenant à ce type de vannerie, tel que des fibres de bananier, des feuilles de palmier ou des roseaux (figure 11). Les modèles de grande taille sont plus spacieux et permettent donc, en théorie, de produire plus de miel. Les meilleurs sont les modèles composés, également dits « à calotte », qui comportent un deuxième panier plus petit coiffant le premier à l'instar d'une hausse . Le miel ainsi mis en réserve dans cette hausse, encore appelée « grenier » ou « panier à miel », peut être récolté sans déranger le nid à couvain qui se trouve dans le corps de ruche. La simplicité et le faible coût des ruches cloches en fibre font de ce modèle l'un des plus intéressants pour les apiculteurs qui travaillent à petite échelle .Les ruches cloches composées comportent trois parties : le plateau , ou plancher, qui soutient le corps de ruche , en bois, en panneau de particules, en panneau de fibres comprimées ou tout autre matériau similaire ; le corps de ruche, la partie la plus importante, dans laquelle la colonie s'installe et élève le couvain. Il doit être assez spacieux pour que les abeilles puissent y bâtir un nid à couvain de bonne taille sans se --sentir à l'étroit. À titre indicatif, les dimensions internes devraient être d'environ 30 cm de profondeur sur 45 cm de diamètre. Le dessus doit être relativement plat et percé en son centre d'un orifice de 6 cm de diamètre. L'entrée de la ruche se trouve à la base du corps de ruche ; la hausse , une deuxième cloche dans laquelle les abeilles emmagasinent le miel (figure 12). Cette cloche, plus petite que le corps de ruche, est placée par-dessus ce dernier, une fois que les abeilles se sont installées et lorsque les perspectives de miellée sont bonnes. La hausse fait environ 15 cm de profondeur et 40 cm de diamètre, afin de pouvoir se poser de façon stable sur le corps de ruche.Beaucoup d'apiculteurs enfilent de solides baguettes dans leurs ruches cloches en fibre, de sorte que deux forment au angle droit avec deux autres. Lorsque les abeilles construisent leurs rayons de haut en bas, elles les arriment à ces baguettes, ce qui les renforce considérablement. Ces attaches sont particulièrement précieuses lorsque les ruches doivent être déplacées pour les transhumance s d'une ressource de miellée à une autre, comme souvent en Europe, ou pour être vendues au marché.En Afrique, où les races d'abeilles ne se prêtent pas facilement aux méthodes de conduite des ruches à cadres mobiles, les principes de la ruche cloche s'avèrent particulièrement appropriés. D'après Smith (2003), les ruches cloches en fibre « sont probablement les ruches simples les plus fonctionnelles jamais utilisées ».Comme toutes les ruches, les ruches cloches en fibre doivent être installées avec soin, éventuellement sur un socle spécial ou suspendues à une branche. Il est impératif de les protéger de la pluie pour éviter que le matériau constitutif ne pourrisse. Placer les ruches sous un abri à la hauteur du sol est une solution, mais cela les expose aux attaques des ravageurs. Les recouvrir d'une couche d'argile et de bouse de vache leur donne par ailleurs un peu plus de protection.Des ruches en argile ou en terre cuite ont été traditionnellement utilisées en Afrique du Nord et dans la région méditerranéenne. Certains Les ruches en argile peuvent être perfectionnées en utilisant les pots deux par deux, l'un constituant le corps de ruche et le second, un peu plus petit, la hausse. Le principe reste le même que pour toute ruche à hausse. La ruche d'Omdurman , défendue par King (1932), est une innovation africaine fondée sur une technique traditionnelle. Elle est peu connue mais bien conçue. L'idée s'inspire sans doute de la ruche cloche composée en paille, dont le modèle d'Omdurman conserve les trois parties : le plateau , le corps de ruche et la hausse (figure 13). Une ruche similaire peut être construite avec deux pots en terre superposés avec l'ouverture vers le bas, un trou percé dans le fond du pot inférieur (dans le « plafond » du corps de ruche) permettant la communication entre les deux. Ce type de ruche en argile est utilisé avec succès au Kenya. La « ruche tronc » réalisée en terre, préconisée par Maurice Chaudière (2005), permet aussi d'augmenter la capacité du corps de la ruche en disposant, sous la cloche initiale, des anneaux de terre cuite supplémentaires ; cela permet de démonter la pile d'anneaux ainsi constituée, pour la récolte du miel.La manière la plus facile et la plus efficace de fabriquer des ruches en terre est de recycler deux pots traditionnels en argile à ouverture large et plate, l'un étant posé à l'envers sur l'autre (figure 14). Le pot le plus grand sert de corps de ruche et le plus petit, moins profond, sert de hausse. Une planchette en bois, légèrement plus large que le grand pot, sépare les deux. Un trou de 60 mm de diamètre y est percé, et gardé fermé jusqu'à ce que la colonie se soit bien installée dans le pot inférieur. Un fil de fer solidement attaché au col de ce dernier permet de suspendre le tout à une branche. L'entrée de la ruche est constituée d'une dizaine de trous d'un peu moins de 1 cm de diamètre percés dans la base. Le second pot, la hausse, est posé à l'envers sur la planchette, soit au moment de l'installation, soit plus tard. Une fois la colonie bien installée, le trou dans la planchette est découvert pour que les abeilles puissent avoir accès à la hausse et y construire des rayons à miel (figure 15). Ces ruches doivent absolument être protégées du soleil.En Asie du Sud-Est, où il existe à l'état sauvage, le bambou est utilisé par les colonies d'abeilles sauvages, comme par les apiculteurs. Des ruches en bambou sont aussi employées à Madagascar. Une ruche peut être réalisée à partir d'un tronçon de gros bambou (si possible entre 10 et 15 cm de diamètre) comportant quatre entre-noeuds. Des trappes d'accès sont découpées dans la face inférieure (figure 16). Les deux entre-noeuds centraux sont regroupés en détruisant la cloison qui les sépare, pour constituer la partie de la ruche dévolue au couvain. Les entre-noeuds latéraux servent au stockage du miel. Les cloisons qui séparent la zone centrale des deux zones latérales peuvent être percées de trous de 6 à 10 mm de diamètre pour retenir la reine tout en laissant passer les ouvrières, à la manière d'une grille à reine « naturelle » (figure 17).Des ruches à rayons fixes modernes peuvent être réalisées en ciment, en panneaux manufacturés, en matière plastique ou à partir de récipients de natures diverses. Le ciment mérite d'être pris en considération dans les régions où ses composants sont faciles à obtenir, surtout lorsque les matériaux plus traditionnels sont rares. Les ruches en ciment peuvent s'inspirer des modèles en argile (figure 18) ou, si le fabricant en a le savoir-faire, être conçues pour fonctionner avec des barrettes. En renforçant le ciment avec un matériau fibreux, il devient possible de réaliser des parois plus fines et plus légères et de mouler la forme de la ruche sur un gabarit, ce qui exige toutefois une certaine compétence technique.Le ciment est un matériau souvent bon marché. Il est solide, dure longtemps et garantit un bon niveau de protection contre les ravageurs et les aléas météorologiques. Cependant, comme il se prête difficilement aux travaux de haute précision, ce matériau est plus adapté aux ruches à rayons fixes. Il reste que des ruches à barrettes simples ont été construites en ciment en Éthiopie, en Zambie et en Gambie (où elles ont été coulées dans un moule creusé dans le sol). En Inde, des ruches à cadres mobiles ont même été construites en ciment ; elles sont réputées plus durables et moins chères que leur équivalent en bois.Quelques types de panneaux artificiels ont été testés avec un succès mitigé. Le contreplaqué est intéressant mais ne résiste pas longtemps lorsqu'il est exposé aux intempéries. Le contreplaqué « qualité marine », épais, tend à être trop coûteux et le contreplaqué classique requiert une architecture assez compliquée pour le renforcer. Les panneaux comprimés, en fibres dures, sont souvent grignotés par les abeilles, à moins d'être très épais et donc onéreux. Les panneaux non 3. Le matériel apicole comprimés, en fibres tendres, sont de même facilement mis en pièces par les abeilles et ne résistent pas non plus aux intempéries. L'aggloméré (panneaux de particules) tend à se défaire lorsqu'il est exposé en plein air, et les abeilles finissent également par le ronger après un an ou deux. Les panneaux d'un seul bloc ne sont pas assez solides pour une utilisation à long terme, tandis que le polystyrène expansé (mousse de polystyrène) et autres assimilés ne résistent vraisemblablement pas longtemps aux abeilles. Il serait néanmoins intéressant de tester certains panneaux de carton rigide ou de fibres modernes, du moment que ces matériaux sont à la fois durables et non toxiques pour les abeilles. En Afrique australe, des apiculteurs ont utilisé avec quelque succès un matériau en plastique mince, souple, rappelant le carton ondulé (par exemple la ruche horizontale de Jackson, voir le site www. rupertshoney.co.za).Le plastique est un matériau bon marché doté d'un potentiel considérable dans le domaine de l'apiculture. On le trouve sous des formes de plus en plus diverses. Ainsi est-il possible de créer une ruche à rayons fixes avec un seau en plastique et un pot de fleur en terre cuite, ce dernier présentant une surface légèrement rugueuse sur laquelle les abeilles grimpent facilement. De même, une ruche à rayons fixes composée peut facilement être réalisée en superposant deux récipients en plastique séparés par une planchette (figure 19). Un trou d'environ 6 cm de diamètre permet aux abeilles de passer du corps de ruche dans la hausse, où elles accumulent le miel. Une entrée peut être ménagée dans la base de la partie inférieure, en perçant une dizaine de trous d'un peu moins de 1 cm de diamètre. Cependant, comme la matière plastique n'est pas poreuse, contrairement au bois et à l'argile, il est très important de percer suffisamment d'orifices pour que la ruche soit bien ventilée. Il vaut mieux percer trop de trous que pas assez, car les abeilles sont capables de reboucher ceux qu'elles estiment inutiles avec de la propolis. Les ouvrages retraçant l'histoire de l'apiculture mentionnent des ruches en paille surmontées de cloches en verre transparent. Les abeilles entreposent le miel dans ces bocaux, qui sont eux-mêmes protégés par un panier extérieur plus grand. Des bocaux en plastique transparent, voire des morceaux de tuyau de gros diamètre, pourraient trouver un emploi similaire.Des boîtes en bois , des cuvettes en étain et d'autres récipients d'origines diverses sont souvent convertis en ruches improvisées (figure 20). En effet, les colonies d'abeilles sauvages s'installent quelquefois dans de simples boîtes en carton abandonnées. Le principal avantage de ce type de ruche est leur très faible coût . Il faut tout de même s'assurer qu'elles sont assez solides pour supporter le poids d'une colonie bien établie, qui atteint facilement de 20 à 30 kg. Le carton ne convient pas vraiment car il se désagrège dès qu'il se mouille, finit généralement grignoté par les abeilles et n'est pas assez fort pour soutenir le poids d'une grosse colonie. D'autres types de récipient peuvent être transformés en ruche en les plaçant dans un endroit où des essaims Les ruches à rayons mobiles sont conçues pour que chaque rayon puisse être enlevé, examiné et replacé séparément. Le type de ruche à rayons mobiles le mieux connu et le plus utilisé est la ruche à barrettes . Dans ces ruches, les abeilles construisent leurs rayons accrochés à de petites barres (généralement en bois) mesurées pour accueillir chacune un seul rayon. Ce type de ruche dérive de la ruche à panier grecque, de conception ancienne mais encore utilisée en Grèce et ailleurs. La ruche à panier grecque présente des barres de bois rugueux, arrondies en dessous, posées en travers du panier. Celui-ci est protégé par un crépi de terre ou de bouse de vache et surmonté d'un toit en chaume. La ruche à panier grecque est installée au sol, sur un socle simple. L'astuce fonctionnelle de cette ruche tient au fait que ses parois s'évasent vers le haut. Cette inclinaison décourage les abeilles d'y souder les rayons, comme elles pourraient le faire si les parois étaient verticales. Un des inconvénients de la ruche grecque d'origine est que les barrettes sont de tailles différentes pour pouvoir s'adapter à la forme arrondie du panier, et qu'elles ne sont donc pas interchangeables. Nombre de modèles de ruches à barrettes ont été mis au point plus récemment pour l'Afrique. Elles varient en taille, en forme et en certains points de détail, mais les principes de base restent les mêmes. Comme dans le cas des ruches à rayons fixes, tout matériau résistant aux intempéries, suffisamment solide et bien accepté par les abeilles peut être employé pour construire la structure de la ruche. Les ruches à barrettes sont le plus souvent faites en bois, mais le ciment, l'argile, les briques en terre, la fibre de verre et les plaques de métal ont tous été utilisés. Des ruches en bois avec parois en roseaux ont été utilisées au Kenya, et des ruches en briques de terre en Zambie. Ces dernières sont toutefois relativement chères. Les matériaux artificiels, et surtout le plastique, le plastique ondulé et divers types de panneaux de La ruche devient alors vite surpeuplée et la colonie essaime, ce qui revient à une perte d'abeilles, sauf si les essaims sont recueillis dans de nouvelles ruches.La ruche à barrettes kenyane (figure 22) est une ruche horizontale , généralement en bois, conçue pour accueillir 28 barrettes de 48 cm de longueur. Les deux petits côtés de la ruche sont verticaux, mais les grands côtés présentent une pente de 60° environ, leurs bords supérieurs s'écartant l'un de l'autre. L'entrée de la ruche peut être indifféremment aménagée en bas d'un grand ou d'un petit côté. Lors de la découpe, les pièces formant les quatre côtés doivent avoir la même hauteur pour que, une fois la ruche montée, les deux extrémités soient légèrement plus hautes que les grands côtés inclinés. Cela permet de replacer le toit de la ruche sans écraser les abeilles qui seraient posées sur les barrettes. Les bords supérieurs des grands côtés ne doivent pas être aplanis mais au contraire laissés en biais afin que les barrettes reposent sur une arête (figure 23). De cette manière, il est plus facile de faire glisser plusieurs barrettes à la fois le long de la ruche. Qui plus est, moins d'abeilles seront accidentellement écrasées sur une arête que sur une surface plate. Il existe plusieurs types de ruches à barrettes à parois verticales au Botswana, certaines en bois, d'autres en carton enduit de bouse de vache ou en branches fines plâtrées d'argile et de bouse de vache. Au Cameroun, les apiculteurs ont construit des ruches ressemblant au modèle kenyan, mais légèrement plus grandes, avec des barrettes de 50 cm et des parois latérales presque verticales. Les barrettes sont en bois tandis que la ruche elle-même est faite en rachis de feuilles de palmier raphia, un matériau à la fois économique et durable (figure 24). Le raphia a également été employé en République démocratique du Congo, où des segments de rachis de raphia sont utilisés en guise de barrettes. Toutefois, les ruches en raphia, comme toutes les ruches en fibres naturelles, doivent être abritées de la pluie si on veut qu'elles durent plus que quelques saisons. Dans certaines régions, des ruches à barrettes en bois semblent avoir été mises au point indépendamment du modèle kenyan, comme aux Seychelles, ou comme la ruche David au Sénégal.Le plus important, dans une ruche à barrettes, ce sont les barrettes elles-mêmes. Elles doivent être réalisées avec soin, dans un bois de qualité et bien sec, afin de ne pas se déformer par la suite. Les bois durs, s'ils sont disponibles, sont plus durables que les bois tendres ou les résineux. Si le bois de camphrier et de cèdre conviennent malgré leur odeur forte, le bois de Oncoba welwitschii , connu sous le nom de kisani au Kenya, doit être évité, car il est réputé toxique pour les abeilles. Les barrettes doivent avoir une largeur de 32 mm pour les abeilles africaines et de 38 mm pour les abeilles européennes. Cette mesure correspond à l'intervalle que les abeilles utilisent naturellement lorsqu'elles bâtissent leurs rayons. Les barrettes ont généralement une épaisseur de 10 mm et une longueur de 48 cm, ce qui correspond à la longueur standard des têtes de cadres des ruches à cadres mobiles Dadant et Langstroth. L'intérêt d'adopter une longueur standardisée est de pouvoir utiliser ces barrettes dans toutes les ruches, y compris dans des ruches à cadres mobiles. La plupart des ruches à barrettes de modèle horizontal simple contiennent environ 28 barrettes. Une ruche Langstroth en contient 10 dans le corps de ruche et 10 dans chaque hausse . Plusieurs types de barrettes sont couramment utilisés (figure 25).Les abeilles sont encouragées à construire leurs rayons le long de la barrette sur une amorce en cire d'abeille (gaufrée ou non). Cette amorce de cire doit faire au moins 1 cm de largeur sur toute la longueur de la barrette. Elle est glissée dans un trait de scie de 2 mm de profondeur réalisé le long de la face inférieure de la barrette, et scellée de chaque côté, sur toute sa longueur, avec un filet de cire fondue (voir le chapitre 5). S'il n'est pas possible de se procurer des feuilles de cire, une fine languette de bois ou d'un autre matériau de 1 cm de longueur peut faire l'affaire. Des amorces peuvent également être réalisées avec du papier rigide ou du carton trempé dans de la cire fondue, mais les abeilles tendent à grignoter ces matériaux pendant les périodes de moindre activité.Ce type de barrette est facile à fabriquer et donne de bons résultats. Équiper les barrettes d'amorces en cire mérite que l'on y passe le temps nécessaire, car les rayons ont ainsi plus de chances d'être bien alignés. En outre, bien que les amorces utilisent une quantité non négligeable de cire, celle-ci n'est pas perdue.Certains apiculteurs préfèrent les barrettes en V . Les abeilles suivent en général assez bien l'arête du V, mais ces barrettes sont plus difficiles à fabriquer et, comme elles sont plus épaisses, nécessitent plus de bois. Un autre inconvénient est l'arrimage plus ou moins solide des rayons à l'arête du V : ceux-ci doivent être manipulés avec soin pour éviter les décollements. En revanche, les barrettes en V sont faciles à préparer ; l'arête est simplement enduite de cire, soit en y frottant un morceau de cire, soit en la trempant dans de la cire fondue.Il existe également des barrettes en bois équipées d'une petite saillie longitudinale en guise d'amorce. Ce modèle, difficile à réaliser, consomme aussi plus de bois. En outre, si l'amorce en bois est trop petite, les abeilles n'en tiennent pas compte : il en résulte des rayons construits en travers des barrettes, qui ne peuvent être retirés sans être cassés. Ce type de barrette est la première cause d'échec des ruches à barrettes.Il est également possible de se servir de barrettes de facture assez rudimentaire, à face inférieure arrondie, comme celles des anciennes ruches à panier grecques. Des barrettes rondes , constituées de tronçons de branches fines, ont été employées en Afrique du Sud. Les barrettes, régulièrement espacées, viennent se loger dans des encoches découpées dans une bande de métal fixée de chaque côté du corps de ruche. Le haut du casier a les mêmes dimensions qu'une ruche Langstroth et reçoit des hausses standards Langstroth, elles-mêmes équipées de cadres mobiles (voir Crane 1990 pour plus d'information). Lorsque des bâtons sont ainsi utilisés en guise de barrettes, l'axe de chacun doit être placé à 32 mm de celui de ses voisins, laissant un interstice entre eux pour le passage des abeilles. Une ruche ainsi aménagée est moins facile à gérer qu'une ruche avec des barrettes en bois découpé, parce que la reine peut aller dans la hausse, s'il y en a. Des segments de bambou pourraient trouver le même emploi.Les barrettes peuvent être encore perfectionnées en renforçant l'attache des rayons par des petites lamelles de bois glissées dans des trous percés dans la barrette à un angle de 45° environ. Bien que l'idée soit intéressante, ces renforcements ne devraient pas être nécessaires si les rayons sont manipulés avec soin. La figure 26 Les ruches composées ont l'avantage de maintenir séparés le miel et le couvain. Dans les bonnes régions apicoles, lorsqu'une hausse peut amasser jusqu'à 10 kg de miel en une seule saison, elles sont plus intéressantes que les ruches simples. Le miel peut être récolté en enlevant la hausse entière en une seule opération.L'auteur a mis au point une ruche à barrettes composée en adaptant une ruche Langstroth (Paterson, 1988). Cette ruche présente des hausses amovibles mais est plus facile à fabriquer qu'une ruche à cadres mobiles car elle n'exige pas le même degré de précision. Elle est réalisée aux mêmes dimensions qu'une ruche Langstroth, les cadres étant remplacés par des barrettes. Le corps de ruche fait 23 cm de hauteur, 35,5 cm de largeur intérieure (40,5 cm à l'extérieur) et 46 cm de longueur intérieure (51 cm à l'extérieur). Le plancher peut être solidaire du corps de ruche ou indépendant. Il est conseillé d'utiliser des hausses de 17 cm de hauteur, mais il est possible d'employer des hausses moins hautes. Le bord supérieur interne des petits côtés du corps de ruche et des hausses doit être feuilluré, c'est-à-dire découpé pour former un rebord intérieur de 12 mm de largeur sur 13 mm de profondeur (appelé feuillard ), sur lequel sont posées les barrettes. Cette ruche ne comporte ni couvre-cadres, ni grille à reine.Le corps de ruche, comme chaque hausse, accueille 10 barrettes, placées les unes contre les autres, sans interstices, mais en laissant un espace de part et d'autre de la série de dix, de manière à ce que les abeilles puissent passer entre les parois de la ruche et les barrettes les plus externes. Le tout agit ainsi un peu à la manière d'un couvre-cadres , les abeilles ne pouvant passer entre les barrettes serrées les unes contre les autres. Elles circulent dans la ruche -pour gagner l'étage supérieur ou pour patrouiller contre les fourmis et autres ravageurs -en passant de chaque côté des groupes de dix barrettes. Le haut de la ruche est recouvert d'un toit qui peut être constitué de tout matériau plat. Un toit en bois recouvert d'un revêtement imperméable est idéal.Lorsque ces dimensions sont soigneusement respectées, la ruche se trouve aux normes internationales et ses composants peuvent être utilisés dans d'autres ruches. Toutefois, la plupart de ces dimensions peuvent être adaptées en fonction des disponibilités locales en bois. Les dimensions les plus importantes sont celles des barrettes. Si une variation de ces dernières de quelques millimètres en largeur est acceptable, leur longueur doit rester la même pour toutes les ruches.Les ruches à cadres mobiles sont les plus évoluées et sont utilisées dans les grandes exploitations apicoles commerciales du monde entier. La première a été mise au point en 1851 par le révérend Langstroth . Un grand nombre de modèles différents existent aujourd'hui, mais la ruche Langstroth a fait ses preuves et demeure le modèle moderne le plus populaire au monde. La ruche Dadant est une autre ruche à cadres mobiles très appréciée, de conception américaine. Légèrement plus grande que la ruche Langstroth, sa manutention demande une certaine force. La ruche Smith , inventée en Grande-Bretagne par un apiculteur professionnel, est un autre type de ruche à cadres mobiles, de dimensions plus réduites.Tous ces modèles sont conçus pour recevoir des hausses, ce qui permet aux apiculteurs de moduler la taille de leurs ruches en fonction des conditions de l'environnement et de récolter le miel par hausse plutôt que par rayon. Certains apiculteurs préfèrent néanmoins les ruches horizontales simples, dont le manque de hauteur est compensé par un plus grand nombre de cadres -jusqu'à 28 au lieu des 10 habituellement trouvés dans chaque étage des ruches Langstroth. Les ruches à cadres mobiles horizontales sont plus intéressantes dans les régions où l'apiculteur s'attend à une production faible et récolte le miel par rayon plutôt que par hausse entière. Les ruches horizontales sont aussi plus faciles à exploiter pour les personnes qui n'ont pas la force de porter des hausses lourdes. Maurice Chaudière (2005) a ainsi conçu une ruche horizontale à deux reines, l'« Extensible », de manipulation facile, performante et simple. Elle permet notamment de lutter biologiquement contre la varroase (voir chapitre 6).Les ruches à cadres mobiles doivent absolument être réalisées avec la plus grande précision dans du bois de bonne qualité et bien sec. Elles sont conçues sur le principe du passage d'abeille , et les dimensions des différentes parties doivent être exactes pour que les cadres demeurent mobiles. Ces ruches sont donc relativement coûteuses, bien que l'arrivée sur le marché de matériaux artificiels soit peut-être en mesure de faire un peu baisser les prix.Les ruches à cadres mobiles comportent plusieurs parties (figure 28). Le plateau en forme la base et soutient le reste de la ruche. Le corps de ruche , posé sur le plateau , constitue le coeur de la colonie, dans lequel la reine demeure et pond les oeufs. Le corps de ruche contient habituellement 10 cadres suspendus par leurs oreilles, posées sur les feuillards découpés dans les deux extrémités du casier. Les abeilles construisent leurs rayons sur les cadres, en général à partir d'une feuille de cire gaufrée. La cire gaufrée vendue dans le commerce est faite en cire d'abeille moulée en feuilles, sur lesquelles sont imprimées les bases hexagonales des cellules. Les abeilles construisent leurs rayons en poursuivant avec de la cire l'édification des cellules ébauchées, jusqu'à ce qu'elles atteignent leur profondeur définitive. Il est courant de renforcer à l'intérieur du cadre les feuilles de cire gaufrée avec des fils de fer fins et solides. Posée sur le corps de ruche, une grille empêche la reine d'aller pondre dans les hausses, qui sont réservées au miel. Comme le corps de ruche, les hausses contiennent des cadres et des rayons dans lesquels les abeilles emmagasinent le miel.Lorsque l'apiculteur souhaite agrandir une ruche, il peut ajouter un second corps de ruche, si nécessaire, ou des hausses supplémentaires. La dernière hausse est recouverte d'un couvre-cadres faisant office de couvercle interne. La plupart des couvre-cadres comportent des trous pour que les abeilles puissent patrouiller au-dessus, contre le toit, et pour améliorer la ventilation de la ruche. Le toit recouvre l'ensemble et protège la ruche des pluies.Les ruches à cadres mobiles présentent plusieurs avantages. Elles permettent à l'apiculteur d'effectuer toute une série d'opérations sur les colonies, telles que l'élevage de reines, le contrôle de l'essaimage, la lutte contre les maladies et les inspections générales, toutes choses difficiles à mettre en oeuvre dans des ruches à rayons fixes. En outre, les rayons sont si fermement maintenus dans les cadres que la ruche entière peut être transportée sans dommage, si la colonie est vendue ou si son propriétaire pratique la transhumance. Le principal avantage des ruches à cadres mobiles réside toutefois dans l'extraction mécanisée du miel des rayons qui, une fois vidés, peuvent être remis dans les ruches pour une nouvelle production. Comme les abeilles dépensent beaucoup plus d'énergie pour sécréter de la cire et fabriquer des rayons que pour produire du miel, le fait de vider les rayons permet aux abeilles de se consacrer essentiellement à la production de miel. Il s'ensuit que les ruches à cadres mobiles peuvent, en théorie, produire des quantités bien plus importantes de miel que les autres modèles de ruches.Les ruches à cadres mobiles sont incontestablement performantes dans les régions à climat tempéré et dans les régions tropicales où des abeilles européennes ont été acclimatées, y compris dans les régions caraïbe et pacifique. Utilisées par des apiculteurs expérimentés, elles ont également rencontré un certain succès en Afrique, notamment dans les zones moins chaudes où la flore mellifère est abondante. Toutefois, de manière générale, leur intérêt y est moins avéré, et bien souvent les rendements obtenus ne justifient pas l'investissement financier et le supplément d'attention qu'elles exigent. Le problème principal est que le tempérament agressif des abeilles africaines se prête mal aux techniques de suivi des colonies qui vont généralement de pair avec les ruches à cadres mobiles. Par ailleurs, il est souvent difficile de faire faire des ruches à cadres mobiles avec le degré de précision requis.De plus, les rayons vides de miel après l'extraction sont vulnérables aux fausses teignes, qui posent beaucoup plus de problèmes sous les tro piques qu'en zone tempérée. En général, en région tropicale, les rayons sont immédiatement rendus aux colonies après l'extraction, pour qu'ils y soient protégés par les abeilles. Il arrive cependant qu'une colonie faible puisse ne plus être en mesure de défendre des rayons vides.Le recours aux ruches à cadres mobiles peut s'avérer positif lorsque les conditions suivantes sont réunies : la qualité et la précision de fabrication des ruches sont essentielles. Lorsque la réalisation d'une ruche à cadres mobiles laisse à désirer, les différentes parties constitutives s'emboîtent mal et les à-coups qui en résultent exaspèrent les abeilles ; l'apiculteur doit être en mesure de supporter l'investissement financier que représentent les ruches et le matériel complémentaire. S'il ne peut amortir ses frais en une ou deux saisons, l'apiculteur doit se tourner vers une option moins coûteuse ; la flore locale et le climat doivent permettre des rendements élevés. Si les conditions ne sont pas favorables, les abeilles ne seront pas capables de produire le surplus de miel espéré ; les connaissances et le savoir-faire acquis d'expérience sont toujours importants quel que soit le type d'apiculture pratiqué, mais le sont plus encore lorsqu'il s'agit de gérer des ruches à cadres mobiles, plus complexes que les autres ; la sécurité des ruchers est essentielle. Les vols de ruches peuvent empêcher toute activité apicole commerciale viable.La fumée a un effet calmant sur les abeilles. Lorsqu'elles perçoivent sa présence, elles se gorgent de miel pour se préparer à quitter la ruche, ce qui les alourdit et les rend apathiques. La fumée agit aussi sur les abeilles même s'il n'y a pas de miel à proximité. Un enfumoir est un appareil qui permet à l'apiculteur de produire des bouffées de fumée dans la ruche et aux alentours (figure 29). Il est constitué d'une chambre de combustion cylindrique en métal mince et d'un soufflet. Celui-ci souffle de l'air par un orifice dans la base de la chambre de combustion, ce qui pousse la fumée à s'échapper par le bec en forme d'entonnoir situé dans la partie supérieure. Un bon forgeron de village peut fabriquer un enfumoir à partir de tôle neuve ou de récupération, voire d'une boîte de conserve, de la moitié d'un ressort de matelas et du vinyle d'un vieux siège de voiture. Il est important de laisser un espace entre le soufflet et l'orifice par où l'air pénètre dans la chambre de combustion. En outre, le soufflet doit être assez petit pour pouvoir être actionné d'une seule main. Certains enfumoirs présentent une grille au fond de la chambre de combustion, ce qui augmente le coût de l'appareil sans être vraiment nécessaire. Les enfumoirs semblent même mieux fonctionner sans grille.Toute substance susceptible de se consumer lentement en produisant beaucoup de fumée peut faire un combustible acceptable pour l'enfumoir, à condition qu'il ne dégage pas, en brûlant, de substance Pour allumer l'enfumoir, il suffit d'introduire un peu de copeaux ou de feuilles au fond de la chambre de combustion et de les allumer avec une allumette tout en actionnant doucement le soufflet pour démarrer le feu. On peut également placer trois ou quatre petits morceaux de charbon incandescents au fond de la chambre à combustion et les recouvrir de combustible, méthode qu'un apiculteur expérimenté trouvera inutile. Un enfumoir allumé par le haut s'éteint rapidement.Dès que l'on obtient une bonne flamme vive, on peut ajouter plus de combustible, petit à petit, jusqu'à remplir l'enfumoir en tassant juste assez pour ne pas éteindre le feu. Ce n'est que lorsque le feu est bien parti qu'une quantité beaucoup plus importante de combustible peut être ajoutée, en tassant bien cette fois, et que le couvercle peut être rabattu. La flamme s'éteint, mais le combustible continue de se consumer lentement en produisant une fumée dense. Le soufflet est actionné de temps en temps pour empêcher le feu couvant de s'éteindre.Il ne faut pas ouvrir une ruche avant que l'enfumoir soit bien allumé et produise une fumée abondante à volonté. Le feu doit être entretenu en permanence, car il est dangereux de le laisser s'éteindre pendant que l'on manipule une ruche. L'enfumoir produit normalement suffisamment de fumée pour durer le temps d'examiner deux ou trois ruches, mais il convient d'ajouter plus de combustible dès que la fumée devient moins abondante.Les ruches sur lesquelles on intervient doivent être approchées lentement et doucement, par derrière. L'apiculteur donne de la fumée tout autour de la ruche, y compris par devant et dans l'entrée. Le but de cette manoeuvre est de rendre la fumée perceptible aux abeilles. Une fumée froide et épaisse convient mieux qu'une fumée brûlante accompagnée de flammes. Il faut ensuite attendre une ou deux minutes avant d'ouvrir la ruche. Au moment de l'ouvrir, l'apiculteur donne 3. Le matériel apicole à nouveau de la fumée dans la ruche au niveau du point d'ouverture -ce geste doit être répété à chaque fois qu'il doit ouvrir la ruche à un nouvel endroit.Il n'est pas nécessaire d'émettre de très grandes quantités de fumée : ce n'est pas conseillé pour la santé des abeilles et un excès de fumée se ressent sur la qualité du miel. La quantité de fumée produite peut être réduite dès que les abeilles se calment. L'apiculteur l'apprend par expérience. Si les abeilles sont relativement calmes ou si la colonie est de petite taille, quelques bouffées données doucement le long du haut ou du bas des rayons suffiront. Une grosse colonie aura besoin de beaucoup de fumée et il sera important d'en laisser en permanence un peu en suspens au-dessus ou autour de la ruche. Les abeilles africaines exigent plus de fumée que les européennes. Si des abeilles sont écrasées par inadvertance ou tentent de piquer les vêtements, des bouffées supplémentaires doivent cibler ces points. Il est très important de bien enfumer l'entrée de la ruche. De vieilles ruches peuvent avoir plusieurs entrées, et il faut bien faire attention de les enfumer toutes à intervalle régulier. Sur une grosse colonie, il est conseillé d'intervenir à deux, une personne étant chargée d'actionner l'enfumoir pendant que l'autre effectue les opérations nécessaires.Les enfumoirs classiques utilisés par la plupart des apiculteurs occasionnent rarement des incendies, et les étincelles qui s'en échappent sont petites et s'éteignent rapidement. Il reste que ces appareils doivent être manipulés avec précaution. Les apiculteurs sont normalement des gens responsables qui font ce qu'il faut pour éviter de mettre le feu. Une fois qu'il a terminé de travailler sur ses ruches, l'apiculteur doit soigneusement vider les cendres de l'enfumoir et les éteindre. Sinon, en attendant, il peut en obturer le bec avec un petit paquet dense de feuilles ou d'herbes bien vertes et le poser dans un endroit sûr, où il ne risque pas de provoquer un incendie.Plusieurs substances peuvent être mêlées au combustible, mais comme leurs effets ne sont pas toujours prévisibles il est préférable de s'en abstenir. Il est ainsi possible d'ajouter certains champignons de type vesses (famille des Lycoperdacées ) pour calmer les abeilles, mais leur fumée peut devenir toxique (pour les abeilles et sans doute pour l'apiculteur) lorsque les quantités utilisées sont excessives. Le nitrate d'ammonium du commerce est parfois ajouté au combustible en petite quantité (1 cuiller à café de granulés par enfumoir, pour maîtriser des abeilles exceptionnellement agressives. Ce mélange produit une fumée épaisse contenant un gaz rappelant le gaz hilarant utilisé autrefois par les dentistes. Ce produit peut rendre les abeilles inconscientes s'il est employé en trop grande quantité. Comme il a des effets résiduels sur les abeilles et sur l'apiculteur, il vaut mieux éviter d'y avoir recours. Le salpêtre est réputé calmer les abeilles, mais doit également être évité du fait de ses propriétés cancérigènes. S'il intervient sur une ruche en utilisant un additif dans l'enfumoir, l'apiculteur doit aller vérifier l'état de la colonie le lendemain. Ainsi, il saura immédiatement que la substance a été nocive s'il aperçoit des abeilles mortes autour de l'entrée.Le lève-cadres est un outil métallique employé pour décoller et soulever, en faisant levier, le toit, les hausses et les barrettes ou têtes de cadres. L'extrémité légèrement affûtée est également utile pour nettoyer la ruche et enlever la propolis. Le lève-cadres peut éventuellement servir à couper les rayons, bien qu'un couteau soit ici plus approprié. Il peut être remplacé par un bon tournevis, mais l'outil véritable a une forme élargie mieux adaptée. Un forgeron compétent peut facilement faire un lève-cadres acceptable et bon marché à partir de métal de récupération, s'il dispose d'un dessin ou d'un exemplaire à copier (figure 30).Les apiculteurs traditionnels interviennent habituellement sur leurs ruches à la nuit tombée et peuvent s'occuper de leurs abeilles avec peu ou pas de vêtements protecteurs. Toutefois, le tempérament agressif des abeilles africaines fait qu'une protection est conseillée, surtout si l'on utilise des ruches et des méthodes de conduite plus modernes. Porter un voile, des gants, une combinaison et des chaussures adaptés permettra d'éviter les piqûres.Le dispositif de protection du visage peut être réalisé de plusieurs manières. Une première méthode consiste à prendre 1 m de moustiquaire en plastique (vert foncé ou noir) et 2 m de moustiquaire blanche en coton. Le morceau de moustiquaire en plastique sert à protéger la tête elle-même. Il est soit découpé en deux morceaux pliés en U et cousus ensemble, soit roulé en cylindre en préservant un fragment plus petit pour en fermer l'extrémité supérieure. Les coutures doivent être solides et soigneuses pour éviter qu'elles ne s'effilochent. La moustiquaire en coton est ensuite cousue au bas de ce « heaume » pour former une « jupe » de 50 cm à 1 m de longueur (figure 31), qui devra être glissée et serrée à l'intérieur de la combinaison. Ces types de voile sont portés par-dessus un chapeau en coton de type safari à large bord, ce qui permet d'écarter le voile du nez et des oreilles. Un autre moyen pour obtenir un voile efficace est de coudre la moustiquaire directement sur un chapeau de paille rigide à large bord (figure 32). Un rucher est un groupe de ruches. Le nombre optimal de ruches dans un rucher dépend de l'abondance des ressources locales de miellée. Dans la plupart des régions tropicales, la densité optimale est de l'ordre d'un rucher de 10 à 20 ruches tous les 2 à 3 km. Si les rendements sont décevants, l'apiculteur doit se demander si ses ruches ne sont pas trop nombreuses. Le rucher peut toutefois comporter un plus grand nombre de ruches lorsqu'il y a transhumance. Dans ce cas, l'apiculteur déplace ses ruches d'un site à un autre pour exploiter les ressources de miellée qui apparaissent ou pour polliniser successivement des cultures à différents endroits.Plusieurs facteurs doivent être pris en considération lors de la sélection du site d'installation d'un rucher : une relative sécurité contre les prédateurs naturels (tels que ratels et fourmis) et contre le vol et le vandalisme ; la proximité de fleurs produisant du nectar ; les abeilles détestant le bruit, certaines odeurs et le vent fort, le rucher doit se trouver dans un endroit calme et abrité. C'est une bonne idée de planter une haie vive ou des buissons, de préférence d'espèces mellifères, autour du rucher pour isoler un peu les abeilles des autres activités ; les abeilles peuvent présenter un danger ; aussi doit-on éviter d'installer les ruches trop près des lieux fréquentés, d'animaux attachés ou de volailles en cage (les animaux libres de leurs mouvements sont moins exposés car ils peuvent s'écarter) ; les ruches peuvent être exposées aux rayons du soleil levant ou couchant, mais en région tropicale il est nécessaire de les protéger du soleil aux heures les plus chaudes en les installant sous des arbres ou sous des abris (figure 34). L'ombrage est moins important à plus haute ). Le plancher de chaque ruche doit se trouver à environ 60 cm au-dessus du sol. Si les attaques de ratels sont à craindre, une fosse peut être creusée sous la ruche.Les ruches composées sont plus difficiles à suspendre de manière satisfaisante. Lorsque les ratels ne posent pas de problème, elles peuvent être installées sur un simple socle posé sur le sol, par exemple des moellons en béton ou un vieux bidon, surmonté d'une plaque de métal d'environ un mètre carré (figure 36), légèrement inclinée vers l'avant de manière à ce que l'eau de pluie s'écoule sans pénétrer dans l'entrée de la ruche. La plaque métallique empêche les termites de monter et rend plus difficiles les attaques des fourmis venant du sol. En outre, elle empêche les plantes de pousser trop près de la ruche. Si l'on ne peut se procurer de plaques de tôle, de l'huile de vidange peut être versée autour de la base de la ruche et sur le socle en béton pour éloigner ces insectes. On peut aussi utiliser un morceau de bâche en plastique, plus économique que le métal bien que plus fragile. Il ne doit pas y avoir de rebord ou de fissure sous la ruche susceptible d'abriter des prédateurs tels que des lézards. Les ruchers pavillons sont des bâtiments dans lesquels on installe les ruches afin de les protéger contre les éléments naturels, les prédateurs et les personnes mal intentionnées. Les abeilles accèdent à leur ruche par des orifices ménagés dans les murs. Celles qui s'échappent à l'intérieur du bâtiment en sortent par les fenêtres. Ces dernières sont équipées de deux moustiquaires, l'une à l'intérieur, qui ferme la partie supérieure de l'ouverture et l'autre à l'extérieur, qui en ferme la partie inférieure. Ces deux panneaux en moustiquaire se superposent sur environ 10 cm en laissant un espace de 1 cm entre eux, de manière à ce que les abeilles puissent grimper entre les deux et s'envoler à l'extérieur une fois parvenues en haut. Comme ces insectes marchent toujours vers le haut, ils ne pourront pas entrer à nouveau par la fenêtre. En outre, lorsque les abeilles s'échappent dans le bâtiment, au moment des interventions de l'apiculteur par exemple, elles tendent à voler vers la lumière et partent donc à l'extérieur. Il est un peu plus facile de travailler avec un rucher bâti parce que les abeilles les plus agressives, celles qui gardent l'entrée des ruches, restent à l'extérieur 4. La conduite générale du rucher pendant que l'apiculteur intervient sur les ruches dans le bâtiment. L'inconvénient de ces ruchers est qu'ils sont plus coûteux à construire et que leur sécurité dépend de la solidité du verrou de la porte. En Éthiopie, certains apiculteurs ont édifié à relativement peu de frais de robustes ruchers adossés à leur propre demeure, grâce à un système de clayonnage plâtré d'argile.Une ruche bien faite devrait durer de 10 à 20 ans, voire plus. Investir dans des ruches médiocres est un mauvais calcul, et il est plus économique à long terme de payer plus cher un matériel de qualité. La durée de vie de la ruche est en outre prolongée par un entretien régulier. L'extérieur devrait être protégé avec de la peinture, un enduit de polyuréthane ou un produit de protection des bois (par exemple de la créosote nature, sans adjuvant insecticide). Si les ruches sont faites d'un matériau périssable, comme de la fibre de bananier, elles dureront beaucoup plus longtemps si on les préserve du soleil et de la pluie. Les ruches doivent être inspectées et remises en état chaque fois qu'elles se trouvent inoccupées. Si une ruche occupée a besoin d'être réparée, les abeilles peuvent être momentanément transférées dans une ruche vide (voir ci-dessous).Il est important de maintenir le terrain dégagé autour des ruches, en coupant les mauvaises herbes et les branches pendantes. Cela permet d'offrir aux abeilles un couloir de vol bien ouvert, de restreindre les attaques des ravageurs et de prévenir l'excès d'humidité dans les ruches par temps pluvieux. Il est déconseillé de laisser traîner de vieux rayons aux alentours, car ils attirent les prédateurs et peuvent propager des maladies.Les colonies d'abeilles se reproduisent régulièrement en essaimant. Dans les environnements difficiles, elles peuvent en outre migrer assez souvent. Aussi la manière la plus facile d'obtenir de nouvelles colonies en région tropicale est-elle d'attirer un essaim sauvage. Une nouvelle ruche est préparée à cette fin en frottant ou en faisant fondre un peu de cire d'abeille à l'intérieur. S'il existe des produits attractifs vendus dans le commerce, certains apiculteurs utilisent des plantes spécifiques pour attirer les essaims, comme l'Ocimum kilimanjaricum (mukuri en swahili), à odeur prononcée, qui pousse dans les marais saisonniers. Ces végétaux sont tantôt frottés à l'intérieur de la ruche, tantôt attachés à l'extérieur. D'autres substances végétales sont également susceptibles d'attirer les essaims, par exemple la mangue verte coupée et frottée dans la ruche. Certains apiculteurs affirment que toute plante à odeur citronnée est attractive. Les déchets de la préparation de la cire (le marc de cire ) peuvent être bouillis dans de l'eau et appliqués au pinceau à l'intérieur de la ruche pour un effet similaire. Les api culteurs de la région de Tharaka, dans l'est du Kenya, attirent les essaims en enrobant un bâton de propolis additionnée de plantes particulières (connues sous les noms locaux de muthande et muletha) et en en frottant l'intérieur d'une ruche vide.Toute méthode traditionnelle efficace peut être utilisée pour encourager les abeilles à coloniser une ruche moderne. Le miel et le sucre ne sont pas indiqués, toutefois, car ils attirent surtout les abeilles butineuses et autres insectes, ce qui rend la ruche peu accueillante aux essaims. Les ruches doivent être maintenues propres et sèches parce que les abeilles n'aiment pas l'humidité et les moisissures. Celles qui ont déjà été occupées sont plus attractives que les neuves.Lorsqu'une colonie d'abeilles grossit et que la ruche devient surpeuplée, elle produit un ou plusieurs essaims de reproduction. Ceux-ci se posent en amas sur un buisson ou un arbre à proximité, puis, peu de temps après, ils s'envolent et se posent à nouveau sur un autre arbre. Des abeilles éclaireuses s'en échappent alors pour rechercher un site adéquat à coloniser. Il est possible de capturer un essaim en grappe et de l'introduire dans une ruche. Le meilleur moment pour le faire est en fin de journée, juste avant la nuit. Pendant la chaleur de la journée, les abeilles ont plus de chances de s'envoler et d'aller déranger d'autres personnes ou des animaux domestiques. Le matériel nécessaire pour capturer un essaim est le suivant : un panier rigide pour contenir l'essaim -les paniers du Burundi, avec leurs couvercles bien ajustés, sont parfaits, mais une boîte en carton peut faire l'affaire ; un vieux drap pour envelopper le panier une fois l'essaim capturé ; des vêtements de protection ; L'essaim est alors amené à la ruche que l'on a préalablement préparée en enlevant cinq des barrettes (ou des cadres mobiles), afin de ménager un espace pour l'essaim. Celui-ci est tout d'abord doucement enfumé à travers les parois du panier, puis les abeilles sont décrochées par une franche secousse. Le panier est ensuite renversé et secoué pour faire tomber toutes les abeilles dans la ruche. Dès que la plupart des abeilles sont à l'intérieur, les barrettes sont remises en place et la ruche est refermée. Les abeilles qui restent à l'extérieur finissent par rejoindre les autres en passant par l'entrée de la ruche.Une autre méthode, particulièrement intéressante à observer, consiste à « conduire » les abeilles vers la ruche qui leur est destinée. Un drap blanc est étalé devant la ruche et une planche en bois d'environ 50 cm de longueur y est placée, une de ses extrémités menant à l'entrée de la ruche. On fait alors tomber l'essaim sur le drap, devant l'autre extrémité de la planche, et on donne quelques bouffées de fumée pour pousser les abeilles à marcher vers la ruche. Il est parfois nécessaire de continuer à les enfumer, mais pas trop, pour qu'elles poursuivent leur ascension. Mais une fois que les abeilles se sont décidées, l'essaim peut se déplacer très rapidement. Il est souvent possible d'apercevoir la reine, immédiatement suivie du reste des abeilles. Une fois que ---toutes les abeilles sont dans la ruche, la planche et le drap peuvent être enlevés. Il y a plus de chances qu'une colonie reste dans la ruche lorsque les abeilles y ont été « conduite s » plutôt que « versées ».Les essaims récemment enruchés peuvent rester dans la ruche qui leur a été allouée ou au contraire déserter au cours des premiers jours. Il faut une certaine expérience pour créer les conditions optimales et parvenir à un taux de réussite acceptable. Les abeilles européennes désertent rarement, mais les abeilles africaines le font fréquemment lorsque quelque chose ne leur plaît pas. Ce peut être une odeur désagréable ou une température trop élevée dans la ruche. Les intrusions répétées de ravageurs entraînent parfois la désertion d'une ruche, mais une colonie forte est normalement capable de repousser les hôtes indésirables. Il reste que, une fois la colonie installée, elle ne repart pas sans avoir une bonne raison de le faire, comme un manque de fleurs, de réserves alimentaires ou d'eau.Une ruchette est une petite ruche à noyaux qui contient quatre ou cinq barrettes ou cadres mobiles. On l'utilise pour multiplier le nombre de colonies en capturant des essaims ou pour garder des colonies de côté pendant quelque temps. Un fil de fer attaché à l'extérieur permet de l'accrocher dans un arbre, ce qui permet de mieux attirer les essaims, plutôt qu'une ruche posée au sol. Toute ruchette neuve doit être préalablement appâtée avec de la cire, puis maintenue propre et fraîche par la suite. Une fois la ruchette colonisée, les abeilles y sont laissées au moins une semaine pour qu'elles s'y installent bien.Quand l'apiculteur veut utiliser cette colonie pour remplir une nouvelle ruche, il la déplace dans la soirée, quand les abeilles sont rentrées. L'entrée est obturée avec un volet ou un bouchon d'herbe et la ruchette est apportée à l'endroit où la ruche définitive sera installée. Le meilleur moment pour opérer est à la fin de la première semaine, ou après trois semaines lorsque les rayons sont encore légers et risquent le moins de se rompre (le premier couvain émerge environ trois semaines après l'établissement de la colonie). Plus tard encore, les vieux rayons deviennent plus solides, mais plus lourds. Une fois que la ruchette est sur son nouvel emplacement, l'entrée est ouverte et le tout est laissé en paix pour quelques jours.Une fois que les abeilles se sont familiarisées avec leur nouvelle situation, elles peuvent être transférées dans une vraie ruche. On Après quelques jours, juste avant le coucher du soleil, la ruche traditionnelle est copieusement enfumée et déposée au pied de son socle, si possible sur un drap blanc. La nouvelle ruche est alors installée à sa place. Une planche en bois est ensuite posée entre les deux ruches, formant un pont le long duquel les abeilles pourront monter vers leur nouvelle demeure. De la fumée est alors émise derrière l'ancienne ruche en direction de la nouvelle afin d'inciter les abeilles à marcher le long de la planche. On peut aussi encourager les abeilles à quitter leur ruche en tapotant ou en tambourinant dessus.On peut alors ouvrir l'ancienne ruche, en retirer les rayons un par un et les secouer pour en faire tomber les abeilles sur la planche, ou directement dans la nouvelle ruche. Deux ou trois vieux rayons solides avec du couvain non operculé sont alors attachés dans la nouvelle ruche. Ils peuvent être découpés droits pour être accolés sous une barrette, fixés à l'aide de fibres naturelles ou de bandes de papier journal jointes avec du ruban adhésif. Le plus facile est de les suspendre à l'aide d'une pince à dessin à travers laquelle on passe une baguette fine et solide (figure 39), ou encore de les attacher à une barrette avec du fil de fer. Tous les autres rayons doivent être jetés et la vieille ruche enlevée dès La règle est de toujours approcher les ruches par derrière pour éviter de croiser le couloir de vol des abeilles. Il faut ensuite bien enfumer celle sur laquelle on se propose d'intervenir avant de l'ouvrir (voir la section sur l'utilisation de l'enfumoir au chapitre 3), puis continuer à Il est possible que des abeilles s'agglutinent sur le voile ou sur le dos de l'apiculteur pendant qu'il travaille. Elles peuvent être décrochées en donnant une secousse au vêtement ou brossées avec une brosse à abeilles, une grande plume ou un bouquet de feuilles. Si les abeilles deviennent trop agressives, l'apiculteur doit terminer son intervention aussi rapidement que possible, fermer la ruche et quitter les lieux. En partant, il est conseillé de se glisser entre des buissons serrés et de changer de direction à chaque fois que l'on passe un arbre, ce qui déroute les abeilles et permet de les esquiver plus facilement.La reine ne devrait être touchée ou manipulée qu'en cas d'absolue nécessité, et l'apiculteur doit à tout moment prendre soin de ne pas l'écraser en déplaçant les rayons. Si elle doit être transférée, on peut l'inciter à monter sur le lève-cadres , une brindille ou une plume, d'où elle pourra être portée à destination. Si c'est absolument nécessaire, elle peut être saisie à main nue entre le pouce et l'index, doucement mais fermement, au niveau du thorax. Il faut s'abstenir de porter des gants pour ramasser une reine. On peut éventuellement la garder dans une boîte d'allumettes, peut-être avec d'autres abeilles, pour une durée limitée. On donnera alors un peu de fumée au moment de la réintroduire dans la ruche.Les meilleurs rendements en miel sont obtenus lorsque la colonie a le plus grand nombre d'abeilles butineuses au moment du pic de miellée.Il faut en outre que la ruche dispose d'un espace suffisant pour emmagasiner le miel. La conduite saisonnière du rucher vise à optimiser ces paramètres.Les miellée s correspondent aux moments de l'année où le plus de plantes sont en fleur. Dans les régions tropicales, on en compte normalement une ou deux par an. À ces périodes, les abeilles sont particulièrement actives pour récolter le nectar des fleurs, et c'est alors qu'elles mettent en réserve un surplus de miel. Le meilleur miel est obtenu à partir des rayons neufs, de couleur blanche . Certaines ruches plus âgées contiennent beaucoup de vieux rayons sombres. Cette teinte apparaît lorsqu'ils sont utilisés pour emmagasiner le pollen et quand ils ont contenu du couvain, parce que chaque abeille qui émerge laisse derrière elle un mince cocon à l'intérieur de sa cellule. Les rayons engorgés de pollen sont fréquents lorsque l'environnement est riche en espèces de fleurs. Les vieux rayons sombres, surtout ceux qui contiennent du pollen, produisent souvent un miel foncé susceptible de se troubler par la suite. Si la ruche en comporte plus de deux ou trois sans couvain, ils doivent être enlevés afin que la colonie dispose de plus d'espace pour l'élevage et pour construire de nouveaux rayons à miel.Dans une ruche à barrettes horizontale simple, environ la moitié des rayons doivent être alloués au couvain, avec un peu de pollen, et le reste laissé uniquement pour le miel. La ruche kenyane , du fait de sa petite taille, s'encombre souvent assez vite de vieux rayons gorgés de pollen. Les rayons à pollen, souvent situés à la périphérie du nid à couvain, peuvent faire barrière et décourager la reine d'aller pondre au-delà. S'il y en a plus de deux de chaque côté, ils doivent être enlevés, et soit jetés, soit donnés à une colonie jeune ou très faible, qui pourrait tirer profit de pollen supplémentaire.Dans une ruche à barrettes horizontale, le nid à couvain doit toujours être situé à proximité de l'entrée, qui peut se trouver à l'une des extrémités de la ruche ou sur l'un des grands côtés, au choix. La meilleure option est de maintenir le couvain contre l'une des extrémités, bien qu'il soit possible de le placer au milieu avec le miel de part et d'autre. Un rayon de miel et de pollen peut être placé tout contre la paroi, suivi des rayons à couvain jusqu'au milieu de la ruche.Il devrait alors rester suffisamment d'espace pour que les abeilles y bâtissent de nouveaux rayons blancs pour le stockage du miel. S'il y a trop de rayons à couvain, ils doivent être retirés, faute de quoi la colonie manquerait de place et serait incitée à essaimer sans produire de miel en excédent. Les méthodes de récolte traditionnelles ont été mises au point depuis longtemps et sont, le plus souvent, satisfaisantes. S'il existe des cueilleurs de miel sauvage peu scrupuleux qui détruisent une bonne part de la colonie, les apiculteurs sont généralement plus attentionnés et essaient de préserver les leurs. Ils ne prélèvent qu'une partie du miel et s'efforcent de ne pas déranger le nid à couvain. Le couvain peut d'ailleurs être récolté pour lui-même en tant qu'aliment riche en protéines. Prélever une petite part du couvain des colonies de grande taille peut même être bénéfique, dans la mesure où cela libère de l'espace pour le miel et prévient l'essaimage.La nuit est le meilleur moment pour récolter le miel d'une ruche traditionnelle dans les régions chaudes, surtout si l'apiculteur n'a pas de vêtements protecteurs. Dans les régions plus fraîches de montagne, par exemple sur le mont Elgon et dans les collines des Mau au Kenya, sur le mont Oku au Cameroun ou sur les hauts plateaux d'Éthiopie, certains apiculteurs récoltent le miel de jour, mais portent tout de même une protection, ne serait-ce qu'une couverture.Le matériel nécessaire pour récolter le miel d'une ruche traditionnelle se résume à un seau pour emporter le miel et à un moyen de produire de la fumée, par exemple un petit fagot. Si la ruche est suspendue haut dans un arbre (figure 40), il faudra également une corde pour monter le seau dans l'arbre ou faire descendre la ruche au sol.Pour calmer les abeilles, les apiculteurs traditionnels font de la fumée , souvent à l'aide d'un fagotin incandescent de petits bois et de lichen ou d'herbe. Les Tharakas, qui vivent sur les contreforts est du mont Kenya, utilisent une petite branche sèche d'environ 1 m de longueur et 6 cm de diamètre, qu'ils appellent kisinga. Cette branche est déchiquetée à l'une de ses extrémités et allumée. En soufflant fort sur cette partie de la branche, on obtient une flamme qui donne suffisamment de lumière pour voir à l'intérieur de la ruche. Une fois la flamme éteinte, la branche produit beaucoup de fumée, qui est soufflée doucement à l'intérieur de la ruche.La plupart des ruches africaines traditionnelles sont cylindriques et il est relativement facile d'en récolter le miel sans vêtements protecteurs. L'apiculteur soufflant de la fumée par une des extrémités de la ruche, les abeilles se regroupent de l'autre côté et les rayons situés près de la partie ouverte peuvent être retirés sans déranger la colonie outre mesure. Si l'apiculteur constate que l'extrémité qu'il a ouverte se trouve du côté du couvain, il la referme et intervient de l'autre côté. S'il se souvient laquelle des deux extrémités a été récoltée la fois précédente, il peut y revenir directement pour obtenir les rayons de la meilleure qualité, les plus récents, de couleur blanche.Il existe des ruches conçues pour être ouvertes aux deux extrémités et d'autres équipées de petites trappes sur le dessous. Ce type d'accès protège mieux la ruche des prédateurs, mais complique quelque peu la récolte du miel.Les ruches à barrettes sont conçues pour faciliter la récolte et devraient donner un miel de meilleure qualité que les ruches traditionnelles (pour autant que l'apiculteur dispose du matériel et du savoir-faire nécessaires). L'apiculteur peut examiner chaque rayon et décider s'il le retire ou non de la ruche. Les rayons à couvain et les rayons partiellement remplis de miel sont laissés en place, tandis que les nouveaux rayons pleins de miel sont enlevés.||◗ Ruches à barrettes horizontales (simples) Après avoir revêtu les vêtements de protection et allumé l'enfumoir, il faut installer la ruche vide à côté de la ruche sur laquelle on s'apprête à intervenir. On approche la ruche par derrière, on donne de la fumée par intermittence, puis on laisse le tout en paix pendant au moins une minute. Il faut ensuite enlever le toit de la ruche et donner de la fumée sur les barrettes. Celles-ci sont alors frappées avec le lève-cadres pour déterminer la répartition des rayons et identifier les barrettes encore vides. On enlève alors les quelques barrettes les plus éloignées du nid à couvain pour libérer un espace de travail, en donnant quelques bouffées de fumée au-dessus et à l'intérieur de la ruche. Le nid à couvain se situe généralement dans la zone la plus proche de l'entrée.À partir de là, il convient d'examiner les barrettes une par une, en repoussant celles qui ne sont pas prêtes à être récoltées vers l'extrémité de la ruche par où l'on a commencé. Chaque rayon doit être examiné attentivement mais sans perdre de temps, en le levant à la hauteur des yeux. Les rayons operculés sont récoltés et mis de côté dans la ruche vide, après les avoir débarrassés des abeilles qui s'y agrippent par une petite secousse donnée verticalement au-dessus de leur ruche. Une brosse à abeilles ou une grande plume peuvent être utilisées, mais la manoeuvre prend alors plus de temps. Tout rayon partiellement rempli de miel doit être rendu à la colonie. Il n'est pas nécessaire d'inspecter les rayons à couvain. Pour finir, il faut examiner les rayons qui se trouvent de l'autre côté du nid à couvain et enlever ceux qui sont prêts à être récoltés, ainsi que tout vieux rayon vide. On peut alors -----repositionner l'ensemble du couvain contre l'entrée de la ruche en ne laissant qu'un seul rayon entre le couvain et la paroi.Après la récolte, tous les rayons qui restent sont repoussés contre ceux du couvain, l'espace vide qui se trouve du côté où l'on a commencé l'intervention est comblé avec des barrettes neuves et la ruche est refermée. Environ la moitié du volume intérieur de la ruche devrait alors être occupée par des rayons à couvain, avec en sus un peu de pollen et un peu de miel. Dans le cas d'une colonie forte, la ruche doit être laissée à moitié vide, sans quoi il n'y aura pas assez de place pour que les abeilles puissent entreposer le miel pendant la saison suivante. Avec l'expérience, l'apiculteur finit par connaître les meilleures règles à suivre en la matière dans sa région.Les barrettes pourvues de rayons à miel sont de préférence transportées dans une ruche vide. Toutefois, si l'apiculteur n'a pas de barrettes de rechange, il est obligé de détacher les rayons des barrettes près de la ruche et de mettre les rayons dans un seau. Les rayons doivent être coupés à 1 cm de la barrette, ce qui laisse une amorce pour la construction du nouveau rayon. Il n'y a pas lieu de s'inquiéter si les cellules sont endommagées lors de cette opération, mais il est bon d'essayer de garder intacte la paroi médiane (la partie centrale formant le fond de toutes les cellules), pour inciter les abeilles à bâtir le nouveau rayon bien dans l'axe de la barrette.Les ruches à barrettes à hausses sont un peu plus complexes mais aussi plus souples que les ruches horizontales. Il est possible d'équiper une ruche de type Langstroth avec des barrettes, au lieu de cadres mobiles (figure 41). La hausse, également équipée de barrettes, peut être posée dès que le corps de ruche est presque plein et qu'il y des perspectives de miellée. Il faut éviter de la mettre trop tôt, quand les abeilles ne sont peut-être pas encore en mesure de la défendre ou de la garder propre. Lorsque l'on ajoute une hausse , il faut approcher la ruche doucement en donnant un peu de fumée autour de la ruche et dans l'entrée. On enlève alors le toit tout en donnant des bouffées de fumée sur les barrettes, après quoi la hausse peut être posée sur le corps de ruche. Les barrettes de la hausse doivent être poussées les unes contre les autres, bien jointives et centrées, laissant un espace de chaque côté, entre les deux barrettes externes et les parois de la hausse. Cet espace permet aux abeilles de passer pour défendre la ruche contre les fourmis, les fausses teignes et les coléoptères qui pourraient parvenir à se glisser sous le toit. On laisse alors la hausse en place jusqu'à ce qu'elle soit pleine, ce qui peut prendre quelques semaines à plusieurs mois. Si la saison est bonne, une seconde hausse peut être posée sur la première.Il faut éviter d'utiliser une grille à reine dans les ruches à barrettes parce que les abeilles sont tentées d'y attacher le fond de leurs rayons, ce qui entraîne la fracture des rayons lorsque la hausse est enlevée. Dans le cas de cadres mobiles, ce problème n'existe pas parce que la barre inférieure des cadres se situe à un passage d'abeille de la grille à reine.Les ruches à barrettes composées peuvent avoir un plateau solidaire ou indépendant du corps de ruche. L'avantage du plateau indépendant est que les hausses et le corps de ruche peuvent être intervertis si nécessaire ; par exemple, si la reine commence à pondre dans la première hausse, celle-ci peut être installée tout en bas pour que la reine finisse par remonter dans le corps de ruche. Toutefois, si la reine commence effectivement à pondre dans la hausse, le mieux est généralement de l'y laisser et de rajouter une autre hausse par-dessus ; elle reviendra probablement d'elle-même dans le corps de ruche et les Il est plus facile de récolter le miel dans des ruches composées que dans des ruches simples horizontales parce que l'apiculteur peut enlever une hausse entière avec tous ses rayons sans devoir manipuler chaque rayon séparément. Il faut toujours intervenir sur les ruches à rayons mobiles pendant la journée (de préférence en début de soirée) et porter des vêtements protecteurs. Le matériel nécessaire est le suivant : des vêtements de protection ; un enfumoir , du combustible et des allumettes ; un lève-cadres et un couteau ; une hausse de rechange équipée de barrettes, et éventuellement un plateau chasse-abeilles ; un seau pour transporter les rayons brisés et les morceaux de cire.On commence tout d'abord par enfiler les vêtements de protection et allumer l'enfumoir. On approche alors de la ruche par derrière, on l'enfume par intermittence et on la laisse en paix pour une ou deux minutes. Le toit est alors retiré, en donnant de la fumée par-dessous et dans l'entrée. Le dessus des barrettes est frappé avec le lève-cadres pour déterminer l'emplacement des rayons et estimer leur taux de remplissage. La hausse est alors légèrement soulevée à une extrémité à l'aide du même outil, et de la fumée est donnée dans la ruche à ce niveau, de manière à ce qu'elle monte dans la hausse et s'étale sur le dessus des barrettes de l'étage inférieur. On tire alors la hausse vers l'avant et on la bascule afin de voir les rayons. Si la hausse est pleine ou presque pleine, elle est prête à être récoltée, mais si les rayons n'ont pas encore atteint leur longueur définitive, il faut la replacer dans sa position d'origine et l'y laisser encore quelques semaines. Cependant, si l'apiculteur considère que la saison est arrivée à son terme, il peut décider de récolter le miel qui s'y trouve afin que les abeilles ne le consomment pas par la suite.Si la hausse est prête à être récoltée, on la retire de la ruche et on la débarrasse des abeilles qui s'y trouvent en lui donnant de petites secousses ou en les brossant. Cette opération peut être réalisée à proximité de la ruche si les abeilles sont calmes, ou plus loin si elles sont agressives. La hausse enlevée est alors remplacée par une hausse Il arrive que les abeilles soudent les rayons aux côtés de la ruche. Ils peuvent en être détachés en faisant doucement levier avec le lèvecadres ou avec un couteau étroit. Parfois, certains rayons sont également attachés à la face supérieure des barrettes de l'étage inférieur. Dans ce cas, les rayons se brisent près de leur base lorsque la hausse est enlevée. Il est alors important de bien gratter toute trace de cire restant sur le dessus des barrettes pour que les abeilles ne soient pas incitées à bâtir de nouveaux rayons au même endroit.Le tableau 5 présente une liste des problèmes auxquels sont fréquemment confrontés les apiculteurs, avec, pour chacun, leurs causes les plus probables et quelques suggestions quant à leurs solutions.Tableau 5. Problèmes rencontrés, causes et solutions . La fabrication des feuilles de cireLes feuilles de cire forment une base artificielle sur laquelle les abeilles sont incitées à bâtir leurs rayons. Les cadres mobiles sont généralement équipés de feuilles entières, tandis que les barrettes n'utilisent qu'une petite amorce de 1 cm de largeur sur la quasi-totalité de leur longueur. Sans cette amorce, les abeilles sont susceptibles de construire leurs rayons en diagonale au lieu de bien les aligner sous chaque barrette. Un apiculteur en activité est capable de produire sa propre cire d'abeille, mais ceux qui débutent doivent s'en procurer auprès de collègues déjà installés.L'odeur de la cire attire toujours les abeilles, aussi cette matière ne doit-elle être manipulée que dans un local où elles n'ont pas accès -quoique bien ventilé -, ou dehors à la nuit tombée, lorsque les butineuses ne volent plus. Comme la cire est hautement inflammable, il faut se garder de travailler près de toute matière susceptible de prendre feu.Le plateau servant de moule est en bois ou en contreplaqué, d'une largeur de 45 cm (la longueur est sans importance), et entouré d'un rebord fabriqué avec des tasseaux de bois d'une section carrée de 1 cm de côté (un plateau à servir, en plastique ou métal, peut aussi être utilisé). L'un des coins est laissé un peu ouvert pour pouvoir évacuer l'excès de cire.Il faut en outre :de la cire d'abeille ; un récipient pour fondre la cire (de préférence avec une chemise de refroidissement à eau) ; un feu ou une autre source de chaleur ; un petit seau avec de l'eau et un peu de savon ou de détergent ; une grande tasse ; un couteau.------La cire est mise à fondre dans le récipient prévu à cet effet, lui-même placé dans un autre récipient plus grand contenant de l'eau (chauffage au bain-marie). Le moule est passé à l'eau savonneuse, que l'on peut récupérer pour la suite. Une demi-tasse de cire fondue est versée sur le plateau encore mouillé, juste assez pour le recouvrir (figure 43). La cire en excès est reversée dans son récipient. En refroidissant, la cire se fige en une feuille de 1 à 2 mm d'épaisseur qui est décollée et découpée en bandes de 45 cm sur 1 cm de largeur (figure 44). Cette dernière opération est plus facile à chaud, mais la cire froide peut être découpée avec un fil de fer chauffé. Les chutes peuvent être réintégrées à la cire fondue pour couler d'autres feuilles. Les bandes de cire sont fixées sur les barrettes en les glissant dans les traits de scie, puis scellées à l'aide d'un filet de cire fondue (figure 45).||◗ Fabriquer des feuilles de cire gaufrée à l'aide d'un gaufrierLe matériel est le même que pour la technique précédente, complété par un couteau en plastique et un gaufrier, disponibles dans le commerce. Un gaufrier est un moule en métal ou en plastique constitué de deux parties. La base se présente sous l'aspect d'un plateau sur lequel est imprimé en relief inversé le motif de la paroi médiane d'un rayon Le gaufrier fonctionne mieux lorsqu'il est bien chaud, après quelques feuilles. Si les premières feuilles de cire laissent à désirer, mieux vaut les refondre et tenter un nouveau moulage. Il est plus efficace d'entreprendre la fabrication de feuilles de cire en quantités relativement importantes (plusieurs kilogrammes à la fois). Une personne expérimentée peut faire plus de 30 feuilles en une heure. Si l'on opère à deux, une personne fait fonctionner le gaufrier pendant que l'autre découpe les feuilles en bandes.||◗ Fabriquer des feuilles de cire à l'aide d'une plaque en verre ou en boisUne plaque en verre ou en bois est mouillée avec de l'eau savonneuse puis plongée dans un grand récipient de cire fondue. La plaque est retirée du bain et la cire qui en recouvre les deux côtés est décollée. Si la couche de cire ainsi formée est trop mince, la plaque peut être trempée à nouveau dans la cire fondue. Lorsqu'une plaque en verre est employée, les bords doivent être polis au préalable par le verrier. Cette méthode est efficace mais exige de disposer de plusieurs kilogrammes de cire d'abeille pour que, fondue, elle ait une profondeur suffisante dans le bac.Dans beaucoup de pays tropicaux, il y a suffisamment de plantes en fleurs pour subvenir aux besoins des colonies tout au long de l'année, ce qui rend le nourrissement superflu. De plus, nombre de petits exploitants ne peuvent pas se permettre d'acheter du sucre, qui est parfois plus cher que le miel. Les abeilles ne peuvent pas transformer le sucre en miel. En nourrissant les ruches, on prend en outre le risque que des abeilles pilleuses et des fourmis soient attirées par le sucre.Les colonies ne sont donc nourries que par des apiculteurs chevronnés, dans certains cas particuliers.Il est parfois conseillé de nourrir les nouvelles colonies provenant d'essaimages ou de divisions pour les aider à se développer plus rapidement. Certains apiculteurs confirmés utilisant des races européennes nourrissent leurs colonies d'emblée, mais il vaut mieux, avec les races africaines, qui désertent plus facilement, attendre quelques jours, le temps que les abeilles se soient bien installées. L'inconvénient du nourrissement précoce est d'attirer des abeilles pilleuses ou des fourmis susceptibles de perturber la ruche et de pousser la colonie à déserter.En prévision d'une miellée, une colonie déjà établie peut être nourrie pour stimuler la production de couvain, dans le but de disposer d'un nombre suffisant de butineuses au bon moment. Nourrir une colonie six semaines avant la date prévue de la miellée peut donc contribuer à accroître la production de miel. Il reste que bien souvent, surtout près de l'équateur, la date du début de miellée est difficile à prévoir avec précision. Dans les zones soumises à des sécheresses extrêmes, l'apiculteur peut nourrir ses colonies pour qu'elles survivent, et éviter qu'elles ne désertent.La manière la plus facile de nourrir des colonies est de leur donner du sucre cristallisé, sec, dans la ruche. Les abeilles dissolvent alors lentement les cristaux de sucre. Cette méthode est celle qui risque le moins d'attirer les abeilles pilleuses, mais elle est lente et génère souvent un certain gaspillage. Il arrive que du sucre tombe près de l'entrée où il peut attirer des fourmis . Il est préférable de dissoudre le sucre dans de l'eau bouillante, à raison d'environ une part de sucre pour une part d'eau, en remuant jusqu'à complète dissolution. Entre 1 et 5 kg de sucre peuvent être donnés en une seule fois. Le sirop de sucre Pour une ruche à barrettes simple, horizontale, les nourrisseurs de type mangeoire, suspendus à l'intérieur de la ruche, sont plus adaptés (figure 47). Il est aussi possible de nourrir les colonies à l'aide d'un simple sac en plastique à moitié rempli de sirop, et fermé avec un Dans les régions tempérées, un succédané est parfois distribué aux colonies qui sont à court de pollen. Dans la plupart des pays tropicaux, toutefois, il y a généralement surabondance de pollen. Il arrive que les abeilles en récoltent trop et qu'elles en saturent certains rayons. Dans ce cas, ces derniers doivent être retirés de la ruche afin de libérer de l'espace pour la construction de nouveaux rayons destinés au stockage du miel. Sur les marchés et dans les élevages, on observe souvent des abeilles récoltant la farine de diverses céréales qu'elles utilisent comme le pollen. La sélection, l'élevage et le « clippage » des reines Ces pratiques ne s'appliquent qu'aux ruches à rayons mobiles ou à cadres mobiles.Certaines caractéristiques , telles qu'un tempérament agressif ou docile, un comportement dynamique ou apathique, la propension à l'essaimage et la résistance aux maladies, varient d'une colonie à l'autre. Ces caractéristiques sont portées par des gènes et dépendent donc de la reine. Il est de ce fait possible, en sélectionnant et en élevant les reines, d'exercer un certain contrôle sur le comportement des colonies. Comme dans le cas des programmes de sélection des autres animaux d'élevage, ce processus prend du temps mais peut donner des résultats très positifs.Lorsqu'un apiculteur est particulièrement satisfait de l'une de ses colonies, il devrait tout faire pour la préserver : s'interdire de détruire les rayons de mâles qu'elle produit et, si possible, utiliser cette colonie pour la reproduction. À l'inverse, les reines des colonies présentant des caractéristiques indésirables devraient être détruites et remplacées, de préférence par des reines de souche différente. Ainsi, en présence d'une colonie beaucoup plus agressive que d'autres de même taille et de même force, l'apiculteur devrait en rechercher la reine et la tuer, dans l'espoir que les abeilles en élèveront une nouvelle dont la descendance se révèlera plus amène.Il est préférable, toutefois, de faire en sorte que la nouvelle reine provienne d'une lignée différente. Pour ce faire, l'apiculteur inspecte la ruche une semaine après avoir tué la reine et détruit toutes les cellules royales en construction. Il introduit alors un rayon d'oeufs et de jeunes larves provenant d'une colonie sélectionnée selon les caractéristiques désirées. Si toutes les cellules royales ont bien été détruites au préalable dans la ruche, les abeilles élèveront une nouvelle reine à partir du couvain sélectionné qui leur a été donné. Les ouvrages de Fert (1997) et Brother Adams (1987) pourront être consultés pour plus d'informations sur ce sujet.Lorsqu'une colonie essaime ou déserte, les abeilles ne quittent la ruche qu'en compagnie de la reine. Il est possible d'empêcher la reine de partir en raccourcissant l'une de ses ailes pour l'empêcher de voler.Pour clipper (on dit également rogner ou écourter) une reine, il faut la maintenir fermement par le thorax entre le pouce et l'index, et couper une seule des ailes à la moitié de sa longueur, avec une paire de petits ciseaux bien aiguisés. Il ne faut jamais saisir une reine par son abdomen, car elle pourrait être blessée.De bonnes colonies fortes peuvent être divisées pour remplir des ruches supplémentaires. De manière générale, il est conseillé de diviser les colonies après la récolte, car si l'opération est trop précoce, il est probable que ni la colonie mère ni sa subdivision ne seront assez vigoureuses pour engranger un surplus de miel. Il reste que diviser une colonie particulièrement forte qui menace d'essaimer peut les en dissuader sans pour autant anéantir toutes les chances de récolte.Les colonies qui ont été divisées demandent un peu de temps par la suite pour recouvrer des forces, mais elles sont souvent en mesure de produire du miel dès la saison suivante. Mieux vaut éviter de diviser une ruche faible, car les abeilles africaines sont susceptibles de déserter si elles sont divisées avant que leur colonie soit suffisamment vigoureuse.Les colonies fortes se reconnaissent à plusieurs indices : il y a beaucoup d'activité de vols à l'entrée de la ruche ; les abeilles se regroupent parfois en grappe à l'extérieur de l'entrée de la ruche pendant la nuit ; la ruche est lourde. Avant la division, l'apiculteur doit préparer une nouvelle ruche qu'il installe tout près de celle qu'il se propose de diviser. Cette dernière est alors ouverte et trois rayons contenant du couvain operculé ainsi que deux rayons de miel et de pollen sont enlevés et placés dans la nouvelle ruche, avec la reine si l'on parvient à la localiser. Si la reine reste introuvable, il faut s'assurer que le couvain introduit dans la nouvelle ruche contient des oeufs et des jeunes larves, pour que les abeilles puissent élever une nouvelle reine si nécessaire. Quatre rayons sont alors extraits de la ruche mère et brièvement secoués au-dessus de la nouvelle ruche pour y faire tomber les abeilles, puis remis à leur place. Dans chaque ruche, les espaces vides sont alors comblés avec de nouvelles barrettes et les toits sont posés.Pour finir, il faut déplacer la nouvelle ruche et l'installer à son emplacement définitif. Un certain nombre d'abeilles retourneront à la ruche mère, mais la nouvelle colonie devrait se développer au fur et à mesure 5. Les opérations spécialisées de l'émergence des jeunes. L'accroissement de la nouvelle colonie peut éventuellement être accéléré en nourrissant les abeilles.Il est parfois nécessaire de déplacer des colonies pour plus de commodité ou pour tirer parti d'une miellée particulière. Ainsi certains apiculteurs éthiopiens déplacent-ils leurs colonies d'une vallée à une autre pour exploiter la ressource de miellée la plus prometteuse. Les ruches sont déménagées à dos d'âne, en prenant soin de fermer toutes les issues et de les envelopper dans un drap ou une couverture pour que les animaux ne soient pas piqués.Il est essentiel que les rayons ne se brisent pas pendant le transport.Les rayons bâtis dans des ruches en tronc d'arbre ou dans les cadres de ruches à cadres mobiles sont généralement à l'abri d'incidents de ce type, mais les rayons de ruches à barrettes se cassent facilement, surtout s'ils sont alourdis de miel. Ces ruches ne sont donc pas adaptées à des déplacements fréquents. Lorsque l'apiculteur emploie des ruches à cadres mobiles et que les routes sont bonnes, le transport motorisé sur un camion ou une camionnette à plateau est intéressant, si son coût est raisonnable.Les ruches doivent être déplacées de nuit ou par temps de pluie, lorsque les abeilles ne volent pas, afin d'éviter de perdre des butineuses. Les ruches doivent être bien enfumées pour que les abeilles restent calmes et se cantonnent à l'intérieur. Toutes les issues doivent être obturées avec de l'herbe ou de l'argile (veiller toutefois à ne pas asphyxier les abeilles), ou encore la ruche entière peut être enveloppée dans un drap. Une fois à destination, des obstacles tels que quelques brins d'herbe peuvent être placés devant l'entrée pour que les abeilles prennent conscience de leur nouvel emplacement et se réorientent.Les abeilles apprennent à s'orienter par rapport à la ruche. Il s'ensuit qu'une colonie doit être déménagée d'une distance inférieure à 3 m ou supérieure à 3 km, faute de quoi les butineuses sont susceptibles de revenir à l'endroit où se trouvait leur ruche auparavant. Il est toutefois possible de déplacer une ruche sur une petite distance en opérant par étapes successives de quelques mètres. La colonie peut aussi être déménagée en une fois mais en prenant soin d'installer dans son emplacement d'origine une autre ruche pleine ou une ruche appât pour accueillir les butineuses qui pourraient revenir et qui viennent alors grossir les rangs de cette autre colonie.Il est possible d'importer dans les pays tropicaux des abeilles issues d'autres régions. Importer des abeilles présente pratiquement les mêmes avantages et inconvénients qu'importer d'autres animaux domestiques ou des plantes cultivées. Même si les souches importées peuvent s'avérer plus travailleuses ou plus amènes, cette pratique ne va pas sans un certain risque. Ainsi, lorsque des abeilles africaines ont été introduites en Amérique du Sud en 1956, elles ont dominé les populations locales à tel point que la quasi-totalité des abeilles de ce continent sont désormais hybridées (elles sont dites « africanisées »). La propagation des maladies est un autre problème important. Le varroa (Varroa jacobsoni), un acarien parasite externe de l'abeille domestique, a été répandu dans la plupart des pays du globe par les échanges d'abeilles ou de reines (voir le chapitre 6). Il est de ce fait plus sage et moins risqué d'éviter de déplacer des abeilles sur de grandes distances, à moins de s'entourer des conseils d'un spécialiste, tout en se conformant à la réglementation locale et internationale en la matière. Beaucoup de pays soumettent désormais l'importation d'abeilles à une autorisation spéciale.Il a maintes fois été tenté, mais sans succès, d'introduire en Afrique centrale des abeilles européennes, plus dociles. Lorsque la reine d'une colonie d'abeilles africaines est remplacée par une reine européenne (remérage), il semblerait que la colonie commence par se développer de manière tout à fait satisfaisante, pour ensuite s'affaiblir et mourir. Ce phénomène pourrait être dû à une maladie. Selon une autre hypothèse, les abeilles européennes continueraient à travailler tout au long de la journée en dépit des hautes températures et finiraient par s'épuiser, alors que les abeilles africaines ne sortent qu'aux heures les moins chaudes.Néanmoins, la transhumance de colonies à l'échelle locale comporte quelques avantages. Par exemple, une colonie déplacée d'un site aride à végétation clairsemée vers un autre site où les floraisons sont plus régulières est susceptible de travailler avec plus de dynamisme que les colonies du cru habituées à ces conditions favorables. Il reste que les tentatives d'introduction d'abeilles dans des milieux différents de La pollinisation est le processus par lequel le pollen est transféré des organes mâles de la fleur (les anthères des étamines) sur les organes femelles (le stigmate) de la même fleur, ou d'une autre de la même espèce. Si les céréales et les graminées sont en général pollinisées par le vent, la plupart des autres plantes le sont par des insectes. L'abeille domestique est un des pollinisateurs les plus efficaces. Les cultures qui dépendent d'une pollinisation par des insectes ont un meilleur rendement si des abeilles sont présentes dans le voisinage. Certains cultivateurs sont prêts à payer des apiculteurs pour qu'ils placent des ruches dans leurs parcelles. Cependant, le comportement agressif des abeilles africaines les rend peu adaptées à ce type d'activité agricole transhumante, et il est plus facile de les maintenir toute l'année sur un site proche des cultures. Dans le cas où les abeilles sont essentiellement gardées pour leurs services de pollinisation et doivent être déplacées d'une culture à une autre, il vaut mieux investir dans des ruches à cadres mobiles dans lesquelles les rayons sont un peu moins vulnérables. Les espèces cultivées en zone tropicale, connues pour dépendre de la pollinisation par les abeilles, sont présentées dans la liste ci-dessous. Certaines d'entre elles peuvent par ailleurs donner de bonnes récoltes de miel.Les plantes cultivées en régions tropicales dont les rendements sont accrus par l'action pollinisatrice des abeilles sont : agrumes Citrus spp. ; anacardier (noix de cajou) ; avocatier ; caféier ; Cléome gynandra ; cocotier ; colza ; coton nier ; Desmodium spp. ; fruit de la passion ; haricot ; légumineuses alimentaires ; luzerne ; manguier ; moutardesfeuilles ; pêcher ; pyrèthre ; ricin ; sésame ; tournesol . La luzerne et le pyrèthre ont un nectar peu abondant.Bien que les cultures pollinisées par le vent n'aient en théorie pas besoin d'abeilles, ces insectes peuvent permettre un accroissement des rendements atteignant parfois 20 %. Chez certaines céréales telles que le maïs et le sorgho, les abeilles récoltent le pollen et même le miellat , exsudat sucré produit par la plante ailleurs que dans la fleur.Avant d'installer une ruche dans une parcelle cultivée, il est important de s'assurer que l'exploitant n'utilise pas d'insecticides pendant toute la période de présence des abeilles, notamment lorsque les cultures sont en fleur. Il existe aussi d'autres insectes pollinisateurs qui devraient être préservés en protégeant leurs milieux naturels et en ne recourant pas aux insecticides. Les abeilles africaines essaient de repousser ces attaques en formant une boule compacte à l'entrée de la ruche, tandis que les fourmis les extirpent une par une et les mangent. En général, ce sont les fourmis qui finissent par dominer la situation. Si elles interviennent de jour, les abeilles fuient la ruche en direction des habitations situées à proximité, ce qui alerte parfois l'apiculteur. Il arrive que la colonie entière déserte les lieux pour revenir après le départ des fourmis. Le plancher d'une ruche qui a subi l'incursion de fourmis légionnaires est couvert de cadavres d'abeilles et de fourmis.Plusieurs autres espèces de fourmis peuvent quelquefois être observées dans la ruche et aux alentours. Si certaines ne font que rechercher un abri, la plupart entrent dans la ruche pour y dérober du miel ou du couvain. Les colonies vigoureuses sont normalement capables de tenir tête aux espèces les plus petites, mais une colonie faible éprouve quelquefois des difficultés à se débarrasser des minuscules fourmis qui harcèlent les abeilles.Il est difficile de protéger les ruches des fourmis, mais les mesures cidessous s'avèrent souvent utiles : si les ruches sont au sol, glisser une plaque de métal entre la ruche et son socle. La plaque devrait dépasser d'au moins 5 cm tout autour du socle. Les fourmis sont capables de franchir cet obstacle, mais avec difficulté, ce qui décourage beaucoup d'entre elles. Ces plaques peuvent également protéger la ruche des attaques de termites et par ailleurs, limitent l'emprise de la végétation tout près de la ruche ;verser des cendres fraîches autour du socle de la ruche. Les cendres doivent être remplacées fréquemment, surtout après avoir été mouillées ; verser de l'huile de vidange autour du socle de la ruche ; suspendre les ruches par des fils de fer enduits de graisse ; bien désherber pour ne laisser aucune végétation en contact avec le socle des ruches ; s'assurer que les ruches comportent un espace suffisant entre le dessus des barrettes et le toit, pour que les abeilles puissent y patrouiller et repousser les intrus. On observe souvent des fourmis s'installer sous le toit des ruches lorsque les abeilles ne peuvent y accéder.Certains apiculteurs placent les pieds des socles des ruches dans de vieilles boîtes de conserve ou des récipients en plastique remplis d'huile usagée ou d'eau. Cette méthode offre en effet une protection contre les fourmis mais n'est pas recommandée dans la mesure où des abeilles tombent dans ces récipients lorsque la ruche est ouverte. Il est également déconseillé de saupoudrer des insecticides en cercle autour de la ruche parce que les abeilles peuvent s'en trouver contaminées. Confronté à une offensive en cours, l'apiculteur peut disperser les fourmis avec des cendres chaudes, ou avec un vaporisateur insecticide domestique, en prenant bien garde de ne pas atteindre d'abeilles.Le ratel (Mellivora capensis) est un animal très puissant doté d'une peau extrêmement résistante et de fortes griffes (figure 48). Il préfère ------le couvain au miel et déchire facilement le bois des ruches les plus solides. Il peut également grimper dans les branches basses des arbres et faire tomber les ruches traditionnelles au sol. Dans certaines régions, les apiculteurs protègent leurs ruches en clouant une feuille de tôle autour du tronc des arbres porteurs pour empêcher ces animaux de monter. Là où les ratels font de gros dégâts, les ruches doivent être installées dans des ruchers-pavillons ou suspendues à une hauteur d'au moins 60 cm du sol. Une fosse creusée sous la ruche donnera un complément de protection (voir le chapitre 4, figure 37).L'espèce de coléoptère de ruche la plus grande recherche le miel, tandis que la plus petite entre dans la ruche pour s'y reproduire. La première, Oplostomus fuligineus (figure 49), est un coléoptère mellivore surtout présent à basse altitude sous climat chaud. Il fait parfois des dégâts importants, surtout dans les colonies faibles. Le grand coléoptère des ruches peut être ramassé à la main sur les rayons, mais l'opération est laborieuse et difficile du fait de l'agressivité des abeilles africaines. Mieux vaut tenter d'empêcher ces insectes de pénétrer dans la ruche en limitant la taille des orifices d'entrée , par exemple en les recouvrant d'un grillage ou en les obstruant partiellement avec une plaque métallique. L'entrée doit être assez grande pour laisser passer mises en difficulté. Ce coléoptère se reproduit dans la ruche et ses larves se nourrissent de pollen et de miel, ce qui provoque la fermentation du miel et sa liquéfaction. Une attaque de grande ampleur peut réduire l'ensemble des rayons à un amas pulvérulent sur le plancher de la ruche. La lutte préventive consiste à aider la colonie à repousser ces coléoptères. Les abeilles doivent pouvoir avoir accès à toutes les parties de la ruche pour en chasser les intrus et protéger leurs larves. Si leur nombre est insuffisant pour couvrir tous les vieux rayons, il faut en retirer quelques-uns. Le petit coléoptère des ruches a maintenant atteint l'Europe, où les dommages qu'il occasionne sont encore plus importants qu'en Afrique, son continent d'origine. Il est vraisemblable que cette espèce deviendra également un problème sérieux dans les régions du Pacifique et des Caraïbes.Les fausses teignes font plus de dégâts dans les régions à climat tropical que dans les zones tempérées. Il en existe deux espèces : la grande fausse teigne (Galleria mellonella ) et la petite fausse teigne (Achroia grisella ). Ces papillons vivent et se reproduisent sur les rayons, notamment sur les vieux rayons noirâtres. On les aperçoit quelquefois dans les ruches qui en sont envahies, et aussi dans les rayons où l'on peut observer les galeries tissées de la soie des larves. Des rayons entiers peuvent devenir une seule masse de fils enchevêtrés, et quand les larves entrent en nymphose, elles se creusent une loge dans le bois de la ruche (figures 51 et 52). On trouve généralement les fausses teignes dans les colonies faibles, qu'elles peuvent éventuellement tuer ou pousser à déserter, tandis que les colonies vigoureuses sont capables de leur tenir tête. Il arrive souvent qu'une nouvelle colonie entre dans une ruche détruite par les fausses teignes et s'y installe, abandonnant les restes de rayons tombés sur le plancher de la ruche, nettoyant et bâtissant de nouveaux rayons par le haut. On observe parfois des infestations de fausses teignes après qu'un essaimage a affaibli une colonie forte. Le risque est accru si les abeilles ont consommé beaucoup de miel et ont laissé des rayons vides sans surveillance. Toute colonie qui a perdu sa reine est susceptible d'être attaquée par les fausses teignes.Le meilleur moyen de prévenir les attaques de fausses teignes est de faire en sorte que les colonies demeurent suffisamment fortes et de retirer les rayons de miel que les abeilles ne sont pas en mesure de défendre. Les rayons vides constituent un excellent substrat de reproduction pour ces papillons. Les ruches à barrettes sont ici avantagées Le sphinx à tête de mort (Acherontia atropos ) est un gros papillon de nuit qui pénètre dans les colonies affaiblies pour y consommer du miel (figure 53). On le reconnaît à la tache en forme de tête de mort qu'il exhibe sur le thorax. Ces papillons ne perturbent pas les colonies fortes. Le mieux est de les expulser des ruches lorsqu'on l'y aperçoit.Certaines guêpes telles que l'espèce Polarus latifrons attaquent parfois les abeilles à l'entrée de la ruche et les emportent pour les consommer ou en nourrir leurs larves. Ces insectes posent souvent plus de problèmes dans les régions chaudes, où ils peuvent empêcher les abeilles de sortir butiner s'ils sont présents en grand nombre. Les apiculteurs luttent contre ces guêpes chasseresses en plaçant un plat rempli d'eau sous l'entrée de la ruche, ce qui en piège un bon nombre. Il arrive que quelques abeilles s'y noient également, mais les conséquences pour la colonie en sont relativement mineures. Les ravageurs ordinairement connus sous le nom de poux des abeilles ou braules (Braula spp.) sont en fait de minuscules mouches dépourvues d'ailes. Les braules sont de temps à autre observées sur le thorax des abeilles domestiques, notamment sur les reines, qui en portent parfois plusieurs. La femelle pond ses oeufs sur les opercule s de cire des cellules à miel, et les larves creusent de très fins tunnels sous la surface des rayons de miel. Certains observateurs sont d'avis que les petits points blancs que l'on voit quelquefois sur les rayons à couvain sont des oeufs de braule. La meilleure protection est d'avoir des colonies fortes.Les recherches ont montré que les acariens sont un facteur de stress pour les abeilles, et peut-être contribuent-ils aux échecs répétés des tentatives d'importation d'abeilles exotiques en Afrique, au sud du Sahara. On sait peu de choses sur les acariens qui s'attaquent aux abeilles domestiques en Afrique, mais ils sont à prendre en considération lorsque l'on se trouve confronté à une colonie qui s'affaiblit sans raison apparente.La varroa se est une maladie causée par l'acarien Varroa jacobsoni, découvert à l'origine en Asie du Sud-Est sur la petite abeille asiatique Apis cerana . Depuis les années 1970, cependant, cet acarien, qui parasite également l'espèce Apis mellifica, s'est propagé à l'ensemble de l'Eurasie et du continent américain et il est aussi présent en Afrique du Nord. Il a également été observé en Afrique du Sud, où cette menace est prise très au sérieux. On ne sait pas encore si l'abeille africaine, dont les cycles de reproduction sont légèrement plus courts, résistera mieux que l'abeille européenne . Si le varroa finit par se répandre et s'installer dans toute l'Afrique, les conséquences pourraient en être très graves. Il s'agit là d'une raison fondamentale pour s'abstenir d'importer des abeilles de zones infestées vers des zones encore exemptes.La ruche horizontale à deux reines conçue par Maurice Chaudière (2005) permet notamment d'éliminer les varroas sans traitement chimique.Les insectes qui attaquent le bois sont capables d'occasionner d'importants dégâts aux ruches. Ils peuvent être découragés en passant l'extérieur des ruches à la peinture ou à la créosote. Ce produit a une odeur qui attire les abeilles, mais ne doit pas contenir d'adjuvant insecticide. On parvient parfois à protéger le bambou, particulièrement vulnérable aux insectes xylophages , en le fumant ou en le faisant tremper dans l'eau pendant plusieurs jours. La fumée de la plante muletha serait également un répulsif pour les destructeurs du bois. Les possibilités ne manquent pas d'écouler localement le miel des petits producteurs, mais le type de miel proposé et son prix de vente doivent correspondre à la demande. Les apiculteurs qui souhaitent commercialiser eux-mêmes leur production doivent donc réaliser une rapide étude de marché. Par exemple, les habitants des environs sontils prêts à payer un bon prix pour un miel propre et limpide, de bonne saveur, présenté dans un conditionnement de qualité ? Préfèreraientils plutôt un miel de qualité moindre à un prix plus modique ? Quels sont les types de miel déjà disponibles sur le marché ? Si tous les miels proposés sont de qualité moyenne, il existe peut-être un marché potentiel pour un produit de qualité supérieure. Les transformateurs trouvent parfois avantageux de rejoindre, ou de constituer, une structure de taille supérieure pour commercialiser leur miel. Un organisme de grande dimension a plus de ressources financières et un meilleur accès au crédit. Il peut acheter le matériel de conditionnement en gros à un prix inférieur, et il se trouve dans une position plus forte pour négocier les contrats de vente et les canaux de distribution. La cire est sécrétée par quatre paires de glandes cirières se trouvant sur la face ventrale de l'abdomen des ouvrières. Elle apparaît sous la forme de minuscules écailles que l'abeille mâchonne avant de l'utiliser La cire peut être extraite par petites quantités ou entreposée en vue d'un traitement en gros, et ce, jusqu'à une tonne de rayon par session. Un récipient de 20 l rempli de rayons blancs permet normalement d'obtenir presque 20 kg de miel et 2 kg de cire. En revanche, dans le cas de vieux rayons sombres, ces rendements peuvent descendre à 10 kg de miel seulement et moins de 0,5 kg de cire. Ces types de rayons donnent peu de cire parce qu'ils sont constitués en bonne partie de pollen et de débris de cocon, qui forment le marc de cire . Un peu de cire peut en être extrait si l'on dispose d'une bonne presse à vapeur. L'emploi de ruches à cadres mobiles, dans lesquelles les rayons sont rendus à la ruche une fois vidés de leur miel, permet l'extraction de cire uniquement des opercule s, ce qui correspond à seulement 1 à 2 % du poids du rayon. 7. Les produits de l'apiculture L'apicultureLa cire d'abeille est un bon produit de rapport car elle se conserve indéfiniment et sa valeur au kilogramme est relativement élevée. La cire est facile à écouler dans les régions où la filière commerciale existe déjà. Des possibilités de vente à l'international existent : l'Éthiopie est ainsi le quatrième producteur mondial de cire d'abeille. La difficulté est que les exportateurs ne sont généralement pas intéressés par l'achat de petites quantités provenant d'apiculteurs isolés. En l'absence de filière active, il est probablement plus profitable pour le producteur de transformer sa cire en produits finis commercialisables sur place, des bougies par exemple.Les autres produits de la rucheLes abeilles récoltent le pollen sur les anthères des fleurs et le ramènent à la ruche sous forme de petites pelotes accrochées à leurs pattes. Les apiculteurs le récupèrent en installant une trappe à pollen , un simple grillage métallique à travers lequel les butineuses doivent passer pour pénétrer dans la ruche et qui décroche et fait tomber les pelotes de pollen dans un plateau au-dessous (figure 61). La plupart des trappes à pollen ne conviennent qu'aux modèles dont le plancher est indépendant du corps de ruche. Le principe devrait pouvoir être adapté aux autres modèles, mais il s'avère généralement difficile de récolter le pollen lorsque l'entrée est de taille réduite.Le pollen est riche en protéines. Son potentiel commercial est considérable et encore largement inexploité. Le plus souvent, les api culteurs qui le récoltent le réservent pour leur propre consommation ou le vendent comme complément alimentaire par l'intermédiaire de filières spécialisées en alimentation diététique et naturelle. Le pollen pourrait être un complément nutritif intéressant dans les régions où le régime alimentaire habituel est pauvre en protéines. Beaucoup de plantes africaines produisent un pollen abondant et des rendements atteignant 10 kg par ruche sont possibles dans nombre de secteurs. Le pollen moisissant à l'humidité, il doit être bien séché puis conservé dans des récipients hermétiques.La propolis est un exsudat végétal que les abeilles récoltent surtout sur les arbres et les arbustes. Les abeilles utilisent cette substance gommeuse pour obturer toutes les fissures à l'intérieur de la ruche et pour diminuer la taille de l'entrée. Les larves de fausses teignes ainsi que d'autres prédateurs sont parfois retrouvés embaumés dans de la propolis lorsqu'elles n'ont pas pu être transportées à l'extérieur. La propolis peut servir à boucher de petits trous dans les citernes, les seaux et les toitures en tôle.Beaucoup de choses ont été dites au sujet des vertus médicinales de la propolis, dont certaines sont exagérées. Cette substance est connue pour ses propriétés antibiotiques et pourrait être utile pour le traitement des plaies. Mâcher de la propolis serait en outre efficace pour lutter contre les maux de dent et les aphtes.La gelée royale est une sécrétion glandulaire des abeilles qui leur sert à nourrir leurs larves. Les larves d'ouvrière en consomment pendant trois jours avant de passer à un régime de miel et de pollen, tandis que les larves de reine sont uniquement nourries de gelée royale. Celle-ci peut être récoltée dans les cellules royales des ruches, mais l'opération est délicate. En outre, elle doit être conservée à basse température en permanence. Elle est utilisée dans la fabrication de produits de beauté haut de gamme ou vendue comme complément alimentaire. Comme 7. Les produits de l'apiculture elle n'est généralement disponible qu'en petites quantités, la gelée royale ne peut pas vraiment être considérée comme une denrée alimentaire de valeur. Il reste que certaines personnes sont prêtes à payer un prix élevé pour de la gelée royale pure ou mélangée à du miel.Le venin d'abeille peut être récolté en incitant les abeilles à piquer une mince membrane de latex tendue sur un cadre en bois. Cette membrane est parcourue par de fins fils électriques qui exaspèrent les abeilles et les poussent à piquer. Une fois sec, le venin apparaît sous la forme de minuscules paillettes qui sont récoltées au revers de la membrane. Le venin est utilisé à des fins médicales, pour immuniser des personnes ayant développé une allergie aux piqûre s d'abeille ou pour traiter des arthrites et autres pathologies similaires. La récolte et la commercialisation du venin reste toutefois un travail très spécialisé qui ne doit être entrepris que par des apiculteurs formés en ce sens et ayant accès aux marchés adéquats.Des apiculteurs déjà bien établis peuvent souhaiter rechercher de nouvelles possibilités de commercialisation au-delà de leur environnement immédiat. Selon les cas, il est plus avantageux de faire cette démarche à titre individuel ou en collaboration avec d'autres apiculteurs, agriculteurs ou entrepreneurs divers. Le développement des marchés exige un certain investissement en termes de travail, d'argent et d'acquisition de nouvelles connaissances tout en comportant également une part de risque. L'évolution actuelle vers la mondialisation des marchés apporte de nouvelles opportunités de vente mais expose également à une concurrence accrue. Les producteurs apicoles qui désirent tirer parti des possibilités offertes devront en échange se conformer aux normes internationales de qualité, concernant par exemple l'étiquetage et l'identification par code-barres. Il convient donc de commencer par s'assurer que les bénéfices envisageables seront bien à la hauteur du surcroît d'investissement qu'il faudra concéder. Miel crémeux (creamed honey, seeded honey) : miel liquide auquel a été ajoutée une part de miel finement cristallisé, ce qui provoque la cristallisation de l'ensemble (processus appelé cristallisation dirigée).Miel en rayon, miel en section (comb honey) : miel vendu dans son rayon d'origine.Miel en section : voir miel en rayon.Miel extrait (extracted honey) : miel qui a été retiré des rayons, généralement dans des cadres mobiles, à l'aide d'un extracteur. , 21, 26, 37, 39, 85, 113, 124, 125 butineuse, 20, 83, 91 "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2311850802.json b/main/part_2/2311850802.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2661dbd865cd92a65f18b7eab61d3d056e86a0f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2311850802.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d534faf60630c85e94f70356bb674a7d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5d87931a-0164-4c5c-a338-5e633d06ff12/retrieve","id":"639522235"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c773cf02-b041-4358-8f35-c7d9afb5e054","content":"Identifying priority value chains (VC) through a participatory approach is key for a successful development of climate-smart VCs to increase the resilience and adaptive capacity of community in West Africa.  A total of twelve (12) priority agricultural VCs have been identified and validated through stakeholders' workshops in Segou (Mali), Tillaberi (Niger) and Kaffrine (Senegal).  Priority VCs include sorghum/millet, goat, groundnut, non-timber forest products (NTFP) in Senegal, (ii) rice, millet, vegetable, cowpea, goat/sheep in Mali and (iii) rice, millet, red meat in Niger. The priority VCs have been selected according to three main criteria including the current and future resilience of the VC, the percentage of the population engaged in them and the involvement of poor people, women and youth in them. Women and men are differently engaged in the selected VCs. Women are more engaged in vegetable, cowpea, goats/sheep/red meat and NTFP value chains than the other VCs. They are also more engaged in the marketing than input supply for all the priority VC.This series of briefs summarizes findings from stakeholders' workshops conducted as part of CCAFS-EU-IFAD funded project -Developing climate-smart value chains and landscapes for increased resilient livelihood in West Africa\" in Mali, Niger and Senegal. These workshops were conducted by researchers from CCAFS West Africa regional program and the Alliance Bioversity-CIAT.Climate change is already having a significant effect on agriculture and food security in West Africa. Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is proposed as a solution to transform and reorient agricultural systems to support food security under the new realities of climate change. To benefit from the positive gains arising from CSA, a wide scale adoption of CSA technologies and practices is required. The value chain (VC) approach is positioning as a major upscaling opportunity for agricultural innovations in general and CSA options in particular as it offers opportunities to address most of adoption constraints of CSA. Through ensuring an effective and efficient coordination among its actors and creating partnerships with other stakeholders (such as public-private, private-cooperatives and related organizations along the VC), the VC approach improves the access to input and product markets and support the development of business services, contributing to promote the uptake of CSA technologies and practices.The Output 2 of the CCAFS-EU-IFAD-funded project \"Building Livelihoods and Resilience to Climate Change in East and West Africa: Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) for large-scale implementation of Climate-Smart Agriculture\", aims at developing climatesmart value chains to increase livelihood resilience in West Africa (Mali, Niger and Senegal). To reach this goal, the preliminary activity of the project was to conduct a series of stakeholders' workshops in order to select promising VCs for the promotion of CSA in Mali, Niger and Senegal.The prioritization of VCs has been conducted at regional level. Three regional stakeholders' workshops have been organized by CCAFS WA in Senegal (3-5 Nov 2020), Mali (24-26 Nov 2020) and Niger (9-11 Dec 2020) to identify and characterize the priority agricultural VCs for the regions of Kaffrine, Segou and Tillaberi respectively. Workshops gathered 25 to 30 participants, representative of rural development stakeholders in each region. Participants come from regional technical services (Agriculture, livestock, forestry, etc.), farmers' organizations, development projects/programs, private sector (banks, insurance companies, input suppliers), regional authority representatives, and researchers from national agricultural research system (IER, INRAN, ISRA) and CGIAR system (CCAFS, ICRISAT, Alliance Bioversity-CIAT).The objectives of the workshops were to: (i) validate priority VCs, (ii) present and discuss climate trends and climate change projections, (iii) identify important hazards and risks for the key VCs, (iv) identify underlying vulnerability factors (v) identify adaptation options, (vi) identify and map institutions, their resources and capacities.Only the results from the prioritization (objective 1) are presented in this info note. In line with this objective 1, a long list of VCs has been established by the participants. Then, they have been assessed through tree main criteria including: (i) current and future resilience of the VC, (ii) percentage of population engaged in the VC, (iii) inclusion of poor, women and youth in the VC.From this assessment 3 to 5 VC have been selected as priority VCs in each region.Twenty-eight (28) agricultural VCs have been inventoried by the participants to the stakeholder's workshop in Segou (Table 1). The analysis of these VCs according to the three criteria mentioned above led to the selection of 5 priority VCs for the region of Segou. The selected VCs are: rice, millet, goat/sheep, cowpea and vegetable. H=High, M=Medium, L=Low, Y=Yes, N=No, Selected VC (in green)From fourteen (14) VCs inventoried by the participants in Niger, 3 VCs (rice, millet, red meat) have been identified as those which are resilient, involve directly or indirectly more than 60% of the population of Tillaberi region and engage more than 50% of the poor, women and young people (Table 1). Red meat VC refers to cattle, sheep and goat meat. H=High, M=Medium, L=Low, Y=Yes, N=No, Selected VC (in green)Fifteen (15) agricultural VCs have been inventoried by participants to the stakeholders' workshop in Kaffrine, from which 4 have been selected as priority VCs. The selected VCs include: millet/sorghum, groundnut, goats and non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Millet and sorghum were merged to make one VC (millet/sorghum) because of the similarity of their production system in Senegal. H=High, M=Medium, L=Low, Y=Yes, N=No, Selected VC (in green)The VCs have been characterized based on the number of people engaged in them, the types of actors, the key activities, the involvement of poor, men and women in the VCs.A part from vegetable VC all the selected VC engage more than 50% of people (Figure 1). The red meat and millet VCs in Tillaberi, groundnut and millet/sorghum VCs in Kaffrine involve more than 80% of people while cowpea, sheep/goats and millet VCs engage more than 60% of people in Segou. -Millet is wildly produced in the Sahel. In 2019, the harvested areas of millet were estimated at 6.8 million of ha in Niger, 1.9 million in Mali, and 0.8 million in Senegal for a total production of 3.2 million tons, 1.8 million tons and 0.8 million tons respectively (Table 4).The yield of millet is low (less than 500kg/ha in Niger).-Rice is produced in irrigation system along of the Niger River in Segou and Tillaberi. The harvested areas of rice were 924 644 ha in Mali for a total production of 3 196 336 Tons.-Goat and sheep are wildly produced in the Sahel. In 2019, the number of goats were estimated at 26,4 million heads, 18,1 million heads in Niger, and 6,2 million heads in Senegal. The priority value chains have been selected through a participatory approach for their high current and future resilience to climate change and variability, their inclusiveness (involvement of poor, women, youth) and the high percentage of people engaged into them. The prioritized VCs covered agriculture in its broader sense including crops, livestock and forestry.-Millet is a VC which is common to all the three countries. It is with sorghum the main staple and climate-smart crop in the Sahel as it requires less water (drought tolerant) and it is adapted do poor soils.-Rice, cowpea, groundnut, and vegetables are positioning as cash crops with an increasingly growing demand in all the three countries.-Livestock (goats, sheep and cattle) helps on family income, asset savings, agricultural diversification and intensification in the Sahel.-Rice, cowpea, groundnut, vegetables, NTFP, goat, sheep are VCs which involve many women and youth. Therefore, they can contribute to empower women and youth.-In view of their specific roles as described above (food supply, income, inclusiveness), the selected VCs deserve to be promoted as potentially climate-smart to increase the livelihood resilience of the communities in the Sahel.- "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2365531618.json b/main/part_2/2365531618.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..121a0dadd1fdef66fea5f1104c4234e80064289e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2365531618.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"15455073b125a30afae9803f0096c9f6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/15725952-e14c-49e9-90d6-ec22dc60bf1a/retrieve","id":"-1179126401"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"aeb50adb-95dc-4a83-abdb-f562409f93ed","content":"Initiative to Increase Women's Voice and Agency in Demanding Assets for Climate ResilienceThe International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), one of the research centers within the global Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), has a long history of gender research relevant to its mission of reducing poverty and ending hunger and malnutrition. Over the last two decades, gender has been effectively incorporated into all of IFPRI's strategic research areas and into all phases of research. There is abundant evidence of IFPRI's role as a leading global think tank on gender issues.The broader CGIAR shares IFPRI's strong commitment to high-quality gender research. This commitment is embodied in the CGIAR Gender Impact Platform, the CGIAR Research Initiative on Gender Equality, and a network of gender research coordinators embedded in all CGIAR centers. Collectively, these efforts and their affiliated gender researchers work continuously with partners to fill gender and inclusion evidence gaps; build capacity and set directions to enable CGIAR to have maximum impact on gender equality; and promote opportunities for youth and social inclusion in agriculture and food systems.IFPRI leads the Methods Module of the Gender Platform, developing, maintaining, and disseminating tools and guides on gathering and analyzing genderdisaggregated data. Perhaps most prominently, in 2012, USAID commissioned researchers at IFPRI and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative to develop the Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI), a tool designed to measure the empowerment, agency, and inclusion of women in the agricultural sector. Over the past 11 years, the tool has been used by over 249 organizations across 60 countries to track and measure women's empowerment, and IFPRI researchers have evaluated the effectiveness of different ways to raise women's empowerment through various policies and programs.Two CGIAR research initiatives-Gender Equality and National Policies and Strategieshave partnered to launch and evaluate programming designed to raise women's ability to exercise their voice and agency in community settings. Specifically, this training manual focuses on developing the skills necessary to articulate aspirations and goals related to individual and community assets that could be built through the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) program in 1 India. The MGNREGA is a rural workfare program that guarantees a certain number of days of unskilled manual work per year to rural households at a specified minimum wage; this labor is used to create durable assets that can serve as the basis for sustainable livelihoods. Crucially, MNREGA envisions a 'bottom-up' process of deliberation, in which all members of communities have a right to participate in the village-level meetings where the shelf of works is agreed upon and are empowered to play a role in decision-making about which assets to build.The first step toward the development of this training manual was a baseline assessment conducted in early 2023. The assessment looked at women's access to information and understanding about how to request assets and whether they have tried and been successful in the past at requesting an asset. The assessment occurred with over 3,000 randomly sampled MGNREGA women job card holders in five districts across the state of Odisha (Figure 1): Balangir, Ganjam, Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, and Rayagada. These districts were chosen to represent different agroclimatic zones as well as differing levels of engagement with the MGNREGA program. • There is considerable variation across districts in whether women have ever tried to request an asset-ranging from 55 percent of our sample in Balangir to 4 percent in Mayurbhanj-but very few women have ever been successful in the past at requesting an asset. • About half of women in our sample report at least some comfort with speaking up in public but say that community officials at village-level meetings at which asset construction is discussed only pay attention to women \"to some extent.\"This suggests three significant disconnects between program goals of including communities in the process of planning for what MGNREGA assets would be built through the program and the experience of rural women. First, there is an informational gap: many women do hold ideas about assets that would be useful to them to improve their livelihoods and their resilience, but they lack specific information about how to put those ideas into practice. Second, there is a skills gap: women may hold ideas about what would be useful to them and either already know about the formal process for requesting assets or be able to quickly learn the process when provided with information. Yet, they lack the skills and confidence needed to navigate the more informal parts of community planning processes like speaking up in public fora, clearly articulating demands, and coordinating with other stakeholders in the community. Third, the assessment revealed a responsiveness gap, suggesting that local leaders and government functionaries are not always responsive to ideas even when women are able to navigate formal or informal processes to submit proposals.Based on the assessment outlined above and IFPRI's global experience working on issues related to women's empowerment in the agricultural sector, IFPRI researchers developed the current curriculum, 'Planning for Voice,' to equip women with key knowledge and skills to help them navigate the process of demanding assets through the MGNREGA. The curriculum addresses both the informational and skills gaps. It is possible that other types of interventions and programming would be needed to address the responsiveness gap; in short, information and skills may not themselves be sufficient.The curriculum is structured to work in small groups of women over the course of 2.5 hours. Women in rural areas have significant obligations on their time, including unpaid care work, and often have limited mobility. It can be difficult for them to devote extensive periods of time to attend training sessions. Often, training sessions can be quite long, taking place over the course of several full days and conducted in large groups. Further, when many strangers are brought together in a central location to discuss potentially sensitive topics, there is a need to spend considerable time during the training introducing women to each other and ensuring that they feel comfortable enough with each other to speak up and share their ideas. This type of lengthy intervention might inadvertently exclude women for whom travel to a central location is difficult and who cannot easily find someone else to assume their household and economic responsibilities for longer periods of time.By contrast, 'Planning for Voice' is designed to work with women in small groups within their existing social networks, so that each woman receives intensive focus and opportunities for practicing skills during a condensed time period. By allowing women to select friends and neighbors who can participate in the training session with them from pre-existing social groups, this format capitalizes on existing social networks and bonding amongst women, thus freeing up meeting time for content and skill development.By the end of the course, participants should be able to:• Understand the basic process for requesting a MGNREGA asset and the key local stakeholders involved • Describe a MGNREGA asset that could improve their individual lives or livelihoods or improve the community more broadly • Articulate different ways that they could play a role in influencing what their community decides to build • Develop a strategy to overcome foreseen barriers to exercising their voice and agency in their communityThe Note that in some cases, only activities (A), (B), and (C) will take place, and in other cases, all 6 activities will take place. Lists will be provided to all trainers to indicate which types of activities should be conducted with each group of women.Inviting friends• Acquire key knowledge on MGNREGA program rules and allowable community and individual assets, plus women's equal rights to participate in selecting assetsReal world examples• Reinforce key knowledge on MGNREGA program rules and allowable community and individual assets• Raise aspirations about speaking up in public and achieving the construction of assets that would be valuable • Hear about obstacles that women face to requesting assets and how they have been overcome by real women -demonstrating that 2 these aspirations are attainable• Identify and discuss barriers that women like them may face in demanding assets • Develop ideas on how barriers can be overcome This is quite a busy agenda in a condensed time period, and preparation will be key to ensure that participants can cover all of the activities and topics in the allotted time period. Facilitators are expected to be familiar with the curriculum in advance and to have reviewed all activities and modules before facilitating it. Other essential steps include congregating a small group (e.g., either by asking a target woman to identify friends/ neighbors who can join her, or otherwise tapping into existing groups to find a set of women willing to be trained); finding a safe place to conduct the training where women can have discussions in private; ensuring you select a time that works with women's schedules; having printed informational leaflets on hand; and setting up a way to screen the movies, which may vary across contexts. Ideally, a batterypowered projector will be used so that women can easily see the movie on a larger screen and so that electricity will not be required.Existing groups have substantial social capital that is known to be important for empowering women both inside and beyond their household. Even outside of formal groups with regular meetings, women often have substantial social capital in the form of friends and neighbors who can be relied upon to provide support of many formsfinancial, moral, etc. A strength of this curriculum lies in tapping this existing social capital, which can take extensive amounts of time to generate within the context of a newly-formed group of women who may not know each other very well, or may live sufficiently far away that they cannot realistically provide the type of support a woman may need.A key goal of the facilitator is identifying where this social capital lies and approaching women to sign up for training. It is not the goal of the facilitator to form groups or ask women who may not know each other at all to come together. Rather, women should be engaged in a discussion of who are friends or neighbors (they may not be family members) with whom they would like to participate in such a training. A target woman with whom a facilitator is talking may not immediately know who to name, but can be encouraged to describe: a) who are those women you rely on when you need something, or want to talk about something? b) when you wish to achieve a goal and need support from another woman, who do you consult? And c) do you participate in any groups with other women? If so, who are women in those groups with whom you regularly talk?If the woman has many more friends and neighbors than can be accommodated, the facilitator should ask the woman who among this group are the most central or important women amongst them to her own personal social network. With a list of women, the facilitator can help the woman devise the appropriate strategy to approach them -either asking the women to round them up and arrive at the training venue with the women, or recruiting some of them his/herself.It is important that women feel comfortable contributing and speaking up during the session. Some women may be naturally more vocal than others; the small groupings among known friends and neighbors are designed to ensure that even those who are naturally more reluctant to speak in large groups have a chance to practice their skills in a safe and comfortable setting. In contrast, in large groups, hesitant or shy women may successfully avoid practicing their skills and revert mostly to watching others practice. The curriculum is designed to include group activities and role play, which should provide women an opportunity to interact more freely without feeling put 'on the spot' to produce an answer about a topic where they may not yet feel knowledgeable. Further, the fact that women already have a good deal of social capital with these women should help them continue to practice and engage with the women after going home.It is a good idea to start the session by explaining the goals of the training. The facilitator should start by reading the following script to women:The following training is meant to support you, as women, to engage in the participatory process of asset selection under the MGNREGA program. You will be compensated for your time through a small snack but will not receive any cash payment. It is our intention that the training will position you to better engage with leaders, community members, and family members in ways that ensure that the MGNREGA program supports you as a woman.After you begin, it is your role as a facilitator to ensure that the session stays on topic and to redirect conversation if it veers off topic. It is also key that facilitators take care and have strategies for encouraging women who overpower conversation dynamics to listen and encouraging women who do not speak to participate. At the end of the session, you should recap 'lessons learned' and any important points made by women during the session as a reminder and to reinforce learning.At an appropriate moment during the session, women should be provided with their snack (e.g., chai and a hot food item from a local vendor).The following materials should be brought to each training:1. This manual. 2. The information leaflets (bring 5-7 to each meeting).3. Projector (ideally battery-powered) 4. A white sheet to hang on the wall. 5. Something to hang the sheet. 6. Flip chart and marker.Each module contains a mix of things that the facilitator can say or explain to the participants; things that the facilitator might ask the group, to spark conversation; and activities that the group will complete together. These are clearly marked within each module:These are things that the facilitator can say out loud to the participants, e.g., introducing a new topic or concept.These are question prompts that the facilitator should ask participants. If participants do not jump in right away, consider rephrasing the question and offering examples for participants to react to.These are activities that the facilitator will lead with the participants. Activities may involve getting up and moving around, acting, and drawing pictures. Have fun and try to get everyone participating.13*Allow 10 minutes to complete• Information leaflets.Pass out the informational leaflets to begin the session.We would like to start off our session with telling you a bit about the process for selecting assets in the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in Odisha. I have given each of you a leaflet which contains the information I am about to share with you now. This is yours to keep, and you can show it to your households, friends, and neighbors. As you know, given many of your households are MGNREGA job card holders, MGNREGA is a flagship social welfare program that aims to provide employment and livelihood security to rural households. One key component of this program is asset construction.All MGNREGA workers, that is, those who have a job card, have a right to participate in the Gram Sabha, Palli Sabha, or Ward Sabha and collectively propose the works and the order of priority to be taken up under MGNREGA for their Panchayat. Deciding which assets to select is a participatory process and all citizens, including women, have the right to give inputs. These meetings are the place where the citizens' voices are heard.You can request individual or community works under MGNREGA. Individual works are only for your household.Community Finally, small and medium farmers with less than 5 acres of land, landless and manual casual labor households are preferred.The only requirements are that their household has a job card, and at least one household member is willing to work on the project undertaken on their land or homestead.So, when can you demand assets? The process kickstarts from October 2! The Government has suggested that the Gram Panchayat level discussion and planning by ward / palli / Gram Sabha start on Gandhi Jayanti and continue over the next three months.Demands for assets can be raised at the ward and palli sabha. Speaking out gives citizens a chance to ensure their voice is heard and is necessary for their priorities to be considered and included in the annual \"action plan\" that is created as a result of these meetings.Following these meetings, a Special Gram Sabha for approval of the Gram Panchayat level annual action plan usually happens between October 3 rd and November 30 th . The Gram Panchayat then has to submit the GP level plan to the Block Panchayat by December 5 th . Timelines might be delayed this year due to the sarpanch strike. To learn about the key dates in your community, you can check with your sarpanch or Gram Rozgaar Sewak (GRS). Checking can ensure that you as women do not lose your chance to participate.For more information, speak to your GRS, ward members, or panchayat members! Their jobs include supporting all citizens, including women.This process happens every year. So, if you don't have an idea for this year, please consider an asset for next year!*Allow 20-25 minutes to complete• Projector, screen, 1 and comfortable seating arrangement for participants. Private place to screen the film away from other household members.You are about to watch a short movie. This movie-\"The Power of Voice: MGNREGA Success Stories\"-shows the stories of real women from Odisha State who participated in asset selection as part of the MGNREGA program and were able to suggest and receive an asset through the program. They will talk about their experiences in trying to obtain assets, different obstacles that they faced, and how they overcame them. We'll all watch the movie together. There will be a few key places where I'll pause the movie so that we can all talk about it.*Screen the movie. There will be 4-5 places in the film where the movie indicates that you should stop and discuss the question on the movie screen. Please ensure that you pause at these key places and discuss the questions on the screen. You should read the questions aloud to ensure that everyone understands.1 The screen could be a light-colored blank wall or a light colored bedsheet or similar.VIDEO DISCUSSION:Overcoming Barriers *Allow 10-15 minutes to complete. If discussion has been robust during the questions posed during the video, this module will be shorter. If the discussion has been relatively brief during the video itself, then this module should be extended.The objective of this module is to talk about how the themes and ideas seen in the video relate to participating women's own lives. Specifically, this discussion should focus on highlighting any barriers that the women in the video identified to achieving their asset construction goals and how they overcame those barriers. Then, participants should discuss whether they have faced any of the same challenges (or heard about others who have) and brainstorm what barriers they might face in their own lives if they were to request MGNREGA assets and how those might be overcome.Flip chart and markerThere can be a lot of different barriers that make it difficult for women to obtain MGNREGA assets that could really help their lives and improve their livelihoods.A barrier is something that makes it difficult for someone to achieve their goal.I'm going to make a chart here of some of the different barriers that women in the film identified and the strategies that they used to overcome those barriers during the participatory process of demanding a MNREGA asset. Then, I'd like you to think about other barriers that you see that women like you face to achieving the goal of demanding a MGNREGA asset, and your ideas about strategies that could be used to overcome those barriers.What Barriers Strategies -E.g., It can be difficult to speak up in a public setting -E.g., I can practice beforehand with my neighbors, my husband, and other community members and gain their support before a meeting -E.g., My husband will not agree with the asset that I would like to recommend -E.g., We can discuss our preferences beforehand, and maybe I will be surprised at his reaction. He may also keep my idea in mind for the future -E.g., I can discuss my asset preferences with a women's selfhelp group and find other women to make a project recommendation with me -E.g., Men already know what is right for us, so I do not need to speak -There are some things that women want that men care about a bit less (e.g., soak pits, toilets, fruit tree plantations, fodder cultivation for fuel, and nutrigardens), and speaking up can help them be recognized as valuable assets to women -E.g., I'm really not sure what type of project I would even recommend -I can speak to the MGNREGA functionary or other people I know about my ideas beforehand -E.g., I'm so busy with housework and childcare that I cannot find the time to do this -E.g., I can join up with other women who can help develop a proposal with me -E.g. I am not allowed to attend either the palli sabha or gram sabha -I can approach ward members with my request or persuade others (such as members of my self-help group, friends) to place my demand in the palli sabha -E.g., I feel that there is no point even asking for an asset since nobody listens to women anyway -Even if nobody tends to listen now, I can still speak up and help normalize women speaking up and feel good about that*Allow 20-30 minutes to complete.A social map provides a bird's eye view of a community, illustrating where social infrastructure is located in a community in relation to where people live and work. The purpose of this specific social map is to think about the assets that could be built through the MGNREGA program on a very localized map of where the participant lives. It should focus on the area around the participant's home and include things like their own home, neighbors' homes, roads or paths, irrigation-related infrastructure, productive farmland, pasture-land, fallow or waste land, and drainage and groundwater-related infrastructure. Because of the detailed categories, it is essential to focus on a very small geographic area nearby the homes of participating women only. Relevant MGNREGA-eligible assets for consideration are listed in the table below. Please prevent women from trying to map the entire village or a large geographic area. The objective is to really zoom in nearby to their homes to help them think about what MGNREGA assets could be useful to them.The objective of creating the map is to help women think about 'gaps' that exist near their homes where an asset allowable through the MGNREGA program could be useful to them. To think about overcoming barriers to women influencing the asset construction process, it is first important for them to think about what assets could be constructed, which they have already, and what would be most useful to them. Land leveling, pasture development, development of fallow and waste landPlantations; Horticulture supportPoultry shelters; goat or pig shelters; Other livestock promotion projectsAquaculture; fish drying yards; fishery storage facilities; Other fishery promotion projectsRural road projects Source: Compiled from MGNREGA website. Full list of allowable assets here: https://megsres.nic.in/sites/default/files/mgnrega-permissible-work-list.pdf• Explain the purpose of the exercise to the women and how it can be useful to them to think through what additional assets they might request to make their lives easier and their land more productive.• Using a flipchart and markers or other suitable drawing tools, ask the participants to identify north, south, east, and west. Then, start placing their homes on the map along with any canals, roads, or paths. If there is prominent communal infrastructure in this immediate geographic area like schools, health clinics, drinking water sources, or religious buildings, these should be added as well. This map should not cover the whole village -just the areas very near to the participants' homes.• Once the primary buildings have been identified, start talking about the land in between the buildings. Which areas are productive farmlands? Which areas may be fallow? Is there irrigation-related infrastructure around? Infrastructure to address groundwater or drainage issues? Where are existing wells, ponds, shelters, and other facilities?• As the social map is being developed, it can be used to guide women through a conversation about the absence of specific assets which may be useful to themselves, their households, their neighbors, or their communities (i.e., 'gaps'). Use the questions in the 'ask' section below to guide this conversation.• After: Take a picture of the map and share it with your supervisor.• Which types of assets or works available through MGNREGA could fill in 'gaps' in this map that would help the women in the group?• If constructed, who would be the beneficiaries, specifically?• What exactly would the benefits be? More profits? What would they do with the extra money? Keep kids in school? Buy an asset? Etc.• Take a minute to visualize how things would be if you got an asset -e.g., picture the asset, picture yourself using the asset, picture the extra income/easier work load, etc.*Allow 10-15 minutes to complete.This part of the discussion should focus on helping women to identify any goals for participating in the MGNREGA planning process and to learn how to set goals that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound.This section of the training focuses on how to set effective goals. It can be easy for any of us to say that we might like to try something new, like participating in the MGNREGA asset selection process, but doing something new can be really hard for any of us, especially when it involves multiple steps.We are all very busy, have lots of other responsibilities, and may even be unsure of ourselves • Encourage each woman to articulate out loud a SMART goal to increase their own participation in the MGNREGA asset selection process. Ideally, this can build directly from the social mapping exercise if the women have developed good ideas during that session on the types of assets that might benefit them.• Some example SMART goals could be: o I would like to recommend building a new pond between my house and my neighbor's house in time for this year's palli sabha meeting.o I would like to attend this year's palli sabha meeting and speak up in favor of an asset that I think will benefit my community.o I would like to talk to the MGNREGA functionary that serves my village so that I can advance my ideas for which asset to construct at next year's palli sabha meeting.*Allow 35-40 minutes to complete.This part of the discussion should focus on allowing women to practice speaking up and feeling comfortable expressing their views about MGNREGA assets. This section is also intended to help women think about how different people in their community might react to them and to plan how they might respond to questions. This module will include a 'role play' game, where each woman takes a turn playing the roles of: (1) herself, (2) a village official, (3) her husband, and (4) a friend. The role play activity is described below, as well as how to play if there are more or fewer than 4 participants at the training.• Encourage everyone to stand up. In this activity, each woman will play a different character. Before starting the game, it's a good idea to talk about what each character might say or do:o Woman 1 should play herself: She will be talking about an asset of her choice with people in her life and her community.o Woman 2 should play a village official. The women can choose whether this would be the MGNREGA functionary or another village leader who is important to the asset selection process (e.g. sarpanch).o Woman 3 should play Woman 1's husband, mother-in-law or another important family member who lives in Woman 1's household.o Woman 4 should play Woman 1's friend. o If there are more than 4 women, additional women should play a friend or neighbor.Someone could play the role of a self-help group member if that is relevant in the context.o If there are fewer than 4 women, the facilitator can play the role of supportive friend.• The role play game starts off with Woman 1 telling the group what type of asset she will be asking for. The facilitator should ask her: Imagine you are planning to request an asset, who do you want to talk to first among the people here (the village official, your family member, your friend / neighbor).• Woman 1 approaches the first person she chooses and says out loud what she wants. The other woman should be prompted: How do you think the person you are playing would respond to this woman's request? For example, would this person support and encourage her, worry about her going to a public meeting, ignore her or not take her seriously? The other woman should play this part.• Then Woman 1 should be prompted: How would you respond to this? Do you want to go talk to any of the other people here?o For example, if you went to the village official first, but he or she is more persuaded by men who want different assets and we all think he or she will not take you too seriously, do you want to talk to your husband or a friend next to see if you can gain their support?• Go around the room until Woman 1 has talked to each of the other women playing the other roles, thought about how they will respond, and then decided how she will respond back to them.• Rotate roles among the women until time is up for this module, trying to make room for as many of the women as possible to play Woman 1."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2367969223.json b/main/part_2/2367969223.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e049c0921a9571402ab5a7ba4e57fdeb62e786bc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2367969223.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"07b10ce6a1e4c7c06aa264f095a34784","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/bded3faa-60fd-4e69-93e7-824852552741/retrieve","id":"-149088578"},"keywords":["A 1","4","3 Perfil Las Acacias 3 Lugar/sitio: Estación Experimental Las Acacias DICTA Fecha: 30","06","2022 No","del perfil: 3 Altura: 488 m s","n","m","Tipo de suelo: Cambisol vértico Coordenadas del perfil: UTM: 0561632, 1550479 -N 14°01","453' W 086°25","643' Pendiente Plano 0-1 %"],"sieverID":"5cc949af-2778-458e-9493-4acc65309d45","content":"Este es un justo calificativo para un trabajo altamente técnico, realizado por el doctor Jürgen Bauman, con elEl levantamiento edafológico en ocho estaciones experimentales de la DICTA incluyó la descripción y caracterización de perfiles en campo, la toma de muestras por horizonte delimitado de cada perfil, y su posterior análisis en laboratorio. En las ocho estaciones, se describieron un total de 21 perfiles de suelo (Tabla 1). El conocimiento de las propiedades de suelos es básico para evaluar su capacidad de producción agropecuaria y los factores que influyen en el manejo del agua y la planeación del riego en la parcela, así como en el riesgo de erosión tanto en la parcela como en el paisaje.La observación del terreno, el levantamiento y el reconocimiento de las principales propiedades físicas y estructurales de los suelos en campo permiten a los técnicos y productores evaluar el estado de fertilidad e identificar los factores limitantes para la producción agropecuaria, con el fin de seleccionar e implementar las prácticas más adecuadas para el manejo del suelo y los cultivos.La evaluación visual se basa en la valoración de importantes propiedades del suelo, como la textura, la estructura y consistencia, el color, la porosidad y el desarrollo del sistema radicular. Todas estas son indicadores del estado de la calidad de los suelos y, a su vez, algunas como la estructura, la porosidad y el desarrollo del sistema radicular son influenciadas por el manejo y diferentes presiones de uso, por lo que proporcionan una herramienta esencial de evaluación y monitoreo (Benites, 2015;CRS, 2019;Shepherd, 2000).El primer acercamiento a un perfil de suelo es la observación visual desde el borde de la calicata hacia la pared que se va a describir. A través de una primera impresión se pueden apreciar algunos detalles importantes del perfil del suelo, como una distinción preliminar de diferentes horizontes, basada en posibles cambios de color, o la presencia de fragmentos, piedras, raíces, moteados, etc.Foto 1. Delimitación de horizontes de un perfil de sueloPosteriormente, es necesario posicionarse frente a la pared del perfil y aplanarla con una pala recta. Luego, con un cuchillo, se prepara la pared para apreciar las raíces, identificar los límites de los horizontes y resaltar sus posibles características específicas, como diferencias en la textura y la estructura. Además, también se pueden percibir y detectar las primeras diferencias en la resistencia a la penetración, incluyendo piso de arado. Todas las observaciones visuales y táctiles, en su conjunto, permiten delimitar los diferentes horizontes que componen el perfil del suelo.La resistencia mecánica del suelo se puede medir en campo con un penetrómetro de bolsillo o estimarla con una navaja. Se debe tener en cuenta que la resistencia a la penetración aumenta con el incremento del contenido de arcilla y la disminución del contenido de agua.No obstante, con algo de experiencia en campo se pueden distinguir al menos cinco niveles de resistencia mecánica del suelo. En el marco de este estudio, se estimó la resistencia a la penetración como la resistencia a la inserción de un cuchillo, medido en cm (Foto 2, Tabla 2).Foto 2. Evaluación de la resistencia a la penetración del suelo Tabla 2. Valoración de la resistencia a la penetración0,5-1,5 cm Muy alta 2,1-3,0 cm Alta 3,1-5,0 cm Media 5,1-6,0 cm Baja > 6,0 cm Muy bajaEn campo, la textura se determinó con la prueba táctil de acuerdo con la guía de la FAO (2009). En laboratorio, se analizó la textura por el método de Boyoucos de las muestras alteradas de cada horizonte, determinando las fracciones de arena, limo y arcilla. Posteriormente, se compararon las clases texturales determinadas en campo y en laboratorio. Los resultados se presentan en el Anexo A2.La intensidad de raíces se determinó de acuerdo con la guía de clasificación de suelos KA5 de Alemania (AG Boden, 2005). En el centro de cada horizonte se delimita un cuadrado de 10 cm x 10 cm para preparar y revelar las raíces finas visibles. La intensidad de las raíces se evalúa realizando un conteo de estas, y se clasifica en seis clases, desde \"muy débil\" hasta \"extremadamente fuerte\" (Tabla 3). A diferencia de la textura, la estructura del suelo es dinámica y puede cambiar debido a tensiones mecánicas, biológicas e hidráulicas como resultado de procesos naturales (clima, crecimiento de las raíces, actividades biológicas del suelo), así como por prácticas agrícolas de manejo.Una buena estructura del suelo es vital para los cultivos. Regula la aireación, el intercambio gaseoso, el movimiento y almacenamiento del agua, la temperatura, la penetración y desarrollo de las raíces, el ciclo de los nutrientes, y la resistencia a la erosión. Además, favorece la germinación y aparición de las semillas (Shepherd, 2000).Mediante observación macroscópica se distingue visualmente entre formas de estructuras no agregadas y agregadas. Las formas de estructura no agregadas son:Î La estructura de grano simple en ausencia de aglutinantes.Î La estructura coherente, que se mantiene unida por aglutinantes como la arcilla, los sesquióxidos o la cal, por lo que, en caso de solidificación por precipitación masiva de hierro y cal, también se le llama \"estructura cementada\".Las estructuras agregadas se clasifican según el modo de formación de los agregados:Î Estructura de miga (migajosa, worm casts), considerada una estructura biogénica.Î Estructuras de separación formadas por procesos naturales de segregación. En suelos arcillosos, por procesos de contracción e hinchamiento, se forman prismas y poliedros; mientras en suelos densos ricos en limo se forma una estructura laminar o de placas.Î Fragmentos de suelo producidos por la labranza (grumos y terrones).La dificultad para determinar el tipo de estructura en un horizonte de suelo radica en que su estado de formación puede variar entre \"muy pronunciado\" y \"muy indistinto\". Además, pueden haber ocurrido diferentes procesos de formación estructural simultánea o sucesiva. Como consecuencia, en algunos casos resulta complejo identificar con claridad la forma estructural; por ejemplo, en muchos suelos cultivables (capa arable) es difícil distinguir entre grumos, migas y subpoliedros (Harrach y Sauer, 2002). En la Gráfica 1, se presenta el esquema de clasificación de la estructura de suelo de acuerdo con la FAO (2009).Gráfica 1. Clasificación de tipos de estructura según la FAO El tamaño medio de los agregados se correlaciona con la densidad de compactación, es decir, los agregados pequeños predominan generalmente en un suelo suelto y los grandes en uno denso. En el caso de suelos claramente agregados, la soltura o compactación puede deducirse a simple vista.La cohesión de la estructura del suelo se comprueba mediante la prueba de caída, la cual consiste en dejar caer un bloque de suelo desde una pala, a una altura de aproximadamente 1 m, sobre una superficie firme (p. ej., tabla de madera). El impacto permite observar cómo el bloque se rompe debido a las fuerzas de caída: la tierra floja se descompone en muchos agregados de diferentes tamaños, y el suelo compactado permanece como un bloque. La porosidad se evalúa junto con la estructura del suelo. Este aspecto, y particularmente la macroporosidad, influye en el movimiento del aire y el agua en los suelos. Aquellos con una buena estructura tienen una alta porosidad entre y dentro de los agregados, mientras que los suelos con una estructura pobre pueden carecer de macroporos en los agregados grandes, dificultando su drenaje y aireación.La clasificación de los poros visibles en la pared del perfil de suelo y en los agregados de cada horizonte se realizó determinando su tamaño y abundancia, de acuerdo con la Gráfica 2 (FAO, 2009). También se debe registrar la presencia de poros o tubos de lombrices en caso de que existan. Una de las características morfológicas más importantes del suelo es el color, un indicador del cual se pueden derivar y asociar ciertas propiedades. Por ejemplo, el color negro o tonos oscuros se asocian con un alto contenido de materia orgánica y una buena estructura y actividad biológica, mientras que los colores rojos señalan la presencia de hierro e indican condiciones de alta meteorización donde predominan procesos de oxidación; el color rojo, además, se asocia a niveles bajos de fertilidad y pH ácidos. Los tonos blanquecinos pueden indicar la presencia de carbonatos de calcio; los olivos, verdes o grises, la falta de oxígeno y un mal drenaje. Por su parte, el color entre amarillo y marrón amarillento es señal de una meteorización bajo condiciones aerobias (oxidación) con la presencia de óxidos hidratados de Fe3+, y se relaciona con condiciones de media a baja fertilidad del suelo (SENA, 2013). Para la determinación del color se emplea la tabla de colores Munsell (Foto 4). La tabla Munsell se compone de varias hojas, cada una representando un matiz o tono específico (Hue), indicado en la parte superior derecha de la página. Cada hoja tiene una serie de plaquitas de colores, dispuestas de manera sistemática para representar la claridad (value) y la pureza (chroma). Las divisiones de claridad (value) se organizan verticalmente, aumentando su valor y haciéndose más claras de abajo hacia arriba. Por su parte, las divisiones de pureza (chroma) se disponen horizontalmente en la parte inferior de la hoja, incrementándose de izquierda a derecha. La medición del color se realiza en el campo, tanto en condiciones de suelo seco como húmedo.La detección de manchas, moteados y concreciones de hierro y manganeso indica un problema del drenaje interno del suelo, y que hay periodos más o menos prolongados en los que la aireación y el intercambio gaseoso son deficientes. Se produce una alternancia entre las fases reductoras y oxidativas. El enraizamiento en estos horizontes puede estar fuertemente limitado. Las siguientes fotos muestran ejemplos de manchas y moteados de manganeso (izquierda), mezcla de moteados de hierro y manganeso (centro) y un nódulo de manganeso (derecha).Foto 5. Moteados, concreciones y nódulos de manganeso y hierroDe cada horizonte se tomó una muestra alterada de aproximadamente 1 kg de suelo. Además, se tomaron tres muestras volumétricas con un cilindro metálico para determinar la densidad aparente de cada horizonte.Foto 6. Pasos para la preparación de una muestra volumétrica en cilindroLos análisis químicos y de textura se llevaron a cabo en el laboratorio de la Zamorano. De cada muestra alterada, seca y tamizada se analizaron los siguientes parámetros: Î Carbono orgánico (% CO): Método de Walkley & Black. El contenido de materia orgánica (MO) se calculó por multiplicación con en el factor 1,72.Î N total (%): 5 % de MO.Î pH: 1:1 en agua en el rango de pH 4,00 -pH 10,00.Î Bases intercambiables (K, Ca, Mg, Na): solución extractora acetato de amonio pH 7,0, determinados por espectrofotometría de absorción atómica.Î Capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC): extracción con acetato de amonio pH 7,0, determinación por volumetría.Î Fósforo disponible: solución extractora Mehlich 3.Î Textura: método de Bouyoucos.Foto 7. Secado de muestras alteradas al aire (izquierda) y secado de muestras volumétricas a 105 °C (derecha) en DICTA La densidad aparente se determinó en el laboratorio de DICTA en Tegucigalpa. De cada horizonte se tomaron tres repeticiones de muestras volumétricas inalteradas.En este capítulo, se presentan resultados sintetizados de diferentes parámetros que ofrecen una visión general de los sitios y perfiles, y permiten comparar algunas características importantes entre ellos para llegar a conclusiones tanto específicas como generales.En relación a la acidez de los suelos, existen diferencias considerables entre las estaciones, variando entre suelos con un pH fuertemente ácido en las estaciones Opatoro y Santa Catarina, una reacción de pH neutro en La Concepción y La Lujosa, así como un pH alcalino en Omonita y Las Acacias (Tabla 4). Los valores mínimos en los sitios corresponden a los horizontes superficiales de cada perfil, mientras los valores máximos se encuentran a mayor profundidad en los horizontes del subsuelo. Esto es un indicio de la lixiviación de bases de los horizontes superficiales, principalmente de calcio (Ca) y magnesio (Mg), por el régimen pluvial, con lluvias anuales entre 1.000 mm y 2.000 mm (con excepción de Playitas: 800 mm). Además, se observa que las estaciones Opatoro y Santa Catarina -de mayor acidez -están ubicadas por encima de 1.700 m s. n. m., en la zona montañosa de La Paz e Intibucá, donde dominan los suelos ácidos. SAG DICTA publicó un manual de referencia para el manejo de este tipo de suelos en las zonas altas de Honduras (Toledo, 2016). A partir de los resultados del porcentaje de materia orgánica por horizonte, se calculó el porcentaje promedio en los primeros 30 cm de cada perfil. Como se muestra en la Gráfica 3, el porcentaje de materia orgánica es bajo, con excepción de cinco perfiles que muestran niveles medios alrededor de 2,0-2,5 %, y solo un perfil que presenta un valor por encima de 4,0 %.Los perfiles con los porcentajes de materia orgánica de suelo (MOS) más bajos son La Lujosa 1 y Ramón Villeda Morales 3 (Ocotepeque 3), con solamente 0,8 % de MOS; ambos suelos se caracterizan por una textura entre arenosa y franco arenosa -alto contenido de arena (60-92 %). Los demás perfiles en La Lujosa (2, 3, 4) presentan una textura favorable, entre franco y franco limosa/arcillosa; no obstante, también muestran contenidos bajos de materia orgánica, de 1,4 a 1,8 %. Un clima como el de la estación La Lujosa, caracterizado por una precipitación alta y una temperatura promedio anual elevada, favorece la descomposición y mineralización de la materia orgánica. De acuerdo con Valenzuela y Visconti (2018), en el clima cálido el índice de humificación es considerablemente mayor, lo que significa que los suelos tienen una capacidad superior para descomponer, mineralizar y humificar la materia orgánica del suelo. Por otro lado, los suelos con mayor contenido de materia orgánica se encuentran en la estación Santa Catarina, ubicada a una altura de 1.710 m s. n. m., con una temperatura promedio anual de 17,9 °C y suelos ácidos. Esto coincide, entre otros, con el estudio de Orellana Bojórquez (2003) en la zona con un clima templado de montaña en el occidente de Honduras. Con los valores de la densidad aparente (DA) se calculó el contenido de carbono orgánico para cada horizonte y, posteriormente, el promedio para los primeros 30 cm del suelo superficial, expresado en kg/m 2 (multiplicado x 10 = t/ha). Como se muestra en la Gráfica 4, solamente en los perfiles de suelos de Santa Catarina, La Concepción y Playitas 4 se observa un contenido de 5,0 kg/m 2 o mayor (≥ 50 t/ha). Los contenidos más bajos se encuentran en las Estaciones Experimentales La Lujosa (16-37 t/ha), Ocotepeque (18-43 t/ha) y Omonita (30-35 t/ha), donde dominan los suelos livianos con texturas arenosas y franco arenosas, así como en Opatoro (20 t/ha).De acuerdo con Powlson et al. (2022) y Poulton et al. (2018), es difícil lograr aumentos considerables del carbono orgánico del suelo (COS) en suelos agrícolas. No obstante, incluso pequeños incrementos pueden tener efectos positivos y notablemente grandes en diversas propiedades del suelo.En una revisión de los impactos de la retención de rastrojo de cereales en el carbono del suelo, Powlson et al. (2011) destacan que, en la mayoría de los casos, el impacto sobre el contenido del COS total fue pequeño. Sin embargo, en algunos casos en los que prácticamente no se produjo un aumento medible del COS total, se lograron mejoras sustanciales en las propiedades biológicas, como el contenido de carbono de la biomasa microbiana, o en las características físicas, como la estabilidad de los agregados y la tasa de infiltración de agua.También Poeplau et al. (2022) y Bolinder et al. (2020) destacan que los efectos del manejo agrícola sobre las reservas de COS, como la labranza, la fertilización, la gestión de residuos o la rotación de cultivos, son relativamente pequeños, oscilando entre < 0,1-0,5 t C ha/año. De igual forma, señalan que la detección de cambios significativos en el COS puede llevar varios años, dependiendo de los efectos de un determinado tratamiento y de la variabilidad del contenido inicial de fondo del COS.Cuantificando el efecto a largo plazo (28-36 años) del manejo de rastrojo en la producción de cereales sobre el carbono orgánico del suelo, Schjønning (2023) demostró que la incorporación de rastrojo provocó el aumento del carbono orgánico a lo largo del tiempo: entre 13 y 15 % en suelos arenosos y franco arenosos. Otro efecto positivo del rastrojo fue la disminución de la densidad aparente del suelo y el incremento de la capacidad de almacenamiento de agua disponible para las plantas.Revisando diversos estudios, Bolinder et al. (2020) señala que, con la aplicación de estiércol y su combinación con fertilizante mineral, el aumento en el COS osciló entre 23,5 y 43,4 %, mostrando un rango de valores de 203 a 1.310 kg C ha -1 año -1 (0,2-1,3 t/ha/año). Sin embargo, el efecto de los materiales orgánicos reciclados sobre el COS varía en función de la cantidad y calidad de estos. Muchas prácticas recomendadas para aumentar las reservas de carbono orgánico lo hacen a tasas inferiores a 0,5-1 t de C ha -1 ; mientras que, en muchos suelos, las reservas de COS \"de fondo\" pueden estar en el rango de 30-90 t de C ha -1 solo en los 20-30 cm superiores. Esto significa que un aumento potencial de hasta 1 t ha -1 de COS es equivalente a un aumento anual de 1 % o menos del stock total de COS. Por lo cual, se requieren intervalos de medición de 5 años o más para detectar cambios acumulativos del stock de COS que sean estadísticamente significativos (Paustian et al., 2019).En la Gráfica 5, se presentan de manera comparativa los niveles de la capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC), con valores mínimos y máximos de cada perfil. Con excepción de los perfiles Omonita 1, Omonita 2 y La Lujosa 1, los valores mínimos corresponden a los horizontes superficiales, mientras los valores máximos se encuentran en los horizontes B, BC y C del subsuelo. En Omonita, se refleja el aporte de sedimentos de las últimas inundaciones causadas por los huracanes Eta y Iota.La Gráfica 5 muestra que la mayoría de los perfiles se caracterizan por niveles medios y medio-altos, entre 20 y 45 Cmol c kg -1 (Anexo 5.1), con excepción de Ocotepeque 3 y La Concepción, que muestran niveles bajos desde el horizonte superficial hasta el subsuelo. Los perfiles con una CIC media alta homogénea en todos los horizontes son La Lujosa 2, La Lujosa 4 y Playitas 3.No obstante, con respecto a la fertilidad de los suelos, es necesario conocer el estado de las bases intercambiables de calcio, magnesio y potasio, así como la saturación de bases de la CIC total, la cual, dependiendo del pH, puede variar considerablemente. Además, son importantes las relaciones entre las bases, debido a que indican si hay posibles deficiencias de alguno de estos elementos, lo cual debe considerar en la estrategia de fertilización (Anexo 6.3). Gráfica 5. Niveles de la capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC) en los suelos de las estacionesEn la Tabla 5, se muestra el nivel de los cationes intercambiables de cada perfil, así como el nivel de la suma total de calcio, magnesio y potasio con su valoración (Anexo 5.1). Con respecto al rango indicado, el mínimo corresponde al horizonte del perfil con el valor más bajo, y el rango máximo al horizonte con el valor más alto. De acuerdo con la suma de los cationes intercambiables, 12 perfiles se caracterizan por presentar niveles de \"alto\" a \"muy alto\", entre ellos los de las estaciones Omonita, Las Acacias, Playitas y La Lujosa. El grupo de perfiles con niveles bajos y medios se encuentra en las estaciones Opatoro, Santa Catarina, La Concepción y Ocotepeque.Los contenidos de calcio, magnesio y potasio, expresados en kg/ha en los primeros 30 cm de cada perfil, se presentan en la Gráfica 6. Se evidencia que los perfiles Opatoro, Santa Catarina 1 y 2, así como Ocotepeque 1 y 4, muestran los niveles más bajos de calcio, con un reservorio Los perfiles de las estaciones Playitas y Omonita, así como Ocotepeque 4, se caracterizan por un contenido del reservorio intercambiable de potasio muy alto, entre 1.678 kg/ha (Ocotepeque 4) y 4.760 kg/ha (Playitas 2). Se destaca que en la estación Ocotepeque los perfiles varían considerablemente en su contenido, entre un nivel medio y muy alto. Lo mismo se observa en la estación Santa Catarina, con una variación entre 419 kg/ha en el perfil Santa Catarina 2 y 1.127 kg/ha en Santa Catarina 1. En la estación La Lujosa, tres perfiles muestran un nivel alto, con contenidos superiores a 1.000 kg/ha (1.183-1.369 kg/ha), mientras los suelos en la estación Las Acacias varían en un rango de 500 a 1.000 kg/ha -nivel medio-bajo a medio-alto. En relación al perfil en Opatoro, presenta un contenido de potasio de 1.581 kg/ha, un nivel alto en comparación con sus contenidos de calcio y magnesio.En relación al magnesio (Mg) intercambiable, destacan los tres perfiles en la estación Las Acacias, así como La Lujosa 2 y Playitas 3, con valores por encima de 2.000 kg/ha (2.343-3.176 kg/ha). El reservorio más bajo se encuentra en Opatoro, con 281 kg/ha, mientras los perfiles en Santa Catarina, Omonita y Ocotepeque contienen entre 400 y 1.000 kg/ha, es decir, niveles medios a medio-altos. La Concepción, Playitas 1, 2 y 3 y La Lujosa 4 se caracterizan por presentar niveles altos, entre 1.000 y 2.000 kg/ha. Mg K Gráfica 6. Contenidos de Ca, Mg y K en kg ha -1 en los primeros 30 cm de cada perfilLos valores de fósforo (P) disponibles, de acuerdo con el método Mehlich 3, varían en un rango amplio entre los perfiles. No se observa un patrón claro de diferenciación entre las estaciones, salvo en el perfil de la estación Opatoro, que muestra el nivel más bajo con solo 2 mg/kg (partes por millón), y en el perfil La Concepción, con un valor de 100 mg/kg, el más alto de todos los perfiles analizados. El bajo nivel en la estación de Opatoro está directamente relacionado con el suelo tipo andosol, en cuyas propiedades químicas y mineralógicas se encuentra una alta fijación de fósforo. Por otra parte, el valor extremo en la estación La Concepción se relaciona con la práctica de fertilización en la parcela. De los 18 perfiles analizados (no hay valores de fósforo para la estación Las Acacias), cuatro presentan valores altos, por encima de 30 mg/kg; seis muestran valores de fósforo bajo, menores a 15 mg/kg; y ocho se ubican en un nivel medio, entre 15 y 30 mg/kg. Se observa que en las estaciones La Lujosa, Playitas y Ocotepeque los niveles de fósforo varían de bajo a alto entre los perfiles, indicando que hay diferencias en el manejo y la fertilización.Los contenidos de fósforo (P) en kg por hectárea se muestran en la Gráfica 8. Los valores indican que la mayoría de los perfiles cuentan con un contenido considerable de fósforo que el suelo puede aportar a los cultivos. Destacan los perfiles La Concepción y La Lujosa 1, así como Playitas 1 y 2, cada uno con más de 100 kg/ha de fósforo disponible para los cultivos. La capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu) para los cultivos es una característica de mayor importancia ante posibles periodos secos y prolongados durante el ciclo del cultivo. La CCu es uno de los aspectos que define el potencial productivo de los suelos, así como su resiliencia ante efectos de la variabilidad climática.La capacidad de almacenamiento de agua aprovechable para la vegetación y los cultivos depende de la textura, la densidad aparente, el contenido de materia orgánica y la profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento del suelo. La relación entre los diferentes tipos de poros del suelo y el estado del agua se presenta en la Tabla 6.La estimación de la capacidad de campo de agua utilizable (CCu) se realizó de acuerdo con las tablas de referencia establecidas por Wessolek et al. (2009, Parámetros físicos del suelo y métodos de cálculo para la práctica), que consideran las clases texturales de la KA5 alemana (AG Boden, 2005), la densidad aparente y el contenido de materia orgánica. Las tablas de Wessolek para el cálculo de la CCu se presentan en el Anexo 4. La guía para la cartografía del suelo KA5 de Alemania (AG Boden, 2005) distingue un total de 32 clases de textura, en comparación con la clasificación de USDA y WRB, las cuales consideran 12 clases texturales. La comparación de ambas clasificaciones se presenta en el Anexo 3.2.La estimación de la CCu de cada perfil comprende los siguientes pasos:1. Para cada horizonte de un perfil, se determinó la clase de textura de acuerdo con la KA5 (Anexo 3.1).Con base en la tabla del Anexo 4.1, se determina la capacidad de campo utilizable en porcentaje de volumen, de acuerdo con la clase de textura y dependiendo de la densidad aparente en suelos de < 1 % de materia orgánica.3. Para los horizontes con un valor mayor a 1 % de materia orgánica, se toma el valor de ajuste de la tabla del Anexo 4.2.Para cada horizonte de un perfil, se calculó el volumen de CCu, sumando los volúmenes hasta una profundidad de 100 cm de cada perfil.La capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu) en mm para el cultivo a un metro de profundidad de cada perfil se muestra en la Gráfica 9. A esta profundidad, los mm son equivalentes a litros/m 2 de superficie de suelo. La CCu varía entre un mínimo de 101 mm (litros) en el perfil Ocotepeque 3 y un máximo de 221 mm (litros) en Omonita 1. La capacidad de almacenamiento de agua aprovechable para los cultivos en el perfil Ocotepeque 3 está reducida por un horizonte pedregoso en este perfil, mientras el perfil Omonita 1 se caracteriza por una textura favorable, entre franco arcillosa y franco limosa, en todos sus horizontes.De los 21 perfiles, nueve muestran un nivel medio de CCu, entre 90 y 140 mm; diez presentan un nivel alto, entre 141 y 200 mm; y dos se caracterizan por una CCu muy alta, superior a 200 mm (Tabla 7).La variación más amplia entre los perfiles de una estación se observa en La Lujosa, con un rango entre 128 y 204 mm. Los cuatro perfiles en la estación Playitas oscilan en un rango más estrecho, entre 118 y 141 mm. Los perfiles en Las Acacias muestran una variación limitada dentro de un nivel alto, entre 153 y 186 mm. En esta zona predominan los cultivos de altura como hortalizas (crucíferas), café, fresa, mora silvestre, durazno, manzana y otros típicos de este territorio como el frijol chinapopo y el maíz de montaña de 240 días de siembra (dds).Casi en su totalidad, el tipo de agricultura que se practica es la agricultura extensiva, migratoria y de temporada, con pocas prácticas de conservación de suelos. Los datos climáticos de precipitación y temperatura se obtuvieron de la plataforma Agua de Honduras, correspondiendo a la microcuenca 0510129, dentro de la cual se ubica la Estación Experimental Santa Cruz de Opatoro (Imagen 2).La temperatura promedio anual es de 21,2 °C, con una variación mensual entre 19,6 °C en el mes de diciembre y de 23,4 °C en abril; no obstante, la temperatura máxima media en este último mes alcanza 30,7 °C. La máxima media anual es 27,1 °C, y la mínima media anual 15,2 °C. En todos los meses del año se registran temperaturas mínimas por debajo de 20 °C (Tabla 9).La precipitación media anual en la microcuenca es alrededor de 1.830 mm. Los meses de menor precipitación son febrero y marzo. En abril ya se nota un incremento de lluvia, alcanzando un promedio de 49,3 mm, cuadruplicándose en el mes de mayo a 201 mm. El mes de mayor lluvia es junio, con un promedio de 259 mm.La temporada de lluvias se extiende hasta noviembre, aunque en diciembre la precipitación todavía alcanza un promedio de 111 mm de lluvia. Es un clima tipo Aw, de acuerdo con la clasificación de Köppen, debido a que ningún mes presenta temperaturas medias inferiores a 18 grados, las precipitaciones anuales son superiores a la evaporación y la precipitación del mes más seco es inferior a la fórmula [100-(precipitación anual/25)].Imagen 2. Ubicación de la estación experimental dentro de la microcuenca 0510129Microcuenca: 0510129 El perfil de Santa Cruz Opatoro se ubica en la zona de los andosoles, suelos desarrollados sobre cenizas volcánicas, delimitados en el mapa de Suelos de Honduras -elaborado por C. Simmons -como la serie de suelos Milile (FAO, 1969). De acuerdo con Simmons, los suelos Milile \"son suelos profundos bien drenados, formados sobre cenizas volcánicas. 0cupan un relieve fuertemente ondulado o colinoso, con pendientes que, por la mayor parte, son inferiores a 30 por ciento. Se presentan con frecuencia en amplias cimas montañosas, a altitudes de más de 1.400 m. Las temperaturas son relativamente bajas a tal altitud y a menudo se forman nubes\". Además, destaca: \"En muchos lugares, especialmente en las altitudes más elevadas, el suelo superficial es más espeso y más rico en materia orgánica. A altitudes superiores a 1.700 m es franco cenagoso. En muchas partes, el subsuelo es una arcilla pardo rojiza (2,5YR 3/6 en húmedo). La roca básica observada en este perfil no se presenta con frecuencia, pero a profundidades mayores de 1,5 m puede encontrarse una arcilla roja y moteada reticularmente y gris clara\". El mapa de suelos de Honduras de Simmons fue digitalizado en 1998 por CIAT para incluirlo en el Atlas de Honduras. Una propuesta de actualizacion fue realizada posteriormente por Brito Mijares y Sarmiento Hernandez (2012).En un estudio sobre la agricultura migratoria en los municipios de Guajiquiro y Opatoro, Felber y Foletti (1988) presentan los datos de las propiedades químicas y físicas de dos andosoles en el municipio de Opatoro. Un perfil fue ubicado en Buena Vista y otro en la Laguna. Desafortunadamente, no están georreferenciadas con sus coordenadas exactas.Los suelos tipo andosol presentan características particulares en comparación con otros tipos de suelos, como una baja densidad aparente (DA) -menor a 0,9 -, y una alta retención de fósforo -mayor a 85 % (propiedades ándicas) -, que está ligada al contenido de material amorfo y otros minerales de bajo grado de ordenamiento (alófanas e imogolita). A menudo, las capas superficiales con propiedades ándicas contienen una elevada cantidad de materia orgánica (≥ 5 %), son comúnmente muy oscuras (colores Munsell con brillo y croma en húmedo ≤ 3), y presentan una textura franco limosa o más fina.Los suelos tipo andosol en pendientes bajo bosque, por sus características físicas y químicas, prestan importantes servicios ecosistémicos e hidrológicos. En su estado conservado, almacenan elevadas cantidades de carbono orgánico y su alta porosidad favorece la infiltración y la recarga de acuíferos. El cambio de uso de suelo hacia cultivos agrícolas requiere la implementación de prácticas de conservación de suelo y agua (ver Ludrenson Lucien ST-PHAR, 2017; COSUDE y SAG-DICTA, 2022).A pesar de un contenido alto de materia orgánica en el horizonte Ah (5,49 %) del perfil en Santa Cruz de Opatoro, en los primeros 10 cm los análisis muestran una fertilidad baja y restricciones por una reacción fuertemente ácida. Aunque la capacidad de intercambio catiónico es alta, el contenido y la saturación de bases es baja a muy baja. No obstante, los valores muy bajos de fósforo indican una alta capacidad de fijación por material amorfo. El perfil de Santa Cruz de Opatoro cumple con algunos criterios principales para clasificar el suelo como un Dystric Andosol. Sin embargo, el cambio brusco del relativamente alto contenido de materia orgánica en el horizonte Ah a valores muy bajos en los horizontes subyacentes puede ser un indicio de que el perfil haya sido sometido a procesos de erosión durante las últimas décadas (ver perfiles descritos por Felber y Foletti, 1988). Por otro lado, el perfil muestra algunas características de un Nitisol, como el alto contenido de arcilla (la textura en campo puede parecer limosa), y una aparente estructura blocosa con la formación de grietas anchas y profundas en estado seco (Foto 9). No obstante, en estado húmedo (Foto 8), el perfil se caracteriza por una estructura friable y migajosa en los horizontes Bw1 y Bw2, y subangular blocosa en el BC. A las condiciones de formación de grietas en andosoles en estado de secamiento, se hace referencia en los trabajos de Alvarado et. al. (2014), Zúñiga et. al. (2016), Armas Espinel et. al. (2003) y Pérez Echavarría et. al (2017). Desafortunadamente, no se pudo realizar la prueba de fluoruro de sodio (NaF) ni en campo ni en laboratorio -de acuerdo con Fields y Perrot -para la detección de alófanas, y de esta manera la comprobación definitiva de propiedades ándicas. Las características de propiedades ándicas y del horizonte diagnóstico nítico se presentan en la base de referencia mundial para los suelos (IUSS Working Group WRB, 2022).El perfil Santa Cruz de Opatoro se caracteriza por una densidad aparente (DA) baja que varía entre 0,74 en el horizonte Bw1 y 0,88 en el horizonte Ah. Esto a la vez determina un alto volumen total de poros del suelo, entre 66,8 y 72,1 % (Tabla 10).CARACTERÍSTICAS El perfil muestra una alta profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento, con una intensidad de raíces extremadamente fuerte (W6, > 50 raíces/dm 2 ) en el horizonte Ah, muy fuerte (W5, 21-50 raíces/ dm 2 ) en el horizonte Bw1 -hasta una profundidad de 51 cm -, y mediana (W3, 6-10 raíces/dm 2 ) en el Bw2 -hasta una profundidad de 81 cm. En el horizonte subyacente BC, la intensidad de raíces se reduce a muy débil. La alta densidad de raíces en los primeros dos horizontes se relaciona con una estructura de worm casts y migas hasta una profundidad de 81 cm (Anexo 1.1).A pesar de estas propiedades favorables, la resistencia a la penetración varía entre alta (Ah, Bw1) y media-alta (Bw2, BC). Además, en todos los horizontes se observan moteados y concreciones de manganeso, aisladas en el horizonte Ah y aumentando con mayor intensidad en los horizontes subyacentes Bw1 y Bw2. En el horizonte BC, los moteados y concreciones presentan su máximo y alcanzan tamaños entre 0,5 y 2,0 cm, lo que indica que la aireación del perfil es temporalmente insuficiente. Debido a la textura con un alto contenido de arcilla, la capacidad de aire que está determinada por la fracción de poros de drenaje rápido (diámetro equivalente > 50 μm, pF < 1,8) puede estar reducida, lo que, en combinación con un régimen de alta pluviosidad y saturación temporal del suelo con agua, puede expresarse en la aparición de concreciones de manganeso. Esto, además, coincide o puede ser un indicio de las observaciones de Simmons (FAO, 1969), según las cuales los andosoles a altitudes superiores a 1.700 m s. n. m. muestran una textura franco \"cenagosa\".Con respecto a las características químicas del perfil, presenta un pH fuertemente ácido, entre pH 5,06 y pH 5,31. El contenido de materia orgánica en el horizonte Ah es alto (5,49 %), mientras los horizontes subyacentes presentan valores por debajo de 0,5 %. El nivel de fósforo disponible también es muy bajo, con valores entre 1 y 4 mg/kg (Tabla 12), indicando un alto nivel de fijación de fósforo. Santa Catarina, La Esperanza, IntibucáLa Estación Experimental Santa Catarina, al igual que la estación de Opatoro, está orientada a manejar cultivos de altura, propios de estas zonas. Está enclavada en la meseta de La Esperanza e Intibucá, con topografías que van desde planas y moderadas, hasta pendientes por encima de 30 % de inclinación. Debido a las características de topografía, clima, suelo, humedad relativa, precipitación, pH, altura, entre otras, el cultivo predominante de esta zona es la papa (perteneciente a la familia de las solanáceas), la cual se ha convertido en el principal rubro de explotación y representa hasta el 50 % de la producción nacional. Otros cultivos como el café, las crucíferas, el repollo, el brócoli y la coliflor, así como frutales de climas templados, rosáceas (mora y frambuesa silvestre) y maíz de montaña de fotoperiodo largo (mayor a los 240 dds), también tienen un excelente potencial de producción en la zona.Los suelos presentan poca materia orgánica en los horizontes subyacentes al horizonte A, posiblemente como resultado del poco o mal manejo de las prácticas agrícolas en materia de conservación. Estos suelos han sido explotados y sobreexplotados extensivamente, empleando agricultura migratoria y sin cultivos de cobertura como enmiendas de rastrojos, prácticas que podrían devolver un porcentaje de materia orgánica al suelo. Los municipios de La Esperanza e Intibucá están situados en la parte más montañosa y alta de Honduras, superando los 1.700 metros sobre el nivel del mar. Según el mapa geológico de Honduras, el departamento de Intibucá se encuentra en una zona estratigráfica del grupo Padre Miguel, que está formada por rocas piroclásticas asociadas de tipo riolítico y andesítico, tobas, basaltos, y parcialmente cenizas volcánicas (FUNIDE, 2008). Considerando esta heterogeneidad geológica y una topografía de pendientes variadas, desde casi planas (meseta de La Esperanza) hasta muy escarpadas, también se determina una alta variabilidad espacial de los suelos.Es importante mencionar que, alrededor de la ciudad La Esperanza, se encuentran yacimientos de obsidiana, un vidrio volcánico amorfo que fue un importante material utilizado por los grupos precolombinos para manufacturar artefactos y herramientas cortantes. Se reportaron grandes concentraciones y farallones de obsidiana (localización geológica individual en donde se da una concentración de obsidiana, [Sorensen y Hirth, 1984]) -en bruto y trabajada -en las bajas montañas cercanas a Quiaterique, 4 km al noroeste de La Esperanza, y alrededor del Cerro El Cedral, entre otros sitios. De acuerdo con Sorensen y Hirth (1984), las exploraciones arqueológicas han descubierto que la obsidiana fue objeto de amplio comercio en todo Honduras, por lo menos desde el año 700 al 900 a.C.Un vestigio de un taller de la manufactura de obsidiana* se encontró en la parcela de la estación experimental donde se ubica el perfil 2 (Fotos 10a y 10b).*Un taller de obsidiana es definido como un lugar donde se trabajó la obsidiana, dejando como resultado una gran concentración de desperdicios, núcleos descartados y artefactos quebrados durante el proceso de manufactura (Sorensen y Hirth, 1984).Fotos 10a y 10b. Artefactos de obsidiana en la parcela del perfil 2 en la estación Santa CatarinaSegún el sistema Köppen, el clima de La Esperanza se clasifica como Cwb: templado con inviernos secos (Clasificación climática de Köppen -Meteo Navarra). Esto se debe a que la precipitación del mes más seco del invierno (febrero) es inferior a una décima parte de la precipitación del mes más húmedo (septiembre), y a que el verano es fresco, con una temperatura media en el mes más cálido (abril) que no supera los 22 °C. Además, las temperaturas medias superan los 10 °C al menos cuatro meses al año. La temperatura media anual en La Esperanza es de 17,9 °C, con una variación de las medias mensuales entre 16,3 °C en enero y 19,4 °C en abril.Los datos de la estación meteorológica La Esperanza muestran un promedio anual de 1.395 mm de lluvia en el periodo de 1990 a 2022. La temporada lluviosa inicia en el mes de abril y termina en octubre. En promedio, los meses de mayor precipitación son junio y septiembre. La Tabla 16 presenta los valores de lluvia y temperatura mensual y anual registrados en el periodo mencionado. La Estación Experimental Santa Catarina se ubica dentro de la microcuenca 2405005 (Agua de Honduras), que forma parte de la subcuenca Negro Chinacla, dentro la cuenca del río Lempa. La microcuenca abarca un área de 1.364 ha, con un perímetro de 23,5 km. La altitud varía entre 1.665 y 1.981 m s. n. m.El perfil de suelo Santa Catarina 1 (Foto 11) muestra un horizonte Ap en los primeros 20 cm, con una textura arcillosa (Tabla 18) y una estructura migajosa del suelo suelto, en el cual están incorporados terrones de 6 a 12 cm. El suelo flojo presenta una baja resistencia a la penetración, mientras los terrones son duros y muestran una alta resistencia. La intensidad de raíces se califica como mediana (W3), y los poros visibles como muy finos/comunes. Además, se observan algunas concreciones finas y aisladas de manganeso. El color del suelo cambia de marrón muy oscuro en estado húmedo a marrón amarillento oscuro en su estado seco.El olor que se percibe del suelo humedecido es un sutil aroma a tierra orgánica. El horizonte subyacente es un horizonte de transición AB que muestra el mismo color marrón muy oscuro en estado húmedo, y el cual se distingue del Ap principalmente por su estructura subangular blocosa que presenta una alta resistencia a la penetración y un ligero cambio en la textura -de franco arcillosa a más franca. La intensidad de raíces se califica como mediana, y los poros visibles como muy finos/pocos a finos/comunes. Se sigue percibiendo un olor muy sutil a tierra, pero menor que en el horizonte superior. La EsperanzaEl siguiente horizonte B (39-59 cm) se caracteriza también por una estructura subangular blocosa media abierta con agredados de 3 a 8 cm, y una textura de franco limosa a franco limosa arenosa. La intensidad de raíces se mantiene como mediana (W3), y con poros muy finos/pocos. Es notable el cambio de color: marrón rojizo (5YR 4/4) en condiciones de suelo húmedo, y marrón fuerte en suelo seco (7.5YR 4/6). Se observan algunas concreciones de manganeso en la matriz de los agregados, así como granos muy pequeños de cuarzo. El material de suelo de este horizonte es inodoro (Anexo 1.2.1).En el siguiente horizonte de transición BC, se observa una reducción en la intensidad de raíces a un nivel débil (W2). Se nota un ligero aumento de arena fina, determinando en campo una textura franco limo arcillosa. La estructura sigue siendo subangular blocosa media abierta entre los agregados. La resistencia a la penetración se reduce ligeramente en comparación con el horizonte suprayacente. Lo que es notorio en el horizonte BC es la apariencia abundante de concreciones y moteados de manganeso. Además, se observa un aumento en el valor de la densidad aparente, de 1,20 en el horizonte B a 1,32 en el horizonte BC. El color cambia a un marrón fuerte tanto en condiciones de suelo húmedo como seco (7.5YR 4/6; 7.5YR 5/6) (Anexo 1.2.1).El horizonte C muestra un cambio de textura notable, siendo esta más arenosa, y una estructura subangular blocosa con agregados entre 2 y 8 cm. La resistencia a la penetración es alta. No se observan poros y la intensidad de raíces es muy débil (W1). Además, se nota un cambio de color, siendo marrón amarillento oscuro en suelo húmedo y marrón amarillento en estado seco. En comparación con el horizonte BC, ya no se observan concreciones de manganeso. De hecho, el cambio de textura entre ambos horizontes -de una textura fina a una más gruesa -puede explicar la apariencia de las concreciones de manganeso en el horizonte BC: la textura gruesa del C funge como una barrera capilar en condiciones de saturación temporal de los horizontes superiores, lo que por periodos cortos puede causar condiciones oxido-reductoras. Por sus características físicas y químicas, el perfil se clasifica como un Haplic Acrisol. El perfil Santa Catarina 2 (Foto 12) muestra en los primeros 13 cm un horizonte Ap con una gran densidad de raíces (W4) y un olor intenso a tierra. Tiene una estructura migajosa (worm casts), con muy baja resistencia a la penetración. La textura es franco limosa. El suelo en estado húmedo muestra un color marrón muy oscuro (7,5 YR 2.5/2), y en seco un marrón grisáceo intenso (10 YR 4/2). El horizonte de transición AB (13-23 cm) se caracteriza por una estructura migajosa-coherente, fácilmente desmoronable, y una textura franco arcillosa (Tabla 19). Se observan pocos poros muy finos, algunos de lombriz. La intensidad de raíces se reduce a un nivel débil (W2) y, al mismo tiempo, se aumenta la resistencia a la penetración. Además, se observan algunas concreciones de manganeso (Anexo 1.2.2).la superficie, así como pocas concreciones de manganeso. La reducida apariencia de poros visibles en los agregados, la presencia de concreciones de manganeso que gradualmente aumentan a lo largo del perfil, al igual que la desaparición de raíces finas, son indicios de una hidráulica interna reducida y de una profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento medio-baja. Debido a las características diagnósticas de los diferentes horizontes a lo largo del perfil, así como a sus propiedades físicas y químicas, este suelo se clasifica como un Endostagnic Acrisol -de hidráulica interna reducida (Anexo 1.2.2). El contenido de materia orgánica entre 5,93 % en el horizonte Ap y 2,70 % en el horizonte B, hasta una profundidad de 64 cm, mejora considerablemente la capacidad de campo utilizable del perfil, llegando a un total de 170,5 mm (Tabla 20). Como muestran las Tablas 21 y 22, los dos perfiles se caracterizan por una textura con dominancia de arcilla que varía entre 48 y 66 % en el perfil 1, y entre 38 y 82 % en el perfil 2.No obstante, las fracciones de arena y limo también son importantes, ya que tienden a una textura franco arcillosa, principalmente en el perfil 2. Se observa que el contenido de arcilla aumenta con la profundidad del suelo a partir de los horizontes B, un criterio de diagnóstico clave para la determinación del tipo de suelo. En este caso, se trata de un horizonte árgico, de acuerdo con la base de referencia mundial para los suelos (IUSS Working Group WRB, 2022).Ambos suelos son fuertemente ácidos, presentando un pH que varía en un rango de pH 5,1 a pH 5,5, lo que tiene implicaciones importantes para la selección de cultivos y el manejo agrícola (p.ej., encalado). Comparando ambos perfiles, se nota que el pH del perfil 1 es ligeramente más bajo que el del perfil 2. En este rango de acidez (5,0-5,5), los suelos tienden a presentar una toxicidad moderada de aluminio (Al) y posiblemente manganeso (Mn), aunada a una deficiencia de fosforo (P), azufre (S), molibdeno (Mo) y bases (Ca, Mg, K). Las plantas pueden experimentar una variedad de síntomas relacionados con las diferentes deficiencias; por ejemplo, el Mn es un nutriente esencial para las plantas, pero en cantidades excesivas puede generar toxicidad y provocar la aparición de hojas rugosas o ventosas como uno de sus síntomas.La determinación de los requerimientos de cal depende de un muestreo de suelo. La cal se mueve muy poco, por lo cual los efectos benéficos ocurren solamente en la zona de aplicación. Para asegurar una acción efectiva, es necesario incorporar la cal en los primeros 15-20 cm de la superficie, para mezclar el material con la capa del suelo donde se concentran las raíces (ver https://bit.ly/4gzlAXQ). Con respecto al contenido de carbono orgánico, materia orgánica y nitrógeno, se nota una diferencia considerable entre el perfil 1 y el 2. Mientras el perfil 1 se caracteriza por un nivel medio de CO y MO en el horizonte Ap (0-20 cm), el perfil 2 muestra un nivel alto en los horizontes Ap y AB, al igual que un nivel medio en el horizonte B, hasta una profundidad de 64 cm (Tablas 21 y 22).Una característica esencial de los suelos es la capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC) y la saturación de bases de Ca, Mg, K y Na, a partir de la cual es posible inferir la magnitud de la reserva de nutrientes y el grado de intemperismo del suelo; además, el porcentaje de saturación de bases es un dato ampliamente usado en los estudios de fertilidad. La CIC, por su parte, está estrechamente relacionada con el tipo y la cantidad de arcilla y materia orgánica (Anexo 5).Como se observa en las Tablas 23 y 27, la capacidad de intercambio catiónico muestra en la mayoría de los horizontes un nivel medio-alto muy favorable, entre 35 y 45 Cmol c kg -1 , con excepción de los horizontes A que muestran un nivel medio. Esto se relaciona con la textura arcillosa e indicando que las arcillas son principalmente de tipo illita. Teniendo en consideración las particularidades del Valle de Sula, la zona es propia para el desarrollo de cultivos meramente tropicales y que, por generaciones, se han manejado de forma extensiva, intensiva, tecnificada y semi-tecnificada por compañías transnacionales, nacionales, cooperativas agrícolas y productores independientes.Entre los cultivos de mayor importancia, se destacan el banano, el plátano, la palma africana, la caña de azúcar, la piña, el rambután, entre otros. También granos básicos como el maíz, el arroz, la yuca y la malanga.Según el sistema Köppen, el clima en el municipio de San Manuel, Cortés, es tipo Aw: cálido todo el año, con una estación seca. La precipitación media anual es alrededor de 1.178 mm. Los meses de menor precipitación son marzo y abril. La temporada de lluvias comienza en mayo y se intensifica de junio a diciembre, con precipitaciones que varían entre 143 mm en junio y 101 mm en diciembre. No se presenta una canícula durante los meses de julio y agosto.El mes más lluvioso es septiembre, con un promedio de 145 mm (estación meteorológica El Modelo de SERNA, coordenadas: 15.39628354 -87.991673302).La temperatura promedio anual es de 26,4 °C, con una variación estrecha entre 24,1 °C en enero, y 28,6 °C en mayo. La temperatura máxima media en el mes de mayo alcanza los 34,9 °C. La máxima media anual es de 32,2 °C, y la mínima media anual de 22 °C. En ningún mes se registra una temperatura por debajo de 20 °C (Tabla 25). Ambos perfiles muestran buenas propiedades físicas. Una alta profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento, en combinación con una textura favorable, proporciona una alta capacidad de almacenamiento de agua aprovechable para los cultivos, aumentando su resiliencia durante periodos de sequía. Además, en ningún horizonte de los perfiles, hasta la profundidad analizada de 120 cm, se observan moteados o concreciones de hierro o manganeso, lo que indica una buena aireación de los suelos. Esto, independientemente de su cercanía a la orilla del río Ulúa y la posible influencia del nivel freático. Aunque la textura de los suelos indica una alta susceptibilidad a la erosión, por su ubicación en terreno casi a nivel este riesgo prácticamente no existe.Por otro lado, las características químicas presentan algunas condiciones desfavorables que tienen implicaciones importantes con respecto al manejo de los suelos y cultivos. Debido a una reacción entre \"alcalina\" y \"muy alcalina\" de los suelos con valores de 7,8 a 8,2 de pH, se infiere que la disponibilidad de micronutrientes como Fe, Cu, Mn, Co y Zn es reducida. En relación a macroelementos como el calcio (Ca), el magnesio (Mg) y el potasio (K), los cationes intercambiables muestran niveles medio-altos y altos. No obstante, por la dominancia del calcio, la relación catiónica entre calcio y magnesio indica una posible deficiencia de magnesio.Debido a los bajos niveles de materia orgánica y nitrógeno, es importante un enfoque orientado al aumento de la materia orgánica en los suelos a través de prácticas de manejo, incluyendo la introducción de leguminosas en la rotación de cultivos, y como cultivo de cobertura o abono verde. Omonita, perfil 1Con respecto a las características físicas del perfil 1 (Foto 13), destaca una textura que está dominada por la fracción de limo y que varía entre franco arcillosa en los horizontes Ap1 (0-9 cm) y Ap2 (9-27 cm), y franco limosa en los horizontes subyacentes hasta una profundidad de 120 cm (Tabla 4). El horizonte Ap1 se caracteriza por una estructura migajosa de formación biológica (worm casts) y por una muy baja resistencia a la penetración, lo que se refleja además en una densidad aparente (DA) reducida de 1,06 (Tabla 27). El Ap2 muestra una estructura subangular blocosa con agregados friables entre 5 y 8 cm. A la vez, aumenta ligeramente la densidad aparente (1,15) y la resistencia a la penetración a un valor medio. En ambos horizontes se presenta una intensidad mediana de raíces (W3, 6 a 10 raíces/dm 2 ). Esta densidad pasa a ser débil (W2) en los horizontes subyacentes, C1 y C2, y a ser muy débil en el horizonte C3. No obstante, los tres horizontes se caracterizan por una estructura favorable de migas. A una profundidad de 97 cm, en el horizonte C4, no se observan raíces, y su estructura se determina como subangular blocosa media abierta con agregados entre 2 y 8 cm de tamaño (Anexo 1.3.1). El perfil Omonita 1, según WRB, se clasifica como un Eutric Fluvisol.Los valores de la densidad aparente entre 1,06 y 1,22 determinan un alto volumen total de poros, de 54,0 a 60,0 % (Tabla 27). Además, la textura también determina una muy alta capacidad de almacenamiento de agua aprovechable: 259 mm para los cultivos hasta una profundidad de 120 cm (Tabla 28). El perfil se caracteriza, en todos sus horizontes, por una alta profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento y la ausencia de moteados o concreciones de manganeso o hierro, lo que indica un buen drenaje interno. Con respecto a las características químicas del perfil, presenta un pH que varía entre alcalino en los horizontes Ap1 y Ap2, y fuertemente alcalino (> pH 8,0) en los horizontes subyacentes. El contenido de materia orgánica es bajo (< 2 %) en todos los horizontes del perfil, también lo es el contenido de nitrógeno. El fósforo disponible, por su parte, se ubica en un nivel adecuado hasta una profundidad de 65 cm en el horizonte C1 (Tabla 29). En los horizontes subyacentes C1 y C2, se aprecia una estructura angular blocosa, con agregados de un tamaño entre 1 y 7 cm, y una abundancia de poros muy finos/común (ver capítulo 4, descripción de perfiles). A partir del horizonte C2, y a mayor profundidad, la intensidad de raíces sigue disminuyendo hasta muy débil (W1, 1 a 2 raíces/dm 2 ).El color de los horizontes se ubica de manera homogénea a lo largo del perfil, en el rango 10YR de la tabla Munsell. Allí se muestra que los horizontes Ap1 y Ap2, en estado húmedo, adoptan un color marrón amarillento oscuro (10 YR 3/4), y en estado seco un marrón grisáceo (10 YR 5/2). En los horizontes subyacentes, el color cambia ligeramente a marrón (10 YR 4/3) y marrón oscuro (10 YR 3/3) en condición húmeda, mientras en condición seca se torna gris marrón claro (10 YR 6/2) y marrón (10 YR 5/3) (Anexo 1.3.2).Foto 14. Omonita, perfil de suelo 2Los bajos valores de la densidad aparente determinan un muy alto volumen total de poros: entre 62,3 y 63,8 % en los horizontes Ap1 y Ap2. Por otra parte, con el aumento de la densidad aparente en los horizontes subyacentes (DA: entre 1,24 y 1,31), el volumen total de poros se reduce a valores entre 50,6 % en el horizonte C3 y 53,2 % en el horizonte C1 (Tabla 31). No obstante, debido a la textura, el volumen de agua aprovechable y que podría ser almacenada para el cultivo se calcula en 233 mm, hasta una profundidad de 120 cm (Tabla 32). Por lo tanto, el perfil se caracteriza por una alta profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento. La ausencia de moteados o concreciones de manganeso o hierro en todos los horizontes indica una aireación y drenaje interno adecuados. Los suelos desarrollados en los materiales finos no presentan residuos clásticos en sus horizontes (perfil 1 y 3). Se caracterizan por una textura que oscila entre franco limosa, limosa y franco arcillosa. Este rango de texturas proporciona, por su porcentaje de poros medianos, una favorable capacidad de retención de agua aprovechable para las plantas.Los suelos presentan un buen drenaje interno. En ningún horizonte se han observado moteados o nódulos de diferente color o tamaño, lo que indica que no dominan procesos de oxidación/reducción y problemas de drenaje interno.Los suelos proporcionan un potencial fisiológico de enraizamiento de mediano a alto, hasta 90 cm (perfil 3), si no se presentan horizontes compactados. La intensidad de raíces en la mayoría de los horizontes A y B es débil o muy débil, salvo en el perfil 1, donde el horizonte A (0-8 cm) presenta una intensidad mediana de raíces. En general, se puede constatar que la intensidad de las raíces es deficiente. Esto se correlaciona con la ausencia de macrofauna biológica activa en todos los perfiles (p. ej. lombrices, cochinillas). Solo en el primer horizonte de los perfiles 1 y 2, se percibe un olor notable a tierra, indicador de la actividad microbiana.La diferenciación de los perfiles en el material parental de los depósitos aluviales y parcialmente coluviales se expresa en los cambios de color debido a la formación de minerales de arcilla como Goethita, así como signos de iluviación de arcilla en horizontes inferiores, lo que indica una ligera o moderada intemperización, por lo cual los suelos se clasificarán como Cambisoles y Luvisoles de acuerdo con la Base de Suelos de Referencia de la FAO (IUSS, 2022). Algunas características (slickensides, contenido de arcilla, grietas) del perfil 3 indican a un Vertic Cambisol.El perfil Las Acacias 1 (Foto 16) muestra una textura franco arcillosa con dominancia en la fracción de arena, hasta una profundidad de 72 cm. En el horizonte C (72-100 cm) subyacente, se observa un aumento significativo en la fracción de arcilla, otorgándole una textura arcillosa. El horizonte Ah1 (0-8 cm) se caracteriza por una estructura de migas con un olor fuerte a tierra, mostrando una densidad aparente (DA) de 1,12; además, evidencia una intensidad mediana de raíces W3, no presenta moteados o concreciones, y en estado húmedo adopta un color gris muy oscuro (2.5 Y 3/1). El horizonte subyacente Ah2 (8-20cm) es de una estructura subangular blocosa, en estado húmedo se torna color negro (2.5 Y 2.5/1), y la intensidad de sus raíces se reduce a débil W2 (3-5 raíces/dm 2 ); además, no se percibe ningún olor de este horizonte (inodoro) (Anexo 1.4.1).Foto 16. Las Acacias, perfil de suelo 1La densidad aparente (DA) aumenta considerablemente a valores de 1,48 en el horizonte Bw1, y a 1,67 en el Bw2 (Tabla 41), lo que coincide con una estructura laminar compactada, indicando, además, un piso de arado en el horizonte Bw1 (20-34 cm). El horizonte C muestra una estructura prismática y la densidad aparente se reduce a 1,24. Las características principales de los horizontes, como la formación de estructura, el rango de textura y de color, así como una saturación de bases mayor a 50 %, permiten clasificar este perfil como un Eutric Cambisol. Las clases texturales de los diferentes horizontes del perfil, junto con una distribución equilibrada entre arena, limo y arcilla (textura franca) y un contenido medio de materia orgánica en los horizontes Ah, permiten determinar una capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu) de 153 mm, hasta una profundidad de 1 m del perfil, es decir, un rango medio-alto (Tabla 37). El perfil Las Acacias 2 muestra una textura entre franco y franco arcillosa en los diferentes horizontes, y arcillosa en el horizonte Bt (25-47 cm). En el horizonte C1 (47-86 cm), se observa un incremento considerable de arena a 56 %, lo que indica un cambio de material de origen. El horizonte Ap (0-25 cm) se caracteriza por una estructura masiva subangular blocosa con poros visibles muy pocos/finos. Además, muestra un color gris muy oscuro con un olor fuerte a tierra, pero una intensidad de raíces muy débil. La densidad aparente de 1,06 es baja (Tabla 40). El aumento de arcilla en el horizonte Bt (25-47 cm) se expresa en una estructura angular blocosa por separación abiótica, con una reducida abundancia de poros muy pocos/finos. La densidad aparente alcanza un valor de 1,3 y la densidad de raíces sigue siendo muy débil (W1). El suelo del horizonte Bt muestra un color gris muy oscuro (2.5 Y 3/1) y es inodoro (Anexo 1.4.2).Foto 17. Las Acacias, perfil de suelo 2En el horizonte subyacente C1, la densidad aparente sube considerablemente a 1,55, con una estructura angular blocosa y sin la presencia de raíces. El color cambia a un amarrillo oliva (color Munsell 2.5Y 6/6), lo que además del cambio textural también explica que el horizonte corresponde a una discontinuidad litológica. El último horizonte C2 (86-109 cm) muestra una estructura grumosa formada por fragmentación, con una textura franco arcillosa y un color marrón oliva claro (2.5Y 5/3), y su densidad aparente es de 1,56, similar al horizonte anterior. El horizonte Bt presenta los aspectos de un horizonte árgico. En conclusión, las características químicas del perfil y la alta capacidad de intercambio catiónico (Tabla 43) indican que el suelo se clasifica como Haplic Luvisol. Debido a una composición textural favorable, con dominancia de la fracción de limo en el horizonte Ap, una densidad aparente baja, así como un contenido de materia orgánica media, se determina una capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu) de 65 mm del horizonte Ap, en los primeros 25 cm del perfil. La CCu se reduce paulatinamente en los horizontes subyacentes, hasta 14 % en el C2. No obstante, en total el perfil llega a almacenar 180,5 mm de agua aprovechable para los cultivos (Tabla 41). En relación a las características químicas del perfil, se presenta un pH alcalino a lo largo de todo el perfil del suelo, en un rango de 7,74 en el horizonte C1 y 8,02 en el horizonte C2 del subsuelo. La materia orgánica se reduce en el horizonte Bt a 0,96 % y, a partir de los 47 cm, disminuye 0,25 % (Tabla 42). La capacidad de intercambio catiónico oscila entre un nivel medio y medio-alto, con valores de 30,2 Cmol c /kg en el horizonte Ah y de 45,4 Cmol c /kg en el Bc (Tabla 54). La suma de las bases intercambiables totales muestra un nivel muy alto (≥ 15 Cmol c /kg). El calcio presenta valores entre altos y muy altos, el magnesio se encuentra en un nivel muy alto, y el potasio muestra valores altos y muy altos en todo el perfil. Considerando las relaciones catiónicas, se evidencia una deficiencia de potasio debido a la relación Ca/K, con valores mayores a 30, y a la relación (Ca + Mg)/K, con valores mayores a 40 (Tabla 47). La estación se ubica en la unidad geográfica del Valle del Guayape, en el extremo sureste del municipio de Juticalpa, en la aldea de La Concepción, a escasos 500 m de la ribera norte del río Guayape y la parte sur del río Juticalpa. La temperatura oscila entre 18 y 33 °C y presenta una humedad relativa que puede llegar hasta el 90 % en los meses de julio a septiembre. Las condiciones climáticas y de los suelos proporcionan condiciones excelentes para el cultivo de granos básicos como el maíz, frijol, sorgo forrajero y soya, así como cucurbitáceas como sandía, melón, calabaza y frutales del orden de los cítricos.La Tabla 48 y la Imagen 7 muestran las coordenadas y la ubicación del perfil analizado en La Concepción. El perfil La Concepción (Foto 19) muestra una textura que varía entre franco arenosa y arenosa franca y se caracteriza por una alta capacidad de infiltración y permeabilidad interna. Además, la profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento mayor a 80 cm es buena. No obstante, la capacidad de retención y almacenamiento de agua aprovechable para las plantas es baja, lo que tiene implicaciones en el manejo y la frecuencia de riego.Datos tomados del trabajo realizado en convenio DICTA-CIAT por: Dr. Jürgen Baumann Ing. René JacoLa Concepción, Juticalpa, Olancho: franco arenoso Perfil 1. Suelo Dystric Fluvisol (arenic)El perfil muestra una reacción neutra con un pH que varía entre 6,6 y 7,0, un rango óptimo que no afecta la disponibilidad de nutrientes. El contenido de materia orgánica y de nitrógeno se encuentra en un nivel medio solamente en el primer horizonte Ap, mientras el contenido de fósforo es muy alto hasta en el subsuelo. En el perfil se distinguen cuatro horizontes hasta una profundidad de 100 cm. Con respecto a la textura, domina la fracción de arena a lo largo del perfil. Mientras los horizontes Ap, ApC y C1 se caracterizan por una textura franco arenosa, el horizonte C2 muestra una textura arenosa franca (arena: 82 %, ver Tabla 50). El horizonte Ap (0-11 cm) presenta una estructura migajosa de formación biótica. No obstante, en estado seco, se percibe compacto con una resistencia media a la penetración (4 cm), mientras en estado húmedo la resistencia se reduce drásticamente a un nivel muy bajo (13 cm). El siguiente horizonte de transición ApC es muy compacto en estado seco, con una extrema resistencia a la penetración (0,5 cm), la cual se reduce en estado húmedo a un valor medio (5 cm), siendo un ejemplo de la susceptibilidad de los suelos arenosos a la compactación. En estado húmedo se presenta la estructura granular del horizonte ApC.La densidad aparente (DA) aumenta significativamente del horizonte Ap al horizonte ApC1, de 1,35 a 1,60, un valor característico para una textura arenosa. Este nivel se mantiene en el horizonte subyacente C1 (DA 1,59) para aumentar a 1,68 en el horizonte C2. Ambos horizontes muestran una estructura granular; sin embargo, el C2 se distingue del C1 por un contenido de gravilla en aproximadamente 50 % de su volumen. La densidad de raíces presenta un nivel mediano W3 (6 a 10 raíces por dm 2 ) en el Ap para disminuir gradualmente en los horizontes subyacentes: débil en el ApC (W2) y muy débil en el C1 (W1). En el horizonte C2 ya no se observan raíces en la pared del perfil (Anexo 1.5). Los suelos arenosos se caracterizan por su baja capacidad de retención de agua disponible para las plantas. Como se muestra en la Imagen 8, la capacidad de campo utilizable para las plantas solamente es de 9 a 10 % en un suelo con más de 85 % de arena.No obstante, con el incremento de las fracciones de limo y arcilla, el volumen de los poros que retienen agua aprovechable para las plantas aumenta. Derivada de la textura de los diferentes horizontes, entre arena ligera (horizonte C2), mediana (horizonte C1) y fuertemente franca (horizontes Ap y ApC), así como del rango de densidad aparente, la fracción de los poros que retiene agua utilizable para las plantas oscila entre 14 y 21 % en los diferentes horizontes del perfil de La Concepción (Tabla 50).Conocer estas características permite interpretar valores de mediciones de humedad de suelo para la programación de la frecuencia de riego y determinar el volumen de agua a aplicar por cada riego. Por otro lado, los suelos arenosos se caracterizan por una buena capacidad de aireación (poros > 50 μm, pF < 1,8), así como por una alta capacidad de infiltración y permeabilidad (drenaje hidráulico interno).No obstante, a nivel de planta, se observa en el suelo arenoso el enraizamiento profundo del cacahuate hasta aproximadamente 100 cm de profundidad (Foto 20). Esto refleja el valor de integrar especies, como diferentes leguminosas que se caracterizan por un enraizamiento fuerte y profundo para integrar en sistemas de roturación de cultivos.El volumen total de poros (porosidad) de los diferentes horizontes del perfil se presenta en la Tabla 49. Los valores entre 36,6 % del horizonte C2 -más arenoso -y 40 % de los horizontes C1 y ApC son característicos de suelos arenosos y de arenosos ligeramente francos. La porosidad total del horizonte Ap, 49 %, refleja un mayor contenido de materia orgánica.Foto 20. Enraizamiento profundo del cacahuate, perfil de suelo La Concepción Imagen 8. Curvas pF de suelos arenosos, limosos y arcillosos La capacidad de almacenamiento y retención de agua para las plantas es un parámetro importante para definir la calidad de un suelo, así como para establecer la frecuencia y los volúmenes de riego. La Tabla 50 muestra los valores de la capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu), dependiendo de la textura del suelo, la densidad aparente (DA) y la materia orgánica. Con 128,6 mm, el perfil tiene una capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu) media en la zona efectiva de enraizamiento -hasta 100 cm de profundidad -, equivalente a 128,6 litros que pueden ser almacenadas como agua aprovechable para las plantas en 1 m 3 del suelo. El perfil muestra una reacción neutra a lo largo de todos los horizontes, con valores de pH que varían entre 6,6 en el horizonte Ap y 7,0 en el horizonte C2. Debido al clima cálido, el contenido de materia orgánica es de 3,34 % -nivel medio -en el horizonte Ap, mientras los horizontes subyacentes muestran valores bajos. De manera homóloga se encuentra el contenido de nitrógeno (Tabla 51). Lo que llama la atención son los valores muy altos de fósforo hasta en el subsuelo. De acuerdo con el método de análisis (Mehlich 3), los valores mayores a 30 mg/kg de fósforo disponible son altos, y los valores muy elevados en los primeros dos horizontes indican una aplicación frecuente de fertilizantes de fósforo. Rosas et.al. (1996) reportaron que los niveles de fósforo en suelos utilizados para la producción de frijol en el departamento de Olancho son más altos que en los departamentos de Francisco Morazán y El Paraíso, al presentar valores hasta de 345 mg/kg de P soluble (Mehlich-1). Recientemente, Escobar Roca (2022) realizó una investigación sobre la fijación de fósforo y potasio, evaluando su aplicación en distintas dosis en suelos de Honduras con diferentes niveles de fósforo. 2018), para la mayoría de los cultivos el nivel óptimo de contenido de fósforo (Mehlich-3) se encuentra entre 36 y 50 mg/kg, y por encima del óptimo se puede esperar un 100 % de rendimiento potencial sin fertilización. Con respecto al cultivo de café en Guatemala, Martínez (2022) destaca que a un nivel de fósforo de 75 mg/kg (Mehlich-3), la correlación entre concentración de fósforo en el suelo y la producción relativa llega a 90 %.Comparando estos valores con los niveles de fósforo del perfil, una aplicación de fósforo en la parcela analizada no tendrá un efecto en el rendimiento del cultivo.Aunque la capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC) es baja, debido a los altos niveles de saturación, la suma de las bases intercambiables se ubica en un nivel medio en los primeros dos horizontes, y en un nivel bajo en el subsuelo. En cuanto a los macronutrientes, el magnesio (Mg) presenta niveles altos, el potasio (K) medio-altos, y medios para el calcio (Ca) (Tabla 52).Además, las relaciones catiónicas muestran valores que no limitan la disponibilidad de algún nutriente. La relación Ca/Mg se puede considerar buena (entre 2 y 5) y la relación Mg/K aceptable. También la relación Ca/K se encuentra en un rango aceptable que no genera una deficiencia de potasio. Lo mismo indica la relación Ca+Mg/K.Tanto los niveles de las bases como las relaciones entre sí indican que el suministro de estos nutrientes no causará deficiencias en el desarrollo de los cultivos. Estación La Lujosa, CholutecaLa estación La Lujosa está ubicada en el municipio de Marcovia, y corresponde a la unidad geomorfológica \"Planicie aluvial río Choluteca\", que se caracteriza por terrazas aluviales, planicies aluviales activas (vegas) y costas activas, con una composición litológica de rocas, guijarros, grava, arena y lodo no consolidados pertenecientes a la era Cenozoica y al Cuaternario reciente (Arévalo de Gauggel et al., 2005).En las planicies aluviales, a menudo se asocian suelos tipo Fluvisol, Arenosol, Cambisol y Gleysol. Las texturas pueden variar desde arenosas y franco arenosas hasta franco arcillosas y arcillosas, de acuerdo con el material depositado, su origen, distancia del río y los cursos de agua. Por esto, se encuentran suelos tanto bien como mal drenados.Las inundaciones y desbordamientos del río Choluteca en la zona sur, incluyendo el área del municipio de Marcovia, han aportado y depositado grandes cantidades de sedimentos de material erosionado, que forma el sustrato para el desarrollo de los suelos aluviales. El evento más marcado en la historia reciente fue el huracán Mitch en el año 1998. No obstante, han ocurrido otros eventos importantes posteriormente, como las fuertes lluvias del 6 de octubre de 2018.De acuerdo con la clasificación de Köppen, es un clima tropical caliente subhúmedo con lluvias en verano (Aw). Como muestran los datos hidro-climatológicos en el \"Sistema de apoyo a la planificación hídrica local\" de la plataforma Agua de Honduras (https://aguadehonduras.gob.hn/) para la microcuenca 1901017, en la cual se ubica La Lujosa, la precipitación media anual es alrededor de 2.077 mm de lluvia (Tabla 53). En el mes de abril se presentan las primeras lluvias que advierten el establecimiento de la temporada de lluvias a partir del mes de mayo, con un promedio mensual alto de 338 mm. Los meses de mayor lluvia son septiembre y octubre, mientras en julio y agosto se presenta la canícula, con promedios mensuales inferiores -entre 189,3 y 288,7 mm.La temperatura promedio máxima anual es de 30,4 °C, con una variación mensual entre 29,1 °C en noviembre y 32,6 °C en abril, siendo este último el mes más caluroso. El promedio anual sigue el mismo patrón, con una variación mensual entre 25,7 °C en noviembre y 28,7 °C en abril. La evapotranspiración potencial (ET pot ) supera a la lluvia en el periodo de noviembre a abril. Los cuatro perfiles analizados se caracterizan por una textura favorable que varía, con excepción del perfil 1, entre franco arenosa, franco limosa y arcillosa limo arenosa. La fracción de arcilla no es dominante en ninguno de los perfiles, lo que favorece el drenaje interno de los suelos. Esto tiene especial importancia debido a la influencia del agua subterránea y del nivel freático somero. No obstante, la presencia de moteados de hierro y manganeso indica que, temporalmente, existen condiciones reductoras por saturación de agua. Las condiciones reductoras se expresan más en el perfil tres, y menos en los perfiles dos y cuatro, mientras en el perfil uno no se observan debido a su textura más gruesa. La intensidad de raíces en los primeros dos horizontes de los perfiles, hasta profundidades entre 13 (perfil 1) y máximo 39 cm (perfil 4), es mediana; y en los horizontes subyacentes varía entre débil y muy débil.El desarrollo radicular a partir de 30-40 cm puede ser limitado por el nivel freático que temporalmente se puede considerar muy somero, aunque los cuatro perfiles muestran una alta profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento hasta 100 cm. Siendo el perfil 1 (Foto 21) el más cercano al cauce del río Choluteca, muestra una textura gruesa entre arena muy fina y fina, con una estructura coherente hasta 100 cm de profundidad. No obstante, en el subsuelo mayor a 100 cm se nota un cambio brusco de textura a franco limosa y una estructura subpoliédrica fina. La densidad aparente es baja hasta una profundidad de 13 cm, y la resistencia a la penetración muestra horizontes blandos, que permiten fácilmente la inserción del cuchillo.La intensidad de raíces oscila entre mediana (W3) en los horizontes superiores, y muy débil (W1) a partir de los 100 cm, lo que indica una alta profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento. Hasta una profundidad de 100 cm no se observan moteados ni concreciones; sin embargo, a partir de esa profundidad, la influencia del agua y el cambio periódico entre condiciones de reducción y oxidación se manifiestan con la aparición de algunos moteados y manchas (Anexo 1.6.1).Foto 21. La Lujosa, perfil de suelo 1Al momento de la descripción del perfil, se observó que la humedad subió por ascenso capilar hasta los 45 cm inferiores a la superficie del suelo. Debido a que la textura a lo largo del perfil hasta 100 cm es más gruesa que franco arenosa y el material del sustrato son depósitos aluviales, se clasificará este perfil de suelo como un Fluvic Arenosol. Por la textura arenosa con un contenido de arena entre 74 y 92 % en los primeros cuatro horizontes, y el bajo contenido de materia orgánica en los horizontes Ap y ApC, el perfil presenta una baja capacidad de retención de agua que reduce la fracción del agua de la capacidad de campo que es aprovechable por el cultivo a solo 108,6 mm hasta una profundidad de 100 cm (Tabla 56). No obstante, la zona efectiva de enraizamiento es más profunda, y el cambio de textura aumenta la capacidad de retención de agua en el horizonte C3 mayor a 1 m de profundidad. Además, el ascenso capilar del agua desde el manto freático somero es un aspecto positivo para el suministro de agua para los cultivos. El perfil 1 se caracteriza por una reacción neutra a lo largo de todos los horizontes, con valores de pH que varían entre 6,8 en el horizonte C3 y 7,3 en el horizonte C2. El contenido de materia orgánica, con menos de 2 %, se encuentra en un nivel bajo, mientras el contenido de fósforo muestra niveles altos en los primeros tres horizontes y un nivel adecuado en el horizonte C2. Debido a la textura arenosa y las condiciones climáticas con una precipitación media anual de 2.077 mm, el fósforo es susceptible a una migración al subsuelo (Tabla 57). La textura del perfil 2, con una composición más equilibrada entre las fracciones de arena, limo y arcilla, proporciona una mayor capacidad de retención de agua aprovechable que la del perfil 1. La capacidad de campo utilizable asciende a 189,9 mm hasta 1 metro de profundidad. El pH en el perfil 2 presenta una reacción ácida en los primeros 2 cm del horizonte Ah, lo que coincide con el alto contenido de materia orgánica (Tabla 61), y una reacción ligeramente ácida con pH 6,23 en el horizonte AhC hasta una profundidad de 18 cm. Los demás horizontes subyacentes se caracterizan por un pH neutro, en un rango estrecho entre 7,09 y 7,34. Con respecto al contenido de fósforo, se evidencia un nivel entre adecuado y alto en los primeros 18 cm del perfil, y niveles bajos en los horizontes subyacentes. La densidad mediana de enraizamiento (W3) en el horizonte C (55 -> 100 cm) coincide con la baja resistencia a la penetración. Sin embargo, los moteados y concreciones indican que el drenaje interno a partir de 35 cm está reducido temporalmente, causando una deficiencia de oxigenación. El suelo se clasifica como un Fluvic Cambisol (Clayic). El perfil 3 presenta una textura franco limosa y franca en los primeros dos horizontes hasta una profundidad de 33 cm, lo que determina una CCu favorable, entre 18 y 22 %. El incremento en la fracción de arcilla en los horizontes subyacentes reduce a 15 % la fracción de agua de la capacidad de campo que es aprovechable por el cultivo en el horizonte Bw. Además, por el contenido de grava y gravilla, la CCu en el horizonte C se limita considerablemente, por lo que la capacidad de campo aprovechable total para el cultivo hasta una profundidad de 100 cm se calcula en 140,1 mm en el perfil 3 (Tabla 64).El perfil 3 se compone hasta una profundidad de 100 cm por cuatro horizontes. Una de las características del perfil es que en todos los horizontes se observan moteados: mientras en los primeros dos horizontes los moteados son pocos y de tamaño fino, en los horizontes subyacentes son abundantes, mayores a 40 % y de tamaño medio. Además de los moteados, en el horizonte tres aparecen concreciones y nódulos de manganeso. La textura en los dos horizontes superiores, hasta 33 cm de profundidad, varía entre franco y franco limosa con una estructura subangular blocosa; mientras los horizontes subyacentes muestran una textura arcillosa con una estructura angular blocosa. Es el único perfil con una densidad fuerte de raíces (W4) en el horizonte Ap, la cual se reduce en los horizontes subyacentes a mediano (W3, ApB), débil (W2, B) y mediano (W3, C) (Anexo 1.6.3).Foto 23. La Lujosa, perfil de suelo 3 El rango del pH en el perfil 3 varía en los diferentes horizontes entre ligeramente ácido y neutro, lo que indica condiciones adecuadas para la disponibilidad de nutrientes. El contenido de materia orgánica es bajo, pero varía hasta los 55 cm de profundidad en un rango estrecho entre 1,25 y 1,65 %. El nivel de fósforo en el horizonte Ap es de 15 mg/kg, es decir que se encuentra en un límite entre bajo y adecuado, mientras en los horizontes subyacentes su nivel es muy bajo. Este es el único perfil analizado en la estación La Lujosa donde el contenido de fósforo se considera deficiente. La capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC) muestra un nivel medio en los primeros dos horizontes hasta una profundidad de 33 cm, mientras con el aumento de arcilla en el horizonte B, la CIC sube a un nivel muy alto. La suma de las bases intercambiables varía entre un nivel medio en el horizonte ApB (9,69 Cmol c kg -1 ), alto en el horizonte Bw (12,86 Cmol c kg -1 ), y muy alto en el horizonte Ap (12,86 Cmol c kg -1 ). Las relaciones entre los cationes no indican ninguna deficiencia de alguno de estos elementos, lo que favorece la disponibilidad de estos para los cultivos. El perfil 4 difiere de los demás por una marcada separación en dos zonas de sedimentación que se distinguen visualmente por su color. Cada zona está compuesta por dos horizontes; mientras la primera zona se caracteriza por una textura franco limosa, la zona oscura subyacente presenta una textura franca y franco arenosa con un aumento marcado en la fracción de arena a 60 % (Tablas 68 y 69). Además, hay una diferencia notable en la estructura angular blocosa (horizonte 2) y grumosa (horizonte 3). Se observa una intensidad mediana de enraizamiento hasta 39 cm, la cual se reduce a débil y muy débil en los horizontes subyacentes. La resistencia a la penetración es baja (suave/blanda) a lo largo de todo el perfil, con una densidad aparente homogénea entre 1,21 y 1,24 (Anexo 1.6.4 y Tabla 67).Foto 24. La Lujosa, perfil de suelo 4Se notan muy pocos y muy finos moteados de color rojizo y negro a lo largo del perfil, lo que indica la influencia del agua. No obstante, el drenaje interno se considera bueno. El perfil se caracteriza por una alta profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento y una textura que proporciona una alta capacidad de retención y almacenamiento de agua aprovechable para las plantas. El suelo se clasifica como un Eutric Fluvisol. La textura favorable del perfil, con la dominancia de limo en la composición de las fracciones texturales, determina una alta capacidad de campo utilizable para los cultivos. El suelo puede almacenar en los primeros 100 cm del perfil un total de 204 mm de agua aprovechable (Tabla 68). La acidez en el perfil 4 varía en los diferentes horizontes, siendo ligeramente ácida en el horizonte Ah (pH 6,14) y neutra en los horizontes IC1 y IIC2, lo que indica condiciones adecuadas para la disponibilidad de nutrientes para los cultivos. En el horizonte IIIC3, el pH de 7,49 se ubica en el límite entre neutro y alcalino. El contenido de materia orgánica es alto en el horizonte Ah, con un 3,78 %, pero disminuye a niveles bajos en los horizontes subyacentes, alcanzando entre 1,52 y 1,45 % en el horizonte IIC2. El fósforo en el horizonte Ah es alto, con 49 mg/kg, mientras que los horizontes subyacentes muestran niveles bajos a medianos. El Valle de Comayagua es uno de los valles del interior de la zona de los altiplanos centrales. Se ubica en la parte alta del río Humuya y presenta una forma rectangular alargada con sentido norte-sur. El ancho de este a oeste es de 10-15 km, y de norte a sur de 34-40 km. La elevación de la parte plana del valle es de 600-700 m s. n. m., presentando un suave gradiente en dirección al centro del valle. La zona montañosa de los alrededores marca una altura máxima de 2.000 m s. n. m., formando pendientes abruptos (JICA, 1990). Por su estructura geológica, el Valle de Comayagua constituye la zona más antigua de Honduras y formó parte del bloque continental nuclear centroamericano (JICA, 1990).Con respecto a las características geomorfológicas, los sedimentos lacustres diluviales y los sedimentos de abanicos aluviales son los principales estratos que componen la geología del Valle de Comayagua. Los sedimentos lacustres diluviales dominan en la parte llana de la mitad meridional del valle y se componen de limos y sedimentos arcillosos de color blanco-gris. En cambio, los sedimentos de abanicos aluviales contienen gran cantidad de grava transportada desde las zonas montañosas del este y oeste y se distribuyen cubriendo los sedimentos lacustres de la parte plana del norte del valle, cuyo espesor llega a 20-30 m (JICA, 1990).Los sedimentos lacustres de los límites del valle y de las llanuras de inundación, aunque contienen cierta cantidad de gravas, son formados en general por depósitos arcillo limosos y se distribuyen a lo largo de los lechos de los principales ríos.Por las características particulares de los suelos antiguos de origen lacustre y arcillosos de los valles centrales de Honduras, y particularmente del Valle de Comayagua, por generaciones se ha desarrollado una agricultura tradicional de granos básicos como maíz y frijol, al igual que el cultivo de arroz bajo sistema de inundación de parcelas. Además, se ha promovido la agricultura tecnificada de nuevos cultivos, tales como berenjena, pepino chino, ocra y camote, al igual que frutales como la guayaba, el mango, el limón, entre otros.De acuerdo con la clasificación de Köppen, el Valle de Comayagua presenta un clima tropical caliente subhúmedo con lluvias en verano (Aw), el cual se caracteriza por una temperatura media en el mes más frío mayor a 18 °C, una cantidad de lluvia en el mes más seco menor a 60 mm, y la vigésima quinta parte de la precipitación anual media inferior a 100 mm (Precipitación media anual en mm/25).Imagen 11. Delimitación de la microcuenca 509009La Estación Experimental Playitas se ubica dentro de la microcuenca 509009 (Agua de Honduras), que forma parte de la subcuenca Humuya Alta, dentro la cuenca del río Ulúa.La microcuenca abarca un área de 1.315 ha con un perímetro de 21,9 km. La diferencia entre la altitud mínima de 576 m s. n. m. y la altitud máxima de 1.471 m s. n. m. es considerable. Como muestra la Imagen 11, aproximadamente el 40 % de la superficie abarca la zona montañosa, mientras el 60 % está ubicada en el valle.Los datos climatológicos se tomaron de la estación meteorológica Playitas de la Serna (código de estación 25084), la cual está ubicada dentro de la estación experimental de DICTA. Como se muestra en la Tabla 71, la precipitación media anual es alrededor de 836 mm de lluvia, con una variación entre años de 576 mm (mínimo) y 1.177 mm (máximo) para el periodo de 1970 a 2007 (n=39). La temporada de lluvias se extiende durante seis meses, desde mayo hasta finales de octubre. En promedio, los meses de mayor precipitación son junio (161 mm) y septiembre (179 mm), mientras en julio y agosto se presenta la canícula con una reducción de la precipitación. Las precipitaciones máximas mensuales, entre 390 mm y 447 mm, han ocurrido en junio, septiembre y octubre. 835,5 7,7 6,0 10,0 36,1 105,1 161,2 95,3 116,2 178,5 119,5 30,6 13,5 Prec. maxíma 1. 176,8 40,7 30,3 81,6 277,4 213,1 412,5 237,1 263,2 394,5 446,9 90,0 59,3 Prec. mínima 576,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 20,7 48,7 24,3 30,4 86,3 8,0 0,0 0,1 Temp. media 25,2 22,9 24,3 26,1 27,4 27,4 26,1 25,9 26,0 25,5 24,5 23,3 22,9Temp. máxima media 30,9 28,9 30,6 32,7 33,7 33,2 31,7 31,1 31,5 30,9 29,4 28,3 28,5Temp HR relativa máxima 75,6 82,0 76,0 65,0 72,0 72,0 85,0 82,0 79,0 80,0 86,0 84,0 85,0 HR relativa mínima 64,3 61,0 51,0 48,0 47,0 53,0 46,0 59,0 64,0 70,0 60,0 71,0 54,0La temperatura media anual es 25,2 °C, con una variación mensual entre 22,9 °C en diciembre y enero, y 27,4 °C en abril y mayo, siendo estos últimos los meses más calurosos. Las temperaturas medias máximas pueden ser superiores a 30 °C durante todo el periodo de febrero a septiembre, con un promedio anual de 30,9 °C. Las temperaturas máximas absolutas, entre 34 y 37 °C, se han registrado de febrero a junio.La humedad relativa media anual es del 68,5 %, con los valores más bajos en marzo y abril, alcanzando un 57,7 %. Entre junio y diciembre, la humedad relativa media varía entre el 70 y el 76 %, con picos máximos del 79 al 86 % en el mismo periodo.En la Tabla 72 se presentan las coordenadas de las cuatro calicatas y perfiles analizados en la estación Playitas, y la Imagen 10 muestra los perfiles y los lotes correspondientes ubicados dentro de la estación. En los cuatro perfiles, se distinguen visualmente dos zonas que difieren en su color. La zona superior muestra un color entre gris y gris oscuro que cambia gradualmente hacia abajo (zona de transición) a un color rojizo. No obstante, los colores Munsell muestran que el color rojizo se refleja en el fondo del color gris del suelo seco en los horizontes A (5YR 4/2 dark reddish grey, 5YR 4/2 reddish grey). En los horizontes del subsuelo, dominan los colores rojizo marrón oscuro (5YR 3/3), rojizo marrón (5YR 4/4) y rojizo oscuro (5R 3/3).La textura en los horizontes superiores varía entre franco limo arenosa, franco limosa y arcillo arenosa, con la tendencia del incremento de la fracción de arcilla en los horizontes subyacentes. No obstante, en todos los horizontes se detecta una ligera fracción de arena. La textura de los cuatro perfiles se puede considerar buena en relación al rango de poros que determina la retención y el almacenamiento de agua. En la mayoría de los horizontes, la densidad aparente oscila de 1,45 a 1,65 g/cm 3 . Debido a la textura, estos valores se pueden considerar medio-altos e indican problemas de compactación, lo que se refleja en algunos horizontes con signos oxido-reductores temporales. En tres horizontes del subsuelo de los perfiles 1 y 3 se midieron valores muy altos: entre 1,76 y 2,08 g/cm 3 , lo que determina una porosidad total baja y una hidráulica interna reducida. Por otro lado, la hidráulica interna y la oxigenación de los perfiles está influenciada positivamente por la presencia de tubos de lombrices que, en algunos perfiles, alcanzan hasta una profundidad de 80 cm.En tres de los perfiles, se observan propiedades vérticas, a través de grietas en la superficie del suelo de diferente anchura y densidad, las cuales en algunos casos alcanzan una profundidad de 80 cm. Sin embargo, las propiedades vérticas se evidencian más en el perfil 3, en la parte más baja del terreno.Datos tomados del trabajo realizado en convenio DICTA-CIAT por: Dr. Jürgen Baumann Ing. René Jaco Ing. Lenin PinedaPlayitas, perfil 1: franco arcilloso Playitas, perfil 2: franco Playitas, perfil 3: arcilloso Playitas, perfil 4: franco arcilloso En el perfil 1 (Foto 25), se distinguen seis horizontes con un aumento gradual del contenido de arcilla hasta una profundidad de 64 cm. Las fracciones de arena, limo y arcilla se encuentran proporcionalmente distribuidas en todos los horizontes, por lo que la textura se determina a lo largo del perfil como franco arcillosa (Tabla 74).Los horizontes Ahp y Ap2 se caracterizan por una intensidad de raíces de fuerte a mediana hasta 29 cm de profundidad. No obstante, la estructura de ambos horizontes se caracteriza en estado seco como masiva coherente, con una resistencia a la penetración muy alta en el horizonte AP1 (0-8 cm), y menos alta en el Ap2 (8-29 cm). En ambos horizontes se percibe un ligero olor a tierra cuando se humedecen. La abundancia de poros se encuentra entre fino/ común y fino/poco, con la presencia dispersa de algunos tubos de lombrices. La densidad de raíces se reduce gradualmente en los horizontes subyacentes, desapareciendo por completo en el horizonte C a partir de 79 cm (Anexo 1.7.1).Foto 25. Playitas, perfil de suelo 1En el horizonte C, ya no se observan poros y la densidad aparente (DA) alcanza un valor máximo de 1,78 (Tabla 73). La profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento se determina como moderadamente buena (0,6-0,8 m). Debido a las características de transformación del material parental, la formación de estructura en los horizontes B y la ausencia de propiedades vérticas, el perfil 1 clasifica como un Eutric Cambisol (loamic).Los valores de la densidad aparente (DA) de los diferentes horizontes del perfil y el volumen total de poros (porosidad) se presentan en la Tabla 73. La Tabla 74 muestra los valores de la capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu), dependiendo de la textura del suelo, la densidad aparente (DA) y la materia orgánica. Con 137,5 mm, el perfil muestra una capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu) media hasta 100 cm de profundidad. Con respecto al pH del perfil, se observa un incremento con la profundidad: desde neutro en los horizontes Ahp, Ap2 y B1, pasando por una reacción alcalina en el horizonte B2, hasta muy alcalina -pH 8,0 -en los horizontes BC y C. La materia orgánica en el horizonte Ahp presenta un nivel medio con 2,17 %; mientras en los horizontes subyacentes, Ap2 y B2, varía entre 1,59 y 1,17 % respectivamente (Tabla 75). El nivel de fósforo disponible se considera favorable, al presentar un nivel alto en el Ahp y medio en el Ap2. Esto indica que, en los primeros 30 cm del perfil, hay un contenido disponible de fósforo de 140 kg/ha, y de 321 kg/ha de P 2 O 5 (Anexo 6.1).La capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC), con un valor de 18,7 Cmol c kg -1 en el horizonte Ahp, se considera baja, mientras los horizontes subyacentes se encuentran en un nivel medio entre 23,8 y 34,2 Cmol c kg -1 . Esto, además, coincide con el rango de la CIC que se puede esperar para una textura franco arcillosa. Por otra parte, debido a los altos niveles de saturación, la suma de las bases intercambiables presenta un nivel muy alto en todos los horizontes analizados del perfil. Así mismo, los elementos Ca, Mg y K muestran valores muy altos.La relación catiónica entre Ca y Mg, con valores mayores a 5 en todos los horizontes analizados, evidencia una posible deficiencia de magnesio. Además, el suministro de potasio en los horizontes B1 y B2 también puede ser limitado, según la relación entre Ca/K -con valores superiores a 30 -, y la relación Ca+Mg/K -valores mayores a 40 -(Tabla 76). El perfil 2 (Foto 26) está compuesto hasta una profundidad de 110 cm por cinco horizontes. En los primeros dos, hasta una profundidad de 25 cm, se observa una densidad de raíces entre fuerte y mediana, la cual se reduce a mediana y débil hasta una profundidad de 110 cm. Esto indica una profundidad efectiva favorable para el desarrollo del sistema radicular.El horizonte Ahp (0-9 cm) se caracteriza por una estructura grumosa, y el Ap2 (9-25 cm) por una estructura masiva coherente, mientras los horizontes subyacentes cuentan con una estructura subangular blocosa que varían por el tamaño de sus agregados. En estado seco, los horizontes superficiales presentan una alta resistencia a la penetración -\"duros\" -y una densidad aparente entre 1,51 y 1,53, indicando un piso de arado (Anexo 1.7.2 y Tabla 77). Además, se presentan concreciones de manganeso hasta de 1 cm en el Ap2 (9-25 cm), así como abundantes moteados de hierro en el B1 (25-47cm), lo que indica temporalmente condiciones oxido-reductoras debido a una reducida hidráulica interna.Mientras los horizontes superiores muestran una textura franca, en los horizontes subyacentes disminuye la fracción de arena y aumenta la fracción de arcilla, determinando una textura arcillosa (Tablas 78 y 79). A partir del horizonte B2 (47-96 cm) disminuye la resistencia a la penetración y la densidad aparente, haciéndolos más \"blandos\". En relación al tipo de suelo, el perfil se caracteriza como un Vértic Cambisol. La Tabla 78 muestra los valores de la capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu) dependiendo de la textura del suelo, la densidad aparente (DA) y la materia orgánica. El perfil, hasta 100 cm de profundidad, muestra una capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu) media de 133,8 mm. Se observa que el pH del perfil incrementa con la profundidad: desde ligeramente ácido en el primer horizonte, neutro en los horizontes Ap2 y B1, hasta alcalino a partir de 47 cm de profundidad en los horizontes subyacentes. La materia orgánica muestra niveles bajos en todos los horizontes, con un rango entre 1,99 % en el Ahp y 1,30 % en el B2 (Tabla 79). El nivel de fósforo disponible es alto en los primeros dos horizontes, lo que indica la aplicación de fertilizantes fosfatados en los años anteriores. El perfil 2 muestra una capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC) media en los dos primeros horizontes, mientras en el subsuelo los valores son altos, mayores a 45 Cmol c kg -1 . Esto coincide, igual que en el perfil 1, con el aumento brusco del contenido de arcilla. Debido a los altos niveles de saturación, la suma de las bases intercambiables presenta un nivel muy alto en todos los horizontes analizados del perfil (Tabla 80).Con valores mayores a 5 en todos los horizontes, la relación catiónica Ca/Mg evidencia una posible deficiencia de magnesio. Esto, además, se sustenta en la relación Mg/K, cuyos valores se encuentran por debajo de 1 en los horizontes Ahp y Ap2 (Tabla 80). Estos valores sugieren que se debe tener una especial atención en la fertilización de los cultivos con magnesio. Debido a la textura arcillosa y al incremento de la fracción de arcilla en el subsuelo, la capacidad de campo utilizable varía entre 12 y 15 % en los primeros tres horizontes, hasta una profundidad de 63 cm. En el subsuelo, hasta 110 cm, varía solamente entre 7 y 8 %. Además, el ajuste por el contenido de materia orgánica es marginal, con solo 1 % en el horizonte Ap. La capacidad de campo utilizable (CCu), hasta 100 cm de profundidad, se calcula en un valor mediano de 118 mm (Tabla 82). En los primeros dos horizontes, el perfil 3 se caracteriza por una reacción neutra, con valores de pH entre 6,83 y 7,26, así como un pH alcalino de 7,97 en el horizonte B. En los horizontes subyacentes, el pH es muy alcalino, mostrando valores por encima de 8. La materia orgánica se encuentra en un nivel medio en el horizonte Ap, y en niveles bajos en los horizontes subyacentes. En comparación con los perfiles 1 y 2, el nivel de fósforo disponible es bajo, entre 5 y 8 mg/kg en los primeros tres horizontes, hasta una profundidad de 63 cm. La superficie del suelo alrededor del perfil 4 muestra grietas entre 2 y 5 cm de ancho que alcanzan una profundidad hasta de 60 cm. El primer horizonte Ah muestra una estructura grumosa en los primeros 2 cm y luego una estructura masiva coherente dura con una muy alta resistencia a la penetración (los primeros 7 cm se consideraron como un solo horizonte, sin la separación en Ahp1 y Ahp2, debido a que la intensidad de enraizamiento, textura, color, etc. no variaron). Los horizontes subyacentes se caracterizan por una estructura subangular blocosa con agregados de diferentes tamaños, entre 3 y 10 cm. La alta resistencia a la penetración en el horizonte B1 indica un piso de arado; además, tiene la densidad aparente más alta del perfil, con un valor de 1,59 (Tabla 85). Otra característica del B1 es la apariencia de pequeños fragmentos blancos (0,2 a 1,0 cm) en un 10 % del horizonte.Foto 28. Playitas, perfil de suelo 4La intensidad de raíces es mediana y se percibe un fuerte olor a tierra. La densidad de raíces se reduce a débil en el horizonte Ap2 y a muy débil en los B1 y B2. A partir de 69 cm, en el horizonte BC, ya no se observan raíces y los poros disminuyen a muy poco/fino. La textura franco arcillosa en los primeros tres horizontes cambia a arcilloso en los horizontes subyacentes. En el BC aparecen fragmentos blancos tipo gravilla en un 40 % del horizonte. La profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento se encuentra entre moderada y moderadamente buena. Se observan tubos de lombrices hasta una profundidad de 70 cm (Anexo 1.7.4). El suelo se clasifica como un Vertic Cambisol. El perfil 4 muestra una reacción neutra en los primeros cuatro horizontes, hasta una profundidad de 69 cm, mientras el horizonte BC se caracteriza por una reacción muy alcalina de pH 8,26. La materia orgánica presenta un nivel medio en los primeros 23 cm del perfil, y niveles bajos en los horizontes subyacentes. El fósforo se encuentra en niveles adecuados, con 25 y 17 mg/kg en los horizontes Ahp y Ap2 respectivamente, determinando un contenido de 72 kg/ha en los primeros 30 cm del suelo. Las bases intercambiables Ca, Mg y K y su suma total presentan valores muy altos, mientras la capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC) se ubica en un rango medio y medio-alto. La relación catiónica Ca/Mg indica una deficiencia de magnesio en todo el perfil, con valores entre 6,9 en el horizonte Ahp y 10,3 en el subsuelo. Las relaciones Ca/K y Ca+Mg/K evidencian condiciones aceptables en los primeros dos horizontes, pero una deficiencia de potasio en los horizontes subyacentes (Tabla 88). (Gamero y Fortín, 2016).El río Grande, que atraviesa el Valle de Sensenti, es uno de los principales afluentes del río Higuito, el cual forma parte del río Ulúa, la segunda cuenca hidrográfica más grande de Honduras. Con respecto a la geología, los depósitos aluviales del río Grande están separados de los del río Higuito por un \"puente\" de rocas volcánicas del Grupo Padre Miguel a lo largo del río Alash. Por lo tanto, los depósitos aluviales son menores, ocupando una extensión de 13,5 km 2 desde San Marcos de Ocotepeque en el sur hasta Santa Cruz en el norte (Instituto Geográfico Nacional, 1995).En el valle se presentan abanicos aluviales formados por depósitos de gravas gruesas, bolones, arena y una mezcla de capas de granos finos y gruesos. Esta clasificación incluye varios compuestos de aluviones formados por la deposición de arena, grava y limo, debido a que las bajas pendientes en el curso de los ríos ocasionan la perdida de energía para continuar transportando el material río abajo. Las gravas son depositadas en las curvas y cambios de dirección de los ríos, mientras que, en las planicies, se forman capas de arena fina y limo por debajo de los depósitos (Instituto Geográfico Nacional, 1995).La información climatológica de precipitación y tempertura se tomó de la plataforma Agua de Honduras, en específico de los datos de la microcuenca No. 513096, en los límites de la cual se ubica la Estación Experimental Ramón Villeda Morales (Imagen 13).Imagen 13. Delimitación de la microcuenca 513096De acuerdo con la clasificación de Köppen, el Valle del Sensenti presenta un clima tropical caliente subhúmedo con lluvias en verano (Aw, sabana). En este clima, la temperatura media en el mes más frío es mayor a 18 °C, y la cantidad de lluvia en el mes más seco es menor a 60 mm; además, la vigésima quinta parte de la precipitación media anual es inferior a 100 mm (precipitación media anual en mm/25). Como se muestra en la Tabla 89, la precipitación media anual es de 1.610,4 mm. El periodo de mayo a octubre es el más húmedo, con promedios mensuales que varían entre 178 mm en octubre y 321,5 mm en septiembre -siendo este último el mes con mayor precipitación. Entre noviembre y abril, los promedios mensuales bajan considerablemente, con precipitaciones entre 9,4 mm en enero y 57,4 mm en abril. Las temperaturas medias mensuales varían poco, entre 19,5 °C en diciembre y enero, y 23,7 °C en abril -siendo este y mayo los meses más calurosos. Los cuatro perfiles analizados en la Estación Experimental Ramón Villeda Morales se pueden separar en dos grupos. Los perfiles 3 y 4 se ubican en la orilla del río Suntulín y están desarrollados en materiales fluviales, mostrando una clara estratificación de las diferentes capas de sedimentación. En ambos perfiles domina la fracción de arena con textura franco arenosa y la apariencia de horizontes pedregosos; esto favorece el drenaje interno de los suelos. Solamente en dos horizontes del perfil 4 se observan muy pocos (1 %) moteados de hierro y manganeso. Los dos perfiles se distinguen entre ellos por su profundidad efectiva de enraizamiento, lo que determina la capacidad de almacenamiento de agua aprovechable para los cultivos.En comparación con los fluvisoles, los perfiles 1 y 2 presentan una textura más fina, entre franca, franco arcillosa y arcillosa. No obstante, entre ambos hay diferencias importantes tanto en sus características físicas como químicas. Mientras en el perfil 1 el contenido de arcilla varía estrechamente entre 22 y 34 %, el perfil 2 presenta en los horizontes del subsuelo un contenido entre 64 y 68 %, lo que tiene implicaciones en la capacidad de almacenamiento de agua aprovechable para los cultivos. Ambos perfiles evidencian problemas en relación a la estructura del suelo. En el perfil 1, por debajo del horizonte Ah (0-5 cm), hay un horizonte con una estructura angular blocosa, con alta resistencia a la penetración y una débil intensidad de raíces. En el perfil 2, se observa un horizonte B (27-61 cm) con estructura angular blocosa muy compacta y resistencia mediaalta a la penetración (en condiciones de humedad residual), lo que indica un piso de arado -señal del uso dado al terreno hace 12 años para cultivar arroz.En ambos perfiles, la materia orgánica se encuentra en un rango medio en los horizontes Ah, y disminuye a menos de 1 % en los horizontes subyacentes. Aunque desde hace 12 años la parcela del perfil 2 está fuera de producción y cubierta con pasto, el contenido de materia orgánica no ha aumentado. Sería importante investigar la dinámica de la materia orgánica bajo diferentes usos y manejos del suelo, así como las condiciones climáticas para poder evaluar el potencial de captación de carbono en diferentes escenarios.En el perfil 1, se distinguen siete horizontes. La textura varía entre franca y franco arcillo arenosa. La fracción de arena aumenta a partir del horizonte Bw2 a 64 %, con excepción del Bw4, cuyo porcentaje de arena es de 36 %. El horizonte BC tiene el mayor contenido de arena, con un 76 % (Tabla 92), y también presenta la densidad aparente más alta, con un valor de 1,51. En los demás horizontes, la densidad aparente varía entre 1,26 y 1,35 (Tabla 91), lo que resulta en valores de porosidad total entre el 49 y 52,5 %, proporcionando entre un 17 y 20 % del volumen de poros para el almacenamiento de agua aprovechable para las plantas. Debido a la textura, se considera que el perfil tiene un buen drenaje interno. A lo largo del perfil se observan manchas finas de óxidos de hierro, pero en ningún horizonte dominan el aspecto visual. Solo en el horizonte Bw1 (18-40 cm) también se detectan moteados de manganeso (Anexo 1.8.1).Mientras el horizonte Ah1 (0-5 cm) presenta una estructura migajosa con una fuerte intensidad de raíces (W4), el Ah2 se caracteriza por una estructura angular blocosa con agregados que, en su mayoría, varían entre 5 y 8 cm, además de una intensidad de raíces débil (W2), con 3-5 raíces por dm 2 . Los poros visibles en los agregados varían entre finocomún y fino-pocos. Todos los horizontes subyacentes tienen una estructura subangular blocosa, con agregados entre 3 y 12 cm. Los poros visibles en los agregados varían entre muy fino-común y fino-común. La densidad de raíces hasta una profundidad de 58 cm es débil. Aumenta a una densidad media (W3) de 6-10 raíces por dm 2 en los horizontes Bw3 y Bw4, y disminuye a una densidad muy débil (W1) en el horizonte BC. La penetración de las raíces hasta 129 cm evidencia una zona efectiva de enraizamiento profunda, favorable para el suministro de agua y de mayor resiliencia frente periodos prolongados de la canícula (Anexo 1.8.1).Foto 29. Ramón Villeda Morales, perfil de suelo 1El color de los horizontes se encuentra en la tabla Munsell 10YR, excepto en los horizontes Bw2 y Bw3 en estado húmedo, que se ubican en la tabla Munsell 7.5YR. En los primeros tres horizontes, el color en estado seco es gris marrón claro (10YR 6/2), mientras que en estado húmedo varía: gris oscuro en el Ah1 y marrón grisáceo muy oscuro (10YR 3/2) en el Ah2. Los siguientes tres horizontes presentan en estado seco un color marrón pálido (10YR 6/3), y en estado húmedo, un color marrón (7.5YR 4/3 y 10YR 6/3). Este último está asociado a estados iniciales e intermedios de alteración del suelo y la formación de óxidos de hierro tipo goetita (FeOOH). En cuanto a las características químicas del perfil, destaca un pH fuertemente ácido que varía en un rango muy estrecho, desde 5,03 en el horizonte Ah1 hasta 5,26 en el horizonte Bw3, lo que representa una limitante para la mayoría de cultivos agrícolas. El contenido de materia orgánica solamente se encuentra en un rango medio en los primeros 5 cm del suelo en el horizonte Ah1. En los horizontes subyacentes, el contenido de materia orgánica es bajo, con valores entre 1,46 % en el Ah2 y 0,27 % en el BC. Los niveles de nitrógeno y fósforo son de bajos a muy bajos, lo que indica deficiencias en el suministro de ambos nutrientes principales (Tabla 93). Considerando las características físicas y químicas del perfil, como la textura, el desarrollo de la estructura de los horizontes, la lixiviación de carbonatos, el pH y la saturación de bases, así como la formación de arcillas y sesquióxidos (rango del color del suelo) como resultado de la meteorización de minerales primarios en sedimentos fluviales, el suelo se clasifica como un Fluvic Cambisol.El perfil 2 (Foto 30) se distingue del perfil 1 considerablemente en sus propiedades físicas y químicas. Muestra una textura más fina que está dominada por la fracción de limo en los horizontes Ah y AB, y en los horizontes subyacentes por la fracción de arcilla. Mientras los primeros dos horizontes presentan un contenido de arcilla entre 24 y 30 %, los horizontes subyacentes de textura arcillosa tienen valores de 68 % en el Bw y de 64 % en el BC (Tabla 96). La densidad aparente se incrementa de 1,33 en el horizonte AB a 1,49 en el horizonte C, por lo que la porosidad total se reduce de 49,8 % (AB) a 43,8 % (C). Por la textura es posible estimar un drenaje interno moderado del perfil. Con excepción del horizonte AB, en el cual se presentan muy pocos moteados de manganeso (0-2 %), en los demás horizontes no se observan signos que indiquen un problema de drenaje interno. Mientras el horizonte Ah (0-5/12 Cm) muestra una estructura migajosa con una intensidad de raíces muy fuerte W5 (21-50 raíces por dm 2 ), el horizonte AB se caracteriza por una estructura subangular blocosa con agregados cerrados que, en su mayoría, varían entre 6/8 y 12 cm. No obstante, este último presenta una alta intensidad de raíces W4 (11-20 raíces por dm 2 ). La intensidad de raíces se reduce paulatinamente con la profundidad del perfil: mediana en el horizonte B (W3)de 6 a 10 raíces por dm 2 -y muy débil en el horizonte BC (W1) -de 1 a 2 raíces por dm 2 . El horizonte B tiene una estructura angular blocosa muy compacta con agregados abiertos, y el BC se caracteriza por una estructura subangular blocosa compacta con agregados abiertos (Anexo 1.8.2).El color de los horizontes se ubica en la tabla 7.5YR, con excepción del suelo húmedo del horizonte Bw que se ubica en la tabla 10YR. En los primeros dos horizontes en estado húmedo el color se caracteriza como marrón (7.5YR 4/3 7.5YR 5/2), y en estado seco como gris rosado (7.5YR 6/2).El horizonte B muestra un color gris oscuro en estado húmedo (7.5YR 4/1) y gris en estado seco (10YR 5/1). En el horizonte BC se nota un cambio de color de fondo, siendo marrón en estado seco (7.5YR 5/2); en cambio, los horizontes superiores en este mismo estado tienen un color gris de fondo. El horizonte BC, estado húmedo, es marrón oscuro (7.5YR 3/2) (Anexo 1.8.2). Con respecto a las características químicas del perfil, se destaca que el pH incrementa con la profundidad a lo largo de los horizontes. Mientras el horizonte Ah muestra una reacción fuertemente ácida de pH 5,43, la acidez disminuye a ligeramente ácida en el horizonte AB, con un pH de 6,22. Los horizontes subyacentes se caracterizan por una reacción neutra, con un pH de 6,93 en el horizonte B y de 6,58 en el horizonte BC (Tabla 97).El contenido de materia orgánica se encuentra en un rango medio solamente en el horizonte Ah. En los horizontes subyacentes, el contenido de materia orgánica es muy bajo, con niveles inferiores a 0,5 %. El mismo patrón se muestra para los contenidos de nitrógeno y fósforo, determinando deficiencias en el suministro de ambos nutrientes principales (Tabla 97). Considerando las características físicas y químicas del perfil y la acumulación de arcilla en los horizontes B, aspecto propio de un horizonte árgico (capa subsuperficial con claramente mayor contenido de arcilla que la capa suprayacente y/o presencia de arcilla iluvial, WRB 2015), así como algunos moteados en el horizonte AB, el perfil se clasifica como un Epistagnic Luvisol. El perfil 3 (Foto 31) se encuentra en la ribera del río Suntulín y está compuesto por diferentes capas de sedimentos fluviales. Se distingue un horizonte Ah (0-9 cm) encima de un horizonte C1 (9-50 cm), ambos caracterizados por una textura franco arenosa (arena 60-66 %). El horizonte subyacente C2, hasta una profundidad de 120 cm, es muy pedregoso (> 50 % de piedras), con una mezcla de material pétreo de piedras, grava y arena, lo que no permitió la toma de muestras. El horizonte Ah presenta una estructura migajosa de worm casts con una intensidad mediana de raíces (W3, 6-10 raíces/dm 2 ), mientras el horizonte subyacente C1 se caracteriza por una estructura granular; en ninguno de estos dos horizontes se observan moteados o concreciones. Estas características indican que el drenaje interno del perfil es bueno (Anexo 1.8.3).El perfil 4 se encuentra en la ribera del río Suntulín y está compuesto por diferentes capas de sedimentos fluviales. Hasta una profundidad de 140 cm se distinguen seis horizontes. A primera vista, destaca que el horizonte C1 está separado del C3 por una capa de material fluvial de piedras, grava y gravilla (horizonte C2). El perfil está cubierto por un horizonte Ah delgado de solamente 2 cm, con una estructura migajosa de formación biológica y una intensidad de raíces extremadamente fuerte (W6). Se caracteriza, además, por una muy baja resistencia a la penetración. El Ah presenta, en estado seco, color marrón (10YR 3/2), y en estado húmedo, un color marrón grisáceo muy oscuro (10YR 5/3) (Anexo 1.8.4). El horizonte subyacente C1 se caracteriza por una estructura angular blocosa con agregados cerrados, una textura franco arenosa, así como una resistencia a la penetración muy alta.Dado que, al momento de la descripción del perfil, el horizonte C1 en estado seco se presentó extremadamente duro y compacto, la toma de muestras inalteradas de cilindros no fue posible, razón por la cual no se cuenta con datos de densidad aparente para este horizonte. Sin embargo, se observa una densidad mediana (W3) de raíces. Además, el horizonte C1 presenta muy pocos (1 %) moteados de hierro, lo que indica que durante lluvias fuertes el drenaje interno puede ser reducido por poco tiempo. El color, tanto en estado seco como húmedo, sigue siendo igual que en el Ah (Anexo 1.8.4).El horizonte pedregoso C2 muestra en la poca fracción fina una fuerte intensidad de raíces (W4, 11-20/dm 2 ). Esta densidad se reduce a mediana en el horizonte C3 subyacente, el cual se caracteriza por una textura arenosa y estructura granular, con una media-baja resistencia a la penetración. Llama la atención que, a pesar de su textura arenosa, la densidad aparente es baja, de solo 1,17 (Tabla 103). En comparación con los horizontes suprayacentes Ah y C1, en estado húmedo se observa un ligero cambio de color del suelo a marrón amarillento (10YR 3/6). En los horizontes C4 y C5, la intensidad de raíces se reduce a débil (W2, 3-5 raíces/dm 2 ). Ambos horizontes se caracterizan por una textura franco arenosa; sin embargo, varían en su estructura y densidad aparente: mientras el C4 presenta una estructura subangular blocosa, con agregados finos entre 3 y 6 mm, y una densidad aparente baja de 1,11, el horizonte C5 se caracteriza por una estructura masiva coherente y una densidad aparente más alta de 1,31. A pesar de que se presenta un horizonte muy pedregoso a una profundidad entre 26-53 cm, la zona efectiva de enraizamiento es profunda, ya que se observan raíces hasta una profundidad de 140 cm. Aunque el horizonte C2 -por su pedregosidad -y el C3 -por su textura arenosa -reducen la capacidad de campo utilizable para las plantas, se calcula un total de 149 mm, lo que se considera un valor mediano-alto (Tabla 104). El pH varía en un rango de 5,77 a 6,07, lo que se califica moderadamente ácido. El contenido de materia orgánica y de nitrógenos solamente muestra u nivel medio en el horizonte C1, igual que el contenido de fósforo. En todos los horizontes subyacentes los contenidos de materia orgánica, nitrógeno y fósforo se encuentran en un nivel bajo (Tabla 105). Con respecto a las bases intercambiables, se destaca lo siguiente: el calcio (Ca) se encuentra en un nivel medio en todos los horizontes (5,01-9,0 Cmol c /kg), mientras el magnesio (Mg) muestra a lo largo de todo el perfil niveles altos (1,01-2,0 Cmol c /kg). El potasio (K) presenta un nivel muy alto en el horizonte C1, y niveles medios en los horizontes subyacentes. El sodio (Na) es muy bajo en todos los horizontes. Los bases intercambiables totales presentan, en los horizontes C1 a C3, un nivel medio, y en los horizontes subyacentes un nivel alto en el límite inferior de la clasificación (nivel alto: 11,01-15,0 Cmol c /kg). La capacidad de intercambio catiónico (CIC) en los horizontes superiores (C1 y C3) se encuentra entre bajo y muy bajo, mientras en los horizontes C4 y C5 se eleva a niveles medio-alto y alto. Las relaciones catiónicas muestran niveles aceptables en los horizontes superiores (Ca1 y C3), mientras en los horizontes subyacentes (C4 y C5) se evidencian deficiencias de Mg y K. Debido a que el suelo está desarrollado en materiales fluviales y a que tiene ≥ 40 % en volumen de fragmentos gruesos en un horizonte dentro 50 cm de profundidad, se clasifica como un Episkeletic Fluvisol.COSUDE (Agencia Suiza para el Desarrollo y la Cooperación); SAG-DICTA (Secretaría de Agricultura y Ganadería -Dirección de Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria). ( 2022). Historias de éxito -Promoviendo un modelo de agricultura resiliente en la cuenca del río Goascorán con la implementación de prácticas y tecnologías de adaptación al cambio climático y el fortalecimiento de capacidades. Programa de Gestión Comunitaria de Cuencas -nuestra cuenca Goascorán (PGCC-ncG) -Fase II. Honduras. Densidad aparente (g/cm 3 )1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9Arena pura Ss --38 30 23 ----13 13 13 ----10 10 -- Densidad aparente (g/cm 3 )1, 1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 Fuertemente ácido 5,1-5,5 Toxicidad moderada por Al y Mn, deficiencia de P, S, Mo y bases, altos niveles de algunos micronutrientes.Moderadamente ácido 5,6-6,0No se espera la toxicidad por Al, mayor disponibilidad de P, S, Mo y bases, algunos cultivos susceptibles a la acidez requieren encalamiento.Ligeramente ácido 6,1-6,5 Adecuada condición para la disponibilidad de nutrientes para las plantas.Neutro 6,6-7,3 Altos niveles de Ca, Mg, algunos cultivos pueden mostrar deficiencias de micronutrientes, la disponibilidad de P puede ser baja.Alcalino 7,4-8,0 Baja disponibilidad de P y micronutrientes, altos niveles de Ca y Mg.Muy alcalino > 8,0 Severas limitaciones en la disponibilidad de algunos nutrientes, el nivel de Na puede ser tóxico. A6 Aporte de nutrientes del suelo, calculado de 0-30 cm en cada perfil "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2371515171.json b/main/part_2/2371515171.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c3872854ac2706f23c9e22b1a2af2f3c49d71f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2371515171.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9245b7ece853f176e270abc9f7fbc924","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1081c181-c7fc-45a0-b943-c816848736f3/retrieve","id":"41028978"},"keywords":["Citizen Science","Data Collection","Community Engagement","Sustainable Development"],"sieverID":"dcf4a523-e39e-4757-afd5-1bcab2f381a9","content":"This report provides an overview of the mini Stream Assessment Scoring System (miniSASS) and South African Scoring System Version 5 (SASS5) as biomonitoring techniques for assessing the ecological condition of streams and rivers based on the identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates. While miniSASS relies on minimally trained citizen scientists to identify macroinvertebrates at the Order-level, SASS5 utilizes expertly accredited practitioners for finer resolution, even up to the family-level. However, the reliance on citizen scientists for miniSASS identification introduces limitations in terms of precision, accuracy, and reliability. To address these limitations, ongoing developments within the CGIAR Initiative on Digital Innovation include the creation of a miniSASS smartphone application, an upgraded website, an interactive online course, and a machine-learning identification algorithm to assist with photo identification. Additionally, a revised dichotomous key has been developed to improve operator identification during miniSASS surveys. Furthermore, the potential for upscaling the machine-learning identification algorithm to assist in identifying the 91 family-level taxa used in SASS5 assessments has been explored. The outcomes of these developments and explorations presented in this paper aim to enhance the overall effectiveness and reliability of both the miniSASS and SASS5 techniques. By leveraging digital innovation and incorporating machine-learning technology, we anticipate the efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of biomonitoring assessments will significantly improve, ultimately contributing to a better understanding and management of our aquatic ecosystems.Within the CGIAR Initiative on Digital Innovation, GroundTruth, in conjunction with the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and North-West University (NWU), are researching and developing digital innovations pertaining to the mini stream assessment scoring system (miniSASS) (Pattinson et al. 2023). The concept of miniSASS was developed in South Africa, based on the South African Scoring System (SASS) Version 5 (Dickens and Graham 2002;Graham, Dickens, and Taylor 2004), where one could sample aquatic macroinvertebrates and infer the ecological condition of a stream or river from the different relationships (i.e., specific, different sensitivities and tolerances) that different taxa of aquatic macroinvertebrates share with their environment (Dickens and Graham 2002;Morse et al. 2007;Ndatimana et al. 2023;Odountan et al. 2019;Paisley et al. 2014).Both miniSASS and SASS5 rely on sampling and accurately identifying the aquatic macroinvertebrates in a stream or river. For miniSASS, the macroinvertebrates need to be identified to an Order-level grouping (Graham et al. 2004), while for SASS5 the resolution is much finer, for most taxa going to family-level groupings (Dickens and Graham 2002). MiniSASS has been recognized as a promising tool both locally in South Africa (Graham and Taylor 2018), as well as internationally for reporting on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (Taylor et al. 2022).MiniSASS is a low-cost, relatively simple technique, with no requirement for laboratory analyses; miniSASS surveys result in a real-time estimate of river health (Graham et al. 2004;Taylor et al. 2022). SASS5, which is designed for Southern Africa but also employed elsewhere by both private and government entities, is used for assessing the ecological condition of streams and rivers with greater certainty than offered by the more simplistic miniSASS (Bere and Nyamupingidza 2014;Fourie et al. 2014). In SASS5, the assessment results are computed as two index scores, the average score per taxon (ASPT), and the SASS5 score (Dickens and Graham 2002). These scores can also be used to inform a macroinvertebrate response index (MIRAI), which details the observed families against expected, and results in an ecological classification of the stream or river on a scale from natural or pristine through to severely modified (for further detail, see Thirion 2007).MiniSASS has limitations regarding its precision and accuracy, since it relies on identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates by minimally trained citizen scientistsidentification which can be subject to error. For miniSASS, the score can change significantly based on misidentification. For example, a miniSASS survey in a rocky stream that finds four groups including 'Worms' [score 2], 'Minnow mayflies' [score 5], 'Snails / clams / mussels' [score 4] and 'Damselflies' [score 4], changes from an average score of 3.75 (very poor condition) to an average score of 7 (good condition) if the fourth group is misidentified as 'Stoneflies' [score 17]. Ultimately, doubt over the accuracy, validity, and reliability of river health assessments generated using miniSASS detracts from its use, impact, trustworthiness, and broader uptake.For miniSASS to be regarded with scientific credibility, the data must be considered high quality, trustworthy and accurate (Arndt et al. 2022;Buytaert et al. 2014;Hulbert et al. 2019). Concerns over identification error are not considered a large issue for SASS5, where practitioners in southern Africa are generally well-trained and may even be examined on their identification abilities before being accredited in use of the SASS5 technique. However, identification can always be improved to minimize error and speed up identification.Another limitation inherent with miniSASS and SASS5 was traditionally that data was captured manually in-field. The data would then need to be manually uploaded to the miniSASS website at a later stage, creating not only room for error in data capture, but also the potential that the data would not be captured in a database at all if the person who did the survey never uploaded it.Recently, SASS5 has had a mobile application (app) launched that assists with data capture in-field, improving both the accuracy and speed of data capture, as well as the efficiency of data reporting 1 . However, there remains a clear need for digital innovation in the arena of aquatic biomonitoring with miniSASS and, potentially, SASS5. There are various ongoing developments within the CGIAR Initiative on Digital Innovation concerning miniSASS, including research and development of a miniSASS smartphone app, an upgraded miniSASS website 2 , an online, interactive course for miniSASS 3 , and a machine-learning (ML) identification algorithm for deep neural network assistance with identification of the aquatic macroinvertebrates from photographs taken by the miniSASS operator taken in-field (for more details, see Pattinson et al. 2022). Further to those developments, it was recognized that miniSASS operator identification (which happens in addition to the ML identification of photographs, creating two layers of identification security to improve identification and data reliability) would be improved by development of a revised, digitally interactive dichotomous key for miniSASS. This was determined because the original dichotomous key (a static, illustrated document) still left room for confusion or misidentification where branches in the key were not easy to understand or interpret for novice users. Revising the key into a digitally innovative format aimed to make using it more 1 Forthcoming; the announcement video clip available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2yADWef0sw 2 https://minisass.org/en 3 https://groundtruth.plutolmsapp.com/enrol/index.php?id=374 friendly, intuitive, and accurate for a miniSASS operator, thus improving their identification accuracy and confidence, especially for novice operators.Separately, the development of ML identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates from photographs for miniSASS also raised the possibility of using the technique during SASS5 assessments. Therefore, the potential for extension of the ML identification algorithm to SASS5 level to potentially assist in identifying the 91 family-level taxa used for SASS5, was explored. This report relays the outcomes of those processes and explorations.With the launch of the miniSASS mobile app, in-field data collection has been digitally enhanced. MiniSASS operators can now collect photographs of the sample site, capture a range of anecdotal data (e.g., clarity tube measurements, dissolved oxygen levels, or qualitative descriptions), and, most importantly, capture photographs of the macroinvertebrates they sample. Within the mobile app, there is a built-in ML algorithm that provides identification predictions for the aquatic macroinvertebrates sampled based on the photographs the operator takes of each one. This both helps guide the operator in their identifications and provides its own objective identifications and resulting miniSASS score. However, the miniSASS operator still needs to identify all their specimens manually as well. This is where the dichotomous key is relevantit assists a miniSASS operator to manually identify all their specimens accurately. The result is that each miniSASS assessment completed using the mobile app will have photographs of all the specimens found, coupled with separate (though ideally identical) identifications and miniSASS scores based first on the operator's identifications (assisted by the dichotomous key), and second on the ML algorithm's identification predictions.A dichotomous key is a tool or method used to aid in the identification of organisms. Dichotomous keys comprise decision tree systems, whereby the user is offered pairwise decisions at each branch, deciding on which diagnostic features align with the organism as they move along the tree. The traits that split each decision of the tree range widely, from specific morphological or physiological characteristics, to general identifiers such as belonging to a certain high-level taxonomic group. The features are organismal traits that cascade in specificity, with each split along the decision tree growing more specific until a unique identity can be reached.Within a dichotomous key, the decision-making process starts at a single node. Thereafter, the decisions progress stepwise via paired splits, where the user selects which of two branches they will continue down at each decision node. Ultimately, by progressing to the conclusion of these pairwise identifier splits, the user ends up with the logical identification of the organism to a specified or desired taxonomic level.Within miniSASS, users are required to identify all the aquatic macroinvertebrates they sample and assign them as belonging to one of 13 miniSASS groupings. The groups are at roughly Order level, though they do not all correspond perfectly with Order-level taxonomy given the taxonomic difficulties associated with global classification of aquatic macroinvertebrates (Bouchard Jr et al. 2005;Guareschi and Wood 2019;Jones 2008). The miniSASS groups found are then used to determine the miniSASS score and the inferred ecological condition of the stream or river being surveyed. Naturally, this process necessitates that miniSASS operators are able to identify all the aquatic macroinvertebrates they sample. This is where the miniSASS dichotomous key is required to aid in classifying each of the organisms found into their relevant miniSASS group. To-date, miniSASS operators have been provided with a dichotomous key that they can use in-field (Figure 1).The development of the miniSASS mobile app raised the possibility to digitize the key, so that it could be navigated intuitively on the app, without the need for a static print-out.To transcribe the original miniSASS dichotomous key would require each of the decision nodes to be displayed in a separate interface, together with their relevant ancillary descriptive data. The ancillary information comprises short descriptions of the diagnostic features separating the node decision branches, as well as images of the relevant trait where possible (e.g., images of each of the different morphological features that separate out at a decision node). A system with this design would substantially increase the size of the app, creating issues for downloading, mobile data use, and storage space on the smartphones carrying the app.In addition to the concerns over the practicality and appropriateness of directly digitizing the original key, there are issues with decision nodes that are based on technically incorrect information, or ambiguities over the focal feature. This arose given that complex information, particularly regarding morphological structural differences, were simplified for the purposes of a citizen scientist who perhaps has little experience with identifying aquatic macroinvertebrates being able to navigate the key.An example of possible oversimplification is that to reach the 'Damselflies' group following the key, one would follow this key pathway: Legs → clearly defined legs → three pairs of legs → no wings → tail → elongated tail → generally three tails → no feathery gills on abdomen. These decisions are based on what is generally visible to the naked eye for the average damselfly specimen, and how those traits would be interpreted by the average user. However, technically the decision nodes for 'tail', 'elongated tail', 'generally three tails', and 'no feathery gills on abdomen' are morphologically incorrect and can be misleading. In fact, damselfly larvae do not technically have tails. Rather, the protrusions at the posterior of their bodies are gills (that look like a tail to an inexperienced person). The gills are 'leaf' or 'paddle' shaped, and not 'feathery'.An example of ambiguity inherent in the original key is in the classification pathway (though, again, this was done purposefully based on how lay citizen scientists would interpret what they were seeing) is that for the 'Bugs and beetles' grouping. In the pathway to arrive at 'Bugs and beetles', the second decision node requires the user to identify if the organisms have legs or not. The user should select that they do have clear legs. However, in the case of the Psephenidae (commonly known as water penny beetles) the legs are seldom visible. Consequently, the classification of Psephenidae, or of organisms with similar unclear morphological characteristics, becomes difficult and frustrating when using the naked eye. Most of the miniSASS groups are highly diverse containing organisms with considerable morphological variation. Therefore, it becomes challenging to create single decision nodes that describe the morphological features of all the organisms within a group.Considering these issues, a different approach to implementing and designing a new dichotomous key for miniSASS was undertaken to ensure the key presented in the mobile app is easy to use, simple and intuitive for the miniSASS operator to identify their specimens.Translating and transcribing the physical dichotomous key to use into digital format accessible via a mobile app required making large changes to the layout and operation of the key. Inherently, the changes increase the complexity of the key, so maintaining ease of use was imperative to ensure that the key still performed its core function of helping minimally trained citizen scientists identify aquatic macroinvertebrates to the miniSASS standard. Part of the need for intuitive use is the need for speed with identification, so that miniSASS surveys are efficient.The first core design feature of the new key was that it would be based on a filtering system. For a filtering approach, a list of initial broad morphological characteristics relevant to each of the 13 miniSASS group classifications is provided. Some of the decision nodes in the original dichotomous key were reused, where appropriate (e.g., has a shell, defined legs, has a clear tail, or has a long thin body). However, numerous new criteria have been added increasing the number of morphological characteristics in the key, thereby encompassing most of the morphological variation within each of the groups. These new criteria include features such as having a rounded body, a relatively short tail, and/or paddleshaped gills. A list of 22 morphological features is used in the digital key (Table 1). Many of the groups share similar criteria, but each group will be defined by either a single unique feature, or a unique combination of features.When a miniSASS operator opens the key a list of all 22 feature filters is given, together with an image or images (i.e., real photographs, not drawings) illustrating an example of the typical appearance of the relevant feature (Figure 2). Additionally, a short description for each filter is available with an information icon next to the filter; selecting this information icon will bring up some extra information as well as an enlarged image of the typical appearance of the feature to help with identification.To use the key, the operator needs to examine each aquatic macroinvertebrate they have sampled and, for each different specimen, individually go through to the list of features and select those which the organism has. Based on the selection, organisms that have the selected feature will appear at the top of the filter as potential identifications. Organisms not described by the selected feature will not be listed as options. As the operator progresses with the filter selecting more features that describe the specimen, the number of potential identifications listed at the top of the filter will reduce until only a single option remains. In this way, an operator does not need to select all the relevant features that describe the specimen. As they progress through the key, it is only important that the features which are unique identifiers end up being selected. Essentially, as more features are selected, the options for what the specimen could be will grow narrower until only a single identification option remains available based on the combination of features selected.If an operator selects the filter for 'three pairs of legs', all the groups that contain organisms with three pairs of legs will be given in the list at the top of the filter, while those that do not possess three pairs of legs will not appear. Many groups have three pairs of legs, but this will rule out the 'Flatworms', 'Snails / clams / mussels', 'Crabs and shrimps', 'Trueflies', 'Leeches' and 'Worms' groups. If the user then also selects 'long thin body', only two groups are left that have a combination of 'three pairs of legs' and a 'long thin body'the 'Damselflies' and 'Caddisflies' (Figure 3).The remaining filters in the list that are not associated with 'Damselflies' or 'Caddisflies' groups are removed and only those that potentially distinguish these groups from each other remain. The operator can then continue to select features until only a single identification option remains. For example, if the user then selected 'feather-like gills', then only the 'Caddisflies' would have all the selected features leaving them as the only option for selection (Figure 4). If a user is either unsure of the morphological feature they selected, or not convinced by the resulting identification options, they can select or deselect features from the filter list and compare identification options as they go. In comparison to the original key method, the number of decisions needed to classify an organism as belonging to the caddisfly group can potentially be reduced from seven necessary decision nodes down to just to three.In some instances, a user can select the morphological feature that is unique to a certain group from the beginning if they can clearly observe it. For example, if a user observes short stubby legs present on an organism and they select that filter from the Table 1 The 22 features used in the new mini stream assessment scoring system (miniSASS) dichotomous key filter system. For each of the 13 miniSASS groups, an 'x' is shown if they possess the feature. Each miniSASS group is defined by a unique combination of features. 2. Fourteen of the 22 filters available at the first step of using the new mini stream assessment scoring system (miniSASS) dichotomous key as they appear within the miniSASS mobile application (app). Images illustrate an example of the typical appearance of each of the features, with information icons (i) providing options to view ancillary information about each of the features.Figure 3. With both the '3 pairs of legs' and 'long thin body' filters selected, only two identification optionsdamselflies and caddisfliesremain. The features still listed are those that could be used to separate the two groups, while features that describe neither of those groups have been removed from the filter options. The mini stream assessment scoring system (miniSASS) operator will need to keep selecting features from the filter list which the specimen in question has until a unique combination describing only one possible miniSASS group remains. The image is displayed as a screenshot of how it appears in the miniSASS mobile application (app).Figure 4. With the '3 pairs of legs', 'long thin body', and 'feather-like gills' features selected, the only possible identification that remains is the caddisflies group (of the 13 mini stream assessment scoring system (miniSASS) groups). Notably, the only features left that can still be selected all fit for caddisflies, but they need not all be selected to arrive at a unique identification. The image is displayed as a screenshot of how it appears in the miniSASS mobile application (app).list, the only identification option available will be the 'Trueflies', given that that is the only group that has that feature. The same is true for a 'shell', which characterizes only the 'Snails / clams / mussels' group, or the 'rounded body' which characterizes only the 'Bugs and beetles' group.The use of ML for the identification and classification of macroinvertebrate groups used in miniSASS presents an exciting integration of modern artificial intelligence (AI) technology into ecology and biomonitoring. The ML identification model in miniSASS is used to classify organisms within one of 13 broad, Order-level groups. These groups contain considerable morphological diversity.Therefore, being able to assign unique identifiers for the purposes of ML classification represents an important milestone in the utility of AI in ecology. However, ongoing development has highlighted that the use of ML to aid in the automatic verification of miniSASS survey scores, via auto-verifying identifications, still requires further refinement and development.Taxonomic resolution presents a significant challenge for the identification and classification accuracy of an ML algorithm.The finer the taxonomic resolution, the more specific, unique morphological variation there is among different groups. In theory, this should make it easier to assign unique features to each specified group. In the case of coarser taxonomic resolution, there is less uniquely identifiable morphological variation between organisms since the groups will include an increasing number of increasingly dissimilar organisms, making them harder to all identify within the same group.Essentially, the more specific the group, and the finer the resolution, the easier it is to distinguish an individual as part of that group. A simple illustration of this would be to consider vehicles: it would be difficult to assign unique identifiers between vehicles if one was looking at a course resolution. Many different vehicles have four wheels, a windshield, a chassis, wing mirrors, four doors, etc. However, as the resolution gets finer and is based on make, model, year of production, and finally on license plate and engine number, it is easier to define different vehicles by a unique identifier.The classification of organisms used in SASS5 is based on family level identification, a much finer resolution than that used in miniSASS. With the finer taxonomic resolution, the variation becomes more specific (with individuals at higher taxonomic resolution more alike and more specifically different from others). Therefore, classifying organisms into a specific family should be easier. However, practically, this is not always the case with developing ML identification models. The more specific the groupings, and the finer the nuances of unique identifiers, the greater the amount of training data that will be required to get the model to find, define, and consistently identify those unique features. A SASS5 assessment requires identification of specimens into one of 91 potential families of aquatic macroinvertebrates. Consequently, the number of images needed to train the ML identification algorithm is substantially larger than that required for classification into just 13 miniSASS groups.In development of a deep neural network ML identification model, it is recommended that a minimum of 1000 images are used for training for each group. This results in roughly 91,000 images, as a minimum, for training an ML identification algorithm to be functional at SASS5 resolution.For greater accuracy, a 10-fold increase is recommended for retraining the algorithm, raising the required number of images to 910,000. As a result, the use of ML to identify and classify aquatic macroinvertebrates for the purposes of in SASS5 presents a real challenge simply because of the number of images needed to train and retrain the ML identification algorithm to enable accurate classification and identification. However, it remains possible, especially if the number of images required decreases because of the higher taxonomic resolution. With images being collected by people nationwide for miniSASS assessments, it is plausible that the required number of images to train an ML identification algorithm for SASS5 may one day be captured."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2375484528.json b/main/part_2/2375484528.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a077fa45bb961b70a13a622c0fe0ade7f3ba3255 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2375484528.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b62a44f64c324b7a3708de97eb8ea0e4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H026012.pdf","id":"833923221"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"825a78c3-6a1a-4487-8918-c00ff52d1dc9","content":"I N 1' RO o u CT I o N Tlie Government of Sindh has enacted a law to establish tlie Sindh Irrigatioii and Drainage Authority (SIDA) The four ~ main objectives for tlie SIDA act are to: decentralize the inanageinent of the irrigation and drainage system; to establish more responsive, efficient and transparent management, to ensure equity of water dtstnbutton and effective drainage management, and to Introduce participatory and financially self-supporting management The package of institutional reforms proposed by the Government t ncludes three components transformation of PlDs to autotioiiiotis PIDAs, creation of AWBs; and encouragttig forination of FOs at the distributary or iiiitior level through a pilot projects Tlie law empowers SIDA to promote tlie fortnation of Farmers Organizations around dtstrtbutary and niltior canals (Bandaragoda et al, I9971 Tlie Action Research Program of tlie 'Pilot Project for Farmer-Managed Irrigated Agriculture\" in Si ndh provi lice of Pakistan has been undertaken by the Inteniational Irrigation Management Institute ( I ItL11). The prograiii aims at enabling these Fanners' Organizations (FOs) to asstiiiie responsibilities for operation and maintenance (O&M), recover tlie cost through collection of water and drainage charges, and improve water management practices. Considering tlie complex social context a-four-phase process is adopted, wliich includes: (1) support mobilization; ( 2 ) itiitiA organization; (3) orgmiization consolidation and (3) organization action. During the first phase of the project tlie FOs were formed at the Bareji Distributary, Heraii Distributary and Dlioro Naro Minor in the districts, Mirpurklias, Satigliar and Nawabshah, respectively by 11MI. The project expects to forin farmer organizations on additional 10 distributaries at Jamrao Canal command area through National Drainage Program (NDP) Sindh.Viability of an organization depends on its strength to make internal ntles and to apply these rules effectively. Collective action enliarices the effect of individual actions. However, considering that soiiie persons' enhanced actions are likely to adversely affect tlie welfare of the others, the organization also lias to collectively restrain individual action whenever necessary. Thus, the use of agreed rules becomes important, and an apt definition that is related to users groups is that \"an institution is collective action in restraint, liberation a i d expansion of individual action\" (Parsons I984:28).It lias been expected that by the end of the 1990s, farmers will be able to tiiobilize all the resources required for operation and maintenance of the portiotis of irrigation systems under their tnanagement (IMPSA 1991). Upasena et. a1 1996 clearly mention that tlie sttccess of the participatoiy management policy requires tlie development of effective institutions among fariiiers for irrigation management..4fter formation of FOs on pilot distributaries,,.second step is to register them with SIDA. Tlie registration would legally empower FOs, enable them to mutually prepare and sign tlie irrigation transfer management document to take over tlie responsibility of irrigation system. This has not yet been possible, as the Government of Sindh lias not approved the niles and regulations.The paper presents sotlie of lessons are I inportant for the other interested organizations, individuals agencies to understand, and conceptualize the process of establishing fanners' organizations.G overt1 iiieii t's Co ti1 mi tmen t Most of the water users interviewed wished that political influence should be avoided in the formation of proposed FOs and AWBs. As tlie PlDA iiistitutioiial reforms have a potential of bringing a significant change in tlie socio-economic status of the majority of the people in tlie area, there should be adequate safeguards against tlie possible obstacles that can be caused by a few who niiglit get affected iii tlie short term. Some argue that tlie sustainability of the proposed changes cannot be en\\isaged Lvitliout a clear goveriiment conimitment to devise such safeguards, including effccti\\,e land refot-ms.Tlie irrigation and power department lias provided essential support from tlie very beginning of the estended project and also support to form tlie fanners' organizations at tlie new distributaries/ minors. Tlie support from the agencies shall have to be continued, even after the irrigation management transfer is coniplete.Tlic Lvater iisers were of the opinion that tilore than fifty percent of the members in the Area \\Vater Boards aiid SiD.4 should be farmer representatives selected by the distributary level FOs. This strategy alone could avert any undue influence of tlie existing political and h.:eaucratic systenis on the smooth functioning of the new organizations. The water users perceive that tlie establishment of the SIDA in this more transparent aiid more deiiiocratic tiiaiitier will have a greater chance of improving the reliability and eqiiitability of water distribution in the canal system. The reliable and equitable supply of tlie irrigation water, ratli'er than more water, is tlie essential requirement for i tiiproviiig agriculture production.There is a \\videspread belief aniong the water users that a iiiore democratically constituted SIDA-A\\VB-FO system wit11 adequate people's participation will improve the maintenance and operation of tlie canal system, which lias deteriorated due to prolonged maintenance deficiencies. Consequently, the supply of water will be improved and shortages, particularly at the tail elid of the system, can be overcome. Further, the performance of lower level irrigation staff will significantly improve when they are made accountable to tlie FOs.One of the major activities in the organizational consolidation phase is to obtain the necessary stipport for tlie fledgling farmer organizations to be institutionalized within the broader socioeconomic environment. This support lias to be solicited from tlie government, \\vhich is the appropriate authority to provide an enabling environment for social organization as oiie of its prime responsibilities in instittitional development. The Government's demonstrated willingness to accept these new organizations 011 the basis of a legal framework, including a mechanisiii for their registration, would greatly facilitate the process of FOs gaining wide recognition as an institution, or as a useful formal group (Bandaragoda et al, 1997).The transparency in accounts is important in a fanners' organization to gain the trust among their members. record of the funds generated by tlie FO in the shape of membership fee and donations from the nieinbers has been properly maintained by the FO Treasurer and was audited by tlie Chartered ,4ccountant during the month of July 1999. The members also present their financial position in the been that every member has a right to check the accounts It is observed that the selection for the position of treasurers of watercourse association and farmers organization is based on honesty and most of the treasurers are selected on their pre\\ious record of honesty.Po I it ic s ;ire 110 t i iivolved .4l most all the water users \\vho have been selected as office bearers and the management committee inembers are associated with one of the political parties of the country. It is worth mentioning that these members have never used their political platform to get these positions.Successful iniplementation and the sustenance of participatory irrigation management depend upon the roles effectively played by the farmers and various govertmient agencies responsible to elistire inputs and extension services. The services of Non-Goveriitiient Organizations (NGOs) are also essential to bridge the service gaps between tlie fanners and the various goveriuiient agencies. ( Elutiialai, 1997).The actual responsibility for organizing water users lay with the operating agencies and the water users themselves, while IIMI's field tealis played a catalyst's role in social organization activities.To gi\\,e effect to this \"ownership\" concept, the strategy was to introduce a mechatiistii to have the pnrticipatton of a number of selected representatives froiii field level agency staff (Irrigation, On-Farm \\Vater hlanagemeiit, Agriculture Extension, Agriculture Bank, Agriculture Development .4uthority, etc.). This arrangement was called the Field Implementation Coordination Committee (FICC), \\vIiicli was meant to help the catalyst, as well as tlie participating agency field staff and \\vater users to collaborate Lvitli one another closely on a regular basis It \\xis obsewed that sooii after the introduction of FICC, all the related government agencies and fnrtiier representatives, formed a convenient platform to discuss farmers' cotiiiiion problems related to irriigtion services and agricultural production. The most important aspect of the FICC's success \\vas that tlie discussions 011 probletiis were soon followed by some actions to bring the relevant senices to the field. the support of various FICC members, the identified activities were carried out at the farm level for the socio-economic benefit of the farmers.The concept of involving community-based local volunteers in the social organisation lvork \\vas iiitroduced \\vith the purpose to use them as a bridge between the small field team and the coiiiiiiunity. Selecting soiiie suitable persons from the local conimunity as volunteers was an tiiiportaiit strategy in the social organization process. The volunteers identified were named as \"Social Organisation Volunteers\" (SOVs). hlembers of the community, who were adequately informed about the community and its needs, atid prepared to assist the action research process, were selected. Tlie methodology of using local volunteers had tlie following advantages: 0 Interventions could be routed through local people, causing little room for mistrust; The SOVs could reach the community in the pilot distributary command area fairly quickly, partially meeting the projects time constraint; a i d .4s SOVs were deployed on a voluiitary basis, the method was cost-effective and could easily be applied on a wider scale.Capacity Building of the Users Tlie experiences gained through the pilot project show that water users are instntniental and financial) as there are contributing in cash, kind of operating and maintaining tlie tertiary unit. Farmers can contribute to system's improvement through financial atid human resources and have an impressive capacity to articulate their problems.An organisation can eventually grow into an institution when it establishes persistent patterns of tiortiis and beliaviour cotiinionly accepted as valuable a i d useful to the membership. By then, it will have established accepted sets of rules a i d procedures for various functions of collective action. Such a system of rules cannot just happen, or spring up on administrative fiat, but it has to evolve over time. Only at this mature stage can a water users' organisation exercise successful collective action to both liberate and restraint individual water user's actions for tlie benefit of the group as a \\vliole. The acceptability of the organisation by a substantial majority of its membership is an essential characteristic that deteriiiines its effectiveness in undertaking continuing tasks of water resources management, such as caial iiiaintenance, water distribution, fee collection, conflict resolution and imposition of sanctions.The experience of mobilizing users for participatary water management gained by tlie action research program that the users are willing and capable to assume the new responsibility, but that the Government is not yet fully prepared for this change, as the bylaws have not yet been finalized. This sometimes makes it difficult even in tlie context of pilot projects to achieve significant progress I I I part i ci pat ory water ilia nage me ti t.The pilot projects have proved that farmer orgauzations (FOs) are socially viable and the members are ready to take tlie respotisibilities of operation a i d maintenance of distributaries in addition to assessing and collecting abiyana (water charges). However the of these FOs need to be tested."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2376965460.json b/main/part_2/2376965460.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37806f22f7b2ecb4687177a6045db45c5821942b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2376965460.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7a3fe8d5edf0d628d322e1ca2638ea21","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/93830136-096d-4a7c-956e-108769a4ccc8/retrieve","id":"-1963573466"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"35e93b20-61a1-4906-a2d7-e3ee1df94f2c","content":"Sweetpotato is considered a climate adaptation option due to its relative tolerance to heat and salinity. The Mekong Region is the largest sweetpotato producing area in Vietnam with a stable export market demand. CGIAR Asian Mega Deltas Initiative has been exploring the potential of incorporating sweetpotato production in the rice cropping system in this region. A rice-sweetpotato crop rotation has a number of environmental and agronomic advantages for farmers such as pathogen control in the soil, greenhouse gas emission reduction, and the utilization of plots with increasing salinity in the areas where it will be difficult to grow rice in the future. Currently, rice-sweetpotato crop rotation is only implemented in some parts of Vinh Long province where sweetpotato is an important cash crop.Understanding farmers' agronomic practices is the first step toward developing site-specific strategies and innovations. Therefore, in November 2023, a household survey was conducted of 89 sweetpotato growing households (11 female and 78 male farm managers) in Bình Tân district, Vĩnh Long province, Vietnam.The findings show that sweetpotato production areas per household vary from 0.3 to 8 ha with an average of 1.1 ha. All respondents purchase planting materials from seed producers or other farmers, with Japanese purple (Khoai lang tím Nhật) grown by 84% of the respondents. Sweetpotatoes can be planted year-round, but the majority (39%) starts planting in February, after the Lunar New Year. Maturity is 120-180 days with an average of around 150 days for both varieties. The average yield is 50t/ha for local white (Khoai Sua) and 32.8t/ha for Japanese purple (Khoai lang tím Nhật). 96% of harvested roots are sold to both domestic and global markets. The main rotation crop is rice (80%) followed by watermelon.Planting density is very high with around 180,000 cuttings per ha (162 cuttings per 9 square meters), which is a farmer strategy to meet the market demand for small-sized roots (300-400g).92% of farmers use N, P2O5, and K2O fertilizers at an average 15.6kg, 15kg and 11kg/ha respectively. However, the total quantity of NPK fertilizer application (including supplemental ingredients) is very high, averaging more than 900kg/ha. Pests and pathogens are a major cause of crop loss. The most affected disease is foot rot (Diaporthe destruens) which 73% of respondents reported. The maximum damage it causes is estimated as 24.8% (5-90%). The most common pest is sweetpotato weevil, reported by 57% of respondents. The estimated maximum damage from the weevil is 28% (1-45%). Most farmers apply synthetic fungicides and insecticides for both prevention and counter actions, typically spraying 10 times or more in one growing season, at an average of 68 liters per ha.The findings from this household survey will be used for on-going sweetpotato breeding experiments in the Mekong Region. Identified constraints will be addressed in collaboration with partners. Table 1: Ridge The Mekong Delta, a fertile alluvial plain, plays a crucial role in the agricultural sector in Vietnam. The favorable soil and climate conditions have been utilized for intensive farming, especially rice production for ensuring national food security. However, in recent years, the rice monoculture farming system is increasingly facing challenge in a climate change context. The government have been turning to crop diversification as a solution toward climate adaptation and more sustainable farming (Dang et al., 2023;Van Kien et al., 2020).Among its diverse crops, sweetpotatoes have gained significance in recent years due to their adaptability, nutritional value, and economic potential. The average annual planting area of sweetpotato in the Delta doubled from 11.06 thousand hectares in the 2000-2004 period to 22.29 thousand hectares in 2015-2019 period (Figure 1). During 2018-2021, the Mekong Delta contribute an average 38% of the annual total sweetpotato production and 19% of the planting area of the whole country (GSO, 2023a(GSO, , 2023b)). In the Mekong Delta, Vinh Long province stands out as the main producer, followed by Dong Thap and Kien Giang (Figure 2). Vinh Long province lies in the central part of the Mekong Delta, nested between the Tien river and Hau river, which supply the province with rich fertile soil and abundant fresh water sources. Being 200km away from the coast, Vinh Long is shielded against saline intrusion. The province has a monsoon tropical climate, with relatively high temperature and humidity all year round. The average temperature hovers around 26-27°C, with an annual sunshine duration of 2,097 hours and annual rainfall from 1,742 mm to 1,864 mm (Vinh Long People's Committee, 2023). However, within the recent three years, the production of sweetpotato in Vinh Long has dramatically declined, especially in 2022 with 29.5 thousand tons, only 12.5% of the previous year and 7.6% of the 2019 peak (Figure 3). Underlying causes might include a combination of factors such as the COVID lockdown and suspension of trading, an emerging disease, and subsequent loss of seed systems and The survey questionnaire was developed based on key questions designed by Ørting et al. (1996) for the survey of the leguminous tuber/root crop Pachyrhizus ahipa in Bolivia. Changes and adjustments to the questions were made to suit the context of sweetpotato production in Vinh Long, and more specific questions were added to further explore details concerning the farmers' use of fertilizer, pesticide, and fungicide on their crops.The questionnaire consists of sections on the production, current agronomic practices, pest and disease problems and management, harvest and storage, breeding, processing as well as socioeconomic aspects of the different sweetpotato varieties. On average, the questionnaire could be completed within 30-60 minutes.The survey was carried out in Binh Tan district in late November 2023. The district was selected for its dominance in sweetpotato production in Vinh Long province and the Mekong Delta in general. Three sweetpotato producing communes in Binh Tan district, namely Thanh Trung, Tan Hung, and Tan Thanh communes (including several households in Tan Binh commune -who previously belonged to Tan Thanh) were selected as study sites. We contacted commune officers and asked them to list sweetpotato producing households. We randomly selected households from the list. Within the household, we invited the person who manage sweetpotato production. As a result, the majority of respondents were men. However, we still did the analysis by gender of the respondents and the areas where there are significant gender differences were highlighted in this report. Some interviews were conducted at the individual farmers' houses, while others were organized at the village head's house, or a convenient location within the commune. Interviews were conducted by trained enumerators using electronic tablets with the KoboCollect app. After the field survey, the electronic dataset was reviewed, revised, and cleaned for processing and analysis. 3 Survey resultsA total of 89 farmers participated in the survey, the majority of which were male (89%) (Figure 4). It is a common fact in the Mekong Delta that men are more often in charge of commercial agricultural production. The respondents are almost evenly distributed among 3 communes, Thành Trung, Tân Hưng and Tân Thành (Tân Bình commune has recently been split from Tân Thành) (Figure 5). The total farm sizes are usually between 1 and 2 hectares (52% of respondents), while 38% have a total area between 0.4 and 0.95 hectares, and only 10% have more than 2.5 hectares. The male farmers generally have bigger farms than the female farmers (1.43 versus 1.28 ha on average, respectively) (Figure 6). Regarding sweetpotato cultivating area specifically, ¾ of the respondents grow 1 hectare or less, followed by 19% between 1.15 and 2 hectares, and only 7% have more than 2 hectares of sweetpotato. The farmers dedicate larger areas to the Japanese purple sweetpotato (1.15 ha on average), compared to other varieties (Figure 7). The main soil types reported by the farmers in this area include acid sulfate soils (63% of the respondents) and river-loam (26%) (Figure 8). This corresponds with the Provincial People's Committee (2020) soil quality survey results, which show that the majority (67%) of the soils in Binh Tan district is categorized as the deep potential acid sulfate type. Almost all (97%) of the respondents grow only one variety, except for only 3 farmers who grew two varieties in the last year (Figure 9). Japanese purple sweetpotato is the predominant variety, grown by 84% of the respondents, followed by the Milky white variety (17%). There is only one case of red and Duong Ngoc varieties each (Figure 10). The majority of the farmers (89%) rotate sweetpotatoes with other crops, mostly rice (80%) and some watermelon (16%) (Figure 11). Many farmers also grow other perennial crops such fruits and coconuts (Figure 13). Most of the farmers till their land once (55%) or twice (42%) to prepare for their sweetpotato crops. Interestingly, while this pattern is true for the Japanese purple variety, most of the Milky white sweetpotato farms (93%, N=15) are tilled once (Figure 14). All of the respondents use tractors for tillage (98% with 4-wheel tractor and 2% with 2-wheel tractor), while ridging is done manually. Tillage depth is mostly 10-30cm (89%). The ridge measurements and spacing can be found on Table 1 below. The measurements and spacing can vary quite a lot among the farmers. The frequency of irrigation varies between 10 and 150 times during the whole season, but most of the respondents (74%) water their fields from 60 to 100 times.100% of the farmers use sweetpotato vines as planting materials.72% of respondents grow 1 crop/year and 28% of respondents grow 2 crops/year (Figure 15). Sweetpotato can be planted any seasons, but the majority starts in February (39%) or November to December (27%) (Figure 16). Horizonal along ridges is the most common method (77% of respondents) for vine planting (Figure 17).The majority (65%) of the farmers plant 3 rows per ridge, while the others plant 2 rows per ridge, or apply mixed arrangements, where more rows are planted near the ends of the ridges than in the middle (e.g., 4-3, 3-2 or 4-2) (Figure 18). Planting distance is narrow, thus the high planting density, mostly 180,000-200,000 plants/ha (Table 2). 100% of the respondents performed no tilling during growth, same with pruning. Lifting vines is not a common practice. Only two respondents do it once or twice at 40 and/or 60 days after planting (Table 3). Fertilization is a common practice in the area (Figure 20), performed on 92% of the farms (N=92). The total frequency of fertilization (among those who perform it) varies from 2 to 15 times, with an average of 7-8 times (Figure 21). All these farmers use synthetic fertilizers, and some (32%) also reported using additional organic fertilizers. NPK mixes are the main type of fertilizers, applied in 98% of these cases (N=85); a few farmers also add DAP or single-nutrient fertilizers to their sweetpotato crops (Figure 22). The more common NPK mixes include 20:20:15 (38%), 16:16:8 (27%) and 16:16:16 (12%) (Table 4). Regarding the quantities of fertilizers, on average, the farmers use 15kg N, 15kg P2O5, and 10kg K2O per ha, respectively (Table 6). However, the total amount of synthetic fertilizer products used by the farmers is very high, especially on Japanese purple sweetpotato farms (N=68) at 929 kg/ha, 35% higher than that on Milky white farms (N=14). The average quantity of organic fertilizers is neglectable (8.6%) compared to that of the synthetic ones in the case of the Japanese purple variety, while it makes up 22% of the total fertilizer amount in the case of the Milky white variety (Figure 23).Yes 92%No 9%Yes 91%Fertilization or not, male responses (N=81) Total quantity of fertilizers (kg/ha), by genderTotal quantity of synthetic fertilizers (kg/ha) Total quantity of organic fertilizers (kg/ha)Diseases and pests remain a serious problem for the farmers in the area. Overall, the main sweetpotato diseases reported by the respondents are foot rot (73%), Fusarium wilt (32%) and Bacterial wilt (29%) (Figure 24), of which maximum damage is estimated at 24.8%, 18.3% and 14.6%, respectively (Figure 26). Foot rot disease appears to be more prevalent among the Japanese purple variety (75%) than the Milky white (60%) (Figure 24). The majority of the respondents (78%) said that they first found foot rot on their sweetpotato farms before 2018 (Figure 25). Some other diseases which occur at low frequency (less than 8%) include \"daisy\" and black rot diseases, sweetpotato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV) disease, scabs, sweetpotato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) disease, etc. To prevent these diseases, the farmers mostly apply fungicide (94% of the cases). In some cases (13%), they treat the soil before planting. Other cultural practices such as using healthy seedlings, proper fertilization and/or irrigation, seedling treatment etc. are not common (less than 2% each) (Figure 27).Once their fields are infected, the main solution is also chemical fungicides (84%) (Figure 28). In terms of pests, weevils and vine borers are the main challenges faced by the farmers (57% and 50%, respectively) (Figure 29), with the estimated maximum damage at 28% and 27% (Figure 30). When it comes to prevention and control, again, pesticide application is the main solution (98% for prevention, and 78% use chemical pesticides for treatment) (Figures 31 and 32). The farmers apply chemical plant protection products frequently on their sweetpotato farms, averaging about 17 times in total per season (consisting of 9 times of insecticides, 6.5 times of fungicide and 1.6 times of herbicide application) (Table 7 & Figure 33). Some farmers (33%) reported damage due to Rain/Irrigation, with an average damage of around 10.7% (Figure 34). None of the respondents reported problems due to the other factors (Temperature, Wind, Hail). No prevention or counter actions were taken against extreme weather. Almost all (99%) of the respondents reported having problems due to rodents. However, the damage is small (Average 6%; Max 11%, Min 4%). Preventive and Counter actions include traps & poison & manual catching.100% of respondents harvest roots and 34% also harvest vines to sell as planting materials (Table 8). The farmers start harvesting vines around 60 days on average, while roots are harvested between 120-180 days with an average of around 150 days for all varieties (Table 9). Average yield varies with varieties. Local milky white and red varieties have high yields of over 50 ton/ha (Figure 35). No respondents store harvested roots as they were sold immediately to buyer, and there is no storage in the households. No respondents perform breeding or vine multiplication, and bought planting materials from other farmers. When asked about the ideal plants, some farmers prefer roots of 15-20cm in length, 300-400g in weight and obovoid shape, and a small number of roots per plant (2-4 roots/plant) (Table 10). Harvested vines and roots are consumed and used for animal feeding but the utilization for animal feeding is limited (Table 12). On average, 96% of the harvested sweetpotatoes were sold to market, indicating that sweetpotato is a cash crop. The average price of Japanese purple roots is slightly higher than that of Milky white (7300 and 6700 VND, or 0.30 and 0.28 USD, per kg, respectively), while the reverse is true for the prices of vines (Figures 38 and 39). Most of the respondents intend to continue growing sweetpotatoes, although 15% of the Japanese purple growers think that they will stop, largely due to limited profit (Figures 40 and 41). The results from the household survey highlight farmers' agronomic practices of growing sweetpotato in the Mekong Delta region where climate change is a serious challenge. The findings show that most farmers here specialize in a single variety, Japanese purple flesh, to sell as storage roots. The vines are little used. This region differs from Northern and North-central coastal regions of Vietnam, where sweetpotatoes, the vines in particular, are often grown for animal feed and home consumption.The total amount of agricultural input varies with varieties. According to those surveyed, the Japanese purple variety requires 1.4 times more synthetic fertilizer input compared to local varieties. No significant difference was reported in pests and diseases by variety, with both local and Japanese purple varieties susceptible to foot rot diseases and sweetpotato weevils.Around 80% of farmers plant planting materials by using a horizontal planting method to produce uniform-sized storage roots and there are usually two or three rows in one ridge to produce small storage roots.The farmers harvest the sweetpotatoes after 120 -180 days, around 150 days on average for both varieties. Most of the surveyed farmers (72%) grow sweetpotatoes once per year, the other 28% twice per year. 100% of the local sweetpotato variety growers and 79% of the Japanese purple sweetpotato growers expressed their intention to continue producing sweetpotato in the coming years, suggesting it is a good option for crop rotation in their rice-based system.These findings also have implications for breeding programs. Firstly, there is a stable market demand for the purple variety, which may be why most farmers grow it despite a higher investment and lower yield compared to the local variety. Secondly, the development of short-duration (90 days) varieties has a great potential as a crop rotation option to fit into the rice-based system. Finally, farmers are intentionally growing small-sized sweetpotatoes to respond to the market demand. Given these factors, breeders need to identify genotypes with more, smaller, marketable roots, rather than focus on overall yield, although they may all be related.Currently farmers depend heavily on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, but more sustainable farming systems will require integrated pest and disease management, as well as more appropriate fertilizer application."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2385954869.json b/main/part_2/2385954869.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ac1ddc722575f199f0c50fcbf066fcc80d21762 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2385954869.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c523a29a6cd60ef6afd171414c6f9559","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2b21759b-ee51-4a6d-a65c-f916b312e3a9/retrieve","id":"1316313469"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5c471fae-c363-4576-8ba4-5c97beedb6c5","content":"A steady supply of quality stress-tolerant seed is necessary, but not sufficient to achieve higher varietal turnover rates. The key to transformation lies in addressing distribution challenges. Research confirmed agro-dealers' and seed companies' overarching supply-push orientation, characterized by limited innovation and risk taking, pointing to the major opportunity of ender-user-driven marketing. The agro-dealer's role in facilitating varietal turnover could be much greater and beneficial to the farmer. This multi-year research generated growing donor and investor interest in seed marketing research.While landraces in Eastern Africa have been replaced by modern varieties for several crops, the slow speed of varietal turnover remains a topic of concern and discussion. The agro-dealer space is where farmers obtain access to various inputs for maize production. Their current and potential role of agro-dealers in facilitating varietal turnover has so far been neglected. A better understanding was needed of the underlying factors that influence interactions between seed companies, seed retailers, and farmers.CGIAR and NARS partner scientists (2020) looked at interactions between farmers and agro-dealers and their impact on seed choices: If agro-dealers engaged in influencing farmer seed choices, they did so successfully. Researchers (2021) also focused on the challenges faced by retailers, seed companies to expand the sale of next maize hybrids. Research results confirmed the overarching supply-push orientation of the industry. Scientists (2021) then looked at the geographical distribution of input markets and the effects of remoteness and competition on seed prices and choice.A steady supply of quality stress-tolerant seed is necessary, but not sufficient to foster greater varietal turnover. The distribution side needs to be adequately addressed. This multi-year research has generated growing donor interest in formal seed systems development and potential investments in seed marketing and distribution research, which may contribute to innovation in seed systems and value chains.• https://www.cimmyt.org/tag/agrodealers/ • https://doi.org/0.1007/s12571-021-01181-9• https://doi.org/10. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2388739174.json b/main/part_2/2388739174.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8b21996bafbbe0aa7bb411b3668c911461825f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2388739174.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ba429cf56b267b2188fdcfbd171277eb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/800aec7e-902a-4f0a-acd0-daf866bed257/retrieve","id":"956910553"},"keywords":["Rural broadcasters","ready-to-be-aired interviews and scripts, radio-based distance learning","climate change mitigation and adaptation","climate-smart agriculture"],"sieverID":"0a9db204-dece-40a6-8781-12f7173d7729","content":"Even at this Digital Age, the old-fashioned radio is still the most pervasive medium of mass communication, especially in the grassroots. Radio substantially contributes to behavior change by raising the level of awareness and understanding of rural people on burning issues like climate change. In the Philippines, there are about 659 radio stations, whose listenership is predominantly in the rural areas where more than two million farmers reside. Radio has advantages over the other mass media like television and newspapers in terms of being handy, portable and cheap. With the Internet, radio now has converged with television and has a global reach. Hence, aside from being effective information, education and entertainment medium, radio is a powerful vehicle for social mobilization towards climate change mitigation and adaptation in the grassroots. Along with this, the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security in Southeast Asia (CCAFS SEA) partnered with the Philippine Federation of Rural Broadcasters (PFRB) in piloting a rural radio campaign dubbed as 'Climate Change i-Broadkas Mo' in strategic regions of the Philippines in 2015 to 2016. The radio campaign provided PFRB affiliated broadcasters with scripts and ready-to-be-aired (RTBA) interviews on climate-smart agriculture. The scripts were meant to be read by participating rural broadcasters as a short material or segment within their program and used as filler or insert between segments and/or between musical pieces. Taking off from the pilot campaign, the second phase of Climate Change i-Brodkas Mo! kicked off in mid -2018 by PFRB in partnership with CCAFS SEA and DA Regional Field Offices (DA RFOs). The 2018 campaign is essentially an intensified follow up and expansion of the pilot campaign in 2015 to 2016 and will wind up towards the end of 2019.The project trained 268 rural broadcasters and produced 276 ready-to-be-aired scripts, 285 canned interviews, 10 radio spots and two jingles in five different dialects in the Philippines.These were sent to more than 200 PFRB members and their network of community radio practitioners all over the Philippines with a combined listenership of two million. The materials are timeless, so these can be used continuously beyond the project. Aside from reaching a critical mass of farmers, the project enhanced the capacities of rural broadcasters on climate change reporting and created a demand for radio-based distance learning in Northern Philippines.The objectives of the project are as follows:1. Conduct a series of seminar-workshops on climate change, agriculture and food security for rural broadcasters and get them engaged in the campaign.2. Produce and distribute ready-to-be-aired broadcast materials, spots, and jingles in major Philippine dialects.3. Heighten awareness and understanding and mobilize rural communities about climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and food security.The following steps were pursued in implementing the project:1. Organized a series of two-day seminar-workshops on climate change, agriculture and food security for rural broadcasters in Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao to familiarize them on the issues and science of climate change and in promoting climate-smart agriculture.2. Prepared short ready-to-be-aired (RTBA) scripts in five dialects supplied to participating rural broadcasters. Script length varied from two to four minutes, short enough to be easily read by rural broadcasters in their respective programs.3. Prepared 5 -10-minute canned interviews, 10 radio spots and two jingles in major dialects.4. Sent the foregoing RTBA materials electronically on a weekly basis where possible.Hard copies (packaged in announcers' folders) were also prepared, printed and distributed to rural broadcasters and other interested media personnel.5. Implemented an award/feedback system for broadcasters participating in the campaign. The awards were in the form of recognition plaques, certificates, medals and/or field trips. No prize money was given out.To kick off the campaign, a series of seminar-workshops to familiarize rural broadcasters on climate change, agriculture and food security were conducted by PFRB, DA and CCAFS SEA.These took place from October to November 2015 in Luzon (Muñoz, Nueva Ecija), Visayas (Kalibo, Aklan), and Mindanao (Koronadal City, South Cotabato).Similar to Phase 1, the second phase of the campaign started with a series of broadcast consultation cum production workshops for Mindanao (Cagayan de Oro; 13-14 September 2018);Visayas (Baybay, Leyte; 27-28 September 2018) and Luzon (Echague, Isabela; 11-12 October 2018).These workshops were attended by about 268 rural broadcasters (Table 01) for them to (1) appreciate and understand climate change, its meaning, including its concrete manifestations and science innovations for its mitigation and adaptation in the context of agriculture and food On the other hand, PFRB officials shared various techniques on how to broadcast climate change and CSA. They also assisted participants on how to identify specific topics for broadcasting. The workshops then served as a platform were broadcasters could apply the lessons that they learned from the discussions.In the workshops, participants were divided into smaller groups to brainstorm topics for the prototype production. The group composition was diverse to ensure that ideas would come from various sectors. They were guided by the discussions of resource persons from the academe, local government units (LGUs), CCAFS SEA, and PFRB.The small groups then recorded prototype RTBAs either through their phones or through radio stations. While playing the materials, they also flashed the scripts on screen. This enabled the PFRB, CCAFS SEA, and the rest of the participants to critique the materials and provide suggestions for improvement. After critiquing by resource persons, the prototypes were collected and improved by PFRB which were eventually turned into ready-to-be-aired materials. 3. Ten (10) dramatized radio spots in Tagalog on the same subject matter as in #1.4. Two (2) musical jingles (Tagalog and Ilocano) that carry the central message of climate change resilience and readiness.On the whole, 276 ready-to-be-aired interviews, 285 scripts, 10 radio spots and two jingles were produced by the project in five major dialects in the Philippines (Table 02). These were sent to 152 PFRB members (Appendix The RTBA materials were read by participating rural broadcasters as short segments within their programs. The materials were also used as filler or as inserts between segments and/or between musical pieces. Each script was written in flowing easy-to-read and easy-to-understand language.The pieces were purposefully short so as not to be intrusive in the announcer's program and not to disrupt flow of discussion.All scripts were packaged in an announcer's folder together. As a matter of practice, the scripts and canned interviews were aired repeatedly in every program of PFRB members. For DZMM TeleRadyo (radio/TV) and a couple of other TV shows by PFRB members, the interviews were fitted with pictures and videos. All the Tagalog interviews were featured as articles in Kaunlaran magazine.Most PFRB broadcasters are also members of the Philippine Agricultural Journalists, Inc. (PAJ)and the Philippine Science Journalists, Inc., hence, these organizations worked closely in the campaign through joint participation in the broadcast seminar-workshops.For both Phases, below is the reward and incentive scheme:1. Instead of airtime fee, incentives were given to participating broadcasters on the basis of feedback returns, reports, and initiatives to localize and expand discussion, as well as monitoring reports; Certificates were also given.2. Twenty (20) plaques of appreciation to outstanding participants.3. Five ( 5) trophies (plaques) to most deserving participants.4. Field trip to climate smart projects and communities for selected participants.5. Special prizes to members who have conducted school-on-the-air out of the RTBA materials.6. Incentives to feed backing listeners in terms of field trip.7. Radio receiver sets, mobile phones and other rewards were given to participating broadcasters.Insights on the broadcast seminar-workshops 1. On the whole, the seminar-workshops enhanced the knowledge and understanding of rural broadcasters in reporting on climate change and CSA. Participants expressed their appreciation to the climate-related discussions as they gave them the confidence to broadcast scientific knowledge. Moreover, their skills as mass media practitioners were further improved as they learned new broadcasting techniques in the context of climate change, agriculture and food security.stakeholders such as those from the academe, local government units, research organizations, and international partners. Their linkage with these stakeholders is crucial to boost their credibility and increase their influence over their listeners. On the other hand, the aforementioned stakeholders were linked with partners (i.e., the broadcasters) that could multiply their reach in the grassroots.Communication and collaboration catalyzed by rural radio can mobilize stakeholders to take action, especially in the grassroots.The production of short RTBA materials and one-page scripts significantly enhanced the efficiency and effectivity of broadcasters for the following reasons:1. Ease of use -rural broadcasters lack time and resources to prepare interviews with subject matter experts who are mostly based in urban centers and far away research institutions.2. Credibility -Since interview materials are from experts themselves, there is no question about validity and accuracy of information.Cost efficiency-the RTBAs can easily be accommodated as a regular segment in running a popular show; hence, airing of these materials need not be negotiated with managers of commercial stations who demand high commercial fees.1. The project complemented and supplemented extension workers who were not be able to reach distant places. In the absence of extension workers, vital information on climate change and CSA were passed on by rural broadcasters to farmers in far flung areas through the RTBA interviews with subject matter specialists and scripts aired by broadcasters.2. The project linked rural people with other stakeholders to be involved in the development process by providing opportunities for interaction among farmer-listeners and other stakeholders (e.g. extension workers and researchers) though the rural broadcasters. Rural radio enables communities to articulate their experiences and critically examine issues and concerns affecting their livelihood. These issues and concerns can be discussed through radio and immediate feedback can be obtained for relevant authorities to take action.3. The project demystified the jargon of climate science by using a language that ordinary people can understand. Broadcasts were targeted to specific communities using language and content of the RTBA materials were localized. Since radio transcends literacy barriers, broadcast messages were understood even by unschooled listeners.In The impact of climate change innovations needs a critical mass for their widescale application on the ground. In this regard, the campaign was able to reach a critical mass of end users in the grassroots with the broadcast materials being aired on at least 63 radio stations nationwide.National and powerful stations were (and are still) among the outlets where the materials were aired -DZMM TeleRadyo, Radio ng Bayan, and DXAS, for example. Each of these stations have about 50,000 -700,000 listeners a day. Regional and community stations also participated. This is important since the focus of rural broadcasters is remote farming communities. If we compute an average of 20,000 listeners for the rest of the stations where the CCAFS-PFRB materials were aired, we would have reached at least 2,000,000 listeners.As an offshoot of the pilot radio campaign, a radio-based distance learning project has been initiated by the Philippine Department of Agriculture Regional Office "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2392640364.json b/main/part_2/2392640364.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1fbd49683e2e3107a0c93c8ac6fb165d282a2511 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2392640364.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6c850f75f33411a5e4a51ed13654c797","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/bedd5813-f8bc-4240-8187-157a6effc239/retrieve","id":"-414376522"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8e73facc-7438-4227-8f45-83548d0adefc","content":"The dramatic return on CIP's investment in sweetpotato improvement and virus control has set the stage for this crop to contribute more than ever to food security and equitable economic development in marginal areas across the developing world. This nutritious food crop, grown mostly by low-income farmers, contributes to the diet and income of some 600 million people in the developing world, which accounts for 98 percent of the crop's global production. Not only does sweetpotato provide a staple food for the poor, but it is also rapidly becoming an important source of raw material for animal feeds, starch, and starch-derived industrial products.Another dividend for farmers who use improved sweetpotato varieties is that it is proving to be an extremely effective approach to boosting food production without the excessive use of chemical inputs. As a result, researchers are helping to ensure that this valuable crop fulfills its enormous potential in combating food shortage, malnutrition, and poverty. Genetic improvement has led to the release of 21 sweetpotato varieties in targeted countries since the project started in 1996. In one example of the success of CIP's approach to improving sweetpotato, the application of virus cleanup techniques undertaken in two provinces in China in 1998 has generated net benefits of US$550 million.This project aims at improving human health and income generation through the development and adoption of new sweetpotato varieties with enhanced postharvest characteristics, and the application of virus cleanup techniques for production of healthy planting material in low-input subsistence farming systems.OUTPUT. CIP researchers will utilize the diverse reservoir of sweetpotato genetic materials held at CIP's state-of-the-art genebank in order to generate:• enhanced sweetpotatoes with desirable quality attributes for table use, feed, processing, or resistance/tolerance to major biotic and abiotic stresses, readily accessible by national agricultural research system (NARS) breeders whose health-and lives-are threatened by lack of vitamin A. Vitamin A deficiency is one of Africa's leading causes of early childhood death and is a major risk factor for pregnant and lactating women.With this in mind CIP, together with about 40 international and local partners, has launched a project known as VITAA (Vitamin A for Africa) that aims to replace the white-fleshed sweetpotatoes presently grown by farmers in Africa with orangefleshed, beta-carotene-rich sweetpotatoes.Beta-carotene is used by the human body to produce vitamin A. The idea behind VITAA is that the new sweetpotatoes, \"hand-picked\" for traits acceptable to African palates (i.e. high dry matter content and less sweet flavor) and for their good yields and high beta-carotene content, will provide farmers and consumers numerous nutritional and economic benefits.This innovative project is believed to be the first food-based approach to be used in the fight against vitamin A deficiency. Studies suggest that 50 million African women and children could benefit from the new orange-fleshed varieties.For more information, please contact Dapeng Zhang, CIP Project 5 Leader, Apartado 1558, Lima 12, Peru, or at d.zhang@cgiar.org. Information and other contact points are also available on our website: www.cipotato.orgThe International Potato Center (CIP) seeks to reduce poverty and achieve food security on a sustained basis in developing countries through scientific research and related activities on potato, sweetpotato and other root and tuber crops, and on the improved management of natural resources in the Andes and other mountain areas www.cipotato.org CIP is one of 16 food and environmental research organizations known as the Future Harvest Centers. The centers, located around the world, conduct research in partnership with farmers, scientists, and policymakers to help alleviate poverty and increase food security while protecting the natural resource base. The Future Harvest Centers are principally funded through the 58 countries, private foundations, and regional and international organizations that make up the "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2396799142.json b/main/part_2/2396799142.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38b20ec36800909ae22151914fc9ea83803a9df6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2396799142.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5a1e914001eee1045687fa974d59dc44","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/761a33b0-f17a-453e-afdc-ce7fd90c8983/retrieve","id":"2028785939"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b0f82866-cefb-4fda-a9d9-9d07c775e438","content":"Adoption of cultivated forage production in Ethiopia is still low. Some of the reasons:• Poor awareness of livestock producers in forage production• Traditional and subsistence livestock production (Not market oriented)• Shortage of arable land• Poor extension systems• Lack of forage seeds and planting materialsLearning Objectives• Refresher topics on forage seed production and challenges in Ethiopia focusing in the highland areas• Commercial seed production and forage seed marketing situations in Ethiopia• How forage seed commercialization could be improved What are the major technical challenges and opportunities in forage seed production in Ethiopia.• What are the major skills and production practices need to be well addressed Why forage seed supply is very low in Ethiopia?• There are no adequate number of commercial forage seed producers• Lack of technical skills• Most forage crops, especially perennial grasses and legumes are low seed producers• High production costs• Poor forage seed marketing systems• The willingness to pay for forage seeds by farmers is not encouraging Forage Seed Production systems in EthiopiaSeed growers are organized in a form of large enterprise (regional enterprises like Oromia seed enterprise, Amhara seed enterprise, etc.)Private firms emerging around forage seed production and trading businesses in Ethiopia.Some of these firms have their own pieces of land or use outreach farmers to produce forage seeds and need to be provided with technical training and quality basic seeds.Forage Seed Production ApproachesFarmers' cooperatives and unions established for the production and supply of forage seeds aside with other activitiesSome forage seeds require less technical skills and can be produced at individual farm level. For example, forages like lablab, cowpea, oats, vetch, etc Forage Seed Production ApproachesThis is where community structures like farmers training centers (FTCs) are used to grow and disseminate forage seeds. In this approach, FTCs which were basically established at each kebele for practical training and demonstration purposes can be used to grow forage seedsResearch centers are mandated with collecting and maintaining forage genetic materials from various sources. They also multiply planting materials in limited quantities for dissemination to researchers, seed growers and extension work on not-for-profit basis. (breeder and pre basic seeds) 1) Species -which species are widely produced Seed (kg ha Annuals and perennial forage crops -where should the focus need to be in commercial seed production?• Both annual and perennial forages have there on niche in herbage production and utilization• In terms of ease of forage seed production, they have clear difference.• Requires special seed production skills  Seed demand is increasing due to the need for quality feed production Generally, forage seed systems in Ethiopia is underdevelopedWho are the major forage seed suppliers in Ethiopia ?• Only few private commercial forage seed producers in the country• Efforts has been going on to identify the challenges and support these producers• Most of these private producers produce few and selected forage species Takeaway messages• Feed production based on cultivated forages need to be promoted to create demand for forage seeds• Technical skill and experience is crucial to produce quality forage seeds• Availability of forage seeds at reasonable prices are essential to improve adoption of cultivated forages• The government and development actors need to support in establishing sustainable forage seed system in Ethiopia• Specialization in forage seed business is important to ensure quality seed supply"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2404763449.json b/main/part_2/2404763449.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..099dd9da3da8c2787e232bcb39a9fe56dbd19488 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2404763449.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"10324b1336fea5ae216593c5e437ef7a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5af6cf01-49f7-4d52-a8a7-9ad81b234a03/retrieve","id":"-1951078825"},"keywords":["CRISPR/Cas system","base editing","prime editing","epigenome editing","crop improvement"],"sieverID":"322a970c-7766-4e09-90aa-2ac7b8e559a5","content":"CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) system was initially discovered as an underlying mechanism for conferring adaptive immunity to bacteria and archaea against viruses. Over the past decade, this has been repurposed as a genome-editing tool. Numerous gene editing-based crop improvement technologies involving CRISPR/Cas platforms individually or in combination with next-generation sequencing methods have been developed that have revolutionized plant genome-editing methodologies. Initially, CRISPR/Cas nucleases replaced the earlier used sequence-specific nucleases (SSNs), such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), to address the problem of associated offtargets. The adaptation of this platform led to the development of concepts such as epigenome editing, base editing, and prime editing. Epigenome editing employed epi-effectors to manipulate chromatin structure, while base editing uses base editors to engineer precise changes for trait improvement. Newer technologies such as prime editing have now been developed as a \"search-and-replace\" tool to engineer all possible singlebase changes. Owing to the availability of these, the field of genome editing has evolved rapidly to develop crop plants with improved traits. In this review, we present the evolution of the CRISPR/Cas system into new-age methods of genome engineering across various plant species and the impact they have had on tweaking plant genomes and associated outcomes on crop improvement initiatives.Over the past decade, the gene-editing platforms have shown tremendous evolution to accommodate the dual concerns of biosafety of edited crops and the efficiency of the platform used. Efficient and rapid genomic sequencing platforms have facilitated a better understanding of plant genomes, particularly when used in conjunction with genome editing (GE). Restructuring genomes via introduction of heritable genomic changes for expressing desirable quality traits in crops has been the focus of research for decades. The primitive methods of genome restructuring involved the use of genotoxic agents to introduce random double-stranded breaks (DSB) that were subsequently repaired by inherent nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways resulting in random mutations (Puchta, 2005). After decades of usage of these random mutations generating tools, GE platforms have gone through many phases of improvement over the years. For example, the discovery of sequence-specific nucleases (SSNs) such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) helped to engineer the genome at intended loci by mediating the cleavage of dsDNA. The use of these nucleases induced the native NHEJ pathway for DNA repair (Salomon and Puchta, 1998). This method of GE, however, is both cost-and laborintensive as it requires the development of sequence-specific nucleases/proteins. In addition, GE using these nucleases was inefficient as unintended off-target edits were introduced by the induction of the error-prone NHEJ repair pathway.Given the obvious limitations of ZFNs and TALENs, the vacuum was soon filled with the discovery of CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) nucleases. In prokaryotes, the CRISPR/Cas system exists as a means of endogenous small RNA-based adaptive defense mechanism that protects the host bacterial cell via sequencespecific recognition and targeted cleavage of viral DNA (Jinek et al., 2012). With an approximate length of 32 bp, the length of CRISPR repeat sequences varies between 21 and 47 bp across prokaryotes. Every CRISPR repeat sequence harbors a unique sequence that is specific to the bacterial species processing it and has, therefore, been conserved over the course of evolution (Karginov and Hanon 2010). CRISPR was first discovered by a Japanese group in 1987 while studying the iap gene from the E. coli genome (Ishino et al., 1987). They identified CRISPR as homologous repeated sequences of only a few nucleotides interspersed by spacer sequences. Following this, CRISPRs were reported from the archaeal genome, Haloferax mediterranei (Mojica et al., 1993). However, the prodigious potential of the CRISPR/Cas9 as a GE platform was discovered just a decade ago (Jinek et al., 2012). To employ this tool, a customized small guide RNA (gRNA) is designed to identify the intended target and guide the associated Cas9 protein to introduce DSBs in the target genomic DNA. Indels are introduced at the target site as the repair pathway via NHEJ is triggered. Over the course of evolution of the platform, new variants of Cas proteins have been mobilized to increase the efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated GE.During the past decade, the term \"CRISPR/Cas\" has evolved into a synonym for GE following which off-targeting instances with the use of CRISPR/Cas systems have reduced manifold (Modrzejewski et al., 2020). However, the goal of achieving \"no off-target\" remains elusive. In addition, with the involvement of the NHEJ repair pathway, the efficiency of this platform has always been disputable. In the third phase of the evolution of GE platforms, the CRISPR/Cas platform evolved to target the epigenome of an organism which was termed epigenome editing (Konermann et al., 2013). In epigenome editing, chromatin modification at specific genomic loci involves the use of epi-effectors that are comprised of DNA recognition domains (ZFNs, TALENs, or CRISPR/Cas system) and catalytic domains from a chromatin-modifying enzyme. Epigenome editing has been slated to have promising results in numerous basic sciences to decipher functions of chromatin structure and associated modification in phenotypes.In the fourth phase, the CRISPR/Cas system evolved into a new methodology called base editing, wherein RNA-guided endonucleases were employed to engineer all four possible transitions with increased precision (Komor et al., 2016). One of the major challenges that all of the aforesaid techniques still face is to simultaneously engineer the altered DNA at the intended target sites. These concerns were addressed with the introduction of prime editing, marking the fifth phase in the evolution of GE platforms. Prime editing is largely described as a \"search-and-replace\" technology that edits the intended genomic loci without generating DSBs (Anzalone et al., 2019). This platform efficiently addresses the concerns of frameshift mutations that arise with the introduction of indels, further reducing off-target mutations. In addition, prime editing can introduce all 12 possible nucleotide substitutions (including transversions and transitions) (Anzalone et al., 2019).The availability of all new-age GE strategies has not stolen the thunder of the CRISPR/Cas platform owing to the ease of its use and relevance to editing genes in numerous crop plants. However, it is only a matter of time before rapidly changing GE methods will replace present-day CRISPR/Cas systems with more elegant and efficient platforms. With every refinement of the platform, we are getting only closer to generating precise introduced mutations/deletions with reduced off-target effects. In the present review, we evaluate the evolution of GE platforms, such as CRISPR/Cas, epigenome editing, base editing, and prime editing over the last decade to highlight the paradigm shift in our understanding of GE strategies and the relevance of these platforms in present-day agriculture. pathway or the NHEJ-DNA repair pathway. In the first phase of developing GE platforms, SSNs such as ZFNs and TALENs were employed to introduce heritable genomic changes. ZFNs are chimeric enzymes that work as a dimer. Each monomer has 3-5 zinc-finger repeats along with a FokI cleavage domain. Each of the zinc fingers is capable of recognizing 3 bp of genomic DNA. Therefore, a ZFN dimer can effectively identify an 18-30 bp DNA with a gap of 5-7 bp (Kim et al., 2007). In plants, the first study involving ZFNs was reported in Arabidopsis, wherein heat shock was found to augment ZFN expression. At least 10% of the transgenics obtained displayed the mutations induced by ZFNs in future generations (Lloyd et al., 2005). In maize, ZFNs were employed to introduce a DSB at ipk1, and following this, a herbicide tolerance gene was inserted that resulted in transgenics showing tolerance to herbicide (Shukla et al., 2009). One of the major disadvantages of ZFNs is that the zinc fingers could overlap and are largely dependent on the sequence context around them and the intended DNA segment. Therefore, employing ZFNs becomes both labor-and costintensive as for every edit, the zinc-finger array is designed, and the sites available for the edits are limited (Boch and Bonas 2010). Although many studies have reported ZFNs to edit genes, its use as a tool of choice for GE now stands outdated. Another type of nucleases, TALENs, with DNA binding domains, was also employed to engineer genomic changes (Boch and Bonas 2010). Thirty-four tandem repeats are typically present in the DNA binding domain along with repeat-variable di-residue (RVD) comprised of two amino acids at positions 12 and 13, providing the TALENs with the ability to identify the intended target DNA sequence (Cong et al., 2012;Streubel et al., 2012). Like ZFNs, TALENs also introduce DSBs in the intended genomic DNA sequences, completely disrupting the gene and (or) introducing mutations. In comparison to ZFNs, TALENs can be designed for more target sites in the genomic DNA (Boch and Bonas 2010). In rice, TALENs were used to mutate the OsSWEET gene to develop transgenic resistance to blight (Li et al., 2012). Similarly, in wheat, transgenic with increased resistance to powdery mildew was developed by employing TALENs induced mutations (Wang et al., 2014). In cabbage, early flowering plants were obtained by employing TALENs (Sun et al., 2013). Like ZFNs, using TALENs is cost-and labor-intensive with limited success, and therefore, their use has now been largely suspended for introducing genomic changes.3 Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas system-mediated genetic modificationThe CRISPR/Cas systems represent the second phase of evolution in the development of GE platforms. CRISPR/Cas systems are sequence-specific and, therefore, mediate targeted DNA cleavage with increased efficiency. Three major steps are involved in CRISPR/Cas mechanism. The first step is adaptation, wherein a small sequence from the mobile genetic elements (MGEs) is harbored into the host CRISPR resulting in a novel spacer sequence. This adaptive event helps the host bacterial cell evade the attack from the same virus in the future (Barrangou et al., 2007). The selection of the target sequence to be incorporated into the CRISPR array is sequence-specific. In type I, II, and V CRISPR/Cas systems, a small sequence, termed the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM), is found adjacent to the protospacer that is to be incorporated into the CRISPR array. Therefore, PAM is cardinal to both acquiring the protospacer and bringing about the subsequent interference (Datsenko et al., 2012;Zetsche et al., 2015;Fonfara et al., 2016). Although the acquisition mechanism of spacers is not yet fully deciphered, in almost all CRISPR/Cas systems, Cas1 and Cas2 proteins have been found to maneuver the acquisition of the spacer into the CRISPR array (Makarova et al., 2015;Shmakov et al., 2015). Both these proteins are found to be necessary for the acquisition of the spacer (Datsenko et al., 2012). The two proteins form a hetero-hexameric protein complex (Cas1-Cas2), which is central to both excision and incorporation of the protospacer DNA into the CRISPR array (Nuñez et al., 2014). Barring a few exceptions, invariably the spacers are chronologically added to the array (Shmakov et al., 2015). Cas1-Cas2 protein complex is central to protospacer acquisition across most type 1 and type II CRISPR/Cas systems. Therefore, this mode of spacer acquisition stands most well deciphered so far. In the second step, the CRISPR array is transcribed and processed. In addition, the associated Cas genes are also transcribed into crRNAs. This step is subtype-specific, and therefore, subtype-specific enzymes are employed. However, broadly across all CRISPR/ Cas systems, the CRISPR array is first transcribed into a precursor crRNA (pre-crRNA). Different Cas proteins and ribonucleases cleave and process this in various types of CRISPR/Cas systems to yield a mature crRNA. In the third step, following infection, the mature crRNAs mediate subtypespecific machinery driven mostly via Cas proteins to ensure effective cleavage of the MGE. The mechanism of different Cas proteins employed in various CRISPR/Cas systems has been well documented in many studies (Liu L et al., 2020;Talakayala et al., 2022;Wada et al., 2022).The classification of the CRISPR/Cas systems identified so far is primarily based on the presence of the effector Cas proteins that cleave the invading foreign nucleic acids. The primary classification divides these systems into two classes: Class 1 and Class 2. Class 1 CRISPR/Cas systems employ a multi-protein complex, and Class 2 CRISPR/Cas systems recruit a single effector protein. Further, classification of Class 1 and Class 2 CRISPR/Cas systems into subtypes (I through VI) is dependent on their mechanism of action. The effector module of the CRISPR/Cas system is divided into three stages: the adaptation stage, the expression and processing stage, and the interference stage. In class 1 CRISPR/Cas systems (with types I, III, and IV), type I and type III systems employ a multi-protein complex called the Cascade complex along with Cas3 nucleasehelicase and the Cmr complex for type I, type III-A, and type IIIB CRISPR/Cas systems, respectively (Koonin and Makarova, 2019;Chaudhuri et al., 2022). However, class 2 CRISPR/Cas systems (with types II, V, and VI) employ only one effector protein. In type II and type V CRISPR/Cas systems, the expression and processing of the crRNA are regulated by a single protein such as Cas9 and Cpf1, respectively (Makarova et al., 2015;Amitai and Sorek, 2016). Type VI systems have been recently discovered and are the only CRISPR/Cas systems to target RNA specifically (Chaudhuri et al., 2022). In Class 1 CRISPR Cas systems, type 1 and type III are more prevalent than type IV in diverse bacterial and archaeal populations. However, type II of the Class 2 CRISPR/Cas system is found across all bacterial species (Koonin and Makarova, 2019). Depending on their function, Cas proteins can be primarily classified into four categories; recombinases/nucleases that aid the acquisition of spacers, ribonucleases that regulate the processing of crRNAs, scanning complexes like the crRNP complex, and nucleases that mediate the cleavage of the intended target sequences (Van Der Oost et al., 2014).Class 1 CRISPR systems, types I and III, bear structural similarities suggesting evolution via a common ancestor (Chaudhuri et al., 2022). In addition, they employ Cas9 endonuclease to process crRNA. Type I CRISPR/Cas systems are further divided into six subtypes, types I-A, I-B, I-C, I-D, I-E, and I-F, depending on the distinct PAMs that the subunits require to regulate recognition and acquisition. The type III systems are divided into four subtypes, type III-A, III-B, III-C, and III-D, based on variation in adaptation, recognition, and interference modules of the effector protein complex. Chaudhuri et al. (2022) discussed the further classification of type I and type III into subtypes at length. Class 2 CRISPR/Cas system is divided into three types, types II, V, and VI. Out of these, the type II system is the most dissected and well-understood system so far (Koonin and Makarova, 2019;Chaudhuri et al., 2022). This system employs the Cas9 endonuclease as the effector. Type V system uses a single effector protein, Cas12. However, Cas12 has six subtypes, types V-A, V-B, V-C, V-D, V-E, and V-U, that identify distinct PAM sequences (Chaudhuri et al., 2022). Owing to obvious advantages such as smaller size, no dependency on tracr for target recognition, and asymmetric cleavage sites, Cas12 has now been actively replacing the Cas9 system for GE in many animal and plant species. Type VI systems are characterized by the presence of higher eukaryotes and prokaryotes nucleotide-binding (HEPN) domains with RNase activity (Koonin and Makarova, 2019;Chaudhuri et al., 2022). Cas13a was the first protein identified for type VI CRISPR/Cas systems (Chaudhuri et al., 2022). The evolution of type VI-B, such as Cas13b, is thought to have occurred from transmembrane systems, making them unique from type VI systems into a new subtype type VI-B (Chaudhuri et al., 2022). Type VI systems only target RNAs, thus thought to have lower instances of off-targeting and, in turn, do not harm the host cell much. The extensive diversity of the CRISPR/Cas system, as evident by their classification, reflects the evolution of the CRISPR/Cas-based defense mechanism in both archaea and bacteria. In addition, this diversity of CRISPR/ Cas systems presents researchers with varied tools of GE to introduce precise changes with efficacy. Table 1 summarizes the classification of the CRISPR/Cas systems identified so far.5 Repurposing native clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 for the development of genome-editing platforms Class II CRISPR/Cas systems were found to be most suitable for development into a tool for genetic manipulation owing to the simplicity of their mechanism of action (Makarova et al., 2015). Type II CRISPR/Cas systems employ Cas9 protein that relies only on an RNA complex of crRNA:tracrRNA that is easy to engineer into a single guide DNA (gDNA) molecule (Jinek et al., 2012). These systems employ only two components: Cas9, a DNA endonuclease, and a customizable gRNA. A single gRNA is sufficient to direct the cleavage of the intended sequences. The gRNA molecules are customized to contain a sequence that Cas9 recognizes and a target sequence that guides the complex to the intended locus (Anders et al., 2014). To identify the intended target site, the Cas9-sgRNA complex scans the targeted DNA for a PAM site, following this 12 bases (seed region) of gRNAs proximal to PAM pair with the intended target sequence (Semenova et al., 2011). Mismatches in the seed region have been found to affect the activity of Cas9 adversely. However, mismatches in the 5' PAM distal region are well-tolerated without affecting Cas9 nuclease activity (Liu et al., 2016). Catalytic domains of Cas9, HNH, and RuvC invariably result in a DSB in the DNA. Following this, DSB repair is initiated that is mediated either by homology direct repair (HDR) or the NHEJ pathway. The latter does not require a template for DNA repair and hence is error-prone. NHEJ is the active DNA repair mechanism in nature wherein Cas9-induced DSBs are repaired (Moore and Haber 1996). NHEJ can, therefore, lead to small insertions or deletions that could yield a host of mutations (Calvache et al., 2022;Wada et al., 2022). Such mutations are beneficial while knocking out a targeted gene using CRISPR/Cas9 systems. However, being random and unpredictable makes this mode of DNA repair unsuitable for precise editing of intended genes. To this effect, HDR is a more obvious choice of DSB repair mechanism for incorporation of desired sequences following cleavage by Cas9. In plants, GE HDR relies on a DNA template along with the gDNA and Cas9 for a successful DSB repair (Calvache et al., 2022;Wada et al., 2022). In plants, through genetic engineering, many outstanding repairs have been achieved via HDR, leading to gene replacement, DNA correction, and targeted knockouts. Figure 1 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of the adaptation to the CRISPR/ Cas9 system in plants for gene editing.6 Applications of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 system as a powerful tool in crop improvement Present-day agriculture faces serious threats from both abiotic and biotic stresses. Rapidly changing climate and exponentially growing world population increase the pressure of ensuring food security for both present and future generations. To mitigate agricultural losses and to aid crops in realizing their full potential, the only sustainable solution is to develop climateresilient crops. Since its discovery in 2012 as a potential tool for genetic engineering, CRISPR/Cas9 system and its derivatives have rapidly replaced genome engineering methods in crop improvement programs across the globe. In model crops such as maize, a CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knocking and replacement in the liguleless-1 (LIG1) was reported (Svitashev et al., 2016). Similarly, in wheat, CRISPR/Cas9 GE system was employed to introduce targeted mutations in two wheat genes, TaLox2 and TaUbiL1. This study also validated the efficiency of using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in combination with microspore technology in plants for both trait improvement and discovery (Bhowmik et al., 2018). In tomato, complete expression of the susceptibility gene SlyPMR4 was knocked down to generate tomato plants with resistance against powdery mildew (Martínez et al., 2020). CRISPR/Cas9-based GE systems are now employed to improve multigenic traits such as biotic and abiotic stresses in many crops. Table 2 summarizes studies wherein CRISPR/Cas has been used successfully for trait manipulation in crop plants. Figure 2 depicts schematic representation of the domains of crop sciences wherein CRISPR/Cas platforms have largely contributed.One of the most important applications of CRISPR/Cas9 platforms across the globe has been to engineer disease resistance in crop plants. Plant pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, nematodes, insects, and fungi are the most potent biotic stress factors that impact the yield potential of crops across the globe. Continuously evolving new strains of lethal pests make the battle against the pathogens even more complicated and daunting (Razzaq et al., 2019). Therefore, to protect and aid crops, methodologies routed in concepts of genome engineering have been successfully developed (Jaganathan et al., 2018). Peng et al. (2017) reported the development of varieties of Citrus sinensis (Wanjincheng orange) with increased resistance to Xanthomonas citri, which is responsible for the citrus canker disease in oranges. In this study, the expression of the gene, CsLOB1, which is responsible for the development of the disease, was disrupted using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Two alleles (cslob1g and cslob1) exist for the gene CsLOB1. The promoter region of both these alleles inhibits an effector binding site (EBE) that is recognized by the main effector PthA4 of Xcc to drive the expression of cslob1 and results in the development of the disease. Five Type Effector module Class Type Effector module independent constructs pCas9/CsLOB1sgRNA were employed to modify the effector binding site EBE in the promoter region of CsLOB1 alleles. Homologous mutants wherein the EBE was completely disrupted were obtained, displaying no disease development following infection with Xanthomonas citri (Peng et al., 2017). In rice, an ethylene-responsive gene OsERF922 was knocked out using the CRISPR/Cas9 tool, which led to a marked reduction in the size and number of the blast lesions. This work led to the development of a rice cultivar with increased resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae (Wang et al., 2016). In another study, blight-resistant plants were produced using CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated targeted mutagenesis of the SWEET13 gene (Zhou et al., 2015). Management of diseases in crop plants is dominated by the frequent use of insecticides to curb yield losses. The development of crops resistant to viruses is, therefore, an efficient strategy to yield a stable yet economically viable alternative (Wang W et al., 2021). To this effect, inducing deletions and introducing point mutations in the genes using the CRISPR/Cas9 system is one of the most organic adaptations of the platform. The eukaryotic translation initiation factor genes such as eIF4E and eIF4G are an absolute requirement for the translation of RNA viruses (Shopan et al., 2020). Therefore, CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been employed in numerous plant species to engineer induced mutations in these genes. In Arabidopsis, point mutations in eIF(iso)4E gene were found to impart complete resistance against the turnip mosaic virus (Pyott et al., 2016). Likewise, in cucumber, eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF(iso)4E was engineered using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to generate heritable homozygous point mutations that conferred resistance to the mutants against zucchini yellow mosaic virus, papaya ringspot mosaic virus-W, and vein yellowing virus (Chandrasekaran et al., 2016). In Nicotiana benthamiana, sgRNA/Cas9-mediated broad-spectrum immunity was Semi-dwarf male plants Zhang C et al. ( 2020 et al., 2016). In rice, the CRISPR/ Cas9 system was used to generate eIF4G alleles that conferred resistance against the Rice tungro spherical virus (Macovei et al., 2018). Recently, Wang et al. (2021) employed the CRISPR/ Cas9 system to generate novel eIF4G alleles to yield transgenic plants displaying complete resistance to rice black-streaked dwarf virus. Engineering these mutations via the traditional backcrossing would have taken years, but using the CRISPR/ Cas9 system expedited the process, and the goal was achieved in just a single generation.The CRISPR/Cas9 system has also been used extensively over the past decade in generating climate-resistant cultivars in various crop species such as cotton, maize, rice, wheat, potato, soybean, and tomato (Khan et al., 2021;Wang et al., 2021;Rahman et al., 2022). In wheat, two regulatory genes (i.e., TaDREB3 and TaDREB2) were mutated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, which resulted in increased drought tolerance in the mutated plants in comparison to the wild cultivars (Kim et al., 2017). In maize, the ZmARGOS8 gene that negatively regulates ethylene response was studied using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The promoter of this gene was knocked out and replaced with maize GOS2 promoter in 5′-UTR of the target gene. The mutant plants were found to overexpress ARGOS8, which led to a stupendous increase in the yield in comparison to the wild type under drought conditions during the flowering stage without any yield penalty under irrigated environment (Shi et al., 2017). In rice, the CRISPR/Cas9 system was used to knock out gene OsRR2. The homozygous mutants obtained displayed increased tolerance to salinity stress (Zhang et al., 2019). In another study, three genes, OsPIN5b, GS3, and OsMYB30, that determine panicle length, grain size, and cold tolerance, respectively, were simultaneously edited using the CRISPR/Cas9 system (Zeng et al., 2020). T2 generations of the homozygous mutants of these genes displayed increased panicle length, enlarged grain size, and increased cold tolerance, respectively. The CRISPR/Cas9 tool has also been employed for the functional characterization of genes that regulate stress responses in plants. In Arabidopsis, three genes (CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3) have been identified to confer cold acclimatization and tolerance. However, the underlying mechanism remained undeciphered owing to the absence of any loss-of-function lines for these genes. Zhao et al. (2016) generated mutants of the cbf gene family, cbf1, cbf2, and cbf3. They generated cbf single, double, and triple mutants using the CRISPR/Cas9 platform. Interestingly, for the three genes, cbf triple mutants displayed compromised seedling development and reduced salt tolerance. However, both triple and double (cbf2cbf3) mutants displayed increased sensitivity to feeding post-cold acclimatization in comparison to the wild-type control. The cb1/ cb3 double mutants displayed increased resistance, indicating that accumulation of CBF2 is more important than CBF1 and CBF3 in regulating cold acclimation-dependent freezing tolerance. The functional role of many other genes with a potential role in stress tolerance was also investigated in the model system Arabidopsis. The expression of UGT79-B2 and B3 genes was induced by abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, and cold. Overexpression of these genes was found to increase the resistance of the transgenics. However, gene ugt79b2/b3 double mutants generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system were found to be susceptible to abiotic stresses compared to the wildtype control. The overexpression mutants accumulated anthocyanins, but the ugt79b2/b3 double mutants that displayed lower levels of anthocyanins were also found to be more susceptible to stresses than the wild-type control plants. These findings also suggested that an array of anthocyanins impart resistance against abiotic stresses (Li et al., 2017). In rice, knockout mutants for the OsSAPK2 gene were developed for functional characterization of the gene. The mutants showed insensitivity to abscisic acid and increased sensitivity to drought and reactive oxygen species (ROS) during the germination/seedling stage compared to the wild-type control plants. These results suggested the active involvement of the OsSAPK2 gene in mediating drought tolerance through increased stomatal closure (Lou et al., 2017). In another study, OsAnn3, a rice annexin gene, was knocked out in rice using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The survival ratio of T1 mutant lines was found to be adversely affected, indicating that the expression of OsAnn3 was central in imparting cold tolerance in rice (Shen et al., 2017).Drought stress in plants is governed by mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). In tomato, functional characterization of MAPKs was achieved by knocking down SlMAPK3 using the CRISPR/Cas9 system (Wang et al., 2017). The resulting slmapk3 mutants displayed severe wilting symptoms along with lower antioxidant enzymes, increased hydrogen peroxide, and increased membrane damage in comparison to the wild-type control. In another study, a multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 system was used simultaneously to edit five tomato γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) shunt genes (CAT9, SSADH, GABA-TP1, TP2, and TP3). These genes are repressors of GABA metabolism. Hence, targeted mutagenesis of these genes led to a 19-fold increase in the accumulation of GABA in fruits and leaves (Li R et al., 2017).The multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 system has proven to be beneficial in improving yield substantially in various cereal crops. In rice, four genes [i.e., Grain Size 3 (GS3), Ideal Plant Architecture 1 (IPA1), Grain Number 1a (Gn1a), and DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE (DEP1)] were edited using the multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 technique. The mutant plants displayed marked improvement in all the aforesaid traits and resulted in better and improved yields concerning tiller number and grain yield (Li et al., 2016). Similarly, multiplex editing using the CRISPR/ Cas9 system of four genes, that is, GS3, Grain Widths 2, 5, and 6 (GW2, GW5, and GW6), which are negative regulators of grain weight, was investigated in rice. A remarkable improvement was observed in grain weight and size (Xu et al., 2016). The CRISPR/Cas9 system was also employed in rice to knockout three heading date genes (i.e., Hd2, Hd4, and Hd5) (Li et al., 2017). The mutants displayed early heading and higher yield under drought stress conditions. Furthermore, a CRISPR/ Cas9 mediated disruption of the OsSWEET11 gene, known for grain filling and sucrose transportation in rice, led to reduced sucrose concentration and grain weight, which suggested that overexpression of these genes would be beneficial in obtaining a better grain quality (Ma et al., 2017). In wheat, GASR7 was knocked out using the CRISPR/Cas9 tool, and the resulting mutants showed increased kernel weight (Zhang et al., 2016). In tomato, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 methods has also delivered seedless tomatoes (Ueta et al., 2017). In this study, a novel sgRNA/Cas9 was employed, resulting in additional somatic mutation in SlIAA9, a key parthenocarpy gene. The mutation rate was 100%, and there were no off-target mutations. The mutants hence obtained displayed parthenocarpic fruit along with an altered leaf shape.7 Evolution of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 platform for precise gene manipulation CRISPR/Cas9 systems have evolved over the years, and many other approaches have also been routed in this technology. As discussed earlier, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing necessarily introduces DSBs that are subsequently repaired by either NHEJ or HDR mechanisms (Kantor et al., 2020). This results in two major challenges in using CRISPR/Cas9 mechanisms. Firstly, although HDR promises insertion of only sequence-specific DNA, this pathway is synonymous with increased instances of indels and limited efficiency (Song et al., 2017). Secondly, reliance on the HDR mechanism of gene repair restricts gene editing to only dividing cells, adversely affecting the efficiency of this platform in manipulating the disease resistance in plants (Bollen et al., 2018). Many newer technologies that are primarily rooted in the CRISPR/ Cas mechanism overcome some of these limitations and are more precise in achieving genome restructuring in plants. Some of these technologies are detailed in the following sections.In plants, it is well documented that cellular processes are orchestrated via the interplay of several redundant genes. Therefore, editing a single gene from a gene family has not been found to confer the desired phenotype as the redundant genes from the same gene family compensate for the phenotype.In polyploid crop species, this presents an additional layer of complication due to multiple gene dosages or homolog effects. Hence, a more efficient protocol for gene editing is required to aid multiplex gene editing. A single vector system has been used to design many sgRNA cassettes with single or multiple promoters in multiplex gene editing mediated via the CRISPR/Cas9 system (Liu et al., 2017). In Arabidopsis thaliana, two sgRNAs were successfully employed to disrupt two homologs of CHLI (magnesium-chelatase subunit I) to obtain an albino phenotype as both homologs have a function in the photosynthetic mechanism (Mao et al., 2013). In another study in A. thaliana, multiplex gene editing was successfully employed to obtain quadruple mutants displaying dwarf phenotype by deploying three gRNAs (Wang et al., 2017).Further, Čermák et al.(2015) developed a tool kit wherein Csy-type (CRISPR system yersinia) ribonuclease 4 (Csy4) was employed along with tRNA-processing enzymes to simultaneously express multiple gRNAs. Using this method, they expressed 12 gRNAs from a single transcript to target deletions in six genes successfully. These Csy4 and tRNA expression systems have been found almost twice as effective in introducing mutations. The use of this platform has been validated in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), wheat (Triticum aestivum), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and Medicago truncatula (Čermák et al., 2015). Xie et al. (2015) reported an endogenous tRNA-processing mediating gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice. Soon after, Tang et al. (2016) reportedly employed a single POL II promoter to drive the expression of a hammerhead ribozyme and multiple gRNAs. The ribozyme cleaved distinct sgRNAs, and post-transcription Cas9 processed functional Cas9 and gRNAs. In maize, the CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing was successfully used to mutate the homologs that determine genic male sterility (Liu et al., 2022). Triple homozygous mutants were obtained that displayed complete male sterility. Over the course of CRISPR/Cas evolution, multiplex gene editing has emerged as an efficient tool to develop \"multiple genes-knock-out-cultivars.\" Concomitantly, this methodology has enhanced our understanding of gene functions of desired traits that are governed by multiple genes, gene families, or even pleiotropic genes. The technology has also opened vistas for investigating epistatic interactions/associations among genes or gene complexes, especially for complex traits, whose genetic architecture is largely influenced by epistasis.Since the discovery of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene editing, numerous modifications have been incorporated into this technology to address the issue of incompatible off-target sequences due to gRNA mismatches. There have been many attempts to increase the efficiency of Cas9 enzymes and, at the same time, curb any off-target silencing with the use of enzymes such as dead cas9 (dcas9), SpCas9 Nickase (SpCas9n), and FokICas9 (fCas9) (Cong et al., 2013;Guilinger et al., 2014). Other studies have reported the extraction of Cas9 proteins with increased sequence specificity owing to their novel PAM sequences. Nmecas9 was extracted from Neisseria meningitidis specific for PAM sequence 5′-NNNNGATT (Lee et al., 2016). SpCas9 is most commonly used for gene editing with a PAM sequence 5′-NNGRRT (Ran et al., 2015). Modifications have been made for SpCas9 to identify shorter PAM sequences that not only increase the efficiency of the enzyme but also make the delivery of the system easier (Hu et al., 2018). In plants, CRISPR/ Cas9 mediated gene editing has been employed in many plant species such as A. thaliana, rice, citrus, and tobacco (Jiang and Doudna, 2017). Furthermore, St1Cas9 and St3Cas9 extracted from Streptococcus thermophilus have also been employed in CRISPR-mediated gene editing (Jiang and Doudna, 2017). These Cas9 enzymes use different types of tracrRNA and crRNA for identifying PAM sequences (Steinert et al., 2015). Out of all these CRISPR systems employed so far, CRISPR/Cpf1, commonly known as Cas13, is the most popular (Zetsche et al., 2015). Unlike Cas9, Cas13 requires only a sgRNA with 4-5 nucleotide overhangs. In both animals and plants, the Cas13-mediated gene editing has been found to target the desired genes with none or very few off-targets (Endo et al., 2016). Due to their successes, type V CRISPR/Cpf1 has been popular in both plants and animals to engineer gene editing (Zhang et al., 2017). Francisella novicida-derived FnCpf1 was used to achieve targeted mutagenesis in both tobacco and rice. Similarly, Lachnospiraceae-derived LbCpf1 has also been used to achieve targeted mutagenesis (Yin et al., 2017).Epigenome editing represents the third phase of plant GE, wherein changes are introduced to engineer the chromatin via modification of epigenome at specific sites. It involves targeted, locus-specific, reversible, and heritable alterations of the chromatin structure while bringing in no changes in the nucleotide sequences in the genomes by using epi-effectors. Epi-effectors are the epigenome engineering tools that represent a programmable DNA binding/DNA recognition domain in the genome. Additionally, the catalytic domains of chromatin-modifying enzymes (DNA methyltransferases and histone acetylases) represent components of an Epieffector. Different epigenome editing tools are available for creating, erasing, and reading various epigenetic codes in plants (Jeltsch and Rots, 2018;Miglani and Singh, 2020;Miglani et al., 2020).Currently, epigenome editing has been performed through three molecular platforms: zinc-finger proteins (ZFPs), transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs), and CRISPR and dead CRISPR/Cas proteins. These act as DNA-binding domains (DBDs), and after interaction with epigenetic domains, they modify the epigenetic marks at targeted sites in the genome to bring about a restructuring of chromatin architecture and gene expression. The principle of epigenomic editing rests on the formation of fusion proteins between a designed DBD (ZFPs/ TALEs/nuclease null or dead Cas9) that targets an attached enzymatic domain (chromatin modifiers; DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) or histone acetyltransferases (HATs) to define genomic target sites. Hence, the DNA sequences of the target genomic site are presented to DNAbinding protein domains that affect DNA function in the presence of an enzymatic effector domain. This way, epigenome editing allows the precise modification of individual chromatin marks at selected genomic sites (Nakamura et al., 2021).Besides modulating gene expression, epigenome editing is an appealing approach for understanding the mechanism of chromatin modification, cellular reprogramming, and regulatory functions. It has applications in both basic research involving gene expression studies and application-oriented epigenomic engineering of crop plants. The characterization of epialleles (i.e., alleles that are genetically alike but show variable genetic expression due to epigenomic modifications) is gradually picking up to be fully exploited in future crop improvement programs. Epigenome editing holds great promise in improving crops by creating novel epiallelic diversity that can be exploited for future precision and smart crop epi-breeding (Gahlaut S K et al., 2020;Giudice et al., 2021;Kakoulidou et al., 2021). For epigenome editing, a modified CRISPR/dCas9 known as dead, deactivated, null, or nuclease deficient Cas9 (dCas9) has been created by silencing two mutations of the RuvC1 (D10A) and HNH (H841A) nuclease domains (Qi et al., 2013). The CRISPR-dCas 9 approach is attractive as it helps overcome the limitation of the DBD approach, wherein for targeting a different sequence, a corresponding distinct protein is required, making it difficult to target a wide range of loci in the genomes. In this respect, CRISPR-dCas9 associated system offers flexibility as associated gRNAs help the Cas proteins achieve genomic specificity (Nakamura et al., 2021). A single dCas protein can be reoriented to target different loci simply by altering the sequence of its associated gRNA. This way, the technology offers a flexible platform for targeting almost any genomic sequence (Brocken et al., 2018). Epigenomic editing depends on inducing changes in chromatin architecture to influence gene transcription and relies on primarily inducing reversible and heritable changes in epigenetic marks such as DNA and histones' methylation, acetylation, and phosphorylation. This results in novel genetic variation in the form of epialleles and has tremendous potential for crop enhancement through epibreeding. Although several publications have demonstrated the feasibility of epigenome editing in A. thaliana (Table 3), its modalities need to be standardized in crop plants for commercial application.The first successful instance of epigenome editing was achieved in the model plant species A. thaliana (Johnson et al., 2014). A ZFN fused to RdDM (RNA-directed DNA methylase) component SU(VAR)3-9 HOMOLOG 9 (SUVH9) was involved in the recruitment of PolV during RdDM mediated via methyl-DNA binding SUVH2 and SUVH9 proteins at the FWA target to display DNA methylation induced gene silencing. Many other components of RdDM, such as SHH1, NRPD1, RDR2, DMS3, and RDM, when joined with ZFs, have also been shown to induce methylation at the FWA target in A. thaliana (Gallego-Bartolomé et al., 2019). A CRISPR dCas9-SunTagbased targeting system coupled with tobacco DRM methyltransferase (NtDRMcd) was used to target DNA methylation in A. thaliana (Zhong et al., 2014;Papikian et al., 2019). It resulted in the induction of DNA demethylation at FWA and SUPERMAN promoters affecting gene transcription and triggering a developmental phenotype. Further, a repressive effect of H3K9me2 and non-CG DNA methylation on both meiotic DSB and crossover formation in plant pericentromeric heterochromatin resulted in manipulation of the rate and positions of crossing over. Increase in meiotic recombination in proximity to the centromeres (pericentromeric recombination) and meiotic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in Thale Cress (Papikian et al., 2019). Recently, Gallego-Bartolomé et al. (2018), Gallego-Bartolomé et al. (2019), and Gallego-Bartolomé (2020) used ZF and CRISPR-dcas9-SunTag systems fused with the catalytic domain of human demethylase TET1cd to test several RdDM components such as RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 2 (RDR2), Microchidia 1 and 6 (MORC1 and MORC6), RNA directed methylation 1 (RDM1), and defective in meristem silencing 3 (DMS3) to induce targeted DNA methylation/demethylation at FWA locus in A. thaliana. ZF fusion with catalytic domain human demethylase TET1cd and SunTag-TET1cd system resulted in demethylation of the promoter of FWA (Flowering Wageningen) gene and CACTA1 transposon and activation of gene expression. While the fusion of ZF-RdDM and ZF-MORC6 enhanced targeted FWA methylation, Microrchidia (MORC6) targeted DNA methylation and triggered AGO-and DRM2-dependent methylation and gene silencing in A. thaliana (Gallego-Bartolomé et al., 2019;Gallego-Bartolomé, 2020). These studies provide important experimental evidence to design and utilize a highly targeted and heritable DNA methylation/ demethylation system to modulate gene expression in crop plants.Fusion of CRISPR dCas9-HAT1 gene resulted in hyperacetylation at AREB1 (abscisic acid-responsive elementbinding protein 1) locus leading to activation of endogenous promoter of AREB1. This improved transcription of the AREB1 gene involved in ABA perception improved chlorophyll content and drought tolerance due to the activation of bZIP TF, which can activate several stress tolerance-related genes such as RD29A (Paixão et al., 2019). Further, Li et al. (2020a) showed essential requirements of methylated CG (mCG) and mCHG by using CRISPR dCas9-TET1 fusion (where H can be A, C, or T) for targeting RdDM machinery to re-methylate loci. RdDm target loci were shown to form stable epialleles in the presence of specific histone and DNA methylation marks to induce alternation between two epiallelic states at a specific locus.Recently, Ghoshal et al. (2021) used CRISPR-bacterial methyltransferase MQ1v and CRISPR-SunTagMQ1v and Frontiers in Genetics frontiersin.org developed a CRISPR-based CG-specific targeted DNA methylation system to achieve de novo induction of CG methylation at different loci with varying efficiency. CRISPR-SunTagMQ1v was shown to be more potent than CRISPR-MQ1v. These MQ1v-based tools appear to be attractive as they offer flexibility to induce methylation at different levels at different loci and show high specificity attributed to the Q147L mutation. Further, the study also demonstrated that for some loci, CG methylation alone was enough to silence gene expression, and for these loci, CRISPR-MQ1v and CRISPR-SunTagMQ1v systems were likely to be more efficient than the DRM2-based SunTag system developed by Papikian et al.(2019) described above.The above examples show the potential of epigenome editing technology in modulating gene expression and showing observable changes in the phenotypes by altering the DNA methylation status at various genetic loci in A. thaliana. Similar studies need to be extended to crop species for exploiting the advantages of locusspecific modulation of DNA methylation through epigenome editing. The new tier of epigenetic variability generated by epigenome editing has significant potential in bringing about the genetic enhancement of crop species.Epigenome editing, as discussed here and in many other reviews (Gahlaut V et al., 2020;Giudice et al., 2021;Kakoulidou et al., 2021), offers opportunities for editing epigenetic codes in plant genomes globally or at selected loci to create novel genetic variability. To harness the benefits of epigenomic editing, however, it is important to define the specific epimark(s) linked with specific phenotypes and agronomic traits of interest. In this context, genome-wide mapping of epigenomic marks and epigenetic target identification are among the current thrust research areas. A few genetic elements controlled by DNA methylation and linked to desired plant traits have been identified. For instance, naturally occurring epi-alleles that accumulate high levels of vitamin E in tomatoes are associated with differential methylation of a SINE retrotransposon located in the promoter region of gene VTE3(1) (Quadrana et al., 2014). In cotton, the COL2 epi-allele is associated with DNA methylation changes and affects flowering time (Song et al., 2017). It is important to accumulate epigenomic data in various crop species to help identify the potential candidate editing targets. Information on genome-wide changes in DNA methylation in response to environmental stress has been gathered in crops such as rice (Guo et al., 2019;Rajkumar et al., 2020), wheat (Kumar et al., 2017), soybean (Song et al., 2012), and sesame (Komivi et al., 2018).Base editing (BE) is a novel GE technology representing the fourth phase of the evolution of GE platforms wherein a single nucleotide in a DNA or RNA can be substituted irreversibly. The process does not involve a double-stranded breaks (DSB) and hence bypasses the undesirable effects of NHEJ and HDR mechanisms. Of all the previous tinkering tools, BE is the most attractive for the simple reason that here the genome modification is \"base-pointed\" and precise. It does not involve additions or deletions in the genome (i.e., no change occurs in the DNA content of the organism). Neither does it involve the Frontiers in Genetics frontiersin.org incorporation of DNA from another organism (i.e., the edited organism does not become a GMO). It minimizes the chances of unintended, unwarranted effects on the phenotype (Rees and Liu, 2018;Deb et al., 2022). With a perfect BE toolbox, one can envisage generating desirable alleles for a trait by simply making the required substitutions. All that is required is a base modifying enzyme linked to a modified endonuclease, such as dCas9, which can target a desired region in the genome but not cause a DSB. Since the advent of this technology in 2016, it has become possible to execute C to T and A to G transition and C to G transversion editing. Figure 3 presents a schematic representation of the working mechanism of the base editing methodology that has been employed for GE.GE has been revolutionized by engineering the CRISPR/ Cas9 to enable cytosine base editing (Komor et al., 2016). The first-generation cytosine base editors (BE1) comprised of catalytically dead dCas9 (D10A, H840A) fused with rat apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (rAPOBEC1), a cytidine deaminase operating on ssDNA via a 16aa XTEN linker at its N-terminus (rAPOBEC1-XTEN-dCas9). Although BE1 was highly efficient in converting C:G to T:A in vitro, the same decreased considerably when assessed within cells because of the base excision repair mechanism (BER). To bypass the in vivo repair response and overcome decreased efficiency, secondgeneration cytosine base editors (BE2) were formed by fusion of Uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor (UGI) to the C-terminal of BE1. This inhibited the action of Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), which would otherwise have catalyzed the removal of U, resulting in reversion to C:G through BER. The C:G to T:A conversion efficiency was sought to be further enhanced by generating a nick on the non-edited DNA strand, thereby stimulating the cellular mismatch repair mechanism (MMR), which would replace the G on the nicked strand opposite the U on the target strand by an A, resulting in a U:A, which gets repaired to result in the desired T:A substitution. This resulted in BE3, a BE2 with a dCas9 modified to enable nicking activity (nCas9-H840A), resulting in much more efficient C:G to T:A substitutions (Komor et al., 2016).Although CBEs use naturally occurring cytosine deaminases to convert cytosine to uracil or 5-methylcytosine to thymine, no known adenine deaminases could deaminate the adenosine in DNA. In a significant breakthrough, Gaudelli et al. (2017) used directed evolution to form a modified transfer RNA adenosine deaminase (TadA*), which could catalyze the deamination of deoxyadenosine in an ssDNA resulting in a deoxyinosine. TadA* was joined through the XTEN linked to the N-terminus of Cas9 nickase with a nuclear localization signal (NLS) at its C-terminus (TadA*-XTEN-nCas9-NLS). The group engineered seven generations of ABEs to arrive at ABE7.10, which had high efficiency in converting A:T to G:C (Gaudelli et al., 2017).It had been observed that although the efficiency of C to T transitions increased considerably by fusing UGI to BE1, in absence of the glycosylase inhibitor, C to T conversions were not so clean and were accompanied by C to G and C to A transversions (Komor et al., 2016). This action of glycosylase, which sought to be inhibited in CBEs for improved recovery of clean C to T substitutions, was tapped for accomplishing C to G transversion in CGBEs. Uracil DNA N-glycosylase (ecUNG) from Escherichia coli (Kurt et al., 2021;Zhao et al., 2021) or rat XRCC1 (Chen et al., 2021) were linked to a nCas9 (D10A) and further fused with a rat cytidine deaminase rAPOBEC1 (Chen et al., 2021;Zhao et al., 2021) or its engineered variant rAPOBEC1 (R33A) (Kurt et al., 2021) or with human activation-induced cytidine deaminase (h-AID) (Zhao et al., 2021). The resultant CGBEs or GBEs (glycosylase base editors), UNG-nCas9-APOBEC1, XRCC1-nCas9-APOBEC1, UNG-APOBEC1-nCas9, and h-AID-nCas9-UNG, result in the conversion of C to U and subsequently to G via base excision repair (Chen et al., 2021) or by translesion polymerization (Liu et al., 2016). The nicking of the opposite strand triggers the repair machinery of the cell, which converts C:G to G:C.Dual-base editors have recently been developed by merging the cytosine and adenine deaminases in a single editor termed variably as SPACE (synchronous programmable adenine and cytosine editor) (Grunewald et al., 2020), STEMEs (saturated targeted endogenous mutagenesis editors) (Li et al., 2020), ACBE (adenine and cytosine base editor) (Xie et al., 2020), and DuBEs (dual-base editors) (Xu et al., 2021). Grunewald et al. (2020) fused the monomeric TadA of miniABEmax-V82G6 and pmCDA1 of Target-AID5 with the adenine deaminase at the N-terminus and cytosine deaminase at the C-terminus of nCas9 (D10A). Sakata et al. (2020) and Xie et al. (2020) also used the same architecture. Zhang et al. (2020) developed DuBEs (A&C-BEmax) by fusing the two deaminases to the N-terminus and found that hAID-TadA-TadA*linked to nCas9 (D10A) along with two UGIs yielded higher editing efficiency compared to multiplexing with individual deaminase editors in human cells. Li et al. (2020) developed STEMEs by fusing both deaminases, APOBEC3A/ecTadA, to the N-terminus of nCas9 (D10A) and tested them in rice. They reported better C to T and A to G editing with the DuBE than that achieved using co-delivered deaminases and could generate herbicide resistance in rice. Overall, DuBEs were more efficient in C to T edits than A to G. However, the plant DuBE version 1 (pDuBE1) developed by Xu et al. (2021) using TadA-8e and LjCDA1L-4 (Lethenteron japonicum CDA1-like 4) fused to the opposite termini of nCas9 (D10A) displayed highly efficient simultaneous A to G/C to T edits (49.7%) in rice calli. Liang et al. (2022) furthered the scope of DuBEs by engineering an AGBE (fusing a CGBE with an ABE), which could render efficient C to G, C to T, C to A, and A to G editing possible in mammalian cells.Base editing (C to T transitions) in plants was demonstrated for the first time in rice (Lu and Zhu, 2017;Ren et al., 2017;Zong et al., 2017;Li et al., 2017). Lu and Zhu (2017) formed a fusion protein, APOBEC1-XTEN-Cas9(D10A), as described by Komor et al. (2016), put it under the ubiquitin maize promoter, and used it for editing OsNRT1.1B and OsSLR1 in rice. Sequencing confirmed C to T (1.4%-11.5%) and C to G (1.6%-3.9%) substitutions in both genes to be more in SLR1 than NRT1.1B. Indels (10%) were much more than the <1% reported by Komor et al. (2016), probably because no uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI) was used. Zong et al. (2017) tailored the base editors by including UGI to form pnCas9-PBE (rAPOBEC1-nCas9-D10A-UGI) and pdCas9-PBE (rAPOBEC1-dCas9-UGI) and found that these bring about C to T substitutions in three rice (cell division cycle mutation 48 OsCDC48, nitrate transporter OsNRT1.1B, and a plant architecture gene OsSPL14), one wheat (TaLOX2), and one maize (ZmCENH3) gene with hardly any indels. Cas9 nickase-based editor was more efficient than the one with dCas9. In the same year, Li et al. (2017), while reporting greater than 40% substitutions, proposed that editing efficiency could vary depending on the target locus amongst three targeted loci (one on OsPDS and two on OsSBEIIb) of rice.One of the limitations that were obvious in the initial period of the use of this technology was the restriction imposed by the availability or otherwise the canonical PAM sites in a genome. To overcome this challenge, Cas variants/orthologues with relaxed PAM sites both naturally occurring and engineered have been employed. Further, since the first reported use of rAPOBEC cytidine deaminase from a rat in BE1, deaminases sourced from other organisms such as human apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (hAPOBEC3A) (Gehrke et al., 2018;Wang W et al., 2018), hAID (Hess et al., 2016), Petromyzon marinus cytidine deaminase 1 (PmCDA1) (Nishida et al., 2016), and their mutated forms with varying features vis-a-vis editing window, size, sequence preference, and so on have been reported (Cheng et al., 2019).Various proof of concept studies conducted in plants for base editing using natural and engineered variants of Cas in combination with different cytidine/adenine deaminases have been listed in Table 4. A SpCas-9 variant, SpCas9-VQR (D1135V + R1335Q + T1337R), recognizes NGAN and NGNG PAM sites, broadening the reach within a genome (Kleinstiver et al., 2015). Ren et al. (2017) used this variant to develop two CBEs for rice, rBE3 (APOBEC1-XTEN-Cas9n-UGI-NLS) and rBE4 (APOBEC1-XTEN-Cas9nVQR-UGI-NLS), and successfully edited a blast susceptible protein and OsCERK1 (a receptor kinase) with an efficiency of 17%. Steinert et al. (2015) and Kaya et al. (2017) recommended the use of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9) in plants because of its smaller size, longer target sequence, different PAM, and somewhat higher efficiency than spCas9. A variant with three mutations E782K/N968K/R105H (SaCas9-KKH SaKKH) has a relaxed PAM (NNNRRT) compared to the wild type (Kleinstiver et al., 2015). Qin et al. (2019) developed nSaCas9(D10A) and nSaKKH(D10A) nickasebased CBEs (Sa-BE3, SaKKH-BE3, Sa-eBE3, and SaKKH-eBE3) and ABEs (Sa-ABE and SaKKH-ABE/ABE-P5) reporting up to 71.9% cytosine edited (nSaCas9, SLR1 gene) and 63.2% adenine edited (nSaCas9, OsSPL17 gene) rice plants. Veillet et al. (2020) used the nickase SaCas9 (nSaCas9) with PmCDA1 to modify granule-bound starch synthase (StGBSS) and Downy Mildew Resistant 6 (StDMR6) in potato. It recognizes 5'--NNGGAT-3′ as a PAM site and has an editing window from −23 to −22. Nishimasu et al. (2018) engineered spCas9 to recognize NG (spCas9-NG), a relaxed PAM, and used the nickase version fused with activation-induced cytidine deaminase (nSpCas9-NG-AID/Target-AID-NG) to determine their editing efficiencies. Although Target-AID had a better efficiency at the canonical PAM, Target-AID-NG had a wider PAM repertoire and performed better than the former at other PAM sites, whereas xCas9-BE4 (Hu et al., 2018) was the least efficient in mammalian cells. Zhong et al. (2019) tested xCas9(D10A)-rAPOBEC1, xCas9(D10A)-PmCDA1-UGI, and Cas9(D10A)-NG-PmCDA1-UGI in rice and concluded that xCas9(D10A)-based editors were comparable in efficiency to those based on wtCas9(D10A). The former demonstrated better fidelity concerning the protospacer, and Cas9-NG-based editors were more efficient among all three tested at relaxed PAM sequences. Endo et al. (2019) used SpCas9-NGv1 nickase in rice. Veillet et al. (2020) used SpCas9NG-based CBE for editing granule-bound starch synthase (StGBSS) and Downy Mildew Resistant 6 (StDMR6-1) in potato. They also tested the performance of this editor in tomatoes by targeting two PAM sites in the acetolactate synthase (ALS) gene. GGT gave a lower efficiency (32%) than the canonical PAM NGN (64%). Hua et al. (2018) adopted ABE7-10 (Gaudelli et al., 2017), developed adenine base editor plant version 1, ABE-P1 [TadA*7.10-SpCas9(D10A) nickase], and 2, ABE-P2 (TadA*7.10-SaCas9(D10A) nickase), and tested them on two rice genes: ideal plant architecture OsIPA1 and slender plants OsSLR1. In 2019, they made several new versions, ABE-P3, P4, and P5, using SpCas9nVQR (D10A) and SpCas9-VRER (D10A) to increase target genome accessibility. They could successfully edit at four loci: SPL14, SPL17, SPL16, and SPL18. With the same set-up, they could demonstrate simultaneous cytosine and adenine editing using ABE-P2 and CBE-P1. Similar to reports in mammalian systems, there were no indels or off-target or any other unplanned base substitutions seen in rice. However, the editing windows were larger in the target genes. Hua et al. (2019) explored the use of SpCas9 and SaCas9 variants for widening the scope of the adenine base editing toolbox. They used nickases of VQR-, VRER-, and SAKKH-SpCas9 engineered variants to form three ABEs, ABE-P3 (pRABEspVQR), ABE-P4 (pRABEsp-VRER), and ABE-P5 (pRABEsa-SaKKH), and two CBEs with spCas9-VRER and saCas9-SAKKH, all of which were designed and tested in rice. The CBE and ABE formed with xCas9 were not efficient. Wang et al. (2021) compared the capabilities of ABE8e and ABE7.10 in Nicotiana benthamiana and established that ABE8e (60.87%) was more efficient than ABE7.10 (20.83%). Sretenovic et al. (2021) studied the applicability of CGBEs, for affecting transversions in plants for the first time. They improvised the three CGBE platforms for successful use in humans (Chen et al., 2021;Zhao et al., 2021;Kurt et al., 2021) for use in three plant species: rice, tomato, and poplar. All three used the rat-derived rAPOBEC1 or its engineered variant rAPOBEC1 (R33A). rAPOBEC1 in combination with ecUNG or rXRCC1 was fused with nCas9 (D10A), whereas rAPOBEC1 (R33A) was linked to rescuing and nCas9 (D10A). Three, four, and two target sites were chosen for editing in rice, tomato, and poplar, respectively. As compared to BE3, all three CGBEs induced better C to G conversions, but the overall efficiency of conversion was less than that reported in humans. The efficiency of editing using SpRY, which is not PAM dependent, was also assessed. The authors achieved C to G editing, although the efficiency varied according to the system and target site. Because this was the first report, much needs to be done to improve the efficiency of plants.Base editing is still an evolving technology, and many reports primarily demonstrate the successful use of a base-editing toolbox in different plants. This technology can create random variations within genomes, which can be screened and selected for advantageous traits. It also holds a great promise for improvement in traits affected by SNPs. Applications of the technology have been reported mainly as a gain of function for herbicide resistance and disease resistance and improvement in plant architecture, eating, and cooking quality (Table 4).Base editing of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) and acetolactate synthase (ALS1) genes has been shown to confer herbicide resistance in rice (Li et al., 2020b;Liu et al., 2020;Zhang et al., 2020), tomato (Veillet et al., 2019;Veillet et al., 2020), potato (Veillet et al., 2019), watermelon (Tian et al., 2018), apple (Malabarba et al., 2021), pear (Malabarba et al., 2021), oilseed rape (Wu et al., 2020;Cheng et al., 2021), Arabidopsis (Chen et al., 2017), foxtail millet (Liang et al., 2022), and wheat (Zhang et al., 2019). The eating and cooking quality (ECQ) is of utmost importance for all cereals, and it is primarily determined by the amylose content in the grain, determined by the Waxy (Wx) gene-encoded granule-bound starch synthase I (GBSSI) (Li et al., 2016). Xu et al. (2021) used CBEs to develop rice lines expressing a range of amylose content (0%-12%), which improved its ECQ considerably by making several substitutions near the soft rice allele site in Wx. Similarly, Li et al. (2020a) lowered the amylose content in rice grains. Veillet et al. (2020) incorporated base substitutions in the GBSSI locus in potato, which could eventually be used for controlling amylose content in the tubers.Traditional methods of inducing mutations become especially difficult in polyploid species because they possess more than two copies of a gene. Base editing has successfully generated heritable substitutions in polyploid species such as oilseed rape, wheat, and cotton. Hu et al. (2020) used BnA3A1-PBE in rapeseed and demonstrated an editing efficiency of up to 50.5%, much higher than 23.6% reported by Cheng et al. (2021) and 1.8% by Wu et al. (2020). Li et al. (2018) demonstrated slight success (0.1%-1.1%) of PABE 1-7 in affecting A to G transitions in the TaDEP1 and TaGW2 wheat loci.It is quite evident that this technology has immense potential, and once the challenges of discovering more efficient, PAMindependent DNA-binding proteins, better deaminases that can affect cleaner edits with zero off-targets, and engineering all possible substitutions are found, base editing can create a revolution in the field of plant sciences in general and crop improvement in particular.Prime editing marks the fifth phase of evolution in GE platforms. The technique was first developed and standardized in human cells. Prime editing facilitates indels and all 12 possible base-to-base conversions, including transversions and transitions, without triggering the error-prone repair pathways by the DSB (Anzalone et al., 2019). Briefly, in this technique, paired/coupled prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) is composed of single gRNA that is complementary to the one strand of the targeted DNA along with a primer-binding site (PBS), and the customized sequences to be replaced at the target site fused with Cas9 nickase are also present (Kumar et al., 2021). The PBS region primes to the second DNA strand to drive reverse transcriptase (RT) linked with the Cas9 nickase. RT transcribes and, in the process, copies the information straightaway from pegRNA into the intended target site. Following this, 5′ and 3' are the single-stranded overhangs integrated into the genomic DNA via endogenous DNA repair mechanisms (Anzalone et al., 2019).Research has successfully validated three generations of primer editors (PEs), PE1, PE2, and PE3, in humans so far. In PE1, the first-generation PEs, wild-type reverse transcriptase from commercial Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) fused to the C terminus of the Cas9 (H840A) nickase was used, triggered by the expression of pegRNA in a distinct plasmid. As mentioned earlier, pegRNA harbors a spacer sequence to recognize and bind to the intended target site. In addition, pegRNA carries an 8-15 nt of PBS and a template sequence to drive RT. However, the template sequence also contains a customized, altered DNA sequence to be incorporated at the intended site. The efficiency of this PE is largely determined by PBS length. Generally, 8-16 nt PBS length has been found to deliver results with increased efficiency (Anzalone et al., 2019). In an attempt to further increase the efficiency of this PE, numerous variants of M-MLV RT have been used. These variants were generated by inducing mutations in M-MLV RT. These mutations were found to alter processivity, thermostability, RNaseH activity, and DNA-RNA substrate affinity. In developing second-generation prime editors, PE2 an RT with five mutations (D200N, L603W, T330P, T306K, and W313F), when fused with the nickase, was found to increase the efficiency of the GE by 1.6-5.1 fold (Sretenovic and Qi 2022). The use of PE2 was found to hinder the efficiency primarily due to two factors. Firstly, the choice of single-stranded overhangs called \"flaps\" between unedited and edited to be paired with the native unmodified DNA strand. Secondly, choosing DNA strands as a template for DNA repair between unedited and edited was rather random (Gaudelli et al., 2017;Sretenovic and Qi, 2022). Many studies have shown that the introduction of nick in the unmodified strand enhanced the editing efficiency in both plants and animal cells (Komor et al., 2016;Gaudelli et al., 2017;Zong et al., 2017). Hence, to generate third-generation prime editors, PE3, nickase employed was used with an additional sgRNA to simultaneously nick the other complementary strand (Anzalone et al., 2019). This strategy enhanced the editing efficiency to introduce point mutations three-fold (Anzalone et al., 2019). With the use of the same protospacer, off-target instances were found much lower for PEs in comparison to the use of Cas9 (Jiang et al., 2021;Jiang et al., 2022). The increased efficiency of the prime editor is attributed to multiple DNA hybridization events that occur with the use of PEs. At first, the intended genomic DNA and spacer of the pegRNA hybridize. Next, hybridization occurs between the target sequence in the genomic DNA and the PBS of the pegRNA, adding to the sequence specificity of the system. Finally, the target DNA also hybridizes with the edited DNA, which further adds another layer of sequence specificity to the system (Jiang et al., 2021;Jiang et al., 2022). On the contrary, in a regular CRISPR/ Cas9 system, only one step of hybridization occurs between the sgRNA and the target genomic DNA occurs (Jiang et al., 2022;Zhuang et al., 2022). Figure 4 presents a schematic representation of the working mechanism of the prime editing methodology that has been employed for GE.The success of prime editing protocols hinges on optimizing critical parameters such as transformation system, selection of suitable vectors, design of prime editor cassettes (nuclease/ nickase), structure/sequence of, for example, pegRNA, sgRNA, codon optimization of the vector constructs, promoters, use of novel/engineered endonuclease, ribozymes, reverse transcriptase, targeted genes, and method/s of detection. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and floral dip agroinfiltration are the preferred modes of gene transfer as single copy inserts are efficiently achieved. However, other methods such as electroporation, PEG-mediated gene uptake, microinjection, and particle bombardment have been tested in different plants and are now expanding rapidly to include monocots (rice and maize), dicots (Arabidopsis, Nicotiana benthamiana, potato, and tomato), and even the bryophyte, Physcomitrium patens (Perroud et al., 2022) that is well known for incorporating DNA into specific genomic sites due to its innately high frequencies of homologous recombination (Rensing et al., 2020).Researchers have been experimenting extensively with the precise modeling of the molecular tool kit for high efficiency and specificity in several plants. As mentioned earlier, three versions of prime editors (PE1, PE2, and PE3) have been tested since 2019 in human and plant cells. The versions vary in the use of nickase, type of reverse transcriptase, position (C terminal or N-terminal fusion with nickase), length of the prime binding site, and types of editing predicted (Jiang et al., 2022). Promoters driving the expression of the prime editor apoprotein and the gRNAs play an important role in the overall scheme of prime editing in taxa and target gene of choice (Sretenovic and Qi 2022). Target sites have been categorized as type I and type II based on the position of the edit concerning the nicking site. If the edit is within 1-6 bp downstream of the pegRNA nicking site, then higher editing efficiencies are observed compared to the type II targets, where the targeted edit position(s) are 7-17 bp downstream of the pegRNA nicking site (Sretenovic and Qi, 2022). The editing efficiencies of the same vectors thus vary with the target genes. This was reported in rice, where the prime editor Sp-PE3 and gRNA were successful in introducing an S627N mutation in the endogenous ALS (acetolactate synthase) but were unsuccessful in editing the APO1 (aberrant panicle organization) gene (Hua et al., 2020a). It was also successfully induced and present in regenerants. Three endogenous genes (GAI, ALS2, and PDS1) from tomato were tested for prime editing by PE3 strategy using an optimized prime editor. Prime editing frequencies of 0.025%-1.66% were observed in four pegRNAs out of seven tested, comparable to rice editing frequencies (Lu et al., 2020). Three genes (OsPDS, OsACC1, and OsWx) were used as targets to test the pPE2 system. Using the t-RNA processing strategy was also used to target a rice endogenous 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3phosphate synthase (EPSPS) gene (OsEPSPS) for prime editing to confer glyphosate resistance. A peg RNA with gRNA (59 bp RT, 13 nt PBS) and a second gRNA with the ability to nick at position 66 downstream were synthesized that could introduce triple mutations. For this gene-editing, the prime editing efficiency was 2.22% with both homozygous and heterozygous lines in rice (Li et al., 2020c). The pPPEM construct was tested in rice protoplasts, targeting gene OsSULTR3, six at two different edits for the bacterial leaf streak disease susceptibility. The editing efficiencies ranged from 0.7 to 2.2%. Besides editing endogenous genes, editing the transgenic reporter gene-fluorescent protein gene EGFP by SpPE2, SpPE3, and SaPE3-was tested in rice calli. The inactive insert was edited to active form successfully by SpPE3 at higher efficiencies than SpPE2, and none were observed with SaPE3, even though Sa compatible Cas9 and pegRNAs are required for efficient editing.The prime-editing gRNAs of diverse structures with varied PBS and RT lengths and nicking position of gRNAs have also been reported to affect the prime editing efficiency (Xu et al., 2020;Hua et al., 2020a;Tang et al., 2020;Butt et al., 2020).Optimization of the melting temperature (Tm) of the PBS to around 30 °C coupled with a dual-pegRNA strategy in plants (Lin et al., 2020) drastically increased the editing efficiencies by 17fold in rice protoplasts, although stable expression and transmission of the edits remain to be seen. Inclusion of the t-RNA processing system (Xie et al., 2015) allows for the generation of multiple gRNAs that allow for \"multiplex GE.\"Detection of editing relies on the rates of transformation coupled with the rate of editing. Several studies have reported the co-transfection of T-DNA-containing vectors with the transgene and the PE vectors harboring the editor and the edit. The targeted sites are usually PCR amplified from the genomic DNA isolated from transformed plants and sequenced to identify the edits. Most researchers have done Sanger's sequencing, although the HRM-High Resolution Melting analysis has been included before sequencing by Perroud et al. (2022). Hi-TOM (high-throughput tracking of mutations) was used by Xu et al. (2022) in maize and rice.Different selection and counter-selection strategies have been tested for the selection of transformed/edited cells. Perroud et al. (2022) have tested the use of APT/APRT (adenine phosphoribosyl transferase) enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of adenine to AMP in Physcomitrium. This enzyme can convert 2-fluoroadenine (2FA) supplemented in the culture medium into a toxic 2-fluoro AMP counter selective compound. Thus, if the editing vectors are successful, the APRT is mutated and the cells can grow and regenerate into plants on the 2FA medium. The DNA from these plants is further analyzed to detect edited sequences. In potato, the widely used acetolactate synthase (ALS) has been used for selection. ALS confers resistance to several herbicides, particularly chlorsulfuron, and the specific amino acid change in StALS Pro-187/186 to serine was targeted. In addition, the primary selection of transgenics was on kanamycin. A PE-PE2 system was designed by fusing hygromycin phosphotransferase (Hpt) to the C-terminus of the nSpCas9-M-MLV region with P2A, a self-cleaving 2A peptide, driven by Ubiquitin promoter of maize. PE-PE2 increased the editing efficiency by about threefold for three pegRNAs and gave improved editing frequencies (Perroud et al., 2022).The ability to introduce both transversions and transitions is by far the most significant attribute of prime editing technology. In addition, PEs have been found to successfully introduce insertions, deletions, transitions, and transversions (Anzalone et al., 2019). Perroud et al. (2022) reported that 0.06% of transformed protoplasts of Physcomitrium were edited, which is less than the standard Cas9 mediated and base editing mutagenic strategies. However, the edit's specificity is higher than CRISPR/Cas systems, and off-targets are few or none. Substitutions, insertions, and deletions have been observed in the different taxa using the varied versions of prime editors.The editing efficiency was similar in PE2-and PE3-based vectors in Physcomitrium, whereas in potato, same PE3 constructs failed to edit the ALS gene, which could be edited by PE2-based vectors albeit at low frequencies. In rice, editing efficiencies were between 1.55% and 31.3% (Hua et al., 2020b;Butt et al., 2020;Li et al., 2020d;Lin et al., 2020;Tang et al., 2020;Xu et al., 2020). The editing efficiencies ranged from 0.7% to 2.2%. Overall, the PE3 strategies were less efficient in plant cells than animal cells. However, further modifications and adaptation of the technique would standardize prime editing for more crop systems. Wang et al. (2021) have reported insertion of up to 66 bases in Arabidopsis protoplasts, which is a four-fold increase over the 15-base insertion reported in rice. For prime editing in dicots and monocots, easy-use vectors on PE2 and PE3 strategies have been created, named pPPED and pPPEM (Wang et al., 2021). They have designed a pPEG cassette for insertion of peg RNA or sgRNA, and then pPEG is inserted in the vectors PPEM or PPED. The pPPED vector was targeted in Arabidopsis. Editing efficiency is thus influenced by the length of reverse transcriptase and primer-binding site in the designed pegRNAs and sgRNAs.In addition to the biological parameters (plant taxa, molecular toolkit, transformation, and regeneration system), the physical temperature parameter has a profound impact on the editing frequencies. Because the efficiency of the M-MLV reverse transcriptase is enhanced at higher temperatures, 32 °C and 37 °C were tested, but no significant differences were reported. However, the temperature variations were also tried in prime editing (PPE) systems at 26 °C and 37 °C in rice, giving significantly higher editing activity at 37 °C (Lin et al., 2020).In summary, the modifications in the design of constructs, particularly to avoid by-products resulting from the scaffold of the pegRNAs and reduction of off-targets, have been found to increase the editing efficiencies. Gao (2015) suggested the shift from a knock-out strategy to a knock-in strategy by employing the homologous recombination process of DNA repair to increase targeted mutagenesis. This has been incorporated as a key attribute in the prime editing technology. Among the diverse strategies designed to achieve targeted mutagenesis, prime editing is a landmark advancement in methods achieving increased efficiency and reduced off-target effects. This method, for the first time, presented an efficient strategy to introduce all the 12-point mutations. With the availability of many diverse vectors (editors and pegRNAs) developed by the different research groups and web-based design algorithms available (Peg-finder, PE-Designer /PE-Analyzer, pegIT, PrimeDesign, and PlantPegDesigner), the deployment of this technique is at the threshold of revolutionizing precision breeding of crop plants. As most of the genes of importance rely on altering a few and specific nucleotide changes to confer traits rather than large-scale alteration of genes, prime editing presents an opportunity to drive the development of gene editing platforms that are precise, effective, and elegant.Under the scenario of ever-rising food demands and climate change, there is tremendous pressure on scientists and breeders to speed up the development of climate-resilient-high-yielding cultivars. The application of molecular breeding approaches has achieved great success in accelerating performance gains in various crops in the past decade. However, the need of the hour is to integrate new biotechnological methods and technologies in the existing breeding programs to further realize genetic gains. The unprecedented advances made in GE technologies have shown great potential in genetic enhancement and boosting crop production. This review highlights how newly evolved CRISPR/Cas systems have successfully brought about a paradigm shift in crop improvement programs. There has been a significant advancement in understanding the functions of gene complexes underpinning complex traits, which was extremely daunting using the existing gene discovery approaches. The efficient use of GE tools in manipulating complex traits, especially in polyploid crops, has now become feasible, especially when used in combination with the next-generation sequencing platforms.Despite the substantial deployment of the CRISPR/ Cas platform in developing crops with desired traits, studies demonstrating the translation of the laboratory-based results into the field have been anecdotal. In addition to being relevant at the genome level, the improved traits must also be realized in the field without any trade-offs or counter effects on other traits of importance. Additionally, any genome strategy developed should pose no threat to the environment and should be able to reduce the application of pesticides and fertilizers. One of the major challenges in developing cultivars by the GE route is rooted in low transformation and regeneration efficiencies. Numerous agronomically important crops such as sunflower, cotton, and many others either have long transformation protocols with low efficiencies or are outrightly recalcitrant. In addition, in crops where transformation protocols have been established, regeneration efficiencies remain low, making the application of GE strategies challenging.Furthermore, public acceptance of GE-modified crops has not come of age yet. A common misconception about these crops adversely affecting health and the environment has led many farmers to avoid reaping benefits from growing these crop cultivars. This bias automatically trickles down to the consumers and, in turn, results in limited acceptance of these crops for public consumption. Therefore, we believe, scientists across the globe need to ensure a healthy flow of information using present-day outreach tools, including social media, to educate the consumers about the differences between transgenic approaches and the risks and benefits of using modern GE-modified crops.Although GE platforms are radically different, precise, and superior to traditional transgenic approaches, at the moment, these methods still go through governmental scrutiny and assessment in many countries. Nonetheless, in the foreseeable future, new-age GE platforms in plants are contemplated to be employed as a tool for efficiently engineering the majority of crop plants. We expect and hope that these methods can be integrated into breeding programs globally with relatively lesser regulatory procedures compared to conventional transgenic approaches. The development of these measures will need comparable attention and consistent research efforts to continually assess developed crop varieties on various climatic and genomic parameters, especially in our present-day rapidly changing climate and pest pressure.The evolution of various GE platforms has made it possible for molecular biologists to precisely target gene(s) of interest. Primarily, only CRISPR/Cas has been used for gene editing. Only recently, techniques such as epigenome editing, prime editing, and base editing have been used for gene editing. These techniques are powerful alternative strategies that have been developed for gene editing in plants. However, glaring challenges still exist that continue to impede the goals of achieving sustainable crop production. These challenges stem from the complexity of both endogenous and exogenous cues in plant development, making it nearly impossible for any single GE platform to deliver efficiently. Present-day advances in GE protocols need to be primed toward generating platforms that are more precise, efficient, accurate, and, most importantly, feasible. At first, no off-target silencing should result from using these methods. Secondly, the delivery and results obtained in crop plants should not vary from species to species. In addition, the genomic changes should be traceable in future generations with precision and also remain feasible with respect to cost and labor. Lastly, at present, we need more dynamic regulatory measures in place to ease the development and use of these platforms in crop improvement programs.Song, Q., Zhang, T., Stelly, D. M., and Chen, Z. J. (2017). Epigenomic and functional analyses reveal roles of epialleles in the loss of photoperiod sensitivity during domestication of allotetraploid cottons. Genome Biol. 18, 99. doi:10.1186/ s13059-017-1229-8 Song, Y., Ji, D., Li, S., Wang, P., Li, Q., Xiang, F., et al. (2012). The dynamic changes of DNA methylation and histone modifications of salt responsive transcription factor genes in soybean. PLoS One 7, e41274. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0041274"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2419273548.json b/main/part_2/2419273548.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..387dbcd2894b45eb7aeedd8437e3a6be866648bd --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2419273548.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a2cf45a9c7fa8f5efc52a022fe8c7d70","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d82edd21-4778-4cca-8851-7baee2808234/retrieve","id":"895361949"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0836ccd7-4bf7-413b-9bff-35d0c5b57720","content":"This report covers the period 1 st January -31 st December 2011, and reviews the CRP Annual Reports and information sources, to identify the key issues (specifically in terms of progress towards outputs, outcomes and SLOs) arising from the CRPs, and factors that have influenced these, that are of relevance to the emerging CRP portfolio. The report continues with an analysis of the issues that have been noted in the CRP reports and suggests how improvements can be made to increase the effectiveness of the CRPs and their contributions to the SLOs in the future.Experiences have been different for the CRPs, and therefore the issues that are presented hereafter may not have been articulated by all of the CRPs. The CGIAR CRP Portfolio is emerging. At this point, it is a grouping of individually developed research programs, which were approved, funded and started up at different points in time. The challenge remains to make them work together as a portfolio and thus contribute to a shared set of SLOs. Both the CRPs and the Consortium are aware of this and will continue to strengthen mechanisms for supporting effective interactions among CRPs to arrive at a coherent and well articulated portfolio.Emergence of a more coherent programmatic approach Highlights from the CRPs The CGIAR has a wealth of knowledge and experience in key areas that contribute to its four System Level Outcomes (SLOs). Special strengths include research to increase the production of crop, tree and animal commodities important to the poor, research on natural resource management, including the conservation and improved use of water, soils and forests, and social science and economic and policy research that benefits the poor by increasing their access to agricultural resources, food and markets. A far-reaching reform process, described in the Strategy and Results Framework (SRF), resulted, in 2011, in the commissioning of the first of a new set of fifteen large and ambitious CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs) driven by their potential impact on development. The adoption of an agricultural research-for-development (R4D) approach throughout the system means that all research priorities and activities will be guided by their potential contributions to the four SLOs. The CGIAR system as a whole is responsible for impact that will be assessed through a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework that aims to reduce duplication, provide evidence and present the relevance, scientific value, efficiency and effectiveness of CRPs and Centers. This first portfolio level report synthesizes experience with the five CRPs which were operational for 6 months or more during 2011 (the status of the whole portfolio as of the 31 st December 2011 is provided in Annex A). management, the CGIAR Consortium will ensure that the SRF, in its next iteration, is sufficiently focused through a transparent set of criteria and priorities that reflect both the demands from our national and regional partners, and the need for the CGIAR to produce international public goods (IPG) within the international R4D institutional landscape. The SRF Action Plan addresses this and the next Portfolio Annual Report should bring more concrete examples of this greater strategic focus.Emergence of a more coherent programmatic approach. In their development and early planning, the CRPs have catalyzed an intense process of reflection and rationalization, allowing Center scientists' mechanisms to rationalize, connect and develop research programs that hold the promise of greater impact. This is an evolutionary process that also takes into account bilaterally funded projects, bringing them into the new frameworks developed under CRPs. It is early in this process, but there are already some notable achievements (see Box 1).The Consortium is taking the reform seriously and implementing a deep cultural change from a Center-focused to a Program-focused research agenda. This takes time, so in this first year of functioning (half a year for 3 of the CRPs), one of the significant accomplishments is the creation of entirely new teams of scientists that have already started work on a results-oriented research agenda, aligned with the CRP proposal. This time investment, upfront, is expected to bring about more development-oriented results and outcomes within the second year of implementation of the CRPs, and greater impacts in the longer-term. In terms of new working relationships, we already note a major expansion as a result of the inclusive CRP design phase In 2011, many outputs and outcomes were produced, some based upon Center projects that started before the reform, as could be expected, and others that are the result of the new, programmatic way of working, in spite of the need to put in place new teams and learn how to work together on a scale never reached previously. This augurs well for the continuing implementation of the reform.Research progress. The outputs and outcomes achieved in 2011, were, as could be expected, largely a result of ongoing projects. The 2011 CRP annual reports discuss both actual and potential impact of their research. They report on outputs but in most cases without describing the significance of these outputs for development outcomes or system-level strategic results. This reflects reporting, in the main, on pre-reform projects whose outcome and impact mapping were not fully aligned with that of CRPs, as well as the short duration of the reporting period during which most of the CRPs focused on getting up and running. CRP Leaders have described this as the legacy of funded projects, approved before the reform, and the incipient stage of most CRPs. It is clear that from 2012 onward, more attention will be required, from each CRP, on the quantification of the significance of the outputs and outcomes produced through agreed upon indicators. The SRF Action Plan, now under formulation, will develop a process to arrive at an agreement on these measures.CRPs' impact on the Global Climate Change Agenda CCAFS have been contributing to discussions on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). CCAFS with other agencies played a major part in 2011 in agriculture being referred to the UNFCCC Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) for detailed discussion. This was a process that had been stalled at the UNFCCC during COP15 and COP16. If agriculture is fully incorporated into the agreements emerging from the UNFCCC then greater levels of climate finance to farming communities, and more attention to capacity building and technology transfer in the agricultural sector should be expected. Meanwhile, in Durban in 2011 the UNFCCC adopted the ForestsTreesAgroforestry proposed approach to setting reference levels (RLs) and Reference Emission Levels (RELs) critical for enabling countries to receive REDD+ payments.Global market prices for rice are volatile. Runaway prices, like those of the 2008 rice crisis, could have been prevented had the right people been given the right information at the right time. In 2011, GRiSP began to develop a global rice information gateway to provide timely and accurate information to decision makers in rice-growing countries. The global rice information gateway will provide real-time crop condition reports; short-to medium-term projections of production, consumption, trade, and prices under different domestic and trade policy regimes and macro conditions; and national, subnational, and household survey data.Responding to volatile and rising food prices, MAIZE has initiated, in collaboration with the Mexican Government, systems based approaches to increase the productivity, profitability, sustainability and the resilience of maize based systems in seven agro-eco regions in Mexico. After one year, MasAgro is working with more than 80 partner organizations and has established farmer and market participatory research on more than 20,000 hectares. The rapid scale up of knowledge intensive innovation systems potential is remarkable and should also provide key lessons for the wider scaling up of knowledge adoption.GRiSP has released Swarna-Sub1, which can remain underwater for up to 2 weeks and recover once the water subsides, as a variety for submergence-prone areas in India, Nepal, and Bangladesh. The target is for this variety to be grown on more than 6 million hectares in South Asia. In sub-Sahara Africa, in 2011, a total of 78 NERICA (New Rice for Africa) varieties were adopted on a total of 0.7-1 million hectares. In 2011, farmers who had participated in NERICA-rice project activities benefited from additional income of US$14.4 million, while the spinoff to nonparticipant farmers is estimated at $28.7 million-a total of $43.1 million. In Latin America, CIAT and the Latin American Fund for Irrigated Rice (FLAR) have been developing rice with a \"Latin flavour\"-varieties better suited to the region's conditions and widespread practice of direct seeding-to break current yield barriers.By 2011 over 22,500 aquaculture farmers had increased their annual profits to US$1075 per household over a baseline of US$356 in 2008. This impact came from the USAID funded project \"Greater Harvest and Economic Returns from Shrimp\" (GHERS), through focusing on the productive capacity of shrimp and fish farms in coastal districts of Bangladesh. The project has been incorporated into AAS and aligned with its research agenda, and the cross-cutting CRP work in Bangladesh (see below).Novel Climate Analogues Tool CCAFS has developed the novel Analogues tool to support climate and crop models with on-the-ground empirical testing. It helps stakeholders \"view the future climate today\". The analogues tool connects sites with statistically similar ('analogous') climates, across space (i.e. between locations) and/or time (i.e. with past or future climates). Once analogue sites are identified, information from local field studies or databases can be used and compared to provide data for further studies, propose high-potential adaptation pathways, facilitate farmer-to-farmer exchange of knowledge, validate computational models, test new technologies and/or techniques, or enable us to learn from history. Users may manipulate the tool in the free, open-source R software, or access a simplified user-friendly version online. This tool will greatly increase the scope of farmer-led action research on climate-smart options. The tool has emerged as a result of new partnerships in CCAFS with the global change research community.Methodologies. The 5 CRPs have reported the development of novel methodologies for bringing about impact through research. A selection of these is presented in Box 2.GRiSP is pioneering applications of ICT in both research and technology dissemination activities. Cell phones are being used by field staff and village volunteers to collect field data and real-time information to complement conventional instruments of socio-economic surveys. Farmers and extension workers in the Philippines are getting field-specific nutrient best management guidelines through mobile phone applications of a computer-based decision tool, Nutrient Manager for Rice (NMRice). NMRice provides farmers with fertilizer recommendations on the basis of where their field is (geographically) located, the variety of rice they use and when it was sown, the availability of irrigation water, how they manage crop residues, and the yield history of the field. NMRice is now being adapted to Sahelian conditions and a prototype NMRice is going through field testing and validation in Mali and Senegal.ForestsTreesAgroforestry is developing and using approaches that build on traditional and indigenous knowledge to harness the opportunities intrinsic to the planet's vast tree diversity, for instance through improvements to seed-seedling systems (including nurseries) and the protection of wild fruit species (such as in Central Asian Republics).CCAFS conducted baseline surveys through collaboration of many Centers and partners, at 15 benchmark sites in three regions and 12 countries. More than 6,000 households were surveyed with data being gender disaggregated. In what is believed to be an unprecedented step for the CGIAR, the household survey data were available to the public within six months of final field data collection. Survey manuals, data sets and site reports are publicly available through the CCAFS website.MAIZE is implementing the Seed of Discovery Strategic Initiative to comprehensively study and classify the genotypes of CGIAR and partners' seed collections. Molecular characterization (next generation, high-throughput sequencing) combined with field trials will make available the untapped wealth contained in the world's native maize genetic resources -novel alleles and adaptive traits -as an international public good. This effort, of unprecedented scope, applying new molecular technologies, is funded and implemented in collaboration with the government of Mexico and international partners.To ensure an appropriate focus from the beginning AAS is reassessing its entire research portfolio in terms of coherence and the extent to which it provides a foundation for bringing about development change. This will identify the best methodologies (as well as outputs) to be used in the CRP. AAS is also developing a novel transformative approach to addressing key constraints to women's access to involvement in research processes and research outputs.The development and planning of the CRPs. CRP proposals were developed in parallel and individually, rather than as a portfolio. The CRPs were based on the criteria jointly agreed between the Consortium, the Independent Science and Partnership Council (ISPC) and the Fund Council (FC) and with the then SRF in mind 2 . The FC's request for fast-tracked CRPs hastened the process. The very tight schedules did not allow addressing of CRP Portfolio issues such as managing inter-CRP linkages, strengthening gender research across the portfolio, developing harmonized operational plans and governance structures, working together on data and knowledge management, management of overlaps and gaps in the agenda, and critically, doing strategic planning in the context of a performance management framework (there was no articulation of the SLOs when the CRPs were approved). In 2011 a strong emphasis was put by the Consortium on addressing gender issues across the portfolio and some work was initiated to develop criteria for the selection of common research site and implementation plans among some CRPs, best shown by the emerging work in Bangladesh highlighted below. There is much to still do in relation to harmonization and achieving coherence in the whole portfolio, including in the way existing research is integrated into CRPs (Box 3 provides some examples), and this is one of the 2013 Consortium priorities, as already mentioned.Integration of ongoing programs and projects into the CRPs. One of the reasons for the reform was to move away from the fragmentation of the research agenda (with more than 3000 funded projects, often of just a few years duration) toward a programmatic approach in which much larger programs are funded for longer periods based on their expected outputs and outcomes. This process of incorporation takes time; and this is apparent in the reporting of the CRPs. Whilst there are some notable achievements e.g. influencing global policy, many of the outputs and outcomes reported by the CRPs are still relatively atomized, as many reflect on-going research projects. CGIAR Centers continue to source bilateral funds from donors for research projects that are aligned with CRP proposals. Some CRPs have had to negotiate with donors who seek outcomes which are not in alignment with those of the CRPs.MAIZE has a relatively high level of ongoing bilateral funding (only 19% of its targeted budget is coming from Windows 1 & 2). One of its challenges, and opportunities, is to successfully transform nine Strategic Initiatives into nine effective work teams which are aligned towards one common vision of success. On the funding side, MAIZE has been very successful in aligning the content of significant bilateral and window 3 projects with its overall strategy.During the transition years when pre-existing projects are being completed only projects that contribute to developing IPGs under one or more of the 6 research themes of the program will be included in AAS. In some instances, however, new opportunities to develop AAS relevant research will emerge in other countries. As these opportunities are considered, priority will be given to those countries and locations that lie in one of the large aquatic systems that are the focus of the program, namely Asia's mega deltas, African fresh water systems, and coastal and coral reef systems in Asia Pacific.CCAFS inherited on-going work from 15 Centers. Different Centers have different priorities and ways of working that are not always in line with the CCAFS strategy. The PMC 3 and ISP 4 have set a target of three years to phase out non-strategic work and get greater strategic coherence. All proposed Center activities for 2012 were rated for relevance and Centers received feedback on the degree to which their portfolio was aligned with CCAFS. Budgets to Centers in 2012 were altered by up to 24% on the basis of two criteria, the more important of which was \"strategic fit\". Furthermore, strategic priorities for additional investment have been identified and communicated with Centers -and those Centers taking them up have been appropriately resourced.The three CGIAR Centers involved in rice research IRRI, AfricaRice, and CIAT, have actively looked for ways to align their rice research programs. From the end of 2008 and within the context of the CGIAR change process thinking evolved toward the development of a truly global rice R&D program, a partnership that would go beyond \"just\" enhanced collaboration among the three CGIAR Centers. Numerous consultations with a wide range of organisations developed an overall vision and strategy for what was to become GRiSP. Early in 2010, JIRCAS, CIRAD, and IRD joined the three CGIAR Centers as the main architects of GRiSP. Because of this relatively long 'incubation time', the six leading Centers have, by 2011, fully aligned their own research activities and relevant projects to the joint GRiSP strategy, themes, and products.To set priorities, GRiSP conducted an ex-ante impact assessment of its program. For further priority setting and program adjustments, it is developing a more detailed strategic assessment of expected impact from current and possible new rice research activities. GRiSP, like most other CRPs, started from a basis of existing research, which is to 80% locked into existing bilateral grants, which were mapped onto its themes and product lines. Hence, up to 80% of the initial proposed allocation of funds was based on ongoing research, plus a number of new priorities that were identified during the CRP development process. Over time, as current bilateral grants run out or are replaced, more flexibility in resource allocation according to the new priorities will emerge.Cultural change. The reform and the CRPs represent a deep change in modus operandi for the CGIAR. The CRPs involve different approaches to collaboration -across Centers (Annex B) and with partners. This requires a significant cultural change in the CGIAR -and cultural change takes time. Many initiatives to foster cultural change were embarked on in 2011, though it is recognized that this will be a significant theme in 2012 and beyond. These initiatives involved, for example, giving greater roles for partners in governance mechanisms, catalyzing collaboration amongst Centers, task forces to provide synergies to research efforts, pooling scarce human resources, and major inter-centre efforts to enhance communication and dissemination (Box 4).There has been an upsurge in collaboration amongst centers around common research and development themes.CCAFS hosted an annual science meeting with representatives of all 15 Centers to reflect on progress and identify gaps and weaknesses. CCAFS has initiated a number of data sharing platforms (e.g. www.agtrials.org, which collates trial data from across the CGIAR) and work in the CCAFS research sites involves multiple Centers that can share information and hardware (e.g. baseline survey data, weather stations). A third of the members of the CCAFS management team are from partner University organisations outside the CGIAR. CCAFS hosted a joint meeting with the global environmental change community to identify key areas where the CGIAR and global research communities could collaborate. Several ideas from that meeting are being implemented.MAIZE has facilitated farming-systems focused innovation platforms within major bilateral programs, in Mexico, Africa and South Asia, involving four of the six maize-based systems prioritized within the MAIZE strategy. Even though working in different geographic regions of the world, cultures and partners, opportunities are being identified to integrate approaches, assure crossplatform learning and to identify opportunities for cooperation with other CRPs.GRiSP organized more than a dozen international workshops to develop new global and regional research initiatives and partnerships. Half of the GRiSP management team is from partner agencies (JIRCAS, IRD, CIRAD). This team met several times in 2011, usually remotely, to cut down on travel costs. GRiSP launched five Africa-wide Task Forces in 2011 to provide synergy to research efforts across the continent.Gender. The reform has given CRPs a clearer focus on gender and on the need to develop proper capacity to address gender equity in research and product delivery. The CRP proposals showed great variation in the commitment to gender. Development of a Gender Strategy by each CRP following Consortium Board-approved Guidelines was initiated in 2012. Thus, 2011 should be viewed as a baseline against which we expect to see significant improvement in 2012. In 2011, CRP reporting of gender research reflects the absence in the SRF of a system-level theory of change and strategic results that explicitly integrate gender. Since CRPs lack this unifying framework for monitoring and reporting their gender-related outputs and outcomes, the 2011 CRP reports provide fragmented snippets of gender-related research derived from milestones (activities) scattered in Program logframes. Overall, the quality of reporting on gender is highly uneven with more attention given to the process of integrating gender into the research agenda than to the significance for key aspects of program design such as targeting and priority setting. Making collective, portfolio-level sense out of individual CRP gender results can only be accomplished with a supporting logical framework that defines shared, system-level gender outcomes. The SRF Action Plan will be an opportunity to reform this situation.A Consortium-level Gender strategy, based on extensive consultations, was approved by the Consortium Board in December 2011. It contains guidelines for CRP-level gender strategies which the Consortium requested all CRPs to develop within 6 months of inception. In December 2011 the Consortium recruited a Senior Gender Advisor, who has been supporting development of these strategies. Four of the five CRPs had draft gender strategies in 2011 (AAS, CCAFS, ForestsTreesAgroforestry, GRiSP). Provision of a hypothesis and baseline analysis that address the significance of gender for the achievement of Program outputs and outcomes in the reports is mixed. Attention to gender budgeting is uneven. Overall, those that did report Gender Strategy development provide evidence that progress was made in 2011 with the integration of gender into research. operational work plan with gender budget were developed for 2012. Substantive research was published on the gender implications of improved value chains for non-timber forest products.GRiSP developed a draft Gender Strategy, work plan and formed a cross-cutting support team. GRiSP's main gender-related activities include strategic research that will identify gender-equitable rice R4D and extension programs, mainstreaming the use of gender differentiation and gender analysis in adaptive research processes, building and enhancing capacities of women scientists engaged in rice Research, Development and Extension and using innovative strategies to empower grassroots women with technical knowledge and skills. Research milestones achieved include identification of the implications for breeding of gender-related constraints and varietal trait preferences.While a wide range of MAIZE related projects and initiatives use gender as an analytical tool, the CRP challenges researchers to find more avenues that lead to greater empowerment of women and young adults. The CRP developed plans to implement a Gender Audit in 2012, which will cover the research and institutional domains.Managing inter-CRP Linkages. Linkages between CRPs will require further definition and dedicated management of time and effort in future. The scope and dimension of such linkages range from simple timely information exchange to sharing infrastructure to jointly developing research projects. Currently, linkages are worked on through communities of practice and through shared sites. For example, in 2011 plans were developed for the Khulna hub in Bangladesh, originally established by the Challenge Program on Water and Food, to have 7 CRPs led by AAS (Policies, WHEAT, GRiSP, Nutrition, LWE 5 and CCAFS) working together. A risk of working with a large diversity of partners is losing in integration and coherence. Harmonization is a priority of the Consortium, and several initiatives were begun in 2011 (e.g. meeting of science leaders in the CRPs and the Centers to initiate the discussions, meeting of communications officers to define branding procedures, testing of new platforms for internal communication etc 6 ).Developing partnerships (with non-CGIAR partners). In 2011 partnerships within the CRPs were significantly strengthened on a number of fronts (Box 6).CCAFS is a joint initiative between the CGIAR and the Earth Systems Science Partnership (ESSP). The ESSP is the umbrella organization for the world's greatest concentration of global change scientists. The ESSP partners are part of the governance system and are also represented on the management committee of CCAFS.MAIZE and GRiSP and have both developed Competitive Partner Grants. These enable a prioritization of partners and ensure that partners have greater control over activities they are engaged upon. The MAIZE grants are based on an annually reserved budget to bring in third parties. Through its bilateral portfolio, partner involvement in MAIZE increases consistently year after year.GRiSP collaborated with UNEP to establish the Sustainable Rice Platform to develop and promote standards for good agricultural practices and mainstream sustainable practices throughout the rice supply chain through public and private sector partnerships. Large regional projects such as CSISA 7 , STRASA 8 , and Green Super Rice bring together not only GRiSP CG centers and their NARES and ARI partners, but as well other CG Centers (such as WorldFish, CIMMYT, IFPRI, ILRI) and their partners, 5 Land Water and Ecosystems 6 See CGIAR annual report 2011 7 CSISA -Cereal System Initiative for South Asia 8 STRASA: Stress-Tolerant Rice for Farm Households in Africa and South Asia forming bridges among CRPs (e.g. GRiSP, MAIZE, WHEAT, and AAS). A GRiSP Coordinating Committee was formed in Japan, and a French Rice Science Partnership (FRISP) brought together a large number of French institutions involved in rice research.Setting up management systems. Realignment of management systems has taken place across the CRPs, with some guidelines from the Consortium and enlightened considerations in both the management of the CRPs and elements of the CRPs (Box 7). As well as management structures, GRiSP, CCAFS and MAIZE have established progressive management tools, both in terms of operational plans and progress and financial monitoring. AAS also felt that there was a risk that they would not be able to utilize the services of appropriate people to work on their CRP from other Centers. ForestsTreesAgroforestry believed that there was a risk of conflict if boundaries between CRPs were not sufficiently clear. When describing risks three CRPs mentioned the rapid start up.CRPs have developed novel management structures and approaches:GRiSP: has strengthened its links with key international research partners by bringing them into its management team, as mentioned above. The GRiSP Oversight Committee includes 7 international experts (non CGIAR), 5 BOT members from IRRI, AfricaRice and CIAT, and the DGs of IRRI and AfricaRice (ex officio). In 2011, IRRI's Deputy Director General for Research also acted as Director of GRiSP. At the subprogram level, Global Theme leaders have been appointed as well as regional theme leaders for Asia, Africa, and Latin America, and thematic contact persons at CIRAD, IRD and JIRCAS. These theme leaders/contact persons also serve as institutional science leaders and hence no additional management layer has been introduced.AAS has taken specific steps to reduce costs in some key areas. With the appointment of the Program Oversight Panel WorldFish has dissolved its own Science Advisory Committee. Similarly, rather than establish the position of CRP leader as another management cost, WorldFish has appointed its Deputy Director General to lead the program. By the end of 2011 the governance and management arrangements had been established and gender parity was almost reached.The CCAFS Independent Science Panel (ISP) held its first meetings in 2011. It consists of individuals from outside the CGIAR, from research and development agencies, with observers from the lead centre board and Earth Systems Science Partnership (ESSP). It focused its attention on the CCAFS business (implementation) plan, and in particular ensuring that certain strategic topics considered to be weak in the current portfolio were appropriately resourced. A further topic on their agenda was the selection of two new regions where CCAFS would operate.The MAIZE Management Committee is comprised of members from CIMMYT, IITA, the Kenyan NARS, SAGARPA (Mexican MoA) and the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture), reflecting the CRPs major partner categories(e.g. CGIAR Centers, NARS, private sector). It held its first meeting in October 2011 in Delhi.Similar to the development of the research portfolios, the budgets for all the CRPs were developed with some variable approaches to budget construction. There are inconsistencies in the treatment of overhead, growth scenarios, pass-through funds, bilateral funding, full cost recovery policies, CRP management costs, gender budgeting, and the 2% Cost-Sharing Percentage (CSP). Obviously, this was undesirable but the budget proposals were accepted when the CRP proposals were approved, and now have legal substance as they form part of the PIA for each CRP. Despite the differences in the budgeting approaches, all CGIAR centers operate in accordance with the Cost Allocation Rules as set out in CGIAR Financial Guideline No. 5. The oversight functions of F. Developing partnerships: Partnerships are not only a critical element for success of individual CRPs, but also for developing and maintaining an interrelated portfolio of research programs; they will increasingly be a priority for the Consortium Office. How to optimize partnerships for research and development and utilize lessons learnt in this will be critical for the evolution of the CRPs. G. Management Systems: Several approaches to streamlining management systems are being established by the CRPs corresponding to the CGIAR Principle on governance and accountability (Annex E). The next Portfolio level report will include analyses of the management structures so that lessons can be drawn and harmonization implemented where appropriate. It should also reflect on the connection between CGIAR Change Management Objectives and CRP Portfolio progress.Results-orientation towards a System agenda: During 2013 the SRF Action Plan will start being implemented which will affect the objectives of the CRPs through developing IDOs. These IDOs will link the research programs to the SLOs and the prioritization among and within the CRPs. The IDOs will be incorporated into the CGIAR Performance Management System (PMS). The PMS will be reflected in future reporting and analysis. (Sections 1-3)1. As set forth in the CGIAR Joint Declaration endorsed by the CGIAR members on December 8, 2009, the Consortium and the Fund Council (the \"Parties\")1 agree to work together through the CGIAR to reduce poverty and hunger, improve human health and nutrition and enhance ecosystem resilience through high-quality international agricultural research, partnership and leadership.2. These are the overarching Principles that guide the Fund Council and the Consortium in their joint efforts to implement the SRF in an efficient and effective manner. The Consortium and the Fund Council, through adoption of these CGIAR Principles, are committed to the strategic objectives set forth below and recognize that they have shared responsibility, as well as mutual trust and accountability, through their separate roles and obligations, for the achievement of these objectives: Food for People: Create and accelerate sustainable increases in the productivity and production of healthy food by and for the poor.  Environment for People: Conserve, enhance, and sustainably use natural resources and biodiversity to improve the livelihoods of the poor in response to climate change and other factors.  Policies for People: Promote policy and institutional change that will stimulate agricultural growth and equity to benefit the poor, especially rural women and other disadvantaged groups.3. In furtherance of these objectives, the Parties agree to:  Harmonize their approach to increasing and stabilizing funding for implementing international agricultural research for development through the CGIAR Fund and the Consortium, respectively.  Manage their operations and programs to achieve the system-level results set forth in the Strategy and Results Framework.  Work to ensure effective governance and efficient operations in the provision and use of resources, including controlling System Costs.  Collaborate and partner with and among funders, implementers, external partners and users of SRF research."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2437270455.json b/main/part_2/2437270455.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f47ea8dd752ed650aa38bb7833d1e7e744fe435 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2437270455.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"b892f939-571c-4089-b929-e2a18e6240a2","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2455505159.json b/main/part_2/2455505159.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..742783f3d348389b9f2a2776bb9ad3a05ccc8ac1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2455505159.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"52e2726209f6e6639b237198f2b0d5f1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a6f03974-3fcd-4aca-bedd-5b956c248e84/retrieve","id":"-1240378552"},"keywords":["genetic resources","sorghum","pearl millet","climate smart crops","food and nutritional security","finger millet","foxtail millet","breeding"],"sieverID":"cb165b41-6148-401e-855f-cc37573c1556","content":"Sorghum and pearl millet serve as a major source of food, feed and fodder for the semi-arid tropical regions of developing world. These two cereal crops rank within the major six cereal crops with a staple food for about 250 million people residing in semi-arid tropic and dryland areas of south Asia and Africa. Sorghum and pearl millet are also regarded as climate-smart crops because of their extreme tolerance to heat (up to 42 • C air temperature), drought, and salinity. This Research Topic on Sorghum and Pearl millet but also Finger millet and Foxtail millet as climate resilient and nutrition-rich crops for food and nutrition security comprise 27 manuscripts. It aims to provide new insights into the genetic resources, high throughput precision phenotyping, breeding approaches, multiomics platforms, gene editing, disease resistance, and gene mapping. It also aims to accelerate breeding cycles for climate resilience and improve nutritional quality in these staple cereal crops.In the scope of food and nutritional security, understanding wild progenitors of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) would allow us to exploit the underutilized gene pool to develop more climate-resilient sorghum cultivars. The gene pool of natural sorghum ecotypes may harbor useful gene candidates for both biotic and abiotic stress. Genetic barriers in gene introgression from wild relatives to cultivated sorghum species hold a great challenge. Still, with the recent advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), more genomic data are available, which expands and extend the sorghum improvement programs using the novel, yet unexploited genes in sorghum's wild relatives (Ananda et al.). Temperature sensitivity and photoperiod of sorghum germplasm are important factors to identify accurate sources for developing cultivars with a broad adaptation, the photoperiod and temperature insensitive, photoperiod and temperature-sensitive and photoperiod sensitive and temperature insensitive sources identified in one of the studies could help breeders to use exact sources in their breeding program, the photoperiod and temperature insensitive accessions can be utilized to develop cultivars with broader adaptation. In contrast, the highly photoperiod sensitive tall accessions can be utilized for biomass and forage improvement and such breeding is suitable in India and USA (Upadhyaya et al.). This segment of research needs more of specific product profile including stress tolerance to meet the special market demand. A major challenge in sorghum breeding is the post-emergence grass weed. 4hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-inhibitor herbicides (e.g., mesotrione or tembotrione) can control a broad spectrum of weeds. The sequencing of 317 sorghum lines and QTL mapping genotypes G-200 and G-350 conferred a very high level of metabolic resistance to tembotrione controlled by a polygenic trait (Pandian et al.). Anthracnose is another devastating fungal biotic stress in sorghum caused by Colletotrichum saublineola; a review presented by Abreha and coworkers provides a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on the mechanisms of sorghum-C. sublineola molecular interactions, quantitative trait loci (QTL), and major (R) resistance gene sequences as well as defense-related genes associated with anthracnose resistance (Abreha et al.). A systematic validation of these identified genes and QTLs in coming years can assist in breeding resilient sorghum cultivars for stress prone regions particularly in India and Africa.The contemporary and updated perspective in understanding the genetic and biochemical interactions between the fungal pathogens, their corresponding mycotoxins, and their host has been reviewed (Ackerman et al.). In a multi-location field study, grain yield (GY) and grain mold resistance was tested. Genotype-by-trait biplots indicated that GY is highly influenced by flowering time, 100-grain weight (HGW), and plant height (PH). In contrast, grain mold resistance was influenced by glume coverage and pH (Aruna et al.). Another important parasitic weed in sub-Saharan Africa is Striga hermonthica, it is one of the most devastating factors for sorghum production. To identify new sources of resistance to Striga, in total 64 sorghum genotypes consisting of landraces, wild relatives, improved varieties, and fourth filial generation (F4) progenies were evaluated for both pot and field trail which resulted in more resistant and highyielding genotypes from F4 derivatives. These genotypes need more acceptance by the farmers (Muchira et al.). Developing drought-tolerant sorghum varieties with high protein content and tolerance to grain mold is highly important. Nagesh et al. identified four sorghum varieties PYPS 2, PYPS 4, PYPS 8, and PYPS 11, which are highly stable in low grain mold incidence (Kumar et al.). This study used additive main effects, multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype × environment interaction (GGE) biplot methods.Pan-genome analysis of sorghum using reference genomes and 354 genetically diverse sorghum accessions led to the identification of more than two million SNPs; association analysis identified approximately 398 SNPs significantly associated with important agronomic traits. Gene expression analysis under drought identified 1,788 genes that were functionally linked to the cell membrane, catalytic activity, molecular function regulation, response to the stimulus, metabolic process, cellular, and biological regulation. In total, 79 genes were absent from the reference genome assembly (Ruperao et al.). More such research analyses are required to strengthen sorghum pangenome assembly for increased traits association and its use in breeding program.Improved Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) is one of the primary goals for the global sorghum improvement programs. Root tissues of contrasting lines exhibited differential expression profiles for transporter genes such as ammonium transporter (SbAMT), nitrate transporters (SbNRT); primary assimilators [glutamine synthetase (SbGS)], glutamate synthase (SbGOGAT[NADH], SbGOGAT[Fd]), assimilatory genes nitrite reductase (SbNiR[NADH]3); and amino acid biosynthesis associated gene [glutamate dehydrogenase (SbGDH)]. Expression profiling of contrasting sorghum genotypes in varying N dosages provides new information in understanding the response of NUE genes toward adaptation to the differential N regimes in sorghum (Bollam et al.). Investigating the biological linkage between and among NUE, stay green and late flowering can offer appropriate breeding road maps for developing optimal NUE in stay green sorghum cultivars in future.Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) breeding in India has historically evolved from open-pollinated varieties to single cross hybrid breeding in a comprehensive manner with closer and continued association of CGIAR and NARS centers. To further accelerate the hybrid breeding efforts for drought-prone areas in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, the heterotic grouping of hybrid parental lines is essential to sustain long-term genetic gains (Yadav O. P. et al.). Pearl millet is nutritionally rich and high in micronutrients such as iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) and its increased dietary intake can prevent associated hidden hunger or malnutrition. The inclusion of minimum standards for micronutrients such as Fe and Zn content in the cultivar grain release policy is for the first time reported in pearl millet across the globe, motivate institutional commitments and progress toward incorporating essential nutritional traits in breeding pipelines (Satyavathi et al.). QTLs for Fe and Zn content from three distinct production environments were generated using a genetic linkage map consisting of 210 F6 recombinant inbred lines (RIL) population derived from the (PPMI 683 × PPMI 627) cross using genome-wide simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Two constitutive expressing QTLs for Fe and Zn were co-mapped in LG 2. The second one on LG 3, the QTLs candidate genes such as Ferritin gene, Al 3+ , K + , Zn 2+ and Mg 2+ transporters were identified using bioinformatics approaches (Singhal et al.). In another study, newly developed open-pollinated varieties (30 OPVs of which 8 are Fe/Zn biofortified) were tested for field performance and stability for grain yield, grain Fe and Zn contents across 10 locations in West Africa, resulting in a strong correlation (r = 0.98 * * ) between grain Fe and Zn contents that merit Fe-based selection and can be effective in pearl millet variety breeding (Gangashetty et al.).Importance of open pollinated varieties cannot be ruled out because of lower input cost, wider adaptation and timely seed availability. OPVs of pearl millet were tested in three different locations across India to check the variation in grain Fe and Zn contents. The results showed a highly significant positive correlation (across environment = 0.83; p < 0.01), indicating the efficacy of simultaneous selection for both traits (Sanjana Reddy et al.). A set of 105 forage-type hybrid parents of the diverse panel was genotyped following genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and phenotyped for crude protein (CP) under multicuts for two consecutive years. This led to the identification of one stable significant single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on LG4 for CP. Nine SNPs were distributed across six linkage groups except on LG2 (Govintharaj et al.). These identified loci require validation with robust phenotyping methods in forage gene pool including photo sensitive breeding materials which can facilitate forage quality traits improvement in pearl millet through marker-assisted selection.Transcript expression profiling for functional classification of a gene belonging to a small heat shock protein (sHSP) family in pearl millet under high-temperature stress led to the identification of two high-temperature-responsive markers Pgcp70 and PgHSF. Physio-biochemical trait screening of the contrasting genotypes among the eight different pearl millet inbred lines at the seedling stage resulted in the identification of PgHSP20 genes, which can provide further insights into the molecular regulation of pearl millet stress tolerance, thereby bridging them together to fight against the unpredicted nature of abiotic stress (Mukesh Sankar, Satyavathi et al.).Foliar blast disease of pearl millet is severe, caused by Magnaporthe grisea. To unravel the G x E interactions for identification and validation of stable resistant genotypes against foliar blast disease through multi-environment testing, a group of 250 different accessions from 20 different countries were collected and screened under natural epiphytotic conditions, which resulted in 43 resistant genotypes which can be used in future resistance breeding programs for pearl millet (Mukesh Sankar, Singh et al.).Pearl millet accessions that can use nitrogen efficiently needs to be characterized soon. In this aim in total 380 diverse pearl millet lines consisting of a global diversity panel (345), parents of mapping populations (20), and standard checks (15) were evaluated in an alpha-lattice design with two replications. Eleven nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) related traits across three growing seasons in an N-depleted precision field under three different N levels (0%-N0, 50%-N50, 100%-N100 of recommended N, i.e., 100 kg ha −1 ) resulted in 25 top N-tolerant and N-sensitive genotypes under low N conditions. Tolerant genotypes with low N may help identify genomic regions responsible for NUE. Its deployment in pearl millet breeding programs through markerassisted selection (MAS) can be facilitated (Pujarula et al.). Cabo Verde Islands are poorly explored for genetic resources related to plants. Their potential to supplement the genetic pool of cultivated species is an attempt to identify islands crop wild relatives (CWR) from the Poaceae family and provide a checklist of priority CWR taxa, highlighting particular conservation concerns and the areas which should be the focus of the most intensive conservation efforts in these islands (Rocha et al.). Similarly, the total antioxidant content of pearl millet flour and evaluation of 222 genotypes for antioxidant activity from inbred lines resulted in 18 candidate genes related to antioxidant pathway genes (flavanone 7-O-beta-glycosyltransferase, GDSL esterase/lipase, glutathione S-transferase) residing within or near the association signal that can be selected for further functional characterization (Yadav C. B. et al.).Multiomics combined with speed breeding is one of the answers to producing highly nutritious food crops (Weckwerth et al., 2020;Yang et al.). Furthermore, integration of the individual omics technique employing the \"phenotype to genotype\" and \"genotype to phenotype\" concept together with the systems biology approach may be beneficial for crop breeding improvement under different environmental conditions (Weckwerth et al., 2020). Recently, two important cereal crops, Pearl millet (C 4 ) and Wheat (C 3 ), were compared at the physiological and proteomics level to understand the drought stress response mechanisms. Tissue-specific proteome analysis of leaves, roots and seeds led to the identification of 12,558 proteins in pearl millet and wheat under well-watered and stress conditions. The physiological response was demonstrated using Odum's model. The study provides for the first time \"staygreen\" proteomics signatures for Pearl millet (Ghatak et al.). Furthermore, comparative proteome signatures for \"stay-green\" and \"senescence\" traits in Pearl millet and wheat under drought stress were identified and correlated with the physiological analysis. NAD-ME type photosynthesis was evaluated in both the cereals, and discriminant analysis via sPLS led to the identification of the putative protein markers, and correlation with an important physiological trait such as root length was determined. This study provides an opportunity to identify important molecular processes in C 4 traits essential for drought resistance and incorporate them into C 3 plants via genetic engineering (Ghatak et al.).The Research Topic also consists of manuscripts on finger millet (Eleusine coracana) and foxtail millet (Setaria italica), also members of the Poaceae family. Finger millet is an important cereal crop in southern Asia and eastern Africa. It has a long storage period, grows under arid and semi-arid environmental conditions, and has good nutraceutical properties. Blast disease in finger millet caused by the filamentous ascomycetous fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae) is the most devastating disease affecting the growth and yield of this crop in all its growing regions. Breeding strategies and challenges in improving this blast disease resistance in finger millet have been extensively reviewed (Mbinda and Masaki). A total of 314 global finger millet germplasm diversity panel accessions were genotyped, using the DArTseq approach to find the genetic diversity and population structure within these genotypes, the authors obtained 33,884 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers on 306 accessions after filtering, considerable genetic diversity, and the mean polymorphic information content was determined (Backiyalakshmi et al.). In crops, MADS-box transcription factors play vital roles in multiple biological processes. Genomewide identification and classification of MADS-box genes in foxtail millet have not been reported previously. In total, 72 MADS-box genes in the foxtail millet genome give an overview of the phylogeny, chromosomal location, gene structures, and potential functions of the proteins encoded by these genes. Expression patterns of 10 foxtail millet MADS-box genes that are upregulated in response to drought were analyzed in different tissues in response to different abiotic stresses because the SiMADS51 genes were found to be strongly induced by drought stress, the function of the SiMADS51 gene was assessed by expression in the model plants Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis Thaliana) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Zhao et al.). In another study, 108 diverse landraces and wild accessions of sorghum, pearl millet, and pigeon pea were studied by genotyping using the DArTSeq approach, which identified 45249 SNPs in pearl millet, 19052 in SNPs sorghum and 8211 SNPs in pigeonpea. Interestingly, sorghum had the lowest average phenotypic (0.090) and genotypic (0.135) variance within accession distances, while pearl millet had the highest average phenotypic (0.227) and genotypic (0.245) distances. These studies are very helpful to the genebank curators to understand the dynamics of the population within accession and support the planning of appropriate germplasm conservation strategies (Allan et al.).In summary, the variety of studies reported in these diverse crops, pearl millet, sorghum, finger millet and foxtail millet are comprehensive and provides immense knowledge to the coming generations of crop scientists, crop physiologists, plant biologists and breeders. The studies reported in this Research Topic (Volume I) provide us with clear global research goals and are in place on making more climate-resilient crops in future by close observing crop agro-climate variability. Breeders are provided with specific and comprehensive catalogs of important and validated gene candidates that are associated with resilience and nutritional traits. These groundbreaking studies and corresponding breeding programs will eventually enhance crop productivity and improve sorghum and millet-based food intake to meet the food and nutritional security in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. They also open up the path to new exploitation of these prestigious cereal crop plants in other regions of the world subject to climate crisis."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2463528279.json b/main/part_2/2463528279.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ee7c316fe5d9905d5995b648651d3bfa5ffba17 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2463528279.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a0a15a7303353b775c38b64d071c40bc","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/de7bc07e-9561-406c-bc15-3cd420dd0b42/retrieve","id":"-168321315"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"23c62d87-3912-4add-ac4a-313591c76843","content":"Towards the end of 2010, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) promoted the formation of a public-private partnership in Mexico that linked the main maize research and improvement centers (such as CIMMYT, INIFAP, Chapingo Autonomous University, among others), with the private seed production and marketing sector. Dubbed the Maize Seed Consortium, one of its main objectives was to evaluate, develop and/or deploy new high-yielding maize hybrids for distribution to maize grain producers, and at the same time contribute to the strengthening and diversification of the seed sector in Mexico. However, despite having had access to improved germplasm from research institutions such as CIMMYT, and having adopted new competitive hybrids, significant scope still remains to improve rainfed maize yields in Mexico.The analysis of this document considered the following: i. Sources of origin of the germplasm (CIMMYT, whether a purely CIMMYT-derived hybrid or a combination hybrid with partial CIMMYT background; Public: hybrids developed by the public research sector; or Private: products developed using entirely a company's own germplasm) ii.Number of CIMMYT hybrids (hybrids developed and released by CIMMYT) in its product portfolio. iii.Number of products with CIMMYT germplasm (hybrids or varieties developed by CIMMYT partners using up to 100% CIMMYT lines) iv.Sales of new CIMMYT hybrids compared to total company sales and other hybrids with germplasm from public institutions or private germplasm (the company's own) v.Markets reached vi.Marketing capabilitiesThis document presents a general overview of the companies that participated in the Maize Seed Consortium of Mexico (public-private association for the generation, evaluation and commercialization of maize seeds) (Figure 1), as well as a perspective of the use and commercialization of products with CIMMYT germplasm by institutions in other Latin American countries, and a description of the specific situation of 10 Mexican companies whose commercialization data in terms of limitations and strengths were analyzed. The Maize Seed Consortium was formalized in 2011 with the integration of just over 30 national companies (Mexican companies) that produce maize seed, but between 2011 and 2021, more than 80 companies and producer associations participated.However, the sample for this document considered 10 Mexican companies selected on the following criteria: 1) their product portfolios currently or previously included CIMMYT hybrids and/or proprietary hybrids with CIMMYT germplasm background; 2) availability of marketing data for most of the years analyzed (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019)(2020)(2021) and their detailed portfolios; 3) we know the target markets and marketing channels for at least a subsample of the products. The sample also took into consideration the need for representation of companies from the three agro-ecologies present in Mexico (tropical, subtropical, and even the much smaller highlands agro-ecology). The sample included maize seed companies from northern, southern, and central Mexico, in a range of sizes (see Table 2) 2 . Mexican seed SMEs obtain germplasm from three main sources: the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), especially CIMMYT; the National Institute for Agricultural and Livestock Forestry Research (INIFAP); and the private sector (including the company's own proprietary germplasm and any germplasm licensed in from other private-sector genetics providers) (Figure 2). Other public institutions such as the Colegio de Postgraduados are also involved, but to a much lesser extent. Dependence on CIMMYT germplasm is more notable for micro-enterprises if we consider the 10 companies analyzed for this document: 76.6% of their germplasm comes directly from CIMMYT, with 23.4% coming from public institutions; of the latter, at least 17% also contain CIMMYT germplasm 3 . In this respect, the sample may not be entirely representative of the Mexican maize seed industry as a whole, as the study focused specifically on companies working with CIMMYT germplasm.Small companies depend equally on germplasm from CIMMYT and public institutions: 39.4% of their germplasm comes from CIMMYT and 41.6% from public institutions (of the latter, 15% also contain CIMMYT germplasm). Many of these companies already generate their own germplasm, representing 19% of their product portfolio. This is partly due to the fact that CIMMYT's germplasm, training and support provided by this institution since 2010 have allowed them, among other things, to develop or strengthen their own breeding programs.Unlike small and micro-companies, medium-sized companies depend more on the germplasm they develop, which represents 67.4% of their product portfolio (50% of which are hybrids generated with parental lines having CIMMYT genetics). They practically do not use germplasm of origin from public institutions, which only represents 5.4% of their portfolio (and is known as well to contain CIMMYT germplasm). CIMMYT germplasm directly represents 27.2% of this group's portfolio (i.e., hybrids released by CIMMYT and combinations generated by companies with CIMMYT lines).The above information shows that CIMMYT is the main source of germplasm for the sampled Mexican companies regardless of their size. It is notable that even as companies grow and seek to generate their own germplasm, CIMMYT germplasm continues to represent a considerable percentage of its product portfolio. Larger companies have the strength to generate their own germplasm, and smaller ones depend more on germplasm of institutions such as CIMMYT or public institutions such as INIFAP. This does not mean that they cannot compete, since germplasm of CIMMYT and public origin has proven to be competitive both in terms of yield and agronomic traits (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The seed sales in Mexico of companies participating in the Maize Seed Consortium for the year 2021 were calculated using data from 31 companies that responded to the annual Seed Marketing Surveys and estimates for 32 other companies based on their average annual growth rates.In 2021, 63 Mexican seed companies participated in the Maize Seed Consortium. Most of the participating companies (67%) are micro-enterprises with annual sales of less than 10,000 bags of seed, 25% are small companies, and 8% are medium-sized. No large companies participated in the Consortium. It is important for companies to diversify their clients and not depend on sales to the government, since they are volatile and can change dramatically from one year to another; sales to the government represent an opportunity, but a dependency should never be created.Regarding the sales trends of the 10 sampled SMEs, it is notable that all but the smallest companies enjoyed significant growth: the four \"small\" companies growing by 60% between 2011 and 2021, and medium-sized companies by 65% for the same period (Error! Reference source not found.). The modest 5% decline in sales by the four sampled micro-enterprises between 2011 and 2021 is essentially attributable to just one company which saw a drop of just over 400 tons between 2020 and 2021, due to not being able to sell its products in government projects. Once again, the importance of not depending on sales to the government, since their volatility is very high and they also limit cash flow, since the payment for seed can take years or even not be paid at all. The sale in Mexico of new hybrids that were developed by CIMMYT's breeding programs has increased steadily since 2012 from just 420 bags to more than 70,000 in 2021. Similarly, an increasing number of hybrids and commercial seeds developed by the seed companies of the Consortium with the use of new CIMMYT lines has contributed to an increased number of varieties available to Mexican farmers.Unfortunately in 2020 and 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic, the elimination of government programs, and the decrease in the participation of companies in the Consortium, all led to a reduction in maize seed sales: the total number of reported bags of CIMMYT hybrids sold in Mexico (i.e., hybrids developed by CIMMYT maize breeding programs) was 196,613 in 2019 and less than 100,000 in 2021.In 2021, the Maize Seed Consortium sold at least 28 CIMMYT products, including 26 hybrids and at least two open-pollinated varieties (OPVs). The five CIMMYT hybrids with the highest sales represented just over 50% of the total sales of these products in 2021 (sales reported as of August 31, 2022; as of this writing, the sales reports of some participating companies are still pending) (Error! Reference source not found.). Three of these best-selling hybrids are for the tropics, one for the subtropics, and one for the highlands; three are white-grain and two are yellow. The development and release of competitive hybrids, as well as collaboration with CIMMYT and access to CIMMYT's improved germplasm, has in fact allowed companies to diversify their portfolios and develop their own germplasm improvement programs. The following tables (Table 4 through Table 8) illustrate examples of success stories of five Mexican companies with portfolio diversification, and which are five of the companies analyzed for this document.  By 2020, CIMMYT hybrid sales accounted for nearly 30% of their total sales. The company also developed some proprietary hybrids using CIMMYT lines (own germplasm combined with CIMMYT germplasm), which by 2020 represented more than 25% of its sales.  By 2021, sales of CIMMYT hybrids represented 15%, but 95% of their sales were products with CIMMYT germplasm, of which 69% were products with CIMMYT germplasm, but developed by the company itself -that is, using CIMMYT lines but the final combination of the hybrids was of their own origin.  By 2020, it had incorporated 9 CIMMYT hybrids that represented more than 25% of its sales.  By 2021, the 9 CIMMYT hybrids in its product portfolio represented 39.7% of its sales. In all, 16 of its products contain CIMMYT germplasm, together representing 70% of its sales.  In 2011, this company also depended 100% on hybrids and varieties from INIFAP. It occasionally sold hybrids privately owned by another private-sector entity.  By 2020, 50% of the company's seed products were CIMMYT hybrids, which represented more than 35% of its sales.  In 2021, 50% of its products were still hybrids with CIMMYT germplasm, and each of the public hybrids in its portfolio also contained between one and two CIMMYT lines.  By 2020, the company had incorporated 14 CIMMYT hybrids into its portfolio, which constituted more than 14% of its sales.  By 2021, the company continued to sell 10 CIMMYT hybrids, representing 9.4% of its sales. In addition, it incorporated for the first time a hybrid of its own development with the use of CIMMYT lines.  The company successfully incorporated CIMMYT hybrids, which represented around 30% of its sales between 2015-2017.  Since 2015, it has opted for the development of its own materials, which by 2020 represented more than 50% of its sales.  This company also developed more than 10 private hybrids from CIMMYT germplasm, which by 2020 represented more than 35% of its sales, and in 2021 its hybrids with CIMMYT germplasm had a 54.6% share of its sales.In contrast to Mexican companies, the number of products with CIMMYT germplasm developed by Latin American institutions in other countries (in the context of this study, namely Central America, Ecuador, Bolivia, Venezuela and Colombia) and the number of released products developed by CIMMYT for Latin American markets are mostly OPVs. In part, this is due to the fact that from 2010 to 2020, the Mexican government financed the development of hybrids, but of course with a focus on adaptability to the Republic of Mexico. In addition, in Mexico there is a greater development of seed companies than in Central America or even countries like Colombia or Venezuela. In fact, the National Seed Inspection and Certification Service of Mexico (SNICS) has the registry of more than 80 institutions that produce maize seeds and in Central American countries, apart from transnational companies, there are no more than five or so known seed companies per country. However, there is the fact that the Mexican seed regulatory environment allows different companies can produce and sell the same hybrid, which is not the case for Central America, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia and Venezuela, which has facilitated the emergence of a diverse and highly competitive seed sector in Mexico.In Mexico, more than 99% of the products released by CIMMYT for sale are hybrids, while in the rest of Latin America (in the context of this study, this includes Central America, Ecuador, Bolivia, Venezuela, and Colombia) OPVs represent almost 80% of released CIMMYT products. In fact, four of the five best-selling CIMMYT products in these countries are OPVs and only one is a hybrid. Of these, the CIMMYT OPV Postasequía stands out, representing almost 50% of the sales of all CIMMYT products sold by our Latin American collaborators. The other three OPVs in the top five are S07TLYNHGAB2, S06TLWQ SEQ-LN AB, and Catacama 9043.Regarding the \"combination products\" (maize products developed by collaborators using CIMMYT materials), in Latin America outside of Mexico there is information on the development of just over 20 products for the period 2010 and 2021 (NB: the dataset for 2021 is incomplete; as of this writing in August 2022, not all the institutions with which CIMMYT collaborates have provided information on their impact). However, it can be said with confidence that compared to Mexico, there are fewer combination products on the market in other Latin American countries. We have reported only nine of the 20 products marketed with the use of CIMMYT germplasm (products developed by our collaborators) in Latin America outside of Mexico, while in Mexico there are more than 50 products.The number of institutions involved in the development and commercialization of products using CIMMYT germplasm is also very different, since in Latin American countries outside of Mexico there are approximately five such institutions, while in Mexico there are more than ten companies that have breeding programs actively using CIMMYT lines to develop and release new hybrids.Additionally, it is to be noted that CIMMYT in Mexico has a much more active engagement with the private sector compared to many other Latin American countries, where the leadership has been maintained by public research institutions. That is to say, in Latin American countries outside of Mexico, commercialization of CIMMYT products is achieved through allocation of CIMMYT products to these public-sector institutions, who then register and sub-license them to commercial partners, whereas in Mexico, CIMMYT works directly with private-sector partners.The foregoing examples demonstrate that in recent years, in the case of Mexican seed companies, CIMMYT has strengthened its partnerships, contributing to accelerated varietal turnover in the Mexican market. Mexican seed SMEs' product portfolios became more dynamic as they benefited from CIMMYT's germplasm, and as they tried to compete and be efficient in placing their products on the market.It is noteworthy that the 10 companies analyzed for this document increased the number of products in their portfolio since 2014 (Figure 9). It is the four \"small\" companies that have the greatest number of products available and the largest growth in portfolio size, with an average of 10 products in 2014 to 17 by 2021, while medium-sized companies and micro-enterprises remained with the same number of products on average during the period 2014 to 2021. Medium-sized companies averaged 10 products each in 2014, only increasing to 13 products in 2021, while micro-small companies increased from an average of seven products each in 2014 to eight in 2021.If we compare Mexican companies with CIMMYT collaborators in other Latin American countries, it can be said in general that the product portfolio in Mexico was renewed, while elsewhere in Latin America, the CIMMYT products on the market tend to be extremely old. For example, the only CIMMYT hybrid in the top five best-selling products was assigned in 1996, and the best-selling OPV was released in 2007.We hope that this situation may improve in the coming years through the licensing of new CIMMYT hybrids to Latin American partners in recent years. We expect that by 2026 new CIMMYT products will become widely available across Latin American markets and begin to replace older, less advantageous products. The companies of the Consortium, that is, the Mexican ones, in addition to increasing their sales volume, have also increased the number of states and municipalities of the Mexican Republic where they sell. The states with the highest sales in 2021 were Jalisco, Michoacán, Guerrero, Chiapas and Sinaloa.In 2021, hybrids with CIMMYT germplasm were sold in at least 24 of the 32 states in the country and in more than 500 municipalities. Hybrids with CIMMYT germplasm have achieved a presence in the main maize-producing states of the Mexican Republic and with mature improved seed markets, such as Jalisco, Sinaloa and El Bajío; and they are also present in markets with low adoption of hybrids such as Guerrero and Oaxaca. In specific reference to 100% CIMMYT hybrids (those developed by CIMMYT breeding programs), these are also present in at least 20 states of Mexico and in at least 400 municipalities.We highlight that the presence of hybrids with new CIMMYT germplasm has been growing, as can be seen in Figure 9 and Figure 10. If we compare these two maps (one from 2014 and the other from 2020), we can see a growing number of municipalities with sales of materials with CIMMYT germplasm over the years, for example in the states of Oaxaca, Guerrero, Colima, Guanajuato, Michoacan, etc. It should be mentioned that CIMMYT programs target rainfed farms, hence the growth of sales with CIMMYT germplasm towards the center and south of the country, and not towards the north where the irrigated maize seed market predominates.The Consortium seed companies had an estimated impact on a total of 940,414 hectares in 2021, assuming an average planting density of one bag per hectare (one bag sold equal to one hectare of impact), of which at least 213,472 hectares correspond to bags reported with CIMMYT germplasm; the remainder corresponds to private germplasm, or products whose pedigree was not reported.Regarding the sample of ten companies analyzed, the medium-sized companies had a presence in at least ten states, the small ones varied from seven to eleven, and the micro-companies from three to seven. Of course, it is the medium-sized companies that reach more competitive markets such as Sinaloa, but they are also in other northern states such as Durango and Coahuila. The micro companies can have a presence in markets that are more complicated in logistical terms and the size of the land of the maize farmers, having a presence in areas that are less accessible to larger companies. Several states, such as Campeche, Chiapas, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Jalisco, State of Mexico, among others, host a variety of companies of varying sizes. Larger companies have the advantage of being able to reach markets that are more competitive in terms of product performance due to the participation of transnational companies, but the limitation of not reaching complex markets where smaller companies are able to carve out specialized niches. Regarding marketing channels, information was collected from six of the 10 companies in this study (three micro-small companies, one small, and two medium-sized). In this regard, agro-service stores are the most important marketing channel with a percentage that exceeds 55%, and in second place government sales, exceeding levels of 15%. Medium-sized companies are the least dependent on the government, and therefore, they do not have the limitation of receiving payment for their seed subject to the timelines and budget approvals of the government sector.The biggest challenge for companies has been and continues to be the implementation of marketing strategies. Many of them, in fact, recognize that they do not have a defined strategy, and that the annual routine of seed production and sale overrides any strategic planning to reach or maintain new markets.In fact, they do not know what their main distribution channel is going to be from season to the next, making it impossible to implement campaigns or direct products to marketing channels or clients that could generate the greatest revenue.The most common activities are establishing demonstration plots and hosting field days, where companies show off the benefits of their seed products to a significant number of farmers, and distribute promotional materials such as brochures, caps, pens, etc. However, there is no follow-up with these new farmers who show interest in their seed, nor concerted attempts to target farmers with the power to convince other grain producers. In reality, the least frequent activities are the establishment of commercial plots with \"witness\" clients to show the results of their seeds with neighboring farmers, and in itself, it highlights the lack of seed promotion activities at the final point of sale with the farmers, agroservices or with the client grain producers of these agro-servicesIn fact, many companies are unaware of the behavior of their hybrids planted in the fields of their grain producing customers. After placing their seed in the agro-service store, the seed companies have no feedback mechanism to know what happens after the sale of their seed. As a result, seed companies struggle even to know where the seed went, much less if it worked.In general, companies lack market information and the ability to generate this information, and therefore lack territory planning strategies, and medium-and long-term marketing strategies.The analysis presented in this document indicates that Mexican seed companies have some strengths or limitations that are related to their size, and others that they all share, regardless of their size.The dependency on germplasm from non-profit institutions (CIMMYT or other public research institutions) represents a limitation for smaller companies (micro -small and small companies). Larger companies have the advantage of resources to generate their own products through in-house breeding programs, making them less dependent. This can be extrapolated to companies across Latin America, since the smallest ones do not have breeding programs and therefore depend on public research institutions. However, the existence of improvement programs such as those of CIMMYT mean that micro or small businesses have access to competitive hybrids, as long as there is financing for the development of germplasm, was the case for Mexico from 2011 to 2020. Therefore, availability of germplasm ceased to represent barrier for Mexican companies to enter the market; as long as they continue to maintain said access this will be the case and ensure genetic diversity in the seed marketplace, and smaller companies will be able to hold their own against their larger competitors, since CIMMYT's germplasm has proven to be competitive both in terms of yield and agronomic traits. Nonetheless, dependence on public or CGIAR germplasm is a risk factor especially for smaller companies, considering the volatility of public and philanthropic sources of funding for these breeding programs 4 .However, for many Mexican companies CIMMYT has become an enormously important source of germplasm, largely due to the boost provided by the MasAgro and Maize for Mexico projects, by providing resources to CIMMYT from 2010 to 2020 for the generation of tropical, subtropical and highland hybrids and parental lines, among other activities. This strengthened the companies by allowing them to diversify their portfolios and increase the number of products available to Mexican farmers. Although, as previously mentioned, the larger the size, the greater the number of self-developed products generated by the companies. This was not the case for our other Latin American collaborators outside of Mexico, who did not benefit from a robust, targeted breeding program for their own country; although they have access to CIMMYT products, those which remain today the most prevalent are from the 1990s or early 2000s and are no longer the most competitive. Resources are required to promote their replacement.Another risk factor, particularly for the smallest companies, is when they rely on sales to the government. Yes, it is relatively easy to sell to governments, since marketing strategies and product positioning are not required, but it is also common for payments to be delayed or even incomplete, which of course may lead to problems of liquidity for the company. In addition, there is no guarantee that it will be sold every year, nor that any brand loyalty be generated with the grain producers. This dependency can affect both medium-sized and smaller companies, but it depends on the companies themselves to diversify their customer base. Sales to the government represent opportunities, but dependency should never be created. In fact, one of the companies analyzed in this document went from being a small business in 2020 to a microbusiness in 2021, for not having been able to maintain its sales to the Mexican government.The market scope is another element that is influenced by the size of the company: medium-sized companies reach more competitive markets (such as Sinaloa in Mexico) as well as northern states such as Durango, and Coahuila; but the micro-enterprises, due to their locations, can have a presence in more complicated markets in terms of logistics and land size of grain producers, having a presence where the medium-sized ones do not reach as easily. Larger companies have the advantage of being able to reach the most competitive markets (especially those which are also targets of transnational companies and where only the highest-performing products survive), but the limitation of not reaching smaller, more complex markets. Therefore, government programs have a great opportunity in smaller companies, as they are able to access places that require more work, since they are more remote and populated by farmers with fewer resources and less land. Or, where appropriate, governments may consider offering incentives for medium-sized companies to go to these markets that may not currently be of interest to them.Finally, marketing is a weakness for many seed companies, who often do not have a well-defined business strategy, may be unaware of their distribution channels, and may have no strategies for targeting or maintaining the most profitable customers. For example, there is no follow-up by seed companies to get feedback from the end users of their products, such that they even do not know the places where their seed was finally planted or how it performed. Companies choose to prioritize day-to-day activities, and do not place value nor invest in commercial strategies or brand or product positioning. It is not so easy to convince grain producers to adopt a new product, even if the one they currently plant has great agronomic or yield disadvantages compared to a new product; all the more reason why companies need to invest more in their marketing strategies.In the case of Mexico, the country's problems are great, despite being among the ten world leaders in maize production, with a cultivated area of approximately 7.3 million hectares and an annual production of 22 million tons (SIAP, 2021). Even so, the country relies heavily on imports to meet its domestic grain consumption needs, mainly yellow corn for animal feed and industrial uses. Nonetheless, white-grain maize continues to dominate the Mexican seed market. Though yields across the country can be significantly improved, it is not that Mexican companies do not have access to competitive products, as demonstrated throughout this document; indeed they do. The same cannot be said for collaborators in other Latin American countries, who have not benefitted from robust, country-focused projects aiming to replace obsolete products that continue to persist and even prevail in their national seed markets.We have also highlighted that CIMMYT continues to be a pillar for the Mexican seed industry, given that most national companies do not have sufficient resources to develop their own research in germplasm generation, and even those that have achieved or maintained their improvement programs, make use of CIMMYT lines for the development of new hybrids.It is true that investment in breeding programs such as those of CIMMYT, where hybrids or parental lines are efficiently released, have allowed the strengthening of Mexican seed companies, accelerating the development of new products and their commercialization in the market. In the last ten years, CIMMYT has developed and released dozens of final products (hybrids or OPVs), including at least 45 that have been marketed in Mexico between 2012 and 2021; therefore, CIMMYT's lines and final products continue to represent an opportunity for companies not only from Mexico but also from other Latin American countries to continue or modernize their seed supply, expand their sales and market share.The participating companies of the Maize Seed Consortium in Mexico, including the 10 companies analyzed for this document, have responded satisfactorily by successfully introducing the new CIMMYT hybrids in their offer or CIMMYT lines within their portfolio, maintaining a more diverse and renovated seed portfolio. In the case of many other Latin American countries, unfortunately, the portfolio is not so diverse, and the renewal of products is urgent.The growth of sales of CIMMYT hybrids in Mexico has been relatively constant since 2012 when they were first made available on the market (macroeconomic fluctuations notwithstanding). Likewise, the number of products (final hybrids) available to companies, the number of companies that market them and the commercial products available to the farmer have grown.Therefore, the availability and supply of products is not the problem in Mexico, but there are challenges with regards to the marketing capacities of small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (lack of commercial planning, planning of territories, brand positioning and products with final producers, among others) which limitations the country's ability to achieve self-sufficiency. Furthermore, the tendency of some companies to rely on sales to the federal government generates high volatility in their sales and also in their liquidity.This marketing weakness has been the great limitation of Mexican companies to influence those markets with lowest yields, dominated by smallholder farms and stress-prone environments. Therefore, in addition to maintaining a constant flow of competitive germplasm, there is a need for projects and programs that help seed SMEs improve their capacities in marketing and develop commercial strategies to reach complex and remote markets and improve the maize production in Mexico. Many other Latin American countries are a step behind: national companies need to inject new germplasm and, of course, also invest in generating demand for it."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2481150436.json b/main/part_2/2481150436.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f19299e17dce202b4d59d18047c7a15edbd2dabb --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2481150436.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"941e063caa0d61f4a731edea4104a2e5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6691d8c5-c0ee-477e-b329-081f66886f8b/retrieve","id":"389939294"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"76f00bfe-d66b-4c79-8edd-2563adc859ae","content":"El éxito de las iniciativas de adaptación y mitigación al cambio climático dependen de la comprensión de la población en torno a este fenómeno. » El conocimiento, las actitudes y en general las percepciones sobre el cambio climático se consideran variables predictoras de los comportamientos ambientales. » Los futuros científicos, legisladores, consumidores y votantes, tendrán que tomar decisiones políticas complejas sobre el cambio climático y tendrán que hacerlo desde una perspectiva informada, razón por la cual los estudiantes de educación superior son una importante fuente de información.Identificar los conocimientos, actitudes y comportamientos ambientales en los estudiantes de educación superior en Colombia (COL) y Nicaragua (NIC) y establecer si se presentan relaciones entre éstas variables y las características sociodemográficas.» Se encontraron diferencias significativas en los conocimientos sobre el cambio climático entre los estudiantes que finalizaban su etapa universitaria y los que la iniciaban. Esto evidencia el efecto del proceso educativo en la apropiación del cambio climático.» Para ambos países, el entendimiento del cambio climático fue mayor en hombres que en mujeres, sin embargo, las diferencias fueron muy estrechas. En contraste, las mujeres presentaron mejores comportamientos que los hombres. Las diferencias fueron significativas para COL, pero no para NIC.» No se presentaron diferencias significativas en los conocimientos del cambio climático por estrato socioeconómico (COL) o nivel de ingreso (NIC).» A pesar de encontrar débiles correlaciones, los resultados son consistentes con la idea de que mayores conocimientos sobre el cambio climático y el medio ambiente permiten a los individuos asumir mejores comportamientos ambientales.» El compromiso con las acciones ambientales presentaron variaciones de acuerdo a la rigidez de las acciones: a pesar de que el beneficio social de determinada acción ambiental sea mayor al costo individual, el agente puede preferir no realizarla dado que el beneficio privado es menor a su costo (esfuerzo/sacrificio al realizar la acción). » Una encuesta tipo Likert de cinco puntos fue aplicada en 10 ciudades de COL (n=4759) y en 4 de NIC (n=2354). La muestra fue seleccionada a través de un muestreo por etapas.» Se calculó un índice para cada variable otorgando puntajes a las respuestas correctas. A continuación se utilizó el Coeficiente de correlación de Spearman, la prueba ANOVA y el estadístico t student para establecer las relaciones entre las variables descritas. El test de Tukey fue utilizado para identificar en qué grupos se presentaban diferencias.Póster presentado en:Díaz, Manuel Francisco 1 ; Enciso, Karen 1 ; Sellitti, Stefania 2 ; Ruzzante, Matteo 3 ; Burkart, Stefan » Las ciudades capitales presentaron la mayor proporción de estudiantes con un adecuado entendimiento del cambio climático y la menor con falencias en la comprensión de dicho fenómeno.» Se observa una débil relación entre los conocimientos sobre el cambio climático y los comportamientos ambientales para ambos países. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2491380307.json b/main/part_2/2491380307.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..770902f755bc54550dba8bf0e05382b8f5d2e3f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2491380307.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3ef3382ff2b4d7d9c968a098049d122d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7cae621d-2587-44f5-9065-4e410126149b/retrieve","id":"945938090"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"786f2d18-1f49-426b-a282-eb410648b646","content":"Our goal is to help ensure that seeds and plants are effectively and efficiently conserved and made available for future use. To achieve this, genebank managers and genebank staff need to have guidelines which help them managing a genebank.Until now guidelines on genebank management for different crops were hard to find. Genebank managers of different research institutes were contacted and asked to share their published and unpublished knowledge. Information on crop specific genebank activities (steps and processes) for 9 crops (banana, barley, cassava, chickpea, forage grasses, forage legumes, maize, rice and wheat) were collected, standardized and edited into clear and well structured webpages.Turning a website into a useful tool Multimedia (photos and video) were added to enhance the content and potential for learning. The knowledge base website also contains many interactive items such as flipbooks (series of clickable pictures), presentations, tutorials, a forum, a blog, a wiki, e-learning materials and many links, and can also be used as a training tool.This website is built using the free Joomla content management system (CMS). This CMS allows users of this website to register and participate in developing or updating content or making comments. This important feature makes it easy to add information on new genebank management practices and new crops. Tutorials that explain how to do this are included on the website.• Collaboration amongst key crop experts is vital. • Champions helped to motivate others to contribute.• The use of visual content makes it more user friendly.• Establish collaboration mechanisms with curators of national and international genebanks for regular updates of information including addition of best practices for other crops. • Establish feedback mechanisms from users to improve the usefulness and use of shared platforms. • Expand the site linking other practices and guidelines for genebank management such as quality assurance standards. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2504667610.json b/main/part_2/2504667610.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b6595100e9050dd497f91defc24f1fc8b7358f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2504667610.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"83c0cd93a2a03bf7d4ca93edc8ea0f06","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1f281b17-12d7-4518-8e48-fa9984f60bb0/retrieve","id":"1510511427"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"51d2e8e0-86dd-45e3-9175-33704d2b3a20","content":"Currently, there are a number of tools aimed to remotely deploy traits associated with forage quantity and quality in pastures and grasslands. Such information is important for pasture and livestock management and relevant for screening purposes of large number of genotypes. Previous research has shown the implementation of proximal sensing for screening purposes in Urochloa grasses. Nowadays, the use of Unmanned Aerial Systems (drones) are increasingly being used for the same purposes but at larger spatial scales. Multispectral images or spectral sensors can be used to calculate a number of vegetation indexes that are associated with forage quantity and quality. Among them, NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) is probably the most widely used. Values of NDVI close to 0 represent mostly bare soil or very low vegetation, whereas values close to 1 represent vigorous plants (green and vigorous plants).One of the largest problems in the determination of forage quantity and quality is that they are highly dynamic, they change over development of the plants, and are sensitive to external stresses and management (e.g. cutting intervals). The use of vegetation indexes can be used to track changes of forage as a way to support pasture management. Traditionally, pasture management in the tropics rely on visual inspections of height of plants. Height is an important parameter, particularly to manage rotational grazing where forages are clipped to a target height as a way to manage maturity, nutrient concentration and forage digestibility. Less often, samples of forage biomass are taken to estimate productivity of the pasture and its livestock carrying capacity. Thereby, the objective of this work was to test the feasibility of use of NDVI as a proxy for parameters relevant for pasture management such as height and biomass. Plant material consisted of three Urochloa spp. Cultivars (Marandu, Mulato 2 and Tully). Cultivars Marandu and Mulato 2 form tussocks, whereas cv. Tully is a strongly stoloniferous plant. Cultivars Marandu and Mulato form larger and taller plants than cv. Tully.  Plant material was established under field conditions at the regional campus of the Alliance Bioversity-CIAT in Palmira, Colombia in a three replicate complete randomize block. Each replicate consisted in 400m2 of planted material.  A standardization cut was applied at a height of 10 cm and then, cuts every 7 days for 17 weeks were performed within each replicate. To each genotype and replicate, four samples for fresh biomass were randomly sampled in an area of 0.25m 2 .  Every week, recording of plant height and NDVI with and active sensor (Greenseeker, Trimble, US) were performed at each sample size. Collection of NDVI from a modified RGB camera with the infrared filter removed (Mapir, Mapir, US), attached to a drone (Phantom IV, DJI, China) were collected at midday. NDVI from images was calculated to each replicate (400m 2 ). Figure 1 summarizes the obtained results.  Overall three growth stages were recognized: 1) weeks 1 to 6: period of greater leaf growth and moderate stem elongation; 2) weeks 6 to 12: period of elongation of tillers and leaves; 3) weeks 12 to 15: flowering and 4) weeks 15 to 17: seed ripening accompanied by senescence of older leaves.  The results showed that NDVI obtained from active sensor or image resembled the time courses changes in biomass and height during early growth (weeks 1 to 6). This suggests that the use of NDVI can be used as a proxy for biomass or height at these (first 6 weeks after cutting or grazing), but not at later stages.  Albeit the sensitivity of NDVI from images was lower than NDVI from active sensor, NDVI from images as a management tool might be more attractive for their use under larger spatial scales (e.g. a UAS can cover an area of 9 ha with a single flight).  Efforts to further expand the use of remote sensing to estimate other forage traits of interest (i.e., crude protein, in vitro dry matter digestibility) are currently underway.  Barriers of this kind of technology uptake by neutral scale livestock producers is currently studied across several regions in Colombia"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2505959978.json b/main/part_2/2505959978.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..098bf0f735b11059a6ad0b099ce4889cf75d95a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2505959978.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6d9a7c95d351758d358d67c03a626d55","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/81955b04-8692-45ce-bc29-e97432c6153f/retrieve","id":"1823458747"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"91a9f56d-1752-4cd8-b567-2dce3072477d","content":"This paper introduces Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (RAAIS). RAAIS is a diagnostic tool that can guide the analysis of complex agricultural problems and innovation capacity of the agricultural system in which the complex agricultural problem is embedded. RAAIS focuses on the integrated analysis of different dimensions of problems (e.g. biophysical, technological, socio-cultural, economic, institutional and political), interactions across different levels (e.g. national, regional, local), and the constraints and interests of different stakeholder groups (farmers, government, researchers, etc.). Innovation capacity in the agricultural system is studied by analysing (1) constraints within the institutional, sectoral and technological subsystems of the agricultural system, and (2) the existence and performance of the agricultural innovation support system. RAAIS combines multiple qualitative and quantitative methods, and insider (stakeholders) and outsider (researchers) analyses which allow for critical triangulation and validation of the gathered data. Such an analysis can provide specific entry points for innovations to address the complex agricultural problem under study, and generic entry points for innovation related to strengthening the innovation capacity of agricultural system and the functioning of the agricultural innovation support system. The application of RAAIS to analyse parasitic weed problems in the rice sector, conducted in Tanzania and Benin, demonstrates the potential of the diagnostic tool and provides recommendations for its further development and use.The Agricultural Innovation System (AIS) approach has become increasingly popular as a framework to analyse, and explore solutions to, complex agricultural problems (e.g. Hall et al., 2003;World Bank, 2006). The AIS approach evolved from a transition from technology-oriented approaches, to more systems-oriented approaches to agricultural innovation (e.g. Klerkx et al., 2012a). Within the AIS approach, innovation is perceived as a process of combined technological (e.g. cultivars, fertilizer, agronomic practices) and non-technological (e.g. social practices such as labour organi-zation or institutional settings such as land-tenure arrangements) changes (Hounkonnou et al., 2012;Leeuwis, 2004). Such changes occur across different levels (e.g. field, farm, region), and are shaped by interactions between stakeholders and organisations inside and outside the agricultural sector (Kilelu et al., 2013;Klerkx et al., 2010).Adopting an AIS approach to study complex agricultural problems has important implications for research. First, it requires an analysis that acknowledges and integrates the different dimensions, levels and stakeholders' interests associated with the problem under review. Second, it necessitates a holistic understanding of the innovation capacity of the agricultural system in which the complex problem is embedded (Hall, 2005). Third, it requires insight in the structural conditions provided by the agricultural innovation support system that can enable or constrain innovation in the agricultural system (Klerkx et al., 2012b;World Bank, 2006). Fourth, it requires a thorough understanding of the interactions between complex agricultural problems, innovation capacity in the agricultural system and the agricultural innovation support system.Despite the recent development and application of a variety of methods that can support AIS analyses (e.g. World Bank, 2012), the potential of the AIS approach to address complex agricultural problems remains underutilized in many fields of study (e.g. Schut et al., 2014a). Four main reasons for this were identified. First, methods used for the analysis of complex agricultural problems generally have a narrow focus, rather than a holistic view. They support the analysis of a specific dimension (e.g. the economic dimension in Beintema et al., 2012), level (e.g. the national level in Temel et al., 2003), or stakeholder group (e.g. farmers in Amankwah et al., 2012;Totin et al., 2012). Second, studies that do include analysis of multiple dimensions of problems (e.g. Singh et al., 2009), interactions across different levels (e.g. Douthwaite et al., 2003) or multi-stakeholder dynamics (e.g. Hermans et al., 2013) often have limited attention for the integrated analysis of these features of complex agricultural problems. Third, studies that integrate the analysis of multiple dimensions of problems, interactions across different levels and multi-stakeholder dynamics (e.g. Lundy et al., 2005;van Ittersum et al., 2008) have limited attention for understanding innovation capacity in the agricultural system and the functioning of the agricultural innovation support system. A fourth reason is that the majority of AIS studies are conducted ex-post (e.g. Basu and Leeuwis, 2012), lack a clear structure to delineate system's boundaries (Klerkx et al., 2012b), or are based on comprehensive studies which take considerable time (e.g. Jiggins, 2012). Although such studies provide a better understanding of the drivers of innovation in agricultural systems, their diagnostic ability to identify entry points for innovation to overcome complex agricultural problems is limited.Based on the above review of the availability, scope and use of methods for AIS analyses, we have developed and tested a diagnostic tool that can support the Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (RAAIS). RAAIS fits within a tradition of 'rapid appraisal approaches' used in the field of agriculture, including the Participatory (Rapid) Rural Appraisal (Chambers, 1994), Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Knowledge Systems (RAAKS: Engel, 1995) and the Rapid Appraisal of Potato Innovation Systems (Ortiz et al., 2013). RAAIS integrates and builds upon existing (agricultural) innovation system concepts and combines multiple methods of data collection. The objectives of RAAIS are to provide a coherent set of (1) specific entry points for innovation to address complex agricultural problems, and (2) generic entry points that can enhance innovation capacity of the agricultural system and the performance of the agricultural innovation support system. The aim of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework (Section 2) and a methodological framework (Section 3) for RAAIS. Based on its application in a study on parasitic weeds in rice production in Tanzania and Benin, we reflect on the extent to which RAAIS is able to meet its objectives, and provide recommendations for further development and use of RAAIS (Section 4), followed by the main conclusions (Section 5).The agricultural innovation system -including both the agricultural system and its innovation capacity and the agricultural innovation support system -may be very good at tackling some complex agricultural problems, but may be incapable to deal with others (Hung and Whittington, 2011;Markard and Truffer, 2008). It underlines that understanding complex agricultural problems, innovation capacity in the agricultural system, and the functioning of the agricultural innovation support system requires integrative analysis. Despite of their interrelated character, we deem it useful for analytical purposes to first address them separately (Sections 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3), before showing their embeddedness (Section 2.4).Complex agricultural problems are defined as problems (1) that have multiple dimensions (Schut et al., 2014b), (2) that are embedded in interactions across different levels (Giller et al., 2008), and (3) where a multiplicity of actors and stakeholders are involved (Funtowicz and Ravetz, 1993). Regarding the first, complex agricultural problems are an interplay of biophysical, technological, social-cultural, economic, institutional and political dimensions.To exemplify this, we use a case by Sims et al. (2012), who analyse constraints for the upscaling of conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. They demonstrate how import taxes on steel, but not on imported agricultural machinery (institutional dimension), disadvantage manufacturers in developing locally adapted agricultural equipment such as no till planters (technological dimension) for effective soil conservation for sustainable crop management (biophysical dimension). Concerning the second, the dimensions of complex agricultural problems often have different implications across different levels. Mitigating the impact of agro-industrial biofuel production on food security, for instance, will require different strategies when approached at the national level (e.g. policies avoiding agro-industrial biofuel production in regions where pressure on agricultural land is already high) or at the farm household level (e.g. balancing the allocation of household labour to on-farm crop production and off-farm plantation work) (Schut and Florin, under review). Nevertheless, the different levels are interrelated, and consequently, coherent multi-level strategies are required. Regarding the third, complex agricultural problems are characterised by the involvement of a multitude of actors, stakeholders and the organisations they represent (Hounkonnou et al., 2012;Ortiz et al., 2013) (Table 1). Actors include about anyone that can be related directly or indirectly to a problem, or the potential solution. Stakeholders are those actors or actor groups with a vested interest in addressing the problem (McNie, 2007) and their participation in exploring solutions to complex agricultural problems is perceived as a critical success factor (e.g. Giller et al., 2011). Stakeholder participation can provide enhanced insights in the different dimensions of the problem, and the types of solutions that are both technically feasible, and socio-culturally and economically acceptable (Faysse, 2006). However, stakeholder groups are no homogeneous entities and often focus on their own, rather than a common, interest (Leeuwis, 2000). The agricultural system is defined as the \"operational unit of agriculture\" including all actors and organisations at local, regional and national levels involved in the production, processing and commercialization of agricultural commodities (Spedding, 1988). Consequently, innovation capacity in the agricultural system is defined as the ability of these actors and organisations to develop new and mobilise existing competences (including knowledge, skills and experiences) to continuously identify and prioritise constraints and opportunities for innovation in a dynamic systems context (Leeuwis et al., 2014).Following the typical system boundaries used in generic (i.e. nonagricultural) studies of innovation systems (Carlsson et al., 2002;Papaioannou et al., 2009;Wieczorek and Hekkert, 2012), we conceptualise the agricultural system as a combination of interrelated institutional, sectoral and technological subsystems. The institutional subsystem comprises different types of institutions, which are the formal and informal rules and structures that shape perspectives and practices (Leeuwis, 2004). In this paper we examine six types of institutions; policy, research, education and training, extension, markets and politics across different aggregation levels (e.g. national, regional or district) (e.g. Cooke et al., 1997;Freeman, 1988Freeman, , 1995)). The sectoral subsystem is defined around a commodity or segments of a value chain (e.g. rice or cocoa) (e.g. Blay-Palmer, 2005;Gildemacher et al., 2009). The analysis of the sectoral subsystem seeks to understand interactions between, for instance, access to credit, inputs and services, agricultural production, postharvest activities, trade, marketing and consumption related to the functioning of that value chain (e.g. Thitinunsomboon et al., 2008). Within the agricultural system, different sectoral subsystems can exist and interact. Technological subsystems are defined around an existing or novel technology (e.g. irrigation, mechanised weeding) or field of knowledge (e.g. integrated pest management) to address a particular problem that may well cut across different sectoral subsystems (Carlsson and Stankiewicz, 1991;Chung, 2012;Hekkert et al., 2007).The agricultural innovation support system provides the structural conditions that can enable (when present) or constrain (when absent or malfunctioning) innovation within the agricultural system and its subsystems (Klein Woolthuis et al., 2005;van Mierlo et al., 2010;Wieczorek and Hekkert, 2012) (Table 2). Structural conditions include (1) adequate knowledge infrastructure in the form of research, education and extension, physical infrastructure and assets such as roads and vehicles, and functional communication and finance structures, (2) institutions comprise clear regulatory frameworks and their proper implementation and enforcement, (3) interaction and collaboration between multiple stakeholders in the agricultural system, and (4) stakeholder capacities (e.g. literacy and entrepreneurship) and adequate human and financial resources (e.g. number of extension officers and funds for their backstopping). The analysis of the presence and functioning of these structural conditions contributes to a better understanding of what constraints or enables innovation capacity in the agricultural system (e.g. limited multi-stakeholder collaboration), as well as how the structural conditions provided by the agricultural innovation support system stimulate or hamper this (e.g. incentive structures for different stakeholder groups to collaborate).The set-up of the agricultural innovation support system may be good at supporting incremental 'system optimisation' that reproduce the current state of affairs, but less good at supporting 'system transformation' that can lead to radical innovations. For example, the presence of an effective top-down, technology-oriented agricultural extension system can enable the dissemination of crop protection solutions through a technology transfer approach. However, the existence of this system can form a constraint for the promotion of agro-ecological approaches through participatory, farmer-led experiments. Consequently, to achieve system transformation, both the agricultural system and the agricultural innovation support system should undergo continuous adaptation (Hall et al., 2004;Spielman, 2005).The integrated analysis of complex agricultural problems, innovation capacity of the agricultural system and the performance of the agricultural innovation support system can provide a coherent set of specific and generic entry points for innovation (Fig. 1). Specific entry points for innovations relate to those innovations that directly contribute to addressing the complex agricultural problem under study. Generic entry points for innovation related to strengthening the innovation capacity of agricultural system and the functioning of the agricultural innovation support system. For example, to reduce fruit waste in developing countries, existing technologies for conserving fruits can be adapted to fit the local context (specific entry point for innovation of the technological subsystem). This may trigger access to export markets (specific entry point for innovation of the sectoral subsystem) and require certification policies to supply such fruit export markets (specific entry point for innovation of the institutional subsystem). To support the development, implementation and enforcement of certification policies, the establishment of a national agricultural certification bureau may be required (generic entry point for innovation). The existence of such a bureau can provide an incentive for investing in the export of other agricultural products, for instance, vegetables, that, in turn, can trigger the development or adaptation of conservation technologies to reduce vegetable waste. The above example shows how structural adaptations of the agricultural innovation support system can enhance innovation capacity to addressing the complex agricultural problem under review (fruit waste), but can also have a spillover effect on addressing other complex agricultural problems (vegetable waste). Furthermore, the agricultural innovation support system can provide conditions that support innovation in the agricultural sector more generally, for instance through innovation policy or funding schemes that affect multiple institutional, sectoral and technological subsystems.RAAIS is a diagnostic tool that combines multiple methods of data collection. Building on existing experiences with rapid appraisal approaches and (participatory) innovation systems analysis, five criteria for the selection of methods have been identified.1. Methods should be diverse, rigorous, and be able to generate both qualitative and quantitative data. This enhances the credibility and strength of the analysis (Spielman, 2005). Qualitative data provide the basis for the identification and analysis of the different dimensions of complex agricultural problems, and structural conditions enabling or constraining the innovation capacity. Such data may also provide narratives regarding the underlying causes and historical evolution of constraints. Quantitative data analysis can build on this by providing (descriptive) statistics and trends on, for instance, the distribution of constraints across different levels, stakeholder groups or study sites. 2. Methods should facilitate both 'insider' and 'outsider' analysis.Insider analysis implies data analysis by stakeholders who can provide highly detailed explanations of specific phenomena based on their knowledge and experiences. However, insiders such as farmers or policymakers often have an incomplete or insufficient critical view of the broader agricultural system or the agricultural innovation support system. Consequently, it is important to complement insider analysis by outsider analysis of data by researchers (van Mierlo et al., 2010). By combining insider and outsider analysis, the delineation of the systems boundaries is done in a participatory way, by stakeholders and researchers. 3. Methods should be able to target different stakeholder groups across different levels. When studying complex agricultural problems, it is essential to include different groups of stakeholders, their perceptions on what constitutes the problem, and what are perceived feasible or desirable solutions (Faysse, 2006;Ortiz et al., 2013). 4. Methods should be able to target stakeholders individually, in homogeneous groups and in heterogeneous groups so as to capture individual, group and multi-stakeholder perceptions on problems and solutions. Discussion and debate in both homogeneous and heterogeneous stakeholder groups generally provide a rich analysis of complex problems and potential solutions. Furthermore, multi-stakeholder interaction may reveal asymmetric power-relationships that are necessary to understand innovation capacity in the agricultural system. On the other hand, power-relationships, group pressure, or mutual dependencies between stakeholders may result in situations where sensitive Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the dynamic interactions between complex agricultural problems (multiple dimensions, multi-level interactions and multi-stakeholder dynamics), innovation capacity of the agricultural system (including its institutional, sectoral and technological subsystems), and the structural conditions within the agricultural innovation support system that can enable or constrain innovation capacity in the agricultural system (infrastructure and assets, institutions, interaction and collaboration, and capabilities and resources). RAAIS provides insight into the current state of the system (on the left). RAAIS provides specific and generic entry points for innovation that can guide a transition towards the desirable state of the system (on the right) in which the complex agricultural problem is addressed, and the innovation capacity in the agricultural system has increased. Generic entry points for innovation can have a spill-over effect in terms of addressing other complex agricultural problems than the one under review.questions are avoided, or receive socially desirable responses. Methods that target stakeholders individually are more likely to provide insights in such questions (International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2014). 5. Methods together should provide sufficient detail on the complex agricultural problem under review, the innovation capacity in the agricultural system, and the functioning of the agricultural innovation support system (World Bank, 2012).Combining different types of methods and data collection techniques provides an opportunity to triangulate and validate data. Depending on the nature of the agricultural problem under review and the available resources and time, different types of data collection methods can be used for RAAIS, taking into account the above criteria for method selection.Based on the five criteria, four complementary methods for data collection were selected to be part of RAAIS (Table 3).Multi-stakeholder workshops mainly focused on the insider analyses of innovation capacity in the agricultural system and the structural conditions provided by the agricultural innovation support system. A participatory workshop methodology facilitates different groups of stakeholders to -individually and in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups -identify, categorise and analyse constraints for innovation in the agricultural system. Depending on the type of problem, workshops can be organised with stakeholders representing national, regional and/or district levels or, for instance, across different study sites where a specific problem is eminent. To keep the workshops manageable, and to stimulate interaction and debate, the participation of a maximum of 25 participants per workshop is proposed; for instance consisting of five representatives of the five different stakeholder groups in Table 1. As much as possible, each group should be a representative sample with respect to, for instance, gender, age, income, or ethnic groups. The workshops should be held in the language that all participants speak, and be facilitated by someone who is familiar with the cultural norms, has affinity with the problem, and understands the realities of the different stakeholder groups. The proposed workshop methodology consists of 13 Sessions subdivided into three categories, with each their own focus: (1) identifying constraints, (2) categorising constraints, and (3) exploring specific and generic entry points for innovation. Figure 2 and Table 4 provide an overview of the 13 Sessions, their sequence and relations, and their specific objective in RAAIS.Workshops are designed to take approximately 1 day. Besides the facilitator, a note-taker documents the outcome of the different sessions and captures discussions among participants. Workshop facilitation and note-taking protocols ensure that the workshop organisation, facilitation and documentation is standardized, which is essential for comparing or aggregating the outcomes, for instance, across different study sites.A crucial element in the workshops is the use of coloured cards. At the start of the workshop (Session 1), each of the stakeholder groups is assigned a different colour. During Session 2, each participant individually lists five constraints or challenges they face in their work and writes them down on their coloured cards. If five stakeholder groups are equally represented, this results in 125 cards. During Session 3, the participants discuss within their stakeholder groups the listed constraints, explore overlapping issues and jointly develop a stakeholder group top-5. If necessary, constraints can be reformulated based on discussions within the group. Each of the stakeholder groups use their top-5 throughout the rest of the The use of the coloured cards facilitates the analysis of different sessions during and after the workshops. As the cards are coded and recycled throughout the successive sessions, photographs can be taken to capture the results (for example Photo 1 and 4). Such photographs can be analysed after the workshop, and can also be used to validate the note-taker's data. Furthermore, the cards provide insight into the relations between constraints identified by different stakeholder groups (Photo 2 and 3). Combining the results from different sessions can stimulate integrative analyses, for instance, combining data resulting from Sessions 5 and 6 provides insight in the structural conditions for innovation across different levels. Similarly, the outcome of Sessions 7 and 11 can be compared to triangulate the data, as both seek to identify key constraints for innovation in the agricultural system.To guide the semi-structured interviews, a topic list is prepared and fine-tuned for each interview. Using a topic list provides a degree of flexibility to identify and to anticipate interesting storylines related to the problem under review, and allows validation of data that was gathered during previous interviews or during the workshops. Interviews should take a maximum of 1 hour, ensuring a high level of attentiveness of both the respondent as well as the interviewer. Sampling of interview respondents should follow a stratified approach, to ensure that stakeholders representing different study sites, different stakeholder groups, and different administrative levels are included. Within those strata, respondents can be selected purposive or based on snowball sampling where interview respondents make suggestions for who else should be included in the sample (Russell Bernard, 2006). The sample size can be based on the concept of \"saturation,\" or the point at which no new information or themes are observed in the interview data (Guest et al., 2006). Interviews can be recorded and transcribed electronically. From an ethical point of view, interviewees should give permission for interviews to be recorded, and researchers should ensure confidentiality of all interview data. Recording may not always be desirable, as the voice recorder can create a barrier between the researcher and the respondent, especially when it comes to discussing politically sensitive issues. Instead of recording, detailed notes can be taken and transcribed electronically. The transcribed interviews can be coded. Ideally, interviews are conducted and coded by two researchers, which will enhance the quality of the analysis.Based on the workshops and the interviews, some of the constraints may be eligible for broader study among specific groups of stakeholders through the use of surveys. Such surveys may provide more insights in, for example, the socio-economic impacts of climate change on smallholder agriculture in specific regions, the quality of agricultural extension received by farmers in addressing complex agricultural problems, or access to agricultural inputs for male or female headed households. Surveys are not necessarily limited to farmers, but can also be conducted with any of the other stakeholder groups involved. For the data to be complementary, surveys should be completed in the same study sites as where the workshops were organised and among a representative sample of the targeted stakeholder group. To achieve that, a stratified random sampling strategy can be used to identify respondents across different study sites, levels or stakeholder groups. A (efficient) sampling method that allows for optimal allocation of resources can be used to determine the sample size (e.g. Whitley and Ball, 2002).Secondary data are written data with relevance for the analysis of the complex agricultural problem, innovation capacity of the agricultural system or the functioning of the agricultural innovation support system. Examples are policy documents, project proposals and reports, laws or legal procedures, project evaluations, curricula for agricultural education and training, (agricultural) census and organisational records such as charts and budgets over a period of time. The sampling of secondary data is not clear cut. Key agricultural documents such as agricultural policies or agricultural research priorities should be included. These documents can refer to other relevant data. Furthermore, secondary data is often provided during, or following interviews. Insights from secondary data can be verified in interviews with stakeholders (e.g. the extent to which policy is implemented and enforced).We tested RAAIS through a case study aimed at analysing constraints and opportunities for innovation to effectively address parasitic weeds in rain-fed rice production systems in Tanzania (April-October 2012) and Benin (June-August 2013). The results from RAAIS in Tanzania are elaborated in Schut et al. (2014c). Data were gathered across national, zonal, regional and district levels. Multistakeholder workshops (with 68 participants in Tanzania and 66 participants in Benin) were organised in three study sites (districts) in Tanzania and Benin where parasitic weeds are eminent. In-depth interviews were held with representatives of national-, zonal-, regional-and district-level representatives of farmer cooperatives and associations, NGO/ civil society, private sector, government and research and training institutes (42 in Tanzania, 65 in Benin). Across the three study sites in the countries, a socio-economic farmer survey (152 in Tanzania, 182 in Benin) was held to study the impact of parasitic weeds on rain-fed rice farming (see N'cho et al., 2014 for more information). In Tanzania, a farmerextensionist survey (120 farmers, 30 agricultural extension officers) was held to explore the effectiveness of the national agricultural extension policy across the three study sites (see Daniel, 2013 for more information). Additionally, for both countries, secondary data including crop protection, extension and general agricultural policy, national research priorities, agricultural census and agricultural training curricula were analysed. Data gathering and initial analysis took around three months for each of the countries, and involved two researchers. We first conducted the in-depth interviews, followed • To ensure an equal representation of participants over the different stakeholder groupsParticipants individually identify five constraints they face in their work• To make an inventory of general constraints in the agricultural system faced by stakeholders 3. Developing a top-5 of constraints in stakeholder groupsParticipants (1) discuss constraints within respective stakeholder group;(2) develop an stakeholder group top-5 of constraints;(3) present the top-5 to other stakeholder groups; and (4) discuss within and between stakeholder group(s)• To gain insights in the key constraints in the agricultural system as faced by different stakeholder groups• To create awareness and stimulate learning among stakeholders Categorising constraintsParticipants (1) categorise top-5 constraints as policy-, research-, education and training-, extension-, markets-and/ or politics-related;(2) present results to the other groups; and (3) discuss within and between the stakeholder group(s)• To gain insights in how key constraints relate to the different types of institutions (institutional subsystem)• To create awareness and stimulate learning between stakeholdersParticipants (1) categorise top-5 constraints along the structural conditions drivers of innovation (Table 2); and (2) discuss within and between the stakeholder group(s)• To gain insights in how the stakeholder constraints relate to structural conditions provided agricultural innovation support system and whether these enable or constrain innovation capacity • To gain insights in how key constraints relate to different institutional (administrative) levels• To identify and analyse interactions between different levels • To create awareness and stimulate learning between stakeholdersParticipants (1) jointly discuss and identify relations between the different constraints;(2) identify constraints or challenges that are central in the analysis; and (3) discuss within and between the stakeholder group(s)• To analyse relationships between different constraints • To identify key constraints • To create awareness and stimulate learning between stakeholders • Identify generic entry points for enhancing the innovation capacity in the agricultural system 8. Categorising constraints along the sectoral subsystemParticipants (1) categorise stakeholder group top-5 constraints along the segments of the value chain; and (2) discuss within and between the stakeholder group(s)• To analyse constraints along the sectoral subsystem • To create awareness and stimulate learning between stakeholdersParticipants (1) categorise top-5 constraints along different technological or knowledge fields; and (2) discuss within and between the stakeholder group(s)• To analyse constraints along different technological subsystems • To identify constraints that require collaboration between stakeholder groups• To create awareness and stimulate learning between stakeholders • Identify entry points for innovation in the agricultural system 11. Exploring constraints that are easy/ difficult to solve Participants: (1) categorise top-5 constraints as relatively 'easy' or 'difficult' to address; and (2) discuss within and between the stakeholder group(s)• To explore which constraints require system optimisation (easy to address) and those that require system transformation (difficult to address)• To create awareness and stimulate learning between stakeholders • To triangulate data with Session 7 (are key constraints perceived to be easy/ difficult to address)• Identify entry points for enhancing the innovation capacity in the agricultural system 12. Exploring constraints that are structural/ operational Participants categorise top-5 constraints along a four-step gradient, ranging from 'very structural', 'structural', 'operational' and 'very operational' challenges and constraints• To distinguish between structural constraints that require specific innovation, and more structural problems that require generic innovation.• To create awareness and stimulate learning between stakeholders • To triangulate data with Sessions 7 and 11 (relation between key constraints how these are perceived by stakeholders)• Identify generic entry points for enhancing the innovation capacity in the agricultural system 13. Identifying priorities and solution strategiesParticipants (1) jointly discuss and develop an overall top-5 of constraints; and (2) jointly identify potential strategies to address these constraints• To explore opportunities for addressing systems constraints through multi-stakeholder collaboration• To explore similarities and differences with the key systems constraints identified in Session 7• Identify key entry points for innovation by the multi-stakeholder workshops. In Tanzania, both the socioeconomic farmer survey and the farmer-extensionist survey were held after the interviews and workshops. In Benin, the socioeconomic farmer survey was held preceding the in-depth interviews and workshops. Secondary data collection occurred throughout the fieldwork. Below, we will further reflect on the main objectives of RAAIS, as well as provide recommendations for further improvements and use of RAAIS, using our experiences from Tanzania and Benin.RAAIS contributed to an integrated understanding of different problem dimensions, multi-level interactions, and multi-stakeholder dynamics related to parasitic weed problems. With regard to the different problem dimensions, interviews demonstrated a potential relation between, for example, the preference for growing local, aromatic rice varieties (social-cultural dimension), the low capacity of farmer to purchase certified seeds (economic dimension), and the spread of parasitic weed seeds through the local rice seed system (technological dimension). Additionally, analysis of workshop data revealed how the untimely and insufficient availability of agricultural inputs provided by the government (institutional dimension) and limited interaction and collaboration among networks of key stakeholders (political dimensions) form additional bottlenecks for addressing such problems. It created awareness that describing and explaining complex agricultural problems, and exploring and designing solutions is unlikely to be successful if the different problem dimensions are analysed and treated separately (Hall and Clark, 2010;Spielman et al., 2009).Data gathering across different levels (national, region, and district level) enabled the analysis of the interactions and (mis)matches between different levels (Cash et al., 2006). An example that emerged during the workshops and the interviews is Tanzania's national export ban, that prohibits export of agricultural produce (e.g. of rice) as long as the country has not been declared 'food secure'. This national export ban influences local market prices, and consequently, also farmers' willingness and ability to invest in, for example, purchasing agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and seeds (e.g. Poulton et al., 2010). This, in turn, provided an opportunity to identify entry points for innovation across different levels, which has been identified as a critical factor for addressing complex agricultural problems (e.g. Giller et al., 2008Giller et al., , 2011)). As expected, and confirming previous reports (e.g. van Mierlo et al., 2010), the participatory analysis of multi-level interactions showed that stakeholders (insiders) often identify constraints at the level they represent (Schut et al., 2014c). This was complemented by our analysis as researchers (outsiders) of the multi-level interactions regarding the parasitic weed problems. The involvement of different groups of stakeholders was essential for enhancing the credibility, validity and quality of RAAIS, as well as for delineating the boundaries of the agricultural system and the agricultural innovation support system, which is considered a key challenge when using AIS approaches to analyse complex agricultural problems (Klerkx et al., 2012b). Furthermore, stakeholder participation provided a better understanding of the feasibility and acceptability of solutions for stakeholder groups. Although we believe that the stakeholder groups included in the testing of RAAIS (Table 1) provide a good starting point, other stakeholder groups (for instance the media) may be included in the sample (e.g. Ortiz et al., 2013) depending on the type of complex agricultural problem under review. The triangulation of data resulting from the different methods enabled us to validate findings, and to verify strategic communication by stakeholders, for instance, to verify how the extension system as described by policymakers in interviews, functioned in reality according to surveyed farmers.RAAIS demonstrates interactions between complex agricultural problems, innovation capacity of the agricultural systemconsisting of institutional, sectoral and technological subsystems -and the agricultural innovation support system. For example, applying fertilizer (technological subsystem) in rain-fed rice production is seen as a promising management strategy to reduce infection levels of Rhamphicarpa, one of the parasitic weeds involved in the study, and mitigate negative effects of the parasite on rice yields (Rodenburg et al., 2011). However, as was highlighted during the RAAIS workshops in both in Benin and in Tanzania, fertilizers are difficult to access in rural areas. In Benin, there is no well-developed private agro-dealer network and distribution infrastructure to support the supply of agricultural inputs. Furthermore, interviews showed that the public extension and input supply systems in Benin focus on the cotton sector, rather than on cereal crops (sectoral subsystems). In Tanzania, a private agro-dealer network and distribution infrastructure exists, but structures controlling the quality of fertilizers (institutional subsystem) are functioning sub-optimally according to interviewed government officials. In some areas, fake agro inputs are dominating the market, resulting in a limited trust and willingness to invest in applying fertilizer according to farmer representatives who participated in the workshops. The example shows how the absence or poor performance of fertilizer distribution infrastructure, limited farmer-extensionist interaction and lack of functional institutions for quality control (being structural conditions for innovation) constrain the innovation capacity in the agricultural systems and its technological (in this case fertilizer) and sectoral (the rice value chain) subsystems. Another example is based on secondary data analyses that demonstrated the lack of an operational strategy to address parasitic weeds in Tanzania and Benin. In both the interviews and workshops, stakeholders highlighted the general lack of interaction and collaboration between stakeholders in the agricultural sector (being a structural condition for innovation) as one of the main reasons for the absence or poor implementation of parasitic weed and other agricultural policies and strategies.The aforementioned examples demonstrate how RAAIS can support the identification of generic entry points for innovation. Such innovations can directly contribute to addressing the complex agricultural problem under review, but can also have a spill-over effect in terms of addressing broader constraints that hamper the innovation capacity in the agricultural system. For example, the lack of stakeholder interactions and collaboration in the agricultural system can provide an entry point for the adaptation of the structural conditions in the broader agricultural innovation support system, for example through investments in innovation brokers or multi-stakeholder platforms (Kilelu et al., 2013;Klerkx et al., 2010). Such structural adjustments can facilitate multi-stakeholder collaboration in tackling parasitic weed as well as other complex agricultural problems.Based on our experiences in Tanzania and Benin, we recommend conducting RAAIS in an interdisciplinary team of researchers with expertise on different dimensions of complex agricultural problems and on different data collection methods (Hulsebosch, 2001). Other suggestions include the experimentation with other combinations of methods, and on different types of complex agricultural problems. The workshop methodology could be made more interactive, in the sense of directly feeding back results of the sessions to participants to stimulate reflection and validate analyses during the workshops. Post-workshop surveys could provide additional insight into whether stakeholders felt they could freely raise and discuss their ideas and needs.The multi-stakeholder workshops, but also the surveys, presented a rather static picture of the complex agricultural problem under review and the innovation capacity of the agricultural system in which the problem is embedded. However, initial workshops and surveys could function as a baseline, to which future workshops and surveys can be compared. Other methods such as secondary data analysis or in-depth interviews present a more dynamic image of how, for example, collaborations between stakeholders evolve over the years. Our experiences in Tanzania and Benin show that ensuring social differentiation among workshop participants, interviewees and survey respondents (e.g. of different gender of age) was challenging, as, for example, the majority of workshop participants were male. Specific Workshop Sessions could have more attention for categorisation and priority setting by different gender or age groups. The facilitation of the multi-stakeholder workshops ensured that different stakeholder groups could raise and discuss their ideas (Hulsebosch, 2001). Despite such efforts, unequal power relations and differences in the ability to debate and negotiate that inherently exist between groups may have played a role. In line with our expectations, politically sensitive issues were more freely discussed in individual interviews as compared to multi-stakeholder setting.The combination of different methods of data collection was essential. In terms of the sequence of data collection, we recommend to first conduct and analyse the RAAIS multi-stakeholder workshops to identify constraints, and subsequently conduct the in-depth interviews and surveys that can provide more insight in the distribution and underlying root causes of these constraints. The workshops then provide a 'fast-track' approach to identifying entry points for innovation, that can subsequently be validated and explored in more detail using the in-depth interviews and stakeholder surveys. This would furthermore increase the 'rapidness' of RAAIS as a diagnostic tool.An updated version of the RAAIS multi-stakeholder workshops has been used to identify constraints, challenges and entry points for innovations related to the 'sustainable intensification of agricultural systems' in Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Nigeria and Cameroon under the CGIAR Research Programme for the Humid Tropics (Humidtropics) (Schut and Hinnou, 2014). Several of the recommendations made in this paper, including the revised sequence of methods for data collection and the use of post-workshop participant questionnaires, have been implemented and tested successfully. Some of the bottlenecks identified, such as social differentiation (e.g. gender and age groups) among workshop participants remained problematic and require further attention. At the end of the Humidtropics RAAIS workshops, participants developed action plans to address the prioritised constraints (Workshop Session 13). This required an extension of the workshops of half a day. The development and implementation of the action plans forms an important element for continued stakeholder collaboration in multi-stakeholder platforms.This paper demonstrates the potential of RAAIS as a diagnostic tool that can support and guide the integrated analysis of complex agricultural problems, innovation capacity in the agricultural system, and the performance of the agricultural innovation support system. RAAIS combines multiple qualitative and quantitative methods, and insider (stakeholders) and outsider (researchers) analyses which allow for critical triangulation and validation of the gathered data. Such an analysis can provide specific entry points for innovations to address the complex agricultural problem under study, and generic entry points for innovation related to strengthening the innovation capacity of agricultural system and the functioning of the agricultural innovation support system.Recommendations for further improvement include using RAAIS for the analysis of other types of complex agricultural problems, using other combinations of methods of data collection, and providing directly feedback to workshop participants to stimulate reflection and validate workshop outcomes. An adapted sequence of data collection methods in which workshops provide a 'fast-track' approach to identifying entry points for innovation, followed up by more indepth interviews and stakeholder surveys would increase the RAAIS' diagnostic capacity. The participatory development of concrete action plans based on RAAIS can provide a basis for continued multistakeholder collaboration to operationalise and implement specific and generic entry points for innovation."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2532832564.json b/main/part_2/2532832564.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1457253455a2a2b9332ef5dfda0c38ab8cf0faf5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2532832564.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4c62949cdc4de36d69b34db311924ff4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fd614df1-42e5-49b4-a62b-d7d6b84b66a0/retrieve","id":"-1102501073"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2e3fed6d-6354-4be7-8828-233adb9e4278","content":"In line with the monitoring and evaluation of the impacts of the East Africa Dairy Development Project (EADD) on farm level production in different seasons, a series of farm level surveys were carried out in selected sites of each project country. The first round of the survey in Uganda was conducted in July 2011. The results showed that costs of dairy production at that time were higher among the medium-scale farmers and also in the extensive production hubs (Table 1 and Table 2). Mortality of animals was a main contributor to the high cost of production. Other important cost components in various hubs included milk to calves and hired labour (EADD 2011). The second round of the monitoring of costs of milk production was conducted in the month of September 2012 in the same sites as the first round. The monitoring aimed to:1. Assess the costs of production and profitability of the dairy enterprise in 2012 2. Identify interventions that the EADD should target in order to enhance profitability of dairy farming in the project countries 1 Revenues used in calculation do not include cattle sales 2 Revenues used in calculation include sale of milk and cattleThe six project sites selected during the first round of the survey were used. Farming practiced in three of the sites was mainly intensive, while that in the other three sites was mainly extensive. Most of the farmers sampled in the first round of the survey were interviewed in the second round.In the few cases where farmers who participated in the first round were not available, replacement farmers within the vicinity and under similar farming conditions were requested to provide information for the survey. Small-scale farmers comprised those owning less than three cows in the intensive production systems and those owning less than 15 cows in the extensive production systems. Medium-scale farmers comprised those owning more than four cows in the intensive system and more than fifteen cows in the extensive system 3 . A total of sixty farmers were interviewed; twenty-seven from mainly intensive systems and thirty-three from mainly extensive systems (Table 3). An estimate of total milk production 3 months preceding the survey was obtained based on farmer recall using a carefully designed set of questions that captured milk production immediately after calving, and the milk production on the day prior to the interview. These were collected for every lactating cow at the time of the survey to estimate milk yield using the area under the lactation curve. Details of this calculation are provided in Annex 1.Two different scenarios were considered in calculating revenues, one which included revenue from the sale of the animal, and one in which this was not a factor. These are presented in Table 4. In the scenario that included cattle sales, an attempt was made to provide some insight into the effects of animal prices on profitability. It should be noted that cattle sales are infrequent, hence the scenario with sale of animals occurs less frequently. Milk given to calves and labourers was included as both an expense and revenue since it is a product of the farm. Milk sales were valued using prices from the corresponding marketing channels in a project site. The price reported for the hub was obtained as the mean price from the various market outlets in every hub. Milk consumed at home and milk given to labourers and to calves was valued at the same price as that of the nearest hub. Information on non-market benefits such as draught power, manure used in the farm and benefits derived from cattle as a form of savings and insurance were not collated in the survey, hence were not included in computation of revenue.Costs included in the analyses for the two different scenarios are presented in Table 4. To determine costs resulting from mortality within herds, the farmers were requested to provide information on the number of animals within different age classes that had died on their farms over the last six months. The proportionate mortality within the different animal categories is presented in table 5. The highest mortality within the period studied was among bulls (16.4%). Mortality of both male and female calves was also high (>10%). The cost of mortality was calculated using the mortality rate and the market price for each animal type within the different sites. Information on these prices was provided within the questionnaire. The total cost of mortality within a site was then calculated as the sum of the mortality costs over all animal types within the site. The cost of mortality per litre of milk produced was obtained by dividing the total cost of mortality by the total milk production over the last three months.Fixed costs included depreciation of machines, equipment, buildings, other cattle enterprise structures and their maintenance. Variable costs comprised of hired labour, feeds, animal health inputs, breeding costs, extension and milk transport. Cattle purchases were not included in computing expenses. Details of calculations are provided in Annex 2.Profits for the two scenarios presented in Table 4 were calculated as the difference between the revenues and the costs using partial budget analysis. Profitability was compared between hubs, farmers' scale of operation and production systems. Comparison of mean revenues, costs and profits was done between production systems and scales of operations using t-tests and anova to determine whether the means were significantly different. Descriptive statistics were used to show distribution of revenues, costs and profits across hubs. Under the first Scenario, farmers in half of the hubs (Buikwe, Ggulama and Kiboga) made profit per litre of milk produced (Table 6). The greatest contributor to the lower returns from the dairies was the high rate of mortality reported by the farmers in all the hubs. This was different from the first round of the survey as at that time the farmers were not requested to quantify the mortality. The highest costs resulting from mortality were incurred by farmers in Bbale (Ush 2570, Table 6).In this round of the study, farmers in Kiboga received the highest revenue and overall profit from their dairy enterprise. As in the first round of the survey, farmers using the more intensive system of production received higher average prices for every litre of milk (milk revenue, Table 6), while farmers in the extensive system received higher average revenues from cattle sales. The sale of manure was only noted in Bukwe and Bubusi hubs (Table 6). It was evident that farmers generate considerable revenue from sales of cattle. In all the hubs, profits were much lower when revenue calculated did not include that from sale of animals (Table 7). Farmers rearing animals under both intensive and extensive production systems incurred losses when revenue was considered as that from milk sales without taking into account animal sales. It was only in Ggulama hub that farmers made profits from revenue generated only through sale of milk. This result indicates the importance of cattle sales to profitability of dairy enterprises in Uganda. The proportional contribution of revenue from the sale of cattle to the dairy enterprise relative to that from milk sales is presented in Figure 1. Farmers in extensive production systems made relatively more income from cattle sales than from sales of milk, while farmers in more intensive production systems made relatively more revenue from the sale of milk than from the sale of animals. Revenues Differences in revenue due to scale of farming operation are presented in Table 8. Small scale farmers made more revenue from milk than the medium scale farmers (Milk sales, p<.01). Though the farmers also generated some revenue from the sale of manure, this was relatively low and not significantly different between small and medium scale farmers (Table 8). Although revenues from sales of cattle between the two systems were different, not all farmers in the two systems sold animals. Farmers practicing medium scale production however obtained higher revenues from sales of animals than small scale farmers.The medium-scale farmers incurred higher total costs per litre of milk produced than the small-scale farmers (Table 8). This was mainly due to significantly higher costs of milk spoilage, and higher Extensive System mortality costs within these systems (p<0.01). Small scale farmers on the other hand incurred higher cost from milk given to calves (P<0.05).In this round of the survey, under both Small scale and medium scale operations, the farmers made losses when profit was calculated using revenues from milk sales only (Table 8). The loss was higher for medium scale farmers. However, when profits were calculated using combined revenue from milk and cattle sales, small scale farmers generated some profit, however medium scale farmers still made an overall loss in their dairy enterprise (Table 8). Farmers from the extensive production system generated significantly higher total revenues when both milk and cattle sales were considered (p<0.05, Table 9). Within these systems, the farmers also generated higher revenues from cattle sales than farmers operating intensive production (p<0.01).In contrast, farmers from the intensive systems generated higher revenue from milk sales (p<0.01, Table 9), demonstrating the important role played by milk sales among the intensive system farmers and that of cattle sales among the extensive system farmers in enhancing profitability of the dairy enterprise.Farmers from the extensive production system incurred higher total cost per litre than those from the intensive system (p<0.05, Table 9). A main contributor to the costs in these systems was a high cost of mortality (p<0.01) and milk spoilage (p<0.01). In contrast, farmers from the intensive production system incurred higher costs from milk given to labourers (p<0.1) and to calves (p<0.01, Table 9).Farmers from both intensive and extensive production systems made losses when considering revenues from milk sales only (p<0.01, Table 9). This was a result of the high costs of mortality reported in both systems. When revenue was considered from both milk and cattle sales, farmers operating more intensive production made a profit, while those operating extensive production made losses. The loss made was however significantly lower than that made when only revenue from milk was considered Table9. The proportional contribution of various components to the costs of dairy production within the different hubs where farmers practiced intensive production are presented in Figure 2. Within these hubs, mortalities, purchased feeds, hired Labour, animal health and calf milk were the major drivers of cost. Within these systems, the EADD project team needs to focus its efforts towards reducing these cost components when devising interventions to reduce cost of producing milk. Interventions that EADD is undertaking to improve feeding practices should be scaled out. Improved animal health practices also need to be emphasized to reduce expenses related to mortalities. Interventions to improve calf management also need to be scaled out to other project areas so as to reduce the cost that farmers are incurring on calf feeding.The proportional contribution of various factors to the costs of dairy production within the different hubs where farmers practiced more extensive production are presented in Figure 3. In these systems, high mortality rates are a major contributor to costs in all the hubs. Additionally, Hired labour, animal health and milk spoilage also reduced farmers' profits.Interventions to reduce mortality costs should be employed in all hubs. Better milk handling practices should also be emphasized in Kiboga and Kinyogoga to reduce losses from milk spoilage.The study showed that the cost of milk production was higher among the medium-scale farmers and also in the extensive production hubs similar to the findings from the first round of the survey. A major contributor to the costs of production was a high animal mortality rate. The project needs to fast-track efforts geared towards management of animals at different stages of growth, and improvement of animal health in order to reduce cattle mortalities. Both access to animal health services and capacity development of producers in areas of management and health are critical.Strategies that EADD is implementing to improve feeding practices and avail feeds during dry seasons by utilizing the wet season surplus should be promoted in all hubs to assist farmers cut down on cost of feed and reduce fluctuations in feed availability on the farms. Likewise, interventions geared towards improvement of calf management and feeding need to be scaled out so as to reduce the cost that farmers are incurring on calf milk especially in intensive production system where demand for milk is high and farmers could be tempted to underfeed the calves. In select hubs, milk handling needs to be improved in order to reduce its spoilage. Cattle sales played a major role in enhancing revenue especially among the medium-scale farmers and for those practicing more extensive production. Conversely, revenue generated from milk sales was higher among small-scale farmers and those practicing the intensive production. Information on the actual productivity per individual animal within all the systems would assist in determining where the greatest interventions are required in both intensive and more extensive systems in order to improve profitability of dairy production and improve household incomes in the targeted populations.The difference in results on costs of production from the second round of the survey relative to the first demonstrate annual variations in revenues and costs of raising dairy animals within the different areas of the country. A regression was done for milk production levels the day preceding the survey and at calving against time, for the different breeds. Lactating cows were grouped into two categories per breed; Those whose current lactation length is greater or equal to three months  Those whose current lactation length is less than three months The area under the lactation curve was calculated for these categories to get three months milk yield estimates. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2544607428.json b/main/part_2/2544607428.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a10ba3e10fb6edbe5243c133e2c2ac1410ad129 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2544607428.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"fdd9e7ce1d232f43e0650642ef174445","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5299bc61-bd58-462a-8a5c-c76be3f9066a/retrieve","id":"-835739009"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"233265ea-b7df-4059-8571-bca17c280457","content":"An important debate is currently under way among researchers and policy makers about the relative merits of using organic versus inorganic fertilisers to improve soil fertility in semiarid areas of subSaharan Africa. Environmentalists argue that use of inorganic fertiliser contributes to natural resource degradation and recommend use of organic fertilisers as a means of promoting sustainable agriculture. Opponents of this view maintain that a more rapid introduction of inorganic fertilisers is required in subSaharan Africa where current levels of use are extremely low, even when compared with other developing countries.This debate has important implications for agricultural intensification and sustainable development in the Sudanian and SaheloSudanian agroecological zones of semiarid West Africa. This paper assesses the profitability of using inorganic fertiliser and constraints posed on its use in the semiarid farming systems of West Africa. It argues that under current conditions in these regions, organic and inorganic fertilisers are complements and not substitutes. The critical requirement for improving food production in these regions is to increase the use of inorganic fertiliser. Government policies need to support fertiliser importation and diffusion with conducive policies.Introduction of improved varieties alone does not constitute a sustainable strategy and rather results in the mining of soil nutrients. Furthermore, the fact that both soil fertility and water are limiting agronomic constraints also acts as an obstacle to adequate provision of water when fertiliser is also not applied. Another dimension of the problem relates to the food security risk that inorganic fertiliser purchases pose for vulnerable farm households faced with frequent rain and crop failure.Notwithstanding the above, under existing farming conditions in the Sudanian and SaheloSudanian zones of semiarid West Africa, imported inorganic fertilisers are the only technically efficient and economically profitable way to overcome prevailing soilfertility constraints. Until wider experimentation makes them more successful, alternative soil fertility measures, such as organic fertilisers and natural rock phosphate, should be seen as complements to not substitutes for imported inorganic fertilisers.Field data from a Sudanian site in the Central Plateau of Burkina Faso and a SaheloSudanian site in the Niamey region of Niger serve to evaluate the profitability and potential diffusion of fertiliser technologies in representative sites of semiarid West Africa.The site in Burkina Faso is a small farm area where pearl millet and sorghum are principally cultivated. Crop allocation is adjusted to topographical differences in soil fertility and waterretention capacity, with crops tolerant of low soil fertility and drought stress being planted on the sandier, less fertile soils higher in the toposequence. Cereal yields are low because of low fertiliser usage. Population pressure has broken down the traditional bush fallow rotation system in much of the Central Plateau.The site in Niger is characteristic of a densely populated landshortage system, with low, variable rainfall, but good market access. Rainfed agriculture with millet/cowpea intercropping predominates in the area though there is some limited irrigation. With the current lowcashinput rainfed practices, wind erosion and increasing population density, rainfedland quality has been declining and more marginal land has been brought into cultivation. Intensification of irrigated activities has taken place, but not of rainfed activities. Population pressure and increasing profitability of agriculture are pushing for a shift from extensive to intensive production practices.Wholefarm model results for the two study sites demonstrate that differences in rainfall and soil characteristics in the Sudanian and SaheloSudanian agroclimatic zones require specific technology strategies to overcome the water availability constraint.In the higherrainfall Sudanian zone with its heavier soils, the new technologies are tied ridges (water retention device reducing runoff) and fertiliser use. Fertiliser can be used on sorghum land, but increases in income are not as great as those for tied ridges alone. However, the adoption of tied ridges in the absence of inorganic fertiliser is not a sustainable solution because increasing water use by plants will cause soil nutrients to be mined. It follows that inorganic fertiliser needs to be combined with the water retention device. In addition, policies are required that moderate cereal price collapses in goodrainfall years so as to maintain the profitability of inorganic fertiliser and encourage its use.In the SaheloSudanian zone, improved shortcycle cultivars can be adopted profitably, or in combination with phosphorus (P) fertiliser. However, in combination with both nitrogen (N) and P fertiliser adoption of shortercycle varieties does not result in increased incomes. Shortcycle early cultivars provide some drought escape and lower production risk, especially in low rainfall years. Without a means of maintaining soil fertility, however, the use of improved cultivars will lead to further mining of soil nutrients. A stepwise approach of P fertiliser adoption with improved shortcycle varieties, is therefore proposed as a first step. Later, both N and P can also be adopted once improved longercycle varieties are developed by breeders [this breeding strategy has now been adopted by INRAN (the National Agricultural Research Institute of Niger) and the International Crops Research Institute for the SemiArid Tropics (ICRISAT). This approach will contribute to relieving water and soil fertility constraints, while at the same time generating higher incomes and profits.The model results presented support the importance of the rapid introduction of inorganic fertiliser in semiarid West Africa. This could be strengthened by the improvement in the macroeconomic environment and liberalisation of domestic economic policies currently under way in the French currency countries. West African governments can facilitate this process by making the importation of inorganic fertilisers easier for the private sector and by enabling, rather than resisting, higher domestic cereal prices for farmers to profit from fertiliser use and intensify their production.For more information on this issue see: Shapiro B.I. and Sanders J.H. 1998. Fertilizer use in semiarid West Africa: Profitability and supporting policy. Agricultural Systems 56(4):467-482."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2547181910.json b/main/part_2/2547181910.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..30f033e55c68884a08c298f8f691135ecfba9e94 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2547181910.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b911893861cec7e62aee94eb6de261e3","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1a7acd9e-2f0e-40e7-9848-dba03623b93a/retrieve","id":"-149776544"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"189cd89c-02b9-496d-bd50-ec0629ca047f","content":"Overcoming challenges to digital agribusiness start-ups and promising ways to overcome them. Challenges covered include access to finance, knowing the customer base, sourcing data, access to technical, business and management skills and support, the policy environment, what farmers need, languages and formats, trust, and data ownership and privacy. The recent CTA workshop on 'catalysing actionable knowledge to enhance next-generation ACP agribusiness through digitalisation' identified five intersecting drivers that explain what farmer-oriented agribusinesses expect to achieve by investing in digitalisation: reduced risk, raised productivity, increased efficiency, improved decisions, and enhanced market access. Participants argued that digital interventions all serve one or more of these, depending on specific local needs and situations. A critical factor underpinning what works in all these areas is the economic sustainability of the business models used to deliver value and services. This brief by Wietske Kropff, Valarie Pilgrim and Paul Neate introduces a set of business-plan challenges faced by digital agribusiness start-ups in ACP countries Experience capitalisation series17 CTA Technical BriefOvercoming challenges to digital agribusiness start-ups Experience capitalisation series 2Digital agriculture -the use of data and information technologies to increase the efficiency and profitability of agriculture and related value chains to deliver more and better food -has transformed agriculture and food production in North America, Europe and Australasia. But we need to deliver its benefits to small-scale operations in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific (ACP) to help these regions deal with the challenges they are facing.Agriculture globally is facing enormous challenges. Key among these is the prospect of feeding nearly 10 billion people by 2050 in the face of climate change and increasing shortages of land, water and other inputs. To do this, agriculture needs a major shot in the arm -and digital agriculture offers the possibility of providing this.But digital agribusiness is an emerging sector in the ACP, and those trying to introduce it face enormous challenges to deliver impacts at scale while making a profit. This brief, based on findings from a recent workshop with ACP entrepreneurs and practitioners, outlines some of these challenges as a contribution to discussions about how to bring about the next agricultural revolution -the digital agricultural revolution.A big problem that all start-ups face is access to finance, and the digital agriculture sector is no different. Most digital agriculture startups in ACP countries depend on financing from the development sector to get started. This has its challenges. This finance is by its nature very short term and usually targeted to support during only a pilot phase -not to the longer-term commercial growth of the business. It is also largely directed towards developmental rather than commercial objectives. This creates something of a conundrum. The clients who are most likely to be able to pay for services and inputs are larger farmers and traders, who see this as an investment rather than as a cost. But developmentoriented donors are looking for interventions that will raise small-scale farmers and businesses out of poverty -and these are clients who are likely to be highly risk-averse and unwilling to pay for inputs and services that are less than a 'sure thing.' Maybe one way to address this is for projects to pursue multiple revenue streams. For example, one digital agriculture project in West Africa is generating only 20% of its revenue from small-scale farmers -its target audience. The other 80% comes from selling the data it is gathering about the farming sector to financial institutions and other businesses that want to target the agricultural sector.Getting financing to scale up operations is also a major challenge, especially for businesses operating in emerging sectors such as digital agriculture. Banks and financial institutions have little knowledge or experience in these new areas and see them as highly risky. Businesses in their early years will struggle to demonstrate the kind of longterm financial history that many investors are looking for.There are also some not-so-typical costs associated with starting and scaling up a digital agriculture enterprise. Such businesses have to invest in collecting and analysing data on the performance and impacts of the technology that they are employing and in using the results to refine their business proposal and to provide investors with evidence of the development impact and financial viability of the business. These objectives often conflict and the picture is complicated by the fact that many digital agriculture businesses have found that they have to be opportunistic and pursue multiple revenue streams in their early years in order to cover their costs -small-scale farmers and businesses are not willing or able to pay much for services, especially when their benefits are unproven. This 'blurs' their core business model, which can put off investors -but so does lack of income. More needs to be done by organisations like CTA, the CGIAR and the Global Donor Platform for Rural Development to make development donors and other investors aware of the realities of pushing the frontiers of digital agriculture and to encourage them to be more flexible in assessing the investment potential of such projects.The issue of financing also links in with possibly the single most important aspect of developing a new product or serviceknowing you customer. This is one of the major data gaps that digital agriculture start-ups face -lack of reliable background data on potential clients, their needs and their circumstances (especially their financial circumstances and ability and willingness to pay for services). Without these data, it is difficult to formulate a good business model that has a realistic chance of becoming a sustainable business. And yet gathering such Experience capitalisation series 3 Overcoming challenges to digital agribusiness start-upsdata is an area that donors are reluctant to fund because the return on investment is not immediately obvious.There are numerous examples where farmer profiling and the like is paying dividends, including the likes of NUCAFE and Igara Tea in Uganda. Not only have these brought benefits to the client group through delivery of tailored products and services, they are also piquing the interest of the agribusiness sector and financial institutions, who also need to know more about these potential clients to improve their own business intelligence. Some enterprises have already found that these data can become the basis for alternative revenue streams that can cross-subsidise the delivery of their core product to farmers.On the topic of data, digital agriculture start-ups often face challenges in accessing the data they need to deliver their services. Some key data are lacking, such as the detailed soil and vegetation maps commonly available across Europe and North America. Even weather data may be restricted and closely regulated -in some countries, for example, the government meteorological agency has monopolistic control over access to and dissemination of weather data. Digital agriculture initiatives have to invest heavily in generating their own data or buying it from commercial sources and finding ways to work around existing constraints, adding to their costs and challenges.As with any 'bleeding edge' initiatives anywhere in the world, digital agriculture entrepreneurs in the ACP are unlikely to find people with all the skills that they need. For example, several start-ups that are using drones in Africa found that they could not find trained -or even amateur -drone pilots. The only way forward was for them to identify the types of skills and experience that make someone a good prospect as a drone pilot and then to develop their own training programme. This is an additional expense that start-ups have to plan for (and that they themselves do not necessarily have the skills to implement).Running a business is tricky for anyone, and even more so for those just starting out.All businesses need marketing and other business management expertise and business support services, but these are not always easy to come by. Start-ups also benefit from mentoring and coaching, but again this support is rarely available in ACP countries.A strong entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystem, including incubators, accelerators, corporate venture capital, angel investors and the like significantly increases the probability of new businesses succeeding. Establishing such an ecosystem is going to require an integrated approach involving the public and private sector to put all these pieces in place.While there has recently been growing interest in supporting entrepreneurial development, both among governments and among donors, many budding entrepreneurs find that finding staff with even basic literacy and numeracy skills is a challenge and this can constrain the development of their business. This highlights the ongoing need for public-sector investment in education at all levels. There is also a strong potential role here for incubators, accelerators, mentoring schemes and other initiatives to support business skills development at local levels.This is the elephant in the room. You have an idea for a great product that will change people's lives; you have clients that want it, and a business plan that shows how you will make a go of it. But what about the policy environment? This is a real issue for emerging technologies like those used in digital agriculture -many are so new that the policy environment has not caught up with them. For example, few ACP countries have policies and legislation in place that govern the use of drones in the agricultural sector. And changes can come in at any time, changing the basis on which businesses operate. In some cases these can be positive. For example, Uganda introduced new regulations on savings and credit cooperatives that imposed strict financial reporting requirements. This provided a boost for Ensibuuko, which provides a financial management and reporting package for such operations, as it created a demandfor this type of product. It also raised the profile of the sector in the eyes of investors. However, changes can also be negative, such as if a new tax is introduced on, for example, mobile money transactions.Businesses operating in the digital agriculture space have to be flexible and ready to deal with this rapidly changing environment. Some have taken a proactive approach, engaging with government officials and others who will influence these developments, keeping them up to date with developments in the sector and feeding them a constant stream of positive messages about the benefits of these technologies. This can have positive results, but is a considerable overhead and risk to the emerging business.Henry Ford famously said, \"If I had asked [my customers] what they had wanted, they would have said a faster horse.\" Farmers and others engaged in the agricultural value chains may not be aware of the potential of some of the technologies behind the current digital agriculture revolution, so there may be a case for such Fordian bluesky thinking in this sector. But this comes with its own challenges: Will your potential customers recognise the 'problem' that you are addressing? Will they be willing or able to pay for your solution? Do they have and know how to use the technology on which your solution is based (smart phone or feature phone, tablet, computer)?This depends on a number on other factors, including coverage of telecommunications infrastructure (which commonly declines rapidly the further one gets from major centres of habitation) and literacy generally and digital literacy in particular. One successful digital agriculture start-up stated that 80% of their marketing effort is expended on educating their audience about fundamentals, such as how to use a mobile phone to send and receive texts, and only 20% on their product per se. This will have to be borne in mind when planning marketing efforts.Language is also a major consideration. What language should your system work in? Should it be text-based, or does your target clientele want any messages in spoken or graphical form?This is a key question in planning your 'marketing' strategy. Do they trust government extension agents, or local traders, or do they look to innovative farmers in their community, for example? Are there existing farmers' organisations or trade bodies that would be a conduit to reaching a large number of possible target clients with your marketing efforts?Trust is also a very big issue when dealing with client data, such as in farmer profiling. This is a new area to many people, who will be unfamiliar with the risks and issues relating to giving people access to information about themselves and their operations. Clients will want to know how their data will be used, and who will have access to them. Digital agriculture businesses will need to be open and above board about these and spend time gaining the trust of their clients. Few ACP countries have legislation in place yet concerning data privacy, and digital agriculture businesseswill be at the forefront of dealing with this emergent issue.So you have your product and you have your target clientele. The next challenge is to build your customer base, and to persuade them to pay for your services. This is where many start-ups founder. With so many donors supporting so many initiatives in the digital agriculture space, farmers and others along the value chain are being inundated with offers for exciting new services, many of which will be free of charge. Many, if not all, are initially unproven and require a leap of faith from the client. Donors and entrepreneurs need to be mindful of the conditions that signal that the enterprise is on a path to sustainability (strategic linkages, access to competitively priced inputs, size of client base, revenue, policy environment) and design projects that include activities that are directly aimed at helping the digital agriculture start-up to achieve these conditions. Some start-ups have used the pilot phase of their operation to offer their services free of charge to their target audience, and then phased in charges once the users have seen the benefits for themselves. The start-up will have to make this clear to its clients from the beginning and provide a clear indication of the likely scale of the fees if it is not to lose the trust of its clientele when it tries to introduce fees.As noted elsewhere, other operations have pursued multiple revenue streams, such as charging low fees to their target audience and supplementing this income by selling their market intelligence to other businesses who might want to target the same audience, e.g. banks, input suppliers and the like. This has parallels in the e-commerce world but must be handled carefully to ensure that the operation does not fall foul of data privacy legislation or lose the trust of its clientele.Other projects have delivered their services through farmers' organisations or cooperatives, with the fee for the services being bundled up with membership fees. This has some promise as an approach, as the services -once shown to provide real benefits -add value to the membership of the organisation providing them, and the data generated through profiling of its members becomes a strong bargaining chip for negotiating with buyers and sellers of other goods and services.Whatever the approach adopted, success will not come overnight. As the head on one successful digital agriculture start-up said, \"The journey is long and painful. If you don't have patience and resilience, you will not succeed.\"The world needs digital agriculture to take off if we are to meet the challenges of feeding a growing population without destroying the environment or the world in which we live.Governments, educational institutions, research and development agencies, donors, investors and others each have vital roles to play in creating a business environment in which digital agriculture entrepreneurs can thrive.The challenge now is to transform the many challenges into opportunities, and the opportunities into a reality for digital entrepreneurs, small-scale farmers, traders and others in the developing world.CTA Technical Briefs document experience and learning in topical issues of interest to the ACP agricultural development community. They are intended as a practical guide for people involved in an issue professionally or for people with a strong interest in the topic.Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation P.O. Box 380 -6700 AJ Wageningen -The Netherlands Tel: +31 (0) 317 467 100 | E-mail: cta@cta.int | www.cta.int"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2551732921.json b/main/part_2/2551732921.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..74ce91dd0e8450ab5d0aae03f4fb8a313e50e368 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2551732921.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"7d7333df-af70-404f-91e3-e2fa8c5cdeea","content":"\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2560082385.json b/main/part_2/2560082385.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a93cbb1618be0e89b5c60d97c28a824257794ed --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2560082385.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ea61aabbe05f5da114759d01d9148e61","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/da012526-6131-4e1d-bb1a-b2b48b5196bf/retrieve","id":"1317987446"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1bfb5e7f-293f-48cb-8a04-8cb4a3159925","content":"Click here for DOI Hello! Welcome to Issue #17 of Climate Insights, the Climate Impact Platform's fortnightly roundup of the latest publications on climate change impacts and adaptation, mitigation measures, and the physical science from the literature. We're tracking trending topics in the climate space and linking them to our work for a food secure future with a brief comment on the implications of this new research on our own portfolio of climate research for development.Here's your roundup from the last week:How do household crop and livestock production adapt to extreme climatic events? -Insights from a typical agro-pastoral ecotone on the Qinghai Tibet Plateau Zhang, Hailin, et al. (2024), How do household crop and livestock production adapt to extreme climatic events? -Insights from a typical agro-pastoral ecotone on the Qinghai Tibet Plateau, Environmental Science & Policy.The increased threat of more frequent extreme climatic events (ECEs) poses significant challenges to household crops and livestock production, exacerbated by their weak adaptability. To explore ways to improve households' adaptation awareness and behaviors, a typical agro-pastoral ecotone on the northeastern Qinghai Tibet Plateau (QTP), Gonghe Sandy Land (GSL), was selected as the study area. This study analyses the impact of ECEs, and the adaptation measures taken by households, and innovatively includes the perception of government services from households in the factor system to identify the key driving mechanism of coping strategies. The results revealed that (1) 74.07 % of households experienced an extreme drought, and livestock production was 29.63 % more affected than crop production was; (2) households adopted different adaptation strategies with weather forecasts being the prevailing measure among households for crop (25.93 %) and livestock (42.33 %) production adaptation; and (3) different strategies are key to improving adaptive capacity. The study ound that production experience sharing, demographic and economic coordination, and early warning system and support by the government can increase farmers' awareness of adaptation strategies. While enhancing cognitive levels regarding measures, optimizing a household's health, rationally allocating assets, and increasing timely and stable government services can improve adaptive behaviors.Alliance Bioversity and CIAT developed a Targeting Tool that facilitates the combination of different climate risk indicators, including bioclimatic variables, risk of droughts, floods, heat stress, flooding and waterlogging, into risk hotspot maps. Through the characterisation function of the tool, users can estimate the extent to which people, animals, and crops are exposed to climate risks and identify priority areas for adaptation action.Navigating seasonality in cotton-based farming systems in southern Mali Dissa, Arouna, et al. (2024), Navigating seasonality in cotton-based farming systems in southern Mali, Climate Risk Management.Smallholder farmers' livelihoods follow predictable and cyclical patterns related to annual cycles of weather, crop and animal production and market fluctuations. Understanding seasonality forms an essential part of unravelling farming systems behaviour and performance, especially in contexts with strong seasonality, such as southern Mali. This study aimed to understand farmers' management decisions to cope with weather variability and related consequences. The study used a case study approach to analyse temporal interactions between farming system components using data collected over three consecutive years (2017)(2018)(2019).Farmers undertook diverse production activities, which helped to mitigate negative consequences of crop failure. While providing opportunities for increased adaptive capacity, this diversity also creates interdependencies among farming system components, leading to reinforced positive outcomes in good years and negative outcomes in bad years. The findings suggest that a better understanding of farm management decisions and the influence of seasonality is key to support farm productivity and to expand the adaptive capacity of smallholders. The findings suggest that policies aiming to support farm productivity should pay attention to the specific impediments faced by farms with different resource endowments to adapt to changes. Especially, access to credit helps poorer farmers not only to navigate the seasonal food and cash constraints but also to escape poverty traps.The production and trade of agricultural commodities like cotton is a major driver of the loss of tropical biodiversity. In this paper, CGIAR scientists at CIMMYT explored the linkages between the profitability of cotton and land-use changes in Zimbabwe.Fisheries track the future redistribution of marine species Cruz, Leonardo, et al. (2024), Fisheries track the future redistribution of marine species, Nature Climate Change.The redistribution of fish stocks induced by climate change is expected to have global implications for fisheries, particularly the poleward shifts of species. However, the responses of different fishing gears and fleet of countries and their potential attempts to spatially redistribute catches remain unknown. Here, by developing environmental niche models for industrial fisheries of 82 countries and 13 fishing gears, the authors demonstrate that without management, global fleets are expected to shift poleward by the end of the century. This is driven by polar fishing gears moving to higher Arctic areas and tropical fishing gears expanding both within the tropics and poleward. Most nations, particularly tropical ones, may struggle to track these shifts, as they largely rely on coastal and nearshore fishing gears, such as trawlers. The findings highlight the need to consider future shifts of fisheries in their management, to ensure the long-term sustainability and accessibility of fish stocks.CGIAR strives to engage the \"tropical majority' , recognizing that challenges to its sustainability are predominantly faced in LMICs in the tropics. This paper co-authored by CGIAR scientists at WorldFish outlines four key actions to achieve equitable and effective ocean conservation and aquatic food system sustainability. The authors provide a more comprehensive understanding of the environmental and social constraints on CDR, ensuring that climate mitigation efforts do not compromise biodiversity, ecosystem services, or human well-being.The CGIAR Climate Impact Platform held a webinar on adaptation and carbon dioxide removal in a warming world. The discussion included the need for expanding land-based carbon dioxide removal. Carbon sequestration on agricultural land, albeit long-time neglected, offers substantial mitigation potential. Here the authors project, using an economic land-use model, that these options offer cumulative mitigation potentials comparable to afforestation by 2050 at 160 USD2022 tCO2 equivalent (tCO2e−1), with most of it located in the Global South. Carbon sequestration on agricultural land could provide producers around the world with additional revenues of up to 375 billion USD2022 at 160 USD2022 tCO2e−1 and allow achievement of net-zero emissions in the agriculture, forestry and other landuse sectors by 2050 already at economic costs of around 80-120 USD2022 tCO2e−1. This would, in turn, decrease economy-wide mitigation costs and increase gross domestic product (+0.6%) by the mid-century in 1.5 °C no-overshoot climate stabilization scenarios compared with mitigation scenarios that do not consider these options. Unlocking these potentials requires the deployment of highly efficient institutions and monitoring systems over the next 5 years across the whole world, including sub-Saharan Africa, where the largest mitigation potential exists.The CGIAR Initiative on Low-Emissions Food Systems (Mitigate+) aims to offer a comprehensive and evidence-based view of national land use, agricultural production, diet, and food system emissions in various countries, including Kenya,and explore possible pathways that reduce emissions while enhancing food security, nutrition, livelihoods and preserving the environment in these countries.Okoli, Adaugo, et al. ( 2024), Monitoring soil carbon in smallholder carbon projects: insights from Kenya, Climate Change.Voluntary carbon market schemes facilitate funding for projects promoting sustainable land management practices to sequester carbon in natural sinks such as biomass and soil, while also supporting agricultural production. The effectiveness of VCM schemes relies on accurate measurement mechanisms that can directly attribute carbon accumulation to project activities. This study evaluates nine different approaches for SOC accounting in smallholder agricultural projects. The approaches involve the use of proximal and remote sensing, along with process models. The evaluation centres on stakeholder requirements for the Measurement, Reporting, and Verification system, using the criteria of accuracy, level of standardisation, costs, adoptability, and the advancement of community benefits. By analysing these criteria, the authors highlight opportunities and challenges associated with each approach, presenting suggestions to enhance their applicability for smallholder SOC accounting. The contextual foundation of the research is a case study on the Western Kenya Soil Carbon Project.In this paper, CGIAR scientists at Alliance Bioversity and CIAT the added value of soil organic carbon quality measurements alongside total organic carbon content. above ambient significantly reduced the S, K, and Fe levels and altered the multi-element ratio, with different elements behaving differently. This shift in pollen multi-element composition may have subsequent cascading effects on higher trophic levels. To assess the impact on bees, the authors calculated the stoichiometric mismatch (a measure of the discrepancy between consumer needs and food quality) for two bee species, Osmia bicornis (red mason bee) and Apis mellifera (honey bee), that consume oak pollen in nature. They observed stoichiometric mismatches for P and S, in pollen under eCO2, which could negatively affect bees. They highlight the need for a comprehensive understanding of the changes in pollen multielement stoichiometry under eCO2, which leads to nutrient limitations under climate change with consequences for bees.In this U.S. News & World Report featured study, IFPRI, Harvard University, and other institutions analyse the consequences of bee pollination loss on human health.Ren, Shaoting, et al. ( 2024), Observed and projected declines in glacier albedo across the Third Pole in the 21st century, One Earth.Glaciers are crucial water resources in the Third Pole (the Tibetan Plateau and its surroundings) and are shrinking in response to climate change. Glacier albedo is an expression of glacier interactions with climate and dust/black carbon, and albedo reduction enhances glacier mass loss, but its changes and potential drivers remain poorly quantified. The authors everage satellite observations to explore the variability of glacier albedo and understand its sensitivity to potential drivers and its future evolution. The authors find that glacier albedo has declined during 2001-2020, but high interannual variability is also an important signal. These variations are ighly sensitive to air temperature and snow conditions and to nearby dust/black carbon emission sources. Future changes to these drivers will lead to further decreases of 2.9%-12.5% in glacier albedo by 2100 under different warming scenarios. These findings highlight the importance of albedo in glacier future evolution and the urgency of action to mitigate climate warming.At an event co-hosted by IWMI and USAID, experts warn that rapid melting of glaciers in Pakistan's north could turn the Indus River seasonal, endangering 240 million lives.Amin, Md. Mushaddiqul Islam, et al. (2024), Assessing effects of agriculture and industry on CO2emissions in Bangladesh, PLOS Climate.This study investigates the impact of Bangladesh's industrialization, agriculture, and imports on CO2emissions, exploring both linear and asymmetric relationships to inform sustainable development strategies. Advanced modeling techniques, namely autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) and nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) models are used to evaluate the impact of Bangladesh's agricultural and industrial sectors on CO2 emissions. Long and short-run coefficients are assessed using linear and asymmetry ARDL models, revealing that industrialization contributes to increased carbon emissions in Bangladesh. While the ARDL model reports that the effect of agriculturalization on CO2 emissions is insignificant in the long-run, the asymmetry ARDL model suggests a rapid reduction in carbon emissions due to agriculturalization, observed both in the long and short-run. Additionally, imports have considerable impact on carbon emissions. Diagnostic tests have confirmed the adequacy of the model, while stability tests have validated the estimated parameters' stability. Finally, the direction of association between variables is determined by applying linear and nonlinear Granger causality tests. This study underscores the importance of promoting sustainable industrial practices, enhancing agricultural efficiency, and regulating imports as pivotal strategies for mitigating CO2 emissions and achieving enduring environmental sustainability in Bangladesh.CGIAR's 2024 Breakthrough Agenda Report -Agriculture focuses on opportunities to scale up clean technologies to reduce emissions from enteric methane and from the production and use of fertilizers -the two subsectors with the highest emissions in the agrifood sector.Taillardat, Pierre, et al. ( 2024), Carbon dynamics and inconstant porewater input in a mangrove tidal creek over contrasting seasons and tidal amplitudes, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.Constraining the contribution of mangrove-derived carbon in tidal creeks is fundamental to understanding the fate of mangrove primary production and the role of mangroves as coastal carbon sinks. Porewater measurements and 24-h time series in a mangrove tidal creek were conducted during the dry and wet season, and over contrasting tidal ranges at the Can Gio Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Surface water carbon concentrations (dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2)) and their respective δ13C values were correlated with radon, suggesting that porewater input drives mangrove-derived carbon in the tidal creek. Based on three complementary mixing models, porewater input contributed to about 30% of the water volume and 46% to 100% of DOC and DIC pools in the tidal creek at low tide, with variabilities between seasons and tidal amplitudes. Tidal amplitude seemed to influence porewater input and its carbon loads, with a higher contribution during frequent and high tidal amplitudes (symmetric). However, the highest input occurred in a tidal cycle which was preceded by tidal cycle of low amplitude (asymmetric). The authors explain this ambiguity by the influence of both, rapid water turnover intensifying porewater exchange, and long water residence time enhancing carbon load in porewater.In addition to acting as carbon sinks, mangroves can also boost food security and nutrition Researchers from the Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF) along with partners are gathering evidence of just how much mangroves contribute to local diets and livelihoods.Li, Keke, et al. (2024), Human-altered soil loss dominates nearly half of water erosion in China but surges in agriculture-intensive areas, One Earth.Soil erosion is a major land degradation process, threatening global agricultural sustainability and carbon cycling. Although geomorphic evidence confirms that human activities have significantly accelerated soil erosion, to what extent humans have altered soil erosion and how to attribute it to different land use changes and economic activities remains uncertain at the national scale. Here, by developing an integrated modeling framework to assess human-altered soil erosion (HASE) by water and its drivers, the authorsestimate that nearly half of the total water erosion in China is dominated by HASE, rising to over 90% in agriculture-intensive areas. Household consumption emerges as a major hidden factor driving HASE.Conversely, human efforts, such as soil conservation practices like terraces, have effectively mitigated soil erosion. The findings provide a starting point to evaluate the magnitude of human intervention in soil erosion at the regional or global scale, highlighting the importance of controlling accelerated soil erosion from a coupled social-ecological perspective.This Alliance Bioversity and CIAT authored paper found that the high erosion potential of the soils can be attributed more to high rain erosivity than soil erodibility.Understanding the impact of elevated CO2 and O3 on growth and yield in Indian wheat cultivars: Implications for food security in a changing climate Mishra, Ashish Kumar, et al. (2024), Understanding the impact of elevated CO2 and O3 on growth and yield in Indian wheat cultivars: Implications for food security in a changing climate, Environmental Pollution. The criteria for recommending cultivars for agricultural practices should not be based only on their sensitivity/tolerance to O3. Still, they should also consider the effect of CO2 fertilization in the growing area. This experiment offers hope to sustain global food security, as the O3-sensitive wheat cultivar also showed promising results at elevated CO2. In essence, this research could pave the way for more resilient agricultural systems in the era of changing climate under elevated O3 and CO2 conditions.CIMMYT is revolutionizing wheat breeding, using cutting-edge AI and genetic diversity to develop varieties that yield more and can withstand environmental stresses. Compiled and written by Laura Rabago, with contributions from Suzie Marshall and Aditi Mukherji. If you are publishing a climate-related paper and would like to be featured, please email Laura Rabago (l.rabago@cgiar.org).CGIAR is a global research partnership for a food-secure future. CGIAR science is dedicated to transforming food, land, and water systems in a climate crisis. Its research is carried out by 13 CGIAR Centers in close collaboration with hundreds of partners, including national and regional research institutes, civil society organizations, academia, development organizations and the private sector. www.cgiar.orgWe would like to thank all funders who support this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund: www.cgiar.org/funders.To learn more about this Initiative, please visit this webpage.To learn more about this and other Initiatives in the CGIAR Research Portfolio, please visit www.cgiar.org/cgiar-portfolio.© 2024 Climate Impact Area Platform. Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International Licence (CC by 4.0)."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2566556337.json b/main/part_2/2566556337.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0263250cc6798548d58cf2d23262c01569f6c32d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2566556337.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"b5fa6556-913f-4302-aba8-b1bffbfa67e6","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2570009375.json b/main/part_2/2570009375.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eedcc290100eae09c2b017bd330dac097fa1d401 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2570009375.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5bf5bb4d84dce9c628fe1bde71b3a5e5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5eaadf98-de53-43ee-8abe-6386e8b015af/content","id":"-1398495349"},"keywords":["Soft wheat","Wheats","Food production","Temperature resistance","Climatic factors","Precipitation","Climatic zones","Climatology","Ethiopia. AGRIS category codes: P40 Meteorology and Climatology","E14 Development Economics and Policies Dewey decimal classification: 633.1"],"sieverID":"f4dbd322-5f74-4a23-872b-2ac1bbd3b8a1","content":"CIMMYT® (www.cimmyt.org) is an internationally funded, nonprofit, scientific research and training organization. Headquartered in Mexico, CIMMYT works with agricultural research institutions worldwide to improve the productivity, profitability, and sustainability of maize and wheat systems for poor farmers in developing countries. It is one of 16 food and environmental organizations known as the Future Harvest Centers. Located around the world, the Future Harvest Centers conduct research in partnership with farmers, scientists, and policymakers to help alleviate poverty and increase food security while protecting natural resources. The centers are supported by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (www.cgiar.org), whose members include nearly 60 countries, private foundations, and regional and international organizations. Financial support for CIMMYT's research agenda also comes from many other sources, including foundations, development banks, and public and private agencies.Future Harvest® builds awareness and support for food and environmental research for a world with less poverty, a healthier human family, well-nourished children, and a better environment. It supports research, promotes partnerships, and sponsors projects that bring the results of research to rural communities, farmers, and families in Africa, Asia, and Latin America (www.futureharvest.org).12 Map 5. Areas of Ethiopia where precipitation is over 350 mm, the mean minimum temperature is between 6 O and 11 O C during the wettest quarter of the year, and the growing season is 9 months or less.The additional dark areas receive between 300 and 350 mm of precipitation during the wettest quarter of the year.12 Map 6. Areas of Ethiopia where precipitation is over 350 mm, the mean minimum temperature is between 6° and 11°C during the wettest quarter of the year, and the growing season is 9 months or less. The additional dark areas have mean minimum temperatures between 11º to 13°C during the wettest quarter of the year. Precipitation and temperature limits were tested further by comparing them to climatic conditions at 180 wheat germplasm collection sites in Ethiopia.Results suggested a similar lower limit for precipitation and minimum temperature range, but a higher upper limit for minimum temperature range, although many collections were made at lower sites (for example, along major roads and in markets) that are warmer than actual wheat growing areas.Examining the potential for wheat cropping in drier or warmer environments, it was found that allowing production in areas with as little as 300 mm of precipitation during the wettest quarter resulted in the addition of a small area, primarily in the southeast near the Sinana research station. In contrast, raising The primary data source for the climatic analyses were the climate surfaces for Africa developed by Corbett (1994) using thin plate smoothing splines (Hutchinson 1995). In this technique, monthly mean data for precipitation and temperature are The DEM had a 2.5 arc-minute grid size, which is roughly equivalent to a 5 km x 5 km grid size for regions near the equator. In addition to the basic climate variables, the set of surfaces includes data for potential evapotranspiration (PET) and ratios of precipitation to PET (P/PET). These variables are provided both on an annual basis and for various season models, including an optimal season defined as the five-month period with the highest value of P/PET and the wettest quarter defined as the three consecutive months with the greatest precipitation.Climate data for long-term monthly means at specific sites were obtained from the FAO climate database for Africa (FAO 1984). A list of the locations considered in the current study is given in Table 2; the locations are also shown in Map 1.Zones for climate and site similarity within Ethiopia were defined using the Ethiopia Country Almanac (ECA), a component of the Country Almanac Series of CD-ROM-based data sets and tools for manipulating spatial data (Corbett et al. 1999). August was allowed.In Ethiopia, wheat is grown primarily as a rainfed crop by smallholders in the highlands (Map 1). In most of the country, only a single wheat crop is grown during the second, longer rainy season (meher) which usually starts in June (Fig. 1). The short rains Bread wheat accounts for roughly 60% of total wheat production and nearly all cultivars are derived from modern, semi-dwarf wheats. Durum wheat accounts for most of the remaining 40%, although emmer wheat (T. dicoccum L.) is also grown. Bread wheat is produced at slightly higher elevations and on better drained soils than durum wheat, which is primarily found on poorly drained Vertisols (Hailu 1991).Wheat production constraints include low soil fertility, grass weed infestations, waterlogging in Vertisol areas, and water deficits in short season areas (Tanner et al. 1991). Stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis) is common at higher elevations (> 2,400 m); stem rust (P. graminis f. sp. tritici) is more problematic at midelevations (2,000-2,400 m) (Bekele and Tanner 1995).as a promising option for southeastern Ethiopia (Tanner et al. 1994). In the Bale zone of Oromiya Region, the belg rains are sufficiently long and reliable for wheat or other crops. Double cropping could reduce the negative effects of the current practice of alternate season fallows: a continuous crop cover would reduce erosion; alternating crops would help control weeds; and human and animal power could be used more efficiently. To provide an independent estimate of appropriate temperature and rainfall ranges for wheat production zones, values for precipitation and mean minimum temperature during the wettest quarter were obtained for 180 bread wheat germplasm collection sites in Ethiopia (Map 4). It is notable that most collection points fell within the derived wheat production zone.These data also support the lower limits of 350 mm for precipitation and 6°C for minimum temperature (Fig. 2A) used to develop our wheat distribution map.However, the upper limit for minimum temperature proved more problematic, with about half the collection sites exhibiting minimum temperatures over 11°Cand nine sites having values over 15°C. Comparing minimum temperature with elevation (as estimated from the 5 km digital elevation model, not as reported with the germplasm collection data) showed that some collections came from locations well below the suggested 2,000 m limit (Fig. 2B). Further inspection of passport data for bread wheat accessions suggested several possible explanations for these discrepancies.Most accession data did not include information on the type of collection, but in cases where this information was recorded, the seeds often came from markets.Thus, in many cases, samples may have come from locations lower than where their source crops were actually grown. It is also possible that some locations were erroneously recorded. Hijmans et al. (1999) noted that geographic coordinates reported for collection sites exhibit high error rates.The described results must also be qualified in Because water deficits and warm night temperatures seemed to be key factors delimiting bread wheat production areas in Ethiopia, potential new areas for bread wheat production were identified by assuming that technologies could be developed to allow wheat to be grown in drier or warmer environments. For drier conditions, such technologies might include more drought tolerant cultivars, supplemental irrigation from small catchments, or agronomic practices-such as reduced tillage and residue retention-that reduce runoff. Growing wheat under warmer conditions might require cultivars with greater heat tolerance as well as resistance to pathogens that prevail under warmer conditions (e.g., Helminthosporium sativum).Applying the assumption that wheat will grow in areas receiving as little as 300 mm during the wettest quarter resulted in a surprisingly small addition (4%) to the potential wheat production area (Map 5). In contrast, a shift in adaptation to include areas with 2°C warmer minimum temperatures (e.g., up to 13°C) substantially increase potential wheat area (Map 6). The actual impact on total wheat area is impossible to estimate: zones that meet climate criteria may have unsuitable soils or topography or already be used for other, more profitable agricultural pursuits. However, as a rough indicator, increasing the minimum temperature limit by 2°C expanded the potential area suitable for wheat production by 108%.These results seem counter-intuitive, given the popular conception of Ethiopia as an arid, droughtprone country. The principal explanation is that, in terms of wheat cropping and ignoring year-toyear variation, the Ethiopian highlands (to which the wheat crop is so well-adapted) represent a relatively humid environment. Precipitation during the wettest three months is usually well in excess of PET (Table 3; Fig. 1). The ranges of precipitation, PET, and temperature limits used in these similarity analyses (+/-50 mm and +/-1°C) merit examination. The intention was to use a range corresponding to yield differences that are detectable in field trials. For potential grain yield levels of 3,000 to 4,000 kg/ha, this might represent a yield difference of 300 kg/ha. Using 10 years of weather data at Kulumsa, simulations were run to evaluate wheat yield response to precipitation and temperature (Fig. 3). Reducing precipitation from the mean of 540 mm to 490 mm over the growing season decreased yields 430 kg/ha, whereas an increase of 50 mm raised yields 345 kg/ha (Fig. 3A).Reducing the maximum and minimum temperatures during the growing season 1ºC (for a growing season mean at Kulumsa of 16º C) increased wheat yields about 140 kg/ha (Fig. 3B). This was attributable mainly to a slight delay in maturity (120 days vs. 115 days for the actual weather). Increasing temperatures 1ºC decreased wheat yields 130 kg/ha, whereas an increase of 2ºC reduced wheat yields 270 kg/ha.These simulated results suggest that the limits used to define site similarity zones are probably conservative.Figure "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2579155981.json b/main/part_2/2579155981.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6c5f9a5c602c6a0f022a4382bb331219577abea --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2579155981.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ba11c0c71831dd09c3ac6e051fd8ca0f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f8b6bb44-ec81-4f3b-b45b-e6e03c2a6faf/retrieve","id":"105939102"},"keywords":["Ceratonia siliqua L","2 Carob tree","Ceratonia siliqua L"],"sieverID":"35c87c08-5db9-4198-82c7-982151b78c67","content":"and Ukraine. IPGRI's mandate is to advance the conservation and use of plant genetic resources for the benefit of present and future generations. IPGRI works in partnership with other organizations, undertaking research, training and the provision of scientific and technical advice and information, and has a particularly strong programme link with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Financial support for the research agenda of IPGRI is provided by the Governments of Australia,Humanity relies on a diverse range of cultivated species; at least 6000 such species are used for a variety of purposes. It is often stated that only a few staple crops produce the majority of the food supply. This might be correct but the important contribution of many minor species should not be underestimated. Agricultural research has traditionally focused on these staples, while relatively little attention has been given to minor (or underutilized or neglected) crops, particularly by scientists in developed countries. Such crops have, therefore, generally failed to attract significant research funding. Unlike most staples, many of these neglected species are adapted to various marginal growing conditions such as those of the Andean and Himalayan highlands, arid areas, salt-affected soils, etc. Furthermore, many crops considered neglected at a global level are staples at a national or regional level (e.g. tef, fonio, Andean roots and tubers, etc.), contribute considerably to food supply in certain periods (e.g. indigenous fruit trees) or are important for a nutritionally well-balanced diet (e.g. indigenous vegetables). The limited information available on many important and frequently basic aspects of neglected and underutilized crops hinders their development and their sustainable conservation. One major factor hampering this development is that the information available on germplasm is scattered and not readily accessible, i.e. only found in 'grey literature' or written in little-known languages. Moreover, existing knowledge on the genetic potential of neglected crops is limited. This has resulted, frequently, in uncoordinated research efforts for most neglected crops, as well as in inefficient approaches to the conservation of these genetic resources.This series of monographs intends to draw attention to a number of species which have been neglected in a varying degree by researchers or have been underutilized economically. It is hoped that the information compiled will contribute to: (1) identifying constraints in and possible solutions to the use of the crops, (2) identifying possible untapped genetic diversity for breeding and crop improvement programmes and (3) detecting existing gaps in available conservation and use approaches. This series intends to contribute to improvement of the potential value of these crops through increased use of the available genetic diversity. In addition, it is hoped that the monographs in the series will form a valuable reference source for all those scientists involved in conservation, research, improvement and promotion of these crops.This series is the result of a joint project between the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) and the Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK). Financial support provided by the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) of Germany through the German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) is duly acknowledged. The carob tree has been grown since antiquity in most countries of the Mediterranean basin, usually in mild and dry places with poor soils. Its value was recognized by the ancient Greeks, who brought it from its native Middle East to Greece and Italy, and by the Arabs, who disseminated it along the North African coast and north into Spain and Portugal. It was spread in recent times to other Mediterranean-like regions such as California, Arizona, Mexico, Chile and Argentina by Spaniards, to parts of Australia by Mediterranean emigrants and to South Africa and India by the English.The carob tree is an important component of the Mediterranean vegetation and its cultivation in marginal and prevailing calcareous soils of the Mediterranean region is important environmentally and economically. Traditionally, grafted carob trees have been interplanted with olives, grapes, almonds and barley in lowintensity farming systems in most producing countries. Carob pods with their sugary pulp are a staple in the diet of farm animals and are eaten by children as snacks or by people in times of famine. However, currently the main interest is seed production for gum extraction. Kibbled pods have been shipped from producing countries to all over Europe. Because of low orchard management requirements the carob tree is suitable for part-time farming and shows potential for planting in semi-arid Mediterranean or subtropical regions. The trees are also useful as ornamentals and for landscaping, windbreaks and afforestation. Cattle can browse on leaves and the wood is suitable for fuel.World production is estimated at about 310 000 t/year produced from some 200 000 ha with very variable yields depending on cultivar, region and farming practice. Spain is the leading carob producer, producing on average 135 000 t/year (MAPA 1994), followed by Italy, Portugal, Morocco, Greece, Cyprus, Turkey, Algeria and some other countries. A full account of the main carob-producing areas is presented in section 10.Carob has been neglected with respect to both cultural practices and research and development. Apart from a few classic works written by interested scientists like Rullán and Estelrich (1882), Bassa (1896) and Lleó (1901) in Spain, Pereira (1900) and Da Matta (1952) in Portugal, Russo (1954) in Italy, Mitrakos (1988) in Greece, Orphanos and Papaconstantinou (1969) in Cyprus, and various reports especially from Israel (Goor et al. 1958) and the United States (Condit 1919), references on this crop are scarce. We have tried to review most of the work published over the last 100 years and make useful information available to producers, processors, students, scientists and amateurs.The information presented in this publication has been compiled within the context of the carob Research & Development programme conducted at IRTA-Mas Bové since 1984; this has two main aims. The first was to collect and study the genetic resources available in the Mediterranean region and other production areas -IRTA's carob germplasm collection is the widest in the world with over 90 introductions under evaluation. The second aim was to assess the potential yield of this crop when grown in modern orchards with minimum management -a nonirrigated trial in Tarragona, Spain, with 12% of pollinators andwith 500 mm of annual rainfall, is yielding about 5000 kg/ha of pods 10 years after planting.This monograph describes the genetic resources of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) and reviews various aspects of its taxonomy, botany, origin, ecology, properties, uses, diversity and breeding. In addition, a full account of the crop production areas, agronomy, limitations, market, prospects and research needs is presented. An important scope of this work is to contribute to the conservation of the diversity of the cultivated carob and wild relatives. Thus exchange of information as well as germplasm is made possible. The authors hope that the thriving features, current situation of the genetic resources, potential prospects and research needs of carob as a plant and crop for Mediterranean regions are clearly presented.The carob tree grows as a sclerophyllous evergreen shrub or tree up to 10 m high, with a broad semispherical crown and a thick trunk with brown rough bark and sturdy branches (Fig. 1). Leaves are 10-20 cm long, alternate, pinnate, with or without a terminal leaflet. Leaflets are 3-7 cm long, ovate to elliptic, in 4-10 normally opposite pairs, coriaceous, dark green and shiny above, pale green beneath and finely veined with margins slightly ondulate, and tiny stipules. The leaves are sclerophyllous and have a very thick single-layered upper epidermis, the cells of which contain phenolic compounds in the large vacuoles, and stomata are present only in the lower epidermis and arranged in clusters (Mitrakos 1988). Relevant parts of the plant are shown in Figure 2. Carob does not shed its leaves in the autumn but only in July every second year, and it only partially renews leaves in spring (April and May) (Diamantoglou and Mitrakos 1981).The carob is a dioecious species with some hermaphroditic forms; thus male, female and hermaphrodite flowers are generally borne on different trees. Unisexual and bisexual flowers are rare in the inflorescence. The flowers are initially bisexual, but usually one sex is suppressed during late development of functionally male or female flowers (Tucker 1992a); dioecy is not common among Leguminosae. In evolutionary terms, unisexuality is generally regarded as a derived character from bisexual ancestral state. Flowers are small and numerous, 6-12 mm long, spirally arranged along the inflorescence axis in catkin-like racemes borne on spurs from old wood and even on the trunk (cauliflory). Flowers are green-tinted red. Flowers show pentamerous symmetry with calyx but not corolla placed on a short pedicel. The calyx is discshaped, reddish-green and bears nectaries. Female flowers consist of a pistil (6-8.5 mm) on a disk and rudimentary stamens, surrounded by 5 hairy sepals. The ovary is bent, consisting of two carpels 5-7 mm long and containing several ovules. The stigma has 2 lobes. Male flowers consist of a nectarial disk with 5 stamens with delicate filaments surrounded by hairy sepals. In the centre of the disk there is a rudimentary pistil. Hermaphrodite flowers are a combination of both types, containing a pistil and a complement of 5 stamens. Pollen grains released from the anthers are of spheroidal shape and are tetracolpate (Ferguson 1980). Pollen diameter is 28-29 µm at the poles and 25-28 µm at the equator (Ferguson 1980;Linskens and Scholten 1980).The fruit is an indehiscent pod, elongated, compressed, straight or curved, thickened at the sutures, 10-30 cm long, 1.5-3.5 cm wide and about 1 cm thick with blunt or subacute apex (Fig. 3). Pods are brown with a wrinkled surface and are leathery when ripe. The pulp comprises an outer leathery layer (pericarp) and softer inner region (mesocarp). Seeds occur in the pod transversally, separated by mesocarp (Fig. 3). They are very hard and numerous, compressed ovate-oblong, 8-10 mm long, 7-8 mm wide and 3-5 mm thick; the testa is hard and smooth, glossy brown, the hilum minute.The haploid chromosome number of Ceratonia is n=12 and differs from other Cassieae (base number n=14) according to Goldblatt (1981), who suggested it might be aneuploid. Many basic aspects of carob reproductive biology, such as floral biology, pollination compatibility between different sexual types and also cultivars, and flowering and fruiting phenology remain largely unknown. However, progress has been made by McLean Thompson (1944), Russo (1954), Schroeder (1959), Meikle (1977), Leshem and Ophir (1977), Haselberg (1988), Passos de Carvalho (1988), Linskens and Scholten (1980), Retana et al. (1990Retana et al. ( , 1994)), Bosch et al. (1996), Ortiz et al. (1996) and Rovira and Tous (1996). In carob, Condit (1919) reported the tree ratio of female to male is about 50:50 including a few hermaphrodites.Floral morphology of carob is complex. Meikle (1977), from literature and observed specimens in Cyprus, summarized five types of inflorescences:• male, the flowers having long filaments and abortive pistils • male, the flowers having short filaments and abortive pistils • hermaphrodite, the flowers having fully developed stamens and pistils • female inflorescences, the flowers with abortive staminodes and fully developed pistils • polygamous inflorescences, some of the flowers male, some female and some hermaphrodite. Schroeder (1959) grouped into five floral classes 59 carob cultivars growing in California based on the expression of their sex throughout the season. The five groups were: pistillate, pistillate with occasional perfect flowers, perfect with occasional staminate flowers, perfect and staminate. He reported that while adult trees maintained their floral types, young trees showed variation in the development of stamens. The provision of pollinators will prove to be essential for cultivars in the first three groups in order to ensure adequate commercial fruit set. He also noted that cultivars that were hermaphrodite early in the season showed some tendency toward pistil development failure later in the season.A simple carob inflorescence type classification would be:• male inflorescences (Fig. 4a)• female inflorescences (Fig. 4b)• hermaphrodite inflorescence (Fig. 4c). Hillcoat et al. (1980) reported from the available material of C. oreothauma that flowers are either purely male or female with minute, completely sterile, primary anthers. Thus variation in sexuality and morphology of flowers of this species is not as wide as in the cultivated carob.It is difficult to find carob trees of all flower types in naturalized populations of the same area. In the Mediterranean Spanish coast, female and male types are common and hermaphrodite forms rare. However, hermaphrodites are more frequently observed in the Eastern coast of Spain than in the South or in the Algarve in Portugal (Batlle and Tous 1994). In the Balearic Islands the frequency of hermaphrodites is higher than in the Iberian peninsula.There are many different forms of males, but the two main types observed in Italy, Portugal and Spain are often locally named after their anther colour as 'Red' or 'Yellow'. This feature has proven to be insufficient for their classification as it is determined independently of other flower characteristics (Haselberg 1988). It appears that blooming of 'Red' males is more extended than that of 'Yellow' males.The carob is the only Mediterranean tree with the main flowering season in autumn (September-November), similar to many truly tropical plants. However, the time and length of the flowering period depends on local climatic conditions as in most fruit and nut trees. In very hot places male and female trees have been observed in full bloom during June (Leshem and Ophir 1977). Its blooming period in some places overlaps partially with that of the loquat tree (Eriobotrya japonica). The extended flowering season in carob compensates for the unstable weather at that time of the year, and ensures that at least some flowers will be pollinated in a spell of good weather and insect activity. Ceratonia oreothauma flowers in March and April in its native places in which was first reported (Hillcoat et al. 1980). Thus hybridization between both species is only feasible artificially.Pollen transport from staminate to pistillate flowers is effected by insects, mainly bees, flies, wasps and night-flying moths (Retana et al. 1990(Retana et al. , 1994;;Ortiz et al. 1996) but also by wind (Passos de Carvalho 1988;Tous and Batlle 1990). Flowers of all three sexes secrete nectar, though volume of nectar and sugar content is higher in female flowers than in male (Ortiz et al. 1996). Male and hermaphrodite flowers emit a semen-like odour which attracts insects. Different insect groups tend to visit flowers at different hours. Bees are scarce in autumn when carobs are blooming, both in number of species and individuals. How far windborne pollen is effective is unknown, but isolated female trees have produced light crops. Currently, the role of the wind on carob pollen transport is being re-emphasized (Martins-Louçâo et al. 1996a).The developmental stages of both female and male flowers are six and five, respectively, and were first defined and described by Haselberg (1988) (Fig. 5). Flowering and fruiting phenology of some male, female and hermophrodite cultivars have been studied by Retana et al. (1994) and Bosch et al. (1996). Development of inflorescences is more protracted in female and hermaphrodite cultivars (2 months or more) than in male ones (1-1.5 months). So two Spanish female cultivars ('Negret' and 'Rojal') bear inflorescences in as many as six developmental stages, whereas 'Red' and 'Yellow' male trees never carry inflorescences of more than four developmental stages (Retana et al. 1994). Ferguson (1980) reported up to 36% of morphologically abnormal pollen grains in male plants of carob, although this appeared to be unrelated to a reduction in pollen fertility. Sfakiotakis (1978) observed high pollen germination variability in vitro among wild male trees in Crete, their germination percentages ranging from 4.3 to 69%. However, Ciampolini et al. (1986) found less difference in pollen germinability: from 5.2 to 38.6% in males and from 7.1 to 26% in hermaphrodite types. Some pollen abnormality also occurred in C. oreothauma (Ferguson 1980). Leshem and Ophir (1977) reported higher levels of endogenous giberellins in the leaves and inflorescences of female than of male carob trees. In addition, they observed that the switch from vegetative to generative growth in both the male and the female may be associated with a low concentration of endogenous gibberellins in June in a multi-hormone complex (auxin, ethylene, etc.) presumably needed for flower induction. They also found that vegetative spring growth is related to enhanced giberellin activity. Although physiological differences between male and female trees have been described, further research is needed.Female and hermaphrodite inflorescences carry a mean of 17 and 20 flowers, respectively, but few produce a pod and only a small proportion of inflorescences set more than two fruits (Retana et al. 1994). Bosch et al. (1996) found low pod initiation (from 12 to 38%) of 'Negra' and 'Rojal' flowers. The overall fruit set is normally around 3-5% in Italian, Portuguese or Spanish cultivars (Russo 1954;Haselberg 1988;Rovira and Tous 1996). Bosch et al. (1996) observed fruit set to be from 1 to 11% in two consecutive years. Haselberg (1996) observed fruit set of 1% and even 0.05% in years of profuse blooming in 'Mulata'. Haselberg (1996) found a positive correlation between flower intensity and fruit drop and also that pods with a low number of seeds aborted more frequently.Shedding of carob flowers and young fruits occurs mainly from October to December, then slows down during January-February and rarely occurs from June to early August (Bosch et al. 1996;Rovira and Tous 1996). Bosch et al. (1996) observed pod shedding of 59-90% and that it takes place mainly in spring. They reported that on larger inflorescences of the two female cultivars, higher rates of fruit initiation, fruit set and seed set per flower occurred than on smaller inflorescences. Haselberg (1996) reported that variations in flowering intensity and pod yield are likely to be more influenced by endogenous factors related to alternate bearing than by climatic conditions.However, unfavourable environmental conditions may significantly reduce yield by fruit set reduction, thus increasing production risk in marginal growing sites. Ilahi and Vardar (1976) determined that carob pod development follows a sigmoidal growing curve like many other fruits (Fig. 6) and could be divided into three stages. During stage I (slow growth), after fertilization in October and during autumn and winter, the bean shows hardly any weight (fresh and dry) increase. Stage II (fast growth) starts at the beginning of spring when the pod enters an active period of growth (April to June). In stage III the fruit grows slowly, ripens and starts becoming dry in June and changes colour from green to brown. Bosch et al. (1996) reported a similar pattern of pod growth. The pod matures after some 10 months. The green pods are much heavier than the ripe ones, containing about 70% water whereas pod water content at maturity is about 12-18%. The centre of origin of C. siliqua is not clear. It was placed by De Candolle (1883) and Vavilov (1951) in the eastern Mediterranean region (Turkey and Syria). However, Schweinfurth (1894) regarded carob as native to the highlands of southern Arabia (Yemen). More recently it has been considered by Zohary (1973) as originating from a xerotropical Indo-Malesian flora, grouping it with Olea, Laurus, Myrtus, Chamaerops and others and placing the origin of its genus also on the Arabian peninsula. Ceratonia oreothauma, the only known carob-related species, is considered to have its centre of origin in southeast Arabia (Oman) and around the African horn (north of Somalia) (Hillcoat et al. 1980).Climatically the centres of origin of the subfamily Caesalpinoideae were warm and moist initially, but after the Cretaceous period vast drying and elevation of the lands occurred so that cooler, much drier, even desert, conditions evolved. Other caesalpinioid legumes are mainly tropical and subtropical (Cowan 1981). In addition, Mitrakos (1988) suggested that the carob tree seems to have evolved under a climate other than Mediterranean.The original distribution of C. siliqua is not clear as it has undergone extensive cultivation since ancient times. Hillcoat et al. (1980) suggested its range in the wild included Turkey, Cyprus, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, southern Jordan, Egypt, Arabia, Tunisia and Libya and that it moved westward at an early stage. Carob is believed to have been spread by the Greeks to Greece and Italy and then by the Arabs along the coast of northern Africa into the south and east of Spain, from where it migrated to the south of Portugal and the southeast of France. Its wild occurrence in the western Mediterranean is doubtful according to Zohary (1973). Spontaneous carobs occur in many places around the western Mediterranean basin but they are regarded as feral derivatives of the fruit crop which probably evolved under domestication.As a food source, carob pods could be stored and transported long distances. In most of the Mediterranean region wild and naturalized carobs are distributed in more or less the same geographic and climatic belt as the cultivated. Forms of spontaneous carobs are particularly common at low altitudes along the Spanish Mediterranean coast, southwest Spain, southern Portugal, the Balearic Islands, southeast France, the shores of southern Italy including Sicily, the Adriatic coast of Croatia, the Aegean region in Greece and Turkey, along the northern and southern ranges of the isle of Cyprus, in the islands of Malta, in the maritime belt of Lebanon and Israel, the north and south of Morocco and the coastline in Tunisia. The proposed centre of origin and world distribution of carob are presented in Figure 7.The carob tree was likely introduced into the United States from Spain by the US Patent Office in 1854. In the 1950s W. Rittenhouse and J.E. Coit promoted this species in California and introduced budwood of selected cultivars from Cyprus, Israel, Tunisia, Greece, Yugoslavia, Crete, Portugal, Italy and Spain. Seedling trees grown for shade on the streets of cities in southern California and Arizona were selected for commercial production on the basis of their floral and fruit characteristics (Condit 1919;Coit 1949Coit , 1967;;Schroeder 1952;Coit and Rittenhouse 1970;Brooks and Olmo 1972).In Mediterranean countries, the distribution of the evergreen sclerophyllous species like C. siliqua is controlled by winter cold stress (Mitrakos 1981). The closely related species C. oreothauma seems to be even more cold sensitive (J.H. Brito de Carvalho, pers. comm.) and thus its limits are more restricted. Carob is one of the most characteristic and dominant trees in the lower zone (0-500 m and rarely up to 900 m asl) of the Mediterranean evergreen maquis (Zohary and Orshan 1959;Folch i Guillen 1981). In some areas along the shores of the Mediterranean sea, wild carobs occupy places not disturbed by cultivation. Distribution of C. oreothauma is restricted to Oman and Somalia, which might be due to it being an uncultivated species. It is not clear if the distribution of the two related species overlaps. Both species, apart from probable dispersal by animals, are dependent on dispersion by fruit.Scant information is available on the origin and domestication of the carob tree. Liphschitz (1987) reported that early archaeobotanical findings (charred wood and seeds) in Israel showed that the carob existed in the eastern Mediterranean long before the start of Neolithic agriculture (4000 BC), although it is not among the prehistoric species listed by Renfrew (1973). Zohary (1973) suggested that the Mediterranean region has been at least one of its domestication centres. Zohary (1996), on the basis of literature sources and archeological evidence, reported that the carob was brought into cultivation relatively late with the 'second wave' of fruit crops domesticated in the Old World. He attributed this lateness of domestication to the difficulty of propagating carob vegetatively. Remains of carbonized pods have been found in archeological excavations near the Vesuvio volcano in Campania, Italy, post-dating its eruption in AD 79 (Meyer 1980). Zohary and Spiegel-Roy (1975) analyzed two kinds of information -evaluation of fossil evidence and examination of wild relatives of the cultivated crops -and concluded that olive, grapevine, date palm and fig were the first important horticultural crops added to the Mediterranean grain agriculture. These 'first wave' fruit trees were most likely domesticated in the Near East in prehistoric times (4th and 3rd millenia BC); they were very important crops in the Early Bronze Age. Zohary (1996) suggested that similarly to most Old World fruit crops, domestication of C. siliqua was based on shifting from sexual reproduction (in the wild) to vegetative propagation (under cultivation). In carob, as in other fruit and nut trees, the shift to vegetative propagation is the cultivator's solution to the problem of wide variability which is characteristic of sexual reproduction in crosspollinated plants. In addition, as a predominantly dioecious tree, carob includes about 50% males and 1% hermaphrodites (Condit 1919). Thus spontaneous promising seedlings showing superior features have been empirically selected by growers and then clonally propagated. As a consequence, wild carob trees currently growing in Mediterranean countries are not identical to the species type (Mitrakos 1988). Hillcoat et al. (1980) reported that its cultivation in ancient times would have been unnecessary since wild trees were common in the eastern Mediterranean.Wild and escaped carobs reproduce by seed while cultivated varieties are propagated vegetatively as clones. The carob does not root easily by cuttings and is only easily multiplied by budding. The propagation predominantly of female clones can change the sex ratio in a carob-production area. The three main fruit traits that distinguish domesticated carobs from their wild relatives are larger bean size, more pulp and greater sugar content. Increase in the size and number of seeds is less evident. These pod features together with productivity and environmental adaptation seem to have been the most important selection criteria for growers.The small difference in size between the pollen of the two species of this genus seems unlikely to be associated with polyploidy but is more likely to be a result of cultivation (Ferguson 1980;Graham and Barker 1981). Ferguson (1980) reported that similar differences in pollen size between specimens of Olea europaea (cultivated olive) and Olea laperrinei (wild olive) have been observed.The two main carob pod constituents are (by weight): pulp (90%) and seed (10%). Chemical composition of the pulp depends on cultivar, origin and harvesting time (Orphanos and Papaconstantinou 1969;Davies et al. 1971;Vardar et al. 1972;Calixto and Cañellas 1982;Albanell et al. 1991). Carob pulp is high (48-56%) in total sugar content (mainly sucrose, glucose, fructose and maltose) (Table 1). In addition it contains about 18% cellulose and hemicellulose. The mineral composition (in mg/ 100 g of pulp) is: K=1100, Ca=307, Mg=42, Na=13, Cu=0.23, Fe=104, Mn=0.4, Zn=0.59 according to Puhan and Wielinga (1996). Rendina et al. (1969) found the lipids to consist of approximately equal proportions of saturated and unsaturated acids. Vardar et al. (1972) found five amino acids in pod extracts (alanine, glycine, leucine, proline and valine) and Charalambous and Papaconstantinou (1966) also reported tyrosine and phenylalanine. Source: Puhan and Wielinga (1996).Ripe carob pods contain a large amount of condensed tannins (16-20% of dry weight) (Würsch et al. 1984). Feeding trials showed that carob pulp contains only 1-2% digestible protein and is relatively low in metabolizable energy (Vohra and Kratzer 1964). In food value, carob pods are similar to most cereal grains (NAS 1979). The protein has a low digestibility because it is bound with tannins and fibre (Loo 1969). Some researchers have suggested that condensed tannins account for observed growth-depressing effects on animals fed with a diet high in carob meal (Kamarinou et al. 1979) while others believe that this effect is due to its low energy content for which animals can compensate by increasing consumption (Louca and Papas 1973).Constituents of the seed are (by weight): coat (30-33%), endosperm (42-46%) and embryo or germ (23-25%) (Neukom 1988). The seed coat contains antioxidants (Batista et al. 1996). The endosperm is the galactomannan carob bean gum (CBG). It is a polysaccharide molecule composed of mannose and galactose sugar units (ratio 4:1) rather similar to guar gum (ratio 2:1) and tara gum (ratio 3:1) (Fig. 8).The main property of this natural polysaccharide is the high viscosity of the solution in water, over a wide range of temperature and pH (García-Ochoa and Casas 1992). Two other important properties of CBG are its high water-binding capacity to form very viscous stable solutions in high dilution (1% and lower) and its potential interaction with other polysaccharides, having a synergistic effect (Puhan and Weilinga 1996). Functional properties of CBG are given in Table 2. The germ meal, which is obtained from the cotyledons and has a 50% protein content, is suitable for human and animal nutrition (Table 3). Source: Puhan and Wielinga (1996). The carob is one of the most useful native Mediterranean trees. In producing countries, carob pods have traditionally been used as animal and human food and currently the main use is the seed for gum extraction. Carob pods provide fodder for ruminants (Louca and Papas 1973) and nonruminants (Sahle et al. 1992). In the wild, carob shelter, foliage and beans attract browsing animals. The pods contain indigestible and valuable seeds. Carob timber is hard and close-grained, and has been used to make utensils as well as fuel. Carob wood also was traditionally used to make slow-burning charcoal. Ceratonia oreothauma is extensively used for goat fodder in its native ranges (Hillcoat et al. 1980).The pods are used after crushing to separate seed and pulp. The main products derived from the carob pod and some uses are presented in Table 4. The pulp can be ground into a fine powder for use in human nutrition. Carob powder consists of 46% sugar, 7% protein and small amounts of numerous minerals and vitamins and is thus quite nutritious (Whiteside 1981). After oven-drying, the powder can be added to cakes, bread, sweets, ice creams or drinks as a flavouring (NAS 1979;Vidal 1985;Fig. 9a). Carob powder 'cocoa' has advantages over chocolate in that has fewer calories and neither caffeine nor theobromine (Whiteside 1981;Craig and Nguyen 1984). Its flavour is not as rich as dark chocolate but resembles milk chocolate.Owing to the high sugar content of the pod and its relatively low cost, carob pulp was among the first horticultural crops used for the production of industrial alcohol by fermentation in several Mediterranean countries (Merwin 1981). In some countries, e.g. Egypt, carob syrup is a popular drink obtained by extracting carob kibbles with water. Single-cell organisms have been used to convert carob pulp into a high-protein feed; sugar solutions extracted from carob pods are an excellent substrate for culturing fungi such as Aspergillus niger and Fusarium moniliforme and the dried mycelium is a palatable and nutritious feed containing up to 38% crude protein by weight (Imrie 1973;Sekeri-Pataryas et al. 1973).Milled and chopped carob pomace, which are two by-products of the carob molasses industry, were tested in Lebanon as a potting medium for plants and have shown good promise as substitutes for peat-based mixtures in nurseries (Rishani and Rice 1988). The possible use by the food industry of natural antioxidants contained on the carob seed coat as a by-product of the CBG industry recently has raised some interest (Batista et al. 1996).The carob product most widely used, especially for the food industry, is the carob bean gum (CBG), or locust bean gum (LBG). This gum comes from the endosperm of the seed and chemically is a polysaccharide, a galactomannan. By weight, about a third of the seed consists of gum and it is obtained from the kernel after removal of the coat and grinding. One hundred kg of seeds yields an average of 20 kg of pure dry gum (Jones 1953). Carob gum is produced in various degrees of purity depending on how well the endosperm is separated from the embryo and seed coat. Specks of cotyledons and testa are usually present in commercial CBG preparations. For use as a natural food additive, known as E 410, only high grade is admitted; for pet food more residues are allowed.This mucilaginous gum, also known as 'tragasol', is used in a wide range of commercial products as a thickener, stabilizer, binder and gelling or dispersing agent. The food industry uses CBG for the production of a large number of different commodities: ice creams, soups, sauces, cheese, fruit pies, canned meats, confectionery, bakery products and pet foods. Technical applications of CBG include cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, film emulsions, paints, polishes, ceramics and adhesives (Salari 1982;Johnsen et al. 1988;Neukom 1988;Tous and Batlle 1990) and are summarized in Table 5. In the 1980s, CBG applications were: food industry (about 75%) and technical (about 25%); however, this has changed in the 1990s (because of a CBG price increase) to about 90 and 10%, respectively (Batlle 1997). Consumption of hydrocolloids in some European countries and the USA is presented on Table 6.Carob is widely planted as an ornamental and shade tree on the streets of California, Australia and elsewhere; male trees are preferred as they do not provide litter from pod fall. However, the carob's value as a drought-tolerant, airpollution tolerant, low-maintenance tree for street and landscape planting could be limited by the large mature size and strong, invasive roots (Coit 1951;NAS 1979).Carob is now being used in xerogardening in Mediterranean countries. And since it requires little if any cultivation, tolerates poor soils and is long-lived, carob tree is often recommended for reforestation of degraded coastal zones threatened by soil erosion and desertification. It also has been recommended for planting as a windbreak around orchards (NAS 1979;Esbenshade and Wilson 1986) and could even have some use for buffering noise from factories, roads and railways because of its dense foliage. Source: Puhan and Wielinga (1996).8 Genetic resourcesWild carob trees are still frequently found in the most eastern Mediterranean regions and are naturalized in the west. Throughout the Mediterranean region wild or naturalized carob trees in situ were often used as stocks for budding with selected cultivars. In some areas, such as in Mediterranean Turkey or in the south of Spain and countries like Morocco, pods from ungrafted spontaneous trees are collected (Vardar et al. 1980;Ouchkif 1988;Batlle and Tous 1994).Since antiquity, the cultivated carob has been propagated, first by seeds and later by budding too. Thus, carob cultivars originated from chance seedlings selected from local populations and later established in commercial orchards. Zohary (1973) pointed out that the cultivated carob has not diverged much from its wild ancestor. This may be true in some areas but certainly not in all as large morphologic differences in trees and fruit are observed. Carob seedling 'escapes' from plantations into the surrounding countryside are frequently observed.Centuries of cultivation have resulted in a number of local cultivars differing in habit, vigour, size and quality of pods, seed yield, productivity, and pest and disease resistance. Most cultivars are of unknown origin and represent the germplasm of each region. In the world, fewer than 50 named cultivars of limited distribution are reported in the literature (Tous and Batlle 1990). Carob cultivars show high genetic variation in morphologic, agronomic and technologic characters. However, isoenzyme and DNA analyses have revealed low polymorphism between cultivars of different (Tous et al. 1992;Batlle et al. 1996) and the same origin (Barracosa et al. 1996). In addition, cultivated and naturalized carobs were isoenzymically similar (Batlle et al. 1996). This was unexpected as this species is more or less an obligate outcrosser. However, this lack of diversity suggests the narrow origin of the cultivated carob. Thus genetic drift and selection pressure which produce genetic erosion may have represented important drawbacks for the conservation of the genetic variability of this species. Isoenzymic differences in sex (female or hermaphrodite) or patterns of geographical variation were not observed (Tous et al. 1992;Batlle et al. 1996).Female plants always have been selected in preference to the hermaphrodite ones, as they are better pod bearers. The most common cultivars in commercial orchards are female, only a few hermaphrodites having sufficiently desirable attributes. Hermaphrodites are never the main producing trees in orchards, and often, male pollinators are isolated seedling trees or branches left on the rootstocks after budding female cultivars. However, hermaphrodites are of interest as pollinators; some Italian types like 'Bonifacio' and 'Tantillo' were selected for this purpose (Russo 1954) and some Spanish types are being evaluated at IRTA's collection (Tous et al. 1996).The main selection objectives have traditionally been large pod size and high pulp and sugar content. It is known that pulp and seed content show a negative correlation. Thus growers have been selecting against seed yield which is currently more valuable commercially. For this reason some collecting from wild (naturalized) populations has been carried out in Andalusia, Spain (Batlle and Tous 1994;Tous et al. 1995) and should be undertaken in countries like Morocco and Turkey.The most interesting features of the domesticated carob genetic resources are:• low number (less than 50) and antiquity of named cultivars • limited diffusion of cultivars, mainly local • high genetic variation for some traits: -morphological (size, shape and colour of the pod, seed yield, etc.) -agronomical (vigour, habit, resistance to pest and diseases, productivity, etc.) -technological (flavour and sugar content, quality and gum content, etc.) • low polymorphism for molecular markers (isoenzymes and DNA). The main cultivars grown in Spain and in other countries are listed in Tables 7 and 8, respectively. Spanish cultivars are largely characterized by high pulp content and medium seed yield (8-10%). Some cultivars from the Balearic Islands give a high seed yield (16%) and spontaneous ecotypes from Andalusia even higher but the main cultivar 'Negra' yields only around 8%. Italian cultivars tend to have medium pulp and seed content. Most Portuguese cultivars produce medium to high (10-12%) seed yield and beans with round kernels well suited for gum extraction. In Cyprus, carob trees constitute a remarkably uniform group for some features but produce low to high seed content (8-15%) having relatively flat seeds, such as 'Tylliria' which is widely grown (Orphanos and Papaconstantinou 1969). In Turkey, where carob distribution is restricted to the coastal of the Aegean and the Mediterranean, three types of pods can be found (wild, fleshy and 'sisam' or intermediate) (Seçmen 1976). Turkish production is 70% wild type and the rest fleshy and 'sisam', which are considered as grafted (Vardar et al. 1980). In Crete, where Greek production is concentrated and carob trees grow wild and cultivated, there is a wide range of seed yield in cultivars. However, most bean production (around 80%) comes from 'Hemere' which gives a seed yield of 9% (Kalaitzakis et al. 1988). Spontaneous populations from Morocco produce high seed yielding (15%) pods with round kernels and scanty flesh (Ouchkif 1988). In Tunisia most trees are wild (Crossa-Raynaud 1960) so presumably seed yield would be high. The description of 27 cultivars is presented in Appendix I.Information on the morphologic, agronomic and technologic characteristics of carob cultivars is scanty. Most are female and originated at least 100 years ago, presumably as seedling selections. Some work has been done on cultivar description and characterization (Da Matta 1952;Russo 1954;Goor et al. 1958;Coit 1967;Orphanos and Papaconstantinou 1969;Seçmen 1976;Vardar et al. 1980;Carlson 1986;Batlle 1985;Tous 1985;Spina 1986;Crescimanno et al. 1988;Marakis et al. 1988;Batlle and Tous 1990;Tous and Batlle 1990).Carob cultivars vary widely in a number of characteristics which are of commercial importance to growers. Some important agronomic and commercial characteristics of the main carob cultivars are presented in Table 9.To assess and select cultivars for commercial production in Mediterranean countries the following traits should be considered (Tous et al. 1996).On the basis of the flower structure male, female and hermaphrodite cultivars could be recognized. The female cultivars are the most important trees in commercial groves of Mediterranean countries. Males and hermaphrodites are normally used as pollinators. There is no agreement between the different authors on the best density of pollinators for commercial orchards. However, there is sufficient information to recommend around 12% (1:8) of pollinators distributed regularly (as in Fig. 7) (Tous and Batlle 1990). Hermaphrodites have a special value provided that they are self-fertile and/or cross-compatible, so that no space in the orchard needs to be wasted for unproductive male trees.Carob trees grow best in calcareous soils, preferably near the sea. They are drought resistant but tolerate only light frost. Sensitivity to frost is a serious problem in this crop. The extent of frost damage depends on the temperature within the orchard and the physiological state of the trees. As several spells of frost have occurred in various places since records began, some cultivar differences have been observed. The Portuguese cultivar 'Galhosa' seems to be more cold tolerant than 'Mulata' (Brito de Carvalho 1988a). In Andalusia ungrafted local types known as 'Bravia' seem more tolerant than the grafted cultivars (Tous et al. 1995). Susceptibility to wind is revealed by broken branches after storms. It is related to wood health, tree shape and size and thus to cultivar and management.High yield is an important characteristic for farmers, but regular bearing also has to be considered as most cultivars show alternate bearing, such as 'Amele di Bari' in Italy (Crescimanno 1982), 'Tylliria' in Israel (Goor et al. 1958) and 'Cacha', 'Negra' and some hermaphrodite cultivars in Spain (Martorell 1987;Tous and Batlle 1990). In addition to these genetic traits, other factors affect yield, such as amount of pollination, cultural practices, environmental conditions (dry or irrigated orchard), etc. The trait precocity is highly desirable in carob to reduce the otherwise unproductive vegetative phase of the first years and to pay off quickly the costs of establishment. Some cultivars start to bear early, 4 to 5 years after budding ('Rojal', 'Ramillete', 'Mulata', 'AIDA', etc.), while others bear some years later ('Banya de Cabra', 'Cacha', 'Sandalawi', etc.). Regarding the vegetative period of cultivars held in Spanish carob collections it was observed that the hermaphrodite types normally bear sooner (2nd to 3rd year after budding) than female cultivars (Navarro 1992;Tous et al. 1993Tous et al. , 1996)). Graça (1996), in trials with 'Mulata' in the Algarve, Portugal, budded the year before planting, obtained significant pod production (11.2 kg/ha) 5 years after establishment. Most cultivars begin bearing early when orchard management and rainfall, or supplementary water, are adequate.The quality of beans depends mainly on the seeds and the pulp in which the seeds are embedded. Seeds are currently the most important part of the pods as they are used to extract the valuable carob bean gum (CBG). Pulp value depends on its use (livestock feed or human food industry) and the contents of sugar, fibre, tannins and flavour (Coit 1961). Chemical composition of carob pods differs widely according to cultivar and climate. Thomson (1971) found in 40 cultivars the following percentage ranges by weight at 10% moisture: total sugars (37-62%), crude protein (2.2-6.6%), crude fibre (4.2-9.6%) and ash (1.5-2.4%). Pods also contain from 0.46 to 1.46% crude fat (Binder et al. 1959) and 2.6-6.7% tannins by dry weight (Louca and Papas 1973;Marakis et al. 1988).The pulp is the main constituent of the pod. Pulp content in the pod ranges from 73 to 95% (Caja et al. 1988;Crescimanno et al. 1988;Marakis et al. 1988), with corresponding seed contents. Seed yield is an important fruit characteristic that varies with climatic and soil conditions but is also strongly cultivar related (Brito de Carvalho 1988a). Wild carobs have produced higher seed yield than cultivated (Marakis et al. 1988;Di Lorenzo 1991;Tous et al. 1995). In Mediterranean cultivars the variation recorded ranges from 5 to 27% (Caja et al. 1988;Crescimanno et al. 1988;Marakis et al. 1988). Albanell et al. (1996) observed that number of kernels per pod is more important than length or weight and in relation to gum content they found that seeds should be heavy, thick and short.The content and quality of gum are also important features. They vary with climate, soil and cultivar (Brito de Carvalho 1988a). Endosperm, from which the gum is derived, ranges from 42 to 60% in dry weight (Albanell et al. 1988;Crescimanno et al. 1988). Ungrafted trees seem to produce seeds with more gum content than cultivars (Marakis et al. 1988). Gum content differs considerably between cultivars. Under the same environmental conditions cultivars 'Duraio', 'Matalafera' and 'Galhosa' produce more gum than 'Rojal', 'Melera' and 'Negra' (Tous et al. 1996). There are also cultivar-related differences in gum quality, especially regarding viscosity grade, gel strength and content of galactomannans. The current trend is to grow good dual-purpose cultivars (pulp and kernel), so that high production of carob kernel can be avoided in the future to stabilize the CBG market.Pulp flavour is also an important consideration for carobs grown for the food industry. A test on pulp flavour of 31 cultivars, ranging from 37.1 to 51.6% of total sugar (reported as glucose), indicated that flavour preference is not directly related to high sugar content. The hermaphrodite cultivar 'Santa Fe' was rated highest; it has a sweet, nutty flavour and high sugar content (47.5%) (Binder et al. 1959). Carobs of the better cultivars contain 45-55% of total sugar; poor cultivars contain 35-45%.Harvesting is the major cost in carob production owing to the expensive and scarce labour in most developed countries. Manual harvesting of the pods represents 30-35% of the total production cost for an orchard (Orphanos 1980;Tous 1995b). This cost can be divided between knocking (or shaking) and collecting operations. Knocking is a traditional operation performed with thin long poles to knock down ripe pods. Manual or mechanical harvesting by trunk shakers and manpower shakers is affected by size and growth habit of the trees, pod distribution in the branches and pod abscission. Collecting operations depend on yield, size and shape of pod, and orchard density. The main aim for new carob orchard establishment should be mechanical harvesting. Some agronomical features of the tree are important to improve mechanical harvesting of carob.Current cultivars, especially when well-managed in warm coastal climates, can reach a large size (6 m high) and the fruit-bearing branches usually droop, obstructing trunk shakers used in mechanical harvesting. Small trees make harvest easier. In respect of growth habit there are big differences between cultivars (Table 9, Fig. 10). The current need, if shakers are to be used, is to grow trees (orchard density about 150 trees/ha), which are reduced in size, with upright growth habit and rigid fruit-bearing branches (Tous et al. 1996).The physiological ripening of the pods starts in May-June and is a gradual process closely related to natural fruit drop. These two phenomena can affect harvest efficiency. Some cultivars are more prone to fruit abscission than others when knocked or shaken. For example 'Matalafera', 'Rojal', 'AA2' and 'Banya de Cabra' are more prone to abscise pods than 'Negra', 'Tylliria' and 'Ramillete'. Generally, hermaphrodite types need greater force for fruit removal than female cultivars (Tous 1985).The main consideration should be to choose cultivars that produce pods which ripen simultaneously during the period of maximum abscission, to ease collection from the ground. Early ripening cultivars would avoid not only flower damage with the sticks but also rainfall which is frequent at harvesting time (September-October) in Mediterranean countries. Fruit shape and size Carob bean size is a highly variable character influenced by many environmental factors as well as level of pollination and fruit set. Generally, grafted cultivars produce larger fruits than unselected wild types. This trait eases both manual and mechanical harvesting. Pod shape is also highly variable (Table 9, Fig. 11). For easier and cheaper collection, straight fruits are preferred to curved or twisted pods (Brito de Carvalho 1988a). The easiest pods to collect are large and straight. Carob pod size is also important for resistance to strong winds in spring to prevent premature fruit drop.The most promising female cultivars studied at IRTA are: 'Rojal', 'Duraió', 'Mulata', 'AIDA' and 'Sayalonga'. Other cultivars like 'Banya de Cabra', 'Matalafera', 'Galhosa' and 'Tylliria' also show some commercially interesting characteristics (Tous et al. 1996). As promising hermaphrodite pollinating cultivars, 'Clifford', 'Santa Fe', 'Ramillete' and 'A-19' can be considered. Some outstanding cultivars from different origins like 'Amele', 'Sfax', 'Tylliria', 'Casuda', 'Santa Fe' and 'Clifford' perform well in many countries. This shows that carob cultivars are able to adapt outside their region of origin.The main aim is conservation of variability through a wide range of different genotypes and, less so, individual genotype preservation. Currently, there are eight field carob collections in the world (Table 10, Appendix II). The best documented is maintained at IRTA-Mas Bové, Spain and is supported by the Spanish Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA). This Germplasm Bank comprises field collections placed in two sites, Reus and Tortosa (80 km away), with two types of Mediterranean climate (Tortosa is warmer than Reus). Altogether 93 cultivars and selections from eight origins are held for evaluation. There is some duplication to safeguard against frost damage. a Source: modified from Tous et al. (1996).Once the field collections were established and accessions identified, the main aim has been to characterize the material and assess the genetic variability of important characters, particularly morphologic, agronomic (precocity, growth habit, production, pest and disease resistance, etc.) or commercial (kernel yield, pulp and gum quality, etc.). Such studies could be extended by trials with selected cultivars. However, this approach has hardly been used for carob and only a few trials are known.After recording passport data for each new accession, identification and characterization are carried out according to an adapted version of the descriptor list developed by the authors and completed with isoenzyme records (Tous et al. 1992;Batlle et al. 1996). So far, in the 1995-96 cropping year 15 cultivars have started bearing at Reus and 6 at Tortosa. The preliminary results (8th year after budding) indicate that the female cultivars 'Rojal', 'Banya de Cabra' and 'Ralladora' and hermaphrodite accessions 'Misto Sta. Bárbara', 'Ramillete' and 'A-19' are promising (Tous et al. 1996). Several very promising cultivars have yet to be fully assessed. Passport data of all introduced cultivars are available as well as some evaluation data.Apart from the main Germplasm Bank at IRTA, Spain has two other carob collections. They were started after surveying and cataloguing carob genetic resources in Castellón, Valencia and Alicante (Navarro 1992) and the Balearic Islands (Tous et al. 1996). The Valencian collection is located in Villajoyosa, Alicante and holds 135 accessions and the other is in Palma, Majorca with 40 accessions. The Villajoyosa collection, which holds an important number of hermaphrodite types, is at risk of being lost as it is placed on private land and accessions are not freely available. Records of these two collections are scarce and generally limited to their origin.The carob field collection of the Associaçao Interprofissional para o Desenvolvimento da Produçao e Valorizaçao da Alfarrova (AIDA) in Tavira, Portugal contains 13 cultivars, documented with passport and evaluation data. For the other three living collections, it should be noted that only very limited information is available. In the Tunisian collection at INRAT Ariana, Crossa-Raynaud (1960) reported that at least one tree of the local cutivar 'Sfax' was still available. The Californian collection is kept in a public garden at San Diego. In addition, carob as a species is represented in most botanical gardens of the Mediterranean region.A carob germplasm collection of some 60 clones was assembled by J.E. Coit in 1949 near Vista, California, holding both North American selections and Mediterranean cultivars, but it was lost in the 1970s owing to housing development (Coit and Rittenhouse 1970). In Cyprus, in the 1950s a large cultivar collection was established at Xylotimbou with the purpose of cultivar characterization (Ticho 1958). However this early collection was also lost some decades later (P.I. Orphanos, pers. comm.). These two genebanks were the first recorded attempts to maintain and characterize carob genetic resources in the world and presumably some accessions were lost after their removal.Duplications of cultivars exist in field collections but not of wild material. Each country should concentrate on the conservation of its native resources. Information on gaps in the existing germplasm collections is largely unknown. However the expected genetic variation contained in heterogeneous species has not been found within the cultivated material in some ex situ collections (Tous et al. 1992;Batlle et al. 1996). As most of the remaining carob natural populations contain high seed yielding genotypes, initiatives should be taken to conserve this potentially interesting wild material. Among the gaps, the lack of any wild material from Morocco and Turkey is probably the most important. The existing naturalized populations of the south of Spain were surveyed and genotypes collected recently (Batlle and Tous 1994;Tous et al. 1995). Hermaphrodite genotypes are of particular interest for collection.The threat of genetic erosion on carob seems moderate. However in some places like Murcia in the southeast of Spain, Rodriguez and Frutos (1988) reported 37% of trees lost, mainly due to replacement of carob by more intensive crops in newly irrigated areas. Vinterhalter et al. (1992) used tissue culture in an attempt to propagate genotypes which were almost extinct in Croatia.In vitro micropropagation, as a way of conserving outstanding trees, has been developed by Sebastian and McComb (1986) in Australia and by Alorda and Medrano (1996) in Spain. Androulakis (1994) attempted to propagate selected types by in vitro culture in Crete. Only limited success has been achieved using these methods.The wild species C. oreothauma (with its two subspecies) is not represented in the existing field collections. It is only conserved ex situ as a few potted trees in a greenhouse at The Royal Botanical Gardens Kew, in London, England. It was botanically studied by Hillcoat et al. (1980) in its native ranges. In 1991 a collecting expedition in the mountains of northern Oman was carried out by IBPGR in collaboration with the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food of that country; 6 accessions were collected (IBPGR 1992).To date, improvement of carob cultivars has been carried out only empirically by growers selecting promising chance seedlings and budding them onto less fruitful genotypes as rootstocks. The lack of any planned carob breeding programmes may be due to its relatively minor importance.Breeding programmes mean considerable costs associated with raising and selecting progenies, and as more than 8 years may elapse from seed to flower, progress can only be slow. In due course the use of molecular markers, particularly for sex, could speed early selection and thus the process. However, the breeding system including pollination mechanisms and expression of sexuality in response to environmental conditions is not well understood.Clonal variability in old carob cultivars could be exploited by selecting the best clones which have accumulated different spontaneous mutations over a long period of time. Clonal selection is a valuable approach when used for a cultivar which has achieved commercial success. In Spain, some work is underway with 'Rojal'. It might also be interesting to make some clonal selection in cultivars like 'Duraió' if morphologic or agronomic variation is observed.The chosen objectives will depend on the use envisaged for the resulting cultivars. The main challenges for carob improvement are: to reduce vegetative period (i.e. increase precocity in bearing) and to increase cold hardiness, and pod and seed yield. Other features like vigour, productivity, uniform ripening, easy harvesting, kernel size and shape, content and quality of pulp and gum are also important.Some differences in cold tolerance appear between carob genotypes (Brito de Carvalho 1988a; Tous et al. 1995), but as reported in the Genetic Resources section, there are no records of deliberate collection of types from the colder places. This variability has not been exploited and may not be enough to select adapted types for different environments and crossing. Wider adaptation through interspecific hybridization seems difficult to achieve as hardy carob-related species are unknown.Conventional breeding by controlled crosses has not been reported in carob, only empirical selection by growers looking for productive trees of sweet and fleshy pods in the wild. Identification and propagation of superior phenotypes in natural populations of chance seedlings, mainly based on seed yield performance, is an alternative as in some regions of Morocco and Turkey large wild populations still remain untouched.As carob is largely a dioecious species, genetic improvement for fruit characters is hampered by lack of information for the male parent regarding these characters. However the use of hermaphrodite types to cross together or with female cultivars seems feasible so that both potential parents could be chosen after fruit assessment.Mass selection after intercrossing the best individuals on the basis of their phenotypes would be the simplest method. This is based on the relatively high additive variance affecting the inheritance of most traits in fruit and nut trees (Bringhurst 1983). No inheritance of a character has been described in carob. Choice of parents with complementary characters from diverse geographical regions and available in ex situ collections should be criteria to be considered.Information on pollen and seed management, hybridization and handling seed populations has not been reported for carob, and thus should be adapted from other fruit and nut tree crops. Pollen collection is easy and it seems storable in a fridge for several months (M. Rovira, pers. comm.). Pollen application with brush or fingers is feasible, flower insect exclusion is necessary. Seed germination and tree raising are described in the Agronomy section Interspecific crosses between C. siliqua and C. oreothauma have not been reported, but would be worth trying. Both species have the same chromosome number (2n=24) (Hillcoat et al.1980). However, knowledge about C. oreothauma and its genetic potential is still very limited. As C. oreothauma is adapted to higher altitudes (1500-1800 m asl) than carob, Hillcoat et al. (1980) suggested that a cross between them would produce a more useful forage plant. However, C. oreothauma may be less hardy than carob (J.H. Brito de Carvalho, pers. comm.) in which case any hybrids are likely to be hardy. As rooting potential is inherited and, if C. oreothauma shows higher rooting potential than carob, it would be incorporated through hybridization, but hybrid seedlings would only be useful if are hardy and show good adaptation.As indicated earlier carob production has a long tradition, mainly for animal feeding, in most countries bordering the Mediterranean sea. It is thought the Greeks and Arabs were responsible for the spread of carob within the Mediterranean basin from the Near East. More recently, it was introduced in different periods in some warm semi-arid zones of Australia, California, Arizona, Chile, Mexico, South Africa, etc. However, commercial carob production is currently concentrated in the Mediterranean region.The total carob-production area in the world is around 200 000 ha (Table 11) of which the southern countries of the European Union (Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece) with some 148 000 ha account for 74% of the growing area and about 70% of the world production (Table 12). Source: Batlle (1997).Commercial world production of carob pods is estimated currently around 310 000 t, and it is mainly concentrated in Spain, Italy, Portugal, Morocco, Greece, Cyprus, Turkey, Algeria and other countries (Table 12). There is some production in Croatia, Tunisia and Malta and small amounts are also produced in Australia, California and South Africa. Pod and seed production in different countries are not parallel because of differences in seed yields of cultivars and wild types.Carob production in the world has declined dramatically over the past 50 years, from 650 000 t in 1945 (Orphanos and Papaconstantinou 1969) to 310 000 t today. In Spain alone, production has fallen by 400 000 t, from 550 000 t in 1930 to 150 000 t in 1990 (MAPA 1994). The main reasons are low prices coupled with farming mechanization and coastal planning development. Farmers' interest in carob in most Mediterranean countries diminished because of low pod prices and home consumption, and use of coastal land for roads, housing development and industrial estates (Batlle 1997). In the past, carob expansion in Spain took place in two main phases: first the agricultural development during the 17th century when marginal lands were brought into use, and later when vineyards were pulled out because of a phylloxera outbreak in the 19th century and were replaced by this crop in coastal areas (Tous and Batlle 1990). The largest growing area (190 000 ha) was reached in the 1930s (MAPA 1994). Spanish production has halved between 1970and 1995(MAPA 1994)). The current Spanish growing area and production (82 100 ha and 135 000 t) is distributed in five regions: C. Valenciana (54 200 ha and 60 500 t), Catalonia (12 700 ha and 28 000 t), Balearic Islands (12 200 ha and 30 500 t), Andalusia (1000 ha and 11 000 t) and Murcia (2000 ha and 5000 t) (MAPA 1994). There are estimated to be 182 000 isolated trees (not in orchards), some of which are intercropped with other species such as almonds, olives, figs, grapevines, etc. An important number of naturalized trees thrive in Andalusia.Carob production in Italy (45 000 t) is mainly located in the island of Sicily (provinces of Ragusa, 21 000 t; Siracusa 11 000 t; elsewhere, 5000 t) and the mainland (Apulia and Campania, 8000 t). Production in Sardinia is negligible. Italian production has halved between 1955 and 1995. The current tendency is to reduce the area (Licitra 1996).The carob-growing region in Portugal is concentrated in the south with some 21 000 ha and 30 000-35 000 t of production, depending on years (Droste 1993). The Algarve is the main producing region and around 60% of the total surface is located in four places: Silves (3200 ha), Faro (3000 ha) and Loulé and Tavira with 2500 ha each. In the Alentejo region there are also some orchards in Mértola (100 ha) (Martins-Louçâo and Brito de Carvalho 1989). The Portuguese carob production has declined over the past 20 years and the area under cultivation has reduced by at least 25% (Droste 1993).Carob production in Morocco has increased over the last 15 years and it is estimated to be about 26 000 t (Batlle 1997). The main spontaneous populations are concentrated in the regions of Tafechma in the north and Ait Ishaq in the south (Ouchkif 1988). However, three areas are commercially known: Fes, Marrakech and Agadir. Acreage of spontaneous carob in Morocco is estimated around at 30 000 ha. Carobs thrive together with a number of other species of the maquis (Pistacia, Olea, Quercus, etc.). Some new orchards have recently been planted and Moroccan production is expected to rise moderately in the coming years. Carob pod production in Tunisia is also from spontaneous trees and was estimated in the 1950s to be about 2800 t (Crossa-Raynaud 1960); however, no records are available since then.Total Turkish production is about 15 000 t, which is collected from isolated trees (360 000) as there are no carob orchards. The production is concentrated along the coast in the Aegean (4%) and Mediterranean (96%) regions from Urla (Izmir) to Samandag (Hatay) (Vardar et al. 1980). The main producing provinces are Içel, Antalya, Mugla, Adana, Burdur and Aydin.In Israel, Goor et al. (1958) reported some 250 000 carob trees scattered in forests. In the early 1950s about 2000 ha were planted either as groves, on grazing land, as forests or as roadside trees. Currently some plantings are still productive but the tonnage seems to be decreasing.In California during the 1950s there was a well-publicized 'Carob crusade' promoting this species as a dryland crop needing little irrigation, and several plantings were made throughout the south. However, mainly owing to low productivity of the tree under dryland culture and the high cost of land and processing, the project failed (Coit and Rittenhouse 1970;Ferguson and Arpaia 1990).In Australia, the crop was introduced around 1850 by Mediterranean emigrants. However, it was only in the 1980s that interest in carob led to planting some orchards, mainly in Western and South Australia but also in New South Wales and Victoria. The Australian carob-growing area is only about 170 ha and there are also some 30 000 isolated trees. Its production is estimated to be around 750 t per year (Tous 1995a).The carob is a long-lived evergreen and thermophilous tree thriving in habitats with mild Mediterranean climates. It grows well in warm temperate and subtropical areas, and tolerates hot and humid coastal areas. Carob and orange trees have similar temperature requirements but carob tolerates poorer soils and needs much less water. The carob tree is more tender than the olive. For resistance to dry environments it is surpassed only by pistachio (Evreinoff 1955). It is also a xerophytic species well adaptated to the ecological conditions of the Mediterranean region, by virtue of its efficient hydric regulation by stomatic adjustment and its foliar structure and anatomy (Catarino et al. 1981). Leaf wax synthesis increases in dry conditions reducing cuticular permeability and thus protecting the plant from excess transpiration (Baker and Procopiu 1980). Carob, together with Pistacia lentiscus L. and Olea europaea L. var. sylvestris, forms one of the most characteristic associations of the lowest zone of the Mediterranean vegetation and thus is considered to be a climax community (Oleo-Ceratonion).Like other Mediterranean species with long-lived leaves and an extended flowering period, mechanisms have evolved that optimize water, carbon and nitrogen use for reproduction (Correia and Martins-Louçâo 1995). Several studies have shown that carob trees can maintain stomata open and high leaf water content even under low soil water availability (Nunes et al. 1989). This is allowed by a sharp reduction of leaf water potential in response to small water losses (Lo Gullo and Salleo 1988).The two main growing flushes are in spring and autumn as in most Mediterranean trees. Vegetative growth slows below 10°C. Thus, it seems that this species enters some kind of 'light' dormancy, at least in most cool latitudes. However in some very warm places and under favourable conditions, carob grows without becoming dormant either in winter or summer (Liphschitz and Lev-Yadun 1988). The cambium can be active throughout most of the year (Fahn 1953), or all year with low rates of activity in January (Arzee et al. 1977). Investigations on the annual rhythm of cambial activity in Italy by Scaramuzzi et al. (1971) showed that cambium is active from February to the end of September and inactive during winter months owing to low temperatures.The rooting habit of carob is similar to pistachio; its extensive root system penetrates the soil deeply. Carob develops roots under stressful conditions to explore deeper soil layers where water may be available (Christodoulakis 1992). It can thus survive long periods of drought. In addition, Nunes et al. (1989) reported that carob leaves can maintain turgor under situations of soil drought, using different strategies according to the season.Although the carob tree is a legume, like most Caesalpinioideae it does not nodulate and thus is unable to fix nitrogen (Martins-Louçâo and Rodríguez-Barrueco 1982;Martins-Louçâo 1985). Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi have been shown to colonize carob roots, but no ectomycorrhizal association was found (Martins-Louçâo et al. 1996b). The colonization by AM can increase nitrogen uptake by the plant. Since carobs often grow on nutrient-deficient soils lacking nitrogen and phosphorus in particular, AM fungi can improve nutrition.Areas suitable for carob should have a subtropical Mediterranean climate with cool, not cold, winters, mild to warm springs, and warm to hot dry summers. These Mediterranean-like areas range from approximately 30° to 45° in northern latitudes (Mediterranean basin, California and Arizona) and between 30° and 40° in southern latitudes (Australia, South Africa and Chile).Adult trees require no winter chilling; they can be damaged when temperatures fall below -4°C and can only withstand winter temperatures of not lower than -7°C. However, trees can withstand summer temperatures of 40°C and hot dry winds. From 5000 to 6000 hours above 9°C are needed for pods to ripen. Strong winds can break adult tree branches and detach pods. Wind can also damage young trees (Tous and Batlle 1990). Autumn rains can interfere with pollination and affect fruit set. High humidity in spring promotes Oidium infection on both leaves and pods.Carob trees can adapt to a wide range of soil types from poor sandy soils and rocky hillsides to deep soils, but they cannot withstand waterlogging although the root system is usually deep. In areas with shallow rocky soils, tree size and productivity are reduced. The best soils are sandy well-drained loams but calcareous soils with high lime content are also suitable. Carob also appears to tolerate salinity well (Rebour 1971). Winer (1980) reported tolerance to a soil salt content of up to 3% NaCl.Carob, as a xerophyte, can survive dry climates without irrigation and is well adapted to dry environments with annual average rainfall between 250 and 500 mm per year (Tous and Batlle 1990). It has developed some drought-resistance mechanisms (Nunes et al. 1989;Salleo and Lo Gullo 1989) as mentioned in the Agronomy section. Although drought resistant, carob trees do not bear commercial crops unless they receive at least 500-550 mm per year (NAS 1979), but 350 mm of annual rainfall are considered enough for fruit set (Coit 1949;Ticho 1958;Crescimanno 1982).12 Agronomy 12.1 Propagation Carob rootstocks are raised from open-pollinated seeds and these seedling rootstocks vary widely in vigour, habit and cold resistance. No rootstock trials have been carried out and no rootstock selections are available. It is essential that rootstocks produce a well-developed rooting system. The seedling stocks should be budded 1 year after germination, in the nursery, or 2 years from germination, after planting in the orchard. Vegetative propagation by cuttings is not yet commercially available. Young seedlings are very sensitive to frost damage and thus in frosty places they should be protected.The seeds used for sowing should be completely ripe and extracted from pods of the last harvest. Sowing should be done early in the spring, about March-April. Before sowing, the light, empty or wormy seed should be removed; this can be done by soaking in water when most of the faulty seeds float on the surface and can be easily removed. Although carob seeds have remained viable for as long as 5 years stored dry at low temperatures in sealed containers (Goor and Barney 1968;Hong et al. 1996) it is advisable to use seeds from the current season. Seeds are presumably viable after passing through an animal's digestive tract.Carob seeds germinate easily, but as the coat is very hard they require scarification with acid or hot water treatment. Germination can be hastened by treating them with tap water, boiling water, sulphuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) or gibberellic acid (GA 3 ). Carob seeds do not need to be kept in a cold store to break dormancy. At IRTA-Mas Bové good results were obtained using fresh seed sown in March-April, with any of the following methods or combinations of methods:• soaking in tap water at room temperature for 15 days • soaking in boiling water, stirring briskly for 10 minutes and then immersion in cold water for 24 hours • soaking in concentrated sulphuric acid for 1 hour and then rinsing with tap water to prevent complete digestion of the seed coat • soaking in gibberellic acid (25 ppm) for 24 hours. Frutos (1988) scarified carob seeds with sulphuric acid solutions (10, 20, 30, 40 and 80%) for 30 minutes and then soaked them in water for 24 hours and placed them in Petri dishes at 23°C; he obtained the best germination (99.1%) using sulphuric acid at 80%. However, he observed no effects on seed germination after treatment with GA 3 at 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg/L for 24 hours. After treatment and washing, seeds are usually soaked for another 1-2 hours before planting and are sometimes surface-sterilized with dilute bleach. After soaking, water is drained away and the seeds are sown either into polyethylene trays on greenhouse benches and kept at 20-30°C or directly into tall plastic pots (12-15 cm diameter and 35-40 cm deep) placed outside under shading.Optimum temperature for carob seed germination was found to be 25°C by De Michele et al. (1988) and 27.5°C by Mitrakos (1981). However, in its native ranges when these temperatures prevail (June-September) no water is available. It seems likely that some germination occurs naturally in November and seedlings survive when winter is mild (Mitrakos 1988). There is good evidence from Hillcoat et al. (1980) that the optimum temperature for C. oreothauma seed germination is similar to that reported for carob. Work on the effect of water stress on germination has been done by Spyropoulos and Lambiris (1980).Different potting mixtures can be used. They usually contain soil, humus, perlite and peat moss in various ratios, and are usually amended with sand to improve drainage and structure. The germinated seed should be watered regularly, but not overwatered, as this can result in damping-off and root rot diseases. The benches on which the trays are placed should be clean and sterile, as several pathogens can survive on dirty benches and infect young carob rootstock seedlings. Care should be taken when handling seedlings.Carob has been described by Lee et al. (1977) and Hartmann and Kester (1983) as difficult to root. Its adventitious rooting potential is low, but rooting has been obtained on subterminal hardwood cuttings (2 or 3 years old) (Fig. 12a), after treatment with sulphuric acid and a high concentration of hormone (IBA or IBA combined); a rooting bench containing perlite and fitted with bottom heat (24±1°C) and mist (once every 2 min during the day) was used (Alorda et al. 1987). It appears that three aspects of the cuttings are important for rooting: time of collecting (seasonal variation), type of shoot (age and position) and genotype (rooting potential). Alorda andMedrano (1988) in Majorca, Spain, andCabrita et al. (1988) in the Algarve, Portugal, observed the highest rooting percentage in March cuttings while for Fadl et al. (1979) in Egypt it was in April. Regarding genotype the best rooting percentages were obtained by Alorda and Medrano (1988) using 'De la Mel' (syn. 'Negrillo') (85%) and one local hermaphrodite selection (45%) and by Cabrita et al. (1988) using 'Galhosa' (44%) rather than 'Mulata' (27%). Alorda and Medrano (1988) reported success after transplanting to the field with irrigation while Cabrita et al. (1988) described plant failure after transplanting to a soil mixture under greenhouse conditions. De Michelle and Occorso (1988) in Sicily obtained the highest rooting percentage (57.9%) using semihardwood cuttings with leaves taken in March and treated with IBA (8000 ppm).Micropropagation of carob using both juvenile and adult tissues has been attempted (Martins-Louçâo and Rodriguez-Barrueco 1982;Sebastian and McComb 1986;Vinterhalter et al. 1992;Androulakis 1994;Alorda and Medrano 1996). However, there are no reports of plants from in vitro culture being successfully established in the field.It seems that vegetative propagation by cuttings has not yet been successfully resolved in carob to give consistent results and thus to be suitable for mass production in commercial nurseries. The information available on cutting propagation is more useful now than 15 years ago. Attempts have been made but it has not yet been solved. Research is underway at IRTA. If an easy way to root cuttings is developed, propagation of cultivars would be simpler and much cheaper.Seedling rootstocks, before or after budding, are usually planted from pots directly into the orchard. As carob is an evergreen and seedlings are sensitive to frost and root drying, late transplanting in February or March is recommended after danger of frost is past; the use of bare-rooted trees is not advisable.Trees with well-developed roots should be used for transplanting (Fig. 12b) and proper care during and after planting is essential. Unlike other fruit trees, carobs are not usually budded in the nursery; field budding 1 year after planting has proven superior for vigour. The plastic pot is removed by cutting it from the top to the bottom with a sharp knife. Trees should be well watered immediately after planting, and soil moisture should extend below the root zone. This also helps to eliminate air pockets. A second irrigation follows within 2 weeks, followed by regular fertilization, using mainly nitrogen in the ammonium form rather than nitrate because of its easier uptake (Cruz et al. 1993). Rootstocks should be staked on the downwind side to ensure straight tree growth for budding and to protect them from excessive wind, which is common in coastal areas around the Mediterranean. It is essential to water 2 or 3 times during the first summer after planting in the orchard to wet the root mass and adjacent soil for successful establishment and for growth to reach a good size for budding the following spring.The potential use of C. oreothauma as rootstock for carob seems not feasible as it is more tender than the cultivated species (J.H. Brito de Carvalho, pers. comm.).Scion cultivars are propagated with standard budding techniques. Some research on this matter has been reported (Brito de Carvalho and Graça 1988;Tous and Batlle 1990). The main types of budding used are T-bud, chip bud and patch bud. Budding is usually done in spring (from April to early June) when the scion buds are mature and the bark on the rootstock is slipping and active. When planting a new carob orchard, rootstocks are planted in late February or March and usually budded the following year in spring.T-budding is the most efficient and common method in spring (April-May) with well-developed buds from scion wood of the year before on rootstocks of 1-2 cm diameter. Patch budding requires a larger rootstock diameter (bigger than 2 cm) and is thus more likely to be made in the field in spring or autumn. Bud take in rootstocks of less than 1 cm of diameter is low. Chip budding could be useful for these types of plants, but an accurate matching of cambia is required for this method.Both T and patch budding are performed when the rootstocks bark is slipping during spring. If bud take is unsuccessful, rootstocks are rebudded in September. For successful budding a sharp knife should be used to make smooth cuts. Budding wraps can be made of various materials, but plastic is the most common and widely used.Tree densities in carob orchards of Mediterranean countries have traditionally been low and variable, within the range of 25-45 trees/ha which means square tree spacing from 20 x 20 m to 15 x 15 m. Rectangular planting has also been a common design. Intercropping with species like olive, grapevines or almond is frequently found. Most of the areas where carob trees will grow are semi-arid or marginal for good horticultural production. In modern orchards there is a tendency to reduce spacing with the aim of intensifying the crop. Carobs are long-lived trees and a well-designed orchard should ensure early economic bearing, maximum production potential, adequate pollination and sufficient space for management (Fig. 12c).A carob orchard reaches its maximum bearing potential when space over the soil is filled by pod-bearing trees with sufficient light penetration to keep fruiting wood productive. As the orchard develops, and before maximum bearing potential is reached, bean yield is directly related to the number of trees per hectare. Currently, for dryland orchards on poor soils of the Mediterranean coast, tree densities between 100 and 175 trees/ ha are recommended, i.e. spacings from 9 x 9 m to 7 x 8 m (Tous and Batlle 1990).When carobs are to be planted in fertile soils, high-density planting and tree thinning later may be considered. Early yield can be maximized by initially planting more trees per hectare than will be needed for maximum bearing potential. As trees grow,half of them may be removed, but at considerable expense, to avoid tree crowding. Crowding results in yield losses from tree competition for light, nutrients and water, excessive pruning costs, and difficulty in conducting cultural and harvest operations. The closer the plantings, the more likely thinning will be required. In California, Coit (1951) suggested a spacing of 9 x 4.5 m and tree removal some 10 years after planting to obtain a spacing of 9 x 9 m. In good soils of the Algarve, Portugal, an initial density of 6 x 4 m and later thinning to a density of 6 x 8 m was proposed (Brito de Carvalho 1985). When the filler trees should be removed depends on tree growth. However, most new orchards are being planted at permanent tree density as tree removal is often not convenient for growers.Another alternative in young carob orchards is intercropping with early bearing species such as peach, almond or even vegetables. Planting an annual or perennial crop between the rows may give early returns to the investment. Care should be taken to choose pesticides compatible with the nonbearing carobs. In most cases intercropping may a damage carob orchard and cause problems for the grower.As described earlier, carob trees are generally dioecious with occasional hermaphrodite types. Thus female, male and hermaphrodite flowers are borne on separate trees. The need for pollination and fertilization in carob has been clearly shown by Russo (1954). This also may be deduced from the fact that all pods contain seeds, assuming that seeds are not formed apomictically, and that where a seed is missing the pod does not grow to its full width (Orphanos and Papaconstantinou 1969).The arrangement of pollinating trees in carob orchards has been traditionally disregarded by growers. This may have caused low yield or even have contributed to the abandonment of the crop. In the island of Crete, Sfakiotakis (1978) reported crop failure due to unfruitfulness resulting from lack of pollination. In Morocco, there is a project underway to graft male trees to increase pod production (S. Padulosi, pers. comm.). Pollination has traditionally been achieved either by keeping a male branch from the rootstock in the centre of the tree, if the rootstock is male, or by budding a male or hermaphrodite into the tree if the rootstock is female.Spontaneous trees (around 50% males) may be found in the neighbourhood, near paths or tracks, but generally in insufficient number. If male or hermaphrodite trees are planted as pollinators they must be interspersed around and within the orchard in a regular pattern. It is important to use different types of male or hermaphrodite pollinators to overlap with female cultivars' bloom, as main cultivars often display a long blooming season (3-4 months between August and November). Since male trees have a shorter flowering period than hermaphrodites, the latter usually show better overlapping.Neither the optimum density of pollinators in the orchard nor the possible differences between using males or hermaphrodites have been determined. The ideal ratio of male or hermaphrodite to female trees presumably depends on insect and wind activity in the orchard during flowering and also on pollen germinability. The proposed range varies from the 4% of Coit (1949) to the 20% of Merwin (1981). However, it seems enough to plant around 12% of pollinating trees (males or hermaphrodites) (Tous and Batlle 1990), e.g. a ratio of 8 females to 1 male or hermaphrodite, with pollinators planted in every 3rd row and separated by two female trees within the row. Additional staminate trees could also be planted in border rows upwind of the orchard. In California, Thomson (1971) recommended an orchard pollination design of hermaphrodites on alternate or every third row of trees for adequate pollination. In existing groves showing pollination deficiencies, some female trees can be top-worked and grafted with male or hermaphrodite scion wood.The carob tree is a species that needs little pruning, unlike other fruit and nut trees, which require pruning annually. After the basic framework of the tree has been established only light pruning is necessary. This fact is due to carob's specific growth and fruiting habits. While pruning, it is necessary to consider several important characteristics of carob (Tous and Batlle 1990):• its natural tendency to form a central axis with a strong prevalence of side shoots • fruiting on wood 2 years and older • sensitivity to big cuts, which heal very slowly.The traditional training methods were based on usually spherical or open vase forms, with a tall trunk and branching (first scaffold) from 1.5 m above the ground. Currently pruning is simple and straightforward. Short trunks (low first scaffold) favour a short vegetative (unbearing) period whereas longer trunks are advisable for mechanical harvesting using shakers. Thus the carob should be trained according to the harvesting system (manual or mechanical) foreseen, as free vase or modified central axis forms, respectively.This respects the natural shape of the young tree, pruning being very light or none at all during the first years. It is only necessary to eliminate the shoots that come out from around the soil and to break some of them to avoid excessive growth on the lower branches. After fruiting, the first shaping pruning should be done. This consists of removing the lowest branches over 2 years to produce a clean trunk of 0.5-0.7 m. With this training system small trees will develop less in height and more in width, easing manual harvesting using poles.It consists of leaving four or five primary branches well spaced and distributed along the axis of the trunk. The first can be located at a height of approximately 0.9-1 m. During the first years some lower branches can have their tips clipped in the summer, instead of being cut off totally. This training system gives a more upright crown and is more suitable for mechanical harvesting. It is important to stake the young trees to provide support for a number of years.They are usually slightly pruned and this operation should be carried out only occasionally after harvesting. Mature female, male and hermaphrodite carob trees produce flowers on wood of all ages and require light pruning only every 3-4 years to remove dead wood and encourage fruit-bearing wood by letting sunlight filter into the top middle section of the tree. This operation should be carried out particularly in years where a significant crop is expected. It is necessary to maintain an equilibrium between vegetative growth and production and it is particularly important to confine growth and production to the space allotted in the orchard.For fruiting, the best time to carry out pruning is at the beginning of autumn immediately after collecting the crop. Branches should be removed when they are not too thick (5-7 cm diameter) and the length of the annual shoot is less than 25-30 cm. Dead branches must also be removed as well as those which are crossed or excessively upright growing.Old neglected orchards or abandoned trees can be rejuvenated by thinning to increase and regularize production. If branches are broken in gales they should be removed with a clean cut and mastic applied to the cut surface to keep out rain as rotting can start easily, especially in mature trees at the peak of production.Traditionally, carob orchards have hardly been fertilized. This species has always been considered extremely adaptable to very poor soils and only some manure, when locally available, has been applied. However, in recent years, the revaluation of the crop has led some farmers to apply various types of fertilizer, either mineral or organic.Most bibliographic references highlight the benefits of nitrogen in increasing fruit production in old carob tree plantations (Lloveras and Tous 1992;Correia and Martins-Louçâo 1993). It has been shown that this leguminous tree is unable to fix atmospheric nitrogen (Martins-Louçâo and Rodríguez-Barrueco 1982;Martins-Louçâo 1985).In traditional orchards (density of 50 trees/ha) with average production of 2500-3000 kg/ha, an application of 50 kg of N, 20 kg of P 2 O 5 and 50 kg of K 2 O per hectare can be advisable (Tous and Batlle 1990). It is recommended to apply phosphorus/ potassium-based fertilizer and 25% of nitrogen in autumn after harvesting. The remaining nitrogen fertilizer can be applied in February as ammonium sulphate. In plantations receiving some irrigation, one can apply N and K in the months of May and June which coincides with the stage of fast growth of the fruit. It is important to stress the benefit of applying organic matter as with all other fruit and nut trees. It is recommended to apply 30-40 kg of manure per tree, every 3-4 years during autumn tilling.Work on carob fertigation by Correia and Martins-Louçâo (1995) in Algarve, Portugal, using mature trees of 'Mulata' and testing three levels of irrigation (0, 50 and 100%) based in water loss by evaporation, and two N amounts, as ammonium nitrate (21 and 63 kg ha-1 year-1) per each level has shown that predawn water potentials were always higher than -1.1 MPa. Midday leaf water potential values presented large seasonal variations and low values independently of treatments. The low leaf water potentials observed for fertigated trees during summer suggested that this parameter may be related not only to the evaporative demand but also to growth investment. The amount of fertigation was positively correlated with vegetative growth increment and fruit production. These results also suggested that under standard conditions in the Mediterranean region, N applications are effective even without irrigation. In addition, the results obtained are in agreement with the 'water spending' strategy proposed by Lo Gullo and Salleo (1988) for the carob tree as a drought adaptation mechanism.In the Mediterranean region, where water resources are scarce, irrigation is reserved for the more profitable horticultural crops. Therefore, the carob tree is planted in dry land. However, the availability of water is a requirement for good production. In this drought-resistant species the supply of water should be considered as occasional irrigation and within certain limits of dose and time of the year. Esbenshade and Wilson (1986) and Tous and Batlle (1990) observed a positive effect of irrigation on fruit production. Some experiments on young trees also resulted in a positive effect of irrigation on pod production (Esbenshade and Wilson 1986).Some authors indicate that, to ensure a good harvest, approximately 500 mm of rainfall per year are required (NAS 1979), but when rainfall is below 400 mm some complementary water supply is required (Tous and Batlle 1990). The main periods of irrigation in this species are considered to be spring, the beginning of summer (probable floral induction and fast pod growth) and autumn (flowering and accumulation of reserves).In carob orchards without irrigation (nearly all) it is worthwhile to apply some water with a tractor and tank in late spring and summer in the first 2 years after planting. This watering helps the start of tree growth and cropping. In those areas with scarce water supply, drip irrigation shows goods results. In adult orchards with water doses of 100 mm per year, benefits are clearly reflected in the yield (Tous and Batlle 1990).Soil maintenance in carob orchards has traditionally been carried out by tilling weeds to reduce evapotranspiration and improve water penetration. It is advisable to till the soil only to 15-20 cm depth, to prevent disrupting the shallow and active root system as this soil zone is generally the more fertile and better aired. Shallow tillage using a harrow or a cultivator is effective. Farmers in Spain usually till three times during the year, the first time in autumn before the rainy season starts, the second in spring and the third when the pods starts to ripen in early summer.In some orchards in Spain weed control is accomplished through the mixed system of tillage and herbicide applications with good results (Tous and Batlle 1990). The most commonly used chemicals have been simazine (pre-emergent, residual), paraquat, ammonium glyphosinate and glyphosate (post-emergent). It is advisable to avoid the application of residual herbicides before the 4th or 5th year. Weed control is especially important in young plantations, since heavy weed competition for water and nutrients can significantly reduce tree vigour and productivity.The carob tree is normally free from severe insect and disease troubles and is a crop which traditionally has not been sprayed. In Spain, the most damaging insect is the polyphagous larva of the leopard moth (Zeuzera pyrina L.) which attacks the wood of trunk and branches, causing severe damage to young trees. Cultivars tested in Spain were all susceptible to various degrees (Martorell 1987;Tous and Batlle 1990).In isolated cases, it can be controlled by introducing a wire into the galleries to destroy the larvae or by filling the holes with pesticide paste.The pods of many cultivars sometimes become infested with the small and polyphagous larva of the carob moth (Myelois ceratoniae Z.) while maturing and before harvest is complete. It also attacks stored carobs extensively where it can be controlled by fumigating. Coit (1961Coit ( , 1967) ) reported different susceptibility of several cultivars to the carob moth in California. Black aphids attack mainly the terminal shoots of young trees, and some hermaphrodite cultivars appear to show more susceptibility than females (Tous et al. 1996). In Cyprus, Orphanos (1980) reported carob midge (Asphondylia spp.) attacks on pods at a very early stage, which caused stunting. High humidity seems to soften the pods, making entry by worms much easier.The mildew disease caused by Oidium ceratoniae C. attacks pods, leaves and twigs in different periods of the year, mainly in spring and in autumn. Severe damage occurs only in some cultivars. For example, 'Rojal', 'Matalafera', 'Amele di Bari' and 'Racemosa', are fairly resistant to this disease while 'Negra', 'Melera', 'Costella', 'Santa Fe' and 'AA-2' are susceptible (Goor et al. 1958;Graniti 1959;Martorell 1987;Tous and Batlle 1990). Thus a cultivar grading to Oidium susceptibility exists. Another fungus, Polyporus sulphureus, can destroy branches in old trees. Young carob trees growing under greenhouse conditions have shown resistance to root rot caused by Armillaria (A. mellea and A. obscura) infection (Loreto et al. 1993).Other pests that occasionally cause severe damage to carob orchards are small rodents like gophers (Pitymys spp.) and rats (Rattus spp.). Gophers can severely damage the root system of young trees. In California, Thomson (1977) reported that it was almost impossible to establish a young orchard unless gophers are controlled. In Cyprus (Orphanos 1980) and other Mediterranean countries, rats are major pests. Rats can strip the bark not only of young shoots but also of older shoots and even limbs and by girdling a limb or branch can kill it. Several types of baits in traps can be used to control these rodents. However, the best control is natural predation by the wild native fauna, conservation of which is essential. Cattle, horses, sheep and goats all browse on the foliage of young and adult trees and can kill young unprotected trees.12.9 Yield Carob orchards are known to enter slowly into production. This has two main causes: the slow growth of the tree and its long vegetative period, and other environmental and cultural factors. In plantations located in marginal areas, the nonbearing period is long, from 6 to 8 years, while in others, where the conditions are better, cropping starts 3 or 4 years after budding. The production increases to achieve full bearing at 20-25 years of age and then stabilizes (Batlle 1985). Goor et al. (1958) reported that carob trees start to bear fruit in the 5th to 6th year when budded trees are planted and in the 7th or 8th year when seedlings are used for planting and later budded.It is also important to recognize that carob shows alternate or biennual bearing.The causes, in addition to genetics include climatic conditions such as scarce and variable rainfall, frost, fog, lack of pollination, damage of the inflorescence during harvesting (knocking down of the fruit), and deficiencies in orchard management (fertilization, pruning, etc.). Haselberg (1996) in Algarve, Portugal, has observed in 30 to 40-year-old 'Mulata' trees that the presence of pods in 'on' years has an inhibitory effect on the current season's flower differentiation, mainly during the period of most intensive fruit and seed growth (April to June).The productive potential of the carob is variable and scarcely known under good cultivation conditions. In Spain, average orchard productivity is around 1500 kg/ha (MAPA 1994), which can be regarded as very low. In Portugal, the average yield is 1700-2700 kg/ha (Droste 1993). In Tarragona, Spain, orchards which receive minimum management tend to produce 2000-3000 kg/ha, giving an average yield of 50-70 kg per tree. Some modern orchards 10 years old in Spain and Portugal give high yields, about 5000 kg/ ha in dry conditions and 7000 kg/ha with deficit irrigation (Tous et al. 1993). In Israel, on fully bearing trees in nonirrigated groves but with 550 mm of annual rainfall the yield can be about 7400 kg/ha and in irrigated orchards an average of 12 300 kg/ha can be reached (Goor et al. 1958). A well-grown adult tree could yield about 100-200 kg/year. Some big isolated trees can produce 250-300 kg in exceptional years.Carob harvesting is usually carried out at the end of summer or the beginning of autumn depending on cultivar and region. Harvesting can be manual or mechanical. In Mediterranean countries, carob groves are mainly hand-harvested by knocking down the pods with the help of long bamboo poles or wooden sticks and collecting them on fibre nets which are laid out under the trees. This operation needs careful handling since at this time of the year the carobs are in full bloom. The striking action of the poles can damage flowers and the next crop might be partially destroyed. This task constitutes the most significant part of the total cost of cultivation since it requires much hand labour, being currently about 30-35% of the total production costs (Orphanos 1980;Tous 1995b). In Spanish orchards the quantity of pods manually harvested, in average crop years, varies between 250 and 280 kg/day per worker (Tous and Batlle 1990). Mechanical harvesting using trunk or branch shakers has not been practised in most producing countries, mainly because of the small size of most orchards. However it seems feasible to adapt conventional harvesters used for other tree crops (olive, almond, pistachio, walnut, etc.) as carob branches are thick and stiff. To reduce harvesting cost, pods of a given cultivar should all be harvested at one time.Fruit ripeness, and therefore its optimal harvesting time, is indicated by the complete darkening of the pedicel just prior to natural detachment from the branch. This is a reliable sign that pods are ripe and have reached their full sugar content. Sometimes pod drop is hastened by the wind. Carobs should be harvested when they have 12-18% water content. After harvesting, carobs are either delivered to the processor or stored under shelter. Moisture will gradually decrease during the subsequent months of storage.Most of the carob pods harvested are brought to the processing plant. When carobs arrive, moisture content is variable (10-20%) depending on harvesting conditions and autumn rainfall. Pods require further drying and thus are stored under shelter in dry and ventilated places to reduce moisture to around 8% and to avoid rotting. Insects in stored carobs, mainly carob moth, can be controlled by fumigation. Pods are kibbled to separate the two main components: pulp and seeds.Carob pods are crushed mechanically using a kibbler, then are separated from the kernels. The processing of the carob beans and the products obtained are shown in Figure 13. This first coarse grinding can be followed by fine grinding of the pod pieces (kibbles) either at the same plant or at the feed or food factories. The feed factory grinds the deseeded pulp to different sizes in relation to the kind of livestock to be fed. The food industry processes the pulp further by roasting and milling to obtain a fine powder which is traded as carob powder.The carob seeds are transported in bulk by lorry to the gum factories. The kernels are difficult to process, since the seed coat is very hard. Kernels are peeled without damaging the endosperm and the embryos (germs). The two main procedures applied to remove seed coat are: acid (seeds treated with sulphuric acid to carbonize the coat) or roasting (kernels roasted in a rotating furnace to peel off the coat) (Puhan and Wielinga 1996). After the peeling process the endosperm can be split from the cotyledons because of their different friabilities. When the peeled seeds are forced through a splitting machine the brittle embryos turn out as a fine powder (germ meal) and can be separated from the unbroken endosperm scales by a sifting operation. Subsequently the endosperm is ground on roller mills to the desired particle size (gum). The carob bean gum is the ground endosperm and the carob germ meal is a by-product of the seed processing. Grower payout is calculated more and more in relation to the kernel yield of the cultivar delivered and also on amount of debris. Before carobs are stored, a grading sample is drawn from each delivery. This sample is processed individually using a small kibbler to determine kernel percentage. The two major components in determining return to the grower are weight delivered and percentage by weight of kernels.There are factors limiting the planting of carob in new areas, especially insufficient cold-hardiness, and factors limiting the profitability of the crop in existing areas, in particular factors that determine the suitability for modern orchards. In addition external economic factors limit the crop.Carob's main limitation is insufficient cold-hardiness. A frost of -4°C or below may damage or kill young trees or even shoots, flowers and young fruits in mature trees (Tous and Batlle 1990). A more severe frost can kill adult trees as has occurred several times in the Mediterranean region (in 1956 and 1985). Generally, carobs should not be planted above 500 m of altitude or in places where risk of frost is high. Acclimatization to low temperatures requires days to weeks for maximum chilling stress tolerance to develop. Photoperiod also seems to be involved in the acclimatization process in carob as in many other evergreen species.The main aim of new carob orchards should be to maximize seed production per hectare. Ideally cultivars should combine high seed yield and high productivity. However, useful cultivar information is only partially available. As the main labour requirement in carob groves is harvesting, efforts should be addressed to reduce this input which represents 30-35% of the total management cost (Orphanos 1980;Tous 1995b) and thus cultivars that ripen uniformly and are easy to shake should be used for mechanical harvesting.From the market situation over the past 15 years it can be seen that carob pod prices tend to be cyclic with long gaps, and high peaks as in the years 1984 (US$0.25/kg) and 1994 (US$0.80/kg). This makes the market unsettled and produces a negative effect on demand. In addition, highly variable prices favour market speculation. However, the industry needs a steady and regular raw supply and stable prices on which customers can rely. In addition, carob seed prices are even more fluctuating than carob kibble prices. As the main industrial application is the CBG this recurrent situation affects carob demand and thus its multiple uses. Big fluctuations in carob seed prices should be avoided in the future.Since the start of the 1980s this crop has raised a considerable interest because of generally sustained demand and increasing prices of the carob pods (pulp and seed). However, this trend has been sharply modified twice in the last 10 years: in 1984-85 and 1994-95 when prices peaked. The high pod prices led to a loss of competitiveness of the carob bean gum versus other natural (guar and tara) or artificial hydrocolloid substitutes, both times producing a subsequent decline of pod prices.Carob price stabilization in the market would improve the future outlook of this crop. The revaluation of the carob pulp in animal feeding and carob powder as human food, could help to increase its demand and then to reduce the final dependency of the pod price on the kernel. In addition the 'healthy' and 'light' component of derivatives of the carob pulp (confectionery, bakery and drinks) should be fully explored.The carob tree shows some outstanding features like rusticity, drought resistance, reduced orchard management, etc. and it is also well suited to part-time farming. In addition, modern carob orchards start bearing earlier (4th year after budding) than traditional ones and increase their yield steadily in response to minimum cultural care and lack of irrigation. The development of a useful method of propagation by cuttings would have a favourable impact on carob growing.Agricultural sustainability has been increasing in importance over the years. Although carobs produce reduced yields in old plantations (1500-3000 kg/ha), in modern orchards production potential is higher (5000-7000 kg/ha). In addition, in optimum conditions carob requires a minimum of inputs compared with most other fruit, nut or vegetable crops. In many semi-arid regions and marginal soils where carob is well adapted and cultivated, the quantity and quality of irrigation water are major limitations to production. This crop has received little attention until now but is currently being re-emphasized as an alternative in dryland areas with subtropical Mediterranean climates for diversification of coastal agriculture.Although it seems that the overall world carob production trend is rather stationary (Tous and Ferguson 1996;Batlle 1997) some countries will continue to reduce their production while a few will probably increase theirs. Production in Morocco is likely to increase in the coming years to supply its local industry for gum extraction which benefits from low labour costs. Australia also seems to be a future potential producer of pods, mainly for livestock feeding in agroforestry systems (Esbenshade and Wilson 1986;Tous 1995a;Race and Curtis 1996).Another factor to be considered is that the total harvested carob production is partially affected by the price level. It was assessed in commercial groves in Sicily, Italy by Licitra (1996) that 10-15% of the whole production is only collected when pod prices are rewarding for growers and even more than 50% on spontaneous isolated trees. The main production is usually harvested every year. This is also happening in some other Mediterranean growing areas.The reviewed information on genetic resources shows that carob cultivars vary widely in many characteristics, such as yield, season of maturity, susceptibility to pests, precocity, ease of harvest, sugar content, kernel yield, gum content and quality.Most CBG factories are placed in Mediterranean countries of the European Union (EU) (Spain, 5; Portugal, 2; Italy, 1) as this is the leading world carobproducing region and is expected to remain so in the future. However, newly established industries are operating in developing African countries like Morocco (which has 2). There is also a small processing plant in Turkey. The current CBG world demand by the food and pet food industries of around 15 000 t should be supplied yearly; otherwise, the consumer industry will change to other gums with a consequent loss of market. Although supply and demand of CBG show some flexibility annually (around 2750 t), any market loss is usually hard to recover.One strength in the carob sector is that it is fairly well organized in the main producing countries. Thus although growers, cooperatives, kibblers, factory managers, the agrofood industry and R & D institutions have some different interests, all rely on proper prices for pods and kernels and are aware that a betterorganized sector (from producer to consumer) would be mutually beneficial. Most of the companies that produce carob bean gum have belonged since 1972 to the Institut Europeen des Industries de la Gomme de Caroube (INEC) which is located in Brussels, Belgium. INEC has a Technical Committee and a Secretariat General which is based at ETH in Zürich, Switzerland.INEC was launched by most of the important producers of CBG as a cooperative nonprofit organization to meet the extensive toxicological investigations requested by the FAO/WHO and the EU on food additives to be considered harmless. The INEC could play an important role in supporting studies on production and application of the CBG as the natural gum with best properties for the food and pharmaceutical industries. In addition, the INEC could foster programmes to conserve the carob crop and develop crop technology, encourage new plantings in developing regions, and improve the use and economics of carob kernels.At present, it is mainly growers of Spain, Portugal, Greece and Italy who seem to be interested in carob as a crop. Most remaining Mediterranean countries maintain carob as a native tree, useful environmentally and for landscape recreation. Currently, this tree crop is included in the EU aid programme. Actions are considered in the Nut and Carob Production Organizations scheme (European Regulation number 2159/89). In addition, the carob tree was included in forestry actions of the EU (European Regulation number 2080/92).A decision to establish, expand or replant a carob orchard requires knowledge of current and potential consumption (domestic and abroad) and price evolution (variability and projection). It is also important to know competition and market volatility. Its future possibilities in an ever-more competitive horticulture with increasingly low inputs (labour, water, fertilizers, sprays, etc,) are promising provided that the CBG market prices stabilize. Production costs can be reduced by increasing the ease of harvest. In addition, its use as an ornamental species for xerogardening and for landscaping is increasingly being recognized.An interesting initiative to promote carob growing was the establishment of the Associaçao Interprofissional para o Desenvolvimento da Produçao e Valorizaçao da Alfarrova (AIDA) in 1985 in the Algarve, Portugal. This independent association brings together efforts of interested people and institutions involved in carob production, processing and marketing.Carob has been traditionally neglected by Research & Development programmes so that knowledge about existing cultivars in the Mediterranean region is still poor. Centuries of carob cultivation have given rise to a number of cultivars differing in agronomic characters, and large natural populations remain untouched in countries like Morocco and Turkey as described in the Genetic Resources section. Thus surveys and a cooperative project to compare and characterize most useful cultivars and types selected from the wild are much needed.In 1973, the Mediterranean Group for Applied Plant Physiology (MPP) chose the carob tree as a suitable Mediterranean species meriting R & D effort to improve the knowledge of its physiology and environmental adaptation. Since this initiative, three International Carob Symposia have been held with the participation of physiologists, pomologists, chemists, pharmacists and processing managers. As the main group involves physiologists, the main output has been on physiologyrelated subjects.These three Symposia were held in 1978 in Aldeia das Açoteias, Portugal (Catarino 1980), in 1987in Valencia, Spain (Fito and Mulet 1988), and in 1996 in Cabanas, Portugal. It is clear that the knowledge on genetic resources, propagation, agronomy, potential productivity, agroforestry, afforestation and uses of carobs is still too limited compared with other Mediterranean tree species. In 1986, a meeting was held in INIA Oeiras, Portugal on carob research activities in which the main working lines of several research groups from some producing countries were discussed (Brito de Carvalho 1988b).Work on characterization and documentation of carob cultivars is scarce worldwide (Grainger and Winer 1980). In addition to some classic work by Russo (1954) in Italy, Coit (1967) in California, Orphanos and Papaconstantinou (1969) in Cyprus and Vardar et al. (1980) in Turkey, some countries like Italy, Portugal and Spain have recently made surveys on their native genetic resources and collected material to be studied and conserved in collections and genebanks (Tous et al. 1996). The carob research programme at IRTA-Mas Bové was started in 1984 (Batlle and Tous 1988), after a wide survey of the carob native genetic resources and possibilities of this crop in Catalonia had been carried out by Batlle (1985).Although several descriptors outlines have been proposed for carob (Coit 1949;Russo 1954;Donno and Panaro 1965;Batlle 1985;Brito de Carvalho 1988a;Crescimanno et al. 1988;Tous et al. 1996) the development of a generally accepted scheme for cultivar characterization and evaluation, ideally with the support of IPGRI, is much needed. It would be possible for IRTA to take this initiative. A good starting framework for a descriptor list would be the last scheme proposed by Tous et al. (1996) which is presented with some modifications in Appendix III. Passport, management, and environmental and site descriptors are omitted.In the existing carob collections it seems that enough genetic diversity exists for crop improvement. However, as the main use for carob pods is currently the seeds, whereas most cultivars maintained in collections were selected for high pulp content, it is worth selecting and collecting more wild types with high seed yield and characterizing/evaluating them in orchards. A survey of isoenzymes or other molecular markers in appropiate populations will allow the level and distribution of genetic diversity within and between the two Ceratonia species to be estimated. This is of potential interest if the two species hybridize. It could be interesting to compare diversity of cultivars with diversity in the wild. It could also help to locate species polymorphism for collecting and conservation. A marker for sex also would be useful if carob breeding is attempted.Although progress has been made on carob propagation by cuttings (Alorda et al. 1987;Alorda and Medrano 1988;Cabrita et al. 1988;De Michelle and Occorso 1988), efforts are needed to transfer this technique to the nursery industry. A simple and cheap method for producing trees by cuttings would make budding unnecessary and might provide a shorter vegetative period.Pollination in carob either by insect or wind is not yet clearly understood. It is a key component of orchard design and production and consequently should be studied further. A wide range of flowering types (male and hermaphrodite) should be included in any work to be carried out. Pollen germination tests (in vivo and in vitro) are necessary to select and propagate male and hermaphrodite pollinators. In addition, flower induction is a critical step for fruit production and thus for orchard management but is poorly understood and needs to be studied in the near future.More information is also needed on tree density and potential yield. The precise nutrition and water requirements of the carob are yet to be determined. In addition, more research work on carob cambial activity and potential differences between cultivars and sites, under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions, is needed to schedule water supply and stop growth before winter.Alternate or biannual bearing causes problems for both farmers and the stock market. CBG factory managers need to know every year the potential carob pod production to plan their purchases. Thus developing techniques for early assessment of the anticipated production is of particular interest to CBG factory operators. So the companies which belong to INEC might be interested in collaborating on projects to forecast carob yield (e.g. from pollen fluxes, meteorological data, etc.) in the future.The use of carob for afforestation and soil conservation in warm Mediterranean areas with degraded vegetation or to prevent erosion is often raised but has not yet been investigated. It seems that carob is not a forest species as it thrives in the maquis; however, its role and potential suitability to cover bare land will be worth assessing. In addition, its response to fire, which is common in the Mediterranean region, is unknown. Sprouting ability would be a determining factor in natural regeneration. The carob tree showed some regeneration capacity after aerial killing by deep frost (-15°C) on the Mediterranean Spanish coast in 1956 and 1985 (Batlle 1985). As carob cannot withstand competition with other forest and maquis trees and shrubs, its germination in nature is rare. It thrives well and regenerates by seeds on dry and warm sites in Israel (Liphschitz 1987). The development of mycorrhiza inoculation in carob nurseries could improve the establishment and growth of new orchards and afforestation plantings.To short ( ), medium ( ), long ( ) Width (W) (cm) narrow ( ), medium ( ), wide ( ) Thickness (T) (cm) thin ( ), medium ( ), thick ( ) L/W, L/T, W/T relations Volume of 100 seed (cc) Seed weight (g, average 100 seeds) small (< 0.17), medium ( 0.17-0.2), high(>0.2) Gum content (% dry wt. low (< 48), medium (48-2), high (>52) of endosperm) 6 Agronomic Yield; regularity of production; precocity; sensitivity to frost, wind; pest and disease susceptibility; ripening season; ease of harvesting, etc.Uses of carob pods (animal feed or human food); tannin content; sugar, etc.; quality of CBG (viscosity and gel strength); germ content, etc. † Passport, management, and environmental and site descriptors are omitted. Source: modified from Tous et al. (1996)."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2591826153.json b/main/part_2/2591826153.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1284c54b78157a069887d937b117944ba6262f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2591826153.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d8f1ed2e01856dbb48ddac706e103a16","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/040e5664-a1ca-4839-abe4-e487ea2bd4f8/retrieve","id":"1764707487"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6f3ace57-87f3-4a2d-a7d8-be937b476ed5","content":"Notes from State Minister of the Ministry of Agriculture, Ethiopia Fikru Regassa Ethiopia has large cattle population, but milk production is low to fulfil the existing demand for milk and milk products. Efforts to increase milk production and productivity are mainly linked with improvement in the genetics, feed, animal health and husbandry practices. Failure to increase improved genetics is one of the major constraints that is seriously affecting production; the number of crossbred cattle is about 2.34% of the total cattle population. The Ethiopian government and development partners have been supporting smallholder farmers and private sector to transform the dairy sector from subsistence to market-oriented dairy. Progress registered so far is promising but is far behind expectation.So far, the genetic improvement mainly focused on artificial insemination of indigenous breeds with exotic dairy sires. For the last four decades, the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) has been providing artificial insemination services by producing and distributing semen from elite bulls, training technicians and producing liquid nitrogen for semen preservation. However, there was no systematic evaluation of progenies of bulls distributed; the genetic makeup of the crossbred cows is in the hands of the farmers. Thus, the genetic progress after many years of crossbreeding still remains a question that has to be answered by researchers.The initiatives taken by MoA, National Animal Genetic Improvement Institute (NAGII), Natural Resource Institute Finland and International Livestock Research Institute's African Dairy Genetic Gain project to establish and pilot a national dairy animals identification and registration system, establish a national database with all facilities and capture digital data from smallhold-er farmers are basic interventions to improve the dairy sector. In addition, hair samples were collected for genomic analysis to identify the genetic makeup of the crossbred animals managed by farmers and multiplication centres. The capacity to collect hair samples for genomic analysis to identify the genetic makeup of heifers and cows and the genomic data with phenotypic data will speed up genetic improvement in the country. Now, we have reached a level to see the fruits of the efforts made so far in this regard. Phenotypic and genomic data are analyzed, sires/cows are ranked based on their estimat-ed breeding values and top-ranking animals identified and documented in this catalogue. Feedback of the genetic analysis will be provided to owners of the selected bulls so that the farmers or the national genetic improvement program will use the bulls for future genetic improvement. Furthermore, the result will support farmers to make informed decisions either to retain or cull their animals and to value their best heifers and cows to sell at a ruminative price, or use their heifers or cows as collateral to get loans from banks for farm expansion and herd replacement.The ministry would like to commend NAGII, LUKE and ILRI for the transformative work done so far. However, sustaining the ongoing effort requires a concerted effort of all actors in the dairy value chain, private sector and development partners. This catalogue is the first of its kind in our country. As we scale up and out the ongoing genetic improvement, such catalogues will be annually published and communicated to dairy cattle actors. It will also be complemented with parades of the best bulls, cows and heifers. The MoA will continue working to realize the objectives of this initiative by scaling up to reach as many smallholder dairy farmers as possible.Notes from the Director General of ILRIThe International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) is a CGIAR research centre, a global research partnership for a food-secure future. ILRI works to improve food and nutrition security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for efficient, safe and sustainable use of livestock. Through its work, ILRI seeks to solve constraints that hinder the growth of livestock production and productivity. ILRI is co-hosted by Kenya and Ethiopia, and has 14 offices across Asia and Africa. ILRI undertakes its research in close collaboration with hundreds of partners, including national and regional research institutes, civil society organizations, academia, development organizations and the private sector.Livestock are critical to rural incomes, nutrition and food security, and resilience in smallholder mixed crop-livestock and pastoral systems in much of Africa. In most African countries, 60-80% of rural households keep livestock. Organic fertilizer (manure) and animal traction make indirect and critical contributions to crop production. Rapid growth in demand for food of animal origin in Africa, stimulated by high population growth and gains in real per capita income and urbanization, represents a major opportunity to achieve poverty reduction and economic growth, and for making an overall contribution to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. However, livestock production is constrained by lack of animal feed in adequate amount and quality, limited high producing adaptable genetics, prevalence of animal diseases and climate change.In Ethiopia, ILRI works with national organizations to achieve the aims of the government's Growth and Transformation Plan and the Ministry of Agriculture's Agricultural Growth Program. These national partners include federal ministries and research institutes, universities, regional state government offices and research institutes, NGOs, the private sector, local communities and their representatives, as well as development projects.African Dairy Genetic Gains (ADGG) is part of the portfolio in the livestock genetics program working with local and international partners to apply innovative solutions and advanced sciences and technologies to improve genetics. In Ethiopia, the ADGG program is contributing to human and infrastructure capacity development to enable long-term genetic improvement to improve the multiplication and delivery of tropically adapted improved genetics, develop electronic data capture, data analysis and feedback system and demonstrate use of ICT to capture field data and provide extension service, educate farmers, and provide feedback. This animal catalogue is a key output meant to showcase top-ranked bulls and cows that would be used in future genetic improvement to improve farmers animals.ILRI appreciates the financial support by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for funding the project and the support of the Ministry of Agriculture at national and regional levels, the farmers, and many other partners. ILRI would like to strengthen its partnerships to sustain the program and bring a bigger impact to the transformation of the dairy sector.Overview and achievements of African Dairy Genetic Gains (ADGG) Project Okeyo Mwai, ADGG Principal Investigator Background Milk production in developing countries, including Ethiopia, is dominated by smallholder dairy farmers, each keeping 1-3 dairy cows. The majority of these farmers are not currently extracting optimum benefits because herd and cow production and productivity levels remain low. Increasing milk production in these countries could be achieved through the following combined interventions: a) identification and promotion of dairy genetics that best matche the prevailing and predicted management conditions; b) improved husbandry, especially feeding, health care and housing; c) timely and customized farmer education and feedback; d) access to good quality inputs, including breeding services at affordable prices, and e) supportive policies that allow enabling institutional frameworks and markets to thrive.The African Dairy Genetic Gains (ADGG) program (https://africadgg.wordpress.com/category/adgg/) was initiated with a vision for African smallholder dairy farmers to continuously access more productive dairy genetics, breeding, farmer education services and other related input services enabling their farm enterprises to be profitable and competitive businesses. The program objectives are to a) establish performance recording and sampling systems in Tanzania and Ethiopia; b) use the information and samples to develop systems to select crossbred bulls and cows of superior genetic merit for artificial insemination (AI) and natural mating; c) pilot farmer feedback systems that assist farmers to improve their productivity; d) establish public-private, nongovernment organisations and producer partnerships necessary for funding and scaling the on-going ADGG program into a regional platform.The ADGG program supports Ethiopia's national dairy recording centre (https://portal.adgg.ilri.org/) to operate a digital data capture platform that has enabled more than 70,000 dairy herds and 110,000 animals to be registered and their pedigree and performance data recorded. Genomic information is captured on a sub-set of the animals and all records are appropriately analyzed to generate breeding values (https://portal.adgg.ilri.org/sites/default/files/ADGG_ETH_ BULLCOW_ sel_GUIDE_2020.pdf) that are used to rank animals. The very best males are selected to provide semen for Artificial Insemination (AI) through national and regional AI centres in Ethiopia. This way, the genetic variability among and within cattle breeds in Ethiopia are being efficiently exploited, while at the same time a population of resilient yet productive dairy genetics is slowly being built.Augmented by a national animal identification system, the results and information gathered over time are used to inform the design and implementation of a structured genetic improvement program at national and regional level. The above have been achieved through innovative applications of Information Communication Technology (ICT) and genomic technology.ADGG is a farmer and country-focused ILRI-led project funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that is being piloted in Ethiopia and Tanzania since 2016, and recently (in 2020) has expanded to Kenya with plans for Uganda and Rwanda underway. In Ethiopia, ADGG is jointly working with the National Animal Genetic Improvement Institute (NAGII) and other domestic and international partners.In each country, the project routinely captures herd performance records of individual animals, their production environment and genomic information. The data generated is used to identify appropriate dairy genetics, including crossbred bulls of superior genetic merit for increased milk production, fertility, longevity and resilience. The selected bulls are then made available to farmers in the form of semen or breeding bulls for AI or controlled natural mating. Results from performance evaluations and guidance on management practices to improve productivity are relayed back to the livestock producers through simplified SMS messages using the i-cow platform. Information received by farmers guides their adoption of improved cow management practices which will ultimately lead to sustained productivity gains, income, nutrition and poverty reduction.• ADGG is operating in 98 districts in Amhara, Oromia, SNNP, Sidama (former SNNP region) and Tigray regions, and Addis Ababa city administration.• Infrastructure has been provided to enable NAGII and regional livestock offices to effectively deliver the genetic improvement plan as follows:• High-capacity server (8 TB storage and 256 GB memory), server rack, Smart-UPS RT 20000 XL and air conditioning machine• 100 motorbikes, 92 tablets and 15 laptops• 25,000 printed plastic ear tags and 200 heart girth measurement tapes • Four milk analyzer machines• A national dairy cattle database with a robust animal identification and registration system has been developed and dairy production data generated through different projects availed in one portal.• A digital offline data capture system to collect animal performance data from the field has been established. The offline data capture system uses customized ADGG ODK Tools (https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/108942). A feedback system using direct SMS has also been developed and is being fine-tuned and adapted for Ethiopia. These products are supported by a robust and agile digital platform, the structure of which is summarized below:• Ethiopian dairy herds and animals registered by ADGG, PAID and LUKE projects have been harmonized into one national dairy cattle database. The total number of dairy herds, dairy cattle and test day milk records registered in the digital ADGG platform is more than 70,000, 110,000 and 195,000, respectively.• More than 6,000 animals have been genotyped using medium-density SNP chip, thus enabling artificial insemination bulls to be locally selected by NAGII using state-of-the-art genomic predictions.• A first round genomic prediction algorithms and systems for selecting crossbred bulls and cows of superior genetic merit for artificial insemination, natural mating and multiplication centres has been deployed.• Elite animals have been certified and promoted to artificial insemination centres, the top three locally adapted crossbred bulls were transferred to artificial insemination centres for wider national use.• Farmer feedback systems that assist farmers to improve their productivity have been successfully piloted.• Customized feedback messages have been developed and deployed based on performance data collectd from famers' herds.• SMS based feedback system (cow calendar) and dairy management support services reaching smallholder dairy farmers through digital extension commenced. A total of 8,897,549 education messages in the form of SMS have been provided to farmers by iCoW in collaboration with ADGG in the last four years.• Breed composition of crossbred cows owned by farmers was determined based on the genotype informatition and shared with farmers to improve herd management in line with the animal's requirement and production potential.• Human resource capacity building:• Capacity of the national system to collect field data, manage, analyze and provide feedback to smallholder farmers has been enhanced. project with an additional one year no-cost extension period. The project was designed to address genetic constraints to dairy productivity growth in Amhara, Oromia, SNNP (+ Sidama) and Tigray regions of Ethiopia by strengthening artificial insemination (AI) delivery through public-private partnerships. PAID is also aiming at establishing financially sustainable private channels, as well as more efficient and effective government channels for the delivery of AI and related dairy cattle development services, and stimulating significant private investment leading to the inclusive growth of East Africa's dairy sector.Venture37, together with the Ethiopian government and selected dairy genetics firms, works collaboratively to achieve PAID's major objectives of: 1) strengthening local capacity for doorstep delivery of reliable AI services; 2) supporting, incentivizing and monitoring the performance of 400 public and 100 private AI service providers who in turn provide training on improved whole dairy farm management to at least 140,500 smallholders and deliver approximately one million AI services and other dairy production inputs and services; and 3) enabling the National Animal Genetic Improvement Institute (NAGII) and Regional Artificial Insemination Centres (AICs) to ramp up their production and distribution of quality frozen semen produced from proven pure and crossbred bulls.Key achievements:• AI techs curriculum updated and 200 printed copies transferred to NAGII.• Farmers' training materials produced. Four manuals, eight video clips, 11 posters and six brochures in three languages (Amharic, Oromiffa and Tigrigna) have been produced and distributed to AI technicians.• Over 230,000 printed ear tags and 500 ear tag applicators distributed to AI technicians. In addition, five ear tag printers were transferred to NAGII and the four target regional AI centres.• Computer Assisted Semen Analyzer (CASA) transferred to NAGII.• Fourteen semen lab and eight LN2 production plant technicians from NAGII and regional AI centres trained.• First round media campaign on AI technology use conducted.• First round use of hormones for heat synchronization and AI carried out.Contributions of the government of Finland and the Natural Resources Institute (Luke) to Ethiopian dairy herd performance recording and national animal evaluation Enyew Negussie, senior scientistIn 2011 experts from NAGII, MoA and Luke recognized the missing gaps that an institute like NAGII needs to fill to be able to support dairy development in the whole country. It needs to have a system for national animal identification, dairy herd performance recording, selection of superior bulls and dams using modern genetic evaluation methodologies and a facility for data analysis. In addition, it needs to build a strong capacity in animal evaluation methodologies and design of dairy breeding programs.To address these challenges, a joint project between the Finnish and Ethiopian governments titled \"Capacity Building in Herd Performance Recording and Genetic Improvement to Strengthen the Ethiopian Dairy Development\" started in 2012. The project was financed by the Institutional Cooperation Instrument of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland with about 850,000 euros and a substantial Ethiopian contribution both financial and in-kind. The implementation of the project was coordinated by Luke Finland in close cooperation with MoA and NAGII. The main objectives of the project were to: 1) establish a national dairy herd performance recording and advisory system; 2) build a modern computerized database management facility at NAGII; 3) develop locally adapted dairy cattle breeding strategies; and 4) strengthen the human,institutional and organizational capacity of NAGII.The project in its Phase I (2012-2014) built the Ethiopian national animal identification system and established a national dairy herd performance monitoring scheme on a pilot scale, built a computerized national dairy cattle database centre and supported capacity building for experts and farmers in herd performance recording and advisory systems. A total of 152 herds were first entered into the national herd performance and farmers advisory system.In Phase II (2015-2017), the national herd performance recording and farmers advisory system, which was started in and around Addis Ababa with 152 herds, scaled up to Tigray and Amhara regions involving a total of 721 herds. It was in this phase that for the first time the national routine dairy genetic evaluation system started utilizing 115,000 test-day milk records from 400 herds and 17,000 animals in the pedigree. A national performance recording system without farmers feedback reporting system cannot be sustained and hence, an automated quarterly and annual farmers feedback reporting system was built simultaneously. The project also trained a total of 1,292 (156 women and 1,136 men) experts, technicians, extension agents, farmers and officials in various fields. The institutional capacity of NAGII and its infrastructures was strengthened with the provision of two small database server computers, several laptops, two Toyota-Hilux field vehicles, several motorcycles, milk compositional analysis equipment and a large supply of printed ear tags.Towards the end, the Luke-led project ADGG started. The two projects came together, harmonized the various activities and have been working collaboratively ever since to ensure a vital continuation that provided an invaluable foundation for the successful implementation and marked achievements of the ADGG project we are witnessing today. A critical component of any project is to ensure its continuity. In this regard, the capacity building work done by Luke at all levels is designed to ensure the continuation of project achievements. The Finnish government and Luke supported the training of two professionals to get their MSc and a PhD in dairy genetic improvement within the realm of this project to ensure continuity and strengthen the Ethiopian dairy development."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2592102367.json b/main/part_2/2592102367.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bff8fdb02211dc5732a7943f32ff170171d76ab2 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2592102367.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ef85393be5721bb8f0943433f97c1155","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/cbdfb1d9-6511-45e2-a09c-27b2bc630998/retrieve","id":"-953650679"},"keywords":["Banana Canopy cover Leaf area index Soil moisture deficit Irrigation Drone imagery C1, cycle 1","C2, cycle 2","CC, canopy cover","CC ini , initial canopy cover","CC max , maximum canopy cover","CC rel , relative CC","RF, rainfed","Dr, soil moisture depletion","ET 0 , daily reference evapotranspiration","FC, field capacity","FI, full irrigation","GN, grande naine","HG, huti green","LA, leaf area","laf, leaf area factor","LAI, leaf area index","MAP, months after planting","nls, non-linear least squares","p, depletion factor","P, leaf pruning event","PWP, permanent wilting point","r, canopy cover"],"sieverID":"391bd1d0-ec59-4052-a7fd-a741bfa77036","content":"The biggest abiotic threat to banana (Musa spp.) production is water deficit, but physiological indicators in plantations are lacking. Canopy Cover (CC) seems to be a relevant parameter, but so far not used in banana fields. Field experiments were conducted to determine the effect of optimal irrigation (FI) versus rainfed (RF) on CC and Leaf Area Indices (LAI) in two experiments with different cultivars (Mchare 'Huti Green' [HG, AA] and Cavendish 'Grand Naine'[GN, AAA]) (n = 3 for HG, n = 4 for GN) until harvest of cycle 1 (C1), studying C1 and C2 plants. Soil moisture was followed using Time Domain reflectometry. CC and LAI were reduced 8-9 weeks after the start of soil moisture divergence between RF and FI treatments in both experiments (p < 0.05), leading to a reduction in CC growth rate (r) and maximum CC (CC max ) in RF plots (p < 0.05). On a daily timescale, CC varied diurnally (i.e. was reduced) under high evaporative demands, whereby soil moisture depletion increased the CC reduction. Cultivar specific CC-LAI curves were created following the Lambert-Beer equation, whereby HG had a lower extinction coefficient than GN (0.52 vs. 0.67). CC growth over time seems a promising indicator for water deficit in the field. Diurnally, CC is more affected by evaporative demand than soil moisture depletion, although soil moisture depletion increases CC diurnal drops under high ET 0 .By 2050, global population levels are expected to reach 9.7 billion (+ 32 % from 2015), with over two thirds of this expansion happening in developing countries, and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) accounting for half the total growth (United Nations., 2019). To feed this growing population, food production needs to increase by 25-70 % (Hunter et al., 2017;FAO., 2018). One of the most important crops in terms of consumption, land area and production is banana (Musa spp.). Global production of banana and plantains was 153 million Mg in 2017 covering 5.6 million ha in over 135 countries. It is the 12 th most important food crop in terms of production (fourth in Africa) and the world's most important fruit (FAOSTAT, 2019).In East and Central Africa (ECA), daily per capita consumption is 15 times the global average, and constitutes a very significant portion of daily energy intake ranging from 30 to 60 % (Abele et al., 2007;FAOSTAT., 2019). Actual production in the area is low (< 30 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ) compared with attainable yields (> 70 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ) (Wairegi et al., 2010;Van Asten et al., 2011). Water is the primary limiting factor for agriculture in SSA, where only 18 % of the total irrigable land is currently irrigated (Adhikari et al., 2015). Water (both excess and deficit) is considered to be the largest limiting abiotic factor affecting banana production worldwide (Carr, 2009). Depending on the prevailing climate, water needs for banana range from 1100 to 2650 mm evenly distributed per year (Robinson and Alberts, 1986;Van Asten et al., 2011;Varma and Bebber, 2019). Even distribution is essential, as plants are already affected after two to three days of soil moisture deficit (Carr, 2009).By 2050, climate change in ECA is expected to increase the thermal suitable area for banana production by 1-11 %, but extension of land area under beneficial temperatures is expected to be offset by an increase in rainfall variability. Moreover, as temperature drives development rates of banana (Fortescue et al., 2011), the increase in temperature is coupled with faster crop cycles, an increase in evapotranspiration, thereby increasing transpiration rates and putting more pressure on water resources (Adhikari et al., 2015;Varma and Bebber, 2019).In view of the above, agriculture needs to be intensified by a more efficient use of both rainfall and irrigation water, and the enhancement of water use efficiency. In most cases, management of irrigation systems is based on farmers' intuition and experience, which is suboptimal (Boesveld et al., 2011), rather than allocating water when plants are in need. This is because easy physiological indicators for water deficit are lacking in banana, and most farmers find current irrigation scheduling tools overwhelming and lack the means and skills to install and operate them (Carr, 2009;Boesveld et al., 2011). Under relatively mild soil drought conditions, banana plants close their stomata, reduce transpiration and photosynthesis. This keeps leaves hydrated, most likely through root pressure, but masks that banana are under water deficit (Turner et al., 2007;Carr, 2009).Expanding tissues, as emerging leaves and growing fruit, are among the first to be affected (Kallarackal et al., 1990;Thomas and Turner, 1998;Carr, 2009;Robinson and Galán Saúco, 2010). At the field (plantation) level, canopy development can be measured by the leaf area index (LAI) or green canopy cover (CC). LAI is defined as the total one-sided leaf area of all leaves per unit ground area (m² m −2 ). LAI values in banana plantations range from zero at planting to five at maturity in well-managed plantations, even reaching values more than six in ratoon crops (Turner, 1998;Turner et al., 2007;Carr, 2009). It is measured directly or indirectly. When leaves and plant parameters are measured directly, the most accurate LAI is obtained, but given the spatial heterogeneity of the canopy, many sampling points are needed which is time consuming, tedious, and sometimes destructive (Weiss et al., 2004). Indirect measurements are based on the estimation of \"contact frequency\" or the \"gap fraction\" with various possible optical devices (LAI2000, TRAC, Demon and cameras for hemispherical photography). Contact frequency methods are based on the likelihood that a beam penetrating the canopy will reach a vegetative structure. Gap frequency methods are inverse, as the beam has no contact with the vegetative structure until reaching a reference level and consequently the gaps in the canopy are measured. These techniques therefore use light transmittance through the canopy. Indirect methods need to be calibrated to the specific architecture of banana plants, as they are based on canopy characteristics such as leaf angle distribution, leaf inclination function and planting density (Weiss et al., 2004). Hence, indirect LAI methods are difficult to use when not yet parameterized and given the widespread heterogeneity of banana plants in the field, parameterization of LAI measurements for one cultivar at a specific location might not be useful in other plantations or fields with another cultivar.A simpler indicator is the CC, defined as the proportion (%) of ground area covered by the vertical projection of the canopy (Jennings et al., 1999). In contrast to LAI, CC is easier to estimate given current drone technology. CC can easily and reliably be determined from image analysis. Unlike LAI, remote sensing and drone imagery allows a dynamic view of the CC averaged over much larger areas, as repeated images can be gathered at multiple times during the day of a complete plantation. This dynamic view of plantations is needed as individual banana plants unfold their lamina differently in response to variable environmental stimuli and soil conditions, typically following a diurnal rhythm with leaf halves forming a single plane aligned with the midrib during the night and early morning, and folding down to become more vertical during the day under periods of high radiation (Milburn et al., 1990;Thomas and Turner, 1998;Turner, 1998;Turner and Thomas, 1998;Turner et al., 2007). Lamina folding occurs in drought stressed plants (Milburn et al., 1990;Thomas and Turner, 1998;Turner and Thomas, 1998), but this is questioned (Lu et al., 2002). While the effect of drought on leaf emission and growth has been described (Turner and Thomas, 1998;Turner et al., 2007;Carr, 2009), the overall effect on CC, and therefore at the plantation level, is not known. Furthermore, the diurnal effect of leaf folding measured by CC cannot be reflected at the plantation scale by LAI as leaf sizes remain quite similar on a daily scale.Given the lack of knowledge on CC in banana plantations, the overall objective was to investigate to what extent plot-scale observations of CC provide insights into water deficit. We hypothesize that soil moisture readily affects CC development as emerging leaves are among the first organs to be affected by drought. In addition we hypothesize diurnal changes in CC which are correlated with changes in daily evaporative demand, and that these changes are larger in plants experiencing water deficits. Thirdly, we hypothesized that CC-LAI relationships can be obtained per cultivar, allowing to calculate CC values from LAI values.Experiments were conducted at the joint research farm of the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST) and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in Arusha, Tanzania (3°23′ 58″ S, 36°47′ 48″ E). Soils are Endocalcic Phaeozems (Geoabruptic, Clayic, Humic) (IUSS Working Group WRB., 2014) or Udertic to Vertic Haplustols (USDA., 1999) on gently sloping land (3%) located at the foothill of Mt. Meru at an altitude of 1188 m asl. Soils are moderately shallow to deep (90-120 cm), well structured, well drained with a silty clay loam to silty clay texture (Table S1).The climate is a tropical highland climate with a moderately cool thermal zone (FAO, 2012). Rainfall follows a bimodal yearly pattern with a long rainy season extending from late March to early June and a shorter rainy season from October to December (Grieser et al., 2006). An automated weather station (TAHMO weather station: Decagon DS-2 sonic anemometer with pyranometer, REC-1 rain gauge, and VP-4 thermometer and humidity sensor with a solar-powered and GPRS-enabled EM50 G), located at the edge of the field, measured air temperature (°C), wind speed at 2 m height (m s −1 ), relative humidity (%), precipitation (mm) and solar radiation (MJ m −2 min -1 ) at a 5 min interval. Daily reference evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) was computed using the FAO Penman-Monteith approach (Allen et al., 1998). Daily weather variables of the entire experimental run can be found in supplementary data (Fig. S1).Banana plantations are composed of individual plants often of different reproductive cycles each growing on individual mats. When referring to a \"plant\" we refer to an individual reproductive cycle. When referring to a \"mat\", we refer to the total composition of different reproductive cycles present in one location. Generally, there are maximally three cycles present on a mat: a mother plant or cycle 1 (C1), a daughter plant or cycle 2 (C2) and a granddaughter plant or cycle 3 (C3). Our research focused on C1 and C2.Two experiments were carried out differing only in cultivar and date of planting.In experiment 1, the East African Highland banana Huti Green (HG, Musa AA Mchare subgroup; (Perrier et al., 2018)) was planted on 3 May 2017. In experiment 2, Grande Naine (GN, Musa AAA Cavendish subgroup) was planted on 17 November 2018. Planting material for both experiments consisted of in vitro plants, hardened in growth chambers and screenhouses. Plant height of HG at planting was 6.6 cm ( ± 2.5 cm), with 4.19 leaves ( ± 1.3 leaves), whilst plant height of GN was 25.5 cm ( ± 4.3 cm) and leaves were 4.75 leaves ( ± 0.74 leaves). Plant holes were 0.6 m × 0.6 m × 0.6 m deep at a spacing 2 m (row) × 3 m (line) (1666 plants ha −1 ). Time is noted in weeks after planting (WAP). In following sections, the different experiments are noted by the planted cultivar (HG vs. GN). Experimental design, management and plant measurements were similar in both experiments unless stated otherwise.The experiments were conducted on fields with no recent history of banana cultivation. The design was a blocked design with drip irrigation as treatment, but given the infrastructure the irrigation treatments could not be randomized.In experiment 1, two blocks were planted with HG. Each block contained five rows of 15 mats, subdivided in three plots of 25 mats (5 × 5), of which the central nine mats (3 × 3) were used for data collection. Each block consisted of a different irrigation treatment, as valves to shut off irrigation were installed at the front of each block. For HG, there were three plots for each treatment. Border mats were used for periodic destructive sampling.In experiment 2, four blocks were planted with GN. Each block contained five rows of 14 mats, subdivided in two plots of 35 mats (7 × 5), receiving two different irrigation treatments. Valves were installed in the middle of a plant row (between mat 7 and 8), therefore two irrigation treatments were present in a block. The central nine mats (3 × 3) were used for growth data collection, leading to four replications (plots) per treatment. The first and last two mats of each row (2 × 5 mats) together with the border rows were used for destructive sampling. Each treatment was replicated four times across the blocks.Mats received a mixture of mineral fertilizers and manure. Mineral fertilizers were split applied: 153 kg N ha −1 yr −1 (urea), 206 kg K ha −1 yr -1 (Muriate of potash), 19.26 kg Mg ha −1 yr −1 and 25.6 kg S ha −1 yr −1 (MgSO 4 ) were applied monthly in the rainy season and every two months in the dry season, while 40.2 kg P ha −1 yr −1 (triple super phosphate) was applied every five months. Twenty L of fresh farmyard cow manure was applied per mat twice yearly before the start of the rainy season. All suckers were allowed to grow until four months after planting (MAP), at which time one sucker of 30 cm height was selected and the others pruned. Each banana mat thereafter was composed of C1 and C2, and de-suckering was carried out afterwards on a monthly basis. Weeds and dead leaves were cut monthly and removed from the field.Three additional leaf pruning events (P) occurred due to the development of Black Sigatoka (Pseudocercospora fijiensis) in the long wet season of 2018 at 2018-05-21 (P1), 2018-06-05 (P2), and 2018-07-30 (P3). At P1 and P2, only the oldest leaves with symptoms of the fungus (yellowing and petiole collapse) were cut. At P3 the oldest six leaves of each plant were cut away to retain the spread of the fungus affecting the older leaves.Each banana row was fitted with two driplines, at each side of a banana mat. Originally each mat's position was fitted with two drippers (one at each side of the mat). Each dripper supplied approx. 4 l hr −1 .Two extra drippers were installed on 6 June 2018. For the HG experiment, this was at 57 WAP and for the GN experiment at 29 WAP.Soil moisture was monitored daily by Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR). Within each plot, the central mat was fitted with two TDR probes installed vertically at different depths: 0−30 cm (horizon 1) and 30−60 cm (horizon 2). TDR probes were installed in the area wetted by the drippers, at 50 cm from the central mat and read out each morning before irrigation by a TDR-200 (Campbell scientific, Inc.). Daily moisture depletion, Dr (mm), was calculated at the plot level as:with Dr,i being depletion on day i, θ FC being the volumetric water content (VWC) at field capacity (FC, [m³ m − ³]), θ i being the actual VWC at day i (m³ m − ³) and Z r being the rooting depth (m). The rooting depth was estimated as a linear interpolation between the depth at 10 days after planting (0.1 m) and at flowering (1 m). Rooting depths were checked every three months over the course of the growing season through root trenching methods. Banana reaches a maximum rooting depth at flowering (Turner et al., 2007), and trenches revealed that roots were continually present until depths of 1 m after flowering in both HG and GN mats, as the soil profile was bounded by a saprolite hardpan layer at 1 m. Depletion values are positive when water contents are below FC and negative when values are above FC. Daily depletion values were compared against the readily available water (RAW [mm]), as an indicator of moisture deficit. RAW was calculated as:with θ pwp being the VWC at Permanent wilting point (m³ m −3 ), p being a depletion factor (-) and TAW being the total available water (mm). The value of p was chosen to be the generic factor of 0.35 for banana as given by Allen et al. (1998). When the D r,i > RAW, plants are assumed to experience moisture deficit. All mats received irrigation until 4 MAP (establishment period). Thereafter, two irrigation treatments were installed: optimal \"full\" irrigation (FI) and rainfed (RF). In the FI treatment, mats received water whenever more than 25 % of TAW was depleted in the first or second soil horizon. Water in the RF treatment was shut off after 4 MAP.Non-destructive plant growth data were measured monthly at the plot level (3 × 3 mats), on individual plants (C1 and C2) present on the mat until harvest of C1 as this corresponds to a CC growth cycle. Every three months, mats (n = 3) were selected in each treatment in both experiments for destructive sampling. Measured variables and variables calculated from growth measurements are listed in supplementary Table 2. As measurements continued on the same plants over time, the data required a repeated measures analysis of variance.CC was determined monthly for each plot, to assess the CC evolution over time. Before November 2017, when plants were small, images were taken at the individual mat level and CC was determined as an average of the CC of mats present in a plot. From November 2017 onwards, digital photographs of every plot were taken with a DJIphantom 4 Pro drone (JPEG, image format, 20 M P, 4000 × 2250 pixels, and 72 dpi) at a height of 35 m above the ground with the center of the plot aligning to the center of the image. Before images were taken, the soil surface was weeded and residues removed.To assess the influence of timing on diurnal CC patterns, CC pictures were taken at an hourly interval between 8 h and 16 h at nine different dates in both experiments: 2018-01-09, 2018-03-08, 2018-04-05, 2018-05-15, 2018-06-14, 2018-08-06, 2018-08-28, 2018-11-28 and 2018-12-17. CC values from the same plots taken at the same day were compared across different time points to assess the effect of timing on CC values.To compare CC values across measurement dates, the earliest CC pictures were used to exclude possible diurnal effects.2.6.1.1. Canopy cover image analysis. ImageJ software (Abràmoff et al., 2004) was used to process images (Fig. 1). First, images of individual mats were cropped to a ground area of 6 m² to only retain the mat of interest, whilst plot images were cropped to retain the central nine mats of each plot (ground area of approx. 54 m²). Each image was cropped four times. Second, CC was calculated based on colour segmentation according to HSB thresholding (Hue, Saturation, Brightness), where threshold ranges for H, S and B were determined for the green CC pixels. All pixels within these thresholds were set to 1 and the remaining pixels were set to 0. A noise reduction was applied so only pixel areas above a certain minimal pixel size were counted as green CC pixels. HSB threshold ranges and minimal pixel size were determined subjectively for each individual picture as lighting conditions in the field were not uniform and did not allow single HSB ranges to be applied to all pictures. The CC was then calculated as: rel i i i , 0 with CC rel , i being the relative CC (0-1) at time point i, CC i being the absolute CC (%) at time point i and CC i=0 being the absolute CC (%) of the first drone measurements of the day.The leaf area index was calculated from monthly collected growth parameters. The leaf area of individual leaves (LA leaf ) was calculated as follows:with LL and LW being the length and width of the leaf i, and laf being a leaf area factor (-). The laf was calculated following Nyombi et al. (2009), from leaves measured during destructive sampling (Fig. S3a).During development, leafs were numbered cumulatively and the LL and LW of each leaf was either measured during monthly growth measurement, at harvest or interpolated between LL and LW of measured leaves leading to a database with LL and LW for each developed leaf (figure S4.), showing the exponential nature of leaf area over time.The total leaf area of a plant (LA plant ) was calculated by summing the area of all the present leaves as:with LA leaf,i is the leaf area of the i th leaf as obtained from Eq. 3, cumO is the oldest cumulative leaf present and cumY is the youngest cumulative leaf present on a plant. Comparison of LA plant, calc with LA plant, measured for destructively sampled plants is shown in supplementary material (Fig. S3b). The total leaf area of an individual mat (LA mat ) was then calculated as the sum of the leaf area of C1 and its successor C2:, 2 ; whilst summing the leaf mat areas of all the nine plants within a plot led to the leaf area plot (LA plot ):. LAI plot was then calculated by dividing LA plot with its ground area (m²).In experiment 1, weak plants due to disease and other unknown factors, were replaced by sucker derived plants on 2017-09-21. The area of the diseased or replanted mats was excluded in further image analysis. The total area of the central plot was divided into nine squares corresponding to the ground area of the single mats. Empty and diseased mat positions were then blocked out, after which the CC was determined on the other plant positions (Fig. S2).Field plots were the experimental units for the statistical analysis. As data were collected from the same plots over time, they constitute longitudinal repeated measures data. We used linear mixed models to analyze the effect of irrigation treatment on: soil moisture, CC growth, LAI evolution, and diurnal canopy cover variation. Differences in soil moisture, LAI and CC used WAP and treatment as fixed factors, and block and plot as random factors. Differences in diurnal CC variation between FI and RF plots used time (h) and treatment as fixed factors, whilst using block and plot as a random factors.CC growth curves were obtained through nonlinear least squares (nls) regression on CC values obtained during the first drone flights of the day, to exclude a potential diurnal CC effect. Observations were average CC per plot level. Curve fitting through these points followed the standard logistic equation as follows:with CC t being CC (%) at time t (WAP), CC max being the max. CC (%), CC ini being the initial CC at planting (%) and r being the CC growth rate (wk −1 ). During regression, WAP was treated as a numeric variable.Residual plots and ANOVA comparison of fitted models were used to determine model selection.To obtain CC-LAI curves for HG and GN, monthly LAI mat values were compared with monthly CC estimates from the obtained logistic growth functions. A functional equation of the Lambert-Beer Law was fitted as:with b being the extinction coefficient and LAI mat being the leaf area index (m² m −2 ). To exclude a potential diurnal CC effect, CC values used were obtained during the first drone flights of the day. Observations were average CC per plot level. Statistical analyses were performed in R version 3.4.3 (R Core Team., 2017). Linear mixed models were fitted using REML with the function lmer from the package nlme (Pinheiro et al., 2019). Plots were made using the package ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016). Nls regressions were performed using the package nls (R Core Team., 2017).During the establishment periods (0-20 WAP) soil moisture depletions did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between FI and RF in both experiments except for GN at WAP 15 when FI plots were less depleted than RF plots (diff=18.27 mm ± 8.69 mm, p = 0.039) (Fig. 2).After the establishment period, differences in soil moisture closely followed the dry season.In HG, soil moisture depletion in the RF plots first became significantly larger at 23 WAP (diff = 54.29 mm ± 19.25 mm, p = 4.22e −3 ) until 45 WAP (diff = 67.62 mm ± 17.50 mm, p = 8.81e −3 ). From 45 until 55 WAP soil moisture depletions were similar (p > 0.05). At 55 WAP, one week after the rainy season ended, RF plots became significantly more depleted than FI plots (diff= 45.80 mm ± 19.06 mm, p = 0.015) until the end of the growth trial (60 WAP [diff=88.94 mm ± 19.06 mm, p = 1.7e −4 ]). Soil moisture of the FI plots exceeded the RAW multiple times during the growing season, so moisture deficit could not fully be excluded in these plots.In GN, RF plots became significantly more depleted from 27 WAP (diff = 17.89 mm ± 8.69 mm, p = 0.04) until the end of the growth trial (57 WAP [diff = 100.07 mm ± 11.95 mm, p < 2e −16 ]). In GN, soil moisture of the FI plots remained mostly below the RAW (except 12 WAP), so plants were considered non-stressed.Irrigation treatment had a significant effect on CC at plot level in both experiments (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3). For HG, CC was reduced significantly in the RF plots from 31 WAP (diff = 7.66 % ± 3.77 %, p = 0.05) (8 weeks after moisture divergence) to 48 WAP (diff= 8.50 % ± 3.77 %, p = 0.04). All nls parameters were significant (p < 0.05) in the regression analyses (Table 1). The growth rate (r) was reduced in the RF treatment (r = 0.12 ± 0.006, p < 8.81e −9 ) whilst CC ini and CC max remained similar (p = 0.2429), leading to a significant CC divergence between 25 and 54 WAP corresponding to the dry season (Fig. 3 and Table 1). HG plots entered the dry season at 20 WAP (Fig. 2) when CC values were approx. 25 % and rapid canopy development was expected to start. CC divergence between treatments reached a maximum divergence at 36 WAP (diff = 17.59 % ± 3.77 %, p = 2.89e −3 ), in the middle of the dry season. From 36 WAP, divergence between curves declined again and became negligible at 54 WAP (p = 0.746). For both RF and FI, CC growth continued significantly from 38 WAP to 50 WAP, the period of flowering of C1 plants.For GN, CC was affected significantly from 38 WAP (diff = 3.54 % ± 1.14 %, p = 0.008) onwards (9 weeks after moisture divergence). The nls regression parameters r and CC max were significantly affected by the RF treatment (p < 6.8e −3 ). Differences in r were statistically significant, but lie very close to each other as shown by the overlapping 95 % confidence intervals (CI): 95 % CI [0.22; 0.25] for RF and 95 % CI [0.21; 0.24] for FI. CC max differences were more pronounced: 95 % CI [83.99; 87.34] for RF and 95 % CI: [87.33; 90.91] for FI (Table 1). GN entered the dry season at 29 WAP, when CC values were approx. 85 % for both RF and FI, hence close to reaching the CC max (Fig. 3). CC max , or the stationary phase of the CC curve, was reached closely corresponding to flowering for C1 (32 WAP to 50 WAP).Due to practical reasons (weather conditions, drone regulations and flight scheduling) pictures of CC could not always be taken at a hourly interval at each day, yet CC was always determined at minimally three time points (Fig. 4).Hour of measurement influenced relative CC (CC rel ) values significantly at all measurement dates in both cultivars (all p < 0.05), but the effect of time on CC rel varied by date. Although significant, time point had a weak effect on CC rel in January, May and June for both HG and GN as CC rel during the day remained close to 1 (Fig. 4). Time effects were more pronounced in March, April, August, November and December 2018 as curves show a more pronounced deviation from the 1 line.CC rel was compared against weather parameters, as similar patterns emerged at the same date in both HG and GN experiments. Daily ET 0 was highly correlated (R² > 0.86) with solar radiation, relative humidity and vapor pressure deficits (other indicators of evaporative demand). Dates with more pronounced CC rel reduction (in both RF and FI) (Fig. 4) were characterized by a higher ET 0 (Fig. 5a). Overall a clear pattern emerges. Under high ET 0 (> 3 mm day −1 ), CC reduces from morning values and reaches minimal values around noon, after which it increases again in the afternoon (Fig. 4).Soil moisture deficits had an additional effect on CC rel patterns, depending on the prevailing ET 0 (Fig. 5b). When ET 0 is low (< 3 mm day −1 ), there is no additional folding with increasing depletion (p = 0.7938). Only when ET 0 increases (> 3 mm day −1 ), do increasing depletion values exacerbate the folding (p = 8.72e −3 ). At low ET 0 (< 3 mm day −1 ), the CC rel is therefore similar in RF and FI, whilst under high ET 0 (> 3 mm day −1 ), increasing depletion leads to a lower CC rel .Destructively sampling plants allowed to establish a laf of 0.66 ( ± 0.018, p < 2e −16 ) for HG, while laf of GN was determined to be 0.75 ( ± 0.012, p < 2e −16 ). Single laf values were used for calculating LA leaf values, as no pattern emerged with increasing leaf size (Fig. S3a).Irrigation treatment had a significant effect on LAI plant and LAI mat in *** † Significant different growth rates between RF and FI plots for Huti Green (p < 0.05). ‡ Significant different growth rates between RF and FI plots for Grande Naine (p < 0.05). § Significant different maximum canopy cover between RF and FI plots for Grande Naine (p < 0.05). both experiments (Fig. 6). In HG, LAI plant and LAI mat were significantly reduced by drought from 31 WAP onwards (p < 0.05). Fungus pruning started at 55 WAP, after which LAI could no longer be calculated due to the big size of the plants.In GN, LAI plant of C1 increased steadily until the first onset of flowering (32 WAP), after which there was a big drop in LAI plant of C1 due to leaf pruning at 37 WAP (P3), whereby the lowest six leaves were cut from all plants in both FI and RF (Fig. 6). LAI plant of C1 was significantly reduced in the RF plots from 42 WAP onwards (p = 0.009), whilst LAI plant of C2 was affected from 46 WAP (p = 1.65e −5 ). LAI mat behaved similarly and started diverging from 42 WAP onwards (p = 5e −4 ).As such, LAI in both experiments reacted to moisture deficit at about 8-9 weeks after soil moisture divergence, similarly as CC values.LAI mat values were used to create CC-LAI curves for both cultivars, which follow an exponential function (Fig. 7).CC and LAI were accurately fitted by the Lambert-Beer equation for both cultivars. HG had significantly lower extinction coefficient (b = 0.51 ± 0.0038, p < 2e −16 ) than GN (b = 0.67 ± 0.0046, p < 2e −16 ) showing that at a similar LAI, a lower CC is reached in HG.Total precipitation received during the C1 growth cycle (lasting over 60 WAP) was about 1403 mm for HG, and 1607 mm for GN. Total amounts might be sufficient for optimal banana production (1100-2650 mm yr −1 ) but not evenly spread, as there were two distinct rainy seasons interrupted by dry spells of more than two months implying the need for irrigation (Robinson and Alberts, 1986;Van Asten et al., 2011;Varma and Bebber, 2019). FI plots received 3416 mm (HG) and 4400 mm (GN) over the entire growing season, compared to RF plots which received 1770 mm (HG) and 1340 mm (GN) during the first 4 MAP to establish the fields. As growth was significantly reduced in RF plots, irrigation proved necessary in Arusha for both experiments.CC in both experiments was significantly affected by soil moisture deficit (Fig. 3), but timing and severity occurred at different developmental stages in the experiments (Fig. 2). Divergence of soil moisture in HG started at the start of the exponential growth phase (23 WAP) when CC values were approx. 25 %. As drought coincided with the beginning of the exponential growth phase absolute CC differences were more pronounced, and became first significant (diff = 7.66 % ± 3.77, p = 0.05) at around 8 weeks after the onset of soil moisture differences (31 WAP). At 36 WAP, in the middle of the dry season, CC in FI plots was 17 % ( ± 3.77) larger than the RF plots (p = 1.65e −4 ).For GN, the absolute effect of drought on CC was less, as CC reached about 85 % at moisture divergence (29 WAP onwards), and most of the leaves of C1 had already formed so close to flowering. CC differences between RF and FI plots became significantly different from 38 WAP onwards (diff = 3.54 % ± 1.15), about 9 weeks after soil moisture values started diverging indicating moisture deficit to have an effect on the CC even close to flowering.CC as such reacted quickly to moisture deficit in both experiments. Drought induces stomatal closure, reducing transpiration, photosynthesis, thereby reducing leaf area and leaf emission rate (Kallarackal et al., 1990;Thomas and Turner, 1998;Taiz and Zeiger, 2002;Carr, 2009) both playing a role in CC formation. As new leaves emerge at the top of the pseudostem, and newly formed leaves cover older ones, a reduction in leaf appearance rate and a corresponding decrease in leaf area of new leaves due to moisture deficit, will have a significant effect on the CC, depending on the severity and timing of drought. Indeed, CC and LAI (Figs. 3 and 6) were both significantly reduced by moisture deficits in both experiments.Logistic growth curves accurately captured CC growth for both HG and GN although CC values were slightly overestimated (1-2 %) at the beginning of the growing season for both experiments (Fig. 3). Over the full growing season, this initial overestimation is negligible.For HG, CC growth curves for RF and FI deviated more and hence a CC divergence from optimal values during the vegetative stage can therefore be a good indicator of moisture deficit. Similar CC max values were reached due to the occurrence of the rainy season between 43 and 54 WAP, allowing mats in RF plots to reach LAI mat values leading to near maximum CC (Fig. 7). So even though LAI mat differed significantly (Fig. 6), CC did not differ significantly (Fig. 3 and Fig. 7).For GN, the growth rate r was slightly increased under moisture deficit, but this statistically significant difference leads to very small CC growth curve differences. CC max differed significantly which is due to differential leaf formation in C1 and C2 after soil moisture divergence (Fig. 6). Even the last developed leaves before flowering of C1, and leaves of C2 therefore have an effect on overall CC, albeit a smal absolute effect given the exponential nature of the CC-LAI curve (Fig. 7).Similar CC max values of approx. 90 % were reached in both experiments under FI, being close to values in other crops under optimal spacing: peach 93 % (McClymont et al., 2005), apple 93 % (McClymont et al., 2005), Amaranthus 95 % (Bello and Walker, 2017), cabbage 95 % (Wellens et al., 2013), vining pea 95 % (Paredes and Torres, 2016), cotton 90 % (Farahani et al., 2009), maize 90-95 % (Hsiao et al., 2009). CC max values of 100 %, while theoretically possible, are rarely reached even with dense planting.Commonly used densities of HG is 2 × 2 m (2500 plants ha −1 ) and of GN is 3 × 2.5 m (1333 plants ha −1 ) respectively, and differed from the used planting density (1667 plants ha −1 ). Different CC curves would be obtained with these spacings, where CC curves (Fig. 3) would shift upward for HG (faster CC growth), and downward for GN (slower CC growth). Then, differences between cultivar CC curves might not be as pronounced as now. Additional research should look at the CC evolution in plantations under different densities planted at the same time to see the density effect on CC growth curves.CC showed a significant diurnal pattern on days characterized by high evaporative demands (ET 0 > 3 mm day −1 ) in both experiments (Figs. 4 and 5). Overall a clear pattern emerged. Under high ET 0 (> 3 mm day −1 ), CC reduces from morning values and reaches minimal values around noon, after which it increases again in the afternoon (Fig. 4). The larger the daily ET 0 , the larger this CC reduction at noon (Fig. 5a). On days of high ET 0 , soil moisture depletion in RF plots significantly increased the CC reduction at midday (p < 0.05) compared to FI plots (Fig. 5b). Hence, both environmental stimuli and the soil moisture deficit status play a role in diurnal CC patterns. We hypothesize this CC pattern to occur due to leaf folding of banana plants.Leaf folding occurs in well-watered, non-stressed banana plants and typically follows a diurnal rhythm with leaf halves bounding a single plane aligning the midrib during the night and early morning, becoming more vertical (fold downward) during periods of high evaporative demand and returning to their original position (fold upward) in the late afternoon (Milburn et al., 1990;Thomas and Turner, 1998;Turner and Thomas, 1998;Turner et al., 2007;Carr, 2009).Leaf folding in response to drought is still debated, but some research suggests diurnal leaf folding to be more pronounced under drought (Milburn et al., 1990;Thomas and Turner, 1998;Turner and Thomas, 1998), whilst others refute this claim (Lu et al., 2002). Our results indicate leaf folding indeed is increased under drought, given ET 0 is high enough.Other plants also exhibit leaf folding at field scale under drought. Maize, rice, wheat, and sorghum (amongst other grasses) roll their lamina upward transversally to the mid rib under stress conditions due to a drop in water potential (turgor) in the leaf. Leaf \"rolling\" results from varying degrees of dehydration in different cross sections of the rolled leaf (Kadioglu et al., 2012). Rolling in maize leaves follows a diurnal pattern whereby maximum closure is reached at solar noon during days of high evaporative demand, but not present in well-watered plants. Leaf rolling in grasses is therefore a visible indication of moisture deficit and also present at the canopy level (Baret et al., 2018).In banana, leaf folding results from differential turgor of cells in the leaf pulvinar bands, following a similar process as changes in stomatal aperture which are being controlled by the turgor of the guard cells (Satter and Galston, 1981;Turner et al., 2007). Diurnal leaf folding in banana may therefore be due to changes in leaf turgor pressure on a diurnal scale. Zimmermann et al. ( 2010), studied the effects of environment and irrigation on leaf turgor pressure using a leaf patch clamp pressure probe on diurnal timescales. They showed leaf turgor varied diurnally in both irrigated and non-irrigated plants plants. Generally, leaf turgor pressure declined from morning values, reached a minimal value around noon after which turgor increased again in the late afternoon and during the night. On days with high evaporative demands, turgor pressure drops were more pronounced, indicating leaf turgor pressure reacted directly to the environment. Under optimal irrigation, turgor pressure dropped less and recovered during the night, whilst under sub-optimal irrigation turgor pressure drops were more pronounced and did not recover. They concluded turgor pressure amplitudes and stabilization time might therefore be indicators of moisture deficit on a diurnal scale (Zimmermann et al., 2010).Given our findings and the fact leaf turgor plays a role in leaf folding, we hypothesize the diurnal CC pattern to reflect these diurnal turgor pressure pattern in a leaf. At high evaporative demands (possibly exacerbated by soil drought), leaf turgor drops, resulting in folding of the leaves and closing of the stomata. We hypothesize the bigger the evaporative demand, and the more soils are moisture depleted, the more leaf turgor is affected leading to a more pronounced leaf folding and a more pronounced diurnal CC pattern. Further research is needed to prove this hypothesis.CC diurnal patterns by themselves are not good indicators of moisture deficit, as they do not occur when ET 0 is low and occur even in well irrigated plots when ET 0 is high. However, comparison of irrigated with non-irrigated plots on days of high ET 0 could indicate moisture deficit due to an increased and prolonged CC drop at midday. This diurnal CC pattern needs to be taken into account when creating CC curves for crop growth modelling. CC pictures need to be taken early in the morning (< 8 h) or in the evening (> 18 h) to reduce the CC variation and make use of optimal light conditions.As banana cultivars are phenologically diverse, it is necessary to determine a laf to correctly determine the LA leaf for each cultivar. Laf was 0.66 ( ± 0.004, p < 2.2e −16 ) for HG, and 0.75 ( ± 0.004, p < 2.2e −16 ) for GN. These values are in the range of published laf values (Obiefuna and Ndubizu, 1979;Blomme and Tenkouano, 1998;Nyombi et al., 2009). Using the laf for HG and GN, LAI mat values for HG and GN ranged between 0 m 2 m -2 and 5 m 2 m -2 (Fig. 6 and Fig. 7) corresponding with the LAI range noted in commercial plantations (Turner, 1972(Turner, , 1998;;Turner et al., 2007).CC-LAI relationships were obtained for both cultivars with LAI mat being composed of both C1 and C2 (Fig. 7). The CC-LAI relationship was exponential as in wheat, Triticale and maize (Hsiao et al., 2009;Nielsen et al., 2012). At a similar spacing, CC-LAI curves differed significantly (p = 4.731e -10 ) between the two cultivars. HG had a significantly lower extinction coefficient (b=0.52 ± 0.006) than GN (b=0.67 ± 0.004), indicating that at similar LAI values a lower CC will be obtained for HG. This can be due to the ploidy of the cultivars as diploids (HG) exhibit more erect leaves than triploids (GN). At similar LAI values, erect leaves cover less ground than more horizontal leaves. This remains speculation, as to test whether it is a ploidy effect, rather than a cultivar effect, more cultivars need to be tested.Overall, CC, LAI and corresponding CC-LAI curves are influenced by cultivar, plant spacing, mother-daughter relationships and management and environments (Turner, 1998;Turner et al., 2007;Wellens et al., 2013). Hence a single CC-LAI curve cannot be proposed for banana (Musa spp.). Changing plant density to optimal densities for HG (2 m × 2 m) and GN (2.5 m × 3 m) would shift the CC-LAI curve upward for HG, and downward for GN, bringing them closer together.CC growth, and growth curves where significantly affected by moisture deficit, indicating CC growth over time can be used as an indicator of moisture deficit in plantations. Over a growing season, both CC and LAI were significantly reduced 8-9 weeks after moisture divergence between the RF and FI plots in both experiments. Solely using CC as an indicator of growth, however does not allow to separate the effect of drought between the different cycles, and therefore CC curves over time can only be used as indicators of the total plantation reaction to drought. When separating growth of the different cycles, LAI is of better use as this can more easily be separated between mother and daughter plants.On a daily timescale LAI remains stable, whereas CC varies according to evaporative demands and moisture depletion. At low evaporative demands, CC did not vary significantly. At high evaporative demands CC was reduced at midday, with reductions being increased by increasing soil moisture depletion. In view of this diurnal CC pattern, we hypothesize CC drops to reflect the leaf turgor pressure, which has proven to vary similarly on a diurnal timescale and plays a role in leaf folding. More research is however needed to prove this hypothesis. Daily monitoring of CC at morning compared to midday might be an indicator of soil moisture deficit if a reference plot that is fully irrigated is present.CC-LAI curves for both cultivars followed the Lambert-Beer law, with both cultivars having significant different extinction coefficients. CC-LAI curves are expected to depend on the plant spacing and used cultivar, as the difference in extinction coefficient might be due to the different leaf physiology of the used cultivars.In summary, CC as an indicator of growth offers potential in monitoring soil moisture deficit in banana plantations."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2595143667.json b/main/part_2/2595143667.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8fc2387884a4e0ffbd537b9e66263ab9bb90930c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2595143667.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4455c56875c737852e245a79a5fd773c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/41c5a984-a8c3-4003-b83b-80b7722f8958/retrieve","id":"1110827401"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f92df7c7-e764-4c55-a64d-c036205f5f41","content":"Titles in this series aim to disseminate interim climate change, agriculture and food security research and practices and stimulate feedback from the scientific community.iLa política situada en territorios altamente desafiantes ha sido fuente de debates, concentrador de recursos, investigaciones e intervenciones de organismos internacionales, locales, nacionales, entre otros. Muchos de estos espacios expresan altos niveles de vulnerabilidad al clima, fragilidad social y bajo desarrollo económico, como lo es el corredor seco centroamericano especialmente la región hondureña. La interdependencia de factores sociales y ambientales demandan el accionar de múltiples instituciones para mitigar y hallar soluciones, cada una desde sus capacidades y experticias a los diferentes estreses que afecta la región. Esto constituye un sistema complejo al incorporar acciones, actores y temas dinámicos que configuran un sistema con múltiples capas analíticas (multiplex).En línea, frecuentemente se menciona las ventajas de las redes institucionales, sin embargo, estas en muchas ocasiones no son suficientemente entendidas para identificar sus estructuras, problemas y las oportunidades que puedan emerger. En este sentido, la red institucional del corredor seco se presenta como un caso de interés académico y científico, la que demanda ser estudiada, en su estructura y relaciones para fortalecer el impacto y eficiencia en sus acciones a nivel territorial. Metodológicamente se ha reconocido a la ciencia de las redes como la base conceptual y técnica para estudiar estos sistemas, dado las capacidades computacionales y matemáticas que esta ofrece. Consecuentemente, el documento aporta elementos metodológicos para entender las dinámicas sociales y territoriales, así como su integración con estudios prospectivos en contextos de cambio climático y de vulnerabilidad climática, obtenidas mediante entrevistas y revisión de fuentes secundarias.Al abordar las temáticas de cambio climático, seguridad alimentaria y agricultura fuertemente vinculadas en el espacio hondureño, y después de aplicar el método indicado, se logró identificar patrones relacionales no alineados entre las entidades institucionales y los territorios, develando una especie de desacople entre las vulnerabilidades futuras y las acciones de la red en las regiones. Adicionalmente, la estructura relacional se muestra disortativa es decir que las entidades y sus vínculos configuran relaciones que tienden a conectarse con nodos más centralizados, lo que limita una mayor diversidad de interacciones reforzando una densidad muy baja de relaciones. También, existen subgrupos de instituciones y municipios con patrones relacionales caracterizados por una alta dependencia a instituciones o territorios, la cual agrega complejidad en la navegabilidad de la red además de una alta modularidad entre las entidades sociales y territoriales.Las redes de institucionales tienen un rol social y económico de alto valor, al contribuir a la reducción de brechas sociales, protección del medio ambiente, la reducción de la pobreza, el mejoramiento de la infraestructura, transferencia tecnológica, entre otros. Las redes ocupan un papel relevante en el entorno científico y político, pero se demanda un mayor nivel de entendimiento acerca de su funcionamiento e inclusive de cómo se transfiere y promueve la adopción de tecnologías y políticas en los espacios locales (Martinez-Baron et al., 2018).Hay una amplia literatura sobre el rol de las redes institucionales y socio ambientales acerca de las intervenciones en los territorios para adaptar los impactos de origen antropocéntricos, en diferentes sistemas complejos (Castillo-Villanueva & Velázquez-Torres, 2015). Dentro de varios beneficios de estas redes, se encuentran; a) economías de escala en recursos compartidos y experiencia técnica, las cuales permiten reconocer y hacer explícitas interconexiones y retroalimentaciones entre sub-disciplinas, también aumentan la escala temporal y espacial de los recursos existentes (Gardner et al., 2013), b) son flexibles, pueden favorecer la adaptación a la constante evolución de los problemas socio ambiéntales (Mertens et al., 2011;Sandström & Carlsson, 2008), c) el capital social generado fortalece los procesos de gobernanza ambiental. Esta puede reducir los conflictos, fomentar la confianza, disminuir los costos de inspección y consolidar el grupo internamente para la gestión colectiva de los recursos naturales comunes (Pretty & Ward, 2001), d) las conexiones entre diferentes grupos sociales y en diferentes niveles también tienen el potencial de promover el intercambio de información y la colaboración entre actores con diversas experiencias a fin de garantizar la flexibilidad y adaptabilidad (Newman & Dale, 2007).Por otra parte el corredor seco hondureño es considerado como una de las regiones con un alto riesgo climático medido por la organización German Watch métrica que considera eventos como tormentas, inundaciones, temperaturas extremas, olas de calor y frio (Kreft et al., 2016). También, expresa un desarrollo local estancando y frágil en donde la región se ha mantenido un patrón espacial-temporal de desarrollo bajo medido por el IDH, con valores índices entre 0.6 y 0.7 (Gonzalez et al., 2019a), es decir, poca movilidad hacia una prosperidad social en el tiempo.Para ello, se enlistan las siguientes actividades; a) caracterizar la red de actores institucionales y sus relaciones dimensionales entre estos, b) explorar las interacciones de la red a nivel municipal, c) identificar potenciales distancias entre la intervención institucional y las necesidades locales de adaptación al cambio climático.El camino metodológico incluyo un trabajo de campo por medio de entrevistas a las principales instituciones y una revisión de fuentes secundarias, sin embargo, en respuesta a las dificultades asociadas al COVID19 se tuvo un menor numero de respuestas de las esperadas. Los insumos se dieron en términos de categorías de análisis tales como los atributos de las instituciones (actores) y las aristas(links) en los tres componentes de estudio (ver instrumento en el Anexo A). Entre tanto, el análisis de redes sociales permitió procesar los datos mediante matrices y vectores obtenidos en las entrevistas para dibujar métricas relacionales, por medio de lenguajes de programación para su procesamiento. Con estas técnicas se obtienen métricas sobre el funcionamiento de la red a nivel general y el comportamiento local de los nodos o miembros (Conway, 2009).En la tabla1 resume las técnicas utilizadas y la base conceptual para el desarrollo del estudio (la descripción técnica de los métodos están en el anexo B). Para las actividades asociadas a la caracterización de la red de actores y sus interacciones con los municipios del corredor seco se desarrollaron en dos momentos de análisis, 1) entre los mismos actores (nodos de color negro) y 2) otro entre instituciones (nodos de color naranja) y territorios, mediante algún mecanismo de gobernanza o intervención, como lo son proyectos, planes, entre otros.Igualmente, es importante considerar que las fuentes secundarias, fueron utilizadas para identificar las relaciones y los atributos de los miembros cuando las entrevistas no fueron suficientes o no se pudieron llevar a cabo.Fuente: Autores, se entiende por SAN, como seguridad alimentaria y nutrición Las estructuras de redes expresan complejidades tanto en sus conexiones como en la extensión e intensidad de las acciones desarrolladas, por lo tanto, las gráficas son una fotografía parcial de la red territorial de actores. Por otra parte, aunque existen limitaciones en una total representación de todos los involucrados en el corredor seco, el estudio y su enfoque de análisis de redes sociales (Aggarwal, 2011;Conway, 2009) como enfoque técnico, aporta elementos de utilidad para interpretar, mapear este sistema socio ambiental.La aplicación del instrumento y la recolección de los datos estuvo afectada con la pandemia causada por el COVID19, lo que modifico el plan, la estrategia y la cobertura. El personal asignado para estas actividades estaba en edades de riesgo, lo que agrego más desafíos. Sin embargo, con una actitud entusiasta y utilizando los canales virtuales se logró obtener una cantidad suficiente de información para continuar con el estudio.Lo siguiente son algunos puntos a tener en cuenta: Dominio y alcance espacial de los actores: El ejercicio de levantamiento de la información estuvo espacialmente delimitada para las organizaciones que tuvieran influencia e interacciones mediante proyectos, ejecuciones, estudios y demás en el corredor seco.Variables y relaciones dimensionales de interés: La topología o aristas de interacción entre instituciones se agruparon en los temas de cambio climático, seguridad alimentaria y agricultura. También, la información asociada a las relaciones entre instituciones y los municipios fue abierta a las diferentes acciones disponibles y conocidas en el trabajo de campo y en la revisión de literatura.Diseño y difusión del instrumento: Se diseñó una encuesta la cual se encuentra en el anexo A. La misma fue alojada en canales virtuales y distribuida por medios de correos electrónicos acompañada de una carta de presentación con una explicación sobre el propósito del estudio. En otros casos, ambos documentos fueron impresos y entregados físicamente en las instalaciones.Detalles del trabajo de campo: este componente integro las siguientes acciones, a) revisión documental de material institucional y de medios virtuales, b) la elaboración de un directorio de instituciones existentes a nivel nacional, regional y local que trabajan en el corredor seco, el cual fue fortalecido con información facilitada por algunas Mancomunidades que funcionan en la región, c) la aplicación del instrumento de 30 preguntas a 55 instituciones, tres de ellas aplicadas a la misma institución, pero a diferentes instancias debido a su importancia en el tema investigado.Limitaciones del estudio: En general, fue complejo y difícil obtener respuesta de las instituciones gubernamentales, por lo cual en la mayoría de casos se solicitó apoyo de la Oficina de Transparencia Institucional, no obstante, la información proveída por las instituciones abordadas fue escasa, a excepción de la Unidad Técnica de Seguridad Alimentaria (UTSAN)Se enlistaron y detectaron 167 organizaciones en el estudio perfiladas en tres niveles a)Internacionales, b) Privadas y c) Públicas (ver Anexo C). Se destaca, la presencia de organizaciones de origen extranjero, en donde operan 30 organizaciones de cooperación internacional, tales como bancos de desarrollo, organizaciones científicas, de cooperación internacional entre otras. También, el papel de las instituciones de educación superior y sus relaciones en la región se expresa limitada y débil en términos relativos considerando el mapa total de actores, registrando la presencia de 4 actores de fuente privada y 2 instituciones públicas (ver tabla 2). Fuente: Autores, *las organizaciones denominadas como mancomunidades y asociaciones de municipios a nivel regional, se caracterizan como organizaciones privadas, pero con propósitos de gobernanza y gestión pública.Alrededor de 384 interacciones fueron identificadas, sobre los temas claves tales como agricultura, seguridad alimentaria y cambio climático, entre otros, los cuales están visibles en el gráfico 1. Las interacciones pueden ser de solo un tipo (ejemplo, solo financiación, o solo cooperación técnica), o por lo contrario mutile. Es así, que 167 actores, han desarrollado un total de 99 interacciones en temas de agricultura, 122 en cambio climático y 163 en temas asociados a seguridad alimentaria. Se destaca este último con mayores vinculaciones en temas relacionados en cooperación técnica y financiera.La figura 1, revela como las combinaciones de cooperación técnica, cooperación técnica y financiera han sido los tipos de relaciones más frecuentes y prevalentes entre las organizaciones en la región de interés. Sobre las topologías, la seguridad alimentaria se muestra con el mayor nivel de aristas, también se destaca las bajas interacciones asociadas a temas de comunicación, asesoría e inclusión social.Fuente: AutoresSe puede visualizar en la figura 2, la estructura de interacciones agrupadas que han operado en el corredor seco (zona cuadro verde). Data su estructura, se pueden identificar patrones de colas largas y gordas (cuadro rojo) en algunas relaciones entre nodos, es decir que hay Colas gordas los actores. Distribuyéndose de la siguiente manera; un 83% de vinculaciones se definieron como de alta intensidad, seguida de un 13% mediana y un 5% de baja.alimentaria cuenta con un 42%, cambio climático con 32% y agricultura del 26% del total de interacciones.Fuente: Autores. Mediante el algoritmo de visualización Fruchterman-Reingold, se da prioridad a los nodos con mayores niveles de interacción en el centro del grafo o de la red.Las métricas permiten parametrizar la estructura de la red, sus dimensiones y características en dos bloques, a) patrones globales (ver tabla 3) y b) patrones locales (ver tabla 4). En este orden, la densidad muestra una baja interacción completa entre los nodos, es decir que solo el 2.7% de las interacciones posibles han sido efectivas entre todos los actores identificados.Esta estructura, revela que hay actores con cierto nivel de centralidad medido por los grados(links), con un 21% de las interacciones concentradas por nodos centrales. Otra característica de la red, es la presencia de módulos o bloques, medida por el coeficiente de modularidad de 0.53, indicando la presencia de aglomeración de nodos con distancias cortas con sus vecindades que con otro grupo de nodos. También, la relación entre actores en el corredor seco revela tiene patrones disortativas es decir que los actores de menor interacción buscan relacionarse no con sus pares sino nodos con mayor nivel de centralidad y conectividad. Por último, en promedio la red de actores del corredor seco está configurando cerca de 5 vínculos con otras instituciones. La tabla 4 muestra el top de las 15 primeras instituciones con mayores niveles de interacción (por grados y links), en donde se destaca la posición de UTSAN con 29 interacciones, definida como una organización publica con funciones de gobernanza. Igualmente, se destaca nodos con mayores niveles de centralidad basada en la intermediación, tales como UTSAN y la CASM. Esta métrica local, identifica los actores con las posiciones internas mejor localizados de acuerdo a las estructuras relacionales. Esta medida paramétrica, considera que los actores mejor localizados pueden tener una mayor importancia en la ejecución, diseño y participación en múltiples proyectos en la región. En línea, esta red tiene múltiples combinaciones y tipologías (también se les denomina atributos de grado) donde se destaca la cooperación técnica y financiera con un 39% de participación en el total de las relaciones de esta capa, seguido de la cooperación técnica con un 36%. También, los asuntos comunicacionales y asesoría social representen las dinámicas menores frecuentes en la región (ver tabla 6) Las relaciones más frecuentes están asociadas en cooperativas técnicas y asesoría social con un 51% del total de vinculaciones en la zona, otra combinación importante es la financiera, comunicación y técnica en un 30%. Respecto el ranking de nodos más conectados de la tabla anterior y por dimensión relacional, se explora el vecindario alrededor de estas organizaciones lideres (figura 3). Para todos los casos, se muestra variado y con múltiples tipos de organizaciones, además de conectarse entre sí. El corredor seco presenta cierta similitud la región Amazónica en términos de la internacionalización de sus problemas. Este fenómeno atrae esfuerzos transnacionales para su atención, las que se manifiestan en diferentes de acciones tanto económicos, como transferencia de tecnología, investigación y desarrollo, entre otros. En Honduras, el desempeño de las temas sociales y ambientales han sido elementos convocantes a la participación e intervención internacional, con 45 organizaciones de origen externo de cooperación internacional, investigación y organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro operando en el territorio.La interacción de las instituciones de educación superior se presenta tímida en sus dinámicas con bajos números en comparación con otros actores, es decir, no se identificaron como nodos activos en el corpus de las interacciones. En la misma línea, hay baja visibilidad de actores privados o proyectos de empresas dentro de la red de actores en el corredor seco.Las categorías de cooperación técnica y financiera en cualquiera de sus combinaciones son las más prevalentes especialmente en temas de seguridad alimentaria. Es decir, que el flujo de transferencia de conocimiento, técnicas, y tecnologías además de recursos financieros han sido más orientados en mejorar el acceso a alimentos a la población.La red de actores presenta una estructura con una baja densidad en la interacción de estos y una alta centralidad de las relaciones en pocos nodos. Esto podría expresar cierto nivel de fragilidad de la red y simultáneamente una oportunidad para robustecer la red de actores.Mapa institución del corredor seco tiene patrones de egoredes, colas gordas y relaciones disortativas lo que dificulta la navegabilidad de las relaciones entre los actores, es decir la baja densidad y conectividad e interacción entre actores es débil.En este capítulo se presenta un análisis que integra las instituciones y los municipios del corredor seco, como se mencionó en la metodología antes descrita. La figura 5 visualiza las intervenciones más frecuentes por instituciones que operan en el corredor seco hondureño, estas opciones fueron agregadas dado que las organizaciones en muchos casos tienen diversas acciones, entre las más relevantes están; a) cambio climático, b) negocios, políticas y promoción del sector agrícola, c) nutrición, salud y seguridad alimentaria, d) atención, prevención y gestión de riesgos naturales, e) servicios financieros, micro seguros y créditos, entre otros. Se pueden consultar la lista completa en el anexo D.Fuente: Autores La relación entre las instituciones y los municipios está representada en por la figura 6. Por medio de esta, se puede visualizar patrones de colas gordas y estructuras de relaciones de estrellas especialmente en relaciones que se ubican en las áreas periféricas de la red. Este patrón, revela una importante dependencia en dos sentidos a) muchos municipios están interactuando con pocos actores instituciones y b) muchas instituciones están vinculados con uno o pocos municipios. Para el caso a) implicaría una estructura de especialización en la atención a nivel territorial pero también podría expresar relaciones egocéntricas con alto nivel de riesgo y fragilidad. El caso b) implicaría un territorio con alta demanda de atención o concentración de acciones, también se podría configurar un proceso de sobre presencia de actores institucionales en una misma región.Igualmente, el grafo revela grupos o estructuras de ego redes en las periferias, así como un centro con alta interacción. Este núcleo con alto dinamismo (área roja) expresa una relación diversa y participativa, por el contrario, las relaciones periféricas muestran quizás un desaprovechamiento de toda la concentración de relaciones e intervenciones (área verde y gris). Simultáneamente, hay un patrón de escalas de relaciones entre las instituciones y son En línea, la posición interna de los actores tanto municipios como instituciones, indica en nivel de involucramiento en el total de las relaciones de intervención en la región. Los municipios con mayor concentración de vínculos institucionales y las instituciones con mayores niveles de intervención están contenidos en la tabla 13. En cifras, el municipio 801 (ver Anexo E) concentra aproximadamente el 9% de las aristas institucionales, seguido del municipio 1201 con un 6.5%, etc. Paralelamente, las organizaciones AMHON y COMPASSION tienen una vinculación cercana al 9% del total de relaciones entre actores y municipios. Lo siguiente, es establecer vinculación espacial entre los niveles de interacción de las instituciones en los territorios (figura 7 izquierda, mayor información ver lista detallada en el anexo E) y la distribución espacial de los niveles de vulnerabilidad al cambio climático estimado en el estudio \"Distribución espacial de la vulnerabilidad futura bajo escenario de cambio climático. Serie 3. Análisis municipal para Corredor Seco hondureño\" (Gonzalez et al., 2019b). Este documento, calcula a nivel municipal un indicador de mide el nivel de vulnerabilidad considerando varios vectores de variables agrícolas, sociales y de capacidades instituciones en el corredor seco mediante la metodología de la IPCC usando en varios estudios similares (Bouroncle et al., 2017;Parker et al., 2019), este se puede ver visualizado en el espacio en la figura 7 derecha.Uno elemento que se puede visualizar de los mapas es un patrón disímil entre la fuerza de intervención de la red institucional y los municipios que expresan mayor nivel de vulnerabilidad climática. Hay municipios que proyecta menores niveles de exposición al cambio climático, pero con altas niveles de presencia institucional en las mismas regiones, potencialmente por requerimientos y necesidades diversas e históricas sin superar. Cruzando los indicadores mencionados, se reúne un número de municipios que se localizarían en las categorías de enlistadas, las variables \"Interv\" corresponde a las clases de municipios con alta, moderada, media y baja niveles de intervención, expresando un potencial desacople entre las ambas categorías con un total de 31 municipios con un muy alto y alto nivel de vulnerabilidad con un muy bajo nivel de intervención (ver figura 7 y 8). Las acciones contenidas en la categoría de educación y capacitaciones, se muestran con baja presencia en los municipios con altos niveles de vulnerabilidad. Al igual con temas como el fortalecimiento productivo, infraestructura y pobreza, se pueden ver en los mapas de calor en el eje x las categorías de vulnerabilidad climática y en el eje de las y están los ID de los municipios del corredor seco hondureño.Las acciones de relevancia son las asociadas al cambio climático y la presencia en los municipios con diferentes niveles de vulnerabilidad, en los mapas de la figura 11 se pueden identificar el número de acciones acorde a las categorías mencionadas. En el mapa A y C se observa que los municipios cuentan con una menor cantidad de intervenciones por parte de la red institucional, pero si una mayor exposición y riesgo al cambio climático con alrededor de 2 a 3 intervenciones. Contrariamente los municipios con muy baja vulnerabilidad cuentan con una mayor intervención entre ellos especialmente el distrito capital (ver figura 11).Del total de intervenciones en el corredor seco el 33% están concentradas en municipios perfilados como de alto riesgo climático, de este porcentaje apenas el 9% y el muy alto un 3% está asociado alta nivel de acciones y alta vulnerabilidad (Ver anexo F) Las acciones asociadas a seguridad alimentaria, nutrición y salud, también muestran una tendencia similar al tópico de cambio climático, en donde la mayoría de las acciones se despliegan en territorios que expresan una vulnerabilidad potencial en la adaptación al cambio climático baja (véase las figuras 10A y 10C). Por otra parte, hay regiones en los niveles de riesgo en donde coincide con bajos niveles de intervención por parte de las instituciones.Considerando el total de las acciones detectadas, se estima que un 30% de estas se concentran en territorios que han sido catalogados como de alta vulnerabilidad climática y un 12% con un muy alto riesgo climático (ver anexo F). El porcentaje de intervenciones no superan una participación del 12% del total del accionar institucional. En cuanto al sector agrícola se mantiene un patrón de disimilitud de los dos temas anteriores donde los municipios con alta vulnerabilidad no son necesariamente las de mayores niveles de (ver figura 13). Del total de intervenciones relacionadas con agricultura el 34% se localizan en municipios catalogados como de alta vulnerabilidad y un 12% en un muy alto riesgo climático (ver anexo F). Se destaca que el 16% de las altas intervenciones se desarrollaran en tales municipios, y un 5% en los que más han expresado mayor fragilidad al clima. Los resultados indican la oportunidad para estimular un dialogo nacional con los actores para realizar ejercicios de que apoyen las validaciones geográficas de sus intervenciones.Dado que estos revelan patrones de municipios con alta atracción a las acciones a la red de actores en corredor seco. Esta concentración de medidas, recursos y proyectos, no son necesariamente iguales en el territorio. De nuevo, desarrollar una agenda nacional de cooperación entre la red de actores para lograr desarrollar una estructura de intervenciones menos concentrada y más preparada para los desafíos futuros de la región. En línea este ejercicio de dialogo nacional entre las redes ambientales sobre sus operaciones acciones podrían mejorar la representación y efectividad de las acciones en donde los desafíos situados supera la capacidad estatal. Hay varios asuntos que pueden ser de interés, tales como insumos para validar la presencia en las regiones, las potenciales trayectorias y dinámicas sociales, agrícolas y climáticas que podría tener un territorio donde hacen presencia. Así mismo, la sobre intervención de algunas regiones y el rezago de otras. Es necesario, ajustar acciones, fortalecer temas y mejorar la cobertura.La estructura de relaciones entre instituciones y territorios es diversa y expresa relaciones de alta dependencia a nivel municipal por la atención de actores con sus medidas e intervenciones. Existe una especie de regiones menos intervenidas especialmente las más lejanas a los centros y polos económicos.Hay diferencias espaciales entre la intensidad de intervención institucional y los niveles de vulnerabilidad potencial a nivel municipal. Esto plantea varias cuestiones sobre la necesidad de explorar con mayor precisión las capacidades territoriales, estimulando procesos de colaboración profunda, mejor ajuste en las dinámicas integrativas y de cooperación entre las organizaciones.La red de actores tiene una baja conectividad en la dimensional de cambio climático entre actores en la red institucional, pero si cuenta con una mayor dinámica entre instituciones y municipios se evidencia más dinámica, por lo que se puede visualizar una oportunidad de fortalecer a las instituciones en la región dado la intensidad y la importancia territorial. No debería ser una competencia de actores hay espacio para proyectar una mayor cooperación entre instituciones.El sector educativo especialmente de nivel de superior registra una baja interacción con otros actores, o por lo menos no fueron mencionados como actores fundamentales en los contextos base evaluados.Las acciones de cambio climático, seguridad alimentaria y agricultura, capturan el 80% del total de las intervenciones detectadas para más de 150 municipios del corredor seco.Estas acciones estas no están distribuidas de forma simétrica u homogénea en el espacio, lo que tiene sentido, considerando que hay regiones con mayor demanda de recursos y desafíos por atender. Sin embargo, en termino de construir capacidades futuras de adaptación al cambio climático, la estructura de ego redes y la alta dependencia los territorios a pocas instituciones, parece estar reforzando un potencial desacople a nivel territorial. Esto ofrece una oportunidad de calibrar las acciones colaboracionistas en la red considerando que la senda actual tiene una perspectiva de flujos de una inadecuada preparación en los tres temas priorizados. 1.Cooperación técnicaImplementación de proyectos/ actividades 4.visualización Incidencia en políticas públicasAsistencia crediticiaAsesoría LegalDifusión de tecnologíaAsistencia TécnicaCoordinación interinstitucionalVinculación con el estudio Descripción a) Facilita información sobre las estructuras relacionales de las instituciones que operan en el corredor seco. b) Produce métricas para medir los patrones y tipos de relaciones entre los actores por dimensiones relacionales. c) Facilita la exploración y simulación acerca sobre la fragilidad o no de la red institucional.Análisis de redes sociales o Social Network Analysis (SNA) (Aggarwal, 2011;Conway, 2009). Este método de tratamiento de datos ordenados, provee visualización y métricas para abordar temas de vinculación entre actores (instituciones, personas, artículos, regiones, etc). Ofreciendo patrones locales (número de contactos-degree, posición en la red, influencia, entre otras estadísticas por nodo-miembro) y patrones globales de análisis (nivel de compactación de la red, densidad, nivel de centralidad, patrones de asociación, entre otros). "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2600636543.json b/main/part_2/2600636543.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca3fd1fc2ea71bc90786996a793c3c8292546b3b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2600636543.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c231e00387d3fef4cb62483b7c42b8ce","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/85424d60-ab22-4eb6-90ae-af4ed84e2ead/retrieve","id":"-1534615808"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5269819f-8ecf-4667-872c-c40eb3fa8de9","content":"WP 5 seeks to leverage, assess, accelerate, and scale the use of digitally innovative solutions to address climate change induced challenges across FVCs. This work package focuses on accelerating and scaling digital climate services, financial solutions and other technologies that improves the climate resilience of FVCs. Objectives: ❑Build the climate resilience of anchor countries' agriculture providing accessible and relevant climate analytics and information through digital advisory tools. ❑Integrate accumulated knowledge and available science innovations of CGIAR developed initiative into local platforms and NARS systems to mature into climate services through incubators and startups. ❑Ensure better integration of created products and digital services in the national system being co-developed by local stakeholders and involvement of private sectors.RQ 5.01 What climate information data and services do agricultural food value chain (FVC) actors need to manage climate risks in the CWANA region? RQ 5.02 How can agri-and market-advisory scaling up strategies for climate-resilient FVCs be socially inclusive, effective and sustainable? RQ 5.03 How can the enabling environment for the efficient and inclusive adoption of the best digital agri-climatic digital bundled services and solutions be improved to accelerated scaling? RQ 5.04 How can digital innovations that support the creation of climate resilient FVCs be scaled out for maximum durable impact? -Farm to basin smart tools for water efficiency and management -Weather station based irrigation schedulingIncubation program: WP5 will set up with partners an incubator platform to nurture high potential innovative digital solutions, providing end-to-end support to regional innovators:• Identification of needs and potential solutions, challenge calls & hackathons • Support to develop and implement business plans • Access to CG science, analytical capacity (e.g. climate modelling) and matching with CG scientists • Matchmaking with investors at different stages of innovation (grants/donors, venture capital, impact investors)Policy platform: In cooperation with other WPs, we will engage at policy level to strengthen the policy/regulatory/enabling environment for digital innovation (e.g. preparing digital agriculture profiles and contributing regional/national policy forums)Capacity building: Capacity building on digital tools/innovation will be provided to traditional partners (e.g. NARS) "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2607625494.json b/main/part_2/2607625494.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e32759d7af573e710032a859de519d02111e965 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2607625494.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5e8adee684c44e2ed2d7c92f258fb691","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4cc8670a-e332-44a5-9727-bd855e905391/retrieve","id":"-136538839"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"05ca0856-4f57-4830-b6c7-5aaba69f35a1","content":"Empowering Farmers Through Multimedia Engagement Within this SBCC intervention lies a comprehensive suite of multimedia resources produced by the \"Certi ed Seed ENOSURE\" campaign designed to inform, inspire, empower, and improve access to quality seed in the target farming communities.A series of carefully crafted radio spot scripts and radio drama episodes were developed and broadcast through the popular BIG FM 97.6 station, directly providing information to over 850,000 farmers across ve districts, including over 150,000 in Butaleja alone, delving into the bene ts of improved seed varieties from higher yields and disease resistance to enhanced nutritional content while providing practical guidance on good agronomic practices.In addition to the crafted radio spots and drama episodes, the WP 6 team, in partnership with BIG FM 97.6, hosts an agricultural talk program every Friday from 6-7 PM, educating farmers on the different aspects of access to quality seed and associated agronomic practices. To further amplify the reach and impact of this agriculture talk program, the project collaborates with two community radio stations in Nawayo and Masimasa sub-counties to tune into BIG FM and relay information to a broader audience. These strategic partnerships ensure that even the most remote communities and those without access to a personal radio can access this vital knowledge. Additionally, the radio spot scripts and drama episodes are broadcasted three times daily (9 AM, 1 PM, and 6 PM) on the community radio systems to educate and engage the target audience continuously.Recognizing the power of visual cues, the project has also produced two short videos on seed multiplication and production of quality declared seed (QDS) and 1,000 posters and yers featuring the trusted \"Certi ed Seed ENOSURE\" campaign. The visually striking posters and yers are crafted to resonate with smallholders, particularly women and youth, who may have historically faced barriers to information, to empower them to try new farming techniques. The materials discuss the importance of using certi ed seeds over recycled old seeds, contributing to increased productivity and income.The impact of these targeted SBCC campaigns is already evident. Listenership data from BIG FM 97.6 reveals that the agriculture-focused programming has the highest engagement among the station's offerings, indicating that the radio content effectively resonates with the target audience (64% of the respondents who lived in areas that could hear the radio programs listened to the agricultural program). Furthermore, insights from focus group discussions and key informant interviews with farmers and community leaders indicate a shift in knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward accessing and adopting high-quality seeds. For instance, women reported actively engaging in seed selection processes, demonstrating con dence in seed quality assessments. Similarly, youth are interested in learning about improved seed varieties and cultivation techniques, showcasing a shift from passive observers to proactive participants in seed-related activities. Community leaders have also observed an increase in the willingness of women and youth to experiment with and adopt high-quality seeds of improved varieties, re ecting a growing inclination towards sustainable agricultural practices and a stronger drive for self-su ciency.Smallholder bean and rice farmers reported a deeper understanding of the bene ts of access to quality seed of improved varieties, expressing greater con dence in their ability to access and cultivate quality seed of improved varieties successfully. farmers, especially women and youth, purchasing and using the high-quality and improved bean and rice seeds endorsed by the \"Certi ed Seed ENOSURE\" campaign. In the Naweyo sub-county, an estimated total of 210 farmers (160 women, 50 men) out of the 868 farmers in the project have so far accessed quality bean seeds through the campaign during the August-November 2024 growing season. In the Mazimasa sub-county, over 310 farmers (92 women, 218 men) out of the 910 in the project have obtained high-quality improved rice seeds, signaling a transformative shift in seed adoption.Additionally, due to the campaign, four women seed multipliers in the Naweyo sub-county have established bean seed production and marketing enterprises, collectively expecting to produce over 0.8 metric tons of quality bean seeds. In the Mazimasa sub-county, 8 women seed multipliers have kickstarted their seed businesses, which are expected to generate a total of 4 metric tons of quality declared seeds (QDS) during this planting season (August-November 2024). The onboarding of women as seed multipliers and their participation in seed enterprise represents a shift in the social and cultural norms or barriers that discriminate against women to limit their involvement in the seed sector.This increase in demand for quality seed and enhanced participation of women in seed multiplication business not only re ects a change in attitudes and behaviors but also has a direct impact on the livelihoods of the target communities. Farmers report an expected increased productivity and incomes, as the improved seed varieties deliver higher yields, greater disease resistance, and enhanced nutritional content. For instance, the four women-led bean seed enterprises in the Naweyo sub-county expect to earn over $2,100 collectively. underscores the power of tailored SBCC campaigns to drive meaningful change within smallholder farming communities.By addressing the speci c needs, barriers, and motivations of the target audience, the project has been able to effectively reshape knowledge, attitudes, and practices around seed access and adoption. The multimedia approach, combining radio broadcasts, video, print materials, and community engagement, ensures widespread reach and relevance. As the global community continues to grapple with the challenges of food security and sustainable agriculture, the Butaleja experience is a compelling example of how SBCC initiatives can catalyze transformative change at the grassroots level. By empowering smallholder farmers, particularly women and youth, to access and use quality seeds of improved varieties, the project not only enhances agricultural productivity but also contributes to the broader goal of improving livelihoods and fostering resilient, equitable food systems. ----------------- "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2608281727.json b/main/part_2/2608281727.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99d1a366d52a2991b3002512f66c2e881de6b4d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2608281727.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b63190b8fd5f2aee30ea872e9f4c1443","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ee2e090a-bb0f-4e04-9f96-3250d603d772/retrieve","id":"813208800"},"keywords":["Climate service","entry-points","nutrition landscape","Vietnam"],"sieverID":"eb296771-be08-4065-b72a-2bdfd93b694e","content":"Titles in this series aim to disseminate interim climate change, agriculture and food security research and practices and stimulate feedback from the scientific community.World over, 821 million people one in nine go hungry each night, while one in three suffer from some form of malnutrition (World Food Program, 2019). Over the years, strident progress has been made in addressing the issue of global hunger in spite of an increase in he d a i he ab e be f h g e e ha g e d i he a several decades (World Food Program, 2019). Yet, their distribution and the progress has not been uniform. The vast majority of the world's hungry people live in developing countries (World Hunger Statistics, 2019), and the steady decline in world hunger that characterized the past decades is not true anymore (SOFI 2019 -The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World, 2019). The situation is worsening in South America and most regions of Africa, while the rate of improvements in nutritional outcomes in Asia has significantly slowed down (WHO, 2018).This directly threatens the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 2 that aims to e d h ge achie e f d ec i a d i ed i i a d e ai ab e ag ic e b (Martin, 2019). Much troubling still is the long-term developmental consequences of hunger and malnutrition among mother and children. Nutritional status of e d i g eg a c i a e ia he he hea h a e a f hea h fe a growth and development (Bhutta et al., 2013). Just as importantly, early childhood nutrition is essential to their growth and cognitive development thereby influencing their development potential (ibid.) (Nurliyana et al., 2016).Climate change has contributed to the recent reversals in the progress made in tackling global hunger and malnutrition. It has a disproportionate effect on the poor and marginalized populations; by exacerbating poverty and inequality it hinders poverty reduction measures. A rather direct effect of climate change can be observed through i c ea ed c i a e a iabi i hich i defi ed a he a ia i i he ea a e a d he sta i ic f he c i a e a e a a d a ia ca e be d i di id a ea he e e (CCl FAQs | WMO, 2019). As a result, agriculture has become riskier as extreme events become more frequent and seasonal patterns have been disrupted, thus undermining food security particularly among rural households.In such a scenario, accurate and localized climate information can go a long way in mitigating uncertainties and informing agricultural decisions. The process of generating and applying climate information for decision-making and climate-smart policy is termed as climate services (IRI, 2018). Climate services can help inform adaptation strategies to minimize the stress placed by highly variable rainfall, increased temperature, and extreme climate events on food production, and thus human diets and nutrition.ACToday is a project that aims to combat hunger by increasing climate knowledge in target countries. In Vietnam, one of the six target countries, IRI is working with CIAT and other local partners for identifying linkages among climate, food systems, diets and nutrition. Over the summer of 2019, the team set about to identify policies, programs and stakeholders engaged in improving nutritional outcomes, with the objective of identifying entry-points for climate services.The exercise should serve as a current state assessment of the development landscapewithin Vietnam with a focus on nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions. The following sections of the report contain a description of the activities undertaken as part of the exercise and the key findings. Interventions or programs that address the immediate determinants of fetal and child nutrition and development adequate food and nutrient intake, feeding, caregiving and parenting practices, and low burden of infectious diseasesExamples: adolescent, preconception, and maternal health and nutrition; maternal dietary or micronutrient supplementation; promotion of optimum breastfeeding; complementary The study was conducted for the ACToday Vietnam team, in collaboration with the CGIAR In line with the above objectives, a combination of desk-based research and interviews with key stakeholders, were used to gain information on:1. existing nutrition-specific and sensitive programming and policies, and the extent to which climate has been considered in these programs and policies;2. seasonal variation in the implementation of programs and policies; The interventions were examined for inclusion of climate and gender considerations. While a more robust method for such an examination required qualitative coding of documents, this was de-prioritized owing to limited time. The list provided an effective starting point for identifying key stakeholders. There were considerable gaps in the information collected in this way, and interviews with key stakeholders were planned to rectify this.Task 2: To identify the key food and nutrition stakeholders in the country and their main roles and responsibilitiesThe goal was to collect information in order to: 1) identify potential interviewees; 2) identify organizations that could increase their use of climate services; and 3) provide guidance to ACToday for potential partners moving forward. National and international stakeholders working in the field of food systems were identified through secondary research. In addition, we identified their specific sector of interventions and potential role in the use of climate services. This task was carried out simultaneously with Task 1, and included gender and climate considerations too.One of the challenges related to examining the relationships among climate, food systems, diets and nutrition is the lack of research that has examined these linkages. However, in many cases there are climate and nutrition data available that can be linked in order to examine these relationships. The purpose of this activity was to identify existing data that is available in the country that could be combined with climate data to examine these important relationships. Coordinator in Vietnam. The questionnaire was shared beforehand, both as part of the formal process of seeking appointment as well as to help the interviewees anticipate and prepare for our questions. The interviews were semi-structured, i.e., they were mostly conversational and flowed from the answers provided by the stakeholders, while covering the topics provided in the interview guide.Ideally, the mapping exercise would have benefitted from additional iterations of secondary and primary research. Once again, paucity of time precluded such an approach. Nutrition-related intervention and policies Appendices 1.1 and 1.2 provide a list of key nutrition-specific and sensitive interventions in Vietnam that are either ongoing or have concluded in the recent past. While these also include specific policy interventions, they key amongst these are large-scale programs such as A4NH and CCAFS that serve as platforms for collaboration.The lists have been color-coded depending on whether they are focused on stimulating demand by generating awareness amongst population through education and counselling, or whether they are intended to regulate the supply side, so as to encourage availability of healthier food options. Certain programs are comprehensive in design and therefore influence both the supply and demand-side. The color classification scheme is provided at the end of Appendix 1.2.Appendix 2 provides a descriptive analysis of the major stakeholders organizations and platforms that are working on research, development, policy advocacy, capacity building and management (non-exhaustive list). They span across the public, private and non-profit sectors. In addition, a list of prominent stakeholders in the field of agriculture and food security within Vietnam that participated in the workshop on platforms for healthier diets in Vietnam were considered. The inter-connection between the different platforms and their relative importance in terms of their membership size is illustrated in Figure 2. Among these, the organizations that most notably serve as common nodal agencies are highlighted in Figure 3. Appendix 3 provides a list of existing food and nutrition related database along with the key indicators that these survey track. General Statistics Office (GSO) and National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) were identified as the key stakeholders responsible for producing primary data on nutritional outcomes in the country, with the support of multilateral institutions and other non-profit agencies.While the secondary research helped map a high-level nutrition landscape of Vietnam along with their key stakeholders and interventions, there remained substantial information gaps.Interviews with key stakeholders were used to bridge these gaps as well as to identify nutrition programs that may be climate sensitive. By understanding the challenges faced by the key stakeholders and through questions that emphasized the linkages between climate and nutrition, we could identify the extent to which climate data informed decision making.This helped acknowledge existing capacity constraints and to identify the possible entry points where climate information may be leveraged to help ameliorate nutritional challenges.Vietnam could benefit from increasing the use of climate data to drive decisions both by applying it in existing sectors more intensively, and by using climate data in new sectors. This is of particular importance in a country with numerous and distinct geosystems that are highly vulnerable to climate change (IPCC, 2019;Tatarski, 2018).From our interactions with experts in non-profit and public sector, we were able to identify critical gaps that were echoed across multiple interviews. Climate data as received by NIN proves inadequate to meet their needs primarily due to the lack of predictive capacity 2 attributable to low spatial resolution. This is further complicated by highly localized occurrences such as heavy rainfall, which affect some communes of a district and not others. As a result, there has been some loss of credibility as after a few instances of false positives warnings that are not followed by actual disasters farmers stop heeding warnings, and as a result may suffer greater damage.Both government and academic agencies have acknowledged the need to improve their ability to record, process and consume climate-data. Currently, these agencies lack substantial in-house capacity to identify and analyze the appropriate climate indicators that influence their respective interventions.Intent: The e f c i a e he c f d e a d i i a c e while understood in the academia, is not sufficiently reflected in the government interventions. For instance, nutrition surveys, so far, do not rigorously capture climate-related data. As a result of this, climate data do not appear to be the key drivers of policy decisions. This may indicate the need for increased information dissemination and collaboration between academic and political institutions within the country.Investment: Current infrastructure for acquiring weather-data and disseminating climate information is unable to meet the requirements for the end-user as well as the targets set for themselves by the concerned stakeholders. This capacity constraint will only become more acute with increasing climate-change induced climatic variations and frequency of extreme events.Integration: Climate services are applicable across a wide range of sectors. This requires coordination among multiple departments not only to acquire and analyze climate data, but to customize climate information for specific application and timely dissemination across concerned geographies. Poor communication and coordination between the different ministries in charge of different aspects of climate-related policies was mentioned by several respondents and have likely resu ed i incoherent, diverging, competitive or even conflicting policies (Pham et al., 2018). In addition, the lack of coordination is not exclusive to government alone, but also affects the non-profit organizations (Bakker & Herens, 2019).While we identified a number of constraints that prevent optimal usage of climate data, specifically in the field of food systems and nutrition, the experts and representatives that we interviewed were optimistic in their outlook. Together from the information gleaned through secondary research as well as from the suggestions provided by our key informants, we have identified several potential entry-points that would enable and improve the integration of climate data into program design and decision-making.1) Improving inter-agency coordination and data interoperability: Linkage of data between MARD and NIN remains a challenge. Currently, no integrated database exists. Previous collaboration between governmental and non-profit agencies to prepare a common framework integrating the climate, agriculture and nutrition database met with certain challenges. It is intended that the findings from thisIn addition to climate, gender was one of the lenses through which we analyzed the nutrition landscape of the country. While a significant share of effort in terms of policies and interventions e e f c ed i i g e hea h he a ge remain passive recipients of such benefits. As highlighted in our interview with the gender expert, gender issues in Vietnam maybe more difficult to analyze as compared to other regions such as South Asia, for instance. Compared to the latter, women in Vietnam have been rather actively involved in agricultural and household decisions and yet still face similar issues of time-poverty and vulnerabilities that women in more orthodox societies have had to face.On a positive note, government agencies in the interviews have acknowledged the need to do more in the gender space. While gender-specific initiatives or policy are missing, some degree of integration has occurred: MARD supports women in improving their access to credit, providing support to build their own household business models (e.g. pig-rearing) along with capacity building to take charge of their livelihoods, such as cash transfers and vocational training. For example, when supporting farming cooperatives, the project requires a minimum 50% women representation in the management board.NIN focusses on vulnerable population including pregnant women and mothers, but The key government and academic institutions that we interviewed are cognizant of the importance of climate in food and nutrition, but agree that further action is required on this end. They demonstrated a high willingness for collaboration on topics identified above. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2618050972.json b/main/part_2/2618050972.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e8d77122c8959b6f1f4f5e0719aec99e4684557 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2618050972.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e48bd0cf526a0f025d38aea11f1413ef","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H037510.pdf","id":"909983160"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a6240fc0-05ed-4dd7-89ea-6ebc3ab54f7a","content":"Most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have embarked on Integrated Water Resources Management. As part of these reforms in the water sector, many governments are considering and others have already implemented the legal tool of water rights allocation and have linked the same to water tariffs. This paper analyzes formal and factual payment-linked water right systems in the agrarian economies of Sub-Saharan Africa. The formal water management tools, as formulated in the water policies and laws are analyze and compared with the early experiences of implerrientation and impacts on the ground, in particular in• Tanzania. The paper further examines whether in reality the original objectives of the water rights and water tariffs are attained or not; the potentials of the water rights and water tariffs, and the present and possible pitfalls of the same. The paper also identifies the problems that are encountered in the administration and the enforcement of these tools. Finally the paper draws the generic conclusions, which also draw upon lessons learnt in Australia and the USA, highlight the conditions in SUb-Saharan Africa under which the managerial aims of payment-related water right systems can be reached, but also the conditions under which the tool creates new problems without solving existing problems, and thus should be abandoned.Most countries in the Sub Saharan Africa have been reviewing water policies, laws and legislations and management strategies in quest to implement Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) in the past two decades. The diminishing quantities of water, coupled with increased water uses due to increased population and improved technologies have further necessitated the review mechanisms. Tanzania, South Africa and Zimbabwe have been in the forefront of these changes. This paper focuses on such changes with a specific case of water rights in the Rufiji Basin in Tanzania. The paper argues that although water rights have been operational since the colonial era in Tanzania and that although both are tied together now, water charges were introduced later with a different purpose altogether. The paper starts by describing the background of the study area and the methodology employed by the study, and then focuses on the inherent management challenges of water rights with a specific attention on the potentials and pitfalls of the same. Finally, the paper identifies the management gap and proposes a way forward. Water allocation and management in the sub Saharan Africa has been for long determined by the local customary arrangements that existed among the local communities in specific river basins. Although formal water management and legislation was later introduced by colonial rules through various Water Ordinances in the early 1900s, the practical day-to-day water management in the grassroots is still widely influenced by the latter.In Tanzania specifically, seeking to favour the white settlers, the colonial minority introduced centralized water authority and water use registration. By 1948, the British colonial government had vested absolute water authority in the colonial rulers 3 • Several ordinances were transposed from England and/or India to intensify the same. After independence in 1961, the new government continued the principle, declaring that 'a/l water in Tanganyika is vested in the United Republic' under the Water Utilization (Control and Regulation) Act 1974, section 8. The Act echoed the Water Ordinance of 1959, by governors and then ministers were to delegate water control authority to various officers and water bodies.The framework for integrated water resources management is laid out in the Water Utilisation (Control and Regulation) Act 42 of 1974, as amended by Act 10 of 1981. The Water Utilization Act (Control and Regulation) remains the supreme law on water management in Tanzania. Both criminal and civil laws guarantee the sanctity of water management organs under this Act. Other pieces of legislation touching upon water matters in Tanzania include the Waterworks Ordinance, Cap.128 and Urban Supply Water Act, 1981. There are also many institutions interested in water:' However, in Tanzania, institutions that are involved in water management are loosely connected and lack basic coordination (DANIDAlWorld Bank, 1995). They are sectoral and fragmented with no coordination (Water Policy Draft 2002).The Rufiji basin is the largest of the nine river basins in Tanzania, draining a total area of about 177,000 km 2 (URT, 1995). It is made of several river systems, the largest and most important of which is the Great Ruaha River (GRR) system. The Great Ruaha River is draining an area of about 68,000 km 2• The Great Ruaha River originates from a number of large and small streams at the northern slopes of the Poroto and Kipengere mountains in the Southern Highlands between Mbeya and lringa. It flows to the Usangu plain where several other rivers flowing from the highlands join it; namely Mbarali, Kimani and Chimala whereas the small ones include Umrobo, Mkoji, Lunwa, Mlomboji, Ipatagwa, Mambi and Mswiswi rivers.During the rainy season, the Great Ruaha River spills onto the Usangu plains, forming the Usangu wetlands (Western-Utengule and Eastern) and feeding a perennial swamp (/hefu) within the Eastern wetland. It then flows through Ng'iriama (an exit to the Eastern Wetland) on to the Ruaha National Park providing the main water source to the park and to the Mtera dam, which is the main electrical generating source in Tanzania (accounting for 56% of the runoff to Mtera dam). As it flows down, it is joined by Little Ruaha River before being joined by the Kisigo River. It then passes through the Mtera reservoir, before flowing westward to the Kidatu reservoir, being joined on the way by the Lukosi and Yovi rivers. From the Kidatu reservoir then it flows into Kilombero Plains before joining the Rufiji River Oust above Steigler's gorge), collecting en route the Kitete and Sanje rivers.The Great Ruaha River serves many uses and users as it flows, including irrigation, hydropower generation, livestock, domestic uses, fisheries and aquatic flora and fauna. Irrigation is the major activity and largest water user, mainly during the dry season. Other water-related livelihoods include fishIng, livestock keeping and brick making. Problem arises in the dry season where conflicts and disputes over access to water become common. As much water is diverted to the fields for irrigation and brick making, the reduced river flows fail to supply full requirements downstream. This has brought a lot of environmental concems after the massive mortality and stresses to aquatic ecosystem. Downstream of the RNP there are two hydro power stations (Mtera and Kidatu) depending much on the basin for their water for power generation, contributing about 50% of the Tanzania national grid.This study was conducted under the DFID funded project, RaiSing Irrigation Productivity and Releasing Water for Intersectoral Needs (RIPARWtN) in the Mkoji sub-catchment of the Great Ruaha River Catchment in the Rufiji basin between July 2002 and October 2004. For the sake of clarity. the catchment was divided into three hydro-geo agricultural zones, namely the upper catchment, middle areas and the lower plains. In each zone, two villages were selected, making a total of six villages. Three Participatory Rural Appraisals (PRAs) were conducted, one in each zone gather preliminary information on the subject matter. Semi structured interviews were then done with identified respondents followed by a Focus Group Discussion in each zone where ten key informants and eight district officials from the two districts of the Mkoji Sub catchment were involved. The respondents were invited in the role play River Basin Gamel workshop. The findings were then analysed and feed back to the respondents through another River Basin Game workshop.Managing the Business: Water RightsAlthough popular and widely outspoken as a water management tool, managing water rights is quite a challenge in Sub Saharan Africa. Unlike elsewhere in the world, the region is characterised by many poor smallholder who are widely scattered and use very poorly developed (local structures to draw water). In such a set up, it is not easy to ascertain what quantity of water is exactly drawn, or to predict the quantities in future seasons. In the Mkoji Sub catchment where this study was done, of the 120 irrigation off-takes that were observed up to 71(58%) were local temporary structures popularly known as 'dindilo'.The study also found out that the procedure for application of water rights is long, complicated, time consuming and bureaucratic and is too much wanting for poor water users to attain. The applicant is required to fill in an application form (5 copies) and submit them to the Water Officer (or to the Regional Water Engineer, in cases where there is not a Basin Water Board). A letter from the Village Government where the abstraction will take place must accompany the form. If it is a large project, the applicant is required to submit an Environmental Impact Assessment (EtA) report to the Water Board. The Water Officer registers the application and prepares an official notice setting out the particulars which is published in the Government Official Gazette, served upon affected persons, and displayed at the office of the district in which the right will be exercised. After receipt of any further reports required by the Water Officer, the application is submitted to the Water Board for deliberation and decision. This unduly long procedure does not sufficiently encourage local water users to apply for water rights. For example, in the six villages studies, hardly a quarter (25% and 17%) of two villages knew the procedure. In the remaining four villages, nobody knew the procedure!In Tanzania, categories of use are classified in an order of priority as a guide only, and not as a directive. In granting a water right, the use of water for domestic supply is given the first priority6, and then the use for livestock, irrigation, and hydropower generation, industrial and mining purposes. Environmental water requirements are paramounted higher, only next to domestic needs. This is an important turning point in that the national water management frameworks recognises, at least theoretically, the human and livelihood needs for water and those of the environment for a better sustainable ecosystems. Furthermore, taxation and charging for water introduces a realization of value for water resources. The National Water Policy (2002) expresses the same expectations of taxation. The practical implementation of this argument (,enhancement of water fees and pollution charges as an incentive for water conservation and pollution control, and as a source of funds for water regulation activities, catchment conservation, and water resources monitoring' (World Bank 1996 Annex A» would be via the water officers.'The basin water offices will be mandated to collect revenue such as fees and charges and to be used to meet the cost of regulatory functions and financing of water resources assessment services. The basin water offices and basin water boards will be required to account for the use of these funds, which will also be audited annually by Government auditors as is occurring with other public funds' (World Bank 1996 Annex A).Volume-based rate setting may seem objective and fair. However, in the absence of any objective basis to assess the volumes allocated and, thus, to set volume-based rates, Water Officers can only rely on their subjective judgement. Even nominal differences by ranking structures according to their sizes appeared difficult. In the Mkoji sub-catchment, for example, the volumes and related fees for the larger structure Inyala A were initially set at lower rates than for a nearby smaller structure of Inyala B. The water users complained. In this case, the water officer accepted the complaints and changed the fees the other way around. In other cases there is enormous confusion among small-and medium-scale users in the Upper Ruaha about the amounts to be paid (Sokile, 2003;Gaussen 2003).Water Officers at the various levels have been mandated to collect and transfer public money. However, accountability procedures in carrying out this task are weak. The Water Office responsible write receipts for taxes received, but an administrative system that inserts fee payments into the computer excel sheet of registered water users is still absent. Further, when submitting the collected funds from the sub-catchment office to the basin office in Iringa, the accountant notes the amounts in the books. A public auditor is supposed to check the various amounts, but the auditor's willingness to check the money contributions to basin offices is limited. The public auditor's key interest is the publicly allocated funding from Government. Without a sound transparent system to administer and justify money flows, the basin and catchment level officers render themselves vulnerable to accusations of corruption.Conceptually, the whole notion of water rights is alien and prejudiced in origin, purpose and practice. Procedurally, the water rights system is wanting. The application process is unnecessarily long, bureaucratic and time consuming; a typical kind of discouragement for weak applicants. As it is now, the procedure is not pro-poor nor does it seek to empower the grassroots water resource users to acquire a water right. One of the recent paradigms in managing water rights is their strong linkage to water charges. This new water rights and taxation system was promulgated in 1994 and refined in 1997 and 2002, every time without public consultation. The system requires everyone in Tanzania using even a little bit of water for production to register to obtain a 'water right certificate' from the Ministry of Water and Livestock Development. Registration costs TSh 35,000 (about US $ 35.00) and the annual economic water fee of at least TSh 40,000 (US $ 40.00) per year.Introduction of water fees and the subsequent tier of the same to water rights is seemingly an un realised objective. Introduction of water fees was conceivably based on some four key assumptions: a}. 'Payment for water would deter overuse and hence avoid waste of water' World Bank 1996). This was expected to mitigate this real or perceived growing water scarcity. b}.'Payment for water, coupled with water rights would reduce water related conflicts'. c}. 'Payment for water would generate income to sustain water management initiatives'. Gauging the objectives, our findings revealed the converse: Paying for water has distorted the local customary arrangements for water allocation and management and has sufficiently influenced a change of behaviour among water users, ironically for worse for the water sector! Three window periods can be identified as a consequence of water fees, as shown in table 1 below: application fees and water user fees, by 40%, farmers felt more value (1997 -2000) in total amounting to TSH 240, of water, more water conflicts 000.00 (90,000.00 and 150,000.00 erupted, land values rent values for Inyala A and B respectively), increased in the irrigated areas distributed to individual farmer, each from TSH. 20,000.00 per acre paid an average of 4000.00-another before water fees to 40,000.00 sum was to sustain the local office.per acre Farmers formulated water roasters Conflicts reduced within the Water fees for rationing water; Farmers agreed schemes, but intensified operational to restrict area under crop between the schemes. The cultivation to 0.25 acre and agreed upstream abstractors would on various by-laws to enforce the take all water from the river to roasters justify their fees.The other side of the drawback of water fees has been that the revenues accrued from water are far low below targeted amount, because water user charges are very low compared to investment and introducing higher charges would be challenged by exacerbating rural poverty and may trigger a lot of political concerns. Actual collections are below average. Only some 39% pay the levies, majority of who are domestic water users and large-scale private companies. Large scale state irrigation schemes and individuals are the leading culprits in not paying for water. The government agency responsible for collection of fees apparently spends more time and resource to collect less fees-thus costing both the government and the agency! Inherently, the payment mechanism has some weaknesses. Billing mechanism is confusing water users since they do not know whether the prices are estimated for the wet season or for the dry season. As such those who use water only in dry or wet season questions the legitimacy of paying for wet or dry season respectively. Since volumetric water pricing is based on the water rights, there is always a temptation to raise more income through issuing more water rights. As a consequence, some rivers would be more abstracted than other, depending on the awareness and willingness of the water users to apply for water rights. For example, the Mlowo River in Moji Sub catchment has 19 water rights amounting to more than 4.1 cumecs against the peak average river flow of hardly 2.1 cumecs.The present water rights systems, as widely advocated for, are now being used as a registration, taxation and water management tool. While initially the water rights were meant for water uses registration and allocation, their use as a taxation tool is quite recent With the newly introduced purpose of taxation, the entire purpose of the water rights has been distorted, with even the fonner fl!fl1ctions being• counter-produced.Water rights: A Management Failure?Operationally, water rights system fails to fully meet their objectives in the Rufiji basin. Water rights system fails as a registration tool. Establishing and maintaining water users register is a challenge due to fluctuating numbers hundreds of small-scale users. Even with lists, establishing location of users andl or estimates of volume of water used is more difficult, especially without the bureaucracies, maps, and measuring devices required. As such, there are only partially aavailable data for water uses users names and site estimates without correct volumes abstracted. Any attempt to qualify and maintain this infonnation is undoubtedly expensive.(a) Water rights system also fails as a taxation tool in that unlike the popular opinion (World Bank, 1991), taxation cannot recover costs of water management nor deter water use. This is unlikely because blanket charging rarely act as deterrent to resource use, if any, aggravates the use (Sokile & van Koppen, 2003;GWP, 2000). In the Mkoji sub catchment, experience has shown that fanners expanded their field and water related conflicts increased with the introduction of water charges. Furthermore, with a weak registration tool renders the system even weaker as a taxation tool, resulting in both inequity and ineffiCiency. Lack of coherent accountability system for monies collected, if not checked, may result into a 'corruption by design' phenomenon.Managing water through water rights is still a challenge for Tanzania. The water fee, seen as 'water taxation', antagonizes people in the Upper Ruaha Sub-Catchment, because they suddenly have to pay the government without seeing any improved water or support service. Issues of legitimacy for payment, equity in allocation, cost-recovery mechanisms and the general collection, maintenance and upkeep of water rights systems infonnation is still wanting. Unlike the expectations of the government through the World Bank support. the introduction of water charges and fees has not sufficiently improved water management imperatives but rather, has complicated the matter.The paper recommends that registration of water users should be done include only large scale users who are easily reachable and accessible. The records should be kept in ledgers and electronically with sufficiently detailed infonnation possible, which indicate, among other things, grids and volumes abstracted and should be reviewed at least on annual basis.Similarly, payment for water should be strictly tied to the volumetric abstraction and should"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2622848355.json b/main/part_2/2622848355.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45d4bb7487cea5df22334edcb17d8d5e04454f9e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2622848355.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a348b2e76e57e109951f1077ef2d003f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8dcb32b1-c7d7-4f7e-b2a6-db272ba1b55f/retrieve","id":"-1515516501"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"aa886cc6-3cbd-49d5-bda4-66ecb29a7bc5","content":"Objectif. Ce guide a pour objectif de vous pennettre de: Comment la eonsistance de l'endosperme determine-t-eBe la classification des varieUs? Que signifie l'expression \"utilisation nette\" de proteines? Quel type de msis fournit une qusntite considerable de vitamine A? 12 Citez les faeteurB lIf'fectant la valeur nutritive des plats prepares /I. base de msis. Quels sont les elements nutritifa preaents en faible quantite dans toutes les cereaIes? Citez les nutriments particuli~rement rares chez Ie mail.15 Quels sont lei faeteurs eontribuant /I. la mauvaise nutrition panoia aaaoeiee /I. une alimentation /I. base de msis? FreeillH la quantiU de msil neeessaire /I. un \"consommateur type\" pour aatiafaire sel besoins energj\\tiquel quotidians.Qualite du ma\"is et nutrition L 'huile contenue dans Ie germe peut provoquer Ie rancissement des produits entreposes pour une longue duree.Un regime alimentaire, puisant la majeure partie de son energie du mals, peut 6tre deficient en vitamines et en certains acides amines (constituants des proteines). Pour que ce regime soit equilibre, il importe de consommer des aliments venant enrichir la contribution proteique et vitaminique du mals.Qualite des proteinea. Le malS et les autres cereales sont en general pauvres en dew< aeides amines essentiels, it savoir la lysine et Ie tryptophane. Ces acides amines sont presents en plus grande quantite dans Ie germe du grain de malS que dans son endosperme (tableau 7). Le rapport leucineli80leucine est plus faible dans Ie germe, lui conferant ainsi une valeur biologique plus elevee.Les preparations cuIinaires integran t Ie germe de malS possedent d~s lors une meilleure composition protei que, bien que leur capacite d'entreposage soit limitee a cause des huiles contenues dans Ie germe.Chez les Iegumineuses, les proteines sont plus riches en lysine et en tryptophane, mais manquent 80uvent de methionine et de cystine. Lemail p08sMe ees deux acides amines en quantite suffisante. Le mais consomme avec des legumineuses permet d'ameliorer la qualite protei que du repas.On peut egalement ameliorer la qualite proteique des regimes II base de malS en cultivant des varietes dotees de proteines de qualite (QPM). Ces varietes contiennent presque deux fois plus de lysine et de tryptophane que Ie mals normal, rnais la merne quantite totale de proteines. Ces varietes QPM ne renferment que tres peu de zeine, la principale proteine de reserve du mals, alors qu'elles sont riches en d'autres proteines. En general, les proteines Butres que la zeine se caracterisent par une composition plus complete en aeides amines. La zeine, quant Ii elle, est particulierement carencee en lysine et en tryptophane. I.e rapport entre les endospermes yjtreux et farineux (les types vitreux ont une den site superieure).La composition relative de I'amidon, des proteines, de I'huile et de I' eau (avec un poids specifique respectif de 1,5; 1,1; 0,9 et 1,0).La teneur en eau (la den site est directement Iiee A la teneur hydrique). "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2631974444.json b/main/part_2/2631974444.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2238066d774bd8703c205810582920395eb5f0e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2631974444.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7b0d0334f1031cafeb8c34896cdee28d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f0b5be62-4d24-4017-8499-5062e2f01cda/retrieve","id":"-1821875086"},"keywords":["Farmers","Agriculture","Climate change","Participatory knowledge"],"sieverID":"c7c4b348-bffc-486a-9dc9-19d1f42fe6f6","content":"The CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), in common with other CGIAR research programs, understands that farmers are at the centre of agricultural innovation and adaptation. This publication describes some of the many ways in which CCAFS works with farmers and farmers' organizations to solve problems generated by climate change. Recognizing the importance of participatory knowledge systems involving farmers, scientists, and other stakeholders in responding effectively to climate change, this document seeks to provide an overview of the many ways CCAFS collaborations with farming communities work in practiceand how this can serve as a springboard for more effective dialogue and planning, leading ultimately to better outcomes for farming in a climate-constrained world.The actions, values and knowledge of farmers are pivotal to achieving future food and nutrition security under climate change. This publication describes some of the many ways in which the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) works with farmers and farmers' organizations to solve problems generated by climate change.Etrida Luhanga, a smallholder from Malawi, had the final word at the 2013 'Dublin Conference on Hunger -Nutrition -Climate Justice' on behalf of fellow farmers, pastoralists, and fishers. Addressing the assembled policy-makers, she said: \"In the past, you've been talking to people who do not know anything about farming…But we are the owners of this work.\"Rural households have indeed managed the vagaries of local climates and environments for millennia. CCAFS, in common with other CGIAR research programs, understands that farmers are at the centre of agricultural innovation and adaptation. Climate change is altering agricultural conditions at an alarming rate, and in times of such rapid change, farmer-led research to reduce exposure to climate risks provides an alternative to approaches driven entirely by 'experts'.On the other hand, within the next century climate change may push many habitats and farming systems outside all previous experience. Thus science has a valuable role to play in helping farmers plan for completely new conditions.Participatory knowledge systems involving farmers, scientists, and other stakeholders, will be key to responding effectively to climate change. These systems may cost more but they can trigger and disseminate innovation faster and more widely and equitably than either farmers or scientists alone. Science and farming need to work together.In this document we give practical examples of the work of CCAFS with farmers. We hope it will give farmers and our other partners a good overview of the many ways our collaborations with farming communities work in practiceand how this can serve as a springboard for more effective dialogue and planning, leading ultimately to better outcomes for farming in a climate-constrained world.Even without the rising uncertainties and risks of which climate change is the progenitor worldwide, farmers in the poor South would face a daunting challenge over the next few decades, struggling by some estimates to produce as much as 70 percent more to feed a growing population.Farming systems all over the developing world face being destabilized in even the most conservative climate scenarios examined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Agriculture will have to contend with substantially modified environments, rising global temperatures, unpredictable seasons, altered precipitation patterns, and rising sea levels that threaten, especially, coastal communitiesall spawning additional stressors for farmers.Put at its simplest, most farmers in most countries rely on rain-fed agriculture; this makes them very vulnerable to topsy-turvy seasons and the vagaries of precipitation under climate change. As yields decline, so does the chance of generating a surplus that can be invested in the technologies and practices that might helplike rotating crops, or mixing familiar varieties with new drought-resistant ones, for example, or integrating crops and livestock.A key objective for CCAFS, therefore, is to help reinforce the ability of farmers and fishing communities to adaptresearching and deploying a wide range of strategies, from product diversification to better institutions and policies. It will be important to do this without disrupting fragile livelihoods; holistic approaches are needed that consider how technical and policy sectors interact.At the outset, it's clear that there are significant gaps in people's knowledge about what adaptation options are even available, what a cost-benefit calculation for them might look like, when and where they should be deployed, and what learning processes can support widespread change amid an uncertain and risk-laden future.The main objectives of CCAFS research are threefold. The first action we need to take to adapt farming systems to the world of 2030 is to close the yield gap -the difference between what farmers actually harvest and what they could get under more favourable or better-managed conditionsby effectively using current technologies, practices, and policies. We model different approaches through field-based research to test their effectiveness in relation to expected future climatic conditions.Secondly, we can develop breeding strategies for the improvement of crops and make varieties available that can stand up to the many challenges of the future climate.And thirdly we will enable policies and institutions, from the farm to national level, to promote change. We investigate the social, institutional, and policy environments required for adaptation options to bear fruit, so that together they can be used to establish effective agricultural adaptation plans and strategies.All over the world it is possible to take 3 categories of rural people and observe a high degree of overlap between them: the poor, the food-insecure, and smallholders. Belonging to of one of these groups is a good predictor of membership of at least one of the other two.Almost all African farms are small-scale; a majority of the population of sub-Saharan Africa rely on subsistence agriculture for survival; typically, the people who till, sow, hoe and pick are women, without easy access to machine tools, fertilizer, pesticides or artificial irrigation.In the CCAFS East Africa region (Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda) agricultural systems are highly vulnerable to frequent, severe climate shocks like drought, floods and extreme temperatures. The West Africa region (Burkina Faso, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Mali, Niger, Senegal) encompasses a diverse agricultural base spread over a wide range of agro-ecological zones, yet with significant potential for improved productivity.Latin American countries are highly vulnerable to climate change due to their socioeconomic, geographic and institutional characters. Agriculture, in particular, is highly sensitive to climate variations. The CCAFS region (Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru) has also faced human and biodiversity losses from extreme-weather events. Most of the impacts of climate variability have been in Central America and along the Andes mountain range.Southeast Asia (Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam), the newest region in the CCAFS system, is also exposed to climate impacts because of the interaction between disasters and population density. It contains important biodiversity -the world's second largest rainforest after the Amazonand the huge rice bowls of the Mekong and Red River deltas, themselves at risk from extreme weather and rising sealevels.South Asia overall is home to nearly a quarter of the world's population, yet it has only 2.4 percent of global land surface area, making it the most densely populated region of the world. It has achieved tremendous progress in last four decades in food, yet a quarter of the world's hungry and 40 percent of malnourished women and children live there. The region is prone to climate impacts like floods, droughts, cyclones and heatwavesall projected to intensify. CCAFS works in Bangladesh, India and Nepal.CCAFS has been developing baseline surveys and 'participatory diagnosis' to determine farmers' household and agronomic starting pointsfiguring out exactly where you are today helps to plot a course toward a better future.Through its partners and starting in 2010, CCAFS engaged in 15 baseline surveys at household, village, and organizational levels in locations across 3 target regions in East and West Africa and South Asia. The challenge was to design new tools for data collection of the highest standard, to allow for comparisons to be made between sites on different continents but facing many of the same issues.The surveys were designed to develop simple indicators of food security, assets, crop diversity, farming practices and gender indicators, for which changes can be evaluated over time. They were conducted in (alphabetically) Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, Niger, Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda. The exercise covered just over 4000 households in 206 villages.The plan is to revisit these households and villages, where many partners have already been working, after 5 years and again in 10 to monitor progress. The goalthrough participatory diagnosisis to assess what changes have occurred and whether they are helping households adapt to and mitigate climate change.This first set of 15 sites may be added to as new opportunities emerge; some may receive more attention than others; some sites may even phase out. Additional sites and partners will be added as research priorities for CCAFS are developed with partners. Work is also underway to define locations for 'climate analogues', where the climate projected for 2030 at one geographical location matches the climate now at another. This approach enables farmers to visualize what their future might look like and what options they need to consider.Land use is another important issue for which a baseline needs to be drawn. CCAFS and its local partners have identified blocks of 10 square kilometres where researchers can integrate socioeconomic and land-use factors into a 'big picture', also including, for example, carbon measurements from satellite images. In some African countries, blocks 30 kilometres square were chosen because of lower population densities, ensuring the criteria for household sampling were met everywhere.The first baseline indicator is food security. For years when there was neither drought nor exceptional rainfall, households were asked, firstly, whether the food they accessed month by month came from their own supplies or other sources, and, secondly, which months of a typical year they struggled to feed their families, from whatever source.The baseline surveys revealed the highest incidence of food insecurity in Ethiopia, Ghana and Tanzania. Over half of the Ethiopian households surveyed experienced more than 6 'hunger months' a year; 60 percent of Tanzanian households reported more than 5 in an average year; 47% percent of Ghanaian households surveyed reported more than 5. In Kenya, however, it is rare to find households that experience more than 4 hunger months.Understanding how climate variability affects rural men and women in different regions is difficult. Men, women, and children are all placed differently to respond to climate change.The CCAFS baseline surveys picked out female-headed households, allowing patterns to be discerned in areas where there were significant proportions of such households. We also itemized agricultural labour inputs by gender, and highlighted some of the differences in levels of access to climate-related information reported by men and women.Farm labour tends to be differentiated by gender. Women had no power over cash crops such as rice in the Bangladesh sites, for example, because their domain is the kitchen garden; in Uganda, women could not make decisions about the precious coffee and banana crops (see below) because of insecure land tenure. In Ghana, women had more say over improved crop varieties, but less with staples such as cereals and legumes.'Participatory video' can give women a voice to share perceptions and knowledge of the climate issue with a larger, online audience. The song above features in a 2012 CCAFS-funded participatory video directed by 12 women on the Thadhi Jhijha village development committee (VDC), in southern Nepal's Dhanusha district. They were given 3 days' training in production techniques and spoke (and sang) about how climate has affected their livelihoods.Like many of the village's men, Dhanmanti Pradhan's husband works abroad and she's left to cultivate their fields alone with her children and hired labour when she can afford it. The climate impact this year, bedevilling the entire area's agricultural effort, is drought.\"In my childhood there was a lot of rain,\" she recalls, standing in the middle of one of her parched paddy fields. \"Now we irrigate using boreholes. This is winter time. But look at how strong the sun is, like summer.\"The 2012 droughtwhich the Thadhi Jhijha women contrast to the stormy, rainy weather of the previous yearis having other, more insidious effects than just the withering of various vegetables crops they need to celebrate Baisakh, the Nepalese New Year. Drought is conducive to pests.\"Earlier when there was rain we didn't have to use as much pesticide as we do now,\" says Dhanmanti. \"It is not good. It affects our health badly.\"The women must pay for water from privately owned boreholes: the rupee equivalent of up to 4 US dollars an hour, further sapping families' reserves for things like school fees. Says Dhanmanti: \"We only water plants every 15-20 days. Look how many have died.\"Her VDC colleague Sabitri Sah, a mother of three, always liked to put on a good spread of vegetable dishes for Baisakh (April-May), using plants like mooli (radish) and bantha (eggplant).\"Toor lentils are OK with less rain,\" she says, \"but everything else has been affected. The lack of rain has caused many people's paddies to go bad, and the potatoes didn't germinate in the ground. Now I live from selling buffalo milk.\"The Dhanusha participatory video project was implemented by the Nepal Forum of Environmental Journalists (NEFEJ) and the country office of the International Water Management Institute (IWMI).The After a site is selected, a steering group of community members and researchers identify climatesmart options in a fully participatory process. These might include climate-smart technologies, climate information services, local development and adaptation plans or supportive institutions.In Kenya's Lower Nyando valley, farmers are discovering the value of 'agroforestry'maize, sorghum and other crops sown between rows of trees that stabilize and enrich the soil. The demand for trees has led to nurseries springing up to supply seedlings, and these are becoming an important source of income, particularly for women, who own more than half the nurseries now thriving in Lower Nyando. Farmers have been encouraged to incorporate poultry, sheep and goats into their farms, generating additional income and food.Other activities focus on the management of natural resources. In Bihar state in northern India, where soils are prone to water-logging, new drainage techniques get rid of floodwater more rapidly and recharge aquifers at the same time. In dryer villages in India and Kenya, rainwater harvesting is important. More effective management of soil carbon, precise application of fertilizers, and energyefficient machinery all play a part.In addition to farm practices, farmers in climate-smart villages are also testing climate-smart services such as tailored weather-forecasts to plan planting and harvesting. These may come by SMS, and mobile phones are also being used to enable farmers to buy insurance cover against extreme weather.Another project that comes under the general heading of 'site-level participatory action research' is underway in Uganda, which in 2008 was the second-largest banana producer and the eleventh-largest coffee producer in the world. However, with a growing population farmers are increasingly short of spaceboth crops tend to grow at around the same altitude, from 800 to 2300 metres.The old colonial-era systemof separate cropping areas for coffee and bananasis still in use today, for lack of an obviously better option. But new research by the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture in Kampala and other CGIAR centres shows how growing bananas and coffee together leaves yields virtually unaffected but greatly increases the value of a single plot of land.Including bananas in the coffee system also alleviates risk for the farmer. If one crop fails they can still harvest the other. Ugandan farmers say shade from bananas also decreases coffee's susceptibility to drought and extreme weather. The residue from the trees provides mulch which would otherwise cost time and money to acquire, and they say bananas also motivate them to manage coffee better during the early unproductive years, because bananas produce even when coffee is not. This is especially true for women, who often do not see the proceeds from coffee sales but can use the banana harvest for home consumption.There are trade-offs, of course. 'Intercropping' places a greater burden on the soil and the system may require larger inputs of labour and capital at the outset. More work needs to be carried out to identify constraints and develop ways of addressing them. Farms of the Future will improve understanding of local practices and tools. Once refined, the methodology will be global enough to be implemented anywhere, giving scientists the ability to testand hopefully validatetheir models against real-world assessments.Down the ages, farmers have used traditional knowledge and coping strategies to adapt to changes in the weather and climate. They can predict the arrival of the rainy season by a change in wind patterns, for example. However, climate variability has now intensified to the point where they struggle to keep up.Agricultural research, extension systems, and NGOs are all affected by climate uncertainty because it limits the back-up they can offer; it has a negative impact on providers of credit and markets.Climate information (or 'climate services'), on the other hand, reduce uncertainty and can help farmers make better use of seeds and new technologies; they enable better decision-making, especially when reinforced with communications and training. With pilot projects in several African countries, CCAFS is tapping farmers' memories of rainy seasons, dry spells and planting dates. This helps researchers map the probable future and provide better seasonal forecasts.But to be effective, climate services rely on data tailored to farmers' needs, and under-resourced national meteorological services need support to supply information applicable to large areas.Mobile phones and radio have been used to convey weather information to a very large audience, even if personal interactions remain probably the most effective way of communicating complex messages about climate. CCAFS is building connections between national meteorological services and local organizations that have access to farmers and good information-technology skills.In Senegal, CCAFS and its local partners are developing new ways of reducing the risks farmers face.Farmers have been involved every step of the way, helping meteorologists and other specialists package information useful to them.\"Our biggest challenge was explaining [the concept of] probability to farmers, and also how to help them interpret the forecasts into actionfor example, when to plant,\" according to Ousmane Ndiaye, Head of Climate and Society with the Senegal National Meteorological Agency, interviewed about the CCAFS work in Kaffrine, on the northern Gambia border.But he added: \"The farmers were very keen and enthusiastic. And after the training they shared the information…and we felt we were filling an actual gap that exists. We built trust by trying to connect our climate information to things that are well-known to farmers.\"In East Africain the districts of Lushoto in Tanzania and Rakai and Hoima in Uganda -CCAFS partners include the Sokoine University of Agriculture and the Tanzania Meteorological Agency, and the National Agricultural Research Organization and Makerere University in Uganda.CCAFS researched the integration of indigenous knowledge with scientific weather forecasting and early-warning systems to sharpen farmers' and policy-makers' decision-making. In Lushoto, seasonal drought occurred most often compared to other extremes. Farmers in Rakai and Hoima districts planted early-maturing crops such as beans and sweet potatoes and drought-tolerant varieties of cassava.Local communities identified a 'good' season by watching for signs from birds, insects and animals, plants, the moon, winds and air temperature, and making decisions such as field preparation, dry planting, purchasing seed, and deciding on types of crop. The goal now is to evaluate the scientific basis of this traditional knowledge and link it to forecasts to reach a consensus.ICT and 'index-based' insurance: the example of India CCAFS has been working with farmers in India to maximize the benefit they can derive from information and communication technology (ICT) -especially 'advisories' about crop markets and weather via SMS, and index-based insurance schemes. Our researchers have also been looking at ways farming communities can record crop losses using modern ICT.India's agriculture depends heavily on the annual monsoon, which has become increasingly uncertain in onset and intensity. Unpredictable monsoons can account for half or more of the fluctuations in the country's harvests. Under these conditions, index-based insurance against weather shocks buffers farmers from losses. It uses a simple, measurable weather index such as rainfall to determine payouts, which can be made more quickly and with less fuss than conventional insurance.India has seen the widespread adoption of index-based insurance schemes, with the private sector playing a leading part in devising affordable policies for smallholders that are reliable, transparent, fast and less susceptible to fraud.Insurance companies don't need to visit the policyholder to assess damage and arbitrate claims. If recorded rainfall is below an agreed threshold, the insurance pays out automatically. Faster payouts mean farmers don't have to sell their assets to survive, and the need for emergency food aid is reduced.In many Indian states, public and private programmes now offer index-based insurance contracts for a variety of crops, providing cover against excessive rainfall or drought, temperature extremes and high winds. The index is based on measurements taken at weather stations around the country. By 2012, up to 12 million farmers growing 40 different crops over 15 million hectares were insured against weather losses.To achieve its full potential, index-based weather insurance needs to reach a much higher proportion of India's 1.2 billion people, 60 percent of whom dependdirectly or indirectlyon agriculture. To help meet that goal, CCAFS is investigating the behavioural and economic constraints that limit uptake by smallholder farmers.We are also working with the Agricultural Insurance Company of India to design schemes better suited to farmers' needs. This means, for example, ensuring payments match losses. CCAFS researchers are combining crop models with climate data to identify payment-triggers for various crops.Finally, through climate-smart villages, CCAFS is working with farmers to test tools and technologies such as water management and soil conservation. When combined with insurance, these can produce long-term benefits for farmers and help them become more resilient.In Bihar, for example, the 2012 monsoon was late, leading to delayed planting and losses in the rice crop. But in the Vaishali climate-smart villages, where more than 200 farmers had crop insurance, they got their first payment soon after the rains failed, enabling them to quickly invest in new seeds and re-plant.There are also synergies between insurance and credit. With insurance, farmers may be happier to borrow and banks more willing to lend, enabling farmers to invest in new technology.Agriculture is sometimes considered to be 'climate-smart' when it contributes to food security, adaptation and mitigation in a sustainable way. That may simply be through an otherwise disparate collection of practices, like water management or being more strategic about grazing.But now CCAFS and experts at Bioversity Internationalwho research the role of agriculture and forest biodiversity in a nutritious, resilient and adaptable futureare evolving a broader concept of climate-smart agriculture; one that not only stays within the limits of ecological systems but actually enhances them. Biodiversity gives farmers options, helping them minimize the risks associated with climate change.This workwhich includes local vulnerability, adaptation planning and seed systemscontributes to CCAFS programs and the CGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems. Bioversity International's 'Seeds for Needs' projects, for example, are based on the premise that with an array of different crops, farmers are more likely to cope with unpredictable weather.The program introduces farmers to different crop varieties and strengthens their seed systems so they can move with the climate. For example, wheat is particularly sensitive to heat and dries out quickly when it flowers; if farmers plant different varieties that flower at different times, they are less likely to suffer losses from sudden hot weather.\"It is definitely getting hotter. This has been the situation for the last five years,\" says Mamta Kumari, a farmer and a member of Bhatadasi Ladies' Group, in Bihar, India. \"But when we talk about the weather now, both summers and winters are getting extreme.\"One answer is to take varieties from other locations that are likely to thrive in the prevailing conditions. Jacob van Etten, a Senior Scientist with Biodiversity International, explains the process: \"We make a shortlist of varieties that we think are going to do well. Then we make a smaller set for farmers so they can get access to diversity, do some systematic observation, collect the information\" and share it.Mamta Kumari was pleased with the results: \"They [Biodiversity] helped select the varieties of wheat to grow this year and last year also. The trial was a big hit. Farmers came from far-off places to see this.\"In Papua New Guinea, another Seeds for Needs country, together with local implementing partners, the National Agricultural Research Institute (NARI), the program is identifying models for taro and sweet potato for current and future climatic conditions. The project is also expected to develop \"an improved seed multiplication and delivery system, leading to improved genetic production potential of staple crops in Papua New Guinea,\" according to NARI.Seeds for Needs started in Ethopia in 2009 with barley and wheat; as well as in India and Papua New Guinea, it also works on bean varieties in Honduras, Rwanda and Uganda; and on sorghum, pigeon pea and cowpea beans in Kenya and Tanzania. Additional projects in Cambodia and Laos are expected to start in 2014.In India, the CCAFS site in the Indo-Gangetic plains lies in an agriculturally vibrant region playing a vital role in the food security of the country. Since the mid-1960s, increases in agricultural productivity, rapid industrial growth and expansion of the informal rural economy have quadrupled per capita GDP and significantly reduced poverty.But now a host of factors threaten future progress: soaring food and fuel prices, volatile markets, the global economic downturn, depletion of water resources, diversion of human capital from agriculture, soil degradation, indiscriminate use of chemical inputs, shrinking farm sizes, and the overarching effects of the climate change that is projected to lead to uncertain monsoons and more frequent weather-extremes.Significant efforts are being made through various institutions on the development and dissemination of new technologies, including climate-smart practices, but large-scale adoption is sluggish. Scalingup climate-smart agricultural systems and other knowledge-intense technologies and practices has turned out to be more difficult than were 'green revolution' methods like new seeds, fertilizers and irrigation.One major bottleneck centres on the increasing average age of farmers, lingering traditional mindsets, and the loss of young people who move out of farming. Discussing with communities ways to break the impasse, the Mexico-based International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (known by its Spanish acronym, CIMMYT) decided to undertake technology development with young farmers in the belief that engaging them in a community-based approach will facilitate adaptation and adoption of new technologies.CIMMYT also recognised the advantage of bringing young farmers together to influence policymakers to support the promotion of technologies, targeting not only adaptation and mitigation but also farm profitability and generating alternate employment for rural youth through technologyled business opportunities. The other benefit was to evolve institutional mechanisms for buying and sharing assets such as expensive farm machinery, for real-time decision-making, and for using resources more effectively at community-level.CCAFS decided to interact with a group of young farmers from Taraori village, in the Karnal district of India's Haryana state. The response was overwhelming: farmer groups showed a keen interest in new-generation technologies to help with problems like: sowing rice with less labour; surface levelling to save irrigation water; residue management for more healthy soil; eliminating burning and tillage to save fuel, energy and water; more efficient use of nutrients; and general adaptation to climatic risks.The enthusiasm was so great that a group of 20 young people formed the 'Society for Conservation of Natural Resources and Empowering Rural Youth'. A community-based movement led by young farmers was born. Now more than 4000 people including senior policy-makers have visited these innovative farmers to learn more about resource-efficient, climate-smart and profitable technologies.As farmers' participation in technology and adaptation is critical, a new research platform was established with CCAFS at this village cluster to build awareness of different stakeholders including farmers, extension agents, students, scientists and policy-planners. Through capacity-building, different climate-smart technologies were demonstrated to large number of farmers in the CCAFS cluster as well as farmers and extension agents in other areas.The new society has also been publicizing the technologies through print and electronic media, including national newspapers and television and international conferences. The chief minister of Haryana announced incentives for community-based climate-smart and resource-efficient technologies -primarily conservation agriculture and 'smart' mechanization.This became a model for rural youth and communities, with 5 more young-farmer cooperatives in the clusters of CCAFS climate-smart village.Agriculture contributes as much as 24 percent of man-made emissions of GHG globally and is an important driver of deforestation. Yet it also offers opportunities to mitigate climate change through, for example, enhancing soil carbon, planting trees, improving livestock management, and more efficient uses of nitrogen fertilizer and energy.What are the relationships between emissions reductions, food and energy security, climate change adaptation and other environmental goals? Which agricultural systems and geographical regions have the largest potential for mitigation? How can we create incentives for lower-emissions food systems around the world? How can GHG in smallholder systems be quantified? CCAFS research seeks to answer these and other questions.We use a variety of metricsmany of them highly innovativesuch as farm emissions measurement, systems analysis, remote sensing, modelling and socioeconomic analysis. We test practices such as agroforestry, efficient use of nitrogen fertilizer, alternate wetting and drying (AWD) of rice paddies, improved livestock management, minimum tillage and more.In a project called Standard Assessment of Mitigation Potential and Livelihoods in Smallholder Systems ('SAMPLES') that started in 2012, CCAFS researchers are using the irrigated area of Bulacan province in the Philippines to test new metrics for emissions, and comparing mitigation options in smallholder agriculture.The project promotes mitigation in smallholder agriculture by developing a protocol for modelling and field-testing mitigation options and building local capacity for analyzing data. The subsequent protocol will be a tool for scientists and decision-makers who want to analyze low-emissions agriculture in smallholder systems.Scientists associated with SAMPLES are also testing methods and collecting data in Kenya and Vietnam, where field sites cover a range of smallholder systems including rice, rice-wheat rotations, and mixed systems of maize, sugarcane, livestock and vegetables. The research will provide a full year of data on low-emissions strategies.The sites are also serving as a classroom for more than 20 research fellowsbuilding in-country capacity for implementing the strategies being tested.Rice farmers in Bulacan are even more concerned about water than they are about climate. Their irrigation reservoir has been steadily depleting for at least 30 years due to droughts and the demand from the capital, Manila; another issue is that Philippine law prioritizes domestic over agricultural use of water.CCAFS researchers and their partners have been testing an AWD solution. This allows paddies to dry until the water table is below the soil surface before irrigating again. Compared with maintaining paddies in a continuously flooded state, it can lower water use by 25 percent and reduce energy used for pumping.The assessment process demands accurate measurement of emissions reductions associated with AWDdifficult because methods for doing so in smallholder systems have not yet been well defined.Investment by the public sector in adaptation is rising but it will be largely the private sectorfrom small-scale farmers to multinational companiesthat will lead adaptation of global food systems to achieve food security under climate change. The important thing will be to identify areas where companies' vital interests in adaptation overlap with opportunities for building adaptive capacity among vulnerable agricultural communities.Of 72 companies surveyed by the UN in 2010, 86 percent reported that climate change adaptation presents new opportunities; other studies indicate a large variety of motives that encompass both exploitation of emerging opportunities and management of growing threats. Incentives for engaging in adaptation can be summarized as: gaining competitive advantage; 'climate-proofing' future business; social responsibility; and compliance with regulation.The development by seed companies of crop varieties that have strong defences again drought, flood, salinity and pests clearly brings down farmers' vulnerability to climate risks. But their success is highly dependent on local factors. Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa, for example, a project led by CIMMYT, is developing maize cultivars that produce up to 50 percent higher yields in drought conditions. It has released 105 drought-tolerant varieties and seed production has risen from 700 tonnes in 2009 to 30,000 tonnes in 2011-12 in 13 African countries.The Stress Tolerant Rice in Africa and South Asia project, led by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and AfricaRiceboth CGIAR affiliateshas, for 6 countries, developed 10 rice varieties that tolerate floods, droughts and increases in salinity. One has survived being completely submerged for nearly 3 weeks and is spreading across Bangladesh, India and Nepal, reaching nearly 4 million farmers in 2012.IRRI and AfricaRice share an extensive network of partners from public and private sectors, NGOs, seed companies and farmers' organizations, through which these new products can be disseminated.Index-based insurance (see above) is also used in the arid rangeland areas of northern Kenya. To help pastoralists cope with climate change, CGIAR's International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and partners launched the Index-Based Livestock Insurance (IBLI) product in the Marsabit district. The average client has about 50 cows, camels, goats or sheep, or a combination.Unlike weather-based insurance, IBLI is based on a vegetation index; some 3000 pastoralists have bought cover. ILRI provides technical support while the private sector builds relationships with pastoralists and tries to overcome the problems of remoteness with SMS transactions.The most visible impacts of these developments and others like them are on farmers' assets; their ability to expand adaptive capacity depends on whether they can afford the goods and services on offer, and whether companies can engage in outreach when transaction costs are high or communications poor. As climate change develops, more companies are likely to respond to risks and market opportunities alike, which may provide farmers and herders with more options.In Phu Tho, two hours from the Vietnamese capital, Hanoi, where the Red River Delta meets Vietnam's northern mountains, lies a small family farm which shared its experience of 'Vuon Ao Chuong' (VAC) agriculture with CCAFS researchers busy planning our expansion into Southeast Asia.The scene that met the researchers was a testament to the success of VAC (which translates as 'garden-pond-pen') agriculture in Vietnam: dozens of sows and piglets grunting happily in their pen; a fish pond with resident ducks flapping on the water; bamboo beehives scattered around the property; about 100 chickens; workers tending a rice paddy. At the back of the property, a small wood provided much-needed shade.All these uses of land were being managed in the intensive but sustainable VAC system, in which nutrients from the pond fertilize rice and maize, while livestock manure generates biogas for cooking. The farm produces enough rice to feed a family of six and generates steady income through the rest of its products, allowing the family to invest in education, materials, and possible new ventures.It's experience and local wisdom like this farm and hundreds of others like it that CCAFS will attempt to harness as it rolls out climate-smart villages across Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. Integrated and intensive systems like Vuon Ao Chuong already give farmers an edge in the race against climate change: they do not rely on a single crop; GHG are reduced thanks to nutrient cycling and the use of intensification rather than just expansion.There is concern that climate impacts such as rising sea-levels threaten to erode the region's agricultural land and contaminate supplies of fresh water for agricultural production in a region responsible for much of the world's rice. Combined with rising salinity, which damages fertility and stunts rice and other crops, researchers warn that the region's huge deltasthe Red River, Mekong and Chao Phrayaand the millions who live on them, are at risk. The villages to be located in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar and the Philippines will be \"learning laboratories where multiple partnersresearchers, government agencies, the private sector, farmer groups, civil society organizationscome together to trial integrated solutions to climate change,\" according to Bruce Campbell, who led a 'convergence meeting' in Bangkok in December to build a climate-smart road map with local CGIAR partners.The program will not be without its challenges. \"Do you know how difficult it is to ask farmers to change their crop?\" says Dr Leocadio Sebastian, CCAFS Regional Program Leader for Southeast Asia. \"It's like asking someone to change their career. It's not something they can do overnight.\" \"It will require change in attitudes and acquisition of new knowledge, skills and practices and links to new markets.\" Buy-in from local partners will be crucial to identify target villages and the climate challenges to be tackled in them. \"Local ownership is very important,\" Dr Sebastian adds. \"Local people need to be part of local solutions.\"CCAFS does more than just gather evidence of the effects of climate change and agriculture on each other; it also strives to ensure each realm is understood in the other, requiring constant effort to engage at all levels with national decision-makers. For example, the Coffee Under Pressure project with smallholder producers in Central America and Mexico has brought sophisticated modelling of climate impacts to the community in a context that is relevant and useful for farmers. 'Double-loop' learning is emerging as scientists react to the resulting demands for information.Recent studies show that climate change threatens coffee systems, with impacts on yields, quality, and pests, among others. These findings have been extensively covered in the media, and now a roundtable dialogue is planned in Nicaragua, new research is being funded, and the largest US coffee roasting company is considering investing in adaptation by smallholder farmers upstream in its supply chains.Social learning has become important to CCAFS under its mandate to rethink agriculture and food security in a warming world. Strategies for addressing climate change ultimately depend on local contexts, so it is critical to link knowledge with action and explore tools for local decision-making.We are trying to help policy-makers, development partners, researchers and farmers make choices with a greater understanding of the many factors involvedlocal conditions and knowledge, national policies and programmes, international development paradigms, and the increasingly diverse drivers of global change. To support this process, CCAFS research and the tools it produces have to be based on the needs and knowledge of local actors.The CCAFS 'Integration for Decision-Making' team are looking at how social learning might help, and we are interested in learning from innovative work across the CGIAR network; in the next few years, we will mainstream new ways of working in climate, agriculture and food security.But we need new models for scaling-up and changes in institutional culture to spread social learning through research and development. We also face methodological issues such as learning how to work with different social groups and power structures, and reconciling stakeholders' varying timescales.There is also plenty of evidence The idea is to involve farmers in evaluating varieties as 'citizen scientists'; each farmer grows a combination of 3 varieties drawn from a broader set of 10. The farmer then ranks them according to characteristics like vigour, yield and grain quality.Things are made as easy as possible for the farmers; then we, the researchers, use nifty statistical methods to combine the rankings and share the results with them. With this information, farmers can identify the best varieties for their conditions and preferences.Farmers become scientists, actively contributing to science with their time, effort and expertise. In India, around 800 farmers are now testing wheat varieties as citizen scientists.It was a lot of fun to visit the plots and talk with the farmers. Each had its own story: wheat growing in an orchard or next to a cooperative, women's groups getting involved, etc. One thing we wanted to test is whether this approach is more cost-effective and less complicated than the usual demonstration plots or participatory trials. In the new set-up, logistics are simpler because the seed comes to the farmer; the farmer doesn't need to go to the demonstration plot.As the plots are smaller (with only 3 varieties from 120 grams of seed), they are easier to accommodate. In extreme cases, you can always just \"pull out the radishes,\" as one farmer put it.Also, the varieties farmers are testing have become the new local favourite topic of conversation, as farmers feel they are fully involved in the scientific process. We are also starting to test if they can report their results using a mobile phone.An important aspect of this work is the collaboration with national and local organizations; the litmus test will be whether the approach is picked up by our partners after their first experience of it.In Vaishali, our partner organizations liked the approach a lot. They found it practical and clearly saw its value for getting varieties to farmers. They were, however, a bit worried about how scientific it really was. But I believe that after going through the whole cycle with them (including applying the statistical methods mentioned above), they will be more confident about the scientific value of the exercise, explains van Etten.And if the approach is successful, we would not only make the crop improvement process cheaper but also fasterimportant given the speed of climate change.The crowdsourcing approach could make it possible to scale-up this effort to even larger areasinvolving thousands of farmers, increasing productivity and decreasing climate risk. Encouraged by the experience in Vaishali, we'll soon be starting similar tests in East Africa and Central America.Climate change affects not just a few thousand farmers, pastoralists and fishers, but all of themhalf a billion people or more. CCAFS harbours ambitious targets for reaching large numbers of farmers in the regions where we work. With the collaboration of partners, some of this ambition is beginning to be realised.The local government of Maharashtra in India, for example, is looking to scale-up CCAFS's climatesmart villages to at least 1000 across the state, concentrated in the most disadvantaged and vulnerable areas. Almost 100,000 women and men farmers will be involved, with secure government funding to support their efforts to manage the growing climate risks they face.Working with farmers is critical to CCAFS in achieving its long-term goals for poverty reduction, better nutrition, environmental benefits and fair outcomes for women and men. CCAFS seeks to be as strategic as possible in its partnerships with farmers and farmers' organizations, and this means: Improving policy-makers' understanding of the issues.  Listening to farmers' priorities, ideas and proposals.  Building the capacity of farmers to deal with climate risks.  Enabling learning on climate change across farming communities.  Ensuring farmers can access and utilize knowledge. Empowering farmers to drive research and policy.  Amplifying farmers' voices in all policy arenas.The role of governments, NGOs, businesses and research agencies is to support the true \"owners of this work\", as Malawian smallholder Etrida Luhanga put it in Dublin, to provide the services, infrastructure and incentives that enable farmers to manage and build agriculture under climate change."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2633666859.json b/main/part_2/2633666859.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6da14303727a2b55903932f4327efc4af5062a23 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2633666859.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"904aa3851ab81182de542a2aa873f070","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3ea1639a-63f1-4ebf-9ae2-99b4f811a784/retrieve","id":"331062730"},"keywords":["Characterization","breeding objectives","indigenous sheep","South Wollo"],"sieverID":"3319face-8faf-400b-9ba8-518441ae0aba","content":"This study was aimed to get information on production system, breeding objective and physical characteristics of native sheep types in kalu Tehuledre and Dessie Zuria districts of South Wollo Zone under smallholders' management conditions. Survey was undertaken on 180 HHs selected randomly. Body measurements were taken from 276 sheep, male (81) and female (195) sheep. Dentition was used to estimate the age of the sheep. Data were gathered through semi-structured questionnaire, focus group discussions and field observations. Survey data were analyzed using (SPSS 20.0, 2011) and phenotypic characterization and body measurement data were analyzed using (SAS 9.2 2010). Source of cash income, saving value, meat for home consumption, skin, manure and wealth status were the major purpose of keeping sheep. The average sheep flock size owned per household of Dessie zurea was (9.7±0.6) and significantly (P<0.05) higher than Teuledre (7.5±0.6) and Kalu (6.2±0.3). Body conformation and growth rate were used for male selection while lambing interval, twinning ability, body conformation was the preferred traits for breeding ewe in all districts. The overall average age at first mating in males were (7.29±0.05) and female (8.42±0.14) months. Age at first lambing 13.1±0.09, Lambing interval, reproductive life span of ewe and liter size were 8.04 ±0.07 months, 10.5 ± 0.3 lambs and 1.22 ± 0.06 lambs, respectively. Major production constraints were disease, feed and water shortage in order of importance. The overall body hair coat colour pattern was recorded (68.8%, 19.2% and 12%) for Plain, patchy and spotted respectively. White (26.1%), red dominant (29.7%), black (9.4%), red with white (12.3%), white with black (1.8%) red brown (7.6 %)), creamy white (13%), were the common coat colour observed. District had affected live body weight and linear body measurement.Body weight of Teuledere sheep significantly (p<0.05) heavier than Kalu and Kalu heavier than Dessie zuria. Sex had also significant effect (p<0.05) and revealed an important source of variation on body weight, body length, ear length and heart girth and vii all body linear measurements, were not significant (p>0.05) .In most traits, males were heavier and longer than females (p<0.05). Age had significant effect (p<0.05) on body weight and linear body measurement. Body weight were highly significant (p<0.05) at all ages .Body weight was significantly (P<0.05) correlated with all continuous traits observed in this study. Based on the result it could be concluded that, the fixed effect, age, sex, districts and age with sex interaction were the most limiting factor and significant (p<0.001) effect on live body weight and linear body measurement and revealed an important source of variation . To recommend that, the reproductive performance of sheep in south wollo has been observed that have good reproductive potential. So we should exploit and use this reproductive potential properly with modern management system.This is to certify that this thesis entitled phenotypic characterization of indigenous sheep and farmers' breeding objectives in three selected districts of south Wollo Zone, Ethiopia, submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of M.Sc. in Animal Genetics and Breeding to the School of Graduate Studies, Bahir Dar University, through the Department of Animal production and Technology done by Moges Takele Teshale ID. No. BDU0602044PR is an authentic work carried out by him under my guidance. The matter embodied in this project work has not been submitted earlier for award of any degree or diploma to the best of my knowledge and belief. However, works of other researchers and authors that served as source of information were duly acknowledged. I would like to express my special and heartfelt gratitude to my major advisors, Dr.Yeshambel Mekuriaw and my co-advisor, Dr. Solomon Gizaw, for their unlimited and unreserved support to make this thesis work successful. Their inspiration and brotherly encouragement was critical for this thesis result. Their willingness to share knowledge and materials and their way of advice to produce competent citizen will never be forgotten.Similarly I would like to thank International livestock Research institute (ILRI) for funding this research work and education fee and Bahir Dar University College of agriculture and environmental science (CAES) and Animal production and Technology Department for unlimited support of equipment, advising from learning up to the success of this thesis.My thanks must also extended to the staffs of south wollo zone, Dessie zuria, Tehuledre and Kalu districts agricultural and Rural Development Department for their active involvement and facilitation of the data collection activities and staff deserve appreciation for providing relevant secondary information and taking part in this study.I am extremely thankful to all my family for their encouragement and financial support during my stay in the campus. Finally, nothing will be done, no success without blessing of God. The world total numbers of goats and sheep were 861.9 and 1078.2 million, respectively, i.e. there is about one goat to approximately 1.25 sheep in the world, FAOSTAT (2008).There are tremendous variations among the different parts of the world regarding the number of goats, its ratio to sheep and their percentages. Characterization of sheep resources is a prerequisite for their rational utilization. In developing regions, there exist types of farm animal species which own their distinct identity to a combination of traditional 'breeding objectives' and geographical and/or cultural separation by communities which own them (Rege, 2003). Knowledge of traditional animal breeding practices and breeding objectives is important to develop sustainable genetic improvement schemes under smallholder situations. Lack of such knowledge leads to the setting up of unrealistic breeding goals in the design of livestock genetic improvement programs and the consequence of which can put in danger the conservation of indigenous animal genetic resources (Zewdu Wuletaw et al., 2006).The current level of productivity of sheep is essential to meet the demands of the ever-increasing human population. On the other hand, by improving the productivity of sheep, export earnings as well as the income of the household will be improved. There are, however, a number of constraints that affect the productivity of sheep such as mortality, feed scarcity and inadequate indigenous breed utilizations to production.Ethiopia is home for 6 breed group, at least 9 breeds and 14 traditional sheep populations and has a large number of sheep estimated at 29.33 million, out of which about 72.77 percent are females, and about 27.23 percent are males from total number of sheep 99.78% are indigenous breeds (CSA, 2015). In Ethiopia sheep are the second largest number of livestock species after cattle. (CSA, 2012/13) also reported that the majority (99.8%) of sheep breeds in Ethiopia are indigenous. ( Solomon Gizaw et al., 2007) reported, these sheep population are found and distributed in different agro-ecological zones with different production systems of the country .Sheep production has great contribution for the country at large and for smallholder farmers in terms of fetching foreign currency, income, job opportunity, human nutrition, risk aversion, ecological roles, rural banking and social values. Sheep have a unique niche in smallholder agriculture from the fact that they require small investments; have shorter production cycles, faster growth rates and greater environmental adaptability as compared to large ruminants. They are important protein sources in the diets of the poor and help to provide extra income and support survival for many farmers in the tropics and sub-tropics (Markos Tibbo et al 2006;Notter 2012). Sheep play an important economic role and make a significant contribution to both domestic and export markets through provision of food (meat and milk) and non-food (manure, skin and wool) products .They also play a major role in the food security and social well-being of rural populations living under conditions of extreme poverty which is particularly the case for eastern parts of Ethiopia (Alvarez et al 2009;Gemeda Duguma et al 2010).The demand from both domestic and export markets for product from small ruminants, especially mutton, is increasing in Ethiopia (SPS-LMM, 2010). However, the productivity of indigenous sheep is currently too low to meet this demand (Ameha Sebsibe 2008). Attempts have been made to improve productivity of indigenous sheep through crossing with exotic breeds such as Corriedeale, Hampshire, Romney, Awassi and Dorper (Solomon Gizaw and Getachew Terefe, 2009). However, these programs have not been successful, probably because of a lack of understanding of the indigenous sheep, preferred breeding objectives of the farmers and absence of involvement of all stakeholders in the designing of breeding strategies (Markos Tibbo et al. 2006,Gemeda Duguma et al 2010). While previous studies in Ethiopia have characterized indigenous sheep breeds both phenotypically and genotypically with their breeding objectives and farmers' breeding practices, diversity of production systems and genetic resources is still not well-represented and it is demanding (Workneh Ayalew et al., 2004, Mengiste Taye, 2009, Shigdaf Mekuriaw, Getachew Terefe et al 2010;Getachew Terefe et al 2011;Zewdu Edea et al 2012). In particular, there is limited information on phenotypic characteristics, farmers' breeding practices, trait preferences, and selection criteria of breeding stock used by owners of sheep in eastern parts of the country where indigenous breeds have special merit in Middle Eastern export markets (SPS-LMM, 2010).Various scholars from different corners of the world have been advising that the performance of indigenous sheep could be improved through management and there is also potential for genetic improvement through selection (Zewdu Wuletaw et al., 2006).Selection of a particular sheep breed for further improvement requires information about phenotypic characteristics and desired traits for the objectives of sheep production by smallholder farmers.The current status of knowledge on characterization of farm animal genetic resources in Ethiopia shows that there is inadequate information on breed level characterization (both phenotypic and genotypic), farmers' breeding practices, and breeding objectives (Rege, 2003, Workneh Ayalew et al., 2004).South Wollo Zone has high potential of sheep population. However, the indigenous sheep breed available in the Zone is recently not phenotypicaly characterized; farmers' breeding practices are yet reported as to the level of my knowledge. Furthermore, breeding objective of indigenous sheep in the proposed study area is not reported/ documented. These information, however, are highly required for policy makers, sheep breeders and development practitioners working on sheep production improvement program in the area as a prerequisite for designing sustainable sheep genetic improvement programs and strategies for the future development of indigenous breeds. More specific the aim of the improvement schemes is to increase production, product quality, cost efficiency, maintain genetic diversity and support the conservation and use of specific breeds. Hence, this study is designed with the following objectives.The overall objective of this research is to describe indigenous sheep breed existing in South Wollo Zone of Amhara region in terms of morphology, farmers' breeding Records of domestication of sheep date back to as early as 7000 in near east. The home of wild sheep is the mountain ranges of central Asia, from where sheep spread westwards into Europe and eastwards into North America during the Pleistocene period (Ryder, 1983). Domesticated sheep belong to the species Ovis aries. Sheep are believed to have been among the first animals to be domesticated, preceded by the dog and goat.The domestication of both sheep and goats probably dates back to the pre-settled agricultural period. It is also believed that most domestication took place in western Asia where the majority of the present day small ruminant breeds likely originated.Sheep are extremely versatile and since domestication they have spread throughout the world (Devendra and McLeroy, 1982) and currently there are more than 850 distinct breeds of sheep scattered throughout the world (FAO, 2000;Rege, 2003).Ethiopia has a large number of sheep estimated (CSA 2010). Sheep types in Ethiopia are highly affiliated to specific ethnic communities. A number of traditional breeds are reared by and named after specific communities. As could be noted, the indigenous sheep breeds are usually named after specific ethnic groups (e.g. Afar,) or geographical locations (e.g. the Horro, Menz, farta). Similarly, the classification of these major types is largely based on morphological or physical characteristics. Most of the investigations done up to now have been carried out on research stations, on-farm performance studies are very few. This in turn affects the understanding of the factors which influence sheep production at the farm level and also the introduction of specific interventions by development organizations. According to (FAO, 2000), a production environment encompasses all input-output relationships, over time, at a particular location. The relationships will include biological, climatic, economic, social, cultural, and political factors, which combine to determine the productive potential of a particular livestock enterprise. Animal uses, genetic variance, and abundance of genetic diversity change across production systems. As different production systems evolve varying pressures are place dup on the existing breeds, (FAO, 2004). Marked differences between production systems, such as product needs and prices, disease occurrence, spread and control methods and climatic differences will often require, for each environment, the use of quite different genetic resources to realize sustained production of food and agriculture, (FAO, 2000).Sheep production in Ethiopia is generally of subsistence in nature. Sheep are reared in extensive systems with no or minimal inputs; they are kept virtually as scavengers, particularly in mixed crop-livestock systems (Solomon Gizaw et al., 2013). Extensive systems of production share common characteristics, such as small flock sizes, communally shared grazing, uncontrolled mating, absence of recording, low productivity per animal, relatively limited use of improved technology, and use of on-farm by-products rather than purchased inputs. Market-oriented or commercial production is almost non-existent.The major sheep production systems in Ethiopia include the traditional management system (the pastoral and agro-pastoral and mixed crop-livestock systems) and the government ranches, characterized by different production goals and priorities, management strategies and practices, and constraints, (Markos Tibbo, 2006). Generally, the mixed crop-livestock systems are the most densely populated and hold the largest number of ruminant livestock. In the mixed farming system of the highlands of Ethiopia sheep depend mostly on grazing fallow lands, waterlogged lands, natural pasture and crop residues usually with no extrasupplement and receive minimum health care.In the lowland part of the country small ruminant production is associated with the purely livestock based nomadic and transhumance pastoral production systems based largely on range, primarily using natural vegetation. The pastoral systems are found mainly in the medium-to-low potential areas where crop production is difficult due to low and erratic rainfall. In this system though there are cultivations in some areas, livestock production forms an integral part of the socio-cultural life for the vast and diverse human populations.Most of the livelihoods of the inhabitants depend on livestock products and live animals sales or exchange, (Coppock, 1994). Risk avoidance is an important integral part of the breeding objectives in those areas. People moves periodically with their livestock in search of feed and water for their animals. In the lowlands of Ethiopia, livestock is comprised of large sheep flocks, where only surplus are sold at local markets or trekked to major consumption centers.Extensive livestock keeping is the backbone of the economies of the lowlands, (EARO, 2000). The government ranch is accounted for very small proportion of sheep production system in Ethiopia. It was found in government sheep breeding, and multiplication centers, (Markos Tibbo, 2006). This include government owned ranches such as Horro Guguduru ranch, which was closed due to high sheep mortality, the Debre Berhane and Amed Guya ranch involved in the production and distribution of crossbred rams to the farmers.Regardless of the harsh environmental conditions, small ruminants are important in feeding the rapidly expanding population of the developing world (Markos Tibbo et al., 2006). In addition to their adaptation to the harsh environment, they require low initial capital and maintenance costs, are able to use marginal land and crop residues, produce milk and meat in readily usable quantities, and are easily cared by most family members. Small ruminants play an important role for sustainable rural livelihoods and the utilization of marginal ecological areas (Köhler-Rollefson, 2001;Thornton and Herrero, 2001). Small ruminants provide meat and milk to the smallholders and are considered as insurance mainly against cop failure, as saving, socio-cultural and ceremonial purpose (Kosgey et al., 2004;Markos Tibbo, 2006;Habtemariam et al., 2012).Hence, small ruminants are important to the livelihood of smallholder farmers and to the economy of the country. About 31%-38% and 21%-33% of the Ethiopian smallholder farmers own sheep and goat (Asfaw Negassa and Jabbar, 2008), The livestock sector contributes 30% to 35% of the Ethiopian agriculture GDP, 19% of the total GDP and more than 85% of farm cash income (Benin et al., 2002). Small ruminants account for about 40% of the cash income earned by farm households, 19% of the total value of subsistence food derived from all livestock production, and 25% of total domestic meat consumption (Adane Hirpa and Girma Abebe, 2008).Sheep contributes close to 30% of the total ruminant livestock meat output and 14% of the total domestic meat production, with live animal and chilled meat export surpluses (Workneh Ayalew et al., 2004). The sheep enterprise in the Ethiopian highland where crop and livestock production are integrated, is the most important form of investment and cash income and provides social security in bad crop years. Despite the economic importance of small ruminants to the farming household and overall economic development of a country, efforts to improve the productivity and production systems of small ruminants are lacking (MFED, 2010).Sheep production and productivity in Ethiopia is constrained by many factors such as scarcity of feed, lack of infrastructure, high mortality rates, inadequate veterinary coverage, poor quality products and low average reproductive rates (Ehui, 1999, Tsedeke Kocho;2010). However, high reproductive wastage is the major constraint of sheep productivity, which also greatly reduces selection possibilities; thus, improving the frequency of lambing and reducing mortality should be the emphasized schemes of sheep production. Sheep have higher survival rates under unfavoured conditions and are widely adapted to different agroclimates. They are kept by all ethnic groups and production systems. Importantly, because of their small body sizes, small ruminants have lower feed requirements that allow integration of them into different enterprises. Moreover, in addition to requiring a small initial investment, flock numbers can be restored more rapidly because of their fast reproductive rates, and they are also suitable for meeting subsistence needs (meat and milk) of the smallholders (FAO,1991) .Lack of adequate feed resources as the main constraint to animal production is more pronounced in the mixed crop-livestock systems, where most of the cultivated areas and high human population are located (Sisay Amare, 2006). The problem of good quality and quantity feeds observed in lowlands where pastureland seems relatively abundant. There is a great seasonal variation of quality and quantity of feed resources in most part of the country.According to (Alemayahu Mengistu, 1998), there is excessive supply of feed during the rainy season which is usually followed by a deficit in grazing in the following dry season. On the other hand, the allocation of more land for crop production resulted in availability of crop residues as alternative feed, particularly in the smallholder livestock production system.Although there is difference in utilization across months of the years, communal grazing lands are utilized throughout the year. Similarly many reports (Abule Ebro;2003;Tsedeke Kocho, 2007;Tesfaye Kebede, 2008) indicated that natural pasture is the main feed resource for small ruminants and cattle. The availability and quality of forages are not favorable and uniform in nutrient quality all year roundIn southern part of the country, although the degree of shortage varies within farming systems/agro-ecologies feed shortage is reported as a major constraint for small ruminant production, (Endeshaw Assefa,2007;Tsedeke Kocho,2007;Getahun Legesse,2008). Another serious constraint for small ruminant production in Ethiopia has been the high prevalence of diseases and parasites. This causes high mortality of lambs, diminishing the benefits of their high reproductive performance (Solomon Gizaw et al., 1995;Yohannes Gojjam et al., 1995;Solomon Abegaz and Gemeda Dugema , 2000;Markos Tibbo, 2006).Water shortage is also reported as limiting factor in most lowland areas to a limited extent in mid altitudes. In eastern, north-eastern and south-eastern part of the country there is critical shortage of water; however, small ruminants are somehow adapted to these agro-ecologies through their physiological adaptation mechanisms.Any successful livestock production program is a result of good reproductive performance of sheep. To obtain meat, milk and fiber the existence of birth and survival is necessity, (Tesfaye Getachew, 2008). The productivity of sheep mostly based on the reproductive performance of sheep. And reproductive performance depends on various factors including age at first lambing, litter size, lambing interval and the life time productivity of the ewe, the last one being related to longevity (Sulieman et al., 1990).In most traditional systems, first lambing occurs at 450-540 days when ewe weights are 80-85 percent of mature size (Wilson, 1986) Ibrahim (1998). Extended lambing intervals commonly arise from long post-partum anoestrus intervals, repeated cycles of service intervals without conception, embryo death or abortion (Gatenby, 1986;Ibrahim, 1998).In good management condition, adequate nutrition lambing interval can be possible to attain three lambing from indigenous sheep in two years (Sani and Tiwari, 1974).According to (Solomon Abegaz, 2007) in association with the above thought Gumuz breed had an average lambing interval of 6.64 ±1.13 months so the breed can produce three lambing in two years even under the traditional management system but the work of (Zewdu Edea, 2008) indicates that lambing interval of around 8.9 ± 2. 3.67 years for rams) was reported.The concept and structure of conventional livestock breeding objective was initially formalized by (Hazel, 1943) and it defines the traits of importance and the direction of genetic improvement; (Borg, 2004). Breeding objective is defined as the traits to be improved, the cost of production and the revenue from product sales related to a genetic change in each trait.Sustainable animal breeding strategies require a broad definition of breeding objectives that emphasize maintaining adaptation and biodiversity in addition to Profitability (Olesen et al.,2000;Neilsen et al.,2005Neilsen et al., ,2006)). Sölkner et al.(1998) and Kosgey et al. (2004) reported that production and consumption of milk from sheep is not common in mixed croplivestock system where income generation is considered as the primary objective of keeping sheep.Although the primary purposes differed between production systems, the use of indigenous sheep as multipurpose animals was common to all production systems. Multi-purpose sheep rearing is common in Ethiopia, (Getachew Terefe et al 2010;Solomon Gizaw et al 2010;Zewdu Edea et al 2012) and linked to the need to maximize output from an animal that can survive on a low input of resources (Jimmy et al 2010). Multiple functions are particularly important in low-to medium-input production environments, Zewdu Edea et al (2012).Given the breadth of purposes that farmers and pastoralists have for keeping sheep, much care is required in the choice of breeding objectives and breeding strategies as the function of the animals is closely linked to the traits desired by the producers (Jimmy et al 2010).Knowledge of reasons for keeping animals is a prerequisite for deriving operational breeding goals (Jaitner et al 2001). Milk production of sheep should always be considered in designing a breeding strategy for pastoral and agro-pastoral systems where sheep milk consumption is common and acceptable.Lack of proper recognition of the purpose of keeping animals by their owners has been amajor reason in the failure of past genetic improvement programs (Sölkner et al 1998).Farmers sell their sheep to anyone who pays an acceptable price and the buyers are mainly other farmers, traders and final consumers. Yearlings of both sexes are sold to market when farmers are in need of cash, Solomon Gizaw et al, (2012).Farmers market sheep and goats at farm gates or the nearest local/primary markets. Farmers use all markets found in their localities regardless of political boundaries and ethnic and cultural differences.Farmers sell their sheep mainly to traders, consumers and to a lesser extent to other farmers. Even though farmers sell their animals when financial problems force them to sell, they do prefer to sell their sheep during holidays and festive occasions( Tsedeke Kocho,2007). As indicated by farmers, sheep price is affected by season -holidays and festivals. It was reported that better price is fetched during Ethiopian New Year, Christmas, and Easter. Information on market price, supply, grades, and standards are not available to farmers. Formation of farmers' cooperatives and development of marketing facilities would enable farmers to get better prices for their animals According to (Ayele Solomon et al. 2003), the current knowledge on livestock market structure, performance and prices is poor and inadequate for designing policies and institutions to overcome perceived problems in the marketing systems of Ethiopia. Moreover, (Gede et al., 2005) from Indonesia reported that farmers possess minimal marketing information and usually complain about the prices they receive for their merchandise. (especially when animals are trekked or trucked through towns) and lack of efficient vaccination services for export animals as the major problems.For breeding (selection), feeding and health care and for market age determination knowing the body weight of a sheep is important. However, this fundamental knowledge is often unavailable for sheep in the small scale farming sector, due to unavailability of scales, (Zewdu Edea, 2008). According to Sisay Lemma (2002) Populations of livestock species in developing regions are traditionally recognized as distinct types by ethnic group or geographical locations, from where they often derive their names.Preliminary identification of breeds or populations involves phenotypic characterization of distinct populations using a combination of stratified and purposive sampling strategies.Qualitative and quantitative descriptions, including morphometric measurements of animals, are collected through farm level surveys to identify and describe the representative samples of animals from the targeted populations or breeds or breed groups. For this purpose, a comprehensive list of animal descriptors was developed by FAO (1986) and Workneh Ayalew and Rowlands (2004).Characterization is a vital tool in animal selection and breeding. However, lack of information on the genetic potential and diversity of sheep discourages attempt towards their exploitation and conservation for increased productivity, Buvanendran et al (1980).The term \"phenotypic characterization of AnGR\" is used to refer to the process of identifying distinct breed populations and describing their characteristics and those of their production environments, FAO (2010b).Characterization of indigenous breeds is a base for any breed or productivity improvement programs. Characterization should include physical description, reproduction and adaptations, uses, prevalent breeding system, population trends, predominant production system, description of environments in which it is predominantly found and an indication of performance levels (Workneh Ayalew et al., 2004). Standard phenotypic characterization of breeds/ SPCB/ is carried out based on morphological characters such as coat colour, horn, tails, body measurements and other specific and visible traits. The study was conducted in South Wollo Zone of three districts (Dessie Zuria, Kalu and Tehuledere) of Amhara National Regional State (ANRS). South Wollo Zone is home for Study sites were selected purposively based on the distribution of sheep population, Agro ecology and accessibility of sites and prior to sampling of the study Kebeles, valuable information was collected from the three districts of agriculture office. Discus about the objective of the work were held with districts livestock and veterinary experts, coordinators and head office. A rapid field visits were held to select the study Kebele. Based on this approach, three districts (Dessie zuria, Tehuledre and Kalu) were indentified. productive life), feed resources and feeding strategy, healthcare and common diseases, marketing system and production constraint were the major variables collected by the questionnaire.In addition, focus group discussion and key informant and village elder's interviews were The qualitative characteristics of 12 traits (sex, dentition, body hair coat colour pattern, body hair coat colour, hair type, horn presence, horn shape, horn orientation, ear orientation, facial (head) profile, wattles, ruff) FAO ( 2012 Indices were calculated for ranked variables purposes of keeping sheep in the study areas, class of sheep selling when cash is needed in study areas, feed resources in the study areas, criteria for trait preferences of sheep. In reference to its formula; Index = sum of (7 for rank 1 + 6 for rank 2 + 5 for rank 3+4 for rank 4 + 3 for rank 5 + 2for rank 6+1 for rank 7) given for an individual attribute divided by the sum of (7 for rank 1 + 6 for rank 2 + 5 for rank 3+4 for rank 4 + 3 for rank 5 + 2 for rank 6+1 for rank 7) for overall attributes (reasons).Data from the body weight, linear measurements and morphological observations for the phenotypic characterization was analyzed using statistical analysis system (SAS Version 9.2, 2010). Qualitative data from the observations were analyzed separately for both sexes for both agro ecologies/districts using frequency procedures. Chi-square test was employed to test for independence between the categorical variables.General Linear Model (GLM) was used to determine the effect of agro-ecology; sex ,age and the interaction effect of age with sex on quantitative trait measurements using (SAS, Version Flock structure of sheep is presented in Table (4.8) .The mean sheep flock size in Dessie zuria was higher and significant (p<0.05) than in Tehuledre and Kalu as showed in table (4.8). In Dessie zuria, breeding ewes accounted for the largest number (2.85± 0.18) followed by lambs less than 6 months old (2.57±0.1), female 6 month to 1 year (1.63±0.14), male 6 month to 1 year (1.13±0.12), breeding ram (0.87±0.12) and castrates (0.57±0.1). In Tehuledre as well, ram lambs less than 6 months old accounted for the largest number (2.2±0.16) followed by breeding ewes (1.92±0.11), female 6 month to 1 year (1.17±0.1), male 6 month to 1 year (1.03±0.01), breeding ram (0.63±0.1) and castrates (0.52±0.08).According to the survey result breeding ewes accounted for the largest number (2.27±0.1), in the Kalu followed by lambs less than 6 months old (1.82±0.13) male 6 month to 1 year old (0.75±0.1), female 6 month to 1 year (0.71±0.1), breeding ram (0.4±0.07) and castrates (0.28±0.06). There were sheep flock structure difference (p< 0.05) in breeding ewes, lambs less than 6 months , male 6 month to 1 year old ,female 6 month to 1 year , and no significance difference(p>0.05) in castrates and breeding ram among districts.The flock structure of breeding ewe and lamb was higher in all districts of the study area as compared to other age classes. This might be attributed to the prevalent practice of keeping ewe for breeding purpose which accounted the greater portion of the newly born animals while rams are either castrated or sold when they reach market age. The higher proportion of breeding ewe in the flock followed by suckling age group for both species was in agreement with those of Zewdu Edea et al (2008) Mixed crop and livestock production system is the dominant farming system across the study areas. Livestock production is an important component and well integrated with crop production. Livestock species kept by the farmers comprise cattle, sheep, goats, equines and chicken; while camel was common in lowland. The major farming activities in the Dessie zuria and Tehuledre study area were 100% follow mixed crop-livestock production system.Whereas the Kalu farmers practiced dominantly (93.3%) mixed crop and livestock farming followed by livestock rearing (6.7%).The major crops grown were cereals followed by pulses, vegetables, oilseeds and fruit crops.Main crop grown in the Dessie zuria were barley (55%), followed by wheat ( 22), maize(8%) field pea (9%) and linseed (6%) whereas wheat (40%), sorghum (32.5%) , maize (17.5%), and teff (10%) were the main crop grown in Tehuledre were sorghum (70%),wheat (15%) , teff (9%) and maize (6%) were mainly grown in the lowland. Farmers in the Kalu study area; nearly Borkena River practiced different irrigated crop farming for cash income such vegetable crops (sugarcane, tomato, onions, and potatoes) and cabbages were also reported to be used as additional source of income next to the sale of crop and livestock The meat demand grows much higher during major holidays/festivals. Thus, the density of producers who sale their sheep targeting the particular holidays/festivals was higher. This was to reap maximum benefit from sales. In Dessie zuria (55% and 45% ) farmers were sell their sheep in the farm and woreda market respectively and Tehuledre farmers (34%, 40%, 2008).The different feed resources reported in all across the studied areas were natural pasture, crop residue, hay, improved pasture and concentrate for both dry and wet season.The importance of natural pasture as major feed resource for sheep was also reported by (Solomon Abegaz, 2007). According to the respondents in the study area, natural pasture from the communal rangeland and grazing on fallow land ranked first in wet season were the main feed source for sheep in all agro-ecologies whereas crop residue was the first and main feed source of sheep for highland and lowland whereas hay was the first feed source in midland in dry season.Generally with the index of natural pasture (0.3), hay (0.25), concentrate (0.19), crop residue (0.12), improved pasture (0.11) were the main feed resource in wet season in highland whereas crop residue (0.31), hay (0.27), natural pasture (0.17), were the main feed resource in dry season. However, the major feed resource commonly used in midland were with the index of natural pasture (0. Some farmers in the Kalu with small flock size tie their sheep to a peg. According to the information of the members of the focus group, there is a difference in the productivity of sheep between those tied and housed freely, i.e., tied animals were healthier and productive than those housed freely. Farmers explained this as sheep housed freely lay one over each other because of their social behaviour and also in need of the warmth from huddling.Pregnant animals, young lambs and weak animals are the most vulnerable groups. In addition, animals may not get enough rest at night.Newborn lambs in the first week of birth are separated from their dam and cared for at home during the day when sheep are taken to grazing and before they get into their house upon their return in the afternoon. This is a common practice in other parts of the country (Abebe Mekoya, 1999;Mengistie Taye, 2008;Tesfaye Getachew, 2008). In all the study area, farmers use large baskets to keep newborn lambs and allow lambs to be kept dry, clean and warm. Suckling occurs in the morning before the dam leaves for grazing and when the flocks are back from grazing in the afternoon. Sheep production in the study areas was significantly benefited the owners or producers, they could be used for meat for home consumption, major source of cash income, for schooling fee, source of input purchase and other festivity activities. It was also used as insurance for crop production. Farmers reported that the major sheep production constraints were disease and severe feed and water shortage, drought and predator across the study areas. The pasture production potential was declining because of shrinkage of pastureland due to increasing of farmland, overstocking and deforestation. In Dessie zuria ditricts, feed shortage was severe following by sever disease and water shortage with the index of (0.33, 0.32 and 0.2)respectively. The feed shortage Problem was increased during dry season, from March to May; whereas in Teuledre disease (0.29), feed shortage (0.26) followed by (0.24) water shortage with the respective index.Drought occurrence and predator was also the other constraints that affected sheep production. In Kalu with respective index of disease (0.3) feed shortage (0.26), water shortage (0.23) were the major sheep production constraints. According to informants, and village elder, the diminishing in size of grazing land was related with the conversion of areas that used for grazing offered for different organizations, investors and settlers. Occurrence of outbreak disease following the mid ending rainy season was major constraints in the Kalu area. Effect of sex: Sex had show significant effect (p<0.05) between two sexes on body length, ear length, body weight and heart girth and revealed an important source of variation for body weight and other linear measurements. The other parameters were not shown significant difference (p>0.05) among two sexes as shown in table (4.22). The values of males were higher (p<0.05) than females in a traits of Heart girth (HG), body length (BL), body weight and ear length, and male were not significance difference (p>0.05) on a trait ,tail length (TL), height at wither (HW) and rump height (RH) Head length (HL). In this result, male were not found heavier (p>0.05) and longer (p>0.05) than female in across the study areas. Male sheep and sheep with dentition 4PPI had higher heart girth than female and lower dentition groups, respectively. The result is in agreement with literature (Mengistie et al., 2010;Tesfaye et al., 2009;Zewdu et al., 2009).Majority of traits, males were heavier and higher (p<0.05) than females in the same age group of female. Females were higher (p<0.05) than males in a trait at age (heart girth (0ppi), tail length (0ppi), ear length and rump width (1ppi, 2ppi, 4ppi Morning from, _____ to _____ hours. Afternoon from ______to_____ hours.Or from-----------to -----------2.2.4. Length of grazing time during dry season (in hours):Morning from, ______ to _____hours. Afternoon from, _____to ______hours . Or from-----------to ----------- What is your copping mechanism? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2651724705.json b/main/part_2/2651724705.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe858f52fd43512fa33bf58a9a036df82743c510 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2651724705.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"82ededecc7261b36a66ad9422ca65d7e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/290b414f-970b-45f0-8116-405a78358a00/retrieve","id":"-899964090"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b05782e4-d977-45f8-8bc7-24a4adb091ff","content":"CIAT encourages wide dissemination of its printed and electronic publications for maximum public benefit. Thus, in most cases colleagues working in research and development should feel free to use CIAT materials for noncommercial purposes. However, the Center prohibits modification of these materials, and we expect to receive due credit. Though CIAT prepares its publications with considerable care, the Center does not guarantee their accuracy and completeness.This document reports the Workshop on Repositioning Gender-Responsive Participatory Research in Times of Change, organized by the PRGA Program. The 3-day event brought together 46 professionals with recognized expertise to discuss the future and possibilities of genderresponsive participatory research (GRPR), including its integration into the new Mega-Programs of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).After opening remarks and an introductory exercise, the initial findings of the previously commissioned Demand Analysis Study-an exercise aimed at gathering firsthand information about workshop participants' and other stakeholders' expert experiences and considerations regarding the use and knowledge of GRPR-were presented and discussed. Besides suggestions on how to improve the study, participants discussed how positive actions and new opportunities could be reinforced and generated. Comments favored network and partnership issues, highlevel support and buy-in, knowledge-sharing and capacity-strengthening, and the active use of GRPR in the research cycle.A panel discussion on key issues in GRPR aimed at bringing in some key experiences of workshop participants. The panel and subsequent group discussions consisted of presentations on participatory plant breeding, participatory research and gender in the face of climate change, gender work at CIFOR, nutrition and gender, and participatory research, gender and market chains.The second day of the workshop began with the keynote address 'Perspectives on genderresponsive participatory action-research' by Aden Aw-Hassan. Using the successful example of participatory research applied in plant breeding, Aw-Hassan highlighted the potential for participatory research methods and also elaborated on the application of social and particularly gender analysis as essential for understanding the root causes of poverty.The presentation by Maya Rajasekharan, the CIAT Program Officer regarding the CGIAR Mega-Programs and the restructuring of the CGIAR led workshop participants to develop a set of key elements that should be considered in terms of outcomes and approaches for each Mega-Program. The results of this exercise were shared more widely with Mega-Program teams after the workshop.Day 2 also included a 'marketplace,' a space for the participants to share their experiences in applying and documenting their use of participatory research or gender analysis in their work. Parallel sessions included perspectives on GRPR from ASARECA, IICA, WOCAN, and EkoRural.The last day of the workshop began with an Open Space session, where participants had the opportunity to present an experience or discuss an issue of their choice. Those included: Gender mapping; gender, rice research and technology development; participatory varietal selection; gender research at IFPRI, ILRI and ICRISAT; and policy work supporting the inclusion of a gender perspective.Finally, the draft strategy outline and action plan were presented and discussed, and postworkshop steps were identified by the group. This included the suggestion to establish an Interim Committee to continue supporting the GRPR Strategy for the International Agricultural Research System.At the end of the workshop, participants had an 'After Action Review,' where most participants expressed their appreciation of the opportunity for active and meaningful discussions. An indepth participants' evaluation of the workshop was conducted via online survey after the workshop, which 38 participants completed. On a 10-point rating scale, participants rated their overall impression very positively between 8 and 10 and the achievement of workshop objectives at an average of 8. Among the sessions participants liked most were the panel discussions and the keynote. When asked for three action items as important next steps for repositioning GRPR, replies were given favoring active networking, communication and advocacy, capacitystrengthening, and fundraising.The workshop has been fully documented and shared through the workshop website at: http://www.prgaprogram.org/rptc/.The Workshop on Repositioning Gender-Responsive Participatory Research in Times of Change was held on June 16-18, 2010 in Cali, Colombia, at the headquarters of International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). The workshop brought together 46 (42 in CIAT + 4 virtual) professionals with recognized expertise in participatory research and gender analysis, drawn from CGIAR Centers, national agricultural research systems (NARS), subregional agricultural research organizations (SROs), NGOs and academia.Through 3 days of lively discussion, experience-sharing and collaboration, the participants generated important outputs to help redefine the future and possibilities of gender-responsive participatory research (GRPR), including its integration into the new Mega-Programs of the CGIAR. The discussions drew on contributions of invitees from the different centers, NARS and partner organizations, and the preliminary results of a pre-workshop demand analysis (Staiger et al., 2010).Participation in the workshop was organized by the Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis (PRGA Program). From 1997, the PRGA Program (a CGIAR Systemwide Program, SW) aimed to improve the competence of the CGIAR system and collaborating institutions in mainstreaming the use of participatory research and gender analysis for 12 years. Over time, it developed and gathered a substantial body of knowledge on both gender and participatory research at the level of farming communities, as well as at the level of the institutions and programs serving them.Obstacles and constraints to the institutionalization of gender-sensitive participatory approaches were identified by the SW-PRGA Program during its first phase (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002). While progress has been made in several CGIAR centers with which the Program worked, there is general consensus that much remains to be done within the CGIAR system and in partner organizations such as NARS and NGOs. In addition, some participatory and gender work has gone unrecognized, both within the centers and more broadly throughout the system.Workshop participants were invited because of their expertise in conducting participatory research with a gender-responsive/sensitive perspective. All selected participants were either specialists in gender and participation or practitioners of participatory approaches. These experts were drawn from among the researchers of CGIAR centers and NARS, SROs, NGOs and academia from different regions. Thus, the results from this workshop are considered akin to those of an expert consultation.A list of all workshop participants and their contact information is given in Annex 1 of this report. Also, a complete 'booklet,' containing pictures and bios of the 46 workshop participants, the facilitators and the PRGA Program logistics team can be found online and in materials distributed after the workshop (CD-ROM).The purpose of the workshop was 'to identify mechanisms that support gender-responsive participatory research by building on the experience of researchers and practitioners from the CGIAR centers, academia, NARS, NGOs and donor organizations.' The workshop also aimed to 'provide inputs on issues related to gender-responsive participatory research in the CGIAR and other partner organizations.'The main objective of the workshop was to 'identify practical ways to revitalize genderresponsive participatory research that meets the needs of women and men small-scale farmers.' Additionally, the workshop looked to 'explore the relevance of gender-responsive participatory research taking into account the results of the demand analysis conducted at the system level and also including other partner organizations' and contribute to 'design a strategy to support gender-responsive participatory research in the new CGIAR, including the context of the Mega-Programs.'It was expected that the workshop would generate:• A strategy and action plan for supporting gender-responsive participatory research • A mechanism of linking scientists and their partners in a community of practice to increase learning and feedback to upstream programs • An outline for the design of a proposal for leveraging the resources (human and financial) needed to implement the proposed action plan through 2014 • A report detailing the results of the demand analysis, the workshop process and the proposed strategy and action plan.A roadmap was designed for the 3-day workshop to illustrate the flow of the sessions, including some time each day to receive input and feedback, and other times dedicated to joint reflection: Day 1 included sessions that aimed at finding common ground and sharing relevant presentations to enrich the strategic reflections, bringing in the experiences of workshop participants on GRPR; Day 2 combined a strategicreflection exercise with a 'marketplace'; Day 3 was intended for making progress toward the strategy and action plan, but also offered new perspectives through an open-space session.The workshop was facilitated in turns by members of the CIAT Facilitating Impact Team (FIT), and with the permanent support of the workshop organizing team. Throughout the workshop, there were presentations, panels, discussions, group work and sharing of experiences, each with appointed reporters to facilitate feedback in plenary and the inclusion of the results into a strategy and this final report. Different interactive facilitation formats included a 'Marketplace,' an 'Open Space' session where participants could come up with issues for parallel sessions, and a 'Fishbowl' dynamic which allows lively plenary discussions.The PRGA Program was in charge of logistics and created an environment conducive to collaboration and the well-being of participants. At the start of each day there was a newsletter to outline the process and bring together highlights from the previous day. Two post-workshop press releases were issued and shared widely. Newsletters and press releases are presented in Annexes 9 and 10, and posted in the newsletters and press reports section of the workshop website.The workshop was opened with a welcoming inaugural speech from the Director General of the 'host' Center, CIAT, Ruben G. Echeverría. In his speech, Echeverría highlighted his expectation that the workshop outputs would include \"a clear way forward for future research activities of PRGA [Program] at CIAT,\" and to help \"clarify how the CGIAR can organize these [participatory and gender] activities.\" He noted that although CIAT was not leading any of the CGIAR's new Mega-Programs, it was involved in almost all of them, which would provide the Center with the opportunity to promote GRPR.John Dixon, chairman of the Program Advisory Committee (PAC) to the former Systemwide (SW) PRGA Program, then gave a brief history of the Systemwide Program emphasizing its role in participatory plant breeding, impact assessment, capacity-building, and its inclusive approach to partnerships (see CIAT, 2010). CIAT had recently acted as a case study for gender-mainstreaming, starting with a gender audit in 2008-09 (Aviles Irahola, 2008). He noted that the Systemwide Program was now closed, and thanked the Director General of CIAT for providing the Program with a home. Dixon went on to say that CIAT was looking to clarify the role of the CIAT-PRGA Program both within CIAT and Systemwide via the Mega-Programs.A short, 'homemade' video was then shown with comments from several participation and gender experts, including Jacqueline A. Ashby, CIP Researcher, Edith Hesse, head of Corporate Communications and Capacity Strengthening, CIAT and Alessandra Galié', ICARDA Research Fellow. Other considerations, including those of several women farmers from different regions, were also presented. The video and other taped testimonies of workshop participants are accessible on the workshop website. After the video, PRGA Program Coordinator, Patricia Biermayr-Jenzano presented the workshop objectives.This session aimed at introducing the participants and finding a space for them to share ideas, thematic work in areas of common interest, about workshop expectations and on issues related to GRPR.Participants divided into five sub-groups. They were first asked to introduce themselves to their respective group by sharing their names and affiliation, and then to share their expectations of the workshop. The expectations were sorted into categories by the facilitators, and posted for participants to be able to refer to them during the workshop (see Annex 2).During a second round, participants mixed into new groups and each group discussed the following questions: 'What have been our experiences using participatory research to address women farmers' needs and interests? What has worked and how can we build on our experiences?' These discussions helped set the common ground and vision of what needed to be accomplished during the workshop, some notes from some of these discussions are presented in Annex 3.A Demand Analysis Study commissioned by the PRGA Program was carried out by the CIAT Facilitating Impact Team (FIT) in preparation for the Workshop (Staiger et al., 2010). The exercise aimed at gathering firsthand information about stakeholders' expert experiences and considerations regarding the use and knowledge of gender-sensitive participatory research in their field(s) of expertise, across the CGIAR centers, NARS, NGOs and other partner organizations. This information served as input to the workshop. A qualitative survey was designed with scale and open-ended short-answer questions. The survey was web-based, with email invitations sent to all participants. This approach was complemented with the possibility of follow up where participants agreed by providing their contact information. All survey participants were either specialists in gender and participation or practitioners of participatory approaches. The demand analysis survey, titled 'Repositioning PRGA in Times of Change,' was applied during April and May 2010. A total of 76 e-mail invitations to participate in the webbased survey were sent. Thirty-eight (38) people responded, 30 of who completed the survey. Simone Staiger-Rivas and Sophie Alvarez (FIT) presented an overview and the major findings of the Demand Analysis.The participants discussed the Demand Analysis, guided by the following questions:• What are the key findings and conclusions of the Demand Analysis?• How can positive actions and new opportunities be reinforced and generated?After the discussion, groups shared their insights in plenary, and especially with the 'drafting team' (a team within the workshop which gathered insights and lessons from group discussions, to compile into the Strategy and Action plan at the end of the workshop). Besides suggestions on how to improve the study, participants discussed how positive actions and new opportunities could be reinforced and generated. Comments favored network and partnership issues, highlevel support and buy-in, knowledge-sharing and capacity-strengthening, and the active use of GRPR in the research cycle. The notes taken by each group are presented in Annex 4.This session aimed at enriching the strategic reflections by bringing in the experiences of workshop participants on GRPR. The panel consisted of presentations (presenters' names in bold), followed by clarifying questions and discussion: The presentations are available online at Key issues in gender-responsive participatory research Panel Papers and summaries are presented in Annex 5.The participants then had the opportunity to join a discussion group on the panel topic of their choice, in order to explore further the key issues presented in the panel, using the following discussion questions:1. Why is gender-responsive research and action critical to this issue? 2. What are the major areas of research pending?Notes of what was discussed in the groups, used as input into the Strategy and Action plan, are presented in Annex 6.To begin the day, the facilitator led a 'thermometer' exercise with the group. In this exercise, participants were asked to indicate how close, on a scale of 0-10, they felt the workshop was toward achieving the objectives and expectations. The result was a voting between 5 and 7. The facilitator then presented the agenda for the day, and introduced the feedback that had been compiled for sharing by the reporters of discussion groups of day 1. This feedback can be found in the Day 2 Newsletter (Annex 9).At this point, it was deemed necessary for participants to have a clearer view of the present context in which the CGIAR finds itself as a condition for the strategic reflections. The latest state of the thinking behind the CGIAR Mega-Programs and the restructuring of the CGIAR were presented by Maya Rajasekharan, the CIAT Program Officer. Rajasekharan coordinates and supports the development and implementation of strategic research directions and has therefore been involved in 'keeping track' of Mega-Program developments and status. Her PowerPoint presentation is available online.Her explanation and update on Mega-Programs development was an entry point for a series of questions, particularly from those participants who were not directly associated with the CGIAR change process. A particular value of Rajasekharan's presentation was her explanation of the scope of CIAT's work, since the Center is currently involved in most Mega-Programs, even though it is not leading any of them.After the CGIAR Mega-Programs presentation, the group again divided into sub-groups, for discussion based on the question 'What needs to be done if gender-responsive participatory research is to make a difference?' The results of this discussion were fed into the Strategy and Action plan, and were used as input for the 'Matrix' exercise on Day 3.Marketplace was a space for practitioners of GRPR from around the world to share their experiences in applying and documenting their use of participatory research or gender analysis in their work . To start the exercise, each of the four Marketplace presenters had the chance to briefly describe in plenary what would be discussed at their table.Furough Olinga, representative of the Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa (ASARECA), presented her organization's 'gender mainstreaming path' and the mainstreaming work conducted in association with SW-PRGA Program including eight NARS of ASARECA. Melania Portilla, from the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), presented her organization and some of its actions for the promotion of gender equality and rural women in Central and Latin America taking into account the territorial approach embraced by IICA. Jeannette Gurung presented her organization, Women Organizing for Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources Management (WOCAN), and some of their training courses and progress in contributing to strengthening women's and men's capacity in gender and leadership in Africa and Asia. Finally, Pedro Oyarzún and Ross Mary Borja from EkoRural presented the NGO's grassroots participatory approach and shared the experience they have had with gender analysis as an endogenous process in rural communities in Ecuador.After listening to the short description of the experience that would be presented at each table, participants chose the topic of greatest interest to them and joined the presentation and discussion there.Day 3 began as day 2, with the 'thermometer' exercise with the group. The results of this exercise demonstrated that participants were feeling increasingly satisfied with how the workshop was accomplishing its objectives and desired results, with scores between 6 and 8. The facilitator then presented the agenda for the day.The first exercise of the day was an Open Space session, where participants had the opportunity to present an experience or discuss an issue of their choice. IWMI's social and institutional researcher Everisto Mapedza presented an experience on gender-mapping. Socio-economist and gender specialist Thelma Paris shared IRRI's work on gender and rice 'Addressing gender issues in rice research and technology development.' INIA's agronomist Nohemi Zúñiga talked about an experience of participatory varietal selection. IFPRI economists Amber Peterman and Julia Behrman presented 'Gender research at IFPRI: Reflections and strategic directions' along with some considerations about IFPRI's Gender Task Force. The Open Space was also an opportunity for virtual presentations: Jemimah Njuki of the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) presented her organization's work with livestock and gender. Njuki is a social scientist whose main responsibilities are to develop a research area around gender and livestock, support gender integration within the institute, and develop methods for participatory monitoring and evaluation of livestock interventions. Finally, Miguel Gomez, Director of the Regional Unit for Technical Assistance (RUTA), a governmental and inter-agency initiative of the Ministers of Agriculture of the seven Central American countries and several external cooperation partner agencies, presented his organization's policy work supporting the inclusion of a gender perspective in sustainable rural development policies and initiatives. RUTA gives special attention to female entrepreneurs and indigenous populations, while promoting strategies and actions that recognize and emphasize the contributions that women and young people make to sustainable rural development. A presentation by Ravula Padmaja, a Senior Scientific Officer in the Global Theme on Institutions, Markets, Policy and Impacts of the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), on ICRISAT's experiences with gendersensitive participatory research couldn't be realized during the workshop due to technical problems, but was shared before the workshop and is available on the website.This particular exercise, facilitated by Dindo Campilan, a social scientist in participatory genderresponsive agricultural research in the International Potato Center (CIP), was an unplanned initiative that was enthusiastically embraced by participants who contributed their ideas to a 'matrix' of suggested approaches and outcomes related to GRPR in the preparation of the Mega-Programs.The following Mega-Programs and sub-programs were considered: Agriculture for Improved Nutrition and Health 5.Water Scarcity and Land Degradation 6.Forests and Trees 7.Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Some approaches and methods were considered useful to all Mega-Programs, across the board:• Gender analysis A summary of the results of this exercise is presented in Annex 7, which was provided to Mega-Program team writers, to enrich their planning process.During the workshop, the results and insights generated during group discussions, plenary presentations and discussions, Q&A sessions after presentations, and in general all exercises were followed by a pre-selected group, 'drafting committee,' in charge of documenting these for the 'Draft Strategy Outline.' This strategy document also benefited from feedback from participants after 'working drafts' of the strategy were presented in newsletters during the work days.The workshop organizers wished to have a session with some quick concrete ideas of what the next steps could be for the CIAT-PRGA Program. We used a 'fishbowl' dynamic rather than classical plenary to elicit participants' ideas. This brainstorming session was divided into two types of feedback: (1) concrete ideas for next steps on GRPR, and (2) concrete ideas for CIAT as coordinator of those steps. A major part of the session focused on the first issue and participants identified similar priority topics: promotion, communication, networking, partnerships.Meanwhile the input into strategic directions was very diverse. Notes on the main ideas proposed and discussed by participants are presented in Annex 8.One outcome of this exercise was the suggestion to establish an Interim Committee to continue supporting the GRPR Strategy for the International Agricultural Research System. The Interim Committee was formed by the three members of the SW-PRGA Program's Advisory Committee present at the workshop, and will be headed by John Dixon. The same people comprise the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to the CIAT-PRGA Program.At the end of the workshop, participants had an 'After Action Review,' where they mentioned positive things that happened during the workshop, 'not-so-positive' elements, and how they would improve on these aspects for any similar workshop in the future. In general, comments were very positive and highlighted the excellent job done by the PRGA Program logistics and organizing teams. An in-depth participants' evaluation of the workshop was conducted via survey after the workshop. Thirty-eight (38) participants completed the online survey that aimed at a deeper workshop analysis.Overall impression: From a scale from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest rating and 10 the highest, participants rated their overall impression very positively between 8 and 10. Participants gave the highest and almost equal rating to: (1) the energy and excitement in the discussions: 33 respondents (87%); (2) the opportunity for connection with others: 31 (84%); and (3) the atmosphere and spirit of the meeting: 31 (82%). Achievement of workshop objectives was rated at an average of 8.• Identify practical ways to revitalize GRPR that meets the needs of women and men small-scale farmers: 24 (63%) rated the achievement of this objective between 8 and 10.• Design a strategy to support GRPR in the new CGIAR including the context of the Mega-Programs: 23 (61%) rated the achievement of this objective between 8 and 10.• Explore the relevance of GRPR taking into account the results of the demand analysis conducted at the system level and also including other partner organizations: 21 (57%) respondents rated the achievement of this objective between 8 and 10.• General achievement of participants' expectations of the workshop: 19 (53%) respondents rated the achievement of this objective between 8 and 10.Best sessions: Among the sessions participants liked most were the panel: 29 (76%) respondents rated the session between 8 and 10; the keynote: 26 (68%) respondents rated the session between 8 and 10; and the strategic group discussions (68%).Significant sessions: We asked respondents which sessions were particularly significant or memorable for them, and why. Six out of 23 mentioned the Fishbowl. The first part of this activity went very well and brought up good points, also the exercise favored lateral thinking; it was a new technique and resulted in many opinions and ideas. Respondents also mentioned the strategic group discussions and panel presentations.When asked for three action items as important next steps for repositioning GRPR, the following replies were given (grouped into categories by the authors of this report).• Formation of a network of champions within and outside CGIAR/platform for GRPR • The CIAT-PRGA Program should promote itself and its achievements much more to gain more Workshop logistics: 30 respondents (86%) rated the workshop logistics between 8 and 10. They most appreciated the support to participants, the evening socials, but also gave high rates to CIAT as a meeting location, the guest house and food. Participants were less satisfied with the connectivity, and would have liked to have had more free time.In their final survey remarks, most participants (13 out of 22 comments) expressed their satisfaction with the event. Further comments included: (1) the lack of accomplishment of the objectives and criticized the involvement of some participants as reporters (requested by the organizers at the beginning of the workshop); (2) the need for further in-depth discussion; (3) the importance to address the issue well in the Mega-Programs; (4) the need for a more culturally diverse perspective on GRPR; and (5) the lack of closure. we need to think how to improve the institutional setting 11. The CGIAR way to choose their partners in civil society 12. Need to clarify concepts such as what is a plant breeder? There is not just [one] way to do plant breeding, there are a lot of ways to do it 13. Women are totally marginalized in food production recognition of women's roles in the production process 14. Need to discuss about gender and social inclusiveness 15. Gender approach has to do with change of behavior, so there is a need to consider this when developing methodologies and tools to address gender issues • Consultation at all levels of research with stakeholders Since the early 1990s, substantial advances have been made in the application of participatory methods in agricultural research, especially in plant breeding. However, understanding of and responsiveness to the different roles and needs of men and women farmers have been slow. Meanwhile, gender differences in livestock-raising have been well documented, and the failure of livestock research programs may be attributed to lack of user participation. Also in naturalresources management (NRM), there has been much work reporting the division of labor (roles) and responsibilities between men and women, but little or no gender-targeted problem-solving research. The world in general and agriculture in particular are changing-in the biophysical environment (e.g. climate change, water scarcity, erosion, desertification), socio-economically (e.g. family structure, markets), and the 'information revolution.' To meet the agricultural needs of the twenty-first century, research needs to actively solve problems and understand (analyze) the processes of change. Gender-responsive research needs to go beyond description to actionresearch for change-change to improve the welfare status of the impoverished farmers for and with whom we are working.Women are key agricultural producers (35-50% of farmers in Latin America and the Caribbean to 85% in Africa); both men and women play actives roles in agriculture for consumption and sale.In a review of (3388) plant-breeding articles in five high-profile journals over the period 2000-2010, a mere 2.0% focused on participatory plant breeding (PB, including participatory varietal selection, PVS) and a paltry 0.7% on gender. The implications are that PB has had only a small impact on 'classical' breeding practice, and that PB renders minimal attention to gender. For the most part, plant PB has mimicked the goals and benefits of 'classical' plant breeding, with little attention paid to other benefits. Women are most often involved in research on 'women's crops' (e.g. sweet potato, beans), and their voices are often only heard in women-only focus groups and surveys. An absence of targeting of PB means more men participate in general, with women more likely to be information-providers. Claims that PB is gender-neutral are unsubstantiated, and lack of consideration of gender limits the ability to maximize the positive effects of PB. Four case studies of gender-responsive PB highlight that women: are often good predictors of overall crop-trait needs; facilitate insights on a wider context and in collaborative processes; can take the lead in technical skills; and experience markedly different constraints from men. Future application of GRPR in crop breeding should focus on 'minor' crops, 'marginal' areas, linking farmers to markets, and benefit-sharing and access arrangements (including intellectual property rights). Participatory breeding requires an open agenda to allow farmer-preferred trade-offs (e.g. high-stress environment vs market) and to address complex issues (e.g. climate change, production, health and conservation goals).The first impacts of global climate change are already upon us (e.g. floods, droughts), but the worst is yet to come. So far, most farmers have merely coped with ongoing changes, with a few making innovative changes. Most models predict that the greatest changes will affect the already vulnerable rural communities in the tropics. To understand how research and development agents can support communities, communities need to be better understood. Communities are not homogeneous entities, as individuals may be differentiated by gender, age, wealth, ethnicity, religion, health or 'stigma.' Consequently, individuals have different vulnerabilities to changes; moreover, an individual's vulnerability may change. It is therefore impossible (and inappropriate) to make broad generalizations. However, individuals are part of their community networks, with their social structures and power struggles-community provides a safety net, but may also exploit particular individuals. Community leaders are not necessarily all good or all bad. In terms of participatory research, experience shows that not all community members will participatesome may not be interested; leaders may appropriate the processes or benefits; and often, the poorest may not get involved. Participatory researchers need to be aware of community networks and their dynamics, and seek to strengthen networks in such a way that they benefit the position of the most vulnerable. Adaptation to climate change means no more 'business as usual' for either the farming communities or the researchers.The purpose of this review is to establish the extent to which gendered relationships are captured in CIFOR's research and to identify new opportunities, including questions and methods for deepening and extending this gender dimension in forestry research. This review is also concerned with CIFOR's need to capture changing global realities and to foster a better understanding of gendered relationships in order to inform policy and practice. The review finds an increasing commitment in CIFOR to incorporate gender analysis in its research as demonstrated by its strategy, its 3-year operation plans, and the increasing numbers of projects that incorporate gender. While gender is incorporated in projects across all three continents that CIFOR focuses on (Africa, Asia and Latin America) and addresses a broad range of thematic areas in forestry, it is addressed in a narrow sense and is equated with the collection of sexdisaggregated data. Little attempt has been made to explore gendered relationships, their drivers and the interactions with broader processes of concern to CIFOR; and the research remains largely descriptive of differential effects on men and women. The development of a gender-in-forestry conceptual framework, the identification of clearer gender-related impact pathways from research to policy/practice impacts, and the use of multiple methodologies can allow for a more systematic research design that addresses the causes, effects and interactions of gendered relationships in forestry.• Gender-responsive research still critical-we are still dealing with issues of exclusion-they have not gone away and are getting worse, e.g. due to REDD and other emerging problems, e.g. land grabs for biofuels • Women lack political participation.What are the major areas of required research? 1. REDD and women's collective action to capture rents from carbon markets/trade; equitable benefits capture/distribution 2. Certification (high-value market opportunities)-relative gains to men and women from engaging in certification (higher prices for standards that incorporate social and environmental benefits) programs in cocoa production 3. Property rights/access to natural resources and enhanced adaptation for men and women 4. Impacts of women on land-grabbing for REDD, biofuels and food security 5. Incentives for conservation-how women are benefitting from payment for environmental services approaches 6. Indigenous knowledge-differentiation between men and women 7. What are women's roles in mixed user groups? 8. Access to policy-makers especially by women; policy should be approved by users themselves 9. Gender in social movements 10. (a) what is the substance of the statement? (b) how to get the current meeting to vote on it (c) how to get the statement officially out to Mega-Programs (e.g. through CIAT DG?) Substance issues 1. 'PPB' should be changed to 'PB,' 'participatory breeding.' Fish and Livestock also require PB initiatives. To get a participatory perspective in fish and livestock breeding will require some technical advances-but also significant behavioral modifications among the breeders involved 2. To effect PB, there is still the real challenge of getting different disciplines together. Social scientists and gender specialists are vitally needed on the teams 3. There needs to be research on actual methods to include women in PB-there are some cultures where this is very difficult. Are some methods and approaches better than others? 4. The delivery phase needs now to be included in the realm of PB. This will involve methods evolution-but also real policy change. Some of the issues: • use of farmer data in variety release • the moving of non-released varieties (into seed production)• how to link PB with seed production-equitably • concerns that non-released varieties will go to the private sector? (Fingerprinting?) 5. Trait trade-offs. Much more work needs to be done here-e.g. the trade-offs of micronutrients and production-what do farmers want?-drought resistance and market value. 6. Gains of PB. This needs to be a prime area of concerted focus. To have a concrete set of guidelines, and to prepare CGIAR Mega-Programs which are gender responsive and participatory, the participants of the workshop propose a set of key elements that should be considered in the preparation of Mega-Programs. The suggested GRPR outcomes and approaches for inclusion in the Mega-Programs are summarized below. Numbering refers to the Mega-Program or component. Some approaches and methods were considered useful to all Mega-Programs, across the board:• Gender analysis "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2666702410.json b/main/part_2/2666702410.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b079d569c589992378e45cd2d3b40fd812ec07fb --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2666702410.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0571d0152e18530603098e2581aa8f40","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/03324603-956c-496b-8989-0542a674e01a/retrieve","id":"77640578"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1ee0a273-812e-44ac-ad15-900e724b7653","content":"Archaeological remains of Phaseolus lunatus L. years before present Huacaloma,Karl von Linnaeus described two bean species (out of 11) :In Species Plantarum, 1 st edition (1753)Phaseolus puberulus H.B.K.The same species: Piper 1926, van Eseltine 1931, Verdcourt 1970, Westphal 1974 note the geographic origins = indicators of quick post-Columbus diffusions into the Old World !What is (are) the plant (s) from which the crop originates (through domestication) ?Understanding the domestication syndrome helps to visualize the wild ancestor(s)At first : Later on : How to find out about the origin of a crop ?What is the distribution of the wild plant/ weed seen as 'ancestor' ?Where did/ does the domestication take place ? Fofana et al. 1999, 2001Maquet et al. 1994, 1997, 1999Fofana et al. 1997Lioi et al. 1998 RFLPs on rDNA Jacob et al. 1995Lioi et al. 1998 microsatellites on nDNA Lioi et al. 2001, 2002Lioi 1994, 1996Lioi et al. 1991, 1999 AFLPs on gDNA The \"small-seeded\" wild Lima beans equally distant to the \"large-seeded\" ones !  two domestication events, one in W Mexico (M1) and one in NW Peru (A1) but Brazil, so another event in the M2 gene pool !?\" there would be little fascination in Science if it were static \"Prof. Jack R. Harlan, 1992 the differentiation of small-seeded 'Sieva' and 'Potato' has now little support  a very drastic founder effect occurs during the domestication  long-distance transportation of the benefits of domestication  further progress will come if (only if !) we go back to the field  erosion of landraces, potential of the wild forms/ species of the phylum  not back to \"square one\" however, because A1 and M1 domestications are clear"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2670699669.json b/main/part_2/2670699669.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f78ee61ea69bd3b0675d0c551a7a9593ead4c12d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2670699669.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d9cfd21e046b2534797978ff8695c5d5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/81eb30f3-54a1-4f53-b9fb-4f4c6cfdd0ea/retrieve","id":"1720563389"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"093cb079-60b3-46a8-a840-b8fbefb6d7a6","content":"v Analysis of livestock and fodder value chains in arid and semi-arid lands in Kenya vii ix x Currently, livestock markets in the county are weak. Livestock farmers are forced to travel for long distances to access the livestock markets, making the exercise expensive in terms of time and energy. Some livestock markets in the counties have livestock market associations (LMAs) in place but only a few (<5%) of them implement the revenue sharing co-management model.The AVCD-LC project should support enactment of county sale yard bill in Garissa, Isiolo and Marsabit counties' and stakeholders' fora to enhance ownership and implementation of the comanagement model which will improve livestock market management and sustainability of the model. The project should also support restructuring and the organizational development of both the Kenya Livestock Marketing Council (KLMC) and the county livestock marketing councils xiv Analysis of livestock and fodder value chains in arid and semi-arid lands in Kenya (CLMCs) in all the counties, as well as the establishment of audit systems to promote good governance, accountability and transparency in the management of livestock markets.Awareness raising among livestock producers by the AVCD-LC project to encourage market off-take is a critical intervention. Farmers should also be encouraged to participate in the market especially when sale prices are high and save the proceeds which can be used later to meet other family needs. Training on finance and awareness raising for pastoralists can increase market offtake and commercial orientation. The project should also link producers to the high-end markets where they can fetch higher prices. This is expected to increase market off-take and reduce conflict which mainly arise as pastoralists compete for scarce resources. AVCD should support the sale of young animals which can be piloted with a few livestock producers and livestock producer groups especially around fodder producing pockets and then link them to buyers. Support for demonstration visits and training workshops is recommended.AVCD could support the establishment support services like M-Pesa and agent banking services by lobbying telecommunication mobile phone companies to upgrade the cell phone network in the area. Linkage of producers and input suppliers like agro-veterinarian dealers to financial institutions would enable them get loans which they could use to acquire equipment like motorbikes to reach out to the moving pastoralists and build their drug stock capital.As in many developing countries, the livestock revolution is real in Kenya which presents huge opportunities to improve the livelihoods of the pastoral community through improved production and marketing in the pastoral land-use system. To attain the promise of Vision 2030 and unlock the potential of arid and semi-arid lands in Kenya, intervention strategies and production systems need to be aligned with the ongoing change in: demand/consumption for animal-source foods (ASFs) and in the production environment. The average per capita red meat consumption in Kenya is about 15-16 kg, approximately 600,000MT2 of red meat nationally. Of this, about 80-86% comes from the pastoral production system, while 20-25% of the meat supply comes from the neighbouring countries (through formal and informal cross-border livestock trade) with Ethiopia, Somalia, Uganda and Tanzania.The Livestock component of the Accelerated Value Chain Development (AVCD) program recently undertook a livestock and fodder value chains analysis to the inform design and implementation of high impact and targeted interventions across five counties in northern Kenya (Isiolo, Garissa, Marsabit, Turkana and Wajir). Operating with the framework of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)-funded Feed the Future Initiative in Kenya.The program promotes and upscales the utilization of improved technologies and innovations of selected value chains (livestock, dairy, and staple root and drought-tolerant crops) to competitively and sustainably increase productivity, promote agricultural growth and improve nutrition and food security, particularly among women and children. The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) leads the AVCD livestock value chain whose main goal is to increase incomes from the sales of livestock by 50% by 2018, lifting an additional 50,000 households in selected regions of Kenya out of poverty and improving their nutritional status.The study targeted the core activities in the livestock value chains (production and marketing) and fodder production as a support value chain. Primary data was collected from two counties (Isiolo and Marsabit), while secondary data from recently conducted studies was used for the remaining three counties. Value chain actors were mapped and opportunities and constraints faced by actors in the two value chains identified. Three best-bet county-based interventions were identified as key priority interventions for the AVCD-LC project. The most important livestock in these five counties are: cattle, camel, sheep and goats, with camel becoming more popular than cattle in some areas due to their ability to withstand the changing climate and the fact that camel prices are higher in domestic and international markets.This report presents the status of livestock and fodder value chains, describing the main actors and their relationships, the value chains functions, support markets and business enabling environment.It also provides an assessment of the existing gaps and missing markets. The challenges and opportunities for upgrading the value chains were identified.Nairobi and Mombasa are the leading demand centres for slaughter animals and, therefore, serve as the main terminal markets. Per capita consumption in Nairobi and Mombasa is 25.8 kg and 21.2 kg respectively (Farmer and Mbwika 2012;Behnke and Muthami 2011). To meet such high demand for meat, the approximate supply would need to be: 27,839 cattle, 71,555 shoats and 685 camels and 8,178 cattle, 21,021 shoats and 201 camels for Nairobi and Mombasa end-markets respectively (Farmer and Mbwika 2012).Unfortunately, the bulk of the meat consumed in Kenya is of low quality, but quality preferences vary among consumers. Willingness to pay premiums for quality, reliability and cleanliness is higher among higher-income consumers. Few abattoirs produce superior quality meat and meat products sold to high end hotels, restaurants, supermarkets and export markets at premium prices. Such abattoirs include Kenya Meat Commission, Quality Meat Packers, Farmers Choice, Alpha Fine Foods and Ngare Narok Meat Industries. Higher-end or export-quality meat at retail points (supermarkets and high-end butcheries) sells for an average of KES770-910 per kg compared to KES380-400 for the low-quality meat sold at meat stalls and ordinary butcheries (Farmer and Mbwika 2012).Nomadic pastoralism is the dominant system of production in the study area. However, the rangelands are heavily degraded as the community competes for grazing land. This has led to an increased in overgrazed land and to desertification. Firewood dependency is high which has increased resource depletion and further degraded the land. In addition, producers are largely subsistence-oriented and only sell animals when they need money to buy food, pay for medical expenses, school fees, etc.Some pastoralists said their reluctance to sell their animals was partly a strategy to ensure that when calamities occur, such as drought and the death of livestock, they would still have animals to rebuild their stocks and that they feared losing their indigenous stock which they may not be able to find when it was time to restock. In many cases, therefore, the failure by livestock producers to engage in markets is an adaptation to the formidable environment within which they live.On the other hand, inbreeding is a common practice in these counties. Results on herd composition reveal a large number (up to 17.5% cattle, 10.4% goats, 7.8 % sheep and 5.8% camels in some areas) of uncastrated male animals. Further, the operating environment for livestock producers in Kenya is characterized by significant risks, including:• A lack of access to important support services, such as extension, animal health services and market information• Frequent droughts and livestock disease outbreaks which are closely associated with the ongoing climate change phenomena. In a recent drought, livestock producers in some arid and semi-arid land (ASAL) areas lost nearly 50% of their herds.• Market failure attributable to problems such as lack of infrastructure, insecurity and rule of law.• Changing policy and institutional environment.The following recommendations are the possible areas for AVCD investments and strategies to ensure the proposed interventions deliver the desired outcomes.A key prerequisite in promoting the commercialization of the livestock sector is the development of transparent and competitive markets. The theory of competition assumes perfect information among both buyers and sellers. Results from a survey of livestock producers during this study, however, showed that most were often uninformed about prevailing prices (about 60%) and the desired quality by buyers (76%) in livestock markets where they sell their animals. Among those who claimed to be informed about market conditions, most (88%) cited other livestock producers who have recently visited the market as their source of information. An important challenge related to 'other livestock producers' as a source of market information is that messages passed across may not be fully accurate or up to date.In Kenya, there are many interventions provide market information to smallholder farmers, such as one operated by the Kenya Agricultural Commodity Exchange (KACE) Limited. It covers 42 commodities and collects information on farm inputs. There have also been other initiatives to set up livestock market information systems in pastoral areas in Kenya in the past.The Livestock Information Network and Knowledge System (LINKS), the Ministry of Livestock and KLMC set up and operated the now dysfunctional National Market Information System. The sustainability of these project-funded initiatives tends to be a challenge after the project ends. A potential way of mitigating this drawback is by designing an information system that allows for the entry and exit of sponsors with minimal disruptions and which should be hosted at a government ministry or an organization such as KLMC. Such a system could work closely with the LMAs in charge of managing livestock markets which could be used to collect the required market information for dissemination.However, as a stop gap measure before the establishment of the market information system, the LMAs could be used to gather market information and disseminate it through billboards erected at livestock markets. The LINKS project used to display market information in Garissa and at other livestock markets. AVCD-LC should, therefore, leverage the work being done by KACE and collaborate with county governments and other development partners to establish sustainable interventions to mitigate the challenges related to market information asymmetry in the production and marketing of livestock and livestock products.Improving the timeliness, accuracy and utility of livestock market information would improve producers' ability and incentives to increase commercial livestock production and sales. The project should develop a Livestock Market Information System which can handle information bundling services and should include information on: prevailing market prices, disease outbreak, forage availability, livestock inputs, etc. The use of local radio FM stations and billboards should also be explored to disseminate market information, especially on prices. The dissemination of information on quality requirements to producers would help them meet the demand side requirements.The quality of animals presented in domestic livestock markets for sale is generally very poor (Little et al. 2014). The absence of a grading system which clearly identifies livestock attributes, their levels and the different categories corresponding to each animal grade hinders the provision of quality animals to terminal markets and does not encourage livestock producers to improve the quality of their animals and fetch higher prices. It will be important that the project develops and implements this this animal grading system with the help of county livestock departments and the national government livestock department which has showed interest in establishing a national grading scheme. The experience in Somaliland of animal grading and ILRI involvement there could provide the required skills, experience and information to develop such a system in Kenya.Veterinary services offered by county governments are limited and insufficient (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015 a, b, c). Producers mainly rely on indigenous knowledge to treat their animals.The most common livestock diseases in shoats are: contagious caprine pleuropneumonia (CCPP), coenuroseis which is caused by worm, enterotoxaemia, goat and sheep pox and pests des petits ruminants (PPR). In cattle, the most common diseases are FMD, Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP), congolensis dermatopholsis and lumpy skin disease. In camels, the most common diseases are: trypanosomiasis, haemorrygic septaecemia, camel pox, worms, external parasites and ercia (camel sudden death syndrome), while in young camels, they are orf, ring worms and mange.A discussion with county veterinary department officials of Isiolo and Marsabit counties revealed that transboundary diseases (e.g. lumpy skin disease, FMD among others) have increased in recent years, almost becoming an annual occurrence mainly due to the failure to impose quarantine due outbreaks. This has been compounded by a lack of enforcement of livestock movement controls, porous borders and inadequate annual vaccination coverage. It is recommended that the AVCD-LC project raise awareness on: the effects of livestock drugs misuse or wrong drugs usage and administration; and uptake of strategic vaccination and not emergency vaccination which is said to cause death, abortion and loss of animal condition.The project should also pilot uptake of acaricides which have higher safety margins and support the capacity building of agro-veterinarian dealers through short animal health courses.Collaboration with all the stakeholders (individual farmers, private vet service providers, nongovernmental extension providers, government veterinarian and extension providers is highly recommended to enhance the uptake and sustainability of health-related interventions in the county to produce the health-related qualities of livestock demanded by the market.Promotion and support for strategic feed reserve production model (fodder and fodder seed production in potential pockets)AVCD-LC could support fodder production in the counties by training the crop producers to integrate fodder in their cropping program and to also expand irrigated land so as to accommodate fodder production. The crop producers should also be trained on fodder conservation such that they can be able to bail and conserve the crop residues and other fodder feeds (like acacia pods) which can be used during drought. Elements of value addition of fodder (like addition of Urea etc.) and local feed formulation should also be given focus.The project can support the fodder production model around the dairy goat farming groups to create fodder market for themselves and others. This model can be scaled up with a few sampled individual producers who can be supported with initial improved goat breeds coupled with fodder production. In addition, AVCD LC should promote and support fodder production through sensitization campaigns/training to especially to people of more limited wealth. Establishment of linkages between fodder producers and demand side should be supported. Pastoralists should also be trained on intensification of livestock production, expected to create fodder marketing opportunities. Research on more cost-effective storage solution should also be supported.The AVCD-LC project could support the establishment of linkages and acquisition of business development skills especially to women and young people in alternative economic activities, such as in the food, clothing and agricultural input sectors, such as veterinary and other agroinput services). Private investments in weighing scales by especially the women and young people could be supported. AVCD-LC could also support the processing and marketing of hides and skins especially by working with the producer groups in various counties. This would create employment for many jobless individuals in the counties.Imparting business development skills on hides and skins would enhance trade in hides and skins.Training should also be offered to flayers, selectors, graders, traders and rural tannery units to increase the quality and prices of hides and skins traded. Linkages with the end market, like Bata Shoes Company, could promote hides and skins business in the county. A few private investors (like Sidai) could be informed of the benefits of stocking industrial salt used in processing of hides and skins.Targeted business development skills in Turkana county especially in line with: fish farming, harvesting, processing, preservation and trade for women and young people would increase the income sources available to these categories of people. In addition, a few livestock lodges (a sleep over secure holding ground for animals on transit to/from the livestock markets) could be piloted around sampled livestock markets in the study counties. This innovation which is currently practiced in Moyale should be replicated in sampled livestock markets within the study counties.The AVCD livestock project is part of the feed the future AVCD program funded by USAID in Kenya which seeks to promote and upscale utilization of improved technologies and innovations in selected value chains (livestock, dairy, and staple root and drought-tolerant crops) so as to competitively and sustainably increase productivity, promote agricultural growth, and improve nutrition and food security particularly among women and children. The AVCD livestock project is being implemented in five counties in northern Kenya including Garissa, Isiolo, Marsabit, Turkana, and Wajir and the goal is to increase incomes from livestock sales by 50% thus lifting 50,000 households out of poverty and improving their nutritional status.To achieve this, the project has four objectives: i. To enhance market access for 60,000 pastoralists, pastoralists and small traders. Proposed activities under this objective focuses on improving market management through capacity development of market associations, producers, traders and entrepreneurs; development of a market information system; introduction of fattening schemes to increase the value of animals sold; and advocacy work to reduce trade barriers along the value chain between counties.ii. To increase livestock productivity for 30,000 producers. Suggested activities to achieve this objective include enhancing availability and access to fodder and forage through improved grazing management and fodder production enterprises; improving animal health through market interventions and creating sustained demand for health services; training of producers in disease recognition and working through market associations to improve surveillance of disease out breaks; and improving quality of animals sold through implementing community based herd management.iii. To enhance the enabling environment for 20 markets and 30 communities. This will be achieved through establishment of revenue sharing agreements for markets and development of community land use plans.iv. To contribute to improved nutrition of women and children among 50,000 households. Planned activities to achieve this include improving the home consumption of milk by children and to increase consumption of milk and meat by women of child bearing age.The project is seeking to complement activities of other USAID-funded programs, popularly known as Partnership for Resilience and Economic Growth (PREG) partners that include: Two resilience projects i.e. Resilience and Economic Growth in the Arid Lands-Improving Resilience (REGAL IR) and Accelerated Growth (REGAL AG), Kenya Resilient Arid Lands Partnership for Integrated Development, Agile Harmonized Assistance to the Devolved Institutions (AHADI) etc.The arid areas in Kenya constitute about 60% of the land mass and are home for approximately 30% of the population. The land use system in the region is predominantly pastoralism and extensive grazing. The region has the highest levels of poverty, over 60%, exacerbated by poor accessibility and frequent droughts. It is estimated that the drought period spanning 2008-2011, resulted in a loss of USD8 billion in the livestock sector. The impact of frequent drought is severe hunger, malnutrition and extensive loss of livelihood, with diminished resilience. Due to the increased frequency of cyclic droughts in the region, which exacerbate the vulnerability of pastoral communities, the urgency to explore high impact interventions to address the needs of these communities has risen dramatically. Reversing trends of increasing poverty levels, maintaining the trends in reducing food insecurity and malnutrition, and adapting to climate change, calls for sustained support to reforms and development in the pastoralism and agricultural sector. Given the high dependency of pastoralist livelihoods on livestock and livestock products, addressing production and marketing challenges offers the potential to reducing vulnerability, increasing resilience and reducing poverty among these communities.The purpose of this report is to inform interventions by the AVCD Livestock component. The goals are to (i) come up with a checklist of possible activities and opportunities for the AVCD project to invest in; and (ii) identification of existing information gaps in the value chains by performing a synthesis of recent value chain studies in the project area.This research was based on the use of both primary and secondary data. A first phase of primary data collection consisted in field visits/scoping to the five counties and meetings with keyinformants, county officials and livestock directors. In the second phase, we undertook a desk research and review of the existing recent literature and data on livestock and fodder value chain analysis in the five counties. From the bibliography search and review, we identified the existing gaps and the specific additional data needs. For Garissa, Turkana and Wajir counties, the existing literature was exhaustive and very recent. We have just added additional information on animal health collected by our ILRI project colleagues.For Isiolo and Marsabit counties, the secondary data, and the value chain analysis reports identified did not include the required information, and were not recently elaborated. For this reason, we opted to collect primary data for both the livestock and fodder value chains. We first developed and then pretested the tools. We opted for both focus group discussions and individual questionnaires for data collection. Focus group discussions were held with livestock value chain actors (producers, traders, brokers, processors/butchers, county livestock department official), and with fodder value chain actors (producers, traders, etc.). For the livestock value chain, individual face-to-face questionnaires were implemented with producers, traders, brokers, and processors. For the fodder value chain, we individually interviewed producers and traders.For the focus group discussions, we organized a one-day session for each value chain (livestock and fodder). We previously developed a checklist including different questions in relation to the mapping of the value chain actors, the interactions between the different actors, the prices, the costs and revenues, the main constraints faced, the service providers supporting the value chain, etc.For the individual surveys, we followed a stratified random sampling to select the villages from each county. We first identified the production systems in each county. Three production systems prevail in both counties and include: pastoral, agro-pastoral (millet sorghum based) and maize based. Then from each production system we randomly selected locations and from each location we randomly selected villages. We opted to visit each village during its livestock market day (if there is a livestock market in the village) or the closet livestock market to that village. We targeted a gender balance when interviewing the value chain actors, but in many cases the number/ share of women involved in specific activities across the value chain was very low or almost inexistent. We trained the enumerators and two persons from ILRI team were overseeing the process of data collection and immediately checking the questionnaires after completion. More than two weeks of field data collection in each county were necessary to complete the task.Figure 4 presents a generalized map of the livestock value chain in the five AVCD project counties in northern Kenya. The value chain map is based on the observations, interviews with key informants during the scoping visits, primary data collected from the field work, as well as from recent available literature on livestock and the red meat sector in Kenya including International Development (2014), livestock value chain studies by Naitos Golden Inspiration (2015) in Turkana, Wajir and Garissa which form part of the livestock work by Regal-IR in northern Kenya and a study on the small ruminants sector by Alexovich et al. (2012). Others include value chain studies by Chabari and Njoroge (2014), Matete and Shumba (2015) The core activities in the value chain comprise of livestock production, marketing, slaughter and/or processing, and meat and meat products marketing. The main actors include pastoral producers, livestock traders (these are of different types including bush, primary and secondary market traders), brokers, butchers, meat sellers, and animal trekkers and truckers hired to transport animals. The sections below present a summary of key issues at different stages in the value chain including the delivery of support services and inputs required by the core actors and the environment (physical, economic, social cultural, technological, political and legal) within which the value chain is immersed and which has implications on its performance.Livestock production is the main activity driving the value chain and is performed by pastoral producers. The ASALs hosts about 70% of the national livestock herd with an estimated value of about KES70 billion annually from 23.2 million animals (Republic of Kenya 2008). The AVCD project targeted counties are predominantly arid and semi-arid and pastoralism is the dominant way of life among communities there. The most important species of animals reared include cattle, camel, sheep, and goats. While the relative importance of these species varies across different counties, the current trend shows reducing importance of cattle perhaps due to their higher vulnerability during drought and growing importance of camels and small ruminants which are more resilient, disease resistant and easy to transfer from one area to another (KIPPRA 2016).Figure 1 shows the average number of animals owned: 71% are shoats, 18% cattle and 11% camels for households in all the five study counties. The average number owned by a household for each county are: 9, 38, 6, 9 and 11 (cattle), 1.5, 17.2, 12, 7 and 6 (camels), 62, 68.7, 55, 25 and 68 (shoats) for Isiolo, Garissa, Marsabit, Wajir and Turkana counties respectively. Garissa county has the highest number of animals owned per household for all animal categories. Animal production and marketing in ASAL areas in Kenya takes place in the back drop of huge social cultural, economic, environmental and other challenges.Pastoral producers are often not commercial oriented but rather view their livestock as assets and only sell them when there is need for money or due to distress of catastrophes such as drought. With the producers not being responsive to market forces, most (98%) of the animals and meat produced is of low quality. Estimates for 2014 indicate that beef has the largest market share with 527,529 metric tonnes produced.Drought represents a serious threat, with some groups losing up to 50% of their herds during severe droughts. There is a lot of range land destruction due to overgrazing and lack of grazing management. Producers also lack knowledge on grazing and husbandry best practices. On the other hand, animal health services and inputs are widely lacking at the grass roots. The producers also suffer lack of access to market information including prices and quality requirements by end markets. Roads and other necessary infrastructure are often poor or lacking. The region is ravaged by insecurity including frequent incidences of animal rustling and ethnic conflicts triggered by competition for scarce resources. Women take part in the value chain and are mainly present at production level. They especially take care of the small ruminants and are responsible for milk trading when it is the case. Men are mainly focused on large ruminants (cattle and camels) and migrate with the animals during the dry season looking for pasture for the animals. Besides locally produced animals, the livestock marketing system in northern Kenya also features export and import of livestock. Imports mainly involve cattle and small ruminants entering the domestic marketing system from Somalia, Ethiopia, Sudan and Uganda through the common boundaries with counties in northern Kenya. The export trade mostly features camels which are often moved to Somalia and Ethiopia and subsequently exported to the Middle East where prices for these animals tend to be relatively high. There is also export of meat and meat products by some export grade abattoirs such as Quality Meat Packers, Farmer's Choice, NEEMA livestock slaughtering investment and the Kenya Meat Commission (KMC) but this often feature animals reared in commercial ranches.Points of sale for domestically produced livestock include 'farm gate', primary, secondary and terminal markets. The different points of sale correspond with different types of livestock traders (bush, primary and secondary market traders) (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015a,b,c).Value captured by producers often tend to be low due to factors including poor quality of animals sold, lack of a grading system and presence of many intermediaries in the marketing chains who eat up margins (International Development 2014). Discussions with stakeholders' (producers and county livestock officials) often revealed huge desire to export livestock and meat which has seen construction of export grade abattoirs in many of the counties (most of these abattoirs have not been finalized yet). Animals prices in various domestic markets (feeder, regional and end markets) are presented in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Animal prices vary greatly in all the market categories with higher prices fetched in the end markets for all animal species. Goats fetch a higher price than the sheep in all the markets while cattle fetch lower price than camels across all the markets. A goat can fetch a price of up to KES6,000 in the feeder market and KES15,000 in the end markets while that of camel can be as high as KES130,000. This explains the current trend where camels are replacing cattle in most of the study counties coupled with its resilience to the changing climate. On the other hand, there are a number of licensed abattoirs in Nairobi, its environs and in Mombasa as presented in Table 2 below. Almost all the abattoirs are operating below their full capacity while others are not in operation. Most of these abattoirs provide market for animals coming from the pastoral areas. Much of the meat from these abattoirs is sold locally to wholesalers and retailers (butchers, Kiosks, Supermarkets, and restaurants) with butcheries accounting for about 65% of the meat sold in Kenya.The end market is also segmented into: high end market, medium-and low-end markets which comprise the highest share of red meat market. Just like the live animal prices, the price for red meat varies from one market segment to another. For example, price ranges from KES200-1,550 per kg based on the market segment. The highest price is for the export grade beef (International Development 2014). Even within the same segment, prices vary based on type of cut (bone meat, or steak and tender, or tough). Tender meat is more priced especially in the middle-and high-end outlets than tough meat. Unfortunately, information access to most players in the livestock value chain is limited while supply of quality meat demanded by higher income market is scarce. Farmer and Bwika (2012) Meat exports are relatively small in Kenya with the main export destinations being the Gulf states with very low exports to Asia and Europe (Farmer and Bwika 2012). One main challenge for the export market related to sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) requirements. Therefore, there is need for the pastoral counties together with the development partners to establish a robust veterinary service delivery system coupled with an enabling environment which will enhance implementation of the required SPS standards. The veterinary department should be supported to enable them implement and enforce screening procedures, embrace strict and thorough vetting of animals at livestock markets before movement and inspection at delivery markets. These measures will strengthen disease surveillance and control, thereby reducing risks and costs to value chain actors as well as improve efficiency along the value chain and promote export of live animals and animal products especially red meat.Potential export markets for livestock and meat from Kenya include countries in the East African community and the Middle East. It is however important to note that exporting of live animals is a significantly lower margin opportunity for Kenya (International Development 2014). For meat, the major constraints include: high price of meat due to lack of modern and scalable operations; weak disease control initiatives and poor hygienic standards in comparison to other exporters such as Australia; highly competitive space with countries offering higher quality at lower prices; perceptions that Kenyan meat exporters are unreliable and unable to deliver the quantities and specifications that were originally ordered; associated logistics and delivery companies are inadequate and unreliable; and poor and inconsistent quality of meat and meat products (International Development 2014).There is huge and rapidly growing demand for meat in Kenya fuelled by population growth, urbanization and rise in people's income (Bosire et al. 2017;Gamba et al. 2005). Nairobi and Mombasa are the leading demand centres for slaughter animals and therefore serve as the main terminal markets. As the demand for meat continues to rise, it is projected that Kenya will find it increasingly difficult to satisfy its local demand for beef and sheep meat through domestic offtake rendering the country increasingly reliant on importation. The bulk of meat consumed in Kenya is low quality and mostly comes from animals raised by pastoral communities. Quality preferences however vary among consumers. Willingness to pay premiums for quality, reliability and cleanliness is higher among higher income consumers (International Development 2014).In line with higher willingness to pay for quality among high income groups, some abattoirs seek to produce superior quality meat and meat products which they sell to high end hotels, restaurants, supermarkets and in export markets at a premium. The abattoirs that target high end consumer segments include the KMC, and other privately-owned enterprises such as Quality Meat Packers, Farmer's Choice, Alpha Fine Foods, and Ngare Narok Meat Industries. Ranches form the main source of animals slaughtered for this high-quality meat trade. Higher end or export quality meat at retail points (supermarkets and high-end butcheries) go for an average of KES770-910 per kg compared to KES380-400 for the low-quality meat sold in meat stalls and ordinary butcheries. For policymakers, AVCD and development actors, the important issue should be how to come up with production and marketing strategies that can aid pastoral producers to also participate and benefit from the high-quality meat trade.Production is done by pastoralists a nd is not commercial oriented.Ani mals are mainly vi ewed as a s tore of wealth (butchers, supermarkets, etc.)Hotels, restaurants, schools, etc.Kenya is a meat deficit country, especially when it comes to beef and lamb where the shortage in domestic supply equated to an estimate of 18% for cattle and 19% for sheep, while goat supply exceeded domestic demand by 26% (International Development 2014). Cross-border livestock trade is the main source of meat supply (in form of live animals) to Kenya. Cattle is traded from Ethiopia through Wajir and Marsabit-Moyale markets and then directed to Garissa or Isiolo livestock markets which are considered as hubs for livestock trade from the northern territories to the terminal markets in Nairobi and Mombasa (Figure 5). In western Kenya, Kitale livestock market receives animals sourced in South Sudan (through Lokichogio market), Ethiopia (through Lodwar market), and Uganda, and serves regional livestock markets like Kisumu and Nakuru (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015a). It is important to highlight that livestock is also exported from Kenya to neighbouring countries: mainly camels and goats to Somalia, and shoats to Ethiopia. However, the volumes/number of animals exported are relatively low compared to the volumes sourced from these countries. Isiolo county borders Marsabit county to the north, Samburu and Laikipia counties to the west, Garissa county to the southeast, Wajir county to the northeast, Tana River and Kitui counties to the south and Meru and Tharaka Nithi counties to the southwest. The county covers an area of about 25,700 km2 and has two parliamentary constituencies (Isiolo North and Isiolo South), three administrative sub-counties (Isiolo, Merti and Garbatulla), 10 wards (Wabera, Bulla pesa, Burat, Ngaremara, Oldonyiro, Chari, Cherab, Kinna, Garbatulla and Sericho), 11 divisions, 22 locations and 43 sub-locations (Isiolo county CIDP 2013). In line with the practice in many value chain studies, this analysis of the Isiolo livestock value chain presents information on themes including: (i) core activities in the value chain; (ii) network of partners supplying services and inputs to the main value chain actors; (iii) co-ordination and governance in the chain; (iv) operating environment; and (v) opportunity for upgrading. The analysis focuses on cattle, camel, sheep and goats produced and marketed for meat. The fouranimal species are the primary focus of the AVCD-livestock project.Core processes in the chain include: livestock production and fattening; animal trading; slaughter; meat marketing; and ultimately consumption. In correspondence, the main actors in the value chain include livestock producers and operators of animal fattening enterprises including: ranches and feedlots; traders including both small-and large-scale dealers; abattoir operators; meat wholesalers; meat retailers; and eventually consumers.Livestock production is the chief activity driving the chain and is the leading source of livelihood among communities in Isiolo county. Nomadic pastoralism is the dominant system of production. Consequently, during the formal survey, majority of producers (98-100% depending on livestock species) reported that they relied on grazing in communal land as a source of feed for their animals (Table 4). Conversely, use of own produced livestock feeds (both crop residues and fodder crops) was documented among only 2-9% of the cattle keepers and 3-8% of the small ruminants' producers. Likewise, use of purchased feeds is scarce having been reported in only 13% and 14% of households with cattle and small ruminants, respectively. The size of livestock herds is a consequence of changes that occur in these herds over time.During the formal survey, information on dynamics in livestock herds during the past 12 months prior to this study was collected. Findings showed that the stocks of animals held by producers mainly accumulated through births (Table 5) which accounted for 83-89% of the total animal inflows in the cases of cattle, sheep and goats. On the other hand, purchases accounted for the largest share (45%) of the inflows in camel herds. Essentially, three out of the seven households that kept camels (43%) had purchased some camels during the past year. In all the three cases the type of camels bought were said to be young females (Figure 6).For the other three species (cattle, sheep and goats), animal purchases were only reported among 13-14% of the producers who kept these types of animals. The largest proportion of animals bought were said to be either young females (41-49% of the small ruminants bought) or entire males (42% of cattle bought). Increase in herd size was the most frequently cited reason why animals were purchased (57-100% of households where animals had been purchased) (Table 6).Breed improvement was cited in 18-20% of the households where small ruminants had been purchased and 30% of the households that had bought cattle. Purchasing animals for fattening was only cited in small ruminants (9% and 10% of households where some sheep and/or goats had been bought). The accumulation of animals in herds through inflows is balanced by reduction through outflows. Sale of animals accounted for most of the outflows (55-60%) from herds of small ruminants and camels (Table 7). Selling of livestock was documented in 55-70% of households with small ruminants, 43% of cattle keeping households and only one of the households that kept and had sold some camels. Surprisingly, the number of heads of cattle lost through death surpassed the number sold which perhaps relates to the vulnerability of this livestock species to the widely prevalent adverse climatic conditions in the study area. On the balance, total outflows differed by a small margin with total inflows across the four species analysed. Mature male animals comprised the bulk of the animals sold (62-66% of the small ruminants, 65% of cattle and a single camel that had been sold in one household (Figure 7). In comparison, adult and young females accounted for only 18-22% and 8-12% of the small ruminants and cattle sold, respectively. Use of improved inputs and technologies in agriculture and livestock production has implications on productivity, quality and safety of products produced which ultimately influences the economic performance of the producers. For this reason, this study also sought to take stock of inputs and technology use among animal producers in the study area. The set of important inputs and services in livestock production relate to feeds, animal health and breeding. A recent development in the Kenyan livestock industry has also seen attempts to introduce livestock insurance services to producers in pastoral areas to mitigate the risk of losses usually occasioned by drought.Ninety-nine per cent of the surveyed producers claimed that they practiced deworming and tick control in their herds of animals. The practice of vaccinating animals to prevent diseases was however less prevalent as it was only reported in 43% of the surveyed households. Government vets were the most frequently cited (66% of producers) source of the vaccination services. Despite agro-veterinarian shops being the most frequently cited source of deworming, tick control and curative treatment services and inputs (about 40% of producers in each case) these input and service providers were only cited as a source of vaccination services by only 19% of the producers. In a total of 43% of cases curative treatment was performed by the producers themselves or their neighbour with or without some professional advice.Mineral supplementation was documented in 54% of households implying that 46% of the households did not. Only 14% of the producers had bought and fed hay to their animals during the past one year. Despite frequent incidences of drought, only 6% of the producers were engaged in feed conservation. Adoption of the recently introduced insurance-based livestock insurance (IBLI) was documented in only 12% of households. Most of the cattle keepers (69%) used own bull for breeding which presents a high possibility for inbreeding. On the other hand, 34% of the producers utilized other peoples' bulls as artificial insemination services are non-existent.The livestock marketing system in Isiolo features both the marketing of animals by livestock producers and the buying and selling of animals by livestock traders. During the marketing process, animals move from primary markets to regional markets and eventually to terminal markets (mainly Nairobi) where they are sold for slaughter. Before reaching the terminal markets, an animal may change hands a number of times. This study identified different types of traders depending on point where animals are purchased and where they are sold. The trader types include: (i) traders who procure animals in bush/primary markets in Isiolo and sells in regional markets in the county; (ii) traders who procure animals in markets in the county and sells in markets in the neighbouring counties; (iii) traders who buy animals in regional markets in the county and sells in the same markets; and (iv) traders who procure animals in markets in the county and sells in Nairobi. Thus, in the value chain some of the meat animals' end up being consumed within the county while others go outside the county.Livestock producers in the bush have several outlets where they sell animals including farm gate, bush/village/feeder markets, and the often far away regional markets such as Odonyiro and Isiolo.For animals sold during the last 12 months in the surveyed households, popularity of market outlets differed with species. Village markets were the most frequently cited point of sale for small ruminants (47-51%) (Table 8). Nevertheless, an appreciable number of producers (41-46%) sold their sheep and goats at regional markets. In contrast for cattle, regional markets were the most frequently cited point of sale (54% of cases). Only 12% and 30% of producers who had sold cattle did so at farm gate and village market, respectively. Prices in regional markets tend to be higher than in bush markets. For example, at the time of this study a bull that could be sold at KES35, 000 in the bush markets could fetch KES40, 000 in the Isiolo market. Livestock marketing between primary and regional markets While many traders who buy animals in primary markets for reselling in regional markets operate individually, a few operate in partnerships. Purchases tend to be relatively more frequent (in some cases daily) than sale (mean=twice a week) with purchased animals being kept for between two and seven days awaiting accumulation of sufficient volumes for delivery to the sale market.Transactions between buyers and sellers in the primary markets tend to be ad-hoc one-time relationships. Buyers usually pay cash for animals and in about 40% of cases the transactions are mediated by brokers. While buying animals in primary markets, the nutritional status of an animal was the most frequently cited factor (all traders) that influence purchase decisions by traders including whether to buy and/or the price to offer.The volume of animals procured and sold by traders who operate between primary and regional markets varies widely with the number ranging between 10 and 120 sheep and/or goats per month among those interviewed during this study. (Distance travelled) Transportation of animals from the bush markets to the regional markets is either by vehicles (% of cases) or trekking (% of cases). Besides buying and selling animals in different markets some of the traders intimated that they also buy animals which they keep and sell in another season to exploit both the seasonal and spatial variation in prices.Table 9 presents the different types of marketing costs incurred by livestock producers and traders between livestock markets in the bush and the Isiolo regional market. For cattle, the highest cost component is the trucking expenses which may go up to KES1,500 per animal. Other costs include county export fee (KES100 per animal even if the destination is within the county), inspection fee (KES100), movement permit (KES30), bribes paid at police road blocks (KES120), security and grazing after arriving in Isiolo pending sale (KES200), holding ground KES50, feed purchase (done during drought season) (KES100). Other costs include accommodation and meals for the seller (producer or trader) and the brokerage fee (KES100). Besides the KES100 brokerage fee, brokers also pocket an indeterminate additional amount generated through haggling with sellers to accept a low price and buyers to pay a higher price. This is made possible because a broker deals with both parties separately implying that the buyer is not privy to the true amount received by the seller and vice versa for the seller.Table 9 also presents the marketing costs for small ruminants between the bush and regional markets. Again, the highest component is the transport cost (KES30,000 per a lorry of 150 animals. Other costs include county export fee (KES12,000), inspection (KES4,500) movement permit (KES200), bribes in police road blocks (KES800), security and grazing after arriving in Isiolo pending sale (KES20/animal), holding ground (KES10/animal), feed purchase (done during drought season) (KES35/ animal). Buyers of animals in regional markets include distant traders, livestock producers (including some who are engaged in fattening) and butchers. Livestock marketing between regional and terminal marketsMajor regional markets in Isiolo county include Oldonyilo and Isiolo livestock markets. At the time of this study the Oldonyilo market had been modernised with the funding by the USAID through Regal IR while the construction of the facility in Isiolo was nearing completion. Animals delivered in the two regional markets come from both Isiolo county and other neighbouring counties. In Isiolo market for example, some of the animals come from Marsabit (small ruminants), Saburu, (mainly camels and cattle), Wajir and Ethiopia (mainly cattle). Most livestock buyers in the two regional markets are traders who come from Nairobi, Meru and Central Kenya among other areas. Again, the transactions between buyers and sellers in regional markets are often ad-hoc one-time relationships.About 66% of the traders who sold animals in the regional markets and over 80% of those who purchased the animals said that the transactions were mediated by brokers. Again, for animals sold in regional markets, nutritional status was the most frequently cited factor (all the 13 traders interviewed) that was said to influence the decisions by traders on whether to buy and/or the price to offer. While many of the animals in regional markets are for slaughter, some buyers in these markets buy animals for fattening. Essentially, some buyers purchase animals at low prices during the drought season which they go and fatten for resale latter at a higher price. It was also noted that local butchers and hotel operators in towns where the regional markets are located buy a significant number of animals for slaughter. In Isiolo, some butchers buy and slaughter camels and then process the meat into Nyirinyiri some of which is sold in Nairobi.Marketing costs between livestock markets in Isiolo and final markets in neighbouring counties and/or Nairobi include transport charges, government taxes, brokerage fees in the sales markets and other incidentals such as accommodation and meals. Table 10 which presents an analysis of gross margins for different types of traders also shows the marketing costs (KES/animal) incurred. Surprisingly, the transportation costs for small ruminants to neighbouring counties were higher than the transportation costs to Nairobi which probably reflects the effects of bad roads connection with some of the markets in the neighbouring Counties such as Maua. (Brokerage charges are also incurred in terminal markets).Table 10 presents an analysis of gross margins for different categories of traders in the Isiolo live animals marketing chain. The estimated costs and revenues are based on information about the most recently completed buying and selling operations. Although the estimates may be rather imprecise due to the limited number of traders interviewed, they nevertheless provide useful insight about the financial performance of the traders in the value chain. While the margins enjoyed by traders are thin, the level varies across the different categories of traders. Traders who bought and sold animals in same market realised the lowest level of margins of less KES200 per small ruminant which represents about 3% of their total variable expenditure. In comparison, traders who delivered animals to regional markets realised a margin of about KES330-500 per small ruminant and nearly KES900 per head of cattle which represents about 5-11% of their total variable expenses. Goats traders who sold animals in Nairobi enjoyed the highest level of margins KES1,220 which is about 29% of their variable expenses. As already indicated, settlement centres and towns in Isiolo also act as outlets for meat animals produced and/or marketed in the county. Among the local communities, women are strongly involved in the meat retail business representing most (57%) of the 14 meat sellers interviewed during this study. All the meat sellers quizzed traded in either mutton and/or goat meat while only a few dealt in beef (5) and/or camel meat (only 1). The high frequency of butchers who sell mutton and /or goat meat perhaps reflect a higher preference for these two types of meat compared to beef and camel meat among the local consumers. In addition, meat goats and sheep may be more readily available as the two species comprise a big part of livestock herds in the county and are also more prolific than cattle and camel. Usually, meat sellers purchase animals (as opposed to animal carcasses) which they slaughter in nearby slaughter slabs or in their butcheries and then sell as meat.The number of animals slaughtered vary across locations from several sheep and/or goats per day in a single butchery in big towns like Isiolo to butchers who slaughter animals and sell meat only a few times in a week in settlements in remote areas. Surprisingly, while goats often cost more than sheep (on average KES4,500 compared to KES3,000 per mature animal at the time of this survey) both mutton and goat meat retail at the same price perhaps because goats purchased for slaughter were often said to weigh more (estimated mean carcass weight=14.5kg) compared to 10.4kg for sheep). Essentially, butchers seemed indifferent on which type of small ruminant (goat or sheep) they slaughtered for sale. The retail prices for sheep and goat meat however varied with location raging from KES280 per kg in centres and villages in remote locations to KES400 in big urban centres.As is common in buying and selling of livestock in the study region, purchasing of slaughter stocks by butchers also often (about 70% of cases) featured a broker. The fees paid to brokers ranged from KES50-300 for a sheep or a goat and KES250-500 per head of cattle or camel. Frequently, due to the poor quality of animals slaughtered, the meat offered for sale in many outlets tends to be of low quality in terms of attributes such as tenderness and intramuscular fat quantity (marbling). For instance, in 70% of cases of animals recently purchased for slaughter among the butchers interviewed, the stock included uncastrated mature males and/or mature females which usually yields tough meat especially during the dry season when pasture is scarce and animal bodies are therefore not in top condition.While the largest share of the red meat market in Kenya is for low quality meat, information collected in some towns where livestock from northern Kenya are marketed showed that some butcheries are emerging that are striving to leverage on sale of quality meat to be financially more competitive. In Nanyuki for instance, a number of meat eatery joints were identified where operators only targeted for slaughter young well-nourished cattle including both steers and cull cows. The operators explained that cooked or roasted meat from such animals tends to be tender and good tasting which are attributes that are highly favoured by customers. To meet their customers' needs, the meat eatery joints' operators mainly procure slaughter animals from ranches in Laikipia. Due to better husbandry practices in ranches, the quality of meat from the ranch animals was said to be better than slaughter stocks procured directly from pastoralists. Purchase of slaughter animals from pastoral systems only happens when animals are in top condition.For cattle purchased from ranches by the operators of the quality conscious meat joints, prices paid are based on live weight. At the time of this study the price for cattle had just risen to KES170 from KES140 per kg of live weight a few weeks before. At the previous price of KES140 per kg of live weight, a 350-kg animal would cost KES49,000. Interestingly, this is equivalent to the highest price received for a mature uncastrated bull among the surveyed pastoral producers who had sold animals during the past one year. The lowest price received by the pastoralist for a mature bull was KES15,000 while the average was about KES23,000. For pastoral producers and traders who can be able to service this emerging quality conscious segment of the livestock market there would be a significant improvement in income received.Meat retail shops were also identified that are striving to leverage on sale of high quality meat to be competitive numerous other towns including Nyeri, Kenol and Thika. In the three towns however, the interviewed operators procured their meat supplies in the form of carcasses delivered to their shops by meat wholesalers. In the case of goats, young animals weighing about 13kg carcass weight are preferred. Surprisingly, the butchers expressed no desire to procure animals from production areas citing risks including insecurity, high prices due to involvement of brokers, government red tape among others.As noted by the operators of the quality conscious butcheries, a major limitation for pastoralists is the poor quality of the animals they sell. Nevertheless, while trying to enhance the level of prices from livestock sales among pastoralists it is useful explore ways which could enable their access to this market segment. Essentially, it may be easier for animal sellers from pastoral areas to satisfy the quality requirements of this market segment compared to selling to the very highend butcheries and meat exporting firms. Perhaps a good strategy would be for the pastoral producers and traders to target to sell selected young animals when they are in top condition to this emerging market segment. The most appropriate time would probably be after the rains when feed is readily available, and the body condition of animals is excellent. Selling such a strategy to pastoralists may however be difficult. A good approach might be to first pilot the strategy with a limited group of pastoralists.The performance of a value chain is to a large extent influenced by the environment within which the chain is immersed. The operating environment in the context of a value chain includes prevailing policy, legal and regulatory frameworks that guide business investments and operations in the region of interest. It also includes social cultural, political, economic and physical environments in the region. Physical environment includes not only climatic conditions but also business support infrastructure such as roads, energy, water, communication and market facilities among others. A series of recent studies on livestock value chains in northern Kenya commissioned by Regal-IR present an analysis of the policy and legal frameworks within which livestock production and marketing in the ASAL areas in Kenya take place (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015a, b, c).Important policies on the livestock sector include ' Gaps in policy and legal framework:• Absence of an entity to champion, regulate, develop and promote the meat industry is what is stopping from tapping into all the possibilities• Livestock development policy• Sale yard bill.Like everywhere else in Kenya, delivery of livestock health inputs and services in Isiolo is a joint responsibility of both the public and private sector. Under the devolved system of government, the responsibilities of the county veterinary department include: surveillance and control of notifiable livestock diseases; meat inspection; regulation of livestock movement through issuance of movement permits and; monitoring and regulation of the private animal health sector. Again, just as is the case in other counties in northern and northeastern Kenya, the public animal health sector in Isiolo, either on its own or in conjunction with donor organizations, is often involved in delivery of animal health inputs and/or services to livestock producers. Beneficiaries in many of these cases are not charged for the inputs and services which are usually treated as a form of aid.Numerous challenges undermine the capacity of the Isiolo county veterinary department to perform its functions including inadequate staffing and lack of facilitation. At the time of this survey, the entire department had a total of only 16 technical staff, most (11) of whom were based in Isiolo (either at the county or sub-county headquarters) while the other two remaining subcounties (Galbatulla and Merti) were being served by only five staff (three and two respectively). Also, the department often relies on borrowing of vehicles (as all their vehicles are grounded) and/ or donor support for and other facilitation to enable their staff to move and work in the field. On staffing, the department urgently needs about four additional lab technicians and 12 diploma-level animal health assistants (AHAs).Information from the veterinary department showed that the most common livestock diseases in Isiolo county include: lumpy skin disease and FMD for cattle; PPR, CCPP and sheep and goat pox for small ruminants, and; camel pox, trypanosomiasis and haemorrhagic septicaemia for camels.Vaccines for most of these diseases have been developed and can be used to mitigate economic losses that are often occasioned by outbreaks.The private vet inputs and services sector comprises of private practitioners and agro-veterinarian shop operators. There is a total of about 14 only agro-veterinarian shops in the entire county and this was deemed inadequate. Sidai Africa which started operating in the county in 2013 has a franchise of eight contracted outlets (Oldonyiro, Buresa, Merti, Biriqo, Kinna, Galba Tulla, Sericho and Galfasa) and was estimated to be covering about 60% of the market for animal health inputs. While sales by Sidai have been rising rapidly, government officials and other key informants interviewed conceded that the private vet inputs and services sector is not yet well developed in the county which was blamed on factors including poorly developed road and communication infrastructure, harsh climatic conditions, vastness of the area, insecurity, and lack of interest among students from the local communities to pursue animal health courses in colleges among others.As a result of the gap left by the poorly developed private animal health input and service sector, numerous complications arise. First, to fill this gap, some general shop operators stock and sell vet inputs and drugs alongside other commodities including food meant for human consumption which not only poses health risks to customers but is also in contravention of the official government policy. This illegitimate sale of vet drugs and inputs also gives room to sale of counterfeits which was cited to be a common problem in the county by Sidai officials.The problem of counterfeits was particularly said to be serious in the case of acaricides with the most preferred products by producers consisting of higher concentrations of active ingredient than is officially recommended in Kenya. Similar complaints were also received in the case of other drugs. Allegedly, livestock producers who often treat their own animals complain that some of the officially recommended drugs are ineffective. Given the public health implication of misuse of drugs, there is need to investigate the allegations by livestock producers to ensure that prevailing official vet drugs recommendations are appropriate for the region. The situation also underscores a need to strengthen the enforcement capacity of veterinary department and other regulatory institutions in the vet input sector.Second, while most of the common diseases in the county can be controlled through vaccination, uptake of vaccines is also low due to factors including: unavailability of skilled/competent personnel as many of the Sidai agro-veterinarian shops are manned by persons who are unqualified to administer vaccines; free vaccines provided by government and donors hence unwillingness to pay for these inputs by livestock producers and also; lack of knowledge among the livestock keepers on how these inputs work with many pastoralists being wary about the reactions and side effects that the vaccines usually have on animals.A key prerequisite in promoting commercialization of the livestock sector is development of transparent and competitive markets. The theory of competition assumes perfect information among both buyers and sellers. Results from a survey of livestock producers during this study, however, showed that the majority were often uninformed about prevailing prices (about 60%) and the desired quality by buyers (76%) in livestock markets where they sell their animals. Among those who claimed to be informed about market conditions, most (88%) cited other livestock producers who have recently visited the market as their source of information. An important challenge about 'other livestock producers' as a source of market information is that messages passed across may not be fully accurate or up to date.Essentially, the widespread lack of awareness about prevailing market conditions among livestock producers partly accounts for the pervasive presence of livestock brokers in livestock markets and the attendant high in transaction costs that impedes market development. It is also important to note that besides livestock producers, buyers also need information on prevailing market conditions.During key informant interviews, some buyers from Nairobi explained that they go out of their way to search for information on availability of animals and prices in livestock markets before they visit to procure animals. Some of these buyers have developed long term business relationships with some brokers whom they call for updates about the prevailing conditions in markets.It is important to note that there have been initiatives to set up livestock market information systems in pastoral areas in Kenya in the past. An example of these initiatives is the National Market Information System developed and operated by LINKS in conjunction with the Ministry of Livestock and KLMC and which is now dysfunctional. The problem with such project funded initiatives is that sustainability tends to be a challenge when the sponsoring project ends. A potential way of mitigating this drawback is designing an information system that allows for entry and exit of sponsors with minimal disruptions and which should be hosted at a government ministry or an organization such as KLMC. Such a system could work closely with the LMAs in charge of managing livestock markets which could be used to collect the required market information for dissemination. However, as a stop gap measure before the setting up of the market information system, LMAs could be used to gather market information and disseminate it through billboards elected in livestock markets. The LINKs project used to display market information in Garissa and other livestock markets on breed, class and kind of the animal. While such an information system had the potential to increase pastoralists' market participation and improve service delivery to value chain actors (Mude 2016), sustainability was a big challenge (Weber et al. 2005).As is common among nomadic pastoralists in Kenya, most livestock producers in Isiolo are largely not market oriented. Rather majority of the producers treat their animals as a store of wealth. Consequently, in many cases producers only sell animals when there is a need for cash in the household. Data from surveyed households during this study shows the number of animals sold during the last 12 months stood at about seven goats, as well as sheep and less than one camel and cattle. These levels of offtake through sales represent 9-26% of animal herds kept.Common reasons why livestock are sold among producers include the need for money to pay school fees, hospital bills, purchase food among others. Animals are sold as need arises and thus the number sold each time is usually small. For this reason and particularly in the case of small ruminants the point of sale often tends to be bush/feeder markets (90% of cases) where prices tend to be lower than in bigger markets such as Isiolo and Oldonyiro. For instance, a goat with a live weight of 16 kg fetches about KES5,000 in the bush markets compared to KES6,500 in the Isiolo market. By the same token, a 30-35kg goat commonly fetches about KES7,000 in the bush market compared to KES8,000-8,500 in the Isiolo markets.A possible way to ensure that producers located far away from big markets get higher prices for their animals is to encourage collective marketing to attain the volumes needed to cover the costs of delivery to the larger distant markets. Where possible this strategy may be integrated with internet marketing which is increasingly gaining popularity in Kenya and which has the potential of allowing producers to negotiate terms with buyers on a one on one basis.A common phenomenon in livestock marketing in Isiolo is that many transactions are mediated by brokers. This study attempted to unravel why brokers are so pervasive in livestock markets in the county. One of the roles of brokers in livestock marketing is handling of some of the logistics. It was reported that there are cases where sellers contact and send animals to brokers while still at home ahead of their travel to the market. In such cases the broker takes charge when the animals arrive in the market and oversees the offloading, feeding, and security among others. The broker would indemnify the livestock producer if an animal is stolen during this time. The producer appears only during the market day but does not take part in the negotiations. The manners in which brokers conduct negotiations between buyers and sellers are such that the two parties do not come into direct contact with each other. While there are standard brokerage fees (KES100 per head of cattle), brokers during negotiations secretly inflate asking prices by sellers and understate the offered prices by the buyer in an effort and then pockets the difference when a deal is eventually agreed and this can be hefty. This practice (malpractice) is a major cause of discontent against brokers by buyers and sellers. Worse for sellers, brokers can conspire to ensure that they do not get any buyers by feeding the wrong information to the buyers including claims that the animals being sold are either stolen or are coming from an area where there has been a disease outbreak. Other roles performed by livestock brokers include facilitating communication between buyers and sellers in cases where they do not speak the same language and acting as a guarantor to buyers that the animals being offered have not been stolen. On the balance however, the activities of brokers serve to increase transaction costs in livestock marketing in Isiolo which acts as a disincentive for buyers to visit markets there and discourage buyers from participating in markets. Because of the exploitative behaviour of brokers, there is need to regulate their activities. Actors surveyed longed for the enactment of the pending sale yard bill which provides for the regulation of brokers. For the AVCD-LC, it is important to support the implementation of the bill once it is it has been signed into law.As already indicated, selling of livestock among pastoralists is needs driven. When pastoralists deliver animals for sale in livestock markets, they often also take that opportunity to procure any items or services that they require. Emergence of vibrant alternative businesses around livestock markets should therefore be encouraged and supported to ensure availability of a wide range of commodities and services as this not only serves to generate jobs but also helps to make the market a more attractive point of selling livestock for livestock producers. Such alternative businesses include food, clothes, and veterinary and agro-inputs businesses. A common constraint faced business operators is poor management which limits performance. AVCD-LC can assist by linking the business operators to BDS services as a way of ensuring that the emerging businesses are well run and vibrant.In Ondonyilo, lack of banking services was identified as a challenge. AVCD-LC could support the establishment of banking and M-Pesa agents. This may however require the project to lobby mobile phone companies for an upgrade of the cell phone network in the area. It was also observed that in the market buyers buy animals of different sizes and weight. It might be good for the project to pilot an animal weighing service with either the LMA there or a youth group so that there is more objectivity when negotiating prices among buyers and sellers.The almost finished export abattoir close to Isiolo town will create direct and indirect jobs. Direct jobs will include skilled (flayers, manager, lab technicians, etc.) and unskilled workers (guards, cleaners, loaders/unloaders, etc.). It will also boost the demand for hides and skins and involve different value chain actors, like collectors, wholesalers, tanners, etc. The indirect jobs will include transportation of animals and of humans, fodder selling, catering, etc.Close to Isiolo town and nearby the new not-yet finished export-abattoir, there is a big fodder production land managed by the community. The facilities also including a hay/fodder store.The interesting point is that the fodder land is also very close (less than 100 m) to a recently constructed feed lot which is also very close to the export abattoir. This agglomeration of fodder production, livestock fattening/finishing and livestock processing activities will create, once the abattoir is functional, a hub of economic activities and a demand for additional services like transport, catering, mobile battery recharging, airtime buying, etc. where women and youth could be involved in.Fodder production, conservation and marketing enterprises are yet to gain strength in many parts of Isiolo county. There are however efforts by both government and donor organizations to promote fodder enterprises in areas with relatively high amounts of rainfall and near rivers where irrigation is possible. Around Isiolo town, fodder activities are more vibrant due to favorable climate conditions and high demand from some farmers who practice dairy. Other areas where efforts to promote fodder enterprise have been initiated and some fodder production is taking place include Garba Tulla, Rapsu, Kinna, Maili tano, Guba dhudha, livestock marketing division, and the region along the Isiolo River.While dissemination of the fodder technologies is mainly being undertaken through groups, individual farmers form the majority of producers. Many of these individual producers are rather small-scale operators who conduct their fodder production activities in plots of up to one acre. Types of crops planted and utilized as fodder include maize stover, beans straw and Napier which are most common in agro-pastoral areas where farmers practice dairy. Other types of fodder include natural grasses, fodder trees such as leucaena and acacia whose seeds are utilized as goats feed.The strategy used by producers involved in fodder production using natural grasses simply involves electing fences around plots where they want to establish fodder and letting the grass grow without being grazed. None of the fodder grass producers interviewed uses fodder seeds and reasons cited included unavailability, lack of knowledge about how to plant and previous experience where seeds failed to germinate after planting due to lack of rain. No labour or costs are also incurred to perform other husbandry practices such as land preparation, planting and weeding. However, where such plots are located near a river, irrigation is sometimes also done. Around Isiolo town many of the fodder producers who cultivate grass do not bail it after harvesting.Farmers who produce fodder either use it to feed their own animals while some is sold. While marketing is not a big challenge for fodder producers near Isiolo town, their counterparts in distant places such as Galbatulla complained that they were stranded with stocks of hay which they could not sell due to lack of buyers. One challenge for fodder producers who lack market is that often the volumes of fodder involved are rather small to attract buyers. For such producers it may be better to introduce a slightly longer-term business view of the fodder activities. This includes educating the producers that they do not need to sell their fodder immediately after harvesting. Rather, during the rainy season, they should concentrate on production and storing of fodder to accumulate large volumes to sell during the dry season when demand is high. This should be accompanied by capacity building on fodder storage including introduction of simple technologies such as manual bailers.Around Isiolo town, many fodder producers who cultivate grass often sell it as standing pasture for grazing. Their customers mainly include livestock traders delivering animals in Isiolo market or en route to other markets some of whom come from Moyale and Samburu. An acre of standing pasture grass costs about KES10,000 and can be grazed by about 50 heads of cattle for about a week. The price may however vary depending on the quality of pasture establishment. The main issues that buyers consider when renting such grazing pasture plots include the quality of establishment of grass (the thicker the better as it can be grazed for long), and accessibility and proximity from Isiolo town.As a pointer to the high demand for fodder around Isiolo town, some fodder plots hired for grazing are booked up to two months in advance and some traders' rent up to five separate plots that are close together. While doing the booking, the traders usually give a down payment of up to a half the total cost. To pre-empt any possible future disputes, such transactions involve witnesses and written agreements. The terms of such agreements include the number of days the peace of land is going to be used for grazing as some tenants may be tempted to take very long. Disagreements may also arise from the buyer claiming that animals are being lost and so land lords are forced to keep data on the tally of animals sold by the tenant each day.This study identified numerous factors that undermine the development of the fodder value chain in Isiolo county. The impediments include cultural beliefs among the local community that discourage fodder production. While these may take long to change, a sustained campaign is needed to address the situation. Fodder producers located far from high demand centres are not well linked to fodder markets and there is therefore a need to work on a business model that can effectively address this challenge. Lack of water was cited as an important constraint. Given the huge investments that are required to address this constraint it is perhaps better for AVCD-LC to target promotion of fodder production in areas where water is available. It was noted that, to a great extent, many fodder producers lack knowledge on a myriad of issues includingTable 12 summarizes a selection of best-bet interventions that could be implemented in Isiolo county through AVCD-LC project activities and in collaboration with different partners. The scoring of these interventions is reported in Table 13. Scores were allocated in a range from 1 (low) to 5 (high) for the 'positive' attributes. For the 'negative' attributes related to risk assessment a negative sign was added to the score. An overall score was then computed as the total sum of these individual scores. We opted to provide equal weight to each attribute. A total of four possible interventions were identified: i. Fine tuning the business model for fodder grass producers through participatory knowledge sharing platforms; ii. Development and implementation of a livestock market information system (LIMS); iii. Development and implementation of a livestock grading system; and iv. Supporting the co-management model and upgrading the LMAs.The development and implementation of livestock grading scheme is ranked first, followed by the support of the co-management model, and then the fine tuning of the business model for fodder grass producers through participatory knowledge sharing platforms. Livestock keeping is the main economic activity with limited crop production. There are no registered group or company ranches, however different communities have their own grazing areas resulting to resource based conflicts especially in drought season where community competes for grazing fields. This also results in environmental degradation mainly due to deforestation and forest encroachment. In addition, the county has high potential for a number of mineral deposits. Some mining and open cast quarrying activities of blue Quamline, mica, chromite and sand harvesting is being done in various parts of the county. Exploration of petroleum is also on-going at Maikona, Laisamis and Kargi.The county has two towns: Moyale and Marsabit and three urban centres: Sololo, Loiyangalani and Laisamis with the main traded goods being: livestock, fruits, vegetables, maize, beans, wheat, teff and millets. Most of the maize and beans comes from other counties, whereas some fruits and vegetables come from Ethiopia through Moyale. There are also some co-operatives societies in the county which are not very vibrant. Most of these cooperatives are involved in marketing livestock products. There are also about 480 self-help groups, most of them are involved in social economic activities like goat keeping, bee keeping, poultry rearing and small micro enterprises.The road network in the county is poorly developed with a road network of 2,431 km of which 397 km are gravel and 2,034 km are of earth surface. These roads are prone to erosion and are rendered impassable during the rainy seasons leading to high transportation costs. The poor state of roads has led to limited cross border trade and provision of essential services such as health, education, security and extensions services.This analysis focuses on cattle, camel, sheep and goats produced and marketed for meat and which are also the primary focus of the AVCD-LC project. Again, in line with the common practice in value chain studies, the analysis presents information on themes including: (i) core activities in the value chain; (ii) network of partners supplying services and inputs to the main value chain actors; (iii) co-ordination and governance in the chain; (iv) operating environment; and (v) opportunity for upgrading.The core processes in the Marsabit livestock value chain include livestock production; livestock trading; animal slaughter; meat marketing; and ultimately meat consumption. In correspondence, the main actors in the value chain include livestock producers; livestock traders including both small and large-scale traders; abattoir operators; meat wholesalers; meat retailers; and eventually consumers.Cattle, camel, sheep and goats are the main animal species reared by livestock producers in Marsabit county. While the predominant system of livestock production is nomadic pastoralism, livestock producers around Marsabit, Sololo and Moyale towns also practice crop farming especially maize. In these crop-livestock systems, crop residues including maize stover and beans straw are commonly utilized as fodder. Around Marsabit town where milk prices tend to be high (KES100-120 per litre) some producers practice dairying with exotic animals. Planted fodder and residues from crop farming activities are commonly utilized as feed for the dairy animals.It is estimated that Marsabit county has a total population of 424,600 heads of cattle, 960,000 sheep, 1,143,500 goats and 203,300 camels (county government of Marsabit 2013). Data collected during this study show that a relatively higher frequency of households are engaged in the rearing of sheep and goats (76% and 92% of households, respectively) compared to cattle and camel (61% and 47% of the households, respectively). Table 14 With nomadic pastoralism being the dominant system of livestock production, pasture in communal land was the most frequently cited source of animal feed (88-98% of the surveyed households) (Table 15). Nevertheless, use of own produced fodder (crop residues and fodder crops) and purchased fodder were also documented particularly in places where arable farming was prevalent. The use of own produced feeds, purchased fodder and fodder collected from public land was relatively more frequent in cattle rearing (22-50% of households) than in the rearing of shoats (12-27% of households) and camels (only 3-20% of households). The use of commercial feeds was documented in a few households (9-13%) but this was confined to households near Marsabit town and Moyale that practiced dairy farming. Given the importance of animal grazing in communal land as a source of livestock feed, the increasing rangeland degradation due to overgrazing presents a major challenge to livestock activities and people's livelihoods in Marsabit county. The size of livestock herds held by producers is influenced by the levels of inflows and outflows into and from the herds that take place through time. The main ways in which the stocks of animals held by producers accumulate include birth, purchase, gifts and exchange (Table 16). Over the past 12 months prior to this study, births accounted for largest proportion (74-86% depending on species) of the total inflows. During the period, only a handful of the surveyed producers (about 3-9% depending on animal species) purchased some livestock. Often, young females accounted for the largest proportion of the animals purchased (100% of the camels, 62% of the cattle and 47% of sheep) followed by male entire (66% of goats, 31% of cattle and 12% of sheep) (Figure 8). Reasons why animals were purchased included increase in stock (about 60-100% of cases), breed improvement (up to 30% of cases) and fattening (only up to 10% of cases) (Table 17). The increase in herd sizes through inflows is balanced by outflows through death, sale, slaughter, exchange and predation among others (Table 18). Levels of outflow in the past 12 months indicated that deaths and sales account for most of the animals that exited from the herds. Surprisingly, a comparison of the two main types of outflows indicated that exits through death surpassed exits through sales. Specifically, loss of animals through death averaged 4.12 sheep, 2.54 goats, 1.41 heads of cattle and 0.46 camels per household. In comparison, the number of animals sold averaged 3.3 goats, 1.86 sheep, 1.24 heads of cattle and just 0.34 camels per household. Note that the apparent low offtake rate for camels remained evident when fractions of livestock keepers that had sold animals were compared across species. Essentially, sale of camels was recorded in only 23% of households with this livestock species compared to 41% for cattle and 38% and 58% for sheep and goats, respectively. It is also worth noting that the documented average numbers of animals sold during this study represents offtake rates of 12%, 7%, 11% and 5% for goat, sheep, cattle and camel herds/flocks, respectively. These offtake rates compare well with the rates reported by Nyariki et al (2005) for the Kenyan arid lands. In the current study, mature male animals account for the largest percentage of the animals sold (60-about 90%) (Figure 9). In addition, most of the mature male camels, goats and sheep sold (90%, 82% and 62%, respectively) were said to have been castrated suggesting a high prevalence rate of this desirable animal breeding control practice among the communities in the study area. It is also important to note that livestock production among the local communities in Marsabit is generally not commercial oriented, with keeping of many herds being envied as a source of cultural pride. Selling of animals is in many cases only done when there is need for cash. Use of improved inputs and technologies in agriculture and livestock production has implications on productivity, quality and safety of products produced which ultimately influences the economic performance of the producers. For this reason, this study also sought to take stock of inputs and technology use among animal producers in the study area. The set of important inputs and services in livestock production relate to feeds, animal health and breeding. A recent development in the Kenyan livestock industry has also seen attempts to introduce livestock insurance services to producers in pastoral areas to mitigate the risk of losses usually occasioned by drought.Nearly all the producers interviewed said that deworming, tick control and curative animal health inputs and services were available in their localities and that they used them. Vaccination services were however less frequently used (66% of producers) with nearly 30% of the producers lamenting that the services were unavailable. While most frequently (53% of households) treatment of sick animals was performed by the producer himself or a neighbour with some advice from a qualified professional, in 25% of the cases the owner or a neighbour performed the treatment without any professional advice. An important challenge when people treat their own animals is that there is potential for misuse of drugs by ignorant livestock producers. Particularly in the treatment of camels, it was said that producers frequently administered Amoxicillin which was said to remedy various diseases but which some professionals feared could lead to development of resistance against the drug either in animals or people. While mineral supplementation was documented in most (70%) households, 30% of the producers did not with some saying that their grazing plans include moving animals to take advantage of naturally occurring minerals in some places in the county for mineral supplementation. Some 41% of the producers had bought and fed hay to their animals during the past one year. Due to frequent incidences of drought 47% of the producers said that they conserved feed for their livestock. Forms in which the feeds were conserved included standing pasture (37% of cases) and bailed and un-bailed hay (37% and 32% of cases, respectively). Adoption of the recently introduced IBLI product was documented in only 8% of households. Most of the cattle keepers (82%) used own bull for breeding which presents a high probability for inbreeding.The various key informants gave their opinions on challenges facing livestock production in Marsabit. Issues cited included prolonged and recurrent droughts, rangeland degradation, insecurity due to cattle rustling and conflict over pasture with neighbouring communities, livestock diseases and pests, a lack of market and a lack of extension information. The importance of these challenges was confirmed during the formal survey. Challenges that were the most frequently cited during the survey include drought, livestock diseases, insecurity and poor prices (53%, 33%, 20% and 20% of producers, respectively).As in other counties in northern Kenya, the livestock marketing system in Marsabit features both the marketing of animals by livestock producers and the buying and selling of animals by livestock traders. During the marketing process, animals move from primary to regional markets and eventually to terminal markets where they are sold for slaughter. Before reaching the terminal markets, an animal may change hands several times. The new livestock market in Moyale town constructed by Regal AG with support from USAID was just about to commence operation at the time of this study. Some of the key informants interviewed however observed that a significant amount of livestock trading in Moyale market has moved across to the Ethiopian the side of the border. This shifting was largely attributed to insecurity due to ethnic conflict between the communities (Garbra and Borana) inhabiting the area in Kenya. Nevertheless, a lot of livestock trading still takes place on the Kenyan side of the border fuelled by external traders from major towns in Kenya and buyers from Ethiopia who frequent the town. It was estimated that about three lorries of cattle (60 animals), two of lorries camels (30 animals) and over 150 shoats left Moyale for Nairobi daily and that an average of 500 animals are supplied to the Moyale market daily. In addition, Moyale was cited as an important exit point for camels exported from Kenya to Ethiopia where the animals are again exported to the Middle East.The thriving cross border livestock trade between Kenya and Ethiopia is not restricted to Moyale and was also documented in Dukana and Forore where buyers from Ethiopia who frequented these areas were purchasing sheep on weight basis (KES100/kg live weight). Young animals weighing 16-30kg on live weight basis were preferred by these Ethiopian buyers leaving the more mature animals which are directed to buyers servicing the Kenyan meat market.Other traders from Ethiopia purchase young bulls (up to 3 years old weighing 260-280 kg) which they sell to feedlots in their country. Some of the animals exported to Ethiopia are reexported alive to the Middle East while others are slaughtered, and the meat is exported. Owing to this cross-border trade with Ethiopia, the demand for small ruminants in Marsabit tends to be high on the time around the Haji season due to the high demand in Saudi Arabia where some of these animals are ultimately exported. Besides animal exports from Kenya to Ethiopia the crossborder livestock trade between the two countries also feature traders who import female cattle from Ethiopia to Kenya some of which eventually ends up in Nairobi and other terminal markets in the country.Livestock producers have several outlets where they sell animals including farm gate, bush/village/ feeder markets, and the often far away regional markets such as Melile, Marsabit and Moyale. Prices in regional markets generally tend to be higher than in bush markets. For example, at the time of this study prices for typical mature slaughter animals in bush markets were reported as about KES6,000 per goat, KES2,700 per sheep, KES28,000 per head of cattle and KES45,000 per camel. In comparison in Merille market the prices were said to be about KES8,000 per goat, KES3,500 per sheep, KES47,000 per head of cattle and KES80,000 per camel. It should however be noted that marketing costs for many producers may be higher for animals delivered for sale in the often-distant regional markets than in the bush markets due to the high cost of transportation prevalent in arid areas in Kenya.The type of market outlet used by livestock producers often differed with the species of animals sold. Village markets were the most frequently cited point of sale for sheep and goats (43% and 40% of the surveyed producers, respectively) (Table 19). In contrast for cattle and camels, regional markets were the most frequently cited point of sale (74% and 63 of the surveyed producers, respectively). Only 26% and 11% of producers who had sold cattle did so at farm gate and village market, respectively. By the same token, just 13% and 25% of the producers who had sold camels used the 2 types of markets, respectively. This study identified different types of traders depending on point where animals are purchased and where they are sold. The trader types include: (i) small-scale livestock traders who buy animals from producers either in the manyattas or small livestock markets and sell in large markets such as Melile, Marsabit and Moyale; (ii) traders who procure animals in markets in Marsabit county and sell in markets in the neighbouring counties such as Isiolo; (iii) traders in major markets who buy animals during non-market days and then sell them in the same market during the market day; (iv) traders who procure animals in markets in the county and sells in Nairobi and (v) buyers from neighbouring Ethiopia.Typically, traders who operate between bush and regional markets buy and accumulate animals which they deliver for sale once a week in the regional markets. To minimize inventory costs, the numbers of animals purchased are adjusted depending on the prevailing level of demand in the sale market. Sellers from whom the animals are procured in the bush markets are often livestock producers. The transactions between buyers and sellers in the primary markets tend to be ad-hoc one-time relationships. The buyers usually pay cash for animals and the transaction may or may not feature a broker in some markets. Where a broker is involved the official charge is KES20-100 per sheep or goat and KES200-400 per head of cattle. At times the trader can pay brokerage changes both during procurement and again when selling.Livestock sellers in regional markets mainly include traders who procure animals from small markets in the bush and villages, traders in the regional markets who buy animals during non-market days which they accumulate and sell during the market day, and some livestock producers. Buyers mainly include traders who sell animals in market in the neighbouring counties and/or in Nairobi, livestock exporters in the case of Moyale and local butchers and hotel operators. Transactions between buyers and sellers are often mediated by brokers which is attributable to a number of reasons. In some cases, local sellers do not understand Kiswahili-the language commonly spoken by visiting traders-thus necessitating the services of a broker to enable the two parties to communicate and transact. Brokers also help in conflict resolution especially in cases of disputed animal ownership. In addition, some brokers keep regular contact with large buyers with both parties continuously appraising each other about the prevailing conditions in livestock markets in the production areas and the terminal markets in Nairobi. Through this information exchange a trader can minimize the risk of going for animals when market conditions are unfavourable. On his part the broker can keep a royal bunch of clients who are willing to pay some fees for his services. It was observed that in some cases, failure to go through a broker may lead to a buyer paying a higher price for an animal. On the other hand, some producers complained that buyers and brokers often collude to fix prices in livestock markets.Traders who purchase animals in regional markets in Marsabit for sale in markets outside the county including Nairobi incur a myriad of expenses. Table 20 for the case of animals transported from Melile to Nairobi. During purchase the traders pay a brokerage fee of KES200 per head of cattle and KES30 per sheep or goat. Movement permits cost about KES2,000 per head of cattle.A county government cess of KES8,000 and KES5,000 is also levied per a lorry load of cattle and small ruminants, respectively. One lorry carries about 150 sheep/goats and or 18-22 heads of cattle depending on the size of the animals. For security reasons every lorry transporting animals is required to engage police escort between Melille and Isiolo which costs KES4,000. Some further KES8,000 in the case of cattle and KES5,000 in the case of small ruminants are spent on the services of caretakers who ride with the animals during transportation. Payment at police road blocks average about KES3,000 per trip. In livestock markets in Nairobi, the traders pay KES3,000 per lorry of animals to brokers who do the selling on their behalf. In addition, a levy of KES500 per a lorry load of small ruminants and KES200 per a head of cattle is charged for using the market. Using this information together with purchase and sales prices experienced during the last completed transaction, the rate of return among the livestock traders involved was estimated to be between 16% and 18% of their variable expenses.The traders who deliver sheep and goats to Nairobi often purchase and mix together animals of different size and price which they sell wholesale to retail traders who offer an average price per animal in a batch. This mixing together of animals of different size and price was attributed to the fact that these requirements vary among buyers in the terminal markets. The wholesale selling of animals facilitates the trader get rid of the flock of animals delivered to the market much faster than selling individual animals. In turn, the prompt sale of animals helps minimize both the inventory holding costs and the risks associated with holding stocks of animals over an extended period. A major challenge to livestock marketing in Marsabit county is inadequate and poor livestock market facilities which forces producers and traders to travel for long distances to sell or buy animals. This not only makes the process of livestock marketing expensive, but also leads to loss of animal condition and hence value during transportation. Even where market facilities exist, they are not well run or organized such as is the case for Kalacha, Songa, Karare, Forolle and Marsabit livestock markets which have no market days. Melile market (best running) is however an exception and provides an example of what can be done to ensure more vibrancy in livestock markets in Marsabit county. In Melile the running of the livestock market is delegated to a LMA comprising elected representatives for various stakeholders involved in livestock production and marketing among the local pastoral communities that use the market. The tasks of the LMA include revenue collection, protection and maintenance of the infrastructure in the livestock market, ensuring security for buyers and sellers and conflict resolution. Under a signed revenue sharing agreement with the county government the money collected is divided between the LMA (40%) and county government (60%). The share that goes to the LMA is used in the running and maintenance of the livestock market.Other challenges to livestock marketing in Marsabit include low supply of animals in livestock markets, poor quality of animals especially during drought, brokers who sometimes exploit livestock sellers and buyers, lack of market information among sellers and buyers, lack of feed and water supply in livestock markets which leads to loss of animal body condition hence value, insecurity with buyers and sellers occasionally loosing animals or money to rustlers and thieves, transboundary diseases which occasion livestock movement burns. Note that some of these constraints can be addressed at least to a certain degree if the running of the livestock markets was improved as is the case of Melile. For instance, supply of animals may increase in well running markets. Likewise, supply of water and other services may improve if became more vibrant.Settlement centres and towns in Marsabit county also act as outlets for meat animals produced and/or marketed in the county. Among the local communities, women are strongly involved in the meat retail business representing 40% of the 10 meat sellers interviewed during this study. Most of the meat sellers quizzed traded in either mutton (60%) and/or goat meat (100%) while only 1 dealt in beef and none for camel meat. The high frequency of butchers who sell mutton and /or goat meat perhaps reflect a higher preference of these two types of meat compared to beef and camel meat among the local communities. In addition, meat goats and sheep may be more readily available as the two species comprise a big part of livestock herds in the county and are also more prolific than cattle and camel. The local meat sellers in the county usually purchase animals (as opposed to animal carcasses) which they slaughter in their butcheries (six of the butchers interviewed) or in nearby slaughter slabs (four butchers) and then sell as meat.The number of animals slaughtered vary across locations from several sheep and/or goats per day in a single butchery in relatively bigger towns like Moyale and Marsabit to butchers who slaughter animals and sell meat only once in a week in settlements in remote areas. Surprisingly, while goats often cost more than sheep (on average KES6,000 compared to KES4,500 per mature male but the two types of meat retailed at the same price (about KES390 per kg). As is common in buying and selling of livestock in the study region, purchasing of slaughter stocks by butchers also often (about 80% of cases) featured a broker. The fees paid to brokers ranged from KES30 to 200 for a sheep or a goat and KES500 per head of cattle.Based on types of animals slaughtered, the meat offered for sale in many outlets can be categorized as being of relatively low quality. Specifically, in about 60% of cases of animals recently purchased for slaughter, the stocks included old or uncastrated mature males and/or mature females which usually yields tough meat especially during the dry season when pasture is scarce and animal bodies are therefore not in top condition.While the largest share of the red meat market in Kenya is for low quality meat, information collected in some towns where livestock from northern Kenya are marketed showed that some butcheries are emerging that are striving to leverage on sale of quality meat to be financially more competitive. In Nanyuki for instance, a number of meat eatery joints were identified where operators only targeted for slaughter young well-nourished cattle including both steers and cull cows. The operators explained that cooked or roasted meat from such animals tends to be tender and good tasting which are attributes that are highly favoured by customers. To meet their customers' needs, the meat eatery joints' operators mainly procure slaughter animals from ranches in Laikipia. Due to better husbandry practices in ranches, the quality of meat from the ranch animals was said to be better than slaughter stocks procured directly from pastoralists. Purchase of slaughter animals from pastoral systems only happens when animals are in top condition.For cattle purchased from ranches by the operators of the quality conscious meat joints, prices paid are based on live weight. At the time of this study the price for cattle had just risen to KES170 from KES140 per kg of live weight a few weeks before. At the previous price of KES140 per kg of live weight, a 350kg animal would cost KES49,000. Interestingly, this is equivalent to the highest price received for a mature uncastrated bull among the surveyed pastoral producers who had sold animals during the past one year. The lowest price received by the pastoralist for a mature bull was KES15,000 while the average was about KES23,000. For pastoral producers and traders who can be able to service this emerging quality conscious segment of the livestock market there would be a significant improvement in income received.Meat retail shops were also identified that are striving to leverage on sale of high quality meat to be competitive numerous other towns including Nyeri, Kenol and Thika. In the three towns however, the interviewed operators procured their meat supplies in the form of carcasses delivered to their shops by meat wholesalers. In the case of goats, young animals weighing about 13 kg carcass weight are preferred. Surprisingly, the butchers expressed no desire to procure animals from production areas citing risks including insecurity, high prices due to involvement of brokers, government red tape among others.As noted by the operators of the quality conscious butcheries, a major limitation for pastoralists is the poor quality of the animals they sell. Nevertheless, while trying to enhance the level of prices from livestock sales among pastoralists it is useful explore ways which could enable their access to this market segment. Essentially, it may be easier for animal sellers from pastoral areas to satisfy the quality requirements of this market segment compared to selling to the very highend butcheries and meat exporting firms. Perhaps a good strategy would be for the pastoral producers and traders to target to sell selected young animals when they are in top condition to this emerging market segment. The most appropriate time would probably be after the rains when feed is readily available and the body condition of animals is excellent. Selling such a strategy to pastoralists may however be difficult. A good approach might be to first pilot the strategy with a limited group of pastoralists.The performance of a value chain is influenced by the environment within which the chain is immersed. The operating environment where value chains operate includes prevailing policy, legal and regulatory frameworks that guide business investments and operations. It also includes social cultural, political, economic and physical setup including climatic conditions, business support infrastructure such as roads, energy, water, communication and market facilities among others.A series of recent studies on livestock value chains in northern Kenya commissioned by Regal IR presents an analysis of the policy and legal frameworks within which livestock production and marketing in the ASAL areas in Kenya take place (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015a, b, c).' A number of policy and regulatory gaps are identifiable in the case of the livestock sector in Marsabit and Kenya in general. First, as observed by (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015a, b, c) the meat and meat animals' trade in Kenya is supposed to be regulated by the Kenya Meat Commission, which is also an actor in the value chain and may therefore present conflicts of interest. There is therefore need for the Government to come up with an independent entity to regulate and promote the meat industry akin to KDB in the dairy sector. Second, while the county governments are responsible for issues on livestock husbandry and marketing in their jurisdictions, some work remains to be done on domestication of the national livestock policies and regulations in Marsabit county. While drafting of a county livestock policy was underway with the support of AHADI at the time of this study, the process of putting in place a county livestock sale yard act which is supposed to govern how livestock marketing is done had not yet commenced.Third, it was also observed that the level of budgetary allocation to the livestock sector by the county government (about 0.2%) is drastically inconsistent with aspirations at national government level which under the Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Programme is committed to allocating at least 10% of the budget to the agriculture sector. This low budgetary allocation undermines provisions of services including animal health and extension which in turn undermines the performance of the livestock sector. Fourth, under the current structure where county veterinary directors' report to chief officers, it was apparent that the veterinary directors' clout in the control of notifiable diseases such as FMD may have suffered. During outbreaks the veterinary officials find it difficult to institute control measures such as animal movement bans due to the huge social economic impacts this has on the local communities occasioning resistance from political leaders. There is therefore need for reforms to ensure local political interference does not compromise efforts in the control of notifiable diseases. This may take the form of having a representative of the national director of veterinary services in the counties for policing purposes.The physical and social cultural environment within which the livestock sector in Marsabit operates are also challenging. A large part of the county is arid and droughts occur regularly.Like the rest of northern Kenya, Marsabit has one of the lowest rates of literacy in Kenya (about 20% according to ADESO 2014) which undermines efforts to initiate positive change in the local communities. Livestock production among the local communities is generally not commercial oriented and ownership of large livestock herds is viewed as a source of cultural pride. Unfortunately, not only does the huge livestock herds cause environmental degradation thus undermining sustainability of the production system but also the pastoralists incur huge losses during drought as huge numbers of their animals die. Insecurity is also rampant due to a tradition of livestock rustling and conflicts over pasture among rival communities. Although the new tarmac road from Moyale to Nairobi has significantly eased the problem of transportation in and out of the county, the situation is still far from perfect due to the poor state of roads in the county.The core actors in a value chain rely on an ally of indirect partners who provide them with the inputs/ services they require to perform their functions or who perform some regulatory functions in the value chain. There are various indirect partners who provides support to the core actors in the Marsabit livestock value chain. The most important support services required by the core actors in the value chain include animal health inputs and services, research and extension services, market information and transport. This section looks at provision of key support services and inputs by the indirect partners in the value chain.Like everywhere else in Kenya, delivery of livestock health inputs and services in Marsabit is a joint responsibility of both the public and private sector. Under the devolved system of government, the responsibilities of the county veterinary department include surveillance and control of notifiable livestock diseases; meat inspection; regulation of livestock movement through issuance of movement permits; and monitoring and regulation of the private animal health sector. Again, just like in other counties in northern and northeastern Kenya, the public animal health sector in Marsabit, either on its own or in conjunction with donor organizations, is often involved in delivery of animal health inputs and/or services to livestock producers. Beneficiaries in many of these cases are not charged for the inputs and services which are usually treated as a form of aid.Numerous challenges undermine the capacity of the Marsabit county veterinary department to perform its functions chief among them being inadequate staffing and lack of facilitation. At the time of this study, the department had a total of only 26 technical staff including five veterinary officers (four stationed in the sub-counties and one attached to a project), the veterinary director stationed at the county headquarters and 20 para-veterinarians) and was estimated to need six more animal health assistants. Due to lack of financial and other resources the department had been unable to mount a vaccination campaign in response to an outbreak of the lumpy skin disease that was ongoing. In addition, availability of transport to deliver staff to work in the field was often said to be a problem owing to pooling of vehicles at the county administration offices.Information from the veterinary department showed that the most common livestock diseases in the county include FMD, CBPP, congolensis dermatopholsis and lumpy skin disease for cattle; CCPP, neurosis, enterotoxaemia, goat and sheep pox and PPR for small ruminants; and thrips, haemorrygic septaecemia, camel pox, worms, external parasites, ercia (sudden death), orf, ring worms and mange for camels. It was however noted that vaccines for most of these diseases have been developed and can be used to mitigate the huge economic losses often occasioned by outbreaks. A good example of the potential impact of use of vaccines is in the prevention of CCPP where the cost of vaccinating an animal is about KES10 only. Vaccination should be performed twice a year bringing the total cost to KES20 per animal. In comparison treatment for the disease costs about KES600 for five animals excluding the cost associated with loss in condition among animals and the risk that a sick animal may die.A discussion with Marsabit county veterinary department officials revealed that transboundary diseases have increased in the recent past almost becoming annual cases mainly due to failure to impose quarantine when there is an outbreak. One highlighted reason for not imposing quarantine is livestock market closure resulting to lost revenue which is collected in form of various market and sale levies.Veterinary services offered by the county government are limited and insufficient. Producers mainly rely on indigenous knowledge to treat their animals. Survey results (Figure 11) reveal that; households get advice/information on veterinary input prices and vaccination campaigns from individual farmers (39.58% input prices and 30% vaccination campaigns), 31.25% for private vet service providers who disseminate information on vet input prices. Government vet providers and government extension providers also help disseminate information on vet input prices as well as animal vaccination campaigns. The private veterinary inputs and services sector comprises of private practitioners and agroveterinarian shop operators. Sidai-the leading agro-veterinarian input and service provider-has a franchise of 10 shops scattered in different locations (Shur, Turbi, Maikona, Korr, Laisamis, Sololo, Kalacha, North Horr, Mount Kulal and Logologo) across the county to build resilience of pastoralists against livestock diseases. Various agro-veterinarians together with Sidai fill the service gap of limited extension services. Some of the services they offer include; technical services to livestock producers, vaccination of animals, offer clinical services, conduct outreach programs to market the drugs, sell drugs over the counter and, training of organized groups and community disease reporters. Sidai has also partnered with the county government in procurement of livestock drugs that they use mainly for vaccination Like in other ASAL areas, providers of extension services in Marsabit mainly include the state and county departments of livestock and various NGOs that are active in the region.The capacity of the two governments departments to deliver extension services is however weak with staffing being the most limiting factor. The entire Marsabit county department of livestock for example has a total of only 15 technical staff (five in Moyale, four in Saku, four in North Horr and two in Laisamis) most of whom are stationed at sub-county headquarters as a strategy for coping with the problem of inadequate number of technical personnel. Other major challenges undermining the ability of the governments departments' livestock to deliver extension services include lack of facilitation to organize extension functions due to a lack of financial resources and skill gaps of the technical staff. To ameliorate the situation, staff at the livestock departments often liaise with NGOs to deliver extension messages and interventions to livestock producers in the grassroots when opportunities for such cooperation become available.To determine the effectiveness of extension in Marsabit county in reaching livestock producers, respondents during this study were asked whether they had received any extension advice or training during the last one year and if yes, who the provider was. Figure 12 presents the frequencies of the livestock producers who had received some extension advice and/or training during the period. The proportions of the livestock producers reached were rather low (9-26%). NGOs were the most frequently cited source of extension advice and training (26% and 18% of the producers, respectively) compared to government (15% and 18%, respectively). Other sources of extension advise including 'other livestock producers' and veterinary input and service providers accounted a sizable proportion of the producers who had received some extension advise (24%) compared to only a few of the producers who had received some training (1%). Essentially, these results demonstrate the wide gap that must be addressed in the delivery of advisory services to transform livestock production activities in Marsabit county.A key prerequisite in promoting commercialization of the livestock sector is the development of properly functioning markets that are transparent and competitive. The theory of competition assumes perfect information among both buyers and sellers. Findings during this study however suggest that this assumption is largely untrue in the case of the livestock sector in Marsabit. In the county, about half (50%) of the livestock producers surveyed during this study said that they were often uninformed about prevailing prices and the desired quality of animals by buyers in markets where they sell their livestock. Moreover, majority (80%) of those who claimed to be informed about the market conditions, cited other livestock producers who had recently visited the market(s) as their source of information (Table 21). An important challenge when producers rely on 'other livestock producers' as a source of market information is that messages passed across may be inaccurate or outdated. The tendency for pastoral livestock producers to be less informed about prevailing market conditions has also been reported by the LINKS project (MacOpiyo 2008 et al.) and Mukhebi (1999) and serves to increase transaction costs during livestock marketing. For example, during visits in livestock markets during the current study, cases were documented where attempts by pastoralists to sell animals were unsuccessful because the prevailing prices when they took the animals to the market were too low compared to the levels that they were anticipating based on the information they initially had. Rather than accept a low price some of the sellers opted to go back home with their animals which they then tried to sell at a later date at the same or a different market. When such a decision is made the seller incurs added costs of transporting the unsold livestock back home, transporting them again to the market and maintenance during the time the animals are in his custody.To improve the efficiency of livestock marketing activities in Marsabit and other pastoral areas there is need for a reliable livestock market information system. It is however important to note that there have been initiatives to set up livestock market information systems in pastoral areas in Kenya in the past. An example of these initiatives is the National Market Information System developed and operated by LINKS in conjunction with the Ministry of Livestock and KLMC and which is now dysfunctional. The problem with such project funded initiatives is that sustainability tends to be a challenge when the sponsoring project ends. A potential way of addressing this drawback is designing an information system that allows for entry and exit of sponsors with minimal disruptions and which should be hosted at a government ministry or an organization such as KLMC. Such a system could work closely with the LMAs in charge of managing livestock markets which could be used to collect the required market information for dissemination. However, as a stop gap measure before the setting up of the market information system, LMAs could be used to gather market information and disseminate it through billboards elected in livestock markets. The LINKs project used to display market information in Garissa and other livestock markets.Majority of livestock producers are subsistence oriented and with low market offtake. Households mainly sell animals based on the amount of money required to meet emergency needs like; food, school fees, medical expenses or when a baby is born. The low commercial orientation and low offtake even in times of drought is mainly attributed to: need-based selling behaviour of the pastoralists, low animal prices especially during draught, low level of education and lack of awareness of the business opportunity that exist while prices are good such that a producer can sell the animals when prices are good and restock after draught, producers are not willing to sell their good breeds since they are not sure of getting the same good breeds when they want to restock.Distance to the market also influences market participation by pastoralists where pastoralist living very far from the livestock markets participate less in livestock market. In most cases people, animals (shoats) and animal products (milk) are transported together.Source: AVCD LC Survey (2016)The lack of a market and market day in Moyale has left producers and traders to trade all over the Moyale market with reduced volume of animals traded daily. AVCD-LC project could however collaborate with KLMC, the county government and other development partners to strengthen efforts of relocating the livestock market back to Kenya and support formation of new LMA for Moyale livestock market and adoption of co-management model.Awareness creation among livestock producers by AVCD-LC project to encourage market offtake especially of the male animals leaving only a few in the stock is a critical intervention. Also, on market participation when prices are high and then bank the proceeds which can later be used to meet other family needs. Financial education and sensitization for pastoralists can increase market offtake and commercial orientation. The project could also link producers to the highend markets from where they can fetch higher prices. This is expected to increase market offtake and reduce conflict which mainly arise as pastoralist fight and compete for scarce resources.AVCD could support sale of young animals which can be piloted with a few livestock producers and livestock producer groups especially around fodder producing pockets and then link them to buyers. Support of exposure visits and training workshops is recommended.Financial services are not sufficient in the county. Actors in need of loan facilities are limited by lack of collateral, yet the sharia compliant loans are not available. For example, fodder traders and fodder producers expressed the desire to own a tractor since they are dependent on one government tractor which is not reliable. The survey established that Equity bank has recently been giving loans to different actors using feed the Hungry as guarantor. Although Safaricom and other mobile service providers have made efforts to enhance access to mobile network by subscribers, this is still a big challenge in Marsabit county. Access to mobile phone network is also another big challenge which has also impacted negatively on delivery of financial services. For example, most M-Pesa entrepreneurs are unable to operate due to network accessibility challenges since their clients are unable to access money in their mobile phones. If Safaricom and other network providers can enhance mobile network and agency banking services by installing more network boosters, this then can promote banking and money transfer services which is essential in livestock marketing. This would also mitigate the challenge of insecurity where traders risk carrying high/big amounts of money to the markets. With increasing number of people owning mobile phones in the county, this is an opportunity which AVCD-LC can seize and target to use for disseminating information (Extension messages, prices, disease outbreak etc.) It can also be used to promote use of agency banking and M-Pesa services.Notable is entrepreneurs in Moyale (Galmate Self Help Group) who are running a livestock lodge. This is a place where the animals stay/sleep over night. This group charges KES20 and 10 for cattle and shoats respectively. The holding capacity of this facility is 300 cattle and 220 shoats and in a day the facility serves about six clients who come from as far as Wajir and Ethiopia. This group is also selling water and fodder for the livestock. AVCD-LC project can support more such entrepreneurs and link fodder producers to such off-farm business opportunity to create market for their fodder. Such a facility which is highly needed by both livestock producers and traders to keep animals overnight as they await sale or transportation to terminal markets can be used as an avenue to deliver some services.Fodder is an important component in livestock value chain in Marsabit county following feed shortage and challenges facing livestock producers. Actors in the fodder value chain in Marsabit are; fodder seed sellers, fodder producers, traders, livestock producers, brokers, transporters and bailers. Most of the seed sellers double as fodder producers and seed producers who produce fodder but wait for seed production and harvesting before they can harvest their fodder. On the other hand, fodder producers either produce as individuals fodder producers or in groups. Group fodder producers are majority in Marsabit county (mainly to access donor funding either from development partners or from the county government).Fodder traders are either large scale trader or small-scale fodder traders. There are two large-scale fodder traders, one in Marsabit township and the other one in Sololo. They are viewed as the most powerful actors since they control fodder prices. The small-scale fodder traders mostly double as fodder producers and fodder traders. Most of them are found in Sololo, Kalacha and Marsabit town-ship. NGOs and development partners are supporting fodder production in the county for example in Kalacha, some fodder producers were given initial seeds by Solidarity NGO. In Hurri Hills and Chaldesa two fodder production plots have been funded by draught resilience and sustainable livelihood project. REGAL-AG has also funded construction of fodder stores for the two large scales fodder traders and are now supporting an individual fodder producer who intends to do animal fattening and finishing. There is great potential for fodder production in Marsabit county especially in specific pockets which receive higher amount of rainfall like Marsabit Township, Mount Kulal, Chaldesa and Hurri Hills and other pockets where irrigation is possible like Kalacha.The other important actors in fodder value chain are the livestock producers who are either individual pastoralists or livestock producers rearing dairy animals under zero grazing system (mainly dairy cattle and goats). Brokers are also starting to emerge in the fodder value chain. They are found between fodder producers and traders or between fodder producers and livestock producers.Transporters are necessary especially where farms are located away from the store since most stores are located near the producers' residence for security purpose. Bailers offer bailing services to fodder producers. It is mainly done by youth groups as well as individual entrepreneurs (like Pastor Muthaura). Other service providers include; the county government and NGOs who buy fodder and give it to livestock producers especially in times of drought (Emergency fodder).The fodder types produced are; the grasses, agroforestry trees and leguminous fodder. Different grasses are grown which include: Cenchrus ciliaris, boma Rhodes, Maasai love grass (Eragrostis superba), Nappier grass, Pokot grass and Sudan grass. The most commonly produced grass is Cenchrus sp a local variety which is liked by many animals and is most suitable for this area producing many light seeds. Together with Maasai love grass, Cenchus grass does best in Marsabit soils. The second most produced fodder grass is Boma rodhes. It has better quality seeds which are heavy with more biomass and the seeds fetch higher prices. On the other hand, Sudan grass has heavy seeds although it is not very nutritious to the animals. The commonly grown fodder trees in Marsabit are: Sesbania sesban, Calliandra, Lucina and Malberry. Other leguminous fodder produced include: Lucerne and Desmodium.The average acreage for groups producing fodder is 10 acres while a few individual fodder producers around Kalacha area are producing on half an acre of land. The most active fodder producers come from: Saku constituency in Marsabit central (Sagante and Karare); North Horr constituency (Bubisa, Hurii hills, Kalacha, Maikona); Moyale sub-county (Sololo -Ramata-Guleid farm, Uran, Sololo Makutano); Laisamis sub-county; (Mount Kulal, Ngurunit).The costs incurred when producing fodder are: costs for seeds which range between KES700-1,000 per kg. For example, requirements for one acre of land are: 4 kg of Cenchrus sp seeds; KES10,000 for land clearing in case of virgin land and zero if the land was previously cultivated (clean farm); KES2,000 for ploughing using a tractor and in-case harrowing is required KES1,000. Two people are needed during planting at the rate of KES500 each. No manure or fertilizer is applied during planting. In addition, labour required for weeding vary based on land condition. For example, a virgin land has more labour requirements than a previously cultivated land. One acre requires two people to weed about five times during the entire growing period and each person is paid KES500 per day each time. In case land is leased, the land rent is KES2,000 per year.Fodder harvesting is done twice a year. Early harvesting is done when a producer is not in need of seeds. But where seeds are needed late harvesting is done. Costs for harvesting and bailing fodder are KES100 for a 15-kg bail and KES200 for a 30-kg bail. On average 180-200 bails are harvested from one acre during the first harvest and 230-240 bails during the second harvesting.Harvesting can be done for about five years before replanting a fresh. The first three years are the most productive however manure can be used/ applied to boost productivity two years after planting. The Seeds harvested from one acre of cenchrus is between 50-100 kg seeds. Labour for harvesting seeds is about KES100 per kg.The selling price for 1 kg is KES700 when sold to farmers and KES1,000 per kilo when sold to the government or NGOs. On the other hand, producer price for a 15-kg machine bailed hay is KES300-400 during dry season. Fodder traders sell a 15-kg bail at KES450-500. In case of a wooden bailed bailer weighing 8 kg the price ranges between KES250-300 per bail.Discussions from the focus group discussion revealed that individual fodder producers are more persistent than fodder producers in groups. One major challenge that was raised by producers in a group was group management including decision making. Some of the challenges and hindrances to fodder production include: lack of storage facilities, lack of technical skills on fodder production (agronomic practices), lack of harvesting tools and equipment, lack of market for fodder and culture. In fact, some fodder producers were found to store their fodder on trees.Source: AVCD-LC Survey 2016Culture was found to influence the local people's preferences. For example, the locals prefer milk from local breeds than that produced by grade cattle which would increase demand for fodder claiming that milk from the latter has a characteristic smell. Another cultural belief is that animals should not be left to stay in one place for long hence the nomadic attribute of the pastoralists. Thirdly, they belief that grass is a public good 'nyasi ni ya kila mtu'. Important also is the communal land which limits fencing by individuals interested in fodder production yet it is critical to avoid invasion. Human wildlife conflict is common-wildlife especially the Elephant destroy growing or stored fodder and fodder trees.Training fodder producers on fodder agronomics practices and support sampled producers with harvesting and bailing equipment can help demonstrate best ways of producing and harvesting fodder. On the other hand, most fodder producers operate informally with no contracts with other value chain actors. There is need to strengthen the relationship between fodder/fodder seed producers and the county government (ministry of livestock) so that they can purchase emergency seed and fodder from county fodder producers.Exposure visits and training to both livestock producers and fodder producers would impact on them the basic skills needed to produce and conserve fodder. This would in future ease the burden of rangeland dependence and massive animal death especially during droughts. The county government should also consider organizing agricultural shows where different exhibitors can demonstrate technologies and innovations from which producers can learn from. Such platforms would be necessary for establishing linkages between different players including service providers like financial institutions. Another important service which would support fodder value chain actors is artificial insemination services, especially for dairy animals' producers who are important players in fodder value chain. Each column, except the first one, scores the attributes of the matching column above in the previous table (1=low, 5=high). For the questions related to 'risk assessment' a negative score was provided **The same as the previous tableGarissa county covers an area of 44,174 km2 and borders the Republic of Somalia to the east, Lamu county to the south, Tana River county to the west, Isiolo county to the northwest and Wajir county to the north (Garissa County Development Profile 2013). The county is flat and low lying without hills, valleys and mountains. The major physical features are seasonal Laghas and the Tana River Basin on the western side. The River Tana has tremendous effect on the climate, settlement patterns and economic activities within the county. Principally, the county is semi-arid with an average rainfall of 275 mm per year. There are two rainy seasons: short rains (October-December), and long rains (March-May). Temperatures are generally high throughout the year averaging 360C.Given the arid nature of the county, there is great potential for expansion of agriculture through harnessing of Tana River and Laghas. The soils range from the sandstones, dark clays to alluvial soils along the Laghas, Tana River Basin and the Lorian swamp. White and red soils are found in Balambala Constituency where the terrain is relatively uneven and well drained. The soils have low water retention capacity but support vegetation. These soils have potential for farming. The rest of the county has sandy soils that support scattered shrubs and grasslands which are ideal for livestock production. The county's land is highly erodible.The county has seven sub-counties (Fafi, Garissa, Ijara, Lagdera, Balambala, Dadaab and Hulugho) with a total population of 700,050 consisting of 376,327 males and 323,723 females (Garissa county 2013). Land in the county is communally owned. It is held in trust for the community by Garissa county Government. Majority of the local communities in the county lives in informal settlements. The land use system is predominantly nomadic pastoralism. Much of the county's livestock population are indigenous sheep, goats and cattle, found in the southern parts which receive more rain while camels occupy the drier north.The total road network in the county is 1,804 km comprising 29.9 km of bitumen surface, 1,479 km of earth surface and 304 km of gravel surface. This means that most county roads are in poor conditions and impassable during rainy season. The county is served by three mobile phone service providers and twenty-two financial institutions including; eight commercial banks, thirteen village banks and one micro-finance institution. There are eight urban centres namely: Nanighi, Hulugho, Dadaab, Modogashe, Bura East, Balambala, Garissa township and Masalani township.Livestock contributes directly to the survival and livelihood of over 95% of the population in Garissa. Camels are the most important species, followed by cattle and then shoats. The livestock population is estimated at 1,104,184 beef cattle; 191 dairy cattle; 290,000 camels; 1.2 million goats; 900,000 sheep; 160,000 and 200,000 poultry (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015a). Presently, households own fewer livestock on average estimated at 17.2 camels, 68.7 shoats, 38 cattle than they did before the 2010 drought (19.9 camels, 80.5 shoats and 63.4 cattle). Productivity is low with milk production averaging 1-1.5 litres daily in camels, 0.5 litres in the indigenous goats and 1-1.5 litres in cows. Producers in Garissa seem relatively more commercial oriented than other pastoralists with majority selling cattle when they have reached weight and age for the market or when the herd has become too big. Distress selling is however also common due to drought and diseases outbreaks.Garissa is part of the northeastern and Somalia stock routes which covers Somalia, Mandera and Wajir counties. It is also served with tarmac road that links to the main terminal markets in the country, i.e. Nairobi and Mombasa. Garissa livestock market, considered as the largest livestock market in East Africa, has the best infrastructure in the county with: loading rumps, separate sale yards for cattle, shoats and camels. It serves as a regional hub receiving livestock from primary markets within the county and from neighbouring counties (Mandera and Wajir). Garissa market receives more than 50% of cattle from Somalia. Fewer camels are brought to the Garissa market. Instead, many camels from Garissa are sold in Somalia where prices are higher due to the lucrative export market for camels the country has in the Middle East.In addition, there are 19 interior market centres located in different parts of the county. Most of the other markets lack adequate infrastructure for instance they have sale yards which combine all species of animals. Consequently, producers are left to depend on distant markets and those who cannot make to travel such distances are exposed to exploitation by middlemen. In addition, the livestock body condition is wasted when animals are trekked for long distances. While all markets in the county have LMAs in place, no livestock market is implementing the revenue sharing comanagement model.Notably, destinations for animals from Garissa county vary. Trekking is among the cheapest method of transport where on average a trekker is paid KES50-100 per cow depending on the distance covered. The costs for truckers range from KES200-270 and KES30 per cattle and per goat respectively, and KES4,500 for a truck load of goats. On the other hand, brokers are found in both primary and secondary markets. Those in Garissa market have negotiated for a flat rate of KES400, KES600 and KES100 per cow, camel and goat respectively. The purchase price of a cattle, camel, sheep or goat varies depending on the type of market (primary or secondary), on the condition of the animal, and on the period of the season, and occurrence or not of drought. On average the purchase price for a live cow and a shoat is KES32,000 and KES4,000 respectively. The sale price in end market is about KES35,150 and KES4,450 respectively. The butchers retail meat at KES340-1,000 per kg depending on the location of the butchery and whether it is meat from shoat or cow. Offal is retailed at KES150-200 per kg.In general goats fetch higher prices compared to sheep (Table 24). For instance, in 2015, the average price of a goat was around KES4,500 while a sheep was sold at KES2,500. This price differential reflects the preference of Kenyan consumers for goat meat. In 2010 drought year, pastoralists opted for destocking mainly cattle and sheep which are the most vulnerable species, and preferred keeping camels and goats. In general, 2010 livestock unit prices were far below the market prices of the following years due to the increase in the supply side and to the lower body conditions of animals. For 2016 and 2017, the expectations and planned annual volumes variations are positive especially for cattle and goats.With regard to policy and the legal framework for the livestock sector, policy formulation and enacting is a mandate of the national government as stipulated in the new Kenyan constitution. In the devolved governance system, county governments are at the nascent stages of development and are still grappling with the realities of devolution. Most of them are in the process of developing and implementing integrated frameworks for county developments. Efforts are being made to help the counties in domestication of some of the national level policies. Garissa stills lacking a sales yard bill that regulates the livestock market activities and its surrounding environment. Garissa county has a first Integrated Development Plan 2013 as a blue print for development priorities in the next five years. There are significant gaps in the access to inputs and delivery of animal health services to pastoralists. The Naitos Golden Inspiration (2015a) study showed that the majority (almost half of the respondents) of pastoralists, who have little or no skills at all in animal treatments, rely on themselves to treat their animals. The rest of the farmers either hire the services of the community animal health worker (CAHW) or invite a neighbour for help. Very few of them pay the services of trained animal health personnel. The low educational level of pastoralists, in addition to the lack of advice on the use of drugs, dosage, withdrawal periods and safe handling of drugs, result in high likelihood of misuse of drugs and consequently potential drug residues in animal products. Counterfeit drugs mainly smuggled from Somalia also constitute a serious issue affecting the efficacy of the treatment and distorting the market by reducing registered agroveterinarian shops incomes. These results highlight the gaps in animal health services delivery to pastoralists and suggest an entry point for government institutions, NGOs and development partners to tackle these issues.Livestock producers' access to drugs is not directly linked to the health service suppliers they are in touch with. In fact, agro-veterinarians are the main source of drugs for pastoralists. Livestock traders, CAHWs, and neighbours are at lower extent another source of animal drugs provision. Most livestock producers located in rural and remote areas are mainly served by agro-veterinarian fixed or mobile operators who buy drugs from the big agro-veterinarian shops in Garissa and then sell it to pastoralists.Drug handling and delivery is a serious issue especially for those drugs and vaccines who need to be refrigerated. A recent study by Waithanji et al. (2015) on the delivery of the CBPP vaccine in northeastern Kenya (Ijara-Garissa county) indicated the existence of a private public vaccine delivery hybrid model. The study revealed that the poor infrastructure and delivery mechanisms (bad road conditions, use of public transports to deliver the drugs, etc.) affect the cold chain which is frequently broken resulting in low efficiency of the vaccine. The authors also indicated that livestock producers are willing to pay a higher premium to access better quality and more efficient vaccines.Drug prices purchased form livestock traders or CAHWs are higher compared to those offered by agro-veterinarians. The total annual cost of treatment remains high, with the average cost for treatment per household estimated at KES10,318 for cattle, KES6,096 for shoats, KES10,667 for camels and KES1,000 for poultry. The county government is supplying free drugs and services to livestock producers but on the grassroots, the coverage is too low and irregular (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015a). county or government supplies of free of charge drugs and vaccines, although desirable when sensitive disease outbreaks occur, generally distort the market and negatively affect the private sector activities and incomes. Moreover, investment by the private sector in delivery of services and inputs beyond the urban areas has remained unattractive due to factors including high delivery costs due to the vastness of the area and poor road infrastructure, livestock mobility, seasonality in demand, insecurity in some areas and generally harsh climatic conditions, etc. Consequently, producers lose a significant number of animals each year (on average, 4.3 cattle, 20.1 shoats, 2.6 camels per household) due to diseases. The reviewed literature highlights a number of diseases affecting livestock in Garissa county (Table 25). Worm loads and tick infestations are common diseases affecting the different livestock species. Other diseases are specie specific and could result in contagious effect and incur high animal mortalities. Aware about the economic and social importance of the livestock sector in the ASAL regions, the national government and the county government undertake regularly vaccination campaigns. In 2015, the veterinary department of Garissa county implemented the fifth vaccination campaign of livestock with an estimated budget of KES11 million. Over one million animals were vaccinated in five rounds. Livestock keepers were asked to pay small fees of KES2 per shoat, KES5 per cattle, and KES10 per camel head.Garissa is among few counties in Kenya that are equipped with a veterinary laboratory providing services for disease diagnostic, disease investigation and vaccine performance monitoring. The laboratory currently can only do tests for CCPP and to a limited level CBPP. Also, diagnosis for haemoparasites from blood smears. But, residue testing in animal products.Has not yet commenced. Better collaboration with the private sector and use of the laboratory installations will reduce the spread of diseases, improve livestock health in the county, and insure better quality and residues free products for the end consumers. AVCD LC can therefore partner with the county government and other development partners to improve this satellite laboratory.The economic theory highlights non-access to information among the drivers of markets inefficiency and imperfection. Lack of available, reliable and sustainable livestock market information system (LMIS) in developing countries is one of the major constraints affecting livestock marketing and trade. Livestock market information improves decision making of players in the value chain. In most cases livestock market information is skewed to traders disadvantaging other players in the chain (MacOpiyo 2008;Mukhebi 1999). This is the case in Garissa livestock markets, where traders and brokers have better access to information through their contacts and buyers in secondary and terminal markets. Broker's intervention in the transaction between livestock seller and buyer not only distort the prices, but also impede both parties to know the real price of the animal. A recent study by Mwanyumba et al. (2015) on pastoralists' livelihood in Garissa county, indicated that a high proportion of pastoralists (30%) visits the market to get information on market prices, others ask their neighbours (18%) or buyers (10%) and a minority (6%) decides the price on their own without outside information. The remaining pastoralists (around 33%) used a combination of these methods. These results highlight the gaps in producers' access to pastoralists and the needs for a reliable and updated source of information.The collection and dissemination of market price information bears a high cost and in pastoral areas the systems for its dissemination are often not good enough to reach the level of the producers (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015a). Initiatives to collect and disseminate livestock market price information in the past have been directly donor-funded without inbuilt sustainability mechanisms hence they have deteriorated and vanished over time. In Kenya, a previous attempt to collect and disseminate livestock market information system called the 'Livestock Information Network and Knowledge System' (LINKS), was developed through donor funding and in collaboration between KLMC, the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), and the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries. The system collapsed few time after the program stopped.In Garissa county, has many livestock markets (primary and secondary). However, co-management model is not yet formalized. Of the KES290 loading fees collected per animal in Garissa livestock market only KES15 goes to the LMA while the rest goes to the county government. This comanagement model represents an opportunity for the development of LMIS. In fact, LMA management staff is able to collect data on livestock supply and prices by species during the market day. Other type of information related to livestock diseases, conflicts, range access and availability could also be collected. In the current AVCD-LC project, the LMIS is supposed to have a wider range covering at least the five project counties. Garissa pastoralists and other livestock value chain actors will benefit from the development of the LMIS. Moreover, tight collaboration with local radios, will allow better information dissemination and coverage in the remote areas of Garissa. The improvement of mobile network connection within the county is also an important driver for the dissemination of livestock market information through SMS. Value chain actors and stakeholders will be able to access timely and precise information by paying small fees (KES2 or KES3 by type of information required).There are various gaps impeding higher and more efficient commercial production in Garissa county. The first constraint relates to the absence of a clear and transparent livestock grading system which affects the provision of high quality animals to the markets. In fact, livestock producers are unable to categorize their animals into different grades (grade I, grade II, grade III, etc.) to fetch the corresponding price interval. Currently the 'eye ball valuation' of animals is done in small stock the brokers mainly assess the lumber region for meat coverage to inform the price decision. There is therefore no clear attributes and their corresponding levels that allow such classification. Kenyan livestock stakeholders can borrow from the existing Somali livestock grading scheme which relies on animal attributes such as sex, age, conformation, and body condition to categorize the animals. The Somali grading scheme segments small ruminants into four categories (Grade I, Grade II, Grade III, Local), cattle into 2 categories 'mature' (including 3 grades) and 'immature' (including 2 grades), and camels into 2 categories too: 'mature' (including 2 grades) and 'immature' (including 2 grades). The development and establishment of a recognized grading scheme will allow smallholder livestock producers to improve the quality of the animals sold to fetch higher prices. It will also provide the desired livestock market information system with more precise livestock prices correlated with the grade of the animal.The cross-borders livestock trade represents an opportunity for Garissa county to boost the demand and supply of animals from inside and outside Kenya placing Garissa livestock market as a regional hub. However, the informal and non-controlled cross-borders trade brings challenges in term of animal health and disease outbreaks. If the local authority does not take effective and efficient veterinary measures in controlling the flow of animals coming to Garissa from Somalia and Ethiopia (through Wajir and Mandera), the risk of outbreaks will remain very high and might result in the shutdown of livestock markets and trade in Garissa. In its Vision 2030, the Government of Kenya aims to establish four disease-free zones. The first being at the Coast, covering the counties of Kwale, Mombasa, Kilifi, Tana River, Lamu and parts of Taita-Taveta. The other three zones will be established in the Laikipia-Isiolo complex, Uasin Gishu and Garissa Counties. None of these have been completed yet (International Development 2014). The establishment of these diseasefree zones will ease the exports of meat to the Middle East and Europe (although Kenya is a meat deficit country). More importantly it will improve the animal health status in the county but will also increase the transaction costs for doing livestock business, and will increase meat prices.The poor condition of the roads within the county is another constraint for commercial production. It increases transport costs and restrict smallholders' access to secondary and primary livestock markets. Mwanyumba et al. (2015) mentioned that high transport and labour costs are among the main marketing constraints faced by pastoralists in Garissa. The authors also highlighted the lack of or inadequate water and forage along the way. There is no direct trade, no verbal or written agreements between livestock producers and private slaughterhouses and meat processors in Nairobi, or fattening ranches in Mombasa and the coastal region. A recent study conducted few months ago by ILRI-KLMC assessing the LMAs in Garissa county, showed that livestock producers were more present in the LMA composition in the primary livestock markets (like Balambala), while the biggest secondary markets (Garissa and Bura) are mainly controlled by traders and brokers. These facts show the limited access to and control for livestock producers over the main livestock markets in the county.The national government and the Garissa county government are putting in place infrastructural development initiatives which include the construction of an export abattoir, a tannery, and two camel milk processing units, however none of these interventions have been completed. These investments once finalized, will create new jobs especially in the peri-urban areas of Garissa city and the other major towns in the county. The construction of the export abattoir will provide direct jobs to the persons who will be employed by the abattoir (manager, slaughter men/women, flayers, lab technicians, veterinarians, unskilled workers, etc.), and will also create indirect jobs like livestock transporters, meat transporters, food and tea service providers, etc.The tannery will provide direct jobs for skilled (manager, accountant, textile engineer, technicians, etc.) and unskilled workers. It will also create additional jobs in the hides and skins value chain including hides and skins collection (collectors), wholesaling, transportation, etc. The tannery will mainly source its raw material from the export abattoir, and the butcheries and abattoirs within the major towns. Slaughter slabs will also be targeted as source of hides and skins. The development of the hides and skins value chain will provide jobs for women, who could be involved in hides and skins salting and drying, and youth who could be involved in the collection and transport of the hides and skins. The most important threat/constraint to take into account is that the value chain will be highly interrelated with the export abattoir performance.Camel milk demand in Garissa is increasing and the few shops around the city are not able to fulfil the demand, especially during Ramadan and festive seasons. One of the camel dairy shops' owner interviewed indicated he has two main clients: consumers buying fresh or fermented (sour) camel milk from his outlet, and hotels to whom he delivers the milk. He mentioned that very frequently during the dry season (June-September) he is not able to meet the demand and has to compromise on the delivery for hotels and restaurants. Prices also increase by 25% in comparison with the wet season. Camel milk collection is very challenging with large producers being located far from the urban centres. Young people could be involved in the booming business of camel milk collection. The local small processors are trying to get health and product certification from the Kenya Bureau of Standards to sell their products in Nairobi in supermarkets and delicatessen shops, if it happens, this will require transport logistics where young persons could be involved.Communal grazing is common in Garissa county just like many other ASAL counties. Inadequate pasture and water scarcity are among the challenges affecting livestock value chain. Community grazing management committees help in management of grazing land such that, the grazing plan is scheduled in a way that during the dry season animals move to the delta in Garsen. But, when the drought is prolonged animals move across the border to Taita-Taveta county while others move to Somalia leaving behind the remnant herd (lactating and in-calf animals and calves). In fact, about 90% of pastoralists depend on pasture grass. Costs incurred when animals migrate during drought include: KES18,000 for leasing pasture land, KES7,450 for herdsmen, KES5,300 miscellaneous costs while KES2,000-6,000 being costs for buying fodder for the remnant animals.Fodder value chain actors mainly comprise of: Fodder producers operating as individuals or in groups who produce fodder under rain fed or irrigated. The cost for irrigated fodder is about KES270-305 per bail. Some of the constraints facing fodder producers include: Lack of a ready market, lack of storage facilities, high cost of producing irrigated fodder, lack of storage facilities and lack of bailing equipment. Some fodder producers use bailing boxes of 15 kg or 25 kg while other store it as loose hay. In fact, there are no bailing machines in the whole county. Invasion by wild livestock and animals is also common. Access to pasture seeds and culture also influence greatly fodder production. AVCD-LC project can therefore support fodder seed production by both groups and individual fodder producers. Moreover, sampled fodder producers can be supported with fodder harvesting and bailing tools and equipment. This same category can be trained on agronomic practices of fodder production as well as fodder harvesting and storage techniques. The trained producers can then be tasked to train the other fodder producers.Even though Garissa county has great potential for fodder production especially along riverine of Tana, there is limited exploitation of this potential. Fodder production and conservation across the county is an opportunity if exploited can be used as strategic feed reserve for use during the dry season. Very few (10%) pastoralist produce and conserve fodder mainly due to high cost of irrigation, limited storage facilities, lack of finances among others. However, efforts to promote market value of produced animals through integration of fodder are underway. For example, Africa Development Solutions (Adeso) in collaboration with KALRO had plans to put up feedlots, unfortunately the project was terminated. AVCD-LC can collaborate with Adeso to scale up fodder production especially in pockets where fodder production is feasible.The commonly grown fodder in Garissa county is: Sudan grass, Cenchrus ciliaris and Rhodes grasses which are preferred due to their superior water-use efficiency under limited soil moisture content, fast germination rates, deeper and extensive rooting systems, high biomass and crude protein. Other types include: Eragrostis superba and Napier grass. Notable is the scarcity of fodder seeds. AVCD-LC project should also support production of fodder seeds through training interested new and existing fodder producers in the county. Priority should be given on local draught resistant varieties which are high producing. In addition, the project can support the existing groups to strengthen their organizational structure in order to effectively manage and monitor the business enterprise and facilitate linkages between the groups and the service providers like; input suppliers, financial institutions and also link the fodder producing groups to the market.Livestock producers and livestock traders play an important role in fodder value chain. They provide market for Fodder. During market days fodder is largely traded to the tune of 10-15 lorries for each market day. In fact, about 300 bales of fodder are traded every market day in Garissa livestock market which is the largest in the county. Sometimes livestock producers buy standing fodder at KES200 per 10 square metres and they have a high preference for green fodder since pastoralist belief dry fodder has lost its nutritive value. On the other hand, fodder traders in Garissa county are mainly women groups who buy fodder at a wholesale price of KES200 per bale which they later sell at KES250-350 per 15 kg bale. At times the price can be as high as KES400 per bale during drought and as low as 200 in non-drought years. AVCD-LC should therefore support fodder commercialization model of both group and individual fodder producers for especially women and youth So that they can take up fodder production as a business enterprise producing in bulk so as to enjoy the economies of scale. Unfortunate, very few women who bring fodder to the market own Farms. They go into other people's farm and beg to harvest the grass. Some pay for it, others don't. Fodder production can be approach from traders with farms who are interested in fattening of animals.Transporters are also useful, they are hired by fodder producers or fodder traders to transport fodder to the end users or to the market. Bailers mainly use wooden boxes and the cost involves hiring about six men paid KES300 per day to make 40 bales. They however lack bailing equipment, therefore the youth can be targeted and supported to offer fodder bailing services as a business to support the fodder value chain.Table 26 summarizes a selection of best-bet interventions that could be implemented in Garissa county through AVCD-LC project activities and in collaboration with different partners. The scoring of these interventions is reported in Table 27. Scores were allocated in a range from 1 (low) to 5 (high) for the 'positive' attributes. For the 'negative' attributes related to risk assessment a negative sign was added to the score. An overall score was then computed as the total sum of these individual scores. We opted to provide equal weight to each attribute. A total of 6 possible interventions were identified: i. Fodder and fodder seeds production; ii. Livestock vaccination; iii. Development and implementation of a livestock market information system (LIMS); iv. Development and implementation of a livestock grading system; v. Promotion of livestock insurance uptake; and vi. Supporting the co-management model and upgrading the LMAs. The comparison of overall scores shows that the development and implementation of livestock grading scheme was ranked first, followed by the promotion of livestock insurance uptake by pastoralists. The remaining three proposed interventions have almost similar scores, but some variation is observed in terms of their sustainability. Although the county is one of the largest in Kenya, 68.680 km2, it is rated as semi-arid (19%), arid (42%) or very arid (38%) (County government of Turkana 2013). The county receives very erratic rainfall of between 150 mm and 400mm annually with an average precipitation of 250 mm. Temperatures ranges between 20-410C, with an average of 30.50C. As a result of this low rainfall and high temperatures experienced in the county, Turkana residents face persistent threat of starvation and lack of water for both people and livestock.The population is 855,399 people: male (52%) and female (48%) (KNBS 2009) with the dominant community being the Turkana people who is the second largest community after the Maasai in Kenya. Several other tribes have settled in the county such as El Molo people who live on the southern shores of Lake Turkana. It is believed to be the cradle of humanity with the discovery of 'Turkana boy' 1.6 million years ago.Livestock farming is the main economic activity as presented in Figure 13 below. However, there is also fair level of basket weaving especially among women in Lodwar and other urban centres. Fish farming and trade is practiced in Lake Turkana primarily by El Molo people (CRA 2011). The main land use system is nomadic pastoralism and livestock kept are; cattle, donkeys, camels and goats. These animals are the main source of food and wealth of the households. Notable is recent establishment of irrigation schemes for crop production along Kerio and Turkwel rivers. The county is low lying with open plains, mountain ranges and river drainage patterns and is endowed with the world's largest desert lake: Lake Turkana. Rivers found in the county include: Tarach, Kerio, Kalapata, Malimalite and Turkwel giving the county great potential of producing large amounts of food, if properly utilized. Recently, commercially viable oil has been discovered in Ngamia 1 by Tullow oil (CRA 2011).Soils in Turkana county are not well developed due to aridity and constant erosion by water and wind, often they are capped by stone mantles. Colluvial soils tend to be reddish over the basement system and generally grey buff or white over the volcanoes. Aeolian soils are dune sands either active or fossil; Alluvial soils range from coarse sands to flash flood silts, while black or brown clays occur locally in areas of impended drainage. Due to the low rainfall and high temperatures there is a lot of evapo-transpiration resulting into deposition of salt in the soil and capping on the surface. As a result, only about 30% of the county's soil can be rated as moderately suitable for agricultural production.Road network in the county is appalling. The main roads (from Kainuk to Lodwar and the Lodwar to Lokichoggio) are in poor state. Feeder roads are also dilapidated causing movement of people and goods difficult especially during the rainy season. The county has got one airport and 22 airstrips spread across the county which are not well developed.National electricity grid is connected only to one shopping centre, Kainuk. Unreliable Kenya Power Company diesel generators are used to generate and distribute power in Lodwar town (Turkana county Development Plan 2015). The available financial institutions are concentrated within one central place -Lodwar. They include; three commercial banks (Kenya Commercial Bank, Equity Bank and Post Bank) and several micro finances serving the local residents, including the Kenya Women Financial Trust, Kadet Micro-Finance, Elimu Sacco and Turkana Teachers Sacco. This leads to low savings rate, low borrowing and slow uptake of investment opportunities within the county. In addition, three mobile companies are found in the county.With regard to policy and legal framework for the livestock sector, policy formulation and enacting is a mandate of the national government. In the devolved governance system, county governments are at the nascent stages of development and are still grappling with the realities of devolution. Most of them are in the process of developing and implementing integrated frameworks for county developments. Efforts are being made to help the counties in domestication of some of the national level policies. Turkana county has now a second annual development plan 2015/2016 to guide the county development agenda. They also developed a County integrated development plan (county government of Garissa 2013) as a blue print for development priorities in the next five years.The species of animals kept include small ruminants (sheep: 931,323 and goats: 2,619,323), cattle: 89,832 and camels: 175,851 as indicated in Figure 14 below. The system of production is mainly pastoral exhibiting both 'boom and burst' cycles (livestock population builds up and bursts from various weather facts-draught and natural disasters). As a result, most pastoralists are either moving away, branching out, hanging in, or stepping up based on degree of vulnerability and resilience status. Meat goat value chain is considered as the high priority value chain in the county. The numbers of livestock kept (especially cattle) seem to be on a downward trend. This reflects the impact of external shocks such as droughts and diseases and presents a value chain that is constrained by low local supply especially for cattle and heavily dependent on livestock flowing in from other counties and countries. The breeds of animals kept are indigenous types and often tend to be of low genetic potential. For instance, the Small East African Goat, though well adapted for ASAL areas has a very low production potential with regard to milk and carcass outputs. Likewise, the breed of camels kept, that is the Turkana camel, is also a low milk producer compared to the Somali and Pakistan camels. . The catchment areas are; West Pokot, Baringo, Marakwet and extending beyond the national boundaries into Ethiopia, South Sudan, and Uganda. The county is well positioned for both aggregation and transit area between Kenya and vast pastoral areas of South Sudan. Livestock from the county is traded in primary markets, secondary markets and end markets (Nairobi, Eldoret and Nakuru for cattle). The trend of cattle sales during the period 2010-2015 shows a stagnation of the number of cattle sold varying between 7,000 and 7,600 heads/year (Table 28). However, average unit prices of cattle significantly increased during the same period (+79%) which indicates a high demand for beef meat in and outside the region. Goats are generally preferred to sheep and fetch slightly a higher price (10-15% more) in the markets. In 2015, camel sales witnessed the highest increase in sales volumes during the period 2010-2015 with 69% more animals sold in comparison with the year 2011 (lowest transactions recorded). Bett et al. (2009) in their study in Turkana county, found that of the livestock species kept, goats and camels were always ranked as the most important species for a family's survival. In order of importance, the participants ranked the benefits of keeping goats as food, dowry and money. Camels were mainly kept for food (milk, blood and rarely meat) and paying dowry. The authors concluded that interventions targeted at improving the productivity of goats and camels would have the greatest immediate positive impact on the livelihoods of the Turkana pastoralists. The data presented in Table 28 confirm that the preference for camels and goats (higher prices compared to the other large/small ruminants, and increasing sales volumes) still holding. The numbers reported in Table 28 correspond to average estimates of livestock species prices sold in Turkana county without taking into account the type of market where the animals are sold, neither the seasonality of the demand and the supply. Table 29 below, includes the average price information for primary, secondary and end markets.The average live animal prices within the county are; KES13,000-30,000 for cattle, KES1300-6,000 for goats, KES1,200-5,000 for sheep and KES15,000-40,000 for camels. The prices vary greatly based on the size of the animal and the market site. Accordingly, prices for meat vary with between the four animals: beef KES360-400/kg, mutton/chevon KES300-520/kg and KES360-400 for camel meat. The highest prices being in Lodwar, Kakuma and Lokichoggio. The number of sheep and goats supplied to Nairobi from Turkana has however been on a downward trend and is currently estimated to be one to two truckloads of 250-350 shoats per week. Reasons for this decline include rising demand in the neighbouring towns of Kitale, Eldoret and Nakuru; high cost of transportation (KES80,000 to 100,000 per truck load of 250-350 goats or 35-40 cattle); and increased demand for livestock products in Turkana due to factors including the Tullow oil project, a high refugee population in Kakuma and the devolution of government functions. On the other hand, prices for hides and skins are extremely low. The community also, trades less in hides and skins due to alternative uses (beddings) of these products. The average price for hides is KES500 and skins is KES50. However, a new JICA funded tannery in Lodwar town is expected to enhance trade of hides and skins and general leather development in the county.The livestock value chain in Turkana is characterized by huge gaps in accessibility of crucial support services by core actors. Animal health care and delivery and regulatory services are under the county directorates of veterinary services. Unfortunately, animal health services in the county are unavailable to most producers due to a number of factors including mobility of pastoralists with livestock, vastness of the area, harsh climatic conditions, poorly developed road and communication infrastructure, high poverty rates, and low educational level of pastoralists among others. Consequently, like in Garissa county, most pastoralists treat livestock themselves generating high chances of drug abuse and incorrect dosage leading to resistance of drugs and drug residues in livestock products. A lower proportion of pastoralists invite trained animal health personnel. While CAHWs are also a common source of animal health services for producers there is lack of a policy framework governing their training and practice.The reviewed literature highlights a number of diseases affecting livestock in Turkana county (Table 30). Worm loads and tick infestations are common diseases affecting the different livestock species. Other diseases are specie specific and could result in contagious effect and incur high animal mortalities. The geographical location of Turkana county which borders three countries (Ethiopia, Uganda and South Sudan) is an enabling factor for the widespread and endemicity of livestock diseases due to cross-border trade and uncontrolled livestock movements. Bett et al. (2009) found that livestock movements, limited access to veterinary services and sometimes insecurity, as being the main factors that contributed to the high prevalence and persistence of livestock diseases. Most of these diseases were contracted in the dry season grazing areas where many pastoralists congregated to use the available (but few) grazing and watering points. Other challenges in the delivery of animal health services in Turkana county include proliferation of fake drugs and quacks, selling of expired drugs, misuse and poor handling of drugs by pastoralists, drug handlers and CAHWs, high prices and irregularity in drugs supply. The capacity of the county department of vet services to perform its regulatory roles (meat inspection, issuing of animal movement permits, disease control including enforcing quarantines during disease outbreaks) is very limited mainly because of very low staffing, lack of effective infrastructure for delivery of services as well as resource limitations.Advisory services and market information are also often lacking for producers. The traditional extension system has proved ineffective in reaching producers due to understaffing, lack of financial resources to facilitate extension activities, mobility of pastoralists, low population densities within expansive areas and insecurity among other factors. Likewise, existing market information systems are ineffective in reaching producers leading to information asymmetry that leaves producers vulnerable to exploitation by traders. In addition, most of the market information collection and dissemination initiatives are supported by donor funding and, in many cases, are not sustainable after the exit of the donor funding.In Turkana county, there is high number of livestock markets-bush, primary and secondary (Watson and Binsbergen 2008) some of which are co-managed between the LMAs and the county government. Out of the 32 livestock markets, 27 of them have LMAs and 10 markets are implementing the revenue sharing model in the management of markets. In addition, nine markets have market monitors employed by CLMC (county Livestock Marketing Council) to collect and disseminate livestock market information to traders and livestock producers. As highlighted in the previous chapters, this co-management model represents an opportunity for the development of LMIS. In fact, LMA management staff are able to collect data on livestock supply and prices by species during the market day. Other type of information related to livestock diseases, conflicts, range access and availability could also be collected.There is also need for the Turkana CLMC to play a greater role in building capacity of LMAs and lobbying for improved enabling environment for livestock marketing. The current AVCD-LC project undertook a situational analysis of a representative sample of LMAs in the five study counties. A major challenge highlighted by all LMAs is the lack of external traders in the livestock market. LMAs should therefore be coached on market promotion, identification and adoption of an efficient security enhancement model to mitigate incidences of insecurity in the county. Other identified constraints are: Low management capacities and poor organizational and documentation practices of the LMAs. AVCD LC should support restructuring of KLMC, CLMCs and LMAs to enhance their capacity in livestock and fodder production and marketing.The gap between supply and demand of livestock products is reflected by high prices. For instance, the price of a mature goat in Lodwar and Kakuma is about KES6,000-8,000 which are comparable to prices in Nairobi. Due to poor roads, expansive land area and non-developed livestock markets in the interior, livestock marketing channels in Turkana are rather long with many intermediaries which increase transaction costs. It is estimated that an animal can change hands between four to five intermediaries before the main buyer in one market, leading to an increase in cost by KES1,000-1200 per animal. Livestock prices vary between rainy and dry seasons as well as by types of markets (primary, secondary and end markets) as previously indicated in Table 29.On the other hand, the co-management model implemented between the LMAs and Turkana county Government is not fully working. Field visits and interviews with key informant revealed that in many markets (especially the secondary markets like Lodwar) livestock traders and brokers are the ones with higher representation in the LMA officials and members. Livestock producers are almost absent from these associations. The stranglehold of mainly brokers on the LMAs is negatively affecting pastoralists by providing higher power to the former group. Actually, Turkana county government refuses to develop and signs the sales yard bill, till this monopolistic situation is not resolved. KLMC and its branch CLMC in Turkana have an important advocacy and awareness raising role to play to unlock the situation and ensure higher representation and weight is allocated to livestock producers in the LMAs management team and membership. The current situation discourages pastoralists to sell animals in the markets, even worsening the low off-take rate and decreasing potential amounts of cess collection for the county and the LMAs. Previous studies indicated that pastoralists sell their animals only on a need based behaviour.Turkana county has poor roads infrastructure which negatively affects the livestock sector and livestock marketing. The long road connection with end-markets in Nairobi increase the marketing costs through higher energy fuel transportation costs, road taxations, bribes, security costs (paid to government security staff), and decreasing livestock quality (non-existence of holding grounds, animal stress during transport, dehydration, etc.). Livestock traders and processors in Nairobi terminal markets take into account all these costs and constraints before making the decision to send trucks or not and buy animals from Turkana. To be competitive with livestock sources from other ASALs production areas, Turkana livestock traders and brokers would pay little money to the producers. Our observations reveal that it is not economically sustainable to sell Turkana livestock to end-markets in Nairobi. It is more attractive to first focus on the booming local market (raise of higher income consumers' category related to the oil industry, and those involved in the private sector), and on the regional markets (neighbouring countries and counties).Meat processing and value addition is lacking in Turkana county. Lomidat Slaughterhouse, a community management abattoir dealing with procurement and slaughtering, processing and marketing of meat (targeting both local and export markets), faces many challenges to source the raw material (livestock) form pastoralists and to market its product (meat) within and outside the county. The company is buying cattle and shoats on a weight basis which is supposed to favour producers. Our field visit and discussions with pastoralists revealed that the latter were complaining from the low prices/kg live weight offered by the company and delays in payment. These issues discouraged livestock producers to provide consistent livestock supply for the company which was turning far below its technical capacities inducing problems of fund liquidities. AVCD LC team discussions with Terra Nuova NGO staff, who was involved in the project, revealed that the company business plan initially developed was mainly based on the high demand of meat during the period of nineties and two-thousands in Turkana county mainly fuelled by the high number of South Sudan refugees and the national and expat staff working for the international relief organizations based in the county. The stabilization of the political situation in South Sudan and return of the refugees has negatively impacted the business of Lomidat. There is a need to review the business plan and revive the company that represents an asset for the community and a market source for pastoralists. Buying on live animal weight, if it works, could be seen as a novel way of marketing that could encourage other livestock markets in the region to adopt this modelPerformance of rural and urban based economic activities in Kenya has remained low with weak linkage between the urban incomes and performance of the rural economy. Turkana county is not an exemption, investments in peri-urban business enterprises is low. One major hindrance especially to private investors is insecurity common in the county (livestock rustling and banditry activities). Such hostile territories are barriers to effective trade in live animals and for private investment in other economic activities. Mobile cash transfer should be promoted by creating strong linkages between mobile phone service providers and banking agency products so as to upgrade mobile phone network access in the area. The AVCD-LC project can, therefore, support the establishment of such linkages and the acquisition of business development skills, especially for women and young people in alternative economic activities, such as the food, clothing, agriculturalrelated input (veterinary and other agro-input services) sectors. Private investment in weighing scales by especially the women and young people could be supported.AVCD-LC can also support processing and marketing of hides and skins especially by working with the already existing groups in Lokori, Lokichar and Eliye Springs. This will create employment to the many jobless individuals in the county. Impacting business development skills on hides and skins will enhance trade in hides and skins. Training should also be offered to flayers, selectors, graders, traders and rural tannery units so as to increase the quality of hides and skins traded which are likely to fetch better/ higher prices. Linkages with the end market like Bata Shoes Company among others can promote hides and skins business in the county. The public awareness of a few private investors could be raised to stock industrial salt used in processing of hides and skins.Fish farming is common in the county especially in Lake Turkana. Targeted business development skills especially in line with: fish farming, harvesting, processing, preservation and trade for women and young people would increase the income sources available to this category of people. In addition, a few livestock lodges could be piloted in the county especially around the livestock markets.Livestock feed is a big challenge in Turkana county for the livestock value chain especially during drought years. Unfortunately, fodder producers in Turkana lack a business model for commercialization which has contributed to low fodder production, conservation and marketing in the county. Efforts to promote irrigated fodder production have begun championed by the county government, NGOs and other development partners. For example, Turkwel fodder production group is supported by the Catholic diocese. They are producing foxtail grass on two acres of irrigated land. However, most livestock producers depend on natural pasture land but they also demand fodder for their remnant stock which are grazed around the Manyattas. Some producers harvest acacia pods to feed the animals during the dry spell.Although locally produced fodder is scarce in Turkana county, a few people are growing fodder in through enclosures which serve as feed reserves during the dry periods (Lugusaet al. 2016).Great potential for fodder production exists especially along Turkwel and Kerio rivers and with the discovered underground water in Lotikipi plain which could be tapped for fodder production. However, AVCD-LC could support fodder production in the county by training the crop producers to integrate fodder in their cropping program and to also expand irrigated land so as to accommodate fodder production. The crop producers should also be trained on fodder conservation such that they can be able to bail and conserve the crop residues which can be used during drought. The project together with the county government could support reseeding of grazing land/ reserves especially in strategic identified sites mentioned above. Some of the grass species that could be used include Cenchrus ciliaris and others that are adapted to the prevailing climatic conditions.The majority of livestock producers in Turkana county rely on communal land for grazing their animals with about 70% of them grazing their remnant herd around Manyattas, 16.7% buy feed while 10% graze on leased land with only 3.3% purchasing hay (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015b).On average a bale of hay costs KES500, a price perceived to be a bit high by some (12.9%) livestock producers. Much of this fodder comes from the neighbouring counties like Trans Nzoia. However, locally produced fodder is much cheaper. For example, the Turkwel fodder production group sells to Turkana catholic diocese at KES250 per bail.The main challenge facing fodder producers is lack of harvesting and bailing equipment. On the other hand, the few fodder producers in the county have limited skills on fodder agronomic and conservation practices. AVCD-LC could, therefore, partner with other development partners to promote fodder and fodder seed production by such groups and by individual fodder producers. Some of the interventions of the program could be training on agronomic practices, bailing, conservation and storage techniques. Business development skills could also be impacted on women on fodder production, while the young people could be a good target for fodder bailing enterprises.In addition, AVCD-LC can partner with Lodwar Catholic diocese who are implementing a successful model where they breed local mixed breeds with Galla goats having two objectives in mind: to breed a bigger goat with a bigger frame and higher weight than the local mixed breed and secondly breed a higher milk producing breed to increase the potential for milk production.The diocese supports 56 goat groups with 30 members each. The groups receive improved Galla bucks, which rotate inside the groups, each member keeps the buck for 15 days. They are required to select the best does and mate them with the buck. Fodder producers could, therefore, be supported and trained around the dairy goat farming groups to create fodder market for themselves and others. This model could be scaled up with a few sampled individual producers who could be supported with initial improved goat breeds coupled with fodder production. 32. Scores were allocated in a range from 1 (low) to 5 (high) for the 'positive' attributes. For the 'negative' attributes related to risk assessment a negative sign was added to the score. An overall score was then computed as the total sum of these individual scores. We opted to provide equal weight to each attribute. A total of 6 possible interventions were identified: i. hides and skins processing and business development skills coupled with better nutrition campaigns; ii. Development and implementation of a livestock market information system (LIMS); iii. Livestock breed improvement and disease control; iv. Development and implementation of a livestock grading system; v. promotion of livestock insurance uptake; and vi. Supporting the co-management model and upgrading the LMAs.The comparison of overall scores shows that there are no large differences between the proposed activities. The livestock grading scheme was ranked first, followed by the hides and skins processing and business development skills, coupled with better nutrition campaigns. The development of a market information system was ranked third, while the remaining interventions received almost the same scores. The county is featureless plain with seasonal river and Lake: Ewaso Nyiro and Yahud respectively. It has seasonal swamps and drainage lines which serve as grazing zones during the dry season and are used for cultivation during the rainy seasons. Sedimentary rocks are common in the county and loamy soils in the north. Ground water is the main source of water harvested mainly from: numerous wells, earth pans, dams and boreholes. The county has mineral resources like limestone and sand and has great potential for solar and wind energy.Like other counties in northern Kenya, Wajir is predominantly arid and nomadic pastoralism is the main source of livelihood accounting for over 70% of incomes and employing over 65% labour force. Livestock production is not market oriented but rather animals are kept for different needs including food, income when need arises, social cultural needs and insurance or banks. Consequently, animal offtake tends to be very low leading to poor supply to the markets. On the other hand, there is very heavy loss of animals during droughts. Currently, producers have not yet recovered herds lost during the 2010 drought and there is a high possibility of herds of large ruminants to continue declining due to commercialization pressure and potential losses due to external shocks. There is also some gradual moving away from cattle keeping to more shoats. Camels are also highly preferred due to the high prices they fetch, use to pay dowry and tolerance to drought with the Somali breed being dominant Like in any other pastoral community, poverty is typically associated with stockless pastoralists.Wajir lies on the northeastern livestock trade route (Somalia, Wajir, Mandera, Garissa) that supplies a large proportion of livestock to the terminal markets in Kenya (Nairobi, Mombasa and Coastal ranches). There are two main secondary markets in Wajir county: Habaswein and Wajir. The infrastructure of these two markets is relatively better developed that includes a sale yard, loading rumps and toilets which have been installed through donor support. During our field visit to Wajir market, we noticed a lack of maintenance of the market facilities and infrastructure. The toilets were closed and not working, water which is an important source for both humans and animals was not supplied (a camel producer attending the market, was getting water from neighbours to water his animal), shades for sellers and buyers were not well designed, market gate was broken, etc. Livestock received in Wajir and Habaswein markets comes from primary markets within the county and the neighbouring counties like Mandera and Marsabit also from neighbouring countries, Ethiopia and Somalia. Most of these animals are sold in Nairobi, Mwingi, Thika, Garissa and Mombasa (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015c).The primary interior markets are spread within the county and they include: Griftu, Eldas, Bute, Tarbaj, Kotulo and Sebuli. All the primary markets operate on a daily basis, supplying livestock to the two major secondary markets. These markets do not have adequate infrastructure except Bute, Eldas and Kuturo which have sale yards and loading rumps constructed through donor support. In such markets with no market infrastructure, livestock trading take place under a tree, in the grazing areas or watering points.While vibrant interior markets can increase uninterrupted market participation of livestock producers especially by eliminating the brokers-who take advantage of the distances to exploit producers-and reduce other en-route charges. These benefits have not been tapped effectively in Wajir due to inadequate or lacking infrastructure in these bush and primary markets. These leaves producers with less/no alternatives, either to depend on distant markets (Wajir and Habaswein) and those who cannot make it to the distant markets are exposed to exploitation by middlemen.Besides the livestock body condition is wasted when trekked for long distances.On the other hand, co-management model has been adopted in Wajir county though its implementation is variable in different parts of the county. LMAs are operating in the two secondary markets and some of the primary markets, but cess revenue sharing is not yet implemented because of the reluctance of Wajir county government. LMAs have been trained in Wajir and Habaswein markets to facilitate market governance, maintenance of market infrastructure and oversee general operations of the markets. In addition, the two markets have market monitors, employed by CLMC to collect and disseminate livestock market information to traders and livestock producers. Regarding livestock markets in Wajir county, establishment and management of livestock markets is the sole mandate of the county government.Somalia and Ethiopia have a lucrative export market for camels in Middle East which pulls the flow of camels from Wajir to Ethiopia or Mogadishu. The large number of camels in the county offers a high milk production potential with an estimated 8,000-13000 litres of milk sold in Wajir town.The 2010 drought has drastically impacted the number of livestock traded within the county and affected prices which were more than 50% lower compared to 2011-2015 prices (Table 33). For instance, a sheep, which is less resistant to heat and drought compared to a goat, was sold at an average price of KES830 in 2010. The following year its average price doubled. Although there exists a tendency of pastoralists to shift from cattle production to camels and goats (more heat and drought tolerant), cattle sales have increased during the 2011-2015 period form KES15,000 to more than KES35,000 reflecting the increased demand of beef meat in the county and mainly in the surrounding counties and terminal markets like Nairobi and Mombasa. In 2015, cattle sales (value) overtook those of camels. As in the case of other Kenyan ASALs counties (Garissa, Turkana, Marsabit, etc.), livestock value chain in Wajir is characterized by deficiencies in the delivery of animal health services and veterinary products and drugs (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015c). These drawbacks are mainly due to poor roads infrastructure, vastness of the area, livestock mobility, seasonality in the number of animal to diseases, harsh climatic conditions, etc. Cross-border trade is another constraining factor, where livestock are informally imported/exported from/to neighbouring countries (Ethiopia and Somalia) with absence of veterinary controls and health certification.Similar to the Garissa county animal health situation, the majority of pastoralists, who have little or no skills at all in animal treatments, rely on themselves to treat their animals. The rest of the farmers either hire the services of the CAHW or invite a neighbour for help. Very few of them pay the services of trained animal health personnel. The low educational level of pastoralists, in addition to the lack of advice on the use of drugs, dosage, withdrawal periods and safe handling of drugs, result in high likelihood of misuse of drugs and consequently potential drug residues in animal products. Counterfeit drugs mainly smuggled from Somalia also constitute a serious issue affecting the efficacy of the treatment and distorting the market by reducing registered agroveterinarian shops incomes. In a previous study (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015c) the results from a household survey in Wajir county indicated that on average 7.8 cattle, 18.1 shoats, 2.8 camels and 3.4 poultry had died per household in the last 12 months due to diseases. The treatment costs are KES989.8 for cattle, KES2,538.6 for shoats, KES2,975.8 for camels and KES55.4 for poultry per year (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015c).The AVCD-LC animal health team organized few months ago various focus-group discussions (FGDs) in different villages in Wajir county. The FGDs included the participation of livestock producers, livestock traders, CAHWs and county veterinary officers. The main objective of these FGDs was to identify and rank the most important livestock diseases in the region in terms of their impacts on pastoralists' livelihood (Table 34). Trypanosomiasis, Haemorrhagic septicaemia and sudden death are the most important and first ranked camels' diseases by livestock producing communities in Wajir. During AVCD survey team field visit in February 2016 an unknown disease was detected as affecting the camels in the region. The symptoms of the disease appear few days before the death of the animal. A high number of camel losses was reported due to this unknown disease. county veterinary officers as well as the Nairobi national veterinary services collected blood as well as meat samples from the disease dead camels for analysis. The veterinary technicians/scientists were not able to identify the causes of the disease, and few months later, the disease disappeared. The same situation was reported years ago (around 2007) and the disease disappeared without any results from the veterinary services (Naitos Golden Inspiration 2015c). These recent and past incidences provide an overview of the low animal health services efficiencies in the region. For cattle, the most important diseases highlighted by the participants were FMD, anthrax and lumpy skin. For small ruminants, PPR, CCPP and sheep and goat pox were the most important diseases reported during the FGDs.Like in other ASALs areas, advisory services and market information are also often lacking for producers. The traditional extension system has proved ineffective in reaching producers due to understaffing, lack of financial resources to facilitate extension activities, mobility of pastoralists, low population densities within expansive areas and insecurity among other factors.The devolution system is supposed to provide county government's higher autonomy and the sovereignty to decide on the allocation of the devolved funds. Although pastoralism is the main livelihood of the ASALs populations in Kenya (more than 70% of the population is directly or indirectly involved in livestock activities), the recent figures indicated that counties' investment and budgets allocations for the livestock sub-sector (including staff salaries) where ranging between 1% and 3.5% of the total budget, which is very low (these figures are lower compared to previous, before devolution, national/central government budgets allocations for the sub-sector). Likewise, existing market information systems are ineffective in reaching producers leading to information asymmetry that leaves producers vulnerable to exploitation by traders.As discussed in the previous sections of this report, the co-management model represents an opportunity for the development and implementation of a market information system. LMAs through their livestock markets management have access to information and data on the number of animal species sold per market day, the prices per species, the type of actors involved, the animal health status and disease occurrence, etc. Although the current AVCD-LC project target to develop a livestock market information system (LMIS) which covers the five targeted counties, we think it is possible for each county to develop its own local LMIS (probably less complex compared to the project system), by collating daily/weekly information from the existing LMAs, and then disseminating this information to the different livestock value chain actors through the use of local radios programs and also by developing a small market research and intelligence team that could be reached by calling a hotline number (with a slightly higher fee to pay for the costs incurred to collect the information and to pay the phone operators). The information provided by the market research team/office could include daily/weekly livestock prices (by species, by grade, by livestock market, etc.), number of animals sold (by specie, by livestock market), number of animals supplied (by specie, by livestock market), livestock apparent or detected diseases (by species, by livestock market), presence/attendance of agro-veterinarians and mobile drug sellers, etc. The improvement of mobile network infrastructure and coverage during the last decade provides an enabling environment to implement such market information system.As in the case of the other counties, the absence of a clear and transparent livestock grading system represents an important constraint for animal marketing. Animals delivered to the market are generally too old, which has implications on meat quality, or too skinny to fetch high market prices. The establishment of a clear and transparent grading system will improve the quality of animals marketed and increase income for smallholder producers.The proximity of Wajir county to the Somali and Ethiopian borders boosts its cross-borders livestock trade (like in Garissa and Mandera) but represents at the same time a threat in terms of animal health and disease outbreaks. This calls the local authorities to improve the surveillance system and animal health service deliveries. An outbreak of FMD or RVF will have disastrous impacts on livestock trade not only in Kenya but for the entire region. The 2001 Saudi Arabia ban to import livestock from the horn of Africa due RVF outbreaks resulted in deep economic crises in Somaliland whose economy is mainly based on the livestock exports representing around 60% of the gross domestic product, 70% of employment opportunities and 85% of exports earnings (Mugunieri et al. 2016).During the scoping visit to Wajir county, We met with the LMA representing Wajir town livestock market. The county government has yet not 'recognized' the LMAs and the co-management model is not working. Wajir livestock market infrastructure is in very poor condition. The water point for animals and humans was not functioning. A camel owner was collecting water from houses that were close to the market to water his animal. Animal as well as humans shed were not constructed or usable. The market gate was damaged. There was only one loading and unloading ramp for both small and large ruminants. All these deficient market infrastructures could have been fixed and improved if the co-management model was in place and LMAs were able to share revenue with the county government and access funds.In Wajir livestock market, sellers and buyers are not able/allowed to directly interact and agree on prices. Brokers are always present between the sellers and buyers. In Wajir, clan tradition is very strong (like in Somali society) and livestock seller and a buyer from two different clans are not allowed to directly interact. Each of the buyer and the seller needs to interact with a broker from his/her clan. Then, both brokers will meet, discuss and agree on a price. Officially the commission perceived by the brokers for each animal type (shoat, cattle, camel) is fixed and accepted by all the participants. However, since both buyer and seller were not present during the negotiation between the two brokers, the real transaction/agreed price is only known by the two brokers.It is generally higher to what the seller is told, and lower to what the buyer is told. When both seller and buyer are from the same clan, only one broker is necessary for the transaction. Again, the negotiation is done between seller-broker and buyer-broker and never involves the three actors together. This situation inflates the price for the buyers, decreases the price for the seller, and provides the broker (who is the less risk taker) with the highest margins. It creates market inefficiency.During the field work, we visited the export abattoir near Wajir town. As in many other counties in Kenya, the construction of slaughterhouse was previously started by the national government. However, many years after the start of the construction works, the abattoir was not yet completed (at around 90% of achievement) and work has stopped because of funding issues.After the start of devolution, the abattoir property right was transferred to Wajir county which is looking for private foreign investors to take over, finish the required construction work and start running the slaughterhouse. The county government has already started constructing the tarmac road which will connect the slaughterhouse to the city centre. Few months later after our first visit, the road was constructed.There are about 200 ha under fodder cultivation in Wajir county (McPeak 2016). Some fodder is grown at the outskirts of Wajir and is mainly sold to the county and sometime to NGO's at a higher price. Fodder production is a business enterprise if well embraced by individual and group entrepreneurs in the county can mitigate the challenge of feed especially during the recurrent draughts. The produced fodder can also be used to fatten or finish animals which can fetch a higher price in regional or terminal markets. AVCD-LC project should therefore support training of selected individual and group fodder producers on agronomic practices and conservation of fodder. This can especially support the remnant herd increasing milk produced during the dry season. Further, support with shed nets for fodder producers can enhance its production and conservation. The AVCD-LC project could also support and facilitate building of linkages between fodder producers and various service providers, such as financial institutions most of which should be Sharia compliant for them to access the initial investment, input suppliers as well as support training of individual and group fodder producers especially on agronomic practices, bailing and storage. A few sampled fodder producers can also be supported to acquire basic fodder harvesting and bailing equipment.Wajir county is often affected by seasonal migration of animals to distance grazing areas which are far from livestock markets and from the market centres. Camels and cattle are the main source of milk for the pastoral households. Fodder production can support the milk value chain in the county where remnant herd especially the dairy animals can be fed on preserved/ purchased fodder to maintain milk flow all year round. AVCD project could also support training of youth and women groups and individuals to embrace rearing of dairy goat animals especially around the fodder producing pockets. This will ensure continuous milk production all year round even after migration of the bigger herd. Such groups should also be trained on milk processing and value addition so as to increase the shelf life of the locally produced milk. This will also create ready market for the locally produced fodder. The local indigenous goat breeds can be upgraded using male goats (boars) from high milk producing breeds. The project can also link such interested/potential farmers to financial institutions where they can get the start-up/ seed capital.Just like most ASAL counties in Kenya, livestock feed is a major setback in Wajir county especially during drought period. For example, in 2009 about 65% animals were lost due to drought. Sustainable fodder production, conservation and marketing can increase pastoralists' resilience to drought conditions reducing the number of animal deaths/ mortality rate. Fodder production is a viable micro-enterprise in Wajir county. Indeed, fodder production in Wajir county is more feasible due to the county's low altitude (McPeak 2016).For example, SNV, ILRI and KLMC are supporting Mungano Makaror farming group to produce fodder. This group which also engages in other agricultural activities like fruits and shoat production has been trained on fodder production. AVCD-LC can therefore scale up this replicable intervention across the county and other counties to increase resilience and probably influence commercialization of livestock value chain.The types of feed used in livestock feeding in Wajir include: Natural pastures, shrubs, tree leaves and pods). The grass species that grow/ grown are: Cenchrus ciliaris, Cynodon dactylon, Pennisetum mezianum others include Acacia species like Balanite saegyptiaca, Grewia Spp, Commiphora spp whose pods are fed on animals (browsers) during drought. However, Sudan grass and Cenchrus ciliaris are the types commonly produced under irrigation with very low cultivation of highly nutritive fodder like Lucerne and Calliandra (McPeak 2016).The commercialization of fodder is very low in the county. However, efforts to promote fodder production and marketing have begun. For example, the county government is supporting 10-15 km2 of irrigated Rhodes, Sudan and Cenchrus ciliaris grasses. A few pastoralists conserve standing fodder around the Manyattas while other bail the natural grass from community land. Some key constraints faced by fodder producers in the county are: lack of skills, access to inputs like seeds, and water, lack of/ poor storage facilities and lack of bailing equipment. In fact, individual fodder producers lack storage facilities but a few group fodder producers have been supported by NGOs to construct fodder stores in urban centres.Marketing of fodder is poorly developed in the county. Mainly, pastoralists buy fodder for their remnant animals while the bigger herd graze in distant grazing land. About KES5,000-25,187.5 is spent to purchase fodder for the remnant animals during drought. The average price for a bale of fodder during the dry season is KES700 and KES250-300 during the wet season for a 25-kg bale, while a 12-13-kg manual bale sells at KES500 during the dry season. On the other hand, the average price for a bale of beans stovers is KES1,000. The high price greatly limits the ability of pastoralists to purchase fodder for their entire large herd during the dry seasons. However, the county government provides support fodder during drought which they buy from fodder producers within the county.Access to fodder seeds is also a big challenge and the seed sells at an average price of KES1,000 per kg. Those producing fodder in the county were given initial seed by NGOs. Efforts to train fodder producers on seed harvesting were done by some NGOs. AVCD-LC could partner with the existing NGOs to scale up fodder seed production and train many pastoralists on fodder production, conservation and bailing. The photo below shows some of the fodder value chain activities in Wajir county.Source: AVCD LC survey (2016) and Naitos Golden Inspiration Report (2015c)Fodder producers could be supported to strategically produce and store fodder which they could sell in times of drought. This would fetch them higher returns. The AVCD-LC project could, therefore, support and facilitate building of linkages between fodder producers and various service providers, such as financial institutions most of which should be Sharia compliant for them to access the initial investment, input suppliers as well as support training of individual and group fodder producers especially on agronomic practices, bailing and storage. A few sampled fodder producers can also be supported to acquire basic fodder harvesting and bailing equipment. AVCD LC should promote and support fodder production through sensitization campaigns/training to especially the people of more limited wealth. Establishment of linkages between fodder producers and demand side should be supported. Pastoralists should also be trained on intensification of livestock production, this will create fodder marketing opportunities. Research on more costeffective storage solution should also be supported. 36. Scores were allocated in a range from 1 (low) to 5 (high) for the 'positive' attributes. For the 'negative' attributes related to risk assessment a negative sign was added to the score. An overall score was then computed as the total sum of these individual scores. We opted to provide equal weight to each attribute.A total of five possible interventions were identified: i. Fodder production; ii. Goat milk production; iii. Development and implementation of a livestock grading system; iv. Development and implementation of a livestock market information system (LIMS); and v. supporting the co-management model and upgrading the LMAs. The development the development and implementation of livestock grading scheme received the highest score. This intervention mainly depends on the AVCD-LC project staff skills and on low investments. It is also backstopped and with interest from the county as well as the national/central livestock departments in Kenya.The implementation of a livestock market information system, and the goat milk production interventions could also be considered for implementation by the project. Positioning livestock sub-sector as a key driver for delivering 10% economic growth in Kenya as per the 'Vision 2030' is critical. Livestock is an important sub-sector of the Kenyan economy with animal estimates of over 17 million cattle, 17.1 million sheep, 27.4 million goats and 3 million camels (KNBS 2009). Northern Kenya accounts for a significant (80-90%) meat supply nationally.Unfortunately, the livestock sub-sector in this area is confronted with many challenges including: insecurity, frequent droughts, poor infrastructure, disease outbreak and immense market failure which pose serious risks to the livelihood of pastoralists and their animals.In the case of livestock feeds, the challenge is that fodder production in northern Kenya is predominantly rain fed and many farmers do not conserve feeds. On the other hand, minimal public-sector investment by the respective county governments as well as inefficient and poorly coordinated support services are common in the ASAL counties. Many initiatives and interventions are being undertaken to reduce some of these inefficiencies experienced along the livestock and fodder value chains.While these challenges are real, the sub-sector has enormous untapped potential presented especially by the livestock revolution towards consumption of more animal-source foods fuelled by increasing income, population growth and urbanization which is expected to continue for at least the next three decades. Increased productivity and enhanced animal trade to meet the uprising in demand should, therefore, remain a priority of any development intervention.The results of this study reveal that in the five AVCD LC counties, the core activities in the livestock value chain comprise livestock production, marketing, slaughter and/or processing, and meat and meat products marketing. The main actors are: pastoral producers, livestock traders (of different types including bush, primary and secondary market traders), brokers, butchers and meat sellers, animal trekkers and truckers hired to transport animals. Livestock production is the bedrock driving the value chain, performed by pastoralists.The main species reared include: cattle, camel, sheep and goats, with relative variation in importance of these species across different counties/communities. The current trend shows a reduction in the numbers of cattle perhaps due to their higher vulnerability during drought and increases in numbers of camels and small ruminants which are more resilient in the face of the negative impacts of climate change. On average, the number of animals owned per household are: 8.74 camels, 14.6 cattle and 55.74 shoats in all study counties with variations in the means for each county.Producers are often not commercially-oriented but rather view their livestock as assets and only sell them when there is need for money or due to distress, occasioned by catastrophes such as drought and other vagaries of weather. Most (98%) of the animals and meat produced is low quality. The value capture by producers tends to be low (in some cases <35% of retail value) due to the poor quality of animals sold, the lack of a grading system, presence of many intermediaries in the marketing chains and exploitation by brokers due to a total lack and/or limited market information, including on prices.Drought presents a serious threat, with some groups losing up to 50% of their herds during severe drought incidences. Throughout the project area, there is obvious range land destruction due to overgrazing, a lack of grazing management, massive inbreeding of animals and frequent insecurity and rustling resulting into sedentarization. Over 80% of pastoralists are illiterate and they also encounter a dysfunctional supply of veterinary drugs. In addition, producers lack knowledge on planned grazing and husbandry best practices.Livestock diseases, such as foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), CBPP, CCPP, black quarter, Rift Valley fever, pose serious risks. At the same time, animal health services and inputs are widely lacking at the grassroots level with most producers treating their own animals based on their long experience/ indigenous knowledge. Though they sometimes consult with other farmers and agro-veterinarian dealers. In some cases, pastoralist buy counterfeit drugs which they perceive to be more effective than the equivalent bought from the agro-veterinarians simply because the concentration administered is higher than recommended. This is a health risk due to drug residue effects in animal products as well as resistance developed when drugs like tetracycline are administered to treat the animals. Producers also lack access to disease surveillance information.Demand for red meat is highest in Nairobi and Mombasa and, hence, they are the high-end terminal markets for animals coming from the study sites. Willingness to pay premiums for quality, reliability and cleanliness is higher among higher-income consumers in these cities. The export market for red meat and live animals is not well exploited; however, a noted recent trend in areas where cross-border trade is highest like Marsabit county is that, Ethiopia feedlots have created high demand for young bulls (259-280 kg) and shoats (15-30 kg), while more mature sheep and goats are directed to Kenyan markets.Possible areas for AVCD-LC investments and strategies that could be used to ensure that the proposed interventions bear the desired fruits are list below.• Investment in production and marketing strategies that aid pastoral producers to participate and benefit from the high-quality meat trade. A good approach to pilot this is to target niche areas where fodder production is feasible and /or is being promoted by other development partners. The project could support groups of producers to engage in finishing of young animals, especially small ruminants, which are then sold directly to high-end abattoirs. Selling through the NRT which have supply contracts with some high-end butcheries and who are a partner in this project could be explored in the case of cattle. However, this might require investments and commitments in guaranteeing supply by the producer groups.• Support for the development of more vibrant livestock markets in the project counties to cut down on number of intermediaries in the marketing chains. One good way of doing this would be by supporting the institutionalization of the co-management model of livestock markets through the enactment of livestock sale yard bills in the five project counties coupled with nurturing the establishment of vibrant LMAs that are charged with the day-to-day management of livestock markets. AVCD-LC could, therefore, support the restructuring of the KLMC and CLMCs to become vibrant organizations able to handle emerging challenges on governance, transparency and accountability to become more responsive to the needs of LMAs, including systems for carrying out regular audits and the signing of memoranda of understanding between the KLMC and the county governments where possible. This includes support for efforts to finalize the legislation process of the sale yard bills where possible in Isiolo and Marsabit counties.• Design of a sustainable and effective market information system which would boost the bargaining power of livestock producers. Although brokers play a critical role in livestock trade (interpretation and conflict resolution), sometimes they are perceived as actors exploiting producers. This category of people could be very useful in collecting and disseminating market information. An opportunity here exists for the project to leverage the knowledge and system developed by the IBLI and KACE.• Promotion of risk mitigation measures such as livestock insurance, feed production and conservation, and better range management practices including reseeding of degraded lands. For livestock insurance, there is an opportunity for the project to work with IBLI to intensify the uptake of the insurance product. The promotion of better range management practices could feature development of institutional arrangements that could enable livestock producers work with conservancies in grazing management and livestock marketing. The mitigation of livestock diseases including supporting development of vaccination plans against common notifiable disease and surveillance. This could leverage efforts by: county governments; development actors, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, that often devote resources to the prevention of livestock diseases in these areas; and private sector actors such as Sidai that is striving to ensure delivery of quality animal health services to producers. In particular, involvement of the private sector actors in vaccination campaigns could enhance their profitability and viability which has been a major hindrance to their establishment in the project area.• A major constraint to improving the prices that producers fetch for animals sold is lack of a clear, consistent animal grading scheme, as well as a transparent price discovery mechanism. AVCD LC could support efforts towards establishing agreed grading schemes in selected markets with strong collaboration with county governments, other PREG partners, LMAs and traders. This will help build producer awareness about the additional value for better finished animal and provide transparent standards of animal pricing.• Natural pastures, shrubs, tree leaves and pods are the main feed resource for livestock in the study sites. AVCD-LC and county governments could support groups and individuals currently producing fodder and any other potential fodder producing entrepreneurs to scale up the fodder production model in all the counties. This could be tied to dairy animal producers for a ready market of fodder and animal lodge entrepreneurs. Support with simple fodder harvesting machines could be given to few sampled individuals and groups who could also be trained on good fodder agronomics practices and then tasked to train the other fodder producers. Support with the suitable fodder varieties and subsequent seed bulking is critical for the fodder value chain. Similarly, AVCD LC should promote and support fodder production through sensitization campaigns/training to especially the people of more limited wealth. Establishment of linkages between fodder producers and demand side should be supported. Pastoralists should also be trained on intensification of livestock production, this will create fodder marketing opportunities. Research on more cost-effective storage solutions should be supported.• Enhancing the capacities and business skills of young people and women is critical. The project could support training of young people and women to acquire business development skills. This would help them to participate in both livestock and non-livestock related businesses. The project could link young people and women entrepreneurs to financing opportunities, as well as integrating nutrition awareness and promotion to enhance allocation of income generated to household nutritional need. They could also be supported to participate in processing/ value addition of hide and skins.• Most (98%) of the animals and meat produced is of low quality and milk production per animal is also low. On average, the quantity of milk produced during the dry and wet season is (<3) litres per animal partly because of breed quality kept by the pastoralists and poor herd management practices which is worsened by degraded pasture lands. There is, therefore, a need to support livestock breed improvement and herd management by the pastoralists. This intervention could be tied with fodder production and improved rangeland management to ensure feed supply especially to the remnant stock when the bigger herd is taken to distant grazing land."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2675534483.json b/main/part_2/2675534483.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16130afad91222fdced5b2734e1d5eadef7b5e46 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2675534483.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"114e9b50b632288f666b2b2e4ce3fb9a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/705b2278-9c14-400b-aef7-f629dc1ba07e/retrieve","id":"-120893496"},"keywords":["Educational animated video","cell phones","multimedia learning","malaria","cholera","neem","Benin"],"sieverID":"fec64179-9e72-4eb8-abb2-20e698e72cb2","content":"This study compared the efficacy of linguistically and dialectically localized animated educational videos (LAV) against traditional learning extension (TLE) presentations for learning gains of knowledge around agricultural-and healthcare-related topics within a rural population in Benin. While both approaches demonstrated learning gains, LAV resulted in significantly higher test scores and more detailed knowledge retention. A key contribution of this research, moreover, involves the use of mobile phone technologies to further disseminate educational information. That is, a majority of participants expressed both a preference for the LAV teaching approach and a heightened interest in digitally sharing the information from the educational animations with others. Because the animations are, by design, readily accessible to mobile phones via Africa's explosively expanding digital infrastructure, this heightened interest in sharing the animated videos also transforms each study participant into a potential a learning node and point of dissemination for the educational video's material as well.There are upwards of 800 million to 1 billion illiterate to low-literate learners globally, most of whom live in developing nations, and many living in rural areas and speaking diverse local languages. Given that literacy is generally a direct result of access to formalized education, the decreased or under-resourced availability of education in rural areas tends to decrease rural literacy; and national language teaching policies also affect the level of literacy, since local languages are often prohibited or unsupported in what fewer rural schools there are. As such, delivering life-improving knowledge to this linguistically and culturally highly diverse and often economically challenged group has been deemed a highly costly and logistically daunting task. Additionally, even for those people who are literate and live in rural areas in developing nations, technological and infrastructural issues have made access to life-improving education difficult.One path for deploying education to these groups has been through traditional government-based agricultural extension programs. Lately, however, these programs, both in the developed and in the developing world, have generally been in decline for want of funding. In many countries, this has meant fewer extension agents for the numbers of farmers. In Benin, agriculture extension agents are not always available for every farmer, and the resources these extension agents have to do their work is becoming more and more limited. For example, they will often no longer have the resources to create printed materials in local languages or even to have the money for gas to visit villages in need of extension information.In Benin, an added challenge is its 55 spoken languages (Lewis, Simons, & Fennig, 2015). To supply needed extension materials in many, much less all, of these languages quickly becomes cost-prohibitive, and assumes reading-literacy as well in its recipients. Such materials, in addition, need to be in a format usable across a myriad of cultural groups and levels of access.In view of these difficulties, over the past decade, there has been a considerable increase of interest in the potential for the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) as a way to address the aforementioned challenges and concerns, particularly in the face of decreasing funding. ICTs, in general, rely less on traditional means for information dissemination (i.e. institutions, printed materials) and more seek to leverage emergent information technologies (e.g. telecommunications, the Internet) to deliver life-improving materials.One such ICT initiative is Michigan State University's Scientific Animations Without Borders (SAWBO). SAWBO represents an academically based exploration for connecting global experts in a virtual manner in order create educational content for use by low-literate learners; an exploration that aims to produce tangible educational content that is both testable, useable, and effective in the field. By design, SAWBO animations utilize carefully crafted, cross-culturally acceptable visual images amenable to translation and description in potentially any local (or locally accented) language. Each SAWBO educational video addresses specific diseases, value-chain limitations or agricultural challenges and proposes effective and simple techniques that can be adopted in the field. The videos are provided free of charge and for educational purposes only.Creating the animation is half the picture; delivery is the other half. To date, SAWBO has explored several different delivery approaches using mobile technology, in part because cellphone use is currently widespread and still increasing all across Africa. As such, SAWBO's Deployer Application (App) allows anyone with an Android phone and access to the Internet to access SAWBO animations. The animations, in turn, can be downloaded onto an Android device through the Deployer App and then played at any time, including when the device has no access to the Internet.In this way, an extension agent or aid worker can use such a device as a portable video-viewing device for individuals or groups in the field, easily affording them access to educational animations either on a specific, relevant topic and in a specific, relevant (or locally accented) language as well as the local country accent for that language (where available) or at least the closest useful animation and language/accent. Additionally, the animation can be shared and transferred onto other devices using Bluetooth ® technology, allowing the animation to spread \"virally\" between phones, even those without an Internet connection, thus making it a highly efficient and accessible system of sharing knowledge. Shuler (2009) describes how the increasing functionality of mobile technology has created a potential for learning that comes with breaking down barriers otherwise prohibiting access to and the processing of information. Even in remote areas, mobile phones presently afford opportunities for users to access information and to learn from that information. The popularity of mobile phones across Africa seems to be making them increasingly more effective and less expensive. Soloway et al. (2001) and Zurita and Nussbaum (2004) point to the low cost as one of the major advantages of mobile phones as an educational/knowledge-sharing device among poor, remote, and underserved populations.Visuals combined with verbal narration demonstratively enhance learning (Mayer, 2002). Traditionally, radio played a major role in delivering information to rural areas in Africa (Chapman, Blench, Kranjac-Berisavljevic, & Zakariah, 2003;del Castello, 2002). Today, the Internet has revolutionized access to information even for people living in rural areas. Mobile phone technology similarly has the potential to secure itself as the key player in the area of extension information. This stands in contrast to other forms of educating farmers, such as extension learning presentations in villages, which can be costly due to resources, as well as travel time and distance for extension agents (Ramamritham, Bahuman, Duttagupta, Bahuman, & Balasundaram, 2006).Despite this increased use of mobile phones around access to information in less developed countries, few studies examine to what extent farmers learned from the information accessed, including learning gains gleaned from watching animated videos on mobile phones. Thus, the following questions about the usefulness of SAWBO educational animations arise: (1) do learning gains occur in populations in Benin with divergent educational backgrounds? (2) are the learning gains with SAWBO animations in target populations lower than, similar to, or higher than traditional learning extension (TLE) approaches?(3) will target populations in Benin be open to learning such information with animations on cell phones? and (4) would they prefer or not prefer learning from animations as compared to an extension agent presentation?Our work is framed in Mayer's (2002) theory of multimedia learning and Knowles' theory of andragogy (Knowles, 1980(Knowles, , 1984)), as these relate to learning from animated videos compared to TLE. To test the above research questions, we assessed learning and information gains within the fields of agriculture and health from three animated videos using a preand post-learning questionnaire approach. More specifically, the intention was to evaluate participant knowledge regarding malaria, cholera, and neem plant extracts prior to and following watching a short animated video about each topic in order to measure the knowledge they acquire from this experience (without the intervention of an extension agent providing guidance).In this way, our paper not only contributes to the field of learning and mobile technologies but also presents an innovative approach linking educational content and mobile technology together for the upwards of one billion low-literate learners with little access to formalized information and knowledge, but significant portion of which who presently have access to mobile phones (Bello-Bravo et al., 2011).1.1. Background on Benin and the context for the study Benin is a small country in West Africa bordered by Togo on the west, Nigeria on the east, and Burkina Faso and Niger on the north, and with a short Atlantic coast along the south. The political capital of Benin is Porto-Novo, but the government seat is in Cotonou, the economic capital. Benin covers an area of approximately 112,600 square kilometers with a population of approximately 10,008,749 people as of 2013 (INSAE, 2015).A tropical, sub-Saharan nation, Benin is highly dependent on agriculture, with a substantial amount of employment and income dependence in subsistence farming. The national language is French, but the indigenous languages of Fon and Yoruba are widespread; in all, 55 languages are spoken in Benin (Lewis et al., 2015). Literacymeaning reading and writing in the national languagein Benin is among the lowest in the world at 38% (CIA, 2015); literacies in non-national languages are not typically measured. Mobile technology use in Benin, however, is exploding. From 2000 to 2010, mobile subscriptions rose from 0.8% to 79.9%; by 2010, the mobile phone network covered 90% of the population (World Bank, 2014). This elevated percentage of mobile phone usage has decreased the costs of communication and increased ways for the general population to obtain information.At present, testing the effectiveness of educational animated videos in local languages for learning gains and technological uptake is limited. Technology and learning are part of a social context (Lea & Nicoll, 2002), and social constructivism (Crook, 2002) and cognitivism (Dror, 2008) alike characterize learning as an active and engaged interaction that then has an influence on educational development (Driscoll, 2000). Over the years, evaluations of numerous approaches and methods for agricultural extension learning, including traditional video, radio, and viewing clubs, have been conducted. For instance, while video-viewing clubs were used to train women on integrated pest-management for cocoa in Ghana (David & Asamoah, 2011), a small sample precluded determining the effectiveness of this approach.Besides traditional systems that provide information and training, ICT approaches represent a more recent opportunity not just for training but also as a source of information, particularly around entertainment and education. Mobile technology has been used widely in different ways: text messaging (Kachelriess-Matthess et al., 2011;Parker, Ramdas, & Savva, 2012), market information, for example, prices for agricultural goods in local markets (Aker, 2010), and other services, for example, banking (Mbiti & Weil, 2016).The widespread use of mobile phones in Benin is growing even in rural areas both in use and coverage; 83.7% of the population was using mobile phones in 2012, up from 7.3% in 2005, with 99% of the population covered by a mobile network in 2012, up from 43% in 2005(World Bank, 2012, 2014). Alongside this, traditional unwritten communication systems in African countries remain in place (Wilson, 1987;Yankah, 1989); Donner (2007) describes how deliberately unanswered texts and calls can serve signaling purposes, if also motivated by saving on data plans.Traditional communication systems still provide trusted sources of information to people, especially in rural areas with less technological infrastructure. Mobile technology builds on this traditional foundation and provides an effective tool that can be used for communication and learning regardless of literacy levels. In particular, mobile technology and educational animations represent an excellent combination for training in the areas of agriculture and health where basic education is sorely needed to prevent devastating crop losses and diseases.Farmers in Benin and other developing nations have the potential to access information through mobile phones, and since they constitute the largest proportion of the uneducated population in rural areas, they should be the main target audience of any exploratory ICT training. As such, the SAWBO program creates and deploys educational animations related to best practices in agriculture, especially for farmers in Africa. Any new approach must first compare traditional ways of learning with innovative strategies that involve mobile technology. By examining this relationship, we can properly evaluate the impact of different approaches and the potential usefulness of novel approaches.In order to comprehend some of the problems that farmers face in rural areas, it is necessary to determine what information farmers already know about a problem and its potential solutions. Historically, then, SAWBO has contacted and worked with global and local experts to research and create educational videos addressing three issues often faced by rural farmers: the prevention of malaria, the prevention of cholera, and the use of neem seed water extracts as a natural pesticide (SAWBO, 2016a(SAWBO, , 2016b(SAWBO, , 2016c)). Each video animation is 2-4 minutes in length, deploys a generalized but appropriate imagery around each topic that experience has shown is well-received by viewers (Bello-Bravo & Baoua, 2012;Bello-Bravo, Dannon, Agunbiade, Tamo, & Pittendrigh, 2013;Bello-Bravo, Olana, & Pittendrigh, 2015;Bello-Bravo et al., 2011;Miresmailli, Bello-Bravo, & Pittendrigh, 2015), and that affords \"localization\" with voiceovers in the local language and accent of participants.We narrowed our experimental design to address two main questions:(1) Are educational animated videos more effective in transmitting and promoting retention of knowledge compared to traditional presentations done by extension agents? (2) Do people prefer to learn via traditional extension agent presentations or educational animations in their own language? The first approach used the traditional method to explain the content of the videos. Before explaining the content verbally, a pre-survey was administered to ascertain baseline knowledge of the participants on the topic. This was followed by the verbal explanation of the content and lastly the post-survey was administered with the purpose of assessing knowledge gains on the topic. The second approach presents the same information via an educational video only.Both approaches allowed us to test Hypothesis 1:'Hypothesis 1': The traditional extension method of explaining the content will be equally or more effective in conferring learning gains in farmers as compared to the animations.'Alternative Hypothesis 1': The educational animated videos will confer greater learning gains in the farmers than the traditional extension presentation approach.Using the same surveys, we were able to test Hypothesis 2:'Hypothesis 2': The majority of respondents once they have been exposed to animations as a learning strategy would, on average, prefer to learn using the traditional extension method as compared to the animations.'Alternative Hypothesis 2': The majority of respondents once they were exposed to animations as a learning strategy would, on average, prefer to learn using the animations as compared to the traditional extension method.The current survey was conducted in Benin. Since 2002, Benin has been divided into twelve departments with 77 districts, further subdivided into sub-districts, and sub-districts into villages. In general, Kpomasse is known for a lack of training in agricultural neem product use, and malaria and cholera are perennial problems. Located in southwestern Benin around 60-70 kilometers from Cotonou, the population consists of several ethnic groups dominated by Fon and Sahoue as well as refugees from various African countries. The local population has developed various skills in plant production, fishing, animal husbandry, and small-scale food processing. Schooling reflects a 6-4-3-4 educational system: that is, primary school (6 years), junior high (4 years), senior high (3 years), college Bachelor's (3 years) and Master's (4 years) degrees.Data were collected in eight villages in five sub-districts within the Atlantic Department's Kpomasse district, as given in Table 1.Having discussed the purpose of our research with local authorities in each of the eight villages, survey dates were then arranged in consultation with them. One day before those dates, the study was then announced to the community in each village by a village crier, calling them to a meeting the following day. From the people who responded to that call, approximately thirty people were then selected to participate.Total sample size for this study was 248, with 81-85 participants taking part in each topic tested (malaria prevention, cholera prevention, neem extract use); approximately 30-38 participants per village experienced one of the intervention forms (animated video or TLE). Participants included women and men, all of whom were involved in farming activities, and included traders, small-scale processors, mechanics, carpenters, masons, and students. None had previously watched any of the videos; all had limited knowledge on this study's topics, but expressed interested in these issues. Wanting to increase their knowledge and skills around food security and economic opportunities, they reported wanting to increase their knowledge and to be well prepared for future challenges.Pre-test surveys of knowledge around malaria prevention, cholera prevention, and the use of neem as an insecticide were administered in the local Fon language at locations as detailed in Table 2. This was followed by either localized animated video (LAV) or TLE interventions on the specified topics, and then post-tests at all locations. All data were collected, both pre-and post-intervention at all locations, by questionnaires administered orally in Fon. That is, researchers read the questionnaire to participants and marked down their answers; this, in order not to require lower literacy participants to have to fill out questionnaires they could not read but also to avoid embarrassing anyone and for the sake of consistent data collection. These data also included demographic information such as educational level, Likert-scale data on preferences about the form of intervention experienced, and participant literacy, that is, reading and writing ability in Fon; this last in order to assess the potential or feasibility of disseminating written educational materials in this language.Survey responses were coded and analyzed in SAS using descriptive statistics. Chi-square tests compared respondents' percentages on the various topics. Correct answers by each participant were calculated as a percentage for each of the three educational topics, that is, malaria prevention, cholera prevention, and neem use; percentages were also calculated on a five-point Likert-type scale (strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree) as preferences for intervention form, that is, animated video versus TLE. All data were followed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Student Newman Keuls test for means separation.The average age of participants was 43 (18-70) years in the TLE group and 38 (19-70) in the LAV group, respectively (Table 3), with only 1.7% of the respondents being Malaria prevention AV** *To avoid confounding effects on the question of whether participants preferred to learn by extension agents (TLE) or by localized animations (LAV), we only asked these questions about the neem animation assessment, not the cholera animation assessment, at these locations. **In order to keep the TLE presentations consistent, presenters used a set of notes that outlined the main points discussed in the LAV. ***The 2-4-minute long animations were shown twice to participants using a laptop. literate in Fon in the TLE group and 8.3% being in the LAV group. Additionally, 68.3% and 53.3% of the TLE and LAV respondents, respectively, had no formal education. A higher percentage of the TLE participants were married (46.7% monogamous against 31.7% polygamous for the TLE group, versus 66.7% monogamous against 25.0% polygamous in the LAV group). The principal occupation for participants was farming, with 88.3% and 96.7% in the TLE and LAV groups, respectively. A large percentage belonged to farmers' associations (93.3% and 96.7% in the TLE and LAV groups, respectively).The respondents' age averaged 40 (19-70) and 45 (24-74) years, with 1.7% and 3.3% Fonliterate in the TLE and LAV groups, respectively (Table 4). A high percentage of the participants had no formal education (50.0% and 66.7% of TLE and LAV participants, respectively), most were married (66.7% monogamous and 25.0% polygamous in the TLE group, and 46.7% monogamous and 33.3% polygamous in the LAV group), and 80.0% and 98.7% farmers, respectively. Here, only 43.3% and 21.7% of the respondents belonged to a farmers' association in the TLE and LAV groups, respectively.The average age of participants was 43 (18-70) years in the TLE group and 39 (18-78) in the LAV group (Table 5), with only 3.3% of the respondents in both groups literate in Fon; 68.3% and 45% had no formal education in the TLE and LAV groups, respectively. Half or more were married (68.3% monogamous vs. 18.3% polygamous in the TLE group; and 28.3% monogamous vs. 21.3% polygamous in the LAV group). Farmers represented the main occupation of 71.7% and 60.0% in the TLE and LAV groups, respectively, with only 21.7% and 31.7% belonging to an association in the TLE and LAV groups, respectively. Here, we discuss specific findings around TLE and LAV interventions with respect to neem extract. While both groups answered a similar number of questions correctly on the pretest (Figure 1) (F 3,153 = 385.67; p < .0001) and both showed significant learning gains regardless of intervention type, post-test scores for the LAV group showed greater learning gains and significantly more correct answers compared to the TLE group.In both the TLE and LAV groups, very few respondents reported using synthetic insecticides; none reported applying neem extract to control pests in their crops, although approximately half already knew that neem could be used for various purposes (53.3% and 46.7% in the TLE and LAV groups, respectively). At the same time, a very low percentage of participants had knowledge about processing neem extract, about the preferred seed color of the neem seed to be used, or the waiting time before application of the extract as an insecticide (see Table 6).After the interventions, in both groups, participant knowledge significantly improved regarding both the use of neem extract for insect control (χ 2 = 6.5; p = .01 and χ 2 = 11.6; p = .006 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively) and processing (χ 2 = 22.7; p < .0001 and χ 2 = 41.9; p < .0001 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively), as well as around the preferred seed color (χ 2 = 50.3; p < .0001 and χ 2 = 27.7; p < .0001 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively) and the waiting time prior to application (χ 2 = 9.6; p = .002 and χ 2 = 24.8; p < .0001 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively). Only a third of the participants in the TLE group (who were not exposed to the videos) selected the video animation as an appropriate dissemination tool; in the LAV group, approximately two-thirds of the participants chose the video method as an appropriate information dissemination tool.For most of the parameters, no significant differences were observed between the TLE and LAV groups; the significant differences, rather, were found between the two groups in knowledge retained on neem extract processing (χ 2 = 7.8; p = .005) and the appropriateness of video animation as a dissemination tool (χ 2 = 7.8; p = .005), with the videos performing better on both of these issues. After the interventions, a high percentage of respondents claimed that neem extract should be highly recommended and sprayed on green plant parts. Most expressed that neem extract was cheaper than chemicals and that they had received new information that could be shared with non-participants. Similarly, more LAV participants (70%) thought that this intervention was an appropriate way to disseminate information compared to the TLE groups' opinion about TLE. Indeed, most of the LAV respondents underlined how the animations provided not only a voice but also a visual demonstration of the processes helped them to retain information.Here, we discuss specific findings around TLE and LAV interventions with respect to cholera prevention. While both groups answered a similar number of questions correctly on the pre-test (Figure 2) (F 3,153 = 365.04; p < .0001) and both showed significant learning gains regardless of intervention type, post-test scores for the LAV group showed greater learning gains and significantly more correct answers compared to the TLE group.The pre-test knowledge assessment for cholera prevention revealed that a low percentage of respondents were aware of the disease pathogen, knew people that suffered from cholera, or knew how to prevent the malady (see Table 7). After both TLE and LAV interventions, significantly higher percentages of the participants demonstrated knowledge on the disease pathogen (χ 2 = 24.6; p < .0001 and χ 2 = 7.0; p = .008 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively), recognition of cholera symptoms (χ 2 = 33.0; p < and χ 2 = 16.5; p < .0001 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively), water treatment to prevent the disease (χ 2 = 33.9; p < .0001 and χ 2 = 6.1; p = .01 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively), the waiting time after water treatment with bleach (χ 2 = 22.4; p < .0001 and χ 2 = 26.9; p < .0001 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively), and how to seek information at health centers for treatment (χ 2 = 27.7; p < .0001 and χ 2 = 11.6; p = .0006 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively). A significant difference occurred on the waiting time after water treatment with bleach (χ 2 = 43.3; p < .0001) item; that is, a significantly higher percentage (81.7%) of people in the TLE group answered this item incorrectly on the post-test.Here, we discuss specific findings around TLE and LAV interventions with respect to malaria prevention. As with the other topics, both groups answered a similar number of questions correctly on the pre-test (Figure 3) (F 3,177 = 128.34; p < .0001) and both showed significant learning gains regardless of intervention type, post-test scores for the LAV group showed greater learning gains and significantly more correct answers compared to the TLE group.The pre-test knowledge assessment for malaria prevention showed that a high percentage of the participants had knowledge about malaria symptoms as well as how to prevent the disease (see Table 8). However, a relatively low percentage of them (50.0% in the TLE group and 25.0% in the LAV group) highly agreed that Anopheles mosquitoes are the vectors of malaria or that the mosquitos multiply in drinking water that is not protected. A large percentage of the respondents knew how to prevent malaria (70.0% and 76.7% for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively) and all of them had suffered from malaria. A relatively low percentage was not aware of the fact that house sanitization (46.7% and 25.0% TLE and LAV, respectively) could help reduce malaria occurrence. Likewise, less than 50% * indicates significant differences within a method (TLE before versus after, LAV before versus after) with chi-square test (p < .05).of respondents in both groups highly agreed that a reduction in mosquito proliferation could lower malaria incidence.On the pre-test, a low percentage of the participants in the LAV group (25.0%, χ 2 = 27.0; p < .0001) did not know that house sanitization could also lower malaria incidence; 100% answered this question correctly after the LAV intervention. In contrast, while 46.7% of the TLE group answered this correctly on the pre-test, only 71.7% answered this item correctly on the post-test, a non-significant learning gain. In both groups, participants were not aware of the fact that both adults and children should work together to prevent malaria disease (χ 2 = 5.8; p = .02 and χ 2 = 24.01; p < .0001 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively), although most were motivated to share information on malaria disease (χ 2 = 7.4; p = .007 and χ 2 = 24.0; p < .0001 for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively). On post-testing, a large percentage of the respondents had increased their knowledge on both the malaria vector and how to prevent the disease (100% for both groups) and disease symptoms (90.0% and 100% for the TLE and LAV groups, respectively).No other significant differences were observed between the TLE or LAV for method of information dissemination besides the number of the participants highly motivated to share information (χ 2 = 4.9; p = .026). All LAV participants selected this dissemination tool as an appropriate method for information sharing.Most of the bed nets used in the villages are not treated with chemicals. Participants learned that bed nets treated with chemicals could be more effective at preventing malaria; the National Program to Fight against Malaria (PNLP) in Benin provides such bed nets to pregnant women. Participants also pointed out that bed nets are useful when you go to bed but the mosquito can bite before you go to bed especially because people do not use screens in their windows. Respondents tended to use traditional medicine for malaria such as neem leaves, which are boiled in water with the resulting liquid consumed to prevent malaria; if they drink it every day malaria can be prevented but respondents rarely reported following daily intake of the neem medicine.Regarding cholera, the information provided in the video was very new to the participants, generally lacking any previous knowledge about the microorganism as well as how the disease is contracted and transmitted. Participant knowledge in both the traditional and video animation groups significantly improved with regard to cholera disease and prevention, although participants in the video animation groups were able to better retain more detailed information compared to those in the TLE group.Similarly to cholera, only a few participants had prior knowledge about the various uses for neem extract and its application as an insecticide. Consequently, people had little knowledge about how to process neem extract or what seed color was suitable for such a preparation. While both types of intervention increased participant knowledge, not only did video animations more significantly increase participant knowledge about neem processing compared to participants in TLE groups, but also a larger number of participants identified video animations as an appropriate way to disseminate the information.Besides being reported as the preferred learning method, LAV are also designed to be easily downloadable, shareable, and re-playable on video-enabled mobile phones or other digital technologies (desktops, laptops, or from the Internet). This presupposes access (either loaned, owned, or rented) to such technologies. Despite very rapidly expanding digital infrastructures in Africa, however, no participants reported access to desktop computers. Similarly, only 3.3% of participants in the TLE neem extract groupsin the villages of Gboho, Lokossa, Kouzounmè, or Kougbedjireported access to laptops, while only 1.7% and 3.3% in the TLE and LAV groups in the same villages reported access to the Internet. In contrast, at least 68.3% or greater of all groups reported access to mobile phones.Overall, the results of this study support both alternative hypotheses that video animations would foster greater learning gains than traditional extension presentations and that, once exposed to video animations, people would on average prefer them as a learning approach as compared to the traditional extension learning presentations. For all three topics, the learning gains were equal or better with video animations compared to the TLE approach.With respect to learning gains around malaria preventions, the following trends emerged. While both TLE and LAV approaches showed learning gains, the LAV gains were greater. That is, with the TLE intervention, only four questions showed statistically significant increases in correct answers; with the LAV approach, five questions showed statistically significant increases in correct answers. The lack of statistical significance for many of the other questions may be due to relatively high levels of prior knowledge in the participants. Malaria is a very common disease, and all of the participants had suffered from it previously. Interestingly, for the animation group, 100% of the respondents answered all of the questions correctly post-treatment, which was not the case for the TLE group.Statistically significant differences were also obtained between the groups for the choice of the appropriate dissemination tool. The percentage of the participants citing the intervention method as an appropriate information-disseminating system was much higher for the LAV group compared to the TLE group (Table 9), suggesting that people who watched the video animations were more engaged by that tool. More LAV participants also stated that they were motivated to share the information compared to TLE participants.These results parallel the findings for the neem extract use and cholera prevention as well: while both groups experienced significant learning gains from both types of intervention, LAV group learning gains were greater, and LAV participants more numerously identified animations as an effective information-disseminating approach for neem use. We do note, however, that 81.7% of TLE participants post-test answers on the waiting time after water treatment with bleach for cholera prevention item were incorrect compared to 3.3% on the same item for LAV group participants. Although the TLE error was not statistically significant, the wide post-test difference suggests that video animations may better foster information retention. We discuss this possibility more below.The results from this study echo and extend on previous studies (Bello-Bravo & Baoua, 2012;Bello-Bravo et al., 2011, 2013) conducted on the reception of SAWBO animated videos among a variety of rural and suburban populations across several African nations (Benin, Burkina Faso, Niger, and Ethiopia). SAWBO videos have been introduced to groups of farmers, traders, students, and technicians with a range of educational backgrounds and literacy levels. Data from these studies show that, across the board, the videos are well received, with most viewers suggesting that they would use and share the videos with their communities (Bello-Bravo & Baoua, 2012;Bello-Bravo et al., 2013, 2015). Part of this is due to convenience and frequency of access; once saved to widely available cell phones, the information is easily shared with others and generally constantly on-hand (compared to always carrying around printed/pamphlet information). But another part is the consistency and integrity of the information; that is, learning gains \"saved\" to individual memory are subject to degradation, modification, and being received as less authoritative by others. Instead, to replay a video animation on a cell phone to a new learner almost perfectly reproduces the opportunities for gains that the person sharing the video previously experienced.This speaks to the great potential of these animated videos for addressing not only persistent health and agricultural issues that plague much of the developing world but also critical disaster relief needs (Miresmailli et al., 2015) and the needs of underserved populations in more industrialized nations as well. These findings, moreover and coupled with this previous work (Bello-Bravo & Baoua, 2012;Bello-Bravo et al., 2011, 2013, 2015), strongly suggest that the same animated visuals can be effectively used across diverse cultural groups, modified only by voice overlays in appropriate, locally accented languages.The data from this most recent study in Benin show that, in addition to being well received by local communities, those who watched animated videos retained more information than those presented the same information via a TLE agent presentation. These results support theories that multimedia educational tools, such as narrated animation, produce increased retention and comprehension of new skills and knowledge among learners, particularly for learners without much prior knowledge on the topic at hand (Mayer, 2002). Mayer's (2002) cognitive theory of multimedia learning posits that meaningful learning occurs when audio and visual representations engage five cognitive processes at once; these are (1) selecting words, (2) selecting images, (3) organizing words, (4) organizing images, and (5) integrating new words and images with previous knowledge. Like the topics addressed in the neem, cholera, and malaria videos, Mayer's (2002) studies emphasize problem-solving knowledge and skills in situations where subjects are presented with information on how to do something and are then asked to perform the task or answer problem-solving, open-ended questions.In general, the SAWBO animations used in this study employ six out of the seven \"effects\" that Mayer (2002) outlines as supporting this cognitive theory of multimedia learning. These are (1) \"the multimedia effect\" of using words and images together; (2) \"the temporal continuity effect\" of simultaneous presentation of narration and animation;(3) \"the coherence effect,\" that is, a lack of extraneous sounds and information added to the animation; (4) \"the modality effect,\" which uses narration rather than written text; (5) \"the redundancy effect,\" that is, no redundancy of narration with written text (e.g. a lack of subtitles); and (6) \"the signaling effect,\" whereby animations explain a causal chain through the information provided.In general, Mayer (2002) finds that well-designed multimedia instruction fosters greater learning gains among low-knowledge learners. Our results support this, inasmuch as participants showed greater learning gains in areas (neem use and cholera prevention), they had lower previous knowledge compared to lower learning gains in areas (malaria prevention) of higher prior knowledge. This does not, of course, diminish the fact that learning gains occurred for malaria prevention as well. Knowles (1980) initially outlined four components of his theory of andragogy and later added two more steps (Knowles, 1984). The theory of andragogy comprises both assumptions about adult learning and a set of guidelines for practice. Its principles include (1) the need to know, (2) the learner's self-concept, (3) the role of the learner's previous experiences, (4) their readiness to learn, (5) their orientation to learn, and (6) their motivation to learn. Andragogical guidelines of practice for learning point to: (1) increasingly selfdirected learning, (2) that it develops from problems and life tasks, (3) the circumstance of learning by self and others, (4) that it is task-or problem-centered learning, (5) internal incentives, that is, curiosity, and (6) the learner's own perception about the what and the why of learning. Knowles's (1984) andragogical message is that adult learning is most effective when the students are meeting their level of context or knowledge, and that they will learn more rapidly when the topic and content they are studying shows immediate impact on their current life situation. In light of this theory, the deployment of SAWBO animations can become time-critical; that is, showing a neem animation prior to or during the cropping season has more immediate impact; deploying the malaria or cholera animations when it is predicted that such diseases may be a concern for localized contexts makes it more relevant. That video animations can be left behind on the phones of adult learners empowers people to locally access this information when it is most needed, even in the absence of an \"expert.\" Having such videos available thus meets all six principles and practices outlined by Knowles (1980Knowles ( , 1984) ) for adult learning in affected communities.In this research study, we aimed to compare learning gains delivered by animated videos compared to more TLE methods. We found not only that participants who watched a video animation demonstrated greater learning gains compared to those who attended a TLE presentation of the same information, but also that animation viewers more highly recommended them as a form of information sharing. As such, not only were animated video more effective, because they can be easily shared on widely available mobile technology (cell phones), they are also more likely to be shared amongst members of different communities.Both points remained true across a wide cross-section of people of varying educational levels, age, gender, and marital status. That is, learning gains were surprisingly consistent across these variations, as can be seen by the relatively small standard errors observed in all the post-treatment tests (Figures 1-3). Given that for most of the groups tested, the majority of participants had little to no formalized education, this holds out the promise that video animations are useable within the widely varying demographic context of rural African villages. Future studies might well focus on more narrowly characterizing learning gains within specific demographic groups.While these results support the idea that video animations comprise an effective and popular form of information delivery, further studies to determine the most logical pathways for deployment of this approach in Beninas well as measures around the longer term application of the learning gains attainedstill need to be performed.This research also raises important questions about the challenges of access to and distribution of knowledge among underserved populations. Our findings suggest that there is great potential in creating animated videos, translated into locally accented languages, as educational material that may then be \"mobilized\" by farmers and other populations on widely available cell phones in Africa.For countries like Benin where mobile phone use is high, but Internet connectivity remains low (World Bank, 2014), while all SAWBO animations are available for download via the Internet, they remain sharable without it. Animations can be brought into a community on a single device and then spread to other cell phones using Bluetooth ® technology or simply viewed by many people on one phone. Such transition points from online to offline deployment may involve actors (such as agricultural extension agents, researchers, educators, librarians, non-governmental organizations, and civil society) who work with farmers.Further research, including a more qualitative analysis of why the respondents thought videos were a more appropriate way to share knowledge, would shed much-needed light onto how best to harness mobile and animation technology for the kind of educational purposes described above and as a way to address critical health, agricultural, and development issues world-wide. It was not the purpose of this research to explicitly elicit this why through quantitatively extracted data. Nor does this research claim that expressions of such interest in sharing will actually occur; this is an area for future, follow-up research. Nonetheless, inasmuch as changes of behavior must begin with changes of thinking and expressions of intention to change, the results here then are promising and warrant future research. And, lastly, whether participants re-share videos with an intention to educate or simply amuse othersor both, in the spirit of Horace's dictum that art should \"delight and instruct\" is less important than the fact of sharing and further disseminating the information in the first place. Since the \"authority\" of the information in the videos resides in its scientifically developed content, simply to replay the video to oneself or others re-produces the original learning environment on the spot and effectively makes each person sharing the video into a kind of teacher."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2678864995.json b/main/part_2/2678864995.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef20e65388a39b4731045fe8e67926e5c6f5e17e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2678864995.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"67add0104bbbf29e35c3fe3583537642","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/aa78804e-0e57-4d5e-a23f-115a4b74d04a/retrieve","id":"1420183072"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2f2b7953-f211-4f8d-8b44-8d3a8b697ec5","content":"Tropical (CIAT) -miembro del Consorcio CGIAR-desarrolla tecnologías, métodos innovadores y nuevos conocimientos que contribuyen a que los agricultores, en especial los de escasos recursos, logren una agricultura eco-eficiente -es decir, competitiva y rentable así como sostenible y resiliente. Con su sede principal cerca de Cali, Colombia, el CIAT realiza investigación orientada al desarrollo en las regiones tropicales de América Latina, África y Asia. www.ciat.cgiar.org CGIAR es una alianza mundial de investigación para un futuro sin hambre. Su labor científica la llevan a cabo los 15 centros de investigación que integran el Consorcio CGIAR, en colaboración con cientos de organizaciones socias.La construcción de este documento se logró gracias al interés y participación activa de los diferentes actores municipales que se involucraron en este proceso. Estos agradecimientos son en especial para Mónica Gómez, Profesional de la UMATA, quien amablemente apoyó y promovió la realización de las actividades programadas; y a todas las instituciones que asistieron a los diferentes espacios, por su valiosa asesoría y acompañamiento en el ejercicio metodológico proporcionado para obtener resultados claros y ordenados en este proceso de adaptación a la variabilidad y al cambio climático.Los actores municipales representaron una fuente invaluable de información para identificar los posibles proyectos municipales de adaptación que aquí se presentan. El cambio climático es uno de los problemas más complejos a los que se enfrentan las comunidades actualmente. Por lo tanto, hacerle frente implica acciones que involucren el conocimiento de los actores desde el nivel local hasta el nacional. En ese sentido, la gestión del Cambio Climático se convierte en un proceso continuo de largo plazo, que debe abarcar de manera transversal los territorios, los sectores productivos e institucionales y a los grupos humanos, considerando como prioridad la adaptación, ya que de no actuar hoy los impactos económicos, sociales y ambientales serán mayores a futuro.Teniendo en cuenta que todo proceso de gestión y adaptación al cambio climático debe entenderse como un proceso de planificación local para que se convierta en una alternativa de adaptación efectiva, tal como lo señala el Plan Nacional de Adaptación al Cambio Climático (PNACC) en su documento \"ABC: Adaptación Bases Conceptuales\" (DNP, 2012), \"es fundamental contar con información local, dado que cada territorio enfrenta retos particulares debido al cambio y la variabilidad climática. Asimismo, es indispensable vincular la participación comunitaria en el proceso de planificación y definición de medidas de adaptación para lograr una adaptación más efectiva y duradera, ya que son las comunidades las que mejor conocen sus características y necesidades\".Por todo lo anterior, la Corporación Autónoma Regional del Valle del Cauca (CVC) y el Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) vienen desarrollando Portafolios de Estrategias para la Mitigación y Adaptación al Cambio Climático, los cuales tienen como principal objetivo hacer de los municipios, territorios más resilientes y con mayor capacidad adaptativa, lo cual permitirá que los efectos del cambio climático se reduzcan generando un mayor desarrollo y progreso en las comunidades.Municipio de Dagua -Valle del CaucaEl calentamiento en el clima es inequívoco. Desde 1950 se han observado cambios en el sistema climático que no tienen precedente, tanto si se comparan con registros históricos observacionales que datan de mediados del siglo XIX, como si se comparan con registros paleoclimáticos referidos a los últimos milenios. La atmósfera y los océanos se han calentado, la cantidad de extensión de las masas de hielo y nieve han disminuido, el nivel del mar ha subido y las concentraciones de gases de efecto invernadero han aumentado (IPCC, 2014).Por lo anterior, según resultados del Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático (IPCC, por sus siglas en inglés), se prevé que en 2100 el mundo pueda llegar a tener dos grados más de temperatura, bajo un escenario de conservación, en donde todos actuemos responsablemente con el medio ambiente.Las profundas consecuencias ambientales, económicas y sociales, y las secuelas que puede dejar el cambio climático, se presentarán en mayor medida si los territorios no actúan de manera planificada. La adopción oportuna de medidas apropiadas para reducir los impactos de este fenómeno es un aspecto estratégico, pues cada vez será más difícil enfrentar sus consecuencias, y la capacidad de recuperación ante escenarios de desastre será menor.Los portafolios de adaptación municipales surgen por esa necesidad de adaptación desde \"lo local\", que permita establecer acciones y estrategias enmarcadas en el contexto específico de cada territorio, que a su vez permita dar respuesta a las problemáticas propias que presenta cada comunidad, dada su exposición, amenazas y vulnerabilidad.El municipio de Dagua se encuentra ubicado al occidente del departamento del Valle del Cauca, a 3° 39' 37\" de latitud norte y 76° 41' 34\" de longitud Es uno de los tres municipios más grandes del Valle del Cauca, junto con Buenaventura y Calima; el territorio en su mayoría es montañoso y su relieve corresponde a oeste entre los municipios de Buenaventura, Restrepo, La Cumbre, Calima -Darién y Santiago de Cali.la cordillera occidental de los Andes, condiciones que favorecen las siguientes características hidroclimáticas.Municipio de Dagua -Valle del CaucaCuadro 2. División político-administrativa y extensión territorial.La división político-administrativa del municipio está distribuida de la siguiente manera: 27 corregimientos, 101 veredas y 20 barrios en la cabecera municipal. AFuente: Plan Básico de Ordenamiento Territorial 2001-2009.continuación se presenta de manera más detallada cada una de las divisiones. En el municipio de Dagua se distinguen dos grandes unidades climáticas: la primera, que es enmarcada por la cuenca hidrográfica del río Dagua, y la segunda, referida a la cuenca del río Anchicayá.Gran parte de la cuenca del río Dagua presenta características climáticas propias de la franja tropical, con gran influencia del Océano Pacífico, por lo cual circulan corrientes de aire en dos direcciones: del mar hacia el continente provenientes del Océano Pacífico con dirección sudoeste y noreste, que son transportadoras de humedad y que son descargadas, según el relieve, en forma de precipitaciones fuertes en la parte baja más cercana al mar y en forma de vapor de agua en las partes más altas de la cordillera occidental de la cuenca, de acuerdo con la fisiografía del terreno.Por otra parte, en la zona del río Anchicayá el clima se enmarca dentro de las características de la Costa Pacífica vallecaucana, es decir, de tipo tropical, que corresponden a altas temperaturas, aunque no excesivas y aire húmedo, debido al alto nivel de la humedad relativa y abundantes lluvias, siendo ésta la característica más sobresaliente.La red hidrográfica principal del municipio está comprendida por los ríos Dagua y Anchicayá. En consecuencia, alrededor de 59.000 hectáreas, el 61% de la extensión territorial, corresponden a la parte alta de la cuenca del río Dagua, y el 31% restante pertenece a la zona media de la cuenca del río Anchicayá. Según esto, la distribución del sistema hídrico se representa así: El municipio presenta un régimen climático con una distribución bimodal de la precipitación con dos períodos de valores máximos relativos y dos de mínimos relativos, influenciado ese tipo de distribución por los desplazamientos de la zona de Confluencia Intertropical; el primer período lluvioso se presenta entre los meses de marzo y mayo; el segundo sucede entre los meses de septiembre y noviembre. De igual forma, los períodos secos se presentan entre los meses de enero y febrero y julio y agosto.Fuente: Elaboración propia basada en cartografía CVC (2010). El municipio de Dagua presenta dos formaciones geológicas: la formación Cisneros, compuesta por intercalaciones sedimentarias metamorfizadas, y la formación Espinal, conformada por rocas sedimentarias. Las formaciones volcánicas diabasicas están compuestas por diabasas, lavas basálticas y lavas almohadilladas, incluyendo silos de dolerita y con numerosos horizontales de rocas sedimentarias.El municipio presenta un complejo sistema de fallas interconectadas de orientación nororientesuroccidente (NE-SW) que forman una red densa de bloques litológicos de formas romboidales orientadas.Las principales fallas que atraviesan la cuenca del río Dagua son: falla Dagua -Calima, falla del río Bravo y falla río Blanco -El Naranjo; sin embargo, se presentan numerosas fallas menores que confluyen entre sí a manera de cuñas según la dirección general noreste-sudoeste. Distrito de conservación de suelos Cañón de Cuadro 5. Uso potencial del suelo en el municipio de Dagua.Fuente: Elaboración propia, datos tomados de cartografía CVC (2010).Figura 5. Uso potencial del suelo en el municipio de Dagua.Fuente: Elaboración propia basada en cartografía CVC (2010). Teniendo en cuenta la información cartográfica de la CVC del año 2010, el municipio presenta las siguientes coberturas:Cuadro 7. Coberturas del municipio de Dagua.Figura 7. Cobertura del suelo en el municipio de Dagua.Fuente: Elaboración propia basada en cartografía CVC (2010). El municipio de Dagua presenta 10 ecosistemas y 5 biomas, descritos en la cartografía regional de la CVC El sector agrícola es el eje más importante de la economía dagueña y se sustenta en cultivos de Cuadro 9. Área sembrada, area cosechada y rendimiento de cultivos perennes.Fuente: Agronet (2013).Cuadro 10. Área sembrada, area cosechada y rendimiento de cultivos transitorios para los dos semestres del año 2013.a. AS: área sembrada; AC: área cosechada; Pr: producción; Rto: rendimiento.Fuente: Agronet (2013). Es importante resaltar que la piña se ha convertido en un producto de gran importancia económica. Muestra de ello es el aumento de hectáreas sembradas (Figura 9) desde 2007 a 2013. Además de los beneficios económicos que genera este cultivo, Dagua cuenta con excelentes suelos, los cuales junto con su clima son los más adecuados para realizar esta actividad agrícola, convirtiéndose en uno de los municipios que más producen piña en el país, que ha llevado a ganar un reconocimiento por la calidad de este producto.Fuente: Elaboración propia, datos tomados de Agronet (2013). La ganadería, la explotación forestal, la avicultura, la producción de leche y sus derivados también son actividades económicas importantes para el municipio. En el Cuadro 11 se presenta la composición productiva animal de Dagua para 2013.Existen cuatro problemas específicos de manejo que afectan la productividad futura de la industria, aunque ninguno de ellos ha llegado aún a ser muy importante en magnitud; estos son: la erosión, compactación y el deterioro en la actividad microbiológica del suelo y la producción como monocultivo. La alta erosión se ve ocasionada por varios factores, entre los cuales los más importantes son la mala escogencia del área de siembra y las prácticas de preparación de los terrenos para siembra (Quijandría et al., 1997).La vía Cali-Buenaventura genera beneficios para Dagua por ser paso obligado de los viajeros generando importantes ingresos económicos para las personas que laboran en restaurantes, puestos de venta de comidas rápidas y talleres de automóviles, que están ubicados a la orilla de la carretera. Gran parte de los impactos sociales y las pérdidas económicas asociados a eventos climáticos están relacionados con la exposición y la vulnerabilidad; ambas son determinantes claves del riesgo.El riesgo depende del tipo de amenaza, del nivel de exposición y de las condiciones de vulnerabilidadEl riesgo climático está dado en función de tres factores:• Amenaza/Peligros (eventos climáticos)• Exposición Este manual hace referencia a que los PNA (programa nacional de adaptación) deben prepararse mediante un proceso participativo que incluya, en particular, a las comunidades locales.Con ese fin, las directrices proponen que se establezca un equipo nacional para el PNA, compuesto por un organismo principal y por representantes de las partes interesadas, incluidos organismos gubernamentales y la sociedad civil. El equipo nacional para el PNA designará un equipo más amplio y multidisciplinario al que encomendará la mayoría de las tareas.En Colombia, la adaptación es una prioridad en la política ambiental nacional. La principal herramienta de política pública sobre cambio climático en Colombia es el CONPES 3700 de 2011, en el cual se originan cuatro estrategias para hacer frente a la problemática del cambio climático:• La Estrategia de Desarrollo Bajo en Carbono (mitigación)• El Plan Nacional de Adaptación al Cambio Climático (Adaptación).• La Estrategia Nacional REDD (Reducción de Emisiones por Deforestación y Degradación Forestal Evitada)• La Estrategia Nacional de Reducción del Riesgo Financiero del Estado ante la Ocurrencia de Desastres Naturales.(Continúa)http://bit.ly/1PsXw6MCONPES 3700: Estrategia institucional para la articulación de políticas y acciones en materia de cambio climático en Colombia La mitigación y adaptación al cambio climático requieren del desarrollo de estrategias de articulación, tanto a nivel sectorial como en los ámbitos nacional y territorial, con el fin de generar una gestión compartida y coordinada, y de la información pertinente y oportuna para la toma de decisiones, para así contrarrestar de manera efectiva los problemas subyacentes.A Busca incidir en los procesos de planificación ambiental, territorial y sectorial, de tal manera que se tomen decisiones de manera informada, teniendo en cuenta los determinantes y proyecciones climáticos, reduciendo así efectivamente la vulnerabilidad tanto en poblaciones, ecosistemas y sectores productivos a este fenómeno, y aumentando la capacidad social, económica y ecosistémica para responder ante eventos y desastres climáticos.Estrategia Colombiana de Desarrollo Bajo en Carbono (ECDBC)Es un programa de planeación del desarrollo a corto, mediano y largo plazo que busca desligar el crecimiento de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI) del crecimiento económico nacional. Esto se hará a través del diseño y la implementación de planes, proyectos y políticas que tiendan a la mitigación de GEI y simultáneamente fortalezcan el crecimiento social y económico del país, dando cumplimiento a los estándares mundiales de eficiencia, competitividad y desempeño ambiental. Climático es la herramienta mediante la cual se va a poder medir el riesgo a los eventos hidrometeorológicos extremos y definir las acciones y proyectos que deberán implementar los diferentes actores a nivel regional para reducir la vulnerabilidad ante estos fenómenos.En cuanto a los programas y subprogramas del plan, 4 de 31 programas incorporan de alguna forma actividades tendientes a la gestión del cambio y la variabilidad climática, y 5 de 98 subprogramas de los programas relacionados incorporan en las metas de producto actividades tendientes a la gestión del cambio y la variabilidad climática.Análisis de vulnerabilidad para los Nodos Regionales de Cambio Climático (NRCC) 2011El Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM) presenta en el año 2011 el documento sobre análisis de vulnerabilidad para los Nodos Regionales de Cambio Climático, en donde hace relación al Nodo Regional del Eje Cafetero, específicamente en el apartado sobre vulnerabilidad, que establece lo siguiente:3 En este nodo, los climas muy húmedos y húmedos se reducirán para el período 2011-2040, dando paso a la ampliación de climas semihúmedos y semiáridos.3 El índice de sensibilidad permite ver que predomina una categoría de sensibilidad media en el territorio, lo que genera, después de asumir la capacidad que tiene la región cafetera para adaptarse, una predominancia de alta vulnerabilidad en las diferentes corporaciones que la conforman.3 El Nodo Regional de Cambio Climático del Eje Cafetero en general tenderá a una disminución leve de la escorrentía para el período 2011-2040 (entre -30 a -10%), excepto la Sub Zona Hidrográfica del Río San Juan en la jurisdicción de la CARDER, donde la afectación al rendimiento hídrico podría ser aún más leve (-10 a 10%).Análisis de vulnerabilidad para la cuenca alta del río Cauca -AVA. \"Desarrollo compatible con el clima en el sector agrícola del Alto Cauca colombiano\" (CDKN et al., 2013) Reconociendo el deterioro ambiental y la importancia de la seguridad alimentaria en un entorno cambiante, se crea la iniciativa AVA -\"Agricultura, Vulnerabilidad y Adaptación\", de la mano del Sector Agropecuario y Ambiental, trabajando con las gobernaciones, municipios, corporaciones autónomas regionales, academia y centros de investigación. AVA tuvo como objetivo desarrollar una metodología que permitiera cuantificar y analizar la vulnerabilidad del territorio y de los sistemas productivos, para apoyar la planificación integral de los procesos productivos, la sostenibilidad y la conservación de la cuenca alta del río Cauca.Por medio de la metodología de AVA se midió la Vulnerabilidad del Sector Agrícola para los sistemas productivos de café, cacao, papa, plátano, frijol y caña de azúcar en 99 municipios que conforman la cuenca alta del río Cauca de los departamentos de Caldas, Risaralda, Quindío, Valle del Cauca y Cauca. En el Valle del Cauca se realizó en 33 municipios, entre ellos Alcalá, presentándose en éste un índice de vulnerabilidad muy bajo de 0,9 en caña azúcar, bajo de 2,6-5,39 y 9,29 en plátano, papa y fríjol, respectivamente, medio de 27,5 en café, y muy alto de 9,63 en cacao.Plan de desarrollo de Dagua \"Mi Dagua con visión de futuro y libre de pobreza extrema\" 2012-2015El Plan de desarrollo de Dagua \"Mi Dagua con visión de futuro y libre de pobreza extrema\" 2012-2015, plantea algunas acciones en el marco de la adaptación al cambio climático, tales como: 3 Al terminar el cuatrenio se ha implementado un programa para contribuir a la sostenibilidad del desarrollo a través de la reducción del impacto del cambio climático en la población y su entorno mediante acciones de conservación de recursos hídricos.3 Al terminar el cuatrenio se ha reducido la vulnerabilidad al cambio climático mediante la inclusión de un programa que integre las consideraciones de riesgo en el desarrollo municipal.Municipio de Dagua -Valle del CaucaEl principal objetivo del portafolio es entregar información verídica, actualizada y útil en torno a las problemáticas del cambio climático no solo a los tomadores de decisiones locales, sino a toda la comunidad. Esta información contenida en el portafolio permitirá incluir acciones de adaptación en los procesos de planificación local, lo cual generará hacer de los municipios, territorios más resilientes y con mayor capacidad de adaptación ante los efectos del cambio climático.El presente documento busca generar un conjunto de acciones de adaptación priorizadas teniendo en cuenta los criterios de adaptación previamente identificados como relevantes según los actores del municipio. Dichas acciones de adaptación, como se planteó anteriormente en la metodología, tienen en cuenta las características biofísicas, sociales, económicas, políticas, entre otras, del municipio, lo cual permite que dichas acciones respondan a necesidades específicas del municipio. Estas acciones deben ser implementadas en conjunto por los diferentes actores del municipio, lo cual implica que la articulación institucional es determinante en el proceso de adaptación.Al igual que en el proceso de adaptación nacional liderado por el Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM) y el Ministerio del Ambiente, compilado en el Plan Nacional de Adaptación de 2012, y en el CONPES 3700 de 2011, este portafolio pretende generar lineamientos conceptuales y acciones específicas que respondan a las necesidades puntuales del territorio.Es así como la Corporación Autónoma Regional del Valle del Cauca (CVC), preocupada y comprometida con la planificación y gestión del cambio climático local, ha venido desarrollando una serie de ejercicios tendientes a la construcción participativa de \"portafolios de adaptación al cambio climático\" en diferentes municipios del Valle del Cauca.Este proceso inició en el año 2013 con la construcción de los portafolios de Tuluá y Guadalajara de Buga, mediante convenio con la Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca (UCEVA) y, más recientemente, mediante convenio interadministrativo No. 033 de 2014 con el Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), el cual tiene como objeto aunar esfuerzos y recursos humanos, económicos y técnicos para realizar acciones en el marco de la mitigación y adaptación al cambio climático en el Valle del Cauca. Se han realizado los portafolios para Cartago y Alcalá, Cali, Jamundí, Dagua, Restrepo y Buenaventura.También es importante recalcar que el portafolio de adaptación debe ser actualizado conforme se vayan modificando las necesidades ambientales, sociales, económicas y políticas del municipio, en aras de que el proceso sea continuo y ayude a evaluar los avances y logros obtenidos, y de esta manera se puedan incorporar nuevas iniciativas en función de las modificaciones reales del clima y los pronósticos de cambio climático.En este punto se presenta de forma general el procedimiento metodológico usado para la construcción del portafolio de adaptación a la variabilidad y cambio climático del municipio de Dagua, Valle del Cauca.El proceso constó de nueve fases. En la fase 1 se llevó a cabo una reunión inicial que permitió recolectar información municipal relacionada con procesos y políticas de adaptación. En la fase 2 se desarrolló un taller participativo con el fin de recopilar información primaria a través de dos métodos, tales como la cartografía social y la prospectiva territorial. Posteriormente en una tercera fase se cruzó la información generada en el taller participativo con cartografía oficial obtenida de la CVC, el IGAC, el IDEAM, etc. En la fase 4 se generaron escenarios de cambio climático a nivel municipal, pasando a la fase 5, la cual consiste en la identificación de principales amenazas y riesgos climáticos por municipio. La etapa o fase 6 es la más importante, la cual consiste en generar y priorizar las acciones de adaptación con base en toda la información anteriormente evaluada y analizada. Posteriormente se realiza una socialización de los resultados con los actores del municipio (fase 7), lo cual es el insumo principal para realizar la retroalimentación del portafolio (fase 8), y finalmente se genera el portafolio de estrategias de adaptación al cambio climático para el municipio (fase 9). En la Figura 12, se presenta un resumen del procedimiento metodológico. 7. Socialización con los actores del municipio.6. Generación y priorización de acciones de adaptación al cambio climático. • Análisis jerárquico.a través del taller participativo que involucró dos metodologías: • Cartografía social.• Prospectiva territorial.en las consideraciones de los actores del municipio.5. Identificación de principales amenazas y riesgos climáticos por municipio.3. Análisis de la información generada y cruce con información geográfica oficial.9. Generación del Portafolio de Estrategías de Adaptación a Nivel Municipal.4. Generación de escenarios de cambio climático a nivel municipal.Municipio de Dagua -Valle del CaucaPara el desarrollo de dicho proceso en cuanto a la prospectiva territorial se utilizaron siete instrumentos metodológicos, los cuales se explican a continuación. Sin embargo, dicha información fue complementaria a la cartografía social, la cual permitió identificar zonas de riesgo y zonas donde podrían llevarse a cabo procesos de adaptación.Formato 1. Análisis de actores, con el objetivo de realizar la identificación de los actores del proceso, su modo de participación y capacidades en la construcción del portafolio de medidas de adaptación. (Para mayor información consultar el Anexo 1. Formato 1: Análisis de actores).Formato 2. Identificación de acciones/proyectos, el cual tiene como objetivo obtener la información necesaria acerca de los proyectos conocidos. (Para mayor información consultar el Anexo 2. Formato 2: Identificación de acciones/proyectos). Formato 3. Cambios esperados para el futuro (tecnológicos, económicos, sociales, ambientales, institucionales y organizacionales), con el objetivo de identificar los cambios en el municipio relacionados con el cambio climático y la variabilidad climática. (Para mayor información consultar el Anexo 3. Formato 3: Cambios esperados para el futuro). Formato 5. Ideas/factores más importantes, con el objetivo de identificar, según el conocimiento sobre el tema, cuáles eran las ideas más importantes en las que se deben enfocar las acciones y/o proyectos en cambio climático. (Para mayor información consultar el Anexo 5. Formato 5: Ideas/factores más importantes). Formato 6. Propuesta de acciones, el cual tiene como objetivo identificar las acciones y/o proyectos que aportarían al manejo o solución del factor establecido. (Para mayor información consultar el Anexo 6. Formato 6: Propuesta de acciones).Formato 7. Formato de valoración de criterios para la selección de medidas y proyectos de adaptación al cambio y variabilidad climática. Metodología de Análisis Jerárquico (AHP), el cual consiste en establecer la importancia de cada uno de los criterios que se han definido para la calificación y selección de medidas y proyectos de adaptación al cambio y la variabilidad climática en su municipio. (Para mayor información consultar el Anexo 7. Formato 7: Análisis Jerárquico, AHP).De acuerdo con la evaluación general de la percepción de los actores sobre la realidad municipal frente a la variabilidad y al cambio climático, se presentan entonces los cambios presentidos, anhelados y temidos percibidos por los actores para el municipio.• Desabastecimiento de agua en el municipio por aumento de la deforestación en la quebrada El Cogollo.• Presencia de minería.• Vendavales en corregimientos del municipio.• Pérdida de biodiversidad.• Disminución del caudal y socavamiento de los ríos.• Desbordamiento de fuentes hídricas.• Aumento de incendios forestales.• Intensificación de la contaminación por vertimientos y residuos sólidos.• Afectaciones a sistemas productivos agrícolas y pecuarios.• Pérdida de cobertura vegetal.• Escasez de agua.• Cambio de uso del suelo.• Deterioro de la economía local.• Formulación y ejecución de los planes de manejo y ordenación de cuencas hidrográficas (POMCA's).• Planes de conservación y protección para la Reserva Forestal del Pacífico y el Parque Nacional Natural Farallones de Cali.• Actualización del plan básico de ordenamiento territorial.• Renovación del plan de gestión integral de residuos sólidos.• Programas de reforestación en áreas cercanas a las fuentes hídricas.• Establecer la protección de predios civiles.• Fomentar la cooperación interinstitucional.• Control y aplicación de la normatividad vigente.• Disminución drástica de la oferta hídrica.• Contaminación y pérdida de ecosistemas.• Aumento de las plantaciones forestales.• Deslizamientos.• Deterioro de la calidad de vida.• Aumento de la temperatura.• Extinción de especies vegetales y animales.• Conflictos sociales ocasionados por la distribución y manejo del agua potable.• Capacitar y sensibilizar a la población acerca del uso racional de los recursos energéticos renovables.Municipio de Dagua -Valle del CaucaEl perfil POAM elaborado permite analizar el entorno municipal frente a aspectos externos. La síntesis de estos y la especialización de las amenazas se presenta a continuación:• Vinculación de la academia y centros de investigación para desarrollar proyectos encaminados a la adaptación al cambio climático.• Inclusión de los jóvenes de la comunidad en los procesos ambientales.• Alta riqueza en recursos hídricos, especies animales y vegetales.• Promover el ecoturismo en la región.• Establecer sistemas productivos sostenibles.• Fortalecimiento de las organizaciones comunitarias.• Participación en el nodo regional de cambio climático para articularse con los otros municipios.• Implementar sistemas alternativos para producción de energía.• Potenciar nuevos productos agrícolas aprovechando la variabilidad climática.• Vinculación de los sectores público y privado del municipio para el desarrollo de iniciativas de adaptación y mitigación.• Deficiente participación de la autoridad ambiental en el municipio.• Desabastecimiento de agua en el municipio por aumento de la deforestación en la quebrada El Cogollo.• Desarrollo de minería a gran escala en la zona alta del río Dagua y baja del río Anchicayá; que genere contaminación de los ecosistemas, socavamientos y pérdida de biodiversidad.• Incremento de la contaminación de los ríos y suelos a causa de vertimientos, residuos sólidos y uso indiscriminado de agroquímicos.• Eventos extremos de precipitación que ocasionan escasez de agua o desbordamientos.• Incremento de cultivos en laderas y ganadería extensiva.• Parcelación de predios y cambio de uso del suelo con fines agrícolas.• Manejo y disposición final inadecuada de residuos sólidos.• Impactos ambientales y sociales graves ocasionados por un posible desequilibrio de la falla geológica en el municipio.• Disminución del caudal de los ríos ocasionado por el incremento de monocultivos de pino y eucalipto.• Aumento de la erosión en el municipio generada por la poca cobertura vegetal, los eventos naturales y las prácticas agrícolas inadecuadas.• Bajo interés social en los procesos ambientales que conciernen al municipio.• Extensión de la frontera agrícola y pecuaria.• Deficiente implementación de sistemas adecuados de riego debido a la baja capacitación y formación de las personas encargadas.• Pérdida de suelo, cobertura y biodiversidad a causa de la construcción de la vía doble calzada.• Incremento de incendios forestales.• Alteraciones antrópicas en las zonas protectoras de las quebradas Ambichita y La Clorinda.Figura 13. Amenazas identificadas para el municipio de Dagua.Fuente: Elaboración propia basada en cartografía CVC (2010). El perfil de capacidad interna (PCI) permite tener una visión global de la situación interna del municipio paraPartiendo del hecho que el cambio climático es un fenómeno que afectará toda la población, es necesario resaltar la participación y el compromiso interinstitucional de todos los actores presentes en el municipio de Dagua; y así desarrollar e implementar acciones y medidas de adaptación al cambio climático en forma integral y localizada.Teniendo en cuenta esto se presentan a continuación los diferentes actores que participaron en la construcción del portafolio de adaptación al cambio climático: Empresa de Energía del Pacífico (EPSA), Asociación de Productores y Comercializadores de Atuncela (ASOPROCAT), Asociación de Usuarios de Servicio de Agua Potable y Alcantarillado de El Queremal (ASUAQ), Unidad Ejecutora de Saneamiento (UES), Unidad Municipal de Asistencia Técnica Agropecuaria (UMATA), y las presentadas en la Figura 14. Figura 14. Mapa de participación de actores en la construcción del portafolio para el municipio de Dagua.hacer frente al cambio climático, ya que facilita la identificación de las medidas apropiadas para la adaptación.• Condiciones climáticas y ubicación geográfica estratégica del municipio para el desarrollo de proyectos de adaptación.• Presencia de parques nacionales naturales.• Implementación de nuevas tecnologías productivas.• Compromiso interinstitucional.• Implementación de buenas prácticas agrícolas.• Promoción de la cultura ambiental desde las instituciones educativas.• Presencia del comité técnico interinstitucional de educación ambiental (CIDEA).• Investigación por parte de universidades y organizaciones sociales para el aprovechamiento y desarrollo sostenible de los recursos del municipio.• Manejo inadecuado del uso del suelo.• Ganadería extensiva.• Bajo financiamiento para el control de políticas ambientales.• Ausencia de planta de tratamiento de aguas residuales.• Desarticulación de iniciativas ambientales en el municipio.• No hay planes de respuesta y contingencia ante fenómenos naturales.• Baja continuidad en los procesos que se desarrollan.• Poco reconocimiento de la importancia de los impactos asociados con el cambio climático.• Poco interés social para el trabajo colectivo en acciones para la adaptación y la mitigación. El análisis de la participación de los actores mostró que el 72% de los asistentes pertenece a organizaciones públicas, el 21% a organizaciones privadas y el 7% a organizaciones sociales, quedando excluidos los sectores academia, organizaciones no gubernamentales y sociedad civil. Cabe entonces resaltar la necesidad de promover la participación amplia de estos últimos para garantizar que los procesos se desarrollen de manera íntegra y conjunta. La Figura 17 representa el porcentaje de recursos ofertados por los actores para el proceso de implementación del portafolio, obteniendo el mayor aporte el de recursos humanos con un 80%, seguido de los recursos físicos con un 13% y por último los recursos económicos con un 7%. Lo anterior evidencia que existe una amplia disposición de participar en el proceso. Sin embargo, es necesario buscar fuentes económicas que puedan soportar la implementación del portafolio con los tomadores de decisión y la participación de las instituciones presentes en el municipio.En cuanto al análisis de la participación en las fases del proceso de gestión del cambio climático a escala local, se encontró que el mayor interés se encuentra en las fases de formulación e implementación, representadas con un 42% cada una; la fase de seguimiento, representada con un 11%, y finalmente la fase de evaluación, con un 5%. Es importante resaltar el compromiso de los actores en las primeras fases. Sin embargo, sería ideal que se asignara el mismo interés en todas las fases para así darle continuidad al proceso. En este capítulo se realiza una revisión y análisis de los reportes relacionados con la variabilidad y el cambio climático en el departamento del Valle del Cauca y el municipio de Dagua durante el último quinquenio.Las amenazas climáticas de mayor frecuencia en la actualidad para el departamento, en lo que respecta al último quinquenio son, de mayor a menor: las En comparación con otros municipios del departamento, Dagua se ubica en el sexto lugar en materia de concentración de desastres por eventos relacionados con variabilidad y cambio climático en el Valle del Cauca. Este nivel de afectación es superado por los municipios de Buenaventura y Jamundí, con un número de personas afectadas que puede llegar a ser hasta 10 veces mayor que el que se presenta en el municipio de Dagua. 17% 17%Estos eventos climáticos sin duda configuran un riesgo en la medida en que afectan a los sistemas naturales y sociales.El total de personas afectadas entre 2010 y 2015 por las amenazas climáticas identificadas fue de 5.485, a septiembre del último año, según datos reportados ante la UNGRD (2015). El análisis de esta información antes descrita nos lleva a concluir que es necesario que se realicen acciones en torno a los problemas más importantes a nivel climático en el municipio, tales como los incendios forestales, los deslizamientos, las inundaciones y los vendavales, para así reducir la cifra de personas afectadas (5.485) en el último quinquenio. Sin duda, este portafolio se convierte en una herramienta fundamental para hacerle frente a estos fenómenos, teniendo en cuenta las amenazas particulares y las características del territorio. ejemplo, se espera que para el 27% del territorio nacional disminuya entre 20% y 30% en las zonas de Amazonas, Vaupés, sur del Caquetá, San Andrés y Providencia, Bolívar, Magdalena, Sucre y norte del Cesar, y aumente entre 10% y 30% en zonas como Nariño, Cauca, Huila, Tolima, Eje Cafetero, occidente de Antioquia, norte de Cundinamarca, Bogotá y centro de Boyacá.A continuación se muestran el cambio de temperatura y precipitación proyectados por el IDEAM en 2015 en la Tercera Comunicación Nacional de Cambio Climático (IDEAM et al., 2015). Este análisis tiene en cuenta diferentes horizontes temporales (entre 2011 y 2100). Se espera que la temperatura entre 2071 y 2100 aumente, en promedio, en 2. Para fin de siglo, el departamento podrá aumentar en 2,4 °C la temperatura promedio. En particular, el municipio de Buenaventura será el de mayor aumento, con valores de 2,6 °C adicionales a los valores de referencia actual (IDEAM et al., 2015).En general, el departamento podrá aumentar en 6% las precipitaciones sobre el valor actual. Particularmente, las provincias de occidente, sur y centro serán aquellas que presentan mayores aumentos, con valores hasta de un 20%, al igual que los municipios de Cartago, Ulloa, El Águila, Ansermanuevo y Alcalá (IDEAM et al., 2015).Las estimaciones de cambio climático también se realizaron a nivel de municipio desde el equipo de modelación climática del CIAT, y los resultados para Dagua, con el ensamble de modelos globales de cambio climático (GCMs, por sus siglas en inglés) son los siguientes: La temperatura del municipio de Dagua en la mayor parte del territorio se encuentra entre 20 y 25 °C. Sin embargo, la zona de la parte occidental en el límite con el municipio de Buenaventura presenta una temperatura promedio anual de 27 °C. Algo similar ocurre con las precipitaciones, las cuales son mayores en la parte sur y occidental.El cambio climático para el municipio de Dagua muestra aumentos en temperatura y precipitación, tanto en 2030 como en 2050. Para 2030 se estiman aumentos de temperatura de 1,3 °C y 9% en precipitaciones, mientras que para 2050 los aumentos serían de 1,8 °C en temperatura y de 11,8% en precipitaciones.En términos relativos (cambios %) se espera que la zona con mayores aumentos en precipitación sea la zona oriental del municipio que limita con La Cumbre. Dicha zona se ha caracterizado por bajas precipitaciones; sin embargo, se espera que a futuro en esta zona aumente la precipitación con respecto al valor actual.De acuerdo con estos cambios en temperatura y precipitación, se concluye que el municipio de Dagua tiene una gran exposición al cambio climático, lo cual hace necesario establecer medidas de adaptación que ayuden al municipio a mejorar su capacidad de adaptación y resiliencia. Figura 27. Esquema de organización y gestión para la implementación de medidas de adaptación en el marco del portafolio.El esquema anterior plantea la conformación de un grupo interinstitucional e intersectorial coordinador, asesor y gestor, encargado de la parte técnica, administrativa y toma de decisiones, en el marco de la promoción y desarrollo de las acciones para la adaptación al cambio climático.Dicho grupo optimizará los esfuerzos y recursos existentes, con el fin de evitar la duplicidad en las labores desempeñadas por los actores involucrados. Asimismo, es necesario establecer un mecanismo de retroalimentación entre ellos y los componentes que establecen el grupo de concertación. Es importante resaltar la necesidad de establecer una dirección administrativa que se encargue de apoyar los temas de comunicación, educación para el desarrollo y coordinación de las diferentes actividades, con el ánimo de llevar a cabo el buen funcionamiento del proceso.En síntesis, este esquema se presenta como una alternativa de organización y gestión para la implementación de medidas de adaptación al cambio climático, que busca facilitar la armonización de los procesos y realizar acciones interinstitucionales y sociales desde una orientación colectiva.Con el objetivo de implementar las acciones contenidas en el portafolio de adaptación y promover los mecanismos de administración, gestión y seguimiento, se sugiere el siguiente esquema de organización, que contempla la articulación institucional y la optimización de los recursos. A partir de los talleres realizados y de las indagaciones sobre información secundaria relacionada con medidas y proyectos formulados, en ejecución o en fase de formulación para la adaptación al cambio climático, y con el propósito de generar una priorización de aquellos identificados, se planteó la necesidad de asignar una importancia a los criterios de selección, que permitiera relacionar niveles de preferencia sobre los aspectos más relevantes en materia de adaptación para el municipio de Dagua. Todo ello desde el conocimiento local representado por los actores sociales y participantes del municipio.La metodología empleada para facilitar el proceso de toma de decisión frente a la configuración de un portafolio de adaptación fue el proceso analítico jerárquico (AHP). El AHP es un método de evaluación y decisión multicriterio, desarrollado por el matemático Thomas Saaty que consiste en formalizar la comprensión intuitiva de problemas complejos mediante la construcción de un modelo jerárquico. El propósito del método es permitir que el agente decisor pueda estructurar un problema multicriterio en forma visual, mediante la construcción de un modelo jerárquico que contiene tres niveles: meta u objetivo, criterios y alternativas (Hurtado y Bruno, 2005).El AHP se fundamenta en: • La estructuración de un modelo jerárquico (representación del problema mediante identificación de meta, criterios, subcriterios y alternativas).• Priorización de los elementos del modelo jerárquico.• Comparaciones binarias entre los elementos.• Evaluación de los elementos mediante asignación de \"pesos\".• Clasificación de las alternativas de acuerdo con los pesos dados.• Síntesis y análisis de resultados.El AHP hace posible la toma de decisiones grupal mediante el agregado de opiniones, de tal manera que satisfaga la relación recíproca al comparar dos elementos; luego toma el promedio geométrico de las opiniones. Cuando el grupo de expertos genera cada uno su propia jerarquía, el AHP combina los resultados por el promedio geométrico de las mismas (Saaty, 1997).Según esto, se presenta a continuación el desarrollo de este esquema metodológico para las medidas y proyectos identificados, así como los resultados de este proceso para el municipio de Dagua.La estructuración del modelo jerárquico para la priorización de las medidas y proyectos identificados se desarrolla a través de los siguientes componentes metodológicos, que configuran un proceso confiable para la toma de decisiones ante las actuales medidas o proyectos, y los futuros.En materia de adaptación al cambio climático son importantes los esfuerzos, recursos e inversiones sociales, que hacen parte de los contenidos programáticos de los instrumentos de planificación territorial; las agendas institucionales, los programas locales y las apuestas comunitarias. Todos estos de gran relevancia bajo un contexto general de adaptación. Sin embargo, no todas estas iniciativas responden en igual medida a las prioridades que para el municipio de Dagua puede representar el contexto sociocultural, ambiental y económico-político desde el cual busca una adaptación exitosa al cambio climático.Estas condiciones particulares, identificadas en la fase prospectiva de este ejercicio, contienen amenazas y vulnerabilidades que generan escenarios únicos ante los cuales adaptarse. Por tal motivo, resulta de interés la priorización de medidas y proyectos que respondan a criterios o componentes de mayor importancia para los autores del proceso de adaptación en el municipio, de tal manera que dichos esfuerzos generen impactos positivos para este en el corto y mediano plazo.El objetivo del AHP en este estudio es el de \"seleccionar las medidas o proyectos con mayor impacto potencial sobre las prioridades de mitigación y adaptación del municipio de Dagua\".Dichas alternativas responden a problemáticas relacionadas con el cambio y la variabilidad climática y configuran un portafolio de medidas y proyectos que responden a este propósito.El departamento del Valle del Cauca ha venido desarrollando en diferentes municipios portafolios de estrategias, medidas y proyectos de adaptación y mitigación, planteando con esto un referente para el abordaje de la temática desde un enfoque articulador y coherente con las perspectivas de los vallecaucanos.Fruto de estos procesos, y como resultado de diagnósticos participativos en los diferentes municipios, se evaluaron y validaron en Dagua siete (7) criterios por parte de los agentes claves involucrados en los talleres.Estos criterios fueron empleados para la calificación y selección de un número limitado de medidas y proyectos, los cuales conformarán el marco decisorio para la configuración del portafolio.En este sentido se muestra a continuación una pregunta clave y una breve descripción de cada uno de los criterios. El listado de los siete criterios se enuncia en un consecutivo desde el literal A hasta el G; el orden de estos es aleatorio y no corresponde a su importancia o jerarquía para la toma de la decisión.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto involucra procesos de adaptación relacionados con la soberanía y seguridad alimentaria ante la variabilidad y el cambio climático?Por medio de este criterio se busca priorizar proyectos y medidas relacionadas con la adaptación ecológica y cultural de los agroecosistemas a la variabilidad y al cambio climático, el reconocimiento y recuperación de saberes y prácticas productivas ancestrales que garanticen la soberanía y seguridad alimentaria ante el cambio climático.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto contempla adaptaciones, manejo o mitigación de riesgos relacionados con variabilidad y cambio climático?A través de este criterio se busca priorizar aquellas medidas y proyectos que involucran posibles adaptaciones desde la gestión del riesgo ante el cambio climático, involucrando obras de manejo y mitigación de riesgos por escenarios de variabilidad y cambio climático, como vendavales, incendios forestales, inundaciones urbanas, avenidas torrenciales, el manejo de procesos erosivos en zonas de ladera, entre otros.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto representa posibles adaptaciones para la gestión integral del agua ante escenarios de variabilidad y cambio climático?Este criterio prioriza medidas y proyectos que involucran procesos de gestión del agua a escala de cuenca hidrográfica; desde aspectos ecológicos y culturales relacionados con la oferta-demanda y calidad del recurso, como la protección y recuperación de fuentes abastecedoras, el ahorro y uso eficiente del agua y la salud ambiental.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto busca la conservación de ecosistemas estratégicos para la adaptación al cambio y la variabilidad climática?Este criterio busca entregar una mayor prioridad a las medidas y proyectos relacionados con la conectividad ecosistémica, la gestión ambiental en áreas naturales protegidas y la conservación y regulación de fuentesMunicipio de Dagua -Valle del Cauca Figura 28. Modelo jerárquico para la toma de decisiones con el AHP.Fuente: Elaboración propia con base en CVC (2014).Medidas con mayor impacto potencial en el proceso de adaptación Proyectos con mayor impacto potencial en el proceso de adaptación hídricas y de los bosques del departamento. Involucra además proyectos que contemplan procesos de conservación en el marco de esquemas de pago por servicios ambientales y/o exenciones tributarias por conservación de áreas ambientales estratégicas.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto plantea la incorporación de prácticas y procesos sostenibles en los sistemas productivos como respuesta al cambio y la variabilidad climática?Este criterio entrega una mayor prioridad a las medidas o proyectos que incorporan prácticas de manejo ecológicas en los sistemas productivos del municipio con el fin de hacerlos más resilientes y/o adaptativos ante el cambio y la variabilidad climática.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto proporciona escenarios para la investigación, formación de capacidades y/o apropiación de conocimientos en torno a la gestión y adaptación ante el cambio climático?Este criterio entrega una mayor prioridad a las medidas o proyectos relacionados con procesos de investigación, generación de información, formación de capacidades humanas para la gestión del cambio climático, así como la apropiación social, institucional y sectorial de su conocimiento, la proyección de procesos de educación ambiental enfocados a temas relacionados con el cambio climático y el reconocimiento de las vulnerabilidades e identidades culturales locales.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto implica el desarrollo o transferencia de tecnologías ambientalmente apropiadas para la adaptación al cambio y la variabilidad climática?Por medio de este criterio se otorga mayor prioridad a las medidas o proyectos que plantean procesos de apropiación de tecnologías (tradicionales y de punta) que sirven a posibles adaptaciones al cambio y la variabilidad climática, aplicables en el sector agropecuario, en los sistemas urbanos, o en los sistemas de información para la toma de decisiones, apropiadas en términos de viabilidad socioeconómica, ambiental y cultural.Con el ánimo de determinar las medidas y proyectos idóneos en el proceso de adaptación al cambio climático para el municipio, se compararon los siete criterios descritos anteriormente, usando la media absoluta, sabiendo que esta permite el manejo de un bajo número de alternativas.Posteriormente se realizó este proceso por pares para conocer las preferencias o pesos entre diferentes los criterios y, de esta forma, establecer una jerarquía que permitiera la evaluación en forma independiente de cada una de las medidas y proyectos.En esta etapa del estudio se examinaron los elementos del problema aisladamente por medio de comparaciones por pares. Las evaluaciones o juicios fueron emitidos por los actores claves interesados, que a su vez hicieron parte del desarrollo de los talleres.Para el desarrollo de la valoración de criterios, se empleó una escala ajustada a la planteada por Saaty (1997), donde se establece una serie de medidas que varían en un rango de 1 a 5, relacionadas con juicios verbales de tipo cualitativo, los cuales a su vez establecen un grado de preferencia sobre los elementos comparados.Valor numéricoModeradamente más importante 2Muy poderosamente más importante 4Extremadamente más importante 5Cuadro 13. Escala de valoración de Saaty.Fuente: Esquema propuesto por Morales et al. (2011).El objetivo de este ejercicio consistió en establecer la importancia de cada uno de los criterios que se han definido para la calificación y selección de medidas y proyectos de adaptación al cambio y la variabilidad climática en el municipio de Dagua. Los resultados de este ejercicio constituirán el insumo base para la realización de un análisis de jerarquías por medio de la metodología AHP, lo que permitirá establecer la importancia de los diferentes criterios.Para el desarrollo del ejercicio, los actores claves respondieron las preguntas que se encuentran en las columnas dos y tres del Cuadro 14, con base en la información contenida en cada una de las filas. Para el caso de la pregunta ¿En qué grado considera Ud. que es más importante?, el grado de importancia se calificó con base en la escala de valoración planteada por Saaty, colocando en el espacio del cuadro el valor numérico correspondiente al juicio realizado sobre la importancia.¿En qué grado considera Ud. que es más importante?3. Gestión Integral del Recurso Hídrico 6. Generación de Capacidades para la Gestión y Adaptación ante el Cambio Climático Cuadro 14. Formato utilizado para la calificación de criterios por pares.Fuente: Esquema propuesto por Morales et al. (2011).Municipio de Dagua -Valle del CaucaCuadro 15. Ponderación de pesos asignados para cada criterio.Como resultado de la ponderación, los actores definieron una jerarquía para los criterios, de acuerdo Cuadro 16. Jerarquía final de criterios.con los pesos establecidos en las calificaciones. Esta jerarquía puede apreciarse en el siguiente cuadro.Una vez realizada la comparación y asignación de pesos con base en la preferencia individual de cada actor involucrado, se procedió a la obtención de una preferencia colectiva, a partir de la ponderación de los valores otorgados individualmente. En este proceso se promediaron las valoraciones realizadas por los actores claves.La preferencia resultante constituyó la jerarquía final otorgada para cada criterio en comparación.Posteriormente, esta fue relacionada con un valor numérico que finalmente permitiría la evaluación de las medidas y proyectos, a partir de la sumatoria de los valores relacionados con el cumplimiento o no de cada uno de los criterios.La ponderación efectuada representa la medida absoluta del peso asignado a cada criterio por todos los actores, y puede apreciarse con mayor detalle en el siguiente cuadro. El resultado de este ejercicio plantea como el criterio de mayor importancia para el colectivo de participantes en materia de mitigación y adaptación al cambio y la variabilidad climática, los \"Procesos y sistemas productivos ambientalmente sostenibles\", la \"Conservación de ecosistemas y áreas de interés ambiental\" y la \"Gestión integral del recurso hídrico\". Estos tres criterios configuran el grupo de mayor relevancia para las prioridades del municipio, evidenciando una perspectiva en la que medidas y proyectos con estos alcances podrían representar un mayor impacto en el proceso de adaptación.El segundo grupo de criterios, con pesos que oscilan entre 0.15 y 0.13, está constituido por el \"Desarrollo y transferencia de tecnologías ambientalmente apropiadas para la adaptación al cambio y variabilidad climática\" y la \"Generación de capacidades para la gestión y adaptación ante el cambio climático\". Estos representan criterios que, si bien son relevantes, no son considerados los de mayor importancia.Finalmente, la \"Gestión del riesgo asociado a la variabilidad y cambio climático\" y la \"Soberanía y seguridad alimentaria ante el cambio climático\" recibieron la menor calificación en el proceso de priorización. Este resultado no significa que estos criterios carezcan de relevancia, sino más bien que en estos aspectos desde la percepción de los participantes ya se cuenta con avances significativos, y/o no se percibe una vulnerabilidad considerable.Es importante aclarar que todos los criterios resultan importantes para los procesos de adaptación y mitigación, y que estas jerarquías deben ser interpretadas desde la complementariedad de las temáticas que debe abordar una estrategia, proyecto o medida, de tal forma que involucre más de un criterio y, en mayor medida, aquellos identificados como prioritarios.Consecuentemente, estos pesos y jerarquías serán de utilidad en el momento de evaluar cada proyecto o medida de adaptación y mitigación, en función de los criterios que resultan prioritarios para las particularidades que afronta el municipio, desde la perspectiva de sus habitantes.Contando con este resultado, a continuación se describen las medidas y proyectos identificados, y se presenta su respectiva evaluación desde las prioridades establecidas anteriormente.Municipio de Dagua -Valle del Cauca Cuadro 17. Sistema de cualificación de medidas y proyectos.Fuente: Elaboración propia adaptada de CVC (2014).De acuerdo con la aplicación del sistema de cualificación y priorización de criterios a través de las comparaciones entre ellos, se obtuvo como resultado final el ordenamiento de las medidas y proyectos. Este proceso se desarrolló a partir de la evaluación o calificación bajo un esquema de pregunta clave con única respuesta, donde cada alternativa fue sometida al cumplimiento de cada criterio de evaluación. A continuación se presenta el formato utilizado.Se identificaron un total de 23 proyectos con impacto potencial sobre la adaptación. Estos constituyen las alternativas evaluadas desde los criterios de sostenibilidad aplicados en el marco de la metodología AHP.Para facilitar la comprensión de los resultados obtenidos, se plantea un sistema de cualificación de las medidas y proyectos, basado en los umbrales determinados para cada componente o criterio en el proceso de priorización descrito anteriormente. Estos umbrales determinan un grado de aporte a las prioridades del municipio en términos de adaptación para cada proyecto o medida evaluada, donde se presentan mayores aportes en aquellos proyectos que responden de manera integral a más de un componente o criterio priorizado. El Cuadro16 presenta el sistema de cualificación utilizado en el proceso de priorización de medidas y proyectos.Valoración (grado de aporte a las prioridades de adaptación)Hasta el 25%Proyectos identificados que por sus características son importantes para el municipio, pero constituyen respuestas puntuales a temáticas o criterios concretos de adaptación; no obstante podrían ser desarrollados si las condiciones de gobernabilidád son favorables / Proyectos que pueden ser objeto de revisión para ampliar su impacto sobre los componentes prioritarios. Su implementación debe desarrollarse en el largo plazo.Proyectos identificados que, a pesar de su mediano impacto asociado, pueden empezar a implementarse a mediano plazo, toda vez que las condiciones para su desarrollo sean adecuadas.Proyectos identificados que, por sus características y potencial de impacto, deben ser desarrollados de forma inmediata o a corto plazo, representando estrategias integrales que aportan a diferentes componentes de adaptación de importancia para el municipio; no obstante podrían ser abordadas en un horizonte superior, en caso de que sea necesario crear condiciones, para su óptimo desarrollo.Cuadro 18. Formato para la evaluación de medidas, acciones o proyectos en función del grado de aporte a las prioridades de adaptación al cambio climático y la variabilidad climática en el municipio.Fuente: Elaboración propia adaptada de CVC ( 2014). Se presentan entonces los resultados de la priorización de acuerdo con la valoración de impacto en los componentes de adaptación, presentándose según los resultados proyectos de carácter prioritario, necesario y de impacto puntual, como se describe en el siguiente cuadro.Cuadro 19. Clasificación de los proyectos de acuerdo con la valoración de impactos en los componentes para la adaptación al cambio y la variabilidad climática.Responsables Clasificación Como resultado del análisis de los cambios presentidos, anhelados y temidos, el perfil de capacidad interna, el perfil de oportunidades y amenazas del medio, y las ideas estratégica resultantes, se proponen una serie de estrategias que complementan las expectativas de los actores claves participantes y responden a las necesidades locales del municipio en materia de adaptación al cambio y la variabilidad climática.Es importante resaltar la necesidad de planear un proceso de adaptación para el municipio de Dagua, prefiriendo las medidas enfocadas a la prevención de los riesgos y no aquellas que buscan enfrentarlos. Siguiendo este orden de ideas se presentan a continuación las iniciativas de adaptación, organizadas de acuerdo con la importancia establecida en la priorización de criterios para la adaptación al cambio y la variabilidad climática.Se presenta entonces una ficha por cada iniciativa establecida, las cuales están conformadas por una descripción de objetivos y metodología para su desarrollo, y un mapa con la espacialización de los proyectos más relevantes. Estas iniciativas constituyen una propuesta complementaria desde la prospectiva territorial desarrollada, que refleja en sus plazos los resultados del ejercicio de priorización, constituyendo un insumo desde lo local, para la futura articulación de todos estos en el marco de los contenidos programáticos Figura 30. Proyectos identificados en el marco de la adaptación para el municipio de Dagua. que conformarán los planes de adaptación al cambio climático a escala regional.Municipio de Dagua -Valle del Cauca Componente Estratégico: Conservación de Ecosistemas y Áreas de Interés AmbientalEstablecer acciones de manejo, protección y conservación en zonas aledañas a los ríos afectadas por actividades antropogénicasPreservar la diversidad biológica existente en este ecosistema, de tal forma que las actividades desarrolladas en el municipio no la afectenCon el ánimo de determinar las acciones a desarrollar en las áreas más deterioradas a causa de las actividades antropogénicas, se describe a continuación una zonificación ambiental que puede determinar su uso y manejo.Las unidades de zonificación se pueden describir así:Zonas prioritarias de conservación: Son las áreas en las que existen ecosistemas o zonas que han permanecido inalteradas y rodeadas de áreas con agroecosistemas o tierras modificadas.Zonas de protección forestal: Son las que deben conservar su cobertura boscosa natural, con el fin de proteger los recursos naturales y brindar otros servicios ambientales.Zonas de protección hídrica: Son aquellas donde se identifican los nacimientos de los ríos principales y secundarios, especialmente los nodos que dan origen a las corrientes de agua.Zonas de restauración: Son áreas que presentan un grado de deterioro ambiental, pero que propician o admiten la continuidad de los procesos naturales.Zonas a sustraer de la reserva: Son áreas con obras de infraestructura que han sido construidas al interior de la Reserva Forestal del Pacífico y el Enclave Subxerofítico y que hacen parte del desarrollo de la región o tienen alguna importancia local o regional (Henao et al., 2008). Componente Estratégico: Conservación de Ecosistemas y Áreas de Interés Ambiental Programa Fortalecimiento a la consolidación de áreas de reserva natural de la sociedad civilDefinir las reservas naturales de la sociedad civil como una iniciativa de conservación de la biodiversidad y los recursos naturales en predios de propiedad privadaEl apoyo y promoción del establecimiento de áreas de reserva natural de la sociedad civil se enmarca en el ámbito de contribuir y consolidar con las iniciativas de la sociedad civil en su aporte a la conservación de los recursos naturales, en la búsqueda del desarrollo sostenible.Para el desarrollo del proceso de registro es necesario describir detalladamente los servicios ambientales y sociales que cada predio ofrece; algunas de las características que debe contener son: localización del predio, zonificación de los tipos de uso y hectáreas (conservación, agrosistemas, amortiguación y manejo especial e infraestructura); lo anterior descrito en un mapa. De igual forma se deben detallar los instrumentos de planificación de la reserva y los objetivos de manejo (PNNC, 2005). Conocer la distribución espacial de los servicios ecosistémicos para diseñar estrategias que garanticen el buen uso y la preservación de estos, en beneficio a los distintos sectores de la poblaciónEl concepto de Servicios Ecosistémicos permite entender de qué manera las poblaciones humanas dependen de la biodiversidad. Su cuantificación y valoración permite informar de manera apropiada a los tomadores de decisiones, y permite que los desarrolladores de políticas tengan en cuenta los costos y beneficios relacionados de intervenir en los recursos naturales.En este sentido, un inventario de servicios ecosistémicos permite conocer y establecer las relaciones entre biodiversidad, servicios ambientales y las reservas de carbono que estos poseen.De igual forma sirven como herramienta para el análisis de investigadores, y de comunicación para los planificadores y el público en general sobre dónde se encuentran las áreas con mayor prioridad de conservación (Álvarez, sf).Componente Estratégico: Procesos y Sistemas Productivos Ambientalmente Sostenibles Programa Implementación de sistemas agroforestalesIncrementar la productividad en un sistema diversificado, establecer un sistema resiliente y promover el aprovechamiento sustentable de productos agrícolas y forestalesEste sistema compone una serie de técnicas que aprovechan los multiestratos de un ecosistema.Son idóneos para sitios con vocación agrícola o forestal en estado degradado para recuperar zonas boscosas, sin sacrificar la producción. Su desarrollo se compone de los siguientes pasos:1. Diseñar el sistema con apoyo de un técnico y de acuerdo con las características particulares del sitio (suelo, clima, topografía, cultivos y especies potenciales, acceso a mercados).2. Seleccionar las especies a incluir en el sistema (arbóreas maderables y comestibles; arbustivas y rastreras comestibles y medicinales; herbáceas comestibles para abonos verdes y control de plagas).3. Limpiar y trazar tomando en cuenta curvas de nivel y elementos topográficos distintivos.4. Obtener especies leñosas en viveros, y trasplantar.5. Sembrar en los estratos establecidos en el diseño.6. Dar mantenimiento general según el plan de manejo (PNUMA y Frankfurt School, 2013).Municipal, UMATAComponente Estratégico: Procesos y Sistemas Productivos Ambientalmente Sostenibles Programa Implementar sistemas agrosilvopastoriles en zonas degradadas por ganadería extensivaDesarrollar un sistema de producción diversificado con un enfoque de conservación e iniciar con este un proceso de restauración del suelo y revegetación forestalEl sistema agrosilvopastoril agrupa un conjunto de técnicas para asociar especies arbóreas con ganadería y cultivos en el mismo terreno, con el fin de lograr interacciones ecológicas y económicas significativas.En este sentido, la metodología de implementación es la siguiente:1. Identificar las características físicas del terreno (topografía, suelos, drenaje) que ayuden a determinar la selección, manejo y productividad potencial de los elementos del sistema.2. Realizar un plan de manejo que establezca las áreas destinadas a ganadería, producción agrícola y vegetación arbórea, con base en la capacidad de carga del sitio y el consumo de forraje requerido.3. Seleccionar las especies leñosas, arbustivas, rastreras y herbáceas a sembrar, incluyendo pastos para ganado y cultivos anuales.4. Limpiar, trazar, sembrar y trasplantar los estratos de acuerdo con el plan establecido y cuidando de proteger las áreas productivas de los animales.5. Dar mantenimiento general según el plan de manejo (PNUMA y Frankfurt School, 2013).Municipio de Dagua -Valle del CaucaDifusión e instauración de la política nacional para la gestión de los residuos sólidosFacilitar la aplicación, el desarrollo y posterior seguimiento de los lineamientos de la política, con el fin de iniciar procesos de cambio cultural, técnicos y económicosLa política nacional para la gestión de los residuos sólidos se fundamenta principalmente en la constitución política, las leyes 99 de 1993 y 142 de 1994 y el documento CONPES 2750.La política está orientada a proporcionar a las autoridades ambientales municipales los instrumentos para el apoyo en la gestión y manejo integral de los residuos sólidos.Algunas estrategias mediante las cuales se pueden cumplir los objetivos establecidos en la Política Nacional para la Gestión de Residuos Sólidos se presentan a continuación: Educación y participación ciudadana: Se producen importantes reducciones en las cantidades generadas de residuos sólidos y en el manejo adecuado de estos cuando la gente está dispuesta a cambiar por su propia voluntad sus hábitos y estilos de vida para conservar los recursos naturales y reducir las cargas económicas asociadas a la gestión de estos.Consolidar dentro del sistema nacional de información ambiental un subsistema de información de residuos sólidos que sirva de apoyo para la toma de decisiones en las diversas instancias y niveles que conforman el sector.Constituir una instancia enfocada a consolidar el sector de residuos sólidos capaz de liderar el desarrollo del sector, coordinando las acciones de los diferentes organismos e instituciones involucrados.Ciencia y tecnología: Estructurar y consolidar la red de investigación, innovación y transferencia de tecnología en residuos sólidos; y consolidar las unidades de apoyo tecnológico adscritas a la red, en el nivel municipal para apoyo a los avances en el tema en cuestión (Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, 1998).Componente Estratégico: Procesos y Sistemas Productivos Ambientalmente Sostenibles Programa Implementación de sistemas agrícolas ecológicos (agricultura de conservación)Aumentar la resiliencia de las zonas agrícolas productivas a condiciones cambiantes en el mercado y clima, diversificando e incrementando las sinergias entre los componentes del sistema, minimizando o eliminando la dependencia de insumos químicosÁmbito Responsables Plazo Rural Urbano• Determinar las prácticas adecuadas en las zonas de interés de acuerdo con las condiciones físicas, vocación productiva, recursos locales y conocimiento tradicional presentes en el sitio.• Implementar las prácticas considerando la interacción de las mismas para establecer sinergias en el agroecosistema.• Monitorear la presencia de indicadores biológicos benéficos y antagónicos para promover las interacciones deseadas.X UMATA, Alcaldía Municipal, Asociación de productoresImplementación del plan de gestión integral de residuos sólidosDar a conocer los criterios a tener en cuenta en la gestión integrada de residuos sólidos en el municipio y así mejorar la calidad de vida de la población y las condiciones ambientales del municipioEl plan de gestión integral de residuos sólidos debe actualizarse para así optimizar esta herramienta de planeación, evitar y disminuir los riesgos de salubridad y deterioro del medio ambiente.Esto se puede llevar a cabo por medio del fortalecimiento institucional, promocionando la separación en la fuente en viviendas e industrias, y el ajuste teniendo en cuenta los planes y programas de orden regional y nacional. Todo esto, en aras de que desde la academia se pueda generar el fundamento científico y técnico para la formulación de políticas y acciones que ayuden a la mitigación y adaptación frente a los cambios esperados.En este sentido se resalta una herramienta metodológica que sirve para transversalizar el cambio climático en la planificación: la Adaptación basada en ecosistemas EbA, que asocia la conservación de la biodiversidad como una forma de abordar el cambio climático, proporcionando al mismo tiempo beneficios de bienestar social y conservación de los servicios ambientales que prestan los ecosistemas (Vejarano, 2013) Participar en el seguimiento del proceso de elaboración de la Estrategia Local de Cambio Climático, colaborar en la recogida de información y su análisis, hacer propuestas concretas de mejora y debatir soluciones a partir de la recogida de información, plantear actividades de divulgación, y cooperar en el proceso de seguimiento de aplicación de la citada Estrategia (Futurelx, 2009) Coordinación interinstitucional para la gestión eficiente: Esta línea fomenta los procesos de articulación y coordinación entre las entidades relacionadas con el sector minero, en aspectos técnicos, ambientales, económicos y sociales, asociados a la actividad minera, buscando mecanismos, esquemas y herramientas que permitirán la formalización y control de la actividad minera en Colombia.Formación para el trabajo minero: Esta línea hace énfasis en formar capacidades de capital humano para el desarrollo de la actividad minera, pero sobre todo en adelantar un proceso de acompañamiento continuo a los mineros en procesos productivos y empresariales.Inclusión diferencial y desarrollo social: Esta línea se enfoca en definir herramientas, estrategias y acciones que permitan trasladar los beneficios de la minería a la población.Información para la formalización: Esta línea se enfoca en generar herramientas, instrumentos y sistemas que brinden información confiable, oportuna, pertinente y actualizada del sector minero y de las variables existentes en torno a la formalización de la minería en Colombia.Fortalecimiento técnico, asociativo y empresarial: Esta línea apunta a promover la innovación y el desarrollo tecnológico de la actividad minera, con el propósito de lograr mayores niveles de productividad y competitividad.Recursos e incentivos para la formalización: Esta línea se enfoca en establecer programas de apoyo económico al minero informal, de pequeña y mediana escala, y facilitar su acceso al crédito, mediante la asignación de recursos financieros.Minería bajo el amparo de un título: Genera condiciones para que el desarrollo de las actividades mineras se realicen en el marco de la legalidad.Normatividad y lineamientos para la formalización minera: Esta línea se enfoca en definir los instrumentos normativos y legales necesarios para la formalización de la actividad minera en Colombia (MinMinas, 2014 Este sistema de tratamiento debe contar con los siguientes componentes: Cámara de rejas: Ubicada antes del dispositivo de ingreso, impide el paso de elementos gruesos o de dimensiones considerables presentes en las aguas residuales. Dispositivo de ingreso: La tubería PVC del emisor ingresa al tanque mediante una Tee, alargada en la parte inferior, permitiendo verter los desagües debajo del nivel de agua del tanque séptico.Tanque séptico: Es una estructura de concreto armado de forma rectangular, con dimensiones determinadas en función de los caudales producidos en el sistema de alcantarillado. Pueden ser de una o dos cámaras.Dispositivo salida: está compuesta por una Tee de PVC, en un nivel más bajo que el dispositivo de ingreso. Permite la conducción de la fracción líquida hacia pozos de infiltración o campos de percolación.Lecho de secado: Son pequeñas pozas a donde es trasladado el lodo acumulado en el fondo del tanque séptico luego de un período predeterminado para que se deshidraten por drenaje y evaporación.Cabe resaltar que son sistemas de menor costo en comparación al alcantarillado tradicional (OPS y COSUDE, 2005 Todo esto en aras de que desde la academia se pueda generar el fundamento científico y técnico para la formulación de políticas y acciones que ayuden a la mitigación y adaptación frente a los cambios esperados.En este sentido se resalta una herramienta metodológica que sirve para transversalizar el cambio climático en la planificación: la Adaptación basada en ecosistemas EbA, que asocia la conservación de la biodiversidad como una forma de abordar el cambio climático, proporcionando al mismo tiempo beneficios de bienestar social y conservación de los servicios ambientales que prestan los ecosistemas (Vejarano, 2013) La formulación e implementación de los planes de ordenación y manejo de cuencas hidrográficas requieren de seis fases:Aprestamiento: Se definen el plan de trabajo, la identificación, caracterización y priorización de actores, la estrategia de participación, la revisión y consolidación de información existente, el análisis de la situación inicial y el plan operativo.Diagnóstico: Se consolida el Consejo de Cuenca y se determinará el estado actual de la cuenca en sus componentes: físico-biótico, socioeconómico y cultural, político administrativo, funcional y de gestión del riesgo.Prospectiva y zonificación ambiental: Se diseñan los escenarios futuros del uso coordinado y sostenible del suelo, de las aguas, de la flora y de la fauna presente de la cuenca, y se define, en un horizonte no menor a 10 años, el modelo de ordenación de la cuenca.Formulación: Se define el componente programático, las medidas para la administración de los recursos naturales renovables y el componente de gestión del riesgo.Ejecución y seguimiento: Se establecen las acciones de coordinación que deben adelantar las Corporaciones Autónomas Regionales y de Desarrollo Sostenible competentes para la ejecución del plan de ordenación y manejo de la cuenca hidrográfica.Evaluación: Se aplican los mecanismos definidos en el respectivo plan de seguimiento y evaluación definido en la fase de formulación (MADS, 2014). La reforestación se presenta como una alternativa para conservar y mantener los cursos de agua, mejorar el paisaje y controlar la erosión de los suelos.Los planes de reforestación deben estar articulados a la situación específica de la zona; es por ello que se debe realizar un estudio del bosque natural y del suelo para identificar las especies de flora nativa y así realizar un acondicionamiento de estas.Posteriormente se adecúa la zona para la plantación de las especies, se realiza una demarcación de los lugares donde estos van a ser ubicados, se excavan los hoyos y se trasplantan las plántulas, dejando el suelo firme.Es necesario tener en cuenta el mantenimiento que demanda dicha plantación durante los 2 o 3 primeros años (fertilizaciones, podas, entre otros) y los costos asociados a esto para ser incluidos en el inicio del plan de reforestación (Miranda y Torres, 2010 El tratamiento de las aguas residuales se convierte en un factor muy importante a la hora de establecer el desarrollo social y económico en una comunidad, ya que permite tener una mejor calidad de vida.Es por eso que para el municipio de Dagua se propone un estudio de viabilidad, no solo financiera, sino también social, productiva y ambiental.Según el Centro Panamericano de Ingeniería Sanitaria y Ciencias del Ambiente, en el texto denominado Guía para la Formulación de Proyectos de Sistemas Integrados de Tratamiento y Uso de Aguas Residuales Domésticas en 2002, esta iniciativa debe considerar aspectos como:1. Conceptualización del sistema que se desea implementar.2. Ubicación del estudio en el contexto del municipio.3. Identificación del contexto social del área de estudio.4. Identificación del contexto legal.5. Diagnóstico ambiental.6. Identificación de actores involucrados.7. Evaluación de los suelos y el agua del municipio.8. Definición de la propuesta de un sistema integrado. 9. Socialización de la propuesta con actores involucrados. La estrategia para la respuesta a emergencias es el marco de actuación de las entidades del Sistema Nacional de Gestión del Riesgo para la reacción y atención de emergencias.Se refiere a todos los aspectos que deben activarse por las entidades en forma individual y colectiva, con el propósito de ejecutar la respuesta a emergencias de manera oportuna y efectiva. Dentro de las acciones de coordinación establecidas en la estrategia de respuesta a emergencias se deben definir los siguientes aspectos: Objetivos, servicios, actores, participación de los actores, niveles de emergencia, estructura de actuación, y procedimientos operativos.Dicha estrategia y sus actualizaciones deben ser adoptadas mediante decreto expedido por el gobernador o alcalde (Vargas, sf) En este sentido, el IPCC plantea un esquema metodológico basado en el cálculo de emisiones a partir de datos de actividad y factores de emisión para cada país. Este proceso metodológico abarca las siguientes etapas:Identificación del propósito del inventario. Selección de la técnica de medición. Establece el método de cuantificación de las emisiones de GEI y contaminantes criterio a partir del nivel de profundización seleccionado.Identificación de fuentes de emisión. Mediante información suministrada por diferentes entidades públicas y privadas, tales como cámara de comercio, autoridades ambientales, empresas de transporte y bases de datos electrónicas.Recopilación de datos de actividad. Se realizará en función de las fuentes de emisión identificadas.Selección de factores de emisión. Se seleccionan teniendo en cuenta: i) datos de actividad de las fuentes de emisión que apliquen para el municipio, y ii) recomendaciones de la metodología IPCC.Cálculo de emisiones y reporte final. Teniendo en cuenta las etapas anteriores, se determinan las emisiones de GEI y contaminantes criterio para finalmente consolidar la información en un reporte final (IPCC, 2006) La fiscalización de la conservación de los recursos naturales no solo es tarea de la autoridad ambiental legalmente definida (CVC), sino que también debe incorporar la participación de toda la comunidad y todo los actores que están involucrados en la misma, lo cual permite que la formulación de políticas municipales que controlen y penalicen el uso inadecuado de recursos naturales sea un proceso concertado y participativo. En ese sentido se debe propender por establecer lineamientos claros de política ambiental en el municipio que busquen conservar los recursos naturales. Este proceso debe contener al menos estas etapas:1. Establecimiento del equipo de trabajo.2. Diagnóstico del estado ambiental del municipio, ecosistemas, coberturas, conflicto de uso del suelo, zonas de deforestación, entre otras.3. Definición de acciones de protección y control.4. Ejecución de acciones de protección y control.5. Seguimiento y evaluación del control y la fiscalización ambiental. Municipio de Dagua -Valle del Cauca Instrucción 1. Nombre del proyecto/acción. 2. Objeto del proyecto/acción. 3. Criterio. 4. Nombre de la institución y de la persona directamente responsable del proyecto/acción. 5. Datos de contacto de la persona responsable (email y teléfono). 6. Estado del proyecto: En formulación (EF), Formulado y sin recursos (FSR), Formulado y con recursos (FCR), En ejecución (E) 7. Fecha en que fue/será desarrollado el proyecto. Escriba el número del criterio: 1. Soberanía y seguridad alimentaria ante el cambio climático 2. Gestión del riesgo asociado a la variabilidad y cambio climático 3. Gestión integral del recurso hídrico 4. Conservación de ecosistemas y áreas de interés ambiental 5. Procesos y sistemas Productivos ambientalmente sostenibles 6. Generación de capacidades para la gestión y adaptación ante el cambio climático 7. Desarrollo y transferencia de tecnologías ambientalmente apropiadas para la adaptación al cambio y variabilidad climática. Formato de valoración de criterios para la selección de medidas y proyectos de adaptación al cambio y variabilidad climática en el municipio de Dagua, de acuerdo con la metodología de Análisis Jerárquico (AHP)El objetivo del siguiente ejercicio consiste en establecer la importancia de cada uno de los criterios que se han definido para la calificación y selección de medidas y proyectos de adaptación al cambio y variabilidad climática en el municipio de Dagua. Los resultados de este ejercicio constituirán el insumo base para la realización de un análisis de jerarquías por medio de la metodología AHP, lo que permitirá establecer la importancia de los diferentes criterios.Para el desarrollo del ejercicio, se procederá a responder las preguntas que se encuentran en la segunda y tercera columna del Cuadro A2, con base en la información contenida en cada una de las filas. Para el caso de la pregunta ¿En qué grado considera usted que es más importante? (Tercera columna en el Cuadro A2), el grado de importancia se calificará con base en el Cuadro A1, colocando en el espacio respectivo del cuadro, el valor numérico que corresponda al juicio que se realice sobre la importancia. La escala definida para esta valoración (de 1 a 5) ha sido diseñada con base en la metodología de Análisis Jerárquico AHP. Ejemplo de aplicación:En el anterior ejemplo, la valoración efectuada asignó una preferencia al criterio número 6, por encima del criterio número 3; y el grado o valoración de la importancia que se otorgó es de 4, conforme a la escala planteada en el Cuadro A1.A continuación se presenta el formato vacío (Cuadro A2) donde podrá usted efectuar las calificaciones. Recuerde consultar, al final del presente documento, la explicación de cada criterio si tiene alguna duda en el proceso de comparación y calificación. Por favor evite realizar comparaciones cuyo valor de preferencia sea 1 (igualmente importante); reserve dicha opción para casos extremos en que no le sea posible tener una preferencia. Por medio de este criterio, se busca priorizar proyectos y medidas relacionadas con la adaptación ecológica y cultural de los agroecosistemas a la variabilidad y el cambio climático, el reconocimiento y recuperación de saberes y prácticas productivas ancestrales que garanticen la soberanía y seguridad alimentaria ante el cambio climático.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto contempla adaptaciones, manejo o mitigación de riesgos relacionados con variabilidad y cambio climático?A través de este criterio, se busca priorizar aquellas medidas y proyectos que involucran posibles adaptaciones desde la gestión del riesgo ante el cambio climático, involucrando obras de manejo y mitigación de riesgos por escenarios de variabilidad y cambio climático, como vendavales, incendios forestales, inundaciones urbanas, avenidas torrenciales, el manejo de procesos erosivos en zonas de ladera, entre otros.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto representa posibles adaptaciones para la gestión integral del agua ante escenarios de variabilidad y cambio climático?Este criterio prioriza medidas y proyectos que involucran procesos de gestión del agua a escala de cuenca hidrográfica; desde aspectos ecológicos y culturales relacionados con la oferta -demanda y calidad del recurso, como la protección y recuperación de fuentes abastecedoras, el ahorro y uso eficiente del agua y la salud ambiental.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto busca la conservación de ecosistemas estratégicos para la adaptación al cambio y la variabilidad climática?Este criterio busca otorgar una mayor prioridad a las medidas y proyectos relacionados con la conectividad ecosistémica, la gestión ambiental en áreas naturales protegidas y la conservación y regulación de fuentes hídricas y de los bosques del departamento. Involucra además proyectos que contemplan procesos de conservación en el marco de esquemas de pago por servicios ambientales y/o exenciones tributarias por conservación de áreas ambientales estratégicas.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto plantea la incorporación de prácticas y procesos sostenibles en los sistemas productivos como respuesta al cambio y la variabilidad climática?Este criterio brinda una mayor prioridad a las medidas o proyectos que incorporan prácticas de manejo ecológicas en los sistemas productivos del municipio con el fin de hacerlos más resilientes y/o adaptativos ante el cambio y variabilidad climática.Pregunta clave: ¿La medida o proyecto proporciona escenarios para la investigación, formación de capacidades y/o apropiación de conocimientos en torno a la gestión y adaptación ante el cambio climático?Este criterio entrega una mayor prioridad a medidas o proyectos relacionados con procesos de investigación, generación de información, formación de capacidades humanas para la gestión del cambio climático, así como la apropiación social, institucional y sectorial de su conocimiento, la proyección de procesos de educación ambiental enfocados en temas relacionados con el cambio climático y el reconocimiento de las vulnerabilidades e identidades culturales locales.Por medio de este criterio, se otorga mayor prioridad a las medidas o proyectos que plantean procesos de apropiación de tecnologías (tradicionales y de punta) que sirven a posibles adaptaciones al cambio y variabilidad climática, aplicables en el sector agropecuario, en los sistemas urbanos o en los sistemas de información para la toma de decisiones, apropiadas en términos de viabilidad socioeconómica, ambiental y cultural."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2683666939.json b/main/part_2/2683666939.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e54029450ba13ecc97edc90e68fc9c496e00591 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2683666939.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"73e7befd7494c3b0fd43b31f74facad2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/c65b3ad1-9630-4c86-8de4-30360ce17c89/content","id":"-1103346624"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"cba643b3-a25b-40c4-b887-4645226812ea","content":"Among smallholder maize farmers in Ethiopia (and similar areas in Africa), yield and stress tolerance traits in maize varieties are important. While high yields remain a major objective, breeding and seed system development programs are increasingly based on the recognition that farmers also have an interest in other agronomic and consumption traits. In this paper we illustrate these issues by measuring the trade-offs farmers may be willing to make for specific traits in the mid-altitude maize markets in Ethiopia. Based on Choice Experiments among 1499 respondents, we estimate the preference for a set of agronomic and consumption traits relative to yield. by capturing farmers' \"willingness to sacrifice yield\". The results suggest a significant willingness to sacrifice yield for drought tolerance among both male and female household members, but not for early maturity per se. There was also a high willingness to sacrifice yields for plant architecture traits like closed tip and lodging resistance among male participants, but not among females. Heterogeneity in responses according to gender, education and land area under maize cultivation suggests that market segmentation is necessary for seed system development to become more demand-led and inclusive. Final and realistic segmentation will depend on the commercial viability or social impact potential of each segment.Like much of eastern and southern Africa, maize has acquired a prominent role in Ethiopian diets and in terms of total national annual production it outstrips that of teff, sorghum and wheat by more than 50% each [1]. Maize provides a cheaper calorie source compared to the other cereals and now makes up the largest share in calorie intake and production in the country [2][3][4]. The high yields of maize compared to the other cereals is a general pattern seen around the world and it is partly due to the investment by public and private actors in maize breeding. The maize breeding system in Ethiopia goes back more than five decades, with increased investment in the last two decades [2,5]. The growing importance of maize in Ethiopia's agriculture has, however, been based on just a few market-dominant varieties.The review by [6] shows that Ethiopia's maize breeding program started in early 1950s (about 70 years ago). The national breeding system is currently organized around four major agroecological zones. These include mid-altitude sub-humid, highland subhumid, low-land subhumid and low moisture agroecologies [6]. These agroecologies are characterized by differences in altitude, annual rainfall, temperature, relative humidity and latitude. The emphasis on these decades long program has been to provide a wide range of locally adapted open pollinated varieties (OPVs) especially in the early years and later hybrids have become common. In recent years, emphasis has been placed on tolerance to abiotic stresses such as tolerance to foliar diseases such as grey leaf spot, leaf blight, common leaf rust, striga weed (Striga hermonthica) and the like. Since the 2000s, breeding programs for nutritional quality have also been implemented with efforts made to breed for grains with high protein, provitamin-A as well as good livestock feed attributes. The implementation of participatory variety selection methods (where farmers comparatively score pre-released varieties for various attributes) have been implemented to ensure new released maize varieties meet end user preferences. The geographically dispersed breeding programs have generated varieties in different maturity classes such as extra early OPVs for drought escape which mature at 90 days for the drought prone areas. Intermediate maturing varieties are targeted at the cooler mid-to high altitudes. In terms of appealing to different types of farmers with varying economic capacity to purchase inputs, the breeding programs have taken the combined approach of developing varieties that respond to high input levels but also are tolerant to low fertilizer application among most resource-poor farmers.Between 2002-2010, over 90% of total maize seed sales were accounted for by three varieties produced mainly by the Ethiopian Seed Enterprise (ESE). One of these leading varieties was BH660, which was reported to have approximately 50% market share of hybrid seed sales in Ethiopia (Worku et al. 2012). In recent years more varieties with emphasis on drought tolerance (and tolerance to foliar diseases) have also been developed and are now gaining market share. By 2014, a total of 61 different maize varieties were developed over the years [2]. The authors in [2] counted a total of 20 different commercial varieties (hybrids and composites) as of 2013, BH660 had 51% market share. Recent government of Ethiopia reports indicate that more than 68 different maize varieties released in Ethiopia in more recent years [7]. Therefore, it is apparent the country is on a path towards creating a pipeline of new generation hybrids suitable for high, mid, and low altitude zones. This is an indication of progress in Ethiopian seed systems to provide a more diverse varietal portfolio. A better evidence base about farmers' trait preferences is a key dimension for ensuring demand-oriented maize seed system development going forward [8,9]. While yield obviously is an important characteristic for maize varieties, there is also a range of other agronomic and end-use traits that warrants more attention from breeders and other seed sector actors. For a more detailed analysis of Ethiopia's maize breeding programs in the last seventy years, please refer to [6,10].In this paper, we use an innovative approach to measure farmers' varietal attribute preference by estimating their willingness to sacrifice yield (WTSY) (for more on the WTSY concept, see [11]), where WTSY was first estimated for a similar study in western Kenya. Estimating WTSY can indicate the relative trade-offs farmers are willing to make between traits.Previous studies from other smallholder contexts have shown that trait preferences can explain why farmers continue to cultivate different maize varieties. The authors in [12] working within a Malawian context, found that while farmers indeed appreciated hybrids for their yield and drought tolerance traits, they rated local OPVs higher for storability and some consumption traits and the authors suggested this as a potential explanation for the 30-40% adoption plateau for hybrid maize in the country [12]. A series of papers on perceived benefits of different types of maize varieties in Mexico have similarly shown that farmers plant hybrids for yield, they continue to grow landraces as well because they find them superior for other agronomic and processing traits [13][14][15]. Plant breeders have employed different strategies for meeting the diverse demands of farmers, ranging from various forms of collaborative plant breeding to market-based approaches to product profiling [16]. However, as climate, pest-and disease-pressure and farmer preferences constantly change, plant breeding and seed systems must not only deliver a more diverse portfolio of varieties, but also enable a higher varietal turnover than what is currently the case in the region [17,18].Under some circumstances, stress tolerance and yield attributes could outweigh common \"taste attributes\" if the varieties lack preferred grain characteristics but are high yielding and stress tolerant. Hypothetically, new tastes can be acquired, or less preferred tastes can be overcome, if the choice boils down to sacrificing yield and stress tolerance traits. Arguably, farmers' knowledge about the positive attributes of new varieties and on what specific attributes they outperform the existing ones also helps build demand for new varieties. We illustrate these concepts in this paper.The rest of this paper is organised as follows. The next section describes the data collection and empirical methodologies used in the study. The methodologies section has subsections that discuss the sampling and data sources, the choice experiment design, and the underlying choice theory used in this study. The methodology section also describes the traits used in this study and outlines the econometric approaches. The results section presents the descriptive data, the mixed logit model results and finally the WTSY as measured by the choice experiment (CE) and the BDM data. The final section concludes by summarising key results and describes the implications therefrom.The data used for this study came from a random sample of 800 households in the mid-altitude sub-humid maize growing zones of western and central agro-ecozones of Ethiopia (Table 1). The sampling process was done in three stages by combining purposive and random sampling. In the first stage, districts (woredas) that were in the mid-altitude maize growing areas of Ethiopia were selected. These areas coincided with a maize breeding and seed systems development projects (the Stress Tolerant Maize for Africa Project and later the Accelerating Genetic Gains in Maize and Wheat Project co-implemented by CIMMYT and Ethiopian researchers) with the former project having been implemented in these districts between 2015-2020 and the latter project ongoing as at the time of writing.The second stage involved the selection of villages (kebeles) within the project sites. Villages were selected using a sampling design that makes explicit use of the population size, \"the probability proportional to size\" (PPS) in order to sample more villages (and consequently households) from the more populous woredas. In the third stage, a random sampling of households within each village was selected from a village household listing developed by the village leader and the project team. Using a random number generator, 40 households were randomly selected from each village. Based on this procedure, 800 households from two regions Oromia and Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples region (one of the nine federal administrative regions of Ethiopia-the latter being SNNP for short), four zones, eight woredas and 20 kebeles (villages) were selected (Table 1). In each household, both the household-head and the spouse were interviewed. In cases where a spouse was not available, any adult household member that was knowledgeable about farming in the household was interviewed (in addition to the household head).Prior to the experiments, extensive focus group discussions were held with farmers in the survey communities. Key traits identified during the discussions included: yield, drought tolerance, maturity period, lodging resistance, husk (tip cover), resistance to foliar diseases, and taste when boiled or roasted. A summary of key traits identified and their distribution across the four experiments is presented in Table 3. All the traits were used for both CEs and BDM. More information on the BDM and the CE processes are presented in Appendices 1 and 2 in S1 File respectively.A CE was conducted to elicit farmers' preferences for selected yield and non-yield maize traits. While CEs have been applied in diverse fields such as transportation [19], health [20], marketing [21], and environmental economics [22], they have more recently found application in studying agricultural value chains such as consumer attitudes and preferences for nutrientdense staples [23], farmers valuation of agronomic traits [24], and credence attributes [25]. Other examples are preferences for alternative marketing channels and supply chain differentiation [26,27], and farmers' valuation of alternative input policy proposals [28].The CE techniques are stated experiments where individuals are asked to choose their preferred alternatives from sets of abstract product profiles ('choice sets'). The concept is motivated by Lancaster's consumer choice theory: consumers derive utility from the underlying characteristics or attributes of a service or product [29] based on the random utility theory (RUT). In RUT, rational consumers prefer an alternative that yields the highest subjective utility among a given set of alternatives [30][31][32]. Some of the factors that drive utility can be observed by the analyst. These observed factors form part of the deterministic (systematic) part of the utility function. Other factors are not observable (e.g., unobserved alternative attributes; individual characteristics, also called 'unobserved taste variations) and others are due to measurement or specification errors [33,34]. The basic theory is that utility is not directly observable, but can be deduced from farmers' choices (here, 'stated preferences').Following this framework, we proceeded as follows. Farmers were presented with two hypothetical maize varieties exhibiting varying trait combinations. For the n th farmer faced with J = 2 varieties, the utility of variety j is U nj . By choosing variety j, the implication is that U nj is the maximum among the J utilities. As we explain below the estimation of the preference weights is based on a statistical model driven by the probability that variety j is chosen is;The data collection was done using a structured questionnaire that had one section dedicated to the CE and additional sections with survey questions that captured demographic and farm information. The CE elicited maize trait preferences from participants in ways that required them to give up some levels of one trait in favor of another trait, thereby improving on other stated preference approaches by compelling participants to make trade-offs. To generate the CE sessions, we used the D-efficient statistical design. The traits and trait levels used for the CEs are described in Table 3 below.Each household was randomly assigned to one of the four experiments using an excel number generator, (resulting in 200 households in each experiment). Table 2 shows the distribution of respondents interviewed for each experiment. In each household, efforts were made to elicit the choices from both the household head and the spouse. However, the actual interviews were conducted separately with the household head and the spouse (or another adult household member who independently operated a maize plot). In cases where there was only one single adult in the household (with only minor children as the other members) or where only one adult operated a maize plot, then only that one member (typically the household head) was interviewed. From this process, a total of 1499 respondents participated in the four experiments (Table 3).In basic terms, data from CE models tend to be analyzed using multinomial logit (MNL) models. The MNL (and related conditional logit-CL) models have been widely used to analyze discrete choice problems [35][36][37]. The MNL has the individual as a unit of analysis and uses the individual's characteristics as arguments in the estimation model, while CL focusses on the set of alternatives for each individual and the characteristics of those alternatives used as explanatory variables [37] The two models can be specified as follows where X n are the demographics of the choice maker n, Z nj are the characteristics of alternative j for individual n, while β and δ are the corresponding vectors of parameters that represent the influence of individual and attribute characteristics on the choice.To reduce the complexity of the choice experiments, we designed three separate experiments consisting of three traits each (with yield being common to all three experiments). For a subset (approximately 25%) of the experiments, we also conducted a Becker-DeGroote-Merschack (BDM) auction experiment [38]. The BDM element was added as a robustness check against hypothetical bias in the CEs. Using incentive-compatible mechanisms like the Vickrey's random n th price auction, or Becker-DeGroote-Marschack (BDM) framework [38] can reduce such biases [39].Generally, the specification of MNL and CL models require that the unobserved effects are independently and identically distributed (IID) across the alternatives in the choice set, according to the extreme type 1 distribution. This means that the odds ratio between two alternatives does not change by the inclusion or exclusion of any other alternative [40]. For instance, assuming two choice sets, C 1 and C 2 such that C 1 � C n and C 2 � C n , and for any alternatives j and k in both C 1 and C 2 , the odds of choosing alternative j over alternative k should be independent of the choice set for all pairs j, k or by the inclusion or exclusion of any other alternative;The IID assumption results into a more rigid property of 'independence from irrelevant alternatives' (IIA) [34,37]. The IIA property assumes that everybody in the population has a homogeneous preference structure, and therefore restricts the β 0 s to be the same for all members of the population [41]. That is, ε nj for all n, j the probability that a given individual n chooses alternative j within the choice set C n is given by;Therefore, the IIA property is a rather strong assumption to be satisfied by any method when there are only two alternatives, and it will be of minor importance with a few alternatives and a fixed or lightly-varying choice set [42]. The IIA can be remedied somewhat by assuming a multivariate normal distribution (allowing the residuals across alternatives to be correlated with each other) and estimating the model with multinomial probit model [40]. However, this approach has its drawbacks due to difficulties in estimation.The alternative (which we employ in this paper) is to use the mixed logit model (MIXL) (also known as the random parameters model)-currently a more common approach in estimating choice data [19,43,44]. The MIXL obviates the three limitations of the standard logit models by allowing for random taste variations, unrestricted substitution patterns, and correlation in unobserved factors which relaxes the IIA assumption [45,46]. In the MIXL, the utility derived by farmer n from choosing maize variety j on choice occasion t is given by:where β is the vector of mean attribute utility weights in the population and e n is the vector of person n 0 s specific deviation from the mean. The random error term ε njt is still assumed to be independently and identically distributed extreme value. The e n can be specified to take any distribution; normal, log-normal or triangular [36]. Although most applications use the multivariate normal, MVN (0, Ʃ), the price coefficient is sometimes assumed to be log-normal to impose positive sign restriction [47]. In this paper however, we replace the price variable with yield.If (as we here assume) most farmers want to maximize yield, all else equal, we estimate the WTSY, or the yield penalty they are willing to accept in exchange for a desirable trait. However, this is an experimental device, not a policy prescription because in real world situations, yield penalties are not accepted for new varieties, and neither is it in farmers interests for a variety to underperform in yield terms, compared to pre-existing varieties. This is analogous (in our case) to the 'willingness to pay' or the cost (price) variable. In the absence of correlation between variety attributes, the MIXL model therefore takes the following form;where Y is a binary decision variable that takes the value of 1 if farmer n chooses variety j in choice scenario t, and 0 otherwise. The variable Q is the yield attribute-which was used in the place of commonly used price variable, while Z is a vector of other non-yield maize traits.Recall from Table 3, the non-yield attributes were drought tolerance, 90-day maturity, resistance to lodging, husk/tip cover, resistance to rust/pest, and taste. A positive coefficient for γ and δ implies a positive influence of yield and non-yield traits on selection of a particular variety. Estimation of Eq 6 gives the mean of the coefficient, and the standard deviation of the distribution of the coefficient around the mean. Preference heterogeneity is deemed present if the standard deviation is significant. We therefore extend Eq 6 by including interaction terms to better understand the role of socioeconomic factors in influencing farmers' preferences.In Eq 7, x is a vector of socioeconomic characteristics including age and education level of the respondent, and size of land under maize. Estimation of Eqs 6 and 7 follows the simulated maximum likelihood method as described by Hole (2007). It can be expected that in Eq 7 the responses are correlated which could mean that the intra-household responses are not independent. This is a fair assumption given that the respondents are part of the same household.To handle this, we implemented the MIXL in STATA 16. The estimation in this procedure was clustered at household level with robust standard errors. Note that the multiple observations within the household has a \"panel\" structure. In our case, the MIXL is designed to take this into account via and sub-routine \"group_id\" during MIXL implementation. The \"group_id\" was meant to identify the cluster of each respondent through the household identifier (household cluster), respondent type (intra-household respondent heterogeneity) and experiment session number (to capture any correlations between experimental sessions).The estimates obtained from Eqs 6 and 7 can further be used to compute the willingness to pay for the selected attributes. Here, we compute farmers' WTSY for other preferred non-yield traits. We estimate the WTSY in a manner analogous to WTP, by obtaining the partial derivatives of yield (Q) with respect to other attributes (z), and multiplying by -1 [20];The use of yield as the \"price\" for evaluating maize traits is intuitive [11]. Consider the fact that despite the various stress tolerance, grain quality or agronomic traits that a maize variety possesses, maize grain itself is marketed as an undifferentiated product without any price differentials based on many of the field traits [48]. Although official grain quality standards and definitions do exist, these apply to international trade and meant to conform to phytosanitary and health standards in quality-sensitive international markets. In local domestic markets, other than obvious aspects such damaged or rotten grain or foreign matter or debris; there are no price differentials based on grain grades per se (e.g., uniformity, flintiness, size, color etc.) [48]. This means that although there is a drive towards market-driven maize breeding, unless producers are willing to pay more for newer maize varieties and a segmentation of the market is enabled, many seed companies may find only weak incentives to regularly update their maize variety portfolio, given the high R&D and marketing costs involved in the new varieties. This is evident in the frequently-reported slow variety turnover often cited in the region. The seed markets in Ethiopia are similarly un-differentiated. Maize seed is mostly marketed by government-owned seed enterprises operated by federal or state governments. Though there is a seed price difference between varieties supplied by private seed producers (mainly Pioneer/CORTEVA) and the public seed enterprises, in each supplier group, seed prices do not vary based on a variety's attributes and tend to be controlled. Seed price is therefore not an attribute that reflects the value of a specific trait since seed prices tend to vary very little for different varieties. Confirming this, in focus group discussions (FGDs), seed price was not mentioned as an attribute that farmers considered when deciding on their seed purchases. This is understandable given the dominant role state enterprises play in these seed markets, a policy choice driven by need for low-priced seed. For these reasons, price was not included as a cost variable, rather we use yield as the key consideration farmers make when choosing different varieties. For instance, when a farmer chooses an early maturing versus a late maturing variety the calculation boils down to the yield difference as the \"price\" a farmer would be willing to pay for a lower yielding, but early maturing variety compared to a higher yielding late maturing type.The sample was relatively balanced between men and women, being about 50% for each category. The percentage of households who were maize net buyers was 29-31%. The average age of the respondents was 54.8 years. The data shows that the households were largely agrarian with 65% relying mainly on primary agriculture as the main farming occupation. There is some indication that most of the households are far from markets with an average of 11 km to the nearest trading center. The overall picture is that of a middle-aged rural farming population, dependent on agriculture and more than 80% with only primary level (eight years or less) of education (Table 4).In this section we review the CE results from MIXL and BDM models to identify the possible tradeoffs in farmers choice of maize traits in the study areas. To reiterate for emphasis, we use yield as the numeraire for comparing the WTSY for the other six traits (drought tolerance, maturity in three months or less, lodging resistant, closed tip, sweet taste and resistant to foliar diseases). In Experiment A (Table 5), the yield attribute had a statistically significant positive coefficient but half of that of drought tolerance in magnitude. The interaction effect suggests that there was heterogeneity with regards to education and land area under maize. These suggest that larger maize producers emphasized yield more than smaller maize producers. Had the FGDs not revealed the reason behind the issues, it could be seen as surprising that early maturity trait was negatively regarded among male farmers (although not statistically significant).During the FGDs, many farmers correctly associated early maturing varieties with low yields. Moreover, they also explained that \"if you have an early maturing crop, it is difficult to secure the crop from theft as it matures when few others in the village have a crop in the middle of the hunger season [just before the main harvest]. In many cases, when one has early crop, many neighbors and friends come to ask for assistance making it difficult to accumulate any yields\". They therefore preferred the higher yielding longer maturing varieties that are grown by the majority. However, we surmise that where more farmers are able to plant the short maturation variety and where market off-take is strong, these short maturing varieties are planted manly for green maize market during the short season. Given the concerns raised by farmers in these locations, and so long as market off take opportunities exist, it is possible that with better synchronization of maize planting across the villages, short season varieties may be widely planted as a source of income during the minor season (January to May). These opportunities are potentially large for farmers in peri-urban areas [49].In Experiment B, the coefficient on the yield attribute is not significant and is lower than that observed in experiment A. This may suggest a framing effect in which the yield attribute is somewhat diminished if the variety is presented as not lodging resistant or has open tip. A variety that easily lodges may have a nugatory effect on yield such that a high yielding variety, but which is susceptible to lodging is unlikely to be chosen, not because farmers do not want high yields, but because of the risk of high losses during winds and storms. The same reasoning applies to open tip varieties which are vulnerable to ear rots because moisture easily enters the cobs. In experiment C, the relative importance of yield in relation to sweet taste of fresh maize or resistance to foliar diseases can also be seen. The coefficients for sweet taste of fresh maize or resistance to foliar diseases are larger than those for yield. Ethiopia has a large green maize market with a report indicating that by 2014, the green maize business in Addis Ababa (the largest city) was about $18 million at the time of that publication (at the exchange rate of $1 equivalent to Birr 18 in 2014, the Birr being the Ethiopian currency), thereby denoting a considerable and lucrative markets for green maize with desirable end user taste attributes [49]. Therefore, this seems to have an influence on the relative importance of taste variable in farmers mental calculations in our experiments.Table 6 summarizes the willingness to sacrifice yield for the six maize attributes disaggregated by sex of the experiment participant. The results suggest that early maturity was less important for both male and female farmers and had lowest WTSY. The early maturity trait was disliked by male participants as measured by WTSY (-0.17) and 0.15 (female farmers). In both cases, the underlying coefficient was statistically zero. Closed tip was valued most among male farmers (with a WTSY of 14.96) which was about twice male respondents' WTSY for lodging resistance (WTSY of 7.2). The WTSY for resistance foliar diseases was about twice the WTSY for sweet taste among female respondents. Among men, the WTSY for resistance to foliar disease was statistically zero and the WTSY for sweet taste was 4.4.Comparing WTSY in experiment A and B, we see that among male farmers, lodging resistance was valued twice as much as drought tolerance. The WTSY for sweet taste among female respondents (3.5) was almost equal to the WTSY for drought tolerance (3.1) when comparing the WTSY in Experiment A and C. A similar comparison of experiment A and C shows that male farmers valued sweet taste (WTSY of 4.36) slightly more than drought tolerance (WTSY of 3.26). These results suggest that when drought tolerance becomes standard in many varieties, better tasting varieties will have a competitive edge, because farmers (at least in Ethiopia) seem to care about sweet taste. This is understandable as the green market is reasonably large in Ethiopia [49]. Typically, buyers appraise whether the variety is the \"sweet type\" by certain visible ear coloration to identify the sweet varieties.In the aggregate, for male and female respondents, the WTSY estimates were similar in magnitude. Differences were generally small (even when they are statistically significant). This suggests that in many cases, women farmers want the same traits in maize varieties as their male counterparts. Similar results have been found by [11] in western Kenya. An important distinction is that in the Kenyan study all the respondents were participating in the study as farmers. In that role, women approach the evaluation of maize varieties in the same way as men (high yields, drought and disease tolerance and resistance to pre-harvest losses such as standability and closed tip). In their role as custodians of household food provisioning, gender differences in grain quality preferences may show more clearly. These multiple roles of women (as farmers, small scale grain retailers and custodians of family nutrition), need to be clearly studied and understood. The results also suggest that the high WTSY for closed tip and lodging resistance may be related to the high probability of losses that occur when a variety is open tip or lodges easily. In both cases, pre-harvest losses can be large. Therefore, compared to losses due to moderate mid-season drought, these occur with near certainty. Another way to interpret the results is that a drought tolerant variety is considered most valuable if it is not susceptible to lodging or rotting. The CE results from MIXL and BDM are similar in magnitude in 15 out of the 18 WTSY cases (Fig 1). This serves to provide some robustness check that the two methods (implemented on different households yielded similar results on average). The average (pooled) BDM estimate for lodging resistance was similar to CE pooled estimate. We conclude that even though the WTSY for lodging resistance, closed tip and resistance to foliar diseases, was two to five times larger in the CE estimates of WTSY., This is also true in the case of WSTY for lodging resistance and closed tip in the male sample and for resistance to foliar diseases for female sample. All the rest of BDM and CE estimates of WTSY were well within the same order of magnitude.In this paper, by applying a mixed logit model to Choice Experiment data from 1499 male and female participants, we estimated smallholder farmers' willingness to sacrifice yield for a set of critical maize traits reflecting yield potential, drought and disease tolerance, days to maturity and taste. The results suggest that in the study areas, both male and female respondents had similar preferences for maize traits. With a WTSY of about 15, closed tip was valued most among male farmers. The WTSY for resistance to foliar diseases was about twice the WTSY for sweet taste among female respondents. Among male respondents, the WTSY for resistance to foliar disease was statistically zero and the WTSY for sweet taste was slightly higher than four. The WTSY for drought tolerance and sweet taste was consistently significant with an average (pooled) WTSY of 3.1 and 3.4 respectively. Overall, the WTSY as estimated by the CE and BDM methods were mostly within similar orders of magnitude. Where there were notable differences, the WTSY for lodging resistance, closed tip and resistance to foliar diseases, was two to five times larger in the CE estimates.Broadly, in view of the reported preference patterns, the existence of multiple varieties ought to be guided by each variety bringing a unique bundle of attributes to the market. This is significant because as the seed sector grows (and becomes more competitive), many varieties will likely achieve yield parity, especially within the same market segment. This is in line with the national variety release policies and regulations in Ethiopia and most of Africa which invariably require the yields of new varieties to be significantly higher than the best commercial checks [50]. With time, as breeding efficiencies improve and breeders maintain the genetic yield gains across varieties, which is considered as a basic (or must have) trait, yield per se may recede as a factor of competition. At that point, market share and competition will be based on other traits such as drought tolerance or consumption traits.A clearer view of the trends that will define future competition and product differentiation in crop improvement programs and seed system development are critical. We extend the literature on farmers' variety choices in a way that captures preference tradeoffs and that reflect farmer priorities in situations where no single variety possesses all the desired traits, as is likely to be the usual case. Such information is useful for actors along the entire maize value chain, from breeding programs to seed companies. They can use this understanding to identify market niches and segments and to adjust to new forces of competition. As part of the recent One CGIAR reform it was highlighted that the breeding programs of the organization should \"ensure that new varieties are designed to meet the requirements and preferences of women and men farmers, consumers, traders, processes and others along the value chain\" [51]. Along the same lines, voices from across the CGIAR and other research organizations are increasingly calling for the seed system development efforts downstream of the breeding programs to become more demand-led and inclusive [52].In maize seed markets, farmers play a double role as consumers and producers. Therefore, they make variety choices based on a mix of consumption and market (commercial) considerations. End user traits (grain size, shape, flour conversion ratio) may, on the surface, appear inconsequential compared to yield and stress tolerance. Yet from a preference and demand perspective, these traits may well be the reason why adoption of improved varieties remain low in many countries [12,53]. Therefore, understanding the trait trade-offs (choices) farmers are willing to make is important. To recap, no single variety can possess all the agronomic and consumption traits a farmer prefers (or requires). At some point, farmers (consumers) will be compelled to make rational trade-offs based on how they value the traits. This paper provides one of the needed analyses to improve our understanding of farmers' preferences for maize varieties in the smallholder grower segment in Ethiopia.In conclusion, the results indicate that maize varieties that have potential for yield improvement should also exhibit traits that confer drought and disease tolerance and where the market is sensitive, they should also satisfy end user consumption tastes. In areas where green maize markets are developed, the yield advantage of less tasty varieties may have to be quite substantial to win market share, especially if taste-sensitive green maize markets are strong. Extra early varieties are not necessarily preferred given their perceived low yields (at least in this environment) where locally adapted, higher yielding, medium (110-120-day) maturity hybrids are available. Given the high risks of pre-harvest losses from open tip and easily-lodging varieties, these varieties should not be advanced in any breeding pipelines meant for grain harvesting.We therefore suggest that when varieties in a particular market attain yield parity and drought tolerant (and other stress-tolerant) maize varieties become widely available, better tasting varieties will be preferred within the class of high-yielding and stress-tolerant varieties. Where drought challenges are not severe or only of a minor concern, such as in the humid highlands, it is conceivable that some farmers in those environments may be willing to forgo drought tolerant varieties in favor of sweet taste, where markets demand such. In mid-altitude sub-humid areas, where mid-season droughts may be a major production threat, drought tolerance traits will likely dominate in farmers' variety choices. Breeding programs could therefore consider approaches that carefully combine various desired attributes (such as taste, tolerance to pre-harvest losses and disease resistance) while enhancing drought tolerance and yield potential in varietal development.The study's main aim was to capture heterogeneity in preferences. While it is not possible to segment the market endlessly, the final and realistic segmentation will depend on the commercial viability or social impact potential of each segment. The weakness of the current seed markets in Ethiopia and the region is that the final seed products are not well-differentiated at the last-mile marketing and distribution level. Finally, we note that our study may not provide the full range of social and economic factors that drive variety choices. Future studies should focus on a deeper dive qualitative analyses to supplement quantitative approaches. These qualitative studies will need to highlight the social and economic forces not captured in econometric equations or which are important but may not be empirically testable."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2685829355.json b/main/part_2/2685829355.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6709bf1979ddd176281727d270aeeb43ae9c0c57 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2685829355.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2b5aa17a95fe1ab267a2ff991c6d74bb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H042696.pdf","id":"100489629"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"852dcbdd-2298-4dae-bfdd-eab4c6cf47b7","content":"This paper attempts to identify and evolve a method for valuing and estimating the net gains from domestic and industrial water supply from the interbasin transfer schemes contemplated in the National River Link Project (NRLP). An existing interbasin transfer (IBT) scheme, namely Indira Gandhi Nahar Project (IGNP) and a proposed IBT scheme namely Polavaram-Vijaywada (PV) Link Canal were chosen for detailed analyses. Secondary data were used for identifying the region and the populations that benefited from the schemes. Economic gains arising out of water supply to the actual or potentially benefited areas were estimated. The estimation involved assessment of current costs incurred by the people in the area, in terms of both paid-out costs and time spent in fetching water. The saving in time was valued at market wage rates prevalent in the area and paid-out costs were assessed in terms of current market prices, ignoring the administered prices involved. The gains to urban populations were assessed by estimating the reduction in energy costs incurred by municipal authorities in undertaking the supply. Amortized capital costs for putting necessary hardware for distributing water from the IBT schemes as well as operation and maintenance (O&M) costs of running these schemes were netted from the gains to obtain the figures for net economic gains. More indirect benefits such as reduced drudgery or improved educational performance as well as reduced health expenditure were recognized but were all ignored to ensure greater robustness in the estimates. Only net gains to the society were considered and hence gains arising out of creation of industrial estates within the commands were ignored since similar gains could also be obtained by locating these estates elsewhere. The net economic gains are seen to depend on both demographic features of the region and its ecology. Desert-like conditions of the IGNP-benefited areas tend to make the gains from domestic water supply schemes large, while similar gains in the Polavaram-Vijaywada areas are smaller. The net economic gains are of a significant order and would seem to indicate that, at least insofar as the dry areas of the country are concerned, these can perhaps exceed the gains due to increased agricultural production and hence could perhaps justify the creation of the schemes by themselves.The proposed project to build 37 links between the Himalayan and peninsular rivers in the country, together called the National River Link Project (NRLP), is a huge program, which would change the face of the countryside. It envisages transferring of some 178 billion cubic meters (Bm 3 ) of water through these links and making large quantities of water available for irrigation and other uses. The project does envisage benefits on three fronts: bringing additional areas under irrigation for producing the food that would be required to feed an estimated population of 1,580 million in the country; producing a huge amount of electricity by installing hydropower projects on the Himalayan rivers; building infrastructures useful for accomplishing water transfer, and delivering the supply of water for domestic and industrial uses in water-starved southern and western peninsular regions. Much discourse about the project revolves around the appropriateness of providing such extra irrigation through the link schemes while significant attention has also been given to aspects of environmental impacts and seismic stability of the structures on the Himalayan rivers. We believe that huge benefits of the project are in the supply of drinking water to literally millions of households and also in enabling industrial activity to take place in areas starved of water. We suggest that the economic benefits accruing from these end uses are likely to be far more significant than the irrigation benefits, particularly as there may be few alternatives to large-scale IBTs for supporting dozens of thickly populated and growing urban centers.According to recent experience from several large dams in the country (e.g., Narmada Dam, Jayakwadi Dam on the Godavari and scores of smaller projects elsewhere), they may be economically justified by looking at agricultural production they have enabled and the electricity produced on these structures. Their contribution is most striking in enabling the concerned state governments to augment and stabilize water supply for domestic purposes to cities, towns and villages and in supplying water to industrial estates. The Jayakwadi, for instance, not only sustains cities of Aurangabad and Jalna and several smaller townships by supplying drinking water but has enabled the Walunj and other industrial estates to flourish. The case of the Narmada Dam is even more pertinent. The project has not started irrigating more than a fraction of its proposed command but already the project has enabled the state government to augment and strengthen the water supply in over 200 cities and towns and in a few thousand villages. In fact, the Government of Gujarat has been proud in proclaiming its achievements in solving the drinking water crisis facing the difficult Saurashtra and Kutch areas. The case of many other projects originally designed as irrigation schemes is similar: the Pench project has turned out to be a boon in supporting the 3 million strong Najaur City; but for the Upper Wardha project, the neighboring Amravati District would have continued to face tough problems; the Nagarjuna-Sagar Dam gives water through the Telugu Ganga canal to Chennai City; Ujani supports Solapur and soon Godavari water will be taken to support Hyderbad-Secunderabad.The premise of this exercise is that irrespective of the planning objectives of the projects and the economic rationale on which they are justified, the various projects in the NRLP will, in fact, be used, whether directly or indirectly (through the substitution route), to a significant extent to address the question of supplying drinking water to populations facing the threat of unreliable water supply and to augment water supply to industrial estates and units which would find it difficult to carry out their industrial activities without water supply. The exercise looks at one existing instance of interbasin transfer of water (namely the IGNP, from the Indus to the Luni and other basins) and one proposed Polavaram-Vijaywada (PV) Link which would be one of the elements of the NRLP design. 1 The exercise is aimed at arriving at a broadly acceptable estimate of the (actual in case of IGNP or likely in the second case) net economic gain resulting from the use of water from these projects for domestic and industrial purposes. The tasks involved in the exercise include identifying the benefits in the industrial and domestic water supply that can be attributed to these projects, estimating the quantum of these gains and valuing them.The tasks of identifying attributive gains relate to identifying geographic areas covering cities, towns, villages and industrial estates to which the water from these projects actually flows or will actually flow. For this purpose, the use of maps and other secondary materials from concerned government offices is resorted to. The task of estimating the volume of gain consists of identifying the current and potential water needs of geographic areas where the gains due to water can be attributed to these schemes. This is an exercise in the projection of demographic changes and possibly industrial growth. The former is relatively simple and in conjunction with the work done under NRLP on demographic changes last year, it can be accomplished without much effort. The latter is speculative since the industrial growth in a region is a determinant of several factors, one of which is uninterrupted and adequate supply of water. Valuation remains an issue and will be discussed later.The Indira Gandhi Nahar Pariyojana (IGNP) with a command area of 1.543 million hectares (Mha) is the largest irrigation and drinking water project in northwestern Rajasthan. The project was taken up in three stages. The first stage has already been completed, the second was recently completed and the third is under execution. Stage II area of IGNP starts from Pugal and comprises the main canal from 620 RD to 1458 RD. The main canal gets water from the Sutlej River in Punjab through a feeder canal.The climate of the region is arid with an average annual rainfall of about 200-250 mm. The temperature ranges from freezing point in winter to above 50 o C in summer. The area covered by the IGNP consists of sandy undulating plains with various types of low-tomedium sand dunes. The thickness of sand cover varies from a few centimeters to 200 meters (m). The top aeolian soils have high permeability but the underlying sediments, comprising silty clay and kankar, have low permeability. Prior to introduction of the canal irrigation, only rain-fed agriculture was practiced. But the introduction of canal irrigation has changed the cultural practices. Groundwater was also not generally available before the introduction of this canal system. Barring a few sweet water locations along buried channels, groundwater where present, was deep and saline. The main cause of the rise in water tables in IGNP Stage-II command is the presence of a hard pan at shallow depths. This pan restricts the downward movement of the groundwater, resulting in the formation of perched water tables.The main soil types of the study area are deep and calcareous flood plain soils and sand dunes. The geology of the area is marked by aeolian sand and alluvium of quaternary age forming extensive sandy plains. Alluvium is mostly fluvial in origin and comprises unconsolidated to loosely consolidated sediments, consisting of an alternate sequence of sand, silt and clay with frequent lens of silty clays and kankar with occasional gravel horizons. Groundwater occurs in these alluvial sediments under water-table conditions. Groundwater is generally saline in most parts of the study area. The important components of groundwater recharge in the area are the IGNP canal system and their distributaries, Ghaggar Diversion Channel (constructed to divert the floodwater of Ghaggar River to inter-dunal depressions) and inter-dunal depressions south of Suratgarh. A substantial part of recharge is contributed by return flow of irrigation water and some by annual precipitation. The groundwater level in the area has been rising since the commencement of canal irrigation leading to waterlogging in the area. This high rise in groundwater levels has led to systematic monitoring of groundwater levels from the year 1981-82.Andhra Pradesh is bestowed with 108 Bm 3 of water from groundwater, local and interstate rivers out of which only 78 Bm 3 are usable (GoAP 2003 b) . The present total use is about 62.3 Bm 3 which are expected to reach 113 Bm 3 by 2025 assuming that 3.5, 108, 1.4 and 0.1 Bm 3 are required for drinking water, irrigation, industries and for power generation, respectively, Hence, by 2025, the total water demand would have crossed the total availability.Besides, about 36% of rural habitations and 72% of urban bodies still do not have adequate drinking water facilities. The key water challenge in the state is increasing demand for industrial and domestic water, which will have to be met from the present allocation to the agriculture sector.Long-distance interbasin transfer of water from water-surplus basins to water-deficit basins has been mooted in India in order to reduce the imbalance in the water availability among various regions. A National Perspective Plan (NPP) was formulated in 1980 by the Union Ministry of Irrigation (now Ministry of Water Resources) and the Central Water Commission, identifying a number of interbasin water transfer links in respect of both the peninsular and the Himalayan rivers of the country. The Peninsular Rivers Development and the Himalayan Rivers Development components put together were expected to create an additional irrigation potential of 35 Mha besides hydropower potential and other benefits.The interlinking of Mahanadi-Godavari-Krishna-Pennar-Cauvery is one of the four parts of the Peninsular Rivers Development Component of the NPP. Amongst the peninsular rivers, the Mahanadi and the Godavari have sizeable surpluses after meeting the existing and projected requirements within the basins. It is, therefore, proposed to divert the surplus water of the Mahanadi and the Godavari to the water-short river basins: the Krishna, the Pennar and the Cauvery. Three water transfer links have been proposed, connecting Godavari to Krishna, forming part of the interlinking. They are: (i) Inchampalli-Nagarjunasagar, (ii) Inchampalli-Pulichintala, and (iii) Polavaram-Vijayawada. This report deals with the feasibility of the third link, i.e., diversion of a part of the surplus Godavari water from the proposed Polavaram Reservoir to the Prakasam Barrage on the Krishna River through the Godavari (Polavaram).The National Water Development Agency (NWDA) has been carrying out water balance and other studies on a scientific and realistic basis for optimum utilization of water resources for preparing feasibility reports and thus to give concrete shape to the proposals of the NPP. The objective of preparing the feasibility report is mainly to facilitate firming up of the proposals and for discussions among the concerned states to arrive at broad agreements on the quantum of diversions and utilizations of water, sharing of cost and benefits, etc. This report has been prepared keeping in view the various comments offered by the governments of Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka on the topo-sheet study and pre-feasibility study of the Godavari (Polavaram)-Krishna (Vijayawada) Link project.The Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal (GWDT) award stipulates, among other provisions, transfer of 2,265 Mm 3 of water from Godavari at Polavaram to Krishna above the Prakasam Barrage at Vijayawada, thereby displacing the discharges from Nagarjunasagar project for the Krishna Delta, and thus enabling the use of the above quantity for projects upstream of Nagarjunasagar. However, considering the possible full development of irrigation in the basin and projected in-basin uses for domestic and industrial requirements up to the year 2025 and also considering the proposed transfer of 6,500 Mm 3 from Mahanadi to Godavari through the Mahanadi (Manibhadra)-Godavari (Dowlaiswaram) Link, NWDA by simulation studies, has assessed that it is possible to transfer an additional quantity of 1,236 Mm 3 through the proposed Polavaram-Vijayawada Link Canal from Godavari to Krishna. An equal quantity of water can be made available for possible use in the water-short upper regions of the Krishna Basin by way of substitution. The Polavaram project has been formulated by the Government of Andhra Pradesh for the utilization of Godavari water for irrigation and other benefits by creating a reservoir and canal systems at Polavaram about 42 km upstream of the existing Godavari Barrage at Dowlaiswaram near Rajamundry. The Polavaram project will also cater to the transfer of 2,265 Mm 3 of Godavari water to Krishna as agreed to by the states concerned and reflected in the GWDT award. A detailed project report on the Polavaram project has been prepared by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. The project proposals include the construction of an earth-cum-rockfill dam across Godavari at Polavaram for creating a reservoir of 2,130 Mm 3 live storage capacity; a Left Main Canal with a capacity of 250 m 3 /sec. for providing irrigation to a culturable command area (CCA) of 1,74,978 ha and supplying 664 Mm 3 to the steel plant and other industries of Visakhapatnam; and a Right Main Canal with a capacity of 453 m 3 /sec. for providing irrigation to a CCA of 139,740 ha besides transferring 2,265 Mm 3 of Godavari water to Krishna. The project also includes a hydropower component for generating 60 MW of firm power with an installed capacity of 720 MW.The Polavaram-Vijayawada Link Canal now proposed by NWDA and detailed in this feasibility report will be incorporated in the Polavaram project of Andhra Pradesh. The link canal will replace the Right Main Canal of the Polavaram project. In fact, the alignment of the link canal has been proposed to be the same as that of the Right Main Canal as proposed by the State Government.The Godavari (Polavaram)-Krishna (Vijayawada) Link Canal takes off from the right bank of Godavari at the proposed Polavaram Reservoir. The canal, after traversing 174 km, falls into the Budameru River (which drains into the Kolleru Lake) at a point upstream of the Velagaleru regulator. From the regulator, the canal water is let into the existing Budameru Diversion Channel that, after traversing 12 km, joins the Krishna River at about 8 km upstream of the existing Prakasam Barrage at Vijayawada. Diversion of 5,325 Mm 3 of water is envisaged through the canal. This will cater to (i) a transfer of 2,265 Mm 3 to the Krishna Delta as committed under the GWDT award, (ii) an en-route irrigation requirement of 1,402 Mm 3 , (iii) en-route domestic and industrial requirements of 162 Mm 3 , and (iv) transmission losses of 260 Mm 3 . The remaining 1,236 Mm 3 of water will be utilized for stabilizing the existing ayacut under the Krishna Delta. With 1,402 Mm 3 of water available for en-route irrigation, an area of 139,740 ha (CCA) will be benefited with 150% intensity of irrigation. The entire canal and the command areas lie in Andhra Pradesh.The total length of the link canal from Polavaram to Budameru will be 174 km. The canal will pass through West Godavari and Krishna districts of Andhra Pradesh. The design discharge at the head of the canal is 405.12 m 3 /sec. The canal will be trapezoidal and lined throughout its length. The bed width will be 68.5 m and full supply depth 4.9 m. The bed slope will be 1: 20,000. The link canal is proposed to be operated throughout the year.The total cost of the Polavaram-Vijayawada Link project including the cost of command area development, but excluding the apportioned cost of head works, i.e., Polavaram Dam and appurtenant works, is estimated to be Rs 14,839.1 million at the 1994-95 price level. The net value of annual benefits from irrigation in the en-route command due to the project works out to Rs 2,011 million against the annual cost of Rs 1,646.274 million. Thus, the benefit:cost ratio works out to 1.22.The structures including the main link canal pass through the districts of East and West Godavari and Krishna. These two districts have coastal alluvial soils in the east of the canal and lateritic soils on the western parts of the canal. The western parts tend to be on a higher elevation and water from the canal will not flow to them under gravity. The deltaic regions are agriculturally very rich with crops such as sugarcane, paddy, banana and oil palm. Tobacco is grown extensively on both the eastern and the western land masses of the canal. The Koleru Lake widely known for its fish production lies to the east of the canal. The region has a tropical humid climate.There is widespread scarcity of potable water in the northwestern part of the state, which is the area under IGNP. In the first place, groundwater is generally saline and unfit for human consumption. Second, the existing surface water resources are not adequate or dependable. The canal has become in its true sense a \"life line\" for this area. When the first revised estimates for Stage-II of IGNP were sanctioned in May 1972, the available quantity of water was to be used for agricultural purposes besides meeting the drinking water requirements of the villages and abadis located in the command areas. Subsequently, requirements for water for drinking and industrial purposes went on increasing. A provision of 1,073 Mm 3 was kept for nonagricultural purposes in the 1984 revised estimate of the project. The Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), vested with the task of provision of drinking water, asked for more reservation of water for drinking and industrial activities in the command area on the basis of expected population rise in the following two decades.The PHED supplies, on average, 1,344 million liters of water a day. Surface water contributes 604 million liters (45% of the total), and groundwater the remaining 740 million liters for Rajasthan (Tables 1 and 2). It is being proposed to provide water from IGNP not only for the project area but also for cities and villages located outside the command area. At present, IGNP water is being supplied to villages and towns partly or fully in eight districts. Two more districts will be added. Ultimately, a population of about 20 million located in 24 cities/towns and 5,300 villages/settlements would draw drinking water supplies form this canal by the year 2045 (GoR 2002).Sources of drinking water in the areas of PV Link canal are the main groundwater-based. Vishakhapattanam City slated to be among the main beneficiaries of the link in terms of supply of water for domestic and industrial applications (Table 3). At present, out of a total 65.12 Bm 3 water use, drinking water supply is 0.59 and industrial water use is 0.28 Bm 3 , while irrigation receives the lion's share of 64.21 Bm 3 (GoAP 2003 b). There are several issues such as inequality in distribution of water supply in rural as well as urban areas, deterioration of water quality due to municipal/domestic, industrial and agricultural pollution, pricing of water, competing interests in the use and management of water and more efficient use of water in all the sectors. According to the Public Health and Municipal Engineering Department of the Government of Andhra Pradesh, only 33 out of 117 municipal bodies are being supplied with adequate water. An average supply of only 48 liters per capita per day (lpcd) could be achieved against the standards of 140 lpcd. Out of the 69,732 rural population in the stateprotected area, water supply has been provided to only 44,951, and the remaining population is yet to be supplied with water. Nearly 75% of the rural drinking water requirement is met using groundwater, which is around 800 Mm 3 and likely to be 876 Mm 3 by the year 2020 (Table 4). Already, a population of more than 21,000 is affected with poor-quality groundwater (Panchayati Raj Rural Development Department RWS). According to the Public Health and Municipal Engineering Department of the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the cost of water supply from groundwater sources (bore wells and subsurface water) is Rs 5 per kiloliter while that from surface water sources is Rs 10 per kiloliter; at the same time, the cost recovery is only Rs 2.25 per kiloliter. At present, diversion of surface water for drinking water schemes is 5 mld, 14 mld million liters per day and 10 mld from Godavari, Krishna and Pennar river basins, respectively. In the future, the quantity of water diverted will have to be increased to 414, 378 and 90 mld from Godavari, Krishna and Pennar river basins, respectively (GoAP 2003b).Except for some village-level wool manufacturing and leather and carpentry works, there were hardly any industries in the project area before IGNP. In 1951, there were 17 registered factories in Sri Ganganagar District, which rose to 85 in 1961. By 1980, the figure went up to 828, with 14,500 employees. The major contribution in the rapid growth of industries between 1961 and 1981 is due to IGNP, after the project commenced in this region in 1961. Now there are many agro-based industries flourishing in the project area.Andhra Pradesh ranks sixth in industrial production in India. Major industries cover information technology, bulk drugs and pharmaceuticals, basin chemicals, agro-processing, mineral-based industries, metal industries, engineering, textiles, leather, cement, sugar, power, fertilizers, gems, jewelry, papers, petrochemicals, etc. There are 242 industrial estates in the states, 3,055 medium-and large-scale units, 16,000 registered factories and 140,000 registered small-scale industries. A considerable concentration of industries can be found around the Hyderabad and Vishakhapatanam urban conglomeration. Employment in the industries increased from 0.4% in 1961 to 1.5% in 2000. By 2025, the industrial sector is expected to grow 13-fold at a growth rate of 11% per annum (GoAP 2003b). Industrial water requirement is likely to increase to 1.44 Bm 3 by 2025 from the present 0.28 Bm 3 .In the IGNP areas, water quality issues are connected with high levels of total dissolved solids (TDS) in groundwater. Fluoride contamination is known to occur in several patches in the area. The problem caused by high TDS and fluoride is exacerbating over time, and one of the chief advantages of the domestic water supply from IGNP is seen as the reduction in health syndromes arising out of poor water quality. In fact, the areas severely affected with these issues will be given priority in the supply of domestic water from the IGNP and the task of establishing relevant structures is expected to be completed by 2010.The issues of water quality in the PV Link Canal areas are somewhat muted at this point in time. Coastal salinity ingress in the East Godavari District has been reported to be rising. Also, chemicals used in coastal aquaculture are said to be causing groundwater pollution which is on the rise in the Krishna District. The supply of drinking water to these areas is thus likely to have positive though somewhat less-prominent effects.This review mainly relates to literature pertaining to valuation of domestic and industrial water gains. Possible methods of valuation include the Techniques of Valuation (source: www.ecosystemvaluation.org accessed on 5 October 2006). Historically, there are four major techniques that have been used to estimate economic value of ecosystem services. In this study we used the economic value of IBT water for domestic and industrial purposes.This approach is used to estimate the economic value of ecosystem services or products (in this study, IBT water), which contribute to the production of a market good (textile in the case of the textile manufacturing unit in Jodhpur). The production function approach can then be used to find out how changes in the quantity or quality of water supply through transfer of IBT water affect the quality or quantity of water in terms of price change (Consumer Surplus 2 ) or cost changes (Producer Surplus 3 ). This method is applicable when the particular resource in question is a perfect substitute for other substitutes for other inputs (e.g., import of fresh IBT water results in less usage of treatment chemicals of hitherto polluted groundwater). However, the method suffers from a critical problem of attribution where the particular resource may not be related clearly or solely to the production of marketed goods (that provision of IBT water may not be the sole reason why production will rise or, in other cases, may not be related to production of marketed goods as in the case of provision for drinking purposes).The TCM is used to estimate the economic value of ecosystem services used for recreational purposes. The value of a new water body used for recreational purposes having both use and nonuse values (use value as boating and fishing and nonuse value as mere enjoyment of watching good scenery) is analyzed using TCM. The crux of this method is based on the Revealed Preference Approach where actual spending of a visitor in terms of Actual Travel Cost and Opportunity Cost of time spent in travel which are combined together and plotted against the rate of visits to derive a demand function that surrogates the number of visits purchased at different prices. The Consumer Surplus from this demand function is then used to calculate the economic value of this resource. Since we do not consider any recreational component in our study we opt not to use this technique.The CVM is used to estimate the economic value of environments and ecosystem services and can be used for both use and nonuse values. This technique aims to compute individuals' willingness to pay contingent on certain hypothetical scenarios. Thus, the crux of this technique is based on the stated preference approach. This technique is particularly used where the value of an ecosystem service is mostly nonuse in nature and does not involve any market purchase. In this context, the import of fresh IBT water in a high TDS area will actually recharge groundwater and dilute the TDS content. But this passive use of IBT water remains outside the market, which can be captured through this method. Although flexible, the methodology of asking people questions rather than observing their behavior has made the technique very controversial and the economic value computed using this technique is generally taken with a pinch of salt!The cost-based approach of valuation is often used to estimate the economic value of ecosystem services in terms of Damage Cost Avoided, Replacement Cost and Substitute Cost. The approach is based on the theoretical assumption that if the people incur costs to avoid damages or provision for substitute services in the absence of the service in question then the services must be worth at least what is paid to avoid, replace or substitute those services. Damage Cost Avoided Method uses either the value of property protected or the cost of actions taken to avoid damages as a measure of economic value of that service. In the context of this study, the cost incurred in setting up a filtration plant or reverse osmosis (RO) plant in the case of industrial use or fuel cost in boiling water in the case of domestic use would be an appropriate surrogate of value of supply of fresh IBT water for domestic and industrial purposes.The Replacement Cost Method uses the cost of replacing an ecosystem or its services as an estimate of the value of those services. In the context of our study, if high TDS content of groundwater causes erosion of boilers in the chilling plant of URMUL Dairy and thus compels the industry to frequently replace the boiler or if a textile unit located in Jodhpur plans to shift its entire production unit to another place because the contaminated groundwater in Jodhpur actually affects their production then the cost of this replacement or relocation can act as a surrogate value of supplying fresh IBT water to industrial units.The Substitute Cost Method uses the cost of providing substitute services as an estimate of the economic value of the ecosystem service. In the case of our study, the value of supplying fresh IBT water could be the extra cost that the people (or units) incur while extracting groundwater (which may include both pumping cost and quality impacts) or opportunity cost in the case of an alternate source (in the case of purchase of tanker water or walking long distances to a canal source or another village source to collect freshwater).Humans and cattle, among others, have to obtain a minimum supply of water for survival. The costs involved in obtaining the water are direct, indirect as well as in the nature of opportunity gain/loss.• Direct costs are those costs the consumers pay.• Indirect costs are those imposed upon the users due to aspects of reliability and water quality.• Opportunity gains or losses arise out of saving or increase in drudgery, labor, investment (saving) of time and the consequential effects such as reduction in dropping in school attendance, effect on health, etc. Direct costs paid out for obtaining water supply from alternative sources are the easiest to justify save for the fact that in a majority of the cases there is a significant element of subsidy given by state agencies to the actual users. Thus, the costs paid out by actual user households are not economic costs. 4 The economic costs are absorbed by the water supply agencies and the decisions on water levies to users are taken on the basis of parameters only one of which is these direct paid-out costs. Thus, wherever households use water supplied by public agencies, we need to look at costs incurred by these agencies and not by the households themselves except so far as the households have to resort to self-provisioning when the public institutions perform inadequately or unreliably. An assessment of the reliability and adequacy of the water supply by public agencies and the costs paid out by users when the water from these sources is not available is therefore necessary. The costs paid out by these agencies would be in the nature of revenue expenditure on staff salaries, maintenance and power consumption, etc., as well as amortized components of the capital costs in installing water extraction, storage, and purification and distribution systems. Some of these systems are/would be used by these agencies even if the IBT water replaces current sources. Further, the use of IBT water would perhaps entail installation of devices for conveying water from canal heads to cities, etc. The gain to the system is therefore the difference between the existing paid-out costs and the new costs.Indirect costs arise due to effects of water quality. Wherever groundwater has high TDS or has contaminants such as fluorine, treatment costs as well as costs in terms of lost wages are imposed on users. Efforts have been exerted elsewhere to quantify these costs. There is a wide diversity in situations concerning occurrence of contaminants and dissolved salts across the region where IBT water is expected to flow in both the regions. Second, the assessment of treatment costs and lost wages is a somewhat speculative exercise. In view of this, although we propose to recognize these costs exist we choose to ignore them.Householders who had to fetch water from far-off sources previously get opportunity gains. Since fetching water is a task most often left to women and children of the households, the task imposes severe drudgery on women and also leads to reduced attendance in schools and health effects on young children. Easier and smoother supply of water using IBT water coming into the village reduces this drudgery and investment of time and also contributes to enhanced health and school attendance. Among these costs, the most directly measurable are the \"equivalent lost wage costs\" for the time an adult woman has to spend on fetching water, assuming, of course, that she has wage opportunities available on all the days of the year. The gains due to health effects or increased attendance in schools, etc., are real but pose much difficulty in valuation as they involve speculative assessment. Hence, we will consider only the reduction in lost wage opportunity as the net gain due to IBT water.Often, industrial activity in a location in India fails to come up only for want of a reliable water supply. It is only when the entire value-addition in the industries which progress in a location after IBT water reaches it that it can be directly attributed to the water supply. However, it can be argued that industries which fail to progress in place A do so in place B within the country. As one is looking at costs and benefits at the national level and so long as one does not explicitly place a value on a specific location of industries this is not a material consideration.To argue that a certain industrial activity arises solely because water has become available from IBT is untenable unless one can demonstrate that water at a specific place has a particular contribution which another place would not have. In view of this, we do not choose to value industrial activity made possible by the arrival of water from IBT at the full value-added level.The other advantage of water supply from IBT water comes in two forms. The first is in avoidance of costs (both, amortized capital costs and revenue costs of electricity consumed, etc.) incurred in obtaining water from alternative sources. Thus, if an industrial unit obtains water from groundwater sources and subsequently starts obtaining water from IBT sources, then the net consideration is the savings made by the industrial unit in terms of electricity consumed, etc. The second benefit arises from the fact that the treatment costs on freshwater supply from canals in the IBT schemes may possibly be lower than the treatment costs for water obtained from alternative sources. It is tenable to argue that costs in demineralizing water obtained from IBT sources would be smaller compared to those in demineralizing water from groundwater sources (Kumar et al. 2002). The third benefit that arises in certain cases is because use of better-quality water may enhance the quality of the product and hence fetch a better price. We propose to consider these three benefits. b. Primary data at the level of households and villages were obtained by conducting a primary survey as outlined below.The survey was conducted in 10 districts of Rajasthan. In eight districts IGNP water is being supplied for drinking and industrial purposes. These are Hanumangarh, Sri Ganganagar, Bikaner, Churu, Jhunjhanu, Jaisalmer, Jodhpur and Barmer. Sikar and Najaur will receive IGNP water very shortly. By and large, the study covered 497 households from 50 villages of 10 districts. The data represent the population of more than 225,000.The sample villages were identified based on three criteria: villages depending upon canal water, villages depending solely on groundwater and villages with a combination of these two. Cities were identified based on the urban classifications, i.e., Class-I to Class-VI. Representative towns/cities from all the urban classes were identified for the sample survey. Altogether, 17 towns/cities were identified. Lists of the sample villages and towns/cities are given in Tables 10 and 15. Households in these villages were identified randomly. In most of the villages, one household from each vaas (hamlet) was identified and the householders interviewed with the help of a questionnaire. The household survey form comprised information related to family members, age, income, primary and alternative sources of drinking water during normal and scarcity periods, direct cost paid out to obtain the water, time spent to collect from sources, etc.Apart from the household survey, village-level information was collected using the village-level survey form, which mainly covered data pertaining to water supply, its source, head works, methods of water supply, number of connections, tariff structure and recovery, type of treatment given, etc. Similarly, town-and city-level survey forms were filled out. These forms were filled out by the survey team as per the information given by the administrative personnel. The survey was conducted by a team of five persons from December 2006 to February 2007. This team had conducted surveys in all the 10 districts in around 10 weeks' time. To reduce sample biases, the same survey team had covered all the sample villages and households.A similar procedure was followed in Andhra Pradesh. The survey work was done in Vishakhapattanam, East Godavari, West Godavari and Krishna districts. In these districts, 359 households in 36 villages were covered. The survey instruments for the two regions of IGNP canal command area and PV Link were the same. These were translated into the local language and administered with the help of the partners: URMUL Trust in the case of IGNP and a consultant, Nikhil Mathur, in the case of AP. Prior to a full-fledged survey, the instruments were tested in Anand and the two respective areas.Data from urban centers were obtained through personal interviews with the appropriate municipal authorities as well as selected key informants as outlined below. In urban centers, information from the secondary sources was collected to determine the cost paid out by the households. Survey of tanker water suppliers, interviews of water supply department engineers, and several indirect methods were used to estimate the economic costs of urban water scarcity. These include using alternative costs of shortages paid out by the households and the average number of days of water scarcity.In the IGNP areas, 497 households were surveyed. In the sample, the average age of the respondents was 47 years, while the average family size was 7.3 persons per household, with the lowest, 5.9, in Barmer and the highest, 9.5, in Bikaner. A family's average monthly income was found to be Rs 3,643. The highest monthly income (Rs 5,909) was found in the Sikar District and the lowest (Rs 2,481) in Churu. Mean monthly income was found to be Rs 3,646 (Table 5). The occupations of the heads of the households are given in Table 6. As can be determined, 35% of the households were agriculturists, 43% engaged in other diverse occupations and the rest primarily wage earners, mostly in agriculture.Households discussed problems of fetching domestic water in \"normal\" months and \"months of scarcity.\" The durations of the normal and scarcity periods across the sampled villages are given in Annex 1, and for districts are in Table 7. The average water consumption (liters per capita per day, lpcd) by households as well as the storage capacity (in number of days of supply) created by the households at the home level are given in Table 8. The average water consumption in the study area is 47.1 lpcd and mean storage capacity is about a week. It may be noted that a few households had in-house sanitation facilities and, hence, that this suppresses the daily water consumption. The data on consumption and storage were related to reported household incomes. The difference in consumption levels as well as storage capacity across income levels is insignificant (Table 9). Note: Average water use and storage capacity in number of days may not be the same in Tables 8 and 9, as around 10% of samples did not give information about the monthly income.Table 10 shows the main source of domestic water for the households. There are three groups of villages: those adjacent to the canal as they get their water from the canal without the creation of any new systems; those which are primarily dependent on the groundwater and will eventually be brought under the schemes and the third group where both sources are currently in use. The data show that 307 households depended on groundwater for their domestic water requirements (Table 10). The average travel distance to fetch water as per the main source of village is given in Table 12. This is given for the normal period and the scarcity time. Not many people rely on alternative sources during normal time and similarly not many people rely on primary sources during scarcity time. Very interestingly, it was found that villagers depending only on groundwater sources were traveling longer distances than those depending on canal water sources. The fees were paid not only to owners of water sources including the Panchayats, but also to tanker suppliers and other individuals or institutions. The data show that households paid, on average, Rs 6.50 per month for fetching their water during normal periods and around Rs 24 per month during scarcity periods (Table 13). Many people did not pay any fee for water including Panchayats (188 of 497 respondents). Similarly, it can be seen from the Table that the cost paid by the people residing in canal water supplied villages was lesser than that paid by villagers depending on groundwater. It was found in the samples that the average paid-out cost for water was 4% of the income though it varied from 0% to 40%The time spent by the households in fetching their water each day as well as the breakup of this time across the category of individuals engaged in the task are given in Table 14. It was found that average time taken to fetch water was higher during a normal period than in a scarcity period. Of the 16 urban centers studied, four obtained their domestic water purely from surface water sources, another four from both surface water and groundwater sources while the remaining eight depended entirely on groundwater. The mean water supply given to these centers by the municipal authorities ranged between 70 and 191 lpcd (Table 15). There are no major industries in the ten districts where the survey was undertaken except for a few thermal-or lignite-based power projects (the information for the same is given in the report in the subsequent section). Altogether, 25 industries were surveyed, which covered cotton ginning mills, textiles, agro-based industries, food processing units and others. All the samples were from small-scale industries. We found that almost all the industries depended on the Rajasthan Industrial Investment Corporation (RIICO, Government of Rajasthan) for water supply for daily needs. The water supply by RIICO is often not enough; hence, undersupplied water was managed from private bore wells. Now, very few industrial estates are supplied with IGNP water by RIICO.Industrial estates in Hanumangadh and two industrial estates in Bikaner are currently supplied with IGNP canal water. Quality requirement of water varies across industries. Industrial water requirement is mainly for process and waste disposal (chemical, pulp and paper, petroleum refining and primary metal) and cooling (thermal power plants). Except for most of the small-scale industries (SSI), water is mainly required for drinking, sprinkling, gardening and other housekeeping activities. A modicum of water is needed for these purposes. Among the SSI, only textile units (bleaching and dying units) need water preferably potable. If the desirable quality and quantity of water are supplied or undersupplied to these industries, the latter manage to get the water from private tanker owners, who normally get water from groundwater from nearby sources. For example, in the Balotara industrial estate of Pachpadra block of Barmer District, textile units for bleaching are flourishing because of the rich groundwater aquifer. But the quality of water is still not good enough for dying the bleached cloths. Jodhpur enjoys a great advantage because of its good-quality (less-saline) canal water (IGNP) and its proximity to Balotara; all the dying work is carried out in the textile units of the Jodhpur industrial estates.The average age of the respondents in the Vijaywada project was 39 years while the average family size was five. The district-wise details are given in Table 16. Almost half the population was associated with agriculture, either in direct farming or as agricultural laborers (Table 17). It was seen that water supply in the region is quite reliable. A very few days in a year were felt to be water-scarce compared to the IGNP area in Rajasthan (Table 18). The average water consumption was found to be 72 liters per person per day. Because of an ensured water source (groundwater or surface water) the need for household storage was very low. On average, the storage for only half the daily water requirement was created at the household level (Table 19). The average distances of sources of water for villagers are given in Table 20. The average distance traveled was 1.6 km during the normal period and 2.3 km during the scarcity period. The total number of samples surveyed in the Polavaram-Vijaywada project are given in Table 21. Around 300 samples were taken from villages depending on groundwater and 50 samples were taken from villages depending on surface water. Ten samples were identified from a village having both surface water and groundwater as a source of domestic water use. Table 22 shows the average paid-out cost for water to private suppliers and also to the Panchayat. On average, Rs 7 was spent by families, with a maximum of Rs 1 in the Krishna District and around Rs 15 in the West Godavari District. The data show the time spent by household members for each category, i.e., male, female and child during normal and scarcity periods. On average, an hour was spent by each category to fetch water during normal periods. The time taken during the scarcity period was 2-4 hours, spent by adult female or male members of the household. Child labor for fetching water was used only in the West Godavari District (Tables 23 and 24). One of the most important duties of the PV project are to fulfill the needs of the industrial sector, flourishing in Vishakhapatnam, East Godavari and West Godavari districts. Vishakhapatnam is an especially important industrial and port city. There are large and water-intensive industries around Vishakhapatnam, such as the Vizag Steel Plant, NTPC, BHPV, HPCL, Hindustan Zinc, etc. In 2004, the Vishakhapatnam Industrial Water Supply Project (VIWSP) 6 was conceived to 6The Vishakapatnam Industrial Water Supply Project (VIWSP) envisages capacity augmentation of the existing 153 km long Yeleru Left Bank Canal (YLBC) system in the East Godavari District of Andhra Pradesh, on a Build Own Operate Transfer (BOOT) basis. The YLBC presently delivers about 180 million liters per day (mld) of water from the Yeleru Reservoir to the Visakhapatnam Steel Plant (VSP). The demand in the immediate future 260 mld, would in the long run, increase to 600 mld.. The other beneficiaries will include the NTPC Power Plant, Parvada Industrial Development Area, the Vishakapatnam Municipal Corporation, the proposed Special Economic Zone and the proposed Gangavaram Port near Vishakapatnam and other upcoming industries in the Vishakapatnam-Kakinada belt.fulfill the industrial sector's water requirement around Vishakhapatnam. Initially, a 388 mld water supply project from the Yeleru Reservoir through the 153 km long Yeleru Canal and another 388 mld water supply project from the Godavari River through a 56 km long MS (mild steel) pipeline were commissioned. It was envisaged that supply provision would double once the Polavaram project is completed.The basic premise, on which our methodology is based, is to find out the cost paid for the NEXT BEST option for the water. The difference of the cost between IGNP benefited villages/ towns/cities and non-benefited areas (depending solely on groundwater) would be the direct benefit accrued. This will be calculated based on the following formula:V 1 = (P 1 -P 2 ) x Q 1 where, P 1 = price in non-benefited area P 2 = price in benefited area Q 1 = quantity of water used in non-benefited area.In addition to this, there is a value in the time saved each day in fetching water because people may now use that time for work or other activities.where, T1 = time spent water hauling in non-benefited area Q 1 = quantity of water used in non-benefited area T 2 = time spent water hauling in benefited area Q 2 = quantity of water used in benefited area W = wage rate for time spent on water hauling (daily or hourly as appropriate)While the above difference gives the gross benefit, the net gain due to IBT would be obtained by removing the amortized capital costs of the hardware necessary for bringing the IBT scheme water to villages/cities and the O&M costs on these schemes. Thus, an estimate of these two would have to be deducted from the gross benefit.Second, for the urban centers, we have data from the municipal authorities. The rate at which urban consumers are charged for water is an administrative decision of the concerned authority and need not enter our calculation. The actual cost incurred is the cost of accessing water as of now and the gain is likely to accrue from reduction in this access cost. For the eight cities dependent on groundwater alone this access cost is essentially the cost of pumping the water from underground aquifers. This is assessed by considering the volume and fixing a standard rate for power consumption per unit of water as well as a standard power rate of Rs 4 per kWh. The pumping cost would vary by the depth of the aquifer in the concerned city and the age of equipment. While refinement in these numbers is possible, we have taken representative numbers for illustrating the gain.Under the Apni Yojana scheme, the cost of establishing water supply infrastructure to the urban and rural people in the study areas has been estimated at Rs 4 billion. The estimated life of the scheme is 30 years. We have assumed this to be the gross capital cost in creating infrastructure for reaching the IGNP water for domestic purposes. The O&M costs currently average 15% of the capital costs. We have used these values and have also done sensitivity analyses on the economic life of the scheme as well as on the level of O&M costs.Similar data for industrial water supply are not available. Water infrastructure along with other infrastructure are created by RIICO, and the industrial unit located in an estate charges for it in accordance with the industrial policy in the state. We have assumed that the cost of accessing water is paid out by RIICO at the same level as the above cost of the Apni Yojana.Similarly, the cost of water supply from the canal was calculated as Rs 10 per m 3 for Andhra Pradesh (GoAP 2003 b)Current paid-out costs per household and hence per m 3 for non-benefited areas are given in Table 27. 7 Cost of canal water supply has been calculated from a piped drinking water supply project in Churu and Jhunjhunu districts of Rajasthan called Apni Yojna. Total cost was Rs 4 billion and catering to the population of 900,000 (approximately 700,000 rural and 200,000 urban). There are several assumptions taken; [1] life of the project would be 50 years, [2] urban population growth rate 2% and rural growth rate at 1.2% per annum [3] O&M 20% of capital cost and inflation 5%, [5] rural water supply at 70 lpcd and urban at 200 lpcd.It is estimated that a rural population of 5 million is being supplied by IGNP water. The total rural population in these 10 districts is around 15 million. Hence, a population of around 10 million is still depending on groundwater. Two scenarios are given here. One is as per the present level of consumption of water, which, in average, is 47 lpcd and less than the standard norms. Scenario 2 has been calculated as per the standard norms of 70 lpcd (Table 28). Hence, economic benefits at the present water consumption level of 47 lpcd would be around Rs 4.7-5.3 billion per annum (Table 28). Similarly, water supply as per the standard would be Rs 6.9-7.8 billion per annum.The urban population of Hanumangarh, Ganganagar District, and a part of the population of Bikaner City, Churu Town are being supplied IGNP water. According to an estimate based on the data available from IGNP only 1.2 million of the total urban population of around 5 million in these 10 districts are supplied with IGNP water. Another 3.8 million of urban population needs to be supplied with IGNP water (Table 29). The average present water supply in the urban area is 112 lpcd. If the same supply level is maintained then the net economic gain would be Rs 31 million per annum. If we consider a supply standard of 200 lpcd, then the economic benefits would be Rs 55.5 million per annum. The total net economic gain in the domestic sector in the IGNP area is Rs 4.681 billion and on the conservative side it is Rs 7.875 billion.The total electricity generation by the power projects in the region is, on average, 3,200 million units annually. The average water needed to produce this quantity of electricity would be 496 million liters (Ml) (GoI 1999): wastewater generation rate for the thermal power plant is 155 X 10 3 liters/hour/megawatt. We assume no consumptive use to be on a higher side. The total electricity required to withdraw 496 Ml of groundwater (assuming the alternative source is groundwater) at 0.05 kWh per m 3 would be 24.8 million units. If we attribute these units at the rate of Rs 4.00 per unit, the total attributable cost would be Rs 99.2 million.The net benefits from drinking water supply may be seen in Table 30. It is estimated that presently, out of a total rural population of 17 million, 9 million are still using groundwater. Two scenarios are given here (Table 31). One is as per the present level of consumption of water that, in average, is 72 lpcd. Hence, scenario 2 will not be different from it. A few of the urban pockets in the West Godavari and East Godavari districts are being supplied by the Eluru canal network. The estimated population based on the data available would be 3.5 million, which can be catered to from the Polavaram project (Table 32). The present level of water supply in the urban area is quite low. Its average is 50 lpcd. The net economic gain at the present level of water supply would be around Rs 9 million while at 200 lpcd of water supply the net economic gain would be Rs 35.7 million. The total net gain in the domestic sector in the Polavaram project would be Rs 0.307 billion at the lower side and Rs 1.203 billion at the higher side.As mentioned in the previous sections, industries around Vishakhapatnam and Gangavaram port are withdrawing water from the Godavari River. Eventually, after the completion of the Polavaram project the water supply capacity would be doubled. Hence, we do not attribute additional net gains due to a future Polavaram project (Table 33). An attempt has been made here to estimate the net economic gains from water supply from IBT schemes to domestic and industrial sectors. The exercise is important for the chief reason that seldom does an exercise that aims for economic gains from schemes for creating large water structures explicitly consider the economic gains accruing from the use of water for domestic and industrial purposes per se. Investments in these schemes are sought to be justified by estimating the net contribution these schemes make in terms of increased production in the agriculture sector and, in the case of multipurpose schemes, in terms of value of electricity produced. Benefits such as domestic and industrial supply are mentioned but their values are not computed. We have adopted what we consider the most defensible method. The schemes are expected to supply water to domestic and industrial users. These users currently draw their supplies from some existing sources, such as groundwater. In doing so, they have to incur expenditure on energy for pumping water; and also spend hours trudging to the source of water. We have basically captured the benefits in terms of reduced energy costs and time spent on fetching water. These two benefits accrue to the economy via the agents who are directly benefited. We have valued energy at the market rate and the time saved at the going wage rate.There is a likelihood of a dispute about valuing time as it involves the tacit assumptions that there is abundant demand for labor and that time saved from daily chores of collecting water would be automatically sold in the market. Both these can be questioned on the grounds of their relevance to reality. Yet we submit that what we have obtained is a conservative estimate of the value to these people. We have not really valued the negative utilities of drudgery, much of it regarding women. Nor have we attributed any specific gains to the salutary impacts, thus saving of children's time on improved school attendance and on health. There is little dispute that these benefits, in fact, do accrue, but there are issues about quantifying, valuing and estimating the quantum of these benefits. We have perhaps erred on the conservative side in an obvious manner in ignoring the salutary impacts on reduced health expenditure in the face of fairly known consequences of negative health impacts of groundwater with high TDS as well as contaminants such as fluorine. We have chosen to do so since the data on the extent of prevalence of health syndromes arising out of contaminated groundwater and pertaining to the cost of treatment as well as in terms of lost wages were not collected in these areas. Since we have not measured the impacts in terms of reduced drudgery, improved educational performance and avoided health impacts, we believe the above estimates to be conservative.Demographic as well as ecological factors determine the size of these benefits. In the case of IGNP, the benefited areas are dry, with a small population. In fact, the absence of the canal may well have caused a situation that would require depopulating the region. Clearly, the scheme has high benefits in this situation. On the other hand, the benefited areas of the PV scheme, barring highland areas of Vizag, are in the delataic regions with abundant groundwater.Here the benefits are more muted. The chief advantage of the supply of PV scheme water to the Vizag industrial estate is said to be making industrial growth possible in that region. However, we have not attributed any gains from such industrial growth to the scheme since it is possible to argue that the same projects could easily come up in other regions where water is currently available without any net gains to the economy. This argument does not hold for domestic water supply in the case of IGNP as the people already exist out there and face a crunch.An interesting question is how the benefits compare with the cost of creating the structures. The current estimate of creating the whole PV scheme, including the dam on the Godavari River at Pollavaram as well as the rehabilitation and resettlement is about Rs 13,000 crore, or Rs 130 billion. Against this, net economic gains from the industrial and domestic water supply from the canals are estimated by us here at about Rs 0.75 billion per year. This is about half a percent rate of return on an annual basis. It is, of course, a moot point whether one should consider the entire investment for this comparison, or the investment on just the canals, etc. The total package of benefits from the PV Link scheme includes enhanced industrial production, incremental irrigation and revival of irrigation in the Krishna Delta currently facing a water crisis. When viewed in their totality, the gains are not insignificant even for the PV case. The size of these benefits is much more significant in the case of the IGNP project. Here, the IGNP itself is expected to cost around Rs 20 billion and on that the gains from domestic and industrial water supply as estimated by us come to about Rs 6.9 billion. This is quite a sizeable gain and it would appear in retrospect that the scheme should be seen as making sense even if it were not to provide any irrigation benefits! The dominance of gains from domestic and industrial water supply would be a common feature in all regions which face massive distress on account of paucity of drinking water as in the case of Gujarat, Marathwada, Karnataka, etc. An argument can broached that the chief advantage of the IBT schemes proposed under the NRLP lies in reducing the distress for domestic water faced by millions of people living in western and southern India. The question whether this benefit necessarily involves the proposed configuration of irrigation hardware needs to be thought over. In conclusion, we believe that the contribution of this paper lies in its attempt at demonstrating a way of attributing, valuing and estimating benefits which have hitherto been simply written as being incidental advantages of water structures. Annex 1. Details of time and cost of fetching water and potential wage loss in the sampled villages. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2687906050.json b/main/part_2/2687906050.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca62c30ee7f54bd64ca5e26e20922ec5e6036ed9 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2687906050.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9fa8dc85b98b7c00a9d584aa15f96367","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b31ac92d-2764-4ab4-b6ee-1e858faf4362/retrieve","id":"-824953777"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ade4193c-b0aa-4be8-a17f-2c4d203ccbf6","content":"En el lote de producción de semilla, al momento de la cosecha, arranque las planlas sin cortar la parte aérea, examine las . raíces cuidadosamente mediante una escala de evaluación certificada por el ICA. para verificar la presencia de síntomas muy iniciales o avanzados de la enfermedad. \",En caso de no utilizar en forma inmediata los lallos para semilla , almacénelos en u!1 ¡uga! fresco, ,Preferiblemente a la sombra. Cuando los saque para utiUzarlos como semilla, recuerde !lIJe debe cortarlos con machete o herramienlas tratadas limpido (2 U de llillpidol2 Ude agua).en parte de ellas no las utilice: recoléctelas, amontónelas y quémelas.-. .6. En lotes en donde se haya sembrado yuca en ciclos anteMores, se debe permitir el rebrote de /as socas y antes de sembrar nuevamente, destruirtas mediante aplicación de un herbicida translocable que elimina toda6 las partes vegetalivas de la planla, garantizando de esla manera la eliminación de poSibles fuentes de inóculo.7. Fortalecer sislemas de vigilancia filosanitaria y de cuarentena para impedir el ingreso o movilización de material vegetativo procedente de areas ateciadas por la enff'nnedad.Alvarez, E. , Siga estas recomendaciones cosecha tras cose a. Es la manera de mantener libre la zona de esta enferme ad. las ralees (le las plantas enfermas son leñosas, de cfIst:ara gruesa. corchoSa, guebradiza, opaca, fas cuales presentan ~siones en forma de labios que unidas entre si, seme~ red o panal. En estados avanzados de la enferineda0,7 61 I!scIerénquima y parénquima son de coloración mar¡OO. En muchos casos las ralces pueden ser muy delgadas} ti base del tallo muy gruesa. Cuando las raices no tubenzan adecuadamente, los tallos tienden a ser mas ~ae lo normal. En general la parte aérea de las plantas • enféImas se observan mas vigorosas y mejor desafT9lladas que las sanas. En contraste, las ralees de las plantas sanas' se presentan bien desarrolladas, con su cáscara delgada, brillante y flexible aiees de ~ , 1( \"'~\" ~dS por Cue o e Sajlü [¡i: • La enfermedad puede manffeslarse parcialmente afectando sólo algunas plantas, cen raices en diferente estado de se\\leridad. permaneciendo algunas sanas, observándose unas pocas hendiduras caracter j ~llcas . • dispersas o localizadas en cualquier parte de la raiz; parte de éstas • quedan en el suelo al momento del arranque, y se hace difiCIl la selección de mateñal sano. En muchas variedades en el primer ciclo del culUvo, los sinlomas son dificilmente detectados; sin embargo, en la medida en que se utilizan estacas afectadas de un ciclo de siembra a otro, la severidad y la incidencia de raices afectadas por planta se aumenta (CIAT 2006).La enfermedad ~edisemina en forma rápida por el uso de estacas procedentes de plantas enfermas (una planta enferma produce unas 10 estacas para la siembra, al cabo de 5 años se habrán producido unas 10.000 pfantas enfermas a partir de fa planta inicial). Adicionalmente el patógeno tiene ceniO posible vector algunas familias de hemipteros como Cicadeflidae y Delphacidae, conocidas por ten er especies vectores de fitoplasmas respectivamente.Es muy importante tener en cuenta que el mayor riesgo de diseminar la enfennedad está en el uso de materiales de propagación infectados, por tanto el control de la misma se fundamenta en el empleo de estacas procedentes de plantas madres sanas. A rranque lal ~am,s y the use of IIUCh a genotype as male parent may also be responsible for generatedPenistnrJf1c#'aJ characters, somaclonal \\JQTiQJion and evolution in Musa The genetic system proposed by Simmonds 3 does not fully explain how it is possible to recover male fertile somaclonal variants (French ltevcnion) from False Hom cultivars. The hypothesis suggests that Raise Hom plantains could have evolved from French plantains. Thus, it is highly unlikely that dominant mutation(s) should be required for the expression of persistent neutral flowers and male buds. However, the reversion to French bunches from False Hom plantainJ may be due to transposable elements which could have disrupted the function of the dominant gene( s) controlli!]g persistence of male bracts and neutral flowers. The bunches of the plantain cultivar Bise Egome are observed frequently to switch back and forth between False Hom and French (and vice versa). This type of behaviour may indeed be result of mobile transposable elements.Other recessive mutations, e.g. those controlling male sterility, might have also occurred in the evolution from French to False Hom plantains (see Section 2. L 1). Hence, a trend towards sterility (with increasing emphasis upon capacity for vegetative propagation) and the development of fruit parthenocarpy might have been the driving forces in Musa evolution and domestication.Farmers and breeders are mainly interested in traits which have economic importance (either directly or indirectly). Many ofthese traits are influenced by the environment. They are often called evaluation descriptors and are the traits routinely recorded in breeder's trials. Most of them exhibit quantitative variation and may be under polygenic control. For example, number of hands in the inflorescence of euploid F 1 hybrids derived from 3r-2x crosses (Table 2.15) showed a continuous distribution with the lowest values exceeding those of cultivated triploid parent. Moreover, a preliminary genetic analysis, based on the occurrence of transgressive segregation in the diploid F 2, suggests a complex genetic basis of this trait.Analyses of variance (ANOVA) and genetic parameters (such as intradass correlations) are the main tools for determining the extent to which different factors affect quantitative trait variation. A hierarchical (or nested) univariate analysis was applied to data from euploid populations of different poidy levels each of which had been grown in several environments (Table 2.16). This analysis isolated the respective variance components from which it was possible to calculate the intraclass correlations of these segregating populations (Table 2.17).Components of variance Ca2i) and intradass correlations (Pi) for growth and yield parameters were calculated from the plot means of euploid plantainbanana hybrids (Table 2.18). Comparable statistics, using data from both plant and raloon crops, were calculated for the growth and yield parameters of euploid progenies from two further crosses Bobby Tannap X Calcutta 4 and Obino l'Ewai x Calcutta 4 (Table 2.19) . The unequal sample sizes of these populations were taken into account whilst calculating LSD values Cat the 5% level of probability) for each comparison between and within populations.Plant height at flowering, number of hands and fruits, fruit weight and girth, and days to fruit filling were all significantly different between the plant crop and the ratoon crop (Table 2.19). On average, the hybrids took more days to fill their fruit in the plant crop than in the ratoon. In contrast, more hands with fruits of lower weight were obtained in the ratoon than in the plant crop. The shorter fruit filling period may explain why fruits were smaller in the ratoan crop. The plants were also taller in the ratoon than in the plant crop.The genotype-by-environment interaction was significant (P< 0.0 I or P< 0.(01) for bunch weight plus fruit length and girth (Table 2.18). Hence, selection in segregating offspring of bunch and fruit traits may not be reliable if it is based on data solely from the plant crop.The euploid offspring of both French plantain hybrids did not differ significantly for all the quantitative traits evaluated (Table 2.18). Significant differences between ploidy levels within each family (P< 0.00 I) were observed for most tnits (except height of tallest sucker and number of hands and fruits per bunch) (Table 2.11). The tetraploids were taller, had larger production cycles but shorter fruit filling time and heavier bunches than diploids (Table 2.19). The tetraploids 1110 had bigger parthenocarpic fruits but fewer days to fruit filling than the diploids, which have both parthenocarpic and non-parthenocarpic fruits.Simi1arly, there was significant differences (p< 0.001) for almost all traits between clones of the same ploidy level within each family (except days to fruit filling). Hence, individual selection within ~h ploidy will be an effective breeding strategy for the improvement of plantain populations at each ploidy level. The intraclass correlations vllues (Table 1.11) further support the use oflhis a strategy. 3M 2.2.5 Effect of major genes and epistasis in quantitative trait variation Polygenes are often observed to control quantitative trait variation (QTV). However, major genes which are inherited in a Mendelian fashion, may also significantly influence variation in certain quantitative traits. The effect of major genes on QIV can be explained by linkage or pleiotropism and may act in an additive or non-additive manner. The non-additive gene interaction can be either within the locus (e.g. dominance) of be/ween loci (i .e. epistasis).Ploidy and genetic effects in marker loci of segregating euploid plantainbanana hybrids (Table 2.20) were investigated in euploid offspring derived from crosses of triploid French plantains and a wild homozygous diploid banana. The number of copies of the black sigatoka resistance allele (bs j) and of the fruit parthenocarpy gene (P j) in addition to. the ploidy level were all found to significantly affect fiuit weight in euploid plantain-banana hybrids (Figs. 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 respectively).Euploid hybrids from crosses of Obi no I' Ewai and Bobby Tannap with Calcutta 4 were used for analysis of variance of quantitative traits. Based on two segregating markers (Table 2.21) this analysis revealed that the effect of allele substitution (i.e. additive gene action) at both 'bs j and P ] loci significantly affected (P< 0.001) both bunch weight and fiuit size. Likewise, dominance at both loci significantly affected (P< 0 .05 or P< 0.001) fiuit length and circumference, while dominance at the P jlocus significantly affected (p< 005) the number of hands and fruits in both crosses. Intralocus interactions of bs jlocus affected both bunch weight and fiuit traits.There was a significant epistatic interaction (p< 0.05 or P< 0.01) between the additive and non-additive effects (except dominant x dominant) of both bs 1 and P ] loci for plant height, fruit length and circumference. These effects were only observed in the progeny from OL x C4, while no significant interactions were observed in progeny from BI x C4. Plant height was not affected by the segregation of either marker in progeny from BT x C4. However, additive effects of both loci plus intralocus interaction in bs / IIld epistasis significantly affected plant height in OL x C4. This supports the observation that a dw.arfism locus segregates in progeny from BT x C4 . Similarly, the lack of significant effects of both genetic nwlten IIId ploidy on height of tallest sucker supports the theory that .peal dominance in MIIScz is conti oDed by only one single recessive gene with variable expressivity, incomplete peoetIuce IIId genetic specificity (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report).Significant differences between the three ploidy levels (P < 0001) were observed for bunch weight and fiuit size in both families but only for plant height in OL x C4 and only for number offiuits in BT x C4. There was no significant increase or decrease at difference ploidy levels fo~ days to fiuit filling, number of hands in both crosses and for plant height in BT x C4.Most of the genetic variation for plant height, bunch weight and fiuit size (i.e. H2) was accounted for by the gene action of the markers and ploidy level in progeny from OL )( C4. The level of genetic variation accounted for by the defined parameters is measured by the coefficient ofdetennination (R2 in Table l.ll) of the multiple regression model. In contrast, only a small portion of the total variation for bunch weight and fiuit size was explained by these same genetic parameters in progeny from BT x C4.• This suggests that additional loci may be influencing these traits in progeny from BT x C4.Genetic parameters having significant effects in progeny from OL x C4 were included in the best multiple regression model, following a stepwise procedure. Certain genetic parameters, although significant in the analysis of variance, were omitted in the model because they provided redundant infonnation (i.e. they had singular matrices) In cases of redundancy only the parameters with the highest partial coefficient of regression should be considered.The regression models (based on ploidy and genetic effects in the marker bs I and P jloci) explained 80% to 90% of the genetic quantitative trait variation in bunch and fruit traits expressed by progeny from OL x C4 (Table 2.22). The coefficients ofregression suggest that the additive and non-additive effects in the P f locus as well as ploidy account for a significant portion of the variation in fiuit • weight However. intralocus interaction in the P 1 locus accounted for most of the variation in number of hands aQd fruits per bunch. To the authors' knowledge this could be the first report of dissecting quantitative traits in Musa with the aid of conventional genetic markers.The Durbin-Watson analyses of residuals (Table 2.21) were not significant or were inconclusive in the quantitative traits measured. This suggests that marker assisted selected based on both genetic markers may result in significant gains in bunch weight and fruit weight of plantain-banana hybrids. The accumulation of favourable alleles (either dominant (P f) or recessive (bs I) genes) through recurrent selection and the identification/selection of genotypes which are heterozygous at both loci should result in heavy bunches with wide and heavy fiuits. This is likely to be especially effective in polyploid progeny from OL x C4.2.2.6 Genotype-by-environment (GxE) interaction and site rationalization Measurements of GxE interaction are a very important basis for determining the breeding strategy which is most appropriate for the development of genotypes for specific targeted environments. When GxE interactions are not important breeding materials may be safely tested in the most convenient environment. Otherwise, the breeding material must be evaluated in the specific environments where they are expected to be grown by farmers .When the effects of a particular environmental stress are not taken into account, the gains from a selection program may decrease as the level of that stress increases. Mean yields may be relatively high when these genotypes are grown in similarly stressed environments. However, segregating populations characteristically exhibit low genetic variances in stressed environments.Consequently, this type of selected population is likely to produce low mean yields when grown in non-stressed environments. This type of effect can be a,' counted for in terms of the high metabolic 'cost' to plants for expressing additional trails for tolerance or resistance to abiotic or biotic stresses.Selection for tolerance or resistance to stress: The environment plays an important role in the identification of promising genotypes adapted or resistant to specific stresses. For example, selection for increased efficiency of nitrogen uptake shoLJld take place in environments with a low to medium nitrogen content. Only under these conditions will it be possible to observe clear phenotypic differences between genotypes with high and low efficiencies of nitrogen uptake. Optimum environments, where all individuals are phenotypically normal do not allow the differentiation between different genotypes. Genetic differences still exist in this favourable environment but they are difficult to measure and may also be irrelevant. In contrast, the true genetic differences may be masked during growth in extremely poor environments because all the entries tested will have their phenotypes adversely affected by the stress. The ideal environment for breeders selections would be the one which maximises phenotypic differences between genotypes, i.e. where breeders are able to do visual \"genotyping\". Unfortunately, the optimwn selection environment may be slightly different for each s'pecific trait in need of improvement. For example, selection for black sigatoka resistance in plantai' n (based on measuring the youngest leaf spotted) seems to be more efficient during the rainy than in the dry season. This probably relates the optimal conditions for fungal infection which prevail in the rainy season. As shown in Table 2.23 phenotypic differences between resistant and susceptible genotypes can be observed eoually well during the dry season of certain environments. In addition, these results suggest that there was no axE interaction i.e. no change in the ranking of order of magnitude differences, in the host response to black sigatoka when evaluated in different seasons at Nyombe, Cameroon.Location effects on growth and yield parameters: Significant differences between locations were observed for several characters (Table 2.24). There were consistent differences between Onne and Ibadan in both the plant and ratoon crops. At Onne relative to Ibadan, the production cycle was longer, the total number ofleaves was greater, the tallest sucker had greater height and bunch weight, number of hands and total number of fruits per bunch were greater. At Mbalmayo, the growth performance of the plant and ratoon crops was not consistent which made direct effects oflocation less evident. The plant crop was intermediate between Onne and Ibadan in respect of production cycle and height of tallest sucker but had the smallest totatleaf number of the three locations. In the ratoon crop, the production cycle was longer than both Onne and Ibadan but total leaf number and height of tallest sucker were similar to the Onne ratoon crop. Bunch weight was similar to Onne (and therefore greater than lbadan) in the plant crop, and greater than both Onne and Thadan in the ratoon crop. Number of hands per bunch was similar to that of Onne in both crops but fruit number was greater than Onne in the plant crop and less than Onne in the ratoon crop. The superior bunch weight in the ratoon crop at Mbalmayo relative to Onne arose from the greater weight attained by individual fruits. Overall crop performance was poorest at Thadan. This might reflect a limitation of making selections at Onne. Hybrids selected under a high rainfall regime cannot be expected to be well adapted to the longer dry season at Ibadan. The poorer bunch weights of the Ibadan crops were attributable to fewer fruits per bunch and lower weight per individual fruit relative to the other locations. Significant diffllrences were also observed in fruit dimensions. Fruits were longest at Thadan, intennediate at Onne and shortest at Mbalmayo. The reverse applied to girth with friuts having the greatest circumference at Mbalmayo, intermediate at Onne and smallest at Ibadan with no significant axE interaction for this parameter (Table 2.25).Genotype-b.y-enyjronment effects on growth and vield parameters: There were significant differences between entries in different environments for all parameters measured. The analysis of variance for location (L) and genotype (G) indicated that genotype-by-location (GxL) interaction was important, especially for bunch weight, number of hands, number of fingers and fruit weight (P:;: 0.(01) (Table 2.26). Significant interaction effects (P:;: 0.0') were also obselVed for duration of fruit filling, plant height and ftuit length. These resuits indicated the imponance of and the need for multilocational testing of cultivars before release. In contrast to all other parameters the number of days to ftuit filling was not significantly effected by location. Furthermore, combined analysis of variance showed that most of the parameters were not affected by genotype-by-cycle interaction (Gxe) at Onne (Table 2.27) . Parameters such as bunch weight, number of hands, ftuit length and circumference, as well as the growth parameters (plant height, height of tallest sucker and total number of leaves) did not show a significant GxC in this location. These results suggest that at Onne Station, trials do not necessarily need to be spread over several years to enable efficient selection of elite breeding material. The same could be stated for Ibadan, where all of the parameters, except the number of fruits, were unaffected by GxC interaction. In contrast, at Mbalmayo there was a significant GxC interaction for most traits, inferring that it may also be necessary to carry out early selection trials in this location. Hence, we might conclude that there is more need for multilocation trials rather than single site evaluation over several years in the Musa breedirig station of lIT A at Onne. This may apply both to early selection and later evaluation of elite materials.The need to select and evaluate breeding material in all the target environments where new cultivars might be grown by farmers has been clearly warranted above. However, budget constraints will ultimately compromise this ideal situation. Similarly, the identification or development of an environment which allows the optimum expression of all desirable characters, is equally difficult.A remedy to this puzzle is to consider the performance across two environments, as two different but correlated traits. This allows the testing of whether or not selection in one environment may be efficient to develop cultivars adapted to other environments (i.e, correlated response across environments). This calculation is based on the square root of the trait under selection in each environment (i.e. HX and Hy), and the genetic correlation between the two performances (rG). The correlatedresponse to selection (CRy) will be iXHXHyrQC7py, where iX is the intensity of selection in an alternative environment x, and opy is the standard deviation of the trait under selection in the alternative environment x. The direct response to se1ection in the targeted environment Y (Ry) will be iyH2y , while iy is the intensity of selection. Finally, H2y is the heritability of the trait under selection in targeted environment Y The efficiency of selection in alternative environment X may then be measured by the ratio CRyIRy, which is rG(ixHX)/(iyHy) For example, yield potential (t ha-1 year-I) of Musa germplasm (Iandraces and hybrids) was estimated using data from three lIT A stations in the humid forest (Onne and Mbalmayo) and in the transition zone (Ibadan). The genetic parameters of yield potential were calculated as shown in Table 2.28. Based on this, CRy and Ry were found to be 0.80 and 0.89, respectively. These results suggest that selections at Onne will only effectively select genotypes capable of performing well in Mbalmayo. when the intensity of selection at Onne is 10% higher than at Mbalmayo. This would seem considerably easier than establishing a separate site specifically for the selection of genotypes targeted at farmers in the Mbalmayo region. Similarly, selections from Onne or Mbalmayo are not expected to express their potential at Ibadan due to poor correlated responses (0.40 and 0.13 for Onne and Mbalmayo, respectively).Hence, selection in breeding stations even in the same agroecozone (e.g. Onne and MbaImayo in the humid forest) may lead to the development of different cultivars or populations. Indeed, plant breeders should restrict their selection operations to their specific environments. In this regard, clustering of similar environments may assist in making recommendations for cultivar release across similar environments.When improving multiple traits, breeders should locate their selection trials in the environment where they obtain the greatest heritability for all traits, or by independent culling in the optimum environment for each trait. However, when there is distinct priority ranking of traits for improvement, breeders should pursue a tandem selection scheme.BREEDING PLANTAINS AND BANANAS FOR THE HUMID LOWLANDS OF WEST AND CENTRAL AFRICAPlantain breeding has been the primary activity ofPBIP since 1992. This followed significant progress during 1991 which allowed breeding across ploidy, species and subspecies of Muso. In turn, this has made it possible to decentralize and thereby intensify Musa breeding according to different agroecologies and gene pools. However, there remains a need to consider breeding strategies and determine the most efficient methods for improving this little-researched crop for African conditions and constraints. The breeding philosophy ofPBIP was re-detined at the end of 1993 as follows : to develop cultivars with disease and pest resistance that are well suited to the smallholders who produce plantain and banana in compound or home gardens as well as in large fields.Outcrossing Strategy, Seed Production and Euploid HybridsThis permanent activity of the breeding program is to develop elite plantain and banana hybrids at the primary tetraploid and secondary triploid level. The program is also committed to the continuous improvement of back-up popUlations at various ploidy levels.Crosses constituting a complete diallel and two line by tester designs (Table 3.1) were initiated during early 1995. These are focused on improving the diploid plantain back-up population using recurrent selection. Further new crosses were initiated to generate segregating families for genetic analyses and the production of aneuploid stocks (Table 3.2).During 1994, a total of 1,544 bunches of diploid, triploid and tetraploid accessionslcultivars as well as euploid plantain-banana hybrids were pollinated with pollen from diploid, triploid or tetraploid parents. This resulted in the production of more than 33,000 seeds. A breakdown of the pollinations for the most important breeding schemes implemented during 1994 is shown in Table 3.3. A major proportion of the pollination activities focused on the crossing of diploid and tetraploid euploid plantain-banana hybrids. These crosses were again highly successful leading to the generation of a large number of secondary triploids. A similar commitment was made to triploid-diploid crosses involving cultivars of plantain or East African highland banana. However, these crosses continued to suffer from very low seedset.Gametes with the sporophytic chromosome number are known as 2n gametes (incorrectly called \"unreduced\" gametes). Such gametes are the result of modified gametogenesis which is conferred by mutations of meiosis control elements but is also affected by the environment. The evolution of cultivated forms through sexual polyploidization of most species with a polyploid series has relied upon 2n gametes. Hence, breeders of many vegetatively propagated crops have been takingadvantage of the occurrence of2n gametes (especially in the wild relatives) for the production of high yielding polyploids through ploidy manipulations. This technique has been used in alfalfa, blueberry, blackberry, cassava, peanut, potato, strawberry, sugarcane and sweetpotato. In Musa, 2n eggs opened the path for the genetic amelioration of bananas and plantains.The pro luetion of 2n pollen (characterized by a pollen grain diameter of> 120~) has been observed in accessions of different ploidy level of both wild and cultivated Musa germplasm (Table 3.4). Thus far, all M balbisiana accessions investigated did not have 2n pollen production. All genotypes which were observed to produce 2n pollen also had parthenocarpic fruits. This suggests that 2n pollen production may be a character which evolved late in the domestication of cultivated Musa . The frequency of genotypes producing 2n pollen was 22% in diploid M acuminata, 56% in AAA, 20% in ABB, 12.5% in AAB. The higher frequency of2n pollen producers in AAA relative toM. acuminata suggests that \"conventional polyploid evolution\" through sexual polyploidization has occurred in bananas.Segregation for 2n pollen production in diploid plantain-banana hybrids (Table 3.5) suggests that one locus may be involved in the inheritance of2n pollen production in Muso. Although meiotic mutants are normally recessive, data from segregating Muso offspring suggest that it is the dominant allele in diploid hybrids which is required for 2n pollen production (non-2n: 2n pollen producers fit a 2: I ratio, 7.. 2 = 0.13, NS). The plantain parents Bobby Tannap and Obino I' Ewai, which may have the same genotype at the locus controlling 2n pollen production, are simplex for this locus. This means that had they been male fertile these genotypes would have produced 2n pollen. Segregation data for 2n pollen production in tetraploid hybrids support a simplex genotype for this locus in both plantain parents (non-2n: 2n pollen producers fit a 1: 1 ratio, 7.. 2 = 1.79, NS). The proposed genotypes are based on the assumption of pairing and first division segregation in the chromosome of the heterozygous A genome while the B genome chromosome has the recessive allele. Calcutta 4, the diploid banana parent does not produce 2n pollen and should have a homozygous recessive genotype for the locus controlling 2n pollen production. If this were not the case, non-2n pollen production would be observed in the offspring derived from crosses between French plantains and Calcutta 4.The frequency of the dominant allele for 2n pollen production in diploid M. acuminata was 0.12 while the frequency of this allele was 0.33 in AAA. The higher gene frequency at the triploid level is possibly due to triploid cultivars having arisen through unilateral sexual polyploidization between diploid parents producing n and 2n gametes. Hence, those banana cultivars producing 2n pollen could be at least simplex for the locus controlling this trait.During the 1994 planting season, 248 clonal seedlings were screened in the nursery before field establishment (Table 3.6). Only 127 new hybrids (or 51%) were planted in the EET -94 . The low number reflects the transition to the new breeding schemes and parental material which took place during the previous year (see PBIP 1993 Annual Report).Early Evaluation Trials (EET) 3 J . 1 Field procedure Newly generated hybrids are initially evaluated in small plots (1-5 plants in an unreplicated trial) for black sigatoka resistance (BSR), large pendulous bunch and large fruit size, parthenocarpic fruit development, improved ratooning and dwarfism. The early evaluation takes place at OMC Station and involves observations of several hundred hybrids each year. Segregation after selfing and in crosses with testers of known genotype revealed that TMP2x 1.297-2 (= French Reversion x Calcutta 4) and Galeo were heterozygous for the P J locus. Field observations of segregating material showed that clones with erect bunches often have non-parthenocarpic fruits. This may be due to pleiotropism or genetic linkage between loci controlling bunch orientation and fruit parthenocarpy. Segregation was also observed between full-sib offspring for host response to field infection by virus( es). This may suggest that there is potential for the genetic improvement and development of virus resistant germplasm in Musa through conventional cross-breeding (see Section 5.7) Thus rar only one hybrid clone with acceptable agronomic traits has been selected from progeny of a backcross between a primary tetraploid and its wild banana parent Calcutta-4. This secondary triploid was obtained after backcrossing TMPx 548-9 to Calcutta 4. This hybrid has light orange coloured fruit pulp, suggesting that the white colour of fruit flesh in bananas could be controlled by recessive gene(s).During 1994, PBlP continued to identify combining ability groups in order to maximize heterosis during the production of secondary triploids. Crosses between fuU-sibs and half-sibs produced very weak offspring due to inbreeding depression. This was the case even when high yielding selected clones were used as parental genotypes (e.g. TMPx 6930-1 x TMP2x 1549-5 or TMPx 548-4 x 1586-2).However, crosses between selected tetraploid hybrids and unrelated diploids accessions were sometimes successful in generating hybrid vigour (e.g. TMPx 4479-1 x SH-3362 or TMPx 2637-49 x SH-3362). However, this was unpredictable with an equal number of such crosses failing to generate interesting progeny (TMPx 548-9 x Pi sang lilin, TMPx 4479-1 x Galee, TMPx 548-4 x Galeo). This suggests that breeding schemes should consider specific combining ability during the choice of parental genotypes.The heterotic group ((African 'French' plantains x Calcutta 4) x improved banana diploids ofFHIA {Fundacion Hondurena de Investigacion Agricola} 1 may be useful for further production of secondary triploids with heavy bunches and mUltiple sources of black sigatoka resistance. However, the taste and appearance of fruit from these pi antain hybrids may be affected by the fruit quality genes donated by the diploid banana germplasm produced by FIllA (see Section 7).The cross between TMP2x 2829-62 and Pisang lilin generated interesting offspring combining black sigatoka resistance from at least three sources together with adequate agronomic quality. This cross may be useful for further improvement of the diploid back-up population and for mapping of fruit parthenocarpy loci. In contrast, poor offspring were generated from the cross between 2143 and SH-3362.Preliminary Yield Trials (PYT) and Selection of Euploid HybridsHybrids which combine increased black sigatoka resistance with good bunch qualities are selected for further evaluated in replicated trials at Onne (PYT: two replicates of at least four plants each). All traits which were assessed in EET are again evaluated in the PYT. In addition at this stage, it is now realistic to evaluate earliness, resistance to natural infection by other pest/diseases, fruit quality/palatability and postharvest storage ability. Each PYT consists of25-30 entries.Plantain and banana hybrids combining desirable attributes (e.g. black sigatoka (B S) resistance and heavy bunches with large fruits) have been selected in EETs grown under aIley cropping (AC) conditions using \"live mulch\"provided by Flemingia congesta. Results from multilocational testing suggest tnat some of the plantain hybrids as well as some of the parental landraces may not achi eve high yields under low input c.g. low levels of soil organic matter; or environmental stress such as drought. Hence, the purpose of this experiment was twofold: (i) to compare the yield potential of newly selected hybrids with that of advanced selected hybrids and plantain and banana landraces and (ii) to compare the performance of all these genotypes under resouce poor conditions (i. e. monocropping without additional mulching).Twenty-five entries were planted in the rainy season of 1993, according to a square lattice design with two replications. Each replication consisted of five incomplete blocks, with five plants per clone in each block. All experimental plots were surrounded by borders of black sigatoka susceptible cultivars (either the plantain landrace Agbagba or the dessert Cavendish banana Valery). Data were collected from the plant crop between early 1994 and early 1995.The experimental site was left to fallow for about two years prior to planting and was prepared for planting with minimum disturbance by manual clearing (but no burning). To minimize the adverse effects ofland clearing, a leguminous crop (Pueraria phase%ides) was planted when the fallow commenced.The plantain hybrid 4424-4 was eliminated before flowering due to the presence of stunted growth and virus-like symptoms in all seedlings. All plants of the selected hybrid TMPx 6930-1 showed abnormal bunch phenotype, which may be due to somaclonal variation arising from in vitro multiplication. Similarly, some plants of the banana hybrid TMBx 612-74 which had been multiplied from PBIP's in vi/ro stocks also showed abnormal phenotype (drooping leaves and light bunch). However, plants multiplied from the TMBx 612-74 tissue culture stocks provided by INIBAP's Transit Centre (TC) at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL) resembled the true-to-type.The host response to BS of each genotype was compared in tenns of the index of non-spotted leaves (INSL). This index was calculated from data collected at flowering (Table 3.8) using the equation lNSL = 100 x [(NSL -YLS + I )lNSL],where YLS is the youngest leaf spotted due to BS and NSL is the number of standing leaves. Among the advanced selected hybrids, TMBx 612-74 had the highest level ofBS resistance, which supports previous reports from muItilocationai trials. For most of the registered hybrids, at least two thirds of the standing leaves were not showing advance stages ofBS disease at flowering . These hybrids were TMPx 548-4, TMPx 548-9, TMPx 582-4, TMPx 1112-1, TMPx 2637-49, TMPx 2796-5, TMPx 4479-1 and TMPx 5706. In contrast, the plantain landraces had up to two thirds of their leaves showing necrotic spots due to BS (Table 3.8). New advanced selections such as TMBx 5295-1 , TMPx 7152-2, TMPx 7356-1 had an INSL ~ 75%, with TMPx 7152-2 having the highest INSL in the plant crop of this preliminary yield trial (Table 3.8).Most of the plantain hybrids had shorter plant height at flowering than the medium sized plantain landraces Agbagba and Obino I' Ewai (Table 3.8). TMPx 582-4 and TMPx 7i 52-2, were selected in EETs and characterized as semi-dwarf and small French plantain hybrids, respectively. These hybrids flowered significantly earlier than the French plantain landrace Bobby Tannap, which is the three quarters medium semi-dwarf parental cuItivar ofTMPx 582-4 (Table 3.8).TMPx 548-9 and TMPx 2796-5 were the clones with the heaviest bunch weights in the plant crop of this preliminary yield trial (Table 3.8). This supports the previous report that TMPx 2796-5 had stable heavy bunches throughout the multilocational trials (see Section 3.5.2). Similarly , the above average bunch weight of Obi no I' Ewai (the landrace with the heaviest bunch in this trial) supports the report that this landrace had stable average yields in multilocational trials (see Section 3.5.2).TMPx 548-9 and TMPx 2796-5 out yielded Obino I' Ewai as a consequence of having more fruits (rather than a larger fruit size) than the plantain landrace (Table 3.8).TMBx 5295-1 (a starchy banana hybrid, derived ITom the AAB cultivar Laknau) had a significantly heavier bunch weight than both Obino I' Ewai and the starchy AAB banana landrace Pisang Kelat (Table 3.8). The higher bunch weight ofTMBx 5295-1 was a consequence of having a significantly greater fruit length than Obino I' Ewai (Table 3.8). TMBx 612-74 (a cooking banana hybrid of the ABB landrace Bluggoe) had a significantly higher bunch weight than the ABB landrace Cardaba. The relatively low yield of Cardaba in this monocropping field with low organic matter input might be expected since this landrace will only produce heavy bunches in \"rich\" environments (see Section 3.5.2). However, this is a notable achievement as Cardaba is currently the best performing black sigatoka resistant cooking banana which has been extensively distributed in Nigeria as a potential substitute of plantains.The results from the plant crop of this preliminary yield trial suggest that some hybrids, especially those with stable yields, may out yield the most productive land race even under low input conditions. However, some other selected BS resistant hybrids (e.g. TMPx 548-4 or TMPx 1112-1) had low bunch weights (not signiflcantly different from Obino l'Ewai) These same hybrids were reported to have unstable yields in multilocational trials. This clearly demonstrates the importance of considering genotype-by-cropping system interaction during the selection of improved Mllsa germplasm. Results from the Tatoon crop are required to confirm this prelim inary assessment.Triploid parent-tetraploid offsprini regressions for QUantitative traits The calculation of parent-ofT~pring regressions allows an estitnate of the narrow-sense heritability (h 2 ) This analysis was used to determine whether or not selection of triploid parents (for the production of primary tetraploid hybrids) could reliably be based on phenotypic assessment (Table 3.9). Analysis of h 2 in polyploids producing 2n gametes does not only consider additive gene action (as in diploids) but also non-additive gene interactions (e.g. dominance intralocus interactions and epistasis) .The coefficient of determination values (R2) for total number ofleaves, height of tallest sucker at harvest, days to fruit filling and fruit circumference are listed in Table 3.9. The R2 values indicate that most of the variation for all these traits in the tetraploid offspring can be accounted for by the phenotype of the triploid parent. Likewise. total number ofleaves (a key taxonomic trait) and days to fruit filling had high h 2 (0.80 and 0.78, respectively) indicating that most of the genetic variation was due to additive gene action.Although, days to flowering had high h 2 (0.80), only 19\"10 of the total variation was explained by the phenotype of the triploid parent. This may suggest that h 2 was inflated by the nonadditive genetic interaction controlling days to flowering in Musa . Plant height, bunch weight and number of fruits and fruit length had intermediate to low h 2 (0.20-0 .55). Indeed, most of the variation in these characters in the tetraploid offspring could not be predicted using the phenotype of the triploid parent (R2 ranges from 3% to 38%). Therefore, progeny testing is required to assess and select the best parents for population improvement of some the most important agronomic traits (e.g. plant height and heavy bunches with many big fruits) . In contrast, fruit weight and circumference (which have intermediate h 2 of about 0.50) may be predicted on the basis of tile triploid parental phenotype (R2 > 60%). Thus, phenotypic recurrent selection may be useful for population improvement for heavy fruits with large girth.Finally, height of tallest sucker had a significant intermediate h 2 (0.39).This supports the report that apical dominance may be controlled by a single recessive gene in Musa germplasm (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report). From this original observation a phenotypic recurrent selection scheme was initiated for the improvement of suckering behaviour in plantain-banana breeding populations (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report) . We can now report that two thirds of the phenotypic variation of the progeny can be explained by the phenotype of the cultivated triploid parent. This data strong supports the proposed breeding scheme.Thirty entries were planted in a rectangular simple lattice design with two replications each of six incomplete blocks (Fig. 3.1). Each incomplete block had five plots of five plants. All experimental plots were surrounded by borders of a black sigatoka susceptible check. This trial compares secondary tetraploids and triploids (selected in EET -92) with their parents and grandparents. The 1994 PYT also included a new primary tetraploid plantain hybrid (selected in EET -92), advanced selected primary tetraploid cooking banana hybrids and triploid cultivars.New banana and plantain selections such as TMBx 5295-1, TMPx 7152-2 and TMPx 7356-1 had similar or higher yields than the plantain landrace Obino I' Ewai when grown under the low input conditions of 1993 PVT. However, the short cycle of the plantain hybrids is still likely to result in higher yield potential per unit time than that of the land race through successive ratooning. TMPx 5295-1 and TMPx 7152-2 will be advanced for further testing in multilocational trials (see Section 3.5.4).Multilocational Evaluation Trials (MET) in West and Central AfricaThe black sigatoka resistant tetraploid hybrids which expressed all of the most desirable traits in PYT are included in Multilocational Evaluation Trials. The MET is carried out in a minimum of three different locations using two replications in lattices or randomized complete block designs (ReBD). The number of enries is from 18 t036 genotypes (hybrids and landraces) which are tested with five plants per genotype in each replication. Hybrids from other breeding programs can also be evaluated in METs for direct comparisons with I1TA hybrids (pYT selections)These materials are introduced in collaboration with the relevant breeding programs.The main objective of the MET is to test the performance of the resistant hybrids under a wide range of agroecological conditions in sub-Saharan Mrica. In this way it is possible to assess the genotype-by-environment interaction for specific traits and the stability of both yield and BSR ofthe banana and plantain tetraploid hybrids.The involvement of key NARS in this relatively early stage of hybrid evaluation is an important source of feedback which greatly enhances the selection procedures for Musa breeding at lIT A. The MET also allows lIT A's breeders to decide what material can be further evaluated by NARS in the target area.As applies to all mandate crops, lIT A follows international regulations and governmental laws for the safe distribution of Musa germplasm. The Nigerian Plant Quarantine Service authorize the export of axenic Musa tissue culture material after checking lIT A's mother explants. Each cooperator supplies the appropriate import permit issued by the quarantine authority of their country. In addition, it is realized that no quarantine measures can be 100% effective. For this reason cooperators are informed that they must follow strict post-quarantine measures.These include the constant scrutiny of plants during establishment in the greenhouse nursery and in the field and throughout the duration of the trial. Should any plants exhibit abnormal growth or virus-like symptoms, they are advised to destroy these materials. This information was given to national programs in twelve countries in Africa, tropical America and Australia. N ARS are keen to evaluate newly developed hybrids, especially because of their disease/pest resistance and high yields. They consider that the potential benefits justifY introduction of tissue culture materials and the associated procedures. The data indicate significant differences in growth cycle (Tables 3.11-3.13). total number ofleaves (Table 3.14) and plant height (Table 3.15). The genotype-by-environment interaction (= location x production cycle) significantly affected all components of yield (Tables 3.16-3.22) and fruit traits except fruit circumference .The hybrids were generally shorter than their plantain parents (Table 3.15)and had larger bunch weights (Table 3.17). Shorter plants tended to have a smaller number of leaves. The product ion of heavier bunches is likely to be due to the higher fruit weight (Table 3.22) and larger number offruits (Table 3.19).However, there was a smaller number of hands in the hybrids than in their plantain parents (Table 3.18) The hybrids showed a shorter growth cycle (Table 3.11), with fewer days to flowering (Table 3.12) but a longer fruit filling period (Table 3.13), in comparison with their plantain parents.F or the two humid forest stations (Onne and Mbalmayo) we could consider TMPx 1658-4 and TMPx 2796-5 as high and stable yielding clones based on their bunch weights (Table 3.17) In the moist savanna-forest transition zone (Ibadan) these two hybrids were still high yielding in comparison with the other clones (Table 3.23).Yield stahilily: homeostasis and response /0 environmental change Several methods have been proposed for the statistical analysis of GxE and the determination of the phenotypic response to environmental change (Table 3.24) . The simplest method of testing the response of entries across • environments (locations, years, and seasons) is the combined analysis of variance (ANOV A). This analysis provides means not only to determine when and where to do multilocational testing but also how to allocate resources for proper testing of breeding material.The stability model used to describe the performance of a clone across a series of environments for bunch weight (BW) and yield potential (YLD) in MET-I was:[ y .. = II ' + fl• I' +/i\"]where Y ij is the mean of the i th clone at the jth environment (= location x cycle), ~i is the mean for the i lh clone over all environments, Pi is the regression coefficient that measures the response of the i lh clone to varying environments, 0ijis the deviation from regression of the i th clone at the jth environment, and Ij is the environmental index. Ij was defined as the mean of all clones at the jth environment minus the grand mean:[Ij = (~Yii'C) -(HYijlce)], ~Ij = 0 where s e 2 /r was the estimate of the pooled error or the variance of a clone mean at the jth environment and L IV = [LYi/ -Yi2/e] -(LYij Ij)2/l:It The genotype by environment interaction can be partitioned in two parts, i.e. the variation due to the response of the cultivar to varying environmental indexes, and the unexplainable deviations from the regression on the environmental index (Table 3.25). The regression coefficient (which is one of the stability parameters) was estimated as:(refer Tables 3.26 and 3.27 for BW and YLD respectively).A stable genotype performs comparably in different environments and should have a regression coefficient (b) equal to I and a very small deviation from the regression model, i.e. Sd? = 0 To test the hypothesis that there were no differences in the regression coefficients among the clones (i .e. Ho: b J = b 2 = .. = be>, the F-test MS Z IMS 3 was used .The stability analysis of MET-l considered only the 16 polyploid clones (c) grown in 6 environments (e) and had a complete randomized block design with two replications (r). Stability analysis was performed for bunch weight (BW, kg plant-I) and yield potential (YLD, MT ha-I year I). The F -test for equal regression coefficients among entries was significant at the 0 I % level for BW as well as for YLD. This indicates that the linear model is an acceptable representation of the data. For both bunch weight and yield potential the F-test for differences in environments was significant (P< 0.001). Since the sum of squares (SS) for c1ones-by-environment (linear) was greater than the SS pooled deviations, most attention should focus on the stability parameter b for BW and YLD.Moreover, the pooled deviations were not statistically significant. Hence, the linear models for BW are a good representation of the genotypic response to varying environments, with the exception oftOOse genotypes (TMPx 2796-5, TMPx 1112-S6 I, Bluggoe and Cardaba) which exhibited a significant departure from the model (Table 3.26). Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (R2) was low for the linear models of these four entries. This indicates that the linear regression models accounted for most of the variation in BW across environments. A similar interpretation can be made for YLO.Homeostasis: The identification of high and stable yielding cultivars and hybrids was possible by plotting yield potential (YLO, MT ha-I year-I) against the coefficient of variation (CV) (Fig. 3.2). The CV was considered a measurement of static stability i.e. homeostasis. It measures the dispersion of the dataset where smaller CV values reflect data more closely clustered around the mean. A similar analysis was carried out for bunch weight (Fig. 3.3).Cardaba and Bluggoe had high stable yields and stable heavy bunches.The results support the activity ofIlTA, in cooperation with NARS, to distribute Cardaba to farmers in southeastern Nigeria since 1988 . However, Bluggoe'may have the disadvantage of being severely affected by cigar end rot in regions where this disease is prevalent.TMPx 1658-4 and TMPx 2796-5 had high stable yields with stable high bunch weights. These hybrids are derived from crosses between plantain landraces and the parthenocarpic banana Pisang lilin. In contrast, TMPx 548-4 had high but unstable yields although it had stable heavy bunches. A short growth cycle for the ratoon crop (Table 3.3) may have influenced its perceived unstable yield potential. The very long growth cycle of Fougamou and Pelipita may be responsible for their position in the group of 10w unstable yielders' with unstable heavy bunches.The plantain cultivars (Agbagba, Obino l'Ewai and Bobby Tannap) in the lower left sector of the graphs (Figs. 3.2 and 3.3) showed stable but low to medium yields. Their yield stability was not unexpected since these plantain cultivars are widely distributed across West and Central Africa. Low yields could be due to their susceptibility to black sigatoka leaf spot disease which was introduced to the region after the spread of this germplasm across Africa.Genotypic responses to environmental changes: Interpretations of stability might differ when a more dynamic concept of stability is considered. Yield potential and bunch weight were plotted against the stability parameter 'b' (Figs. 3.4 and 3.5,respectively). TID parameter (i.e. coefficient of regression) measures the genotypic response to environmental change. Clones are considered stable when their 'b' value is close to unity (I) . In contrast to the coefficient of variation, parameter 'b' is a dynamic concept because change across environments may occur as long as it is linear. Bluggoe and TMPx 1658-4 are always found to be top yielders (lower right part of Fig. 3.4). Bluggoe achieved a stable high yield potential by producing stable heavy bunches, while TMPx 1658-4 had stable high yields due to its stable growth cycle (Table 3.11). TMPx 548-9 belongs to the group of top yielders only when grown in 'rich' environments, because it can only produce heavy bunches in such environments. TMPx 548-4 belongs to the same group but its short growth cycle causes it to have a high but variable yield potential. Pelipita . only produces heavy bunches in 'rich' environments, which explains its unpredictable yields. The plantain cultivars and Valery are considered to be 'always low yielders' with small to medium sized bunches possibly due to their high susceptibility to black sigatoka disease. Similarly, low yields were observed in the black sigatoka susceptible but early maturing hybrid 597-4. Genotypic responses to environmental change are shown in Fip. 3.6 to 3.9.From an evolutionary viewpoint these results suggested that wide adaptation was achieved by some banana and plantain cuItivars but these became low yielders when affected by black sigatoka disease. Hence, the Musa breeding programs should aim to develop black sigatoka resistant cultivars with stable high yields by using plantain or banana landraces as female parents. In this respect, plantain hybrids (e.g. TMPx 2796-5 and TMPx 1658-4) derived from an edible parthenocarpic cultivated diploid banana (e.g. Pisang Iilin) show high and stable yields. This may suggest that during domestication of the crop there was human or artificial selection for both fruit parthenocarpy (edible fruits) and stable productivity. If these two characters are closely linked, Musa breeders should increase the frequency of the fruit parthenocarpy alleles in order to develop stable productivity in their breeding populations.Genotype-by-environment (GleE) effects for bunch weight (BW, kg plant-}) and yield potential (YLD, MT ha-l year}) of genotypes harvested in the six environments of MET -I are shown in Tables 3.18 and 3.19 respectively. These interaction values were estimated by: entries in each environment. Some genotypes showed significant GxE effects for both bunch weight and yield potential in a specific environment (TMPx 2796-5 and TMPx 1112-1 in Onne ratoon crop (RC), TMPx 1658-4 in Thadan RC and Cardaba in Mbalmayo RC). Significant GxE interaction was exhibited by most of the entries for yield potential (Table 3.29). Onne plant crop (PC) did not interact with any of the genotypes for yield potential and exceptionally with TMPx 1658-4 for bunch weight (Table 3.28).Principal component analyses (PCA) were performed for each genotypeby-environment matrix. The resulting 'interaction PCA scores' (IPCA) for genotypes and environments were used to construct the AMMI biplots ). These IPCA scores have the units of the square root of either BW (kg plant-I) or YLD (MT ha-I year-I). In these plots environments are represented by open symbols and genotypes with closed symbols. AMMI-I for bunch weight (Fig. 3.10) shows the genotype and environment main effects on the abscissa, and the IPCA genotype and environment scores on the ordinate. The vertical line indicates the bunch weight grand mean (~) while the horizontal line indicates zero IPCA score. Displacements along the abscissa indicate differences in main (additive) effects, while displacements along the ordinate show differences in interaction effects.Bobby Tannap and 597-4 differed only in main effects, whereas Bobby Tarmap and its tetraploid offspring TMPx 582-4 differed only in interaction effects. The hybrids 597-4 and TMPx 582-4 differed in both main effects and interact!on patterns. IPCA-l explained 46% of the interaction variance for bunch weight. The black sigatoka susceptible tetraploid hybrid 597 -4 had the lowest mean across environments, which supports the decision not to select this hybrid as a TMPx. Ibadan PC and RC had low bunch weights which may be an indication of the lack of adaptation of entries to the longer dry season in this location. Heavy bunches were harvested in Onne with the PC and RC having a similar pattern of interaction effects. Obino l'Ewai could be considered as an average yielding stable clone, since it was found close to the centre of the plot. Fig. 3.11 presents the IPCA-1 for bunch weight on the abscisa and IPCA-2 for bunch weight on the ordinate. The two IPCA axes (AMMI-2) account for 73% of the GxE interaction for bunch weight (Le. 2~1e more than the AMMI-l). In the AMMl-2 biplot graph (Fi .. 3.11). pointa near the origin (e.g. Obino I' Ewai) have little interaction. These point. cIoMly fit the additive part of tile model. Points near each other (e.g. TMPx 1112-1 and TMPx 2796-5) have similar interaction patterns (Table 3.21). Conversely. poinII clip_ from each other (e.g. TMPx 2796-5 and 597-4) have completely different values for the interaction effects (Table 3.211).The AMMI-l and AMMI-2 biplots were also constructed for yield potential (Figs. 3.11 and 3.13,respectively). Based on the AMMI-l biplot (Fig. 3.11), Bluggoe and TMPx 582-4 could be considered stable and average yielding clones. Bobby Tannap and Obino l'Ewai are very close to each other, indicating that they have similar geno~ means and interaction effects (Table 3.29). Based on the AMMI-2 biplot (Fig. 3.13), TMPx 582-4 may have stable average yield potential in Mbalmayo, while Bluggoe may have relatively high yield potential at Ibadan. For yield potential the IPCA-l accounted for up to 63% of the interaction effects, while the IPCA-2 accounted for another 20%. Thus, the AMMI-2 accounted for 83% of the GxE interaction for yield potential.The ~T -2 was planted in 1992 to test twelve promising hybrids in several locations across sub-Saharan Africa (Table 3.10). A total of 13 NARS in Ghana, Nigeria and Cameroon were involved in this multisite trial, which aimed to determine the production stability and the adoption of hybrids across the different environments of these plantain and banana producing countries.There were significant differences for all traits in both the plant and Tatoon crops at Onne (Tables 3.30 to 3.33), the plant crop at Mbalmayo (Table 3.31) and in the plant crop at Bori (except number of hands) (Table 3.32). Bunch and fruit data from the ratoon crop at Mbalmayo (Table 3.34) should be assessed with caution because plot means were based on few plants. This arose because some plants were lost due to wind damage while others were rogued because they exhibited virus-like symptoms. Furthermore, only approximate values for the least significant differences (Tables 3.30 to 3.33) could be calculated due to the unequal number of plants in each replication from which it was possible to collect data.This section presents the preliminary results of bunch weights in the second set ofmultilocational trials ~T-2). A comprehensive report of the host response to black sigatoka across Afiican environments is reported in Section 5.2.The' best hybrids, based on their consistently heavier bllncllCl u compared to the Iocallandraces, were the black sigatoka resi~.nt TMPx 2637 .... 9,• TMPx 2796-5, TMPx 4698-1, TMPx 5511-2 and TMPx 6930-1 (Table 3,35) Preliminary assessment of consumer acceptability suggests that most hybrids may be adopted by the indigenous population of southeastern Nigeria and southern Cameroon (see Section 7.4). The widespread high performance ofTMPx 2796-5 suppons the repon that this hybrid had a stable high bunch weight in the MET-I (see Section 3.5.2) . Selections from the cross Obino I' Ewai x Calcutta 4 (e.g. TMPx 2637-49, TMPx 4698-1, TMPx 5511-2 and TMPx 6930-1) were again among the highest yielders in the MET -2. This cross has the potential to generate diverse but stable high yielding hybrids for further advanced testing and subsequent cultivar release by NARS.These results indicate that the breeding strategies adopted by liT A are highly efficient Indeed, all selected hybrids tested in MET -2 and the two best . cooking banana introductions (Bluggoe and Cardaba) outyielded the local plantain landraces (Agbagba, Bobby Tannap and Obino I' Ewai) in one or more environments. Moreover, based on the initial reactions offarmers, the Govemmeilt of Rivers State (Nigeria) officially released Cardaba as a new cultivar in 1992. This demonstrates that Musa breeding methods, either through introduction of exotic germplasm or hybridization, are able to provide disease resistant high yielding alternatives for the traditional production systems in the lowland humid forests of Nigeria and Cameroon.Every year new materials are introduced by the Centre Regional Bananiers et Plantains (CRBP) in Cameroon. CRBP has evaluated at Nyombe the MET-2 genotypes and hybrids from their own and other breeding programs (CIRAD-FLHOR and FHIA) as well as new introduction from Papua New Guinea. Evaluation focused on the assessment ofimportant agronomic traits and resistance to black sigatoka.The lIT A hybrids expressed a good partial resistance to black sigatoka. However, many of these hybrids had individuals exhibiting virus-like symptorm. Following confirmation through INIBAP, all hybrids except TMBx 612-74 (from the cross between Bluggoe and Calcutta 4) were rogued.TMBx 612-74 produced a 20 kg bunch with seven hands from the first cycle. This was similar to the first and second cycle yield ofFInA I and FHIA 2. lITA and FHlA hybrids are being multiplied for more intensive testing. The CIRAD-FLHOR hybrid IRFA 904 showed a good agronomic perfonnance but produced seed due to a high level offerna\\e fertility. (The information for the above sub-section was taken from eRBP 1994 Annual Report).The Crops Research Institute (CR!, Kumasi, Ghana) started multilocational testing of improved Musa germplasm (MET -2) provided by lIT A in 1992. Tissue culture plantlets of 19 plantain and banana hybrids and selected Musa clones were provided by PBIP in April 1992. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with two replications each of five plants. The following quantities of fertilizer were provided to each plant: 76 g of sulphate of ammonia, 40 g of single superphosphate and 13 g of muriate of potash. Nematodes and plantain weevil were controlled by the application of Furadan. This was applied three times at the rate of 4.5 g per plant (one month after planting and at two monthly intervals thereafter). Ring weeding was carried out around each stand while weeds between rows were slashed and used as mulch at regular intervals.Assessment of growth parameters and severity of black sigatoka commenced three months after planting. All the Calcutta 4 plants flowered within six months. One plant ofTMPx 2481 and one plant ofTMPx 582-4 were rogued because virus symptoms were observed. One plant ofTMPx 1621-1, which had cigar end rot was also rogued.Five hybrids were selected for further evaluation on the basis of their performance. Selection criteria included low black sigatoka infection score, high bunch weight and excellent or good food fruit quality for Ampesi and Fufu. The selected hybrids were TMPx 548-9, TMPx 2796-5, TMPx 6930-1 , TMPx 582-4 and TMBx 612-74. (Information provided by Dr. O.B. Hemeng. e RI, Kumasi, GhalUl).We expect to receive further information from our NARS partners (from advanced Musa yield trials) to increase the accuracy of our recommendations concerning the utilization of either plantain hybrids or cooking bananas in specific targeted agroecozones (see Section 3.6).Restriction on movement of Musa germpJasm from lIT A to N ARS commenced at the end of 1993 and will continue until virus-tested tissue culture stocks are available. Plants derived from these stocks will be observed under optimum conditions for virus replication and symptom expression. If all plants from a specific stock continue to appear healthy and test negative for the presence of viruses over a prolonged period, these stocks will then be used as the basis of subsequent multiplication for distribution.Meanwhile, IIT A will continue with multilocational trials in its stations at Abuja, lbadan, Onne (Nigeria), Mbalrnayo (Cameroon) and at ESARC (Namulonge, Uganda). This continued activity can be warranted by the high level of control and phytosanitation which is possible at IIT A stations.The objectives of MET -3 are to test the most promising Musa genotypes in a wide range of environmeilts in four major African agroecozones (West African humid forest, forest-savanna transition, and southern Guinea savanna, and the East African mid-altitudes). At Onne the genotypes will be tested under alley-cropping and monocropping. At Namulonge, all entries will be grown in plots infested with nematodes and plots treated with nematicide. Accessions will also be scored for damage caused ~y other pests and diseases such as banana weevil, banana viruses, black sigatoka (across all environments) and Fusarium wilt (only in East Africa).Other important agronomic descriptors will also be evaluated including days to flowering, plant height, number of standing leaves at flowering, days for fruit filling, height of tallest sucker at harvest, bunch weight, number of hands and fruits per bunch, fruit weight, length and girth.The entries to be tested in are African plantain landraces, exotic Asian cooking bananas, dessert bananas grown worldwide, a Brazilian natural tetraploid hybrid and elite artificial hybrids from four of the most active breeding programs in the world: EMBRAPA (Brazil), FHIA (Honduras), INIVIT/fNIFAT (Cuba) and UTA. The Brazilian selections might withstand drought because they were selected in Cruz das Almas (12°40'19\"8, 3~06'22\"W, 220 mamsl). This location, situated on a part of the great continental elevated plain, has an annual mean rainfall of 1224 mm, an annual mean temperature of 23 .SoC and air relative humidity about SO%.The MET -3 may be considered as an African-Asian-Latin American partnership, sponsored by IlT A, for the benefit of the African smallholder. We acknowledge the cooperation ofINffiAP to obtain virus indexed stocks of some entries included in this trial (see details in Table 3.36)Advanced Musa Yield Trials (AMYT)The Advan~cd Musa Yield Trials (AMYT) consist of eight of the most promising liT A hybrids (either PIT A •for plantains, or BIT A -for bananas) along with the cooking banana hybrid FHIA-l and local cultivars used as checks. This is being undertaken by eight countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Thus, the results of these wide-ranging trials may be of regional relevance.The objective of the AMYT is to identify elite genotypes for potential release as new cultivars by NARS according to the specific needs and regulations in each country. AMYT evaluates previously selected promising hybrids over a period of at least two production cycles in a RCBD with four replicates each of five plants. Criteria for selection include disease resistance and productivity, but also local preferences which afTect consumer acceptability. The mandate of lIT A to strengthen the NARS is also accomplished through such collaborative efforts .The trial was planted in 1993 at IDEFOR station in Azaguie (50 Km from Abidjan). IDEFOR staff observed that some plantlets ofTMPx 548-4, TMPx 548-9, TMPx 4698-1 and TMPx 7002-1 had virus-like symptoms in the seedling nursery . They rogued all these plants and only established symptomless plants of these genotypes in the field . After field establishment they observed only mosaiclike symptoms in TMPx 4698-1, Obino I' Ewai, Agbagba, and FHIA-3 . The plant crop was harvested in 1994 and data collected will be sent to liT A for statistical analyses . Based on information from the plant crop the most promising genotypes are TMP\" 548-4, TMPx 548-9, TMPx 2796-5 and TMPx 7002-1. They had good bunch weights but the fruits size was not as large as local preferences demand (i.e. the size of False Hom plantains). Initial taste panel results showed that the hybrids had hard flesh suitable for pounding. This supports results obtained from taste panel analysis of similar tissue culture derived material at !DEFOR. This problem was not apparent when taste panel analysis was carried out on material propagated through suckers. Hence, final palatability assessment based on taste panel will be delayed until fruits are harvested from the second cycle. Suckers were replanted in the second half of 1994 to get a more uniform trial in the second cycle.(Information provided by A.N'Guessan, O-i-e, Azaguie St. , lDEFOR) The AMYT was planted in 1993 at Kade Agricultural Research Station of the University of Ghana. Data for the plant crop and taste panels (collected in 1994) was been recently sent to lIT A for statistical analyses. lIT A hybrids showed high levels of resistance to black sigatoka, earlier flowering and a fruit filling period two weeks longer than locallandraces. However, again the fruit size was not as large as demanded by local preferences (False Horn plantains). Based on bunch weights per plant, FHIA-3 (17. I kg), TMPx 5511-2 (15 kg), TMPx 548-9 (14.9 kg) were the most productive hybrids in this trial (Table 3.37). However; some fruits dropped from the bunches ofFHIA-3 at full maturity.Rainfall at Kade is lower than at Dnne, which could explain why some of the hybrids selected at Dnne did not fully express their yield potential at Kade. Nonetheless, most of the hybrids out yielded the local checks (False Horn plantain landraces) in terms of bunch weight per plant: Dsoaboaso (I\\. 9 kg), Borodewuio (7.1 kg), Abomienu (93 kg) and Apantu (4 .4 kg). The local checks were grown in border plots (guard rows) adjacent to the AMYT at Kade. The bananas Cardaba, FHIA-3 and Yangarnbi km 5 were considered to produce too many suckers.Taste panel analysis (see Section 74) revealed that consumers did not like the flavour ofFHIA-3 as much as other cooking bananas such as Cardaba and TMBx 612-74 (BlTA-I). However, BITA-1 had seeds and poor fruit texture when cooked whereas FHlA-3 and Cardaba merely had poor fruit quality when cooked. Similar results have been reported earlier in taste panels at Dnne (see PBIP Annual Reports 1992 and1993). The TMPx were considered to have a \"sweet taste\" when ripe and may be amenable for Fufu . Although, Yangambi km 5 had small fruits it was considered to have a good taste for a dessert banana. The assessment of host plant resistance to banana weevil and plant parasitic nematodes are reported in Sections 5.4. and 5. 6., respectively.Scientists at Kade ARS would like to start improving the local plantain landraces by crossing them with the TMPx developed at lIT A. Some plantain landraces produce pollen in the early stages. so they may be crossed with the TMPx as maternal genotype in order to generate new hybrids. Also, scientists from Karle ARS have requested true hybrid seeds for in-country testing and selection. By diversifying the selection program it should be possible to enhance adaptation of specific material for Ghana. At this time Kade ARS does not have facilities for in vitro germination of seeds. However, training of staff based at University of Ghana (Legon campus) and CRI-Kumasi in embryo culture/rescue by liT A staff would be available to support Musa across-breeding in Ghana, providing funds were obtained for the relevant equipment. (Information provided by K. Afreh-Nuamah, E.K.S. Ahiekpor and J.K. Osei, University of Ghana, Kade ARS). Data collection will start in 1995 and will be sent to lIT A for statistical analyses after the harvest of the plant crop.An AMYT-I was established in Umuahia by the ADP-Abia State in October 1993. All plants grew vigorously in the plant crop helped by to sustained field maintenance and rigourous manual weed management. Poultry manure was applied at the rate of one head-pan per stand in March 1994. The Musa hybrids and landraces were established between alleys of Flemingia and intercropped with cocoyam. Assessment of host response to black sigatoka was carried out in collaboration with lIT A staff eight months after planting. This assessment was based on the youngest leaf with necrotic spots (YLS) and total number of standing leaves (NSL). All IITA plantain and cooking banana hybrids had a YLSINSL natio of about I. The plantain landraces (Agbagba and Obino l' Ewai) and the cooking banana Cardaba had a YLSfNSL ratio of about 2/3 while FHIA-3 had a YLSINLS ratio of4/5. An off-type ofFHIA-3 was observed in the trial . This plant was short with abnormal foliage and thick leaves. Data collection for the plant crop has finished and will be sent to lIT A for statistical analysis . (Information prOVided by E. Okoro, Abia State-ADP).Future Possibilities in Musa Breeding 3.7. 1 An ideotype for Musa improvement -updateThe statistical approach to studying GxE compares the observed phenotypic response of each genotype to a sample of environments. In contrast, in the analytical approach , biotic and abiotic stresses define the environments and phenotypes . Moreover, in the latter approach, individual components of complex phenotypic traits are investigated. This aims to simplify the analysis and to provide tools for the prediction and assessment of environmental effects on the phenotype.The empirical approach for the genetic improvement of a crop consists of \"defect elimination\" and \"selection for enhanced yield\" . While in the analytical approach a model (or ideotype) is established for each specified environment, aiming to increase the productivity in that specific situation. Ideotypes have often been determined with inputs from plant and crop physiology and morphology. The goal of ideo type breeding is \"to define the theoretically most efficient plant type for that crop and then breed towards Iili:, goal\" . In this way, breeders select for and not against specific phenotypes . One of the major benefits of ideotype breeding is that breeders are forced to define their goals and strategies in advance.Musa breeders should aim to select genotypes whose mother plant and sucker de¥eIop deep fast growing highly branched roots before flowering. This may increase plant anchorage and result in more efficient nutrient uptake.In April 1995 , a junior expert partially supported by the Vlaame Vereniging Voor Ontwikkelingssamenwerking en Technische Bijstand (VVOB) of Belgium, joined PBIP 10 work on roo I system development in Musa. This PhD project undertakes basic morphophvsiological research in support of the breeding program.Investigalions will compare the rool system development of a variety of genotypes grown in the field with Iho~ glOwn in polybags and hydroponics in the greenhouse. This project will re-assess the early root ideotype envisaged by PBIP breeders.Resis/ance /0 biotic stresses Genotypes with a youngest leaf spotted score ~ 10 at flowering should be selected for black sigatoka resistance. This resistance should be as a consequence of slow disease development in the host plant. Likewise, when selecting for Fusarium wilt resistance, breeders should choose those genotypes with rhizomes showing no tissue browning in transverse sections. As a secondary alternative genotypes can be selected which show isolated infection points in rhizome sections but wbere no external symptoms we apparent.Similarly, genotypes with healthy roots showing no nematode lesions or very light necrosis only in roots, should be considered when selecting for nematode resistance. Banana weevil resistant genotypes should have a coefficient of infestation :::;5%, as measured by the number of tunnels per rhizome at 5 cm below the base, in three year old fields . :':so, genotypes resistant to weevil damage should not have tunnels or traces of weevil infection in cross Sections, i.e. an average score < 0.3 on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 3 (heavy damage).Finally, genotypes resistant to Moko disease (bacterial wilt, Pseudomonas solanacearum Race 2) should have persistent male bracts or no male bud to avoid attraction of insect vectors. Resistance to this disease is only presently required in the Western hemisphere.Potential drought tolerant genotypes should have low leaf conductance to water vapour in the afternoon.Correlations between plant characteristics which relate to yield and the components of yield in the maternal parent, the derived tetraploid hybrids and two cooking bananas are shown in Tables 3.38 to 3.45.Obino I' Ewai and its tetraploid hybrids: TMPx 548-4 exhibited heavy bunches as a consequence of an increased number of hands and large fruits (mainly due to an increase in fruit circumference) (Table 3.38). Tall plants with fast ratooning (i.e. quick development of the follower or sucker) may also account for high yields. TMPx 1658•4 had heavy bunches due to more hands of many large fruits with increased fiuit circumference (Table 3.39). Plants of this hybrid showed heavy bunches perhaps because they had a longer fruit filling period which enhanced fruit circumference and thus fiuit weight. Tall plants with fast ratooning may also account for high yields. Bunch weight of Obino l'Ewai was negatively correlated with the short fruit filling period which may be related to the reducted fruit number and fiuit size (Table 3040). It appeared that a short fiuit filling period was common in short plants of Obi no l'Ewai. This may suggest that such plants were affected by black sigatoka leaf spot disease in their early development, resulting in premature flowering and the production of a small number of hands with few thin fingers. The most important trait affecting stability of bunch weight in Obino l'Ewai and its tetraploid offspring was fiuit circumference which was not significantly affected by GxE interaction (Table 2.24). For this reason, breeders should select hybrids with increased fruit circumference Variation in the genes assumed to confer fruit parthenocarpy was significantly correlated with fruit circumference. The hybrids may have achieved high yield potential due to their short growth cycle. In contrast, plantains exhibited longer growth cycles due to high apical dominance, which slowed sucker development .Bobby Tannap and its derived tetrilploid hybrids: TMPx 582-4 had high bunch weights mainly in tall plants due to many hands with heavy thick fruits (Table 3.41). Fruit length was correlated with days to flowering, i.e. early maturing plants had short fruits. Tall plants ofTMPx 2796-5 had high bunch weights due to many hands with a large number of heavy thick fingers (Table 3.42). High yield potential was achieved in this hybrid due to rapid sucker development . Moreover, high bunch weights may have resulted from an increased total number ofleaves, i.e. more leaves leading to higher photosynthetic area and thereby the higher number of hands. For Bobby Tannap higher yields were associated with many hands with many large heavy fruits . Fruit size, and thereby bunch weight, was significantly correlated with the length ofthe fruit filling period. Moreover, fruit circumference was correlated with the photosynthetic leaf area (i.e. total number of leaves) (Table 3.43). The low yields of Bobby Tannap relative to its hybrids (Table 3.27) may be due to its susceptibility to black sigatoka leaf spot disease. By reducing the host's photosynthetic area the fungal infection may also have shortened the fruit filling period, thereby reducing fruit development.There was no correlation between fruit length and number of fruits in all TMPx and between fruit length and number of hands in the French plantain,. This suggests that dehanding may not modifY fruit sizes.Cooking bananas: Bluggoe had high yields due to its large fruit circumference and fruit weight (Table 3.44) An increased photosynthetic area and an expanded fruit filling period may have contributed to these thick heavy fruits. The short growth cycle of Bluggoe may also be an important component of its high yield potential. The heavy bunches of Car dab a are due to a large number of thick fruits (Table 3.45). Fruit circumference was significantly correlated with the fruit filling period. Also high bunch weights were exhibited by tall plants. The high yield potential of Cardaba could be explained by the fast sucker growth which positively affected the components of bunch weight such as number of hands and fruits Genetic/phenotypic correlations and potefllia/ for \",uitilraitlindirect selection Correlated characters are important for Musa breeders because they are the result of either pleiotropism or genetic linkage. Moreover, genetic or environmental factors are responsible for phenotypic correlations (pp) between traits. The pp has been defined as follows:where PG and PE are the genetic and environmental correlation, respectively, and H2 was the heritability of the trait. Also pp may be calculated as follows: pp = HX 0 Hy PG + ex ey PE where HX and Hy are the square roots of the heritability for each of the traits under consideration, while! eX and ey are [I-HX2)1!2 and [1-Hy2) 112, respectively .The pleiotropy sbould be the main genetic basis of correlation between traits. However, linkage can cause transient correlation tbat may be broken by recombination. Unfortunately, segregation may only occur in progeny derived from crosses between divergent parental genotypes. For example, a significant pp between banana weevil resistance and corm hardness was observed in bananas but there was no statistically significant pp in plantain-banana bybrids (see PBIP 1993 Anooa1 Report). In addition, the environment may cause correlations when both traits are influenced in the same way by differences of enviroMlClltai conditions. Data were coDected from the plant and ratoon crops (1991-) 993) and analyzed in 1994 to calculate pp, PG and H2 in 63 diploid (Table 3.46), five triploid (Table 3.47) and 22 tetraploid plantain-banana hybrids (Table 3.48). Most of the bunch and fruit traits were positively and significantly associated with yidd components, especially at the tetraploid level.When both traits have low H2, pp arises mainly from environmental and non-additive genetic factors. Indeed, pp should be determined chiefly by PE• However, since most of the traits showed high H2, the PG should be more important. This was the case for most of the trait associations irrespective of their ploidy. Moreover, both PG and pp have the same positive (+) sign• in even-(or balanced-) ploidies (Tables 3.46 and 3 .48). This suggests that environmental changes affect the associated characters to a similar degree in both diploid and tetraploid hybrids. This may infer that the physiological mechanisms underlying these associated traits are the same. or interlinked in some way. In contrast, there was a negative phenotypic association between height of tallest sucker and fruit circumference. This oDservation together with the nil PG between both traits at the triploid level (Table 3.47) suggests that this correlation arose soldy through environmental factors in this odd-(or unbalanced-) ploidy. It is possible that competitive but genetically unlinked metabolic pathways which utilize the same substrates influence both sucker growth and fruit widening in the triploid hybrids. thereby causing this negative•pp.Diploid level: For most traits, pp was mainly accounted for by genetic corrdationJ either through pleiotropism or linkage. Therefore, PE among growth parameters of yieid and bunch/fruit traits was almost nil or negative. Positive aild significant pP and PG between fruit size and bunch weight suggest that sdection of big fruits wiD result in heavy bunch weight in the diploid hybrids.Iwlimct Kleaion for diploid lIOJ!UIalion improvement: The advantage of indirect sdection over direct selection can be assessed by the ratio between their expected selection gains (CRx and Rx). CRX is the correlated response in the trait X bued on indirect selection in the secondary trait Y, and RX is the genetic gain when selection was applied directly to the desired trait X. Thus:where iX and iy are the Jespeetive intensity of selection in standard units, and oOlt i. the genetic standard deviation of the trait under direct selection. From this equation, the following i, evident: CRX > RX when iX = iy and Hy > HX .. This infers that indirect selection should be carried out at the same intensity of selection when the secondary trait has higher heritability than the desired trait. For example, indirect selection for heavy bunches based on fruit length in the diploid population may be more efficient than direct selection for high bunch weight. Under equal intensity of selection the ratio CRXIRX = 1.25. Therefore, the intensity of selection based on direct selection for bunch weight needs to be three times that of indirect selection for bunch weight (based on fruit length) in order to achieve the same endpoint4.Polyploid level : Segregation observed in triploid and tetraploid hybrids will depend on the position of the locus with respect to the centromere and the occurrence of chiasmata (crossing overs). Hence, some associations observed at the tetraploid level may not occlir at the diploid level. Significant PG and PP account for how tall tetraploids are rapid cycling high yielding hybrids with heavy bunches of many large fruits obtained after a long fruit filling time. High PG might be due to the mode of2n egg formation in the triploid plantain parent i.e. second division restitution. This modified megasporogenesis in the triploid plantain genome allows the intact transmission of the genotype of the plantain parent to its tetraploid offspring for those loci between the first and second crossing over. The latter seldom occu rs in plantains because Musa chromosomes are small (see PBlP 1993 Annual Report). Genetic linkage between loci coding for traits with highly significant PG could be an alternative explanation for such significant associations.Indirect selection at the polyploid level: Selection for large fruit size at the tetraploid level should lead to high fruit weight, thereby resulting in tetraploid hybrids with heavy bunches. Indirect selection for bunch weight based on fruit length at the tetraploid level will be more efficient than direct selection solely based on bunch weight when iy > iX by about O.l%. This may be expected because the product (HY•PG) > HX (0.80 and 0.72, respectively).Signi1icant PG and PP between plant height and bunch weight at the tetraploid level suggests that selection of high yielding dwarf plantain hybrids may be difficult. A restricted selection index with a negative coefficient for plant height and a minimum but acceptable threshold for bunch weight may allow selection of short plantains with the required yield. Likewise, utilization of large segregating populations may allow breakage of any potential linkage between gene(s) for dwarfism and those for low yield.Linkage or pleiotropism and DG: A significant PG at the tetraploid level but not at the diploid level suggests that a number of associations were due to genetic linkage rather than due to pleiotropism. These associations were sucker development/fruit sizes, fruit filling time/number of hands and finger bunch-I, number of fruits bunchl/fruit girth and fruit filling time/fruit sizes. Such associations may be broken in large segregating populations. However we could not account for the significant PG which occurred between number of hands bunch-I /fruit sizes (weight and length only) in the diploids but not in the tetraploids.Pleiotropism may explain the significant PG between bunch weight and its components (number of hands and fruits) at both diploid and tetraploid level. In addition, pleiotropic gene action may account for the significant PG between height of the mother plant at flowering and height of the tallest sucker at harvest or the significant PG among fruit traits at both ploidy levels. 3.7.2 Assessment of genetic variability and breeding potential of offspring derived from somaclonal variants of the False Hom gene pool A French Reversion of the plantain cultivar Agbagba (PI) was crossed with 'Calcutta 4' (P2) to generate an F I population. A total of eight F I plants were selfed in 1990 to obtain the F2 population. After in vitro seed germination, 33 F2 individuals were transplanted to the field in 1991 . Growth parameters of yield, host plant response to black sigatoka and yield components in parents were assessed in the ratoon cycle of the F I and F 2 generations at Onne during 1992-] 993 (T.ble 3.49). Assessment of the ratoon crop seems to be more reliable (especially for bunch weight) than assessment of the plant crop (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report).The use of third and fourth degree statistics allows differences within an F2 to be detected and genetic control of the trait to be inferred. Examples of such statistics include, skewness (the degree of departure of a distribution from symmetry) and kurtosis (the. gradient of the distribution as compared to that of a normal distribution). Skewness can be calculated as fonows: SKp = (~. mode)/a where ~ and (J are the mean and standard deviation. An alternative formula is: SKp = 3 (~ -median)/a When SKp = 0, the distribution is symmetrical (e.g. normal distribution). Kurtosis measures the shape of the peak of the distribution. A unimodal distribution may have a normal peak, a high peak (acute) or a low peak (flat). The normal distribution has a normal peak (mesokurtic). A distribution with a high peak is called leptokurtic (+) while the one with a low peak is known as platykurtic (-). Kurtosis may be measured by the moment coefficient of kurtosis (132) as follows:where ~4 is the fourth moment about the mean and 54 is the square of the second moment about the mean. Fatal deleterious genes will cause the progeny distribution to deviate from normality. These genes can be expressed after selfing and are a major factor underlying inbreeding depression. Gene interactions can also be detected by estimating kurtosis. 132 will be positive (Ieptokurtic) in the presence of gene interaction and negative (platykurtic) or zero (mesokurtic) in the absence of epistasis.A platykurtic distribution with a negative skewness occurs when deleterious genes increase the frequency of poor phenotypes and reduce the frequency of outstanding phenotypes. In this regard, the degree of deleterious genes may be measured by the coefficient of variation (CV = CJ/~) . Thus, the larger the load of deleterious genes fixed in the population, the more asymmetrical the frequency distribution and the larger the CV. A disproportionate reduction in yield between classes will increase the CV because a reduction in ~ was not followed by an analogous reduction in u .Analysis of frequency distributions in the F2 population (Figs. 3.14-3.29) indicated a significant positive skewed distribution towards low values for each trait. Traits affected were the youngest leaf with black sigatoka symptoms at flowering (p< 0.05), total leaf area attacked by black sigatoka (P< 0.01), bunch weight (P< 0.01), fruit weight (P< 0.01) and fruit length (P< 0.01) (Table 3.50). Kurtosis was significant and positive (Ieptokurtic) for the youngest leaf with black sigatoka symptoms at flowering (P< 0.001), total leaf area attacked by black sigatoka (P< 0.001) and days to fruit filling (P< 0.01) (Table 3.50). The coefficient of variation was high (i.e. CV> 35%) for the youngest leaf with black sigatoka symptoms at flowering, total leaf area attacked by black sigatoka, bunch weight, number of fruits per bunch and fruit weight.Genetic parameters were calculated for populations derived from the cross between Asbagba French Reversion (AAB) and Calcutta 4 (AA). This analysis was based on the phenotypes of parental, F I and FZ genotypes (Tible 3.St). Incomplete generation mean analysis considered the foHowing equations: PI =m+d PZ=m-d FI =m+h FZ = m+O.5 h where PI, P2, F I and FZ are the average phenotypes of each parent and their respective hybrid and segregating offspring. While, 'm', 'd' and 'b' are the mean, additivity and dominance, respectively. Means were weighted to take allowance of unequal precision in the estimation by the reciprocal of the squared standard error. Matrix algebra was applied to solve the system of simultaneous equations with three unknowns (m, d, h). Heritability was calculated as:where a 2 F2 is the variance of the F2 population and a 2 p is the pooled variance (among plants within genotypes) of all the parental genotypes (PI, P2, FI)'This genetic analysis revealed that black sigatoka resistance, plant girth, days to fruit filling, number of hands, fruits per bunch and fruit sizes are highly heritable in the diploid offspring of Agbagba 'French Reversion' x Calcutta 4. Several genes seem to control quantitative variation in bunch and fruit weight, and fruit sizes in this population. Additivity (or incomplete dominance) was important for total number of leaves and number of fruits per bunch. Dominance over the wild diploid banana genotype was observed in plant girth, sucker development, number of hands per bunch, fruit weight, length and circumference. Conversely, dominance over the French Reversion genotype was observed for leaf length/width ratio, number of standing leaves at flowering, and black sigatoka susceptibility. Transgressive segregation was observed for number of standing leaves at flowering. This may suggest that epistatic genes control this trait. Also epistasis was important for the genetic control of black sigatoka resistance, days to fruit filling, bunch weight, fruit weight and length. Most of the genetic systems reported above are supported by previous results (see PBIP Annual Reports 1992 and1993) Significant heterosis from the mid-parent (i.e. F I > [PI + P2]/2) was recorded for total leaf area attacked by black sigatoka. sucker development, number of hands and fruits per bunch, and days for fruit filling . No significant inbreeding depression was observed for any of these traits. However, high CV values suggested thaI deleterious genes may be fixed (i.e. genetic load) in this 7S population for host response to black sigatoka, bunch and fruit weight, and fruit length. It is therefore unlikely to be viable to proceed with population improvement at the diploid level within this gene pool.3 7] Breeding for dwarf plantains to escape wind damage This activity aimed to develop dwarf plantains by crossing dwarflandraces with diploid bananas. However, the dwarflandraces have very low female fertility .During two years of crosses the dwarf French plantains set an average of only 0.1 seeds per bunch while no seeds at all were set by the dwarf False Hom plantains.For the reason the dwarf land races have been relocated in a new plot which will receive high inputs of mulch, manure and pesticides.Concomitantly, an alternative strategy has been developed . This consists of using semi-dwarf and dwarf offspring derived from (Bobby Tannap x Calcutta 4] .Segregation for dwarfism, due to shortening of the false internodes, was observed at both diploid and tetraploid levels in FI and sibj populations (see PBIP Annual Reports 1992 and1993). One single recessive gene dw controls dwarfism in this cross. The substitution of the dominant Dw by its recessive allele reduced plant height by 36 cm 2 in the F I (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report). Therefore, phenotypic selection based on short false internode should be effective to develop a short size breeding population. However, it was observed that the diploid parent and some hybrid offspring showed an increase in false internode length in the ratoon crop resulting in an increase in plant height.The genetic improvement .of Musa was considered to be essentially diploid breeding due to the sterile nature of the most widely grown triploid cultivated types . More recently, of course, there has been success in the direct utilization of a wild non-related banana such as Calcutta 4 in the production of black sigatoka resistant plantains. From the same crosses it has been possible to develop diploid plantains. However, improved banana diploids are still considered an important component of the genetic improvement of Musa species. Diploid parental genotypes are selected on the basis offemale and male fertility, black sigatoka resistance and good bunch characteristics (including fruit parthenocarpy). liT A has selected twelve such diploid hybrids (see PBIP Annual Reports 1992 and1993). Banana breeding for the East African Highlands accounted for around 21 % of the bunches pollinated at Onne in 1994 (Table 3.3). Both AAA and ABB cookinglbeer bananas were used as female parents in 3x-2x crosses with diploid bananas used as male parents. Igitsiri (beer banana) had very poor seed production (0. ) seeds per bunch) from which no viable embryos could be recovered, while Igisahira Gisangwe (cooking banana) appeared to be highly female sterile at Onne, producing no seed in 1994. Crosses between other ABB cooking bananas (Cardaba and F ougamou) and dessert bananas (Yangambi Km 5 and Pisang lilin) produced relatively large numbers of seed. However, the efficiency with which viable embryos could be recovered remained low (4.8%) . Only 142 hybrid plants were generated from the treament of 2921 seeds.PBIP have selected new parental genotypes (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report) for in vitro multiplication and planting in pollination blocks during 1995.Investigations will also be initiated to optimize the embryo rescue technique for crosses using maternal beer and cooking banana genotypes. Through the use of new crossing schemes and imprctved embryo rescue techniques it is hoped to increase greatly the production of new hybrids suitable for East and Southern Africa. Data for bunch weight and its components in the plant crop will be completed during the second quarter of 1995 .Preliminary analysis shows that TMPx 548-4, TMPx 1658-4 and TMPx 5511-2 out yielded the highest yielding plantain cultivar Obino I' Ewai. These hybrids also showed high black sigatoka resistance, earliness and good ratooning (Table 4.1) Other hybrids had relatively lower yields and longer production cycles. This suggests these hybrids selected at Onne (lowland humid forest) were not well-adapted to the mid-altitude zone in Uganda. Although this is still an important disease, the production of resistant plantain and banana germplasm by cross~breeding schemes has allowed priority to be transferred to other biotic stresses: Fusarium wilt, banana weevil, nematodes and viruses.PBIP breeders have generated hybrid populations from crossing parental genotypes with resistance(s) to various pest(s) and disease(s). Screening techniques are being improved at PBIP and at ESARC to select for resistance to Panama disease, banana weevil, nematodes and viruses. The overall aims are to develop back-up populations which contain a combination of specific resistance genes. Individuals from these populations will then be used in the regular cross-breeding program for cultivar development.The main area ofIlTA-NARS interaction in Musa research since 1992 has been the genetic improvement of plantain and banana through the distribution and testing of breeding material. liT A and NARS are equal partners dedicating their own resources towards the success of multilocational trials. NARS and lIT A scientists are not carrying out multilocational testing solely to identifY clones suitable for furth er cultivar rel ease by African nati onal programs. They are also und ert aking basic studies to gain more knowledge in areas such as host-response to black sigatoka disease. This Section discusses the genotypic response to black sigatoka (Myco~phaere/la jijiensis) of plantain-banana hybrids and their parental genotypes together with landraces and non-African (exotic) germplasm when cropped in West and Central Africa.Twelve hybrids, three plantain landraces, two Asian cooking bananas, two diploid banana parents and one export dessert banana were evaluated through the dry and rainy seasons of 1993 and 1994. These genotypes were assessed across eleven locations in West and Central Africa: Ghana (I), Nigeria (8) and Cameroon(2) (Table 5. This provides an estimation of the available photosynthetic leaf area prior to fruit filling .There were significant differences between genotypes (P< 0 .001) in hostresponse to black sigatoka (Table 5.2). Calcutta 4 exhibited a 'high level of resistance' to black sigatoka (i.e. no necrotic spots on any leaves), while Pi sang lilin and TMBx 612-74 were regarded as 'resistant' because they did not show typical latc stage symptoms in mos: environments. Most of the plantain hybrids (TMPx) tested exhibited 'partial resistance' to this leaf spot disease. This type of host-plant response is under the genetic control of recessive/additive alleles which slows the progress of the epidemic (see PBIP Annual Reports 1992 and 1993 and Section 5.3 :n this report) . This type ofresistance is preferable to complete immunity which inhibit s disease initiation and puts a greater pressure on the pathogen to overcome the resistance TMPx 162 J -I. TMPx 1658-4 and the cooking bananas were less susceptible to blac k sigatok a as measured by both YLS and INSL. However, all the plantain landraces and the export banana cuItivar Valery were susceptible to M fi jiensis There were significant differences (P< 0 00 I) for the severity of black sigatoka across eilVironments. Scores of INSL in the dry season were always higher than those of the rainy season (Table 5.1). This could be due to the presence of high ascospore concentrations during humid conditions while in the dry season both the severity and incidence of black sigatoka were low (Table 5There was also a significant genotype-by-environment interaction (p< 0 .001), which accounted for 22% of the sum of squares ofINSL. However, there were no significant cross order season-by-year interactions. Hence, the genotypic response to this disease should be assessed in the rainy season, when ascospore production is high .The stability of black sigatoka resistance has been reported }Jrevlous ly in the TMPx germplasm (see PBlP 1993 Annual Report) . However, this approach was based on a dynamic concept of stability i.e. host response in relation to the degree of severity in each environment. It would be more convenient to assess the \"homeostatic\" host response to black sigatoka through the coefficient of phenotypic variation (PCY). This is calculated as follows :where Si is the phenotypic standard deviation and Xi is the genotypic mean. To enable selection of clones with potential durable resistance a graph was drawn by plotting the genotypic means (abscissa) against the PCY (ordinate) (Figs. 5.1 and 5.1). High genotypic means and low PCY reflect a very low level of variability in the resistance to black sigatoka across environments. This may be an indicator of potential durable resistance . Almost all the hybrids tested (Fig. 5.1) ann their diploid banana parents exhibited this type of genotypic response (rigftt lower quadrant in Fig. 5.1) However, the cooking bananas, TMPx 1621-1 and TMPx 1658-4 had a stable but 'less susceptible' host-response to black sigatoka.To understand the host-pathogen interaction across environments. the interaction values (e ge ) were calculated (Tables 5.3 and 5 Y. is the degree of black sigatoka severity in the e th environment (as measured by the mean of the host response of all the entries in that environment) and Y . is the grand mean. Principal component analyses (PCA) were performed to investigate the interaction between the genotypic response to black sigatoka and the degree of severity in each environment. A biplot was constructed by plotting the interaction PCA scores (IPCA) I and 2 on the abscissa and the ordinate, respectively (Figs.5.4 and 5.6). Forty-five percent of the axE interaction for host response to black sigatoka disease (as measured by INSL) was accounted for by the [peA axes.Points near to the origin (0,0) had little axE interaction, e.g. environments such as the dry season of 1994 at Dnne (marked as 094D in Fig. 5.4). There was also little axE interaction of 'highly resistant' genotypes such as Calcutta 4 and its 'partially resistant' hybrids TMPx 548-9 (marked as 2 in Fig. 5.4), TMPx 1621-1 (4). TMPx 4698-1 (9) or Pi sang lilin and its hybrid TMPx 2796-5 (8). The black sigatoka resistant cooking banana hybrid TMBx 612-74 exhibited a significant GxE interaction because it showed typical black sigatoka induced leaf spots in only some environments. The environments showed different interaction patterns irrespective of the season or the location. Hence, the host-plant response may differ depending on the environmental conditions. Full-sib hybrids such as those derived from the cross between Obino l' Ewai and Calcutta 4 ( IabeUed 1,2,4,7,9,10 and II in Fip. 5.3 and 5.5) exhibited different host response to blaclc sigatoka as well as different interaction patterns (Fip. 5.4 and 5.6). This demonstrates that one single offspring from a specific family will not suffice to asseas the value of a particular cross in multilocational trials.There is reason te hope that the resistance exhibited by Calcutta 4 and its hybrid offspring may be durable in African environments. Although conclusions relating to durability of resistance based on multilocational testing are not unreasonable, both widespread and prolonged cultivation are the only true test of durable resistance.In conclusion, this joint NARS-IIT A epidemiological research shows that powerful statistical tools as well as field testing provide means to determine levels of resistance in the host plant as well as to elucidate host plant-pathogen interactions.Mechanisms of Resistance to Black SigatokaResistance to black sigatoka in plantain-banana hybrids is conferred by a major recessive gene (bs}) and two minor additive modifiers (bsrj) which enhance the resistance to this fungal leaf spot disease (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report). This experiment was performed to quantify the additive effect of the allele bs} as well as the intralocus interaction.The genotypes of the bs} locus in the euploid hybrids evaluated for host plant response to black sigatoka leaf spotted disease which were used in this experiment are shown in Table 5.5. Genotyping of the bs}locus was confinned by selfing or sibmating a sample of euploid hybrids (see PBIPAnnual Reports 1992 and 1993 and Section 2.2.2 in this report). Putative recessive or nulliplex genotypes for the bs} locus did not show segregation after selfing or sibmating among themselves. However, the offspring of susceptible hybrids displayed all the phenotypic variation expected for heterozygous genotypes. The euploid hybrids were derived from crosses between a French plantain (Obino l' Ewai or Bobby Tannap) and Calcutta 4. Host response to black sigatoka leaf spot disease at flowering was assessed in the plant and ratoon crops at Onne from 1991 to 1993 . The level of disease was measured in terms of the youngest leaf spotted, the youngest leafwith any symptoms, total leaf area attacked by black sigatoka disease in a 0-6 scale (converted to percentage) and by an index ofleaves with necrotic spots. The number of standing leaves at flowering was also recorded . Data were analyzed following a nested analysis of variance (clone/ploidy/family) over the ratoon and plant crops. The analysis took account of the unequal sample sizes within ploidies for each cross.There was a significant interaction between genotype and production cycle for most of the methods used to assess host plant response to black sigatoka.However, the analyses of variances (Table 5.6) suggested that genotypic differences accounted for most of the phenotypic variation in host response to this disease. Significant differences were observed between genotypes within each ploidy (P< 0.05 or P< 0.001) in diploid progeny from both crosses and in tetraploid progeny from Obino l' Ewai x Calcutta 4. Means for host response to black sigaloka leaf spot disease at flowering were calculated across cycles, families and ploidies within families (Table 5.7).Variance components were calculated based on plot means per cycle for genotypes (cr 2 G), environments (cr 2 E), genotype-by-environment interaction (cr 2 GE/r), families (o2 F ), ploidies within families (cr 2 X1P) and clones within ploidies within families (cr 2 CIX/P). This allowed the estimation of repeatability (R), broad sense heritability (H2) and intraclass correlation coefficients for families (Tf), ploidies (rx) and clones (re), for host response to black sigatoka leaf spot disease in the segregating euploid plantain-banana hybrids (Table 5.8). As shown by the analyses of variance most of the genetic variation (measured by H2) depended on the individual genotypes irrespective of their ploidy in each family.The analyses of frequency distribution for number of standing leaves at flowering (Fig. 5.7), host response to black sigatoka leaf spot disease at flowering as measured by the youngest leaf spotted (Fig. 5.8), youngest leaf with symptoms (Fig. 5.9), total leaf area attacked by black sigatoka disease in a 0 to 6 scale (Fig. 5.10), or in percentage (Fig. 5.11), and index ofleaves with necrotic spots (Fig. 5.12) are shown in Table 5.9. Almost all the traits showed a normal distribution irrespective of their ploidy level. Hence, additive gene action may play an important role in the host response to black sigatoka. Transgressive segregation which maybe due to epistasis, was observed for number of standing leaves at flowering. Due to the small sample size, no hybrids were observed to have the 'highly resistant' phenotype of Calcutta-4. This may suggest that the host response to black sigatoka of Calcutta 4 could have a polygenic basis.All genetic analyses suggest that both Obino I'Ewai and Bobby Tannap have similar genotypes for the bs jlocus (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report). Analyses of variance of host response to black sigatoka leaf spot disease. based on the genotype and net effect of intralocus interaction of bs jlocus are shown in Table 5.10. The GxE interaction was not important when the analyses were based on the marker genotype. This was expected since Mendelian genetic markers are seldom affected by the environment.The host response to black sigatoka was significantly enhanced by the bs j allele frequency and the interactions at the bs jlocus as shown by the least square means (Table 5.11) . The means across triploids should be approached with caution due to their small sample size. improper assignment of genotypes or imbalance of gene action due to triploidy. Nonetheless, the disease developed slower in the putative 'partial resistant' triploids than in their full-sib susceptible triploids .Simple regression and correlation analyses revealed that genetic effects rather than ploidy level affected the host response to black sigatoka (Table 5.12).However a significant dosage effect may be expected since there was a significant correlation between the bs j allele frequency and host response to black sigatoka.The correlations between ploidy levels and the descriptors for black sigatoka host response were not significant (P> 0.05) within and between crosses. Multiple regression models based on intralocus interactions (X 1) and allele frequency (X2) in the bs jlocus (Table 5.13) were significant for the following descriptors (Yi) scored at flowering : number of standing leaves. youngest leaf spotted. youngest leaf with symptoms. total leaf area with symptoms of black sigatoka disease on a 0-6 scale. or in percentage (except in Bobby Tannap x Calcutta 4) and index of leaves with necrotic spots (except in Obino I' Ewai x Calcutta 4).The net effect on the bs j locus was significantly more important than the additive effect (as measured by the bs j allele frequency) for total number of leaves and the youngest leaf with symptoms. However, both were equally important for the youngest leaf spotted when results were combined over the two crosses. This was determined by the significance of the partial regression coefficients (Table 5.13). Non-3ignificant regression coefficients should be discarded from the statistical model because they were initially considered due to their significant correlation with the other independent variable. This analysis suggests that intralocus interactions (i.e. the net effect of bs j locus) controlled the appearance of black sigatoka symptoms on the leaf surface.However, both the additive effect and the intralocus interaction of the bs jlocus controlled the development of the disease in the host plant (as measured by the youngest leaf spotted). Hence, the overall gene action of the bs jlocus may provide i: ., durable resistance to black sigatoka because as it slows the disease development in the host plant. As a consequence, resistant hybrids show more healthy leaves, i.e. more photosynthetic leaf area, than their susceptible full-sibs. This may partially account for their high yields. Each genotype was represented by live plants and each leaf was considered as a sampling unit. Host plant response to the disease was measured in terms of the incubation time (IT), the evolution time (ET) and the disease development time (DDT). IT measures the days between the early unfolding of the leaf (stage B in Brun's scale) and the appearance of small depigmentation spots on the underside of the leaf (or stage I in Foure's scale). The number of days between Foure's stage I and the appearance of mature lesions with dry spots surrounded by a clearly defined yellow halo (or stage 6 in Foure's scale) has been called ET. DDT measures the days between Brun's stage B and Foure's stage 6. DDT has proven to be a reliable descriptor for the genotypic reaction of Musa germplasm to M. jijiensis. Also the leaf emission time (days from planting to Brun's stage B) and leaf lifetime (days from Brun's stage B to leaf death, either due to leaf hanging or 100\"10 leaf area spotted by black sigatoka) were calculated.Data collection has been completed for the plant crop and the results from analyses (of both plant and ratoon crops) will be reported in next year's annual report. Similar investigations were carried out using the 1993 PYT -plant crop.These results are currently being analyzed and will also be published in the PBIP 1995 Annual Report.Banana weevil damage was assessed in the plant crop of the AMYT at Kade (Ghana) (see Section 3.6.3). The percentage of the conn damased by weeW was assessed in cross-Sections of the outer and inner conn at 0 cm, 5 em and 10 an from the base. In the original data both skewness and kunosis were significant because some plots had no weevil damage. Hence, square root transformation was required to obtain lower coefficients of variation (15-50%) than those of the • original data (100-5000;.,). However, the original data was used for biological comparisons (Table 5.14).The results were very similar to those reported It OMe (see PBIP 1993 Annual Report). BIT A-I (TMBx 612-74) was the most resistant genotype in the AMYT-Kade. No weevil damage was observed in any of its conns. In contrast, Agbagba was the most susceptible to weevil damage, especially in the outer conn. The level of susceptibility to weevil damage in the outer conn exhibited by Obino I' Ewai was not significantly different from most of its hybrids except PIT A-J (IMP 5511-2). Although PIT A-8 (TMPx 7002-1) had been scored as susceptible at Onne (see PBIP 1993 Annual Report), it showed high levels of resistance to weevil•at Kade.Fusarium Wilt Resistance 5.5.1 Laboratory/Screenhouse assessment A preliminary screening of cooking banana hybrids for Fusarium wilt (or Panama disease) resistance using single plantlets was perfonned at the University of Florida (Homestead, USA) (Table 5.15). None of the nTA hybrids showed a host response significantly different (P> 0.05) from that ofBluggoe or Pisans awak when screened with South Florida isolates (Race I) under greenhouse conditions. However, most hybrids (except TMBx 1378) showed a significantly bigber level of resistance than Pisang Iwak to South Florida Race 2 isolates. TMBx 612-74 showed significantly higher resistance than Pisang awak (but lower than Blugoe) when screened with an East African isolate (recovered &om the AAA banana Kibuzi) under incubator conditions. furthermore, TMBx 612-74 and Pi sang awak showed statistically similar host response to another isolate recovered from the AB East African banana Sukari Ndizi (VCG 0124). On this basis, it seems that lIT A's cooking banana hybrids do not have high levels of resistance to Panama disease.Fields known to have high infestations of Fusarium wilt spp. are suggested as \"hot spots\" to assess host response to Panama disease . Under these conditions precise experimental design is crucial to avoid escapes that might be reponed as true resistance to this disease.TMBx 1378, a cooking banana hybrid, was planted for resistance screening in a Fusarium wilt infested plot at NARD's Research Station at Kawanda (Uganda) in March 1995. If this hybrid exhibits a good level of resistant to Fusarium wilt together with adequate yield and acceptable fruit quality, it could replace the widespread cultivar Kayinja which is succumbing to Panama disease in Uganda.The first honeycomb trial to assess Fusarium wilt resistance at Onne was abandoned since after 2 years the susceptible check Gros Michel showed high survival rates (;90%). The \"hot spot\" status of this site is now in serious doubt.Selected banana diploid hybrids (TMB2x 5105-1, TMB2x 6142-2, TMB2x 9128-3) were planted in a second honeycomb trial (Fig. 5.12). The new location is a section of an Onne field reported to have Fusarium wilt during the mid-80's. Al so the diploid hybrids have been sent to ESARC for Fusarium wilt fieid screening under East African conditions.ResistaDU to NematodesThis activity involves the development of reliable screening and sampling methods which will allow the accurate assessment of host response to nematodes and evaluation of gerrnplasm for nematode resistance. In addition, a joint project with the KUL (see ~ 4) will commence in 1995 . This project has been partially The different components of host response to nematodes need to be assessed and described . These are :-root and corm health -mat appearance as measured by the percentage of lodged plants -species profiles and numbers -reproductive parameters (male/female ratios, reproductive capacity (pfi]) -index of damage development time (preferably done in vitro, in hydroponics, or in a rhizotron) .Appropriate analysis and evaluation of these parameters could provide the basis for grouping different host responses and to define these into nematode resistance, tolerance and susceptibility groups. In addition, appropriate sampling methods still need to be developed . Adequate field plot techniques for the evaluation of host response to nematodes will be determined using uniform trials at ESARC (for East African highland bananas) and at Onne (for plantains). Optimum plot size, number of replications and number of samples per mat also need to be defined and standardized.Host plant response to nematodes and root health were assessed by nematologists of IIT AlESARC and University of Ghana.Preliminary results from MET -2 trial suggested that plant parasitic nematodes caused 50% plant loss in infected versus clean plots. However, host response to nematodes was highly variable among the banana genotypes (Table 5.16). The nematode Radopholus similis caused most of the root damage.Furthermore, a number of cultivars and plantain hybrids produced good yields, irrespective of nematode infection. Analysis of this difference in host response should soon provide us with a better understanding of yield loss and of resistance and toleraltce to nematodes.Kade ARS (University a/Ghana)Nematode counts and number of healthy roots in the AMYT -Kade had normal distributions, except counts of Pratylenchus spp. which had a significant kurtosis. Their combined analyses of variance over plant age showed low coefficients of variation (5%-15%). Therefore, no data transformation was required.Preliminary analyses showed that all genotypes tested had nematodes associated with their roots (Table 5.17). There were no significant differences (p> 0.05) between genotypes for the number of healthy roots and for nematode populations associated with 109 of Musa roots at different plant ages (Tabla 5.17 and 5.18). Nonetheless, the roots of PIT A-S (TMPx 7002-1) and PIT A-3 (TMPx 5511-2) had the lowest densities of associated nematodes (Table 5.17). However, the number of healthy roots were also among the lowest in this trial (Table 5.1There was a significant (P< 0.001) genotype-by-age interaction for plant parasitic nematodes counts obtained for 109. of Musa roots. Moreover, this interaction was significant for all nematode species except Helicotylenchus multicinctus (P> 0.05). Therefore the assessment of nematode resistance, based on counts of the parasite associated with the roots, may be affected by plant age and the genotype of the plant host. At Kade, Radopholus simi lis was not observed to be associated with PITA-S (TMPx 7002-1) nor were Meloidogyne spp. associated with PITA-3 (TMPx 5511-2) (Table !U8). PITA-i (TMPx 548-4) had on average the lowest nematode counts for Helicotylenchus multicinc/Us whereas the lowest nematode counts for Pratylenchus spp. were recorded in PITA-8 (TMPx 7002-1) and Agbagba (Table 5.18).A significant (P< 0.001) increase of nematode density with plant age was correlated with a significant (p< 0.00 i) decrease in the number of healthy roots. This was expected since no new roots emerge after shooting but roots are still functional at harvest. However, there was no significant phenotypic correlations between the number of healthy roots and associated nematode density at different plant ages (p> 0.05). Hence, root health assessment shOuld not be regarded as a reliable method for nematode resistance screening.Of the 30 phenotypic correlations among nematode counts at each plam age only two were significant except for PratyienchuslRadopholus counts at three weeks after flowering and nine weeks after flowering (r = 0.656, P = 0.026 and r = 0.677, P = 0.020, respectively). The significant phenotypic correlationslDgbt have arisen by chance (i.e. 2/30). It may be that there are independent genetic systems of the host plant which control tolerance of specific plant parasitic nnnatodes in MIISQ roots. MoreOver, the results suggested that nematode resistancti in MIISQ may be • complex polygenic epistatic trait. Hence, the development of nematode resistant populations may be slow since progeny testing will be required to determine the breeding value of the parental genotypes. This is not exceptional because moderate to low probability of success in host plant resistance to nematodes was reported for other crops in the early 1980's.MuSIl clones have been identified which have exhibited rerennial vigour after more than five years continuous cropping in field geneban1cs on the poor soils ofOnne Station (Table S.19). This may be indicative ofa good root system and/or nematode resistance.At the end of 1994, parental genotypes (Agbagba French reversion, Bobby Tannap, Calcutta 4, Fougarnou, Pisang jari buaya, SH-3362), primary tetraploids (TMPx 1112-1, TMPx 4479-1 , TMBx 1378) and secondary triploids (TMP3x 15108-1, TMP2x 15108-2, TMPx 15108-6) were sent to the Deptartment of Agriculture at University of Reading. Screening for nematode reSistance, especially Rodopholus similis. under glasshouse conditions has conimenced as part of a PhD Thesis.Genotypic Respooses to Baoana Virus(es)There are several prerequisites to the initiation of a virus resistance breeding program. It must be possible to recognize the range of genotype specific reactions to virus infection. It is crucial that symptomless tolerant plants can be distinguished from truely resistant genotypes. This necessitates a highly precise diagnostic test.In addition, it should be possible to identity ttte most abundant vectors of viruses such as banana streak virus (BSV) in order that resistance to the feeding of these insects might also be targeted in the breeding program.The occurrence of viruses in multilocational trials has provided the means to assess the genotypic responses of Musa germplasm to viral diseases occurring in sub-Saharan Africa. Data sets of virus incidence, based on visual assessment of symptom expression in the experimental fields, were analyzed following conventional two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) and the additive main effects multiplicative interaction model (AMMI). Such an approach would be expected to facilitate the identification of potentially resistant germplasm and allow a preliminary study of host-plant/virus interactions across environments.Environments were defined as a combination oflocation by date of evaluation.There was a statistically significant difference between virus symptom incidence across environments (Table 5.20). This followed the trend of higher in the cool rainy season (14-42%) and lower in the warm dry season «10%). There were significant differences between genotypes in their responses to virus(es).However there was also a significant genotype (clone) by environment interaction (Table 5.20).Bananas, especially those derived fromM acuminata (Calcutta 4, Pisang The AAB French plantains Bobby Tannap and Obino l' Ewai had a similar genotypic response to the virus( es ) (about 10\"/0 incidence) and were regarded as less susceptible than tbe False Hom plantain Agbagba, which showed virus-like symptoms in most of the environments (average 21 % incidence) (Tables 5.21 and 5.21) .. AII plantain hybrid. showed virus-like symptoms, however, there were significant differences in genotypic response to the virus( es) between different hybrids (Tabla 5.11 and 5.22). The hybrid 597-4, TMPx 548-9, TMPx 4698-1, TMPx 548-4 and TMPx 2637-49 were among the most susceptible plantain hybrids (> 40% virus incidence) .. TMPx 6930-1 was tbe least susceptible plantain hybrid with a similar genotypic ~sponse to virus(es) as its parental plantain landrace Obino l' Ewai. The other susceptible hybrids (TMPx 1112-1, TMPx 5511-2, TMPx 2796-5, TMPx 2481, TMPx 582-4, TMPx 1621-1, TMPx 1658-4) exhibited 23% to 3S% incidence of virus-like symptoms. In light of the fact that a dift'erent randomizItion wu UMd at each site, the highly highly significant value for genotypic variation among clones (P< 0.001) suggests a very low potential for escapes of virus infection . The occurrence of transgressive segregation (i.e. the appearance in the segregating generation of offspring exceeding the limits of variation defined by the parents) in the genotypic response of the hybrids suggests that epistasis may be the main non-additive gene interaction system controlling the su~ceptibility ofTMPx germplasm to Mum virus(es). Epistatic gene interactions could have arisen due to the genetic combination created from cross breeding of the susceptible plantain . landraces and the diploid bananas. TMPx may have inherited gene(s) for susceptibility from their plantain parents, which enhanced the expression of virus susceptibility by interacting with genes inherited from tht' banana parent.Repeatability (R) was calculated individually for ead! set of trials (MET-I and MET-2) from the ratio of the variance components as follows:where cr 2 G is the intergenotypic (or genetic variance), (12GE is the variance of the genotype-by-environment interaction, and cr~ is the environmental variance. R measures the relative importance of each variance component in the phenotype and varies from 0 (i.e. no genetic variance) to infinity (i.e. nil environmental effect and nil genotype-by-environment interaction). R was larger in MET-I than in MET-2 (Table S_20), because larger relative genetic variation was observed in MET-I than in MET -2 (despite MET -2 having more diverse material). Nonetheless, the variance components ofMET-2 should be more reliable than those of MET-I since an increase in the number of diverse environments results in unbiased estimates of statistical parameters. Hence, AMMI analysis was performed only in MET-2.The AMMI model was developed to analyze trials with a focus on the genotype-by-environment interactions. AMMI uses the ANOY A to study the main effect~ of genotypes and environments and principal component arWysis (PeA) for the residual multiplicative interaction. AMMI model I (Fig. 5.13) captured 75% of the total variation: 6OYo due to the main clonal and environmental effects (m X axis) and 15% due to their interaction (Y axis). All the plantain hybrids derived from [Obino l'Ewai x Calcutta 4] (except TMPx 693G-I) and TMPx 2796-5, a hybrid of [Bobby Tannap x Pisang lilin], are in the highly unstable susceptible qvadrant (upper right). Conversely, their pseudo-reciprocals TMPx 582-4 (=Bobby Tannap x Calcutta 4) and TMPx 1658-4 (=Obino l'Ewai x Pisanglilin) were close to the centre. This supports the epistatic: genetic modd for virus susceptibilify since clones with related pedigrees (i.e. half-sibs) were not grouped together. An increase in clonal susceptibility resulted in a more unstable response to the virus.Similarly an incn-.ase in clonal resistance also resulted in a more unstable mpoase Finally, the significant GxE interaction may be interpreted as a warning signal for strain differentiation in the testing sites. However, AMMI 2 biplot clearly shows that seasonal rather than locational diversity accounts for most of the interaction patterns (Fig. 5.15). Also the putative non-systernicity of the virus may affect the susceptible host response, thereby increasing the magnitude of the GxE interaction.After the first ratoon (end of 1994) all multilocational evaluation trials (METs) at IITA stations in West and Central Africa were. destroyed due to the development of high incidence of virus-like symptoms in both hybrids and landraces. Similar recommendation were given to our partners in African NARS. Propagation of Selected GenotypesMusa germplasm had heen multiplied at Onne station and supplied to leading laboratories in Europe and the USA to support a wide range of collaborative projects. In each case phytosanitation certificates were obtained from the Nigerian Plant Quarantine Service together with import permits from the quarantine service of the recipient country. Plants sent across national barriers are supplied as axenic tissue cultures in the form of proliferating cultures of rooted plantlets. Material distributed within Nigeria was supplied as two month old nursery plants ready for field establishment. However, when recipients have access to nursery facilities PBIP prefers to supply rooted tissue culture plants in order to reduce logistics of collecting the material and maximize utilization of our own facilities. A total of 7,800 plants were distributed during 1994 while over 11,500 were multiplied for experimentation and distribution during 1995.Around 80 plants from 16 diverse genotypes were multi plied for studies concerning the development of a cryopreservation protocol at the University of Reading during 1994 (see Section 6.5). The following genotypes were involved : plantains (Obino I'Ewai, Agbagba, Ubok Iba), cooking bananas (Cardaba, Bluggoe, FHlA 3), dessert bananas (Valery, FHlA I, FHlA 2, Yangambi km 5), wild bananas (Calcutta 4), lIT A plantain hybrids (TMPx 54S-S, TMPx 2796-5, TMPx 1112-1) and I1TA cooking banana hybrids (TMBx 612-74, TMBx 137S)Five plants of the banana accession Ukom were supplied to KUL in early 1995 for germplasm conservation purposes.Around 300 plants from twelve genotypes of three distinct families were multiplied for detailed investigation at the University of Reading during 1994 and 1995 (see Section 5.6.3). A tetraploid plantain hybrid (TMPx 1112-1), a tetraploid banana hybrid (TMBx 137S) and a secondary triploid family (l510S) together with their parental genotypes were challenged with a variety of nematode species from three different genera. The plantain hybrid was studied together with its parental genotypes (Agbagba 'French Reversion', Calcutta 4). Similarly, the banana hybrid was compared with its parental genotypes (Fougamou, M balbisiana). While the secondary triploid family (151 OS-I, 15108-2, 15108-6) was studied along with its parental genotypes (SH3362, TMPx 4479-1) and the parental genotypes of the TMPx hybrid (Bobby Tannap, Calcutta 4).Around 400 plants were multiplied for experimentation at the University of Florida during 1994 (see Section 5.5.1). lIT A hybrids and parental genotypes were challenged under glasshouse conditions with a variety of isolates of Fusarium spp., the causal agent of Panama disease. The following genotypes were involved: TMBx 612-74 'field true-to-type', TMBx 612-74 Onne, TMBx 1378, TMPx 1658-4, Bluggoe, Fougamou and Calcutta 4.Over 500 plants from ten diverse genotypes were multiplied for transformation studies at Texas A&M University during 1995. The genotypes involved were: wild bananas (Calcutta 4, M balbisiana), plantain landraces (Agbagba), cooking banana cultivars (Bluggoe), IIT A plantain hybrids (TMPx 548-9, TMPx 2796-5), and East African Highland bananas (Nakitengwa, Mbwazirome, Igisahira gisanzwe, Igitsiri).Around 20 plants from four diverse Musa genotypes were multiplied for use in tests of an in situ hybridization protocol for MUM at the University of Birmingham during 1995 (see Section 6.7). The accessions used were Calcutta 4 (AA), Mbalbisiansa (8B), Kisubi (AS) and Kamaramasenge (AS).Around 90 plants from 30 plantain genotypes were multiplied in order to test the efficiency of molecular genetic fingerprint techniques at the University of Birmingham during 1995 (see Sections 6.6 and 6.8). It is proposed that rapid DNA extraction systems should be combined with PCR-based analysis for the characterizatic;>n of MUM germplasm collections across the world. In this way the true level of diversity held in different collections can be determined leading to improved management and conservation of MUM genetic resources.Around 100 plants from 20 genotypes were multiplied for studies concerning the development of antiserum and PCR-based diagnostic tests for BSV at the John Innes Centre (nC, UK) during 1994 and 1995 (see Section 6.4). The genotypes involved included the TMPx hybrids and a number of reference hybrids, landraces and cultivars.Germplasm has also been multiplied at Onne Station to support the collaborative research activities of scientists based in other liT A programs, divisions and stations.Germplasm was supplied to ESARC for pollination blocks, germpJasm evaluation, MET-3 and for studies ofmechani~ms ofbJack sigatoka resistance (see Section 4) New pollination blocks: Around 150 plants were supplied to support the expansion of the ESARC breeding programme during 1994 and 1995 (see Section 4.4). The following genotypes were involved: Cardaba, Fougamou, TMB2x 1297-3, TMB2x 5265-1, TMB2x 8848-1, TMB2x 5105-1, TMB2x 6142-1 , TMB~x 7197-1 , TMB2x 8075-7, TMB2x 9128-3 . Germplasm supplied to PHMD was for early screening for resistance to Fusarium wilt, analysis of black and yellow sigatoka attack on plantain hybrids, assessment offield damage and yield loss due to nematode attack at OMe, BSV indexing and experimentation, assessment of microbial contamination of Musa seed.Early screening for resistance to Fusarium wilt: More than 150 plants from 30 genotypes were multiplied fOT Fusarium screening experiments during early 1995. Seedlings of plantain landraces and hybrids were challenged with Fusarium spp.under nursery conditions at OMe. The genotypes involved were the same as those used for investigations ofblack sigatoka resistance mechanisms (see Table 5.3 of PBIP 1993 Annual Report).Analysis of black and yellow sigatoka attack of plantain hybrids: Over 300 plants from twelve genotypes were multiplied in order to establish a field experiment at Onne Station in rnid-1995 . This study will assess the relative resistance of plantain hybrids to the two classes of sigatoka. IITA hybrids (15108-1, 14280, 8075-7, 8084-2 ) will be compared with their parental genotypes (SH3362, TMPx 548-9, \\01 4479-], Calcutta 4. Bobby Tannap, Obino l'Ewai) and contrasted with a plantain landrace (Agbagba) and a banana cultivar (Valery).Assessment offield dame\", and yield loss due to nematode attack at Onne: Over 600 plants of ] 5 genotypes were muhiplied for detailed field analysis of the effects of nematode damage on root development and yield. The genotypes to be studied are as follows: Asscasmegt ofmjcrobjal contamination of Mum seed: During 1994 around 500 seeds from 4\"-4,, crosses together with around S()() seeds from self-pollinations of TMPx hybrids and Calcutta 4 were sent to the Seed Health Unit at lIT A, !badan for assesamml of the microbial contamination within and on the surface of these seeds.About 400 plants ofTMPx 2796-5 were mUltiplied for root system studies at the UTA Humid Forest Station, Cameroon during 1994.A large number of plants were also multiplied to support the breeding activities at Onne Station.Over 300 plants were multiplied to replace dead or diseased plants in the germplasm collections and experimental fields across Onne Station during 1994 and early 1995.More than 300 plants ofthe following genotypes were used to establish new pollination blocks in early 1994: Fougamou, TMPx 1112-1, TMB\" 1378, TMBx 612-74 'field true-to-tvpe', TMBx 612-74 Onne, TMB\" 612-74 KUL . A further 300 plants were multiplied for establishing new pollination blocks in mid-1995 : TMPx 4479-1, SH 3362 2x, SH 3362 4x, Bluggoe, lkimaga, Ingoromoka, Intarna, Kibungo.Around 1,000 plants were multiplied from six distinct families ofunselected secondary triploid hybrids during early 1995. In addition, a further 250 plants were multiplied of the relevant parental tetraploid hybrid genotypes together with the respective grandparental genotypes (triploid plantain landraces and wild diploid bananas). Pedigree comparisons will be used for the development of optimum selection strategies including the use of marker assisted selection.Around 260 plants from 26 genotypes were multiplied for the PYT established during 1994 (see Section 3.4.1)Over 2,500 plants from 36 genotypes (plus guard plants) were multiplied for MET -3 experiments as monocrops in Onne, Ibadan, Abuja and also as an alley crop in Onne. All experiments will be established in the field during mid-I 995 (see Section 3.5.4).More than 300 plants from eleven diverse genotypes were multiplied for investigations of root system development under nursery and field conditions. The following genotypes will be studied throughout 1995 and 1996 plantain hybrids (TMPx 548-9, TMPx 1658-4), plantain landraces (Agbagba, Obino I'Ewai), cooking banana hybrids (FHIA 3), cooking banana cultivars (Cardaba, Fougamou), dessert bananas (Pi sang lilin, Yangambi km 5), wild bananas (Calcutta 4, Pisang lilin).There have been many reports that certain plantain landraces produce two or even three bunches per plant. However, there are no published reports concerning the basis of this phenomenon nor any details concerning its consistency through generations and across environments. One such genotype was recovered from the University of Nigeria at Nsukka for more detailed analysis. During 1994, ill vitro cultures were initiated from this genotype and 100 plants were multiplied.These will be established in the field at Onne Station in mid-1995 to determine the frequency of the double bunch phenotype. Molecular genetic analysis will then be carried out on plants with contrasting phenotypes.Over 600 plants of two plantain landraces (Agbagba, Bise Egome) were multiplied for investigations of somacJonal variation. This is a collaborative study with scientists at the Birmingham University (UK). These plants were used to establish and field experiment at Onne Station during early 1995. Freeze-dried leaf material will then be sent to Birmingham University for molecular genetic analysis (see Section 6.8).A corisiderable amount of material was also multiplied for distribution to public and private N ARS, especially in south-eastern Nigeria. Around 5,000 plants were multiplied for distributed during 1994 while a further 5,400 plants were multiplied for distribution during mid-I 995 (see Section 9.2). Low seed set and low seed viability are major constraints to Musa breeding. Axenic in vitro germination of hybrid seed has been a cornerstone of Musa breeding at lIT A and elsewhere. During 1994, 1,900 new hybrids were generated from the in vitro germination of over 9,000 embryos (Table 6.1) . This resulted in an average embryo gennination efficiency of 21 %, as compared to an average of 5% the previous year (see PBIP Annual Report 1993). There were at least two factors contributing to this increased level of efficiency. Firstly, more than 75% of the seed treated during 1994 was generated from 4x-2x crosses (see Section 32.2) .While seed from 4x-2x crosses accol.=.,ed for less than 10% of the seed treated during the previous year (see Section 3 ofPBIP 1993 Annual Report). Crosses between 4x and 2x genotypes (to produce putative secondary triploid hybrids) tend to have a higher number of viable seeds than other interploidy combinations. In addition, the duration from bunch harvest to seed extraction and in vitro germination was reduced to less than a week were possible. This considerably improved the efficiency of in vitro gennination of seed from al\\ crosses.Over 18,000 seeds were treated during 1994. However, in common with previous years, less than 50% of well fonned seed contained embryos. Thus, it was only possible to recover hybrid plants from around 10.5% of the seed (Table 6.1). This compares to an efficiency of2.4% the previous year.lIT A is committed to involving NARS in plantain and banana breeding at every level. In addition, there is clearly a tremendous selective advantage to carrying out early evaluation of new hybrids in a range of target environmental conditions. However, many NARS do not have access to tissue culture facilities. For this reason lIT A scientists are investigating new methods of improving natural seed germination protocols. Based on such protocols seed or seedlings of segregating families will be supplied to NARS for their own selection and subsequent evaluation.Station generated plants at a rate ofless than 1%. Whilst soil germination of seed produced from crossing wild bananas had achieved a modest 3% success rate (see Section 6 ofPBIP 1993 Annual Report) . Thus, further efforts were made to \\05 improve the efficiency with which seed could be germinated directly in soil . Initial experimentation was carried out under normal nursery conditions during the dry season oflate 1994. Over 4,000 seeds from 4x-2x crosses were placed into soil in polybags at a variety of durations after bunch harvest. A proportion of seed was pre-treated with a cold shock treatment and/or desiccation of various durations. A total of 129 plants were recovered from these seeds. Average germination rates of II % were achieved for seed placed into soil within one week of bunch harvest. This contrasted with average germination rates of 2% for seeds placed into soil more than one month after bunch harvest. Cold shock and desiccation pretreatments all had a negative effect upon germination rates. These observations may suggest that the embryos of seeds from 4x-2x crosses are fully mature upon fruit ripening anjl that they do not require a dormancy period before germination. Furthermore, it is clear that seed viability rapidly declines after fruit harvest. Subsequent more detailed experiments involving nearly 10,000 seeds were initiated during early 1995. Initial results support the above hypothesis. Subsequent experiments will focus on the application of rapid pre-treatments which might enhance embryo survival and seedling emergence. The results from these experiments will be reported in the PBIP 1995 Annual Report.Virus Diagnostics and EliminationBanana streak virus (BSY) has become a serious problem in plantain landraces and hybrids. Its occurrence in several African countries has serious implications for the safe distribution of improved hybrid germplasm. For these reasons, lIT A scientists have been collaborating with scientists at the John Innes Centre (TIC, Norwich, UK) and the University of Minnesota (USA) towards the development of precise and accurate diagnostic tools which may be used to identifY tissue culture stocks harbouring BSV. During 1994, lITA received substantial funds from the World Bank to expand activities in this area of research (see Appendix 4). There are two main purposes for this project: (i) to develop improved diagnostic tools for the precise identification of all known forms of BSV, and (ii) to use these tools in order to develop reliable protocols for the elimination ofBSV from MuSQ germplasm. This project will also study the interactions between host plant, insect vectors and the virus itself with the aim of identifying or developing BSV resistant germplasm.The results from initial experimentation are reported below. However, many of these observations await confirmation through stringent testing of plants grown under isolated conditions. To facilitate this type of work, the World bank has funded the construction of an insect-proof screenhouse at Onne Station which will be dedicated to BSV experimentation. The res).llts of confirmatory experiments using this new facility combined with new diagnostic tools will be reported in the PBIP 1995 Annual Report.Initial observations suggest that BSV is transmitted through suckers as well as in vitro germination and natural germination of seed in soil. Further studies are required to confirm that BSV is indeed readily transmitted through both sexual and vegetative propagation.BSV does not appear to be mechanically transmitted. However, there is reason to believe that it is transmitted by insect vectors. Although mealy bugs have been implicated in this role and aphids have been discounted, no conclusive experimentation has yet been reported in this area.Since BSV transmission may not be 100\"10 efficient, initial experimentation focused upon the selection of p1artts in which virus particles could not be detected. More recently, low temperature (22°C) growing conditions have been shown to increase symptom expression. Over 250 plants from 50 plantain and banana hybrid and landrace genotypes have been supplied to liT A virologists for prolonged observation and testing under these conditions. In vitro cultures have been initiated from plants which have passed through this initial phytosanitary check. Plants which have been multiplied from these tissue culture stocks will be retested with stringent diagnostic tests. When these derived stocks have successfully passed through further prolonged observation and retesting they may be offered for international distribution.Under field conditions the symptoms ofBSV infection may only be observed in a proportion of plants and frequently 'only during the rainy season. The basis of symptom expression is not clear but is being studied by IIT A scientists. Clearly, the identification• of BSV infected plants through the assessment of symptom expression is extremely difficult. Furthermore, current diagnr\";~ tAAts can not guarantee the detection of extremely low virus titres. However, plants from certain tissue culture stocks of TMPx 4698-1 consistently express virus-like symptoms at the seedling stage regardless of environmental conditions. For this reason, BSV studies at anne Station have focused on this accession.A number of therapeutic approaches have been evaluated for their potential to eliminate BSV from tissue culture stocks. There are many reports describing the use of chemotherapy to eliminate viruses from plant germplasm. One of the most effective compounds is Ribavirin (I Error! Reference source not foond.-Dribofuranosil-l-H-l,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide). Tissue culture plants of the infected TMPx 4698-1 stocks were grown on standard medium supplemented with a range of concentrations ofRibavirin. In this way it was possible to determine the level at which Ribavirin is phytotoxic in Musa. Unfortunately, a proportion of plants which survived this treatment were observed to express typical virus-like symptoms. All plants are currently being tested for the presence ofBSV through immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM). Further experiments will be carried out using this treatment coupled with the use of a new diagnostic analysis of plants grown under isolated conditions.Other chemotherapeutic treatments will also be tested. Current characterization ofBSV suggests that it has a double stranded DNA genome.More recent analysis confirms that it is a para-retrovirus belonging to the subgroup of bacilliform badnaviruses. It may be that the nucleic acid replication cycle ofBSV is similar to that of the related para-retrovirus cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMY).Studies of CaMV suggest that the viral dsDNA is processed in the host plant . nucleus and transcribed to RNA which is then passed to the host cytoplasm where it is reverse transcribed into DNA. This infers that the reverse transcriptase enzyme is crucial to its replication. For this reason, inhibitors of reverse transcriptase (such as ammonium 21-tungstate-9-antomonate) will be assessed for their potential to eliminate BSV from tissue culture plants. An advantage of this approach is that higher plants do not possess the reverse transcriptase enzyme. This may mean that inhibitors of this enzyme will not be phytotoxic to the host plant.The use of thermotherapy has also been reported as a means of eliminating viruses from certain plant species. However, high temperature treatment has been reported to be ineffective against a closely related virus of sugarcane. Experiments have been initiated to confirm whether or not this technique has any effect upon BSY The in vitro culture of small regions of meristematic tissue has also been reported as a method of eliminating certain viruses. For this reason a number of experiments were carried out to determine the minimum size and appropriate orientation for microsections of meristems from plantain suckers and in vitro plantlets.The mutagenic effect of various therapeutic techniques will also be assessed. It may be necessary to combine various contrasting treatments at low intensity in order to minimize these effects while effectively eliminating BSV.There is a very high level of genomic diversity between BSV isolated from different locations across the world. This has proved particularly troublesome to the development of a highly precise diagnostic test. Around 100 plants of 20 genotypes were supplied to collaborative scientists at HC together with a large amount of symptomatic leaf tissue and suckers from symptomatic field plants. Using this material HC scientists are testing a number of techniques which may eventually be developed into suitable diagnostic tools. JIC scientists have cloned and partially sequenced the BSV genome. This sequence data confirms that BSV is a badnavirus and suggests that it is distantly related to sugarcane badnavirus.There is clearly an immediate need for a precise routine test to detect BSV in liT A improved hybrids. Thus, He scientists are also focusing on the development of a molecular genetic test which would adequately detect BSV in the infected TMPx 4698-1 stocks. This will then be used to test the efficiency of various therapeutic methods (as discussed above).Gennplasm Conservation and Cryopreservation lIT A Onne Station has a field germplasm collection of over 400 accessions.Around 110 West Africa plantains and over 300 selected plantain hybrids are also held in an in vitro collection. The maintenance of these collections is highly labour intensive. For this reason liT A scientists have been investigating the potential of low temperature in vitro conservation systems. The Onne Station tissue culture growth rooms are currently held at 22-2SoC . Under these conditions each accession must be sub-cultured once a month.In the PBIP 1993 Annual Report (Section 6.6) we reported attempts to regenerate cell suspension cultures in collaboration with scientists at KUL.Following continued efforts in this direction the protocol remains limited to a narrow range of genotypes. Cell suspension culture promised to be useful for bothMusa transformation and cryopreservation. However, utilization of cell suspensions in these activities awaits the development of a routine regeneration protocol applicable to a wide range of genotypes. Meanwhile, alternative systems are being investigated. Agrobacterium mediated Musa transformation has been reponed by scientists at Texas A&M University (USA). Following these reports, over SOO plants of 10 diverseMusa genotypes (IITA plantain and banana landraces) were supplied for experiments to expand these transformation studies.In panicular, efforts are being made to transform West African plantains and East Afiican highland bananas.With respect to cryopreservation studies the emphasis has now been focused upon the use of encapsulated meristems. This technique appears to be appropriate to a wide range of genotypes and regeneration is straightforward.Thus, in collaboration with scientists at Reading University (UK) studies have beeIl initiated towards the development of a routine method for the cryoprescrvation of Musa germplasm. Sixteen diverse genotypes from Onne Station have been established at Reading University. Current experimentation involves the encapsulation of meristematic tissue followed by controlled freezing prior to long term storage in liquid nitrogen. Similar studies have also beeIl carried out at KUL. It is proposed that a three way collaboration between liT A, Reading University and KUL will be formed in this area during 1995During 1994 and early 1995 a molecular genetics laboratory was established at Onne Station which will become fully operational during mid-l 995 . This new facility was partially funded by complimentary funds from ODA (see Section 6.8) and will allow more efficient collaboration with leading molecular genetics labs. in Europe and USA. In addition, it will facilitate studies of current breeding populations which have not been previously possible. Only through a close integration between molecular genetic analysis and field based selection will it be possible to determine the potential of these new techniques to enhance the efficiency of the current breeding prograntme. Molecular genetic analysis based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) appears to have limited application in Musa. This is due to the low number of polymorphic loci which can be detected using this technique. In addition, the common use of radioactive probes in this technique would not be appropriate to the set-up at Onne Station. For these reasons, analysis will focus on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which appears to more readily detect molecular genetic diversity. DNA extraction and PCR-based analysis systems are now operational.PCR primers are being generated from Musa microsatellite sequences in collaboration with USDAIARS (USA). While informative random primers are being selected in collaboration with the Birmingham University. Initial studies will focus on two main areas: (i) germplasm characterization and definition of heterotic groups to maximise hybrid vigour, and (ii) marker assisted selection of those characters which are difficult to score or expressed late in the growth season. Plantain and banana phenotypes are poor indicators of genetic constitution which severely restricts the development of a reliable breeding scheme. In particular, it hinders attempts to maximize heterosis, since we are currently unable to reliably predict the specific combining ability of parental genotypes. Hybrid vigour is likely to be a crucial basis for future advances in yield, as it has proven to be for many other food crops. Through molecular genotyping it should be possible to estimate the level of useful variation which is directly or indirectly available to the Musa breeder. Comparative analysis of molecular genetic data and phenotypic data of established hybrids will facilitate the definition of specific heterotic groups within the Musa genus.Molecular genetic analysis may also locate duplicate accessions in the lIT A germplasm collections and identifY a core collection representing the extent of the presently available diversity. This will result in improved conservation and management of Musa genetic resources. These techniques will also be used to test putative theories of Musa taxonomy, phylogeny and genetic behaviour (see Section 2). Such information will be of crucial importance to the development of efficient breeding strategies.liT A scientists will evaluate the potential advantage of integrating molecular genotyping over conventional phenotypic assessment and selection. From this analysis it will be possible to define the scope with which marker assisted selection can be effectively applied to specific characters in Musa breeding. Furthermore, this will be assessed in terms of the improved selective power and efficiency in relation to the relative costs involved.Preliminary studies have used microsat. ellite primers to screen a diverse set of Musa accessions and segregating plantain hybrid populations. A high proportion of these primers have detected polymorphic loci in both germplasm collections and hybrid populations. This suggests that micro satellite primers will be extremely useful tools for characterizing Musa germplasm and for distinguishing full-sib hybrids with contrasting phenotypes. The results of these studies will be reported in the PBIP 1995 Annual Report. III 6.7The manipulation of chromosome number and constitution is one of the most important methods available to plant breeders for introducing novel variation into breeding populations. Indeed, the development of characterized aneuploids in wheat, for example, has proved invaluable not only to the breeding of this crop but also to fundamental studies of gene action in trait expression. The use of such genetic stocks can also facilitate the linking of molecular markers with their physical position on chromosomes. The generation of this type of information is likely to become a crucial step in future efforts precisely to direct genome manipulation through modem molecular genetic techniques.In Musa, we have noticed that during production of hybrids, after 3x-2x crosses, a proportion of progeny exhibit phenotypes consistent with aneuploidy. The proportion of such aberrant types varies considerably with different parental combinations. However, only in the context of a large scale crossing programme is it feasible to generate a substantial number of such plants. Nevertheless, this is still likely to be a long-term endeavour in Musa, as compared with seed crop species. Yet the presence of well characterized stable genetic stocks in Musa will be a considerable resource for basic and applied genetic research at nT A, African NARS and leading laboratories in Europe and the USA.The first task has been to determine the frequency and level of chromosome additions or deletions in plants showing aberrant phenotypes. Initial studies suggest that secondary triploid hybrids with aberrant phenotypes are in fact euploid. While 3x-2x crosses aimed at the generation of tetraploid hybrids are more likely to produce true aneuploids. A number of diverse crossing blocks have been established to support this activity (see Section 3.2.1). From these parental combinations it is theoretically possible to generate hybrids which have lost either A or B genome chromosomes. Ongoing experiments will define which parental combinations generate an acceptable proportion of useful aneuploids. Subsequently, investigations will determine whether or not the precision of flowcytometric analysis can be optimized sufficiently to distinguish aneuploids of different chromosome compliments. If feasible, flow-cytometric analysis would facilitate the analysis of a much higher number of hybrids than conventional microscopy. The results from these preliminary studies will be reported in the PBJP 1995 Annual Report.In collaboration with scientists at the nc it is proposed that monosomic and nullisomic aneuploid genotypes will be analyzed through in situ hybridization.In collaboration with molecular mapping studies (see Section 6.6) it will be possible to .... _ ....... ,\"'*'IDe IIId ......... 0& ..... : .. ,,, ptobei OIl wbictI to base subtcqueal pbysicII iiiipjiiDg Ittutiee Around 20 plants Rom the AA, BB ... AS ICC \". mil have aIIo beeD lad to the UDivenity of BirmingJunn tor dewIoa!l!l!lllt IIId _de of m iIIliIII hybridization protocol for MIutJ. COIjIC*M,i\"'dly, Ittvtia lave beeD -md III Onne Station towards the development of. fbIl karyotype of MIutJ A IIId B genome chromosomes. Progress OIl these cytq; ittic: Ittidies wiD be reported ill the PBIP 1995 Annual Report.DNA FiDflel'Pl\"iiltiD& to detect Sowr.,.' Vuiua Somac10nal variation is a commoa pbmomenon of both in vitro and in viw> grown MIISQ plants. Certain genotypes are known to exhibit • high rate of aid! variation while others very rarely generate somednnal variants.A project was initiated ill 1994 to g_* mo1ecu1ar generic markers to specific mutations believed to have arisen through sonw:lonll VIriItion. This project is funded by Overseas Development Administration (ODA, UK), through the International PIanI Genetic Resources Institute (1PGRI. Italy). aod joiDs fiT A with scientists at Birmingham UnMnity (UK) .. Funds from this project have also partially funded the development of. oc:w moJec:u'er sm«ic:s IIboratory It CloneA IlWlJOer of moIeadac markers have beeD identified for Ipecitic: IberraDI phenotypes. It is now necessary to \\lie tbese mukers to screen a well cbanic:terized population. For thiS reason, over 600 plants of the r\"nt'iII cu1tivan Agbasba and Bise Egome were muJtiplied at Onne Station during 1994. During the multiplication of these two populations, JIIl'Cise records were kept It eadI subculture. From this it is possible to defiDe the heritage of each plant. O!dy ill this way will it possible to distinguish the following dasses of mutation: (i) similar aberrant phenotypes which arose from ODe mutltion and were IUbaequent1y multiplied through successive sub-aJltures, (Ii) similar aberrant phenotypes which arose independently due to the same lIlUtation ill the geootype, and (Iii) similar aberrant phenotypes which arose independently from ditfaent III\\ItIItions.Leaf samples will be collected from plaDts with aberrant and normal phenotypes and freeze-dried. These will then be sent to Birmingham UniveBity for molecular genetic analysis. This will a1Iow the testing of previously identified markers together with the generation offurther mukers to additional aberrant phenotypes.assessed for their ability consistently to detect somaclonal mutants in the Onne Station germplasm collection and hybrid populations. These markers may then be used to screen routinely for off-types in new breeding populations and during the multiplication of material for distribution. They may also be of value for identifying -which accessions in the germplasm collection are somaclonal variants of other accessions. In this way it may be possible to increase the efficiency of germplasm conservation and management and to eliminate unwanted somaclonal variants from breeding populations and material for distribution. TetTap\\oid plantam hybrids are mainly derived from wide crosses between wild diploid (AA) bananas and cultivated triploid plantain (AAB). The hybrid parems have diverse fruit characteristics which may affect the fruit quality. Therefore, research is required to assess the quality of the new hybrids in terms of acceptability to farmers, retailers and consumers. The main focus of research over the past three years has been to investigate fruit durability (shelflife, ripening, handling and storage aspects) and palatability (flavour, texture, response to cooking pr~ures) . The aim is to determine important quality parameters and to provide a quality profile on each of the new hybrids compared with the local plantain. It is intended that the most important profile data will be used to develop a rapid quality screening technique. The methodologies involve objective physicochemical measurements and sensory evaluation (taste panels). Additional studies are concerned with farmers' reaction to new germplasm, socio-economic evaluation of the new materials and product development.The data discussed in the following text is derived from MIISQ fruit obtained malDly from the MET-I and MET-2 at Onne from 1993 to early 1995.Physito-dlemical Evaluation of Mllsa Fruit QualityDry matter content (DMC) has become an important selection criterion during genetic improvement of perishable staple crops. DMC is particularly important when breeding strategies involve wide crosses and ploidy manipulation. Data from cassava have shown that in some cases increased yield associated with increased ploidy was caused by larger cells retaining more water rather than an increase in dry matter yidd. In tenus of quality, DMC is highly correlated with both cooking quality and for some crops, storage life. The pulp DMC of various genotypes was tested as the fruit ripened. The stases numbered 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 refer to peel colour stages (Table 7.1). Most of the fruit characteristics are presented as a function of ripening stases. This is because physical and quality measurements for this crop are highly dependent upon lIS harvest maturity and ripeness stage, which researchers should consider when comparing data sets.As fruit ripened from stage I to stage 9 the pulp DMC decreased (Table 7.2). This was caused by the increase in osmotic potential of the pulp and the consequent movement of water from the peel to the pulp. Osmotic potential of the pulp increases due to the hydrolysis of starch to sugar during ripening. Therefore, DMC measurements should indicate ripeness stage of fruit.In order to generate a reliable DMC average, data from stage 1 and stage.3 were pooled (Table 7.3). The plantain landraces, Obino l'Ewai and Bobby Tannap had the highest DMC at 36%, the plantain hybrids ranged from 31 % to 34% DMC, and Valery had the lowest DMC (23%). These observations suggest that there is a potential to discriminate genotypes by DMC, where higher DMC would imply better cooking quality. The point of most interest in terms of breeding quality was that hybrids showed a DMC closer to their plantain parent than to banana cultivars.Individual fruit size is important in terms of market acceptability. Consumers favour larger fruits and associate high quality with bunches which have 10-20 large fruits.Fruit dimensions were assessed during ripening. However, there were no significant changes in circumference and length over time (Table 7.4).Fruit weight was estimated using the second hand of each bunch. Fruit weight decreased with time after harvest (Table 7.4). This is assumed to be caused by water loss as the fruit desiccates and is correlated with ripening time. The faster the rate of weight loss, the shorter the ripening time.The cooking banana Bluggoe produced the heaviest fruit followed by the French plantain Obino l'Ewai. All the hybrids, except TMPx 582-4 and TMPx 2481, had a fruit weight in the range of 110-150 g. which was significantly less than the plantain parent Obino I'Ewai. The hybrids tended to have more fruits than Obino l'Ewai but a lower individual fruit weight. The dimensions of the cooking banana fruits were less attractive to consumers. Cardaba and Bluggoe had a higher fruit weight than the plantain landraces yet their shape may have make them less acceptable in the market. 1I6 7.2.3 Pulp and peel data Tables 7.5 to 7.9 provide information on the components of bunch weight. Pulp and peel data are normally presented as a ratio. However, due to the difficulties of comparing ratios the data sets are presented as peel weight (Table 7.6). pulp weight (Table 7.8) and their respective percentages of the whole fruit weight (Tables 7.7 and 7.9). The changes in peel weight and peel percentage indicate the relative rates of water loss from this tissue. The peel percentage can be used to indicate the relative thickness of the peel. However, there is only a weak association between peel thickness and ripening time . Nonetheless, peel integrity plays an important role in water retention and protection from damage.Pulp weight increased with time until stage 7. Increasing pulp weight after harvest and the commensurate decrease in DMC was caused by changes in osmotic potential of the pulp relative to the peel during ripening. As sugars increased in the pulp, water was extracted from the peel. After stage 7 the decrease in pulp weight was associated with loss of peel integrity which accelerated water loss directly to the atmosphere. After stage 7 Musa fruit desiccated rapidly, the peel became brown and fruit quality fell dramatically.As a direct measure of yield, the pulp percentage values are easier to compare than pulp : peel ratios. This provides an idea of edible yield . Ten percent of the total bunch weight was subtracted since this was the approximate weight of the peduncle of plantain and banana bunches. After deducting this value from the bunch weight, the edible weight was a product of plant density x growth cycle x bunc!: weight x pulp percentage.Several of the plantains hybrids had similar percentages of pulp to those of the r lantain land races. As expected the cooking banana hybrid had a significantly lower percentage of pulp than both the plantain landraces and hybrids. This sug.~ests a significant parental effect on progeny fruit characteristics.A penetrometer was used to provide an objective method of determining the If. :xture or hardness of fruit. In this way the peel and pulp hardness were tested over the ripening period (Table 7.10). After stage 5 the hardness of the peel decreased dramatically. Significant clonal differences for peel hardness were observed when fruits were evaluated at stages 7 and 9. However, the data set appeared somewhat erratic. This may suggest that this test requires further optimization prior to the generation of conclusive data . Nonetheless, clones showed significantly different pulp hardness (Table 7.11). With the exception of Obi no l'Ewai the plantain landraces had a significantly harder texture than the other clones. Pelipita, a cooking banana, had a high initial fruit hardness and this may be due to the high fruit DMC.FHIA-l and FHIA-3 had lower fruit pulp hardness at all stages as compared with the other clones. However, FHIA-4 had a pulp hardness comparable with that of both the lIT A hybrids and the plantain landraces. This is likely to be due to the parentage ofFHIA-4. FHIA-l and FHIA-3 are banana hybrids whereas FHIA-4 is a plantain hybrid. Pulp hardness, as measured by the penetrometer, at stage 7 and stage 9 is shown in Table 7.12. These observations are from the fully ripe stages. At these stages the plantain landraces are significantly, harder than the lIT A hybrids, cooking bananas and FHIA hybrids, except FHIA-4 . Peel decreased in thickness with stage of ripeness (Table 7.13). However trends within stages were not apparent.In the MET-2 at Onne, the fruits of the plantain Bobby Tannap were significantly harder than those of the plantain hybrids but the plantain Obino l'Ewai had lower fruit hardness at stages 1 and 3 than the hybrids (Table 7.14). As expected the cooking banana hybrid and the dessert banana Valery had lower fruit hardness than the plantain hybrids and the landraces.When the fruit showed clear signs of ripening the rate of pulp softening was slower in the landraces than in the hybrids. Fruits of the plantain hybrids were significantly softer than the landraces (Table 7.15). This is an important faCtor because plantain fruits are eaten when green and unripe and also when fully ripe.Differences in the pulp texture may not be so apparent when boiling unripe fruits but when the fruit ripens the differences will be more apparent to the consumers. At the ripe stage the fruit is fried and if the pulp is too soft the fried chip/slice will either lose texture, absorb more oil or, in the worst case, the fruit will disintegrate during the frying process. The rapid loss of pulp texture exhibited by the plantain hybrids suggests that the parental banana genotype has a stong influence in the hybrid genome. Whilst this difference in quality may be of some concern, it is not yet known how a small but detectable difference in texture will influence market demand. Although the paternal Calcutta 4 genotype may confer many good traits to the progeny (e.g. black sigatoka resistance, short cycle and small plant stature) it has a negative effect on tiuit quality. Consequently, improvement of the diploid parental population is necessary in order to reduce or eliminate the differences between plantain hybrids and landraces. liB 7.2.5 Fruit ripening Ripening was assessed by randomly selecting individual fruits from the second and third hands of each bunch. The bunches were harvested when fruits were fully mature and taken immediately to the laboratory where the fruits were cut prior to selection. Temperature in the experimental area was maintained at approximately 25 0 C and was vented every 2 hours to prevent build up of ethylene. The ripening period was measured in terms of changes in the peel colour over time (Table 7.1). The duration from harvest for fruit to reach each stage of fruit ripeness is shown in Table 7.16, and rankings days to full ripeness (stage 10) for the different materials are given in Table 7.17.Although plantain fruit may be sold at all stages of ripeness tbese data provide an idea of market life. Fruit ripening period is of considerable commercial interest to farmers, retailers and the consumer. For this reason the ripening period of the hybrid should be consistent with that of the parental plantain genotype. The fruits of the hybrids had a significantly longer ripening period than those of the cooking bananas and more importantly had a longer ripening period than those of the plantain 1andraces used as female parents. These observations were consistent with previous studies (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report).Fruit ripening studies were also conducted on entire bunches. The coefficient of variation values (Table 7.18) suggest that the researcher should avoid collecting data from the first hand in this type of assessment. Coefficients of variation, although high, were stable after the second hand.Fruits ofPelipita had the longest ripening time which was consistent with previous observations (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report). Fruits of the other cooking bananas (Fougamou and Bluggoe) ripened rapidly across the bunch as did the banana Pisang Berlin. Generally fruits ofIIT A hybrids showed a similar ripening pattern to the plantain landra<::es, although one hybrid(TMPx 2637-49) was relatively faster ripening that the others. FHIA hybrids included in this study were slightly faster ripening than the IITA hybrids, with the exception ofTMPx2637-49 Data concerning the fruit ripening of a larger sample ofFHIA hybrids when grown under Onne Station conditions are shown in Table 7.19. The mean fruit ripening period (7-8 days) was similar to that of Obino l'Ewai. FHIA-l IIId FHIA-4 had a significantly iongel' fruit ripening period than the other clones. However, there is a need to repeat this analysis with more replication before finn conclusions can be made.Analysis of pasting properties was conducted as a means to assess the potential cooking quality of Musa flour. Flour from all plantain hybrids exhibited a similar viscosity during cooking (Table 7.20). However, there were significant differences in viscosity between Agbagba and Bobby Tannap. Agbagba had a significantly higher viscosity across temperatures than Bobby Tannap. The cooking banana had unexpected low viscosity values. Pelipita, which had a high DMC (39-40%) would be expected to have a comparably high viscosity due to its increased level of starch.However, this was not the case indicating that more research is required to aScertain the properties of Musa starch. The time and temperatures of gelation were similar across all genotypes.Early investigations showed that the rate of ripening of plantain fruit was associated with the rate of weight loss. Therefore daily recordings of fruit weight loss were taken together with monitoring of fruit ripening by the changes in peel colour (Table 7.21). There was a sigmoidal relation between time and weight loss (Gompertz method). The rate factor from the linear analysis was used to compare clonal differences using analysis of variance and average linkage cluster analysis. There were. no clear differences when the values for the inflection point and asymptote were analyzed Pelipita, which had the longest ripening time, showed the lowest rate of weight loss whereas Calcutta 4, the fastest ripening accession, exhibited the highest rate of weight loss. However, Valery and Pisang Iilin, which had relatively high ripening periods, showed high rates of weight loss. This result may have been caused by the shape of the curve, i.e. the line was linear and did not fit a sigmoidal model which was applied to the data set. To avoid this analytical problem only the linear sections of the data sets should be considered which can then be correlated with ripening time.Clonf~s were clustered, through average linkage analysis, in two stable groups at th e 80% level (Table 7.22). Clones which remained ungrouped were those with very high (Calcutta 4) and very low (Pelipita) rates of weight loss.However, the overall grouping was not associated with a threshold rate of weight loss and was not well correlated with the number of days to ripening (stage 7).Colour change was also analysed using a Gompertz sigmoidal model and then grouped with average linkage cluster analysis. Clones were mainly assigned to 2 relatively stable groups at the 70\"10 level (Table 7.13) while Pelipita and Valery were ungrouped. The colour offruit from Valery might have been severely affected by black sigatoka. Fniits of Valery were often harvested before the bunch reached the full state of maturity because the plant was effectively dead due to its high level of susceptibility to this disease. Harvesting of these immature fruit could have had an effect on ripening and hence the ripening process was erratic. Most clones fell into group I and only Fougamou, Cardaba and Calcutta 4 were in group II. This group of clonc:,s ripened most rapidly, within 7 days from harvest, in this trial.The data shown in Table 7.24 were obtained from segregating plantain-banana hybrid populations. The data sets have not been statistically analysed due to the low number of replications. This information may provide the breeder with a rapid means to assess fiuit characteristics of the material at an early stage and could form the preliminary screen prior to a full physical quality screen. One of the problems encountered with penetrometer assessment of pulp hardness was the production of seeds through the open pollination of euploid hybrids. This explains the very high value for the diploid hybrid 9007-4. At Onne Station there is a high level ofpolJen due to the pollination blocks. For this reason seed production is not uncommon in both the hybrids and cooking bananas. Means of pollination may also affect the quality testing. Hence, those hybrids which are prone to seed set will not score well in both physical or sensory tests. The level of seed set of these genotypes in a environment with less pollen i.e. in the farmers field, is unknown at this time. However, It is clear that farmers and consumers will not be attracted to seed bearing fruit.Fruit Damqe and RipeninlAs part of the quality testing procedure fiuits were evaluated for their tolerance to damage. Although fruit damage often has little direct effect on price, the ripeness stage may have considerable effect on market value. Once fruit becomes over-ripe in the market, i.e. above stage 8, the value falls rapidly. Therefore, studies were undertaken to assess the effects of different types of damage on fruit ripening and also to determine whether there were any clonal differences in damage susceptibility. Damage treatments were applied to the mid-section of each fruit, on the flattest available surface.The area of abrasion was 25% of the peel surface. Peel was abraded with a scalpel blade without any dOWl1ward pressure so as not to affect the pulp tissue . Table 7. to an increased rate of weight loss, i.e. moisture loss from the damage region of the fruit (Table 7.26). It is likely that moisture stress then triggered the climacteric which caused accelerated ripening.Abrasion of the fruit at stage 1 caused the peel at the site of the damage to desiccate. This produces a leathery area of tissue which was highly resistant to the penetrometer, hence the high values for stage 1 (Table 7.27). The effect of abrasion on peel and pulp texture depended on the stage of ripeness when the damage was applied. At the unripe stage the fruit tissue desiccated to form an inedible portion of fruit . The fruit peel also fused to the pulp where a large corky area was formed. As the fruit ripened the pulp tended to bruise rather than to desiccate. Thus, when the fruit began to yellow the effect of abrasion on ripening diminished (Fig 7 .2).Although abrasion causes a reduction in ripening period this effect is . dependent upon environmental factors, i.e. temperature and particularly relative humidity (RH). At 50-/0 RH, the ripening period of abraded fruit was reduced by 40% as compared with the untreated control (Table 7.21). However, when the abraded fruit were held at 100010 RH there was no effect on ripening period. This information indicates that the physical damage caused by abrasion was not the cause of the fast ripening. This suggested that abrasion is a passive form of damage which increased the rate of water loss as RH was decreased from 100010. Hence abrasion increased fruit water stress which was the factor initiating the climacteric response and thereby causing premature ripening.A pendulum was used to provide an energy density of approximately 0.75 Newton metres (Nm) cm-2 at the point of impact. Impact damage increased the rate of ripening of Musa fruit but to a lesser degree than abrasion. When impact injury was applied, the ripening periods ofthe plantain hybrids at stage 1 and stage 4 were reduced by 25% and 20% respectively relative to the controls (Table 7.29). In contrast impact had no significant effect on the ripening of the plantain land races or the cooking banana Bluggoe. Although the ripening period of the plantain hybrids was reduced by impact, there was no effect on weight loss due to loss of moisture content (Table 7.30). Unlike abrasion, the impact damage became more pronounced when fruit started the ripening phase (Table 7.31). Hence, ripe fruit suffered more pulp damage by the impact treatment than unripe fruit. This is important in terms of transportation and storage. Clearly when unripe the packing process should take all measures to prevent abrasive injury and when ripe should aim to avoid impact and injuries arising from pressure.A known weight of 26 kg was applied to the fruits for two minutes to provide a quasicstatic loading damage. Quasi-static loading did not have any effect on ripening (Table 7.32).Incision damage was made with a scalpel blade. A 5 em long incision to a depth of I em was performed along the longitudinal axis of the fruits. Incision caused both pulp and peel damage. Incision increased the rate of weight loss in all genotypes tested (Table 7.33). As with abrasion damage, the increased rate of weight loss caused by the incision was concomitant with a reduced ripening period (Table 7.34).It was evident that the abrasion and incision treatments caused the most dramatic reductions in ripening period (Table 7.34). Abrasion reduced the fruit ripening time of the plantain hybrids by 50\"\";' to 60\"\";' as compared with a reduction of 10% to 20% in the plantain landraces. However, it was notable that even when damage '*Ised a reduction in the fruit ripening period, the damaged fruits of the hybrids still had a ripening period which was equivalent to those fruits of the undamaged landrace plantains. This was due to the longer ripening period of the untreated fruits of the plantain hybrids. Hence, the longer fruit ripening time of the hybrid plantain is an importot factor in the potential acceptance of this germpIasm by the farming and marketing communities. One factor which has caused problems with the introduction of coeking Iaananas is the rapid rate of ripening. However, liT A's-tJlack sig&tolca resistant plantain hybrids have a considerably longer ripening period than the local plantain landraces. This may enable the plantain hybrids to sustain fruit injury and yet still maintain a reasonably long fruit ripening period.Incision caused the greatest damage to the fruit pulp (Table 7.35) whereas abrasion caused the greatest reduction in ripening period (Fig 7 .3) and the highest rate of weight loss (Fig 7 .4).Sensory eValuation of Mllsa fruit qualityMusa breeding was initiated more than 75 years ago. However, untn recently hybrid genotypes have not been generated which combine improved yield traits wfri<:h could be tested on a large scale. Lack: of interest from the commercial sector in Mllsa hybrids resulted from the inability of breeding programs to provide hybrid matQrial with disease resistance but also with improved agronomic and fruit quality characteristics compared with available landrace cultivars. However developments in Musa research during the past ten years have overcome some of the problems in Musa breeding and in the last five years breeding programmes e.g. FHIA. and ITr A,have produced a number of advanced hybrids which are considered to have commercial prospects.Havi ng selected hybrids, based on disease resistance and yield, postharvest research aims to provide a means to differentiate the selected hybrids in terms of fruit quality and final product quality. Physical tests can provide an important range of information in terms of appearance, ripening, durability and calorific content. However the final consumer tests are concerned with the quality of the product when cooked using the traditional techniques. Hence to gain a balanced perspective of fruit quality the physical assessments must be combined with taste panel evaluations. Sensory tests are fairly straight forward for dessert bananas as the fruits are only eaten in one form, i.e. raw at the ripe stage. However, prior to comsumption, plantain is cooked according to a variety of recipes and procedures using fruit from all the different stages of ripeness. Therefore, the challenge to the plantain breeder is to develop high yielding clones with fruits having good quality when boiled green or when cooked in the ripe and fWIy ripe forms.Taste panels were carried out on three major forms of cooked product in order to test the quality of plantain hybrids and cooking bananas for West African consumers: (i) boiling unripe green fruits, (0) boiling a pounded dough of SO% unripeMusa and SO% cassava (known asftJftJ in Ghana), and (iii) frying alioes of ripe fruit (known as dodo in Nigeria). As fruits became available taste panels were conducted to provide the breeder with a I\"efaCnc.e matrix and this infurmation wu studied in more detail using taste panel qucstiOllll8ires.The philosophy behind the improvement of agronomic traits hu been to produce heavy bunches with big fruits. In terms of cookin8 quality it wu considered that producing a hybrid with a better eatina quality when UIias wide and exotic material was tmlikely. However, the DT A hybrids have been used to determine which factors consumers associate with quality and to deYelop a means to select the most acceptable hybrids based on thoae traits.Objective physiological measurements were complemented with subjective studies on fruit palatability which was determined using taste panels. These data provided information on important fruit quality characteristics for consumers and indicated potential for consumer acceptability. Taste panels at Onne Station were used for sensory evaluation of boiled unripe and fried ripe fruit. Criteria for testing included taste, colour, sweetness, texture and acceptability. Fruit samples were abo ranked for preference in order to compare 1andraces and hybrids. In addition, taste paneIa were carried out in Ghana at the Crops Resean:hlnstitute (Kumasi) for fitfit, and'itUniversity of Ghana-Legon (Kade Station) for boiled samples. Studies on matoolce and beer preparation will be made in Uganda when liT A hybrids are harvested. Taste panels consisted ofa pool of staff from Onne Statwn. These were conducted as fruit became available and each panel consisted of a minimum often people. During the season ofmaximurn harvest panelists were presented with ten bunches and asked to rank them for preference based on bunch weight and fruit size. Fruit quality tests were conducted on five genotypes and the tests were recorded on a test questionnaire. Panelists were initially presented with five cut fruits which they scored for preference. This test attempted to determine consumer preference for the fruit as sold in the market. Panelists were then presented with samples of the same clones which were prepared by boiling unripe fruit or frying ripe fruit. Tests had a duration ofapproximately 45 minutes.Boiling green unripe fruit Table 7.36 shows the results from taste panel comparisons of 36 Musa clones where fruits had been prepared as boiled sections. The preference for a genotype in each column was compared with that of another genotype in each row. The mean score was used to rank and analyze the overall preference for a clone in all comparisons.The most preferred fruits were those of the plantain landraces Ubok Iba (True Hom) and Agbagba (False Hom), followed by TMPx 2481, TMPx 7002-1, and Obino l'Ewai (French plantain from Nigeria). The ranking ofTMPxgenotypes higher than their materna1 Obino l'Ewai genotype was unexpected. However, this data set may have been biased by the method of analysis and missing values. Some clones which happened to be compared with other poorer quality clones attained a high mean. Conversely, those clones which were tested against higher quality fruit could attain only low values. Despite these obvious limitations there was still evidence of definite preferences. Clearly, the more times a clone was compared the more reliable the result became. The analysis of variance revealed significant clonal differences (Table 7.37). However there were wide bands of similar products due to high coefficient of variation. In terms of fruit quality this was in favour of the hybrids. The plantain landraces had a mean of75 ±12.5%. Hence all those clones which had a mean score of above 40% were not significantly different from the plantain landraces.FHIA-4 had a high score as compared to FHlA-l and the liT A hybridsTMPx 5511-2 and TMPx 582-4. This relates to differences in parental genotypes. 7.36 indicates the preference for each genotype IS compared with the others. For example, the first cell for Ubok Iba shows that when,Ubok Iba and Agbagba were compared, 60% of the panelists favoured Ubok Iba. This data set provide~ information on how individual clones performed against standard clones and other hybrids.The basis for clonal preference in Table 7.36 was explained in more detail by the descriptive analysis (Table 7.311). The quality of the fruit was assessed for colour, taste, sweetness, texture and overall acceptability. The panelists were first required to state whether the fruit sample was good or bad. They were then presented with a number of choices of possible factors underlying their quality assessment.The plantain cultivars were scored as having a very good colour quality. Their pulp had a dark yellow colour after cooking. Also, the panelists considered that TMP3x 14604-2, TMPx 5511-2 and FffiA-6 had very good colour quality. Poor fruit colour was exhibited by TMBx 612-74-offiype, TMPh 15108-6, FHIA-I, FHIA-2, FHIA-3, Tuu Gia and Valery. The colour was considered poor as these fruits were a light yellow or white.Taste scores indicated that the plantains were either ofvery good or good quality. The only other very good tasting fruit was that of TMPx 4479•1 . The hybrid 597-4, TMPx II 12-1, TMPx 6930-1 , TMPxI621-1, TMPx 5511-2, and TMPx 2637-49 had a good flavour. The remaining genotypes were considered to have a fair, poor or unacceptable flavour.Clones with soft fruit texture were the least favoured by the panelists. This indicates that the boiling process was able to break down the fruit structure. In traditional methods of cooking, fruits are boiled in a stew for up to one hour. Therefore, fruits should remain firm during cooking. lIT A plantain hybrids had fruits with the preferred firmness. TMBx 612-74 offiype was initially a cooking banana hybrid derived from a cross between Bluggoe and Calcutta 4. Fruits of Bluggoe had 5% to 6% less dry matter content than those of plantain landraces.This may reduce the boiling quality. Similarly, poor fruit quality was attributed to the des sen banana Valery, which rapidly broke down when boiled.The fruits of plantain landraces were scored as very good to good by the panelists. The fruit quality of the TMPx ranged from very good to fair and only TMP3x 151 OS-6 was considered poor. TMPxh l510S-6 and TMP3x l510S-2 are secondary triploids derived from the cross between an lIT A primary tetraploid (TMPx 4479-1) and a FHIA selected diploid (SH-3362). The fruits of the cooking bananas and the FHIA hybrids ranged between fair to poor. Boiled unripe fruits of the bananas Tuu Gia and Valery were considered poor to unacceptable.In addition to the poor colour and tissue softening during boiling, poor scores could also be associated with seed production in the fruit. Seeds are extremely rare in plantain landraces due to the high female sterility of the crop.Musa seeds are pea-sized, hard, black objects which distinctly reduce the perceived quality of fruit. Seed set may be a problem with the more fertile tetraploid plantain hybrids. It is uncertain how imponant seed set in tetraploid hybrids will be in the future . However, the generation of secondary triploid hybrids is likely to resolve this problem.The results from the sensory assessment were also analysed using correlation, regression, cluster and multivariate analyses to determine groupings based on fruit quality among the clones being tested.Of all the parameters colour was the least reliable as revealed by correlation analysis (Table 7.39). This was surprising since it was assumed that distinct fiuit colours would be easily detected by the panelists. The correlation value (0.7S3, N=36) was probably because the majority of the genotypes (i.e. the lITA hybrids) had a colour which was fairly close to the plantain landraces. All the other quality parameters had highly significant correlations with preference ranking.The linear relationships between preference ranking and the descriptive scores are shown in Figs. 7.5 to 7.9. Plantain landraces are near the origin and the banana landraces are at the opposite extreme.In addition to the assessments of fruit texture which the taste panelists . made, fruit hardness was measured by the penetrometer. If a significant correlation between fruit hardness and the panel scores for fruit texture could be established, this could result in the elimination of fruit texture assessment by the taste panel. This would save time for the taste panel and could provide a rapid test for the fruit quality profile.The average linkage cluster analysis, based on descriptive data, establish three stable groups at.the 75% level (Table 7.40). Only group II may be considered homogeneous since most bananas or their hybrids were in this cluster (Fig. 7.10). Also , principal component analysis did not distinguish any grouping based on taxonomic genomes or parentages.Comparisons of38 Musa genotypes whose ripe fruits were prepared as fiied sections are shown in Table 7.41 . The mean values (Table 7.42 The distinct separation of the plantain landraces from their hybrid genotypes showed the potential problem when breeding a crop which has multiple end-uses. A hybrid may be successfully adopted if this genotypes could perform well when cooked both unripe and ripe. The data suggested that the most critical test for cooked fruit was at the ripe stage since panelists were able to discriminate the higher quality of the plantain landraces. Fruits from banana hybrids and secondary triploids were unacceptable to the taste panel. This suggests that introgressing more banana genes into the hybrid populations may affect fruit quality. Therefore, the fruit quality ofthe parental diploid plantain population should be improved.The quality of unripe boiled fruits was assessed by researchers of the University of Ghana-Legon at Kade ARS . Results were similar to those obtained at Onne (Table 7.46). Boiled fruits of local plantains were the most preferred by the panelists, followed by those of the lIT A plantain hybrids, liT A cooking banana hybrid, the cooking banana Cardaba and FHIA-3 . Descriptive scores provided information for preference ranking (Table 7.47).Taste panels for Juju assessment were carried out by the Crops Research Institute at Kumasi. FuJu using fruits from the lIT A hybrids and the cooklng banana Cardaba were preferred to that cOoked with fruits from the local plantains (Table 7.411). FuJu was made from 50''!. plantain and 50\"10 cassava. This mixture provided a smooth dough-like paste. Plantain hybrids had good taste, texture and elasticity for Juju (Table 7.49). (Information provided by E.K.S. Ahie/cpor, University of Ghana, Katie ARS and Mr. K. Yeboah, Crops Research Institute, Kumasi, Gha\"a) COfIC/usion to taste panel data When taste panels are completed the data sets become more reliable and more stable rankings are recorded. This provides an overall assessment of fruit quality based on the information from the products tested e.g. unripe boiled fruit, ripe fried fruit andJuJu. Hence, taste panels provide a relatively simple method to select clones for further testing.The profile data At a later date when selections for national releases are considered the same fruit quality traits should be regarded as an important aspect for adoption. The best clones in terms of fruit quality would be those which are most acceptable in all fonns oflocal processing.Black Sigatoka and Fruit QualityIt has been established that black sigatoka has a significant effect on fruit maturation (i.e. the period between flowering and harvest). Sigatoka-infected plants have a shorter fruit filling period than fungicide-treated fruit (see PBIP 1992 Annual Report). Effects of sigatoka on fruit ripening remain unclear and this study aims to determine whether sigatoka also causes a reduction in ripening period and how sigatoka affects fruit quality characteristics and shelf-life.Plants of Agbagba (medium False Hom plantain), Mimi Abue (giant False Hom plantain), Obino I' Ewai (medium French plantain) and TMPx 5511-2 (plantain hybrid) are growing in fungicide-treated and non-treated plots in a completely randomized design with six replications each of five plants at Onne Station. All plots are surrounded by the susceptible banana cultivar Valery. The plant crop will be harvested during 1995.Plantain UtilizationHybrid plantains closely resemble but are not identical to their parental plantain genotypes. Hence, there is a need to compare the utilization characteristics of these hybrids with their parental genotypes in terms of product quality. Utilization studies have also proven very useful for extension services, especially with cooking bananas, which have been distributed by UTA since 1988 (see Section 9.7).Several methods of processing, utilization and storage life of plantain products were under investigation in 1994 and were exhibited at trade fairs, farmer's days.etc. This may promote the use of plantain and banana in improved or novel products.Plantain utilization may have an impact when selection is based on potential demand for a product. Utilization studies concentrated on three topics: baby weaning food, expanded snack foods, and wine production as these products were identified as having the most likelihood of commercial and social success.Musa flourlstarch for fructose production and the utilization of flour in drilling mud for petroleum extraction are also being considered for further investigations by PBIP's postharvest team.A project was set up in collaboration with the Grain Legume ImprovementProgram ofIlTA and UNICEF to develop a high quality cheap source of baby food using available products in the local markets. This project was based on earlier work developing baby foods by NIJiORT (Thadan, Nigeria). NrnORT has developed • SoyaMusa\", a blend of soybean and plantain flours .The plantain flour was replaced with cooking banana flour, which was cheaper than that of plantain. The ingredients/formulations (Table 7.50) were cooked through extrusion processing. Extrusion processing rapidly cooked the product at both high temperature and pressure. The resulting exudate was then ground into a free flowing flour . The advantages of extrusion cooking were speed, unifQrmity, hygiene and continuous feed processing rather than batch processing.The process also removed anti-nutritional factors such as the trypsin inhibitors present in uncooked soybeans. The final product was a highly uniform, odourless flour which absorbed water easily to prepare the weaning paste. Once the flour has been produced vitamins and milk powder could be added to produce a highly nutritious product.A good quality baby food should have a high water binding capacity to absorb water rapidly, good water dispersion to rapidly form a uniform paste and a low gelatinous concentration. The relative physical characteristics of the formulations tested are shown in Snack foods were also made using the extrusion process. A series of recipes were tested for physical and sensory characteristics. Physical properties of each formulation are shown in Table 7.53. The products varied significantly across panelists in two Nigerian locations (Table 7.54). There was a significant interaction between site and treatment for appearance, flavour and overall acceptability. A good quality product should have a low bulk density and a high water binding capacity. The extruded snack food had the advantage of being highly nutritious and had low fat as compared with most similar snack foods which were fried in oil. The products varied in quality (Table 7.55). The sensory evaluation of the snack foods identified \"821\" as the most acceptable formulation (Table 7.56).Over-ripe plantain pulp may be used for wine production. Standard brewing resulted in a wine with an alcohol content of about 7-8%. The wine was coloured, using food colouring agents, to produce a \"red wine\" . This cheap wine may be an alternative to the imported altar wine in West and Central Africa. Consequently, the flowering of PITA-l was delayed in the plant crop. In addition, the host response of both genotypes to the black sigatoka (BS) was evaluated in terms of the youngest leaf spotted (YLS).Early records (i.e plant height 4 MAP) showed that the BS resistant hybrid grew faster than the susceptible plantain landrace even under 0 NPK (Table 8.1).However, this early vigorous growth of PITA-I did not result in a higher plant height at flowering due to the pseudostem rotting of PIT A-I . The suckers, which became the \"new\" mother plant in the plant crop, took longer to flower than Agbagba, especially in the alley cropping plots without external synthetic fertilizer (Table 8.1)The high number of plants showing no apical dominance in terms of sucker development before the flowering of the mother plant was most severe in alley cropping fields . This may be a consequence of the farming system as well as the utilization of synthetic fertilizer. More suckers were produced in the control plots (farmer type management) than in the alley cropping plot which had no application ofNPK Similarly more suckers were produced in the alley cropping plots which had fertilizer applications than those which received no additional NPK (Table 8.1). Thus increased production of suckers may be a consequence of enhanced nitrogen fertilization. Indeed, nitrate has been extensively considered as a germination promoter in seed physiology experiments. Moreover, additional nitrate may be produced from the decaying residue of the mother plant.The production of significantly more suckers by the hybrid than the plantain landrace is likely to be the consequence of the genotype of each clone at the apical dominance (Ad) locus. Plantains have slow and poor sucker development because they are homozygous recessive (i.e. nulliplex) for this locus whereas the tetraploid hybrid has one copy of the dominant allele (i .e . simplex) . This gene was inherited in the hybrid from its diploid parent, the non-edible banana Calcutta 4 (see PBIP 1992Annual Report). The Ad gene regulates the production of gibberellic acid, a growth regulator which breaks dormancy and strongly influences sucker development .The increase in levels of synthetic fertilizer shortened the growth cycle, especially in the hybrid (Table 8.1) which responded linearly (R2 = 982%) to the application of NPK The growth of the landrace had a linear response to the application of the fertilizer (R2 = 99 .9%) but only in its early stage (4 MAP) The response of growth parameters of yield to increasing application of synthetic fertilizer followed a quadratic regression. However, this may be a statistical anomaly resulting from the limited number of three fertilizer treatments.Results from this experiment (Table 8.1) indicate that the host response to black sigatoka was only affected by the genotype but not affected by either farming system or the addition of synthetic fertilizer or mulch from the hedgerows.Moreover. the treatments did not have any significant effects on the bunch weight and other yield components in the landrace Agbagba ( Removal or emasculation of the male bud (debudding) may improve fruit size and qUality. In the tetraploid fertile hybrids this cultural practice may avoid seedset since the pollen source has been eliminated. Furthermore, debudding stops insect transmission ofMoko disease through dehiscing bracts.This experiment was set-up during 1993 in the multiplication plots of landraces and hybrids at Onne. Within the same plot, 30 plants of each genotype were chosen at random and 50% of them had their male bud emasculated. The peduncle was broken about IS cm below the last female hand. Data collection for the plant crop (hybrids) and ratoon (landraces) started in 1994. Statistical comparisons were made only within each cultivar but not across cultivars due to the experimental design.Male bud emasculation significantly affected bunch weight or its fruit traits in the plant crop of the ABB cooking banana Cardaba and its derived hybrid FHIA-3 (Table 8.3). FHIA-3 had heavier bunches with many large heavy fruits in those plants in which the male bud was removed. However, Cardaba plants with emasculated male buds showed only a significant increase in tiuit weight. This was concomitant with a significant decrease in number of hands, thereby diminishing significantly the total number offruits per bunch.The bunch weight was not significantly affected by the removal of the male bud in the plant crop of the French plantain landrace Obino I' Ewai and the French plantain hybrids (Table 8.3). Nevertheless, after male bud emasculation larger fruits were harvested in Obino I' Ewai and its offspring TMPx 4698-\\ ,and broader heavy fruits were obtained in TMPx 2796-5 and TMPx 4698-\\ (Table 8.3). This experiment shows the potential of male bud removal nQt only to avoid seed production in the tetraploid hybrids but also to improve their fruit quality.Fruit size appears to be an important quality trait as revealed by taste panel analysis The use of mulch as an organic fertilizer is a technique used throughout the world to promote and maintain soil fertil ity. However, the process of mulch production can range from intermediate use of organic material (as used in backyards) to more sophisticated techniques such as compo sting and sludge recovery. The technique being used in this experiment is composting. This method converts a combination of unpleasant high liquid kitchen wastes and cumbersome garden waste offcuts into an odourless, uniformly sized pre-digested soil conditioner .A 25 m x 4S m field was planted with in vitro propagules of Cardaba at a spacing of 3 m between rows and 2 m between plants within rows. The treatments were: 0 (control), 200, 400, 600, and 800 tonnes of mulch ha-I year-I Tile mulch application was sulHiivided into three equal measures and applied every four months to ensure that plants receive a constant covering of mulch throughout the year. The soil nutrient status in the experimental plots was measured at planting (Table 8.4). This will be repeated on an annual basis to record potential changes in soil fertility. Samples of tile mulch have also been sent for analysis.Based on plant height, a preliminary assessment of the treatment was made at six months after planting (6 MAP). Plots receiving mulch at rates of 400, 600 or 800 MT ha-I year I had significantly taller plants than those receiving 200 Mf ha-I year I or no mulch at all (Table 8.5). The early vigorous growth in plots mulched at a rate of at least 400 MT ha-I year I may result in higher yields. The likelihood for successful transfer of new agriculturaJ technologies to fanners is significantly improved when technologies are delivered as part of a sustainable farming system which considers appropriate access to the market. Moreover, farmers must be able to see a clear benefit of the new cultivars and/or other technology before they will consider adoption in their farming systems. The introduction ofimproved black sigatoka resistant gennplasm will be only effective if farmers provide a beneficial environment for plantain growth. Furthermore, the development of a cultivar profile (rate ofN-P-K fertilization, planting density; type of alley cropping, etc.) should be fine-tuned through on-farm testing (OFT) of the improved germplasm compared with a local cultivar. Two joint activities in southeastern Nigeria with Shell Plc.-Extension Services (Sections 8.5.2 and 8.5.3) were set up to address these issues. 8.5.2 Yield and qUality loss from black sigatoka Loss of plantain yield and fruit quality due to black sigatoka leaf spot have been assessed at UTA stations {see PBIP 1992 Annual Report). These plots are subject to high inputs of fertilizer and management practices and may not be fully representative ofreai farming situations. Further assessment of the host-pathogen interaction requires information from farmers plots to determine the effects of sigatoka disease on yield and fruit quality. Hence, on-farm yield loss assessment from sigatoka and evaluation of hybrid performance under farmer's conditions are the specific goals of the first set of off-station trials carried out by liT A in southeastern Nigeria.Agbagb .. and PITA-2 (TMPx 548,9), under fungicide and non-fungicide treatments, were grown in 38 backyards and 17 farms in Rivers State, Nigeria. Data collection (Tables 1.6 to 8.9) from the plant crop commenced in 1993 but ended in 1994 due to the high incidence of plants (both hybrid and landrace) showing virus-like symptoms. All plots were destroyed. Incomplete data collection does not allow a proper analysis of this experiment. Hence, preliminary results reported below should be taken with caution.AlI genotypes had more healthy standing leaves at flowering in the backyard than in the farmer's fields (Table 8.9). Bunches were heavier and had bigger fruits in the backyards than in the fields. PIT A-2 had higher yield than Agbagba in both backyard and farmer's fields even when fungicide was applied to Agbagba plots (Table 1 .9). This hybrid outyielded the locallandrace by 140% in backyards and 60\"10 in farmer's fields (Table 1.9). Fungicide treatment did not have a beneficial effect on the bunch weight of this hybrid. Fungicide-treated plots of Agbagba in farmer's field had 25% higher yields than the Agbagba control plot (Table 1.9).In 1995, a new set of trials in backyards and farms will be planted in southeastern Nigeria to determine the main components for farmer acceptanwrejection of new germplasm in this region of Nigeria. Black sigatoka resistant cooking bananas (Bluggoe, Cardaba, Pelipita) and dessert bananas (Yangambi km 5) will be compared with local plantain landraces (e.g. Mimi Abue), which will be provided by the farmers as checks. All the propagules of the resistant bananas were in vi/ro mllitiplied between late 1994 to early 1995 .In past yean, PBIP has strengthened its linkages with international, regional and national programs in sub-Saharan Africa and dsewhere. PBIP aims to strengthen NARS through : cooperative research, consultant support, individual degree wining, group training. visiting scientist scheme, transfer of improved MIIsa genetic material. and production packages together with the publication of production manuals, research guides and other training materials.9.2IITA shares germp1asm with partners in developed and devdoping countries under the agreement that this material will not be licensed for commercial purposes.Hence, plantain or banana hybrids developed at lIT A cannot be patented or registered for restricted release. Shoot-tip culture is used as a vehicle for the exchange of Musa gennplasm. A limited number of virus-indexed hybrid genotypes (in the form of proliferating shoot-tip cultures, rooted in vitro plants or nursery seedlings) will be available towards the end of 1995 following requests to PBIP. In 1994 a total of 5000 seedlings/suckers were distributed to NARS and NGOs in southeastern Nigeria. Also, more than 5400 seedlingS/suckers of the Bluggoe, Cardaba, Pelipita and Yangambi km 5 were multiplied for further distribution to public and private NARS in 1995.In 1994, lIT A started Cooking bananas were introduced from southeast Asia and, therefore, it was not surprising that West Africans preferred the appearance and taste of their traditional plantains. Consequently there has been a predictable slow rate or t'armer Idoption and market acceptance. However, extension services in Nigeria have persevered with the distribution of cooking bananas because of their high yield potential and the threat of black sigatoka. Reports from extension services in southeast Nigeria suggested that reactions to cooking bananas were mixed. In certain areas, IIU1Idy those which have had experience with cooking bananas for more than four to frye years, there is evidence that certain cultivars are being accepted. The major problem for farmers was to find a market in which to stU their produce. In areas which have rejected cooking bananas there was evidence that this may have been due to lack of information on how to process the cooking banana fruit or the absence of a high disease pressure from black sigatoka. This ~tudy was conducted to collate information on the yield performance, cooking quality and current market status of cooking banana in southeast Nigeria.Resistance to black sigatoka was defined as a function between the total number of standing leaves and the youngest leaf with black sigatoka spots at flowering. After flowering, leaf production ceases and the ability of the plant to fill the bunch is thereafter dependent on functional leaf &rea. Therefore closely related genotypes with a higher number of standing leaves without advanced symptoms of sigatoka tend to have higher potential yields. According to this system Agbagba and Obino l'Ewai were classified as susceptible, having 9 standing leaves with a youngest leaf spotted value of 5 at flowering (Table 9.1) . Bluggoe was classified as less susceptible, Cardaba and Pelipita as partially resistant to less susceptible and Fougamou as resistant to partially resistant. Calcutta 4 has been added to the data in Table 9.1 to show that highly resistant cultivars have no signs of advanced leaf spotting due to sigatoka.Triploid landrace cooking bananas were more resistant to black sigatoka than plantains and there was also a resistance range within the cooking bananas (Table 9.2). Cardaba, Pelipita and Fougamou were the most promising cultivars in terms of black sigatoka resistance.Due to the higher level of black sigatoka resistance, cooking bananas significantly (p< 0.05) outyielded Agbagba, producing a 2:3 fold increase in bunch weight (Table 9.2). All the cooking bananas also produced heavier bunches than Obino l'Ewai although this was only significant for Fougamou. Although the bunches of cooking bananas were larger than plantains, plantains are typically sold in terminal urban markets as individual fruits . Therefore fruit characteristics can be equally or more important with respect to market value than total bunch weight.The marketing preference in Nigeria is for large fruits which explains the higher demand for False Horn plantain which produce few, large fruits per bunch.Analysis of fruit number and weight separated the cultivars into four groups. Agbagba produced the lowest number of fruits, an average of 15 fruits per bunch but the largest fruits (P< 0.05) with a mean weight of approximately 300 g.The cooking banana Bluggoe produced the second largest fruits with ali average of 56 fruits per bunch and a mean fruit weight of approximately 200 g . Obino l'Ewai, Pelipita and Cardaba produced between 75-90 fruits per bunch with fruit weights of between 130g and 170 g . Fougamou produced the highest number of small fruits, (p< 0.05) weighing approximately 100 g. In the market, traders actively select for bunches with large fruits which indicates that Fougarnou would be an unsuitable candidate for widespread delivery to the farming/marketing sector.The fruit weights of the cooking bananas, Bluggoe, Cardaba and Pelipita were of approximately the same weight or heavier than fruits of Obino I'Ewai. This would suggest a possible market advantage for cooking bananas compared with French plantain. Unfortunately market value is further complicated by fruit shape.Plantain consumers in West Africa are conditioned to favour the overall appearance and dimensions of plantain fruit. Cooking bananas are typically shorter and fatter than plantain (Table 9.2). Although cooking banana fruit may be heavier than plantain, the different shape makes cooking bananas conspicuous in the market. This clear difference in shape makes cooking bananas less attractive to consumers which presently reduces their market value.Aoother important component of yield is the growth cycle, this is the time from planting until harvest and then from harvest to harvest of the subsequent ratoon crops. Analysis of growth cycle revealed that Cardaba, Bluggoe and F ougamou had an average of 400 days compared with approximately 460 days for Agbagba, Obino l'Ewai and Pelipita (Table 9.2). Therefore, Pelipita and the plantains produced fewer bunches per unit time than the other cooking bananas which would result in a reduced income for farmers.The cooking bananas Cardaba and Fougamou produced the highest total bunch weight, Cardaba and Bluggoe produced the largest fruit size and Cardaba, Bluggoe and F ougamou had the shortest crop cycle. Disregarding the current marketing bias .towards the familiar shape of the plantain fruit, the agronomic data set suggested that Cardaba and Bluggoe were the most promising cultivars.When introducing a new crop type to the market, disease resistance and higher yield may not be sufficient to attract traders and consumers. Having established that the cooking bananas were less desirable than local plantain landraces due to fruit dimensions, tests were conducted to assess the fruit quality compared with plantain.Dry matter content is an important quality screening attribute as it can be measured routinely and is highly correlated with cooking quality and often ripening period. Dry matter is also important when comparing genotypes in order to assess whether a given bunch weight is due to a real difference in yield or simply a difference in cell water retention. Pelipita had a dry matter content of 43% which was significantly higher (P< 0.05) than that of plantain (Table 9.3). The plantain cultivars had a similar dry matter content to Fougamou (36-38%) which was significantly higher (P< 0.05) than those ofBluggoe and Cardaba. Cooking quality is also associated with starch content and despite the clear range in dry rnauer contents between cultivars there were no significant differences in starch content (Table 9.3) Crop harvest is the product of yield, plant density and bunch weight but this does not consider the food value. For Musa, food value is related to pulp content which is considerably reduced after the peel has been removed. Differences in cultivar food value is usually established by comparing the pulp:peeI ratio. However this is a difficult measurement to use for rapid comparison, hence the data are represented as percentage of pulp. Fougamou had a significantly bigher food value (P< 0.05) than the other cultivars with nearly 70\"10 of the fruit being pulp . The plantains and Cardaba had 62% to 63% pulp whereas Bluggoe and Pelipita had a significantly lower (P< 0.05), 57% to 58% pulp . The lower pulp content (4-5%) ofPelipita and Bluggoe compared with the plantain represents a considerable reduction in food value indicating the importance of this parameter in terms of yield comparison.Fruit ripening period was measured to determine the potential marketing period (PMP). Pelipita had a PMP of 18 days from harvest until the fruit reached peel colour stage seven. This time period was significantly longer (P< 0.05), than the other cultivars (seven days longer than Agbagba and at least ten days longer than the other cooking bananas). This extended marketing period may be useful in ripening studies or for marketing fruit regions where produce is transported over long distances or difficult road systems with limited transport facilities. The plantain cultivar Obi no l'Ewai had a marketing period of approximately eight days which was one or two days longer than the other cooking bananas. As Obino l'Ewai is accepted in the marketing system then it is likely that the slightly shorter marketing period of the cooking bananas would be acceptable for transportation and rapid urban marketing.The physico-chemical tests generated information on the plantains which provides a benchmark for fruit quality. The cooking banana Pelipita had a significantly higher dry matter content and longer ripening period (P< 0.05), than the plantains but had a poor percentage ofpu!p. Fougamou had a dry matter content comparable with the plantain and a high percentage of pulp but had the lowest ripening period. Cardaba and B1uggoe had a poor dry matter content, low ripening period and Bluggoe also had a low percentage of pulp. However the tests indicated that the cultivars Pelipita and Fougamou were the most promising cultivars.In 1992 more detailed tests of processing qualities of a range of Musa genotypes were initiated at Onne (see PBIP Annual Reports 1992 and1993). As part of these tests the food quality of the cooking banana culti'lars was compared with plantain.Simple food preparations were selected for the tests and food quality was assessed in terms of colour, flavour, texture and overall acceptability. Sensory analysis was carried out using taste panels because these parameters are difficult or impossible to measure reliably with a physical test.Plantain consistently scored better than the cooking banana. This was expected, as the panelists were familiar with plantain and unfamiliar with the appearance and taste of cooking bananas. However, it was of interest to ascertain whether the cooking banana fruit was considered acceptable and whether or not there was a range in the fruit quality of these cultivars. The scores for Valery a dessert banana were added to the results to provide the full range of response.In the sensory evaluation of boiled unripe fruit, colour data showed a quality scale from 'very good' to 'poor' which related to a colour scale from 'dark yellow/orange' sample to 'pale yellow' (Table 9.4). The plantains scored as 'very good' for colour, the cooking bananas 'fair' and Valery 'poor'. The plantains had a 'very good' flavour, Pelipita and Fougamou scored as 'acceptable' whereas Cardaba, Bluggoe and Valery scored as having a 'poor' flavour. In terms of texture, Pelipita and Bluggoe were scored as 'good', having the same or in the case of Pelipita a 'slightly too hard' texture compared with plantain. Cardaba, Fougamou and Valery fruit were considered 'too soft' after the cooking process. In terms of an overall assessment of boiled unripe fruit, the plantain samples consistently scored from 'good' to 'very good' quality. Pelipita was considered to be of , good' to 'acceptable' quality. Cardaba, Bluggoe and Fougamou were considered to be of , fair' to 'marginal' quality and only Valery was consistently scored as 'poor' and of 'unacceptable quality'. This series oftests clearly established that the panelists could identify plantain samples from a blind test and could also differentiate between the qualities of new cultivar samples. The cooking bananas which scored best from the boiled test were Pelipita and Bluggoe. Rank order showed a consistent trend.A similar test was conducted using fried ripe slices of plantain and cooking banana (Table 9.2). The quality scale ranged from 'very good' to 'poor' which related to a colour scale from 'golden-brown' to 'white'. The plantains and Pelipita scored as 'very good' for colour, Cardaba and Bluggoe as 'fair' and Fougamou and Valery as 'poor'. The scores for taste were in the same cultivar order as colour, except that only the plantains and Pelipita were considered to be of 'good' to 'acceptable' flavour. The other cultivars were all considered to be of 'poor' flavour.Texture data indicated that Pelipita and Bluggoe were of a similar texture to plantain whereas Cardaba, F ougamou and Valery were all considered too soft. The overall acceptability scores showed that Pelipita was the only cooking banana considered to be of a 'good' or 'acceptable' quality. Bluggoe and Cardaba were considered to be of 'fair' to 'marginal' quality, Fougamou was considered as 'poor' to 'marginal' quality and Valery was scored as 'very poor' and 'not acceptable'.The sensory data for the fried ripe samples showed that Pelipita was clearly the best cooking banana in terms of cooking quality. In contrast, Fougamou was considered poor due to the fruit structure breakin down during frying. The fruit colour ofFougamou was too pale and in some cases the vascular tissue turned red during flying providing a most unattractive sample. When fried Fougamou behaved more similarly to the dessert banana Valery. In terms of acceptability Fougamou would only be suited to areas which boiled the plantain in the unripe stage but would be most unlikely to succeed in areas where the predominant form of processing was frying ripe fruit.The taste panel data indicated that Pelipita was the most promising cooking banana in terms of cooking quality. The food quality scores for Pelipita when boiled and fried were similar to the plantain which suggests that this cultivar would be readily accepted in the diets of people in the region. Bluggoe and Cardaba were considered of marginal quality due to their taste and soft texture after cooking.Fougamou was only considered acceptable when boiled. Pelipita and Fougamou were found to be less favoured compared with Bluggoe and Cardaba due to their small fruit size and the fact that bunch preference was for plantain type as opposed to the cooking banana type.During interviews with farmers it appeared that many cooking banana growers used the fruit for home consumption. Although bunch weights of up to 35 kg were recorded for cooking bananas, farrr.ers were reluctant to sell the fruit due to its poor market value. Farmers reported that early attempts to sell the cooking banana fruit at the local markets proved difficult. •In 1989 and 1990 farmers were unable to convince consumers that cooking bananas were an acceptable alternative to plantain. Since that time the value of cooking banana bunches has slowly improved as more farmers sold bunches at the market and consumers became more familiar with the fruit type. Currently, bunches ofBluggoe and Cardaba are being sold at approximately half the price of plantain (Table 9.6). Agbagba held the highest price at approximately 9 Naira per kg. The French plantain Obino l'Ewai was being traded at approximately half this value at 3.5 Naira per kg and cooking bananas were being traded for approximately 1.8 Naira per kg. These data supported the opinions of several farmers that the sale value of cooking bananas was between 30010 to 40010 of plantain.Although this price discrepancy appeared large, when market price data were combined with the yield data from lIT A trials, to generate a gross margin per ha per year, the difference in crop revenue was less extreme (Table 9.6). The values of Agbagba and Obino l'Ewai were then reduced compared with the cooking bananas due to yield losses caused by susceptibility to black sigatoka. In addition the cooking bananas increased in value due to their higher bunch weight and shorter cycling time .Alongside the lIT A studies, extension services involved in this project also made observations on the acceptance of cooking bananas in the villages. These studies have shown that cooking bananas have received a mixed reaction from the farmer community. In the second year of distribution it was found that the cultivar Nzizi was not adaptable to the lowland conditions in Nigeria. Nzizi was only able to produce small bunches and was subsequently withdrawn from the project.In several areas Fougamou was not well received due to poor fruit size but this cultivar was sold in some regions as a dessert banana where it achieved reasonable market prices. Farmers found that Pelipita performed well on fertile. soils with good crop management. Reports concerning Bluggoe and Cardaba were most favourable as bunch sizes were consistently good and the only concerns were related to the poor market value of these cultivarsThe most negative reports on cooking bananas came in 1994, when lIT A was informed that farmers in one region of Rivers State had asked their extension officers to remove the cooking bananas. It was discovered that the farmers in this area had received large numbers ofNzizi . The area extension service, run by NAOC-Green Rivers Project, advised that Nzizi plants be replaced. It was also found that the people were unsure about how to process cooking bananas and consequently all the cooking banana cultivars were being sold as dessert bananas.At the request of the Green Rivers Project, lIT A sent a postharvest team into the region to meet with womens' groups and give advice on methods and recipes for cooking banana preparation. This work has significantly improved the acceptance of cooking bananas in the region .Introducing new germplasm into a region inevitably produces some unforeseen results and it was only after some time that yield stability analysis could be evaluated. This analysis has revealed that Pelipita and Fougamou have high but unstable yields, whereas Bluggoe and Cardaba are more stable (see Section 3.5.2). This would suggest that Fougamou and Pelipita are more suited to backyard production where the plants can receive high input levels, whilst Bluggoe and Cardaba are suitable for both field and backyard production (Table 9.6).Recent reports indicate that Agbagba, Obino I'Ewai, Fougamou, Pelipita and Bluggoe are susceptible to the fungal disease cigar end rot. This disease attacks the fruits during bunch filling, infecting dying flower parts and in severe cases causes total fruit loss. A limited survey showed that Bluggoe and Fougamou were most susceptible to this disease and bunches have been observed in which all the fruit were necrotic. Similar symptoms have also been observed on Pelipita (Table 9.6) Agronomic data indicated that the best cooking banana cultivars were Card aba, Bluggoe and Pelipita, while food quality evaluation found that Pelipita was the closest to plantain and the extension services favoured Bluggoe and Cardaba in terms of market potentiaL Recent information suggests that Cardaba is probably the most consistent cooking banana cultivar in terms of yield stability and overall disease resistance and Pelipita is a strong candidate when cropped in fertile soils.The future demands on cooking bananas in West and Central Africa will depend mostly on the regional severity of black sigatoka. In southeast Nigeria, plantain production continues unabated in backyards and on feltile land and this may explain low market value and slow rate of cooking banana adoption . Yield loss due to black sigatoka is most apparent on less fertile land and the future of cooking bananas probably lies in targeting cooking bananas to those areas which are suffering major losses due to black sigatoka.The experience of introducing cooking banana into West Africa highl ights the need for effective links between farmers, extension services and research institutes. An important lesson from the NARS partnership was that information should be disseminated to the farming community at release, and postharvest information should also be made available prior to the initial marketing phase. The links set up during this project provide the opportunity to channel information to the farmers and to conduct more detailed studies on reasons for adoption and rejection of new cultivars. Specific sites can be used to evaluate sigatoka severity and to continue the process of testing other high yielding cooking banana cultivars which are available in southeast Asia. Results from more detailed studies may enable better targeting of the cooking bananas in the future which may improve their market value. Developing this pathway to the farmers is also a vital prerequisite for the efficient future delivery of black sigatoka resistant plantain hybrids to the farming communities in West Africa. The station is representative for the humid lowland tropical rainforest ecosystem with characteristically high rainfall and only three months when potential evapotranspiration exceeds precipitation.Onne (longitude 7 0 10'E, latitude 4046'N. 10m above mean sea level) has an average annual rainfall of 2400 mm which is distributed monomodally from February to November. Temperatures are high, averaging 270C in the warmest months (February, March and April) and 25°C in July and August, the coolest months. Relative humidity remains high throUghout the year. with average values ranging from 78% in February to 89\"10 in July and September. On average there are only four hours of direct sunshine each day. The range•is from two hours per day in JUly and August to six hours per day in February.A summary of monthly and annual weather data at ORne in 1994 is shown in Table It.l. Total rainfall for the year (2393mm) was close to the long term mean. On 4 November 1994, 116 mm ofrainfaJI were recorded at Onne. About 100 mm rainfall with wind speed of3 .1 Ian h• 1 were recorded in the first 75 minutes alone, accounting for 40\"10 ofthe total rainfall for the month. This was a new record for the station. To maintain the productivity of the soil, shifting cultivation and the related bush fallow systems have been practised in the humid and subhumid tropics. However, with increasing population pressures, fallow periods are becoming too short for soil fertility to be restored. Improved systems for producing food crops are needed. The success of these systems will depend on managing the soil in a way that fertility is maintained.The highly weathered and leached ultisols of the humid forest zone have low base saturation «35% of the effective cation exchange capacity) and very low nutrient levels in the soil solution. Consequently these soils have a low capacity to provide nutrients to crops. Because of their low structural stability, these soils are prone to physical degradation following land clearing. Both soil compaction and surface crusting which result from soil physical degradation reduce the infiltration rate, which in turn increases water runoff and soil erosion. The eventual result is a highly degraded soil. The low productivity ofthese soils has also been attributed to high aluminium (AI) and manganese (Mn) levels which are toxic to plants.Organic matter is a key component of soil fertility, as a reservoir of nutrients, as a main source of cation exchange capacity and as major promoter of aggregate structural stability. Under intensive cultivation the soil degrades very rapidly. This is associated with a substantial decline in organic matter status.Nutrient limitations become apparent and the acidity and aluminium toxicity increase. Furthermore, the structural coherence is diminished which results in accelerated runoff and erosion.Weeds are also a major impediment to food production which is exacerbated by the shortening of the fallow period. ]n some parts of the humid forest zone the weed Imperato cylindrica has become dominant . When this occurs it is almost impossible to return the land to productive cultivation. Biological activities in the soil have a pronounced effect on soil productivity. Soil biological processes contribute to fertility by increasing the amount and efficiency of nutrient acquisition and recycling by vegetation, by the synthesis and breakdown of soil organic matter, by regulating the retention and flow of nutrients, and by the maintenance of good soil physical structure and water regimes.Soil fertility problems of ultisols can be corrected by liming, appropriate fertilization and appropriate agronomic practices. However, socioeconomic constraints often limit the application of these crop production technologies.One of the major objectives of research at Onne Station is to alleviate the constraints of soil fertility which limit the sustainability of crop production systems. Special consideration is given to smallscale farmers who have limited resources to purchase inputs. Results have shown that low applications ofHme are sufficient to reduce toxic levels of Al and Mn. While modest amounts offertilizer application combined with appropriate agronomic practices including intercropping, agroforestry and fallow management systems can sustain high yields.Research has shown that there are a number of processes by which soil productivity can be sustained with low external inputs. These are processes that contribute to the production and maintenance of in situ mulch, soil protection, and recycling of nutrients. Technology developments at Onne Station seek to couple biological processes with improved cropping systems, which enhance the stability and increase the efficiency of resource use. Two main farming systems are being evaluated, namely imprOVed bush fallow management and agroforestry.A key feature of the cropping systems design is to have a flexible system which can be adapted to meet location-specific cultural and environmental needs. liT A's priority crops in the humid forest are cassava, maize, plantain and yarn since they are important components of the cropping systems in this agroecozone. Other crops such as cowpea, are considered as part of the farming system where appropriate.Cassava grows well in acid soils. Since it performs so well under such adverse conditions, cropping systems that are based on this important root crop are essential. Such systems, which have been evaluated at Onne Station, include intercropping of cassava with maize and the rotation of cassava with leguminous species such as cowpea and pigeonpea and leguminous cover crops.Research on intercropping has quantified the productive potential of cassava-based mixtures and cereal-legume combinations. Low-growing species such as egusi melon (Citru/us lunatus) and white melon (Cucumeropsis manii) have been confirmed to have favourable effect on soil conditions and weed control.The use of perennial trees and shrubs in cropping systems has also been studied at Onne Station. In an agroforestry arboretum maintained at the site since 1979, various perennial trees and shrub species have been evaluated for their adaptation to the humid, lowland tropical conditions. They are also evaluated for their potential use in alley cropping (an agroforestry system of growing food crops in alleys formed by hedgerows of trees or shrubs) and other cropping systems.Substantial seed and live germplasm collections of indigenous and exotic multipurpose tree and shrub species have been established and are presently being screened for appropriate agroforestry use in collaboration with the International Centre for Research on Agroforestry (ICRAF, Kenya) and Oregon State University (OSV, USA).Easily established species such as Dactylm:knia (was Acioa) barteri, Alchornea cordifolia, Cassia siamea, Flemingia macrophylla and Gmelina arhorea have been widely tested in alley cropping systems. Such systems show great potential for maintaining soil fertility through the mulch and green manure provided from pruning the trees and shrubs. The mulch also protects the soil during intense rainfall and conserve soil moisture during the drier periods in addition to suppressing weeds. Some of the pruning can also be used as browse or fodder for livestock. The trees or shrubs also provide staking material for food crop plants as well as firewood for the farm family. A further advantage of alley cropping is the recycling of nutrients from deep soil layers. However, results indicate that the trees or shrubs need to be carefully selected for favourable characteristics such as deep root systems which do not compete with the roots offood crops for nutrlents and moisture and that recycle nutrients from deep layers. These trees or shrubs should also have high biomass production of a high quality mulch that suppresses weeds, conserves soil water and requires a low pruning frequency in order to reduce labour costs. Dactyladenia harleri has performed particularly well under this environment and is recommended for on-farm testing. The system is being improved to include a nitrogen fixing legume to enhance soil productivity.Researchers at Onne Station have developed a fallow management strategy in which Tephrosia candida (a nitrogen fixing shrub) is introduced in shifting cultivation or bush fallow systems at the beginning of the fallow cycle. Tephrosia candida enhances the soil regeneration process by increasing the nitrogen content of the surface soil, recycling nutrients from deeper layers and improving soil physical properties in one or two years as opposed to the six or more years required by natural bush fallow.A continuous maize/cowpea rotation has been developed at Onne Station. In this system a maize monocrop is followed by a cowpea crop planted in the rainy season and harvested in the dry season. With an adequate supply of nutrients, low levels ofliming and recycling of all crop and weed residues, maize and cowpea Yields can be maintained. However, cowpea is susceptible to several insect pests and consequently grain yields rer.lain low when insecticides are not used .The inherent infertility and fragility of the soils and the high risk of weed and pest impact are the major constraints to be overcome by viable resource management technologies. The highest priority is to study and develop cropping systems that integrate food crops, multipurpose trees and other plants which have environmental or commodity value. Studies should be intensified to address the rapid decline in productivity observed during continuous plantain cropping in field conditions, as compared with household compound gardens. The 100 hectare farm is divided into blocks mostly 4 hectares each. These are allocated to meet research needs or fallowed with green manure crops to keep fertility and control weeds. Roads and drains are kept cut to enable free movement and maintain tidiness. A complement of machinery is kept to perfonn maintenance, material transport Of research tasks including field preparation. A farm store is kept stocked to provide fertilizers and pesticides for experiments. Tools for farm work are also kept and loaned to the workforce.On-site workshops service and repair all station motor vehicles, motorcycles and agricultural machines. These same workshops also service and repair other research equipment and household appliances,both mechanical and electrical.Staff in this section perfonn building construction and maintenance, other civil works, steel fabrication of research equipment, and woodwork ranging from furniture to large structures.The station electricity supply with standby generators, water supply from deep borehole to overhead tanks, sewage and waste system are all serviced and maintained using latest materials and technology. The unit also extends some of its services to local communities and neighbouring establishments in times of need within practical limits.Onne Station has proved to be valuable for studying management of acid soils, crop production techniques, and screening for resistance to insect pests, fungal , bacterial and viral diseases in most crops. More recently, there has been much success in cross-pollination of plantains and banana, producing unusually large numbers of viable seeds. This enabled lIT A to establish its Musa breeding program.On-farm trials are currently being carried out in cooperation with extension services of public and private organization in the region to test not only disease and pest resistant material but also the potential of improved germplasm and new , 1991-1993) Tallie 2.10 Genetic eIfccIs in marker loci of segregating euploid planlain-banana hybrids Tallie 2.11 Analysis ofvariance for quantitative traits based on two segregating markers (bs J.black sigatoka resistance, P J. frUit parthcnocarpy) and ploidy in the euploid hybrids derived from crossing Iriploid female fertile plantains with diploid male fertile bananas Table 1.21 Best multiple regression models (stepwise procedure), based on ploidy and genetic effects in marker loci (bs J' P J), which explain heritable quantitative trait variation in bunch and fruit traits of the segregating offspring of Obino I' Ewai x caIcutta 4 Ta~ 2.13 HOSf-rcspoose 10 black sigatoka, as measured by the youngest leaf spotted, of resistant tetraploid hybrids and their susceptible plantain parent (Nyombe, Cameroon 1992-1993) Table 1.24 Means for growth and yield parameters in each environment (cycleJlocation) Tallie 1.2~ Analysis of variance for growth and yield parameters of 18 Musa accessions grown in six clwironments Table 2.26 Analysis of variance for growth and yield parameters of 18 Musa accessions grown in three locations TUie 1.27 Analysis ofvariaDce for growth and yield parametcn of 18MILfo \"'X\"'Sftons grown in IhRe Ioc:ations with two cycles for each iocatiOll Tlible 1.2I'\"\"'\"CCsI leaf with sympIDIIIs, totaIlc:af area attacked by black sigatok-eli-..: in a ()..6 scale, or in ~ and index of _ _ with occropc spots, based on the gcaotypc and oct efI'ect of intralocus interaction of bs riocus in euploid hybrids derived from croues betweeu the FreDCb plantains Obino I' Ewai and Bobby TmDIp with Calculla 4 (Chlac, 1991(Chlac, -1993) ) 5.17 Roof health and nellJ8lOdc population in MIISQ germplasm from flowering to barvcsI ~ Ghana 1994) Table S.18 Incidence of nematodes in 10 g of Mum rooIs from flowering to harvcat (H) (Kade, Ghana 1994) Table 11.19 Musa clones exhibiting pcn:nniaI vigour after > .5 years in the same field genrhanks on the poor soils whicb may be indicative of a good root system andIor _todc resistance (Onne, 1994-199.5) Table S.1O ANaYA of virus like-symptoms incidence in MET trials (based on indivickial clonal means per each environment) (West and Central Africa, 1992Africa, -1994) ) Table 5.11 Environmental and clonal means of virus-like incidence (%) in MET-I (Nigeria andCameroon, 1992-1994) Tablc: S.ll Environmental and clonal means of virus-like incidence (%) in MET -2 (Ghana, Nigeria andCameroon, 1992-1994) Table 6.1 Monthly overview of ;/1 vitro germination of seeds bandied by the Plantain and Banana Tissue CultuJe Laboratory (Oone,I994) Iandraces andbybrids (Oone. 1993-1994) Tablc: 7.3 Mean fruit dry matter content (DMC, %) during ripening stages I and 3 for a selection of Musa 1andraces and bybrids (Oone, 1993-1994) Table 7.4 fruit cbaracteristics for a selection 01 Musa IaDdraces and hybrids at dift'erent ripening stages (Onne, 1993-1994) Table 7.5 fruit physical characteristics at ripening stages I and 3 for a selection of Mum landraces and bybrids (Onne. 1993-1994) Table 7.6 Peel fresh weigbt (g) at different stages of fruit ripening for a selection of MUSQ landraces and hybrids (Onne. 1993(Onne. -1994) ) Table 7.7 Changes in peel fraction (\"/0 of fresh fruit weight) during fruit ripening for a selection ofMIlsQ landracesand hybrids (Onne. 1993(Onne. -1994) ) Table 7.8 Pulp fresh weight (g) at different stages of fruit ripening for a selection of Musa landraces and hybrids (Onne. 1993(Onne. -1994) ) Table 7.9 Changes in pulp fraction (0/. of fresh fruit weight) during fruit ripening for a selection of MllSa landraces and hybrids (Onne, 1993(Onne, -1994) Table 7.10 Peel hardness (penetrometer readings. max Nm mm-2 ) at different stages offruit ripening in a selection of MUSQ Iandraces and improved clones (Onne. 1993-1994) Table 7.11 Pulp hardness (penetrometer readings. max Nm mm-2 ) at dift'erent stages of fruit ripening in a selection of Musa Iandraces and improved clones (Onne. 1993(Onne. -1994) ) Table 7. 12 Mean pulp hardness (penetrometer readings. max Nm mm-2 ) during fruit ripening stages 7 to 9 in a selection of Mum landraces and Improved clones (Oone, 1993(Oone, -1994) ) Table 7.13 Peel thickness (em) at different stages of fruit ripening in a selection of Musa landraces and improved clones (Onne. 1993(Onne. -1994) ) Table 7. 14 Pulp hardness (penetrometer readings, max Nm mm-2 ) at different stages of fruit ripening for a selection of Musa clones (Onne, 1993-1994) Table 7.15 Mean pulp hardness (penetrometer readings, max Nm mm-2 ) during ripening for a selection of Musa clones (Oone, 1993-1994) Table 7.16 fruit ripening time (days after harvest) for a selection of MllSa Iandraces and hybrids (Onne. 1993(Onne. -1994) ) Table 7.17 Rank order of days to fruit ripening (pooled data for stages 6,7 and 8) for a selection ofM\"sa Iandraces and hybrids (Oone, 1993(Oone, -1994) ) Table 7.18 Buneh ripening (days after harvest) for a selection of Musa clones (Onne.1993(Onne. -1994) ) Table 7.19 fruit ripening time (days after harvest) for six Musa clones from FHIA and one wild diploid banana (Onne, 1992(Onne, -1993) ) Table 7.20 Pasting properties for selected Musa clones (Onne. 1992(Onne. -1994) ) Table 7.21 Coefficient of[ruit weight loss (0/. day .1) for a selection of MUSD clones (Onnc,1993(Onnc, • 1994) ) Table 7.22 Average linkage cluster analysis based on rate of fruit weight loss of Musa clones (Onne, 11193•) 994)Table 7.23 Average linkage cluster analysis at the 70\"/0 level based on change of fruit colour of Mwsa clones Table 7.14 Physical fruit characteristics of Musa hybrids in segregating populations Table 7.lS Effect of abrasion on fruit ripening period (days) of plantain, banana and their hybrids. Table 7.16 Effect of abrasion on rate of daily fruit weight loss ('Yo) of plantain, banana and their hybrids Table 7.17 Effect of abrasion on hardness (penetrometer readings, max Nm mm' 2 ) of fruits of plantain, banana and their hybrids Table 7.21 In1luena: of rdative humidity (RH) on fruit ripening period (days) of abraded fruits Table 7.19 Effect of impact injury on fruit ripening period (days) ofplantain, banana and their hybrids Table 7.30 Effect of impact injury on daily fruit weight loss (%) of fruil of plantain, banana and their bybrids TMie 7.31 Effect of impact injury on pulp (% damage) of plantain, banana and their hybrids Table 7.31 Effect of compressing pressure on fruit ripening period (days) of pllIJIIain, banana and their hybrids Table 7.33 Effect of incision on fruit weight loss (0/. day.l) of plantain, banana and their hybrids 7.45 Average linkage cluster analysis, at the 7S% level. based on quality traits for dodo as measured by taste panelists at Onne Table 7.46 Taste panel preference for unripe boiled fruit (Kade, Ghana) Table 7.47 Descriptive analysis for taste panel data on unripe boiled fruit (Kade, Ghana) Table 7.48 Taste panel preference for fofu (Kumasi, Ghana) Table 7.49 Descriptive analysis for taste panel data onfofo (Kumasi, Ghana) Table 7.50 Recipes for cooking banana(ABB)-and plantain(AAB)-based extrudates Table 7.51 PhYSical and functional properties of cooking banana• and plantain• baaed extrudalcs Table 7.51 Nutritional composition of cooIting banana-and pIaDtain-based snack food Table 7.S3 Scores of different extrudates in adult's sensory evaluation test (using a 9-point hedonic: scale) Table 7.SoI Analysis of variance on adult's sensory evaluation ofCruit extrudates at Ibadan and Onne Table 7.55 Analysis of variance (F.ratio) for fruit quality attributes of the extrudatcs (based on child's sensory evaluation) Table 7.56 Scores of different extruclates in child's sensory evaluation test [1993][1994] Table 1.3 Bunch weight and its components of nine Muso clones with male bud W2S retained (+)orrcmoved (-) (Onne, 1993(Onne, -1994) ) Table 8.4 Soil nutrient slatus at planting of mulching experiment (Onne, 1994) Table I.S Plant height in mulching experiment at six months after planting (Onne, 1995) Table 1.6 Plant height 20%, respectively. High GCV were recorded for fruit yield (55.1), fruit weight (34.5), number of fruit ( 29), node order of first male flower (25.2), number of male flower per plant (25), and rind thickness (23.1); while number of female flower per plant (18.9), branching (18), fruit length (14.7), and fruit diameter (10.6) showed medium GCV and vine length (10.0), node length (8.3), node order of first female flower (6.7), days to first female flower open (5), and days to first male flower open (4) exhibited low GCV. High phenotypic coefficients of variation (PCV) were also recorded for fruit yield (58.7), fruit weight (37.7), rind thickness (33), number of male flower per plant (33), and node order of first male flower (31.9), but moderate PCVs were recorded from branching (28.5), node order of first female flower (19.4), vine length (18.6), and fruit length (16.8); in contrast, remaining traits showed low PCV (Table 3). The estimated phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) was higher than genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for all the traits indicating greater environmental influence on these traits for total variation. Correlation coefficient and factor loadings of the morphological traits were measured in 16 watermelon genotypes were shown in Table 4 and 10. Days to first male flowering was found negatively correlated with number of male flower. This trait also has correlation with fruit skin color. Node order of male flowering was found negatively correlated with number of fruit. Number of male flower, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, leaf shape, and fruit yield were found to be highly correlated characters. Number of female flower was negatively correlated with vine length. Number of fruit showed negative correlation with rind thickness and positive correlation with fruit yield. Fruit yield showed very poor correlation with days to first female flowering, number of female flower, vine length, branch number, node length, rind thickness, fruit shape, skin color, and flesh color.Estimation of phenotypic distance was obtained from qualitative and quantitative data measured from the total samples. This assumes that the differences between the characters reflect the genetic divergence of the accessions being compared. Distance coefficients between pairs of the varieties using Euclidean geometry are shown in and rind thickness. It also required maximum days for male flowering and highest number of female flower (Table 7 and Table 8).PCA was used to identify the most significant variables in the data set (Table 4). The screen plot of the PCA (Figure 2) shows that the first six eigen values correspond to the whole percentage of the variance in the dataset. The first six main PCAs were extracted from the complicated components, the total cumulative variance of these six factors amounted to 81.7% and these components had eigen values > 1 (Table 9). The PCA simplifies the complex data by transforming the number of associated traits into a smaller number of variables as PCAs. The first PCA accounts for maximum variability in the data with respect to succeeding components. The PCA grouped the estimated variables into six main components of , which PCA1 accounted for approximately 27.8% of the variation; PCA2 for 15.4%, PCA3 for 14.1%, PCA4 for 11.4%, PCA5 for 6.7%, and PCA6 for 6.3%. The first PCA was related to days to first male flower opening, number of male flower per plant, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, fruit yield, and leaf shape, whereas the second PCA was related to days to first female flower opening, node order of first female flower per plant, node length, and fruit skin color (Table 4).The third PCA contrasts variables that were related to number of fruit, node order of first male flower, and branch number. The forth PCA was related to vine length, number of female flower and, rind thickness. By contrast, the fifth PCA was related to fruit shape and the sixth PCA was related to stripe color. The first two principal components contributing approximately half of the variance were plotted to observe the relationships between the measured traits of watermelon (Figure 2). The correlation coefficient between any two traits is approximated by the cosine of the angle between their vectors. The correlation coefficients among the traits indicate that the plot currently shows the relationship among the traits that had relatively large loading on both PCA1 and PCA2 axes.The most prominent relations shown in Figure 3 are a strong positive association among NMF, FW, FD, FL, FY, and LS, between DMF-SC, between NF-FY as indicated by the small obtuse angles between their vectors (r = cos0 = +1). There was a negative correlation between DMF -NMF, between NOMF-NF, between NFF-VL, and between NF-RT (Figure 3) as indicated by the angle of approximately 180° (r = cos180 = -1). Some discrepancies of the plot predictions and original data were expected because the first two PCAs accounted for <100% of the total variation.Correlation between the traits like number of male flower, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, leaf shape, and fruit yield indicated that positive change for one of them will be positive for others and these are the important trait to increase yield. Number of fruit The results of the PCA revealed that in PCA1 the important characters responsible for genetic divergence in major axis of differentiations were days to first male flower opening, number of male flower per plant, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, fruit yield, and leaf shape. In PCA2, days to first female flower opening, node order of first female flower per plant, node length, and fruit skin color played a major role while the rest of the characters played minor role in second axis of differentiation. Alam et al. (2006) reported days to heading, 1000 grain weight, and yield per plant were the major contributors toward divergence in hull-less barley. Mondol et al. (1989) found that number of fruits per plant and yield per plant were important contributors towards divergence of pumpkin. Moreover, Habib et al. (2007) reported same for grains per panicle, grain length, and harvest index for rice.In cluster analysis, the distribution pattern indicated that the highest number of genotypes (7) was included in Cluster III and the lowest were in Cluster V. Larger intercluster distances in all cases than intracluster distances suggests wider genetic diversity among the genotypes of different groups. The highest intercluster distance was observed between I and V while the lowest distance was observed between the Cluster III and IV. Cluster I exhibited the highest intracluster distance while the lowest distance was observed in Cluster II. Somayajullu et al. (2011) reported the clustering revealed instability due to relatively lesser divergence. Whereas, widely divergent clusters remain distinct in different environments. The result was also supported by Raut et al. (2005). In this study, it was observed that Cluster II was highly diverged. So those would be more stable. The genotypes of the distant clusters could be used in crossing programs for obtaining wide range of variation among the segregates. Jagadev and Samal (2001) obtained segregants with wider variations among the genotypes in Niger from the crossing between the clusters involving the parents, which belonged to distant clusters. The crosses between the clusters-I and V were expected to exhibit higher heterosis and also likely to produce new recombinants with desired traits.The results of this study revealed that a wide variability existed among the collected commercially cultivated watermelon hybrids. Also, there was correlation of different yield contributing characters with the yield of watermelon genotypes. From the correlation coefficient analysis, it was observed that the number of fruits per plant had maximum direct and positive effects on yield of fruit. This character contributes indirectly to yield per plant via days to first flower, number of node at first flower, fruit length, and weight of fruit per plant. Cluster analysis revealed that there was wider genetic diversity among the accessions. In cluster analysis, the intercluster distances in all cases were larger than intracluster distances suggesting wider genetic diversity among the accessions of different groups. In PCA, the first PC accounts for maximum variability in the data with respect to succeeding components. These results could be used for generation of a core collection of watermelon accessions by elimination of redundant ones and for watermelon breeding programs by helping to identify useful, genetically distinct lines."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2725558715.json b/main/part_2/2725558715.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4185f10885ad20df6f63bf0a24c64ced7bffb58c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2725558715.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a86269c49d9c0c68516cc4b35f51bbcd","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/9fe5b76c-70f3-46f6-b900-6eee7328c0f5/content","id":"-1292929630"},"keywords":["drought exposure","drought tolerant maize adoption","farm input subsidy programme","Malawi","Mundlak-Chamberlain O13, O33, Q18, Q56"],"sieverID":"4bd3f844-8a72-4e62-93a7-8d7bb5d8c76e","content":"We examine adoption of drought tolerant (DT) maize varieties using a four-round panel dataset from six districts in Malawi. There is an increase in adoption of DT maize from 3% in 2006 to 43% in 2015 in our data. We focus on the effect of past drought exposure on adoption and the likelihood of DT maize being distributed under the Farm Input Subsidy Programme (FISP). Results show that past exposure to drought increases the probability of DT maize seed being distributed through FISP. Farmers who accessed maize seed subsidy coupons and were previously exposed to late season dry spells are more likely to use the seed subsidy coupon to redeem DT maize seed. The likelihood of adoption and adoption intensity (area under DT maize) are positively influenced by previous early season dry spells and access to seed subsidy. Previous late season droughts also positively affect adoption intensity. On the other hand, area share under DT maize is positively correlated with early season dry spells and past exposure to late season dry spells but negatively related to seed subsidy. FISP in Malawi appears to have stimulated adoption of DT maize directly through subsidy and indirectly through generating farmers' experiences of the performance of DT varieties under drought conditions.Weather shocks such as droughts and floods undermine crop yields and aggregate production thereby reducing food availability and agricultural incomes (Davies et al., 2009;Kassie et al., 2009;Pauw et al., 2011). Farm households' failure to adapt to climate change could aggravate the negative effects and can inhibit further investment and economic growth (Nangoma, 2007;Kato et al., 2011;Kassie et al., 2015). Weather shocks can cascade through low production to food insecurity and local and national economic disruption (Devereux, 2007). The problem is particularly serious among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), who are repeatedly exposed to weather extremes but with limited adaptation options. For example, Malawi has experienced several weather shocks during the last two decades that have led to severe crop losses, infrastructure damage and occasional displacement of people (Nangoma, 2007;Pauw et al., 2010). The most recent shocks include the droughts of 2001/02, 2004/05 and 2011/12 (Nangoma, 2007;Denning et al., 2009;Holden and Fisher, 2015;Msowoya et al., 2016) and the 2014/15 flash floods early in the growing season and droughts thereafter.Investing in agricultural production methods to boost farmers' resilience against weather shocks is a key strategy to reduce negative impacts (Davies et al., 2009;Pangapanga et al., 2012). In a country like Malawi and most countries in the SSA region, with poor or missing markets for insurance and credit and limited off-farm employment opportunities, adoption of agricultural management strategies that reduce production risks is an important option for smallholder farmers (Kassie et al., 2015). Drought tolerant (DT) maize is one potential technology that has the capacity to help smallholders adapt to drought risks. It is estimated that DT maize can produce up to 30% of their potential yield after 6 weeks of water stress, before and during flowering and grain-formation (Magorokosho et al., 2009). It is also estimated that DT maize can give a yield advantage of up to 40% over other maize varieties in severe drought environments (Tesfaye et al., 2016).We examine the adoption of DT maize among smallholder farmers in Malawi, focusing on how past exposure to dry spells affects adoption and the probability that DT maize is included in the seed subsidy programme. The paper combines household panel data spanning 9 years from 2006 to 2015 and daily rainfall data from 2003 to data from 2012 and perception data on lagged exposures to weather shocks (drought). In contrast, we use four rounds of household panel data to assess changes in DT adoption over the period 2006-2015, which includes substantial variation in rainfall shocks, and controlling for (stable) household preferences. We construct a more independent dry spell variable using measured daily rainfall data as opposed to farmers' perception/memory of recent droughts. We define a dry spell as a period of 5-15 days with a total rainfall of less than 20 mm following a rainy day of at least 20 mm. 2 Using this definition, we identified the length (days) of the longest dry spell in each of the survey years, namely 2006, 2009, 2012 and 2015, and the previous three seasons of each survey year.We hypothesise that the length of dry spells should have a positive effect on adoption of DT maize in later years (assuming farmers have learnt that DT maize performs better than other maize varieties). To learn about the relative performance, farmers need to be able to observe the performance of alternative varieties under those growth conditions. Conversely, lack of recent droughts may reduce the likelihood of adopting DT maize. Areas with higher average rainfall are less likely to have droughts or have longer growing seasons and this may reduce the probability of farmers planting earlymaturing DT maize varieties.Our third difference from the Holden and Quiggin (2017a) is that we disaggregate the dry spell variable into early season and late season dry spells. The early dry spells cover a period between December and early January that coincides with planting time while late dry spells coincide with maize grain formation between February and early March. DT maize performs relatively better than other maize varieties in case of late season droughts. Exposure to late droughts may have revealed this to farmers who have seen this on their own or neighbouring farms. Our expectation is that exposure to late droughts is more likely to have a significant positive effect on adoption of DT maize among farmers that have observed this through exposure to late droughts in earlier years. Such exposure, in combination with the FISP, should enhance adoption of DT maize.Maize varieties cultivated in the SSA region are classified into three major categories: traditional/local, hybrid and open pollinated variety (OPV) (Lunduka et al., 2012;Abate et al., 2017). The hybrids and OPVs are improved varieties whose breeding programme dates back to the 1930s in Zimbabwe (Magorokosho, 2007) and 1940s in Malawi (Mason and Ricker-Gilbert, 2013). The locally bred hybrid (LH7) in Malawi was first distributed in 1959 (Cromwell and Zambezi, 1993). Since then over 1,700 varieties have been released between 1950 and 2014 across countries in SSA, of which 68% are hybrids and 32% OPVs. As of 2014, improved maize occupied 57% of the land area under maize production in SSA (Abate et al., 2017). The hybrid maize varieties are high yielding while OPVs are early maturing, compared with local varieties, hence providing farmers with yield advantage (Lunduka et al., 2012). However, local varieties are still popular among farm households, despite proliferation of hybrids and OPVs, because of favourable processing and consumption traits such as taste, storability, poundability, high flour-to-grain ratios and lower requirements for inorganic fertiliser (Smale et al., 1995;Denning et al., 2009;Lunduka et al., 2012). Thus, while hybrids and OPVs have production advantage over local varieties, they do not yet have the consumption attributes that farm households prefer in local maize.Considering the subsistence nature of most smallholder farmers who produce mainly for own consumption, and non-separable household production and consumption decisions, farmers face a trade-off between planting improved maize varieties with good production attributes and a local variety with preferred consumption characteristics. Farmers tend to adopt a portfolio of maize varieties combining both traditional and improved (Smale et al., 1995;Lunduka et al., 2012). Smale et al. (1995) reported risk aversion, future utility prospects of the variety and rationing in input supply markets or credit as some of the reasons for joint production of local and modern varieties. Abate et al. (2017) report adoption rates of 32% hybrids; 23% OPVs; 46% local in SSA. Farmers weigh options as to whether to allocate more land to high yielding varieties with poor post-harvest attributes or put more weight on post-harvest attributes at the expense of high yields. With the apparent recent increase in droughts, farmers not only weigh high yielding against post-harvest characteristics, but also drought tolerance as a hedge against droughts.Drought tolerant maize seed became an integral component in breeding programmes across SSA countries during the late 1990s because of recurrent droughts (B€ anziger et al., 2006). The programme received support from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) and International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) with the launch of the Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) project in the mid 2000s. The project supported production and dissemination of DT maize varieties in 13 countries in SSA. Over 200 varieties were released before the project phased out in December 2015. The project was implemented jointly with national agricultural research systems who were responsible for seed delivery with support from public and private seed companies (Setimela et al., 2013;Wawa, 2016).In Malawi, as of December 2015, 18 DT maize varieties (15 hybrids and 3 OPVs) were released under the DTMA project. There are also other varieties developed outside the DTMA project that have been certified as drought tolerant by maize breeders (Abate, 2015;Holden and Fisher, 2015). The Government of Malawi includes DT seed in the FISP, making it more accessible (Lunduka et al., 2012;Holden and Fisher, 2015). FISP beneficiaries are officially entitled to two 50-kg bags of fertiliser and either one 2-kg bag of hybrid maize seed or a 4-kg bag of OPV seed (Ricker-Gilbert and Jones, 2015).Production under uncertainty can be presented as a state-contingent production function as proposed by Chambers and Quiggin (2000) and Quiggin and Chambers (2006). The model assumes y distinct outputs, x distinct inputs and s possible states of nature. A farm household allocates input x 2 < X þ and chooses state contingent output y 2 < SÃY þ . before the state of nature is revealed (ex ante), where; < þ implies that x and y are positive real numbers. Inputs are then fixed and output produced ex post (Quiggin and Chambers, 2006). If the household chooses output y and state of nature s is realised then the observed output is y s .The technology can then be summarised as T = [(x,y): x can produce y]. Given p y as output price and p x as the price of inputs, we can express the technology as a cost function C(p x ,y) = min[p x x:(x,y)2T], or as a demand function x(p x ,y) = argmin[p x x: (x,y)2T]. Assuming a simple case of two states of nature, one of which is unfavourable, the farmer's interest is to maximise output (y). The producer's problem is choice under uncertainty whereby state one is unfavourable if and only if output y 1 < y 2 . We may distinguish between inputs that are risk-complementary or risk-substituting in this kind of setting. If a shift from a state-contingent output vector y to a riskier output y' leads to an increase in demand for an input x j that is x j (p x ,y) < x j (p x ,y 0 ), then input x j is risk-complementary, otherwise it is a risk-substitute if x j (p x ,y) > x j (p x ,y') (Holden and Quiggin, 2017b). An increase in probability of a less favourable state will lead to an increased share of risk-substituting inputs in the input mix for a given expected output.Given that the farmer's objective is to maximise expected utility [EU(.)] from output y under the expected utility theory, the adoption decision of alternative inputs can be modelled as an optimal land allocation problem (Ding et al., 2009). Since smallholder farmers are price takers, and prices are assumed to be non-random, the only source of uncertainty is climatic risk. An individual farmer will allocate a mix of inputs to maximise expected utility from output (y). The farmer's optimal land allocation problem can therefore be specified as Max X E[U(p) ¼ MaxEU½p y y À p X ðXÞ. Our hypothesis is that experience of droughts will increase the likelihood of adopting DT maize. On the other hand, other improved maize (OIM) varieties are considered risk-complementary because they are optimal only under normal rainfall.However, the farmer's adoption decision will not only be affected by production factors but also consumption characteristics of the seeds. The risk-averse farmer is likely to adopt a portfolio of maize varieties to meet both production and consumption needs (Smale et al., 1995;Lunduka et al., 2012). DT maize will be preferred for early maturing and drought tolerant traits but is low yielding compared to other improved hybrids under normal rainfall, while local maize varieties will be chosen for consumption traits. The key question is the land area allocated to each variety. We first model the farmer's decision on whether to adopt DT maize varieties as a binary decision and then model the decision on area (ha) and area share allocated to DT maize varieties.The farmers' decision to adopt DT maize can be modelled using the latent variable approach (Wooldridge, 2014). The choice is based on the seed's characteristics and weather expectations for that season (Ding et al., 2009), and maximising utility implies partial adoption and farmers choosing a portfolio of seeds. Both market imperfections and household circumstances mean that production and consumption decisions are inseparable. The seed demand functions are therefore based on both wealth (consumption) and production characteristics. We therefore model the adoption decision of DT maize as follows:Ó 2018 The Authors. Journal of Agricultural Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Agricultural Economics Society.where DT it is the dependent variable representing the adoption of DT maize by household i in year t. R dt is a vector of variables capturing rainfall stress in the farmer' district d. Lagged dry spell variables are included to capture adaptive expectations of farmers on rainfall pattern for the forthcoming season. S it is a dummy for access to the FISP package of seed and fertiliser subsidies.M it represents market factors, including distance to agricultural markets (km) and the real price of inorganic fertiliser. H it denotes household characteristics such as education (years), age (years) and sex (1=female) of household head, male and female labour (adult equivalent/ha), off-farm labour (adult equivalent/ha), household size (number of persons), tropical livestock units (TLU) and asset values in Malawi Kwacha (MK). P it controls for observable farm characteristics such as farm size (ha) and number of plots. T it represents year dummies with 2006 as base year. a i captures unobservable time-invariant characteristics of households and plots such as timeinvariant observable and unobservable preferences, managerial ability and land quality. ɛ it is a normally distributed error term.Parameters in equation ( 1) are estimated using the Mundlak-Chamberlain (MC) models with a Control Function (CF) approach (Mundlak, 1978;Chamberlain, 1984;Wooldridge, 2010). In this MC framework, we include means and deviations of all household and farm characteristics. We model the adoption decision as a binary (zero/ one) decision, using a probit estimator (Wooldridge, 2010). For adopters, the second hurdle (decision) is how much land area (ha) to plant with DT maize varieties. We use a Tobit estimator to account for those who do not adopt DT maize, assuming normal distribution of the error term, ɛ it , (that is e it |X it ~Normal(0,r 2 )) (Tobin, 1958). Finally, we model the area share planted with DT maize varieties, using a fractional probit estimator to constrain the predicted value between zero and one (Wooldridge, 2011).Estimation of equation ( 1) can suffer from attrition bias due to non-random loss of sample households between the first and subsequent waves. Following Wooldridge (2010) we test whether attrition is random, and the results give evidence of attrition bias. Fortunately, with proper adjustments, unbiased estimation is possible even with high attrition. Using the MC device, for instance, allows us to control for time-constant unobservable factors that affect attrition. On the other hand, attrition bias due to observables can be controlled using an inverse probability weighting (IPW) approach (Fitzgerald et al., 1998;Wooldridge, 2010). IPW is, however, not available for our non-linear models.Another problem in this model could be sample selection bias and endogeneity due to non-random access to FISP by the households. To control for sample selection and endogeneity bias, we use a two-step control function (CF) approach (Petrin and Train, 2010;Wooldridge, 2011). In the first step, S it is written as a function of all exogenous variables entering the adoption model and the instruments that do not enter the adoption equation: where Z it are instrumental variables (IV) that can affect access to FISP but have no direct impact on adoption. Our choices for IV are: the number of children residing in the household; whether the area has a Member of Parliament (MP) from the ruling party, which can influence access to FISP based on previous studies (e.g. Holden and Lunduka, 2012;Mason and Ricker-Gilbert, 2013).We estimate two separate probit reduced form equations for seed subsidy and fertiliser subsidy as a first stage in this procedure and observe the significance of the instruments. If the instruments are jointly significant and hence relevant we then predict the error terms from each equation that are used to create control functions ( l it and c it ). Equation ( 2) is also used to test the first hypothesis on whether recent droughts result in an increase in the probability that DT maize was distributed related to the seed subsidy program. Having ascertained appropriateness of the instruments, we compute residuals ( l it and c it ) from both reduced form equations to include in the structural equation. The structural equation is thus estimated as:3. Data and Descriptive StatisticsWe 1). Our primary unit of analysis is the farm household. The household panel data are combined with daily rainfall data from the Department of Climate Change and Meteorological Services from 2003 to 2015, which allows us to generate dry spell variables that include lags for the past three seasons of each survey year. We use three seasons as the basis for farmers' expectations and experience in comparing the performance of alternative maize varieties under varying rainfall patterns. For previous early dry spells, the third season coincides with the early dry spell for the survey year, hence we limit the lags for the early dry spells to the past two seasons.In Table 2 we show adoption of DT maize disaggregated according to access to seed subsidy. Adoption was measured as whether farmers reported buying and using a DT maize variety. We consider both buying the seed through FISP or commercially at market price. The results show that adoption of DT maize varieties increased from 3% in 2006 to 43% in 2015. It is interesting however to notice that adoption of DT maize outside FISP is very low.Table 2 suggests some correlation between adoption of DT maize seed and possession of seed subsidy coupons. However these results also show that while seed subsidy may contribute significantly to adoption of DT seed, some adopters buy the seed commercially. The seed subsidy package contains hybrid and OPV seed coupons, which are both DT and non-DT seed so farmers have an option to redeem either DT or non-DT maize seed. Lunduka et al. (2012) reported that 98% of the beneficiaries preferred hybrid seed, with Holden and Fisher (2015) finding 69-82% redeeming DT maize seed.Table 3 shows the descriptive statistics for the dependent and independent variables. The dependent variables are 'adoption' equal to one if the household bought and used DT maize variety, and zero otherwise, 'maize area' (ha) allocated to DT maize and 'area share' under DT maize varieties. The key explanatory variable in this paper is 'dry spells'. The results show that, on average, the longest early dry spell lasted 9.3 days in 2006, 9 days (2009), 7 days (2012) and 5.7 days in 2015. In previous years to the survey year, farmers were exposed to the longest early dry spells in 2004 with an average of 10 days, while the longest late dry spell was in 2005 with an average of 13 days. We expect early dry spells in survey years to affect adoption as early warning of potential drought and/or a short rainy season. On the other hand, we expect previous exposure to late droughts to affect adoption through risk aversion. Also included in Table 3 are seed and fertiliser subsidy variables and household and farm-level factors. The 'farm size' (ha) variable is a total of all the plots cultivated by the household in a particular year. To enhance accuracy, all the plots were measured with a Global Positioning System (GPS) device.Table 4 presents results for access to seed and fertiliser subsidy and use of DT maize seed conditional on seed subsidy access. All the models are estimated using the MC framework. We include variables, ruling party Member of Parliament (MP) and number of children in the households, in seed subsidy and fertiliser subsidy models as instruments to compute residuals for the structural equations for the second hypothesis. The variable ruling party MP is positive and significant suggesting that the area whose Member of Parliament is from the ruling party is more likely to access seed and fertiliser subsidy coupons. With respect to exposure to recent dry spells, there is a positive correlation with DT seed distribution and use. Two-and three-year lags of longest late season dry spells are positive and significant on the probability that the household received seed subsidy coupons. Further, 1-year lag of early season dry spells and 2-year lag of late season dry spells significantly increase the likelihood that the household used the seed subsidy coupon to redeem drought tolerant maize seed.On the other hand, 3-year lag of average rainfall (mm), a proxy for rainfall distribution is associated with less likelihood of a household using the seed subsidy coupon to redeem DT maize seed. These results suggest that areas that have been exposed to more droughts in recent years are more likely to choose and redeem DT maize seed in the Farm Input Subsidy Package. Our results also suggest that farmers who were previously exposed to late dry spells are more likely to use the maize seed subsidy coupon to redeem DT maize seed varieties. Although the Government of Malawi tries to match seed varieties with appropriate agro-ecological zones and with farmer preferences (from demonstration trials), it does not relate varieties to recent weather experience.Table 5 presents our adoption results, estimated with the MC device with a control function (CF) approach. The three columns are: (i) DT adoption (Probit), (ii) area (ha) under DT maize (Tobit); (iii) area share allocated to DT maize varieties (Fractional Probit). The fertiliser subsidy residual is significant in area and area share models while the seed subsidy residual is significant in the area share model. Thus, we reject exogeneity of fertiliser subsidy and seed subsidy variables in these models 3 and deduce, therefore, our CF approach is appropriate.The results show that the likelihood of adoption of drought tolerant maize varieties is positively correlated with a 2-year lag of longest early dry spells and seed subsidy access, but there is negative correlation with 3-year lag of average rainfall. Intensity of adoption measured as area (ha) under DT maize is positively correlated with 1-year and 2-year lag of early longest dry spells, 2-year and 3-year lag of longest late dry spells and seed subsidy but inversely related to 1-year lag of late dry spells and fertiliser subsidy. Area share under DT maize has a positive and significant relationship with early longest dry spell and 2-year and 3-year lag of late dry spells but is negatively correlated with seed subsidy access.This positive impact of early dry spells can be explained by the fact that early drought acts as a warning to farmers of a potential drought season so that farmers are more likely to increase area share under maize varieties that are drought tolerant. Another possible explanation is that early drought signifies a short rainy season, so that previous exposure increases the likelihood of adopting early maturing maize varieties to fit into the growing season as Malawi has a unimodal type of rainy season. Although other hybrids are also early maturing, the 2012 experience shows that most farmers opt for DT early maturing maize varieties (Holden and Fisher, 2015) such as SC403 (Kanyani) which matures within 90 days after planting. Such varieties are not only drought tolerant but also suitable for replanting after an early drought.For late droughts, the positive impact of 2-year and 3-year lags suggest that farmers respond to previous late droughts by adopting technologies that hedge against resulting yield losses. These results suggest that farmers are influenced by previous exposure to droughts. The most important advantage of DT maize is its performance over other maize varieties under rainfall stress before and during the flowering period for maize, as reported by Magorokosho et al. (2009). If farmers' experience is in line with this, then more adoption will follow in years after early droughts where DT and other maize varieties were planted and their relative performance could be assessed. However, the negative impact of 1-year lag of late dry spells on DT area is unexpected and not easily explained.The findings overall suggest that the more severe (longer) the dry spells, the more the farmers become aware of the risks associated and hence a need to adopt DT seed. These results are consistent with our expectations and the findings of Holden and Fisher (2015) and Holden and Quiggin (2017a) that farmers who have been exposed to drought previously are more likely to adopt DT maize as an adaptive mechanism. Ding et al. (2009) also reported that farmers' experience with drought increases their likelihood of adopting risk-reducing agricultural systems such as conservation tillage. Our results, however, have specifically shown how early and late dry spells affect adoption and adoption intensity, a component not addressed by either Holden and Fisher (2015) or Holden and Quiggin (2017a).Access to seed subsidy is positive and significant in adoption and area models (consistent with Holden and Fisher, 2015) but negative in the area share model. On the other hand, fertiliser subsidy is negative on adoption and area but positive though insignificant on area share under DT maize varieties. The negative impact of seed subsidy on area share could be related to the small quantities of subsidised maize seed (2-kg bag of hybrid seed or 4-kg bag of OPV seed (Ricker-Gilbert and Jones, 2015)). Such quantities are too small to allow a significant increase on area share under DT maize varieties.Weather extremes, especially recurrent droughts, threaten agricultural productivity and food security in many countries especially in sub-Saharan Africa whose population largely depends on agriculture and maize for food. Drought tolerant maize is one promising technology to minimize the impact of droughts. Several drought tolerant maize varieties have been developed by national research institutions in collaboration with international research institutions such as CIMMYT and have been distributed across the countries. Examining determinants of adoption and adoption intensity of this promising technology is becoming increasingly important. Following Holden and Fisher (2015), Fisher et al. (2015) and Holden and Quiggin (2017a), we use a Mundlak-Chamberlain device with a Control Function approach to understand adoption of DT maize varieties in Malawi under rainfall stress.We combine data from farm households in six districts collected in 3-year intervals between 2006 and 2015 with experience of previous dry spells computed from daily rainfall data from 2003 to 2015. We include lagged early and late season drought variables in the panel data analysis to assess how adoption and adoption intensity is affected by drought exposure experience. We define adoption intensity in terms of maize area (ha) allocated to DT maize varieties and area share under DT maize. DT maize is known by scientists to perform better than other maize varieties under late drought conditions but not necessarily under early drought conditions, except that DT maize varieties are early maturing. We also extend the Holden and Quiggin (2017a) seed subsidy programme. Farmers previously exposed to late season dry spells are more likely to redeem DT maize seed varieties using the seed subsidy coupon. We also find positive correlations between the likelihood of adoption of DT maize seed and 2-year lagged longest early dry spells and also seed subsidy access. Areas under DT maize are positively influenced by 1-year and 2-year lag of early season longest dry spells, 2-year and 3-year lag of longest late season dry spells and seed subsidy, but there is an unexpected and unexplained negative effect of 1-year lag of late season droughts and fertiliser subsidy. We also find positive correlations between area share under DT maize and early season longest dry spell, 2-year and 3-year lag of late season dry spells, though, again unexpectedly, a negative correlation with seed subsidy access.Our results suggest that farmers respond to occurrence of early dry spells in current and previous seasons and exposure to previous late dry spells by adopting technologies that can minimize drought-related yield losses. Early droughts may signal a short rainy season, hence farmers are more likely to adopt early maturing varieties of which some are drought tolerant. Farmers' response to late droughts suggest that they are aware of the negative effects of late droughts and one way of hedging against such risks is by adopting drought tolerant maize varieties. Finally, the positive impact of seed subsidy on likelihood of adoption and area under DT maize is consistent with previous studies (e.g. Holden and Fisher, 2015) that FISP is a strong driver of DT maize adoption in Malawi. However the negative impact of seed subsidy on area share may reflect the small quantities of seed eligible for subsidy, suggesting that increasing the quantities of maize seed eligible for subsidy could significantly increase the area share allocated to DT maize seed.Our paper has generated new evidence that previous early droughts affect adoption of DT maize varieties by increasing farmers' adaptive expectations with respect to duration of the rainy season. Farmers previously affected by early droughts are more likely to adopt early maturing DT maize varieties. On the other hand, previous late droughts affect adoption through risk aversion as farmers adopt technologies that hedge against late drought risks. In a country facing persistent weather shocks, mainly droughts and floods coupled with missing or poor markets for weather insurance and credit, these findings are of great importance to enhance agricultural productivity. Farmers' adoption of drought tolerant maize, a drought risk-substituting technology is an indication that farmers in drought-prone regions in SSA countries are more willing to adopt a drought-resilient technology. As discussed in the conceptual framework, late drought risks increases adoption of risk-substituting technologies such as DT maize varieties at the expense of other hybrids and local maize.The understanding that farmers respond to exposure to weather shocks is an important observation not only for Malawi but other countries in the SSA region for the promotion of climate risk-reducing technologies. Promotion of technologies that are perceived by farmers themselves as climate-smart based on their experience are more likely to receive high adoption rates and make an impact on general household livelihood conditions. As the Government of Malawi is promoting adoption of climatesmart agriculture (CSA) technologies (Government of Malawi, 2016), extension messages should emphasize drought tolerant maize seed as a key component in the CSA campaign, with extension and promotion messages on the significance of DT maize under drought. Ensuring availability and affordability of the DT seed should continue being the priority strategy for the Government of Malawi. The government should make deliberate efforts to distribute more DT maize seed varieties in areas previously and frequently exposed to drought shocks, and consider increasing seed subsidy quantities from the current 2-4 kg. However since adoption outside FISP is low and this may present a sustainability problem, the agricultural extension service should do more to enhance awareness of DT maize seed so that farmers can continue using it even after FISP."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2731289564.json b/main/part_2/2731289564.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0d36d684f8b6917dcefc3192c4a72b114195367f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2731289564.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4735c1cffdd824486b397064545cec92","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/19c0eb57-c658-4131-910c-798624c5f12e/retrieve","id":"2105265695"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f39aaa4a-7835-4019-8579-320ba63fb777","content":"• ASF is completely different disease from Classical Swine Fever (CSF) and Swine Flu. • ASF does not cause any health risk to human, pork is safe for human consumption. • CSF vaccine neither prevents pigs from ASF nor it causes ASF.and gather the feed waste, bedding materials, gunny bags, dart adhering in the pig sty, etc. Burn these within the farm premises as far as possible, taking necessary precaution. • Thoroughly clean the floor, railing, wall, drain, central passage, feeding and water trough and farm utensils using water and cleaning agents (soap/detergent). • Disinfect the above with disinfectants such as -bleaching powder, phenol, formalin, sodium hypochlorite, lime, etc. as advised by local veterinarians. • Disinfect the pig sty and entire farm premise using disinfectants.• Clean and disinfect your personal clothes, gum boots, chappals, etc. and take bath with soap and water after completion of whole cleaning process.Bio-security is the best preventive measure • Neither buy nor sell diseased pigs/pork/pork products under any circumstances during this period. • Do not feed kitchen waste, hotel waste, slaughter waste, etc. having pork particles. If feeding of kitchen waste is essential, feed them only after boiling for 30 minutes. • Stop rearing of pigs under free ranging/tethering system. Construct a small pig sty with concrete floor. • Do not sale or buy pigs and pork, etc. during an outbreak. Ask your fellow farmers not to do it. • Do not take your pigs out of the farm for breeding purpose. Either rear a breeding boar or adopt Artificial Insemination (AI). • Thoroughly clean the sties, drains, utensils, equipment, clothings and the surroundings of your pig farm followed by disinfection with bleaching powder,phenol,formalin, sodium hypochlorite or lime. • Dispose of the feed waste, excreta, etc. of the farm in a manure pit dug inside the farm premises. • Arrange for a \"Foot-bath\" in front of each sty and a \"Wheel dip\" in front of the farm and keep it filled with potassium permanganate / bleaching powder solution, replace the solution daily. • Leave the ASF affected farm vacant for at least 40 (forty) days after properly cleaning and disinfecting. • Never buy new piglets from ASF infected farm or from the market.Only buy from a known bio-secured farm after gathering all the relevant information.• Initially introduce only 10% of the total strength of your farm.Keep this stock under strict observation for 6 (six) weeks for any reoccurrence of ASF. • Later on, if you buy new piglets, keep them in under quarantine for 21 days for observation. Introduce to in the main farm only when no symptom of ASF and other diseases is exhibited.Published by the ARIAS Society, G.S. Road, Khanapara,Guwaha -781022"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2736277258.json b/main/part_2/2736277258.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..474ca89e68627b9b6181290d42fafef2ba6a602f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2736277258.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6549986e4695bdbcf9f716e1eeb5ce34","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/Latin_American_Series/pdf/4.pdf","id":"-1494603488"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"dc8ca021-276e-4553-8220-a44a8552e6cb","content":"Aunque la idea inicial es dar cabida únicamente a aquellos trabajos directamente relacionados con el Instituto, no pensamos descartar, en manera alguna, la posibilidad de dar espacio a otras contribuciones consideradas pertinentes a las metas globales del Instituto.Como puede esperarse, el futuro de la serie dependerá de la aceptación y retro-alimentación recibida de parte de la comunidad a la cual esta dirigida: forjadores de políticas relativas al recurso agua, investigadores afines a la problemática del recurso, organizaciones e individuos involucrados, en una u otra forma, en aspectos técnicos, institucionales, económicos y sociales del manejo del agua, particularmente a la región latina pero en general a nivel global.Para sus comentarios, en español o inglés, puede comunicarse a cualquiera de las 2 direcciones que aparecen en el reverso de esta publicación.Figura 1. Figura 2. Figura 3. Figura 4. Figura 5. Figura 6. Figura 7. Figura 8. Figura 9. Figura 10. Figura 11.El presente estudio del Instituto Internacional del Manejo del Agua (IWMI) fue realizado en el periodo abril 1996 a abril 1997 en dos acequias privadas en la subcuenca del río El Angel en la provincia Carchi en el norte del Ecuador. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el desempeño técnico y los impactos hídricos, agrícolas, económicos e institucionales del manejo de riego en las dos acequias, tal como recomendar mejoramientos en el manejo del agua.El estudio se ejecutó dentro del contexto del trabajo del Consorcio para el Desarrollo Sostenible del Ecosistema Andino (CONDENSAN), el cual tiene los siguientes antecedentes. El Centro Internacional de Investigación para el Desarrollo (CIID) y el Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP), investigadores e instituciones de desarrollo del área andina, tomaron la iniciativa de establecer un proyecto regional que promueva el desarrollo sostenible de los ecosistemas de los andes altos. Este esfuerzo conjunto originó el CONDENSAN, que con el auspicio y la participación activa del Centro Agrícola del Cantón Espejo (Provincia del Carchi), de la Fundación para el Desarrollo Agropecuario (FUNDAGRO) y, del Instituto Autónomo de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), inició sus actividades en el proyecto Carchi, en octubre de 1993de (CONDESAN 1995)).En la actualidad forman parte de la mesa de concertación del consorcio Carchi las siguientes instituciones: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), CIP-Ecuador, CARE-PROMUSTA, INIAP, CONDESAN y los alcaldes de los Municipios de Espejo, Mira y Bolívar ( CONDESAN 1995).En octubre de 1995 fue invitado el IWMI a participar en la mesa de concertación del consorcio Carchi. La participación del IWMI en el consorcio enfocaría en el uso del agua de riego en las zonas altas y bajas de algunas acequias en la cuenca del río El Angel, en la cual la mayoría de los estudios de los miembros del consorcio fueron hechos. El IWMI estaba particularmente interesado en este tipo de estudio por tratarse de pequeños sistemas privados de riego en ladera. Esto permitiría no solamente identificar posibles impactos ambientales del riego en ecosistemas frágiles, sino también evaluar el desempeño de los mismos. Lo que además permitiría mas adelante comparar resultados con sistemas públicos de características similares.En el presente estudio el IWMI pretende dilucidar las siguientes preguntas con relación al desempeño y manejo de las dos acequias Garrapatal y El Tambo:? ¿Cómo está organizado el manejo de riego en las dos acequias privadas Garrapatal y El Tambo?? ¿Cómo es el uso del agua en diferentes tramos de las acequias, en términos de suficiencia, disponibilidad, oportunidad y equidad de la distribución?? ¿Cuáles son los impactos agrícolas, económicos y financieros, así como los impactos ambientales del manejo de agua?El área de influencia es el ecosistema húmedo altoandino de la provincia del Carchi, que se ubica en el norte de Ecuador entre los 2.800 y 3.000 m.s.n.m.(véase Mapa 1). El clima es frío con temperatura media que varía entre 9 y 11?C. Los extremos absolutos están entre 0?C y 22?C, y lluvias muy irregulares, que varían entre 1.000 y 2.000 mm por año. En la clasificación de las zonas de vida de Holdridge, la zona corresponde a bosque muy húmedo montano (bmh-Montano), bosque húmedo montano (bh-Montano) y, bosque húmedo montano bajo (bh-Montano Bajo) ( CONDESAN 1996).El área total de influencia es de 150.800 hectáreas ubicadas en los cantones Bolívar, Mira, Tulcán, Montúfar y Espejo. Se ha establecido una área piloto de intervención, que corresponde a la subcuenca del río El Angel y que coincide con los límites del cantón Espejo. La subcuenca cubre aproximadamente 19.000 has (CONDESAN 1995).En el área piloto se encuentra la reserva ecológica de El Angel, la misma que constituye un importante reservorio de diversidad biológica animal y vegetal de los páramos del norte del Ecuador y la fuente de captación de agua para los ríos: El Angel, Bobo, Grande, Chiquito, Plata, Morán, Chalguiyacu, Haurmiyacu y Cariyacu, como también de muchas quebradas ( CONDESAN 1996).El estudio del IWMI se circunscribe al área comprendida entre las coordenadas: 0?30`00\" y 0 ?37`30\" de latitud norte y 77?59`24\" y 78? 03`45\" de longitud occidental.De acuerdo a la clasificación de Thorntwaite, en el área se presentan dos tipos climáticos. Hacia el norte el sub-húmedo mesotérmico (CB), y en el sur semiárido mesotérmico (DB). Como es general en los valles interandinos, los valores medios anuales de temperatura oscilan entre 7 ?C y 18? C. En las estaciones meteorológicas de El Angel (3.055 msnm) y de Ibarra (2.228 msnm) la temperatura es de 11.6? C y de 15.9? C respectivamente (INMH 1974(INMH y 1976)).La precipitación y la evapotranspiración de las estaciones San Gabriel (representativa para la zona alta de las dos acequias), y de Ibarra (representativa para la zona baja) están presentados en las Figuras 1 y 2 (INMH 1997). Gabriel, abril de 1996 -marzo de 1997. La precipitación anual total en este año agrícola (96/97-San Gabriel) fue de 983 mm, mientras la evapotransporación era 1434 mm, lo cual significa un déficit de 451 mm en la zona alta. Con excepción del mes de enero, todos los meses muestran un déficit de agua. Figura Error! Unknown switch argument.. Precipitación y evapotranspiración, Estación meteorológica de Ibarra, abril de 1996 -marzo de 1997.La precipitación anual total en este año (96/97-Ibarra) fue de 632 mm, mientras la evapotranspiración fue 1562 mm, lo cual significa un déficit de 930 mm en la zona baja. En todos los meses la evapotranspiración es mas alta que la precipitación.De acuerdo al informe geológico del INERHI-DGGM en la sierra norte, el basamento está constituido por rocas metamórficas (posiblemente Paleozoicas) sobre las cuales se depositaron en el Cretásico como producto de una fuerte actividad volcánica lavas básicas de estructura en almoadillas, que se intercalan con productos vulcano-sedimentarios que se manifestaron hasta el Eoceno.En el Terciario superior continúa la acumulación de depósitos continentales de las Formaciones Tumbatú y Chota. En el Plio-Pleistoceno, se produce una gran actividad volcánica, consistente en lavas y piroclastos, que configuraron el actual paisaje andino y cuya influencia continúa actualmente en menor grado. Los volcanes formados en esta última fase pleistocénica fueron fuertemente erosionados por la actividad glaciar, quedando vestigios como lagos, tilitas, estrías, etc.Actualmente, los ríos por su acción erosiva se han profundizado dejando al descubierto fuertes escarpes, como también material de niveles aterrazados y depósitos aluviales (INERHI 1979).La vegetación constituye un elemento importante que impide los efectos erosivos en aquellos sitios donde existe alta susceptibilidad a la erosión, como es el caso de las áreas especialmente bajas del proyecto Carchi. Según el croquis ecológico, preparado en base al sistema Holdridge, la zona corresponde a la formación bosque seco montano bajo (bs-MB), la misma que ocupa la mayoría de los valles interandinos al sur de Bolívar, áreas aledañas al río El Angel y se ubica alrededor de los 2.500 msnm con una precipitación de 760 mm y una evapotranspiración de 730 mm.La vegetación natural ha desaparecido, la poca existente corresponde a formaciones arbustivas, la topografía es entre plana y ondulada, apta para cultivos hortícolas y frutícolas (Coello Hinojosa 1994).Los suelos en el área del estudio corresponden a la agrupación fisiográfica denominada relieve colinado a fuertemente socavado. En esta forma de relieve se caracterizan los suelos por la presencia de \"cangahua\" (una capa dura de suelo) y ceniza volcánica. Ocupa pequeñas áreas ubicadas en los valles interandinos, en San Isidro, García Moreno y Mira en altitudes de 2.000 a 2.800 msnm. El relieve predominante es el colinado a fuertemente socavado, con pendientes del 20% al 70%, existiendo áreas con declives menores al 20%.Los suelos son de color negro a pardo obscuro, de textura arenosa fina a limosa con un horizonte argílico de 5 a 10 cm de espesor; suelos muy superficiales (menos de 25 cm.) a moderadamente profundos (de 50 cm a 90 cm.). Son influenciados por cenizas volcánicas y limitadas por la presencia de \"cangahua\" poco meteorizda a menos de un metro de profundidad. El drenaje varía de moderado a imperfectamente drenado. Los resultados de los análisis químicos de los suelos indican que son normales en nitrógeno, muy pobres en fósforo y medianos en potasio. El pH varía de 6 a 7 (medianamente ácido a neutro). Taxonómicamente, los suelos corresponden al gran grupo Duriudoll (INERHI 1979).Conforme se desciende hacia el valle del Chota, el relieve se torna \"plano a ondulado suave\", con influencia de cenizas volcánicas y drenaje excesivo. Los estratos son de granulometría gruesa (arenosa media y gruesa), profundos (más de 90 cm.), mezclados con gravas de pómez y piedras. En algunos sitios hay presencia de micelios de carbonatos. Químicamente, son bajos en materia orgánica (menos del 1%), muy pobres en nitrógeno y fósforo y muy altos en potasio. Estos suelos han sido incluídos dentro del gran grupo Torripsament.El área del proyecto está situada en la cuenca hidrológica del río Mira que tributa al río Chota, el mismo que drena en el océano Pacífico. El río El Angel, afluente del Mira, constituye el recurso hídrico más importante (véase Mapa 2). En la subcuenca del mismo nombre, captan y se asientan los sistemas de riego particular, que benefician especialmente las tierras bajas de la subcuenca. La situación hídrica del río El Angel es crítica durante los meses de junio a septiembre (CONDESAN 1996).En consideración a que el 80% de la precipitación anual se produce en ocho meses (octubre a mayo), gran parte de esta lluvia, al no existir estructuras de almacenamiento, se drena hacia los ríos, no siendo por tanto factible utilizarlas en beneficio de extensas zonas agrícolas y muy especialmente en las zonas actualmente regadas, que acusan en el verano un déficit importante.Los recursos hídricos, provenientes de la cuenca son destinados al consumo humano, agrícola, energético e industrial, constituyendo la demanda para riego y agua potable las más importantes, ésta última a consecuencia de la falta de ordenamiento territorial -dispersión de los centros poblados y caseríos-los servicios de agua potable para usos doméstico, se han incrementado significativamene (CONDESAN 1996).Las condiciones orográficas de la cuenca y el recurso superficial abundante en el período lluvioso, favorecen un importante potencial de regulación con fines de riego.La Ley de Aguas, sancionada mediante decreto número 369 de 18 de mayo de 1972, faculta el aprovechamiento común de las aguas. Una vez el agua es captada y conducida por tubería, cada usuario puede derivar la cantidad que le corresponde sin perjuicio de los otros beneficiarios. Esta repartición se hace de común acuerdo entre los usuarios o por medio de las Agencias de Agua. En el área de estudio corresponde a la Agencia de Agua en Ibarra. Los usuarios del acueducto común contribuirán según sus derechos a la limpieza, reparación y sostenimiento administrativo del mismo. Así como para la construcción de obras indispensables o necesarias para su conservación o mejoramiento (GdE 1972).Si más de cinco personas fueren titulares de derecho de aprovechamiento, conferidos por la Agencia, en conformidad con la Ley y el Reglamento de la Ley de Aguas, se asociarán y constituirán el correspondiente Directorio de Aguas. Este directorio es un organismo de dirección y administración del recurso agua, que llevará el nombre del acueducto que les beneficia, a objeto de identificación y registro. Sus estatutos serán aprobados por la Agencia y ellos determinarán la organización, funcionamiento y vida de los mismos, así como el reparto, explotación y conservación de las aguas. Estos directorios se sujetarán a expresas disposiciones técnicas, legales y administrativas de la Agencia de Aguas. (GdE 1973).Para el aprovechamiento de las aguas, las personas naturales o jurídicas deben obtener una concesión volumétrica (expresada en un caudal entregado en la bocatoma, l/s) del Estado y asumir a su cargo la construcción, la operación y el mantenimiento de la infraestructura. En la práctica el estado no realiza ninguna inversión, no obstante que el riego particular cubre el 81%, de una superficie regada de 708.914 ha en territorio nacional a diciembre de 1993 (Sotomayor y Garcés 1997).Con los objetivos ya mencionados se realizó una inspección y análisis de la situación del riego particular en la subcuenca del río El Angel, habiéndose recorrido las acequias Pisquer, Puermal, Huaquer, Garrapatal y El Tambo (véase Mapa 2). Las conclusiones de los recorridos realizados, como del análisis de la información existente, es la siguiente:? La subcuenca abastece de riego y agua potable, mediante la captación de once acequias, localizadas a lo largo del río El Angel y de sus afluentes. Las superficies de riego y las fuentes de captación son presentados en el Cuadro 1, mientras algunas otras características son presentadas en Cuadro 2.Cuadro Error! Unknown switch argument.. Superficies de riego y fuentes de captación de las 11 acequias en la subcuenca del río El Angel. ? En lo relacionado con la distribución, la infraestructura secundaria no funciona como estructura de transporte del agua, sino de entrega parcelaria. Las redes terciarias y cuaternarias de riego a nivel predial no existen.? Los largos trayectos (existen acequias que tienen 42 km), que atraviesan lechos de alta permeabilidad, ocasionan pérdidas significativas de agua, que determinan que la disponibilidad de agua en la cabecera de la entrega parcelaria sea muy deficitaria y más aún para quiénes son los últimos regantes.En términos generales, los aspectos arriba mencionados han provocado a lo largo de los años ineficiencia de los sistemas de riego, desperdicios de volúmenes significativos de agua para los usuarios 1 de las acequias, constantes interrupciones del servicio de riego y daños a los suelos.En consideración a las limitaciones de tiempo y financieras, se escogieron las acequias, Garrapatal y El Tambo. Luego del análisis, estudio y recorrido de las acequias de la subcuenca del río El Angel, el propósito fue realizar en ellas un diagnóstico pormenorizado, que permita conocer el estado de la infraestructura, la operación y mantenimiento de los sistemas, la estructura de la organización campesina, el desarrollo del riego y el desarrollo agrícola.Estas dos acequias se consideran representativas del área tanto en términos de sus recorridos como de su infraestructura, patrones de cultivos y arreglos organizativos. La Garrapatal representa más la acequia 'moderna', mientras que El Tambo representa las tradicionales. Sin embargo, debe reconocerse que ambas acequias ofrecen limitaciones a un adecuado manejo de sus aguas.Ubicación. El área de la acequia se encuentra ubicada entre las coordenadas 0? 4` y 0? 35`de latitud norte y 77? 57`y 78? 88`de longitud occidental y cubre los sectores de San Antonio, Garrapatal, La Providencia, Chilcal, San Joaquín, Uyamá, Santa Rita, entre otros, pertenecientes a las parroquias de Mira y San Isidro, de los cantones Espejo y Mira. La superficie bruta es de 700 hectáreas. La bocatoma ha sido construída a la altura del nuevo puente Ayora. El área de riego dispone de caminos vecinales, que conectan con todos los caseríos existentes (MBS-INERHI 1991) (véase Mapa 2).Reseña histórica. La acequia fue construída hace más de cien años por iniciativa de los propietarios de las haciendas que exisitían en el sector, las cuales se extendían desde la zona de Ingueza en la parte alta hasta la zona de San Nicolás y Uyamá en la parte baja. Algunos de los moradores de la zona que trabajaban en las haciendas aún recuerdan las \"mingas\" (trabajo colectivo) que se realizaban para la limpieza y mantenimiento de la acequia organizadas por los dueños de las haciendas. En los años 60 en la provincia del Carchi se comienza a dar un proceso natural de parcelamiento de las haciendas previo a la reforma agraria. Los dueños de las haciendas comienzan a dividir sus terrenos con el objeto de vender sus propiedades y al mismo tiempo entregaron parte del terreno a los peones y \"huasipungueros\" 2 que habían trabajado para ellos. La entrega o venta de las tierras venía acompañada con el correspondiente derecho a la utilización del agua de la acequia. En el año de 1972, luego de la promulgación de la Ley de Aguas, los grupos de usuarios de la acequia Garrapatal se organizan en una Junta General para ser legalizados por la Agencia de Aguas del Ministerio de Agricultura.El sistema de riego. El sistema de riego tiene una dotación de agua concesionada de 244 l/s. Esta agua es proveniente del río El Angel, en la cota 2.665 msnm. La obra de captación consiste en una estructura para el tránsito de crecidas que dispone de azud, cuenco de disipación de energía y muros laterales. Lo bocatoma está en buen estado de funcionamiento. Al pie de la rejilla, a un costado del azud, existe una compuerta de limpieza. La estructura dispone de una rejilla y se comunica a un canal revestido de 1.2 m de ancho por 0.80 de alto, al final de este canal está instalada una compuerta de control de caudales y un vertedero lateral para evacuación de excesos al cauce del río.La conducción se inicia por la margen derecha del cauce y se dirige hacia el área de riego mediante una conducción de 10.77 km de longitud, de los cuales 6.68 km corresponden al tramo de conducción y 4.09 km a las redes de distribución secundaria. Para la entrega del agua a nivel de las zonas módulos, la acequia dispone de estructuras de derivación y control; 9.0 km corresponden a tramos de acequia con sección media de 0.80 m de ancho por 0.7 m de alto, y de varios túneles que totalizan una extensión de 1.8 km. En el trayecto están construídas algunas obras: secciones revestidas, embauladas, muros de protección, pasos vehiculares y derivaciones secundarias que transportan el agua a los 11 módulos de riego. La mayoría de las obras están en regular estado de mantenimiento, el mismo que mejora substancialmente en la época de riego (MBS-INERHI 1991).Cuadro Error! Unknown switch argument.. El número de los usuarios, la superficie y la concesión para las zonas de la acequia Garrapatal. Organización. La junta de usuarios de la acequia Garrapatal está organizada en subjuntas, las cuales tienen una directiva conformada por un presidente, tesorero y secretario. Los presidentes de cada una de ellas, forman la directiva de la Junta General de la Acequia. Según los Estatutos y Reglamentos de la Junta de Aguas, los mismos que son aprobados por la Agencia de Aguas de Ibarra, la junta general se debe reunir periódicamente (cada dos meses) con el objetivo principal de proponer fechas para la limpieza total de la acequia y conocer los problemas y logros de cada subjunta en lo referente a la administración de la acequia. En la actualidad la junta general se reune solamente dos veces al año y la asistencia de los usuarios no es mayoritaria. Las elecciones de la Directiva General, se realizan cada año, aunque los últimos tres años ha sido reelecta la directiva actual.Las elecciones en las directivas de las subjuntas, también se realizan según el reglamento de la junta general. Estas directivas han sido reelectas en formas reiterada, manteniéndose sus personeros por períodos de cinco a diez años. Existen casos como en el de la subjunta La Cocha, en la cual su presidente y los miembros del directorio han permanecido por más de quince años en funciones prorrogadas. En las subjuntas se presenta el mismo problema de la falta de asistencia por parte de los usuarios a las reuniones que realizan las directivas.La principal obligación de cada subjunta, es la de realizar la limpieza y el mantenimiento de un tramo determinado de la acequia, (canal principal). Existen once subjuntas: La Cocha, Grandeza Nacional, Loma Chilcal, Loma Seca, San Joaquín, San Andrés, San Nicolás, San Marcos, San Francisco, Playa Rica y Uyamá.La distribución del agua. Los directivos de la junta de usuarios de la acequia Garrapatal, realizan el reparto del agua de riego de acuerdo a los turnos que fueron fijados en los estatutos, los cuales fueron aprobados a mediados de los años 70 por la Agencia de Aguas en Ibarra y supervisados por técnicos del INERHI. Los turnos se basan en el caudal concesionado de la zona, tiempo y superficie regada. El criterio utilizado varía en las diferentes zonas de riego. En algunas zonas el criterio es el de conceder 12 horas de uso de agua por hectárea, mediante turnos cada 15 días. En otros casos son turnos de 6 o 7 horas de uso de agua por hectárea (Cuadro 4). Esta disposición se fundamenta en que el caudal que discurre en el canal principal se distribuye en forma proporcional a la superficie de cada módulo y a un caudal característico teórico.En ciertos módulos existen variaciones en cuanto a la utilización de estos turnos y distribución de agua. En el caso de la Cocha no existe el respeto de turnos de riego. Los usuarios riegan en el momento que ellos consideran necesario. Según los usuarios hasta el momento no ha existido la necesidad de organizarse por turnos debido a que existe suficiente agua. En otros módulos existen usuarios que reciben más horas de agua de lo que normalmente les correspondería por hectárea según la distribución de los turnos. Esta situación se da por la venta de derechos de agua. Aunque de acuerdo a la Ley de Aguas es ilegal la venta de derechos de agua sin terreno, existen casos de usuarios que vendieron sus horas o turnos de agua a otros usuarios quedándose con los terrenos.Cuadro Error! Unknown switch argument.. La organización de la distribución del agua en las zonas de la acequia Garrapatal. El cuadro 4 permite observar que, según las concesiones y el sistema de turnos de cada zona, no existe equidad en términos de la cantidad de agua en los turnos. Esto debe interpretarse cuidadosamente ya que parecen existir derechos de agua adquiridos que tienen prioridad legal. Igualmente, se menciona venta de derechos de agua, aunque sea ilegal. Finalmente, es de anotarse que la desigualdad en la distribución no está relacionada a la posición geográfica del predio en la cuenca ya que se dan valores altos y bajos en cada tramo. Método de riego. En las once áreas modulares de riego, los agricultores son los responsables de la operación y mantenimiento del sistema de riego, el mismo que se realiza generalmente por surcos, en curvas de nivel, siendo este método de riego el más generalizado. Los cultivos principales son maíz, cebada, fréjol y tomate, entre otros (ver Cuadro 2).Estructura agraria. La estructura agraria en la acequia Garrapatal, de 236 explotaciones agrícolas, están presentados en el Cuadro 5. La mayoría de los usuarios tiene una superficie entre 1 y 5 ha. La superficie promedia es 2.8 ha.Cuadro Error! Unknown switch argument.. La estructura agraria en la acequia Garrapatal.< Ubicación. La Acequia \"El Tambo\", está ubicada entre las coordenadas geográficas 0? 4`y 0? 35`de latitud norte y, 77? 57`y 78? 88`de longitud oeste. Comprende los sitios denominados El Tambo, Los Andes, San Pablo de la Cangahua y, las haciendas San Francisco y Tutapiz, pertenecientes a la parroquia García Moreno, del cantón Espejo y, al cantón Bolívar. El acceso a las zonas de riego se realiza a partir de la carretera El Angel-Bolívar, a la altura de la población de García Moreno. La población de El Tambo se une, mediante una carretera de segundo orden, a la carretera panamericana que une Ibarra-Bolívar (véase Mapa 2).Reseña histórica. De acuerdo a la información de los moradores del área, la acequia El Tambo, tiene más de cien años. Ningún usuario actual recuerda la construcción de la misma. De acuerdo a los relatos la acequia fue construída por las haciendas del sector que se extendían desde la población de El Angel hasta el río Chota. La construcción se realizó mediante \"mingas\", en las cuales participaban los peones y \"huasipungueros\" de las haciendas. En el Tambo se dió el mismo proceso de parcelamiento de las grandes haciendas antes del advenimiento de la Reforma Agraria, proceso que caracterizó a la provincia del Carchi. Los dueños de las haciendas parcelaron sus tierras entregando parte a los \"huasipungueros\" que habían trabajado para ellos y otra parte vendieron a partidarios y peones. En este caso también junto con las tierras obtuvieron el derecho al agua, en la parte proporcional que les correspondía. Los grupos de usuarios deciden formar cooperativas para organizarse y manejar los asuntos relacionados con el riego. En el año de 1972 aproximadamente se organiza la primera junta de la acequia El Tambo la cual es legalizada por la Agencia de Aguas.El sistema de riego. A este sistema de riego privado, la Agencia de Aguas de Ibarra concesionó 227 l/s. Para la captación del recurso agua, no se ha construído la bocatoma, en el sitio de concesión, en el río Bobo. Los usuarios colocan materiales (chambas y piedras), para llevar el flujo del agua hacia el inicio de la acequia. La conducción se inicia por la margen izquierda del río, tiene una sección media de 0.80 m. de ancho por 0.70 de altura. En el trayecto de la acequia están construídas algunas obras: muros de protección, secciones revestidas y embauladas, pasos vehiculares, pasos peatonales, derivaciones secundarias hacia las zonas de riego y, un acueducto. Es necesario realizar el mejoramiento y construcción de obras complementarias, para garantizar su funcionamiento (MBS-INERHI 1991).La conducción se inicia por la margen izquierda del cauce, hasta la zona de riego, mediante una acequia de 26.1 km de longitud, de los cuales 18.1 km corresponden al tramo del canal muerto y 8 km a las redes de distribución en el área de riego. El sistema de riego dispone de estructuras de derivación a nivel de módulos, las mismas que se encuentran en satisfactorio estado de mantenimiento.Este sistema de riego beneficia a varias zonas, que captan los recursos hídricos concesionados, en varias tomas a lo largo del canal principal. Esta circunstancia conspira con un normal y oportuno mantenimiento del sistema que debe compartirse con varios usuarios, que tienen la responsabilidad de financiar el costo de mantenimiento, independiente de su sector, de aproximadamente 44 km., correspondientes al canal principal.En el Cuadro 6 se presenta el número de usuarios, la superficie y el caudal concesionado para cada zona. La principal zona de riego es el área circundante a la población de El Tambo en la zona baja; está a 2.200 msnm.Organización. La Junta de la Acequia el Tambo está integrada por un total de doce directivos (presidente, vicepresidente, tesorero, secretario, síndico y siete vocales). De acuerdo a los estatutos, la junta se reúne periódicamente y cada año se elige la directiva en el mes de diciembre. Las principales atribuciones de la directiva son: cuidar y mantener la acequia, nombrar y remover a los empleados necesarios para la administración del canal, acordar y determinar las cuotas mensuales que deben contribuír los usuarios para la conservación, limpieza y reparaciones de la acequia y, determinar y hacer respetar los turnos de riego (Estatutos de la Acequia El Tambo). El directorio de la junta de usuarios se ha mantenido en ejercicio desde 1988. La razón es que han sido reelegidos sus miembros, fundamentalmente porque gran parte de los usuarios de la junta no asisten a las reuniones y al momento de las elecciones generalmente no existe el quórum (Estatutos, Acequia El Tambo).La distribución del agua. De forma parecida a la situación que presenta la acequia Garrapatal, el reparto del agua de riego se realiza de acuerdo a los turnos que fueron fijados en el año 1972. Estos turnos fueron legalizados por la Agencia de Aguas en Ibarra, bajo la asesoría de un técnico del INERHI. Los turnos se basan en el caudal del módulo, tiempo y la superficie regada. El criterio usado es el de conceder cuatro horas de uso del agua por hectárea mediante turnos cada siete días. En este caso también los turnos se basan en que el caudal adjudicado que discurre en el canal principal se distribuye en forma proporcional a la superficie de cada módulo (Cuadro 7).En esta acequia también se encuentra casos en los que no se respetan los turnos establecidos. Existe un grupo de aproximadamente 15 usuarios, conformado por antiguos \"huasipungueros\" de las haciendas, los cuales desconocen el reparto realizado en el año 72 y exigieron a la directiva de la junta de aguas de ese entonces que les permitan quedarse con el turno de agua que ellos recibían cuando aún eran parte de la hacienda. Por esta razón este grupo de usuarios reciben su turno desde el día sábado a las 12 del medio día hasta el día domingo 12 del medio día. Esta decisión ha sido respetada a lo largo de los años por los usuarios y las directivas, aunque no consta en los estatutos de la acequia. En cada una de las dos acequias se identificaron las zonas modulares de riego. Para la selección de cada una de las zonas se utilizó el criterio que cada zona tendría que tener su propio punto de entrega de agua , en tal manera que se podría fácilmente medir los gastos entregados a cada zona. Para la acequia Garrapatal se seleccionaron 6 zonas: las primeras dos en la parte alta y 4 en la parta baja de la acequia. También para la acequia El Tambo se seleccionaron 6 zonas de riego: 2 en la zona alta y 4 en la zona baja.Siete componentes forman parte de la estrategia de la investigación en campo, que se llevó a cabo en el verano de 1996:? Primero, con el propósito de establecer los volúmenes, gastos y láminas diarias que se han venido entregando a las tierras beneficiadas con el riego de las acequias Garrapatal y El Tambo, se instalaron en las bocatomas y en cada una de las entradas de las zonas mencionadas en Cuadro 5, reglas limnimétricas, en total 17. Las mismas fueron leídas por personal contratado, todos los días, en la mañana y en la tarde, desde el mes de julio de 1996 hasta el mes de marzo de 1997. Su propósito es conocer las descargas que diariamente se entregaban a los terrenos beneficiados, en los dos ciclos de riego: verano e invierno. Se presenta la ubicación de las zonas de riego y las reglas instaladas en las Figuras 3 y 4.Figura Error! Unknown switch argument.. Ubicación de los puntos de medición en la acequia Garrapatal.Figura Error! Unknown switch argument.. Ubicación de los puntos de medición en Jorge Sotomayor, et. al. la acequia El Tambo.Para conocer la relación entre la lectura diaria y el gasto, se calibraron todas las reglas y se calcularon 17 \"curvas de descarga\", 9 en la acequia El Tambo y 8 en la acequia Garrapatal. Para ello, se efectuaron 60 aforos, a diferentes alturas. La determinación de estas curvas, nos permite, junto a las lecturas diarias, establecer el gasto y las láminas diarias que efectivamente llegaron a nivel de cada zona. Los parámetros y coeficientes de cada curva gasto-lectura (Q-H) se presenta en Anexo 1. En el Anexo 2 se presenta un ejemplo del cálculo de la ecuación Q-H.? Segundo, se calculó la eficiencia de conducción en algunos tramos de la red.? Tercero, para cada zona de riego se establecieron los patrones de cultivo, que se vienen sembrando en las acequias Garrapatal y El Tambo, para los ciclos de verano (marzo-junio), e invierno (septiembre-abril). También, para poder calcular la productividad de cada zona, se obtuvo información sobre los rendimientos de cada cultivo y sus precios.? Cuarto, para obtener los requerimientos de agua de los cultivos en las zonas altas y bajas de las dos acequias, se utilizó el método indirecto CROPWAT. Este método fue desarrollado por la Organización Mundial de la Agricultura y la Alimentación (la FAO) y se basa en la fórmula de Penman-Montieth para estimar la evapotranspiración potenciál (ET 0 ) del cultivo (FAO 1996).? Quinto, para los datos climáticos se utilizó la información de las estaciones climáticas localizadas en San Gabriel (para la zona alta) e Ibarra (para la zona baja). Los datos mensuales usados fueron: precipitación, temperatura, radiación, humedad relativa y velocidad de vientos.? Sexto, se hicieron observaciones directas de las actividades relacionadas con el manejo del agua. En forma consistente se observaron la tareas realizadas por los aguateros y las juntas de regantes.? Séptimo, se entrevistaron a los presidentes, tesoreros y los secretarios de las juntas con motivo de captar información relacionada con la historia y la organización de las juntas, y también para captar información relacionada a la recaudación de las tarifas de agua.El IWMI usa un método estándard para cuantificar y medir el desempeño de los sistemas de riego y sus impactos agrícolas (productividad), económicos y ambientales. Para ello se usa un grupo de indicadores que están aplicados en todos los proyectos de investigación del instituto.Los indicadores son esencialmente externos. Haciendo una analogía, considerarse el sistema de riego como una caja negra al cual le entran insumos (agua, gastos de operación, recursos humanos, etc) y salen productos (rendimientos de los cultivos) que al venderlos generan un valor bruto de producción. Los indicadores, si se aplican juiciosa y extensamente, pueden dar la pauta para identificar que está funcionando bien y que funciona mal.Los indicadores usados para cada zona de riego investigada en el presente estudio son los siguientes:1. Disponibilidad Relativa del Agua (DRA), definido como: = El Total del Agua Suministrada (Riego + Precipitacion total) Demanda de Agua del CultivoEs una variable que relaciona el suministro total de agua al cultivo y la demanda del mismo, establecida en este caso por el CROPWAT. Es una variable adimensional. A fin de guiar al lector en el significado del DRA -a nivel parcelarioun valor de 1 correspondería a un cultivo al cual se la ha suministrado estrictamente los requerimientos de agua sin que haya habido lugar a pérdidas de agua en el proceso. Un valor menor de 1 significaría que no fue posible siquiera proporcionar lo requerido por el cultivo y valores muy bajos estarían asociados con bajos rendimientos. A medida que el valor de DRA se hace múltiple de 1 se estaría enfrentando una situación de abundancia del recurso con altas pérdidas en la acequia (Levine 1974 Es una variable que relaciona el suministro del agua de riego y la demanda de riego. La demanda de riego se calcula con la demanda del cultivo menos la precipitación efectiva. La precipitación efectiva es la parte de la precipitación total que es realmente usada por los cultivos en la parcela. Existen varios métodos de calcular la precipitación efectiva, y el programa CROPWAT permite tres opciones. El método mas apto para las condiciones climáticas y geográficas de la área del estudio, es el método desarrollado por el United States Bureau of Reclamation.Hay cuatro indicadores para calcular la productividad económica del (sub)sistema. La productividad se calcula tanto por unidad de superficie (actualmente regada y la que potencialmente se puede regar) como por unidad de agua (consumida y entregada). Todos los valores de producción son valores brutos, los cuales se calculan utilizando la siguiente fórmula:Valor Bruto de la Producción ($): = Producción Total (toneladas) * Precio del Producto ($/ton) Sin embargo, generalmente se siembra más de un cultivo en una zona. Por ello, hay que convertir los rendimientos (ton/ha) de todos los cultivos en Rendimientos Estandarizados. La estandarización de la producción consiste en llevar todos los rendimientos de los cultivos a un rendimiento equivalente al cultivo principal del área bajo estudio. Por ello, se utiliza la siguiente fórmula: La base de los cálculos de las demandas de agua y la producción, tanto por unidad de superficie come por unidad de agua, es el patrón de cultivos para los dos ciclos estudiados. En los Cuadros 9, 10, 11 y 12 se presentan los cuatro patrones de cultivos para todas las zonas de riego de las acequias Garrapatal y El Tambo. Analizando los cuadros 9 y 10 pueden harcerse las siguientes anotaciones:? El principal cultivo en las dos acequias es el fréjol.? En la acequia Garrapatal, el segundo cultivo en importancia es el maíz , junto con el fréjol cubren el 73% de la superficie sembrada. ? En la acequia El Tambo, al cultivo del fréjol, siguen en importancia el anís. ? En ambas acequias hay gran diversidad de cultivos, once en cada una. ? Hay mayor diversificación en las zonas bajas que en las altas, seguramente por razones climáticas. Analizando los cuadros 11 y 12 pueden harcerse las siguientes anotaciones:? El fréjol ocupa el primer lugar, tanto en la acequia Garrapatal como en El Tambo.? En la acequia Garrapatal , siguen en importancia los cultivos de maíz, junto al fréjol.? En la acequia El Tambo, el segundo cultivo en importancia, después del fréjol es el anís.En el Cuadro 13 se presenta los valores de requerimientos de agua para algunos cultivos y para los ciclos de verano 1996 e invierno 1996-97. A causa de las grandes diferencias climatológicas entre la zona alta y la zona baja (véase las Figuras 1 y 2), hubo que calcular los requerimientos para ambas zonas. Como ya hemos mencionado, los valores son obtenido por medio del programa CROPWAT. Estos valores constituyen el denominador en la fórmula de la DRA. Como es de esperarse, la demanda varía con el cultivo, con los valores para maíz y anís mayores en virtud de sus períodos vegetativos más largos, y con los valores para hortalizas menores. También, los valores en las zonas altas son un poco menores a los de las zonas bajas.Combinando los patrones de cultivo de cada zona con los requerimientos de cultivos mostrados en el Cuadro 13, se obtienen los volúmenes requeridos para cada zona y para cada ciclo. En los Cuadros 14 al 17 se presentan estos volúmenes brutos requeridos, tanto en términos de la demanda total para el ciclo (mm), como en l/s/ha y l/s para ambas acequias y ambos ciclos. El volumen neto es el volumen bruto menos la precipitación total. Para poder comparar los volúmenes netos requeridos con la dotación legalmente concesionada por la Agencia de Aguas en Ibarra, se convirtió la precipitación también a l/s. El volumen promedio requerido en la acequia Garrapatal es 482 mm para el ciclo de verano 1996. A consecuencia de la diferencia en el patrón de cultivo (más anís), ya que la mayoría de la zona regada está ubicada en la zona baja, el volumen requerido en El Tambo es mayor: 537 mm. Estos volúmenes corresponden a caudales de 130 l/s y 158 l/s para Garrapatal y El Tambo, respectivamente. Los volúmenes netos son aún mas bajos. La observación principal para el ciclo de verano, es que los volúmenes netos requeridos son siempre menores a las concesiones que teóricamente son entregados a las acequias y a cada una de sus zonas. Sin embargo, como mostraremos mas adelante, ello no necesariamente significará que los usuarios realmente están recibiendo las dotaciones concesionadas. También hay que recordar que las concesiones están determinadas a nivel de las bocatomas de las acequias y de las entradas de cada zona, mientras los volúmenes requeridos están calculados a nivel parcelario. Hay que considerar que las eficiencias de conducción y aplicación son generalmente muy bajas y que por ello se pierde mucho del volumen.La situación en el invierno es todavía mas favorable por causa de la precipitación, sobre todo en la zonas altas. En estas zonas la precipitación es mayor al requerimiento, lo cual significa que la necesidad para riego es mínima. En este ciclo la precipitación es mucho menor en las zonas bajas. Sin embargo, las dotaciones concesionadas superarían los volúmenes requeridos netos.Una vez analizados los requerimientos de los cultivos y las dotaciones teóricamente concesionadas y entregadas, se puede analizar si los volúmenes realmente entregados a las acequias y sus zonas son iguales a los requeridos y a los concesionados. Como ya se mencionó en la sección sobre la metodología aplicada en este estudio, se tomaron 2 lecturas diarias de cada una de las 17 reglas instaladas. Así se obtuvieron cada día los gastos y los volúmenes entregados a cada zona en las acequias. En los Cuadros 18 y 19 se presenta los volúmenes totales entregados para los ciclos de verano 1996 y invierno 1996-97 respectivamente. Para poder comparar los volúmenes entregados con las demandas de los cultivos y los caudales concesionadas, los 'volúmenes´ son convertidos en láminas de riego aplicadas, en l/s/ha y en l/s. El periodo de riego fue de 77 días en el verano y de 112 días en el invierno.La primera observación que se puede hacer del cuadro 18, es que la cantidad de agua suministrada por unidad de superficie a los usuarios en Garrapatal es casi el doble a la suministrada a El Tambo: en promedio 487 mm ( ó 0.7 l/s/ha) contra 249 mm (ó 0.4 l/s/ha). También se puede observar que los usuarios en las zonas bajas de las acequias reciben mucho menos agua que los que están en las zonas altas. Por ejemplo, la zona La Cocha en Garrapatal recibe 487 mm, mientras San Marcos, Playa Rica y Uyamá reciben 298 mm. La situación más crítica es en las zonas bajas de El Tambo (con excepción de Potrero Grande): El Tambito (la zona más grande de toda la acequia) solo recibe 43 mm, o 0.1 l/s/ha, lo cual es por ejemplo el 20% del caudal que recibe San Pablo de la Cangahua en la zona alta.Otra observación importante es que en general las zonas en Garrapatal reciben más agua que el volumen concesionado: en promedio 40% más. Las dos excepciones son San Nicolás y la Loma Seca. En el caso de El Tambo, la situación es el contrario: en general la acequia recibe solo el 57% de lo concesionado, mientras El Tambito solo recibe el 10%. La unica zona que recibe al menos el volumen concesionado es Potrero Grande. La situación en el invierno es parecida a la del verano, pero los contrastes entre algunas zonas parecen ser todavía más grandes. Otra vez, se puede observar que Garrapatal recibió cantidades de agua muy altas: hasta 1588 mm en La Providencia. Es interesante que las zonas bajas reciben volúmenes más altos que las zonas en la parte alta. La causa de este hecho es que los usuarios en las zonas altas casi no usan el agua de riego en el invierno a consecuencia de suficiente precipitación (véase Cuadro 16) y no usan el agua en sus parcelas. Este agua inutilizada pasa a las zonas que están mas bajas.El volumen entregado a la acequia Garrapatal es mucho mayor al volumen concesionado, mientras El Tambo recibe menos que su derecho. Las figuras 5 y 6 muestran que esta diferencia entre las dos acequias es consistente durante todo el año agrícola. Solo en la última semana del ciclo invierno el volumen entregado es menor al concesionado.En el caso de las acequia El Tambo solo hay dos o tres semanas en las cuales los volúmenes realmente entregados se acercan a los volúmenes concesionados. Una de las razones por las cuales en muchas zonas el volumen suministrado no alcanza el volumen concesionado (véaso Cuadros 18 y 19) es la baja eficiencia de conducción en la mayoría de los tramos de las acequias. En el Cuadro 20 se presentan las pérdidas del agua en algunos tramos. Las pérdidas son expresados tanto en porcentaje de la pérdida del gasto que entre en cada una de las zonas como en porcentaje del gasto total que entra en el primer punto de medición.El cuadro permite observar que las pérdidas en la red de conducción son muy altas en los tramos entre la Grandeza Nacional y La Providencia, y entre San Pablo de Cangauha y la entrada de la zona baja de El Tambo.En las dos secciones anteriores se analizó la relación entre los requerimientos de agua de los cultivos (total y de cada zona de riego) y los volúmenes concesionados. Igualmente, se analizó la relación entre el volumen concesionado y el realmente entregado. Ya se concluyó que, en general, teóricamente los volúmenes concesionados cubren los volúmenes requeridos. Si se consideran las bajas eficiencias de conducción, algunas zonas tendrían problemas en recibir suficiente agua con base a los volúmenes concesionados. También, se concluyó que en realidad, los volúmenes entregados difieren mucho de los volúmenes concesionados. Generalmente, en Garrapatal se recibe un caudal que es mucho mayor al concesionado, mientras en la acequia El Tambo se recibe apenas la mitad de lo concesionado.En la presente sección se analizará la relación entre los volúmenes requeridos y los suministrados. Para ello, se utiliza el primer indicador ya definido arriba: la disponibilidad relativa del agua (DRA). En los Cuadros 21 y 22 se presentan los tres parámetros del indicador (suministro de riego, precipitación y demanda del cultivo), más los valores de DRA, para cada zona estudiada. Los valores del DRA presentados en el Cuadro 21 nos muestran que los usuarios en las zonas altas de la acequia Garrapatal no tendrían problemas en recibir suficiente agua para cubrir los requerimientos de sus cultivos. Valores mayor de 1.5 les permiten a los usuarios que se pierda aproximadamente la mitad del agua entra la entrada a la zona y la parcela. Dependiendo de la distancia entra la entrada a la zona y la parcela, hasta un valor de 1.3 (como en el caso de la Providencia en San Pablo de Cangahua) podría ser suficiente para cubrir la demanda de agua. Tanto en las zonas bajas de Garrapatal como en todas las zonas de la acequia El Tambo, el suministro y la precipitación no son suficientes para alcanzar los requerimientos de los cultivos. El valor de 0.5 en el caso de la zona El Tambito (la cual es la zona regada mas grande de la acequia) significa que al nivel parcelario los usuarios solo recibe la mitad de la cantidad de agua requerida para obtener una producción óptima. Con la excepción de San Marcos, Playa Rica y Uyamá, las zonas de Garrapatal no tuvieron problemas en alcanzar sus demandas del agua en el ciclo invierno. En la parte alta, la precipitación sería suficiente para los cultivos sembrados. Los valores altos de la Providencia y Loma Seca muestran que los cultivos reciben aproximademente tres veces la cantidad el agua (riego mas precipitación) requerida. Aunque las zonas de San Pablo de Cangahua y San Francisco no tuvieron problemas, la zona baja de la acequia El Tambo no recibió suficiente agua para cubrir sus demandas. Igual que en el ciclo de verano esta zona solo recibio la mitad del agua requerida para su cultivos.La Disponibilidad Relativa del Riego (DRR) es un indicador my relacionado al DRA y trata de hacer una corrección debido al aporte que la precipitación hace al requerimiento del agua de riego. Es útil porque deja entrever el manejo mismo que se hace del riego. Valores cercanos a la unidad (1) sugieren buen manejo, mientras que valores altos y muy bajos indicarían mala utilización del agua de riego disponible, o escasez de esta. Se presentan los valores de DRR para el verano y el invierno en los Cuadros 23 y 24, respectivamente. Los valores de DRR en los cuadros 23 y 24 son consistentes con lo expresado con el indicador DRA. La acequia Garrapatal tiene mayor disponibilidad de agua que la de El Tambo, tanto en el verano como en el invierno. Los valores cercanos a 2 y mayores en el Garrapatal sugieren que no dependen tanto del agua de riego y de hecho ya vimos que en las partes altas simplemente la dejan pasar. Los valores del Tambo, mas cercanos a la unidad, sugieren que el agua es mas escasa y que los usuarios tratan de aprovecharla al maximo. En el caso de la zona baja del Tambito la falta de agua es aparente.En las secciones anteriores se analizaron el sumistro del agua en relación con la demanda de los cultivos y las dotaciones concesionadas. En este respecto, la conclusión general es que en las zonas bajas de las dos acequias el suministro no es suficiente para alcanzar los requerimientos de los cultivos, y que la situación del riego suministrado es más critica en el ciclo de verano que el en invierno. Para poder evaluar los impactos de la escasez del agua en la producción agrícola, el IWMI utiliza algunos indicadores, los cuales ya fueron definidos en la sección sobre la metodología del estudio. En los Cuadros 25 y 26 se presenta los rendimientos y los valores brutos de la producción estandarizados. Estos últimos están calculados por unidad de superficie realmente regada y potencialmente regable. También se calcularon los valores por unidad de agua realmente suministrada , y por unidad de agua consumida por los cultivos. Para poder comparar los rendimientos y los valores de la producción entre zonas que tienen patrones de cultivos distintos, todos los rendimientos fueron convertidos a rendimientos equivalentes de fréjol.Aunque en el verano de 1996 el rendimiento promedio de fréjol fue aproximadamente de 0.8 toneladas por ha, debido a otros cultivos con rendimientos y precios mayores a los de fréjol, los rendimientos equivalentes son alrededor de 1.2 ton/ha. Las zonas con rendimientos más altos son las zonas que sembraron relativamente mucha arveja (Loma Seca) o anís (Torrealba y Potrero Grande) (véase Cuadros 9 y 10).El promedio del valor bruto de la producción estandarizada en el verano es alrededor de S/. 4.500.000 por hectárea en Garrapatal y 4.900.000 en el caso de El Tambo 3 . Desafortunadamente, por falta de estudios parecidos, no es posible comparar estos valores con los de otros sistemas de riego en Ecuador. Comparación con algunos valores obtenidos en otros países sugiere, por ejemplo, que los valores obtenidos en las dos acequias son el doble de los valores en algunos sistemas privados en el estado de Guanajuato en México (Dayton-Johnson 1997), parecidos a los del grande Distrito de Riego Alto Río Lerma en México (Kloezen 1997;Kloezen y Garcés 1997) o el Distrito RUT en Colombia (Alvarez 1997), pero mucho menor a los de los tres distritos colombianos de Samacá (Mora Peña 1997), Coello y Saldaña (Vermillion y Garcés 1996).El valor más bajo es él de la zona de Grandeza Nacional (en donde se siembra mucho maíz, lo cual tiene un precio relativamente bajo). Los valores más altos se obtienen en Torrealba y Potrero Grande, debido al buen precio para el anís. Dado que muchos usuarios no siembran toda la superficie de sus parcelas, generalmente los valores por unidad de la superficie regada son menores a los valores por unidad de superficie regable .Los valores de producción por unidad de riego suministrado en el Tambo son más que el doble que en el caso de Garrapatal. Como está analizado arriba, El Tambo recibe mucho menos agua, lo cual significa que (con el mismo rendimiento) el valor por unidad de agua recibido es más alto. Debido al alto porcentaje de fréjol sembrado en lugar de los cultivos que tiene mejor rendimientos y precios, los rendimientos equivalentes para el ciclo de invierno son generalmente menores a los del verano. La mayoría de los usuarios en Grandeza Nacional y San Pablo de Cangahua sembraron maíz, lo cual explica el bajo rendimiento equivalente en estas zonas (véase Cuadros 11 y 12). Las zonas con anís obtuvieron rendimientos equivalentes a fréjol más altos ya que el precio de mercado para anís es más alto que el de fréjol: S/.4,615,000 por tonelada para fréjol y S/. 9,011,000 por tonelada para anís en el invierno 1996-97. Sin embargo, hay que mencionar que los costos de la producción para anís son más altos que para fréjol o maíz (Cuadro 27). Los valores brutos de la producción por unidad de superficie (regada y regable) son menores en el invierno que en el verano. Los valores de producción por unidad de agua suministrada en el invierno son mucho menor a los del verano porque hubo más riego. En la Figura 7 se presenta la relación entre los valores de DRA y los valores brutos de producción estandarizados para verano 1996. Aunque la muestra de las dos acequias con 12 zonas es demasiada pequeña para poder hacer un análisis estadístico confiable, los valores presentados en la figura sugieren que no hay ninguna relación entre la disponibilidad del agua y el valor de la producción (R 2 = 0.05). Este sugiere que los usuarios son muy capaces de adaptar sus patrones de cultivos al nivel de escasez de agua en sus zonas.Acequia Garrapatal. Las tarifas de agua que cobra la junta general a todos los usuarios se destinan para el pago del aguatero general de la acequia, quién labora únicamente dos días a la semana controlando que el paso del agua en la acequia sea normal. Anualmente la junta paga un total de S/.1,440,000 de tarifa fija por concepto de aguatero. Este valor se divide proporcionalmente a los litros de agua que recibe cada zona y que es recaudado por cada subjunta. Para el mantenimiento de la acequia se realiza una limpia general anual en el mes de agosto. Cada subjunta esta encargada de organizar los trabajos correspondientes a su tramo, cobrando una cuota de S/.15,000 /ha a cada usuario o controlando que el usuario ponga un día de trabajo por hectárea regada. De igual forma todas y cada una de las subjuntas de usuarios están en la obligación de mantener su tramo de acequia en buenas condiciones durante el resto del año. En el caso de que los daños en el canal sean demasiado grandes y por lo tanto costosos, previa verificación de la Directiva Central de la Acequia, todas la subjuntas están en la obligación de aportar con la mano de obra que se necesite o aportar con el equivalente en dinero correspondiente de acuerdo a los litros de agua que recibe cada zona. En el año 1996 hubo dos casos de cuotas extraordinarias relacionados con daños en la acequia. La subjunta de Grandeza Nacional invirtió S/. 713,000 para reparar el canal principal en el tramo La Cocha-Grandeza Nacional.En abril de 1996 se destruyeron 15 metros del labio inferior del canal en el tramo Grandeza Nacional-Loma Seca.. Su reparación mediante la construcción de un muro de contención significó una inversión de S/. 3,000,000, monto que fue cubierto por todas las subjuntas mediante una cuota extraordinaria.Como está mostrado en el Cuadro 28, el costo anual total por usuario es bajo: en promedio S/. 23,800 por hectárea por año, lo cual significa menos que 1% del valor bruto de la producción. Este sugiere que la tarifa de riego no es un gran obstáculo financiero para los usuarios. Sin embargo, la deuda total de las subjuntas para los conceptos de aguatero (tarifa fija), mantenimiento y cobros anteriores es S/. 3,386,000, o sea en promedio alrededor de S/.14,700 por usuario o S/.5,600 por hectárea (Cuadro 29). Esta significa que la deuda acumulada es el 23% de la recaudación planeada de un año completo.Cuadro Error! Unknown switch argument.. La tarifa de riego (S/. x 1,000) para la acequia Garrapatal, 1997. Uno de los principales problemas para la adecuada administración de la acequia es la morosidad en el pago de las tarifas fijas y extraordinarias. En la mayoría de los casos no todos los usuarios pagan estas cuotas y la acequia se mantiene con el esfuerzo de unos pocos usuarios Al momento del estudio, las cuentas de tesorería se encontraban actualizadas hasta diciembre de 1995. Un análisis realizado de lo ocurrido para el período junio a diciembre de 1995 demostró que hubo una cartera vencida por S/.10'455.000, la cual corresponde con aproximadamente 40% de la recaudación planeada anual. Algo similar ocurre con el pago de la cuota correspondiente a la quinta parte de los gastos de operación que deben cubrir cada una de las haciendas Tutapíz y San Francisco. Las mismas que hasta diciembre de 1995 deben S/. 4,218.000 y S/. 2,563,.000 respectivamente (Cuadro 31). ? Desestabilización morfodinámica y degradación de suelos. Este impacto es particularmente importante en las áreas aledañas, a las zonas planas o levemente onduladas, que tienen una pendiente mayor al 15%, cuyos procesos erosivos son acelerados, especialmente en terrenos desnudos y de granulometrías gruesas y, dentro de las zonas planas, las áreas regadas, que por efecto de las malas prácticas de aprovechamiento hidroagrícola, son susceptibles a procesos acelerados de erosión hídrica, laminar y en cárcavas. Este impacto se ha incrementado por la ampliación de la zona agrícola, hacia áreas de fuerte pendiente y alta inestabilidad morfodinámica, por la utilización de riego por surcos, en áreas de ladera, que favorecen el proceso erosivo y, la labranza en el sentido de la pendiente, que aunque no es generalizado, se presenta en ciertos sectores.Es innegable que la utilización del riego por surcos está contribuyendo a un proceso de erosión muy acelerado y más aún en terrenos de fuerte declive dedicados a la explotación de cultivos de escarda; esta situación se agudiza con el advenimiento del invierno, en cuya época se precipita entre el 72 y el 79 %, (octubre-abril) de la lluvia anual; este fenómeno atmosférico es el causante de la presencia, en las partes altas de las laderas, de cárcavas, cuyos efectos erosivos afectan a los terrenos bajos, planos a levemente ondulados, destinados a la producción, situados al pie de las laderas ? Deterioro de la calidad del agua de riego. Un aspecto importante es la contaminación que tienen las aguas de riego, no por efecto de la operación del sistema, sino por la presencia de efluentes químicos por la utilización indiscriminada de pesticidas y el vertido de aguas servidas, de la poblaciones aledañas. El análisis realizado a las aguas de las acequias Garrapatal y El Tambo, determinan que no son aptas para el consumo humano, por la excesiva presencia de coliformes (2.400 y 1.500 NMP/ml, respectivamente) y muy alto contenido de mohos (40 y 15 UFC/ml, respectivamente). Sin embargo, no teniendo otras fuentes de aprovisionamiento de agua potable, son utilizadas las aguas que discurren en los sistemas de riego.Se observa, a lo largo del canal principal, el uso que los usuarios, en este caso las mujeres, hacen del agua, para lavar la ropa, aseo personal y desechos sólidos, contribuyendo a generar problemas en la zona especialmente de orden sanitario como brotes de cólera y epidemias gastrointestinales.La relación entre el uso de los recursos ambientales existentes y el mantenimiento de la productividad de los ecosistemas en una perspectiva futura, demuestra que las tareas de utilización de los recursos de agua y suelo por los beneficiarios, de los sistemas de riego en la cuenca del Mira no contribuyen ni se orientan a los objetivos mencionados. Entre otros, la utilización de cultivos de escarda, la generalización de riego por superficie (en terrenos muy arenosos y de pendiente pronunciada) y la limitada incorporación de materia orgánica (en suelos altamente permeables) con tasas de infiltración elevadas, está especialmente grave en las áreas bajas de la subcuenca.? El estudio demostró que no es aconsejable hacer planes de distribución de riego (tanto a nivel acequia como a nivel de las zonas) basados en los volúmenes concesionados ya que los volúmenes reales fluctúan considerablemente. Por ejemplo, durante el periodo del estudio los caudales reales en la acequia Garrapatal siempre superaron a la concesión. En la acequia El Tambo sucedió exactamente lo contrario.? Tanto el indicador DRA como el DRR demuestran que algunas zonas de riego no reciben suficiente agua para suplir los requerimientos de los cultivos. Como podría esperarse, los déficits en el verano son mayores que en el invierno. La acequias Garrapatal tiene relativamente mas agua que la acequia El Tambo. Hay una tendencia de mayor disponibilidad de agua en las zonas altas sobre las bajas.? La pérdidas por conducción son relativamente altas en ambas acequias. Las pérdidas en diferentes tramos aparecen aumentar de la cabeza hacia la cola en ambas acequias. Esta situación podría aliviarse con un buen esfuerzo en el mantenimiento de tramos a especificar por parte de los usuarios.? Un estudio del balance hídrico a nivel de la cuenca del Río Mira (que incluya la subcuenca del río Angel) debe realizarse a fin de obtener una mejor información sobre la disponibilidad de agua en la región, en general, y en particular en las subcuencas que alimentan las 11 acequias privadas del área de estudio. Solo así podrá llegarse al diseño de un plan integral de manejo de aguas en la zona.? Los rendimientos económicos en las diferentes zonas de riego en ambas acequias son sorprendentemente mayores que la percepción que se tiene en la zona sobre la rentabilidad agrícola. Además, el estudio mostró que los usuarios en las zonas con escasez de agua relativamente altos, adaptaron sus patrones de cultivos para poder obtener valores brutos de la producción parecidos a aquellos que tienen mejor acceso al agua.? Un estudio mas profundo sobre el valor económico del recurso agua a medida que se desciende del páramo contribuiría a explicar mejor los cambios en los patronos de cultivo que se observan en toda la zona y permitiría establecer mecanismos para distribuir mejor el agua en acorde con los requerimientos de los cultivos.? El desarrollo institucional de las juntas de regantes necesita reforzarse. La poca dependencia del riego para la producción de los cultivos, especialmente en las partes altas de las acequias, no han permitido consolidar las organizaciones de regantes. Prácticamente se ha dejado la responsabilidad de la gestión administrativa de los sistemas de riego a la Directiva, que poco puede hacer, sin la colaboración permanente de los beneficiarios.? El régimen tarifario que se ha implantado en las dos acequias no es suficiente para solucionar los problemas existentes como rehabilitar la infraestructura y garantizar una adecuada y oportuna operación y mantenimiento del sistema. Aunque en costo de los servicios de riego (por concepto de los aguateros, el mantenimiento y las reparaciones) es muy bajo (menos que 1% del valor bruto de la producción), la tasa de recaudación de la tarifa es baja. Como consecuencia de ello, la morosidad en el pago de las tarifas es uno de los principales problemas en ambas acequias.? Es necesario profundizar en los aspectos organizativos e institucionales de las asociaciones de regantes de las diferentes acequias a fin de entender mejor su funcionamiento en lo que se refiere propiamente al riego. De especial interés sería la problemática que enfrentan en lo referente a tarifas de agua, acción colectiva en el mantenimiento de las acequias y el papel y responsabilidades de los miembros.? Las acequias Garrapatal y El Tambo tienen una infraestructura de riego incompleta. Por ello, es aconsejable la rehabilitación y complementación de la infraestructura de riego en las dos acequias. Para poder mejor esta situación, una asistencia técnica y crediticia a los usuarios de las acequias es necesaria y debe ser permanente.? El estudio presentó resultados muy diferentes en cuanto a la disponibilidad de las aguas aunque altas pérdidas en el sistema de conducción parece ser un problema común. Siguiendo la misma metodología empleada debe establecerse en forma rápida la situación en las otras acequias a fin de sentar prioridades en la rehabilitación de puntos críticos en la red de riego de las respectivas acequias."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2740106964.json b/main/part_2/2740106964.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bab05a6d5e86cb00c6c0633553bd62ade7145819 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2740106964.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d753d7b817ce0f4331961123444d3dbb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7c0c90b5-9a67-4684-8cf7-16a1082750ee/retrieve","id":"-1630205344"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b7dbb054-5ead-4dee-ad88-b4f714c75417","content":"The information in this guide can be freely reproduced for non-commercial use, if credited as coming from CTA.Reproduction for commercial use requires prior authorization from CTA.allowing it to soak into the soil. Excess water drains around the tips, where it can be caught in more hoops further down the slope.The size of the hoops can vary from small (2 metres across) to large (60 metres across). The smaller hoops can be used to grow better crops, shrubs and trees. The larger ones can be used to grow better grass or fodder and also help in rangeland rehabilitation.There are different methods of harvesting rainwater suited to different uses. For example, water for domestic use can be harvested from roofs using gutters and stored in underground or raised tanks. Water for irrigation can be harvested using canals and stored in pits, tanks or dams. But water for rain-fed crop or pasture production can simply be harvested and stored in the soil for use by the crop -that is by using semi-circular hoops. Use of semi-circular hoops is the recommended method for harvesting rainwater for pasture production in dry areas because it is simple and cheaper.They are suitable in dry areas where rainfall is too low for reliable growing of crops or good-quality pasture but can still cause erosion. Runoff and erosion can occur even where there is very little rainfall. For hoops to work, the land needs to have a gentle slope (ideally about 3%) but they can also be used on land with a steeper gradient if spaced closer together. They can also be used on most types of soils, but are unsuitable for use on cracking clays. Gradients can be assessed using an A-frame -your local extension officer can assist you if necessary.1What is rainwater harvesting?It is the collection and concentration of runoff water from the land surface before it is lost to a stream or river. Rainwater harvesting makes more water available for agricultural, household or other needs.• In dry areas rainfall is low (less than 700 mm a year) and poorly distributed. • Available rainfall is not enough to support growth of many crops or good quality pasture. • Most of the rainwater is lost as runoff due to lack of vegetation cover. • Runoff can cause erosion and loss of soil.Simple methods are available that reduce runoff, prevent erosion and allow more time for rainfall to soak into the soil and be available to crops and pasture. This process is called rainwater (or runoff) harvesting.This leaflet describes one method of rainwater harvesting -using hoops. This method is particularly suited to pasture production in dry areas.They are raised earth structures (bunds) constructed as semi-circles on gently sloping land. They are made so that the tips of the bunds or hoops point up the slope and are on the same level with the contour line. The hoops capture rainwater that runs down the slope,What are the benefits?Harvesting water using hoops has many benefits. These include:• increased pasture production • more productive and healthier livestock • increased milk production • extra income from sale of hay and grass seeds • reduced erosion and soil loss • simple and affordable method • ordinary skills and simple tools.• Land with a gentle slope • Tools: hoes (jembes), forks, spades, machetes (pangas) • Labour • Desire to increase pasture production • Suitable pasture seeds, such as Cenchrus ciliaris, Eragrostis superba or Digitaria macroblephara. For pasture species suitable for your area, consult your local extension officer.A rough position for a semicircular hoop can be found using only your eyes -in the same way you may be able to identify the correct position for a bench terrace. If you are not sure how to do this, ask your local extension officer.3 4Step 1:Use a hoe (jembe) and start from the contour line. Dig shallowly in a semi-circle, throwing the soil on the lower side (downhill slope). The hoop should be about 30 cm high in the middle, gradually decreasing in height and reaching ground level at the tips.Step 2:Construct a series of hoops in this way along a contour line to form a row. The distance between two hoops in a row should be slightly less than the width of one hoop.Step 3:Make another row of hoops, 4.5 metres below the first row. The second row of hoops is placed in line with the gaps in the first row (see diagram).Step 4:Continue making hoops in this way until the intended area is covered.Step 5:Sow grass and legume seeds recommended by your extension officer. Grass should be sown inside the hoop and legumes, such as cowpeas, inside and on top of the hoop. A crop of cowpeas can be harvested during the first season.Step 6:Before grazing or making hay, allow grass to grow for 2 wet seasons or until the pasture is well established (a uniform and continuous stand of grass 30 cm high or taller).Livestock or wild animals damage hoops They fenced the area to protect it from stray animals and, when the grasses matured, harvested the seeds and used them to expand the area planted with the new grasses.Thanks to their increased grass production, they were able to increase their herd from six to 12 indigenous zebu and saw daily milk production double to 2 litres per cow. They were able to save from their increased income and bought an additional 9 hectares of land.They have now planted a total of 11 hectares with the improved grass. On average they harvest 120 bales of hay per hectare each year. They use a simple hay-box method and store the bales under shade. The hay is used for their own animals and they also sell the surplus to neighbouring farmers for US$2.85 per bale. In addition, they rent grazing land to other farmers and harvest more than 100 kg of grass seeds each year, which they sell for US$4.30 per kg.The Ngayas are a happy family. The demand for their hay and seed exceeds their supply. They now plan to build more semi-circular hoops and plant the remaining part of their land with the new grasses."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2756107806.json b/main/part_2/2756107806.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4a84edba9fcdbef8485907386f1b8e5bfc8b251 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2756107806.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"95bd70879c36331609213eae4743617f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://www.int-res.com/articles/meps_oa/m442p071.pdf","id":"714894990"},"keywords":["Habitat suitability modelling","Niche modelling","Marine ecosystems","Macrofauna","Benthic communities","North Sea"],"sieverID":"f5a59fcd-d195-4350-bc3b-e4c6c91d58f4","content":"Species distribution models (SDMs) were applied to predict the distribution of benthic species in the North Sea. An understanding of species distribution patterns is essential to gain insight into ecological processes in marine ecosystems and to guide ecosystem management strategies. Therefore, we compared 9 different SDM methods, including GLM, GBM, FDA, SVM, RF, MAXENT, BIOCLIM, GARP and MARS, by using 10 environmental variables to model the distribution of 20 marine benthic species. Most of the models showed good or very good performance in terms of predictive power and accuracy, with highest mean area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.845 and 0.840, obtained for the MAXENT and GBM models, respectively. The poorest performance was shown by the BIOCLIM model, which had a mean AUC of 0.708. Nevertheless, the mapped distribution patterns varied remarkably depending on the model used, with up to 32.5% differences in predictions between models. For species with a narrow distribution range, the models showed a better performance based on the AUC than for species with a broad distribution range, which can most likely be attributed to the restricted spatial scale and the model evaluation procedure. Of the environmental variables, bottom water temperature and depth had the greatest effect on the distribution of 14 benthic species, based on MAXENT results. We examine the potential utility of this strategy for predicting future distribution of benthic species in response to climate change.Knowledge of the spatial distribution of species and communities in ecosystems is an essential prerequisite for the understanding of ecosystem functioning and processes as well as conservation and spatial planning issues. Especially in the marine environment, where fauna is more difficult to access and monitor than in terrestrial systems, these requirements are often addressed with fragmentary information about the species and habitats. Therefore, predictive methods became important to overcome these problems (Guisan & Zimmermann 2000, Guisan & Thuiller 2005). Species distribution models (SDMs), also known as habitat suitability models, ecological niche models or bioclimatic envelopes, are correlative approaches that use full spatial coverage data of environmental variables to explain patterns of species distribution (Elith & Graham 2009). Terrestrial ecology uses these statistical and machine-learning methods to predict species distribution not only for conservation and management purposes, but also for forecasting the effects of environmental or climate change (Guisan & Thuiller 2005, Heikkinen et al. 2006, Pompe et al. 2008, Elith & Leathwick 2009, Kharouba et al. 2009).The application of SDMs in the marine environment is recent (Robinson et al. 2011), stimulated by increasing availability of large-scale environmental data, better understanding of the relationship be tween environmental variables and species distribution, and the need for prognostic tools to predict changes in species distribution in response to environmental or climatic changes (Degraer et al. 2008, Glockzin et al. 2009, Gogina et al. 2010). Given the need for ecosystem-based fisheries management, most recent studies using SDMs in marine ecosystems have focussed on the distribution of commercial fish species (Venables & Dichmont 2004, Maxwell et al. 2009, Moore et al. 2010, Lenoir et al. 2011). In contrast, few studies have applied SDMs to the distribution of marine invertebrate benthos. Ysebaert et al. (2002) used logistic regression to model benthic species distribution in the Westerschelde estuary in the Netherlands, and Thrush et al. (2003) and Ellis et al. (2006) modelled the distribution of macrobenthic species in New Zealand estuaries with a similar ap proach. In the North Sea, most studies applying SDMs were carried out on a local scale, such as polychaete distribution in the German Bight using multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS; Meißner et al. 2008), as well as community type and polychaete distribution in Belgium waters using discriminant function analysis, and artificial neural networks plus generalized linear models (GLMs), respectively (Degraer et al. 2008, Willems et al. 2008). Gogina et al. (2010) and Gogina & Zettler (2010) also modelled macrobenthic patterns in the Baltic Sea using GLMs.The North Sea is one of the most intensively exploited and studied marine ecosystems in the world. The shelf sea area is characterised by high (seasonal) fluctuations of environmental variables in the shallower southern parts and less variable conditions in deeper waters towards the north. The increasing anthropogenic pressures on the entire North Sea, such as commercial fisheries, aquaculture, wind farms and transport routes, result in an urgent need for effective spatial marine planning and management to minimise adverse effects on the ecosystem. The benthic fauna is an important ecosystem component, playing a vital role in nutrient cycling and detrital decomposition. As a food source for higher trophic levels and a consumer of primary producers and other first order consumers, it is affected by bottomup and top-down processes. Intensive studies in the last decades on the importance of different environmental factors in structuring benthic communities and species distribution in the North Sea show that food availability, sediment structure, and hydrody-namic regime influence distribution on various spatial scales (e.g. Callaway et al. 2002, Wieking & Kröncke 2003, Reiss et al. 2010). Nevertheless, full coverage predictions of species and community distribution for the entire North Sea area are lacking.Therefore, the objectives of this study are (1) to apply and compare several species distribution modelling methods on marine benthos and (2) to predict the distribution of selected characteristic and dominant macrobenthic species of the North Sea. This is the first study of modelling benthic species distribution for the entire North Sea area.The benthic species data were extracted from the benthic data sets of the ICES North Sea Benthos Project 2000 (NSBP 2000) and the EU Project Managing Fisheries to Conserve Groundfish and Benthic Invertebrate Species Diversity (MAFCONS). Only infaunal samples with grabs or corers were used in this study, representing 1820 stations for the entire North Sea area for the period 2000 to 2004. Details of sampling and sample processing are given by Rees et al. (2007) and Callaway et al. (2007). Based on previous studies of North Sea benthic communities (e.g. Rees et al. 2007, Reiss et al. 2010, Kröncke et al. 2011), we selected 20 characteristic or dominant benthic species that represented rare species as well as widely and narrowly distributed species.A set of environmental data were selected and further resampled by bilinear interpolation to a resolution of 0.6 arc-minutes with ArcGIS 9.3 (ESRI), R (R Development Core Team 2009) and ERDAS Imagine 9.1 (ERDAS).Sediment data were collected during the sampling campaigns of the NSBP 2000 and the MAFCONS projects. As sampling processing was not standardised for NSBP 2000, the datasets for which fractional data were available were reprocessed to yield uniformly calculated means, sorting coefficients and descriptive assessments, which we then analysed in GRADI-STAT, Version 4.0 (Blott & Pye 2001). The granulometry of the MAFCONS samples was determined with a Laser Particle Sizer ('Analysette 22 Economy', Fritsch) for mud content and median grain size (for details see Callaway et al. 2007). All sediment data were compiled and interpolated to the entire area by inverse distance weighting.Depth data were derived from the General Bathymetric Charts of the Oceans (GEBCO) global bathymetry data set from the British Oceanographic Data Centre with a spatial resolution of a 1 arc-minute grid (GEBCO 2003).Data on temperature, salinity and primary production were provided by the Institute of Oceanography (Hamburg, Germany). Bottom temperature and salinity were derived from the hydrodynamic Hamburg Shelf Ocean Model (HAMSOM), a 3-dimensional, baro clinic primitive equation model for simulations of oceanic and coastal and shelf sea dynamics (Backhaus 1985). The model's horizontal resolution is 12' of latitude and 20' of longitude with a maximum vertical resolution of 19 layers. For details on the specific HAMSOM application see Pohlmann (1996). Instead of using annual mean values, data from the months of February and June 2000 were used for the distribution modelling to reflect the general seasonal patterns of temperature and salinity in the North Sea.Annual primary production data of the water column for the year 2000 were based on the ECOlogical North Sea Model HAMburg (ECOHAM1). The ECO-HAM1 model can calculate annual and long-term phytoplankton dynamics, nutrient transport and primary productivity for shelf seas in a 3-dimensional physical environment (Skogen & Moll 2005). The horizontal grid size of the numerical model is 20 × 20 km and the vertical resolution is 5 m for the upper 50 m with increasing layer thickness below 50 m up to a maximum of 19 layers. The ECOHAM1 model was validated using observed chlorophyll (Moll 1998), phosphate concentrations (Moll 2000) and primary production values (Skogen & Moll 2000).Chlorophyll a pigment concentrations were provided by the Marine and Coastal Information Services (MarCoast) project, based on remote sensing images derived from the Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS). The concentration of chlorophyll a was derived from the sea surface between 2 to 15 m water depth, depending on the turbidity of the water (for details see ESA 2006). Mean values for the period February to April 2008 and 2009 were used in this study to cover the spatial extent of the characteristic spring phytoplankton bloom in this region.Data on peak wave stress and stratification were provided by the Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory (Liverpool, UK) and generated using a 3-dimensional hydrodynamic model (Davies & Aldridge 1993). Peak wave stress was calculated from a 1 yr model run covering the period September 1999 to September 2000, on an approximately 12 km grid, using the Wave Analysis Model spectral wave model run at the Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory (Osuna & Wolf 2005). The stratification parameter 'S' was derived from the formulation presented by Pingree & Griffiths (1978), using modelled M2 tidal velocities and measured depths.The different models were trained using the Maxent v3.3.3a software for the maximum entropy model (MAXENT) (Phillips et al. 2006), the R environment software with the BIOMOD package 1.1-5 for GLMs, generalised boosting models (GBM), MARS, random forests (RF) and mixture discriminant analysis (MDA = FDA) (Thuiller 2003, R Development Core Team 2009), and the openModeller 1.0.9 framework for the Bioclimatic Envelope (BIOCLIM), the genetic algorithm for rule-set prediction (GARP) and the Support Vector Machines (SVM) (Muñoz et al. 2011). The models were trained using 1000 and 10 000 pseudoabsence points in BIOMOD/openModeller and MAX-ENT, respectively.MAXENT. MAXENT estimates a target probability distribution by finding the probability distribution of maximum entropy (i.e. that is most spread out, or closest to uniform) and constraining the expected value of each environmental variable to match its empirical average (Phillips et al. 2006). For presenceonly species distribution modelling, MAXENT fits an unknown probability distribution within the environmental space defined by the input variable to the pixel values of known species occurrence records. The unknown probability distribution is proportional to the probability of occurrence (Elith et al. 2006(Elith et al. , 2011)).GLM. GLMs are regression-type models closely related to the statistical methods used in linear modelling and analysis of variance. GLM not only uses linear relationships be tween response and predictor variables, it also uses parametric functions such as a combination of linear, quadratic or cubic terms. An automatic stepwise procedure generates the best model by minimizing the Akaike information criterion (AIC). This stepwise procedure removes redundancy in variables and reduces multicollinearity (Thuiller 2003, Thuiller et al. 2009).GBM. GBM fits a large number of 'simple' models and combines the prediction to generate a robust response estimate. In GBM, each individual model consists of classification or regression trees, also called boosted regression trees (BRT). In an iterative process a final model develops by progressively adding trees, while re-weighting the data poorly predicted by the previous tree (for more details see Ridgeway 2007, Elith et al. 2008). Prior to modelling, we defined 3000 trees as a basis for fitting.MARS. Compared to other methods based on linear relationships, where the coefficients remain constant across different levels of environmental variables, the MARS approach identifies and estimates a model whose coefficients differ depending on the level of the predictor variable. It combines linear regression, mathematical construction of splines and binary re cursive partitioning to model linear or nonlinear relationships between environmental variables and species occurrence (Friedman 1991).RF. RF is a classification and re gression model that generates multiple classification trees with a randomised subset of predictors. The number of predictors used for the best split at each tree branch is a random subset of predictors, and trees are aggregated by averaging (Prasad et al. 2006). In this study we used 500 trees.BIOCLIM. BIOCLIM is an envelope model that uses mean and standard deviation for each environmental variable to calculate bioclimatic envelopes (Busby 1986, Nix 1986). Only species presence data are required. Points are classified as suitable if all associated environmental values fall within the calculated envelopes, marginal if one or more associated environmental value falls outside the calculated envelope, but still within the upper and lower limits, and unsuitable if one or more associated environmental value falls outside the upper and lower limits. The categorical output of BIOCLIM is given as probabilities of 1.0, 0.5 and 0.0, respectively.GARP. GARP is a machine-learning approach using a ge netic algorithm to select a set of rules (e.g. logistic regression, bioclimatic rules) that best predict the species distribution (Stockwell & Peters 1999). We have applied the 'best subset' procedure implemented in openModeller, which selects the best models based on omission and commission error statistics (Peterson et al. 2007). A general description and technical details of the GARP modelling approach have been provided by Stockwell & Peters (1999).SVM. SVM is a machine-learning method that belongs to a family of generalised linear classifiers. To estimate the potential distribution of a species subject to the environmental conditions, the eco-space (spanned by the en vironmental variables) is separated by a hyperplane into 2 target classes (Guo et al. 2005): suitable and unsuitable environmental conditions. The optimality criterion used to find the separating hyperplane is maximised distance to the (nearest) training data points (large margin separation). With the help of a kernel function, the data points (representing known presence and absence records in the ecospace) can be mapped in a higher dimensional space in which complicated patterns can be more simply represented (Drake et al. 2006).FDA. FDA is an extension of linear discriminant analysis. Linear discriminant analysis assumes that the distribution of each class (presence and absence) follows a Gaussian distribution. This restriction is extended in FDA by allowing a mixture of Gaussian distributions (Mar mion et al. 2009).In general, model accuracy was evaluated by datasplitting using 70% of the data to train the model and the remaining 30% to test the performance. The results were evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Cohen's kappa (κ) as evaluation measures. Both measures were calculated by using the ROC-AUC v 1.3 software (Schröder 2006). The AUC is a thresholdindependent measure representing the relationship between sensitivity and the corresponding proportion of false positives (1-specificity). The AUC varies between 0 and 1, with values above 0.9 indicating excellent prediction, between 0.7 and 0.9 indicating good prediction, below 0.7 indicating poor predictions, and below 0.5 indicating a prediction no better than random (Hosmer & Lemeshow 2000). For the AUC calculation we used 10 000 randomly chosen pseudo-absence points. We tested AUC values for significant differences to a critical AUC of 0.7 following the method of Beck & Shultz (1986). The AUC is considered a highly effective measure for the performance of SDMs, because it does not require a specific threshold and is independent from prevalence (the proportion of sites in which the species was predicted as present) (McPherson et al. 2004).Cohen's kappa is another commonly used evaluation measure in ecological SDM studies with presence− absence data and is often applied when a specific threshold level is required. Kappa is based on a confusion matrix with a threshold at which κ is maximised (Fielding & Bell 1997). It ranges from −1 to 1, with κ values below 0 indicating a prediction no better than random (Cohen 1960). Values above 0.75 indicate excellent prediction, between 0.4 and 0.75 indicate good prediction and below 0.4 indicate poor predictions (Landis & Koch 1977). In contrast to the AUC, κ is dependent on prevalence (McPherson et al. 2004). For the calculation of κ, we randomly generated pseudo-absence data in a 1:1 ratio with the number of presence records.We identified collinearity among the environmental parameters, using Pearson's correlation with r > 0.7 as a threshold level for collinearity (Booth et al. 1994). Only summer and winter salinity were highly correlated (r = 0.905), thus we omitted winter salinity prior to further analyses and modelling.For further evaluation of the model predictions, we performed pairwise comparison of the output of any 2 models. For each model and species, we determined the number of grid cells for which the predicted occurrence was likely as well as unlikely. The probability that maximised κ was used as a threshold for each model and species. We then calculated the percentage of the area with differences in the predictions. Thus, the percentage of area disagreement gives the proportion of the area where the probability of occurrence of one model is above its threshold value whereas the probability of the compared model is below its threshold. We calculated the mean percentage across all species for each pair of models.The relative contribution of the environmental variables was quantified exemptively for the MAXENT model by using a jackknife cross-evaluation procedure. Here the model is calculated with 1 environmental variable and then without that variable but with all remaining variables. This procedure therefore quantifies the explanatory information in each variable when used in isolation and determines the individual effect of each environmental variable (Phillips 2005).The 20 benthic species used for the application and comparison of the different SDMs were chosen inter alia because of their differences in geographical distribution patterns and widespread occurrence. Nonetheless, AUC values, as one measure of model performance, significantly exceeded the threshold of 0.7 indicating good or very good performances for most species and models (Table 1). Only the GARP and BIOCLIM models produced results that were not significantly above an AUC value of 0.7 for more than 5 species (GARP: 9 species; BIOCLIM: 13 species), whereas the other models revealed fewer nonsignificant results (Table 1). Fig. 1 shows mean AUC plotted against mean κ for all models, reflecting a linear gradient in model performance. In general, BIOCLIM performed poorly with the lowest AUC value of 0.708 ± 0.076 (mean ± SD), followed by GARP and GLM with intermediate performance and AUC values of 0.780 ± 0.081 and 0.808 ± 0.088, respectively (Fig. 1, Table 1). All other models clustered together in the upper part of the graph indicating similar good performance, with the best performance for GBM and MAXENT. For the latter models, the mean AUC value was 0.840 ± 0.068 and 0.845 ± 0.068, respectively (Table 1).In general, the lowest AUC values were obtained for species widely distributed across the North Sea area, such as the polychaetes Owenia fusiformis, Spio phanes bombyx, Nephtys hombergii and Myrioche le spp., and the echinoderms Amphiura filiformis and Echino cardium cordatum. In contrast, the highest AUC values were obtained for species with distributions restricted to a specific area of the North Sea, such as the echinoderm Acrocnida brachiata, the amphi pod Urothoe poseidonis and the bivalves Cor bu la gibba and Tellina fabula (Table 1).Despite the overall high AUC and κ values, the maps from the different models showed remarkable differences in predicted distribution patterns. Fig. 2 shows the predictive maps of 4 selected species with contrasting distribution patterns, i.e. Acrocnida brachi ata with a narrow southern distribution in the North Sea, Amphiura filiformis with a wide distribution, Paramphinome jeffreysii with a northern distribution and the rare species Arctica islandica. Although the models produced different predictions for the potential distribution patterns to some extent, most models ascertained core distribution areas. For example, all models indicated the main distribution area of Acrocnida brachiata as the German Bight (southeastern North Sea) and the Dogger Bank (southern central North Sea), and the unsuitability of the northern North Sea (Fig. 2).The largest differences in the percentage of area disagreement was found between BIOCLIM and any of the other models tested, with more than 28% differences in predictions in most cases (Table 2). The lowest percentage of area disagreement was between GBM and MAXENT (8.4%), GBM and SVM (12.1%), and MAXENT and SVM (12.2%) (Table 2). These models predicted similar patterns as confirmed by visual comparison of predictive maps (Fig. 2). As with model performance, the highest disagreement was for species with a wide distribution range compared to geographically restricted species (results not shown).The MAXENT model quantified the relative contribution of the environmental variables quite well (for predictive maps see Fig. 3). For 14 species, depth and bottom water temperature (summer and winter) were the most important determinants of distribution (Fig. 4). Species response to depth peaked mainly between 20 and 50 m for species with a southern distribution, which are consequently more broadly distributed than species in the deeper northern parts of the North Sea (Fig. 5). In contrast, summer bottom water temperature response showed more gradual progression (Fig. 5).Few previous studies have modelled distributions of marine species, although the information is highly relevant for understanding marine benthic systems, for their protection, and for predicting future changes in marine ecosystems (Leathwick et al. 2008, Elith & Leathwick 2009). Thus, the objectives of this study were to apply and compare multiple species distribution modelling methods by generating distribution predictions for 20 characteristic North Sea benthic species.The results of our comparison of the different modelling approaches parallel recent extensive comparisons for terrestrial systems (Elith et al. 2006 performed best, followed by MARS, GLM, generalised additive models (GAM) and GARP. Methods such as BIOCLIM and Domain performed poorly. Our study also found that MAXENT and GBM performed best, based on AUC and κ scores. Most of the other modelling algorithms such as SVM, MARS, FDA and RF, as well as GLM and GARP, were largely indistinguishable from each other, but also performed well.In contrast, BIOCLIM performed poorly based on AUC and κ values (Fig. 1). Most previous species dis- tribution modelling in the marine environment has focused on regression-based models such as GLMs (e.g. Venables & Dichmont 2004, Willems et al. 2008, Chatfield et al. 2010, Gogina et al. 2010), but our results show that machine-learning and other methods were successful in predicting North Sea benthic species distributions (see also Willems et al. 2008). Nevertheless, visual assessment of the mapped predictions revealed remarkable differences between the methods. Models such as GARP overpredicted habitat suitability for different species, whereas RF, FDA and MARS underpredicted habitat suitability (Fig. 2). Elith & Graham (2009) showed that GARP could not identify the true relationship between simulated plant species and environmental data, and output maps overpredicted distributions. In contrast, methods such as MAXENT and BRT (similar to GBM) recreated the distribution patterns more precisely (Elith & Graham 2009). Both methods also generated very similar predictions of potential species distribution across all species in our study (Table 2). How-ever, the choice of modelling method depends on the specific application. Methods which tend to underpredict distribution patterns might be useful for species protection applications (e.g. Marine Protected Areas), whereas overprediction can be more useful for other precautionary management strategies (e.g. to limit the spread of invasive species).The model evaluation in this study was primarily based on the AUC, since it neither requires a specific threshold nor depends on prevalence (e.g. Cohen's kappa;McPherson et al. 2004). Nevertheless, recent studies on the drawbacks of using the AUC (Austin 2007, Lobo et al. 2008) showed that the influences on the AUC scores of the total extent to which models are carried out are highly problematic (Lobo et al. 2008). Despite differences in performance between models, our results agree with previous studies of terrestrial ecosystems that show higher accuracy for species with a narrow ecological niche compared to species with a broad niche (see Tsoar et al. 2007 and references therein). A possible ecological explana- tion for this pattern is that the species inhabiting most parts of the area for which the model was trained might not be limited by any of the environmental variables at this spatial scale (Brotons et al. 2004, McPherson & Jetz 2007). Intraspecific genetic differences may also lead to differences in local adaptations and small-scale population differentiation within the spatial range of the species, which are not accounted for by modelling the potential distribution of the species as an entity (Stockwell & Peterson 2002, Rissler & Apodaca 2007). The pattern may just be an artificial function of the spatial extent of the analyses. Lobo et al. (2008) pointed out that different species have distinct ratios between the extent of occurrence and the extent of the area under study, which is smaller for species with a narrow ecological niche (based on the limited spatial extent). The smaller this ratio, the higher the number of (pseudo-)absence points that are more environmentally distant from the presence points, which leads to higher AUC scores (Elith et al. 2006, Jiménez-Valverde et al. 2008, Lobo et al. 2008). Thus, the comparison of model performances for different species within the same spatial extent must be interpreted with caution when applying and evaluating species distribution models. In contrast, the consistent relationship between number of occurrence records and model performance indicated by previous studies (e.g. Stockwell & Peterson 2002, Kadmon et al. 2003, but see Elith et al. 2006), was not obvious in our study, in that species occurrences ranged from 26 to 568 records.Although our results indicate that most of the SDM methods generate sufficient predictions of potential distribution for most of the selected benthic species, there were some remarkable differences in performance. Autecological characteristics of the species can significantly affect model accuracy. Species range (see above), mobility and migratory behaviour, endemism and even body size can influence predictive models (Pearce et al. 2001, Kadmon et al. 2003, McPherson & Jetz 2007, Marmion et al. 2009). The mobility and dispersal range might be of specific importance in marine ecosystems, where most species have either mobile adult stages (e.g. epibenthos, fish) or highly mobile early life stages (e.g. pelagic larvae). Furthermore, dispersal barriers are less distinct in marine than in terrestrial systems (Carr et al. 2003). Dispersal of pelagic larvae or secondary dispersal of juvenile invertebrates can facilitate recruitment to suboptimal habitats where species can persist for longer time periods as sink populations (Pulliam 2000). The possible effect of sink populations and dispersal ability have to be considered when applying and interpreting species distribution models (McPherson et al. 2004, Tsoar et al. 2007). In order to account for mobility and dispersal abilities of individual species, some approaches incorporate dispersal into distribution modelling approaches (e.g. by coupling SDM to dispersal simulations; Bahn et al. 2008, Václavík & Meentemeyer 2009). However, our understanding of dispersal pathways and species interactions is often limited for marine benthic ecosystems and their inclusion into prognostic SDM approaches remain a challenging but important need (Pearson & Dawson 2003, Elith & Leathwick 2009, Van der Putten et al. 2010).Environmental measurements on relevant spatial scales provide the fundamental basis of species distribution modelling. Especially for marine ecosystems, the availability of large-scale environmental data has significantly improved in the last decade, through increased research in habitat mapping and remote sensing techniques, and regular monitoring of the seafloor environment.To be useful in a distribution modelling context, environmental variables should ideally represent limiting factors, resources or disturbances (natural or anthropogenic) causally linked to the species of interest and its habitat (Guisan & Zimmermann 2000, Guisan & Thuiller 2005, Elith & Leathwick 2009). For our predictors, we chose 10 environmental variables thought to influence benthic habitat and species (e.g. Pearson & Rosenberg 1987, Heip & Craeymeersch 1995, Callaway et al. 2002, Wieking & Kröncke 2005). However, in many cases we used modelled environmental data (e.g. bottom water temperature and salinity, tidal stress, annual primary production), which might have added to uncertainty of the SDM outputs. Nevertheless, variables acting near the sea bottom are particularly influential for benthic ecosystems. Thus, sea surface data, which are often more readily available, may not reflect seafloor conditions sufficiently. The differences in the spatial resolution of the original environmental variables and the interpolation to a standardised grid size needed for the application of the models may also have impacted the predictive output of the SDM (e.g. Guisan & Zimmer mann 2000, Austin & Van Niel 2011). Environmental variables with a distinct small-scale patchiness (e.g. sediment composition) will be more affected by differences in resolution than variables with less intrinsic variability (e.g. temperature). Thus, the sediment composition variables used in this study might only partly represent the fine-scale resolution necessary for a predictor variable over such a large scale. Indeed, the contributions of single environmental variables to the MAXENT results in our study showed that sediment composition was of minor importance for the distribution predictions of most species, with the exception of the echinoderm Brissopsis lyrifera (Fig. 4). Sediment characteristics have often been found to affect benthic infaunal community patterns (e.g. Rees et al. 1999, Callaway et al. 2002, van Hoey et al. 2004, Schratzberger et al. 2006) and were primarily used to develop a SDM for polychaete distribution in the southern North Sea (Meißner et al. 2008). Besides the methodological problems mentioned above, we assume that the relative importance of the influencing factors may vary with the spatial scale and the autecological characteristics of the species. Thus, on a smaller spatial scale, the distribution of benthic species might be more closely linked to sediment characteristics and small-scale bottom topography, whereas on larger scales, hydrologic and climatic variables might be more important (Reiss et al. 2010). This possible scale dependency should also be considered when transferring models developed for one region to another (e.g. Randin et al. 2006, Elith & Leathwick 2009).Bottom temperature and depth influenced distributions of many benthic species in our study. While depth is an indirect proxy for several environmental variables, many studies assume temperature to be an important variable for benthic species and community distributions (e.g. Callaway et al. 2002, Neumann et al. 2009, Reiss et al. 2010). For example, the amphipod Megaluropus agilis and the echinoderm Acrocnida brachiata are sensitive to changes in water temperature in the North Sea (Wieking & Kröncke 2003), which was also evident in the MAX-ENT results. Temperature also influenced the distribution of other characteristic species, such as Corbula gibba, Magelona johnstoni, Tellina fabula or Urothoe poseidonis. It is important to recognise that correla-tive approaches such as SDMs do not reveal cause-effect relationships between environmental variables and benthic fauna. Surrogate variables, such as water depth, might be especially useful in a correlative approach to predict actual distribution, but cause-effect relationships must be better understood to enable reliable predictions of distribution shifts in changing environments.One main objective of applying distribution modelling methods to marine benthic species is to predict changes of distribution patterns in response to climate change. Our results demonstrate the utility of the different models for predicting potential distributions of North Sea benthic species and the importance of climatic variables such as bottom temperature. We do not suggest equal applicability of these models for the prediction of future distributions under different climates (Pearson & Dawson 2003, Hampe 2004, Thuiller 2004, Araújo et al. 2005). The main problem for prognostic species distribution modelling is that processes such as species interactions, habitat change, rapid evolutionary changes, and dispersal range and barriers are not included in most of the modelling approaches. Changes in species interactions (predation, competition, symbiosis) can significantly affect species distributions (e.g. Mouritsen et al. 2005, Traill et al. 2010), which might be further altered by invasions of non-native species facilitated by climate change, resulting in novel combinations of species (Walther et al. 2009). As the modelled species distribution is based on present-day conditions, future changes in species interactions are not considered and this can lead to erroneous model predictions. Although species interactions are expected to be less important on a global or regional scale (e.g. North Sea) than on a local scale, Araújo & Luoto (2007) have demonstrated effects of species interactions on these macro-scales.This study focused on predicting the probability of species occurrences, but quantitative predictions (e.g. abundance or biomass) of marine benthic species are also needed in order to understand largescale ecosystem processes. Estimating abundance simply by using the probability of occurrence as a proxy is not possible (at least for the benthic species analysed in this study), because these 2 parameters are not significantly correlated (H. Reiss unpubl. data). Thus, Bayesian and other modelling approaches will be necessary tools in future prediction of quantitative characteristics of species distribution (Pearce & Boyce 2006, Potts & Elith 2006, Anadón et al. 2010, Chakraborty et al. 2010). These approaches will be especially valuable for the marine benthic en -vironment, where sampling and observation depend on point data records. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2764485464.json b/main/part_2/2764485464.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2790c46e51660469fd0c493155b2fdd55f670729 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2764485464.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"bb67e014d35abb4019f282d349d15aa3","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f5e39a26-58bf-42a7-ba5f-1f2849866612/retrieve","id":"1920147546"},"keywords":["agroforestry","banana-associated Gammaproteobacteria","banana-coffee intercropping","Gros Michel","Musa"],"sieverID":"a2eca7e2-0b8c-4342-bb09-c6242a035896","content":"Bananas (Musa spp.) belong to the most important global food commodities, and their cultivation represents the world's largest monoculture. Although the plant-associated microbiome has substantial influence on plant growth and health, there is a lack of knowledge of the banana microbiome and its influencing factors. We studied the impact of (i) biogeography, and (ii) agroforestry on the banana-associated gammaproteobacterial microbiome analyzing plants grown in smallholder farms in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. Profiles of 16S rRNA genes revealed high abundances of Pseudomonadales, Enterobacteriales, Xanthomonadales, and Legionellales. An extraordinary high diversity of the gammaproteobacterial microbiota was observed within the endophytic microenvironments (endorhiza and pseudostem), which was similar in both countries. Enterobacteria were identified as dominant group of above-ground plant parts (pseudostem and leaves). Neither biogeography nor agroforestry showed a statistically significant impact on the gammaproteobacterial banana microbiome in general. However, indicator species for each microenvironment and country, as well as for plants grown in Coffea intercropping systems with and without agri-silvicultural production of different Fabaceae trees (Inga spp. in Nicaragua and Erythrina poeppigiana in Costa Rica) could be identified. For example, banana plants grown in agroforestry systems were characterized by an increase of potential plant-beneficial bacteria, like Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas, and on the other side by a decrease of Erwinia. Hence, this study could show that as a result of legume-based agroforestry the indigenous banana-associated gammaproteobacterial community noticeably shifted.Musa spp., including dessert and cooking bananas, are large perennial monocotyledonous herbs of the order Zingiberales. Their domestication process started about 7000 years ago and involved hybridizations between diverse species and subspecies and the selection of sometimes diploid, but generally triploid seedless, parthenocarpic hybrids, which were thereafter widely dispersed by vegetative propagation (Perrier et al., 2011). The cultigens are landraces and belong to the most important agricultural crops in the tropics and sub-tropics. Worldwide, over 100 million metric tons of fruits are produced annually. Cultivars that enter international commerce are worth $5 billion per year, and locally consumed fruits are major staples for 400 million people in Latin America and Africa (FAOSTAT, 2005).The Musa acuminata cultivar Gros Michel, also known as Big Mike, was the main exported banana variety from the nineteenth century until the late 1950s. However, in response to the susceptibility of this cultivar to the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc) race 1, Gros Michel was widely replaced by the resistant Cavendish variety (Ploetz, 2006;Butler, 2013). In many countries in Central America, such as Costa Rica and Nicaragua, the Gros Michel variety is still grown, mainly by smallholder farmers in banana-coffee intercropping systems, sometimes in combination with agroforestry systems, where a lower disease incidence is reported in comparison to monocultures. Gros Michel fruits are praised for their fabulous flavor and, due to their thicker skin, for a better robustness to bruises in comparison to Cavendish. Agroforestry in general is a collective name for land-use systems in which woody perennials are grown in association with herbaceous plants or livestock, in spatial arrangement, a rotation or both (Lundgren, 1982). These practices are considered as functionally biodiverse, environmentally friendly and sustainable land-use alternatives. It was shown that such systems were able to enhance soil fertility and productivity by improving certain soil physical properties and protective functions, such as nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration (Montagnini and Nair, 2004;Seobi et al., 2005;Udawatta et al., 2009). Undeniably, it can be assumed that these environmental benefits are associated with soil microbial activity and soil biological parameters. In addition, the plant-associated microbiome has substantial influence on plant growth, quality, and health (Berg et al., 2014). However, despite the importance of banana for grower's livelihoods on these agroforestry systems in Central America and the hypothesized role of soil and plant microbiome on building healthier environments, knowledge on the microbial diversity of representative productions areas is still scarce.The objective of this study was to decipher the gammaproteobacterial microbiome of banana plants cultivated in Central America. In order to obtain an almost complete picture of the banana-colonizing Gammaproteobacteria under diverse conditions, different plant parts and microenvironments were investigated: the rhizosphere soil surrounding the roots and represents the interface to the bulk soil, the inner tissue of the roots -the endorhiza, the banana leaves, as well as the pseudostem. The cylindrical succulent pseudostem is a peculiarity of the herbaceous banana plant which consists of closely packed leaf-petiole sheaths (Saravanan and Aradhya, 2011). It provides a unique microhabitat for endophytic microorganisms and was recently identified as a bacterial hot spot colonized by an extraordinary high abundance and diversity of enterics (Rossmann et al., 2012). Consequently, we hypothesized a key role of the Enterobacteriaceae for plant health especially in the endophytic microenvironments. To additionally capture the group of often plant-beneficial fluorescent pseudomonads (Ayyadurai et al., 2006;Weller, 2007), and at the same time to preserve the necessary sequencing depth, we decided to focus on the whole gammaproteobacterial fraction by employing a comprehensive 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing approach. Comparisons between colonization patterns reveal the impact of (i) biogeography (Nicaragua vs. Costa Rica), and (ii) agroforestry conditions (banana-coffee intercropping with vs. without agroforestry) on the banana-associated gammaproteobacterial microbiota.Samples were taken in November 2012 from M. acuminata Colla (AAA group) cultivar Gros Michel in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. In each country, samples of banana roots, pseudostem, leaves, and rhizosphere soil were collected from three different farms (Figure S1), where bananas were cultivated in intercropping systems with Coffea spp. To understand the effect of agroforestry on the banana-associated microbiome, samples were collected on each farm from sites with and without associated Fabaceae trees. The predominant trees were Inga spp. in Nicaragua and Erythrina poeppigiana in Costa Rica. Each site was under the respective production system since more than 50 years. Composite samples consisting of sub-samples from five appropriate plants without visible infestation of any disease were taken for each microenvironment.For extraction of metagenomic DNA from the rhizosphere, 2 g of rhizospheric soil were mixed with 15 ml of 0.85% NaCl for 10 s on the vortex. To isolate total community DNA from the endorhiza, 5 g of roots were surface-sterilized with 4% NaOCl for 5 min. Afterwards, roots were washed three times with sterile distilled water and transferred to sterile WhirlPaks (Nasco, Fort Atkinson, USA), then 10 ml of 0.85% NaCl were added and the surface-sterilized roots were homogenized using mortar and pestle. Pseudostem samples (5 g) were washed with sterile distilled water, transferred to WhirlPaks, and after 10 ml of 0.85% NaCl were added, homogenized with mortar and pestle. From phyllosphere samples, 5 g of leaves were washed three times with sterile distilled water, before homogenization with 10 ml of 0.85% NaCl. From the liquid parts 4 ml were centrifuged at high speed (16,000 × g, 4 • C) for 20 min and resulting pellets were stored at −70 • C. Total community DNA was extracted using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Solon, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Metagenomic DNA samples were encoded using abbreviations indicating: (1) country (N−, Nicaragua; C−, Costa Rica), (2) microenvironment (S, rhizosphere soil; Re, endorhiza; Ps, pseudostem; L, leaves), ( 3) farm (1-3 in each country; Figure S1) (4) agroforestry conditions (T+, with trees; T−, without trees).For a deep-sequencing analysis of the banana-associated Gammaproteobacteria community, the hypervariable V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified in a nested PCR approach with the Gammaproteobacteria specific primer pair Gamma395f/Gamma871r (Mühling et al., 2008) and the universal primer pair 515F/806R (Caporaso et al., 2011), which carried sample specific tags. The reaction mixture for the first PCR (20 µl) contained 1 × Taq&Go (MP Biomedicals, Eschwege, Germany), 2 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1 µM of each primer and 1 µl of template DNA dilution (96 • C, 4 min; 30 cycles of 96 • C, 1 min; 54 • C, 1 min; 74 • C, 1 min; and elongation at 74 • C, 10 min). The second PCR (30 µl) was performed by using 1 × Taq&Go, 0.2 µM of each primer and 1.2 µl from dilutions of the first PCR mixtures (94 • C, 3 min; 32 cycles of 94 • C, 45 s; 60 • C, 1 min; 72 • C, 18 s; and elongation at 72 • C, 10 min). PCR products of three independent reactions were pooled in equal volumes and purified by employing the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Madison, USA). Sequence libraries were generated by a paired-end approach using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Eurofins MWG, Ebersberg, Germany). The nucleotide sequences are available in the European Nucleotide Archive (www.ebi.ac.uk/ ena) under the accession number PRJEB8107.Data analysis was performed by employing the open source software package QIIME 1.8 (Caporaso et al., 2010a). Sequencing reads with more than three consecutive low quality base calls (Phred quality score ≤ 20) were truncated at the position where their quality began to drop, and only reads with >75% consecutive high quality base calls, without any ambiguous characters, and longer than 200 nucleotides in length were retained for further analyses. All quality sequences were adjusted in the same orientation and clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with uclust (Edgar, 2010), using 3, 5, and 10% dissimilarity thresholds. From each OTU the most abundant sequence was selected as the representative one, and the taxonomy of the representative set was assigned with the uclust-based consensus taxonomy assigner using an 80% confidence threshold. The representative sequence set was aligned with PyNAST (Caporaso et al., 2010b). Chimera check was performed with ChimeraSlayer and potentially chimeric sequences were discarded. OTU tables at the different dissimilarity levels were constructed, and OTUs not assigned to the class of Gammaproteobacteria as well as singletons were removed from the dataset. For alpha and beta diversity analyses, OTU tables were rarefied at 13,610 reads. Diversity indices Shannon (Shannon, 1997) and Chao1 (Chao and Bunge, 2002) were determined based on the normalized clustering data. Significant differences were calculated with PASW Statistics 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) using Tukey and Games-Howell post hoc tests, depending on the homogeneity of variances. Beta diversity was analyzed based on weighted UniFrac distances (Lozupone et al., 2007) and 10 jackknife replicates of the total rarefied datasets. Statistical analyses were performed using the adonis test with 999 permutations. Taxonomy based ring-charts were created with Krona 2.2 (Ondov et al., 2011).Profile clustering network analyses were performed in order to highlight single taxonomic groups corresponding to genus level (OTUs at a dissimilarity level of 3% summarized at taxonomic level 6) with considerable differences between banana plants grown in Nicaragua and in Costa Rica and between those grown with and without associated trees. The network analyses were carried out with taxa exhibiting a mean read change of more than 0.2% of the data set. If the ratio of relative mean abundances exceeded 1.5, the taxa were regarded as altered and assigned to the respective profile. Networks depicting community changes resulting from biogeographical location were restricted to taxa which significantly differed between countries. Significant differences were ascertained with Metastats (White et al., 2009), where p-values were computed using a combination of the nonparametric t-test, exact Fisher's test, and the false discovery rate with 10 3 permutations. For networks showing differences caused by agroforestry, only taxonomic groups featuring the same pattern in all three farms of a country were considered. Visualization of the networks was carried out using Cytoscape 2.8.3 (Smoot et al., 2011).The gammaproteobacterial microbiota associated to the rhizosphere, endorhiza, pseudostem, and foliage of healthy banana plants grown under different agroforestry conditions in Nicaragua and Costa Rica analyzed by a barcoded 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing approach based on Illumina MiSeq sequencing yielded in 2,234,043 quality sequences with a read length ≥200 nucleotides, between 13,619 and 111,332 quality reads per sample. Rarefaction analyses of the sequencing libraries at a genetic dissimilarity level of 3% are depicted in Figure S2.Comparisons of observed OTUs with their estimated richness by the Chao1 index revealed coverage between 87.3 and 47.4% per sample at order level (Table S1). The sequencing efforts at genus and species level reached 74.1-39.9% and 68.8-31.5%, respectively. The computed Shannon indices of diversity (H ) ranged from 7.56 to 1.47 at a genetic distance of 3% (Table S1). In general, rhizosphere and endorhiza samples exhibited higher gammaproteobacterial diversity than pseudostem and leaves (Figure 1). Within samples from Nicaragua, the highest values were observed for the rhizospheric soil (5.46 on average ± 0.90 confidence), but without a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05, Tukey post hoc test) to the endorhiza (4.46 ± 1.02). Significantly lower Shannon indices than in the rhizosphere soil were detected for pseudostem (2.61 ± 0.45) and leaves samples (2.59 ± 0.49). Banana plants from Costa Rica revealed the highest diversity in the endorhiza (6.08 ± 0.85), which not significantly differed from the rhizosphere soil (4.45 ± 1.18). Significantly lower values than in the endorhiza were observed for leaves (3.38 ± 0.73) and pseudostem (3.11 ± 0.46). Between the same microenvironments of banana plants from the two countries, no significant differences were observed. Agroforestry did not show a significant impact (p ≤ 0.05, Games-Howell post hoc test) on the gammaproteobacterial diversity of the different microenvironments.Nearly all quality sequences could be assigned below the class level, and over all banana-associated communities, high abundances of Pseudomonadales, Enterobacteriales, Xanthomonadales, and Legionellales were found (Figures 2, 3). The rhizosphere of bananas from Nicaragua was colonized by a significantly higher abundance (p ≤ 0.05, Metastats) of Pseudomonadales, Thiotrichales, as well as of unclassified Gammaproteobacteria than the rhizosphere soil of Costa Rica. Conversely, the plant rhizosphere from Costa Rica was inhabited to a greater extent of Legionellales and Enterobacteriales. The endorhiza of bananas from Nicaragua exhibited significantly higher relative abundances of Pseudomonadales, while Xanthomonadales occurred in higher abundances in endorhiza samples from Costa Rica. The pseudostem in general was highly dominated by Enterobacteriales and Pseudomonadales and showed no significant differences between countries at order level. The foliage exhibited a similar gammaproteobacterial colonization to the pseudostem. However, the leaves from Costa Rica revealed in addition to the dominant orders higher abundances of Oceanospirillales than those from Nicaragua.At lower taxonomic levels, Pseudomonadales could be assigned to Pseudomonadaceae (genus Pseudomonas) and Moraxellaceae (genera Acinetobacter, Perlucidibaca, and Enhydrobacter), whereby in general Nicaragua samples were highly dominated by Pseudomonadaceae and samples from Costa Rica revealed a high abundance of Moraxellaceae. The enterobacterial fraction was dominated by Erwinia with lower abundances of Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Serratia. Xanthomonadales sequences could be assigned to different Xanthomonadaceae (Stenotrophomonas, Pseudoxanthomonas, Luteimonas, Dokdonella, Rhodanobacter, and Luteibacter) and Sinobacteraceae (Steroidobacter, and Nevskia). Legionellales could be divided into the families Coxiellaceae (Aquicella) and Legionellaceae (Legionella, and Tatlockia). Further genera identified for taxonomic groups with a relative abundance over 1% per sample belonged to Alteromonadales (Cellvibrio, and Rheinheimera) and to Oceanospirillales (Halomonas).Considering the total gammaproteobacterial community, no significant differences (p ≤ 0.05, adonis test) based on weighted UniFrac distances could be calculated for individual microenvironments between banana plants grown in Nicaragua and Costa Rica (Table S2), and for none of the countries a significant impact on the banana-colonizing Gammaproteobacteria resulting from tree presence was found (Table S3). However, profile clustering network analyses revealed differences of individual taxonomic groups in the colonization patterns between banana plants of the two Central American countries as well as between plants grown in agroforestry systems and those grown without associated trees (Figure 4). Each network subdivides the four investigated microenvironments (rhizosphere soil, endorhiza, pseudostem, and leaves), leaving out taxonomic groups without considerable differences between different conditions. In the networks visualizing the impact of biogeography, only taxa with significant differences (p ≤ 0.05, Metastats) between the sampling countries were shown, while in the networks depicting the impact of agroforestry, only taxa featuring the same pattern in all three farms of the respective country were considered.Without the influence of different agroforestry trees, banana plants from Nicaragua revealed a significantly higher abundance of Pseudomonas, unclassified Sinobacteraceae, Piscirickettsiaceae, and other unclassified Gammaproteobacteria in their rhizosphere (Figure 4A), while the rhizosphere and also the endorhiza from plants in Costa Rica was colonized to a greater extent by Legionellales (unclassified Coxiellaceae and others). The pseudostem did not show significant differences in its gammaproteobacterial colonization between the two countries in plants grown without associated trees. However, the leaves from plants grown in Nicaragua exhibited higher numbers of unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, while those of plants from Costa Rica had higher abundances of Acinetobacter and unclassified Xanthomonadaceae. Under agroforestry conditions, the below-ground habitats of banana plants grown in Nicaragua in association with Inga spp. were characterized by much higher abundances of Pseudomonas than bananas cultivated under agroforestry conditions with E. poeppigiana in Costa Rica (Figure 4B). The rhizosphere of plants grown in the Inga agroforestry system further revealed higher abundances of unclassified Alteromonadales and other unclassified Gammaproteobacteria, while banana plants grown in the Erythrina agroforestry system were more inhabited by unclassified Sinobacteraceae in their endorhiza and by Erwinia in their rhizosphere. Conversely, banana leaves from the Inga agroforestry system in Nicaragua showed a significantly higher number of Erwinia, while the aerial plant parts of Costa Rica's bananas from the Erythrina agroforestry system were colonized to a greater extent by Acinetobacter. In comparison to banana plants grown without associated trees, plants cultivated in agro-ecosystems in Nicaragua harbored an increased number of Pseudomonas (species unclassified) in their endorhiza (Figure 4C), as well as of Xanthomonadaceae (Stenotrophomonas and others) in their above-ground parts. Costa Rica's plants grown in a system without trees revealed a significantly higher number of Erwinia in their phyllosphere than appropriate plants grown in an agroforestry system (Figure 4D).A deep sequencing analysis of the gammaproteobacterial microbiome associated with the Gros Michel banana variety in Central America revealed an extraordinary high diversity within the endophytic community. Considering the below-ground microhabitats, the endorhiza of plants grown in Nicaragua unveiled a diversity comparable to that of the rhizosphere soil. The succulent pseudostem which can be considered as an above-ground endophytic microhabitat revealed a diversity comparable to that of the leaves encompassing endo-as well as ectophytes. A 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing approach targeting only the enterobacterial community of the banana plant revealed a strikingly diverse colonization of its endosphere with a Shannon diversity index for the pseudostem (H = 0.55) similar to those of rhizosphere samples (H = 0.40-0.55), even though based on only one pseudostem sample (Rossmann et al., 2012). But normally, what we know from other plants, we face a contrasting picture; due to root exudates and the resulting high nutrient content, the rhizosphere represents a favored microenvironment for microbial colonization and is characterized by a high abundance and diversity (Berendsen et al., 2012;Berg et al., 2014), and only a fraction of this root-associated microorganisms is able to invade, compete with other well-adapted endophytes, and successfully colonize the inner plant tissue (Germaine et al., 2004;Chi et al., 2005). Several endophytes are known for their advantageous associations and close interactions with their host plants. They have been shown to enhance plant growth and quality (Berg et al., 2005a;Köberl et al., 2013), increase plant resistance to abiotic stresses, pathogens and even herbivores (Rodriguez et al., 2009;Marasco et al., 2012;Yi et al., 2013), and contribute to plant-assisted bioremediation (Lodewyckx et al., 2001;Siciliano et al., 2001). The generally high diversity within the endophytic community of the banana plant can be explained by the permanent nature of its corm serving as a reservoir for endophytic diversity and the transmission to following generations via vegetative suckers.In addition to the diversity, the gammaproteobacterial taxonomic composition was highly similar between the endophytic pseudostem and banana leaves as well, revealing a predominant colonization by Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadales. Pseudomonadales, in particular the genus Pseudomonas but also Acinetobacter (both identified as dominant groups in this study), are well-known plant colonizers and among others often accountable for beneficial plant-microbe interactions (Weller, 2007;Rolli et al., 2015). Interestingly, while the Pseudomonadales community in samples from Nicaragua was highly dominated by the genus Pseudomonas, banana plants from Costa Rica revealed significantly higher relative abundances of Acinetobacter. Although it is well-known that the plant microbiome is shaped by both soil community and the plant cultivar (Berg and Smalla, 2009), the dominance of enterics in the banana pseudostem described for the East African Highland banana of Uganda (Rossmann et al., 2012) could be confirmed for the Gros Michel variety cultivated in Central America as well and could be extended to the entire perennial above-ground plant parts of the banana. However, while the colonization study of the East African Highland banana in Uganda (Rossmann et al., 2012) revealed Enterobacter as the predominant enterobacterial genus in plant-associated microenvironments, Erwinia was identified as the most dominant genus in the Central American Gros Michel variety. In contrast to Enterobacter which comprises several opportunistic human pathogenic strains (E. aerogenes, E. cloacae) (Berg et al., 2015), Erwinia is mainly known as plant pathogen (E. amylovora, E. tracheiphila) (Eastgate, 2000;Rojas et al., 2013). However, as this study encompassed only healthy banana plants without symptoms of Fusarium wilt or any other disease, there is no indication that the Erwinia strains observed within the banana-associated microbiome are in any manner harmful to the plant. A recent study of the lettuce (Lactuca sativa) microbiome also revealed a preferential occurrence of enterics in the phyllosphere (Erlacher et al., 2014).In general, a higher impact on the banana-associated gammaproteobacterial microbiome was observed for the biogeographical location than for the agroforestry conditions. The biggest differences between the sampling countries were observed for the rhizosphere communities, representing the most probable source of all other plant colonizers. Consequently, based on the different rhizosphere microbiomes, disparities were found for all investigated microenvironments, whereby above-ground plant parts shared higher similarities, possibly due to a rigorous selection process with subsequent enrichment especially of enterics and pseudomonads. In addition to generally high contents of polyphenols and antioxidants in the succulent banana pseudostem, Saravanan and Aradhya (2011) could recently measure high concentrations of flavonoid compounds. Flavonoids are widely distributed secondary metabolites with diverse metabolic functions in plants; among several others, some of them are wellknown for their antimicrobial activity (Falcone Ferreyra et al., 2012) and have been identified to be involved in the plant-driven selection of microbes (Bais et al., 2006;Weston and Mathesius, 2013).For both countries and different agroforestry systems, a slight shift of the gammaproteobacterial microbiome resulting from associated Fabaceae trees could be observed. Banana plants grown in the agroforestry system with Inga trees in Nicaragua revealed significantly higher abundances of Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas. Both genera comprise several potential plantbeneficial species. For instance, Stenotrophomonas rhizophila has become a model bacterium among the plant growth-promoters and stress protecting agents (Alavi et al., 2013), particularly because of its beneficial effects on plants in salinated soils (Egamberdieva et al., 2011). Positive Pseudomonas-plant interactions are well-known (Weller, 2007) and have already been discussed. However, the genus Pseudomonas also includes some species with potential deleterious effects on plants (P. syringae, P. viridiflava) (Jakob et al., 2002), and moreover some species of Pseudomonas and also of Stenotrophomonas are known as opportunistic pathogens in humans as well (P. aeruginosa, S. maltophilia). Several studies provided evidence that similar or even identical functions are responsible for the beneficial interactions with plants and virulence in other eukaryotic hosts (Berg et al., 2005b;Alavi et al., 2014). For banana plants grown in association with E. poeppigiana in Costa Rica, a significant decrease of Erwinia spp. was recorded. Although this study targeted exclusively the gammaproteobacterial fraction, results could show that as a consequence of legume-based agroforestry the indigenous banana-associated microbial community was noticeably shifted."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2787127945.json b/main/part_2/2787127945.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11f5d5783a54a38ee1cd376d8a4d58dd287950cd --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2787127945.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e4358d46a1c6cf34725d71120f37426c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/0a734c1f-0c05-4925-91eb-afdc19202c61/retrieve","id":"-599837923"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4083e79d-e8c5-4455-bba4-45f9cf56c8cc","content":"Introducción 84 Factores climáticos que más afectan el arroz 84 Temperatura 84 Radiación solar 91 Agua 94 Viento 96 Humedad relativa 96 Referencias bibliográficas 97El arroz es un alimento básico en la dieta de más de la mitad de la población mundial. El arroz se cultiva en condiciones ambientales tan diversas que ha suscitado, a su vez, una diversidad de criterios entre los investigadores y especialistas de este cereal. Algunos autores sostienen que es un cultivo especial de las zonas húmedas del trópico o de los climas de temperatura alta; otros informan que florece en diversas condiciones ambientales entre los 45° de latitud norte y los 40° de latitud sur respecto al ecuador. Se ha informado también que el arroz puede cultivarse desde el nivel del mar hasta los 2500 metros de altitud, una extensión que le permite crecer en áreas donde la temperatura, la longitud del día y la disponibilidad del agua son muy diversas.El análisis de los factores que regulan el crecimiento de la planta de arroz ha revelado a los investigadores las limitantes relacionadas con el desarrollo del arroz y con su adaptabilidad al medio que lo rodea.En las zonas tropical y subtropical de baja altitud, las temperaturas media y extrema son, prácticamente, las adecuadas para este cultivo; ahora bien, la temperatura disminuye con la altitud y esta condición puede convertirse en los trópicos en una limitante para el cultivo del arroz, en dos situaciones: cuando se suaviza la temperatura al principio y al final de la temporada de cultivo, y cuando existe la posibilidad de un descenso de temperatura durante el período vegetativo de la planta.Los valores medios mensuales de la temperatura y de la duración del día durante el período de crecimiento del arroz permiten hacer una valoración aproximada de la evapotranspiración de las plantas de arroz durante este mismo período; por consiguiente, permiten conocer la necesidad absoluta de agua del cultivo para compensar por esa evapotranspiración.En esta sección se analizarán separadamente los distintos factores ambientales que influyen en la producción de grano del cultivo de arroz.La temperatura afecta el crecimiento y el desarrollo de la planta de arroz. Durante las distintas fases del desarrollo, la planta no responde a iguales rangos de temperatura; podría decirse que hay un rango favorable para cada fase. Los fitomejoradores desarrollan variedades que pueden adaptarse bien a diferentes rangos de temperatura para que puedan expresar libremente su potencial genético, no sólo en rendimiento sino también respecto a su respuesta a las plagas y enfermedades que limitan el cultivo.El efecto de las temperaturas bajas (incluyendo la de congelación del agua) en la planta de arroz se ha estudiado bien; por ejemplo, los cambios bioquímicos ocurridos en ella entre 0 y 4 °C están bien determinados. Los resultados de este estudio permiten planear adecuadamente una explotación arrocera; sin embargo, la bioquímica de la planta en el rango de 10 a 21 °C no ha sido bien estudiada.Las plántulas de arroz expuestas a temperaturas bajas pueden sufrir un estancamiento en su crecimiento porque se retardan o cesan sus reacciones químicas y sus procesos físicos; no obstante, el fenómeno puede revertirse y la planta se recupera cuando la temperatura del medio es favorable. Las hojas que se formen durante el tiempo de exposición a la temperatura baja experimentan una elongación.Las plantas más desarrolladas expuestas a temperaturas bajas pueden sufrir un daño irreversible o un colapso de sus funciones -y, en ocasiones, la muerte. Son ejemplos, respectivamente, las plantas que sufren un vaneamiento total de los granos, y las que mueren a consecuencia del intenso amarillamiento de las hojas-debido, posiblemente, a la impotencia de las raíces para absorber los nutrientes del suelo helado.Las temperaturas bajas (de 15 a 19 °C) que afectan las plantas durante el estado de meiosis de las células madre del polen, o sea, de 10 a 11 días antes de la floración, causan una alta esterilidad en las plantas (Satake, 1969). Nakayama (1974) considera el efecto de la temperatura alta como un factor adverso a la producción de arroz, inclusive en algunas regiones frías de Japón. La combinación de temperaturas altas y baja radiación solar durante la maduración del grano acorta esa etapa y es una causa importante de los rendimientos bajos.En condiciones controladas, Moriya y Nara (1971) observaron un alto porcentaje de esterilidad y de granos parcialmente llenos cuando las plantas de arroz fueron expuestas durante la floración a una temperatura promedio de 31.5 °C (máxima de 36 °C y mínima de 27 °C). Resultados similares obtuvieron Sato et al. (1973) y Kusanagi y Washio (1973) en experimentos en que la temperatura máxima oscilaba entre 35 y 30 °C y la mínima entre 35 y 25 °C.Las temperaturas extremas causan serias perturbaciones en el desarrollo de la planta de arroz y, por ello, no favorecen el ambiente en que puede completarse el ciclo de vida de la planta. Las temperaturas críticas para la planta de arroz están, generalmente, por debajo de 20 °C y por encima de 30 °C, y varían según el estado de desarrollo de la planta. Varían también según la variedad de arroz, la duración del efecto de esa temperatura, el cambio de condiciones diurnas a nocturnas, y el estado fisiológico de la planta. El Cuadro 1 muestra la variación de la temperatura crítica frente a las distintas fases de desarrollo de la planta.Cuando se somete la planta a una temperatura inferior a 20 °C durante el estado de reducción en la división de las células madre del polen, se induce en los granos un alto porcentaje de esterilidad (Satake, 1969). Sin embargo, temperaturas de 12 °C (y un poco menores) no causarán esa esterilidad si el tiempo de exposición a ellas no sobrepasa los 2 días, pero causarán hasta un 100% de esterilidad si la exposición se prolonga durante 6 días.La esterilidad debida a las temperaturas bajas se atribuye, generalmente, al efecto de la temperatura nocturna, porque la temperatura diurna alta puede contrarrestar el efecto de la temperatura baja de la noche. Este fenómeno se demostró cuando se expusieron plantas de arroz en estado de reducción celular a una temperatura constante de 14 °C, de día y de noche, durante 9 días: la esterilidad registrada en los granos fue de 41%; en cambio, cuando las plantas pasaron de la temperatura nocturna de 14 °C a una diurna de 26 °C, el porcentaje de esterilidad se redujo a 12%. Matsushima (1976) indicaron que, en el período de desarrollo anterior a la floración, la temperatura óptima diurna era de 31 a 32 °C, mientras que la óptima nocturna variaba entre 21 y 22 °C. En cambio, para un período de desarrollo 15 días después de la floración, dicha temperatura era de 29 °C en el día y 19 °C en la noche. Finalmente, para el período de desarrollo 30 días después de la floración, esas temperaturas eran de 26 °C en el día y 16 °C en la noche.El mismo autor concluyó que el rango de temperaturas durante la etapa de maduración del grano no era, necesariamente, el rango de temperaturas óptimas del día y de la noche, y que la maduración del grano estaba fuertemente influenciada por la temperatura nocturna. Esta conclusión se sustenta en dos hechos: por un lado, la pérdida de carbohidratos debida a la respiración de la planta aumenta cuando la temperatura nocturna es alta y, por otro lado, la temperatura nocturna baja afecta otras actividades fisiológicas. En otras palabras, las temperaturas nocturnas muy altas o muy bajas no favorecen la maduración del grano y hay, ciertamente, una temperatura óptima para esta maduración.Las temperaturas críticas altas pueden afectar el rendimiento de la planta porque tienen influencia en el macollamiento, en la formación de las espiguillas y en la maduración de éstas, efectos que varían también según la variedad.Experimentos realizados por Yoshida (1973) demuestran que la tasa de crecimiento de la planta de arroz aumenta linealmente con la temperatura, en el rango de 22 a 31 ºC (Figura 1). Durante el período inicial de crecimiento, la temperatura afecta muy levemente el macollamiento y la tasa de crecimiento relativo, excepto la temperatura más baja estudiada en los experimentos (22 ºC).El mismo autor encontró que el efecto de la temperatura en el macollamiento está regulado por el nivel de radiación solar. Sus resultados indican básicamente que, a temperatura alta, Cuadro 1. Correspondencia entre las principales etapas de desarrollo de la planta de arroz y las diversas temperaturas (crítica y óptima) que pueden afectar esas etapas.Etapas Tomado de Yoshida (1977).Tasa de crecimiento (0-1 semana) aumenta la tasa de emergencia de hojas y aparecen más yemas (de macollas) que las producidas a menor temperatura; cuando la iluminación es baja, algunas de las yemas no se desarrollan hasta convertirse en macollas, porque faltan los carbohidratos necesarios para su crecimiento.El mismo experimento mostró que, durante la fase reproductiva de la planta, el número de espiguillas por 22 25 28 31planta aumentó cuando disminuyó la temperatura; esto indica que, a diferencia del resultado anterior, la temperatura óptima cambia de alta a baja a medida que avanza el crecimiento de la planta, es decir, de la fase vegetativa a la reproductiva.La temperatura media óptima para la maduración de las variedades japónicas está en un rango de 20 a 22 °C, según varios informes (Matsushima y Tsunoda, 1957;Matsushima et al., 1957;Airni et al., 1959). Los resultados de los experimentos de Murata en 1976 mostraron que el peso de 1000 granos de una misma variedad varía de 24 a 21 g cuando la planta se expone, durante 21 días a partir de la floración, a un cambio de temperatura de 22 a 28 °C (Figura 2).En el trópico, una temperatura diurna de 29 °C, en promedio, no resulta muy perjudicial (respecto a la producción de macollas y granos) cuando hay suficiente radiación solar. Por eso, las variedades de tipo índica se adaptan mejor a las temperaturas altas, mientras que las de tipo japónica necesitan temperaturas bajas para lograr una adecuada madurez del grano. Yoshida y Hara (1977) encontraron, en experimentos hechos bajo condiciones controladas, que la temperatura diaria promedio que requiere el llenado del grano del arroz de tipo índica (Fujisaka 5) está entre 20 y 27 °C, mientras que la requerida por el arroz de tipo japónica (IR20) está entre 16 y 25 °C (Figura 3).La temperatura afecta directamente el desarrollo de la planta de arroz que se cultive en condiciones de inundación y bajo láminas de agua de diferente espesor. La intensidad de ese efecto depende de la posición de los puntos de crecimiento de la planta respecto a la superficie del agua (Tsunoda y Matsushima, 1962). Desde los primeros estados de crecimiento hasta la iniciación de la panícula, las yemas responsables de las hojas, las macollas y la panícula permanecen bajo el agua; su Figura 2. Efecto de la temperatura en el peso de 1000 granos de arroz en la etapa de maduración de la planta (21 días después de la floración). (Tomada de Murata, 1976.) desarrollo, por tanto, recibe el influjo de la temperatura del agua. Ahora bien, el crecimiento y la elongación de toda la planta reciben la influencia de dos temperaturas, la del agua y la del aire, dado que el ciclo de vida se desarrolla, principalmente, en un medio aéreo.A medida que la panícula se desarrolla y sobresale del nivel del agua, la influencia de la temperatura del agua en el crecimiento y en la madurez de la panícula disminuye, y estos fenómenos empiezan a depender cada vez más de la temperatura del aire (Tsunoda y Matsushima, 1962;Matsushima et al., 1964). Se puede concluir, por tanto, que el efecto de las temperaturas del aire y del agua varía según el estado de crecimiento de la planta. De este modo, como indican Matsushima et al. (1964), durante los estados iniciales del desarrollo de la planta la temperatura del agua afecta el rendimiento porque influye en el número de panículas por planta, en el número de granos por panícula, y en el porcentaje de granos maduros que se pueden obtener. En estados más avanzados del desarrollo, la temperatura del aire puede afectar el rendimiento, porque influye directamente en el porcentaje de granos llenos y en su peso.El efecto de la temperatura del agua depende de la magnitud de ésta y de la profundidad de la lámina aplicada. En la mayoría de los casos, la temperatura del agua es mayor que la del aire; a medida que aumenta la profundidad de la lámina de agua, el crecimiento de la panícula depende más de la temperatura del aire. Cuando la planta se encuentra en el estado de reducción celular (en la división de las células del polen), y si la temperatura del aire desciende por debajo de su nivel critico, se puede proteger la planta contra la esterilidad causada por esa temperatura baja aumentando la profundidad del agua hasta 15 ó 20 cm (Nishiyama et al., 1969).Según su estado de desarrollo, la planta puede sufrir daños cuando la temperatura desciende cada día, en promedio, por debajo de 20 ºC. Este daño por frío puede ocurrir no sólo en las zonas templadas, sino en el trópico y en el subtrópico durante las noches de la época seca o de verano. Los daños causados por el frío a los cultivos de arroz se han reportado en Australia, Bangladesh, China, Colombia, Corea, Cuba, Estados Unidos de América, India, Indonesia, Irán, Japón, Nepal, Pakistán, Perú, Sri Lanka, en la antigua Unión Soviética y en otros países. Los principales daños observados son los siguientes: la semilla no germina, la emergencia de la plántula se retrasa, y aparecen las siguientes condiciones negativas: enanismo, amarillamiento de las hojas, esterilidad apical, emergencia parcial de la panícula, retraso en la floración, alto porcentaje de granos vanos y maduración no uniforme (Yoshida, 1978).Los estudios realizados por Sasaki y Wada (1973) indican que la máxima susceptibilidad del arroz a las temperaturas bajas ocurre durante la época del 'embuchamiento', es decir, de 14 a 17 días antes de la emergencia de la panícula; después de esta época, la 'floración' es la etapa en que el arroz es muy susceptible al frío. No obstante, Shibata et al. (1970) encontró que la planta de arroz sometida a una temperatura baja durante 3 días era más sensible al frío en la floración, y que esa sensibilidad era igual, o incluso mayor, que la manifestada en el 'embuchamiento'.Cuando la temperatura sobrepasa los 35 °C, en la antesis del arroz, y esta exposición al calor pasa de 1 hora, se observa en las plantas un alto porcentaje de esterilidad. Yoshida (1978) informa que las plantas de arroz expuestas a temperaturas superiores a 35 °C sufren daños que dependen de su estado de desarrollo. Por ejemplo, durante la fase vegetativa se observan los siguientes síntomas: la punta blanca de la hoja, las bandas cloróticas, una reducción del macollamiento y una disminución de la altura de la planta. Durante la fase reproductiva aparecen síntomas como la panícula blanca, una reducción del número de granos y una mayor esterilidad; en la etapa de maduración se reduce el número de granos llenos por panícula.El mismo autor concluye que el estado de desarrollo del arroz más sensible a las temperaturas altas es la floración; siguen a ésta los 9 días anteriores a la salida de la panícula en la etapa de 'embuchamiento'. Durante la antesis, 1 ó 2 horas de temperatura alta aumenta definitivamente el porcentaje de esterilidad.En la mayoría de los casos, lo que determina el rendimiento es el número de granos por unidad de área. Yoshida (1978) informa que existe una alta correlación positiva entre el número de granos por unidad de área y el total de nitrógeno tomado por la planta al momento de la floración. Él observó que el número de granos era mayor a medida que aumentaba la cantidad de nitrógeno (N) suministrado. Por otro lado, en un ensayo similar realizado bajo condiciones controladas, se encontró que el número de granos aumentaba a medida que la temperatura disminuía bajo un determinado nivel de N, siendo más evidente este resultado cuando el nivel de N era más alto. Sin embargo, la eficiencia del N para producir granos llegaba a su nivel máximo cuando la temperatura y el nivel de N eran los más bajos (Cuadro 2).Los experimentos realizados por Sasaki et al. (1973) demostraron que el N puede hacer variar el porcentaje de esterilidad que causan las temperaturas bajas cuando las células reproductivas se hallan en la etapa de reducción de la división celular. Cuando la temperatura baja está por encima, o muy por debajo, de la temperatura crítica, el suministro de N tiene muy poco efecto en la esterilidad; en cambio, cuando la temperatura es moderada (16 ºC), el porcentaje de esterilidad aumenta si hay un incremento en el nivel del N aplicado. Otros experimentos reportados por Sasaki y Wada (1975) Tomado de IRRI (1979).cuando la temperatura es baja, puede contrarrestarse con un aumento del nivel del fósforo aplicado (Figura 4).La mayor parte de la energía radiante proveniente del sol tiene una longitud de onda comprendida entre 0.3 y 3.0 micras (o unidad μ = 1 millonésima parte del metro) y por ello se considera, generalmente, como radiación de onda corta. La tierra emite, por su parte, una radiación de onda larga que mide de 3 a 50 micrones.El tejido verde de las hojas utiliza en la fotosíntesis la energía solar cuya longitud de onda tenga de 0.4 a 0.7 micrones;esta energía se denomina en biología 'radiación fotosintética activa' (PAR, del inglés) o, simplemente, radiación solar o luz solar. El total de radiación solar es de 0.50 micrones, aproximadamente, tanto en la zona intertropical (el trópico) como en la zona templada (Monteith, 1972).La unidad de radiación solar que ha resultado más útil para la agricultura es la cal/cm 2 por día, aunque un buen número de físicos y científicos emplean otras unidades. Yoshida (1978) observó que la radiación solar media en 26 sitios de 15 países arroceros variaba, por ejemplo, de 50 cal/cm 2 por día en Milán (Italia) a 700 cal/cm 2 por día o más (en junio-julio) en Lisboa (Portugal) y en Davis (California, EE.UU.). Sin embargo, la mayoría de los sitios mencionados por Yoshida recibe, en promedio, 300 cal/cm 2 por día o un poco más durante el período de maduración del arroz.La radiación solar requerida para el cultivo del arroz varía según los diferentes estados de desarrollo de la planta. Una radiación solar baja afecta muy ligeramente los rendimientos y sus componentes durante la fase vegetativa, mientras que en la fase reproductiva causa una notoria disminución en el número de granos. Por otra parte, durante el período que va del llenado del grano a su maduración, baja drásticamente el rendimiento de la planta cuando se reduce (si se presenta un nivel bajo de radiación solar) el porcentaje de granos llenos.Una relación cuantitativa entre el rendimiento y la radiación solar se puede observar en el Cuadro 3, elaborado por Yoshida y Parao (1976). El cuadro muestra que la radiación solar influye mucho en el rendimiento durante la fase reproductiva de la planta; influye también, aunque menos, en la fase de Figura 4. Efecto de la aplicación de fósforo (P 2 O 5 ) en el porcentaje de esterilidad causado por las temperaturas bajas durante la etapa de reducción de la división de las células reproductivas (Sasaki y Wada, 1975). Partiendo de muchas investigaciones realizadas en diferentes años, se ha concluido que la radiación solar influye en el rendimiento de la planta de arroz, principalmente durante la etapa de maduración del grano, ya que ejerce un notorio efecto en el número de granos llenos de la panícula. Esta conclusión permite afirmar que la traslocación de carbohidratos al grano de arroz ocurre principalmente durante el día, y que alrededor de ¾ del total de los carbohidratos producidos por la planta se elaboran en el día. Bonner y Galston (1952) encontraron que, en general, la traslocación de carbohidratos desde la hoja hacia otros tejidos es inducida por el proceso fotosintético de acumulación específica de azúcar en la lámina foliar. Se puede afirmar entonces que la radiación solar es necesaria no solamente para la asimilación del carbono, sino también para desempeñar un papel importante en la traslocación al grano de los carbohidratos cuya síntesis sigue a la asimilación.En la Figura 6 se observa que el porcentaje de granos llenos aumenta con la intensidad de la luz hasta un valor de ésta de 250 cal/cm 2 por día, y que se incrementa ligeramente cuando esa intensidad es mayor (entre 300 y 450 cal/cm 2 por día). El autor de este trabajo buscó una explicación de dicho resultado y encontró (Figura 7) lo siguiente: hay una relación similar entre la tasa de asimilación del carbono y la intensidad solar, y la intensidad solar superior a 0.6 cal/cm 2 por min no tiene casi influencia en la tasa de asimilación del carbono.De las Figuras 6 y 7 se puede deducir que la relación entre el porcentaje de granos llenos y la intensidad de la luz se puede considerar dependiente de la relación entre la tasa de asimilación de carbono y la intensidad de la luz solar.Cuadro 3. Efecto del descenso de la radiación solar (medida en tres fases del desarrollo de la planta) en el rendimiento y en los componentes del rendimiento de la variedad de arroz IR-747B2-6. Radiación solar (cal/cm 2 por día) Se puede afirmar finalmente que, cuando la intensidad de la luz es baja, el porcentaje de granos llenos puede aumentar si se incrementa la luz solar; en cambio, si la intensidad de la luz supera cierto nivel establecido como crítico, el porcentaje de granos llenos no aumentará al incrementar la luz solar en la forma en que lo hizo en el caso anterior.La fotosíntesis es el proceso en que la energía solar es atrapada por el tejido verde de las plantas y convertida en energía química, que es almacenada en forma de carbohidratos. De 80% a 90% (en peso) de la materia seca de las plantas verdes proviene de la fotosíntesis; el resto viene, normalmente, del suelo en los minerales absorbidos por las raíces de las plantas.En un cultivo de arroz, la fotosíntesis depende, principalmente, de la incidencia (cantidad y ángulo) de la radiación solar, de su relación con el área foliar (tasa/ unidad de área), del índice de área foliar y de la orientación de las hojas. Si la radiación solar es baja, la tasa de fotosíntesis también será baja (Tsunoda, 1972;Tsunoda et al., 1968).El agua es indispensable para la planta de arroz. El contenido de agua de la planta varía según la estructura considerada (hoja, tallo) y el estado de desarrollo de la planta. La planta absorbe por las raíces la mayor parte del agua que necesita; emplea menos del 15% del agua absorbida y transpira el resto a través de los estomas de las hojas. El adecuado suministro de agua es uno de los factores más importantes de la producción de arroz. Muchas áreas productoras de arroz sufren por exceso de agua o por sequía, ya sea porque las lluvias son irregulares o porque falla el suministro de riego.La principal razón para inundar un cultivo de arroz es que la mayoría de las variedades de arroz crecen mejor y dan mayor rendimiento cuando se cultivan en un suelo inundado. Esta agua cumple tres funciones esenciales:• Modificar las características físicas de la planta.• Cambiar las características físicoquímicas y el estado nutricional y físico de los suelos. En un cultivo de arroz con riego se pierde agua por la transpiración de las plantas, por la evaporación en la superficie del agua y por percolación a través del suelo. Las pérdidas por percolación son las más variables y dependen de condiciones del suelo como la textura, la topografía y el nivel freático.La cantidad de agua requerida por el arroz en diferentes funciones y etapas del sistema con riego se presenta en el Cuadro 4. Las cifras son promedios de un rango de valores reportado por más de 40 países cultivadores de arroz.El arroz se cultiva no sólo con sistemas de riego, sino en zonas bajas con alta precipitación, en láminas de agua profunda y en condiciones de secano (lluvia estacional y suelo bien drenado). En las tierras bajas, las plantas de arroz están expuestas a daños debidos a la sumersión en los sistemas de inundación; en las zonas altas, en cambio, pueden sufrir los efectos de la sequía, que se presenta con frecuencia.Se ha informado también que la precipitación fuerte puede agravar el volcamiento de las plantas, porque las hojas largas y cargadas de humedad son pesadas y, cuando tienden a juntarse, hacen volcar la planta (Kung, 1971).Cuando se cultiva arroz con agua de lluvias y la temperatura está en el rango de los niveles críticos, la precipitación es el factor limitativo del desarrollo. Cuando se cultiva arroz con riego, el crecimiento y el rendimiento de las plantas están determinados, en gran parte, por la temperatura y por la radiación solar.La transpiración es la pérdida de agua en forma de vapor a través de la superficie total de la planta. La planta se marchitará o morirá, a menos que se le suministre agua para sustituir la que pierde por transpiración. Este fenómeno ocurre principalmente a través de los estomas de las hojas y, en pequeña proporción, por la cutícula foliar y la de otros tejidos.La pérdida de agua por transpiración está directamente relacionada con la tasa de crecimiento absoluto (TCA), de manera que la transpiración puede considerarse Cuadro 4. Agua requerida por el arroz cultivado con riego.Por pérdida en plantas (uso fisiológico) y en suelo (agua subterránea) (mm/día) Tomado de Kung (1971).como los gramos de agua transpirada por cada gramo de materia seca producida. Esta relación varía según la humedad del suelo, el clima, la variedad, el estado de desarrollo de la planta y el momento del cultivo. Según Matsushima et al. (1964) y Yoshida (1978), esta relación está entre 250 y 350 g de agua por gramo de materia seca producida.Los suelos en que puede desarrollarse el arroz son tan variados como el rango de climas a que se expone el cultivo. Su textura varía de arenosa a arcillosa; su pH oscila entre extremos de 3.0 y 10.0; su contenido de materia orgánica puede estar entre 1% y 50%; su concentración de sales entre 0 y 1%; y su disponibilidad de nutrientes puede ir desde la deficiencia notoria hasta el exceso. Dos factores determinan, en gran parte, la productividad de la tierra en que se siembra arroz: las condiciones del suelo y el agua disponible.El arroz es la única especie comercial que se cultiva en suelos saturados de agua (en algunos sistemas, las plantas se mantienen sumergidas) durante una parte (o la totalidad) del ciclo de vida de las plantas; por tal razón, las propiedades físicas del suelo tienen menor importancia relativa que el suministro adecuado de agua.La textura del suelo tiene un papel muy importante en el manejo del agua de riego y de la fertilización. Si la textura es fina, el tamaño pequeño de los poros del suelo sólo permite un movimiento lento del agua; en cambio, si la textura del suelo es liviana, el excesivo suministro de agua y de fertilizantes aumenta las pérdidas de ambos recursos por causa del lavado y de la percolación.El arroz soporta bien los suelos cuyo pH esté entre 4.0 y 8.4; sin embargo, se desarrolla mejor cuando la acidez de éstos no baja del pH 5.0 ni sobrepasa el pH 6.5. El arroz tolera bastante bien la salinidad y se obtienen buenas producciones de grano en suelos salinos; estos suelos, a su vez, son lavados por los continuos riegos que se dan a las plantas en el sistema con riego.El viento desempeña un papel importante en la vida de la planta de arroz. Se ha informado que, cuando el viento sopla con poca velocidad, el rendimiento de la planta aumenta gracias a la turbulencia que se crea en medio de la comunidad de plantas. En los años 70, algunos investigadores japoneses hallaron que la tasa de fotosíntesis era mayor cuando aumentaba suavemente la velocidad del viento, ya que la turbulencia incrementaba el suministro de gas carbónico (CO 2 ); este resultado confirmaba el obtenido en los 60 por un investigador australiano de que una velocidad del viento mayor que el rango de 0.3 a 0.9 m/seg causaba un pequeño efecto en la fotosíntesis de la planta.Por otro lado, los vientos fuertes con características de vendaval son perjudiciales para las plantas de arroz, puesto que incrementan el fenómeno del volcamiento. Los vientos muy secos han causado secamiento en las hojas, que es grave para los cultivos de secano. Los vientos secos y calientes han producido laceraciones en las hojas y en los granos y, en muchos casos, han hecho abortar las flores.La evaporación es un fenómeno inverso de la humedad relativa, que se puede definir como el vapor de agua ya contenido en el aire. Se ha demostrado que, manteniendo los demás factores constantes, un aumento de la humedad relativa reduce la intensidad de la evapotranspiración, puesto que el gradiente de presión de vapor de agua entre la atmósfera y una superficie húmeda es alto. La capacidad del aire para retener vapor de agua aumenta rápidamente con la temperatura: por tanto, el aire caliente del trópico contiene más vapor de agua que el aire frío de otras zonas."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2840247743.json b/main/part_2/2840247743.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e2f9080100135e4c50b432f223cdae194d99259 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2840247743.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2adb7a9c38e34061d5a9cce3c1a9f713","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c6c52be5-c83a-40a1-882b-2598af16f9a9/retrieve","id":"-376202582"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7abf703f-d0e4-40b0-89ea-c6d9bd531caf","content":"Crop production in Kenya is over 90% rainfed, making it highly vulnerable to changing weather patterns and extreme weather events, such as droughts and floods. In the recent past, many parts of Kenya have suffered droughts, while at the same time other parts have endured flooding because of intense rain causing major crop losses leading to food insecurity. There are currently about 1.3 million Kenyans chronically foodinsecure due to drought conditions, primarily in ASALs, which increases to 3.4-3.7 million Kenyans during severe droughts. It is further estimated that 9 out of 10 crops will experience reduced growth rates (10-20%) with dramatic price increases (45-90%) by 2030 in part due to climate change. Beyond crop losses, these extreme events lead to loss of farm income, market instability and impacts on trade. These severe climate change impacts show that Kenya needs to make a paradigm shift in managing agriculture and invest in climate-smart agricultural practices to match the changing environment and increase productivity. Furthermore, compounded climate factors can decrease plant productivity, resulting in price increases for many important agricultural crops.Timely interventions and support to farmers are urgently required to mitigate these events. Given the national economic, food security, nutritional and health importance of crop production, there is an opportunity for national policies on agriculture and climate change to support a more robust and resilient future for Kenya's food production.TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS: Kenya's average annual temperature has increased by 1°C since 1961, though this hides considerable variation: temperatures in western Kenya rose by 0.5°C, while in the drier parts of the country, temperatures went up by 1.5°C during the same period. Extreme climate events have become increasingly frequent in recent years, with direct negative consequences for annual agricultural production. Projections suggest further increases in mean annual temperature of 1.5°C to 2°C by 2030 and up to 3°C by the 2050s. In addition to rising temperatures, rainfall is projected to change in timing of the onset, distribution across the country, amount, and cessation of season, with extremes of too little and too much rain becoming more common. This causes impacts to crop productivity and other affects, such as land and soil degradation. Maize and beans-Kenya's most commonly grown crops-are projected to be most severely impacted by the changing climate, whereas sorghum, millet, cassava and potatoes are projected to be less impacted by climate change. 1. DEVELOP Kenya's long-term vision for climate change and agriculture and contribute to updating the agriculture component of Kenya's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).2. STRENGTHEN the coordination of climate change issues in the agricultural sector.3. STRENGTHEN acquisition and dissemination of climate data and information for enhanced advisories to farmers through extension services and ICTs.4. SUPPORT research, technology development, innovation and application of climate risk management tools and smart management practices, such as Early Warning Systems (EWSs), climate-smart micro-lending, food security risk financing and agricultural insurance along with providing incentives for increased private sector participation.5. IMPROVE a holistic and inclusive soil carbon, soil health and soil fertility alongside nutrient management mechanism/system that ensure realization of the full potential for increased productivity in contributing to food and nutrition security, adaptation and mitigation co-benefits. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2840790271.json b/main/part_2/2840790271.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..770f25df87afe2f3a3b6abe0ccb8fd3a40744e04 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2840790271.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5fd4745abaa37943d0337e13eca52140","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1288cb9f-c27b-48ef-8ce8-2486bfc0806a/retrieve","id":"1704610673"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a45d22ac-a9fd-4da1-8a44-02d146140fd9","content":"The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publishers and partners concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this information product are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the institutions mentioned.Cover photos Chafa Spring, Kenya (Hanspeter LinigerEcosystems and their services -livestock and non-livestock rangeland production, wildlife and tourism -can only be sustained and improved if the resources they provide and the people who depend on them are healthy.Rangelands take pride of place among Sub-Saharan Africa's varied ecosystems. They make up nearly half (48 percent) of the land, or up to 62 percent if woodlands are included, and provide a rich range of resources, including soils, water, vegetation and genetic diversity. These landscapes also have a critical role to play in achieving multiple development gains, including food and nutrition security, water, rural jobs, livelihoods and growth in rapidly transforming economies; climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts; as well as peace, security, stability and natural resource-related conflict prevention.More specifically, Sub-Saharan Africa's rangelands feed over 55 percent of Africa's livestock and provide a major source of income to 268 million pastoralists and agro-pastoralists, including in some of the most vulnerable areas.These Guidelines on Sustainable Rangeland Management in Sub-Saharan Africa come at a critical moment. Rangelands are under growing pressure from land degradation as well as crop and urban land expansion, among other threats. Moreover, the capacity of rangelands to sustainably supply markets will be tested over the coming decade as the global and regional demand for beef and sheep continues to grow. African governments, stakeholders and other partners are fortunately taking note of the importance of rangelands. For example, the African Union has contributed to the renewed promotion of pastoralism under its 2013 Policy Framework for Pastoralism in Africa. Similarly, the World Bank, along with Sahelian countries, regional organizations and the UN, has committed to promote it under the Declaration of Nouakchott on pastoralism in the Sahel in 2013. In addition, considering their spatial dominance, rangelands should continue to receive sustained attention within the land, forest restoration and climate change commitments made by governments. This interest by governments in sustainably managing rangelands has increased demand for technical information and guidance on how this can be done. That's where we think these guidelines, which synthesize recent knowledge and practices about managing rangelands effectively, will be particularly useful.This substantial piece of work was prepared by Swiss-based Centre for Development and Environment and the World Overview on Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT) network for the World Bank on behalf of the TerrAfrica partnership on Sustainable Land Management (SLM). The 30 new case studies presented in this research cover the different regions of Sub-Saharan Africa and a diverse range of practices and systems, from small scale settled pasture to bounded rangelands with wildlife management and pastoral rangelands.We expect that these guidelines will also contribute to informing the necessary dialogue between rangeland stakeholders dealing for example with livestock, protected areas, wildlife, agriculture and forests. Since knowledge is constantly being developed, we hope these guidelines will stimulate further work to assess, document and share more rangeland management practices, stimulate knowledge exchanges between Africa's regions, and hence inform the preparation and implementation of impactful interventions in Africa's valuable rangelands.Diverse landscapes in the Sub-Saharan rangelands. Of special attraction to wildlife, livestock and their herders are water sources and seasonal rivers. These also provide grazing grounds, and rich habitats for wildlife as well as opportunities for tourism. Buffalo Springs, Kenya § (Hanspeter Liniger).are trekked or trucked from the Sahel to coastal countries in West Africa (de Haan et al. 2016).Furthermore, rangelands in Sub-Saharan Africa are increasingly being recognised as providing a wide variety of ecosystem services, and while many of these do not have any direct market value, they represent a key role. Rangelands are home to wide variety of ecosystems with extraordinary biodiversity. Their unique wildlife, and especially the 'charismatic megafauna' -rhino, lion, leopard, elephant, buffalo, giraffe, zebra and others -remain a magnet for tourism (Balmford et al. 2015). Benefits for society include the provision of a wide range of products from meat, milk, hides and wool, to non-livestock rangeland products (NLRP) of fibre, fruits, medicinal and cosmetic products, minerals and oil. Importantly, discussion is opening up about the regulating ecosystem processes of rangelands. These include climate regulation and flood control. Furthermore, the sheer size of rangelands makes them significant contributors to global carbon sequestration and storage (Reynolds and Buendia 2017). Rangelands are also important in the context of cultural services, with their strong links to ethnic identity of many pastoral and agro-pastoral groups. All-in-all, these services, which are often of national and global importance, are not sufficiently appreciated and valued by policy makers, by implementing agencies or by the public at large.Since the domestication and introduction of livestock several thousand years ago, the influence of pastoralists and their animals has grown to the point that they now dominate both the ecological processes and the economies of large tracts of Africa's rangelands (du Toit andCumming 1999, Hempson et al. 2017). In those parts of the rangelands occupied by pastoralists, their management has had a significant impact on the vegetation -and this varies from location to location. Profound local knowledge about fauna, flora, water sources and the landscape has informed a wide range of traditional and indigenous rangeland management practices -as explored in these guidelines. However, the mechanisms and patterns of pastoral managementChapter 1 Setting the scene and aim of these guidelinesIn Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the popular perception of rangelands and their management is almost always negative. These vast areas are seen as a problem without a solution: the common narrative focuses on overgrazing, herds of undernourished livestock, erosion and desertification, drought, famine, and conflict. However, evidence compiled and analysed in this book show that such a view of rangelands -as being unproductive and mismanaged systems -does not reflecting reality. It needs reconsideration and revision. Indeed the considerable contribution of rangelands to livelihoods and national economies is being increasingly recognised (Behnke et al. 1993, Davies and Hatfield 2007, Vetter et al. 2013, Kratli 2015). While acknowledging the very specific and widespread challenges of the rangelands, a profound reassessment of their role and potential is emerging. This change in position has been informed by better understanding and appreciation of their social, ecological and economical dynamics, and the management systems that have developed over centuries -and are still evolving. Nevertheless, there remains confusion about many aspects, and the discourse around rangelands is full of contradictory statements and differing conclusions about their importance, role and future.While different definitions of rangelands exist, it is undisputed that their spatial extent is enormous, there is a wide variety of land management practices and uses, and their impacts on the environment, ecosystems and livelihoods are huge. Thus, it is common to find statements that underestimate the economic role of rangelands in Sub-Saharan Africa -and can be simply contradicted by facts. In the broad belt from Mauritania in the west, across through Mali, Niger, Chad, Sudan, Ethiopia and on to Somalia in the east -the livestock sector is hugely significant. Meat and milk production typically comprise up to 60% of agricultural GDP and 5-15% of total GDP (de Haan et al. 2016).Often overlooked, the drylands livestock sector is also an important source of foreign exchange. Millions of sheep are shipped every year from the Horn of Africa to the Gulf States, and more than one million head of cattle each yearChapter 1 Setting the scene and aim of these guidelinesDifferent rangelands: from desert fringes with sandstorms, Namibia (left) to grasslands close to forested hills and mountains in Kenya (centre) to the wetlands of river deltas, Okavango, Botswana (right). and their changes over time have been poorly understood, respected or valued by non-pastoral communities since the start of the colonial era. Much of the most productive pasture has been converted into crop farming, cross-border and regional mobility has been constrained, traditional governance systems have been undermined, and there are ever-increasing claims on the land from both non-pastoral communities and external investors.Many associated development policies have undermined the integrity of traditional and innovative local rangeland management systems. Such systems have evolved together with the changing environment and climatic patterns over thousands of years. Cultural institutions and traditional governance structures that had managed natural resources have been eroded in many locations.Unsurprisingly, there have been widespread disruptions to rangeland management. These have been further fuelled by other factors, including the continued growth in human population increasing demand for agricultural products, security threats created by livestock rustling, trafficking of arms and open domestic and international conflicts, and more recently the growing reality of climate change and associated extreme events.Rangelands in SSA have regularly been reported as being some of the most degraded ecosystems in Africa: \"mismanagement\" is often cited as the underlying reason. Specialists and development reporters are quick to diagnose degradation in the rangelands -but equally slow to suggest sound and sustainable remedies to guide policy makers. Meanwhile it usually goes unnoticed that a share of rangeland areas and the livestock they support are sustainably managed. This may be based on traditional community practices, or through the introduction of innovative methods, or, increasingly, a combination of the two. As this book shows, there are many and varied experiences in sustainable rangeland management (SRM) in SSA. These embrace a wide range of different land/ resource management practices in different ecosystems. Without doubt, there is a knowledge base that is continuously evolving -yet is hardly known to the wider development community. On the other hand, there is also considerable technical expertise, information, and knowledge about current rangeland issues in SSA, which is fragmented and largely hidden.Exchange of experience and knowledge between African countries and institutions remains weak and localised, with minimal opportunities for \"cross-fertilization\". Furthermore, there is no comprehensive, contemporary compilation of rangeland management knowledge and practices in SSA. Their evolution and recent adaptations to a changing human and natural environment remain mainly unknown.The growing knowledge about rangeland management has not been synthesized or disseminated.The overall goal of the guidelines is to contribute to improved rangeland management by illustrating a wide range of innovative rangeland management practices, grouping them, clarifying their characteristics and requirements, and by illustrating their impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing. The ultimate aim is to demonstrate -through this unique set of convincing case studies -the value and potential of investment in rangelands. It is also hoped that this exercise will stimulate, and assist, the identification of further cases. The guidelines attempt to provide: 1. A practical guideline for the formulation of rangeland policies and investments programmes in rangelands 2. A common knowledge base for improved decision-making 3. A starting point for 'how-to-do' that can be complemented and expanded in future 4. The basis for knowledge sharing workshops and programmes with various African stakeholders, and training beyond the mere dissemination of these guidelines 5. An attractive, illustrative, straightforward and readerfriendly book to help inform the future development of SRM.This book is meant, in particular, for those involved in programmes and projects, specialists, and rangeland users to use the wealth of their experiences for improved decisionmaking, in order to upscale and outscale SRM. The target group thus comprises:• Professionals who design and implement rangeland projects • Technical support/ extension services, project implementers/ advisors and other actors working at field level • National/local leaders and decision/ policy makers involved in rangeland policies • Research organisations focussing on rangelands and their management • Development partners at international and regional levels • Knowledge and information services in or related to SSA-Saharan countries • Livestock owners/ keepers, conservationists and other rangeland users • The broader public -to raise awareness about, and engagement in, SRM.left: Typical savannah rangelands with grassland and a wetland in the background offering rich habitat diversity and refuge for wildlife such as buffaloes and egret herons, Chafa wetlands, Kenya (Hanspeter Liniger).centre: Chafa spring in a protected area in Kenya fenced against intrusion of animals at the head of the spring, 2016. Wildlife and livestock have access to the water below the spring head (Hanspeter Liniger).right: The same Chafa spring during a prolonged drought period in 2018. The fence has been removed and livestock have been watered in the fragile spring source zone. This illustrates the challenge of sustainable rangeland management with increasing pressure by users and within high natural and climate variability (Hanspeter Liniger).Chapter 1 Setting the scene and aim of these guidelines Given the vast variety of different environments and rangeland management practices and the large rangeland area in SSA, this book presents a selection of case studies. It cannot be comprehensive: it is impossible to do full justice to what is currently underway. Despite efforts to compile a full representation of SRM practices, there remain gaps in terms of regions and practices. The guidelines offer neither \"one-size-fits all\" solutions nor comprehensive \"how-to-do\" instructions. However, it is hoped that the book will stimulate the further compilation and identification of options and potentials for spreading SRM in SSA. The more knowledge and data is collected that covers different/ all regions and a wide range of SRM practices, the better the evidence base for decision-making.Thus, this book aims to identify \"good practice\", taking lessons from both the ancient and the modern, and steer a new course that will encourage managers across the continent to restore and improve sustainable management of the rangeland. The guidelines present a compilation of a wide range of sustainable rangeland management practices from Sub-Saharan Africa, for different rangeland use systems (RUS) and different SRM groups. These include indigenous and traditional practices, innovations, trials, and emerging trends implemented by the land users themselves, and/or various agencies and research institutions.At the outset, concepts of rangeland management are discussed, a working definition proposed and an operational classification system set out. Challenges faced in rangeland management, with potential solutions and their impact on natural resources, as well as ecosystem services, are discussed and synthesized. Supported by the literature, this is based on an analysis of the SRM practices from SSA documented in the global sustainable land management (SLM) database of WOCAT (World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies). Forty-two (42) approaches and 69 technologies from the WOCAT SLM global database have been included in the data analysis. The cases are distributed over a number of countries (Figure 1.1). Of these, 28 approaches and 28 technologies are newly documented.Part 1 is composed of five chapters, which contribute as follows:• Chapter 1: An introduction to the rangelands and to these guidelines. • Chapter 2: Defining the rangelands begins with, in 2.1, key characteristics such as vegetation cover, the climate with a focus on droughts, the inhabitants, livelihoods, land tenure, user rights, conflict, protected areas, fire and land degradation. In 2.2 there is an overview of the importance of the rangelands underpinned by data. 2.3 then goes on to look at 'changing concepts' of rangelands and development issues over the last century. divided into 6 categories, and in 3.2 Sustainable Rangeland Management (SRM) groups are categorised into 9 types. Each is explained. • Chapter 4: Drivers, land management responses, impacts and change are covered in five sections. In 4.1 the key drivers are identified, and then in 4.2 SRM practices are presented and analysed. 4.3 looks at the impact of SRM on the 'health' of the land, and 4.4 focuses specifically on SRM and its effect on ecosystem services and people. 4.5 then analyses feedback mechanisms on the drivers. • Chapter 5: The way forward is summarised -tying together what has been discussed in 6 sub-sections covering the need for a greater focus on rangelands (in 5.1), principles of SRM technologies (5.2), principles of SRM approaches (5.3), capacity requirements (5.4), the future of rangelands (5.5) and finally how to overcome barriers to SRM (5.6). Through this chapter, there are \"Focus boxes\", which encapsulate the key guidelines themselves.Part 2 of the guidelines provides case studies classified in five SRM technology groups and four approach groups. For each group, examples of \"good practice\" case studies have been selected and are presented in a standardized and consistent format -as pioneered by WOCAT.Additional practices included in the analysis but not presented in Part 2 are listed in the Annex and are available in the WOCAT database 1 .The process: From the very beginning of the exercise, it was evident that rangeland management was very complex and extremely challenging and developing rangeland management guidelines would require considerable support and commitment from local and regional rangeland specialists and practitioners. The strategy adopted was to compile case studies and examples from the field that were as comprehensive and diverse as possible. Then through analysing and synthesising the results, to try to come up with guiding principles and best practices for rangeland management.Finding the right partners with the knowledge and experience to identify and document the wide variety of current successful and innovative good rangeland management practices was a challenge. It was felt important from the start that there should be co-ownership by African institutions as a prerequisite to a widely accepted and supported process and product.Two workshops with local and regional rangeland specialists from different organisations and institutions were held: in Nairobi, Kenya during August 2016, and then Pretoria, South Africa in February 2018. During the first workshop, ten experts from West, East and Southern Africa brainstormed on how to structure the book, how to involve key partners, how to compile the available knowledge related to rangeland management and which specific practices to document in details. Nine experts came together in the second workshop to review the draft, discuss results from the data analysed and identify gaps in the documentation of interventions where attention was still required.Throughout the whole process of working on the book, documentation of good rangeland management practices was ongoing, and there was a continuous feedback loop to ensure that the cases were complete and the data robust.Challenges were faced in compiling a full set of representative, good quality case studies. Rangelands, by their nature are often remote, and contact with people working there was difficult. Another problem is that experiences and knowledge are scattered. Furthermore, in contrast to cropland, the complexity of rangelands and the associated management systems is much higher. This made the compilation of the case studies all the more complicated.The involvement of a number of key experts from different organisations during and outside the workshops has been a big asset -and needless to say without them this book would not have been possible. However, specialists come with their own experience, institutional background, language, agenda, visions and beliefs: this meant that there needed to be a very careful and complex process of sorting out and editing. The aim was to represent various opinions while seeking common denominators in experiences.It has not been an easy exercise, but having in mind the complexity of rangelands and the vast diversity of users and organizations involved, hopefully this publication leads to a better appreciation and understanding of rangeland management, does justice to rangelands and the people that manage them, and supports current and triggers new initiatives for sustainable rangeland management worldwide and specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa. centre: Typical savannah -grasslands dominated by spread-out acacia trees and grasslands at the foot of Kilimanjaro (Hanspeter Liniger).right: Herd of cattle moving within a river bed, Kenya (Ibrahim Jarso).Chapter 2 Sub-Saharan Africa rangelands defined1 Area of Africa south of the Sahara and the 20 degrees north latitude lineHorn and East Africa, the closed forests of Central Africa and the wet mountain areas in East and Southern Africa.Towards the croplands and forests the boundaries are not sharp, and there is some overlap. The transition zones in the three regions of SSA is illustrated in the inserts of Figure 2.1. Mainly driven by rainfall availability and seasonality, there is a gradual transition from sparse grassland at the dry end of the scale, through grassland, open shrubland, savannah, woodland, and on to dense woodland at the wetter end of the climate spectrum.Low temperatures limiting the growth of vegetation in SSA's rangelands occur in Southern Africa during the winter, with average temperatures of 5-10 degrees. Other areas affected by cold are the mountain regions of the Horn and East Africa, where there are merely patches of rangelands amongst the croplands and forests. Apart from these areas, there are no low temperature restrictions to continuous growth of vegetation. However, high temperatures where averages reach 30 degrees or more put stress on the vegetation -when moisture availability becomes the limiting factor under the dry conditions of many rangelands. This is the case for most of the year for the West African Sahel and the lowlands of the Horn and East Africa (Figure 2.2a).Looking at seasonal rainfall (Figure 2.2b) this clearly depicts the movement of the inner tropical convergence zone, with its associated rainy seasons starting in the first quarter of the year in the south (southern summer) and reaching the north in the third quarter of the year after the peak of the northern summer. In the second and last quarters of the year, the main rains fall in the inner tropics within the equatorial zone. This implies that this zone has a bimodal rainfall regime (two rainy seasons each year), whereas the northern and southern areas in the subtropical zones around the Tropic of Cancer and Capricorn only have one rainy season (a unimodal regime) with a single prolonged dry season.Whether a region has one or two rainy seasons has significant implications on forage reserves and the movement of animals -as the unimodal regime dry season is aroundChapter 2 Sub-Saharan Africa rangelands definedThere exist numerous definitions of rangelands. For these guidelines the definitions of Blench and Sommer 1999, Allen et al. 2011, McGahey et al. 2014 are merged.\"Rangelands are spatially defined ecosystems that are dominated by grasses, grass-like plants, combined with various degrees of bush and tree cover that are predominantly grazed or browsed, and which are used as a natural and semi-natural ecosystem for the production of livestock and safeguarding of wildlife and additional ecosystem services.\"Rangelands in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 1 cover areas with a broad span of characteristics: vegetation and cover (grasses alone, or combined with bushes and trees), topography (mostly gentle slopes, but some hills and mountains or escarpments especially in East Africa), water (high variability of access to surface water, with a mixture of seasonal and some perennial sources, and often access to groundwater) and use (grazing and browsing by wildlife and/ or livestock).The type and use of rangeland is, in turn, determined by the climate (rainfall and temperature), climate variability and change, fire whether natural or human-induced, but also topography and altitude.The maps of rangeland derived from vegetation and land use data, resemble a banana-shape around the forests of Central Africa -the \"SSA rangeland crescent\". They stretch from the Sahelian zone of West Africa to Sudan and the lowlands in the Horn and East Africa, to Southern Africa. Rangeland limits are determined by aridity of the deserts in the north towards the Sahara, and in the south to the southwestern deserts of the Namib and Kalahari. Rangelands are also limited by the wetter spectrum of the climate, towards conditions more favourable for cropping -for example in the southern regions of the Sahel, the highlands of the seven to nine months while the bimodal regime has two dry periods of around two to three months each. Where there is only one rainfall season, a failure can be catastrophic, while with two seasons a single failure can be partially compensated by the second rains -as in the equatorial zone (Figure 2.2b). Additionally, in the equatorial and northern hemisphere, there is rainfall gradient from the west with higher amounts, to the east with lower rainfall; in the southern hemisphere it is the opposite. This can be attributed to global atmospheric circulations and warm, or cold, sea currents. Rainfall, its variability, reliability and seasonality is the main driver of production in the rangelands of SSA.With the movement of the rains the vegetation growth and the available biomass changes, as indicated by the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) \"greenness\" value (Figure 2.2c). This index picks up the movement of the greenness and availability of fresh fodder. It clearly indicates if animals (whether wildlife or livestock) will need to follow the available fodder through migration, or whether they will have enough biomass production during the rains to tide them over the dry season.The high variability and unpredictability of rainfall, in both space and time, characterises rangelands, and gives rise to heterogeneous forage resources. This heterogeneity is a defining feature of rangeland ecology. Both wildlife and livestock require mobility at a scale which allows them to adapt to, and capitalise upon, this inherent variability (see Chapter 3.1.1). Climatic variability also leads to challenges of water scarcity, both seasonally and spatially, which affects rangeland ecology and limits both land use and management options. While rainfall is the primary factor governing plant growth and productivity, water availability also depends on the landform. While mountains in Africa are often termed \"water towers\" (Liniger and Thomas 1998, Liniger and Weingartner 2000, Notter et al. 2007), the rangelands can equally claim to be important \"water reservoirs\". Vast rangelands situated in dry lowlands are often connected with wetter and resource-richer mountains. Perennial and seasonal rivers and \"wetlands in drylands\" are strongly depend on water and land use in the mountain areas. Depressions in the landscape create wetlands, swamps and floodplains, all acting as reservoirs and this concentration of water is a vital resource because it provides a source of drinking water (in places) and creates pockets -microclimates -of high productivity within the overall rangelands. There are many wetlands and lakes situated in the rangelands of SSA -receiving flows directly from the drylands and the mountain areas and providing services for rangeland users: Lake Victoria is one, Lake Chad and Lake Tabalak (in Niger) are other large and significant lakes with associated wetland. Rivers bring water from mountains to drylands provide special habitats and valuable resource along their riparian zones and end up in swamps, wetlands, lakes and deltas. Examples are the expanses of the Okavango swamp in Botswana (Murray et al. 2006, see Box 4.23), the Gash Delta in Sudan, the extensive and biodiverse Masura swamp adjacent to the Serengeti in Tanzania, the Niger in West Africa, and the Ewaso Ng'iro in with the Lorian Swamps in Northern Kenya. All have a massive impact on rangelands.In the West African Sahel, sub-surface water stored beneath the drylands, dependent on rainfall infiltration, constitutes a lifeline to inhabitants who tap into it through wells.A drought is a continuous period of dry weather, when an area receives below-average rainfall, over weeks, months or even years, resulting in prolonged shortages of water supply.As rainfall is such a strong driver of conditions in the rangelands, drought periods closely affect water availability for the vegetation, animals and people. Impacts range from mild to severe. Droughts are characteristic of climate variability in the rangelands. The regular -but inherently unpredictable -reoccurrence of droughts is stressful to vegetation and thus forage availability for livestock and wildlife. Forty-three percent of globally recorded droughts between 1975 and 2014 occured in Africa -the continent most affected (Figure 2.3).Changes in the frequency of droughts show that rangeland regions most affected are found in West Africa (Chad, Mali, Mauritania and Nigeria) and in Angola and Zambia. The Horn of Africa and western parts of Southern Africa have decreasing drought frequencies (Figure 2.4).At the global level, a hotter and (often) drier climate coupled with more uncertain precipitation for most of Sub-Saharan Africa is projected (IPCC 2014). At the regional and local level, impacts will manifest themselves mainly through the increase in frequency and severity of dry weather conditions, and through altered patterns of precipitation. Interannual and intra-annual variability (year-to-year, and within years and seasons), especially in terms of precipitation, are expected to increase. The main challenge of climate change for livestock and wildlife is that hotter conditions will mean longer and more severe dry seasons, and increasingly patchy and unpredictable rainfall will make it more difficult to access fresh high-quality grazing. This is being exacerbated by growing fragmentation of rangelands and associated reduced mobility, resulting in an inability to reach critical seasonal habitats such as areas of drought-reserve forage in high rainfall regions or wetlands (Homewood 2009, Fynn et al. 2015). The Mediterranean areas of both North Africa and Southern Africa are likely to receive less rain, whereas, contrastingly, precipitation could increase in East Africa (Hoffman and Vogel 2008). The continued warming of Sub-Saharan Africa is projected to result in temperatures 2-4 degrees higher by the end of the century (IPCC 2013, Serdeczny et al. 2017). Such increases will most likely be greater in Northern and Southern Africa than in the moister areas of West, Central and East Africa (Hoffman and Vogel 2008). This will have impacts on the production potential of rangelands, and at a broader level on various rangelandbased ecosystem services. A recent analysis of the Mount Kenya area and its surrounding drylands, using the densest and longest possible data records from early colonial times Drought frequency change of Africa relative to other areas, due to their remoteness but also to a long history of marginalisation of rangeland users (Holechek et al. 2017).Additionally, many inhabitants rely on animal products (meat, milk, blood, hides and skins) to buy their daily diet, which is generally based on cereals, most often purchased from agricultural neighbours or on the open market. Even though they produce a variety of different items for their livelihoods, they still depend heavily on the rains, and thus are very vulnerable to unpredictable stressors, especially droughts and land degradation. Poverty diminishes the adaptability of rangeland users, reducing the resilience of communities to shocks. Compounding these problems is the fact that these stressors do not work in isolation. When coupled with poor management practices, development priorities and policies (especially those that undermine traditional rangeland management strategies), risks and vulnerabilities will continue to increase.The need to increase productivity is indeed high on the agenda of the African Union and is documented in the poverty reduction strategies of many states, for example Les Nigériens nourrissent 2 , the Food and Nutrition Policy for Tanzania 3 , Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper of Mozambique 4 .Many rangeland inhabitants are involved in complex livelihood systems that include a variety of non-livestock rangeland products (NLRP). There are many non-livestock rangeland products already commercially viable-tapping biodiversity.Medicinal products are to be found in the driest of regions (e.g. the endemic \"devils claw\", Harpagophytum procumbens, as a treatment for arthritis), some foods and beverages are also endemic (e.g. Rooibos, Aspalathus linearis, infused as a tea and has growing popularity worldwide) and the widely used, commercially valuable gum arabic (from Acacia senegal) is found across most of the rangelands (some starting in the 1920s), revealed the \"long rains\" (April-June) to be decreasing in amount while the \"short rains\" (October-December) were increasing (Schmocker et al. 2015, Box 2.1). The total annual rainfall showed a slightly increasing trend. Rainfall intensities, as well as the length of dry spells, also showed an upturn, indicating more erosive and more erratic rains. However, there were marked differences within the region, depending on their position in relation to the mountains.The aridity index is defined as the ratio of precipitation over potential evapotranspiration (the amount of water needed to maintain constant green vegetation cover). For the immediate future, 2011-2040 aridity as an indicator of expected climate change shows that most of the SSA region will get drier, especially in Southern Africa. The rangelands in East Africa are expected to get wetter, as is the northern fringe of the Sahel. Only in those regions where the aridity index is increasing -meaning areas are expected to become less arid -will the impact of climate change trigger better vegetation growth; in all the other areas the water stress on the vegetation will increase (Figure 2.5).Rangelands in SSA are inhabited by 384 million people (Figure 2.6), at an average density of 27 people per square kilometre (in 2015). Population density within of the rangeland crescent is the highest in the wetter parts (towards the cropland regions, as clearly illustrated in Burkina Faso and northern parts of Nigeria, as well as the highland of Ethiopia and Kenya, and in Zimbabwe (Figure 2.6a). The average population density in the savannah and open shrublands is around 30 person per square kilometre. In the drier parts of the rangelands only 10 persons per square kilometre were recorded. A closer look reveals the population being concentrated close to urban centres, towns and cities.The change over the 40 years from 1975 to 2015 shows an increase in the population, and most growth in the wetter regions of the rangeland and also close to agricultural and urban areas and rural centres (Figure 2.6b). As far as analysis of the data allows (given their limited accuracy and availability) the population has been growing, in general, all over the rangelands, with some decreases in specific locations. Over the last 50 years SSA's population has more than tripled (Tabutin and Schoumaker 2004).In SSA, many rangeland areas unsurprisingly, lag behind in terms of development and provision of basic services A recent study by Schmocker et al. (2015) carried out an analysis of mean and extreme rainfall in Mount Kenya region in Kenya using a unique dataset, combining both the measurements from private raingauges and several governmental agencies such as the former District Ministry, the Kenya Forest Service (KFS), and the Kenyan Meteorological Department (KMD). The study used four climate change indices from ETCCDI. The adopted indices are: total precipitation (PRCTOT), the number of heavy rain days (R10 mm); where rainfall ≥10 mm in a day; maximum of consecutive 5-day precipitation (Rx5day) and the maximum number of consecutive dry days (CDD); days recording <1 mm. The findings of the study showed that R10 mm and intensity of extreme events are increasing, especially in the October-December (OND) rain season. It was also noted that CDD was on the increase (Ongoma et al. 2018).Change of aridity 2011-2040Figure 2.5: Change of aridity index in Africa (2011Africa ( -2040)). Data source: WAD 2018.in SSA; shea butter from the tree Vitellaria paradoxa is a another example of an NLRP with international, commercial prominence. Aloes -native to semi-arid areas all over Africa -provide the basis for cosmetics.Because of the underlying climatic variability, rainfed crop production is problematic within the rangelands. Rangeland users, despite some having relatively diversified income earning strategies, are basically reliant on livestock and wildlife for their livelihoods. There is a very long history of livestock keeping within the African rangelands, primarily through pastoralism, which has been practiced across the continent for thousands of years. Livestock in SSA rangelands include mainly cattle (with its many breeds), sheep, goats, and a smaller number of camels and donkeys: numbers and distribution vary considerably and accurate data are difficult to attain.Using the most recent and reliable source, maps of densities for cattle, sheep and goats have been produced (Figure 2.7) -bearing in mind that accuracy differs for the various regions and countries. Nevertheless, the available information for the different zones in the rangelands of SSA has been analysed. The total livestock number in SSA can be approximated to 138 million cattle, 123 million head of sheep and 144 million head of goats (Wint and Robinson 2007).Looking at the distribution of cattle, sheep and goats and their density in SSA, this shows that the highest numbers are reported in the rangeland crescent that curves around Central Africa, with the largest concentration in the middle; neither at the driest nor at the wettest fringes (Figure 2.7). This confirms the central role of rangelands for production of livestock in SSA. Densities of the three main species of livestock in the rangelands vary greatly, but in many locations cattle numbers are similar to, or greater than, goats or sheep. There are some regional differences that need to be Population count 2015 Population dynamics 1975-2015 highlighted, however these are often difficult to explain.In the western part of the Sahel, sheep extend the furthest north to the sparse grasslands along dry river valleys, especially in Mali, Mauritania and Niger. Cattle densities are highest in Burkina Faso in woodlands and savannah, and in the contact zone with crop land. It is remarkable to note the sharp difference between Chad with very low livestock densities especially sheep and goats, and Sudan and South Sudan with medium to high densities. Due to conflicts and theft many herds from Chad are moved more south crossing the border. Southern Somalia has mainly cattle, while the northern part around the Horn and the lowlands, southwest of Ethiopia, have high sheep densities, and patchy goat distribution. Combining all three livestock species, the dry lowlands of Kenya have the highest density compared to neighbouring countries. The boundary with Tanzania is distinct in terms of sheep and goats densities, less so for cattle. In Southern Africa, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia generally have low livestock densities. Cattle densities in Southern Africa are high in Zimbabwe and the eastern regions of South Africa, including Swaziland and Lesotho, and south western areas of Angola. Sheep are mostly found in the southern and eastern parts of South Africa and Lesotho. Goats are concentrated along the south eastern part of Southern Africa with the highest densities in Lesotho and Swaziland. In some areas, camels and donkeys are also important -though their number is small and the distribution is very variable over SSA.Camels deserve special attention, as they are specifically adapted to dryland conditions being browsers, feeding mainly on bushes and trees. Thus they do not add to pressure to the grasslands -and can complement herds of grazing According to FAO and IRLI, the SSA rangelands can be subdivided into different ruminant livestock production systems (Robinson et al. 2011). Figure 2.8 shows that rangelands in SSA mainly consist of two main production groups -one where ruminant livestock (cattle, sheep and goats) play the dominant role, and one where livestock and cropping play closely interactive roles. These two larger groups are mainly:• The 'livestock only' group, in areas ranging from hyper arid to arid, humid and temperate-tropical highland areas.• The 'mixed-rainfed' group, also located in hyper arid, arid, humid and in temperate-tropical highland areas.Mixed rainfed production systems are characterised by a combination of rainfed agriculture and livestock in an integrated and complementary way: livestock benefit through feeding on crop residues (straw, harvested by-products and weeds) and in turn produce dung and urine (used as fertilizer for crops) and provide draught power (to pull ploughs and carts). These systems are only possible in areas with climatic conditions that make crop farming feasible.In 'livestock only' production systems, there is not enough production from cropping to make any significant contribution to the diet of the ruminant livestock -apart from small seasonal supplements. Thus the livestock -cattle, sheep and/or goats -need to be mobile to access forage and secure sufficient dry matter intake. The less reliable the forage supply, the more mobile the herds need to be.Over the course of the year, in livestock-only systems, the animals move away from areas of settled cropping in the wet season, but back towards these zones when it becomes drier. Thus they reciprocate between the rangelands and the mixed zones (see arrows in Figure 2.8). During dry cycles, livestock move into the wetter areas close to the mixed rainfed production systems. Then, during wet periods, livestock move out of these zones into the drier rangelands where vegetation has recovered. These north-south seasonal migrations are characteristic of the 'livestock only' systems in West Africa. Mobility of livestock is the key tool to enable this dynamic to function. A similar dynamic is at work in the SSA highlands: in the Horn and East Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda) and Southern Africa (Lesotho and Swaziland).herbivores to better utilise the available vegetation. Furthermore, analysis of the rangelands shows that they have a substantial tree and bush cover, which in most areas is stable or increasing (see Figure 2.1). Thus this is a large fodder resource for browsing livestock and wildlife.The Horn of Africa has the largest concentration of camel herds in the world, with Somalia estimated to have the highest population globally. Large camel populations are found in the eastern lowlands of Ethiopia, northern, western, and north-eastern Kenya, and in most parts of Somalia. According to FAO, Somalia had seven million camels in 2008, while Ethiopia and Kenya had about 2.4 and 0.95 million camels in 2009, respectively (Catley et al. 2013).While some management systems largely depend on a single type of livestock, in most areas land users combine several species. This mimics the natural ecological coexistence of multiple types of herbivores, enabling them to exploit different niches and to use resources efficiently. Furthermore, some livestock keepers split their herds, keeping some animals close to the homesteads (often those producing milk, and younger livestock) while others exploit pastures far away. It is also common practice to lend animals to other herders, to reduce risks.While casual observers may perceive goats as being the root cause of degradation because they are a threat for the rejuvenation of shrubs and trees, the real threat for the grass cover are actually sheep. Unlike cows, they can graze pastures area-wide down to the soil surface, a major threat for the regeneration of the grass cover (see Figure 2.12).Although rangelands consist primarily of indigenous vegetation, landscapes may be natural (edaphic) or man-made (anthropic). They are untilled -apart from pockets of cropping practised by agropastoralists -and influenced most by the actions of herbivores; wild and domesticated. The varying degrees of human interference mainly through livestock management, fencing-off wildlife and deliberate use of fire, has transformed large rangeland areas away from their natural state into semi-natural environments, or into environments characterised by high levels of human interference which has modified the composition and densities of trees, grasses and herbivores. Southern Africa: Angola, Botswana, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe.In much of SSA, grazing lands and use of rangeland resources, water resources and forage resources have historically been governed under traditional common property regimes. These have been guided by indigenous institutions -through traditional groups of elders -which set rules and regulations in respect to use of resources and control of livestock. While it is popularly thought that most rangelands have slipped into an open access, free-for-all 'tragedy of the commons' situation, many continue to be governed to one extent or another by local institutions. Traditional management systems enabled rangeland users to pool and reduce the temporal and spatial risks associated with the climatic variability of the rangeland, in particular spatially and temporally heterogeneous and variable forage production (Bationo et al. 2015). Because of the long history of pastoralism and rangeland management in SSA, land and water use rights in rangelands are complex and are often a result of traditional practices. However, traditional land management practices on rangelands in many SSA countries are increasingly running up against modern law, especially as a result of the increasing demand for alternative use of the rangelands. The challenges which traditional land tenure systems in many SSA countries face require not only better understanding about, but also adaptation of, traditional systems.In terms of the future of rangelands, the mixed rainfed systems and their fringes play a key role. They provide the basis for intensification of livestock production -in combination with cropping -which, if better developed and expanded can reduce the pressure on the core rangelands. However, this intensification may also reduce areas available for pastoralists and my reduce mobility.Extensive grazing land in Africa is concentrated in the semiarid environments for several reasons: (i) crop production in these regions is limited by rainfall, thus reducing to some degree competing demands for land, (ii) forage production in the arid and semi-arid regions, although less in terms of biomass, is generally much better in terms of nutritional value compared to forage from the mesic savannahs and humid zones, and (iii) most ruminants suffer increasing disease incidence in more humid regions, reducing their utility for meat and milk production (Milne and Williams 2015).It has been argued that land-grabbing displaces local communities and small farmers to replace them with large-scale agriculture and that this will ultimately increase, instead of diminishing, food insecurity in the \"global south\", while further deteriorating the environment and causing both livelihood impoverishment and biodiversity loss.The Sub-Saharan rangelands seem to be loaded with fuel for hidden and open conflicts. Such conflicts have been concentrated in the rangeland crescent, particularly in the regions across West and East Africa: currently mainly in Mali, Nigeria and South Sudan. The highest intensity involves \"remote violence\" (e.g. bombings and explosions) and open battles (Figure 2.10).In recent years, the formalisation of property rights has allowed for small-scale and large-scale land acquisition often nicknamed \"land grabbing\" (Figure 2.9, Box 2.2). Africa remains by far the most targeted continent accounting for 42% of all global agricultural deals (422 concluded) and 37% of the area (almost 10 million hectares) (Nolte et al. 2016).The map shows a concentration of land acquisitions in West and East Africa. It highlights the patterns of concentration of land deals within countries. This gives an indication of the factors that may influence the choice of location for a land deal. For example, the area along the River Nile is visible, indicating that in a dry area, agricultural land deals are concentrated where water is available. This effect can also be observed in northern Senegal, where a large number of land deals have been completed along the Senegal River, and in Mali along the River Niger. The countries targeted are those with a high Global Hunger Index, those where the agricultural sector is a particularly important part of the economy, and those where tenure security is weak. The land targeted by such deals in Africa were formerly used as smallholder agriculture (36%), forestry (29%), commercial large-scale agriculture (23%), conservation (7%) and pastoralism (5%) (Nolte et al. 2016).Large-scale acquisition of land for agricultural and forest products by foreign investors has increased since the 2007-2008 world food price crisis, which prompted a renewed interest in foreign lands as a means to achieve food security, and as a financial investment. The governments, agribusinesses and investors that have bought or leased these lands are using them for the cultivation of food crops that are then exported, and for the production of cash crops and biofuels 6 .Land deals Africa Loliondo is very close to the world-renowned Serengeti National Park in Tanzania. The struggle over land access has simmered for almost 20 year because of the government's leasing of land to a foreign hunting company. That company claims exclusive access rights to the allocated area. In 2009, the Government of Tanzania evicted several hundred Maasai households from the area. A study by the International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA), a Danish NGO working with local communities, estimated that 185 homes were burned in an act of forced eviction, leaving thousands homeless and their livestock scattered.The Government argued that it held the ultimate authority, and that the rights to the land, claimed by the Maasai, were nowhere documented. Furthermore, it was asserted, the sheer numbers of animals kept by Maasai constituted an environmental threat. International media coverage was intense at the time and the heat of the arguments has simmered on -with no sustainable solutions found to-date.The latest developments are that on 21th September this year -2018 -residents from four villages in Loliondo have filed a case with the East African Court of Justice in an attempt to stop further evictions. At the heart of the matter are questions about the Government's rights to attract investors and allocate land -and the concern of the Government about the future of pastoral livestock production.https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/oct/16/landmeans-life-tanzania-maasai-fear-existence-under-threat Loliondo Division of Ngorongoro District, Arusha Region (https://www. iwgia.org/en/tanzania/2502-tanzania-forced-evictions-of-maasai-peoplein-loliondo)While rangelands may be dominated by livestock, they also include areas exclusively inhabited by wildlife, or areas that contain a mix of wildlife and livestock. Rangelands represent some of the most important areas of biodiversity globally. In East and Southern Africa especially there exist large areas inhabited by very high concentrations of wildlife including the large herbivores -elephant, rhino, buffalo, giraffe and zebra, and carnivores -lion, leopard and cheetah, sometimes termed 'charismatic megafauna'. Figure 2.11 shows the highest species richness in the rangeland crescent with a concentration in East and Southern Africa.But it is not only the megafauna, it is also the unique landscapes, the vast savannahs stretching to distant mountains, the rivers and patches of wetlands, that fascinates and touches those who have the opportunity to visit and experience these ecosystems. These areas are of vital importance in terms of biodiversity, but simultaneously in terms of economic value for their countries. This has led to largeThe World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development (WB 2011) gives an insight into the theory of conflict drivers, which illustrates security, economic, and political stresses, and is particularly relevant to the Sahel. Table 2.2 summarizes the main types of conflicts, their key defining factors, causes/ drivers, and consequences.There are a number of conflicts related to rangelands which include those fuelled by ethnic mistrust, dwindling natural resources, poor land management, population growth, insecurity and banditry. Any kind of conflict, irrespective of the reasons, poses multiple threats and constraints to rangeland management and food security -while further limiting the pursuit for progress and development. Conflicts can have different origin and reasons:• Geo-political interests can contribute to conflicts over borders, access to resources like water and grazing lands, to strategic places such as the sea (e.g. in East Africa conflict between Sudan and South Sudan over land access in Abyei administrative area; FAO 2018).• Insecurity: National governments' neglect of marginalized areas, in which rangelands are generally found, has sometimes resulted in the absence of a security framework and basic services, creating a power vacuum that has in some cases been filled by armed groups. An increasing recent proliferation of arms in pastoral communities 7 has escalated cattle rustling -which previously served specific purposes of restocking or cultural rituals amongst the Turkana and Karamoja 8 -into open conflict.• Environment and natural resource scarcity due to desertification and droughts is creating land and water shortages that continues to exacerbate conflicts 9 . In the Sahel, recent reports show that as droughts become more frequent, pastoralists are not staying within traditional transhumance routes, thus leading to conflicts with settled farmers. Symbiotic relationships that existed between pastoralists and farmers, such as exchanging manure for crop residues, has weakened and has also been a cause of conflict in the Sahel as farmers start keeping livestock and some pastoralists embark on crop farming.• Conflicts related to land rights, privatization of land and population increases can also contribute to conflict.Conflict can interfere with traditional mobility routes leading to land degradation during the dry season. In the Horn of Africa, armed groups such as Al-Shabaab, restricted movements of people and livestock during the 2009-2010 droughts leading to degradation of resources, loss of lives and property 10 . Can upscale to broader conflicts.Criminal activities.Level of risk and attractiveness of payments, social status.Poverty and inferior perspective of other sectors.Destabilize social cohesion in pastoral societies, upset management.Rebellion and irredentism. Strength of social cohesion in group, hierarchial structure.Neglect or repression by central authorities, combination of localized alliances and grievances.Disruption of central services (for example animal disease control), interruption of migratory husbandry practices by other groups.Religious extremism. Weakness of social cohesion, degree of infiltration of other extremist group.Lack of livelihood prospects for future. Destruction of social services, accelerated trends in criminal activities. Political conflicts parts of the SSA rangelands being designated as protected areas, for the preservation of wildlife and for tourism. The density and the size of the protected areas has increased in the rangeland crescent of SSA. Analysis shows that 17.4% of the rangeland area is currently under some state of protection, compared to 13.2% of protected land outside the rangelands. The percentage of protection is lower in the grasslands and shrublands -the drier parts of the rangelands, where it is around 10%, and the highest in the woodland and savannah -the wetter parts of the rangelands, reaching almost 20%. Adding up all protected areas in woodlands and savannahs shows that they host more than three quarters (78%) -and the savannah alone more than half (52%) -of all protected areas of the rangelands in SSA.Figure 2.11 illustrates the wildlife and associated with it the biodiversity richness of the SSA rangeland crescent. The 'charismatic megafauna' species are clearly more abundant in East and Southern Africa, while the Sahel has less extended areas, and for some of these species only pockets remain (e.g. elephant, lion, cheetah) and some have almost disappeared (e.g. zebra).Despite some conservation gains, overall biodiversity is declining and human-wildlife conflict is increasing. Recognizing that wildlife require far more space than the protected areas offer, and that most biodiversity resides in human-modified landscapes, conservation efforts are turning to rural landscapes where people directly manage the land. Biodiversity conservation in these areas hinges on landowners accommodating wildlife, and resolving the human-wildlife conflict that undermines their willingness to conserve. Recent studies have led to a conclusions that \"devolving the rights and responsibilities for biodiversity conservation from national to local levels calls for reviving the incentives and skills for making wildlife an important component of livelihoods, based on maximizing the ben-efits and minimizing the costs and conflicts. Paradoxically, such devolution draws the focus of conservation back to the skills and methods of coexistence traditionally residing in communities which is not available to, or considered by, national agencies and NGOs\" (Western et al. 2015).Wildlife may offer opportunities for supplementary -or even main -income generation and may provide an alternative to livestock production. But for rangeland users, competition between wildlife and livestock can pose a set of challenges: ecological and economic amongst others. It is in East and Southern Africa that most livestock-wildlife interaction occurs.A rich diversity of wildlife is found both in protected areas and outside. The interaction 'issue' between livestock and wildlife is concentrated outside the protected areas. The type of this interaction is now altering due to a changing landscape, with more competition for resources (water, pasture and migration routes) leading to increased contact between wildlife and livestock (Osofsky et al. 2005). The underlying problem is the decline in wildlife habitats. The impact of this can be increased wildlife-livestock-human conflicts arising from damage caused by livestock, humans and wildlife to each other (African Union 2015). Despite the importance of this interaction for the economic and environmental futures of the region, there has been little scientific progress in understanding the nature of livestock-wildlife competition in pastoral landscapes. However, grazing by different ungulate species on the same \"patch\" may not effectively be sharing the same resource. Contrary to popular impressions, the presence or absence of dietary or habitat overlap is insufficient to claim competition between livestock or wildlife. Such thinking not only leads to over-estimations of competition, but also leads to land-use decisions that exclude grazing wildlife from pasturelands or livestock from protected areas -decisions that will increase the vulnerability of the whole wildlife-livestock-grassland system (Butt and Turner 2012).One standard practice in livestock production on rangelands, espoused by commercial ranchers and subsistence pastoralists alike, is the eradication of large, indigenous herbivores that are believed to compete with livestock for food. These eradication efforts have increasingly problematic implications for biodiversity conservation. In an East African savannah renowned for its large herbivore diversity, it was revealed that cattle do indeed compete with herbivores such as zebras and gazelles during the dry season, when food quantity is low. In contrast, during the wet season, when food quantity is high, grazing by wildlife actually benefits cattle by improving the quality of forage. These findings highlight ecological processes that support the promotion of coexistence among large herbivores in grasslands and savannahs, and hence could be useful for conservation (du Toit 2011). Additionally, as rangelands undergo irreversible changes caused by invasions of undesirable plant species and \"climate forcing\", the future perspective favours a proactive shift in attitude towards the livestock-wildlife interface, from problem control to asset management (du Toit et al. 2017) (Figure 2.12).Competition between wildlife and livestock is hard to quantify, and the evidence for the magnitude and type of competition is weak (Prins 2000and Young et al. 2005in Niamir-Fuller et al. 2012).Fire has always been part of rangelands whether natural (through lightning strikes) or ignited by humans. Thus, fire is an important ecological phenomenon in rangelands. Burning has, over millennia, shaped the species composition and structure of flora in rangelands, and has helped to create and maintain a mosaic of vegetation. Fire alters the balance between woody and herbaceous plants across the landscape, tending to reduce the prevalence of woody vegetation and increase the occurrence of herbaceous cover -and thus forage availability. The distribution of reoccurring fires shows that the areas most affected are situated around the Congo Basin, from the wetter woodland areas to the savannah and shrublands and the north (Figure 2.13a). Fire incidence is high also in the whole of the Sudano-Sahelian zone, the entire northern and eastern part of Southern Africa, inclusive of Madagascar. Savannah zones are generally subjected to the most fires: only along the driest northern fringe of the grasslands with their sparse cover are fires less common. The Horn of Africa and Kenya are the least affected. This could indicate heavy grazing and removal of the grass biomass, reducing the amount potential fuel and creating a patchwork of grass cover -meaning fires are less likely to catch or spread. In well-conserved areas like in the Serengeti National Park in Tanzania and the W-Arly-Pendjari Biosphere Reserve in West Africa, enough fuel builds up and fires are more frequent than in the surrounding areas. Reduced fire frequencies can have negative consequences, especially increased encroachment of woody plants, which suppress grazing species. The impact of fires on productivity and habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity, and the use of fire in the management is further discussed in Chapter 3.1.3).In the World Atlas of Desertification (WAD 2018), five major global fire regimes, are distinguished in terms of their size, frequency and intensity (Figure 2.13b). Frequent Intense Large (FIL) and Frequent Cool Small (FCS) fires occur largely in grassy systems. Rare Intense Large (RIL) fires, where an entire forest canopy can burn with a very high intensity, means that the forest takes considerable time to regenerate. Rare Cool Small (RCS) fires occur where conditions are not often flammable: this is the case on the fringe of dryland and deserts.Intermediate Cool Small (ICS) fires are also found in wetter Figure 2.12: Foraging habits of giraffe (left) and camels (centre) in northern Kenya: studies show that there is little competition as they use different feeding heights (O'Conner et al. 2015). Cows graze the grass and herbaceous layer up to a few centimetres and sheep to a few millimetres above the soil surface (right) (Hanspeter Liniger). The different grazing heights of wild or domestic animals have implications on the recovery of the vegetation and the soil cover especially after heavy grazing.parts of the world, but are closely associated with people, who tend to increase fire frequency. Switches from one fire regime to another are often associated with degradation of the ecosystem, because organisms (notably vegetation) are adapted to particular fire regimes (Archibald et al. 2013).Land degradation in the Sub-Saharan rangelands is omnipresent (Box 2.3). The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment found that degradation was actually worse in semi-arid and subhumid areas -due to population pressure, overuse of the vegetation and thus expose of denuded soil to erosion by wind and water -whereas arid areas were not so degraded.One of the ways of assessing land degradation is to analyse land productivity change over previous decades. Decreasing land productivity occurs in 22% of African rangeland (WAD 2018). Satellite image analysis permits the interpretation of the greenness of the land and the vegetation biomass -and the monitoring of any change. Severe declines have been mostly recorded at the drier fringe of the rangeland crescent: in Southern Africa, especially in the central part (e.g. Botswana); along the south-eastern coast; in the southwest of Madagascar; in East Africa, especially Kenya and Tanzania; in the Horn of Africa, notably the north-western part of Ethiopia; South Sudan; and smaller pockets distributed over the drier Sahelian zone of West Africa. The regions becoming greener and increasing in productivity are mostly located along the wetter fringe of the rangelands: that is the woodland to savannah zone (Figure 2.14).The scale of land degradation -and potential solutionshave been hotly debated for more than 100 years. And the debate continues intensely. This is partly due to lack of agreement on what constitutes land degradation and its spatial extension, coupled with lack of rangeland monitor- Fire regime ing, although this is changing. According to the African Union (2012) 75% of Africa's drylands, most of which are rangelands, are considered affected by desertification. The extent and degree of land degradation remains unclear, even after the launch of the World Atlas of Desertification in 2018 (WAD 2018). The atlas does not provide an updated version of previous global desertification and land degradation maps. It presents an assessment and maps on \"global change issues\", which have been identified to play key roles in desertification and land degradation. In total 14 issues were analysed, including decreasing land productivity, reoccurrence of fires, change in aridity, population density and change, and livestock density (Figure 2.15a). The more overlap of the issues in the same area, the higher the probability of land degradation/ desertification: this is termed \"convergence of evidence\". Figure 2.15b shows that the highest number of global change issues are found in parts of Senegal, Sudan, South Sudan, Somaliland, Mozambique, southwest Madagascar and Botswana.The most common problematic issues in these areas are aridity, population change, income level, population density, livestock density, fire and decrease of land productivity (Figure 2.15a). Interestingly, at the northern fringe of the rangeland in the Sahel, in north-western Kenya, in south-eastern Ethiopia to northern parts of Somalia in the In the FAO/ LADA project land degradation is defined as a change in the land's health resulting in a diminished capacity of the ecosystem to provide goods and services for its beneficiaries (Bunning et al. 2011).Desertification is land degradation in dryland areas. Frequency of fire soil erosion modelling results do not show a severe problem on rangelands, soil erosion has been reported one of the main degradation types under the cases analysed in this book. It must be noted that land relief has a strong influence on erosion and its modelling. However, vegetation cover is the main determinant in soil degradation through erosion. Steep slopes with dense cover do not have erosion problems, while gentle slopes with sparse/ practically no grass cover -at least at the start of the rainy season -are common in rangelands and these do experience high local rates of degradation. As most of the soil erosion is caused by water runoff, this indicates another major issue: loss of soil moisture and groundwater and change of surface water availability.Sand and dust storms occur when wind mobilises exposed, loose soil (Figure 2.17). These conditions are common in semi-arid and arid regions. Sandstorms typically occur relatively close to the ground surface, but fine dust particles may be lifted high into the atmosphere (several kilometres) where strong winds can transport them vast distances across oceans and continents (WAD 2018). Most dust storms in the Sahara and Kalahari deserts are natural phenomena.Although anthropogenic sources currently constitute only 25% of global dust emissions, the potential for increasing this is great. In SSA, the areas mostly affected by humaninduced sand and dust storms are along the driest zone of the Sahel from Lake Chad to Niamey, in southern Mali and Mauritania, southwest Madagascar and the Northern Cape of South Africa. Dried-up water surfaces (e.g. Lake Chad) pose a corresponding increased risk of sand and dust storms. This drying is due to water withdrawals and/or changed land use with reduced vegetation cover because of unsustainable land use and land degradation, especially in arid and semi-arid areas. This may be exacerbated by prolonged droughts and increased fire occurrences.Horn of Africa, and in the western regions of South Africa, Botswana and Namibia, the green colours indicate only a few of the issues mentioned above (Figure 2.15b). Some of the \"global change issues\" leading to land degradation and that were found to be prominent in SSA were soil erosion by water and wind, as well as a change (decrease) in surface water.The map in Figure 2.16 illustrates rates of soil erosion by water divided into seven classes according to the European Soil Bureau classification. The colour gradation from green, with a low and acceptable annual soil loss of less than one tonne per hectare, to red with a severe annual loss of over 50 tonnes per hectare, indicates the intensity of the predicted erosion rates (Borelli et al. 2017). Within SSA the areas most affected are characterized by sloping land and crop production systems. Even though, at the continental scale, 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Chapter 2 Sub-Saharan Africa rangelands defined Surface water change in rivers and lakes is crucial because this constitutes the most accessible form of water for people and animals. Figure 2.18 illustrates the loss of permanent and seasonal surface water (red and pink) in Africa, and the new permanent and annual water (dark green and light green). Major rivers in the eastern part of Africa, and also in South Sudan, appear to be decreasing in flow, changing from permanent to seasonal flow -or even disappearing altogether in the dry lowlands. This provides a major challenge to rangeland communities and their livestock, as they depend closely on these permanent or seasonal rivers. In the West African Sahel, there is evidence of increase rather than decrease in surface water -due to greater occurrence of flooding.In Sub-Saharan Africa, there have been changes in surface water (river water and lakes) but they do not conform to a simple pattern (Figure 2.18). These changes may be the result of three factors, separately or combined: (i) climate change -that is altered rainfall within the watersheds leading to more, or less, surface water. However, there is little evidence that this is the main cause; (ii) direct water abstractions and water use, mostly for irrigation purposes along the rivers, diminishing river flows and water availability downstream. This is a major reason for change in larger watersheds, where the rivers originate in wetter areas (especially mountains) and flow into increasingly dry lowlands. Examples are the Tana River in Kenya, the Juba River in Somalia, and the Senegal River, where the upper stretches show increasing water surfaces (due to irrigation) while the lower reaches of the river are drying up. High and increasing rates of water withdrawal by crop producers in the drylands are resulting in decreasing surface water and reduced river flow in the lowlands and their rangelands; (iii) when rangelands are overused and the vegetation cover is reduced, higher rates of surface runoff occur, less water infiltrates into the soil and more erratic river flows result, with more incidences of flooding demonstrated by seasonal surface water -as in West Africa. The very variable pattern of changes means that in some locations surface water is disappearing, while in others it is emerging: this seems to be the result of the high variability in water abstractions and in runoff, which in turn mainly reflect complex land use changes within the watersheds (Aeschbacher et al. 2005, Liniger et al. 2005, Notter et al. 2007). At the local level, surface water availability and its seasonal, as well as longterm, change is key to the management of the rangelands. These rivers are the lifeblood of the drylands; their flow is crucial for people, livestock, wildlife and ecosystems along the rivers and in wetlands. Large-scale dam projects for irrigation of hydropower generation, mass abstraction of water for irrigation combined with land use change affecting surface runoff and climate change -all these combined have a profound effect on river flow, including peak flows and floods as well as base flows during the dry season when water is most precious.The rangeland characterisation of West, the Horn and East, and Southern Africa shown in Table 2.1 and 2.3 is general and not definitive. It is a broad categorisation that is also dynamic because the degree of human interference, either directly (e.g. through gradually changing land use) or indirectly (e.g. climate change) has a continuous impact. Thus, what were once pastoral rangelands may now be being converted (in part) into game hunting areas, seasonal cropping is sometimes turning into permanent systems, and large-scale commercial plantations are emerging. Figure 2.17: Dust emissions in Africa and causes: mainly natural (blue) or anthropogenic (red). Source: WAD 2018.2.2 Why are rangelands in SSA important?Rangelands cover a significant part of Sub-Saharan Africa's land area (62%) and host a significant proportion of the African population (38%) and livestock (56%). With current demographic trends, rangelands and all drylands in general will continue to experience increasing population and settlements as growth demands more space -and that is most clearly available in the drylands. In addition, rangelands represent diverse ecosystems, natural resources, people/ societies and multiple uses and functions and are therefore vital for the ecological, environmental, economic and social functions they play. Rangelands support life for those living within them, and also for those living outside. Key economic activities supported by rangelands include livestock production, wildlife conservation and related activities -and to a lesser extent crop farming, mining, production of cosmetics and handicrafts. For many countries with high proportions of savannah-based rangelands, especially in East and Southern Africa, wildlife tourism ranks amongst their top income generators. Kenya, for example, received 1.5 million tourists in 2017, contributing to 9.7% of total GDP and 3.4% of total employment (WTTC 2018).Rangelands occupy a strategic position at the centre of the zones in SSA where some of the most pressing challenges for human development and security are being played out. When there are problems in the marginal border territories of the Sub-Saharan rangelands -such as droughts, breakdown of markets, insecurity, conflicts -all of these create major set-backs to development. Over the past decades, many of the responses from national and international agencies have been ineffective in securing food security, peace and improvements in the livelihoods of people. This is largely because they have ignored or not sufficiently used the potential for positive roles to be played by the range- Africa (1984Africa ( -1999Africa ( to 2000Africa ( -2015)). Data source: WAD 2018.In much of SSA, grazing lands and use of rangeland resources, water resources and forage resources have historically been governed under traditional common property regimes.It has been argued that land-grabbing displaces local communities to replace them with large-scale agriculture that will ultimately increase food insecurity.Despite some conservation gains, overall biodiversity is declining and humanwildlife conflict is increasing.Conservation efforts are turning to landscapes where people directly manage the land. Biodiversity conservation in these areas hinges on landowners accommodating wildlife.Contrary to popular impressions, the presence or absence of dietary or habitat overlap is insufficient to claim competition between livestock or wildlife.Fire has helped to create and maintain a mosaic of vegetation.The MEA found that degradation was worse in semi-arid and sub-humid areas -due to population pressure and overuse of the vegetation -while arid areas were not so degraded.According to the African Union (2012) 75% of Africa's drylands, most of which are rangelands, are considered affected by desertification.Gentle slopes with sparse/ practically no grass cover -at least at the start of the rainy season -are common in rangelands and experience soil erosion.Major rivers in the eastern part of Africa, and also in South Sudan, appear to be decreasing, with flow changing from permanent to seasonal.High rates of water withdrawal by crop producers are resulting in decreasing surface water and reduced river flow in the lowlands and their rangelands.Reduced vegetation cover leads to higher rates of surface runoff and more incidences of flood.Rivers are the lifeblood of the drylands; their flow is crucial for people, livestock, wildlife and ecosystems. • Most deals in Southern part of the Sahel (Senegal)• Almost the whole region of Ethiopia and Sudan, has a high number of land deals.• Zambia and the west coast countries and Madagascar have high concentrations• Not very common • Famous are:-W-Arly-Pendjari -Giraffe conservancy • Lower area coverage than in East and Southern Africa• Natural reserves, parks, private and communal conservancies • High numbers of various sizes • Famous parks include: Serengeti, Maasai Mara, Amboseli, Tsavo• Large-scale parks and reserves.• In the northern part of Southern Africa • Famous parks are: Krüger, Moremi, Chobe, Etosha, Selous, Luangwa• Medium prominence in the Sahel. High in Chad• High to medium numbers of fire incidence, especially south Sudan, west Ethiopia• Mostly high incidence in the northern part (woodland zone and savannah)Convergence of global change issues (as a proxy of land degradation)• Medium to high number of coinciding GCIs (in the whole Sahel except the northern fringe)• Medium number of coinciding GCIs • Low to medium in the southwest and medium to high in Botswana and southwest of Madagascar Table 2.3: Characteristics of Sub-Saharan rangelands according to regions: additional key characteristics for countries in regions land people themselves -the inhabitants of these regions. Yet, these are the very people who know these critical areas best, because they live in and depend on them for their livelihoods.More recently, there has been a growing realisation that engaging positively with the rangeland societies and institutions can help to unlock the knowledge and potential of the populations of these areas. The local institutions and actors can then be enabled to play their natural roles in surveillance of the landscape and their natural and human resources, securing and managing the vastness of their rangelands and regulating the flows of people and commodities that traverse them.Normalizing relations between communities and neighbour states is recognized as one of the greatest development challenges in the rangelands across the region 11 . There are many shared challenges in these inter-country border zones where droughts are frequent and often devastating to livestock and people. In the direst situations, emergency food-relief camps are established: and while lives are saved, these settlements may leave psychological and environmental scars that take decades to heal. Sustainable rangeland management practices and approaches enable communities to respond to these challenges, working together to conserve and share scarce pasture and water to the benefit of all -building relations, reducing clashes, rebuilding contemporary institutions and securing the foundations of forward-looking devolved government in African states.Rangelands have been dismissed and devalued as degenerate and degraded spaces and societies where insecurity is perennial. Numerous governments in Sub-Saharan Africa continue looking at rangelands through narrow 'economicproductive' functions/ perspectives and reason that the production potential of rangelands is inferior to the highpotential croplands. The various massive economic, environmental and socio-cultural functions that rangelands fulfil include many that are unperceived and do not have a marketable price -and are therefore often insufficiently included in development plans.Several recent developments are influencing the potential value of rangelands and the perception of actors towards rangelands:1. Growing recognition of the economic value of livestock production that has often escaped national statistical services, due to subsistence economies and informal or illegal cross-border trades (King-Okumu et al. 2015).2. Increasing importance of the value of tourism enterprises based in the rangelands: this give them special importance.3. Better understanding of the economic value of non-marketed services provided by the rangeland environment.It is only since the concept of 'ecosystem services' gained international prominence at the turn of the century that rangelands are looked at from an 'environmental service' and 'cultural values' angle. They are thus beginning to be reassessed for their importance in providing a wide range of ecosystem services, although this is not yet sufficiently recognized and appreciated (Davies et al. 2015). This includes the intrinsic value of biodiversity and marketing of carbon.Multiple claims from land use change and/or intensified agricultural and animal production, setting aside rangeland areas for nature conservation as well as for carbon sequestration, large land acquisitions for investment of various kinds, mining of minerals, oil and water resources as well as controversial and competing policy directions are likely to lead to an increase in the vulnerability of ecosystems and livelihoods and dubious development strategies. Increasingly Sub-Saharan rangelands are not \"marginal lands\" any longer as they have been termed for decades in the past. Rangelands have become objects of interest for survival, for livelihoods, for investments, and for climate change mitigation (Box 2.4).Rangelands in Sub-Saharan Africa have been perceived as a problem for over a century. These areas have been talked about as being inhospitable, fragile and on a one-way path to inevitable degradation. To many observers, rangelands used by pastoralists under common property regimes present a perfect example of the \"tragedy of the commons\": free-for-all grazing triggering a downward spiral towards desertification. Various remedies have been suggested. Often these followed ranching models. But failures in rangeland development projects have been commonplace.As a result range ecology and processes were re-examined, and in the 1980s a new thinking emerged. This embraced the concept of enhancing livestock movement and respecting traditional knowledge and \"opportunism\". But little seems to have been translated into action -and new challenges have emerged, notably increasing population pressure, livestock-wildlife conflicts, and climate change. New ideas have followed. This section explains these different, evolving and often conflicting, attitudes towards the \"problem\" and the \"solution\".Early 20 th century: Fears, warnings and the \"mainstream view\" It was early in the 20th century that concerns were first voiced about land degradation in Africa's rangelands. The South African Drought Commission, established as a result of the widespread livestock losses of 1919/20, gave dire warnings in its 1923 report about the dangers of overstocking. It predicted \"a newly-created South African desert\" (Beinart 1984). Rangelands in Sub-Saharan Africa indeed constitute vast expanses of drylands prone to drought, livestock mortality and, potentially, desertification. Little wonder then that there have been fears about their future -popular views which have changed remarkably little over the last century. The jargon and narrative has also remained remarkably constant: fragile lands exploitation by pastoralists through overstocking with herds of emaciated cattle and goats, destroying vegetation and exposing the soil to wind and 4. Increasing knowledge of the amount of mineral and energy resources in the rangelands and the possibilities of exploring, exploiting and transporting them. While this may create opportunities for improved livelihoods and the economic status of rangeland users, it also challenges traditional rangeland commmunities and their historical use of the land.As the stakes are growing higher in the rangelands, the controversies about what is or is not \"sustainable rangeland management\" -and how best to achieve it -are growing.The misunderstanding or misapplication of the theories, concepts and paradigms of rangeland management have often in the past provided excuses for external actors to pursue agendas that have marginalized, oppressed and blocked development of societies in the rangelands. There exist various controversial and unresolved issues in the rangeland sector in Sub-Saharan Africa. The competition for land and water, population increase in many African states and pastoralist societies, impacts of land degradation on the rangelands' health exacerbated by climate change, land tenure and land/ water use rights, poverty, security and conflicts are all having a significant influence on defining and implementing sustainable growth in the rangelands.Box 2.4: Sub-Saharan African rangelands at a glance • Rangeland systems spread out in a rangeland crescent spanning from West Africa to the Horn of Africa, East Africa and Southern Africa, positioned largely between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn.• Approximately 25 million pastoralists and 240 million agropas toralists in Sub-Saharan Africa depend on livestock as their primary source of income (AU-IBAR 2012, FAO 2018).• Between 2000 and 2010, production of livestock increased by 3% in SSA (Milne and Williams 2015), a relatively small increase compared to the rising demand driven by an annual human population growth of 2.7%.• Rangelands are currently being lost due to land degradation, conservation projects, to crop and urban land and other factors at an alarming rate (Milne 2016).• Pastoral and agropastoral systems in the Sahel contribute more than 80% of the animal product supply. Pastoralism accounts for 70% to 90% of cattle rearing and 30% to 40% of sheep and goats. Transhumant pastoralism supplies an estimated 65% of beef, 40% of mutton and goat meat, and 70% of milk (ECOWAS 2008).• Animals that have traveled more than 450 miles from southern Somalia to the markets in Nairobi account for 26% of the beef eaten in Kenya and 16% of the beef eaten in Nairobi. Traditional herding in Tanzania is the source of 70% of national milk production, which totalled 770 million literes in 2006 (Grandval 2012).Rangelands occupy a strategic position where some of the most pressing challenges for human development and security are being played out.Rangelands have been dismissed and devalued as degenerate and degraded spaces and societies where insecurity is perennial.Rangelands are beginning to be reassessed for their importance in providing a wide range of ecosystem services.Increasingly Sub-Saharan rangelands are not \"marginal lands\" any longer -as they have been termed for decades in the past.water erosion. A mid-20th century review of rangeland management in East Africa (Heady 1960) confirmed the common position that \"range deterioration has assumed alarming proportions in many areas\". This was referred to by Sandford (1983) as the \"mainstream view\". It saw severe and rapid desertification on the horizon, was distrustful of traditional institutions, and above all perceived the central problem as being overgrazing by too many, mismanaged, and unproductive livestock maintained often as symbols of wealth.Mid-20 th century: Colonial responses by governments and development agencies -seeking equilibrium This \"mainstream view\" therefore held that control of livestock numbers was the key to action. Thus destocking followed by grazing management schemes comprised the central initiative put forward for East Africa. Pratt and Gwynne (1977) in their standard text entitled \"Rangeland Management and Ecology in East Africa\" talked of systems that would restore \"order out of chaos\". Their remedy to the problem of the communal rangelands was to introduce ranchstyle models which would achieve an 'equilibrium' or steady state -in other words an even, steady balance between livestock numbers and vegetation (Mwangi and Ostrom 2009). But stocking rates were not simple to set, and even more difficult to enforce. To create and fence large ranches in landscapes with a diverse mixture of lowlands and hills, areas with swamps and other zones with only wet-season water available proved practically impossible. Furthermore this meant cutting across traditional routes of movement, and age old rights to grazing. Naturally this model could work -but only in those few cases where natural and social conditions permitted it. For example on the wetter fringes of dryland areas where private ownership (whether by individuals or groups) was possible. Some group ranches have proved indeed viable. But they are the exception. Large-scale settlement of nomadic pastoralists, however desirable it seemed to governments, for ecological, developmental and (often) national security reasons, has proved impractical. As Behnke and colleagues observed \"few range management schemes in dry Africa have had a discernible and permanent impact on the way communal rangeland is used\" (Behnke et al. 1993).Late 20 th century: The concept of \"opportunistic management\" -non-equilibrium state The proceeds of a seminal meeting held in 1990 sought to get to the root of the problem. The \"mainstream view\" was held to be flawed (Behnke et al. 1993). The basic misunderstanding, they pointed out, was that the pastoral rangelands didn't act in equilibrium like many agricultural ecosystems; they behaved in an unpredictable way. This means that a strict balance between animal numbers and fodder was simply not possible to maintain, and no fixed carrying capacity could be calculated. Neither were rigid stocking rates applicable. The whole ecology of the drylands is, and always has been, subject to high variability with extremes like droughts and floods -as well as outbreaks of livestock sickness and mortality. Over millennia, pastoralists have learnt to ride these highs and lows, to cope with periods of drought and livestock losses, and most importantly to \"bounce back\" rapidly by rebuilding herds and using their mobility to seek out grazing where vegetation had recovered.While the ecological, social and political systems vary considerably from East to West to Southern Africa, the basic arguments and principles are similar. For instance for West Africa a World Bank publication arrived at the conclusion that to counter desertification pastoralist associations could be an effective new instrument -and very importantly that the users of any new land management system must also be its managers: traditional principles of land rights needed to be recognized (Falloux and Mukendi 1988). In Southern Africa, where the apartheid regimes have grossly distorted land tenure regimes and traditions of communal land use have been eroded, the discourse is even more difficult. This has been compounded by the need to reconcile the often conflicting aims of game tourism and community livestockbased livelihoods, and to seek ways of integrating the two (e.g. Madzudzo 1995).This new approach, termed \"opportunistic management\", began to emerge during the 1980s -which was a watershed decade in sustainable land management with the new emphases on participatory approaches, appreciation of indigenous knowledge and the merging of conservation and production strategies. The aptly titled book \"Living with Uncertainty\" (Scoones 1994) sums up the opportunistic management school of thought. It embraces the principles of recognizing the objectives of pastoralists and their traditional management practices based on flexible and responsive mobility in the face of an ever-changing, nonequilibrium, landscape. There are strong cultural affinities and bonds between these groups, their livestock and the landscape: these must be respected. This is not to say that help and assistance aren't required: but they need to be tailored to acceptance of this reality. Thus marketing infrastructure was held to be vital, as was veterinary support.In terms of management, devolution of decision making to the land users was looked upon as vital.There have been many other theories and ideas regarding rangelands and their development. Most have come and gone, but there is one that has persisted since the early 1980s and continues to be supported by some followers of the founder, Allan Savory: namely 'holistic management' (Savory 1983;2013). The fundamental principle is that a large herd grazed very intensively in one area -then moved on to another -will make better use of vegetation than allowing livestock to graze selectively. Savory holds that, in many ways, the problem is undergrazing rather than overgrazing. Chapter 5 reflects on some of the (mixed) experiences with this system as documented in the case studies in Part II of these guidelines.21 st century: Current realities, new challenges and a broader perspective Moving on to the 2000s this concept of non-equilibrium models and opportunistic management has further evolved into making use of \"heterogeneity\". Owen-Smith (2004), Fryxell et al. (2005), Hopcraft et al. (2010) re-emphasise the fact that transhumance pastoralism is optimally adapted to accessing critical resources in the highly seasonal, unpredictable and extensive landscapes of African savannahs.Despite the new concepts of the 1980s and 1990s, the continued trend in government policies has been to privatize land and sedentarize pastoralists (Homewood 2009, Western et al. 2009b, Lovschal et al. 2017), which fragments key ecological gradients and large landscapes, reduces pastoral mobility and their ability to adapt to seasonal changes in forage resources, which will be further compounded by the effect of climate change. Moreover, sedentarization of pastoralists is destructive to wildlife (Western et al. 2009a, Groom andWestern 2013). The functional heterogeneity concept is also relevant to the management of livestock on ranches, where enabling animals to make decisions facilitates adaptive foraging options. Thus the continued, popular approaches to rangeland management, which are regularly advocated by international development agencies, violate key ecological principles (Fynn et al. 2017).It must be pointed out that the debate continues. The notion of non-equilibrium models has been contested by Illius and O'Connor 1999, who note that animal numbers are indeed in equilibrium -with more reliable key resources in the system that provide critical forage for survival during drier periods -and have the potential to degrade these key resources. This line of argumentation asserts that most rangelands in semi-arid regions clearly can be degraded by excessive livestock numbers, leading to loss of perennial grasses, reduced grass production and soil erosion (Milton et al. 1994, Fynn and O'Connor 2000, Fynn et al. 2017). However, in regard to discussions about the sustainability of pastoralism in relation to demographic growth and ensuing land degradation through overstocking, there is no linear relationship between demographic growth in pastoral populations and growth in the number of livestock. Demographic growth out of step with herd growth is more likely to lead to impoverishment than to land degradation through overstocking -although impoverishment can also lead to overgrazing by reducing mobility (Krätli et al. 2015).Despite predictions, debates and theories about \"new deserts\" foreseen 100 years ago, there is still no consensus about how much land has actually suffered desertification. While there has been continued widespread land degradation in rangeland areas, and it's still a major concern, it has not matched the dire predictions of all those decades ago. Many areas have simply continued to ride the cycles of droughts and then recovery. While in some areas the natural resilience of the drylands and its inhabitants has been largely underestimated, other areas suffered serious land degradation and demand large restoration efforts. In this context it is helpful to make some comments about the changing schools of thought, to set the perspective more broadly, and to bring the debate up to date.First of all, much of the discussion in the concepts discussed above related almost solely to a narrow focus on transhumant pastoralists and their livestock. It also tended to focus strongly on East Africa. But the rangelands cover a much wider constituency. Many of its inhabitants are actually semi-settled, or even settled agropastoralists, who crop small areas of land opportunistically (see Chapter 3.1). After all, the drylands are where water harvesting for crop production has its traditional roots (Critchley et al. 1992). In a broad swathe across Sudan, Uganda, Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia livestock holders also raise some crops -which even in a year of crop failure provide some fodder for livestock.Concepts and theories are fine, but what is actually happening on-the-ground? This compilation of case studies in this book undercover myriad different initiatives -many of which help to point to a path forward, generally or at least for specific situations. The analysis of the ongoing changes and challenges, and the experiences -failures and successes made so far -will help directly in shaping guidelines for the future.To many observers, rangelands used by pastoralists under common property regimes present a perfect example of the \"tragedy of the commons\".Failures in rangeland development projects have been commonplace.A mid-20th century review confirmed the common position that \"range deterioration has assumed alarming proportions in many areas\". This became referred to as the \"mainstream view\".The mainstream view supported control of livestock numbers through destocking followed by grazing management schemes to achieve an \"equilibrium state\".But the \"mainstream view\" was flawed because pastoral rangelands didn't act in equilibrium; they behaved in an unpredictable way.Despite efforts with creating large ranches and settling pastoralists -by 1990, few range management schemes in dry Africa had an impact on the way communal rangeland was used.The new approach of opportunistic management recognises pastoralists' traditions based on flexible and responsive mobility in the face of an everchanging, non-equilibrium, landscape.Many other theories and ideas have come and gone, but one has persisted since the early 1980s namely \"holistic management\".Moving on to the 2000s this concept of non-equilibrium models and opportunistic management has further evolved into that of making use of heterogeneity.Despite the new concepts of the 1980s and 1990s, the continued trend in government policies has been to privatize land and sedentarize pastoralists.The continued, popular approaches to rangeland management advocated by international development agencies, violate key ecological principles.Despite predictions, debates and theories about \"new deserts\" foreseen 100 years ago, there is still no consensus about how much land has actually suffered desertification.While in some areas the natural resilience of the drylands and its inhabitants has been largely underestimated, other areas have suffered serious land degradation and demand large restoration efforts.The mobility of livestock within the Sub-Saharan rangelands has been a central element of management for thousands of years. Traditionally, rangeland systems were open areas and vast spaces were interconnected. Mobile and semi-mobile livestock production systems are the most prominent traditional uses of rangelands. These systems are dynamic and responsive, giving herders the potential to react to changing rangeland conditions through the seasons. Mobility relates to livestock managers and livestock.Mobility is a logical method of accessing water and pastures in order to maximize animal productivity, reach markets and escape risk -including diseases, conflict with other herders, and wildlife. Many of these factors that dictate the movement of pastoral herds are similar to the forces that drive wildlife in search of fodder and water.Mobility of livestock and their managers ranges from fully mobile nomadic, semi-mobile nomadic systems along opportunistic or clearly regulated routes (transhumance), partial family/ livestock movement, to fully sedentary systems.The mobility of livestock is characterized by:• The type of movement: from opportunistic to well-defined routes; across climatic and ecological different zones (e.g. from dry north to wetter south; from plains to hills). Opportunistic grazing movements enable access to heterogeneous and unpredictable pasture resources to make best use of spatial and temporal variation of the resources.• The timing or seasonality of movement: from following a fixed calendar to remaining flexible according to prevailing conditions.• The distance of movement: this may vary considerably year-on-year depending on seasonality, rainfall, resource availability and 'freedom'/ boundaries to movement. Distances can range from a few kilometres (small-scale) to hundreds of kilometres (large-scale).As might be expected there is a very broad range of both rangeland use systems and management practices in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Therefore, unsurprisingly, there is considerable confusion about the different types of rangeland and the associated land management systems. This lack of clarity can prevent focused discussion on rangeland development and policies, and often leads to ill-informed decisions. This confusion furthermore underlies the difficulties in arriving at informed approaches and strategies to guide good rangeland management under the current dynamic situation that prevails.Based on the documentation of rangeland management practices, of which a selection is presented in Part 2, a literature review and expert consultations, criteria were identified to help define the classification of rangeland use systems and their management.In Chapter 2.1 the following definition was proposed: \"Rangelands are spatially defined ecosystems that are dominated by grasses, grass-like plants, combined with various degrees of bush and tree cover that are predominantly grazed or browsed, and which are used as a natural and semi-natural ecosystem for the production of livestock and safeguarding of wildlife and additional ecosystem services.\"The classification accommodates all the common land use systems that will be defined and addressed in this chapter.As rangelands cover a wider variability in different natural conditions and uses, three key characteristics and considerations must be kept in mind to guide the identification and definition of rangeland use systems. These are mobility, boundaries, combined crop and wildlife management. Enabled mobility is of key importance for rangeland management, be it for daily or seasonal movement of animals, Somaliland (Christoph Studer).• The guidance of the livestock: managed by hired herdsmen, family members, the whole family or groups within a community. Mobility relies on effective social organization and networks.• The reason for movement: whether movement is to access high quality grazing, high quantity grazing (or to seek any available grazing), avoid diseases, or search for markets etc.The mobility of rangeland users and wildlife is increasingly in conflict with the growing pressure on rangelands, where these are being converted to land uses such as cropland, protected areas, fenced-off areas, and urban expansion -all of which limit free movement. Such restricted mobility is one of the major challenges facing livestock keepers on rangelands.The extent of rangelands and their use is defined or limited by various boundaries. These comprise climatic conditions (mainly rainfall, temperature), topographic boundaries (mountains, rivers, lakes, the sea), access to resources (distance from water points, availability of forage and grazing grounds), as well as areas affected by diseases. Furthermore, there are boundaries with other land users and land uses (cropland -rainfed or irrigated -settlements, national parks, mining areas, forests etc.). Boundaries are also influenced or defined by tenure, including user rights: some users claim exclusive use and have formal users' rights or even title deeds, others claim customary or communal rights. Boundaries are also created by political and administrative borders which often limit the mobility of livestock and rangeland users.Even though the focus is on rangeland, some of the livelihood systems include crop production, to varying degrees, as a complementary part of rangeland management. Cropping can be important not just as a supplementary source of food and income for households, but also as a means of mitigating risks. The type of cropping system depends closely on the climatic zone and availability of labour. In some areas cropping can be reasonably reliable -in others it is simply opportunistic.Wildlife have always been an integral part of rangeland systems, as this forms their natural habitat, and rangelands have evolved alongside the indigenous fauna that they sup-port (see Chapter 2.1.7). Wildlife can be part of a livestock production system without providing any additional benefit (e.g. where wildlife comes and goes), or in co-existence with managed livestock within the same area, increasing overall benefits (e.g. where they make use of different forage resources and are harvested), or they can be in competition for the same resources (e.g. through grazing the same vegetation). The nature of wildlife-livestock interactions vary across rangelands, and the impact of competition, disease transmission, and human-wildlife conflict also vary, based on the characteristics of the human and natural context. In the best case scenarios, wildlife can be managed non-competitively alongside livestock, and can offer an additional form of income to rangeland users through both consumptive use (e.g. hunting and cropping for game meat), and non-consumptive use (such as tourism). Additionally, the costs of coping and interacting with wildlife can be reduced through a variety of management practices. In many areas across SSA, livestock are completely excluded from rangeland for the conservation of wildlife in strictly managed protected areas (see Figure 2.11a).Here a typology of rangeland use systems (RUS) is proposed to aid analysis, and in the planning of rangeland management interventions. For purposes of developing a manageable and helpful categorization system, the focus is on scale, boundaries, mobility, inclusion of cropping within the system, and the approach to wildlife management. Based on the case studies documented and described in Part 2 and international discussions and debate on rangelands, six categories are differentiated (Figure 3.1). The attempt to subdivide rangelands into different use systems fully recognizes the variation across, and complexity within, each of these systems as well as 'fuzzy borders' between them. While such a categorization always runs the risk of oversimplification, the aim is to differentiate and focus the discussion on the main, broad types of rangeland uses -and still respect complexity -to help in the analysis of practices and informed decision-making. Furthermore, rangeland managers my shift between different rangeland use systems according to seasons and emergency situations as an adaptation strategy to challenging conditions particularly during droughts or conflicts. The classification is presented in Figure 3.1 and key characteristics of the different RUS are summarized at the end of the chapter in Table 3.1. The main categories of RUS are as follows: right: Former rangeland is being subdivided and settled: small-scale grazing is restricted to areas that are not yet converted to crop production, Kenya (Hanspeter Liniger).1. Large landscape pastoral rangelands (pastoral) 2. Large landscape agropastoral rangelands (agropastoral) 3. Bounded rangelands without wildlife management (bounded without wildlife) 4. Bounded rangelands with wildlife management (bounded with wildlife) 5. Parks, wildlife & nature reserves (parks & reserves) 6. Small-scale settled pastures (pastures)In rangeland use systems (1) and ( 2), people and livestock move over large landscapes. Movement is driven by multiple factors: rainfall gradients which influence the availability and quality of forage, availability of water and mineral resources, security, disease, availability of markets and related services, and grazing and water rights. They tend to follow natural gradients of quality and quantity of pastures and water availability, and are commonly founded in historic community traditions. This movement may be across rainfall and altitudinal gradients, or in and out of wetlands and swamps. It may include transhumant systems where movement typically takes place across different ecological zones and along predictable routes. Or they may be more opportunistic, nomadic or semi-nomadic movements following patchy rainfall and better forage, such as after fire. Legend for the 1. PASTORAL RANGELANDS These are systems in which the majority of the population are pastoralists, whose livelihoods are overwhelmingly based on mobile livestock keeping.Pastoral systems are defined as grassland-based, where more than 90% of dry matter grazed or browsed by livestock is from grasslands and rangelands, and more than 50% of household income is from livestock (as defined by de Haan and Cervigni 2016). They are found mainly in the more arid zones of SSA.Pastoralism is an animal production system -and lifestylewhich is adapted to the heterogeneity of rangeland environments, where key resources of pasture and water for livestock become available erratically and unpredictably across both space and time. Animal and livestock manager movement may be more or less constantly opportunistic throughout the year (full nomadism). Seasonal movement may be according to fixed routes, where herds are driven -with often little grazing along the route -from one grazing ground to another before returning home (transhumance) (Figures 3.2a and 3.2b).• Distances between the night corrals covered during the year: hundreds of kilometres. Area used: tens to hundreds of square kilometres. • Livestock move with no permanent night resting place/ enclosure (fully nomadic) or with a season-long resting place for livestock and herders (semi-nomadic, transhumance). • Animals and herders are mobile along flexible routes, grazing may be planned or opportunistic, and no regular crop cultivation is practiced (nomadic, semi-nomadic).Scale: hundreds of kilometers Ecological gradient HP. Liniger Transhumance systems involve regular movements of herds between fixed areas in order to opportunistically exploit the seasonal variability of climates, pastures and water. Typically they have distinct grazing areas that are used during specific periods, and animals are moved within short periods of time along clearly defined routes and corridors to avoid conflicts and reach other designated grazing grounds. At times this movement may even be carried out by trucks. • There are basically two types of movement: one following the rains and the ecological gradients north-south (e.g. West Africa), the other following ecological gradients from the drier lowland to the wetter highlands and mountains (e.g. East Africa). • Livestock owners/ managers may have a main residence.Herders (owners, managers, family members or hired herders) move with the livestock according to seasonal cycles. Some of the family, and some livestock, may remain at the home-base all year. • Pastoral large-scale rangeland systems are practiced on open access and communal land. Livestock owners and herders in most cases do not own the grazing land, but they almost always have (often complex) customary grazing and water rights. • Purely nomadic systems are on the retreat. Some systems still remain in West Africa in Sudan and Somalia. However, a recent development is the growing number of contract herding systems, where absentee livestock owners contract herders to manage their livestock on rangelands, despite the fact that they may not have water or grazing rights. • Herd sizes range from tens to hundreds of livestock (cattle, camels and donkeys -but also goats and sheep). • Livestock have a seasonal night corral during (during the wet season) but move part of the year without a fixed corral. • Grazing is mainly practiced on communal land (grassland, shrublands and woodlands) but livestock keepers have rights to land for fodder and crop production. • Livestock are mainly dependent on natural forage complemented by crop residues. Crop production may be substantial but is complementary to, and integrated with, grazing and livestock management. • Herds may range from tens to hundreds of animals (cattle, goats and sheep -sometimes camels and donkeys also). These herds are, on average, smaller than other pastoral systems, explained by the fact that rangeland users in this category do not rely solely on livestock.The next three categories are rangelands that are bounded and clearly delineated -thus rangeland use primarily takes place within a defined area. These are 'Bounded rangelands without wildlife management', 'Bounded rangelands with wildlife management' and 'Parks, wildlife & and nature reserves'. The borders of the area may be enforced with physical fences, and/or social fences such as agreed limits to user/ grazing rights between communities, and/or delineated administrative boundaries. Movement out of the area to pastures elsewhere across the larger landscape, especially during dry seasons or during droughts, may sometimes take place. centre: Pastoral systems combined with wildlife management can provide an additional source of income from tourism. Even if not \"used\" for tourism, many of the pastoral areas also have wildlife such as zebra, gazelle, antelope which may compete for the same pasture resources. Avoiding or reducing human-wildlife conflicts poses a special challenge for rangeland management (Hanspeter Liniger).right: Cattle grazing crop residues in agro(silvo)pastoral system, Niger (William Critchley).Agropastoral systems are those in which livestock keepers derive a considerable part of their agricultural income from crop farming -and in which crop residues can make up a significant share of the livestock ration. Generally more than 10% of the dry matter fed to animals is derived from crop by-products/ stubble and more than 10% of the total value of production comes from non-livestock farming activities (as defined by de Haan and Cervigni 2016). They are found mainly in semi-arid zones and subhumid zones.Agropastoralism combines cropping close to the main household with mobile herds of livestock (Figures 3.3a and 3.3b).It has long been a common security strategy in Sahelian and Sudanian zones because of the high level of complementarity between the two activities. The distinction between pastoralists and agropastoralists is becoming more and more blurred, as pastoralists are increasingly engaging in opportunistic planting of small plots in wetter areas or years as a diversification strategy. This is currently the most frequent security strategy in Sahelian and Sudanian zones because of the high level of complementarity between the two activities (Grandval 2012).• Distances covered between the night corrals during the year: tens to hundreds of kilometres. Area used: tens to hundreds of square kilometres. • Herders/ livestock managers have a seasonal or permanent place of residence, and land for cropping which yields agricultural produce for household consumption and fodder for livestock. They may engage in haymaking and local improvement of pastures.Scale: hundreds of kilometers along ecological gradients and/ or seasonal differences Ecological gradient These systems may be privately or communally owned. While they often have a significant amount of wildlife present, commercializing the wildlife is not part of the management system (Figures 3.4a and 3.4b). In the arid and semi-arid zones of East and Southern Africa many of these systems are found as \"community ranches\" or, where owned by individuals, \"private ranches\". Ranches are also found in the humid zone of Central and West Africa but are not common there.In community ranches, land is owned under communal ownership and many have title deeds. A group of herders maintain agreed stocking levels, and while they manage their livestock collectively, they own individual animals. Community ranching in East Africa is implemented in various ways in different countries. For example, in Kenya, community ranches are termed \"group ranches\" and have been officially recognised under the recent Community Land Act, while in Uganda and Tanzania they are commonly referred to as \"communal grazing lands\" and \"ujamaa ranches\" (community ranches), respectively. The production focus is partly subsistence, and thus generally less market-orientated than private ranching. Land management practices including seasonal movement and rotational grazing may also be employed. Bounded systems are also found where official ownership rights are unclear, but social-cultural boundaries effectively create barriers.Private ranches are generally commercial enterprises, with income generation being the primary function of the livestock raised. They specialise in one or more livestock species and produce mainly animals for slaughter (for meat, skins and hides), but also for wool and milk. Large private ranches in East and Southern Africa are generally owned by companies or family businesses. These enterprises use a variety of techniques for range management. Animal movement and pressure are often adjusted to the available forage within the ranch by controlled and rotational grazing, which is influenced -or even manipulated -by the distribution of water points. Herding patterns are closely adapted to the needs of different animal groups, and significant external inputs are required (labour, purchased feed, veterinary medicines etc.). In some ranches, monitoring of ecological and economic factors are also carried out as part of the management system.• Distances covered between the night corrals during the year: several to tens of kilometres. Area used: tens to few hundreds of square kilometres. right: Private ranches combining cattle production and wildlife. Laikipia, Plateau (Hanspeter Liniger).• Livestock movement is practiced but within the bounded areas. In these systems, livestock keeping takes place alongside explicit management of wildlife and biodiversity (Figures 3.5a and 3.5b). The objective of the wildlife management may be conservation for its own intrinsic value (sometimes funded by voluntary conservation donations and/or dedicated organizations), or for commercialization through non-consumptive uses, such as wildlife viewing and tourism and/or consumptive uses, such as hunting.Scale: tens of kilometers Community and private ranches with wildlife and tourism host significant proportions of East Africa's (especially Kenya's) large mammalian wildlife populations (see Figure 2.11). Some ranches in East and Southern Africa have declared themselves 'nature or wildlife conservancies', and work towards enhancing ecologically and economically thriving landscapes that simultaneously support people and wildlife. Conservancies typically have a multi-faceted development approach aiming at (i) building a rangeland governance structure, (ii) improving rangeland management, (iii) boosting income generation activities and, (iv) supporting wildlife and biodiversity conservation.Conservancies on private land are usually individually owned and fenced. However, this is not always the case, and some conservancies -such as those surrounding the Maasai Mara in Kenya -are not fenced, and are managed by groups of private landowners. Private conservancies tend to support a low population density of people, since tenure is generally individual and production is labour-extensive. Due to the reduced mobility of herds, private ranches are obliged to have high quality management standards for livestock and wildlife. Key is management of pasture and water -making sure there is established access to additional fodder and feed during droughts. Many of these private, fenced ranches are found on higher productivity, lower variability areas, which makes this intensive form of management easier.Characteristics of bounded rangeland with wildlife are: • Distances covered between the night corrals during the year: several to tens of kilometres. Area Used: tens to few hundreds of square kilometres. • Livestock managers are often permanent residents.• Management is either individual with private land ownership (private ranching) or by a group of land users (community ranching). • Livestock movement is practiced but within delineated areas. • Livestock management may include rotational and seasonal grazing system. • Community ranches (to varying degrees) and private ranches (generally) have emergency grazing grounds or the financial capacity to produce or purchase feed during times of drought.• Wildlife is \"managed\" by translocation, by the strategic management of resources to influence the functioning of the ecosystems, and marketed through tourism, commercial culling and/or game hunting. This requires extra infrastructure (water, roads, extra reinforced and high fences, security, lodges, etc.) and specialised management capacity. • Managing potential conflict, and competition for resources, between wildlife and livestock is a major challenge for this rangeland use system. • In East and Southern Africa this rangeland use system is often termed \"conservancies\", with a variety of different management models. • Typically herd sizes in private ranches are in the range of several hundreds of animals (mostly cattle and sheep); in communal ranches up to several hundreds of mixed livestock: both smallstock (goats and sheep) and cattle.In both cases the numbers of wildlife vary enormously. Furthermore with migration of some species of wildlife, numbers are not static either.Protected areas situated within rangelands are generally parks or various kinds of reserves (Box 3.1, Figure 3.6). These conservation areas receive protection because of their recognized natural, biodiversity, ecological or cultural values. Within these areas livestock are usually not permitted. However if livestock are allowed, they are regulated in terms of numbers and periods, and are restricted to specific zones. centre: Elephants scooping for water. In the sand holes, the water stored during the floods is less saline than the surface water fed by groundwater from springs (Hanspeter Liniger).right: It is not only the megafauna that attracts people from all over the world. The richness of habitats provides high biodiversity with a rich bird life. Secretary bird in Buffalo Springs National Reserve, Kenya (Hanspeter Liniger).areas in the absence of livestock largely relies on the culling and translocation of wildlife, the use of fire, and strategic location of water sources.Characteristics of parks, wildlife & nature reserves:• Area used: tens to hundreds and a few thousand square kilometres. • Land is owned by state government, non-government organization and private owners. • The areas are delineated and protected through restrictions on use by tourists, nature conservationists, researchers, hunters, and pastoralists, depending on the status of protection.Box 3.1: Protected areas IUCN defines a protected area as: \"A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values.\"The definition is expanded by six management categories:Ia Strict nature reserve: Strictly protected for biodiversity and also possibly geological/ geomorphological features, where human visitation, use and impacts are controlled and limited to ensure protection of the conservation values.Ib Wilderness area: Usually large unmodified or slightly modified areas, retaining their natural character and influence, without permanent or significant human habitation, protected and managed to preserve their natural condition.Large natural or near-natural areas protecting large-scale ecological processes with characteristic species and ecosystems, which also have environmentally and culturally compatible spiritual, scientific, educational, recreational and visitor opportunities.III Natural monument or feature: Areas set aside to protect a specific natural monument, which can be a landform, sea mount, marine cavern, geological feature such as a cave, or a living feature such as an ancient grove.IV Habitat/species management area: Areas to protect particular species or habitats, where management reflects this priority. Many will need regular, active interventions to meet the needs of particular species or habitats, but this is not a requirement of the category.V Protected landscape: Where the interaction of people and nature over time has produced a distinct character with significant ecological, biological, cultural and scenic value: and where safeguarding the integrity of this interaction is vital to protecting and sustaining the area and its associated nature conservation and other values.Areas which conserve ecosystems, together with associated cultural values and traditional natural resource management systems. Generally large, mainly in a natural condition, with a proportion under sustainable natural resource management and where low-level non-industrial natural resource use compatible with nature conservation is seen as one of the main aims.Not applicable: Any protected area that is not legally/officially designated or proposed (e.g. World Heritage Sites and UNESCO MAB Reserves) or does not fit the standard definition of a protected area.The protected area meets the standard definition of protected areas but the data provider has chosen not to use the IUCN Protected Area Management Categories.Not reported: protected areas where an IUCN category is unknown and/or the data provider has not provided any related information.Scale: less than one to a few kilometers HP. Liniger agropastoral and bounded systems. In these cases part of the herd -sick animals, lactating females, young livestock, but also particular animals targeted for sale or slaughter for special occasions (e.g. rams in the Sahel) -are stall-fed or graze on nearby pastures for a variety of reasons.Characteristics of small-scale settled pastures are:• Area used: less than one to a few hectares.• • Wildlife may be confined by fences or allowed to move outside the boundaries or to migrate into dispersal areas -and on to other parks or reserves. • Area of specific importance for plant biodiversity may be given special, localised protection from grazing/ browsing/ fire etc. • The land is predominately used by wild herbivores and carnivorous predators and, at least partially, permits their daily, seasonal and migratory movement. • Access by livestock for grazing may be limited and regulated or prohibited. • Management involves securing conditions that stop poaching, manage visitors/tourists, facilitate research, provide services and manage income. • The range of wildlife species and numbers is so larger that it is impossible to give 'typical' numbers. There may be small numbers of particular wildlife species in specialised parks with defined limits, or at the other extreme, huge herds of thousands of wildlife in the larger parks (especially in East and Southern Africa).In these systems, where climatic conditions allow (high rainfall and lower variability), people and their livestock are permanently settled. Livestock movement is restricted, within small-scale pasture areas or \"paddocks\", which are managed in an intensive manner to produce more, and better quality, forage and fodder (Figure 3.7). Livestock graze these pastures and/or are fed in stalls, where fodder grown on pastures within the confines of their farmland -or gathered from common land -is brought to the animals under \"cut-and-carry\" systems. They may also graze stubble after crops have been harvested, or fed hay which has been produced on the farm holdings. Crops and pastures are integrated on predominantly small-scale farms, with relatively small herds/ flocks of higher quality livestock.Commonly, animals are grazed on pastures but also partly fed on crop residues (stover/ stubble grazing, etc.) and may be given hay during the dry season. Crops and livestock have the same owner. These systems are widespread in higher rainfall areas, and form the backbone of smallholder agriculture. They predominate in humid and sub-humid agro-ecological zones but as population pressure increases they are also increasingly found in the semi-arid tropics of East and West Africa (Bationo et al. 2015, Krätli et al. 2015).In the Sahel and in many agricultural areas in East/West Africa, this system can be a sub-component of pastoral, without wildlife', followed by 'bounded with wildlife' ( 6) and then the 'pastoral' system (5) (Figure 3.8). This confirms that projects tend to focus their attention on supporting agropastoralist systems to create better conditions for the implementation of sustainable rangeland management (SRM) practices. The least number of approaches, apart from 'parks & reserves' were documented for the 'pastures' (4). For the latter, the focus is rather on spreading various technologies that have proved successful. Some approaches support sedentarizing pastoralists and stimulating diversification and income from crop production on the one hand -while recognising mobility as an important aspect of sustainable rangeland and livestock management on the other.Cases of SRM technologies covering 'pastures' are mainly reported from the Horn & East Africa and West Africa whereas 'pastoral' and 'agropastoral' systems are mostly reported from West Africa -with few from the Horn & East Africa and Southern Africa (Figure 3.9a). This may be an indication of how widespread small-scale settled pastures systems are in the different regions, but it is more likely to show where development agencies are making an effort to promote SRM technologies. Interestingly, the number of documented technologies for 'pastures' is much higher than the different approaches, indicating that many SRM technologies can be implemented without specific investment into approaches. However, special efforts are evidently needed for planning and developing an enabling framework for the more demanding large-scale interventions: 'pastoral', 'agropastoral' and 'bounded' systems (Figure 3.9b). • Livestock move short distances that are accessible within one day. Apart from grazing in pastures, they feed on crop residues, and may receive supplementary feed gathered from around the farm. Livestock need full-day attendance. • Apart from grazing, animals are stall-fed with green or preserved fodder (i.e. freshly cut grass or hay), tree/bush leaves, residues from crop production and /or animal feed (harvested or processed). Sometimes fodder is collected from outside the farm. • Common numbers of livestock holdings are a few cattle (usually improved breeds) and varying numbers of goats and sheep.The WOCAT database was used to better understand different rangeland use systems (RUS) and the practices implemented in each. In the following, the 111 relevant practices (69 technologies and 42 approaches) that have been compiled over the last 10 years, including 56 specifically for this book, are analysed and key insights are presented (see Table in Annex). This analysis is aimed at identifying \"good practice\" and thereby generating guidelines for good rangeland management.Out of the 69 technologies analysed from the database, 25 (less than one third) pertain to the RUS 'pastures', around a quarter to 'agropastoral' ( 16), 13 to the 'bounded without wildlife' and 7 to the 'bounded with wildlife' systems, and 6 cases belonging to the 'pastoral' system (Figure 3.8). The low number of large-scale 'pastoral' systems reflects the difficulties in locating and recording these large-scale systems and identifying successful practices amongst them. Documenting a single farm production system, and interviewing one householder is considerably easier than researching a system that covers a community that is on the move in semi-arid areas with mixed herds and complex, traditional rules and regulations. However, the preponderance of settled systems in the sample may also indicate a trend towards loss of mobility, or a search for alternative or complementary livelihoods within increasingly settled pasture systems. In truth, many large-scale pastoral systems have traditionally relied on some sort of opportunistic crop production. But this new dynamic may indicate a trend towards the subdivision of land and intensification of animal production -especially near urban areas and the higher potential zones (e.g. Box 3.2).Out of the 42 approaches, less than one third (16) pertain to the 'agropastoral' and around one fifth (9) to the 'bounded More than 70% of the documented cases, whether technologies or approaches, were introduced or promoted by projects and research (Figure 3.10). This is most likely to be because projects tend, naturally, to document their own achievements rather than to invest in identifying existing traditional and innovative practices and documenting them. For all RUS, about 20-30% of the cases, can be assigned to land users' traditional knowledge or recent, independent innovation such as in the 'agropastoral' system with the approach of 'Empowering traditional Dedha institutions, Kenya' (Box 3.3) and making 'Arrangements to convert degraded rangeland, Namibia' (Box 3.4).In the following, the natural environment of SRM technologies implemented in different RUS is characterized with respect to rainfall, agro-climatic zone, slopes, soil organic matter, biodiversity, availability of surface and groundwater (Figure 3.11). Note that 'parks & reserves' have been omitted from the graphs because the very small sample size (2) distorts the data.Rainfall regime and agro-climatic zone: In three RUS, namely 'pastoral' and 'agropastoral', 'bounded with wild-life', more than 80% of the SRM technologies are reported from areas with less than 500 mm annual rainfall (Figure 3.11b). For the same systems, more than three quarters are categorized as lying in the semi-arid to arid zones (Figure 3.11c). Looking at the rainfall map provided in Chapter 2 (see Figure 2.2b), it can be seen that they are concentrated in the northern part of the Sahelian region of West Africa, in the north-eastern lowlands of East Africa and the western parts of Southern Africa. These areas comprise grasslands, open shrublands and savannahs. Even though 'pastoral', 'agropastoral' and 'bounded with wildlife' systems may cover a wide range of rainfall regimes, the practices documented are located in low rainfall areas. Practices in 'bounded without wildlife' and 'pastures' systems are mainly recorded from drier regions, but some are documented from subhumid and humid areas.Topography is illustrated by the slopes on which the SRM technologies are implemented (Figure 3.11d). The cases documented are generally found on flat and gentle slopes. 'Bounded without wildlife' and 'pastures' systems -latter mainly from Ethiopia -are also recorded as being on hilly and steep slopes. 'Pastoral', 'agropastoral' and 'bounded with wildlife' systems are typified by moderate to rolling slopes.Even though the majority of the land used by single practices is in flatter areas, livestock have access to hilly and mountainous areas, generally with higher rainfall and forage resources, and animals can then move between different topographic environments. However, in the 'pastures' system, cases are generally restricted to a single topographical category.Soils and soil organic matter: Soils in the rangelands vary considerably with respect to soil organic matter -which is an indicator of productivity (Figure 3.11e Bourgou or \"hippo grass\" (Echinochloa stagnina) improves the availability of fodder for livestock in the Niger river's inland delta region. Agropastoralism is taking precedence here over pure pastoralism, and is helping reduce conflict with agriculturalists. There are some interesting initiatives in terms of fodder production techniques: bourgou culture is one of these. Given the lack of forage and pastureland for livestock, land users have taken to replanting and cultivating this indigenous grass.Bourgou pastures can produce up to 30 tonnes of dry matter per hectare in one year, possible due to the wet conditions in the delta. The regeneration techniques used are layering and transplanting of bourgou cuttings or splits. Bourgou has good prospects for the future in areas where it can be grown -based on its nutritional value and yield during the 'lean' season. There is keen interest within the Central Niger Delta -and this forage is in high demand by local livestock keepers.https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/1638/; E. Botoni pers comm.(Malian Ministry of Environment)In the following, the human environment of the of SRM technologies implemented in different RUS is characterized with respect to land and water use rights, land size, market orientation and off-farm income (Figure 3.12).Land and water use rights as indicators of land tenure: For 'pastoral' systems, communal rights apply to all of the practices reported, and in over 60% of the cases, with respect to water (Figure 3.12b and c Chapter 3 Rangeland use systems and their management less than 0.5% SOC, and 38% contained between 0.5% and 2% SOC. The study concluded that the rangelands of South Africa are characterised by topsoils with very low organic matter levels. The main natural factors influencing the organic matter content in the cases throughout SSA were listed as rainfall, vegetation cover, topography and parent material. However, particular management practices such as heavy grazing and burning tend to decrease the level of soil organic matter (and thus carbon). Because of the low levels of soil organic carbon in rangeland soils, there is good potential for sequestering carbon in the soil from the atmosphere through better perennial vegetative cover.In systems with wildlife management, species diversity of fauna is high -in terms of richness that is the number of different species (see Chapter 2.1.7). In the others, species diversity is mostly medium to low (Figure 3.11f). It is low particularly in systems where crop cultivation is prominent such as within the 'pastures' system. Biodiversity in rangelands especially in relation with wildlife management is an important issue, however not addressed sufficiently as the limited examples and data confirm. Moreover biodiversity does not just relate to wildlife, but to vegetation also -and to organisms within the soil which help to drive ecosystem function. The data available in the case studies do not, and could not be expected to, give a full assessment of biodiversity status.Surface water availability: Surface water availability in rangelands is poor to medium (Figure 3.11g). Other than in the 'pastures' system, which can receive high amounts of rainfall (750 to 1500 mm), surface water availability is estimated to be medium. In 'agropastoral' systems, which are generally practiced in areas with less rainfall than in 'pastures', there is less surface water available.Groundwater availability: In many areas, rangelands do have potential groundwater supplies, but wells often have to be drilled to 50 m or more. An exception is under 'pastures', where groundwater tables are at 5-50 m: these are situated in the wetter regions with better surface and rain water availability, whereas the other systems not only have less rainfall and less surface water, but also deeper aquifers (Figure 3.11h). The Jarsa Dedha is an indigenous institution, through which customary laws and provisions guide the management of natural resources. The Boran of Isiolo County, Kenya, like their kin in southern Ethiopia, derive their customary laws from an overall supreme general assembly called the Gadha -under which the Jarsa Dedha falls. The Gadha governing council preserves traditional laws and codes of conduct, as well as issuing amendments and additions based on the evolving environmental, social and cultural context. The system has a set of laws and provisions (seere), customs and culture (aada), and norms and values that govern society.The traditional system, which was devised by the Boran pastoral community and honed over centuries to suit the challenges of the rangelands, has been steadily eroded by external factors and formalised systems after the emergence of the nationstate. This approach -driven by communities and supported by various agencies -aims to revive and strengthen the traditional natural resource management institutions of Boran pastoralists in Northern Kenya. Land size and scale of land use: In the systems where crop cultivation is an integral part of the system, land use is mainly declared as being small-scale; for 'pastures' systems, and for 'agropastoral', 70% and 60% respectively of reported practice are small-scale (Figure 3.12d). This is unexpected for the 'agropastoral' system, however examination of the data shows that land users only referred to their cropland. The 'bounded with wildlife systems' are more than 55% large-scale, compared with 30% in the 'bounded without wildlife'. Conservancies and ranches that include wildlife have, in general, to be large in order to sustain and feed wildlife and livestock.Market orientation and production focus: In the systems where crop production is involved ('agropastoral' and 'pastures') land users have a mixed (subsistence combined with commercial) or subsistence market orientation (Figure 3.12e). According to the examples documented, 'pastoral' systems (e.g. 'Securing pastoral mobility, Chad'; page 127) mainly follow a mixed market orientation. Pastoralists earn money by selling their livestock for slaughter. In 'bounded' systems, production is to a large extent for the market, particularly when wildlife is part of the system and tourism provides revenues (e.g. 'Il Ngwesi Holistic Management, Kenya' (page 157). Where wildlife is not part of the system, subsistence farming is also common.The market orientation of the different rangeland use systems differs considerably, and includes the following products: meat, milk, cheese, blood, hides, honey, medicinal and cosmetic-producing plants (gum arabic, shea nuts, aloe etc), charcoal, and draught animals for hire. There are also incidences of raising and keeping animals as insurance and 'mobile banks', as a statement of wealth, social prestige, and for cultural value. One production focus is income from tourism or grants from agencies for keeping and enhancing wildlife biodiversity -and from protection of endangered species. For the different production systems, herd composition of large stock, small stock, a mix between grazers/ browsers and wildlife plays an important role in marketing and income generation. All of this illustrates the wide variety of different products and markets that rangeland users are involved with; both subsistence and commercial, and both livestock products and non-livestock rangeland products (NLRP).Off-farm income is defined as income not directly from the rangelands, such as part-time employment in business (other than marketing agricultural rangeland products). In all rangeland use systems, except the 'bounded with wildlife' system, off-farm income is usually less than 10% of all income, indicating that a high proportion of rangeland users depend almost entirely on their rangelands (Figure 3.12e). In 'bounded with wildlife' systems, off-farm income of 10-50% is reported in more than half of the cases. In 'Rangeland restoration, Kenya', and 'Grass reseeding, Kenya'; pages 221 and 215) off-farm income is even larger than 50%. In these cases the main income is from employment in tourist lodges or in providing transport for livestock and products.For the characterization of the rangeland use systems, emergency feed and drought need to be considered. All RUS can, and are, affected by unpredictable droughts with growing frequency (see Chapter 2.1.2). The systems with the highest levels of mobility rely on rights and access to supplementary dry grazing grounds, usually integrated into the system, which means adaptation through mobility ('pastoral' and 'agropastoral' system). For the 'bounded' systems livestock and wildlife need fodder and the ability to store emergency Chapter 3Rangeland use systems and their management Box 3.4: Innovative arrangements to convert degraded agropastoral rangeland into fruitful landscape, NamibiaArrangements between a commercial farmer and agriculture students have been made to raise the productivity of rangeland -through managing runoff to grow multipurpose trees and bushes. The objective is to share knowledge and experiences gained by the land user to grow valuable woody plants, grass and herbs, which students can then apply elsewhere.Trees included large canopy species, shorter thornless types for \"chop and drop\" mulching and those that produce fruits or edible leaves. While the banks become crucial fertile patches in this arid landscape, they also act as broad barriers to sheet flow, slowing it down and increasing infiltration rates locally. Thus degraded \"leaky landscapes\" turn into \"sponge landscapes\" and restore deeper and more persistent soil moisture. Apart from classifying the main rangeland use systems (RUS), the sustainable rangeland management practices -technologies and approaches -also need to be grouped to identify common principles and intervention strategies for improved management of the rangeland.Sustainable rangeland management (SRM) is a subset of sustainable land management (SLM) and uses the same definitions with \"land\" being substituted by \"rangelands\" (Box 3.7). In total, 69 SRM technologies and 42 SRM approaches from 16 countries in SSA have been documented in the WOCAT database, and analysed in these guidelines. Out of those, 28 technologies and 28 approaches were documented specifically for these guidelines. Firebreaks are used on rangeland with rainfall between 150 and 300 mm per annum, and are employed as a precautionary measure -to protect forage on rangelands during the dry season following good grass growth. Bushfires are frequent on productive rangelands where there is over one tonne of standing biomass per hectare. Firebreaks cut continuous tracts of rangeland into smaller areas, thus containing and limiting damage in the event of fire. They may be established along traditional tracks, by broadening the width of the pathways. Firebreak gaps simultaneously make it easier to extinguish fires along these corridors, by facilitating rapid access. Preventing spread of fire is achieved through removing combustible material. There are two techniques for creating firebreaks: (i) manually and (ii) by machine. In both cases, a 10 to 15 m wide corridor is cleared, perpendicular to the prevailing wind direction.https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/1616/ (GIZ)More than 70% of the cases documented, whether technologies or approaches, were introduced or promoted by projects and research.About 20-30% of the cases, can be assigned to land users' traditional knowledge or recent, independent innovation.More than 80% of the SRM technologies are reported from areas with less than 500 mm annual rainfall.Cases documented are generally found on flat and gentle slopes.Practices are from areas that have low to medium organic matter content, indicating that they are either from areas with less developed or fertile soils (marginal lands) or from areas affected by high land degradation.Species diversity of fauna is high -in terms of richness (the number of different species).Wildlife management is an important issue in rangelands.Surface water availability in rangelands is poor to medium.For 'pastoral' systems, communal rights apply to all of the practices reported.The 'agropastoral' systems are under communal (organised) and open access (unorganised) regimes.In the 'pastures' systems, land use rights are individual in just under half of the cases.The market orientation of the different rangeland use systems differs considerably, and includes: meat, milk, cheese, blood, hides, honey, medicinal and cosmetic-producing plants (gum arabic, shea nuts, aloe etc.), charcoal, and draught animals for hire.In all rangeland use systems, except the 'bounded with wildlife' system, off-farm income is usually less than 10% of all income.For the characterization of the rangeland use systems, emergency feed and drought need to be considered.Systems with the highest levels of mobility rely on rights and access to supplementary dry grazing grounds, usually integrated into the system.Regulated fire can help control woody species and create space for grassland regeneration -but uncontrolled fires can destroy useful vegetation.Following on from the definitions of SRM and of technologies (Box 3.7) and analysing the similarities and differences of the collected SRM technologies, it is possible to group the technologies according to their main focus in relation to three criteria: movement, forage and water availability. Thus the practices have been examined and the question asked: \"what is the main technical focus?\" and then the SRM technologies allocated within five groups. In some cases, a single practice may fall into two groups -where it was found to have two equally important focuses.The documented practices were classified into the following SRM technology groups (TGs):Enabled mobility (TG1) (including improved access): comprises practices that assist grazing over large areas or diverse zones to seek forage and water using traditional knowledge and innovations, or new technologies e.g. satellite image analysis, early warning systems at large-scale.Controlled grazing (TG2) (including seasonal grazing): involves enclosures, physical or social fencing, rotations, grazing reserves (fodder banks), regulating grazing and mobility.Range improvement (TG3) (including soil improvement): involves management of fire/ prescribed burning, firebreaks, enrichment planting, seeding of leguminous species, control of bush encroachment and alien invasive species, natural regeneration, soil fertility amendments (manure), erosion control, soil moisture (water harvesting micro-catchments), reducing evaporation losses.Supplementary feeding (TG4) (including emergency feeding): may involve (a) fodder collection within or outside the rangeland areas: fresh fodder material, hay making, tree pod collection; (b) production or buying of processed or compound feed: silage, animal feed supplements (bales, pellets), urea and molasses blocks, minerals and salt licks, etc. Supplementary feeding can be applied for increased milk and meat production during normal years and as lifesaving strategy during emergency e.g. droughts.Box 3.8: Sustainable propagation of the fodder plant \"samata\" in MadagascarIn the semi-arid Mahafaly region in southwestern Madagascar, the local agropastoral population relies on livestock keeping.Possibly related to ongoing climate change with shorter rainy seasons and more droughts as well as increasing risks of cattle raids on the inland plateau, the return of the cattle herds to the coastal plain from their annual transhumance tends to start earlier each year. As a result, the grazing pressure on the fragile coastal vegetation increases. During the dry season, livestock keepers use the cut and latex-rich branches of a treelike spurge locally named \"samata\" (Euphorbia stenoclada), an evergreen succulent, as a feed supplement for animals, especially for their zebu cattle. Propagation of \"samata\" through tree nurseries and compliance with recovery periods are important measures to sustain the local livestock system while reducing the pressure on natural vegetation. Infrastructure improvement (TG5): includes the establishment of water points, wells, boreholes, ponds, pans and dams (macro-catchments), floodwater spreading, trenches, drinking water quality protection, livestock corridors, access roads and transport roads of animals and animal feed.Note: the SRM technology groups above apply to livestock management but may also facilitate wildlife managementIn the three SSA regions more than half of all documented SRM technologies (69) are characterized by 'range improvement' (Figure 3.13). One out of seven practices focusses on 'controlled grazing', followed by 'infrastructure improvement', 'supplementary feeding' and 'enabled mobility'. 'Enabled mobility' is missing altogether in Southern Africa -which is because there were no 'pastoral' systems reported from that region (see Figure 3.9a The SRM approaches have been classified into four groups according to their main function. The three criteria used in this classification were the (i) scale of planning and intervention, (ii) market orientation and (iii) income generation.The documented practices were classified into the following SRM approach groups (AG):Community based NRM (Natural Resource Management) (AG1): involves community organisation, formation of savings groups and user groups to plan and govern improved management of the natural resources: vegetation, soil, water and animals (including land use planning at the smallscale).Land & water use planning (AG2) (medium to largescale): includes the establishment of concepts and management plans for conflict management, livestock and wildlife routes or corridors, set-up of water points, resting, rotation, facilitation of multi-level support, multi-stakeholder interaction and agreements, and support for improved medium to large-scale planning and implementation of rangeland practices.Marketing & alternative income (AG3): promotes improved marketing to adapt the products and sales according to market information, through value chain development to shift to high-value (and origin-specific) labelled products (e.g. for 'naturally produced' grass-fed beef or game), to improve abattoirs and value of the meat; non-livestock rangeland products (NLRP), e.g. to legally produce charcoal, firewood, grass for thatching, fruits, nuts (e.g. for shea nut butter), gum arabic, medicinal plants, milk, and payment for ESS.Wildlife & nature tourism (AG4): using and managing the \"value of nature and wildlife\" in parks, reserves and protected areas by providing and managing tourism and collecting revenues from tourists, protection of the land and animals against poaching or interference by other land uses and users.In The analysis of approaches shows that the same condition (e.g. 'land governance') can constrain or stimulate an SRM practice (a specific approach or technology) depending on the situation and specific context (Figure 4.2a). For example, a law on rangeland use could support the implementation of a specific SRM technology, but the same law might hinder another.A comparison with the global WOCAT database -coveringChapter 4 Sustainable rangeland management -drivers, impacts and continuous changeRangelands have continuously undergone, and are still undergoing, changes -albeit at different rates and in different ways across the various regions of SSA. Although generations of rangeland users have lived with change, the current pace and scale is unprecedented (IIED and SOS Sahel 2010). The response from users has been to adapt livelihood strategies to cope with new political, economic, climatic and environmental forces -but the pace of this transformation has sharply accelerated in recent years (Krätli et al. 2014).In order to identify causes of unsustainable practices and to help identify sustainable rangeland management (SRM) solutions, a conceptual framework is proposed to show drivers and impacts related to SRM (Figure 4.1). It focusses on drivers behind land management, their influence on the choice and implementation of rangeland management practices, on the health of the land and the resulting impacts on ecosystem services. This framework has, at its core, a cycle of changes and impacts where SRM is implemented. It illustrates that this is a dynamic process, where the impact of a land management practice in turn influences and changes its drivers. Thus, the altered drivers will lead to a different response, namely a change or adaptation of management, which in turn will have an influence on the state and impact -and so on. Additonally, the framework includes the interaction with external drivers such as global markets (for rangeland products, and rangeland ecosystem services including carbon sequestration), policies for conservation (e.g. support for protection of landscapes and animals), but it also includes the natural hazards of droughts and floods that are increasingly being brought by climate change.Chapter 4 Sustainable rangeland management -drivers, impacts and continuous change Local-national drivers including shocks and extreme events:• Ecological/ natural all land uses -shows that rangelands demonstrate similar hindering conditions: (lack of/ inadequate) 'knowledge about SLM', 'legal frameworks,' 'institutional settings' and 'social/ cultural norms' (Figure 4.2b). But, contrastingly, the same comparison indicates that rangelands are much more sensitive than cropland in relation to 'policies' (mentioned in more than 75% of the rangeland approaches compared with 8% of the global database), 'collaboration and coordination of actors' (68% / 4%), 'markets' (62% / 8%), 'land governance'(62%/ 8%), and 'workload, availability of manpower' (52% / 19%). It could be seen that, when the entire set of documented cases was analysed, these factors were mentioned much less often. Another clear difference is the specific mention of multiple factors enabling the implementation of SRM. In the global database (once again: covering all land uses and not only rangelands) it is only the 'legal framework' that is commonly mentioned as an enabling factor. These results highlight the fact that SRM is hindered by many more issues than other land uses; but also multiple factors are recognised as being favourable.The most important hindering condition mentioned in the SRM approaches is 'policies' followed in importance by 'collaboration/ coordination of actors'. Misguided policies place straightjackets on rangeland management, by leaving little room for flexibility. Furthermore, rangelands with all the complex ecological and stakeholder interactions depend much more on collaboration and coordination of actors to be successfully managed. The same is true for 'land governance', 'institutional setting' and 'legal framework', all of which were mentioned as hindering the implementation of the technologies in more than 50% of the cases.As shown in Figure 4.2a, socio-cultural acceptability, sufficient manpower, favourable policies, governance and legal frameworks, and access to markets for inputs and sales are preconditions for action. Any technology that reduces workloads -and with this requirements for labour -encourages diversification of investment and activities. Lack of knowledge and technical support, and financial resources, are also factors that strongly impede action. Often, exposure to new ideas and innovations, as well as training, trigger action and different kinds of financial support permit action in the first place.Legal framework is mentioned amongst the top ranking factors as being hindering and/or enabling: whether it hampers or helps clearly depends on the specific nature of the legal framework. Even when rules and laws are in place, they are commonly not followed -as for example in 'Integrated approach, Tanzania' 1 and 'Initiative for animal water supply, Tanzania' 2 . Examples of an enabling legal framework are to be found in 'Community participation in GGW, Niger' (page 303), where securing access rights to land and water resources encourages investment in land restoration. The legal framework is also positive in 'Participatory mapping, Kenya' (page 311) and 'Joint village, Tanzania' (page 319). Tanzania's legislation, if implemented well, provides an enabling environment to secure community/ village rights for both individuals and groups. However, the same legislation allows village land to be transferred into public ownership if that is in the \"public\" or \"national\" interest: this then brings insecurity with respect to village land, and hinders SRM.Depending on the technology to be implemented, funds ('availability/ access to financial resources') is often a limiting factor. However, where projects are involved, financial resources are invariably provided -either fully or partially -and hence this becomes an enabling factor, for at least as long as the project lasts. Social and cultural issues, as well as religious norms and values, are also named as hindering factors on the one hand, but contrastingly as enabling on the other. Examples are: 'Transboundary transhumance, Niger and Benin' (page 297), where the approach facilitates the arrangement of social agreements for securing land resources for livestock keeping, but there are still constraints related to the lack of knowledge by herders of the regulations on mobility across the border. QA 2.9 Conditions enabling and hindering the implementation of the approach 60 there is a clear understanding of the benefits of reactivating the traditional social structures and management systems. However, current cultural norms and socio-political systems hinder this, therefore adaptations need to be applied to make them viable under current conditions. 'Kenya Livestock Insurance Program (KLIP), Kenya' (page 337) shows that apart from being the main source of livelihoods, pastoralism is a cultural practice that has been passed on from generation to generation. Pastoralists aspire to protect their herds from all manner of perils, including drought. On the other hand, many of them believe that people should not interfere with God's will and doubt whether insurance is \"halal\" in the context of Islamic Shariah. Such challenges have been addressed by KLIP, through awareness creation and sensitisation in consultation with religious leaders, insurance companies and the local communities. In 'Bush control, Namibia' (page 229), norms and values are enabling factors, but the low level of cooperation and information exchange hinder its implementation. 'Joint village, Tanzania' (page 319) holds that the history of collective tenure, management and sharing of rangeland resources are part of SRM practices. However, marginalisation of pastoralists from decision-making processes at local and higher levels remains a hindering factor.SRM is hindered by many more issues than in other land uses; but multiple factors are also recognised as being favourable.The most important hindering factors in over half of the documented practices are 'policies', 'collaboration', 'land governance' 'markets', legal framework', 'institutional settings', 'knowledge' and 'workload'.If these multiple issues are addressed they can be turned into key enabling factors underpinning successful implementation of SRM.There are a wide variety of purposes cited for applying the technologies (Figure 4.3). Most of the SRM technologies (75%) indicate that taking action against land degradation is the main purpose -even above 'improve production' and 'create beneficial economic impact'. This is logical, since the practices described -especially those associated with projects -specifically address SRM. To be able to improve production, limiting factors such as land degradation have to be addressed first.Around 20% of the cases mention 'adaptation to and mitigation of climate change', 'disaster risk reduction' and 'watershed protection' as specific purposes. These concepts may have been unclear to many respondents -or (in the case of watershed protection) not meaningful at the scale of the particular technology. Off-site impacts are, currently, not given adequate attention compared with on-site effects, which are more immediately rewarding. On the other hand 'conservation of ecosystems' and 'protection of biodiversity' are evidently a real concern.Analysis of the SRM technologies reveals the perceived drivers related to climate change that justify the adaptation or coping strategies offered by the particular technologies (Figure 4.4).More than 90% of the cases report an increase in annual temperature, and more than 40% of cases a decrease in annual rainfall. A change in annual temperature increases evapotranspiration (higher loss of water from the soil surface, and a higher transpiration demand from the vegetation). Furthermore, as shown in Figure 2.2a, high temperatures can create heat stress, which interferes with plant growth and development. As the majority of rangelands are situated in the drylands, higher temperatures increase their aridity in most of Sub-Saharan Africa with major implications for productivity (Lovei et al. 2017, Serdeczny et al. 2017). The popular perception is that rainfall is decreasing across the rangelands. However, in Kenya, investigations in one dryland area generated long-term data that showed an increasing trend (Schmocker et al. 2015, Kihara et al. 2015, Zougmoré et al. 2018), despite the perception of land users that rain was becoming less. This apparent contradiction could be attributed to the reduced response of the land to rainfall, implying that despite the same, or better, rains the land appeared no greener -due to increased evaporation and greater runoff losses associated with degradation. These losses of water can be further exacerbated by a proven trend of increasing rainfall amounts and intensities within single storms and longer dry spells within rainy seasons (see Box 2.1). Of course, it might also be explained by the fact that people, by nature, tend to be pessimistic about the climate.In the last 10 years, 'droughts' are perceived as the most important and increasing climate extreme in the locations where SRM is practiced (>60%) (Figure 4.5). This trend is confirmed by the drought frequency map (see Figure 2.4). Sub-Saharan Africa in general will have to deal increasingly with, and adapt to, drought incidences and lengths in the future. The second most important climate extreme mentioned is 'local rainstorms' (more than 40%).Change in rainfall regimes and intensities were perceivedLand users and specialist implementing SRM focus on the following key concerns in rangelands and related activities: addressing land degradation, improving production, conserving ecosystems, creating economic benefits and preserving biodiversity.Many are also adapting to climate change and extreme events, mitigating climate change and protecting watershed and downstream areas.to increase 'general floods' (30%), 'flash floods' (9%) and 'local hailstorms' (6%) -indeed all can be devastating when they occur in drylands. 'Local windstorms' (32%) and 'sandstorms' (4%) were also said to be increasing. In Senegal a risk assessment and prioritisation survey showed that the main risks in the livestock sector based on severity, frequency and impact ranks were: risks associated with bush fires (ranked 1 st ), followed by risks linked to animal health and diseases (2 nd ), rainfall (3 rd ), markets (4 th ), conflicts (5 th ) and plagues of locusts (ranked 6th and last) (Wane et al. 2016).Climate change, and climate-related extreme events are serious issues to be addressed in SRM Thus a major aim is to increase the resilience against shocks and extremes: first and foremost are drought, floods and wind storms.of cattle has been provided to build resilient livelihoods for local pastoralists. The model works to first buy cattle from NRT-affiliated conservancies, these cattle are sold on weight and grade. It attempts to embrace a more marketdriven approach. Another example of a livestock to markets programme is presented in Box 4.2.Access to financial resources and services: For large landscape 'pastoral' and 'agropastoral' systems, livestock represent, overwhelmingly, the most important form of financial capital for pastoralists. They are the primary source of pastoral income, savings, loans, investments and insurance. Social networks assist in sharing, buffering and minimising risks related to this single-asset economic system under such uncertain conditions. Threats to the herd or to the clan are therefore serious blows to pastoral financial capital. Variations in market prices and problems also represent major financial threats. Lack of access to other sources of income -such as government employment -can also be perceived as evidence of injustice, as the Touareg rebellion in the 1990s attested (Nori et al. 2005). For 'bounded' and 'pastures' systems privately owned ranches and farms have more opportunities for access to financial resources.Access to Infrastructure and services: According to the analysis in Figure 4.6, 'employment' and 'financial services' are poor and are seen to be the most pressing issues constraining the implementation of SRM. Only around 4 to 12% considered the situation of infrastructure and services to be good in the areas where the technologies are applied. Availability of 'drinking water and sanitation', 'education', 'health' and 'roads and transport' were rated slightly better than financial and technical assistance, or access to markets and opportunities for employment.Marketing diversity of livestock and non-livestock rangeland products: In the drylands of SSA, production systems are centred on the rearing and marketing of livestock and animal products. Some practices include commercialised forms of livestock-keeping oriented to large domestic and regional export markets, and smaller scale livestock-keeping for subsistence and local marketing combined with crop production and other rural activities. However, these systems are often complemented by a broad range of non-livestock livelihoods and productive activities. Not all rangeland user focus on animals alone -\"non-livestock rangeland products\" (NLRP) including the service sector (for tourism), and both cosmetic and medicinal produce, constitute a growing part of a wider political economy in the drylands (see Chapter 2.1.3).Accessibility to attractive markets for buying and selling of livestock: Despite livestock production being key in SSA, markets for livestock in the region are faced with significant price disincentives. These disincentives arise from issues related to market inefficiencies, such as exploitation by middlemen, high transport costs, government taxes and fees imposed on cattle trekkers, lack of market infrastructure, financial and technical service constraints, and inadequate market information system (Aklilu 2002, Ahuya et al. 2005, Muthee 2006, Makokha et al. 2013). Given the challenges facing livestock markets and rural households to improve their livelihoods, rural households are likely to explore the possibilities of more profitable uses such as conversion to crop farming, land leases, or sales to immigrant crop farmers (Markelova et al. 2009).Fair prices for all rangeland products: The ability of rangeland users to raise their incomes also depends on their ability to compete effectively in the market. Even though access to markets and improving marketing are a key factor in SRM -either hindering or helping -only a few documented practices have addressed and improved the market situation or facilitated access to financial resources. This needs further attention.Infrastructural services in rangelands are only rarely considered good. Improvements in infrastructure are a prerequisite for the future of SRM.As noted already, polices -or their absence -hinder the implementation of SRM in 75% of the practices analysed under these guidelines, though in 55% of cases they were seen to enable implementation (note: in some case various policies had different effects, thus the total adds up to more than 100%). Lack of policies, existing policies not effectively implemented, or new policies that are in direct contradiction to traditional and customary systems and not consistent with the needs of different rangeland users, all hinder SRM. Two critical issues underlie the problem of missing policies: a knowledge gap and power imbalance. Lack of knowledge hinders an objective view of the merits and demerits mainly of existing pastoral systems, while the power imbalance is responsible for pastoral people not being sufficiently organised and therefore unable to advocate their arguments (ODI 2009). Issues that need to be addressed as priorities are improved tenure security, a closer role for pastoral communities in rangeland management, equal access to pastoral resources for women and other vulnerable groups, the establishment of processes for the resolution of cross-boundary disputes, and improved resource-use technologies and promotion of participation of pastoral communities in decision-making processes (African Union 2013).In Kenya, the most recent policy change, with the acknowledgment of community land in the national Constitution and the adoption of the Community Land Act (2016), provides positive direction for the management and tenure of the remaining community grazing areas. Within the act there is provision for the sustainable management of grazing, while encouraging broader movement of pastoralists within and between community areas through reciprocal grazing agreements among communities. In addition, the Wildlife Act of 2013 includes provision for wildlife conservancies, which across much of Kenya have been a key tool in encouraging the improved use of natural resources, including grazing management. However, despite recent strides, much of Kenya's broader strategies and policy direction relating to country-wide development, such as the National Land Strategy and the LAPPSET (Lamu Port, South Sudan, and Ethiopia Transport Corridor) developments, do not acknowledge the importance of pastoralists and livestock production for the local or national economies. Under these plans, many pastoral areas are labelled as 'undeveloped' and embrace large-scale planned infrastructural and development projects (Mwangi and Ostrom 2009).In Uganda, national policy has taken strides towards supporting pastoral production systems, yet the implementation and detail is missing. For example, the current government has effectively subsidised the conversion of rangelands into agricultural areas through the provision of free tractors and materials to farmers. There is some positive policy in Uganda: Section 47 of the National Environment Act (1995), for example, provides for the sustainable management and use of rangelands, and The National Land Policy (2013) provides for the establishment of appropriate agro-ecological zones, pastoral resource areas and maintenance of an equitable balance between use of land for pasture and agriculture. However, this has not yet been implemented under the National Development Plan (Byakagaba et al. 2018).In Tanzania, policy and legislation differ over the rights and importance of pastoral production and livelihoods. The National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty ( 2004) acknowledges pastoralism as a livelihood, and encourages efficient utilisation of rangelands resources -empowering pastoral institutions. However, other policy, such as the Rural Development Strategy (RDS) 2001, pushes for the sedenterisation of pastoralists. In addition, more recent policy, such as the National Livestock Policy (2006), under Vision 2025, urges the commercialisation of livestock production in the pastoral sector. This has also encouraged sedenterisation and individual pasture ownership. Additionally, Kilimo Kwanza (\"agriculture first\"), the Tanzanian plan to transform the agricultural sector has little support for pastoral management of rangelands. Furthermore, governmental initiatives to confiscate cattle from Kenyans in northern Tanzania, coupled with the registration of Tanzanian pastoralists, may further reduce mobility and decrease pastoral resilience.Policies (and to some extent, legislation) can be in direct conflict with the customary systems of management upon which rangeland management is based. Control of access to, and management of, dryland resources under traditional institutions has, over time, been weakened mainly by unsupportive national policies.International regulations, such as those imposed on import of beef into the lucrative EU market, have resulted in the erection of veterinary cordon fences that disrupt wildlife migration and have contributed to rangeland degradation. This is further exacerbated by the carving up of communal land into leasehold ranches and the segregation of land use into well-intentioned but poorly thought-through zoning as part of land use planning. On the positive side, the partial devolution of wildlife and forest resources to conservancies and community forests has reinstated some incentives for improved management of natural resources.Rangelands span local and national political boundaries, necessitating sharing of resources and ecosystem services. This implies the crucial need for integrated land use planning at various scales and links to be drawn with transboundary agreements.Transboundary natural resource management is important, not only in promoting sustainable natural resource management, but also for stronger regional and subregional integration and cohesion, as well as reducing cross-border tension: hence the alternative name of 'Peace Parks' (used especially in Southern Africa). actors at various levels, and between interests in conservation (for 'green' purposes) and exploitative investments, can lead to conflicts and constraints on rangeland management (Box 4.4). Of all the concluded agricultural deals in Africa, 70% are in SSA, out of which a substantial share is in the rangelands (see Chapter 2.1.5). This underlines the importance of large-scale land acquisitions as a driver of land use change in the rangelands.The loss of large parts of the rangelands to outside players represents a systematic, increasing, weakening and fragmentation of pastoral systems that has important consequences well beyond the pastoral economy as such (Krätli et al. 2014).Tenure Between 2005 and 2009, there was keen global enthusiasm for the shrub jatropha, which many investors, government actors and NGOs perceived as a 'miracle' crop. The reason was simply that plant-based alternatives were looked upon as the answer to shortages of fossil fuels: these were the \"biofuel boom years\". Thus jatropha was ideal: rich in hydrocarbons, it thrived in dry environments and could readily be processed into biodiesel. Plantations were established on a large-scale in Kenya, Mali, Mozambique and Tanzania. Ghana generated a great amount of interest too. Here, a number of private companies were ready and eager to make substantial investments in jatropha farming. Indeed Ghana was set to host a million hectares of plantations under agreements between the government and foreign-owned companies. But, as with many such speculative enterprises, the sector collapsed -failing to realise the initial over-optimistic projections. A start was made, 12-months-Jatropha plantation -Smart Oil (Pietro Fabeni).but unforeseen hurdles and barriers proved insurmountable.The lands acquired through the traditional authorities and Ghanaian middlemen were fertile lands that were, in most cases, under active use by the community for grazing and crop farming: thus conflict could not be avoided. Furthermore, very considerable initial capital was needed, high volumes had to be rapidly achieved, and to compound this, the global financial crisis of 2008 led to many investors pulling out due to lack of funds and fears of volatile oil prices. Low levels of learning and knowledge-sharing between jatropha niche actors in the country, alongside weak public R&D support, reduced access to locally specific technical and managerial information. Rather than land users being involved they were alienated. All-in-all the jatropha 'mirage' in Sub-Saharan Africa proved to be a salutary lesson in how not to develop the drylands.Nygaard and Bolwig 2017; http://news.trust.org//item/?map=jatropha-biofuel-push-in-ghana-runs-up-against-protests; https://beahrselp.berkeley.edu/blog/land-grabbing-and-jatropha-boom-in-ghana/ Jatropha seeds from Ghana (Jatrophaworld.org).An example where lack of rights hinders implementation is: 'Mugie Livestock to Markets, Kenya' (see Box 4.2).In this case, laws encourage sub-division of rangelands into small units that are unviable in terms of maintaining essential ecosystem services or economic use. The 'Chyulu Hills Community REDD + , Kenya' 3 highlights the problem of management of different parts of the landscape by various authorities following different laws: this leads to confusions and conflicts that hinders the implementation of SRM.Land use rights documented are mainly communally organised (35%) followed by individual/ rights (31%) (Figure 4.7).Water use rights are mainly communally organised (31%) with open access unorganised use rights a little less (21%).According to Figure 3.12, most of the individual (and leased) land use rights are found in 'small-scale settled pastures', as well as 'agropastoralist' systems.Due to an increase of multiple claims over rangelands, compounded by increasingly limited resources, land and water use rights play a key role in enabling or hindering implementation of SRM. There are basically two categories of rights: formal/ legal rights and informal/ customary rights. In some situations these two rights are in conflict.Efforts to harmonise the two -e.g. by formalising customary rights -can remove obstacles to successful spreading of SRM: see for example the technology 'Dedha grazing system, Kenya' (page 149). Another example of formalising customary rules is the effort to ensure wide dissemination of community legislation governing the management of transhumance practices, and thus enabling conflict-free and sustainable access to resources for livestock keeping, as that lend themselves to crop production and more intensive forms of livestock keeping within integrated systems, in place of traditional mobile pastoralism (Woodhouse 2003, Sonneveld et al. 2010, Awgachew et al. 2015). Land titling is favoured by many current global development cooperation efforts, leading to fencing and fragmentation (Lovschal et al. 2017).Common types of fragmentation -all of which transform habitats -include residential and urban development, establishment of ranches, commercial/ large-scale agriculture, conservancies, small-scale agriculture and perhaps unexpectedly, encroachment by invasive plant species (Flintan 2011a), for example Prosopis spp in Kenya, Ethiopia, Somalia and Sudan 5 (see Box 4.10 Woody Weeds). Agriculture compartmentalises rangelands by introducing fences and water channels and by utilising dry season grazing lands as farms (Kariuki et al. 2018). Land fragmentation is a direct threat to both wildlife conservation and pastoral mobility (AU-IBAR 2015).Pastoralists sometimes encourage land subdivision when they want to protect their land from agriculturalists and conservationists, or when there is uncertainty over the leadership and effectiveness of communal land tenure. The outcome of land privatisation is a decline in exclusively pastoral systems, increased sedentarisation and livelihood diversification (Kariuki et al. 2018).In the Sahel, settled families have increasingly privatised resources, putting more pressure on herders, while in East Africa there is growing subdivision of rangelands -'landscape fragmentation' -that has led to declines in wildlife and livestock numbers (Mwangi 2009, AU-IBAR 2015). The impact of these trends has been to increase conflicts, impoverish herders and has led to further degradation of the environment (AU-IBAR 2015).Chapter 4 Sustainable rangeland management -drivers, impacts and continuous change The context of many pastoral societies in SSA is changing and so is the role of women in these societies (Flintan 2011b). In many instances, changes to pastoral communities, for example those based on greater commercialisation, further marginalise agropastoral female livestock keepers (Esenu and Ossiya 2010). However, the role and resource rights of women are being increasingly accommodated in new laws and codes with the aim of removing gender bias as an obstacle to change.• Under the new Kenya Land Act, gender equity is a given right and protects women's access to matrimonial property and land. Within the same law, women can also inherit land from their parents (previously, only male children were entitled to inherit property) and contributions to accrual of property including non-monetary contributions is now taken into account during divorce. Under the Community Land Act, 2016 also in Kenya (where many rangelands fall under communal management), gender discrimination is not permitted. Through marriage, men and women gain automatic membership to the community, and thus to community resources, which only ceases in case of divorce 4 .• The Ethiopian National Action Plan for Gender Equality 2006-2010(MoWA 2006) identified severe gender inequalities especially in pastoral and agropastoral societies. The plan called for specific measures to increase gender-balanced representation within the political and public sphere with special attention to women in pastoral regions.• The African Union's policy document on pastoralism is the \"Policy Framework for Pastoralism in Africa\". Strategy 1.5 specifies that the role and rights of women in pastoral communities is to be strengthened (African Union 2010). A series of policies and pastoral laws have been approved and in general they support SRM. Implementation should focus on adherence to the laws and the proper interpretation and implementation in practice.Efforts to clarify and formalise customary rights and harmonise them with formal legal rights are rewarding in terms of SRMThe issue of mobility against sedentarisation must be continuously addressed and questioned.Multiple and especially transboundary claims over rangelands need to be addressed and solved to avoid pastoral use becoming increasingly marginalised Land grabs must be addressed and reduced in the rangelands.Tenure, land and water rights are a key challenge to SRM: clarity on tenure and rights and finding practices that work well is the starting point.Care must be given where different tenure and rights -communal, individual or open access -apply to separate parts of the rangelands.Due to increasing claims over rangelands, compounded by decreasing resources, land and water use rights play a key role in enabling SRM.A critical issue regards droughts and the need for emergency grazing grounds or access to fodder supply and /or fair markets to sell animals.The role and rights of women are increasingly being accommodated in new laws and codes. Nevertheless, gender bias needs further attention.areas will thus require substantial adaptation interventions in rangeland management to ensure sustainability (Rigaud et al. 2018). For the remaining part of Sub-Saharan Africa aridification is predicted to increase re-enforcing pressures on outmigration.In more than 50% of the approaches the higher workload and lack of manpower are reported as hindering SRM, while 45% actually cited a reduction of the workload and associated need for manpower under the new technology/ ies as being an enabling or stimulating factor (see Figure 4.2a). Often cited reasons for labour constraints are outmigration and HIV-AIDS.Sub-Saharan Africa is home to only 12% of the global population, yet accounts for 71% of the global burden of HIV infection 6 . East and Southern Africa is the region hardest hit by HIV. Countries mostly affected are South Africa (25%), Nigeria (13%), Mozambique (6%), Uganda (6%), Tanzania (6%), Zambia (4%), Zimbabwe (6%), Kenya (6%), Malawi (4%) and Ethiopia (3%) 7 .Data analysis shows that in almost 45% of the documented technologies conflict, was an issue (Figure 4.9). Furthermore, in almost 55% of the documented approaches, conflict mitigation was cited as an issue. Many conflicts within the rangelands are actually between groups of pastoralists competing for the same resources of grazing and water: and this situation is getting increasingly serious. Other conflicts -perhaps better publicised -are between pastoralists and farmers. Although conflict mitigation was not often the primary motivation behind SRM (though around 35% of the approaches it was: see Figure 4.30), it was influenced -showing that often conflict, in its diverse forms, may be a root cause and an underlying driver of improved SRM. Since conflicts are often about human relationships, approaches to improved SRM, rather than technologies themselves, would be most appropriate to tackle these problems. In the 'Community based rangeland management, Kenya' (page 287) involvement of customary institutions has contributed to mitigation and resolution of conflicts. 'Farmermanaged natural regeneration (FMNR), Kenya' 8 brings local stakeholders together for a dialogue and solving conflicts e.g. between livestock keepers and farmers.The growing population, and current levels of malnutrition, in most African states will require a massive and continuous increase in agricultural production over the coming decades (see Figure 2.6). There is an expected population growth of 3% per year for pastoralists and 2.5% for agropastoralists, assuming the same ownership patterns, and based on a \"business-as-usual\" scenario characterised by current policies (de Haan and Cervingi 2016). Touré et al. (2012) recorded an increase in the overall rural population of the West African drylands of 2.4% per year between 2005 and 2010. Almost all countries in Sub-Saharan Africa need to increase agricultural production. Land shortages are one inevitable consequence, where farming communities \"spillover\" into rangeland areas in search of cropland (Liniger et al. 2011). Thus crop production is encroaching into rangelands together with rapid urbanisation, which often occurs on the best alluvial land, alongside perennial water sources.If rangelands remain marginalised, with marginal services, and marginal opportunities -the younger generation will simply move away, leaving women and older people behind. Therefore, even if population density does not increase as predicted, the composition of people in terms of age and gender will continue to alter throughout the entire Sub-Saharan rangeland crescent. This is a strong driver of change with respect to land use and its management.It is often assumed that migration from rural to urban areas and the resulting concentration of populations in cities will ease the pressure on natural habitats. In many remote parts of SSA's rangelands, out-migration and subsequent concentration of people in urban areas has indeed reduced populations, thus leading to reduced rates of resource use: but closer to rural centres (with better infrastructure) and urban areas, the population of rangelands is still growing. Furthermore, land speculation by wealthy urban residentsencouraged by lack of land-use planning and control -has also driven the loss and fragmentation of rangelands close to towns and cities in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda. In West Africa, the increased demand for food in cities has incentivised some groups to convert forests to agricultural fields to meet this demand. These examples underline the fact that any relief from pressure on habitats from rural-urban migration may be overtaken by the increased demand for food and other natural resources from rapidly growing African cities (Güneralp et al. 2018).Figure 4.8 demonstrates that internal climate migration is likely to increase in Sub-Saharan Africa under three climatic scenarios -due to lower water availability and crop productivity, alongside rising sea level and storm surges. Two factors may be driving this. First, Sub-Saharan Africa is particularly vulnerable to climate impacts, especially in already fragile drylands and along exposed coastlines. Second, the region's agriculture sector, which employs a significant portion of the labour force, depends on rainfall for almost all its crop and livestock production (Rigaud et al. 2018).In East Africa, where aridification is predicted to remain stable, or to decrease, due to increasing rainfall (see Figure 2.2b, Figure 2.5 and Traditional natural resource access rules are rapidly changing. These were often based on a symbiotic relationship between crop farmers, who benefit from manure and the availability of draught animals as well as meat and milk, and pastoralists, who profit from crop residues, stubble grazing, and barter of their products for grain. However, in many areas, crop farmers are increasingly investing in livestock, while simultaneously pastoralists are taking up cropping as herd sizes fall below the minimum to sustain their households. The symbiotic relationship between crop farmers and pastoralists is, therefore, eroding. Furthermore, both groups are losing land to expanding agribusiness and real estate development. As a result, increasing competition for access to water and dry season grazing is marked by occasional outbursts of violence (de Haan et al. 2016) Livelihoods, poverty and market orientation Livelihoods in the rangelands, as has been noted, are diverse. Furthermore, there is a distinct disparity in wealth, between the few with substantial herds and the many with a small number of livestock.In order to better understand drivers originating from the livelihoods of the people, a number of characteristics about the households and their market orientation have been analysed, based on the rangeland practices documented (Figure 4.10).• Around half of the documented cases cover small-scale land use, about one fifth cover medium -and one fifth cover large-scale land use. However, this may not be representative of the different rangeland use systems in the SSA rangelands, where large-scale and mediumscale account for the largest area. • Over all technologies, the highest percentage (42%) is characterised by mixed (subsistence/ commercial) market orientation, followed by subsistence (32%) then commercial (16%).• About the same number of SRM practices are implemented by individuals (42%) as by groups (38%). The rangeland use systems that integrate crop production depend more on individual land users than systems based solely on livestock production. • Furthermore, 'collaboration/ coordination of actors' was cited as being one of the top hindering factors (Figure 4.2a). This is to be expected, as effective rangeland interventions mean communal and multi-stakeholder involvement and large-scale coverage. Responding to this requirement, there is a new movement emerging which organises and legitimises groups and associations. These include pasture user groups, group ranches, cooperatives and user associations (Box 4.5). The goal is to overcome constraints to investment and detrimental changes in rangeland management.• Most of the technologies are applied jointly by men and women (60%) compared to men alone (22%). Women, perhaps unsurprisingly, rarely apply SRM technologies independently. • However, with changing dynamics, especially men leaving for urban areas in search of employment, women are increasingly finding themselves in positions of dayto-day decision-making, but seldom make major decisions such as sale of land. This outmigration of men is, however, leading to a 'feminisation' of agriculture and rangeland management (though seemingly less so), but with little associated decision-making power. This scenario, therefore, has implications on both labour and management.• In 35% of the technologies 'middle-aged' land users carry out the main role in livestock rearing/ range management activities, followed by 'youth' (18%) and 'elderly' (5%). • However, the results show a picture contrary to what might be predicted. The expectation would be more and more outmigration and diversification of income by 'middle-aged' and the 'youth', leaving behind 'elderly' land users to carry on with the lead role in livestock rearing. However, the documented results show that this has not happened -at least not yet, or at least in the areas analysed. Access to SLM knowledge and technical support was mentioned in more than 50% of the approaches as hindering implementation of technologies and in slightly less than 45% as enabling (see Figure 4.2a). Knowledge was often seen as insufficient and limiting.• Valuable traditional knowledge is continuously being lost, but it could be argued that it is no longer applicable to the same extent as before, since many of the challenges to rangelands are new. But it is widely agreed that loss of traditional knowledge, and poor integration with new ideas and concepts, constrains adaptation to changing conditions in the rangelands (Jandreau and Berkes 2016). • Knowledge about recent experiences, innovation and research are not sufficiently shared. • Land degradation processes in rangelands are still (even after decades of concern) not well understood, and shortcomings in knowledge have contributed to poorly informed interventions -even leading in some cases to increased degradation. Knowledge gaps result from a limited understanding of rangeland ecology (Davies et al. 2015).Population growth and migration are still major drivers of change in land use and rangeland management.Outmigration, especially of young males, tends to lead to feminisation in several rangeland use systems. Practices more focused on gender and reduced labour input have higher rates of successful implementation.There is increasing migration of people predicted due to aridification especially in Western and Southern Africa.Security and conflict resolution is reported to be a key issue in half of the cases and thus represents a top priority.There is a bias on reporting (and supporting) of small-scale practices which cover a small proportion of the rangeland. Large-scale mobile systems are less supported as they may be too complex and demanding for projects.Implementators should consider that more than half of the rangeland users implementing SRM are considered poor to very poor: they need support to implement SRM, or they have to implement low cost practices.Successful practices are implemented by both individuals (especially where crop production is integrated) and groups.There is a new movement towards organising and legitimising pasture user groups and associations, group ranches, and cooperatives.In West Africa at regional level, the Billital Maroobe Network (\"Reseau Billital Maroobe\") for livestock keepers and pastoralists works to defend the interests of its members. The network is convinced that pastoralism, based on spatial and seasonal mobility, represents an essential form of production through its economic, social, cultural and ecological contribution to arid and semi-arid areas. Training and capacity building to improve SRM knowledge and skills at different levels and extension services are suffering from decreasing financial support in many countries within SSA. Furthermore, constraints include shortage of trained personnel, and inadequate advisory and extension services.A wide variety of drivers seem to be important for rangelands. The magnitude, combinations and change of these drivers make rangeland management especially challenging.Rangelands throughout Sub-Saharan Africa are currently subject to three major new, additional or aggravating pressures: (1) increasing demands and claims on rangelands (driven by land demand for agriculture and nature conservation), (2) habitat fragmentation (changes in land use and land use rights) and (3) climate change (altered rainfall and seasonality patterns).Chapter 4 Sustainable rangeland management -drivers, impacts and continuous changeImproving knowledge is key in successful SRM. Poor understanding of land degradation and its consequences needs special attention.Training and capacity building at all levels to support planning and implementation of SRM emerge as a major need.Policy is very important but not always well thoughtthrough and not always implemented even when on the books. However, new and more enlightened policies are emerging on the one hand (rights to land and passage; transboundary agreements etc.) and on the other hand customary law is beginning to be accepted as legitimate.Conflicts and security play an important role in policy formulation, especially at national level.The following presents an analysis of the SRM practices -technology and approach -in the context of responding to the drivers discussed above (see Figure 4.1). While not meant to provide an exhaustive and comprehensive description of all options available, this section seeks to showcase most promising practices for upscaling. These are presented by groups.In the following, the five SRM technology groups (TGs) (see Chapter 3.2.1) will be further characterised based on the analysis of the cases available for SSA. The SRM TGs are:Enabling mobility and access to grazing -TG1 (5 cases) Controlled grazing and seasonal plan grazing -TG2 (11 cases) Range improvement -TG3 (38 cases) Supplementary feeding -TG4 (6 cases) Infrastructure improvement -TG5 (9 cases)Origin/ introduction of the technology: In the technology groups 'range improvement', 'supplementary feeding' and 'infrastructure improvement' the technologies were predominantly introduced by projects (Figure 4.11a). In 'enabled mobility' and 'controlled grazing', where 'pastoral' and 'bounded' systems are involved (see Figure 3.14), i.e. covering larger areas, the technologies implemented are also based on traditional practices or are innovations by land users.Improvements in infrastructure are also often applied largescale, but because they frequently involve high establishment costs and need maintenance, funding through projects or subsidies is often necessary. 'Research' was mentioned as being integrated into around one third of the cases documented under 'supplementary feeding' and one fifth of the cases of 'range improvement' and 'enabled mobility'.In 'enabled mobility', prevention and reduction are the focus of addressing land degradation. In controlled grazing and infrastructure, improvement inventions are done almost evenly at all stages (Figure 4.11b). 'Range improvement' and 'supplementary feeding' (e.g. cut and carry) are primarily implemented to reduce land degradation or restore land -but obviously both lead also directly to improved production as a result. These two groups directly manage the range, in contrast to 'controlled grazing' where the range is managed through the grazing of livestock and/or wildlife. mal recovery from the previous full year's grazing. In 'Il Ngwesi Holistic Management, Kenya' (page 157), grazing in villages is planned for the rains, then \"bunching\" and moving of all animals in herds is practiced during the dry season. Denuded land is recovered by a \"boma\" (corral) technology: i.e. strategic corralling of animals overnight, and reseeding (a vegetative measure).'Range improvement' and 'supplementary feeding' are based mainly on vegetative measures, but are often combined with specific management, structural and agronomic measures. For example, firebreaks to stop the progression of fire into large areas of grazing land, and bush thinning to stimulate the re-growth of grasses, are of paramount importance for protecting and securing grazing -as described in 'Firebreaks, Niger' (page 195), and 'Bush thinning and biomass processing, Namibia' (page 229), respectively. In 'Grass reseeding, Kenya' (page 215), the vegetative measure is combined with a structural measure in the form of furrows capturing rainwater where it falls, to increase availability of water for emerging seedlings.'Infrastructure improvement' clearly consists, by definition, mainly of structural measures. An example is 'Forage Christine, Burkina Faso' (page 263), where a main well with submersible pump is combined with a secondary well, which is equipped with a hand-operated pump are installed for watering livestock in the dry season. However, to a lesser extent (than the previous two technology groups) it can be combined with management as well as vegetative measures.In the 'Vallerani system, Burkina Faso' (page 183), a special tractor-pulled plough constructs micro-catchments for the sowing of indigenous species. Soil organic matter in rangelands has already been identified as low to medium (see Figure 3.11). This applies to all technology groups (Figure 12e). Only in controlled grazing are the cases mostly under soil with medium levels of organic matter. The few cases with high soil organic matter content are within the supplementary feeding and infrastructure groups -again typical of the higher rainfall areas with better soil fertility.Species diversity was reported highest in controlled grazing and lowest where 'range improvement' and 'supplementary feeding' was applied -in areas with more intense land use and less biodiversity (Figure 12f). In the other SRM technology groups, species diversity was generally medium.Surface water availability under all SRM technology groups mostly reported to be medium to poor: this is to be expected from the rangelands (Figure 12g).Groundwater availability in the 'enabled mobility' and 'controlled grazing' groups, is a constraint as the level of the groundwater table is deep (> 50 m) (Figure 12h) and this prevails in the 'pastoral' rangeland use system and in the Off-farm income is generally less than 10% of the total (Figure 4.13f). The implication is that rangeland users depend very closely on their livestock, on supplementary crop production, and in some areas on non-livestock range products (NLRP), which are also considered on-farm income (see Chapter 3.1.3). An exception is the 'controlled grazing' technology group where off-farm income of between 10 to 50% is common, resulting mainly from wildlife, and thus tourism, being part of the system. In 'Borana ranch grazing, Kenya' 9 , livestock production is combined with conservation and tourism, which generates 10-50% of off-farm income.Costs of inputs needed for establishment and maintenance:'Range improvement' and 'infrastructure improvement' are the most demanding groups in term of establishment costs, as they require high labour input, costly equipment, and construction material to implement the technologies as well as to maintain them (Box 4.7, Table 4.2). Labour is the main requirement for maintenance. 'Range improvement' needs initial investment in plant materials, for example for reseeding of grass and its 'maintenance'. 'Supplementary feeding' shows a medium to high level of need for labour and plant material. Fertilizers, and probably less so biocides, may also contribute to costs in the 'range improvement' and 'supplementary feeding' groups.Regarding 'enabled mobility and 'controlled grazing', these groups are 'undemanding' to implement and maintain, as they don't require much labour or input costs.However, it has to be noted that the results discussed above do not constitute a full set of data. Only the cases that have given their costs per hectare are comparable. Maintenance costs are those that relate to maintaining a functioning system. They are regularly incurred and are accounted for on an annual basis. In general these are made up of labour, equipment and agricultural inputs.The four SRM approach groups (AGs) (see Chapter 3.2) will be further characterised based on the analysis of the cases available for SSA. The SRM AGs are: International organisations are also well represented in all four groups. Since rangeland management is complex and challenging -combining different livelihoods, and requiring various skills -land users and livestock keepers can often benefit from outside expertise and support. Multistakeholder involvement and dealing with their diverse aims and objectives is key to successful implementation of SRM.Under 'community based NRM', decisions on the selection of the technology were taken mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists, or alone as an independent initiative. In the 'land & water use planning' and the 'marketing & alternative income' groups, it was most common that all relevant actors took part in the decision making process.Land user and community involvement in different phases: In more than 55% of the cases, land users and local communities have been interactively involved in all phases of the approach (Box 4.8), most particularly in the planning phase (in almost three quarters of the cases; Figure 4.15). External support is sometimes needed in the implementation phase as a subsidy or an incentive to trigger initial action. Land users are almost always part of the implementation phase, either interactively (64%), or through self-mobilisation (17%). In the monitoring phase, land users were interactively involved or self-mobilised in two-thirds of the cases, though they were passive or not involved at all in a quarter. This stage is key in conferring a feeling of responsibility, and land users should always Take-home messages 'Range improvement' and 'supplementary feeding' directly manage the range, in contrast to controlled grazing where the range is managed through the grazing of livestock and/or wildlife.'Range improvement' is generally implemented in semi-arid and sub-humid areas, while 'supplementary feeding' predominates in the sub-humid and humid areas where fodder crops can be most readily grown.Even though most of the rangelands and their use is in the flat lowlands, mountains and hills provide valuable resources during droughts.Costs are hard to compare: in many technologies inputs are not fully reported and some calculate by area -but others by unit of infrastructure (wells; firebreaks etc.). Some technologies are prohibitively expensive.Land use rights are most frequently communal: all of those cases assigned to 'enabled mobility'. However, individual land use rights are much the most frequent in small-scale systems.Water use rights in the cases documented are mainly open access and communal: typical of classical rangelands.Scale of land use varies considerably except for 'enabled mobility' where largescale rangeland management is predominant.The commercial sector dominates 'controlled grazing' typical of commercial ranches. All other technology groups are mainly mixed, or subsistence.Off-farm income is generally less than 10% of the total except where wildlife, and thus tourism, are part of the system.Interactive: means that local people and the project team jointly analyse the situation, jointly develop action plans and form institutions, and jointly decide on the use of resources.External support: means that local people participate in return for food, cash, or other material support.Passive: means that local people participate by being informed what will happen or has already happened. They may also participate by being consulted or by answering questions, but they do not decide.be involved. It hardly needs to be re-emphasised that high levels of involvement and active roles of land users in all stages of implementation is fundamental to the success of upscaling SRM. This is essential to create a better sense of ownership -and to ensure continuation of activities after external support has been withdrawn. All efforts should support their involvement while simultaneously building their capacities to initiate further SRM initiatives that are appropriate, and adapted to changing conditions. Technical and financial support: The support needed and most demanded in the documented approaches was for capacity building, and for monitoring and evaluation (Figure 4.16). In 'Integrated management of savannah, Tanzania' 16 , knowledge acquisition and skill development was achieved through extension advisory services, demonstration plots, and on-the-job and action based training.In 'Pastoralist field schools, Ethiopia' (page 279) hands-on experimental and participatory learning improve livelihoods and resilience of pastoral communities.Given the fact that knowledge has been stated as being one of the top constraints to successful implementation of SRM, the value and importance of capacity building and training cannot be overstressed. Advisory services were provided only under 'community based NRM', but it is heartening to note that research was an integral part of the approach in all four groups. Financial and material support were received by land users for implementing the technology in every group, but to a varying extent: half of the cases under the 'land & water use planning' group, 60% under 'marketing & alternative income group', 78% under 'community based NRM', but all cases under 'wildlife & nature tourism'. Since most of the technologies are project-based, this nature of support is to be expected. In all four groups, organisational development is missing and the indication is that this issue was not an objective of the projects. This is a paradoxical finding as institutional set-up was stated to be an important hindering factor.Cost and investments: Annual budgets for SRM diverge widely (Figure 4.17), indicating the very wide range and scale of approaches; these include, for example, traditional, innovative and project-supported approaches and corresponding technologies and different scales from local to transboundary to joint village approaches.Under 'community based NRM' a wide spectrum of annual costs are involved, with 35% lying in the USD 10,000 -100,000 range and almost 20% between USD 100,000 and 1,000,000. < 2,000 2,000−10,000 10,000−100,000 100,000−1,000,000 > 1,000,000 NALand & water use planning AG2Wildlife & nature tourism AG4Figure 4.17: Annual budget in USD of the SRM component of the approach in percent of total number of approaches within each approach group. NA = data not available.However, clearly, as with the technologies, costs should be related to the benefits of the investments. If, compared with the costs, the benefits are much higher than current practices then further investments can be justified. Obviously, the level of investment in the interventions depends on the available financial resources of land users and projects. Costbenefits are discussed further in Chapter 4.4.Subsidies are costs not borne by land users, and can be an important incentive and motivating factor. Over a third of the documented approaches did not receive any subsidies, with the exception of the 'wildlife & nature tourism' group (Figure 4.18). Of the 'marketing & alternative income' group, not one of the six cases subsidised labour -in contrast to the other approach groups (> 30% of the cases). However, one fifth of the cases received subsidies for equipment, agricultural inputs -such as seeds -and infrastructure.A wide spectrum of different technologies and approaches have been identified. Dividing technologies and approaches into groups helps to focus on specific types of problems and targeting solutions. It furthermore helps to streamline actor involvement, SRM measures and investments.Annual Budget USD 10,000-100,000 USD 100,000-1,000,000 In most cases, land users and local communities are interactively involved in all phases of the approach; most particularly in the planning phase. This proves to be a prerequisite for successful implementation of SRM.Since rangeland management is complex and challenging, land users and livestock keepers can often benefit from outside expertise and support. This is an opportunity for valuable project interventions.Another key to successful implementation is to recognise the origin of SLM approaches. Increasingly many projects build on already existing SRM approaches and technologies, adapt and develop them further.Multi-stakeholder involvement is key to successful implementation of SRM.Capacity building and support for monitoring and evaluation are top priority in all AGs.Organisational development is missing as an objective of the projects. This is a paradoxical finding as institutional set-up was stated to be an important hindering factor. .18: Subsidies to specific inputs and labour of the approach in percent of total number of approaches within each approach group. NA = data not available.Each land management practice, and change in practice, has an impact on the rangeland's resources: on the soil, the water, the vegetation and the animals it carries. In the following, various impacts of SRM technologies on the \"health\" (or \"state\") of the land are analysed and discussed. Dependent on the technology, these impacts may be negative -continuing and accelerating land degradation if the practices are not adapted or suited to the particular site where applied -or alternatively impacts may be positive, reducing degradation, restoring land, or preventing land degradation where the land is still healthy if the practices fulfil the criteria of SRM. Indicators of the health of the land's resources on-site are presented in Table 4.4 and are further elaborated in this chapter. Impacts of land management also affect health of land off-site (see Chapter 4.4).The main purpose/ objective of applying SRM technologies is to reduce, prevent and/or restore land degradation (see Figure 4.3). The practices documented show that the urgency of addressing land degradation in the rangelands is recognised, and it is being specifically targeted.Biological degradation of the vegetation cover is a major problem cited in all groups, followed by soil erosion by water (Figure 4.19; Box 4.9). The exception is the 'enabled mobility' group where water degradation is perceived to be as important as biological degradation (the two major degradation factors limiting livestock production). 'Infrastructure improvement' technologies also address water degradation through, for example, weirs that span the entire width of a valley to spread floodwater over the adjacent land area ('Water spreading weirs, Chad' 17 ). Soil erosion by wind appears to be more of an issue in the 'controlled grazing' group, as does soil fertility in the 'range improvement' group.Water degradation (decrease in water quantity and/or quality) is found throughout the SRM technology groups, but perhaps because it is generally accepted as inherent and inevitable in the drylands it does not appear to be the main focus of the technologies. However, given that soil erosion by water (and accompanied loss of runoff) is such a serious problem, then logically water degradation should also be cited -as the two go hand-in-hand. Chemical (fertility) and physical (compaction) deterioration are also issues that are addressed via the SRM technology groups -given varying, but in general low, importance.Closer inspection of the different degradation types addressed by technologies in Figure 4.20 reveals the following:For vegetation, a reduction of cover is the major problem under all technology groups. This represents a loss of biomass -most importantly perennial grass cover -and thus reduced forage availability. Furthermore, there is degradation in the quality of the biomass and species diversity decline indicated in all groups. This compounds the problem. Not only is there less biomass but it is of poorer quality: the implication is a loss of forage/ fodder resources for livestock and Reduced cover leads to additional negative impacts: compaction, sealing and crusting, resulting in increased runoff, and erosion by water and wind. Thus, addressing vegetation degradation must be seen as the key priority. Vegetation -comprising the grass and herbaceous layer beneath the bushes and trees (where present) -is the basic resource of the rangelands.Degradation due to fire appears to be only seen as an issue in the 'controlled grazing' 'infrastructure improvement' groups (mentioned in around 30% of the cases). Do fires impede or improve pastures? Probably either, depending on the frequency and the heat of the fire, and the context in which it is used (Box 4.11; see Chapter 2.1.9).Soil loss due to erosion by water is, in all groups, the most commonly perceived degradation type that technologies are designed to address. Considering that most of the rangelands are in the drylands, it seems paradoxical that the most serious problem is runoff causing serious erosion, but lack of vegetation cover at the beginning of the rainy season explains this phenomenon. Soil erosion by wind is also seen an issue, but less than erosion by water in all technology groups except under 'enabling mobility', where it is absent. Soil fertility decline is an issue that is addressed to a certain extent in all technology groups, but particularly in the 'range improvement' group. Soil compaction is more prominent in the 'infrastructure improvement' group, where it is mentioned in more than 40% of the cases. Micro-organisms within the soil itself constitute a factor that has not been documented or analysed here, but this aspect of below-ground biodiversity is of immense importance to maintenance of soil health. All soil degradation types threaten the productivity of vegetation. However, any soil degradation also affects water availability: first by reducing rainwater storage in the soil, as a result of crusting and sealing, which reduces infiltration and increases runoff; secondly by reducing the soil's water storage capacity. This leads to a vicious cycle of degradation, where vegetation degradation increases soil degradation, which leads to further vegetation degradation -and so on in a descending spiral (Box 4.12). A fundamental challenge for SRM is to break out of this cycle.Water: Aridification may be accelerated by climate change, but the more urgent issue is aridification caused by people through poor land management. The vicious cycle depicted in Box 4.12 shows how the soil is deprived of precious rainwater: increased runoff and greater evaporation of water from the barren soil surface lead to more arid conditions. A very considerable, but unperceived, loss of water is direct evaporation from the surface or the top soil, amounting to 60-80% of the rainfall in areas with sparse grass cover (Liniger et al 2011). This is a shockingly large loss of precious rainwater in water-scarce rangelands. However, aridification due to reduced soil water availability/ moisture is only reported from around 20% of all technology groups. In the 'enabled mobility' groups the focus is more on surface water availability, and is mentioned in 60% of the cases. The 'infrastructure improvement' group's emphasis is on changes in groundwater level and surface water availability. Aridification in rangelands, despite its severity, is the least perceived face of degradation: it is a hidden threat, a stealthy process with multiple detrimental impacts.Surface water degradation is also a consequence of the vicious cycle of degradation; more runoff leading to floods, and causing erosion. Heavy sediment loads in rivers pollute the water, and siltation reduces the capacity of dams and lakes. Droughts are exacerbated when there is less water in the soil -and in dams also. It is a sad irony that areas already suffering from water scarcity lose so much in runoff and floods. This process can be exacerbated by inappropriate location, alignment and design of infrastructure such as water points, fences, roads, bridges and culverts 18 .Biodiversity: All SRM technology groups address loss of biodiversity. 'Range improvement' practices pay more attention to quantity, species composition and diversity decline than to habitat diversity. Around half of 'controlled grazing' and 'infrastructure' cases mention that both aspects of biodiversity are being addressed (Box 4.13).Many alien trees and shrubs have been deliberately introduced in SSA by development projects for timber, firewood, fodder, or other purposes. However some have 'escaped', invaded productive land and threaten native species and ecosystem function. Across East Africa and the Horn, prosopis species native to Central and South America are now a severe threat to grassland ecosystems. The consequences for ecosystems are serious, since prosopis at a cover of over 60% completely displaces perennial herbaceous vegetation, as it is a heavy water user and competitor with the grasses. In Afar Region, Ethiopia, prosopis was first planted in the early 1980s; now the evergreen Prosopis juliflora has invaded more than one million ha (Figure 1), while grassland cover has dropped by 25%. The most rapid change is on the Awash River's floodplains -priority areas for dry season grazing. Combined with the expansion of cropping, the invasion has led to an almost complete loss of grasslands in the upper parts of the floodplains (Figure 2).At low densities, prosopis may provide some useful services, including urgently needed firewood and charcoal. While the leaves of prosopis are hardly eaten, the pods are palatable to a range of domestic livestock and can be included in mixed diets. However, as livestock go in search of ever-decreasing grazing land they carry the seed of prosopis and spread it in their dung. Also, the aggressive invasiveness of prosopis and its tendency to form impenetrable thickets changes the ecosystem and its services, including an almost total loss of fodder productivity for livestock and wildlife, a decline in biodiversity -including medicinal plants -and a depletion of soil water and groundwater. Modelling has revealed that almost all floodplains in Afar region are suitable for prosopis. Hence, further spread is highly likely and unless remedial measures are taken, it will displace the remaining grasslands. This in turn increases the likelihood of ethnic conflicts as pastoralists compete for diminishing forage.Restoring prosopis-invaded areas poses a serious and urgent challenge. As Prosopis juliflora, the most invasive species in East Africa and the Horn, is largely fire-resistant, management by fire is no option. Some projects claim that prosopis could be a potential income source through carbon credits. A better alternative may be cutting prosopis, killing the rootstocks, planting and assisting regeneration of native grasses, shrubs and trees, and combining this with allocation of secure land use rights -as pioneered in Baringo County, Kenya.Here, there has been a huge local increase in fodder, while soil organic carbon has been restored to higher levels than on prosopis-invaded land (Fig 3). Another possible strategy is to introduce natural enemies, specific to prosopis, native to Latin America, into East Africa for biological control. This approach is being successfully applied in Australia, where the wisdom of introducing another alien species is seriously questioned.Box 4.10: Invasive alien species as drivers of rangeland degradation: the example of prosopis Chapter 4 Sustainable rangeland management -drivers, impacts and continuous changeManagement of fire is crucial to its utility as a tool for increasing rangeland productivity. Poor management of fire, or over-occurrence -perhaps as a result of climate change -can lead to the decline of vegetation types that are fire-sensitive. This alters the composition of plant communities more radically, reducing rangeland biodiversity (Polley et al. 2017). Strategic management of fire, however, can help ensure sustained rangeland productivity. Controlled burning can also assist in reducing fuel loads and thus the risks of large-scale unplanned fires, which may cause loss of pasture across vast landscapes. Furthermore, rangeland management by fire can help manage invasive plant species; on the other hand fire can promote certain invasive species that are resistant to burning. Grazing in planned locations can be a tool to manage fire, by effectively creating firebreaks in the landscape through reducing biomass. However, overgrazing, where too much vegetative biomass is lost overall, can lead to the end of traditional fire management techniques in rangelands.Landscapes that have been shaped by controlled fires show a greater functional heterogeneity than those in which fires occur less often (Fuhlendorf et.al. 2017). Little is known about the specific effects of rangeland fire management on livestock production, despite pastoralists using burning since time immemorial. It is known however that livestock gain proportionally more weight from equal quantities of vegetation on burned sites. This is due to the increased digestibility and higher concentrations of nutrients in regrowth. The protein content and digestibility of grass is higher from regularly burned sites. Unsurprisingly, herbivores prefer grazing on recently burned sites (Sensenig et al. 2010, Limb et al. 2016).Box 4.11: Fire management Prescribed burning in South Africa at the end of the dry season (left) triggers a green flush of grass growth after the first rains (right) (Hanspeter Liniger).Species diversity: a measure of diversity within an ecological community that incorporates both species richness (the number of species in a community) and the evenness of species' abundance; species include all fauna and flora above ground and in the soil (modified from eoearth.org).Habitat diversity: refers to the variety or range of habitats in a given region, landscape, or ecosystem (modified from oecd.org).The practices documented show that the urgency of addressing land degradation in the rangelands is recognised, and is being specifically targeted.A reduction of the vegetation cover is the major problem under all technology groups, most importantly perennial grass cover. Not only is there less biomass but it is of poorer quality.Management of fire is crucial to its utility as a tool for increasing rangeland productivity. Poor management of fire can lead to the decline of vegetation types that are fire-sensitive.A vicious cycle of degradation can occure where vegetation degradation increases soil degradation, which leads to further vegetation degradation -and so on in a descending spiral.Aridification in rangelands, despite its severity, is the least perceived face of degradation: it is a hidden threat, a stealthy process with multiple detrimental impacts.According to the technical reference on \"interpreting indicators of rangeland health\" (Pellant et al. 2005) rangeland health is defined as \"the degree to which the integrity of the soil, vegetation, water, and air, as well as the ecological processes of the rangeland ecosystem are balanced and sustained.\" Different land management practices have varying impacts on the state or \"health\" of the land resources, which can be assessed through several indicators. An assessment was carried out by land users and SRM specialists -based mainly on observations -but supported with measurement where possible. Figure 4.21 shows the impact of the implementation of the SRM technologies on the state of the land using the indicators of vegetation, soil, water and biodiversity.The application of most rangeland management practices from all five SRM technology groups improve soil cover by almost 60% (Figure 4.21) but most prominently in 'range improvement' and 'controlled grazing'. Furthermore, almost half of all technologies have improved the above-ground biomass, thus increasing the carbon stock. However, in the 'supplementary feeding group' 18% of the cases reported a negative impact. For 'supplementary feeding' grass is cut and carried to the animals, thus removing the biomass from the fields. Soil cover (in contrast to 'vegetation cover') includes any material that covers the soil: dead or alive. Vegetation cover is by living plants. Under the technologies cited, green vegetation cover is improved -but not as much as total soil cover, indicating that decomposing vegetation and dead material have also increased.Maintaining healthy and productive rangelands needs a continuous effort to maintain a high cover of vegetation, good soil properties, high water use efficiency and biomass productivity.The aim is to establish a sustainability cycle. If vegetation cover is reduced, soil properties, water availability and biomass productivity begin to decline, and this triggers a downward spiral with further degradation of cover, soil, water and biomass. At any stage of the downward spiral, interventions can be made to stop the trend and redirect it into an upward spiral. The earlier the intervention and investment in SRM the less input needed and the easier it is to use the capacity of nature to restore itself: so crucial in the rangelands. Most effective interventions relate to vegetation cover improvement -especially grass -and this can be assisted by water harvesting measures and manure application (see Box 4.14).Box 4.12: Land degradation and land improvement spiral Where the soil was bare, the surface was sealed, the topsoil was hard and sterile, and no water infiltrated. This vividly illustrates the spiral towards degradation and the impact of SRM less than one meter apart (Hanspeter Liniger). Structural changes in plant cover, notably the loss or gain of shrubs and trees, also affect grass and herbaceous cover and productivity. On the one hand, browsing, tree and bush cover destruction by elephants, gathering of fuelwood and charcoal making, as well as clearing and burning for agriculture, can reduce the tree and bush cover. On the other hand, bush encroachment and tree cover increase due to reduced competition from grasses and less frequent and less intense fires (e.g. Rogues et al. 2001) and lead to degradation, for example in Southern Africa -due to invasion of thicketforming acacias (see Box 4.10).Practices for removal of invasive species can improve soil moisture availability and help to conserve the water table and in-stream flows. Invasive species such as the non-indigenous tree prosopis (Prosopis spp. or 'mesquite') reduce access to productive resources of pasture and water, by forming impenetrable thickets, suppressing indigenous vegetation, and by lowering water tables. Their economic impact is often profound. SRM practices to reduce invasive species and increase perennial grasses are 'Rangeland restoration, Kenya' (page 221) and 'Combating invader plants, South Africa' 19 . Other examples of loss of quality due to bush encroachment include 'Bush control, Namibia' 20 and 'Bush thinning and biomass processing, Namibia' (page 229).Among Sub-Saharan African ecosystems, savannah vegetation has been identified as one of the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Over the last century, the encroachment of woody plants has already affected savannahs. Observed expansions in tree cover in South Africa have been attributed to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and/or nitrogen deposition (Wigley et al. 2010). In the western Sahel, however, a 20% decline in tree density, and a significant decline in species richness across the Sahel was observed over the second half of the twentieth century, and mainly explained by changes in temperature and rainfall variability (Gonzalez et al. 2012). However, increased rainfall, a revision of laws governing ownership of trees, and a surge in land users' protection of emerging seedlings and trees has led to a reversal of this trend in many parts of the region (Critchley 2010). Sustainable rangeland management practices that address this problem include 'Assisted natural regeneration, Niger' (page 205).However, the major concern is the loss of perennial grass cover -its replacement by forbs and weeds -and the exposure of barren, locally hard-crusted soil surfaces, changes in the micro-climate and increases in the aridity of rangeland through greater loss of rainfall in runoff (see Box 4.18). All of this hinders revegetation, and the rehabilitation of rangeland becomes difficult or even impossible, with a marked reduction in overall productivity and loss of many valuable plant species. SRM practices to address this include various water harvesting technologies (see Box 4.16) that capture runoff and use it for better vegetative growth (e.g. 'Vallerani system, Burkina Faso', page 183) -and protection of the natural water harvesting system such as \"brousse tigrée\".High levels of cover by perennial grasses play a key role in protecting the soil surface against raindrop impact; it holds soils and reduces runoff. Crucially these species, by definition, provide at least some cover at the end of the dry season. Overgrazing and poor management of livestock has the potential to greatly reduce perennial grass cover (e.g. Pratt andGwynne 1977, Briske et al. 2008), thereby greatly accelerating rates of soil erosion and rangeland degradation (Milton et al. 1994, Liniger and Thomas 1998, Fynn and O'Connor 2000). Apart from the problems of loss of soils, loss of deep-rooted perennial grasses decrease productivity of the rangelands (Box 4.14;O'Connor et al. 2001). Thus, for most of the practices, a major aim is to create better conditions for perennial grasses to spread -either by seed, rhizomes or stolons.A decrease in soil loss (in 55% of the cases), reduced surface water runoff (in 42%), and increase soil moisture content (in 44%) have been the reported positive impacts of the rangeland management practices documented (Figure 4.21). The impact is moderate or substantial, especially in the 'range improvement' and 'infrastructure improvement' groups.There are associated increases in soil cover, improvements in range health and species compostion, improved water infiltration and better recharge of soil water. Several technologies illustrate the attempt to do so: 'Rangeland restoration, Kenya' (page 221), 'Reshaping gullies, South Africa' (page 235), 'Grass reseeding, Kenya' (page 215) and 'Assisted natural regeneration, Niger' (page 205). Additionally, structures to harvest water mainly for livestock, but also from people and small-scale crop production have the effect of capturing runoff, thus reducing water loss and soil erosion considerably, and with that comes improved soil moisture and fertility. Better soil organic matter and nutrient cycling, in other words improved soil fertility, is also reported in 30% of the cases. Box 4.15 shows an example of top soil organic matter enrichment due to corralling.Nearly half of the technologies implemented had a slight to very positive impact on regulating surface water runoff (Figure 4.21). This was (to a greater or lesser extent) observed in all technology groups except for 'enabling mobility'. Examples of positive impact on water runoff in the group 'controlled grazing' is 'Assisted natural regeneration, Burkina Faso' 21 ; in 'range improvement' is 'Gully erosion management, Ethiopia' 22 ; in 'supplementary feeding' is 'Intensive Livestock Management, Uganda' 23 and in 'infrastructure improvement' is 'Permeable rock dams, Burkina Faso' 24 . Most observations of water harvested come from the 'infrastructure improvement' group. In two cases within the 'range improvement' group, a negative impact on surface runoff was reported, for example in 'Firebreaks, Niger' (page 195) where surface runoff increased to at least 20% after the clearing of a firebreak. Technologies that enhance groundwater recharge include 'Sub-surface dams (SSD), Kenya' (page 271) and 'Infiltration ditches and ponding banks, Namibia' 25 .Rangeland management is recognised as being able to affect water supply both in terms of quantity and quality.Ensuring water availability for domestic and livestock supplies is essential for productivity and human well-being in the rangelands. In dry areas, this requires installation and operation of infrastructure, which is often expensive. SRM technologies can increase on-site water availability at a relatively low financial and ecological cost by harvesting runoff, reducing evaporation and improving the management of livestock watering points. An efficient and strategically located network/ distribution of water points is a key element of sustainable pastoralism: it helps to assure a balanced distribution of herds, and thus avoids overuse of vegetation around a limited number of wells (e.g. 'Improved well distribution, Niger' 26 and 'Indigenous livestock watering, Tanzania' 27 .Water quantity: Making productive use of potentially damaging runoff through in situ water conservation and water harvesting methodologies (Box 4.16), conserving soil and water, and promoting practices to improve cover within the different SRM technology groups are key issues.Appropriate improvements in water infrastructure however can play a key role in the rangeland use systems (see Chapter 3.1). One particular sub-set are water harvesting structures that harness and hold or spread runoff, for example and especially permeable rock dams and water spreading weirs (Box 4.17), or reshaped gullies. However, land and water rights must be in place to assure the effectiveness of water harvesting systems. For example, in Ethiopian spate systems water rights are different from the rights that govern the sharing and allocation of perennial flows (van Steenbergen et al. 2011). They are more dynamic and respond to a situation that differs from year-to-year, as well as seasonally.Pasture management affects the proportion of rainfall that is lost as runoff, as it creates the ecological conditions for improved water infiltration -thereby maintaining water tables and surface river water flows (Descheemaeker 2009, Blignaut et al. 2010, Taye et al. 2018) Regeneration of rangeland productivity in communal grazing areas through grazing plans and merging herds was begun in 2006 at Erora, Namibia. Approximately 1200 cattle from 12 households were combined. Livestock owners noticed higher densities of annual grasses after the first season, then a dramatic improvement in soil cover after three years with emergence of grass seedlings where none had grown for decades.Then after another three years, perennial grasses returned with increased biodiversity in many parts.Movable night corrals (bomas or kraals) are located on bare patches of soil to recover the degraded land through dung accumulation and breaking of the soil by hooves. Traditionally, these are formed by thorn-fence corrals used for months or years, but there are also metal-fence mobile corrals which can be moved after few weeks or even a few days (Porensky and Veblen 2015).Results from an experiment in the semi-arid Laikipia rangelands of Kenya show not only improved spread of grass but also that former corral sites have significantly higher amounts of soil organic carbon (SOC), as well as macronutrients in topsoil compared to close-by reference sites (Herger 2018). Improvements are more pronounced after a number of years: thus former corrals turn into 'ecological hotspots' with improved grass cover -and stay that way for long periods of time, dependent on management (Figure 1).On the investigated sites, each night corral was moved on average, after one to two weeks during the dry season and one week during the wet season. In one corral of 1000 m2, 400 cows were corralled at night. Former bare patches with this corral treatment recovered well after a few years (Figure 2). Box 4.15: Grassland rehabilitation and topsoil organic matter enrichment: the impact of strategic 'mobile' corralling In Uganda, an enterprising community has been restoring denuded land in this way for a number of years through its own initiative (Muwaya et al, 2016). Night corrals are fenced with cut thorn bush and used for several months before being moved. The aim is to achieve a depth of 5 cm animal manure over the whole area. The naturally occurring stargrass, Cynodon spp, spreads through its vigorous stolons, which colonise the enriched area, forming a dense sward (Figure 3). Pasture dry matter was recorded to have increased to 4,500 kg/ha (from virtually none) and soil organic matter increased from 1.3% to 3.1%.In this technology, land restores through localised nutrient enrichment, altering soil texture, grass recovery, and attraction of livestock and wildlife (Veblen 2012, Porensky andVeblen 2015). This positive effect has been proven to be long lasting for this reason (Augustine and Milchunas 2009). This means that the concentrated supply of dung is continued through this preferential grazing and resting also long after the corral has been removed. Thus former corrals sites can still be detected today as tree and shrub free vegetation patches with rich grasses -often surrounded by bare ground. In-situ moisture conservation keeps rainfall in place by improved rainwater infiltration and reduced evaporation (soil and vegetation cover) and improved soil water holding capacity (soil organic matter content and structure); Water harvesting captures precipitation falling in one area and transfers it to another, e.g. micro-and macro-catchments; basic components are a catchment or collection area, the runoff conveyance system, a storage component and an application area.\"Tiger bush\" (brousse tigrée) is a naturally occurring WH system occurring in low slopes of arid and semi-arid regions such as Sahelian West Africa. It consists of alternating bands of trees or shrubs, separated by bare ground or low herb cover, that run roughly parallel to contour lines of equal elevation. On the bare soil, 80 -90% of the rains is translated into runoff. Trees and grasses capture the runoff and utilise it after infiltration.In the dry valleys of Chad where water flows in the rivers for only a few days a year, weirs serve to distribute the incoming runoff over the valley floor and allow as much water as possible to infiltrate the soil. The aquifer is thus replenished and is then available for agricultural use.In Niger, a weir enabled expansion of a production area from 2.85 ha before to 5.29 ha after (effects in Chad were similar). In Chad millet yield increased from 160 kg/ha before construction of a weir to 655 kg/ha afterwards. Users of water-spreading weirs had 112% higher incomes compared to farmers outside the impact zone from sales of vegetables and surplus grain.In some communities, groundwater has risen to a depth of 6m below the surface. The increase in groundwater level has led to a significant increase in the number of cattle that can be watered -from 6,000 before to 16,000 cattle afterwards Box 4.17: Water-spreading weirs for the development of degraded dry river valleys; ChadAerial view of a water-spreading weir, Chad (Heinz Bender).https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/1537/; (Nill et al. 2011) Water-spreading weir, Mali (Klaus Wohlmann).managed, continue to maintain the water cycle and maximise productivity with relatively little additional investment by rangeland users. But where vegetation cover over large areas has been lost, this can make runoff more difficult to handle and causes alterations in the hydrology of the system.In short, sustainable rangeland management can play a positive role in the dryland water cycle. This is difficult to quantify, but where rangelands are being degraded or converted to other uses, and the on-site capacity to hold runoff is lost, the negative effects on hydrology both on and off-site become more apparent as downstream water supplies are affected. Water quality: Vegetative cover, root systems and soil properties are recognised as playing essential roles in not only regulating water flow but also in improving water quality. In around 10% of the practices a positive impact on water quality was reported. Vegetation, microfauna and microflora in healthy soils reduce pollutants from overland flow and in groundwater through various means.These include trapping water and sediments, adhering to contaminants, reducing water speed and enhancing infil-tration, biochemical transformation of nutrients, absorbing water and nutrients from the root zone, stabilising eroding banks, and diluting contaminated water (Elmqvist et al. 2010). Questions regarding water quality take second place to the more pressing issue of water shortage and availability. However, the value of potable water -and danger of deterioration of water quality especially when humans and livestock share the same sources, should not be underestimated. An example reporting benefits to waterFrom a series of studies carried out on two neighbouring ranches, one a private ranch and the other a group (community) ranch, with similar environmental conditions -but very different management practices and grazing pressures -productivity and environmental impacts were assessed and compared (Figure 1).Box 4.18: Comparing neighbouring private and group ranches in Kenya: impact on the land Figure 1: Biomass total and grazed, soil organic carbon, surface temperature, (infiltration) and runoff from a private and the neighbouring community ranch (Hanspeter Liniger based on Kironchi et al. 1993, Okello 1996, Liniger and Thomas 1998, Herger 2018). Characteristics of the two neighbouring ranches:The grazing pressure in the community group ranch is six times higher yet the biomass available is less than half than in the private ranch. While it could be argued that the group ranch is over ten times as efficient -in terms of maintaining livestock numbers -livestock growth rate was not measured. Furthermore, the livestock from the group ranch are not entirely restricted to stay within their own demarcated areas, especially during dry seasons and droughts (grazing on neighbouring private ranches, on farms of agro-pastoralists or in forest reserves).There is a marked difference both under trees and in the open grassland areas where the private ranch has around double the biomass -and twice the amount that is grazed. Soil organic carbon (SOC) of the topsoil under trees in the private reaches 2% compared with about 1% in the community ranch. Under open grass cover SOC in the private ranch is 1% compared with 0.78 % in the group ranch -where perennial grasses have almost disappeared.Measuring surface temperature in the early afternoon reveals very wide differences. Under trees 25-29 degrees are recorded depending on herbaceous cover. On patches of good perennial grassland the temperature is around 30 degrees, while where the red soil is exposed, it heats up to 50-60 degrees.There are major implications for water loss by evaporation and runoff and also for soil biodiversity: the earth becomes dried out and, eventually, sterile (see Box: 4.22).Runoff rates also change dramatically depending on the cover and the management: bare land in the group ranches can lose 60% -90% of daily rainfall. Combined with direct evaporation from the surface this means greatly reduced vegetation growth. Yet, keeping land covered with perennial grasses not only maintains cooler conditions but also captures rainfall and even runon water from neighbouring bare soil patches: a \"virtuous cycle\".Box 4.18 continued: Comparing neighbouring private and group ranches in Kenya: impact on the land This example illustrates how different land management can have a fundamental impact on the soil, microclimate and vegetation -and how vegetation itself can contribute to improved growing conditions. Apart from a reduced biomass production, there is also an increase of undesirable plant species (e.g. opuntia) in the community ranch. Striking is that these differences occur next to each other within a few meters distance.Figure 3 illustrates the effect of cover on runoff and soil loss for soil derived from metamorphic gneisses. The straight line in (a) encloses the maximum percentage of runoff that occurred. With a herbaceous cover of less than 5%, over 90% of the rain can be lost through runoff; at a cover of 40%, runoff is reduced to practically zero. For soil loss, the figure shows that with a cover of more than 20 %, topsoil loss is reduced to almost zero. However, on long slopes, gully erosion can occur if enough surface runoff is accumulated and able to cut into the topsoil. quality is 'Indigenous livestock watering, Tanzania' 28 , not allowing animals to enter into the water ponds but drink from troughs instead. The impact of good land management on water quality -and thus water-borne diseases and livelihoods -has not been sufficiently established, but the connection is clear.Over all the documented practices almost 20% indicated a positive impact on habitat diversity, with as many as 45% under 'controlled grazing' practices (Figure 4.21). The fact that habitat diversity is recognised in so many cases indicates an element that would be worthwhile further exploring. In particular the role of alien -and some native -invasive species leading to the loss of grass cover and increasing land degradation still needs keen attention (see Box 4.10).The role of fire on its own, or in combination with bush encroachment, has been reported to affect biodiversity (see Box 4.11). 'Enabled mobility' is a group where there are almost no remarks about how it affects the state of the land -though it would be expected that grazing pressure would diminish. But evidently the impacts are not perceived -possibly because the scale is too large to allow recognition of changes in degradation status.Box 4.18 shows and example of of contrasting differences in land management and the impact on the health of the land.This section describes the nature and value of SRM impacts on ecosystem services, in water-stressed and droughtprone rangelands across Sub-Saharan Africa. It highlights the benefits of SRM from cases documented by WOCAT in different parts of SSA. Each technology and approach generates an array of social-cultural, economic and ecological impacts which must be taken into account for planning and decision-making for further implementation. The influence of SRM on ecosystem services can include both on-site and off-site impacts. On-site impacts are directly important to the rangeland users, but off-site impacts also affect other groups in society. Table 4 .5,Figures 4.22 and 4.23 show and analyse the impact of the technologies and approaches on the services for production, nature and people.Bush encroachment and tree cover increase due to reduced competition from grasses.Among Sub-Saharan African ecosystems, savannah vegetation has been identified as one of the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change.A high level of cover by perennial grasses plays a key role in protecting the soil surface against raindrop impact; it holds soils and reduces runoff.A major aim is to create better conditions for perennial grasses to spread -either by seed, rhizomes or stolons.Rangeland management is recognised as being able to affect water supply both in terms of quantity and qualityMaking productive use of potentially damaging runoff through in situ water conservation and water harvesting methodologies conserving soil and water, and promoting practices to improve cover are key issues.Sustainable rangeland management can play a positive role in the dryland water cycle (quantity and quality)Providing forage and fodder: The technologies applied had a positive impact on fodder/ forage production (in around 75% of the cases), on livestock production (60%) and on fodder/ forage quality (50%) (Figure 4.22). Fodder/ forage production improved considerably in 80-100% of the cases pertaining to 'controlled grazing', 'range improvement' and 'supplementary feeding' (data from WOCAT DB). Under 'infrastructure improvement', fodder production was improved in only 40% of the cases: it is not the primary objective in those situations.However, improved fodder/ forage production was adjudged to be of overall priority for rangeland management, ranked even above livestock production. This is promising for those implementing SRM, when despite the widespread degraded conditions of the vegetation, other rangeland users often stated that livestock (particularly cattle) were valued more than the land. Where efforts are made towards SRM, the value and importance of improving forage and fodder production -as the foundation of animal production -should be seen as the number one priority.Providing water for livestock and people: Water availability for livestock improved in 20% of the cases, and mainly in those cases where it was specifically targeted (Figure 4.22). These included a number of technologies under 'enabled mobility', 'infrastructure improvement' and 'controlled grazing'.Boreholes, water pans (excavated earthen reservoirs) and small dams are common features of many Sub-Saharan African rangelands. But a relatively new development is that vast areas of rangeland, previously utilised only seasonally by domestic livestock, are now accessible year-round as a result of the expansion of borehole technologies (Le Houerou 1989, WRMA 2016a, WRMA 2016b). Climate change and associated water scarcity are contributing to a situation where many rangelands are becoming increasingly dependent on boreholes for a greater part of the year. During dry seasons and droughts, large numbers of people and livestock gather around boreholes, available water pans, permanent rivers and wetlands -and also seasonal rivers where, though apparently dry, water is stored in the sand beds and can be tapped (e.g. 'Sand dams, Kenya' 29 ). During these periods, wetlands and floodplains come into use. However, permanent or prolonged availability of water increases pressure on the land as animals can graze in the vicinity for longer. Likewise, poorly sited watering points may increase degradation by encouraging grazing where land would have been better rested.A range of technologies and innovations are available for constructing and improving water pans and small dams. However, these have a limited lifetime if they are not well protected against sedimentation. Good practice includes attention to siting, design of inlets/ silt traps, fencing and barriers to prevent animals from entering the water, and dredging for the removal of sediment -though this latter practice is expensive and a last resort. Dams and pans are very sensitive to management of their catchment area. If the land and its vegetation cover is degraded then the dams and pans will be rapidly degraded in turn. Investment in the catchment area to improve cover, biomass production simultaneously improves long-term water availability. Where water pans and dams can be constructed and managed effectively, these generally supply water at a lower cost than boreholes (Box 4.19).In Burkina Faso 'Permeable rock dams' 30 -which allow water to flow through, while sediment is trapped -serve to restore seriously degraded forest/ rangeland. 4.5: Ecosystem services for production (provisioning), for nature (regulating and supporting) and for people (sociocultural). In bold are issues that are specifically addressed in this chapter (WOCAT Technology Questionnaire 2018).raising the water table in wells and in protecting the bottomlands from sand filling and gully erosion.Changing the types of watering points that are available in rangeland (e.g. from naturally occurring seasonal water pans to boreholes) can give greater control to local rangeland managers. This is because at boreholes they can choose to turn water supplies on and off at different times of the year, whereas pans remain open for anyone to use -free of charge -until they dry up. In Namibia, herders rely on over 50,000 boreholes that tap deep underground aquifers for their water: solar energy has been used for pumping for over 30 years, and between 2001 and 2006, 669 new solar-powered wells were installed (McGahey et al. 2014). It is not only in Southern Africa, but throughout the rangelands of Sub-Saharan Africa, that more and more boreholes are being dug and groundwater tapped (Box 4.20). The recharge of these groundwater aquifers is in most cases not assured, and sinking groundwater levels are commonly reported. The longer-term consequences of this increasing number of boreholes is a growing worry: increased use of groundwater in drylands without knowledge of the recharge rate and the source of water, means that it is unsure for how long these supplies will remain viable and how soon the aquifers, upon which they depend, will be depleted. Yet, as demands on water increase and surface water has become scarcer, more and more groundwater is being tapped especially during drought periods.There is need for operators to manage the water points, and for institutional structures to organise them (Box 4.21). These may involve customary institutions that have evolved in the 28 https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/3880/ 29 https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/3588/ 30 https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/1618/ rangelands according to local traditions (e.g. as described in Tari and Pattison 2014) or, where such structures do not exist, governments may seek to create water user associations. These institutions also require funds to pay for staff time and operational costs. In some cases, these are included in the fees that are paid by the water users.Water productivity: Beef production 'water footprint' studies have shown that industrial livestock systems have a far higher freshwater footprint than livestock raised in extensive grazing systems -meaning they are much less efficient in water use, basically because they use so much grain (itself a 'thirsty' crop) which then has to be converted into meat. Industrial livestock also produce 'grey water', that is dirty wastewater that has to be disposed of; however this is not an issue for rangelands (McGahey et al. 2014). Significantly, Kenya has made the case for evaluating rangeland productivity on the basis of economic productivity per unit of water, rather than per unit of land (Government of Kenya 2017). Analyses of productivity per unit of water tend to demonstrate that extensive rangeland management systems can be highly efficient, compared to other more water-intensive production systems. In many dry and drought-prone areas, productivity per unit of water is more critical than productivity per unit of land -which is less limiting. The impact on services for ecological benefits were little evident from the cases analysed -probably because not all technologies were intended to address the same service, and furthermore, ecological changes usually take time, and are also mainly off-site. The greatest impacts were recorded for downstream siltation, according to almost 25% of the cases, followed by drought (23%), downstream flooding (almost 20%), water availability, reliable and stable downstream flow and fire (about 15%). Some improvements in micro-climates were recorded in 10% of the technologies (Figure 4.22).At Har Buyo water pan in Garba Tula, Kenya, in 2014 the Abaerega (natural resource manager), reported that he used one litre of diesel per day to pump water to a trough. To cover these costs, and any others arising, he collected levies from users as follows: US$ 0.11 (Ksh 10) per camel, US$ 0.03 (Ksh 3) per cow, US$ 0.1 (Ksh 1) per goat or sheep, no charges for peo-ple, donkeys or young livestock (Awuor, 2014). Generic water requirements for animals can be estimated, and used to derive the price paid per unit of volume, and the overall demands of livestock populations (see table below). However, these do not reflect the value of the water, and indeed barely cover the costs of the equipment and energy used to pump it.Box 4.19: Improving the management of Har Buyo pan in Garba Tula, KenyaWorking group on domestic and institutional uses of water and energy, Garba Tula (Ibrahim Jarso). Micro-climate: Importantly, observations and measurements reveal that reduced or improved vegetation and soil cover have a dramatic impact on the micro-climate, as demonstrated in Box 4.22. Soil surface temperature between adjacent sites show a difference of more than 30 °C: thus on a site with about 50% dry grass cover, compared to a site a few meters away with a bare soil surface, the temperature can rise from around 30 to over 60 °C. The extremely hot surface of a bare soil destroys soil life and is a factor in sterility and aridification. The impact and the importance of a favourable microclimate is often underestimated, and unperceived. Favourable micro-climates can lead to improved soil moisture and air humidity, balanced temperature extremes and radiation, and protection against wind damage.Fire risk: Implementation of the SRM technologies also showed negative impacts -as with fire risk (in 9% of cases). More biomass and 'improved' rangeland can increase the risk of spontaneous fire under long dry periods and drought. Further analysis showed that a fire risk increase has been reported from 'range improvement' (e.g. 'Infiltration ditches and ponding banks, Namibia' 31 ; 'Pitting to restore degraded catchment, South Africa' 32 ) and 'supplementary feeding' (e.g. 'Area closure, Ethiopia' 33 , affecting around 15-18% of the cases, due to greater biomass production.Water availability was improved in around 20% of all documented technologies (Figure 4.22), but mainly in the 'enabled mobility' (60%) and the 'infrastructure improvement' (56%) groups. Both of them involve better distribution of water points and/ or water harvesting and surface water management.Coping with gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters: Figure 4.24 shows that more than 35% of the technologies were appraised to be able to cope well or very well with drought, almost 30% with increasing annual temperatures, and 25% with local rainstorms and windstorms. Further analysis showed that 'Enabled mobility' (60%), 'range improvement' (42%) and 'infrastructure improvement' (42%) coped best with drought. In these TGs 'Index based livestock insurance, Kenya' 34 , 'Vallerani trenches, Niger' 35 and 'Indigenous livestock watering, Tanzania' 36 are examples showing different drought coping strategies, respectively. 'Range improvement' technologies were found to tolerate an increase in annual temperature the best, as they create favourable micro-climates through improved soil and vegetation cover.The technologies applied improved the capacity to cope with droughts and water availability (on-site), and protected against downstream flooding and siltation (off-site) -probably as a result of better soil cover and less runoff. Through 'enabled mobility', the effects of drought were mitigated in 60% of the cases in a positive/ very positive way. This technology group has, by far, the best coping mechanism during droughts. This is followed by controlled grazing, where parts of the rangelands are rested to build up fodder and forage reserves for the dry seasons and droughts. High impacts of drought in one year are acknowledged to have significant effects on households' abilities to cope in subsequent years, but SRM practices act in multiple ways to cope with long dry periods and droughts. Investing in the land and its productive capacity are vital in strengthening people's resilience to drought and climatic shocks. Sustaining rangeland water and pasture resources and avoiding the depletion of household assets can help to reduce the needs for large-scale movements of people during droughts. This reduces the risk of situations where very large numbers of people and animals are crowded into areas with little water or food resources to support them.Traditional mechanisms that pastoralists have used to adapt to drought have in many cases have proved no longer effective in many cases. For example, in Ethiopia's pastoral Borana zone, the local institutions that support social safety networks have been weakened by time, compounded by years of cyclical drought. Their place has been filled by external aid and state support schemes -but these are not able to make up for this loss of adaptive capacity (Holden and Shiferaw 2004). Furthermore this has eroded local 'ownership' of the processes.Off-site impacts of land management (downstream and downwind): In water-stressed basins, where water demands for domestic and other needs are increasing, there can be growing competition between livestock and human populations for finite supplies. In many parts of West and East Africa, seasonal floodplains used by pastoralists for grazing and water during dry seasons have been altered by upstream extractions of water for irrigation and hydropower -resulting from the lack of recognition of the seasonal rangeland production systems that would be impacted. Examples include the extensive rangeland systems of Northern Nigeria (Barbier 2011) the Inner Niger delta in Mali (Aich et al. 2016) and parts of Mauritania (Shine and Dunford 2016). A similar situation is potentially developing in Southern Africa also, for example in Namibia where water is extracted from the upstream Okavango river to irrigate maize, while the Okavango is the very river that nourishes the delta floodplains of the Okavango in Botswana (Box 4.23).Water is both an input (cost) of rangeland production, but also an output or service provided to people and animals by naturally occurring wetlands in the extensive open access Ward Adaptation Planning Committees (WAPCs) have dug new boreholes and also improved the management of existing water points. They also added troughs to accommodate more livestock, together with separate taps for domestic water collection and toilets. This has eased congestion, saving time and averting conflicts. As a result, women can use water points more frequently. Women using Yamicha and Urura boreholes in the remote northwest can now fill ten jerrycans (20 litres capacity) each time they visit. If they do this daily, it will cover the minimum needs of 20 litres per person for a household of six, and still leave an additional 80 litres for washing and caring for smallstock.Box 4.21: Improving the management of boreholes in Merti, KenyaParticipatory resource mapping under solar panels in Merti (Caroline King-Okumu).http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17345IIED.pdfThe WAPCs have also improved water quality at both boreholes and water pans. Covering storage cisterns and fencing water pans, for example, has prevented contamination by birds and livestock. Livestock used to wander into unfenced water pans, making the water unfit for human use. Once the water became too dirty even for livestock, the women would abandon the water pans and either buy more water from kiosks or search for it elsewhere. By protecting its quality, humans and livestock have been able to make better use of more of the available water.Pastoralists loading donkeys with water for domestic use at Duma borehole (Jane Kiiru).rangeland management systems. Wetlands buffer water by absorbing flood flows and providing a permanent source of water -and forage -for pastoralists and their livestock, as well as wildlife, during dry seasons and periods of droughts.As with most natural resources in the rangelands many wetlands are subject to increasing pressure. On the one hand, water supply to the wetlands is changing due to increased water abstraction upstream -and the combination of increasing rainfall intensities and land use change is likely to lead to increased flood flows for wetlands to absorb. On the other hand, there is greater use of the water and vegetative biomass, and inadequate recovery time. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence from wetland users but little data regarding change, and impact on wetland resources and their services.Apart from being affected by climate change and greater variability of rainfall, wetlands also have to absorb changes in the upstream land use and its implications on flow and sediment delivery. Also the demand on the wetland resources attracts people, their livestock and the wildlife from far away making monitoring and management of wetlands a real challenge (Box 4.24, see Chapter 2.1.1). Changing the management of the rangeland system can affect the demand for water -for example for inputs to crop production -and also the ability of the system to provide clean water supplies at low cost.In terms of off-site impacts, 25% of the cases coped positively with downstream siltation, almost 20% were able to deal with downstream flooding -which could lead to off-site damage of infrastructure -and 15% showed an improvement in terms of a reliable and stable stream flow regime (Figure 4.22). 'Enabling mobility' and 'controlled grazing' which are mainly managed through livestock and wildlife grazing, did not show any effect on downstream siltation or flooding, in contrast to the other three technology groups. This is surprising, as controlled grazing should improve cover, which would mean a reduction in runoff and soil loss. The reported cases have probably not monitored -or perhaps not even perceived -the impact downstream.High priority questions requiring attention from rangeland managers -in association with researchers -concern the effects of their SRM practices, either individually or collectively, on watershed scale hydrology (George et al. 2011;Box 4.25). Managing rangeland watersheds to deliver improved quality and quantities of water to urban consumers has been identified as a critically important way in which SRM can affect ecosystem services that are of value to people (Goldstein et al. 2011, Gammie andBievre 2015).Two examples demonstrate the enormous differences in the afternoon temperature of surfaces with vegetation cover, and those with bare and exposed soil.Figure 1 shows a location in the highlands of Kenya at 1800 m a.s.l. with perennial grass and tree cover -where surface temperature at 2 pm on clear and sunny days is around 25°C (left).In sharp contrast, closely neighbouring it, is the bare soil of an overgrazed area where the surface temperature is more than double: around 56°C (right). Figure 2 show a similar comparison in the lowlands (800 m.a.s.l.). Here the temperatures rise from around 35°C on patches with about 50% grass and tree cover, to around 43°C on surfaces with 50% dry grass, and up to 63°C on bare soil patches: this latter temperature is as high as that of an exposed gneiss rock surface. This remarkable difference, due to removal of vegetation cover, is clearly detrimental to the health of the land, the livestock and wildlife, and the people (see Boxes 4.12 and 4.18). Considering the extended areas of degraded land with an increased fraction of bare soil, the contribution of land degradation towards global warming would be worthwhile investigating. Water storage in aquifers and base flows in surface waterways provide services that are useful to people, as a consequence of water remaining in the system. SRM practices can affect groundwater recharge and flows through sub-surface, as well as surface, water flows off-site.Increased runoff and erosion on-site (upstream) and resultant altered water flows off-site (downstream) cause floods as well as shortages. Compound disasters of floods and droughts following each other have received considerable attention in many parts of Sub-Saharan Africa. SRM can offer, at least in part, a disaster risk reduction solution.Avoiding downstream sedimentation and pollution of water bodies is another potential positive impact of SRM. Offsite sedimentation is a major concern that is associated with land degradation. In East Africa, significant problems due to sedimentation in the great lakes have been attributed to population pressure and inappropriate land management over many decades, including the pastoral rangelands (Tanaka et al. 2011). This leads to unwanted sediment movement and stream flow changes that mainly affects downstream human communities and natural ecosystems through increased loading of non-point pollutants. Increased sedimentation in the rivers and lakes has many impacts. For example, it alters aquatic habitats and communities, abets the proliferation of algal blooms and the invasive weed, water hyacinth -which in turn has further reduced the amount of dissolved oxygen and contributed to eutrophication.Extreme climatic conditions and drought, combined with overuse of vegetation favour wind erosion, \"sandification\" and moving sand dunes. The consequences are loss of soil but a reduction in quality also, as wind erosion is selective: the finest and most nutrient-rich particles are removed preferentially. Thus in the topsoil that remains, organic matter levels and fertility are reduced. This can, in turn, increase runoff meaning a loss of precious water (in regions that are often water scarce) while simultaneously causing soil erosion.In arid and semi-arid areas, wind erosion results in the displacement of sand from the source and its accumulation and deposition elsewhere. This destination is often near an obstacle -for example buildings, fences, or wind breaks of trees.In the Sahel, sand dune encroachment can lead to loss of agricultural and pastoral land, and threaten villages (Box 2.26). The dunes may form as a result of an increase in wind erosion, but are commonly triggered by formerly stabilised dunes that have become mobile again following the disappearance of vegetation. Dune stabilisation techniques can be: (i) mechanical fixation (fences, hedges, palisades etc.) that stabilises moving sandy masses or blocks, further movement, and/or (ii) biological fixation that comprises the creation of permanent vegetative cover on the dune. Palisades and vegetation furthermore provide shade that, in turn, lowers soil temperatures and maintains organic matter. With increasingly strong winds and accelerated degradation of the natural vegetation growing on sand dunes -a widespread phenomenon at present -it is very likely that the problems caused by shifting dunes will worsen in the future. Techniques to stabilise shifting sand dunes will therefore become more important.From the analysis displayed in Figure 4.22, it was found that technologies with the highest impacts on people were improving SLM/ LD knowledge (56%), improving community institutions (42%), followed by food security (40%), conflict mitigation (36%) and empowerment of disadvantaged groups/ gender equality (21%).The Okavango Kopano Mokoro Community Trust offers opportunities for community-led tourism in the famous Okavango Delta. The aim is to provide affordable game and nature trips with camping at night -to allow more people to enjoy the delta while providing jobs in the impoverished local villages.The trust was legally registered in 1997, and its board members are from the communities themselves. Community-based natural resource management is the overall objective. This includes sustainable utilisation of natural resources through direct participation in managing the environment, animals and plants abundant in the delta. In this way, the trust uses tourism to protect the rich natural resources while deriving a source of income to sustain local livelihoods.Community guides know best how to access and explore the delta during the different seasons. Overnight camping, combined with day and night trips in local Mokoro dugout canoes has become a popular way to experience the tranquillity of the Okavango Delta -at an affordable price. A highlight is gliding silently through the serene landscape -offering a special perspective of the abundant wildlife, and enjoying the beauty and richness of nature in silence. The delta is home to a vast array of wildlife, including elephant, wildebeest, giraffe, zebra and antelope. The local guides know the special spots within the unique Okavango landscape and wildlife. They can rightly claim this is the best way to experience the true, wild, Africa.The benefits don't accrue to a tourist agency but directly to the local community. Many tourists appreciate this concept-and it offers excellent value for money. Community-led tourism offers untapped potential for the use and conservation of rangelands, while simultaneously benefiting local people. It is surely worthy of further attention. Chapter 4 Sustainable Rangeland Management -drivers, impacts and continuous changeResponses in the approaches concerning 'services for people' presented a similar picture to the technologies. In almost 70% of the approaches, positive impacts on knowledge and capacity building were reported (Figure 4.23). This is followed by institutional strengthening (60%), empowerment of disadvantaged groups (59%), food security (53%), conflict mitigation (52%) and gender equality (50%).The importance of SRM knowledge has already been highlighted as a critical constraint to implementation (see Chapter 4.1.7). The second highest impact is related to improving community institutions. It is striking that in some technology groups, the empowerment of community institutions was rated more highly than SLM/LD knowledge: these groups include 'enabled mobility' (of whom 100% cite improved community institutions), 'infrastructure improvement' (82%) and 'controlled grazing' (55%). This confirms the importance of strengthening local institutions in orderIn Sub-Saharan Africa, 4.7% of the surface area is covered by wetlands: this figure rises to 6.0% when lakes, rivers and reservoirs are included (Rebelo et al. 2009). Rivers flowing through the rangelands or draining into wetlands are arteries of life for people, animals -but also for vegetation -especially when surrounded by drylands'. Examples include the River Niger, Senegal, rivers and streams flowing into Lake Chad, the Lorian Swamps in Northern Kenya which drain into Somalia, and the Okavango Delta in Botswana. River flows, and their flow regimes, change from season to season. However a trend towards extremes is being increasingly observed, with higher flows and more violent floods damaging and destabilising river beds and banks and, during the dry season, diminishing flows or water courses drying entirely. Upstream development, especially increasing irrigation, significantly affects river flows in some basins -yet the extent of the impact and the consequences for the rangelands are unclear and contested. Evidence is still lacking though research is underway in some basins, notably the Ewaso Ng'iro Basin in northern Kenya (Providoli et al. 2019) and the Okavango Basin in Southern Africa (Liniger et al. 2017).Box 4.24: Wetlands and Rivers: their key role in the rangelands of SSA areas. Improving gender equality is a real concern in SSA, and it is important to note that good land management has a positive impact. The role of women in decision-making, use, access, ownership and control of rangeland resources differs from that of men (Box 4.27). In practice, women are owners and managers of some natural resources, particularly those situated near homesteads. They may certain specific pastoral products -such as milk. These roles are often well recognised and nested in customary tenure systems, although some beliefs and taboos may not promote an active role of women in sustainable rangeland management: especially those that hinder decision-making by women. In 'FMNR approach, Kenya' 37 women are included in discussions and trainings and are empowered to take decisions although old traditions (\"clean agriculture\") hinder women from planting and working with trees and from participating in meetings.Women clearly hold intrinsic knowledge about rangeland management in line with their use of the range. This knowledge, coupled with skills, management and access to resources, is key to addressing issues of land degradation and climate change. However, it needs to be re-emphasised that these issues impact on women and men differently. For example, the amount of time and effort needed by women to accomplish their traditional roles of (for example) fetching water for domestic use and taking care of sick or lactating livestock can increase very considerably with resource scarcity and degradation.Chapter 4 Sustainable Rangeland Management -drivers, impacts and continuous change to achieve successful implementation of SRM, but also probably highlights the fact that many development agencies are increasingly working through local institutions in the search for long-term sustainability.Food security is being improved in all technologies and approaches groups to almost the same extent (between 40% and 60%). Only in practices under 'supplementary feeding' is the impact on food security said to be much lower: but that could indicate that in this group, people are better-off and food security is not a major concern.Some technologies and apporaches had a positive impact on conflict mitigation (36% and 20-55% repectively). However, 8% of the technologies described were associated with a negative impact. This was mainly within the 'controlled grazing' and the 'range improvement' groups. In both of them, improved grazing land conditions also attract neighbours to invade those \"green spots\", especially during droughts.Land use rights improvement were mentioned in 50% of the approaches -which was lower than expected. Despite the urgency of the need to achieve better land tenure, having a significant impact on land use right issues is evidently both difficult and time-consuming.Empowerment of disadvantaged groups and gender equality were greatly to moderately affected in more than half of the approaches documented: the impact was similar in all approaches groups except in 'marketing & alternative income', where, in all cases, positive impacts were recorded for disadvantaged groups such as ethnic minorities in remoteThe Olifants basin in South Africa is an example where rangeland uses are located upstream. In this basin, a 31.6% decrease in rangeland with matching increases in agriculture lands (20.1%), urban areas (10.5%) and forest (0.7%) led to a 47% increase in surface runoff generation (Gyamfi et al. 2016). The implication is that water was not retained on the land, and higher surface runoff is usually correlated with higher peak flows and sediment losses also. Another example of an African basin where ecological effects have been observed following the loss of upstream rangelands is the Lake Bosomtwe basin in Ghana (Adjei et al. 2017).In the Mara basin, which is shared between Kenya and Tanzania, Mati et al. (2008) found that land-use change between 1973 and 2000, including deforestation and conversion of rangelands to croplands, increased the peak flow of the Mara River by 7%. Mwangi et al. (2016) estimated that land-use change in the last 50 years contributed to about 97% of the observed increase in the mean streamflow of Nyangores River (a headwater tributary of the Mara River). Deforestation and intensification of agriculture are likely to cause an increase in surface runoff due to degradation of the watershed, which reduces its capacity to absorb rainwater (Mwangi et al. 2017).In the Gilgel Tekeze catchment, Northern Ethiopia, major increments of cultivated land and settlements of 15.4% and 9.9%, respectively, at the expense of shrubland and grazing lands have caused an increase in annual surface runoff of 101 mm, and a decrease in groundwater recharge of 39 mm over the period 1976-2003 (Haregeweyn et al. 2015). These results signify an increasing threat of moisture unavailability, and suggest that appropriate land management measures under the framework of the integrated catchment management (ICM) approach are urgently needed.Olifants Basin, Southern Waters (www.drift-eflows.com).Source: http://www.okmct.org.bw/ Lake Bosomtwe basin in Ghana (http://ghana.arocha.org).based NRM'. Main strategies are to establish insurances, to regulate dry season or emergency grazing and to establish fodder reserves and emergency markets.Benefits and costs of rangeland management practices Benefits and costs are crucial in justifying interventions and encouraging adoption of SRM. So far, the majority of available studies on the benefits and costs of SLM concern crop production systems. Far fewer assessments have been devoted to benefits and costs of rangeland management systems (Rota 2018). Frameworks for assessment of the value of dryland ecosystems, and the potential benefits of managing them sustainably have only recently begun to emerge (King-Okumu 2017). Due to the wide extent and diffuse nature of rangeland systems, the broad range of management practices, multiple benefits, variable outcomes and uncertainties (Sandford and Scoones 2006), the benefit/cost calculations are often considerably more complicated and problematic for agricultural economists than the economics of monocropping or agroforestry systems. Furthermore, input requirements and costs are also not as predictable as they are in cropping systems. Nevertheless, it has been argued that the potential returns on restoring rangelands can be higher than those for any other dryland ecosystem type -hence the importance of attempting analyses (IPBES 2018, De Groot et al. 2013).To assess the benefit -cost ratios for the SRM technologies identified in this book, the perspective of land users and/ or other stakeholders of short-term and long-term of establishment and maintenance benefits and costs has been used asThe encroachment of sand dunes particularly affects oases, threatening 9% of the productive land in the oases of Niger. Additionally in the oases and lowlands of the agro-silvo-pastoral zone, sand dune formation and dust bowls threaten 60% of the infrastructure -water points, roads and settlements etc. Sand dunes are stabilised by setting up dead or living windbreaks arranged in a checkerboard pattern or in strips aligned against the prevailing wind direction. The windbreaks are formed by palisades (e.g. from millet stalks, branches of doum palm trees or other plant material) or by hedges (e.g. Euphorbia balsamifera) and trees (Acacia senegal, Balanites aegyptiaca).From an economic point of view, the advantage/ impact of the technology is the increase in agro-silvo-pastoral income, livestock production, straw and pasture production, and fruit production (dates, mangoes, citrus, etc.). Ecologically, the advantages/ impacts are the increase in vegetation cover/ soil fertility, the reduction of wind and water erosion, and an increase in biodiversity. At the socio-cultural level, this technology reduces conflicts between land users and strengthens the institutional capacities of local communities. Use of the Gender Evaluation Criteria: a tool to assess land policies and laws against gender justice.http://www.landcoalition.org/en/regions/africa/blog/gender-evaluationcriteria-key-moment-scaling a proxy indicator. According to WOCAT, short-term covers 1 -3 years, and long-term at least 10 years. Land users were asked their opinions of whether the ratios were positive or negative. Generally, from experience, such assessments place a quite low value on people's time and in-kind investments, and also do not take into consideration the cost of establishing necessary approaches, institutional frameworks, capacities, etc. that the technologies need to be embedded into.Results show that, for the short-term, in all technology groups, more than half of the cases demonstrate positive returns (Figure 4.25). The highest were recorded under 'infrastructure improvement', 'enabled mobility' and 'range improvement'. Compared to the costs involved for establishment, the practices requiring high inputs also show rapid beneficial returns -such as 'infrastructure improvement'. Those needing less input (see Figure 4.14) also give high benefits such as the 'controlled grazing' and 'supplementary feeding' groups.However, establishment costs often exceed short-term benefits, as reported in around 30% of the cases. The most negative benefit/ cost ratio in the first 1 to 3 years are recorded under 'controlled grazing', 'range improvement' and 'supplementary feeding'. 'Infrastructure improvement' showed less negative benefit-cost ratio than expected. In the 'enabled mobility' technology group, benefits already exceed costs in the first years. Here the perceived investment costs are relatively low compared to the other groups, as these are mostly related to a management change. Surprisingly, in around 10% of the 'controlled grazing' group, the returns are rated as being very negative. This could be explained by reduced grazing or even exclusion of grazing in the first few years. 'Rotational grazing, South Africa' 38 has very high establishment costs, which discourages land users from using the multi-paddock grazing system.Long-term, the investment pays back in all technology groups. This is particularly so, and in a very positive way, for 'infrastructure improvement', 'and 'range improvement' both of which need time (10 years or more) to fully manifest their benefits.In terms of maintenance returns (benefit-cost ratio), in the short-term as well as the long-term, there is a similar pattern to establishment returns. One exception is the 'enabling mobility group', where long-term maintenance benefits are perceived as less positive than long-term establishment benefits, probably due to a withdrawal of support after 3-5 years of project duration. Furthermore, in a few cases of 'range improvement', long-term maintenance returns are rated slightly negative, probably due to less financial support for inputs and repairs after projects pull out.SRM should aim, ideally, to achieve both short-term (rapid) and long-term (sustained) paybacks. Practices (technologies and approaches), as documented by WOCAT, include a majority, and other disasters (Flint and Luloff 2005, Bond et al. 2017, Venton 2018). It also includes consideration of the value that managers place on avoiding, or insuring against, these risks and losses. Since the loss of livelihoods in marginal rangeland areas cause famines and conflicts, this can have disastrous consequences for national economies, security, and for society as a whole. Recognition of this point has important implications not only for the selection of optimal management strategies, but also for economic assessment of their benefits. Although most available assessments of benefits and costs of interventions to build resilience to drought in rangeland areas focus on the household level economies, some do also consider effects on the wider regional and national economies or even global environmental benefits, such as carbon sequestration (Vardakoulias and Nicholles 2014a and 2014b, Siedenburg 2016, Venton 2018). A recent assessment by FAO (2018) demonstrated that giving livestock owners fodder for their animals during drought saved lives and achieved a 3.5:1 return on investment costs to procure and distribute the fodder. But if rangeland users were better able to protect forage resources -or make hay -they could achieve the same outcome in terms of avoiding livestock losses. In such cases, their coping systems are also strengthened, and they would not be dependent on handouts.Recently, rangeland managers have begun to consider the need to involve off-site as well as on-site stakeholders in shaping their assessments of SRM impacts (Tanaka et al. 2011, Brown andMacleod 2017). In cases where some benefits are of more value to off-site stakeholders than they are to on-site resource users, there can be rationale for the off-site beneficiaries to offer incentives to the rangeland users for maintaining or improving relevant practices -for which report high returns anticipated over longer (10-year) timeframes (Table 4.6). Even in the short-term, slightly positive to very positive returns are common. Generally, the move towards more positive returns in the long-term is reflected.In relation to rangeland use systems, and also the technology groups, no distinct patterns emerge.However, it is important to note that assessments of ecological restoration often deal in much longer timeframes than this, that is 25-or 30-year time horizons (e.g. IPBES 2018).Valuation of ecosystem services is important to enable economic assessment of the benefits of SRM, in order to weigh these against the costs of implementation (see Figure 4 The economics of risk reduction and improved resilience in the rangelands is an emerging field in which particular attention is paid to the costs of losses due to drought Short term: 1 -3 years; long term: 10 years Balana et al. 2012). Drinking water for people and livestock often has a range of different market prices that will escalate during shortages. The majority of available studies on the benefits and costs of SLM concern crop production systems. Far fewer assessments have been devoted to benefits and costs of rangeland management systems. Due to the multiple benefits and uncertainties that characterise the rangeland systems, these calculations are often considerably more complicated and problematic for agricultural economists than the economics of monocropping or agroforestry systems.The economics of carbon sequestration is often discussed in relation to the economics of sustainable rangeland management and payment for ecosystem ser vices (Box 4.28). But these values still can only be realised in very few rangelands in SSA -where there is sufficient institutional support to make payments for carbon credits (Lipper et al. 2010).On the other hand, the economics of land claims and mining rights (subterranean resource exploitation) can be more tangible to rangeland users -even under communal systems. Rangeland communities can receive payments from mineral exploration, and land developers of different kinds if they can establish their claim on their land and oblige investors to pay for the rights to access resources there.There are more issues and benefits involved related to sustainable land management as illustrated in Figure 4.26. Each of them would need to be assessed and valued, and trade-offs and co-benefits between them to be assessed, in order to paint a comprehensive picture of the value of rangeland management.Chapter 4Sustainable Rangeland Management -drivers, impacts and continuous changeThe Chyulu Hills REDD+ project combines two government agencies, three local NGOs and four communities together under a unified banner, the Chyulu Hills Conservation Trust (CHCT). The project aims to protect its rangeland and forest landscapes by creating an alternative income opportunity, and improving both livestock and rangeland management, while preventing the emission of over 18 million tons of carbon dioxide over the project's 30-year lifetime.A main goal of the project is to improve grazing and livestock management to prevent further degradation of the rangeland and forest resources. example to reduce erosion and sedimentation of downstream water supplies or increase carbon sequestration (Blignaut et al. 2010). This is a form of payment for ecosystem services (PES).The economics of hydrological regulation is difficult to assess in terms of use values for the stored water, or replacement costs for wells or water treatment instead of water availability in the surface waterbodies and near subsurface. This has been attempted in various studies carried out in rangeland areas in different parts of Sub-Saharan Africa (Acharya and Barbier 2002, Blignaut et al. 2010,The influence of SRM on ecosystem services can include both on-site and offsite impacts.Where efforts are made towards SRM, the value and importance of improving forage and fodder production -as the foundation of animal production -should be seen as the number one priority.Climate change and associated water scarcity are contributing to a situation where many rangelands are becoming increasingly dependent on boreholes for a greater part of the year.Dams, pans and lakes are very sensitive to management of their catchment area. If the land and its vegetation cover is degraded then the waterbodies will be rapidly degraded in turn.Changing the types of watering points that are available in rangeland (e.g. from naturally occurring seasonal water pans to boreholes) can give more control to local rangeland managers.As demands on water increase and surface water has become scarcer, more and more groundwater is being tapped especially during drought periods -the longer-term consequences of this is a growing worry.Beef production 'water footprint' studies have shown that industrial livestock systems have a far higher freshwater footprint than livestock raised in extensive grazing systems.More than 35% of the technologies were appraised as being able to cope well or very well with drought.Investing in the land and its productive capacity are vital in strengthening people's resilience to drought and climatic shocks.Managing rangeland watersheds to deliver improved quality and quantities of water to urban consumers has been identified as a critically important way in which SRM can affect ecosystem services that are of value to people.Compound disasters of floods and droughts following each other have received considerable attention in many parts of Sub-Saharan Africa. SRM can offer, at least in part, a disaster risk reduction solution.The costs showed that they are affordable and already pay back in the short-term: so rangeland users can spontaneously adopt these practices. 'Controlled grazing' also has good adoption rates -in around 35% of the cases, with more than 50% adoption in some. Again, the reasons are that they are affordable and pay back quickly. In all the other technology groups, adoption is less, but it still exists. In these cases more inputs are required, especially 'improved infrastructure' and thus rely more on support from outside agencies. However, the high proportion of 'not available' data on adoption is an indication of insufficient monitoring of the spread and takeup of land management technologies.Further analysis showed that only 25% of the cases reported adaptation of the technologies by land users to suit local context and changing conditions: about the same number indicated no adaptation and almost half did not, or simply could not, answer the question. Of those who adapted the practice, 13% indicated climate change, 3% market change but 84% could not specify the reason. The high number of 'no replies' to critical questions like adoption and adaption rises serious concerns about monitoring and evaluation of the spread of SRM.Ecosystem services (ESS) provided from rangeland management, and the changes due to investments in sustainable land management practices, influence and change the original drivers of the management of the rangeland. This feedback mechanism closes the cycle in the framework of sustainable rangeland management (see Figure 4.1). New drivers are formed, which in turn drive land users to make changes and further investments, or to maintain the services provided by the land use. Thus assessment of the impacts on ESS shows how drivers are changed, creating the enabling environment ideally towards improved conditions for further spread ('outscaling') of SRM practices.The main motivation of land users for implementing SRM has been reported to be increased production (Figure 4.27).Along the same lines, increased profitability is mentioned as being very important under a number of approaches.Reducing land degradation and environmental consciousness are also driving forces or at least strongly motivating factors. Enhanced SRM knowledge and skills, as well as conflict mitigation, are recurring themes throughout this chapter, indicating their importance as a driving force.Activities from the 'community based NRM' group can all be fully sustained or continued once any external project support has been terminated or has pulled out (Figure 4.28).For around 70% of the 'land & water use planning' cases and 50% of those under 'wildlife & nature tourism' continuation of implementation of activities has also been reported. However, for around 80% of the cases of 'marketing & alternative income' and around 30% of 'land & water use planning', continuation is unlikely or even impossible without the support of a project or government agency.With respect to take-up of the practices, 40% of the cases reported spontaneous adoption. Adoption of technologies pertaining to the 'enabled mobility' group are by far the highest (Figure 4.29). Forty percent of the cases reported that 10-50% of the land users have adopted the technologies, and 60% of all cases reported an adoption rate of more than half of the land users within the region. This is a very encouraging sign and shows that practices promoted under 'enabled mobility' are first, clearly needed, and second, attractive.Women clearly hold intrinsic knowledge about rangeland management in line with their use of the range.So far, the majority of available studies on the benefits and costs of SLM concern crop production systems. Far fewer assessments have been devoted to benefits and costs of rangeland management systems.Results show that, for the short-term, in all technology groups, more than half of the cases demonstrate positive returns.Long-term, the investment pays back in all technology groups. In terms of maintenance returns, in the short-term as well as the long-term, there is a similar pattern to establishment returns.In some cases, long-term maintenance returns are rated less positive than longterm establishment benefits, probably due to a withdrawal of support after 3-5 years of project duration.If rangeland users were better able to protect forage resources -or make hay -they could avoid livestock losses.Recently, rangeland managers have begun to consider the need to involve off-site as well as on-site stakeholders in shaping their assessments of SRM impacts. Closing the cycle in rangeland management: Technical interventions in rangelands will fail if impacts on the economic, political, cultural and social well-being and the people, and the health of the land and ecosystem are not positive and not recognised. Rangelands are complex socio-ecological systems.Many factors are localised in nature, and can only be tackled through an appropriate and tailored approach. Others are relevant at landscape, or national, or even transboundary scale and others at global level: their effects on the functioning of the rangeland system may be out of the control of local managers, yet interventions must account for these to ensure success (Hruska et al. 2017). The proposed 'rangeland management framework' on drivers, land management practices, health of the land resources and ESS -including human wellbeing -allows manager and practitioners to understand and interpret these interacting factors, and create management intervention that are holistic in nature, and recognise the complexity and dynamic interaction in rangelands.Rangeland management involves actions at multiple scales, both temporal and spatial. Management interventions which don't appreciate the need to manage across these multiple scales, incorporating the varying political, ecological and social dynamics, will often fail to meet their goals.The analysis of the documented practices, as well as experiences described in the literature, clearly show that there is a continuous change of drivers. It is the land management practices and their impacts on the health of the natural resources and the ecosystem services, which influence and propel the change of drivers. This ever-ongoing change, namely \"what is good today might not work tomorrow\" combined with the intricate complexity related to ecosystems, stakeholders and their interactions is particularly dynamic. It has even accelerated in recent years and is increasingly challenging for the rangelands of Sub-Saharan Africa. Highly flexible adaptions and coping mechanism are clearly needed, as indicated by the strong demand for knowledge and capacity building expressed by land users -echoed by SRM specialists. Take-home messages Adoption of technologies are by far the highest within the 'enabled mobility' groupThe high number of 'no replies' to critical questions like adoption and adaption rises serious concerns about monitoring and evaluation of the spread of SRM.Technical interventions in rangelands will fail if impacts on the economic, political, cultural and social well-being and the people, and the health of the land and ecosystem are not positive and not recognised.Rangeland management involves actions at multiple scales, both temporal and spatial.It is the land management practices and their impacts on the health of the natural resources and the ecosystem services, which influence and propel the change of drivers ever-ongoing change, namely \"what is good today might not work tomorrow\" combined with the intricate complexity related to ecosystems, stakeholders and their interactions is particularly dynamic.Highly flexible adaptions and coping mechanism are clearly needed, as indicated by the strong demand for knowledge and capacity building expressed by land users -echoed by SRM specialists.ing by urban elites etc.; growing conflicts between resource users; a plethora of historical development projects -many of which failed and left a legacy of pessimism. Management interventions which don't appreciate the need to manage across multiple scales, incorporating the varying political, ecological and social dynamics, will fail to meet their goals.Rangelands have become hotspots as their potential is better appreciated -but at the same time they are subject to increasing threats of degradation.A main aim of rangeland development is to achieve improved and sustained ecosystem services and provide better livelihoods by investment in, and upscaling of sustainable rangeland management (SRM) profoundly based on experiences gained so far. Better management of the vegetation, the water and the soil must be afforded top priority for planning and further investments -for the future of the Sub-Saharan Africa's rangelands and its peoples.The way forward -strengthening sustainable rangeland management in Sub-Saharan AfricaThis chapter brings the book to a conclusion by synthesising and integrating the findings of the literature review and analysis of the case studies. These are assembled under the thematic headings of technologies, approaches and knowledge management. A final section then reviews the prospects for the future of sustainable rangeland management.Within the text there are \"Focus boxes\" -each of which highlights key issues or summarises guidelines. In summary, the conclusion underlines the conviction that there needs to be a greater emphasis on the rangelands and their management in Sub-Saharan Africa.But first, it is important to re-iterate the strategic importance of the rangelands to Sub-Saharan Africa. They cover 62% of the land area, are home to over 55% of its livestock and provide livelihoods for 38% of the region's inhabitants. Rangelands also provide a wide range of ecosystems services including carbon storage and hydrological regulation -and they also host unique and globally important biodiversity. However, the state of these lands is in peril, with large-scale losses of productivity and threats to livelihoods, due to pervasive deterioration of the natural resources -increasingly exacerbated by climate change and growing demands by various stakeholders.A multitude of different drivers are involved in the current dynamic situation, all impacting and affecting rangelands and their management: these include human population growth and increasingly unsustainable resource use; in some areas, growing livestock densities and changing livestock composition; climate change with increased frequency of droughts and floods; losses of mobility as a result of policies and land fragmentation; increasing claims on resources -for mining, oil exploration, biofuels, large-scale farming, contract herd-What is the future of the rangelands in SSA? Transformation into other land uses due to growing alternative claims? Will an assessment of the value of the diverse services and functions of the rangelands help in clarifying the way forward? left: Conversion of rangelands and their wetlands might yield shortterm economic benefits but a loss of services related to disaster risk reduction, biodiversity and provision of water, northern Uganda (Hanspeter Liniger).right: Assessing the value of biodiversity and rich habitats of African wildlife -and the value of grasses, in some parts of the world termed \"green gold\" -remains a challenge compared to assessing the value of mining mineral resources e.g. gold, South Africa (Hanspeter Liniger).Focus #02: Review rangelands as social-ecological systems.Development interventions in rangelands fail when we do not consider impacts on economic and social well-being, in addition to the ecology. Rangelands are complex social-ecological systems where climate, ecology, management, culture, institutions, policy, and market forces, all interact. Rangeland interventions thus need to address all aspects of sustainability: the social, economic and ecological dimensions of sustainable rangeland management.Focus #03: Appreciate new and growing pressures and their significant impact.Rangelands are under intense and growing pressure, with a multitude of global and local changes. Land degradation is a clear and present danger. Simultaneously, historical views of rangelands and their people as \"marginal\" are rapidly receding: these are lands growing steadily and strongly in importance as claims on them, for multiple purposes, proliferate.Focus #01: Appreciate the importance of healthy rangelands in Sub-Saharan AfricaFor the future of Sub-Saharan Africa, rangelands and their ecosystem services will be increasingly crucial: but their contribution can only be guaranteed if the land and its resources are kept in a \"healthy\" condition through sustainable management.The first priority behind sound SRM technologies -valid for all rangeland use systems -is to seek to establish and maintain healthy land. Nurturing productive conditions helps land to achieve its natural potential, while maintaining and improving ecosystem function and services. Furthermore, it breaks the vicious spiral of degradation (see Box 4.12). It also provides resilience against shocks and extremes inherent to rangelands, but made worse by a changing climate (see Chapter 2.1.2). The combination of improving and maintaining both health and productivity of the land has top priority for all interventions in SRM.Healthy rangeland can only be fostered by practices that maintain a good level of ground cover -with a special emphasis on perennial grasses, including the improvement of forage/ fodder quality: the nutritional value of the range needs to be considered alongside the productivity. Therefore, what is urgently needed is a \"GRASS revolution\": Grass Restoration for Africa's Sub-Saharan rangelands. As this revolution is also needed outside Africa it could also stand for Grass Restoration for Arid and Semiarid Soils. This helps achieve the objective of increasing vegetation/ biomass quality and production, which in turn increases water availability and water use efficiency by reducing surface evaporation and runoff. Collected runoff can be used productively through water harvesting.Other goals are an increase in soil fertility, in soil organic matter, and in soil fauna and flora and creating favourable micro-climates, SRM technologies that favour healthy land are based on grazing management systems at very different levels of scale -across all rangeland use systems (RUS). However, when working effectively, all provide rest periods for grasses to replenish their reserves. Judicious fire management may be employed in some situations to prevent or control bush and tree encroachment by invasive exotic -but also native -species and allow perennial grasses to establish.Because of the high level of diversity and the heterogeneity of the rangelands, there needs to be a differentiation in focus between the different rangeland use systems (RUS). Although there can be overlap between the different RUS, each requires specific interventions.Experiences with sustainable rangeland management have been documented using the standardised WOCAT format, and are presented in Part 2 under \"technologies\" and \"approaches\". The analysis of the practices documented revealed principles underpinning successful SRM. Some are valid for all rangeland use systems -others are more specific to certain systems.Focus #05: Address different rangeland use systems (RUS).In order to deal with the high complexity and diversity, six rangeland use systems need to be addressed -separately but also the interactions between them -in the search for solutions, these comprise:1. Large landscape pastoral rangelands (pastoral).2. Large landscape agropastoral rangelands (agropastoral).3. Bounded rangelands without wildlife management (bounded without wildlife).4. Bounded rangelands with wildlife management (bounded with wildlife).6. Small-scale settled pastures (pastures).Focus #06: Follow three guiding principles for SRM technologies.1) Maintain healthy and productive land.2) Employ adaptive and ecological heterogeneity-based management of livestock and wildlife.3) Focus on resilience-based interventions that cope with shocks, threats and risks.Focus #07: Emphasize Grass Restoration for Africa's Sub-Saharan rangelands, GRASS.A popular misconception is that deforestation is a major issue in the rangeland crescent of SSA. For donors, trees have \"green credentials\", and a simple appeal. However a focus on tree planting programmes should not detract from the main priority: re-establishing perennial grass cover and species for herbivores -and for protection of the land.Focus #04: Spread SRM derived from experience.To ensure relevance, impact and spread, SRM must be based on principles derived from the wealth of existing experiences. This book has collected and collated many of the most important current practices: the evidence is here.nah and grassland plant communities. There is now a strong conceptual basis for wildlife-livestock co-existence and empirical evidence to show that these concepts work.Thus community and private conservancies can play a role in restoring wildlife movement across large landscapes in African savannahs. But conservancies are not a panacea for development in the rangelands and cannot replace public institutions that function at a broader spatial level.As noted, good rangeland management practices lead to healthy landscapes which build up resilience and make systems \"climate-smart\" -namely productive and more robust to climate extremes and changes, while simultaneously sequestering carbon in vegetation and the soil. Further, specific measures include installing emergency mechanisms for situations where the shock is too large to be absorbed by even a healthy system. This may include securing additional emergency feed by building up a hay reserve (e.g. in 'pasture' but also in 'bounded' systems) or securing an emergency grazing area -though such areas are very vulnerable to competition and conflicts. Another key aspect of this strategy is sourcing emergency markets: possibilities for sale and slaughter during critical periods. Finally contingency plans should be drawn up in case of exceptional droughts or other disasters where food (or cash) aid is required: in these cases the World Food Programme may step in and propose \"work-for-asset\" programmes where the \"assets\" comprise infrastructure for community benefit.Enabling mobility and movement through opportunistic (large-scale pastoral and agropastoral systems), or controlled, rotational grazing (in bounded systems) allowing natural regeneration and resting periods is central to utilising heterogeneity in vegetation and climate.The key elements are grazing intensity, timing and pressure that need to be carefully -and opportunistically -adjusted in order to allow the grass and herbaceous cover to regenerate from use and to remain productive. It is of paramount importance to guarantee sufficient duration and regularity of resting periods to maintain rangeland health. Rangelands evolved with a wide range of different herbivores. However, land users -through selecting different livestock species with their specific browsing and grazing habits -have changed the composition of rangeland vegetation.A vital intervention is to improve infrastructure including the number and distribution of water points and reservoirs. The key here is strategic placement to regulate water availability at different periods. Markets and slaughterhouses are always important -but access is imperative when lengthy droughts occur. Another area of attention is adjusting the balance between grazing and browsing: the mix between types of livestock, or in combination with wildlife.Wildlife and biodiversity should be seen as an opportunity rather than an obstacle. Many systems can benefit from wildlife for more efficient use of vegetative resources, for tourism and income generation for game meat. Furthermore, new strategies are needed to integrate pastoral and conservation objectives. Pastoralists can create \"functional heterogeneity\" that facilitates co-existence of wildlife and livestock and the interrelation of their grazing with savan-Chapter 5The way forward -strengthening sustainable rangeland management in Sub-Saharan AfricaLeft: Large-scale restoration grass cover is a key, if not the key, challenge for the rangelands in Sub-Saharan Africa (Hanspeter Liniger).right: Clearing of invasive bushes and spreading their branches on the bare ground enables grasses to grow under the cover, due to the favourable microclimate and the activities of termites breaking the soil crust, near Johannesburg, South Africa (Hanspeter Liniger).Focus #08: Maintain healthy and productive land.• Improve and maintain grass and herbaceous cover for production and protection.• Increase water availability by reducing water loss from direct evaporation from the surface and by uncontrolled runoff; harvest runoff water for productive purposes.• Maintain and increase soil fertility by reduction of water and wind erosion and improved manure management.• Reduce or prevent encroachment of invasive bush and tree species.Focus #09: Employ adaptive and ecological heterogeneity-based management of livestock and wildlife.• Adjust grazing intensity, timing and pressure by movement of livestock.• Allow regular resting periods for productive regeneration.• Select livestock species and composition according to availability and change of the rangeland vegetation.• Improve number and distribution of water points to access diverse grazing lands.• Give attention to markets and slaughterhouses: location and accessibility especially during droughts.• Manipulate herd composition (grazers and browsers; largestock and smallstock) to make use of the heterogeneity.• Manage livestock and wildlife interaction.• Arrangements with neighbours are needed to agree on dry season/ drought forage. • Securing the rested areas from use or invasion is essential; this also helps to ensure enough dry season/ drought forage. • Because of pressure from other rangeland users and drought, additional strategies may be required, such as emergency markets.• Improved land is directly addressed through restoring grass cover e.g. by reseeding, water conservation and harvesting, clearing of invasive and unproductive species. • As with 'controlled grazing' the rights and security over the land in times of crisis (droughts etc.) is a major issue. Range improvements are often done under 'bounded' or 'pasture' systems, where land rights are firmly regulated.• The impact on the land and its health is restricted in area but where applied, it is usually well done and productivity is improved. • Resilience to shocks and emergency feeding is usually better prepared for than in other groups. • In more intensive systems for animals at particularly stages (young, gravid, lactating), feed is often from residues, or fodder -fresh or preserved as hay.• Water availability is effectively a grazing management tool: water and forage access go hand-in-hand. Areas without water may be underutilised. When water points dry -or are turned off -animals are obliged to move: this helps to introduce resilience into the system. • However, this group also has the greatest potential to accelerate degradation especially in the vicinity of infrastructure through prolonging access to water and thus forage. Specific management options are needed (e.g. the movement of corrals, temporary closure of water points, change of stock routes). Development of water resources and its management must be designed carefully to avoid this pitfall. • Emergency situations can be addressed through infrastructure (stock routes for example) that permits ready access to forage, and through improved market opportunities.Diversifying production and sources of income is another option -though not available to all, for example those systems characterised by opportunistic movement and transhumance. Diversification can include using wildlife and tourism for additional income: this is an opportunity for two RUS, namely 'bounded with wildlife' and 'parks'. Other diversification pathways may include expansion of agropastoral and settled pasture systems, though this is limited by climatic factors. Non-livestock rangeland products (e.g. honey, medicinal and cosmetic products) are an option for exploitation, to a greater or lesser extent, under all RUS. An option for the future could be acquiring carbon credits for sequestering carbon under climate change mitigation programmes -for example as is being pioneered in the Chyulu Hills of Kenya.Whereas all the three principles elaborated above have their potential and role in the different groups of technologies, some of them have a special emphasis in particular technology groups:Enabled mobility (TG1)• Incorporates the principles of reaching a healthy state by avoiding overuse through movement and providing rest periods, while exploiting gradients of forage quality and quantity. Has best potential to exploit rainfall variability. • Requires strong governance systems to ensure adherence to grazing rules and arrangements. • Even though mobility has high potential to cope with shocks and variability, access to emergency areas and emergency markets is a growing constraint.• Smaller-scale form of mobility: rotation and regular resting is a key principle to avoid detrimental impacts on vegetation of non-rotational regimes.Focus #10: Focus on resilience-based interventions that cope with shocks, threats and risks.• Adapt through becoming resilient: invest in climate-smart systems.• Install emergency mechanisms for feed and market access.• Diversify production and sources of income (tourism/ wildlife, non-livestock rangeland products).• Be prepared for disaster interventions: develop plans for disaster relief programmes.Clarification and communication of the potential benefits and the impact on land users' livelihoods for each of the SRM practices are a prerequisite to encourage adoption of SRM. There needs to be particular attention to gender and youth.The following are the main considerations:In order to facilitate the implementation of SRM technologies six guiding basic principles for successful SRM approaches are:An enabling environment constitutes the factors that support or \"surround\" the implementation of SRM practices. Many are out of the direct control of project or programme implementers -such as as national policies. Some, though, are closer to home such as the development of local rangeland management committees. Before selection of an SRM practice, an analysis of the \"hindering environment\" and how to turn it into an \"enabling environment\" is a must. This requires attention to the following issues:left: Local people sowing indigenous trees, shrubs and grass seeds in microbasins opened up by the Vallerani Delfino plough into a extended degraded area. Sowing days are important and joyful events for the communities, Oudalan, Gorom-Gorom, Burkina Faso (Lindo Grandi).centre: During the rainy season the microbasins collect rain and runoff and the grasses re-establish quickly and first cover the microbasins while the unploughed soil remains bare (Amadou Boureima).right: After five years in the same area, the grass cover also between the ploughed lines is almost closed and desirable trees and bushes establish. The area has changed from basically unproductive degraded land to high value pasture land (Verena Grandi).Focus #11: Follow guiding principles for SRM approaches.1) Improve the enabling environment.2) Consider livelihoods, gender and youth.3) Enhance planning through participation and evidencebased decision-making. Focus #12: Improve the enabling environment.• Improve and utilise legal frameworks, institutions, governance, and policies.• Ensure security of rights to land and resources (formal, informal or customary).• Assure financial resources are available to support SRM.• Ensure better knowledge and capacities for decisionmaking and implementation.• Includie social/ cultural/religious norms & values as part of an enlightened approach.Focus #13: Consider livelihoods, gender and youth.• Clarify impact of SRM technologies on the land (vegetation, soil, water) and implications for livelihoods.• Reduce out-migration by promoting profitable and productive SRM.• Calculate costs and inputs needed for the implementation of SRM.• Estimate overall benefits as well as trade-offs: short-term and long-term.• Weigh up the potential for additional income through diversification of activities.• Improve access to services• Consider gender-related differences related to technologies and livelihood.• Assess the relevance to the youth: some '\"high-tech\" options may appeal to them.• Analyse consequences of different technologies on risks and security.Better marketing of livestock, and high-end livestock products as well as branding and origin-labelling can help in adding value to products. Additionally, there is unexploited potential for marketing of non-livestock rangeland products -and finally the potential for carbon credit schemes based not on trees but on rangeland vegetation.These are summarised below.Wildlife, and its role, is controversial within the debate surrounding rangeland management. Some see new opportunities for mixing wildlife and livestock, others view wildlife as a threat to livestock production. There are rangeland users who are caught up in wildlife-livestock or humanwildlife conflicts, while others make profitable use of wildlife and protected areas. Those growing crops on the rangeland fringes are especially vulnerable to wildlife: here lies the greatest potential for conflict. Below, some of the main issues are summarised.Multi-use with multi-users at multi-scales in a world of multiple claims is a great challenge that has to be met while planning. To turn a barrier into an opportunity, the following issues must be considered:Droughts and their implications for the rangelands have been identified as a key, and sensitive issue for all rangelands use systems and SRM practices. While resilience has already been discussed in terms of appropriate technologies, resilience strategy is integral to sound approaches:Focus #15: Build in strategic resilience to drought/ shocks and climate change adaptation.• Select and implement SRM practices that have proven levels of resilience.• Establish drought risk management plans and strategies.• Facilitate establishment of fodder stock and storage.• Enable access to dry season/drought/ emergency grazing grounds and water points.• Set-up early warning systems for preparedness.• Facilitate \"fair/ honest trading\" emergency selling.• Establish insurance schemes where this is an option.• Manage a range of livestock and wildlife species for optimum use of land's resource.• Encourage breeding strategies and natural selection which favour resilience.Focus #14: Enhance planning through participation and evidence-based decision-making.• Tap the wealth of experiences in good rangeland management and the lessons learnt from mistakes.• Assess costs and benefits of different land management options.• Identify and negotiate multiple claims, functions and uses of rangelands involving all stakeholders.• Engage in open dialogue and develop consensus during negotiations.• Plan for conflict resolution; if resolution is required, full stakeholder involvement is best.• Involve multiple stakeholder and users at all stages from planning onwards.Focus #16: Improve marketing and labelling products.• Improve marketing of livestock: high-end products, branding and origin-labelling.• Explore non-livestock rangeland products: medicines, cosmetics etc.• Establish functioning carbon credit schemes for rangelands.Focus #17: Integrate wildlife.• Continue exploring benefits and potentials of integrating wildlife.• Reduce human-wildlife conflicts and identify if wildlife corridors are feasible options.• Seek new opportunities and philosophies to incorporate wildlife and protected area benefits for local people.• Further explore a 3-circle approach often promoted in parks: from (1) protected areas in the centre, to a middle ring (2) for livestock grazing, and an outer ring (3) for settlement/ cultivation.• Further identify and document SRM practices related to parks & reserves and identify their potential for outscaling, especially in West Africa.paradoxes: for example bush encroachment is considered a form of degradation, but management systems with camels and goats may benefit -and herders may respond by increasing the proportion of browsers in their herds.For poor families both goats and sheep can be readily sold to realise cash. Cattle are large, so less of a \"liquid\" asset than small stock. In fact some communities refer to sheep and goats as their \"ATM cash machines\".Wildlife & nature tourism (AG4) Some of the rangeland use systems combine wildlife and nature resource management: for example 'bounded with wildlife' and 'parks & reserves'. The unique wildlife and nature of the African rangelands is a key asset and offers possibility and potential in many ways for improved management.The approach is strongly linked to improved marketing and seeking alternative income sources. The rich biodiversity and unique attractiveness of the rangelands provide a great asset for improved marketing and livelihoods of rangeland users.Clearly, there are a series of important and crucial awareness and knowledge gaps surrounding rangelands and their management. The compilation of the guidelines has been a stark reminder of how little is known, or understood, about the complexity and multitude of factors.Heightened awareness is needed to ensure that recognition of the status of rangelands and the changing and growing claims on them for the services they provide by a multitude of users is enhanced, and a general shift in perception about rangelands potential is encouraged -to reflect their growing importance yet increasing vulnerability.Chapter 5The way forward -strengthening sustainable rangeland management in Sub-Saharan Africa Chapter 5The way forward -strengthening sustainable rangeland management in Sub-Saharan Africa left: Hawai Gufu, a community member from Badana Village makes her contribution in community consultation meeting, Garbatulla, Kenya (Hussein Konsolle).centre: Herero pastoralist planning meeting, Namibia (William Critchley).right: Livestock insurance in remote rangelands illustrates the importance of risk reduction by an insurance against extreme events link droughts or ourbreaks of diseases. The insurance is as important as the basic goods sold in a small shop in the remote north of Kenya (Hanspeter Liniger).Whereas all the six principles elaborated above have their potential and role in the different groups of approaches, some have a special emphasis in particular approach groups:The main concern is to build from the community level, involving land users and their initiatives from the beginning to the end. It stresses participatory planning and decisionmaking and identification of community-based traditions, innovations and adaptations, and mobilises a wide span of stakeholders from community-based organisations (CBOs), to non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to the government (GOs), and international organisations.Land & water use planning (AG2) Particular emphasis is on evidence-based decision-making informing participatory planning: as this has been identified as one of the key shortcomings, leading to widespread failures of interventions. Planning involves another set of \"multi-challenges\" involved in success: multi-stakeholders, multi-functions and multi-levels of scale. It also builds up a strong, well-informed knowledge base covering SRM already applied in the region. This is a real challenge, but approaches addressing improved planning and knowledgebased decision-making surely speak to a core issue within successful implementation of urgently needed SRM. Furthermore, planning for in-built resilience to deal with shocks and extremes has an important role in this group.All approaches need to address the economics of land degradation and SRM. The group 'marketing & alternative income' is focussed on efforts to identify improved marketing of livestock and non-livestock products, improved labelling and value-addition to rangeland products, and synergies including marketing of wildlife and nature, and exploring the potential carbon credits for CC mitigation.The choice of livestock breeds in management systems with restricted mobility is generally fine-tuned to meet market demands. While the herd composition in sedentary systems on rangelands is mainly adjusted to market demands, the composition of herds in pastoral systems further needs to consider type and availability of forage vegetation in an area as supplementary feeding is limited. In turn, changing herd composition may influence, over a long period, plant composition. There are complex dynamics and even Focus #18: Follow the guiding principles: awareness, knowledge & capacity.1) Improve awareness to induce a shift in perception.2) Identify current and future knowledge gaps.3) Address knowledge gaps and improve knowledge management and at all levels.4) Enhance capacity throughout: from land users to decisionmakers.While it is true that policies and governance are a limiting factor, ignorance of specific aspects, including impacts of interventions and indeed how to use previous experiences is a basic bottleneck to implementation of SRM.WOCAT tools and methods are already available, and are being increasingly applied to further elaborate the database and fill current knowledge gaps. In order to enhance the sharing and use of the existing knowledge local land users, practitioners and implementers need enhanced capacity-building and the assignment of time for monitoring. However, this needs political, institutional and global conviction and support. If experiences are not shared and monitoring of the impacts is not an integral part of any rangeland project, both time and resources are being wasted. Multiple development experiences and research projects have a long history in SSA -it is simply foolhardy to let these lessons and findings lie untouched on dusty shelves.Development initiatives have seen successes as well as failures -the latter including controversial recommendation (e.g. promotion of exotic trees which have become invasive). The current analysis underlines the complexity of the challenge: a vast range of different land use systems combined with knowledge gaps and inadequate skills to address the challenges related to SRM. The requirements for knowledge about ecosystems and their processes, vegetation, hydrology, fire, conflict occurrence, population dynamics (people, livestock and wildlife) -and the different rangeland use systems and practices currently applied are vast and are increasing. This includes understanding of the land users, their customs, traditions, claims and aspirations. Involving research organisations as well as academic institutions and students must be seen as a vital precondition to address the complexity and wide array of issues that emerged from the analysis of experiences.Focus #19: Improve awareness to induce a shift in perception.• Disseminate proven sustainable rangeland management practices.• Give voice to the various rangeland users to spread their experiences.• Raise awareness about the challenges and opportunities of SRM solutions.• Illustrate the complexity of human interaction with rangeland ecology.• Demonstrate the multiple impacts of good rangeland management.• Support platforms for awareness-raising, knowledge sharing and solution finding.• Bridge the barriers between the French and English speaking regions of SSA by creating multi-lingual knowledge sharing platforms.• Implant rangeland development issues into the policy level debate.• Involve researchers, postgraduates in training to address rangeland-related questions and help raising awareness.Focus #20: Identify current and future knowledge gaps.• Clarify changing and evolving claims about rangelands.• Better understand the complexity of rangeland management.• Assess and quantify on-site impacts -social, economic and ecological -of different land management practices.• Identify and assess off-site impacts -social, economic and ecological -of changes in land management related to drought, floods and sedimentation, or deposition of windblown particles.• Explore off-site impacts of climate change and especially climate extremes such as droughts.• Carry out cost-benefit analysis, with quantification of synergies and trade-offs.• Map and monitor of change of different land management practices, land health and ecosystem services.• Invest in better understanding of aspects of ecological, habitat and climatic heterogeneity.• Clarify about roles of protected zones, riverine areas, wetlands and mountains.• Clarify the role of improved rangeland management with regard to conflict resolutions and reduction of migration.The vital importance of rangelands for various users and uses has been one clear outcome of this exercise. So has the need to improve land management and push for significant outscaling of SRM practices. Impact can be achieved, but only if a large area is simultaneously improved by rangeland users who agree to jointly implement SRM practices -then pressure on the land can be reduced, conflicts averted, and the vicious spiral of land degradation can be broken.To make a real difference, externally sponsored initiatives need also to break out of the typical project cycle of 3-4 years and become long-term investment and capacity building programmes.Specific areas have been identified as key to the wider spread of SRM. These are: the potential for outscaling, the need to understand how rangelands function, in terms of their heterogeneity and how this can be best utilised; the prerequisite of reducing overcoming conflicts over land and its resources; and the need to be sensitive to rangeland users and their aspiration and values.In areas with higher land productivity -on the wetter fringe of the rangelands -and higher population of land users with small plots of land, people can make a significant difference in spreading SRM and improving land health if the majority of the land users work together. If they have the same goal and mobilise themselves in the implementation of SRM practices, the impact can be clearly seen.However, in most of the drier parts of the rangelands, the population density is lower and labour is restricted, and thus the potential to mobilise land users in large-scale and long-term endeavours is low. Here, to make a change to the land, there are two possible technical pathways: indirectly,Given the complexity and diversity of rangelands, the accelerated dynamics of change and their management practices, particular human capacity needs to be developed at all levels. The list of knowledge required already points to the need to sharpen skills. When working in rangelands -more than in cropping systems -there is a need to be aware of both traditions and traditional knowledge and their integration with modern \"scientific\" notions. A further point has been made many times over the last 50 years: the mutual benefits that can be derived from exchange and interaction across SSA, especially those bridging the linguistic divide between West and East Africa.left: Open surface water as drinking supply for cattle in pastoral systems (Friederike Mikulcak).centre: Transhumant herdsmen water their livestock at Dig Diga well, Niger (Abdoulaye Soumaila).right: Wind pump for lifting borehole water from a deep groundwater table, Laikipia, Kenya (Hanspeter Liniger).Focus #21: Address knowledge gaps and improve knowledge management at all levels.• Involve researchers and postgraduate field workers in knowledge gaps including spread of SRM practices, cost-benefit analysis and impacts on-and off-site.• Improve compilation of and sharing SRM experiences using standardised tools.• Improve knowledge management and evidence-based decision making in implementation projects and agencies, in planning processes at local to national levels and in advisory services.• Improve support for a knowledge sharing platform for the rangelands of SSA and other rangelands worldwide.Focus #22: Enhance capacities throughout: from land users to decision makers.• Understand of rangeland use systems and sustainable rangeland management.• Improve exchange of knowledge and networking -sharing, analysing and using knowledge from different regions of Africa and applying it in local and regional contexts.• Continue documentation of multiple unrecorded SRM practices and experiences.• Develop skills for impact and cost-benefit assessments onand off-site.• Improve capacities in evidence-based decision making at local, landscape and national levels.• Use high-tech satellite image data, combined with participatory assessment and mapping.• Use scenario building to project impacts of different land management options.Focus #23: Secure the future of SRM.1) Enhance \"vast and fast\" outscaling of SRM through direct and indirect pathways.2) Embrace complexity, heterogeneity and opportunism.3) Address hidden and open conflicts in the search for SRM.4) Embed values, perceptions and aspirations of rangeland users into solutions.for diversification and intensification remains and a new strategy emerges to replace expansion. That is \"enhanced heterogeneity\" meaning tapping and broadening natural heterogeneity, both for production and for protection of ecosystem services.There isn't any grazing system that fits all situations: for example the 'Holistic Management' system has proved only marginally suitable in Kenya. Creation of grassland heterogeneity by strategic grazing of livestock has potential for conservation strategies at the livestock-wildlife interface.A clear differentiation between rangeland use systems (RUS) is not only fundamental for the selection of SRM practices, but it is crucial at the planning and policy levels for understanding of the potential for conflict. It is important at the political level between countries -as well as within countries -in order to settle old conflicts or avoid new conflicts and disputes. Hidden and open conflicts often arise over access to forage and water, and rights or property over them. Without accepted and followed agreements at local, national and even cross boundary levels, there can be no peace and effective sustainable rangeland management -though SRM can be a tool in helping to resolve conflict.through the management of animals e.g. through agreed grazing plans or regulating and providing water as a measure to control and guide grazing; and directly, through large-scale vegetative and structural measures e.g. microcatchments or clearing invasive species.The \"mainstream view\" that was widespread in the mid-20th century held that overgrazing was the central problem, and therefore widespread destocking was necessary. This would then bring animal populations down to a theoretical equilibrium based on calculated and regulated \"carrying capacity\". In the late 20th century new theories challenged this view. They said that rangelands were not predictable nor homogenous, but unpredictable and heterogeneous, and the best way to use them was to be opportunistic. Indeed opportunistic strategies based on mobility have indeed always been used by pastoralists to make use of heterogeneity. But there is also a role for rotational grazing strategies especially in 'bounded systems' (RUS 3 and 4) -as long as these do not involve overemphasis on complex fencing infrastructure and intensive rotation: a successful example of using \"functional heterogeneity\" -in other words careful planning and allowing animals to use heterogeneity.Whereas diversification, intensification and expansion of area are common strategies to improve and increase agriculture productivity on cropland, for rangeland this needs modification. In SSA rangelands, the potential for expansion is -in most situations -limited and in many cases, it is the opposite: rangelands are being \"devoured by other land uses\" and reduced in area. However, the potential Focus #24: Enhance \"vast and fast\" outscaling of SRM through direct and indirect pathways.Direct:• Support approaches for mass mobilisation for small-scale interventions involving the majority of land users.• Promote large-scale mechanised practices covering vast areas in a short period.Indirect:• Find agreement on joint actions for SRM involving the majority of land users within a Rangeland Use System (RUS) and land users from neighbouring RUS.• Find consensus on how to regulate availability and use of water points and access to grazing pastures.Focus #25: Embrace complexity, heterogeneity and opportunism.• Appreciate that there are more complex and multiple interacting factors than in other land uses.• Embrace that it requires to understand terms & concepts and their evolution over the last 50 years.• Acknowledge that heterogeneity needs to be integrated into management systems as a strategy to replace expansion.left: Heavy pressure with potential conflicts on springs in the drylands. Different tribes of pastoralist come from far to Chafa Spring, northern rangelands of Kenya (Hanspeter Liniger).centre: Big Life anti-poaching Rhino unit goes out for their morning patrol looking for tracks and camera traps in the field, Chyulu Hills, Kenya (© Charlie Shoemaker).right: Nearby the Kouré Giraffe Zone in Niger, local subsistence farmers are angry that giraffes are causing damage on their farms (William Critchley).Focus #26: Address hidden and open conflicts in the search for SRM.• Give conflict resolution top priority, and if possible strengthen local institutions in their role of resolving conflicts.• Address and resolve common conflicts about access to forage and water and property as part of all SRM approaches.• Support the formation of user groups within the same RUS, focusing on making joint decisions about implementation and reducing conflicts over resources.• Between different RUS (e.g. pastoral-agropastoral and settled crop farmers), and other users and claimants (e.g. mining industries and settlement developers) identify increasing disputes and seek to mitigate them by clear arrangements incorporated in SRM.• Avoid concentration of power or introduction of discrimination which can become a source of conflict.Pastoralists (with the exception of private and community ranchers) often have no, or little, security over the land or guarantee to its resources for the future -in contrast to most crop farmers. And the age-old question is: why should they care for the future of the land and its resources? If they improve their land it may attract others to lay claim to it. Thus, pastoralists often have slender incentive to maintain their land and protect its health.For many communities, livestock still form their savings, as well as being their pride and an historical symbol of wealth and prosperity. Additional off-farm income (remittances in particular) from a family member often means that this is converted into buying additional livestock -and additional grazing areas and water resources then have to be identified. Areas that are not well protected and even those that are (e.g. private ranches, game reserves and national parks) may be overrun and invaded especially during periods of droughts. The urge to increase herds is therefore a constraint to sustainable land management.Focus #27: Embed values, perceptions and aspirations of rangeland users into solutions.• Respect that pastoralists' cultures are rich, historically embedded in their livestock and the land.• Embrace that cultural identity is usually strong and traditions longstanding.• Clarify the role of land and water rights and tenure security as incentives to maintain land and its health.• Address the issue that, for many pastoralists, livestock represent savings and a visible symbol of wealth and prosperity.Sustainable land management on cropland is a question of radically modifying and simplifying natural systems: growing one or more crops on fields, that are made more or less uniform through intensive land husbandry. Rangelands are very different in that they are highly variable, seminatural ecosystems, where the interference of people is limited. Thus while croplands are typified by \"homogeneity\", rangelands are characterised by \"heterogeinity\". Historically the main methods of altering vegetation have been through range users' management of livestock, control of wildlife -and through burning. Vegetation can further be influenced by enrichment seeding of grasses and other species, and through assisting natural regeneration and regrowth, but the ecosystem remains essentially heterogenic and semi-natural with its own dynamics and responses to change. If indigenous perennial grasses are overgrazed, for example, they disappear and allow space for less desirable annuals -or invasive species whether indigenous or alien.Nature responds to human interference and changes. Therefore, the challenge to rangeland management is to understand and use the power of nature and its principles, cycles, responses and interactions with human interference, and to find a productive but nature-based system for the benefit of people -while maintaining a healthy, functioning ecosystem. This poses an enormous challenge and requires profound knowledge, continuous observation and responses to environmental change through adaptations in management.Given the wide range of topics, environments, cultures and institutions, rangeland management is much more complex than productive systems under other land uses. Visions, beliefs and doctrines needed to be faced and filtered out.There have been -and continue to be -endless discussionsand disputes related to the state of the rangelands, whether there is overgrazing or not, overstocking or not, if fire is good or malign, whether \"holistic rangeland management\" can work: the list goes on. A basic issue is whether rangeland users can or indeed cannot afford to balance their short-term productive interests with a longer term vision of healthy land and water resources. If they reach the state of being detached from the land, a fresh crisis and renewed vicious spiral of degradation will be inevitable. Happily, just as many rangelands have become degraded, there is huge potential for improvement. However the most fundamental question is whether viable options actually exist for rangeland management in the future, given continued fragmentation, limitation of movement, claims on resources, and reduction of the land available with a growing population?Indeed, rangeland management and pastoralism have experienced shifting perceptions and attracted increased attention from African governments, stakeholders, and their international partners over the last decades. This has translated into a host of projects and programmes throughout SSA. Experience has been far from universally positive -nevertheless efforts continue to be made to invest in the rangelands for their improvement. And design simply must be informed by past experience. Indeed there is strong demand for evidence-based decision making, tapping on the experiences gained so far in SSA 1 on SRM approaches and technologies to support implementation of these developments now. This can be strengthened by continued documentation and sharing of knowledge.Is there a future for the rangelands? If so, what might it look like? It is not within the scope of this book to answer those questions. The question here is whether sustainable rangeland management can make a difference. Certainly rangeland health has been, and is increasingly being, seriously affected in vast areas through West, East and Southern Africa. Nevertheless, there are many development initiatives in the rangelands that have been uncovered, brought together and analysed here. They demonstrate a very wide range of ways in which the rangelands can be improved -and the livelihoods of its peoples uplifted. If there is a future for the rangelands, it has to be founded in sustainable rangeland management, and in the positive trends are summarised below:Focus #28: Recognize fifteen positive trends for sustainable rangeland management in Sub-Saharan Africa:1 A huge number of experiences in SRM are yielding important lessons: continuing this process will uncover further trends & visible achievements.2 Enlightened policies are emerging at national and regional levels recognising the growing importance of rangelands.3 Traditional institutions are being revived and strengthened.4 Wildlife is increasingly being seen as compatible with livestock.5 \"Non-Livestock Rangeland Products\" can help diversify livelihoods.6 Agropastoralism is no longer underestimated in its extent and potential.7 Novel marketing mechanisms and partnerships are being developed.8 Water points are opening up new areas, and being used to control grazing. 9 Conflict management is being addressed at all levels from local to regional.10 Livestock -and wildlife-corridors are becoming legitimised and protected.11 Participatory planning of land use has become the accepted norm.12 Using nature-based solutions to strengthen SRM is backed by evidence: e.g. opportunistic use of heterogeneity.13 There is growing recognition that solutions must be tuned to specific rangeland use systems but also embedded in interactions and synergies with others.14 Rangelands are now being taken seriously for products & services: where once these areas were ignored, they are now desired for their resources.15 Specific modern technologies -for example the use of mobile phones and satellite image interpretation -are being used to guide rangeland management.left: Rangeland users and specialists discussing the rangeland health and appreciating the good perennial grass cover as one of the key indicators for good rangeland health, Enonkishu conservancy, Kenya (Lippa Wood).right: Four different management practices: from very recent bush clearing (below) to current heavy grazing (left) to resting (above) and clearing and fertilizer use (right) Ghanzi, Botswana (Hanspeter Liniger).Focus #29: Use the checklist to identify healthy rangelands:1 Soil is more than 50% covered in the wet season and more than 30-50% in the dry season.2 There are no patches or extensive areas with bare soil, hard surfaces and crusts (with exceptions: e.g. the natural system of the \"tiger bush\" or brousse tigrée).3 Perennial grasses constitute more than 50% of the vegetation cover.4 Undesirable and unpalatable species of weeds, herbs or bushes are less than 30% of the cover.5 Tree and shrub encroachment and impenetrable thickets (especially by non-native species) do not dominate over a larger area.6 There are no clear signs of surface water runoff or rill and gully erosion.7 Trees or shrubs are present except at the dry fringe of the rangelands in the grasslands towards the desert and in temporarily waterlogged grasslands.8 Native riparian forest/ woodlands are intact and not destroyed by cutting or river bank erosion. 9 Wetlands are not drying up or are overused by livestock.10 Water sources are not polluted and infrastructure damaged by unprotected and regulated access of large numbers of animals.Focus #30: Use the checklist to identify and promote \"healthy\" rangeland management practices:1 Knowledge about implementation of good rangeland management is easily available.2 People use knowledge to improve or initiate SRM.3 Institutional cooperation and support is sufficient to facilitate large-scale interventions.4 Rights and access to grazing land and water are clearly defined and secured 5 Users feel less vulnerable to droughts as there are clear arrangements for drought and emergency situations.6 There are mechanisms to deal with multiple claims for specific rangeland resources and times.7 Conflicts over the use of the rangelands are addressed and mechanisms for resolving conflicts are in place.Goats in Wajir (ILRI). Part 2 showcases examples of SRM technologies and approaches classified under the five SRM technology groups and four SRM approach groups. Each group starts with a 2-page summary, entitled \"In a nutshell\" followed by examples of \"good practice\" case studies. Selection of the 30 examples presented took into account a wide range of countries and good practices as well as recognition of compilers and institutions. This \"strategy\"-and the limited number of examples that could be included -made it impossible to present technology-approach \"packages\" but rather a selection of either the approach or the technology. The case study table in the Annex is an overview of all the SRM technologies and approaches that were studied in these guidelines and records which technologies were linked to which approaches. Technologies that help enable the mobility needed to graze over large areas or diverse zones to seek forage, water and mineral licks using traditional knowledge and innovations, or new technologies e.g. satellite image analysis, early warning systems at a large-scale.Mobility is a key characteristic of pastoralism. It enables access to water, pastures and markets, maximizes animal productivity, and reduces risks. By moving herds, rangeland users respond to fodder and water availability, and to challenges from diseases. Mobility relates to both livestock managers, herder families and animals (livestock and wildlife). The term pastoralism is used when mobility is opportunistic and follows pasture resources (nomadism), or characterized by regular back-and-forth movements between relatively fixed locations to exploit seasonality of pastures (transhumance); and agropastoralism when pastoralists settle and also cultivate significant areas to feed their families from their own crop production. This technology group includes measures that regulate or facilitate access to wet and dry season grazing areas and drought/ emergency reserves.• Enables a healthy state of the land by avoiding overuse through movement and providing rest periods, while exploiting gradients of forage quality and quantity. • Has good potential to exploit rainfall variability.• Copes with shocks and variability by enabling access to emergency areas and emergency markets. • Requires strong governance systems to ensure adherence to grazing rules and arrangements.Interventions that contribute to improved and more secure mobility include water points that allow better access to underexploited rangelands, land use planning designed to facilitate movement of herds through migration corridors to dry season grazing areas and access to markets.Traditional knowledge: (i) drawing on inherited knowledge (adapt) -accumulated over many generations -plus their personal experience, pastoralists are skilled at moving their animals to take advantage of seasonal feed and water resources, and set-aside grazing areas that they use as a bank during the dry season or droughts. They often use a mixture of grazers and browsers to make better use of the available forage. (ii) modernize and upgrade \"traditional\" pastoralism to continue to integrate variability and take advantage of it. One path is intensification in rangeland management by e.g. carefully supporting current mobile practices and focusing on improving livestock-related value chains. Custom grazing maps help pastoralists make better migration decisions in the face of increasing drought risks. Automatically updated every 10 days, grazing maps are generated using community knowledge digitized and integrated with satellite derived vegetation data, and distributed to pastoralists to improve their herd management and migration decision-making. In the first half year of use, livestock deaths were cut in half. In the Netherlands Space Office funded 'Sustainable Technology Adaptation for Mali's Pastoralists' (STAMP) and 'Mobile Data for Moving Herd Management and better incomes' (MOD-HEM) projects in Mali and Burkina Faso, SNV and private sector partners (including Orange, Hoefsloot Spatial Solutions, Ecodata and SarVision) provide pastoralists with detailed information on biomass and water availability and quality, herd concentrations, weather information and market prices -all easily accessible through their mobile phones. This supports them in planning their transhumance, and in selling their animals at a good price, enabling them to better adapt to droughts. The information is derived from a combination of data collected in the field and from geo-satellites.http://www.snv.org/public/cms/sites/default/ files/explore/download/cc_drylands_20-10.pdf;www.snv.org scale, access to and use of geo-satellite derived data (biomass availability and quality, surface water availability, herd concentration and market prices for livestock and grain), geographic information systems to map the state of rangeland resources and image analysis, models, indexes calculations. Development of early warning and response systems can support early destocking when a drought shock is impending. Modelling and mapping as a tool can also play an important role in reducing exposure to shocks, in conflict resolution in areas in which livestock-keeping competes with other livelihood activities, to ensure cooperative land use. Conflict resolution must be an integral part of drylands development. Telecommunication (radio, mobile phones) can be used to transmit detailed information to mobile communities.Mainly large landscape 'pastoral', transhumance and 'agropastoral' rangeland systems.• Allows space and flexibility for securing livelihoods in dryland marginal land.• Adapted to climate change/ extremes and its impacts: strengthens risk management and resilience. • Favours following the availability of water and forage, and allowing resting for recovery and deal with unpredictability of available resources. • Helps to provide essential ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation. • Maintains conflict resolution mechanisms (e.g. traditional agreements between pastoral groups), can help prevent organized crime and international terrorism.Main disadvantages • Adaptations or changes take time especially where land is communal and customs are key.• Limited recognition of the rights of mobile pastoralists. \"Modern\" tenure systems have largely failed to consider the way land is used in mobile pastoral systems. • Underrepresentation of pastoralists and little participation in design, land planning and monitoring. • Often no laws protecting mobility.• Inadequate basic service delivery in relation to mobile lifestyles.• Modern information technology supporting knowledge about the availability of fodder and water resources is inadequate, inappropriate to people's needs or simply not available.Enabled mobility is applicable in semi-arid and arid regions where seasonal movement is required because of long dry periods, fluctuations in rainfall and inherently poor soils.Interventions that contribute to improved and more secure mobility have potential. They ensure consultation and conflict prevention and identification of conflicting issues.Most of the technologies under this group showed a moderate to high trend of spontaneous adoption.IBLI is designed to help protect pastoralists and their livestock against the effects of prolonged forage scarcity. IBLI triggers payment to pastoralists when the forage situation deteriorates to levels considered to be severe, as compared to historical conditions over time. IBLI uses Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a satellite-derived indicator of the amount and vigour of vegetation, based on the observed level of photosynthetic activity. It measures forage conditions over a defined time period and compares the observed NDVI over a particular season, with the observed NDVI over a given historical period (e.g. 15 years). A set threshold below which payouts must be made is called the trigger level. https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/4012/ ILRI A system for ecological monitoring provides accurate observations on the development of sylvo-pastoral resources, the management of which is handed over to land users who are organized in a local association. In order to monitor the ecological status of the land, a method to record the Vegetation Cover Index (VCI) was developed to register changes compared with an initial survey.Ecological monitoring, based on the index of vegetation cover, is a suitable technology for the following purposes: (a) to check to which degree the objective to mitigate land degradation is achieved; (b) to provide authorities with a tool to assess sustainable land management; (c) to increase the transparency of the procedure to assess efforts from land users to protect the environment; (d) to implement corrective measures through specific management regimes (for instance prohibition on grazing); (e) to assess changes in income at the level of individual households, at the level of areas which are managed collectively, or at the level of the entire intervention zone; (f) to monitor the carbon stocks of woody vegetation.The vegetation cover is therefore the target variable of the technology. The main components of the vegetation cover are described, which are the cover of woody and herbaceous vegetation. The woody vegetation cover consists of three sub-strata: the tree cover, the cover of regenerating trees and the shrub cover. Each of these strata is assessed in square meters (m2) below the top of the woody plants. The total of the three strata of woody vegetation provides the indicator of the woody vegetation cover. The herbaceous cover is indirectly assessed through the extent of soil surfaces which are clearly without vegetation (crusts, hard pans or glacis slopes). Furthermore, the diversity of woody species is considered through an indicator. The three indicators are weighted to obtain the Vegetation Cover Index (VCI).The vegetation cover varies in space. The following major zones are distinguished: savannah with vegetation ranging from shrubs to woody vegetation (C), forested savannah (S), wooded mountainous savannah (M), forest galleries or wet zones (G). As part of the ecological monitoring, the development of the Vegetation Cover Index (VCI), calculated for the four zones (C, S, M and G) of an area, is compared with the development of the VCI in a control area. The control area represents the ecological state of a shrubland to which the rules for the management of natural resources, which are adopted in the Local Convention or in special arrangements, are not applied. The control area consists of equal parts of the four ecological zones (C, G, M and S). Comment: 7,000 km 2 in the region of Guidimakha (coverage 61%), the main drinking water points for livestock on the three axes of transhumance in Hodh El Gharbi. In general, due to the limited surface area of the forest galleries or wet zones, the distance between the plots should be modified, and is therefore fixed at 100 m. The total number of observation plots for the control area is 64, or 16 groups of 4 plots. The 16 groups are distributed evenly over the four ecological zones C, G, M and S (four groups per zone). As for the control area, the total number of plots in each area of an AGLC is fixed at 64. The number of groups per ecological zone is proportional to the fraction of the surface area of the zone in the total area. Labour costs.The time required for the field surveys, including the manual processing of the data, for a team of three persons varies between 3 and 5 days per area of an AGLC, depending on the distance from the area and the extent of the vegetation cover, particularly of the forest galleries. When the data are processed and analysed by computer, an extra half day is needed for an AGLC area. The costs of implementing the ecological monitoring are between 200.00 and 310.00 US$ per area and per annual survey. For the total extent of the areas managed by AGLCs in Guidimakha and Hodh el Gharbi (37 organisations), over a period of ten years and with three surveys per area, the costs are estimated at 25,000.00 to 30,000.00 US$.1. field surveys (Timing/ frequency: None) 2. manual data processing (Timing/ frequency: None) 3. computer analysis (Timing/ frequency: None)The survey of the Vegetation Cover Index (VCI) is done once a year or once in two years. The ecological monitoring is a sovereign task, and therefore is a service of the State.Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%All the areas managed by the Collective Local Management Organisation in the two provinces apply the monitoring.• To improve the transparency for land users of the procedure to assess their efforts to manage sylvo-pastoral resources sustainable through their compliance with the rules of the local convention.• Enabling supporting organisations to check to what extent the objective to mitigate land degradation is achieved, based on indicators of impact. • Provides information to apply and refine the rules for land management and specific arrangements (for instance the prohibition on grazing).• Dependency of local organisations on the technical services due to the sovereign nature. g not possible• The resources of the technical services for an annual survey are limited. g A frequency of once in five years could be justified, given that the impact of the sustainable land management will only be visible after that period.Access to services and infrastructure health Livestock keeping is one of the main economic resources in Chad (in support of 40% of the population and 18% of the GDP, Ministry of Livestock, General census). Pastoralism in the country is based on the mobility of herds in a context of irregular precipitation and variable forage resources in time and space, and benefits from complementary relationships between the different ecological zones. In Chad, herds are taken in regular movements with the seasons between the Sahelian and the Sudanese grazing areas. The former are nutritious but limited in quantity, while the latter are more abundant but of lower quality, and not accessible until the fields are cleared after the harvest (meta-evaluation of projects on pastoral water sources, IIED, 2013). Thus, pastoral livestock keeping is founded on mobility and rangeland management, and on building complementary relationships and trade around farming systems and cultivated areas. The pastoralist systems are economically competitive (limited use of food inputs), and occur in marginal land which is characterized by conflicts, riots and a high level of insecurity (Conference of N'Djamena: 'Pastoral livestock keeping: a sustainable contribution to development and security in Saharan and Sahelian regions'). In the pastoral zone of Chad, where access to water is limited, the management and control of water sources by a social group in practice also leads to the monitoring and control of the use of grazing land which becomes available when water is present.The project Almy Al Afia (2004Afia ( -2016)), developed by a partnership between the AFD and the Ministry of Water of Chad, operated in two regions of central Chad. The project Almy Al Afia was based on an entry 'development', concurrently with a process to consult and involve joint agencies. The project has improved approaches of preceding initiatives: concerted action and identification of water sources derived from the dialogue between users and authorities, and development of the local management of infrastructures and rangeland. The latter counteracts an exclusively private management or, instead, an ineffective public management which promotes free access to water sources and grazing land.The project has enabled to address the following points:1. Support mobility in pastoralism by enhancing the access to water (rehabilitation and construction of 160 wells; digging of 31 ponds for pastoral use);2. Maintain or build processes of consultation and restoring security (joint committees for consultation and prevention of conflicts during transhumance);3. Promote the proper use of water supply structures, in time and space (rehabilitated and new wells, excavated ponds) by context-specific management (strengthening of traditional management systems) and encourage the maintenance of infrastructure. The strip between these two zones is used for agropastoralism. Herds cannot remain there. Therefore the project has facilitated the movement of the herds to the zones further south. The pastoral ponds close to the livestock routes for the transhumance were created in a way to be easily used by the herders, but also to encourage short stays.The approach was combined with consultation through joint committees for the prevention of conflicts, and at a later stage by marking of sections of the livestock routes for the transhumance. Many meetings were held with the users of the land management structures and policy makers, with the aim to identify and negotiate the target sites and to anticipate methods for the management and maintenance of the structures. This has enabled to maintain an atmosphere of social stability conducive to cooperation. Along almost 550 km of the livestock routes for the transhumance, sections were marked ('mourhals' in Chadian Arabic). The demarcation was not intended to enclose the herds in the livestock corridors (from which they can move freely outside the growing seasons for agricultural crops), but rather to implement the results of the consultations on the land use on the ground. The committees for the prevention of conflicts, which were supported by the project, also played a major role. • pastoralism and grazing land management.• ground water management.SLM measure structural measures -S8: Sanitation/ waste water structures management measures -M2: Change of management/ intensity level, M3: Layout according to natural and human environmentThe wells (new and rehabilitated) and the demarcation of the livestock routes are the outcome of a long process of outreach. The communications between the local level (taking account of the views of future users) and the level of decision-making (administration) enable social agreements to be formalized. These agreements set the rules for the selection of the locations of the water supply structures, their management and maintenance.Author: Project Almy Al Afia. The costs of the constructions are highly dependent on their location (costs for the supply and disposal of equipment and materials), on the price of inputs (cement, etc.), and especially on the type of structure (depth of the wells, geological environment). The costs of the supply and disposal of equipment and materials include costs for the installation of the structures (water, cement, labour, machinery) on the construction sites (which are often far away from routes and towns), and costs for the disposal of the equipment after the construction is completed.The costs of supply and disposal can be significant with respect to the costs of the structure itself.1. Outreach/ awareness raising (Timing/ frequency: Four to six meetings prior to the signing of the social agreements).2. Construction of the facilities (Timing/ frequency: Four to six months, depending on the type of structure and its depth).3. Monitoring the management (Timing/ frequency: Regular visits of the project team to support the implementation of adapted management practices). Comment: The context of pastoralism has taken the project approach to not ask compensation from users: if the users are never the same, then who should be charged? Who will collect the payments and manage the collected funds? In addition, most of the water supply structures are far from financial institutions, which causes problems in securing these funds. Therefore the users contribute in terms of day-to-day maintenance of structures, by mobilizing labour in particular.The implementation of the different phases varies greatly in terms of the location of the outreach activities and the duration of the construction work. Comment: The amount of financial support varied with the type of structure (more support for management and maintenance is needed for new structures than for rehabilitated structures) and with their location or specific problem (in the case of structures located in the agropastoral zones). Financial support to the markings of the livestock corridors was indirectly provided through the committees for the prevention and management of conflicts. Comment: The profitability is considered in relation to the number of animals/herds involved. The costs of construction and rehabilitation are certainly significant, but the water supply structures are used for thousands of animals (in case of the most heavily used wells); most animals drink every two days. Therefore the costs per head of livestock are limited. The wells are long lasting, and therefore the returns are positive in the short and the long term. Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%The technology responds to a substantial need, but also corresponds to the capacity of land users to use and maintain the structures.The energy supply is provided by animal traction, and does not require external energy sources.• Permanent access to water.• Reopening of water supply structures and consolidation of access to water at some degraded sites. • Agencies and authorities for conflict prevention.• Marking of sections of livestock corridors with conflict situations.• Full commitment of groups (access to water is a major problem).• Continuation of the approach through the development of other projects and inclusion at the national level.Land user's view • Interventions are limited with regard to the needs (rehabilitation in particular). g By larger investments and better integration of the approach in public action. • There is a need to extend the approach, in particular the support to the consultative bodies. g Formalize support to the consultation process.• Recognition of the experiences, the approach and the methodology in other interventions. Outreach and awareness raising are performed during the project, but at the end the management of the infrastructure is no longer supported. The government should be able to follow up on the support (mechanism for monitoring and maintenance). g Formalize support to the consultation process. • There is a need to mainstream outreach and consultation (lengthy process). g Formalize support to the consultation process.IMPACT Comment: Access to water is such a large problem that it requires all the land users who enter the zone to be informed when a water supply structure is rehabilitated or constructed.The involvement of traditional leaders in the management of the structures, and the system of representatives of the traditional leadership in the various other zones (Khalifas) contributes to the spontaneous dissemination of the information. The purposes/ functions of the STDM: The functions of the technology as have been piloted by RECONCILE and partners has focused around land tenure. It addresses security of tenure for vulnerable poor communities living within informal settlements, through participatory common resource identification, mapping and documentation, key resources including cattle dips, salt lick areas/ fields and water points management has improved. This is due to the recognition of boundaries anticipatory defined leading to revival of and establishment of community resources management committees especially around water and grazing lands. This in return has improved/ increased production of both plants and animals. However, the technology can be customized to serve other purposes of information storage and management.Enumerators in the field (Ken Otieno). Small-scale dairy farmers have been able to manage grazing lands, water and salt licks to improve production of animal products. Information captured and managed by the technology has enabled communities within informal settlements to negotiate with government authorities to enable land allocation and thus security of tenure and improved livelihoods.What do land users like/ dislike about the technology?Likes: The technology is flexible, it can be customized to capture information in any form desired. It is based on a GIS platform which is easy to manipulate and is open source.Dislikes: Users sometimes encounter errors that are a result of incorrect information entered, and these errors are written with the programming format: thus it requires good knowledge of the technology to remedy this.Enumerators practicing the on how to use a GPS (Ken Otieno).The enumerators get instructions from the GIS expert on the use of the GPS (Ken Otieno). 2,000 to 3,000 depending on the kind of labour required and can go down to a compromised rate of Ksh. 1,000.The technology costs are dependent on the size and number of resources targeted by the process. It will therefore define the costs accordingly.1. Enumeration of at least 1000 farmers (Timing/ frequency: 9 months) 2. Mapping of communal resources water points, salt lick areas, cattle dips etc. (Timing/ frequency: 9 months) 3. Mapping of private resources water points within the private areas (Timing/ frequency: 9 months) 4. Data Management (Timing/ frequency: 3 months) 5. Preparation of data collection including testing of the tools (Timing/ frequency: 1 month) 6. Dialogue sessions with community leaders (Timing/ frequency: 2 months) 7. Negotiations on the methodology for data collection and the kind of information to be collected/asked (Timing/ frequency: 1 month) 8. Technical reviews and reflection with project team and partners (Timing/ frequency: 1 month)Comment: The kind of tasks undertaken in this process is more project oriented combined with advocacy and policy processes.The overall space or measurements for the project areas were within the range of 25 to 75 square kilometres.Author: RECONCILE. The project was supported by the UNHABITAT with contributions from RECONCILE and partners. the community contribution in kind is not included since it has not been tabulated in terms of cash.The project did not have physical structures developed. However, as a result of the work structures like cattle dips have been rehabilitated and are currently being maintained by the the communities themselves. This does not need recurrent costs for maintenance or otherwise by the project. Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%The technology covered around 500 individual farmers.Comment: The technology was more of the urban oriented tool but had to be modified to adopt to the local demands.The technology application did not attract any material gains or incentives but, the process was community centred thus the adoption.• Ability to define spatial space and common and private resources including those resources associated with milk production such as milk coolers, water points, cattle dips, food stores, grazing areas, salt licks, crushes, animal corridors, forest etc. • Establishes the carrying capacity of communal shared resources.• Establishment of the land tenure system of shared communal resources and issues arising. • Status (management) of private resources within the rangelands.• Production and income generated against household size.• The nature of the problem required innovative use in the mapping of the land and natural resources. • The technology addressed immediate needs and provided a foundation for future updates and demands. • The technology benefited from the existing data and improved delivery of output without any impediments. • The technology bridged the gap through skills transfer and capacity building and in facilitating dialogue on issues affecting the community (Maps, reports). • Ability to adapt the technology in a simple manner that the users can relate to, and find value in their use contributed immensely to success Introduced even a more user-friendly use of mobile and smartphones. • The 'quick win' could be seen in the transformation of mobile phones into data collection tools and the data can be seen, verified and shared, replacing the tedious manual process which many were struggling with. • STDM databases accommodate the inclusion of social, economic and spatial data that can be maintained, accessed and updated by the communities anytime. • Provided visual representation of available resources and their distribution and people can relate to spatial information on the map. • Ownership of technology by local people who are now leading on data collection, customizing the template, developing reports and innovating on its use.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• The design of the tool was more urban oriented and it took time to be adapted for rural use especially where land is communal and customary rights are key. g Created more awareness.• Difficult to set-up the server environment where no internet is available. g The internet component remains a challenge. • Technology is evolving and needs systematic information channels between the community members. • Engaging other service providers may be difficult and takes time (Internet service provider need to authorize setting up additional server). g The process requires proper funding in order not to have a break in between. • Appropriate devices for capturing data may require an additional budget.IMPACT ANALYSIS AND CONCLUDING STATEMENTSCompiler: Ken Otieno (peterkenotieno009@gmail.com)Resource person: Ken Otieno (peterkenotieno009@gmail.com) -SLM specialist There is also water governance based on a traditional hierarchy of rights. Through this system, Boran pastoralists adapt to severe and recurrent droughts.This grazing system is applied in Isiolo County, Northern Kenya. The Waso rangelands are inhabited by Boran pastoralists with Somali, Samburu, Rendille and Turkana herders sharing cross-border resources through negotiation. The technology is based on the maintenance of a delicate balance between livestock numbers, the supply of water, and the amount/ quality of standing pasture within the vast grazing area which is water scarce and prone to extreme seasonal variations. Through its main tenet of governing grazing patterns (wet, dry season grazing area and drought reserve) planned use of pasture is decided in large pastoralists' assemblies attended by elders from a particular 'Dedha' (a grazing area, which administratively can be as big as two wards). This process is complicated by dry seasons and droughts of unknown length, with pressure from the community to open grazing reserves. Wrong decisions can spell the end of livelihoods for some families. An ability, which has been gradually eroded over time and by external factors which don't understand its enormous benefit but there is a project which is using an integrated approach to revive and empower this system.The Jars a Dedha use water points to manage grazing. Different types of water sources need specific forms of management. The most intensive management occurs during droughts at deep wells and boreholes which require the most labour to operate and maintain, and are the most reliable sources of water. Due to the strategic importance of these resources, management falls to the Jarsa Dedha (council of elders). The use of shallow wells is tightly controlled by both the aba ella (the person who first dug it) and aba erega (the owner of the rotter ) working together. Aba ella is assigned first rights to water. If there is spare capacity then 'second rights' are decided by aba erega. Second rights would typically fall to those of a different clan, while 'third rights' might fall to a different ethnic group. The Borana customs and culture defines both access to certain wells but also the order of priority for watering animals.In addition, in consultation with the Dedha council of elders, aba erega manages the use of dams and access to rivers. Generally, use of flowing river water is restricted to the dry season and access is limited to designated watering points. These are located some distance downriver from settlements to minimize disruption to inhabitants and to reduce contamination. Temporary water sources during and after the rains are not subject to control except when their use conflicts with restrictions on grazing areas. After watering their livestock, pastoralists traditionally fill their troughs for wildlife at night. This is intended to prevent wildlife from falling into wells -and to seek God's blessings.Boran livestock in a wet season grazing area (Ibrahim Jarso). The high variability of rainfall in pastoral areas leads to similarly variable pasture availability. Therefore, management of grazing resources needs to balance maximizing productivity while ensuring survival. Long-term viability of the system depends on the maintenance of adaptive traits within local breeds, and both maintaining and managing resources strategically. Only within these broader goals is the concept of 'maximizing productivity' meaningful.Mature livestock (gues) which are not lactating are moved to remote pastures. The guess, which make up the majority of community livestock, are herded by young unmarried men. By utilizing remote pastures, grazing resources closer to permanent water sources can be preserved for the dry season and droughts. Pasture within the vicinity of homesteads (maar qaae -literally 'near grass') is protected from grazing by non-lactating livestock (this is similar to kalo but a kalo reserve need not be next to the homestead ). This pasture is set aside for young animals (calves, lambs, and kids). Migrating livestock have predefined routes that maintain distance from maar qaae. The Dedha council of elders, therefore, controls settlement patterns to preserve key migratory routes. Movement of livestock between different Dedhas must be prearranged with the respective Dedha council of elders who assess spare capacity in terms of water and grazing. Comment: The pastoralists depend on attendant pasture after the rains which are bi-modal in Isiolo County (Long and Short rains).The Author: Ibrahim Jarso.• pastoralism and grazing land management.SLM measure management measures -M2: Change of management/ intensity level, M3: Layout according to natural and human environment, M4: Major change in timing of activities.SRM Technology Dedha grazing system as a natural resource management technology, KenyaAuthor: Ibrahim Jarso.Comment: Regarding Surveillance of grazing areas, they observe pasture conditions and unwarranted access to preserved grazing areas and report on conditions. The surveillance is elevated after the rains as communities are in wet season grazing area depending on sub-surface water from the rains. Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%Number of households and/ or area covered 80% of Isiolo County (Around 24,500 Households).Comment: The grazing patterns were made more flexible and the rules made stricter.• It is the cheapest and easiest way of managing the rangelands for now and for posterity. • It provides room for flexibility of decision making as seasonal variations occur.• It is conservative and less costly to implement in the vast rangelands with few incentives. • It is a legitimate system recognized by all pastoralist for management of their rangeland resources. • It can easily be adapted to govern any pastoral rangelands all over the world (Universal).• There is no law protecting it. g Government needs to establish a law that recognizes and protects this technology. • Rich pastoralists can forego local rules and corrupt the systems overseeing the grazing plans. g Ensuring accountability for decisions made. As few lead elders can be corrupted and their decisions compromised but when the decisions on grazing are largely made in common meetings of all elders, the decisions are normally watertight and cant be influenced negatively.• Cross-border pastoralists are not aware of the Technology and tend to undermine it. g Improve awareness of the technology among the cross-border pastoralists that also access Isiolo rangelands.Compiler: Ibrahim Jarso (jarsoibra@gmail.com)Resource person: Ibrahim Jarso (jarsoibra@gmail.com) -SLM Specialist To which changing conditions? climatic change/ extremes changing markets labour availability (e.g. due to migration)Controlled grazing includes any system in which the producer controls the grazing pattern of the livestock. It covers seasonal grazing, may involve enclosures, physical or social fencing, rotations, grazing reserves (fodder banks), regulation of grazing and mobility. The manipulation of animal movement is used to control when, what and how much the animals graze. Grazing management involves evaluation of the nutritional and forage needs of animals, assessment of forage quality and quantity, and then the regulation of access to the pasture/ range.Fencing plays a critical role in the success of controlled grazing. Controlled grazing is often equated to 'rotational grazing' where pasture is subdivided into several smaller paddocks by fencing. Livestock then graze in one of the paddocks until the forage has been eaten, and then are rotated sequentially to the next paddock, leaving the grazed paddock to recover.• Rotation and regular resting is a key principle.• Arrangements with neighbours to agree on conservation of specific areas for dry season/ drought forage. • Securing the rested areas from invasion to ensure enough dry season/ drought forage.• Additional strategies against pressure from other rangeland users and droughts may be needed, e.g. emergency markets.Enclosures involves temporary or permanent access control of livestock to a designated area by physical/ social fencing. Fencing is most often used to exclude livestock from cropland, along livestock corridors as well as environmentally sensitive areas such as streambanks, wetlands and woods, including restored wildlife habitats and buffer strips for conservation purposes. National grazing reserves are areas set aside for the use of pastoralists. They are not assigned to individual ethnic groups, but are held in reserve for usage during emergency conditions.Rotational grazing and rangeland resting is based on the subdivision of the grazing area/ pastures into a number of physical enclosures or areas with social fencing. There is systematic, sequential grazing of these paddocks or areas by livestock in rotation to prevent overgrazing/ selective grazing and to optimise grass growth. Rotational grazing can be considered a management-intensive grazing system.Combined herding: (a) daily combining of livestock into a single herd to be driven to different designated portions of the communal grazing area; (b) separate, planned grazing in villages during the rains, then \"bunching\" and moving of all animals in herds during the dry season.Controlled grazing in western Kenya (ILRI/Dorine Odongo).In a nutshell Holistic Management is based on planned rotational grazing that 'mimics nature' with the aim of building up organic matter and water in soils and thus increasing pasture productivity. To simulate this function livestock are \"bunched\" in large herds and frequently moved between different areas. Denuded land is recovered by a \"Boma\" technology: i.e. strategic corralling of animals overnight, and reseeding.Split ranch grazing involves grazing half the available area for a full year -concentrating livestock. The consequent grazing pressure maintains the grassland in an immature, high-quality state, while resting the other half, allowing optimal recovery from the previous full year's grazing.Mainly in 'bounded' systems with and without wildlife and 'parks & reserves'.• Resting periods followed by intensive grazing mimics the \"nature\" of the rangelands as they evolved. • Better grass cover and greater abundance of high-quality perennial grasses. Control of less desirable vegetation. • Increased forage production reducing need for supplementary feeding and salt and mineral licks. • Increased resistance of system to drought.• Regulates the coexistence of wildlife, domestic livestock, and people.• High costs and labour input for construction and maintenance of physical fences.• Social acceptance to maintain and manage social fencing including high labour input.• Concentration of livestock in a fenced area can increase the risk of predation by carnivores/ rustling by people. • Danger of disease outbreaks in big herds, and from wildlife -livestock interaction.• Potential over/under use of certain habitat type through mismanagement.Developing a controlled grazing system and putting it into practice requires planning and rangeland users involvement. Each area differs in soil type, availability of water, forage species, pasture conditions, availability of labour, slope of land, type of livestock. These factors should be assessed in order to ensure successful applicability of the controlled grazing system. 'Controlled grazing' is typical of commercial ranches. All other technology groups are mainly mixed, or subsistence in their market orientation.Most of the technologies under this group showed a moderate to high trend of spontaneous adoption.In Olkiramatian and Shompole, seasonal livestock movements and herding practices are formalised by group ranch grazing plans governed by local committees. The wet season grazing areas are termed \"livestock rearing zones\" (east of the Ewaso Ng'iro river). The dry season grazing areas are retained as \"grass banks\", and since the early 2000s, have been used additionally as wildlife conservancies for ecotourism (west of the Ewaso Ng'iro river). Creating a gradient of quality and quantity of pasture across the landscape is achieved through clearly designated seasonal grazing areas for livestock and tight controls on settlement areas, grazing patterns and water points.At the individual herder level, traditional ecological knowledge plays a strong role in the decisions made to improve livestock. https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/4026/ Wildebeest and livestock grazing in the wet season (Guy Western).Three hectares of degraded land are enclosed with a fence. A dense living hedge of local thorny trees (e.g. Acacia nilotica, Ziziphus mauritiana etc.) is planted. A strip of 10 m along the hedge is dedicated to agriculture, equivalent to approximately 10% of the protected area. The rest is dedicated to natural regeneration of the local forest and woodland. The protected area is of paramount importance for biodiversity conservation and fodder production. The grass is cut and carried to feed livestock outside the regeneration area. Borana is a private ranch which combines extensive livestock production (beef, dairy, sheep) with conservation and tourism. There is strategic fattening and offtake for sales in harmony with conservation principles. Grazing comprises \"bunching\" and planned rotational movement of all animals in herds acting as a \"plough\" by breaking the soil to help incorporate seeds and nutrients. Water also infiltrates better. The aim is to improve plant growth and soil. On Il Ngwesi Masai Group Ranch, livestock production management is a combination of traditional livestock keeping and holistic grazing management principles which were introduced in 2007. Livestock production at Il Ngwesi is for subsistence and sales -and has very high cultural significance. 80% of the land is used for conservation, where wildlife and their habitat are protected. The vision is to integrate community development and sustainable environmental management.Holistic Management (HM) was originally conceived by Allan Savory (1988), and is promoted by the Laikipia Wildlife Forum. It integrates decision-making, planning, and livestock keeping. On the land, this means bunching of all livestock close together (in order to act as a 'plough' and break the soil to allow seeds, nutrients, and water to infiltrate) resulting in better plant growth. By moving the animals together from block to block, HM aims at managing high numbers of livestock while restoring degraded land. Instead of individual livestock-owning families herding and trekking their own animals, consolidated herds are now managed and moved together, and overseen by herders and supervisors. This allows intensive grazing in restricted areas while resting the remaining land -instead of continuous open grazing. However, Holistic Management principles are still a matter of controversy. While advocates of these management principles do not limit herd sizes, opponents see the root cause of degradation exactly in too high stocking rates. Criticism is plentiful and reviews of the method state that there are no peer-reviewed studies that prove that Holistic Management is superior to conventional grazing systems in outcomes (Carter et al. 2014, Briske et al. 2014).The group ranch land consists of a settlement and a conservation area. The conservation area is further subdivided into a small core zone, measuring 500 hectares and a larger buffer zone of 6,000 hectares. Within this buffer zone, pastoralists are permitted to graze livestock during the dry season.Besides these two main grazing areas in their group ranch, they use additional grazing areas outside their territory such as pasture in forests. In one forest -Mukogodo -they have settled officially; in Ngare Ngare and on Mount Kenya, on the other hand, it is more of an informal agreement. In Il Ngwesi, HM principles are very strictly applied in the conservation area; elsewhere only partly or not at all. During the movements to the forest glades and Mount Kenya, HM principles are maintained as far as possible.This documentation describes the combined grazing management system. During the rains, the grazing system is largely by traditional management: animals remain in and around villages managed individually by households. During the dry season, all livestock are bunched together and managed as one herd. Comment: Il Ngwesi has an area size of 87 km 2 . However, the total affected land by livestock is 157 km 2 . The technology is also applied on other ranches (mainly private ranches, see the documentation for neighbouring 'Borana') in Mukogodo division. Livestock from Il Ngwesi Group Ranch. Il Ngwesi Group Ranch, Laikipia (Michael Herger).Example of a (permanent) boma. Mobile bomas are usually only constructed with cut thorn bush. This boma is not on Il Ngwesi. (Michael Herger). During the wet season, grazing at Il Ngwesi Group Ranch is organized by elders within their seven villages. HM principles are only partly applied. During the dry season, once all the grazing land is eaten, livestock are bunched together and managed by a few herders and overseers. The block system rotation starts. To seek new pasture and water, cattle and smallstock are led to forest glades, and then to the Il Ngwesi conservation area. As soon as the forest pasture is gone, they move on to the conservation area. Usually, this movement of livestock to forests and conservation area starts in February; then they return to the villages in April; and then back to the forests and conservation area until the next rains in November.Whilst the livestock are bunched together, large bomas (corrals in Kiswahili) are constructed for overnight enclosure. Bomas are sited on bare land where dung accumulation and crust breaking by hooves helps rehabilitate land. Every year the boma sites are shifted slightly according to a plan. The total area that can be restored per year is almost 1% of the area of Il Ngwesi.Purpose related to land degradation prevent land degradation reduce land degradation restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land adapt to land degradation not applicable• pastoralism and grazing land management Comment: Across the grasslands and rangelands an increase in bare land and bush has been a clear trend all over Laikipia for many years, both on community-owned lands and private ranches. Major identified ecological problems (partly) caused by livestock production are: bare ground, low contents of soil organic carbon and plant-available nutrients, soil erosion (sealing, crusting, rills and gullies, water flow patterns, sheet erosion, pedestals), poor soil properties, undesirable species, and (increasing) woody and invasive species.The technology aims at improving vegetation cover of the land and thereby reducing further degradation and restoring degraded land.Grazing Principles:-Rotational, planned grazing -Bunching -Resting periods for pasture -Bomas for bare patches (night corrals) Author: Michael Herger.Il Ngwesi Masai also started to buy land outside their Group Ranch. Managing of one big herd, many supervisors needed. -Movement of bomas -Livestock-owning families (although they obviously don't receive any salary): this is simultaneously their livelihood and used for subsistence. But once all their livestock is bunched in a big herd, they lose their nutritional source (milk, blood) and livelihood (sometimes they keep back a few units for this reason).1. Training of elders and community by project leaders (Timing/ frequency: None). 2. Grazing planning for bunched animals (livestock from all households) (Timing/ frequency: None). 3. Hiring herders, supervisors, watchmen etc. (Timing/ frequency: None).Comment: Trainings were funded by NRT, LWF and Lewa Conservancy. No figures on this.Overall additional costs since introduction of new technology are estimated at 20% higher than before. 50% are covered by project funding (LWF, NRT, Lewa Conservancy).Comment: Costs per unit are multiplied by days. According to the interviewed manager, total costs are only USD 18,000 (without herders). However, the listing of all costs results in much higher total costs. Total animal treatment costs for Makurian Group Ranch in comparison are USD 428,000 (labour USD 380,000, animal treatment USD 48,000, without livestock-owning families). Also, people living in the area (population of 8,000 inhabitants) are involved in livestock keeping and are included here in calculations as labour (for 3 months, wet season, 10% of total population). Cost/ benefit is currently negative for livestock keeping. Income due to livestock sales is roughly estimated USD 340,000 (price for cattle on average USD 400 per unit, sales around 500 p.a., price for goats and sheep each USD 40 per unit, sales around 2,000 p.a., slaughtered units (for subsistence use) cattle: 50, shoats: 1,000 -detailed figures available Herger 2018). Comment: All listed impacts are as perceived by land users according to Patrick Leseri, Conservation Manager. In his opinion, vegetation cover has thanks to the new technologies improved. Planning activities significantly increased and therefore also socio-economic and ecological conditions improved. Results from a rangeland health assessment (only ecological conditions) show on the other hand partly heavily degraded ecological conditions (poor soil and vegetation, erosions features, inability of producing annual grasses after rains etc.) (Herger 2018). Land users and experts are aware that the ecological conditions of this Group Ranch are still far from optimal, but do see good progress and exemplary management as well as slightly better conditions than on other Group Ranches.Greater variation of seasonal rainfall, higher intensity of rainfall events, change in rainfall regimes in general (see Schmocker 2013 andImfeld 2016). increase not well at all very wellheatwave not well at all very wellPercentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%To which changing conditions? climatic change/ extremes changing markets labour availability (e.g. due to migration)Comment: Masai people have changed their livestock composition towards owning more smallstock (goats and sheep) than cattle. Goats are tolerant of drought, and as browsers, they don't need any grass. Also, they can be turned into money much quicker than a cow in times of need and because of their more rapid reproductive cycle. They can also recover number more quickly after livestock losses through drought.• Proper utilisation of pasture -controlled usage/grazing • Land recovery (more cover, more water, more fodder, less erosion).• Carrying capacity increased.• Traditional knowledge is still used.• More dialogue in community: brings everyone in the community together -they have a common point -everyone has the same interest. • Improving breeds is easier (because all are bunched together).• Easy vaccination of all livestock at once. • Approving cultural lifestyle of Masai: the higher the livestock numbers -the better for the land. • Better for disadvantaged community members: for instance for those who could not afford to move their livestock to Mt Kenya on their own before.• The listed advantages from Patrick Leseri, the land user, are for the most part shared share with the compiler's view. Improved planning of livestock production with planned grazing and long resting periods, improved dialogue in the community, and the named advantages of a big herd (like easy vaccination etc.) are important advantages. Regarding Holistic Management (HM) principles, there remains uncertainty about land recovery. On the one hand, it is generally questionable to state as in HM: 'the more animals the better' (as long as they are managed properly they can even recover degraded land), which seems dangerous in areas with such high livestock numbers and cultural value of livestock keeping -without scientific proof of the principles in similar ecological conditions. We have witnessed rather poor condition of the land, and the much-vaunted good land was difficult to find. Favourable descriptions might also be related to funding of the project. Results from a rangeland health assessment show (partly) heavily degraded ecological conditions (bare ground, poor soil and vegetation, erosion features, partly an inability of producing perennial and annual grasses after rains etc.) (see Herger 2018). However, an evaluation of change over time is impossible to assess. Further monitoring is necessary. Land users and experts are aware that the ecological conditions of this Group Ranch are still far from optimal, but do see good progress and exemplary management as well as slightly better conditions than on other Group Ranches. However, the efforts towards good management and a sense of community was not difficult to notice.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• Higher costs. Above 20% more than normal costs. Northern Rangeland Trust (NRT), Laikipia Wildlife Forum and Lewa conservancy as main funders for applying holisitc management principles. Since 2007, they covered about 50%of all costs. • More labour intensive. 20-30% above normal (supervision, watchmen, moving big bomas). • Challenge to bring people together (and their livestock) and agree on a joint management. • Some families still prefer to manage their livestock on their own and make their own decisions. There are no individual decisions anymore: principles apply to everyone. • Breeding can also be a problem -those with good genetic material (better livestock) may lose and those with poor may win by mixing. • Conflicts among animals; bulls fight a lot. No separation of heifers, cows, steers and bulls. • Management of high numbers of big herds is a challenge.• Diseases are easily transmitted.• Once livestock is collected to big herds, individual families lose their nutritional basis (milk, blood). However, some also keep a few livestock units back. • Sometimes trees are cut for bomas.Split Ranch Grazing involves grazing half the available area for a full year -concentrating livestock. The consequent grazing pressure maintains the grassland in an immature, high-quality state, while resting the other half, allowing optimal recovery from the previous full years grazing. The technology is simple, requiring less fencing than more complex systems, without compromising sustainability or ecological function. These concepts can also be used for management in pastoral-wildlife systems to create habitat heterogeneity (short and tall grassland).The Split Ranch Grazing Strategy (SRG) was developed by Riaan Dames in the North West province, South Africa. It is fundamentally different to popular rotational management systems and contains several conceptual advances. One key difference is that SRG provides a full-year uninterrupted recovery period for rangeland after grazing. This enables grasses to maximize nutrient recovery over the main pulses of nutrient mineralization in the early wet season, and to maximize root growth and associated nutrient storage over the late wet season and early dry season -when most root growth occurs. Optimal recovery periods should ideally, therefore, encompass the full wet season and the early dry season. This contrasts with rotational grazing where recovery and grazing periods are apportioned across these two periods, with resting periods often not occurring in key periods of nutrient uptake and root growth.A major problem with having both grazing and recovery periods in the same season is that grassland is able to mature during recovery periods, greatly reducing forage quality and grass growth rates, thereby negatively impacting animal production. Another problem is that complex rotational grazing requires strategies investing much in a complex and expensive fencing infrastructure. The solution is a fundamentally different strategy where some paddocks are grazed the whole year to prevent grassland maturation and other paddocks are simultaneously rested to optimize recovery. In addition, paddocks should be as few, and as large as possible, to maximize livestock access to functional resource heterogeneity, thereby improving adaptive foraging options, while reducing costs of fencing (fencing can even be replaced by using physical boundaries (e.g. roads, rivers, etc.) and herding the livestock.Livestock are maintained in the grazing paddocks until mid-dry season to ensure that grasses in the rested paddocks have completed root growth and ceased all other growth -thus fully rested and recovered. A full years rest allows maximum uptake and storage of nutrients in deep, strong root systems and crowns. Thus when these grasses are grazed in the next season they have not only efficient root uptake of moisture and nutrients from the soil but also can re-allocate nutrients stored in roots to leaf production after each grazing event, resulting in a productive supply of high-quality fresh leaf to livestock over the growing season.Photo showing a contrast between a grazed and rested paddocks in the early dry season (June) at Tiisa Kalahari Ranch, Ghanzi. Note the reserve of forage for the mid and late dry season in the rested paddock (the cattle will moved into this rested paddock in July). Also note the even utilization of grasses in the grazed paddock by the end of the wet season (Photo Richard Fynn). Grasses in the grazed paddocks are kept in an immature, leafy state during the wet season by sufficient sustained grazing pressure (Theresa Fynn).Photo showing a cattle preference for short high-quality green grass in the mown strip along the Charleshill road, avoiding the taller and lower quality unmown areas further away from the road. This demonstrates the importance of maintaining grazed paddocks in a short high-quality state (Photo Richard Fynn).Purpose SRG can be implemented as simply as dividing the ranch into two paddocks with livestock spending alternate years in each paddock (A) or the ranch can be divided up into several cells according to needs, such as having to separate breeding herds, bull herds and weaners (B). In scenario A it is important to ensure good water distribution in each paddock to ensure access to the whole paddock. This simple scenario (A) is ideal for rural development schemes owing to minimal infrastructure costs and is easy for rural communities to implement. Another advantage is that it gives livestock much greater adaptive foraging options. In scenario B a central water point provides a convenient way of changing the livestock between paddocks. The gates can be left open between diagonal paddocks to allow livestock freedom of access to either of the diagonal paddocks or they can be actively moved between diagonals during the grazing year according to the rancher's decisions. If paddocks are extremely large then other water points should be provided across the paddocks to allow livestock even access to all parts of the paddock.Author: Richard Fynn. Fencing and infrastructure have been shown to be major factors increasing establishment and maintenance costs and reducing profits. Thus SRG aims to reduce these costs by having fewer larger paddocks, which also has benefits for the animals. Another major cost is that of supplementary feeding, especially if forage is depleted during the dry season. This technology aims to ensure that a reserve of forage is created for the dry season, to overcome this. It also aims to improve the quality of forage during the wet season so that supplementary feeding is not needed for fertility improvement. Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%In Ghanzi region of Botswana probably about five ranchers have adopted the technology.Comment: This technology aims to reduce infrastructure and maintenance costs by reducing the amount of fencing. It also aims to reduce reliance on supplementary feeding.They have adopted the technology because of seeing the results of those using the technology and from farmers day talks.• Management complexity is reduced -fewer paddocks and less frequent movement between paddocks. • Establishment and maintenance costs are lower than complex rotational grazing systems owing to less fencing required. Livestock production increased relative to costs. Daily combining of livestock from all households into a single herd to be driven to different designated portions of the communal grazing area. Grass can then recover by replenishing its reserves before being re-grazed some months later.This technology is currently being applied in communal areas as well as commercial farms of Namibia. It is particularly effective in areas with no fences, and areas with high incidence of stock theft and predator losses. The technology aims to replace continuous, open grazing with a planned system. This gives grass a chance to recover in the growing season, and prepares the soil and grass for the forthcoming rainy season. In addition, fixed stocking rates based on carrying capacities are replaced by flexible stocking rates which track availability of forage. Two grazing plans are developed for one year; one when perennial grasses are growing and the other when they are dormant. Grazing plans may change, depending on the season and unanticipated events such as fire. A grazing plan is put in place for the growing season, that ensures plants are not re-grazed before they have recovered their root reserves. It is targeted at good animal performance. In the non-growing season, animal numbers are adjusted to ensure that there is sufficient grass to last until the next rains.The grazing plans must take into account all factors that affect livestock performance as well as capacity of the livestock owner. These factors include occurrence of the first rains, presence of natural water pans, current and projected animal performance, availability of good quality forage for cows prior to bulling, avoiding poisonous plants, and timing of vaccinations, etc. Once the plan has been developed, the animals are moved by herders using low stress handling techniques to various parts of the farm or communal grazing area, according to the plan. Strategic moving of livestock by herding enables fire breaks to be created by deliberate over trampling. Each night the livestock are brought back to a kraal ( Afrikaans for corral) where they are kept overnight. Watering of livestock can take place in the kraal at night, in the morning, or alternatively in the field depending on water availability. This process is repeated day after day by the herders.At the end of each growing season, the amount of forage available to the current herd is estimated. Animal numbers are adjusted to make sure that there is still sufficient forage to support them before the rains -and to leave enough ground cover to feed the soil organisms and protect the soil from erosion. Deciding when the forage produced will run out needs to be done using a method that livestock owners relate to. Livestock owners may decide to meet and reach consensus on this based on their knowledge and past experience of the effectiveness of rainfall. If it is decided that there is sufficient food to see the animals through until the next rains, then livestock owners will be satisfied; if there is excess forage they may be able to re-stock. If, however, a forage shortage is expected then de-stocking is required: the severity of the forage shortage determines how many livestock can be carried on the land during the off-season. Again, livestock owners can reach consensus on this. Deciding whose animals to sell and how many is always a thorny issue, so livestock owners will always move excess livestock to other areas if possible, or alternatively sell unproductive animals. Comment: Community projects facilitated by NGO 'Conservation Agriculture Namibia'.Map used for developing the grazing plan for Outokotorua communal grazing area (Colin Nott).Grazing chart used for developing the grazing plan for Outokotorua communal grazing area (Collin Nott). The grazing plan means that livestock will only be on a particular piece of land twice in any given year (once in the growing season and once in the non growing season). The animal density is however high, leading to increased impact for a very short period.Schematic of planned growing season grazing. In this diagram grazing started in the bottom left hand camp (plot), marked d1, and the livestock were grazed in this area for one day.The next day the herd of livestock were taken to the area marked d2 and grazed there. This continued until day 41 where the livestock are currently. If deviations from the plan occur then the grazing map is marked according to what actually happened. This is the map that helps inform next year's grazing plan -to avoid using certain camps at the same time of year. The degree of greenness in the diagram indicates the recovery of grass. It is lightest in the area just grazed, marked d40. By the time the herd reaches day 120, which has the darkest green indicating readiness to be re-grazed, then the grass in the area marked d1 was calculated to have recovered sufficiently to be re-grazed. This plan has a built-in recovery period of 120 days. It is possible that growth rates are slower than expected and it may be necessary to reduce numbers of cattle in the herd to slow down movement to ensure an adequate recovery period.Author: Colin Nott.• Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 5,000 ha) • Currency used for cost calculation: US Dollars • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: USD 4 Appreciation by land users that investment in herders will pay back, especially from the second year onwards.1. Three meetings for mobilization of communities (Timing/ frequency: Month 1) 2. Exchange visit to local livestock owners using this practise (Timing/ frequency: Month 4) 3. Assess water infrastructure, site and drill and install additional water point (Timing/ frequency: Month 6) 4. Grazing planning meeting with stakeholders (Timing/ frequency:After adequate grass growth to enable planned grazing) 5. Appoint, equip and train herders (Timing/ frequency: After 4) 6. Planning meeting and determination of starting date (Timing/ frequency: After 5) 7. Build overnight kraals at new water points (Timing/ frequency: When needed) 8. Build temporary kraals for improved grass growth (Timing/ frequency: When needed)Comment: Grazing maps and charts produced by CAN (support NGO), but will be taken over soon by farmers. The ability to bring back perennial grasses into the system allows higher stocking rates, less drought risk and better quality animals, therefore higher income over time and consequently a better cost-benefit analysis.Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%Comment: Addition of erosion control and overnight kraaling to assist with gully control. Refining re-planning in response to monitored results that deviate from aims.Comment: This is a key issue undergoing lobbying of government and the communal farmers union to establish through a consultative process legislation that enables grazing plans to be enforced from within and from outside. This is lacking at the moment.To which changing conditions? climatic change/ extremes changing markets labour availability (e.g. due to migration) adaptive management• It is cost-effective; genuine improvement is seen in grass production, while livestock losses to predators are significantly reduced. • For absentee owners they can leave a manager and herders in place to get on with the work and this can be easily evaluated after time since animals wondering around leave evidence. • Livestock are better cared for than they used to be, and a sense of community has been restored.• This is a viable and upscaleable technology for both communal and commercial farmland in Namibia and beyond. • It addresses the root cause of livestock related degradation and on a larger scale could have a significant impact on mitigating climate change if all the degraded rangelands of the dry climates of the world were restored by using the principles embodied in this approach -one which has been adopted in the National Rangeland Management Policy and Strategy. Moreover it can improve the quality of lives of millions of people who live in areas where livestock is the only viable land use. • This is a true 'triple bottom line' technology that improves the resource base whilst increasing profits and enables improved quality of life for residents.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome Land user's view • Herders are difficult to find, train and keep. g National level vocational training of herders is required. • Water infrastructure tends to result in overtrampling of the same routes. g The Directorate of Rural Water Supply should change its water specifications to include the provision of water for livestock -which can be cheap and effective. • Grass poaching takes place by neighbours and the majority will of people in an area is sometimes overrun by a small minority. g Farmers Unions must address these issues and get enforceable mechanisms in place for improved rangeland management.• There is insufficient national buy-in from line ministries in terms of implementation to address many of the issues that have been raised. g Line ministries should support implementation to address these problems. Joint implementation, joint review and adaptation by government, unions, livestock owners and support providers will assist in solving many issues for resource-base improvement.Range improvement including soil improvement involves management of fire/ prescribed burning, firebreaks, enrichment planting, seeding of leguminous species, control of bush encroachment and alien invasive species, natural regeneration, soil fertility amendments (manure), erosion control, soil moisture (water harvesting by micro-catchments) and reducing evaporation losses.• Develop and implement a grazing management plan.• Improve range health by managing soil health and improving forage quantity and quality.• Improve range through restoring grass cover e.g. reseeding, clearing of invasive and unproductive species, and fire management. • Improve plant water availability and water use efficiency, by in-situ water conservation and rainwater harvesting. • Improve soil health by increasing organic matter and hence improving soil aggregate structure, soil's ability to store water and nutrients, and soil microorganism content. • Secure rights over the land and water.Reseeding and planting: can be an effective and inexpensive method to improve the quality and quantity of forage (pasture and hay) including right species selection to reduce competition and avoid spread of invasive species. After reseeding a management change is needed to favour the continued growth of the seeded grasses.Fertility improvement: through livestock manure collection and spreading (adding organic matter and nutrients) or by incorporating nitrogen-fixing leguminous species in the range.Control of bush encroachment and alien invasive species: often associated with high grazing pressures. Unpalatable shrubs increase when the more palatable ones are overgrazed. Several control mechanisms are involved: fire, mixed grazing use by grazers and browsers, mechanical uprooting, pesticide or biological control.Fire management (natural and prescribed burning): enables regrowth and access to palatable and nutritious regrowth especially of perennial grasses. Fire is also used to control invasive woody vegetation (indigenous and alien). Effect of fires depends on intensity, seasonality, frequency and type. Herbaceous biomass is the key determinant of fire activity. Trees promote fires at low densities but suppress fires at higher densities. Firebreaks are strips of land from which the trees and vegetation have been removed to prevent fire from spreading.Land user managed natural regeneration: woodlands are restocked by trees that develop from seeds that fall, germinate in-situ and are protected from browsing in early stages -until they are out of the reach of animals.Plateau with Nardi/ Vallerani pits, planted with grass and trees, Niger (GIZ). Enclosures: rehabilitate and restore the natural resource bases (soil, vegetation and soil water) by prohibiting grazing and allowing resting and recovery.Erosion control: prevent loss of soil due to water runoff and wind (e.g. gully stabilisation, dune stabilisation). It involves mainly vegetative and structural measures.Soil water management: protect soil moisture by reducing evaporation losses and improving rainwater infiltration. Water harvesting by microcatchments such as planting pits and half moons.Reseeding and microcatchments found in 'agropastoral' and 'bounded' systems and 'small-scale settled pastures'.Fertility improvement and enclosures are applied in 'small-scale settled pastures'.Control of bush encroachment and invasive species is often done under 'bounded' (trees and bushes) or 'pastures' (herbaceous species) systems, where land rights are firmly regulated.Firebreaks: 'pastoral' and 'agropastoral' systems.Managed natural regeneration and dune fixation: in systems where crop production is integrated -'agropastoral' and 'pastures'.• Improves rangeland health. Soil and water conservation improves soil and vegetation health as a basis for improved fodder/ forage productivity. • Increases vegetative cover and fodder production.• Improves pasture quality (regeneration of perennial grasses, control of invasive species).• Protects grazing lands from erosion and sand encroachment.• High cost input of implementation.• Susceptible to conflicts as improved green land attracts neighbours and invasion.Pasture and soil improvement practices are scattered throughout Sub-Saharan Africa. These systems are most common around settlements and urban centres in the Sahel and in many agricultural areas in in East and West Africa. This group of technologies is mainly applicable in more intensively managed systems. Seeding of degraded rangeland is more costly than resting for recovery and natural regeneration.There is a strong trend towards spontaneous adoption, thanks to high effectiveness regarding increasing productivity and soil and water conservation.The grazing areas are communal lands set aside for the animals in the rainy season, enabling the reduction of conflicts between farmers and livestock keepers. For more than two decades these areas have been invaded by Sida cordifolia, a species disliked by animals. A method was successfully tested that combines tillage and weeding with seeding of Hibiscus sabdariffa, or roselle -a plant normally used to make tea or eaten as a vegetable, but also valuable as a fodder. Because of its rapid germination, the hibiscus invades the area very quickly, and suppresses the first seedlings of the Sida cordifolia.https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/3442/ Grazing land invaded by Sida cordifolia (Issaka Dan Dano).The most common way of manure concentration is by corralling or tethering livestock during the night. During the day the animals are allowed to graze rangelands, fallows or crop residue fields. Corrals are moved to a new spot every 4-5 nights in order to spread manure evenly. While a 250 kg cow produces about 1 kg of manure (dry matter) per night, 7 sheep or 7 goats are needed to produce this same amount. To cover 1 hectare of land with 2.5 tons of manure, a herd of 15 cattle would need to be corralled for 3.5 months. Thus, it is recommended to organise corralling within a community of farmers and especially to revitalize the traditional corralling contracts contrats de parcage with transhumant herders. https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/3608/ Cattle corralled on a crop field to improve soil fertility, Niger (ILRI/Stevie Mann).The catchment of the Mount Fletcher dam in the Eastern Cape is affected by severe sheet and rill erosion due to overgrazing and veld (grassland) fires on the highly erodible soils resulting in severe siltation of the dam. The main purpose of pitting is to enhance infiltration of runoff water by capturing and ponding it on capped/ crusted bare soils. It is combined with brush packing (laying cut bush on the soil's surface) or mulching, and the construction of silt fences (low barriers across the slope) to further improve sediment trapping. Re-seeding in pits with commercially available grass seed mixes can enhance vegetation cover. https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/3659/ Rehabilitation of eroded land in the Mount Fletcher dam catchment, South Africa (Jacob Buckle).The Technology mechanizes the traditional technique of zai and semi circular bunds for water harvesting using a modified plow named Delfino3s pulled by a 180hp tractor. A normal plow on flat land excavates a symmetrical, continuous furrow, and earth piles up equally on both sides of the furrow. The Delfino3s plow has a single reversible plowshare that creates an angled furrow and piles up the excavated soil in half moon shaped ridges only on the downhill side. The plowing must be done along the contour to collect and slows down runoff water as it flows downhill. The plow's blade moves in and out of the soil creating micro basins about 5 meters long, 50 cm deep, 50 cm wide and spaced 2-3 m. The ripper placed before the plow cracks up the soil to a depth of 70 cm facilitating the infiltration of water into the soil profile and the growth of deep roots. After plowing, the local population sows seeds of plants of indigenous species. They are sown along the ridges of the basins and in the furrow of the ripper. While for most species seeds are collected by the local population, for species rarely present in the region, seeds are purchased from tree nurseries. Sowing the manure of goat containing seeds has also been very successful with about 95% of all micro basin having at least one tree growing.The intervention on a big scale, the effects of water infiltration in depth, erosion reduction and vegetation growth, boost a long lasting rehabilitation process. Each day the Delfino plow can plow up to 20 ha, digging 6.000-7.000 micro basins. The speed, the capability to plow hard, abandoned land, the effectiveness of the Delfino3s plow are its major advantages for the ecosystem rehabilitation process but require a big commitment. To make the best out of it, a great motivation and organisational work is necessary to: find great availability of land; train accurately the technicians; have well-rooted Subjects in the region. The technological aspect is just part of the recovery process, an important work with the Communities is required upstream and downstream. Communities are involved in the management process -in identifying the areas to be restored, clarifying the land uses of the affected areas, planning and implementing e.g. gathering and keeping seeds of local ecotypes, sowing, in the management of plantations and in the monitoring and evaluation of the results.Rules for SLM are adopted and respected by all. The Technology is applied in a degraded agro-sylvo-pastoral area of the Sahel Region, in the north east of Burkina Faso with 200-500 mm of annual rainfall. The soil is sandy-loam, strongly degraded with surface crust. The population is mainly composed of semi-nomadic herders. At the beginning of the project, the NGO Reach Italia was promoting schooling; they soon realized that during the dry season most kids left school and that to avoid it they should face food security and pasture improvement. So they started applying the Vallerani System and developed the participatory approach. The vegetation growth reduces the need for fodder search and long-range transhumance which also allows children to go to school regularly. The Degraded field after plowing (Lindo Grandi).Local people sowing indigenous trees and shrubs seeds in the tilled lines. Sowing days are important and joyful events for the communities (Lindo Grandi).Main purpose improve production reduce, prevent, restore land degradation conserve ecosystem protect a watershed/ downstream areas -in combination with other Technologies preserve/ improve biodiversity reduce risk of disasters adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts mitigate climate change and its impacts create beneficial economic impact create beneficial social impactGrazing land -Extensive grazing land: Semi-nomadism/ pastoralism Intensive grazing/ fodder production: Improved pastures Main animal species and products: Goats, cattle.Unproductive land -Specify: Hard abandoned land.Remarks: Especially at the beginning of the project, some communities agreed to try the system on their most unproductive land. After seeing the results, they started to request the intervention on less degraded soil and on fields that are closer to their villages. Upfront costs for the acquisition of the required implements are around 40,000 EUR for the plow and 75,000 EUR for the tractor. Depending on the maintenance activities, the spares and fuel costs can be reduced. Fuel, oil and spares also greatly depend from the characteristics of the soil and the purpose of the project. The NGO REACH AFRICA which implements the project is also supported by REACH ITALIA which mainly works for fundraising. They have many different founders. After the first years, thanks to the collaboration and funding by the Swiss Association Deserto Verde Burkinabé and the good results achieved, founders are more likely to be found. The main are: different NGO's, some Italian Municipalities, a Swiss school, the Government of Burkina Faso, FAO, international cooperation agencies of Luxembourg and Belgium, a mining company and others.The actual (2018) total cost of each implemented hectare is $170. This cost can be considerably reduced by around 22% in the case of an optimal use of the Technical Mechanization Unit, ie 800-1000 hours of work per year. This means that an operator who works with the plow Delfino has a gross investment cost which can vary according to its technical and organisational experience and by the amount of the plowed surface each year.1. Pasture management to avoid overgrazing (Timing/ frequency: After the rain and in the dry season) 2. Vegetation growth management (Timing/ frequency: During the first 3-5 years) 3. Woodcut management (Timing/ frequency: After 4-7 years) 4. Equipment maintenance (plow, tractor) (Timing/ frequency: Daily, weekly, seasonal) Comment: Maintenance costs of plow and tractor greatly depend from the attention and technical skills of tractor drivers and mechanics and from the diligence and frequency of the maintenance activities of the implements. No other maintenance costs are foreseen for the Technology. Comment: Up to 30-50 years ago biodiversity was rich and soil coverage higher.Comment: During the dry season men often migrate(d) to the nearby mines or cities for off-site income. After the implementation of the Technology the need for seasonal migration reduced. Difference in gender involvement: the project involves reforestation and pasture improvement for the grazing of livestock which is a men dominated activity. Since 2010 women have sown and protected from grazing some special plants for medical and domestic use and as raw material for handcrafts. Population density: 10-50 persons/km 2 . Annual population growth: 3%-4%. Off-farm income specification: The only activity people of the region are engaged in is goat and cattle breading. Crop production is practiced only for subsistence use.Area used per household < 0.5 ha 0.5-1 ha 1-2 ha 2-5 ha 5-15 ha 15-50 ha 50-100 ha 100-500 ha 500-1,000 ha 1,000-10,000 ha > 10,000 ha The system includes the use of a heavy duty tractor and a special plow whose costs are high though difficult to sustain by the local population. Most financial costs are covered by founders and donors, the land user's participate to the project with their work so even if the benefits in the short term are fewer than in the mid and long-term, for them it is still very positive. Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%Number of households and/ or area covered 330 villages and around 33,000 beneficiaries.Comment: The design of the plow has been adapted to increase the performance of the implement and reduce the running costs of plowing. The reversibility of the plowshare reduces the need for empty rides. The different parts of the plow are adjustable to adapt it to the needs of the project and the soil characteristics.Comment: Except for plowing, the other activities part of the Technology are practicable by the population under an initial guidance of a promoter with specific training. These are done without any material incentives/payments. The technology is well known in the Region and there is an active participation of the local people and a strong demand for new interventions. • Highly degraded, abandoned land becomes fertile and rentable again. Fodder increases in quantity and improves in quality and lasts all year round. Food security also in drought years. Herds are healthier and more productive. Fodder and water availability for animals is closer to the villages. Some plants can be sown for different uses: crops, medicine or for the production of mats or other handcrafts products that can be sold. • Better life conditions, more income opportunities and diversification. Food is diversified and more nutritious. Less hunger and diseases. • Greater community cohesion and less migration, better environmental consciousness and commitment, education and security. People gain back dignity, confidence in the future and hope.• The Technology allows the rehabilitation of rangeland and highly degraded areas in a fast and natural way on a large scale. This can boost a longlasting effect and the shift of the whole ecosystem. The Technology confers drought resilience and reduces the effects of climate change. It allows the sequestration of CO 2 and can contribute to achieve the Land Degradation Neutrality Goals. • The participatory approach is essential for the sustainability of the project. The local Communities improve their life quality, awareness, cohesion and resilience. The need for migration is reduced and people has the chance to stay in their Lands. • The sown tree and shrub species are mainly indigenous and locally adapted species. Each specie can follow it's own growing laws and adaptation strategies. Through the tillage process the technology offers the highest degree of efficiency in the first years from processing. Its effects last for a long time so it does not need to be repeated on the same site. • The VS does not use any water (except rain) in countries where water is rare and precious. • The use of a mechanized implement allows to rehabilitate very hard, degraded and abandoned land on large areas with reduced population. As the Delfino3s can plow strongly degraded land, the local people often ask to work their worse land which they would never be able to use.Land user's view • Land that was unproductive and nobody claimed becomes productive: it can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. g Land use and production exploitation rules must be cleared and accepted by all Subjects at the beginning of the project. • Good pasture attracts animals and herders from the nearby Region (also from far away and abroad). g Rules must be clear.• The investment and running costs for the machinery are high and cannot be covered by single land users or small Communities. g The projects must be financed by donors or founders.The Community can participate to some extent to cover the running costs. • The speed and effectiveness of the Delfino3s plow are its major advantages in the ecosystem rehabilitation process but can also be its major limitation. To make the best out of it, it is necessary to have a great availability of land (1,000-1,800 ha) every year. g A big organisational capacity is needed. The spreading 'like wildfire' that has characterized the case study was possible by the presence on the territory of an NGO already active and rooted in the territory for many years and by perseverance, respect and competence of all involved subjects. • Since great extensions will be processed, a big organisation is needed for all connected activities (awareness raising, seed collection and stockage, training, logistics, etc.), g Must be well organized and should operate already before starting with plowing. • The professional level of the tractor drivers and the mechanics as well as the lack of a well-organized mechanical workshop and spares stock can lead to long interruptions of the work and high extra costs. g Professional technical trainings and monitoring are very important. The organisation of a well managed mechanical workshop and spares stock are essential. This can also be a great development opportunity for the Region. • The increased amount of fodder can induce the shepherds to increase the number of animals. g An important work with the Communities is essential to achieve shared and sustainable management goals.Firebreaks are strips from which dry vegetation -straw -is removed in order to stop the progression of fire into the large areas of grazing land. They are of paramount importance for protecting and securing available grazing.In Niger, firebreaks are constructed in pastoral and agropastoral zones, which are characterized by abundant grazing after the rainy season -but also by a high risk of bush fires.Every year, at the end of the rainy season, thousands of hectares of grazing land go up in smoke due to bush-fires. This causes enormous losses of fodder, which is essential for the survival of livestock in this Sahelian region which has lacked adequate grazing over the last decades.Firebreaks, as their name indicates, are strips of land set-up perpendicular to the dominant wind direction. They are between 20 and 30 m in width and spaced 3 to 4 km apartaccording to the national standards in Niger. Along these strips, which can exceed 10 km in length in the pastoral zones, dried vegetation is removed. This creates firebreaks which stop the progression of fires into the large areas of grazing, thereby protecting and securing fodder supplies. In general, firebreaks are implemented according to a 'cash for work' approach, with the aim of supporting the local economy and strengthening the resilience of the population, and of the livestock, during the lean season. Three specific objectives are set for this technology in Niger: (i) the clearance of the firebreaks is part of the annual plan for preliminary support to the populations experiencing food insecurity. These plans are implemented by the National Mechanism for the Prevention and Management of Disasters and Food Crises (DNPGCCA).The main activity in the implementation and maintenance of the firebreaks is weeding with local tools (Hilaire, daba, machete) and the collection and storage of the cut straw. These activities require a large number of laborers (men and women). The main advantages of the technology are low implementation costs, ease of scaling-up, contribution to efficient management of the fodder resources, and a contribution to the training/ mobilization/ organisation of the pastoralist populations. Finally, it fosters efficient spatial planning of the grazing areas. The direct impacts are reduction of bushfires, improved protection of grazing areas, and an increase in the income of the local people. The indirect impacts consist of the increased financial resources of the land users, and the impacts of the measures for the prevention, and management, of disasters and food crises.This technology, while combating bushfires and fostering the increase of incomes, contributes to improved livelihoods of livestock keepers and to sustainable land management. However, the systematic commercialization of the cut straw may reduce the potential for regeneration of the vegetation cover in the grazing areas, and may cause conflicts between the traders of straw and the land users. This technology, while combating bushfires and fostering the increase of incomes, contributes to improved livelihoods of livestock keepers and to sustainable land management. However, the systematic commercialization of the cut straw may reduce the potential for regeneration of the vegetation cover in the grazing areas, and may cause conflicts between the traders of straw and the land users. The project concerned is a micro-project, financed by the Food Crisis Unit (CCA/the Prime Minister's Office), in the framework of the Annual Plan to Support Vulnerable Populations. The CCA/ Prime Minister's Office is an institution of the DNPGCCA.Firebreak in Ameidida (Abalak, Tahoua, Niger) (Abdoulaye Mahamane).Young men and women clearing a firebreak. The straw that is removed is piled up on the sides of the firebreak (PAAPSSP). Livestock density: The livestock numbers (in tropical livestock units) are between 200,000 and 300,000 over the five last years, which is high considering the overall area and the human population dependent on them.The clearance of the firebreaks is part of the annual plan for preliminary support to the populations experiencing food insecurity. It is an instrument to distribute income and food supplies to people through the work accomplished under the \"High-Intensity Labour\" (HIMO) initiative through the approach of \"work for food supplies and/or cash\". (ii) Selling of the straw was developed to enable people on the one hand to increase their financial resources, and on the other hand to implement strategies for storage and optimal use of the fodder resources. Author: Abdoulaye Sambo Soumaila.Firebreaks, Niger RANGE IMPROVEMENTThe firebreaks contribute firstly to preventing effects from bush fires on the available grazing land, by mobilizing the local populations in regular activities of surveillance, monitoring and control of the bush fires in the grazing areas, and in imposing penalties to those responsible for the bush fires. Secondly, in case of bush fires, the effects for grazing are limited; the firebreaks therefore reduce the land degradation which would result from these bush fires.Comment: The firebreaks contribute to limit the effects of bush fires on the vegetation cover and the biomass.1. Information/ awareness-raising/ mobilization of the local populations (Timing/ frequency: At the start of the project, after the harvest and the clearing of the fields in the agro-pastoral zone.In the pastoral zone, this activity is after the end of the rainy season.) 2. Planning workshop to identify the direct beneficiaries (Timing/ frequency: After the campaign of information/ awareness-raising/ mobilization of the local populations, during one day.) 3. Training of fire guards (Timing/ frequency: After the identification of direct beneficiaries, over three days.)4. Laying-out of the firebreaks (Timing/ frequency: After the rainy season and following the training of fire guards.) 5. Weeding (Timing/ frequency: After the laying-out the firebreaks.) 6. Collection, transport and storage of the straw (Timing/ frequency: At the same time as weeding of the outlined strips.) 7. Selling of the straw on the markets (Timing/ frequency: During the lean season (March-June).) 8. Monitoring and evaluation (Timing/ frequency: During the period of implementation of the technology, and after the end of the project.) The most important factor affecting the costs of the technology is unskilled labour; this technology requires a large amount of labour, both for the implementation and for the maintenance.The main activities in the implementation of the firebreaks are the weeding, the collection and the storage of the straw. In some cases, the straw is distributed between the livestock keepers (direct beneficiaries), who use it for their livestock. Monitoring and evaluation are carried out by the local contracting NGO, the technical departmental services, and by members of the sub-regional committee for the prevention and management of food crises (agriculture, livestock keeping, environment).The mule and oxen carts for the transport of the straw were provided by the local populations. In the cost assessment, the 20,000 CFA francs represent the rental cost for each cart. The firebreaks are implemented in the framework of the annual plans to support vulnerable populations in all regions of Niger. They are realized with the approach 'cash for work' after the rainy season. In a few cases, the firebreaks are cleared during the rainy season. This is not according to the national standards and does not fit in the framework of sustainable land management. Ultimately, all costs are covered by the Food Crisis Unit, except for the costs for the use of mule and oxen carts, which are owned by the direct beneficiaries. The maintenance activities consist of weeding the strips after each rainy season. This activity should be continuously performed during the entire period of high fire risk in the agro-pastoral and pastoral zones (October-February).The maintenance costs are covered by the local populations, who ensure their own compensation by selling the straw.The success of the maintenance is highly dependent on the income that is generated with the sale of the straw. Therefore, the livestock keepers organize themselves to maintain the firebreaks, which are used as corridors and rest areas in the majority of cases. These costs are calculated for each unit of 3 km 2 .The firebreaks are constructed in the grazing areas, generally on flat or gently sloping terrain. These regions consist of plateaus/glacis, plains and valleys. Several sand dunes have formed over the last four decades.Comment: There are two main soil types: (i) sandy soils and sandy-loam soils in the dune formations, and (ii) clay soils and loamy clay soils in the valleys and depressions. On the hillslopes glacis and stony soils are found.Area used per household < 0.5 ha 0.5-1 ha 1-2 ha 2-5 ha 5-15 ha 15-50 ha 50-100 ha 100-500 ha 500-1,000 ha 1,000-10,000 ha > 10,000 ha Comment: In the pastoral zone, the grazing land was declared communal by the scheme on pastoralism of 2010. Private land ownership in this zone does not exist according to the law. The scheme of 2010 regulates the access to resources (water and grazing land). It should be noted that private land ownership only exists in agglomerations and urban centres.Comment: In the pastoral zone, private land ownership does not exist according to the law. The livestock keepers install themselves on the lands and cultivate these. However, private ranches increasingly appear in this zone, challenging the socio-economic and environmental equilibrium. The deployment of fire guards mobilizes all stakeholders for natural resource management. This increases dialogue and improves the peaceful co-existence in the zone. However, in the agro-pastoral zone, the pressure on resources leads to conflicts between the agro-pastoralists and the young traders of straw. Comment: From the perspective of the livestock keepers and the agro-pastoralists, there is no doubt about the economic and financial viability of the firebreaks. They enhance rational management of the available grazing land, by establishing a dynamic of conservation and protection. The costs of implementation and maintenance are much lower than the income generated and received from the DNPGCCA (National Mechanism for the Prevention and Management of Disasters and Food Crises), and especially lower than the opportunity costs (of the grazing land saved from bush fires) in the short/medium and long term. Comment: The weeding of the firebreaks could increase the risk of water erosion due to surface runoff in the weeded part.The loss of vegetation cover in some parts of the grazing areas could also promote wind erosion, with sand from outside the sites being transported to the treated zones. The firebreaks have small off-site impacts. It should be noted that the transport of the straw leads to the movement of some forage seeds to other zones, where they could become invasive plants.Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%Almost 10% of the livestock keepers in the zone have adopted the technology, focusing on the collection and storage of the straw.Comment: These livestock keepers have adopted the technology spontaneously on small surfaces. They understood the need to stockpile straw for the lean season.The adaptation consisted of developing markets for the straw, and especially for forage seeds, which are collected during the weeding of the firebreaks. This adaptation led to increased marketing of the straw, and in this way transformed the management of the natural resources. According to the organisations of livestock keepers, like the 'Association to Revitalize Livestock keeping in Niger' (AREN), the effect of sale of the straw is negative: it puts an additional pressure on this resource, which cannot effectively recover due to climate change.To which changing conditions? climatic change/ extremes changing markets labour availability (e.g. due to migration)• The protection of the grazing land. In this region, where bush fires are common, a significant reduction of the impacts of these fires on the grazing land decreases the vulnerability of the local populations. • The marketing of the straw. Significant income was generated following the implementation of the firebreaks. • The ease of implementation and maintenance of the technology, and its low costs, apart from labour.• The protection of the grazing areas from the impacts of bush fires, which have become a disaster for the transhumant livestock keepers in the last decades. • The approach of 'cash for work', which was implemented during the construction of the firebreaks, enables on the one hand support of the vulnerable populations during the lean season, and on the other hand the creation of positive momentum for the conservation and protection of the grazing land. The combination of measures for sustainable land management and food security is, without doubt, an effective strategic instrument for this pastoralist zone, which is in an almost chronic state of crisis.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• The implementation of the technology could threaten the extensive management of the grazing land through the marketing of the straw. g The regulations for the marketing of straw should be strengthened, and especially the rural markets should be regulated. • The transport of the straw carries along certain forage seeds to other zones, where they could become invasive plants. g An effective transport system for the straw should be put in place.• The systematic marketing of the straw is a major weakness. This may reduce the potential of the vegetation cover to regenerate in the grazing areas, and cause conflicts between the traders of straw and the land users (livestock keepers, agro-pastoralists).g Conservation measures for herbaceous species and measures to control soil degradation should be put in place in the firebreaks.Compiler: Soumaila Abdoulaye (leffnig@yahoo.fr)Resource persons: Soumaila Abdoulaye (leffnig@yahoo.fr) -SLM specialist; Mahamane Abdoulaye (ongadr2016@gmail.com) -SLM specialist The significant growth of the population is dramatically increasing pressure on natural resources. In combination with the impacts of climate change and desertification, the process of land degradation has accelerated, resulting in chronic deficits in food and forage throughout the country. Facing these multiple environmental and ecological challenges, the state and its development partners have been testing and refining the technology of ANR since the 1990s. Assisted Natural Regeneration involves accelerating the process of natural regeneration of vegetation resulting from natural seedlings or from stumps inherently present in the area. Shoots from tree stumps with living root systems grow faster than seedlings derived from seeds. In the agricultural zone, ANR is a technique suited to improved land clearing, which involves locating and preserving shoots from stumps of desirable species of woody and herbaceous vegetation during the process of opening of land for cultivation. On sylvo-pastoral communal land this results in an increase of desirable vegetation species with the best potential for ANR. These include those with a strong ability to sprout from roots or those that can be propagated by layering.In the pastoral zone the practice was developed by livestock keepers to optimize the length of the grazing period during transhumance. Techniques employed are tree trimming, selection of the livestock routes for transhumance to enhance ANR through the movement of animals, monitoring and protection of palatable species, seeding of local forage crops in areas with low vegetative cover, and protection of particular species that enhance the development of understory vegetation. of firewood or timber, (iv) production of forage for livestock, (v) reduction of evapotranspiration, and (vi) restoration and preservation of forage resources in the pastoral zone.The following results are expected for the agricultural and agro-sylvo-pastoral zones: (i) a significant increase of woody biomass for energy provision, forage and timber, (ii) an increase in agricultural yields, and (iii) new sources of income enabling farmers to improve their living standards. Results expected for the pastoral zone include: (i) conservation and preservation of palatable vegetation species for livestock in the grazing areas, (ii) an increase in forage resources and woody biomass, and (iii) restoration of the vegetation cover on degraded pastoral land.ANR requires labour and hand tools (hoes and machetes). The low costs of implementation and maintenance are the major advantage of this technology; these explain the ease of adoption and the broad dissemination among agro-pastoralists and livestock keepers. However, due to the lack of regular monitoring of achievements and the weak enforcement of laws that regulate the management of forest resources, the ecological and socio-economic impacts of ANR in Niger are limited, especially in the pastoral zone.Herd and a shepherd girl on a grazing area and transhumance during treatment with Assisted Natural Regeneration (Abdoulaye Soumaila).Agro-pastoral producer applying RNA on an agro-sylvo-pastoral land (Amadou Adamou Kalilou, GREAD).Main purpose improve production reduce, prevent, restore land degradation conserve ecosystem protect a watershed/ downstream areas -in combination with other Technologies preserve/ improve biodiversity reduce risk of disasters adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts mitigate climate change and its impacts create beneficial economic impact create beneficial social impactGrazing land -Extensive grazing land: Nomadism, Seminomadism/ pastoralism Main animal species and products: cattle, dromedaries, sheep, goats and donkeys. In this zone, the implementation of ANR is part of the management framework for herds and forage resources. Purpose related to land degradation prevent land degradation reduce land degradation restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land adapt to land degradation not applicableComment: Apart from preventing and reducing land degradation, ANR also contributes to the restoration and rehabilitation of degraded land, that otherwise would have required considerable investments. In that case ANR is linked to the closure of certain areas for grazing to enable a full recovery of the land. Small equipment (machete, hoe, short-handled hoe, etc.) set 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 100Total costs for establishment of the Technology 45,000.00Comment: These activities are part of the implementation of a development project. If ANR is implemented spontaneously, the agropastoralist or livestock keeper directly initiates ANR without an awareness campaign or supervisory committee in place.Sketch 1 shows tree seedlings which are pruned to fewer stems to enhancedevelopment.Sketch 2 presents the structure of a patchof doum palm seedlings, showing theinterdependence between the differentsprouts. Sketch 3 presents a scheme for a doumpalm plantation in the agricultural zone, inan arrangement of cells with trees invarious stages of regeneration over aperiod of 30 years.Author: PASADEM, Maradi, Niger.Author: Peltier Régis, Claudine Serre Duhem and Aboubacar Ichaou. The mean annual precipitation in the pastoral zone does not exceed 300 mm. In the southern regions of Niger (the Sahelian zone), annual precipitation is between 500 and 600 mm. Recent decades have been marked by a large variability in rainfall in space and time across Niger.Name of the meteorological station: meteorological stations of Abalak and Tillabéry.The pastoral zone of Niger has a Sahelian-Saharan climate. The agro-pastoral regions of Niger are characterized by a Sahelian climate.In case the implementation of the technology was conducted in the context a development project, only the costs of training are not borne by the land user, but covered by the project. In some cases the project also provides technical support, such as the installation of a tree nursery or food distribution.The total costs are indicated for the establishment of ANR through a development project. When the land user accomplishes ANR himself, the costs are 24,000 CFA francs/hectare, that is the costs for labour and depreciation of equipment. Labour costs represent almost 90% of the total costs for establishment of the technology. The costs for installation of a nursery are not included in the cost calculations. In the strict sense, ANR is not combined with the production of nursery plants.The maintenance costs exceed the costs for establishment of the technology due to the efforts to secure the ownership of treated land throughout the year. Labour accounts for the major share of the costs. Operations are more intensive during maintenance compared to establishment of the technology. The production of nursery plants is not included in the cost estimation. In several cases the trade is combined with the production of seedlings in nurseries, which are sold to land users. In the pastoral zone ANR has led to the marketing of forest products (e.g.gum arabic from acacia trees) and hay/straw in some regions. In addition ANR enhances dairy production and the production of cheese.economic disparities decreased increased Before SLM: NoneAfter SLM: In the short term there is no evident impact.Comment: ANR contributes to reducing economic disparities between vulnerable and wealthy land users in the medium and long term. In the pastoral zone, ANR benefits the entire population. This applies especially to the poorest livestock keepers, who lack the financial resources to buy imported animal feed. Comment: Above-ground biomass increases especially on pastoral and sylvo-pastoral land. An increase is also observed in agricultural fields, mainly due to the high density of woody vegetation.Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%The majority of transhumant livestock keepers in the pastoral zone (60%) have adopted ANR over an area of approximately 2,000 km 2 of grazing land. In the agro-pastoral zone within the regions of Tillabéri, Maradi and Tahoua the area treated with ANR exceeds 10,000 km 2 .Comment: Several projects have adapted ANR by complementing the implementation with tree planting and seeding local or external forage species in sylvo-pastoral land. Some projects have combined the technology with the control of invasive plant species and plants that are harmful to livestock. ANR is based on the selection of species that have high potential for the production and marketing of forage and timber.To which changing conditions? climatic change/ extremes changing markets labour availability (e.g. due to migration) The establishment and maintenance costs of ANR are very low. Therefore the short-term returns are still slightly positive. In the pastoral zone observations show positive returns of the technology, even in the short term. The impacts are clearer in the medium and long term, and the cost-effectiveness is highest at these time scales. • The strength of ANR is that the technology is easy to implement and maintain, and therefore entails very low costs. This has led to the widespread adoption of the technology in all regions. • The second strength is the improvement of soil fertility and the increase of crop and fodder yields. The improved soil fertility leads to an increase in production and improved food security, both for humans and livestock. • The third strength is that resources are being renewed, and that needs for timber and forage are met. According to land users, these supplementary resources enable them to improve their living standards.• The ease of adoption, which has enabled the dissemination of the technology across the country. The technology is a local innovation, which was disseminated and scaled-up by development projects. The implementation and maintenance are in line with the project cycle. • The effect of ANR in reducing the evaporation of soil moisture is a major strength in a Sahelian country like Niger. The ANR technology has positive impacts on the vegetation cover, the soil biodiversity and the density of woody vegetation. These constitute a major advantage in a region subject to accelerated desertification and to the effects of almost chronic droughts. • Conservation and restoration of the environment through ANR are a major advantage in this region of the Sahel, which faces accelerated environmental degradation due to human activities and climate change.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• The impacts of investments in the technology are only significant in the medium and long term. A long period is required to benefit from the results. g Land users should be supported by implementing the technology in the first year in which ANR is adopted, in the form of cash or food for work. • The technology requires that tenure of fields and sylvo-pastoral land are secure. g Establishing community-based brigades to supervise the land under treatment.• Illegal logging both in the fields and in the grazing areas. g Establish a communal system to supervise treated areas in partnership with all stakeholders. • Lack of a monitoring mechanism and of guidelines for the rational use of resources. g The land commissions at the local level and at the level of villages or tribes should be supported to establish community-based mechanisms to supervise and monitor the implementation of laws on pastoralism, and of the rural code in general. • Lack of legislation on forestry incorporating the status of regenerating trees in fields and in the pastoral zone. g The legislation in force should be adapted to the context resulting from the implementation of ANR in fields and in the pastoral zone.Grass reseeding is a sustainable land management practice aimed at rehabilitating degraded pastures and providing livestock feed. This is mainly carried out with indigenous perennial grass species.Grass reseeding is a sustainable land management practice especially appropriate for pastoral and agro-pastoral communities inhabiting the arid and semi-arid rangelands of the world. Seedbed preparation involves clearing of invasive bush patches and creation of furrows across the slope using an ox-plough (traditional) or shallow and light ploughing using a tractor (modern). Grass seeds are sown along the furrows which are created directly in the degraded grazing land. The seeds are lightly covered with soil because the indigenous grass seeds are very small. This encourages faster emergence of grass seedlings. The slope should be generally flat or very gentle (<5%) to reduce the speed of runoff, thus prevent soil erosion and consequently the washing away of the grass seeds. Eroded and deposited seeds will eventually lead to uneven establishment of pasture, mainly concentrated downslope. Minimal soil disturbance by ox-plough or tractor facilitates root penetration of the seedlings and also helps breaking the soil surface hardpan formed by continuous hoof action.Furrows constitute a form of in-situ moisture conservation, capturing rainwater where it falls, thus increasing availability of water for emerging seedlings. The main purpose of this technology is to rehabilitate degraded natural pastures and provide a continuous source of livestock feed especially during lean periods. Use of indigenous grass species e.g. Eragrostis superba, Cenchrus ciliaris, Enteropogon macrostachyus and Chloris roxburghiana is advocated for better establishment and subsequent development. Ecological impacts of this technology include improved soil cover and reduced soil erosion. In addition to rehabilitating degraded natural pastures and improving quality and quantity for livestock production, grass reseeding has additional socio-economic impacts, thus benefiting rural livelihoods. This is through the sale of hay and grass seed and surplus milk in the local market, which provide supplementary sources of income. Grass seedlings emerging along the furrows (Kevin Mganga).15-20 cm deep and 10-15 cm wide furrows across the slope. Spacing between furrows is 15-20 cm and depends mostly on plant species. Seeds are sown along the furrows intentionally built to capture and hold rainwater. Flat or very gentle (<5%) slope to reduce runoff. Seed availability in the 'informal markets' i.e. between farmers and farmer groups, research organisation, influences the cost of grass seed. This is mainly determined by the preceding rainy season.1. Creation of furrow micro-catchments with ox-plough (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of the rains). 2. Sowing (seed placement and covering with soil) (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of the rains). 3. Gapping (reseeding gaps with poor establishment and cover) (Timing/ frequency: After establishment). Comment: Gapping is done to ensure uniform plant cover. Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%This 'Rangeland Restoration' technology is part of a 'Holistic Rangeland Management' approach. It involves clearing of invasive vegetation (predominantly Acacia reficiens) and reseeding with grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) and allowing resting and reduced grazing pressure to rehabilitate degraded communal grazing land.The 'Rangeland Restoration' technology is applied in degraded sites within the 3,100 ha 'core conservation area' (an central area with minimised grazing pressure designated for tourism) and 'buffer zone' (an area surrounding the 'core conservation area' with reduced grazing pressure) of the Kalama Community Wildlife Conservancy (total area: 9,500 ha).The main characteristics are clearing of invasive woody vegetation (predominantly Acacia reficiens) and reseeding with grass (Cenchrus ciliaris). Acacia reficiens (commonly known as red-bark acacia, red thorn or false umbrella tree or thorn) is a native tree or shrub but is considered an invasive species as it can encroach degraded areas with bare and disturbed soil. It is very opportunistic and hardy and can subsequently take over large areas of native vegetation. The invasion can reach a closed or nearly closed canopy with A. eficiens thickets, which are hindering animals to enter and access fodder thus making the area inaccessible for grazing and browsing. Additionally it can be observed that the soil underneath the canopy remains bare and the grass growth seems to be suppressed. As a result the top soil is compacted or forms crusts, which hinder infiltration. During the erratic but heavy rains most of the water flows away as runoff (research in close by areas show that runoff is between 60-80% of the rainfall) and increases soil erosion and further degradation of the land despite a rather good tree cover. Rangeland grass and fodder productivity in these areas are reduced to a fraction of their potential.The main activity is the cutting of the trees and shrubs at a height of ~1 m. The main trunks and branches can be used for fencing, temporary house constructions, firewood and charcoal. Most of the cut trees and the remaining branches are used to spread on the bare land where the trees and shrubs are cut. Underneath this dead material the bare soil receives some cover, which creates favourable conditions and microclimate for termites and other fauna in the soil to brake the hard top soil and crust and enable infiltration of the water during the next rains. This allows regrowth of grasses, particularly in the areas protected by the branches. In the following seasons the spread of the grasses can increase also the the area not protected by the branches. Additionally, seeding with Cenchrus ciliaris (buffel-grass or African foxtail grass), a grass species which is native to most of Africa, enhances the growth of a highly valuable fodder grass. Seeds are hand-broadcasted in the treated areas and germinate during the next rainy season. The first greening is visible in the places where the branches and the wood pieces cover the soil. From there the local annual and perennial grasses start colonising and expanding in the following seasons until, ideally, the whole area that has been bare is covered by valuable perennial grasses. Parallel to the cutting and reseeding is reduced grazing pressure and a resting period over Rangeland Restoration by cutting invasive species and grass reseeding and managing grazing, KenyaComment: Acacia reficiens was already selectively cleared traditionally when constructing livestock corrals ('bomas'), but the introduction of more extensive clearing and grass-reseeding to rehabilitate specific areas was facilitated by Northern Rangeland Trust and Grevy's Zebra Trust.at least one dry season, which is facilitated by the fact that treated areas are situated in the core conservation area or in the buffer zone. This involves the cooperation of the members of Kalama Conservancy, who agree to restrict grazing in the buffer zone and more so in the core conservation area. The exact duration that grazing is allowed in each of these two areas varies year to year depending on drought severity and forage availability. Whereas the grazing pressure by livestock can be regulated, there remains uncontrolled grazing by wildlife. The major herbivores are zebra, elephants and a number of different gazelle and antelope species the grazing pressure by wildlife varies but can be substantial at certain times.Rehabilitating degraded grazing land is the primary purpose of the technology. Other benefits of the technology include: 1) augmented forage availability for the community; 2) increased livestock production; 3) reduced soil erosion and flooding. Land users enjoy these benefits but would like larger areas to be similarly restored. However, the limiting factor is the funding required to pay for labour, which is the major input required for the clearing and reseeding activities. Establishing a market for removing the main stems and producing and selling charcoal is still an opportunity to further explore immediate benefits and cash income in order to pay for the investment into the clearing.Recently treated site with cut Acacia reficies branches laid on bare ground and in erosion gully (Hanspeter Liniger).Site treated approximately 10 years previously (Hanspeter Liniger).Main purpose improve production reduce, prevent, restore land degradation conserve ecosystem protect a watershed/ downstream areas -in combination with other Technologies preserve/ improve biodiversity reduce risk of disasters adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts mitigate climate change and its impacts create beneficial economic impact create beneficial social impactGrazing land -Extensive grazing land: Semi-nomadism/ pastoralism, Ranching Main animal species and products: Cattle (milk, beef), Sheep/Goats (milk, meat), Camels (milk, meat), DonkeysUnproductive land -Specify: Bare and/or degraded land Remarks: The area has been overused and continuously grazed for a long period of time without given the land and vegetation a break to recover. Thus a vicious spiral developed: the reduced grass cover lead to degradation of the soil to compaction and crusting, reduced infiltration thus reduced runoff and reduced vegetation growth, which in turn increased the pressure on the remaining vegetation and thus more base soil etc. Holding membership of multiple community conservancies facilitates the movement between wet season and dry season grazing areas. For example, many of the local communities move their livestock to Losesia, in Sera Conservancy, for dry season grazing. These porous boundaries relieve pressure from Kalama Conservancy during some parts of the year, potentially facilitating recovery of treated areas, but also allows neighbouring communities to access treated areas rendering their grazing management challenging. Comment: These are the costs associated a 55 ha treated area. Six sites of a similar size were treated with similar budgets totalling 279 ha. Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100% Land user's view • Land that was previously considered unproductive is now considered grazing land. • Increased infiltration and decreased runoff and water erosion.Cenchrus ciliaris after 1-2 years provides nutritious forage (particularly the forbs) for livestock.• Decreased impact of the invasive Acacia reficiens on vegetation and soil within treated areas. • Increased biomass of herbaceous vegetation for livestock and wildlife forage. • Augmented biodiversity after reseeded Cenchrus ciliaris replaced by local grasses and forbs.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• Creates overly high expectations from the community regarding the potential to restore larger areas. g Raise awareness among community members regarding the limitations of large-scale restoration. • Lack of funds to pay labourers. Paying community members to undertake restoration activities rather than these activities being voluntary is now, in hindsight, perceived to have been a mistake. g There will never be enough funding as labourers will continue to expect ever-increasing wages. However, over time, community members may decide to restore land voluntarily. Explore the potential for marketing the main trunks for charcoal production of firewood to pay for the labourers. • Controlling grazing in recovering areas. g Raise awareness about the restoration projects within immediate and neighbouring communities. Also, ensure grazing by-laws are implemented and offenders fined. • Land users unwilling to voluntarily take part in restoration activities. g Increase ownership by conducting restoration projects at more local zonal-levels rather than at the conservancy-level. Create additional incentives by using and marketing of some of the wood material (for legal charcoal production).• Inability to provide adequate rest to treated areas (i.e. by controlling grazing pressure) leading to unsuccessful establishment of Cenchrus ciliaris or other herbaceous vegetation in treated areas, particularly in 'buffer zone'. g Implement grazing rules more stringently. • Lack of capacity regarding how to reseed Cenchrus ciliaris in some treated areas. In one case, seeds were buried (as farmers do with maize seeds), which is reported to have contributed to low establishment success of Cenchrus ciliaris seeds. g Capacity building.• Germination and establishment of Cenchrus ciliaris depends on timing in relation to the onset of rains, which are unpredictable and led to unsuccessful rehabilitation of some treated areas. g Provide most accurate weather forecasts available.In Namibia, excess bush is harvested to reduce competition with other plants, especially grasses. Bush can be thinned manually (e.g. with axes), semi-mechanised (e.g. chainsaws) or fully mechanised (e.g. customised equipment). After cutting, the bush is left to dry and then processed into chips or other products.Bush thinning is carried out in Namibia to restore degraded rangeland by stimulating the re-growth of grasses -which are suppressed by excess bush. About 30-45 million hectares are affected by bush encroachment, and this affects biodiversity, groundwater recharge and the carrying capacity of rangeland. There are many causes of bush encroachment, including overgrazing and reduced frequency of wildfires. Most bush encroachment involves indigenous, rather than invasive, species.While natural transitions in the ecosystems may lead to reductions in bush encroachment, active rehabilitation measures are required for the short-term improvements. This is an absolute necessity for many farmers, who experience severe economic difficulties due to the reduced productivity of their rangeland.Bush control comprises responsive measures (bush thinning), follow-up measures (aftercare) as well as preventative measures (good rangeland management). Since vast areas of Namibian rangeland are heavily encroached by bush, the focus is currently on bush thinning. This entails selective harvesting of bush. To determine the density of bush remaining after thinning, a formula based on tree equivalent (TE) and average annual rainfall is used. One TE is defined as a woody tree or bush of 1.5 metres in height.As rule of thumb for attaining optimal bush density, about 30-35% of encroacher biomass should be removed. This is based on research carried out mainly in South Africa, measuring and comparing the re-growth after bush removal. Where too much bush was removed, this often resulted in even heavier encroachment.Bush thinning follows strict environmental guidelines set by the Directorate of Forestry (DoF) through the Forestry Act and the Directorate of Environmental Affairs (DEA) through the Environmental Management Act. This governs the equipment used (to avoid soil disturbance) and the amount of bushes harvested (to achieve a healthy number of the desired bush species). The amount of bushes to be harvested is determined by an expert and depends on various factors.While there is a lack of precise knowledge on the long-term effect of bush thinning, there is no doubt that control has an overall positive effect on the savannah ecosystem in Namibia. The need is widely recognised among land owners and acknowledged on the national political agenda.To render bush thinning economically feasible, value chains have been developed. Through processing and utilisation of the woody biomass, income can be generated. Processed bush biomass can, for example in the form of chips, can be used for thermal and electrical energy applications (e.g. local biomass power plants or biomass boilers for Manual bush harvesting with axes and mechanised processing into wood chips, Otjozondjupa Region Namibia (Cheetah Conservation Fund).Comment: Since the 1950s the phenomenon of bush encroachment has been recognized by farmers in Namibia and counter measures have been implemented over the decades. industry). Currently two such energy installations exist in Namibia, one at a local brewery and one at a local cement factory. In addition, the national power utility NamPower currently considers the construction of a 20-40 MW biomass power plant.Other existing value chains include the production of charcoal, firewood, poles, as well as bush -based animal feed. Further value chains under consideration include composite materials, such as wood-plastic, as well as biochar.Scientific observations have shown, that bush thinning requires regular follow-up. These measures ('aftercare') include the prevention of coppicing and re-growth. This can be achieved by applying aboricides selectively to the cut stems, stem fires or the introduction of browsers (e.g. goats). Research on the effectiveness and possible side effects of each of these methods is limited.A major challenge is the limited suitability of available machines. The process leads to high wear and tear on the equipment (both harvesting and processing technology, (like chippers and pelletisers), often rendering operations unprofitable. Research into, and development of, more suitable machinery is necessary. Other requirements are improved skills training and continuous monitoring of the long-term effects on rangeland.Mechanised bush harvesting using a customised excavator with hydraulic shear (Ohlthaver & List).Manual bush cutting with axes (Cheetah Conservation Fund). Drawing of a bush harvesting site layout. The drawing depicts fully mechanised bush harvesting and immediate processing into wood chips. This set-up is most suitable for large-scale bush thinning, e.g. for the purpose of supplying biomass in larger quantities. Such off-take includes the potential export of bush in processed form (pellets) or energetic utilisation (e.g. local biomass power plants or biomass boilers in the industry). Currently two such energy solutions exist in Namibia, one at a local brewery and one at a local cement factory. Note that a range of bush harvesting methods exist, ranging from fully mechanised (as depicted) to manual bush harvesting (e.g. with axes). The site layout and principles are the same in all scenarios, but harvesting speed and costs differ.The bush harvesting process: Bushes are harvested selectively with and excavator, to which a hydraulic sheer cutter is attached. The biomass is stacked in rows and left for drying some six to eight weeks (depending on weather conditions). The biomass is then further processed with a chipper and collected with a trailer for further transport off the farm (e.g. to a biomass power plant or industrial off-taker). As a rule of thumb, one third of the standing biomass is removed, leaving two thirds standing. Harvesting starts with smaller plants and then moves to larger ones, cutting only plants with 15 centimetres of diameter or less (as per Namibian forestry regulations).Author: M.J. de Wet Pr. Eng., NRGen Advisors (Pty) LTD. (1) Investment in machinery (if not applied manually). ( 2) Maintenance of machinery (high wear and tear due to hardness of wood and high mineral content).(3) Remoteness of farms/land from buyers/ markets.1. Bush harvesting/felling (Timing/ frequency: Year around) 2. Stacking (and drying) (Timing/ frequency: Year around) 3. Feeding the chipping operation (Timing/ frequency: Year around) 4. Transport (Timing/ frequency: Year around)The restorative measure includes bush harvesting/ felling as well as aftercare measures. Additional activities include the processing (e.g. into chips) and transport of the woody material off the farm/ land. Comment: Cost of bush harvesting can be calculated per hectare (e.g. land owner's perspective) or per tonne (in fuel supply agreements with off-takers). All given costs are approximations, as costs vary widely depending on the local framework conditions on a given piece of land. Typically the costs to harvest and process bush on one hectare range from 2,000 NAD to 4,000 NAD.1. Aftercare (Timing/ frequency: Annually)Total maintenance costs (estimation) 500.00Comment: When land is thinned it creates a vacuum in which weeds and woody plants (sometimes more aggressive colonisers than the original encroacher species) will quickly establish themselves. Regular aftercare needs to be applied in order to prevent the excessive re-growth of bush (and therewith new degradation of the land). Various methods are in use to manage the re-growth of bush following harvesting. These include selective application of arboricides, stem burning, and intensive browsing by goats or antelopes. Comment: Bush thinned land takes 3-5 years to fully recover its productive grass layer, thus direct economic benefits are only experienced with a delay.Climate-related extremes (disasters) drought not well at all very wellThe rehabilitation of active gully erosion by re-sloping the banks of the gully in an effort to manage the energy of the water entering the system. Bare soil is protected from erosion by covering it with erosion blankets, brush packing and the establishment of silt fences.This gully reshaping project was conducted in the Mapungubwe National Park in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. The area receives summer rainfall with an annual average of around 600 to 700 mm. Thunderstorms are common. Due to overgrazing on highly erodible soils, gully headcuts are actively migrating upstream. The reshaping technology can be considered for any gully of up to 2 meters in depth (even on duplex -highly erodible soils -gypsum must, however, be added to the relocated topsoil in this case).The purpose of re-sloping is to reduce the gradient of gully heads and sidewalls, thereby reducing the energy of runoff water. This also leads to enhanced vegetation cover and reduced sediment transport in the gully. Resloping of gullies is performed in stages:Stage One: Remove all viable and useful plants in and around the active gully system that will be affected by the reshaping -store these for replanting.Stage Two: Relocate the usable topsoil to the edge of the gully reshape footprint.Stage Three: Reshaping of the gully banks to a 1:3 slope (relative to the new valley floor level after refilling with bank material -see figure). Start by removing the top of the bank and placing it on the gully floor. Make sure to compact the soil from the banks -breaking up clods to smaller particles. Continue to remove more of the bank material and compact it in layers to form a disk shape profile (cross section -see sketch).Stage Four: Spread the topsoil evenly over the newly created gentle sloping profile. Add indigenous grass seed (if available: if not, exotic grasses).Stage Five: Construct silt fences (made of fabric filter cloth -Geotextile) above the water entry points and inside the newly formed profile (around 10 mapart).Stage Six: Cover the area with soil erosion blankets (bio-jute) and/or mulch and/or brush packing with thorny local woody biomass.Stage Seven: Replant recovered plants -protect the area with fences if possible until grass cover established. Gully erosion occurring in the Mapungubwe National Park (J Buckle).Reshaping of the gully (J Buckle). Reslope gully banks from vertical to an approximately 30-degree slope.Silt fences are established above gull head-cut -silt fences inside the reshaped gully -in the region of 10 m apart.Brush packing with thorny biomass to prevent grazing and provide a microclimate for grass seed to germinate and establish.Silt fences are temporary sediment control devices used on rehabilitation sites to reduce sediment movement downhill. A typical fence consists of a piece of synthetic filter fabric (also called a geotextile) stretched between a series of wooden or metal fence stakes along a horizontal contour level.• Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 0.017 ha) • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 12.00 • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: R140/ day Labour availability, soil hardness, availability of material, transport cost.1. Remove plants (Timing/ frequency: 2 to 3 months before the summer rain). 2. Remove topsoil (Timing/ frequency: 2 to 3 months before the summer rain). 3. Reshaping, compacting, layering (Timing/ frequency: 2 to 3 months before the summer rain). 4. Reseeding (Timing/ frequency: 2 to 3 months before the summer rain).5. Soil erosion blankets installation (Timing/ frequency: 2 to 3 months before the summer rain). 6. Silt fences (Timing/ frequency: 2 to 3 months before the summer rain). 7. Brush packing (Timing/ frequency: 2 to 3 months before the summer rain). Author: J Buckle.Maintenance activities 1. After floods restore site (silt fences and brush packing) (Timing/ frequency: After floods). Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%To which changing conditions? climatic change/ extremes changing markets labour availability (e.g. due to migration)Preventative erosion measures above the intervention.Additional feed, or supplements, provided on a regular basis to livestock beyond the normal ration level for increased milk and meat production or in times of drought for maintenance. In emergency may involve (a) fodder collection from within or outside the rangeland area: comprising fresh fodder, hay, tree pods; (b) production or buying of processed or compound feed: namely silage, feed supplements (bales, pellets), urea and molasses blocks, minerals and salt licks, etc.Emergency feeding is especially important in preventing mortality -but also to avoid excessive weight loss particularly in young stock, pregnant and lactating animals. If during floods and droughts livestock are unable to access vegetation for grazing and cannot feed elsewhere, some supplementary feeding is necessary.• Fodder quantity and quality are substituted or added to supplementary feed.• Reduces localised overgrazing.• Is a resilience strategy to cope with shocks and emergencies.• More intensive systems strongly depend on supplementary feeding for animals and require high and balanced levels of energy, protein and minerals at particularly stages of their growth (young, gravid, lactating).Dryland fodder: possible in some rainfed regions especially through cereal crop residues (maize in wetter zones; sorghum and millet in drier areas) as well as legume crop residues (especially cowpeas in the Sahel).Irrigated pastures: (i) intercropped spatially integrating fodder into small-scale irrigation e.g. vetch, cowpea; (ii) irrigated fodder where pastoralism dominates: multiple-cut perennial fodder varieties can be considered e.g. napier grass, or alfalfa (lucerne).Fodder/ forage banks: may be planted, or, more commonly (and traditionally), established through resting enclosures for in-situ conservation and rehabilitation of vegetation as dry-season fodder reserves (e.g. Ngitiri/ Ngitili traditional agroforestry system). Agroforestry (trees integrated with crops and other productive land uses) and silvo-pastoralism (a specific form of agroforestry, mixing trees with pasture) have multiple benefits -including fodder. Land users allow and protect emerging seedlings to grow on their land.Cut-and-carry grazing system: fodder production fed green or conserved to supplement grazing or for fattening or dairy production to livestock that are usually stalled, tethered, or kept in pastures close to home: (i) fresh fodder: rainfed, cultivated -or sometimes irrigated -fodder. The fodder is cut, bundled and fed to herder's own cattle, or sold to livestock traders; (ii) hay making: dried and stored fodder is becoming more common as dry season/ supplementary fodder; (iii) zero grazing is at the fringe of Hay for animal feed and dried manure for cooking fires in Debre May, Amhara, Ethiopia (ILRI/ Phil Norton).In a nutshell rangelands and increasingly belonging to the settled crop production system with various degrees of supplementary feeding.Minerals and salt licks: provide animals with essential minerals as well as salt. These may be from natural deposits or artificial blocks. Phosphorus deficiency (for example) is widespread and acute in SSA. Herders take their livestock long distances for periodic access to natural salt/ mineral licks (e.g. cure salée, Niger).Processed and compound feed: these include silage (fodder preserved through fermentation), urea and molasses blocks.options: Producing and using improved forage for animal feeds is most suited to intensive and semi-intensive dairy farms and mixed systems in the higher potential areas to feed animals on farms with limited grazing. LED could potentially reduce emission intensities by 8-24% in Kenya, and by up to 27% on mixed systems in Ethiopia (Ericksen and Crane 2018).Found mainly in systems where crop production is integrated -'agropastoral' and 'pastures' systems, to a lesser extent in 'bounded without wildlife' system.• Improves utilisation of existing dry pasture.• Meets livestocks' requirements and potential by providing extra (and balanced) nutrients.• Improves production to ensure that meat or milk quantity and quality targets are met.• Reduces pressure on vulnerable pastures to avoid overgrazing and ensure that pasture growth rates are optimised. • Offers additional source of income.• High cost of implementation.• The direct impact on the land and its health is minimal in extent.Little used in the traditional pastoral systems of SSA but is increasingly employed under agropastoral regimes as grazing land is diminishing. The more intensive producers, especially those with stall-fed animals based around cut-and-carry and having access to markets of such supplements are aware of the value of supplementary feed (e.g. hay, cakes, molasses, mineral licks).The adoption of the different technologies are from low to medium, as many are closely dependent on external financial support. There is often a lack of availability of quality seed and suitable land. There are furthermore insufficiently developed fodder markets.After identifying the area to \"be closed\", ditches and terraces are constructed using stones combined with grasses and/ or multipurpose shrubs such as vetiver grass, dinsho grass, sesbania trees, etc. Commonly, the shared benefits from area closures are green fodder or hay for livestock (cut-and-carry), timber from plantations, and honey. https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/1599/ Hay and apiculture for youths' income generation (WLRC, Gizaw Desta).Open access to land is reducing, land fragmentation increasing and grazing mobility more and more restricted. To adapt pastoralism, eight Maasai households in Kajiado County have decided to venture into intensification and joined efforts to set aside land for haymaking and build a storage. Reseeding has led to good cover of leafy grasses, and cutting grass to a protective mulch/ litter layer on the soil surface. In the predominantly annual cropping systems, free grazing livestock often damage crops and are a cause of conflict. However, farmers observe that crop yields have declined due to nutrient mining and soil erosion on steep slopes. Stall-fed livestock is an efficient method to produce organic fertilizers (manure) and reduce labour by cutting and storing fodder for use over a period instead of grazing in distant pastures daily. Alliance farming is partnership between pastoralists and subsistence farmers to share resources. They agree to use the same land and related resources sequentially: growing crops during the rains, and grazing cattle in the dry season. It is a further development of the conflict mediation process under which cattle are allowed to graze on cropland after harvest. The cattle consume crop residues and weeds (including some grass) on the farm and they produce dung and urine in turn, which increases nitrogen content and organic matter in the soil. This enhances its fertility and makes it more productive for the next round of crop cultivation. The crops grown are mainly annuals including maize, beans, soybeans and groundnuts. The livestock are mainly zebu cattle for beef (Bos indicus). There exists several variants (or components) of this arrangement: 1) The farmer constructs a night paddock (a corral) in farmland and invites pastoralists to kraal their animals in the paddock overnight; 2) The farmer arranges with the pastoralist to farm on areas where animals have been held overnight, in grazing land -and constructs a fence to protect the crops; 3) In communities where transhumance is common, the farmer allows a pastoralist to graze his cattle on crop residues remaining after harvest; 4) Pastoralists allow farmers to collect dung and apply it in their farms. Contracts for the most part are verbal and non-written, and each party counts on the good conscience and honesty of the other. No. of Technology sites analysed: 100-1,000 sites Geo-reference of selected sites • 10.52037, 6.37028 Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area.Date of implementation: 2011; less than 10 years ago (recently).through land users' innovation as part of a traditional system (> 50 years) during experiments/ research through projects/ external interventionsComment: Some aspects of this technology were already in practise in the region over the decades but due the facilitation of Mbororo Social and Cultural Development Association (MBOSCUDA) this technology is being adopted now by many locals.Alliance farming beneficiary in Boyo Division (Mboscuda North West Region).Alliance farming beneficiary: crop farmer in Boyo Division (MBOSCUDA North West Region).Alliance farming beneficiary: pastoralist strategically herding his animals between fences erected by farmers in Wum, Menchum Division.(MBOSCUDA North West Region).Main purpose improve production reduce, prevent, restore land degradation conserve ecosystem protect a watershed/ downstream areas -in combination with other Technologies preserve/ improve biodiversity reduce risk of disasters adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts mitigate climate change and its impacts create beneficial economic impact create beneficial social impactPurpose related to land degradation prevent land degradation reduce land degradation restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land adapt to land degradation not applicableGrazing land -Extensive grazing land: Nomadism, Semi-nomadism/ pastoralism Main animal species and products: Zebu cattle under extensive production which produce dung and urine.Mixed (crops/ grazing/ trees), incl. agroforestry -Agro-pastoralism Main products/ services: Annuals such as maize, beans, soybeans and groundnuts, while livestock kept under extensive system of production produce dung and urine to enrich the soil. • Alliance farming is an advanced outcome of the conflict mediation process whereby cattle are allowed to graze on crop lands after harvest.• Livestock consume crop residues and weeds (including grass).• When the land is used to paddock cattle, their manure and urine fertilize the soil making it more productive when the crop farmers return to cultivate. • Crops are planted on the plot of land once the cattle are taken away.Most important factors affecting the costs• Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 0.5 hectares) • Currency used for cost calculation: FCFA • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 569.495 FCFA • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 1,500.00 FCFA The only costs pertain to herding the animal to farmer's farm which is done by pastoralist or his a herder he has paid.1. Farmer harvests annual crop e.g. maize, beans (Timing/ frequency: At the end of growing season which is usually in October). 2. Farmer invites pastoralist to bring herd to graze off crop residues (Timing/ frequency: After harvest of crops in October). 3. Cattle graze on crop residues and weeds on farm (Timing/ frequency: During grazing in the dry season from mid-November onwards).4. Dung and faeces passed out by animal increases N content of soil (Timing/ frequency: During grazing, mostly in the dry season mid-November to mid-March). 5. Pastoralist takes animals away from farm (Timing/ frequency: At the beginning of the rains in mid-March). 6. Farmer then returns to till soil and plant annual crops in the field (Timing/frequency: At the beginning of the growing season by mid-March). Comment: Soil organic matter has also being improved from the increase crop residues which animals do not eat all.invasive alien species increased reduced Before SLM: -1After SLM: 1Comment: The spread of alien species such as bracken fern on rangelands is being controlled since farmers are being invited by pastoralists to come and cultivate crops on rangelands. The tilling of the soil is a good mechanical method of controlling the spread of these invasive species.Short-term returns Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%More than 800 alliance farming pairs have been facilitated by this process.• Technology leads to increased crop yields because of the improved soil fertility. • Technology leads to improved crop quality because of the use of organic manure and less chemicals fertilizers. The use of chemical fertilizers can lead to leaching of inorganic nutrients into ground water, and also eutrophication of water bodies. • It has led to stronger social relationships between farmers and pastoralists. • Invasive species such as Pteridium aquilinium (bracken fern) that has invaded rangelands is being controlled. Tilling of the farms is a mechanical method of stopping its growth and spread.• More productive use of land than when two land uses were separate. • More environmentally friendly since organic manure is being used.• The ratio of pastoralists to farmers is really low (about 1:6) meaning that there are not many pastoralists to form Alliance Farming pairs with willing farmers. g Increasing herd sizes to ensure more production of manure could alleviate this problem.• Agreements are verbal. g Formalizing the contracts.• Some variants of the technology, for example that in which pastoralists allow farmers to collect dung to go to farm in another area may lead to nutrient export. The dung does not contribute to improve the fertility of the soil where it was collected but does so at a different site where farming will take place. There is no net loss of nutrients out of the whole system though. g Transportation of dung to different sites should be discouraged. Farming should take place as much as possible on the farm that supplied crop residues to feed the animals. High quality fodder for livestock is made by mixing chaff of elephant grass (Pennisteum purpureum) and calliandra (Calliandra calothyrsus) with maize bran, cotton seed cake and molasses. These fodder pastures are grown on a 10 acre piece of land and harvested twice a week for chopping into chaff. For calliandra (a leguminous tree), leaves are harvested while elephant grass is cut at ground level. This vegetation is transported to the electric chaff cutter by tractor. At its best, the chaff is evenly cut, free of dust, of good colour and has a fresh aroma. The chaff is chopped into small pieces which allows for easy mixing with supplements. Chaff in Uganda can be produced on farm or purchased from commercial chaff cutting mills, which grow pastures and process them for sell to farmers during pasture scarcity in the long dry spells.The farmer in Bushenyi District learnt the technology at a trade show. Today, he processes fodder for his 50 dairy cattle under an intensive system. His grazing/paddock land is about 20 hectares in total and is divided into 8 paddocks which are used in rotation. The cows graze for 8 hours daily. Every evening their diet is supplemented with the processed fodder in the milking parlour. The fields are allowed to mature at intervals to produce a continuous supply of grass for fodder throughout the growing season. The fodder processing procedure includes:i) Cutting mature pasture grass at ground level and collecting the grass from the fields;ii) Transportation of elephant grass and calliandra from the fields to the fodder shed;iii) Offloading and sorting of pasture grass/ fodder into different classes of similar diameter and lengths for easy handling during chaff cutting; iv) Chopping of pastures/ fodder into small pieces using the electric chaff cutter; v) Mixing the chaffed fodder, cotton seed cake, molasses and maize bran to improve the palatability and nutrient quality of the chaffed fodder.vi). Putting the processed fodder into troughs for cattle to feed on during milking.Processing enough pasture grass into chaff for cattle feeding is described by the farmer to be a relatively expensive and a labour intensive process. The key expenses in establishing the system include costs of buying fodder (if not readily available on the farm), purchasing a chaff cutter and buying supplements. The farmer requires 0.5 tonnes of chaffed fodder mixed with supplements to feed 50 dairy cows on a daily basis. The main costs are labour, fodder supplements, the electric chaff cutter, tractor hire and daily operation costs.Dairy cattle fed with supplementary fodder (Uganda)Ebinyasi bye ente DESCRIPTION Dairy cattle feeding on fodder in the parlour (Amon Aine). The fodder cut into small pieces mixes easily with supplements to make a well nutrient balanced ration. This is palatable and encourages cattle to eat non-selectively and without spilling,hence minimizing wastage. The processed fodder is easy to store in bags and can be kept on wooden pallets raised off ground in a cool store. The farmer notes that the chaffed fodder can further be processed into hay or silage for storage to be fed to cattle during the seasons of pasture scarcity, especially the long dry spells of early June to late August and early December to late February. The system enables the farmer to keep more productive animals on his land than he could using other feeding regimes: in other words this is an intensive system that maximizes production per unit area.Inside the fodder shelter: a bundle of sorted fodder awaiting chaffing (Aine Amon).The farm with paddocks, fish ponds and tea (Amon Aine). • pastoralism and grazing land management • integrated crop-livestock management • improved plant varieties/ animal breedsThe process is for making high quality pasture supplement for cattle.The key requirements for the system are the fodder shed, chaff cutter and sources of pastures Total costs for establishment of the Technology 5,683,000.00Maintenance activities 1. Cutting and collecting of mature elephant grass (Pennisteum purpureum),and calliandra (Calliandra calothyrsus) to one point in the fields. (Timing/ frequency: each morning.) 2. Transportation of pasture grass to the fodder shed. (Timing/ frequency: After cutting.) 3. Offloading and sorting of pasture at the fodder shed. (Timing/ frequency: None) 4. Chopping of grass into small units using the electric chaff cutter. (Timing/ frequency: None) 5. Mixing the chaff with supplements. (Timing/ frequency: When the pastures are well chopped.) 6. Feeding the processed fodder in troughs. (Timing/ frequency: 30 minutes to milking time at dusk.) Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology single cases/ experimental 1-10% 10-50% more than 50%Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so without receiving material incentives? 0-10% 10-50% 50-90% 90-100%Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions? yes no FEEDING SRM Technology Dairy cattle fed with supplementary fodder, Uganda• The animals feed in the paddocks during the day and are supplemented with more palatable fodder at the milking parlor, to improve their diet. • The nutrient quality of the fodder is supplemented to make a more balanced ration for the animals. • Under this semi intensive farming system, more animals can be reared per unit area in contrast to a paddock-only system.• The farmer can further process the pastures into hay or silage for storage. • The animals are not so much affected by pasture scarcities.• There is chance to irrigate the pastures to cope with the long dry seasons.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• Expensive to maintain. Production of enough grass at one go and storage for use in the next few days. g Production of enough pastures at ago and storing them for use in the next few days.• Need for labour for processing. Further mechanization of the process. g Further Mechanization of the process.Compiler: Aine Amon (aine3amon@gmail.com) Infrastructure improvement includes the establishment of water points, wells, boreholes, ponds, pans and dams (fed by macro-catchments), floodwater spreading, trenches, drinking water quality protection, livestock corridors, and access roads and transport routes for animals and livestock feed. Infrastructure implies structural measures that allow greater mobility of livestock herds, and rangeland management improvement -particularly regarding access to water resources and pasture.Water sources in the arid and semi-arid lands include natural rivers, springs, waterholes and constructed sources such as shallow wells, boreholes, dams, ponds, sand dams, subsurface dams and berkads -underground cisterns common among Somali pastoralists.Rivers are open to all, whereas springs, boreholes and dams might be managed by government institutions, privately or at a community level. These differences in user rights have implications for water and rangeland management.• Water availability is a grazing management tool: areas without water may be underutilized. • Strategic placement of waterpoints can provide for healthy livestock and sound rangeland conditions. • Development of water resources and its management must be designed carefully to avoid accelerated degradation through prolonging access to water and thus forage or polluting water points. • Emergency situations can be addressed through infrastructure (e.g. stock passage routes) that permits ready access to forage and water, and markets.Water supply/ water points: wells and boreholes (artesian or pumped), dams, pans and ponds. Various methods of water harvesting and storage are used in semi-arid, such as berkads (cistern) in Somalia and hafir (dug tanks) in Sudan.Floodwater spreading and storing: spate irrigation has been traditionally practised: (a) floodwater harvesting within streambeds (e.g. water-spreading weirs); (b) floodwater diversion, where the floods -or spates -from the seasonal rivers are diverted into adjacent embanked fields. Sub-surface dams and sand dams are weirs, built on impermeable rock layers, in rivers, which dry seasonally. They hold back subsurface flow -which is then stored in sand behind the structure.Livestock/ transhumance corridor: formally defined passageways, which channel the movements of livestock herds through farming areas by linking pastures, water points and corralling areas. The main goal is conflict prevention between agriculturalists and pastoralists regarding the use of limited land and water resources. Characteristics include:Water supply for livestock at Dangol borehole, Mopti, Mali (Amara Keita).In a nutshell Transport roads and marketing infrastructure such as access to markets for animals and feed, slaughter facilities, holding grounds -as well as veterinary clinics -are central to rangelands and can be the difference between maintaining economic livestock enterprises and the inability to make a viable living.General infrastructures: schools, grain banks, and health centres are also essential to livelihoods in the rangelands.Applied in 'agropastoral' and 'pastoral' systems as well as 'bounded without wildlife' and 'pastures' systems.• Improves accessibility of water all year round -or seasonally. Reduced distances covered and time spent in search of water for livestock. • Allows recovery of vegetation and biodiversity • Provides effective measures for adapting to climate change in regions experiencing increasing variability in rainfall. • Improves resilience of pastoral communities.• Reduces conflict incidences (depending on the situation).• High technical expertise required; management and often external material support needed. • Often expensive for establishment as well as maintenance (e.g. building materials, transport, labour). • Maintenance often proves to be the bottleneck to rangeland communities.• Can lead to conflict (depending on the situation).• Need continuous planning and development in order to be able to adapt to changing needs. • Potential loss of pastoral culture and traditional practices.A minimum level of infrastructure is needed in all rangeland systems and must include flexibility to changing needs. Improvements in rural infrastructure, overall, are rare in the Sahel. In West Africa, there are a number of established transhumance corridors (western and eastern), which depend on continuous infrastructure support and improvement. Information about corridors, water and overnight resting points could facilitate decision-making and policy. Road construction and rehabilitation are currently common across the rangelands of East Africa, spurred to a large extent by external investors. Spate irrigation is found quite widely but particularly in the Horn of Africa (van Steenbergen 2010). Water spreading weirs need specific natural landscapes, large wide-spread valleys with low slopes. They have been applied in Burkina Faso, Chad, Ethiopia and Niger.There is a small to moderate trend towards spontaneous adoption of measures to improve infrastructure and some self-help groups have started pooling together their resources for implementation.Livestock corridors in Niger are regulated through the \"code rural\". Internal corridors are negotiated in a general village assembly involving all stakeholders. For external corridors the involvement of transhumance herders and neighbouring villages is indispensable. Once an agreement is achieved, demarcation with stones and/or selected tree species is carried out by the local land users -with financial and technical assistance of the government or NGOs. https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/3358/ A herd of small ruminants on a well established \"couloir\" (Fodé Boubacar Camara, PAFN Niger).The size of the excavated groundwater collection ponds varies depending on the area available, groundwater level, slope and soil characteristics. In this case study they are 4 m long, 3 m wide and 1 m deep (12,000 l capacity), the slope is moderate (5-8%) and the soil is a deep clay loam. Water troughs (known as Elyato locally) are constructed adjacent to the pond to allow livestock access to clean drinking water. https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/3880/ Cattle drinking water from a trough, Missenyi, Tanzania (Allan Bubelwa).Under the \"modern sustainable pastoralism\" concept several practices were promoted: establishment of water harvesting structures, better passageways for herds, improved fodder production as well as optimal and efficient distribution of water points. The latter assures a balanced distribution of herds, and thus avoids overuse of vegetation around a limited number of wells. Herds waiting to be watered in southern Somalia (Wolfgang Bayer).A modern hydraulic complex in the centre of the Sahelian region of Burkina Faso for watering livestock in the dry season.The well called 'Forage Christine' was constructed in 1971 by a French engineer, which named it after his wife, and opened it for the first time in 1972. Due to conflicts between Burkina and Mali it was ruined in 1976, and then again in 1985. In 1996 the National Office for Wells and Boreholes (ONFP), a government agency, rehabilitated the well and made two supplementary boreholes. The complex consists of a main well with an operating flow rate of 120 m 3 /h, having a submersible pump of brand KSB, type OPA 150s-65/8, and a pump capacity of 60 m 3 /h. Next to the main well there is a secondary well, which is equipped with a hand-operated pump with a capacity of 18 m 3 /h. The energy for pumping water from the wells is provided by a generator with an engine of brand DEUTZ (type: F3 -6L 912) and a switch of brand LEROY SOMER -Type LSA 42.1 L8L C1/4, a voltage of 400 V and continuous power of 50 kW. The generator has a switch and a battery. A diesel tank with a volume of approximately 9 m 3 was installed for the power supply to the generator. The pumped water is stored in an elevated water tank, which is located at a distance of about 200 m from the well, and has a volume of 50 m 3 . The water from the elevated water tank is distributed to four artificial ponds with a dimension of 50 m x 50 m x 1.5 m at equal distances on all sides of the central reservoir. The water is conducted to the artificial ponds through PVC piping, which is buried underground over a distance of 8 km, or 2 km for each pond. The water flow is controlled by nine valves of type Nr. 4000, Reg. Nr. W 1.129, installed on the pipes. The hydraulic complex was installed in 1996 by the National Agency for Water and Sanitation (ONEA). The complex is managed by the livestock keepers through the User Association of 'Forage Christine' (AUFC). The statutes of this organisation were adopted on 2 May 2014. The well is managed according to a set of requirements which specify the terms for access to water: date of opening and closure of the well, the amount to be paid per animal and the management of the cash money provided.'Forage Christine' is a major water infrastructure, established in the northern part of the Sahel region in Burkina Faso between longitude 0°45'W and latitude 14°48'N, providing drinking water to herds within an area of 100 to 300 km from its central location between Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger. It was established in 1971 in the context of major droughts that had affected the Sahel, and it was opened for the first time in 1972. It is located in the middle of the Sahel region of Burkina Faso, at two km from the pond of Tin-Arkachen in the department of Déou, at approximately 45 km from the capital of the department, and 85 km from Gorom-Gorom. At the sub-regional level, the well is a around ten km from the border with Mali, and at 100 km from the border with Niger. The climate is of Sahelian type, and has a rainy season of 3 to 4 months (from June-July to September), which is subject to strong temporal and spatial variations in precipitation, and a dry season of 8 to 9 months. The climatic conditions are characterized by highly irregular winds, precipitation, evapotranspiration and moisture due to fluctuations in atmospheric circulation patterns. Annual precipitation is around 500 mm on average, with roughly 30 rainy days, and is marked by significant inter-annual variations. The stream network of the region consists of several streams, with one permanent river: Béli. To this river, ponds and many depressions are connected, which disappear after the month of January. The soils are very diverse in general, and mostly of sandy texture. They do not provide a good medium for plant growth due to the low permeability, which reduces water infiltration. Therefore water availability appears to be one of the major limitations for rainfed agriculture, in addition to the limited retention and availability of nutrients. According to the phytogeographic division of Burkina Faso (Fontes and Guinko, 1995), the area of 'Forage Christine' is situated in the northern or strict Sahelian phytogeographic sector. This sector is characterized by a set of typical Saharan and Sahelian vegetation species which mainly occur in shrub and woody steppes (49%) and grassy steppes (24%), which form the larger part of the rangelands. This vegetation provides the most important natural grazing land to livestock.With regard to the human environment, the last General Population and Housing Census mentions a population of 25,321 inhabitants for the municipality of Déou. Yet this number varies significantly due to the seasonal migration of people from other regions to use water and forage resources. The ethnic groups in the region are mainly Fulbé, Kurumba, Songhai, Tuareg, Mossi and Hausa people.Economic activities in the region are livestock keeping, farming, craftmanship, fishing, trade, tourism and hunting. Several socio-economic groups are guiding these activities. Some 60 farmer groups, 53 groups of livestock keepers, six of which for female livestock keepers, and three organisations for environmental protection. With regard to infrastructure for education, sanitation and socio-economical conditions, the municipality of Déou has three markets, 18 schools, one middle school, 47 permanent functional literacy centers (CPAF), one recreation centre, six cereal banks, three healthcare and welfare centers (CSPS), three medical stores, one tourist camp and one financial institution.Farming and livestock keeping continue to be the most important socio-economic activities. The agricultural crops produced include millet, sorghum, maize, cowpea, rice and groundnut. In 2009, a total area of 345.5 ha was sown for these crops. The Sahel region in Burkina Faso has excellent conditions for livestock keeping. The animal species found in the region are mainly cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, camels, donkeys and horses and poultry. Several facilities and installations for water supply to pastoral areas are available in the region, as well as storage facilities for agricultural and agro-industrial by-products (SPAI) and infrastructure for trade and animal health care. The municipality of Déou disposes of one reservoir, five artificial ponds, 43 firm wells, ten vaccination centres, one store for agricultural and agro-industrial by-products (SPAI), one animal shelter, a facility for slaughtering and a livestock market.Animals drinking at the main pond of 'Forage Christine' (SNV). Author: SNV.Most important factors affecting the costs The municipality, the management committee and the NGOs operating in the area (SNV).Comment: The soils are very diverse in general, and mostly of sandy texture. They do not provide a good medium for plant growth due to the low permeability, which reduces water infiltration.Comment: Limited water availability appears to be one of the major limitations for rainfed agriculture, in addition to the low retention and availability of nutrients.Habitat diversity high medium low • Existence of a temporary coordinating committee on the site of the well, acting as an interface between the authorities and the livestock keepers using the well. • The arrangement of the use of the artificial ponds according to the terms set by the authorities and the technical services. • Monitoring of animal health and informing the livestock keeping service in case of suspected infectious diseases.• Water availability and access to water for users when the well is operational; potential users are willing to contribute to the operation of the well. • Water availability for livestock.• Strong involvement of the authorities and the technical services in issues relating to 'Forage Christine'. • Implementation of several methods to solve management problems. • Good organisation of the management of the water source.Land user's view • Lack of transparency in the use and management of contributions intended to cover the functioning and the maintenance of the generator and the wage of the guard, who also operates the generator and supervises the related installations. g Good functioning of the management committee and committee meetings will enable to overcome this disadvantage. • A low level of representation of the different population groups in the management committee (only the Djelgobé of Gandéfabou are members; these people settled in the area in Boula and claim to be the indigenous people in the area). g Involving all groups using the well more closely in order to have an appropriate representative in the management committee. • Lack of consultation between the management committee and the livestock keepers having their residence in the area. g Stimulating the management committee to communicate more closely with the neighbouring livestock keepers through a framework for consultation on the way in which they manage the infrastructure of the 'Forage Christine'. • Insufficient awareness of the roles and responsibilities of the management committee by the livestock keepers (only the role of the guard is known to the livestock keepers). • The undemocratic establishment of the management committee (self-appointed members), which explains why livestock keepers consider the committee as an imposed structure.• The non-involvement of livestock keepers (potential users) in the management of the well in some management methods (concession to RMC); their weak involvement in the management of the well, and their continued low representation in the committees (2 to 3 persons). g Involving livestock keepers more closely in the management committees and in the decision-making bodies related to 'Forage Christine'. Increasing the number of representatives of livestock keepers in the management bodies of the well. • The failure to address the concerns of livestock keepers in the implementation of the management methods. g Ensuring that the livestock keepers are considered by the management committee, and that they can effectively participate in the committee.Climate change/ extreme to which the Technology How the Technology copes with these changes/ extremes is exposed Climate-related extremes (disasters) drought not well at all very well• The inappropriate use of contributions from users of the well for operating the facilities of the well in a sustainable way. g Ensuring that the funds generated by the well are managed properly by the management committee. • Competition for water between humans and animals. g Providing wells or pumps for human consumption of water. • Huge inflow of animals which overgraze the area, thereby threatening the environment. g Raising awareness among livestock keepers and herders on the need to manage the natural resources properly in the area influenced by 'Forage Christine', with the aim to mitigate the environmental degradation that could result from overgrazing. The technology functions as underground water storage infrastructure and the typical activities include, excavation of top porous soil, excavation of sample pits within the excavated area, checking filtration rates of soil, compaction of soil on which dam liners are laid, smoothing the sharp liners along which the dam liners are laid, making grooves to anchor the dam liner, laying the dam liner, anchoring the dam liner with a mixture of cement, water proof and sand with water (motor) and finally drying of the motor and filling back of sand.The development of Subsurface Dams (SSDs) was done through Cash for Work programme where local labours comprising of 40-50 persons are engaged in excavation, compactions and developing the liners. Farm tools like jembe, panga, spades and human labour are required to develop the SSD. The technology improves water supply/availability, thereby extending the period of livestock grazing in areas where typically water is depleted before the pasture hence improves water access for livestock in ways that support wider management and utilization of the rangeland and as such strength the resilience of pastoralists to droughts. This effectively gives pastoral groups, an extra grazing time (typically 2 extra months), a period usually not too long to encourage land degradation through over-grazing but long enough to enable pastoralist utilize the remaining pasture in wet season grazing areas. In so doing, the technology enable balanced use of vast communal lands without livestock retreating to dry season grazing areas.In the process of the landscape level participatory planning with the communities: i) they identified different challenges, including need for decommissioning certain water points that they consider are contributing to over grazing and also attracting other communities, hence drive frequent conflicts, secondly, ii) they mapped areas in the rangeland where there is mismatch between water and pasture availability, most of these areas are in wet season grazing areas. So the next discussion was on what strategic water infrastructures that will enable herders to graze for 2-3 extra months to enable them utilize the grass before they migrate to the traditional dry season grazing areas. So by design, the technology should only yield water that can allow settling for those extra months, not longer to the detriment of the rangeland.Excavation at Leyhele (IUCN archieve). Comment: Subsurface Dams are only suitable in areas along the river, with suitable density of sand deposits.through land users' innovation as part of a traditional system (> 50 years) during experiments/ research through projects/ external interventionsThe technology was instrumental in fostering both balanced utilization of land and strengthening sustainable use of the vast rangeland by ensuring that herders utilize available pastures in the wet seasons grazing areas before moving to dry seasons grazing areas. The water stored through the technology stays longer, in this case study, the water lasted for 5 months after the end of the rainy season.The area receives bimodal rainfall, long rain in March-May and short rain in November-December. With changing seasons/climate, the dry seasons can last up to 1 year in case of rainfall failure. Typically, dry seasons are 6-7 months (May-November).Normally, the water is depleted within 2 months after the rainy period. The technology is also cheap and easy to understand and construct (especially in areas with clay as the underlying impermeable material) with a possibility of the communities to be taught how to identify suitable site and the entire process of construction. However, in areas without clay soil, the excavation of clay and transportation can be labour intensive and expensive.Excavation process (from IUCN archive).(IUCN archieve).Main purpose improve production reduce, prevent, restore land degradation conserve ecosystem protect a watershed/ downstream areas -in combination with other Technologies preserve/ improve biodiversity reduce risk of disasters adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts mitigate climate change and its impacts create beneficial economic impact create beneficial social impactGrazing land -Extensive grazing land: Semi-nomadism/ pastoralism Comment: Communal grazing area that is shared by 2 and more pastoral groups.Water supply rainfed mixed rainfed-irrigated full irrigationLivestock density: Fluctuates, depending on seasons and pasture availability.Comment: Mismatch of pasture and water resources -there are areas where pastures are plenty but surface rain water is depleted earlier than pasture.Purpose related to land degradation prevent land degradation reduce land degradation restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land adapt to land degradation not applicableThe SSD technology increase water availability is period immediately after the rain, hence ensuring better pasture utilization and more sustainable use of land.• pastoralism and grazing land management SLM measures structural measures -S5: Dams, pans, pondsThe SSD has initial excavation works. The construction of the SSD was constructed by 50 labourers. The area of excavation is subdivided into 45 square chambers of 4x2.3x2.2 = 20.2 m 3 (not to scale). Each of the chambers were excavated by 5 labourers. The estimated time for excavation as per the plan was estimated to be five days. Excavation and transportation of the clay from the clay pit was estimated to take an approximate of five days while the compacting of the clay will follow one week later, and laying out of the concrete and refilling of the sand for another week. The liner will then be finally placed. In summary, the excavation of sand takes 5 days, and the excavation of clay soil takes another 5 days while concrete placing, compacting of clay as well as putting of liner and refilling of sand takes 10 days. Establishment activities 1. Removing sand over dyke and man-days for excavating and transporting soil to dam site (Timing/ frequency: 21 days for 45 casual labourers). 2. Building and compaction soil in dam wall (Timing/ frequency: 3 days for 45 casual labourers). 3. Supplying water for compaction (Timing/ frequency: 0.5 day for 45 casual labourers).4. Back-filling sand on dam (Timing/ frequency: 1 day for 45 casual labourers). 5. Supplying water for compacting clay in dam wall (Timing/ frequency: 2 days for 45 casual labourers). 6. Compacting soil and placing liners (Timing/ frequency: 12 days for 45 casual labourers).Author: Guyo Roba. Community based natural resource management (CBNRM) refers to the collective use, management and planning of natural resources, and gives rural communities a stake in the management of their land (small to medium-scale) and a feeling of ownership. It reduces poverty, inequality and exclusion, vulnerability and risks faced by the rural population especially the poor. CBNRM involves organisation of communities, formation of user groups to plan and govern improved management of the natural resources -namely vegetation, soil, water and animals. It includes land use planning at the local scale. Savings groups may also be formed. CBNRM combines the generation of economic benefits for rural communities.-Build from the community level, involving land users and their initiatives from the beginning to the end. -Ensure participatory and collaborative planning, activities and accountability, involving and giving communities responsibility at all stages. -Identify and build on community-based traditions, innovations and adaptations.-Develop links connecting a wide span of stakeholders from community-based organisations (CBOs), to non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to the government (GOs), and international organisations (multi-stakeholder integration).Local level participatory planning: involving all land users and communities in planning, implementation and evaluation.Participatory resource mapping: enabling communities to jointly plan rangeland management through consensus. They map out in detail the resources they depend on, the qualities they attribute to these resources, who uses them, who depends on them and how they manage them.Joint rangeland management planning: involving all livestock keepers, seasonally, in planning how they manage livestock and as well as cropland to improve livelihoods through informed, sustainable use of their resources, in an equitable manner.Pastoralist field schools and demo sites: pastoralist field schools are \"schools without walls\" that introduce good agricultural and marketing practices while building on local knowledge through hands-on experimental and participatory learning 1 . Demonstration sites can help accelerate the adoption of innovations alongside traditional practices.Conflict resolution: e.g. dialogue platforms, alliances, information sharing and decision making forums. All aim to prevent -or resolve -conflict.General assembly of the pastoralist field school \"Champ Ecole Pastorale\", Niger (Mahamane Abdoulaye).In a nutshell The \"Rangelands Initiative Africa\" is working to make rangelands more tenure-secure. The Social Tenure Domain Model (STDM) recognises that secure tenure builds confidence among the resource users, and therefore promotes confidence in investment at different levels: small-scale, large-scale, urban and rural investors who all benefit from security of tenure.Savings and pasture user groups and/or associations: Savings groups are composed of individuals who save together and take small loans from those savings. They are a powerful economic and social development platform, enabling minor investments and acting as a type of insurance buffer in cases of stock loss etc. 2 Savings groups (SGs) are especially prevalent across sub-Saharan Africa (e.g. rotating savings and credit associations (ROSCAs)). 3CBNRM is mainly relevant to systems where crop production is integrated -'agropastoral' and 'pastures'. Also, found in 'pastoral' and 'bounded with wildlife' systems.Main benefits -Close interaction and exchange between the different stakeholders (land users, NGOs, local government officials, SLM specialists, universities). -Can provide a science-practice link.-Capacity built through \"learning by doing\" (e.g. through field schools).-Inter-community dialogue in natural resources sharing and access.-Conflict resolution and mitigation.-Danger of poor financial management.-Lack of accountability from the leaders -and lack of demand for accountability from the members. -Conflicting group and individual interests.-Lack of a written constitution and grazing by-laws to reinforce traditional decision making.CBNRM is the most \"natural\" way of managing common resources (pastureland and water) in agreement and inclusion of all concerned. There are new initiatives to \"restore\" CB-NRM by the formation of user groups. Customary land tenure systems play a major role in rangeland governance. Pastoralists have (or have had) strong traditional institutions that play a significant role in regulating natural resource use and conservation, manage risks, protect resources and promote collective action. Improve and utilise legal frameworks, institutions, governance, and policies.2 https://seepnetwork.org/Thematic-Areas-Savings-Groups 3 http://sg4africa.org/ Dialogue platforms (DP), Cameroon DP facilitate consultations in managing rangelands. They bring together rangeland users including farmers, pastoralists/ agropastoralists to learn, discuss and implement low stake conflict mitigation strategies and mutually beneficial alliances. In alliance farming they agree to use the same land and related resources sequentially: growing crops during the rains, and grazing cattle in the dry season. The Pastoral Field School (PFS) approach was the key development tool used in the FAO project entitled 'Improved food security, livelihoods and resilience of vulnerable pastoral communities in the Greater Horn of Africa through the pastoralist field school approach'. The project was implemented between June 2011 and July 2015 and targeted agropastoralists in the West Pokot and Turkana areas of Kenya, the Karamoja area of Uganda and Borena and Guji Zones of Ethiopia. Indirect beneficiaries included Non-governmental organisations (NGO) and development actors involved in PFS actions across the region, largely through capacity building. The project was implemented through FAO regional and country offices in close collaboration with selected implementation partners in the countries, including communities, both local and international NGOs and governments.The PFS approach is an adaptation of the Farmer Field School (FFS) approach. The FFS approach emerged in South East Asia in 1989 as a way to better engage farmers in a field-based enquiry for participatory identification and adoption/adaptation of solutions to local problems. The approach builds on the principles of adult and non-formal education, and experimental and emancipatory learning with a focus on learning processes and building analytical capacity as opposed to traditional extension approaches that focus on top-down dissemination of information to farmers. The PFS approach was first tested in 2006 in Kenya by FAO, Vétérinaires Sans Frontières Belgium and the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).A PFS can be described as 'school without walls' that introduces new pastoral techniques and practices (including SLM technologies) while building on indigenous knowledge, with community empowerment as a result. Through experiential and participatory learning techniques applied in a group setting (25-30 members), with regular meetings over a season/production cycle, (agro-)pastoralists learn how to analyse their situation and make informed decisions about their livelihood practices and resource use strategies. When empowered to make informed decisions and adapt to changes in the environment, community members are better able to support disaster risk reduction and mitigation of climate change impacts. A facilitator (trained by an experienced field schoolmaster trainer and with a good understanding of pastoral issues) guides the learning process and ensures that the group activities are interlinked with a community managed disaster risk reduction plan. The technical topics covered can include animal production and health, pasture and range management, dryland farming, livestock fodder production, community-managed disaster risk reduction and alternative incomes. The informal nature of the approach fur- Mobility is an important factor to be considered in PFS as it bears on aspects such as the frequency and location of meetings. In some cases, PFS activities have to be interrupted during pastoral movements while in others the facilitator has to follow the field school group during migration. Agro-pastoralists may not always be available to participate in PFS activities as they may spend many hours or days with their livestock in search of water or fodder. Generally, PFS has a longer cycle than groups focusing on small-scale farming, and flexibility is needed when unforeseen events disrupt learning activities. Pastoralists and agro-pastoralists often live in conditions of high environmental uncertainty.Pastoralist field school meeting (FAO). PFS member presenting the results of the agro-ecosystem analysis (AESA) during a PFS session (FAO).To strengthen the capacity of pastoral communities and support improved natural resources management and disaster risk management to reduce food insecurity vulnerability.• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: Pastoralists were able, committed and willing to work in teams and to invest their time in PFS learning activities. -The community had a positive attitude to change and the local culture allowed for innovations.• Availability/ access to financial resources and services: PFS activities, learning and group action facilitated leveraging of financial resources and services. All PFS groups developed savings and credit schemes.• Institutional setting: Efforts towards institutionalization enhanced PFS sustainability, improved quality, and strengthened impact and continuity.• Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: PFS facilitators received technical support from subject matter specialists (e.g. animal scientists, veterinarians, agronomists). The specialists were invited to the PFS by the facilitators whenever technical inputs and assistance in designing appropriate experiments were needed. -SLM technologies/ PFS practices were built on indigenous knowledge and local practices.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: Promoting the use of locally available resources (e.g. agricultural and livestock inputs) was crucial to ensure PFS sustainability and the continuity of PFS activities.Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach• Collaboration/ coordination of actors: Networking among implementing actors and key stakeholders could have been stronger.• Policies: The PFS approach wasn't part of Government structures and procedures, so no enabling policies were in place. Implement Pastoralist Field School in the Borena zone.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).FAO was responsible for overseeing the overall implementation of the intervention, providing mentoring and technical support, create platform for harmonizing the field school approach and allocate required resources for implementation, provide guidance on linkages with related regional pastoral initiatives. The overall day-to-day management of the project was led by FAO's Resilience Team for Eastern Africa (RTEA), drawing on the technical expertise and experience of its headquarters in Nairobi, Kenya and its Subregional Office for Eastern Africa in Addis Ababa. Activities in Ethiopia were supported by the FAO Country Office. FAO field offices implemented the project in the targeted field locations, in collaboration with Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Government partners.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). none passive external support interactive self-mobilizationThe PFS approach was presented to pastoral communities and their leaders as well as to local stakeholders (e.g. local government, development partners) to seek buy-in and collaboration. planning Needs, priorities and opportunities for improvement were identified through a consultative process with the community before and throughout PFS implementation. The PFS members, not the facilitator, decided what was relevant to them and what they wanted the PFS to address. implementation As per PFS principles, the pastoral community was involved in all activities during project implementation and had a decision-making role. The dissemination of PFS practices/SLM technologies was encouraged among members and pastoral communities.Exchange visits (educational tours to other PFS), field days (getting non-PFS members involved in PFS activities), and share fairs were organized to promote trade and exchange of ideas. monitoring/ evaluationThe expansion of monitoring and evaluation tools and processes was part of the regular PFS implementation, with exercises and tools embedded in the PFS sessions to assess progress and allow members to take corrective action based on the results.impact assessment A major achievement of the intervention was the participatory impact assessment. The assessment was conducted using a mix of methods, including focus group discussions with PFS members, case stories, semi-structured interviews and scoring of perceived change before and after PFS membership.Phases and steps of Pastoral Field Schools. The following activities or services have been part of the approach Capacity building/ training Advisory service Institution strengthening (organisational development)Advisory service was provided on land users' fields at permanent centres Comment: PFS are 'schools without walls' where capacity is developed from existing local knowledge. They are learning by doing and problem based, on the fields/ rangelands of the community. PFS usually comprises a group of 25-30 pastoralists who meet regularly in a local field setting, under the guidance of a trained facilitator. They make observations on livestock production and rangeland ecosystem, focus on a topic of study, and compare the effects of alternative practices. As a result of the observations and analyses done directly on-site, participants make decisions on how to improve their practices. All PFS follow this systematic action learning process where the key steps are observation, reflection, group discussion, analysis, decision making and action planning.Training was provided to the following stakeholders land users field staff/ advisersThe curriculum of PFS groups generally focused on: methodology and implementation, participatory learning and facilitation, group management and technical topics.Some of the technical topics covered by the facilitator include gender, NRM, nutrition, forage production and health, conflict management, business skills development, village community banks (VICOBA), rangeland management, soil and water conservation and community-managed disaster risk reduction (CMDRR), and water scheme management.The following services or incentives have been provided to land users financial/ material support provided to land users subsidies for specific inputs credit other incentives or instrumentsAnnual budget in USD for the SLM component < 2,000 2,000-10,000 10,000-100,000 100,000-1,000,000 > 1,000,000Comment: The budget range above refers to the costs incurred for implementing a single PFS within the project. Financial/ material support provided to land users Each PFS group received direct grants of USD 940 for their learning activities and to purchase inputs for PFS experimentation.no yes, little yes, moderately yes greatly Did the Approach empower local land users, improve stakeholder participation? PFS enabled and empowered pastoralists, their families and pastoral communities to understand and respond to local challenges. PFS members improved their understanding of the environment, obtained knowledge and learned additional skills which lead to improved capacity to manage available resources. PFS groups showed a greater level of cooperation and mutual help compared to the situation prior to the PFS project. PFS groups demonstrated enhanced capacity to seek self-generated solutions to problems identified by the group, generally developed through the experimentation and field analysis component of PFS, which in turn positively impacted on adoption rates of new practices and technologies.PFS helped pastoralists to develop the skills required for informed decision-making in their environmentAs PFS members carried out PFS practices themselves and saw the direct results of the processes, they took ownership of the innovations and decisions on their livelihood activities. This was further enhanced by reduced production costs and the proceeds which the groups received from PFS practices that encouraged the members to continue with the efforts since they paid off.Did the Approach lead to improved access to water and sanitation?Water for human and livestock use was improved through the improved water management practices applied by the group.Did the Approach lead to more sustainable use/ sources of energy? By closing off grazing areas, shrubs and trees were also protected. These species can be a source of fuelwood, but are often degraded.The PFS members developed different alternative income generating activities which range from petty business especially for women, beekeeping, purchasing animal for fattening and re-sale, and purchasing and sale of animals without fattening. • This activity has improved the status of women through enabling them and offering them a greater spectrum of livelihood options. • PFS activities increased the awareness on sustainable management of the natural resources. This is an achievement as the PFS communities increase their income diversity and income generating capacity facilitated through natural resources. • The groups decided by discussion on emerging issues to be dealt with. This built considerable coherence within the group and ensured that those topics that were important were selected.• The PFS approach in general contributed to generating increased, appropriate and self-defined livelihood options.Members have therefore the opportunity to improve their livelihood portfolio by spreading their activity base and thus prepare better for emerging challenges of greater variability than the community is used to. • The opportunity for members, especially women to meet, discuss at equal level with men and focus on problem solving. This is very much appreciated in a community setting where tribal institutions are respected. PFS groups show a greater level of cooperation and mutual help as compared to the situation prior the PFS intervention. • The approach does not rely on highly trained external advisors but on pastoralists' own discovery and reflection. It can function well even with facilitators of relatively low technical skills. This allows for scaling up of interventions more easily, since solutions are obtained jointly through an experimentation process.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome Land user's view • Attending PFS sessions requires time and effort, something participants not always have. g This is mostly a problem at the beginning. As soon as it becomes clear to participants what the added value of the approach is then they are perfectly fine with putting in the required effort and time. It is therefore important to make clear right from the beginning what the (expected) benefits to participants are. • Quality of implementation of PFS largely depends on the organisational, communication and methodological skills of facilitators as well as on their regular availability throughout the FFS cycle. In some instances, poor quality of facilitators has led to inadequate experimentation and ecosystem analysis. g Continuous support is required to improve the facilitation skills of facilitators. • Aligning PFS approach into the government extension system requires commitment of policy makers. g National platforms, policy makers visit of PFS activities and use of public media are some the mechanisms for creating awareness for institutionalizing PFS into the government extension system.• There is room for improving experimentation and linking it more strongly to an ecosystem analysis. g Better training of facilitators. • While taking up the issue of conflict and conflict management, the approach does not always fully cover the complete socioeconomic interconnections that the problem of conflicts in pastoral areas is linked to. g Make sure that a detailed socioeconomic analysis is undertaken before the interventions start. This will help in ensuring better coverage of all the complex relationships and interconnections. • Different institutions implement PFS differently. g Harmonization of the field school approach is critical among the field school practitioners.Olkiramatian Group Ranch strengthened the capacity of its community governance structures and began to engage in more rigorous implementation of seasonal grazing plans. This was based on traditional ecological knowledge and rangeland management practices. The group ranch incorporated conservation, research, and joint rangeland management planning with neighbouring communities.Prior to implementation of the approach described here, rangeland management was carried out through customary institutions supported by a group ranch committee. However, many challenges hindered effective management of livestock and natural resources. These included:• Poor financial management.• Lack of accountability from the leaders -and lack of demand for accountability from the members.• Conflicting group and individual interests.• Lack of a written constitution and grazing by-laws to reinforce traditional decision making.To minimize and overcome some of these weaknesses, the African Conservation Centre (ACC), a conservation NGO and Southern Rift Association of Land Owners (SORALO), a Maasai land trust, worked with Olkiramatian and other communities to help them strengthen their planning and governance and to reinvigorate the traditional system of grazing management. Initially, ACC worked with the community's governance and resource management committees to build local capacity for decision-making and resource management. Institutions previously responsible for resource management, which had existed under traditional systems, had begun to weaken from both internal and external pressures, undermining the long-term sustainability and equity of rangeland management. The group ranch emerged as the key modern institution within this community and needed to be strengthened to support traditional management. To do this several sequential steps were taken:(i) First, the group ranch committee instituted a more objective way of identifying and electing office holders, to ensure a credible base for resource governance and building consensus among resource users;(ii) Registration of group ranch members was re-initiated to ensure equal access and rights to resource use, and to provide clarity around membership;(iii) Institutions responsible for rangeland management, including the group ranch committee, and the conservation and grazing subcommittees, were reinforced primarily through the strengthening of internal capacity;(iv) ACC facilitated a process for consolidating the group ranch's governance and by-laws to help guide the implementation of the strategy, including enforcement; (v) The group ranch implemented provisions for holding leaders accountable, allowing the group ranch members to demand their rights;(vi) Decision-making processes were facilitated by laying down procedures for sharing information and apportioning responsibilities among the leadership -as decided at annual general meetings;(vii) Rangeland monitoring groups and rangers, mostly local youth, were trained and positioned;(viii) Finally, the Lale'enok Resource Centre was established, together with community enterprises based on the use of natural resources. A women's group was included.An important catalyst in the approach was the establishment of a community conservation area and lodge within the group ranch for the development of wildlife tourism. The conservation area capitalized on the existence of the community's dry season reserve where wildlife such as zebra and giraffes were abundant, which is only grazed by livestock after pasture is utilized elsewhere. This creation of a conservation area, coupled with the desire to generate revenue through tourism with its semi-exclusive access rights to parts of the conservation area, worked to reaffirm the traditional grazing management strategies by preventing settlement within the conservation area and encouraging longer resting of pasture following rain. This happened alongside the development of a research programme, which has helped to put community rangeland management on an evidence-based foundation.With guidance, the community revised its grazing plan and zoned its land into four resource use areas, now embodied in the new group ranch constitution:-Conservation or wildlife areas (which then allowed the creation of the conservancy); -Agricultural/crop production areas; -Livestock grazing areas (dry season and wet grazing areas); -Human settlements.The grazing sub-committee of the group ranch makes and implements decisions on livestock access to certain areas, with pasture rested between and across seasons. The conservancy is rested from livestock grazing as a 'grass bank' during the wet seasons, which can last up to 6 months. Settlement areas are also tightly managed under this approach to preserve pasture heterogeneity and prevent local degradation. Fines are imposed on herders who break grazing regulations. On a rolling basis the communities now utilize traditional ecological knowledge, ecological monitoring and expert knowledge, to reassess these grazing regimes under changing conditions. These rangeland management activities are also nested within joint, inter-community planning such as regular meetings of the grazing committees of clusters of group ranches.To enhance sustainable livelihoods for pastoralist community members through informed, sustainable use of their resources in an equitable manner.• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: Uniform ethnicity. Communal land tenure. The pre-existing customary institutions and the group ranch committees. The government decree on the establishment of group ranches. The strong traditional and cultural knowledge about rangeland and livestock management.• Institutional setting: The group ranch was already established and practicing planned grazing according to customary rules.Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles • Availability/ access to financial resources and services: Financial resources are limited for the group ranch committee; they depend on small collections at local markets and some donor financing to enact projects.• Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: Low capacity of the many community members to tap into the existing knowledge bases. Lack of technical capacity to address specific research needs identified by the community.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: Low livestock prices at the grassroots present a challenge to the growth of the livestock value chain. A solution may be the facilitation of more direct market linkages.• Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): There is a strong body of legislation developing in Kenya to ensure sustainable use of rangeland resources. This includes the new Community Land Act (2016), which creates local governance institutions with protection of grazing; the Wildlife Act (2012), creating community conservation areas and allowing benefits and compensation from wildlife; the Water Act ( 2016) and the Water Resource Users Association encourage multi-user analysis and cooperation to protect the quantity and quality of water for all users within a catchment.• Land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement): The group ranch committee is the highest decisionmaking body. There is a grazing sub-committee which manages the details of seasonal grazing patterns.• Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: The community is networked to researchers and technical experts from institutions including ACC, SORALO, Universities and TATA chemicals; through the Lale'enok Resource Centre. Mobile phones and access to internet has enhanced access to technical information. There is a wealth of traditional knowledge within the older generation who understand the requirements for sustainable management of the landscape.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: Livestock markets within reach of the community members -the Shompole crossborder livestock market is in the neighbouring conservancy.• Workload, availability of manpower: The community members are involved in the process as part of their lifestyle. Planned grazing made it easier for them to take of their livestock and reduce the number of people required to herd their livestock.Olkiramatian Group Ranch. none passive external support interactive self-mobilizationThe community invited ACC to come and support conservation work and improve ecotourism. A visiting researcher from ACC identified opportunities for reinvigorating the group ranch structure and nature-based enterprises. The work of the researcher contributed to the approach, but the ultimate push came from the community. planningThe community evolved into an organized group and was determined to employ good resource practices to improve the rangelands and the lives of the people. They sought the help of ACC in strengthening their capacity to fundraise and improve community enterprises. SORALO was established to continue supporting the community in networking and supporting the conservation work. implementationThe committee members, the individual members implement the approach. SORALO and to a less extent ACC, play advisory roles. The community members provide labour and time as their in-kind contribution. ACC help the community raise funds for the implementation. monitoring/ evaluation With guidance from SORALO, monitoring is done by community members. The various committees have a monitoring component in their work. research At the beginning, research was done by a scientist from ACC.Later on in the approach, the community youth have been trained and are actively involved in research activities.Adaptation to evolving challenges through the community's governance structure -the group ranch committee -is at the centre of the approach.IMPACT ANALYSIS AND CONCLUDING STATEMENTS no yes, little yes, moderately yes greatlyAs the approach was community-driven with decisions and actions fully in the hands of Olkiramatian members, this has bolstered them to carry on. In the early days, one of the support organisations-ACC-helped ensure more transparent decision-making and selection of leaders, and stronger accountability to group ranch members. The approach is based on ensuring strong, community-led governance. This has been achieved and is likely to be sustained.• The approaches emanates from a strong community with a working customary rangeland management structure. Communal ownership of land and the community's sense of belonging and customary (tribal) right of access and use of natural resources all make it easier for the approach to be successful.• The approach is a bottom-up one that builds on traditional resource management practices, adapting them to evolving social, economic and biophysical conditions. This contributes to strong sense of community ownership. • As a community driven and implemented the approach, the cost is minimal. With the incorporation of the conservation/wildlife tourism component, a secondary source of income for the community structures and some individuals in the community is realized. • The climatic conditions that allow extensive livestock production and wildlife is also another advantage for the approach. The landscape lies between Nguruman escarpment on one side, Lake Magadi on the northwestern part and the Amboseli/ Mt. Kilimanjaro on the southern part. These contribute to some degree of isolation and protection of influxes of herders from other locations. • The demonstrated success of the grazing management practices put in place has led to changed decisions and management practices reinforcing the community's willingness to continue with the system.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• There is concern among some community members about the incorporation of conservation activities potentially leading to restrictions on mobility and access to pastures. g Continued awareness raising about the benefits and pre-empting misunderstandings about the conservation activities. • The community success in rangeland management is sometimes viewed as a source of failure. This is because the community holds some customary beliefs and norms that allow for practices like reciprocal grazing by other pastoralists on their land. In the case that Olkiramatian is the best quality grass bank during extended droughts, livestock from other communities flock there and mostly cause overgrazing, degradation, and social conflict. g The idea of SORALO networking all the landowners in the southern rangelands and are helping them establish similar approaches means the whole rangeland in southern Kenya will become a continuous, homogeneously managed landscape. Land & water use planning, in general, includes the establishment of concepts and management plans for conflict management, livestock and wildlife routes or corridors, set-up of water points, resting, rotation, facilitation of multi-level support, multi-stakeholder interaction and agreements, and support for improved medium to large-scale planning and implementation of rangeland practices. Land and water use planning is \"the systematic assessment of land and water potential and of economic and social conditions in order to select and put into practice those practices that will best meet the needs of the people while safeguarding resources for the future\" (FAO 2003).-Facilitate planning process and tap the wealth of experiences and the lessons learnt.-Enable capacity for development and negotiation of plans with all stakeholders.-Clearly define the boundaries of the planning area and include relevant interactions of stakeholders. -Create a platform for planning and negotiation.-Allow a rolling planning and adaptation to include changing needs and conditions. -Include modern technology using satellite images as basis for the development of plans. -Establish early warning systems and drought risk management plans and strategies (access to dry season/drought/ emergency grazing grounds and water points). -Take a regional perspective in managing transboundary pastoral resource use and related conflicts.Approaches that work with both government and communities to plan beyond administrative boundaries are:Participatory rangeland management (PRM): addresses land access and tenure security, integrated and collaborative management approach between the various stakeholders.Participatory land use planning (LUP): multi-level support and multi-stakeholder user agreements and interaction supports evidence-based planning, protection and management of shared resources across village boundaries, and watersheds.User groups or associations: e.g. to set bylaws and to share rangeland resources equitably. Or self-help groups who plan regular and efficient cooperation among the livestock keepers and negotiates with land owners regarding access issues.Territorial and watershed multi-stakeholder approach: offers a structure to build consensus among individual communities and development partners on natural resources/ territorial or watershed management and development issues 1 . Conflict management (livestock routes/ livestock corridors, resting, rotation). Reported from all rangeland use systems but especially from 'agropastoral' systemthough only once from 'parks & reserves'.-Allocating land use to meet the needs of various people while safeguarding future resources. -Including up-and down-stream interactions.-Promote SRM by involving multiple stakeholders and seek to strike a balance among the diverse, and often conflicting, interests of these actors and making claims and rights spatially and temporarily explicit.-Land use planning is becoming complex and multidisciplinary as planners face multiple problems that need to be addressed within a single planning framework. -Difficult to plan the management of such approaches at large-scale, thus decision-makers and land users need to work together for positive results. -Highly dependent on the perception of stakeholders and attitudes to the approach.Key to land use planning is to coordinate current and future societal needs, while minimising the potential for conflicts. Interventions that provide opportunities for reflection, feedback, and adaptations are better positioned to cope with new challenges and problems (identified and solved in a participatory manner), and therefore are more likely to be sustainable in the long term.Pastoralists have (or have had) strong traditional institutions that play a significant role in regulating natural resource use and conservation, manage risks, protect resources and promote collective action.The key for adoption is that people appreciate that the adoption of land use planning, through appropriate management practices, enables land users to maximise the economic and social benefits of land, while maintaining or enhancing the ecological support functions of its resources. Capacity building is crucial also because these approaches combine technologies, policies, and activities aimed at integrating socio-economic principles with environmental concerns: these are complex exercises that need to be guided.This approach transfers the responsibility of sylvo-pastoral resources management from the state to user associations. A local convention defines the rules, in particular for access, use and control of shared resources. The implementation of the convention is governed by a monitoring system. Two stages are necessary: (i) the transfer of management rights to the rural municipalities concerned, and (ii) the delegation of the management mandate by the municipalities to \"Collective Local Management Associations\". Between 2001 and 2011, the transfer of state management created forty local user associations. Since 2011, the approach has been applied by associations without project support, but with monitoring by state services and municipalities. https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/3720/ Silvo-pastoral protection zone (Karl-Peter Kirsch-Jung).Students of the Namibia University of Science and Technology learn how to operate a dumpy level for marking contour lines (Ibo Zimmermann).Multi-stakeholder meetings are organised to align visions of the different parties in an inclusive way and ensure investments. Terms of reference are drawn up at the beginning, data collection initiated and presented to all actors for informed decision-making. The aim is (i) to ensure that all actors involved in developing lowland areas participate in the planning process and (ii) to prepare the ground for the self-management of the lowland scheme from the outset of the process. The goal is to steer the identification and prioritisation of interventions carried out by local authorities towards the actual needs of local people. Interventions are agricultural (dams, ponds) or pastoral (improving rangeland, cattle market, route marking). https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/2831/ Prioritisation of investments using an inclusive approach (HELVETAS -Swiss Intercooperation).This approach involves multiple actors, and is based on cooperation between them in the border region between Benin and Niger. The aim is to handle the concerns of livestock keepers practicing transhumance, who are victims of harassment and conflicts related to access to resources for livestock. It is a framework of exchange between the various actors in charge of managing the mobility of livestock keepers across the border.The approach aims at the appropriation and application by the multiple stakeholders of the community legislation on transboundary transhumance -as adopted by the Economic Community of West African States (CEDEAO). The context is increased competition for access to natural resources, exacerbated by the effects of climate change. The approach consists of: (i) implementing a framework for cooperative management of transboundary transhumance between Benin and Niger; (ii) ensuring wide dissemination of community legislation of the CEDEAO on the management of the transhumance practices, and (iii) enabling conflict-free and sustainable access to resources for livestock keeping in the two countries.The main methods used are: (i) the development of the Scheme for regional Land Management (SAF); (ii) building the necessary infrastructure for livestock keeping (marking of corridors and grazing areas, restoration and management of rangelands, establishment of vaccination centres, etc.); (iii) the raising of awareness among livestock keepers, through the organisation of livestock keepers on the ground (grassroots land commission, local committee of transhumance); (iv) the organisation of transboundary and local for a; and (v) monitoring of the implementation of recommendations forthcoming from the meetings.The process took place in several stages: the actors of the civil society and the livestock keeping services first identified, together with the livestock keepers, the difficulties related to the transhumance in the two countries. Next they proceeded to inform the livestock keepers and farmers about the community legislation of the CEDEAO. Under the responsibility of the authorities of the two countries, transboundary and local fora were organized periodically to discuss difficulties related to transhumance. The census of all transhumant livestock keepers enabled facilitation of the delivery of travel documents (International Certificate of Transhumance -CIT -and identity document). The committee for receiving the transhumant livestock keepers was established and is functional. It is composed of municipalities, the civil society, and heads of the livestock keepers. Its role is to receive and guide the livestock keepers and to facilitate their stay. A mechanism has been put in place to monitor the implementation of the decisions and recommendations during the periodic meetings between the parties.The regional council is the contracting authority, and ensures the general coordination of the process, and the monitoring of the recommendations. The administrative and customary The regional council planned the activity following discussions with livestock keepers from the region. planningExchanges with the livestock keepers to specify problems and to suggest appropriate strategies and actions. implementationThe initiative to practice transhumance and the compliance with regulatory requirements are within the competence of the livestock keeper. monitoring/ evaluationThe communities provide useful information and take decisions regarding solutions.Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles Organisations of livestock keepers (NGOs and associations).Social mobilization and awareness-raising among the livestock keepers.Local and regional authorities: Regional councils and municipalities.Programme management, general coordination of the process, facilitating the issuance of civil status documents.Swiss Cooperation in Niger, Vétérinaires Sans Frontières, Belgium.Funding the process Accompanying the process.The monitoring and evaluation are integrated in the steering of the process through periodic cross-border meetings, and are operated by the regional council with the support of PASEL7.Annual budget in USD for the SLM component < 2,000 2,000-10,000 10,000-100,000 100,000-1,000,000 > 1,000,000Comment: The funding is provided by PASEL7, a programme financed by the Swiss Cooperation in Niger, and implemented under the lead of VSF-Belgium. In the long term, it is envisaged that the actors themselves will be fully in charge of financing the approach.IMPACT ANALYSIS AND CONCLUDING STATEMENTS no yes, little yes, moderately yes greatlyThe compliance with the procedures for transhumance, as defined by the CEDEAO, has slightly improved. Hence the number of International Certificates of Transhumance issued since the start of the approach has increased from 6 to 216.The meeting takes informed decisions based on consultation with the livestock keepers and the administrative and customary authorities. Initially interviews were held to collect the needs and information from the livestock keepers.The livestock keepers have better understood the community regulations (CEDEAO) on transhumance, and the challenges of compliance.The different stakeholders collaborate regularly and exchange information, which facilitates the management of the transhumance on either side between Benin and Niger.There has been a sharp decrease in conflicts between farmers and livestock keepers, as well as acts of violence towards the transhumant livestock keepers. Before the approach was implemented, there were regular arrests by the border authorities in Niger for conflicts related to transboundary transhumance; these have now become sporadic.Did the Approach improve issues of land tenure/ user rights that hindered implementation of SLM Technologies?The approach has enabled the clarification of the ownership status of certain grazing areas, and has strengthened the proportional representation of the grass-roots land commissions.The free movement across the border of the transhumant livestock keepers facilitates the access to the livestock markets in northern Benin. As a result, livestock keepers are now well supplied with live cattle. The approach has fostered contacts between the actors involved; they only need to ensure their continued accountability. The results which have already been achieved will enable actors to sustain the approach in the long term. Considerations will be made on how to secure funding by the actors themselves. The Land Management Scheme will serve to guide such an approach to manage the mobility of livestock keeping.The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has been using a participatory approach to implement large-scale restoration of degraded land in the Sahel. Communities have been central to the programme. In the framework of the Great Green Wall initiative, adapted and useful native tree species, shrubs, and fodder grasses are planted in agro-sylvo-pastoral land. This is response to community needs and preferences while ensuring that the species and varieties are all ecologically suitable.The approach is implemented under FAO's Action against Desertification (AAD) programme in the Great Green Wall for the Sahara and the Sahel Initiative (GGWSSI). This is Africa's flagship initiative to combat the effects of climate change and desertification, and to address food insecurity and poverty. It brings together more than 20 African countries with international agencies, research institutes, civil society and grassroots organisations. Through the GGWSSI, the vision is a mosaic of sustainable land use practices and productive landscapes stretching across North Africa, the Sahel and the Horn.Community participation in the Great Green Wall restoration initiative is through a people-centred approach to rangeland management that puts communities at the heart of efforts. It focusses on plant species that support their livelihoods. Specifically these are a selection of well-adapted indigenous trees, shrubs and fodder grasses with proven resilience to drought and usefulness in restoration. Village communities decide on which areas to plant and on the species that they can utilise for food, for fodder, and for medicines. There are also plants that produce economically valuable goods for local, national and even international markets, such as gum arabic (from Acacia senegal) for example.Technically, AAD supports the implementation of land restoration activities through provision of equipment, and by strengthening the technical and functional capacities of individuals, communities, and organisations in restoration techniques and sustainable land management.The three main objectives of this approach are: a) Poverty alleviation; b) Ending hunger; and c) Improving resilience to climate change.The restoration approach is based on a five-step model:-Communities: needs and requirements for restoration are determined through in-depth consultations with communities.-Research: good quality seed is made available for the propagation of economically viable, locally adapted and biodiverse vegetation.-Operational procedure: efficient operational restoration processes are ensured, including land preparation and management, assisted natural regeneration and planting. A woman sows a 'half-moon' after its construction in Tera, Niger.(©FAO/Giulio Napolitano).Farmers harvesting hay in Tera, Douma, Niger (©FAO/Giulio Napolitano).-Monitoring: field performance of species are evaluated, as well as communal activities such as maintenance and management of restored areas.-Capacity development: village technicians' capacities are upgraded in forest seed collecting and nursery techniques, planting, maintenance and management of restored areas, and development of plant products, marketing, and local business management.Key elements and aims of this approach include:• Planting the right species in the right place.• Promoting the use of quality native forest and fodder seeds for restoration.• Ensuring that a wide range of useful plant species is made available.• Managing natural regeneration of species and planted areas through village management committees.• Updating a species database for gene-pool traceability, monitoring, reporting and for future uses of data and information.• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: The approach is people-centred, and builds on traditional management of land, traditional ecological knowledge and techniques such as 'half-moons' (demi-lunes in French) for rainwater harvesting that facilitate improved plant establishment.• Availability/ access to financial resources and services: Individuals can acquire finance to buy seeds. On community land, finance may be needed to lease land for production of plant varieties, or for hiring labour to take care of seedlings.• Institutional setting: Better organisation at local level enhances community participation and commitment to achieve interventions at large-scale/community level.• Collaboration/ coordination of actors: There are various levels of collaboration needed for example in establishing which land should/ can be used, in seed selection based on defined needs, and also for the provision of labour. Fundamentally, collaboration is key to agreements to achieve the desired objectives.• Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): Securing access rights to land and water resources is a motivation for investing in reforestation.• Policies: National level policies can protect and ensure supply of seeds as well facilitate access to natural resources such as land.Additionally, policies such as those in support of Great Green Wall activities create an enabling environment within which these activities can be supported.• Land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement): Similar to legal framework above.• Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: Knowledge around SLM contributes to maintenance and management of restored areas, thus ensuring sustainability of activities. The programme has integrated existing/traditional SLM activities such as zaï (wide planting pits)/half-moons in capturing, concentrating and storing water thus keeping soils moist and improving the chances of good plant growth in a very dry environment.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: Market access and increasing economic capacities of communities can enable active involvement in restoration especially when plant products can earn income thus facilitating local business.• Workload, availability of manpower: Availability of labour facilitates activities such as forest seed collecting, nursery activities, planting, maintenance and management of restored areas. Most of the work is done by women who prepare the land and take the lead in planting. Communities' local knowledge, needs and aspirations were the backbone of the project. Communities were extensively consulted on species identification and prioritization based on needs, including speed of production, personal knowledge and aspirations. This was through questionnaires and village workshops. Commitment and buy-in from the community was also a prerequisite for activities to start, as they had to commit to contribute land and in-kind labour. Selection of villages for restoration was based on, amongst other things, motivation and commitment by communities to participate in restoration activities, and community-based structures and organisations. planningExtensive planning was done with communities before implementation, e.g. to agree on planting times, use of traditional techniques and land preparation. implementation Implementation was done actively with communities who volunteered traditional knowledge as well as labour to the activities. This built on the initial procedures where species were selected and prioritized; planning of activities; and later labour in preparation of land, setting-up nurseries and transplanting. Comment: This is a local initiative that uses traditional ecological knowledge and multi-purpose plant species (of known benefits to the local communities) for restoration. Community participation, lifestyles and preferences and a careful analysis of ecological landscapes are carefully considered and then matched to suitable interventions. This similar approach has been applied by other projects in the GGWSSI region however although has not often been formally disseminated to wider audiences. The use of participatory mapping is not new in seeking to capture communities' understanding and use of natural resources. These maps are typically drawn on the ground using stones, sticks and other locally available materials to depict key features such as schools, water points, and forest areas, etc. However the process used in Isiolo County combines digital mapping with community-drawn perception maps. This offers a number of extra benefits. While fully capturing the wealth of local knowledge, they contain an in-built coordinate system which corresponds to a global reference grid, enabling their linkage to maps used in formal systems. Furthermore, the coordinate system provides a geographically precise basis from which to discuss natural resource management, making outputs of participatory mapping more universally usable. These benefits, however, need to be carefully balanced to avoid the risk that through this process, pastoral resources -which are highly dynamic -are 'frozen' in time and space. The participatory mapping process has adopted GIS workflows within community workshops, enabling the creation of integrated, consistent and standardized geospatial information. The process follows seven steps:Step 1: Community level meetings to develop perception maps drawn on the ground and/or on paper. The product is a community perception map of those resources that are important for their livelihood systems. This map should be created in a community setting to enable the participation of a large group. Several maps may be produced by smaller sub-groups (women, the youth, elders etc.) and then amalgamated. The final map is then copied onto paper.Step 2. Digital mapping is introduced. This step takes place in a workshop setting with a smaller group of key informants chosen by the community -as well as county government planners and technical staff. The presence of the latter is critical to the process of 'legitimizing' community knowledge. Following a quick explanation of satellite imagery, Google Earth is projected onto a wall alongside the perception maps developed under step 1. The use of Google Earth is only for orientation, and to enable participants to navigate the imagery and to cross-reference their paper-mapped key resources against the satellite imagery. iting platform. This produces the coordinates that pinpoint the locations of natural resources in a manner that can be independently and objectively verified. The highly interactive process of geo-referencing local knowledge to a coordinate reference system allows resource maps to be produced to any scale, and in real-time, with the community.Step 3. Qualitative and quantitative attributes describing the key resources are collected. As participants add features to the map, they also describe their specified characteristics or attributes. Attribution data includes a fuller description of the physical characteristics of the resource (e.g. soil type, waterquantity and quality, pasture species) as well as issues concerning their management (e.g. under customary or modern management, land tenure status, negotiated or paid access, area of conflict). Updating this data on a regular basis adds temporal and trend data to the spatial database. This underlines the need to structure data systems well to manage time-based data and to record updates. Steps 4-6: Data verification cycles are integrated into the mapping process in order to capture community feedback and verify the records in the geospatial data and their attribute values against the specification. The mapping includes a series of validation, cross-checking and verification cycles, run with the community -and in a few instances on-the-ground verification termed 'groundtruthing'.Step 7: Field validation. Field validation is carried out where the verification stages highlight gaps in information. Verification consists of targeted field visits to take GPS markers, or holding meetings with the local community to clarify particular issues.Participatory resource mapping in Dadacha Bassa (Caroline King Okumu).Facilitating the identification of features on the GIS platform in Oldonyiro village (Omar Jattani).To allow participation for community groups to inform planners.• To provide the necessary precision for planners to use local knowledge effectively.• To make a 'bridge' for information to flow between customary and formal institutions.• To better share ideas through communication tools using powerful visual language.• To demonstrate the depth of local knowledge about natural resources and with that, demonstrate the importance of these resources.• To identify gaps and risks in the system being mapped.• To compare one plan with another to see how complimentary/contradictory they are.Conditions enabling the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: Communities are awed by the technology that allows them to see their resources while seated in a single specific location. The approach doesn't conflict with any community social, cultural, religious norms and values.• Availability/ access to financial resources and services: A brief GIS training of four weeks can allow county government staff to develop, add and update the database.• Institutional setting: The approach helps in improving planning at community and government levels, and is accepted by all stakeholders.• Collaboration/ coordination of actors: The product of the participatory mapping process is beneficial to all actors and many are willing to engage in implementation of the approach.• Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): The approach helps in land use planning and supports regulations meant to improve land governance such as a customary natural resource management bill.• Policies: Many policies and laws (including the national constitution) support the mapping of resources to improve land use planning.• Land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement): The approach allows communities to develop their land use plans for resource utilisation, and digitize them -making the work of land governance easier. none passive external support interactive self-mobilizationResource Advocacy Programme (RAP) undertook discussions with the local community and also with the county and national government in shaping the idea for the approach. planning All stakeholders (community, RAP, ADA, IIED, Geodata and Governments) were engaged in the planning for the implementation of the Approach. implementationCommunity members and all stakeholders were involved in the implementation of the participatory mapping. monitoring/ evaluationThe county government and the actors (RAP, ADA and IIED) monitor the participatory mapping database and improves it.Participatory mapping of community resources has seven steps, which can be summarised under the main groupings of: consultations with the community where key features are identified and mapped on paper; digitization of community identified points by GIS specialists; processing of the data where community identified attributes are incorporated into the data; and feedback sessions for community validation and verification.Author: Ibrahim Jarso.Decisions were taken by land users alone (self-initiative) mainly land users, supported by SLM specialists all relevant actors, as part of a participatory approach mainly SLM specialists, following consultation with land users SLM specialists alone politicians/ leaders Decisions were made based on evaluation of well-documented SLM knowledge (evidence-based decision-making) research findings personal experience and opinions (undocumented)Comment: The process requires inputs from all the relevant stakeholders. The community provide local knowledge of the features, GIS specialists provide technical expertise and the other local stakeholders provide their knowledge and experience of working in the communities for many years. The approach was implemented with support from donors and county government. Although in theory, it could be possible for resource users to auto-finance the Approach, this has not ever happened previously, and many of the resource users are not wealthy. Support is available for devolved development planning and mapping, but as yet this has not been assigned to participatory resource mapping.• It is a promising new approach that builds on the legitimacy of local/indigenous knowledge, and enables the county government to fulfil its mandate of undertaking participatory planning with communities. • GIS technology helps in the acceptance of the approach by many land users. • The mobility of the technology can provide an opportunity for all community members to add features as they come up.• It is a user friendly approach accepted and recognized by Isiolo pastoralists for mapping their rangeland resources. • IIt provides an opportunity to map all investments of development partners in the county and avoid duplication of projects. • IIt is a powerful tool for communication and advocacy for community land rights.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• It requires time and commitment from community members and county officers. g Systematic use of media (e.g. radio, websites, etc.) to publicize the approach and its importance to the community. • It is difficult for illiterate community members to fully engage with the approach and make meaningful contributions. g Provide local translations and interpretation as well as producing good visual maps.• There is a need for continuous updating. g Engage local universities and students. • Observation of key features and resources are sometimes obscured by clouds and thus mapping precision is affected. g Ground truthing visits and observations need to be undertaken to improve precision. • Lack of legislation to support and enforce the use of the approach. g Formulate legislation to support enforcement.agreements and joint land use plan. In addition, a Livestock Keepers Association was established, including 53 founding members -but with most households from the three villages being associate members. A constitution was developed for the Association, which was officially registered on 11 September 2015.In January 2016 the Ministry of Lands approved and registered the village land boundary maps and deed plans for the three villages.The District Council has issued the village land certificates, and the next step is for Village Councils to begin issuing Certificates of Customary Rights of Occupancy (CCROs). The shared grazing area will require three group CCROs to be issued to the Livestock Keepers Association -one from each village -for the part of the grazing area that falls under its jurisdiction. Signboards and beacons marking the shared grazing area are being put in place.In November 2017 a fourth village joined OLENGAPA, expanding the shared grazing area to 30,000 ha. The villages are now working to develop a management plan to improve rangeland productivity.Rangeland resources mapping is an important step in the joint village land use planning process (Fiona Flintan).Mapping livestock routes contributed to an understanding of mobility patterns across regions and villages (Mohammed Said).To secure shared grazing areas and other rangeland resources for livestock keepers, and to improve their management.• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: History of collective tenure, management and sharing of rangeland resources as part of sustainable rangeland management practices.• Institutional setting: Strong local government/community institutions for leading process at local albeit their capacity may require building.• Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): Tanzania's legislation, if implemented well, provides an enabling environment for securing of community/village rights for both individuals and groups.• Policies: Tanzania possesses facilitating national land use policy for the joint village land use planning approach, together with guidelines.• Land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement): Decision-making has been decentralised to the lowest levels, giving local communities considerable power to decide on the uses of their village land.• Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: Good local knowledge of rangeland management based on historical practice. Communities understand need for better rangeland management.• Workload, availability of manpower: Well-structured local community bodies ready to provide manpower. Local government experts in place to support VLUP process.Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: Marginalisation of pastoralists from decision-making processes at local and higher levels.• Availability/ access to financial resources and services: Village land use planning process is costly due to the requirement to include government experts in the process in order to gather required data and to authorise plans. Lack of government priority to village land use planning, so poor allocation of government funds to the process.• Collaboration/ coordination of actors: Poor coordination of different actors supporting VLUP in the past due to previous weakness of National Land Use Planning Commission (NLUPC). However, this is now changing as NLUPC becomes stronger and takes up coordination role.• Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): Legislation allows village land to be transferred into public land if in the 'public' or 'national' interest -this facility confers insecurity on village land.• Policies: There are conflicting policies over land coming from different sectors including land generally, together with forests, wildlife and livestock. These cause confusion at the local level. Depending on power of actors one set of policies may be stronger than another -wildlife-related policy for example can have a lot of power because there are many strong and influential tourism and conservation bodies lobbying for stronger protection of land, with potentially negative impacts for communities who want to use that land for other purposes.• Land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement): The process of village land use planning is costly due to the requirement for having local government experts involved, and the need to follow often complex procedures and steps. Many communities and even local government do not have adequate technical skills and knowledge to complete the long process, as well as not having adequate funds. This has held up the VLUP applications. Further few VLUPs move from their production stage to implementation stage including enforcement of bylaws and, for example, land management.• Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: Lack of investment in rangeland management and the provision of technical support e.g. through government extension services. Lack of technical knowledge in rangeland rehabilitation and improving rangeland productivity at scale.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: Lack of local markets and coordinated operations for livestock production.• Workload, availability of manpower: Lack of knowledge, skills and capacity amongst local communities and government experts to complete JVLUP adequately, including such as resolving conflicts between different land users. Comment: The community requires support from local government to protect their village lands including grazing lands from outsiders wanting to settle on the land -this is a constant problem to be addressed (despite the securing of village boundaries etc.). The community also needs capacity building and resources to improve the productivity of the land including the grazing areas. If they get these supports then they can sustain what has been implemented.• Improved the security of access and use to village land including grazing. • Brought attention to the challenges faced by land users in the area in protecting and using their village land, and the need for more investment and support for this. • Pastoralists are now more central to decision-making processes than they were before.• Collaboration of different stakeholders in implementing the approach has supported a new way of working. • Capacity of different stakeholders has been built along the way through joint problem-solving and learning-by-doing. • The approach -with adaptation -has application in other contexts/countries and shows that even if a rangeland is split by administrative boundaries there is opportunity to work across those village boundaries in order to maintain the functionality of the rangeland and land use systems such as pastoralism that depend upon this.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• Despite village land being theoretically protected, in practice it can still be encroached upon. g Greater support provided from government to enforce protection of land. • Time-consuming process which became more expensive than anticipated resulting in some gaps in funding. g Process needs to be refined through practice, and adequate funds allocated from beginning.• The selection of villages for JVLUP needs more care to ensure that enabling conditions for JVLUP exist. g In future selection of villages for JVLUP a set of criteria should be used that enable more enabling conditions to exist. • Information has not been methodologically collected on social, environmental and economic impacts of the approach. g In future the impacts of the approach need to be fully monitored and evaluated. • The VLUP is an expensive process to follow. g National government needs to identify ways to reduce the cost of the VLUP so that more villages can undertake it. Government needs to allocate more funds to VLUP. The VLUP is an expensive process to follow. • Need for an enabling environment. g The policy and legislation in Tanzania enables this process -it is not the case in the majority of other African countries.The transhumance pastoral communities of Southern Angola traditionally held gatherings of chieftains and community leaders to discuss management of commonly held pastoral resources. However, the conflicts of the last century led to the breakdown in traditional governance and the majority of the traditional management systems were abandoned. The RETESA Project has supported their recovery as a way to reduce land degradation and improve local livelihoods.The Approach was developed and implemented through the RETESA Project 'Land rehabilitation and rangelands management in smallholder agropastoral production systems in south western Angola'. RETESA is a project owned and implemented by the Ministry of Environment of the Government of Angola with technical and methodological assistance from The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and financed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF).From an early stage, RETESA identified management itself as the most effective tool to improve pastoral livelihoods and to reduce land degradation over large areas of land. However, the management terms and concepts used in conventional western cultures were difficult to convey to the pastoral communities. Thus communication of the needs and methods of appropriate grazing management were not fully understood and this led to confusion. After struggling initially with these challenges, the project technicians responsible for rangeland improvement and rehabilitation began to investigate the traditional management systems that were in place before the armed conflicts occurred. It was found that they adapted to modern rangeland management theory and practice and had a rich vocabulary which described in detail the timing and movements of the herds. Rather than teach a new way of viewing the natural world, the project's objective became one of resurrecting these lost systems and recuperating what was, in the communities' words, 'the ways of our elders'. In order to provide an underlying methodological basis which guided the process, the 'Green Negotiated Territorial Development' (GreeNTD) methodology was introduced and used to negotiate the terms and agreements of the six management plans created and implemented during the process.In essence, the role of the traditional management systems was to keep the animals in more remote, mountainous areas during the rainy season, the only time of year when water is available in these areas, and gradually bring them back to the lowland, river plains during the dry season. This simple system allowed for rangeland recovery and rest -and for agriculture to be practiced in the lowlands during the rainy season without the threat of intrusion by livestock, something which has become a constant source of conflict within the communities. Often the owners are far from the land, and send their local managers to participate, though they have often have little decision-making capacity. However, their presence and opinion should be sought.Municipal and Communal Administrations and their representatives.Co-coordinate the organisation and logistics of the Jango Pastoril forums. Participate as a stakeholder in the meetings and give feedback and administrative approval of the decisions taken. The Municipal and Communal Administrations usually have the final word on any decisions made so they must actively participate in the meetings.Project 'RETESA', FAO Angola. FAO Angola was responsible for supporting the Angolan Government in its design and execution of the Global Environment Funded 'Project RETESA'.• Policies: Pastoral cultures are still seen by many in power as a threat to education and economic prosperity.• Land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement): There still remains much to be done in the area of land governance, from decision-making, implementation and especially enforcement.• Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: Very little is known about SLM, and technical support is lacking at community and municipal levels.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: The more traditional tribes rarely sell their animals to local markets, leading critics to claim that their way of life contributes little to the local or national economies.• Workload, availability of manpower: Manual labour is most often carried out by the women of the family, and those under 18 years are responsible for caring for the animals and following them on their daily search for pasture and water.Project 'RETESA', FAO Angola was the lead agency, though plans are for the Municipal Forums to be self-sufficient in 2018. none passive external support interactive self-mobilizationThe first meetings and forums were organised by the Municipal Administrations and the Retesa Project, picking up from previous attempts at organising discussion forums to manage commonly held natural resources. planning Once Jango Pastoril were well established, the decision-making process was transferred to them, with technical support being provided by the SLM specialists and with the Municipal Administrators having final word. implementationThe implementation of the decisions made was based on their type and complexity and often depended on input and action from various stakeholders. Where possible, external support in the form of technical knowledge, materials, food, machinery, etc. were organised to support the agreed upon activities and works. monitoring/ evaluation At the current stage, monitoring and evaluation is being carried out by the RETESA Project and the supporting Administrations.In the best case scenario, monitoring and evaluation would be carried out by the Jango Pastoril themselves, though external support would most likely be needed, at least until the process is well understood by the forum participants.As the initial processes had different entry points and acted at different administrative levels, a graphic representation of the process can be seen in the flow chart provided. Readers are asked to focus on the entry points and how each situation developed, rather than focus on the specific names of the areas.The Approach has overseen the creation of five Jango Pastoril, each with their own contexts and stakeholders, which are highlighted in the flow chart in green. By introducing and implementing the GreeNTD methodology, the five Jango Pastoril also debated and approved land management plans with administrative and community support, which in some cases allowed for the creation of large grazing reserves. The sixth and final plan is the combination of the 5 plans into an encompassing plan which serves a large part of the principal transhumance migration route.PROJECTO RETESA IMPACT ANALYSIS AND CONCLUDING STATEMENTS no yes, little yes, moderately yes greatlyIn most cases, there are no community forums or public spaces for locals to voice their opinions. By creating the Jango Pastoril forums, participant land users and their representatives were able to voice their concerns and propose solutions.Experience in the area has shown that presenting 'scientific evidence' to communities with little formal education can produce interesting interpretations and consequences. Most decisions in pastoral communities are based on past experience, social conventions and emotions. However there is significant collective memory that has allowed for the evidence of land degradation and climate change to become clear and better decisions are being made.Did the Approach help land users to implement and maintain SLM Technologies? Yes, the approach did help land users implement and improve upon current practices. However, the Jango Pastoril forums were not created as a purely educational environment and they depended on the participants having enough experience and knowledge to provide adequate feedback and make proper decisions.Coordination was improved at various public and administrative levels, though the forums as an institution are still in their early stage.Did the Approach mobilize/ improve access to financial resources for SLM implementation? Funding has been sought for water point improvement works yet none has materialised to date.As the first Jango Pastoril forums in each area did include 2 hours of education on proper rangeland and natural resource management, some knowledge and capacity building was part of the process.The exchange of points of view and communication between the different stakeholders improved the collective knowledge of traditional production systems and the challenges each group faces.The Jango Pastoril forums were the first organised events that brought these different stakeholders to the table to discuss key issues surrounding commonly held natural resources.The Jango Pastoril discussed and dealt with various sources of conflict in the local areas where they were held. In some cases, solutions were found and agreed upon; however, some conflicts were best left in the hands of the relevant authorities, though suggestions and proposals were gathered and presented to Administrative authorities present.Pastoral herders often enjoy a certain amount of standing within their communities, and the majority of the participants were elder male members of the communities. Women farmers and widows were often invited but were overall under-represented in the forums. This is clearly an area of improvement for future interventions.Although a number of women hold high positions within the Provincial and Municipal governments and took part in the forum discussions as administrative representatives, for the most part the participants in the forums were elderly men of standing.A small percentage of young males took part in the forums. As they mostly care for the livestock, it would be good to improve their participation rates in future events.Did the Approach improve issues of land tenure/ user rights that hindered implementation of SLM Technologies? Land rights and tenure were not addressed either by the forums or the Project. The land management plans created and implemented maintained the 'status quo' currently operating in the area.The land management plans should produce improved animal production rates and reduce livestock invasions of crops, leading to improved food security and nutrition.Did the Approach improve access to markets? Sales of livestock is still a sensitive issue in the area and this topic did not form part of the discussions.Water harvesting and access was a common topic and a list of priority areas and works was prepared and presented to Communal and Municipal Administrations, leading to a number of access and storage improvement activities.Did the Approach lead to more sustainable use/ sources of energy? Charcoal production and its effects on the area was raised and debated a number of times but no agreements or solutions were found.Did the Approach improve the capacity of the land users to adapt to climate changes/ extremes and mitigate climate related disasters?The creation of large-scale grazing reserves and institutions that allow for debate and adaptation of management to increasing changes should lead to an improved capacity to adapt to changes in the climate. Comment: Given coordination and willingness, the communities and Administrations have the resources needed to continue on with Approach as it has been, albeit without the technical and logistical support given by the project until this point. In any case, the process has shown to be well accepted.• Through the Jango Pastoril, land users now have available an instrument to voice opinions and bring attention to issues affecting pastoral communities and the natural resources they depend on. • It brings people in contact with decision-makers and others who play important roles in community affairs. • The Jango Pastoril also serve as a source of information, for example, information on water and pasture availability, on livestock theft, on the Administrations point of view on key issues and priorities, on new projects or programmes.• The Jango Pastoril brings together a diverse and important group of stakeholders who normally wouldn't meet with the objective of addressing rangeland management and livestock issues. In doing so, it brings attention to a number of serious problems affecting the base of local livelihoods and promotes understanding and collaboration between those present and the communities they represent. • It is one of the few ways to directly deal with the root cause of land degradation, which in this case is the cause is poor land management. It was management processes which drove the land degradation, and land management should equally be the tool used to address the problems. The land management plans created through the Jango Pastoril hopefully return things to a process by which the land was productive and supported a wide array of life. • It creates an institution whose formalities and objectives are easily understood and appropriated by locals. This institution deals with issues that are of a common concern and that should be receiving more attention than they are. • The Jango Pastoril and the commonly agreed land management plans they produced add weight to the argument for maintaining the commons for public use and grazing. By entering into agreements and producing management plans that improve local resources, the communities can show unity and argue against those that want to divide and privatise land in the area.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• It can require a lengthy trip and an overnight stay for participants who have to travel from isolated communities. g The Jangos were scheduled at the same time as other key events and meetings, so as to reduce costs and travel. The Municipal and Communal Administrations usually found accommodation for those that had to stay the night. • The issues discussed and decisions made will have outcomes that will affect some land users. Obviously, there are those that are benefiting from the current situation and they will try and ensure that things remain as they are. g The GreeNTD methodology discussed earlier has a well-established system for involving all stakeholders, assessing their motivations and publically producing a viable plan that addresses key issues. • The withdrawal of logistical and technical support by the RETESA Project will affect the Jango Pastoril forums. g Approach other projects coming into the area and find other funding opportunities to continue to support the growth of the forums.• The Jango Pastoril do little to improve the situation of the disadvantaged members of the population, or to improve gender equality. In other words, they perpetuate current cultural power bases. g Explore ways with the Jangos of bringing in more farmers and women into the discussions. Or create 'Jango Campones' which deal with cropping issues and land rights. • The Jango Pastoril do little to address land ownership issues or land rights. g t should be the Jango that ask for help on this issue, but the Jango Pastoril have proven to be in favour of the rangelands being open and available for community grazing. • Enforcement of laws and regulations is not always easy in such isolated territory. g Establish protocols and systems for dealing with offenders that are known to the local authorities and support all attempts to communicate the plans to land users and invite their feedback. This approach group covers the promotion of improved marketing to adapt the products and sales according to market information, through value chain development. The shift is towards (1) high-value (and origin-specific) labelled products (e.g. for 'naturally produced' grass-fed beef or game), (2) improved abattoirs and value of the meat, (3) promotion of non-livestock rangeland products (NLRP) (e.g. legally produce charcoal, firewood, grass for thatching, fruits, nuts (e.g. shea nut butter), gum arabic, medicinal plants, milk, and payment for ecosystem services (ESS). For rangelands, marketing of livestock is a major source of income. Livestock perform multiple functions in the African economy by providing food, inputs for crop production and soil fertility management, raw material for industry, cash income as well as promoting savings, being central to social functions, and providing employment opportunities.-Improve market infrastructure and access.-Improve marketing of livestock: healthy and high quality livestock; high-end products, branding and origin labelling. -Explore non-livestock rangeland products: medicines, cosmetics etc. -Establish functioning carbon credit and payment for ecosystem services (PES) schemes for rangelands.-Livestock to market programmes: where cattle markets are held in conservancies that have demonstrated efforts to rehabilitate rangelands and implement grass management. Cattle are bought directly from pastoralists on their doorstep, and priced per kilo to ensure fair prices.-Special high value beef/ grass-fed meat label rearing: guarantees customers high animal -welfare standards and good products 1 .-Livestock insurance: livestock market information and measurement of forage conditions made via satellite data on vegetation cover help track changes, support decisions and legitimise insurance programmes.-Improved abattoirs in terms of location and hygiene management: continual improvement is critical to ensure that the abattoirs remain relevant, efficient and effective over time.Value chain development: adding value to pastoral products -livestock and non-livestock products -e.g. by processing milk and dairy products, supplementary feeding, manure for fertility or fuel, firewood or processed into compressed firewood or pellets, deBushing-Value Addition 'I used to be an invader tree' (GIZ).charcoal production, use of medicinal, aromatic and cosmetic plants (devil's claw, shea/ karité, gum arabic, etc.), grass for thatching/ roof building and for weaving baskets, other handicrafts such as bead jewellery and wood carvings.Payment for ecosystem services (PES): provides incentives to land users to supply environmental services that benefit society (e.g. carbon sequestration, upstream/ downstream water availability and quality) 2 . Those who benefit pay those who provide the services.(Eco)tourism: promoted as environmentally sound and locally beneficial tourism. Its growth in Africa is exceptional because of landscape, wildlife diversity and abundance of charismatic wildlife species. Community-based initiatives have emerged from ecotourism with both ecological and socio-economic benefits to rural communities and nations.Reported from 'bounded without wildlife' and to a lesser extent from 'agropastoral' system. -When livestock is perceived as symbol of wealth, there is reluctance to sell.-Private sector, especially insurance companies are profit oriented and might not be fully motivated to venture into remote areas with higher risks. -Carbon benefit funding channels not sufficiently established.Pastoralism and livestock production and markets are of significant importance to the economies of many countries in SSA. Therefore, improving livestock value, markets and value chains are of high priority in all the rangelands. In addition, further marketing of non-livestock products and ecosystem services has a high applicability and potential for adoption. Factors that can affect adoption are available infrastructure, access to markets, proximity to specialized clientele (e.g. tourist lodges, along busy roads), arrangements with industries, continuous adaptation to market fluctuations and changes.This small dairy is a positive example of: (a) appropriate technologies for \"good\" camel milk production; (b) collecting, processing and preserving camel milk and dairy products to ensure safety and quality; and (c) develop standards to facilitate trade and export to the rest of the world.The mini dairy started up in 1989, when camels were used almost exclusively as a means of transport. In 2002, milk deliveries reached 20,000 litres a day, but a drought dealt a severe blow to the sector. Over the years, herders have found that the regular income from milk sales has improved their living standards and enabled them to feed their livestock in dry periods (Rota and Sperandini 2009).Tiviski camel-milk collection center in Mauritania (Courtesy Photo).In line with national development plans, which promote domestic value addition for local resources, the bush control programme strengthens the restoration of productive rangeland piloting various value chains, including modernised charcoal production, bush based animal feed and household cooking fuel. It triggers and drives large-scale bush thinning activities. The programme is implemented through a collaboration of public and private stakeholders. Coordination is ensured through a cross-sector steering committee, which includes the Ministries of National Planning (chair), Agriculture, Environment, Energy, and Industrialisation. https://qcat.wocat.net/en/summary/3396/ Charcoal production (GIZ).. KLIP is a GoK funded drought insurance program for vulnerable pastoralists located in the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASALs) of Kenya. KLIP's overall objective is to reduce the risk of livestock mortality emanating from drought. This is intended to help to build resilience of vulnerable pastoralists for enhanced and sustainable food security.Currently, under KLIP, GoK pays insurance premiums for a maximum of 5 Tropical Livestock Units to over 18,000 selected households that are considered vulnerable (i.e. own less than 5 TLUs). (0.1 of 1TLU is equivalent to 1 goat or sheep,therefore 10 goats/sheep = 1 cow (TLU) and 1.7 of TLU is equivalent to a camel or 17 goat/sheep or 1 cow + 7 goats/ sheep = 1 camel). The program is currently being implemented in 8 Arid and Semi-Arid counties in Northern Kenya. In case of severe forage scarcity because of drought, the households enrolled on KLIP receive pay-outs to enable them purchase fodder, veterinary drugs and water to keep their animals alive during the drought season. The expected impact of KLIP on pastoralists' livelihoods protected assets and improved resilience due to better recovery mechanisms from drought shocks. At national level, reduced expenditure on humanitarian emergencies during severe droughts and sustained contribution of the livestock sub sector to the national economy is expected. As a Sustainable Land Management (SLM) solution, the KLIP approach can contribute to reduced pressure on grazing lands by providing pay-outs which are used by pastoralists to purchase animal feeds from outside the KLIP counties during drought periods, leading to reduced land degradation.KLIP was first piloted in 2014 in 2 counties in the ASALs of Kenya i.e. Wajir and Turkana counties. 2,500 households from each county were enrolled to the program, each receiving insurance worth 5TLUs for 1-year renewable period. In August 2016, 275 households in Wajir County received a total of Ksh. 3.5 million pay-out as a result of the failed long rain season of the same year. KLIP later expanded to cover 4 more counties in 2017 which included Isiolo, Marsabit, Mandera and Turkana raising the total number of beneficiary households to 14,000. In February 2017, a payout worth Ksh. 214 million was triggered to 10,000 pastoralists households across the six counties at the end of the failed short rainy season of 2016 (October to December). In 2017 KLIP added to more Counties Samburu and Tana River on its scope. Later in August of the same year, another payout worth Ksh. 319 million triggered across 7 counties leading to 12,000 beneficiaries receiving compensation. Currently KLIP is operational in the 8 counties, with plans underway for expansion to reach all the 14 ASAL counties of Kenya. KLIP pay-outs are pegged to measurements of forage conditions made via satellite data on vegetation cover to derive an index of seasonal forage availability/scarcity, called the Normalized Differenced Vegetative Index (NDVI). The index can be defined as a measure comparing the total amount of forage available across the contract season with the his- toric average forage availability of that season. When the index signals that forage conditions have deteriorated to the point that animals are likely to die, KLIP compensates pastoralists in cash pay-outs immediately after a failed rainy season(s) and just before the start of subsequent dry season to help pastoralists buy fodder, drugs and water to sustain their livestock through the drought period.The use of a satellite based Index eliminates the need for insurance companies to carryout loss verification, which would be logistically and financially impossible to implement if they were to provide livestock insurance in such vast and remote areas as Kenya's ASALs. Satellite data (NDVI) is used to calculate forage conditions in a specific area over a specific season in order to determine whether the index could trigger a pay-out. Once pay-outs are triggered pastoralists registered under the affected areas are automatically eligible for compensation. Payouts are immediately disbursed via either M-Pesa or bank accounts depending on the beneficiaries preferred means as specified during registration.The implementation of KLIP is done through a Public Private Partnership approach (PPP) spearheaded by the State Department of Livestock (SDL) under the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MOALF). The GoK purchases KLIP policies on behalf of the pastoralists targeted under the KLIP program. However, in case of an insurance payout, indemnified households receive their respective share of the payout directly from the underwriting insurance company/ies. Private Insurance companies registered in Kenya provide underwriting services for KLIP. The World Bank Group provides financial and technical support while ILRI provides awareness and capacity development support together with KLIP contract design. Various capacity development and awareness creation tools e.g. radio programs, posters, flyers, cartoon booklets, videos and training manuals have been used by KLIP to target pastoralists, partners and policy makers. A contract design tool has also been developed for KLIP with the support of ILRI and the WBG for insurance firms to use in determining their KLIP pricing options.Ashok Shah (centre), CEO of APA insurance company presenting the National KLIP payout cheque for all the 6 counties under KLIP. He is flunked by representatives of various insurance companies from the KLIP risk underwriting consortium (ILRI).Cabinets Secretary for the Ministry of Livestock Agriculture and Fisheries, issuing cheques to beneficiaries in Wajir County in March 2017. Looking on is the Wajir County governor, Ahmed Abdullahi (ILRI).The overall objective of KLIP is to reduce the risk of livestock mortality emanating from drought and to build the resilience of vulnerable pastoralists for enhanced and sustainable food security. KLIP is intended to enhance the capacity of pastoral communities to minimize weather related risks through provision of index based livestock insurance. KLIP's specific objectives are: i) To build the resilience of vulnerable pastoralists in Kenya's ASALs against the consequences of drought by developing and applying index based insurance products in the provision of livestock insurance services to the pastoralists.ii) To build capacities of the pastoral communities and stakeholders in the use of insurance for the reduction of weather related risks and rebuilding of livelihood support systems.iii) To increase Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP) in the provision of index based livestock insurance to the vulnerable pastoralists whose livelihoods are dependent on livestock.Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: The belief that rainfall or drought are both God's fate upon man is common both as a traditional and religious belief among pastoralist communities. Most of them hold that human beings should not try to control/ mitigate against such. There is also the concern of whether insurance is 'halal' in the context of Islamic Shariah. Both of these challenges have been widely addressed in the implementation of KLIP, through awareness creation and sensitization efforts done in consultation and involvement of national and local religious leaders together with insurance companies and the local communities.• Availability/ access to financial resources and services: Bureaucratic processes involved in the steps towards policy formulation puts at risk the guarantee for continued funding from the government of Kenya, especially in case of regime change. Efforts are being made to influence and initiate policy formulation at the national level. The SDL has also approached county governments where KLIP is being implemented to encourage them to contribute towards the scheme, in order to cover their local communities.Conditions enabling the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: Apart from being the main source of livelihoods for many of the communities living in Kenya's ASALs, pastoralism is a cultural practice that has been passed on from generation to generation. Pastoralists aspire to protect their herds from all manner of perils, including drought related livestock losses.• Availability/ access to financial resources and services: Financial support for KLIP mainly from GoK and the World Bank Group. This has been a great enabling factor as huge financial investment is required for premium subsidies, awareness creation, operations etc.• Collaboration/ coordination of actors: KLIP has leveraged academic research, advocacy, private sector partnerships, NGOs and other stakeholders working to improve the livelihoods in the pastoralist rangelands of Kenya. It has managed to tap into emerging innovations and insights from past work done for instance by ILRI and her partners such as AUSAID, DFID, USAID, Cornell University, European Union in the implementation of Index Based Livestock Insurance (IBLI), managing to further draw on both the knowledge generated and lessons learned (see references below).• Policies: KLIP enjoys the goodwill of various partners including the Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA), county governments, the national treasury, National Parliament, the Presidency and other key stakeholders who are willing to support the program in policy formulation and advocacy to create an enabling environment for the scaling-up of KLIP and further commercialization of index insurance by private local insurance companies and other financial sector players. Financial/ material support provided to land users Over 14,000 households currently under KLIP receive fully subsidized livestock insurance cover where the government of Kenya fully funds the premiums at an average rate of Ksh. 3000 per TLU, based on the cost of feeding 1 TLU during the months affected with severe drought during in a year. Each pastoralist receives cover for a maximum of 5 cows (5 TLU). However the SDL plans to provide for a partially subsidized KLIP cover, which can be purchased by any interested pastoralist, for as long as they are willing to pay for a partial cost of the premium. Further considerations are underway to assess the possibility of making voluntary insurance more accessible and affordable to pastoralists by partial premium subsidies.partly financed fully financedThe government pays premiums on behalf of the pastoralists but is the policy holder. However, in-case a payout is triggered, the pastoralists receive the indemnity directly. Over time, the GoK plans to reduce the size of public support by transitioning into voluntary type of insurance.no yes, little yes, moderately yes greatlyDid the Approach empower local land users, improve stakeholder participation? KLIP has facilitated regular stakeholder interactions leveraging various partnerships forged within its PPP framework. Local communities, county governments, national government and NGOs are all engaged in the quest to find solutions for the pastoralists, who face repetitive cycles of devastating droughts.KLIP has largely enabled evidence-based decision making within the National treasury and Parliament as both entities have been considerably increasing annual financial allocations for KLIP. Other donors e.g. the World Bank continue to support KLIP implementation as well as there being increased interest from county governments to provide additional funding towards the program. Also more pastoralists are beginning to voluntarily purchase livestock insurance as they have experienced ho the product works through KLIP.The impact of KLIP on the target population with regards to land use and maintenance of SLM technologies is not yet observable as KLIP is only 3 years into implementation. Rigorous impact analysis may need to be conducted to establish such impacts. However, the rising demand for the KLIP product both from the insurance companies (supply side) and the pastoralists (demand side) is an indication of implementation and maintenance of the SLM (KLIP).Did the Approach mobilize/ improve access to financial resources for SLM implementation? Advocacy efforts have been directed at raising decision makers' awareness on the benefits of KLIP is having and the potential it holds for pastoralist communities country-wide. County governments and donors need to appreciate and be motivated towards playing a key role in the implementation KLIP.Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of land users to implement SLM? Insurance as a concept is complex and regulated entities in the sector seldom commit resources for awareness creation other than marketing of their individual products. KLIP implementation takes into account this situation and has continuously undertaken publicity and awareness creation about insurance with the aim of ensuring that consumers know about and understand the concept of insurance, and can make informed judgments and to take effective decisions in an insurance transaction. Did the Approach empower socially and economically disadvantaged groups? ILRI conducted a phone survey in 2017, where 643 phone numbers registered to beneficiaries under the KLIP program were selected out of the total 14,000 beneficiaries. Out of the 643, 337 beneficiaries were reached and out of these 300 were surveyed (37 either had no time or did not consent). Questions were asked about the Short Rain Short Dry 2016 and Long Rain Long Dry 2017 seasons. Of the 300 surveyed, 129 reported receiving KLIP payments associated with the SRSD 2016 drought. Out of these 58% indicated having spent the money on food. Based on this therefore, it can be noted that KLIP has moderately contributed to social and economic empowerment of disadvantaged groups.Did the Approach lead to improved food security/ improved nutrition? Under the same study described above, out of 300 beneficiaries surveyed, 129 reported receiving KLIP payments associated with the SRSD 2016 drought, 75 (58%) of these, reported having spent the cash on food stuff for their households. The KLIP study above also indicated increased access to markets as respondents were asked how they changed their response to the drought once they knew that the KLIP payouts were coming. Out of the 63 respondents to this question, more than 50% indicated that they increased purchase of, veterinary drugs & services together with forage and water for their animals.Did the Approach improve the capacity of the land users to adapt to climate changes/ extremes and mitigate climate related disasters? KLIP has so far been able to enhance the capacity of pastoral communities to minimize weather related risks through provision of index based livestock insurance build the resilience of vulnerable pastoralists in Kenya's ASALs. Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• Full commercialization of livestock insurance might be a challenge to achieve considering that the private sector, especially insurance companies are profit oriented and might not be fully motivated to venture into the hard to reach, remote and poorly infrastructured ASALs of Kenya where KLIP is implemented. g Continuous capacity development and proper policy environment should be created to enable the private sector's desire to venture into the target regions and fully commercialize the product. • Sustainability -There is no government policy or legislative Act on KLIP. Its therefore not a guaranteed possibility that the government will support this in the long term. g Continued advocacy, lobbying and sensitization need to be done targeting the key policy makers. Also a proper exit strategy should be designed and put into action. Mara Beef provides a new direct to market sales approach for pastoralist's in Kenya, in an effort to make livestock production more viable to local landowners. This livestock production model is combined with rangeland management and training in an effort to improve pastoral livlihoods, restore rangelands and prevent degradation, and support biodiversity conservation.Mara Beef is a limited company that raises top quality beef on the edge of the Maasai Mara, Kenya. The Mara Beef company uses their own private land -Naretoi farm -as well as partnering with the Enonkishu Conservancy, to introduce high quality beef breeds to local herds, and sell the beef onto high end supermarkets and restaurants through their own abattoir. There is a large gap in the prime beef market in Kenya, and Mara Beef is trying to fill this gap. Other cuts, not prime cuts, are sold to other less expensive restaurants.The beef is slaughtered and butchered on site. Mara Beef is engaged in many facets of improved rangeland management; the management of Enonkishu Conservancy and Naretoi farms; through the Mara Training Centre, a training hub for rangeland management; and using the Mara Beef network to link pastoral communities with higher value market.The Enokishu Conservancy is a conservancy created on the edge of the Maasai Mara ecosystem, and is registered under the Maasai Mara Wildlife Conservancies association. The conservancy is 6,000 acres in size, and is owned by 34 landowners who are Maasai pastoralists. Mara Beef has worked with the conservancy to develop a grazing plan for the conservancy. This plan encourages seasonal rotational grazing that allows grasslands to be heavily grazed for short periods, and allowed to recover over long periods. Conflict between predators and cattle is minimised through the use of mobile bomas (enclosures), to protect cattle at night. Integrating wildlife and livestock management into this conservancy aims to i) provide financial benefits through livestock sales from community cattle to build resilience to stochastic events, such as droughts; ii) to increase food security through supplementary income generation; iii) establish sustainable livestock production, to reduce rangeland degradation in an effort to restore and protect ecosystem functioning. This includes the improvement of soils, watershed protection, carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation. The conservancy pays each land owner to use the land for cattle fattening, and the average land rent paid to each landowner per year is $20 per acre, spending roughly $119,680 per year. Community members also receive conservancy fees from tourists visiting the area. Finally Mara Beef also provides market linkages for the broader pastoral community to premium beef markets. This service lets pastoral communities from across the region to sell beef at a guaranteed price based on both weight and grade at the animals. This price is often significantly higher, on average around $50, than any price offered by local markets, and the lower transport costs and less weight loss on transport also benefit the seller. The emphasis on high quality beef, with high weight requirements, should have a broader affect on pastoral communities, encouraging improved rangeland management for improved livestock productivity. Although this process will be slow. Mara Beef, for example, was granted a loan from the Agricultural Finance Corporation in January 2017 to purchase malnourished cattle during the drought -where Mara Beef bought 1,000 animals from 105 individuals at an average of $250 per cow.Enonkishu conservancy (Lippa Wood (2017). Mara Training Centre;(Lippa Wood (2017).• Establish sustainable livestock production and premium market for pastoralists.• Improve grazing management systems through implementation and training.• Conserve and restore biodiversity through an integrate wildlife-livestock approach.Conditions enabling the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: Cultural and traditional ecological knowledge complements the teaching of the Mara Training Centre and the holistic management of Enonkishu conservancy.• Availability/ access to financial resources and services: Provision of a grant (and loan) through the African Enterprise Challenge Fund allowed for the improvement of the slaughter house; livestock purchases from community members; the establishment of Enonkishu conservation area; and the building of the Mara Training Centre Support has also been provided by WWF to help establish the conservation area.• Institutional setting: Enonkishu is a community onwned conservancy which operates as a legal entity and acts as the interaction point between Mara Beef and the local community.• Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): Enonkishu conservancy has formed under the provisions of the Wildlife Act 2013 to form a conservancy, bringing together private landowners.• Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: The creation of the Mara Training Centre acts as a hub of knowledge for information sharing and technical support in rangeland management, offering courses and extension services to communities. This is supported by the Kenya Wildlife Conservancies Association and the Savory Institute.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: The creation of the Mara Beef premium market ensures that pastoralists receive improved prices on their livestock compared to normal markets. The farm manager has a long history of working with rangeland management. They consulted with specialists from the region to help advise on the best way to manage grazing on Enonkishu, as well as including community dialogue on best practice. Mara Beef was set up with advise from business experts to build a sustainable and profitable beef business. The Mara Training Centre was developed in consultation with landowners and with experts from the fields of conservation and rangeland management.• Provision of knowledge on improved livestock production and rangeland management. • Provision of an improved market for cattle.• Creation of a production oriented approach provides the potential for improved rangeland management across the region.With pastoralists beginning to produce fewer, higher quality cattle for sale, through efforts to improve grazing management across the region. • This approach has a huge potential to be up-scaled to support community conservation through a sustainable and well managed livestock production and rangeland management model. • Mara Beef has also been a key catalyst of conversation across SSA relating to sustainable rangeland management, livestock production, and mixed livestock-wildlife ecosytems.Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks g how to overcome• Lack of ability to practice individual herding within the conservation area. g Use of tradtional Maasai community structures to enforce grazing rules.• The focus on cattle present a great opportunity, but sheep and goats also need a better, readily available market to increase off-take. g Building of a pack-house in Nairobi for goat meat for the export market, to compete with other markets. • Lack of impact on improved rangeland management beyond the Enonkishu area, especially when livestock is purchased from all over the country. There is also a lack of high quality cattle. g Establish links with other conservancies and landowner groups to encourage improved grazing management, producing higher quality cows. The model works to first buy cattle from NRT affiliated conservancies, these cattle are sold on weight and grade, and tries to embrace a more market-driven approach. Once bough cattle is quarantined and vaccinated on Lewa. They are then fattened and sold on to different markets depending on size and age.The program aims to benefit local people through providing an equitable market with similar or better rates than available and through revenue generation for each conservancy -to provide health and education benefit. A key goal of this benefit system is through channelling conservancy levies and behavioural change into improved rangeland management. Improved management, implemented by conservancies, will lead to improved productivity of the rangelands, increased livestock quality, increased revenue for pastoralists, and ultimately contribute to the goals of NRT -Peace and security; resilient livelihoods; productive rangelands; stable wildlife; and growing enterprise.NRT has a fully fledged grazing management team working across the conservancies to enhance pasture and land management is upheld by all members, this working by involving alienation of dry season and wet season grazing corridors in order to guarantee animal -wildlife sustainable grazing. Several technologies are implemented under this approach to improve rangeland management. Strategic destocking and cattle bunching in conservancies is one method. Supplementary feed is also provided to increase the weight gain of cattle before sale. Kalama Community Wildlife Conservancy has been established with a hierarchical structure led by a board of 13 members (5 female, 8 male), one representing each of the 13 'zones' of the Conservancy. There are also three subcommittees for grazing, finances and tourism. The main aims are to improve the involvement of the community members in the overall management of the conservancy, the generation of additional income from high end tourism and wildlife conservation and the investment into improved land management. The main sources of funding are revenue from contracted high end tourism operation and donations (facilitated by Northern Rangelands Trust). The approximate breakdown of the funding sources is: Tourism including selling of handicrafts (60%), Donors (25%), County Government (5%), Livestock Trading (5%), Camping (5%). Improved livelihood and ownership in the management as well as shared responsibility and benefits are key incentives for the community members.Within the conservancy an attractive site on a hill overlooking the plains has been leased to an investor for the establishment of an exclusive tourist lodge on the principle of 'invest, operate and transfer', where the investor builds the infrastructure operates is for an agreed period and then transfers it to the community. Further several comping grounds are available for lower budget tourists. The conservancy profits from the neighbouring Samburu Game Reserves. This provides regular income from the lease of the land the entrance fees into the conservancy, employment opportunities for conservancy members (for catering, kitchen, house cleaning, rangers providing security for tourists and protection for wildlife as well as guides for safaris and for entertainment) and a market for selling handicrafts and souvenirs. Another cornerstone is their relationships with two trusts (Northern Rangeland Trust and the Grevy's Zebra Trust). They have been supportive in the implementation of several holistic rangeland management practices, which include 'bunched grazing' (livestock concentrated for short duration intensive grazing), short-term 'bomas' (livestock corrals occupied for ~7 days), clearing invasive species and reseeding with grass to assist land rehabilitation/restoration. The main aims are to maintain and/or improve rangeland productivity. Regarding methods, 'bunched grazing' is implemented by a team of herders ensuring the livestock are in a tight herd. Short-term 'bomas' are established on bare ground in the traditional manor (i.e. laying cut thorny Making agreements for the use and sharing of income from tourism.Northern Rangeland Trust: Grevy's Zebra Trust.Joint planning of land management across the boundaries of the Community Wildlife Conservancy. Agreement for movement across boundaries and sharing of common resources.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: Limited direct access to markets further afield (e.g. Nairobi or international markets), with better prices.• Workload, availability of manpower: Large areas of land awaiting rehabilitation, which would require large amounts of labour.Kalama Wildlife Community Conservancy.• Land previously considered unproductive is now considered grazing land. • Increased infiltration, reduced run-off and soil erosion.• Regeneration of the grassland in the 'core conservation area' (a central area with minimised grazing pressure demarcated for tourism) attracts wildlife, which in turn benefits tourism.• Where implemented, restoration activities and reduced grazing pressure have increased productivity and diversity or grasses and forbs for livestock and wildlife forage. • Takes advantage of inherent capacity of the land to recover. • Improved attractiveness for tourism.Land user's view • The expectation from the community regarding the tourismrelated jobs and income are too high. g Raising awareness about the limitations of benefits from tourism. • Increased pressure on 'Core Area' due to higher grass/ forage production. g Strictly enforce local by-laws that restrict grazing in the 'Core Area'. • Rangers under-equipped and lack sufficient capacity. g Source more equipment and provide training/capacity building for rangers.• Very few land users are implementing the practices (e.g. shortterm 'bomas' and 'bunched grazing'). g Although likely unfeasible, one possible solution might be for the community to manage the livestock communally and share the produce rather than individual ownership, which creates conflicts in motivation between the individual and the wider community. • Paying community members to undertake restoration activities has limited the area rehabilitated to date and led to a reliance on donor funding for land restoration. This may also be eroding the community's social capital by placing a monetary value on land health and thus devaluing it and replacing the inherent sense of value of land health that may have existed previously. g Encouraging voluntary participation in restoration activities may not only increase the area rehabilitated but also improve long-term maintenance through cultivating a sense of ownership. • Lack of adherence to and enforcement of grazing rules limits the success of sustainable land management efforts. g Strictly enforce local grazing rules and by-laws.Did the Approach improve the capacity of the land users to adapt to climate changes/ extremes and mitigate climate related disasters? Over such a short period, this is difficult to make any statements about.The conservancy structure creates jobs such as: managerial, committee membership, accounting, security, temporary labour. Comment: Lack of funding prevents larger areas from being rehabilitated through clearing of invasive species and reseeding with grass. Moreover, inability to control grazing pressure to give adequate rest to rehabilitating areas has led to unsuccessful restoration efforts. However, restoration efforts may gradually become voluntary in the future and land users may be insentience to adhere to local grazing rules.Comment: Initial costs for the establishment of the practices (e.g. cutting of invasive species are fully covered through income and resources from tourism and support from the trusts aesthetic improvement attractive landscape less degraded and monotonous due to one invasive species. The NamibRand Nature Reserve is a not-for-profit organisation in south-western Namibia. It was founded in 1984 through the initiative of one farm owner, Albi Brueckner, who agreed, with 16 neighbouring farmers, to jointly manage their 215,000 ha for nature conservation and tourism. Its aims are:• To conserve biodiversity for the benefit of future generations and protect the sensitive and fragile environment.• To create a nature reserve with a healthy and functioning ecosystem, providing a sanctuary for flora and fauna, and to facilitate seasonal migratory routes in partnership with neighbours.• To promote sustainable utilisation -through ecologically sustainable and high-quality tourism and other projects.• To achieve a commercially viable operation to ensure continuity and financial independence.The NamibRand Nature Reserve's contributions to biodiversity conservation, in accordance with the environmental management plan, include the following:• Removal of over 2,000 km of fencing to reinstate wildlife migration routes.• Re-introduction of giraffe and cheetah.• Bolstering numbers of red hartebeest and plains zebra.• Removal of alien invasive vegetation such as Prosopis species and replacing these with indigenous Acacias.• Zonation according to land use areas, including the setting aside 15% of the reserve as a wilderness area.• Limiting overnight visitors to an average of one bed per 1,000 ha, and 25 beds per location.• Conducting annual game counts, with results posted on the website www.namibrand.org Comment: The first property was purchased in 1984. The reserve was registered as a Game Reserve in 1992 and registered as the NamibRand Nature Reserve, an Association Not for Gain, in 2002.The approach aims, through participatory land use planning, to restore ecosystem function in the reserve and its surroundings to support high-quality, low-impact tourism that provides the means to support environmental education and other conservation projects.The overall Strategic Vision of the NamibRand Nature Reserve is to manage the Pro-Namib area, alongside the Namib Desert, for the enhanced conservation of the landscape and its biodiversity.School pupils on an environmental education tour (Samuel Fernadez-Diekert).Participants of a vulture awareness workshop (Lee Tindall).• Hosting researchers to study game migration routes. Results of wildlife monitoring, through the use of GPS collars are at: http://www. landscapesnamibia.org/sossusvlei-namib/research• Hosting the Namib Desert Environmental Education Trust (NaDEET), to empower and educate schoolchildren for a sustainable future.It operates an environmental education and sustainable living centre (www.nadeet.org).• A lighting management plan to qualify as an international dark sky reserve that avoids negative consequences of light pollution on biodiversity -which can interfere with animal navigation, reduce the hunting success of predators and prevent moths from pollinating (http://www.darksky.org/idsp/reserves/namibrand)• A water management plan, including monitoring of the impact of a water hole on the surrounding vegetation.• Implementation of tourism and land use zonation plans.• Capture and sale of live game for wildlife population management purposes.• Plans to develop a horticultural project to grow indigenous medicinal plants for commercial production, creating local jobs and income for conservation.Rangeland management is achieved largely through continual monitoring and control of animal populations, and the balance between functional groups of their species, and turning off the water supply where grasses are in need of rest. Local outreach efforts focus mainly on predator-livestock management on neighbouring farms.Stakeholders comprise the land owners, who agree on joint management, and the tourism concessionaires who operate in the reserve under contract. The reserve employs 12 people who are responsible for day-to-day management and maintenance. Biodiversity and land management are funded from park fees collected by the concessionaires from tourists who stay at their establishments. This small management team is possible, because tourism concessionaires offer scenic game drives across the reserve, while on the lookout for required action. For example, guides report issues such as leaking water pipes, unusual wildlife sightings, injured animals, and trespassers (etc.) to reserve managers, who can then react.Land owners who have connected their land to the reserve and are members of the NamibRand Nature Reserve Association have the option of serving as directors of the association, with joint decision making powers. Those who choose not can still contribute to the strategic mission of the reserve at annual general meetings.• Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: The area was historically visited by migrant San people and more recently by Nama people, who have settled permanently elsewhere. Since no people were living permanently in this hyper-arid ecosystem, the use of the area exclusively for nature conservation remains uncontested.• Availability/ access to financial resources and services: The establishment of the reserve was initially possible through the ample financial resources of wealthy, altruistic and philanthropic investors.• Institutional setting: Progressive government company laws, such as the possibility to register a Section 21 company ('Association Not for Gain') allow financial resources to be re-invested in conservation so as to further the objectives of the non-profit association. Section 21 companies also do not have to pay company taxes to the government.• Collaboration/ coordination of actors: Articles of Association and the management plan allow for the creation of a management team that effectively coordinates all activities on the reserve.• Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): Rights and therefore the possibility to benefit from wildlife are enshrined in the Nature Conservation Ordinance of 1975.Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach• Availability/ access to financial resources and services: The properties that make up the NamibRand Nature Reserve are located in a hyper-arid ecosystem. Farmers who attempted livestock farming there in the past almost all failed to establish economically viable farms, and most of them overextended themselves financially, resulting in the foreclosure of their farms. For this reason, the area became known as the 'Bankruptcy Belt'. Banks were, in the past, extremely reluctant to extend loans to landowners in this area, due to the low value and low agricultural potential. In recent years, the successes of conservation and tourism have changed this situation and banks are now prepared to accept farms with such land use as collateral for extending loans.• Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): The current Nature Conservation Ordinance of 1975 does not allow for the registration of private nature reserves. The status of the land with the government thus remains as agricultural land, and law enforcement has to rely on common law such as trespassing on private property.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: The remoteness of the reserve, 150km from the nearest town, results in expensive transport charges for goods and inflated prices for professional services.• Policies: Progressive, enabling policies of the Ministry of Environment and Tourism, such as the tourism policy and the parks and neighbours policy ensure meaningful collaborations between the public and the private sector. See http://www.met.gov.na• Land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement): Good governance is achieved through the adoption of Articles of Association and management plans. These guide decision-making and enable implementation. A set of rules, called the Vade Mecum, enable enforcement.• Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: Good networking, membership to various professional bodies and collaboration with universities and researchers ensure good knowledge about sustainable land management and technical support.• Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: A well-established tourism market to Namibia ensures a steady stream of visitors to the NamibRand Nature Reserve, enabling the collection of park fees and thus ensuring income for the reserve.• Workload, availability of manpower: Guides from tourism concessions on the reserve allow for sharing of workloads. Availability of human resources in the region is ample. Training was provided to the following stakeholders land users field staff/ advisers tourism concessionairesBiodiversity conservation, financial management, tourism best practices, principles of co-management, human-wildlife conflict resolution, rehabilitation.on-the-job farmer-to-farmer demonstration areas public meetings courses exchange visitsEwaso Ng'iro river -source of water in dry rangelands, Kenya (Hanspeter Liniger).Annex GlossaryThis glossary covers the most important technical terms used in this publication. Where there are no references cited for the entries, these are working definitions as employed by the authors -in the context of the book. It must be pointed out that some terms -such as 'rangelands' itself have multiple definitions in the literature. For some entries we give alternative definitions. Bold terms in a definition are defined in the glossary.For a more comprehensive glossary on rangeland related terms the reader is referred to the glossary list of 'Global Rangelands' 1 , the glossary chapter (Appendix 4) of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA 2005b), and 'an international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals (Allen et al. 2011).Adaptation: Adjustment in natural or human systems to a new or changing environment (MEA 2005).Agrobiodiversity: The variety and variability of animals, plants and micro-organisms that are used directly or indirectly for food and agriculture, including crops, livestock, forestry and fisheries 2 .Agro-ecological zones: Geographic regions having similar climate and soils for agriculture (FAO 1978).Agropastoralism: Systems that, in addition to pastoral livestock production, involve some form of crop cultivation (Allen et al. 2011).Agropastoralists: People who practice agropastoralism.The variability among living organisms from all sources including, inter alia, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of habitats (based on Convention on Biological Diversity) 3 .Biome: A major portion of the living environment of a particular region (such as a fir forest or grassland), characterized by its distinctive vegetation and maintained largely by local climatic conditions 4 .Browsing: Feeding of herbivores on leaves, soft shoots/ woody twigs, or fruits of high-growing, generally woody, plants such as shrubs and trees.Capacity building: A process of strengthening or developing human resources and skills, institutions, organizations, or networks (e.g. through training, etc.). Also referred to as capacity development or capacity enhancement (MEA 2005).Carrying capacity: The maximum stocking rate that will achieve a target level of animal performance, in a specified grazing system and that can be applied over a defined time without deterioration of the grazing land (Allen et al. 2011).The process of adjustment to actual or expected climate and its effects. In human systems, adaptation seeks to moderate or avoid harm or exploit beneficial opportunities. In some natural systems, human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate and its effects (IPCC 2014).Climate change mitigation (CCM): Efforts to reduce or prevent emission of greenhouse gases. Mitigation can mean using new technologies and renewable energies, making older equipment more energy efficient, or changing to more sustainable management practices or consumer behaviour 5 .The capacity of social, economic, and environmental systems to cope with a hazardous event or trend or disturbance, responding or reorganizing in ways that maintain their essential function, identity, and structure, while also maintaining the capacity for adaptation, learning, and transformation.(IPCC 2014, building on the definition used in Arctic Council 2013)Common property resource: A good or service shared by a welldefined community (MEA 2005).Conservation: The protection, care, management and maintenance of ecosystems, habitats, wildlife species and populations, within or outside of their natural environments, in order to safeguard the natural conditions for their long-term permanence 6 .Conservancy: Land set aside by an individual landowner, body corporate, group of owners or a community for purposes of wildlife conservation 7 .Cropland: Land devoted to the production of cultivated crops. May be used to produce forage crops (Allen et al. 2011).Decision maker: A person whose decisions, and the actions that follow from them, can influence a condition, process, or issue under consideration (MEA 2005).Degradation of land: Reduction or loss of biological or economic productivity of the land (see Box 2.3) 8 .Desertification: Land degradation in drylands resulting from various factors, including climatic variations and human activities (see Box 2.3) 9 (based on MEA 2005).Desert: Land on which vegetation is sparse or absent and is characterized by an arid climate. Deserts may be classified as hot or cold deserts depending on latitude and elevation (Allen et al. 2011).Dry forests: A type of forest characterized by relatively sparse distributions of pine, juniper, oak, olive, acacia, mesquite, and other drought-resistant species growing in scrub woodland, savanna, or chaparral settings, occurs in the southwestern United States, Mediterranean region, sub-Saharan Africa, and semiarid regions of Mexico, India, and Central and South America. 10 Drylands: Ecosystems characterized by a lack of water. They include cultivated lands, scrublands, shrublands, grasslands, savannahs, semi-deserts and true deserts. The lack of water constrains the production of crops, forage, wood, and other ecosystem services. Four dryland subtypes are widely recognized: dry sub-humid, semiarid, arid, and hyperarid, showing an increasing level of aridity or moisture deficit 11 .Ecosystem functions: An intrinsic characteristic of an ecosystem related to the set of conditions and processes through which an ecosystem maintains its integrity. They include such processes as water cycling, nutrient cycling, production, decomposition, and fluxes of energy (MEA 2005).Ecosystem services: The benefits people obtain from ecosystems. These services are categorized into (a) provisioning services such as food and water, (b) regulating services such as flood and disease control, (c) cultural services such as spiritual, recreational, and cultural benefits, and (d) supporting services, such as nutrient cycling, that maintain the conditions of life on Earth (MEA 2005 andLiniger et al. 2017).Ecological gradient: A gradation from one ecosystem to another when there is no sharp boundary between the two. 12.Nomadism: Nomads are members of a group of people who have no fixed home and move according to the seasons from place to place in search of food, water, and grazing land 20 . Their movements are opportunistic following pasture and water resources in a pattern that varies from year to year according to the availability of resources (Liniger et al. 2011).Non-livestock rangeland products: Products from the rangelands that are not livestock related. Sometimes wildlife and tourism (and even carbon credits) are included in this category, but it is normally used to describe medicinal plants, plants yielding products of commercial value such as honey, gum arabic (from Acacia senegal), shea butter, handicrafts, etc.Off-site: Downstream: away from fields or principal area of activity; concerns adjacent areas or areas further away from the area where specific activities are applied. Used to demonstrate that activities in one area also have impacts outside the area (e.g. downstream flooding) 21 .On-site: Refers to the area in which a land management practice is applied, the location itself 22 .Opportunism: Conscious policy and practice of taking advantage of circumstances -with little regard for principles or with what the consequences are for others. Or: the art, policy, or practice of taking advantage of opportunities or circumstances often with little regard for principles or consequences 23 .Pastoral system: A livestock production system found in rangeland areas where livestock grazing is the predominant form of land use (FAO, 2002).Pastoralism: A livelihood system based on open, yet managed, grazing of animals on natural or semi-natural grassland, grassland with trees, and/or open woodlands. Animal owners may or may not have a permanent residence while livestock are moved to distant grazing areas, according to the availability of resources (Jenet et al. 2016).Pastoralists: People who practice pastoralism Pasture: Land used permanently (five years or more) to grow herbaceous forage crops, either cultivated or growing wild (wild prairie or grazing land) for harvest by grazing, cutting, or both 24 (Allen et al. 2011).Productivity: The rate at which goods are produced or work is completed 25 . In the context of this book: mostly related to land productivity as the rate of biomass and the quality produced.Ranch: Commercial raising of grazing animals, mainly for meat but also milk and other products under extensive production systems usually with controlled boundaries and paddocks 26 .Rangelands: ecosystems that are dominated by grasses, grass-like plants, combined with various degrees of bush and tree cover that are predominantly grazed or browsed, and which are used as a natural and semi-natural ecosystem for the production of livestock and safeguarding of wildlife and additional ecosystem services (Blench and Sommer 1999, Allen et al. 2011and McGahey et al. 2014).Rangeland condition: Range condition is the present state of health of the range in relation to what it could be with a given set of environmental and managerial factor 27 .Rangeland degradation: Reduction in the capacity of the rangeland to provide ecosystem goods and services, over a period of time, for its beneficiaries (Bunning et al. 2011). Land degradation includes: soil erosion by water and wind, chemical and physical soil deterioration, and biological and water degradation (WOCAT 2018).The state of the rangeland -reflecting the degree of rangeland degradation and the ecosystem functions and services rendered.Equilibrium/ non-equilibrium: Equilibrium grazing systems and strategies are characterised by climatic stability that results in predictable primary production allowing optimal stocking rates because livestock reproduce and produce at a rate determined by the availability of feed, which is an inverse function of stock density. Non-equilibrium grazing systems and strategies are suited to situations where low and erratic rainfall produces unpredictable fluctuations in forage supplies and hence setting stocking rates is of little value because fluctuation in rainfall has a stronger effect than animal numbers on the abundance of forage (Behnke 2000).Governance: The process of regulating human behaviour in accordance with shared objectives. The term includes both governmental and non-governmental mechanisms (MEA 2005).Grassland: Land where grass or grass-like vegetation grows and is the dominant form of plant life 13 .Grazable forestland: Forestland that produces, at least periodically, understorey vegetation that can be grazed. Trees and shrubs can be browsed. (Allen et al. 2010).Grazing: Feeding of herbivores on herbaceous forage (grass or forbs).Group ranch: A livestock production system or enterprise where a group of people jointly own freehold title to land, maintain agreed stocking levels and herd their livestock collectively which they own individually. Selection of members to a particular group ranch was based on kinship and traditional land rights 14 .Forage/ forage crops: Edible parts of plants, other than separated grain, that can provide feed for grazing animals or that can be harvested for feeding. (Allen et al. 2011).Functional heterogeneity: Spatial and temporal variation in the grass height (structure), productivity, phenology, composition and chemical attributes of grassland and savannah plant communities, which determine the abundance, stability, diversity and spatial distribution of large mammalian herbivores 15 .Heterogeneity: Associated with variable patterns and processes that are dynamic in space and time and lead to complexity that is an essential characteristic of rangelands (Fuhlendorf et al. 2017).Holistic management: \"Manage the relationships between land, grazing animals and water in ways that mimic nature\" 16 .Intrinsic value: The value of someone or something in and for itself, irrespective of its utility for someone else 17 . Hence, every species has a value and role in nature. It has a right to exist, whether or not it is known to be useful to humans.Landscape: An area of land that contains a mosaic of ecosystems, including human-dominated ecosystems (MEA 2005).Land use: Human activities, which are directly related to the land, making use of its resources, or having an impact upon it (WOCAT 2018).Livelihood: Comprises the capabilities, assets (human, social, natural, physical, financial, and political capitals) and activities required for a means of living: a livelihood is sustainable which can cope with and recover from stress and shocks, maintain or enhance its capabilities and assets, and provide sustainable livelihood opportunities for the next generation 18 (based on Chambers and Conway 1992).Natural grassland: Natural ecosystem dominated by indigenous or naturally occurring grasses and other herbaceous species used mainly for grazing by livestock and wildlife (Allen et al. 2011).Natural resources: Resources produced by nature, commonly subdivided into non-renewable resources, such as minerals and fossil fuels, and renewable natural resources that propagate or sustain life and are naturally self-renewing when properly managed, including plants and animals, as well as soil and water 19 . This approach, traditional in nature, consists of a Geographical Information System, which integrates the water resources, the movement of populations, and the spatial distribution of grazing land, also in terms of the quantities of forage resources. The aim of the approach is to provide a tool to support the management of pastoralism and the identification, tracking and prevention of potential food crises. Identifying and prioritizing scheme sites using a territorial, multi-stakeholder approachThe desired objectives are to identify the priority actions for investment that have been agreed by local actors within the framework of the pastoral scheme, and to develop lowland areas.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ); HELVETAS -Swiss Intercooperation"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2846051061.json b/main/part_2/2846051061.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8124e7adbd4436bd75b67cd9cf00629611cffa7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2846051061.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f13a5ef5c41cf31a0e5bad031819983a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4427cc8f-861c-4771-b989-8f58e6a7ce23/retrieve","id":"-1844274468"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0f7af4d8-9059-47f5-bf21-0ad56f265d12","content":"La peste des petits ruminants (PPR) est une contrainte major aux moyens de subsistance et a la sécurité alimentaire des petits producteurs/éleveurs. L'épidémiologie et la biologie du virus de la PPR a beaucoup de choses en commun avec le virus de la peste bovine (PB), qui a été globalement éradiqué. Ce document présente une stratégie pour le contrôle progressif de la PPR en s'appuyant sur les enseignements tirés de l'éradication de la peste bovine. Le contrôle progressif de la PPR repose sur une approche modulaire consistant en une série de phases autonomes, chacune des phases ayant son propre ensemble de résultats. Les principaux résultats intermédiaires seront des modèles avérées applicables pour la fourniture de services durables pour le contrôle de la PPR et le renforcement des capacités des institutions de santé animale afin de cibler les services de contrôle pour certains points critiques. Le projet favorisera une méthode de gestion adaptée qui intègre des approches d'apprentissage qui stimuleront l'innovation institutionnelle de la santé animale. Une orientation coordonnée vers des objectifs à long terme en santé animale ajoute de la valeur aux investissements en cours dans la lutte contre les maladies infectieuses.Peste des petits ruminants (PPR), or small ruminant plague, is a viral disease primarily affecting goats and sheep that causes significant economic impact in Africa and Asia. The virus is also known to cause fatal disease in camels and asymptomatic infection of cattle and wildlife. PPR was originally recognized in West Africa in 1942 and for many years was seen as a seasonally epidemic disease in Sahelian regions. The disease was subsequently recognized in Central and Eastern Africa, the Middle East, South Asia in 1970s, 80s 90s respectively (Figure 1). Thereafter it appeared in Central Asia and most recently it entered Tibet and now threatens China.As a disease of small ruminants, PPR is noted for its impact on the livelihoods and food security of the poor and marginalized segments of society. In recent years, PPR has caused major outbreaks in East Africa and has spread to Morocco. The rest of North Africa, Southern Europe, and Southern Africa are now considered at risk of infection unless coordinated action is taken. The socio-economic losses associated with PPR mainly result from the high case mortality rates that is characteristic of the disease. This negatively affects income from production and valueaddition in marketing chains. PPR is a constraint to trade, although this impact is mitigated in local and regional markets due to its wide geographic distribution at present. Small ruminants are recognized as ready sources of food and cash and women and disadvantaged households often rely on small ruminants. Small ruminants are an important means to rebuild herds after environmental and political shocks. Thus, they are an important component of pastoral coping mechanism. The main benefits of sustained PPR control will be enhanced food security, coping mechanisms and poverty reduction.The etiologic agent is a member of the Morbillivirus genus and a close relative of rinderpest virus, a disease of cattle that has recently been globally eradicated. The eradication of RP was aided by features of the disease and available control tools that contributed to successful control. There was only one sero type and live attenuated RP vaccines gave life-long protection against all strains of the virus. There was no carrier state: infection was short lived and resulted in either death or life-long immunity. The virus did not survive for long outside the animal host: it was readily destroyed by heat, sunlight, chemicals and disinfectants. Thus, the virus needed a continuous source of new susceptible animals to survive. Proven diagnostic tests were available. PPR shares all these characteristics. At the level of animal health institutions, the eradication of RP has created an increased awareness and capacity for coordinated control interventions based upon sound epidemiological approaches that are driven by socio-economic incentives. In addition, considerable progress was made to enhance surveillance capacity, regulatory environments as well as private sector and community participation.There is now significant demand for a coherent, long-term strategy for the progressive control of PPR. This document presents a strategy for the progressive control of PPR. The initial objective is to establish sustainable control systems that benefit poor livestock keepers and national economies. The strategy is consistent with a long-term objective of eradication, but does not require a commitment to eradication at the outset. Each phase of the strategy is self-sufficient in that it will provide economically justified, durable outputs with the resources provided. Further, the strategy consists of a set of regional programs anchored in the Regional Economic Communities (RECs) and integrated in a continental framework. The principles guiding the PPR progressive control strategy depend largely on experiences to date in the animal health sector. Some salient principles are:$Q DGDSWLYH PDQDJHPHQW DSSURDFK will be taken. The progressive control program will be structured to maximize uptake of lessons learnt during the implementation of the program. The technical and institutional strategy will be updated regularly to ensure maximum relevance to current knowledge and experience.6XUYHLOODQFH DQG FRQWURO LQWHUYHQWLRQV will be risk-based and epidemiologically targeted to maximize impact and economic efficiency. Specific epidemiological research will be carried out to identify critical points for control interventions.7KH SURJUDP ZLOO FRQWLQXH WKH tradition of being innovative in surveillance and control through the incorporation of action research within on-going field activities.3DUWQHUVKLS WR PRELOL]H WKH EURDG resources of animal health institutions at national, regional and international levels 5HJLRQDO VWUDWHJLHV ZLOO EH WDLORUHG WR local small ruminant health priorities. PPR control will be combined with other activities such as vaccination against contagious caprine pleuropneumoia and/ or sheep and goat pox, provision of therapeutic services for the control of ecto and endo-parasites and other endemic diseases impacting on small ruminant production and productivity etc. to increase efficiency, broaden impact and encourage fuller participation.7KH 3DQ $IULFDQ SURJUDP ZLOO EH implemented in the context of global PPR progressive control programs and OIE principles.It is a recognised principle that the probability of disease transmission is not uniform across national populations. There are often a number of risk factors that contribute to the overall risk of disease transmission in a particular community, production system or value chain. These risk factors are often quite simple attributes of the sub-population such as the amount of movement, exchange of animals, distance from services and inter-species contact or interaction with wildlife.When the nature and distribution of risk factors for transmission and maintenance of an agent are known, it becomes possible to target surveillance and control measures to high risk settings. This maximizes impact and minimizes cost. Effective targeting of high risk communities through participatory disease surveillance was one of the factors in the success of rinderpest eradication, but can also make control programs more efficient where the goal is sustained suppression of disease and disease impact rather than eradication.The risk factors for transmission and maintenance of PPR are partially understood, but more information on the interaction of wildlife and livestock as well as on the role of specific production systems/activities would contribute to effective targeting. delivery systems that include payment for services. Thus, a range of proven service delivery models are needed as well as guidance on the conditions under which different models may be appropriate to conditions and objectives.The Pan-African PPR Strategy advocates for a period of experimentation where a series of service delivery options are evaluated under different conditions. This will build an evidence base for making informed policy decisions. The issues to be explored are:&RVW In line with the adaptive management approach, a number of learning and research activities will be undertaken to enhance the institutional capacity, technical tools and ability to target interventions. Underpinning this is the need for a clear and up-to-date understanding of the socio-economic context in which PPR progressive control is being undertaken so that interventions are delivered in a manner that allows socio-economic forces to effectively drive the program to a successful, sustainable outcome.(FRQRPLF DQDO\\VLV RI WKH LPSDFWV EHQHILW cost of progressive control, cost-effectiveness of control options, and incentives for economic contribution and participation (SLGHPLRORJLF UHVHDUFK WR EHWWHU understand transmission dynamics, the different roles of wildlife and livestock species, production systems, ecosystems and viral lineages with the goal of identifying critical points and optimal methods of intervention at critical control points.$FWLRQ UHVHDUFK DQG SROLF\\ GLDORJXH RQ public-private-community partnerships to deliver control and surveillance services. 4XHVWLRQV LQFOXGH WKH EHVW XVH RI FRPPXQLW\\ animal health workers, gender issues, and the role of producers' associations, non-JRYHUQPHQWDO RUJDQL]DWLRQV RU RWKHU FLYLO society actors in service delivery. The goal is to develop and test new business models for the VXVWDLQHG FRPPHUFLDOL]HG GHOLYHU\\ RI GLVHDVH control services *RRG GLDJQRVWLF WRROV H[LVW +RZHYHU refinement and elaboration of diagnostics will add value to the range of existing tools. Work to define minimal performance characteristics of diagnostic assays and establish bench marking procedures for diagnostic networks is QHHGHG 6WDQGDUGL]DWLRQ RI WRROV VKRXOG LQFOXGH tests for confirming outbreaks, tracking molecular epidemiology, supporting diagnostics for the field (pen-side tests) and sero-monitoring of vaccinated flocks.&XUUHQWO\\ UHFRJQL]HG YDFFLQHV EDVHG RQ the Nigeria 75/1 strain of attenuated PPR virus have been found to be safe and effective in both research trials and during widespread field use. This technology is more than sufficient for the initiation of progressive control activities. +RZHYHU LPSURYHPHQWV LQ YDFFLQH thermostability and the ability to distinguish between animals immune through vaccination $+0(' (/6$:$/+< -())5(< & 0$5,1(5 ',&.(16 &+,%(8 +(15< :$0:$<, 6$08(/ :$.+86$0$ :,//,$0 2/$+208.$1, $1' 3+,//,3 72<(The Pan African PPR Strategy will be anchored in the regional economic communities in order to ensure strong ownership and local relevance. Control interventions that address local small ruminant health priorities will be bundled to ensure maximum impact at the household level and strong producer participation. and those that are immune due to recovery from natural infection would be advantageous. 1. Several approaches to thermostable vaccines have been described to the level of proof of concept. More work is needed to compare alternative approaches and to develop a full database on thermostability as an evidence base to support the confident roll out of a thermostable vaccine on a broad scale. 2. Research to develop a marked vaccine and complementary serological tests as part of a differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA) strategy for vaccines based on the Nigeria 75/1 strain will be supported.The Pan PPR strategy will support research as an integral part of the coordination activity. As was the experience with RP eradication, optimal impact of research resulted from research embedded in the action program. Independent research will also be encouraged. Key research stakeholders in PPR and morbillivirus research are the reference laboratories recognized by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), the Joint Division of FAO and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), National Diagnostic Laboratories and National Agricultural Research Services (NARS) and academic institutions where appropriate. As in the past, the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as a source of innovation and a valuable partner for action research and field validation of new approaches will continue.One of the lessons learnt from the global eradication of rinderpest was that effective coordination adds value to animal health investment by channelling otherwise divergent activities towards a coherent and sustainable objective. A sense of ownership among stakeholders contributes to the success of coordinated programs.The role of coordination is to convene inclusive dialogue to define and refine strategies, to harmonize approaches across regions and the continent, to assist in the process of governance including the development of policy, regulations and legislation. Coordination means knowledge management and information exchange. Guidance on monitoring and evaluation activities is considered an important coordination task. Coordination includes strong action to advocate for program support in technical, political and financial terms at all levels.AU-IBAR is best placed to coordinate the Pan African PPR Strategy due to the recognition of their:Continental mandate as the organization of African states for the coordination of the utilization of animal resources Proven leadership in RP eradication African ownership and strong commitment Convening authority in Africa It is the policy of the African Union that programs are implemented through the regional economic communities (RECs) (Figure 2). Following this policy, the Pan African PPR Strategy can develop locally appropriate strategies that address regional small ruminant health problems thus assuring greater participation and impact. Working through the RECs, will also enhance ownership.At the national level, veterinary services will lead program activities. It is anticipated that veterinary services will act in a manner consistent with the principles of good governance and seek to facilitate and manage activities by creating an enabling environment for broad stakeholder participation. It is anticipated that national services will work with private practitioners, veterinary associations, community-based organizations/programs, producers and producer associations, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) as well as value chain stakeholders and trading partners to implement PPR progressive control.Key partners for research and diagnostics service networks are the OIE and FAO Morbillivirus Reference Centers, ILRI, national diagnostic laboratories, IAEA and NARS. In terms of vaccine, AU-PANVAC and vaccine producers are key partners. The program will undertake to facilitate the production of high quality vaccine as an essential input.International organizations such as the OIE and FAO are essential partners. It is anticipated that the Pan African Strategy will be implemented in the context of a global program facilitated by the international organizations. The OIE's leadership in terms of establishing standards for participation in trade and achievable pathways to national freedom from disease will play a key role in shaping the strategy.One of the lessons from rinderpest was that the NGOs played several key roles in facilitating eradication. In fact, eradication would not have been accomplished without them. They often stepped forward to create service delivery systems in some of the most daunting and dangerous environments. The NGOs also took the lead in the animal health institutional enhancements that were conditions for the success of rinderpest eradication as well as being positive outcomes in their own right. Finally, the NGOs have been key partners in the validation of new approaches and the empowerment of stakeholders to advocate for animal health institutional change.Effective knowledge management will be an important component of the coordination strategy. AU-IBAR will act as the host organization in terms of collating information on the disease situation and disease impact. National reporting through the ARIS-2 system will be strengthened with appropriate attention to digital reporting technologies for field use. In this manner, progressive control of PPR will have knock-on benefits in terms of better information exchange. Every effort will be made to harmonize disease reporting systems across the region and globally.AU-IBAR will host forums for sharing of knowledge on epidemiology, vaccines and diagnostics, and animal health institutions that bring together diverse professionals specialized in action, learning and discovery. The knowledge management unit will seek to develop new applications for information exchange that take advantage of the revolution in social networking technologies. The goal will be to maximize adaptive learning and to promote progressive evolution in practices and policies. To this end, the knowledge management unit will maintain up to date guidance documents on strategy, technical tools, and policy on the web.The foundation of the adaptive management approach is a complete study of the lessons from RP eradication. To this end, the initial stages of the Pan African PPR Strategy call for objective assessments of the interventions implemented as part of RP eradication. These studies should look at institutional, economic, environmental and epidemiological impact of the global eradication.One salient lesson from RP eradication was that not enough was done to measure impact. The Pan African PPR Strategy proposes that action should be taken to maximize learning in order to institutionalize adaptive management from the outset. To accomplish this, the program will gather baseline information and establish sets of process and performance indicators, impact indicators and desired outcomes. Animal health institutional change and capacity development is critical to the success of progressive control. In order to maximize learning in this area, a more systematic approach to understanding animal health institutions and institutional change will be undertaken. This will include: Institutional mapping Documenting service delivery systems and their performance Documenting surveillance systems and their performance Analysis of incentives and drivers for participation as they relate to the abovePPR is an important constraint to food security and the livelihoods of poor farmers. Existing knowledge, experience and technology provide a solid platform for embarking on program of progressive control of PPR across Africa. The progressive control program will take an adaptive approach that seeks to learn from program experiences to continuously enhance impact and efficiency. The coordination of efforts to control PPR will add value to current investments to mitigate epidemics or activities seeking to promote food security. Responsible coordination and programming of inputs that reflect economic and epidemiological realities of PPR are needed."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2853668896.json b/main/part_2/2853668896.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e68a356939b7aef0baf803ef5f3397b8250db928 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2853668896.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"73381856f11451d7eaf29152fe62a6c0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/202c59ba-b3b8-4c61-874d-d305b8fadcb4/retrieve","id":"-1093692669"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f361e4c0-51ca-4826-84a6-6902611ecacf","content":"P771 -Shaping equitable climate change policies for resilient food systems across Central America and the Caribbean Description: This plan, developed participatory consultations in 6 departments, provides clear guidelines to address short and medium-term challenges caused by climate changes in the production and marketing of beans in Honduras.• I2580 -Method to formulate local plan for adaptation to climate change (https://tinyurl.com/2nnojew7)• # of countries/states where CCAFS priority setting is used to target and implement interventions to improve food and nutrition security under a changing climate Sub-IDOs:• 28 -Increased resilience of agro-ecosystems and communities, especially those including smallholders• 35 -Enabled environment for climate resilience"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2879836036.json b/main/part_2/2879836036.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..95e2a8fae930d532cd41645914a192ca59a83910 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2879836036.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"405aac2f6b343d5b02aea663d72845e6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/291bba8c-d0de-46b0-968b-ae8c79cd0ecd/retrieve","id":"-1096702087"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"590436c9-f127-4ebe-8e70-aa95cddccb80","content":"This paperpresenls a case study based on Ihe findings in two villages in easlem Vttar Pradesh, India, part of a project started in 1997 to develop, test. and refine methodologíes of participatory research and gender analysis as they apply to the development ofnew technologies in germplasm and natural resouree managemen!. The two villages oecupy different agroecologiea1 areas and also differ in sociocultural characteristics. Both male and female farmers were included in Ihe study, and details oftheirpreferences for Ihe rice varieties studied are presenled in Ihis paperodebate among the members. However, they were able lO agree upon the major domains for each landrace/variety. They also reported that sorne oflhe landraceslvarieties were grown in more than one domain but Ihe cases were limited.In Kachorwa, of Ihe four domains identified by the farmers, two--ucha and pokharí/man-were extreme cases (dry land and rainfed; wet-Iand conditions, respectively). No modem varieties were grown in Ihese areas. Only landraces were found growing under such conditions, and the number of landraces (cultivars) was relatively small compared to other domains. Samtal and nícha represented better growing environments, wilh a grea!er number of landraces and modem varieties growing Ihere. Samtal represented Ihe major domain in terms of area. There was considerable area under uccha bu! no! much area was under nicha and pokahri. Severallandraces and modem varieties (MVs) were common lo both samtal and nicha. These two domains were more productive in terms of crop production as well.Similar results were found when Ihe exercise was repeated in Ihe Begnas eco-site under mid-hill conditions. However, Ihe domain delineation was less c1ear-cut Ihan ít was in Kachorwa because several of Ihe landraces and MV s were found in more than one dornain. Here again, landraceslvarieties were no! repeated in more than two dornains, and lha! in adjacent domains only. Jumping of domains by certain landraces/varieties was not observed in eilher of Ihe exercises. Allhough several ofthe landraces and MV s were found in two domains, Iheir performance was judged as best only in one domain. Based on Ihe information generated from Ihe discussion wilh farmers, it could be deduced that a landrace/variety fits best only in one domain. It exists in olher domains because Ihere ls no competitive variety to replace it.Having achieved a high degree of agreement between farmers and researchers in Ihe defmition of agroecological domains, it was decided to field-verif)' the definitions through a transect walk and to look for consistency in Ihe field implementation. A representative group offarmers made a transect walk of Ihe eco-site along wilh researchers. They identified domains and located landraces/varieties on different farms. The exercise helped in relating different agroecological domains and Iheir characteristics with Ihé landraceslvarieties being grown Ihere. Thus, Ihis exercise needs to be conducted when the rice crop ls mature or when Ihe crop is standing in Ihe field.Based on the analysis oflhe characteristics of different agroecological domains and Ihe distribution oflandraces/varieties within domains, an attempt lo develop a conceptual model of agroecological domains for rice was made (figure 1). In Ihe following subsections, Ihe characteristíc features of the domains have been explained. Nevertheless, Ihe model needs verification in a larger context and further refinement for wider applicability.Local farmers can provide very reliable inforrnation on Ihe agroecological domains for rice. Similarly, farmers can provide detailed features of each domain in terms of soíl type, drainage, fertility status, production potential, cropping patterns, and so on.The size of agroecological domains varies, with more extreme environments (domains) being relatively smaller as compared to more favorable ones. This follows normal distribution curve. How- Doma!n 4 ever, depending upon fue geographic location (high-potential production systems or marginal growing envíronrnents), the size of each domain will vary. For instance, in marginal environrnents for rice, fue extreme domain will be relatively larger as compared to ofuer domains; whereas, in favorable environrnents, the míddle domains will be relatively larger.Until fue distribution oflandráces/varieties across domains, the features of domains, and fue traits of cultivars are analyzed, one cannot appreciate fue complexity of farroers' strategies to manage plant genetic resourees to meet fueir multiple needs. From the analysis, it is apparent that one landrace/variety is best suited or most competitive in only one domain, though farroers might grow the same cultivar in more fuan one domain. This implies that fue cultivar competes wifu ofuer cultivars trom within the domain, and that there is less competition between cultivars across domains, except when fuere is an overlap of cultivars. Overlap signifies the presence of transitional zones between dornains, which explains fue presence of landraceslvarieties in two different but adjacent dornains. Within dornajns, fue area and number of households growing different landraceslvarieties is explained by rnarket forces, farrocrs' socioeconomic status, cultural factors, preferences for specific traits, and ofuer abiotic and biotjc factors.Alfuough landrsces/varieties rnay overlap in adjacent dornains, no case was registered where a landrsce/variety was found in more fuan two dornajns. This suggests fuat landraces/varietíes have very specific adaptatíons. In ofuer words, it reinforces fue idea that a cultivar is most cornpetítive in only one dornaín.Landraceslvanetíes falling wíthin the sarue domaín are more likely to be similar in their genetic cornposition as cornpared to landraces/varietíes frorn dissimilar dornains. The logic behind is that they have been put under similar managernent condítions have been selected over time fo! adaptation. However, this hypolhesis needs lo be proved from laboratory analysis of sorne of the saruples frorn each domaín. If it proves tme, then there ís a strong case, from a conservation point ofview, for disaggregating genetic materials across agroecologícal domains. Nevertheless, this process still holds true where diversity deployrnent is the prime objective of the project.The distribution oflandraces/vaneties in different domains is the result of farmers' experimentation with those landraces/vaneties over years. In other words, they are the \"best fit\" under farmers' rnanagement conditions. Therefore, researchers definítely need to know the characteristics of each dornain, as well as the specific traits of the landraces/vaneties in each domain and their distribution across dornains in order to make any intervention in the present system. The anaIysis of agroecological domains is worth the money and time invested in collecting and analyzing the information.Planning conservation strategies for landraces ldentifYing landraees that are grown in small areas by a limited number of farrners and devising ways and rneans of conserving them might seem to be a straightforward task for conserving endangered landraces. Sornetirnes, weighted diversity, as well, might be computed for facilitating Ihe decision-makíng process in choosing which landraces to focus on for conservation when there are numerous landraces falling in the endangered category. However, all these processes and steps consider the diversity oflandraces at the aggregatedllandscape (cornmuníty) level and thus ignore the influence of agroecological domains in deterrniníng the position oflandraees in different dornains.The need for micro-Ievel analysis emerges from the faet that landraces are conditioned over years by their continued growth and selection over time in specific dornains. As a result, Ihey have developed adaptive traits, wruch are uníque 10 landraces falling in that domain. Therefore, analysis of landrace diversity at the aggregated level fails 10 appreciate the position oflandraces in specifie dornains, which in faet might be harboring genes of irnportanl traits. Selecting landraces frorn an aggregated list rnight exclude, certaÍn strategically important landraces from conservation.PPB has been used as one rneans 10 conserve useful genes in landraces through crossing with modem vaneties. However, there could be number of landraces withín a domain that might require sorne forrn of conservation (through breeding and nonbreeding means). Understanding Ihe features of domains and the distribution oflandraces in them will facilitate decision rnakíng about selecting landraces for conservation. Failing to do this could result in selecting landraces with similar genetic traits for conservation (vía PPB) from jusI one or two domaÍns. This would lead lo the neglect of sorne and overrepresentation of olhers.Diversity deployrnenl in simple terrn means \"províding farmers wilh options of genetie materials 10 choose frorn.\" The introduction ofnew genetic material results in temporal disequilibrium because of competition between existing and new genetic material. The competition is for space in farmers' fields, for farm labor, for capital inputs, and so on. As time elapses, Ihe new entrant finds its rightful ss. Rana el aL place in Ihe given environment. This is Ihe outcome of farmers constantly tryíng to rnaintain an equilibrium (meeting farmers' objectives) in terms ofstabilizing yield and production over time.The strategy for diversity deployment must begin by analyzing the distribution oflandraces/varieties across agroecological dornains. Once this is done, researchers would have a clear picture of each domain, aIong with the dístríbutíon of landraces/varíeties, and the dominance of certain cultivars against others would becorne evident Researchers would also come to know the reasons for this dominance. Only then could Ihey develop their strategy for diversíty deployrnent. In the absence of this ínformation, new genetic materials míght fit into domains where there is not much cornpetitíon.It could also happen that new genetic rnateríals compete with each other landraceslvarieties in similar domains, resulting in limited impact of diversity deployrnent.The conflict between breeding varíeties for wide adaptability or for ruche environments will perhaps go on. (Wide adaptability rneans Ihe dornain for which the suítability ofthe landrace/variety is large. Niche environment means the domain for the given landrace/varíety is limited.) In Ihe truest sense, wide adaptabilíty should encompass Ihe ability of a cultivar to be grown in several different domains and vice versa for the ruche environment. However, such is not the case.Whatever Ihe case, the proponents of PPB rnust bear in mind that the approach has to prove its worth in terms of chuming out farmer-acceptable varieties efficiently on such a scale that Ihe economic return on investrnent is positive. But this is possible only when researchers have a clear knowledge of the size and characteristics•ofthe dornains the new varíety will fit into. In addition, Ihey also need to know Ihe likely existing cultivar to be replaced Without this inforrnation, it would be rather difficult to estirnate the potential adoption ceiling ofPPB varietíes, which irnplíes that the estimation of economic returns at the household leve! ig difficult. This will becorne an increasingly important issue in the future, when enough time has elapsed between Ihe developrnent and adoptionldissemination of PPB varíeties and Ihe evaluation of their irnpact.Another important issue that can be addressed by analyzing agroecological domains is oríenting PPB programs towards \"poverty aIleviation\" and food securíty at the household leve!. Since resource-poor farmers rnainly own marginalland, Ihere is limited varietal choice. By conducting PPB programs using landraces from marginal environments, the chances of providing greater options in such environments is' increased, which would contríbute to food security, particularly in resource-poor households. Targeting PPB for equity ofbenefits for the resource-poor can also be justified aIong similar lines.Agroecological delineation using key informants/farmers from fue given cornmunity can be reliably done. The identified dornains and the associated varieties in each domain have 10 be verífied through a transect walk with the key informants. This exercise helps príorítize landraceslvaríeties in each domain based on Ihe number ofhouseholds growing them and Ihe area covered. Using lhis information, a selection oflandraces/varieties for PPB work could be made. Diversity deployment and conservatíon of certain landraces/varieties could also be planned using this information. The argurnents presented here clearly índicate the need to focus PPB irutíatives on marginal environments for which Ihere are no MVs, and where, al the same time, the majoríty oflhe resource-poor dwell. This exercise has to be conducted prior to initiating PPB work in a given area. Information required to delineate agroecological domains and associated landraces/varieties can easily be gathered using key informants at the vilIage leve!. It has been suggested that this exercise be incorporated as a component of PPB work.Decisions about the adoption oftechnology are conditional to farmers' perceptions ofthe performance of a new technology relative to that of the technology currently being practiced. Farmers may assess a new technology, such as an improved variety, in terms of a range of attributes, such as grain quality, straw yield, and inpu! requirements, in addition to grain yield (Traxler and Byerlee 1993). In Orissa, eastern India, farmers indicated preference not only for the visual appearance of rice grain, but also for attributes such as cooking quality, taste, keeping quality, and straw quality (Kshirsagar, Pandey, and Bellon 1997). If fimners perceive an improved variety to be inferior to traditional varieties in terms of one or more attributes, they are unlikely to adopt such a variety (Adesina andZinnah 1993, as cited by Kshirsagar, Pandey, andBellon 1997). Crop improvement could potentially benefit from farmers' assessments of the relative performance of different varieties under farmer management. Information on the traits desired by farmers and their knowledge of the production system could be invaluable in setting the goals of a breeding program, delineating the target environment, identifying the parents for breeding and defining the management treatment for breeding work (Sperling ・ セ @ al. 1996; Eyzaguirre and Iwanaga 1996).Varietal preferences may differ, not only between socioeconomic groups bu! also by gender.In a farmer-participª1ory breeding (FPB) project on pearl millet in the Jodhpur district, Rajasthan, India, grain yield, early availability of grain, and the case ofharvesting by hand (lower paniele number and lower plant height) were the main considerations for making selections by women. For the men, yield and quality appeared 10 be a stronger eoneern (W' eltzien, Whitaker, and Anders 1996). WhiJe women have traditionally been seed selectors and managers of germplasm in low-input farrning systems, scientists have no! given enough attention to their local knowledge, eriteria for selection, and perceptions regarding new seeds untiJ recently, F or instance, the criteria for selecting seeds, practices of animal care and food processing, and the consequent preferences for different kinds of blending various food materials are useful starting points for building on women'g perspectives in particípatory research (Gupta et al. 1996). Another example is when high labor demands for manual tbreshing may create incentives for women to adopt vaneties that are easier to thresh (Adcsina and Forson 1995). Including women in the early evaluation of varieties ensures that new seeds can be adopted rapidly, Thus, men's and women's entena and preferences for rice vaneties should be well understood and considered in plant-breeding strategies, In March 1997, a farmer-participatory planl-breeding program for raínfed nce was developed at the Intemational Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in collaboration with the Indían Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), This project inc\\udes síx research siles representing different nce ecosystems in eastem India, The project is under the umbrella ofthe CGIAR's Systemwíde Initiative on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis. The goal of this iniliative is to develop, test, and refine methodologies of participatory research and gender analysis as they apply to Ihe development ofnew technologies in germplasm and natural resource management. This FPB projecl aims lo test the hypothesis that farmer particípation in rainfed nce breeding can help develop suilable vaneties more efficiently, It is also designed to identifY the stages in a breeding program where farmer ínterfacing is optimaL The project has two components: the first is a plant-breeding component, whích aíms to develop and evaluate a methodology for participatory improvement of rice for heterogeneous environments, and to produce and improve adoption of matenal suíting farmers' needs. The second is a socÍal-science component (including gender analysis) that aims (1) to characterize cropping systems, diversíty ofvanetíes grown, and the crop-management practices ofrice farmers, (2) to analyze male and female farmers' selection criteria and their reactions to a range of cultivars and breeding lines, and (3). to enhance the capacities of national agricultural research systems (NARS) in participatory research and gender analysis in plant breeding andrice vanetal selection (Courtoís et al. 2000), Thís paper focuses on farmers' selectíon cnteria and their reactions to a range of cultivars and breeding lines UIlder particÍpatory vanetal selection conducted on farmers' fields,The results of the socioeconomic and gender analysÍs in the FPB project includes only two villages (table 1): Mungeshpur in the Faizabad district and Basalatpur in the Siddathnagar district, eastem Vttar Pradesh. These sites are among the research sites UIlder the FPB project. A similar study was conducted in the other FPB research sites in Onssa and Madhya Pradesh, Basalatpur represents favorable (but submergence prone) lowland, rainfed arcas, Mungeshpur represents shallow, submergence-prone areas that are favorably rainfed during years of low rainfalL Basalatpur and Mungeshpur have a rugher proportion of lowland fields (70% and 60%, respectively) with heavier soil and good water-holding capacity, The flow of natural resources like rainwater (field hydrological conditions) tbroughout the season has also had a major impact on vanetal selection in these villages, F armers in Mungeshpur have more access to supplementary irrigation, wruch enables them to diversífY into other crops, partÍCularly vegetables and fodder crops, Only one diesel pump exists ín Basalatpur and trus limits crop diversífication. The importance of livestock between the two villages also differs, Livestock in Mungeshpur is more importan! than in Basalatpur, In Mungeshpur, bullocks continue to be used for Jand preparation, and tbreshing is done manually, In contrast, land preparation and threshing in Basalatpur is mechanized with the use of tractors, The degree of market onentatíon is higher in Basalatpur (nearer the cíty) where more rice is sold, The majority ofthe farming households are owner-cultivators, and share cropping is oflimited importance. F emale labor participation in rice production is four times hígher than that of males in Basalatpur and three-fourths in Mungesphur. There is wide disparity in terms of access 10 education between men and women. In general, females have lower literacy rates than meno The differences in resource endowments, socioeconomic status, importance aflivestock, degree ofmarket orientation, gender roles and responsibilities in rice production, and family size may determine the choice of rice varieties/cultivars and agronomic management practices.Rice followed by wheat + mustard is the predominant cropping pattem in al! villages. In BasaIatpur, wheat and oilseed are grown mainly for domestic use, but rice is grown for consumption as welI as marketing. On the other hand, in Mungeshpur, rice 18 mainIy grown for consumption because oflow yields and low marketabIe surplus. Rice is followed by wheat + mustard, which are grown for both domestic consumption and sale. Land preparation for rice is started in June after the arrival afthe monsoon. The majority of the respondents belong to the lower social class, with small-sized landholdings.Females are younger and have lower literacy rates, compared to males, and have over 20 years of farming experience. The extent of female participation in rice production is high in both villages. Sorne tasks in rice production and postharvest operations are gender specific. Land preparation and the application of chemicals are men's responsibilities in both villages (10% of fertilizer application is done by women in Basalatpur). In Mungeshpur, women from the lower social status dominate in the work of pulling seedlings (100%), transplanting (70%), weeding (80%), applying farrnyard manure (60%), harvesting (82%), and threshing (82%). In Basalatpur, more men than women participate in pulling seedlings and harvesting. Women do the transplanting of seedlings (100%) and most ofthe weeding (75%), with men doing most ofthe spraying (90%). Women are also mainly responsible for postharvest activities such as cleaning and selecting the seeds for the next season, storage, and processing rice into other food products for home consumption and for sale. They are the primary end-users of rice byproducts and biomass for livestock and other farm use. A village study in eastem India revealed that women from the lower castes provided 60% to 80% ofthe total labor input in rice production (Paris et al. 1996). Aside from their significant contributions in rice production, women also provide labor in non-rice crops, collect green animal fodder, and feed and tend Iivestock. Thus, men's and women'g preferences for specifíc traits in rice varieties may differ, based on gender-specific roles and responsibilities. With inereasing male migration lo cities, women are laking on more responsibilities as farm managers, aside from theír normal household and childcare responsibilities (Paris el aL 1996).The rice varieties eurrently grown by farrners are shown in table 3. Traditional varieties are more cornrnon in Basalatpur than in Mungeshpur. Although modern varieties (MVs) show higher adoption rates in Mungeshpur, these varieties ofien suffer from submergenee, drought, and stress al reproduetive and ripening phases when the erop is planted late. Most farrners felt that traditional varieties are more tolerant to drought, submergenee, pests, and diseases, while MV s performed well under irrigated conditions. The majority of the farrners indieated that they felt that MVs needed better management lhan traditionaI varieties. Modero varieties need more labor, higher levels of fertilízer, and more irrigation, but more farmers prefer to grow MV s because of their higher yields. Farrners generally match varieties wíth their environment. For rainfed rice, this means an adaptation to the hydrological conditions of their fields, Each field position in the topo-sequence corresponds to a risk of drought or submergence. The drought risk inercases frorn the bottom to the top of the topo-sequence, while submergence risk decreases along the same path, assocíated with progressively lower water depths and earlier recession of the water. This translates into different ideotypes for the different situations. Medium-duration fields are grown mostly in medium land. Varieties such as Sarju-52. Ashwani. NDR-359. Pant-4. -10, and-12. andIndrasan are grownon the fields thatare located in between upper and lower levels oí land type. Fanners of Mungeshpur prefer to grow these varieties on the these land types on the belief that they need optimum moisture during the growth period. Fields dif-in Basalatpur; therefore, sorne farrners prefer to grow medium varieties on upland fields also.To determine whether there are gender differences in perceptions of useful traits in varietal adoption, we used graphic illustrations of traits. We first showed cards that illustrate useful traits in selecting rice varieties. We then asked each farmer what traits he or she consider in selecting rice varieties for specific land types-upland and lowland fields. To assess how farmers valued each trait, we asked the question, \"If you had 100 paisa, how much would you pay for each trait? The value in paisa allocated to a particular trait corresponded to the importance given by the fanner. Because many traÍts are interrelated, we rec1assified them in consultation with a plant breeder. For example, we grouped traits such as ease in hullíng and mílling recovery under postharvest quality. Table 2 shows the seleetion eriteria of male and female fanners for different land types and villages.In the lowland areas in Basalatpur, yield and duratíon are the most important trait5 maJe and female farmers consider in selection rice varieties, In this village, the popular traditional varieties are Bengalía, Oríswa, and Kuwari mashuri. These are short-duration (90-110 days), medium-height varieties, The average yields are 2.5 tons per hectare, Farmers prefer short-duration rice varíeties in the uplands because of the importance of growing early winter crops such as oilseed, linseed, pulses, peas, and potatoes. They prefer to parboil Bengalia; otherwise, its grains break easíly. Women in Basalatpur use traditional rice varietíes for making puffed rice and churra, beaten rice Iike cornflakes .. For women who continue to use the traditional method ofhand-pounding rice, postharvest qualities such as ease ofhulling and mgh milling recovery are additional useful traits. The men did not mention these. The finding that women are more concerned !han men with postharvest traits and milling recovery are similar to the findings in a participatory breeding project in the hígh altitudes in NepaL Sthapít, 10sm, and Wítcombe (1996) also observed that women farmers are particularly skillfuJ in assessing postharvest traits, such as milling recovery, and the cooking and eating quality of rice. They found that the evaluation scores between maJe and femaJe farmers in Chhomrong village showed significant agreement. Women farmers reported ¡hat they would like to decide on varíety selection after the postharvest evaluation. Consumers preferred wmte-grained rice to red-pericarped rice because it saves women time in milling.In Basalatpur, both male and female farmers agreed upon the important traits fo! 10wland rice varieties. Grain price is an important cohsiderlltion for farmers here because they seU traditional varíet-¡es in the market. These, like Kalamanak, command a higher price because oftheir good taste and aroma. Kalamanak gives Iow yields of 1.5 to 2 tons per hectare. In contrast, grain price is not an important consideration in Mungeshpur because rice ís mainly used for home consumption and is seldom sold in the market.In Mungeshpur, both male and female farmers agreed upon important traits in selecting varieties for the uplands. Women gave more importance to postharvest qualities and grain quality such as bold and pure graíns. For the lowlands, both males and females cited better grain yield, medium duration (125-135 days), bioniass, and resistance to abiotic stress as their selection critería for lowland rice varíeties. Women gave greater weight to better adaptation to specific soH types and to grain quality. Women mentioned additional useful traits for varíeties in the uplands and lowlands that were not mentioned by men: competitiveness with weeds and postharvest quality. Weeds are the major problem in the uplands, particularly when rice is direct-seeded. In the lowlands, weeds are more prevalent during drought. These additional traits are related to the roles and responsibilities of female farnily members (e.g., hand weeding and feeding rice straw to livestock).During the 1999 monsoon season, two farmers from each of the villages of Mungeshpur and Saríyawan (rainfed neighboring village) ofthe Faizabad district and from Basalatpur were selected to check the performance of rice genotypes in their fields. The genotypes were (1) advanced lines from a shuttle breeding project from Uttar Pradesh, (2) released varieties, and (3) the most common local varieties. Of the 14 genotypes screened in Basalatpur, two are scented varíetíes (Kamini, which flowers in 136 days, and Sugandha, which flowers in 124 days). Scientists distributed the seeds through the FPB project. In this approach, breeders select the most promising lines with farmers, and farmers are given a \"basket of choices,\" growing several genotypes in their specific environments.Ten farmers (five women and five men) visited the individual plots and ranked the rice genotypes grown on farmers' fields past the maturity stage. Farmers were asked to rank the rice lines from I (exceIlent) to 14 or 16 (worst) on the basis ofvisual assessment. The rankings ofthe new cultivars by the farmers generated an n x k matrix, where n equals the lines being evaluated and k equals the farmers evaluating the crop performance. KendaIl's Coefficient ofConcordance (W) was used to measure the agreement in rankings arnong male farmers and among female farmers, and the correlation between male and female farmers' rankings. High and significant correlation values indicate cIose agreement on the ranking of the rice genotypes by men and women in the sample.Tables 5a to 5d show that in the two villages, male and female evaluators were in cIose agreement in the ranking ofthe lines. The Ws were highly significant, revealing that farmers' and breeders' rankings are ofien acceptable. Table 6 shows the surnmary of the ranking of male farmers, female farmers, and plant breeders indicating their choices. Ofthe 14 and 16 varieties ranked in Basalatpur and Mungeshpur, PVS 1, PVS3, PVS7, PVS9, PVSlO, and PVSI5 carne out as the farmers' and breeders' choices in 1999. The traits of these lines are shown on table 7. During the crop season in 2000, several ofthese lines were compared with local check through PVS. Twenty-three farmers in two villages in Faizabad grew three rice lines, while 50 farmers in six villages in Siddathnagar grew six rice lines obtained from PVS trials. Mrs. Yadav is 53 years old, iIliterate, and a fuIl-time farmer. Her husband is a full-time worker in the 110ur and oil milis. This makes her ¡he de jacto head ofhousehold. She supervises ¡he farm and makes decisions regarding what crops and varieties to grow. Three years ago, she grew mostly local varieties because of a lack of irrigation facilities. We gave her seeds of NDR 97, a new variety, which she planted on 0.10 ha of land. Later she increased the area planted lo this variety lo 0.5 ha.She told us the positive traits she likes in this variety, such as suitability ro her land type, good taste, shorter duration, good milling recovery, ease of threshing, and medium height, and negative traits such as less rice straw:1 tried many varieties since the las! jour lo five yeors such as Saket4 and NDR80. but because they were damoged by drought and disease, 1 slopped growing Ihem. 1 don 't like the taste of Sarju52. lt is coarse and does not rema in sofi afier cookíng. Jt also does not have many broken grains afier milling. So we sold Sarju52 and used NDR359 for home consumption. One thing 1 noticed with the straw ofNDR359 is that it is sofi. so instead of storing it for a long time, we had lO feed ít immediafely fo our anima/s. 1/ we keep the straw for two to three months, it will not be very easy lO cut and the animals will refuse to eat ít. lnstead ojleaving the rice stalles to dry in the fie/d. which is our usual practice, we immediately thresh afier harvesting. lis short duration also enab/es me to grow another crop during the rabi season.Mrs. T. B Singh, 50 years old, belongs to the upper caste. Due lo labor shortages during the peak season and Ihe lack of male labor (her husband is fully engaged in a nonfarm job), she has been forced to provide physicallabor in most of Ihe rice operations. She was able to finish five years in school. She is the decision maker in !he household and is quite knowledgeable about farming. In 1997, she was one of Ihe collaborators of!he project. Afier testing 13 genotypes on her field, she obtained 5.2 tons per ha from PVS5 (NDRSB9730015), so she decided to continue to grow Ihis variety and expand the area during Ihe 1998 kharif season. She expecled to get six tons per ha, but because of drought, Ihere were many unfilled grains. She told us about Ihe variety's positive traits aside from its high yield:1 prefer PVS5 because of Its medium duration; medium bold, cylindrical grain; resistance to pesls and diseases; and better mil/ing recovery.In 1995, we gave her new seeda of BKP246.1 like this variety too because it is suítable for the lowland rainfed area, has good yields, and is not susceptible to diseases. I like the size and the shape ofthe grain-medium and boldo It a/so has the best milling recovery and commands a high price in the market. In 1998, 1 sold four quíntals of paddy at Rs 400 per quintal, while the o/her varieties are Rs 50 less than BFK246. We use Sarju52 and Saket4 for home consumption. Saket4 has fine graíns and matures early, a trait ideal for the uplands. Our agricultural workers prefer coarse graíns, which last longer in the stomach than paddy with finer grains. I observed that the quantity ofstraw ofBFP346 is less, but grain quality is more important 10 USo Mr. Bansat Lal , 42 years old, an ilIiterate father !rom the backward caste, is a full-time fanner. Hís sons are fully engaged in nonfann activíties and his daughter-in-Iaw supervises fann activities and takes part in decision making. In 1997, he was a collaborator in the plant vanetal-selection program and obtaíned good yields. After threshing and mílling, the female members of his household al so agreed that the PVS5 (NDRSB97300 15) and PVS6 (NDRSB9730020) should be grown the following year. Both Mr. Lal and his daughter-in-law have the same criteria for selection, such as better yield, good qualíty of straw, medium height, resistance to pests and diseases, longer and fine grains, no broken grains after milling, softness and expansion after cooking.My daughter-in-law observed that PVS5 is easy to hull through hand pounding afier parboiling. Jt is a/so good for puffed rice. Mr. Lal shared the seeds ofPVS5 with other fanners. In 1998, he cultivated PVS5 and PVS6 on his 3 bigha (0.3 ha) land area. He was able to obtain a yieldofsix quintals per bigha inone pIot and four quintals in another plot. These yielils were higher than those in nearby fields.Socioeconomic surveys revealed that a major determinant of vanetal choice is the eonsCÍous attempt of fanners to match vaneties with the land type. Each field position in the topo-sequence corresponds to a risk of drought or submergence. In Mungeshpur (shallow and submergenceprone) fanners' eritena for selecting rice vaneties are associated mainly with duration (short to medium), for growing rabi crops after rice in the upland fields, and with better yield. A second determining factor is the adaptation to different user needs: food, livestock fodder, thatching, and cash. A third detennining factor is related to different postharvest operations like ease ofthreshing, good taste, high mil!ing recovery (above 65%), good storage capacity, and premium market price. Gender-specific roles and responsibilíties also determine vanetal preferences. For example, women prefer medium or semi-tal! vaneties that are easier to thresh, as well as vaneties that have a good quantity and quality of rice straw for livestock feed. Moreover, they prefer vaneties for the specific rice products that they make. While it may be difficult to combine all their preferred traits into one unique vanety because of genetic correlations, it is ímportant that both men and women have a \"basket of choices\" of vaneties suited to their needs and agroecosystems. elearly, Iistening to fanners' perceptions and involving both men and women fanners in selecting rice varieties at the early stage of breeding can lead to faster adoption of varieties suited to their specific rice ecosysteros and diverse needs. In many regions of the world farmers routinely produce seeds for their staple crops. 111is i5 partículady cornmon in regions where agricultural production is affected by frequent and unpredíctable droughts, as in most areas where pearl millet (PennÍsetum glaucum [L.] R.BL),a cross-pollínating crop, is grown. Under these harsh climatie conditions, fanners have developed landraces that tend to show good levels of tolerance to these environments. 111e farmers have also evolved strategies for maintaining seed during drought years in order to safeguard food production and animal foddeL Given the fuet that formal plant-breeding programs have failed to develop superior varieties for marginallands and low-input conditions, the main objective ofthe study presented here is to better understsnd farmers' own seed-management pmctices as a basis for planning and implementing participatory strategíes that capitalize on fanners' local knowledge. This approach would aliow researchers to then conCentrate on specific weaknesses that farmers' own selection pmctices cannot effectively address.To date, these local strategies, including the fanners' needs and preferences, along with details of their cropping systems, are not familiar to scientists involved in conventional breeding programs. The objectives of this projeet are listed below: l. To describe farmers' own crop-improvement activíties in regard to yieJd, quality, and diversity of pearl míllet, with special emphasis on seed-management strategies, such as introgression of modem varieties, seJection, storage, processing, exchange, and procurement 2. To quantifY the effects of farmer activities on the genetic structure and performance ofpearl millet populationsRajasthan ís situated in the northwest ofIndia (figure 1). It is a semi-arid regíon wíth a mean annual rainfaU that ranges !Tom < 250 mm in the westem part (Thar Desert) to > 650 mm in the southeast (figure 2). In this study, we refer only to the westem part ofthe state, where farmers must make do with ¡ess than 350 mm of annual rainfall, with high variabilíty!Tom year to year. Experienced farmers often talk of a 10-year cyc1e in which two seasons have good raíns, two have severe drought with crop failures, and the rest usually have fair to good seasons. Soils are mainly sandy, and sand dunes are common. VilIages are typically scattered across wide areas. Pearl míllet is grown tbree to four months during the monsoon season, mostly in mixtures with other crops, such as legumes and cucurbits. Animal husbandry is another important par! of tbe farmíng system. Social conditions in tbe víllages are govemed by the caste system. Even today, the caste system stilllargely determines people's social status, occupation, income, and access to education and information. Farmer's concept 01 a \"variety\"Farmers' seed management can only be evaluated if one fully understands the farmers' concept of a \"variety.\" Ims term, as understood by plant breeders, does not seem lO be fully appropriate for the farmers' pearl míllet seed system in west Rajasthan. In order to learo how farmers perceive \"varieties,\" informal interviews as well as classification and ranking exercises were carried out during workshops with farmers from the study villages. Care was taken to inelude both female and male farmers in the interviewing process. The results demonstrate tha! environrnental adaptation was the main eriterion for farmers' c!assification of pearl millet plants in westem Rajasthan. Potential uses and quality aspeets further eontributed to the farmers' method of grouping different plant types (Christinck and vom Brocke 1998).Traditionallandraces that have adapted to the environment show a high basal and nodal tillering ability, indicating toleranee to drought and low requirements for soil fertilíty. If these eharaeteristies are combined with tmn stems, narrow leaves, and thin, compact panicles with srnall grains, farmers will conclude that sueh a plant will grow under low-input eonditions (Le., in their fields) and produce grain and straw of high nutritional quality. In contrast, the characteristics of modem varieties are low basal and nodal tillering ability, tmck stems with broad leaves, and Iarge panicles with relatively large grains Iha! are mostly round in shape. From the farmers' experience, this plant type is not toleranl lo drought stress, requires higher soil fertility, and has inferior food and fodder qualities. Farmers, however, are aware that pearl millet plants showing such characterístics can produce higher yields under favorable conditions (Chrístinck and vom Brocke 1998). Farmers are therefore concemed about the composition oftheir seed stocks, i.e., wmch plant types and, thus, which properties are present. Farmers expect plant types to change over time, in reaction to environmental conditions such as soil quality and raínfall, so Iha! the seed stock generated in one year cannot be exactly reproduced the next season. They have a strong concept of continuous interactions between plant type and environmenl, as evidenced by their belief, or experience, that any pearl millet cultivar, including modern varieties, that is grown in their fie1d for sorne years will eventually become like their local cultivars.Contrary to the views of professional plant breeders, the farmers' concept of a \"variety\" is not that of a population with more or less uniform and stable plant characterístics based on its genetic background; the term \"variety\" is applied to a plant type that is evolving under or adapting lo certain environmental conditions. This concept is reflected in fue farmers' seed-management strategies.Seed management comprises all activities of a farming faroily that influence their seed stock, including introgression of modern cultivars (open-pollinated varieties or hybrids), seed selection, processing, storage, exchange, and procurement. In this paper, we refer mainly 10 seed selection and processíng, and the ways in wmch farmers deal with modem varieties frorn the market.Ways 01 se/ecting or processing seed Farmers in Rajasthan generally employ two main selection methods. The first is winnowing or grading, which entails cleaning and separating seed grains. The rate of selection can vary greatly. It may be lhat only 10% of the threshed and stored grain will be rejected (rnainly husks and broken"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2896248601.json b/main/part_2/2896248601.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b88ac4322e47f858f954ff32fd4b156d44493b53 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2896248601.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"cc47e27a9387d9f818c62f93cb43db24","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/52fd2c9a-c880-4173-bd1d-badf150acd5f/retrieve","id":"-1489491380"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"32df9ca6-40ab-4d5c-abb3-c8abb3580b73","content":"Over the last few decades, the genetic improvement of crops and livestock has improved productivity and nutrition, reduced the pressure on forests, and made farms more resistant to shocks such as disease, pests and drought. It is estimated that 30-60% of yield increases in farmers' fields can be traced back to the work of geneticists. Despite these advances, breeding programs targeting the developing world need to accelerate the rate of crop and livestock improvement in order to meet the 50-60 percent growth in demand for food expected over the 21st century with increasingly limited resources. Climate change alone will decrease crop productivity by 5 percent for every degree increase in global temperature.The Excellence in Breeding Platform will modernize breeding programs targeting the developing world for greater impact on food and nutrition security, climate change adaptation and development. Drawing from innovations in the public and private sector, the Platform will provide access to cutting-edge tools, services and best practices, application-oriented training and practical advice.There are many proven and emerging technologies from both the public and private sector that can help breeders meet this challenge. However, the pace of breeding program modernization in the developing world has been slow, with breeders lacking the resources and knowledge required to adopt new technologies. Meanwhile, too little information is shared between breeders working on different programs and commodities.The CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform provides a space for information sharing, collaborative learning and access to tools and services for partners including CGIAR research centers, national research systems, advanced research centers and the private sector. By joining their efforts, breeding programs in the developing world can achieve the economies of scale that helped revolutionize the private sector, and greatly increase the rate at which crops are improved.In the 1990s, smallholder sheep farmers in Maharashtra, India faced a crisis. The coarse wool of their sheep no longer fetched a good price in the market. Scientists from the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) began a project to help them produce more meat instead.Austalian geneticists had traced a highly prolific breed popular in the developed world to sheep imported from West Bengal in the late eighteenth century. This was confirmed when the Booroola profligacy gene, as it was known, was identified and mapped in 2001.With a cheap DNA test now available, the ACIAR team was able to quickly pass only the profligacy trait from the small West Bengali sheep into a large, meat-producing variety familiar to the farmers of Maharashtra. These sheep produced around 50 percent more lambs, showing that DNA technologies can practically benefit farmers in the developing world.In the developing world, farmers face greater challenges such as drought and rapidly-spreading new diseases. As a result, they can especially benefit from any new technologies to speed up the breeding process. Doubled haploid maize breeding is a technique that has swept through the international private sector. It is estimated that 70-80 percent of the new maize hybrids produced by major companies were developed using the technology, which can halve the time taken to develop new varieties.To put this technology to work for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa, CIMMYT partnered with the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) to set up the first doubled haploid facility in sub-Saharan Africa, with financing from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.The facility makes doubled haploid breeding available to national agricultural research systems and small-to medium-sized seed companies, and is capable of producing at least 100,000 doubled haploid lines per year, as well as being a hub for training.The Excellence in Breeding Platform aims to become the one-stop place to go for advice, tested resources and best practices for any breeding targeting the developing world.Depending on budget, the Platform will have from 10 to over 30 members by 2020, and a much wider base of users from the public and private sector.Through the communities of practice set up by the platform, a common set of standards and best practices to measure breeding program performance and impacts for farmers. A web platform will be created to evaluate new tools, share knowledge and access training between members and a broader community of breeders in the developing world. By working together, members will be able to access services such as genotyping at reduced cost, while programs with smaller budgets will capitalize on research taking place in public and private sector programs with greater resources.An online breeding toolbox will be created for 5,000-10,000 users Software tools accessed by 1,000-2,000 users Phenotyping costs reduced by 25% A common platform to share tools, information and training modules.Broker access to genotyping services at reduced cost, and support breeding programs to optimize the use of genotyping in their work.Adapt cutting-edge phenotyping approaches for routine use in breeding programs, broker access to phenotyping expertise and improve infrastructure.Harness the power of genotype, phenotype and other data by providing access to integrated bioinformatics tools and biometrics support.Only 5 percent of private sector investment in breeding goes to programs targeting the developing world, even though this is home to 45 percent of the land used to grow major food staples, 48 percent of the global population and 84 percent of all poor.It is not often feasible for the private sector to breed improved varieties for target markets in the developing world. This leaves companies dependent on varieties bred by public sector research programs or CGIAR, or continue to sell varieties that are decades old. We estimate that 200-300 local private companies may be interested in starting or improving a cultivar development program. The Excellence in Breeding Platform and CGIAR cases, it is not feasible to have a national breeding program dedicated to CGIAR mandate crops. Farmers of less important crops in these countries are reliant on the CGIAR or neighbours to deliver improved varieties.With limited resources, the environments and farming systems of the developing world are too diverse to be covered adequately by the private sector or national research systems. As the most prominent source of germplasm and breeding knowledge in the developing world, CGIAR can help reach those farmers that are being left behind. NARS and the private sector will benefit directly from increased access to improved breeds and varieties, or by being enabled to adopt the tools, training and best practices developed and provided through the Platform."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2909685316.json b/main/part_2/2909685316.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad5ceff4f9da83e2015e3545c2b9ea6a707927ce --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2909685316.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"aa3eefa2316b2059859e649652e630a5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/56a0aea0-2fb6-413b-99d8-b0ee7f11af42/retrieve","id":"2080539340"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d3e3ce47-0e00-45e1-906b-22f2e7e85c43","content":"Los pequeños agricultores andinos han trabajado durante años en condiciones difíciles, con una visión de producir, pero no de responder a las demandas del mercado. Venden en mercados donde hay poca confi anza entre los involucrados, tienen bajos rendimientos, producen para su propio consumo, vendiendo los excedentes, pero agregando poco valor a su cosecha. Carecen de información, créditos y servicios.Para aprovechar nuevas oportunidades de mercado y mejorar sus ingresos, los pequeños agricultores deben involucrarse en la innovación comercial, tecnológica e institucional. Este capítulo explica los principios del Enfoque Participativo de Cadenas Productivas (EPCP) 23 un método que construye confi anza entre los actores de la cadena; mientras hacen innovaciones juntos y crean nuevos productos con más valor agregado, que benefi cien a todos. El EPCP facilita cambios en cadenas débilmente coordinadas, promoviendo la interacción entre los actores, el aprendizaje, la confi anza mutua y la colaboración.El EPCP se aplica en tres fases (Figura 1). Después se realizan actividades pos-EPCP para consolidar los negocios y las innovaciones (Bernet et al. 2011). El EPCP debe ser aplicado por una organización que no esté vinculada a uno de los eslabones de la cadena y los facilitadores requieren de una capacitación previa.El diagnóstico cualitativo permite formar una visión general sobre la cadena productiva, identifi cando las oportunidades y los cuellos de botella. Se realiza con 20 a 40 entrevistas en profundidad, con personas de todos los eslabones de la cadena, usando una guía de pautas. Los datos son procesados en una matriz para visualizar las opiniones de cada eslabón. No es un procesamiento estadístico, sino un análisis de datos representativos que permite conocer la diversidad de expectativas, problemas y oportunidades en torno a la cadena, desde la perspectiva de los actores involucrados. Mientras levanta la encuesta, el equipo trata de despertar el interés de los actores para participar en las siguientes actividades del EPCP.La organización que implementa el EPCP toma el liderazgo en el diagnóstico (ver Figura 1). Los mismos facilitadores levantan la encuesta, que es un primer acercamiento a los actores, procesan la información y la presentan en el Primer Gran Evento, que es una reunión donde se convoca a todos los entrevistados y a otros actores de la cadena, para presentar los resultados del diagnóstico cualitativo.En este evento se forman los \"grupos temáticos\" de acuerdo con las posibles oportunidades de negocio propuestas por los actores de la cadena, realizándose una primera reunión donde se exponen las ideas generales que serán profundizadas durante la fase 2.Los facilitadores trabajan con grupos temáticos organizados con base en el diagnóstico, incluyendo actores como: procesadores, comerciantes, supermercados, restaurantes y organizaciones de investigación y desarrollo, públicas y privadas. Los grupos de interés analizan la viabilidad comercial, tecnológica y económica de las oportunidades de negocio identifi cadas en la fase 1.En esta fase, los actores, poco a poco, empiezan a asumir el liderazgo, según sus intereses en aprovechar las oportunidades del mercado. Los facilitadores dejan que estos líderes asuman su rol con un mayor compromiso. Durante esta fase, el grupo se consolida para trabajar alrededor de un interés común. Deben dejar de ser solo un conjunto de actores y constituirse en un equipo de trabajo que realiza innovaciones concretas.La fase termina con el Segundo Gran Evento, donde se presentan los resultados del análisis de cada grupo temático. Este evento sirve para motivar a los grupos y para convocar a nuevos actores que pueden enriquecer el trabajo.Los actores llevan a la práctica las ideas que analizaron durante la segunda fase, generando productos que lanzan al mercado. Esta fase distingue al EPCP, pues el resultado no son solo planes de trabajo, sino productos concretos colocados en el mercado, por actores organizados. Por ejemplo, el café tostado, molido y envasado, con un nombre de marca; la papa nativa limpia, seleccionada y enmallada; o queso mozzarella vendiéndose en las pizzerías de Oruro.En esta fase, los actores se comprometen más con las iniciativas. Los facilitadores ya solo acompañan las iniciativas de los actores. Todos los actores deben satisfacer sus intereses propios para que la acción fl uya. Por ejemplo, los agricultores venden sus cosechas a mejores precios, los procesadores tienen materia prima de calidad, los comerciantes venden nuevos productos atractivos y los consumidores disfrutan de mejores productos.El EPCP termina con el Gran Evento Final donde se presentan las innovaciones que han sido desarrolladas por los grupos temáticos. En este evento participan las instituciones locales y las empresas involucradas en la cadena, políticos del sector y la prensa. El EPCP estimula diferentes tipos de innovaciones (alcances) entre actores de la cadena:Innovación comercial: nuevos productos y mejor acceso al mercado y a los consumidores. Puede ser a través de nuevas presentaciones como: productos con mejores envases y etiquetas, nuevos nichos de mercado o nuevos canales de distribución y estrategias de mercadeo que satisfacen las necesidades de los clientes.Innovación tecnológica: cambios en la producción, respondiendo a las nuevas oportunidades de negocio, en cualquier eslabón de la cadena (en el campo, la fábrica o el almacén). Frecuentemente son cambios agrícolas, incluyendo mejores técnicas de cultivo o poscosecha, y mejor semilla o variedades más demandadas en el mercado.Innovación institucional: no se refi ere a las organizaciones públicas o privadas, sino a nuevas reglas del juego o relaciones entre los actores de la cadena. Incluye nuevas normas de calidad y redes o plataformas que consolidan las otras innovaciones.El EPCP tiene el siguiente protocolo para asegurar la implementación apropiada.Fase 1: diagnóstico cualitativo de la cadena productiva 2 a 4 meses 1. Mapeo de actores de la cadena productiva.Identifi car a los actores de la cadena. 2. Diagnóstico cualitativo de la cadena productiva. Identifi car oportunidades e ideas de negocios. 3. Primer Gran Evento.Generar interés en los actores, compartiendo los resultados del mapeo y del diagnóstico cualitativo.Formar grupos de trabajo en torno a las ideas de negocios.Fase 2: análisis de las oportunidades de negocios 3 a 5 meses 4. Reuniones periódicas, más o menos cada 15 días. Desarrollar las ideas en planes de negocios.Identifi car e incluir a otros actores. Interactuar y desarrollar confi anza entre los a c t o r e s . 5. Segundo Gran Evento.Presentar los planes de negocios a una audiencia de actores de la cadena. Incorporar nuevos actores.Fase 3: poner en práctica las innovaciones conjuntas 4 a 6 meses 6. Reuniones periódicas cada 15 días Los grupos temáticos ejecutan los planes de aproximadamente.negocios. Los actores interactúan y colaboran. 7. Tercer Gran Evento.Involucrar a la prensa y líderes de opinión para dar una cobertura amplia a los nuevos negocios y otros productos.indefi nido 8. Apoyo y asesoramiento a pedido. Asegurar la sostenibilidad de las innovaciones.3 a 5 meses 4. Reuniones periódicas, más o menos cada 15 días. Desarrollar las ideas en planes de negocios.Identifi car e incluir a otros actores. Interactuar y desarrollar confi anza entre los a c tores. 5. Segundo Gran Evento.Presentar los planes de negocios a una a u diencia de actores de la cadena. Incorporar nuevos actores.Figura 2. Estructura para la capacitación en el EPCP Se publicó una estrategia de capacitación en el EPCP para los facilitadores (Antezana et al. 2008), escrita y aplicada principalmente por Papa Andina y sus socios en Bolivia (Fundación Proinpa), Perú (Incopa) y Ecuador (INIAP-PN-RT). La capacitación tiene cuatro talleres que estructuran el aprendizaje en tres fases (Figura 2).El EPCP logra su impacto vinculando los productos (actividades de los facilitadores) con los alcances (cambios en conocimientos, actitudes, prácticas entre los actores) y los impactos (cambios en el bienestar de los agricultores pobres) (Figura 3). La relación entre los productos, los alcances e impactos se llama las \"vías de impacto. \" Antes de aplicar el EPCP, los facilitadores describen explícitamente las vías de impacto que esperan, para planifi car la línea de base, el monitoreo y las encuestas fi nales (evaluación).El EPCP debe lograr los siguientes productos:1. El mapeo de actores.2. Un diagnóstico cualitativo de la cadena productiva.3. Planes de trabajo, incluyendo ideas de negocio, de los grupos temáticos.4. Eventos y reuniones con actores de la cadena en relativa igualdad.5. Autoridades políticas informadas sobre la importancia de la cadena productiva.En las reuniones, los actores deben mejorar su conocimiento mutuo, para crear ideas y planes de negocios. Para concretar estos planes, el EPCP busca aumentar la confi anza entre actores. No se puede desarrollar un negocio nuevo sin esa confi anza (que va creciendo durante y después del EPCP). Los planes de negocios requieren que los actores de la cadena innoven (ver el círculo al medio de la Figura 3), y que logren los siguientes alcances:1. Establecen nuevos canales de comunicación.2. Instituyen espacios de consenso (plataformas) con participación de los pequeños agricultores.3. Manejan información más completa del mercado, permitiendo por ejemplo, que los transformadores sepan cómo se produce su materia prima, y los productores conozcan la demanda de los consumidores.4. Emprenden acciones conjuntas. 5. Pequeños agricultores mejor organizados con una red comercial ampliada en respuesta a la demandas de la cadena y a las nuevas oportunidades de mercado.El EPCP crea servicios de apoyo para las demandas de la cadena y de los pequeños agricultores, mientras informa a las autoridades políticas y promueve un contexto político favorable. Las innovaciones con nuevas oportunidades de mercado llevan a precios más altos y estables, e incrementos en los ingresos de los pequeños agricultores, para mejorar sus medios de vida.En la siguiente sección se presentan cinco casos de aplicación del EPCP, analizando los productos, alcances e impacto logrados."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2925393415.json b/main/part_2/2925393415.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d282ada075017b46af2efd3e3d0853dcf76db49 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2925393415.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"74a32e4a25e507c87b23ef9c82326c07","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4aecccdf-7338-425b-9605-e90f87a79d74/retrieve","id":"383632099"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d540960d-a5b5-4ec2-b1b5-e71211bd3bae","content":"Fiche TechniqueLa collecte des eaux de pluie se pratique depuis des millénaires notamment dans les régions arides et semi-arides. Les eaux de pluies sont plus particulièrement utilisées pour l'irrigation des cultures et pour différents usages domestiques tels que la lessive, par exemple, mais elles peuvent aussi servir à la consommation humaine ou animale.Le facteur climatique a une grande incidence sur la collecte des eaux de pluies : on assiste actuellement à un réchauffement général du climat de la planète et à des pluies plus rares et souvent très violentes, un phénomène encore accentué par la disparition du couvert végétal. Dans certains pays arides ou semi-arides, les pluies qui tombent durant la saison des pluies (généralement quatre mois, de juillet à octobre) ne suffisent plus à alimenter les nappes phréatiques et les puits. Lorsque la saison sèche arrive, les réserves sont donc vite épuisées.Les eaux de pluies peuvent être conservées dans des réservoirs individuels et des citernes de stockage alimentées par des surfaces de captage (impluviums) mais il ne faut pas oublier que la façon la plus courante de conserver l'eau de pluie, c'est dans le sol ! En effet collecter les eaux de pluies ne veut pas seulement dire capter l'eau de pluie mais également encourager une plus grande infiltration de l'eau de pluie et donc la conserver dans le sol en empêchant le ruissellement et l'érosion. La conservation du couvert végétal est donc particulièrement importante car lorsqu'il pleut sur des terres recouvertes de végétation, le ruissellement est ralenti. Ce ralentissement se fait de la façon suivante: les gouttes \"éclatent\" sur les feuilles des arbres ou sur l'herbe au sol et leur force destructrice est donc ralentie lorsqu'elles touchent la terre proprement dite. Une partie de cette eau s'infiltre, mouille le sol en profondeur et s'y accumule pour alimenter la nappe phréatique tandis qu'une autre partie de l'eau coule mais est freinée par la végétation, alimentant ainsi les marigots et les bas-fonds. A leur tour le renouvellement de la nappe phréatique et le gonflement des marigots et des bas-fonds vont aller remplir les puits construits dans les environs. Par contre, sur les terrains sans couvert végétal, les gouttes arrivent très vite et violemment sur le sol, sans être freinées : elles arrachent de la terre, cassent les mottes, bouchent les fentes du sol. L'eau tasse le sol (phénomène de compactage), ne s'infiltre pas et ruisselle, emportant toute la bonne terre arrachée. De plus, en s'écoulant, l'eau prend de la force, creuse des ravines et peut même causer des effondrements de terrain dans certains cas. Enfin si le sol n'est pas imprégné en profondeur, les puits fournissent un peu d'eau en saison des pluies mais plus rien en saison sèche.Il existe de nombreux systèmes de collecte des eaux de pluie mais on peut les regrouper en deux catégories: ceux d'abord qui sont mis en place au niveau individuel ou au niveau de l'exploitation agricole comme par exemple la collecte de l'eau de toiture au niveau domestique ou les techniques de conservation de l'eau de pluie au niveau de chaque plante comme les « zais » et les demi-lunes, et puis ceux qui sont exécutés sur une plus grande échelle comme les aménagements en courbe de niveau ou bien les micro-barrages et retenues villageoises qui sont destinés à retenir les eaux de ruissellement non plus au niveau individuel mais plutôt au niveau de toute une communauté. Dans certains cas les autorités ou des acteurs extérieurs doivent intervenir dans le financement de ces ouvrages, vu les frais importants qui doivent être engagés.Cette série d'émissions vous propose des interviews avec des spécialistes de la collecte des eaux de pluies et également avec des experts de la conservation des sols. Vous y trouverez donc des renseignements sur les impluviums, sur l'importance de la matière organique pour permettre une meilleure infiltration de l'eau dans le sol, sur les différentes techniques recommandées pour favoriser cette infiltration et sur les différents types de micro-barrages, de réservoirs et de retenues villageoises.Un impluvium est un système de captage des eaux de pluie construit pour stocker et fournir de l'eau pendant les périodes de pénurie. Il se compose de quatre parties essentielles :• une aire de captage : cela peut être la toiture d'une maison ou d'un bâtiment ou une aire de collecte des eaux de pluie spécialement aménagée ; • une ou plusieurs gouttières en bambou, en tôle galvanisée ou en PVC : elles servent à collecter les eaux provenant de la toiture et à les canaliser vers les citernes de stockage ; • une citerne hors sol : elle reçoit les eaux provenant des gouttières par l'intermédiaire d'une conduite et les stocke pendant l'intervalle compris entre deux saisons de pluie ou plus ; • un dispositif de déviation des premières pluies : grâce à ce système, les premières pluies qui drainent l'insalubrité accumulée sur la surface de captage sont éliminées et ne sont pas admises dans la citerne. A ces quatre éléments essentiels sont associés un filtre qui permet la rétention de certains débris végétaux et animaux avant leur déversement dans la citerne, un robinet qui sert à l'approvisionnement et un tuyau de vidange des eaux après le lavage de la citerne.Les impluviums présentent de nombreux avantages :• Ils évitent d'avoir à transporter l'eau depuis une source éloignée : ils offrent un approvisionnement sur les lieux mêmes de la consommation ! • La qualité de l'eau est généralement supérieure à celle de certains ruisseaux ou marigots. • Ils sont peu coûteux à l'emploi : il n'y a pratiquement aucune pièce mobile, ni aucune énergie requise. • L'eau de pluie est douce et est donc bonne pour la consommation et le lavage des vêtements. • Les impluviums garantissent l'indépendance de l'approvisionnement en eau puisque les ménages l'utilisant ne sont pas tributaires des ressources de la communauté ou des aménagements collectifs.• Il sont simples à construire: la construction des citernes est facile et l'on peut former localement des ouvriers pour les construire, ce qui peut permettre de réduire les coûts.De plus la technologie en est souple : on peut construire les systèmes en les adaptant à pratiquement n'importe quel besoin.• Ils réduisent le ruissellement et donc les inondations en zone habitée.A côté de ces nombreux avantages, le système présente quelques inconvénients :• Le coût initial de construction est relativement élevé. En revanche, une fois l'eau stockée dans les citernes, le maintien de sa qualité exige une grande rigueur dans l'entretien de l'ouvrage. Cet entretien commence dès la collecte des eaux de pluies et se poursuit jusqu'à la fin de l'utilisation de l'eau stockée. Il consiste essentiellement à :• dévier les premières pluies : l'eau de pluie n'est admise dans la citerne (réservoir) que lorsque la toiture (surface de captage) est jugée suffisamment propre. La même précaution est prise lorsque les pluies s'interrompent pour plus d'une semaine. Le dispositif de déviation des premières pluies doit être facilement manipulable. • nettoyer les gouttières et la citerne au début de la saison pluvieuse.• procéder à la chloration (chlore ou eau de javel) de l'eau stockée avant le début de la consommation pour parer à toute contamination éventuelle. Le compostage est une opération qui consiste à faire fermenter, dans des conditions contrôlées, des déchets organiques en présence de l'oxygène de l'air. Le compost est donc de la matière organique décomposée : feuilles mortes, déchets végétaux de table, gazon coupé, chaumes de maïs, etc. Le fumier est un mélange solide de déjections d'animaux d'élevage et de litière (paille, copeaux, etc.) Le compost et le fumier facilitent l'infiltration de l'eau dans le sol parce que la matière organique se colle aux particules de terre en formant des agrégats qui aèrent le sol et permettent donc la pénétration de l'air et de l'eau. Qui plus est, les matières organiques ellesmêmes retiennent l'eau et les éléments nutritifs. En pratique, un mélange de compost et de sable ajouté aux sols trop compacts permet de les aérer et de les alléger, tandis que l'ajout de compost et d'une terre plus lourde aux sols sablonneux favorise une meilleure rétention de l'humidité et des minéraux.Le paillis (ou mulch) est une couche de matériau protecteur posée sur le sol, destinée à empêcher la terre de se dessécher en ralentissant l'évaporation de l'eau et en maintenant l'humidité dans le sol. Grace au paillis l'eau de pluie ruisselle moins et s'infiltre davantage dans le sol.On désigne par cordons pierreux des dispositifs constitués de blocs de moellons assemblés par séries de 1, 2, 3 ou plusieurs à la fois. C'est un \" chapelet \" de cailloux moyens disposés le long d'une courbe de niveau, sur des terrains à pente faible ou moyenne, qui servent à contrôler le ruissellement de l'eau de pluie. Ils favorisent la sédimentation et l'infiltration de l'eau et permettent d'uniformiser la répartition de l'eau dans la parcelle. Les diguettes utilisent sensiblement le même procédé sauf qu'elles sont construites en terre au lieu de pierre.Pour bien tirer parti de ces deux techniques il faut avoir une notion de la configuration du bassin versant afin de déterminer la pente générale et les différentes lignes de partage des eaux de ruissellement, et savoir déterminer les lignes des courbes de niveau : le bassin versant peut se définir comme une surface ruisselante dont les contours sont délimités par les points de plus haute altitude. L'ensemble des points culminants reliés les uns aux autres de façon imaginaire constitue la ligne de partage des eaux. Une courbe de niveau est donc une ligne imaginaire qui relie tous les points de même altitude dans une aire géographique donnée.Les courbes de niveau peuvent se déterminer à l'aide d'un niveau à eau, d'un triangle à sol ou par un levé topographique. Le traçage se fait alors à l'aide d'une daba ou d'une pioche. Il est conseillé d'utiliser un écartement entre les cordons compris entre 30 et 47 mètres. En moyenne, trois voyages de camions de moellons sont nécessaires pour aménager un hectare. Une fois les courbes matérialisées, il faut ouvrir un sillon d'ancrage de 10 à 15 cm de profondeur et de 15 à 20 cm de largeur, et y disposer une ligne de grosses pierres. Il convient de renforcer cette ligne en aval avec une autre ligne de petites pierres et de rabattre la terre du sillon pour consolider l'assise du cordon pierreux. Il faut ensuite procéder à la plantation d'espèces herbacées ou arbustives (Andropogon, Vetiver, Acacia nilotica, Ziziphus mauritiana etc…). L'étape suivante consiste à effectuer un apport de fumier ou de compost bien décomposé. Il faut toujours travailler le sol parallèlement aux courbes de niveau de manière à ralentir le ruissellement dans le champ. L'entretien des cordons par le remplacement des pierres déplacées est essentiel à l'efficacité de la technique. (« Utiliser le relief pour faciliter l'infiltration. ») Le succès de ces techniques dépend de plusieurs facteurs :• Une pluviométrie d'au moins 300 à 400 mm par an. Les aménagements de collecte des eaux de pluie pouvant exiger des apports importants et suivis de main d'oeuvre et de ressources, l'intégration de cette technologie dans un programme plus global de développement communautaire est fortement encouragée. Si par exemple les eaux de pluie collectées sont destinées à l'irrigation de cultures à fort rapport économique, il pourrait être utile d'associer à cette initiative un programme de commercialisation permettant de garantir aux agriculteurs qu'ils puissent vendre leur production à un prix satisfaisant. A l'inverse, un aménagement de collecte des eaux de pluie peut être utilisé pour irriguer des cultures fourragères et alimenter toute l'année des troupeaux plus importants en pâturage et eau d'abreuvement. Il faudra alors compléter un tel aménagement par des systèmes d'exploitation des effectifs augmentés d'animaux d'élevage, tels que le développement de produits d'élevage à valeur ajoutée, ou en prévoyant l'accès à un marché fiable et profitable. La collecte des eaux de pluie peut aussi servir à compléter les mesures sanitaires pour faire face, par exemple, aux taux élevés de cas de diarrhée chez les enfants.La participation communautaire est également importante non seulement pour la construction des structures de collecte des eaux de pluie, mais aussi pour leur entretien ultérieur. En effet, pour rester efficaces, la plupart de ces structures doivent être régulièrement entretenues. Il faut débourber les bassins et cuvettes, réparer les bourrelets, recreuser les fossés au besoin, et des mesures d'entretien sont généralement nécessaires chaque année. Si les utilisateurs de la technologie ne participent pas à la prise de décision dès le début et n'ont investi ni leur temps ni leurs ressources dans sa mise en oeuvre, ils risquent de ne pas s'être «approprié» le système. Dans ce cas ils n'assureront probablement pas son entretien et il deviendra rapidement inutilisable.Les interviews de cette série donnent de nombreux renseignements pratiques sur les techniques de collecte des eaux de pluie et leur utilité pour les ménages, en en mettant en évidence les avantages et inconvénients. Il serait judicieux de compléter ces interviews avec des informations plus spécifiques au contexte local, surtout en matière de conservation et d'infiltration de l'eau de pluie dans le sol puisque les paysans trouvent souvent des solutions adaptées à leurs propres conditions. En ce qui concerne la collecte des eaux de pluie à usage domestique, un direct au téléphone pourrait permettre de constater si les usagers connaissent les nouvelles technologies, quelles sont les difficultés qu'ils rencontrent et surtout si les coûts initiaux des installations les dissuadent de les essayer.Cette interview avec l'un des spécialistes africains de la collecte de l'eau de pluie les plus connus révèle que la crise de l'eau dans les pays du sud est encore plus pressante qu'on ne l'affirme généralement. L'eau douce dont les êtres humains ont besoin pour leurs besoins de consommation n'est pas accessible facilement puisqu'elle se trouve principalement dans les nappes souterraines et les fleuves. De plus les politiques de développement ne mettent pas le développement du secteur de l'eau au premier plan de leurs priorités. Or la plupart des investissements nécessaires pour apporter l'eau aux populations ne sont pas à la portée des pays du sud en général et il leur faut aller chercher ces moyens auprès de partenaires financiers dont c'est rarement la priorité. Les avantages de la collecte des eaux de pluie sont donc très nombreux : la disponibilité sur place, des économies certaines sur le plan financier, l'amélioration de l'hygiène et de la santé et la prévention des inondations au niveau des ménages.Les deux interviews traitant des impluviums se complètent puisqu'en faisant intervenir chacune un spécialiste différent, elles passent en revue dans le détail les avantages et inconvénients des impluviums mais également les spécificités des citernes de stockage, dispositif principal de l'impluvium. Les deux interviews font également état des précautions indispensables à prendre pour éviter toute contamination de l'eau stockée, telle la déviation des premières pluies qui se chargent des impuretés collectées sur les toits pendant la saison sèche. Pourquoi collecter l'eau de pluie 4'37 Le monde connaît une crise de l'eau ou du moins de disponibilité de l'eau. L'eau de pluie offre donc de gros avantages à faible coût.Les impluviums sont des dispositifs simples de collecte des eaux de toiture à usage domestique qui présentent de nombreux avantages.Le bon fonctionnement du dispositif de l'impluvium dépend de la qualité et du respect des spécificités techniques de la citerne de stockage.4'05 La pluie est naturellement acide et a souvent un goût désagréable. Pourtant elle peut être bue sans effet nuisible pour la santé. Est-ce à dire qu'elle est potable ?6'31 La plantation d'arbres et l'ajout de compost et de fumier par la technique des zais et des demi-lunes favorisent l'infiltration de l'eau de pluie. 4'58 Dans les endroits non cultivés comme les routes et les chemins, l'eau de pluie qui ruisselle peut être collectée et servir à l'irrigation. Alors y a-t-il des dispositions à prendre pour minimiser ces inconvénients-là ?Oui, c'est la sensibilisation, la formation … ou bien l'éducation à l'hygiène et à l'environnement au niveau de la santé. Lors de la sensibilisation il est important de souligner les facteurs d'entretien : les premières pluies doivent être déviées. Ensuite l'entretien même de la citerne : il doit se faire de façon annuelle. Nous utilisons souvent l'eau de javel ou l'eau de chlore pour essayer de traiter cette eau, que nous mettons à la disposition des communautés, et souvent nous avons des relais. Les relais peuvent être des agents d'hygiène ou bien également des relais communautaires qui ont été formés et qui savent faire le dosage de l'eau de javel ou bien du chlore pour la désinfection de cette eau. Comme vous le savez, le Mali est un pays sahélien où il y a la sécheresse endémique mais d'autre part les sols sont très vulnérables et les sols sont pauvres en matière organique ; et quand il pleut, ce n'est pas rare de voir qu'il y a un grand ruissellement qui se produit, qui entraîne l'érosion qui décape la couche fertile de la terre ; donc le thème de l'infiltration de l'eau est un thème particulièrement important. Ça peut se faire par l'ajout de matière organique. Et différentes sources de matière organique existent : il y a d'abord les ordures ménagères qui ont une fonction très importante pour la fourniture de matière organique dégradable et il y a le fumier et ça c'est particulièrement important parce que partout au Mali, les gens font de l'élevage. Ils font de l'agriculture et de l'élevage en même temps. Bon il y a aussi le paillage à partir des résidus de culture qui apporte aussi de la matière organique hein … et il y a la plantation d'arbres. Vous connaissez le fameux arbre qu'on appelle le « Balanzan » c'est-à-dire l'Acacia Albida, certains l'appellent aussi « Faidherbia Albida », qui ne produit pas de feuilles en saison des pluies mais qui produit des feuilles en saison sèche et ces feuilles-là tombent et forment une litière. Il y a aussi les plantes de couverture c'est-à-dire qu'au lieu de laisser le sol nu pendant la saison sèche, on peut mettre des plantes de couverture telles que le Mucuna et la Dolique qui couvrent le sol, donnent aussi des feuilles mortes et constituent de la matière organique. Nous avons aussi des techniques disons de collecte de l'eau telles que le « zai » et les demi-lunes qui constituent tous des méthodes pour collecter de l'eau et tirer le maximum de profit de l'eau qui tombe.Pour être un peu plus précis, est-ce que vous pouvez développer un peu ces techniques-là : le « zai », comment ça se fait concrètement, la méthode de la demi-lune, comment ça se fait concrètement, est-ce que vous pouvez donner quelques indications pour quelqu'un qui voudrait les reproduire ?Bon le zai… bon c'est une technique locale puisque sur les terres qui sont très compactées et sur lesquelles l'eau, quand elle tombe, ruisselle, les agriculteurs font des trous circulaires à peu près de 15 à 20 centimètres de diamètre et à peu près 15 à 30 centimètres de profondeur ; ils mettent soit de l'herbe séchée ou bien même du fumier là-dedans. Donc ils font ça en saison des pluies et avec les premières pluies qui tombent, l'eau s'entasse dans ces trous et avec la matière organique qui est là, après une ou deux semaines, quand ils sèment, ça fait vraiment un micro-environnement et vous voyez, les plantes poussent… et nous avons fait des études là-dessus on a vu que le zai permet d'augmenter souvent la production de 100 à 150%. Donc ça permet de récupérer des terres dégradées qu'on ne peut plus cultiver. Les zais, ça nécessite beaucoup de travail parce que c'est du travail manuel et il y a des tentatives pour mécaniser le système des zais. Bon pour les demi-lunes, comme leur nom l'indique, on creuse un trou mais qui n'est pas complètement fermé et qui a la forme d'un croissant de lune. On le fait un peu en aval de la pente donc quand l'eau ruisselle, elle reste là-dedans. On peut le faire en quinconce, c'est-à-dire de façon éparpillée et ça aussi ça permet de faire un micro-climat, un micro-environnement qui améliore la quantité d'eau disponible et qui permet vraiment à la plante de pousser un peu plus vite et de souffrir moins des périodes de sécheresse…hein … Bon, la technique du paillage, ca consiste, disons, soit des feuilles d'arbre soit de l'herbe séchée, on récupère ça ou bien les résidus de récoltes tels que les cornes de maïs, on les met en tas à la surface du sol et ça crée aussi un micro-environnement… hein … Quand il pleut vous allez trouver qu'en dessous des chaumes de maïs ou bien de la paille qu'on a mis comme mulch, c'est humide ; souvent les termites aussi vont utiliser une partie de ça et ils font des galeries et vous trouvez aussi des vers là-dedans et vous voyez que l'eau s'infiltre dans les galeries que les termites produisent et cela permet aussi de favoriser l'infiltration de l'eau. Parce que vous savez que dans les zones sahéliennes, il y a des algues qui peuvent se développer à la surface du sol et qui forment des croûtes et ces croûtes-là sont difficiles à casser. Les micro-barrages Alors quelles sont les difficultés que vous avez pu rencontrer dans la réalisation de tels ouvrages ?En tous cas ces ouvrages sont coûteux et les paysans, seuls, ne peuvent pas s'y atteler. C'est pourquoi on leur demande de se réunir en coopératives. Quand ils se réunissent en coopératives, ils deviennent solvables. Ils peuvent prendre leur argent pour s'organiser, prendre des spécialistes pour faire la conception et réaliser les aménagements pour eux.On peut avoir une idée du coût ?Pour un aménagement avec une retenue d'eau, le coût à l'hectare peut aller jusqu'à 5 millions à l'hectare. Maintenant pour les « P.auf. » c'est-à-dire les « prises au fil de l'eau » : on met un ouvrage dans le lit de la rivière et lorsqu'il y a une pluie, ils barrent au niveau de cet ouvrage et l'eau remonte à l'amont, à l'amont de l'ouvrage, ce qui permet d'alimenter les différents casiers. Ce genre d'ouvrages, ça c'est un petit ouvrage, ce genre d'ouvrages, ça peut aller à 500 000 ou à 800 000 à l'hectare. Ça c'est un ouvrage qui est adapté aux paysans qui n'ont pas les moyens. Quand il pleut, ils arrivent à recueillir l'eau et puis à l'utiliser directement. Mais l'inconvénient de cet ouvrage c'est lorsqu'il n'y a pas de pluies : ils ne peuvent pas utiliser cet ouvrage c'est-à-dire que si la rivière n'est pas permanente et qu'il n'y a pas de pluies, ils ne peuvent pas l'utiliser.Quels sont les matériaux à utiliser pour la réalisation de tels ouvrages ?Pour réaliser un barrage, on utilise la terre locale c'est-à-dire les gravillons latéritiques, ce qu'on appelle la terre rouge, pour faire la digue. Ce sont les engins qui jouent beaucoup dans la réalisation d'un barrage, pour le compactage de la digue ; ensuite pour la protection, pour éviter l'érosion, on utilise en amont des pierres, c'est-à-dire les graviers et en aval on plante du gazon sur la digue. Maintenant pour la réalisation de la prise, c'est du béton, du béton armé. Les canaux sont réalisés en terre et puis on fait le revêtement en béton ou bien quelquefois il reste en terre."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2928163903.json b/main/part_2/2928163903.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..354ec476ab5f97eb529bdaade50c0c7eef70bf22 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2928163903.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"01bcd175c0fb684fd6e904e0f32b6a39","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b87108f7-ec25-480c-b7ec-4789c03f922d/retrieve","id":"-1095018108"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"317a38ee-693d-474b-ba43-91d1968a89be","content":"new variety with unique genetic content. From this point onward, there is no further genetic change and segregation among genes. Based on this understanding, Grüneberg et al. (2007) designed an \"Accelerated Breeding Scheme\" (ABS) for sweetpotato (Fig. 2) with the principle to do as much as possible concurrently, what is done in Figure 1 sequentially in several steps over several years. Visual agronomic evaluation is also carried out to identify the worthy genotypes in early breeding stages (seedling nurseries and observation trials (OTs)). The ABS for sweetpotato requires 1 year for crossings and multiplication of planting material (Fig. 2). In the second year, all genotypes developed from seeds that have been cloned in year 1 are planted concurrently in two to four distinct environments as observational trials (OT) in small plots (3 plants per row) without replica-2014 AUG Getting Sweetpotato Varieties to Farmers Faster: The Accelerated Breeding Scheme (ABS)A member of the CGIAR ConsortiumThe most important constraints to sweetpotato production in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are shortage of high quality planting material and lack of improved OFSP varieties. The approach conventional breeding programs have followed for decades start with population development (crossings and generation of genetic variation through production of botanical seed) and end with selection of the \"best\" individuals in the genetic variation / breeding population and variety release. This conventional breeding scheme as illustrated in Fig. 1 takes 7 to 8 years. Given our findings and the pressure to make a difference in farmer's lives faster, this \"conventional\" breeding scheme is no longer adequate. After evaluating the OTs, the best selections are entered into a series of trials across environments [multi-locational trials (MTs)] as before in the conventional breeding scheme to be evaluated again for storage root yield, upper biomass yields and storage root quality in years 3 and 4. In year 4, these are conducted concurrently with on-farm trials (OFs). Moreover traits are aggregated into an index. This enables the release of varieties in second season of year 4. ABS for sweetpotato has the potential to be applied to other clonally propagated crops. Consensus exists in the sweetpotato community of practice (CoP) that ABS is indeed a powerful tool to generate varieties fast and enhance breeding efficiency. The latter appears to be due to its ability to capture the following traits early in the breeding cycle: yield stability, harvest index stability and storage root initiation stability as well as quality attributes such as dry matter, b-carotene and sugar content. However, ABS is management intensive, as more sites are managed concurrently. Thus, very resource constrained breeding programs may not be able to adopt it.Since 2005, two recurrent selection cycles have been conducted using ABS, with the release of 14 drought tolerant varieties in 2011 by breeding tracing back to true seed and one additional variety (Gloria) tracing back to farmer material (Gloria was not bred). More varieties are in the pipeline for release in 2014 and 2015. In the first cycle, four distinct sites have been used (Fig 3), with their unique characteristics described in Table 1. Four sites in Mozambique were classified as unique in terms of their agro-ecological characteristics (Table 1). From August 2005 to December 2009, a crossing block was established, several trials (118), from seedlings (polycross and controlled cross) using ABS gave rise to 59 different AYTs planted at Umbelúzi, Chókwè, Angónia, and Gurué involving the evaluation of a total of 139,508 genotypes (Table 2).From the selection process carried out, 64 clones from 59 AYT emerged for testing in series of variety trials [multi-location (MTs)] and on-farm trials (OFs) in four agricultural research stations and their surrounding areas, respectively.For MTs, the experimental design was randomized completed block design (RCBD) with four replications; net plots had one row with 23 plants. The attributes measured were: Root Yield, Dry Matter, and Beta-carotene in mg/100g (RHS Color Chart), Taste (1-5 Likert scale; 5 excellent taste) virus and weevil damage and vine vigour (1-10 scale; score of 10 being most vigorous).To make sure that the attributes used in the process of selection account for the majority of the variance in the data set, a principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted. The 23 clones remaining after the elimination procedure and index selection were submitted to GXE analysis using AMMI models, to determine the degree of stability across the 4 sites.Six clones showed tendency to be stable over the all the environments (Fig. 4). Another 9 were selected for specific adaptation. In Figure 4 red squares represent environments and blue triangles represent clones for variety release. Clones in the center and to the right of the center line (PC 1 = 0) are high yielding (response in t/ha) stable clones over all environments, whereas those clones close to at least one environment are specific adapted clones to the environment near to the clone(s). For example, 42g and 30g are clones Table 5: Summary of the most important results from the first generation conventional breeding release (G1), the first generation ABS (G2), the second generation ABS (G3).with specific adaptation to the environment Angonia. Table 3 presents the overall results of the selected clones from the first generation (G2).In 2011, the third generation (G3) was initiated, and up to 2014, about 30,836 clones were evaluated under ABS. Table 4 presents the list of the selection trials established during 2011-14 selection cycle. As a result, 76 clones with potential to be released were selected.In 2013/14, these 76 potential varieties are under 4 multi-locational and 88 on-farm trials that will lead to varietal release in late 2014 and another 56 clones are destined for multi-location trials in 2015.A comparison of the most important characteristics of the clones from the first generation (G1) conventional breeding released in 2000, the first generation ABS (G2), and the second generation ABS (G3) is presented in Table 5. Max.Iron (Fe) (mg/100 g DW) Zinc (Zn) (mg/100 g DW)Max.Min. In conclusion, the ABS clearly reduces the time needed from crossing to variety release and it is efficient. Further research to determine the magnitude of the efficiency of this breeding scheme is warranted. The likelihood is high that it will lead to significantly faster breeding progress in sweetpotato as well as other clonally propagated crops, provided it becomes known and adopted by more breeding programs. Finally, we want to note that ABS is enhancing the efficiency of selection within a given population. Note that ABS is not targeting directly at more elevated population means -see heterosis exploiting breeding schemes (HEBS). ABS and HEBS together appear to us currently the best tools offered by selection theory to enhance in this and the next decade to applied breeding of clonally propagated crops."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2929686472.json b/main/part_2/2929686472.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e6e24d54dba8a2458da84662f845212eb486473 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2929686472.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5ec3c37c857bc755e2c76e05eaf18df8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/63f12966-dd6f-4ced-bdf0-f56726c1406d/retrieve","id":"-392245326"},"keywords":["vitamin A, hidden hunger, malnutrition, fortification, diet diversification ANOVA, Analysis of Variance","IREC, Internal Research Ethics Committee","PVA, Provitamin A","RAE, Retinol Activity Equivalent","SAMRC, South African Medical Research Council","SD, Standard Deviation","USD, United States Dollars"],"sieverID":"f306cf40-5343-4b55-a105-796ef549a6d3","content":"Background: Evidence of the effectiveness of biofortified maize with higher provitamin A (PVA) to address vitamin A deficiency in rural Africa remains scant. Objectives: This study projects the impact of adopting PVA maize for a diversity of households in an area typical of rural Zimbabwe and models the cost and composition of diets adequate in vitamin A. Methods: Household-level weighed food records were generated from 30 rural households during a week in April and November 2021. Weekly household intakes were calculated, as well as indicative costs of diets using data from market surveys. The impact of PVA maize adoption was modeled assuming all maize products contained observed vitamin A concentrations. The composition and cost of the least expensive indicative diets adequate in vitamin A were calculated using linear programming. Results: Very few households would reach adequate intake of vitamin A with the consumption of PVA maize. However, from a current situation of 33%, 50%-70% of households were projected to reach 50% of their requirements (the target of PVA), even with the modest vitamin A concentrations achieved on-farm (mean of 28.3 μg RAE per 100 g). This proportion would increase if higher concentrations recorded on-station were achieved. The estimated daily costs of current diets (mean AE standard deviation) were USD 1.43 AE 0.59 in the wet season and USD 0.96 AE 0.40 in the dry season. By comparison, optimization models suggest that diets adequate in vitamin A could be achieved at daily costs of USD 0.97 and USD 0.79 in the wet and dry seasons, respectively. Conclusions: The adoption of PVA maize would bring a substantial improvement in vitamin A intake in rural Zimbabwe but should be combined with other interventions (e.g., diet diversification) to fully address vitamin A deficiency.The prevalence of vitamin A deficiency is high in low-and low to middle-income countries [1,2], including (rural) Zimbabwe and neighboring countries [3][4][5]. It can be addressed through dietary diversification, fortification of industrially processed food (such as cooking oil or sugar), biofortification, and/or supplementation (high dose provided in e.g., oral liquid form) [6][7][8][9]. The coverage of vitamin A supplementation programs for children aged 6-59 mo in Zimbabwe was ~40% in recent years but varies widely across years, including a decline during 2020 and 2021, most likely due to COVID-19 [10]. Vitamin A supplementation programs are generally costly and difficult to maintain, and supplementation access varies by sub-population, typically compounding other health and food system inequities (such as vaccination access), including in Zimbabwe [11]. In this context and recognizing that low-income households may not be in a capacity to afford a diverse diet [12], conventional breeding of maize for higher provitamin A concentration-referred to as PVA maize in the rest of the paper-has been presented as having good potential to address low vitamin A intake in rural Africa [13].A breeding target of 15 ppm was set to provide 50% of the estimated average requirement for vitamin A [14]. To date, a total of 76 PVA enhanced varieties have been commercialized in Africa [15]. Under on-station conditions, the PVA concentration achieved through breeding has varied from 7.5 to 15 ppm [16] (against a concentration of non-PVA elite maize 2 ppm [17]). For illustration, consumption of 250 g/d of maize flour with PVA concentration of 10 ppm would deliver 2.5 mg PVA, equivalent to 208 μg Retinol Activity Equivalent (RAE). This compares with an average adult female requirement of 490 μg RAE [18].Although the ability to increase PVA content of maize through genetic improvement has been demonstrated, evidence of the effectiveness of maize biofortification programs on vitamin A status remains scant. Consumption of PVA maize improved children's vitamin A status, serum retinol concentrations among children who were vitamin A deficient at baseline [19], and visual ability to see in low-light conditions [19]. Breastfeeding mothers who consumed PVA maize for 3 mo had an improvement in the vitamin A concentration of their breast milk, and the prevalence of low-vitamin A concentration in breast milk was reduced by >50% [20]. In addition, there have been recent criticisms as to the cost effectiveness and impact of biofortification, and even suggestions that it may have diverted resources and efforts away from more promising strategies such as dietary diversification [21,22].Against this background, the objectives of the study were as follows: 1) to assess the adequacy of vitamin A in the diets of a diversity of households in a site typical of rural Zimbabwe, 2) to project the impact of large-scale adoption of PVA maize and other nutrition interventions under farm conditions, and 3) to model the cost and composition of diets adequate in vitamin A. We hypothesized the following: 1) that dietary intake of vitamin A would differ across farm types, 2) that PVA maize could be a viable option to address inadequate vitamin A intake for some farms but not all, and 3) that the cost of diets adequate in vitamin A would be above the current cost of diets for the majority households.The District of Murehwa (-17.6432, 31.7840, 1400 m.a.s.l.), located within Mashonaland East Province, Zimbabwe, was selected for the study. This district is predominantly rural, with 80% of the population engaged in small-scale agriculture as their primary livelihood strategy. The prevalence of stunting is greater in Murehwa (36%) than the national average and increased by 6% between 2010 and 2018 [23], indicating persistent nutritional challenges. This is despite agricultural productivity being relatively higher than in most other districts. The area receives a mean annual rainfall of 750-1000 mm [24], mostly falling between October and April. The main soil types include relatively infertile Lixisols and comparatively more fertile Luvisols [25]. Cattle and goats are the main livestock species, and maize is the staple crop [26].The current study was conducted as part of a larger survey, with recruitment methods described previously [27]. Briefly, 2 wards from Murehwa District with contrasting agricultural soil types and elevation were purposively selected: Ward 4 and Ward 27. In September 2020, a total of 306 farms representing around 7.5% of the population were selected at random within these 2 wards, using an adaptation of the Y sampling [28], and the household head was recruited and interviewed following informed consent. From the dataset, 4 farm types were identified using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering [29].Type 1 can be described as larger farms with larger livestock herds, high-food security, high-dietary diversity, and crop sales as the main source of income. Type 2 are characterized by intermediate farm and herd sizes, high-food security, and lowdietary diversity. Type 3 are predominantly female-headed households, with intermediate farm and herd sizes, lower food security, and intermediate dietary diversity. Finally, Type 4 farms tend to be households with younger heads, smaller farms and herds, lower food security and dietary diversity, and off-farm activities as main source of income. Based on this typology, a representative sample of 30 rural households was selected through stratified sampling (using ward and farm type as strata). The sample was limited to 30 households due to resource constraints.Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (IREC 2020.016). All participants provided written informed consent for their participation in the study. Food consumption data were generated at household level using weighed food records. For a week (7 d) between the period 7 and 16 April 2021 (end of wet season) and for a second week between the period 24 October and 1 November 2021 (end of dry season), all food and drink items consumed as a meal or snack by the 30 selected households and its weight were recorded. Only items consumed at home were recorded. For recipes, every raw ingredient was identified and weighed before cooking. The source of each food item-food production, purchase, gift, hunting/gathering, or other-was also recorded. Records were made at the time of food preparation and consumption by a trained member of the household, typically an adult female, receiving regular visits from a research assistant during some of the meals to ensure data was captured accurately. Research assistants were advised not to accept food from households, even when offered. During these visits, records made in the absence of research assistants were also checked. The weight of each food item consumed was estimated using containers of various sizes (jug, bowl, cup, cooking spoon, table spoon, and tea spoon). The quantity of some food items was also estimated by counting units (e.g., for eggs, small tomatoes, medium-sized sweet potatoes, etc.). For each food item and in each household, the unit of measure was then calibrated by a research assistant using portable scales with a 0.1 g resolution. Inedible portions and food waste from these food items were not estimated (food waste tends to be negligible in the community studied). For every meal (or snack), household members taking part were also recorded, including their sex and age. A total of 4543 individual food items consumed at household level were recorded, and their weight was estimated-2294 during the wet season and 2249 during the dry season.Market surveys also took place during both monitoring periods to collect the local price of all food items recorded. Prices were collected from more than one source (with a target of 3-5 different sources) for each food item whenever possible, and the median was taken. For some uncommon items (16 items in the wet season and 35 in the dry season), it was only possible to collect market price data from one source. Across both seasons, 564 market prices were recorded (289 during the wet season and 275 during the dry season) for 176 food items (82 during the wet season and 94 during the dry season).Food consumption data sets were first matched to food composition datasets on a like-for-like basis, considering food description and moisture content. Each food item in the consumption data set was matched to a single representative item from composition tables published by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) [30]. We chose this source because the food tables available for Zimbabwe were published >2 decades ago and were relatively limited in terms of the food items they included [31]. For items that could not be found in SAMRC (2017), we used composition data compiled for Malawi [32]. Finally, for wild fruits and vegetables, we used the database published by Stadlmayr et al. [33]. A few items could not be found in any of these sources, and we therefore used the US Department of Agriculture FoodData Central [34]. Cooking oil and margarine were considered industrially fortified with vitamin A, as this is prevalent in Zimbabwe. The full set of consumption-composition item matches is provided in Supplementary materials -Appendix 1. Weekly household intake of energy, protein, vitamin A, and selected other vitamins and minerals were then calculated by summing the products of quantities and concentrations for each food item consumed.For each household and each week of observation, requirements for vitamin A were calculated based on the characteristics of household members present each day and using the mean harmonized average requirement values published by Allen et al. [18]. Based on these values, weekly household intakes were then expressed on a per adult male (25-50 y old) equivalent and per day basis, using the requirement value for vitamin A of 570 μg RAE [18]. This assumed food was distributed among household members according to their vitamin A requirements. Using the median of local prices for each food item and assuming all food was sourced from local market purchases, indicative cost of diets was calculated. These costs are indicative as they are estimates of the cost a household would incur if they were to purchase diets from the local market, whereas households in the study area source a significant share of their diets from their own production (and gifts).To project the impact of large-scale adoption of PVA maize, we modeled the intake of vitamin A assuming all maize products to have a vitamin A concentration equal to one of the following values: the mean concentration recorded on farm (28.3 μg RAE per 100 g of dry matter; [35]), the maximum concentration recorded on-farm (40.4 μg RAE per 100 g of dry matter; [35]), the maximum concentration recorded on-station of a released variety (95.0 μg RAE per 100 g of dry matter; Ndhlela, pers. com.), and to the target concentration according to Bouis et al. [14] (125 μg RAE per 100 g of dry matter).Finally, the composition and cost of the least expensive indicative diets adequate in vitamin A were calculated using linear programming with the Rstats package lpSolve [36]. Models were analyzed for an adult male-25-50 y old-on a per day basis and set to minimize the cost of diets while achieving a daily intake of vitamin A >570 μg RAE (the mean harmonized average requirement value published by Allen et al. [18]). To obtain realistic diets and minimize deviation from current ones, intakes of energy, protein, and selected micronutrients (those displayed Supplementary materials-Appendix 2) were constrained to fall between 100%-200% of baseline values (mean values recorded for the total sample of 30 households). The same rule was applied to intake (in g of dry matter) in food belonging to the food groups 'cereals,' 'dark green leafy vegetables,' and 'legumes, nuts, and seeds' (groups according to Kennedy et al. [37]), as these food groups dominated observed diets. A constraint of intake lower than twice the mean values recorded for the total sample of households was set for the other food groups.Differences between types were tested through ANOVA, followed by a Tukey post hoc test when differences between types were revealed, using the Rstats package stats [38].The size of households included in the study was larger during the wet season than during the dry season: 8.1 AE 5.0 compared with 5.8 AE 2.8, respectively (Table 1). During both seasons, children (aged 1-17 y) represented the dominant group (3.0 AE 2.1 and 2.5 AE 1.9 during the wet season and the dry season, respectively), followed by young female adults (aged 18-50 y; 1.8 AE 1.7 and 2.5 AE 1.9 during the wet season and the dry season, respectively). No statistically significant differences in household size and household composition were found between the 4 farm types, except Type 2 farms having significantly more children than Type 1 farms during the dry season (Table 1).During both seasons, diets were dominated by cereals, with mean daily quantities consumed estimated at 396.0 and 509.1 g/ d per adult male equivalent during the wet and the dry season, respectively (Table 2). Other important food groups were 'legumes, nuts, and seeds,' 'white roots and tubers,' and 'sweets.' Consumptions of eggs, organ meat, and vitamin A-rich fruits were very low (<5 g/d per adult male equivalent) in both seasons. The mean (AESD) energy intake was 14,662 AE 4549 kJ per day per adult male equivalent during the wet season and 13,370 AE 3455 kJ per day per adult male equivalent during the dry season (Table 3). These values are plausible given the minimum recommended dietary allowances published by Otten et al. [39] (2006).Out of the 30 households under observation, only 3 had a diet adequate in vitamin A during the wet season and only 1 during the dry season (Figure 1). During both seasons, 10 households reached at least half of the daily requirement in vitamin A. Inadequacies were also commonly observed for several other nutrients, including protein, riboflavin, vitamin B12, choline, and calcium during both seasons, and vitamin C during the dry season (see values in Table 3 compared with Supplementary materials -Appendix 2). Vitamin A was predominantly supplied by meals, with a small contribution from snacks during the wet season (Figure 1 A and B). The main sources of vitamin A were foods produced on the farm and purchased food, during both seasons (Figure 1 C and D). The food groups contributing to most of the vitamin A were 'dark green leafy vegetables' (55.6% and 55.3% of the average diet in the wet season and the dry season, respectively) and 'vitamin A-rich vegetables and tubers' (25.4% and 23.2% of the average diet in the wet season and the dry season, respectively) (Figure 1 E and F). Although Type 4 farms in the wet season and Type 2 and Type 4 farms in the dry season tended to have lower average intake of vitamin A compared with the other farm types, vitamin A intake did not statistically differ between farm types during the wet or dry season (Figure 1 G and H, Table 3).The mean (AE SD) indicative cost of current diets was USD 1.43 AE 0.59 day -1 during the wet season and USD 0.96 AE 0.40 day -1 during the dry season (Figure 2). The food groups that accounted for the largest proportion of this cost were 'legumes, nuts and seeds,' 'cereals,' 'other vegetables,' and 'other fruits' during the wet season (20.5%, 20.3%, 12.9%, and 12.6% of the mean cost, respectively), and 'cereals,' 'legumes, nuts and seeds,' 'vitamin A-rich vegetables and tubers,' and 'white roots and tubers' during the dry season (24.3%, 13.7%, 9.4%, and 8.0% of the mean cost, respectively). Kale and covo (2 different cultivars of Brassica oleracea var. acephala) and rape (Brassica napus) were among the least expensive sources of vitamin A during both the wet and the dry season (Figure 3). Kale was the least expensive source during the wet season, and carrot was the least expensive during the dry season.If all maize products consumed were PVA maize with a vitamin A concentration of 28.3 μg RAE per 100 g of dry matter (the mean concentration recorded on farm), diets would only be adequate in vitamin A for 4 households (out of 30) during the wet season, and 2 during the dry season (Figure 4). This means that only 2 additional households during the wet season and one additional household during the dry season would reach vitamin A adequacy compared with the current situation. However, 50% of the households would reach at least half of their daily The estimated minimum cost (per adult male equivalent per day) of a diet adequate in vitamin A was USD 0.975 day -1 during the wet season and USD 0.793 day -1 during the dry season (Figure 5), i.e., above the current cost of diets for only 6 households during the wet season and 12 households during the dry season (Figure 2). Compared with the average current diet, the diet adequate in vitamin A at minimum cost would imply a doubling in the consumption of 'dark green leafy vegetables' (Table 2). It would also require a substantial increase in the consumption of 'flesh meat' during both seasons and 'oils and fats' during the dry season.If all maize products consumed were PVA maize, with a vitamin A concentration of 28.3 μg RAE per 100 g (the mean concentration recorded on farm) and assuming no difference in cost with current maize products, the cost of a diet adequate in vitamin A is expected to be reduced to USD 0.923 day -1 during the wet season and to USD 0.766 day -1 during the dry season (Figure 5). With a vitamin A concentration of 40.4 μg RAE per 100 g (the maximum concentration recorded on farm) and 95 μg RAE per 100 g (the maximum concentration recorded on station) for all maize products, this cost during the wet season would become USD 0.919 day -1 and USD 0.914 day -1 , respectively, and during the dry season USD 0.759 day -1 and USD 0.750 day -1 , respectively. No difference in the cost of a diet adequate in vitamin A would be expected between a vitamin A concentration of all maize products of 95 μg RAE per 100 g or 125 μg RAE per 100 g (the target concentration).To date, all studies (to the best of our knowledge) focusing on the potential health impact of biofortified crops, including maize, have used crops produced under optimal conditions onstation or on commercial farms [19,20,40,41]. However, the nutritional concentration of biofortified crops decreases under suboptimal conditions and thus when produced by resource constrained smallholder farmers [42]. In the secondary data used in this research, the mean vitamin A concentration of maize grown in smallholder farmers' fields was ~1/3 of that of PVA maize grown under optimal conditions (irrigated, well-fertilized, and nondegraded soils [35]). To our knowledge, this is the first study to account for a range of micronutrient concentrations (in this case, vitamin A) of biofortified crops in the projection of their likely impact.Our results suggest that large-scale adoption of PVA maize in the area (without additional interventions) would not lead to an adequate vitamin A intake for most households unless concentrations currently not achieved on-farm (concentrations of 95.0 μg RAE per 100 g dry matter or more) could be reached (Figure 4). However, the consumption of PVA maize grown under ensure that most households reach at least half of their daily requirements, which was the original target for PVA maize breeding [14], with a stronger effect during the dry season (Figure 4). Better understanding the links between soil fertility, fertilizer use, and vitamin A concentration remains an interesting avenue not yet fully explored, to potentially increase the benefit of PVA maize produced under typical smallholder conditions. Earlier studies have shown a significant positive contribution of soil fertility management to grain micronutrient concentration in cereals [43][44][45][46]. Pathways between soil fertility and grain concentration would probably be different for vitamin A and for micronutrients that can be supplied through fertilizers and/or organic soil amendments. Recent results in the study area indicate that lower PVA concentrations in the grain on-farm might be related to a generally lower energy status of the plant under limiting conditions [35].In addition to highlighting the likely impact of PVA maize consumption on vitamin A intake, our study points to the importance of complementary nutrition interventions, including diet diversification, industrial fortification, and supplementation. Contrary to our original hypothesis, we found that most households could obtain a diet adequate in vitamin A from food produced on their farms or available in local markets at a cost that does not exceed the current cost of their diets (Figures 2 and 5). However, the large-scale adoption of PVA maizeassuming no price difference between biofortified and nonbiofortified maize products-would only lead to a modest reduction in the cost of diets adequate in vitamin A, even at higher concentrations of vitamin A in maize (Figure 5). Adopting a diet adequate in vitamin A at minimum cost would imply a substantial increase in the consumption of 'dark green leafy vegetables' and 'flesh meat' (Table 2), which could be supported by targeted interventions. The promotion of home gardens in South Africa has been demonstrated to significantly improve the consumption of dark green leafy vegetables and reduce vitamin A deficiencies [47]. Similarly, the promotion of small livestock rearing in Ethiopia has been found to significantly increase the consumption of micronutrient-rich meat and milk [48].In addition to 'dark green leafy vegetables,' 'oils and fats' are a food group that makes a significant contribution to diets adequate in vitamin A during the dry season (Table 2). These food items are industrially fortified with vitamin A in Zimbabwe and represent a cheap source of vitamin A, although mainly for adults rather than infants and children whose food habits tend to differ [9]. The latter group, however, may benefit from high-dose vitamin A supplementation programs that run every 6 mo, targeting children from birth until the age of 5 y [10]. Industrial fortification could also be expanded to include sugar and cereal products, in addition to cooking oil [49]: the universal fortification of these staples would increase dietary vitamin A supplies, including potentially for vulnerable communities, although very low-income households may still have dietary vitamin A shortfalls as seen in Malawi [3]. In addition, local small-scale food fortification of flour is currently being piloted in parts of sub-Saharan Africa, targeting that milled maize flour is fortified with essential micronutrients before consumption and could be expanded to the study area [50].The lack of association between vitamin A intake and farm type (Figures 1 G and H) demonstrates that vitamin A adequacy is independent of wealth and suggests that complementary interventions, including the promotion of dietary diversification, focusing on vitamin A-rich sources, may be important in the context of rural Zimbabwe, as previously demonstrated in other contexts [51]. Some of the households studied used sun-drying of vegetables, which ensured a consistent supply of vitamin A, including during the drier months, a practice that could be promoted to other households (although vitamin A concentration may be affected by the practice [52]). Although the contribution of wild foods to vitamin A intake was found to be insignificant in this study (Figures 1 C and D), they have been found to be important in other communities of Zimbabwe [53] and could play a role in promoting year-round consumption of vitamin A-rich food in Murehwa.There were several limitations of this study, which are highlighted to guide future studies. First, this research was conducted at household level and assumed foods were distributed among household members according to their vitamin A requirements. Although studies have found reasonably equitable distribution of food within the household context [54] it is not always the case, with household members-mainly children and females-who may be undernourished in households that are nutritionally adequate [55]. Intrahousehold food distribution may be particularly unequal for nutrient-dense food such as animal-sourced food [56]. Therefore, future research should assess vitamin A intake at individual level, with a focus on children aged !5 y, girls, and women of reproductive age as they have the highest requirements for most nutrients [57]. Second, vitamin A intake may have been overestimated. Both storage and processing/cooking (i.e., drying of vegetables) have been shown to reduce vitamin A content [52,58] and were not monitored in this study. Food waste within the household was also not considered, although this tends to be low in low-income countries [59]. Third, food composition data used in this study originated from neighboring countries, which may differ from actual compositions. Finally, this study could be improved by assessing serum retinol concentration as a biomarker of vitamin A status, which may be poorly correlated with vitamin A intake [60].In conclusion, this study confirms that diets in rural Zimbabwe tend to be inadequate in vitamin A (as well as proteins and several other micronutrients, including riboflavin, vitamin B12, choline, calcium, and vitamin C), often only reaching less than half the dietary requirements. Our results demonstrate that the adoption of PVA maize would ensure that most households reach at least half of their daily vitamin A requirement, which was the original target for PVA maize breeding, even when accounting for the lower vitamin A concentration achieved onfarm. However, our study also shows that the adoption of PVA maize alone will not lead to adequate vitamin A intake (i.e., meeting 100% of daily requirements) for most households unless nutrient concentrations achieved under typical on-farm management increased. In addition to PVA maize, this study found evidence that other nutrition interventions could have a positive effect on vitamin A intake, including dietary diversification, industrial fortification (as already practiced for cooking oil and margarine), and supplementation.Although PVA maize can help alleviate the problem of low intake of vitamin A, the current adoption of PVA maize in Zimbabwe remains very low. In a nationally representative survey conducted in 2018, only 6% and 2% of rural households were found to consume and grow biofortified crops, respectively [61]. In a survey of 295 farms in Ward 4 and Ward 27 of Murehwa District conducted in February 2023, 35% of the farms were found to grow PVA maize, but seed was received as a gift or handout from programs running in the area, with no household purchasing seeds [62]. In contrast, 49% declared having knowledge of PVA maize and its benefits but did not grow it, primarily due to limited availability of seed. Strengthening the seed value chain for PVA maize is thus crucial to increasing its adoption. However, the cost and effort of doing so should be weighed against alternative interventionse.g., promotion of home gardening and small stock keeping, small-scale food fortificationas recently suggested [21]."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2953857227.json b/main/part_2/2953857227.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b4e004a33e6a7004159a6011bf7cdf9ffd7d564 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2953857227.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"f45e2a25-2278-4e48-b2b3-d76672781327","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2962773283.json b/main/part_2/2962773283.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2564414a067ff76218d6009f42fc27afdba1ba10 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2962773283.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"542ca6c96ea92395566a8678273541f4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b3ca392b-4741-4801-a85f-4ee8a83469d9/retrieve","id":"-1352846199"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9ebed218-a9b3-4652-8a24-452fd9398e3a","content":"A Training Workshop for Trainers in Results-Based Monitoring & Evaluation (RBM&E) was held at Adama from 02 to 05 July of 2012. This Workshop was jointly organized by the Oromia Bureau of Agriculture (OBoA) and Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) project upon the request from OBoA. This is the 6 th training workshop and it is part of the capacity building program that IPMS provided for the four regions where the project was operating and for federal MoA. In this particular training about 39 participants from all Oromia zones were expected to attained but due to the county's annual budget closing time only 22 trainees (19 males and 3 females) have been trained with full attendance.The training workshop was officially opened by Ato Dechassa Dugassa, Coffee Production Area Extension Manager. On his opening speech, he said that \"this is really the right time to build more our capacity on monitoring and evaluation as a bureau.\" He has then asked the participants to pay a special attention and grasp the knowledge from this essential training to be equipped with RBM&E and also transfer to your colleagues to build a team in their respected areas. He has also thanked IPMS for coming forward and offering RBM&E training to help in this crucial capacity that our bureau urgently needed for the region as a whole. Before the training started, the trainees were asked to list their expectations from the training workshop. Accordingly, 22 participants gave their expectations which are summarized in Table 1 below. About 20% of them were expected practical application of M&E on their respective areas. The TOT program consisted of 10 different sessions of which 7 of them were with practical group exercises.Two groups were formed from different zones. Each group were allowed to select its own project and discusses then come up with consensus to the preliminary session. During the group presentations, real and important discussions and experience sharing between participants has been made. They have also got critical and supportive comments/suggestions about their presentations both from other groups and especially from the trainer according to the program/sessions. (see Annex 3 for the general program).Group members doing the excercisesAt the end of the training workshop participants evaluated the workshop on a scale of five points ( 1= very poor, 2= poor, 3= fair , 4= good, 5=Very good). The results are presented below. In addition, the participants gave their written assessment about the strength and weakness of the workshop. The facilitation was nice with good materialsCertificate of attendance were issued to the trainees at the end of the workshop. Attendance was twice a day (in the morning and in the afternoon) to make sure that all participants have attended all sessions. The certificate were designed in-house by IPMS, signed by Ato Abebe Diriba, Deputy Head and Surplus Producing Area Extension Manager of OBoA and Dr. Berhanu Gebremedhin of IPMS, sealed by OBoA and handed over by Ato Abdu Haji Kedir, deputy head of OBoA and Dr. Berhanu Gebremedhin.Finally Ato Abdu gave closing remarks by thanking the resource person for the valuable knowledge he shared to the trainees. He has also appreciated IPMS for its important partnership in the region for the last couple of years and he has a hope to strengthen this partnership with the new project (LIVES) too. Ato Abdu also reminded the participants to first internalize the knowledge they gain from this training and share this skill with their colleagues to build a strong team at their respective working areas. Ato Abdu also promised to the participants that the bureau is happy and willing to support and facilitate more capacity building trainings and even to restructure the M&E system in the region. Some of the trainees have expressed their feelings about the training verbally. Most of the feelings are similar and says that they had never get a chance to be trained with such practical and applicable training except a shortage of time for such a big and important subject.By this, the 6 th RBM&E training workshop came to the end by awarding certificate.Certificates handed over by Ato Abdu and Dr. Berhanu"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2973919198.json b/main/part_2/2973919198.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0b7c31d52c852d34c87dc30aeb1e08759bb3249 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2973919198.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ed031a9e4369cdd66dc9da6e8f13f667","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8f99870c-1255-4e56-9be4-11006b9f51a9/retrieve","id":"-1200357703"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f308ff8d-ddff-4cbe-b427-dbc47918b54a","content":"Pig farmers are usually smallholders. About 90% of them had sold no more than five pigs in the past year (last 12 months) and they usually sold one animal at a time. There are periods of high and low demand for pigs. The high demand usually coincides with the festive seasons of the Easter and Christmas/end of year. Sales also go up in times when schools are about to open for the new term. Pig farmers are usually price takers. 37% of the farmers indicated that they had received Ushs15,000-90,000 per animal; 53% had received between Ushs 100,000-200,000; while some 10% had received between Ushs.220,000-400,000. Payments are all made in cash. Although men usually take the lead in some of the key expenditure items like school fees, women also play a significant role in providing food, medical attention and clothing for their households.Medium sized sows and finishers make up for most of the sales. They go for average price ranging between Ushs 100,000 to 250,000 per animal. There is no standard method of grading animals. The traders/buyers determine the price to pay the farmer arbitrarily, depending on the visual appearance of the animal. The premium price for good quality may reach Ushs 350,000 if sold to urban traders, farmers and NGOs. Some of the quality attributes buyers consider include; weight and height, breed, and physical health of the animal is important. Swine fever outbreaks are common and these usually wipe out the entire stock. Unfortunately such outbreaks are common and measures such as animal movement permits and quarantines are weak. Qualified Veterinary service providers are few and to fill the void there are also many unqualified personnel offering services to farmers. And because of the high risk involved in piggery, there are no financial institutions that are will lend to pig farmers. Farmers cope with the funding challenge by obtaining personal loans. The interest rates charged are in the range of 36% p.a. and payments are scheduled to be made weekly.This report presents a study on factors influencing successful inclusion of smallholder farmers into value chains in Uganda. Value chains are considered 'inclusive' if they supply agri-food products from smallholder farmers. These inclusive value chains differentiate themselves from marketing channels where smallholder farmers are not producing for a clearly identified market outlet, whether they deliver commodities to markets in an ad hoc way, or are not selling their agri-food commodities because these are bartered within their community or consumed directly by the household. The research was done on three value chains that are relevant to the local context selecting and comparing control and treatment groups of farmers in each value chain. All three value chains already have some linkages between smallholder farmers and agribusinesses in the study area. The three value chains chosen were cooking bananas, one livestock (pigs) and aquaculture. The research endeavored to provide lessons to further understand the factors that influence smallholder farmers' participation in inclusive value chains, the associated relationships within the value chains as well as and constraints.To study farmers that are participating in the cooking banana (also referred to as matooke) inclusive value chains, the Consultant selected to focus the study in the Mbarara-matooke market area. Farmers participating in the inclusive fish value chains were already predetermined in the research proposal. These were the aquaculture farmers that are members of WAFICOS (Walimi Fish Farmers' Cooperative Society). The research team already has a close working relationship with the Kati Farms. These were identified by comparing the list from WAFICOS with fish input dealers' customers. Active members from the WAFISOS membership list formed the treatment sample population of interest while aquaculture farmers that were marketing their fish produce individually consisted of the control group. For the pig value chain, the research was carried out in the same districts as the existing ILRIled Uganda pig projects (IFAD-EU and Irish Aid funded Smallholder Pig Value Chain projects) under the CGIAR research program on Livestock and Fish in order to create synergies and build on the existing research findings.The selected indicators for factors that have a potential to influence participation of smallholder farmers in inclusive value chains included Level of education of the farmer; Financial resources of the farmer; socio-economic factors affecting business relationship; Yield expectations; Organization of farmers in formal or informal groups; Location with respect to commercial buyer's premises; Suitability of soils and climate; product supplied through the value chain; Ease of access to support services/inputs; Government infrastructure provision and policies; Contracts; and Client relationships.The surveys on each of the value chains covered 100 farmers of whom 50 were involved in inclusive value chains and 50 were not. The following observations were made;Pig farmers did not depend on piggery alone for income. Most (65%) of them were also engaged in crop farming, some were either salaried employees of self-employed (30%). Many farmers ranked it as either the second or third (92%) most important source of income. Although men are important players, women were more involved than men in the piggery enterprises at home as shown in the Table 3.2. It is also notable that women were quite involved in pig farming, marketing and sale, as well as decision making in spending the proceeds from pig sales.The correlation analysis of pig value chain farmers showed that the piggery farmers have a trusted ready market that pays them cash on time which negates the need to look for credit facilities. It also suggests that farmers keep pigs as a form of savings (current asset easy to liquidate). This observation probably explains the high sales farmers mentioned that occur during times of school fees and in the festive periods when they require cash. The Logit regression analysis showed that being a member of a credit or a good agricultural practices (GAP) group makes it less likely to be involved in an organized pig value chain. This surprising finding is explained by the multiple products produced on the same farm. By probing pig farmers further on this issue, it turned out that the credit and GAP groups had been created for their crop enterprise rather than the pig enterprise. The results of the regression model further indicate that farmers who had sold more animals tended to look out for bulk market channels, i.e. the urban traders.Analysis of the banana farmer households showed that all the banana farmers (100%) ranked the banana crop as their most important source of income. Crops like coffee and cattle rearing were also common sources of income mentioned. Other sources of income included self employment off the farm (21%) and salaried employment (14%). In the banana value chain, men are more involved in the overall production and management activities as well as decision making compared to the women. What is notable however is that in spite of their involvement in these activities, women do have a say in deciding how proceeds from the banana farm will be used.Bananas are produced for both household consumption and for sale. A greater proportion of the production is sold. 75% of the farmers sell more than half of their production. Banana is a staple crop in Uganda and there are numerous traders of the product due to the high demand. Thus farmers are presented with several options of buyers that include local traders, local markets, and urban traders. There is no standard for grading system for bananas. The price of a bunch of bananas is determined arbitrarily and although prices may vary in the high and low supply seasons, most (81%) of farmers are paid Ushs.5000-10,000 per bunch. Payments are usually made in cash and in most cases; the traders buying from the farm gate do transport their purchases. Banana farmers meet several challenges in production and marketing of their produce. The crop is infested by a host of pest and diseases and the most devastating of these is the Banana Bacterial Wilt. The disease spreads very fast and can wipe out the entire plantation if not well managed. Indeed many farmers in Uganda have reported significant losses due to the disease. Using Pearson's Correlation Coefficient analysis of value chain participants it was found that there is a ready market for bananas with buyers readily available to purchase bananas. However, farmers seem to have developed a strong business relationship with buyers including exchange of information, trust, credit and satisfaction. Also, some indicators of inclusive value chains (a ready market outlet, trust and fair prices) do exist from the perspective of small householder banana farmers. However, the prevailing banana market is large enough to also readily absorb any available produce. The Logit regression analysis showed that there is open completion in the banana market; and farmers who are more educated, have suitable land for production and have a mobile phone connection/access are more likely to participate in an inclusive banana value chain. The analysis showed that investing to improve soil fertility to boost production and mobile phone connectivity to connect with the market can multiply by 2.5 the likelihood that banana farmers will be part of organized value chains.Analysis of the fish farmers showed that only 17% of the fish farmers ranked aquaculture as their main source of income. 8% ranked it as the second and the majority 75% of them ranked it as the third to fifth income source. Other sources of income mentioned included crop farming salaried employment and self employment income from the household head. In the aquaculture value chain, men are the predominant players (in over 80% of households) although women involvement (about 20%of households) is also visible.Aquaculture fish prices are largely uniform nationwide, irrespective of the buyer. Currently the average farm gate price is Ushs6500 per Kg. The price may however rise to 8500 per Kg in times of scarcity. Aquaculture fish competes with the bigger traditional capture fish market, and hence its seasonal variations. Payments are made in cash at the farm gate. Farmers also reported isolated cases where buyers booked their fish and paid for it 2-3 months in advance. There are no set quality standards for fish. However, buyers prefer to buy large size fish that have reached at above 0.5 Kg for Tilapia and 1 Kg for Cat Fish at maturity. Tilapia with a dark shiny black colour is much more preferred, and may fetch a premium price of UShs 5000 above the normal price. Unfortunately farmers do not have the skills, knowledge and capacity to raise their fish to have the desired attributes.Unlike in situations where fish is sold to local markets, the fish is usually sold in bulk to a single buyer. Ideally at harvest time, the fish is removed from the pond or cages in one lot, weighted, paid for, and transported through a cold chain. Normally the buyer pays for transportation of their produce. Transportation through a cold chain is one of the biggest challenges fish farmers face as such vehicles are rare and expensive to own or even hire. And still because aquaculture is not well developed in Uganda, suppliers of fish feeds are few and expensive; and so are the sources of reliable fingerling quality, tools and equipment. The fisheries legal framework also presents challenges for aquaculture farmers.Fish farming has inherent risks to the extent that conditioning the fish natural environment i.e. water, to suit the commercial farming requirements and also maintaining the cold chain necessary to keep the fish fresh from harvest to the final consumer are rather costly undertakings for the ordinary Ugandan fish farmers. And also, because the fisheries sector is largely under-developed in Uganda with little government support, fish value chain players are very few and disjointed. Thus fish farmers have to fend for themselves to keep their businesses alive by all means. Other specific challenges include: high cost of feeds of doubted quality; lack of authentic sources of fingerlings and other inputs; inadequate production and management skills and extension services; high working capital; and an inadequate regulatory environment.The logit regression results showed that at farmer level, the likelihood of being part of an organised value chains went down with the lesser importance of fish farming in household income. Also the less educated the famer was, the more likely they were to engage in organised fish value chains-every year spent in school leads to a 0.2decrease in the odds of getting involved in an organised value chain. Further discussions with the farmers indicated that more educated people are more risk averse and will tend to shy away from aquaculture which is very risky.The results of this study allow the identification of the following factors as significant in increasing the odds of smallholder farmers joining inclusive value chains:  Soil fertility (positive impact)  Amount of commodity produced (positive impact)  Level of sophistication of the mode of transport used to reach market (positive impact)  A good mobile phone network (positive impact)  Membership of a credit group (negative impact)  Members of a group on Good agricultural practices (negative impact)  Share of the enterprise in the farm's income generation (negative impact)  Education level of the household head (positive or negative depending on commodity)  Gender (men are more likely to be involved in inclusive value chains) These findings require further research in order to qualify them and to identify the possible reverse effect that being part of an inclusive value chain could have on the variables that were hypothesized as explanatory in this study.The study showed that support to inclusive value chain development is still critical in developing countries. In Uganda for example, the small and micro enterprises have specific needs that are often neglected in favor of top-down government policies that support medium and large businesses instead. The study results on pig, banana and fish smallholder farmers show that investing to improve soil fertility and mobile phone connectivity can multiply by 2.5 the likelihood that banana farmers will be part of organized value chains. These results can help guide government and donor investment within the agricultural production, marketing and natural resources management systems. On the other hand, the fact that the likelihood of farmers joining organized value chains actually decreased with the lesser importance of fish as the main source of household income or with pig farmers' belonging to a GAP or credit group (indicators that farmers were investing in their other productions) is a reminder that the smallholder production systems in developing countries are very much intertwined and no intervention on one part of the system can be considered separately from the rest of the farmers' enterprises. By neglecting such specific needs, smaller enterprises particularly in agriculture tend to remain informal and produce below their growth potential.The Ugandan agriculture sector employs about 70% of the population in Uganda, its growth in recent years averaged 1.3% per annum between 2005-2012 has remained lower than the population growth rate estimated at 3.2% per annum over the same period. Recent studies in Uganda show that access to productive assets, including all types of livestock, can provide rural households with a tremendous opportunity to generate income and to move out of poverty. Not only do livestock and livestock products play an important role in income generation, they are also sources of high quality protein and contribute significantly to overall household nutrition. Livestock in Uganda is predominantly in the hands of smallholder farmers, with each rearing a few animals at household level.This report presents a study on factors influencing successful inclusion of smallholder farmers into value chains in Uganda. Value chains are considered 'inclusive' if they supply agri-food products from smallholder farmers. The inclusive value chains studied are characterized by a definite sequence of actors involved, actors who collaborate at all stages of the chain to deliver the product that is being requested by its customers and the final consumers. These inclusive value chains differentiate themselves from marketing channels where smallholder farmers are not producing for a clearly identified market outlet, whether they deliver commodities to markets in an ad hoc way, or are not selling their agri-food commodities because these are bartered within their community or consumed directly by the household.The smallholders involved in the value chains studied under this research are located within the Lake Victoria Basin in Uganda, which is characterized by a humid tropical highland agroecological environment. This research is linked to the CGIAR Research Programs on Humid Tropics and Livestock and Fish. The research will contribute to disseminating its findings to Humid tropics multi-stakeholder research-for-development platforms and to Livestock and Fish value chain actors, and to value chain actors and policy makers in other action sites in Africa and the Caribbean. This sharing of lessons learned is likely to contribute to CTA's longterm development outcome of improved efficiency, inclusiveness and profitability of agricultural value chains in ACP countries.The research was done on three value chains that are relevant to the local context. All three already have some value chain linkages between smallholder farmers and agribusinesses in the study area. The three value chains chosen were one crop (banana), one livestock (pigs) and aquaculture. The research endeavored to provide lessons to further understand the factors that influence smallholder farmers' participation in inclusive value chains, the associated relationships within the value chains as well as bottlenecks and constraints. The value chains of focus are described briefly below:In spite of its growth, the pig sector in Uganda has been quite neglected and is not among the priority enterprises selected under the Ugandan Agriculture Sector Development Strategy and Investment Plan for 2010-11 to 2014-15. Pig production has become an increasingly important livelihood activity over the past three decades in Uganda evidenced by the rapid rise in pig population from 0.19 to 3.2 million. The majority of the pigs are in the central and western regions. Most of the pig production, about 85%, is carried out as a backyard activity in smallholder households (owning less than 5 pigs each) in peri-urban and rural areas. Pigs play an important role in the livelihoods of poor families, because they help to generate income to cover emergency needs and pay school fees. It is common that the women and children are the responsible household members for the management of pigs, whereas men are engaged in marketing. The demand for pork has been on the rise due to changes in tastes, rising urbanization, among other factors. In 2011, Uganda had the highest per capita consumption of pork (3.4 kg/person/year) in sub-Saharan Africa including South Africa 1 . Most of the transactions of live pigs and pork products take place in informal markets that include on-farm exchanges, informal slaughter places, road side butcheries and informal ready to eat pork joints. Recently, formal markets have started dealing in good quality premium products for relatively well-off consumers. These formal markets include organized facilities that sell fresh cuts, fresh pork, and frozen pork products. Some of the smallholder producers are linked to these outlets through other traders and agents. The market for pork is still dominated by informal trade. Value addition in the live pigs and pig meat products is largely limited. About 98% of pigs are sold as live animals and are slaughtered for pork that is consumed with limited or no value addition 2 .Given this context, the recently initiated CGIAR Research Program on Livestock and Fish identified the smallholder pig value chain in Uganda as a high-potential target to translate research into major interventions that can stimulate pro-poor transformation and generate benefits at scale 3 .Pork consumption, though popular, remains well below the levels needed to achieve adequate intake of the critical nutrients that meat can provide. The study conducted by ILRI in 2012 confirmed that pork is frequently consumed and consumption is highest during periods of low food availability hence increasing its potential to contribute to nutritional security (Tatwangire, 2013). Improving pork production among smallholder farmers is expected to increase availability of affordable pork to poor households through sales in rural communities and urban markets. Increased pork production strategies if combined with appropriate nutritional messages is expected to give poor households better access to this high-quality source of nutrients and promote increased consumption among the most nutritionally challenged households. During this study, several productivity, marketing and capacity related constraints were identified along the smallholder pig value chain. These constraints limit the chain's potential to contribute to livelihoods of the poor. Thus, the pig value chain was selected for this study to complement the on-going value chain work and to draw lessons for other value chains.The highland cooking banana (Musa spp., AAA-EA genome), also called Matooke, is an important staple crop in Uganda. The crop is the primary food and livelihood base for about 16 million people. (Kabahenda et al, 2010) in central, western and eastern Uganda. Historically bananas have been grown in Uganda where they were important in the Buganda region, from where cultivation spread further. In the western and further south west, bananas have in the last 20-50 years replaced millet as the main staple food. There has been a major shift, with banana cultivation moving to the Western region from its traditional central region, a situation largely caused by the severe soil exhaustion faced by farmers in the central region. Ugandans consume bananas at an annual per capita rate of 200-300 kg (NARO Banana Research, 2009), the highest rate in the world. Banana is one of the most expensive foods, retailing in Kampala markets at prices ranging from 10,000-50,000 shillings for a bunch. Between 1996Between -2006, banana production fell by 78% with a yield gap of 140% kg/ha on farmers' fields as compared to research stations (MAAIF DSIP, 2010). This decline in production and productivity has been attributed largely to soil degradation as well as severe pest and disease outbreaks, (most notably of bacterial wilt, sigatoka and nematodes). Current estimates indicate that total local production is at 9.5 million MT annually (as at 2010), based on FAOSTAT data.There is a strong focus on the part of government and other actors to facilitate innovations through several new product lines in part to deal with the perishability of the product, by processing it into longer lasting products and as a way to tap into regional and international export opportunities. The initiative on value addition is being spearheaded by several actors including development organizations. The biggest effort in this area is being driven by the Presidential Initiative on Banana Industrial development (PIBID). PIBID strives to bring about the establishment of 'state of the art' banana processing enterprises in Uganda, producing value added banana products with competitive market strength both locally and globally, manned by rural farmers and entrepreneurs (PIBID Report, 2010). The potential to tap into export markets to widen the market base for Banana exists, and provides great opportunities for well organized farmers to benefit. As part of the health food and organic movement, dried fruits like bananas are becoming increasingly popular. However, accessing International markets presents significant challenges, such as high operating costs, high volume requirements and specific logistical capabilities.Banana originates from small scale individual farmers. These farmers are estimated to farm on plantations averaging 0.5-4 acres (0.2-1.6 hectares). Over 70% of bananas grown in Uganda consist of different types of highland cooking and beer bananas. An estimated 12 different types of banana cultivars are grown. A key challenge that farmers face is accessing well paying markets. When they sell individually, farmers find themselves at the lower end of a very long chain of agents. There are numerous middlemen between the farmer and the retailer, meaning that farmers get very low prices for their product.From the farm gate, farmers may sell directly to the nearby aggregating markets/agents or to local consumers, or to itinerant traders that approach their farms to collect and bulk bananas for sale to larger aggregating markets through brokers. There are often numerous middlemen between the farmer and the retailer, resulting in low price margins to the farmers. There are farmers who join collective banana marketing groups and benefit by being able to supply to wholesale businesses directly through contractual arrangements. Markets in Kampala and its suburbs are usually the main destination of the produce from where sales are made to household consumers, hotels, restaurants and schools. Some of the major markets are Owino, Kalerwe and Nakawa, among others. The poor road infrastructure in the villages and scattered nature of farmers in the villages makes it unfeasible for lorry traders to transact directly with the farmers. Several challenges abound in the banana value chain. At the producer level, farmers are facing: declining soil fertility; increasing land pressure; perishability; fluctuating seasonal prices; post-harvest losses; Pest and Disease; among others. These challenges are discussed in detail in Section 3.2.Ugandan aquaculture industry is slowly growing and is expected to expand rapidly in the next decade due to the widening supply-demand gap for domestically produced fish products resulting from over-fishing, compounded by environmental degradation and climate variability. There is widespread consensus among stakeholders that the gap can only be narrowed through aquaculture 4 . The smallholder capture fisheries sector is extremely vibrant, but the smallholder aquaculture sector is still struggling. It remains difficult for aquaculture producers to make profits let alone break even because of competition from the relatively low wholesale prices of capture fish (largely from Lake Victoria), the high cost of production associated with aquaculture and absent or weak business development services. The aquaculture value chain is characterized by temporal spot markets that occasionally link small numbers of actors who generally operate in inefficient ways. Despite these challenges some smallholder aquaculture producers have formed a cooperative society called \"Walimi Fish Farmers Cooperative Society (WAFICOS)\" which aims to help members have access to essential services and inputs while also addressing marketing and value addition.Recent market-oriented studies suggest that there is considerable potential for the development of markets for aquaculture products, both in Uganda and the East African region, largely due to rapidly declining catches of Nile perch and the high demand for fish. Efficient markets for the sale of wild fish exist, but very little farmed fish pass through these markets despite a large unmet demand for fish, and as a result the poor are in many places eating less fish. Very few small-scale fish farming enterprises have been shown to be profitable, and any profits are relatively small. There has so far not been enough production from aquaculture systems to make an impact on the Ugandan fish market and a sizeable portion of the fish produced goes to neighboring countries where markets are more lucrative.Among the barriers to development of the sector are that the aquaculture value chain in Uganda and the East African region is currently disjointed and ineffective; some would argue that there is no value chain at all. Other challenges in the sector include; low volumes of production to allow markets to develop; lack of investments in medium and large-scale aquaculture enterprises; high investment costs for small scale producers; low profitability from the production of farmed fish; and low price of fish near lakes due to the availability of wild fish. These and other challenges are discussed further in Section 3.3.2.This research was undertaken to identify factors influencing successful inclusion of smallholder farmers into value chains in Uganda. The survey was conducted on smallholder farmers that are already involved in inclusive value chains and compared their characteristics with a control group of smallholders who are not involved in inclusive value chains, as defined above. The statistical analysis of the data allowed for the identification of the factors that have a statistically significant probability of increasing, and decreasing, the likelihood of smallholders' joining value chains. The results from this research will be useful to organizations supporting the development of inclusive value chains, private sector actors interested in collaborating with smallholder farmers and agricultural policy makers through the identification of different enabling and deterring factors, over which they might have control. The research thus contributes directly to CTA's objectives of equipping institutions and individuals in Uganda and similar African countries to promote more efficient, inclusive and sustainable value chains.The sampling process for each of the three value chains involved the following activities; Site Selection and Respondent Selection. Below is a description of the process for each of the value chains.To study farmers that are participating in the cooking banana (also referred to as matooke) inclusive value chains, the Consultant selected to focus the study in the Mbarara-matooke market area. Located in Western Uganda, Mbarara has the biggest aggregation market in Uganda that supplies matooke to Kampala and the neighboring towns of Mukono, Entebbe, Jinja and as far as Nakasongola on the Northern axis, among others.As an aggregation point, the greater proportion of the bananas destined for Kampala and its environs starts from here. The market also serves as the collection point for the other neighboring matooke producing Districts of Ntungamo, Rukungiri, Ibanda and greater Bushenyi District.Various forms of traders also operate in this market, and these include Kampala based traders, local aggregators and traders, brokers, middlemen, among others: The bananas sold in the Mbarara market come through various channels, that include; Individual smallholder farmers selling to Kampala based traders who in turn sell to outlets/retailers in Kampala;  Smallholder farmers selling to rural based traders (e.g. on a bicycle or small truck/pick-up) who also bulk and sell to the Kampala based traders; or  \"Large scale\" farmers selling directly to the traders. In this arrangement there is some form of unwritten agreement that, the trader will for a specific period of time, buy all the farmers' banana produce for a given period (advance booking) at the prevailing market price on the day of harvest.Because of this apparently established system of farmer -market linkage, we focused on the Mbarara banana market for this study.Below is a description of the respondent sample collection for the treatment and control groups for banana farmers.As described above, there is an already established system for farmers selling to a ready offtake market. Through consultation with the traders operating in the Mbarara market we selected sub-counties and villages from which we developed a list of farmers from the districts of Mbarara and Ntungamo. The farmers targeted were those selling bananas through the channels identified above. The list developed provided the population from which random samples of 50 farmers were drawn from the two districts of Mbarara and Ntungamo. Half the farmers interviewed were women.The farmers selected in the treatment group were used to identify farmers to be included in the control group. After interviewing each of the farmers in the treatment group category, this farmer was asked to name some 2-3 farmers they knew in their community who usually did not produce purposefully for the market, but rather sold directly to consumers in the market, or took their produce to the market in the hope of finding the best price of the day.The contacts of such farmers were obtained, and these formed the sample from which the 50 non-participating (control) farmers in the banana value chain were selected. If the selected respondent was not available for the survey, the next one on the list was interviewed as a substitute. Similarly, half the farmers in the control group were women.Below is a description of the respondent sample collection for the treatment and control groups for fish farmers.Farmers participating in the inclusive fish value chains were already predetermined in the research proposal. These were the aquaculture farmers that are members of WAFICOS (Walimi Fish Farmers' Cooperative Society). The co-operative started in 2004, and currently has a membership of over 1,000 fish farmers, fish seed producers, breeders, trainers, fish feed manufacturers, processors, input suppliers and researchers. WAFICOS offers various member services, and one of these is to link fish farmers to markets. One successful linkage so far is that between WAFICOS fish producers to Kati Farms (U) Limited. Kati Farms (U) Limited is a fish agro-processing firm that makes fish sausages 5 . Currently the company is a regular supplier of quality fish and fish products to 30 local supermarkets, 23 hotels, as well as several road-side fish vending outlets. The research team already has a close working relationship with the Kati Farms Managing Director.The WAFICOS active fish farmer members constituted the treatment group for this study. These were identified by comparing the list from WAFICOS with fish input dealers' customers. Active members from the WAFISOS membership list formed the treatment sample population of interest. A stratified random sample of 50 farmers, based on gender, was drawn from the list of WAFICOS active members.This consisted of aquaculture farmers that were marketing their fish produce individually i.e. not members of inclusive value chains. A list of such farmers was compiled from the customer lists of fish fry/fingerling dealers. These dealers provided the lists of their customers, who were classified into two -those already involved in the inclusive value chain described as the treatment group and those that are not. The list of farmers that were not involved in inclusive value chains then formed the population from which a stratified random sample of 50 farmers, based on gender was drawn.To avoid erroneous inclusion, double checking was done of the farmers in the control sample by including a question that asked if the farmer was involved in a value chain i.e. producing for an identified customer like a fish trader, fish processor or co-operative organized fish marketing or even direct marketing to customers through catch-your-own fish enterprise. If No, then we proceeded with the interview, and If Yes, the respondent name was noted and removed from the control group sample list.The research was carried out in the same districts as the existing ILRI-led Uganda pig projects (IFAD-EU and Irish Aid funded Smallholder Pig Value Chain projects) under the CGIAR research program on Livestock and Fish in order to create synergies and build on the existing research findings.The process for identifying the project sites for the Livestock and Fish program involved 2 steps: The first was geographical targeting using GIS characterization with a focus on pig population density, poverty levels and market access variables in order to identify districts with potentials for improving livelihoods of the poor through the pig enterprise, and variations in the value chain domains. From the GIS characterization 10 potential districts located in Central, Western and Eastern regions were identified as potential sites for the pig value chain research work, and of these, Masaka District was selected.The marketing channel for grown pigs is largely informal without any contracts and largely comprises 2 types of traders: a) Large traders who purchase pigs from farmers through brokers (who identify and bulk pigs) to transport to other districts or have them slaughtered at Wambizi abattoir or other slaughter slabs for pork retail in urban areas; and b) Small traders who purchase pigs directly from farmers for backyard slaughter and sale of pork to local retail outlets.In selecting the treatment group and control groups, farmers participating in the inclusive pig value chains were those selling largely through channel (a) above -those were identified as the treatment group while those selling through channel (b) above were assigned to the control group. The focus was the district of Masaka in the same sub-counties where the pig value chain project operates i.e. Kyanamukaaka and Kabonera. Lists of all pig farmers in each village and their main market outlets and clients were prepared by the pig co-operative and platform representatives in the respective sub-counties. From the list, a stratified random sample of 50 pig farmers, based on gender, was drawn for the control group, and another 50 for the treatment group.The research process involved four activities as outlined below;Activity 1 of the research involved literature review to identify additional already-tested indicators for factors influencing the participation of smallholder farmers in inclusive value chains. This resulted in a sampling protocol and methods and tools for field data collection.The individual questionnaires had a mix of both close-ended and open-ended questions to gather quantitative and qualitative data on the products being studied and some of the explanatory factors. The questionnaire were also used to gather more subjective data on the perception of smallholder farmers relating to their business, marketing, socio-cultural and policy environments where respondents are asked for their level of approval to certain statements using 5-item Likert scales.Activity 2 of the research entailed conducting focus group discussions and key informant interviews with farmers, the respective value chain actors and local knowledge holders in the study area. These preliminary interviews deepened our understanding of any local factors influencing inclusiveness of smallholder farmers and power relations within the value chains so as to add those indicators. A sample of the questionnaire used is in Appendix 4.Activity 3 of the research consisted of sampling of respondents: 50 smallholder farmers involved in an organized value chain with an agribusiness for the product under study for three of the selected value chains -fish, banana and pigs (50 farmers x 3 value chains = 150 farmers) and 50 smallholder farmers not involved in an organized value chain to sell their product, or currently not selling the product under study (50 farmers x 3 value chains = 150 farmers). The sampling procedures took gender into consideration. After pre-testing the questionnaires on six smallholder farmers, comprising 2 farmers for each of the three value chains (one involved in inclusive value chains and another as control), 300 individual smallholder farmers were interviewed in total through individual surveys. The data collected was entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using IBM SPSS.Activity 4 of the research involved data analysis using logit regressions. Logit regression is a common statistical tool that allows the identification of factors explaining the probability of the binary distribution of a variable (in this case: involved in inclusive value chains or not). A workshop was organized for the research team to work together on data analysis and writing of the report.Below are some indicators for factors that have a potential to influence participation of smallholder farmers in inclusive value chains. These were taken from past research experiences of ILRI experts. The factors included: Level of education of the farmer  Financial resources of the farmer  Existing products produced and other income-earning opportunities  Cash flow  Risk taking capacity  Farming and farm management skills  Land tenure and security  Other socio-economic factors affecting ability to comply with business relationship.  Yield expectations and availability of cost-benefit analyses: Organization of farmers in formal or informal groups. Location with respect to commercial buyer's premises.  Suitability of soils and climate, access to water, potential impact on environment  Type of product supplied through the value chain.  Quantities required by the buyers, price fluctuations commonly experienced.  Ease of access to support services and inputs.  Government infrastructure provision and policies.  Contracts.  Client relationshipsQuantitative data was collected using the individual respondent questionnaires (see Appendix 2). Responses were captured onto a questionnaire form and entered into the computer. On completion of data entry, the captured data was converted into the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS), which was the main data analysis support tool.Focus Group Discussions -FGDs, and Key Informant interviews -KIs were the main sources of qualitative data. During qualitative data collection, field notes were taken during the KI interviews and FGDs based on the guide questionnaire in Appendix 3.The notes from the various respondents/meetings, and response were compiled. A summary of key messages and themes were identified as well as the explanations/arguments given. By comparing and correlating the qualitative and quantitative data. On that basis, suitable conclusions and recommendations were made.Some of the questions in the qualitative and quantitative data collection tools required the respondents to make estimates and to use their memory as many farmers do not usually keep farm records. This affected their ability to provide accurate responses to some questions and hence the data accuracy. Therefore the findings of this study may be limited to the extent of the ability of the respondent to answer consistently deriving from his estimates and memory.3. Results Presentation, analysis and discussionThe survey of pig farmers covered 100 farmers of whom 50 were involved in inclusive value chains and 50 were not. Table 3.1 is a summary of the selected demographic characteristics of the households surveyed.Below is a presentation of the characteristics and observations of the pig farmer data as well as their general behavior in relation to their pig enterprises.  Pig farmers did not depend on piggery alone for income. Most (65%) of them were also engaged in crop farming, some were either salaried employees of self-employed (30%). Many farmers ranked it as either the second or third (92%) most important source of income.  Most (73%) of the pig farmers own their land as Kibanja owners. Under this tenure system, they have full rights on the land they own although they do not hold land titles. A few (18%) have titles to their land while the rest (19%) rent their land for Ushs 10,000-30,000 per month. Survey results also showed that the male household head owned the land in almost all cases. The land sizes farmed are small. 23% of the farmers had less than 1 acre; 74% of them had 1-3 acres; while 6% had more than 3 acres.  On gender involvement in the piggery enterprise at household level, we observe that although men are important players, women were more involved than men in the piggery enterprises at home as shown in the Table 3.2. It is also notable that women were quite involved in pig farming, marketing and sale, as well as decision making in spending the proceeds from pig sales.  Pig farmers are usually smallholders. About 90% of them had sold no more than five pigs in the past year (last 12 months) and they usually sold one animal at a time.There are periods of high and low demand for pigs. The high demand usually coincides with the festive seasons of the Easter (March-April) and Christmas/end of year (November-January). Sales also go up in times when schools are about to open for the new term, that is January to February; and July to August. The proceeds at this time usually go into paying school fees.  And indeed farmers usually sell their pigs to meet household needs like school fees and essentials, and for emergencies like medical attention. A few (19%) mentioned that they are involved in pig farming as a business. Some sell their animals when they do not look healthy or when curling. The majority (60%) of farmers sell mainly to the nearby butcheries. Some sell to pig traders/agents (15%) while others (24%) sell to individuals and fellow farmers.  Pig farmers are usually price takers. 37% of the farmers indicated that they had received Ushs15,000-90,000 per animal; 53% had received between Ushs. 100,000-200,000; while some 10% had received between Ushs.220,000-400,000. Payments are all made in cash.  In the pig business, animal purchasing is normally done at the farm gate and the buyer is responsible for transporting his animal to its destination. Pig farmers spend most of their income on food, school fees, medical attention and clothing. Table 3.3shows distribution of household expenditure.  The tables also shows that at the household level, although men usually take the lead in some of the key expenditure items like school fees, women also play a significant role in providing food, medical attention and clothing for their households. The various inputs farmers need included -Cash to purchase the inputs, feeds, veterinary services, veterinary drugs, green fodder supplied from their gardens, extension services, water, and shelter for the animals.Five channels were identified through which farmers sell their animals, namely;Channel 1 -These are locally based pig traders who consist of individuals, middlemen or agents of other traders. They may hold on to the animals bought for a few days before selling it on to a bigger trader.Channel 2 -are the regular butcheries in the locality, such as trading centre, drinking areas and restaurants, where pigs are slaughtered in their backyards and sold on to the final consumers. In addition to selling fresh meat, local butcher may also operate small restaurants where pork is prepared as roasted or deep-fried meat ready to eat. Channel 4 -these are farmers who may buy an animal from a fellow farmer for fattening or for breeding purposes.Channel 5 -consists of the NGOs and government programs operating in the area. These usually buy pigs from local farmers for redistribution to other farmers and animal multiplication schemes.Below are the highlights of the pig farmer market interactions;Medium sized sows and finishers make up for most of the sales. They go for average price ranging between Ushs 100,000 to 250,000 per animal in channel 1 and Ushs 70,000 in Channels 2 and 3.Channel 4 buyers pay an average price of Ushs 30,000 for piglets. However farmers are at times forced to sell at a lower price when they are desperate for cash. Such cases include domestic emergencies, shortage of feeds and disease outbreaks. In such cases the farmers may sell off animals to avoid losing them.There is no standard method of grading or weighing animals. The traders/buyers determine the price to pay the farmer arbitrarily, depending on the visual appearance of the animal. The premium price for good quality may reach Ushs 350,000 if sold to urban traders, farmers and NGOs. Under proper management the weight of the animal should match its age and this is usually related to a proper feeding regime. However in many instances the farmers cannot afford to feed the animals adequately to reach their full potential. Some of the quality attributes buyers consider include;Weight and height. Buyers usually prefer an animal that has put on good weight. A taller animal is usually preferred as it is perceived to have less fat and leaner meat.Breed. Some traders prefer the exotic breeds because they potentially have tender meat and are less fatty. Some traders prefer local breeds. Some farmers consider skin colour as a proxy for animal breed. Farmers however noted that there were no reliable sources of good animal breeds nor breeding programmes where they could get marketable breeds.Physical health of the animal is important. Many buyers prefer good looking healthy animals, although some are indifferent. The condition of the sty is also a quality attribute because buyers relate better looking sties to animal quality. It was observed that only local butcheries and urban traders did not buy animals from areas suspected to have outbreaks or animals that are too fat or too thin. Local butcheries normally reject very fatty animals.Swine fever outbreaks are common and these usually wipe out the entire stock. Unfortunately such outbreaks are common and measures such as animal movement permits and quarantines are weak. Other common diseases include intestinal worms, skin diseases and wounds, foot rot, common fevers and respiratory diseases. Farmers usually keep basic antibiotics and deworming drugs at home as well as herbs as the first line of treatment. In cases where symptoms persist they may either sell off the animal for slaughter or call in a veterinary service provider.Veterinary service providers usually take the form of a Veterinary technician. Institutionally there is one veterinary doctor assigned to a sub-county by the district for extension services and all animal health services as well as meat and pork inspection. There is thus a personnel shortage and to fill the void there are also many unqualified personnel offering services to farmers in the absence of qualified veterinary doctors. This casts doubt on the quality of the service and the drugs provided. There are no standard prices for animal treatment and fees are arbitrarily set at Ushs 1000 to Ushs 5000 per animal visit.Because of the high risk involved in piggery, there are no financial institutions that are will lend to pig farmers. Farmers cope with the funding challenge by obtaining personal loans. The interest rates charged are in the range of 36% p.a. and payments are scheduled to be made weekly.The challenges in the pig sector arise from the fact that the sector is not well developed to attract suitable players to smoothen operations throughout the value chain. Organizations such as NGOs, research, development projects and line ministries of the Central government play limited supporting roles in various nodes of the value chain. Thus farmers encounter structural challenges right from production to the time of selling their animals. Traders too encounter similar challenges in bringing the product to the final consumer. Production is dominated by small scale farmers each with just a few animals (less than 5), although there are some other with over 10 animals. We also observed that nearly all the farmers were involved in other agricultural activities with piggery being one of them. These observations suggest that investment and prioritization of piggery by farmers is low. It was also observed that pig value chain players at all levels are disjointed. There is weak coordination in the pig value chain with few actors engaged in some form of formal or informal contractual arrangements. Animal feeding is one of the main constraints in smallholder pig production systems, largely due to the cost. For example, the cost of commercial pig meal is in the range of Ushs 3,000 per kg. The availability and price of feeds are also affected by seasonal variability as well as quality of feeds. The situation is not helped by the lack of skills to develop nutritionally balanced low cost rations and fodder-based diets by the farmers. The common planted fodder is potato vines which are not sufficient in terms of nutritive value and are highly susceptible to destruction by drought. And indeed in the extended dry seasons farmers are forced to sell off their animals because they cannot afford to feed them. Some farmers try to supplement their feeds with swill feeding, by feeding animals on kitchen left overs. However depending on the feeds source, these feeds carried the risk of potentially transmitting African swine fever. Also being in the rural areas, farmers experienced challenges in availing enough water to the animals especially in the dry seasons. Availability of veterinary services was also a notable challenge. Farmers observed that veterinary service costs were high. Farmers also noted that the quality of both the veterinary drugs and personnel was doubtful. Farmers also expressed challenges in animal husbandry, pig health and poor housing and lack of knowledge on good management practices. African Swine Fever was the highest risk disease that farmers feared. Other diseases included parasites and helminthes which are common parasites. The breeding challenges identified by farmers included abortions and low piglet survival. Farmers also mentioned that they do not have reliable sources for obtaining good quality breeding animals. As a result farmers buy piglets from each other or hire a boar from a neighbor to service their sows. Farmers indicated that there are locally available buyers for pigs. However they felt that the buyers do not offer competitive prices. Furthermore, most pig farmers sell their pigs at about the same time when they require cash e.g. festive periods and during the time to re-opening of schools leads to an over-supply thereby depressing the market prices. In such cases, some farmers do accept any price offered to be able to solve their financial obligations. It was also observed that in order to keep prices low, pig traders operated cartels and colluded in setting prices thereby hindering pig farmers from negotiating for better prices. This challenge is linked to lack of market information on prices, alternative market, outlets and market preferences. Other challenges and risks in the pig value chain included; high cost of labor; lack of extension services; Inadequate capital to operate a piggery business; lack of suitable transport facilities to transport animals to the market, lack of a standard system for grading animals for sale; and animal thefts. In the above 2 cases, the buyer is supporting the farmer with market and credit information. Close observation of the above 2 instances suggest that farmers tend to associate themselves more with the buyers who show interest in their farming business. Such buyers may provide market and credit information that empowers them to improve their product quality and hence a better market price.In addition, the following statements were found to be positively correlated with regards to markets  H3 -\"My buyer buys when I'm ready to sell\"  H6 -\"My buyer pays on time\"  H9 -\"My buyer does NOT reject my product\" This finding suggests that there is a ready standing market for all the pigs available for sale mostly on cash basis.However, the following statement H5 -\"My buyer helps me to obtain credit\" was found to be negatively correlated with the three following statements:  H3 -\"My buyer buys when I'm ready to sell\",  H6 -\"My buyer pays on time\" and  H9 -\"My buyer does NOT reject my product\".These statements are negatively correlated probably because pig farmers do not usually actively search for credit facilities as they normally sell small quantities (one pig at a time) to readily available buyers who pay them cash on sale.In conclusion the above correlations imply that the piggery farmers have a trusted ready market that pays them cash on time which negates the need to look for credit facilities. It also suggests that farmers keep pigs as a form of savings (current asset easy to liquidate). This observation probably explains the high sales farmers mentioned that occur during times of school fees and in the festive periods when they require cash.In developing the regression model, factors that were found not to be correlated were regressed to investigate their influence on the participation of pig farmers into inclusive pig value chains or not. The final model included the following additional variables: From the Table 3.4 we observe that; i. Involvement in a credit group was found to be significantly (p=0.027) influencing involvement in an organized pig value chain.The farmer who belonged to a credit group had 0.25 chances (CI -0. 38 -0.88) of also belonging to an organized pig value chain.ii. Similarly, farmer involvement in a GAP group had significant (p = 0.04) influence and involvement in an organized pig value chain. The farmer who belonged to a GAP group had 0.20 chances (CI = -0.63 -1.02) of belonging to an organized pig value chain.iii. Pig equivalent was the standardization method used to calculate the numbers of pigs sold in the last 12 months, taking into consideration the animal type i.e. sow, boar, gilt and piglet. In calculating the Pig Equivalent, piglet units sold were multiplied by 0.3; boar by 1.2; sow by 1 and gilt by 0.6.The number of pigs sold by a farmer, in the past 12 months was found to be significantly (p= 0.000) influencing involvement of farmers in an organized pig value chain. An increase in the number of pigs sold by 1 unit raised the chances of belonging to an organized pig value chain by 2.90 times (CI=2. 66-3.14).From the regression analysis we observe that farmers who were found to be in a credit or GAP group were less likely to belong to an organized pig value chain. This is probably because credit and GAP groups were formed for other purposes other than pig farming. For example the common credit groups e.g. Bataka Twezike, Munno mukabi were set-up purposely as community self help groups, while other groups were set-up through NAADS and other NGOs for collective extension service delivery, bulking and produce marketing.The results of the regression model further indicate that farmers who had sold more animals tended to look out for bulk market channels, i.e. the urban traders. Urban traders have the capacity i.e. cash to buy large quantities; they have transport means to reach the farmer; and as discussed in the FGDs, the urban traders were less sensitive to the pig quality (size, fatty, age, breed, etc) as compared to the local buyers.The household survey of banana farmers covered 100 farmers. These included 50 farmers involved in inclusive value chains and 50 who were not.Table 3.5 is a summary of the selected demographic characteristics of the households, their general characteristics and behavior in relation to their banana enterprises. Analysis of the banana farmer households showed that: All the banana farmers (100%) ranked the banana crop as their most important source of income. Crops like coffee and cattle rearing were also common sources of income mentioned. Other sources of income included self employment off the farm (21%) and salaried employment (14%).  In the banana value chain, men are more involved in the overall production and management activities as well as decision making compared to the women. What is notable however is that in spite of their involvement in these activities, women do have say in deciding how proceeds from the banana farm will be used; Table 3.6 shows that in 47% of the households surveyed, women made the decision on the use of farm proceeds compared to 53% households where men made the decisions.  The banana yield per farmer is quite varied. Over the past year,14% of the farmers produced up to 100 bunches; 21% of them produced between 100-200 bunches; 11% of them produced 201-300 bunches;5% produced 301-400 bunches; 21% produced 401-600 bunches; and 13% produced between 600-1000 bunches, 15% of the farmers produced between 1,000-2,000 bunches. Banana sales usually increase in the months of November, December, January and February, March and August when production is high and reduce in the months of April, May, June, and July when production is low. Being a perishable, all the bunches that mature must be harvested.This leads to price falls in the months of high production when there is abundant supply on the market.  Bananas are produced for both household consumption and for sale. A greater proportion of the production is sold. 75% of the farmers sell more than half of their production. Banana is a staple crop in Uganda and there are numerous traders of the product due to the high demand. Thus farmers are presented with several options of buyers that include local traders, local markets, and urban traders. There is no standard for grading system for bananas. The price of a bunch of bananas is determined arbitrarily and although prices may vary in the high and low supply seasons, most (81%) of farmers are paid Ushs.7000-10,000 per bunch. Payments are usually made in cash and in most cases; the traders buying from the farm gate do transport their purchases.  The majority (69%) of the banana farmers are small holders owning 0.25-5 acres of land. Some 20% have between 5-10 acres while 11% of them have between 10-30 acres. Although they have property rights over the land, many (75%) do not have land titles.Figure 3.3 shows the major inputs banana farmers need for production and their sales channels.The various inputs farmers need included -Cash to purchase the inputs and labor, advisory services and land. Six channels were also identified through which farmers sell their bananas, namely; Channel 1 -These are urban traders located in the main towns and cities. They usually have a network of suppliers that include farmers, local traders and supply agents. Urban traders usually have ready buyers/retailers that they supply. Urban traders usually have their own trucks that collect the bananas from the farmers and collections centres in the villages.  Channel 2 -are the local institutions in the area like schools and hospitals that prepare meals for their students or patients.  Channel 3 -consists of local consumers. These are usually residents of the local communities and villages that buy from the farmer food for home consumption.  Channel 4 -these are traders in the local trading centres. They usually sell to the local community and travelers/passers-by.  Channel 5 -these are traders who move around the villages, they buy bananas from the farmers and may either sell it to other traders or may find consumers to buy it in the trading centres.  Channel 6 -these are located in the villages, usually operating in makeshift shelters within the communities. The urban trader and institutions usually pay a higher price, followed by the local consumers. These buyers are usually less price sensitive buyers; they buy in bulk and pay a uniform price per bunch. The local markets, bicycle traders and local markets pay lower prices and are quite price sensitive.Using Figure3.2 above as reference, the current typical prices paid for an average sized bunch of banana are Ushs 15000, 10000, 7000, in Channels 1, 2, 3 respectively and Ushs 8000 in Channels 4, 5 and 6. These prices rise and fall by about Ushs 5000 in the high and low price seasons respectively. There is however a gender bias in the market as women tend to be paid lower prices compared to men across all Channels.Size measured arbitrarily is the only grading system in place for bananas. Thus Small, Medium and Large bunches. All traders prefer large sized bunches with big banana fingers as these will fetch a better price from their customers, and will reject very small bunches. Among the traders, a premium price of Ushs 10000 can be paid for a very large bunch. The local institutions will buy any bunch size.Although credit is not common in banana purchases at the farm gate, some farmers have had long standing relationships with their customers. There are therefore isolated instances of farmers selling bananas to urban traders and local institutions on credit. Traders are expected to pay back within a week while schools may take up to a month. Credit to other types of buyers is not common. It was also observed that even where long farmer-buyer relationships exist, there are no formal contracts or agreements. If they exist, they are informal.Challenges and risks in the Banana Value Chain Banana farmers meet several challenges in production and marketing of their produce. Some of the risks and challenges faced include the following; Banana plants are infested by a host of pest and diseases and the most devastating of these is the Banana Bacterial Wilt. The disease spreads very fast and can wipe out the entire plantation if not well managed. Indeed many farmers in Uganda have reported significant losses due to the disease. Although government and several NGO farmer support organizations have been advising and training farmers on management and control of the Banana Bacterial Wilt disease spread, the threat still remains. This challenge is coupled with the low access to plant chemical and pesticides. Farmers usually use cow dung, different forms of compost manure and mulching to preserve soil fertility. However the manure and chemical fertilizers are expensive, for example a 50kg bag of NPK costs between Ushs 150,000-200,000. This is out of reach for an ordinary farmer, also given that loans structured for agricultural production are lacking. In addition to this there is a shortage of labourers to work in the banana plantations, and if found it is expensive. For example, the labour cost of applying cow dung compost manure to an acre of land is Ushs 300,000. All these tend to raise the cost of production. Because of the high demand and ready market for bananas, thefts of the crop from the fields are common. Thus farmers live in constant fear of loss of their produce to thieves.In addition, the geographical area covered during this study is also a cattle zone. Because of the free grazing system still practiced the banana fields are often at risk of destruction by the freely roaming animals. Banana production is mainly suitable for the climatic and soil conditions in western Uganda. And indeed many farmers in the area are finding it a worthwhile business, and would like to expand their plantations. However they face the challenge of limited land available for expansion and if found, the land is expensive. For example an acre of land in Mbarara area is 3,000,000-5,000,000. In spite of the numerous efforts by the Government and NGO extension service providers in training farmers on good agronomical practices, many farmers continue to realize low yields due to inappropriate crop husbandry techniques like thinning, timely weeding, spacing, pruning, among others. Farmers also feel that the training received is inadequate. The changing weather patterns and adverse weather conditions continue to threaten banana farmers. The dry periods are longer than usual, threatening the survival and productivity of the plantations; and at the same time when the rains come they are so heavy and bring along with them storms, floods, lightening and hail stones which all damage crops in the field. At the time of marketing, farmers located deep in the countryside cannot easily access markets where they can get better prices. They do not have the means of transport, a situation that is exacerbated in the wet season when roads are impassable; they therefore end up selling their produce at lower prices to traders and middlemen. However, even when the farmers are able to reach the markets, there are market dues and other forms of taxes awaiting to be paid. The price of bananas tends to fluctuate following the low and high supply seasons. These price fluctuations affect the profitability and planning of the banana farmers. And much as farmers see the value of collective action for example in marketing, the spirit and drive of co-operatives among banana farmers is weak.Diagram 3.4 illustrates the correlated statements made by the banana farmers.Using Pearson's Correlation Coefficient it was found that the following statements were positively correlated:  H1 -\"I get a fair price from my buyer\"  H3 -\"My buyer buys when I'm ready to sell\"  H2 -\"I trust my buyer\"  H10 -\"I'm generally satisfied with my buyer\"But the statements are negatively correlated with:  H8 -\"I do not feel obliged to sell to my buyer\"This correlation suggests that there is a ready market for bananas with buyers readily available to purchase bananas. However, farmers seem to have developed a business strong business relationship with buyers including exchange of information, trust, credit and satisfaction. This can explain that farmers may feel some kind of obligation to sell their bananas to their buyers.Nevertheless, the statements:  H6 -\"My buyer pays on time\"  H4 -\"I call my buyer for market info\"  H9 -\"My buyer does NOT reject my product\"were found to be negatively correlated with statement  H8 -\"I do not feel obliged to sell to my buyer\"This correlation can be explained by the fact that farmers are not obligated to sell to a particular buyer because they are informed about the available markets and traders that readily pay for any banana produce that is up for sale.The above results suggest that some indicators of inclusive value chains (a ready market outlet, trust and fair prices)do exist from the perspective of small householder banana farmers. However, the prevailing banana market is large enough to also readily absorb any available produce.In the regression model, factors that were found not to be correlated were regressed to investigate their influence on the participation of banana farmers in inclusive value chain. The final model also included the following variables:1. Education level of the household head 2. Suitability of soil for banana production 3. Availability of phone networkThe above factors provided a logistical regression model of best fit for the banana value chain with a Chi-Square Value of 41.557 and (p < 0.001). From the table, we observe that: i. The education level of the household head, who is also the main proprietor of the banana enterprise, was found to be significantly (p < 0.001) influencing the involvement in an inclusive Banana value chain. The model shows that a unit increase (years spent in school) leads to 1.31 chance (CI = 1.25-1.38) of involvement in an inclusive value chain.ii. Suitability of the soils for banana production was found to be significantly (p = 0.021) influencing farmer involvement in an inclusive banana value chain. The odds of a farmer who has suitable soils for banana production are 2.50 times (CI = 2.10 -2.89)greater of being in an inclusive banana value chain compared to a farmer with poor soils.iii. Availability of a mobile phone connection of the farm was found to be significantly (p=0.008) influencing involvement of a farmer in an inclusive banana value chain. This is signified by the observation that farmers who have a mobile phone connection on their farm have 2.48 chances (CI = 2. 14 -2.83) of participation in an inclusive banana value chain compared to their counterparts that have no mobile phone connection.The correlation results and regression model show that there is open completion in the banana market; and farmers who are more educated, have suitable land for production and have a mobile phone connection/access are more likely to participate in an inclusive banana value chain.The survey of fish farmers covered 100 farmers of whom 50 were involved in inclusive value chains and 50 were not. Table 3.7 is a summary of the selected demographic characteristics of the households surveyed.Below is a presentation of the characteristics and observations of the fish farmers as well as their general behavior in relation to their fish enterprises.Analysis of the fish farmers showed that; Only 17% of the fish farmers ranked aquaculture as their main source of income. 8% ranked it as the second and the majority 75% of them ranked it as the third to fifth income source. Other sources of income mentioned included crop farming salaried employment and self employment income from the household head. Other  In the aquaculture value chain, men are the predominant players (in over 80% of households) although women involvement (about 20%of households) is also visible. This is probably due to the high investment costs involved in fish farming that are beyond the reach of most women, fish farm sites are usually located far from the homestead that women cannot easily access and the risk of working in water a factor that deters many women. Table 3.8is a summary of involvement in fish enterprise by gender.  Two types of fish are mainly farmed. The majority (85%) of the respondents farm the Tilapia-Oreochromis Niloticus species. 15% farmed the Cat Fish Ictalurus Punctatus species. Over the past 12 months 45% of the farmers had harvested less than 1 ton of fish from their farms. 12% had harvested between 0.1-1.0 tons; 17% had harvested 1.5-2.0 tons 26% had harvested more than 2 Tons. On average more than 95% of the fish is sold off leaving about 5% for home consumption.  Fish farmers mentioned that they sold fish through the following as their main market channels: 52% -local markets; 10% -Co-operatives; 5% -individuals; 9% -local markets; and 24% -urban traders. These findings show that most of the aquaculture fish is consumed locally through local markets, local traders and individuals. Urban traders are also an important channel, and these usually process it for export or sold locally. Co-operatives support farmers by linking them to the markets/buyers.Figure 3.5 illustrates the major inputs fish farmers need for production and their sales channels. The various inputs farmers need included -supplies of fish fingerlings; fish feeds, transportation of produce in refrigerated trucks to markets and specialized aquaculture tools and equipment. Three channels were also identified through which farmers sell their fish, namely; Channel 1 -These are traders, exporters and fish processors located in the main towns and cities. These buyers usually have ready buyers/retailers that they supply, and they have their own trucks to move their merchandise from the farmers. Channel 2 -are buyers in the local markets and nearby trading centres and towns. They may also be individuals buying for home consumption or bicycle hawker operating in the neighborhood. Channel 3 -consists of locally based traders, middlemen and agents. They buy in bulk and sell the stock on to other traders. Consumers: These are usually residents of the local communities and villages that buy from the farmer food for home consumption. Aquaculture fish prices are largely uniform nationwide, irrespective of the buyer. Currently the average farm gate price is Ushs6500 per Kg. The price may however rise to 8500 per Kg in times of scarcity. Aquaculture fish competes with the bigger traditional capture fish market, and hence its seasonal variations. The low price seasons are the rainy weather months of March to May when lake fish supplies increase; and the high price seasons are the dry weather months of December to February and from June to August the time when the fish supplies are low. Payments are also made in cash at the farm gate. Farmers also reported isolated cases where buyers booked their fish and paid for it 2-3 months in advance.There are no set quality standards for fish. However, buyers prefer to buy large size fish that have reached at above 0.5 Kg for Tilapia and 1 Kg for Cat Fish at maturity. Tilapia with a dark shiny black colour is much more preferred, and may fetch a premium price of UShs 5000 above the normal price. Unfortunately farmers do not have the skills, knowledge and capacity to raise their fish to have the desired attributes.Unlike in situations where fish is sold to local markets, the fish is usually sold in bulk to a single buyer. Ideally at harvest time, the fish is removed from the pond or cages in one lot, weighted, paid for and transported through a cold chain. Normally the buyer pays for transportation of their produce. Pond fish farmers unlike the cage farmers have the option of harvesting small quantities at a time, and in case they have to sell to market vendors, the farmer is responsible for transporting his fish to the vendor's outlets. Otherwise anyone buying from the farm gate is responsible for transporting their purchases. Fish is a fast perishable item and must thus be kept and transported through a cold chain.Transportation through a cold chain is one of the biggest challenges fish farmers face as such vehicles are rare and expensive to own or even hire. And still because the aquaculture is not well developed in Uganda, suppliers of fish feeds are few and expensive; and so are the sources of reliable fingerling quality, tools and equipment. The fisheries legal framework also presents challenges for aquaculture farmers.Fish farming has inherent risks to the extent that conditioning the fish natural environment i.e. water, to suit the commercial farming requirements and also maintaining the cold chain necessary to keep the fish fresh from harvest to the final consumer are rather costly undertakings for the ordinary Ugandan fish farmers. And also, because the fisheries sector is largely under-developed in Uganda with still little government support, fish value chain players are very few and disjointed. Thus fish farmers have to fend for themselves to keep their businesses alive by all means. Below are some of the fish farmer challenges; Lack of feeds. Fish have to be fed entirely on formulated feed if they are to reach market weight/size in the scheduled time. However there are very few fish feed manufactures in Uganda. This limits competition in the manufacturing business. In such a situation, farmers have few options to select from for the most competitive supplies -best price, quality, etc. Furthermore, the farmers are not exposed to any knowledge of alternative low cost formulations and guidelines. At the current market price of Ushs 6000 per Kg, commercial fish feeds are very expensive. Many farmers also complained of the quality of the fish feeds. Aquaculture fish competes with capture fish for the same market and buyers, yet the capture fish harvest is much higher. Capture fish will therefore drive the market forces. Comparatively, however, the investment cost for capture fish is very low. Short or abundant supply, and hence the price of captured fish, fluctuates depending at times on weather changes. Unfortunately the buyers pay a uniform price for all fish irrespective of the production method. Thus price fluctuations may lead to losses for fish farmers because they have fixed production costs. In the same breath the market channels for fish are limited. Farmers have to rely on selling to the local market vendors and middlemen, and the few processors in the country, and sell at the prevailing price. Information about linkage to markets and market options is limited which exposes farmers to dealing with middlemen rather than the ultimate buyers. Fish farmers in Uganda hardly receive any extension services due to the shortage of aquaculture experts in the country. In addition, because the sector is largely new in Uganda, so standards have been developed and commissioned as the guiding aquaculture fish production and husbandry policies for Uganda. Many farmers have complained about the quality of the fingerlings they buy. Because they lack skills, they are not able to know the quality of the final fish species, and other characteristics based on the appearance of the fingerlings supplied to them. There have been many cases of farmers complaining about the number of fingerlings received versus the number paid for, the sex of the fish bought etc. in relation to the fish pond size. These factors affect the population in the pond or cage, the quantity of feeds to be given, pond aeration and water flow rates, and ultimately growth rate and final fish size/weight. Farmers lack reliable supplies of fish farming equipment offered at reasonable prices. Such equipment includes-fish cages, fishing nets and oxygen pumps, among others. Expert personnel for fish pond construction are also rare. The maturity period for fish Tilapia-Oreochromis Niloticus and Cat Fish-Ictalurus Punctatus is about 6-8 month. This is along waiting period for most small scale farmers who at the same time have to invest in fish feeds for all that time. This presents a strain on the farmers' cash flow. Furthermore, financial institutions are not willing to lend to fish farmers as the business is perceived to be too risky. Fish farmers especially cage farmers who use the natural water bodies are exposed to the risk of theft of their fish especially at night by the capture fishermen. Malicious acts like poisoning fish ponds have also been experienced in the past. Aquaculture is a high investment venture. The high cost is a hindrance for many farmers who may want to expand and develop their fish farms.Diagram 3.5 illustrates the correlated statements made by the fish farmers. Using Pearson's Correlation Coefficient it was found that among the fish farmers, the following statements were positively correlated:  F 2.1. \"I am aware of the latest production techniques for producing fish\"  G 2.7 \"I am satisfied with the interactions I have with government officials in charge of fisheries\"  F2.2 \"I practice the latest production techniques for producing fish\" This correlation suggests that the kind of interaction fish farmers have with the government fisheries officials is awareness building about the latest fish production techniques and that farmers have adopted the new production techniques taught. In addition to this, the statements;  D2G2 \"Mode of transport to the market\"  D2E2 \"Farmers' marketing channel used in the last 12 months\" are both correlated with  F2.2 \"I practice the latest production techniques for producing fish\" Which suggests that fish farmers who have adopted the latest production techniques tend to use the most appropriate means of transporting their fish produce to the market.The resultant logistic regression model results of best fit showed that involvement in fish inclusive value chain was significantly (Chi Square = 73.91, p-value = 0.000) associated with factors such as rank of Fish farming as household's most important source of income during the last 12 months, Amount of fish harvested, mode of fish transportation, education level and gender of the fish enterprise proprietor. Majority of farmers who gave Rank 1 to fish farming as the most important source of income during the last 12 months were also most likely to be involved in an inclusive value chain. A unit increase in number of rank of fish farming as the most important source of income during the last 12 months led to 0.3 odds of getting involved in an inclusive value chain. i. More educated farmers had lower odds of involving themselves in an inclusive value chain as compared to those who had acquired only up to primary level of education.The findings indicate that a unit increase in number of years spent in school by farmers leads to 0.8 odds of getting involved in an inclusive value chain; this translates as a 0.2 decrease in the likelihood of joining an organized fish value chain. Indeed during the FGD meetings, farmers mentioned that the educated people in most cases are more risk averse, they earn a steady income from other sources (e.g. salaried jobs and businesses) as the primary source of income, and not their farm enterprises. The farms they set-up (whether fish farms or otherwise) provide additional income and are rarely run as serious businesses. Typically, such farmers will hire a caretaker to do the day to day tending, will visit the farm once in a while, and will make decisions on phone. A farmer of this nature is less likely to give the due attention to the business and to participate in an inclusive value chain.On the other hand however, less educated people with fewer income opportunities will view the farming businesses as an important investment and source of income. They will thus strive to run it as a successful business and make the highest returns from it.ii. Farmers who were using better modes of transport to transport their fish produce to the market, like motorcycle, car, pickup or truck had better chances (2.40 times) of involving themselves in an inclusive value chain compared to those who used foot or bicycle. This is likely to be linked to the amount of fish being produced, together with the indicator below.iii. Total fish harvested in the last 12 months significantly influenced farmers' involvement in an inclusive value chain. The model in Table 4.3above shows that farmers who had harvested more than 1,000 kilograms of fish in the last 12 months had 22.95 times chances of getting involved in an inclusive value chain compared to those who had harvested less than 1,000 kilograms of fish in the last 12 months. In addition, enterprises where decision to begin fish farming was by a male had about 9.59 times chances of getting involved in an inclusive value chain compared to those where decision to begin fish farming was by a female.Based on the results of the model therefore, getting involved in fish inclusive value chain can be enhanced through involving male, less educated farmers who consider fish farming highly as a source of income.With regards to the pig value chain it is observed that the pig farmers are predominantly smallholders. The main challenges faced in pig production include high feeding costs which compromises animal growth rate and final gate prices; as well as animal health service provision, poor breeds and breeding. The majority of them sell less than 5 animals per day.Although men are the dominant players in the pig business at household level there is prominence of women involvement in owning, management and selling of pigs. Most of the pigs are bought by locally based buyers, and as such, these buyers present a ready market for pig farmers. The lack of standards on quality assessment and a rewarding system for quality is a major disincentive for investment in quality production and probably involvement of farmers in inclusive value chains.The Logit regression analysis showed that among pig farmers, being a member of a credit or a good agricultural practices (GAP) group makes it less likely to be involved in an organized pig value chain. This surprising finding is explained by the multiple products produced on the same farm. By probing pig farmers further on this issue, it turned out that the credit and GAP groups had been created for their crop enterprise rather than the pig enterprise. Also, the piggery farmers have a trusted ready market that pays them cash on time which negates the need to look for credit facilities. It also suggests that farmers keep pigs as a form of savings. However, farmers that sell more animals tend to have access to the high and lucrative markets. But although urban traders do not guarantee better prices to farmers, collaboration with such traders could better help farmers improve their animal quality.In the banana value chain, it is observed that the majority of banana farmers depend on the crop as their main source of income with more men involved compared to women. Bananas are a major staple food crop that is highly demanded in all major towns of the country. Hence there are numerous traders and consumers ready to buy in any quality and quantity of the produce offered and for cash.Banana farmers are however challenged by the rampant crop pests and diseases, the most destructive of these is the Banana Bacterial Wilt. In spite of the high susceptibility of the crop to pests and diseases, pesticides disease control chemicals, fertilizers and other inputs are too expensive for the ordinary farmer, making banana production rather risky. More importantly however are the effects of climatic change-extended drought, heavy rains, flooding hail stones all severely affect the productivity and survival of banana plantations.The correlation and logit modelling indicated that farmers are generally get fair market prices from their main buyers because they have information on prices. There are numerous buyers who present a ready market and open competition in the market. It was however noted that the availability of a ready market that buys anything offered for sale undermined participation of banana farmers in organized value chains. Ownership of suitable land for banana production, education and availability of a phone network on the farm encouraged farmer participation in inclusive banana value chains. The analysis showed that investing to improve soil fertility and mobile phone connectivity can multiply by 2.5 the likelihood that banana farmers will be part of organized value chains.In the fish value chain, most farmers ranked fish as the second, third or fourth important source of household income. The main Species farmed were Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus) and cat fish (Ictalurus Punctatus).The investment cost of fish farming is high and probably acts as a barrier to entry. Yields are low with most farmers having produced less than 1 ton in the past year. Fish farming is also dominated by men.The main marketing channels for aquaculture fish are local markets and consumers; local traders and middlemen; and urban traders who buy in bulk.The aquaculture value chain is still under developed and thus exposed to a number of risks and challenges that include high cost of feeds with hardly any alternatives for farmers; poor extension service delivery due to shortage of experienced personnel; lack of reliable suppliers of inputs like fish farming equipment, fish fingerlings, etc.; lack of confidence in the breeds and other factors have been identified in hindering development of fish farming.Correlation and logit analyses showed that farmers are quite willing to adopt the latest technology to improve productivity on their farms and that government fisheries officials are the main sources of such information. It was also found that farmers' participation in inclusive fish value chains is influenced by how high the level of importance attached to fish farming is, as a source of household income; and quantity of fish harvested. It is more likely for male farmers who decided to start the fish farm enterprise to be involved in inclusive value chains. Interestingly also, more educated farmers had lower odds of involving themselves in an inclusive value chain as compared to those who had acquired only up to primary level of education. The findings indicates that a unit increase in number of years spent in school by farmers leads to a 0.2decrease in the odds of getting involved in an inclusive value chain. Indeed during the FGD meetings, farmers mentioned that the educated people in most cases will shy away from fish farming which is perceived to be very risky, and they earn a steady income from formal employment.The results of this study allow the identification of the following factors as significant in the increasing the odds of smallholder farmers joining inclusive value chains: Soil fertility (positive impact)  Amount of commodity produced (positive impact)  Level of sophistication of the mode of transport used to reach market (positive impact)  A good mobile phone network (positive impact)  Membership of a credit group (negative impact)  Members of a group on Good agricultural practices (negative impact)  Share of the enterprise in the farm's income generation (negative impact)  Education level of the household head (positive or negative depending on commodity)  Gender (men are more likely to be involved in inclusive value chains) These findings require further research in order to qualify them and to identify the possible reverse effect that being part of an inclusive value chain could have on the variables that were hypothesized as explanatory in this study.In this research identifying the factors influencing successful inclusion of smallholder farmers in modern value chains, we observe numerous bottlenecks,both structural and inherent, that call for increased support for inclusive value chain development in developing economies. In the developing economies, small businesses, whether in trade, services or agribusiness, account for the biggest share of the private sector. They are mostly informal operators edging a living from whatever means available. For example, from this study it was found that the majority of farmers in Uganda are indeed small operating on less than 2 acres per household. Ironically, as part of its overall development strategies, the Government in collaboration with donors, has tended to channel most of its support to specific industries and sectors through a combination of policy measures, ranging from concessionary financing, tax breaks, and provision of trade credit to subsidies, public-private partnerships, and promotion of foreign investment, as evidenced in Uganda's fish sector. Unfortunately, such support is not accessible to the small and micro enterprisesfor structural and other reasons.A business-enabling environment is a critical determinant of positive impacts in value chain development projects. No matter the country or sector context, support from government actors often dictates the extent to which businesses can thrive and grow or stagnate and collapse. Thepig, banana and fish smallholder farmers studied in this research have specific needs that are often neglected in favor of top-down government policies that support medium and large businesses instead. For example, the study results show that investing to improve soil fertility and mobile phone connectivity can multiply by 2.5 the likelihood that banana farmers will be part of organized value chains. These results can help guide government and donor investment within the agricultural production, marketing and natural resources management systems. On the other hand, the fact that the likelihood of farmers joining organized value chains actually decreased with the lesser importance of fish as the main source of household income or with pig farmers' belonging to a GAP or credit group (indicators that farmers were investing in their other productions) is a reminder that the smallholder production systems in developing countries are very much intertwined and no intervention on one part of the system can be considered separately from the rest of the farmers' enterprises. By neglecting such specific needs, smaller enterprises particularly in agriculture tend to remain informal and produce below their growth potential. This will becomes a challenge for agro-based countries like Uganda where over 70% of the population depends on small scale agriculture.Thus inclusive private-sector development requires government reforms that are more aware of and responsive to the needs of smaller, micro, and informal businesses throughout the market because the reforms currently do not take their perspectives into account. For donor organization engaged in value chain development, understanding the role of government and ways to increase its participation and the quality of its support in such work is crucial to reach sustainable, positive impacts.In failing to view the market system holistically, government policy reforms can exclude such smallerinformal businesses. This presents a missed opportunity, as the informal sector and small and micro businesses often constitute a significant proportion of the economy, presenting an opportunity to achieve more impact on poverty alleviation at the grass-roots level.It is prudent therefore for both governments and donors to promote inclusive business models, as such models tend to sustain the development and uptake of more structured companies in the respective countries and abroad.In order to have a more inclusive development impact, it is crucial that donor support and government reforms become more open to, and supportive of, small, micro, and informal businesses throughout a value chain. In such an approach businesses maintain their for-profit nature, while contributing to poverty reduction by including low-income communities in their value chains. Who provided money for the expenses?(1. Male or 2. Female)Who decided when to spend?(1. Male or 2. Female) Farmer perception on buyer satisfaction with respect to quantities supplied during the high season: D/11.3 \"I have negotiated some of the terms of the contract with my buyer before agreeing on it.\" [ _____ ] Indicate if you agree with the statement using: 5-Strongly Agree 4-Agree 3-Undecided 2-Disagree 1-Strongly Disagree D/11.4 \"I am satisfied with the contractual arrangement I have with my buyer.\" [ _____ ] Indicate if you agree with the statement using: 5-Strongly Agree 4-Agree 3-Undecided 2-Disagree 1-Strongly Disagree D/11.5 \"In case I feel my buyer has not respected the terms of the contract, I know the person I should go to talk to help solve the problem\". [ _____ ] Indicate if you agree with the statement using: To examine:the composition of the value chain, including the main actors, services, and enablers, the main market channels and their relative importance and requirements, and geographical spread, to visualize linkages and demonstrate interdependencies in the chain the major sources of inputs and services and their accessibility to different types of producers the relative access to and control over the different market channels and services by men and women respectively major constraints in selling products and buying inputs and accessing services"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2980807711.json b/main/part_2/2980807711.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8605e524096073e9bc75fd36e21592545a673f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2980807711.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"22c3cbef913da681508367e925a79b59","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4f05a9a4-cec6-4607-be03-0cb44e24c297/retrieve","id":"-1778124662"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4ee0a5aa-5ab2-4b90-ad71-91161367398a","content":"• Taking a broader systems perspective is imperative when introducing a new technology.• Sing the terms 'improved' and 'weed' indiscriminately -and without properly understanding the multiple benefits farmers derive from cultivating their plots -can be highly misleading. • Progressive experimentation, starting from the existing indigenous practice, leads ultimately to greater efficiency e.g. allocating land systematically to both grain and forage production enhance adoption and wider scaling.1. To compare whole plot productivity of traditional and improved faba bean growing practices. 2. To examine the benefits of managing faba bean / forage intercrops to increase total plot productivity and produce quality forages.• Action research with farmers for stepwise intensification; comparing traditional and improved practices, screening competition tolerant varieties, intercropping selected faba bean varieties with improved forage crops.• The traditional practice involved one late 'weeding' whereas improved management practice two 'weedings' which generated insignificant quantities of forage. • Grain and straw yields were slightly higher under the improved than the traditional management practice and vice versa for forage biomass. • The opportunity costs associated with the loss in weed biomass when the improved practices were adopted were not adequately offset by the economic gains from increased grain yield and crop residue biomass (VCR was less than 2). • Intercropping appears to be economically feasible to provide both grain for the household and feed for the household's livestock (Fig 3).• The pathway to successful intensification of the faba bean-based mixed farming system appears to revolve around choosing competition tolerant varieties of bean alongside forage combinations that optimize the production of grain for human consumption, feed for livestock whilst improving income generation and nutrition.• The faba bean / forage intercropping intervention is scalable in the highland areas of the southern region of Ethiopia where the traditional practice is dominant and already accepted by the communities. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/2995292908.json b/main/part_2/2995292908.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ee0eee58286f744a014f54021229338384f804c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/2995292908.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"45fca511e48a67d0f4bed369339c7fb9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/22353fa0-f1a9-4511-9c49-4443bb39301a/content","id":"-1767808954"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0e793b76-b5eb-4d07-b16e-a1924548c6ba","content":"Annual gain: 1.63% (Attila= PBW343) and 0.72% (Local Checks) CIMMYT Wheat Breeding Priorities Core traits -High and stable yield potential -Durable resistance to Rusts-Stem (Ug99), Stripe and Leaf -Water use efficiency/Drought tolerance -Heat tolerance -Appropriate end-use quality -Enhanced Zn and Fe content for nutrition (nutritional quality) Key diseases in specific environments Durable resistance to diseases and pests  Septoria tritici blotch  Spot Blotch  Tan Spot  Fusarium -head scab and myco-toxins  Karnal bunt  Root rots and nematodes  Wheat blast-new threat in SA Packaging multiple traits together is essential under climate change scenario to benefit wheat farmersPossible entry points for GS in the CIMMYT wheat breeding programs 1) Predicting the performance of lines that have never or insufficiently been phenotyped2) Reducing the cost of yield trails 3) Separate parental selection from product advancement by estimating breeding values (gBLUPs) as well as performance BLUPs 4) Rapid cycle selection: Cross -predict -repeat 5) Enrich elite germplasm with new genetic variation, select best candidates of wild relatives to be used as parentsImproving genome-wide prediction ability in CIMMYT wheat datasets• Large genotypic, phenotypic and environmental CIMMYT datasets became available• Genome-wide prediction models have been developed or adopted from other research fields throughout the years -------------------------- ✓ Work is underway to expand genomic predictions for parental selection in earlier breeding generations to shorten the breeding cycle and for multi-environment testing across the South-Asian phenotyping network ✓ Breeder are still skeptical using GS, additional validation is required to build more confidence in using GS at different levels in breeding programs"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3013226485.json b/main/part_2/3013226485.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d6f71908ec5355cca3c92dfbe0f7bb0de28bcf3 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3013226485.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4531a923a6e8a865c9ebf0d185dbd087","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10460-013-9425-y.pdf","id":"-798425850"},"keywords":["Urban agriculture","Food security","Dietary diversity","Social capital","Kibera slums","Kenya"],"sieverID":"5a41012c-544d-4c7b-b66b-f20147c0f2a2","content":"Much of the developing world, including Kenya, is rapidly urbanizing. Rising food and fuel prices in recent years have put the food security of the urban poor in a precarious position. In cities worldwide, urban agriculture helps some poor people gain access to food, but urban agriculture is less common in densely populated slums that lack space. In the Kibera slums of Nairobi, Kenya, households have recently begun a new form of urban agriculture called sack gardening in which vegetables such as kale and Swiss chard are planted into large sacks filled with topsoil. This paper examines relationships among sack gardening, social capital, and food security in Kibera. We used a mixed methods approach, combining qualitative interviews with a household survey, as well as focus group discussions with both farmers and non-farmers. We present evidence that sack gardening increases social capital, especially for those households that undertake sack gardening in groups. We also find that sack gardening in the Kibera slums has a positive impact on household food security by improving household dietary diversity and by reducing the need to resort to painful coping mechanisms that are used during food shortages.The first decade of the twenty-first century marked a major shift in the distribution of the world population. For the first time, the number of people living in urban areas outnumbered those in rural areas. Current estimates suggest that by 2030 the world will be over 60 % urban, with most urbanization taking place in developing countries (UN Habitat 2003). Kenya is one such rapidly urbanizing developing country. With urbanization, the proportion of the urban population living below the poverty line continues to rise. Currently between a third and a half of Kenya's population live in urban areas, but by 2020 more than half of Kenya's poor population is expected to be urban. Levels of urban poverty continue to deepen, as the percentage of urban dwellers in the poorest categories, those considered to be 'food poor' and 'hardcore poor' 1 continues to rise (Taylor and Goodfellow 2009). Urban poverty can be particularly debilitating because while the rural poor are often able to obtain or produce their own basic needs such as food, water, and shelter, the urban poor become increasingly dependent upon the cash economy to obtain these goods, rendering them more vulnerable. More than half of Kenya's total 'food poor' live in slum environments, where the poorest urban dwellers may spend up to 80 % of their total income on food (Taylor and Goodfellow 2009). Rising food and fuel prices in recent years have made it increasingly difficult for the poor to afford food (Erulkar and Matheka 2007;IRIN 2009;Satterthwaite 2004).While food insecurity historically was viewed as a result of inadequate agricultural production and food supply at the regional or national level, Sen (1981) showed that a household's food security status depends on its ability to access food by producing or purchasing it with its own assets. Deveraux and Maxwell (2001) characterize the causes of food insecurity in Africa in this way as well. Recent literature characterizes household livelihood strategies as an effort to combine different assets, or capital types, including financial capital and human capital but also natural capital (e.g., soil and water), physical capital (e.g., machines or tools), and social capital (social relationships that support productive efforts) (Bebbington and Perreault 1999;Swift and Hamilton 2001).In this paper we examine urban agriculture as part of livelihood strategies in the Kibera slums of Nairobi, Kenya. In densely populated Kibera a new form of urban agriculture called sack gardening has spread during the last several years, with farmers planting kale and Swiss chard 2 in sacks filled with soil. 3 Urban agriculture can be an important part of an urban livelihood strategy; various studies have demonstrated that it can have some impact on household food security, either by providing an additional income source, increasing dietary diversity, or helping to protect against seasonal unavailability in the food supply (Maxwell et al. 1998;Vall and Shalizi 2006). An early study of urban agriculture in Nairobi (Freeman 1991) found that although active urban farmers were often part of the upper or middle class, farming by the urban poor was particularly important as it was frequently used to supplement household food consumption rather than as a business venture.Within the context of the livelihood framework we focus in particular on interactions between urban agriculture and social capital as they contribute to food security. Social capital encompasses the social resources on which people rely when pursuing their livelihoods, including social networks, membership in groups, relationships of trust and reciprocity, and access to wider institutions of society (Rakodi 2002). Social capital can enable households to become urban farmers, helping them gain access to needed supplies and allowing them to work together for increased efficiency and security. Participating in urban agriculture can also influence a household's social capital. This relationship could be positive, for example if households work together as farmers and build stronger relationships, or it could conceivably be negative if a household farms alone, becomes more food secure, and neglects ties with neighbors who have become less important in the household's livelihood strategy. We will explore such relationships below. Social capital in turn can have other effects on food security independent of urban agriculture, for example by having people to turn to in times of need, or contacts through whom to gain employment (Swift and Hamilton 2001).Following this introduction we briefly review the literature on urban agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa and then we present a conceptual framework for examining the interaction of urban agriculture and social capital in contributing to household food security. We introduce Kibera, present our research methods, and then report our findings regarding the contribution of sack gardening to household food security and the interaction of sack gardening and social capital. We find that sack gardening in Kibera has positively impacted household food security by improving household dietary diversity and reducing the need for various coping mechanisms that are used in times of food shortages. We also find that sack gardening increases social capital among farmers.Urban agriculture in Kenya and elsewhere in Sub-Saharan Africa Urban agriculture is a feature of most if not all cities in sub-Saharan Africa, but the literature on urban agriculture is of relatively recent origin. People have been farming in African cities since these cities were born; however, colonial and post-colonial governments often discouraged or outlawed the practice of urban agriculture because it did not fit with their conceptions of modern cities. This resulted in very little attention to urban agriculture and little formal support.Urban agriculture generally plays a smaller role in providing food security in very dense informal settlements such as Kibera with a shortage of land for farming (Crush et al. 2011). This has changed, however, with the recent advent of sack or vertical gardening. By planting vegetables into both the top and sides of sacks, farmers in Kibera can grow a large number of vegetables in the small spaces available to them (Fig. 1). Sack gardening has been practiced in a limited way for many years, but since 2008 it has spread greatly due to the availability of free seedlings and technical advice from a non-profit organization called Solidarite ´s. Farmers, however, must purchase inputs such as fertilizer and water for their sacks, which can be costly for families with limited financial capital. Anecdotal evidence suggests that sack gardening in Kibera has had a positive impact on household food security.Early studies of urban agriculture in Kenya were mostly descriptive in nature, focused on documenting who was involved in urban crop and livestock production and the ways in which urban agriculture contributed to household food security. These early studies clearly showed that agriculture was an important part of the urban landscape with a third or more of households practicing some form of agriculture (Egziabher et al. 1994;Freeman 1991;Maxwell 1995;Mwangi 1995).The urban landscape of Kenya has changed greatly over the past two decades, with rapid urbanization and an increase in the population of the urban poor. It is now more important than ever to understand the contributions of urban agriculture to household livelihood strategies and food security, because many of the urban poor are unable to afford food, spending up to eighty percent of their household income on food (Maxwell 1996). However, there have been few recent studies on the contributions of urban agriculture to household food security in Kenya. More recent research on urban agriculture in Kenya has tended to focus on the broader contributions of urban agriculture to income generation and household livelihood strategies (Foeken 2006;Foeken and Owuor 2008) or the role of urban agriculture in nutrient waste cycling (Karanja et al. 2010;Njenga et al. 2010).As sack gardening grows in popularity and spreads throughout Kenya, it is important to understand how people are using and potentially benefiting from this type of urban agriculture. Sack gardening has been discussed anecdotally in newspapers and books as being a beneficial activity (Ayieko 2008;Karanja and Njenga 2011;Pascal and Mwende 2009) but there have been no formal studies of its practice nor information about the extent to which it contributes to household food security.A meta-analysis of 49 communities throughout southern and eastern Africa found that increasing poverty and conflict in many communities was linked to a decrease in social coherence and social capital, leading to increasing vulnerability and food insecurity in these communities (Misselhorn 2005). The high levels of food insecurity in Kibera likely reflect the intense levels of poverty and prevalent violence within the Kibera slums, along with a lack of livelihood strategies that allow households to meet their food needs. Urban agriculture is sometimes practiced as a community activity, and if sack gardening were to strengthen relationships among households, it could positively impact household food security beyond just providing an additional food source for the household.Social capital, sack gardening, and food security We examine the relationships among social capital, sack gardening, and food security as characterized in Fig. 2. We suggest that social capital and participation in sack gardening can affect each other, and that each in turn has its separate effects on household food security.First, for a household to engage in sack gardening requires access to materials and inputs, including the sacks, seeds, soil, manure, and water; it also requires space to locate the sacks and the ability to guard them against theft. These requirements can be achieved individually, but for many people they will be easier with the help of others. For example, the NGO Solidarite ´s provides seeds and sacks, so a relationship with Solidarite ´s facilitates participation in urban agriculture. Similarly, topsoil is scarce in Kibera and at times households may obtain it through local organizations, such as churches or mosques. Topsoil is heavy, so transporting it may require assistance from a friend. Perhaps most importantly, space is very limited in Kibera, so much so that some households lack private space even to place a sack. Many households engage in sack gardening in groups using shared space.Second, households that work together in sack gardening may be expected to strengthen relationships with each other, thus building their social capital, particularly if their work is successful. These relationships in turn may enhance a household's livelihood and help it gain greater access to food. On the other hand, one might hypothesize that if a household becomes more self-sufficient in food thanks to sack gardening, it might allow its social capital to weaken due to reduced reliance on social networks to access food. In reality, however, such a situation is unlikely in Kibera, where sack gardens are small and serve more as a way for a household to fill gaps in its food supply rather than serve as a major food source (Karanja and Njenga 2011).Other literature from a range of contexts tells us that building social capital is likely to have wider livelihood benefits. Studies have suggested that higher levels of social capital are related to improved economic development of communities (Midgley and Livermore 1998), decreased crime rates (Sampson et al. 1997), and a variety of positive health outcomes, including improved child welfare and lower levels of teen pregnancy (Putnam 2001). In Ecuador, Bebbington and Perreault (1999) demonstrated that increased social capital was also correlated with improved community access to other important assets such as land, credit, and new technologies.Remarkably few studies have explicitly examined the relationship between food security and social capital. One study of food insecure households in Hartford, Connecticut, USA found that social capital was associated with decreased risk of hunger, even after controlling for various socio-economic factors (Martin et al. 2004). A study in Peru found that families with higher measures of social capital were more likely to be able to obtain food when they needed it (Dı ´az et al. 2002). Given that communities with higher levels of social capital have greater wealth and greater senses of trust and reciprocity, we expected to find that households in the Kibera slums with higher levels of social capital would correspondingly have greater measures of household food security.In our research in Kibera we examine a third relationship more closely: the direct effect of sack gardening on a household's food security. Although sack gardening cannot provide all or even a large proportion of a household's food supply due to its small scale, it can play an important role in allowing access to leafy greens that otherwise would have to be purchased. In this way it can expand overall dietary diversity and the diversity of vegetables consumed, and it can alleviate the need to engage in various coping mechanisms associated with hunger. We examine these effects below.As the largest informal settlement in Nairobi, Kibera characterizes some of the most challenging issues faced by residents in informal settlements in Kenya, and arguably the world, today. Kibera is located about 7 km southwest of downtown Nairobi, within the legal city boundary. It is East Africa's largest slum with approximately half a million residents occupying about 2.5 sq km, making it one of the most denselyFig. 2 Relationships among social capital, sack gardening, and food security populated urban settlements in the world. Kibera is comprised of 10-13 'villages', depending on how boundaries are drawn, many of which are divided along ethnic lines (UN Habitat 2009). For the purposes of this research, we recognized the following 10 villages in Kibera: Makina, Mashimoni, Laini Saba, Soweto East, Lindi, Silanga, Soweto West, Kianda, Gatwekera, and Kisumu Ndogo (Fig. 3).Over half of the households in Kibera live below the poverty line of $1 per day (Erulkar and Matheka 2007), but in reality the number of households experiencing poverty is actually much higher. The income level on which poverty lines are set in Kenya often ignores the cost of non-food essentials in urban areas, such as the cost of water, health care, and education (Satterthwaite 2004). Many poverty estimates are based on a cost of living of $1 per day (80 shillings). 4 While people in Kibera may earn more than 80 shillings per day, this is not nearly sufficient to cover other costs associated with life in the slum. People in Kibera living on $1-2 per day (80-160 shillings) still struggle to pay for the cost of essential goods and services, with family members combining their incomes and borrowing heavily, leaving many families with heavy debt burdens. (Umande Trust et al. 2007). Gulyani and Talukdar (2010) suggest that in reality more than three quarters of the households in Kibera live below the poverty line, when the poverty line is defined based on the urban poverty threshold set by the Kenyan government of 3,174 Kenyan shillings (KSh) per month (USD $40), excluding rent.Many Kibera residents began to garden after the postelection violence of early 2008, and sack gardening is now practiced by upwards of 5,000 Kibera households (personal communication with Solidarite ´s; Karanja and Njenga 2011). The great diversity of the Kibera slums allows comparisons to be made concerning the impact of sack gardening on household food security amongst a wide variety of household structures, income levels, and ethnic backgrounds.The research presented in this paper was part of a larger study conducted during 2010-2011 that examined the impact of sack gardening on farmers' livelihood strategies, household food security, and exposure to environmental risks. 5 Fig. 3 The Kibera slums are located in Nairobi, Kenya. Approximately half a million residents occupy about 2.5 sq km, making it one of the most densely populated urban settlements in the world. Kibera is comprised of 10 villages or neighborhoodsThere is no consensus on the best way to measure social capital because it involves trying to measure social structures and relationships. I t has been measured in a number of different ways in the literature, depending on the scale of interest. At an individual or household level, it is often measured using individual interviews or household surveys, at a community level by using household surveys or focus groups, and at a regional level by using case studies or key informant interviews (Krishna 2002). Measures of social capital need to be culturally relevant, so we chose to focus on exchanges of goods and services between households as well as the quality of relationships people had with their urban neighbors.Measuring household food insecurity can be complicated. A number of methodological approaches are present in the literature, including measuring household production and purchases, measuring food consumption using 24-h recall, or using indirect indicators such as rainfall and marketing data, or anthropometric measurements (Hendriks 2005;Maxwell and Frankenburger 1992). Data for these measures are often time consuming to collect and unreliable. Thus, other types of indicators have been developed to measure household food security. One measure looks at coping strategies that households use when they do not have access to sufficient food (e.g., Maxwell 1996).Coping strategies consist of behavioral modifications such as eating foods that are less preferred, limiting portion sizes, and skipping meals. Our study measured coping strategies used by households using a tool developed by the USAID Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA) (Bilinsky and Swindale 2010) that asks households whether they have used a series of eight different coping strategies over the past year.Another method for measuring household food security involves quantifying the diversity of the diet consumed by household members. Several studies in Sub-Saharan Africa have compared household dietary diversity with other measures of household food security. These studies have found that greater dietary diversity scores are correlated with other measures of improved food security (Faber et al. 2009;Hatloy et al. 1999;Hoddinott and Yohannes 2002). We used a modified version of a tool developed by USAID FANTA to measure overall dietary diversity as well as the diversity of vegetable consumption amongst households in Kibera.We used mixed methods to understand the impact of sack gardens on household food security in the Kibera slums, drawing on qualitative interviews, household surveys, and focus group discussions with farmers and non-farmers (Cameron 2005;Dunn 2005). Farming households were defined as any household currently practicing sack farming, and the farmer was the primary caretaker for the sack gardens. Non-farming households were not involved in any form of urban agriculture at the time of the survey.Preliminary open-ended qualitative interviews were conducted in late 2010 with 31 farmers from Makina and Mashimoni villages within Kibera slums. Farmers were chosen for these interviews using purposive sampling, based on the recommendations of other farmers in the area, with the goal of interviewing people with a wide range of experience in terms of length of time gardening, number of sacks, age, and educational attainment. These interviews were conducted in Kiswahili by the primary author and a field assistant, transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed for key themes using thematic analysis (Waitt 2005). During the interviews farmers were asked about a variety of issues including their farming practices and how they felt that gardening was impacting their ability to feed their families, and the variety of foods they were eating.Information from the preliminary interviews was used to design a survey instrument that we used in a survey of 306 households (153 farmers, 153 non-farmers) in Kibera in early 2011. Households were selected using stratified random sampling of nine villages within the Kibera slums. Although there are ten villages in Kibera, one village (Lindi) was excluded for safety reasons. Local field assistants compiled lists of 40 farmers and 40 non-farmers from each village within Kibera, and 17 farmers and non-farmers were randomly selected for interviews from each village list. The interviews were conducted in Kiswahili by a team of four research assistants, plus local assistants who accompanied the research assistants to the households.In the qualitative interviews and the survey, households were asked various questions related to measures of social capital, including participating in informal or formally registered groups (e.g., religious groups, savings groups, or farming groups), their relationships with their neighbors, and exchanges of goods between rural and urban households. We measured their relationship with their neighbors by asking them to rate the quality of their relationship with their neighbors on a scale of 1 to 4, from 1 = very good (speak every day) to 4 = poor (do not get along). 6 We also asked farmers whether they thought their relationship with their neighbors had improved, stayed the same, or worsened since beginning sack gardening. Exchanges of goods between households were measured by asking whether or not, in the month prior to the interview, their household had exchanged items from a list of different goods and services with their rural relatives, urban relatives, or urban friends and neighbors. Goods and services included items such as cash, cash loans, child care, cooked foods, and harvested foods. We asked first about whether they had given these goods, and the frequency with which they were given, and then about whether they had received them.The household survey used a variety of questions to assess household food security. USAID FANTA has created a set of survey tools designed to use food access as a measure of improved household food consumption (FAO 2003). The first component of these tools measures dietary diversity as a proxy for household food security. We measured dietary diversity using a 24-h food recall, where foods consumed were categorized into one of 15 nutritionally unique food groups.Respondents were asked what they ate at each meal during the previous 24 h, including the ingredients used to prepare each meal. This information was used to quantify which food groups the respondent consumed. A total dietary diversity score was assigned to each respondent based on the total number of food groups consumed. We also compared the number of farmers and non-farmers who had consumed foods in each individual food group. In addition to measuring total dietary diversity, we measured the dietary diversity of vegetables consumed over the previous month. Respondents were asked whether or not they had consumed 17 different commonly eaten vegetables in the past month. They were also asked how frequently they consumed each vegetable, and how frequently during the month they were able to harvest this vegetable from their sack garden rather than purchasing it.The survey also measured elements of coping strategies used by households during times of food insecurity by looking at months of inadequate food access over the previous year.Respondents were asked whether or not they had experienced a series of eight different situations where they lacked access to food, such as worrying about not being able to purchase food, skipping meals, or reducing portion sizes (Gulyani and Talukdar 2010). Respondents were asked if they had ever experienced these scenarios, how frequently they experienced them, and if the children in the household experienced them.Data from the household survey was analyzed using SPSS (Version 15). Using a series of independent t tests and Pearson's correlations, we tested the significance of mean values (at a 95 % confidence level) between farmers and non-farmers for indicators of dietary diversity, coping strategies, and social capital.Establishing causality of relationships is very difficult in the social sciences, and even establishing directionality in statistically significant associations is difficult (Moser and Kalton 1971). For example, a finding that sack gardeners have stronger social capital than non-gardeners would leave unanswered the question of whether stronger social capital facilitated sack gardening or the reverse. In this section we present such associations between measures of a household's social capital and its participation in sack gardening, and between both social capital and sack gardening and well-being as in the model depicted in Fig. 2. We draw on evidence from qualitative interviews to help interpret some of the findings.We begin by describing our sample including demographic characteristics of sack gardeners. We present evidence suggesting that participation in sack gardening is associated with higher social capital, and then augment that evidence from the survey and from qualitative interviews that sack gardening contributes to improved social capital. We then present evidence that social capital is associated with improved well-being including food security, and that participation in sack gardening is associated with greater household food security.In our sample (n = 306), 90 % of the respondents were female and 10 % were male. This reflects that the majority of sack farmers are female, which is consistent with findings on urban agriculture elsewhere in instances when this form of agriculture is primarily a subsistence activity. When urban agriculture is more of a commercial venture, then it is more likely to engage men (Freeman 1991;Mudimu 1996;WinklerPrins and de Souza 2005). Farmers were an average of 5 years older than non-farmers, with the mean age of farmers being 34.5 years and non-farmers being 29.5 years. There was no significant difference in the age of the males and females. The farmers we interviewed had lived in Kibera for a significantly longer period of time (14.8 years) than non-farmers (11.6 years). However, there were more immigrants from rural areas among farmers (86.3 %) than among non-farmers (81 %). In addition, the average family size for farming households (5.15 people) was significantly larger (p \\ 0.001) than for non-farming households (4.17 people). With larger families, households may be more drawn to an activity such as urban agriculture as a source of food to feed more people in their households. Smaller households with younger parents may be less likely to begin farming because they feel they are able to support their families with cash incomes alone. The mean level of education for all respondents was upper primary school.For some farmers, sack gardening is a social activity in addition to being a strategy to improve food security. Fiftythree percent of farmers shared space for their sack gardens with other farmers and 19 % of farmers were members of a formal or informal gardening group. Farmers also reported sharing in other activities, with 42 % of farmers helping each other carry soil for the sacks, 52 % helping to construct the sacks, and 75 % consulting each other about farming issues.Farmers reported having significantly (p = 0.003) better relationships with their neighbors than non-farmers. In Kibera, where it is normal for multiple families to share a single housing block, having a good relationship with neighbors is important for household safety and survival, and is thus a good measure of a person's social capital.Another important aspect of social capital is the variety of exchanges that take place among households. Studies in developing countries have examined exchange networks between urban and rural families, with the assumption that urban families remit cash payments to rural areas, while rural areas contribute harvested goods to urban families (Baker and Aina 1995;Linares 1996;Vall and Shalizi 2006;WinklerPrins 2002;WinklerPrins and de Souza 2005). However, as the population of urban areas grows, the exchange of goods between urban relatives, friends, and neighbors is important as well. Farmers and nonfarmers who were part of our study received goods or services from rural and urban relatives with equal frequency. However, farmers received goods from urban friends or neighbors marginally significantly more frequently (p = 0.086) than non-farmers. Although all households tended to receive the same types of goods from rural areas and from their rural and urban relatives, there were significant differences in terms of the types of goods and services that households received from urban friends and neighbors. Farmers receive harvested goods (vegetables) and information from their neighbors significantly more frequently than non-farmers. Both groups received cash, child-minding, cooked foods, or loans with equal frequency.An interesting finding concerns differences between farmers who undertake sack gardening jointly with their friends or neighbors as opposed to those who do so individually. Farmers who share space for sack gardening nearly always work together with other farmers to carry soil, construct their sacks, and share seedlings for the sacks. These farmers also report getting along better with their neighbors (p = 0.006) than farmers who farm individually. Farmers who share space for their sack gardens are also significantly more frequently to be part of an informal gardening group (p = 0.007) or another type of formal group (p \\ 0.0005). Additionally, farmers who farmed individually exchanged goods and services with their rural and urban relatives or urban friends no more frequently overall than non-farmers. These findings suggest that the act of working together as sack gardeners is what is most closely associated with measures of social capital as opposed to sack gardening per se.We were unable to obtain data on how much private space for sack gardening each respondent had access to, but we did find farmers who share space more frequently have a smaller number of sacks than those who farm individually (r = -0.141, p \\ 0.07). This may signify that farmers who share space do so because they lack space of their own, but this correlation is significant only at the 10 % level. Similarly, we found a weak negative association between household income 7 and some aspects of working together in sack gardening. A household's reported income was negatively and statistically significantly associated with consulting with others (p \\ 0.0005), constructing sacks, (p = 0.028), sharing seeds (p = 0.36), and carrying soil (p = 0.06), but curiously it was not correlated with sharing space.The evidence in the previous subsection only demonstrates a positive correlation between sack gardening and social capital. Evidence also suggests that sack gardening contributes to improved social capital. Farmers reported having significantly (p = 0.003) better relationships with their neighbors than did non-farmers. While the previous section demonstrated that farmers who were part of a group had strong relationships with their neighbors, even individual farmers had a significantly better relationship with their neighbors than non-farmers (p = 0.001), which may result from sharing vegetables from their garden with their neighbors. In addition, 32 % of farmers reported that they now interact with their neighbors more frequently than they did before they began sack gardening.During the qualitative interviews, many farmers reported that sack gardening had strengthened friendships or cooperation amongst people in Kibera. Some farmers felt gardening was beneficial because they were now able to share their vegetables with their friends, while others worked together with others by giving them extra seedlings, helping each other carry soil or build sacks, or by pooling money to buy fertilizer and pesticides. Sack gardening has helped to create a sense of community because it has given people reasons to talk with their neighbors. Thirty-two percent of farmers reported that they now interact with their neighbors more frequently than they did before they began sack gardening. They buy water from each other, consult with each other about problems, and create employment for each other. Sack farming has been a way to bring the women of certain neighborhoods together. As one farmer explained, ''Sack gardening brings women together… If it weren't for my kale, I wouldn't have a reason to talk to them… I would only talk to my customers. Now we buy water from others, creating employment and a sense of community here in Kibera.'' Compared to those who farm alone, people who share space for sack gardening report more frequently that their relationships with neighbors have improved since they began sack gardening, though the correlations are only significant at the 5 % level (p = 0.046). 8Studies elsewhere suggest that social capital contributes to economic development and household food security (e.g., Krishna 2002). Given that our data suggest that sack farmers have higher levels of social capital than non-farmers, we then explored the relationship between social capital and food security for farmers and non-farmers, looking at the exchanges of goods between households and their friends and relatives, as well as a respondent's relationship with their neighbors. Not surprisingly, both farmers and non-farmers more frequently reported receiving goods or services from their urban friends or neighbors if they reported having a good relationship with their neighbors. Farmers who reported that their relationship with neighbors had improved since beginning sack gardening reported receiving information (p = 0.026), labor for agriculture (p \\ 0.000), and cash loans from their neighbors (p = 0.061) significantly more frequently than other farmers. Receipt of cash loans is particularly important because it demonstrates an increase in trust between the farmer and their neighbors, thus improving their social safety net as a result of sack gardening.The exchange of goods between households, particularly between urban friends and neighbors is related to improved household food security. Farmers and non-farmers who reported having a better relationship with their neighbors more frequently gave goods or services. Farmers with good relationships more frequently gave cash (p = 0.048), cooked foods (p \\ 0.000), and loans (p \\ 0.000) than other farmers, while non-farmers with good relationships more frequently gave cash loans (p \\ 0.000) or cooked foods (p \\ 0.000) than other non-farmers. Among farmers who reported an improved relationship with their neighbors since beginning gardening, they also reported significantly more frequently giving their friends and neighbors child care (p = 0.015) or labor for agriculture (p = 0.027). This indicates a greater sense of trust and cooperation between these households and their neighbors. Those who received a wider variety of goods from their urban neighbors significantly less frequently reported being unable to eat what they wanted (p = 0.053), eating a limited variety of foods (p = 0.037), eating reduced portion sizes (p = 0.065), and eating a reduced number of meals (p = 0.052).To summarize the overall findings of this section, households with more social capital were more food secure than those who had less social capital. This suggests that neighbors provide a basic support system that prevents households from going without at least some food in times of need. People who participate in sack gardening were shown to have greater social capital than those who did not, possibly because of the opportunities that gardening creates for socializing and sharing with other people. In this sense, gardening contributes more to food security than just the food harvested from the garden. It helps to create a social network that shares food so that people do not find themselves in situations where they need to rely on coping strategies such as reducing portion sizes or skipping meals.In terms of food security, there was a significant correlation between people who have a positive relationship with their neighbors and whether or not they were worried they would run out of food (see Table 1). Respondents who had good relationships with their neighbors were less likely to be worried about running out of food, and they were also less likely to reduce the number of meals they eat. Farmers whose relationship with their neighbors had improved since beginning sack gardening less frequently reported being unable to eat the foods they want (p = 0.035), eating reduced portion sizes at meals (p = 0.041), or finding themselves with no food in the house (p = 0.002). In addition, farmers who reported sharing harvested goods with their urban neighbors were less likely to eat a limited variety of foods. However, this relationship was not true for respondents who received harvested goods from their neighbors.We examine effects of sack gardening on food security in terms of overall dietary diversity, diversity of vegetable consumption, and ability to avoid using painful coping mechanisms to manage food scarcity.We measured overall dietary diversity and diversity of vegetable consumption among farmers and non-farmers in the Kibera slums using the USAID FANTA Index. We found no significant difference in overall dietary diversity between the farming and non-farming households, all of whom consumed an average of 6.4 unique food groups in the 24 h prior to the survey. Amongst the respondents of this survey, there was no significant correlation between dietary diversity and household wealth, the amount of money people spent on food, or the percentage of their income spent on food. There are several reasons why any potential increases in food security that may result from gardening would not show up in an overall dietary diversity index. First, food harvested from sack gardens would be classified only in the category of 'dark leafy green vegetables', which is a category of food that is eaten by most households in Kibera on a regular basis. Second, farmers who reported selling their crop to purchase other food items purchased larger quantities of commonly eaten foods, such as maize flour to make ugali, the staple starch, rather than purchasing food from a different food group, such as meat or fish.In terms of individual food categories, there were few differences between farmers and non-farmers in terms of their consumption. The two exceptions were that farmers significantly more frequently reported consuming green leafy vegetables than non-farmers (p = 0.033) and marginally significantly more frequently reported consuming fruits (p = 0.090). People who naturally consume more fruits and vegetables may be more inclined to plant gardens, or people who plant gardens may have easier access to these vegetables and thus be more inclined to eat them. Non-farmers consumed significantly more seafood (p = 0.023) than farmers, which suggests they may have been consuming omena (small dried fish) in place of kale or Swiss chard with ugali (a maize meal porridge).Leafy green vegetables are central to the diet of households in Kibera. A typical meal consists of ugali, served with some type of leafy green vegetable (fried or boiled) and a simple meat stew if it is affordable. Many households consume vegetables at every meal, but most consume them at least once per day. Historically, Kenyans have eaten a wide range of vegetables including indigenous vegetables such as cowpea leaves, amaranth, and African nightshade, as shown in Table 2. Over the past several decades, especially in urban areas, these indigenous vegetables have been replaced by kale, Swiss chard, and cabbage, which are higher yielding and easier to harvest and thus much cheaper to purchase in the market. Indigenous vegetables, which were foraged from the wild, were also associated with poor, rural farming practices and were ignored by urban consumers. However, this trend is slowly beginning to reverse following campaigns that advocate the consumption of indigenous vegetables by enhancing consumers' nutritional knowledge and creating more favorable attitudes (Herforth 2010). The nutritional properties of these indigenous vegetables are very different than the newer varieties of kale, Swiss chard, and cabbage. For example, amaranth is rich in lysine, an essential amino acid, and can be an important source of this amino acid for people who lack access to meat or other sources of protein (Schippers 2000). People who eat a greater diversity of leafy green vegetables are likely consuming a more nutritionally balanced diet than people who eat fewer kinds of vegetables.In addition to measuring the overall diversity of foods consumed by farmers and non-farmers, our survey asked respondents about consumption of a list of vegetables that we had identified during qualitative interviews as ones that are commonly consumed, and sometimes grown in sack gardens. These vegetables are listed in Table 2. Overall, farmers reported consuming a significantly greater diversity of vegetables than non-farmers (p \\ 0.001) (Fig. 4). In particular, farmers were significantly more likely than non-farmers to consume certain vegetables such as kale, Swiss chard, coriander, beans, terere, kunde, managu, and nderema. There were no vegetables that non-farmers were statistically significantly more likely to consume than farmers. Farmers and non-farmers who consumed any of these vegetables tended to consume them with the same frequency, with the exception of Swiss chard and coriander, which farmers consumed more frequently than non-farmers. Given that these two crops are commonly grown in sack gardens, farmers may be consuming them more frequently because they are readily available. While sack gardening does not appear to have had an impact on the overall dietary diversity of households in Kibera, it has positively influenced the diversity of vegetables that a household consumed. Part of the reason for that is that farming households are able to use money saved from selling vegetables or by not needing to purchase vegetables to buy other kinds of foods. During the survey, when asked how consumption of food from sack gardens affects their household, 87 % of farmers stated that it saved money for the purchase of other types of foods, and 88 % felt that their gardens provided them with extra food. As one farmer explained, ''One benefit of sack gardening is that when I harvest vegetables, I don't have to buy them. I save the money I would have spent, and I can even buy fish.'' Gardening provides farmers with extra money, either from selling their crops or not having to buy them, and they use this money to buy staple foods (e.g., sugar, maize flour, cooking fat) and other kinds of vegetables. In qualitative interviews, farmers also suggested that gardening allowed them to buy the more expensive indigenous vegetables that they prefer from the market. Different indigenous vegetables are associated with different ethnic groups in Kenya, so people often have a strong cultural preference for particular indigenous vegetables (Herforth 2010). Because these vegetables are often more expensive than kale or Swiss chard, non-farming households may have been consuming fewer indigenous vegetables because they were less able to afford them than farmers.The urban poor often lack access to food because they are unable to afford the kinds of foods they would prefer, or cannot purchase it in sufficient quantities. Thus, they develop various coping strategies, sets of actions that include limiting the variety or quantity of food they consume (Maxwell 1995), but also extraordinary measures such as migration, disposal of assets, consumption of highly unattractive items, and unlawful means of procuring food (Corbett 1988).The urban poor who engage in urban agriculture often use it as a means to provide more food and reduce the need for other coping strategies. Therefore, we examined the impact of sack gardening in Kibera on household food security by looking at how frequently farmers experienced various coping mechanisms in the previous 12 months, as well as how households perceived their own food security. During the household survey, respondents were asked a series of questions to capture how food secure they felt their households were over the previous 12-month period. These questions asked about a range of scenarios that varied in terms of the severity of food insecurity, from simply worrying they might run out of food, to reduced portion sizes, to skipping meals, to going an entire day and night without food.Overall, farmers and non-farmers both reported high levels of food insecurity over the previous 12 months. Over 95 % of households reported worrying at some point in the last 12 months that their household would run out of food before they would acquire money to buy more. A majority of households reported using coping mechanisms such as eating foods they do not like, limiting the variety of foods they eat, and reducing their portion sizes or the number of Sack farmers grow all of these crops, but kale, Swiss chard, green onions, and coriander are the most frequently grown. Crops are listed in order of importance, based on the percentage of households who consumed the vegetable in the month prior to the survey meals they eat. Additionally, more than half the households interviewed reported having no food in their house at some point over the last year, and nearly 20 % reported going a whole day and night without food.There was no significant difference between the number of farming and non-farming households that reported these individual events happening over the previous 12 months, with the exception of reducing the number of meals (Table 3). Significantly fewer farmers than non-farmers reported having to reduce the number of meals they consumed (p = 0.059). In addition, there was a marginally significant difference (p = 0.070) in the total number of coping mechanisms that households used during the previous year, with farmers using fewer of them than non-farmers (Table 4). Farmers reported using an average of 5.6 coping mechanisms over the previous 12 months, while non-farmers used an average of 6.1. This indicates that farmers were marginally more food secure than non-farmers.After indicating whether or not they had used these different coping scenarios over the past year, respondents were then asked to rank how frequently they occurred, ranging from never to always or nearly always in all months. Amongst households that experienced these different food insecurity scenarios, there was no statistical difference between farmers and non-farmers in terms of how frequently they occurred. In addition, there was no difference between farmers and non-farmers in terms of whether or not children in the household were affected.Different variables, such as household wealth or level of education, are frequently assumed to impact household food security. Not surprisingly, lower household incomes were correlated with all respondents' inability to eat the types of foods they wanted, eating a limited variety of foods, eating reduced portion sizes, reducing the number of meals consumed, having no food in the house, sleeping hungry at night, and going an entire day and night without food. For both farmers and non-farmers, the lower their monthly income, the less their ability to secure food for their households.While most Kibera households are food insecure, sack gardening appears to have had a positive impact on household food security. By providing the household with extra food, or income from the sale of the crops, households are somewhat less reliant on other coping mechanisms such as reducing the quantity of food consumed at each meal. However, the extent to which sack gardens can contribute to overall household food security is constrained by the number of sacks that each household has. Because space is so limited within the slum, households in our study had limited space for sacks, planting an average of 5.3 sacks. These sacks supplement consumption or provide vegetables to sell, but not necessarily enough to alter behavioral patterns to a more significant extent.Although the impact of sack gardening on household coping strategies is marginal, one important benefit of sack gardening is that it has provided farmers with a perceived sense of security in times of need. Over and over during qualitative interviews, farmers stated that a positive benefit of sack gardening for them was that they knew there was always a source of food to turn to if they ran out of other food in their house. As one farmer explained, when asked about the benefits of sack gardening, ''The first thing is that it helps a lot. I never go to sleep hungry, and even my children will never sleep hungry.'' As part of the household survey, respondents were asked to rate how food secure their household was during the month prior to the interview, on a scale of one to four. Farmers felt that their households were more food secure a Consumption of vegetables, fruits or seafood was part of the overall FANTA dietary diversity index, and was scored as 0 or 1 (not eaten, eaten) in the previous 24-h period. Total vegetable diversity looked at number of vegetables consumed out of a list of 16 vegetables over the past 1 month b Coping strategies measure whether or not the respondent used the coping strategy in the 12 months prior to the interview c Social capital was measured on a scale of 1-4, with 1 being a good relationship with their neighbors and 4 being a poor relationship. Exchanges of goods and services asked whether or not (0 or 1) households had given or received goods in the previous 1 month compared to non-farmers (p = 0.005). While over 90 % of households reported experiencing some food insecurity in the month prior to the interview, farmers more frequently reported getting enough food to eat, just not necessarily the kinds they would like, while non-farmers more frequently reported that they did not get enough to eat (Fig. 5).Sack gardening is relatively new in the Kibera slums and was introduced to the area as a way to improve food security in a place where urban poverty is endemic. Although commonly accepted that it has improved food security, to date no empirical study has demonstrated that sack gardening has in fact done so, nor how. We were able to demonstrate that sack gardening has contributed to improved household food security directly. We also found that while there was not a significant change in overall dietary diversity, there was an increase in the variety of vegetables consumed, with farmers consuming more leafy green vegetables and fruit than nonfarmers. In addition, farmers eat a wider variety of leafy green vegetables, including many indigenous vegetables, which have broader nutritional benefits and are culturally preferred to kale, Swiss chard, and cabbage, which are consumed by most households in Kibera. More importantly, farmers feel more food secure than non-farmers do. They more frequently reported being able to eat enough and less likely to skip meals. Sack gardening has also resulted in an increase in social capital, particularly for those households that undertake sack gardening together with others. This helps food security indirectly. Theories suggest that communities with greater senses of trust and reciprocity have greater social capital. Our findings support this, demonstrating that by helping to improve social capital, sack gardening has helped farmers to strengthen the social safety nets that help to provide them with assistance in times of need.Although this study was conducted in a single informal settlement in Nairobi, it is one of the world's largest and most diverse slums, and we expect that this form of sack gardening would contribute to household food security in a similar manner in other densely populated slums elsewhere in the world, although the extent to which households benefit from sack gardening may vary with the cost of inputs such as seeds, water, and fertilizer. Worldwide, countries are undergoing rapid urbanization with the majority of population growth in urban areas taking place amongst the urban poor. The urban poor, particularly those living in informal settlements such as Kibera, often do not benefit from urban agriculture because they lack access to plots needed for farming (Tevera 1999). A recent baseline survey of urban agriculture in 11 cities across southern Africa found that very few poor residents practiced urban agriculture, partly because they lacked land to farm (Crush et al. 2011). Policies that promote types of low-space agriculture, such as sack gardening, that are more accessible to the urban poor have the potential to improve household food security as well as provide these households with alternate livelihood strategies."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3015164863.json b/main/part_2/3015164863.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b440ea800a37ed801cef4e9d30c5f221023c18a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3015164863.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"c02fdfed-5056-44a3-b75d-f445af416768","content":"\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3038769033.json b/main/part_2/3038769033.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4305d952659dad9e81d287ef352c2832bc6fdbad --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3038769033.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b376835a476d347aed39fa0a78b8b781","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2d02fd36-058d-4759-90a6-3ed920274f51/retrieve","id":"1149843048"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ccfeffb6-67dc-479b-b44f-20d6c99b315b","content":"▪ Pig production has dramatically increased over the last three decades in Uganda, owing to the growing demand for pork.▪ Large informal sector characterized by mainly backyard systems with small stock of animals that are kept freeroaming or tethered.▪ Low productivity from limited resources and veterinary support.▪ Compromised animal welfare leads to reduced productivity. ▪ Across all farms, sow mortality in the last 12 months was reported to be 2.5% (95% CI: 1.7, 4.8%).▪ Animal-based indicators identified 9% (CI: 6.1, 13.7%) of sows with scouring/diarrhea, 7.6% (4.7, 11.5%) with lameness and 92% (CI: 85.1, 96.7%) of dry or lactating sows were found to be 'skinny' with a body condition score of 1 or 2.▪ In addition, piglet mortality was as high as 10.2% (CI: 8.5, 12.9%).▪ A total of 19% of sows were partially or completely restricted from free movement inside pens.▪ 93% of sows had continuous access to water, but only 48.8% of the water supplies were clean. ▪ Wakiso District registered the lowest pig mortality which was significantly lower compared to the other three districts."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3051239475.json b/main/part_2/3051239475.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2f42d161898f6092ffdf53eeaff275017e54035 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3051239475.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"728b7cf1-d9a4-4f3b-8696-554db71cc42b","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3056867855.json b/main/part_2/3056867855.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4fcbf614c3a717565db8b894d8910e4802e451fb --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3056867855.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9b564d4532c88c47164e8fef12661345","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://data.iita.org/dataset/4892da5e-f059-4a6c-8ece-5e479c376067/resource/5bab5ff9-eb8a-4f16-984f-c3de005f5d28/download/questionnaire_csat_annual_evaluation_ba_2020.pdf","id":"1257093057"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6d0d55a3-1d63-4be2-af85-598a0cf50e5c","content":"Déclaration de consentement L'Institut International d'Agriculture Tropicale (IITA), en collaboration avec IER (Mali) / INRAN (Niger) et d'autres ONG nationales au Mali et au Niger, mène une étude de base pour un nouveau projet intitulé \"Technologies agricoles intelligentes face au climat (CSAT)\" pour améliorer les moyens de subsistance en milieu rural et la sécurité alimentaire au Mali et au Niger \". Votre ménage a été sélectionné au hasard en tant que participant à l'enquête. Je voudrais vous poser une série de questions et cet entretien durera environ une heure. Votre participation est volontaire et votre refus de participer ou de vous retirer de l'étude n'entraînera aucune pénalité ni perte d'avantages. Toutes les informations fournies par vous resteront confidentielles. Votre vie privée sera protégée dans toute la mesure permise par la loi. Si vous avez des questions, vous pouvez me demander ou contacter Bokar Moussa (INRAN-Zinder"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3065109414.json b/main/part_2/3065109414.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5c8cb731b8f62114f82a11dd840a05ac05424d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3065109414.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a9f2b3ed250f7e884774228e8ddcdab9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3f6b97cc-812a-4f09-acdb-823a4dc4ac53/retrieve","id":"-533641818"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c8b088b2-2dde-46e0-9987-74f3ee556b88","content":"Les techniques améliorées d'utilisation de l'énergie solaire sont peu connues, mais permettent pourtant d'obtenir des produits économiques, écologiques, de meilleure qualité et sont simples d'utilisation. Les cuiseurs et séchoirs solaires permettent de capturer les rayons du soleil pour chauffer et sécher les aliments.Ce guide présente des méthodes simples de fabrication et d'utilisation de cuiseurs et de séchoirs solaires : un cuiseur boîte, un cuiseur à panneaux, ainsi qu'un séchoir solaire direct et un séchoir solaire indirect. Facilement réalisables et utilisés en toute autonomie, ils permettent de satisfaire à moindre coût les besoins alimentaires de populations variées.Sans risque pour l'environnement, le cuiseur solaire permet de gagner du temps, de l'argent et de l'énergie. Tous les aliments (légumes, fruits, viandes, céréales, pain, etc.) peuvent y être cuisinés. Contrairement à la cuisson traditionnelle, la cuisson solaire est plus lente et permet par conséquent d'avoir des plats plus sains en préservant le goût et les nutriments, tout en rendant les viandes plus tendres. Les légumes, les fruits et les viandes cuisent parfaitement sans eau permettant ainsi d'accélérer la cuisson. Par contre, les céréales et féculents doivent être cuits dans une quantité d'eau inférieure d'un tiers à la quantité nécessaire pour la cuisson traditionnelle.Comparés au séchage en plein air, les séchoirs solaires permettent une meilleure conservation des produits. Les températures étant plus élevées, le séchage est plus complet. Les aliments sèchent 2 à 5 fois plus vite dans un séchoir solaire qu'à l'air libre. De plus, il permet de réduire les risques sanitaires en protégeant les produits contre les moisissures, les insectes, les animaux, la poussière et tout autre déchet. Le séchoir solaire diminue les manipulations et réduit le temps de séchage. Il permet d'obtenir des produits de meilleure qualité. La manipulation étant réduite, il n'y a pas de risque d'émiettement des produits.Le séchage des aliments au soleil et à l'air libre est une pratique ancestrale qui ne donne pas toujours des produits de bonne qualité. La cuisson des aliments quant à elle se fait traditionnellement avec du bois, du pétrole, du charbon ou du gaz, ce qui demande beaucoup d'attention et d'énergie. On distingue trois types de cuiseurs solaires :Également appelés « cuiseurs paraboliques », les cuiseurs à concentrateur incurvé atteignent rapidement de très hautes températures, mais nécessitent un ajustement fréquent et de nombreuses précautions concernant la sécurité. D'une puissance estimée à 400 W, ils sont les plus chers. La parabole permet de tout cuire et de réaliser des fritures. Il est préférable d'utiliser des récipients de couleur foncée qui absorbent mieux la chaleur, tandis que les couleurs claires réfléchissent les rayons du soleil.Cuisson impossible 9h -12h 12h -15h Après 15h Matériel et matériaux nécessaires • 2 boîtes en bois de taille différente, dont l'une plus petite devant rentrer dans l'autre. La boîte extérieure peut être fabriquée avec du bois ou du contreplaqué, celle intérieure à partir de bois, ou de métal (aluminium de préférence).• Au choix et selon la disponibilité : du polystyrène, des blocs de mousse, du papier journal froissé en boules, de la laine de mouton, des fibres de plantes séchées (riz, feuilles de bananier, fibres de noix de coco, etc.), des plumes ou des cendres pour isoler l'espace entre les deux boîtes (pas de polyvinyle, pas de laine de verre ou d'autres plastiques qui dégagent de la fumée à haute température). La laine de mouton ou la cendre devront être disponibles en grande quantité. Toutefois, la cendre augmente le poids du four. >>> Assemblage des deux boîtes • Remplir le fond de la grande boîte avec l'isolant sur une hauteur de 1 à 3 cm. • Placer la seconde boîte à l'intérieur de la première. Rembourrer les espaces vides entre les boîtes avec le même matériau utilisé pour le fond sans déformer les boîtes, tout en s'assurant qu'elles ne bougent pas.* Toutes les mesures sont en centimètres.Le cuiseur boîte est constitué de deux boîtes en bois ou en carton, l'une plus grande que l'autre de trois centimètres dans toutes les directions.Utiliser les schémas ci-dessous pour obtenir les 2 boîtes en bois ou en carton.• Placer des morceaux de mousse au-dessus de l'isolant afin de remplir totalement l'espace entre les deux boîtes.• Fermer l'espace entre les deux boîtes avec quatre tasseaux en bois de sorte que tous les bords se joignent harmonieusement.• Découper des morceaux de carton de la taille des parois intérieures de la petite boîte. Recouvrir de papier aluminium. Coller le papier aluminium sur le carton en veillant à ce qu'il soit bien lisse, sans plis ni bulles d'air ou de colle.• Agrafer le carton recouvert de papier aluminium sur les parois intérieures du four. Tapisser le fond de la boîte intérieure avec du carton noir qui absorbe la chaleur. • Étaler le carton sur une surface plate et y dessiner les contours du cuiseur à l'aide du plan ci-dessous.• Pour obtenir les formes du cuiseur, découper les 2 fentes avec précision en prenant soin de ne pas les élargir. La largeur des fentes est essentielle à la stabilité de la structure.• Marquer les lignes de pliage à l'aide d'un outil fin (manche de cuillère, manche de couteau, règle). Plier le carton en suivant les lignes de pliage.• Pour une bonne conservation du cuiseur et pour éviter l'humidité, peindre l'arrière du carton (surfaces non réfléchissantes). Laisser sécher.• Coller une feuille d'aluminium sur toute la surface avant du cuiseur. Prendre soin de bien coller les zones de pliage. Laisser sécher.• Ranger le cuiseur à l'abri de l'humidité et des animaux. De temps en temps, essuyer les parois réfléchissantes du cuiseur avec un chiffon sec. Si les panneaux de carton se mouillent, le poser à plat (face brillante contre le sol) jusqu'à ce qu'il soit sec. Prendre soin de ne pas abîmer la surface brillante.• Les sacs en plastique utilisés pour servir d'attrape-chaleur (voir section suivante) peuvent être utilisés plus de dix fois. S'ils se déchirent, les réparer éventuellement à l'aide de ruban adhésif afin de prolonger leur usage.• Plier le cuiseur et le monter. Le cuiseur à panneaux est terminé.• Le cuiseur peut être plié en deux ou de façon à ne plus faire que 33 cm 2 de surface.Pour éviter toute contamination des aliments lors de l'utilisation des cuiseurs solaires, il est indispensable de respecter les règles d'hygiène suivantes : • se laver les mains avec du savon avant de manipuler les aliments • nettoyer et sécher les ustensiles avant utilisation • nettoyer les surfaces qui seront en contact avec les aliments • consommer rapidement les aliments qui ont été cuits.• Avant de commencer la cuisson avec un cuiseur boîte, ajuster le réflecteur pour permettre d'avoir un angle correct et une réflexion des rayons du soleil sur les aliments. L'angle idéal permet la réflexion d'un maximum de rayons du soleil sur la vitre, comme indiqué sur la figure ci-dessous.• Mettre les aliments dans un récipient de couleur foncée avec un couvercle.• Disposer le récipient au centre du cuiseur boîte et laisser cuire le repas sans remuer la nourriture pendant la cuisson. Éviter d'ouvrir le cuiseur pendant la cuisson, car cela provoque une perte de chaleur.• Bien orienter le cuiseur solaire par rapport au soleil pour mieux capter le rayonnement. Réorienter le cuiseur une fois par heure pour obtenir une efficacité optimale.Placer le plat sur un support en fil de fer ou un support fait avec des cailloux afin de créer un courant d'air autour du plat sans perte de chaleur. Prendre soin de choisir un support bien stable, par exemple un support plus grand que le récipient. Le plat doit être fixé sur le support à environ 6 cm de hauteur. Ce support permet aux rayons du soleil d'être reflétés à la fois sur le plat, en dessous et sur les côtés. Fermer le sac.• Mettre les aliments dans un récipient de couleur foncée avec un couvercle.• Pour augmenter l'efficacité des cuiseurs à panneaux, mettre le plat dans un « attrape-chaleur » transparent qui laisse passer les rayons solaires. Utiliser soit un sac en plastique résistant à la chaleur soit un grand récipient en verre retourné. Les bols en Pyrex retournés peuvent être utilisés, mais prévoir dans ce cas un support en verre sur lequel placer le tout pour éviter de gâter le cuiseur. Utilisation du cuiseur boîte ou du cuiseur à panneaux pour la pasteurisation des aliments Outre la cuisson alimentaire, les cuiseurs solaires peuvent être utilisés pour la pasteurisation des liquides et des aliments. Pour éviter toute contamination des aliments, il est indispensable de respecter les règles d'hygiène élémentaires décrites ci-dessus.De plus, il est indispensable de conserver les aliments pasteurisés dans des récipients bien secs et fermés hermétiquement.>>> pasteurisation des liquides et aliments L'eau impure est un problème majeur de santé, car elle cause des maladies telles que le choléra, la dysenterie, la typhoïde, le ver de Guinée ou l'hépatite A. La pasteurisation permet de tuer les germes par exposition à la chaleur. Les cuiseurs solaires permettent de chauffer l'eau à haute température pour la débarrasser des microbes (Escherichia coli, rotavirus, Giardia lambia, virus de l'hépatite A). Le lait et les aliments sont pasteurisés quand ils sont chauffés à 71 °C.Pour s'assurer que la pasteurisation de l'eau a été correctement effectuée, on peut utiliser un indicateur WAPI (Water Pasteurization Indicator). Ce dispositif simple et réutilisable contient un morceau de cire qui fond lorsque l'eau a atteint la température de pasteurisation, permettant ainsi de démontrer que l'eau a atteint la température adéquate. En Afrique, le bois, le charbon de bois, le gaz et les résidus agricoles (déchets de noix de palme, bouses de vache, etc.) constituent la majeure partie de l'énergie domestique. Un ménage consomme en moyenne 5 kg de bois par jour. Les besoins familiaux s'élèvent donc à 1825 kg de bois par an. Le prix du bois étant en moyenne de 80 FCFA par kg, les dépenses annuelles destinées à l'achat du bois sont d'environ 146 000 FCFA (222,50 e) par ménage. Pour ce qui est de la consommation du gaz, elle est en moyenne de 12,5 kg par mois et par ménage, soit 150 kg de gaz par an. Le prix d'une bouteille de gaz de 12,5 kg étant d'environ 6 000 FCFA, les dépenses annuelles de gaz sont de 72 000 FCFA (109,70 e) pour les ménages concernés. Bien que les cuiseurs solaires ne puissent être utilisés que par temps ensoleillé, ils constituent une alternative intéressante en raison de la gratuité de la source d'énergie utilisée et des effets positifs sur l'environnement (pas de pollution de l'air, réduction de la déforestation). Pour le bon fonctionnement du séchoir solaire, la vitre du séchoir doit faire un angle de 45° par rapport au sol et le séchoir doit être orienté face au sud. • Faire des trous au fond et dans la partie arrière. Ces trous permettront d'assurer la ventilation du séchoir.• Fixer les différentes parties ensemble : fixer les côtés sur le fond, fixer ensuite l'arrière et le devant.• Fabriquer deux cadres en bois aux dimensions de la boîte. Poser la vitre sur le premier cadre, fermer avec un joint en silicone, fixer le deuxième cadre sur l'autre côté de la vitre de la même façon.• Fixer deux charnières entre le cadre de la vitre et l'arrière de la boîte.• Fixer des tasseaux à l'intérieur de la boîte comme indiqué sur le schéma.Ces tasseaux permettront de soutenir les claies.• Une plaque en bois ou plusieurs morceaux de bois d'épaisseur de 0,5 cm à 2 cm • Une plaque en plastique type plexiglas ou une plaque de verre de 1 m x 60 cm • Fabriquer deux claies avec des tasseaux. Faire des cadres en bois de 95 cm x 55 cm et fixer une moustiquaire dessus.• Fixer la moustiquaire sur toutes les aérations, ainsi que sous le séchoir et à l'arrière de celui-ci.• Fixer deux morceaux de bois sur chacun des côtés pour surélever le séchoir au-dessus du sol, comme indiqué sur le schéma.Pour le bon fonctionnement des séchoirs solaires directs ou indirects, les deux éléments importants sont l'orientation par rapport au soleil et la ventilation. Il est essentiel de toujours avoir un angle de 35° à 45° face au sud, et de mettre en place une ventilation correcte.Tous les séchoirs solaires indirects sont composés de deux parties : le capteur solaire et la chambre de séchage (voir schéma). Ce guide technique détaille la construction simple et rapide d'un séchoir solaire vertical, c'est-à-dire dans lequel le capteur solaire se situe sous la chambre de séchage. Le plan décrit ci-dessous peut être adapté pour construire des séchoirs de tailles différentes. Planche de fixation• Installer le séchoir dans un endroit bien ensoleillé, orienté plein sud.• Laver les aliments avant de les sécher, retirer ceux qui sont abîmés.• Pour faciliter le processus de séchage, lorsque c'est possible, découper les aliments en fines lamelles ou en petits morceaux. Les petits aliments ne pouvant pas être découpés pourront être séchés tels quels.• Il faut 1 à 4 jours pour sécher des aliments par temps ensoleillé. En cas de mauvais temps, rentrer le séchoir dans un lieu sec, sous un abri. Si le mauvais temps persiste, il est possible de terminer le chauffage au four doux.• Conserver les aliments séchés dans une boîte hermétique et propre, de préférence dans un lieu sec et frais.• Découper deux morceaux de bois de 27 cm x 27 cm pour fermer les fenêtres latérales. Utiliser des charnières pour fixer ces carrés sur les ouvertures des côtés B et D. Poser des systèmes de fermeture. Tous les orifices du séchoir doivent être fermés ou recouverts de moustiquaire pour éviter que les insectes entrent dans le séchoir.• Fixer des morceaux de moustiquaire sur les fenêtres latérales.• Fixer un morceau de moustiquaire au-dessus de la porte pour la sortie de l'air chaud.• Vérifier l'étanchéité de la porte. Poser des morceaux de bois ou de mousse pour calfeutrer les orifices si nécessaire. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3068768676.json b/main/part_2/3068768676.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69218114bbc263c285d7fbb00eb56c8b2f3849b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3068768676.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ca32d7ef72764f346eab57bf1476e2d9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/faab1c74-112a-43b5-bdcd-d5c2ec6e70fd/retrieve","id":"-1725540880"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d777cc3b-a122-46e5-8872-7cb47c8f6204","content":"Techniques: visual, palpatory and by incision for the presence of gross lesions and bruises."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3092142044.json b/main/part_2/3092142044.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5f9ea88946c338db5107e75c9a63b0b87214e53 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3092142044.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"942ff3011d3330e983ccc1502dfd6747","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6a0fcc4e-7e5f-4043-a9cb-cd122cad7a29/retrieve","id":"-384557695"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8be6bfb8-ea46-4fc2-969d-9130d99d082e","content":"Rhizobia inoculation can increase soybean yield, but its performance is influenced by among others soybean genotype, rhizobia strains, environment, and crop management. The objective of the study was to assess soybean response to rhizobia inoculation when grown in soils amended with urea or vermicompost to improve nitrogen levels. Two greenhouse experiments and one field trial at two sites were carried out. The first greenhouse experiment included soils from sixty locations, sampled from smallholder farms in Western Kenya. The second greenhouse experiment consisted of one soil selected among soils used in the first experiment where inoculation response was poor. The soil was amended with vermicompost or urea. In the two greenhouse experiments, Legumefix (inoculant) + Sympal (legume fertilizer blend) were used as a standard package. Results from the second greenhouse experiment were then validated in the field. Analysis of variance was done using SAS statistical software and mean separation was done using standard error of the difference for shoot biomass, grain yield nodulation, nodule effectiveness and nutrient uptake. In the first greenhouse trial, soybean response to inoculation was significantly affected by soil fertility based on nodule fresh weight and shoot biomass. Soils with low nitrogen had low to no response to inoculation. After amendment, nodule fresh weight, nodule effectiveness, nodule occupancy, and shoot dry biomass were greater in the treatment amended with vermicompost than those amended with urea (Legumefix + Sympal + vermicompost and Legumefix + Sympal + urea) respectively. Under field conditions, trends were similar to the second experiment for nodulation, nodule occupancy and nitrogen uptake resulting in significantly greater grain yields (475, 709, 856, 880, 966 kg ha −1 ) after application of vermicompost at 0, 37, 74, 111, and 148 kg N ha −1 respectively. It was concluded that soybean nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation in low fertility soils would not be suppressed by organic amendments like vermicompost up to 148 kg N ha −1 .Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) is one of the world's most important legumes in terms of production and trade and has been a dominant oilseed since the 1960s (Smith and Huyser, 1987). The crop is well known for its high protein content (about 40%) among the most cultivated crops (Li-Juan and Ru-Zhen, 2010). Additionally, it can improve soil properties and soil biological health by soil nitrogen enrichment through biomass addition and N 2 fixation (Singh and Shivakumar, 2010). In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where over 80% of the soil are nitrogen deficient (Liu et al., 2010), and over 39% of the children under 5 years are malnourined and stunted. This has been related to deficiency of essential nutrients in most of diets, particularly proteins (Müller and Krawinkel, 2005), which has contributed to over one third of child deaths (Bain et al., 2013). Integration of soybean in the smallholder farming systems would thus not only improve human nutrition when the crop is included in the diet practices but also soil productivity. Such benefits would however, materialize when good agronomic practices, including integrated soil fertility management, are implemented in soybean production systems.Crop production, including soybean, faces many constraints which includes among others abiotic and socio-economic factors accounting for production discrepancies across regions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Therefore, grain yields remain low compared to other regions in the world (Mpepereki et al., 2000). Integrated soil fertility management (ISFM), has been proposed as a viable way towards the sustainable intensification of smallholder agriculture (Vanlauwe et al., 2010). The high cost of inputs for nutrient replenishment or soil amendment has, however, limited their adoption by resource-constrained smallholder farmers (Yakubu et al., 2010). Utilization of soybean varieties with high biological nitrogen fixation potential and application of rhizobia inoculants would represent cost-effective option to reduce mineral N application (Kueneman et al., 1984;Musiyiwa et al., 2005;Zengeni and Giller, 2007;Bekere and Hailemariam, 2012;Thuita et al., 2012;Ronner et al., 2016). Studies on N 2 fixation in soybean using different methodologies revealed that soybean shows a strong demand for nitrogen up to 80 kg N per 1000 kg of soybean grain for optimal development and grain productivity (Hungria et al., 2006;Salvagiotti et al., 2008). Soybean can fix N from the atmosphere ranging from 0-450 kg N ha −1 (Giller, 2001;Unkovich and Pate, 2000). Under favorable environments for N fixation, over 60 to 70% of the N requirement of the soybean can be derived from BNF (Herridge et al., 2008), while the balance could be derived from the soil N stock. Conversely, Mapfumo (2011) reported that BNF could be as low as 5 kg N ha −1 in depleted soils, which are quite common in the smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. This would imply reliance on nitrogen fertilizers even for legume crops.Low soil fertility in SSA is often characterized by low available phosphorous (P), nitrogen (N), organic matter (C org ), and soil acidity, among others (Sanchez et al., 1997). Such variables must be corrected as they are an integral part of the interaction of legume genotype, rhizobia strain, environment, and crop management which determine the performance of BNF, and legume productivity in general (Gibson et al., 1982;Woomer et al., 2014;Keino et al., 2015;Thuita et al., 2018). Soil organic carbon is a key driver of soil fertility that could even affect the performance of non-limiting factors, when it is below a certain level in a specific soil type (Gruhn et al., 2000). Response to inorganic fertilizers could be enhanced by addition of organic matter (Singh and Ryan, 2015). However, most of agricultural soils in SSA contain low levels of organic carbon due to competing uses of organic residues (Nandwa, 2001;Bationo et al., 2007). Initiatives that promote rhizobia inoculation in legume production in Africa generally recommend application of nutrients such as P. Lately more balanced fertilizer blends have been developed for use with inoculant that do not include N (Streeter and Wong, 1988;Svenning et al., 1996;Woomer et al., 2014;Ronner et al., 2016). This is due to the general assumption that rhizobia would supply the N required by the legume and application in form of mineral N would inhibit nodulation. While such inhibition has been well-documented (Zahran, 1999), this could be different in low fertility soils that are N deficient (Becker et al., 1986). Starter N is sometimes needed to achieve a substantial yield of legumes, including soybean, when the symbiotic N 2 fixation is unable to provide enough nitrogen (Ohyama et al., 2011).The objective of the study was thus to assess whether soils with low inoculation response could be improved by application of nitrogen. It was hypothesized that an organic source of nitrogen would perform better than a mineral N fertilizer, given the expected high correlation between organic carbon and total nitrogen in agricultural soils (Rashidi and Seilsepour, 2009).Two greenhouse experiments were established at the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Duduville Campus, Nairobi, Kenya. Soils were collected from sixty farms of Siaya County where low soybean response to inoculation was observed (Masso et al., 2016;Thuita et al., 2018) (Fig. 1) and where varied response to an ISFM soybean package had been observed. Soil was collected at a depth of 0-20 cm, air dried under shade and thoroughly mixed to pass through 2 mm sieve. Sub samples were analyzed for physical, chemical and microbiological properties prior to planting. The soils organic Carbon was determined by chromic acid digestion and spectrophotometric analysis (Heanes, 1984), total N (%) determined from a wet acid digest (Buondonno et al., 1995) and N analyzed by colorimetric analysis (Anderson and Ingram, 1993), soil texture was determined using the hydrometer method, soil pH in water determined in a 1:2.5 (w/v) soil:water suspension, available P using the Mehlich-3 procedure (Mehlich, 1984) and the resulting extracts analyzed using the molybdate blue procedure described by Murphy and Riley (1962), exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, and K) extracted using the Mehlich-3 procedure and determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Estimation of rhizobia in the soils was done using the most probable number count as described by Brockwell et al. (1975); soybean variety TGx1740-2 F was used as a trap crop grown in N free and autoclaved sterile sand. These were grown to flowering stage.The experiment was laid as Completely Randomized Design (CRD) including: (i) 60 soils collected from the sites indicated in Fig. 1, with N and C org ranges of 0.029-0.21% and 0.53-2.1% respectively, (ii) two treatments uninoculated and inoculated (Legumefix) + fertilizer (Sympal) replicated 3 times for a total number of 360 experimental units. Co-application of Legumefix and Sympal, as an inoculation package, was informed by previous findings of Woomer et al. (2014) and Masso et al. (2016). Sympal is a legume-specific fertilizer blend (i.e. 0N+ 23P 2 O 5 + 15K 2 O+ 10CaO + 4S + 1MgO + 0.1Zn) and was applied at a rate equivalent to 30 kg P ha −1 (assuming 1 ha = 2.24 * 10 6 kg of soil) and thoroughly mixed with the soil for the inoculated treatments (i.e. ≈300 kg Sympal ha −1 ). Soybean variety (TGx1740-2 F) was selected due to its better nodulation with a range of rhizobia than local varieties used in different parts of Kenya (Wasike et al., 2009). Seeds were surface-sterilized by soaking in 3.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution for 2 min and rinsed thoroughly 5 times with sterile distilled water. Soils were weighed to fill in perforated 2.5 kg pots. Legumefix (Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain 532c) from Legume technology Inc (UK) was used at a rate of 10 g for 1 kg soybean seeds for the inoculated treatments. Three healthy seeds of uniform size were then planted per pot and thinned to one plant per pot of comparable height and vigor at 2 weeks after planting. Routine management practices such as watering (with distilled water) were carried out until termination of the experiment i.e. at 50% podding. This trial was intended to determine soybean response to co-application of Legumefix and Sympal in various soils characterized by a gradient of nitrogen content.One of the 60 experimental soils (Trial Site 17 in Fig. 1), that showed low response to inoculation in the first greenhouse experiment based on low nodule fresh weight and shoot dry weight observed was used. The soil N levels were amended either with vermicompost (Phymyx) or urea. Vermicompost was chosen as a slow release form of N compared to urea. A slow N release would reduce the negative effect of N application to nodulation at the early growth stages of soybean. The vermicompost is made by composting for 6 months the substrate used in mushroom production (the substrate is made using wheat straw, sunflower cake, cotton seed cake, chicken manure and then sterilized. Mushroom is grown on it and the substrate is added with 10% minjingu rock phosphate and earthworms and left for 6 months. Sieving is done and then packaged as vermicompost). The soil was collected from an area of 4 by 3 m at a depth of 0-20 cm and homogenized after air drying and sieving. Vermicompost (Vc) was applied at 5 levels with even intervals including a control (i.e. at rates equivalent to 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 t Vc ha −1 ). Equivalent amounts of N were applied using urea (46% N). The rates of N were 0, 37, 74, 111, and 148 kg N ha −1 . Before application vermicompost was analyzed to aid in determining amount of N present to enable application of equivalent amounts from urea fertilizer. The analyses were as follows; total N (0.88%), organic C (7.31%), available P (0.39%), Ca (0.29%), Mg (0.1%), K (0.22%), and pH 6.70. It was also expected to contain trace micronutrients (not determined). Two levels of Legumefix were used as in the first greenhouse experiment. The trial was laid as a CRD and each treatment was replicated 3 times for a total of 60 experimental pots. Planting, management and harvesting were done as described in the first greenhouse experiment. The trial was thus intended to determine whether application of starter N would improve low soybean response to co-application of Legumefix and Sympal in a low fertility soil, and whether there was a systematic difference between vermicompost and urea as sources of N.The plants were harvested at 50% podding. Shoots were cut using a clean, sharp knife at 1 cm above the soil surface. The pots were emptied on a 2-mm sieve and soil washed to isolate the nodules from the roots. Nodule fresh weight, shoot biomass and nodule occupancy were recorded in both greenhouse experiments, whereas in the second greenhouse experiment additional data collected was on nodule effectiveness and N uptake.The field trial was intended to validate the findings of the second greenhouse trials under field conditions with focus on the best performing source of N and determine the yield performance. The trial was conducted at site 17 (Soil B) and site 7 (soil A) (Fig. 1). Site 17 was the farm at which soil was collected for the second greenhouse experiment. Soils from both sites had similar response trends in nodulation and shoot biomass in the first greenhouse experiment even though they did not have the same physical and chemical characteristics (Table 1) and thus were chosen for the field trial validation. The field trial was conducted during the long rains (April to August) 2016 cropping season. The treatments at each site were laid out in a full factorial in randomized complete block design replicated three times. Sympal applied at the rates used in the greenhouse trials (0 and 30 kg P ha −1 ). The five rates of vermicompost used in the second greenhouse experiment was applied i.e. equivalent to 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 t ha −1 , whereas two levels of Legumefix were used i.e. inoculated and uninoculated. The maximum of 10 t ha −1 was based on general recommendation for compost application in the region. The plot sizes were 3 m by 3 m and 0.5 m alley between the plots and 1 m between the blocks. Soybean was planted at a spacing of 50 cm (between rows) by 5 cm (within rows) at the onset of long rainy season (April 2016). Vermicompost and Sympal were applied in furrows and mixed with soil before placement of seeds to avoid direct contact with the seed. Seed sterilization and Legumefix application rate were as done in the greenhouse trials. The trials were kept weed free by weeding using hand hoe.In the field trial, the parameters recorded at 50% podding were nodule fresh weight, nodule effectiveness, nodule occupancy, shoot dry biomass and N uptake, while at harvest grain yield was determined. Eight to ten plants were taken from one of the inner rows about 50 cm from the beginning of the line at 50% podding. Nodules were dug out and washed for nodule fresh weight determination and shoots collected for drying and weighing. A sample i.e. 10% of the total number of nodules counted per treatment was taken and used for determining nodule effectiveness as described by Adjei et al. (2002). At physiological maturity i.e. when 95% of the pods had turned golden yellow, all plants were harvested from the net plot excluding the border rows. Number and weight of all plants were recorded from each plot and grains and haulms separated and weighed. The grains were later ovendried to a constant weight.Fresh shoots were dried at 60 °C until constant weight (approximately 48 h) to obtain the dry weights. The shoots were later milled for total N analysis by modified Kjeldahl method. Nitrogen uptake at 50% podding was determined as the product of shoot dry biomass and the respective nitrogen content in the shoot and reported as g N plant −1 .Nodule occupancy was then done using Polymerase chain reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. This involved amplification and restriction of the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region. A maximum number of eight nodules from each of the three replicates per treatment (24 nodules) were crushed separately in 150 μl of sterile water and DNA extracted by Krasova-Wade et al. (2003) protocol. Amplification of DNA (PCR) was conducted as described by Navarro et al. (1992) and Ponsonnet and Nesme (1994) using rhizobia specific primers. Due to low number of nodules in the low rates of vermicompost and urea treatments, only the three upper rates and their respective combinations (i.e. 74, 111, and 148 kg N ha −1 ) were examined. In addition, restriction was only conducted for PCR products of a single band of 930-1050 bp using restriction endonucleases Msp I. The strains with identical fragment size and number were classified into the same profile and the profiles used to score the inoculant (Legumefix) efficacy in percentages (Thuita et al., 2012).In the two greenhouse trials and the field trial, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to assess the effects of the various sources of variation i.e. treatments using SAS version 9.4. The effects of the various factors and their interactions were assessed using standard error of difference (SED) on the mean. The significance level of the models was set at p < 0.05. In the 1 st greenhouse experiment, box plots and whiskers were also used to summarize the information on nodule fresh weight and shoot biomass given the large number of experimental soils (i.e. sixty data points). The assessment of nodule occupancy for the greenhouse and field trials was based on PCR-RFLP profiles with similar bp fragments in size after restriction and compared to the IGS profile of strain B. japonicum 532c and converted to a percentage of total nodules examined for each IGS profile group.Selected properties of the experimental soils including details of Trial Sites 7 and 17 before the beginning of the greenhouse and field trials are presented in Table 1. A wide variation in soil properties was noted with coefficients of variance (CV) ranging from 11 to 208% with most of the parameters falling under what is considered low. There was a strong correlation between total N and C org (r = 0.94). Rhizobia population for the selected soils ranged from 0 to 2.83 × 10 2 CFU g −1 of soil; hence, a response to inoculation was expected.In greenhouse experiment one, the nodule fresh weight (NFW) varied significantly (p < 0.05) across the 60 soils tested irrespective of inoculation. This variation was related to the wide variation in soil properties (Table 2; Fig. 2). On average, inoculation + fertilization treatments had higher NFW than uninoculated soils (no inoculum or fertilizer) (Fig. 2). The NFW was generally low in the soils of poor fertility, which calls for further investigation to raise understanding of the inoculation response variability often observed in field trials.In greenhouse experiment two, co-application of starter N in the form of vermicompost or urea, Legumefix plus Sympal significantly increased nodule fresh weight (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Vermicompost coapplied with Legumefix + Sympal consistently produced a significantly higher nodule fresh weight than urea co-applied with Legumefix and Sympal (Fig. 3a). The higher rates of urea led to a decrease in NFW compared to vermicompost, which may be related to the difference in the availability of N from the two sources.In the field experiment, NFW was improved by inoculation (P < 0.05) at Trial site 17 compared to Trial site 7 (Fig. 3b), which could be related to the initial fertility level of the sites (Table 1). Conversely, in the absence of inoculation Trial site 7 nodulation was higher (p < 0.05) than Trial site 17 (Fig. 3b), which could be associated with the abundance of soybean nodulating rhizobia at Trial site 7 (Table 1). Regardless of the sites and inoculation, application of Sympal (Fig. 3c) and vermicompost (Fig. 3d) improved NFW, which implied that the nodulation of soybean by native rhizobia could be improved with good soil fertility management.In the greenhouse experiment 2, N-amendment using vermicompost or urea co-applied with Legumefix and Sympal significantly increased the percentage of effective nodules (p < 0.05) (Table 2; Fig. 4a). Vermicompost co-applied with Legumefix and Sympal consistently had higher percentage of effective nodules as compared to urea co-applied with Legumefix and Sympal (Fig. 4a).In field conditions, inoculation at Trial Site 7 and Trial Site 17 improved nodule effectiveness at both sites, but co-application with Sympal showed better performance at Site 17 than Site 7 when compared to inoculation without Sympal (Fig. 4b). Conversely, in the absence of inoculation, Sympal improved nodule effectiveness at Site 7 than Site 17, while when Sympal was not applied nodule effectiveness was similar at both sites (Fig. 4b). While Sympal contributed to the improvement of the nodule effectiveness, the magnitude of the response demonstrated that inoculation was very critical to enhance the percentage of effective nodules. There was a significant increase of nodule effectiveness (p < 0.05) following vermicompost application. The highest nodule effectiveness was found at total N rate ≥ 74 kg ha −1 irrespective of inoculation and Sympal at both sites (Fig. 4c).In the greenhouse experiment 1, three IGS profile groups were obtained from PCR-RFLP analysis. The IGS profile I (inoculant strain) was dominant in the inoculated soils, while IGS profile II and III (indigenous strains) were dominant in the non-inoculated soils (Table 3). In the greenhouse experiment 2, nodule occupancy by the inoculant strain consistently increased with increase in vermicompost rates in the uninoculated treatment, showing that the strain in the rhizobia inoculant is present in the study region due to previous history of soybean cultivation with the inoculant strain in the two sites (Table 4). Increased rate of N from vermicompost up to 148 kg ha −1 did not suppress nodule occupancy by the inoculant strain. At the rate 148 kg N ha −1 from urea nodulation was suppressed to the extent no nodules were found irrespective of inoculation. This was attributed to the slow release of N from not inhibiting nodulation while the high rates of N from urea did inhibit nodulation. For the rates of 74 and 111 kg N ha −1 , under coapplication of the rhizobia inoculant and Sympal, all the nodule analyzed were occupied by the inoculant strain. Based on the results reported in Fig. 3a (nodule fresh weight) and Fig. 4a (nodule effectiveness) at 148 kg N ha −1 from urea, there was a likelihood some native strains that can nodulate soybean were not detected by the specific primers used to assess the nodule occupancy and thus total number of nodules analyzed were not equal in all the treatments. This often occurs when some bacteria have acquired genes that enable nodulation but may not have all the required genes to allow detection by the set of primers; further investigation would be required.In the field trial, highest inoculant strain recovery (nodule occupancy) was observed with the combination of Legumefix, vermicompost and Sympal demonstrating the relevance of the combination to supply additional nutrient, organic matter, and rhizobia particularly in the low fertility soil at Site 7 (Table 4). Highest inoculant strain recovery was attained when vermicompost was applied at 74 kg N ha −1 and 111 kg N ha −1 and combined with Sympal and Legumefix at Site 7 (94%), while there was a slight reduction at 148 kg N ha −1 for the same inputs though the inoculant strain recovery was still higher than 66% (Table 4). At Site 17, which was slightly more fertile than Site 7, the value addition of co-applying Legumefix and Sympal in the presence of vermicompost was reduced, except at 111 kg N ha −1 (Table 4). In the absence of the rhizobia inoculant, co-application of vermicompost and Sympal did enhance the nodule occupancy by native strains, although they were less effective based on the results on nodule effectiveness (Fig. 4b). In general, a consistently higher percentage of nodules occupied by the inoculant strain was observed in the inoculated and amended soils for both greenhouse and field conditions at moderate levels of N (i.e. 74 and 111 kg N ha −1 regardless of the source of N). This suggests that the introduced strain was more competitive in the amended soils and explains the higher percentage of effective nodules (Fig. 4b). The recovery of the inoculant strain from the uninoculated treatments (especially in the second greenhouse experiment) was attributed to previous history of soybean cultivation with the same inoculant on the two farms.On average, the inoculated treatment gave a higher shoot dry weight than the uninoculated soils in the first greenhouse trial, with an increase of 38% over the control (Fig. 2), but the improvement of shoot biomass following inoculation significantly varied across soils (Table 2). In the second greenhouse experiment, co-application of N amendments (vermicompost or urea) with Legumefix and Sympal enhanced shoot dry biomass (Fig. 5a). When N was applied as vermicompost, the value addition of Legumefix and Sympal was found at the low rate of vermicompost (equivalent 0 and 37 kg N ha −1 ). Conversely, when N was applied as urea, there were significant differences in shoot biomass between Legumefix + Sympal + urea compared to urea alone in all the urea rates. The difference between the two sources of N can be related to the additional nutrients in vermicompost compared to urea that only supplied N. Across treatments, the highest shoot dry biomass at 50% podding was found at 148 N kg −1 applied as urea and combined with Legumefix and Sympal. This could be attributed to the fact that nitrogen from urea was readily available for uptake and resulted in vigorous vegetative growth and more biomass accumulation at the early stage of the crop with minimal N losses in the greenhouse conditions.In the field conditions, co-application of vermicompost and Legumefix significantly improved shoot dry biomass compared to vermicompost in the absence of Legumefix, particularly when Sympal was not applied (Fig. 5b). When Sympal was added to both combinations (i.e. vermicompost with and without Legumefix), the difference in shoot dry biomass was reduced, which could be related to improved utilization of N. On average, the shoot dry biomass was higher at Site 17 than Site 7 irrespective of the treatments (Fig. 5c), which was consistent with the initial chemical properties of the two sites (Table 1).In the second greenhouse experiment, co-application of vermicompost or urea as source of starter N with Legumefix and Sympal significantly increased biomass N uptake when compared to the starter N sources in the absence of Legumefix and Sympal (Table 2; Fig. 6a). When vermicompost or urea was not co-applied with Legumefix and Sympal, increased rates of vermicompost enhanced biomass N uptake, while increased rates of urea reduced N uptake. This could be related to the improved soybean growth in the presence of vermicompost related to the additional nutrients in the inputs, which would have improved the root system development (data not collected) and consequently N uptake. Application of Legumefix and Sympal to both starter N treatments further enhanced plant development and therefore N uptake.In the field conditions, co-application of vermicompost and Sympal enhanced N uptake at Site 7 (which was less fertile) more than Site 17 (Fig. 6b). In the absence of Sympal, N uptake was similar at both sites when vermicompost was applied. On average, rhizobia inoculation showed higher N uptake than uninoculated plants, irrespective of trial sites, vermicompost and Sympal (Fig. 6c).When soybean was inoculated, yields were higher at Site 17 than Site 7, while both sites had similar yields in the absence of inoculation (Fig. 7a). Hence, the apparent difference in soil fertility at the two sites (Table 1), was not enough to show a difference in yields without soil amendment. Amendment with vermicompost increased soybean grain yield from N rate of 74 kg ha −1 compared to the absolute control (Fig. 7b); this rate of N was equivalent to five metric tons of vermicompost ha −1 . Grain yields significantly increased on amendment (475, 709, 856, 880, 966 kg ha −1 ) after application of vermicompost at 0, 37, 74, 111, and 148 kg N ha −1 respectively. All the measured parameters reported correlated significantly to grain yields particularly at Site 7 (data not shown), which showed that amending low fertility soils using various combinations of inputs like rhizobia inoculant, Sympal, and vermicompost could enhance soybean growth and yield assuming no In this study, the overall effects of four key factors i.e. site (soil), rhizobia inoculant, starter N (vermicompost or urea), and a legumespecific fertilizer blend (Sympal) and their interactions on soybean productivity traits including nodulation, nodule effectiveness, nodule occupancy, shoot dry weight, N uptake, and yield were evaluated. These productivity traits were improved by various combinations of the three inputs, but in most of the cases there was a significant site or soil effect. Previous studies demonstrated that legume response to inoculation is generally affected by (i) legume genotype, (ii) rhizobia strain, (iii) environmental factors like soil fertility, soil amendments, and water management, and (iv) crop management such as weeding, spacing, pest and disease control (Giller et al., 2013;Woomer et al., 2014;) as well as the nature of existing soil population of rhizobia (Yang et al., 2018). In this study, the focus was on aspects related to soil fertility improvement to enhance soybean productivity traits. The hypothesis that starter N, particularly in organic form, would improve soybean response to rhizobia inoculants and legume specific fertilizer blends (without N) in low fertility soils was confirmed and it is crucial to understanding the underlying mechanisms.The soils used in the three experiments were low in nitrogen levels as reported by findings of Masso et al. (2016). Nitrogen is a major limiting factor in plant growth and development. In low fertility soils, there is a need to explore various nutrient replenishment avenues to establish best practice management options for improved soybean response to inoculation (Woomer et al., 2014). In soils with low nitrogen, a moderate amount of 'starter nitrogen' is required by the legume plant for nodule development, root and shoot growth before the onset of BNF (Herridge et al., 1984;Goi et al., 1993). In the low N soil used in the second greenhouse experiment, amendment with two nitrogen sources (i.e. vermicompost and urea) significantly increased soybean productivity traits suggesting the nitrogen supplied played a role in soybean growth before a symbiotic relationship of the host crop and rhizobia was fully functional. Although insignificant responses of soybean to starter N have been reported (Mendes et al., 2003), positive responses have been reported by several studies (Lamb et al., 1990;Starling et al., 1998;Osborne and Riedell, 2006;Sohrabi et al., 2012;Janagard and Ebadi-Segherloo, 2016) which demonstrates the need of starter N, particularly in low fertility soils as it was the case in this study. There is still a need to determine the threshold value of soil N content (% or g N kg −1 soil) above which, starter N would not be required.The vermicompost treatments performed better in all the measured variables compared to the urea treatments. Although N supplied by urea was readily available for the plant uptake, N alone could not explain the significant increase in the soybean growth traits observed. Vermicompost not only was a source of slow-released N, but also other essential nutrients such as Ca, Mg K among others, which are essential for optimal plant growth. Organic sources of N also improve soil organic carbon, which has a significant effect on soil fertility including rhizobial survival (Swanepoel et al., 2011). In general, soil total N and organic matter are highly correlated as found in this study. In low organic matter soils, organic amendments act as source of nutrients, improve soil structure, increase biodiversity and activity of the microbial population (Albiach et al., 2000;Liu et al., 2008). Use of organic amendments to improve nutrient-depleted soils of SSA regions in general and western Kenyan in particular (Woomer et al., 2014) would improve physical, chemical and biological characteristics of soil (Albiach et al., 2000). This implies that soil amendment with vermicompost, or similar organic inputs, would be a good practice to improve soybean response to inoculation as nodulation and nodule effectiveness were not suppressed up to a rate of 148 kg vermicompost-N ha −1 . Furthermore, use of organic amendments including organic fertilizers in integrated soil fertility management to supply both nutrients and organic matter would be more conducive to sustainability and resilience of the cropping systems than sole application of inorganic fertilizers.Significant variation of soybean response to rhizobial inoculation was observed across the sixty soils under greenhouse conditions, which was confirmed under field conditions at two sites. Success of soybean rhizobia inoculation depends on soil fertility and site location (Date, 2000). Based on recommendations by Tadesse (1991) and the soil analysis results, the study soils from sixty locations in western Kenya had very low to moderate fertility, which was in agreement with the report of Woomer et al. (2014). This wide variation in soil properties with most of the variables falling under low to very low (Okalebo et al., 2002;FAO, 2006) could explain the variation of the soybean response to inoculation. Similar findings of spatial variation of soybean response to rhizobia inoculants across locations was reported by Masso et al. (2016). Edaphic factors such as nutrient P and N availability and soil pH determine the effectiveness of inoculant used (Masso et al., 2015;Yang et al., 2018). This has also been confirmed in our ongoing investigation on the effect of soil acidity and liming on soybean productivity traits under inoculation (unpublished). Soil amendment to improve the fertility including balanced fertilization is therefore crucial to reduce the spatial variability of soybean response to inoculation, assuming no other limiting factors.Under the field conditions, nodule fresh weight and effectiveness were improved by the application of Sympal and/or vermicompost, shoot dry weight was enhanced by co-application of vermicompost, Sympal, and Legumefix, while combination of vermicompost and Sympal increased biomass N uptake and vermicompost boosted grain yield. This was in line with the findings of Mpepereki et al. (2000); Adeli et al. (2005); Mishra et al. (2010); Tahir et al. (2009), andDevi et al. (2013). Soil amendment improved the effectiveness of the nodules and the competitiveness of the introduced strain to occupy a significant number of nodules, as shown by the nodule occupancy. Vermicompost and Sympal contained various nutrients including macro-, secondary and micro-nutrients, which are essential to plant growth and effective nodulation. A package of fertilization interventions based on proper soil fertility diagnosis in legume cropping systems including among others organic inputs, legume-specific fertilizer blend conducive to nodule formation, and rhizobia inoculants found efficacious would be more effective than sole application of a single component of the package (O'Hara et al., 2002;Zhang et al., 2002;Rathke et al., 2005;Sarr et al., 2005;Tahir et al., 2009); though profitability analysis would be required to inform the package choice to recommend. Hence, current development initiatives that promote rhizobia inoculation without necessary soil fertility diagnosis or only focus on co-application of phosphorus and rhizobia inoculants only must be revisited to consider balanced fertilization. Effective legume rhizobia inoculation only adds N to the cropping systems and there is therefore a need to ensure that the other nutrients are available at appropriate levels for optimum plant growth. Availability of essential nutrients as reported by Schulze (2006); Divito and Sadras (2014) and Yoseph and Worku (2014) and moderate levels of nitrogen generally enhance nodule formation and functioning. High rates of nitrogen fertilizers however have been shown to inhibit nodule formation in both controlled and field conditions (Otieno et al., 2007;Ohyama et al., 2011;Bekere et al., 2013;Keino et al., 2015). Hence, investigations to determine the threshold values, depending among others on soil types, below which starter N would be required to improve legume response to inoculation in low fertility soils, are needed.Response to rhizobia inoculation is expected in soils containing few rhizobia or where the compatible rhizobia of the host legume are absent (Abaidoo et al., 2007;Fening and Danso, 2002). The rhizobia populations in the sixty soils were below 1.0 × 10 3 CFU g −1 of soil, which has been reported as the minimal population of native rhizobia for a response to inoculation to be achieved for legume crops like soybean (Thies et al., 1991). The capacity of an inoculant strain to occupy nodules on the host depends on environmental factors such as presence of soil rhizobia and soil type (Thies et al., 1992;Vlassak et al., 1997). The increased nodule weight and shoot biomass over the control due to rhizobia inoculation indicated that the introduced strain was more effective than the indigenous bradyrhizobia that have become established in the soils tested. This was in line with studies of Rahmani and Saleh-Rastin (2001); Bai et al., 2002Bai et al. (2002); Janagard and Ebadi-Segherloo (2016) and Hungria and Mendes (2015) who reported significant increases in nodulation and biomass with rhizobia inoculation. The soybean increased biomass, nodulation and effective nodules due to inoculation confirms the need to inoculate soybean seeds in the soils of the selected sites. Even though the variety TGx1740-2 F is promiscuous, nodule occupancy analysis confirmed successful inoculation. Inoculation with Legumefix significantly increased percentage of effective nodules and nodule occupancy both in greenhouse and field experiment. Nodule effectiveness and occupancy are important indicators of efficient soybean rhizobia symbiosis (Vlassak et al., 1997;Adjei et al., 2002). The yield increase following application of Legumefix at both sites was in line with findings of Egamberdiyeva et al. (2004); Tahir et al. (2009); Hussain et al. (2011) and Ronner et al. (2016). As mentioned above, to optimize soybean response to rhizobia inoculants like Legumefix, soil amendment with organic sources of nutrients and legume-specific fertilizer blend in low fertile soils will be of great importance not only in the Siaya County of Kenya, but also across sub-Sahara Africa where nutrient depletion is widely spread (Liu et al., 2010;Vanlauwe et al., 2015). In addition, there is need to address issues related to factors like legume genotype, efficacy of rhizobia strains, as well as good crop and water management among others.Soil amendment with vermicompost, Legumefix, and Sympal in low fertility soils increased soybeans productivity traits including yields. Soybean response to inoculation was affected by the soil properties. Vermicompost supplied both nutrients and organic carbon, while Sympal contributed additional nutrients, which improved the nutrient status of the low fertility soils and consequently soybean response to inoculation. To fully benefit from BNF development initiatives with legume inoculation components, there is need to consider soil fertility status of the target areas. The technology must seeks to overcome the possible limiting factors to the genetic potential of the legume and rhizobia to be used to fix N. Starter N in the form of vermicompost in low fertility soils at the rates used in this study did not suppress soybean nodulation, and it improved the productivity traits of the crop. However, further investigation is required to determine the threshold value of soil N concentration above which starter N is not recommended when rhizobia inoculants are applied."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3106535879.json b/main/part_2/3106535879.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..935d9d323a9c9ab464afe462682744c3cec86340 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3106535879.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ccecdf30c57c9a627c3abf35eaa51c75","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/dd1588b5-77f6-487f-9bc4-ff1fe3f37b6b/retrieve","id":"1693466136"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"cc0691e7-a7aa-42ae-bf80-2ba73999774d","content":"The study was undertaken jointly by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Knowledge Sharing (KS) Project and the Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative with the objective of improving understanding of the links between human resources policies and practices and a broad set of progressive management approaches that include organizational learning and KS. The study reviewed human resources policies and practices in 12 organizations, six within and six outside the CGIAR, and identified fruitful avenues for improving knowledge sharing and organizational learning throughout the CGIAR system.The study was exploratory in two senses. Firstly, it explored a management area that is relatively new to the CGIAR, and second, it was based on information provided by only a small number of organizations. The six CGIAR centres were: the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and the WorldFish Center. The six non-CGIAR organizations included five international development agencies: Bellanet, the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development of Germany (BMZ), the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the World This Brief reports the results of a study that explored the role of human resources policies and practices in fostering knowledge sharing and organizational learning. The study examined six centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and six organizations that are considered to be leaders in the field of knowledge sharing and organizational learning. Five of these were public or non-governmental and the sixth was a private corporation. All the organizations studied (including the CGIAR centres) are promoting knowledge sharing and organizational learning to some extent, generally in the context of broader organizational change. Some have comprehensive, integrated approaches to organizational change, but most efforts tend to be small-scale, even ad hoc. It is sometimes assumed that CGIAR centres are behind other research and development organizations in knowledge sharing and organizational learning, but our findings indicate that, while most of the centres in the study lack comprehensive strategies, some are actively pursuing promising initiatives from which others can learn. Three key factors seem to influence the success of efforts to foster organizational change through knowledge sharing and organizational learning:• public support from top leaders for such initiatives;• an explicit recognition of they way in which the organization's business strategies are reinforced by knowledge sharing and organizational learning; and• effective internal communication policies and practices that support knowledge sharing and organizational learning.The Brief closes with twelve suggestions for CGIAR managers who wish to engage the human resource management function of their centres for more effective knowledge sharing and organizational learning as well as broader organizational change.Bank; and one private sector corporation, which requested anonymity.Bellanet is housed within the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and its mission is to promote knowledge management and organizational learning in international development organizations. Bellanet aims to support effective development practice by sharing its expertise in information and communication technologies as well as its skills in facilitating organizational learning and the sharing of knowledge.Six of the eight heads of the human resources units or Directors of CGIAR centres were invited to participate in the study and six responded positively. The six non-CGIAR organizations were invited to participate in the study because of their reputation as actively promoting KS and organizational learning. One goal of the study was to determine how far CGIAR centres lag behind the leaders in this field. The study had hoped to include comparisons with more private firms, but this was not possible due to a lack of response. Most of the non-CGIAR organizations were international development organizations that have working contact with the CGIAR.In each of the 12 cases, one or more persons were interviewed by telephone. Individuals were selected because of their intimate knowledgeable of the area under study. Three kinds of corporate documents were also reviewed: a) human resources policies and procedures; b) documents describing efforts to improve KS and organizational learning; and c) statements of organizations' vision, mission, values and strategies. Some of these were obtained from web sites and some from the interviewees.The study findings are reported in relation to the six human resources management dimensions identified in Figure 1.The success of efforts to promote knowledge sharing, organizational learning, innovation and teamwork depends on having the support of senior management. In some organizations (e.g. BMZ, CIDA, SDC and the World Bank), the directors have championed KS and organizational learning for a number of years, and the practices are firmly entrenched in day-to-day operations. Indeed, the mission, vision and strategy of both IWMI and the World Bank are explicitly and directly linked to KS and organizational learning. IWMI's mission statement is clear: 'By 2008, IWMI will be a world-class impact, performance, and service oriented Knowledge Center, specializing in research on Water, Food and Environment'.The Bellanet Secretariat enjoys sufficient top-level support and autonomy within IDRC to be able to innovate in its internal management practices. In many organizations, and in the CGIAR in general, a slow evolution is becoming evident, moving from an exclusive focus on outputs (e.g. publications) towards inclusion of learning from peers and partners, sharing information and investing time in disseminating lessons learned.The strategy documents and mission statements of all 15 CGIAR centres include language that supports and encourages knowledge sharing -referring to innovation, reliance on networks, partnerships and collaboration, generating and disseminating knowledge and technology, sharing knowledge, information exchange and capacity building to position the centres and their partners for success. However, language alone is insufficient. An explicit and operational knowledge management strategy is needed if efforts to become a learning organization are to have an impact on organizational performance.Several aspects of organization and culture were found to influence KS and organizational learning.In all participating organizations, the human resources unit is evolving from performing a purely administrative role to serving a strategic function for senior management. Professional human resources expertise is helping organizations to meet their goals.A community of practice is made up of a group of practitioners who share common interests in a specified discipline or area and volunteer to work together. These communities create tools, documents and processes and share a common vocabulary and ways of working (Rumizen, 2002.) In the Engineering Division of the private business studied, 200 communities of practice have been established during the past 6 years in an effort to promote innovation.These are used by IWMI and SDC to promote sharing of knowledge in both research and administrative areas. The exchange of information fosters collaboration and promotes deeper and broader understanding of what others do. In addition, colleagues are encouraged to talk to each other about their work.Yellow pages and staff directories: Several organizations have installed on-line staff directories to encourage staff to take advantage of in-house expertise. The directories give information about the institutional experience, competencies and areas of expertise of individuals.Organizational culture: When CIAT carried out a 'culture study' (with support from the CGIAR Gender and Diversity Program), one of the main conclusions was that internal communications were poor. CIAT has now looked at the internal communications policies and practices in several well-run organizations and found that each has a sound, formal, internal communications strategy that includes a good induction process for all new staff members.Specialized roles: One of the six CGIAR centres and four of the external organizations have created a 'Chief Knowledge Officer' who reports to the Chief Executive Officer or Director General. This person is responsible for organizing internal consultation among divisions and providing solutions to problems related to knowledge sharing. They undertake knowledge management initiatives and work closely with human resources units to embed KS programs into the policies and practices of the organization.Personnel selection forms used by the private company in recruitment and performance evaluation list 12 required competencies. Four of these (communication, business acumen, change and innovation) are directly related to knowledge sharing and organizational learning.IPGRI has begun to screen prospective employees for specific behavioural competencies that support knowledge sharing alongside more traditional technical competencies. Job profiles and interview questions are based on both technical and 'soft' skills. The process has been well received by selection panels, since it provides a systematic way to assess candidates objectively and it aids equitable treatment of gender and diversity. Support for teams: Teams at the World Bank are supported by 'learning coaches', who help with process issues and problem solving. This formal system enhances team productivity and promotes continuous learning at many levels within the Bank. Organizations are becoming more diverse in terms of language, culture, gender and country of origin. The CGIAR Gender and Diversity Program offers an online course for high performance research teams, which helps promote integration among staff of diverse origins and fills the gap created by limited resources, talent and funding and the desire for fast results.Mentoring: This involves pairing experienced individuals with less experienced ones. Both mentor and 'mentee' benefit from the arrangement and learn from each other and, as a result, the organization is enriched. CIFOR and IWMI have participated in the mentoring initiative sponsored by the Gender and Diversity Program, and ILRI will participate in the same program in 2005. However, at one organization, the program did not flourish because developing staff relations and sharing knowledge were perceived to take valuable time away from research.Organizational learning: At SDC, learning is promoted at all organizational levels and individuals are expected to take responsibility for developing competencies related to their jobs. Unit managers have to identify and secure the competencies they need themselves as well as providing coaching to improve staff competencies, promoting good practices and disseminating lessons learned.Peer assists: These are useful for someone embarking on a new project and are widely used at Bellanet. The person invites colleagues with relevant expertise or experience to a meeting, tells them what the project is about and invites their feedback and advice on how to start the project and any lessons learned from previous similar projects. Peer assist helps get projects off the ground more efficiently and shortens the learning curve. Users of peer assists feel that such meetings have high initial transaction costs but save time in the long run.Review, evaluation and lessons learned: BMZ has implemented afteraction reviews where, after a major event, those involved in its planning meet to review and document lessons learned. These can then be used to improve future events.Procedures for retiring or departing staff: BMZ has developed a 'knowledge bridge' to fill the gap that occurs when people retire. This honours retiring staff at a meeting, at which they also respond to questions posed by their colleagues.Handover procedures: BMZ uses 'handover procedures' to benefit new appointees and promote institutional learning. These emphasise the need to compile high quality and relevant information for new appointees, which, if possible, include two-way questions, answers and discussion and/or detailed handover notes.Most of the organizations studied still focus on evaluating individual performance and struggle with the challenge of how to evaluate team performance. The private sector organization, the World Bank and IWMI all use a technique known as '360-degree' evaluation, which promotes good management and leadership and encourages feedback on managers' performance. The feedback identifies which new skills the managers need to develop, and these are supported by training courses. One of the key goals of 360-degree feedback at the World Bank is to create an environment for learning and knowledge sharing. The technique encourages positive behaviour, such as modelling a blame-free environment that is conducive to learning, sharing knowledge and information, using mistakes as learning opportunities and rewarding knowledge creation and sharing. At BMZ, supervisors use the technique to find out if their staff have the information they need to do their jobs properly.Employee motivation at the World Bank includes on-the-spot monetary awards and an annual team award, presented by the President. The private sector corporation also hosts a team recognition ceremony once a year, while CIDA gives annual team and 'mentor of the year' awards.Research and development organizations -both within and outside the CGIAR -are using KS and organizational learning to improve their overall performance. The World Bank and the private sector company have been working in this area for between 5 and 7 years and their initiatives are well institutionalized. Other organizations, such as BMZ, IWMI and SDC, have been working on KS and organizational learning for shorter periods (2 or 3 years) and their initiatives are less well consolidated. In most of the organizations, the human resources units have supported KS and organizational learning, but have not led these organizational change efforts.Most interviewees in the study believe that human resources policies can contribute significantly to learning and change at the institutional level by fostering KS. However, they note that a number of additional factors are required. They believe that top-management commitment to organizational performance improvement through KS and organizational learning is essential."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3111162253.json b/main/part_2/3111162253.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f3b9c0822eb0d71e1736af4624cd8480615361d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3111162253.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1410d8658e9f736f451304e5d7fb5c7c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/627ad410-fad0-4134-89bf-93ae5cc0ac31/retrieve","id":"-1723630689"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0f01856a-4f28-4f6a-a934-9660dd078445","content":"e-: . ... \" .Las estacas de yuca que se utilizan para la siembra, pierden el poder de enraizamiento, germinación y el vigor de sus yemas con el almacenamiento; además, durante este período las estacas pueden ser afectadas por patógenos y pestes. El conjunto de estos factores conlleva a mermas considerables en el rendimiento de la yuca, principalmente por el número reducido de plantas cosechables.A pesar de ser la mejor práctica, usar material de siembra fresco, el almacenamiento frecuentemente es indispensable por diversas razones: En muchas regiones del mundo la siembra de la yuca sigue los ciclos pluviométricos, con intervalos considerables entre cosecha y siembra. A veces existe escasez de terreno preparado para una siembra inmediata o las condiciones climáticas dificultan la preparación y la siembra. Finalmente, razones económicas pueden obligar al agricultor a cosechar en época no apta para la si~mbra.La ,calidad final de las 'estacas, después del almacenamiento, está determinada por la sanidad y la deshidratación que hayan sufrido. Para conservar mejor la calidad del material de siembra y para reducir pérdidas debidas al almacenamiento inadecuado de estacas se está desarrollando una metodología la cual se discute a continuación.La literatura no es muy concluyente respecto al máximo período posible de almacenamiento de estacas de yuca. En general, se sugiere que sea durante un \"periodo razonable, varios meses o algún tiempo\" (Bertoni, 1945;Conceicao, 1975;Lozano ~ al, 1978: Normanha, 1946;Normanha y Pereira, 1953). Sin embargo, teniendo en cuenta su gran efecto sobre la calidad de las estacas, debe evitarse o reducir el tiempo de almacenamiento al máximo posible. Lozano et al (1977) informan que después de 30 días de almacenamiento de estacas tratadas con los fungicidas B~1 y Captan (Bavistin & Orthocide) se obtuvo excelente enraizamiento, germinación de sus yemas y ninguna reducción en el rendimiento. Krochmae (1969) registró buenos resultados después de períodos de almacenamiento de hasta ocho semanas y Mendes (1946) y Lorenzi (sin publicar 1979) mencionan la posibilidad de corservar material de siembra hasta por cinco meses.Existe una gran diferencia de opinión respecto a las condiciones para la conservación de estacas de yuca. Esto puede ser atribuido a diferencias ambientales, diversas metodologías usadas y a diferencias varietales. Sin embargo, se pueden destacar los siguientes aspectos generales (Silva, 1970;Castellar y Mogollón, 1972;CLAT, 1974;Gartner y Pérez, 1975;ClAT, 1978;Correa y Vieira, 1978): l.El almacenamiento de las estacas de yuca parece ser mejor cuando se hace bajo sombra, pues se reduce la deshidratación y los cambios extremos de temperatura.El ambiente para el almacenamiento debe tener una humedad relativa mayor del 80%, pero sin ser excesiva (cercana a la saturación); las temperaturas no deben ser extremadamente bajas o altas. El punto térmico limite que inactiva la germinación de las yemas de estacas de yuca maduras es de 52.5°C.La posición vertical u horizontal de la estaca durante el almacenamiento, no afecta el grado de conservación de ésta ni la germinación de las yemas. Sin embargo, parece que cuando las estacas se almacenan en posición vertical, con las yemas invertidas, la germinación de éstas se retrasa después de la siembra.El enraizamiento de la estaca y la germinación de sus yemas durante el almacenamiento, no indica necesariamente mal conservación.Las estacas largas (1.0 m) parecen conservarse mejor durante períodos prolongados, que las estacas cortas (0.20m).Sólo estacas maduras, provenientes de plantaciones sanas, deben usarse para almacenar.Las diferencias varietales, en cuanto a su capacidad de almacenamiento, se acentúan a medida que se prolonga el periodo de almacenamiento.Se evaluaron diferentes sistemas y duraciones de almacenamiento usando la variedad Q1C 76, una buena germinadora. Todo el material se trató con B01 y Captan a razón de 3000 ppm I.A. El proceso de germi-El rendimiento de ralees fre sca s fue afectado t anto por la duración como por las condiciones de almacenamiento (Cuadro 1). El rendimiento disminuyó como consecuencia de periodos más l a r gos de almacenamiento en todas las condiciones, pero la reducción fue más drástica bajo condiciones no adecuadas de almacenamiento. El efecto de duración, de la condición y su interacción fueron altamente significativos (P•O.OOl) indicando que a medida que se prolonga el período de almacenamiento, ganan en importancia las condiciones bajo las cuales se guarda el material de siembra.Cuando la germinación fue afectada por condiciones inapropiadas de almacenamiento la población final 2 (a la cosecha) fue el factor de mayor influencia en el rendimiento R aQ.90***). En bamcio, con germinación y población final completa, una gran parte de la ~ariación en el rendimiento no se pudo explicar con este parámetro (R aQ.42n.s.). Esto indica que además del factor \"población\" otros factores, posiblemente relativos a la disponibilidad de reservas en las e s tacas al momento de la siembra, determinan el rendimiento de plantaciones de yuca sembradas con estacas almacenadas (Figura 2). Como consecue ncia del almacenamiento, se observó una reducción en el número de ralees totales y ralees comerciales (Cuadro 2). Plantas con menos ralees aparentemente trataron de compensar incrementando el tam~no de l a s ralees, sin embargo el aumento no fue suficiente para estabilizar el rendimiento. Siendo estadlsticamente significativo (R2=0.80***) la reducción en el número de ralees por planta explica parte de la pérdida en el rendimiento.Los resultados y observaciones obtenidos hasta el presente permiten las siguientes conclusiones:1. . El factor de mayor importancia en la reducción de los rendimientos de yuca como consecuencia del almacenamiento de las estacas es la pérdida del poder germinativo de éstas debido a su deshidratación, infestación por patógenos u otras influencias adversas sufridas durante el almacenamiento. La germinación reducida se manifiesta en una población deficiente al momento de la cosecha.En condiciones adecuadas de almacenamiento y con tratamiento qu!mico,las estacas de yuca pueden ser cons ervadas por varios meses, obteniendo altos porcentajes de germinación.En climas tropicales, el almacenamiento del material de siembra en un ambiente sombreado, fre sco y moderadamente humedo resulta m más favorable que el almacenamiento en bodega. f Esto hace precindible el uso de construcciones costosas.e-5 74.Entre más prolongado sea el almacenamiento, más críticas eon las condiciones bajo las cuales se almacenan las estacas.A pesar de conservar el material de siembra en bpen estado y obtener germinación completa, se observan reducciones en el rendimiento a causa del almacenamiento prolongado. Estas reducciones que no se explican con poblaciones reducidas a la cosecha, son posiblemente causadas por otrps factores afectando tanto la formación del sistema radicular como el desarrollo de la parte aerea de la planta. Se manifiestan en un reducido número de raíces gruesas por planta.La identificación y evaluación más detallada de estos factores permitirá establecer prácticas de manejo del material de siembra que además de preservar su germinación también permitirán de reducir las pérdidas del rendimiento debidas a prolongados períodos de almacenamiento.CUADRO l. Efecto de las condiciones y periodo de almacenamiento del material de siembra sobre la población final y el rendimiento de raíces. Variedad Q1C76, ClAT, 1979.Cuarto seco, estaca de lm, ver~ ti cal Campo abierto, sombra, base de madera, estacas de lm, horizontal Campo abierto, sombra, estacas de lm, vertical, en el suelo Silo de tierra, estacas de lm cubierta plástica, horizontal Silo de tierra, estaca de 20 cm, cubierta plástica, horizontal "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3117191323.json b/main/part_2/3117191323.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..adc6bbaaae19dfd3e8fa62e7c7bafed1cde805c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3117191323.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b3174cb840adc962fb651749798c6344","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ba2b1cce-633a-4e26-b072-ba8d7fa97723/retrieve","id":"1899397896"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e0643103-92c9-4cc0-a50d-10b7c3efcdfd","content":"During 2014, MAIZE made strong progress on both of its research strategies, stress resilient and nutritious maize and sustainable intensification of maize-based systems. In total, 70 maize varieties were released through MAIZE partners; 48 in eastern, southern and western Africa; 14 in Mexico, one in Columbia; 7 in Asia (Nepal 4 and Afghanistan 3). Some of the key traits stacked in these varieties include: drought tolerance, nitrogen use efficiency, tar spot resistance, increased Provitamin A content (linked to the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health -A4NH CRP), ear rot or mycotoxin resistance, and Turcicum leaf blight resistance (see Figure 1 MAIZE and its partners continued to spearhead efforts to combat the emergence of Maize Lethal Necrosis (MLN) as a major challenge to the maize sector in Eastern Africa since 2011. MAIZE works closely with both public and private sector partners to identify/develop and deliver new sources of resistance to MLN. Among new CGIAR-derived products, UH5354, was released by the National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) in Uganda, and commercialized via the Nalweyo Seed Company (NASECO). In Kenya, H12ML, an elite hybrid with MLN tolerance was produced by Kenya Seed Company. Three more MLN tolerant elite maize hybrids are scheduled for release in 2015. Large-scale phenotypical screening at the MLN Screening Facility established with the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) at Naivasha, Kenya and the use of facility by partners gained momentum in 2014.The Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) project supported the commercial release of 33 new droughttolerant varieties, totaling 160 new varieties since 2007 and facilitated the production of more than 40,000 metric tons (MT) of certified seed, sufficient to plant 1.6 -2 million hectares. In two years of the Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA) Deployment Phase II, 36 hybrids have been approved for commercialization through 23 seed companies in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and South Africa; 28.4 tons of foundation seed has been produced. The Improved Maize for African Soils (IMAS) project submitted 7 hybrids for release that combine MLN tolerance with performance under low N. In Latin America, three Tar Spot resistant hybrids were released through partners in Mexico in 2014. Three Tar Spot resistant hybrids are scheduled to be released in Guatemala (2) and in Honduras (1) in 2015. In 2014, the Heat Tolerant Maize for Asia (HTMA) project in Asia generated 24 hybrids that were taken forward for large-scale adaptive trials followed by scaling-out in all four partnering countries, including India, Nepal, Pakistan and Bangladesh. At least 5 hybrids in Bangladesh and 4 hybrids in Nepal are identified by national program and seed producers for formal registration and advanced to deployment.The Sustainable Intensification strategy in MAIZE addresses challenges to maize-based farming systems through an increasing number of innovation platforms (51 in Africa, 40 in South Asia and 41 in Latin America); which aim to strengthen multi-stakeholder collaboration in Latin America, Africa and Asia. To achieve impact at scale and proposing site and farm specific integrated adoptable solutions requires the use of systems research approaches and the development and use of conceptual frameworks. An example of this is MAIZE's partnership with Wageningen University. Given the increased use of Innovation Platforms for iterative learning and scaling-up and scaling out new technologies and approaches, collaboration with the Royal Tropical Institute (KIT) expanded in 2014 to include capacity strengthening of MAIZE partners in Agricultural Innovation Systems thinking and application. In 2014, a new project was launched that combined the systems work of Wageningen with the Innovation Platform work of KIT. \"Enhancing the effectiveness of systems analysis tools to support learning and innovation in multi-stakeholder platforms\" will inform the lines of work for up to four pilot sites in Zambia (Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume cropping systems for food security in Eastern and Southern Africa -SIMLEZA-Africa Rising), Mexico (Sustainable Modernization of Traditional Agriculture program -MasAgro), Ethiopia (Farm Mechanization and Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Intensification -FACASI) and South Asia (Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia -CSISA).Among sustainable intensification options, Thierfelder et al. (2014) studied yield response of maize to conservation agriculture (CA) in southern Africa, discovering yield advantages of 1152 kg/ha and 1172 kg/ha in two manual CA systems in Malawi, planted with a dibble stick with sole maize and maize-legume intercropping, respectively. Another study found that DSSAT crop simulation models can be a useful tool to help project future weather effects of climate change on yield, economic returns and risk in conventional tillage (CT) and CA systems, helping farmers to make better informed adoption decisions.A study by the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI), funded by a MAIZE competitive grant initiative, found that the Nutrient Expert® fertilizer decision support tool operated by extension workers improved maize yields by 40 percent, and up to 60 percent for marginalized women farmers.In Sub-Saharan Africa, trials showed that a bio-herbicide Foxy2 in combination with Striga-resistant varieties increased grain yield by 1.4 t/ha in on-farm trials, with a net benefit of US$722/ha. The bio-herbicide does not produce known mycotoxins that pose health risks to farmers, attacks all growth stages of Striga, and is compatible with other complementary technologies for Striga control. Molecular detection tools specific to Foxy2 have been developed that unequivocally differentiate the bio-control agent from other pathogenic and mycotoxin-producing fungi. This year also saw funding commitment to and progress on the Cross-CRP Global Study on Gender Norms, Agency and Innovation in Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. MAIZE and WHEAT contributed over US$500,000 in 2014 and will invest the same again in 2015, with data collection already complete for more than 19 out of the 70+ case studies.In October 2014, the 12th Asian Maize Conference was jointly organized by the Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI), the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the Department of Agriculture (DOA)-Thailand at Bangkok, Thailand. The conference, co-sponsored by MAIZE, attracted the participation of nearly 300 stakeholders from 30 countries, including researchers, policy makers, service providers, innovative farmers and representatives of various public and private organizations. The discussions led to 15 specific recommendations for MAIZE Phase 2, capturing the stakeholder priorities, especially for doubling maize production and productivity in the region and strengthening maize value chains.Last but not least, the MAIZE Independent Evaluation Arrangement (IEA) has been very positive, with the Evaluation Team considering it \"highly plausible that MAIZE and its partners will reach the medium term goal, which is to increase maize productivity in the two MAIZE target groups by 7 percent in 2020 and 33 percent in 2030.\" Over 4 million farmers are estimated to have benefited from MAIZE research outputs in 2014. 1 MAIZE technologies have been applied by farmers on at least 2.3 million ha of land as direct result of CRP projects 2 . 1 Evidence based on key bilateral project progress reports and performance information collected in various institutional databases. The key geographic countries in which the adoption has been observed include: Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Malawi, Mali, Mexico, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, Uganda and Zimbabwe. 2 Use of germplasm by third parties has an additional impact not measured in this report.Based on CIMMYT germplasm, UH5354 (registered by NARO), an MLN-tolerant variety, was released in 2014, and is being commercialized by NASECO. H12M1, another MLN-tolerant maize hybrid, was released in 2014 and is being produced by Kenya Seed Company. Two more MLN-tolerant elite hybrids are in the pipeline for commercialization -H13M2 in Kenya (registered by Kenya Seed Company) and HB607 in Tanzania (registered by Meru-Agro) that were recommended for release in 2014, and UH5558 in Uganda (registered by NARO) that is recommended for release in 2015.An MLN quarantine facility will be established by CIMMYT in Harare to ensure safe introduction of improved maize germplasm from CIMMYT-Kenya, and for continued germplasm support to public and private institutions in southern Africa. A MAIZE competitive grant project implemented by the International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) is investigating MLN insect vector dynamics. Through another MAIZE project, the Federal University of Technology, Nigeria, supported by IITA, is making proactive efforts to prevent the potential spread of MLN in Western and Central Africa.Guided by the MAIZE Gender Strategy and Gender Audit, in 2012 to 2014, MAIZE considerably increased investments in strategic gender research, internal capacity-building and mainstreaming gender-responsiveness into an increasing number of projects. MAIZE gender experts are co-leading the Cross-CRP Global Study on Gender Norms, Agency and Innovation in Agriculture and Natural Resource Management, in short referred to as 'Gennovate'. MAIZE and WHEAT contributed over US$500,000 in 2014 and will invest the same again in 2015, with data collection already complete for more than 19 out of the 70+ case studies. MAIZE is helping to secure funds for the critical analysis and write-up phase that lies ahead. In each country a local field team is trained, contributing significantly to local capacity-building in qualitative social research approaches.Other key investments include the KIT-led \"Gender Matters in Farm Power\" project to analyze the opportunities to empower both women and men small-scale farmers through appropriate-scale mechanization in the FACASI project. A recent assessment of maize varietal preferences of men and women farmers in West Africa explored important similarities and differences among male and female farmers. Cultural Practice LLC was commissioned to design and implement a gender competency framework and modular capacitystrengthening program for MAIZE. This Annual Report highlights achievements aligned with the three research strategies. Significant progress was made towards the delivery of 2014 outputs, achieving overall more than 89 percent of the outputs planned in the 2014 POWB. The CRP ranged from 79 percent for FP 4 to 90 percent and above for FP 1, FP 2, FP 3 and FP 5. The 79 percent of the FP 4 is due to a slower than expected performance of the competitive partner grants (Annex 1).Percentage completion was less than 100 percent due to: a) unforeseen circumstances; b) budget insecurities experienced for W1&W2; and c) difficulties experienced by some MAIZE Competitive Grants Initiative (CGI) partners in meeting the exacting schedules for contracted deliverables. In Mexico, studies in Guanajuato in the frame of the MasAgro project found that GreenSeeker technology saves farmers 50 kg units of nitrogen per hectare without sacrificing yield. MasAgro continues to adapt locallyavailable machinery to save on inputs through greater precision, such as the \"Happy Seeder\" technology imported from South Asia. The MasAgro Móvil project saw a 200 percent increase in users (3,148 current total) of its weather and agricultural recommendation text message service.In ESA, an IPNI study was funded by the MAIZE CGI, finding that the Nutrient Expert® fertilizer decision support tool operated by extension workers improved maize yields by 40 percent, and up to 60 percent for marginalized women farmers. Using a gender-informed approach, 50 percent of the 102 extension workers trained were women, as were 40 percent of the 1,200 farmer participants in on-farm demonstrations.In India, weaker and erratic monsoons, patchy irrigation services, depleting water tables and labor demands favor monsoon maize as a food security solution, but the predicted increase of drought and flooding events due to climate change are obstacles. In four successive years, demonstrations at Bihar in the frame of the CSISA project showed that bed planting of hybrid monsoon maize outperformed other options due to improved soil drainage (4.8 t/ha compared to 4.0 t/ha planted on the flat in 2014), while at Karnal, zero-till maize outperformed rice while using 90 percent less irrigation water. Twenty existing commercial and pipeline elite hybrids with a higher germination rate (80 percent) under drought anaerobic stress have been identified and shared with the private sector. Breeding efforts are also responding to this need: in 2014 a genomic region was identified as being strongly associated with combined drought and waterlogging tolerance for potential marker-assisted selection, along with two others that can be used selectively for each trait.MAIZE is market-driven and invests heavily in the development of maize lines and varieties that possess key traits demanded by farmers, their families and the processors and urban consumers of maize. Key biotic and abiotic threats are prioritized, and 'hidden' nutritional traits are developed and advocated. Private sector collaboration and capacity building is key to this approach.Developing and deploying climate-resilient maize through PPPs Africa -The DTMA project facilitated the production of more than 40,000 MT of certified seed in 2014, and supported Ethiopia to replace two hybrids that have dominated the maize sector for over 20 years. Within the first two years of WEMA Phase II, as many as 36 hybrids have been approved for commercialization through 23 seed companies in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and South Africa; 28.4 tons of foundation seed has been produced to help them reach the target of 2,000 tons of certified seed. Monsanto is assisting by bulking pre-foundation seed for 35 lines to jumpstart commercialization, and working with the African Agricultural Technology Foundation (AATF) to establish the Foundation Seed Crop Plan System. Collaboration between WEMA, DTMA and IMAS has grown through a joint monitoring and evaluation working group as well as coordinated regional on-station and onfarm variety trials. These collaborations culminated in the DTMASS (Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa Seed Scaling) project, funded by USAID, for scaling-up and delivering improved maize seed in seven countries in ESA.4Asia -The Affordable, Accessible, Asian (AAA) Drought Tolerant Maize Project is a partnership between CIMMYT, Syngenta and NARS in Indonesia and Vietnam. In this project, funded by SFSA, CIMMYT's droughttolerant germplasm adapted to Asia is being combined with Syngenta's elite germplasm for generating drought-tolerant three-way cross hybrids, besides hybrids derived using only CIMMYT's drought tolerant parental lines. The project combines complementary breeding technologies, development of phenotyping facilities, and comparative advantages of partners to develop and deliver improved stress resilient maize varieties for stress-prone smallholder farmers in marginal environments in Asia. A set of five promising AAA three-way cross hybrids will be deployed in the dry belt of Central India, where they outperformed the best check by up to a ton per hectare in terms of grain yield; five potential private sector partners will perform large-scale evaluation of these hybrids in 2015.The HTMA project, funded by USAID, is being implemented in Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal and Pakistan. The project is designed to develop and deploy heat-tolerant elite maize hybrids through public-private partnerships. By the end of the second year (September 2014), a set of 24 first-generation hybrids were identified and taken forward for large-scale adaptive trials, and for potential scaling-out in the partner countries. At least 5 hybrids in Bangladesh and 4 hybrids in Nepal have been identified by the respective national program and seed producers for formal registration and deployment. The project builds on publicprivate partnerships, including seven public sector partners and three seed companies. New public-private partnerships (involving local seed companies) are also envisioned in each country for effective deployment of heat tolerant maize hybrids. For example: in Bangladesh, four seed companies submitted a request for partnering with Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) and CIMMYT, for hybrid licensing and deployment. Similar partnerships are also being built in India, Nepal and Pakistan.The IMAS phenotyping network expanded to over 120,000 research plots at 25 locations in 10 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa; 20 percent of these phenotyping locations are at private sector research stations. A large population of DH lines derived through IMAS project has greatly accelerated breeding progress. In 2014, three confined field trial (CFT) sites for testing NUE transgenics were in advanced stage of certification by regulatory agencies. Forty-one new three-way cross hybrids were submitted for release in partnership with private sector seed companies in 10 ESA countries, along with 7 hybrids combining MLN tolerance with low N tolerance. Closer alignment with DTMA and WEMA projects is enabling more 4 DTMASS aims to facilitate the production of close to 12,000 MT of certified seed of drought tolerant maize varieties in the seven countries by end of the fifth year from the start of the project, benefiting approximately 400,000 households or 2.5 million people through increased production and productivity of maize and increased adoption of improved seed. The project has established strong partnerships with private and public seed companies, community-based organizations, NGOs and national extension systems to achieve its mission; a total of 53 seed companies have signed up to scale up 71 drought tolerant varieties.efficient identification and dissemination of elite products with improved grain yield under water deficit and nitrogen limiting conditions.In response to the growing threat of TSC infection, resistance screening began in 2010 in several hotspots in Mexico, Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala, identifying several promising experimental hybrids. In 2014, MAIZE partners released three TSC-resistant maize hybrids in Mexico, with a further three resistant hybrids (two in Guatemala and one in Honduras) scheduled for release in 2015.DH technology has fast-tracked the development of breeding populations from the TSC-resistant variety CLWN247 in Mexico. Genotyping-by-sequencing was conducted at Cornell University through the Genomic Diversity Facility; genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis led to the identification of SNP variants responsible for Tar Spot resistance, and a priori candidate gene mining via enrichment analysis was also conducted. Two highly-resistant Maize Germplasm Bank accessions identified in the phenotypic trials have been crossed and backcrossed with appropriate CML lines to both improve them for root lodging, a major defect in these resistant open pollinated populations; and in parallel to enhance disease resistance of elite CML lines. Select open pollinated germplasm produced via this process will be provided to farmers in Tar Spot disease endemic areas after evaluation for disease resistance, agronomic performance and client acceptability.Early generation lines with upward of 75 percent CML background will be made available to breeders to use to enhance Tar Spot Resistance of both elite breeding lines for variety development.MAIZE and partners are also developing integrated tar spot management strategies for farmers, and are investigating the interplay between TSC and conservation agriculture.The Nutritious Maize for Ethiopia (NuME) project works to bring QPM to rural maize producers in Ethiopia, holding 1000 field days and QPM demonstration activities in 2014 and presenting two QPM hybrids, QHYB-1 and T QHYB-2, to the variety release committee. Their work has been greatly supported by the Ethiopian government's decision to plant at least 10 percent of all maize fields in Ethiopia with QPM in the next three years, an initiative created to demonstrate, popularize and promote QPM varieties as well as the potential of QPM as part of a balanced diet for smallholder farmers and urban dwellers, and for use in the food processing industry, livestock sector and export market.A total of 36 studies to assess maize adoption and impact pathways in Africa, Mexico, Nepal and India were published in 2014, providing crucial information for project planning, targeting and evaluation. Gender: Fisher and Kandiwa (2014) found that women farmers were 11 percent less likely to adopt modern maize varieties than their male counterparts. The receipt of a seed and fertilizer subsidy increased the probability of adoption by 222 percent for female heads of household, suggesting that programs such as the Malawian Farm Input Subsidy Program had reduced the gender gap in improved variety adoption. Kassie et al.(2014b) demonstrated a gap between male-and female-headed households in food security, with female headed households less food-secure than male headed households due to unobservable characteristics.In 2014, more than 135 tons of the aflatoxin bio-control agent Aflasafe TM were produced in IITA's Nigeria-based production unit, enough for deployment in 13,540 hectares. Of this, 118 tons were destined for Nigeria, 11 for Senegal, 3.4 for Zambia, and 1 each for Gambia, Ghana and Mozambique. Initial data from a separate study in Nigeria showed that farmers will receive a return of from 20 to 60 percent on investment in Aflasafe TM . Currently, MAIZE supports Aspergillus strain identification/collection in Burkina Faso, Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania and Malawi. The number of countries requesting Aflasafe TM continues to expand, and in Kenya a new Aflasafe TM production plant is scheduled to be constructed in 2015.During 2014, the Integrated Striga Management for Africa (ISMA) Project directly reached over 270,000 smallholder farmers in northern Nigeria, and 120,000 in western Kenya, with maize varieties that produce grain yields up to 126 percent higher under Striga infestation, as compared to vulnerable commercial checks. A total of 112 tons of certified Imizapyr resistant (IR)-maize seed was produced by two seed companies in Kenya in 2014. IR-maize is conventionally bred herbicide resistant maize varieties combined with Imizapyr, an herbicidal seed coating. Also, in partnership with community based seed producers and private sector seed companies, about 1,243 tons of seed of Striga-resistant maize and 300 tons of Striga-resistant cowpea have been produced and disseminated to farmers in Nigeria through community, government, and commercial channels. Trials in the last three years showed that the bio-herbicide Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. strigae (Foxy2) in combination with Striga-resistant varieties increased grain yield by 1.4 t/ha in on-farm trials, with a net benefit of US$722/ha. This bio-herbicide does not produce known mycotoxins that pose health risks to farmers, attacks all growth stages of Striga, and is compatible with other complementary technologies for Striga control. Molecular detection tools specific to Foxy2 have been developed that unequivocally differentiate the bio-control agent from other pathogenic and mycotoxin-producing fungi.The CSISA project supports a network of more than 1,700 mechanized service providers (or 'change agent intermediary') across India. Service Providers offer agricultural custom-hire services to farmers at affordable rates; for example, charging $14.35 (Rs. 910) per hour for the tiller and $15.78 (Rs. 1,000) per hour for the Mould Board plow. These service providers bring the benefits of modern agricultural mechanization even to the smallest farmers.In 2014, MasAgro reached over 200,000 farmers directly and benefitted more than 600,000 people. Farmers witnessed a 17 percent average increase in maize yields; increasing farm incomes by up to 30 percent. The program is now present in 30 states of Mexico. Data on 36,000 maize farmers was collected to improve targeting and technical support, and a survey of 24 local seed companies selling MasAgro hybrids found that they had sold enough hybrid seed to cultivate over 760,000 hectares in 2014, increasing sales 46 percent from 2011 to 2014 From 14.5 tons of basic seed and 26 tons of pre/commercial seed distributed by MasAgro, its network of 33 small-and medium-sized seed companies produced over 1.92 million kg of 26 new hybrids.In addition to the research achievements highlighted in A.2 and C.1 ('Gennovate', KIT study into gender and mechanization), efforts to integrate gender considerations in participatory varietal selection continued in 2014 and as part of the seed system portfolio, a special study on gender as a customer attribute was implemented and a draft gender strategy for maize seed system development developed. Initiatives to integrate gender considerations in advisory service provision, small-scale entrepreneurship and conservation agriculture have continued.In 2014, a study on gender and post-harvest management technologies was carried out in four countries of SSA, while MAIZE and WHEAT carried out a study to identify avenues to improve gender equality and empower women professionals in research. The write-ups for both studies are expected in 2015.A revised version of the MAIZE gender strategy was developed and endorsed by the MAIZE management committee in November 2014. Scientists and research teams are increasingly demanding gender inputs and attempting to integrate gender considerations in maize research-for-development (R4D). Nevertheless, numerous challenges remain, particularly in relation to bilateral funding and insecurity in W1&2 funding, which significantly limits the basis to increase number of CRP gender staff and consultants.Gender performance self-assessment as per Annex 2: approaching requirements.Given the strength of downstream partnerships funded predominantly via bilateral projects, MAIZE continues to strengthen strategic upstream partnerships. MAIZE We continue to get a very strong and positive response to MAIZE competitive grants and allocate them on an annual basis, based on mid-year announcements. Allocation towards the end of the year allows better management of fluctuating W&W2 budgets offering substantial opportunities to invest in promising partner collaborations both within and outside the CGIAR. This is outlined in Sections C1 and C2.MAIZE CRP provides a large range of services related to the maize product development chain and conservation agriculture practices to its partners at all levels, promoting individual and organizational empowerment. In 2014, over 30,000 individuals (33 percent female) received technical backstopping and capacity-building. Technical backstopping includes: breeding support, variety testing and registration, and guidance on production of breeders' seed, pre-basic, basic and certified seed, farmers' field days, intercommunity exchanges and events on product deployment and production. Over 3,800 individuals (45 percent women) were involved in capacity-development activities on germplasm development and production in 2014 alone.MAIZE works through an extensive network of private companies. In 2014, the International Maize Improvement Consortium (IMIC)-Asia worked with over 35 SME seed companies. In Mexico, 68 SME partners contribute to over 155 testing sites under MasAgro. In Africa, 72 small, 12 medium and 1 large national enterprises, 3 regional and 1 international companies partner under MAIZE across 13 countries. As a result of capacity-building, 24 SMEs in Mexico increased their sales by 46 percent in 2011-2014, while some SMEs in Tanzania and Uganda have tripled seed production and delivery of improved maize varieties in the last 2 years.In 2014, a risk management matrix was created to regularly assess and manage risks related to the delivery of results by the CRP. The three major risks identified were: (1) W1&W2 budget insecurity and delayed transfer of W1&2 funds, which directly affects CRP research and development operations; (2) unfulfilled obligations by the partners for commissioned and competitive grants; (3) lack of a systematic and integrated approach for monitoring and evaluation at the outcome level.To mitigate risk (1), the CRP Management Committee gives priority to multi-year investments of centers and partners, and uses the issuing of new partner grants as the most flexible component of the budget. MAIZE continues to sign only one-year partner grant contracts, to manage partner expectations and minimize any delays of payments to them. For risk (2), MAIZE regularly monitors the fulfillment of obligations by partners and intervenes when necessary to ensure proper completion of grant requirements. As for risk (3), the MAIZE and WHEAT have hired a shared Senior Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Specialist to strengthen the CRP monitoring and evaluation system. A number of CIMMYT initiatives were also identified to contribute to minimizing risk, including the implementation of the Research Management System.The information reported in Annex 1 is obtained from detailed data found in a variety of sources, including project technical reports and institutional databases. The program is confident in the quality of the indicator information supplied. However, the program will continue to improve the systematic approach to collecting the quantitative evidence and other types of performance indicators from across the program to improve the process and time required to collect and analyze the information.MAIZE reorganized its strategy around five Flagship Projects in 2014, following a standardization of CRP structure, reflected in Table 1 under indicators 1, 2 and 3. MAIZE endorses the positions of other CRPs on the need for clarified definitions of some indicators to support consistent and reliable reporting across CRPs.Notwithstanding the many positive outcomes achieved by the CRP, additional efforts are needed to improve project management, monitoring and evaluation quality at both the project and program levels.MAIZE developed a standardized process and associated tools for project planning and design in 2014, including clear roles and responsibilities for each step and decision. It has also identified key steps where inputs from specialists (e.g. gender, monitoring and evaluation, communications) are effectively integrated in CRP management.The CRP foresees a number of future efforts to support project and program management, including capacity building in the development of theories of change, impact pathways and monitoring and evaluation plans, and development and implementation of a monitoring, evaluation and learning strategy.There are 9 financial reports: 5 An explanatory note for this item is forthcoming 6 An explanatory note for this item is being preparedThe traffic light indicator sums up the progress achieved of projects under MAIZE, per flagship project in 2014, regardless of their funding (Windows 1& 2 or bilateral funded). It monitors the progress per FP output, per FP and for the CRP as a whole.Overall MAIZE performance was 85% on annual milestones/deliverables associated with FP outputs based on projects reported. Despite a number of smaller delays, which are being tracked, no significant issues were reported. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3123411038.json b/main/part_2/3123411038.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f285ee4f1fdbccd81d4979d60dfa435a90ba5890 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3123411038.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b3b856513bdeaddb3a2c6d3303cebb2a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e00fbab8-71e3-4b0a-b066-8e1b474c0e8a/retrieve","id":"1822275250"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2e275a7a-4d3f-4611-9bb6-e9e7d4f92d17","content":"Description of the innovation: Rice Crop Manager (RCM) is a decision-making tool designed for use by extension workers, crop advisors, agricultural service providers, and farmer leaders who use RCM through the web browser of a personal computer, tablet, or smartphone. After the interview, collected information can be stored on the computer, tablet, or smartphone until the device is connected to the Internet through a web browser. Each guideline provides an actionable recommendation, with location-specific cropping practices."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3135734293.json b/main/part_2/3135734293.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b0f07a2c0939b61928ed7ea86849ac7abd9c6e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3135734293.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f2c54ec957d83b04281e57116fb32743","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://data.cimmyt.org/api/access/datafile/:persistentId/?persistentId=hdl:11529/10548767/1","id":"299773026"},"keywords":["Biological yield","Nitrogen uptake","Permanent bed","Yield attributes"],"sieverID":"75ad8040-946d-48e5-8be6-050d577aeb10","content":"A field experiment was conducted in maize under medium-term conservation agriculture (CA) based maizewheat system at BISA-CIMMYT, Ladhowal, Punjab during kharif 2019 to assess the effect of CA+ practices (CA with sub-surface drip irrigation) with variable N doses on maize. The CA+ treatments were residue retained (WR) permanent bed (PB) with sub-surface drip fertigation (PB-SSD): without N (N0), 120 kg N/ha,150 kg N/ha applied in 4-equal (Eq) and differential splits (Df); CA alone treatment includ PB furrow irrigation with 120 kg N/ha (PBWR-Furrow-N120); conventional tillage (CT) involved furrow irrigation with 120 kg N/ha (CTWOR-Furrow-N120) and other treatments were residue removed (WOR) PB: PBWOR-without N (N0), with 120 kg N/ha, and 150 kg N/ha applied in four Eq-splits and Df-splits. The findings of the present experiment showed that the numerical value of yield attributing characters were higher under CA+ plots as compared to CA alone (PBWR-Furrow-N120) and CT (CTWOR-Furrow-N120). Biological yield of maize was significantly higher in all CA+ plots as compared to CA alone and CT plots. Highest biological yield was recorded under PBWR-SSD-N150 Df (23.45 t/ha). Highest no. of cobs (72800/ha), no. of grains/cob (605) and cob length (22.61cm) along with dry matter resulted highest biological yield in PBWR-SSD-N150 plots. The grain N content remained statistically similar across all the N management plots, but in case of total N uptake, PBWR-SSD-N150 Df (CA+) plots dominated due to higher biomass. Besides, CA+ based PBWR-SSD-N120 (average of Df and Eq) registered 23-24% higher total N uptake than CA alone (PBWR-Furrow-N120) and conventional (CTWOR-Furrow-N120) plots. Improved agronomic N use-efficiency was also recorded under CA+ plots as compared to CA alone (36.4 kg/kg N) and CT (36.7 kg/kg N) plots.Maize-wheat (MW) system is third most important cropping system (~1.86 Mha) and has potential to expand in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) (Jat et al. 2019). MW system with conservation based (CA) based practices have twin benefits of superior food and fodder supply as well as enhanced soil health (Parihar et al. 2016). Precise water management through micro-irrigation/drip irrigation has shown numerous benefits in terms of irrigation water savings, increase in yield and quality, and nutrient use-efficiency in horticulture and vegetable crops (Mohammad 2015). To address the water scarcity problem, nowadays surface drip irrigation has been evaluated as a viable option for the wide spaced cereals like maize (Lamm et al. 1997), rice and wheat (Sharda et al. 2017). To deal with this bottleneck and better farmers' ease for acceptance of drip irrigation in cereal-based systems, sub-surface drip irrigation (SSDI) can be a way forward. In contrast to surface drip irrigation, SSDI system restricts further evaporation losses from the soil surface, facilitate the delivery of water and nutrients directly to the root zone that leads to efficient water use, reduces weed emergence, labor cost, and allows seeding with CA-based no-tillage practices (Sidhu et al. 2019).Along with efficient water management, precise nitrogen (N) application directly to the crop root zone through SSDI may open a new avenue for N management in the context of CA in crops like maize over conventional broadcasting, as large amount of split applied broadcasted N remains over crop residues thereby it undergoes losses particularly through volatilization and microbial immobilization. Fertigation through SSDI system reduces the losses of N through volatilization and leaching thereby enhances the nutrient use-efficiency Hagin et al. (2003). But information on optimization of rate and time of N application through sub-surface drip fertigation (SSDF) and their impact on N use-efficiency in maize under CA-based MW system is lacking in India. Therefore, keeping above facts in mind the present study was planned and carried out to evaluate the effects of residue management and sub-surface drip fertigation on crop performance and N use-efficiency of maize under CA-based MW system.The field experiment was conducted during kharif 2019 at BISA-CIMMYT, Ladhowal (30.99°N latitude, 75.44°E longitude, 229 m ASL), Punjab, India. The region is characterized by a sub-tropical and semi-arid climate with annual rainfall of 734 mm. The total amount of rainfall acived during the crop growing season (20 th June, 2019 to 13 th October, 2019) was 488.22 mm. The soils of this region basically are of alluvial in origin, flat and well drained sandy loam soil.Installation of sub-surface drip irrigation system: Polythene made laterals with 16 mm inner diameter were laid parallel to crop rows at 20 cm soil depth. Laterals consist of line-source emitters spaced at 30 cm interval with 2 litres/hour discharge capacity (at 135 kPa pressure). The laterals were spaced at 67.5 cm and each of them supplied water for one row of maize crop. The system was fitted with hydro-cyclone filter and screen filter (100-micron mesh size) for filtration of groundwater. Venturi injectors were used for fertigation and the required suction was developed by using upstream and downstream pressure.Crop establishment and treatments: The permanent beds (PB) were prepared using a bed planter and were kept undisturbed year after year with only a reshaping (once in a year). The mid-furrow to mid-furrow width of all PB plots was 67.5 cm along with 37 cm wide flat tops, and depth of furrow was 15 cm. In CT plots, initially soil was inverted by one deep tillage followed by 2-ploughings with cultivator and thus the final fresh beds were prepared with the help of bed maker. After harvesting of maize and wheat lach year, 50% and 25% of residues of both crops, respectively were kept on the soil surface in all the CAbased PB plots (PBWR), while in case of CT and without residue retained PB (PBWOR) plots residues of both crops were removed. Maize hybrid (P3396) was sown using maize plants with a seed rate of 20 kg/ha on 20 th June, 2019 and was harvested on 13 th October, 2019. The experiment was framed in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 12-treatments and replicated thrice.In total 12 treatments were selected in this experiment. CA+ treatments were residue retained (WR) permanent bed (PB) with sub-surface drip fertigation (PB-SSD): PBWR-SSD-N0, PBWR-SSD-N120Eq, PBWR-SSD-N120Df, PBWR-SSD-N150 Eq and PBWR-SSD-N150 Df. CA alone treatment included PB furrow irrigation with 120 kg N/ha (PBWR-Furrow-N120); CT treatment (without residue WoR) involved; furrow irrigation with 120 kg N/ha (CTWOR-Furrow-N120) and other treatments were residue removed (WOR) PB: PBWOR-without N (N0), with 120 and 150 kg N/ha applied in four equal (Eq) splits and differential (Df) splits (25% extra N at knee high stage). A common dose of 60 kg/ha P 2 O 5 + 30 kg/ha K 2 O was applied to all plots as basal. Except N0 (no nitrogen) treatments, all other treatments received 23.5 kg N fertilizer along with the common basal dose of P and K. Rest 96.5 kg and 126.5 kg N was allotted for SSD-N120 Eq (both PBWOR and PBWR) and SSD-N150 Eq (both PBWOR and PBWR) plots, respectively and was fertigated in four equal splits at 15 days interval starting from 21 days after sowing (DAS). Whereas, in PBWOR-SSD-N120 Df, PBWR-SSD-N120 Df and PBWOR-N150 Df, PBWR-N150 Df plots 25% extra N i.e. 30.2 kg and 39.5 kg N, respectively were applied at knee high stage (~21 DAS). The rest amount of N was applied into 3-equal (Eq) splits at 15 days interval. In furrow irrigated plots (CTWOR-furrow-N120, PBWRfurrow-N120) the remaining N (96.5 kg) was top dressed in two equal splits at knee-high stage (~21 DAS) and at pre tasselling stage (~45 DAS).Yield attributes and yield: Yield attributes, yields and harvest index of maize were measured as per the standard procedure described by Parihar et al. (2018) and Nayak et al. (2019).Plant nitrogen analysis and N-use efficiency: N content in stover and grain was determined by CHNS analyser. The N uptake in grain and stover were computed by multiplying N content with maize yields.Nitrogen use-efficiency was calculated as; Agronomic N use-efficiency (ANUE) (kg grain yield increase/kg N applied) = (Grain yield (kg) in fertilized plot−Grain yield (kg) in control plot)/kg of N applied.Statistical analysis: Analysis of variance was performed using the GLM procedures of the statistical analysis system (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) for Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) (Gomez and Gomez 1984). The differences between treatment means were performed by least significant difference (LSD) test at P<0.05.Yield attributes and biological yield: Highest number of cobs/ha was observed in PBWR-SSD-N150 Df (72,800) treatment followed by PBWR-SSD-N150Eq (72,460). On an average the CA-based SSDF N120 PB treatments (CA+) had 1829 and 2029 nos. of more cobs per hectare than the CA alone furrow irrigated N120 PB (PBWR-Furrow-N120) and conventional treatment (CTWOR-Furrow-N120), respectively (Table 1). Similarly, there were 1412 more cobs recorded in SSD-N150 Eq treatments (average of both residue retained and residue removed plots) over the SSD-N120 Eq plots. The number of cobs were higher by 1429 in SSD-N150 Df treatment compared to SSD-N120 Df treatment plots. Cob length was also significantly (P<0.05) affected by contrasting tillage, residue and N management methods (Table 1). Highest cob length (22.61 cm) was recorded in PBWR-SSD-N150 Df plots which were statistically at par with other SSDF treatment except PBWOR-SSD-N120 Eq. Application of 120 kg N/ha through SSDF in residue retained PB plots (CA+) 144 PATRA ET AL.(PBWR-SSD-N120 Eq and PBWR-SSD-N120 Df) did not increase cob length significantly over CA alone PBWR-Furrow-N120 treatment. However, PBWR-SSD-N150 Df treatment (CA+) resulted 2.47 cm and 3.13 cm increase in cob length over PBWR-Furrow-N120 (CA alone) and CTWOR-Furrow-N120 (conventional) plots, respectively. Treatment PBWR-SSD-N150 of and PBWR-SSD-N150 Eq had highest number of granis per row (36). Contrasting tillage practices, N and irrigation management methods also significantly (P<0.05) affected the number of grains per cob. Highest number of grains per cob (605) was recorded in PBWR-SSD-N150 Df treatment, although it was at par with other SSDF treatments. The effect of 120 kg N/ha application through SSDF and surface broadcasting (furrow irrigated plots) were also at par with respect to number of grains per cob. On an average the CA-based sub-surface drip fertigated N120 PB plots (CA+) had 33 and 48 more grains per cob than the CA alone and conventional treatment, respectively (Table 1).The yield attributing characters of maize, i.e., cob length, girth (P<0.05) and number of grains per row (P<0.05) were significantly correlated with maize grain yield (Fig 1A). The degree of correlation between grains per cob and grain yield was more prominent in differential N application (Df) (25% extra during knee high stage) treatments than the equal split treatments (Fig 1B). Yield attributing characters of maize i.e. cob length and grains per cob were more strongly correlated with grain yield of SSDF-N150 plots than SSDF-120 plots (data not presented). All SSDF treatments had significantly higher biological yield as compared to furrow irrigated (CTWOR-Furrow-N120 and PBWR-Furrow-N120) treatments (Table 1). Although, PBWR-SSD-N150 Df treatment plots resulted highest biological yield (23.45 t/ha), the value was statistically at par with PBWOR-SSD-N150 Df (21.90 t/ha), PBWR-SSD-N150 Eq (22.5 t/ha). The significant biological yield difference between CA+ based PBWR-SSD-N120 (both Eq and Df) plots and PBWR-Furrow-N120 (CA alone) was mainly due to adoption of SSDF technology over furrow irrigated and surface broadcasted of N fertilizer. In this experiment we have estimated a decrease in biological yield of CT plots by about 16% over PBWOR-SSD-N120 (average of both Eq and Df treatments) (Table 1). The magnitude of yield gap could be higher if the comparison was drawn among CTWOR-Furrow-N120 and other SSDF treatments. Result of the study showed that there was a positive effect of residue retention and differential N application (through SSDF) on biological yield of maize (Table 1) which may in turn increased N availability and thereby biological yield. Similar results were also observed by Jat et al. (2018) and Parihar et al. (2018).Frequent irrigation and adequate N application through SSDF may have increased number of filled grains per cob, cob length and biomass accumulation which can be again correlated to higher biological yield in SSDF plots as compared to furrow irrigated CA and CT plots. These findings were similar with the result of O'Neill et al. (2008) and Bai et al. (2009). Martinez-Hernandez et al. (1991) also reported greater ear diameter, ear dry matter production, plant height and total dry matter production of maize under SSDF. Higher number of cobs/ha in SSDF plots also indicated that synchronous water and N management is crucial in order to reduce inter-plant competition (Wu et al. 2019). Precision water and nutrient management (application of N @120 and 150 kg/ha) through subsurface drip irrigation technology may have resulted in accumulation of more photosynthates in SSDF plots than furrow irrigated plots.Nitrogen content, uptake pattern, nitrogen use-efficiency (NUE): In present study among the imposed treatments the highest total N uptake was recorded from PBWR-SSD-N150 Eq (150.26 kg/ha) treatment which was statistically at par with other N150 plots (Table 2). Total N uptake in CTWOR-Furrow-N120 and CA-based PBWR-Furrow-N120 treatments were significantly lower than all the SSDF treatments (both CA+ and non-CA+). CA+ based PBWR-SSD-N120 (average of both Df and Eq) plot registered 23 and 24% higher total N uptake than furrow irrigated CA alone and conventional treatments, respectively. On average N uptake was increased by 21.3 kg/ha with application of additional 30 kg N (in N150 plots) over SSDF N120 treatments. The N harvest index ranged from 67.62% (PBWOR-SSD-N0) to 76.20% (PBWR-SSD-N120 Df) (Table 2). NHI of all the N fertilized (both SSDF and surface broadcasted) treatments were statistically similar. Furthermore, the PBWOR-SSD-N150 Df and PBWR-SSD-N150 Eq treatments also remained statistically at par with N0 plots in terms of NHI. The mineral N availability was higher when N was directly applied to the root zone through SSDF. Wu et al. (2019) also observed higher amount of available NO 3 -N for plants in the root zone when supplied through fertigation to conventional method. The higher N uptake under SSDF as compared to CAalone (PBWR-Furrow-N120) and CT plots (CTWOR-Furrow-N120) may be justified with the above facts. Grain N content was statistically similar in all treatments whereas stover N content differed. Higher straw N (%) content was recorded under no nitrogen condition (N0). Under no nitrogen condition initiation of physiological maturity was not uniform and there was considerable overlap between vegetative and reproductive phases in existing population.Plants in these plots may have accumulated soil inherent N in excess, but at the same time incapable to remobilize considerable amount of N into grains as the sink development was poor (Uribelarrea et al. 2007). Comparatively lower stover N% was recorded in residue retained plots than its counterpart (residue removal). More vegetative N remobilization into grain under residue retained condition may be a reason behind low stover N content in residue retained plots. Ultimate N content in grain is a combined effect of both remobilized pre-anthesis N and N absorbed during grain filling process. Highest ANUE (49.4 kg/kg N) was recorded under PBWR-SSD-N120 Df which remained statistically at par with other SSDF treatments except PBWOR-SSD-N150 Eq (Table 2).Among the N fertilized treatments (both SSDF and surface broadcasted) comparatively lower ANUE was recorded under furrow irrigated CT (36.7 kg/kg N) and CA alone (PBWR-Furrow-N120) (36.4 kg/kg N) plots. The average ANUE of CA+ N120 treatments (PBWR-SSD-N120 Eq and PBWR-SSD-N120 Df) were11.6 and 11.2% higher than furrow irrigated CT and CA alone treatments, respectively. With reduction in losses of applied N due to direct sub-surface application (spoon feeding) of N fertilizer, the ANUE found to be increased in all SSDF asaffected by contrasting tillage, residue, N and irrigation management practices (Supporting Information).plots. ANUE was higher under sub-surface drip irrigated condition due to higher yield per kg of applied N (Wu et al. 2019). Lamm et al. (2004) in silt loam soils of western Kansas registered 53 kg/kg ANUE in maize when the crop was supplied with 180 kg N/ha using SSDF. Recently, under a CA-based system study in north-west India, Jat et al (2019) reported that CA+ practice adopted in MW-mungbean system recorded a partial factor productivity (PFP) value of 53.4 (kg maize grain/kg N applied) with application of 140 kg N/ha through SSDF. Increase in N dose by 30 kg over 120 kg increased the crop yield but comparatively at a lower rate which led to slight reduction of ANUEs in SSD-N150.In conclusion the results of our study suggest adoption of SSDF as a means of increasing crop productivity, saving of precious irrigation water, increasing NUE in CA-based maize grown in MW sequence. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3142142319.json b/main/part_2/3142142319.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49a6a8f9cd772fe699965b96cc84c47110297647 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3142142319.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"05cd2073ef7ca5b770b43831d5e5740c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e78c8429-5d79-4e61-bbbc-d36afeb4335a/retrieve","id":"1583616750"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3038a5b4-d4ea-4795-a52a-718338e4b4de","content":"production but at the same time disclaim any liability, loss or risk, personal or otherwise, which is incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this book.Although suggestions and recommendations given are accurate in most cases, because of the diversity in the region they are sometimes general in nature and may not meet the specific circumstances of individual situations. Moreover, mention, visual representation or inferred reference of a product, service, manufacturer or organisation in this publication does not imply endorsement by the authors. Exclusion does not imply a negative evaluation. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks, or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.List of Tables Table 3.1: Performance of rabbits (mean values) fed three different forages with a commercial rabbit concentrate /59 With each passing day, the need to produce healthy and nutritious food in a sustainable manner increases. While scientists and food producers actively seek out alternative ways to produce food to meet this demand, other challenging events to food production now require a redoubling of efforts. The ever increasing impacts of climate change in the Caribbean which have been predicted to be manifested in more frequent extreme events such as stronger hurricanes, longer droughts, severe floods, and more virulent pests and diseases, now demand that sustainable food production should rise to the top of the region's agenda for immediate action.The pressing need for food following extreme events is likely to force producers to engage in non-sustainable practices such as: injudicious use of inorganic chemicals, misuse of scarce water resources, practise extreme land tillage practices, abandon rest periods, and clear virgin forests, all in an effort to produce food rapidly in a period of high demand. All of these, and other likely non-sustainable practices which may be adopted because of urgency to meet the demand for food in a dire situation, could roll back the gains the region has made in the last few years towards implementing more sustainable food production practices.The role of education in the effort to produce safe and nutritious food in a sustainable manner is of paramount importance, and therefore cannot be overstated. Research will have little impact if food producers are not adequately educated and well-equipped to make deliberate and determined efforts to adopt more sustainable approaches to food production over the entire value chain.To support the region's effort to develop a sustainable food production system, the first volume titled Sustainable Food Production Practices in the Caribbean was published in 2012. This second volume is meant to provide a seamless transition from Volume 1. It provides technical information, in an easy reading style on a variety of practices, which if adopted, have the potential to transform present unsustainable approaches to food Isaac Bekele, PhD Dean, Faculty of Food and Agriculture The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and TobagoSustainable Food Production Practices in the Caribbean -Volume 2 production to those which can meet the region's food needs while reducing stresses and strains on the environment. The quality and appropriateness of the information in this volume, as well as the de-emphasis on technical jargon, makes this book essential reading for students in agriculture at all levels and in particular, the CSEC and CAPE levels and for those pursuing the various Diplomas in Agriculture around the region. While it can be also used as a reference book by students at the higher level, some eager farmers could make use of its offerings. Although the two volumes are useful as essential resource materials for the region's extension practitioners, their content is relevant and appropriate to tropical agriculture generally.The region has taken too long to embark on the road to sustainable food production, and the consequences are ever present, as can be seen in the denuded hillsides in some countries, an over-abundance of weeds, pests and diseases, unusable soils, and the heavy use of chemicals. The region has a long road to recovery. Sustainable production of safe and nutritious food is therefore critical to the welfare of all people in the region. This second volume is aimed at supporting the region's effort to develop sustainable food production systems by promoting the use of appropriate practices, as the region cannot always expect the problems faced internally to be solved externally. Land, water and other non-renewable resources in the region are very limited, and are now being threatened by events over which we have little control. Despite this however, all of us who live in this region can take actions to mitigate any negative impacts. To overcome these imminent challenges, the region must strengthen its efforts to work harder and smarter to achieve more sustainable food production systems, a legacy for future generations of the Caribbean.Sustainable Food Production Practices in the Caribbean -Volume 2 of food for local consumption in the Caribbean with some potential for export. While it is important to note the recent trends in large-scale production, including a long decline in plantation systems geared for the export of single crops, and more recent attempts to boost commercial farming for delivery to niche export markets, the chapter looks at recent and emerging efforts to implement non-traditional systems geared to small-scale farming. These systems are aimed at strengthening local food security and adapting traditional farming methods in the face of climate change.Chapter Eleven traces the historical evolution of the agro-forestry system, and gives a broad overview of agro-forestry from an international perspective. Agro-forestry is presented as an exciting opportunity for farmers but not as a cure-all for all our land-use problems.As with any other land-use option, agro-forestry involves trade-offs, i.e., some short-term gains may have to be given up for the sake of long-term sustainability. Throughout the chapter, references and examples are provided for countries belonging to the Caribbean Community (CARICOM).The final chapter in the book, Chapter Twelve, presents a note that introduces a method for growing Tilapia in Atlantic seawater in the island of St Kitts as a sustainable alternative to the traditional coastal fishery systems.In conclusion, it is our deep desire that this book will be a fitting complement to Volume 1 and that all who read it will be greatly enriched by the wealth of information presented by the various contributions.In the world today, there are over 500 million small producers and family farms. Eighty percent of all farm holdings in developing countries, including the Caribbean, are family owned and operated, and although they practise small scale production, grow 80 percent of the world's food that feeds billions every day. Small producers and family farms are also known to be important preservers of the world's natural resources as they conserve ecosystems and biodiversity. At the same time, they experience many barriers because of the size of their operations, systems of production, what they produce, their modus operandi, and their management practices. Further, the areas where women predominate as farm managers, partners, family labour and/or wage labourers, are continuously neglected because of gender discrimination. As a result, it is difficult for many small producers and family farms to move beyond subsistence levels. Consequently most of the world's poor are the very ones producing half of the world's food -the women and men small farmers and their families.Most farming families live in humble homes and operate low-resource farms. They are often stereotyped as uneducated, resistant to technology and modern practices, and are criticized for having a non-profit management orientation. Nevertheless, the data show that small producers and family farms are consistently producing food in sustainable ways. The United Nations (UN) reports that small producers and family farms play a major role in hunger reduction and sustainable development and has designated 2014 as the International Year of Family Farming. They also suggest thatThe Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food Security Theresa Ann Rajack-Talley agricultural production worldwide should be transformed from predominantly large-scale and intensive farming systems to small-scale sustainable models, in order to alleviate poverty and eradicate hunger (UN 2011). In the Caribbean, this means a tangible shift from the favoured male-dominated, 'cash' crop export-oriented focus to domestic food production and greater emphasis on the role of women in agriculture. This will require a repositioning of the farm family system from the periphery to the centre of the region's agricultural sector. A redirection of Caribbean agriculture is extremely important at this time for two main reasons. First the food import bill has been rapidly climbing and was estimated at US$3-6 billion for the region for the 2012-2013 period. With the exception of Belize and Guyana, most of the Caribbean countries are net importers of food, averaging 60 percent in some cases and as high as 80 percent in others. Such high levels of food importation compete with local food production and gives rise to uncertainties in the domestic agricultural sector and food prices. Further, a heavy dependency on importation to satisfy food demands presents a threat to the region's food security and the dietary patterns and nutrition of Caribbean people. The importation of foods is usually accompanied by a fast food culture and the use of highly processed foods that elevate levels of salt, fats and sugars, and often results in an increase in obesity, hypertension, and other health related conditions. Secondly, the removal of protective markets for some of the region's most important agricultural exports such as sugar and bananas has resulted in a decline in the sales and prices of these products on the open market. Consequently, farm families who depended on the sales from export crops experienced serious losses in income. To a large extent, prior farm owners had no other alternative but to become wage earners and seek non-agricultural sources of income, losing the freedom and autonomy that family farms offered. Additionally, hundreds of farm labourers from rural villages across the Caribbean are now unemployed.These developments in the Caribbean have fronted an urgent call to diversify the agricultural sector and focus on food security and sustainable development. At the core of this plan lies the network of small producers and family farms that are scattered throughout the landscape of the region. Since women play major roles as small producers in local food production and marketing, such a reorientation also necessitates addressing gender issues in agriculture (FAO 2011). In other words, supporting small farming systems and gender equality are both necessary for sustainable agricultural development that meets the food and healthy dietary needs of people, maintains and generates employment, and supports the social, cultural, and economic development of rural communities and society at large.The following analyses and discussions attempt to explain further the role of small producers and family farms in sustainable agricultural production, food security, and economic growth for the Caribbean. In the process, the negative images of the 'peasant'| 3The Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food Security farmer are demystified and the role of women in domestic food production, processing and marketing, inevitably becomes central to the discussions. They begin with a brief account of the history of small producers and family farms and their role in agricultural diversification.The continued importance of the sector and small farm production systems are discussed along with a profile of the small producer and the family farm. Core to the discourse is the relationship between the plantation system and the family farming system, the export market and the domestic food sector. Within the discourse, women's roles are highlighted, their potential explored, and the challenges they face identified. At the end of the chapter, recommendations are made that tie together small producers, family farms, gender equality, and sustainable food production in the Caribbean. However before we discuss the role of small producers, family farms, and women in food security and sustainable development, it is important to understand what is food security and what do we mean by sustainable development. The World Food Summit of 1996 defined food security as having three main pillars:• Food availability: sufficient quantities on a consistent basis;• Food access: having sufficient resources to obtain appropriate foods for nutritious diets; and• Food use: appropriate use based on knowledge of basic nutrition along with adequate water and sanitation.On the other hand, according to the Atangana (2012), the President of the Pan-African Farmers' Association, for agricultural development to be sustainable the following basic principles should be adhered to:• The system should be able to feed the family and ensure an income;• The system must work in harmony with the environment and therefore be based on agro-ecological production;• The sector should also be able to sustain employment; and• Sustainable agricultural development should incorporate agricultural diversification as an alternative to industrial type mono-cropping systems Achieving sustainable food production, therefore, ensures food security and having food security means that the basic right of people to the food they need is met. Within these two understandings, the small producer and the family farm appear to be good models on which sustainable food production can be built. Moreover, both the small producer and the family farm have proven to be persistent and strong features of the rural landscape of many Caribbean countries. On these farms women are the main growers of local foods, and in the home they assume responsibility for planning and preparing the meals/diets of families, and society at large. It stands to reason therefore, that regional food security can be increased by changing the focus of agricultural production to support the small producer and the family farm, as well as enhancing the wide ranging role of women. But who are small farmers and how can family farms contribute to sustainable development?Farmers who produce on a small scale are often part of a family farm operation and are sometimes referred to as peasants, small farmers or small cultivators. In the Caribbean, the history of their evolution is tied to the post-emancipation period of plantation production under colonialism. However, peasant-type activities were observed long before emancipation when under slavery (pre-1938 period) enslaved women and men grew most of their own food and were allowed to sell the excess in open-air markets. The small producer and family farming systems as we know them today were started after emancipation and located either on the peripheries of the plantations or on abandoned estates. Some were established in the mountainous interiors -wherever ex-slaves could find land. The now freed peasant workers had no choice but to continue to work on the plantations for cash, however, their orientations were to reject the plantation system of mass production, monoculture agriculture, and a dependence on foreign control.The historical evolution of small producers and family farms Marshall (1983) identified three stages of growth of the small farming system or the peasantry as he called it. The period of establishment (1838-1850/60), during which there was a huge desire by emancipated slaves to acquire land and use the skill and knowledge they gained from working on the plantations to become independent cultivators. Land acquisition, however, varied from one Caribbean country to another. In the smaller territories with well-established sugar plantations, such as Barbados, St Kitts and Antigua, there were fewer opportunities to access and purchase land. On the other hand, in Jamaica, Trinidad, British Guiana, and the Windward Islands, there were greater opportunities for land acquisition and the establishment of small peasant farms.Secondly, there was the stage of consolidation which extended to the 1900s. During this period, the monies earned from selling mainly ground provisions were used by the plantation labourers to purchase their own small farm holdings and become independent cultivators. Many small villages were established at this time and the small-scale farmers expanded their operations to include the production of crops for the export markets. As the small | 7The Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food Security• Farm lands are either owned, or rented/leased, shared with other family members, or illegally occupied (squatters) on government or absentee landlord-owned estates.It is also common to find farmers utilizing a combination of these different tenure arrangements;• Farm size can vary, but small operations range from 0.2-2.0 ha. There is also a group of landless farmers;• Many farmers have separate plots of land that are dispersed, of different sizes and tenure arrangements; and not all the land is utilized at the same time;• Mixed farming is practiced, which incorporates a combination of crop production, livestock husbandry, forestry, artisanal fishery and small scale aquaculture;• Some farmers practice agricultural diversification, producing food both for the home and the local markets, as well as for the export market;• Farmers devote a major part of their time to cultivation using mainly their own labour and that of family members, with little paid help from non-family labourers. The primary farmer both manages the farm and is part of the farm labour;The livelihoods of family members are dependent on the farm, but many rural households cannot depend entirely on agricultural production and combine income from the farm with cash earned from off-farm agricultural and non-agricultural activities.Information on the socio-economic description of the small farmer is not readily available but the common depiction is of an aged, predominantly male population. This may be the case in many countries such as Jamaica for example, where the average male farmer is 50-60 years old. However, the census of agriculture data for many Caribbean countries record the small farmer as male, ranging in age from 41 to 54 years, while women farmers are recorded as comprising 30 percent of the farming population. In a few countries young people are becoming involved in farming, however in general, youth under the age of 25 years show little interest and women under 35 are absent from the statistics as farm holders. Approximately, 50 percent of small farmers have some level of primary level education, 20 percent have secondary school certification, and a few have post-secondary or tertiary education (FAO 2012). These demographics are important when working with the small farmer as they help to determine the best form of communication, how to exchange information and technology, and overall, how to work with the farming families.Most farmers continue to access their information from informal sources, family members, other farmers, and based on their own experiences. They also talk with agricultural shop owners and extension officers. Radio and to a lesser extent television programmes focused on aspects of farming, are also of interest to them. More recently, farmers turn to their children to access the internet for information and research. Interestingly, while it is common to hear farmers say that they do not want their children to follow in their footsteps and encourage and invest in their children's education, they do engage their children in farming as part of a family business. However, the family farming businesses of these small Caribbean farmers do not conform to your stereotypical business model. As a result, it is often missed by professionals who argue that farmers need to change their approach and become more businesslike -rather than see the family farm model as one of many different business models that can lead to sustainable development.More often than not, farming offers an opportunity when all other doors are closed either because of lack of qualifications, job opportunities, or resources. As a whole farmers comprise a mixed group of individuals. Some are innovators, while others are less willing to change their traditional methods of farming. Most admit that they enjoy farming, have a profound love and respect of the land, and take pride in having a keen sense of the importance of being able to produce food for family and country.Whether small farmers and farming families are innovators or traditionalist is best understood by examining the many reasons why they do not readily change their agricultural practices. The most common factors include inadequate information and the lack of the requisite technical and financial resources. However, even when these are provided some farmers are still hesitant to adapt and improvise because they are not yet convinced that the risks associated with these 'unproven' ideas are worth taking chances. Caribbean small farmers do have what has been described as an aversion to risk under uncertainty (Beckford 2002). Others also suggest that Caribbean small farmers exhibit the characteristics of risk appraisers and/or adoption appraisers (Beckford and Campbell 2013). There is however, one valid explanation for such behaviour that is usually missed by scientists and policy makers, that is, farmers exercise human agency in their decision-making, especially when the survival of their families is at risk.In most small farming households, families are highly dependent on food and income derived from agricultural practices that have sustained them for years, albeit at meagre or adequate levels. When new ideas are presented, it is imperative that farmers and their families appraise the risk of the situation and assess the possibilities of losing everything, along with the potential hunger and poverty that may result. In other cases, the farmer and his/her family may also assess the ability of the household to avert any negative outcome and whether or not they can recover without going hungry and poor, if they fully adopt new ideas. It is because of these types of assessments that small producers and family farms have traditionally practised mixed farming and crop diversification. If one product fails due to a disease, catastrophe in the market, or because of flooding and other natural disasters, they can rely on the other farm enterprise to feed and/or earn an income to take care of their families.Farmers are very sensitive to the outcomes if their farming practices fail. Beckford and Campbell (2013, 50) rightly link the small farmer's 'safety first mantra' to years of experience of not having government and/or other institutional support and safety nets. Small cultivators are members of households and villages and are responsible for making rational decisions in the best interest of all. Their methods of assessment before making decisions are seldom noted and widely misinterpreted as an inherent unwillingness to adapt. Farmers are not necessarily 'diametrically opposed to innovations' but they must first be convinced based on their own assessment that the recommended farming practices are safe, and the methods and technologies are both useful as well as affordable to the household budget (not just the farm), before they adopt (Beckford and Campbell 2013, 51).As it relates to farming families on small farms, Le Franc (2006) has noted that there are other life threatening priorities other than economics. The hesitancy of farmers to change their practices should not be perceived simply as a cultural phenomenon. They are known to make rationale choices as human beings and if they do not adopt what is perceived as an economically sound idea, it is often because they have not been convinced that it can work, and/or that there is a safety net to protect his/her family if it does not. If we give farmers human agency then the typecast of the unresponsive farmer and laggard will be rejected and the frustrations that researchers, scientists and policymakers experience when working with small producers and farming families, could possibly be resolved. Equally important, we will be able to see clearly, why and how, small operations and family farming systems have been able to withstand the wrath of natural disasters and changing market demands, as well as positively view how many of their farming practices relate to food security and sustainable development.Although the tourism, mining and energy sectors are seen as the mainstays of Caribbean economies, agricultural production has always been linked to the region's economic development, export trade, and foreign exchange earnings. Further, the livelihood of manyThe Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food SecurityAlthough the agricultural sector as a whole may not be the dominant contributor to the GDP of some countries in the region, it does play a significant social role in providing steady employment, food provisioning, and as a source of income for many. The common position however, is that it is the export sector, consisting of the large plantation estates privately owned or operated by individual governments, that is of greater socio-economic importance and core to the development of Caribbean economies. This position is further supported by the idea that the plantation system of production is needed to compete on the 'open' and 'free' market with plantations in Central America such as those owned by Chiquita and Dole. Conversely, the network of small farming systems were and still are, considered obstacles to a more modernized agricultural sector and the development of Caribbean societies. But can issues of food insecurity, poverty, malnutrition and hunger be resolved through large-scale commercial production of 'cash' crops? Moreover, can the UN's call to support the family farm change the region's long history of domination and dependency on male-dominated plantation systems of production, and the importation of food?The importance of small producers and family farms to sustainable development By 2050, the world population is expected to increase to nine billion people, with an accompanying demand for at least 60 percent more food. The FAO Assistant Director General, Latin America and Caribbean, is convinced that small scale farming can significantly contribute to meet this growing food demand (FAO 2012). This projection is based on data for Latin America and the Caribbean which showed that small producers mainly on family farms accounted for more than 80 percent of agricultural production, 27 percent to 67 percent of total food production; and occupied between 12 percent and 67 percent of the agricultural land area. Equally important, approximately 57 percent to 77 percent of all agricultural employment in the region was linked to small-scale agriculture production on these farms (FAO 2012). These statistics are illustrative of how small scale farming on primarily family farm make economically and socially significant impacts to the region's development.Economically they produce food items for their families, neighbours, and other villagers; for the small towns and larger cities; and for the local roadside vendors and domestic markets. Some family farms also produce crops for the export markets subsidising the sales from the large commercial estates. They also supply cross-border markets liaising with intermediaries, such as hucksters and higglers, in the food supply chain across the Caribbean seas. These small family-owned and operated farms are consistent suppliers of food because their livelihoods depend on it…it is what they do. Family farming is a way of life and a way to live. They use all the resources available to them to feed their households and earn an income from the farm that can sustain a decent family life. Profits attained are shared between family and household needs. Extra earnings are re-invested in the farm to improve production capacity. In other words, the farm family is the main investor in the farm, even though the farm is not often referred to as a family business.Since family members are the main source of labour, the farm is also a place of employment. It not only sustains numerous rural household members, but creates jobs and is essentially a consistent source of inter-generational income. Family farms therefore, not only provide the farming families with part (or all) of its food, but also guaranteed employment. Periodically they hire rural labourers on the farm and create link jobs in transportation, packaging, processing and marketing of their produce. Within this context, the well-established network of small producers and family farms generate social safety nets through direct and indirect employment of rural or non-urban populations, and the provisioning of food.Caribbean economies also benefit greatly from agro-industry businesses (food, beverages, tobacco, spices, etc.) that are important to their GDP earnings. In Trinidad and Tobago for example, the 2004 data show that 3.1 percent of the country's GDP was derived from the agro-industry sector and another 45.2 percent from manufacturing. Ironically, this country is a net importer of food, as well as a net exporter of beverages, tobacco and other food exports. While currently small producers are not the major suppliers for many agroindustries they do have the potential, including the family labour, to transform certain products into by-products that add value to primary agricultural products. The region also has a long history of cottage industries in which women pre-dominate. The concept and practice of agro-processing is therefore very much alive in Caribbean culture and in the homes of farming families. Therefore investment in research, training, small business, credit, and sector linkages with agro-processing, are all worthwhile endeavours that can contribute to food security and sustainable development.But development cannot be sustainable if the environment is not first protected. The lay person travelling through the undulating terrain of many Caribbean countries sees the smoke on the mountainside and becomes aware of the 'slash and burn' practices of some farmers. This image oftentimes is transferred to all small farmers. However, it is more common to find that traditional farming families are the protectors of the environment and biodiversity. According to FAO (2012), family farming systems are more inclined to use native varieties, conserve and practise soil improvement, and are less dependent on inorganic ameliorates (fertilizers, pesticides, etc.) and other hurtful chemicals. Furthermore, small producers and family farms have always practiced crop diversification, mixed farming and forestry -practices that mitigate environmental degradation.The Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food SecurityNevertheless, little credence is given to small producers and farming families who have been the guardians of the environment, indigenous knowledge, and good agricultural practices. By passing farming knowledge and traditions across generations, small producers and farming families have withstood the physical challenges usually associated with agriculture. Additionally, because their scale of operations is usually small, it is easier for them to respond to environmental impacts or changing market demands. The lack of resources and support means that their systems of farming may not always move production to high profit-making levels, but they do continue to provide food for families, and practice methods that are safe and sustainable. Interestingly, agricultural diversification is now being highly recommended for the region and the same methods of farming that small farmers have historically practiced are being touted as the 'new' approach for sustainable development.Lastly, small producers and family farms contribute to sustainable development because they stabilize the scattering of villages and small towns located throughout the countryside. Farmers either live on their farms or in nearby villages or towns. Either way, the farming environs are not simply a place of production but a home to many farming families. The network of small producers and family farms in any one location stimulates economic activities, create opportunities for small businesses, and sometimes successfully converts villages into small towns. They balance rural and urban livelihoods, halt rural-urban drifts, and slow down outward migration from Caribbean countries. Conversely, when settlements are stable they become valuable conduits for preserving and enhancing indigenous knowledge, traditions, and customs of local communities. It is therefore imperative that small producers and family farms continue to make a livelihood and economically grow so that there is continuity and preservation of the culture of many rural communities and small towns. This contribution by small producers and family farms is often not valued or perceived as important to sustainable development (box 1.1).In general, while small-scale operations and the family farming system present many advantages for food production, food security and sustainable development, the maledominated plantation production systems that rule the region are currently unsustainable. The revitalization of the small producer and the family farm, as well as the enhancement of women's role in agriculture, will ensure the production of local vegetables, fruits and root crops, as well as the rearing of healthy animals. Small family farms will stabilize the production of staples for the region such as rice, yams and bananas, and provide less processed food products. Moreover, a highly productive peasant sector and family farming system will lead to expanded and/or steady employment, gender equity, healthier families, stronger communities and an overall strengthening of Caribbean economies. Core to these activities is the role of women in Caribbean agriculture.Small producers and/or family farms contribute to sustainable development because they:• Produce food for families, communities, and the local, regional and export markets; • Are a constant source of employment for families, villagers, and income earners in linked activities; • Provide a safety net to generations of families including members of their communities; • Protect the natural environment and biodiversity;• Are more likely to use organic products and native species in their methods of farming; • Practice agricultural diversification and mixed-method farming and can better respond to environmental and market changes; • Are a source of indigenous knowledge and practices that are passed on over generations; • Preserve traditions and local cultures;• Own their labour, farming business, and are free to make their own decisions; • Stabilize rural communities and stimulate economic activities in villages and small towns.The overall proportion of the economically active population (EAP) working in agriculture declined during the 1990s, but the percentage of economically active women working in agriculture at the global level remained at nearly 50 percent through to the twenty-first century. While this percentage of women in agriculture is expected to decrease overall, the percentage of economically active women working in the sector in less developed countries (LDCs) is projected to remain above 70 percent (FAO 2006). The relatively high participation of women in agricultural work is due in part, to the greater involvement of rural male populations in off-farm employment, and/or the increase in male migration to urban areas in search of work. As a result, more women assume responsibility for the family farm because they must provide food and income for their families to survive, along with or in absence of, their male partners.In the Caribbean, women are involved at all levels in the agricultural sector, including small scale production as individual farmers, on family farms, as farm labour on other farms and plantation estates, and in the marketing and processing of fresh foods. The number of women in agriculture varies from one Caribbean country to another as do the populations that are engaged in agriculture. However, in all cases, the contribution of women is highly underestimated in agricultural census data, which are confined to transactions in commercial cash crop production for the formal market sector. Information on the production and marketing of agricultural produce for local use where women are mainly found working, are left out of the agriculture data bases. Women also dominate the regional export food trade buying fruits, vegetables, and root crops directly at farm gate and exporting to neighbouring islands where they are sold in wholesale markets. For example, female hucksters and higglers from Grenada and St Vincent transact business in Trinidad and Tobago and Barbados, similar to other hucksters among the Eastern Caribbean countries. While there is some documentation of the regional trade, the participation of women hucksters is also not accurately represented in the agriculture labour force statistics.As a result, women in Caribbean agriculture are almost invisible in the statistics though highly visible as small farmers, on family farms, in local and regional markets, in agroprocessing plants, and in gender specific jobs on large commercial farms. When official statistics underestimate women's participation in the agriculture sector, their contributions to domestic food supplies, households' diets and incomes, as well as the national wealth of a country through agricultural work, are also undervalued. This creates a serious shortcoming in the proper planning for food production, food security and sustainable development.Caribbean women's economic and social contributions to the agricultural sectors is not new but can be traced to their historical beginnings. Under colonization and the peak of the slave trade in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the plantation economies of Caribbean territories were well propelled by imported slave labour of both women and men from West Africa. Sugar was one of the most valuable commodities on the market and slave labour was the cheapest resource for sugar production. Enslaved African women played several roles that contributed to the economic life of the sugar plantations. They provided labour in the cane fields and worked as domestics and nannies in the plantation houses. Slave labour then, was unpaid and women's and men's labour were exploited without any moral or ethical restrictions. Women and men performed the same tasks in the cane fields as there was no sexual division of field labour (Rajack 1991).What is less known about the roles of enslaved women is that outside plantation-related work, they were the primary producers and marketers of food within slave communities (Mathurin 2006;Reddock andHuggins 1988, 1997). It was more profitable for the plantation owners to have the enslaved women and men produce much of their own food. As such, even as they worked on the sugar estates, they also engaged in peasant-like activities cultivating subsistence food crops to feed themselves. Because women were perceived as 'less dangerous' than men, they were permitted to sell any extra food grown, at a common public market on Sunday mornings. The prevalence of women in the local market, and as hucksters/higglers in the municipal markets, is a continuance of the historical dominance of food markets by women throughout the Caribbean.With the ending of slavery in the mid-twentieth century, many of the enslaved African women retired from agricultural fieldwork with the hope of working in other non-plantation type jobs and/or becoming housewives and homemakers. Very soon after, the downward wage pressure and rising food prices promoted large-scale migration of male ex-slaves in search of work in other countries. To fill the void, women once again moved into agricultural production on the plantations, as well as continued growing food to feed their families (Momsen 1991(Momsen , 1993;;Mintz 1974Mintz , 1984)). On the plantations, the freed African women were for the first time employed for wages but under a stringent gender division of labour that paid them lower wages than men. By that time, a gender stratification of labour with differential pay for women and men had emerged under the system of indentured labour (Rajack 1991;Reddock andHuggins 1988, 1997). The wages earned by women and men were so low, that they had to supplement their household incomes by growing some of their own foods and selling the extra produce in local markets, as they had done prior to emancipation. The women drew on their business experiences from selling in the open public Sunday markets and established themselves as the primary marketers in the internal food market systems of the region.In Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, and to a lesser extent in other Caribbean countries, the abolition of slave labour led to the demand for indentured labour from India that was also under British colonization. Within the indenture labour regime, women often carried out the same tasks as men -planting, weeding, hauling of trash, applying fertilizers, cutting, bundling and loading of the sugar canes. The plantation owners however, paid women wages well below those of the men and justified the wage differential by categorizing women in the same group as 'weakly' men and boys. In the early twentieth century, the average weekly wage was one dollar for men while women were paid wages that were one half to two-thirds that of men. The gender stratification of labour with wage differentials was carried over into the post-colonial period and adopted by the government-owned sugar companies of the Caribbean (Brereton 1983;Rajack 1991;Reddock andHuggins 1988, 1997).The Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food SecurityToday, women continue to work as wage earners primarily in labour-intensive jobs on the large estates cultivating sugar cane, banana, cocoa, coffee, coconut, citrus and other plantation crops. They are mainly hired on a seasonal basis for planting, weeding, and harvesting of certain crops and in post-harvest and processing of other produce for sale. Their low wages are normally justified by the job category of their work, similar to the application of labour stratification of the old plantation systems. Nevertheless, the wage earned is an important source of income to many rural, low-income and poor households. Women's participation in the production of 'cash' crops for the export trade contributes to the GDP that is derived from the agriculture sector. However, because of the seasonal and/or part-time nature of their jobs, their participation is not accurately counted in the statistics on the agricultural labour force, which tends to exclude non full-time employees.Similarly, women dominate in the full production, post-harvest processing, and marketing of food crops for the domestic sector. Here again, because the domestic food sector is part of the informal economy it is not as regulated as the commercial production sector and data on women's roles is absent. Nevertheless, women's most significant contribution to food production and food security lies in the roles they play on family farms. There, women consistently engage in the provisioning of food for many homes, as well as for national and regional markets. On the family farms women participate in all aspects of the productive cycle in both crop and livestock production, but there are some noticeable gender patterns in the division of labour by sex (Rajack-Talley and Talley 2000).The concepts of 'sex' and 'gender' are sometimes wrongly used as the same and can be confusing. Sex refers to the innate biological categories of male or female. Gender refers to the social roles and identities associated with what it means to be a man or a woman. Gender roles are shaped by ideological, religious, ethnic, economic and cultural factors and are key determinant of the distribution of responsibilities and resources between men and women (Moser 1989). Being socially determined, however, this distribution can be changed through conscious social action, including public policy. Every society is marked by gender differences, but these vary widely by culture and can change dramatically over time. According to Quisumbing (1996), sex is biology and gender is sociological. Sex is also fixed and gender roles change.Sustainable Food Production Practices in the Caribbean -Volume 2Livestock production by women is an important component of their mixed farming practices or as an enterprise by itself. Women are more likely to engage in small animal production (e.g., sheep, goats, poultry, etc.), while men tend to be involved in large livestock production (e.g., beef cattle and pigs). Even when women participate in large livestock production such as raising dairy and beef cattle, they primarily engage in those activities that are associated with their stereotypical roles as nurturers, homemakers and mothers in the home (Rajack-Talley and Talley 2000). For example, women are commonly found in activities that involve feeding, milking and/or taking care of young and sick animals. As a general rule, the more 'strenuous' jobs are usually done by men, such as collecting forage, building pens, hoof trimming, and machinery operation.As livestock keepers in the Caribbean, women farmers are also managers of the poultry, sheep and goat and dairy farms. Ownership of small livestock is particularly attractive to women because it can be practised close to the home and allows for the balancing of domestic chores with farming activities (Rajack and Hosein 1993). 2 Some of the animal products (e.g., eggs, milk, and meat) are used for home consumption, and part sold locally for cash income. Sales usually occur at those times of the year when demand is high (e.g., Christmas and Easter) and/or when the household needs extra cash (e.g., at the beginning of the school year, for weddings and christenings). According to one farmer, 'having a certain amount of sheep in my backyard is like having money in the bank for a rainy day' (Rajack and Hosein 1993). 3 The slow but steady outward migration of people from rural/non-urban communities has also resulted in a year round increase in the demand for basic food items including eggs, milk, poultry, and fish to feed burgeoning urban populations. The poultry and small scale dairy projects managed primarily by women are therefore important in meeting some of the food needs of the family, extra income for family social events, as well as the periodic increase in consumer demands and growing urban populations.To sustain such needs, women and men livestock farmers also need to expand their size of operations. However, it is more challenging for women farmers because of the gender differential in access to resources, including land, labour, technology, credit and extension services. These gender-based inequalities exist although female-headed livestock enterprises have been shown to be as successful as male-headed livestock production farms. Moreover, research has shown that on small family farms, shifts from subsistence to commercializedThe Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food Security levels of animal production can result in conflict over control of the livestock businesses between male and female farmers on the same farm (Rajack 1996). This is primarily because, in Caribbean societies, men are stereotyped as the main income earners and women's income are considered supplementary to household budgets. Consequently, there is no stress if women manage subsistence production, but if levels of growth results in major income earnings for the household, gender roles can become strained and the livestock enterprise a contested terrain.If the farm operations of women are subsumed by male farmers on the same farm, or by other male-headed livestock enterprises, then women are more likely to become employees rather than managers and owners of their agricultural businesses. Thus, movement towards sustainable production of the livestock industry has gender consequences unless steps are taken to ensure that women farmers are not negatively impacted by commercialized production. Further, because of where women livestock farmers direct their products, keeping women in livestock production also secures local food supplies as well as home consumption, nutrition, and single female-headed household budgets (FAO 2011).At the same time, caution must be taken not to paint women as helpless victims who are inevitably displaced as the livestock sector grows and develops. Women farmers do have agency and resist attempts to displace them or terminate their source(s) of income (Rajack 1996). Women, particularly in low-resource and/or female-headed households, understand the important role they play in providing basic food and other needs for their families, as they cannot afford to be financially marginalized in their homes. Generally, they also take great pride in feeding their community and society. Unfortunately, in livestock development projects the threat of women being displaced and their resistance to pending marginalization is too often missed by extension officers and animal scientists, as well as policymakers. So too, are the related implications to sustainable production of meat, eggs, milk, and other animal products for local food demands. As a result, a concerted effort should be made to ensure that as the sector grows, women have access to the resources they need, and that gender implications are factored into sustainable development planning and livestock practices. Some women may prefer to rear poultry and other small livestock, and find that these are more appropriate to their farm and family life. Others may want to venture or expand into larger scale operations or bigger animals and should be supported and provided with the technology, information, training and finances required. Moreover, there is a need to move away from the stereotypical beliefs that pigeonhole which livestock enterprise is more suited for women vis-à-vis men, and also the concept of the male as the livestock manager and the female as the livestock farmer and labourer.Sustainable Food Production Practices in the Caribbean -Volume 2A similar parallel is found in crop production where women produce all crop types in the domestic food sector, but there are gender-distinct crop enterprises, orientations and divisions of labour. Women participate mostly in planting, weeding, harvesting and postharvest crop activities. On the other hand, men tend to engage mostly in land preparation, application of agro-chemicals, and the use of farm equipment and machinery (Kleysen 1996 4 ; Rajack-Talley and Talley 2000). As owners of their farms, women tend to have smaller plots of land, use fewer purchased inputs and their output is usually smaller. Yet, they still produce 60 to 80 percent of food in most developing countries, that is, half of the world's food supplies (Momsen 1991;Mehra and Rojas 2008) because they concentrate on local food production for their households, communities, society and the region. The food crops are grown on small family farms on which women are either farm managers, farming partners, farm family labourers, or farm wage labourers. According to Rajack-Talley and Talley (2000), any analysis of the domestic food sector in the Caribbean is essentially an analysis of women's role in food crop production.Overall, gender patterns in the division of farm labour are linked to women's reproductive and other domestic responsibilities. Studies have shown that size and life stage of a family influence the type of farm practice, level of involvement, and time devoted to agricultural work (Barrow 1986;Rajack-Talley and Talley 2000;Overholt et al. 1985;Sen 1981). For example, women with young children elect to work close to or at home, and arrange all their farming activities so that they can accommodate their family needs. Accordingly, women without children (or adult children) have greater flexibility in terms of time, tasks, location, and the type of agricultural work they engage in. These gender distinct familial characteristics are important factors in farm and home management plans when working with farming families in food production for food security and sustainable development. Families in earlier life stages are more likely to be responsive to practices that are manageable and require women's physical presence near or on the farm. The family farming system is therefore a more appropriate fit for these women and their families. Other women may need support in broadening their scales of operations and would require more land, most likely further away from a housing area, a different type of technology, more credit, different crops, and a management and marketing system that is more commercial in orientation.See for example tables 1.10 -1.11.The Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food SecurityInterestingly, not only are there gender patterns in the division of farm labour in both livestock and crop production, but there are also gender distinct farm management practices on small farm holdings. A common trend observed is that on family farms women and men both engage in joint agricultural production and/or work and manage separate plots and enterprises. Rajack (1996) observed these various arrangements and have identified four gender distinct models of farm management. These are:Separately managed enterprises: Women and men are responsible for separate crops or livestock production. It is common for women's agricultural projects to be located near to, or at home. Decisions on each enterprise are made separately, although the couple usually discusses farming issues and help each other with the work.In this management model, women and men are involved in the same crop and/or livestock production but participate in distinct tasks -stereotypically female and male jobs. Under this arrangement, men are the major decision-makers and farm managers, while women are considered farm family labour. Discussions on farming issues are at a minimum level.This farm management model is based on the understanding that both women and men can do the same tasks -not set gender distinct work. The responsibility for all the farm enterprises is also shared. However, the male is considered the head-of-the-household and as such, is treated as the major decision-maker and farm manager. The woman farmer is not documented as being economically active in agriculture. In these situations, women may seek other forms of independent income generating enterprises such as in cottage industry.Women or men managed enterprise and tasks: In this model, the division of labour, decision making and farm management is simple. It is all done by one or the other where one partner in the couple has very little to do with farming. The person identified as the farmer (male or female) makes the agricultural decisions, performs the lion's share of work and manages the farm.Although there are no recent studies on women farm mangers in the Caribbean, what is known is that all four models exist within the region. Past studies showed that although there are wide variations from one country to another, women as major farm decisionmakers can be as high as 47 percent and as joint managers with men up to 42 percent. Overall, where women perform most of the tasks in the farm enterprise they also tend to be the major decision-makers. Gender specificity was also observed in the types of farming decisions made by women. For example, women participate more in decisions about what type of crop to grow or livestock to rear, how farm labour is to be organized, and where produce is to be sold (Kleysen 1996;Rajack-Talley and Talley 2000).Current research on gender distinctions in farm management practices and decisionmaking are urgently needed. If the trend identified in earlier studies by Kleysen (1996) and Rajack (1996) hold steady, then the high numbers of women who make farm decisions (independently or jointly) and the types of decisions that they make have significant impact on:• How information and resources (technology, labour, and finance) are allocated and managed on family farms;• What is produced and what methods of farm practices are adopted.This data can be useful in assisting the farm family to better plan for improved food production systems and farm management, both of which are important in promoting sustainable development.In addition to pre-and post-harvest activities, marketing has always been an income earning activity historically performed largely by Caribbean women (Lagro and Plotkin 1990;Mintz 1974). The custom of enslaved women selling the extra food that they were allowed to produce for themselves on the plantation in Sunday markets, rapidly expanded immediately after emancipation (Besson 2003). As independent small producers and family farms were established, the common market outlets also expanded to now include sales at the farm-gate to hucksters or higglers, agents and middle men, and also directly to customers at the local domestic or retail markets. Hence, contemporary patterns of marketing at local sites, huckstering or inter-island trading within and between the islands, sidewalk tray or 'fruit stand' selling, are not new practices for Caribbean women. Currently, women are responsible for producing and selling between 12 to 50 percent of local foods, mainly fresh fruit and vegetables, root crops, some export crops such as bananas and rice, as well as a range of other non-traditional (cut flowers, ornamentals, etc.) export crops (Mantz 2007).In the Caribbean, Mantz (2007) identified three distinct forms of market vendors in which women predominate, namely marketers, higglers and hucksters. 5 The women involved are self-employed individuals engaged in economic activities, encompassing bargaining,Men also participate in all three forms, but historically women dominate in each category of the marketing operations.The Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food Security bartering, and selling of produce. The traditional market vendors sell their goods at centralized market locations, or at regular fruit stalls on the side of the road, or in an arcade of stalls. Higglering occurs at street corners, busy intersections, or any high traffic where for example, there is road construction and a slowing down of traffic. Both these forms of operations involve simple transaction of goods and are local/domestic marketing systems.The third category of women marketers are the hucksters. In this group, women function more like entrepreneurs and are involved with inter-island trading that requires more than just buying and selling of goods but also the shipping of produce, travelling, and foreign exchange activities. The economic roles of these women have never been captured, although they serve as important forms of providing food and generating economic activities. Mantz (2007) for example found that 'huckstering' by the predominantly Dominican women accounts for the second largest foreign exchange earnings for that country.These trading patterns continue to be under the aegis of women and are sustained with little or no capital from governments or the private sector, but from women traders, small producers, and family farms. The trade requires the establishment of some level of relationship with clients and sellers, and must maintain a reputation for providing farm fresh and safe produce cultivated locally/regionally. Market selling is also a tenuous activity that requires high levels of financial competence, as well as negotiation and business skills. Pricing information is attained mainly via the radio, daily newspapers, telephone calls to current or potential customers, other marketers and agents. The level of trade and capital exchange is often not recorded and thus undervalued, alongside the entrepreneurial abilities of women.Little research has been done on women traders but what is known suggests that it is a long-standing matrilineal vocation, in which marketing skills are passed from mother to daughter and other female members in the same family. It is not unusual to find, aunts, nieces, sisters and others plying the same trade. Mantz (2007) describes this occurrence as 'women for women' and a most a vibrant and self-sustaining economic activity. Although several hundred women remain committed to the trade, their numbers are shrinking for a myriad of reasons. Labour shortages and the education of young female family members are possible push factors away from a risky and difficult female business. However, there is still an active movement among the islands of Dominica, Guadeloupe, Antigua, St Kitts, St Martin, and The Virgin Islands, St Vincent, St Lucia, Grenada, Guyana, and Trinidad and Tobago, among others. The socio-economic importance of the three categories of marketing activities at the local and regional levels has been seriously undervalued and unrecognized as a key link in the food security chain of the region. Consequently market vendors, higglers and hucksters have not been given much support although they have managed to survive. The lack of attention is due, in part to the fact that the activities occur in the domestic food systems of the informal economy, and also because they are 'women's' activities. Given the more recent downward trends, if these important food marketing systems are to be sustained, support is required to make the trade a viable one in which male (and female) marketers do more than just survive but make a decent income that can comfortably support a family. Equally important, any kind of support provided should have a gender focus that involves women themselves in areas such as training, mentorship, and skills building, as well as methods of accessing credit and the conduct of business and financial transactions. Only through this involvement and further research on the women will we be able to understand what are these gender specific ways that have worked for years. It will also provide recommendations for growth and development for women by women. In other words, efforts must not only be focused on food marketing sustainability, but also on how women can remain the leaders of the trade.There is no doubt that women play crucial roles in food security for their homes, their communities, the domestic market, in the wider society in which they live, and across the blue ocean to others where fresh fruit, vegetables, root crops and other food items are scarce. In the process they manage the natural resources and biodiversity of farmlands (FAO 2006). Despite years of proven capabilities and contributions, many women small farmers are still unable to move from subsistence to more commercial forms of agriculture so that they can grow additional food to feed the region, and at the same time earn enough to comfortably support their families. They are prevented from doing so because they experience discrimination at two levels.Firstly, as small producers focused on food crops, domestic livestock, and agriculture byproducts, women are not perceived as important as the larger cultivators who are producing for the export markets. Consequently, women as small farmers are not given the type of resources and support as the bigger farmers and the plantation systems of monocultures. More recent, the food import crisis in the region has stirred governments, along with regional and international organizations to advocate for greater support for the farm family and its role in providing food for the region. But this is a recent initiative and will take a long time for resources to reach women and men small producers and farming families before their agricultural endeavours can become more desirable and economically viable.Secondly, because of their gender, women farmers are exposed to the same gender discrimination present in mainstream society. Gender discrimination in the CaribbeanThe Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food Security is partly based on stereotypes founded on the Eurocentric notion of the role of women as housewives. The process of 'housewifisation' has led to gender specific tasks and responsibilities on the farm and a particular perception about women's capabilities. Women are rarely thought of as farm managers and producers of export cash crops and livestock products. Instead, they are viewed and treated primarily as farm labour and helpers to male farmers on peasant and family farms, and low-wage employees in packaging and processing of export products. This double subjugation of women farmers has restricted their access to agricultural resources and services such as land, credit, training, technical assistance technology and institutional support. Conversely, more resources are allocated to the export-oriented agriculture sector in which men typically own and/or are more actively employed. In particular, land distribution patterns are very uneven with respect to farm size, and this further limits women's access to credit and other farming resources.As a result, compared to men, women farmers are more likely to:• Operate smaller farms, on average one half to two-thirds the size of men farmers;• Farm on small and fragmented pieces of land either family-owned, rented or occupied without permission;• Keep fewer livestock, typically of smaller breeds, and earn less from the livestock they do own;• Have a greater overall workload that includes a heavy burden of domestic activities• Have less education and less access to agricultural information and extension services;• Use less credit and other financial services as most credit schemes favour middle to large farms in which men produce cash crops. Consequently, they tend to draw on indigenous loan schemes such as 'sub' in Dominica, the 'box' in Guyana, and 'sou sou' in Trinidad;• Purchase less inputs such as fertilizers, improved seeds and mechanical equipment;• Employed in part-time, seasonal, and low-paying jobs in which they receive low wages;• Receive less agricultural training, technology, extension services and technical assistance (less than 10 percent of women farmers are reported to receive these services).According to FAO (2010, 3):If women had the same access to productive resources as men, they could increase yields on their farms by 20-30 percent. This could raise total agricultural output in developing countries by 2.5 to four percent, which could in turn reduce the number of hungry people in the world by 12-17 percentAs the region's agricultural sector is integrated deeper into the global market it faces high trading competition for all its traditional 'cash' crops, as well as a burgeoning food import bill. This can (and already has) stifled the Caribbean's agricultural sector, both in the export markets and the local production of food in the domestic markets. As a result, there is a steady decline in GDP earnings, farm household incomes, and wage employment in the sector overall. Equally important is the social impact of this trend on the region's food security due to the increase in reliance on external supplies for food and other agriculture related by-products. If this pattern is not halted soon, then the argument made by Caribbean scholar George Beckford in the 1970s that the region will be in a state of 'persistent poverty' if it does not move away from the domination of the region's agriculture by external forces, is still relevant today (Beckford 1972).Recently a similar proposal was made by FAO that 2014 be designated as the year of the farm family, and that the Caribbean should focus more on supporting small family farms rather than the larger systems of food production. Several meetings were held in the Caribbean during 2011 to discuss the region's agricultural policies and food prices (FAO 2012), 6 at which participants more or less agreed with Beckford's theory that the agricultural policies of the past favoured the larger private agricultural enterprises and neglected the small producer and the family farm. As a result, once the vulnerable and insecure plantation crop industries were placed on the 'free and open market' many farmers, particularly the banana farmers in Dominica, St Lucia, St Vincent and others were forced out of the market and placed several families in severe economic crisis. Consequently, large numbers of people migrated from the rural areas of the islands, and for a period of time, communities were being emptied of their populations. Images of 'padlocked' homes of banana farmers who fled in search of other ways to make a living, were observed in small villages. The sugar caneMeetings were held in Santiago, Chile (June 7-8 ,2011) Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago (June 13-14, 2011), San Salvador, El Salvador (June 15-16 2011), and Mexico City, Mexico (October 17-18, 2011).| 27The Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food Security farmers and wage employees in the region's sugar industry also faced a similar situation whereby farmers and employees in the sugar industry in St Kitts, Trinidad and Tobago, and other countries had to search for other sources of income to support their families. The impact of the collapse of the guaranteed export markets that traditionally supported many Caribbean households was also felt by the many villages and small towns that depended on the economic activities generated from these households. Businesses began to suffer and the economic and social life of these communities has since paused.Poverty studies conducted by the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) in the last decade report on the impact of these shifts on poverty, particularly on the health, nutrition and education of farming families and rural/non-urban populations. 7 Farmers are no longer able to support their family needs and as such there is a greater dependency on government assistance. For women, many of whom historically played central roles in their families' household budgets as farmers, small producers, and/or wage earners in commercial agriculture enterprises, not only are the survival of their families threatened, but also their economic independence. On a larger scale, these macroeconomic constraints experienced by small producers and family farms have directly impacted the region's food production, food security and the sustainable development of every single Caribbean country.Earlier discussions showed how small producers and family farms contribute directly to: (i) the sustenance of their families, neighbours and communities; (ii) employment generation for many; (iii) the production of food for local and regional markets; and (iv) the sustainable development of the region. Small producers and family farms make it possible for millions of people across the region to have access to fresh vegetables, fruits, root crops, fish, meat and other animal products. In addition, they play an important part in the cultural customs and indigenous knowledge-base for generations of people. Collectively they have a multiplier effect in the creation of economic and social wealth in rural villages and small towns. And yet, their modus operandi has been criticized because it is not primarily focused on profit making, but in providing a valued product and/or service based on family values rather than corporate values. It is for this same reason that since colonization there has been a tendency for governments to support the male-dominated plantation systems centred on the production of 'cash' from crops and livestock, rather than on small producers and family farming systems.Conventional agricultural education has also paid little attention to small scale farming including that of family farming systems. Moreover, the information generated focuses 7.See Caribank.org more on what does not work on these farms and less on their potential. What is taught to agricultural students about best practices is not positively linked to what is actually taking place on the farm. Similarly, agriculture census collect data on size of farm and what is on the farm; gender-disaggregated data is absent and a proper understanding of the systems that farmers use that are safe, sustainable and can be enhanced, is also missing. As a result, small producers and family farms are associated with subsistence production, and as such patronized as recipients of government assistance. Thus, parents themselves encourage their sons and daughters to become educated and leave farming and at the same time, hope that the family farm will remain as a family owned enterprise that has existed for generationsproviding food, incomes, and self-employment. They know that circumstances beyond their control make this hope difficult and some changes are needed. Women are particularly strong-minded about keeping the family farm because it allows them to provide some of their family dietary needs, and have an independent source of income without having to leave the farm and the home.There is no doubt that the region's food production systems, food security and the sustainable development of villages, towns and societies are heavily dependent on the small producers and the family farms of the Caribbean. However, because of years of neglect, negative stereotyping, and lack of support from government policies as well as agricultural research, education, technical and extension services, many have fallen below, or are at subsistence levels of production, others have simply migrated entirely out of agriculture..To strengthen the small producer and the family farming system we need to fully understand the nature of the farmer, the family, the systems of production, gender issues and the rationale behind the farming practices adopted by the small producer and the farm family unit. Participatory research and development (PRD) approaches have been found to be the most suited to collect and analyse this information along with the farming family. The process can be a dialectical one in which the scientists/extensionists collects data and at the same time disseminate information that can help the small-scale food producer to enhance her/his adaptive capacity and resilience. Through the PRD process the farming members can become architects of their own farming practices and farm management.Data collected from PRD can be used to inform policies and national investment decisions that can revitalise family farming and enhance the role of women farmers. Further, the following recommendations are made that may be interrelated and therefore not exclusive or exhaustive.• Increase access to and control over productive resources, including land (tenure), water, credit, technology and extension services;| 29The Role of Small Producers, Family Farms and Women Farmers in Sustainable Food Production and Food Security• Additional agricultural biodiversity support for plant and livestock materials that can strengthen the resilience of local food systems and ensure food safety;• Closer linkages between what farmers are producing and the nutritional value recommended by the Caribbean Food and Nutrition Institute (CFNI);• Improve local and regional food markets and place them under the control of small producers and family farms. Designs of systems should collectively evolve from farmers, scientists, marketers and consumers so as to provide high quality food from farmers that are accessible to all;• Engage in more collective use of resources and lobbying (because of economies of scale) through establishing or strengthening farmers' organisations and cooperatives;• Strengthen the organizational skills, financial accountability and economic viability of individual farm enterprises as well as farmers' groups so that in the long term the management of certain support services can be transferred from governments to farmers and their organizations;• Work with farmers to develop a system of direct financing tailored towards farm families, small producers, and women farmers. Thus, specific credit lines will be established to support self-managed funds of individual farming enterprises as well as for farmers' organisations and co-operatives;• Continue enhanced vocational training for farmers, women and rural youth in all areas of food production, food security and sustainable development is required.Training should include entrepreneurship skills and innovative technologies, but should be in harmony with what is already being practiced on the farm and within the families. This includes how to include young women and men in modern farm technologies and social media that can enhance small producers and family farms without adding high risks, real or perceived. Farmer to farmer training methods has proven to be most appropriate and should be readily adopted;• Provide socio-economic safety net packages to small producers and family farms that protect then from the repercussions of natural disasters, failed new methods of farming, as well as change in market demands. This should include remittances to reinvest in farming activities as well as for meeting the needs of households and families.While all the recommendations discussed above should be gender sensitive, gender specific considerations and recommendations are also suggested. Currently, most national, regional and international food production policies and plans included addressing gender issues and women's role in agriculture. However, invariably these are included as add-ons and/or treated as separate concerns and solutions. By themselves, they fail to address the differences in the resources available to men and women, their roles, the constraints they face -and how these differences might be relevant to proposed interventions for women farmers. It is also assumed that interventions in areas such as technology, extension services, credit, infrastructure, and market access will have the same impacts on women as they do for men, when in fact they do not. As a result, the following gender specific recommendations are suggested that can enhance women's full participation in food production and food security strategies:• Increase efforts to collect and analyse gender disaggregated data in order to understand role differences in food and cash crop production as well as men's and women's differential managerial and financial control over production, storage and marketing of agricultural products;• Ensure that women have equal opportunities as men to own land, have access to agricultural services, including technology, farming incentives, training and extension. Equally important too, is that these services and resources should be tailored to meet women's specific farming needs;• Focus on appropriate inputs and technology that can 'free up' women's time on the farm and in the home so that they can balance their domestic responsibilities with farming activities;• Link what is grown, sold, processed or prepared for the home to the nutritional status of families especially children, as well as the general population;• Review government policies and re-orient them to ensure that all constraints to women's roles in food production and in food security are addressed. This includes access to resources and services for women managed farms, as well as better employment and income earning opportunities for women with equal pay and social benefits linked to family care taking;• Support and encourage women's organizations and networks. Include representation from these groups at all levels of planning, training, decision-making and policy formulation that relate to small producers, family farms, and women farmers.The average age of farmers in the region is estimated to be over 50 years with some countries averaging over 60 years. The drudgery, hard work and little financial rewards associated with agriculture seem to be the major deterrents to young persons entering the sector. This perception of the sector as not being profitable has been actively promoted by many successful farmers, who for reasons of tax evasion and concessionary treatment, proclaim a litany of woes and do all in their power to discourage new entrants. While several initiatives have been tried in the region to reverse this situation, the problem still persists and has now become more urgent.We live in a changing world that has the ability to provide the youth of today a life incomparable to their ancestors. They have access to educational systems that prepare them to be forward thinkers, access to resources that can provide them a sense of financial security, and technology that puts the world at their fingertips. Despite this plethora of resources and access, many youth across the globe will never have a taste or a glimpse of this life. Their lives will be shaped by a more dismal side of life that plagues over three quarters of youth living in developing countries (Bennell 2007;World Bank 2006). These youth experience successes and failures due to the political frameworks and bureaucratic arrangements in society. There is however, the opportunity to challenge these conditions through policies and actions that deepen the context of living for youth, especially those who live in the rural bellies of society.To a large extent, the successes and failures in rural communities across the globe are shaped by agriculture. Typically, one thinks of agriculture as the bread of life for rural communities because of its ability to provideYouth: Adding Value to Agriculture in the Caribbean and sustain individuals. Agriculture has multiple objectives such as creating employment opportunities, providing raw materials for agro-based industries, ensuring self-sufficiency in food production and food security, servicing of balance of payments, and contributing to the gross domestic product (GDP) (FAO 2002;Young et al. 2001). In some cases, it is the backbone of society and determines the standard of living for large segments of the population. Increasingly agriculture is being viewed through the climate change prism wherein there is significant support for its role in mitigation. For youth, especially those in rural areas, agriculture is a way of life. As such, development experts have suggested that training and programmes should be targeted towards them early in life so that these future farmers may develop critical skills related to new practices, and as adults, will generally be more receptive to the changing face of agriculture. Early exposure will provide youth valuable skills and help them acquire experiences in group processes that will enable them to easily step into adult leadership roles in their communities as part of peoples' participation in activities that contribute to sustainable agricultural and rural development.This chapter is positioned from a context of change and empowerment for youth engagement in agriculture across the Caribbean region. We contend that in order for young people to be fully integrated in society, they must be given the resources to become fully empowered for productivity. Based on an analysis of rural youth agricultural programmes across the globe and the formal reports of Caribbean youth leaders, a model for engagement is proposed. Because of the diversity in the region, a flexible rather than a fixed model is suggested, with each country being able to choose from the essential components to make its own model. Using this approach, we believe that the face and more importantly, the productivity of agriculture can be changed. For this to happen however, young people within the Caribbean must be supported by appropriate, sustainable interventions that allow them to fully engage the sector.The changing face of the twenty-first century must incorporate the new faces of the millennium. Policies and practices must speak to the immediate and long-term needs of youth. They are the future and must be given a template that challenges the status quo and converts theory into practice with a new-world twist. This systematic approach to programming will assist in developing the farming community and agriculture for the next generation. Of the nearly one billion youths between the ages of 15 and 24, approximately 85 percent are from low income countries (Bennell 2007;FAO 2005;ILO 2005), where numerous problems such as inadequate housing, sub-standard health care, pollution, food deficits and deficiencies, rural to urban migration, and high unemployment rates plague the society (Deshingkar 2004). This current situation leads us to believe that it will be difficult to attain sustainable development under such conditions; however, a change is possible if policies and programmes are structured to systematically address these problems. For example, in Africa, nearly 200 million young people are waiting to be educated and prepared for employment. In the Caribbean, Asia, and the Pacific we find a similar situation, whereby youth, especially the rural population on the fringes of society, are last to receive the assistance and support from society. Among all these regions of the world, it has been estimated that the number of rural youth will continue to rise at exponential rates (ECLAC 2008). Unless addressed, today's problems will continue to plague the rural segments of society at ever increasing rates.Youth, in one sense, can be seen as a collective group of people who have the potential to change the world. Despite their age, gender, and geographic location, they have a unique way of approaching life; from a fresh perspective and with zeal. However, due to financial and social barriers for example, many are not given the opportunity to create change or see change happen. For youth in the rural context, especially those in the agricultural sector of society, they are often left out of the equation for development and change. Young people find themselves sitting at the fringe of society looking on as others define their potential. Their lack of access to educational opportunities and limited voice in society are roadblocks to success.The United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) estimates that roughly 30 percent of Latin America's populations are located in rural areas (ECLAC 2008). This astonishingly low figure, translates into an awareness of the needs of this vulnerable population, and rural squatter camps and slums found within the region support a life of hardship for its inhabitants. Rural people, especially the rural poor in developing countries, depend heavily on agriculture as a means of subsistence. Research has shown that between 75 and 85 percent of the rural population in Asian and African countries is engaged in agricultural production (Godfrey 2005). Although these numbers are slightly higher than one would find throughout the Caribbean and Latin America (nearly 50 percent throughout the region), the agricultural sector makes an important contribution to the GDP in many countries in this region. Even more important, is the impact of agriculture on the quality of life of individuals who live in these communities, including rural youth.Youth: Adding Value to Agriculture in the CaribbeanThe ability to keep rural youth interested in living and working to sustain a quality of life is non-negotiable in today's world, and involves the creation of a blueprint of policies to improve inmpoverished conditions. Funding must be provided, and the level of resources available must be improved to deliver a higher quality of life. Policies regarding rural youth must be specific with clear strategies and guidelines to keep them from remaining on the fringes. In addition, in situations of limited resources, as is the case with most Caribbean countries, the funding made available to meet their needs and solve their problems must be used in an efficient manner. While these issues are significant, what is even more important to the development of rural youth, is addressing the changing face of agriculture and farming that confronts this present generation.In the Caribbean as in many other developing countries, while the population of farmers is becoming smaller, the average age of farmers in increasing, and the rate of replacement of older farmers by younger ones is not the same as in the past. Moreover, many countries have dwindling extension services to support farmers, both young and old, while simultaneously budgets are being redirected to support other programmes deemed more important. Youth in agriculture programmes are therefore not given the attention that is required. Under the circumstances with these challenges a decrease has been observed in the size of local and national economies, something which impacts the quality of inputs, agricultural production, staff and particularly extension and training for farming communities. Rural youth agricultural programmes that focus on building leadership skills and agriculture knowledge, and reinforcing critical thinking and moral development suffer curriculum and staff cutbacks. There has also been a discontinuation of financial incentives to stimulate and support youth involvement.Moreover, the non-formal educational component which has been a staple component in rural agricultural learning is often not given the adequate attention it deserves in order to meet the needs of rural youth. The lack of staff, resources, training, and funding hinders the total growth and development for rural youth, and while these issues may be seen as formidable challenges for governments to overcome, they can be improved in the short to medium term. In this discussion, the essential components of a model for the constructive engagement of young people are being suggested. It is hoped that this will assist the youth to become more engaged in the agricultural sector as productive constituents empowered by facilitating policies and organizations, thus enabling them to utilise modern technology in a business-like manner to achieve economic independence. At the same time, they will also become vested citizens in society helping to address societal issues such as criminal activity, poverty and economic destabilization.Transformational learning as defined by Hart (2006) is regarded as the intersection between service learning and critical pedagogy. Students learn to analyse their civic attitudes, assumptions, and actions through political, economic, and social conditions and inequalities that exist in everyday life. Daigre (2000) contended that young people engaging in transformational learning must begin by problematizing the power structures they experience in their community, and to a larger extent in society and should be encouraged to ask critical questions about the implications of these structures. One practical way students can analyse power structures is by re-examining the formal classroom versus the informal classroom structure. Instead of viewing schools as the keeper and disseminator of knowledge, students work to solve problems and become engaged as agents of change in their communities. In this way they become both leaders and teachers helping to change the society in which they live. Young people are in positions to transform 'facets of school life that may have served to alienate and oppress students' (Hart 2006).As young adults and youth become aware of concepts of leadership and change, they should then also begin examining how to create meaningful change. Only through an examination of these structures will students begin moving toward a true appreciation for agriculture (Hart 2006). For example, students who live in communities with rampant poverty could learn to openly create spaces with politicians, community leaders, social policy, and media messages to find solutions for the problem. For this to happen however, youth relationships with agriculture must be actively supported by opportunities within the current infrastructures and powers that exist.To facilitate the inquiry of change, youth and communities must re-frame the inquiry from the individual to the systemic (Bickford and Reynolds 2002). For example, when investigating issues of participation in agriculture, youth should re-frame, 'what can this do for me?' to a state of 'what can I offer to this?' Similarly, Daigre (2000) advocated for the analysis of the root cause of social problems by questioning the current political system and the social injustices embedded within them. Youth must be encouraged to look for the links between the entrenched institutional systems and how these impact their present position. Just as imperative as questioning the political systems, students must also learn to critically analyse their personal role in the system (Freire 1998). Hart (2006) suggested that youth must constantly reflect on stereotypes and assumptions they may have about the population they are serving, how their individual actions affect power dynamics, and how their work connects to the larger political and social structures. This is essential for youth to make a difference in any sphere, more so in the area of food production.Youth: Adding Value to Agriculture in the CaribbeanIn order to effect a true change in the lives of rural youth, especially those engaged in agriculture, the central thesis of the discussion posits that there must be a rethinking, a paradigm shift in how we view youth in these areas. Youth must now be seen as viable individuals who have the ability to meaningfully contribute to the fabric of society. They have the ability to think, develop and act in a way that can cause serious change. They must not be treated as outcasts of the society, but rather as individuals who, when given the opportunity along with the correct tools and resources, and with sincere, meaningful support and guidance, can make a difference. They can, if their potential is properly directed, add tremendous value to agriculture. The YMD approach also makes some basic assumptions about government and its position on youth and agriculture. These include:1. Promoting youth in agriculture high on the agenda of national governments.2. Full commitment by governments to providing the funding and resources needed for youth development and agriculture.3. Incorporating youth and agriculture as key aspects of their plans of work.4. Setting realistic goals and benchmarks to measure development.5. Including youth voices in the vision for agricultural development.6. Viewing youth as part of the solution and not the problem.These points, juxtaposed against our vision of youth engagement can lead to a paradigm shift in the way we approach programming for rural youth involved in agriculture.A review of several programmes across the Caribbean, Latin American, and the West African region reveals that most youth agricultural programmes within rural regions focus on building skills and moral development. Many programmes are grounded in developing positive character development and morals through Christian-based activities, such as the Young Boys and Girls Programme of Kenya. These programmes primarily focus on young people between the ages of eight and 18 who are still living with their parents. Young people attend day camps or after-school activities, which are monitored and/or facilitated by an adult. The take away message for youth involved in these programmes appears to be that in order to make it in life, one needs to be a good citizen. No emphasis is placed on building agricultural or leadership skills, as is the case in other youth programmes in the more tropical regions of the world.Among many Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries, the thrust of youth development programmes is built on the US model of 4-H. While the basis of this model was created to train rural youth throughout the United States in the early 1800s in agricultural production and canning, the format has morphed into a program for engaging youth in positive activities in the twenty-first century. This programme provides youth with opportunities to build important skills such as leadership, communication, and character building. The overwhelming majority of these experiences are embedded within a nonformal educational framework to allow for flexibility and making the youth voice heard. Within the LAC context, the 4-H model entails a number of key characteristics of the US model, while embracing local culture and context. For example, the curriculum is translated into local languages and is often tailored to meet the specific needs of the targeted youth. While these activities focus on the overall development of the youth, many do not incorporate the agricultural knowledge needed to thrive in today's agricultural industry, perhaps as a result of the institutionalization of 4-H in society. In some cases, countries incorporate 4-H as fully funded and supported programme within a Ministry (i.e. Ministry of Education or Ministry of Agriculture), while others treat it as a stand-alone programme that requires a cast of dedicated volunteers and funding for support. Because many young people view the 4H programme as a school activity, very few make the transition to becoming full-fledged members of the farming community.An offshoot of the 4-H model have been the grassroots efforts observed in countries such as Jamaica and Barbados, where concerned individuals who see the need to educate the young while preserving culture and agriculture, have started local programmes for youth, which involve bringing youth onto their farms to teach them about agriculture and its benefit to themselves and their country. These programmes, which also have a mentorship aspect, teach young people about farming practices that are sometimes seen as traditional, but yet are being promoted by scientists in classrooms in other parts of the world as sustainable methods. Fundamental to this type of programme is recognition of the benefits to be derived from engaging youth in a waning industry, while also teaching them about a culture that has fed and sustained society. As such, the creation of a core cohort of youth who are able to become citizens who have an appreciation for farming while also being able to sustain their own lives in a holistic manner, is considered a major outcome of this drive. In spite of their good intentions however, these programmes do not form an integral part of the institutional fabric of developing nations.Youth: Adding Value to Agriculture in the CaribbeanProgrammes such as the Youth Apprenticeship Programme in Agriculture (YAPA) and the Youth Enterprise Initiative in Trinidad and Grenada respectively, are examples of programmes embedded into the core of the central government. Ministries of agriculture and education take a vested interest in the development of young people and help to create programmes that assist in enhancing their agricultural knowledge and skills. In the case of the YAPA programme for example, youth are able to gain agricultural knowledge through hands-on activities, which are facilitated by local farmers who share their knowledge via on-farm demonstrations and other types of experiential activities. These government-led programmes provide a realistic view of agriculture and give their participants a template from which to begin their agricultural careers, with the youth involved being given the opportunity to put their knowledge to practice through the management of their own plots and small enterprises, something that is considered a necessary and beneficial component of the skill building process. Nevertheless, despite serving as a mechanism to provide youth with a chance to venture into commercial agriculture, the efficacy of the programme has been questioned as a result of the lack of government follow through in areas such as training, pre-and post-funding and land for farming. The depth and breadth of the programmes have also been queried due to a lack of vision and questionable management practices.The Agricultural Professionals Development Programme (APDP) in Trinidad and Tobago was initiated by the Ministry of Food Production as a means of increasing the number of farmers in the country. It was designed to boost the capacity of agriculture graduates to meet the challenges impacting the domestic agricultural sector, and is in line with the Ministry's National Food Production Action Plan for the period 2012-2015. The APDP operates as a platform for engagement of graduates with a vision, 'to assist Trinidad and Tobago to become a more food-secure nation through the creation of a globally competitive workforce of agricultural graduates through professional and technical skills enhancement within a motivational and structured environment' (IICA 2012). Graduates with a degree in Agriculture or Agribusiness have an opportunity to embark upon a one year customized internship in one of five areas namely Crop Production, Livestock Production, Aquaculture, Agribusiness or Agro-processing (IICA 2012).The Helping out our Primary and Secondary Schools (HOOPSS) programme in St Lucia is described as playing an important role in the socioeconomic fabric of St Lucian households, especially in rural areas (IICA 2012), due to dwindling youth participation in agriculture. HOOPSS is built on a philosophy that only the actual engagement of young persons in theoretical and practical farming best-practice can provide that critical knowledge necessary for sustainable employment and ultimately, household food security (IICA 2012). The project also seeks to sensitize and expose students to the viability of agriculture as a business, and to promote the creation of agricultural leaders through school gardens and farm activities. Ultimately, it is hoped that this will drive the development of agriculture in St Lucia and as well, address food security and nutritional concerns of the school feeding programme. Success is based on continuous collaboration amongst its many stakeholders, mainly, the Ministry of Agriculture (technical support), IICA (implementation support), and a number of formal linkages with actual markets such as the primary school feeding programmes, local restaurants, hotels, and most notably, Consolidated Foods Limited (CFL) a major supermarket on the island.The Gilbert Agricultural and Rural Development Centre (GARDC) in Antigua started as a pilot project before being formalized with external funding (Maximay 2005). Its mission is to develop and maintain a demonstration centre to serve the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), by providing a place for practical, hands-on training in sustainable good agricultural practices that protect natural resources to assist the nation with food security and poverty alleviation. The centre, which has offered agricultural and enterprise training mainly to youth between the ages of 16 and 30 years since 1993, focuses on life and entrepreneurial skills development, with a specific emphasis on the use of natural resources in agriculture and other forms of rural enterprise.The above review suggested that agricultural development directed at youth in rural areas of the world has been supported by a variety of models ranging from government supported, top-down approaches, to a more grassroots-type orientation funded by local citizens, and others supported by regional agricultural organisations. Notwithstanding, the economic hardships, agricultural downsizing, and inadequate funding for youth programmes and agricultural services, for any intervention to have meaningful impact, it must incorporate basic youth development elements along with core agricultural components. The review of a number of youth agricultural programmes across the Caribbean, Latin America, and Africa, has brought to the fore essential issues that can promote youth involvement in the sector, and allow them to add value to the sector.Taking all this into consideration, the essential components of a model will now be offered to help address some of the inherent issues countries face when trying to assist rural youth. Any, or all of these components, can be used by countries to construct their own templateThe framework presented in figure 2.1 serves to explain the central thesis of the discussion, that youth should be seen as key actors in the chain who can add value to agriculture. As presented by the FAO ( 2013), the framework is built around the core value chain in which value chain actors, i.e., those who take ownership of the product, and who produce or procure from the upstream level, add value to the product, and then sell it on to the next level. Value chain actors are mostly private sector enterprises, but can include public sector organizations such as institutional buyers (e.g., food reserve agencies, emergency food buyers such as the World Food Programme [WFP]), and even youth. Value chain actors are sustained by business development support providers who do not take ownership of the product, but who play an essential role in facilitating the value creation process. Along with the value chain actors, these support providers represent the extended value chain. Three main types of support providers can be distinguished. Firstly, there are those who supply physical inputs, such as seeds at the production level or packaging materials at the processing level. Secondly, there are the service providers in areas such as field spraying, storage, transport, laboratory testing, management training and market research. Thirdly, are the providers of financial services, which are separated from other services given the fundamental role played by working and investment capital in getting the value chain on a path of sustained growth. The facilitation of access to inputs and services then becomes essential for youth if their roles as actors in a value chain are to be fully actualised. A critical element of the core value chain is its governance structure.Governance refers to the nature of the linkages between actors at different links in the chain, and within the overall chain. As related to youth, some higher levels of governance and management of youth development in the sector would be another critical element for youth as agriculture promoters.Value chain actors and support providers operate in a particular enabling environment in which social and natural environmental elements can be distinguished. Social elements refer to the man-made creations that make up a society, and which can be grouped into four types: socio-cultural elements (consumer preferences, religious requirements), organizational elements (national inter-professional associations, research and educational facilities), institutional elements (regulations, laws), and infrastructural elements (roads, ports, communication networks, energy grids). Thus communities, schools, neighbourhoods, regional and international organisations, concerned leaders of farmer groups, and civic minded citizens, all have roles to play in creating the enabling environment for increased youth participation in the food sector. The sustainability of the value chain plays out simultaneously along three dimensions -the economic level, the social level and at the level of the environment, all of which must be given adequate attention by all youth supporters.As a constituency, youth add value to the chain of food production as key actors and their views must be factored into any decisions to be taken concerning their sustained involvement in the agriculture sector. A key statement by a youth leader in the region advised that 'youth need to be properly prepared for the positions made available to them. There shouldn't be a strong sense of entitlement that the government should provide any and all opportunities' (CARICOM 2012). Nevertheless, there are issues that constrain youthYouth: Adding Value to Agriculture in the Caribbean participation in the food production sector, which were extensively discussed at the regional level meeting of Caribbean youth leaders in Antigua, in 2012. Some key issues raised are listed below (CARICOM 2012);• Technical competence achieved through training programmes Many opportunities and action areas were suggested by participants at the forum which they genuinely believed would assist them to make a successful entry into, and have a sustainable livelihood in the sector. These included:• Focusing on specialty production modes such as nutraceuticals, culinary herb trays, branded produce (e.g. Fairtrade)• Exploring linkages with tourism• Informing youth of the opportunities that exist in the agribusiness sector• Initiating an internship programme to allow students to hone their skills• Exposing youth to all forms of protected agriculture and other climate-smart production systems• Providing services in marketing, landscaping etc.• Rebranding 'farming' to 'food production' in an effort to delink with the negative connotations of traditional farming• Teaching agriculture at all the primary and secondary schools• Developing a mechanism for information sharing among youth and more experienced farmers in the technical aspects of food production to enable them to become entrepreneurs, as against being labourers• Encouraging greater use of modern technology and the social media• Teaching agriculture in an interactive manner rather than classroom/textbook mainly • Considering opportunities in culinary tourism• Exploring post-harvest areas such as packaging and marketing of products• Considering nutrition security as an issue to be of equal or greater importance than food security• Revitalising the 4H movement as an organisation which can help promote agriculture among youth• Highlighting the successes in agriculture so that young persons may be encouraged to consider getting involved in the sector• Developing a regional initiative to promote youth in agriculture The two major recommendations coming out of the exercise included:• Inviting policymakers to future youth fora so that they can be more enlightened on the issues; and• Advocating and lobbying for greater collaboration between the Ministries of Agriculture and Education since both have a tremendous impact on the decision made by youth to enter the agriculture sector.Taking all of the above into consideration, Figure 2.2 is a diagrammatic representation of several issues that we believe impact youth development on the food production sector. Each of these issues is now discussed under three Identify the constituents: the focus should be primarily on graduates, whether from the universities in the region or technical colleges. New agriculture requires persons prepared to innovate, use modern technology and who are business oriented, something for example, that is in line with the Sudanese model project titled 'Graduate Employment Fund Program for 2005-2008' 1 . Agriculture must be seen as a worthy profession and not as something only pursued by those who fail in the formal education system. While there will always have to be training for young persons who are not academically inclined, a development model must of necessity focus on those constituents who are most likely to succeed in the achievement of national food security goals.Promote education and training: opportunities for youth to be trained to understand the sector and work efficiently in the sector are important. These educational experiences must prepare youth to tackle the changing tides of agriculture. Cutting edge resources, technology, and other innovative tools must be introduced in order to truly prepare youth for the agricultural industry.Emphasise experiential learning: while classroom work is important, more emphasis is required on practices. Although the YAPA model in Trinidad and Tobago was assessed and found to have a good mix of classroom and experiential learning activities, the latter were called into question particularly as there was inadequate preparation for the 'new agriculture', with still too much emphasis placed on traditional methods of field-based farming in the sun for long hours using minimum technology (Ganpat and Webster 2007). This is certainly not going to attract young persons into agriculture, so it is important that an engaging and interactive curriculum, together with use of latest technology and techniques, be developed to fully engage youth in the field.Encourage mentorship: the use of business and technical mentors will always be a critical aspect of the proposed transformation of youth involvement in the food sector, especially in the Caribbean, where there are few role models in the form of successful farmers who are prepared to state publicly that the sector is a lucrative one. What one however generally finds is an environment in which the elders convey extremely negative messages to youth about the sector so that it becomes more difficult to encourage youths, especially where they have access to other options, to take an interest and be involved in agricultural production.Youth: Adding Value to Agriculture in the Caribbean Mentors with positive dispositions can therefore help direct youth to successful engagement in the sector.Promote the sector: the food sector has never been proactively sought out by the brightest and the best to lead the transformation, and is not promoted as one of first choice, despite its importance, profitability and current high profile as a mitigation avenue against climate change. National, and even regional communication/promotional programmes or campaigns on a sustained basis can bring the message to an otherwise distracted youth population.Highlight linkages: the importance of agriculture can be reinforced by demonstrating its linkages to other sectors such as health (from a nutritional standpoint), tourism, infrastructure (e.g. soft engineering solutions for slope protection) and sport (field/pitch/ course management). Youth can also assist in bringing to the fore other areas which can be directly or indirectly linked to agriculture.Teach values: this includes respecting and valuing the environment (flora and fauna, water, and the earth). It is insufficient to teach future farmers skills without providing a sense of value for the environment and encouraging sustainability.Teach self-reliance: an emphasis must be placed on broadening the scope of agriculture for it to be viewed as a sustainable and acceptable career. Caribbean youth need to be encouraged and empowered to become problem solvers. The time has passed for the promotion of the traditional approach, which upholds the government as some sort of generous benefactor that provides all that is needed. Actions that build self-confidence and self-reliance will not only contribute to transforming Caribbean agriculture, but societies in general.Encourage innovation: young persons must be taught to experiment and innovate. New agriculture will require constant innovation for farmers to maintain a competitive edge over foreign products. This skill has to be learnt and should form part of the learning experiences. Youth should be encouraged to be innovative and both adopt and adapt strategies that can be used to explore new and emerging opportunities in intellectual property, including branding and utility models, agriculture, and in science and technology.Teach business skills: traditional training is generally insufficient as it is geared towards improving production skills in situations where there is generally poor farm record keeping across the region. This is insufficient. Post-production and marketing skills are equally important for young people to successfully engage the market economy, and source external markets. Computers and other communication devices must be seen as primary tools for young people in this regard.Teach sustainability: the resources in the region are quite limited and must be used in a productive manner in the present, while maintaining productivity for future farmers. This will require a reorientation of training at all levels, starting at the university level, where issues of sustainability do not take precedence in most curricula.Provide land for farming: farmers in the region cannot practise extensive forms of agriculture due to limited land areas. Modern agriculture, which is land intensive, requires smaller parcels of land and is regarded as the preferred option today. There are several forms of agriculture that do not require very fertile lands, e.g., protected agriculture using soil-less media, vermiculture, and biotechnology. Agro-based industries also do not require large land spaces to be successful.Create a credit/Fund programme: this can be set up to assist graduates who wish to engage in small-and medium-sized projects. This is in line with the aforementioned Sudan model, and the 'Youth Window', a former project of the Agricultural Development Bank (ADB) in Trinidad and Tobago, which had some success. There is also a need for venture capital and humane financing provisions to encourage youth to engage credit arrangements.Development of partnerships: linkages with organizations and institutions should be actively promoted, and because the sector is diverse, assistance may have to come from a range of sources. Young farmers must be placed in direct contact with these agencies to access information and other support in a timely manner. Linkages with other sectors are also crucial. The tourism and food and beverage sectors can promote wider markets for products.Continuous monitoring and evaluation: any model geared at effective change would need to be constantly monitored, evaluated and modified where necessary. In a dynamic sector like agriculture, to allow mechanisms to run on for years without evaluation is tantamount to abandoning a seedling or new born livestock.To outsiders, the Caribbean may appear as one people, and indeed, it is in some respects. However, a closer look will reveal tremendous diversity, and while this is cherished among Caribbean people, it makes development planning somewhat difficult. In the foregoing analysis, this diversity in social and cultural areas, economic resources, human resource capacities, land availability and topographies is acknowledged. It is for this reason thereforeYouth: Adding Value to Agriculture in the Caribbean that neither the pattern of other development initiatives is followed, nor is a fixed model offered for promoting youth involvement in the agriculture sector. Instead, based on a review of international experiences with youth in agriculture programmes, a range of components is proposed that could be included in any intervention. A particular country or grouping of countries may choose to incorporate componenets into a culturally and socially acceptable model that is in line with resources and development goals. Because the construction of a definitive model will take a multitude of Caribbean experiences gathered overtime, for now, only the essential components have been identified as we edge towards a model.The Caribbean, like many other regions in the tropical ecological zone, has serious food and protein security issues given the escalation in grain prices. This is primarily because 80 percent of the region's meat supply comes from poultry. To address this issue, rabbit production was identified by governments within the Caribbean Region as a viable alternative to enhance protein security and food sovereignty. The production of rabbits and ducks in the Caribbean is generally based on small-scale, backyard and low input systems. The fast growth rate of rabbits (compared to chicken), their short generation interval and ability to convert forages into high quality protein (Leng 2008) are attributes that make them ideal for a role in enhancing protein security in the Caribban Region. Over the last decade, while levels of rabbit production have increased in Trinidad and Tobago, demand still outstrips supply. This has resulted in a move from small backyard production to medium-sized intensive commercial and semi-commercial production systems.In tandem with this, there has also been an increase in duck production regionally and globally, with a similar trend observed towards intensive and semi-intensive type production systems. For centuries, ducks have provided an important source of animal protein for the people of Asia, where domestic duck farming originated. For these populations, duck meat and eggs have, and continue to be, important sources of high quality dietary protein, energy, vitamins and minerals. In 1996, over 2.5 million metric tons (MT) of duck meat were produced globally, an increase of 11 percent over the previous year. This was the highest increase in the poultry sector for the corresponding period, with chicken increasing only by 4.3 percent Small Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducksand turkey by 3.2 percent. Similarly in Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana and Suriname, such trends can also be observed. Many farmers are either increasing their stock or new farmers are establishing duck enterprises. Several factors have helped to sustain this trend, including the duck's ability to adapt to a range of environments and the fact that ducks are considered to be hardy animals and show greater resistance to many common diseases and parasites than other domestic poultry. Ducks therefore require a less rigid vaccination programme than broiler chickens. They are however, very susceptible to mycotoxins, and as a result, management of this factor is very important in their production. Another factor also driving increased duck production is the mushrooming of Chinese restaurants, particularly in Trinidad and Tobago, Suriname and Guyana.Before starting a farm, or when evaluating an existing enterprise, farmers should make every effort to gather as much information on all relevant aspects of production and marketing. The information acquired should be used to guide both the establishment and day-to-day management of the farm. The following are some key areas that should be taken into consideration when beginning an enterprise, and which can serve as a guide for success:• What to sell: Identify and define exactly the products that are to be producedbreeding stock, fryers, fertile eggs, day-old ducklings, rabbits and ducks for the live or processed market.• What the market requires: Find out exactly what are the market requirements and standards in terms of breeds, market weight, and carcass quality.• How much the market requires: This influences the scale of the operation necessary to produce a set level of output.• When the product is required: Determine trends in market demand and market prices. Is it a seasonal or year-round market?• Who are the consumers: Identify the target market(s).• The best way to get the product to consumers: What is the best method of marketing or selling the product?• Breeds and adaptability: Consider the breeds available, their uses and performance under the prevailing environmental conditions in which they will be reared.• Performance standards of the breeds: The ability of available breeds to produce the desired output in the environment in which they will be producing.• How best to house and manage the stock: Identify the most appropriate production system and technology that should be used, considering the level of available resources and the planned output of the farm.| 55Small Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks• Source and availability of duck and rabbit feed: The availability of a continuous source of high quality life cycle feeds.• How to keep the stock healthy: Seek guidance on the best health maintenance programme.• Plans for expansion: Current demand and market trends are good indicators of future demand, and ultimately influence the scale of the operation and plans for expansion.• Rabbits are reared mainly for their meat in the Caribbean, with a number of breeds and their crosses being found in the region. The most popular ones include:• Flemish Giant: weighing more than 5.5 kg at maturity• Californian: a medium-sized breed, which can reach 4.0 kg at maturity• New Zealand White: animals can attain a weight of more than 4.5 kg at maturity• Chinchilla: there are different strains of this breed, e.g. the giant strain, which can generally weigh more than 6.5 kg at maturity• Crossbreeds: including New Zealand White x Californian, Flemish Giant x New Zealand White, Flemish Giant x Californian, Chinchilla x New Zealand White, Californian x Chinchilla x New Zealand WhiteThe most popular cross however is the New Zealand White and Californian, largely because these breeds and their crossbreds have shown good adaptability to the tropics, as it relates to their 'thermo-tolerance' and performance. The Flemish Giant and Chinchilla are used mainly as terminal sires. The crosses of these breeds show excellent meat: bone ratio.Terminal sires: Sires used in a crossbreeding system in which all their progeny are marketed.The rabbit is a monogastric herbivore and a hind gut-fermenter, with the caecum making up 40 percent of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Thus, the digestive system and the feeding strategy (caecotrophy, the practice of ingesting soft faeces of caecal origin) give the rabbit an advantage over poultry and pigs for use in sustainable farming systems. The caecum with its microbial activity, caecotrophy and high feed intake (between five and 8 g/100g body weight [BW]) is important for digestion, nutrient utilisation and meeting the nutrient requirements of the rabbit. Recycling of nutrients via the consumption of soft faeces (caecotropes) produced from the materials that pass through the caecal cycle, compensate for low or poor quality protein in the diet. 1 The nutrients rabbit require in their feed are grouped into the following categories: protein, carbohydrates, fat, minerals, and vitamins:• Protein -is important for muscle building, and is a major component of the cell membrane, hormones and enzymes. The nutritive value of proteins is dependent on its amino acid composition, the amount of protein consumed by the animal, the portion that is digested in the gut and the portion absorbed as free amino acids or peptides. Because rabbits are non-ruminants they require essential amino acids. In all the amino acids, lysine and methionine are found to be the most deficient because the ingredients used in feed formulations tend to be low in these amino acids. Other amino acids include: isoleucine, tryptophan, leucine, phenylalnine, threonine and valine.Plant proteins used in feeding rabbits fall into two major categories: seed and leaf proteins. Generally, protein meal from legumes and oilseeds are higher in albumin and globulins (soluble protein) thus, the proteins of legumes are normally higher in essential amino acids than cereal grains (high in storage/insoluble protein) (Villamide, Nicodemus, Fraga and Carabaño 2010). Nevertheless, a major constraint associated with their use in the unprocessed form relates to the presence of antinutritional factors (e.g. tannins, trypsin inhibitors, and lectina carbohydratebinding protein), which limits their use. The major protein source used in rabbit concentrate feed is soybean meal.• Carbohydrates -in rabbit feed these comprise sugars and starches, located largely within the plant cell (which are hydrolysed by the endogenous intestinal enzymes of the animal), and cellulose found principally in the cell wall (which is hydrolysed by microbial enzymes, and provides fibre). Compared to starch, sugars (e.g. glucoseSmall Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks and fructose) are readily digested by the animal and absorbed in the small intestine to provide a source of energy (Blas and Gidenne 2010). Starch on the other hand, is nearly completely digested in the GIT of the rabbit but the amount is dependent on the source of the starch and the age of the rabbit. Because rabbits are hindgut fermenters, they are able to digest cellulose and utilise it as an energy source. The fermentative process by caecal microbes produce volatile fatty acids (VFAs) such as acetate, butyrate and propionate, which are absorbed in the hindgut and provide a source of energy for rabbits (Gidenne, Carabaño, Garcia de Blas 2010). Digestive disorders in weaned rabbit may be due to stress brought about by management changes and stress due to physiological changes in the animal. It was normally accepted that digestive disorders in weaned rabbits were due largely to an overload of rapidly fermentable carbohydrate; however the thinking is that the incidence of digestive disorder may be more related to dietary fibre level and a reduction in the starch to fibre ratio in the diet (Gidenne et al. 2010), which can be corrected by increasing the fibre requirements, and lowering the starch content of the diet.• Fat -functions as a primary source of energy, to increase the palatability of the feed and as lubrication in the pelleting process. It also enables the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins in the gut. Adult rabbits appear to have little capacity to digest fat in the small intestine because lipase activity is restricted to the caecum. A high amount of fat in the diet may limit cellulose fermentation in the caecum, resulting in its excretion as a component of the hard faeces.• Minerals and vitamins -these can be satisfied by the use of calcium and phosphorus supplements and a trace mineral salt and vitamin premix in the commercial concentrate, or from the forage portion of the diet.In the Caribbean, rabbits are primarily fed on a forage-based diet supplemented with commercial rabbit feed in a 2:1 ratio to enable a feed conversion ratio (FCR) of 3.0-3.5 g DMI/g BW in grower rabbits. Small-scale backyard farmers generally use higher levels of forages for feeding, as against medium-sized intensive commercial systems, and a commercial rabbit concentrate is fed ad libitum, along with some wilted forage. Rabbits given concentrate (high energy density) will consume 5 g/100g BW. When fed forages alone, they need to consume over 8 g/100g BW. Growing rabbits fed concentrate + wilted forage consume 6.0 to 6.6 g/100g BW on a dry matter (DM) basis and average daily gain (ADG) is between 30-32 g/d in Trinidad (Table 3.1). The following are suggested rates for feeding commercial rabbit concentrate and with forages fed ad libitum: Local forages used to feed rabbits include grasses (e.g. elephant grass -Pennisetum purpureum, para grass -Brachiaria mutica and tanner grass -Brachiara arrecta), legumes (e.g. leucaena -Leucaena leucocephala, tropical kudzu -Pueraria phaseoloides and gliricidia -Gliricidia sepium) and protein tree forages (e.g. Trichanthera -Trichanthera gigantean and rabbit meat -Alteranathera tenella), in which protein is concentrated in the leaves. Forages are normally supplemented with a commercial rabbit concentrate feed in intensive commercial production systems in the Caribbean. There are also some producers who feed a concentrate that has been specially formulated by the feed millers to meet all the nutrient requirements of the rabbit, including the fibre requirements. Agro by-products such as spent brewers grains, vegetable scraps, cassava leaves and meal, and sweet potato slips are also used for feeding rabbits.The greatest challenge to developing sustainable production systems for the Caribbean lies in feeding, as feed costs make up more than 60 percent of total production costs. The escalation in grain prices means that the use of concentrate will have to be minimised, and a greater amount of forages and by-products must be fed. Research has been initiated in the Department of Food Production, Faculty of Food and Agriculture, the University of the West Indies (UWI), St Augustine, Trinidad, in this regard. One study, which examined the use of a combination of forages with reduced concentrate levels for growing rabbits, showed promising results as Table 3 Productivity in the breeding unit is defined as the number of young per doe per unit of time (normally measured over a year). Productivity depends on: the interval between successive kindlings, litter size at birth, and the survival of the young (mortality rate). Rabbits, like all other animals will respond to gentle treatment, thereby allowing the breeder to easily handle and manage them. An animal's temperament is therefore something that should be taken into consideration when selecting rabbits for breeding. For example, if one has an aggressive doe, culling may be advisable since she may produce aggressive off-spring. Formerly, the recommendation of one buck for every ten does was used, however at present this has been adjusted to one buck for 25 to 30 does. Nonetheless, under different climatic conditions and management systems, the breeder will have to make a judgment call to determine the buck: doe ratio best suited for his/her system.Reducing the unproductive period before the first litter can increase rabbit productivity; however, both body development and age must be taken into consideration in order to determine the proper time to breed animals. For example, smaller breeds mature much earlier than the heavier breeds, and does may become receptive to males at 3.5 months of age and so capable of conception at 4-4.5 months. However, the time animals are bred is not only dependent on age but also based on physical observation of body condition. At the University of the West Indies field station (UFS) in Trinidad, mating is done at 6.5 months, which is usually the time when the animal is sexually mature, and has the body condition to sustain the reproductive function. Medium-sized breeds like New Zealand White and When feeding rabbits you should:• Preferably feed them in the evening, at the same time each day• Provide a good fibre source to prevent enteritis• Not feed large amounts of highly soluble carbohydrate• Wilt green forages overnight when these are to be fed• Ensure a supply of fresh potable water is available at all times (1 nipple /2-3 animals is sufficient)Californian can be first bred at five to six months of age, while this is done at six to seven months of age with a larger breed such as the Flemish Giant. It should be noted too, that nutrition has a strong influence on the age at first mating, and does should not be served until they reach 80-85 percent of the mature body weight recommended for the breed, even if they may have attained the appropriate age.In most domestic mammals, ovulation takes place at regular intervals when female is in oestrus (heat). The female rabbit does not have an oestrous cycle with a regular period of heat, and so does are considered to be in oestrus 'permanently', with ovulation occurring only after mating. The rabbit is therefore referred to as a reflex ovulator. Ova released without fertilisation may accompany a pseudo-pregnancy which may last 15-17 days. Signs of heat in rabbits include: chinning, attempts to join other rabbits in nearby cage, and the vulva appearing pink and moist. Does are always taken to the male for mating where she will readily accept the buck (Figure 3.2). The doe may fight with the buck if he is placed in her pen and may cause injury to the buck. Sometimes, a doe may need to be restrained in order for mating to occur. In other cases, she may refuse one male, but when placed with another male, will readily accept him and mate.The gestation period in the rabbit generally averages 31-32 days and is influenced by the size of the litter being carried. Prior to parturition, the does will show maternal behaviour such as nest building, so that part of the management process must be the provision of a nest box measuring 40 cm x 30 cm x 30 cm. During this period the doe will pull hair from around the nipple area on the belly and dewlap, which will be used to build the nest in the box provided (Figure 3.3). The nest building behaviour observed appears to be linked to an increase in the oestrogen: progesterone ratio, as well as the secretion of prolactin. Note however, that the doe does not always make a nest and may sometimes kindle (give birth) outside the nest box. As with other animals, the secretion of corticosteroids by the adrenal glands of the young appear to play a role in signalling the onset of parturition, which usually occurs early in the morning, and lasts approximately 30 minutes, with kits being born at intervals of one to five minutes. Box 3.2 provides a summary of the best practices that can be used for breeding rabbits.Small Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and DucksIn breeding rabbits it is important to remember that:• The female should always be taken to the male for mating• After copulation the female should be immediately removed from the male and returned to her pen for maternal preparation• The doe should not be mated if she is not at the required weight, even if she has attained the age of puberty• Females that have a high service to conception ratio should be culled• Females with more than eight parturitions should be culled• A nest box should be provided at least two days before parturitionRabbits should never be lifted by their ears or legs, as this can lead to permanent damage. Small rabbits or fryers should be lifted and carried by gently grasping the animal firmly with the heel of the hands in the areas on its back close to the tail to avoid damaging the pelt or carcass (Figure 3.4). Heavier rabbits should be carried by grasping a fold of skin over the shoulder with one hand, and placing the other hand under the rump to support the weight of the animal (Figure 3.5).El Kholy (2011) indicated that the thermoneutral zone (TNZ) for rabbits ranged from 21°C-25°C. Alnaimy, Fayez, Habeeb and Marai (1994) however cited a temperature of 21°C. For temperatures outside this zone, the rabbit will experience heat stress and has to expend energy to maintain its core temperature. Thus, when the ambient temperature is above 25-30°C, the animal changes its posture and stretches itself out in order to lose heat by radiation and convection. During this period the ear (which acts like a radiator) temperature increases, and the efficiency of cooling will be influenced by the air speed around the animal (Habeeb, Marai, El-Maghawry and Gad 1997). French researchers have recommended a relative humidity of 60-65 percent as optimum for rabbits. Within the tropics temperature and humidity are two key elements that influence thermoregulation, with temperature being the most dominant factor. Because these two factors influence the heat stress experienced by rabbits in a tropical environment, they have consequences for housing design.Environmental stress has a negative impact on the production and performance of rabbits, which tend to achieve homeostasis by regulating their internal body temperature through changes in skin temperature, ear temperature, and respiratory rate under unfavourable environmental conditions. As temperature increased from 20°C to 33°C, Lebas, Coudert, De Rochambeau and Thébault (1986) reported an increase in rectal temperature by 3.6 percent for New Zealand White and 3.1 percent for Californian White. Skin temperature increased by 0.27°C, and respiratory rate increased by seven percent for every 1°C change in ambient temperature. A 50 percent increase in water consumption was reported as temperature rose from 20°C to 30°C (Marai and Ali 2004).Thermoneutral zone: The range of environmental temperatures over which the heat produced by a warm-blooded animal remains fairly constant.The ability or tendency of an organism or cell to maintain internal equilibrium by adjusting its physiological processes.Housing systems recommended for commercial rabbit production in the Caribbean are hutches made entirely of wire mesh, situated in covered areas, either suspended from the roof or placed on stands which are further enclosed in an open-sided-house (Figure 3.6). Utilising the open-sided house design facilitates a favourable environment. The design and dimensions of housing systems are important since these can have a direct impact on the housing micro-climate (i.e. environment), the animals' metabolic rate, health, welfare and production (depending on the stocking density). Rastogi (1991) recommended a hutch size of 0.76 m x 0.76 m x 0.46 m for rabbit production in Trinidad. The NRC (1996) has recommended a space allowance of 1,350cm 2 for rabbits less than 2 kg, and 1,200cm 2 for growing rabbits less than 10 weeks old, to allow for the appropriate cage space required to facilitate the increased activity and rapid locomotion of the growing rabbit (Figure 3.7).Stocking densities above the optimum have been found to negatively affect animal health, performance and carcass quality (Yakubu, Adua and Adamude, 2008;Szendro and Zotte 2011), but improve the economics of rabbit production (Verspecht et al. 2011;Yakubi and Adua 2010). Studies done on stocking densities for rabbits housed in cages located in naturally ventilated open-sided house at the University of the West Indies Field Station (UFS) rabbitry indicated that 11 to 13 rabbits/m 2 was optimum for animal performance and profitability. The study also indicated that the final market weight of the animal wasSmall Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks influenced by the stocking density (Figure 3.8), due to the impact on feed and water intake (Paul and Lallo 2014).As group size increased, aggressive behaviour was also reported to rise, resulting in animals sustaining lesions to their ears, bodies, tails and genitals (Szendro et al. 2009;Ibrahim, Marai and Ali 2004). Increasing stocking densities have also been found to result in abnormalities in body and fur condition, but Iyeghe and Olorunju (2005) reported that that there is no significant interaction between increasing density and abrasions caused by bites.A sound proper biosecurity programme, along with preventive hygiene, cleaning and disinfection, and adequate ventilation must be put in place to maintain the right environment for healthy rabbits. Rabbits are very susceptible to digestive disturbances and fryers and post-wean kits losses may be greater than 40 percent due to diarrhoea. This can have a severe economic impact on commercial rabbit production in the tropics, and is one of the most common health problems associated with rabbits. There are two principal types of enteric diseases:• Mucoid enteritis (caecal impaction)• Enterotoxaemia caused by Clostridium perfringes and C. spiroforme proliferation in the caecum, both of which produce very potent toxins Several factors lead to enteritis such as: the age, genetics and immune status of the animal, presence of pathogenic microbes in the environment, and environmental factors (e.g. micro-climate and heat stress, biosecurity and nutritional factors). Diets high in fermentable starch (such as carbohydrates) predispose post-weaned rabbits to increased incidences of enteritis, and can be prevented by feeding diets low in starch and high in fibre. Enterotoxaemia is caused by carbohydrate overload of the hind gut, thus providing a substrate for the proliferation of pathogens (e.g. C. spiroforme requires the presence of glucose).Fibre promotes normal motility of the hindgut so that where low fibre diets are fed, these promote hypo-motility resulting in prolonged retention time of digesta in the caecum and changes in caecal pH causing a proliferation of caecal microbes. In a review of several studies, Gidenne et al. (2010) reported that dietary fibre has a favourable effect on rabbit digestive health. In Trinidad, many rabbit farmers place a dry, un-husked coconut in the cages to ensure that animals obtain an adequate supply of dietary fibre in their diet. Excessive protein in the diet of the rabbit has also been linked to digestive disturbances, and Gidenne et al. (2010) also reported that a protein level of 1.8-1.9 g CP/ MJ DE seems adequate to prevent this.Sustainable Food Production Practices in the Caribbean -Volume 2Symptoms: affected rabbits display infected or abscessed areas on hocks, and animals tend to shift their weight onto the non-affected foot.Causative agents: wet floors, irritation from wire rust or rough areas on floors, frequent thumping of feet.Control/prevention: thus involves cleaning the area around the lesion and removing any blood or inflammation, applying the recommended antibiotic ointment, checking for uneven or damaged floors, and in severe cases, culling affected animals.Domestic ducks fall into two genetic classes: the common duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and the Muscovy duck (Cairina moschata). The Muscovy is a breed unrelated to the common duck and has its origins in Brazil, South America (neo-tropics), while the common duck has its origins in Asia. The Pekin duck falls into the classification of common ducks, and along with the Muscovy, are the two most important commercial meat ducks worldwide. The cross between the common duck (Pekin) and the Muscovy is sterile, and is referred to as a 'Mule' duck, which is a fast growing meat-type bird. Depending on the country, this cross is also called the Mulard, Mullard or Moulard duck. Although the origins of the Mule duck are uncertain, it is said to have been developed more than 250 years ago by farmers in Taiwan, who crossed Muscovy males with indigenous females in order to combine the high meat yield of the former, with the high laying rate of the latter. Today, although Mule ducks are grown in large numbers in France and Eastern Europe, the principal production of Mule ducks for meat occurs in the Far East and South East Asia.This breed (Figure 3.9 -page 99) is probably the most popular duck breed reared for meat production. It is well adapted to confinement, making it ideal for commercial production. The Pekin duck is well known for its rapid growth rate and, can reach 3.2 kg in about eight weeks. The mature weight of this breed is about 3.6 and 4.1 kg for ducks and drakes, respectively. The drakes are very fertile, and females are very good layers, producing 150 to 200 eggs per year, with very good shell texture. Pekin eggs usually have good hatchability and are easily incubated artificially. The incubation period lasts for a duration of 21 days like chickens, as against 35-38 days for Muscovy ducks. Nevertheless, a major disadvantage ofSmall Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks this breed is that the Pekin is not a very good setter, and very seldom broods its own eggs or raises its young. This represents a major limitation to small farmers who are forced to use a broody layer hen, (Muscovy ducks or a small artificial incubator). The Pekin duck can also be noisy and is very nervous.The Muscovy duck (Figure 3.10A and 3.10B) is the best multi-purpose (i.e. meat and eggs) breed of ducks. It is normally the breed of choice by small and backyard producers in the region but is also reared by commercial duck farmers. While there are several strains with varied colours, the white is preferred by commercial producers as they produce a high quality carcass. The carcass is larger than that of the Pekin duck, has less fat and larger pectoral muscles. The drakes are approximately 40 percent heavier than the ducks at maturity, weighing up to 5.5 kg, and have a high breast meat yield. The duck weighs approximately 3.2 kg.The Muscovy is classified as a fairly good layer, producing 120 eggs per year, which are medium to fine in texture, have good shell characteristics and excellent hatchability. The ducks lay 20 to 25 eggs per clutch and will proceed to hatch and rear their young. If the number is restricted to about 20, it is not unusual for the duck to hatch and rear all. This makes them good setters with good mothering ability. They are therefore highly favoured by small farmers who use natural incubation. The meat has a gamely taste, is leaner than the Pekin, and is highly favoured by consumers. Since these ducks are nearly mute, this breed is favoured because it is not very noisy, but is however prone to praedial larceny. The Muscovy duck has good grazing or foraging habits, and is therefore excellent for small backyard, semi-intensive or extensive production systems.One disadvantage of this breed is that they exhibit sexual dimorphism. Males are larger than the females, which only attain 60 percent of the weight of males at maturity. The Muscovy is not well-suited to large commercial operations because its level of egg production is lower when compared to the Pekin. The Muscovy can fly well, so it is normally recommended that pinioning be done, particularly where the unimproved strain is being reared. Like chickens, the wild unimproved strain of Muscovy likes to roost at nights. The incubation period for the Muscovy egg is 35-38 days compared to the 21 days the Pekin, as stated above. Because the young take a month longer to come into feather, a longer brooding time is required. Since the plumage is less oily and downy than that of other ducks' feathers, care has to be taken when putting the Muscovy on water, as it is possible that birds can drown, especially the heavy long-winged drake. The claws on the feet are sharper than those of other ducks, so that these birds must be handled carefully, especially the large drakes which are very temperamental and can cause damage to workers.Sexual dimorphism: differences in appearance between males and females of the same species, such as colour, shape, size, and structure.Pinioning: the act of surgically removing one pinion joint, namely the joint of a bird's wing, farthest from the body, to prevent flight.Various strains of this duck, namely multi-coloured and white (which is preferred by commercial producers), can be found (Figures 3.11A and 3.11B). The Mule duck is fast growing and it grows relatively faster than Pekin and Muscovy ducks. Good lines can produce a live weight of 3.7 kg at ten weeks of age and at a FCR of 2.5 (i.e. 2.5 kg feed per kg live weight). This duck does not exhibit sexual dimorphism and produces a good quality carcass that is high in lean meat. The meat also has a soft texture, and similar to that of the Pekin duck. The carcass, while leaner than the Pekin, also retains sufficient subcutaneous fat to produce a succulent flavour following cooking. Mule ducks show good disease resistance, but are sterile.Central Farms is the leading duck producer in Trinidad and Tobago, and also is a major partner in the duck research conducted locally. In collaboration with the Department of Food Production, UWI, St Augustine, a programme was developed to test improved duck breeds and strains from a major international duck breeder under our local conditions. In light of this, studies were undertaken on the performance of Pekin, Muscovy and Mule duck breeds from France and North America. The findings of this research are presented in Tables 3.3 and 3.4, which provide summaries of the performance of Pekin and Mule ducks and Mule ducks alone reared at Central Farms, respectively. Based on the results it was concluded that the Mule duck was the best breed to use locally for commercial production.A major drawback to sustainable duck production however, is the reliance on imported soybean meal and corn. Further, the price increases to which these commodities are subjected, can threaten the sustainability of monogastric animal production in CARICOM (Lallo 1998). Central Farms along with UWI has begun research into this issue since feed costs represent more than 60 percent of total production costs. Work is being done to identify a feed supplement, which is based on by-products from different industries suchSmall Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks as bakeries, snack and cereal manufacturers. The use of ensiled fish waste, protein forages and legumes as a way forward to developing more sustainable feeding systems is also being explored. Source: Lallo and Ramraj (2008)In order for ducks to grow at an optimum rate economically, their nutrient requirements for energy, protein, vitamins and minerals must be met. These nutrients are needed each day to support maximum weight gain in the ducks, and therefore must be present in adequate amounts with no imbalance or excess. As against broilers, the growth of ducks is not influenced by dietary energy concentration and as such, energy must be provided at a level that is most economical (i.e. between 2,890 Kcal/kg and 3,200 Kcal/kg). Since ducks are almost insensitive to excess protein in their feed, the utilisation of diets high in protein is ineffective in attempting to reduce fatness in ducks. Feed restriction may reduce fatness, but will also result in a lower feed conversion. Protein levels in starter rations may range from 18 to 20 percent CP (crude protein) and in grower-finisher rations from 15 percent to 18 percent CP. Scott and Dean (1991) have noted that the ratio of energy to protein (ME: P) is also critical to duck performance. While French researchers have recommended ratios of 17.2 and 20.7 for starter and grower diets (Larbier andLeclercq 1994), the NRC (1994) | 73Small Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks suggested values of 13.0 and 18.8 for these various rations respectively. With respect to the vitamin and mineral requirements of ducks, in commercial diets these are supplied by premixes. There may also be differences in the nutrient requirements among the Pekin, Mule and Muscovy.In intensive systems of production, because the ducks are confined, concentrate feeds are used to supply all their nutritional needs in order to promote a rapid growth rate and high quality carcass. In semi-intensive systems the objective is similar, and while the ducks may forage and consume insects, the contribution of foraging to supplying their nutritional needs is insignificant. In extensive or backyard production systems, the nutritional needs of the ducks are met to some extent by foraging and insect consumption. In such systems however, a large hectarage of land is required, as only 20 to 25 ducks can be supported on 0.4 ha (approximately one acre). Production within this system is also further influenced by the quality and quantity of forage available, and some level of supplementation may therefore become necessary. Generally, large intensive commercial producers use duck feed prepared by feed millers made solely from imported ingredients, thereby posing a challenge to the sustainability of the industry. To address this, locally available agro byproducts can be used in the formulation of custom-made supplements, which can not only meet the nutrient requirements, but also reduce feed costs.Duck feed must be stored away from rodents and insects and in a clean dry place to prevent contamination and mould growth. It should be used within three weeks of the manufactured date or sooner during the rainy season when it is hot and humid, to prevent vitamin loss and mould development. Stale, bad smelling or mouldy feed should never be fed to ducks, as they are extremely sensitive to mould toxins; feed containing as little as 30-40 ppb aflatoxin has been shown to impair protein utilisation. Mould toxins at levels between 60 and 80 ppb can cause damage to the duck's digestive organs, liver, kidneys, muscles and plumage, and reduce growth and feed conversion ratio. Most species of ducks seem very susceptible to heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, and arsenic, which are usually not present at toxic levels in uncontaminated commercial feeds. Because the quality of feed ingredients is also very important, old vitamin/mineral packs should not be used.Feed form is also important to duck performance due largely to the anatomical structure of the bill. The use of a high quality pelleted feed is important to optimise the growth rate and feed efficiency. Performance will decrease as the amount of fine material increases in a bag of pelleted feed, so that although ducks can be fed mash feed, a reduction in growth performance by approximately 10 percent, will be observed when compared with ducks fed pelleted feed. There will also be an increase in feed wastage. Ducklings should be fed a starter diet consisting of pellets of 3.2 mm in diameter, or as crumbles, and after two weeks of age, a grower diet consisting of pellets of 4.8 mm diameter can be fed.The anatomy and feeding habits of the ducks must be considered when designing or selecting feeding and watering equipment. Ducks use a shovel-like action when eating, which the feeders used should facilitate. An adult duck requires approximately 10 cm of feeder space, and feeders and drinkers should be evenly distributed throughout the pen and provided in quantities that would discourage overcrowding, particularly at feeding time.In production systems where feeders are placed outdoors, the feed may get wet when it rains and if left for extended periods could pose health risks to the ducks. Over exposure to sunlight can also affect the vitamin content in the feed so that it is advisable to place it in a covered area. Because of their susceptibility to mycotoxins, ducks should never be fed old or mouldy feed. Feeders should be emptied, cleaned and feed replaced on a daily basis.Compared to chickens, ducks eat a lot during a single feeding, as a result of their welldeveloped oesophagus, which compensates for the absence of a crop. This however could result in birds choking if they do not have easy access to drinking water when eating, which also should be clean and cool. Because of their drinking habits, water spillage from drinkers is quite common, which means that these should be so designed to enable the ducks to easily submerge the tip of the bill in them. Spillage can be minimised by correctly adjusting the water level in the drinkers, and placing drinkers at the appropriate height. Where ducks are reared on deep litter, it is advisable to place the drinkers on wire grids. Nipple drinkers can also be used to help reduce wet litter problems. Where these are used however, they should be checked regularly to ensure that they are all functional.In ducks, niacin deficiency can be recognised by bowlegs, curled toes and swollen knees. Treatment includes the use of a vitamin supplement rich in niacin. Vitamin D and calcium deficiencies lead to lameness, thereby preventing affected birds from accessing feeders and drinkers, leading to a decrease in feed intake. A vitamin supplement rich in vitamin D 3 can be used to correct this problem. The main symptoms of a vitamin E deficiency are ducks falling on their side and paddle, twisted neck. Cannibalism may be caused by imbalances in certain nutrients, such as methionine, along with overcrowding in pens. Where this occurs, affected ducks should be immediately removed and isolated. To prevent cannibalism, the beaks of Muscovy and Mule ducks should be trimmed at two weeks of age.Small Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and DucksDucks can be reared under a number of different production systems, either as a single enterprise or in combination with other livestock, including fish. However, in most commercial farms ducks are reared as a single enterprise. Ducks use water for swimming, wading and mating, but the provision of water for these activities is not absolutely necessary for successful duck production. However, when water is available, it enables the ducks to dissipate an appreciable amount of heat into water via their feet and bills, which aids in reducing heat stress. The type of production system and housing depend on a number of factors such as availability of credit, labour, technology and also the market requirements. The three main systems used for duck production include:• Intensive system in which ducks are totally confined• Semi-intensive system in which ducks are partially confined• Extensive system in which ducks are reared on large hectaragesThe two most widely used systems on commercial farms are the intensive (Figure 3.12A and 3.12B) and semi-intensive systems (Figure 3.12C and 3.12D), which to varying extents involve a restriction in the floor space provided for the ducks. Careful attention is also paid to the provision of a high quality, nutritionally balanced diet, in order to attain efficient feed conversion, rapid growth rate and the maintenance of a profitable enterprise. The genetic quality of the stock, as previously mentioned, as well as the health maintenance programme is also important areas of focus. In the extensive system, management of these parameters is not as rigid. Ducks are also kept in integrated systems (Figure 3.13) e.g. in combination with aquaculture or with crop such as rice, commonly seen in Asia. There is also the subsistence or backyard system of production, where ducks are kept mainly for household use and are fed household scraps and sometimes allowed to forage (Figure 3.14).Many different housing designs are used in both the intensive and semi-intensive systems. Ducks may be housed either directly on a dirt floor or on litter material. Deep litter floors are preferred compared to dirt floors because the ducks are much cleaner and the environment is generally much better for the animals' welfare. They may also be housed in cages with slatted or wire floor. Each of these floor systems has its associated advantages and disadvantages. For example, while the dirt and litter floors are cheaper to establish, they are more difficult to clean and puddles of dirty water can develop. The ducks are also in direct contact with their droppings in this system. Such floors therefore represent potential sources for the spread of diseases within the flock. Slatted and wire floors on the other hand are more expensive to establish but provide additional benefits, including higher stocking densities, cleaner ducks, and reduced risk of disease transmission due to direct contact with droppings.The intensive and semi-intensive systems have similarities. They both provide some covered area for the ducks, especially for laying and brooding. They also allow for separation by age or stage of production, whereby for example, the breeders can be separated from those ducks being fattened for market. This is particularly important if the sale of live animal takes place on-farm, as buyers generally want to purchase the larger ducks which are normally the breeders. This practice could however eventually has a negative impact on the quality of the breeding stock, since a number of associated parameters such as growth rate and market weight are influenced by the genetic quality of the breeding stock.Ducks for use as breeding stock should be healthy and alert, have good body conformation e.g. be full breasted, have a deep keel and with good width between their legs, and have attained the required weight for age for the given breeds. A major objective of the breeding unit is the production of fertile eggs with high hatchability, but its ultimate objective is to produce healthy ducklings to be reared to give high carcass yield and quality.Once selected as breeding stock the ducks should be fed with this objective in mind, but not be allowed to become too fat. If the ducks become too fat, this negatively impacts the level of egg production, while in drakes, their ability to mate is affected, something which in turn, affects the hatchability of the eggs produced. The feeding programme and general nutrition of breeders must therefore be carefully monitored in order to maintain this delicate balance.A key factor in the achievement of the objective of a breeding unit is the provision of the correct ratio of ducks to drakes, with a range of 5-8 ducks to one drake being usually sufficient. Breeder ducks in intensive and semi intensive systems, as well as in the extensive or backyard systems may be kept for four to five years. Oftentimes, when younger drakesSmall Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks are mated to older ducks in their first breeding season, because of sexual immaturity egg fertility may be affected, so that egg fertility in the flock should be regularly monitored. As such it is therefore advisable to use older males with older females and younger males with females of their own age.While ducks may start to lay at 23-28 weeks of age, in a well-managed flock laying can start at 21 weeks. Drakes used for breeding should be at least 27 weeks old. Similar to commercial layers, egg production in ducks could be stimulated by the use of a proper lighting programme, which involves increasing the number of light hours to around 14, approximately three weeks before the onset of laying. During the laying period, light hours should be maintained at about 16 hours. The increase in feed quality and quantity will also bring ducks into lay, and the ration should be changed from one used to support maintenance, to one for breeders. Egg production usually peaks about five to six weeks after the onset of lay, and in most cases if properly managed, is maintained around 50 percent for about five months. Unlike layer chickens, ducks do not like to perch. Therefore nest boxes should be placed at ground level.The provision of adequate nest boxes for breeders is important. A ratio of one nest box for every three ducks is recommended. Nest boxes should be about 35 cm wide x 43 cm deep x 33 cm high) and must allow only one duck to enter and sit. In order to minimise the number of dirty eggs, the nest boxes should be placed in the pens about one to two weeks before the onset of lay, thereby allowing soon to be laying ducks to become familiar with them. A layer of about 10 cm of clean, dry litter should be maintained in the nest boxes at all times. Droppings from the ducks should not be allowed to build up in and/or on the nest boxes, which should be located in a sheltered and isolated area to minimise disturbance, especially during brooding.It is possible to produce fertile eggs and have a poor hatch, as factors other than fertility, also impact on hatchability, for example, egg collection, storage and handling. Every effort should therefore be made to produce clean eggs and store them properly. Provision of an adequate number of nest boxes, proper nest box management, frequent collection of eggs, proper cleaning of any dirty eggs, reduced length of storage and proper storage conditions for fertile eggs all help to improve hatchability. Frequent egg collection also minimises soiled and cracked eggs. Proper egg storage is important to ensure that fresh, vigorous embryos are placed in the incubator or under the broody duck. If eggs are to be stored for more than two weeks they should be turned at least three times per day to avoid the yolk sticking to the shell. Eggs should be stored at 13°C, a relative humidity of 75 percent, and with the small end downward.The conditions during incubation impact directly on the percentage hatchability, when artificial incubation is used. It is critical that the manufacturer's guidelines be followed in relation to the maintenance of the correct temperature and relative humidity, regular turning of the eggs, and their timely removal from the incubator to the setter. Most commercial incubators automatically regulate the temperature, humidity and turning of the eggs and are also designed to alert the operator if the equipment malfunctions. Nevertheless, continuous monitoring of the equipment remains critical to the success of the hatch.Not all fertilised eggs develop into ducklings, as some embyos may die right after fertilisation, while others die during various stages of incubation. Candling will help to determine whether there is a fertility or hatchability problem. The best time to candle is between the 17th and 18th day of incubation. With Muscovy ducks candling can be done on the seventh day, and again on the 32nd day of incubation, while for Pekin and other breeds, this can be performed on the seventh and 18th days. When candling, a light is shone through the egg so that the interior of the egg can be observed through the shell. Eggs that appear clean with no signs of embryonic development are called 'clears'. Because some eggs may have been fertilised but the embryos may have died too early to be detected by candling, they will have to be examined ('break-out') for evidence of embryonic development. If 15-20 percent of the clear eggs are \"broken out\" and show no sign of embryonic growth, the problem is fertility. While a dead embryo will generally show as a dark spot stuck to the shell membrane, a live one will be located near the air space as a dark spot with blood vessels radiating away from it.Hatchability: the percentage of fertilised eggs that hatch into ducklings.Small Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and DucksMany small farmers use broody ducks to hatch their eggs, so that for these farmers, the brooding tendency is very important. Since the duck usually becomes broody after she lays a clutch of eggs, she can be allowed to sit on her eggs in a nest box in a relatively undisturbed area. She will leave the nest box for food and water, and should have easy access to both. The brooding tendency is therefore an important aspect of the duck's mothering ability, and in this regard, the Muscovy is a much better mother than the Pekin duck, which would seldom sit on her eggs. Some farmers also use broody hens (chickens) to incubate duck eggs.If chickens are used it may be necessary to sprinkle the eggs daily with lukewarm water to achieve a higher humidity. The incubation period for the Muscovy is 35 days while Pekin eggs take 21 days to hatch. Brooding tendency is less of less importance to large farmers who hatch their eggs using incubators, and whose main objective is to have the ducks lay as many eggs as possible without going broody. As such, these producers would prefer the Pekin.Broodiness: the natural tendency of the duck to set on her eggs until they hatch into ducklings.Duckling mortality impacts directly on the profitability of the farm, and should therefore be minimised by farmers as far as possible. A number of factors contribute to mortality levels, including brooding conditions, trampling of early-hatched ducklings by their mothers, feeding and nutrition, diseases and predators. It is advisable to remove early-hatched ducklings from their mother to reduce trampling and mortality of early-hatched ducklings, and also to encourage the mother to sit on the remaining eggs until they hatch.Brooding refers to the care and management of the newly hatched ducklings for the first few weeks, and can be done naturally. The duck huddles the ducklings under her to keep them warm, especially at nights, and protect them from danger. Broody hens (chickens) also do a good job, but they should be confined since the hens are likely to tire the ducklings by wandering too far. Wandering may also expose the young ducklings to predators.Artificial brooding conditions for ducklings are similar to those for brooding layer and broiler chickens and any type of equipment that is suitable for chickens is also appropriate for ducks. Brooding involves the provision of heat to keep the ducklings warm because their temperature control mechanism (i.e. thermoregulation system) is not fully developed, making them susceptible to chills. A 250-watt infrared brooding lamp, hung about 45 cm above the floor can be used in the brooder. If a hoover is used, it should be hung 10 cm to 13 cm higher than the height used for chickens. When infrared brooding lamps are not available, many farmers with small production systems use incandescent light bulbs for brooding. The following are some temperature recommendations for brooding ducklings: Week 1: 29.4°C -32.2°C Week 2: 23.9°C to 26.7°C Week 3 and beyond: 21°CIt is critical to monitor the ducklings during the first five days post hatch. If ducklings experience heat stress, they will spread out away from the heat source, pant and make a high pitch chirping noise. When they are too cold, ducklings will huddle under the heat source in groups, something that can result in crushing if they pile too high in the groups. It is important to observe the ducklings' response to the heat provided; an even distribution in the brooding area is a good indicator of their comfort.The brooding area should be dry, well-ventilated, draught-free, protected from predators and provide sufficient floor space for the rapidly growing ducklings. Wire or litter floors should be used during brooding. Wire is preferred because it reduces of the risk of aspergillosis associated with the use of some types of litter. Where litter material is used on the floor it should be about 10-15 cm deep. The litter should be treated for fungus, as this grows well on wet litter and ducklings are extremely susceptible to the aflatoxins produced by some fungi. The litter for young ducklings should therefore be kept dry at all times. Aflatoxins could cause high mortality and morbidity, and decreased growth rate of ducklings. In Trinidad and Tobago for example, the best brooding results have been obtained when specially built crates with rubberised or plastic coated wire mesh no more than 2 cm in diameter have been used for this purpose. The crates also provide the ducks with protection against predators such as dogs, cats and rodents, and also prevent aspergillosis since no litter is used.Small Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and DucksCare should be taken with the feeding of ducklings as mortality may result from starvation or from choking on dry feed. Starvation can arise when ducklings receive insufficient feed, are unable to access the feed provided, or if the feed particles are too big for the young duck to consume. If the ducklings do not have enough water to drink while eating the dry concentrate feed they may choke and die. Young ducklings should be fed a duck starter ration in the appropriate feeders, and must be provided with good quality (clean and cool) drinking water. During the first few days, the feed may be placed in flat feeders, which should not be placed on a smooth surface, as this could cause the young ducklings to slip and sustain leg injuries. Drinkers should be placed on wire grids to minimise wetting of the litter. Feeders and drinkers should be adjusted so that ducklings have easy access to them. Ducklings should be given fresh feed each day, and old or mouldy feed must never be fed. Drinkers should be located close to the feeders and should be washed and sanitised daily. The rinse water should not be poured in the house, but preferably into a bucket and removed from the pen to help maintain a clean healthy environment for the ducks. Drinkers and feeders should be checked daily to ensure that they are working properly.Food quality and human health issues have become more important in recent years, in addition to which, the concept of food value has changed. For example, high energy meat sources are less desirable because of excess calorie, and health concerns about total fat intake in the human diet. In the area of food safety, the primary concerns revolve around the food-borne illnesses caused by chemical contaminants and pathogenic bacteria. It is therefore important to keep ducks healthy at all times. A healthy and disease-free flock will provide good returns to farmers in the long run and a wholesome product to consumers. In order to achieve these objectives, farmers should have a disease-free farm, purchase disease-free ducklings, restrict the movement of visitors, disinfect all shed and utensils after every batch, and follow the advice of a veterinarian to prevent sickness and disease in the flock. The farm should be kept free of any materials that harbour vermin and insect pests. Biosecurity, as with all poultry, is of great importance on the duck farm and the key to maintaining a healthy flock (Box 3.3). Ducks raised in small numbers and in relative isolation, suffer little from diseases, but where there are large flocks, diseases may be extremely widespread. Muscovy and mule ducks appear to be resistant to many diseases common to Pekin and mallard-type ducks. The list of common diseases which follows is far from complete both in number and details, and should not be used as a substitute for accurate diagnosis and treatment by competent animal health personnel. Farmers should only administer antibiotics and vaccine when absolutely necessary or on the advice of animal health personnel. Failure to do this could result in the introduction of new pathogenic organisms into the environment.These are a group of toxic chemicals produced by moulds or fungi growing on certain feedstuff or litter material. Ducks are extremely susceptible to mycotoxins, especially aflatoxins, and this is therefore a major concern throughout the duck industry, especially in the humid tropics. Recognising this susceptibility and the potential for losses in the duck industry, good feed mill manufacturing practices will prevent the use of sub-optimal ingredients and duck rations are enhanced with both mould inhibitors and mycotoxins binders. Good management, storage and handling and timely usage of feed on theSmall Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks farm will also go a long way to minimise this problem. Aspergillosis, a fungal infection of the respiratory tract also referred to as brooders' pneumonia, is a common disease in ducks resulting from the inhalation of fungal spores in the air and by aflatoxins produced by fungi of the Aspergillus species, such as A. fumigatus and A. flavus. It is more common in ducklings reared on deep litter, especially on bagasse-based litter.Common signs include: reluctance to move, decreased feed intake, differential growth patterns in flock, ruffled feathers, whitish diarrhoea, difficult breathing or gasping, accelerated breathing, emaciation and death. Treatment of this condition is expensive and usually ineffective. Mortality from Aspergillosis can be quite high, especially in ducklings. Good litter management and a dry brooder house are absolutely essential to help prevent this disease.This disease is caused by the bacterium Clostridium botulism, an anaerobic spore forming organism, which grows in decaying plant and animal material particularly in hot humid climates. Stagnant pond water with decaying carcasses and vegetation are sources of the bacteria, which produces toxins that can cause botulism, and may result in high mortality in the flock. Ducks feeding on materials or drinking water containing the deadly toxins produced by the bacteria tend to lose control of their neck muscles and they usually drown if a swimming facility is available. The disease occurs both in young and adult stock. Common signs of botulism are weakness, paralysis of the neck muscles, and death, usually within 24 hours. The removal and/or isolation of birds from sources of contamination such as dead birds, is important in the control of this disease. Maintenance of clean facilities and the quality of the drinking water are very important in the prevention of this disease.Common signs include depression, septicaemia, navel infection, and some level of mortality within the first week of brooding, and ducklings also look and feel wet. Post mortem reveals the remains of a bluish or blackish yolk sac, something that is commonly observed in ducklings hatched from eggs on the floor or otherwise dirty eggs. While the infection may be caused by different bacteria, the Escherichia coli organism, which is normally associated with environmental hygiene, is the common causative agent associated with this disease. Prevention of this disease involves paying attention to good hygiene with respect to housing, nest box management, the hatchery and flock in general.Although not as troublesome as in chickens, this disease causes some measure of distress occasionally in flocks. The organism causing the disease in ducks is different from those causing it in chickens.External parasites are generally observed in ducks subjected to very poor management. They cause discomfort to the ducks along with varying levels of damage to the feathers.With careful examination, they can be seen at the base of the feathers, and in cases of heavy infestation, can be easily observed.While foraging, ducks may ingest undesirable foreign bodies such as nails and small pieces of wire. These items may puncture and cause damage to the internal organs.Affected animals may appear sick and post mortem examination generally reveals the extent of the injury. Similar items may also penetrate the duck's body and cause injury to the skin.Blisters -these usually occur on the footpads and breasts, and are usually caused by ammonia emanating from poorly managed deep litter. While the blisters on the footpads cause discomfort to the ducks and affect their access to feed and water, breast blisters affect carcass quality.Sticky eye -this is caused by dust or feed particles getting into the eyes of the duckling, resulting in around the eyes appearing wet and sticky. Providing the birds with containers of sanitised water to wash their bills assists in alleviating this problem.Duck cholera -this disease causes high mortality in adult and young stock, and can be controlled by strict sanitation.Duck virus enteritis (duck plague) -an acute fatal disease that affects ducks as well as geese, swans and other aquatic birds. It is caused by a filterable virus that is transmissible by contact, and commonly occurs where water is available for swimming.New duck disease (infectious serositis) -one of the most serious diseases affecting ducklings, caused by the bacterium Moraxella anatipestifer. Symptoms resemble those of chronic respiratory disease of chickens, and stricken ducklings fall over on their sides and backs.Small Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks Virus hepatitis -serious outbreaks of virus hepatitis can cause 80-90 percent mortality in flocks of ducklings. This highly contagious disease strikes swiftly and without warning and affects ducklings from one to five weeks of age. A vaccine, which can be administered to female breeding stock is available.Ducks are mainly marketed as whole birds in Trinidad and Tobago through pluck shops (cottage processors) or as live birds sold at the farm gate. Recently however, an increasing trend has been observed whereby local duck meat is cut up and sold in 'tray-paks' in supermarkets. Eight to ten hours prior to slaughter, feed should be withheld from the birds, but water may be provided up to the time of killing. Clean and un-crowded rearing, transportation and holding facilities will help to prevent bruising, cutting, stress and other factors that cause poor market acceptability. Ducks should be transported in crates or herded into a trailer-type transport, when the slaughtering facility is not done on farm. Construction of elaborate slaughtering facilities is justified only for large commercial operations. If live markets are not available, small farm flocks can be processed by using facilities similar to those used for chickens (i.e. pluck shops/cottage processing) (Figure 3.16).When slaughtering ducks, birds can either be hung by the feet, or placed in a special slaughtering funnel. Using a long, thin, sharp knife, a cut is made across the outside of the throat high up on the neck and just under the lower bill. This will sever the jugular vein and allow swift and complete bleeding. When bleeding has ceased, birds can be scalded by immersing them in hot water (60°C) for three minutes and de-feathered immediately after scalding. All remaining pinfeathers should also be removed by grasping them between the thumb and a dull knife and pulling sharply. Under local cottage processing it is common to flame off pinfeathers.In large commercial slaughterhouses, ducks are dipped in a molten wax after they have been de-feathered. The wax hardens when the birds are immersed in cold water, and the pin feathers are extracted when the wax coating is removed from the carcass. The wax can be reused if it is melted and the feathers are separated out. Small quantities of wax can be purchased for use in small slaughtering operations, however it is highly combustible and care must be taken to prevent it from coming in contact with open flames.After de-feathering, birds must be eviscerated immediately. The eviscerated carcass is then thoroughly washed, and placed in slush ice for rapid cooling, and the giblets placed in the body cavity of the chilled birds. If birds are to be marketed frozen, they should be packaged in shrinkable plastic bags (Figure 3.17). Protocols and standards are currently being developed for CARICOM with respect to cottage processing that cottage processors of ducks will have to adopt. Further, packaging and labelling requirements are also being developed for farmers' use.The three main purposes for keeping records are to: check on performance, guide future decisions, and provide planning data. Farmers must keep proper records if they are to effectively run a profitable duck enterprise, as flock production records are a necessary part of good flock management. Figure 3.18A represents a growing ducks record sheet, and provides a summary of flock behaviour from day old to market. Records on mortality and feed consumption are kept on a daily basis, but summarised on a weekly basis. Body weight of birds is monitored on a weekly basis, and this weekly weight can be plotted to give a visual analysis of how birds are performing, and can be compared with the expected performance based on the breeder's standard.Records should reveal the strengths of a business that can be exploited and the weaknesses that must be removed. It is therefore important for the duck producer to understand that this enterprise is not only a biological entity but a business and an economic entity. Thus, the cost of production and returns must also be a part of the recording systems, as illustrated in Figure 3.18B, which outlines the parameters to be considered in evaluating the cost of production of broiler ducks.Small Animal Production Systems: Rabbits and Ducks Marketing has historically provided women and their families with a source of income.CHAPTER ONE The identification and implementation of technologies and systems with the potential to increase agricultural production and productivity, have been the main strategies used to maximize the value of the vegetable sub-sector of the Caribbean. These strategies are seen as important to satisfy local demands for vegetables, decrease vegetable imports, which amounts to an average annual expenditure of US$265 Million in the Caribbean (Walters and Jones, 2012), and to increase food security. Protected agriculture is currently viewed as one such strategy, which can be used to profitably produce crops in the region. Jensen and Malter (1995) define protected agriculture (PA), as the modification of the natural environment to achieve optimum plant growth. It is viewed as a means of addressing the limitations of traditional open-field vegetable production systems, particularly low and inconsistent crop yields and productivity. PA employs technologies such as greenhouses (GH), rain shelters (RS) and net houses (NH), which primarily differ based on the type of protective material used, the size and complexity of the structure, and the degree to which the environment is manipulated or controlled. A greenhouse is a framed or inflated structure, covered by a transparent or translucent material that permits optimum light transmission for plant production and protects against adverse climatic conditions (Jensen and Malter 1995). By contrast, a rain shelter is a greenhouse-like unit, in which, only the roof is covered with a transparent or translucent material that is impervious to rain. It can either have no, or open sidewalls but has no mechanical ventilation or heating system. On the other hand, NH are greenhouse-like units, that are usually covered with insect proof netting that is pervious to rain. The net house may provide some degree of shading but does not normally consist of mechanical ventilation or heating systems.Regardless of the type of protective structure or the scale of commercial production, farmers are required to have a more comprehensive knowledge of agronomic and crop management principles than for traditional agriculture (Jensen and Malter 1995). Moreover, the success of any of these PA technologies is very much dependent on the level and quality of the applied technology, adequate research, and the provision of efficient technical support systems. The success of PA technologies is also dependent on factors such as local climate, marketing intelligence, and market access.In the Caribbean, such factors have either been limited or inadequately harmonized, resulting in several failed attempts at adopting PA technologies as a means of profitably producing vegetable crops. Such is the case with the recent re-introduction of greenhouse technology where farmers have not been able to achieve or sustain expected production, productivity, and profitability. This is mainly due to constraints, which have existed since the 1950s across reintroduction cycles of this technology. These include high greenhouse temperatures (>35°C) and relative humidity (> 90 percent), pest and disease management challenges, ineffective production systems, and plant growth media and nutrient management issues (St Martin and Brathwaite 2012a;St Martin et al. 2008). All of which often resulted in the abandonment of facilities after a few crop cycles.This raises the question of which crop production and/ PA technology is most appropriate and sustainable for use under the climatic conditions of the Caribbean. As is evident by the numerous structural modifications made to totally enclosed greenhouses by many farmers, including replacing plastic roof or sidewalls coverings with saran netting or 17-25 or lowermesh screens and producing in open-sided structures with plastic roof coverings, appropriate and sustainable PA technology is being intuitively defined as RS and/or NH. In fact, many novice greenhouse farmers are opting to establish, RS or NH instead of fully enclosedplastic roof covered GH. RS and NH are increasingly being viewed as more sustainable than greenhouse because they require a much lower initial capital investment, temperatures in these structures are generally lower than in GH, and if appropriately managed, yields and productivity are arguably higher than in GH or open field production.In light of this emerging trend, the objective of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of best management practices (BMPs) for sustainable production of vegetables in RS and NH. In contrast to the first volume of this book, focus is placed on the production of leafy vegetables, mainly lettuce, rather than tomato (St Martin and Brathwaite, 2012b). However, owing to similarities among protective structures, some of the principles and practices, which are described in detail in the first volume, have either been summarized into 'audit verification checklists', or not included. This is particularly so, for BMPs relating to site selection, RS/NH design and structure, and some cultural practices. These checklists provide a quick and practical means of evaluating the implementation of BMPs.Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable ProductionThe collation of information on recommended practices was done using the same methodology described by St Martin and Brathwaite (2012b). This included sourcing information from research done under the climatic conditions of the Caribbean, growers' and the author's experiences/ or on-site research, and RS/NH or GH manuals relevant to crop production in tropical and temperate conditions. All best practices and principles are rooted in, or linked to GLOBALG.A.P standards (GLOBALG.A.P 2011) and are addressed under the relevant subheadings. 'Rules of thumb', which were mainly adopted or modified from Talekar, Su, and Lin (2003) were used to highlight and summarize key points in this chapter.BMPs in this chapter will be related only to structural and cultural practices. BMPs for monitoring environmental factors, disaster preparedness, and business will not be discussed in this chapter since they are similar to those for GH production, which were thoroughly discussed in the first volume of this book. A first step to successful rain shelter or net-house vegetable production is a good location. Structures on higher lands are less likely to be flooded and have lower temperatures.Many of the rain shelter designs in the Caribbean have been developed \"on-farm\" by growers, mainly through modifications done to totally enclosed GH. As such, designs and sizes of RS vary, as do the materials used to construct these structures (Figures 4.1-4pages 106-7). In contrast, net-house designs are more standard than those for RH, and vary mainly with reference to the type and color of netting used, degree of shading provided, and the size of the structures.Orientation and light 9 RS or NH orientation is in any direction that allows for maximum airflow given that neither topography nor canopies do not shade the structure during sunrise and set and/or the orientation of RS or NH is not limited by plot size. 9 Vent openings of NH are oriented in the direction that the wind is coming from rather than against it.9 Mean daily temperatures are not above 35°C. 9 RS or NH are located in areas with cooler temperatures, which in the Caribbean, usually occur at elevations > 500m above sea level. 9 RS or NH structures are sited on soil that is well drained, particularly for crops that are to be cultivated directly in the soil.9 Soil is amended with organic materials such as mature compost as a cost effective strategy for improving the drainage and fertility of the soil. 9 In the case of soil-less production and in low-lying areas, RS or NH is built on elevated earthen pads that are at least 0.9 m larger than the structure in all directions, high enough to prevent excess rain water from flowing into the structure and with a gentle slope of 1-2 percent to the exterior to allow for good drainage.9 Soil-less cultivation systems and the establishment of the structure on a gravel base, 15cm to 30cm above grade are used where access to good quality soil is limited or not available.9 Water needs for RS or NH vegetable production were estimated and evaluated against water supply, access, price, and quality in the area, particularly in countries such as Jamaica, Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, and St. Kitts and Nevis, where the domestic water supply for the cultivation of crops may not be readily available year round, or the cost is prohibitive. RS or NH operation requires 8,000 liters of water per square meter (196 gallons per square feet) of growing space per year. 9 Water quality analyses were done and the analyses consisted of key variables such as pH (6.5-8.5), electrical conductivity (250-2000 µS/m), sodium content (20-60 percent), sodium adsorption ratio (3-10), E. coli (≤77 CFU/100ml), Enterococci (≤20 CFU/100ml), and faecal coliforms (≤200 CFU/100ml). 9 Potable water is used for irrigation, as river and well water are usually less ideal as they may contain pathogens and require filtration to remove silt and particulate matter that might clog irrigation systems. 9 If it is affordable, water used for farming is tested for pesticides, fuel oil, and other contaminants.Other site selection considerations. 9 Proximity to markets, access to labor and utilities, potential hazards and/or disasters such as land slippage, tall trees, flooding, hurricanes, and industrial pollution have been considered when siting RS/NH. 9 Space for future expansion of the operation as well as the social construct and norms of the neighbourhood where the structure will be established have also been considered. Source: St. Martin and Brathwaite (2012b), Chandra, Srivastava, and Maheshwari (1982), USAID (2008), Mirza (2008), Torres and Lopez (2010), Kumar, Tiwari, and Jha (2009), Chen, Shen, and Li (1982), St Martin et al. (2008) and Dey (2001) | 111Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable ProductionWith respect to the appropriate PA design structure for vegetable production under the climatic conditions of the Caribbean, rain shelter designs with opened sidewalls, definitely address to some extent, the issue of high mean daily temperatures (>35°C), which have been observed in totally enclosed greenhouse structures. However, this heat problem may persist in totally enclosed NH that are completely covered with insect-proof netting (50mesh) and have no vent system. Furthermore, over time, the transmission of sunlight is also significantly reduced due to the blockage of insect-proof netting by dust particles.Although temperatures are generally lower in opened-sided nethouse designs, these structures provide little or no protection against rains, which may limit vegetable production in the wet season. On the other hand, RS are impervious to rains; however do not limit the entry of pest and pathogens into the structure. Therefore, a more rigorous and/or demanding pest management system, similar to that used in open-field cultivation is needed. However, opened-sided RS or NH may limit the need for hand pollination in crops such as tomato, which may be high cost and time consuming. The substitution of lower size mesh netting (32-mesh) for insect-proof netting (50-mesh) in totally enclosed NH, may result in lower temperatures, while limiting the entry of several insect pests such as aphids and thrips.In light of these 'trade-offs' between types of protective structures and designs, it is recommended that the grower select structures that pose the lowest risk to the production of a specific crop and for which he/she has greater managerial strength. For example, in areas with high rainfall, and the vegetable crop selected for cultivation has a relatively short production cycle (e.g. lettuce) and no or few major pest or diseases, RS are recommended for use rather than NH. In contrast, in cooler areas, where rainfall is low to moderate, and the vegetable crop selected for cultivation has a relatively longer production cycle (e.g. tomato) and is susceptible to major pest or disease infestations, NH are recommended for use rather than RS.All protective structures, whether RS or NH, should be built to withstand strong winds in locations where severe storms occur. As a result, it is recommended that growers use galvanized iron pipes to construct the frame of these structures. Steel clips should also be used for fastening, where possible. Wood or bamboo should only be used for the construction of semi-permanent RS or NH.Two critical factors that must be considered when designing totally covered NH are:1. The choice of mesh size of netting, and 2. The design and location of two double doors to the structure Best-practices relating to these two factors and the issue of proper design and structure are detailed in the audit verification checklist provided in Box 4.2.Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable Production In this section, the focus is placed on the construction of a single-bed rain shelter with an arched roof (Figures 4.2), which is a simple and affordable design. This structure can be made into a net house by using nylon mesh for roof and side-coverings instead of plastic covering on the roof alone. The size of this structure can also be increased to accommodate more beds by incorporating centre posts and more reinforcements in the design (Figure 4.3). The following description of the construction of RS was adopted mainly from Palada, Roan and Black (2003).Components of RS or NH structures are classified as:• Structural -consisting of pillars, frames, pipes, and side braces (Figure 4.6).• Covering materials -comprising polyethylene film, polyvinyl chloride, polyolefine, or nylon netting.• Connecting and fastening accessories -consisting of fastening pins, hooks, clips, and plastic belts (Figure 4.6).The positions of the two corner posts should be firstly marked out at each end of the bed/area (i.e. four-corner posts in total) . Holes should be then dug and the posts buried at least 30 cm deep . For a more permanent and secure structure, the grower may opt to dig a hole 15cm wide x 15cm long x 40cm deep, split (18-25 cm) then bend end sections of the corner posts and set them in concrete, ensuring that the corner posts are at the same height and level . The rest of the foundation posts should be equally spaced (approximately 70cm apart), starting from the corner posts, and buried at least 30 cm deep.The arch tops are connected to the foot pipes (foundation posts) by inserting both ends at 5 cm to the pointed end of the foot pipe post . Steel clips should be used to attach horizontal and diagonal side pipes to the structure to reinforce the sides (Box 4.3 -Steps 2A, B and D), and the centre top pipe installed into the arch top .The UV polyethylene film cover should be carefully cut to fit the arched top roof. To adequately fit a RS with a single bed measuring 5m long (Figure 4.2), a sheet of polyethylene film measuring 5.3 m long x 3.75 m wide is required. Half-inch (1.30 cm) polyethylene plastic clips should be used to attach the film covering to the arch and side brace galvanized iron pipes (Box 4.3-Step 3).The plastic covering on the side horizontal pipes and upright post can be reinforced using steel clips. Plastic wire belts should be run across the top of the plastic sheet and fastened to upright posts to reinforce the covering against strong winds (Box 4.3-Step 4).The use of side-coverings is recommended only if there is a major insect pest problem and to prevent rain from blowing in. In cases, where white-fly transmitted viruses are problematic, and the RS are located at high elevations (>500m above sea level) in a cool environment, a 60-mesh nylon netting is recommended as a side covering. At lower elevations, 32-mesh nylon netting is recommended. The nylon mesh netting should be cut at least six to eight percent longer than the length and height of the side wall to ensure that enough material is present for fastening and securing. For example, for the RS in This section on cultural BMPs will focus on crop and variety selection, nutrient requirements, pest, disease, harvest, and post-harvest management. Water management and weed control are also categorized under cultural practices. These topics will however not be discussed in this chapter because there is little variation in water management and weed control principles and practices in tomato production compared with that of lettuce under protective structures. 1The selection of the type of vegetable crops and crop varieties to be cultivated is one of the most important decisions to be made in crop production using RS or NH. Market demand and prices and cost of production are the primary factors which should be considered when selecting leafy vegetables for net-house production. However, growers must also choose leafy vegetables and varieties that are high yielding and most appropriate for the production system employed. Whenever possible, high quality, hybrid seeds from reputable, seed companies, which are bred for greenhouse conditions with heat tolerant characteristics and resistance to multiple common diseases e.g. bacterial leaf spots, bottom rot, and crown and head rots are desired. Information on disease resistance properties can often be found on the label of the seed container. However, growers should be aware that 'resistance' labelling does not indicate that a crop will be completely immune to a disease and/or pest. Therefore, selecting a crop variety with high resistance to diseases is no substitute for a good crop rotation system that consists of leafy vegetables from diverse families (i.e. crucifers and non-crucifers) Figure 4.8.Such a crop rotation system, which is based on the rotation of crucifers such as Chinese cabbage and pak-choi with non-crucifers e.g. lettuce and amaranthus, will assist in minimizing insect and pest damage, and maximize crop performance. This is particularly so for crucifers, where cultivation of these crops season after season in the same substrate leads to poor crop growth and low yield due to the accumulation of undesirable crucifer root exudates (Talekar, Su and Lin 2003). If market demand requires a farmer to grow crucifers continuously, it is suggested that the net-houses be divided into two; one half is planted to crucifers and the other to non-crucifers in each crop cycle (Talekar, Su and Lin 2003). During succeeding crop cycles, the crop should be rotated, and non-crucifers planted 1.For an extensive discussion on BMPs on water management and weed control, it is recommended that the reader consult St. Martin and Brathwaite (2012b).| 117Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable Production over the half of the net-houses that was planted with crucifers in the immediate preceding season and vice versa (Talekar, Su and Lin 2003). Hybrid varieties generally produce stable higher yields with greater uniformity of size, compactness, and yield than inbred varieties (Singh, Dasgupta and Tripathi 2005). Varieties bred to limit physiological problems such as bolting (or, the shooting of sled stalks occurs) and tipburn should also be selected for production in these protected structures. Besides the high cost, the major drawback of hybrid seed is that saved seeds will not produce a 'true to type' plant in the next growing cycle. This means new seeds must be purchased for each season, which will most likely increase production costs.Rotate the crop and your plants will remain tip-top.For lettuce production, growers should be familiar with the climatic requirements for different lettuce types such as leafy, head, romaine, or specialty types, which may be red or red and green. For example, some head type lettuce such as iceberg or crisphead, require rather exacting temperatures (10-20°C) to form compact good quality heads (Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 1996). The formation of heads is limited at 20-27°C. Cool nights are also necessary for good quality head type lettuce, as with high night temperatures, lettuce tends to become bitter. Tip burning also occurs at high temperatures. For these reasons, head type lettuce is recommended for cultivation in NH at high elevations (150 -900m above sea level) or in areas with cooler temperatures. In contrast, leafy (Minetto) and semi-head (Green Mignonette) lettuce may be grown year-round at lower elevations (Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 1996). Cultivars of lettuce that are commonly grown in the Caribbean include Minetto, Mignonette Trini Star, Trinity, and Tropical Emperor. Growers are encouraged to continually search for and test new varieties that provide the best possible advantage in terms of environmental conditions and profitability of the enterprise.Table 4.1 provides a summary of the key physical and chemical properties, which must be considered when selecting soilless substrates for the production of leafy vegetables. Net-house vegetable production is commonly done in soil-less substrates whereas in RS, production is mainly done in the soil. As it pertains to production in soil, lettuce yield and quality tends to be highest in well-drained, slightly acid to neutral soils (pH 5.5-7) with high organic matter content.Irrespective of the type of substrate used i.e. soil or soilless, key physical and chemical properties must be assessed before a final decision on a substrate is made. This is important since these properties affect the ability of the growth substrate to effectively perform its basic functions. This not only includes providing the appropriate root environment, plant support and supply of nutrients, but also facilitating water delivery to the crop. A checklist of factors that must be considered when selecting plant growth substrates and recommended practices for managing growth substrates are provided in Boxes 4.4-4.7. 50-80 percent 10-30 percent 45-65 percent 25-35 percent 0.19-0.70g/cm 3 5-6.0 0.2-1.5 dS/m i. Physical and chemical properties of soilless substrate listed in the table are after irrigation and drainage, done on a percent volume basis. ii. For seedling production the ideal electrical conductivity of the substrate is at a lower range of 0.2-0.5 dS/m (Yeager et al., 2007).Source : Maronek, Studebaker, and Oberly (1985) | 119Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable ProductionCost effective substrates that are preferably locally available in large quantities, renewable, possess good physical, chemical and if possible, disease suppressive properties are selected for crop cultivation.The inherent fertility of soil-less media has not been considered as a primary factor in selecting an appropriate substrate for crop growth, since fertilizer management plans are designed to supply all the nutrients needed by the crop during the production cycle. Soils usually do not provide optimal aeration and drainage required to maximize crop performance and usually need to be disinfected to prevent the build-up of soil-borne disease, insects, and weed seeds.In the event where the use of soil-less media is cost prohibitive, soil that has been amended with well-matured compost, solarized or steam treated is used for crop cultivation. Raised beds have been established for the cultivation of leafy vegetable crops.Ready mix commercial substrates such as PRO-MIX® are used for seedling production, particularly for new vegetable producers.Growers experiment with compost mixes made from locally available material as possible alternatives to peat moss based substrates.Raw bagasse and sawdust or coconut coir that have not been retted (leached), are not used as components of or as substrates as they contain phytotoxic compounds such as phenolics and also immobilize nitrogen.Composted rather than uncomposted coconut coir is used as container substrate for soilless cultivation of leafy vegetable crops, particularly by new growers.Raw or composted coconut coir that has been pre-soaked and leached (retting) over 48 hours is used for crop cultivation unless the raw material has disease suppressive properties, which may be lost through this process.Source: St Martin and Brathwaite (2012b), Ma and Nichols (2004) and Handreck (1992) Box 4.5: Audit verification checklist for disinfecting growth substrates Chemical methods are not used for the sterilization of growth substrates since the most effective chemicals are highly toxic to humans and animals and have negative effects on the environment. Solarization and steam pasteurization are used for sterilizing substrates. Solarization is used for sterilization, if capital is limited and there is a lag of at least a month or two between the end of one crop cycle and the beginning of another.To increase the efficiency of solarization, two layers of polyethylene, separated by fillers (i.e., PVC pipes) spaced every few feet are used to create an air space. Though faster than solarization, steam pasteurization may be cost prohibitive to producers because it requires investment in equipment and materials such as steamers and thermometers. The steaming process has been done for at least 30 -45 minutes, during which time the substrate has been exposed to steam at approximately 100°C. Temperature has been monitored during the process to ensure that uniform heating is achieved and that all sections reach at least 82°C. Substrates have not been over-steamed since this may have killed disease suppressive microbes and may cause the release of toxic substances. Substrates that have had slow-release fertilizer blended into it have not been steam pasteurized.Source: Sethuraman and Naidu (2008) and Robbins and Evans (2011) Adjustments of the pH of media are made when the values are outside the optimum range recommended for the production of leafy vegetable crops. pH most often needs to be raised rather than lowered. Calcitic (CaCO3) or dolomitic limestone (mixture of CaCO3 and MgCO3) in the form of fine powder or pelletized granules have been incorporated into substrates prior to planting, to increase pH. Fine powders calcitic or dolomitic limestone, which are faster acting than coarser prills (pellets), have been thoroughly mixed with media used, as they tend to settle and leach out of the bottom of the pot/container. The amount of lime required has been determined based on the starting and desired pH, the particle size of the limestone (small particles are faster acting than large ones), the type of media and the alkalinity of irrigation water used. Lime rate recommendations generally range fromRain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable Production Box 4.7: Audit verification checklist for managing electrical conductivity of substrate 9 A consistent electrical conductivity value of > 3.0 dS/m before and after the application of fertilizer is a cause for serious concern as it may negatively affect crop performance. 9 To address the problem of high EC, growers have first determined the source of or practices resulting in elevated salt accumulation. If possible, the grower has reduced or eliminated the source of elevated salts, which is usually from irrigation water, the amount or type of fertilizer used, or the media. 9 Manures and compost (immature and mature) usually have high EC levels; therefore they may have to be substituted for peat moss at a rate of 20-40 percent by volume for a growth substrate mix. 9 High EC levels are being managed by keeping the percentage of water that leaves a container relative to what is applied (leaching fraction) at 20 to 30 percent and not allowing pots to dry out. 9 Substrates are not kept too wet as this may lead to the development of secondary problems such root and stem rot.Source: Ayers and Westcot (1985), Robbins and Evans (2011) The grower should prepare the land under the RS/NH by tilling with a tractor or hand tiller. It is recommended that the grower construct raised beds of approximately 30 cm high and 1.5 m wide and at least 2.4 m long (Palada, Roan and Black 2003). Longer beds, extending almost the full length of the RS/NH may be constructed if production is being done on well-drained soil. Hand hoes should be used to straighten the beds before applying basal fertilizer. The use of silver or black plastic mulch (0.01-0.04 mm thick) is recommended as an effective means of weed suppression, retaining soil moisture, moderating soil temperature, and deterring some pests. Plastic mulch should be rolled over the bed and the side edges of the plastic secured by throwing soil on both sides of the bed (Figure 4.9). Drains approximately 0.45-0.6 m wide between beds and running the length of the RS/ NH should be constructed between raised beds.To assure a uniform and proper stand establishment, it is recommended that most leafy vegetable crops including lettuce, should be transplanted rather than direct seeded. The amount of seed required for transplanting lettuce is usually lower than that needed for direct seeding. For example, for head lettuce approximately 85-170g of seeds are required for cultivating an acre (210-420g/ha), compared to 454g/acre (1122g/ha) for direct seeding.For leafy types, approximately 57-142g/acre (141-351g/ha) is required for transplanting compared to 907-1,360g/acre (2240g-3359g/ha) for direct seeding. Apart from requiring less seeds for cultivation, transplanting lettuce also has the advantage of easier weed control, less damage due to birds, and higher water, land and fertilizer use efficiency since the plants are in the RS/NH production system for a shorter period.Growers should be aware that lettuce seeds germinate best at 15-20°C, and will fail to germinate at > 27°C, if they are not primed to overcome thermo-dormancy (Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 1996). Therefore, for year-round cultivation particularly at low elevations, growers should purchase primed lettuce seeds from a reputable seed company. High quality seed generally emerges three to five days after sowing. Except when planting, lettuce seeds should be refrigerated at all times as they quickly lose viability when exposed to high temperatures and humidity. Open-pollinated seed requires a dry storage period prior to sowing.Slow release starter fertilizers can be incorporated in the substrate before trays or containers are uniformly filled with the seedling starter substrate. If a slow release fertilizer was not incorporated in the media, seedlings should be fertigated once at the two true-leaf stage with 6 grams of an 8-32-8 homogeneous fertilizer per litre of growing media, plus 200 ppm of a 13-24-24 plus micronutrients foliar fertilizer applied in the irrigation water. Growers may also apply suitable commercial fertilizer at a rate and time as guided by the label and other factors such as properties of media and the crop type. Growers should ensure that the seedlings are not excessively fertilized, particularly with nitrogen, which will result in soft-tissued seedlings. On the other hand, under fertilization will result in nutrient deficient seedlings.As a general rule, vegetable crop species should be ready to be transplanted at the four to five true leaf stage, which usually occurs four to six weeks after sowing. However, for cultivation in raised beds under RS/NH, transplanting of lettuce can be done as early as two to four weeks after sowing. For novice growers, it is recommended that head type lettuce transplants be spaced at 38-45 cm between rows and 30-38 cm between plants and semihead types, 20-30 cm between rows and plants. For leafy type lettuce, 38-45 cm between rows and 25-30 cm between plants should be used. These spacings usually result in three to four rows per bed. For production in soilless substrates, transplanting can be done earlier at one to three weeks after sowing depending on the sturdiness and health of the seedlings. Transplants should be cultivated at a planting density of two seedlings/0.1m 2 . The time from transplanting to harvest ranges from four to seven weeks depending on the variety and type of lettuce. Audit verification checklists for propagation, transplanting, and spacing practices are presented in Boxes 4.8 and 4.9.Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable ProductionAll propagation is done in an appropriate sheltered structure separate from the RS/NH, where production will take place.For ergonomic reasons and to improve productivity, all propagation is done on benches and/or tables that are at least 1m high with solid netted or meshed surfaces consisting of apertures approximately 2 to 3 cm 2 .All tools, supplies including new seedling trays as well as the propagation area have been disinfected following the instructions on the label of a suitable sanitizer, such as bleach.A contingency 3-10 percent has been factored into the equation when calculating the number of seeds needed per area. This is done to allocate for losses due to pest and diseases.Seeds have been placed in the centre of the cell containing growth media, and lightly covered with the substrate.Seeds have been sown at a depth of approximately 2.5 times the average length of the seed. Seedlings have been very gently watered until water drops are seen coming from the holes in the bottom of the germination tray.Germination trays have been wrapped completely with a black plastic (germination chamber) and placed in a cool area.Seedlings have been regularly monitored (at least 3 times/ day) to avoid etiolation. Germination trays were unwrapped as soon as the first seed germinates. Seedlings were kept in an area with optimum conditions (11-16 klx and a temperature of 24-29˚C).Source: St Martin and Brathwaite (2012b), USAID ( 2008), Smith and Lopes (2010) and Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho. (1996) Box 4.9: Audit verification checklist for transplanting and plant spacing in a containerized-production systemPreparations for transplanting started at least 12 hours before seedlings are removed from seedling trays. Irrigation systems were made operational and plant containers appropriately arranged, spaced, and filled with growth substrate.Growth substrates were pre-moistened before receiving transplants. Seedlings were transplanted in the late afternoon when it is not very hot (24-29°C) so that they can adjust to temperature and substrates changes overnight.Growth substrates were firmly pressed around the root of the transplant, and then lightly irrigated after transplanting.Since light is generally not a limiting factor to vegetable production in RS/NH in the Caribbean, selection of plant density was primarily based on the potential effect on ventilation rates on crop performance and the resources available to produce the crop.The experienced growers has decided to adhere to, or further adjust transplant spacing to the production systems and planned economic goals.Caution was taken to avoid overcrowding as it will result in decreased yield per plant and also tends to promote disease development due to high relative humidity and the inability of pesticides to easily penetrate the thick foliage.Source: St Martin and Brathwaite (2012b) USAID ( 2008) and Hanson et al.(2000) Plant uniformity starts in the germination tray.To effectively employ BMPs for nutrient management, growers must be knowledgeable about the nutrient requirements and growth pattern of the crop cultivated. A good starting point is to obtain information on the amount of nutrients that a crop removes from a growth medium (Table 4.2). Such information can be used to estimate crop nutrient requirements, and develop an appropriate fertilizer programme (St Martin and Brathwaite 2012b). The focus of this integrated nutrient management programme will be to:• match fertilizer application with the nutrient requirements of the plant across growth stages;• limit the loss of nutrients from plant containers to rain shelter or net-house floors during top-watering or from the soil; and• limit nutrient and water loss from irrigation and leaching by containing the effluent. | 125Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable ProductionThe fertilizer programme developed should take into account: fertiliser type, application method, fertilization rate and frequency, volume of fertiliser solution, leaching fraction, plant growth rate, and environmental conditions. An audit verification checklist for nutrient management is presented in Box 4.10.Growers should pay particular attention to phosphorus availability since it has been shown to account for the single largest variation in lettuce yield production among various substrate types (Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 2003). Moreover, substrates deficient in phosphorus may result in increased bacterial infection rates in lettuce, and in some cases, harvest delays by several weeks compared to well fertilized plants (Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 1996). The only symptom of a P deficiency in lettuce is stunted growth, and not the reddish pigmentation and leaf 'feathering', which are characteristic of phosphorus deficiency in other vegetables crops.Growers should also ensure that adequate levels of nitrogen are available in the substrate for plant uptake since nitrogen levels are associated with the formation of solid heads, as well as size, colour and earliness of maturity in lettuce (Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 1996). Nitrogen deficiency in lettuce appears lighter green and often results in delayed harvest and/or in failure of heads to achieve marketable size and quality. Growers should be aware that while corrective nitrogen applications are effective during the early vegetative stages of the crop, they often result in a 3-10 days delayed harvest (Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 1996). However, corrective nitrogen applications made during the head-formation stage will not result in increased head size or final yields.The recommended approach for pest and disease management is the formulation of an integrated pest management (IPM) programme, which includes crop, pest and disease identification and monitoring, the use of resistant cultivars, sanitation, and appropriate cultural, chemical and biological control strategies (Smith and Lopes 2010;St Martin and Brathwaite 2012b). A summary of the key points for the respective components of this programme is presented in Boxes 4.11-13 and the key disorders and diseases of lettuce in the Caribbean are discussed. Important pests of lettuce include caterpillars, aphids, leaf miners, leafhoppers, mites, thrips, and whiteflies. These pests can be successfully managed using most of the strategies and protocols described for disease control in Boxes 4.11-13.Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable ProductionInformation on the major diseases that affect the crop, particularly in the area where the RS/ NH are established, was obtained before cultivating the crop.The assistance of suitably trained personnel to help design and implement an effective IPM programme was solicited.The IPM programme consists of a monitoring or scouting plan, which should form the basis of IPM decision making, regardless of the control strategies used.A scouting plan consists of a pre-crop site evaluation, inspection of incoming plants, the use of sticky cards and indicator plants.The pre-crop site evaluation was done at least 4-6 weeks prior to the introduction of a new crop or at the beginning of another cropping cycle.An evaluation of the surroundings of the RS or NH extending at least 8 m from the structure, was done by collecting information such as, types of weeds, crops growing in the field, soil type and drainage problems and methods used to control pests.One-third to all the plants were thoroughly examined for signs of insect and disease before being introduced into the RS or NH, or not more than 48 hours after they have been introduced into the RS/NH. This examination was done before the plants were transfered to the main growing space in the RS or NH, or in a separate receiving shelter.Once the crop has been established, numbered yellow sticky cards were spaced equally throughout the RS or NH in a grid pattern at the minimum recommended rate of 90 m 2 . These cards are used to monitor infestations of adult flying insects.The cards were also placed near all entryways and vents. They were replaced weekly unless the level of infestation is so high as to demand an earlier removal. Threshold levels for particular crops are being developed with the assistance of suitably trained personnel, using data collected from these cards, such as the number and type of pest and beneficial insects. A scouting unit is not > 370m 2 . Large RS or NH can be divided into several scouting units of ≤ 370m 2 . Diseases are being monitored using similar inspection systems, record keeping and a selected decision-making process.Every attempt has been made to accurately identify diseases so that appropriate treatment or action can be taken. This has been done using diagnostic laboratory services or specialized consultancy services.Source: St Martin and Brathwaite (2012b), Smith and Lopes (2010).| 129Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable Production Box 4.13: Audit verification checklist for cultural and chemical practicesCrop barriers and trap crops such as corn outside the RS or NH are established.Repellent or companion crops such as marigold, chive, and rosemary are established in and around the RS or NH.Well-drained substrates are used to prevent root diseases.Appropriate plant spacing is used to allow for good air movement, lower humidity levels, and better pesticide coverage.Irrigation is appropriately done to prevent puddling or excess water on the floor.Irrigation is done early in the day to allow foliage to remain dry overnight.Chemical pesticides are used as the last resort for the control of pests.'Green chemicals' such as bio-pesticides and bio-fungicides are used in RS or NH, on a disease preventive basis.Fungicides are only applied on a preventive basis to valuable crops when conditions are favorable for the development of a prevalent disease.A broad-spectrum fungicide is used on a preventive basis to control root diseases.For foliar diseases, pesticides are applied when the disease is first evident.For effective foliar disease control, foliage is thoroughly covered with pesticide.To prevent or minimize the development of resistance by the pest, pesticides with different modes of action, chemical groups e.g., systemic/contact fungicides are used.All Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) related to pesticide use, handling, storage, and disposal are employed when dealing with chemical pesticides.Copper-based pesticides approved for use in RS/NH are used to control bacteria and most fungi.Diseased plants are removed or isolated from healthy plants.Viral diseases are controlled by controlling the insect vector, removing the diseased plants from the RS/NH and burning them, eradicating host plants such as weeds, and starting with virus-free seeds or propagating materials. There are no effective chemicals for the control of plant viral diseases.Sterile growth substrate is used to prevent nematode problems.Botanicals such as neem-based products are used as a chemical strategy for nematode control.Growth substrates containing nematodes are not used for another cropping cycle.Source : Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho (1996), St Martin and Brathwaite (2012b) and Smith and Lopes (2010) Symptoms of russet spotting include small olive brown spots on the lower midribs of the outer leaves. The symptoms develop at least four days after exposure to excessive ethylene levels of 20-35 ppm at 2-15˚C, and are visible on both sides of the leaf (Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 1996). However, the inner leaf side is mostly affected and symptoms tend to be more severe on over-matured lettuce or lettuce produced in hot, dry areas. To reduce russet spotting, growers should maintain storage temperatures just above freezing, and ventilate properly. Harvested lettuce should also be kept away or separated from climacteric fruits e.g. bananas and pineapples, and other sources of ethylene or ethylene derivatives such as gasoline engines.When exposed to high temperatures and dry conditions lettuce tends to bolt or flower. Cultivars vary in their tendency to bolt. Therefore, premature bolting can be managed by selecting a variety that has a low tendency to bolt, cultivating lettuce in areas with cooler temperatures, and by the use of best practices for water management.Initial symptoms include small translucent spots close to the leaf margins, which eventually result in darken lesions and death of leaf margin tissues. These spots and lesions, which arise due to localized calcium deficiency in the foliage, provide openings for secondary bacterial pathogens. Tipburn, which can be controlled to some extent by planting tolerant cultivars, is particularly severe under hot weather and fast growing conditions. Increasing soil calcium supply prior to planting, liming highly acid soils, foliar calcium sprays on leafytypes, slowing growth through lighter fertilizer application (particularly N), keeping the soil sufficiently moist, and shading with up to 35 percent shade cloth, are some strategies that can be used to manage tipburn (Koike and Davis 2014;Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 1996). For best results, growers should use a combination of these strategies and not rely only on one practice. The use of calcium sprays alone is often ineffective, especially on head lettuce, because calcium is inefficiently translocated to those leaf tissues deficient in calcium (Koike and Davis 2014). Head types are generally more susceptible to tipburn than leafy lettuce.Bottom rot is a fungal disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Early symptoms include slimy rotting of the lower leaves in contact with the soil and rust-coloured, sunken spotsRain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable Production on petioles and mid-ribs (Koike and Davis 2014). Eventually, the lesions expand, spread, become darker, and result in decay of the entire plant (Koike and Davis 2014). Control is difficult. However, it is recommended that the grower do the following, as suggested by Koike and Davis (2014): 1. Keep the foliage dry and the fertilizer level low so that foliage growth is not overly succulent.2. Plant on raised beds to improve drainage as bottom rot is more severe under moist and warm conditions.3. Avoid flooding as a means of controlling the disease.4. Rotate crops.5. Direct fungicide applications towards the base of the plants.6. Avoid disturbing the soil after application of protectant fungicides for bottom rot management.Bacterial leaf spot is caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. Vitians, a bacterium, which is highly dependent on wet, cool conditions for infection and disease development (Koike and Davis 2014). Early symptoms of bacterial leaf spot are small, water-soaked leaf spots on the older leaves of the plant (Koike and Davis 2014). These lesions, which are typically bordered by leaf veins and angular in shape, quickly turn black. This is a diagnostic character of the disease. To manage the disease, it is recommended that the grower do the following:1. Use pathogen-free seed.2. Avoid using sprinkler irrigation, whenever possible.3. Practise crop rotation.Destroy alternate hosts such as weeds.5. Use can be made of copper-based bactericides, but these are not very effective, and should be applied before infection occurs. Spreader-stickers should be used with bactericide treatment, particularly during rainy weather.This fungal disease is caused by Bremia lactucae, a complex organism consisting of multiple races (Koike and Davis 2014), which require damp, cool conditions and moisture on leaves to infect lettuce. Symptoms include light green to yellow angular spots on the upper surfaces of leaves, with white fluffy growth of the pathogen on the lower sides of these spots. Lesions eventually turn brown and dry up (Koike and Davis 2014). The pathogen can become systemic and cause dark discoloration of stem tissue. The grower should manage the disease by using resistant cultivars with fungicide (applied before the development of the disease), crop rotation, and sanitation.This bacterial disease, which is caused by Pseudomonas marginalis, usually occurs on over-mature heads, causes a diffused but distinct pink area at the midrib base (Koike and Davis 2014). The symptoms intensify during shipping and storage extending toward the leaf veins (Koike and Davis 2014). Growers can manage this disease by not harvesting and packaging over-matured lettuce, good sanitation practices, crop rotation, and providing optimal storage conditions.Harvest time for lettuce, which usually occurs four to seven weeks after transplanting, should be informed by consumer preferences, distance, and time needed to market the produce. Maturity is often judged according to the number and colour of leaves and/or by head development in semi-head and head type lettuce. For example, lettuce heads with <30 leaves before trimming are considered immature, whereas mature heads have approximately 35 leaves (Valenzuela, Kratky and Cho 1996). Nonetheless, both immature and mature lettuce generally have a better flavour and fewer post-harvest problems than over-mature heads, which tend to be bitter. Head-type lettuce with a very loose or easily compressible head is generally considered immature, whereas over-mature lettuce have very firm or hard heads (Kader, Lipton and Morris 1973). What is critical however, is that the grower should harvest the lettuce before the heads bolt, crack, yellow, or turn bitter. With improved cultivars and cultural practices, uniformity of the crop yields and quality have increased, therefore growers can harvest up to 90 percent of their crop in one harvest. In most cases, this has resulted in > 5 harvests per year, with an average yield of 3 kg/m 2 / crop (300 grams/sq. ft. crop).Lettuce should be harvested when leaves are bright to dark green, crisp and turgid and free from insects and decay, as consumers often perceive higher nutrient content and overall better quality in such leaves. Lettuce without discoloration at the butt and signs of mechanical damage are also perceived as fresh and safer to eat by consumers (Kader, Lipton and Morris 1973).Rain Shelters and Net-houses for Vegetable ProductionIn non-containerized-soil production systems, growers should cut the lettuce at soil surface, with a sharp, sterilized knife, leaving the roots in the soil. This minimises the removal and transportation of soil to unintended areas, which in turn significantly reduces the risk of spreading pathogens or pests to other fields. However, the land should be cleared of all plant debris immediately after harvest. This will reduce carryover of pests and diseases to subsequent crops.In containerized-soil-less production systems, lettuce should not be cut at the surface of the soil-less substrate since it is may be difficult and require additional labor and costs to remove or clear roots and other plant debris from each container. The root system can be cut off some time after the entire planted is uprooted from the substrate, usually before washing or cooling the lettuce.For head-type lettuce, the heads should be harvested leaving as many of the wrapper leaves uninjured as possible. That is, at least four to five wrapper leaves on each head of lettuce. To minimize wrapper leaf damage, lettuce should not be cut when the heads are wet. Before packing or immersing in water for cooling, growers should remove soiled and spoiled leaves at the base of the lettuce head. All lettuce heads showing traces of disease infection or any other disorder should be discarded.Lettuce is a perishable commodity, has a high respiration rate, is sensitive to ethylene, and is readily susceptible to damage due to wilting because of its high surface to volume ratio. Therefore, the key guidelines in maintaining post-harvest crop quality are:1. avoid mechanical injury such as those resulting from impact, puncture, compression, vibration, and abrasion;2. promptly and thoroughly cool lettuce;3. maintain the optimum storage temperature (0°C to 2°C) and relative humidity (95-100 percent) for lettuce; and 4. avoid water loss.Vacuum cooling is the recommended method for promptly cooling lettuce. However, in the Caribbean, where small-scale production vegetable systems are predominant, cold water (4-12°C) can be useful in pre-cooling lettuce. As such, in rain shelter or net-house systems, containers with potable cold water can be brought directly into the RS or NH and used by the harvester as a field container. Alternatively, large containers with potable cold water can be strategically located in RS and NH, at points which minimise the time between harvest and pre-cooling (preferably <20 minutes). The harvester should use clean water with each harvest of lettuce. Lettuce should be packed in stackable containers, which allow for maximum air circulation around pre-cooled lettuce, and reduce mechanical injury.At the recommended temperature of 0-2°C and relative humidity storage conditions of 95-100 percent, leaf type lettuce has an expected storage life of one to two weeks, and head-type lettuce two to three weeks. Harvesters and packers should avoid storing lettuce next to climacteric crops and in low CO 2 (< 5 percent) and O 2 (<1 percent). Under such conditions, lettuce tends to develop off-flavours and various disorders, including russet spotting and brown stain. An audit verification checklist for harvest and post-harvest is provided in Box 4.14.Keeping the product cool is the most important rule.The grower should disassemble and safely store the components of rainshelter or nethouse structures if they will not be used for an extended period (> 6 months). Plastic roof and side netting coverings should be washed with a detergent solution, using a high-pressure hose to remove dust, insect eggs, and algae. If compatible with the detergent solution, bleach should be added to the detergent solution, to kill algae. Cleaning the plastic roof and side netting will increase the transmission of sunlight in the rainshelter and net-house structures. Growers should clean the net from the inside-outside direction, as this will reduce accumulation of water inside the NH and facilitate the planting of crops without delay. The grower should promptly repair any damaged parts of the structure.2. To some extent, RS or NH addresses the major factor that limits crop performance in totally enclosed GH, i.e. high mean daily temperatures (>35°C).3. The level of knowledge and skills required for agronomic, crop, environmental and technological management in totally enclosed GH, is arguably higher than what is required for operating RS and NH.In an effort to avoid the technical pitfalls at adopting rain shelter or net-house technologies in the Caribbean, therefore, the following key summary points are presented:1. Avoid locating RS and NH on flood prone land or areas that are below or near sea level (<100 m above sea level).2. There are 'trade-offs' between the types of protective structures and designs utilized, therefore growers should select structures that pose the lowest risk to the production of a specific crop and for which he/she has greater managerial strength.3. All protective structures, whether RS or NH, should be built to withstand strong wind in locations where severe storms and environmental conditions occur.4. When selecting crops for production in RS or NH consider market demand, prices, and cost of production.5. Net-house designs should include two double doors systems as a means of restricting the entry of pest and diseases into the NH. This is an important preventive strategy in pest and disease management in NH.6. Use should be made of an integrated nutrient and pest and disease management systems in crop production.7. Avoid continuously cultivating the same crop in the same substrate or area of land. Use a crop rotation system in the RS and NH.8. Identify and monitor pest and diseases.9. Reduce post-harvest damage by harvesting the crop at the appropriate maturity index, cooling produce promptly and thoroughly, and storing it under the recommended conditions.10. Keep proper and accurate records.With the ever increasing population throughout the Caribbean, satisfying the demand for food becomes the very basic goal of regional agricultural production efforts. Crop production is, however, particularly at risk as substantial losses may occur due to high infestation of insect pests, diseases, weeds and other potentially harmful organisms. For crop production to meet food security objectives, there must be marked improvement in insect pest, disease and weed management. During the 1970s and 1980s, crop protection experts advocated the increased use of broad-spectrum synthetic pesticides to promote crop production. Consequently, the majority of small, resourcepoor farmers throughout the Caribbean have developed an unhealthy reliance on pesticides which has become a crucial component towards achieving optimum farm productivity. Fernandez et al. (2007) noted that increased pesticide use results from poor land management practices together with loss of agricultural lands to other economic activities. The resulting massive pest outbreaks from this unhealthy reliance on pesticides therefore demands reconsideration of crop protection approaches throughout the Caribbean.Before the advent of synthetic pesticides, most farmers and agricultural practitioners throughout the Caribbean relied entirely on local or natural crop protection methods. Crop protection methods were based on natural products which were not only environmentally friendly, but also culturally acceptable, affordable, cost effective and sustainable. Cultural control measures are knowledge-based and the methods and practices associated with this type of control are easily accepted and adopted. Natural and/or cultural control strategies are very diverse and practices are complementary in most cases. For clarification, some cultural control strategies include:Natural Crop Protection Methods in the Caribbean • Use of disease free plant material and seeds• Practice of crop rotation as this interrupts the life cycle and feeding habits of insects • Intercropping and multi-cropping for control of weeds and insects • Use of plants as sources of bio-rational pesticides (e.g. marigold, neem)• Field sanitation -keeping fields clean at all times Contrary to widespread beliefs, the use of natural, non-chemical crop protection evolved mainly as a result of socio-economic constraints, environmental conditions, natural habitat and the determination to survive (Stoll 1988). Stoll (1988) further stated that 'non-chemical protection practices by small holders and organic farmers attempt to make maximum use of local knowledge resources'.Local knowledge is defined as the knowledge of a person or people within various communities that is considered holistically correct. This local knowledge has been developed over centuries. Local knowledge is not confined to specific areas. It can be rural or urban. All developing communities possess local knowledge. It is knowledge that has been tested and proven by past experiences and then adapted into culture and rituals. Local knowledge is passed from one generation to the next by word of mouth. It has its uniqueness in certain geographical areas. It is not uncommon to find different people in different countries who share the same practices.According to Warburton and Martin (1999), local knowledge relates to the entire system of concepts, beliefs and perceptions that people hold about the world around them. This includes the way people observe and measure their surroundings, how they solve problems and validate new information. It includes the processes whereby knowledge is generated, solves problems and transmitted to one another.Indigenous knowledge on the other hand is a knowledge system that is unique and sacred to a particular society. Its movement or passage between generations occurs through what is known as oral traditions. The preservation of various customs and beliefs through this type of knowledge system enabled the conservation of agricultural practices, health benefits and environmental protection. This knowledge is often compared with local knowledge and often times the definition is used interchangeably. According to one writer, indigenous knowledge is local knowledge that is unique to a culture or society. Indigenous knowledge has also been referred to as 'folk knowledge' or 'people's science' (Senanayake 2006).Indigenous knowledge systems have played important roles in the debate on cultural policies and developmental planning in some countries. Warren et al. (1995) noted that 'local people know a great deal about their environment in which they have lived for generations. ' Darkoh (2009) stated that a blend of modern science and local knowledge will be required to face the challenges of the environment on a sustainable basis in the decades ahead for many in Africa. Certainly, this view is relevant not only for Africa, but for most developing countries, and in particular the Caribbean region.Local knowledge must be preserved to promote sustainable agriculture. Within the confinements of agriculture and food security, the incorporation of local knowledge would impact the dependency on synthetic chemical methods of crop protection. Communities have successfully utilized local knowledge for centuries and its worth should never be underestimated.Prior to synthetic chemical inputs, farmers and practitioners relied entirely on natural protection methods. Today however, there is a grave risk that much local knowledge is being lost and, along with it, valuable knowledge about ways of living sustainably.This chapter focuses on local and natural, non-chemical crop protection practices used on various crops throughout the Caribbean region. It will detail the significance of promoting and supporting these ecologically based strategies for the sustainable production of food for small producers to ensure food security in the region. It will provide a compilation of surveys conducted among aging farmers of successful practices used throughout the Caribbean and will also explore other examples which could be successfully adopted from other countries. It attempts to not only to promote the use of local knowledge of small farm holders but also to strengthen it with external knowledge and scientific references. Research has shown that an integrated or holistic approach to crop protection is recommended. For such an approach, it is clear that appropriate crop protection strategies for small farmers can only result from a thorough understanding of the interrelationships between the natural, technological and socio-economic conditions. It is therefore important for farmers to understand the principles of crop protection and then adapt, rather than adopt, promising pest management techniques to their unique situations.Pest management presents one of the greatest challenges to farmers throughout the Caribbean region. Collectively, a group of farmers interviewed to assess their local crop protection knowledge experienced the same types of pest problems. Pest damage caused by insects included damage to leaves, stems, fruits, tubers, and even entire plants. A wide range of non-chemical, natural materials and methods are employed for pest management across the region. Some of the more important ones include:Ash: which is obtained by burning of leaves, branches, parts of trees and grasses is sprinkled on plants to prevent damage by pest insects. Ash is also placed around the rootsNatural Crop Protection Methods in the Caribbean of plants, trees and other crops showing signs of insect damage. This is a very common practice on banana and plantain (Musa spp.) farms in the Caribbean. Most farmers believe that it is the best remedy for nematodes and weevils which attack these crops. Ash is also used as a protective covering against biting insects in particular on some vegetable beds. After harvesting of some crops (eg. yams (Dioscorea esculentum), the exposed area is dipped into ash before storing to protect against post-harvest storage insects. Dried seeds and beans are also stored with a mixture of ash and ground black pepper (Piper nigrum). The use of ground bay leaf (Pimenta racemosa) leaves together with ash was reported to be effective against stored pest insects.The use of soapy water is also very common among farmers. This solution was made primarily with \"blue soap\" (detergent bar) and is sprayed or sprinkled on insect affected plants. This practice was used to control aphids, mealybugs and scale insects.Marigold: Grainge and Ahmed (1988) noted that a variety of plants and their extracts can also be used against many pest organisms. The planting of marigold (Tagetes spp.) between certain crops reduces the incidence of insect damage. Marigold flowers produce an unpleasant odour which acts as an insect repellent. The leaves and flowers are crushed and soaked either overnight or for a few days in water. The mixture is then strained to remove the solid parts and the remaining mixture is used to spray vegetable and other food crops for the management of various caterpillars and aphids.The use of garlic either alone or in combination with other plant extracts (eg. hot pepper (Capsicum spp.) as an insect deterring agent is quite common. Like marigold, it has an unpleasant odor that repels insects and produces a burning sensation on contact with the skin. Two bulbs of garlic, crushed and soaked in about 2 litres of water would make a strong enough concoction that can be applied to plants and other infested crops.Neem: Some farmers also experiment with neem (Azadirachta indica). The leaves and seeds were either crushed and soaked in water for several days or boiled to make a strong solution which is then used to protect crops against insect damage and infestation. The use and effectiveness of neem is highlighted by Stoll (1988).Urine: Both human and cow urine are also commonly used in crop protection throughout the region. They are either administered in their fresh or stale form by collecting urine from the household or farm each morning. The urine is then poured into cut bamboo joints (about 9 joints in total) and left for seven to nine days to ferment, producing a very pungent scent. The resulting fermented urine can be diluted or used as is. The stale solution is believed to be a good insect repellent. The use of urine is particularly prevalent among farmers who cultivate banana, plantain, vegetables and citrus. The application of urine to plants is usually done during the evening time as most insects pests associated with these crops feed at night. Kerosene: Both kerosene and diesel are also utilized as pest management options in the destruction of ant nests by burning and also along the crop field perimeter or along fences to avoid the intrusion of pests. Disinfectants (e.g. 'black disinfectant' or Jeyes Fluid) are also used in the same manner as kerosene and diesel.Larger pests: Most studies of natural pesticides are concerned with their effects on insects. However, in many cases, the management of larger pests including birds, lizards, rats, squirrels and snakes also present a serious challenge. In some instances, farmers have reported using substances such as diesel and kerosene around the boundaries of their fields to restrict to the entry of snakes, lizards and rats in particular while others are destroyed by the use of shot guns or homemade devices (e.g. slingshots). Despite its significance as Tobago's national bird, the Cocrico (Ortalis ruficauda), is considered a pest by some farmers and home-based practices such as soaking fruits in alcohol to cause intoxication of the birds is also utilized. Scarecrows are sometimes also utilized to control the Cocrico. Farine, a local product made using cassava is soaked in water and then left in the field as a trap for birds. When eaten, it chokes the birds and allows them to be easily caught and destroyed. Traps are made for some types of birds using the latex from the outer bark of selected trees, especially breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) and locally referred to as 'laglee'. This is then left to 'set' and becomes very sticky. This sticky substance (laglee) is then spread over very thin pieces of sticks and placed in strategic locations in the field to trap birds. Various traps are made to capture mammalian pests including rats (Rattus spp.), manicou (Didelphis marsupialis), agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) and squirrels (Sciurus granatensis) in particular. Uncultivated sites can provide refuge for weeds during the non-crop period. Traditionally, most weeds are controlled physically by 'cutlassing' or burning. Some Caribbean farmers practise mulching or intercropping of cover crops as a form of, or to facilitate weed control. Intercropping also minimizes the incidence of insect pests as the case of Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Cuba where damage to vegetable and row crops is reduced when they are intercropped with corn (Venotola 2013).Farmers in some Caribbean islands practise biological control on their farms. Cuban farmers are an excellent and successful example of the use of this form of pest management. Venotola (2013) stated that Cuban farmers use the natural enemy, Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). These are small wasps which parasitize the eggs of a range of crop pest insects including the cassava hornworm (Erinnyis ello L. (Lepidoptera:| 145Natural Crop Protection Methods in the Caribbean Sphingidae), the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and the sugarcane borer (Diatraea saccharalis F. (Lepidoptera:Crambidae). Additionally, farmers also use homegrown biopesticides including Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to control mosquitoes and lepidopterous pests which affect crucifers and corn, citrus, potato leafminers and mites. A local strain of the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana, is used to control the sweet potato weevil Cylas formicarius F. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) with much success. Farmers also use the carnivorous bighead ant, Pheidole megacephala F. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) which is found in banana plantations to kill the sweet potato weevil. Korada (2010) described the Cuban farmers' technique of rolling these ants in banana leaves for transport to sweet potato fields. The whitefly Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) which is a pest of a range of crop plants is controlled by farmers who spray a suspension of the fungus Verticillium lecanii on their crops, particularly tomatoes and beans (Nicholls et al. 2002). • Intercropping cabbage with tomato and the application of neem extracts has shown promising results (Shankar et al. 2007) • Planting marigold (Tagetes spp.) as a trap crop has given 30-50 percent reduction of the larval population (Stoll 1988) • Early morning overhead irrigation reduces egg laying and causes adults to fall to ground where they are consumed by predators (e.g. ants)• Field sanitation -removal and destruction of crop residues reduce incidence of diamondback moth in subsequent cropThe use of insect repellent plants is also recommended (Stoll 1988). These include: Annona spp., Chilli, Mammea americana, Neem seed extracts, Tephrosia candida and tumeric. Other methods include the use of Bacillus thuringiensis and saturated green sticky traps (Hallett et al. 1995) Liriomyza sativae (Blanch.) and Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) (Diptera:Agromyzidae) Main crops affected: cabbage, cucumber, legumes, tomatoPreventive measures:• Use non infested planting material (Hymenoptera:Braconidae) can provide as much as 50-90 percent parasitism for these leafminers (Cock et. al. 1985). Use insect controlling plants/plant extracts such as neem, quassia and hot pepper. Aqueous quassia extract gave better control than the synthetic insecticide malathion (Pluke et al. 1999). Other methods of control include the yellow leafminer sticky trap and ash.Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera:Aleyrodidae) Main crops affected: Tomato, sweet pepper, melongene, sweet potato, poinsettia, crucifersCultural practices:• Use of disease free plant material as infected plants may spread viral diseases• Encourage natural enemies (parasitoids -Encarsia spp. (Hymenoptera:Aphelinidae)| 151Natural Crop Protection Methods in the Caribbean and Eretmocerus spp. (Hymenoptera:Aphelinidae) and predators -ladybird beetles, syrphid fly, lacewing insects).• Entomopathogenic fungus, Paecilomyces fumosoroseus -kills the whitefly adults but has no effect on the plants (Matthew and Khan 2013) • Use yellow sticky traps hung just above the crop canopy• Other traditional methods (e.g. the use of kerosene-soap emulsion and milk powder spray to keep the adults from flying).• Intercrop vegetable crops with corn (Venotola 2013)Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Main crop affected: Sweet potatoPreventive measures:• Frequent scouting of fields for adult weevils and remove and destroy• Planting in late rainy season, as practised in Kenya. Pest attack is high on the foliage before the onset of the dry season. The tubers begin to enlarge when it rains again, but few soil cracks are present. As a result, weevils cannot gain access to the tubers and their numbers diminish.Cultural methods:• Crop rotation or fallow to reduce the weevil population• Manage host weeds belonging to the Morning Glory family• Thick skinned, early maturing varieties and those which form tubers deeper in the soil should be planted• Use clean, uninfested cuttings as planting materials to reduce incidence of pests (weevils, moths, diseases)• Practise field sanitation by removal of crop residue as this reduces weevil populations• Moulding vines fills cracks in the soil and prevents access to tubers by weevils• Pheromone traps should be used for early detection and mating disruption• Tubers for storage can be covered with a layer of sand (at least 5cm) or dusted with ashCosmopolites sordidus (Germar)(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Main crops affected: Banana and plantainSeveral natural enemies have been introduced into the Caribbean to control C. sordidus including Plaesius javanus Erichs (Coleoptera: Histeridae), Dactylosternum hydrophiloides (Macleay) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) and D. abdominale (F.) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) from South-East Asia and Hololepta quadridentata (F.) (Coleoptera: Histeridae) a native species of Trinidad (Cock et al. 1985). Entomopathogenic fungi such as Metarhizum anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana can also be used and provide some degree of control (Khan and Gangapersad 2001).Cultural methods:• Use of clean planting material (infestation drops from 24 percent to five percent)• Cutting old pseudostems off at ground level Dysmicoccus brevipes Cockerell (Hemiptera:Pseudococcidae) Main crops affected: pineapple, sugarcane, coffee, plantainA number of natural enemies attack this mealybug in the Caribbean including Hambletonia pseudococcinna Compere (Hymenoptera: Encrytidae) which is found in several islands of the Lesser Antilles (Cock et al. 1985). Management of this pest is essential not only due to crop losses as a result of direct feeding but also because of its ability to spread pathogens. This pineapple mealybug spreads the associated wilt viruses which have recently been detected in the Caribbean (Cuba) for the first time (Hernandez et al. 2010). A hot water treatment of pineapple crowns at 50°C for 30 minutes gave complete control of theNatural Crop Protection Methods in the Caribbean pineapple mealybug associated wilt virus and also allowed 100 percent plant survival (Ullman et al. 1993) Cultural methods:• Bait made of powdered skimmed milk, wheat flour, wheat middling and insecticide was attractive to ants tending pineapple mealybug. Death of ants after feeding on bait caused 75 percent reduction in mealybug population (Rai and Sinha 1980) • Removal and burning of crop residues before replanting reduces ant and mealybug population in new cropAnastrepha spp. (Diptera:Tephritidae) Main crops affected: guava, (Psidium guajava L.), sapodilla (Manilkara zapota), and numerous soft fruitsManagement of Anastrepha spp. requires a multi-pronged approach (i.e. IPM). Several natural enemies have been introduced into the Caribbean for management of these fruit flies but limited success has been recorded (Cock et al. 1985).• Regular collection and destruction of fallen fruits• Bagging of individual fruits may be an option for small farms and backyard gardens There are several ways in which a farmer can manage agricultural pests and diseases without relying on chemicals. The following is a list and brief description of some of these methods:Improving and changing the conditions of the garden area can make it difficult for pests to survive. This can be achieved through destruction of food sources and habitats and breeding areas for pests, controlling weeds, practising crop rotation, using companion crops that attract beneficial insects, proper water and fertilizer management and using plant species that are tolerant to pest and disease attack. Such an integrated crop management approach is considered as one of the easiest and cheapest methods that the farmer can adopt without the use of chemicals.• Cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus chinensis/maculatus) -can be controlled by using custard apple, neem, Christmas bush (Chromolaena odorata) and marigold.• Thrips (Thrips palmi) -can be controlled using fresh red chili, garlic, pepper, bitter gourd/carille (Mormodica charantis), custard apple, billy goat weed (Ageratum conizyoides) and Christmas bush.• Damping off -moringa leaves and garlic can be useful• Fusarium wilt -moringa root, celery and seed under leaf (Phyllanthus niruri) can be useful• Fungi -can be controlled using aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis) and garlic (Allium sativum).• Root rot -can be controlled using seed under leaf, citronella and eucalyptus.| 155Natural Crop Protection Methods in the Caribbean Box 5.2: Prevention and control methods for insects and diseases Tancho, 2013).• Regular field scouting is recommended to look for insect pests and infected plants.Where there are low cases of insect or disease incidence, remove pests manually from infested plants and burn to avoid further infestation and contamination. Spraying with concentrated lime water mixed at a ratio of one part per lime water to three parts water, or use 0.5 kg, plus 0.5 kg of ashes from hardwood trees mixed with 20 litres of water may also be useful. Mix together, filter and then spray over the collected, infested plants.• Practise companion planting using plants such as marigolds, tomatoes and chive with vegetables. The smell of these plants serves to repel insects when their leaves are crushed.• Use of colour and light to trap and trick insects. Insects can be attracted to various colours such as blue, red and yellow. Yellow sticky traps can be used to capture insects while insect-luring lights can be used using blue light. A simple insect-luring light can be made as follows:Place a big bowl of water under a light source. Add petroleum oil to the water to entrap any fallen insects. If a blue light is not available, you can wrap the bulb with blue paper or tape. Take all necessary precautions.• Use sulphur powder for mite outbreaks by diluting 75 ml in 20 litres of water. This solution can be sprayed over and under the leaves of infected plants. Diluted fermented cow urine can also be used as a substitute for sulphur sprays.• Adjust soil pH before planting using dolomite, egg or sea shells or burned animal bones pounded and mixed into the soil. This will also help to reduce disease and water logging in the soil. For sandy soil, add 250 kg of dolomite mixture per acre (617 kg/ ha); for loam soil, add 500 kg of dolomite mixture per acre (1,235 kg/ha) and for clay soil, add of dolomite mixture 700 kg per acre (1,729 kg/ha).• Avoid application of too much nitrogen fertilizer as plants will grow too quickly, use too much water, and their cell walls will become susceptible to the penetration of fungi.• Remove infected plants immediately when discovered and spray trees with fermented bio liquids such as compost teas.Source: Tancho, 2013There are several plants which may have natural pest repellent properties. The use of plant extracts is not new and extracted plant compounds such as rotenone, nicotine and pyrethrins have been used by small-scale subsistence and even commercial producers.There are a few things to consider before collecting parts of desired plants. The age of the plant will affect how much substances can be extracted. The time for collection is also very important because each substance will be available in varying amounts depending on the season and time of day. The effective substances originate from the plants' own biochemical processes and are stored in specific places as part of their own defense system. In some plants such as tobacco, it is found in the leaf. For peppers, it is located in the fruit. Neem and custard apples store their insecticidal substances in their seeds. Lemon grass provides the maximum effects at 7-11 months. Collection from leaves should be done during the day in dry weather. It is necessary, therefore, to know each type of plant and where their effective substances are stored in order to be able to collect them correctly for use against pests. For plants which contain volatile oil, such as basil and Christmas bush, the maximum amount can only be collected in the morning. In these plants, sunlight reduces the amount of volatile oil in the leaf. The most common extraction methods include: fermentation, steam distillation, compression and extraction using solvents. Table 5.5 offers some useful generalizations on the best time to harvest plants.• There are about 2,500 different plants with insecticidal properties. Many of them contain potent substances such as alkaloids, ricin, capsaicin, rotenone, thiopene, terpenoids, phenols, azadiracthin, pyrethrum, nicotine, solanine, etc.• Natural plant substances are usually safe and non-toxic to humans and animals.• They do not leave any toxic residues.• Chances of insect resistance are minimal compared to synthetic chemicals.• They are cheap to produce and readily available or can be easily made by the user.• They have huge economic potential and can be used in extract form.| 157Natural Crop Protection Methods in the Caribbean The following common plants found throughout the Caribbean have been reported as having pest repellent properties:Family: Sapindaceae Ethanol and acetone extracts of ackee were also recorded as repellent to three pests (Khan and Gumbs 2003) while extracts in hexane were toxic to the sweet potato weevil C. elegantulus (Wilson and Mansingh 2004). Wilson (1993) also concluded that ethanolic extract from ackee gave better control of diamondback moth 2 weeks after field application compared to neem extract.Powdered seeds of ackee were toxic to three stored product pests -cowpea beetle Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera:Bruchidae), Rusty grain beetle Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens) (Coleoptera: Cucujidae) and maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (Khan et al. 2002).Family: AnnonaceaeThe unripe fruit, seeds, leaves and roots have been found to have potent ovicidal, insecticidal, repellent and nematicidal properties. Compounds isolated from A. montana have been shown to possess powerful antifeedant activity (Mootoo et al. 2000). The active chemical is called, acetogenin.Grind seeds into powder and soak one kg of the powder in 10 litres of water, leaving undisturbed for 12-24 hours. Filter with a thin white cloth.Before using, mix the solution with a sticking agent such as powdered detergent or dishwashing liquid at a rate of one tbsp. detergent to ten litres of solution.The dark green leaves can be ground or crushed before soaking in water for 24 hours. Mix the solution before using and add a sticking agent at the same rate as above.Powdered seeds of custard apple have also been used to control lice (Ayensu 1981), aphids, diamond back moth caterpillar, leafhoppers and various types of grasshoppers.Family: LamiaceaeThe plants have insecticidal, fungicidal, repellent and molluscidal properties. O. sanctum seeds are used as a mosquito larvicide. It can also be effective against the housefly larva and the sweet potato weevil (Sujatha et al. 1988). Essential oil can also be extracted from the leaves. About 20 mls of the essential oil of basil mixed into 1 litre of water can be sprayed onto vegetables to control pest and diseases.Family: Phyllanthaceae A powder of its roots is used to control melonworm (Diaphania hyalinata) and diamondback moth (P. xylostella) (Pluke et al. 1999).Family: Piperaceae Contains essential oils that repel insects. Grind dried black pepper fruit then soak in rice whisky. Filter out the solids and spray the remaining solution. Effective against aphids and the cabbage-heart caterpillar (Tancho 2013).Family: Euphorbiaceae Can be grown around the garden to keep away pests. The active chemical is called ricin. The leaves and seeds are effective against termites, crickets, nematodes and rats.Natural Crop Protection Methods in the CaribbeanFamily: SolanaceaeThe skin and seeds of ripe fruits contain active insecticidal substances. Its actions include -stomach poison, repellent, antifeedant, fumigant and viroid. It is listed as being effective against ants, aphids, rice weevil and other beetles (Pluke et al. 1999). Amoabeng et al., (2013) conclude that field application of C. frutescens extracts provided better control of diamondback moth than some synthetic insecticides and also had less detrimental effects on natural enemies including ladybird beetles, spiders and wasps which continued to feed on the pest after applicationFamily: Asteraceae Contains eupatal which is a natural insecticide. Grind the dried leaves and stems into a powder and soak 400g of the powder in eight litres of water. Shake the mixture thoroughly before filtering. Spray the solution every seven days for a total of six applications (Tancho 2013).Can be used for the control of aphids, common cutworm, diamondback moth and grain storage pests.Family: Myrtaceae Contains essential oils that effectively repel and control many insects. Combine one kg of eucalyptus leaves with two tbsp. of ground ginger. Boil the leaves for 15-20 mins and filter. The stock solution can be used with other sprays (Tancho 2013).Effective against diamondback moth, common cutworm and grain storage pests.Family: PoaceaeLemongrass extracts have been reported to possess powerful insecticidal and repellent properties (Anon 2014).Grind the dried lemongrass and soak in water (400gm ground leaves to eight litres of water) for 24 hours.The ground dried lemongrass can be blended with mung bean.Both the oil and dry powder is efficient at protecting stored seeds against the cowpea beetle Callosobrachus maculatus by inhibiting oviposition on the seeds (Ketoh et al. 2000).Extracts from lemongrass were also toxic and repellent to the maize weevil S. zeamais (Ramlal 2014). Also effective against the common cutworm and diamondback moth.Family: Amaryllidaceae Alicin, which is a compound derived from garlic is effective against many types of fungi and can also be used as an insecticide and repellent as it inhibits feeding.To 150 gms of crushed garlic, add half litre of hot water and leave undisturbed for 24 hours before filtering. Add another four litres of water and mix with a sticking agent such as dishwashing liquid before spray. Spray at least twice a day.Effective against beetles, aphids, nematodes, white flies, downy mildew, leaf rusts, fleas and ticks (Tancho 2013).Family: FabaceaeThe active ingredient in gliricidia is coumarin and rotenone. The leaves, bark and fruit of this plant all have insecticidal properties.Leaf extracts of G. sepium in ethanol were shown to cause high mortality and reduced egg laying in the carmine spider mite Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Sivira et al. 2011). The smoke from burning leaves and branches of G. sepium is used in the Philippines as a repellent against blood feeding insects (Obico and Ragragio 2014).Family: Verbenaceae Contains lantadine and lantamine which is toxic to the nervous system of insects One kg of the lantana seeds can be ground and then soaked in two litres of water and left for 24 hours. After filtering, spray as an insecticide.Can be used for the control of the army worm in corn. It also repels insects that lay eggs in vegetable gardens (Tancho 2013).Family: GuttifereaeThe seeds of the mammey can be finely ground and four kgs dissolved in 400 litres of soapy water or kerosene. This can be used to control caterpillars.225 gms of the leaves of the mammey can be soaked in 1.2 litres of kerosene. This is effective against cockroaches, houseflies and ants.Natural Crop Protection Methods in the Caribbean Powder from the dried seeds has insecticidal properties with stomach poison, contact and repellent activity against aphids, diamondback moth, beetles, banana borer weevil and acoushi ants (Atta cephalotes). Dusting cabbage with the dry powder early in the morning to allow it to stick on the leaves (wet with dew) and effects good control of diamondback moth (Pluke et al. 1999). The powder from dried leaves of mammey gave 59 percent and 75 percent control of S. frugiperda and D. hyalinata respectively (Morton 1987). Wrapping young tomato plant stems with a mammey leaf and then planting so that half is covered with soil and the other half exposed above ground prevents damage by mole crickets (Morton 1987).Family: CompositaeThe active chemical is called thiopene. 500 gms of marigold leaves can be boiled in four litres of water. Allow to cool then filter. Add another four litres of water and spray onto infested plants.The extracts of the leaves are effective against the diamondback moth, nematodes, beetles, aphids and cabbage heart caterpillar (Tancho 2013).Family: Euphorbiaceae Stems of the milk bush can be crushed and about 1 kilogram can be soaked in 15-20 litres of water. Leave for a day. Filter out the liquid and spray onto infested plants.The crushed stem can be used to control cowpea weevils, common cutworms, aphids and grain storage pests (Tancho 2013).Family: Moringaceae Contains substances that kills fungi and bacteria. Both seeds and leaves are effective. Mix moringa leaves with soil being prepared for sowing seeds; leave undisturbed for one week.Effective against root and stem rot of cucurbits, tomato fruit rot, and damping off.Family: MeliceaeThe leaves and seeds of the neem tree are known to possess insecticidal compounds, some of which is commercially available. The active chemical is called azadirachtin.Grind the dried seeds and soak in the water in the proportion of one kg of neem seed to 20 litres of water. After leaving undisturbed for one to two days, spray onto infested crops.For dried neem fruit, soak one kg in ten litres of water. Aqueous extracts of either the seed or leaves provide good control of both lepidopterous and coleopterous larvae as well as leafminers, aphids and grasshoppers (Pluke et al. 1999). Dried seed powder can also be used effectively to control stored product insects.Family: Myristicaceae Nutmeg oil extract was both toxic and repellent to adult maize weevils S. zeamais (Ramlal 2014). Nutmeg oil has strong insect feeding deterrent properties against stored product insects (Parthasarathy et al. 2008).Family: CaricaceaeThe leaves of the papaya can be finely chopped and about one kg placed in one litre of water. Separate the liquid by filtering with a cloth. Combine the liquid with four litres of water and then mix in 16 gms of detergent and spray onto infected plant.Can be used to manage rusts and powdery mildew (Tancho 2013).Family: EuphorbiaceaeThe whole plant, particularly the seeds have insecticidal properties.Both the dried powder and oil from the seeds of physic nut are known to be insecticidal. The oil has been recorded as having low environmental persistence and non-toxic to beneficial insects (Pluke et al. 1999). Physic nut seed oil reduced the hatching of eggs of the sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis Fab. (Lepidoptera:Crambidae) (Oliveira et al. 2013).Family: Portulacaceae Pursley has been reported to contain insecticidal compounds which are toxic to diamondback moth (Grainge and Ahmed 1988;Iwu 1993).Family: Simaroubaceae Contains quassin, a natural insecticide.Natural Crop Protection Methods in the Caribbean Boil small pieces of the plant (500 gms) in 10 litres of water and leave undisturbed for 24 hours. Filter out the solids before dissolving two kgs of soap in three litres water to the solution. Add more water for a total of 100 litres.The bark of bitter ash is known to have insecticidal and nematicidal activity. Bark extract acts as a contact insecticide, a stomach poison and also systemically and hence can be applied to plant roots for protection against sucking and chewing insect pests. Aqueous extracts applied to plants also deter insects (e.g. sweet potato whitefly B. tabaci) from feeding on the treated plant parts Flores et al. (2008). Bitter ash extracts have also been used in organic agriculture (Psota et al. 2010). Can be used to control aphids, diamondback moth, leafminers, mites and cucumber worms (Tancho 2013).Family: Solanaceae Repels insects and inhibits feeding and egg laying. Grind three gms of fresh tomato leaves and add five litres of water or grind 50 gms of fresh leaves and add to two litres of warm/hot water. Allow to soak for five hours then filter with a thin white cloth. Add sticker to mixture such as dishwashing liquid at a rate of one tbsp per ten litres water. Spray every two days in the evening.Effective against the flea beetle (Phyllotreta sinuata), stem borers, houseflies, the diamondback moth, nematodes, cockroaches and red mites (Tancho 2013).Family: Verbanaceae Ethanolic extracts from the leaves of S. jamaicensis had antifeedant effects against the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda in Trinidad (Moustache and Khan, 2012) while extracts from the leaves of another species (S. mutabilis) in Guyana exhibited antifeedant effects against locusts and armyworms (Pluke et al. 1999).Family: Bombacaceae Used for trapping the cocoa beetle Steirastoma breve. Branches are cut and placed in wire baskets, beetles are attracted to it to lay eggs. Branches are burned every few days and new traps set up (Hall 1914).Family: Leguminosae Leaves of wild coffee are used as a seed protectant against the cowpea beetle C. maculatus (Lienard et al. 1993) and also against termites which can be a serious problem in agriculture (Abdullah et al. 2012). Leaf extracts were also toxic to mosquito (Aedes aegypti) larvae (Chariandy et al. 1999).• Amaranthus, bhaji or callalloo (Amaranthus spp. -stems, flowers and leaves used),• Annatto (Bixa oreliana -fruits and roots used),• Bougainvillea (Bougainvella glabra -leaves and flowers used),• Cashew (Anacardium occidentale -leaves, seeds, seed oil used),• Fish bean (Tephrosia spp. -whole plant, leaves, twigs and roots contain rotenone),• Goat weed (Ageratum conyzoides -all parts of plant used),• Jimson weed (Datura stramonium -whole plant, especially leaves used),• Oleander (Nerium oleander -all parts of plant used),• Onion (Allium cepa -bulb and leaves used),• Pyrethrum (Chrysanthemum cinerarieafolium -flowers contain pyrethrum),• Soyabean (Glycine max -stems used),• Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas -leaves and starch water used),• Tamarind (Tamarindus indica -leaves and fruit used),• Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum -leaves and stems contain nicotine).Natural Crop Protection Methods in the CaribbeanA combination of local and natural crop protection measures blended with certain aspects of modern agriculture is recommended to achieve sustainable agriculture practices. In order to ensure the adoption and continuity of some of these ecologically friendly practices, researchers, scientists and extension workers must ensure that this knowledge is disseminated effectively. The focus on one or two plant species used as pesticides could be expanded since there are diverse plant species that possess pesticidal properties. This will require further validation trials and basic research. To avoid ad hoc application of non-chemical pesticides, appropriate testing of materials and ingredients should be done to avoid toxicity. This would ensure that the correct amounts are applied to crop and insect pests. The effectiveness of each application of pesticide due to its active ingredients on each specific type of insect should be tested and documented. This would result in grading of the various formulations according to strength. Information on non-chemical crop protection methods must be reliable and made easily available through workshops, books, journals, media and the internet. The adoption of these indigenous and natural crop protection practices should be encouraged and considered a priority in the region in order to curb the heavy dependence on synthetic pesticides.Water is one of the most valuable resources on the planet earth. Threefourths of earth's surface is covered by water, which constitutes 60-70 % of the weight of the living world. Water is used for many purposes including drinking, domestic and industrial use, and agricultural production. Water also determines the density and function of vegetation and biodiversity richness in an ecosystem, making it ecohydrologically important. It is implicated in many biogeochemical processes exerting a strong control on microbial activity, nitrogen mineralization, and biogeochemical cycling of nitrogen and carbon (Robinson et al. 2008). Water is also important for many physical and chemical weathering processes on earth and transportation of large amounts of sediments. As a fundamental raw material in photosynthesis, it is central to acid-base neutrality and enzyme function. Therefore, the state of this resource, with respect to its quality, and availability (i.e. whether there is 'too much' or 'too little'), can have economical, biological and ecological implications.In spite of the large volume of water on the planet earth, only three percent is fresh water and 0.06 percent easily accessible for human use (Ekwue, Dhanraj and Birch 2013). Professor Henry Lin of Pennsylvania State University (Schneider 2013) in describing the dwindling nature of this important resource, asserted that 'if a beer barrel -13 gallons -represents all of the water on earth, the total amount of fresh water is just ten drops. Not only that, but out of that ten drops, only one-tenth of one drop is surface water that we can see and directly access' (Schneider 2013). With the expected increase in the world's population to nine billion people by the year 2050, demand for food will increase. In order to meet the food demand for this teeming population, food production will have to increase correspondingly by Sustainable Water Management Practices for Food Production in the Caribbeanabout 70 percent (Schneider 2013). Presently, irrigated agriculture which uses 70 percent of fresh water produces 40 percent of the world's food. With an increasing demand for food, coupled with competing demands from industries, urbanization, recreation, continuing pollution and climate change, the world's water resources will become even more strained (Schneider 2013). This situation will have a more precarious impact where land is limited as in the case of small island developing states (SIDS) like those of the Caribbean region, which are already densely populated, limited in reservoir storage facilities, vulnerable to climate change impact, and with agriculture that is estimated to utilize 60-70 percent of the total fresh water resources (Farrell, Nurse and Moseley 2007).The quality and quantity of available water resources in the Caribbean are already being strained. Climate change is having a strong impact on the water resources. Intense rainstorm activities have increased over the years resulting in colossal runoff generation and flooding problems, causing a decrease in groundwater recharge and aquifer depletion. Concomitantly, sea level rise due to climate change has increased the proneness of lowlands to flooding and salinization, and saltwater intrusion into coastal aquifers. In addition to climate change impacts, population growth and urbanization have put more strain on the existing water resources through agricultural chemicals and human waste which pollute both aquifers and surface water. There is also the problem of over abstraction, which depletes aquifers and changes in land use, which increases runoff and decreases recharge to aquifers. Soils in the Caribbean, except in islands with volcanic soils, are mostly medium to heavy in texture, with impeded drainage. Most of the soils have a restrictive layer that can easily develop a perched water table with attendant waterlogging issues that significantly affect plant water relations. The soils can therefore be exposed to prolonged waterlogging and high water tables under intense rainfall. This lowers the productive capacity of the land for food production. Sustainable water management must therefore address water issues related to its scarcity and excess.As Caribbean nations seek to attain food security, therefore, adequate water of good quality is required to maximise both yield and quality. Consequently, there is heavy reliance on fresh water for domestic, agricultural and commercial uses. However, sustainable management of water resources has not been given the priority it deserves in many Caribbean islands. Unsustainable use of water resources will intensify our water woes leading to food insecurity and slows the advancement of the Caribbean region towards meeting poverty and hunger reduction targets. The following economic, social and environmental impacts have been identified as repercussions for failure to sustainably use and manage our water resources (Taylor, Stephenson and • Reduction in subsistence and commercial agricultural production of such crops as vegetables, bananas, and coconut with attendant food insecurity issues• Increasing dry spells and sea level rise, intensifying the risk of saline water intrusion into river estuaries and coastal aquifers compromising both the quality of surface and groundwater sources• Increased risk of dengue fever, malaria, cholera, typhoid fever and diarrhoeal diseases• Increasing human conflicts and sufferings.Therefore to achieve a sustainable functioning environment and a food secure Caribbean region, appropriate and sustainable water management practices must be an integral part of the way we use our water resources. Adopting sustainable water management practices will assist in alleviating the economic, social and environmental impacts listed above and will have far reaching benefits to cope with the myriads of constraints that are inimical to achieving food security in the Caribbean region.The Caribbean region is essentially characterized by a humid tropical climate. Rainfall is almost bimodal with two distinct seasons; a dry season from January to May and a wet season from June to December. The rainy season coincides with the hurricane season of June to November, with peak rainfall occurring at the start and end of this season (Cashman, Nurse and John 2010). The mean annual rainfall is large and varies from 1127mm in Antigua and Barbuda to 4500mm in Dominica (Ekwue et al. 2013). Roughly 20 percent to 25 percent of the rainfall received in the Caribbean falls in the dry season, with 75-80 percent falling in the wet season months. The major water management issue in the Caribbean, therefore, is really how to cope with excess water in the wet season to ensure adequate supply allyear round (Ekwue et al. 2013). Even though the Caribbean does not have a steady spatiotemporal rainfall trend, projections reveal that there will be more pronounced dry days and fewer successive wet days, which will become more intense. The annual precipitation, however, is not expected to change drastically; day and night time temperatures are however expected to increase.The hydrological cycle inextricably links climate to water resources. It defines water transfer from bodies of water to the land for storage. Essentially it involves the movement of water from different reservoirs by the physical processes of evaporation, condensation, precipitation, infiltration, run-off and sub-surface flow. The following equations (1 and 2 respectively) are used to calculate the water balance for ground water and surface water respectively:P is precipitation in the form of rain, ET is evapotranspiration, RO is surface water runoff, GW i and GW o are groundwater inflows into and groundwater outflows from the system respectively and ΔGW represents change in subsurface storage. ΔSW represents the change in surface water storage, SW i represents the surface water inflows into the system, SW o represents surface water outflows from the system, G i represents groundwater inflows into the system and G o represents outflows from the system to the groundwater system.Water resources management is strongly influenced by the water balance equation, which in turn is determined by the impact of climate on the hydrological cycle. This is shown by the fact that the interactions between the different variables in the water balance equation can be very intricate and are largely dependent on climate. For instance, temperature and humidity can affect water loss via evaporation and transpiration, while rainfall intensity can affect surface run-off.Climate and weather have many significant impacts on food production within the region. Plant growth and thus yields in the Caribbean are a consequence of the climate experienced in the region. Temperature, precipitation, soil moisture availability, humidity, radiation intensity, day length and wind all vary with latitude. The atmospheric conditions experienced in the region are therefore an expression of our unique location in the world. Climate can also have an effect on livestock. Increases in temperature can cause heat stress to animals thus reducing productivity, increasing animal diseases and altering the quality of food. The increase in invasive species of weeds can also be an effect of climate and weather patterns. An increase in temperature and precipitation can favour one species of plant over the next causing certain species of weeds to out-compete agricultural crops for limited resources thereby reducing crop yield and productivity. Pests and diseases also respond to increased temperature and precipitation favourably, something which may influence their distribution and development. Humidity and evaporation can also play a role in increasing | 173Sustainable Water Management Practices for Food Production in the Caribbean some pest and disease activity. Most processes that occur in the soil are largely influenced by temperature and precipitation and changes in CO 2 . These can affect soil development and therefore determine its characteristics.'Water is not a commercial product like any other but, rather, a heritage which must be protected, defended and treated as such' (Water Framework Directive 2000). The total amount of water on the earth today is nearly the same as 1000 years ago. However, threats of water crisis continue to loom on us. Billions of people lack basic water services, and millions die each year from water-related diseases. This is partly due to the increasing unsustainable use of water resources that degrades the quality of easily accessible fresh water converting it into forms that require expensive technological treatment for remediation.The Caribbean region is endowed with an abundance of water resources (Table 6.1) so that the availability of fresh water should currently not be an issue. However, threats from population growth, unsustainable agricultural practices, and climate change have highlighted the issue of accentuated water insecurity in the Caribbean. Based on Table 6.1, the water resources in the Caribbean are adequate to meet the current water demand for domestic and industrial purposes, except in the low-lying more arid islands of Barbados, Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, and the Virgin Islands, where surface free-flowing water is scarce. The limited data on water resources presented in the FAO Aquastat database (FAO 2013) indicate the critical role of rainfall in determining a nation's water resource supply system. For instance, the lack of perennial rivers in the drier Caribbean islands of Barbados and Antigua and Barbuda as a result of mean annual rainfall that is <1500 mm, indicate that these islands are water scarce. Here, the recharge of ground water as the sole source of water supply by precipitation is critical or else precipitation is lost to the ocean. Therefore, the use of surface ponds and reservoirs as storage facilities is important in alleviating shortages. Sea water desalination has become an important source of water in these islands. Nonetheless, the increased frequency of intense weather conditions, sea level rise and population growth, with their associated decrease in ground water recharge, reduced water quality due to saline intrusion and pollution, pose a serious threat to the continuous supply of water in adequate amounts and quality from these ground water sources.Caribbean countries such as Trinidad and Tobago, Dominica and Jamaica on the other hand, have mean annual rainfall values of > 2000 mm and a water resource supply that is well above the water scarce threshold. These islands have multiple water sources and their water withdrawal is below available resources. Increased water withdrawal via irrigated agriculture in some countries such as Guyana, Belize, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago, however, indicate an increased demand on water resources. Consequently, shortfalls have been experienced during the dry season. Drought episodes were very severe in Trinidad and Tobago among other Caribbean countries in 2009 extending to 2010 (ODPM 2013). To sustain water supply, water for domestic, agricultural and alternative uses was regulated. The accompanying ills of the drought episode, such as forest fires, incidences of crop failure and flash flooding caused by rainfall events following the drought, were severe. Therefore whether too little or too much, the demand for water will increase, requiring us to sustainably manage water resources.Water resources usually take three main forms in the Caribbean region; groundwater, surface water (rivers, springs, lakes, and reservoirs), and sea water. Ground and surface water are the primary sources used to meet public and industrial demands. Desalinization of sea water has, however, become an important supply of potable water to a number of Caribbean Islands (Table 6.1). Water resources may vary among islands depending on geology and topography. For instance, for the islands of Barbados and Antigua with calcareous geology, ground water is the principal natural source of water with desalination supplementing these natural sources.Groundwater constitutes 30 percent of global fresh water stocks, making it by far the largest freshwater resource on earth other than water stored as ice. Groundwater resources are relatively clean, reliable and a cost-effective resource as a source of drinking water, for agricultural irrigation and for maintenance of surface water systems, biodiversity and habitats of sensitive ecosystems (Tharme 2003). Groundwater is water located beneath the earth's surface in aquifers. An aquifer is a layer of porous substrate that traps groundwater in amounts which can then be available to the population. Groundwater resources are an important source of water in the Caribbean, the quantity and quality of which are influenced by a number of factors, including: the location of the aquifer (coastal or inland), whether it's confined or unconfined, the size of the aquifer, the characteristics of the soil around the aquifer, the geology, climate change and variability. Caribbean islands, for example Barbados depend heavily on groundwater for their national supply (Table 6.1).Surface water resources in the Caribbean region take the form of rivers, small lakes and small impoundments. This water resource is the primary source of potable water in most Caribbean countries and is an important component of a nation's water supply system. It is influenced by precipitation, run-off, evaporation and exchanges with the underlying groundwater system. Countries such as St. Vincent, St. Lucia, Dominica, and Trinidad and Tobago all rely on surface water resources to meet the national demand (Table 6.1).Saline bodies of water through the process of desalinization contribute to the water resources of the Caribbean region. Desalinization is the process where salt and other mineralsSustainable Water Management Practices for Food Production in the Caribbean are removed from saline water. It is considered to be one of the few rainfall independent water resources. Salt water is desalinized to produce fresh water for human consumption or irrigation. In Trinidad and Tobago, desalination plants are used to provide fresh water suitable for industrial use as a good alternative of supplementing the country's supply of fresh water leaving more naturally-occurring water for domestic purposes.Soil water is the amount of water that is stored in the soil from rainfall after losses via evapotranspiration, runoff and deep drainage. Soil water is an important water resource particularly because of its role in the ecosystem, the hydrological cycle and in modulating other critical elements of the hydrological cycle. Ecohydrologically, soil water is a vital ecosystem resource that provides the transpiration water needs of plants. It controls the structure and function of vegetation, and diversity in ecosystems. In spite of its overall small amount (~0.05 percent) in the global hydrological cycle, it plays the vital function of regulating the global energy balance and the distribution of precipitation. Soil water governs microbial activity affecting vital biogeochemical processes such as nitrification and CO 2 production via respiration (Robinson et al. 2008).Soil water is important in determining the profile storage for determining antecedent conditions, thereby controlling rainfall-runoff response in systems where saturation excess runoff dominates (Robinson et al. 2008). Soil water performs a critical hydrological role in an ecosystem by controlling infiltration and water recharge to aquifers. By influencing infiltration, runoff generation, evaporation and exchanges with the underlying groundwater system, it determines the quantity and quality of both surface and groundwater.Soil water can be expressed as the soil water content (equation 3) on a mass (gravimetric water content) or volume basis (volumetric water content).• Gravimetric water content (θ g ) is the ratio of the mass of water (M w ) relative to the dry mass of soil (M s ):or, volume basis (volumetric water content)• Volumetric water content (θ v ) is the ratio of the volume of water (V w ) relative to the total volume of soil (V t ):indicating that air and water in the soil occupy the soil pores.Where V a is the volume of air, V s is the volume of solid particles and V f is the volume of pores.To fully characterise soil water, however, the amount of water in the soil (soil water content) and the matric potential (the force by which water is held in the soil matrix) are key factors. Both matric potential and soil water content are related to each other via a function referred to as the soil water characteristic. The status of soil water determined by soil water content and matric potential affect among other things the water available for plant use, rate of exchange between liquid and gaseous phases, the hydraulic conductivity in the soil and exchange between the soil water and groundwater.Available soil water is used by plant for growth and development. Under drought conditions there is less available water for plants, which results in reduced productivity. Under intense rainfall, soils may become waterlogged resulting in transient low aeration. Also soil aggregates are degraded resulting in high runoff generation and erosion reducing the productivity of agricultural crops (Wuddivira, Ekwue and Stone 2010). Consequently, soil and water management practices are required to maintain this pool of water for sustainable food production in the Caribbean.The Caribbean region is extremely vulnerable to water scarcity. Too much or too little rainfall can pose a serious effect on surface and ground water resources in the region. Increased rainfall intensity can result in increased surface runoff reducing recharge into aquifers, while, a reduced rainfall amount coupled with increased temperatures and evapotranspiration rates reduces soil moisture, infiltration and aquifer recharge. It has been shown that in the tropics, approximately 90 percentof net radiation produces evaporation over the oceans (Budyko 1974). Net radiation over the continents heats the surface driving evaporation of water from surfaces of water bodies, soil surfaces and providing energy to plants to remove water from soils. Inconsistent rainfall patterns coupled with high evapotranspiration rates create a water deficit within the region. This occurs especially during the dry season.With the expected impacts of climate change, decreases in crop yields are anticipated with reductions in surface water causing less water to become available for irrigation. Prolonged high temperatures can also cause cracking in heavy clay soils which can also cause soil loss. Higher ocean levels will lead to salt water intrusion in groundwater supplies, threatening the quality and quantity of freshwater access to large populations. Saline water intrusion percolating through underground channels can affect the quality of fresh water in aquifers.Sustainable Water Management Practices for Food Production in the Caribbean Saline water intrusion usually occurs as a result of sea level rise, which is a consequence of climate change and can be devastating to a country's economy, as a substantial portion of most islands' economic activity occurs a few kilometres inland. Saline water intrusion is already a problem in many countries including small islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and the Caribbean Sea.Increased rainfall intensity and poor irrigation practices which characterize the Caribbean region can also cause excess water to accumulate in the root zone, causing waterlogging damage and a decline in the vigour and productivity of crops. This often occurs in soils with poor natural drainage caused by restricted layers beneath the root zone. Additionally, soils found in low elevations and flat landscapes are prone to excess water accumulation in the root zone. Therefore, effective water management should include the drainage of the excess soil water from the root zone in poorly drained soils and using appropriate water conservation measures to protect water resources from pollution and loss of water from the root zone.Water is one of life's most valuable resources. As such, responsible and efficient water management practices are mandatory to alleviate the increasing pressures on our water resources. One significant way to reduce the threats that water insecurity presents in the Caribbean is through an integrated water management plan. This plan involves differentiating water into different shades (blue, green and grey) and ranking its importance for human use. Proper management that involves the use of blue, green and grey water can improve water security in the region. As we look for new ways of preserving water for future generations, these three categories of water when used in an integrated management plan can lower energy costs, recycle nutrients and increase water security. They are:i. Blue water: refers to surface and groundwater in lakes, rivers, reservoirs and aquifers. In terms of importance to humans, blue water is the most vital for drinking purposes, water for homes and businesses and for irrigation. Agricultural irrigation uses 70 percent of the blue water in the world. In the Caribbean, the primary source of blue water is precipitation which feeds all sources of ground and surface water resources. An increasing demand for food results in a heavy dependence on blue water. This situation is further worsened by over-abstraction and increased discharge of pollutants into groundwater and surface water resources thereby decreasing the fresh water quality and quantity in the region's watersheds and coastal zones. Urban expansion that results in paving of the ground surface also affects the recharge of blue water and replenishment of ground water supplies.Pollution degrades the quality of surface and groundwater resources and climate change in the form of flash floods or droughts can also threaten both water and food security within the region. Water management that is sustainable must therefore employ practices that increase the storage of blue water, protect blue water from pollutants, increase groundwater recharge and increase water security by integrating green and grey water resources into the water supply chain. Some of the practices are discussed below.ii. Green water: this is the water available in the soil for plants and soil microorganisms. 90 percent of the water used by plants is green water. Green water sustains terrestrial ecosystems. Through the processes of transpiration, evaporation and surface run-off, green water is lost. Green water, however, is only considered productive for plants when it increases plant growth and crop yield.While only 15-30 percent of water is used for transpiration, a greater amount is lost (30-50 percent) via evaporation and 10-25 percent as run-off. Sustainable water management to prevent green water loss must therefore include soil and water conservation practices. Increasing plant water use efficiency can also help reduce water loss by increasing the productive use of green water, decreasing evaporation and increasing the rate of transpiration. By better utilizing available water, resources can be secured for increased crop production thereby reducing the strain on blue water. Sustainable soil water conservation practices that minimize soil water loss are discussed in the following section.iii. Grey water: can be described as treated wastewater and may contain impurities.It is used mainly for cities, households and industries. Waste water is largely produced by households and industries. The amount of waste water increases as the population grows; according to United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), in 2025 wastewater inflows can amount to 52 trillion gallons per day (Schneider 2013). The use of grey water saves blue water and creates more green water for plants as well as providing other benefits such as nutrient recycling. Great care, however, is needed when using grey water to avoid salinization or other environmental problems. Permits regulating the use of grey water are therefore necessary to avoid environmental degradation. Sustainable practices will involve encouraging household water conservation by using grey water for washing, bathing, to water gardens and for livestock purposes.| 181Sustainable Water Management Practices for Food Production in the CaribbeanHarvesting and storage of rainwater is an important practice which ensures water security particularly in the Caribbean region where there is an abundance of rainfall but concentrated between June to December. Rainwater harvesting can be described as the accumulation and deposition of rainwater before it reaches aquifers or other forms of ground and surface storage. Some of its uses within the Caribbean generally include water for plants, livestock, irrigation, drinking water. Efficient harvesting and storage of rainwater is a sustainable water management practice that provides an independent water supply that often supplements the main supply. This practice should be promoted in the Caribbean to augment existing supplies. The advantages of rain water harvesting is that it can provide water during periods of dry spells, reduce flooding in low lying areas, replenish groundwater and surface water storage, and is an excellent source of uncontaminated water that does not contain fluoride, chlorine or dissolved salts, minerals and chemicals (CEHI 2009).Within the Caribbean, rainwater harvesting is mostly done through the roof catchment, where the size of the roof and tank must be large enough to maintain adequate flow and storage. The size of the rainwater system is usually set up to meet the individual farmer's demand or household demand throughout the dry season. Apart from rooftop harvesting, the use of contour bunding, gully plugging, and check dams and dykes to catch rainwater can also be efficient ways of sustainable water management. In many of the drier Caribbean islands such as the Grenadines, the Virgin Islands and the Bahamas, with annual rainfall of <1500 mm, free-flowing water is scarce. As a result rain water harvesting remains the main source to meet water needs. Due to seasonality of rainfall, rainwater harvesting is also an attractive low-cost option to meet shortfalls in water supplies during dry months even in the wetter islands (i.e. >2500 mm per annum of rainfall). CEHI (2009) provides a comprehensive overview of typical rainwater harvesting systems found in the Caribbean. According to CEHI (2009) the typical rain harvesting system comprises four main parts: 1 • Catchment area: usually a roof surface or pavement with applications that can range from agricultural or commercial uses with large water requirements.• Conveyance system: this is a network of guttering and pipes to transfer the rainwater from the catchment to the storage tank.• Storage device: This is usually a tank situated above, underneath or partially below the ground.• Distribution system: this ranges from a simple container to extract the water from the storage tank, or a pipe functioning solely as an outlet or a complex network of pipes serving multiple users. The distribution of the water can be assisted by using a pump.Recycling of drainage water can be described as the storing of run-off water from agricultural farms and after heavy rainfall for reuse as irrigated water into these farms. The water collected passes through a controlled irrigation system. This system requires a suitable area for the collection and storage of run-off and rain water. The advantages of this system are that it returns nutrients to the soil, a positive economic benefit, and it also supplements the use of fresh water, which is becoming more limited. Care must be taken to ensure that the quality of drainage water is good enough to prevent contamination of the soil and ground water supplies.The use of effluent and wastewater can be described as the recycling of water previously used by industries and households. This water includes sewage effluent, storm water runoff, and industrial discharges (OAS 1997). Water recycling has created a new and reliable source of water without compromising environmental, public health or agricultural resources. The advantages of using recycled water are that it provides an additional source of water, it reduces the diversion of water from river and wetland ecosystems, it decreases wastewater discharge into waterways and it can be used as irrigation water for agriculture. Effluent and waste water must be treated adequately to ensure water quality is appropriate for the intended purpose. Effluent can pose environmental, public health or agricultural resource risks if not managed appropriately. Urbanization and industrial development have led to the production of large amounts of wastewater in the Caribbean. The integration of this grey water into the water supply chain will help alleviate the water woes of the Caribbean. Countries around the world have included treated wastewater to supplement their waterSustainable Water Management Practices for Food Production in the Caribbean supply particularly for agricultural and industrial purposes. Although in some countries wastewater has been treated to drinking standards, public health, religious and cultural concerns among consumers poses a hindrance to this use of wastewater.Essentially in the Caribbean, wastewater reuse has been restricted to irrigation and industrial applications. Wastewater treatment effluent in Jamaica has been used for golf course irrigation, in some hotels and for the industry, as in the case of extensive recycling in the bauxite/alumina companies. In Barbados and Curaçao, extended aeration sewage treatment plants supplies water for lawn irrigation and hotel use. Large-scale wastewater treatment plants in Trinidad and Tobago have been used to treat wastewater to industrial standard for industrial use. For instance, the severe drought in 2009/2010 in Trinidad and Tobago left the Water and Sewage Authority (WASA) with no option but to significantly reduce supply to industries to meet the need for domestic use. As a result treatment plants like the Beetham Wastewater Treatment Plant have been used to supply water to the Point Lisas Industrial Estate, Trinidad. Also in Trinidad, river water fed by wastewater treatment plants is actively used by farmers to irrigate crops in areas like Caroni (Central Trinidad) and Maloney (East Trinidad). However, in order to expand the irrigated acreage to attain food security, large-scale treatment plants must treat grey water to agricultural standards in Trinidad.Water conservation systems are necessary tools in light of a growing population and changing climate. These systems are essential for the Caribbean region to ensure viability of its agricultural sector. Water conservation systems involve the preparation of fields for efficient water use, for example, conservation tillage, scheduling irrigation and efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation. The advantages of water conservation systems are that they help to preserve the quality of water, reduce or eliminate drainage problems, conserve energy, increase food production and save money.One of the ways to ensure sustainable water management is to increase the efficiency of irrigation systems. Irrigated agriculture uses 60-70 percent of fresh water resources globally. With population growth, competing demands and climate change impacts, available water resources will become scarcer, therefore more emphasis must be given to efficient use of irrigation water for maximum economic return and water resources sustainability. Irrigation efficiency requires that appropriate methods of measuring and evaluating how effectively water extracted from a water source is used in crop production. It avoids crop water stress and yield reduction from inadequate irrigation application and also the pollution of water sources from the loss of plant nutrients through leaching, runoff, and soil erosion due to excess irrigation application.Increasing irrigation efficiency helps to get 'more crop per drop of water' (Kranz 2013). Surface irrigation which constitutes about 90 percent of irrigated agriculture is poorly controlled and does not result in uniform distribution of water to the field, leading to heavy water wastage. Pressurized irrigation facilities that ensure uniform distribution of water in the field, result in less wastage. Drip (micro) irrigation is highly efficient, as almost every drop of water from the source can reach the root system with minimum water losses. Drip irrigation is the process whereby small amounts of water are frequently dripped onto the soil area surrounding the plant roots through tubing with built in emitters. This system allows for a carefully managed amount of water to be applied, thereby avoiding deep percolation and run-off. The advantages of drip irrigation is that it reduces salt build up, plant stress, farm operations and maintenance costs, increases crop yield and enables efficient water use on steep slopes.Enhanced surface water storage within the Caribbean usually takes the form of damming and water catchment. Examples of where this was successful are the Roseau Dam in St Lucia, which is also the last relatively large water catchment project in the Caribbean. Enhancing the surface water catchment does not only take into consideration its size but also the number of water catchment facilities that are able to improve the water quality supply of the country. Recently, the Government of Trinidad and Tobago constructed over three hundred (300) on-farm irrigation rain-fed ponds to serve as an incentive to increase irrigated acreage and encourage agricultural production to meet the food needs of the nation.Saline water intrusion into fresh surface water and groundwater systems can decrease the quality of fresh water resources for drinking and agriculture. It can also increase the area of marginal unsuitable lands for agriculture. Therefore, measures to curb saline water intrusion can result in sustainable supply of fresh water from surface and groundwater sources, and can sustain the agricultural productivity of wetlands. In the Caribbean, sluice gates have been used to regulate the flow of salt water at high tides into river channels and adjoining wetlands, thereby protecting the sensitive wetland ecosystem and surface and groundwater resources. Sluice gates efficiently drain upstream lands, preventing saline water intrusion and back flooding during high tides. The use of sluice gates therefore prevents the conversion of fresh water systems into saline/brackish systems.Sustainable Water Management Practices for Food Production in the CaribbeanSoil and water conservation methods help in increasing the amount of green water for crop production and ecosystem diversity and protect surface and groundwater resources from pollution hazards. Some soil and water conservation practices that are relevant to sustainable water management in the Caribbean are already discussed elsewhere (Wuddivira and Atwell 2012). Soil conservation practices include: i. Cover cropping: an effective method of soil and water conservation, which decreases water loss from the soil surface and increases the quantity and quality of green water. Cover crops protect the soil from the elements of soil erosion and evaporation. They therefore prevent soil erosion and runoff and encourage water to soak into the soil instead of running off the surface. Cover crops also increase soil organic matter content which improves and maintains soil fertility, conservation of soil moisture and soil structural stability. Cover crops capture, recycle and promote nutrients in the soil profile, suppress weeds and improve soil quality and thus greatly influence water storage and use.ii. Conservational tillage: a soil and water conservation system that promotes reduced frequency of tillage and the retention of crop residue at, or near the soil surface. This practice significantly alleviates soil susceptibility to erosion under intense rainfall. Crop residues retained at or near the soil surface usually dissipate raindrop energy by providing surface protection against the direct impact of the raindrops. This minimizes aggregate breakdown and surface sealing and retards surface water flow, thus providing more time for infiltration into the soil.iii. Mulching: soil and water conservation are achieved by using or applying a layer of plant residues or other suitable material on the soil surface. Instead of leaving the soil in between crop stands unprotected; residues are applied as mulch on the soil surface to enhance soil water infiltration and storage. This is achieved by stabilizing the soil temperature and moisture, and preventing sunlight from germinating weed seeds. Mulches also warm the soil by helping it retain heat that is lost during the night, and additionally minimise the effect of soil erosion, runoff, aggregate slaking forces and raindrop impact by improving soil structure.Mulching protects the soil surface from direct impact of weather elements such as the sun thereby reducing evaporation. In an environment like ours, characterised by intense and energetic rainfall, a layer of residue on the soil surface acts as an \"impact absorber\", reducing direct hitting of the soil by raindrops. Mulches also modify temperature and moisture regimes thereby increasing the activity of soil fauna and flora, and suppressing weed growth.iv. Crop rotation: under a continuous cropping management system, soil and water conservation are achieved by growing crops in a planned sequence on the same field. This planned sequence of growing crops is referred to as crop rotation. A crop rotation system that includes the rotation of annual crops with grasses and legumes, improves soil structure, reduces erosion and increases soil fertility. The benefits of crop rotation include the improvement of soil structural stability, the reduction of erosion, improvement and maintenance of soil fertility, reduction of the build-up of pests, reduction of the risk of weather damage and reduction in the reliance on agricultural chemicals. These promote green water storage and the quality of surface and groundwater resources.v. Conservation vegetative barriers: the use of vegetative barriers as a soil and water conservation practice involves planting strips of rigid, dense vegetation mostly of bunchgrass and shrubs on the contour. Vegetative barriers drastically reduce runoff velocity and thus prevent potential pollutants from running off into surface waters. In addition, vegetative barriers control overland water flow, trap sediments and reduce pollution in the surrounding environments.vi. Contour farming: this is a good conservation practice for water management on sloping lands. It involves carrying out farming practices such as ploughing, ridging, planting, cultivating, fertilizer application and harvesting across the slope rather than along the slope. The contour farming practice slows down runoff and increases the detention time of water on the slope, thereby allowing more water to soak (infiltrate) into the soil. When more water infiltrates, sheet and rill erosion are reduced. Reduction in erosion means reduction in the transport of sediments, other solids and associated contaminants to the surrounding environment. Therefore, contour farming conserves soil, water and ensures the preservation of environmental quality.Many sectors in the Caribbean are affected by water scarcity. Inappropriate water management practices, climate change and climate variability impacts, increase rates of abstraction, pollution from agro-chemicals and other contaminants, inefficient and inadequate water storage facilities, failure to exploit recycling technologies and implement water-use efficiency measures all compound water scarcity problem of the region (Farrell et al. 2007). This will go unabated unless by-laws are put in place to deal with water wastage and discharge of pollutants into water bodies.Sustainable Water Management Practices for Food Production in the Caribbean Currently, policies and legislation for water management are either inadequate or non-existent in the Caribbean. However, legislation is in place in countries like Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados for compulsory rainwater harvesting and storage from new buildings with large floor size (Ekwue 2010). Trinidad and Tobago has developed ad-hoc laws to legislate on water use in times of scarcity during unusually long dry spells. Urgent legislation is however required in the Caribbean to protect water resources from misuse and pollutant discharge. 2To achieve sustainable water management in the Caribbean public education on water conservation is essential. Strategies on how to save water from wastage and protect degradation of water quality can be incorporated into posters, leaflets, print and electronic media for the public to read and adopt. Information on proper and efficient irrigation systems, frequency of watering and mulching will go a long way in empowering the public to use water sustainably.In the Caribbean, there is a preponderance of poorly-drained soils due to heavy clay textures, low elevation, flat landscape, and the presence of a restrictive layer beneath the root zone. With above-average sea-surface temperatures, rainy seasons are expected to be wetter, with waterlogging problems hampering food production. Waterlogging interrupts seeding and germination, increased incidences of crop diseases and increased cost of tillage implements and production. Under waterlogging conditions, farmers must plant crops on raised beds to create a zone of unsaturated soil volume for optimal root growth. This will reduce the harmful effects of waterlogging on crop productivity. Effective water management is also required for profitable crop production, and should include the drainage of the excess soil water from the root zone in these poorly drained soils. Therefore, fields that are prone to water settling will benefit from drains that are dug to move excess water to lower lying areas away from the root zone. Drainage removes excess water and improves the supply of oxygen at the root zone for beneficial microbial activities as well as plant roots growth (Boman and Tucker 2012).In fields with restrictive layers and those prone to waterlogging, the water table level should be monitored to maintain it at an optimal zone for crop production (Boman and Tucker 2012). There are many devices for monitoring the water table ranging from a 2.Note: there is water quality legislation in some islands.ruler to electronic sensors. The selection of which device to use should be guided by the level of accuracy required. To deal with waterlogging problems, surface and subsurface drainage will be required in the poorly-drained soils of the Caribbean. Drainage systems to be employed should consist of canals, retention areas, detention areas, open ditches, subsurface drains, beds, water furrows, swales, and pumps to remove the excess water. For the drainage systems to remain effective, proper maintenance must be employed to ensure that the prolonged exposure of roots to waterlogged soils under intense tropical rainfall is avoided. For successful productivity of poorly drained soils, the design of the drainage systems should be such that it permits a daily drop of the water table to between 10 and 15 cm (Boman and Tucker 2012). This will create an optimal zone of unsaturated soil volume sufficient to prevent root damage.To successfully surmount bad drainage, effective land reclamation, design and installation of adequate water management systems, effective drainage and irrigation systems as well as land layouts that use cambered beds is necessary. The beds can vary in width from 3m to 20m, depending upon the crops to be grown (Ahmad 2011). Ridges that are individually used or constructed on top of already cambered beds are also important to overcome waterlogging problems. These practices have proved successful in those cultural production systems involving sugarcane, in Caribbean countries like Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago. Also growing of crops that are tolerant to poor soil aeration such as dasheen (Colocasia esculenta) is an important practice.Livestock production is a vital agriculture sub-sector in the Caribbean. Production and consumption of animal products increases at about 2.5-4 percent per year in developing countries, and 0.5 percent per year in developed ones. Livestock production systems sustain the lives of four billion people globally, of which 32 percent are poor and 13 percent poor livestock keepers. Livestock production systems are heavily reliant on water for feed production, general maintenance and the production of animal products. It has been estimated that one litre of milk requires 3,000 litres of water (Times of India 2004), while producing one kilogram of grain fed beef requires about 100,000 litres of water (Pimental 2000). Compared to the production of potatoes, which only uses 500 litres, it takes much more water to produce animal products than crops. As a result, the sustainable utilization of water within the livestock industry is necessary in the face of uncertain water sources and variable weather patterns. Some sustainable water management practices that will be beneficial in the Caribbean include:| 189 Sustainable Water Management Practices for Food Production in the Caribbean• Feed sourcing and management: involving the utilisation of feeds with a low water cost of production. The effective use of food-feed crops decreases the water cost of production. For example, crop residues for livestock feeding and importation of feed places no additional demand for water.• Production-enhancing strategies such as veterinary care, provision of appropriate nutrients and a stress free environment limits the need to use water on sick or dying animals and increases livestock water productivity. By using these strategies one can maximise the benefits derived from animal production per unit volume of water depleted.• Water conserving strategies help to shift evaporation to transpiration, by the implementation of better pasture management in the form of sustainable stocking rates, rehabilitation of degraded areas, replenishing soil fertility and maintaining a critical mass of live biomass. These help to increase livestock water production by fostering higher transpiration rates, encouraging infiltration of rainwater and reducing water contamination by sediments and zoonotic pathogens.• Spatial and temporal distribution of livestock, drinking water and feed resources will improve livestock water productivity. Low to moderate livestock stocking densities and rotational grazing decrease cumulative grazing pressure, soil compaction and decrease the risk of damage to vegetation. Animal movements should be adapted and supplementary feeders and supply of drinking water for livestock should be positioned accordingly to avoid excessive soil compaction. This will reduce soil erosion, runoff volumes and evaporation improving soil water retention and reducing environmental pollution.• Protection of water courses: livestock should be prevented from direct access to surface water at any time. Water courses should be fenced off in fields away from livestock. Grazing of environmentally sensitive areas as well as areas with concentrated livestock wastes should be properly managed. Areas where waste is collected should not be on permeable soils to avoid nitrate and bacterial contamination from leaching into the ground or surface water. Waste collection areas should be located further than 30 m away from waterways and streams and should be regularly cleaned.• Minimising and reducing water spillage and contamination: when rearing livestock intensively, a formal wastewater management plan should be put in place to prevent potential sources of water pollution in storage areas. The installation of stock drinkers for livestock is also important to avoid water spillage.• Promoting water use efficiency and reusing water whenever possible: water supply systems should be monitored using metering to allow for the rapid identification of inefficiencies in the water system. Breakages (e.g. in troughs or pipes) and leaks in livestock areas should be mended, and potential areas where water can be reused, sought. For example clean rainwater can be channelled and collected from roofs for livestock drinking, if there is no health risk.• Minimise water wastage by animals: consider alternative drinking water designs such as troughs, nipple and cup or bite-type drinkers in bowls as these can reduce the amount of water wasted by animals.In a changing Caribbean region with mounting demographic pressures and growing threats of water quality degradation, improving the security and resilience of water is vital for the provisioning of good quality water for drinking and agricultural production. Although endowed with an abundance of water resources, the year-round supply of fresh water remains an enormous challenge in the Caribbean. This challenge is worsened by strong competing sectoral demands. Over abstraction and increased pollution of fresh water resources decreases water quality and can exacerbate the scarcity of fresh, easily accessible water. While using our water resources, practices that ensure its continuous supply in adequate and safe amounts to meet the needs of the population for drinking and food production must be adopted.The adoption of appropriate sustainable water management strategies as suggested above is of paramount importance to meet the water needs and to ensure a water and food secure region. The realities of water quality degradation, increased frequency of extreme rainfall patterns, and dry spells are looming. To have a region that is water and food secure, coping with these threats will involve reducing our regional water footprints through these sustainable water management practices and other suitable treatments that protect our water resources and increase the quality and availability of surface and groundwater resources. A complex interrelationship exists between food production and the environment. The prevention and control of environmental risks associated with food production is important for the preservation of human health and communities within which they exist. Agriculturists, in addition to their struggle to increase food production efficiencies, must consider environmental preservation to make food production sustainable. The agri or agro environment can simply be defined as the interactional impacts of agricultural practices on the environment. Agricultural Environmental Management (AEM) must be given more importance as countries strive towards food security within the context of promoting sustainable agroecosystems. Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) must be employed to sustain the environment taking into consideration all dimensions of the agricultural production system. However, commitments to the management of agricultural environments must seek to not only include GAPs, but must go beyond and specifically address the associated food safety and environmental risk elements related to the food production and agro-processing sector.Agricultural intensification has further contributed to environmental degradation since primary production agriculture is known to affect every component of the environment: surface and ground water, agricultural and non-agricultural land surfaces, the atmosphere and biodiversity. The main agricultural pollutants include pesticides, fertilizers, animal waste products and untreated manure. There are intervention and preventative approaches that can go a long way in attempting to safeguard the environment from the negative impacts of food production. Environmental-friendly agriculture, through sustainable agricultural intensification efforts, will ensure minimal contamination and disturbance to the natural environment from farming Sustaining The Environment: Farm and Beyond the Farm and other agricultural related activities. The first step towards achieving agricultural sustainability would be to diagnose the impact of agricultural practices on the environment (Payraudeau and van der Werf 2005).This chapter focuses on several of the complex interrelationships that exist between food production and food safety within an environmental context. Additionally, the chapter will provide recommendations to reduce the adverse impacts of agro-environmental hazards and food safety considerations which have a direct impact on people and societies in the Caribbean. The sources of environmental impacts from crop (pesticides, toxicity and fertilizers) and animal production (housing and waste management), identification of the key sources of contamination within the food value chain, along with considerations to reduce food safety hazards, food safety regulations and food traceability systems are addressed.Non-point source (NPS) pollution refers to the contaminants found in surface and subsurface soil and water resources that are diffused in nature and cannot be traced to a point location. In contrast to industrial and sewage pollution, it is less toxic and does not have one specific source of origin. Although it is less toxic, it poses serious threat to the health of human beings and their community. NPS pollution is not concentrated within a specific area, but has a dispersed character. It can affect a water body from sources such as run-offs from agricultural areas draining into rivers. The run-off from agricultural areas may contain bacteria, nitrates, ammonia, pesticides, phosphorous, minerals and sediments. Chowdary et al. (2001) for example have suggested that agriculture is the largest contributor to nonpoint pollution to ground and surface water to the environment.From a chemical pollutant (man-made) perspective, the sources of non-point pollutants from crop production are seemingly more diverse than from livestock production. Livestock production on the other hand specifically contributes to non-point pollution contaminants from animal waste and from the slaughtering processes. These two (2) types of production systems however, have similar adverse impacts on land surfaces related to: over-cropping, improper land preparation, over-grazing and over-stocking. Figure 7.1 shows the possible sources of non-point pollutants from crop and livestock production systems.Non-point pollutants from the agriculture include the excessive use of fertilizers and improper fertilizer application; excessive use of pesticides, improper pesticide application and disposal of containers; sediments from hillsides which enter rivers and lakes, resulting from improper land preparation practices including deforestation and 'slash and burn' practices; and bacteria (faecal coliforms and Streptococci) from animal waste.• Insecticides used to spray animals for external parasites such as ticks. Large volumes of these are used in spray races and animal dips and are discarded into the environment after use• Detergents and disinfectants that are used in operations such as dairying.Eleftherohorinos ( 2008) pointed to the inappropriate use of pesticides which has resulted in adverse effects on non-target organisms (e.g. reduction of beneficial species populations); water contamination from mobile pesticides or from pesticide drift; air pollution from volatile pesticides; injury on non-target plants from herbicide drift; injury to rotational crops from herbicide residues left in the field; crop injury due to high application rates, wrong application timing, or unfavourable environmental conditions at and after pesticide application. The reported impacts of pesticide exposure on human health include the development of cancers, tumours and lesions, disruption of immune and endocrine systems, reproductive impairment and congenital defects and are consequentially the result from long term pesticide exposure, bio-concentration (mechanisms by which pesticides concentrate in fat tissue) and bio-magnification (increase in pesticide concentration throughout the food chain).Positively charged chemical pesticide is attracted to negatively charged clay particles and organic matter.Runoff: the movement of water along a sloping surface.Volatilization: the conversation of a solid or liquid into a gas Leaching: the movement of the pesticide through the soil rather than over it Pesticide drifts: the unintentional airborne movement of droplets during pesticide application.Chemical degradation: the breakdown of the pesticide by non-living factors e.g. temperature, moisture, pH and the pesticide's chemical characteristics.Biological degradation by microorganisms. Photo-degradation: the breakdown of the pesticide by sunlight.Source: Fishel (2007)| 213Sustaining the Environment: Farm and Beyond the FarmThe fate processes of a pesticide when applied to the environment fall into three (3) categories; adsorption, transfer and degradation. What is critical however, is the interaction of each of these factors and their interplay with the particular soil type and environmental conditions that determines the pesticide behaviour within the environment. Table1 summaries the fate processes of pesticides in the environment and the mechanisms associated with the processes.The four major properties that are important to a pesticide's fate after application are: i. Vapour pressure (volatility): relates to the ability of a pesticide to be converted into a gas.ii. Adsorption: the process by which a pesticide is bound to or adsorped to soil or organic matter within the soil. When pesticides are adsorbed they are less likely to be leached.iii. Water solubility: the more soluble a pesticide is, the greater its mobility within the environment and it is less likely to be leached.iv. Persistence: or the length of time a pesticide remains active in the environment.It is a function of the chemical composition of the pesticide and the chemical and biological degradation processes, which break down the pesticide into a less harmful form.There are several conditions which will hasten the process by which pesticides volatize; these include soils of a sandy composition and hot, dry, windy conditions. The size of the droplets being emitted from the spraying equipment also determines the rate of volatilization: -the smaller the droplets, the greater the rate of volatilization. To therefore avoid the hot and windy conditions experienced during the day, it is recommended that volatile pesticides be sprayed late in the evening. The resultant loss of pesticide by this process will be considerably reduced, and there will be a long mode of action during the night time period into the sunrise.Pesticide toxicity can either be classified according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) or Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as shown in Table 7.2. The assignment of pesticides into toxicity classes will enable the applicator to assess the potential risk using the relationship:Based on the above formula, it can be seen that the level of risk can be predicted such that in the case of a very lethal pesticide, if there is very little exposure to the applicator or handler, the risk will not be great. On the other hand, pesticides of low toxicity with prolonged exposure, can pose a high level risk of harm to the applicator or handler.The pesticide drift is dependent on the size of the droplets exiting the nozzle of the pesticide application equipment, the wind velocity and the distance between the point of exit from the equipment and target. The greater the distance from the point of exit to the target, the more likely is the potential for pesticide drift. In knapsack sprayers, the pressure of the spray exiting the tank has an impact on the size of the droplets.The risk of pesticide contamination to ground water contamination is based on the solubility of the pesticide, level of adsorption, degree of persistence, the amount of clay and organic matter present, the size of the pore spaces within the soil, depth of the ground water and the amount and frequency of rainfall and irrigation. Table 7.3 provides a summary of the ground water contamination potential as influenced by water, pesticides and soil characteristics. It should be noted that although botanical pesticides such as pyrethrins, extracted from chrysanthemum flowers are relatively non-toxic to mammals there are highly toxic to fish, tadpoles, aquatic invertebrates and honeys bees. Additionally, pyrethrins are unstable in sunlight and have a half-life of 12 days.Half-life is the amount of time it takes for ½ of the original material to be broken down or removed. For each additional half-life period, 50 percent of the remainder will be lost.Sustaining the Environment: Farm and Beyond the Farm Pesticides from agricultural and public health sources (eg. mosquito spraying programmes) will inevitably be leached into the environment. The following strategies can be used to reduce the entry of chemicals into the environment.The impact of pesticide entry can be reduced through careful examination of the pest life cycle and implementing an IPM approach, which places focus on knowing the pest's biological characteristics and monitoring the pest behaviour in order to advance a control strategy. The IPM approach uses one or more of the following methods; biological, cultural, mechanical and physical, and chemical control. IPM is used as a long-term approach for controlling, but not eradicating the pest. Chemical control methods are used last in the line of defence. labels for warnings regarding use near bodies of water such as streams, rivers, and lakes.Calculate the expected quantity of pesticide required before purchasing to avoid the need to store excess, or incur possible wastage. Empty pesticide bottles should be washed at least three times and the resulting water added to the application mixture. Do not burn pesticide packaging. Contact the relevant municipal authority or national waste management authority for information on the safe disposal of your pesticide packaging.Consider the soil texture, organic matter content, depth to ground water and slope of the site. Soil texture affects the movement of water and the movement of dissolved chemicals such as pesticides. The presence of organic matter will hold water and dissolved pesticides and within the root zone reducing the volume of runoff. The shallower the depth to groundwater, the less soil there will be available to act as a filter. The greater the slope's gradient, the greater the volume of runoff, leaving the pesticide application site. The retention of pesticides within the soil as opposed to runoff pesticides will enable degradation and adsorption processes to occur.Avoid applying pesticide (also fertilizers) when rainy conditions are forecasted, during rainfall, or when irrigation can influence runoff into surface water and leaching into ground water.7. Mixing: Carefully mix pesticides according to the rate specified on the label.8. Equipment: Maintain application equipment and calibrate accurately. 9. Buffer zone: Establish buffer zones to maintain a safe distance from wells and surface water (a minimum 15 m -30 m is recommended); do not apply pesticides in buffer zones.As a consequence of rapid population growth and industrialization, the amount of arable land available for farming is rapidly decreasing. Soils become depleted of nutrients from crop uptake, from harvesting which breaks the natural nutrient recycling, or through leaching and surface run-off. The use of fertilizers therefore has become more or less the accepted practice to ensure the realization of sustainable crop yield. It is also needed to replenish nutrient-depleted soil in order to maintain and enhance soil fertility to ensure food production.Sustaining the Environment: Farm and Beyond the Farm In addition to the need for the use of fertilizers in the agricultural sector, there is an inadvertent risk to the environment attributed to excessive fertilizer application. There has been a projected upward global trend in the use of fertilizers from seven percent per year (Pluncknett 1995), 3.8 percent annually between 1989/1990and 2010(Alexandratos 1998) and an expected nitrogen use to grow by 1.1 percent annually from 1990 to 2070 (Frink, Waggoner and Ausubel 1999). The improper use of fertilizers can have several deleterious impacts to the environment, including:1. Negative impacts on soil quality: The improper use of fertilizers can increase the soil acidity and impact the beneficial soil macro and microorganism.2. Negative impacts to water bodies: Excessive and improper use of fertilizers can cause eutrophication, or the process by which nutrients from sediments are carried by runoff water into surface waters providing nourishment for algae in the aquatic ecosystem (nitrates and phosphates). Where excessive plant growth in water bodies is attributed to human activities, it is known as cultural eutrophication, which is the primary environmental concern of surface water today (Yannawar and Bhosle 2013).The impact of fertilizer or manure application on the environment is dependent on the fertilizer source, the rate of application, the placement of the fertilizer and the timing of application. Bruulsema (2009) refers to this approach as the 4R nutrient stewardship concept, and underscores the importance of best practices, which require that a soil analysis is always done before implementing a fertilizer programme. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) are two critical fertilizer nutrients, which can adversely impact the quality of ground and surface water. In this regard, it is very important that these two nutrients are carefully managed in crop production activities.It will also be critical to know when to apply plant nutrients in order to optimize the benefits from the fertilizer application. The recommendation is that nitrogenous fertilizers be applied during the maximum growth phase of the plant, for them to be efficiently utilised. This will ensure that the fertilizer is efficiently used, and that less opportunity exists for residuals in the soil and loss from surface run-off or leaching. Split application of fertilizers will ensure minimum losses resulting from surface run-off and leaching, particularly in the case of nitrogen fertilizer management. Other methods, by which nitrogen fertilizers can be managed, include: the use of slow release fertilizers which can significantly reduce nitrogen losses, and the use of nitrification inhibitors which delay the microbiological transformation of ammonium to nitrates. Iron supplements can be used alone, or in combination with reduced nitrogen fertilizer to elicit a greening response, thereby reducing the amount of nitrogen leaching from crop production activities. Careful consideration must be given to the application of fertilizers on slopes as this must be kept to a minimum and always placed on the uphill side of the slope, shown as 'X' in Figure 7.2.The management of phosphorus loss from crop fields into waterways can be prevented by ensuring that it is applied at the recommended rate based on a soil test. The notion that high rates of phosphorus will not be injurious to plants, and as such can be applied in high rates to build up soil levels, is no longer an acceptable practice. Although phosphorus moves very little within the soil, soil erosion and run-off are processes that cause phosphorus pollution of water. The following approaches can be used to reduce phosphorus movement into runoff water: conservation tillage, terraces, contour farming, grasses way, vegetative filter strips, and cover crops. Strips of unfertilized grass or natural vegetation near water channels or water bodies can assist in reducing soil erosion, and behave as a trap for unwanted nutrients, thereby preventing any deleterious impacts to the environment. Grass barriers are narrow strips (approximately 1.2 m) of tall, erect, stiff-stemmed, native warm-season perennial grasses planted on the field contour (Kemper et al. 1992). Grass barriers and strips have proven to be economical means to:i. Reduce run-off and promote infiltration (Meyer, Dabney and Harmon 1995) ii. Enhance deposition of soil and organic matter ( Melville and Morgan 2001) iii. Promote degradation of sediment-bound chemicals (Groffman et al. 1991) | 219Sustaining the Environment: Farm and Beyond the FarmThe misconception also appears to exist, that organic fertilizers such as manures cannot be detrimental to the environment when in fact, manure application to crop lands contributes significantly to both nitrogen and phosphorus-loaded run-off into streams, rivers and lakes. Figure 7.3 shows algal growth attributed to nutrient rich run-off from animal waste. Additionally, there is a belief that increasing fertilizer use can increase yield. This occurs up to a point, beyond which, any further increase in fertilizer application will not be effective, resulting in economic losses and environmental harm.World population growth along with demographic factors such as age, structure and urbanization has influenced the demand for livestock food products tremendously. In addition to this, economic growth and a concomitant increase in individual incomes and by extension the standard of living, have also contributed to a shift in dietary choices and a subsequent increase in the demand for animal products. The livestock sector has responded to this increase in demand by improving production efficiencies via strategic changes in animal breeding and genetics, reproduction, nutrition, animal health care and housing. These controlled modifications have led to the intensive model of livestock production.Animal production systems may be broadly categorized as being either intensive or extensive, however it must be noted that some systems show features of both categories and are hence categorized as semi-intensive. Intensification, as it relates to animal production, may be defined as the rearing of many animals in a single location in close proximity to each other. The drastic increase in animal population densities associated with intensification usually result in attending problems associated with the animals' requirement for nutrition and feeding, health and environmental management. In the regional context, because of the relatively small size of states, competing interests for land use, praedial larceny, hilly topography and the need to control the environment for animal production exist, resulting in many of our livestock production systems moving towards the adoption of intensive systems for production. Examples of intensive systems used in the region are:i. Large tunnel ventilated houses for broiler production (with bird density of less than 0.09 m 2 per bird), which utilises the deep litter system of production.ii. Open side naturally ventilated houses for broiler production using the deep litter system.iii. Slatted floor and deep litter systems for small ruminant (sheep and goats) production.iv. Feedlot systems for cattle and water buffalo production.v. Intensive swine production facilities.The term industrial farm animal production (IFAP) has been used by Halden and Schwab (2010), to describe this type of intensive production on a very large scale in some developed countries. Specifically for the Caribbean, two key features of intensive systems are found, involving the use of relatively small land areas, resulting in high animal to land ratio and the use of housing structures and equipment designed to:• protect the animal from the environment and predators• ensure timely and controlled supply of feed nutrients and water• exclude disease causing organisms and prevent spread of diseases• facilitate the easy handling of animals• facilitate timely and efficient removal of wasteThe biggest environmental concern with respect to intensive systems, is the timely removal and safe disposal of animal waste. Conversely, within extensive animal production systems, animals are not kept in close proximity to each other and animal production densities are comparatively low. The term range operation is often used to describe the release of animals on large expanses of land where they have to seek their own food and water supplies. Within this type of system, land degradation from overgrazing constitutes a major environmental concern.In general, animal production operations impact the environment (water, soil and air) due to the large volume of animal waste produced. In situations where there is a lack of adequate regulations and monitoring policies to reduce the incidence of pollution, the environment is negatively impacted. The major effects are as follows:1. Nutrient pollution of ground and surface water resources from inappropriate management of animal waste (manure).2. Contamination and pollution of ground and surface water resources by the various chemicals used in animal husbandry.3. Contamination of ground and surface water resources with microorganisms.4. Overuse of fresh water resources leading to depletion.5. Degradation of land from overgrazing.6. Production and release of odorous gases and toxic substances.7. Release of particulates and bio-aerosols containing pathogens into the atmosphere.8. Consumption of non-renewable energy for feed production and transport.Sustaining the Environment: Farm and Beyond the FarmAnimal production produces much more waste than the amount produced by humans. Notwithstanding this, animal waste is less strictly regulated in terms of its management and disposal. In the past, with traditional extensive systems, manure did not present as much of an environmental problem as it now does, due to much lower animal populations, lower stocking densities and correspondingly, lower animal manure output. As a consequence, the natural cleansing systems found in many ecosystems were not overburdened.It is essential that the waste disposal from livestock production is carefully managed to prevent harmful impacts on human health, water quality, air quality and soil properties. Large volumes of both solid and liquid waste (Figure 7.4) are produced from animal feeding lots, the major fraction of which is manure, but the waste also contain many chemicals used in modern animal husbandry.Overgrazing is considered to be the major cause of soil degradation worldwide (Oldemann, Hakkeling and Sombroek 1991), accounting for 35.8 percent of all forms of degradation. Land degradation refers to those processes that render the land no longer useful for agricultural purposes due to deterioration in quality. Grazing livestock can alter and damage the ecosystem of the lands they graze. Overgrazing of an area can lead to insufficient time for grass regeneration, resulting in soil depletion, erosion and desertification. Overgrazing is a function of time and not necessarily a function of animal numbers on a specific area of grazing land. Farmers have moved to reduce overgrazing by rotating livestock in different pastures to allow plant growth to continue. However, this is not always carried out for long enough periods to enable the soil to fully recover. Animals should not be turned out to the pastures before the plants have fully recovered. In many of the Caribbean territories where the extensive/semi-extensive system of production is practiced, the limited acreage of available land for livestock production and the nature of the terrain of available lands often lead to overgrazing and soil erosion. This occurs as the animals are left in a single pasture for an extended period of time. In many situations, small ruminants such as sheep will graze so close to the ground that the soil is left exposed. To prevent the negative effects of overgrazing, the following should be integrated into livestock production systems. These include: land and soil management (e.g. pasture rotation and fertility management), animal management (e.g. managing animal distribution and their proximity to water supply), and strategic marketing to avoid overpopulation of herds/flocks and to reduce herd/flock size in times when forage availability is low e.g. in the dry season. Table 7.4 provides the commonly used stocking densities for livestock and poultry production in the region. Agriculture is the largest consumer of fresh water, accounting for 70 percent of total fresh water use (Steinfeld et al. 2006). It also accounts for in excess of 90 percent of total water depletion rates. Some areas where water is specifically used in animal production include:• Drinking purposes -A large lactating dairy cow that is producing 35 l of milk per day will consume in excess of 120 l of water in hot dry conditions.• Washing and cleaning -a tremendous volume of fresh water is used in animal agriculture on a daily basis for washing and cleaning feedlot facilities, washing animals, and the managing of animal waste in the form of slurry. A classic example are the large commercial swine units, which often use flushing systems and where water consumption is often several times the drinking water needs.• Cooling of animals, facilities and products e.g. misting and drip cooling for animals, milk cooling facilities, etc.• Product processing -such as animal slaughtering and processing of meat and milk processing amongst others. In addition to slaughtering, water use in these facilities includes that which is used for offal processing and rendering.• Evapo-transpiration losses associated with livestock evapo-transpiration is the main mechanism by which crop and grassland deplete water resources (Steinfeld et al. 2006).Most of livestock's contribution to evapotranspiration losses is due to the production of corn and soybean. In the Caribbean region, the contribution to water depletion by this means is minimal, since little grain for feeding animals is produced, and pasture irrigation is carried out on a limited scale during the dry season. However, it must be noted that the region imports large volumes of corn and soybean meal which constitute 100 percent of the ration fed to monogastric animals (poultry and pigs in particular), and approximately 40 percent of the ration fed to ruminants. Therefore the regional contribution to the depletion of water resources in this way is indirect.Not all the nutrients consumed by the animal are digested, a considerable fraction is undigested and passed out in the excreta. Manure contains solid and liquid animal waste, much of this is returned to the environment when livestock facilities are cleaned. The manure contains a large volume of nutrients such as N, P and potassium (K). In addition to nutrients, drug residues, heavy metals and pathogens are also carried in animal waste and constitute a pollution concern. Contamination of water sources from animal waste usually stem from runoff from facilities directly in drainage systems, disposal in the waterways or watersheds, and from percolation through the soil and into water sources.The two nutrients of major concern are N and P, with P tending to be more of a problem with surface water quality and Nitrogen more of a problem with ground water quality when nitrate leaches through soil layers (Steinfeld et al. 2006). High concentrations of nutrients in these water resources contribute as previously stated, to eutrophication. Animal farming therefore markedly increases the quantity of nutrients reaching the water. When these nutrients enter the water systems, algal growth is stimulated and the clarity of the water is reduced. Algal blooms and resulting microbial activity exhaust the dissolved oxygen in the aquatic ecosystem and impairs the proper functioning of the ecosystem. The process of decomposition of the algae also utilizes oxygen which reduces the bioavailability for fish and other aquatic life. The end results are diverse, and in addition to damaging the functioning of the ecosystem, include:• A shift in habitat characteristics• Replacement of desirable species of fish with less desirable ones Nitrogen in manure may occur both in organic and inorganic forms. Depending on the form, it may be stored and immobilised within the soil, leached to ground water, or can be volatilized. Loses from excreta can take four main forms:1. Ammonia (NH 3 ) -volatilization of inorganic N from housing, storage or pasture.2. Dinitrogen (N 2 ) -nitrates are transformed to N 2 (harmless form).3. Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) -a harmful by-product produced under conditions of organic carbon deficiency.4. Nitrate (NO 3 ) -lost to water resources in this form as it is very mobile in soil solution and can easily enter ground water. High nitrate in water resources present health issues such as poisoning in infants (methemoglobinemia), and abortion and stomach cancer in adults. Steinfeld et al. (2006) identified five levels at which strategies to improve waste management should be targeted. These are at the:Sustaining the Environment: Farm and Beyond the Farm 1. Production level -the focus here is to increase feed use efficiency by the animal and reduce the quantity of excreta and hence the quantity of nutrients voided into the environment. Digestibility and therefore bioavailability of feed nutrients are two key components. Nutrition and feeding strategies strive to meet the nutrient needs of the animals without overfeeding so that there are minimal nutrients in the excreta. Animals that are overfed usually have lower levels of digestibility.Increasing feed efficiency can be accomplished by using a number of approaches including :Utilisation of feed ingredients with easily digested and absorbed nutrients e.g. low phytate corn. P excretion will be reduced as it is contained in phytate in a form that is not available to the animal.Not overfeeding, as this leads to excess nutrients such as minerals (macro and micro) being voided in the faeces. In addition, if protein is overfed, more N will be present in the urine.Utilisation of feed additives e.g. enzymes, to aid in improving digestibility and hence bioavailability of nutrients. One classical example of the application of this technology exist where much of the P in feed ingredients used for monogastric animals (pigs and poultry) exists in the phytate form. These animals do not have the enzyme phytase which will make the phytate-P available. Adding phytase to the diets of both pigs and poultry has been shown to significantly reduce P voided in the faeces, and hence result in an increase in the bioavailability of P in these feed ingredients.Pelleting feed to increase digestibility.Breeding and selection of animals with better feed efficiency and growth rates.Improving general environmental conditions and reducing the animal's exposure to stressors.2. Collection level -manure is usually collected in a relatively solid form (as it is produced by the animal), or in a more liquid form where water is added to bring it to a slurry. Adding water to it increases its volume due to the dilution process (LPES, 2005). In this state, it facilitates pollution from runoff. In general it is best to minimize the amount of water coming into contact with the manure to reduce the amount of run-off.3. Storage level -the aim of storage should be to reduce components of the manure escaping into the soil and water ways. Most of the storage systems utilized in the Caribbean involve collecting the waste and stockpiling it in an area on the farm where it is exposed to the climatic elements. In some production systems such as the slatted floor for sheep and goat production, manure is allowed to accumulate under the raised floors for extended periods (sometimes up to six months). The challenge is to keep the accumulated manure dry. This is unachievable in most instances, and the end result is a malodour associated with the breakdown of the manure and release of associated gases into the atmosphere along with runoff into drains and eventually into larger waterways. In addition to this, it often presents a suitable habitat for rodent infestation and proliferation.4. Processing level -options available for processing manure with an aim to reduce pollution include aeration technology, anaerobic digestion to reduce chemical oxygen demand, biological oxygen demand and produce methane gas, sedimentation of biosolids, flocculation, composting, drying of manure and lagooning systems favouring natural biological activity and reduced pollution.5. Utilisation level -when used as a fertilizer option for crop production, manure not only provides nutrients for plants but also improves soil characteristics such as soil structure, soil aeration, and water holding capacity, increases biological life in soils, improves cation exchange capacity, improves soil fertility and soil aggregate stability. Manure can also be used in the form of feed for fish and some other species to provide nutrients, although this may have some stigma attached to it. In many parts of the world manure is also used to produce energy in the form of methane gas that may be used in households on farms or in slaughter facilities.Manure may contain many pathogenic organisms and parasites which pose serious implications for human health. Many of these pathogens and parasites have a long residential time in the environment and lie dormant until conditions are favourable for their activation. Some of these pathogenic organisms associated with manure that has human health implications are: Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Clostridium spp., viruses (e.g. picornavirus, parvovirus, adenovirus, Rinderpest virus), protozoa and internal parasites.Hormones are other biochemical compounds that are commonly used in production enterprises as ear implants or as feed additives to control growth and metabolism. Some are also used in reproduction to control the oestrous cycle by inducing or synchronizing oestrus. Some of these hormones may be natural e.g. estradiol and progesterone, while others are synthetic e.g. zeranol, melengestrol acetate and trenbolone acetate. No direct implications on human health have been scientifically proven when they are used at the correct application rates. The concern however relates to the potential effect as endocrine disrupters in humans and wild life. Some of these synthetic hormones can remain in the environment for a very long time e.g. trenbolone acetate in manure piles and therefore can find their way into fresh water resources.Trace minerals are those required in the animal diet at levels lower than 0.01 percent in the ration, these include iron, copper, zinc, molybdenum, cobalt, iodine, manganese and selenium. Some of these are considered heavy metals and their improper use can lead to accumulation in soil and waterways in many ecosystems. In addition copper and zinc are commonly used in footbaths and as a disinfecting agent, and are routinely disposed of in the environment.Livestock production contributes significantly to soil erosion, not only leading to soil and fertility loss, but also to sediment loading of streams, rivers, lakes and marine ecosystems alike. Livestock contribution to soil erosion and sedimentation is a consequence of animal feed production and the improper management of the cultivated lands, as well as the impact of livestock hooves on the land and the effects of overgrazing on pastures. Animal hooves cause significant compaction of the soil in areas where they are concentrated such as feeding, shading and resting, grazing and watering areas. The impact of the hoof is twofold, whereby in the wet season the compaction effect is more pronounced, and in the dry season the surface of the compacted areas is loosened and the soil is carried away easily by the first heavy rains. Soil compaction in general will serve to reduce infiltration rates and consequently increase surface runoff, which is a major contributor to soil erosion. Steinfeld et al. (2006) summarised the sum total of the effects as follows:i. Reduced water holding capacity of the soil in the areas grazed and occupied by livestock Climate change and the global increase in average temperatures are often attributed to an increase in the production and release into the atmosphere of the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. Activities related to livestock production emit considerable amounts of these gases (18 percent of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions), and therefore contribute to climate change. The following provides approaches essential to addressing the reduction of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions into the environment from livestock production:1. Carbon dioxide emissions -it is essential that the environmental focus be specific in addressing issues of land degradation and land use change, which can be achieved by: Establishment of improved pastures and rotational grazing management.Reducing deforestation while intensifying agricultural production, i.e. the creation of incentives for forest conservation and reduced deforestation. This option will have to be supported by intensification of agricultural production to meet food security needs. This will involve the use of improved varieties (in terms of acclimatization, yield and disease resistance), better water management and increased fertilizer use, as the resulting decrease in carbon emission due to more forest conservation will outweigh the increased emissions due to more fertilizer use many times over.Restoring soil organic carbon to cultivated soils via the utilisation of conservation tillage options, agricultural intensification and erosion reduction.Using agroforestry options in livestock production.These can be reduced by:Improving the nutrition of the animal, as methane emissions from the rumen increase with poorer quality diets. Options include improving digestibility or the digestive process. Increasing the starch content in the diet also provides an option for more readily fermentable carbohydrates which will reduce methane production.Improved genetics, whereby animals with better feed conversion efficiencies and growth rate are available so that animal productivity increases.More advanced options that need additional evaluation include the reduction of hydrogen production in the rumen by stimulating acetogenic bacteria, eliminating certain protozoan from the rumen (defaunation), and vaccination to reduce methanogens.3. Methane production from the manure as anaerobically managed manure will result in methane release Proper balancing of feed will result in lower methane emissions as lower carbon to nitrogen ratios in feed lead to methane emissions.The storage temperature of manure is important as at lower storage temperatures the methane production is highly reduced.The use of biogas digesters where there is controlled anaerobic digestion of the manure in an enclosed environment, and the methane produced can be captured and utilized in the production framework or disposed of safely.4. Nitrous emissions and ammonia volatilisation through improving the efficiency with which nitrogen is used Balanced feeding -giving the animal its daily protein/amino acid needs and not overfeeding protein.Improved feeding practices such as grouping physiologically similar animals.The use of an enclosed tank during storage to prevent volatilisation.With grazing animals, avoid overgrazing and grazing animals on pastures with young lush forages that may have highly soluble nitrogen.Sustaining the Environment: Farm and Beyond the FarmOne-third of all food produced in the world is lost or wasted from farm to fork, according to estimates produced by the FAO (2011). This wastage not only has an enormous negative impact on the global economy and food availability, but it also has major environmental impacts. Recent studies suggest that the world will need 70 to 100 percent more food by 2050 (Godfray et al. 2010). According to the FAO ( 2001), food security is defined as 'a situation that exists when all people at all times have physical or economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life'. Additionally, an inherent assumption of food security is that food is nutritious and safe. Food production in developing countries can be severely affected by market interventions in the developed world, such as subsidies or price supports (Godfray et al. 2010). Such is the case in the Caribbean region where preferential access to EU markets for exports such as banana and sugar has been lost. The effects of climate change, as well as the harsh competition in world markets underscore the openness and vulnerability of small, trade-dependent economies. The Caribbean is one of the most food insecure regions in the western hemisphere and has a high dependence on imported food. Food and nutrition security and safety are now important items on political agendas in the Caribbean region. The region must seek to find sustainable solutions to the challenges in the food and agriculture sector, as well as its vulnerability to global trends in food safety.Food safety is a priority issue in agriculture, particularly in developing countries due to its linkage with food security and agricultural trade. The issue of genetically modified (GM) foods is also closely linked to food safety. Food safety is defined as 'providing assurance that food will not cause harm to the consumer when it is prepared and/or eaten according to its intended use (FAO 2001), while the WHO ( 2004) refers to it in terms of food-borne illness, and defines it as diseases, usually either infectious or toxic in nature, caused by agents that enter the body through the ingestion of food'. Food safety refers to the conditions and practices that ensure foods are protected from unintentional contamination, thus rendering them safe to eat. It is a function of the nature of technology used to produce and process food. As such, it can be manipulated through genetic improvement, agronomic practices and post-production storage and processing (FAO 2001).Food consumption all over the world is a mixture of imported agricultural products and domestic products making it difficult to find the contamination source in the case of a food scare. The globalization of the food production and the intensification of food trade enhance the risks associated with food safety (Polimeni, Iorgulescu and Bălan 2013). Food safety involves the implementation of several practices and strategies, aimed at avoiding the contamination of food, and the growth and proliferation of organisms, along the continuum of production to consumption or 'from farm to fork' (Figure 7.6). Contamination can occur at several points along this food value chain such as on the farm or in the field, at the slaughter house, during processing, during transportation, in traded products, and in the home.Management of food safety at the primary stage of production (i.e. the farm), is accomplished mainly through prevention of contamination as illustrated in Table 7.5. Onfarm food safety practices help producers reduce the potential for hazard contamination of crops, livestock, personnel (farm workers and other employees) and facilities. Such contamination could lead to risks for crop or livestock produce, product spoilage (reduction in quality and subsequently quantity) and human injury or illness (choking, infections, diseases, illnesses and death). Once a hazard of any kind has been identified, it is important to assess the risk of injury or harm.Failure to reduce food safety risks leads to an increasing strain on farm, and by extension, national economies, due to loss of productive work time, increasing cost of health care, costly surveillance programmes, loss of life, impact of vulnerable segments of the population (including children, aged persons and low income groups), impact on trade, and reduced food security. • Ensure soil is not acidic.• Ensure organic matter content is acceptable to stabilize heavy metals.• Avoidance of phosphate based fertilizers as they contain high contents of cadmium.• Establish records that indicated the date sampled, site sampled, tree sampled, water source sampled. All records must be signed by the relevant person at each stage throughout the sampling and testing procedures. All testing should be done at a certified laboratory. Analysis of soil pH, organic matter, heavy metal levels Analysis of water to determine that levels of heavy metals are within the acceptable range.• Ensure soil pH is not acidic.• Ensure organic matter content is acceptable to stabilize heavy metals.• Avoidance of phosphate based fertilizers as they contain high contents of cadmium.• Establish records to include date sampled, site sampled, tree sampled, water source sampled. All records must be signed by relevant persons at each stage throughout the sampling and testing procedures. All testing should be done at a certified laboratory. Contaminants, such as mycotoxins, veterinary drugs or dyes can be introduced into foods either as a result of their occurrence in the environment, natural infection by fungi, or other human activities. Other chemicals such as mercury, lead, cadmium, chloroform, benzene and polychlorinatedbiphenyls (PCBs) can get into the water supplies that are used to process foods. IPM, required by both domestic and export markets can bring about a reduction in chemical use and help in the protection of the environment. It involves the application of pesticides and herbicides only when necessary, preferring environment-friendly chemicals, and promoting the use of biological control and can be used in a variety of crops such as avocado, mango, pepper, tomato and citrus.Poor sanitation during each stage of the transport process greatly increases microbial contamination of fresh produce consumption of which, can result in food-borne illness. Most of the reported outbreaks have been associated with bacterial contamination, particularly members of the Enterobacteriaceae, followed by viruses, and then parasites. The most commonly recognized foodborne infections are caused by Campylobacter, Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7. The viruses involved in outbreaks have a human reservoir (e.g. Norwalk-like and Hepatitis A), and can be associated with products grown in contact with the soil and/or water. Outbreaks linked to protozoa (e.g. Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, Giardia) have been associated more with fruits than vegetables. Protozoa and viruses are most often associated with contaminated water or food handlers (European Commission 2002).Since no farmer or food manufacturer can guarantee neither food safety on their own, nor safety throughout the food value chain, certification standards such as Global GAP, HACCP and ISO 22000 play key roles in ensuring food safety. Global GAP focuses on the farming side of the value chain while the ISO 22000 and HACCP can be applied to every stage of the food value chain. Capacity building in the form of post-harvest extension and training programmes which include traceability and record keeping procedures are also components of these standards. Independent third parties or certification bodies can conduct audits of farms, organizations and suppliers along the entire value chain, and issue a certificate to confirm a successful audit. However, the acceptance of food safety standards and certification may vary from market to market.National food control systems are essential to protect the health and safety of domestic consumers, as without these, consumers can be susceptible to food borne illness outbreaks. They are also critical in enabling countries to assure the safety and quality of their foods entering international trade, and to ensure that imported foods conform to national requirements. The new global environment for food trade places considerable obligations on both importing and exporting countries to strengthen their food control systems and to implement and enforce risk-based food control strategies. In many countries, including the Caribbean islands, effective food control is undermined by the existence of fragmented legislation, multiple jurisdictions, and weaknesses in surveillance, monitoring and enforcement. Information exchange, technology transfer and capacity building are also critical strategies for food security in the Caribbean islands. In the absence of public standards (many of which have been adopted from the Codex Alimentarius Commission), farmers should be encouraged to apply voluntary standards such as Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) while manufacturers and food processors should adhere to current Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs). Farmers and food processors targeting export markets however, must ensure compliance with the laws of the exporting country and may be forced to adopt private standards to gain entry into the foreign markets. Governments, on the other hand must demonstrate the political will, through the provision of regulatory, financial, technical and infrastructural support mechanisms to assist farmers and food producers.In the case of Trinidad and Tobago, the annual food import bill in 2013 was estimated at TT$4 billion (approx.US$620.2 million). Imports of food and beverages into Trinidad and Tobago fall under the Food and Drugs Act of 1960. Additional laws for fish and fish products were incorporated into the Food and Drugs Act, while amendments were made for alcoholic beverages and other products. The Chemistry, Food and Drugs Division (CFDD) falls within the purview of the Ministry of Health, which also enforces some components of the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Act. Most of the food safety laws are outdated and while revisions have been made, many are still in the drafting stage, and have not been proclaimed into law. The Ministry of Food Production administers the laws regulating Plant and Animal controls. Table 7.6 illustrates the legislation under which food safety is monitored and enforced in Trinidad and Tobago.The regulatory climate is changing very rapidly, and regional countries need to ensure regulations are updated and enforced related to both the importation and exportation ofSustaining the Environment: Farm and Beyond the Farm food. The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) passed by congress in the USA on 4 January 2011, represented a significant event for the US Food and Drug Association (FDA). The FSMA allows the FDA to enforce more stringent compliance regulations and equips manufacturing and distribution companies with better response strategies to problems as they occur. Furthermore, the act extends to creating a uniform standard for imported foods to match those of domestically produced foods within the US. With limited exceptions, the rule would require domestic and foreign facilities that manufacture, process, pack, or hold human food to have written plans that identify hazards, specify the steps that will be put in place to minimize or prevent such hazards. In addition, manufacturers will be able to identify monitoring procedures, record monitoring results, and specify what actions should be taken to correct problems that arise. The FDA evaluates the plans developed, and continues to inspect the facilities to make sure the plans are being properly implemented. • Understanding the sanitary and phyto-sanitary requirements for the export markets and the application of non-chemical pest control practices are necessary to maintain food safety requirements.• There are no legal requirements for maximum residue levels (MRLs) of chemicals, traceability nor farm certification systems.• Limited efforts at capacity building in GAPs and farm registration are currently undertaken by the National Agricultural Marketing and Development Corporation (NAMDEVCO) in Trinidad.• Laboratory upgrade of infrastructure is required. • Update legislation on importation of animals and animal products.• Licensing and regulation of veterinarians is needed.• Training in the diagnosis of diseases related to animals, bees, etc.• Licensing requirements for the operation of bee hives, poultry depots, and livestock units.• Laboratory upgrade of infrastructure is necessary.Current gaps in existing legislation related to food safety • This will be superseded by the Fisheries Management Bill, 2011and provides a more controlled access to the fisheries resources of Trinidad and Tobago.• There is need to address the importation of live and processed fish and certification systems such as GMPs and HACCP.• Laboratory upgrade of infrastructure is required. • Public health inspectors do not have authority to close noncompliant plants nor retail markets.• No legislation with respect to levels of chemicals and mixtures of chemicals that farmers can use on crops.• No residue (MRLs) testing, nor penalties for use of banned chemicals.• No legislation for organic farming.Food traceability according to Alli (2012), can be defined as the identification of the origin, past or current location, condition and application of an item's known history throughout the supply chain, or the tracking of a food item forwards or backwards throughout the food supply chain from farm to table. Tracking (forward) is following the path of a traceable item through supply chain as it moves between parties. Tracing (back) is identifying the origin, attributes, or history of a traceable item located within the supply chain in order to improve food safety and reduce the potential of food recalls. Traceability systems from farm to fork should be implemented and some of the key steps in implementing such a system include: identifying key items that are traceable, determining for each item what details are required, developing a record keeping system, and developing an internal traceability programme. The benefits of such a system include:• compliance with best practices worldwide• risk reduction of unsafe foods to the consumer• consumer confidence (assurance that foods are safe and wholesome)• reduced costs, improved marketability and more competitive businesses both in local and foreign marketsSustaining the Environment: Farm and Beyond the Farm• decrease in food borne illnesses• faster recall of foods from the supply chain (production, processing, distribution, transport, retail and consumer).To remain competitive in today's global business environment a thorough understanding of all parts of the agri-food value chain is important (Devanney, 2006). However as value chains become sophisticated and vital to the competitiveness of many industries, this interlinked, global nature also makes them increasingly vulnerable to a range of risks. To ensure long-term food security under constantly changing agro-ecological and environmental conditions, considerations should be given to the implementation of sustainable agricultural practices such as:• plant genetic resources which are resilient to climate change and pests and diseases through genetic manipulation, for example, the insertion of a gene for herbicide resistance or another for resistance to pest-insect toxin.• identifying and developing alternatives to chemical methods for the control of postharvest pathogens and pests such as the reinforcement of host resistance, biological control and applications of physical treatments.• reducing risks associated with potential microbiological outbreaks of human pathogens that may reside on produce utilising novel methods to sanitise produce.• exporting sensitive produce by sea under controlled conditions in order to reduce environmental problems and costs associated with air transportation must be considered.• recycling of bio-waste for energy, feed and fertilizer can reduce the environmental impact.In the area of biotechnology, the next decade will see the development of combinations of desirable traits and the introduction of new traits such as drought tolerance for climate change mitigation effects. The production of cloned animals with engineered, innate immunity to diseases that reduce production efficiency will have the potential to reduce substantial losses arising from mortality and subclinical infections. Biotechnology could also be used to produce plants for animal feed with modified composition that increase the efficiency of meat production and lower methane emissions. While the use of biotechnology can lead to improved food safety through reducing pesticide use and improving postharvest quality of crops, the issue of trust and public acceptance of the technology has been highlighted in debates over the acceptance of genetic modification (GM) technologies. This technology may also pose health risks due to the possible transfer of toxins and allergens between species as GM involves germline modification of an organism and its introduction to the environment and food chain. Thus, a number of particular environmental and food safety issues will need to be assessed (for example FAO 2001;Godfray et al. 2010).Many effective options are available for reducing the polluting and degrading effect and food safety risks associated with agricultural production practices. An increase in education and awareness among food products is only one small aspect in the fight to mitigate agricultural pollution and food safety concerns. It is essential that environmental policies and relevant legislation be put in place to combat these existing problems. The policies and legislation must be in sync with the scientific and technical options, some of which are provided in this chapter for consideration. It is to be noted that many of the available options are associated with some direct costs, however these immediate cost should be viewed as an investment that will yield long-term benefits.Fresh fruits and vegetables undergo continuous changes throughout the supply chain, from the point of harvest until consumption. As such, the postharvest handling logistics of these commodities are different from those of other food products. Because of their living and perishable nature, fresh commodities are subject to biochemical and physiological changes resulting in deterioration over time as the commodity moves along the postharvest handling system (Figure 8.1).The quality of freshly harvested fruits and vegetables is determined by biological variations, environmental conditions, handling methods and sanitation practices. These parameters are further influenced by logistic activities such as the type of packaging, loading and unloading activities, availability of temperature controlled transport vehicles, storage facilities and the types of postharvest treatments that are implemented (Mazini and Accorsi 2013). While these postharvest activities cannot stop the rate of quality deterioration, they can impact the speed of quality loss by either slowing down the process via low, safe non-chilling temperature and high relative humidity, or speed it up by abusive handling whereby physical damages are incurred. Accordingly, the perception of product quality in the supply chain cannot be solely restricted to the properties of the commodity but also to the supply chain agents, processes and activities along the supply chain. Time and coordination are required to efficiently move perishable fruits and vegetables along the postharvest handling system, every delay can have negative quality consequences. In many countries, a high percentage of produce losses occur before fresh commodities reach the targeted consumers. Fonseca and Vergara (2014) estimated that postharvest losses can range from 37 percent for roots and tubers to 50 percent for fruit and vegetables. Such high losses compromise the income to producers and handlers, and eventually increase costs to consumers, thereby impacting household food security. Pullman and Zhaohui (2012) emphasised that in order to combat losses of horticultural commodities and their subsequent impact on the well-being of societies, efficient logistics systems need to be established to deliver the right product at the appropriate time. Logistics, according to Fonseca and Vergara (2014), are fundamental for horticultural products as their high perishability requires complex planning, including short-term decisions on transportation modes, handling, packaging and storage arrangements. To ensure fresh commodities do not become damaged or compromised throughout the postharvest handling system there must be a greater reliance on maintaining the cold chain. This involves the movement of temperature sensitive commodities along a supply chain through thermal and refrigerated packaging methods, and the logistical planning to protect the integrity of these perishable commodities. The cold chain therefore can be considered:• A science, because it requires an understanding of the chemical and biological processes linked with perishability.• A technology, since it relies on physical means to ensure appropriate temperature conditions along the supply chain.• A process, because of the series of tasks must be performed to prepare, store, transport and monitor commodities that are sensitive to chilling injury and heat injury.Appropriate Logistics to Reduce Losses in the Postharvest Handling System: Case of MangoIn Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), trade globalization has become a challenge for logistic operations in the fresh produce industry (Fonseca and Vergara 2014). Currently all LAC countries engage in importing some portion of the fresh produce they consume. While the USA is the dominant trading market for export commodities from LAC, it is also the largest hub for the re-shipping of consignments from and to other regions. For example, pineapples shipped from LAC to the Caribbean normally enter a seaport in USA, which means that LAC produce is in transit for long distances before getting to its final destination (Duran Lima and Lo Turco 2010). Unless logistics operations are optimized, long travelling distances increase the risk of low shelf life in imported produce when it arrives at the destination market (Fonseca and Vergara 2014). In LAC, the transformation of retail marketing of fresh produce has impacted on logistics as well. Development of supermarkets with distribution centres or market chains continue to grow, accounting for more share of the retail market for fresh produce in the region. Supermarkets and associated chain stores have adopted strict quality parameters which have ultimately created the need for improved logistics necessary to reduce losses during transit. At the same time, these high stringent quality standards have also influenced a higher risk of losses from rejections due to unacceptable quality (Lundqvist, De Fraiture and Molden 2008).The following is a list of limitations in logistic operations in LAC for which key interventions are required in order to address the problems associated with high postharvest losses: a. Inadequate infrastructure for proper coordination of postharvest activities, this is primarily due to underdeveloped secondary and tertiary roads often punctuated with potholes, slippery surfaces (especially in the wet season), and unpaved surfaces which lead to extensive physical damage such as abrasions, compressions, punctures, which create avenues for secondary infections. Adequate facilities to pre-cool, sort, grade, apply post-harvest treatments, along with storage and packaging, have also been found to be wanting. Levels of physical and pathological defects of mango fruits when subjected to grading requirement and tolerance are classified in Table 8.1.b. Limited information and communication technologies and their application -these also represent a major constraint to the growth and competiveness of the fresh produce industry throughout the region, particularly in rural areas. Mangoes must be of superior quality.They must be characteristic of the variety. They must be free of defects, with the exception of very slight superficial defects, provided these do not affect the general appearances of the fruit.5 percent by number of weight of mangoes not satisfying the requirements for the grade, but meeting those of Class I or exceptional, coming within the tolerances of that grade.Class IMangoes must be of good quality and characteristic of the variety. Mangoes may have the following slight defects, provided these do not affect the general appearance of the produce, the quality, the keeping quality and presentation in the package:-slight defects in shape; or -slight skin defects due to rubbing or sunburn, suberized stains due to resin exudation (elongated trails included) and healed bruises not exceeding 2,3,4,5 sq.cm. for size groups A, B, C, and D respectively 10 percent by number or weight of mangoes not satisfying the requirements for the grade, but meeting those of Class II grade or, exceptional, coming within the tolerances of that grade.The grade includes mangoes which do not qualify for inclusion in the higher grades, but satisfy the minimum requirements. Mangoes may have the following defects, provided they retain their essential characteristics as regards the quality, keeping quality and presentation: -defects in shape; or -slight skin defects due to rubbing or sunburn, suberized stains due to resin exudation (elongated trails included) and healed bruises not exceeding 4,5,6,7 sq. cm for size groups A, B, C, D respectively.10 percent by number or weight of mangoes not satisfying the requirements of the grade, but meeting the minimum requirements.| 247Appropriate Logistics to Reduce Losses in the Postharvest Handling System: Case of Mango c. Inadequate cold chain facilities -fresh produce demands proper temperature and relative humidity management in the entire logistic process. The development of telecommunication, information technology and information systems, especially the rise of wireless sensing technologies such as Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and wireless sensors, provide a feasible way to improve the safety and quality of cold chain facilities. Integrating RFID systems with conditionsmonitoring systems will also enhance existing track and trace applications, not only in terms of the location and movement history, but more importantly, as it relates to the condition of perishable commodities. Moreover, the availability of commodity-trace history data in combination with historical monitoring data can facilitate numerous decision-making processes.d. Lack of trained human capital -particularly to determine rejections arising from inappropriate harvesting and handling protocols due to overexposure of chilling sensitive commodities to extremely low temperatures, as well as the use of unsanitized water to wash and hydro-cool fruits and vegetables. Such problems can arise where there are untrained personnel working at different points in the postharvest handling system. Logistic service providers often lack sufficient knowledge in the postharvest handling of horticultural commodities. Further, many produce managers employed at supermarkets lack training in logistics concepts and procedures, which may in turn limit their ability to design appropriate solutions to store and transport commodities in an efficient manner (Rodriguez and Respetto 2013).A logistical system is composed of a number of elements which have to be managed properly in order to deliver final products in the right quantities at the right time and quality at the right place, and at a reasonable cost. This puts challenging requirements on the agro-food chain (Van der Vorst, Silva and Trienekens 2007) and there is need to make the specific logistics decision in order to meet customer expectations. For example, whilst temperature and relative humidity are critical factors affecting fruit quality (Kader, 2002), logistics decisions heavily determine these conditions by defining storage time and time of transporting perishable commodities (Luning and Marcelis 2007).All logistics activities are dependent on time-dependent product information obtained through quality control activities. Time-dependent quality information of product properties could assist in ensuring that products reach intended consumers before the development of defects. Thus, a higher level of integration of quality control and logistics control is required to predict incidences of fruit defects as well as to encourage exchange of quality information in the chain and the level of flexibility of the delivery systems to match specific consumer requirements. In underscoring the importance of quality control and logistics in the postharvest handling of fruit and vegetables, a detailed examination of these systems in mango will now follow.Varietal differences, growing regions, climatic conditions and agronomic practices influence the expression of fruit maturity in all commodities including mango, with the stage maturity at the time of harvest also being crucial to the eating quality of the ripe fruit (Figure 8.2 and 8.3). Therefore, selection of the appropriate mature fruit at harvest is based on several parameters such as fruit shape, peel colour, peel texture, flesh firmness, flesh colour development, soluble solids content and latex content. As such, it is important that mango producers validate those parameters that are most effective and dependable for their own conditions (Brecht 2010).Knowledge of the maturity indices of the particular cultivar will enable harvesters to determine the best time to harvest fruits. Logistical arrangements to speed up the harvesting process will depend on availability of harvest aids such as ladders, clippers, nets, and harvest baskets. While harvesting mangoes at the optimum stage of physiological maturity facilitates synchronised ripening, the use of the correct harvesting aids ensures minimal physical damage and lower postharvest losses.Protection of harvested fruits from exposure to direct sunlight while awaiting transport to packinghouses, which can vary from half an hour to six hours, is critical in order to maintain fruit quality. Direct exposure to sunlight for prolonged periods of more than six hours results in higher flesh temperatures, thereby increasing the rate of respiration, transpiration and ethylene production, all of which have the potential to shorten the shelf life.Latex exudation from mango stems at the time of harvest (Figure 8.4 ) can cause severe skin injury and staining, along with blister formation when fruits are subsequently ripened, resulting in unacceptable cosmetic appeal (Figure 8.4). Latex stains are aggravated when mangoes are exposed to heat and timely logistical procedures must be implemented to avoid this damage to fruits. To avoid latex damage of mango fruits in Brazil for example (Brecht 2010), mango producers train their harvesting crew to harvest mangoes with stemsAppropriate Logistics to Reduce Losses in the Postharvest Handling System: Case of Mango over 5 cm in length and immediately transport them to packinghouses where the stems are trimmed after 12-24 hours. This procedure ensures that latex drip would no longer occur even if the stem is clipped shorter. Other suggested methods include: de-sapping in a one percent solution of calcium hydroxide; washing fruit in one percent potassium sulphate; applying a surface coating to fruit prior to de-sapping; trimming and de-sapping at the packinghouse, followed by inversion on a stationary rack or a roller-conveyor; running below water or water and detergent sprays for 20 minutes (Yahia 2011).It is best to transport mangoes using trucks or pick-up vans that allow air circulation as the vehicle moves from the field to the packing house. To minimise physical damages (Figure 8.5), harvested fruits should be carefully placed in light coloured plastic crates that are stackable and well ventilated. Vehicle loads must be protected from sunlight by covering the top layers of mangoes with a light coloured tarpaulin. This will reduce respiration and water loss resulting in longer shelf-life. In some Caribbean islands the national marketing boards provide refrigerated transport from the field to packing houses for a small fee. Refrigerated transport would initiate pre-cooling and further reduce respiration and water loss once accompanied by a relative humidity of 90-95 percent.Alternatively, logistical arrangements to facilitate early morning, late evening or night time harvesting, loading and unloading operations and transport from field to packing house would also favour lower fruit temperatures that can better preserve the quality and shelf life of mango fruits. Equally important, is the need to have timely, well-coordinated schedules to allow for controlled quantities of mangoes to be delivered to the reception area at the packinghouse. If mango loads exceed the capacity of the reception lines then it will take a longer period for fruits to be unloaded on the reception lines. When mangoes, which have a climacteric pattern of respiration are exposed to high ambient temperatures are subjected to delays prior to unloading on packing lines, they would incur losses in quality due to accelerated respiration, ethylene production and transpiration rates. A smooth, timely flow of mango fruits from the field and rapid unloading onto reception lines requires logistical procedures to be programmed, monitored, controlled and expedited in an efficient manner.Optimizing the use of space in the packing house as well as the efficiency of resources on the mango reception line is critical for quality maintenance. A large unloading area would cater for more transport vehicles with fruits to be unloaded in a shorter time period. Packinghouses with large, open unloading areas have less traffic congestion and also provide protection of mango fruits against sunlight, and inadequate ventilation. They also make representative sampling and inspections for quarantine and quality control purposes more effective. Minimizing delays wherever possible is essential, as mango fruits are known to undergo rapid compositional changes in the hours following harvest (Brecht 2010).Major changes in total soluble solids (TSS) content, flesh firmness, skin and flesh colour can be manifested in mangoes as little as 24 hours after harvest. According to Brecht (2010), a 24-hour wait period prior to heat treatment of mango resulted in a reduction of heat injury symptoms. Furthermore, a time delay prior to heat treatment can be beneficial for low maturity mangoes. Average maturity, based on internal flesh colour, can be changed by one full stage in 24 hours under typical ambient temperatures, and TSS can increase by two to three percent, while flesh firmness decreases by two to five pounds force (lb/f ) according to Brecht (2010).Regular monitoring and application of sanitation protocols of packinghouse equipment and facilities must be implemented. Containers, packing line equipment (sorters, graders, dryers), refrigeration units, transport vehicles, forklifts and floors must be sanitised using a chlorine solution of 200 ppm between 25 and 43°C, and adjusted to a pH 7 with citric or acetic acid. Pets, rodents, birds and insects must be excluded from all areas.Temporary storage of mangoes in the shade prior to unloading on packing lines should be implemented. Fruits exposed to the sun in excess of 1 hour can be 14°C higher than fruits held in the shade, thereby resulting in heat injury. Likewise, flesh temperatures above 30°C for extended periods after harvest will result in poor ripening and flavour.Hot water treatment (HWT) is recommended for mango fruits as an effective postharvest treatment to minimise fruit fly damage and the fungal disease Anthracnose. There are specific requirements for successful hot water treatment of mangoes. Fruits are immersed in hot water at 46°C, with the time interval varying according to fruit shape and fruit weight. For example, mangoes with a round shape (e.g., Tommy Atkins, Haden, Keitt and Kent), weighing less than 500g will require 75 minutes, fruits between 501 and 700g need 90 minutes, while fruits between 701 and 900g will need 110 minutes. Mangoes with a flat shape such as Manila and Frances and weighing less than 375g require 65 minutes, and those weighing 376-570g need 75 minutes (USDA 2010). Accordingly, logistical protocols must be instituted to ensure that mangoes are graded by weight and size prior to hot water treatment in order to control fruit fly and at the same time to reduce fruit injury.Appropriate Logistics to Reduce Losses in the Postharvest Handling System: Case of Mango Furthermore, packing house managers should advise packing line operators on certain strategies that could improve the hot water treatment and overall fruit quality. Brecht (2010) has identified these as:1. allowing only mature fruits to be given the treatment since immature mangoes are more susceptible to damage by hot water;2. eliminating latex contact with fruit surfaces during harvest since latex damage is accelerated by hot water;3. using potable water only, or sanitized water the first time the water is heated; and 4. improving temperature control in hot water tanks to allow treatment at the lowest allowable temperature since even 0.5°C above the required temperature could make a difference in fruit tolerance.Hydro-cooling mangoes after hot water treatment decreases flesh temperature more rapidly than holding in air, thereby reducing hot water injury. This pre-cooling treatment requires specific time-temperature procedures. For example, mangoes should be hydrocooled immediately after heat treatment, by adding an additional 10 minutes to the hot water protocol. The hydro-cooled water temperature must be maintained at 21-22°C, and the duration of hydro-cooling should allow fruit flesh temperature to be between 27 and 29°C. Sanitizer levels in the hydro-cooled water should be maintained, such that effective free chlorine is 50-100ppm (Brecht 2010). Hydro-cooled mangoes must be immediately packed to minimize re-warming of fruits.Sorting and grading must be done to remove fruits with physical injuries, incipient decay, misshapen fruits, and fruits with physiological disorders, such as heat injury or internal breakdown, lenticel damage and surface scald. Grading mangoes provides the following advantages. It:• provides common basis for assessment by all, and is therefore beneficial to the producers, traders as well as to the consumers;• enables producers to get a better price for their mangoes;• assists producers and other intermediaries in preparing fresh mangoes for market with appropriate labelling;• helps consumers to get standard, quality mangoes at fair prices;• allows consumers to compare the prices of different qualities of mango in the market;• assures quality of the mangoes and also reduces cost of marketing and transportation;• enables mangoes of similar grade can be stored in bulk;• facilitates a better understanding of market values;• enables e-trading so that mangoes can be bought and sold without inspection;• provides an authentic and scientific basis for promoting and managing marketing systems;• serves as a realistic and common basis for market intelligence and reporting.Waxing Brecht (2010) recommended waxing of mangoes due to the resultant improvement of appearance, glossiness, and reduced water loss, but cautioned about the need for uniform wax distribution and wax formulation strength. For example, application of full-strength carnauba-based wax can induce lenticel damage on immature mangoes as well as peel damage, which could develop after a period of refrigerated storage and transport. The use of water-soluble coatings ought to be avoided since this can be dissolved during subsequent handling when condensation occurs, if and when cold fruits are subjected to warmer temperatures.Mangoes should be packed in single layered, one or two-piece full telescopic, self-locking fibreboard cartons with bursting strength requirements of 250-275lb/in 2 ). Ventilation and handle holes are recommended to provide adequate ventilation and for ease of handling. A layer of shredded paper at the base of the carton is desirable to assist in cushioning the fruits. Each alternate mango in a carton should be wrapped in tissue to reduce fruit to fruit rubbing. Small identity labels attached to alternate fruit will enhance product presentation. Palletisation is essential to minimise fruit damage due to multiple handling, and can also aid in the movement of fruit within the packinghouse, or during temporary storage (Medlicott 1990).Attention to strict logistical procedures is necessary to optimize the ripening of mangoes. Although fruit ripening varies according to the variety and origin, a temperature of 20-22°C and 90-95 percent relative humidity is recommended. It must be noted however, that ripening at 15.5-18°C may result in the most attractive skin colour, but the flavour will remain tart and the mangoes will require a further two to three days at 21-24°C to attain a sweet flavour. Ripening at 27-30°C may result in mottled skin and strong flavour, and is retarded above 30°C. Initiation and synchronisation of ripening and a shortening of theAppropriate Logistics to Reduce Losses in the Postharvest Handling System: Case of Mango ripening time of mangoes can be achieved with exposure to ethylene gas. Treatment with ethylene gas is carried out in an air-tight room for 24 hours at 20-25°C and 90-95 percent relative humidity. The concentration of gas required during exposure is 10-100ppm. Airtight rooms should have adequate air circulation to enable uniform distribution of ethylene throughout the room.Prolonged storage of more than three to five days should not be used for fruits to be airfreighted. At storage temperatures below 12°C, unripe mangoes will develop chilling injury, which will cause a drastic reduction in fruit quality and increase spoilage. Symptoms of chilling injury include inhibition of ripening, pitting, internal discolouration, grey, scaldlike discolouration of the skin, increased water loss, increased susceptibility to decay and undesirable changes to flavour. Chilling injury can be reversed if the time of holding at low temperature is prolonged. Variations exist in the degree of sensitivity of the different cultivars to chilling injury.While most cultivars show injury below 10°C, if fruit have just reached maturity, tolerance to chilling injury increases as fruit ripen (Mohammed and Brecht, 2002). Other measures include maintenance in modified /controlled atmospheres, and conditioning at high temperatures (35-38°C) for a few hours before storage at low temperature. Chilling injury symptoms for example in cv. Keitt mangoes kept at 38°C for zero, 24 or 48 hours before storage at 5°C for 11 days decreased with increased duration at 38°C, while non-heated fruit developed severe chilling injury symptoms (McCollum, D'Aquino and McDonald 1993). Storage at 12°C and 90-95 percent relative humidity will maintain mangoes in an acceptable condition, and they will ripen in a satisfactory manner on transfer to warmer temperatures. This however will depend on variety, harvest maturity and the time of harvest in the season. Strict levels of quality control in fruit stored at low temperature is essential, as blemishes, bruises, and infections will manifest themselves to a greater degree as against when the fruit is exported by air, and marketed rapidly (Medlicott 1986). Flesh firmness is a good indicator of the stage of ripeness and can be used for managing mango ripening as shown in Table 8.2. Mango is the only known host for the mango weevil (Cryptorhynchus mangiferae) which is found throughout most mango-growing regions and therefore it is a pest of quarantine significance. The weevil is primarily a pest of the seed, with one seed supporting up to five larvae, although occasionally it may be found in the flesh of the fruit. Eggs are laid on the outside of the developing fruit and the larvae penetrate the young seed, where the weevil completes its development (Yahia 2011). Mango oviposition occurs when the fruit is marble size, and may occur in less than eight days or up to 90 days (Shukla and Tandom 1985). As the fruit matures and the seed covering becomes hard, the first instars will not be able to penetrate the endocarp. Fruits, which fall to the ground, can become sufficiently damaged to allow the weevils to move out of the seed and seek hiding places where they can survive (Yahia 2011).Mango seed weevil is an important limiting factor for the international trade of mango and prevents the export of fresh fruit to areas not infested with this pest (Figure 8.6). The flesh of ripe fruit is damaged when adults emerge from the seeds, and the weevil-damaged seeds may limit plant propagation in nurseries and orchards (Yahia 2011).Many of the losses that occur during transportation of mango fruits are due to inappropriate packaging and box arrangement inside transport vehicles. Common types of mechanical damage during transportation or distribution are impact damage through dropping, compression damage due to high stacking, punctures from container protrusions, and vibration damage (Figure 8.7). Vibration damage of mango fruits results in abrasion marks and cuts ranging from light scars to skin removal and possibly some flesh. Compression injury of mango fruits is associated with bruises, cracks, splits and deformation. Proper packaging and configuration of mango fruits help to immobilize the fruits within the container and reduce abrasion injury due to fruit-to-fruit contact during transportation. It is also important to stack fruits during transportation and distribution to enable proper air circulation to facilitate the removal of heat from the fruits as well as to dissipate incoming heat from the atmosphere.Many of the losses that occur during transportation of mango fruits are due to inappropriate packaging and box arrangement inside transport vehicles. Common types of mechanical damage during transportation or distribution are impact damage through dropping, compression damage due to high stacking, punctures from container protrusions, and vibration damage (Figure 8.7). Vibration damage of mango fruits results in abrasion marks and cuts ranging from light scars to skin removal and possibly some flesh. Compression injury of mango fruits is associated with bruises, cracks, splits and deformation. Proper packaging and configuration of mango fruits help to immobilize the fruits within the container and reduce abrasion injury due to fruit-to-fruit contact during transportation. It is also important to stack fruits during transportation and distribution to enable proper air circulation to facilitate the removal of heat from the fruits as well as to dissipate incoming heat from the atmosphere.Mango fruits destined for shipping overseas should always be pre-cooled. Pre-cooling is essential to remove field heat, and slow the rate of the various biochemical and physiological processes within the fruit, as well as to decrease the refrigeration demand during cold storage or refrigerated transport. The selection and use of boxes for marine container shipment of mango fruits should include the following logistical procedures:• corrugated boxes should be strong enough to withstand the effects of high humidity during storage and transport;• boxes must never be stacked beyond edges of pallets;• pallet loads should be unitized and secured;• boxes and inner packaging should allow vertical airflow, especially if fruits are warmer than the refrigeration set point temperature when stowed;• box vents should be aligned between layers of boxes;• pallets should be used where deck board spacing aligns with box vents; Thompson et al. (2000) have devised a container loading checklist, applicable to mango fruits for export to regional and extra-regional markets. Steps should be taken to ensure that the:• interior of container is clean and odour-free;• container is not damaged and door seals are in good repair, and floor drains are open;• refrigeration unit is operational and the container is cooled to desired loading temperature;| 257Appropriate Logistics to Reduce Losses in the Postharvest Handling System: Case of Mango• mango loads are at the specified pulp temperature and properly stowed;• portable temperature recorder charts are marked with load identification, start time and date;• thermostat is set to the correct temperature and fresh air exchange is set properly;• security seal is properly attached to rear door of container.The fresh-cut mango industry is developing rapidly throughout the Caribbean. The quality of the whole fruit of the fresh mango fruit is an important requirement for maintaining the wholesomeness and overall acceptability of fresh-cut mango slices or cubes. Other factors include the cultivar, pre-harvest cultural practices and climatic conditions, maturity at harvest, method of harvesting, postharvest harvest handling practices cited above, time between harvest and preparation of the fresh-cut fruit (Figure 8.8). The method of preparation, such as, sharpness of cutting blade or device, size and surface area of the cut pieces, washing, use of sanitizers and removal of surface moisture, and subsequent handling conditions (packaging, speed of cooling, maintaining optimum temperature and relative humidity, expedited marketing), must also be integrated into the overall quality logistics management to attain a high quality product.In Trinidad and Tobago for example, the cultivars most suitable for fresh-cut purposes are cv. Long, cv. Rose, cv. Tommy Atkins, while in Guyana, it is mainly cv. Buxton spice. Regardless of the cultivar used for fresh-cut mango, fruits must be harvested mature-green to mature with light yellow flesh colour to ensure better flavour quality. The post-cutting life of fresh-cut mango at 5°C is eight to ten days, but depending on the cultivar this could be limited by flesh browning and softening (Yahia 2011). Peeling fruits to a depth of at least 2 mm and trimming flesh near the stem could however minimize fruit discolouration (Limbanyen, Brecht, Sargent and Bartz 1998). In other studies, Allong, Wickham and Mohammed (2000) indicated that fresh-cut slices from half-ripe (12.5 to 14 percent TSS) and firm-ripe (14.5 to 17 percent TSS) cv. Julie and cv. Graham mangoes had a shelf life of eight days or four days at 10°C. Half-ripe (13 to 16 percent Soluble Solids Content) mangoes were found to be ideal for fresh-cut in terms of maintenance of acceptable appearance, texture, and taste during post-cutting life at 5°C.A major quality logistics requirement for fresh-cut mangoes is the use of very sharp tools to peel fruits and cut flesh into slices or cubes in order to reduce cellular damage and leakage of cellular contents and enzymatic browning. Selection of packaging containers is another important logistical option. The use of rigid containers reduces water loss and mechanical damage during distribution. Shelf life of fresh-cut mango cubes or chunks (Figure 8.9page 210) is limited by browning and softening, but cubes treated with one percent calcium chloride and stored in sealed modified atmospheric packages had a shelf-life of 12 days compared to nine days for those dipped in one percent calcium chloride and stored in air. Sanitation of the whole fruit and the processing equipment, tools and facilities as well as the maintenance of a low temperature environment during all fresh-cut process are all important to reduce potential microbial problems.Mangoes are processed into several products such as, juices, nectars, jelly powders, fruit bars, flakes, dried products, jams, puree, dehydrated products and canned slices. However, only about 0.22 percent of mangoes produced in the world are processed (Yahia 2011). Green mangoes are processed into pickles, brine stock and chutney (Figure 8.10 -page 210). There are two classifications of pickles; salt pickles and oil pickles, processed from whole and sliced fruit with and without stones. Diverse types of pickles vary mainly in the proportions and kinds of spices used in their preparations. The ingredients are mixed together and filled into wide-mouthed bottles, and extra oil added to form a 1-2cm layer over the pickles (Yahia 2011). Chutney is prepared from peeled, sliced or grated mature or semi-ripe mango by cooking the shredded fruit with salt over medium heat for five to seven minutes. Sugar, spices and vinegar are added, and cooking is done over moderate heat until the product resembles a thick puree. The remaining ingredients are added and simmered for another five minutes, cooled and preserved in sterilized jars. Spices usually include cumin seeds, ground cloves, cinnamon, chilli powder, ginger and nutmeg (Yahia 2011).Drying procedures such as sun-drying, tunnel drying, vacuum drying, or osmotic dehydration can also be applied to sliced mango with or without the peel. However sun drying is more popular in most countries because it is inexpensive. The product is however, susceptible to contamination by dirt, insects, rodents and microorganisms. At the same time, it must be noted that the process requires several days based on sunlight availability and temperature control. More hygienic and equally cost effective systems such as solar dryers are available. These have been adopted by medium to large-scale processors. Spray-dried mango powders are used for flavouring confectionery and pharmaceutical preparations as well as in the manufacture of baby foods and tropical fruit drinks which are fortified with nutrients to replace those portions lost during processing (Raymundo, Ombico and de Villa 2009).Appropriate Logistics to Reduce Losses in the Postharvest Handling System: Case of MangoThe puree of the green mango can also be converted to a powder similar to the puree of ripe mangoes by spray drying. The spray dried powders can then be mixed with other condiments and used as a souring agent for some dishes, or as raw material in the manufacture of instant green mango shake (University of the Phillipines Los Banos 2005). Edible pulp makes up to 33-85 percent of the fresh fruit, while peel and kernel amount to four to seven percent and 9-40 percent respectively (Wu, Chen and Fang 1993). By-products of mango may amount to 35-60 percent of the total fruit weight. Other parts of the mango fruit are also utilized, such as the mango kernels, which are a source of fat, natural antioxidants, starch, flour and feed. Studies have been conducted on the peel for possible use in the production of biogas, dietary fibre with high antioxidant activity and as a source of pectin (Berardini, Knodler and Schieber Carle 2005).Mangoes grown throughout the LAC region are highly susceptible to Anthracnose which is caused by a fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Figure 8.11). Infection occurs during flowering and fruit set and its severity increases with high humidity and rainfall. Disease symptoms include small, dark spots that become enlarged to irregular, dark brown areas as the fruit ripens. Accordingly, the fungus often remains dormant on green fruits and develops as the fruit ripens and loses its natural resistance. The timing of pre-havest fungicidal treatments is therefore critical in reducing the incidence of this disease (Table 8.3). If this is done then consumer satisfaction for disease free fruits will increase and eventually the reputation of high quality fruits will impact positively on demand and prices. Some cultivars of mango such as cv. Julie and cv. Tommy Atkins are highly susceptible to internal physiological disorders in which there is disintegration of the flesh around the seed into a jellylike mass. Soft nose also occurs where there is partial ripening of the flesh at the distal end of the fruit, with stem-end cavity resulting in necrosis of the flesh around the cavity. According to Brecht (2010), some of these disorders can be reduced by increasing the calcium content via proper pre-harvest calcium applications (Table 8.3). • Sunken discoloured areas ( due to chilling injury) • Sunken shoulder areas (due to heat damage to the flesh below) • Uneven (blotchy) ripening (due to heat injury or chilling injury) • Void spaces in the flesh (due to heat injury or irradiation damage)Logistical demands for mangoes are influenced by their importance as a local and export product. Mango fruits harvested at the immature stage can be utilized as a range of valueadded products such as pickles, chutney, amchar, frozen slices and cubes, kuchelar, dried products, juices, nectars, canned slices and leathers. Mango fruits that are ripe can be eaten as a fresh fruit or in fresh-cut salads, and may also be processed into jams, jellies, squash, puree, dehydrated and canned slices. However, these fruits are easily bruised, affecting their taste and appearance, thus reducing the selling price. Being perishable, mango fruits, which have an average shelf life of two weeks require certain handling and storage conditions. The need for logistics management of mango fruits has come to the fore following the recent global energy crisis followed by the global financial crisis. Logistics management is therefore an important tool to enhance competiveness, while ensuring a focus on serviceability. Accordingly, considering the perishable nature of mangoes andAgriculture is now facing a new challenge, as it is not only expected to maximize production while reducing adverse impacts on the environment, but also ensure various ecosystem services (ES) and to diminish disservices (harmful effects). The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), which pointed out the importance of proper ecosystem functioning for human well-being, was a turning point in the consideration of the services provided by agriculture. As a result, a transformation of agricultural systems from conventional agricultural systems is therefore expected. Since agrosystems are ecosystems controlled by humans, farming practices lie at the core of this transition of agriculture. Integrated systems are the main forms of farming systems observed all over the world, and in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), they represent a vast legacy of experiences in the history, tradition and culture of such countries.The multiple ways by which people benefit from ecosystems e.g.:(i) Food: Ecosystems provide the conditions for growing food. Food comes principally from managed agro-ecosystems but marine and freshwater systems or forests also provide food for human consumption.(ii) Raw materials: Ecosystems provide a great diversity of materials for construction and fuel including wood, biofuels and plant oils that are directly derived from wild and cultivated plant species.(iii) Fresh water: Ecosystems play a vital role in the global hydrological cycle, as they regulate the flow and purification of water. Vegetation and forests influence the quantity of water available locally.(iv) Medicinal resources: Ecosystems and biodiversity provide many plants used as traditional medicines as well as providing the raw materials for the pharmaceutical industry. All ecosystems are a potential source of medicinal resources.Audrey Fanchone, Jean-Louis Diman, Gisèle Alexandre,More generally, in the Caribbean, multispecies systems whether mixed cropping systems, livestock farming systems or integrated ones, provide several ES. Using these systems as examples, this chapter examines the major driving forces that condition changes in farming practices. Agro-ecological engineering which relies on the ecological paradigm, is regarded as a suitable concept and approach to support this transformation. The chapter also proposes methods that might support the design of innovative agricultural systems, namely the step by step method and the de novo method. These methods are supported by concrete examples coming from several Caribbean or other tropical environments.After the Second World War, the shift from the concept of subsistence farming to the 'Green Revolution' represented a change in the prevailing agricultural paradigm, whereby the main objective assigned to agriculture was that of ensuring food security by securing an adequate market supply, a reasonable standard of living, and increasing farmers' incomes. During the 1980s, this production objective was largely achieved, and surpassed the requirements in Europe and many industrialized countries. This new standard involved the use of seeds of high-yielding varieties, primarily of wheat and rice, and the adoption of a modern package of agricultural tools and practices involving chemical fertilizers, tractors, pesticides, irrigation, mechanical threshers, electric and diesel pumps, among other things (Parayil 2003). This system, however, led to a decrease in farm numbers (rural exodus, loss of rural jobs), specialization and marginalization of territories, standardization of landscape, and deterioration of natural resources. The 'Green Revolution' also caused enormous environmental impacts, including soil degradation, water pollution and loss of biodiversity.Agriculture is not only expected to produce food and fibre either for direct consumption or for industrial use, but also has to provide some other functions while at the same time minimizing adverse effects on the environment (Zhang et al. 2007). The new challenges faced by agriculture are to ensure various ES, to resolve apparent conflicts between them, and to diminish its disservices (Doré et al. 2011). The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment provided a new conceptual framework for analysing these multiple ES (MEA 2005). In new agrosystems, ES are not externalities, but are intentionally produced by stakeholders, who create such services by implementing practices (minimum tillage, crop association, organic fertilisation, integrated control of pests) which modify the production sequence. A new issue for researchers is therefore the evaluation of the cost of the production of such ES. In the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology forEcological Modernization of Caribbean Agrosystems: From Concept to Design Development report (IAASTD 2008) it has been argued that the challenge to achieving this multi-objective agriculture not only requires continuing the development of disciplinary knowledge, but also more systemic approaches, and has recently officially called for a reorientation of agricultural science and technology towards more holistic approaches. New concepts such as 'agroecology' and 'ecological intensification' have been developed to support this transformation. Vanloqueren and Baret (2009) have defined agroecological engineering as 'an umbrella concept for different agricultural practices and innovations such as biological control, cultivar mixtures, agroforestry systems, habitat management techniques (e.g. strip management or beetle banks around wheat fields), or natural systems agriculture, aiming at perennial food-grain-producing systems. Crop rotations, soil fertility improvement practices, mixed crop and livestock management and intercropping are also included. Some applications involve cutting edge technologies while others are old practices (e.g. traditional systems that provide significant insights to agroecology). For these authors, 'the scientific paradigm on which agroecological engineering relies is ecology (and holism)'. As such, the objective is the design of productive agricultural systems that require as few agrochemicals and energy inputs as possible, and instead rely on ecological interactions and synergisms between biological components to produce the mechanisms that will enable the systems to boost their own soil fertility, productivity and crop protection (Altieri 1995).Some aspects of agroecological engineering may be related to biomimicry (Benyus 1997), as illustrated in Figure 9. 1. Doré et al., (2011) noted that in natural ecosystems, as a result of the various animal and plant species, the final ecosystem is provided with a number of services, for instance pollination. In standard cropping systems, these interactions may lead to pest damage on crops, and so must be managed utilizing various control methods to limit yield loss. An increase in plant species diversity in systems mimicking natural ecosystems could allow natural enemies to control pests and generate ES (Doré et al. 2011). The concept of agroecological engineering, which sets out to improve the structure of the agricultural system and 'to make every part of the structure work well' (Liang 1998), differs from genetic engineering for example, which has as its primary objective the improvement of only a single element of the agroecosystem, for example (modifying existing plants or designing new plants).Because agrosystems are ecosystems controlled by humans, farming practices are at the core of this transition of agriculture. According to Meynard et al. (2006) four major driving forces promote the transformation of farming practices. These are: i. the recognition of the responsibility of agriculture in the deterioration of the environment;Sustainable Food Production Practices in the Caribbean -Volume 2ii. the evolution of the demand for food and non-food products;iii. the consideration of work and incomes of the farmers; and iv. the evolution of the place of agriculture in the territories.However, this transformation of agricultural practices presents some challenges. The first challenge is between the economy and the environment, because of the necessity to decrease inputs (e.g. fertilizers, phytosanitary products) and the absence of compensation for production losses or additional workload, with the second being between the individual logic of the farmers and that of the collective governance. This latter challenge is related to supply chains in the same territory, which compete directly or indirectly for the same raw materials such as fertile soils, flat lands, irrigated water and local breeds (Le Bail 2000). | 267Ecological Modernization of Caribbean Agrosystems: From Concept to DesignIn some parts of the world, integrated systems (IS) are the predominant forms of farming systems (Herrero et al. 2010). Nowadays, IS produce close to 50 percent of the world's cereals and most of the staples consumed by poor people: 41 percent of maize, 86 percent of rice, 66 percent of sorghum, and 74 percent of millet production (Herrero et al. 2009). They also generate the bulk of livestock products in the developing world: 75 percent of the milk and 60 percent of the meat, and employ many millions of people on farms, in formal and informal markets, in processing plants, and other parts of the value chain. Although there is a lack of available information in LAC, IS have an informal background of rich experiences in the history and tradition of these countries (González-García et al. 2012). In these countries, IS have persisted over time because as natural ecosystems, they appear to be well adapted to local constraints, after a long process of natural selection (Dawson and Fry 1998;Ewel 1999). This is even more the case for most of the small and large islands of the Caribbean where there are added constraints such as: the shortage of arable land and the high competition between agriculture and other uses such as urbanization and tourism. In these countries, the urgent need to increase outputs of each piece of agricultural land by producing food, feed, and other ES, tests the boundaries of conventional agriculture. The challenge in the Caribbean zone therefore becomes to promote IS which enable the provision of ES.Agriculture fulfils three main functions, namely:1. production (including economics aspects) -of food and non-food goods, and the provision of raw material for industry;2. socio-cultural -to maintain the social fabric of rural areas, planning in territories and transmitting of a cultural heritage; and 3. environmental -biodiversity preservation, regulation of the environment, conservation and regulation of water quality, and to decrease energy consumption.Despite an awareness of the multifunctional character of agriculture, this concept has not been embraced within the public policy context. According to MEA (2005), the acknowledgement of the importance of ecosystem functioning for human well-being, provided a turning point in the consideration of the services provided by agriculture.The concept of ES not only encompasses the same functions as those expressed by multifunctionality, but also embodies the maintenance of the good functioning of the ecosystem. ES emphasize the human usage of natural processes through the supply of material goods, determine ecological regulation modes, and the role of the ecosystem to support both productive and non-productive activities. The MEA defined four categories of ES; supporting, provisioning, regulating and cultural (Figure 9.2). The supporting services relate to services that are necessary for the production of all other ES. They differ from provisioning, regulating, and cultural services in that their impacts on people are often indirect or occur over a very long time, whereas changes in the other categories have relatively direct and short-term impacts on people. While the provisioning services relate to the products obtained from the ecosystem, the regulating services are the benefits obtained from the regulation of ecosystem processes. Finally, the cultural services relate to the non-material benefits people obtain from ecosystems through spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, reflection, recreation, and aesthetic experiences.As the figure shows, many of the services listed within the MEA framework are highly interlinked and involve different aspects of the same biological processes. Moreover, MEA services only relate to the positive impacts of ecosystems on human well-being. The basic concept adopted by the MEA, is based on a multi-scale and multi-disciplinary approach that provides an integrated perspective by emphasizing the interdependence between socioeconomic and environmental issues. The sustainability of agrosystems presupposes the preservation of their economic and ecological viability, i.e. the preservation of their productive capacity, as it relates to the maintenance of the good ecological functioning of the soils and the economical production of this system (market and societal value). Zhang et al. (2007) presented a conceptual framework for agrosystems and introduced the concept of disservices (Figure 9.3).The following sections provide an overview of some of the ES provided by multispecies systems in tropical areas.In considering the provisioning of services, productivity per unit area can be increased when crops are combined, compared to single crops systems (Willey 1979;Jolliffe 1997), provided that the combination is suitable. Yield advantage occurs because growth resources such as light, water, and nutrients are more completely absorbed and converted to crop biomass by the intercrop over time and space. This is as a result of differences in the competitive ability for growth resources between the component crops, in characteristics such as rates of canopy development, final canopy size (width and height), photosynthetic adaptation of canopies to irradiance conditions, and rooting depth (Midmore 1993; Morris and Garrity 1993;Tsubo, Walker and Mukhala 2001). Biotic factors such as the presence of mycorrhizae, bacteria, fungi, termites and insects also play equally important roles (Derelle 2012). When tubers are used in combination with legumes/maize, the land equivalent ratios (LER) of the sweet potato and bean combination, ranges from 1.69 to 1.79, depending on density of beans. For a yam and maize/peanut combination, the LER ranges from 0.98 to 1.60, and was found to result in favourable yields/unit area, as well as yam tuber size (Cornet, 2005;Lyonga 1980;Odurukwe 1986). A tomato and cowpea combination produces a LER of 1.08 to 1.31 depending on their respective densities (Obedoni et al. 2005).Soil protection/conservation services are also part of the regulating services. Cropping combinations and the hedges or trees associated with them, due to the high crop density, play a significant role in reducing soil and water erosion, thus contributing to the conservation or resilience of soils. An example of this can be found in West-Cameroon, where, as compared with mixed cropping systems, intensive monoculture was found to offer less soil protection against the 'splash' effect of raindrops that have high kinetic energy (Valet 1999). For andosols cultivated with maize monocrops on a 25 percent slope, such erosion can reach 122 T/ha/year (1996).Ecological Modernization of Caribbean Agrosystems: From Concept to Design Pest and disease control represents yet another regulating service provided by multispecies systems. Five hypotheses are generally advanced to explain the ability of crop combinations to regulate plant pests:1. The disruption hypothesis (push): one of the associated species disrupts the ability of the pathogen to attack the host plant by confusing it through the emission of volatile substances, visual effects, and a barrier effect (Khan et al. 1998).2. The hypothesis of the trap plant (pull): one of the associated species attracts pathogens, keeping them out of reach of the more vulnerable crop and also attracts predators to the pests.3. The natural enemies' hypothesis: based on the ability of mixed systems to favour greater diversity of predators and parasites.4. The hypothesis of micro-environment modification: mixed cropping systems can either create more favourable conditions for the plant under attack, or less favourable conditions for the development of the parasite, or more favourable conditions for the development of its natural enemies.5. Vertical and horizontal barrier effect -enabling plants to be concealed from insects, diluting the vector, modifying temperatures and the exposure that favours insects climbing up a stem.One of the major roles of crop combinations is their ability to resist attack by multiple pests and diseases. An analysis performed by Risch (1983) on an assessment of pests and natural enemies in polyculture as against monoculture, showed that in 53 percent of cases, in the former, less serious attacks occurred than in the latter. More importantly, the percentage of natural enemies of mixed crops is greater than in monocultures (59 percent vs. 9 percent ), yet in only 32 percent of the studies it was shown that there was no difference between monocultures and mixed cropping systems. The beneficial effect of mixed cropping in controlling disease and parasites was confirmed by other researchers (see for example Rämert, Lennartsson and Davies 2002;Root 1973;Szumigalski and Rene,2005;Vandermeer 1989). The beneficial effect is however not easy to demonstrate, as it is complex and unpredictable (Trenbath 1999). A cropping system with plant species used for different purposes can therefore assist in effectively addressing the issue of insect pests.Particularly under tropical conditions, a major challenge associated with livestock farming systems (LFS) has been a lack of recognition of the importance and benefits to be derived from the non-productive functions of animals, as well as the husbandry activities for the farmer/household and society (Lhoste et al. 1993). The LFS is not only concerned with the production of high-quality commodities, to meet the objective of food security, but also with the provision of multiple ecoservices as prescribed by MEA (2005). Animals and LFS are considered as highly multifunctional in tropical agroecosystems (Dedieu et al. 2011). With respect to the framework provided by Zhang et al. (2007), in the Caribbean, the first ES of LFS remains the provision of services (i.e. production of food, fibre, fuel). LFS also fulfil other categories of ES including: supporting services (soil structure and fertility, nutrient cycling, and genetic biodiversity), regulating services (soil retention, dung burial, atmospheric regulation), and non-marketable services (soil conservation, climate change mitigation, and wildlife habitat).In most farming systems in the world, LFS are practiced in association with crops (Herrero et al. 2010). In such integrated systems, crop and livestock activities compete for the same scarce resources which include land, labour, capital and skills. Consequently, in general, the productivity of livestock in mixed systems (e.g. milk production/animal/day, growth and reproduction rates), is lower than in specialised systems, so that the provisioning ES can be considered somewhat reduced, leading to the conclusion that IS are less productive. However, while there may be lower productivity per unit land or animal in one enterprise, higher overall productivity is common. This has been demonstrated for example in the case of integrated dairy systems in Cuba that have been assessed to be as productive as intensive single systems and totally more sustainable (Funes-Monzote and Monzote 2001). From the IS perspective, livestock plays many vital roles in the households and economies of the developing world, including producing food and power, generating income, storing capital reserves, and enhancing social status (Alexandre et al. 2014). In addition, livestock can be used for weed control, production of manure for fertilizer (Boval, Bellon and Alexandre 2014) and also for fuel (Preston and Rodriguez 2014).Crop-livestock integration is generally driven by increased population pressure, the main feature characterizing the Caribbean islands, which is often the main reason for farmers to intensify their farming systems. Livestock can affect the cycling of nutrients, opening alternative pathways, such as importation of nutrients from common land, and affect the speed and efficiency with which nutrients can be converted to plant-useable forms (Delve et al. 2001). Inclusion of livestock in mixed farming systems can provide an alternative use for crop residues. For example, if farmers need to plant a crop soon after harvesting a previous one, stubble incorporation may not be feasible, so that farmers may resort to burning it, resulting in increased carbon dioxide emissions. In contrast, livestock in IS can be used to remove and process stubble, potentially reducing the losses of carbon and nutrients. Blending crops and livestock has the potential to maintain ecosystem function and health and help prevent agricultural systems from becoming too 'brittle', by promotingEcological Modernization of Caribbean Agrosystems: From Concept to Design greater biodiversity and an increased capacity to absorb shocks to the natural resource base, something which Holling (2001) defined as resilience.From an ecological viewpoint, grasslands are ecosystems which exhibit a strong link between herbivores and floral diversity (Gliessman 2009) and when well-managed, can be a tool for ecological and regulating services, notably to maintain and restore biodiversity of the open landscape (Ma and Swinton 2011). Moreover, grasslands can potentially offset a significant proportion of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Appropriate management strategies, in the areas of stocking rate, grazing pressure and application of nitrogen fertilization would however be key (Boval et al. 2014). Animals contribute to improving the quality of the ground cover, important for soil erosion prevention and the watershed processes of infiltration and water retention (Gliessman et al. 2009). Thus, pastoral nomadism, a complex set of practices and knowledge, ensures the long-term maintenance of a sophisticated 'triangle of sustainability', which includes plants, animals and people.Beyond the ecological services, natural resources and landscapes may provide numerous social, cultural, recreational, and aesthetic services which satisfy human need and well-being (Ma and Swinton 2011;Boval and Dixon 2012). As such, most traditional agroecosystems have remarkable characteristics which are regulated by strong cultural values and collective forms of social organization, including customary institutions for agro-ecological management, normative arrangements for resource access and benefit sharing, value systems and rituals (Altieri and Toledo 2011). Livestock production systems based on grasslands therefore have great potential for social equity, poverty alleviation, risk reduction and gender equality (Gliessman 2009). These services must be seriously considered as they are well supported by agro-ecological concepts. The development of local food chains, in addition to renewing the meaning of farm work and the social links between city and country, also has an impact on energy consumption (Mundler and Rumpus 2012). These are important in the context of the exploitation of grassland eco-economic factors and are properly taken into account in the agro-ecological concepts.From Creole garden to simplified multispecies systems Multispecies cropping systems cover many modes of spatial distribution: on the surface, above and below the ground level, and time distribution, in relay with perennial or annual species (Valet and Ozier-Lafontaine 2014). The archetype of multispecies cropping systems in the Caribbean is the Creole garden that combines very different plants (e.g. grasses, shrubs and trees) in varying combinations, and in contrasting environments (i.e. lowlands and highlands). These systems are very close to agroforestry systems which incorporate trees and shrubs (Figure 9.4).The principles of the Creole garden are very similar to those of agroforestry systems, as they involve the growing of annual or biennial agricultural crops along with forest species. The long-term effects of this system on soil fertility will however depend on the management practices adopted at establishment, as well as at subsequent re-establishment. Complementary, supplementary and competitive interactions exist between trees and crops, and higher crop yields have been obtained when some agricultural crops are interplanted near leguminous trees such as Faidherbia albida (Acacia) (FAO 1994). Allelopathic interactions between trees and agricultural crops have also been investigated and such interactions have been reported (Susesh and Vinaya 1987). Many variations of this system are found in small family farms, involving between two and three species in the plots (Figure 9.5), which are not only chosen for human or animal consumption, but also for ES, namely in the form of the supply of nitrogen by legumes, and quick ground cover of creeping species for weed control.According to Valet and Ozier-Lafontaine (2014), while the idea that 'intercropping was only for peasant farming and has no place in modern agriculture', has persisted for a long time among researchers and developers, it appears that in many areas of the world, traditional farmers developed or inherited complex farming systems in the form of polycultures that were well adapted to the local conditions. It has been further suggested (Valet and Ozier-Lafontaine 2014) that this has helped farmers to sustainably manage harsh environments and to meet their subsistence needs, without depending on mechanization, chemical fertilizers, pesticides or other technologies of modern agricultural science. These practices, which are generally more efficient than the high-intensity agricultural systems, highlight the 'agroecological engineering' developed over centuries by many peasants in tropical zones. Preston (2009) has noted that farming systems should aim at maximizing plant biomass production from locally available diversified resources, processing of the biomass on the farm to provide food, feed and energy, and recycling of all waste materials. In addition, the generation of electricity can be a by-product of food/feed production instead of developing biofuels, which threaten food security (Suárez and Martín 2012). Biomass is fractioned into inedible cell wall materials that can be converted, through gasification into a source of fuel for the internal combustion engines driving electrical generators. The cell contents and related structures are used as human food or animal feed. It also offers opportunities for sequestration of carbon in the form of biochar, the solid residue remaining after gasification of the biomass, which in turn is used to enhance soil fertility and crop productivity.Ecological Modernization of Caribbean Agrosystems: From Concept to Design On the Tosoly farm, located in a humid, tropical region of Colombia, the integrated foodfeed-fuel model has been implemented by Preston and Rodriguez (2013). The farm is a medium-sized unit (7 ha), and in order to promote biodiversity, the crops (sugar cane, fruit and forage trees, and some forage plants) on the farm, are replicated in different areas. The livestock and fuel components are chosen for their capacity to utilize the crops and byproducts produced on the farm. All crops must be at least dual-purpose, have good biomass productivity, as it relates to the efficient capture of solar energy (new energy revolution), and adequate chemical composition (in mixed diets).The inclusion of livestock in the farming system is seen as a means of optimising the use of highly productive perennial crops such as sugar cane and multi-purpose trees. Sugar cane is easily separated into energy-rich juice, which can replace cereal grains in the feeding of pigs, as is done in Trinidad and Tobago, and Guadeloupe (Archimède et al. 2013), and residual bagasse, which can be used as one of the feedstocks for the gasifier. Forage trees are the natural feed resources for goats, which selectively consume the leaves, leaving the fibrous stems as another feedstock for gasification. Other farmyard animals are combined to maximize the use of feedstuffs, providing manure or draught power, and livestock products such as eggs, rabbit meat and honey. Any surplus commodities which remain after the family needs have been satisfied, are sold in the village market. Waste water from coffee pulping, family washing, and also all high moisture wastes from pigs and other animals are recycled through polyethylene biodigesters. Effluent from all biodigesters is combined and recycled to fertilise crops.Due to the wet climatic conditions found in Martinique throughout the year, fast weed growth is fast, resulting in the need for the implementation of permanent control measures in fruit tree crop systems, as this has a strong negative impact on yields. Weed control however generates high maintenance costs to fruit producers. Chemical weed control is the most common method used, but this is not a sustainable method due to issues related to water pollution and soil erosion (Hipps and Samuelson 1991; Duran-Zuazo and Rodriguez-Pleguezuelo 2008). Grazing animals which do not harm the cash crops therefore constitute a viable alternative. In Martinique for example, poultry (chickens and geese) were used in an orchard of guava trees and the feasibility and effectiveness of weed control were evaluated (Lavigne, Dumbardon-Martial and Lavigne 2012). It was found that although geese can be used to effectively control the herbaceous biomass, weed selection by the birds leads to a significant modification of the flora. The use of grass and perennial legumes in the orchard can also serve to enhance this cultivation system. The long-term effect of such an association however, remains to be assessed. Management of the stocking rate also plays a crucial role in such systems. In high stocking rate systems, over grazing can lead to deforestation and loss of associated biodiversity. This example shows how management practices can encompass both the provision of ecological services (weed management) and ecological disservices (loss of biodiversity).Added to the previous ES of production and regulation functions, this section underlines some other environmental and socio-economic services provided by livestock via the utilisation of an original case study. Tropical LFS have exhibited rich and high diversity not only for domesticated animals, but also for wildlife (species best adapted to their natural habitat). One is presented through the neo-tropical animal wildlife program implemented in the Caribbean (Garcia 2005). Around 30 important neo-tropical animal wildlife species are found in LAC. Twelve of these species are native to Trinidad and Tobago, where they are sold at higher prices than domestic animals. The neo-tropical animal wildlife programme fosters the high biodiversity of wildlife, building a whole concept to sustain a viable economic activity on the basis of AE principles developed at the food system level. According to Garcia (2005), the value of neo-tropical animal wildlife is varied, and can be broken down into an ecological role, economic importance, a nutritional function and socio-cultural significance. All of these features have a real impact on farmers' or hunters' income, gastronomy and agro-tourism in the country, something that is very difficult to assess.The San Juan farm is one of the more than 100,000 farms distributed by the Cuban government in the recent years. It is located in Junco village in the Cienfuegos valley and is currently owned by the Rey-Novoa family, which has extensive experience in traditional agriculture. Funes-Monzote (2009) studied the agroecological transition process of this agroecosystem over a period of eight years (2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011), taking into account criteria of social equity, economic rationality and ecological sustainability. It is a traditional peasant farm, in which agroecological transition started in 2004, from land which was managed in a conventional agriculture mode and then abandoned for nearly a decade. A detailed characterization was performed which considered the attributes of sustainable agroecosystems in an annual cyclical process of assessment, design, management and evaluation, according to the methodologies proposed by Masera et al. (1999); Funes-Monzote (2009). The family was involved in the identification, selection and implementation of the indicators of sustainability.Ecological Modernization of Caribbean Agrosystems: From Concept to DesignThe key lessons derived from the Rey-Novoa family experience with an innovative process of agroecological transition were (Rey-Novoa and Funes-Monzote 2013):1. greater food self-sufficiency and traditional production;2. promotion of local, drought-tolerant pasture in rotation or silvopastoral systems;3. increased nutrient recycling, water, soil and forest conservation, and the biodiversity associated with native crops and animals;4. account of natural conditions (male effect) in bovine reproduction;5. genetic and species diversification on the farm via the integration of trees with crops and animals;6. minimal dependence on external inputs for the basic infrastructure of housing, transportation, production, supply sources and reservoirs, irrigation of low power energy and water consumption.The experience of the Rey-Novoa family farm shows that efforts to promote agriculture and knowledge processes in harmony with nature and society, must consist not only of actions to preserve and strengthen the productive logic of peasant families, but also a broad process of empowerment, capacity building and agricultural innovation at the local level, based on the participation of families with help from researchers, local institutions and rural organizations to redesign the agricultural land (Funes-Monzote 2013).An agroecological transition model adopted in the context of the family farm is something that can be replicated within the framework of other agricultural systems found within the Caribbean in the quest for sustainability. As has shown, the process of agroecological transition helps to mitigate the degradation that exists in several agroecosystems. It is therefore critical that such studies should be continued. This will allow for the development of an agricultural model that is less dependent on oil, has a low environmental impact, is better suited to climate change, and can be characterised as a local and multifunctional agriculture.In light of the foregoing, a number of tools are available for use, in addition to which, a number of practical recommendations can be made, which can be adopted to help in the management of these ecosystems.At the National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) in Guadeloupe, an expert system, SIMSERV was developed to assist with the selection of cover crops (Ozier-Lafontaine et al. 2011). 1 This tool was created to optimise the selection of potential species to one or more services, while shortening the time of selection. This approach offers the advantage of capturing expert knowledge in an easily accessible and reusable database. For each cover crop, SIMSERV calculates the potential for it to provide a service in a given context, which is defined by the user who provides required information related to the: i) required service, ii) description of agroecological and socio-economic characteristics, iii) mode of establishment -in rotation or association, and iv) a cash crop.The system matches the data defined for the particular context, with information from the database, which is then used to calculate the capacity for each cover crop to provide the service or not. The method of calculating is based on the aggregation of decisions in a \"decision tree\". Three profiles are given in the application: i) the administrator builds the decision tree; ii) the expert assigns values to the indicators to describe the cash crops and the cover crops; and iii) the user uses this information to describe his/her scenario, then chooses a context. Based on the analysis for each cover crop, the results, which are presented in tabular form, provide the user with an indication of the name and the qualitative assessment obtained for the selected service. Cover crops -'very good', based on their capacity to provide the service, in response to the selected context.The soil organic matter (OM) is one of the essential components of agrosystems. Among its agro-environmental functions, OM helps maintain the structure and porosity of the soil (effect on water storage, its ventilation and the risk of erosion), stimulate biological activity, preserve biodiversity of the soil, provide nutrients to the crops (nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur) and also helps to retain some micro pollutants (i.e. an effect on water quality). Changes in the OM content due to improper land use and farming practices, greatly affect all soil functions; the physical, chemical and biological quality. To address this, the MorGwanik © tool was developed. 2 It is based on the results obtained at the INRA French Antilles and Guiana Research Centre, with respect to the functioning of tropical soils, the fate of crop residues and the organic inputs (compost and agricultural reusable waste). It also takes into account the effect of the great diversity of soils and microclimates present in Guadeloupe on the OM content. MorGwanik © was designed to estimate the evolution of the OM content in agricultural soils of Guadeloupe according to some user-defined choices,Ecological Modernization of Caribbean Agrosystems: From Concept to Design such as location of the farm, useful crop rotation, type and rate of organic fertilizers used. It is intended for agricultural stakeholders such as farmers, technical advisors, policy makers, researchers, agronomists, and environmental professionals, and can also be easily adapted to systems found in the other Caribbean islands.Both the quantity and quality of feeds are deciding factors not only for animal survival but more importantly to meet their nutrient needs for maintenance and production. Feeding and nutrition-related factors also impact upon, and often determine individual vulnerability to climatic constraints or potential diseases. Feeding practices should ideally match the available local resources as previously stated (Preston 2009). Many authors have recommended exploiting available feed and by-products instead of building a feeding system according to animal requirements (refer to the examples of sugar cane and cocoyam outlined in the section on the Tosoly farm). It is not a question of maximising the biological function of production, but rather optimising the feed resource partitioning at both the farm and territory levels, in the absence of competition between users.The following section provides some recommendations in the area of feeding animals based on data gathered from Caribbean and Latin American experiences in the area of domestic animal (Table 9.1) and wildlife production (Table 9.2) suited for the region. Brown-Uddenberg et al. (2004) for example, reported that the agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) can eat any kind of vegetable matter, and in Trinidad, these animals, both in the wild and captivity, were reported to eat a wide variety of fruits from trees and shrubs (40 species), herbs and grasses (four species), garden crops (17 species) and livestock feeds. The peccary (Tayassu tajacu), a pig-like mammal, is known to be herbivorous and frugivorous in Brazil and Trinidad (Young et al. 2012) and is regarded as a pseudo-ruminant, thus indicating a potential for non-conventional farming.Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas)• foliage x X 2] and 4]• tuber X 2] and 4] Cassava (Manihot esculenta)Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica)Mulberry (Morus alba), 2] and 3]Cocoyam (Xanthosoma saggitifolium)• foliage X 2] and 4]Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium)• foliage x 1], 3] and 4Erythrina (Erythrina glauca)Banana (Musa paradisiaca)Sugar cane (Sacharum officinalis)**after detoxification; ***goat -green; pig -green and ripe; x -study undertaken Cassava (Manihot esculenta)• foliage x X 1] and 4]• tuber** x 2] and 4]Water grass (Commelina elegans)Sugar cane (Sacharum officinalis)** Agouti -ripe fruit; Peccary -green Source: Garcia et al., (2006) Meynard et al. ( 2006) listed four major driving forces behind changes in farming practices. These are: the deterioration of the environment and the recognized responsibility of agriculture; the evolution of the demand of food and non-food products; the consideration of work and incomes of farmers in a globalized world; and the evolution of the place of agriculture in the territories. Because of these forces, some radical changes to cropping and livestock farming systems are emerging. The improvement of agricultural systems clearly calls for innovative measures to facilitate an improvement of the ES, the adaptation to climate change, the integration of territorial dynamics, and the design of agri-food systems.The classic challenge remains between economic and environmental requirements. The other challenges are between the individual farmer's decisions and territorial dynamic, and between sectors of a same territory, associated with competition among different productions for territorial resources.Resolving these challenges and reconciling contradictory demands require either the working out of new compromises, or the proposal of new solutions to resolve them, as against focussing on the somewhat unattainable desirable innovations or ideal farming systems. A systematic approach to innovation is required, which involves: identifying a range of solutions; leaving the decision-making to farmers and other stakeholders; helping them to build their own systems adapted to their specific realities; and in the process, compromising where necessary.These encompass a consideration of the objectives and constraints of each actor in the innovative process, both at the farm level and at the country level. At farm level, in order to support farmers in the design of systems adapted to their situation, two major approaches can be distinguished: the 'de novo' design and the step-by-step design (Meynard et al. 2012). The 'de novo' design aims to design cropping or farming systems that break away from existing systems (very often model-based design), whereas, the step-by-step design incorporates the transition towards innovative systems by improving the existing systems step by step, in a progressive manner. This latter system is primarily based on a spiral of continuous improvement including diagnosis/development of possible systems/ implementation/and new diagnosis.At the country level, interactions of stakeholders around resource management need to be supported. Innovations relating to the co-ordination of farming systems at the country level can assist by taking into account the different interests of the various stakeholders which can be contradictory and often irreconcilable. Identification of action items for public authorities is at the core of the designing process since these constitute the means to facilitate the transition process. Public actions have to be taken carefully because: i) they sometimes strongly limit the capacity of farmers to adapt to the diversity of soils, climates and situations; ii) they are codified at the elementary agricultural technique level whereas environmental impacts often depend on interactions between several techniques; and iii) they are often felt to be constraints. Within this context, institutional innovation is required that will favour agronomic or agro-ecological innovation.Scientists are then faced with a paradoxes since innovative design cannot be programmed (by definition) and yet it is essential if it is to fully feature in the programmes ofEcological Modernization of Caribbean Agrosystems: From Concept to Design research institutions/organisations and contribute to the shaping of scientific priorities, interdisciplinarity and partnership. The following section elaborates how this pathway was used to design systems adapted to the Caribbean region. Two examples are provided: the step-by-step design of citrus systems (Le Bellec et al. 2012) and the de novo design of banana farming systems (Blazy et al. 2010 andArchimède et al. 2012).This design methodology has been used for citrus farmers in Guadeloupe as a mechanism to reduce herbicide load. Where changes were made in the field, the expectation was that there would be impacts felt within the whole farming system (local), in the agricultural sector (regional), and the pesticide industry (global). These represent some of the 'cascading effects' that are mostly unpredictable, but would nevertheless influence the general sustainability of the modified regional socio-economic and agricultural landscape (Kinzig et al. 2006). This demands a need for dynamic, non-linear, multi-stakeholder, and transdisciplinary approaches (Veldkamp et al. 2009) to sustainable development, in order to preserve the structure, identity, and functions of a 'socio-ecological system' (Walker et al. 2004).With a view to redesigning an alternative citrus production systems adapted to the Guadeloupe particular context, Le Bellec et al. (2011) developed the DISC method (DISC: an acronym for re-Design and assessment of Innovative Sustainable Cropping Systems), which involves, a multi-scale, multi-stakeholder, participatory approach, and represents an improvement on the classical prototyping methods developed at field level. The DISC method involves four categories of stakeholders distributed into two distinct groups; professional stakeholders (farmers, researchers, and agricultural advisors), and public stakeholders (representatives of the State, regional institutions, civil organizations), and has been used to address citrus production in Guadeloupe (Figure 9.6), where local demand for citrus is covered mostly by imports. To satisfy this demand, producers had to increase production while reducing the use of pesticides, in accordance with French government objectives (Ecophyto 2008). This ruling was introduced at a time when citrus producers were still facing unresolved technical difficulties and were struggling to improve the quality of their products on the local market. The main concern in re-designing citrus cropping systems therefore was to develop lower-input cropping systems with improved economic and quality performances, in a move toward sustainable citrus production in Guadeloupe (Le Bellec et al. 2012). Two workshops were held for the main actors involved in the citrus industry, and included farmers implementing citrus production and specialist researchers in the area of citrus production. A study was undertaken by the researchers with the objective of identifying the types of farming strategies implemented by producers and the constraints they face (Le Bellec et al. 2011). While the goal of the workshop with the stakeholders was aimed at focusing on the design of cropping systems prototypes, the other one for public stakeholders was aimed at establishing objectives for the new cropping system based on an integrated regional perspective. Experiments were performed at the local experimental station to test and adjust the prototypes to performance objectives, and an assessment tool was constructed to evaluate prototypes. It was found that the two main technical constraints that needed to be overcome to improve Guadeloupian citrus cropping systems were: i) the inability to mechanise many fields due to steep slopes and stony soils; and ii) the lack of producer-specific skills regarding the use of chemicals in the management of orchards.Based on these results, it was collectively agreed that the focus of the redesign process should be on the development of an alternative low-chemical weed control management strategy that would be compatible with the absence of mechanisation on the farms (Le Bellec et al. 2011). Five weed control prototypes were jointly designed as well as two multicriteria assessment tools. Results indicated that farmers involved in the study independently transferred the new technique to their own farms, and as such automatically became pilot farmers. The DISC method created an ongoing dynamic relationship between agricultural and public stakeholders that enabled them find solutions that can be continuously adjusted to stakeholder's, expectations (Le Bellec et al. 2012). Blazy et al. (2010) and Archimede et al., (2012) performed an ex ante assessment of agroecolgical innovations in banana production in Guadeloupe using modelling. In the case of Blazy et al., (2010), BANAD was used. This is a computer bioeconomic model that jointly simulates bioeconomic and 'technico-economic processes' of resource management at the farm level for assessing several innovative prototypes of environmentally-friendly management systems. The outputs of the BANAD model are dynamic, and based on a weekly time-step. They also include information on the banana production, cash flows, workload and environmental impacts (Figure 9.7). The inputs of the model are the: (i) farm's economic, technical and environmental characteristics; (ii) innovative crop management system parameters; and (iii) policy and market conditions (Blazy et al. 2010). On the other hand, the model employed by Archimede et al. ( 2012) was a mechanistic model, which was conducted at the farm level. The outputs of this model are also dynamic, but are however based on a yearly time-step and relative to the crop production (total level of biomass of the land fallow and of each compartment of the banana plant including marketable and non-marketable fruits) and animal production (desired stocking rate of animals for the required meat production). The main input data were the total area An innovative organic banana system consisting of an improved fallow with Crotalaria juncea, intercropped with C. ensiformis, new hybrid cultivar, and organic fertilisation, with no chemical inputs, was assessed on three different farm types (characterised according to their biophysical and economic parameters). These parameters included the physical state of the land, and the parasite load, climate and soil types, crop rotation, management decision rules and manpower characteristics (cost and efficiency). Using a similar methodology, Archimede et al. ( 2012) studied the opportunity to transform monoculture banana farms into mixed farming systems with ruminants feeding on banana by-products (leaves, pseudostems and non-marketable fruits), and forage from land left fallow to break the cycle of the nematode R. similis.Five theoretical farm types were established based on the following: presence or absence of the fallow, and the type of ruminants used (i.e. cattle, sheep, or goats). Blazy et al. (2010) found that the impacts of agroecological innovations vary considerably according to: i) the farm type in which the innovation is integrated; ii) the nature of the agroecological innovations; and iii) the criteria considered and the time span of the assessment. The study conducted by Archimede et al. (2012) also revealed that increasing farming system sustainability through alternatives such as using fallow land (rotation) and the integration of ruminant production is feasible from a biotechnical point of view. The methodology employed by these two groups facilitated a rapid assessment of the relevance of innovations under 'real' farm conditions. Such assessment studies would be almost impossible to be made through on-farm trials, and so are more easily accommodated via the utilisation of computer models. This approach would enable the development of policy initiatives to promote the adoption of environmentally-friendly innovations, which for the sake of completeness would still require on-farm validation by stakeholders.Agriculture in the region is extremely diverse and mainly driven by mixed farming systems which include crops and livestock and is practised mainly by rural households. This type of agriculture has nevertheless been excluded for a long time from the political, scientific and technical spheres, giving way to the promotion of export crops. Today, in light of the MEA, the complex diversity and multifunctionality of such agricultural systems is being promoted as an innovative approach to renew productive practices for a sustainable development. Researchers in the region are now able to offer different methodologies to design innovative systems corresponding to the current societal expectations, which can either be gradual (step by step), or sudden (de novo). These have been tested in Guadeloupe in response to certain phytosanitary restrictions faced by the banana and citrus farmers. Other countries This chapter considers the challenge of creating a sustainable supply of food for local consumption in the Caribbean with some potential for export. While it is important to note recent trends in large-scale production, including a long decline in plantation systems geared for the export of single crops, and more recent attempts to boost commercial farming for delivery to niche export markets, the focus here is not primarily on commercial or export agriculture. Rather, the chapter looks at recent and emerging efforts to implement non-traditional systems geared for small-scale farming. These systems are aimed at strengthening local food security and adapting traditional farming methods in the face of rapidly changing climates. In the context of this chapter, traditional agriculture is considered as the cultivation of crops in the ground, depending mainly on rainfall and with minimal use of irrigation. It is a system practiced widely for the past several decades and even centuries in the Caribbean.The following pages focus mainly on the production of food crops, with some mention of livestock. Drawing mostly on examples from the Eastern Caribbean and Haiti, the authors describe a range of non-traditional techniques currently being developed in the region. A more detailed look at one non-traditional approach spearheaded by researchers in St Kitts and Nevis is then provided. This system, founded at Clarence Fitzroy Bryant College (CFBC) in St Kitts is now poised for implementation in Nevis, Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana and Haiti. It agriculture shade house technology with a combination of hydroponics, organoponics, and hybridponics growing systems. The prospect summed up in the conclusion is to confront barriers of regional fragmentation and vulnerability with regional collaborations that transfer knowledge, adapt it to community-based needs, and improve food security and social resilience at the local level throughout the Caribbean.In most Caribbean countries, particularly in the smaller island nations, food imports have been increasing while exports of agricultural products have been decreasing, as seen in Figure 10.1. The situation in St Kitts and Nevis as illustrated in Figure 10.2 is typical of the trend among its Caribbean counterparts. Agricultural production for local consumption has also been decreasing and, in the case of St Kitts and Nevis, the contribution of agriculture to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) accounted for only 4.5 percent in 2000, with sugar cane accounting for close to half of that amount.Many Caribbean economists, historians, and other writers on the political economy of agriculture in the region (Marie 1979;Codrington 1984;Marshall 1991;Barrow 1992;Beckford 1994) have pointed out that plantation systems for commercial crops such as sugar and bananas tended to de-emphasize food production for local consumption thereby creating a dependence on imports. Indeed, the plantation economies have shaped Caribbean agriculture practices for centuries with an export-oriented focus on cash crops, while local food production remained minimal. Given the legacy of the plantation system, Caribbean people often find themselves without the necessary mindsets or practical models to develop and implement new approaches to growing food, making the problem of local food production an even more severe challenge. The plantation system, while it casts a long historical shadow, was in decline more than a century before the recent final closure of sugar mills in Barbados, Trinidad and Toboago, and St Kitts and massive down-sizing in other countries. As many as five decades ago, some Caribbean countries began making attempts to manage the shift away from plantation economies and simultaneously address the problem of local food production. Initially, these efforts took place within a framework of agricultural diversification, and more recently have been motivated by additional concerns about food security and rapidly intensifying climate change.According to Wilson and Bekele (1999), agricultural diversification refers to increasing the range of agricultural output at farm, sectoral or regional levels either through expanding the number of crop or livestock species produced, or by vertical integration of one or more species into a diversified product mix, through processing. With such processing, diversification could also be achieved by internationally sourcing raw material, e.g. fresh fruit to achieve all year manufacture of products for an export market or continuous supply of local demand.Beginning in the mid-1960s and carrying through to the late-1990s, studies undertaken at the Caribbean Community Secretariat, the Faculty of Agriculture of the University of the West Indies (UWI), and the Caribbean Food and Nutrition Institute (CFNI) indicate both the technical and economic feasibility of substantially increased production of food in the countries of the region. Under the rubric of 'agricultural diversification ', Demas (1987) and Wilson and Bekele (1999) elaborated planning strategies to manage a shift away from the plantation model of Caribbean agriculture. Three main elements in a successful approach to diversified farming were proposed by Demas (1987). First is the intensification of traditional crop production by increasing productivity through technologically advanced farming practices and irrigation, and by adding value through further processing, thereby generating alternative products from the raw material of traditional crops. Second, is the increased production of non-traditional crops for national and regional consumption, and third, is the increased production of non-traditional crops for export to extra-regional markets. Wilson and Bekele (1999) recognized the existence of operational models for expanding the export of niche products such as hot peppers, aloes, and Sea Island cotton, and for increasing the productivity of crops and livestock for local food markets throughout the region. Arguing that claims about agricultural diversification remain arbitrary and subjective without the use of quantitative models to determine whether or not diversification has taken place, Wilson and Bekele (1999) also contributed more quantitative assessment tools to measure productivity, sustainability, competitiveness, and flexibility.Agricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food Production Trejos and de las Casas (1997) argued for hemispheric integration to boost food production, as well as for a comprehensive model of sustainable development resting on three pillars: participation by producers and organizations; reconversion of production structures, to make them more efficient when overhauled, and enable products to secure a better market position, while conserving resources and increasing equity; and institutional transformation for the improvement of their ability to respond to the demands and needs of agricultural producers and to serve as facilitators to streamline relations among institutions in the framework of sustainable development.Against the backdrop of these preceding decades of scholarship on efforts to shift Caribbean agriculture by introducing the need for sustainable food production practices, Naraine (2005) surveyed the state of domestic agricultural production in St Kitts. Historically dominated by the oldest sugar plantation system in the region, monocrop cultivation occupied the major portion of arable land and the most productive soils, leaving food crop and livestock production to peasant farmers on the fringes with small, scattered land holdings. Over the decades, farmers toiled against the vagaries of weather, mostly on hillsides, and depended on rain-fed systems to a large extent. Traditional producers also faced declining soil fertility on already marginal land, poor infrastructure, outmoded technology, lack of service support and expertise, and lack of sufficient institutional support from either governmental entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), or community based organizations (CBOs). In addition, lack of access to credit, low prices for their produce with seasonal oversupply which was quickly followed by scarcity in offseason periods, lack of marketing systems, nuisances of dog attacks on livestock, monkeys and stray-roaming livestock feeding on food crops, and, not infrequently, environmental disasters attributed to severe storms and hurricanes, have all compounded to negatively impact agricultural development. More recently, the issue of competition with lowerpriced imported produce at the market highlighted some of the disadvantages associated with globalization. Opening up national boundaries and lowering tariffs to increase trade constitute a cost to local companies that are, in most cases, ill-equipped to compete at the global level and are therefore marginalized (Barker 2012). Naraine (2005) evaluated the extent of agricultural diversification in St. Kitts using an adapted version of the Shannon Index of Entropy (SIE), represented by the formula (Masisi, et al. 2008):where, (I t ) is a measure of diversification in agricultural systems, using as the basic factor, the proportion of total revenue, p it from the i th (i =1,2,…n, where n ≥ 1) agricultural commodity in year (t). Thus, a perfectly diversified agricultural system would have an entropy index of log (n) and a perfectly specialized system with one commodity an index of zero (0), with the parameters for evaluating diversification to include: productivity, sustainability, competitiveness, and flexibility. This model may be adapted to calculate diversification (SIE) for individual countries or the Caribbean, collectively. However, diversification at the regional or national level alone is not sufficient to measure the success of agricultural diversification in the Caribbean. Naraine (2005) further argued that the success of the sector depends on the individual success of farmers or enterprises, and that national or regional success hinges upon the cumulative effect of individual productivity, sustainability, competitiveness, and flexibility.Applying the SIE, Naraine (2005) found a low level of diversification of approximately two crop types at the enterprise level in St Kitts in 2005, affecting food production. The optimum determined by the SIE is five crop types (leafy greens, beans, ground provisions, tomato, herbs and peppers) that would correlate with optimum productivity, particularly when there is a total of approximately five crop and livestock types combined. Such integrated farms benefit from sustainability with multiple revenue streams, ecological considerations with effective recycling, and flexibility when faced with varying market changes.In the intervening decade, discussions have shifted away from viewing Caribbean agricultural diversification as a way of replacing foreign exchange losses due to failing export crops. Instead, there has been greater emphasis on boosting local production through developing non-traditional farming techniques. Because of this, SIE results may now vary, and current data, if gathered for the same variables as in 2005, may reveal that diversification has improved with a corresponding improvement in food production with the introduction of the non-traditional systems identified later in this chapter. Trotz (2007) asserts that over the last 15-20 years, climate change has emerged as a major concern for small-island and low-lying coastal developing states of the Caribbean region. Impacts ranging from loss of life and food security to saltwater intrusion into aquifers and breakdown of law and order may be extended to Small Island Developing States (SIDS) throughout the world.The intensification of these trends is confirmed in recent reports from the National Academy of Sciences ( 2013) and the Royal Society (2014). Barker (2012) directly links climate changes to a crisis in Caribbean agriculture, as increasingly irregular rain patternsAgricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food Production and more extreme tropical weather events compound the stresses and shocks imposed by globalization. With the view that climate change is negatively impacting the physical environment and, in turn, human lives, livelihoods, and biodiversity, it is prudent for all societies to act to minimize the impacts upon the environment and communities.Minimizing impacts is typically achieved with mitigation, but there is a growing trend with the adaptation approach to climate change. Mitigation tends to be more of a reactive approach, while adaptation, by making decisions with foresight based on potential risks, is essentially proactive and can be more feasible and effective towards long-term solutions. Simoes et al. (2010) identified the characteristics and benefits of adaptation to climate change, using examples from northeast Brazil. The main lesson to be learned from that case is the need for building adaptive capacity at all educational and skill levels, both formal and non-formal. Adaptive capacity is essential for people in communities to adapt to changing climatic conditions and related environmental degradation.The immediacy of climate change and the need to adapt adds another layer of urgency to the question of agricultural diversification, and it was with that in mind that faculty and students at the CFBC, St.Kitts-Nevis, have experimented since 2006 with non-traditional plant growing systems as an adaptation strategy to climate change. They have developed growing systems (hydroponics, organoponics, and hybridponics) that demonstrate documented high productivity, despite the challenges encountered by Caribbean farmers due to climate change impacts, land scarcity and competition with other sectors for land, and a host of other environmental and human impacts that negatively affect production of garden vegetables.From 2010 forward, the CFBC collaborated with researchers and students from the University of Central Florida to move beyond experimentation by demonstrating 'proof of concept' on a production-scale design of growing systems. In addition to building shade house growing systems for hydroponics (44.6 m 2 ) and organoponics (37.2 m 2 ), and using them in tandem to create a novel hybridponics growing method, faculty-student teams have conducted marketing research in the field to generate a model for commercializing crop outputs and estimating livelihood potential. The data presented in student research submitted for the Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Exam (CAPE © ) assessments and at the 2013 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Subregional Conference on Environmental Policy and Planning for the Caribbean indicated that output from this system is profitable enough to generate a competitive income of more than EC$2,000 (US$740) per month. This system is profiled in greater detail in the following discussion, but first we present a survey of recent efforts to develop non-traditional techniques throughout the region.In addition to the techniques of hydroponics, organoponics and hybridoponics proposed in this chapter, there are several relevant examples of non-traditional agricultural practices throughout the region, which offer the opportunity to use new varieties and move away from the traditional plantation-style monoculture systems. Additionally, these practices are less tedious and therefore more attractive to youth who are less inclined to venture into the traditional drudgery of plantation-style or open-field farming. Several new and improved techniques have been introduced to the region within the last 20 years. In the case of crops for example, varietal trials, tissue culture, protected agriculture systems and low-cost alternatives, coordinated urban and peri-urban systems in the form of backyard and school gardens, and hydroponics have been implemented to increase food production. For livestock, artificial insemination is being used in St Kitts and Nevis to reduce the importation of live animals.Varietal trials are useful for the introduction of new cultivars (commonly referred to by producers as varieties) to the agricultural sector, which are chosen for optimum performance in the field, high yields and market acceptance. Varietal trials require controlled conditions and consistent data collection, and in the case of St Kitts and Nevis, with a hot, dry climate, the selection of heat tolerant cultivars is important. Farmers have reported that the annual drought is longer and the annual rains during the rainy season have become progressively more intense within the last 10 years, something which is evidenced by the frequency of forest fires during the dry periods and the increasing intensity of flooding throughout the region. The Department of Agriculture (DoA), St Kitts and Nevis, embarked on a series of varietal trials to select the most suitable varieties for production of various crops.There are many heat tolerant varieties on the market internationally with new ones being released frequently; therefore, it is important to research the varieties before selection. Varieties may be determinate (the plant dies after a single fruiting), or indeterminate (plants continue to grow and fruit until killed or removed by grower). As these require different management techniques, growers must determine which type is most suitable for their application. Determinate varieties require minimal staking or support and minimal pruning. Indeterminate varieties require extensive support and pruning, and although removal of suckers is highly recommended, it is not mandatory. It is important to choose high quality seed from reputable seed companies to attain best seed germination and crop productivity.Agricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food ProductionFor uniformity, areas should be selected that are free from shade and level where possible, otherwise, the field should be divided into blocks with uniform characteristics before planting. The soil should be tilled and banked in rows with 0.91 m spacing between ridges to allow for adequate drainage. Rows should run in the direction of the contours whenever possible to reduced erosion. Drip irrigation tubing of 1.3 cm diameter should be used with 45.7 cm spacing between emitters. Rows should be covered with plastic mulch to reduce weeds and water loss due to surface evaporation. The size of the trial plot would be determined by the number of varieties to be tested.General seed germination practices should be followed to ensure seedling uniformity. Firstly, calculate the number of seeds to sow for each variety depending on number of replications. More replications are required if the field is not uniform as the field will need to be divided into blocks. Sterilise seedling trays, mix growing media (e.g. ProMix ® ), with slow release fertiliser and apply evenly to seedling trays, and place one seed per cell. Finally, cover the seeds with a light covering of growing media and water gently to prevent seeds from being dislodged from the cells. Ensure only one cultivar is sown per tray and that trays are properly labelled with the cultivar name. Trays may be placed in a germination chamber or shade house dedicated to seedling germination. The seedlings should be frequently checked to ensure the media is sufficiently moist. Once plants have achieved three to four true leaves and attain a height of 10-15 cm they may be transplanted to the field.For a uniform field, varieties should be randomly assigned to rows using random number tables. For a field with blocks, varieties should be assigned randomly to rows within blocks. A field map should be prepared to record the layout of the varieties, and standard fertilisation practices should be employed. Seven to ten days after transplanting, a complete fertiliser should be applied. About six weeks after transplanting, at the onset of flowering, a potassium-rich fertiliser should be applied to encourage flowering and fruit set. Data collection for each cultivar should include pest resistance, crop yield, and presence of wilting and nutrient deficiency. In keeping with good agricultural practices, records should be kept on inputs for calculation of the cost of production. Market acceptability and organoleptic (taste) assessments are required to determine the suitability of the best performing varieties for introduction to the market.In 2013, the DoA, St. Kitts and Nevis, successfully tested four Israeli tomato cultivars to replace the commonly used Heatmaster and Heatwave. The cultivar HA3080 had the lowest yields, while HA3019, HA3057, and HA3091 had similar yields to Heatmaster (Table 10.1). hormones, the latter two of which are used to regulate the growth and development of the cultured plants. The media are available pre-packaged, from a number of international suppliers. 1 Alternatively, media recipes can be found in several publications, for example, Saad and Elshahed (2012). Great care must be taken when preparing media. The order of addition of components must be strictly followed to prevent undesirable side reactions and precipitation of salts. Once prepared, media must be sterilised either by filtration, ultraviolet light, or autoclaved (steam steriliser or pressure cooker), and then decanted into the desired culture container (e.g. test tubes, petri-dishes, baby food jars, magenta boxes).All steps from the sterilisation of plant material to root initiation need to be performed in an enclosed lab environment using a specialised piece of equipment, the laminar flow hood, in which air flow is in one direction toward the user. The sterilised plant material is cut into smaller pieces (explants) and placed on culture media and observed daily for signs of growth and contamination. If contamination occurs, remove the contaminated container, autoclave and discard the material. Culture containers may be re-used if they are made of glass or specialised plastic. Growing cultures may be sub-divided and placed on fresh media every three to four weeks depending on the rate of growth, a process called sub-culturing. Because nutrients in the medium are used by the explant, therefore frequent sub-culturing is necessary.After several rounds of sub-culturing, shoots are transferred to a rooting medium, which may or may not contain the plant growth regulators, auxin or cytokinin, or a combination of both. This is dependent on the plant in culture, and has to be optimised for each plant type. Rooting cultures are then hardened or acclimated through a series of steps. The total number of steps in the process is again determined by the plant type.Box 10.1 outlines the key benefits and limitations associated with the adoption of tissue culture.Examples of international suppliers include: Phytotechnology In St Lucia, within the Tissue Culture Unit, Department of Agriculture, Propagation Division, the tissue culture facilities were upgraded. The lab now produces high quality disease-free material for propagation and germplasm conservation. Over 200,000 tissue-cultured plants are produced annually; however, the facility has the capacity to produce 500,000. The main commodities are banana, yam and orchid. In 2013, orchid production was self-sustaining in that the revenue generated from the sale of orchids was sufficient for equipment and lab maintenance and employee salaries. In St Vincent and the Grenadines, tissue culture facilities were upgraded in 2012. The tissue culture lab actively micro-propagates and distributes roots and tubers, and planting material both locally and regionally. Cassava, yam, sweet potato and dasheen plantlets (micro-propagated plants) have been distributed regionally to members of the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), Jamaica and Barbados (CARDI Bi-Weekly 2014).The major challenge faced was in the distribution and acclimation of material, resulting in distributed plantlets dying in several of the receiving territories. The limited number of adequately trained personnel to manage the acclimation of the plantlets is one area that therefore needs to be addressed.Protected agriculture has been reintroduced into the Caribbean region with the construction and commissioning of several tropical greenhouses to increase year-round local production and reduce imports (Table 10.3). In 2012, the largest fully temperaturecontrolled greenhouse in the region was constructed in St Kitts with ICDF, Taiwan.In 2010, the Agricultural Resource Management (ARM) Project, funded by the Sugar Industry Diversification Foundation (SIDF), embarked on a project to fund the reintroduction of greenhouse farming to St Kitts and Nevis. The initial project included the construction of ten dams and four demonstration greenhouses with drip irrigation and water storage systems. By 2014, eight greenhouses in St Kitts and two in Nevis were completed. Farmers were provided with the infrastructure, supplies and training to operationalize the systems. The objective was that farmers will adopt the technology and take full responsibility for the greenhouses at the end of the project. Greenhouse cultivars (hybrid seeds) of tomato, sweet pepper, lettuce and cucumber were imported for planting in the greenhouses. The structures were outfitted with fertigation systems (irrigation and fertiliser mixer) and timers. In the initial phase, because in-soil planting was used, rows were prepared and covered with plastic mulch and drip lines (micro-irrigation) for precision watering. | 317Agricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food ProductionIn Haiti, as part of the WINNER program, a five-year project sponsored by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and implemented by the development contractor Chemonics, as many as 1,000 greenhouses were constructed during 2012-13 period. The programme is not without controversies related to the distribution of Monsanto seeds treated with potentially toxic pesticides and herbicides (Innocent 2011;'Monsanto in Haiti' 2011), inconsistent delivery of promised storage supplies (Lentfer 2013), alleged by-passing of the Haitian Ministry of Agriculture (Center for Economic Policy and Research 2011) and an overall approach that threatens to displace long-standing peasant association networks with US-style agribusiness (Yaffe, 2011). WINNER does, however, represent an attempt to boost higher-scale commercial production, partly through greenhouse protected agriculture, and deliver that produce to local consumers through outlets such as the new weekly Mache Peyizan market in Tabarre ('WINNER's Farmers' Market Delivers on Expectations' 2012).In St. Kitts, sweet pepper and tomato production fluctuated greatly from 2004 to 2012 (Figure 10.3), however, in 2013, a 25 percent increase in sweet pepper and a similar 20 percent increase in tomato production were realised (Jackson 2014). Since the increase in cash crop production corresponded to the commissioning of the greenhouses, it can be concluded that the greenhouse crop cultivation contributed to the increase in production of these crops. Protected agriculture: shade house models Haiti and St. Kitts and Nevis have also seen the implementation of another kind of smallscale protected agriculture based on shade houses that retain the protective roofing and walls of the greenhouse model but forego energy-intensive climate control systems and instead allow air to pass through walls. The University of Nouvelle Grand'Anse (UNOGA) is a small private university that shares a 8.5 ha campus with the Fondation Nouvelle Grand'Anse (FNGA), headquartered in Dekade, along the Grand'Anse river, 9 km southeast of Jeremie, the provincial capital. In order to develop new income generating activities, and to present farmers with a new and more profitable method of farming, faculty and students at UNOGA partnered with technicians from FNGA to install a shade house and test the results of protected vegetable production. During this process, tomatoes, carrots, chard, cabbage, and hot pepper have been tested under the shade house. The most recent harvest data for February-March 2014 indicate that 109 kg of hot pepper (Habanero) were collected from 46 plants.Inside a previously constructed shade house of 200 m 2 , a drip irrigation system was installed, and distribution pipes were connected to water tank of 2,272l capacity. The water tank used gravity to provide water to the test crops, though some electric power was needed to pump water from the river to a main concrete water tower connected to the campus pigsty. Six in-ground beds were prepared with two drip irrigation lines each. Each bed was seeded with one different vegetable -carrot, chard, cabbage, and hot pepper -and tomatoes were seeded to two beds, and the test crops irrigated for 4 hours twice a week.The testbed system from Dekade (Figure 10.4) was replicated at a more remote site near Pic Makaya (Figure 10.5) in southern Grand'Anse with participation of another peasant community and support provided by UNOGA faculty and FNGA technicians.As part of the experiment, researchers collected qualitative data on how local farmers perceived the non-traditional system. Most farmers can be described as small-scale and vulnerable with farms between 0.5 and 1.5 ha in size, and typically situated on eroded land. Farmers noted several general benefits and limitations of shade house protected farming when compared with traditional open-air, rain-fed agriculture (Box 10.2).Participants were also asked to analyse how this system specifically could be adapted to the conditions and environment of peasant farmers in rural Haiti. They produced the following list of additional benefits and limitations (Box 10.3).Agricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food Production Box 10.2: Benefits and Limitations of Shade House, Protected Farming Compared to Traditional Open-Air, Rain-Fed Agriculture Benefits:• Optimal plant productivity• Faster maturity (especially cabbage)• Easy control of weeds and insects• Higher yield per unit area• Economic profitability• Reduction of direct exposure to sun• Reduction of evaporation • Easy to maintain• The farmer has more time for other activities, such as livestock• Better economic returns and opportunity to grow more profitable crops than beans and corn• High installation cost means the farmers will not undertake such an activity without additional support• The issue of identifying appropriate cultivars• New agricultural practices and training would be required for peasantsIn addition to the CFBC hydroponics system, two alternate hydroponic farms were established in St Kitts and Nevis. The Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Program (STEP), a joint venture between the Ministry of Agriculture and the Department of Education, was launched in 2012 with young males as the major beneficiaries. The program provides training in crop production using a vertical hydroponics system as a platform for enterprise development. Crops are grown in vertically stacked pots filled with coconut mesh housed in open-sided shade houses with a reflective porous roof. Vertical drip lines are installed in the stacked pots, and fertigation is fully automated (Figures 10.6A and 10.6B). The program has been hailed a success as there is a steady supply of produce sold to local restaurants and supermarkets. The major crops produced include tomatoes, lettuce, squash and beets, and there is an occasional demand for micro-greens (juvenile plantlets often eaten raw in salads).Agro-processing of non-traditional products like flour from breadfruit, cassava, and sweet potato has become an important component for revenue generation in the Caribbean region. Establishments such as the Trinidad and Tobago Agribusiness Association (TTABA), the National Agricultural Marketing and Development Corporation (NAMDEVCO) of Trinidad and Tobago, and the Agro-processors' Cooperatives of St. Kitts and Nevis, produce such commodities as alternatives to already existing products. In addition, these products have a higher nutritive value than the more refined products gracing the supermarket shelves. Successful agro-processing requires adequate facilities for processing and storage. However, a consistent theme throughout the region is the limited access to funding and support for acquisition and training for personnel. This problem was somewhat alleviated in 2014 in St Kitts and Nevis, when the storage facilities for value-addition to some crops were upgraded.Researchers and students at the University of Nouvelle Grand' Anse (UNOGA), Jeremie, Haiti, have been successful in producing breadfruit flour and marketing it as a food tourism souvenir product. It has also been introduced on a limited basis in the United States as an artisanal grain substitute popular with those who prefer gluten free diets or the so-called Paleo-diet. UNOGA researchers have also had experimental success developing a dried fruit roll and energy bar by combining fruits and vegetables in a boiling pot then drying out the paste and shaping it as needed.| 321Within the broader context of non-traditional agriculture adaptations reviewed above, researchers, students, government agencies, NGOs, businesses and community-based stakeholders have partnered to develop a new system that combines several techniques. This approach blends shade house protected agriculture with a combination of hydroponics, organoponics, and hybridponics growing systems. The sections that follow provide more detail on the different systems with emphasis on key aspects of hydroponic growing (effective plant combination, choice of growing medium, and managing nutrient solutions), data on plant productivity, and a commercialization model.Hydroponics can be defined as a technique used to grow plants without soil, in a system containing the following elements: the root zone, the aerial organs of the plant, an irrigation system to supply nutrient solution to the root zone, and a drainage system for dealing with runoff (Schröeder and Leith 2002). In the CFBC adaptation model in St Kitts, these components were adapted to include the use of an electric pump to continuously circulate nutrient solution over the root system of plants located in a growth medium and protected by a shade house enclosure.Researchers and students began by creating three small systems on the main campusone traditional, one organoponics, and one hydroponics-to compare various aspects of plant growth across systems. A series of six field observations of these on-campus growing systems were conducted to collect and compare a wide spectrum of data related to plant productivity. While the full results are available in a longer paper (Thomas 2010), the actual field reports (in their unedited form) from visits numbered 1, 5 and 6, are presented on the following pages. To measure the height of plantThe height of the plants was measured. 4.3 cm 4.8 cm 0.4 cm 1.5 cm At this visit, the plants within the organoponics system were transplanted at three weeks old. These were grown in vitro before they were transplanted. Figures 10.7A and 10.7B show the size of the plants at the point of transplantation. The first measurements were recorded a week afterwards when they were four weeks old. By means of comparison to week three, there was vigorous growth of the plants in all aspects of the plants shown in this system. The colours of the stems and the leaves of the two plants were ideal based on the proposed/standard look of the ideal as indicated previously. The measurements for the hydroponics plants however were recorded from the first week of growth. There was growth. The colours of the two plants matched those which were proposed in the same section as above.To measure the width of plant To examine the types of pests presentThe plants were examined for the presence of pests.No pests were found on the plants.No pests were found on the plants. There were no pests found in neither system. When plants begin to germinate, they have large stores of sucrose in their roots for proper root growth. Without efficient growth of the roots, plants' development will be restricted, growth will be stunted and photosynthesis will be prohibited. There are no large food stores in the stems of these plants at these stages. Hence, pests will not gain adequate food and thus they avoid these crops and seek others. Moreover, some diseases such as mosaic are caused by other organisms. There were no adverse effects of pests or diseases on the plants.To determine the extent to which the pests impact the plantsThe impacts that pests had on the plants were recorded. There were no impacts caused by pests.There were no impacts induced by pests.To examine the types of diseases presentThe plants were examined for the presence of diseases.There were no diseases that were examined on the plants.There were no diseases that were examined on the plants.To determine the extent to which these diseases impact the plantsThe impacts that diseases had on the plants were recorded. There were no implications since no diseases were recognized.There were no implications since no diseases were found.| 327 Parsleys and thymes were the pest control mechanisms in this system. Parsley and thymes were cultivated in the same medium near the plants that were observed. This was essential because as these 'two pests detractors' grew, they produced high levels of alkaloid and toxins within their leaves. Figure 10.7E shows how parsley leaves appear. They are so green because they are uninfested by pests and are disease resistant due to their large stores of alkaloid and toxins.In the event that any pest consume or taste-even this plant, they will be repulsed as it will taste bitter. This was strategically done because the taste is not enticing for pests and so, thymes and parsleys are undesirable for them. Since pests are the main sources of diseases, the plants are said to be disease-resistant also as they have dual effects in warding off pests and diseases simultaneously. Furthermore, five gallons of water was used for the organoponics system initially as plants did not require as much like in the latter stages at these early points of growth and development. Although the hydroponics system's reservoir maximum capacity was 40 gallons (as mentioned before) only 25 gallons was used as the number of baskets/cups used was reduced considerably by 30.To No Nitrates were added in solution. There was no urgency to add any nutrients to the systems at this first visit. However, prior to these visits, manure and bagasse ash were added to the soil in the Organoponics system. They contained NPK.There was no addition of the three nutrient solutions. Furthermore, the pH value of the Organoponics system was 7.5. According to the Ferry Morse Seed company Premium Soil Test Kit Lab Book, this range is not the most suitable for neither plant's growth at optimal levels (pH requirements noted before). Nevertheless, after four weeks, the plants still showed signs of growth and development. On the other hand, the solution for the Hydroponics at the first field visit appeared to be favourable for the lettuces being 7, but inappropriate for the basil plants. Although the pH value seemed to be inadequate, the basil crops still grew in the conditions that were presented to them. There were no pests found.Leaf miners and caterpillars found. No pests were found in this system at this visit. The only plants that seemed to be affected by pests and diseases were the organoponics basil. Caterpillars and leaf miners still affected these plants as there was an abundance of food sources present. Aphids are known to feed on plants once their food sources are sufficient. These were expected to be seen, but were not. It is possible that the time of visit was a factor and the inspection of the plants was insufficient.To determine the extent to which the pests impact the plantsThe impacts that the pests had on the plants were recorded.There were no impacts induced by pests.There were whitish-yellowish caused trails in the leaves caused by leaf miners.There were no impacts induced by pests.The plants were examined for the presence of diseases.There were no diseases seen.There were no diseases seen. There were no diseases seen.To determine the extent to which these diseases impact the plantsThe impacts that the diseases had on the plants were recorded.No pimplications since no diseases were found.There were no implications since no diseases found. There were no implications since no diseases were found.| 331 one. This was so because the reasons for the usages of these pest-resistant plants remained constant as they manufactured more and more alkaloids and toxins as they grew. In this way, the leaves kept detracting pests while they grow. Since pests are the vectors that transmit diseases, then the repelling of these pests prevented diseases also.To record the type of irrigation system usedThe type of irrigation system used was noted and the water quantity used was recorded. The drip irrigation system was used. Eighteen gallons were used for this visit. To measure the height of plantThe height of the plants was measured.There was a ten percent growth of the lettuce and a four percent growth of the basil. Plants started to slow in growth as the 'plateau' effect was taking place in which growth was minimal. This may the due to the deficiencies in nutrients as plants would have already utilized large quantities to get to these stages. It was also possible that they neared the point of maximal growth. The leaves and stem colours were ideal.To measure the width of plant The width of the plants was measured.To measure the length of longest leafThe length of the longest leaf was measured.19.6 cmTo measure the width of broadest leafThe width of the broadest leaf was measured.19.5 cmTo observe the colour of the stem The colour of the stem was observedTo observe the colour of the leaves The colour of the leaves was observed.Pests:To examine the types of pests presentThe plants were examined for the presence of pests.No pests were found in this system at this visit.The lettuce at this stage seemed to be unaffected. However, the aphids are likely to be in effect still because there are large stores of sucrose in the plants stems at this time. It is also possible that other organisms still invaded the system, but were not spotted upon the visit as this could have been a factor that influenced the results. Nonetheless, the diminishing of symptoms of diseases showed the plants recuperated. It can be that these deficiencies only occurred at the point in time because they were inaccessible to the plants at those specific times. The leaves, like in week four and five would have been bombarded by flies and thus causing leaf miners.To determine the extent to which the pests impact the plants The impacts that the pests had on the plants were recorded.There were no effects induced by pests since they were absent.There were whitish-yellowish caused trails in the leaves caused by leaf miners.To examine the types of diseases presentThe plants were examined for the presence of diseases.There were no diseases that were examined There were no diseases that were examined.To determine the extent to which these diseases impact the plants The impacts that the diseases had on the plants were recorded.There were no implications since no diseases were found.There were no implications since no diseases were found.| 335Agricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food ProductionTo record any pest control mechanisms Any biological control mechanism that was imposed was documented.Parsleys and thymes were used to resist pests.Parsleys and thymes were used to resist pests. The same biological pests control mechanisms were employed as in visit one. This was so because the reasons for the usages of these pestresistant plants remained constant as they manufactured more and more alkaloids and toxins as they grew. In this way, the leaves kept detracting pests while they grow. Since pests are the vectors that transmit diseases, then the repelling of these pests prevented diseases also.To record the type of irrigation system used The type of irrigation system used was noted and the water quantity used was recorded.The drip irrigation system was used. Twenty gallons were used for this visit.The reservoir of the hydroponics system contained water that was continuously recycled. The same 25 gallons of water was used in this reservoir even though its maximum capacity is 40 gallons.| 337Agricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food ProductionAdditional data from the initial phase of experiments are presented in the section on plant productivity later on, and indicate significantly enhanced productivity moving from traditional to organoponics to hydroponics. Having achieved the desired results, the research team re-designed the hydroponic system on a much larger scale. A semi-commercial hydroponic system was designed and built at the CFBC. It has an individual plant capacity of 300 plants but can accommodate as many as 1,200 plants, depending on the crop choice. Instead of adopting the typical system designs that already existed, the technology was adapted and simplified to reach the intended target population; low resource persons. In one adaptation, the CFBC system to utilized water straight from the municipal source, meaning no reverse osmosis system was needed to purify the water before nutrients are added and mixed.Researchers also managed to reduce the electrical components to just one commercial pump that can deliver 4, 921 l in circulation every hour at 167 watts. The question of algae growth as well as suitable O 2 levels for root development was satisfied with a high pressure piping system that was accomplished by simply reducing the pipe size 3.8 cm from the reservoir to the growth chambers at 0.95 cm. Chambers were designed to accommodate large rooting systems and withstand high water pressures by using 12.7 cm 2 x 12.7 cm 2 schedule 40 PVC. All seeds were sown directly into the hydroponics system in a growth media called clay pellets that are placed in a netted plastic cup 7.6 cm deep x 7.6 cm wide. These pellets have been used for the past six years and still can be used for some more years. The hydroponics system was also designed to be operated by one individual (male or female) who would be able to dismantle and relocate in 30 minutes or less when hurricanes threaten. During six years of operation, the research team successfully grew 16 crops as an adaptive feature, which included cultivars of the following: • Secondary formula: (0.88 ml/L -5.0 percent phosphoric acid, 4.0 percent potassium phosphate 0:5:4 (NPK) -1.5 percent magnesium phosphate, 1.0 percent potassium sulphate 5.0 percent calcium nitrate 0.1 percent potassium borate, 0.0005 percent cobalt nitrate, 0.01 percent copper• Trace formula: (0.99 ml/L -EDTA, 0.1 percent iron EDTA, 0.05 percent manganese EDTA, 5:0:4 (NPK) -0.0008 percent ammonium molybdate, 0.015 percent zinc EDTA The results of this experiment are presented in Table 10.5. When planting more than one crop in a hydroponics system, the dynamics concerning water and nutrient use can become very challenging. For example, if peppers and tomatoes are planted together in the same system, researchers found that peppers must be planted first. The rationale behind this is that tomatoes are considered vines and their growth rate compared to a pepper plant is much faster. The root system on a vine is better adapted for rapid growth and therefore the nutrient uptake is proportionally rapid. In a system where both plants are competing for the same nutrients, the more adapted and sensitized root system will be more efficient in accessing these available nutrients. Therefore a tomato would outgrow a pepper, causing the pepper to show signs of deficiency while the tomato is thriving.In terms of a strategy, the peppers should be planted before the tomatoes, allowed to establish themselves in the system for about two weeks, and then the tomatoes can be planted. This would ensure that the pepper plant will be able to access the nutrients asAgricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food Production well as the tomato during growth and development. If the number of crop types grown simultaneously is to be increased, then a clear understanding of the nutrient requirements for each plant must be understood and carefully worked out, probably through experimentation. The first step should involve examining each crop individually, and having an appreciation of their growing patterns before combining them with other crops. Crops that are in the same family often have similar growth patterns and nutrient requirements, so that for example, if tomatoes are being cultivated, then it would also be possible to grow eggplant, cucumber and melons. In like manner, lettuce can be combined with cabbage, broccoli and cauliflower.Pollination requirements are also factors that should be kept in mind when considering growing plants hydroponically, particularly when a secure location is used that restricts the entry of organisms beyond a certain size. If wind is allowed to penetrate the growing facility then wind pollination can occur. With crops like strawberries it is often necessary to release a bee inside the shade house to assist; one bee can pollinate over 600 flowers in a day. Where pollinators do not have access, and flowers are bisexual, it is also possible to hand pollinate the flowers by using a 'spin toothbrush'to massage the flowers and increase the likelihood of successful pollination.Plants in a hydroponic system are typically placed in an inert medium to stabilize them as circulating nutrient solution passes through the root network. Choosing a growing medium is dictated by the type of crops to be cultivated, and the growth period. Key determining factors include the potential environmental impact of a particular medium, as well as, productivity and time to harvest for a particular crop. Short-term crops like strings beans, lettuce and cucumbers have root systems that establish quickly. Lettuce for instance is better suited for rockwool as a medium because it only takes about 23-25 days to grow and harvest, and will need to be quickly and easily removed and replaced to keep the rotation from harvest to replant consistent. Other crops like cucumbers and beans have a three to four month growing cycle that requires a stronger anchoring medium. In that case, CFBC researchers found hydroton pellets to be most appropriate, though gravel, perlite and peat also have good anchoring properties.The goal with growing media is to choose one that supports as many project objectives as possible, namely those related to the environment (biodegradable and recyclable), time, quality and efficiency. Growth media should not be chosen based on price or ease of supply but rather on the basis of what is safest for plants to grow in and what has a minimal environmental impact when the medium is discarded.Crops that will only last a few weeks in the system are considered short term, and with such crops it is advisable to use a medium that can be removed from the hydroponic system quite easily without affecting the overall functioning of the system. For crops like lettuce, cabbage, broccoli for example, coconut chips or rockwool cubes are best suited. These media are biodegradable, which ensures that the environment remains safe when they are eventually discarded. Also, a fresh seedling can be placed directly into the harvested slot simultaneously to maintain a scheduled harvesting cycle. Media like gravel, hydroton pellets, perlite and peat are not advisable for short-term crops simply because the frequency of recycling is too short, and the process can become very labour intensive.Crops that will remain in a hydroponics system for 3-12 months, require a medium that can stand up to environmental elements, is recyclable, does not breakdown easily (which would affect the electro-conductivity (EC) readings), and allows a good gas exchange with the immediate environment. A medium that satisfies these characteristics is hydroton clay pellets, which have been tested and retested for more than six years of experiments at the CFBC. A variety of crops have been grown in the same hydroponics system and the initial pellets are still being used today. This medium also allows for the sowing of seeds like corn, peas, beans, cucumber, and peppers directly into the medium as is done in soil. After the crops are harvested, the cup of clay pebbles are simply taken out, and the old roots removed from between the pebbles, which are washed with a detergent, rinsed and replaced in the same cup which is returned to the system.Knowing how to mix minerals properly and adjust nutrient solution mixes is critical to successful hydroponic growing (LaPlace 2014). The nutrient solution to be used depends for example, on various indicators such as different planting scenarios and signs of nutrient deficiencies in plants to name a few. Although all plants of the same species respond similarly to nutrient stress, plants of similar species will often show significant differences in their nutrient use and efficiency. These result from differences in growth rate, root distribution, phase of development, and efficiency of nutrient uptake and utilization (as previously mentioned in the case of tomatoes and peppers growing together). In any given location, plants from one species may become nutrient-deficient, while those from another species, growing in the same environment right next to them, may not show any deficiency symptoms.Agricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food Production Growth rate also affects nutrient status. When the nutrient supply is low or barely adequate for growth under existing environmental conditions, many plants lower their growth rate to a level which can be supported by the available nutrient supply without displaying typical visual deficiency symptoms.When observed symptoms are the direct result of a nutrient deficiency, the required corrective actions are relatively simple. However, symptoms are often the result of interactions with other plant species in the same hydroponic system. Cohabiting plants may limit the availability of the nutrients to plants with a lesser-developed root system, leading to the expression of deficiency symptoms. For instance, as discussed above, if tomatoes and bell peppers are planted at the same time in a hydroponic system, the tomatoes will outgrow the bell peppers. This happens simply because the vine crops grow much more rapidly and therefore their nutrient uptake will also be more vigorous. Transition metals such as copper (Cu), zinc (Zn) and nickel (Ni) compete with iron (Fe) and each other for plant uptake. Competition for uptake is not specific to Fe but holds true for all mineral nutrients that are chemically similar and have similar uptake mechanisms. For example, if the availability of Cu or Zn is relatively less than that of (Fe), then excessive concentrations of some other metal such as Ni will induce a deficiency of one of these nutrients rather than Fe. In the case of the macronutrients, excessive amounts of magnesium (Mg) will compete with potassium (K) for uptake and can possibly induce a K deficiency. High Mg concentration can also induce a calcium (Ca) deficiency. Thus, nutrient deficiencies can be induced by a number of different mechanisms that together compound the limited availability of a given nutrient.The chemical make-up of the nutrient solutions is one of the most critical aspects of hydroponics production. Different plant combinations determine the mixture of nutrients and the ways in which plants both access and utilize the nutrients in solution. Plants remove substantial amounts of nutrients from the hydroponic solution during their normal growth cycle and many long-term environmental changes occur as a result of this process. The charge balance of the nutrient solution is maintained through the release of H+ and/or OH-ions. These H+ and OH-ions are released from the cations and anions contained in the nutrients absorbed by plants. For instance, when plants are fertilized with ammonia, they acquire most of their nitrogen in the form of the ammonium cation, rather than from the usual nitrate anion. Because nitrate is the main and only anion used by the plant in large amounts, the net result of this change is that during normal nutrient uptake the proton (H+) excretion will far exceed that of hydroxyl ions (OH-).In the case of vigorously growing plants, the amount of excreted protons can be sufficiently large, so that a decrease in the pH results, making the nutrient solution more acidic. The immediate effect on the nutrient solution may be favourable for some plants, especially acid-loving plants, making iron (Fe2 + ) more available, however, in the long run, lowering the nutrient solution pH can be deleterious to plants in that the availability of nutrients will change. A lower pH allows micronutrients to become locked out of solution, eventually resulting in deficiencies of nutrients such as Cu and Zn. Additionally, when the pH of the solution falls below 5, the solubility of manganese (Mn2 + ) can increase to such an extent as to become toxic to most plant growth.The second non-traditional technique examined in the CFBC model is organoponics. This section of the chapter defines the technique and describes the system design utilized by CFCB College researchers. Vandermeer (2004) describes organoponics as 'a system of urban organic gardens which often consists of low-level concrete walls filled with organic matter and soil, with lines of drip irrigation laid on the surface of the growing media. Organoponics provide access to job opportunities, a fresh food supply to the community, neighbourhood improvement and beautification of urban areas.' In Cuba where the system originated, organoponics was developed as a community response to lack of food security. Although it began as a system of organic gardening, it can be modified to introduce chemical fertilizers to maintain optimum nutrients for plant growth, but compost, animal manure and other organic matter are recommended to keep down input costs. Use is also made of long cement planting troughs and raised metal containers that are filled with composted sugar waste. In experimentation and public outreach events conducted by CFBC, researchers found that any available containers (new or used) may be utilized, including buckets, barrels, and large water bottles.At the CFBC, lettuce, tomatoes, basil, parsley, and seasoning peppers were grown intensively under this organic farming method, with the use of soil from abandoned sugarcane fields that were determined to be fertile based on simple field tests of soil (texture, moisture, structure, and presence of microbes). Planting trays were constructed from used marine plywood lined with construction plastic to prevent rapid decay of the plywood. TheAgricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food Production planting trays were filled with 1.3 cm gravel to a depth of 7.6 cm, and then overlaid with sand to a depth of about 5.1 cm to facilitate drainage (Figure 10.27).The planting trays were filled with soil to a depth of about 20.3 cm. Drip irrigation lines were installed about 30.5 cm apart in parallel lines where plants were to be cultivated.Based on the findings at the CFBC, it is recommended that trays should be constructed with light concrete panels with vertical sides and a V-shape at the bottom to accommodate a range of plants with varying root lengths. This design will also optimize drainage and lengthen the life-span of the trays. The growing systems were housed in a shade house in which the walls and roofing were comprised of 30 percent shadecloth/shademesh. It is also recommended that the roof is covered with polyliner or plastic to prevent the direct impact of rainfall, but with water catchment that can be used for irrigation. With the containerised planting trays, shadehouse, and drip irrigation, the water requirement can be controlled to minimize the use of water. When organoponic and traditional cultivation of plants were compared, the organoponic did better than the traditional. The time to harvest was about 30 percent faster for active plant growth and fruiting; harvests were more productive in a shorter time-span, and stems, leaves, and fruits were also about 15 percent larger in size. Plant growth and fruiting in the hydroponic system occurred 17.5 percent faster, resulting in a reduction in the time to harvest by approximately 50 percent , when compared to traditional cultivation.This term, hybridponics, was coined to describe a system in which a seedling is removed from a hydroponic system and transplanted in an organoponics system to complete the growth process. Where plants were transplanted, they displayed significantly-enhanced growth and development compared to similar plants grown exclusively in organoponics. The dynamics of soil chemistry and physics limit seedlings access of nutrients, due to the relative immobility of nutrients in the soil matrix (Resh 2013). Plants generally would not be able to access certain nutrients based on their inferior root development. When plants of the same age and species were taken from hydroponics and transplanted to containerized soil they developed much faster because of the advanced rooting system during their hydroponic germination. These seedlings were able to access nutrients that would have been otherwise unavailable to them if they had grown strictly in soil. Hydroponics, then, can be used to promote a healthy start and robust seedling development for plants that will ultimately grow in a range of soil-based systems. In both organoponics and hybridponics growing systems, plants are grown intensively for optimum utilization of space. Intensive cultivation also provides for symbiosis in which the diversity of plants can benefit from each other with respect to varying light/ shade requirements, nutrient requirements and uptake from various depths, and biological pest control mechanisms through which plants attract and/or repel various insects, both beneficial and harmful. Pest control can be enhanced by painting fence posts in various colours to attract a wider diversity of insects. While there was less incidence of pest infestation in the organoponics growing system than in the traditional system, natural pest control substances (e.g. solution from neem mixed with thyme and garlic) were adequate to deter white flies and black sooty mould. These occurred to a much lesser extent in this system compared to the traditional cultivation. In addition, caterpillars and cutworms were found in the traditional but not the organoponics growing systems.Agricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food ProductionFor any agricultural technique to have an impact on local food supply, it has to be implemented by growers and embraced by local retail and consumer networks. Along with optimizing the CFCB College model system, faculty-student teams from the CFBC and the University of Central Florida also used fieldwork marketing research to generate a model for commercializing crop outputs and estimating livelihood potential. Data collected on plant productivity and a commercial estimate of expected inputs and outputs associated with operating a hydroponic system are presented in the next section. The section then concludes with a discussion of macro-and micro-economic factors impacting this system when it is viewed as a business model. One set of productivity data was developed in the following way. Three small systems were designed and constructed to determine which growing system was the most suitable. Iceberg lettuce was chosen as the crop of choice because of its short growth period. The results after three trials are displayed in Table 10.6, while table 10.7 presents the profitability estimates for hydroponic production.The data presented above suggest that small-scale non-traditional agriculture has serious potential as a commercial endeavour that can improve livelihoods. Realizing that potential is a matter of entrepreneurship however, and the system must be operated as a business, shaped by macroeconomic and microeconomic forces. Based on interviews conducted among a number of local restaurants and store owners, it is clear that there is a preference for locally produced agricultural goods over those that were imported. At certain times of the year, because locally grown produce is simply not available, it becomes necessary to import produce. This however leads to a glut situation on the market, when there is a surplus of locally grown produce, which can be addressed by greater access to export markets. From a microeconomic perspective, the hybridponics system was found to be very profitable and easy to maintain. The start-up cost for a 6.1 m x 6.1 m system is divided into two parts: the hydroponics which cost EC$5,400.00 (US$2,000), and the organoponics, which cost EC$10,000.00 (US$3,704), totalling EC$15,400.00 (US$5,704). Although this may initially sound like a substantial amount of money, this sum is only paid once for start-up. The upkeep/maintenance cost of the system is EC$520.00 (US$193) monthly (i.e. EC$200.00 (US$74) for the organoponics system and EC$320.00 (US$119) for the hydroponics). A profit of EC$15,000.00/month (US$5,556/month) or EC$180,000.00/ annum (US$66,667/annum)) can be expected after the sum of EC$2,000.00 (US$740) is subtracted for labour costs. Another advantage of the system is that a labourer only spends maximum of two hours per day working in this system. To implement such a system, much less space is required compared to traditional farming methods. The yields from this system, however, can match those of traditional farms and the quality may even be better.The main disadvantage of the organoponics growing system is that it can be more costly with respect to initial input cost, compared to traditional growing systems. However, due to advantages associated with greater productivity, organoponics may prove more effective than traditional cultivation, with additional consideration of improved reliability and consistency of supply to the market and less impact of climate variability and weather conditions. The practice of organoponics can also be potentially more productive, along with its suitability for more widespread participation by a wider cross-section of people in rural as well as urban areas. Moreover, organoponics is less dependent on the fertile landAgricultural Diversification and Non-Traditional Systems for Sustainable Food Production and \"hard\" labour that characterize traditional cultivation. With such numerous advantages, organoponics appears to be a good adaptation strategy to climate change for food security, less impact on the environment, and less effect of the environment on food production than traditional food production systems.Serious barriers face any efforts to provide local Caribbean communities with food that is consistently healthy, abundant, and affordable. The research findings presented in this chapter has been generated through a process of collaboration among academics, government agencies, NGOs, students, businesses, and community based stakeholders. Through such collaborations, such barriers can be effectively overcome to achieve impacts that improve local food security across the Caribbean. Inadequate baseline information, poor financing and poor management of growing environments plague the application of non-traditional techniques in the agriculture industry. Insufficient technical support also plays a role in the limited success of these systems in the region. It is clear that there have been many successes. A major obstacle to adoption of these techniques is farmer buy-in and the part-time nature of farming in many territories. It is also true that farmers must see themselves as business persons first and not mere labourers (Barker 2012). Therefore, attitudes and perceptions form a key arena to address, and ensure successful implementation. However, the research and productivity-profitability estimates presented above suggest that non-traditional agriculture is indeed a viable business option for smallscale growers in the Caribbean.Protected agriculture already appears to be making an impact on local food supply in St Kitts and Nevis, as the improved figures for 2013 tomato and sweet pepper production suggest. Crucial to solidifying these gains locally will be fostering competent technical support and other forms of knowledge transfer, such as the ability to set-up and maintain non-traditional systems, reliable reporting on crop productivity and profitability, continuing development of agro-processing to deliver longer-lasting, value-added agricultural products to the local market, solid business planning at all levels of local agriculture, and more.The CFBC model reviewed in this chapter works to integrate development on all these levels. But projecting an inclusive, community-based model for local food production throughout the region faces other barriers of language, distance, underdevelopment, and political will, which have fragmented the Caribbean historically and threaten to impede wider implementation of non-traditional agriculture. Fortunately, the Organization of American States (OAS) has agreed to support the expansion of this model to four other Caribbean countries, and at a recent UNESCO meeting on climate change policy in Nevis, representatives from four additional island nations expressed interest in partnering with the CFBC research team. The prospect here is to confront barriers of regional fragmentation and vulnerability with regional collaborations that transfer knowledge, adapt it to communitybased needs, and improve food security and social resilience at the local level throughout the Caribbean.Agriculture has been an important part of the economy of Caribbean countries from the colonial period when plantation crops such as sugar cane, cocoa, and coffee were grown for the European market. After emancipation and during indentureship, peasant farming became more prominent among freed slaves and ex-indentured labourers. The peasant farms were small in size and consisted mainly of a mixture of vegetables, root crops and fruit trees. To allow for the increase in agricultural production from large-scale plantation crops and small-scale peasant farming many of the forests areas were cleared. In recent times, increases in land pressure, growing rural populations, deforestation, and environmental degradation have resulted in more fragile and marginal lands being subjected to intensive agricultural operations. Forests areas are increasingly under threat as a result of these pressures, and in many Caribbean countries, the designation of protected areas to safeguard the remaining forest has further marginalized hillside farmers by restricting the practice of shifting cultivation. Consequently, there is an urgent need to find sustainable methods of hillside cultivation. Several alternative landuse systems have been suggested for increasing agricultural production in the Caribbean region such as mixed and multiple cropping systems.In the mid-1970s, a number of ecologically sound and sustainable land-use systems integrating agriculture and forestry, were grouped together under the broad designation of 'agroforestry' (Nair 1993). This practice was initially promoted as an alternative to shifting cultivation in developing countries where increasing populations have effectively reduced the length of the cycle of forest regeneration or fallow. The incorporation of permanent tree crops into farming systems also assists small farmers in diversifying their production methods. Agroforestry systems also provide a source of food, job and income for many rural households. While agriculture is not a major source of income for the Caribbean countries (three to seven percent of GDP), it provides employment for about ten to 20 percent of the population across its two main sub-sectors -traditional and non-traditional. Countries produced many of their agricultural crops for local consumption and also exported some of their traditional or specialty crops which were mainly sugar cane, cocoa, and coffee.Trees also contribute to the productivity and sustainability of farming systems on marginal lands by enhancing the production of organic matter, maintaining soil fertility, reducing erosion and creating a more favourable microclimate for associated crops and livestock. The mixing of trees and crops can also reduce the need for fertilizers and pesticides. These services are beyond the direct production roles trees can play in supplying food, fodder, fuel wood, building materials, medicines, handicraft and other raw materials for rural industries. In today's modern world, there is competition for housing, industrialization, forestry, recreation and agriculture (both crop and livestock production). These must be balanced to have a harmonious relationship with the environment.This chapter on agroforestry serves to highlight the historical evolution of the system, provide a description of agroforestry systems and describe potential benefits of adopting agroforestry in the Caribbean region. It also gives a broad overview of agroforestry from an international perspective. It should be noted that while agroforestry provides many exciting opportunities for farmers, it is not a 'cure-all' for all our land-use problems. As with any other land-use option, agroforestry involves trade-offs, that is, some short-term gains may have to be given up for the sake of long-term sustainability. Throughout the chapter, references and examples are provided for countries belonging to the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). These 15 countries include Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago. The justification for defining the Caribbean as countries within the CARICOM is that most of the studies on forestry/agroforestry were organized by the CARICOM secretariat together with other global organizations, mainly the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).The aim of agroforestry is to optimize production based on the interactions between the components and their physical environment. It is a science, whereby benefits will only be obtained from using the correct combination of tree species, crops and/or livestock, together with best management practices. Agroforestry should be viewed as more than just a combination of trees/crops/livestock, but should strive to meet the specific needs of the individual, community and/or population.Agroforestry has been a fundamental part of the traditional food production systems throughout the Caribbean region for many years. The system of land use in the Caribbean was greatly influenced by the early European colonizers, who used the available arable lands and cleared the natural forest for cultivation of large expanses of monoculture crops for the European market. This system of food production therefore resulted in a decrease of biological diversity of the forest species on the islands. The European settlers also introduced tropical crops that were not native to the region (e.g. breadfruit) to provide food and thus reduce the cost of sustaining the slaves and indentured laborers.The traditional systems practiced in the Caribbean usually included forest, fruit, spice, and fodder trees, together with plantation crops such as cocoa, coffee, bananas and sugarcane. The main agroforestry systems in the larger acreages were cocoa/coffee grown under shade trees and forest plantations established using the Taungya system. This perennial system of cultivation was important due to the steep sloping hillsides/mountainous terrain found in some Caribbean islands. In smaller holdings, farmers practiced a system of multi-layered agroforestry using mahogany, cedar, breadfruit, mango, or coconut trees in the upper level; a middle layer of cocoa, coffee, bananas and fruit trees; and a lower level of vegetables and food crops (e.g. pigeon peas). This type of agroforestry allowed the farmer to have a regular source of income, until the perennial trees mature and producing economic products such as fruits or timber. Livestock was also used in the traditional systems, but mainly in the smaller Caribbean islands.Agroforestry is also promoted as a more sustainable and environment-friendly alternative to the traditional 'slash and burn' agriculture, especially for sloping lands. Slash and burn which was once widely practiced is no longer accepted since it involves the removal of trees, loosens the valuable top soil and promotes erosion especially on hillsides. In addition, the land quickly loses its fertility and farmers usually move on after a few years without reforesting the land.Agroforestry Systems and Practices in the Caribbean While 'slash and burn' agriculture involved moving from one location to another, more stable agricultural plantations existed in the form of estates. In managing cocoa and coffee estates in Trinidad, trees are planted for shade. In the early stages, immortelle was the species of choice. This was later replaced by more valuable timber species when it was realised that harvesting of the trees provided a good return. Factors such as larceny, scarcity of labour and urbanization were responsible for many estates becoming abandoned. Within recent times with a shortage of local hardwoods, many landowners seized the opportunity to sell their timber trees, for which they obtained good value. At present, several farmers have recognised the value of lumber and are reforesting their estates with valuable tree species as their main crop. While farmers await the maturation of the trees for harvesting, they plant cash crops such as plantains and bananas among the trees. Since the cash crops ensure that the farmer is more often on the estate, more attention is placed on other agronomic activities such as tree re-planting.The Caribbean region has seen limited development in the agroforestry sector over the decades. The focus on developing agroforestry systems began at a 1987 workshop in Jamaica, where various Caribbean countries reported on the status of the forestry/agroforestry sector. This workshop led to a joint CARICOM/FAO project to conduct studies on the status of the forestry sector (including agroforestry) in the Caribbean region. During the last 25 years there has been more attention to agroforestry as a sustainable land-use system in the Caribbean region. However, there is no established standard or criteria to promote agroforestry specifically, or to use it as a tool in land use planning.The CARICOM region spans a distance of over 4,000 km from the Bahamas in the north to Suriname in the south. The Bahamas consist of many islands located SE of Florida, USA and are mainly low-lying, dry and contain soils derived from limestone parent material. Most of the other CARICOM countries are located in the Caribbean Sea within latitudes of 10-20°N and longitudes of 59-78°W (figure 11.1). They form part of the Greater Antilles (Jamaica and Haiti), The Leeward Islands (Antigua and Barbuda, St Kitts and Nevis, Montserrat, and Dominica), and the Windward Islands (St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Barbados, Grenada, and Trinidad and Tobago. The Leeward and Windward Islands make up the Lesser Antilles. Belize is found in Central America while Guyana and Suriname are part of the South America mainland. The islands of St Kitts, Montserrat, and St Vincent forms part of the 'inner volcanic arc' and have active or potentially active volcanoes, while low-lying coral limestone islands such as Antigua and Barbados form part of the 'outer limestone arc'.In general, Caribbean landscapes were changed as native forests were cleared for plantation agriculture, especially sugarcane. This deforestation increased the risk of erosion and changed the nature of the land resources. When the land is cleared of vegetation it results in declined soil fertility due to increased organic matter decomposition and plant nutrient leaching. Presently, the land area covered by forests for Belize, Guyana and Suriname (continental countries) is 87.5 percent, while for the Caribbean islands (excluding Haiti) it is 40.4 percent (Table 11.1). Only 0.8 percent of Haiti's land area is under forest. In Haiti, impoverished peasant farming has enhanced environmental degradation. Forest trees are cut to provide firewood and steep slopes are cultivated which promote soil erosion and further environmental degradation. The total forested area in Trinidad and Tobago occupies about 226,000 ha or 44 percent of the total land area. The government (state) possesses about 80 percent of these forested lands while the remaining 45,000 ha are privately owned. Several of these private owners are being targeted by the Forestry Division to adopt more sustainably managed systems such as agroforestry.Most of the Caribbean islands have a marine tropical environment and average annual temperatures are about 26.7°C with little seasonal variation. The Northeast (NE) Trade winds modify the tropical heat year-round and produce most of the precipitation. Rainfall not temperature usually distinguishes the season. For example in Trinidad, there is a dry season from December to April and a rainy season from May to November. | 359Agroforestry Systems and Practices in the CaribbeanThe rainfall varies between the countries with low-lying islands receiving little rainfall, while islands such as Dominica with high volcanic peaks receive over 2500 mm of annual rainfall. Within the islands there is usually heavier rainfall on the northeast side (windward slopes) and less rain in the southwest side (leeward slopes). The distribution of rainfall is important since it determines if irrigation is necessary for agriculture and agroforestry systems. Almost every year from June to November, the Caribbean experiences hurricanes bringing heavy rains and destructive winds. The 2008 hurricane season was particularly severe, causing extensive damage of crops and trees, particularly in Haiti, together with several hundred deaths. Other natural disasters such as volcanic activity and earthquakes are less common in the Caribbean, but can affect the establishment of agroforestry systems in the region. This agroforestry system refers to production of agricultural crops with woody perennials on the same unit of land. The tree component can have either a productive or a service role, and the components can have a spatial (simultaneous) or temporal (sequential) arrangement. Agrosilvicultural systems include alley cropping (hedgerow intercropping), shade trees for plantation crops, multi-storey cropping, Taungya system, windbreaks, improved fallow, intercropping trees and crops, and a mixture of plantation crops. The systems most commonly practiced in the Caribbean are described below.This agroforestry system refers to the simultaneous production of agricultural crops (perennial species) and forest trees. In the Caribbean, cocoa and coffee are important plantation crops grown under shade trees because of their sensitivity to direct sunlight. Shade is provided by permanent trees which are planted at a spacing which allows between 25 percent shade (high altitudes) and 35 percent shade (low altitudes) for the cocoa and coffee plants. The planting density (trees/ha) of the shade trees will vary according to the species of trees used (i.e., its crown size when mature) and the percentage of shade required. Some of the common shade trees grown in cocoa plantations are immortelle, cedar, tonka bean, breadfruit and hog plum. The immortelle tree provides nitrogen (N), in addition to shade from the plant canopy. The root nodules, leaves, and flowers of the immortelle contain between four and six percent N, contributing to higher soil N levels and cocoa yields when compared to other shade trees. The major cocoa producing countries in the Caribbean are Trinidad and Tobago, Grenada, St Vincent, Haiti, and Jamaica.Alley cropping refers to an agroforestry intercropping practice in which fast-growing species of trees/shrubs are planted closely within the row ('hedgerows'), and wide between the rows ('alleys') to allow for planting of agricultural crops. Therefore, trees and crops are grown together in the same field at the same time (Nair et al. 1999). Leguminous, highvalue and/or short-duration crops are ideal for use in alley cropping. Depending on the tree species used (e.g., fruit trees) crops are not replanted when the trees mature and an orchard is established. When legume trees are used (e.g., Leucaena spp.), the hedgerows are cut back at the time the crop is planted. The hedgerows are also periodically pruned during the crop cycle to prevent shading and reduce competition for nutrients/water with the associated food crops. Root pruning is sometimes practiced during the early stages of hedgerow establishment. When there are no crops, the hedgerows are allowed to growAgroforestry Systems and Practices in the Caribbean unrestricted and cover the land. Alley cropping also enables cropping and fallow periods to occur simultaneously on the same unit of land. This means that the farmer can crop the land for a longer time before leaving it to fallow. Alley cropping is ideal for small-scale farmers but it is also adaptable to mechanized farming in larger holdings.Contour planting is one of the most common agroforestry systems practiced in the Caribbean. It involves the planting of trees along the contour line in moderately steep to steep slopes (Figure 11.2). Conservation buffers are strips or small areas of land in permanent vegetation. Filter strips, field borders, grassed waterways, contour grass strips, and riparian buffers are all examples of conservation buffers. They are used to protect ground/surface water quality and to reduce erosion (Figure 11.3) on cropland.Conservation buffers can also be used along streams and around lakes or wetlands. Buffers are most effective when they are included as part of a comprehensive conservation system. Some of the more common types found in the Caribbean are contour grass strips, filter strips, and grassed waterways, all of which function in a similar manner. Contour grass strips are narrow bands of perennial vegetation established across the slope of a crop field and alternated down the slope with strips of crops. Properly designed and maintained contour grass strips can reduce soil erosion and minimize transport of sediment pesticides, and other potential pollutants before they reach a body of water. These practices are used in many traditional Caribbean farming systems across hillsides to control runoff and soil erosion.The vegetation consists mainly of perennial grasses established parallel and perpendicular to the dominant slope of the field. However, combinations of trees, shrubs and grasses can be planted along the contour (Figure 11.4).These practices result in greater structural stability of the soil and can provide a higher yield and diversity of useful products. The contour grass strips are also known as horizontal vegetation strips/barriers. Grassed waterways are strips of grass seeded in areas of cropland where water concentrates or flows off a field. While they are primarily used to prevent gully erosion, waterways can be combined with filter strips to trap contaminants or field sediment.Riparian forest buffers, whether natural or man-made, have a dominant woody component, which sets them apart from vegetative filter strips that are used to intercept surface runoff in agricultural crop lands.Windbreaks are linear plantings of trees or shrubs (in single or multiple rows) which are planted on the border of crops. They are designed to improve crop production and assist in soil and water conservation. The Caribbean region can be subjected to strong prevailing NE Trade winds, and the establishment of windbreaks is important to crops which are sensitive to wind damage (e.g. cocoa and citrus). The tree species that are commonly used for windbreaks include nutmeg, clove, cinnamon, mango, neem, and pommerac. Some windbreaks can also provide an additional benefit of controlling pests and diseases to the economic crop, based on their ability to filter bacterial inoculum and deter the spread of viruses by aphids. Windbreaks established using Leucaena spp. is believed to prevent bacterial stem canker in papaya. Windbreaks are also favorable because they are unobtrusive to the various management practices for the cash crops grown. Windbreaks can help protect young crops, maintain soil fertility, reduce soil loss by wind erosion, and pruned vegetation and fallen leaves from the trees can act as mulch.The many benefits of windbreaks, makes it very applicable for extensive use in the Caribbean, especially in the Windward Islands. However sometimes hurricanes can cause destruction to both the windbreaks and the agricultural crops. When the wind speed is high, it can cause physical damage to crops (broken branches and uprooting) together with shedding of flower/fruits resulting in reduce crop yield. To minimize this risk to fruit and tree crops, windbreaks are established using various tree species.This is an agroforestry practice in which fast-growing trees/shrubs are planted after harvesting crops, so that when the land is next cleared for cultivation (i.e. after the fallow period) products are available for household use or marketing. The crops and trees therefore occupy the same piece of land at different periods in time (sequentially). The trees and shrubs may be left to occupy the site for several months or years. The tree species grown in natural fallows can produce high-value products such as fruits, medicine, or high-grade timber to provide economic benefits during the fallow period. Alternatively, leguminous trees and shrubs can be planted to improve soil fertility. The leaf litter from the trees also suppresses weeds, enrich the soil, conserve soil moisture, and after tree removal their roots decompose and release additional nutrients. This practice therefore has the potential to restore soil fertility more quickly than natural fallows, and to reduce fertilizer costs for subsequent crops.Traditionally, farmers left the croplands 'fallow' after a period of cultivation so that they can regain their fertility naturally. However, improved fallows accelerate the process of rejuvenation and thereby shorten the length of the natural fallow period. Even though improved fallow has its origins in 'slash-and-burn' agriculture, the practice can be applied to any agricultural land that is not under cultivation in order to rehabilitate and increaseAgroforestry Systems and Practices in the Caribbean the nutrient status of the soil. The effect of improved fallow depends on the length of the fallow period and the type of tree species. The recommended tree/shrubs should be fast-growing, nitrogen-fixing, and easy to propagate. Examples include various species of Leucaena, Sesbania, and Gliricidia. The benefits of improved fallow is that it allows for quick restoration of soil fertility (nutrient and organic matter content), nutrient recycling from deeper soil horizons, protecting the soil from erosion, reduces weed growth, and allows for production of fuelwood thus reducing the burden on the natural forests. Therefore, it has great potential for promoting food security through increased soil productivity.The Taungya system consists of growing annual agricultural crops along with the forestry species during the early years of establishment of the forestry plantation. This agroforestry system is usually used by Government Forestry Divisions to establish large acreages of forest trees, usually for the timber industry. The land belongs to the government or largescale estate owners, who allow the subsistence farmers to raise their crops. The farmers are required to tend the forestry seedlings and, in return, retain a part or all of the agricultural produce. This is beneficial both to the State and to the private farmer.The Taungya system was introduced in Trinidad in the early 1900's when the State began to establish commercial timber plantations using teak and later Caribbean pine (Figure 11.5). This system involved short-term contracts to farmers to plant food crops (bananas and plantain) on state lands chosen for teak and pine establishment. In the 1980s the method was used in Trinidad to establish about 9,000 ha of teak and 4,000 ha of Caribbean pine (Lackhan 1992).In the past and up to the present time, livestock farmers have planted shade trees in their pastures. These pastures were also bounded by trees, which were used as fencing. As farmers increasingly realised the value of trees, the feasibility of trees as the main crop became more apparent with the use of smaller livestock (sheep and goat) to control the grass beneath. Trees were formerly not planted as the main crop, but used more in a supplementary role. Today, this is different, as farmers in recognition of the value of trees, have made them the main crop on many estates, with other forms of agriculture revolving around the tree plantations.Food crop production takes place during the period between land clearing and the plantation establishment phase. The Taungya system can sometimes appear unattractive to farmers, as its main objective is wood production, not food. Taungya persists in areas with high population pressure and where there is adequate government support and incentives. The adoption of this system varies among the Caribbean countries, with Trinidad showing some success (Figure 11.6).In this agroforestry practice, trees are grown in combination with annual crops. It is a type of intercropping and is widely-used by small-scale farmers in the Caribbean. Farmers usually plant a variety of crops integrated with perennial fruit and spice trees. This diversity is especially important in prevent land degradation in the smaller islands, which are dominated by mountain slopes. Trees with narrow crowns and deep root systems are preferred; while the annual crops should require minimum or no-tillage and have a low light requirement. In Grenada, food crops such as yam, corn, pigeon peas, sorrel, dasheen and tannia are integrated with spice trees such as nutmeg, clove, and cinnamon. Grenada is the world's second largest producer of nutmeg and the sustenance of the spice industry is important in providing socioeconomic benefits and food security for the country's population. In Haïti, peasant farmers will traditionally leave the occasional forest trees such mahogany, guaiac wood (Guaiacum officinale) and Haitian catalpa (Catalpa longissima) in the areas that they cultivated crops.These include tree gardens (in Trinidad) whereby combination of several fruit and other useful trees are cultivated, sometimes with the inclusion of annual crops. In this practice the plant components are of differing stature so that several layers of canopy are formed (Figure 11.7).This is an agroforestry system where trees (shrubs), pastures and/or livestock are integrated on the same piece of land. The components can be arranged as a pure stand with fodder trees/shrubs (cut-and-carry fodder production) and/or mixed in different configurations (e.g. living fences of fodder trees). Silvopastures can be created by planting trees in existing pastures or by establishing pastures under existing trees. This system can be used on both range and forest lands for the production of forage and tree products. The system can also help with soil conservation by growing grasses and trees/shrubs on sloping ground. The silvopastoral system can produce high quality forage and timber, together with conservation of the environment.It is important to consider potential markets, soil type, climatic conditions, and species compatibility when selecting trees and forages for use in the silvopastoral system. The trees grown for timber should be marketable, fast growing, deep rooted, and drought tolerant (e.g. Caribbean pine and cypre). Ideally, the forage component should be a perennial which is suitable for livestock grazing, compatible with the site/soil, and productive under partial shade (e.g. guinea grass -Panicum maximum and signal grass -Brachiaria decumbens). Potential livestock choices include cattle, sheep, goats, ducks, turkeys, and chickens.Agroforestry Systems and Practices in the Caribbean Silvopastoral systems can be established on any land capable of supporting tree and forage growth at the same time. However, they require a relatively large land area to sustain timber and livestock production. The spacing and arrangement of the tree species is important for silvopasture success. Trees can be evenly distributed to optimize growing space and light for both trees and forage. If desired, they can be planted in rows or clusters to limit their shade and root effects, while providing open spaces for pasture production. Furthermore, an understanding of forage growth characteristics and the timing/duration of grazing is important in silvopasture management. Since the livestock and tree components can be arranged in many combinations, silvopasture is ideal for sites where mechanized farming or a structured system is difficult or not required. Examples of silvopastoral systems include:• Trees on pastures -traditionally used for providing shade to livestock• Fodder banks -planting of leguminous fodder trees around farmlands e.g.• Living fences -Fodder trees are planted on farm boundaries or pasture borders• Plantation crops with pastures and animals -Plantation trees such as coconut can be planted in a scattered manner on pasture land to provide light shading under which cattle and small ruminants can graze (Figure 11.8).This agroforestry system integrates trees, crops, and livestock (pastures). This allows for multiple outputs such as fodder, fuelwood, and food for human consumption. The system represents a combination of components in the same unit of land and in a spatial sequence. This system is practiced when the farmer wants to reap all the benefits that would be obtained from silvopasture and agrosilviculture systems. Agrosilvopastoral systems usually consist of overstory trees, understory crops and grazing animals. The trees on the land may be native (spontaneous) or planted; the crops may include cereals or forage crops; and the grazing animals may include sheep, goat or cattle. The main type of agrosilvopastoral system practiced in the Caribbean is homegardens. The word 'homegarden' has been used loosely to describe diverse practices, from growing vegetables behind houses to complex multi-storeyed systems. It usually refers to a land-use system on private lands surrounding individual houses with a definite fence, in which several tree species are cultivated together with annual and perennial crops; often with the inclusion of small livestock. The homegarden consist of a small acreage, and planted with various plants from herbaceous vegetable crops to medium size trees. There are many forms of such gardens varying in how intensively they are cultivated and their location with regard to the home. The home garden provides plant and animal food for home consumption, and is usually located close to dwellings for security and convenience. They are also characterized by low capital input and simple technology or equipment. Fish farming or aquaculture combined with the growing of crops and trees represents a unique agrosilvopastoral system. Aquaculture in agroforestry practices can involve rice cultivation with fish and trees, as well as fish ponds in farmland with trees (Figures 11.9 and 11.10).Agroforestry is practiced throughout the world, in order to address some form of national socio-economic development, such as, increased food production, natural resource conservation, environmental protection and poverty alleviation. In some countries, the primary motivating factor in the adoption of any agroforestry system is the economic gain. Agroforestry systems have been successfully established and maintained in countries such as India, China and Papua New Guinea. These countries have humid tropical environments that are similar to the Caribbean and a brief description of their success given below to highlight their applicability to the Caribbean region.In India, agroforestry systems have played an important role in programmes for controlling shifting cultivation. In West Bengal and Karala, the Taungya system was used successfully, thus creating forest villages, which provided labour for forestry operations (Singh 1987). The farmer generally leaves useful trees, such as mango, tamarind and jackfruit in the areas being cultivated to provide them with edible products. In suitable areas, along with rice and millet, crops such as coffee are planted under the shade of silver oak (Crevillea robusta) and other crops such as tobacco and tumeric are grown.In China, increased industrialization activities have resulted in increased demand for timber and energy, which has led to more pressure on the land. In order to reduce problems such as soil erosion, siltation, flooding and desertification, agroforestry polices and legislation was created. These policies were designed to enhance the farmer's ability to produce more food, to put land to multiple use, to reforest the bare lands and, to expand forested areas for conservation.In Papua New Guinea, a programme called the 'Atzera Range Conservation Programme'was developed to address the problem of excessive soil erosion and runoff which causes flood damage to roads, bridges and the sewage system of the city (Harris 1979). These problems were caused by the migrants coming to the city from rural areas that establish squatter settlements and felled many trees for fuel and house-building. Since the Atzera Range is an extensive steeply sloping hill system adjacent to Lae, the second largest urban centre, a corrective programme was developed and implemented, based on the use of agroforestry techniques and sound ecological planning.Agroforestry Systems and Practices in the CaribbeanIn the Caribbean region, agroforestry features prominently in traditional farming systems. These systems involve use of various tree species such as forest, fruit, fodder, cocoa and coffee. Food forests have been described as a good example of agroforestry, and occur in islands such as St Kitts, Montserrat and Jamaica, where dry ravines called guts (or ghants) are used for growing mangoes, breadfruit, ackee, avocado and other fruit trees (Lackhan 2000). The Taungya system has been utilised by several forestry departments within the region for establishing forest plantations. Livestock are also reared in association with tree crops and forests trees. The leaves and stems from Gliricidia are used for feeding sheep while Leucaena is used for dry season feeding of livestock in the region. Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) has been used to improve the traditional system of shifting cultivation in Belize, and has the benefit of improving soil nitrogen.Agroforestry involves the production of multiple outputs which provide subsistence/ income to farmers and minimizes the risk of total failure by the production system (Nair 1993). It also aims to create a balance between increased agricultural development and environment conservation, and provides many benefits such as improving soil fertility, soil conservation, stabilizing river banks, and providing various tree products (fuelwood, timber, fruits). Agroforestry can be a viable option for reducing land degradation and increasing agricultural productivity in the Caribbean. Agroforestry systems are important because they provide many socioeconomic and environmental benefits. Agroforestry is seen as a tool that can enhance food security and improve rural livelihoods, increase soil fertility, improve soil and water conservation, aid in carbon sequestration, and help in the restoration of degraded lands. Agroforestry systems also increases biodiversity, creates additional wildlife habitat and support farmers in rural communities (Nair 1993). They also provide additional farm products such as timber, pulpwood, firewood, posts, fruit, nuts, and fodder. Agroforestry represents a collection of multipurpose practices that are enduring and help achieve a sustainable agriculture. It is a concept based on the interface between agriculture and forestry and it is a land-use approach of great potential value. Forests provide a wide range of productive as well as protective functions, contribute to socio-economic development and represent an important cultural asset. In terms of their protective functions, forests are important for their favourable impact on soil and hydrological systems, maintaining clean water and reducing the risks and impacts of floods, erosion, and strong winds. Forests also play a key role role in carbon sequestration and mitigation of climate change. In the subsequent sections, three major categories of benefits, namely ecological/environmental, economic and sociological/psychological, will be described.Sustainable Food Production Practices in the Caribbean -Volume 2Soil fertility refers to the capacity of a soil to support plant growth on a sustained basis under given climatic conditions and land characteristics. Agroforestry systems can be critical in improving soil fertility. For example, leguminous trees planted as fallows can accumulate significant amounts of nitrogen in their leaves and roots, which is then made available to crops. Some of the species used to improve soil fertility also have nutritive value as fodder and can improve the quality of animal manures. Agricultural crops utilize nutrients from the surface layers of the soil while forest crops make use of the nutrients at the lower horizons. There is little need for chemicals as the presence of trees shade out weeds, thus reducing the need of chemical herbicides which destroy beneficial soil organisms. Fast growing trees e.g. Acacia and Leucaena aid in nitrogen fixation by absorption of nitrogen from the air thus making it available to other plants present.Continuous cropping of the soil (especially by monoculture) without adequate replacement of nutrients can lead to a decline in soil fertility. In the Caribbean region many soils lack adequate plant nutrients and organic matter. While artificial fertilizers can provide major nutrients (N, P, K), plant s require 16 essential nutrients for adequate growth and yield. The incorporation of woody perennials (deciduous) and multiple crop species (with various rooting depths) allows for the recycling of nutrients. Soil fertility can be improved or sustained from the decomposition of above and below ground plant biomass (such as fallen leaves, crop residues, and roots from harvested trees). When leguminous species are integrated in the agroforestry system, soil fertility also increases as legumes convert atmospheric nitrogen to the plant available form (nitrates).Agroforestry systems can improve soil and water conservation by reducing soil erosion caused by wind and water. They also reduce the transport of non-point source pollutants (e.g. chemicals and sediment) to water bodies (e.g. rivers and lakes), while retaining fertilizers and nutrients on the farmland. Agroforestry systems reduce surface runoff, improve water infiltration and stabilize the soil.Due to the humid tropical environment of the Caribbean, there can be periods of intense rainfall and flooding leading to soil erosion. Soil erosion removes the nutrient and organic matter rich topsoil, resulting in a decline in soil fertility. In agroforestry systems, woody perennial plants (with deep root systems) can be planted on steep slopes which are unsuitable for crop cultivation or grazing. When the woody perennials are established they provide a micro-environment conducive to the growth of other plant species. Trees and shrubs can | 371Agroforestry Systems and Practices in the Caribbean improve the infiltration of water in the soil thus reducing surface runoff. Trees also reduce wind speed and improve soil structure which helps to reduce soil erosion. Agroforestry is relevant to soil conservation since the initial cost of establishing erosion control is usually lower than engineering methods (Young 1987). In addition, crop yields can be maintained or increased due to control of soil loss. Agroforestry can also reduce the cost of reclamation for degraded lands by using trees which improve soil fertility. Examples of agroforestry practices that have the potential to control erosion include alley cropping and conservation buffers. Agroforestry systems are usually practice on slopes of 10°-40° using suitable soil conservation practices. They have also been an integral part of watershed management plans in several of the Caribbean countries, thus improving water quality and quantity.Trees also assist in soil and water conservation as soil structure is improved by the presence of tree roots, resulting in increased infiltration of water into the soil. Leaf litter produced by trees protects soil from the impact of rains, while tree roots help to hold the soil in place. Trees are soil builders and soil protectors, they can be used to rebuild poor soils, stabilize steep slopes and reduce soil erosion, thus enhancing agricultural production (Sanchez 1987). Agroforestry has potential for erosion control since the canopy and leaf litter cover the soil, the tree roots stabilize the soil and the trees also act as barriers to runoff. The use of contour strips in agroforestry systems is cost effective (with low initial establishment and annual maintenance costs compared to engineering methods).Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the earth's atmosphere are linked to global warming and climate change. CO 2 is the principal anthropogenic greenhouse gas with emissions arising from fossil fuel combustion, cement production, land use change and deforestation. The atmospheric CO 2 concentration has increased from 280 ppm in 1750 (onset of industrialization) to 315 ppm in 1958, and to 396 ppm in 2013, mainly due to the burning of fossil fuels. As global greenhouse emissions increase, they can affect human health, food security and contribute to environmental degradation. Forest lands are important to the carbon cycle since 610 Pg (1 Pg = 10 15 g) of carbon is stored in the global vegetation biomass (Lal 2004). Carbon sequestration refers to the uptake of atmospheric CO 2 during photosynthesis and the transfer of accumulated carbon into vegetation and soil pools for long-term storage. Plants also act as a sink for CO 2 ; therefore any decrease in forest area reduces the carbon stock of the forest ecosystem. During the past 25 years, agroforestry has been recognized as a sustainable, integrated land-use system with the potential of sequestering carbon. Nair et al. (2010) reported that the carbon sequestration potential varies due to ecology and management, and ranges from 0.3 to 15.2 Mg ha −1 year −1 aboveground, and 30-300 Mg C ha −1 up to 1-m depth in the soil (belowground biomass). Woody perennials (trees) represent the most important C pool in aboveground biomass. Therefore integrating more trees in the agricultural landscapes by adopting agroforestry can increase the potential for carbon sequestration and reduce the effects of climate change. Agroforestry systems can further contribute to the mitigation of climate change by providing a permanent soil cover, ensuring long term stability of carbon storage in fluctuating environments, and improving the efficiency of use of soil, water and climatic resources.Agroforestry systems can play an important role in climate change adaptation and mitigation in Caribbean countries. The increase biodiversity of agroforestry systems provide a safety net during periods of climate induced vulnerability and increases resilience to climate change. Adoption of agroforestry systems by Caribbean farmers can help ameliorate the effects of climate change by helping to stabilize erosion, improve soil and water quality, indirectly increase crop yields, increase biodiversity, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and increase carbon sequestration. Agroforestry is also an important component of sustainable land use and development.The inclusion of agricultural crops often results in increased tree production and less costs for tree management e.g. fertilization of agricultural crops in Taungya also benefits tree growth. Income can be generated for the farmer through the provision of by-products, which can be obtained from trees such as fruits and medicine. Composting of leaves, branches and twigs can provide a source of nutrients thus saving on the purchase of fertilizers. Agroforestry systems can provide economic benefits for the farmer both in the short-term (e.g. food) as well as the long-term (e.g. timber). Forages from leguminous trees such as Gliricidia and Leucaena can be a digestible source of protein-rich fodder as well as shade for livestock. It can also be used for supplementary feeding when grasses may be in shortage as in the dry season. The fodder trees and shrubs can be given to the livestock using a 'cut and carry' system or the animals may be allowed to graze the fields. A few countries in the Caribbean (e.g. Haiti) use firewood as the main source of energy. An increase in the number of trees planted and better management of existing resources can provide both fuelwood and other tree products. If fuelwood is limited, it can influence the amount and type of food cooked, thus affecting the family's nutrition. If wood production is increase for fuel use, other energy sources such as cow-dung and crop residues can be left in the fields. Fuelwood is mainly collected by women and the further the source of the fuel wood, the greater the workload. Agroforestry enables rural households to produce firewood which is easily accessible and close to the family farm.Agroforestry Systems and Practices in the CaribbeanAgroforestry practices can help in the prevention of environmental degradation and contribute to sustainable rural development, especially in regions where human-induced activities have resulted in a fragile ecosystem. Agroforestry can provide a source of employment and generate income for small-scale farmers in rural communities. Since agroforestry is an alternative land use system, it may be used as a tool by farmers practicing shifting cultivation as a means to provide them with better social service and improved living conditions. Tree products can be obtained throughout the year giving year round labour opportunities and regular income. In areas of shifting cultivation, a modernized agroforestry system can be implemented, where tree crops are rotated with a short period of agricultural production. This may be more acceptable than a shift to permanent annual crop production. Also, a sense of pride and fulfilment that one is contributing to the environmental and socio-economic welfare of the nation can contribute to an individual's esteem.A number of factors influence agroforestry development since systems can exist under a range of biophysical and socioeconomic conditions (Nair 1993). Factors that can influence the land owner's decision to adopt agroforestry or to select a particular system include:• Biophysical conditions such as climate, soil type, slope, and water availability.• The types of government policies and incentives for developing agroforestry systems.• The tenure of land, crops and trees, which determine if it is beneficial for farmers.• Technical support and extension services for the supply of inputs and for market delivery.• The needs, skills and education level of the land owner together with labor availability.This is necessary in order to protect and conserve the forest and wildlife resources in the region. It serves to safeguard against the exploitation of marketable species in the natural forests. There are no specific agroforestry policies, but agroforestry is covered under the forest policy and legislation in each country. The status of forest policy and legislation varies greatly between the CARICOM countries. All of the CARICOM countries implement some type of forest policy except Barbados, which has passed a number of Acts relating to tree conservation. Belize has a National Forest and Wildlife Policy which is over 50 years old but still relevant. Legislation in Belize includes the Forest Ordinance, Forest Fire Protection Ordinance, Private Forest (Conservation) Ordinance, National Park Systems Act and the Wildlife Protection Act. In Trinidad and Tobago, forest policy includes the Forest Act and the Conservation of Wildlife Act.Compared to monocropping, agroforestry can be a more economical option (due to lower expenditure on large machinery, equipment, and fertilizers) for small-scale farmers to support food production while preserving the environment. However, there are some factors which can affect the adoption of agroforestry by farmers such as access to information on agroforestry, training opportunities, good quality planting material, land tenure, and size of available land.Agroforestry have been practiced on a limited scale in the Caribbean islands of Antigua, Dominica, Jamaica, St Kitts and Nevis, and Trinidad and Tobago. The other Caribbean islands have very little experience in agroforestry. In Antigua, agroforestry has been developed into an intensive form of land use combining agricultural crops, shrubs and trees. In Dominica, multiple storey cropping systems have been established in large estates and consist of coconut, banana, citrus, coffee, and cocoa. In small farms, fruit trees, root crops and vegetables are more common. In Jamaica, agroforestry have been practiced for several decades, mainly using a multi-storey system. The top storey usually consists of cedar, breadfruit, mango and/or coconut, the middle layer has cocoa, coffee, bananas and/ or guava, and the ground layer contains peas, vegetables, sweet potato, yam or hot peppers. In Trinidad and Tobago, the Taungya system is used for the establishment plantations of teak and Caribbean pine. The next most common agroforestry practice is the establishment of an upper storey of cedar, mahogany or immortelle with a lower storey of cocoa, coffee and/or bananas.Agroforestry activities have not been well-documented or differentiated from forested lands in many of the Caribbean countries. Research and analysis of agroforestry systems have focused on the physical aspects of the systems but the economic contributions at the farm level have not been systematically assessed. The financial benefit of agroforestry systems are rarely the primary objective for promoting agroforestry or on-farm tree establishment. Therefore, farmers lack the motivation to establish agroforestry systems since it is viewed as a form of subsistence farming and not a generator of income and this may have contributed to project failures. Therefore, agroforestry systems must be advertisedAgroforestry Systems and Practices in the Caribbean as profitable by providing examples of crop production increases, commercialization of tree-derived products, and provision of financial incentives to farmers.There is also need for further research on the development of agroforestry systems specific to the Caribbean. This includes research in silviculture, natural forest management, hydrology, land use and wildlife management. Extension officers are usually trained in the field of agriculture and may not have the knowledge and experience to influence adoption of agroforestry systems by farmers. In terms of practical limitations, farmers may not be aware of tree-crop interactions in agroforestry systems which may influence the success of the operation. Therefore some key considerations when designing an agroforestry system include:• Increasing the overall value of the system,• Ensuring trees and crops are complementary• Decreasing or eliminating competition• Minimizing crop displacement, through appropriate tree management.There are many constraints in the Caribbean region which influence agroforestry and forestry in general. These include the limited size of the Caribbean islands, high and increasing population density, uncontrolled grazing and shifting cultivation, soil erosion and sedimentation, decreasing forest resources (which are not replaced), not utilizing lands to its productive potential, decline in fuel wood, and natural disasters (e.g. hurricanes and earthquakes). Preference for cultivation of plantation crops (e.g. bananas) because of market demand also represents a constraint to the implementation of agroforestry systems.In 1997, the Forestry Division of Trinidad and Tobago received funding for a communitybased forestry and agroforestry project under the Public Sector Investment Programme (PSIP). The project was implemented to assist in preventing and reversing the cycle of deforestation and land degradation on private lands, particularly landowners with large parcels of land, and who were willing to commit land and other resources to relatively longterm forestry and agroforestry projects. Community-based groups were also encouraged to participate in the programme. Specific objectives of the project included:• The promotion of sustainable land-use practices• The development of economically and ecologically viable forestry and agroforestry systems• The restoration of degraded private lands• The optimization of timber production on private lands• The generation of employment opportunities in rural/agricultural communities In 1999, a revised Agricultural Incentive Programme was introduced, in which for the first time, incentives for forestry operations were included. These incentives have increased the implementation of forestry-related activities on private lands, specifically agroforestry. Within this context the Forestry Division assisted in the following ways:• Providing technical assistance to farmers, community groups and other organizations• Processing incentives to assist farmers in establishing and maintaining plots• Monitoring and assessing projects• Conducting basic training in forestry and agroforestry practicesIn the region there is the need to modify existing legislation to reflect recently adopted policies aimed at protecting and promoting agroforestry systems. In order to promote agroforestry, there must be legislation to provide security of tenure for small-scale farmers, which can be achieved via policies which guarantee equal access to land resources. The establishment of a system which allows the separation of the ownership of land from the ownership of trees would open new possibilities for farmers without land. In order to be effective, agroforestry requires that the farmers are given clearly established rights to the land and to the trees they plant.The Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago has approved a new National Forest Policy and National Protected Areas Policy (2011), which provides the guidance for the development of appropriate legislative and administrative framework for the sustainable management of the forest resources of Trinidad and Tobago. The Policy recognizes that forests, forest resources and forest use contribute significantly to national development, livelihoods and human well-being, and seeks to encompass all the main dimensions of forest conservation, use and management, given that the functions of forests are varied and the relationships between forests and other sectors are complex.In developing countries, agroforestry can contribute towards alleviating poverty and advancing food security by increasing crop and livestock production through innovative technologies. In many Caribbean countries, introduction of agroforestry systems to rural communities can reduce hunger by increasing crop production through improved soil | 377Agroforestry Systems and Practices in the Caribbean fertility. The increase in population size and continued environmental degradation in the Caribbean region has resulted in reduced food production and the inability of countries to meet their food demands. The total population of the CARICOM countries (excluding Haiti) has increased from 5.9 million in 1990 to 6.85 million in 2010 (a 16 percent increase); and is projected to reach 10 million by 2050. Haiti conducted its two previous population census in 1980 and 2004; however, the population for 1990 and 2010 has been estimated at 7.1 million and 9.7 million, respectively, representing an increase of 37 percent (Table 11.3). Haiti's population is larger than all the other CARICOM countries combined and is the most affected by environmental degradation.Food security is defined as the physical and economic access to food for all people at all times. Agroforestry have tremendous potential in providing food for local consumption and reducing the food import bill. Agroforestry systems include growing a variety of useful trees, annual crops and livestock thereby preventing micronutrient malnutrition in regions were nutrient deficiency may occur from consumption of a single or few food source (dietary diversity or quality).An important aspect of agroforestry is crop diversification which allows for a wider range of food products to eat and sell, improved nutrition, and the ability to spread the risk in production due to varying weather conditions. The production in agroforestry systems can be complementary, where overall yields are greater for the system as a whole than if one species only was present. Also agroforestry systems can be synergistic, where total yields are greater than the sum of the individual components if grown separately (Nair 1993).Agroforestry systems allows for symbiotic economic and ecological interactions between components to maximize, sustain and diversify the total land output. They incorporate perennial trees which are useful for fuelwood, fruit and fodder, together with annual crops. Agroforestry systems can be established on soils of low fertility or degraded soils, as well as recuperating soil nutrients over a period of years. They can reduce farmer's risk to seasonal environmental variations and in the long-term maintain and increase soil quality. Agroforestry allows farmers to make the best use of their land, can boost field crop yields, and diversify income. Thus it can help in bringing previously unsuitable land into production, therefore increasing the food supply and provide food and nutrition security for the developing countries in the Caribbean. Agroforestry is only a new word for an old practice: it is based on forestry, agriculture, animal husbandry, land resource management, and other disciplines that all form the systematic background of land use. Furthermore, it encompasses an awareness of interactions between humans and the environment and between demand and available resources in a given area. Although science can improve agroforestry practices, an important aspect for the Caribbean region is to mobilize and implement what is already known. Agroforestry can significantly increase the production of forest and agricultural products (multiple outputs), while at the same time ensuring the land is used at its maximum potential. Agroforestry is therefore a sustainable approach to land-use management whereby agriculture and forestryAgroforestry Systems and Practices in the Caribbean are combined into an integrated production system resulting in maximum benefits to the land owner. It has great scope and potential in providing social, economic and environmental services to improve the lives of the people in the Caribbean region.Aquaculture is the fastest growing animal food-producing sector, with the per capita supply increasing from 0.7 kg in 1970 to 7.8 kg in 2008; an average annual growth rate of 6.6 percent (Murray 2014). Aquaculture is set to overtake capture fisheries as a source of food fish globally. Between 2006 and 2008, aquaculture consumption increased from 42.6 percent to 45.7 percent worldwide. In the Latin American and the Caribbean (LAC) region, Chile, Brazil and Ecuador have been the leaders in aquaculture production with a production rise from 0.1 percent to 9.6 percent in 30 years.The aquaculture sector is not well developed in the CARICOM region. The main reason is that most CARICOM states have limited land and fresh water resources. In the mid-1990s, the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) members of CARICOM recommended that land-based aquaculture should not be the focus of their fisheries development thrust, but instead should be a subsistence activity for small farmers. Some CARICOM states, such as Suriname, Guyana and Belize, however, have ample supplies of land and fresh water which can support aquaculture. In contrast, most island states in the Caribbean have large expanses of marine space, which have the potential for development of the marine-based aquaculture or 'mariculture'. Because of the limited potential growth of wild catches in the Caribbean region, sustainable expansion and intensification of fish production through responsible aquaculture development should be a major objective for intensification of fish production. The CARICOM approach to aquaculture development will have to be multifaceted to address the range A Method for Growing Tilapia in Atlantic Seawater in St Kitts: A Sustainable Alternative to Traditional Coastal Fishery SystemsA Method for Growing Tilapia in Atlantic Seawater in St Kitts of available natural land and fresh water resources in the region, while incorporating the commercial elements. St Kitts and Nevis, however, has concluded that an aquaculture sector will create investment opportunities, and could, in its most developed version, create many job opportunities for highly skilled people both at the production and management levels.The CRFM identified aquaculture as a priority since 2002 and an aquaculture development policy formulation was identified as one of the areas to be addressed under the CRFM/ JICA Master Plan Study (2009Study ( -2011)). Recognizing the need to put in place a mechanism to promote and provide support for the development of aquaculture in the region, the CRFM Secretariat, in 2012 established a Working Group to Promote Sustainable Aquaculture Development (WGA) at the national and regional levels, mainly for the purposes of: increasing food production and security; improving rural income and employment; diversifying farm production; and increasing foreign exchange earnings and savings, as well as, advising the Caribbean Fisheries Forum on policies, programmes and projects to promote the development of aquaculture. It is however important that the WGA considers the major challenges for aquaculture development in the Caribbean, which include: availability of freshwater; technology transfer; feed access and availability; innovative technical assistance for small-scale farmers; governance and political willingness; and application of the Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture.Globally, tilapia is the third most important fish in aquaculture after carp and salmon; worldwide production exceeded 1,500,000 metric tons in 2002 and increased annually. Because of their high protein content, large size, rapid growth (six to seven months to grow to harvest size), and palatability, a number of tilapiine cichlids-specifically, various species of Oreochromis, Sarotherodon and Tilapia-are the focus of major aquaculture efforts. The species raised in fish farms include salmon, trout, cod, carp, catfish, sea bass, tilapia and others. Today, the vast majority of Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout are farmed intensively in fish farms.The Nile tilapia has distinctive, regular, vertical stripes extending as far down the body as the bottom edge of the caudal fin, with variable coloration. Adults reach up to 60 cm (24 in) in length and up to 4.3 kg (9.5 lb) and lives for up to nine years. It tolerates brackish water and survives in temperatures between eight and 42°C (46 and 108 °F). It is an omnivore, feeding on plankton, as well as, on higher plants. Introduced tilapia can easily become an invasive species (see Tilapia as exotic species). It is a species of high economic value and is widely introduced outside its natural range, (which is similar to the Mozambique tilapia (O. mossambicus), and is the most commonly cultured cichlid (Cook 2007). Recent studies in Kenya showed that this fish feeds on mosquito larvae, making it a possible tool in the fight against malaria in Africa.Small islands with no significant rivers, streams, brooks or suitable freshwater ponds and clay have always had to forgo assistance to develop aquaculture. With the rapid depletion of reef fishes in the Caribbean, St Kitts imports fish for the local tourism industry as well as for local consumption.In the Federation of St Kitts and Nevis (SKN), solutions are being sought and developed through the St Kitts and Nevis Aquaculture Pilot Project & Environmental Research (SNAPPER). This project was conceptualized as a research, development and training entity in 1999 and commenced Research and Development (R&D) in 2006 in response to the reality that marine capture of fish was on the decline, while aquaculture yields and sales were increasing at a phenomenal rate. In addition, the real possibilities of employment creation, food security and economic viability, presented a lucrative development opportunity.The absence of suitable clay deposits required for pond lining further complicated aquaculture development initiatives in St Kitts, which is one of the smallest islands in the Caribbean, with no running rivers or pond sealing clay. In addition, the public water supply is expensive and relies heavily on available aquifers for good fresh water sources. The island is surrounded by the Caribbean Sea on one side and the Atlantic on the other. The first challenge to start the project of tilapia production in the Atlantic sea water was to find a suitable site for establishing the research ponds. Because official endorsement was not given, and international experts advised against this aquaculture project, land access was as a problem. Eventually, private sector benevolence provided a peppercorn lease for ⅛ of an acre of land bordering the Atlantic and the project was initiated.This project began in 1999 after it was discovered that a fisherman in Jamaica caught a tilapia in his seine net. Further investigations were carried out at the fisheries complex at Twickenham farm in Jamaica, where experimental brood ponds were in operation. The information received provided a departure towards a non-traditional approach and technique for farming tilapia. The site on the Atlantic coast was more appropriate because waste water from city buildings and dwellings along the several ghauts running through Basseterre made their exit in the Caribbean Sea. Other private sector donors have since provided additional lands and the Government of Australia has contributed substantial project development funds. Locally, duty-free concessions on an item-by-item basis have been also granted to the project. The project currently farms freshwater tilapia in 100 percent Atlantic seawater.A Method for Growing Tilapia in Atlantic Seawater in St KittsAny attempt to successfully develop an aquaculture industry must ensure that consideration is given to policy, funding, land availability, water quality and suitable feed. Some of these issues are now discussed.The introduction of Aquaculture as an industry or sector must be developed within the context of a national policy. Without a sound policy, allied government departments will not acknowledge their required input, or commitment. Unfortunately, the practice of divorcing aquaculture from agriculture is a not a well-informed practice, certainly not an industry best practice. This situation can be corrected by any Ministry of Agriculture through its programme development department, or as a planned and funded aspect of a Department of Marine Resources.In the aquaculture project in St Kitts, the principal operational challenges included water quality and availability. The seawater environment necessitated the use of corrosion resistant water pumps. However, the turbulence in the ocean at times resulted in PVC pipe abrasion, due to incessant wave action and pipe contact with reefs. Other minor problems included draft tides and excessive seaweed flow at the intake point. The Atlantic is never calm, and the threat of a devastating hurricane has been heavily factored in the design of the fish ponds. They are 5' above ground, with a protective canal on the periphery as a flood/ sea defense. This canal also serves as a capture facility for total pond harvesting.Praedial larceny also presents a challenge both at the fingerling and adult stages. There is need to strengthen the relevant laws and ensure their enforcement. To a lesser degree, there is also competition from birds. Many creative solutions have been attempted, but the most effective deterrent has been the introduction of large eyes and scarecrows, strategically located around the periphery of the fish ponds.Adequate funding for the project was a major challenge as the banks were skeptical when told of the plan to grow freshwater fish in seawater. This would not be quite as difficult if fresh water aquaculture was proposed. Funding agencies also preferred to work with cooperatives or associations. Traditionally, research and development activity depend to a large extent on grant funding. Unfortunately, due to the global economic dilemma, such funding sources have suffered drastic contraction. It is hoped that the successes of SNAPPER will encourage government's participation towards establishing a national aquaculture sector.The present invention relates to the employment of new techniques in the acclimatization of the freshwater fish (tilapia). Through a structural configuration and manipulation, the processes enabled 15-day tilapia fry to be transferred to full strength seawater, resulting in their ability to drastically reduce chances of mortality. The invention is based, not only on concepts developed previously, but also on researcher observations.Based on the fact that seawater was the only water in abundance, primary assumptions were made and subsequent assumptions evaluated. These evaluations and successes resulted in a more resolute approach to experimentation.The initial evaluations entailed experimenting with species of tilapia (namely O. mossambicus & O. niloticus). The inventor was able to test the efficacy of assumptions on two selected species cross between O. mossambicus and O. niloticus, on a research farm in Conaree, St Kitts, West Indies.Salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen and the maintenance of a pH of between 6.5 and 7.5 were continuously monitored. Acclimatization was the most problematic hurdle as challenges in the research to determine a suitable stage of commencement, and all the other factors that had to be solved. At seven years into the project cycle, acceptable success began to emerge. In year nine, a reliable and proven acclimatization process was perfected. This is now known as 'trickle acclimatization'.The Jamaica red snapper was the fingerling of choice. This invention involves the acclimatization of a cross between O. mossambicus and O. niloticus, for use on islands where suitable freshwater resources are limited.The main objectives of the project were to:• develop an appropriate technological procedure for small island states aquaculture development, where natural freshwater supply is limited or non-existent;• establish the shortest time frame for acclimatization;• minimize the mortality rate in the conversion process and• encourage reproduction and satisfactory growth in seawater.| 385A Method for Growing Tilapia in Atlantic Seawater in St KittsThe following is the approach to implementation that was used in St Kitts:• Lining up the ponds in the traditional wind flow in order to reduce energy consumption for aeration purposes.• Ensuring that ponds were above ground level, in order to counter hurricane flooding. Five ponds 100' x 25' x 4' were lined with the thick non-leaching polyurethane plastic (geo membrane). The lining was laid seamless by tucking the corners up and tacking the material when the sun was hot, on a frame, then backfilling to the required height.• Piping was the next challenge. Initially the Atlantic feed was difficult to stabilize, but a 4' cast iron sleeve with a 2\"schedule 40-PVC pipe threaded into it proved to be successful. A foot valve and strainer were attached to the end, which was cleaned regularly, due to seaweed and sand. At 150' from foot valve to draft pump, priming was problematic, but solutions were found. One and a half miles of pipe were laid for freshwater, saltwater, groundwater, and included a 4\" manifold reduced to 2\" and then to ½\" for aeration distribution.In the third year of the project, saltwater research began. Expertise from universities in Taiwan, Norway and the SKN local fisheries department advised that the level of tolerance to be expected should be 50/50 or at most 60/40, the greater being seawater.There were massive fish kills on numerous occasions, due to excessive algal growth (green water culture constituted the first experiment), heat during June-August, and excessive salinity. Each of these problems had to be solved as they occurred. Water quality, pH levels, temperature and other measurements were also monitored and addressed. The salinity increased which resulted in 'corned fish' due to topping up the ponds with Atlantic sea water. The continuous evaporation by wind and sun removed the fresh water, resulting in increased salt levels. The heat problem was easy to solve. Partial shade using shade cloth reduced high temperatures and a continuous flow of water, (the flow-through system) addressed salinity, pH, aeration and temperature. A return path through the sand under the ponds and back to ground water, addressed the environmental problem. Contamination of the reef and reef life was also avoided. As a plan 'B', a powerful Rotron Regenorative blower which powers eight air stone ponds is used on windless days.Acclimatization was the biggest research problem; to determine commencement acclimatization stage, and all the other associated factors that had to be solved. It is now ten years into the project cycle with acceptable success, except for petty larceny of fish and visits from fishing birds. The bird problem has been solved with dogs on pond long length Alexandre, Gisele (Ph.D.)Dr. Gisele Alexandre is a research engineer in animal husbandry and tropical farming systems. She studies creole small ruminants using different scales (animal, product, farming system, food chain). Diverse disciplines are integrated in her approach: reproduction control, pasture management, feeding strategies and meat quality. She analyzes the diversity, the productivity and the territorial and societal functions of livestock. G. Alexandre has performed many missions of education (academic and vocational training) and often interacts with stakeholders in the French Antilles (breeder's unions or Natural Parks) but also elsewhere in the Caribbean (Cuba, Haiti, Mexico). As a member of the International Goat Association, and having lead numerous expert missions in the Caribbean and Latin America, she brings a critical glance at the strengths and the constraints in tropical areas. More specifically, she investigates the multi-functional features of livestock farming in these territories. She is taking part of a team project upon agroecological engineering adapted to tropical agro ecosystems. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3162209594.json b/main/part_2/3162209594.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d2bed5b95d6f9312234e0ed8208e5fa4fe13bef --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3162209594.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"35ba8d399722a5cdcc71a8ac30f06a42","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H018302.pdf","id":"170945654"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"88973bc3-f10a-4dbd-9adf-0d27b8513f6e","content":"List of the total number of outlets of Malik Sub-Div.Allah is He who created the heavens and the earth and sent down water from the clouds, then brought forth with it fruits as a sustenance for you, and He has made the ships sub servient to you to run their course in the sea by His command, and up keeping of system to cope with the battle of hunger and poverty on scientific grounds has not been given due importance and very many efforts have been made so for to improve the existing system. Due to this negligence and unrealistic approach, 70 to 80 per cent population of Pakistan depending upon canal irrigation are facing problems for their survival.Keeping in view the difficulties experienced by the Punjab Irrigation & Power Department (in various fields of irrigation), for the improvement of the existing system by using new and modern techniques and methodologies, IIMI (\\nternationallrrigation Management Institute) has been asked for collaboration in various research activities. For this purpose, in Fordwah/Eastern Sadiqia area in Bahawalnagar circle (Irrigation unit in Punjab) IIMI has been involved in research activities for the last three years, and some results are now being tested in the field, to demonstrate the possibility of a productive collaboration work between researchers and managers. The main objective of IIMI's research in this area is to develop and pilot test in collaboration with national research and line agencies alternative irrigation management practices to optimize agricultural production and mitigate problems of salinity/sodicity. The research is found very helpful in aims to develop tools to assist irrigation managers to take better founded decisions on operations and maintenance. So on the special recommendation of worthy Chief Engineer Bahawalpur, the then Superintending Engineer Bahawalnagar, research on perennial system i.e. Malik Sub-Division canals started and is now under progress. Before discussion on the existing conditions of canals in Malik sub-division and on going activities, we will first discuss some history of irrigation at a glance.The art of applying water to the land dates back to the beginning of human civilization. The oldest canal still in use was begun about 1900 b.c. in Egypt, by the Prophet Joseph when he was Grand Vizier to the Pharaoh. This canal is situated in Medinet-I-Faiyum, 80 miles south of Cairo and irrigates the lush green fruit gardens of that area. It leads off the Nile, is about 200 miles long, and is called Joseph's canal by the fellahin. The Holy Quran also throws some light on the great canal system , inherited by Ramses-ii (1304-1237 b.c.'. It is thought that the floating basket carrying the infant Moses may have reached the gardens of the Pharaoh's palace by way of a canal leading off the Nile. Egypt claims to have the world's oldest dam, 355 ft long and 40 ft high, built some 5000 year ago to store water for drinking and irrigation. It was built by king Menes (C.3100 b.c) across the Nile near Menesphis.The Holy Quran mentions the destruction of the flourishing community of Sabah in Yemen in the following verse: \"but they turned away, wherefore We sent upon them the inundation of the dam and We exchanged their two gardens for two gardens bearing bitter fruit and tamarisk and some lote-trees\". The dam mentioned in the above is known as Sadde Marib (Marib dam) and was built 3 miles from the capital city of Marib, 60 miles east of Sanah in 800 b.c. (lqbal Ali, 1975) The indo-gangetic plain also boasts an ancient irrigation system. Archaeological excavations at Harappa, Moenjodaro and Kot Dijji have revealed the existence of an . advanced civilization based on some form of irrigation system. In the recorded history of the sub continent, the practice of the irrigation can be traced back to the 8th century when the Muslim invaders differentiated between irrigated and non irrigated lands for the purpose of levying land tax.The present elaborate system of the western Jamna canal is believed to have been based on a system initiated by Feroz Shah Tuglaq. Ali Mardan Khan, an Engineer and Governor of Punjab during Shah Jahan's rule, constructed the Hasli Canal leading off the Ravi which forms the nucleus of the present upper Bari Doab canal, (Iqbal Ali, 1975).Pakistan's irrigation system has a great importance over the world globe and was extended enormously over the last hundred years. In the middle of the 19th century when the British took over the control of the sub continent, there were only a few inundation canals in the area now comprising Pakistan, irrigating some 200,000 acres. By the end of 19th century a number of separate inundation system had been developed for each river. The total irrigated area increased to 3.6 million acres, with a total canal mileage of 4340 miles. At the end of the 19th century efforts were also made to construct a weir control irrigation system. The inundation systems were merged with the various perennial irrigation schemes when these were completed and both are now being fed from the storage dams at Warsak on the river Kabul and Mangla on the river Jehlum as well as from the 17 barrages and headworks. Pakistan perennial irrigation system is the world's third largest, irrigating some 33 million acres with a total canal mileage of 40,000 mile and a discharge of 2,30,000 cusecs. In addition a vast system of link canals was constructed in the 1960's for transferring the water of the western rivers to the canal system which used to be fed by the eastern rivers, Beas, Sutlej and Ravi (Iqbal Ali, 1975). As our study relates to Malik Branch system, so we will focus on the history of that part of the system.Bahawalpur state was bounded on the north and west first by the combined Sutlej and Beas Rivers, then by Chenab River :md finally by the Indus. The length from the north-east to south-west was about 300 miles and its mean width was about 66 miles. The total area was about 20,000 square miles of which two thirds was under desert, and the rest was cultivated. The State abuts on the rivers, 170 miles border along Sutlej, 50 miles border along Chenab and 80 miles border along Indus. The climate was dry and hot for the greater part of the year. Rain was scarce. We\\\\ water was sweet in riverain tracts but brackish in the old \"Cholistan\" and now new colony areas. The main industry was agriculture. Prior to its connection with the British Power in India in 1833, Bahawalpur state was an independent sovereign State pawning allegiance to no supreme power. In 1833 the state entered into a treaty with the British Government in India whereby a Political Agent of the British Government was posted in Bahawalpur, the State remained completely independent in all internal matters and enjoyed full sovereign rights. The rivers passing through Bahawalpur territory were considered to be the property of the state and the Ruler levied tolls on merchandise transported on the Indus river. The British Government did not interfere in this right of the State. From the irrigation point of view, the State could be divided into three tracts each running parallel to the other. In connection with the canal irrigation in the state Mr.Barns says: \"Irrigation must have always been in vogue and, equally with Sindh and the Punjab, the canals received more or less care as the ruler for the time being was energetic or otherwise. My opinion is that in a period less than 50 years ago the irrigation of this state was in a far more prosperous condition than when Major Minchin took over the charge of State; the number of canals large and small (omitting all under 10 feet breadth) then in existence was as follows: viz., 26 from the Sutlej, 6 from the Chenab and 6 from the Indus. \" (Page 243 of the Punjab State Gazette, Volume XXXVI A Bahawalpur state 1904). The inundation canals to which Mr.Barns refers were constructed at different times. It will be interesting to note the dates of construction of a few of them with area irrigated, see Annexure-A.This project provided for the construction of 3 weirs on the river Sutlej, below its junction with the river Beas; and a fourth weir on the Panjnad reach of the Chenab below its junction with the Sutlej. Three perennial and five non-perennial canals, and two \"combination\" canal (perennial and non-perennial) with an approximate aggregate Kharif capacity of 48516 cusecs had been proposed to take off from the rivers at these weirs for the benefit of Punjab, Bahawalpur and Bikaner territory. This project was designed for the annual irrigation of 3.5 million acres over and above the 1.5 million acres already supplied by inundation irrigation, which latter area was also to benefit by the more reliable supplies resulting from the construction of weirs. It rendered available for colonization nearly a million acres of crown waste land in British territory and a further 2.5 million acres in Bahawalpur and Bikaner States. The cost of the entire project was estimated at nearly 24 crores rupees and the financial return therefrom on the British portion at 15 per cent, taking estimated credit for the sale of crown waste land. This project received the sanction of the Secretary of State for India in November, 1921. Before the construction of the weir-controlled irrigation system, the following inundation canals were present in the Sutlej Valley Project are: a) Lower Sutlej inundation canal system b) Hajiwah canal c) Upper Sutlej inundation canal system d) Grey canal of Ferozepore district e) Bahawalpur state inundation canal History of (a-d) is available but left untouched due to the focus of this report and can be provided on request.The Sutlej valley project provided for four weir on Sutlej, at Ferozepore, Sulemanki, Islam and on the Panjnad reach of the Chenab. Canals were constructed for supplying water both (perennially and non perennially) to tracks in the Punjab province and in Bikaner and Bahawalpur state, under a tripartite agreement by which the water available at those weirs was to distributed to the various canals. The Panjnad weir which was constructed below the confluence of the Sutlej and the Chenab allowed the Bahawalpur state to participate in supply in the Chenab as well as in the surplus water of the Sutlej for their canals taking off at the Punjnud weir (Pir Muhammad Ibrahim 1948). The detail information of all the canals taking off from the various weirs has been provided in Annexure-A.On the Sulemanki headworks, which lies in the west Punjab, two canals were proposed on the left bank, Fordwah canal and Sadiqia canal. Fordwah canal lying in Bahawalpur state was proposed for irrigation in state territory and replaced the Fordwah inundation canal. It was designed with a head maximum capacity of 3366 cusecs and a share capacity of 2244 cusecs to irrigate a gross area of 450934 acres and a culturable area of 434731 acres. The Sadiqia canal also lying in Bahawalpur state offtaking from left bank of Sulemanki weir is a perennial canal irrigating Bahawalpur state designed with a head capacity of 4917 cusecs to command a gross area of 1078640 acres of which Kot Sher Muhammad Section includes Malik Branch Rd 1000 to 95900, Gajjiani Disty (Rd 0 to 53200), Mahmooda, Bhukan, Dhaban and Thakt Mahal minors (head to tail). Data at head Malik and Gajjiani is collected 3 hourly and conveyed to Bahawalnagar twice a day where as data at head and tail of other channels are collected and conveyed daily under personal supervision of Sub Engineer incharge whose sanctioned headquarters are at Kot Sher Muhammad rest house. Signaller is also stationed at the same point.Gajjiani section includes Gajjiani Disty (Rd 53200 to tail), Chak Abdullah, Kokni, Chatala, Chishtian Minors and Madrissa Sub Minor (head to tail). Data at head and tail are collected and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily under personal supervision of Sub Engineer incharge with sanctioned headquarters at Gajjiani Rest house. Signaller headquarters is also at Gajjiani Rest house but data is conveyed through Chak Abdullah telegraphic station due to non working of Gajjiani Channina link.Sirajwah section consists of Sirajwah Disty (Rd 1000. to 67700).Bahadurwah, 1/R Bahadurwah and Najibwah Minors head to tail. Data at head Sirajwah is collected 3 hourly and conveyed to Bahawalnagar twice a day where as data at head and tail of other channels are collected and conveyed once a day to Bahawalnagar under personal supervision of the Sub Engineer with sanctioned headquarters at Donga Bonga Rest house. The Signaller also stationed at Donga Bonga.Total 1735 cusecs (1538 Malik, 197 Sirajwah) of authorized discharge is being delivered through four major, two minor and almost 50 direct outlets to Malik and Dahranwala Sub-Divisions. The Malik Sub-Division is headed by the Sub Divisional Officer stationed at Bahawalnagar. The three Sub Engineers and three Zilladars help the SDO in technical and revenue matters. Administrative set up of the sub division is given in Annexure-C.As explained above Malik sub division has three sections: 1) Sirajwah 2) Kot Sher Muhammad and 3) Gajjiani sections. Communicational and sectional set up of the sub division is presented in Annexure-D.Malik Branch is the second largest offtake of Eastern Sadiqia Canal. It replaced a vast track of land in Bahawalnagar and Bahawalpur Districts being irrigated by inundation canals in the past. The command area is fertile, but some patches are badly water logged and salinity affected. Over all efficiency is good. The channel has a vital and tremendous role in increasing the agriculture, economic and social values of the area. The land holdings are small, but some larger farms are also present in the command. Most of the channel length is in filling and high seepage can be observed.Malik Branch was designed perennially for 1538 cusecs and offtakes from tail Eastern Sadiqia canal at RD 245000/R. The total length of the branch is 23.38 canal miles, out of which 4.2 mile falls in Dahranwala and 19.18 mile falls in Malik Sub division. Channel has 90 ft bed width and 6.5 ft full supply depth in the head reach and 75 ft bed width and 5.90 ft full supply depth in the tail reach. The water surface slope varies from 0.11 to 0.12 per 1000 ft in total run. The value of lacey's silt factor had been adopted as 0.80 with free board 2.5 ft. The discharge at the tail is 1042 cusecs. There are hydraulic control points combined with fall and bridges at Rd's 22900, 38900 and 95900 to maintain the water levels as per command requirements. Hydraulic structures at head and Rd 38900 are provided with mechanical gates to control regulation. The structures at RD 22900 and 95900 have not been provided with gates. A cross regulator has also been provided at Rd 86000 to feed lift outlets in low supply periods. Detail of the total GCA/CCA, three year irrigation figures and major crops are provided in Annexure-F.Malik Branch has excellent working head while offtaking from parent channel. Gated structure with free orifice flow conditions are available at head. The discharge table is present but requires rechecking. The discharge at the head is most of the time higher than the design discharge, leading to scouring of bed and erosion of sides in most of the reaches. Some lift irrigation outlets also exist. Total supply is distributed among the irrigators through one major, two minor secondary canals and 45 direct outlets in Malik sub division. Most of the direct outlets are pipes, but some OCOFRB and OCAPM outlets also present. The left bank is 25 ft wide with a service road and the right bank is 15 ft wide. They are in good condition except some points where cattle cross regularly. Some reaches are without berm and free board resulting in a loss of capacity of reaches, giving a smaller security margin for operations. However over all outer and inner prism is in good shape and has a potential to sustain the thrust of excess except reaches between RD 23 to 37, RD 39 to 57 where the smallest margin of operation exists, as the right bank is in a bad shape. An abrupt drop in the elevation at RD 49 to 51 implies a risk of overtopping due to which the gauge reader at RD 38900 is very limited in his operations. The head regulators of Mahmooda and Bhukan disties are without gated structures, and normally, draw excess in full supply days which is why these distributaries have a better performance than bigger distributaries. The discharge tables at these points are missing, so it is very difficult to control excess supply and save valuable supply. This fact is very much clear from the irrigation figures of both the channels (see Annexure-F). Fall and bridge RD 22900 without gates works modular. Due to non-availability at Mahmooda & Bhukan distributaries and inconsistent gate movement of Gajjiani discharge variation in Malik Branch RD 38900 can be seen (see Graph-V).The cross-structure at Rd 38900, where Gajjiani Disty offtakes, is an important regulation point with gated structure. Supply/indent of Dharanwala sub-division is also met at this point. Discharge table is available but requires rechecking. Head and cross structures at this point are hydraulically weak. Even the right side pitching of Malik Branch in a length of almost 70 ft slipped down in previous closure 1994/95 and Department had to face a difficult situation. This work was repaired/completed on an emergency basis. Left side pitching also requires attention. At this point heavy fluctuation is the major operational problem and feeding of secondary canals (Fateh Murad) taking off from tail has become a burning issue. This situation is alarming and has an adverse effect on the efficiency of the system. See Annexure-I & F.The official rotational schedule is strictly followed and implemented as it is approved by SE. However the targets or objectives of water distribution are not clear, as per modern techniques and requirements of crops, leading to problems in the fair distribution of water when demand is in full swing. For detail of last year and existing supply conditions see Annexure-F. A lot of responsibility is left to the gauge readers, especially in slack demand days. Some secondary canals are even fed when there is no demand and a valuable supply can be saved for use in other areas. In routine management, they perform a good local control. But this local control can not tackle the 'fluctuations that enter the system, as they are amplified by operations inside the Sub Division. This leads to a highly variable discharge in the Branch and ultimately transfer into secondary canals, resulting in bad situations at tails. Sometimes breaches occur, partly because of these reasons. As a result, the canal is almost never in steady state.At RD 86000, there were two high level offtaking channels Le. Khober and chandana. These were closed around 1975 and supplies delivered to the irrigators by direct outlets. Provision of cross regulator for feeding in low supply or other suitable suggestion instead of giving direct outlets by closing distribution canals in 1975, is a separate issue, which will be dealt with in a later stage of Malik Branch studies and adverse or favourable results will be discussed. Now for feeding of high level outlets, a cross-regulator has been constructed in 1991/92 at the same point.The cross-structure at RD 95900 works modular with sufficient working head. The indent of Daharanwala sub division is met at RD 38900 instead of this point. There is no discharge table available. To improve the working efficiency of canals in lower reach, indent must be fed at RD 95900 and proper data collection facilities must be provided there. In channel command, no proper drainage system exists. In most of the reach, N.S.L (Natural Surface level) is lower than the channel bed and high filling adds to intensive waterlogging due to a high seepage rate. Cutting reach is only in between RD 63 to 70.The process of data collection (explained under sectional distribution set up given in Annexure-D) and its analysis has not been optimized, and the evaluation process is almost not performed at all. With a precise study of data collection and analysis, adequate knowledge of modern techniques in operation, improvements in links between gauge readers, the performance of the system can be stabilized with a high efficiency rate, tempering the coming fluctuations in the system with present security margin.Mahmooda Disty is the first secondary canal of Malik Branch. It is a high level channel whose command area is intensively affected by waterlogging and salinity in the tail reach. Some well organized farms are included in the command with lush green orcards.Mahmooda Disty was designed as a perennial unit of Malik Branch for distribution of 15.5 cusecs of discharge. It offtakes from RD 15464/R of Malik Branch and has a total length of 2.68 canal miles. There is no mechanical gate provided at head which works modular. A discharge table is missing. The details of total GCA/CCA, total number of outlets. major crops and last three year irrigation figures are provided in Annexure-F. The channel was designed with 10.8 ft W.S.W. in head reach and 1/3333 bed slope. No control point available to maintain the water level in this channel.In full supply days of Malik Branch. this channel runs a discharge more than authorized, which has adverse effect on the fertile command. Valuable agricultural land is being wasted every year. Unfortunately. due to paucity of funds in the past. no re-sectioning work has been carried out since long. Heavy growth of Jungle/Sarkanda with silt dunes can be observed along the channel on right side. Banks are weak with no berm and free board. leading to lesser security margin in operations. The channel potential capacity can not be used. and implies a risk of overtopping. Topography is such that the left side area is comparatively high as compared to the right side.The official rotational schedule is followed strictly as it is approved, that is why channel has abnormal shortage at tails in low supply periods of parent branch. As data collection and analysis are not optimized, and the evaluation process is almost ignored, that is why it has a poor performance than the other offtakes. It is also difficult to meet the targets or objectives of equitable and fair distribution during the whole season and reducing the shortage. Situation in low supply periods of muddy water has reduced the capacity and risk of overtopping has increased. Hydraulic data is collected and conveyed through telegraphic station at Kot Sher Muhammad daily. Tail front works modular where as tail left works non modular. Bhukan Disty is the second offtake of Malik Branch. It is high level channel. Most part of the area under command is water logged. However, some good patches of land are also irrigated by this Disty. Overall performance is good.Bhukan Disty offtakes from RD 22500/L of Malik branch with authorized discharge of 13 cusecs and tail RD 17640. The details of total GCA/CCA, Major crops, number of outlets and last three year irrigation figures are provided in Annexure-F & H. Head Structure works modular but has no gate. The discharge table is also missing. There are 8 outlets designed as OFRB. Being a high level channel, shortage of supply is experienced in low flow days of Malik Branch. Designed velocity and bed slope adopted as 1.28 ft/sec. and 115000 respectively.As the head structure is without gate and regulation is being done by karries, so there is no permanent control and a lot of fluctuations ente the system which are very difficult to temper for equitable and fair distribution. As a result, the canal is almost never in steady state. The channel is also facing problems due to topography. Additional supplies are also distributed among the irrigators for reclamation purposes. Channel reach 0-7500 is in high filling. The bank position is weak, leading to loss of capacity in head reach with a smaller security margin for operation. There is no berm and free board available. Reach RD 7500-14000 passes through high level sandy dunes, when heavy wind storm carrying with dust blows in summer season, channel chokes up and the tail suffers. In the tail reach waterlogging patches are observed. There is no control point available on this channel to maintain water levels for better command, which effects modularity and efficiency.The official rotational schedule is strictly followed due to which targets of equitable distribution in low supply in Malik Branch are not achieved, and lot of variation in discharge at tails is observed. This is further aggravated due to non optimization of data collection and analysis and non performance of evaluation process. Supply conditions can be improved by provision of regulation gates at control point of Malik Branch RD 22900 just downstream of, the canal. Hydraulic data is collected and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily through Kot Sher Muhammad. For detail of existing and last year supply see Annexure-F. Strengthening with side protection in reach RD 2200-3500 (right and left side) is recommended due to settlement of local Abaddi's in this reach. In the rainy season a number of mishaps are observed. Trespassing and cattle ghats must be discouraged to increase channel efficiency. For more detail of hydraulic data see Annexure-G. Layout, communication link and administrative control has been provided at Annexure-B, D & E.Initially, channel tail was at R.D 23040 but on the request of share holders the tail was curtailed and some outlets were shifted to Malik Branch. L-Section and A-Form approved vide Superintending Engineer Bahawalnagar circle no 1135 dated 29-1-1994 has been implemented and now there is no maior tail shortage.Gajjiani Disty is one of the most important and major distributaries of Malik Branch in Malik Sub Division. It irrigates very fertile and lush green agricultural belt of land in Bahawalnagar and Chishtian tehsils. Number of well organized farms are being fed by this system and this Disty is playing a vital role in the agricultural sector of Bahawalnagar District. As a whole, the system has excellent command. The channel's overall condition and performance is good. Banks are in better condition with sufficient berm and free board. Hydraulically speaking, one can say that Gajjiani Disty is very sound and has a good security margin for operation and good potential for storage capacity in tempering the fluctuation inside the system.Gajjiani Disty offtakes from RD 38900 (right side) of Malik Branch. It is the major perennial distributary in Malik Sub Division designed with authorized discharge of 319 cusecs and total length of almost 27.99 canal miles. Water is distributed to secondary channels (minors) through 6 offtakes and 102 of direct outlets. It was designed with 45.2 ft W.S.W. in head reach with variation in bed slope from 1/5000 to 1/3046 ft. Design velocity was proposed as 1.74 ft/sec. with 4.4 ft F.S.D. It passes through a tract of land which is highly water logged and without proper drainage system. Total GCA/CCA, three year irrigation figures and detail of major crops are provided in Annexure-F. Water levels along the channel for improvement in command and efficiency are maintained through control points at Rd's 53200, 77250, 84000, 98750, 106200, 108980, 110900 and 138400 with excellent working head except falls Rd 77250 and 84000. For hydraulic data see Annexure-G. These two falls are non modular due to certain reasons. Head regulator is a gated mechanical structure with modular working. Discharge table is available but required rechecking.Gajjiani Disty has good a working head while offtaking from the parent channel•. It can be fed with very low supplies in Malik Branch. Most of the channel reach is in high filling. It has excellent inner and outer prism. Under rehabilitation project, work for strengthening of banks with necessary provision of protection works, berm formation and brick lining in tail reach RD 114 139905 was done in the 1993-1994 financial year. Most of the outlets are APM and OFRB. This channel is required to run more than authorized due to certain reasons. One of the major reasons is the excessive withdrawal of offtaking channels and the discharge variation, which can be seen in Graph-X. Out of six offtaking channels, five are without regulation gates. The regulation is done by wooden Karries due to which it is very difficult to control the excess supplies especially in this political era. That is why, for the feeding of whole system as per A.F.S, in Kharif season, channel is required to feed more than authorized by about 15%. Additional supplies are also supplied to the irrigators for reclamation purposes. For detail of existing and last year supply see Annexure-F. This valuable supply can be saved by providing regulation gates at all offtaking channels. Chak Abdullah Minor is already provided with a regulation gate.The official rotational schedule is followed strictly as approved by the competent authority. The discharge at the head is most of the time higher than design discharge, leading to scouring of bed and erosion of sides in first two head reaches, giving less security margin for operation in these eroded sites, making loss in capacity and for potential storage of channel. Overall channel reach is in good shape. Moreover, offtaking channels are not taken into account in the rotation, which is a reason why the first few offtaking channels have a better performance than the offtaking channels in the tail reach. The targets or objectives of water distribution for these offtaking channels are not fixed and clear, leading to problems in the implementation of orders in the field for equitable and fair distribution among the offtakings as per share. This is further aggravated due to non optimization of data collection and analysis activities and non performance of evaluation process. A lot of responsibility for feeding the offtakings is left to gauge readers, who are not capable of making fair decisions for equitable distribution. No doubt, in routine management, they perform a good local control. But this local control cannot tackle the fluctuations that enter the system. Rather they are amplified by operations inside the sub division, where a lot of variable discharges were received at different tails. Due to this lack of control inside the system, the canal is almost never in steady state and gates at the head are operated at different intervals. Most of the channel has an excellent command, but some lift outlets also exist. Channel reach RD 8 to 11, 23 to 25 , 27 to 33, 66 to 73 and 82 to 84 is in cutting. Heading up of channel in low supply days with regulation karries have been approved at RD 23000 for feeding some upstream lift outlets. The channel has siltation problems in various reaches. Especially reach RD 77-84 experiences a lot of silt deposits. There is a canal rest house (Gajjiani) situated at RD 93-94 (rifht side), which is in a good working condition. A telegraphic system is also available at Gajjiani, but nowadays it is not working. Data of the system in Gajjiani section are conveyed nowadays through Chak Abdullah, a telegraphic station on the Fordwah system. As explained above reach RD 98-139905 has excellent topography with lined portion in tail reach, but unfortunatelyI due to some constructional defects, lined reach is facing the following problems: a) Silt deposits b) Overtopping c) Weed growth However overall efficiency of the tail is good. There is no chronic tail shortage. After lining the tail reach, the tail outlets are successfully meeting the water requirements of Chishtian city. This channel has not much tendency of mishaps/breaches due to its strong outer prism. Although in rainy season, there is a tendency of closing the outlets, however due to lined tail portion, less number of mishaps can be observed as compared to channels having earthen section. The head reach of the channel impacts more on waterlogging as compared to the tail reach and soil has poor drainage properties.As the channel runs as per approved rotational program which means low discharges, in 2nd and 3rd preference, excessive berm growth can be observed in reach RD 53200 to 114000. Hydraulic structures need repair. Discharge tables at various offtaking points need rechecking. Details of layout, communication link and administrative control has been provided in Annexure B, D & E.Dhaban Minor is the first offtake of Gajjiani Disty with intensively water logged and salinity effected area in command. Lush green orchids and valuable fertile patches of land has suffered from water excess and people have no way for their survival. They are helpless and looking with some good expectations towards I&PD for their remedies.Dhaban minor offtakes from Gajjiani Disty at RD 17000/R with authorized discharge of 17 cusecs and a tail RD of 25470. The head regulator has not been provided with gate and gearing. The discharge table is missing. For detail of total GCA/CCA, three year irrigation intensities. Major crops and outlets, see Annexure-F. There are 15 outlets. Four are lift outlets (pipes) whereas others are designed as OFRB. Hydraulic data at the head and tail is collected under supervision of SBE. Kot Sher Muhammad and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily. The channel was designed with 10ft W .S.W. and 1.5 ft F.S.D. in head reach. Bed slope was to vary from 1/2857 to 1/2500. Water levels are maintained through two control points at Rd 8100 & 9100 which work modular. For information see Annexure-G.Perennially designed Dhaban minor has a sufficient working head while offtaking from parent channel and runs through a tract of land which is highly water logged, especially the tail reach. No tail shortage is observed. Some lift outlets are also provided on this channel. There is heavy Jungle/Sarkanda growth along the banks. This channel draw excessive supply even in the days of slake demand, when the water logged tail reach requires less or some time almost nil supply. This channel has to run full due to feeding of high level area and outlets in upper reach, so there is a wastage of valuable supply. For existing and last year supply conditions see Annexure-F. Channel has different topography in total run. Rd 0 to 7COO is balance, RD 7000 to 9100 is in cutting and RD 9100 to tail is in filling. Additional supply is also given for reclamation purposes. In rainy season, excess supply at tails is the major issue to be adhered. Silt deposits and heavy berm growth is also observed. As the head structure is without gate, regulation is done by wooden karries, and most of the time the discharge is higher than the design, leading to waterlogging itself and reduction in supply for the parent system in lower reaches. Banks are weak, giving lesser security margin for operation. Data collection and an'alysis activities are also not optimized. For information of layout, communication link and administrative control see Annexure-B, D & E.Thakt Mahal Minor is the 2nd major offtake of Gajjiani Disty. It irrigates a vast strip of land bounded by Fordwah Branch in the north, Gajjiani Disty and Chak Abdullah Minor in the south. Most of the commanded area is water logged and salinity effected. However some lush green orchids and very fertile land patches are included in the command.Thakt Mahal Minor was designed perennially for the distribution of 37 cusecs of discharge through 23 outlets designed as OFRB in total length of 8.2 canal miles. Detail of total GCA/CCA, number of outlets, major crops and last three year irrigation figures are provided in Annexure-F. The head regulator is without gate, but works modular. The discharge table is also missing. Falls at Rd 7000, 13000, 13860, 18500 and 22500 have excellent working head contributing a lot to maintain water levels in the total run and to improve command. For hydraulic data see Annexure-G. The data collection is supervised by SBE, Kot Sher Muhammad and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily. For existing and last year supply conditions see Annexure-F. The channel was designed with 13 ft W.S.W. and 2 ft F.S.D. in head reach. Bed slopes were proposed to vary from 0.225 to 0.34 per 1000 ft. with variation in water levels from 524.18 to 499.00.Due to modularity and good availability of head excessive withdrawl is the major operational issue. There is no control over regulation due to non availability of regulation gates. Sometimes people/irrigators in the upper reach of the channel remove the regulation karries which are adjusted to control excess entry, to irrigate their fields without any departmental permission/ supervision due to which mishap/overtopping can be observed in some reaches. In rainy season, the tail reach is affected by excess supply pressure and channel regime disturbed. The bank position is good, but strengthening is needed in some reaches with necessary treatment to pucca and inner section.Topography is very interesting. Reach Rd 0 to 6500 is in cutting, Rd 6500 to 13000 is balanced and Rd 13000 to tail is in high filling with adjoining area water logged. Soil is of good nature in head reach and poor in tail reach with low properties of drainage. In rainy season, outlet closing tendency is observed. Silt deposits and growth of weeds can be noticed in low supply periods. Periodically re-sectioning is needed to feed tails. A number of outlets require readjustment. For more information of layout, communication link and ad ministrative control see Annexure-B, D & E.Chak Abdullah Minor is the major offtake of Gajjiani Disty with almost 13 miles length and difficult topography. Tail shortage and waterlogging are the basic problems.Operational Issues-Chack Abdullah Minor offtakes from Gajjiani Disty at RD 53200/R with authorized discharge of 56 cusecs and tail RD 65000.For detail of total GCA/CCA, Irrigation figures and Major crops and outlets see Annexure-F. There are 28 direct outlets, out of which 4 are lift. Channel head is provided with regulation gate with discharge table which requires rechecking. Hydraulic data is collected under supervision of SBE, Gajjiani and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily. There are falls at Rd 19390,22000,24000,25650 & 25850 with excellent head which have significant effect on command and maintain the water level in the total run. For detailed information of hydraulic data see Annexure-G. Channel was designed with 19.60 ft W.S.W. and 2.10 ft F.S.D. in head reach. Bed slopes were proposed to vary from 1/4444 to 1/3500.Tail shortage and water logging are the burning issues of this channel. Tail shortage is experienced due to certain reasons, especially the channel topography which is very interesting. Reach RD 0-4 is partly in filling and partly in cutting. Reach RD 4-21 is in cutting. This part of channel passes through high level sandy dunes. In summer season, when heavy wind storm carrying dust flows, this reach is abnormally chocked and silted up due to which channel regime is disturbed and capacity reduced with less security margin for operation and use of potential storage. The working head at offtaking point also suffers and flow varies from free orifice to submerged orifice which ultimately effects the with drawl from parent. The flow in the channel is most of the time on the margin and tail suffers with decrease in agricultural production. Although the channel has a gated structure with sufficient head, the silting up of the head reach and the fact that one offtaking channel at RD 8500 i.e. Madrissa sub minor has a good modularity than parent channel, fair distribution is not achieved and any fluctuation passed into the lower portion is difficult to temper. Some reclamation supplies are released to irrigators in Kharif, which has an additional impact on channel efficiency.In 1994-95 closure, no re-sectioning work was carried out in the head reach, which is why in the present flow season, Department has to face a difficult situation. By deputing regular establishment of Gajjiani and Kot Sher Muhammad sections to reach RD 9-21, the problem was treated upto some extent and supply at tail made up. In low supply days, berm formation/growth of jungle and weeds in tail reach are observed. Lengthy reach also has an effect on the tail. To overcome tail shortage and to save the department some hardship, a PC-1 (Planning Commission proform No.1) for brick lining of tail reach RD 49950 to 65000 (tail) has been prepared and submitted. Reach RD 22-65, which is in high filling is weak without berm and free board, giving a high risk in full demand and in rainy season, when upper reach irrigator's close their outlets, and heavy excess accumulate in tail reach. A number of overtopping cases has been observed. For existing and last year supply conditions see Annex \"F\". Layout, communication link and administrative control has been provided in Annexure-B, D & E.MADRISSA SUB MINOR Madrissa Sub Minor is an important offtake of Chak Abdullah Minor with excellent command. Adjoining area in tail reach is water logged without proper drainage system.Madrissa sub minor offtakes from RD 8500 of Chak Abdullah minor with an authorized discharge of 17 cusecs and a tail RD of 17590. There are 10 OFRB outlets on this channel. For detail of total GCA/CCA, Irrigation figures, major crops, outlets & existing/last year discharge conditions see Annexure-F. The head is not provided with a regulation gate and this discharge table is also missing. Data is collected under supervision of SBE, Gajjiani and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily. There are falls at RD 2550, 2920, 7610 & 10500 for maintenance of water levels and improvements in command. For hydraulic data see Annexure-G. Tail reach is brick lined and there is no tail shortage.While offtaking from the parent channel, a sufficient working head is available for modular working. As the supply is controlled by regulation karries, this channel runs more than authorized which has adverse effect on tails of Chak Abdullah Minor (the paren channel). Reach Rd 0 to 3000 is in cutting and the soil is sandy. In summer season, when heavy wind storms carrying dust blow, this reach suffers badly and channel capacity decreases. Reach Rd 3000 to 7500 is in balanced condition with fertile soil and some weak sites due to trespassing and cattle ghats of nearby situated local abaddies. Reach Rd 7500 to tail is in filling with good bank position but having water logging and salinity problem. In rainy season, tail irrigators face excess supply problems due to closing of outlets in upper reach. For existing and last year supply conditions see Annexure-F. and for layout, communication net work and administrative control see Annexure-B, D & E.Kokni minor is a small but an important offtaking channel of Gajjiani Disty meeting with agricultural as well as domestic needs of the area under command. The channel command is good with some organized farming.Kokni minor offtakes from RD 77250/R of Gajjiani Disty. Its total GCA/CCA, three year irrigation figures, outlets, and major crops are given in Annexure-F. Its authorized discharge is 13 cusecs with tail RD 12750 and W.S.W. 8.5 ft. There are 7 outlets (OFRB). Bed slope was proposed to vary from 1/2857 to 1/2500 with design velocity at 1.25 ft/sec. The channel has sufficient working head while offtaking from the parent channel. The head regulator is without gate and the discharge table is also missing. Hydraulic data of the head and tail is collected and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily. There are falls at RD 4938,6400,6800 and 7300 with sufficient working head which provide excellent command to the area and maintain the water levels in total run. Working of these control points is modular. For hydraulic data of falls see Annexure-G. Layout of channel, communication network and administrative control has been provided in Annexure-B, D & E.As explained above, channel head structure is with out gate and modularity is good as compared to parent channel. The supply is adjusted by regulation karries, so excess authorized is the major issue which has adverse affect on tail of Gajjiani system as well as waterlogging after tail reach of the channel. Unfortunately, there is no proper drainage system, so very fertile and valuable agricultural land is being wasted every year. Channel topography is balance, but the head reach is in cutting. As no restoration work has been carried out on this channel since long, banks, berms and service road have deteriorated abnormally, leading to reduction in capacity. Silt deposits and weed growth are observed in the tail reach. In rainy season, irrigator's has to face excess supply. For existing/last year supply conditions see Annexure-F.Fortunately, Chatala minor has an excellent working head as compared to the parent channel. Due to this fact the command is good and channel efficiency is remarkable. It irrigates very fertile and lush green tracts of land with few large farms.Chatala minor offtakes from RD 77250/L of Gajjiani Disty with authorized discharge of 11.5 cusecs and a tail at RD 10250. There are 7 OFRB outlets. Details of total GCA/CCA, Major crops and three year irrigation figures are provided in Annexure-F. The head structure is without gate and the discharge table is missing. However, the head works modular. There is no fall available in the total run of channel to maintain the water levels, which is why tails are in submerged conditions. Channel was designed with 6.6 ft W.S.W. and 1.6 ft F.S.D. with variation in slope 0.30 per 1000 ft. For layout of channel, communication network and administrative control see Annexure-B, D & E.Excessive withdrawl is the major issue due to unavailability of regulation gates which has dual affect i.e. 1) shortage at tail Gajjiani 2) water logging of area under command. Channel reach RD 0--5 is in balance topography and other reach is in filling. Heavy growth of Jungle/Sarkanda observed on right bank. The tail reach command area is water logged. There is no proper drainage system in this area. Tail irrigators face excess supply in rainy season. This channel often runs with a higher discharge than authorized. Data is collected under the supervision of SBE, GJN and conveyed to BWN daily through CAL tele-station. Tails are often in submerged condition. For detailed information of existing and last year supply see Annexure-F. There is no tail shortage experienced by the Department. In low supplies, this channel regime is disturbed due to excessive weed growth and increased silting tendency with decrease in channel capacity having adverse effects on tail in Kharif. Service road along left bank is lower than natural surface level, in rainy season inspection of channel becomes almost impossible and efficient control over channel con not be ensured.Chishtian minor is the last offtake of Gajjiani Disty. It covers a very fertile and lush green strip of Chishtian Tehsil. Holdings are small, however some well and scientifically organized forming also exists.Chishtian minor offtakes from RD 98750/L of Gajjiani Disty with authorized discharge of 23 cusecs and tail RD of 33500. There is no gated structure provided at the head. The discharge table is missing. Total GCA/CCA, three year irrigation figures and major crops are given in Annexure-F. There are 14 OFRB outlets. Bed slope varies from 1/4444 to 1/4000 with designed velocity at 1.2 ft/sec. Data is collected under supervision of SBE, GJN. For existing and last year supply conditions see Annexure-F. There are falls at RD.5300, 17500, 27900 and 30100 with excellent working head for maintaining water levels and improving command. For detail hydraulic data see Annexure-G. Layout of the channel, communication network and administrative controls information has been provided in Annexure-B, D & E.As explained above, channel has no gated structure but due to availability of excellent working head, it works free modular and even in low supplies it take its due share of supply from parent channel. But due to least control over tempering of fluctuation in parent channel, the discharge at head is most of the time lower than the design discharge, leading to siltation in the upstream reaches. This has resulted in a loss of the capacity of channel giving a smaller security margin for operation and very variable discharges are received at tails with almost non steady state of flow in channel. Initially, this channel had tail approximately at RD 38000, then tail curtailment was done and tail proposed at RD 33500. Tail irrigators again applied for shifting of their land on Fateh Disty (Tail offtake of Malik Branch runs parallel to Chishtian minor in this reach) and tail curtailment at RD 30100 was approved vide worthy SE, Bahawalnagar number 1832 dt 23/2/1995. As per decision, the sanctioned discharge at head is now 17 cusecs and at tail is 0.46 cusecs. This decision will be implemented in near future after observing formalities.The channel topography is excellent. Reach RD 0 to 16500 and 18000 to 25600 is balance in cutting and filling, where as remaining part of the channel is in high cutting. Channel has silting problems in reach RD 0 to 17500 where the tail reach is abnormally effected by weeds growth. Low supplies in 2nd and 3rd preference further adds toward chacing up the channel, thus reducing authorized carrying capacity. Banks are quite strong with necessary free board and berm. There is less effect of water logging on the channel command as compared to other Gajjiani system command. In rainy season, heavy excess due to closing of outlets in upper portion of Gajjiani system is experienced by the channel which some time causes over topping and breaching, but this occurs rarely. The rainfall also disturbs the regime in the cutting portion of the channel due to entering of muddy run off from high level surroundings. Erosion of banks is observed. However over all channel condition is satisfactory. For more information regarding existing and last year supply conditions see Annexure-F.Sirajwah Disty is an important offtake at the tail of Eastern Sadiqia Canal. It replaces an old inundation (Malikwah) canal. It plays a vital role in agricultural sector of the area. The channel has an excellent prism. It provides facilities, for irrigation, drinking and other domestic needs of the area. Overall channel command is affected by water logging and salinity. Holdings of the people are small, but some well organized farms are contributing a lot in increasing the agricultural, social and economic values of the people. Sirajwah Disty is designed perennially for 197 cusecs from the tail of Eastern Sadiqia canal RD 245000 as a component of the Sutlej Valley Project. At the head a gated structure is available. Flow conditions are submerged orifice. A discharge table is available but requires rechecking. At the tail it bifurcates into two minors namely Bahadurwah and Najibwah. Detail of total GCA/CCA, last three year irrigation figures are given in Annexure-F. Water is distributed through 36 direct outlets, most of which are OCAPM, OCOFRB, APM and OFRB. There are only two control points available in the total run, i.e. at Rd 21800 and 58825 with design working head 0.46 ft and 0.44 ft respectively to control the water levels and ultimately to improve command. For detail see Annexure-G. The channel has a total length of 13.54 canal miles with 36 ft water surface width at head and 25.2 ft at tail. Designed velocity varies from 1.48 ft/sec to 1.51 ft/sec. Bed slope provided 1110000 to 1/8000 per 1000 ft. Full supply level was proposed 538.50 at head and 530.20 at tail which has now been abnormally disturbed.Operational Issues Sirajwah Disty's flow is submerged orifice while offtaking from parent channel. The discharge at head is most of the time higher than design discharge, leading to abnormal distribution in inner prism with high siltation in head reach. Channel capacity is reduced up to dangerous limits. Feeding of the system under such circumstances is a major operational issue and department has to face hard time especially in Kharif season when demands are in full swing and additional reclamation supplies are also required. This channel runs parallel on right side of Hakra Branch. There is no proper drainage system in this area. Released reclamation supplies distributed among the irrigators in Kharif season to reclaim the affected soil is not of such quantity as actually required. High seepage rate from Hakra Branch and rain fall in monsoon further adds to water logging. Poor drainage is the basic problem of this area.Present alignment of the canal is the same as the alignment of old inundation canal which was the only source of irrigation in this area in 1860's. This fact is very clearly observed from the existing conditions. But, un fortunately, no strengthening work has been carried out since long due to which existing position is not very appreciable and this has resulted in a loss of the capacity, giving a smaller security margin for operation.As discussed above, there are only two hydraulic control points available on this channel to maintain water levels at RD's 21800 and 58825 with 0.46 ft and 0.44 ft design working head. This head suffered due to silting tendency and ultimately 1.55 ft rise in water level was observed in a survey conducted under personal supervision of undersigned in 1994. Due to this rise in water level the falls are found to be almost non-modular and storage potential is not in use in present situation. Available free board is also little and not enough to pass authorized supply safely and number of overtopping/mishap cases have to be faced by the department. Heavy growth of jungle and sarkanda on 10 to 15 ft wide berm also provides hiding places for breeding animals which causes mishaps. Following are the maior issues to be dealt with. There are local villages situated along the channel in reach at RD 12-14 (right side), 46-48 (left and right side) and RD 59-60 (left side). These villages are in a low depression and the drainage system is poor with brackish ground water. Due to heavy trespassing and cattle ghats, the berm is under pressure and a permanent risk for mishaps exists. Most of the channel command is waterlogged, since whenever rainfall occurrs, irrigators close their outlets and heavy excess accumulates in lower reaches and the channel becomes under pressure.The official rotational schedule is strictly followed as approved by competent authority. However, the targets or objectives of water distribution are not clear, leading to problems in the implementation of orders in the field. Data at the head is collected by SDO Jalwala at regular intervals of 3 hours and conveyed to Bahawalnagar twice a day. Data at the tail of Sirajwah and head of Najibwah and Bahadurwah is collected and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily. For more details regarding existing and last year supplies see Annexure-F. The process of data collection and analysis is not optimized, and the evaluation process is almost not performed at all. A lot of responsibility is left to the gauge readers, especially in case of emergencies. In routine management, they perform a good local control. But this control cannot tackle the fluctuation that enter the system. This results a highly variable discharge at tail. Administrative control of Sirajwah system, Communication link and Layout of canals has been provided at Annexure-C, 0 & E.Bahadurwah is the major offtake of Sirajwah Disty. It has different nature of command. Water logging, salinity and variable discharge at tails are the basic problems. Overall channel efficiency is not very appreciable. Holdings are small. However, some lush green orchids and well organized farms are included in the command.Bahadurwah minor is a perennial offtake at the tail of Sirajwah. It was designed for distribution of 82 cusecs of discharge through 50 direct OFRB outlets and one small sub-minor i.e. 1 IR Bahadurwah. Its total GCA/CCA, detail of last three year irrigation figures and major crops are given in Annexure-F. There is no regulation gate provided at the head. A discharge table is also missing. Most of the outlets are OFRB, however, some APM outlets also exist. It was designed with 22 ft water surface width, 3 ft full supply depth in head reach and 4.7 ft water surface width, 1.2 ft full supply depth in tail reach. Designed velocity proposed was 1.38 ft/sec to 0.80 ft/sec, while bed slope varies from 1/7500 to 1/5000 ft. Critical velocity ratio is kept at 0.82 with three control points to maintain water levels in the canal. From hydraulic data Annexure-G it reveals that only 0.4 design working head available at offtaking point. Control points at RD 18700, 23000 & 37300 are contributing lot in improving the efficiency of command in a total length of 12.03 canal miles. Hydraulic data at head and tail is collected and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily under supervision of SBE, Sirajwah.Flow conditions are open channel due to non-modular working of the head structure and discharge is most of the time is lower than design, leading to siltation in the upstream reaches and highly variable discharge conditions at tails. This variability is further aggravated due to a topography which further creates hindrances. Reach Rd 2000 to 4900, 8500 to 25000 and 33000 to 37200 is in high cutting and passes through sandy dunes. In summer season, these reaches face problem of silting up, reducing the safe capacity, thus giving a smaller security margin for operation and becoming insufficient to pass the authorized supply. Channel reach RD 37200-55000 is in high filling and adjoining area is waterlogged. Banks are weak, without free board and berm. As explained in the case of Sirajwah Disty, whenever rainfall occurs, irrigators close their outlets and heavy excesses are received in the lower reaches with a lot of pressure on the channel section. So numerous mishaps, breaches, serious leakages cases are observed in the lower portion of the canal. This situation further adds to waterlogging of the area which is already abnormally affected and without proper drainage system. People of this area face a lot of problems for their survival and valuable agricultural land is also being wasted every year. However, some additional supplies are provided to irrigators for reclamation of their effected soil. Remedies for this aspect must be recommended.When the system runs, in 2nd OR 3rd preference, excessive berm formation and siltation can be observed in various reaches. In reach RD 3-4 (left sife), 9 11 (left and right side), there are local abaddies settled along the channel. Tress passing and heavy cattle ghats also adds to widen the channel, so that ultimately low velocities create problems. In the tail reach unloading is the major issue. The working of tail outlets is modular. However, supplies at tails are not distributed as per targets and tempering of this is very difficult. The rotational schedule is followed but the sub-minor has no control, which is a reason why it has a better performance than parent canal. The sub-minor which offtakes from RD 18100 with an authorized discharge of 3.51 cs and a tail at RD 5010 also passes through high level sandy dunes and faces a number of problems. Unloading, silt clearance and stable section are the major issues. Total GCA/CCA is 935/911 acres irrigated with 2 outlets which work modular. For existing and last year supply conditions see Annexure-F. Layout, Communication set up and Administrative control has been provided at Annexure-B, D & E.Najibwah Minor is an important offtake of Sirajwah Disty. It irrigates a very fertile strip of land in Bahawalnagar tehsil as well as meeting with the drinking antd other domestic requirements of Donga Bonga town. It is playing an important role in increasing the agricultural production of the area. Holdings are small, but some big and well organized farms are also included in the command.Najibwah minor offtakes from the tail of Sirajwah Disty at RD 61100/L with authorized discharge of 39 cusecs with its tail at RD 56315. The channel head works modular but without gate. The discharge table is missing. There are 23 outlets, mostly designed as OFRB. For detail of total GCA/CCA, number of outlets, major crops and three year irrigation figures see Annexure-F. The channel was designed with 13 ft W.S.W. in head reach and 4 ft W.S.W. in tail reach with variation in bed slope 1/5000 to 1/3000. The designed velocity was kept 1.34 to 0.80 ft/sec. with 1.5 ft free board. The water level varies from 528.30 to 512.80 in the total run, but hydraulically only one control point is available to maintain water levels. For detail of data see Annexure-G. Hydraulic data at head and tail is collected under supervision of SBE,. Sirajwah and conveyed to Bahawalnagar daily.The channel has excellent working head while offtaking from the parent channel. It mostly runs in excess, leading to disturbance in inner prism. At head no regulation gate is provided, so the supply is adjusted by regulation karries and lot of difficulties are experienced in balance running of channel. The topography is balanced with surrounding area badly waterlogged without a proper drainage system. The soils have poor drainage properties. The channel's overall condition is very deteriorated. The banks are very weak without free board and berm, reducing the capacity, and the security margin. In the rainy season, the outlets tend to be closed, which exerts heavy pressure on lower reaches, and number of overtopping/mishapes have been observed. In Kharif season, when reclamation supplies are released to irrigators the pressure on the channel is further aggravated and the department has to face a difficult situation. The second reach is very weak, and potential storage is not used leading to a variable discharge at tails and targets or objectives of equitable and fair water distributions are not achieved. It is also impossible to temper any fluctuation that enters the system. The official rotational program is followed and this canal has a better performance than the other minor offtaking from the same point. Data collection and analysis process are not optimized, and the evaluation process is almost not performed at all, which is the reason for the difference in efficiency of canals offtaking from the same point. A lot of regulation responsibility is left for the gauge reader which is not fair. He is good in routine management, but in decisions making factors, it is not always appreciable. The operation inside the system has a big scope for improvement. By keeping the present security margin, many artificial fluctuations can be suppressed, stabilizing the discharge at tails. Donga Bonga Canal Rest House is situated at RD 18-19 (left side), The telegraphic station is also situated at Donga Bonga. Data of Sirajwah system are conveyed to Bahawalnagar through this telegraphic station. Details of communication link up, administrative control and layout of channel has been given in Annexure-B, D & E.From precise study of canals in chapter 2, the difficulties/problems being faced by the Department can be categorized under four major heads. One of the major problem with PID incharge staff is to identify the actual and exact issues. Lack of modern and scientific Engineering implements, well polished and experienced staff are the major drawbacks to collect existing data and then to propose correct remedy. However, if correct information may be found out then availability of funds is a separate issue. This situation is very dangerous and alarming. Following are the major issues linked with maintenance:Weak and poor bank conditions Non availability of proper berm and free board Jungle/sarkanda growth Excessive berm formation Abnormal erosion and scour Trespassing and cattle ghats Desilting Adjustment of outlets Repairing of head regulators and damaged pucca structures Replacement of bridges slabs Fighting against overflow, mishaps, breaches and cuts Fighting against heavy wind storms carrying dust and sand Fighting against heavy seepage rate Constructional defects in lined reach of Gajjiani Disty Reaches where local abaddies are situated alo'ng the channels b) Information and Operation This is the major burning issue of the time and the PID is facing hard time in the shape of tail shortage. Any research in this field will definitely help the Department to overcome this issue. Malik Sub-Division is also facing tail • The abOve period is here taken to be 1 month (31 dayst. The authOfised discharge is, therefore. calculated by muftiplying the authorised discharge with 334 days."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3174206712.json b/main/part_2/3174206712.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..21e3dafcca88e65a35fa3425d5795de90fd66670 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3174206712.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b0bbc5468aa6d74751fdb5062c51a95e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/36c65592-50cd-4694-b527-b713389e5c35/retrieve","id":"1272855791"},"keywords":["climate change","floods","smallholder farmers","rainfed conditions","flood-tolerant varieties"],"sieverID":"ac76aca4-9df9-45e0-90fc-a8e7891e2578","content":"Climate change has intensified food security challenges, especially in Africa, where a significant portion of produce is reliant on smallholder farmers in rainfed conditions. Prolonged flooding and droughts, driven by erratic weather patterns, have significantly elevated the risk of food scarcity. Floods, in particular, have been responsible for severe crop losses, raising concerns about increasing import costs if this issue is not mitigated. Africa is actively working to mitigate the impacts of flooding and enhance food security, although progress has been gradual. Developing flood-resilient varieties is a promising strategy to address this challenge. We explored various flood types common in the region and observed a scarcity of research on flood-resilient varieties, particularly those adapted for anaerobic germination and stagnant flooding. Conversely, varieties bred for flash flooding, such as FARO 66 and FARO 67, have seen limited distribution, primarily confined to a few West African countries, falling short of the intended impact. In contrast, deepwater tolerance research dates back to the early 1900s, but commercialization of the varieties remains limited, with scarce information regarding their cultivation, coverage, and performance. Newly developed varieties, such as Kolondieba 2 and Kadia 24, have received less attention, leaving many farmers dependent on locally adapted cultivars specific to particular areas. Remarkably, despite the limited information, both released and local stress-tolerant cultivars exhibit substantial survival rates and yield advantages. For instance, FARO 66 and FARO 67 have demonstrated 1-3 t/ha yield advantages over recurrent parents under flooding stress. Nonetheless, further efforts are required to address various forms of flooding. To this end, AfricaRice collaborates with National Rice Development Strategies, IRRI, and other partners to promote research and development. While improved flood-tolerant varieties remain limited in scope across Africa, the financial gains for farmers are significant when compared to susceptible cultivars. As the continent's population continues to grow rapidly, there is untapped potential in African germplasms, making ongoing research and breeding strategies essential. Therefore, this review highlights the importance of intensifying efforts in screening and identifying flood-tolerant rice. Furthermore, it underscores the value of utilizing traditional flood-resilient cultivars in breeding to enhance the productivity of widely distributed and cultivated varieties.Rice serves as a dietary cornerstone for over half of the world's population (Muthayya et al., 2014). It contributes significantly, accounting for approximately 23% of the daily caloric intake (Chemutai et al., 2016). Asia has historically dominated rice production, with China and India jointly responsible for over 90% of the world's rice output (Fukagawa and Ziska, 2019). Nevertheless, substantial changes have been observed in Africa, driven by shifts in dietary preferences, population growth, and urbanization. Tsujimoto et al. ( 2019) highlight a significant surge in rice consumption, from 9.2 Mt. in 1990 to 31.5 Mt. in 2019. This rapid growth in consumption is beginning to strain production capacities. Ibrahim et al. (2022) reported that between 2009 and 2019, Sub-Saharan Africa's (SSA) average rice consumption stood at 27.4 Mt., surpassing the average production of 15.4 Mt. over the same period.This persistent deficit between production and consumption has made Africa heavily reliant on rice imports, incurring substantial costs [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2011]. Over the past five decades, Africa has experienced a notable increase in rice production, primarily attributed to the expansion of cultivated areas rather than substantial improvements in productivity (FAOSTAT, 2012). Africa's average rice yield lags significantly behind that of Asia, with African farmers harvesting an average of 2.28 tonnes per hectare (t/ha) compared to Asia's 4.61 t/ha (Arouna et al., 2021). This productivity gap is particularly pronounced among small-scale resource-poor farmers who practice rainfed agriculture (Hong et al., 2021). Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2011) asserts that addressing these constraints is essential to curb rice import dependence, which can be achieved through research and development efforts. Some of the major challenges for rice farmers across Africa are flooding and prolonged dry spells. These challenges have become more frequently pronounced as the largest African production areas are located in rainfed environments that suffer from weather variabilities [Diagne et al., 2013b;Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2019]. These abiotic constraints interact with harsh weather conditions, amplifying their detrimental effects. Recent data from Hong et al. (2021) emphasize that small-scale farmers are responsible for more than 90% of rice output in Africa. Rainfed farming dominates rice production in most Sub-Saharan African countries (Dramé et al., 2013), with nearly 70% of rice production occurring under rainfed conditions (Ibrahim et al., 2022). Rainfed lowlands, in particular, contribute significantly to rice production in Africa, encompassing approximately 37% of cultivated areas and yielding 48% of the production [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2011].However, the full potential of rainfed lowlands remains untapped due to challenges related to the adverse effects of floods (Agbeleye et al., 2019). It is evident that African major rice-growing areas are flood prone (Kuya et al., 2019), with varying water levels, crop stages during floodwater occurrence, and durations of water accumulation. Moreover, with the existence of various ecosystem types, even the types of flooding are different; some areas experience more than one type. These types commonly include floods at germination, flash floods, partial submergence, and prolonged deep water (Agbeleye et al., 2019). It is devastating that the impacts of flooding are capable of causing total crop losses, thus leading to famine. Therefore, addressing the challenges posed by floods is imperative to enhance rice productivity and expand rice cultivation areas, particularly in rainfed lowlands.Developing high-yielding, flood-tolerant rice is essential for ensuring resilience in rice farming (Bairagi et al., 2021). While extensive research has been conducted globally, there is limited and scattered research specific to Africa. Mackill et al. (2012) have reported the promising adoption of flood-tolerant varieties by the majority of farmers in Asia. However, this is not the case for Africa, where there are few reports regarding the adoption, distribution, and use of varieties capable of withstanding inundation. The intriguing scenario is that the continent possesses a wealth of rice cultivars suitable for genetic improvement. This offers promise for breeding efforts in the face of escalating weather challenges. Therefore, to potentially harness the rice-growing areas where floods are common, it is imperative to publicly reveal the current measures and future directions for developing flood-tolerant rice. As a result, this review aims to present Africa's current progress in addressing the various types of flooding stresses in rice cultivation.2 Overview of rice sector in AfricaRice plays a vital role in ensuring food availability and income security for both rural and urban populations in Africa. Smallholder farmers are at the forefront of rice production, with more than 80% of the total production in Africa attributed to them (Sie et al., 2012;Tanaka et al., 2017). The expansion of rice cultivation has shown varying trends over the years, and it is evident that the increase in production is primarily linked to the expansion of cultivation areas. Balasubramanian et al. (2007) pointed out that there is an immense potential for rice cultivation in Africa, with approximately 239 million hectares of potential wetlands available. However, it is unfortunate that less than 5% of this land is currently utilized for rice cultivation. A report by the FAO in 2008, cited by Rodenburg and Johnson (2009), indicated a significant 105% increase in harvested rice area over three decades, which was driven by the growing demand for rice.According to Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2011), the total area utilized for rice production in Africa was around 10 million hectares, encompassing all African countries engaged in rice cultivation. Nigatu et al. (2017) highlighted that in 2016, the harvested rice area in Sub-Saharan Africa reached 11.2 million hectares, representing a 4.2% increase between 2010 and 2016. However, the notable increase in production was primarily attributed to the expansion of cultivation areas rather than improvements in yield per hectare. In 2010, rice productivity in Africa was reported to be 2.1 t/ha, and this yield remained relatively consistent between 2014 and 2016 (Nigatu et al., 2017). Other studies by Roy-Macauley (2018) andTsujimoto et al. (2019) reported similar rice yields in the range of 2.1 to 2.35 t/ha for Sub-Saharan Africa. A more recent study by Arouna et al. (2021) estimated the average rice yield in Africa to be 2.28 t/ha, while Rodenburg and Saito (2022) indicated that Africa's rice yield is around 2 t/ha.Comparing these yield figures to the potential yield gap of 2-10 t/ ha reveals that Africa is currently achieving only a fraction of its rice production potential. Addressing the constraints that limit The trends in rice production in Africa reveal a general increase in production, although this increase has not kept pace with the growing demand for rice. Longtau (2003) highlighted that West Africa, in particular, had the highest production and consumption of rice in Africa, accounting for 64.2% of production and 61.9% of consumption. Notable rice-producing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) identified by Rodenburg and Johnson (2009) include Nigeria, Madagascar, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Egypt, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Mali, Côte d'Ivoire, Tanzania, and Mozambique. Mutiga et al. (2021) and Nigatu et al. (2017) noted that nearly 80% of rice production and consumption in SSA can be attributed to Nigeria, Madagascar, Côte d'Ivoire, Tanzania, Mali, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Senegal.Recent data from FAOSTAT ( 2023), which provides information on harvested rice area and production, confirm that West Africa has the largest harvested rice area and highest actual production among the five African regions (Table 1). In contrast, Southern Africa recorded the lowest rice area and production. Nigeria stands out as the leading rice producer in Africa, surpassing all other countries by a significant margin. In 2020, Nigeria's rice production reached 8.17 Mt., making it the largest producer on the continent. Egypt, Madagascar, Tanzania, and Mali also feature among the top riceproducing countries (Table 2). While some countries experienced a decline in rice production between 2010 and 2015, such as Madagascar, Tanzania, and Sierra Leone, most of Africa's major riceproducing nations saw an increase in production during this period. From 2015 to 2020, only Côte d'Ivoire and Egypt reported a reduction in rice production among the ten selected major rice producers in Africa.Overall, the upward trend in rice production in recent years is primarily attributed to the expansion of rice cultivation areas, the introduction of rice varieties with desirable cooking traits and reduced shattering, productive research efforts such as the development of NERICA varieties, the involvement of farmers in varietal development, and increased awareness of good agricultural practices (Mogga et al., 2018;Arouna et al., 2021;Bin Rahman and Zhang, 2022).Africa's rice ecosystems are diverse and vary across countries, with differing representations and proportions. Balasubramanian et al. (2007) categorized rice ecosystems in Africa into five groups: deep water and mangroves (9%), rainfed upland (38%), rainfed lowland (33%), and irrigated (20%). However, there have been slight variations in these proportions reported by different sources. Rodenburg and Johnson (2009) revised these figures with a slightly different distribution, reporting rainfed upland (39%), rainfed lowland (33%), and irrigated (19%), while deep water and mangroves covered only 9%. The presence of deep water and mangroves was noted in the flood plains of the Niger River, covering countries such as Guinea, Mali, and Nigeria, while coastal areas of Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Gambia had mangrove ecosystems.Several other sources, including Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2010), Sakagami and Kawano (2011), Sie et al. (2012), Diagne et al. (2013a), andSuvi et al. (2020), have reported similar rice ecosystems with minor variations in the distribution percentages. Despite these minor differences, the general trend remains consistent, with rainfed upland being the largest ecosystem, followed by rainfed lowland and irrigated. According to Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2010), only 14% of the rice ecosystem is irrigated, while rainfed upland and lowland account for 40 and 37%, respectively. The distribution of these ecosystems can change over time due to shifts in land utilization patterns. Diagne et al. (2013a) reported a total rice cultivation area of 9.9 million hectares, with rainfed lowland (38%) being the most extensive ecosystem, followed by rainfed upland (32%) and irrigated (26%). In contrast, deep water and mangroves had the smallest share of rice cultivation area, with only 4% coverage. Generally, the distribution of rice ecosystems in Africa aligns with the findings of Diagne et al. (2013a) and Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2019), which indicate that more than 70% of the rice area in Sub-Saharan Africa is rainfed. Among these ecosystems, rainfed upland, rainfed lowland, and irrigated are the most widespread and dominant (Diagne et al., 2013a;Rodenburg and Saito, 2022). When it comes to rice production contribution, Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2011) reported rainfed lowland as the largest contributor, accounting for 48% of total production, followed by irrigated (33%) and rainfed upland (19%). Productivity levels also vary among these ecosystems, with irrigated rice typically achieving higher yields compared to rainfed systems. According to Ibrahim et al. (2022), the average rice yield in Sub-Saharan Africa is around 2 t/ha, while well-utilized rainfed and irrigated systems can produce 4-9 t/ha and 8-11 t/ha, respectively. Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2011) reported average yields of 1 t/ha for upland, 1-3 t/ha for lowland, and 3-6 t/ha for irrigated rice. However, these yields are still below the potential yields for each ecosystem, which are 2-4 t/ha, 3-6 t/ha, and 6-15 t/ha, respectively. Recent data published by Saito et al. (2019) indicated actual yields of 1.6 t/ha for rainfed upland, 2.6 t/ha for rainfed lowland, and 3.9 t/ha for irrigated rice. These values, while improved, still fall short of the ecosystems' full potential yields.Over the years, there has been a persistent gap between rice production and demand in Africa. From 1961 to 2005, rice production grew at a rate of 3.23%, while demand outpaced it, increasing at a rate of 4.52% (Sie et al., 2012). Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2011) also noted this trend and reported a deficit of 9.68 Mt. of milled rice, resulting in a cost of 5 billion USD for imports. This deficit persisted as the average rate of increase in rice production from 1970 to 2009 (3.3%) lagged behind the rate of consumption growth (4.0%). In recent years, there have been notable increases in rice production. For instance, in 2009, Seck et al. (2010) reported a production of 16 Mt. of milled rice, a significant milestone compared to the mere 2 Mt. produced in Sub-Saharan African countries in 1961. Zenna et al. (2017) compared rice production trends from 1992 to 2002 and 2003 to 2013, revealing an increase of 2 and 4%, respectively. This increase was attributed to the expansion of production areas, the use of improved varieties, and the adoption of modern agricultural inputs. Despite these production gains, rice imports have continued to rise. In 1961, only 0.5 Mt. of rice was imported into Africa from outside the continent (Seck et al., 2010). By 2003, this had grown to an imported rice cost of 1.5 billion USD (Balasubramanian et al., 2007). More recent statistics have also shown an increase in rice imports, primarily due to the rising consumption of rice among African nations (Rodenburg and Saito, 2022).According to the FAO statistics for Crops and Livestock Products in 2023, total rice production in Africa reached 36.2 Mt. in 2020, up from 26 Mt. in 2010 and 30.8 Mt. in 2015. Despite this increase in production, rice imports have continued to grow. The annual report for 2016 by Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2017) indicated that demand for rice in some African countries ranged from 10 to 90%, leading to an annual import cost of 5.5 billion USD to meet requirements. The consumption of rice in Africa has been on the rise. Tsujimoto et al. ( 2019) observed a significant increase in rice consumption from 9.2 Mt. in 1990 to 31.5 Mt. in 2019. In 2018, Africa spent almost 6 billion USD on importing nearly 25% of its rice for consumption. The average annual rice consumption from 2009 to 2019 was reported to be 27.4 Mt., while production lagged at only 15.4 Mt. (Ibrahim et al., 2022). Rodenburg and Saito (2022) noted that African rice imports accounted for almost 40% of the rice consumed, with the primary driver being the increasing demand for rice.Projections for the future suggest that rice consumption will continue to rise. The FAO (2023b) projects a further increase in consumption to reach 34.9 Mt. in 2025. Nigatu et al. (2017) have also highlighted the risk of importing more rice, projecting an increase from 27 to 35 Mt. in 2026 if corrective measures are not implemented. These trends underscore the urgency of addressing the gap between rice production and consumption in Africa.3 Rice production challenges and opportunities in Africa 3.1 Challenges Diagne et al. (2013b) have categorized the challenges facing African rice farmers into various categories, including biotic, soilrelated, and climate-induced factors. Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2011) emphasizes that these factors are further exacerbated by socioeconomic constraints. These challenges encompass a wide range, such as iron toxicity, droughts, floods, cold salinity, weed infestations, diseases, birds and rodent pests, suboptimal seed quality, impoverished soils, and inadequate post-harvest technologies (Balasubramanian et al., 2007;Rodenburg and Johnson, 2009;Diagne et al., 2013b;Van Oort, 2018;Hong et al., 2021).The primary focus of this review is on flooding, a major challenge in both rainfed lowlands and irrigated areas. It is often triggered by unpredictable rains associated with climate change (Agbeleye et al., 2019). Farmers have recognized this stress, which ranks second only to drought in terms of its impact, accounting for a 27% yield loss across all ecological zones (Diagne et al., 2013b). The impacts of flooding are observed throughout lowland rice-growing areas, and in particularly stressful years, farmers experience total crop failure. This challenge manifests in various forms, affecting different stages of the rice production cycle, from sowing to harvest. Flooding affects germination, tillering, plant survival, lodging, spikelet fertility, grain weights, and ultimately yields. It also hinders the recovery of most rice cultivars (Panda and Barik, 2021). In addition to flooding, other challenges significantly impact rice production in Africa. Drought, for instance, is a devastating impediment to rice production for African farmers. It resulted in a yield loss of 29% during the 2009-2010 period across all rice ecosystems, with upland rice being particularly susceptible (Diagne et al., 2013b). Moreover, weeds have consistently emerged as one of the most formidable biotic challenges, especially in rainfed rice farming, where yields can be less than 1 ton per hectare [Rodenburg and Johnson, 2009;Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2011]. Parasitic weeds, including the Striga genus, inflict substantial monetary losses, estimated to range between 111 million and 200 million USD annually [Rodenburg and Johnson, 2009;Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2017]. Other pests such as the African rice gall midge, birds, and rodents also pose significant threats to rice production. Furthermore, rice in Africa faces diseases such as bacterial leaf blight, Rice yellow mottle virus, and blast. Bacterial blight, for instance, inflicted yield losses ranging from 35 to 52% in Niger and 25% in the northern part of Benin [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2011;Suvi et al., 2020].Mineral toxicity, particularly iron toxicity, has afflicted numerous African countries, leading to yield losses ranging from 10% to a staggering 100% (Melandri et al., 2021). West African nations have borne the brunt of the iron toxicity challenge, with nearly 60% of their cultivated areas affected (Sikirou et al., 2018). Likewise, the detrimental impact of excessive aluminium on rice crops has become increasingly apparent, affecting approximately 18.8% of rice-growing regions in Africa. Besides the biotic and abiotic challenges, the financial constraints and limited awareness among smallholder farmers pose significant barriers to their access to improved agricultural inputs and technologies. In addition to these challenges, many African soils suffer from nutrient deficiencies, particularly in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and zinc (Zn) (Mohammed et al., 2014;Tsujimoto et al., 2019;Hong et al., 2021). It was found that more than 37.6% of rice-growing areas in Africa grapple with low soil nutrient levels, leading to reduced crop yields (Haefele et al., 2014). Furthermore, access to quality seeds and varieties represents another major challenge to sustainable rice farming in Africa, as highlighted in the Africa Rice Center's annual report of 2010. Similarly, Futakuchi and Saito (2021) observed farmers' overreliance on saved seeds for crop cultivation.Finally, the post-harvest phase of rice production experiences losses in value, ranging between 15 and 50% (Somado et al., 2008). These losses result from suboptimal post-harvest practices, including the presence of impurities, chalkiness, heat damage, and a high quantity of broken rice [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2016]. Sub-Saharan Africa experiences post-harvest losses ranging from 9 to 17%, amounting to an estimated 14-600 million USD in losses each year [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2018]. Therefore, addressing these challenges is paramount for enhancing both the quality and quantity of rice production and, subsequently, improving overall food security in the region.Africa's rice production landscape stands as a realm of untapped potential, awaiting realization through a dedicated embrace of research and development endeavors aimed at fostering sustainable rice farming practices [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2011]. The age of heavy rice imports, which has placed undue pressure on Africa's economic resources, must give way to a future where the continent takes charge of meeting its own rice demands. The sluggish pace of rice production growth in Africa, attributed to the underutilization of available arable land and persistently low productivity levels, calls for a strategic transformation (Ragasa and Chapoto, 2017;Rodenburg and Saito, 2022). Africa possesses the intrinsic potential to attain selfsufficiency once it commits to strategies that optimize land utilization and enhance overall productivity (Arouna et al., 2021).Remarkably, Africa boasts vast expanses of land amenable to rice cultivation, yet only a fraction of its fertile wetlands currently witness the plow [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2011]. Astonishingly, out of the over 200 million hectares of wetlands spanning the African continent, a mere 5% find themselves under the cultivation of rice. It is this very underutilized land that, when accessed and cultivated, holds the power to significantly augment rice production. Furthermore, addressing the gap in the availability and accessibility of high-yielding rice varieties represents a pivotal opportunity for productivity enhancement [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2010]. Across the continent, farmers are predominantly cultivating traditional local rice varieties, relying on saved seeds year after year [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2012]. Yet beneath this challenge lies a wealth of diverse cultivars that remain ripe for improvement. Agricultural research institutions have been established in numerous countries, many with a particular focus on rice breeding. These initiatives promise to equip African farmers with superior quality and high-yielding rice varieties, consequently leading to an upsurge in output. Moreover, the rising demand for rice varieties tailored to withstand a gamut of stressors, from floods to prolonged dry spells, salinity, and nutrient imbalances, presents a compelling impetus for progress (Balasubramanian et al., 2007). The introduction of stresstolerant rice varieties signifies more than just an expansion of cultivated land; it holds the promise of significantly enhancing productivity. Going beyond the NERICAs, the Africa Rice Center has successfully developed Sahel, ARICAs, and WITAs high-yielding varieties that are finely tuned to suit various African ecologies and withstand prevalent stresses. These varieties have the potential to bolster the livelihoods and incomes of smallholder farmers (Arouna et al., 2017). By making strategic investments in this endeavor, the continent stands poised to breathe new life into long-abandoned agricultural lands, ultimately resulting in a substantial increase in rice production.To facilitate the rice transformative journey, the implementation of supportive agricultural policies takes center stage (FAO, 2023a). These policies wield the power to steer the trajectory of the rice sector's development (Clapp, 2017). They are inextricably linked to initiatives such as mechanization, the subsidization of agricultural inputs, and the provision of accessible loans to farmers (Arouna et al., 2021). These measures collectively ensure the efficient organization of farming activities, the timely application of agronomic practices, and the seamless management of the post-harvest value chain. In addition, these policies are aligning with the national rice development strategies (NRDS), which are now being implemented by the majority of African countries. Therefore, Africa stands at the cusp of a remarkable transformation, one that holds the promise of selfsufficiency in rice production. By harnessing its abundant resources, embracing research and development, and fortifying the supportive policy landscape, the continent is poised to unlock its full potential and emerge as a beacon of sustainable rice farming.4 Flooding and rice production in AfricaFlooding limits rice production, particularly in rainfed lowland ecosystems. This is exacerbated by the irregular and uncertain distribution of rainfall, in itself accelerated by climate change, which is a major concern today (Mackay, 2008). Weather variability has increased globally, and Africa's heavy reliance on rainfed agriculture makes it highly vulnerable to weather extremes, including floods (Agbeleye et al., 2019). Projections for the future suggest an escalation in the frequency and intensity of weather extremes due to climate change [Atanga and Tankpa, 2021;World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 2022]. A report by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA, 2022) identified 19 countries prone to floods with significant damage to farmlands. These countries include Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Niger, Nigeria, Liberia, the Central African Republic, Gambia, Guinea, Mauritania, Senegal, Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Mali, Cameroon, Benin, and Burkina Faso. In 2021, approximately 15 African nations also experienced flooding. Akinyoade et al. (2014) conducted surveys in countries such as Kenya, Ethiopia, and Mozambique. The results revealed that more than 90% of respondents perceived the existence of floods and droughts as a major threat to crops.Several countries such as Tanzania have a history of riverine flooding, especially in floodplains, which significantly affects overall agricultural productivity (Valimba and Mahe, 2020). Other countries, including Nigeria, Madagascar, Mali, Sierra Leone, Uganda, Burkina Faso, and Rwanda, have reported flood-related disruptions to agriculture in certain years [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2011, 2018;Anna et al., 2019]. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2022) projected an increase in the severeness of climate extremes. Hence, the organization estimated that Africa will need to spend nearly $50 billion USD annually by 2050 to mitigate these weather-related losses. Therefore, addressing the challenges posed by flooding in rice production can never be neglected in Africa. Ismail et al. (2012) identified four inundation stresses that rice farmers are likely to encounter: flooding at germination, flash flooding, long-term partial flooding, and deep water. They further distinguished these stresses, highlighting anaerobic germination, which encompasses submergence stress during germination caused by heavy rains occurring shortly after sowing. This phenomenon is prevalent among farmers who practice direct seeding. Flash floods are another perilous event that submerges crops for a short duration, typically one to two weeks, resulting in crop damage or death. This is distinct from long-term stagnant flooding, where water levels of 30-50 cm accumulate for a significant portion of the growing season. Stagnant flooding is sometimes referred to as partial flooding. Additionally, there are other types of flooding, such as deepwater and floating rice cultivation, where crops endure inundation up to several meters. Similar flooding stresses have been reported by researchers such as Bailey-Serres et al. ( 2010), Fukao et al. (2006), andMackill et al. (2012).Africa experiences similar types of flooding, consistent with global reports (Fukao et al., 2006;Bailey-Serres et al., 2010;Ismail et al., 2012;Mackill et al., 2012). Heavy rains can trigger flash floods, affecting both germination for directly seeded rice and submerging emerged seedlings for several weeks. Long-term water stagnation is another prevalent flooding type across African countries, characterized by the accumulation of water over an extended period during the rice-growing season, partially submerging crops (Agbeleye et al., 2019). Moreover, some coastal regions in Africa, such as Gambia and Guinea-Bissau, are prone to coastal floods, particularly in mangrove areas (Sakagami and Kawano, 2011). Additionally, there are regions where crops suffer from long-term complete submergence for over a month, as observed in areas cultivating deepwater and floating rice, notably in countries such as Chad, Mali, and Niger (Sakagami and Kawano, 2011).Adverse impacts of floods have been observed all over Africa, posing significant losses to crop production. These impacts encompass failures in rice germination for flooded soils, crop losses resulting from flash floods, lodging of rice plants, and diminished vigor in cases of long-term stagnant flooding (Agbeleye et al., 2019). However, addressing these challenges in African rice farming is complicated by limited information and the scarcity of flood-tolerant rice varieties, leaving farmers highly vulnerable to climate extremes such as flooding (Akinyoade et al., 2014).One region profoundly affected by flooding is Northern Ghana, where Atanga and Tankpa (2021) reported massive crop losses due to inundation, significantly affecting local food security. In Tanzania's Kilombero floodplain, rice yields have dwindled to a mere 1 tonne per hectare, with water-control challenges cited as a contributing factor for this agricultural setback (Kwesiga et al., 2020). West Africa, too, has faced the harsh consequences of long-term complete submergence, resulting in severe crop losses (Kawano et al., 2009;Sakagami et al., 2009;Sakagami and Kawano, 2011). In Uganda, over 2,000 acres of rice fields suffered significant damage due to floods, resulting in substantial yield losses (Anna et al., 2019).Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2018) noted that approximately 22% of rice production losses in Nigeria in 2012 were attributed to floods, primarily linked to the use of susceptible rice cultivars. Burkina Faso experienced a similar challenge, with an estimated 50% of the irrigated rice ecosystem suffering inundation, while Rwanda encountered 40% yield losses due to comparable circumstances [Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 2011]. A survey conducted by the Africa Rice Center in 2009-2010 reflected farmers' perceptions of flooding impacts, indicating an average yield loss of 27% across the rice ecosystem, with losses of 34, 27, and 25% in irrigated, rainfed lowland, and rainfed upland areas, respectively. Reed et al. (2022) reported that between 2009 and 2020, nearly 12% of people in Africa experienced food insecurity due to floods. Agbeleye et al. (2019) concurred that floods can result in losses ranging from 10 to 100%, depending on factors such as the rice cultivar., growth stage, floodFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 07 frontiersin.org duration, depth, and floodwater characteristics, as highlighted in Mackill et al. (2012). Akinyoade et al. (2014) found that only farmers using climate-resistant crop varieties and diversifying their crops were less sensitive to weather extremes. Floods are recognized for inhibiting gaseous exchange in plants by a factor of 10,000 times and disrupting normal respiration, making them particularly lethal to crop plants (Fukao et al., 2006). This interference with the plant's ability to respire and carry out essential metabolic functions leads to severe damage and even total crop losses, consequently causing acute food shortages.5 Overcoming flooding impacts 5.1 Research and global remarkable success on flood-tolerant rice 5.1.1 Anaerobic germination for direct-seeded rice Significant progress has been made in the identification and development of flood-tolerant rice varieties, as evidenced by a body of research (Mackill et al., 2012;Singh et al., 2017b;Kato et al., 2019;Mondal et al., 2020). This progress encompasses the characterization of morphological, physiological, molecular, and metabolic traits associated with flooding tolerance, as reported in the studies by Panda and Barik (2021) and Singh et al. (2017b). It is worth noting that most of these achievements have been concentrated in Asia as compared to other regions. In direct-seeded rice, the establishment of crops is particularly vulnerable to oxygen limitations associated with floods. Yamauchi et al. (1993) observed limited survival and uneven crop establishment when characterizing rice germination in flooded environments, even at relatively shallow depths of 2 to 5 cm. Under more stringent screening conditions, flooding at greater depths can lead to severe crop losses, as documented by Ismail et al. (2012).Numerous studies have examined various rice accessions for variations in tolerance under oxygen-deprived conditions, with notable contributions from researchers such as Angaji et al. (2010), Baltazar et al. (2019), andYang et al. (2022). High expression and increased activities of a key enzyme, ɑ-amylase, are crucial for ensuring the availability of sugars, which are essential for escaping stress (Ismail et al., 2009). It has been observed that cultivars capable of tolerating inundation during germination efficiently break down starch reserves to fuel the growing embryo and facilitate coleoptile access to air (Kretzschmar et al., 2015).Furthermore, coleoptile elongation has been identified as a key factor determining rice survival in flooded soils and is now widely used in screening processes (Hsu and Tung, 2015;Zhang et al., 2017;Kuya et al., 2019;Pucciariello, 2020;Su et al., 2021;Thapa et al., 2022). Researchers have also identified the involvement of hormones, such as ethylene, specific enzymes such as ɑ-amylase, ADH, and PDC, and major QTLs such as AG1 and AG2 in flood tolerance. This understanding has led to the development of flood-tolerant, high-yielding rice varieties through the introgression of these QTLs, and these varieties have been introduced to farmers (Mondal et al., 2020). The introduction of these introgressed cultivars has significantly improved germination and yield compared to previously used susceptible cultivars.In the event of flash floods, farmers' fields are completely submerged, which has a profound impact on crop survival and recovery (Septiningsih et al., 2009). Researchers have characterized Sub1, a quantitative trait locus (QTL) housing the Sub1A gene responsible for vegetative complete submergence tolerance (Xu and Mackill, 1996). Cultivars carrying the Sub1A1 allelic form of this gene were identified as capable of overcoming the stress and maintaining high underwater photosynthetic efficiency (Singh et al., 2020).Studies have revealed that the primary mechanism associated with this tolerance is a quiescence strategy (Bailey-Serres et al., 2010;Pucciariello and Perata, 2013). Tolerant cultivars successfully withstand flash floods, displaying non-elongation, high survival rates, conservation of energy reserves, and improved post-submergence recovery (Fukao et al., 2006;Bailey-Serres et al., 2010;dos Santos et al., 2017). Additionally, Pedersen et al. (2009) emphasized the importance of gas films in enhancing submergence tolerance, with these microlayers contributing to aeration even under stressful submergence conditions.Notably, the Sub1 gene has been introgressed into popular mega varieties through marker-assisted backcrossing (Mackill et al., 2012). Consequently, farmers in Asia have been utilizing improved Sub1 varieties, including IR 64 Sub1, Swarna Sub1, Ciherang Sub1, Samba Mahsuri Sub1, and BR 11 Sub1, which have significantly enhanced yield under stress conditions.Lowland areas often accumulate water for extended periods, partially submerging the crops, leading to a range of stressors affecting tillering, fertility, lodging, grain quality, and yield (Chattopadhyay et al., 2021). This challenge is particularly prevalent in low-lying fields prone to flooding. Some cultivars completely fail to survive during prolonged water stagnation.In a study by Vergara et al. (2014), the response of 626 accessions partially submerged with 50-60 cm of water up to maturity was investigated. Stagnant flood-tolerant genotypes were characterized by moderate elongation, in contrast to semi-dwarf and fast-elongating accessions, which exhibited poor performance and low survival rates. Additionally, tolerant lines displayed minimal starch depletion compared to intolerant ones. Consequently, tolerance was attributed to factors such as moderate elongation, enhanced tillering capacity, reduced starch depletion, and increased fertility. Singh et al. (2017a) reported the identification of 36 QTLs related to survival, growth traits, and yield under stagnant flooding conditions, primarily clustered on chromosomes 3 and 5. Chattopadhyay et al. ( 2021) identified 17 QTLs for partial submergence using a mapping population derived from a tolerant genotype, Rashpanjor, and Swarna, a widely grown high-yielding variety. Kato et al. (2019) highlighted IRRI119, IRRI154, and OR142-99 as released varieties with the ability to withstand stagnant flooding.Internode elongation has been recognized as a dominant mechanism for overcoming deepwater stress (Hattori et al., 2011). Tolerant cultivars maintain increased internode elongation to stay in contact with air, in contrast to non-elongating rice types.Since the discovery of the SNORKEL genes, SK1 and SK2, significant progress has been made in elucidating and confirming the mechanisms controlling tolerance (Hattori et al., 2009;Singh et al., 2017b). Additionally, the role of ethylene has been found to promote rapid internode elongation as a strategy for escaping water (Hattori 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1244460 Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 08 frontiersin.org et al., 2009). Importantly, once water recedes, deepwater-adapted cultivars keep their reproductive parts above the ground, a feature referred to as \"kneeing ability\" (Singh et al., 2017b;Nagai and Ashikari, 2023). Tolerant cultivars exhibit rapid growth, with a significant increase in height, equivalent to up to 25 cm per day (Singh et al., 2017b). Some of the most frequently cited varieties with improved performance in deepwater conditions include C9285, Bhadua, and BRRI Dhan91 (Shalahuddin et al., 2020;Nagai and Ashikari, 2023). These varieties have been instrumental in enhancing the understanding of the mechanism of tolerance in deepwater and improving resilience through QTL mapping in breeding programs.Overreliance on direct seeding has exposed African farmers to the challenges of flooding caused by unpredictable rains (Kuya et al., 2019). The inundation of fields reduces oxygen availability to germinating seeds, hindering successful crop establishment and necessitating costly replanting. Despite these drawbacks, direct seeding remains a highly favored method due to its water-, labor-, and time-saving advantages (Darko Asante et al., 2021). In response to the anaerobic stress caused by flooding, various initiatives have been undertaken in Africa, including screening for stress-tolerant rice. In a study by Agbeleye et al. (2019), a screening of Oryza glaberrima identified five accessions with higher percent survival rates during anaerobic germination compared to the tolerant check variety, Khao Hlan On. These accessions are TOG 5980, TOG 5485, TOG 5505, TOG 16704, and TOG 8347. Currently, work is in progress to identify the QTLs associated with tolerance through bi-parental crosses, using these accessions and local sensitive cultivars.Another screening conducted by Darko Asante et al. ( 2021) identified five genotypes capable of withstanding anaerobic stress. These genotypes, namely, OBOLO, ART68-12-1-1-B-B, ART64-31-1-1-B-B, CRI-1-21-5-12, and CRI-Enapa, displayed strong emergence from flooded conditions, with survival rates exceeding 75%. Presently, the Climate Smart African Rice Project, funded by DANIDA, is actively engaged in research aimed at developing flood and salinitytolerant rice varieties. One of the project's key components is the identification of donors with tolerance to anaerobic stress during germination. The most recent achievements under this project include the identification of ten potential donors exhibiting anaerobic stress tolerance during germination (Mwakyusa et al., 2023). These donors are as follows: Afaa Mwanza 1/159, IB126-Bug 2013A, Kanamalia, Kubwa Jinga, Magongo ya Wayungu, Mpaka wa Bibi, Mwangaza, Rojomena 271/10, Wahiwahi, and Tarabinzona. They were selected based on both phenotypic tolerance and genomic values. The donors hold significant potential for future work involving QTL mapping with bi-parental or multi-parental populations.In cases where rice crops are completely submerged at the early stages of establishment, even for short durations, survival is compromised, and recovery is uncertain. Many lowland rice production areas in Africa are prone to frequent floods, which can devastate crop growth (Diagne et al., 2013b). One historically significant discovery in addressing this issue is the Sub1 QTL, a major genetic locus controlling tolerance to complete submergence (Xu and Mackill, 1996). This QTL facilitates tolerance by conserving energy as a survival response (dos Santos et al., 2017). Sub1 has shown promise and has been beneficial to African farmers in flood-prone rice-growing areas.In Africa, a significant milestone was achieved through the Stress-Tolerant Rice for Africa and South Asia (STRASA) project, a collaboration between the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and the Africa Rice Center. This initiative employed marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) to develop submergence-tolerant varieties integrated with high yields and preferred recurrent parents. The project deemed varieties successful only if they exhibited at least a 1-tonne per hectare yield gain under flooding stress compared to the recurrent parent, with no yield penalties under non-stress conditions. Notable varieties resulting from this project include FARO 66 and FARO 67, which have shown the ability to overcome short-term complete submergence. 1 These varieties have become popular and are widely grown in West Africa.In another study, Kawano et al. (2009) investigated a number of rice cultivars with African and Asian origins for their tolerance to 7 days of flash flooding. The conclusion was that African rice cultivars suffer from short-term complete submergence due to their elongation escape strategy, which leads to lodging and limited recovery post-desubmergence. Akinwale et al. (2012) evaluated 20 rice varieties completely submerged for two weeks and found that Sub1 mega varieties sourced from IRRI had higher survival rates and yields compared to non-Sub1 cultivars of African origin. Low survival and high yield reductions were observed for varieties with increased stem elongation, such as FARO 57 and FARO 52. Anna et al. (2019) investigated cultivar responses to flash floods at the seedling stage in Uganda, revealing that none of the cultivars possessed the Sub1A-1 allele responsible for submergence tolerance. Most of the cultivars instead had Sub1A-2. Agbeleye et al. (2019) identified TOS 6454 as the best-suited accession out of 2002 Oryza glaberrima accessions screened for flooding tolerance. Although this accession did not surpass Swarna Sub1, a tolerant check, it significantly outperformed other accessions. This highlighted that most Oryza glaberrima varieties are not suited for short-term complete submergence but are more adapted to deepwater elongation. Recently, El Dessougi et al. (2022) screened 20 rice varieties from Sudan and South Sudan, including a known tolerant check, FR13A, for flash flooding tolerance. The results indicated nearly zero survival percentages for the cultivars, except for the tolerant check, which showed a 42.5% survival rate. Hence, ongoing research efforts remain essential to address the challenges faced by numerous African countries grappling with flooding stress.The prolonged accumulation of water in lowlands, resulting in the partial submergence of rice crops, is indeed a devastating issue. This condition makes the crops susceptible to lodging, which, in turn, affects growth, yield components, and overall productivity. Although this stress is prevalent in many rice-growing regions and significantly In a study by Sakagami et al. (2009), five cultivars, namely, Banjoulou, Nylon, IR71700-247-1-1-2, IR73020-19-2-B-3-2B, and Ye'le´1A, were used to investigate their response to partial submergence for a duration of 37 days at a water depth of 35 cm. Among these cultivars, only Ye'le´ represented Oryza glaberrima, while the rest were Oryza sativa. Ye'le´ is known for its strong escape response to deepwater conditions through elongation, but interestingly, it exhibited the lowest elongation in response to stagnant flooding. Sakagami et al. (2013) reported that partially submerged rice cultivars experienced minimal growth effects compared to prolonged complete submergence. Another study by Oteyami et al. (2018) found that TOG 5810, an Oryza glaberrima variety, is well adapted to partial flooding. This cultivar displayed improvements in terms of a 1,000grain weight while maintaining fewer empty grains per panicle. Currently, stagnant flooding is a significant concern addressed by the Climate Smart African Rice Project, which aims to develop rice varieties capable of withstanding water stagnation in lowland fields. This research is crucial for finding solutions to this challenging issue and improving rice production in flood-prone areas.Prolonged flooding conditions, where rice crops are completely submerged, have devastating consequences for farmers. While this stress is most prevalent in some countries around the Niger Valley in Western Africa, total crop losses for less adapted rice varieties are a common occurrence. In some instances, water can accumulate to depths exceeding 1 meter for more than a month, hindering crop establishment and critical management practices. Interestingly, research and reports on this stress date back to the early 1900s, primarily focusing on countries such as Niger, Mali, Nigeria, Senegal, Gambia, Sierra Leone, Mauritania, and Benin (International Rice Research Institute, 1977). Local cultivars, mainly of the Oryza glaberrima species, were used by farmers but exhibited very low yields. In response to deepwater flooding, several West African countries invested in research. For example, in Mali, a number of Oryza sativa cultivars were introduced and tested in the 1960s, leading to the identification of varieties such as Malobadian, Indochina G, Nang Kiew, Khao Gaew, and Mali Sawn, which were best suited for deepwater conditions, with yields ranging from 3.7 to 4.5 t/ha, and were subsequently commercially released.In Niger, a local variety called Demba Heira with an average yield of 3.6 t/ha was successfully appreciated and cultivated in deepwater. In the 1950s, Nigeria conducted evaluations of O. glaberrima for deepwater cultivation, identifying promising cultivars such as Badane, Tatan, Don Boto, and Farin Iri. In the 1960s, varieties such as Mali Ong, Godalaki, and Indochina Blanc were added to the list following intensive testing. The introduction and evaluations of O. sativa in Guinea and Sierra Leone resulted in the release of Indochina Blanc, which has been extensively cultivated in these two countries. Futakuchi et al. (2001) studied the response of African rice to submergence tolerance over a duration of three weeks. The study revealed that O. glaberrima exhibits greater tolerance and avoidance strategies through stem elongation compared to O. sativa when subjected to prolonged complete submergence. Sakagami et al. (2009) explored the physiological differences between Asian and African rice for long-term complete submergence. Seedlings were completely submerged for 31 days with a 50 cm water depth, including IRRI Sub1 checks. All O. glaberrima cultivars survived the stress with increased shoot elongation compared to Asian rice, while all Sub1 cultivars such as FR13A failed to survive. Cultivars such as Nylon and Ye'le´1A were confirmed to be adapted to deepwater following a similar trial involving submergence for 37 days with an 80 cm water level.Furthermore, Sakagami et al. (2013) conducted another screening for complete submergence over a duration of 32 days. The findings showed an average survival rate of around 90% for African rice, while Asian rice cultivars exhibited survival rates of 40-50%. The Sub1 checks failed to survive the stress, displaying less than 5% survival. One outstanding survival case was displayed by CG14, an Oryza glaberrima cultivar., which showed 100% survival after 32 days of complete submergence and significant recovery. Strategies such as faster shoot elongation, anaerobic tillering, larger leaf area extension, higher photosynthetic rate, and the maintenance of PSII maximum efficiency are potentially used by O. glaberrima to survive prolonged deepwater conditions. Through the STASSA project, two cultivars, Kolondieba 2 and Kadia 24, were developed for lowland deepwater ecosystems. These cultivars were well distributed in Mali, covering farmers' fields prone to long-term deep flooding, and have shown the ability to survive stress with improved yields (see footnote 2).In a recent study, Luo et al. (2023) used African cultivated rice to study the mechanisms employed for survival in deepwater conditions. The findings indicated that internode elongation is highly expressed in deepwater-adapted cultivars. Additionally, genes promoting internode elongation, such as SNORKEL (SK1/SK2), SEMIDWARF1 (SD1), and ACCELERATOR OF INTERNODE ELONGATION 1 (ACE1), were characterized by increased internode elongation in the presence of SK genes. Among the allelic forms of the SK2 gene, SK2-B was found to be highly significant in strongly accelerating internode elongation during flooding. Cultivars such as CG14, C8992, RAM3, C8872, C8991, C8892, and W0844 displayed the highest internode elongation and can hence be considered useful resources for variety development.Agbeleye et al. ( 2019) highlighted WITA 4 as an outstanding variety, surpassing the known checks IRRI 119 and IRRI 154 in both survival and yields. In stagnant flooding conditions at a 50 cm water depth for three months, WITA 4 exhibited an impressive survival rate of 78%. Most notably, the variety experienced only a 4% reduction in yield compared to the control conditions. Under stress conditions, it yielded 385 g/m 2 , equivalent to 3.85 t/ha, while IRRI 119 and IRRI 154 yielded only 220 and 144 g/m 2 , respectively. Therefore, the adoption of this variety for cultivation and as a donor is of significant importance and has the potential to bring about a revolution in fields prone to stagnant flooding.Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) (2020) reported its results of the evaluation of FARO 66 and 67, which were released in Nigeria in 2017. These flood-tolerant varieties were derived from the Sub1-introgressed mega varieties WITA 4 and NERICA-L 19 through marker-assisted breeding. The average yield advantages ranged from 10 to 80 times during submergence and a 6-29% higher yield when there was no stress compared to their recurrent parents. The UNDRR (2017) highlighted that FARO 66 was superior to its recurrent parent WITA 4 (FARO 52); hence, under submergence, it yielded 80 times, and under non-submergence, it had a yield gain of 6-11%. FARO 67 yielded 10 times under submergence, while under non-submergence, it had a 10-29% yield advantage compared to its recurrent parent NERICA-L19 (FARO 60).Another study by Ulzen et al. (2022) compared the performance of improved varieties to lowland ecology, among which FARO 66 and 67 were included. The farmers selected FARO 66 as their preferred variety over the others due to its high yield and large panicles. The comparison of varietal resilience to submergence when wet seeded or transplanted using FARO 66, FARO 67, and a local check WITA 9 in Cote d′Ivoire indicated that the yields of two submergence varieties (FARO 66 and FARO 67) are not affected by either the growing season or crop establishment method unlike the local check (Devkota et al., 2022). The yields of the submergence tolerant varieties, regardless of the growing season and establishment method, were 1.1-4.5 t/ha higher than those of WITA 9. FARO 66 and FARO 67 were declared among the Sub1 climate-resilient variety with a yield advantage of 1-3 t/ha over the original varieties (CGIAR, 2021). Therefore, with such yield advantages, farmers adopting these varieties are more likely to be successful and overcome food scarcity during harsh weather.Numerous studies conducted in Asia have provided valuable insights into the mechanisms of stress tolerance in rice and the subsequent development of tolerant rice varieties. This wealth of research has made Asia a prime example from which valuable lessons can be drawn regarding how farmers have benefited from the adoption of stress-tolerant rice varieties. These studies have demonstrated the positive impact of utilizing such varieties. Mondal et al. (2020) conducted an evaluation of 10 cultivars for anaerobic germination. These cultivars were subjected to dry direct seeding, and seeds were submerged with a water depth of 3-5 cm for 21 days. Their findings revealed that the popular varieties with anaerobic germination QTLs AG1 and AG2 demonstrated a significantly higher yield of 2.8 t/ha compared to their counterparts lacking these QTLs. Furthermore, the varieties introgressed with AG QTLs exhibited a greater number of tillers, indicating their potential for improved rice production.Similarly, Mackill et al. (2012) reported the results of multisite evaluations of Sub1 varieties paired with their non-Sub1 counterparts. These evaluations involved subjecting the rice to complete submergence for more than 5 days. Notably, Swarna Sub1 and Samba Mahsuri Sub1 yielded 3.67 and 3.8 t/ha, respectively, in contrast to their non-Sub1 counterparts, which yielded 2.34 and 2.1 t/ha. The Sub1 varieties exhibited yields that were twice as high during extended periods of submergence compared to the non-Sub1 varieties. Furthermore, submergence-tolerant cultivars exhibited characteristics such as greater chlorophyll retention and improved seedling recovery.Moreover, farmers in countries such as India, Bangladesh, Nepal, the Philippines, and Myanmar have adopted Sub1 rice varieties. These include popular varieties such as Swarna Sub1, IR64 Sub1, BR11 Sub1, and Samba Mahsuri Sub1. The farmers assessed various traits, including survival, recovery, tillering, plant height, panicle length, grain color, length, and quality, post-harvest qualities, and overall yields. The Sub1 varieties consistently outperformed locally used cultivars in the criteria assessed by the farmers. This not only contributed to improved overall productivity but also had a positive impact on food availability and living standards.This review has examined the progress in Africa's development of flood-tolerant rice varieties. While some strides have been made, the region's achievements remain limited, underscoring the critical importance of flood-tolerant rice varieties for improving productivity and ensuring food security. The scattered nature of information on developing flood-tolerant rice varieties highlights the need for effective coordination and thorough documentation. Despite the limited number of flood stress-tolerant varieties currently available in the region, it is imperative to ensure their widespread dissemination in flood-prone rice cultivation areas. This requires studying farmers' perceptions, adoption rates, and the performance of these varieties as data on these aspects are scarce. Such studies can provide valuable insights into crop survival, quality, and overall performance, potentially leading to significant improvements in farmers' harvests and food availability. Nonetheless, it is essential to recognize that further efforts are still needed in the identification and development of flood stress-tolerant varieties, given the alarming intensity and frequency of floods in Africa. Furthermore, there is also a crucial need for the development of rice varieties that can withstand multiple types of flooding. Currently, no such varieties are available, even though the same ecological regions can experience diverse types of flooding. Therefore, the future success of Africa's rice sector hinges on dedicated and productive research efforts, coupled with effective dissemination and adoption strategies."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3183627989.json b/main/part_2/3183627989.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..052da7e7ceeb520300a0f0978f3ec138c1834699 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3183627989.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"15d758afcd69657e475484dfdcbe4786","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/bc2326de-a4cc-4180-bd09-5fda335c3e42/retrieve","id":"-819397899"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c9a190d3-9516-4e5e-8744-84214fe76d55","content":"Palabras clave: Fungicidas, Tizón tardío. Área temática: Protección vegetal. Presentación oral.El principal problema fitosanitario del cultivo de papa en Ecuador es el tizón tardío (Phytophthora infestans). Factores como su alta incidencia (que puede ser constante por las siembras escalonadas y clima favorable), su efecto devastador y la susceptibilidad de la mayoría de variedades (nativas y mejoradas) profundizan esta problemática. La aplicación de fungicidas continúa siendo la práctica más extendida entre los productores que buscan minimizar los daños (Kromann et al., 2014). Los productores aplican fungicidas un promedio de siete veces y mezclando un promedio de 2.5 productos por aplicación (Kromann et al., 2011). La importancia global del tizón tardío de la papa es un fuerte incentivo para que la industria de agroquímicos busque nuevas moléculas para su control, así la red Euroblight menciona que el tizón tardío se combate en Europa mediante la utilización de 20 formulaciones que incluyen 15 ingredientes activos (Kromann et al., 2014). En Ecuador ocurre lo contrario porque se utilizaron solo ocho formulaciones que involucran siete ingredientes activos, que abarcan casi la totalidad de fungicidas usados para manejar el tizón tardío una década atrás (Ortiz et al., 2002;Kromann et al., 2011), un escenario que no ha cambiado considerablemente según nuestras estimaciones. El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar la eficiencia de moléculas nuevas (introducidas los últimos años) para el control del tizón tardío y la adaptación de un protocolo utilizado por Euroblight a las condiciones locales.Se revisaron los fungicidas registrados para el control del tizón tardío de la papa en AGROCALIDAD. Se adquirieron los productos y se solicitó información de la dosis recomendada y correcta aplicación a las empresas dueñas del registro. Se instaló un experimento en el lote C1 de la Est. Exp. Quito del CIP (3050 msnm), los tratamientos (7 fungicidas y un testigo sin aplicación) se dispusieron en un diseño de bloques completamente aleatorizados con 4 repeticiones. Cada unidad experimental de 24.75 m 2 se conformó de 5 surcos (4.5 x 1.1 m) en los que se sembraron 75 tubérculos a 30 cm de distancia. Se utilizó semilla seleccionada de la var. Uvilla con susceptibilidad a P. infestans de 8 (altamente susceptible). Se sembraron cortinas de avena (1 m) al contorno de las parcelas para reducir el efecto de deriva de fungicidas y la influencia del inóculo de una parcela a otra. Los fungicidas se aplicaron con sus dosis recomendadas más altas (sin adherente) utilizando 4 bombas de mochila CP-3 (20 L de capacidad, presión de descarga 43.5 lb/pulg 2 , boquilla de cono hueco 1.2 mm Ø, volumen descargado 2.5 L min -1 ). La aplicación de fungicidas inició de forma preventiva al 80% de emergencia (30 días después de la siembra aprox.). Las bombas se lavaron con abundante agua (desmontando la lanza) por tres ocasiones antes de cambiar de fungicida. Un solo operario aplicó el mismo fungicida a lo largo del cultivo con intervalos fijos de ocho días hasta que empezó la senescencia. El manejo agronómico, en lo que se refiere a preparación del suelo, fertilización, siembra, aporque y control de plagas y enfermedades (con excepción del tizón) se hizo con base en las recomendaciones técnicas. Se evaluó la severidad (lecturas semanales del área foliar con lesiones, y se calculó el área bajo la curva de progreso de la enfermedad relativo -ABDPER) y el rendimiento (t ha -1 ). Se realizaron análisis de varianza y comparación de promedios para evaluar los tratamientos.Las curvas de desarrollo de la epidemia identificaron tres grupos de fungicidas: aquellos sin ninguna eficiencia (curva similar al testigo sin aplicación); dos fungicidas con cierto nivel de control hasta los dos meses cuya eficiencia decrece paulatinamente conforme avanza el cultivo y un grupo de cuatro fungicidas muy eficientes que mantienen la epidemia en niveles muy bajos hasta un mes antes de la cosecha. La prueba de Tukey (p ≤ 0.05) discrimina los fungicidas en grupos distintos agrupando a 4 de ellos en el nivel más alto de eficiencia para el control de la enfermedad (Tabla ). El fosfito de K (K3PO3) no ofreció ningún tipo de control, aunque en investigaciones previas tuvo excelentes resultados. Los fungicidas cyazofamid, fenamidone + propamocarb, ametoctradina + dimetomorph y fluopicolide + propamocarb mostraron una alta eficiencia para controlar el tizón tardío de la papa en una variedad susceptible. El producto más usado en Ecuador (mancozeb + cimoxanil) que fue el testigo, presenta menor eficiencia que los fungicidas mencionados. Es necesario esclarecer que influyó en el nulo desempeño del fosfito de K. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3184756991.json b/main/part_2/3184756991.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1c562f73ab5e7a78aca08ee065a0bd86cfbcabc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3184756991.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2cfb85c31c377e51b52077652f36ac64","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a5447f98-0c57-411d-b30b-a5c7ba5564c7/retrieve","id":"-1894006868"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"34ee5bfc-fa50-4458-a0e9-528193dca779","content":"For the East African Community (EAC), IITA prepared 11 Technical Papers (TPs) on key sectoral issues impacted by aflatoxins. All available evidence of each sector was comprehensively reviewed, and action plans recommended to manage the impacts. Establishment and sharing of this knowledge base laid the foundation for policies to address the aflatoxin-related food safety issues. The TPs guided the EAC secretariat to prepare nine policy briefs that were endorsed by the EAC Council of Ministers and publicly released.The development community is realizing there is no food security without food safety. Aflatoxin contamination is one of the most well-known food safety concerns in Africa. The occurrence of aflatoxins is pervasive in several staple and export crops, which form the agricultural economic and food security backbone of East African Community (EAC) member states. As a result, human exposure to aflatoxin in the EAC is high. Aflatoxins also impact production of livestock through ingestion of contaminated feed. Several African governments have imposed regulations to limit human and animal exposure to aflatoxins.In 2013, IITA, in partnership with EAC and funding from the US Agency for International Development (USAID), began the Aflatoxin Policy and Program for East Africa (APPEAR) project. In the context of the EAC aflatoxin program, the Ministers of Health, Agriculture and Trade, their deputies, and other principals in the public and private sector are brought together to review technical materials, conduct deliberations and then formulate and disseminate policy recommendations. These recommendations are subsequently carried back to the member states for implementation. The objective of the APPEAR project was to develop Technical Papers (TPs) to lay the foundation for the development of policy briefs.The following 11 TPs, each prepared by a team of international and national experts and vetted by member states, were submitted to the EAC secretariat and USAID: The EAC Multi-sectoral Ministerial Council adopted all policy recommendations included in the 11 TPs. Subsequently, the EAC secretariat prepared nine policy briefs that were guided by the recommendations in the TPs. The 36th Meeting of the Council of Ministers in February 2018 endorsed the policy briefs and directed partner states to mainstream the EAC Aflatoxin Prevention and Control Strategy priorities in their national budgets and national agriculture investment plans. The policy briefs were publicly released during a high-level event on 16-17 August 2018 in Nairobi. One of the EAC member states is already following the recommendations in the policy brief on alternate use and disposal systems.• https://tinyurl.com/y9lgv6ph The development community is realizing there is no food security without food safety. Aflatoxin contamination is one of the most well-known food safety concerns in Africa. The occurrence of aflatoxins is pervasive in several staple and export crops, which form the agricultural economic and food security backbone of East African Community (EAC) member states. As a result, human exposure to aflatoxin in the EAC is high. Aflatoxins also impact production of livestock through ingestion of contaminated feed. Several African governments have imposed regulations to limit human and animal exposure to aflatoxins.In 2013, IITA, in partnership with EAC and funding from the US Agency for International Development (USAID), began the Aflatoxin Policy and Program for East Africa (APPEAR) project. In the context of the EAC aflatoxin program, the Ministers of Health, Agriculture and Trade, their deputies, and other principals in the public and private sector are brought together to review technical materials, conduct deliberations and then formulate and disseminate policy recommendations. These recommendations are subsequently carried back to the member states for implementation. The objective of the APPEAR project was to develop Technical Papers (TPs) to lay the foundation for the development of policy briefs.The following 11 TPs, each prepared by a team of international and national experts and vetted by member states, were submitted to the EAC secretariat and USAID: "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3189397552.json b/main/part_2/3189397552.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90748db35dceed5e80245778f3ec63db2b097edf --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3189397552.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c752eab0435cdf558529e261c4e5a845","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c2205742-c1c0-4856-b210-25d11ce6a97b/retrieve","id":"-642385119"},"keywords":["Hordeum vulgare L.","chlorophyll fluorescence","photosystem II photochemistry","quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs)","Mixed linear model (MLM)","Abscisic acid (ABA) signaling","protein kinase","post-transcription modification"],"sieverID":"d54b0b0b-a83e-4565-b6fd-d6ea4593634b","content":"Low-temperature stress (LTS) is among the major abiotic stresses affecting the geographical distribution and productivity of the most important crops. Understanding the genetic basis of photosynthetic variation under cold stress is necessary for developing more climate-resilient barley cultivars. To that end, we investigated the ability of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (F V F M, and F V F 0 ) to respond to changes in the maximum quantum yield of Photosystem II photochemistry as an indicator of photosynthetic energy. A panel of 96 barley spring cultivars from different breeding zones of Canada was evaluated for chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits under cold acclimation and freeze shock stresses at different times. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed using a mixed linear model (MLM). We identified three major and putative genomic regions harboring 52 significant quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) on chromosomes 1H, 3H, and 6H for low-temperature tolerance. Functional annotation indicated several QTNs were either within the known or close to genes that play important roles in the photosynthetic metabolites such as abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, hydrolase activity, protein kinase, and transduction of environmental signal transduction at the posttranslational modification levels. These outcomes revealed that barley plants modified their gene expression profile in response to decreasing temperatures resulting in physiological and biochemical modifications. ColdFrontiers in Plant Science frontiersin.org 01Environmental factors, particularly those affecting temperature and availability of water are the main factors of in plant growth and development. The low-temperature polar regions and Oceans cover about 80% of the Globe's land. One-third only of the global lands are free of ice, and 42% of this area is commonly under temperatures below -20°C (Junttila and Robberecht, 1999). In such regions, plants require specific processes to survive exposure to low temperatures. Most plants have developed a degree of cold tolerance, which is usually based on a combination of the length of exposure to cold stress and the minimum temperature experienced (Janska et al., 2010). Therefore, the growth and development of plants are affected by temperature variations in the majority of temperate regions on Earth (Nilsen et al., 1996). The problem is expected to expand due to climatic changes, particularly in Northern Europe and Canada. Cold stress impacts plant growth and crop productivity, causing substantial yield reductions (Junttila and Robberecht, 1999). Plants vary in their responses to freezing (<0°C) and chilling (0-15°C) temperatures (Browse and Xin, 2001). Damage appears when low temperatures overlap with sensitive stages of plant growth.In barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), yield and grain quality are the key challenges in maintaining the constant growth of the agriculture industry. Though significant advances have been made in the genetic gains for yield and grain quality in barley, the crop rarely reaches its full yield potential because of seasonal variations including the low temperatures prevailing early and late in the growing season. Barley is mainly classified into three types of growth habits: spring, winter, and facultative. Winter barley is sown in the autumn because it requires a cold period (vernalization) to flower. Facultative types do not require vernalization, some lines possess levels of low-temperature tolerance comparable to winter barley. While, spring barleys are sown in the spring and do not require vernalization, and possess no perceivable level of low-temperature tolerance (Rizza et al., 2011;Zitzewitz et al., 2011). Spring barley is a main crop across the Canadian prairies and is used for food, malting, and general purposes (feed and forage). Spring barley yields about 20% less than winter barley, in areas where it is adapted (Kling et al., 2004). Though, spring barley genotypes are normally not as tolerant to cold as other winter cereals. Cold tolerance in barley has been a challenging phenomenon to develop with conventional breeding approaches. It is best to evaluate and screen breeding material under uniform cold stress in the laboratory as screening for winterhardiness in the field is rarely reliable. In 2021, barleyseeded areas consisted of 50.4% malting barley, 42.3% general purpose barley, and 2.3% food barley in the western Canada (Marta and Tricia, 2020). In poorer countries, barley is an essential food source (Grando and Macpherson, 2005), affording harvestable yields in locations that are harsh and marginal for crop production. Current research has categorized barley as a true functional food in more developed societies. The barley's grain is particularly high in soluble dietary fiber, which significantly declines the risk of serious diseases such as type II diabetes. The USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved cell-wall polysaccharides from barley grain as a human health claim (Collins et al., 2010).Selection for cold tolerance/susceptibility in barley varieties can be associated with reliable screening techniques. Traditional methods, such as measuring survival rates and plant re-growth, are time-consuming and inaccurate in quantifying the level of cold tolerance (Novillo et al., 2004). Some techniques focus on injuries to the plasma membranes that result in the leakage of electrolytes from plant tissues (Steponkus et al., 1990). The electrolyte leakage is easily quantified by conductivity measurements (Rohde et al., 2004). For such investigations, plants are exposed to freeze-thaw cycles with minimum temperatures usually ranging from -1 to -50°C, and electrolyte leakage caused by cooling is then measured. The methods to quantify the cold tolerance of plants should be noninvasive and applicable at a high-throughput screening rate so that the underlying genetic determinations can be effectively quantified and established (Mishra et al., 2011). Evidence suggests that chlorophyll fluorescence emission can be used effectively in highthroughput screening of plants' low-temperature tolerance (Mishra et al., 2011).Photosynthesis is one of the most essential and complex physiological mechanisms in all plants and is influenced in all periods by stresses (Baker, 1996). Because the photosynthesis mechanism regulates multiple cellular processes, including photosystems and photosynthetic pigments, electron transport system, and CO 2 reduction events, any stress-induced damage can completely decrease the photosynthetic capacity of green plants (Lawlor and Cornic, 2002;Ashraf and Harris, 2013). Cold stress influences the photosynthetic apparatus through the suppression of photosystems and pigment modifications, thylakoid membranes, photosynthesis-related enzyme activity, chlorophyll fluorescence, gas exchange, and reduced CO 2 assimilation in addition to the electron transport rate. Photosynthesis converts light energy into redox equivalents (NADPH) and ATP, essential elements for plant growth and development. On the other hand, cold stress prevents thylakoid electron transport via aggregate membrane viscosity. It disorders light energy process trapping by Photosystem I and Photosystem II antenna. The enhancement of energy trapping beyond its regular ability results in a high-energy state, which eventually leads to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Ashraf and Harris, 2013).Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters have become a common and powerful technique in plant breeding to investigate the impact of stresses on the photosynthetic mechanism (Guidi et al., 2019). It can be used as a representative of plant stress as environmental stresses, such as extremes of temperature, water, and light availability can decrease the capability of a plant to metabolize normally. This can lead to an imbalance between the light energy absorption via chlorophyll and the utilization of energy in photosynthesis (Schreiber, 1986;Schreiber et al., 1986). Chlorophyll fluorescence is an indicator of photosynthetic energy that responds to alterations in Photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry and consequently represents a rapid and efficient tool to assess the capacity of the photosynthetic mechanism at low temperatures (Lichtenthaler and Rinderle, 1988). The function of the photosynthetic machinery can be evaluated by measuring the ratio of chlorophyll variable fluorescence (F V ) over the maximum fluorescence value (F M ), which reveals the efficiency of the excitation capture by open photosystem II reaction centers (Fracheboud et al., 1999;Rizza et al., 2001). An association between the decrease of F V /F M and frost tolerance during hardening and after freezing was found in winter wheat (Clement and Hasselt, 1996), spring and winter barleys, and rye (Smillie and Hetherington, 1983).During cold acclimation, different physiological and biochemical modifications occur, such as the synthesizing of proline, soluble sugars, and cold-resistance proteins to maintain proteins (Hannah et al., 2010). These events play significant roles in the response to cold stress by controlling the ice crystal formation, osmotic potential, reactive oxygen species, and stability of cell walls and membranes (Ding et al., 2019). Some elements, including protein kinases, messenger molecules, phosphatases, and transcription factors (TFs), have been reported for cold-stress signaling pathways (Ding et al., 2019). Understanding the genetic regulation underlying the photosynthesis process under low-temperature stress in barley can facilitate the development of climate-resilient and high-yielding cultivars in a short period of time. Since the first draft reference of the barley genome was released (Schulte et al., 2009;IBGS et al., 2012), high-quality genome sequences have been published (Sato et al., 2016;Mascher et al., 2017;Dai et al., 2018). These tools facilitated barley research and became precious resources for the improvement and comparative genomics studies including genomewide association studies (GWAS) and QTL mapping. In addition, advances in genome mapping and sequencing technologies have made possible the cost-effective assembly and sequencing of hundreds of genotypes with large-genome species, such as barley (5 Gb, haploid genome size) (Monat et al., 2019;Jayakodi et al., 2020). The 9K SNP array is a commonly powerful GWAS tool for identifying specific allele variants (Comadran et al., 2012).Evidence of chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis variability in barley has been reported (Kocheva et al., 2004;Guo et al., 2007;Bertholdsson et al., 2015), indicating opportunities for genetic improvement and selection. Several analyses have been reported for quantitative trait loci (QTL) for chlorophyll fluorescence under low oxygen concentration (Bertholdsson et al., 2015), post-flowering under drought (Guo et al., 2007), early shorttime drought tolerance (Wojcik-Jagla et al., 2013). Understanding the mechanisms of low-temperature tolerance and barley productivity is one of the main challenges facing scientists and breeders today. So far, the effect of low temperatures on chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of photosynthetic energy conversion in barley plants is still well unknown. Therefore, the aims of the present study were (i) to investigate the response of barley genotypes at three-to four-leaf stages to low-temperature stress including cold acclimation and freezing shock; (ii) to identify genetic loci associated with the chlorophyll fluorescence trait, by using genome-wide association studies; (iii) to identify key genes related to chlorophyll fluorescence before and after the LTS conditions and, (iv) introgression of cold tolerance into spring barley.A panel of 96 spring barley genotypes from eight breeding programs of Western Canadian barley breeding programs was used in this study. All genotypes were evaluated at different times between 1994 and 2006 (Beattie et al., 2010) and selected based on their high seed yield and percentage of winter survival and cold hardiness (ranging from 50 to 100%). The association panel consists of advanced breeding lines, commercial varieties, two-rowed lines used to investigate beta-glucanase and limit dextrinase, and elite germplasm, which has been developed for the Western Two-Row Cooperative Registration. Several diversity array technology (DArT) markers were detected for grain quality using 91 genotypes of this panel and disease ratings for true loose smut and net blotch (Beattie et al., 2010). In our previous study, an important pattern of genetic diversity was detected in the population studied. Our previous study revealed that this panel is differentiated due to the ear-row type and breeding program origins into five subpopulations (Capo-Chichi et al., 2023).Two experiments namely cold acclimation and freezing shock evaluations were conducted to study the impact of the low-temperature stress (LTS) on the 96 spring barley genotypes. In both experiments, ten seeds of each genotype were germinated in 8 cm×8 cm×7 cm pots containing pasteurized field soil (wet soil) in the growth chamber. The seeds in each pot were covered by an equal amount of soil to enhance uniform emergence. Pots were placed in a growth chamber at 20°C/15°C and a photoperiod of 12/12 h light/ dark cycle. The experiments were designed in a completely randomized design (CRD) in three replicates. At the three-leaf seedling stage (on day 14), the germination rate was recorded for all genotypes then, seedlings were thinned to five plants per pot before the treatments.For cold acclimation treatment, seedlings at a three-leaf stage were placed in a programmable cold chamber. The initial temperature in the cold chamber was -1°C. The temperature was raised between 3°C and 5°C, then gradually decreased to -12°C over a duration of four hours (Supplementary Figure 1), to ensure that nucleation occurred evenly. For the freezing-shock treatment; pots were moved during the day from the growth chamber to a programmable cold chamber. The initial temperature was -18°C and the temperature was immediately raised to -6°C. Pots were exposed to temperatures that gradually declined from -6°C to -11°C for 75 min (0.06°C per min) (Supplementary Figure 1). In order to record chlorophyll fluorescence parameters for the same seedlings each time, the measured seedlings were numbered from 1 to 5 in both experiments. After the treatments, all seedlings were returned to the growth chambers (normal condition). A week later, a frost's survival rate in each pot was recorded and the genotypes were characterized according to their ability to tolerate the low temperatures. Frost survival was calculated visually twice; once after the acclimation using a 1-5 symptoms scale, where: 1 (dead plant), 2 (trace of life; low survival potential), 3 (intensive damage; less than half of the coleoptile leaf green), 4 (moderate to minimal damage; limited to leaf edges), 5 (no damage).The fluorescence measurement values were collected from 96 genotypes after cold acclimation treatment, while after the freezingshock treatment 22 genotypes died out completely, and the results were collected from the remaining 74 genotypes. The measurements were assessed in the greenhouse on the second leaf that completely expanded. A grid with a 33 mm hole diameter was clipped on the inner section of the leaf. For a dark-adapted period, the leaf clips were left for 20 min. The measurement probe was trimmed later and the reading values were taken by using a portable chlorometer OS-30P (Opti-Sciences). Plants were allowed to dark-adapt overnight to ensure that all PSII centers are open, and the lights were turned off in the greenhouse until measurements were concluded (between 1 and 3 a.m.). The chlorophyll fluorescence parameter was measured according to the formula; (Ghassemi-Golezani et al., 2008).Where; F 0 ; F M and F V are primary fluorescence parameters while F V /F M and F V /F 0 are fluorescence ratios as the following.F 0 : minimum fluorescence occurs while all antenna sites are supposed to be open (dark-adapted). F M : maximum fluorescence intensity under exposure to the excitation source while all antenna sites are assumed to be closed. F V : variable fluorescence. F V /F M : the maximum yield of primary photochemistry. F V /F 0 : maximum efficiency of PSII. The F V /F M is the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximal fluorescence, which is an indicator of maximum quantum efficiency and gives important information concerning the effect of environmental stress on the plant. The F V /F 0 ratio is a very sensitive indicator of the maximum efficiency of photochemical processes in PSII and/or the potential photosynthetic activity of healthy and stressed plants (Lichtenthaler & Rinderle, 1988). Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were recorded at three different times for both experiments: before the treatment (BF), two hours after the treatment (AF), and 24 hours after the treatment (DF). Heritability in the broad sense (H b ) was calculated before and after the treatments according to Elakhdar et al. (Elakhdar et al., 2016).Heritability in the broad sense; H 2 b = V 2 G =V 2 P  100 , where, V G ; genetic variance and V P ; phenotypic varianceGenomic DNA was isolated from the young leaf of the 3-4 leaf stage using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA quality was quantified at 230 nm and then qualified at 230/ 260 and 260/280 absorption ratios, respectively. Genotypes were genotyped on an Illumina 9K Barley Infinium iSelect SNP assay (Comadran et al., 2012) at the USDA-ARS genotyping laboratory (Fargo, ND). Physical positions of markers were taken from the barley pseudomolecule assembly by the James Hutton iSelect annotation (https://ics.hutton.ac.uk/50k/) and Barley DB: Barley Bioresources Database (http://earth.nig.ac.jp/~dclust/cgi-bin/ index.cgi?lang=en). SNPs with unknown chromosomal position, monomorphism, and SNPs with missing values greater than 20% were eliminated. For association analysis, markers with genetic and physical positions and with minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.05 or greater were used. After performing these filters, a total of 5063 high-quality SNP markers remained in the dataset and were used for subsequent GWAS.Using the 5063 informative SNPs marker, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed on 96 barley genotypes to identify genetic regions linked to photosynthesis after the cold. GWAS was performed using a mixed linear model (MLM) (Zhang et al., 2005), using the R package GAPIT (Lipka et al., 2012). The MLM model was selected due to its strength and power for detecting marker/trait associations. This model is based on the genotype data (G), population structure (Q) as fixed effects, and the Kinship-matrix (K) as random effects (Pasam et al., 2012). In our previous study, Genome-wide LD decay was plotted as R 2 of an SNP marker against the corresponding genetic distance using the mixedmodel method (Capo-Chichi et al., 2023). A strong LD with an approximate average value of 0.021 when the distance was 0.391 cM was observed among the 5063 marker pairs in the studied population. The kinship matrix was assessed using the whole set of markers. To identify significant quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs), the Bonferroni corrected significance threshold was determined, based on the reduced marker set of 5063 SNP and a significant level of p<0.001 with a corresponding threshold of (-log10 p ≥ 3). Manhattan plots mapped the chromosome position on the x-axis against-log 10 (P-value) on the y-axis of each marker. The quantile-quantile (QQ) was plotted between the observed and the expected -log 10 P values.Genes with significant markers associated with the chlorophyll fluorescence, their locations, and corresponding annotations were retrieved from the BARLEYMAP platform (http://floresta.eead. csic.es/barleymap/) (Cantalapiedra et al., 2015) version of the MorexV3 genome (Comadran et al., 2012). The physical positions of markers were revealed from the Barley Physical Map IBSC (IBGS et al., 2012), the POPSEQ map (Mascher et al., 2013), and the Morex Genome Map (Mascher et al., 2017). Gene Ontologies (GO) enrichments were obtained from the Amigo of Gene Ontology platform (http://geneontology.org) (Pomaznoy et al., 2018) and the Gene Ontology and GO annotation platform; QuickGO (https:// www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/). Gene co-expression for the identified genes was revealed from the Global gene co-expression networks (GCNs) database PlantNexus (Zhou et al., 2022).Four two-rowed winter barleys '02Ab671', '02Ab431', '02Ab669' and '2Ab08X05W061-208' were obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The genotypes were selected based on excellent malt extract, high seed yield, and their high percentage of cold hardiness and winter survival (50 to 100% across different locations in the northern United States). Vernalization was performed in growth chambers at 5°C for 8 h of light for seedlings at the two-to-three-leaf stage. After ten weeks of vernalization, seedlings were moved to 20°C with 16/8 h light/dark, and humidity closely monitored. Upon flowering, eighteen crosses were made between spring and winter barleys (Supplemental Table 1).Twenty-nine-day-old plants from 96 spring barley genotypes were used to study the impact of low-temperature stress: cold acclimation and freezing shock. The survival rates were assessed using a visual damage scale. In the cold acclimation and freeze shock experiments, the frequency of the genotypes, and distribution to germination were recorded for all genotypes (Figure 1). The results revealed that the time required for the emergence onset varied from 14 to 19 days for the genotypes studied (Figure 1). At 14 days, the emergence rates ranged from 0 to 38%, while on day 19, the emergence rates varied from 4 to 100%. The time required for 50% emergence ranged from 15 to 22 days, demonstrating that some genotypes have the ability to emerge faster than others. We observed several lines that exhibited adequate performance at 5°C.Under cold acclimation, we observed that survival frequencies ranged from 30 to 100% with the majority grouped between 80 and 90% (Figure 2). Under freezing-shock stress, 22 genotypes were dead while survival rates ranged from 0 to 100% with the majority of the genotypes between 20 and 30% survival (Figure 2). The The emergence percentage (G%) of the first, 50% (T50) and greater than 90% (T>90) emergence of 96 spring barley genotypes. G% was calculated by dividing the number of emerged seedlings by the number of seeds planted for each seed plot and multiplying the product by 100.seedlings stressed under these conditions suffered leaf wilting as the duration of stress was prolonged. These findings suggest that the cold acclimation treatment improved freezing tolerance more than the freezing shock treatment.Five chlorophyll characteristics including parameters of transient fluorescence were collected for cold acclimation and freezing shock treatments. The parameters represent the photochemical efficiency of PSII behavior affected by LTS (Table 1). A high level of phenotypic variation was detected in all traits measured under both low-temperature stress conditions (Table 1). Before the treatments (BF), the highest H b value was observed for F V /F 0 (97.9% and 93.6% for cold acclimation and freezing shock treatments, respectively) (Table 1). Low to high values of heritability (H b ) were observed under LTS treatments. Two hours after treatments (AF), F V /F 0 exhibited also the highest value of heritability H b of 94.4% and 96.5%, cold acclimation and freezing shock, respectively, whereas, after 24 hours of stress (DF), F V /F 0 and F M had the highest values 92.2% and 73.5, respectively) (Table 1). These results suggest adequate variability and different responses to low-temperature stress that exists in the barley material studied. Normal distribution was detected for the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, F V /F 0 and F V /F M , before and after the low-temperature conditions (Figure 3). This indicates that barley's chlorophyll fluorescence traits are quantitatively inherited and controlled by multiple genes. In addition, the genotypes might vary in their photosynthetic mechanisms in response to lowtemperature tolerance, which will impact the yield and ultimately the breeder. Thus, the difference in low-temperature tolerance between the genotypes provides a foundation for studying this phenomenon for GWAS and/or QTL studies.Before the cold acclimation treatment (BF), the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximal fluorescence (F V /F M ) values for lines ranged from 0.746 to 0.775, with a mean value of 0.76 (Table 1). The variable fluorescence to fluorescence occurring while antenna sites are supposed to be open (F V /F 0 ) ranged from 2.943 to 3.453 with an average value of 3.22 (Table 1). After the exposure to lowtemperature stress, the mean values of F V /F M and F V /F 0 decreased significantly in both experiments compared with those before the treatment (Table 1). Two hours after cold acclimation stress (AF)Survival rates distribution for 96 genotypes of spring barley one week old after low-temperature stress conditions. Cold acclimation (left) and freezing shock (right). View for the effect of freezing-shock treatment on the spring barley at the three-leaf stage (lower panel). Twenty-two genotypes died out completely. Low-temperature stress is induced at the three-leaf stage.treatment, the F V /F M values measured ranged from 0.062 to 0.667 with an average of 0.39 across the genotypes. The F V /F 0 values ranged from 0.067 to 2.513, averaging 1.28. While the F V /F M values after 24 hours of cold acclimation treatment (DH) varied from 0.714 to 0.001, averaging 0.38 (Table 1). The F V /F 0 values ranged from 0.001 to 2.62, averaging 1.33 (Table 1). After the freezingshock treatment, 22 genotypes died out completely (Figure 2). F V F M values for genotypes ranged from 0.10 to 0.55 and 0.00 to 0.61 for AF and DH, respectively (Table 1). While the values measured for F V /F 0 varied from 0.12 to 2.00, and from 0.00 to 2.15 for AF and DH, respectively (Table 1). The remaining 74 genotypes were used for the GWAS.The result suggested that freezing-shock treatment caused a large decline in F V /F M and F V /F 0 values in the non-hardy cultivars. During the recovery in the growth chambers, we found that this effect was irreversible and contingent on a threshold. In most cases, the irreversible effect was associated with F V /F M values below 0.220. For more hardy cultivars, the F V /F M values varied between 0.477 and 0.609 after freezing shock treatment, while the F V /F 0 ranged from 1.832 to 2.413. Taken together, these results show that the decreases in the chlorophyll fluorescence indexes might reveal a reduction of PSII efficiency and plant death.The comprehensive Pearson correlation analysis between the chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits; F 0 , F V , F M , F V /F 0, and F V /F M under low-temperature tolerance before (BF), two hours after (AF), and 24 hours after (DH) treatment are presented in histograms (Figure 4). For the AF readings, correlations between the parameters measured ranged from 0.628 between F 0 and F V /F 0 to 0.992 between F V and F M at p = 0.0001. Meanwhile, a higher correlation (p = 0.0001) was observed under the DH stress condition between F V and F M , which ranged from 0.691 between F O and F V /F M to 0.994 between F V and F M at p = 0.0001 (Figure 4A). A correlation analysis was also performed between the traits under freezing shock stress (Figure 4B). The correlations were moderate to high and ranged from 0.458 between F M and F 0 to 0.968 between F M and F V under the AF stress condition (Figure 4 B). Under the DH condition, a positive correlation was detected between F V /F 0 and F V /F M with all studied traits and ranged from 0.755 to 0.967 when p = 0.0001, respectively (Figure 4B).To investigate the genetic factors associated with lowtemperature tolerance in barley, a GWAS analysis was conducted for the chlorophyll fluorescence related-traits from 96 spring barley genotypes with a set of 5063 high-quality SNP markers. The average r 2 value of the genome was 0.02, and the LD decay was found to start at an r 2 value of 0.38 and reached half-decay at 0.2, representing the genome's threshold distance for linkage analysis (Capo-Chichi et al., 2023). In total, 52 significant quantitative trait Maximum fluorescence when all PSII are closed, F V /F M ; the ratio of photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII), F V /F 0 ; the ratio of maximum efficiency of photochemical processes in PSII of healthy and stressed plants.nucleotides (QTNs) were detected. Two significant SNPs (P< 0.001) were associated with chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits before low-temperature treatments, and 50 significant SNPs were observed under cold acclimation stress conditions (Table 2, Figure 5). All significant associations were found on chromosomes 1H, 3H, and 6H. While, under freezing-shock treatment, the remaining 74 cultivars used for the GWAS, the fluorescence data showed no significant associations between SNPs and chlorophyll fluorescence traits. Perhaps, this may be because of genetic drift, in which some versions of a gene have been lost because of random chance in this small population. Additionally, genetic diversity degrades more quickly in small populations than in large populations due to stochastic sampling error (genetic drift).Before the low-temperature stress treatment, one significant MTA was identified for F M and F V , which is located on chromosome 1H (42.035-42.036 cM) (Table 2). The peak marker was SCRI.RS.152795 with likelihood ratio-based R 2 of 1.22 and explained 67.612 and 52.574% of the additive variances for F M and F V , respectively. The Manhattan and Q-Q plot for both F M and F V are shown in Figures 5A, B, respectively .For the AF measurements under stress conditions, 39 significant QTNs were detected, three QTNs for F M , ten QTNs for F V , nine QTNs for F V F M, and twenty for F V F 0 (Table 2). Several QTNs were denoted in multiple chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits under both BF and/or AF conditions (Figure 6). There were reasonable correlations detected between chlorophyll fluorescence- Frontiers in Plant Science frontiersin.org related traits (Figure 4A) and visual damage showing that some loci contributed to both phenotypes (i.e., cold acclimation damage/ photosynthetic efficiency and tolerance). Among the significantly associated markers, four SNPs were detected for F V , F V F 0, and F V F M (Table 3 and (Figures 5D, E). For example, BOPA1.7728.341, BOPA2.12.31368, BOPA2.12.31368, SCRI.RS.181360, and SCRI.RS.13891 have founded in the interval region on chromosome 3H between 434909031 bp and 446916578 bp (Figure 5D). Further, five QTNs were associated with AFF V , AFF V /F 0. Of them, BOPA1.ABC10084.1.2.363, SCRI.RS.144535, and SCRI.RS.224360 were located between 538658350 bp and 539231657 bp in the interval region on chromosome 3H (Table 3). These results suggested that the QTNs identified in several traits could be considered to be more stable. For the DH readings, eight significant SNPs were detected for the chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits F M, F V , F V /F M , and F V /F 0 (Table 3 and Figures 5G-J). All the abovementioned related traits were associated with two markers SCRI.RS.155758 and SCRI.RS.165588, which were detected on chromosome 1H at the interval regions of 539454103 bp and 539695184 bp (Figure 6). The R 2 values ranged between 0.112 and 0.195 for the 52 SNP markers across different traits, suggesting the presence of major QTNs controlling different chlorophyll fluorescence parameters.The genomic regions close to the associated SNPs detected in the GWAS were annotated using BARLEYMAP, and then the gene ontologies (GO) enrichments were performed by using Amigo (Tables 3 and 4). Of the 52 candidate genes identified by the GWAS dataset, we found that 15 genes were common among the different traits most of them with high confidence and predicted function (HC_G).In the interval detected region between 420355366 bp and 420364697 bp on chromosome 1H, there is one gene (HORVU1Hr1G057600) associated with the F M trait and encoding to PAX-interacting protein 1 (PAXIP1) (Tables 3). The PAXIP1 is involved in transcriptional regulation by histone methyltransferase (HMT) complexes and the DNA damage response. AF genes directly participate in the DNA repair pathway, post-translational modifications, and protein kinase which plays an important role in DNA replication and repair, transcription regulation, and chromosomal stability.In the identified regions on chromosome 1H, between 539695184 bp to 536426484 bp, two common AF and DH genes (HORVU1Hr1G087520) belong to the E3 SUMO-protein ligase family which is involved in a DNA repair pathway. In addition, one gene has an unknown function. HORVU1Hr1G085880 is another AF gene that encodes a ninja-family protein that plays a role in stress-related and growth-related signaling cascades (Table 3).In the interval detected on chromosome 3H between 431379904 bp and 539228382 bp, there are six AF genes with undescribed protein annotations and ten annotated genes (Table 3). Of the ten genes, two (HORVU3Hr1G057870 and HORVU3Hr1G071210) belong to the same enzyme family Mannan endo-1,4-betamannosidase 7 and Mannan endo-1,4-beta-mannosidase 2 protein, respectively. In addition to an enzyme (V-type proton ATPase subunit E), transcription factor (Bromodomain-containing factor 1), binding protein (Protein DEHYDRATION-INDUCED 19 homolog 3), transporter (ROP guanine nucleotide exchange factor 5) and splicing factor (splicing factor 3A subunit 3) (Table 3). The remaining genes are an Alpha/beta hydrolase domain-containing protein 13 and protein kinase superfamily protein.In the interval region on chromosome 6H between 13139794 bp and 13140854 bp, one gene (HORVU6Hr1G005960) encodes histone H2A 7 protein, a core element of the nucleosome, which plays an important role in transcription regulation, DNA repair and replication and chromosomal stability (Table 3).To provide more insight into the candidate gene products in the pathways related to low-temperature tolerance, three independent categories of gene ontology were categorized: cellular components (CC), biological processes (BP), and molecular functions (MF) were categorized. The discovered candidate genes were annotated, and several GO terms were observed to be mainly relevant to lowtemperature tolerance and chlorophyll fluorescence (Table 4). We identified 16 GO terms using the discovered genes. We found that four unique GO terms, including the zinc ion binding term (GO:0008270), hydrolase activity (GO:0004553), carbohydrate metabolic process (GO:0005975), nuclear-transcribed mRNA catabolic process, no-go mRNA decay (GO:0005634) exhibited an overrepresentation of candidate genes linked with chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits under cold acclimation stress, AF and DH treatments. Interstitially, two GO terms GO:0005515 and GO:0005634 presented no-go mRNA decay as one of the mRNA surveillance pathways. We suggested that most of the identified genes might be directly and/or indirectly involved in the photosynthetic energy conversion in barley plants under lowtemperature stress responses.To develop new low temperature-tolerant varieties/germplasm of spring barley as a part of the current project, F 1 populations were produced from the cross-between winter and spring barleys. A single seed of each of the F 1 populations was planted per pot and growth habits were recorded. The results showed that winter barleys exhibit no flowers while all tillers of spring barleys exhibit fully flowered (Figure 7). We observed the number of tillers is high in F 1 populations in comparison with the spring type of the parental lines. F 2 populations were segregated for growth habits (Figure 7).The genotypes with spring growth habits were selected and evaluated for cold tolerance. We identified some spring F 2 plants earlier to flowering than the parental lines. These genotypes entered advanced generations (RIL 2-5 ) and were validated in field conditions to be used in the breeding programs towards the breeding of high and stable-yielding varieties in the Canadian prairies. We, therefore, suggest additional studies to refine and validate the cold hardiness of these lines such as QTL mapping to identify and characterize the candidate genes underlying this quantitative trait. Together, this study demonstrated that cold hardiness can be introgressed into spring barleys from winter barleys easily without the restriction of genes transferring related to vernalization requirement.Identifying and characterizing key genes underlying lowtemperature tolerance has become the main priority for improving the hardiness of barley. A deeper comprehension of the regulation networking and pathways of these genes and their association with low-temperature stress (LTS) would assist in the illustration of how barley plants adapt to stress. Understanding these pathways might offer opportunities for increasing the levels of cold tolerance. Due to the complexity of injuries and symptoms, it is difficult to measure the cold tolerance of barley at the seedling stage. This study evaluated cold tolerance in barley using visual symptoms and chlorophyll fluorescence as indicators of photosynthetic energy conversion.Under cold acclimation and freezing shock stresses, the F V F M and F V /F 0 declined rapidly as an index of freezing tolerance and subsequent loss of viability (Table 1). We found that the time for full leaf wilting was shorter with the freezing shock treatment compared with the cold acclimation treatment. Evidence suggested that wilting was mainly initiated by reduced water-uptake, and the stomatal response to water stress was not influenced by lowered temperature (Benson, 2008). The reduction in osmotic potential accounted for an enhancement in sugars. Sugars are believed to function principally as cryoprotectants (Benson, 2008). The accumulation of these solutes at low temperatures is essential not only for freezing tolerance but also for the prevention of cell dehydration (Wang M. et al., 2021). Though other photosynthetic parameters might be used as indicators of viability, the F V F M parameter is suggested for some reasons. First, a minor change in the F V F M value is easily visible and indicates clearly that loss of viability is imminent. The consistency of the F V F M parameter also increases the ease with which a threshold level can be defined. More significantly, dissimilar light-dependent parameters, F V F M is obtained from specimens in the dark-adapted state, negating the need for an extended period of illumination before measurement. As a result, because the quantity of F V F M can be performed with a single saturating pulse, a rapid evaluation of a large number of plants can be evaluated quickly in a short time.An association between the decrease of F V /F M and frost tolerance during hardening and after freezing was observed in winter wheat (Clement and Hasselt, 1996). F V /F M values showed a significantly decreased in studied genotypes of oat (Avena sativa L.) during acclimation to low, nonfreezing temperatures. F V /F M measurement was also found to be highly associated with frost damage evaluation under field conditions (Rizza et al., 2001). The decreases in the chlorophyll fluorescence indexes in this study are revealing the reduction in PSII efficiency. This could lead to a decline in photosynthetic activity mainly because of a light-induced decrease in CO 2 assimilation and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which, in turn, prevents protein synthesis (Baker, 1996). Even though the decrease in photo-assimilation could be based on the damage to various elements of the photosynthetic apparatus, the term photoinhibition is commonly used to describe light-induced inhibition of the PSII activity (Murata et al., 2007). The produced ROS are accountable for the damage to PSII reaction centers by inhibiting the protein synthesis, which is required for the PSII repair, resulting in the stimulation of PSII photoinhibition (Murata et al., 2007). PSII is the most prone component to be destroyed in the thylakoid membranes. Hence, the main result of abiotic stress is to make PSII susceptible to photoinhibition. In this study, the association mapping materials were selected based on grain yield and a high percentage of winter survival. We found significant phenotypic variation among cultivars for chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits, including F 0 , F V , F M , F V /F 0, and F V /F M before (BF), two hours (AF), and 24 hours (DH) after lowtemperature treatment. These outcomes suggest that this panel could be used as a genetic source of seedling low-temperature tolerance in Western Canadian barley breeding programs.The chlorophyll fluorescence traits characterized in this study are quantitative traits, thus, several genomic regions with small effects that contribute to the phenotype are expected. We first identified the genes having significant SNPs (Tables 2, 3) and discovered several candidate genes underlying chlorophyll fluorescence trait variation. Gene expression for some identified genes in different tissues of the barley plant was revealed from the Global gene co-expression networks (GCNs) database (Supplementary Figure 2). Among these, 13 genes are associated with the chlorophyll fluorescence trait under cold acclimation stress. Interestingly, we found two SNP markers on chromosome 1H that have been reported to be correlated with environmental stress. On chromosome 1H, a peak SNP was discovered to be associated with AFF M , DHF M , DHF V , DHF V /F M , and DHF V /F 0 that encode E3 SUMO-protein ligase. SUMO is a small ubiquitin-related modifier conjugation that is essential for posttranslational modification controlled by environmental cues (Miura et al., 2007a;Miura and Hasegawa, 2010). SUMO conjugation/ deconjugation was involved in responses to oxidative stress, heat shock, phosphate limitation, hypoxia, flowering, pathogen defense, and ABA signaling (Kurepa et al., 2003;Lois et al., 2003;Murtas et al., 2003;Miura et al., 2005;Yoo et al., 2006;Lee et al., 2007). In Arabidopsis AtSIZ1 SUMO E3 ligase functions are conserved in several environmental responses including cold tolerance responses, salicylic acid in plant defense, basal thermotolerance, flowering time regulation, and freezing tolerance (Miura et al., 2005;Yoo et al., 2006;Lee et al., 2007;Miura et al., 2007b). Overexpression of the rice OsSIZ1 gene improved tolerance to drought, heat and salt tolerance in Arabidopsis (Mishra et al., 2018), and drought and heat tolerance in cotton (Mishra et al., 2017). Furthermore, they produced higher seed yields under different stress conditions and improved the photosynthesis rate of plants exposed to heat stress. The SUMO E3 Ligase SIZ1 is involved in anthocyanin accumulation under high light in Arabidopsis (Zheng et al., 2020), DNA demethylation (Kong et al., 2020), numerous abiotic stresses (Fang et al., 2022), phosphate homeostasis in rice (Pei et al., 2020), and protecting maize plants from paraquat toxicity (Wang H.et al., 2021). The siz1 mutation exhibits freezing sensitivity as a decrease in expression of CBF3/DREB1, a transcription factor for acclimation to cold temperatures (Miura and Hasegawa, 2010). Recently, the HORVU3Hr1G016010 gene encodes a SUMO found to be involved in the cold response in the VIR barley collection (2214 accession) (Sallam et al., 2021). In this investigation, we found that the HORVU1Hr1G087520 on chromosome 1H encodes E3 SUMOprotein ligase associated with the chlorophyll fluorescence trait under low-temperature conditions and could regulate the photosynthesis rate. Photosynthetic proteins are responsible for providing the cells with the energy to assemble the defensive molecules in response to stress (Ashraf and Harris, 2013). Thus, E3 SUMO could be essential for cold acclimation tolerances in barley at the posttranslational modification level.Further, we found a significant SNP associated with AFF V F 0 under cold acclimation stress in a gene HORVU1Hr1G085880 encoding Ninja-family protein. Ninja (NOVEL-INTERACTOR-OF-JAZ) protein regulates growth-related and stress-related signaling (Pauwels et al., 2010). ECAP NINJA is an adaptor protein linking JASMONATE-ZIM DOMAIN (JAZ) proteins with the co-repressor, TOPLESS (TPL), to regulate gene Prospects for Growth Habit. Two F 1 populations were derived from a cross between 02Ab431 (♀-winter type) and Bentley (♂-spring type). F 2 population segregated for growth habit (spring versus winter type). The photo was taken 39 days after seeding. suppression in Jasmonate (JA)-dependent the Arabidopsis root growth inhibition. ECAP interacts with JAZ6 and as an adaptor protein to inhibit the JA-responsive anthocyanin accumulation by TPR2 recruitment to the transcriptional complex (Li et al., 2020). Through protein Ninja, Jasmonate JAZ repressor proteins recruit the Groucho/Tup1-type co-repressor TPL and TPL-related proteins (TPRs) (Pauwels et al., 2010). In Arabidopsis thaliana, Ninja binding proteins AFP1 and AFP4 are key regulators of ABA signaling and stress responses in seedlings, as well as a negative regulator of jasmonate responses (Garcia et al., 2008). NINJA, the novel interaction of JAZ encodes a transcriptional repressor that participated in the jasmonic acid pathway in the leaf and root growth and development (Oblessuc et al., 2020). Phytohormones such as JA, ABA, and salicylic acid are essential elements of complex signaling networks of the stress response (Lee et al., 2007) and control gene expression.Based on our results, we have proven that the post-translational modification of protein related to photosynthesis is critical for barley plants, which dynamically modulated their response to environmental changes under LTS conditions. We also reported that SUMO E3 ligase could accelerate the ubiquitin-proteasome system, by conjugation of small ubiquitin-like modifiers to target substrate proteins (cold tolerance-related genes) (Johnson, 2004). Ubiquitin could likewise alter some key TFs that facilitate plant adaptation to cold stress (Callis, 2014). Our results revealed that GWAS identified two SNPs on chromosomes 1H located between 539454103 bp (SCRI.RS.155758) and 536426484 bp (SCRI.RS.137116) linked to the E3 SUMO and Ninja proteins, respectively (Table 3).Interestingly, after two hours of the cold acclimation stress, we discovered SNPs on chromosome 3H, detected at 440011663 bp within the HORVU3Hr1G058390 gene encoding a Bromodomaincontaining factor 1 protein was found to be associated with the F V , F V /F M, and F V /F 0 . Bromodomain-containing transcription factors control gene expression in three ways; (i) transcription activation, (ii) conserving transcription memory, and (ii) anti-silencing of the conserved chromosomal region (Loyola and Almouzni, 2004). The bromodomain proteins proceed with these functions via binding to acetylated histones and anchoring sequence-specific factors on the chromatin of target promoters. Further, bromodomain-containing proteins contain various families of 'epigenetic mark readers', which are basic to epigenetic gene regulation, and necessary for different environmental stress responses and cellular processes (Abiraami et al., 2022). In Arabidopsis, the bromodomain-containing transcription factors, GTE9, and GTE11 convert specific factors as BT2 to control gene expression. BT2 is a BTB domain-containing protein with an essential TAZ-zinc finger domain and calmodulinbinding domain C-terminal that responds to different metabolic and physiological responses (Mandadi et al., 2009). Loss-offunction mutants bt2 exhibited a hypersensitive response to ABAand sugar-mediated suppression of germination, suggesting the role of ABA in sugar signaling in germination and development. BT2 expression was controlled by several abiotic and biotic stresses including cold, ABA, hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), and methyl jasmonate (Mandadi et al., 2009). Cold-stress signal perception is the first stage, which is completed by various pathways. Transcriptional regulations are the next factors that control ABA-dependent signaling pathways to prompt the expression of coldregulated genes. Resulting in upregulating of hundreds of metabolite levels, some of which are identified to have protective results against the negative impacts of cold stress including soluble sugars, ROS, and photosynthetic metabolites (Heidarvand and Maali Amiri, 2010).On the other hand, we found SNPs on chromosome 6H located within the HORVU6Hr1G005960 gene that encodes histone H2A 7 protein, which has been associated with multiple traits, including F V , F V /F 0 under the cold acclimation condition. Histone H2A is one of the five key histone proteins engaged in the chromatin structure in eukaryotic cells that are responsible for maintaining the shape and structure of a nucleosome. Histone modification is an epigenetic mechanism involving changes in the chromatin structure of stressed genes via several chemical processes during the transcriptional and post-transcriptional modifications (Kim et al., 2015). These mechanisms play an essential role in plant survival under adverse environmental conditions (Elakhdar et al., 2022;Verma et al., 2022). In addition, epigenetic mechanisms might create stress memory which is convenient for the following generations (Verma et al., 2022), to regulate gene expression to cope with environmental stresses. Histone genes are suppressed by abiotic stresses such as drought (Kang et al., 2011), cold (Steward et al., 2000), and chilling tolerance (Zhang et al., 2012).A n S N P l o c a t e d a t 5 3 8 8 0 5 5 8 9 b p w i t h i n t h e HORVU3Hr1G071240 gene on chromosome 3H associated with F V , F V /F 0 after two hours of the cold acclimation stress falls within protein kinase superfamily protein. Protein kinases belonging to a wide superfamily play an essential role in numerous biological processes of plant growth and stress tolerance. In parallel, several stress-inducible protein kinase families for instance calciumdependent protein kinase (CDPK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and SNF1-related protein kinase (SnRK) are stimulated by ABA and different stress signals (Wrzaczek and Hirt, 2001;Ludwig et al., 2004). Gain-and loss-of-function findings have shown that signaling pathways resulting in cold, drought, salt, and tolerance are controlled through specific CDPK isoforms (Ludwig et al., 2004). Overexpression of Ca 2+dependent protein kinase enhances the cold and salt/drought tolerance in rice plants (Saijo et al., 2000). HORVU2Hr1G118320 gene encodes phosphatidylinositol kinase protein was previously found to affect cold response in the barley VIR collection (Sallam et al., 2021), maize (Zea mays) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Wang et al., 2018).On chromosome 3H, we found an SNP located within the HORVU3Hr1G064120 gene that encodes the Alpha/beta hydrolase domain-containing protein 13 associated with F V , F V /F 0 . The a/bhydrolase domain (ABHD) proteins are conserved in all organisms and belong to the a/b-hydrolase (ABH) superfamily. ABH family is involved in various processes including cell signaling, energy metabolism, growth, and development (Mindrebo et al., 2016), and in response to salinity stress (Liu et al., 2014). A few of a/bhydrolase fold enzymes, for example, esterase, phospholipase D, and prolyl oligopeptidase (POP5) play a key role in responses to several abiotic stress including drought, salt, and chilling in addition to ABA signaling of plants (Wang, 2002;Hong et al., 2010;Tan et al., 2013;Liu et al., 2014).On chromosome 3H, the detected SNP linked with V F 0 was found within the HORVU3Hr1G059320 gene, which encodes Vtype proton ATPase subunit E. V-ATPases are complexes of membrane-embedded proteins that function as ATP hydrolysisdriven proton pumps. V-ATPase maintains the pH and the regulates acidifying of intracellular compartments. In some cell types, it is aimed at the plasma membrane, where it regulates acidifying the extracellular environment (Vasanthakumar and Rubinstein, 2020). It was found that the survival of the cells was based strongly on adjusting or maintaining the V-ATPase activity under cold stress conditions (Dietz et al., 2001). Yoshida et al., (Yoshida et al., 1999), reported that plant sensitivity to low temperatures leads to an increase in frost and chilling hardiness including three vacuolar events related to V-ATPase activity. (a) Chilling stress leads to the suppression of V-ATPase activity. (b) Correspondingly, the formation of pH gradients is obstructed. (c) Then membranes adjusted their fluidity by improving the membrane content of unsaturated fatty acids. Evidence revealed that the association between stress injury and cytoplasm acidification was inveterate in studies relating V-ATPases from chilling-tolerant species for instance pea and chilling-sensitive species like mung bean (Hotsubo et al., 1998). The expression level of the wheat E subunit of the V-type H + -ATPase gene was increased by cold, drought, salt, and exogenous ABA treatment (Zhang et al., 2014). An in vitro study found that chilling rice plants at 10°C increased the vacuolar-type ATPase activity (Orr et al., 1995). Cold-tolerant Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus exhibited an upregulation in both proteins and subunit A mRNA in response to chilling at 2°C (Apse et al., 1999).Another significant SNP was detected on chromosome 3H within the HORVU3Hr1G061690 gene encoding the protein DEHYDRATION-INDUCED 19 associated F V F 0 . The Arabidopsis AtDi19 is a dehydration-induce protein that encodes a Cys2/His2 zinc-finger protein involved in high-salinity stress, ABA-independent dehydration, and light signaling events (Milla et al., 2006). In vitro assay showed that AtDi19-related proteins were phosphorylated through calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs). These findings reveal that the post-translational modification could be significant in controlling the function of the AtDi19 (Milla et al., 2006). The Arabidopsis AtDi19-3 is also a transcriptional activator that participates in plant response to drought, salinity, ABA, and H 2 O 2 events (Qin et al., 2014). In our study, we showed that the barley DEHYDRATION-INDUCED 19 is associated with chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits under low-temperature stress.Another important genomic region F V F 0 is on chromosome 3H, where their SNP is located within the HORVU3Hr1G062030 gene that encodes ROP guanine nucleotide exchange factor 5. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (RopGEFs) are activators of small GTPase proteins named ROPs in plants in turn regulate different cellular processes ranging from control growth to plant responses to environmental stimuli (Berken et al., 2005). The Arabidopsis RopGEF1 function as a negative regulator of signal transduction through the plant hormone ABA (Li et al., 2018). RopGEF1 was phosphorylated by calcium-dependent protein kinases CPK4. CPK4 stimulates RopGEF1 degradation. CPK4 also inhibits RopGEF1 activities in hairy root growth (Li et al., 2018). The RopGEF1 (HORVU3Hr1G085680.4) gene expression is upregulated in salttolerant genotypes, which might be associated with salt stress (Chen et al., 2022). Taken together, our results could provide the basis for an advanced study into the function of barley RopGEF1 in cold acclimation tolerance.Finally, an additional SNP was founded on chromosome 3H, within the HORVU3Hr1G063220 gene that encodes subunit 3 of the splicing factor 3a protein complex (Splicing Factor 3A subunit 3) associated with F V F 0 . The Arabidopsis ROA1/RBM25 gene has been identified as a splicing factor required for the splicing of transcripts from several ABA signal transduction pathway genes (Zhan et al., 2015). The Arabidopsis STA1 gene encodes a cold-induced pre-mRNA splicing factor, and sta1-1 is cold-sensitive and defective in the splicing of the cold-induced COR15A gene. The splicing factor mutant sta1-1 mutant displays that the STA1 protein regulates the splicing pattern and stability of some genes related to abiotic stress (Lee et al., 2006). The sta1-1 and rdm16-1 mutants exhibited hypersensitivity to ABA and salt stress in seed germination (Lee et al., 2006). In response to environmental stresses, mainly cold stress, plants modified their genome-wide alternative splicing profiles (Iida et al., 2004). Some plant hormones and environmental stresses, including cold and salt, dramatically adjust their expression and splicing profile of many important pre-mRNA splicing regulators mechanisms (Palusa et al., 2007).The identified GO terms were related to molecular mechanisms of causal photosynthetic responses and low-temperature tolerance in barley. GO findings showed that hydrolase activity, carbohydrate metabolic process, nuclear-transcribed mRNA catabolic process, nogo mRNA decay, and protein kinase activity were enriched by identified genes linked with photosynthetic traits under cold acclimation conditions. Also, our results indicated that the zinc ion binding, protein phosphorylation, ATP binding, and guanylnucleotide exchange factor activity GO terms (Table 4) were enriched under cold acclimation conditions. These results indicate that barley plants have initiated growth and repaired damaged tissues under cold acclimation conditions. Recently a study of meta-analysis study determined the GO that plays a key role in the mechanism of barley responses to cold stress such as guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity, the mRNA surveillance pathway and starch and sucrose metabolism (Alamholo and Tarinejad, 2022).Taken altogether, our functional annotation showed identified loci that were either within the known or close genes that play key roles in the photosynthetic signaling pathways, ABA signaling events, antioxidant biosynthesis, and posttranslational signals transduction. Overall, these outcomes suggest that various biological processes are involved in cold stress responses as well as post-transcriptional modification and epigenetics-mediated changes that may play essential roles in spring seedling responses to cold stress.In this study, 96 spring barley genotypes were evaluated for chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits before and after the cold acclimation conditions. The genotypes were genotyped using the Barley 9K iSelect SNP Array. Our principal conclusions are the following (1) Significant phenotypic variation among genotypes under low-temperature stress. (2) Several genomic regions associated with chlorophyll fluorescence under cold stress. (3) GWAS analysis indicated that a total of two and fifty markers were significantly associated with chlorophyll fluorescence-related traits before and after the cold stress treatment, respectively. Thirtynine significant QTNs and thirteen annotated candidate genes were identified. We first identified the genes having suggestive and significant GWAS SNPs and discovered several potential candidate genes underlying cold acclimation stress and/or chlorophyll fluorescence trait variation. Furthermore, the candidate genes were discovered around the significant SNPs mainly on chromosomes 1H, 3H, and 6H for cold-related-traits. Most of the candidate genes participate in plant response to abiotic stress at the post-transcriptional modification level including, for example, abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, hydrolase activity, protein kinase, and transduction of environmental signal transduction at the posttranslational modification levels. (4) Novel biparental populations (RIL 2 -5 ) developed from a cross between spring x winter type which can be used to identify the new QTL for lowtemperature tolerance in the spring barley in the future. Overall, our results provide fresh insight into potential low-temperature tolerance mechanisms in barley and the possibility of markerassisted selection in the future."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3194355670.json b/main/part_2/3194355670.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4f638a84237c2bcc1dff22a87c5de13e2d0cc47 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3194355670.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3bf2600feefaa59215f50d5c7cd01f33","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fbe75f80-8f50-4197-a0a7-88efb42c2781/retrieve","id":"1554474585"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c142750a-9bfc-4ba4-a78f-b01f438a66fb","content":"A new approach is required to reduce, or reverse, the negative impacts of our food production systems on the environment, which are contributing to land degradation, pollution and the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services on which we all depend.Many of the 2 billion smallholders who live in developing countries are adversely affected by climate change-drought, erratic weather and increased outbreaks of crop pests and diseases. Through our work with these farmers, research partners and conservation agencies, Bioversity International contributes to global understanding about the use and conservation of agricultural biodiversity. This resource can increase the productivity, resilience and sustainability of small-scale food production systems and has potential for development.Highlights from 2011 include a global effort to support scaled-up approaches to sustainability, research on using agricultural biodiversity to minimize pest and disease damage, and work with local communities in the forests of Mozambique.Following the International Year of Biodiversity in 2010, we celebrated the launch of the UN Decade on Biodiversity (2011Biodiversity ( -2021)). This year also saw the initiation of the preparation for the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development, a key step in laying the foundation for the next set of Sustainable Development Goals.In addition, CGIAR, a global partnership that unites organizations engaged in research for a food secure future, completed its reform process in 2011 and formulated 15 CGIAR Research Programs to implement its Strategy and Results Framework. Our organization played an active role in the formulation of nine programmes and contributed its expertise and long experience to ensure that the role of agricultural biodiversity in achieving the CGIAR system-level outcomes was appropriately reflected in these new research programs.These key influencing events in 2011, along with the increasing realization worldwide that past models of agricultural intensification are not sustainable, have prompted us to revisit our own mission and develop a more sharply focused strategy that will guide us during the decade to come. Working with our partners and donors, we have developed a new set of strategic priorities and a new research agenda to help achieve our vision of a world in which smallholder farming communities in developing countries are thriving and sustainable. As a result, we also revisited our structure and created five distinct and innovative research programmes. These ensure that Bioversity International is an excellent investment and world-class partner for supporters and users of our knowledge and research.While our strategy development was in progress, we continued to make important research strides in using and conserving agricultural biodiversity for livelihoods, sustainability and nutrition. Working with smallholder farmers and partners, our scientists provide novel research ideas and practical solutions. Throughout the pages of this report, you will find examples of Bioversity International's work with partners and stakeholders from Africa to Asia to the Americas.As we reflect on the year and what lies ahead, it is clear that biodiversity is a critical entry point to a host of issues that need solutions. Agricultural biodiversity has the potential to benefit millions and complement other approaches to agriculture. It can play a central role in meeting global challenges and transform agricultural systems, but it has too often and for too long been neglected by research and development agendas. This must change, as agricultural biodiversity is a powerful resource to help our world.We encourage you to read this report and to share it widely. With your help and engagement, we can make a lasting impact in research to achieve better nutrition, improve smallholders' livelihoods and enhance agricultural sustainability while conserving the plant genetic diversity upon which they depend. Thank you for your continued support of our efforts.his past year represented a turning point for agricultural biodiversity, with increasing recognition of its value to help provide a food secure future in a sustainable way.People, Food & Nature \"A landscape is a human construct. It is not nature as it was handed to us but the result of interaction between people and nature. We have worked on many individual crops, looking at how they contribute traits and resilience to agriculture, but increasingly we see that a lot of the value comes when these elements of biodiversity are inserted into a landscape,\" says Bioversity International Senior Scientist Pablo Eyzaguirre.Finding solutions that simultaneously meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation, sustainable development, food security and poverty reduction is no easy task. A clear example is trying to find synergies between conservation and food production needs. A landscape approach is one that tries to address these different types of demands at the same time.Smallholder farmers, policymakers, food companies, conservation agencies and grassroots organizations are already adopting innovative integrated approaches, although on a small scale. So far these have received little recognition from policymakers or investors, but a 3-year multi-stakeholder collaboration to scale up sustainable rural development, launched in 2011, hopes to change this.The 'Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Initiative' will support the scaling up of sustainable landscape management approaches in over 60 biodiversity hotspots. Partners representing over 120 organizations, including policymakers, donors, NGOs, farmers, research centres and conservation agencies, are tasked with gathering evidence and making this knowledge widely accessible to policymakers. Bioversity International is a co-organizer of this initiative led by Ecoagriculture Partners.Multidisciplinary teams have already started work to synthesize current evidence as part of the partnership's global review: a set of key questions whose answers are critical for setting the standards for agriculture in the 21st century.For example, what is the contribution of ecologically intensifying agricultural systems to food and ecosystem service production? Can we produce more food with less, by focusing on intensifying ecological processes rather than relying largely on external inputs, such as chemicals and excessive water use? Can we make agricultural systems multifunctional-producing both food and ecosystem services?Pests and diseases cause an estimated 27% worldwide loss to annual harvests, a loss that can have devastating impacts on income and food for poor smallholder farming households.One resource available to smallholder farmers to minimize the risk of pest and disease damage is the use of different varieties of a crop, planted together. Funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), a 3-year Bioversity International project in China, Ecuador, Morocco and Uganda shows that growing a mix of varieties of a crop can decrease farmers' chances of losing entire harvests. This is because different varieties offer different resistance levels to outbreaks, rather than relying on a few high-yielding yet more genetically uniform modern varieties. It is also a sustainable and affordable alternative to expensive chemical inputs. Two of the six crops studied in the global project, banana and the common bean, were evaluated in terms of the number of varieties grown and the area planted with each variety. These two crops are significant to Ugandan farmers-banana and the common bean are the most important sources of carbohydrates in Uganda, with more than 7 million people depending on them for daily meals.\"The project showed that using diversity can help minimize risk. For example, farmers in Uganda who grow diverse sets of varieties of bananas and common beans lose less of their harvest when the incidence of the pest or disease is high. But, having enough diversity in a farmer's production system is not enough on its own. Success depends on farmers and the farming community having the knowledge and leadership capacity to evaluate the benefits that using this diversity gives to them. This, in turn, means that local, national and international agencies take an active role in strengthening local institutions to enable farmers to take a greater role in the management of their genetic resources,\" says Devra Jarvis, Senior Scientist at Bioversity International.The Niassa National Reserve extends over 42,000 km 2 along the Mozambique border with Tanzania, and includes one of the least disturbed areas of Africa's deciduous Miombo woodlands. It was established to protect wildlife and also includes populations of a number of the world's threatened tree species.Bioversity International project, 'Sustaining forest resources for people and the environment in the Niassa National Reserve in Mozambique' is studying the relationship between the people living in the reserve and the tree 5 species that are important to them, to see if the use of the trees is placing them under threat and if sustainable alternatives are needed.About 40,000 people live in the reserve using trees for many purposes: fuel wood for home cooking and charcoal production for sale, food, medicine, timber for construction and sale, material for carving cultural objects, fishing rods, and talismans. People here live in povertyon average they earn about US$ 35 per year-and depend on the trees for food and income, especially at times of food shortage when they eat the fruit and edible leaves. Trees are also a source of honey, the sale of which is the main source of income for many people. Yet the practices that people use, for example, cutting trees for honey collection, are placing the resources that they need under threat.The first year's fieldwork consisted of conducting interviews in communities in the reserve to understand people's dependence on and their use of forest resources.\"The second year of the project saw more focus on ecological studies following up on the previous year's surveys of how people used the forests. We saw the impacts of honey hunting and illegal logging, and that current practices are unsustainable. The next step will focus on honey hunting, working with people in the communities to identify and test more sustainable collection methods,\" says Judy Loo, Senior Scientist at Bioversity International.The final stage of the project will be to work with the people living in the reserve to help them develop more sustainable practices, to produce recommendations for reserve managers that will help them balance the need for wildlife habitat conservation with those of the local people, and to share this model widely.Hunger is a worldwide problem, which, together with nutrient deficiencies known as 'hidden hunger', undermines the growth, development, health and productivity of over 2 billion people. Our agricultural systems collectively produce enough staple food for everyone at the moment, in aggregate, but access to nutritious food remains a challenge for many. The predicted world population increase to 9 billion by 2050 is set to increase demand on these systems which are already being pushed to the boundaries of sustainability and placing our ecosystems under extreme pressure. Bioversity International's Nutrition Strategy was launched in 2011 to further understand how using agricultural biodiversity within smallholder farming systems can contribute to food security and nutrition. During the year, Bioversity International started two nutrition initiatives to gather robust evidence of the value of agricultural biodiversity for nutrition and health and further explore its links to livelihoods.The Grand Challenges Explorations is an initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to enable researchers worldwide to test unorthodox ideas that address persistent global health and development challenges.Bioversity International, in collaboration with Save the Children UK, is undertaking an innovative global health project through this initiative: 'The role of wild and underutilized foods in daily costs of diets in Baringo, Kenya'. This project focuses on reaching \"a clearer understanding of the role of wild and underutilized foods in helping to deliver a nutritionally adequate diet-at the same time reducing its cost. This will enable researchers and policymakers to develop accessible and local food-based solutions to malnutrition in mothers and 6 to 24-month-old children,\" says Federico Mattei, Research Support Officer, Nutrition and Marketing Diversity Programme, who will be involved in carrying out the research with local partners.The use of a 'Cost of Diet' tool, which calculates the minimum amount of money a household will have to spend to meet their full nutritional requirements using locally available foods, means \"we will be able to model the impact these foods could have on the affordability of a nutritious diet,\" explains Alex Rees, Head of Hunger Reduction, Save the Children UK.As a part of this project, diets with and without foods from wild species and Neglected and Underutilized Species (NUS), will be modelled to determine the nutritional and cost benefits of these foods to assist in the design of programme interventions aimed at improving diet quality and contributing to a reduction in child stunting. NUS are plant and animal species that are used traditionally for food, fibre, fodder, oil or medicinal properties, but have not yet been adopted by large-scale agriculture.In 2011, a new 5-year global project, 'Biodiversity for food and nutrition' was successfully approved to start in 2012.Funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the US$ 35-million project will provide evidence of the nutritional value of agricultural biodiversity and its role in promoting healthy diets and strengthening livelihoods in the four countries leading the project: Brazil, Kenya, Sri Lanka and Turkey. Bioversity International is coordinating the project with implementation support from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO) and a significant number of international partners.The project aims to use this evidence to influence policies, development programmes and markets that support the conservation and sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity. Part of the project will be to develop tools, knowledge and best practices to mobilize and mainstream the use of nutritionally-rich biodiversity and scale up its use for food and nutrition in development, value chains and local community initiatives.\"It is increasingly recognized at an international level that there are important links between biodiversity, food and nutrition, yet research in this area remains fragmented and uncoordinated. Bioversity International's involvement in a project of this nature is critical as the world's foremost research-for-development organization working in the field of mobilizing biodiversity for food and nutrition,\" says Danny Hunter, Bioversity International Project Leader.\"Good nutrition must be one of the major goals of agriculture and production systems, requiring a combination of agricultural, health, fortification and supplementation strategies. While promoting household production, Bioversity International is concentrating its efforts to understand and promote access to and availability of nutritious and diverse foods,\" says Bruce Cogill, Programme Leader, Nutrition and Marketing Diversity. This year, Bioversity launched a 10-year nutrition strategy which promotes the use of agricultural biodiversity within food production systems to provide nutritionallyrich food sources that contribute to dietary diversity and to better nutrition and health. This builds on research of the past few years that has focused on the role and impact of traditional foods on dietary diversity and livelihoods.The Nutrition and Marketing Diversity Programme will build evidence about how the benefits derived from growing and using agriculturally biodiverse foods can benefit people's livelihoods and ecosystems. Bioversity International is focusing its work on smallholder farming communitiescomprising 70% of the world's poorest 1.4 billion people-in low and middle income countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Central America and South Asia. Within these countries, like in many other countries around the world, people's diets have changed, moving away from traditional, local and diverse foods to eating more cereal-based staples and energy-dense fats and sugars. Some of these changes are adversely affecting people's health and nutrition, as well as the environment, and are not sustainable in the long term.The strategy has four objectives that fall into two broader categories: research and evidence, and development and policy.Objective 1: To strengthen the empirical evidence of agricultural biodiversity's role for nutrition and health.Objective 2: To ensure that the production of more nutritious foods through commercial pathways reflects agriculturally biodiverse practices and cultural and consumer practices.Objective 3: To determine best practices and delivery systems of agricultural biodiversity in nutrition and health development programmes.Objective 4: To mainstream the role of agricultural biodiversity into public health and nutrition policy and practice by sharing evidence and providing local solutions.For smallholder farmers and rural communities, agricultural biodiversity is a resource within reach that can help increase income and income stability. Diversified farming systems and sustainable small-scale forestry offer opportunities to provide a more regular income and enhanced food security across seasons and between years. Within these communities, women play an important but often unrecognized role in producing, gathering, processing and marketing food.Bioversity International is working to make markets accessible to the rural poor by expanding the focus beyond main commodity crops and developing innovative 'farm to fork' interventions. Bioversity International works in partnership with agencies, community groups and the private sector to improve the livelihoods of smallholder farmers. Our research in 2011 addressed production, marketing technologies and policies needed to ensure the equitable participation of the poor in new markets of diverse products. Here are some highlights.Back to Market 2011 marks the end of a 10-year research effort funded by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), to empower poor rural communities in Asia and Latin America by strengthening their identity, income opportunities and nutritional security through the improved use and marketing of Neglected and Underutilized Species (NUS). NUS are traditional crops that are often better adapted to grow in marginal areas, with little need for irrigation, pesticides and fertilizers, but have fallen outside mainstream agricultural research and development.\"Thanks to this project, we now have the evidence that these species are a key asset to support poor farming communities,\" says Stefano Padulosi, Senior Scientist at Bioversity International.In India, Bioversity International and partners worked with 200 farming families to revive the cultivation of minor millets. As a result, Indian small millet growers increased their yields by 70% and their income by 30%. Women farmers integrated millets into innovative snack foods, which have reached urban markets and are now consumed in schools. Selling those foods to boost household incomes and the entrepreneurial skills acquired were also key for the empowerment and selfesteem of the women involved.In Bolivia, Peru and Ecuador, the cultivation of traditional grains, such as cañihua, amaranth and some neglected varieties of quinoa, was being abandoned because of poor economic competitiveness in markets. The interventions varied from developing new varieties of cañihua to providing prototypes of machines that drastically reduce processing times-from 6 hours to 7 minutes to process 12 kg of quinoa. By improving production, processing and marketing, these crops are now back in the farmers' fields offering new income opportunities. smallholder farmers through the diversity of beans cultivated, to the skill of the farmers, and to the differences in taste produced from different growing conditions.In 2011, 'Cocoa of Excellence' received and analyzed 119 samples of cocoa beans from 22 countries-50 of which were selected and processed into chocolateto be evaluated by a jury of professionals and connoisseurs who then assigned 12 'Cocoa of Excellence' awards. In addition, a second jury met during the Salon du Chocolat, Paris and gave four awards to farmers from Malaysia, Costa Rica, Ecuador and Cameroon.These events provide opportunities to establish links between cocoa growers and professionals in the chocolate industry. For example, at the Salon du Chocolat, one chocolate manufacturer met with the country representative of a farmer that had provided a nominated cocoa sample resulting in a business link between the farmer and the manufacturer.Cocoa is starting to get more attention in countries that produce it. In Peru, national competitions are now organized every year and there are trained specialists in the sensory evaluation of cocoa beans, liqueurs and chocolates. Brazil is organizing its first Chocolate and Cocoa Show in Salvador, Bahia, in 2012.\"The development of cocoa as a high-value crop and commodity has great potential for smallholder farmers, particularly in West Africa, Latin America and Asia,\" says Stephan Weise, Deputy Director General of Research at Bioversity International. \"We are looking at ways to expand those possibilities.\" \"We have to act at different levels. We have to conserve these species, create networks and infrastructure and build capacity so that farmers and communities can take advantage of cultivating NUS. Creating an enabling policy environment, both at a national and international level, is necessary to deploy the economic potential of these species for the poor. Last but not least we need champions, people spreading the message,\" added Padulosi.Building on this experience, Bioversity International is beginning a new project funded by IFAD to investigate the use of NUS in increasing the adaptation and resilience of production systems in the face of climate change.Cocoa is a vital source of income for some 6 million smallholder farmers in West Africa, Latin America and Asia. Compared with coffee, wine or tobacco, cocoa is still a low-value industrial commodity, but demand for fine-flavour, added-value cocoa is steadily increasing. Many projects have been, and continue to be, implemented worldwide to support on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity. The challenge of these projects is to identify, design and implement interventions that make the conservation of crop diversity compatible with improved livelihoods and well-being among the farmers who conserve it. The aim is to maintain diversity while also reducing poverty.\"One of the aims of this study is to fill the gap of systematic evaluation of the success of on-farm conservation projects in producing outcomes that maintain crop diversity on farm and at the same time create livelihood benefits for farmers,\" says Mauricio Bellon, Principal Scientist at Bioversity International. This research is also a very important tool for donors, policymakers and practitioners who need to have the conceptual and methodological tools to assess the success of their projects and the lessons learned, and hence their investments.The increasing loss of plant genetic resources, including those of crops, their wild relatives, and trees, has irreversible global implications. Genetic resources are critical to ensure the ability of future generations to adapt and enhance agriculture as needed. For almost 40 years, Bioversity International has been at the forefront of global efforts to collect, conserve and use agricultural biodiversity. Our new strategy includes two complementary conservation approaches: ex situ (conservation of seeds in long-term storage facilities) and in situ (conservation of plants on farms and in the wild), with greater emphasis on the less researched area, in situ conservation.In 2011, we marked many conservation milestones, including the 10-year anniversary of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, a new atlas of crop wild relatives and new research on forest genetic resources.The Atlas of Guatemalan Crop Wild Relatives (Atlas Guatemalteco de Parientes Silvestres de las Plantas Cultivadas) is a new web resource to facilitate the conservation and use of wild plant species that are related to cultivated crops.Crop wild relatives are increasingly important to agriculture because they contain beneficial traits needed for breeding improved varieties that can be hardier, more productive, more nutritious, more disease and drought resistant, and better adapted to climate change.Guatemala, in the heart of Mesoamerica, is one of the world's most important centres of plant domestication and agricultural origin and, consequently, an area with an abundance of crop wild relatives.Launched in 2011, the atlas is the result of nearly a decade of extensive collaboration between Bioversity International and partners. It provides detailed information about 105 species or subspecies of wild Guatemalan plants, chosen for this study because of their economic, cultural and nutritional importance.Through an interactive Google Earth® interface, users can consult maps that show the known distribution and potential range of each plant included in the study, based on climate and the locations where they were collected. Additional maps display areas of high species richness and diversity to assist conservation efforts. The maps draw upon a database of 2,593 records of scientific specimens conserved in numerous national and international institutions.\"We are pleased that the Ministry of the Environment of Guatemala has made plans to immediately use the atlas to document the presence of crop wild relatives within their system of protected areas,\" says Marleni Ramirez, Regional Director, Bioversity International Americas Office.The atlas, and supporting database, is a resource for those who want to learn about and promote the conservation and use of the many unique and often threatened crop wild relatives in Guatemala, including plant breeders, conservationists, students and teachers.An international event marked 10 years of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, a powerful legal instrument that defines the legal status and conditions for pooling, exchanging and conserving plant genetic resources for food and agriculture between countries. Without it, the costs and negotiations on a case-by-case basis to access plant genetic resources would be extremely difficult, and in many cases, impossible.Plant genetic resources are important, as they are the raw materials needed by farmers, scientists and breeders to help achieve food security in the face of climate change, land and water scarcity, and an increasing population. Since its adoption, the Treaty has been ratified by 127 countries and includes at least 1.5 million plant samples of 64 crops and forages.At the 2011 anniversary event, Bioversity International Director General Emile Frison called for greater collaboration between countries and international organizations to ensure that as much plant genetic diversity as possible is conserved and equitably used by the global community in pursuit of food security and environmental sustainability.CGIAR has played an important role throughout the negotiations of the Treaty, providing technical input and acting as one of the key resources for accessing genetic biodiversity. CGIAR genebanks host around 50% of the materials currently in the multilateral system of access and benefit sharing, including a wide diversity of local and traditional varieties, crop wild relatives, as well as neglected and underutilized crops. These materials are available through the Treaty's Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA), and more than 8,000 samples are exchanged every week.The Treaty was adopted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO) Conference in November 2001 and came into force in 2004.Slash-and-burn agriculture is a traditional way to prepare agricultural fields by felling trees which are then allowed to dry before being burned. This practice is often perceived as an enemy of forests, but according to Laura Snook, Programme Leader, Forest Genetic Resources, Bioversity International, it can favour the regeneration of dozens of valuable tropical timber tree species.\"Banning the use of fire, which many governments are doing in the name of protecting the environment, can reduce options for maintaining a diverse, valuable and sustainable resource,\" says Snook. This conclusion is based on many years of work in Quintana Roo, Mexico, where over 100 local communities manage 800,000 ha of the largest tropical forest in Mesoamerica for harvesting timber.The research began in 1996, when 24 half-hectare clearances were created in the forest using three different methods: eight were clear-felled which means all the trees were cut down and left on site with their stumps remaining in the ground; eight were cleared by bulldozers that uprooted the trees and pushed them to the side; while eight were cleared by slash and burn. The researchers then planted seeds and seedlings of mahogany, the most valuable timber species, to see how they would fare.\"Slash and burn was best for mahogany,\" says Snook, \"but what was really interesting, when we went back more than a decade later, was to find that more than 100 tree species had regenerated in the plotsmany of them commercially valuable.\"The study revealed clear differences between treatments. In clear-felled plots, valuable hardwoods occupied less than 30% of the plots, while on plots cleared by machine or by slash and burn, 60% of the trees were commercially valuable. Between the machined and burned plots, the largest 10% of trees were significantly bigger on the slash and burn plots.The differences were not hard to explain. Trees on clear-felled plots sprouted from the trunks and roots left behind, quickly resulting in a closed canopy, favouring species that can tolerate shade. Trees that result from resprouting stumps or roots are typically multi-stemmed, so even timber species are unlikely to provide quality logs.\"Many valuable timber trees require sunlight to regenerate-they don't survive in the small gaps produced by timber harvesting or in the clear-felled plots because they are quickly overshadowed,\" says Snook. \"Slash-and-burn treatments mimic the effects of hurricanes and lightning strikes. Burning not only controls competition, but releases nutrients that stimulate plant growth.\" Bioversity International's work results in knowledge that can shift policies, transform agricultural practices and open possibilities for income, improved nutrition and sustainable farming practices for poor rural communities. We develop knowledge products, tools, capacity and good practices with farmers, local and national governments, development workers, trainers and academia.'Plant Genetic Resources and Food Security-Stakeholders' Perspectives on the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture' is an essential guide to understand the way international policy affects food security.The book, jointly published by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN (FAO), Bioversity International and Earthscan, gives a comprehensive overview of the negotiations and implementation of the Treaty and explains the different interests and views at stake between all players in the global food chain. This is the latest in the Earthscan-Bioversity International book series 'Issues in Agricultural Biodiversity', which reviews current knowledge around topical issues in agricultural biodiversity, identifying gaps in our knowledge base, synthesizing lessons learned and proposing future research and development actions.Bioversity International was one of the co-organizers of a 4-day agricultural knowledge sharefair in Rome in September 2011. This event was a forum to share success stories, knowledge, experience and innovations on information and communication technologies and processes relating to agriculture, climate change, food security and rural development.Over 160 presenters from 70 countries took part in the sharefair and many more followed events live online. In addition to live webcasts of many sessions, which were watched by around 4,500 people, there was a very successful social media campaign with a strong focus on Twitter-tweets using the event hashtag #SFROME reached over 200,000 people. Participants examined how to ensure better communication to share knowledge and found innovative ways to bring that knowledge to farmers. Bioversity International participated in several sessions including a demonstration of an e-learning course for pre-breeding, a look at the GENESYS Gateway to Genetic Resources, a talk on using traditional crops for sustainable livelihoods and an opportunity to taste quinoa cake, as well as contributing articles to the sharefair social reporting blog and daily event newsletter. Emile Frison gave an opening speech with the President of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Kanayo F. Nwanze.'Pre-breeding for effective use of plant genetic resources', an online learning course, was released this year to strengthen capacity at the interface between germplasm conservation and its use in plant breeding.Pre-breeding is a necessary first step in using biodiversity arising from crop wild relatives and other unimproved materials to broaden the range of heritable genetic variations available to generate new crop varieties that have increased yields yet rely less on external inputs. This free online course, jointly sponsored by Bioversity International, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), and the Global Crop Diversity Trust, using the platform of the Global Partnership Initiative for Plant Breeding Capacity Building, was designed to strengthen skills among plant breeders, germplasm curators, university staff and students, field technicians and extension agents.By the end of 2011, over 5,000 people had registered for the course, with more requesting the free CD.In recent years, research has yielded a rapidly growing knowledge base on how agricultural biodiversity is linked to food security, nutrition, livelihoods, environmental sustainability and climate change. Yet according to consultations with universities in 2009 and 2010, agricultural biodiversity education courses are rare or non-existent and there is a need to integrate such knowledge into curricula.The new guide, Teaching Agrobiodiversity: A Curriculum Guide for Higher Education, is a tool to support this integration, designed to be flexible to fit into a range of institutional settings. It also suggests suitable entry points for quickly integrating aspects of agricultural biodiversity into existing courses. The guide discusses key issues in agricultural biodiversity education and presents a curriculum framework with 14 topics central to agricultural biodiversity processes, conservation and management. Each topic is briefly introduced along with key learning points, suggested contents, a bibliography and a list of internet resources.A free PDF was made available this year, with distribution of hard copies to key stakeholders including university partners planned for early 2012.The Crop Ontology Tool is an online resource that enables anyone to browse and download information regarding crop traits. This online tool is very useful for breeders, farmers and scientists when searching for crop trait information. It can be used to search for information regarding specific plant traits. For example, when researching the trait 'height' of cassava, the tool provides not only a detailed explanation that relates to the specific query, but also any other relevant information that relates to the trait. The Crop Ontology Tool was developed as a collective activity between CGIAR members and their partners, with Bioversity International leading the project. By the end of 2011, 49 users, who also act as curators, were already registered and regularly uploading content. Further development is planned for 2012.'GRIN-Global' is a project that provides the world's crop genebanks with a powerful, flexible, easy-to-use global plant genetic resource information management system.Improving the capability of genebanks to provide data to a global accession-level information system will make it easier to assess the status of the world's plant genetic resources and to identify priority needs for their conservation. It will also allow genebanks to make use of a generic web portal, GENESYS, which offers users online access to collections and an online ordering system, compliant with the International Treaty's Multilateral System (MLS) and Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA).During 2011, GRIN-Global training was delivered to people from more than 35 genebanks around the world.In July 2011, the Platform for Agrobiodiversity Research (PAR) facilitated an expert workshop on climate change and genetic resources for food and agriculture. 'Contributing to food security and sustainability in a changing world' was organized by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN (FAO) Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. The workshop explored different challenges that confront agriculture and the options that exist or could be developed to help feed the world, cope with climate change and improve the impact of agriculture on the environment.The event took place prior to the 13th Session of the Commission, in which PAR also participated. PAR is hosted by Bioversity International, which also provides the secretariat, and is made possible with support from the Christensen Fund.Spatial analysis helps to gather information about plant diversity in specific geographical locations around the world. This information about the status of plant species and their patterns of distribution enables the setting of priority areas for conservation by identifying which species are most at risk and where there are gaps in collections. This vital information helps us tackle global challenges such as food security and climate change.The Training Manual On Spatial Analysis Of Plant Diversity and Distribution which was published in 2010, has so far been downloaded by over 2,000 people, and was made available in Spanish this year. A French version will also be published in 2012.The Global Musa Genetic Resources Network, or 'MusaNet' for short, was launched in 2011. MusaNet, coordinated by Bioversity International, is a global collaborative framework and a partnership of key stakeholders, to safeguard Musa genetic resources and promote their use around the world.Membership is based on expertise, with 62 members already having joined, representing the scientific research community, government representatives, educational institutions and development agencies. Regional research networks and other key initiatives such as ProMusa and the Global Musa Genomic Consortium (GMGC) are also represented in the expert committee.MusaNet is an online resource with member discussion forums and workspaces for the different critical thematic areas, e.g. evaluation, diversity, information and conservation, the latest Musa news and publications on genetic resources, and links to the Musa Germplasm Information System (MGIS) which includes accessions data and climatic maps.In 2011, Bioversity International and partners reached the half-way point on a project, 'Rescuing and promoting native chilies in their centre of origin'. This project is looking at how to increase the incomes of smallholders through the use of chili (Capsicum) diversity. Chili is a crop cultivated by farmers for thousands of years in the Americas, used as a spice, a vegetable and for medicinal purposes.Highlights of the project so far include new technologies, manuals and guidelines regarding the harvest and post-harvest operations of Capsicum, as well as increases in the number of accessions held in genebanks in Peru and Bolivia, making up the largest and most diverse national collections ever assembled. The huge variation in biochemical attributes mirrors the accession level diversity-and has led to interest from chili processors and exporters in those countries.\"There are good reasons to embed the continued use of traditional varieties into development and improvement strategies designed to improve the well-being of some of the world's poorest communities,\" concluded a newly published paper. 'An Heuristic Framework for Identifying Multiple Ways of Supporting the Conservation and Use of Traditional Crop Varieties within the Agricultural Production System' brings together available knowledge about the conservation and use of traditional crop varieties on farm. This comprehensive analysis is packaged in a way to better understand how traditional varieties can support the production strategies of rural communities and smallscale farming. Areas covered include onfarm traditional crop diversity and access to that diversity, ways to improve the use of diversity, as well as benefits derived from its use including market and non-market based actions and incentives.A pioneering study by Bioversity International and partners has introduced a new approach to finding solutions for climate change adaptation by integrating the predicted climatic shifts of a region with its traditional seed systems.The study investigated how climate change might affect the environments of Mexican maize farmers in four different agroecological zones, and then analysed where farmers currently source their seeds. It was discovered that over 90% of seeds in the study groups came from within a 10km radius of farmers' communities and from areas of less than 50m of difference in altitude.These results showed that farmers already have access to predicted novel maize environments within the traditional spatial scope of their seed systems, suggesting that these systems may be able to provide farmers with landraces suitable to agroecological conditions under predicted climate change, with the exception of farmers in the highlands, who might need help in coping with more extreme climatic changes.This approach has great potential to be applied in other countries in need of customized solutions for climate change adaptation.'Seeds for Needs', a project currently being carried out in Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea, has made significant steps towards empowering local women and increasing their options for climate change adaptation. The project combines modern GIS technologies and the preferences of local farmers, to identify seed solutions that will help these farmers cope in the future.In its first year, Bioversity International worked mostly with women's farmer groups, extension workers and local genebank managers on growing locally available seeds in different test sites and getting feedback from farmers on crop performance. In Ethiopia, more than 100 women farmers took part in selecting 25 out of 100 shortlisted varieties of durum wheat, varieties that were then distributed among communities to be sown for a second year of evaluation.The next phase will look into better understanding local seed systems and improving policies to ensure farmer access to seeds held in genebanks.'Agricultural biodiversity is essential for a sustainable improvement in food and nutrition security', a paper published in 2011 by Bioversity International Director General Emile Frison and co-authors in the open-access journal Sustainability, asserts the essential role of agricultural biodiversity in sustainably improving food and nutrition security.Previously viewed as being useful solely for trait selection in scientific breeding programmes, the paper reveals evidence that suggests diversity not only increases farm productivity, but also increases the resistance of farming systems to shocks. Agricultural biodiversity has been proven to help maintain and increase soil fertility, mitigate the impacts of pests and diseases, deal better with unpredictable weather patterns, and stimulate diverse diets that deliver better nutrition and health.Moreover, the paper puts special emphasis on adopting a cross-sectoral approach to reassessing the role of agricultural biodiversity in sustainable food production.The PACS project conducted pilot studies in Bolivia, Peru and India to better understand the effectiveness of rewarding farmers for the provision of conservation services that benefit broader society. The Board has adopted a risk management policy that has been communicated to all staff together with a detailed management guideline. The policy includes a framework by which Bioversity International's management identifies, evaluates and prioritizes risks and opportunities across the organization; develops risk mitigation strategies that balance benefits with costs; monitors the implementation of these strategies; and reports on results, in conjunction with finance and administration staff and internal audit, semi-annually to a Task Group of the Board and annually to the full Board.The Board is satisfied that Bioversity International has adopted and implements a comprehensive risk management system.One distinct key contribution from partnerships is bringing together actors who would not usually find ways to work together, to deliver science and create new knowledge about the use and conservation of agricultural biodiversity.Another contribution to partners is the leveraging capacity we have-connecting knowledge and science of global scope to local action, and vice versa. We are able to see the big picture of sustainability, food security and poverty and, by working with rural communities, we are able to use this knowledge to find solutions and to ensure they can be scaled up and out.Another indicator of our value is the positive feedback we receive from our partners and donors-a wide range of stakeholders with whom we develop long-term associations. We learn from partners, depend upon their insights and knowledge, and work as equals with them to create lasting change.Most importantly, the value Bioversity International brings to initiatives is demonstrated through the rural communities and smallholder farmers around the world who are providing for their families in innovative ways, becoming community leaders and advocates, and using their knowledge from farm to fork. These are the true champions of agricultural biodiversity.Bioversity International relies entirely on support from donors to undertake and champion world-class research with and for poor farming communities. We are proud to use that support in the most effective way possible. In all our work, our aim is to ensure that investment establishes knowledge that leads to approaches and tools that are selfsustaining, and that influence and shape the decisions of policymakers.• All our work is funded through voluntary contributions by donors.• 82% of our expenditure was allocated to research-for-development and critical services that directly support that research agenda.• Bioversity International is a member of the CGIAR Consortium, the world's largest publicly funded research body.• For every US$ 1 invested in CGIAR, at least US$ 9 worth of additional food is produced in developing countries.• Spending on agricultural research offers rates of return of about 40% higher than any other development investment.• We do not run our own laboratories; instead, we work through national and regional partners, building up capacity and making donor investment work harder.• We create dynamic coalitions of donors to leverage funds, expertise and networks across different disciplines.Financial and administrative management for Bioversity International is governed by the CGIAR Financial Guideline Series, a series of financial management and policy practices issued out of the World Bank and approved by all of the members of CGIAR.Bioversity International has a strong system of internal controls which are regularly reviewed and audited. We have designed a Risk Management Framework which enables Bioversity International's Board of Trustees to put in place firm controls for managing key risks.Over the next 10 years, Bioversity International aims to increase its real-term investment in research-for-development by more than 50% to US$ 62 million per annum by 2021. This will enable us to direct and support research efforts to potentially improve the lives of 320 million people who live in the regions where we plan to work.This ambition will only be realized with donor support; as a non-profit organization we want to engage more donors than ever before in a critically important agenda-and ensure a food and nutrition secure future for millions of poor smallholder farmers, and an environmentally sustainable future for us all.Our commitment is to work with donors as partners in change, together making significant contributions to global goals on sustainable food security and development and the conservation of agricultural biodiversity.We sincerely thank all of our supporters and partners. This list represents a sample of the many supporters involved with the projects highlighted in this annual report. We have made an effort to recognize as many as possible on these pages and regret we have not been able to mention every supporter in the space allowed."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3199725105.json b/main/part_2/3199725105.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0be5a1e88f5e5e7fa4086176a562908172a49c22 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3199725105.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"13feaeaf0ce14c0a4147a64e7937b884","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2236a641-d29b-49a8-8728-3c4abae93f47/retrieve","id":"-1068992316"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9ac885c5-d640-48ab-9fd8-e2dcadf03702","content":"Tables Table 1. The surface areas of development domains for countries of Latin America It is extremely challenging to formulate and evaluate agricultural development strategies for regions as large and diverse as proposed in the Action Areas, and it will require multiple perspectives and thoughtful simplifications (Omamo et al. 2006). Empirical studies in Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda (e.g. Pender et al. 1999;Pender et al. 2004;Ehui and Pender 2005) suggest that interaction of the three socio-economic and biophysical layers-population density, agricultural potential and market access-provide good explanatory power in predicting the type of agricultural enterprises and development pathways encountered in different rural communities, as the layers are strongly related to the feasibility and attractiveness of specific development and livelihood strategies (Wood et al. 1999). Omamo et al. (2006) used for East and Central Africa (ECA) GIS tools and databases to gain a better appreciation of the regional patterns of agriculture and of agricultural development challenges and opportunities. The GIS analysis disaggregates the region into geographical units, called 'development domains', in which similar agricultural development problems or opportunities are likely to occur, based on the spatial layers population density, agricultural potential and market access. The breakdown is done by classifying each of the three factors into two values: high or low.In the proposal for the CGIAR Research Program on Integrated Systems for the Humid Tropics an example is given for ECA, based on the Nairobi 2012 workshop. Stratification here is by domain at Field Site level with a different form of stratification used at the Action Site level ('farming system'). The development domains in this example are defined using consistent data and criteria across the region, thus helping diagnose development constraints and formulate and evaluate strategic intervention options in comparable ways. These development domains permit consideration of the following issues: Where are those geographic areas within and across countries in ECA in which development problems and opportunities are likely to be most similar? Where will specific types of development policies, investments, livelihood options and technologies likely be most effective? For established developmental successes in any given location in ECA, where can similar conditions be found in the region?In order to determine development domains for the four Action Areas in the Humidtropics, a quick review of available global spatial data layers was conducted. We focussed on three socio-economic and biophysical layers: Natural Resource Integrity, Market access and Population density and poverty. Addition information on the described data layers can be found in Annex A.The amount and quality of available data on environmental conditions is growing fast-primarily due to improved earth observation methods (Lotze-Campen 2011). The large extend of data makes it difficult to select a proper threshold that captures the various forms of natural resource integrity. There are several global land cover mapping projects, varying in legends, resolution and temporal coverage (e.g. Bartholomé et al. 2002;Hansen et al. 2006;and Erb et al. 2007;van Asselen and Verburg 2012). In this review we focus on data layers related to land degradation and decline in ecosystem function as CRP1.2 will guide diagnostics of natural resource degradation and provide sitespecific responses to it.The Global Potential Vegetation dataset shows historical changes in global land cover and specifically vegetation cover and changes to its characteristics over time (1700 to 1992) (Ramankutty and Foley 1999) The dataset is recently been updated by Global Agricultural Lands, which provides global cropland and pasture data from 1700-2007 (Ramankutty et al. 2008).Besides using changes in vegetation, it is possible to use land degradation as a measure of natural resource integrity. There is the Global Assessment of Human-induced Soil Degradation (GLASOD). The map is based on soil mapping and dependent on expert judgement, and thus qualitative and potentially subjective. Moreover it has a complex legend, combining extent and degree (severity) for four major degradation types (water and wind erosion, physical and chemical deterioration) (Oldeman et al. 1990).The availability of satellite information introduced new mapping possibilities. For example, land degradation can now be defined as a long-term decline in ecosystem function and measured in terms of net primary productivity (NPP). Land degradation may be measured by change in net primary productivity (NPP) with deviation from the norm taken as an indicator of land degradation or improvement (Foley at al. 1999). (Vitousek et al. 1986). The Global Change in Net Primary Productivity (1981Productivity ( -2003) ) uses the remotely-sensed normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) derived from remotely sensed imagery as a proxy for land degradation (Bai et al. 2008).There are many global data layers with a proxy to determine NPP. Some examples are the Global Patterns in Net Primary Productivity (1995), which maps the net amount of solar energy converted to plant organic matter through photosynthesis. NPP is measured in units of elemental carbon and represents the primary food energy source for the world's ecosystems (Imhoff et al. 2004). The Human Appropriation of Net Primary Productivity (HANPP) provides global patterns in human consumption of net primary productivity (NPP). Human appropriation of net primary productivity (HANPP) for the year 1995, through the consumption of food, paper, wood and fibre, alters the composition of the atmosphere, levels of biodiversity, energy flows within food webs and the provision of important ecosystem services (Imhoff et al. 2004). The Global human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) is determined for the year 2000, based on vegetation modelling, agricultural and forestry statistics, and geographical information systems data on land use, land cover and soil degradation that localizes human impact on ecosystems (Haberl et al. 2007). The last dataset is described by Foley et al. (2007) as, despite the limitations to how far it we can interpret the human appropriation of NPP, a major breakthrough in the documentation of human presence in the biosphere.CRP1.2 aims for improved natural resource integrity through e.g. soil fertility improvement, and increased availability of organic inputs and manure. Improved natural resource integrity is especially needed in those areas where human's influence on natural production is largest; therefore we opt to use Global human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) as a first threshold to determine the development domains.Satellite images of lights at night have shown to be highly correlated with industrial activity and Gross Domestic Product (Doll et al. 2006). Gallup et al. (1999) introduced the concept of GDP density, calculated by multiplying GDP per capita by the number of people per square kilometre. Sutton and Costanza (2002) derived global estimates of market and non-market values derived from night-time satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation.Travel time to major cities: A global map of accessibility is often used in spatial analyses as it measures urbanization in the perspective of travel time to 8500 major cities (Nelson 2008). Recent critics, however, state that the information has not been integrated to facilitate analyses of market access and market influence, which has hampered many socio-economic analyses to date (Lotze-Campen 2011). The analysis by Verburg et al. (2011) provides an important improvement in this respect. The Market Access and Influence is global dataset on various market accessibility indicators on a 1 km 2 spatial resolution. Their analysis shows that market access is distinctly different from population patterns in some regions, which may help us to understand the prevalence of current economic conditions there. These are mostly areas with high population density, but little access to markets and, hence, a large share of subsistence farming and local economic activities.As CRP1.2 will work in diverse, selected agro-ecologies, market conditions, and farming systems to develop innovations aiming at increased productivity, improved market performance, and sustainable management of the natural resource base, we use the Market Access Index as a threshold for the development domains.Spatially explicit basic data on socio-economic factors are relatively scarce, i.e. as these can't be simply collected with satellites or other devices (Lotze-Campen 2011). The basic data on socio-economic driving forces, i.e. population density and wealth (measured as gross domestic product per capita), have been prepared for spatially explicit analyses Improved data on patterns of human settlement and trends in population can help researchers and policy makers better understand differences between urban and rural areas in terms of their impacts on the environment and vulnerability to environmental variability and change. The Global Rural-Urban Mapping Project, Version 1 (GRUMPv1) data collection builds on the Gridded Population of the World, but provides a higher resolution gridded population data product at 30 arc-seconds, or ~1 km at the equator, for 1990, 1995 and 2000.At the moment Gridded Population of the World and GRUMP are being improved, by methods of Tatem et al. (2007) Linard and Tatem (2010) and Linard et al. (2012). Through detailed mapping of settlements, and linkage of these settlement extents with gazetteer population numbers, the substantial majority of African and Asian residents can be mapped within settlements with good precision (AfriPop, AsiaPop). Data on Latin America will become available later this year.Poverty is defined as an economic and social condition of lack of both money and basic necessities needed for a healthy and acceptable life, such as food, water, education, healthcare and shelter. As a measure of poverty and health, a global subnational map of the prevalence of underweight children can be used (Global Subnational Prevalence of Child Malnutrition). However, the most common poverty indicator is the headcount ratio (HCR), defined as the percent of population living below an absolute poverty line. The most commonly used poverty lines are the international USD 1.25 and USD 2 per capita/day expressed in Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) at a reference year. A Global Poverty Map Derived From Satellite Data has been produced at 30 arc second resolution using a poverty index calculated by dividing population count (LandScan 2004) by the brightness of satellite observed lighting (DMSP nighttime lights) (Elvidge et al. 2007). The map summarizes the HCR per administrative units. The HarvestChoice team in collaboration with CIAT extracted subnational poverty prevalence rates from nationally representative household surveys conducted in various years (Wood et al. 2010). The HarvestChoice Poverty maps (and related study) were commissioned by the CGIAR Strategy Results and Framework Team and produced through contributions from the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), and the World Bank.As CRP1.2 aims at rural poverty alleviation in the context of system intensification, we used the HarvestChoice Poverty maps as threshold.The development domain will be based on the three socio-economic and biophysical layers; natural resource integrity, market influence and poverty. In the following section we will provide some maps of the various global layers.The first threshold for the domains is natural resource integrity (Figure 1). The map shows where on earth, and how strongly, humans alter ecological energy flows, thus localizing the intensity of human domination of ecosystems.Cropland and infrastructure are used most intensively, resulting in high global average HANPP values on these areas (Haberl et al. 2011).Figure 1. Total HANPP as a percentage of NPP0.Source: Haberl et al. (2011).The second threshold for the development domains is market access index (Figure 2). The map illustrates global patterns in market access and influence. The market access index is strongest near large cities, declining to zero in regions without human populations. The market access index is saturated near 1.0 in large cities, declining to moderate values in densely populated regions which have an abundance of smaller cities and towns, as intercity distances are so small that the index never declines below 0.2. Examples of such regions are West Africa, Central America and parts of South America, India and China (Verburg et al. 2011).We use these data layers (Figures 1 to 3) to determine the development domains (Figure 4). For Natural resource integrity (HANNP) we used as thresholds Low (L) equal and less than 20 %, and High (H) more than 20%. For the market access index we used as thresholds Low (L) equal and less than 0.1, and High (H) more than 0.1. For poverty we used as thresholds Low (L) equal and less than 35% of people living below than USD 1.25/day, and High (H) more than 35%. The first threshold is poverty (Figure 3). The maps shows the percentage of the population who lives on less than USD 1.25 per day, which is highest in countries in Asia and Africa, and low in the developed world. Based on the discussion to add market access and influence as soft criteria, we present as well development domains based on Figures 1 and 3 only. For Natural resource integrity (HANNP) we used as thresholds Low (L) equal and less than 20 %, and High (H) more than 20%. For poverty we used as thresholds Low (L) equal and less than 35% of people living below than USD 1.25/day, and High (H) more than 35%. In the next paragraphs we present the results per Action Area.Latin America West Africa Note: 'H' and 'L' refer to the following characteristics Natural Resource Integrity (HANNP), market access and poverty, in that order.East Africa The GDP density map is calculated by multiplying GDP per capita by the number of people per square kilometre.Location and climate have large effects on income levels and income growth through their effects on transport costs, disease burdens, and agricultural productivity, among other channels. Geography also seems to affect economic policy choices. Many geographic regions that have not been conducive to modern economic growth have high population densities and are experiencing rapid increases in population. At particular disadvantage are regions located far from coasts and ocean-navigable rivers, for which the transport costs of international trade are high and tropical regions, which bear a heavy burden of disease. Moreover, a large portion of population growth over the next thirty years is expected to occur in these geographically disadvantaged regions.The Geographically based Economic data is a global dataset on economic activity for all terrestrial grid cells and includes. The G-Econ project is gridded dataset at a 1 degree longitude by 1 degree latitude resolution. This is approximately 100 km by 100 km, which is somewhat smaller than the size of the major subnational political entities for most large countries (e.g. states in the United States, Laender in Germany, or oblasts in Russia) and approximately the same size as the second level political entities in most countries (e.g. counties in the United States).The main effort of this research is to create data on gross cell product. In addition, we have merged the economic data with other important demographic and geophysical data such as climate, physical attributes, location indicators, population, and luminosity. This dataset is publicly available to all not-for-profit researchers. It will be helpful in environmental and economic studies of energy, environment, and global warming.1990. All eight datasets are available for download as global products, and the first five datasets are also available as continental, regional, and national subsets. Gridded population of the world (GPW), v3-CIESIN, IFPRI and WRI GPWv3 depicts the distribution of human population across the globe. GPWv3 provides globally consistent and spatially explicit human population information and data for use in research, policy making, and communications. This is a gridded, or raster, data product that renders global population data at the scale and extent required to demonstrate the spatial relationship of human populations and the environment across the globe. The purpose of GPW is to provide a spatially disaggregated population layer that is compatible with datasets from social, economic, and Earth science fields. The gridded dataset is constructed from national or subnational input units (usually administrative units) of varying resolutions. The native grid cell resolution is 2.5 arc-minutes, or ~5 km at the equator, although aggregates at coarser resolutions are also provided. Separate grids are available for population count and density per grid cell.Available at: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v3The HarvestChoice team in collaboration with CIAT extracted subnational poverty prevalence rates from nationally representative household surveys conducted in various years. The calculations are based on the comparison between the total household per capita consumption expenditure (a synthetic indicator expressing the money-metric welfare utility level) and the international USD 1.25 and USD 2/day poverty lines. The most common poverty indicator is the headcount ratio (HCR), defined as the percent of population living below an absolute poverty line. The most commonly used poverty lines are the international USD 1.25 and USD 2 per capita/day expressed in Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) at a reference year (2005 in this case).Available at: http://povertymap.info (password protected)Human appropriation of net primary productivity (year 1995)The Global Patterns in Human Appropriation of Net Primary Productivity (HANPP) portion of the HANPP Collection represents a digital map of human appropriation of net primary productivity measured in units of elemental carbon on a one-quarter degree global grid. Net primary productivity (NPP), the net amount of solar energy converted to plant organic matter through photosynthesis, can be measured in units of elemental carbon and represents the primary food energy source for the world's ecosystems. Humans appropriate net primary productivity through the consumption of food, paper, wood and fibre, which alters the composition of the atmosphere, levels of biodiversity, energy flows within food webs and the provision of important ecosystem services.Available at: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/hanpp-human-appropriation-net-primary-productivity/data-download LandScan global population database-Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)The LandScan High Resolution Global Population Dataset refines the best available census data using geographic information system and remote sensing technologies. LandScanTM gives global population distribution at approximately 1 km resolution (30\" X 30\"). The LandScan algorithm uses spatial data and imagery analysis technologies and a multi-variable dasymetric modelling approach to disaggregate census counts within an administrative boundary. Since no single population distribution model can account for the differences in spatial data availability, quality, scale, and accuracy as well as the differences in cultural settlement practices, LandScan population distribution models are tailored to match the data conditions and geographical nature of each individual country and region.Available at: http://www.ornl.gov/sci/landscan/index.shtmlThe Market Access and Influence Data depicts market influence globally. The data jointly represent variations in both market strength and accessibility based on three market influence indices derived from an index of accessibility to market locations and national-level gross domestic product (purchasing power parity). These indices show strong correspondence with human population density while also revealing several distinct and useful relationships with other global environmental patterns. As market influence grows, the need for high resolution global data on market influence and its dynamics will become increasingly important to understanding and forecasting global environmental change.Available at: http://www.ivm.vu.nl/en/Organisation/departments/spatial-analysis-decision-support/Market_Influence_ Data/index.aspThe SRES gridded global population dataset covers three global population forecasts for the period 1990-2100 at 0.5 degrees resolution. The basis for these forecasts is the SRES scenarios developed for the IPCC climate-modelling framework. In addition, a gridded dataset of urban and rural populations for the period 1990-2050 is presented.Available at: http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/datasets/downscaled/ Travel time to major cities: A global map of accessibilityThe global map of accessibility measures urbanization from the new perspective of travel time to 8500 major cities (>50,000). Digital maps of road, river and rail transport networks, population data, satellite-derived maps of land cover and terrain and information on border crossing times are combined using advanced geographical modelling techniques. The map fills an important gap in our understanding of economic, physical and even social connectivity.Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/jrc/index.cfm?id=1410&obj_id=6670&dt_code=NWS&lang=en "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3239286065.json b/main/part_2/3239286065.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72faf15b6f474e932225db1b5ec9f41269a29b1c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3239286065.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"dca804d6b3f6474cc343368c8caad0a4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d94a35fd-1da3-47de-a095-ac2ccfda2926/retrieve","id":"-867153013"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"37f5e3c2-5e14-4f12-b890-cc60c2eef875","content":"This paper analyzes transaction data from agricultural surveys carried out in five countries in low-and-middle-income countries to test for a difference in the prices received by men and by women marketing the same crop in the same village. In a unique finding, we identify a gap between the price received by women and the price received by men on three separate continents. Echoing similar results from other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, using mobile phone ownership and use data, we provide evidence to suggest that women farmers likely suffer from unequal access to information. The presence of asymmetric information is therefore indicated to be a limiting factor in women's ability to receive a fair unit price.Regardless which country around the world is analyzed, the gender pay gap, meaning a difference in wages between women and men who work the same job and who have similar demographic backgrounds, is present and quantifiable (OECD 2022). In low-income countries, formal labor markets are much less accessible, and agriculture remains a significant source of income and labor. In the context of countries where access to formal jobs is scarce, and agricultural production still plays a dominant role, how do biases against women manifest in women's economic interactions? Though true for all countries, in particular in low-income countries, women and women-headed households face significant discrimination.Women face biases due to socio-cultural beliefs around gender roles and related practices which can result in women being marginalized, isolated and often subject to violence.We find that, in the case of the countries in our sample, this social discrimination and bias against women manifests in the form of women receiving a lower price for their marketed crops. More specifically, although agriculture is a significant source of income for women-headed households, in this paper we document for the first time that women-headed households in Bangladesh, Malawi, Peru, Tanzania and Uganda receive lower prices than comparable households, headed by men, who sell the same crop in the same village. We call this wedge between women's agricultural sales prices and men's agricultural sales prices the \"gender price gap\" to echo the phrase used to describe wage discrimination against women in labor markets around the world. In this paper, we provide evidence indicating that unequal access to information likely contributes to this price gap. An important implication of a gender-based price gap is that interventions or policies such as indiscriminately targeted input subsidies or agricultural credit provision may widen the gap between men-headed households and their women-headed counterparts.In that type of informational and social context, men who participate stand to capture relatively greater benefit from these programs. For women-headed households who do not have equal access to output markets, or who receive a lower price, the effects are likely to be dampened.The price discrepancy we have described significantly inhibits women's ability to improve their economic status 1, 2 . If women-headed households cannot leverage agriculture effectively to generate income and \"catch up\" to comparable households headed by men, they have relatively few other places to turn for 1 Women-headed households, the primary focus of this paper, are typically formed due to divorce, separation or widowhood. In order to distinguish women who market agricultural goods from men marketing agricultural goods we isolate exclusively transactions carried out in womenheaded households and households headed by men. Often, divorce comes with negative social costs. Due to the prevalence of norms around divorce and widowhood, women-headed households are among the most marginalized groups in low-income countries (Van de Walle, 2013; Milazzo and Van de Walle, 2017; World Bank, 2019 2 A recent report by the World Bank (2019) titled Profiting from Parity: Unlocking the Potential of Women's Businesses in Africa outlines the need to focus on women-run businesses and highlights key constraints women entrepreneurs face. The authors emphasize the importance of internalized social norms which are hostile to women or inconsiderate, at best, of women's needs as entrepreneurs.resources. If women household heads struggle to support their families with food and tuition expenses, then this can have effects not only for seniors, children and others in the household but also neighbors, relatives and others in the village in the form of negative externalities. Reducing technological, social and other barriers to information about market prices could therefore reduce the vulnerability of women-headed households to the negative economic effects caused by situations of asymmetric information.If women receive a lower price for comparable agricultural outputs, a natural question is: what is the source of the difference in the price received by men and the price received by women? Rather than there being a single factor driving a gender price gap, it seems likely that different factors may drive a wedge between men's sales and women's sales prices. In different contexts the gender price gap may be larger or smaller. In Card et al. (2016) the authors identify the infamous gender pay gap as coming from at least two channels: bargaining effects, meaning women in general operate with lower social capital and less bargaining power, and sorting effects, meaning women have a preference for working at firms where other women work, and those firms tend to be lower-profit firms. In the case of a gender price gap and an agricultural marketing context, the analogous sorting effects would be that women and men transact with different purchasers due to various factors including where they get the best price, how easy it is for them to interact with the seller and the probability of not making a sale as well as the energy and opportunity cost of time associated with a market sale. We find that households headed by men are more likely to sell in the village market, for example, while women prefer to sell to their family or neighbors in order to capture a particular price for their outputs and to reduce their transport costs. 3 Households headed by men and households headed by women appear to operate with different levels of access to information. In the process of marketing crops, both women and men must gather information about market prices, transport their goods to market and secure a buyer for their quantity of agricultural outputs.Unfortunately, without purpose-collected survey data it is very difficult to distinguish if women sellers have direct knowledge of the market price or if they have knowledge of the sale prices of other sellers in their vicinity. If women have knowledge of the market price this improves their bargaining position. If gendered information networks similar to those documented in Mekonnen et al. (2018) are present, meaning men-headed households or men's social networks do not share information with women-headed households marketing the same crop, this could negatively influence women-headed household's ability to receive fair price. This idea builds on the literature analyzing the influence of asymmetric information on individual well-being and on firm performance (Akerlof, 1978).One paper which highlights important informational gaps related to agriculture is Miura et al. (2020), who use a randomized intervention in Zambia and conclude that husbands and wives do not disclose to one another their receipt of a free voucher covering the cost of trans-porting agricultural goods to market. Even husbands and wives, individuals within the same household, may operate their enterprises and household activities with different information. If men and women within the same household fail to share relevant economic information then, we argue, the same could be true for households headed by men and households headed by women. Mekonnen et al. (2018) use agricultural survey data to measure individual's information networks, and find that only 23% of women-headed households in Ethiopia have a man in their information or social network compared to 93% of men. From their data, the authors in Mekonnen et al. (2018) find that only 50% of women household head's social networks contain another farmer versus 84% of men household heads and, likewise, only 63% of women household heads discussed agricultural practices with their information/social network versus 87% of men. These patterns are indicative of information networks that are segregated by gender, or where women household heads have relatively less access to contacts, farmers and men who are in a position to relay information about agriculture. A recent paper from Germany, which collected primary data on 15 cartels, finds that cartels rely primarily on social and peer networks to form and be maintained. Only 2 of the 156 surveyed (1.2%) cartel participants were women. This demonstrates that, for majority of cartels, information and peer networks dominated by men are an important factor (Haucap et al., 2022). 4 The presence of an asymmetric information problem implicates an immediate policy solution: whenever possible, reduce asymmetric information. The introduction of mobile phones and mobile phone networks has been shown to reduce price dispersion, which suggests increased information flows (Aker, 2010;Aker and Fafchamps, 2015). Do women and men benefit equally from existing flows of agricultural information via mobile phones? It has been documented that women in general, have greater barriers to accessing technology. This discrepancy in access is also known as \"the digital divide\" (World Bank, 2019). A map of the probability of mobile ownership of women household heads can be seen in Figure 1. We see that mobile phone ownership by women household heads varies greatly across our sample. Importantly, if women do not benefit equally from flows of information, as suggested by the findings in Mekonnen et al. (2018), then the introduction of mobile phones as an intervention could exacerbate unequal outcomes unintentionally by reinforcing gendered information networks and consolidating the gains for households headed by men relative to those headed by women.Recent evidence has shown that women can benefit economically from access to knowledge and training through mobile devices in an agricultural setting, and that agricultural information is indeed transmitted within social networks which favor men farmers over women farmers (Mekonnen et al., 2018;Mullally et al., 2022;Caldarola et al., 2022). If asymmetric information is a primary barrier, then increased access to information and communication technologies, reducing the digital divide, as well as transparent market information, could improve the market prices women receive and, ultimately, could improve the well-being of womenheaded households who rely on agricultural sales as a key source of income. effects could be in effect and be a significant source of unequal prices. Last, we use descriptive data on mobile phone ownership and mobile phone use to buttress our argument that women and men have differential access to information shared within gendered information networks.Potential Drivers of a Gender-based Price WedgeIn order to best address the price gap issue from a policy perspective it is important to dissect where the gender-based price differences might originate. Figure 2 is a kernel density plot of regression coefficients from all five countries. Each data point used in this graph corresponds to a coefficient estimated by regressing the log of men's prices on the log of women's prices. Each point is therefore a coefficient for a particular crop in a country in a village, in what is essentially a between-village regression. We can see from the graph that in the case of all five countries, differences in the log women's price do not explain a significant share of the men's price. If there were no difference between men and women sellers, and women's and men's prices thus move together, then this coefficient should not be different from one. Given that we have reason to believe this price gap exists and it is persistent across countries, what are the proximate causes or the significant drivers of gender-based price differences? The two primary channels, we theorize, are through sorting into different purchasers and low bargaining power. Building from David Card's explanation of the gender pay gap, low bargaining power of women engaged in agricultural sales and marketing could be a significant factor in the agricultural marketing context as well.As an example, the idea of the \"digital divide\" refers to the situation where certain groups have access to technology and gain an advantage, while others who do not have access to technology are \"left behind.\" We believe that women are one of the groups likely to be most disparately affected by the digital divide, or the lack of access to technology and communication. This concept is relevant to womenheaded households because these barriers to accessing technologies and information contributes to women's lack of capacity to expand their agricultural income. Put simply, a lack of access to information lowers women's bargaining power when marketing crops. Again, if women-headed households cannot generate revenue from agriculture, they have few other places to turn for resources. Reducing the influence of asymmetric information by improving access to technology could, given the right context, be a critical piece of supporting women-headed households to raise their level of well-being and invest in their households and in their children.Other recent literature highlights how gender and gaps in technological access intersect. A paper by Gray et al. (2017) indicates that, in Latin America, men use the internet more than women. Beaman and Dillon (2018) find that technologies diffuse slower to women-headed households in Ethiopia as women are excluded from relevant information networks. In other parts of the world women farmers also lack access to markets and related telecommunications infrastructure (Chassin, 2022). In the case of our data, we find that men are much more likely to access extension services both in-person and via mobile for all the countries in our sample where extension data were included. 5 Women are much less likely to send SMS messages regarding farming activities than they are to send and receive phone calls.Men who reside or farm around women-headed households may not share price information with other men or women who are their geographic neighbors.Women-headed households in our sample, with a few exceptions, have much lower rates of mobile ownership than households headed by men. Based on Mekonnen et al. (2018), we hypothesize that women in our sample have limited access to information networks where agricultural information is shared and primarily discuss agriculture with other women. Women may effectively be isolated from relevant social networks where price and other information is communicated.Given that a situation of asymmetric information could be present, women may have no \"anchoring\" point or reference point for their price. If women sellers do not have any reference point, they may accept a lower price due to the uncertainty associated with finding another buyer and the risk of total loss. To indicate the presence of gendered information networks, we first assess differences in mobile ownership between men household heads and women household heads at different levels of consumption per adult equivalent. 6 Mobile ownership data is presented by gender and for different levels of concentration of women's information networks. In the absence of primary survey data, we define villages with larger women's information networks as villages where women household heads own a higher relative share of the village phones than men heads.Lower quality produce or outputs could also be a significant factor influencing women's ability to capture a fair market price. If women lack access to laborers and to credit to hire labor, if labor is being rationed, then women have less capacity to prepare their land for farming. Differential returns to investments such as seeds, fertilizer and irrigation might induce lower quality produce for women-headed households as a result of the high demand and low supply of manual labor on farms headed by women. There is some evidence that women typically hold low quality or marginal land which also could lower the quality of their produce. 7 In this context, a man who is a household head may spend more time working the soil in preparation for planting which may lead to higher yields. This would lower women's bargaining power at market because their crop is of lower quality. One recent paper even suggests that even if women's crops are similar quality, men could perceive them to be lower quality, which would also lower bargaining power (Feld et al., 2022).This quality differential could be more pronounced with annual crops than with tree crops. Annual crops require a larger physical cost at planting time, as the land must be tilled (aerated) and loosened-up to accept the planting of seeds or seedlings. In the case of tree crops, trees are already planted, and thus only require a small amount of labor for maintenance prior to the harvest time.It is an unfortunate truth that women are less financially literate than men (Lusardi andMitchell, 2008, 2014). The difference in financial literacy between men and women has been demonstrated to be strongly correlated with gender stereotypes and differences in numeracy. Based on the available literature it seems likely that this disparity is present in most or all of the areas included in our sample. Women are also known to be more risk-averse which could drive them to accept a lower price in order to avoid the uncertainty of a total loss (Charness and Gneezy, 2012;Croson and Gneezy, 2009). Recent literature from sub-Saharan Africa has demonstrated that individuals from firms that are less liquid accept lower prices for the goods they sell (Hardy et al., 2022). A lack of liquidity, often synonymous with a great deal of uncertainty, may drive women to accept lower prices considering the urgency of their needs and the lack of available alternatives.Women face more challenges bringing their goods to market as they benefit less from men family members that might help shoulder the burden. Women household heads face a high opportunity cost of time as they also often have no other adults in the household to support the activity of the household including generating income sufficient to feed and care for all household members. Women may therefore feel the need to accept a lower price, as it is more costly for them to return home with the goods and bring them to market yet again or to another market. 8There is strong social stigma around women who work and women-headed households that typically form as the result of a divorce or widowhood (Van de Walle, 2013). Interacting or transacting with women could be a social \"bad\" causing negative reputational effects for men among other members of the community.These biases could be stated and explicit or there could be implicit biases, meaning sub-conscious influences on behavior and economic interactions (Bertrand et al., 2005). Due to the fact that women are considered to have a lower social status, this may influence their capacity to negotiate for higher prices (Goldstein and Udry,8 If women-headed households tend to be physically on the margins of the population centers, meaning a greater distance from the nearest population center, this imposes an additional cost for women relative to men in delivering goods to market. This, in turn, could induce women to accept a lower price once they have brought their goods to market. We present analysis from our sample in appendix D which shows very little quantitative evidence that women do tend to live further from population centers.In the case of women who market agricultural goods, sorting effects would manifest as buyer-specific rents. This translates into men having access to purchasers that are able to pay a higher price. This type of dynamic is noted in recent work by Halvarsson et al. (2022). Using Swedish data, the authors find that the export of goods that are intensive in interpersonal contacts widens the gender wage gap. This implies that women have less access to social networks that facilitate economic activity. In an agricultural marketing context, women are often obliged to sell to neighbors and relatives, and they may therefore accept a lower price. This is exactly what we see in our data, and the tables describing to whom women and men sell their crops can be found in the Appendix section B. In the context of an econometric estimate, this could be represented with the inclusion of buyer-specific fixed effects. Once these fixed effects are included, if the gender price gap declines, that indicates the \"sorting\" effect is in action. The size of the change may indicate the importance of the sorting effects relative to the bargaining effects.If women are receiving a lower price for their agricultural outputs, they have little access to formal labor markets, and they can't get access to capital to start their business where are they supposed to turn? The gender-based price wedge, ostensibly a tax on women's outputs, seems to erode women-headed household's margins. Women still farm their land likely because they have few options in terms of income streams and it provides a (relatively) consistent source of food, particularly in remote areas with little or no market for services. Literature which analyzes the yield gap, that is the differential between the productivity (yield) on plots cultivated by women vs those cultivated by men, could be problematic without considering the unobserved price differential. If women know they will receive a lower price they may plant less land and perhaps farm less intensively as there is less incentive to turn out crops for sale, and the marginal product of labor/time may be higher elsewhere. This is consistent with results from Udry (1996), a seminal work on gender in sub-Saharan Africa, which found that women are able to generate highly productive plots though only for very small plots of land.This analysis follows two principal approaches. The first is to analyze the price differential between men's and women's prices as measured via transaction data using a simple crop and village fixed effects procedure. In certain cases, additional fixed-effects dummy-variables are included. The second step is to analyze mobile phone ownership using descriptive statistics and basic regressions to evaluate the presence of asymmetric information in the form of gendered information networks.The primary empirical model for the transaction data is the transaction price, \uD835\uDC5D \uD835\uDC56 , regressed on a dummy for the gender of the household head (individual i), plus, \uD835\uDEFC \uD835\uDC58 , a dummy representing individual crops, k, and an area fixed effect, \uD835\uDEFE \uD835\uDC51 , for village v.\uD835\uDC65 \uD835\uDC56 is a dummy variable that takes one if the head of the household is a woman. The regression equation is as follows:If a seller's gender does not affect the transaction price the coefficient β on this variable should be statistically indistinguishable from zero. If a price wedge exists then this variable will have a negative impact on the transaction price, demonstrating that women receive lower prices.In a separate procedure, illustrated earlier in Figure 1 with a kernel density plot, we regress the log of the men's transaction price on the transaction price received by women marketing the same crop in the same village. The universe of observations is therefore restricted to villages for which we observe both a man and a woman transacting in the same crop and the regression tests how strongly the men's price and the women's price are related.In words, this can be thought of as \"how much of the men household head's price does the women's price explain?\" If the two prices are equal, and they move in sync, then the value of this coefficient should be unity. There should naturally be some variation across villages and crops.To better understand women-headed household's access to information we analyze the mobile ownership patterns of women-headed households and men-headed households using descriptive statistics, as well as regressions of mobile ownership on a dummy representing the gender of the household head. We then divide the sample by tercile of consumption per adult equivalent. We find that women-headed households in a higher consumption bracket are less likely to own a mobile phone relative to households headed by men with similar levels of consumption.Using geographic information systems, we map out differences in mobile phone ownership between women-headed households and households headed by men.We selected a choropleth to indicate areas where the concentration of women's phones is higher.project. Survey data from the LSMS program that are included in the analysis here are from Uganda (2005, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, and 2018), Tanzania (2008, 2010-11, 2012-13, 2014, 2019), and Malawi (2004, 2010, 2013, 2016and 2019).Malawi has a large sample of publicly available LSMS data over a small geographic area which lends itself well to detailed analysis. In Malawi the sample size is large enough to estimate the price gap with extensive controls for specific crops and crop varieties such as hybrid corn vs traditional varieties.We pursued data from both Latin America and Southeast Asia to evaluate whether this hypothesis could be relevant in other areas rather than exclusive to sub-Saharan Africa. The two most conducive and comprehensive datasets with gender of the household head as well as transaction data were the Peruvian Encuesta for our analysis given the sample size and the level of detail in the data. In Peru, unlike in some parts of Africa and Southeast Asia, there do not appear to be a large variety of different buyers. In this case, this reduces the possibility that a price differential in these areas is caused by sorting effects, middle-chain purchasers and other intermediaries. Both the Malawian and Peruvian data are large enough to permit controls (fixed effects) for buyer and place of sale.Descriptive statistics of households headed by men contrasted with households headed by women can be found in Table 1. The top half of the table represents household characteristics while the bottom half corresponds to the individual characteristics of the household head. The key differences that appear are that women tend to have fewer adults in the household and, except in Bangladesh, tend to be older than men who are household heads. The average age of individuals other than the head is much lower for women than for men. We can also see that women clearly plant less land, which is one way they are able to maximize their use of resources. For certain countries we have included additional variables measuring area planted and net revenue per hectare, as well as area planted per adult equivalent. Net revenue per hectare is a measure of marketed surplus divided by total planted acres. This cannot exactly be equated with profit because, though expenses have been 'netted out,' there are other uses besides sales for crops such as consumption, in-kind contributions, using for seed and so on. Because of this, the marketed surplus value does not include the value of crop used for any of those other purposes. Furthermore, we have not made an effort to value the family labor by giving family members a wage. For our purposes this is sufficient, however, to capture how much return women are making on their land relative to male counterparts. Across all countries women make only a small fraction of what make in terms of net revenue per hectare. This is owing to the factors outlined above, a lack of access to men to engage in heavy physical labor, restricted access to inputs due to cost or working capital constraints and receiving a lower price than men who sell at market.Turning to the characteristics of the household head in all cases except Bangladesh the age of women household heads is older than that of household heads who are men. Men are, in all cases, more likely to own a mobile phone than women. In general, women household heads tend to have lower literacy rates and be less educated though the difference between men's education and women's educational attainment is smaller in some countries, like Bangladesh, and larger in others, like Malawi. A majority of the women-headed households list their marital status as divorced or widowed. Much fewer men than women fall into those categories while men mostly fall into the married category which itself is a of representation of the social status of men relative to women.Primary results from the price regressions are included in Table 2. Crop fixed-effects are included in all the columns, village fixed-effects are also included. Across all columns except for one there is a strong and statistically significant negative effect of being a woman on observed transaction prices. This is striking because it seems to be consistent, at least in sign, across countries and across continents. The most pronounced effect comes from Bangladesh where women appear to receive prices 40 percentage points lower than men.In Peru, there are three columns. The first column includes all observations for which a price is recorded. In columns 4 and 5 the sample is restricted to only those sales where the quantity is also recorded. Despite the fact that quantity sold was omitted for those 8,573 observations the unit price received at sale was included. Unit values for Peru were recorded for each transaction rather than unit values being backed out from the amount received divided by the quantity sold. Nonetheless, in column 3 for Peru there is a negative and statistically significant effect of the gender of the household head on the price received of about 7.8 log points. In Tanzania women and men tend to plant different crops. As such this is a reason, we might not achieve identification since there are not a woman household and a man household transacting in the same crop in the same village very frequently. Nonetheless at least in the specification including quantity sold, women headed households receive a 20% lower price relative to households headed by men selling the same crop in the same village. The negative effect of the household head being a woman on the transaction price appears to be consistently estimated, at least in sign and significance, for Bangladesh, Malawi and Uganda. In order to evaluate the presence of sorting effects and how they might influence the difference in price received by women and men, in one specification controls for buyer type and place of sale are included. These estimates can be found in Table 2. For each country, the original estimate without supplementary controls is represented in the left column while the estimate with the controls is on the right. In the case of Bangladesh,Malawi and Uganda including additional controls decreases the size of the coefficient on woman household head. This is consistent with the idea that sorting effects are contributing to the gender price gap.To further describe the nature of the price gap we also split the sample into permanent crops and annual crops and re-ran the regression model. If women are struggling more with annual crops, that might mean they are labor or otherwise resource constrained, or they may have lower quality land that yields poorer results. These regressions are included in Appendix Table A.1. In Uganda and Peru, the price gap is estimated to be larger for annual crops than for permanent crops. In fact, in the case of Peru the price gap is not detected at all for the permanent crops. This strongly suggests that in the case of Uganda and Peru it is likely that programs that target tree crops or permanent crops, which require less planting labor and less manual labor overall, could benefit womenThis section addresses whether or not men who are marketing crops may access different in-formational networks than women who marketing crops, a question which was raised based on the finding of asymmetric information between husbands and wives marketing crops in Zambia (Miura et al., 2020) and based on Mekonnen et al. (2018) 's findings using primary data on gendered informational networks. Another very recent paper by Haucap et al. (2022) finds that, in the formation of cartels women are all but excluded, also suggesting the presence of gender-influenced business networks or gender-based professional and social networks. We first analyze descriptive statistics of mobile ownership for different groups in the population. We then test whether the gender of the head influences the probability of mobile phone ownership. We regress the probability of mobile ownership on the share of phones in the village belonging to women. Areas where there are a higher ratio of women heads to men heads with phones are likely to have larger networks of women providing economic information to one another. Last, we present maps of the gap between men's and women's mobile phone ownership as well as survey evidence that women household heads use their mobile phones less than men household heads. In Table 3, descriptive statistics on mobile ownership are divided into households headed by men and households headed by women. The probability of owning a mobile phone is broken into three separate rows which are categories for levels of consumption per adult, low, medium and high consumption per adult equivalent. This allows us to compare women-headed households and households headed by men which are roughly similar in terms of level of consumption. The columns represent different concentrations of women household heads, low, medium and high concentration. As the concentration of women heads in the area goes up, so does the probability that a women household head will own a phone. The descriptive analysis is suggestive that when more women are around, women are more likely to purchase mobile phones since it also allows them to access to a larger informational network. Put differently, the marginal product of a woman owning a mobile phone is higher while the marginal product of owning a phone for men presumably does not change due to different concentrations of women household heads. Turning to the regression table, Table 4, each cell represents the regression of a mobile ownership dummy on the share of women household heads in a particular area. So, for example, in column 1, the first cell is the coefficient estimate for the effect of the share of women in the village on the probability of a household head who is a man. Column 2, cell 1 shows the same regression restricted to only women-household heads. Across the top are the different categories of consumption per adult equivalent. We can see that these effects persist across all levels of consumption per adult. This is highly indicative of the presence of gendered information networks which also implies asymmetric information.As the share of women's phones increases, women are more and more likely to have mobile phones as they benefit from having access to other women with phones. A larger share of women household heads with phones does not increase incentives for men who are household heads to have phones, which is what the coefficients show. Table 6 shows women's use of mobile phones in Peru. The women-headed households are divided into categories of income and three categories that represent the concentration of women's mobile phones. In areas where there's a higher share of women household heads with mobile phones, the marginal product of having a phone is higher as the network women potentially have access to is much larger. As we see, going down the rows in the low income and middle-income sections there is not much difference between low, medium and high concentration of women's phones. In general, women seem to prefer sending and receiving voice phone calls to sending SMS as they send very few SMS messages relative to the number of phone calls sent and received. The fact that, for the highest income category women in areas with a higher concentration of phones send and receive more phone calls lends additional evidence to the idea of the presence of gendered information networks in Peru. Policy solutions here depend on the context but the implications of a gender-based price wedge are significant. Women are facing a relatively more substantial barrier to improving their household's standard of living if they are facing this type of economic repression. One important implication is that many agricultural policies and projects might intend to assist women, but they have not resolved the price gap issue. This means that investments in, say, fertilizer, or composting will not benefit women in the same way it will benefit men who can capture a larger margin. For example, a recent paper Beaman and Dillon (2018) documents that women are isolated and less likely to benefit from the diffusion of agricultural information. While this alone is a sign of asymmetric information, consider that the diffusion does reach the women. The return on investment for composting and implementing other agricultural technologies is lower given that there is a price gap.Another paper recently evaluated the effect of business training programs on women entrepreneurs in Ethiopia (Bakhtiar et al., 2022). The authors found that the program training individuals in management practice yielded significant increases in profits for women entrepreneurs. It is worrisome that projects which are well-intended could be having a greatly diminished effect for women or they could be widening the gap between the well-being of women-headed households and households headed by men.If the context is primarily driven by social norms and customs, these views may not respond directly to economic incentives. In that case, then educational programs such as the one in Haryana state and updating individual's understanding of the importance of equal access to economic opportunities would be the best approach (Dhar et al., 2022). It may be a major challenge to shake loose long-held social customs that would open the door to women seeking expanded access to agricultural markets.The potential solutions to the asymmetric information scenario are quite evident. Would men voluntarily provide price data? Could we pay individuals to provide price data that would then be disseminated automatically (reducing the need for monitoring costs/managerial labor overhead)? Asymmetric information lends itself to solutions which offer transparency for all. However, most farmers do not yet have smartphones and some lack any phones at all. This lack of access to technology could be a major roadblock for any potential solution including reducing asymmetric information. We think this could be an interesting use-case for a blockchain solution which lists all agricultural transactions for certain crops in a particular area. Whatever the delivery system of new information, women-farmers need to be tapped in to information flows about prices and other agricultural activities. As another example, if the primary constraint for women is the capacity and time required to bring goods to market, then providing women with bicycles could reduce the cost of transporting their goods to and from market. A recent study found positive results of contributing bicycles to children to attend school. The bikes increased women's autonomy and empowerment (Moene et al., 2022).If the buyer is a key factor in sale/transaction price, meaning women get a fairer price from some buyers rather than others, this presents an interesting way of resolving the price discrepancy. One approach might then be empowering the buyers who originally provided the fairest prices (relatives and neighbors) rather than encouraging womenfarmers to work with new buyers who are potentially hostile to women.By analyzing household survey data from five countries across three continents, we conclude that women receive a lower unit price for agricultural goods sold at the market.This finding has implications for policy for food security, gender equality, and food security. Therefore, we argue that identifying the factors creating the gendered price wedge is crucial. To this end, we explored differences in price prediction error between men and women in times of low, average, and high rainfall and find that information flows appear to shift significantly during different states of nature. For women to remain food secure and invest in their farms and family, this significant barrier to income generation should be addressed. Potential remedies, e.g., providing women with market information via mobile phones, can effectively lead to gender equality."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3257007845.json b/main/part_2/3257007845.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d52a808b22581994c45eaaaaef8f3d1c144e7d51 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3257007845.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"7fa2d9a6-706a-4b54-ae77-903a5c718e56","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3262194863.json b/main/part_2/3262194863.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66c59d5e0c1264f21c40458913e9530bd916aaac --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3262194863.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"73a7174fc0ca847a8e3ef54cbd01014a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1a32a000-5d7a-4f29-ae5c-99152a54dd66/retrieve","id":"2084421473"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"895b2a13-0fb7-4547-a961-177cea15d31c","content":"The CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB) is working globally to harness the untapped potential of those crops in order to improve food security, nutrition, income and climate change resilience of smallholders, particularly women and youth. In many countries, RTB crops are strongly associated with women who produce and process them. Yet the benefits derived from the crops are often not equitably distributed between women and men due to unequal rights over resources, access to land and markets, information, technology and more.For example, women play very important roles in production, processing and marketing of cassava in Nigeria. Yet they have limited access to and control of production factors, such as arable land, seeds, fertilizers, credit and training 1 . Likewise, in Malawi, potato is a key cash and food crop for women, but they rarely receive relevant agronomic advice to improve their potato yields, which are half that of men's 2 .Innovations in RTB crops have tremendous impact on poverty reduction, improved food security and nutrition. The gender differences in roles, rights and responsibilities associated with RTB crops also makes it necessary to address gender inequities, confront household poverty and improve food security. A better understanding of the gender differentiated trait preferences of RTB crops can guide breeding programs to make informed decisions when prioritizing women's preferred varieties.The RTB gender strategy 3 provides the conceptual, implementation and monitoring guidance to ensure that gender is integrated into all aspects of research, development and uptake of new RTB technologies and practices.Integrated gender research based on interdisciplinary collaboration helps to improve collection, analysis and reporting of sex disaggregated data on key areas across the five RTB flagship projects (see brief Roots, Tubers and Bananas Research). • Emphasizes participatory processes -to enable adequate, gendered diagnosis of end-users' needs, monitor the deployment of new technologies and identify where project adjustments may be required in order to incorporate gender perspectives.• Draws knowledge through partnership -to partner with women's networks, self-help groups and gender alliances that are oriented on gender equity and women's empowerment issues and that promote gender-equitable approaches. Builds alliances with other projects and programs advancing gender and strengthening capacity of National Agricultural Research and Extension Systems on gender mainstreaming.• Fosters capacity development including through partnering with the GREAT initiative -to harmonize, strengthen and improve the overall understanding of concepts and processes of gender analysis and integration of gender-equity concerns in all areas of RTB.RTB's approach to gender provides an opportunity to build on existing integrated and strategic gender research by taking a more systematic approach and strengthening the capacity of in-house scientists, researchers, stakeholders and partners in this area. RTB is committed to mainstreaming gender across research, recognizing that this is essential to enhance impact and gender equity."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3302543269.json b/main/part_2/3302543269.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..25f6222e03dc74d0b8d296a056c7f52baa82906a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3302543269.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"722b48eb5ecc55063121b88661b62997","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9f68959a-550a-4588-a496-b7a66b2ccb2a/retrieve","id":"667969143"},"keywords":["'-","~f¡¡¡~;","otros pOr'tadoru da íótforo similar.::$' que t\"f!S[londcn hvc","ra.)::llcmente bAjo \\In am"],"sieverID":"ffb9911d-2257-4031-bcd5-8a3b79174860","content":"Localinción l!unidpic de Chine.hiná. Departatlu.'nto rJ(! 'Call! cu\\~J'\\.ta•co'n 1\" depósit()~ de R~,C-o\"?:~~~., , d, ~s cuales p(!rtono-:.cn a Colombia (1). \\ ! I I ... 1 .. ~ , cultivOs' Y.,fi'iatemas. de cu lti\\l'Ct~'lf\\Ie actua1.aK::nu' $e ~l.an ~n lo s suelos o\\c.!aoa inUtt,l1c's dQ 1. iml!rlü La'UnA tropical y subtro;-ic.'d. :l'l>{ se han euabtnddo un\" ud\", de CNayos d~ 'invornadero )' i'aD:po en Cólctl1t.ia en '~os C1,idu se han é.!.p~t'1mentacb rwcbas efe estas 'lE suutbl't\"icanas ., su. productos d. dtl\"!ra¿LSn ea';: el fin da averiguar su éfcetividad G.gronéinica con rclncidn a vorLu eultivoll. l{tlsta el presente muehos de 'estos po~tA'dore$ (te fÓlir~ro p4r~-een sc'r muy pt'Omi~ río .. y en algunQs enos 81:! han mos.trado aupf:'dorell al sn.3.• ReS\\tl~ados de la inve:st1.paÚán, . :En un CX,tlol de La, Gavi.,tu (t.,ll;ooS Oricntáles), se .ruUz6 un ~nu\" yo de ~nvernad~ro par~ ~ctq7a7~r la ~f<:ct.~vtdad agrot'l6m!ca de 18 roe .. fosfóri _ eas con' rolaci6n al sn. los ruu,l~,jI'do~ ~~, ~:sumll, de ere. ~otr:cs de ~ .:\" ' :1 . \\ L.:1a RFs q1Je se conocen por su alta rea:etivtdad, tlllt>s COtlb Carolina del l• Norte, Fosbayovítr y C.~fStl, s,e CQl!portan tan bit'n como (>1 rn. t'trns, co~ la, de Afd.ca del ,Sur. tlorida 7 I:l:\\lila, t-'~ranh,ao, Ar~d 'i r\",SC;t, tambi6n '):tre.:cn promi'-s:qrlJ1,s pan arli.cac:!ón dirftctll~ I,tn r.~~ral, 1c:' efectividAd d~ todM 1u rocas '~umentd con el incremento de 1u tItS~S de; fó.foro ,i 5e cetll!'ítrlH\" con ta ... .!Ills'iaualea de este elemento _rUcado eOlm; r-r:r:_ !n \\In C_/\"H;ltlmanto de eamfle conduc.ido en \\In oxh01 de C,~ntAl de: Cl ... !._('\\niUehao, ,,1 svr ti(!!l V!:lh del Cluea, se tetablcció un eJr.'\\.rll'!\\Cnto óe COl'\\:\"O ~tiliundo !raehhri.3 ,dacvmbcu;:, e~n (j1 obj:lO (\"(l, detcrmil'H d rn..:joc l!l!torkl ,¡~ ;:¡\"lieae:t6o rió.! fósforo CUtn:l f.'l'!!.• eol'ltln;!t'uio ¿o 1.Hff'~~t'!tos dos'is ~e ~! ~c r':Si.'O A:ít!endn 01 vol@ e i1,1::t'lt\"f)or1ld>1.1n un s1st;!tI'Ill d~ ?rnducci~n de forrt'jr.:s. LÓS t':,:sl!1tlldos. tou\\'> .~ fftUcstJ'}\\l'l en d. cU,,! ~ .. :~' d.:o:4 \"1 nv<: t'c?t'esl4ntan d•1tO;' a.culllUt,..c<)s \"'(1 :) eort~!J, S.H'I ,,1,.0 S<;lrp(p.ndcnt\"!.:!' en ~i•.l.ent:ldc 4e q~e ~a aP.Ucad~n <10 la ,~;. de \"dsea ctJt4'pt'Orlu):::l('1nuo el'nto' fonaje ' \\ neo 0011'1) .el ,r.FT~ ~olo a en combin;¡ción c~n la ~!,'. J:an\"ién ~s, <:ln~Qra.l~nt(! <,,:r>~tar :'(.; que la. Rr app~Ii¿s. su1'orfid .... lncnto sLn h'u!Qr\"'lo'!\":¡r .>\\1 'i:\\t~•lo estA .d¡~ndo ':-OlJ:lltn • '<~~! do. eQl'!fI4rabhs con lQ$ demás t•r:lt\"micPt('\\~. €Sf;Q t\"~rect: l'ltlícoilr, {I,..¡ \"¡¡,,,m,aa Rl\"¡¡ csto'l.D!Cr.:f .. , C\\J~ndc esC¡;¡ e:x!\".!r! ... nto se .:sttLbl¡nifloUvS's c<:. fósforo dlZl todl!ll' ht: ;irs y hu Tc\"di-. clentos del erroz fueron cotr.t';\\rolbl.-s con tl.!,l1eneionc. dm.laru úq fódQfO como ~n.lh.\"do~Bt'.qchhda dccumb-.:!ns~ ócs.\"tl\\!S I1c 5ds corte. dt: ct.ta f,l'llll'lÍnl.:a. los rc'\\dt-\" m4ntos fUH'on eQmp.,raLl.~'$ con los-, 'eritM Rrr~t.l fI:lr;t ..:1 at'ro: Profile in the Menu. If you wish to update your profile information, please send an email to agrofims@cgiar.org.In this section you can describe the experimental site and its surroundings.1. Select Site > Create in the Menu. 2. Fill the information about the site type, site name, country name and administrative divisions using text boxes and picklists as appropriate. You can zoom in the map to help you find the name of your location, but you cannot use the map to directly pinpoint the site. 3. Once you have filled the information about the site and the site is pinpointed on the map, click at the bottom left of the page.1. In the Menu, go to Fieldbook > Create.2. Go to the section Site.3. Under Site information, select the country of the experimental site and the site name.I don't find my site.1. In the Menu, go to Fieldbook > Create > Site.2. Under Site information, if the site doesn't appear in the site list, click on Refresh.3. If the site is still absent from the list, you can check the sites list by clicking on Site > Manage in the Menu. 4. If the site is not listed here, it may not have been saved during its creation. You may create the site again by selecting Site > Create in the Menu.The site ID is a unique identifier automatically generated by AgroFIMS to distinguish the sites in your sites list.1. Go to Site> Manage in the Menu.2. Click on next to the site you want to get information about.1. Go to Site> Manage in the Menu.2. Click on next to the site you want to delete.A site cannot be updated. You must create a new site.This section is dedicated to the description of the crops cultivated in the experiment.1. Select the type of cropping system of your experiment. Currently the choices are: Monocrop, Intercrop or Relay crop. 2. Select the crop's common name. If the crop is not listed, select ''Other'' and specify the crop common name. If \"Intercrop\" or \"Relay crop\" are selected, AgroFIMS will require you to add at least 2 crops. To add more, click on \"add crop\". 3. Enter the variety name. You can enter as many varieties as needed.It is not currently possible to import a list of varieties or genotypes. You have to manually enter your list in the text box: Variety name(s)Fieldbook ID is a unique identifier created by AgroFIMS to identify your experiment. It is made of the concatenation of the following information: F_Cropping type_Crop name_Experiment start date_Country. \"F\" stands for Fieldbook in this case.In this section you can specify the design of the experiment and its treatments, levels etc.1. Select the experimental design of your experiment using the drop-down list 2. Select the experimental unit (plot, field, pot) 3. Enter the size of the experimental unit selected 4. Select a unit to express the size of the experimental unit using the dropdown listIt is not possible to design an experiment with only one replication, thus, AgroFIMS requires that you add at least two replications. Currently AgroFIMS does not allow data collection from demonstration experiments and farmer surveys, which may not be replicated. This capability will be developed in v.2.0.A treatment is a combination of factor levels. A factor is a controlled independent variable whose levels are set by the experimenter. Each factor has two or more levels (i.e. two or more different values) 2 .1. Specify the number of treatments and repetitions (or blocks) 2. Select a factor in the list . If the factor is not listed, select ''Other'' and specify the name of the factor. 3. Enter the levels of the factor 4. To add another factor, click on \"Add factor\" 5. For the CRD and RCBD designs, define the treatments by assembling the factors and their levels using the dropdown menus at the bottom of the page.1. Scroll the dropdown menu or start typing the name of the factor; AgroFIMS will narrow down possibilities for you . The factors have been listed using broader categories. This means that if you want to test different amounts of urea, the factor you should select is \"Fertilizer amount\". If you want to test different potato varieties, the factor will be \"Crop variety\". 2. If the factor is not in the list, select ''Other'' and write in the name of the factor in the text box, select the type of input, the unit if needed, and the levels.To allow a wide range of treatments, some factors have been grouped together. For example, the irrigation amount factor has been grouped with the irrigation type factor. This way it is possible to compare different types of irrigation with different amounts (Sprinkler 200ml versus Drip Irrigation 300ml).Note: This is the case for mulch, fertilizer, irrigation, weeding product, crop residue, nutrient element, biotic stress, biotic stress control product.For these factors:1. Select the factor in the list 2. Specify the type of factor 3. Enter the level and their units 4. Click ''add type'', if you need to add another type of the same factorFor this factor you have the possibility to calculate the nutrient amount that will be applied to the field and to specify the management practices.1. Select \"Fertilizer type and amount\" in the factor list.2. Once you have specified the fertilizer type, levels and number of application splits, click on AGROFIMS VERSION1 USER MANUAL| 13 3. A pop-up window will appear. If it is blank, click on 4. Check if the \"Nutrient content in product\" data corresponds to your fertilizer product. Modify the nutrient content in the product if needed. 5. Specify the fertilizer application timing, and the technique and traction used to apply the fertilizer.6. Click on to get the amount of nutrient that will be applied in the field for each level. This information will be displayed in the Protocol tab of the Excel fieldbook and in Trial attributes in KDSmart. Note that this is currently calculated on a per hectare basis; you will need to use this to calculate the amount required for the area over which you are applying the fertilizer.For this factor you have the possibility to calculate the amount of product to be applied in the field and to specify the management practices.1. Select \"Nutrient type and amount\" in the factor list.2. Once you have specified the type, levels and number of splits, click on 3. If the pop-up window is empty, click on 4. Specify the fertilizer product application timing, the technique and traction that will be used to apply the product. 5. Select the product to apply from the list. If the product is not listed, select ''Generic fertilizer''. 6. Check if the \"Nutrient content in product\" data corresponds to your fertilizer product. Modify the nutrient content in the product if needed.7. Click on to get the amount of product that must be applied in the field to get the level of nutrient desired. This information will be displayed in the Protocol tab of the Excel fieldbook and in Trial attributes in KDSmart. Note that this is currently calculated on a per hectare basis; you will need to use this to calculate the amount required for the area over which you are applying the fertilizer.Once you have filled information in the Design tab you can click at the bottom right on the page to get a preview of the fieldbook with plot numbers and the treatment assigned to them.In this section you can describe the experimental protocol.1. Select the management practices that will be implemented in the field 2. Fill the information for each of them.The information filled in this section will be exported in the tab Protocol of the Excel file, and will be listed under Trial attributes in KDSmart.If you wish to get information about a management practice that will be done in the field, like the date of sowing or the depth of tillage:1. Select the management practice. 2. Select the management practice to be noted in the field in the box ''To be collected in the field''.Currently, AgroFIMS doesn't allow users to create their own management practices as this would defeat the goal of harmonizing data among experiments. However, we understand that some management practices may be missing from the current lists. Please contact us at agrofims@cgiar.org if you would like to discuss terms or practices you feel should be in AgroFIMS.In this section you can select and describe the measurements to be made on the crops.1. Select a measurement in the drop-down list. You can either scroll through the list or delete the default and type the name of the measurement -the auto-complete feature will select the term if the measurement is in the list. 2. If the drop-down list is empty, it may be that you have forgotten to select a crop. Verify that you have selected a crop in the Crop section. 3. Once you have found your measurement, select it and click on Add measurement. The measurement will be added to the list of measurements for this experiment.4. Indicate on which part of the plant the measurement will be done (parameter measured ), the unit of measurement , the number of times it has to be measured during the season how many samples have to be taken per plot each time and the measurement timing. 5. You can add as many crop measurements as needed.This section is dedicated to the selection of weather measurements to make during the experiment.1. Select a measurement in the drop-down list. You can either scroll through the list or delete the default and type the name of your measurement -the auto-complete feature will select the term if the measurement is in the list.2. Once you have found your measurement, select it and click on . The measurement will be added to the list of measurements for this experiment. 3. You can then indicate its unit, the number of times it has to be measured during the season, and its timing. 4. You can add as many weather measurements as needed.To remove a measurement, click on the cross at the upper right side of the measurement box.This section is dedicated to the selection of soil measurements to make during the experiment.1. Select a measurement in the drop-down list. You can either scroll through the list or delete the default and type the name of your measurement -the auto-complete feature will select the term if the measurement is in the list.2. Once you have found your measurement, select it and click on . The measurement will be added to the list of measurements for this experiment.3. You can then indicate its unit, the depth of the measurement, the number of times it has to be measured during the season, and its timing. 4. You can add as many soil measurements as needed.To remove a measurement, click on the cross at the upper right side of the measurement box.Fieldbooks created in AgroFIMS are saved in the \"Manage\" section of the left-hand panel in AgroFIMS. These saved fieldbooks can be opened for editing.1. Select Fieldbook > Manage in the Menu 2. If you don't see any fieldbook or if you don't find the one you are looking for, click on Refresh 3. It can take some minutes for the experiment to appear in the list. If the experiment is not listed after some time, you can contact us at agrofims@cgiar.org.1. Select Fieldbook > Manage in the Menu. 2. Select the fieldbook you wish to duplicate/edit. Once selected, the fieldbook is highlighted in blue. 3. Click on Edit 4. The fieldbook will be opened in AgroFIMS ready to be edited. To duplicate a fieldbook, modify the experiment name and/or the experiment site and click on Save. 5. Currently, AgroFIMS is not able to save items selected in the dropdown lists. You will have to refill them. We apologize for the inconvenience. We are working on this feature for the next release.To use AgroFIMS fieldbooks with a mobile data collection tool you need to export the fieldbook in a format readable by the mobile application. Currently AgroFIMS is only compatible with the Android mobile application KDSmart.1. To export your fieldbook, select Fieldbook > Export in the Menu.2. In the list of fieldbook, select the one to export.3. If the fieldbook does not appear in the list, click 4. Click 5. A .kdx file will be downloaded to your laptop.6. You can send this file to the data collector or transfer it to the device where KDSmart is installed (via email, a cloud or a direct USB transfer).You can visualize the fieldbook created in AgroFIMS in an Excel file.1. Select Fieldbook > Export on the Menu. 2. In the list of fieldbooks, select the one you wish to export.3. If your fieldbook does not appear in the list, click 4. Click 5. An Excel file will be downloaded to your laptop.In KDSmart the plots can be named either by their number or by the number of their column, row and block.1. Download a trial (cf. KDSmart tutorial).2. Click on the three dots at the top left.3. Select \"Trials\". 7. Select \"Full data\" in Zip.8. Select the folder where you want to store this file 9. Click \"Select Download''.-Via email: from the mobile device, send an email to yourself with the .zip file attached. Open this email on a laptop and download the .zip file.-Via a cloud: on the mobile device, save the .zip file on a cloud-based service (OneDrive, Dropbox, Google Drive). Open the same cloud-based service on a laptop and download the .zip file.-Via USB transfer: connect the mobile device to a laptop. Save the .zip file on the laptop."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3356021359.json b/main/part_2/3356021359.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83bf5ab765f3ae6f6ec726455708b17738a83406 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3356021359.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"869ad0d91f2d9f05de87d5d3c16c051d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/037c5394-81a2-4779-abb7-56859729b002/retrieve","id":"1310494335"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"da3b66fc-f08e-4307-88ac-3f0b3ec3eccc","content":"Los cultivos de gran diversidad como el maíz, fríjol y papa incluyen muchas variedades de alto valor público nacional y global, aunque solo algunas tienen sus valores privados reconocidos por los mercados. Esto afecta el estado de conservación de las variedades, el que va desde no estar en riesgo dada la aceptación del mercado, a aquellas con potencial de mercado a desarrollarse, y finalmente aquellas en riesgo de desaparecer de los campos de los agricultores.Se ha ensayado una solución innovadora para este dilema de provisión de bienes públicos, llamada ReSCA, Recompensas por los Servicios de Conservación de la Agrobiodiversidad (ver Cuadro 1). ReSCA usa los conceptos probados de pagos por servicios ecosistémicos, PSE, y los aplica a la gestión de la agrobiodiversidad, recompensando a los agricultores por cultivar un portafolio prioritario de especies/variedades, facilitando el acceso a recursos genéticos en riesgo, contribuyendo a la puesta en práctica de los derechos de los agricultores, y a la distribución equitativa de los beneficios de su utilización. Así, se propicia la diversificación de las estrategias de medios de vida de los agricultores, al añadir a la producción agrícola beneficios por la provisión de servicios públicos de la agrobiodiversidad.2Las aplicaciones exitosas de ReSCA a pequeña escala en varios países han revelado que una limitación importante para la ampliación de las intervenciones es el acceso limitado de los agricultores a las semillas de variedades amenazadas. La semilla de ciertas variedades de cultivos tradicionales puede ser imposible de obtener (por ser tan rara), a pesar del hecho que los agricultores están dispuestos a cultivarla. Algunas veces, el interés de los productores por las variedades amenazadas es tan alto que no se requieren pagar recompensas del tipo ReSCA; únicamente se requiere facilitar acceso a la semilla. En otros casos, las semillas están disponibles en cantidades tan pequeñas que se requieren varias temporadas agrícolas para multiplicarlas en cantidades suficientes para alcanzar las metas de conservación en cuanto a áreas sembradas. Este es un esfuerzo de varios años de actividades de purificación, multiplicación, almacenamiento y mecanismos de intercambio, con desafíos para financiar tales actividades. Es en este contexto que los bancos comunitarios de semillas pueden proporcionar una plataforma crítica para integrar mecanismos de incentivos para la conservación a nivel comunitario como ReSCA, abordar la escasez actual de alguna semilla, y el manejo postcosecha de semillas de alto valor público, mientras se fortalece el papel que ya tienen en la promoción de la conservación de la agrobiodiversidad.Aquí presentamos los resultados preliminares de la Sierra de los Cuchumatanes, Huehuetenango en Guatemala. Se revelan la importancia de los mecanismos de incentivos basados en los conceptos de PSE para apoyar la gestión de los recursos genéticos por las propias comunidades y las importantes funciones que los bancos comunitarios de semilla pueden desempeñar en este contexto.Cuadro 1: Como funciona el Mecanismo de Incentivos ReSCA?Bajo ReSCA, los agricultores son recompensados por el cultivo de recursos genéticos amenazados de alto valor público. Los incentivos se ofrecen a nivel comunitario e involucran concursos competitivos a nivel comunitario. Grupos de productores en diferentes comunidades definen sus condiciones de participación, es decir, qué especies/variedades se deben cultivar a partir de un portfolio prioritario predeterminado, y el tipo y nivel de recompensa que necesitan para cubrir sus costos de oportunidad de participar. Se utilizan los criterios de eficiencia y equidad social, incluyendo género, para seleccionar a las comunidades con las ofertas más atractivas, idealmente hasta el punto en que se alcancen los objetivos de conservación, pero en la práctica más comúnmente hasta el punto en que el presupuesto de conservación se gasta por completo. Los objetivos de conservación se basan en una combinación de (i) áreas cultivadas por raza/variedad-relacionado con el mantenimiento de la diversidad, el flujo de genes y los procesos evolutivos-así como (ii) número de agricultores que las cultivan -relacionado con el conocimiento tradicional y las prácticas culturales-y (iii) número de comunidades -relacionado con la distribución espacial y la resiliencia del paisaje-. Una vez que se han seleccionado las comunidades y se han distribuido las semillas, se realizan visitas de verificación/monitoreo en momentos clave de la temporada agrícola, lo que también brinda oportunidades para que los servicios de extensión brinden asistencia técnica y capacitación, como en la selección de semillas de calidad. Al final de la cosecha se retiene un pequeño porcentaje (generalmente 2-5%) de ésta como semilla para distribuir a otros agricultores en los años siguientes. Las recompensas en especie y definidas por los propios agricultores incluyen, por ejemplo, insumos agrícolas, materiales de construcción y ú ti le s escolares, y son entregados en una ceremonia formal. Estas ceremonias han brindado oportunidades para eventos de alta visibilidad, con la participación de Viceministros y jefes de instituciones nacionales y locales, así apoyando la integración de la agrobiodiversidad en las políticas y estrategias de conservación nacional y local.Mesoamérica es uno de los principales centros de domesticación y diversificación de especies alimenticias en el mundo. Entre ellos, el maíz, que constituye no sólo la base de la dieta sino de la identidad cultural de muchos países de la región, el frijol, importante fuente de proteína vegetal, hortalizas, frutales y raíces como: los chiles, el amaranto, las calabazas, el aguacate, la papaya, el camote y la yuca. La conservación y el uso sostenible de los recursos fitogenéticos de estas, y otros cultivos nativos junto con sus parientes silvestres, son claves para la adaptación de la agricultura no sólo en la región sino también en los demás países que dependen de cultivos de origen mesoamericano para su seguridad alimentaria (Ramirez et al., 2014 1 ).La Sierra de los Cuchumatanes, donde se implementa el proyecto, es un área con alta diversidad de cultivos de importancia para la seguridad alimentaria, centro de origen primario del maíz (véase Foto 1) y fríjol, y centro de origen secundario de la papa. La densidad poblacional del territorio es de 153 habitantes/km 2 , con una extensión territorial de 1,200 km², en donde convergen ocho de los 23 grupos étnicos existentes en Guatemala. Estos grupos, K'iches, Chalchitecos, Awakatekos, Mestizos, Mames, Akateko, Chuj y Q'anjob'al, los que han sido desplazados y confinados en territorios específicos, y categorizados como minorías, en donde sus derechos son opacados. La tasa de analfabetismo medio es de 52% y el Índice de Desarrollo Humano es del 0.48. La desnutrición crónica es de 74% y el 86% de la población vive en pobreza y pobreza extrema. La vulnerabilidad a cambio climático es alta, debido a la topografía accidentada con porcentajes de pendiente media del 60% y una variabilidad climática extrema.Cada uno de los bancos comunitarios de semillas (son 18, véase Figura 1) se encuentra vinculado a una asociación y/o cooperativa de productores, bajo la gobernanza de un comité local; estos brindan los servicios de recuperación de agrobiodiversidad, resguardo de variedades nativas en caja negra (propiedad del productor) y resguardo de variedades para casos de emergencia.Figura 1: Red de Reservas Comunitarias de Semillas en el área de acción de ASOCUCHLas primeras etapas de ReSCA empezaron hacia finales de 2017, iniciándose con el proceso de priorización de que conservar.El primer paso de la priorización (Figura 2) es definir un portafolio prioritario para la conservación, ya que hay muchos recursos genéticos amenazados pero los recursos económicos para conservarlos son limitados. Así tenemos que elegir cuidadosamente los más \"importantes\" (bajo varios criteriosvéase abajo) para conservar. Con la finalidad de identificar las variedades más amenazadas se aplicó el método 4Celdas (Sthapit et al., 2006 3 ), un método participativo para identificar los recursos genéticos más importantes dentro de una comunidad a través de un análisis de la cantidad y distribución de las variedades bajo cultivo. Con esta información se pueden identificar los recursos genéticos más raros, sus amenazas y empezar a desarrollar planes de conservación.Como parte de este proceso, se realizaron 10 talleres comunitarios involucrando a 147 agricultores (86 hombres y 61 mujeres) de 10 bancos comunitarios de semillas que cubren un total de 30 comunidades agrícolas de los municipios de Chiantla, Aguacatán, San Juan Ixcoy, Santa Eulalia, Todos Santos Cuchumatan, Concepción Huista y Santiago Petatán. Los participantes fueron invitados a traer muestras de las diferentes variedades de maíz, fríjol y papa al taller. Al inicio del taller, se dibujó una matriz 4Celdas (véase Figura 3) en un papel grande en el piso, en el medio de todos los participantes. Luego se explicó el significado de cada celda (en nuestro caso había nueve y no cuatro celdas, para conseguir información más detallada) y se desarrolló un entendimiento común de la terminología \"mucho\" (>75% del área o número de productores en la comunidad), \"medio\" (>25 hasta <75%) y \"poco\" (<25%). Trabajando por cultivo, cada productor fue invitado a poner cada una de sus muestras en las celdas que ellos consideraron más apropiadas y a partir de una discusión se documentaron las razones para la colocación de las variedades en cada celda, incluyendo los valores de uso hasta llegar a un consenso con los otros participantes, el que abarcaba también el nombre de la variedad. Cuando no hubo muestras de todas las variedades conocidas por la comunidad, se utilizó un papel con el nombre de la variedad (véase Foto 2).Para profundizar sobre las variedades que se encuentran cultivadas por pocos hogares en pocas áreas (celda derecha inferior -Figura 3 4), se buscó ordenar solo éstas en términos del grado de riesgo, a través de la identificación más precisa respecto a cuantas áreas y cuantos productores estaban involucrados en su cultivo (véase Foto 3 4).Agregando los resultados de los 10 talleres, un total de 72 variedades fueron identificadas como cultivadas por pocos hogares en pocas áreas (celda derecha inferior). Estas 72 variedades fueron entonces sujetas a un ordenamiento utilizando una serie de criterios, que incluyeron: presencia en más de uno de los municipios entrevistados; grado de disimilitud (distinto de otros materiales); importancia en términos de seguridad alimentaria (disponibilidad, acceso, uso y estabilidad), nutricional, sociocultural y para adaptación al cambio climático; vulnerabilidad a factores abióticos/bióticos (cambio climático, nuevas enfermedades, plagas) y potencial comercial. Cada factor recibió un valor de 1 (bajo) a 5 (alto), cada uno con un peso igual, por un grupo de expertos, agricultores y técnicos vinculados a los bancos comunitarios de semillas.Como resultado (Tabla 1, p.6), se identificaron ocho variedades de maíz y seis de frijol con un alto nivel de riesgo y se priorizaron para una intervención. Estas ocupaban un área total de apenas 1.56 hectáreas (o 1,230m 2 en promedio por variedad, cultivadas en promedio por 4.2 productores); con algunas que consistían en solo unas matitas o cultivadas por solo 1-2 productores. Todas las variedades fueron clasificadas por los propios productores en términos de áreas cultivadas y el número de productores involucrados como \"muy, muy poco\", fuera del maíz pinto que fue clasificado como \"muy poco\"Mientras que todavía se tiene que desarrollar un consenso respecto a la definición de una meta de conservación/umbral de riesgo para variedades de maíz y frijol en los Cuchumatanes; en comparación con estimados en otros países, estas variedades están muy por debajo de una meta de 5 ha. cultivadas por variedad y distribuidas entre 50-100 productores.Subetapa 1c: Disponibilidad de semillas suficientes de los recursos genéticos amenazados para la intervención Luego de identificar las 14 variedades prioritarias, se empezó un proceso de identificación de disponibilidad de semillas, lo que anteriormente ha sido una limitante fuerte en otras experiencias ReSCA en otros países. Se siguieron dos estrategias:a) Proveer apoyo a productores que tenían semilla de las variedades prioritarias. Tomando como base la experiencia que posee ASOCUCH en el tema, desde junio 2017 (considerando que las fechas de siembra en la Sierra de los Cuchumatanes se inician en febrero y concluyen en mayo de cada año) se inició la búsqueda de las variedades entre las áreas ya sembradas para acopiar semilla disponible para la siembra del concurso ReSCA. Del total de semillas necesarias para el concurso, aproximadamente 50% se compró a productores no concursantes que le poseían y el 50% restante fue proporcionada por los mismos productores concursantes.b) Feria y Campaña Más Buscados. Durante la IX Feria de Agrobiodiversidad realizada en el mes de noviembre 2017 a donde asistieron más de 2,000 agricultores de la Sierra de los Cuchumatanes, se lanzó la Campaña de los Más Buscados, generando un afiche (véase Figura 4) que mostraba las variedades prioritarias e informando a los representantes de los bancos comunitarios de semillas sobre los resultados obtenidos en los talleres realizados previamente. Esta campaña permitió que agricultores de otras comunidades pudieran ubicar los materiales y facilitar la compra por el proyecto de por lo menos unas cinco variedades de las más raras.Durante los talleres de priorización se anunció el concurso, se explicó cómo participar, se indicó el apoyo en la elaboración de ofertas informadas y se hizo la selección de ofertas. Se recibieron 11 propuestas con un valor total de aproximadamente USD7,850 (Q.57,285) involucrando 11 de las 14 variedades prioritarias, provenientes de siete comunidades y 102 productores. El rango del valor de las ofertas fue entre USD 819 -2,485/ha p.a. (Tabla 2, p.8) Dado que el presupuesto total para recompensas fue limitado a USD6,650 (Q.48,535) se utilizó un modelo de programación lineal para maximizar tanto el área bajo conservación como la equidad (fondos de conservación distribuidos a lo largo del mayor número de productores/as y comunidades posibles). Como resultado solo fue posible seleccionar y hacer contratos con 6 de las comunidades, involucrando 90 productores, de los cuales 33% fueron mujeres y cubriendo solo 9 de las 11 variedades que recibieron ofertas. Las etapas 6-10 de entrega de semillas [véase Fotos 4 y 5], visitas de apoyo, monitoreo y verificación fueron todas realizadas durante los meses de enero a mayo 2018 por los técnicos de ASOCUCH. Estas visitas incluyeron asistencia técnica a 150 agricultores en los procesos de cosecha y clasificación de semillas.Una ceremonia de entrega de recompensas y reconocimiento del trabajo de los agricultores involucrados en el RESCA fue realizada en junio 2018 durante la III Feria de Agrobiodiversidad en Todos Santos Cuchumatán, con participación de más de 600 agricultores de la Sierra de los Cuchumatanes (véase Fotos 6 y 7). Las recompensas solicitadas por las propias comunidades (y por condición del contrato ReSCA, solo en especie) incluyeron fertilizantes, insecticidas, fungicidas, toneles plásticos con tapa y materiales de construcción. También se aprovechó de la presencia de los agricultores en el evento para realizar un taller con los representantes de los grupos que concursaron. En el taller se obtuvo información postcosecha respecto a la percepción de los productores y la importancia de las variedades amenazadas en su alimentación, el desempeño de las variedades comparadas a lo que comúnmente siembran (en términos de sabor, cocción, rendimiento, preferencias de consumo, resistencia a plagas y enfermedades, y potencial comercial), al grado en que ellos han compartido la semilla con otros, los beneficios logrados (fuera de las recompensas en sí) y su evaluación del proyecto ReSCA. Los resultados fueron muy positivos (el 7% de la cosecha se guardó como semilla para sembrar de nuevo y el 100% de los productores expreso en la evaluación que participaría otra vez en experiencias ReSCA) -también véase una entrevista video 4 con uno de los productores.4 Parte 1: https://1drv.ms/v/s!Al7d_1L8pQXLhKNWp5LvlGAp7VdO-gParte 2: https://1drv.ms/v/s!Al7d_1L8pQXLhKNXc1u6E82cHggqNQ Al final de la campaña se cosecharon casi 6,200 libras de siete de las nueve variedades con contratos ReSCA, las otras dos variedades, maíz crema y frijol negro de enredo, fueron afectadaos por la sequía. De la cosecha, 77% fue destinada para consumo propio, 7% guardado como semilla para uso propio la que en la siguiente temporada se plantó en 3.8 ha, más las 48 libras que estos mismos agricultores proporcionaron a otros productores nuevos que fueron suficientes para cubrir 0.4 ha adicionales y finalmente el 15% entregado a los bancos comunitarios de semillas, los que distribuyeron semilla a otros productores afiliados, suficiente semilla para cubrir 8ha.Así, después de dos temporadas, el mecanismo ReSCA ha resultado en aumentar el área bajo cultivo de estas variedades de 1.6 ha. hasta 12.2 ha. (3.8+0.4+8), o sea un aumento del 780% en términos de área (véase la foto de cubierta).A pesar del hecho que todavía estas variedades prioritarias para la conservación se encuentran lejos del umbral de \"no estar en riesgo\", hay buenas perspectivas que el área total cultivada bajo estas variedades y el número de productores involucrados continuarán creciendo a través de la diseminación de semilla a nuevos productores sin pago de recompensas. En este sentido, es interesante notar que durante la X Feria de Agrobiodiversidad (noviembre 2018), se colocó un stand con muestras de los seis bancos comunitarios de semillas que produjeron las nueve variedades de maíz y frijol que fueron priorizadas y reproducidas por los agricultores, logrando distribuir a 234 agricultores muestras de semillas (100 semillas) de las variedades siguientes: 64 agricultores recibieron maíz rojo negro, 59 agricultores recibieron maíz salpor, 62 agricultores recibieron maíz pinto y 49 agricultores recibieron maíz negro de 4 meses (véase Fotos 8 -10). Con esta acción se inició otro proceso de diseminación de semillas raras y apreciadas por los agricultores, las cuales poseen tolerancia a condiciones climáticas extremas, buenos rendimientos, características de aceptabilidad como buen sabor y que por algún motivo se han perdido y/o disminuido su presencia en el área de acción de los bancos de semillas.1. Nuestra iniciativa de ReSCA en el contexto de instituciones de acción colectiva bien desarrolladas con experiencia en el manejo de sistemas de semillas ha demostrado claramente el potencial para superar muchos de los desafíos respecto el manejo de la semilla que ReSCA ha enfrentado en otros lugares. El resultado en esta fase inicial ha sido un aumento significativo en el área bajo variedades amenazadas (780% en dos temporadas agrícolas), además del desarrollo de las capacidades locales respecto a la conservación de los recursos genéticos.No obstante, en los Cuchumatanes se requiere continuar con ReSCA durante los próximos años para consolidar el trabajo existente y expandirlo a las otras variedades amenazadas que se identificaron a través del Método de 4Celdas. Las metas de conservación para las 14 variedades (de las cuales solo 7 se han cultivado exitosamente bajo ReSCA hasta el momento) que se identificaron como una prioridad para la intervención inicial 2017/18 aún no se ha logrado. Además, hace falta expandir del mecanismo de incentivos para incluir las otras 58 variedades de maíz, fríjoles y papa identificadas como en riesgo. La capacitación en el enfoque ReSCA también debe proporcionarse a los agentes de extensión del gobierno fuera del área inmediata de operación de ASOCUCH, con miras a apoyar una ampliación del ámbito de implementación tanto en el Departamento de Huehuetenango como en Guatemala en general.Para complementar este esfuerzo ASOCUCH tiene planes de proporcionar al banco nacional de germoplasma ICTA (Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Agrícolas) 2.2 libras de cada variedad rescatada, junto con los datos de pasaporte relacionados, para garantizar la existencia de un respaldo almacenado a largo plazo. Así, otro beneficio de ReSCA es apoyar la complementariedad entre las estrategias de conservación in situ -ex situ al permitir que los bancos comunitarios de semilla proporcionen materiales raros a las colecciones nacionales que podrían no haberse descubierto bajo misiones de colecta convencionales. Esta función de los bancos comunitarios de semilla como una fuente potencial de materiales raros resalta la importancia de los sistemas locales de semillas y la necesidad de continuar con el proceso de cabildeo político con el Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación para su reconocimiento y apoyo. Esta intervención es parte del programa de trabajo de Bioversity International sobre Economía de la Conservación y Uso Sostenible de los Recursos Genéticos en colaboración con La Asociación de Organizaciones de los Cucumatanes (ASOCUCH) y los bancos de semillas de productores de las siguientes organizaciones: Cooperativa Joya Hermosa de las Tres Cruces R.L. (Banco de Semillas Climentoro), Asociación ADAT (Banco de Semillas Chanchimil), Asociación ADIPY (Banco de Semillas Secheu), Asociación AMEDIPK (Banco de Semillas Paijala), Asociación ICUZONDEHUE (Banco de Semillas San Francisco las Flores) y la Cooperativa Axola (Banco de Semillas Petatán). Esta investigación se realizó como parte de, y fue financiada por, el Programa de Investigación de CGIAR sobre Politicas, Instituciones y Mercados y fue apoyada por contribuyentes al Fondo Fiduciario del CGIAR. Tambien fue financiada por el Fondo de Desarrollo de Noruega y a USC Canadá. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3359438566.json b/main/part_2/3359438566.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0dfc81b97e436782921018d2b7e9cce3602ad088 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3359438566.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3f78e56c61f27fedc3aa20cc7c1c64f9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c9b6d9d5-c831-497a-b163-98cc2be2d52c/retrieve","id":"-715303743"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b1b1c657-ea27-4f35-a18b-94165834b587","content":"Memorandum of Agreement was signed between the Government of Odisha and WorldFish that formed a collaboration between WorldFish and the Fisheries & Animal Resources Development (FARD) Department. As per the terms of the agreement, WorldFish would provide technical support to the FARD Department from July 2016 to March 2022 in order to implement the government's Odisha Fisheries Policy (2015) across the state of Odisha.Sustainable aquaculture and fisheries in Odisha, India, through technical collaboration with the Fisheries and Animal Resources Development DepartmentFisheries and Animal Resources Development Department, Government of Odisha, IndiaJuly 2016-March 2022Government GIFT Tilapia hatchery, Kausalyaganga (left), GIFT Tilapia seed (right).Approximately 9229 women SHGs received training and farmgate extension services on nutrition-sensitive fish farming in Gram Panchayat (GP) tanks on longterm leases. This helped empower more than 92,000 women members of the SHGs under Mission Shakti by increasing their incomes through the sale of large carps and through household consumption of small indigenous fish, specifically mohurali (mola). On average, the SHGs are now making a net annual income of INR 154,000/ha from farming fish in the GP tanks.2. In 2020, in collaboration with PFCS/SHGs, the Government of Odisha rolled out an investor friendly, and socially equitable and environmentally sound, \"single window clearance\" policy for fish farmers, private entrepreneurs, and companies to undertake cage culture in reservoirs. A total of 101 sub-zones were allotted to 96 entrepreneurs for them to take up cage culture on a \"lease-install-operate\" basis in the Hirakud reservoir and, two years later, the entrepreneurs had installed 213 cages (69 circular cages in 23 subzones and 144 rectangular cages in 6 subzones). WorldFish supported the effort by providing them with support in adopting technology for commercial-scale cage culture. Overall, reservoir cage culture in Odisha has the potential to add as much as 125,000 t of fish to the state's fish basket.3. In all 138 reservoirs of the state, the program made reservoir fingerling stocking and fish production more efficient and effective by using a community-based, co-management approach and strictly implementing standard operating procedures. This empowered local fishers with greater fish catches from reservoirs and improved household incomes and nutrition. In addition, a reservoir atlas was prepared to help manage reservoir fisheries resources, both now and in the future.4. To achieve self-sufficiency in fish seed production, the Master Plan for Fish Seed Production was prepared in 2019-2020. As a result, adoption of early breeding of Indian major carps was successfully introduced, Photo credit: Arun Padiyar/WorldFish and four government/OPDC hatcheries were upgraded to mega hatcheries. In addition, introducing genetically improved varieties such as jayanti rohu, catla and amur common carp improved early breeding and seed quality in 49 private hatcheries.5. Technical support was provided for lateral expansion of freshwater aquaculture through Matsya Pokhari Yojana and PMMSY, under which more than 6689 ha of new fishponds were excavated over the past 3 years. To this end, beneficiary farmers received district-and block-level training on better management practices for sustainable and profitable fish farming.6. To increase farmer profits and resilience to climate change, several measures were used to successfully promote crop diversification. A state-of-the-art GIFT hatchery was set up at the government fish seed farm in Kausalyaganga, amur carp seed production was introduced in 11 government hatcheries, and four GIFT hatcheries were established by the private sector. In addition, farmers were given demonstrations on best practices for GIFT production in over 250 acres of farms and were provided with support on how to create market links.7. Nutrition-sensitive carp-mola polyculture was widely promoted throughout Odisha in various types of water bodies, such as GP tanks, private tanks, backyard tanks and and agricultural farm ponds. The goal was to make nutritional gains, especially among vulnerable and tribal communities in the state. To accomplish this, the government brought out suitable schemes for promoting polyculture fish farming system in 10,000 agricultural farm ponds on an annual basis.8. In the freshwater and brackish water sectors, biofloc and polyliners were introduced to jumpstart intensive aquaculture. At total of 7080 biofloc tanks were installed in all 30 districts, and more than 1838 farmers, entrepreneurs and youths were trained to take up this activity.conducted in order to understand ground-level impacts achieved in the fisheries and aquaculture sector as a result of the technical collaboration between WorldFish and the FARD Department. 12. Support was provided to effectively implement a fishing ban in olive ridley turtle nesting sites in three rivermouths and the Bhitarkanika marine wildlife sanctuary along the coast of Odisha. This was done by integrating GIS-based mapping in the Fisher Friend Mobile Application of the department with the GPS navigation systems of the fishing vessels.13. A third party \"Impact assessment study of the FARD-WorldFish technical collaboration\" was impact assessment study of the Odisha-WorldFish Project wasWomen SHG members farming fish in Gram Panchayat tanks (left), Photo 4: Nutritious Small Indigenous Fish (right). Currently, WorldFish is providing technical support to the FARD Department with two externally funded projects:1. The Taking Nutrition-Sensitive Carp-SIS Polyculture Technology to Scale project is supported by the German Corporation for International Cooperation (GIZ) in Germany and will be implemented over 3 years (2021)(2022)(2023)(2024). It focuses on developing and disseminating hatchery seed production technology for small indigenous fish species, including mola.2. The One CGIAR Resilient Aquatic Food Systems for Healthy People and Planet (RAqFS) project is funded by the CGIAR Trust Fund and is also a 3-year program (2022)(2023)(2024)(2025). For this project, WorldFish is supporting the FARD Department, as well as other line departments (WCD, Mission Shakti, Water Resources-OIIPCRA project) with implementing fisheries sector development programs, as per the requirements and guidance of the government."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3365681567.json b/main/part_2/3365681567.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9777d7ac849555a72d188df37a1d4b633ae8ba5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3365681567.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ab62fa5ec413c01e6935611378135a3f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ef38a4bb-08c3-4b93-ad8b-ecc77361fd72/retrieve","id":"1367341057"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"945ea6f3-ddfe-4581-8189-425f142173eb","content":"The crop: Durum wheat • It is the 10 th most important crop in the World • 16 million hectares (70% rainfed) • 40 million tons • The program targets 8.5 M ha of cultivation • 150 varieties across 23 countries • It is a staple and a cash crop Mediterranean seasonal variation is the normSimulate it with across environment testing MET Where to find adaptation: genebank• It is a \"biblical\" crop• Emmer was domesticated over 10,000 years ago From 1% to 1.8%: a revised program "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3366561485.json b/main/part_2/3366561485.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a85588388056f100c0a0021aaa899090999f728b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3366561485.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7d89d8aed70204a9accda021b4978502","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/69e59a63-e54a-4ad0-9300-68c55145acad/retrieve","id":"-767461393"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ee502818-085b-4772-a58c-1804e105ef53","content":"A recent ex ante impact assessment indicates that orangefleshed sweetpotatoes can make a major contribution to alleviating vitamin A malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa. Replacing the white-fleshed varieties now grown by farmers with new high ß-carotene cultivars that meet local preferences would benefit an estimated 50 million children under age 6 who are currently at risk. The majority of children in Burundi, Rwanda and Uganda would benefit, as would about half of the children in Tanzania. Children in Ethiopia, Kenya and South Africa would also be affected, though to a lesser degree. The study did not take into account the benefits of the new cultivars to pregnant and lactating women, a population whose health is also likely to improve from the availability of the new plant types. Vitamin A deficiency is a major public health problem throughout the region and is responsible for tens of thousands of deaths annually among young children.During the past 20 years, nutritionists in several developing countries have assembled compelling evidence that many children (especially young ones) and adults lack adequate essential vitamins and minerals in their diets (United Nations, 1997). Deficiency in vitamin A is one of the most prevalent problems, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The functional consequences of vitamin A deficiency are dramatic: \"Severe Vitamin A deficiency has very high fatality rates (60%) but even sub-clinical deficiency is associated with a 23% increase in preschooler mortality in areas with endemic Vitamin A deficiency\" (McGuire, 1993).Consequently, a massive international effort has been underway since the early 1990s to combat vitamin A deficiency. Emphasis in many countries was initially placed on supplementation programs, in the belief that distribution of vitamin capsules could solve the problem quickly. However, experience has shown that although supplementation can be cost-effective, it must be repeated every six months. Thus, in many countries with poorly developed health and road infrastructure, supplementation can be logistically difficult to implement, and has mostly been sustained only through continued financial support from outside donors.A second approach, that of fortifying common foods with a micronutrient, has been used successfully in some instances. But in countries where markets for foods are not well developed, it has been difficult to identify appropriate foods to fortify in order to reach the consumers who are most at risk. Moreover, legal infrastructure has to be sufficiently strong to ensure that manufacturers comply with fortification laws.A third approach is to improve dietary quality and quantity through diversification. The goal is to achieve and maintain an adequate intake of micronutrient-rich foods in the context of an adequate total diet (World Health Organization, 1996). Food-based approaches require an inter-sectoral perspective, which means providing agricultural and educational inputs, with an awareness of cultural, socio-economic, market and health conditions. Some components, such as home gardens and introduction of new crops, have not always measured up to expectations, but, in general, donors and governments have invested only limited resources in food-based approaches that may prove to be the most sustainable of the various interventions (Ruel and Levin, 2000).In most countries, a mix of the three approaches is practiced. The focus of this paper is on the potential contribution in the medium term of one crop, sweetpotato, for increasing vitamin A intake in Sub-Saharan Africa as part of a food-based intervention.Few foods are rich in vitamin A. Some animal foods, such as fish oils, liver, milk, eggs and butter, contain vitamin A in its true form (also called retinol) which can be used directly and easily by the human body. But the rural and urban poor in developing countries have only limited access to these expensive vitamin A-rich animal foods. Although plant foods and vegetables do not contain vitamin A as such, they do contain precursors, or pro-vitamin A -ß-carotene and other carotenoids -that the human body can convert to vitamin A. Considerable effort has therefore been made to promote improved pro-vitamin A intake through increased consumption and improved storage and preparation of a variety of suitable plant sources of these compounds.Orange-fleshed sweetpotatoes have emerged as one of the most promising plant sources of ß-carotene (Hagenimana and Low, 2000). A 100-g serving (about half a cupful) of boiled roots can supply about 50% of the daily vitamin A requirement of a young child. Weight for weight, current varieties of orange-fleshed sweetpotatoes contain 20-30 times more ß-carotene than does Golden Rice® (Ye et al, 2000). Sweetpotato varieties common in the USA have deep-orange flesh, but those grown in Sub-Saharan Africa have white flesh, and contain no pro-vitamin A. It is the prospect of going from nothing to a very sizeable something that fuels interest in orange-fleshed sweetpotato.Traditionally, orange-flesh has been associated with low dry matter, but the strong preference in Sub-Saharan Africa is for types with higher dry matter. Sufficient progress has now been made via conventional plant breeding to break the link between flesh color and dry matter, and more orange-fleshed sweetpotato varieties with higher dry matter are becoming available (Dapeng Zhang, CIP, personal communication, 2001).A high level of pro-vitamin A in a crop does not automatically confer improved nutritional status. Absorption depends on the health status of the individual (for example, persons infected with worms absorb less than those not infested), and the presence of inhibitors (such as fiber) and enhancers (such as fat) determines the effectiveness with which ß-carotene is converted into vitamin A (de Pee, 1999). Provitamin A from dark-orange fleshy fruits and vegetables (such as ripe mango, papaya or sweetpotato, but not oranges), appears to be more bio-available (absorbed and utilized) than does pro-vitamin A from dark leafy greens (de Pee et al, 1995(de Pee et al, , 1998;;Khan et al, 1997;Jalal et al, 1998). 1 Because vitamin A is stored in the liver, measuring bio-availability is difficult. One of the few clinical trials undertaken in developing countries did use sweetpotatoes as a source of pro-vitamin A (Jalal et al, 1998). The trial (Figure 1) showed that incorporating orangefleshed sweetpotatoes into the diet given to 3-6 year olds who were 1 Until recently, the commonly used conversion factors for estimating vitamin A intake reflected the higher bio-availability of animal sources of vitamin A over plant sources: • 1 retinol equivalent (RE) = 1 µg retinol from animal sources • 1 RE = 6 µg all-trans ß-carotene In particular, the ß-carotene:retinol equivalency of purified ß-carotene in oil was about 2:1 and it was thought that 3 µg of dietary ß-carotene was equivalent to 1 µg of purified ß-carotene in oil (NRC, 1989). Recent work among school children in Indonesia and breastfeeding women in Vietnam, which compared the increase in serum retinol resulting from feeding different types of foods, calculated the following apparent conversion factors: • Retinol-rich foods (animal sources): 1 RE = 1 µg retinol • Fruits, pumpkin, orange-fleshed sweetpotatoes: 1 RE = 12 µg ß-carotene • Dark-green leafy vegetables or carrots: 1 RE = 26 µg ß-carotene In response to these new findings, in 2001 a new conversion unit -retinol activity equivalent (RAE) -was established, with a conversion rate of 1 RAE = 1 µg retinol = 12 µg ß-carotene (Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board, 2001). Not all evidence supports a lower conversion rate (Takyi, 1999). marginally deficient in vitamin A significantly increased serum retinol concentrations (ie,. improved vitamin A status), by about the same amount as a treatment comprising a drug for worms and added fat in the diet. But a combination of improved ß-carotene intake, added fat and improved health had a greater effect than either of these treatments alone.In addition, an 18-month village-level pilot study undertaken in western Kenya confirmed that potential exists to successfully substitute ß-carotene-rich sweetpotatoes for the white-fleshed sweetpotatoes in the diets of young children in that region (Low, et al, 1997;Hagenimana et al, 1999).Introducing a marginal change in the diet (such as switching varieties) is likely to be easier than introducing a completely new food. Therefore, the potential medium-term impact of orange-fleshed sweetpotato in Sub-Saharan Africa is a function of the area currently under sweetpotato production 2 . This paper examines the potential to meet the intake needs of young children at risk of vitamin A deficiency in Sub-Saharan Africa, based on a spatial evaluation of where sweetpotatoes are being produced. In particular, we address the question: Is sweetpotato availability per person sufficiently large to warrant optimism that substituting orange-fleshed for white-fleshed varieties will result in significant improvements in pro-vitamin A intake? Because sweetpotato is widely perceived to be a secondary food crop that is produced seasonally in only parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, responses to this question are not trivial. The calculation on the potential impact of orange-fleshed sweetpotato varieties on pro-vitamin A status is driven by supply and demand assumptions. The framework for analysis is a geographic information system (GIS) that permits a disaggregated spatial evaluation of per capita production of sweetpotato. The unit of observation is a grid cell of 2.5 x 2.5 arc-minutes (about 5 x 5 km).The supply and demand assumptions are listed in Table 1. Population data were taken from the 2.5-minute Global gridded population database for the year 1995 (CIESIN, 2000). We used a global geo-referenced database of sweetpotato area for 1997-99 (Huaccho and Hijmans, 2000;Hijmans et al, 2001). For a uniform treatment across countries, this database (with a few exceptions). combines national total area estimates from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) with more disaggregate information on the distribution of the relative sweetpotato growing area across administrative units or production zones 3 . The polygons from the sweetpotato database were transferred to the 2.5-minute grid. As these grid cells are rather small in relation to the precision of the sweetpotato database, the data were smoothed across the grid cells, to allow for the consumption of produce outside, but near to, production zones. For many households, particularly those located in towns and cities, purchasing sweetpotato in the market will be the principal means to tap the potential of the orange-fleshed varieties. By dividing the sweetpotato area and the population grids we obtained a new grid with the sweetpotato area per capita for each grid cell. From this new grid, the distribution of sweetpotato area per capita over the population was determined for each country.National yield estimates are also taken from the FAO production database. Because sweetpotato does not store well once harvested, and throughout Sub-Saharan Africa is usually eaten in boiled form after peeling, post-harvest and peeling losses have to be factored into the calculation. For example, for the case of Kenya with an estimated national yield of 10 t/ha, the net yield available for the supply of provitamin A is assumed to be 6.5 t/ha (Table 1).The assumptions made in Table 1 about the pro-vitamin A content of orange-fleshed sweetpotato and about demand are based largely on the aforementioned pilot project focusing on the introduction of orange-fleshed varieties to women's groups in rural South Nyanza, western Kenya (Low et al, 1997). We assume that the orangefleshed varieties supply 350 RAE (retinol activity equivalents) per 100 g fresh matter. This is equivalent to about 4200 µg of ß-carotene per 100 g fresh matter, which is about 50% of the ß-carotene content of cooked sweetpotato in the USA (Holden et al, 1999). Cooking losses further reduce the pro-vitamin A content of the orange-fleshed varieties. Therefore, we assume that the net supply of pro-vitamin A available from orange-fleshed varieties is 228 RAE per 100 g of edible matter (Table 1).The other supply-related element in Table 1 is seasonal availability. Sweetpotato is a perishable secondary crop of seasonal importance 3 Data collection on sweetpotato by national systems is weak and production is typically under-reported in countries where it is a secondary food crop (most of southern Africa, for example), especially when it is intercropped. For instance, most of what figures as potato in Malawi is really sweetpotato. In 2000 or 2001, FAO revised upward the estimated sweetpotato-growing area in Nigeria in the late 1990s, from 5000 to 378,000 ha! In Mozambique, the first census of agriculture shows that about 45% of rural farm households cultivate some sweetpotato; the existing national data show an area of only 8000 ha. Typically, data are most reliable in countries where sweetpotato is a major staple. Therefore, results outside East Africa should be interpreted with caution. in many regions of Sub-Saharan Africa. Piecemeal harvesting is a common practice that increases the length of the availability of the crop to the farm household. Piecemeal harvesting of the improved varieties begins two-three months after planting and often continues for five-seven months. In bimodal rainfall areas two cropping seasons are common, and in parts of the East African highlands where rainfall is less seasonally distributed sweetpotato can be cultivated throughout the year. Even in relatively isolated rural markets seasonal availability may be more than five months. Like several of the supply-related assumptions in Table 1, this one is judged to be conservative.Because of the lack of information on the geographic incidence of vitamin A deficiency, we address the issue of adequacy more generally, from the perspective of percentage of recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for the most vulnerable group: children aged between six months and six years. We assume that young children make up 20% of the population in each grid cell. Using the Helen Keller method as an approximation, Low et al (1997) found that about 20% of young children were judged to have an 'adequate' intake of vitamin A; the vulnerable group is therefore 80% of young children, or 16% of the total population. Finally, we assume that vitamin-A-malnourished young children consume half as much sweetpotato per day than do other age groups. 4 Collectively, the assumptions in Table 1 result in the summary relationship between per capita production of sweetpotato and provitamin A intake (relative to RDA) that is described in Figure 2. With the full replacement of white-fleshed varieties with orange-fleshed ones, the increasing per capita production of sweetpotato linearly contributes to vitamin A adequacy until production reaches about 30 kg/person. This 'full-impact' level satisfies about 40% of the annual RDA. Beyond 30 kg/person the attainment of adequacy bumps up against the seasonal constraint of five-month availability. 5 4 We are not aware of dietary surveys on individuals in Sub-Saharan Africa that show age by gender consumption of sweetpotato. Our assumption is based on Ryan et al (1984) who conducted dietary surveys on a sample of 240 households in six villages on the Deccan Plateau of India. Across about 15 commodity groups, the per capita intake per day of young children aged 1-6 was about 50% of that of older children, adolescents, and adults. 5 Only a full substitution scenario is specified to assess potential. It is unrealistic to think that orange-fleshed varieties will replace all white-fleshed varieties now grown by farmers. However, farm surveys have shown that varietal change is very dynamic as even subsistence producers are rapidly turning over native varieties. One variety, called Tanzania, has spread throughout East Africa and is also penetrating into southern Africa. Partial adoption scenarios could be specified but with the existing information they would not be that informative and merely fractions of the full adoption scenario. More definitive analysis of expected benefits must await the completion of more pilot-site or larger intervention projects.The above calculation was carried out for the five countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda) invited to participate initially in the Vitamin A for Africa (VITAA) Partnership that focuses on orange-fleshed sweetpotato in a food-based approach (CIP, 2001). Rwanda and Burundi were also included because they have the highest per capita production of sweetpotato in Sub-Saharan Africa. Per capita production is also high in Uganda. In Kenya, Tanzania and Ethiopia, sweetpotato is regionally important, but in Ethiopia, according to FAO, production levels are very low -considerably less than government data suggest. South Africa has the lowest per capita production.As expected, per capita production in Burundi, Rwanda and Uganda is sufficiently high to make a large dent in the problem of vitamin A deficiency. The pro-vitamin A intake approaches a full-impact 40% of RDA in each of the three countries (Table 2). 6 In Tanzania, about half of the population at risk attains the full-impact outcome. In Kenya, the bulk of the population at risk still benefits somewhat from the replacement of the white-fleshed with the orange-fleshed varieties. In Ethiopia and South Africa, the mean intake increases by only a modest 2% of RDA; however, about one-third of the population at risk in each country experiences a rise in intake. Across the seven countries, about one-third of the population at risk receives the 6 As a point of reference, the average estimates of simulated impact for the countries in Table 2 can be compared with somewhat similar estimates for the replacement of existing rice varieties with Golden Rice cultivars (Robertson et al, 2001). This application centers on the island of Cebu in the Philippines and is based on a longitudinal health and nutrition survey. Both rice and white flint maize are important staples in Cebu. Full replacement of ordinary rice with Golden Rice (with a future potential level of 200 µg ß-carotene per 100 g rice) results in an improved pro-vitamin A intake of about 6% of RDA for the bottom asset quintile of children aged 10-12 that were followed in the longitudinal survey. Because richer households eat proportionally more rice than do poorer households, the increase in %RDA (of about 13%) was highest for the top quintile. The impact of switching from white to yellow maize was an increase of 4% of RDA for the low quintile and of less than 2% for the top quintile. increase to 40% of RDA, one-third receives a partial benefit, and one-third does not benefit from the switch to orange-fleshed varieties.Unless covered by supplementation or fortification programs, much of this increase in intake will accrue to children who have only very low levels of pro-vitamin A intake. Results from dietary surveys, such as Ryan et al (1984), indicated that it is rare for an individual in semiarid tropics in India to have an intake exceeding 50% RDA.Applying the same 'back-of-the-envelope' calculation to all of Sub-Saharan Africa shows that the potential of orange-fleshed varieties to contribute to solving the problem of vitamin A deficiency is greatest in the Lake Victoria region of the East African highlands (Map 1). We would also expect positive results in Madagascar and parts of southern Africa, and even in some areas of West Africa. About 10 million children (about 10% of the population at risk in Sub-Saharan Africa) would receive the full benefit of an increase in pro-vitamin A How sensitive are these results to the assumptions made in Table 1? We have not explored this issue thoroughly, but we carried out a sensitivity analysis for two of the important variables: the assumptions that seasonal availability is five months, and that the pro-vitamin A content of orange-fleshed varieties is 350 RAE/100 g.The seasonal availability assumption could be unduly restrictive so we relaxed this assumption by considering longer periods including all 12 months of the year. If sweetpotato is available (or can be made available) for a longer period in the high per capita production countries of Rwanda, Burundi and Uganda, then the potential role played by orange-fleshed varieties is substantially greater than our calculations indicate (Figure 3). Seasonally smoothing the existing level of production in these sweetpotato-dense countries (and to a lesser extent in Tanzania) will substantially improve vitamin A nutrition. In the other three countries, production per capita is not sufficiently high to derive gains from extending seasonal availability without increasing production.In contrast, the goal of increasing the pro-vitamin A content of the orange-fleshed varieties will generate more benefits to groups at risk in regions with moderate production levels than to similar groups in geographic areas with high per capita production (Figure 4). But even for the 'intermediate' countries of Tanzania and Kenya, returns to investing in breeding to improve pro-vitamin A content of orangefleshed materials are diminishing. The data in Figure 4 suggest that 150-200 RAE/100 g fresh matter is a critical threshold level that cultivars require if they are to have much impact, particularly in high per capita production regions. Figure 4 is good news to plant breeders because it shows that levels of pro-vitamin A in orangefleshed materials do not have to be that high to have potential for impact.These preliminary calculations demonstrate the promise for orangefleshed sweetpotatoes to contribute to a food-based approach to tackling the problem of vitamin A deficiency in Sub-Saharan Africa. In many parts of Sub-Saharan Africa there is sufficient per capita production of sweetpotato to be optimistic about the potential of These estimates also suggest that increasing the availability of sweetpotato across seasons of the year will be more effective in improving nutritional status than will augmenting the pro-vitamin A content of orange-fleshed sweetpotato. Indeed, it seems that orangefleshed materials do not have to be that 'orange' to make practical impact.These calculations can be refined in several ways. Other vulnerable groups, such as pregnant and lactating women, can be considered in the population at risk. Agronomic knowledge can be brought to bear in a GIS-format to sharpen responses to issues regarding the seasonality of production. The nexus between production and market availability could be modeled. However, the pay-off to refinement is largely conditioned by the reliability of area estimates from state statistical reporting agencies.Finally, our estimates indicate only potential. One or more highly focused bio-availability studies are needed to confirm that potential. Investments in breeding, in adaptation and in education programs about orange-flesh sweetpotatoes also need to be viewed in the larger context of more costly direct interventions, such as supplementation and fortification. Ultimately, tapping the potential of orange-fleshed sweetpotatoes hinges on a sustained effort in multilocational varietal testing featuring participatory varietal selection."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3386637096.json b/main/part_2/3386637096.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8dd934e1c78e87484e93b0f527faf929a22f38cc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3386637096.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2ce8a9bbe4cc8bf9e47aa0ab9dd6db5c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/96300038-184f-435f-99f7-fac6bdba7a84/content","id":"687323483"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6553d198-445c-4984-82a3-c66a1efbcac9","content":"A terminal dry spell is one of the main limiting factors for rice productions. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the effect of supplemental irrigation for managing the impact of terminal dry spells on the productivity of different rice varieties grown under rainfed conditions in the Fogera Plain. The experiment was designed in a split-plot design with water regimes as main plot factors and rice varieties as a subplot factor with three replications. The water regimes were: dry planted rainfed rice (farmers practice) (FP), transplanted but not irrigated (IWOI), transplanted and irrigated to saturation (SAT), transplanted and ponding to 1 cm water (PD1), and transplanted and ponding to 3 cm water (PD2). The rice varieties were: X-Jigna (V1), Edget (V2), Hiber (V3), Fogera-1 (V4), and Nerica-4 (V5). The combined effect of PD2 with V1 had the highest grain yield (t/ha) (4.35 t/ ha) while FP with V3 had the lowest grain yield (2.12 t/ha). The highest (205%) relative grain yield was obtained when V1 was grown under PD2 followed by V4 under PD2 (199%) and V5 under PD2 (192%) compared to FP with V3. Irrigation water productivity (WP IR ) varied between water regimes x varieties from as low as 1.84kg grain mm À1 ha À1 for V3 in FP to as high as the yield of 3.07kg grain mm À1 ha À1 for V1 in PD2. The highest and lowest net benefits were recorded for V1 grown under PD2 (65, 550 ETB) and for V3 grown under TWOI (33, 500 ETB ha À1 ), respectively. Hence, the combined application of 3 cm ponding depth (PD2) with X-Jigna (V1) and 1cm ponding depth with Fogera-1 (V4) rice varieties could be suggested as effective terminal stress management to increase the yield and profitability of rainfed rice in the Fogera Plain and similar agro-ecologies.Worldwide, there is about 151.1 million ha of rainfed lowlands, which contribute 20% of the world's total rice production, and 14 million ha of rainfed uplands, which contribute 4% of the world's total rice production (FAOSTAT, 2019). However, water shortage is a major problem for crop production worldwide, limiting the growth and productivity of many crops, especially in rain-fed agriculture (Passioura, 2007). The dependency on the irregular input of precipitation can cause a shortage of water, commonly known as dry spells (Enfors and Gordon, 2007). The key challenge for lowland rice production is to reduce water-related risks posed by high rainfall variability rather than coping with an absolute lack of water (Rockstr€ om et al., 2007). Rice is introduced to Ethiopia in the early 1980s (Gebey et al., 2012). The average rice productivity in Ethiopia is estimated at 2.81 t ha À1 , which is much lower than the World's average of 4.7 t ha À1 (FAOSTAT, 2019). This is due to multi-fold factors. As reported by Gebey et al. (2012) lowland rice production in Ethiopia is constrained by occasional terminal drought, poor soil fertility, weeds, insect pests and it is also dry spell stress at the late season or due to early cessation of rainfall (Tadesse et al., 2013).Crop yields are often reduced significantly due to the late start and early cessation of rain with long dry spells during the vegetative and reproductive growth stages (Tadross et al., 2009). A dry spell of any length could occur at any stage of crop growth; however, it is potentially detrimental if it coincides with the most sensitive stages such as flowering and grain filling (Stern and Coe, 1984). Rice has been identified as a water deficit susceptible to rainfed and drought-prone areas, showing negative effects, particularly in the booting, flowering, and grain filling stages leading to low crop productivity (Tsuda et al., 2010). Rice plants are the most sensitive to deficit moisture stress during the period about 10 days before flowering to the end of flowering (Yoshida, 1981).The rice-based production system is intimately associated with sustainable water management practices mainly on developing and adopting strategies and practices through efficient use of resources. Such strategies and practices would produce more rice with low input of water (Renault and Facon, 2004). Kima et al. (2014) suggested that the application of 3 cm water depth above soil surface can be recommended to farmers as an alternative to save irrigation water and increase productivity. Similarly, as reported by Khairi et al. (2015) application of irrigation water at saturated to 1 cm ponding in a farmers' field for rice cultivation could be maintained optimal production. Bouman et al. (2005) and Atlin et al. (2006) suggested that the aerobic (saturated moisture level) rice system could be an option for farmers in rainfed lowland rice with a limited or an unreliable distribution of rainfall. More rice with less water can only be achieved through an integration of crop varieties and resource management practices at the field level (Tuong et al., 2005). Supplemental irrigation, the combination of rainfed farming and limited irrigation, are ideal choice for improving crop yield in the moisture-stressed situation (Deng et al., 2006).Supplemental irrigation may be the tool for small-holder farmers to stabilize rainfed farming crop water supply and increase water productivity thereby increasing yields (Fox and Rockstr€ om, 2003). Supplemental irrigation is a key strategy, still underused, for solving rainfed yield potential, and water productivity (Rockstr€ om et al., 2010). Increased water use efficiency (WUE) of field crops was possible through proper irrigation scheduling by providing only the water that matches the crop evapotranspiration and providing irrigation at critical growth stages (Wang et al., 2001). Using a limited amount of water if applied during critical crop growth stages, result in a substantial increase in yield, water productivity, and improving livelihoods in the dry rainfed areas (Oweis and Hachum, 2006).The rainfed-based rice farming in Fogera Plain is concerned with guaranteeing water accessibility at the terminal stage of the crop and subsequently stabilize rainfed rice yield. A major effort for rainfed rice farmers in the study area is to supply water to the rice farm and escape periods of water stress from heading to grain filling stages. Moreover, water access problems especially unable to use ground and river water properly and the lack of promising varieties, are closely linked to water management practices, in influencing the potential for grain yield production. With this intention, rainfed-based rice farmers in the study area need to integrate water management technologies, rice varieties, and rainfall dry spell patterns to overcome water deficit at the most sensitive growth stages of rice and thereby improving productivity. However, the study area lacks previously conducted supplemental irrigation for managing the effect of terminal dry spells studies which are supported by dry spell analysis results and data of the necessary popular rice varieties. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of supplemental irrigation for managing the influence of terminal dry spells on the productivity of different rice varieties grown under rainfed conditions in the Fogera Plain, North-western Ethiopia.The experiment was conducted for two years (main rainy season) of 2017 and 2018 in Fogera District, North-Western Ethiopia. The study area is one of the rice production districts in the Fogera Plain located around the eastern part of Lake Tana Sub-Basin. The experimental site is located between Latitude 11 0 49 0 55 North and Longitude 37 0 37 0 40 East (Figure 1). The altitude of the experimental site is 1815 m above sea level. Monthly rainfall and temperature data from the Woreta metrological station are summarized and presented in Figure 2. The study stations have a mean annual minimum and the maximum temperature of 12.75 C and 27.37 C, respectively with a mean temperature of 20.06 C. The mean annual rainfall of the study district was received at 1320.20mm. The station receives high rainfall in July and August. As the data over the last 32 years show (Figure 2), the rainfall amount is relatively low in June (planting period) and September (flowering to grain filling period of rice). Table 2 presents the main physicochemical soil characteristics and climatic conditions of the experimental site.The experiment was laid out as a split-plot design with two factors, water regimes as the main plot and rice varieties as a subplot with three replications. The water regimes were: dry planted rainfed rice (farmers practice) (FP); transplanted but not irrigated (IWOI), transplanted and irrigated to saturation (SAT), transplanted and ponding to 1 cm water (PD1), and transplanted and ponding to 3 cm water (PD2). The rice varieties were: X-Jigna (V1), Edget (V2), Hiber (V3), Fogera-1 (V4), and Nerica-4 (V5). The size of each gross plot was 4 m  5 m (20 m 2 ) and 20 rows spaced at 22cm and with a gross experimental area of 60 m 2 . The distances between the plots and blocks were 0.5m and 1m, respectively. The outermost rows at both sides of the plots and 0.5m row length at each end of the rows were used as borders. The third, fourth, and fifth rows at one side of the plots were designated for soil moisture measurement while the sixth, seventh, and eighth rows were used to guard the ninth to eighteenth rows which were used as a net plot for final biomass, grain yield, and measurements of yield components.The land was plowed four times and leveled using a shovel, a rake, and a leveling board. The experimental plot bund had 50 cm width and 30 cm height. The outer edge of each ridge was constructed by heavy clay and highly weathered (kaolinite types of clay) soil was compacted using a compaction rod to prevent water flow in and out of the ridges. Kaolinite clay was also mined from the local mine of clay pot makers. After the first leveling, soaking, and puddling, the soil was re-leveled and bund sealing was done. Similarly, ponding ridge construction was done next to the target plot ridge to maintain the water balance and control subsurface water flow out of the target plot during the application of supplementary irrigation. The direct application of irrigation water from the source to the command plot was maintained with 100% conveyance efficiency using plastic hoses. The puddling, bud sealing, and ponding to the minimum level reduced seepage and percolation losses with increased application efficiency. Puddling practice help to decrease seepage and percolation losses (Tomar et al., 2006). The soil is kept close to saturation and ponding to a 1 cm water level, thereby reducing seepage and percolation losses (Bouman et al., 2007). Combined seepage and percolation losses range from 1-5 mm d À1 in heavy clay soils to a massive 25-30 mm d À1 in sandy and sandy-loam soils (Bouman et al., 2005). Supplementary irrigation date was determined based on 32 years of rainfall dry spell length analysis, local farmers' experiences, and daily regular visits of rainfall amount from the nearby weather station during the experimental periods. When the rain stopped and/or greater dry spell at the terminal stage occurred, supplemental irrigation water was pumped from a previously constructed reservoir to the experimental plot through a delivery plastic hose. A valve and volumetric discharge measurement device were installed at the location where the plastic hose enters each plot and were used to control and measure the amount of water needed for each plot. Ponded water depths were measured in each main plot using perforated tubes of 10 cm diameter PVC and were installed in each main plot to 30 cm below the soil surface. The bottom 27 cm of the tubes was perforated with 3 mm-diameter holes at 2 cm intervals to record both above and below the grounds water level above grounds and below the groundwater level.The planting material consisted of five rice varieties out of which four were improved varieties that have nearly similar days of maturity ranging from 110 to 130 days, and the other one was a local variety that has been cultivated by farmers in the study area for a long time. Seeds of the improved rice varieties (Edget, Hiber, Fogera-1, and Nerica-4) were obtained from Fogera National Rice Research Centre whereas seed of the local variety was obtained from farmers in the study area (Table 1). X-Jigna (local variety) is a tall variety 00 , Fogera-1 00 and 00 Nerica-4 00 are medium in stature whereas 00 Edget 00 and 00 Hiber 00 are short varieties. A pregerminated seed was prepared by soaking the seed over 24 h in clean water and then was incubated in a warm moist condition for 48 h by placing it in a sack filled to half its capacity. Sowing pre-germinated seeds was done in the nursery bed. The seedling that reaches 3-4 leaves stage or 20 days age was transplanted after the puddling experimental plot. Dry planting (farmers' practice) and transplanting were done in mid-June and at the end of the first week of July, respectively. Each plot received uniform doses of 69 kg ha À1 of nitrogen using urea (150 kg/ha of 46% nitrogen) and 23 kg ha À1 of phosphorus using diammonium phosphate (100 kg/ha of 18% nitrogen and 23% phosphorus) fertilizer sources. N was applied in two splits, one-third at planting, and two-third at the panicle initiation stage; whereas the full dose of phosphorus was applied at planting. The recommended agronomic practices were implemented based on the fertilizer recommendation of the Fogera national rice research center.The soil water content of the rice field was taken from the depth of 60 cm from the central rows of each plot in two replications. The samples were taken per pit from the four directions of the pit at two depths with a 30 cm interval (0-30 and 30-60 cm) before and after irrigation. Soil water content was determined by gravimetrical method. Gravimetric soil water content was converted into a volumetric basis using a bulk density of soil cores taken from each depth. Based on the soil water data, before irrigation (actual moisture content) and after irrigation (soil in the saturated state) available water in the root zone was also determined (Lopez et al., 1996). Particle density was also determined by the graduated cylinder method (Bashour and Sayegh, 2007). Bulk density (BD) was again determined from the weight of undisturbed (core) soil samples, which were first weighed at field moisture content and then dried in an oven at 105 C to constant weight (Baruah and Barthakur, 1997). The moisture content at ST (soil in the saturated state) was measured at 0 bars soil water potential using the pressure plate apparatus (Klute, 1986). The results were converted into volume percent (Vol%) by multiplying the gravimetric water content by bulk density. Irrigation scheduling was done using the information on crop coefficient (Kc), reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for proper irrigation scheduling. Allen et al. (1998) have presented updated values for crop coefficient and depletion level. Depletion level may vary due to climatic variation hence, numerically adjusted P for ETc rate is P 0 ¼ P presented þ0.04 (5-ETc) where the adjusted P 0 is limited to 0.1 P 0 0.8, ETc is in mm/day. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo), which is an index for the evaporation demand of the atmosphere is estimated from the climatic data using the FAO-Penman Monteith equation (Allen et al., 1998). According to Brower and Heibloem (1986), irrigation water requirement of rice was determined using the following approach:where, _ IRWðmmÞ represents irrigation water requirement (mm); _ DPðmmÞ, depth of ponding (mm); SATðmmÞ; depth of water required to saturate the soil (mm); ET c ðmmÞ, evapotranspiration of the crop (mm), _ SPðmmÞ seepage and percolation losses (mm) (it was safely assumed 1-5 mm d À1 losses (Bouman et al., 2005)); P e ðmmÞ effective rainfall during the period (mm).Initially, before planting, two composite soil samples (0-30 and 30-60 cm) were taken from six random spots across the experimental field with the auger. The soil samples were collected, air-dried, ground, sieved to pass a 2-mm mesh, and composited into one. Soil analysis was carried out from the composite sample in duplicates where soil samples were analyzed for soil texture using Bouyoucos hydrometer method (Bouyoucos, 1962). Total N content in the soil samples was determined titrimetrically following the Kjeldahl method as described by Jackson (1958). The pH of the soil was measured potentiometrically in the supernatant suspension of a 1:2.5 soil to water ratio using a pH meter as described by Chopra and Kanwar (1976). Organic carbon was determined using the wet digestion method (Walkley and Black, 1934) and Extractable P (available P) using the Bray II method (Bray and Kurtz, 1945). Extractable K, Ca, Na, and Mg were determined on the extracts solution with a flame photometer as described by Rowell (1994). The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil was determined using the ammonium acetate method (Hesse, 1972). The electrical conductivity of the soil was measured by conductivity meter from saturation soil paste extracts as described by Rhoades (1996).Daily precipitation, relative humidity, wind speed, sunshine hour, and maximum and minimum air temperature for the site were collected from National Meteorological Agency (NMSA). Daily rainfall data monitoring was also collected during the experiment period from a nearby weather station (Woreta) almost one kilometer away from the experimental site.Grain yield (GY t/ha) and above-ground biomass yield (AGB t/ha) were determined on harvesting the crop of the entire net plot area. Grain yield was represented based on moisture content set at 14%. For the adjusted grain yield ¼ Moisture correction factors x non-adjusted grain yield obtained from each plot is recommended according to Birru (1979) and Mulvaney and Devkota (2020). Moisture correction factor (MCF) was obtained by the following formula:where, _ y is the actual moisture content in% measured by using IRRI rice hand moisture tester instrument, _x is the standard moisture content in % for rice crop. Dry matter accumulation of aboveground biomass was determined on two random spots of 10 hills from the net plot area. Samples plant tissues were dried at 70 C in an electric oven to a constant weight using a forced-draft oven for drying. Harvest index was calculated by using the following formula: HI ¼ (Grain yield)/ (Grain þ aboveground biomass yield) (Rahman, 1984;Fageria et al., 2011).Irrigation water productivity (WP IP ) was calculated as: WP IP ¼ GY SIþRF ; where, WP IP represents irrigation water productivity (mm); _ GY, grain yield kg/ha; _ SI, supplemental irrigation water (mm); _ RF, rainfall (mm). Whereas incremental irrigation water productivity (IWP IP ) was assessed using the following formula: IWP IP ¼ YIÀYN IR ; where, _ YI, irrigated rice yield (kg/ha); _ YN, (non irrigated) rainfed rice yield (kg/ha); _ IR, irrigation depth of water (mm) (Cabangon et al., 2003).Daily rainfall data was employed for dry spell analysis using the firstorder Markov Chain Model (The Instant Statistical Program (Version 3.37) (Stern et al., 2006).Data collected for economic analyses include the two experimental years' average labor cost of nursery management, transplanting and puddling labor cost, the labor cost of pumping water, water pump rent cost, and seed cost. Thus the average price for different rice seeds was 23 Birr kg À1 . Labor cost for nursery management, transplanting, and puddling labor cost, the labor cost of pumping water was 100 birr per man, per day. The cost of water pump rent was 250 birr a day. The average grain was adjusted by 10%. A partial budget analysis was conducted to evaluate the economic feasibility of the different water regimes þ rice varieties under farmers' field conditions. Therefore, partial budget analyses were performed using CIMMYT agronomic manual (CIMMYT, 1988). The partial budget analysis was done by assigning the monetary values between each practice of input and each output resulted from the average of the applied treatments of the price data of over three years.For all measured variables, normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality. Data from each year were analyzed separately, and homogeneity of variances was checked (Gomez and Gomez, 1984). A combined analysis of variance was done since the error of variances for the two years is homogenous. Whenever the treatment effects were found significant, treatment means were separated using the least significant difference (LSD) test at 5% (Gomez and Gomez, 1984) and using SAS (SAS Institute Inc, 2009).The estimated probability of dry spell lengths based on the first-order Markov Chain Model is presented in Figure 3. The analysis result revealed that dry spell lengths of 5 days (sp5), 7 days (sp7), 10 days (sp10), and 15 days (sp15) varied over the growing period from June to October. The probability of short dry spells (5-7 days) remains very low between DOY 160 to 240 at Woreta, whereas, the risk of short dry spells increases fast after DOY 240. The risk of long dry spells (10-15 days) is relatively low between DOY 150 to 260 in the study station but a fast increase of long dry spells was observed after DOY 260 (Figure 3). The longer dry spells pose greater adverse effects for rice crops at flowering and grain filling stages. It is therefore concluded that dry spell analysis and farmers' experience will support appropriate decisions when applying supplemental irrigation and appropriate planting date to minimize dry spell risk during the most sensitive stage of rice crop. A major constraint in realizing the potential yield of rice in the rainfed area is early out of rainfall due and causes a dry spell at the critical stage of rice.As a result of substantial yield loss, long dry spells coincide with drought-sensitive growth stages such as flowering and grain filling stages (Stern and Coe, 1984). Long dry spells because of significant yield loss if they coincide with drought-sensitive growth stages such as flowering and grain filling stages (Stern and Coe, 1984). Generally, for the study periods, the probability of longer dry spells increased rapidly in Woreta starting from mid of September and it takes risks of longer dry spells. Thus, unless farmers get access to supplemental irrigation that minimizes the loss of moisture from the rice farmland, the condition could be severe to the extent of leading to substantial yield losses. The distribution of the dry spells presented in Figure 3, therefore, provides important information to plan site-specific rice planting and supplemental irrigation management in the Fogera Plain.The amount of daily rainfall and dry-spells of varying degrees occurred during September and the first week of October in Fogera Plain, Ethiopia, and the farmers perceived that the rice crop was stressed during the terminal growth stage.This experience was confirmed in 32 years of daily rainfall dry spell analysis (Figure 3), and daily rainfall depth monitoring in the weather station during the experimental years (Figure 4a, b). The main season has four months (June, July, August, and September), including the first week of October which is the rice-growing period. From which only starting from mid of September to the first week of October was occurred was the time for the most frequently dry spell event (Figures 3 and 4a, b). Currently, it occurred at the heading to grain filling stages (from September 12 to October 5) of the rice crop development period whereby seven irrigations days with three days interval were applied at 12, 15, 18, Figure 3. Unconditional dry spells length for Woreta station over the period 1986-2017. 21, 24, 27, and 30 th of September (Figure 4a, b). The volume of water was applied based on irrigation water depth (Table 3). It is therefore concluded that dry spell analysis, daily regular visit rainfall depth and farmers' experience will support appropriate decision when to apply supplemental irrigation to minimize dry spell risk.The pre-plant soil (0-30 cm) and (30-60cm) depth analysis results showed that the top part of the experimental surface soil had 17% sand, 18% silt, and 65% clay, and the lower part of soil surface had 9% sand, 21% silt, and 70% clay. This implies that the textural class of the soil across depth belongs to clay texture. The analysis result indicated that the soil had medium bulk and particle density. Low bulk density and particle density values were recorded in topsoil (0-30 cm) as compared to lower depth soils (30-60cm). Bulk density was increased with increasing soil depth and the compactness of the soil due to the formation of the hardpan (Table 2). The total nitrogen (N) (0.21%) and available phosphorus (P) (9.85 mg/kg) of the soil were in the medium ratings. The level of available P and total N in the top surface soil was higher when compared to the lower depth (30-60cm depth) (Table 2). Similarly, organic carbon content (2.20%) follows the same pattern as total N and available P. Experimental site soil had a slightly acidic pH reaction which ranges between 5.38 and 5.87 across the upper and lower surface soil depth respectively. The surface soil had high cation exchange capacity (57meq/ 100gm of soil) and high base saturation due to the availability of medium level of exchangeable cations Caþþ, Kþ, Naþ, and Mgþþ (cmolc kg À1 ) respectively. The higher cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil in this experimental site was due to high clay content and relatively better organic carbon percentage. Whereas, the amount of soil exchangeable cations decreased across the lower depth (30-60cm) of the surface soil due to decrease in CEC and increase soil compaction (Table 2).The water balance component of the ETc (evapotranspiration of the crop) and SP (seepage and percolation) losses, effective rainfall, and volumes of water used for supplemental irrigation are presented in Table 3. Evapotranspiration losses accounted for the largest volume water losses (40.4-47.33%) as compared to seepage losses (8-15%). The experiment was conducted under well-managed rice plots such as bund construction and compaction, leveling, puddling, bud sealing, and a low level of ponding reduced seepage and percolation losses. The seepage losses variation across the water regimes in Table 3 was due to variation of the level of ponding from 1 to 3cm depth. Efficient field-level water management performed satisfactorily show that the volume of seepage losses could have been greatly reduced thereby increasing application efficiency in Table 3. Seasonal water use in (mm) variation across the water regimes was due to variation of year wise seasonal rainfall (mm) and irrigation water required in (mm) (Table 4).Table 5 illustrates the interaction effects of different water regimes with rice varieties on the yield of rice grains. The combination effect of PD2 with V1 had the highest grain yield (4.35 t/ha) while FP with V3 had the lowest grain yield (2.12 t/ha). The water regimes (PD1 and PD2) with rice varieties were higher grain yield than the farmer practices (FP) with V3 by a factor of 2 (Table 5). Compared to the (FP) with V3, the highest relative grain yield (205%) was obtained when V1 was grown under PD2 followed by V4 under PD2 (199%), and V5 under PD2 (192%) (Table 5). This might be attributed to the function of optimal supplemental irrigation during the dry spell at the terminal stage of rice. Similar results reported by (Cattivelli et al., 2008;Moonmoon and Islam, 2017), the water stress at critical growth stages reduce grain yield of rice. Improving the status of water at the reproductive stage helps to sustain reproductive success and the partition of assimilates for improving yields in water-limited conditions (Blum, 2009).The effect of the different water regimes with rice varieties on above-ground biomass t/ha is summarized and presented in Table 5. The interaction effect of water regime (PD2) with rice varieties had significant AGB yield compared with water stress environment (FP and TWOI) with rice varieties. The combination effect of PD2 with V1 had the highest AGB yield (6.79 t/ha) while FP with V2 had the lowest AGB yields (4.27 t/ha) as shown in Table 5. This implies that the supplemental irrigation at flowering to grain-filling period could be favored above ground biomass yield. Generally, FP and TWOI stress environment in different varieties also found that the production of AGB yield was lower than under the SAT, PD1, and PD2 water regimes (Table 5). Rice is sensitive to drought stress and even mild drought stress can result in a significant yield reduction (Guan et al., 2010). Blum (2009) reported that the production of biomass and grain yield is closely linked to the capture of soil moisture for transpiration under conditions of drought stress.Table 5 shows the effect of different water regimes with rice varieties on the harvest index. The combination of the PD2 water regime with the V5 variety had the highest HI (0.413) while FP with the variety V1 had the lowest HI (0.302). This result showed that the water stress treatment (FP and TWOI) with rice varieties had a significantly lower harvest index compared with non-stress water regimes (PD1 and PD2) with rice varieties. Non-stress water regimes (SAT, PD1, and PD2) treatments with different rice varieties had shown non-significant difference HI in SAT, transplanted and irrigating to saturation; PD1, transplanted and ponding to 1 cm water; PD2, transplanted and ponding to 3 cm water; TVW, the total volume of water in m 3 ; SATD, saturation depth in m 3 ; ETc, evapotranspiration losses; SP, seepage and percolation losses m 3 ; PD, ponding depth in m 3 , ERF, effective rainfall in m 3 ; NI, net irrigation volume in m 3 .Table 5. Generally, a higher harvest index was found under the combined effect of water regimes with varieties compared with water stress regimes (FP and TWOI) with rice varieties. Effective use of water in water-limited conditions during the period of reproductive structure may also be attributed to a higher HI and yield of the crop (Blum, 2009).Similarly, Bueno and Lafarge (2009) and Ju et al. (2009) reported that efficient water management that could enhance the remobilization of assimilates from vegetative tissues to grains during the grain-filling period usually leads to a higher HI of the crop. Water stress at booting and flowering stages cause lower HI, which could be the damaging effect of the translocation of assimilates to the grains filling process (Rahman et al., 2002).The combined effect of water regimes with rice varieties on irrigation water productivity is summarized and presented in Table 6. Irrigation water productivity (rainfall þ supplemental irrigation) varied between water regimes x varieties from as low as 1.84kg grain mm À1 ha À1 for V3 under FP as high as the yield of 3.07kg grain mm À1 ha À1 for V1 and V4 under PD2. The interaction effect of PD2 with V1 and PD2 with V4 varieties had 67% WP IR over FP with V3 (Table 6). Tuong et al. (2005) noted that the water productivity of rice concerning total water input (irrigation plus rainfall) ranges from 0.2 to 1.2 kg grain m À3 water. Similar observation reported by Pascual and Wang (2017) rice water productivity of irrigation plus rainfall water input ranges from 0.16 to 0.63 kg grain m À3 water. Smith et al. (1985) reported that water stress occurs at crop anthesis, which causes decreasing water productivity.Under dryland situations where crops depend on unpredictable seasonal rainfall and moisture stress which is in lower water use efficiency (Blum, 2005). Under dryland situations, crops depend on unpredictable seasonal rainfall and moisture stress which is in lower water use efficiency.This study indicated that the low WP IR of farmers' fields (FP) with rice varieties compared with well managed and irrigation supported (PD1 and PD2) in line with rice varieties plots had higher irrigation water productivity. GY, grain yield t/ha; AGB, above-ground biomass t/ha; HI, Harvest index; FP, farmers practice; TWOI, transplanted but not irrigated; SAT, transplanted and irrigating to saturation level; PD1, transplanted and ponding to 1 cm water; PD2, transplanted and ponding to 3 cm water; V1, X-Jigna; V2, Edget; V3, Hiber; V4, Fogera-1; V5, Nerica-4. Means in the Table for the same parameter followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different from each other at a 5% level of significance.Table 7 shows that the incremental irrigation water productivity (IWP IR ) data showed the additional grain yield increase over farmers' practice (dry planted rainfed rice) and transplanted but not irrigated across varieties per unit water applied. The IWP IR varied between irrigation x varieties from the lowest of 1.91 kg ha -1 mm -1 for the SAT over TWOI (SAT-TWOI with V1) to the highest yield of 8.36 kg ha À1 mm À1 for PD2 over FP (PD2-FP with V1). V1 grown under PD2 gave the highest (8.36 kg ha À1 mm À1 ) IWP IR which is 4 times higher than the values for V1, V2, and V3 grown under TWOI and the value V1 grown under FP (Table 7). IWP IR is an increase in the amount of the product (compared with no irrigation) over the volume of supplementary irrigation water (Cabangon et al., 2003). The present result implies that the primary factors for water productivity on the two production systems (farmer practice) and (transplanted but not irrigated) were a shortage of water during the terminal stage of the crop due to dry spell occurrence rather than other environmental factors in Fogera Plain.The partial budget analysis was conducted to evaluate the economic feasibility of the two years average of the different water regimes with rice varieties over two years of field price data. The results of the partial budget analysis showed that the highest net benefit (65, 550ETB) was obtained from the application of PD2 with V1, followed by PD1 withV4 had a medium level net benefit (NB) (60,750 ETB ha À1 ) while TWOI with V3 gave the lowest net benefit (33, 500 ETB ha À1 ) (Table 8). If the crop cycle is longer than 4-5 months and the proposed practice is new to farmers for a treatment to be considered meaningful to farmers with 100% the minimum acceptable rate of return (CIMMYT, 1988). The water regimes of rice varieties combination of FP with V4, SAT with V4, PD1 with V1, PD1 with V4, PD2 with V1 had met the requirement. However, the highest MRR (2000%) was recorded from the application of PD1 with V4, followed by PD2 with V1 had a medium MRR (300%) whereas SAT with V4 gave relatively low MRR (28%) (Table 8). As Table 6. The interaction effect on water regimes and varieties of irrigation water productivity/WP IR /(kg grain ha À1 mm À1 ). FP, farmers practice; TWOI, transplanted but not irrigated; SAT, transplanted and irrigating to saturation; PD1, transplanted and ponding to 1 cm water; PD2, transplanted and ponding to 3 cm water; V1, X-Jigna; V2, Edget; V3, Hiber; V4, Fogera-1; V5, Nerica-4. described by CIMMYT (1988), the recommendation is not (necessarily) based on the highest MRR. As long as the MRR between two treatments exceeds the minimum acceptable rate of return, the change from one treatment to the next should be attractive to farmers. Thus, as presented in Table 8, PD2 with V1 has shown the highest net benefit (65,550 ETB) with an acceptable level of MRR (300%) and best recommended for rice production in Fogera Plain. Moreover, PD1 with V4 treatment could be also recommended as an alternative technology for local farmers. In line with this result, Sharma et al. (2010) reported that water harvesting and supplementary irrigation are economically viable and possibly increase by 50% for crop production. ETB, Ethiopian Birr; AGY, adjusted grain yield; TVC, total variable cost; NB, net benefit; MRR, marginal rate of return; D, dominated treatments; FP, farmers practice; TWOI, transplanted but not irrigated; SAT, transplanted and irrigation to saturation; PD1, transplanted and ponding to 1 cm water; PD2, transplanted and ponding to 3 cm water; V1, X-Jigna; V2, Edget; V3, Hiber; V4, Fogera-1; V5, Nerica-4.Insufficient rainfall during the reproductive growth stages limits rice production across the rice ecosystem in Fgera Plain. The present study shows that combination effect water regimes (PD2 and PD1) and rice varieties had a significant increase in grain yield, above-ground biomass, harvest index, and irrigation water productivity (WP IR ) compared with farmers practice (FP) and with rice varieties. Moreover, a combination of 3 cm ponding water regime with X-Jigna (V1) and 1 cm ponding water regime with that of Fogera-1 (V4) rice varieties was found to be a higher net benefit and marginal rate of return identified for dry spell stress environment implying that the profitability is captured. Therefore, the identified irrigation period from mid of September to the first week of October should be applied in the form of supplemental irrigation at the reproductive stages of rice. The system of rice supplemental irrigation and a minimum depth of water aims to make rainfed rice cultivation more sustainable and profitable, as it not only enhances grain yield and net income but also saves considerable amounts of water. It is concluded that for efficient water management and minimization of dry spell risks, ponding to 3 cm ponding depth (PD2) with X-Jigna (V1) and 1cm ponding depth with Fogera-1 (V4) rice varieties at reproductive growth stages are recommended for study areas. However, a few more years' data over locations data are needed to see the combined effect of irrigation with rice varieties response on grain and biomass yield, profitability, and irrigation water productivity of rice.Tesfaye Molla: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.Kindie Tesfaye; Firew Mekbib; Tamado Tana; Tilahun Taddesse: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3392618832.json b/main/part_2/3392618832.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0176feab75209a2b22cb740fb60f65bebd529448 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3392618832.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"dfd8101cffdd5dbab200c1739a197dca","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/aef049d4-bf39-4547-80e2-ce30a942874e/content","id":"1287546814"},"keywords":["1 Estrategia y manejo experimental 5","2 Ensayos en el primer ciclo 5","2","1 Ensayos exploratorios 5","2","2 Ensayos de nivel","52","2","1 Tipo de herbicidas por dosis 5","2","2","2 Tipo de herbicidas par epocas","5","2","2","3 Niveles de nitrogeno y fosforo : 5","3 AmH","isis agronornico, estadistico y econom","ico de los resultados obtenidos por grupos de ensayos","5","3","1 Ensayos exploratorios 5","3","2 Ensayos de nivel","5","3","2","1 Tipo de herbicidas por dosis \" 5","3","2","2 Tipo de herbicidas por epocas de aplicacion 5","3","2","3 Fertilizantes 5","4 lntegracion global de resultados y derivacion de recomendaciones 1","2","2 Fertilizantes 6","1","2","3 Pruebas del efecto residual del Gesaprim 80 83 6","2","2","2 Fertilizantes 6","2","2","3 Efecto residual de la atraz","ina sobre el cultivo de frijol 6","3 Integracion global de resultados y derivacion de recomendaciones","CAPITULO 7 7","2","2 Ensayos de nivel 7","2","2","1 Herbicidas par densidad 7","2","2","2 Fertilizantes 7","2","2","3 Parcelas de verificaci6n 7","2","2","4 Parcelas demostrativas de cero labranza 7","3 Integraci6n global de resultados y derivaci6n de"],"sieverID":"6e44805f-d07d-4c61-bb42-69c12cd2a953","content":"EI Instituto de Investigacion Agropecuaria de Panama (IDIAP) fue creado por Ia Ley No. 51 del 28 de agosto de 1975. Es una entidad estatal que nonna todas las actividades de investigacion agropecuaria del sector publico y tiene como objetivos principales aumentar la produccion y productividad, as! como el nivel de ingreso de los productores agropecuarios, con enfasis en los pequeiios productores. Es un organo de consulta del Estado en la formulacion y aplicacion de politicas cientificas y tecnologicas agropecuarias y sirve como organismo de apoyo a la enseiianza y capacitacion tecnica a todos los niveles del Sector Agropecuario. La aCClOn investigiltiva del IDIAP en Caisdn, Provincia de ChiriquI', se caracteri;:;a porque se generan y validan tecnologlas en las propias fin cas de los agricultores. Los problemas de la produccion se identifican mediante encuestas efectuadas en el drea )' las investigaciones se ejecutan can la participaci6n activa del productor, quien canoce y opina a medida que se desarrollan los experimentos en su pareela.Los cultivos principales de Caisdn SOil malz y porato. En este inforllle se presentan resultados de tres aFios de investigacion en malz. Se describe la metodologfa utilizada y se destacan los logros obtenidos en este corto p erlo do. El asesoramiento del Centro Intemacional para el Mejoramiento de Malz y Trigo (CIM.MYT) ha sido signi[zcativo para disef'iar el metodo de trabajo y orientar las acciones de investigacion. Es un ejemplo de cooperacion tecnica que ha rendido frutos positivos.Entre los COl\\'1pOnentes tecnol6gicos que se inJiestigaron se concluy6 que el lzerbicida pre-emergente A trazina es efectivo para combatir las malezas, que el abonamiento no es un factor limitante de la produccion debido al alto grado de fertilidad natural y que el sistema de cero labranza agi/iza la siembra y es un metodo valioso para reducir la erosion y los costas de preparacion del terreno. El combate de los insectos del suelo y la siembra en hi/eras para obtener la densidad optima de plantas por unidad de area vii viii son muy importantes para asegurar altos rendimientos. El agricultor reconoce las ventajas del uso de estas practicas y como resultado del sistema de trabajo en Caisan, la mayorfa de elias se usan ampliamente en el area. En consecuencia, los rendimientos del mafz han aumentado considerablemente e igualmente los beneflcios economicos para los productores.Cabe anotar que el caso de Caisan ha sido considerado a nivel intemacional como uno de los mejores ejemplos existentes en America Latina y el Caribe del desarrollo de tecnologias apropiadas a traves del eSfuerzo conjunto investigador-productor. Este documento constituye una narracion de los hechos que con orgullo presentamos a nuestros lectores.Dr. Rodrigo Tarte P.Director General La estrategia institucional del IDIAP considera el trabajo de investigacion en produccion dirigido hacia areas especificas del pais como condicion necesaria para el desarrollo de tecnologias adecuadas a las condiciones en que se desenvuelven los agricultores. En el marco de esta orientacion de la investigacion se desarrolla a partir de agosto de 1978, el \"Programa de Investigacion en Produccion de Maiz y Poroto. Etapa Inicia!: Caisin\", que cuenta con la colaboracion del CIMMYT. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar a la consideracion de los colegas del sector agropecuario, la naturaleza y primeros resultados de este prograrna, enfatizando ciertos aspectos que entendemos resultan innovativos con respecto a la tradicion de investigacion agricola en Panama, y como tal pueden tener implicaciones metodologicas de interes para los Programas Nacionales de Investigacion de otros paises de la regi6n.El area seleccionada para 1a prirnera etapa de este programa (Caisin) comprende una superficie de alrededor de 10 mil hectlireas ubicadas en el extrema centro oriental de Panama. Desde el punto de vista de produccion agricola, el sistema de cultivo mas importante en la zona esta constituido por una rotacion de maiz en prirnera coa, seguido de poroto en segunda coa. En 1978/79 cerca del 70% de los productores de la zona seguian este patron de cultivo.Los aspectos del programa que vale 1a pena resemr son:1. El punta de partida del programa de investigacion esta dado por el conocimiento de las circunstancias de los agricultores representativos.• Ingeniero Agrbnomo, IDIAP •• Economista, CIMMYT.x 2. Este conocimienh es sistematizado a traves de un sondeo informal y mis tarde de una encuesta formal de producci6n, disefiada expresamente para contribuir a la defmici6n del programa de investigacion en campos de agricultores (defmici6n del Dorninio de Recomendaci6n).3. Lo precedente enfatiza mas que los aspectos descriptivos del area y los productores, aquellas cuestiones instrumentales para el prograrna de investigaci6n. Es decir, a partir de las pnicticas prevalecientes en los cultivos objetivos (mafz y poroto), intenta detectar cuales son los problemas de producci6n cuya eventual superaci6n pudiera tener mayor impacto en la productividad e ingresos del productor, y cuaIes serian las altemativas tecnol6gicas que se intentaria desarrollar y validar como respuesta a estos problemas.4. A traves de este proceso se defmen, en el caso del cultivo de maiz, un minimo de cuatro componentes tecnol6gicos a ser incorporados como variables experimentales en la investigaci6n: (a) control de malezas; (b) poblaci6n con metodo de siembra (\"mateado vs. siembra en hilera); (c) nitr6geno; y (d) f6sforo.5. Estos cuatro componentes son ordenados en dos grupos de acuerdo con el horizonte temporal dentro del cual se plantea la investiga-ci6n en cada uno de ellos; la naturaleza del problema que pretende resolver, y el grado de prioridad con que son asurnidos.6. En un horizonte de corto plazo, en primera prioridad, se ubican los componentes (a) y (b) para los cuales se espera formular recomendaciones en un periodo no mayor de dos afios. Esto surge del aruilisis \"ex-ante\" realizado en la zona y esta basado fundamentalmente en dos hip6tesis. Por un lado, que habria amplio margen de incremento en la productividad e ingresos con factibilidad econ6rnica (a priori) en este grupo de altemativas tecnol6gicas a desarrollar. Por otro lado, no se esperan en este grupo problemas de politica agropecuaria 0 disponibilidad de insumos asociados con estas altemativas tecnol6gicas.7. Lo precedente tiene, entre otras, implicaciones para la conduc-ci6n de los experimentos. En los ensayos que incorporan control de malezas y densidad como variables experimentales, la naturaleza y nivel de las variables no experimentales se establecen de acuerdo con las pnicticas de cultivo prevalecientes en el area (practica del productor).8. En un horizonte de mediano plazo, y en segunda prioridad se ubican los componentes (c) y (d) correspondientes a los problemas xi de fertilidad. La naturaleza del problema es en este caso un tanto mas compleja. Si bien los productores estan familiarizados con el uso de fertilizantes, las ~ecomendaciones que acompafian a los programas crediticios y las ordenes de compra respectivas se realizan sobre formulas completas que no necesariamente sedan las mas adecuadas para las circunstancias de produccion del area.Por otra parte, desde el punto de vista de las empresas distribuidoras de insumos, Caisan representa un mercado residual frente a la cercania del area papera mas importante de Panama (Cerro Punta). Por ultimo, en el plano agronomico el area parece contar al presente con alta fertilidad natural del suelo (zona de produccion relativamente reciente), 10 cual puede condicionar en el corto plazo la respuesta a fertilizantes quimicos. 9. Los ensayos de fertilizantes (horizonte de mediano plaw) suponen que los productores han adoptado las alternativas tecnol6gicas en control de malezas y densidad, y consecuentemente, las variables no experimentales cor.espondientes a estos componentes son fijadas a los niveles considerados optimos, de acuerdo con la informacion disponible.10. La estrategia de disefio experimental incluye en la etapa inicial un ensayo de caracter exploratorio que analiza integralmente con un arreg10 factorial 2\", efectos principales e interacciones de los cuatro componentes tecnologicos considerados frente a la pnictica del agricultor. Este se completa con los ensayos de \"niveles\", incluyendo tipos de herbicidas, dosis de aplicacion y niveles de nitrogeno y fosforo, conducidos con los criterios ya descritos.11. Por Ultimo, con e1 objeto de moderar los problemas de acame detectados en la wna, se desarrolla un modesto programa de mejoramiento cuyos objetivos estan estrictamente acotados a bajar la altura de la Variedad Local.xii que existen elaras oportunidades de desarrollar, en los componentes control de malezas y densidad, altemativas tecnologicas de produccion de maiz, viables para los productores representativos del area.Por otra parte, visto que los ensayos de nivel de herbicidas por dosis resultan cualitativa y cuantitativamente consistentes con los ensayos exploratorios y visto el amplio margen agronomico y economico obtenido con la altemativa de Gesaprim en todas las localidades, parece razonable pensar que el MIDA y el IDIAP pueden extractar en forma conservadora, recomendaciones en este componente para el area en cuestion. xiii son, y asumiendo que el productor adoptani practicas mejoradas de control de malezas y densidad, el incremento de rendirnientos est.i lejos de compensar los costos en que debe incurrirse para la compra y aplicaci6n de los nutrientes quimicos. Tanto la incorporacion de nitrogeno fosfoTO separadamentc, como su utilizacion conjunta, resulta en retornos econ6micos negativos, aun a partir de las pnieticas mejoradas de cultivo.Vista la diversidad de problemas que hemos encontrado asociadas con el uso de nutrientes quimicos (produccion, disponibilidad del insumo, polftica crediticia), la investigaci6n en estos componentes fue ubicada ell u horizonte de mediano plaza. Si bien, los resultados obtenidos pueden relacionarse con ciertas caractedsticas de nuestro Dominio de Recomendacion, y considerando ademas que resulta un tanto prematuro en este caso avanzar conclusiones defmitivas, podemos, sin embargo, adelantar cierta cautela en la ormulacion de recomendaciones de cllalquier nivel positivo de nutrientes hasta tanto tengamos mayor informacion sobre las relaciones agronomicas potenciales con estos insumos en el area (n6t se que los programas de cn §dito incluyen fertilizantes en dosis de 3 a 4 quintales de f6nnula completa 10-30-10 6 12-24-12 por hectarea, aproximadamente 18 kg de nitrogenu, 55 kg de fosforo y 18 kg de potasio).xiv Gramoxone como un complemento y/o la altemativa al uso del Gesaprim 80. Decision basad a en la eficiencia obtenida por este producto en el control de las malezas en el ciclo del poroto y p r los bajos costos relativos del producto.Los resultados de estos ensayos son consistentes con ]a informaci6n generada en el ciclo anterior con relacion a las variables densidad y fertilizantes. Asi mismo, el analsis combinado para el sistema Jabranza confirma la hip6tesis que la variable \"cero labranza\" no afecta significativamente la producci6n; sin embargo, el analisis econ6mico de este componente implica una reduccion de costos del orden del 44% de la altemativa \"cera labranza\" con relacion a la labranza convencional. Reduccion referida al contraste de los costos inmediatos de labranza sin considerar los costos de erosi6n asociados con la labranza cOfivencional, erunarcandose aS1, como alternativa de gran potencial para la zona frente al sistema convencional de labrama mecanizada.En base a la IDfonnacion generada en los diferentes ensayos exploratorio y de niveles realizados en los cic1 s anteriores se program6 realizar parcelas de verificacion de resultados a fin de evaluar las mejores alternativas tecnol6gicas que van surgiendo con el objeto de comprobar su viabilidad conjunta frente a la practica del agricultor.Cabe destacar que las condiciones c.li.rrulticas a 10 largo del desarrollo vegetativo del cultivo fuecon ad versa , sequias en la fase inicial e intermedia del cultivo, fuertes ataques de insectos del suelo del genero Phyllophaga sp y una alta incidencia de Helminthosporium sr caracterizan el ciclo, situacion que ha afectado la confiabilidad de la informacion generada en este ciclo.Los resultados de los ensayos exploratorios indican que la variable conlrol de insectos del suelo mostro una alta tasa de retorno marginal. De esta forma, el uso de inseeticidas sent una medida adecuada para asegurar una buena poblacion inicial de plantas, cuya importancia para el productor dependeni de la incidencia de este tipo de ataque para que se justifique sus aplicaciones.Los resultados de las parcela de verificacion que combinan las mejores alternativas que han surgido de los ensayos exploratorios y de niveles, indican superioridad economica para la altemativa que incluye: cera labranza, control quimico de malezas con Gesaprim 80 en pre, a razon de 2 kg/ha, sin aplicaci6n de fertilizantes y empleando una densidad de 50,000 plantas/ha, en relacion al resto de las altemativas estudiadas, incluso la practica del agricultor; pero esta ventaja mas que inducir impacto en los rendimientos, esta asociado con reducciones de los costos de produccion por hectarea (incorporacion de Cero Labranza y no aplicaci6n de fertilizantes).Sintetizada la metodologia implementada y los resultados experimentales obtenidos, resulta importante destacar que el programa de investigacion desarrollado en Caisan es fundamentado en el principio que la mejor garantia para la adopci6n de tecnologia es asegurar que las circunstancias del agricultor esten incorporadas desde el inicio del proyecto en la estrategia experimental; en esta forma, la experiencia metodol6gica de Caisan brinda evidencia de las bondades de los procedimientos de investigaci6n utilizados. .La velocidad con que las altemativas tecnologicas generadas han sido adoptadas nos da una clara indicaci6n del grado de adecuaci6n de las mismas a las circunstancias agroeconomicas prevalecientes para los productores representativos del area. Esta rapida aceptaci6n por parte del agricu1tor nos dice, no solamente que la tecnologia generada ha side agroecon6micamente viable para estos agricultores representativos, sino que ademas seguramente represent a una respuesta o soluci6n a un problema importante (prio ritario) de produccion, que estos productores estaban enfrentando.Completando los elementos precedentes, restarian consideraciones xvi sobre la eficiencia de costos de este enfoque metodol6gico de investigacion. Esta eficiencia puede sintetizarse en la tasa de retorno social para la inversi6n del IDIAP en la implementaci6n de Catsan. La evaluaci6n del programa, realizada en 1982 provee esta infonnacion(.l). A menos de cuatro anos de haber comenzado con el proyecto y aun suponiendo que no hubiera mas adopcion, que la ya lograda en 1982, los retomos sociales regionales (que basicamente acrecieron a productores del area) SUpel1lD con creces la inversion del IDIAP para el programa de investigacion en fincas.Estos resultados confuman la percepci6n basada en que el enfoque metodol6gico de investigacion en fmcas utilizado es eficiente en terminos de costo y adecuado para lIegar al productor con tecnologia apropiada en un horizonte de corto y mediano plazo.Por ultimo, la implicaci6n mas importante y global de este trabajo, es que el IDIAP ha ganado una considerable experiencia en el manejo de estos programas de investigaci6n que incorporan un enfoque restringido de sistemas y que intentan operativamente lIegar a desarrollar, en el menor tiempo posible, alternativas tecnol6gicas apropiadas para agricultores representativos del pais.Corresponde a las autoridades del IDIAP juzgar sobre las bondades y debilidades de esta metodologia de trabajo y en que medida puede ser aplicada en otras regiones del pais en fonna consistente, con la estrategia que en la actualidad orienta el acciona:-de la Instituci6n. El CIMMYT, por su parte, ya ha capitalizado esta experiencia (junto con otras provenientes de otras regiones del mundo) y espera poder contribuir a la ejecuci6n de programas similares en otros paises de nuestro continente.(1) Vease Juan C. Martinez y Gustavo Saln, \"Evaluacion Economica de los programas de investigacion en Fincas del IDIAP: EI caso del Programa de Caisan. Bonador, exclusivamente para discusion interna en CIMMYT e IDIAP. Noviembre, 1982.CAPITULO 11.1 El sector agropecuario en la economia panamena.Panama presenta caracteristicas propias que 10 diferencian claramente del resto de los paises del Istmo Centroamericano. Por un lado, el Canal de Panama, y el grado de apertura de la Economia posibilitan el desarrollo de un importante sector fmanciero y comercial orientado hacia el comercfO intemacional. Esto se refleja en el peso relativo del sector servicios en el Producto Bruto del pais (alre edor de un 65% en la actualidad; vease el Cuadro 1). P r otro lado, en 10 que se retiere aI sector agropecuario, su dotacion de recursos naturales en relacion con su poblacion (dos millones de habitantes) y la diversidad de las condiciones ecologicas prevalecientes en el pais 10 ponen en situacion potencial de poder satisfacer con la produccion intema las necesidades alimentarias crecientes de su poblacion. Sin embargo, esto se ha logrado s610 parcialmente. La superficie territorial de Panama (incluyen• do el area del Canal) es de 7.7 millones de hectareas de las cuales un 83%) pue e ser utilizado en actividades agropecuarias y forestales.Los programas por area 80n una condici6n necesaria para llegar al agricultor con tecnolog\"a apropiada. A partir de la decada del 60 se acrecienta la importancia relativa del sector servicios como resultado de la fuerte expansion de ciertas ramas de actividad tales como banca, seguros, fmanzas, comunicaciones, transportes, almacenaje y servicios de electricidad, gas, agua y alcantarillado (Cuadro 1). Estas ramas de actividad duplican su participaci6n en el Producto Bruto Intemo entre 1960 y 1977.Paralelamente, el sector agropecuario baja en el mismo perfodo su par-ticipaci6n en el Producto Bruto Intemo de un 23% en 1960 a un 16% en 1977. Baja tambien en este periodo la absorci6n de empleo por parte del sector de un 50% de la ocupaci6n total de mana de obra en 1960 a un 30% de la misma en 1977.1.2 La politica de granos basicos.Tanto los objetivos explicitos de politica agropecuaria como los instrumentos manejados en los ultimos afios indican que el Gobiemo Panamefio intenta incrementar la producci6n nacional de granos basicos para satisfacer las necesidades derivadas tanto de un consumo per capita en aumento como asi tambien de una creciente poblaci6n.La polftica de precios del gobiemo refleja claramente esta intencion de estimular la produccion de granos basicos y promover en estos rubros la sustituci6n de importaciones. En los primeros afios de la decada del setenta se producen importantes aumentos en los precios sosten de los granos basicos. Estos precios pasan entre 1970/71 y 1974/75, en maiz, de B/.85 a B/.188 por tonelada; en arroz de B/.II0 a B/.221 por tonelada; en poroto (Phaseolus vulgaris) de B/.220 a B/.990 por tonelada y en frijol de bejuco (Vigna sinensis) de 8/.160 a B/.600 por tonelada. La misma tendencia se verifica si se comparan los promedios del primcro y segundo quinquenio de 13 ultima decada, tal como puede observarse en cl Cuadro 2.La comparacion entre los valores promedio de las importaciones y los precios 50Sten dan en los casos de maiz y poroto una idea de la magnitud del subsidio derivad de 13 polftica de precios del gobierno(l). Por otra parle esta misma situacion nos da indicacion de que en el mediano plaza Ia eventual exportaci6n de estos productos no resulta factible para eJ pais, ya que los niveles de precios internacionales estan par debajo de los costas y/o precios internos de Panama. Esto pone un techo al ritmo de expansion de la produccion de grano basicos que puede concretarse sin deprirnir los precios recibidos por el productor. En el corto plaza este techo esta dado par la expansion de la demanda interna y par el margen existente de sustilucion de importaciones. Esta Ultima ha operado en distinto grado en los ru!HOS considerados, siendo pnicticamente total en el caso del arroz y de menor.magnitud para el mafz y poroto. EI sorgo merece mencion por ser un rubro enteramente nuevo en la producci6n y consumo nacional de granos basicos. Est explica la notable expansion que se observo en este cultivo. Por su part el consume de frijol de bejuco ha sido tradicienalmente abastecido par la preduc ion nacional. la politica de precio descrita se agrega el refuerze de las acciones del MlDA. el BOA y cl IMA, junto con I creacion del lOIAP n 1975, las cuales no solamente han promovido la produccion de estos rubros, sino tambien la redistribucion de ingresos hacia el productor. Con respecto a la evoluci6n de rendimientos podemos ver en el Cuadro que s610 se han producido aumentos de poca significaci6n en el periodo considerado. (2) Contraloria General de 1JI Republica de Panama. Direccion de CnmercioExterior.(3) Institulo de Mercadeo Agropecuario (lMA).(-) Toneladas metric.as., 5 ordenado su estrategia institucional y tecnologica en base a un conjunto de elementos que caracterizan en la actualidad el accionar de la entidad.E1 primer elemento esta constituido por la decision de llegar efectivamente al productor panamefio (en particular pequefios y medianos productores) con tecnologia apropiada a sus circunstancias de produccion. Es decir, el enfoque de la investigacion pretende tener sistematicamente en cuenta e ir incorporando operativarnente en todas las etapas de generacion y transferencia de tecnologia, las circunstancias agroeconomicas en que se desenvuelven los productores como condition necesaria para asegurar la relevancia empirica de la investigaci6n y consecuentemente, la viabilidad operativa de las tecnologias y recomendaciones que surjan de dicha investigaci6n.El segundo elemento esta dado por el enfoque por areas. Se intenta concentrar recursos en prograrnas orientados a encarar los problemas de produccion en areas y cultivos que hayan sido definidos como prioritarios. Esto pennite por un lade enfocar la investigacion en aquellos problemas mas importantes para el productor y por otro lado evitar la dispersion de los escasos recursos del IDIAP para lograr la masa critica necesaria en areas prioritarias. El trabajo por areas se plantea en fonna secuencial en el tiempo, de manera tal que sobre la marcha pueda irse ajustando la metodologia de investigacion en funcion de las experiencias realizadas, como asi tambien provey do entrenamiento en servicio a los cuadros tecnicos que se iran incorporando a la Institucion. El Programa de Investigacion en Producci6n de Maiz y Pocoto para el area de Caisan es precisarnente el primer programa del IDlAP que se ubica dentro de estos lineamiento y como tal es de esperar que sea intensamente analizado en teaninos de las experiencias metodologicas que pueda eventua1mente proveer.Resumiendo, el IDIAP considera el trabajo de investigacion n areas espedficas del pais como condicion necesaria para el desarrollo de tecnologlas adecuadas a las condiciones en que se desenvuelven los productores.CAPITULO 2Los criterios para La seleccioll de las areas prioritarias han sido basicamente(l): 1) El grada de ncentraci6n de explotaciones pequefias y med.ia-n3S en el area; 1) la medida en que se producen cn el area reng! es agropecuarios prioritarios dcntro del Plan NacionaJ de Desarrollo Agropecuario y3) el p tencial de dcsarroU tecnol6gico de corto y mediano plaza que se visualiz a priori que existe n la region.Entre 13s regione selcccionadas illicialrmmte para poner en practica el nuevo enfoque de investigaci6n del IDIAP se encuentra el distrito de Renacimienta. cn el extrema centro occidental del pais.2.1 £1 Distrito de Renacimiento. AnaUsis de informacion secundana 2.1.1 Ubicaci6n geografica EI Distrito de Renacimiento can una superficie de 57,9fIJ hectareas y una poblaci6n de 8,049 habitantes, se encuentra ubicado entre los 8 0 3' de latitud orte y 82 0 55' de longitud Oeste(:1). Lirnita al Norte con la Para una primera etapa de trabajo a realizar. el lDIAP seleccion6 el corregimiento de Caisan en 10 Prouincia de Chiriqui, Panama. Esta variacion de 1a altitud s bre e1 myel del mar establece diferencias de temperaturas y precipitacion, 10 que influye en el tipo de clima y cultivos prevalecientes en las zonas agropecuarias, predominando en los di~rentes corregimientos el bo que muy hUmedo tropical de transicion fresco.El regimen de lluvia de la zona descrita, se puede observar en el Cuadro 3, existen pcicticamente nueve meses del ano (matzo -noviembre) en los cuales se registran precipitaciones mensuales superiores a 100 rrun.EI promedio anual de precipitacion pluvial para las tres estaciones metereologicas ubicadas dentro de la zona en estudio, es aproximadamente de 4,000 mm.Las lluvias se inician a mediados del mes de marzo y se prolongan hasta fInes del mes de noviembre, iniciandose el periodo de la estacion seca desde inicios de diciembre hasta mediados de marzo. La intensidad del periodo lluvioso unido ala topografia que predomina en la zona (montafias escarpadas con pendientes del orden del 50% de declive) constituyen una limitante severa para las explotaciones agricolas de temporal.La temperatura promedio annal varia desde los 18 0 C hasta los 22 0 C, 10 cUal hace apta 1a region para los cultivos de maiz, POTOtO, cafe, hortalizas y ganaderia de leche en particular.Renacimiento presenta en general sue10s volcanicos, fertiles, profundos y generalmente pedregosos.£1 mapa de clasiftcacion de la capacidad agro16gica para el uso de los suelos (2), indica que predominan los melos que van desde la clase IV hasta la e1ase VIII, 10 que pennite deducir las limitaciones existentes para la pro-ducci6n agricola.(1) Decreto de Gabinete No. 296, Septiembre 9, 1970.(2) Atlas Nacional de Panama. Panama, 1975. Estadistica Panameiia, Metereologia, 1973Metereologia, -1978\". \". ...... o Las caracteristicas quimicas y fisicas aparecen en el Cuadro 4, estos indican que los suelos son fertiles, profundos, de textura franco arenosa con ,un alto contenido de materia orgamca, predominando en la fraccion arcilla el material al6fano amorfo y en las fracciones limosas el material de las cenizas volcinicas.Datos de Estadistica y Censo correspondientes al ano 1980, reportan para la zona en estudio una poblacion total de 10,633 habitantes que ocupan una superficie de 579.6 kil6metros cuadrados, 10 que representa una densi• dad de poblaci6n de 18 habitantes/k.il6metro cuadrado (Cuadro 5).Respecto a la poblaci6n econ6enicamente activa, la enisma fuente para 1970, indica que el 87% de los habitantes se dedican a las actividades agropecuarias, a la vez resulta muy pequefio el porcentaje de tierra que es explotada bajo el regimen de arrendamiento (menos de un 10%), la mayoria de las parcelas son trabajadas por sus duenos.El analfabetismo de la poblacion mayor de IO afios alcanza un porcentaje de 25%, uno de los mas elevados de la provincia de Chiriqui, si excIuimos los distritos de la poblacion indigena (San Felix, San Lorenzo y Tole) en los cuales el indice alcanza niveles superiores al 50%. Para el afio 1976, el Distrito contaba con un total de 33 escuelas que impartian conocimiento a un total de 2,284 escolares(l).Datos del ano 1970(2), indican para Renacimiento un total de 1,009 explotaciones dedicadas a los cultivos anuales y 800 a los cultivos permanentes. La enisma fuente indica que la actividad pecuaria juega un papel importante en la region, ya que existen 1,089 explotaciones con pastos que ocupan una vasta extension del Distrit0 , que por condiciones de topografia no se pueden dedicar a las explotaciones agricolas (Cuadro 6).La agricultura del Distrito presenta una diversidad de cultivos; sin embargo, la produccion de granos basicos resulta una de las principales actividades; y dentro de la enisma, la rotacion de los cultivos de maiz-frijol resulta uno de los sistemas de produccion mas comunes.En el Cuadro 7, se presenta la superficie, producci6n y renclimiento por hectarea de los granos mas importantes que se cultivan en el area. Se observa que se cultivan aproximadamente 2,000 hectareas de maiz y frijol. En terrninos generales, a pesar de existir en la zona una tradici6n en la explo- tacien de estos rubIOS, los rendimientos son bajos, en particular sin CODSideramos el potencial de produccion del area, asi como tambien 108 resultados de trabajos experimentales< 1) en los cuales se reportan rendimientos del orden de 4,000 kilos par hectarea de maiz y de I 000 par hectarea para poroto. Entre los cultivos permanentes cabe destacar que la producci6n de cafe, naranjas y aguacate ocupan un lugar importante en el panorama regional.En la actualidad, el Distrito cuenta con 133 kil6metros de carretera, de los cUales, el 35% es asfaltada y comunica a la comunidad de Volcan con la cabecera de Renacimiento (Rio Sereno) el resto es earIetera revestida transitable especialmente en la estaei6n seca, uniendo a Rio Sereno con Paso Canoa, region fronteriza en la Carretera lnteramericana.Generalmente, las vias que entrelazan los corregimientos 0 sus comunidades estan constituidas par earninos de herradura, 10 que dificulta considerablemente la aceesibilidad del transporte terrestre a los centros de produeeion.Uno de los earninos de penetraci6n mas importante en el area 10 constituye la via Volcan-Caisan-Bugaba carretera que actualmente se esta ampliando y que permitira eomunicar el corregimiento de Caisan con e1 Distrito de Bugaba a traves del corregirniento de Santa Cruz; ala vez se estan realizando otras obras de infraestructura que comunicaran en forma permanente los corregimientos del distrito.Esto perrniti.cl incorporar a carta plazo nuevas zonas productivas a la explotaci6n agropecuaria, ampliando as! 13 f ntera de producci6n e incorporandolas a los mercados de consumo.2.2 Seleccibn del area de trabajo. El corregimiento de Caisan.Para una primera etapa del trabajo a realizar en el Distrito de Renacirniento, el IDIAP selecciono el corregimiento de Caisan. Las razones para tal eleecion son Msicamente las siguientes: i.Prevalencia en e1 area de explotaciones pequeflas yy medianas; la mayor parte de ellas agrupadas en 3 Juntas Agrarias, contindose con el apoyo de otras entidades del sector IDA, BDA, ENDEMA).ii.Importancia relativa en esta zona de los cultivos de maiz y poroto. ......iii.El potencial del area, basado en las condiciones agroeco16gicas la existencia de tierras aptas aun no utilizadas y la existencia de proyeetos viales para el area, en la actualidad parcialmente ejecutados, que permitirian asegurar la salida de los productos de la zona hacia los mercados de conswno (haciendo posi.ble 1a ocupacion de nuevas tierras agricolas).iv.La existencia en Caisan de un incipiente trabajo en mm (parcelas demostrativas simples) que pennitiria brindar una idea parcial y preliminar, de relaciones agronomicas en el area.El corregimiento de Caisin tiene una extension de 10,000 hect2 mm en diámetro), la temperatura de inducción y regeneración de las plantas (> 26°C), la clase y concentración de reguladores de crecimiento (2,4-D > 2 mgll), concentración de suerosa en el medio de inducción {> 6% l, concentración de sales en el medio de cultivo ( de uninucleado tardío. Figura 4D) (Chen et al., 1991). Así. la propia manipulación de estos factores. puede también ayudar a minimizar la frecuencia de producción de albinos.Las condiciones de crecimiento de las plantas donantes, tales como el fotoperíodo. la intensidad de luz. la temperatura. la nutrición mineral. variaciones estacionales.tratamientos físicos y la aplicación de hormonas pueden influir en la respuesta de las microsporas al cultivo in vitro (Chen et al., 1991).Por lo general, anteras de plantas desarrolladas en el campo y bajo períodos de baja nubosidad y lluvia presentan una mayor respuesta debido a los altos niveles radiacionales. Nuestros resultados de dos años de estudio muestran que la respuesta del arroz tipo fndica es altamente afectada por los niveles radacionales recibidos durante los dos últimos meses antes de cosechar las anteras. mientras que las japónicas son mas afectadas durante todo el período de crecimiento (Figura 7).Anteras de plantas desarrolladas a bajas temperaturas (1S120oC noche/día) son más afectadas que aquellas a altas temperaturas (30-3SoC). Pero anteras de plantas crecidas a temperaturas superiores a los 30°C tienden a producir un mayor porcentaje de plantas albinas (Chen et al .• 1991). Las condiciones óptimas para el crecimiento de las plantas es 19/29°C noche/día (Ying. 1986). En algunos casos la deficiencia de nitrógeno en las plantas donantes incrementa la respuesta al cultivo in vitro de las anteras, y la aplicación de gametocidas a las panículas en sus estados iniciales de desarrollo puede tambi6n resultar en una mayor respuesta (Chen et al., 1991).En observaciones realizadas a los granos de polen maduros contenidos en las anteras del arroz. se han identificado dos tipos de granos de polen con diferencias morfológicas y fisiológicas. Este factor diferencial denominado dimorfismo del polen, consiste en que algunos granos presentan el estado morfológico normal. pero otros.considerados anormales, son de menor tamaño, con tinción d6bil del citoplasma y generalmente presentan divisiones anormales similares al proceso de división que se presenta cuando se cultivan los granos de polen en un medio de cultivo in vitro. A los granos de polen anormales se los ha denominado granos-s o granos-p y se cree que son los responsables de la proliferación celular que da como resultado la formación de callos cuando se someten las anteras al cultivo in vitro. Su presencia dentro de la población de polen está predeterminada por las condiciones ambientales bajo las que se desarolla el cultivo y el estado fisiológico de las plantas donantes (Hebede Bors, 1985).El estado fisiológico de la planta donante justo en el momento en que se cosechan las panículas tambi6n influye en los resultados obtenidos. Nuestras investigaciones lndican que las anteras de las primeras inflorescencias, cosechadas en días soleados, y entre 8 a.m. y 10 a.m. tiene~ una mayor capacidad de respuesta que las que provienen de la etapa final de la floración y cosechadas en días lluviosos y/o después de las 10 a.m. Estas diferencias pueden estar asociadas con la viabilidad de las microsporas en el momento de cosechar las anteras (Chen et al., 1991).El estado de desarrollo del polen en el momento en que se separan las anteras para someterlas al cultivo in vitro, es un factor clave para asegurar una respuesta exitosa.En estudios comparativos y en la práctica se ha determinado que la etapa de desarrollo del polen comprendida entre el estado uninucleado medio y el uninucleado tardío es la óptima para asegurar una respuesta exitosa (Chen, 1977) (Figura 4C -D).Si la siembra de las anteras en el medio nutritivo se realiza cuando el estado de desarrollo del polen está en una etapa anterior o posterior a las mencionadas, la producción de callos decrece notablemente.Por muchos años se mantuvo la práctica rutinaria de aislar las flores de la planta donante, separar sus anteras e inmediatamente colocarlas bajo condiciones definitivas de incubaci6n. Sin embargo, en los últimos 20 años esta práctica se ha modificado al descubrir que al someter las anteras a un tratamiento de bajas temperaturas antes de sembrarlas en el medio de cultivo. se incrementa la producción de callos significativamente. En la actualidad ésta es una práctica esencial dentro de la técnica utilizada para el cultivo de anteras.Los efectos del pretratamiento a bajas temperaturas sobre la respuesta del cultivo de anteras de arroz han sido estudiados por varios investigadores. No existe un efecto significativo cuando el tratamiento es aplicado después que las anteras son cultivadas en el medio de inducción (Tsay y ehen, 1984). La inducción óptima se consigue con un pretratamiento de 8-10 o e por 7 días en la oscuridad en anteras con microsporas en estado uninucleado medio (Figura 4 e). Ese tratamiento no solamente incrementa la formación de callo, pero también la diferenciaci6n de plantas verdes. Un pretratamiento en frío por más de 14 días reduce la capacidad morfogenética de los callos e incrementa la producción de albinos (Tsay y ehen, 1984).Las investigaciones en la fisiología de las anteras han revelado que los efectos benéficos del tratamiento con frío y en ausencia de luz, consisten en reducir la actividad respiratoria de las anteras al disminuir el consumo de materiales, lo cual prolonga la actividad biológica del arquesporio que alberga a los granos de polen, manteniendo su viabilidad, evitando la dehiscencia prematura de las anteras en el cultivo, y retrasando la senescencia del polen (Suderland. 1978). Actualmente se piensa que el pretratamiento en frío promueve la inhibición de la expresión de genes y/o de la función de las enzimas producto de esta expresión. los cuales son responsables por el desarrollo gametofftico, permitiendo el cambio al desarrollo esporofftico (Chen et al., 1991).Aunque existen otros tratamientos físicos como el pretratamiento a altas temperaturas, las irradiaciones con rayos gamma a las anteras o a las semillas que dan origen a las plantas donantes. y la aplicación de químicos tales corno colchicinaAunque la iniciación de la división de las microsporas puede ser independiente de aditamentos nutricionales, éstos son requeridos para las subsecuentes divisiones que conllevan a la formación del callo, y la diferenciación de estas células en embriones y plantas. Normalmente se utilizan dos medios de cultivo, uno para la inducción de callos a partir del polen inmaduro, y otro para la regeneración de plántulas a partir de los callos.Los medios de cultivo están constituidos por dos grandes grupos de sustancias. El primer grupo, o medio basal, está formado de nutrimentos inorgánicos (macro y microelementos), hidratos de carbono, vitaminas y en algunos casos otros aditivos orgánicos. El segundo grupo de sustancias lo constituyen los reguladores de crecimiento de tipo hormonal. Varios laboratorios han tratado de optimizar la composición de los medios de cultivo para el CA de arroz, pero en ocasiones las conclusiones difieren unos de otros. Estas diferencias pueden deberse a la influencia que ejercen el genotipo, el estado de desarrollo del polen y el pretratamiento en frío dado a las anteras. Sin embargo, éstu no resta la importancia que tiene la composición del medio de cultivo, ya que es común que para un mismo genotipo, la• frecuencia de inducción varíe seglln la composición del medio.El crecimiento y la diferenciación de los callos está influenciado por las concentraciones de sales inorgánicas, especialmente las de amonio, por ésto la relación entre la concentración de amonio (NH/l y de nitrato (N0 3 'l es uno de los principales factores en la composición del medio. La formación del callo de microsporas de arroz y otros cereales es inhibida por las altas concentraciones de amonio presentes en el medio básico MS. Basado en estas observaciones Chu et al.(1975) desarrollaron el medio básico N6, el cual contiene aprox.imadamente 113 de los niveles de amonio, el triple de fosfato, 1/3 de calcio, 112 de magnesio, 1/3 de cloruro, 1.5 veces de potasio, y el doble de sulfato con respecto al medio basal MS (Cuadro 2). Las vitaminas del medio basal satisfacen la necesidad que tiene el polen de cofactores enzimáticos. Usualmente en el medio N6 se adiciona ácido nicotínico (0.5 mgll), piridoxina (0.5 mgll), tiamina (1.0 mgll) y glicina (2 mgll) (Cuadro 2).El medio N6 ha sido ampliamente adoptado para el cultivo de anteras de arroz japónica. El tipo índica. sin embargo, tiene otros requerimientos nutricionales. Huang el al. (1981) encontraron que una modificaci6n del medio N6 que contiene la mitad del nivel de NH 4 +, dos veces la de P0 4 -Y 1/5 Mg 2 + (medio He2, denominado aquí N6m por contener otra composición hormonal) incrementa la frecuencia de inducci6n de callos y la regeneración de plantas verdes de genotipos índica, sugiriendo que este tipo de arroz es altamente susceptible al amonio y el magnesio.Estudios comparativos fueron realizados en el CIAT para determinar la composici6n óptima del medio basal para la inducción de callo, y su efecto sobre la regeneraci6n de plantas verdes de 22 genotipos índíca y 13 japónica comúnmente cultivados o utilizados en mejoramiento en LAC (Cuadro 3). La respuesta con los medios basales N6 y N6m fue comparada con la obtenida con el medio Papa-2 (Chen et al, 1978), previamente utilizado en el CIA T (Núñez et al.. 1989). El medio de papa está basado en el uso del extracto de papa suplementado con 2 a 4 veces niveles mas bajos de macronutrientes con respecto al N6 y N6m, sin micromutrientes y vitaminas. La inducci6n de callos y regeneración de plantas verdes de las índicas fue el doble en el medio N6m que en los medios N6 y Papa-2 (Figura 8). Las jap6nicas formaron callos en el medio de Papa -2. pero un incremento de 2 a 3 veces en regeneración de plantas verdes se observ6 con el N6 o N6m, respectivamente (Figura 9). El medio de Papa-2 no solamente produjo una senescencia tempranas de las anteras, sino que también indujo la diferenciación de un menor número de caHos. Resultados similares fueron obtenidos con un mayor número de genotipos utilizados en nuestro programa de mejoramiento (Cuadro 1). Modificaciones subsiguientes del medio N6m, conteniendo 231.5 mg/l (NH4)2S04' 3134 mgll KN0 3 , 540 mgll KH 2 P0 4 , micronutrientes del MS. y 2.5 mg/l vitaminas del N6 (medio NL, Cuadro 2) incrementó 3 veces la inducción de callos y 5 veces la regeneración de plantas verdes de arroz indica con respecto al N6m (Figura 8). La diferenciación de plantas de arroz japónica también incrementó cuando los callos se indujeron en el medio NL (Figura 9). Nuestros resultados también indican que una mayor inducción de callos es obtenida en medio líquido que en medio sólido.El medio MS (Cuadro 2) es el más utilizado para la diferenciación de plantas a partir de callos de anteras de arroz. En nuestro laboratorio se utilizan dos medios basales.El MS, que se caracteriza por un alto contenido de sales inorgánicas, y 112 MS, el cual contiene la mitad de las sales inorgánicas del MS, con excepción del MgS0 4 .7HzO, que se adiciona completo cuando se utiliza el Phytagel como agente solidificante para permitir su solidificación. El MS se emplea con callos que provienen del medio de inducción N6m, y 1/2MS para•callos inducidos en el medio NL, el cual contiene maltosa. El tipo de agente gelificante también influye en la regeneración de plantas, obteniéndose mejores resultados cuando se utiliza phytagel(1.8 gil) o gel-rite (1.5 gil) en comparación con agar. En el CIAT el Phytagel es el solidificante más utilizado.Los hidratos de carbono (azúcares) del medio basal satisfacen los requerimientos de moléculas de carbono como fuente de energía. Por lo general, altos niveles de suerosa son estimulantes para la inducción de callos de anteras de arroz.Concentraciones de 4% a 5% han sido recomendadas (Chen et al., 1991). En general . se requieren niveles más altos de sucrosa para la inducción que para la regeneración de plantas. Sucrosa al 3% en el medio de diferenciación es generalmente utilizada por la mayoría de los investigadores.Estudios realizados en nuestro laboratorio mostraron que un incremento significativo en la inducción de callo de genotipos indica recalcitrantes y japónica es obtenido cuando 5% suerosa es reemplazada por 5% maltosa (Figura 10). Maltosa 5% es más inductiva que 1 % o 3% (Figura 10). Investigaciones recientes indican que para algunos genotipos una mayor inducción de callos es obtenida con maltosa 8% ó 10%, pero lo más notable es que la producción de plantas verdes de callos inducidos a estas concentraciones es incrementada significativamente (Figura 10). Además de maltosa, otros carbohidratos fueron evaluados. Glucosa 5% inhibe la inducción de callos, y combinaciones de 2% maltosa con 3% manitol o 7% de almidón de arroz, o 2% suerosa con 3% ó 5% manitol son menos inductivas que 5% maltosa solamente.A diferencia de la inducción de callos, la substitución de suerosa por maltosa en el medio de regeneración no incrementa la formación de plantas verdes.Los constituyentes más cruciales en el cultivo de anteras de arroz son las auxinas y las citoquininas.Auxinas:Citoquininas:ANA (ácido naftaIenacéticol, 2,4-0 (ácido 2,4 diclorofenoxiacético),AlA (ácido indolacéticol, AlB {ácido indolbuúricol, Picloramo, Oicamba, AFA (ácido Fenilacéticol BAP (6-benzilaminopurina), 2 iP (N ó -2-iso penteniladenina), Kinetina (6-furfurilamonopurina), Zeatina, Thiadazuron.Las auxinas en concentraciones medias y altas actúan sinergfsticamente con las citoquininas en concentraciones bajas para el desarrollo de callos. Cuando se utilizan bajas concentraciones de auxinas se estimula el enraizamiento y las citoquininas en altas concentraciones favorecen el desarrollo de los brotes, tallos y hojas e inhiben el enraizamiento. Es muy importante realizar una combinaci6n de auxinas y citoquininas en una proporción de 1:4 6 de 1:2 para regenerar plantas enraizadas.El 2,4-0 como fuente de auxinas generalmente se utiliza para la inducción de callos, puesto que tiende a inhibir la organogénesis, a diferencia del ANA que además de favorecer la producción de callos no suprime la diferenciación posterior.El resultado de investigaciones realizadas en CA de arroz en varios laboratorios indican que: al es necesarlo incluir al menos una auxina y una citoquinina en el medio de inducción para obtener callos con alta capacidad morfogénica; b) Las auxinas 2.4 .. 0 y ANA son igualmente eficientes en la formación de canos; e)Estudios sobre los factores que afectan la formación de plantas verdes mostraron que una reducción de la concentración de suerosa del 3% al 2%, conjuntamente con la suplementación de 10 mgll putrescina (una poliamina), incrementan la diferenciación de plantas de un 30% a un 50% en un genotipo japónica secano frecuentemente utilizado como padre para adaptación a suelos acidos en nuestro programa de mejoramiento (Figura 12). Un mayor efecto de la putrescina es obtenido cuando el medio de regeneraciÓn contiene 2% suerosa. Observaciones preliminares mostraron que la reducción de suerosa del 3% al 2% en el medio de regeneración incrementa el numero de callos con puntos de diferenciación; sin embargo, solamente un 20% de éstos desarrollaban plantas. Ningún efecto ha sido observado en las endicas estudiadas. La putrescina incrementa la elongación de coleóptilos de arroz in vivo bajo condiciones anaeróbicas (Reggiani et al., 1989). Estos resultados sugieren que los bajos niveles de oxigeno dentro del envase de cultivo pueden ser inhibitorias para la diferenciación de plantas en genotipos de secano, pero no afectan aquellos adaptados a condiciones de inundación. Un mayor número de genotipos secano deben ser evaluados para establecer si la putrescina puede ser utilizada rutinariamente.Nuestras investigaciones sugieren que es posible incrementar la inducción de callos 24 veces en las indicas y 2 veces en las japónicas cuando se utiliza el medio de inducción NL complementado con 2 mgll 2,4-0, 0.07 mgll picloramo, 1 mgll kinetina. 5% maltosa y 10 mgll AgN03 (Cuadro 4) (Lentini el al., 1993). Callos inducidos en este medio muestran un aumento en formación de plantas verdes 16 veces para las indicas y 10 veces para las japónicas, cuando son diferenciados en 1/2 MS, I mgll ANA, 4 mgll kinetina, 3% suerosa, y 0.18 % phytagel. Un promedio del 60% de las plantas verdes son diploides (doble-haploides) en las índicas, y 41 % en las japónicas, resultando en un rendimiento de 46 doble-haploides por cada 100 anteras cultivadas tipo fndica, y 178 doble-haploides por 100 anteras japónicas. Este medio ha demostrado ser Óptimo para los 22 genotipos (ndica y 13 japónica evaluados (Figuras 8 y 9) Y un gran numero de genotipos procesados en nuestro laboratorio para la producción de líneas de mejoramiento (Lentini et al., 1993).Actualmente, se están realizando investigaciones para determinar si maltosa S-IO% puede ser empleada de forma rutinaria, 2,3,8 Las condiciones físicas de incubación para la inducción de callos y diferenciación de plantas La temperarura y la luz juegan un papel importante en la androgénesis (Maheshwari et al\" 1980), En arroz, la temperatura adecuada para los procesos de formación de callos y de regeneración de plantas está entre los 24 y 26°C, Con temperaturas por encima de 2SoC las anteras se degeneran rápidamellte, disminuyen la formación de callos y la tasa de regeneración de plantas, y aumenta la presencia de plantas albinas, La luz no es necesaria para la fase de inducción, y el crecimiento de los callos se favorece en la oscuridad, Una vez que los callos son transferidos al medio de regeneración, la luz es necesaria para el proceso de fotosíntesis en el desarrollo de las plantas verdes, El cambio de oscuridad a luz debe ser progresivo, primero exponiendo los callos a luz tenue de aproximadamente 40 )l E,m,2,s-l, y posteriormente a luz directa de SO a 100 )l E,m-2 ,s•l, Otros factores que influyen en la respuesta de la antera es la composición de la atmósfera del recipiente de cultivo (Johansson et al., 1982) y la densidad de las anteras inoculadas (Suderland et al\" 19S1); sin embargo, estos factores no han sido investigados en arroz (Chen et al\" 1991),Nuestras investigaciones muestran que el uso de nitrato de plata, un inhibidor de eilleno, incrementa la inducción de callos de genotipos índica, pero no tiene efecto en la diferenciación de plantas (punto 2,3,7.4), El efecto de la densidad de las anteras inoculadas también fue evaluada. El número de anteras fue incrementada de 25 anteras/mi medio líquido, densidad normalmente utilizada en nuestro laboratorio, a 50 anteras/mi medio, densidad óptima para cebada; sin embargo, la inducción de callo fue similar a ambas densidades, Promedio de al menos 3 replicaciones cada una de 3250. anteras I genotipo I tmtanllento.Un gran número de estudios teóricos y experimentales han sido realizados para definir las condiciones en las cuales el mejoramiento con DH puede ser de utilidad.particularmente para el desarrollo de variedades de cultivos autógomos. Estos estudios indican que el CA presenta ventajas y desventajas para su aplicación en mejoramiento. A continuación se presenta un análisis de las implicaciones genéticas y practicas del uso del CA. y algunos ejemplos en el desarrollo de líneas de mejoramiento adaptadas a los diferentes ecosistemas de arroz de América Latina y del Caribe.Puesto que cada grano de polen proveniente de plantas híbridas F 1 representa un gameto diferente. la población de las plantas DH exhibe la variabilidad genética que se encontrará en una generación F 2 • con la ventaja adicional que cada individuo tendrá un genotipo homozigoto. es decir. fijado defmitivamente.Cuando se aplica la técnica del cultivo de anteras se pueden obtener líneas homozigotas en sólo 8-9 meses. contabilizados a partir de la siembra de una generación híbrida FI o F 2 . Mientras que esta misma estabilidad se logra generalmente en el sistema estándar de mejoramiento después de 5 a 6 generaciones de autopolinización. Por consiguiente, las evaluaciones en ensayos de rendimiento pueden hacerse mucho antes. Esto representa un ahorro aproximadamente de un 30% de los costos con respecto al método estándar (Cuadro 7).El CA aumenta la eficiencia de selección tanto para caracteres cualitativos como para los cuantitativos, lo cual facilita la identificación de los genotipos superiores en comparación con la selección efectuada durante las generaciones tempranas en el sistema de pedigrí (Snape, 1989). La selección de individuos en una población F 2 es más efectiva cuando los alelos son dominantes. mientras que sí los alelos deseables son recesivos solo están presentes en una proporción (114)°. Por el contrario. en una población de DH los genotipos recesivos tienen una frecuencia de (t/2l. Esto facilita la selección de genes recesivos deseables ya que no existe el enmascaramiento de los genes recesivos por los dominantes. Teóricamente, si los padres del híbrido tienen \"n\" pares de alelos recombinando independientemente. para seleccionar un genotipo de una población Fz la eficiencia de la selección debe ser (l12)2n en el mejoramiento con doble haploides y (1/2)° en el mejoramiento con diploides. Esto indica que la eficiencia de selección en el mejoramiento con DH es 2 n veces más alta que aquella del mejoramiento con diploides (Baenziger y Schaeffer. 1983).Con base en esto algunos cultivares han sido seleccionados eficientemente a partir de poblaciones más pequeñas de plantas derivadas del polen de arroz. Se ha estimado que cerca de 150 plantas provenientes de cultivo de anteras de una F 1 son suficientes. en vez de 4.000 -5.000 plantas F 2 • para los propósitos de selección de los genotipos deseables (Shen et al., 1983). Tomando los niveles de respuesta obtenidos con el medio NL (Cuadro 4), es posible producir 150 OH cultivando 32.600 anteras indica y 8.427 anteras japónicas por cruzamiento.El aumento en la eficiencia de la selección mediante el cultivo de anteras se cuenta como una ventaja, especialmente cuando la variación de dominancia (variación debida a la desviación del heterocigoto a partir del valor medio parental y que no está presente en una línea homocigota) es significativa (Raina, 1989). Griffing (1975) demostró que las varianzas fenotípicas para poblaciones diploides y OH son:Diploides:En el mejoramiento convencional. las líneas en generación temprana (F 2 -F 4) muestran diferencias fenotípicas para las cuales contribuyen los efectos aditivo y de dominancia. En contraste. las líneas haploides dobladas solamente muestran varianza aditiva. por lo tanto alta heredabilidad debido a la eliminaci6n de los efectos de dominancia. Así. comparados con la población F 2 • menos plantas haploides dobladas se requieren para propósitos de selección de los recombinantes deseados (Raína.1989). A este respecto Baenziger y Schaeffer (1983). citaron el ejemplo hipotético de un cruce segregante para tres genes recesivos y para tres genes dominantes. Si los tres genes recesivos están siendo seleccionados. l/8 de la población de dihaploides será seleccionada. con respecto a un l/64 de la poblaci6n F 2 . Las líneas seleccionadas en ambos casos son homocigotas. En el caso que se haga selección para los tres genes dominantes. 1/8 de la población de dihaploides se seleccionará mientras que 27/64 de la población F 2 será seleccionada. En la población de dihaploides. todos los individuos son homocigotos. pero en la población F 2 de los 27/64 seleccionados con base al fenotipo. solamente 1164 es homocigoto. Si una familia segregante es seleccionada en la generación F). más evaluaciones serán necesarias en la F 4 Y en las generaciones más avanzadas para encontrar los homocigotos deseados.En las generaciones tempranas del sistema pedigrí la selección de caracteres cuantitativos es difícil debido a la presencia de dominancia. segregación intrafamíliar y competencia entre plantas. Por el contrario. en el sistema OH no existe dominancia y además hay el doble de la varianza aditiva entre los productos recombinantes de un cruzamiento con respecto a las F 2 y F3 equivalentes. Aún en caracteres con dominancia completa. la F3 no exhibe tanta varianza genética total como en una población OH y la varianza aditiva es solo la mitad. La variación ambiental entre plantas F¡ es probablemente mayor que entre F3 o OH; además. se puede incrementar el número de repeticiones con el fin de disminuir la varianza ambiental en los OH y de esta manera evaluar con mayor precisión el valor individual de cada OH (Snape. 1989). Por otra parte, las generaciones F3 o F 4 exhiben diferencias genéticas entre individuos dentro de las parcelas, en tanto que en las parcelas OH los individuos dentro de cada línea son genéticamente idénticos; esto facilita la selección visual de las mejores líneas en generaciones tempranas. Según Snape (1989) la heterocigosis y segregación dentro de las parcelas de pedigrí también afectan el grado en el cual la selección de individuos en una generación resul ta en la respuesta deseada en su progenie en la generación siguieme. Por el contrario, las líneas DH guardan una correlación igual a la unidad entre generaciones al ser genéticamente idénticas.Estas propiedades genéticas Ilnicas encontradas en la población DH comparada con generaciones tempranas generadas por métodos convencionales permiten efectuar una mejor discriminación entre cruzamientos y entre genotipos dentro de cruzamientos, y por consiguiente aumentan la probabilidad de avance genético y éxito en un programa de mejoramiento (Griffing. 1975;Snape. 1989). Por ejemplo. Jansen (1992) estimó las probabilidades de obtener un genotipo determinado a partir de un cruzamiento entre dos padres homocigolOs; para el caso de un carácter controlado por cinco loci no ligados encontró que se deben producir 95 líneas DH con el fin de garantizar que un genotipo específico esté presente por lo menos una vez con una probabilidad del 95%. En contraste, en el caso de pedigree se necesitarían evaluar 4 5 plantas. es decir, un total de 1024 plantas para encontrar un genotipo con los cinco loci (Briggs y Knowles, 1967}.Entre las más comúnmente citadas se tienen su alta dependencia del genotipo, el rango de la variabilidad genética recuperada, el limitado número de recombinaciones meióticas y el costo del laboratorio. provenientes de cuatro cruzamientos entre cultivares de riego y secano. Encontró que los DH originados a partir de la F 1 fueron superiores en términos de fertilidad y peso de 1.000 granos; y no hubo diferencias entre estas generaciones para los otros parámetros estudiados como altura. floración, número de granos por panícula y número de panículas por m 2 • En el caso de existir ligamento entre caracteres de importancia, se recomienda procesar la F 2 para incrementar la probabilidad de romper los ligamentos antes de utilizar el CA (Snape y Simpson, 1981).El costo inicial para establecer un laboratorio de CA incluyendo la infraestructura, equipo y reactivos puede ser relativamente alto. En un estudio económico sobre el uso del CA en el desarrollo de variedades de arroz, Martfnez et al. (1993) estimaron que un laboratorio con una capacidad para sembrar 5.500 anteras/semana, el laboratorio más pequeño y econ6micamente mas apropiado para la produccion masiva de DH para mejoramiento, tiene un costo inicial de aproximadamente US$45,OOO y un costo (\\peracional de US$2,000 por semestre. Sin embargo, al analizar la relación costolbeneficio del uso del CA en un programa de mejoramiento encontraron que su implementación puede reducir el costo de obtención de una variedad entre USS53,OOO y USS91,OOO, dependiendo del genotipo y del ecosistema considerados. Esta reducción representa un 30% de ahorro en comparación con el sistema de pedigrí.Con frecuencia se cuestiona la estabilidad y uniformidad de las plantas obtenidas por CA. Sin embargo, investigaciones realizadas por varios investigadores indican que más del 90% de los OH son uniformes y estables; aproximadamente un 8% de los OH presentan variaciones pequeñas en algunos caracteres de importancia agronómica, en tanto que el 0.7% presenta variaciones grandes (Raina, 1989). La estabilidad se mantiene a través de varias generaciones. La experiencia acumulada en CIAT desde 1986 concuerda con estas observacioues. Las variaciones o segregación observadas en los OH generalmente son ocasionadas por:Variación somática, es decir que el OH se obtiene a partir del tejido somático (la pared de la antera, el filamento, etc.), el cual es diploide y puede ser heterozigoto, y no de una microspora o célula haploide.Mutación inducida durante el proceso de formación del callo. La inducida antes del doblamiento cromosómico aparecerá como homocigota mientras que la inducida después será heterocigota.Hibridación espontánea. Generalmente las plantas R 1 presentan cierto grado de esterilidad, lo cual bajo condiciones de campo facilita la polinización cruzada resultando en un híbrido.Si bien las plantas DH son homozigotas y por consiguiente pueden pasar directamente a ensayos de rendimiento, no han sido evaluadas y seleccionadas previamente por otras características agronómicas como lo son resistencia a enfermedades, resistencia a insectos, calidad. tolerancia a distintos problemas edáficos. y adaptación a un ecosistema detenninado. Por consiguiente. la población DH representa el punto de partida para que el fitomejorador empiece su ciclo de evaluación y selección. Este proceso se diferencia bastante del que se sigue con el material genético desarrollado a través de los métodos estándar de mejoramiento, ya que generalmente cuando éstos llegan a la generación F s -F 6 ya han sido evaluados y seleccionados por una serie de características deseables. En otras palabras, el hecho de qne se obtengan lfneas DH no quiere decir que de por sí son variedades mejoradas superiores.El cultivo de anteras ha demostrado ser una técnica útil para acelerar la introgresión de características deseables en poblaciones de mejoramiento. En la literatura se encuentran reportadas un total de 42 variedades liberadas mediante este método en un lapso de 16 años (1975-1991) El cultivo de anteras nos facilita el proceso, ya que las líneas así obtenidas son homozigolas, y los países colaboradores a los que se las enviamos pueden sembrarlas inmediatamente en ensayos preliminares de rendimiento, para evaluarlas y seleccionarlas bajo sus propias condiciones, de acuerdo con los problemas locales y de esta fonna acortar el tiempo requerido para desarrollar una variedad.Igualmente, en el trópico el cultivo de anteras abre nuevas perspectivas para la obtención más rápida de variedades para las condiciones de secano en suelos ácidos de sabana, donde la distribución de las lluvias sólo permite una cosecha anual.Nuestro programa ha desarrollado líneas DH que presentan el tipo de planta y calidad de grano de riego con raíces tipo secano asociadas con tolerancia a sequía, a partir de cruzamientos entre variedades de riego y secano (Cuadro 6, cr 9586-14-CA 7).Casi siempre el porcentaje de esterilidad es muy alto en cruzamientos amplios como lo son entre materiales índica y japónica, y del tipo riego y tipo secano. A través del cultivó de anteras ha sido posible obviar en parte este problema; por ejemplo, en CIA T se han obtenido DH fértiles a partir de cruzamientos estériles entre cultivares de riego y secano.Nuestro programa también viene utilizando el cultivo de anteras para acelerar la diversificación y ampliación de la base genética presente del germoplasma de arroz en América Latina, y para facilitar el rnapeo de genes de importancia como los de resistencia al virus de la hoja blanca, y resistencia a piricularia por RFLP Y RAPIDS.Cuadro 5. Variedades de arroz desarrolladas con cultivo de anteras. Muy poco se sabe de las implicaciones económicas del su uso del cultivo de anteras en el desarrollo de variedades. Información que es necesaria para facilitar la toma de decisiones para la incorporación del CA como una herramienta en mejoramiento.Un análisis econÓmico de costo y beneficio fue realizado por nuestro programa, donde se comparo el desarrollo de variedades mediante CA con el método pedigrí (MP), comúnmente utilizado en el mejoramiento de arroz (Marttnez et al., 1993). La respuesta al cultivo de anteras de 570 genotipos adaptados a diversos ecosistemas, y los costos fijos y variables asociados con la infraestructura y varios niveles de actividad para producir al menos una línea por CA que reuniera todas las características necesarias para su liberación como variedad. fueron utilizados como referencia. El análisis incluyo cinco niveles operacionales de laboratorio (5.500.50.000, 100.000, 150.000 Y 200.000 siembra de anteras/semana) para optimizar los ahorros. Los costos por el uso del cultivo de anteras fueron basados tomando como referencia nuestro laboratorio, el cual requirió una inversión inicial de US$60.000 (infraestructura, equipo y vidriería), con una capacidad de procesamiento de 150.000 anteras/semana con 5 técnicos y un asistente de investigaci6n, y opera con un presupuesto de US$ Il.OOO/semestre que incluye salarios del personal de apoyo, 20%del tiempo de un supervisor, reactivos, y costos de depreciaci6n. El desarrollo de las variedades Oryzica Llanos 4 y 5 en siete años para condiciones tropicales irrigadas fue utilizada como referencia para los costos del desarrollo de variedades por MP.Los estimados incluyeron los costos para la producci6n de plantas desde la Fl hasta la F6; ensayos de campo de rendimiento. regionales y comerciales; y salarios. Los cálculos resultaron en un total de US$ 204.000 por variedad por MP para condiciones irrigadas tropicales. Para condiciones irrigadas templadas (Jap6nica riego) y secano(1 cultivo/año, 12 años) los costos fueron incrementados en un 71 % con respecto a condiciones irrigadas tropicales (indica) (2 cultivos/año, 7 años), es decir, a un total de US$349.799 por variedad por MP.El estudio indicó que CA puede reducir los costos enlte US$S3.000 (indica X japónica secano) y $91.000 Gapónica riego) por variedad desarrollada, dependiendo del genotipo y ecosistema seleccionado. Estos costos representan ahorros hasta aproximadamente un 30% con respecto a MP (Cuadro 7). El nivel operacional óptimo para obtener el mayor ahorro. varió desde 50450 siembra de anteras/semana para Japónica riego a 150.000 siembra de anteras/semana para fndica X japÓnica secano. Con estos niveles operacionales. es posible en 3 meses y 7 1/2 meses sembrar el número de anteras requerido para desarrollar una variedad para condiciones irrigadas templadas Gapónica riego) y los otros ecosistemas.respectivamente. Este análisis sugiere que la implementación de CA es una alternativa atractiva para el desarrollo de variedades de arroz.Cuadro 7. Costos totales estimados para obtener una variedad con cultivo de anteras. Esta sección contiene el protocolo completo utilizado actualmente en nuestro laboratorio. desde la siembra de las anteras hasta la evaluación en el campo de las plantas regeneradas. Los protocolos aquí descritos estarán sujetos a las modificaciones necesarias de acuerdo a las investigaciones realizadas.La semilla de las plantas F¡ o F 2 se siembra en bandejas con suelo estéril o en eras o camas donde permanecen durante 20 a 25 días.Para esterilizar el suelo inicialmente se homogeniza y se le adicionan los correctivos físicos y químicos necesarios; posteriormente se coloca en un vagón esterilizador a vapor a una temperatura de 70 a Sefc por espacio de hora y media a dos.Luego se transplantan al campo a una distancia de siembra de 40 cm entre surcos y 30 cm entre plantas. Estas distancias permiten un buen desarrollo a las plantas y facilitan el desplazamiento dentro del cultivo para la selección y cosecha de las panículas (Figura 13). Este ntaterial recibe todas las prácticas normales de manejo del cultivo del arroz (Tascón y García, 1985).La selección de las panículas de donde se extraerán las anteras, se realiza a los 60 < 54 70 días (de acuerdo con el ciclo vegetativo del material genético) después del trasplante, en la etapa de embuchamiento. Esta se caracteriza por la diferenciación de las espiguillas en la inflorescencia y su crecimiento dentro de la vaina de la hoja bandera. De acuerdo con los objetivos propuestos se seleccionan las mejores plantas y de ellas se toman de 2 a 3 panículas, teniendo en cuenta su estado óptimo fitosanitario, o sea que está completamente sana. Las panículas se cosechan conservando el entrenudo y la vaina de la hoja, para protegerlas de contaminación con patógenos del campo. Para obtener una mayor respuesta, las panículas deben ser recolectadas preferiblemente en días soleados antes de las 10:00 a.m. Las panículas son colocadas en bolsas plásticas justo después de cosechadas para evitar su deshidratación. En el laboratorio, son limpiadas externamente con etanol al 70%, colocadas en una bolsa limpia, e incubadas a 8-lO o C por 7-8 días.Es aconsejable seleccionar aproximadamente 100 panículas por cada cruzamiento, teniendo en cuenta las siguientes características morfológicas. La distancia entre las aurículas de las dos últimas hojas debe estar en un rango de 4 a 8 cm (Figura 14), aunque puede variar según el genotipo de la planta y las condiciones ambientales en que se desarrolle la planta. Esta distancia esta asociada con un estado de desarrollo de las microsporas de uninucleado medio y/o tardío, óptimo para el cultivo de anteras. Este estado de desarrollo esta altamente correlacionado con flores de glumas amarillo verdosn y consistencia frágil. criterios que facilitan la selección en el momento de la siembra de las anteras.Para mayor precisión y cuando el tiempo lo permite, la observación microscópica de los granos de polen ayuda a determinar en cuál estado de desarrollo se encuentra el polen.Las panículas previamente tratadas a 8-100C por 7-8 días, se sacan de la vaina de la hoja y se toman de la base, sosteniéndolas en forma invertida para cortar con tijera el primer tercio que se desecha, y aprovechar solo el tercio medio, evitando así el contacto de la mano con esta parte de la inflorescencia (Figura 15). Luego se sumergen en etanol al 70% durante l minuto.Posteriormente. se sumergen las espiguillas durante 3 minutos en un recipiente estéril. que contiene una solución de hipoclorito de sodio al 10% (lO mi clorox comercial con 5.25% NaOCI de compuesto activo en 90 mI HzO) con Tween 80 como agente dispersante (3 gotas/lOO mI de solución). y acidificada con 5 gotas de HCl 1 N por cada 100 mi de solución. para aumentar la efectividad del hipoclorito.Luego se lavan 4 a 5 veces en agua destilada estériL Las panículas desinfestadas se colocan en una caja de petri estéril con papel filtro humedecido en agua estériL Esta operación debe realizarse en un lugar limpio. sin corrientes de aire o polvo y preferiblemente en un gabinete de flujo laminar de aire estéril.Es aconsejable determinar el estado de desarrollo en que se encuentra el polen al iniciar un proyecto de cultivo de anteras. y sobre todo. cuando aún no se ha adquirido la práctica suficiente en la selección de las panículas en el campo. Esto facilita precisar las características morfológicas indicadoras del estado óptimo para el cultivo de anteras de cada genotipo en estudio, las cuales pueden variar según la . condición ambiental donde se desarrollen las plantas donantes de las anteras. Este análisis citológico se realiza mediante la siguiente técnica:Se fijan las anteras sumergiendo las flores durante 24 horas a temperatura ambiente en 3 partes de etanol absoluto y una parte de ácido acético glacial, al cual se le agrega cloruro férrico al 0.5%. Cuando se necesita hacer una determinación rápida, las flores se pueden colocar en la solución fijadora en baño de María a 70°C por 45 minutos.produciéndose alrededor de 980 a 2800 callos. De estos callos se regeneran alrededor de 70 a 334 plantas RI' dependiendo de la respuesta del genotipo a la técnica.En esta fase. los microcallos se transfieren a frascos más grandes (de 10)[ 10 cm), los cuales contienen un medio de cultivo que promueve la regeneración de plántulas (medio de regeneración). La transferencia de los callos se realiza vaciando un poco el medio liquido de inducción que contiene los microcallos, y utilizando una espátula o bisturf para su manipulación.Asumiendo que cada microcallo ha sido originado por un grano de polen inmaduro, es conveniente mantenerlos separados aproximadamente 0,5 cm. Para lograrlo, la transferencia se hace en fonna individual o en grupo para después separarlos dentro del medio. Esta última alternativa es más eficiente cuando el volumen de material es grande. Para garantizar un alta diferenciación de plantas. es aconsejable cultivar un máximo de 10-15 callos por frasco por 150 mi medio.Durante la incubación los frascos deben mantenerse a una temperatura de 24 a 26°C.Inicialmente son colocados en una estantería con luz indirecta por una semana. Luego son llevados a luz directa con una iluminación de 80 a lOO fl E. m-2 .s• 1 que se logra con lámparas fluorescentes tipo luz día con alto porcentaje de color azul, y expuestas a un fotoperíodo de 16 horas (Figura 20).5.8 Adaptación de las plántulas para el trasplante a suelo A los 30-40 días. cuando las plantas han alcanzado suticiente desarrollo foliar y radicular (Figura 21), se retiran manualmente del frasco para después lavar con agua sus raíces con el fin de eliminar los residuos de callos y medio. cortar a la mitad la lámina foliar y sumergir sus raíces en agua por I ó 2 días, operación que se realiza en el laboratorio.Luego se llevan las plantas al invernadero donde se transplantan en bandejas con suelo estéril y fangueado o sobresaturado, y permanecen a una temperatura de 28 a 30°C y protegidas del sol directo para evitar su deshidratación (Figura 22). Después de 8 dfas se fenilizan las plantas con una mezcla que contiene 30% de N, 7% de P 205 Y 6% de K, aplicando 4 gramos de fertilizante NPK por litro de agua, y posteriormente se pasan a una casa de malla en las mismas bandejas.A las dos semanas las plantas son transplantadas al campo donde reciben el manejo apropiado al cultivo de arroz (Figura 23). Cada planta regenerada Rt es potencialmente un genotipo diferente y se maneja con ese criterio.5.9 Evaluación de las plantas R I , lineas R 2 y selección de la semilla RJ La evaluación de las plantas RI se realiza de acuerdo con los objetivos del programa de mejoramiento. Al realizar la selección de las plantas regeneradas (R I ), se debe tener en cuenta que éstas han pasado por diferentes estreses en su desarrollo y debido a ésto es posible que ciertas caracterfsticas fenotípicas tales como altura, floración, macollamiento, fertilidad, y centro blanco, pueden verse afectadas y no expresarse en forma normal. Por consiguiente los datos que se lomen en las plantas regeneradas RI deben interpretarse con cuidado.La semilla de las plantas R I se siembra para pruebas de uniformidad obteniéndose la generación R 2 (Figura 24). Su semilla, denominada RJ se siembra de nuevo obteniéndose la generación RJ. En cada generación el material se evalúa y selecciona de acuerdo con los objetivos del programa de mejoramiento.Figura 13. Cultivo de arroz en el momento de la selección de las panículas.Figura 15. Corte del tercio medio de la panícula.Figura 17. Siembra de las anteras en el medio de cultivo para la inducción del microcaJlo. La preparación y el almacenamiento de los medios de cultivos son críticos para garantizar una respuesta exitosa, ya que de ello depende la composición química del medio y la disponibilidad de los nutrientes al tejido vegetal cultivado in vi/ro. La composición del medio es afectada por el manejo y almacenamiento de los reactivos, así como por la preparación y almacenamiento de las soluciones madres. A continuación se describen algunas consideraciones a ser tomadas en esta etapa.Algunas sales (macronutrientes y micronutrienles) de los medios de cultivo usados comúnmente en cultivo in vi/ro pueden ser obtenidas comercialmente en forma de premezcla. Las premezclas son útiles sobre todo en aquellos laboratorios donde se cultiva a gran escala y hay limitaciones de personal. Tienen además la ventaja de garantizar calidad y resultados reproducibles. Sin embargo, las premezclas presentan la desventaja que son mas costosas que la preparación del medio con sales individuales. También en la investigación frecuentemente se necesita preparar. medios experimentales con modificaciones en la composición y la cantidad de los constituyentes, lo que limita el uso de las premezclas. En el caso de utilizar sales individuales para la preparación del m<:dio, es aconsejable preparar inicialmente soluciones concentradas de los ingredientes (soluciones madres), ya que los niveles de la mayoría de las sales involucradas en el medio son relativamente pequeños.El agua utilizada tanto para la preparación de las soluciones madres como para el medio debe ser de alta pureza y libre de iones, es decir, agua destilada y deionizada.Las soluciones madres de sales inorgánicas son fácilmente formuladas por la disolución de cantidades prescritas de sus cristales en agua. Algunas sustancias orgánicas, tales como las auxinas, citoquininas y giberilinas, son difíciles de disolver en agua. Las citoquininas, al igual que otros compuestos básicos, se disuelven fácilmente en pequeñas cantidades de un ácido diluido (ej., HCI 1 N). Por el contrario, las auxinas, giberilinas y otros ingredientes acidos se disuelven en bases diluidas (ej •• KOH IN). La proporción de 0.3 mi del ácido o base por 10 mg de citoquininas o auxinas puede ser usada como guía general. Frecuentemente es necesaria una agitación vigorosa con una barra agitadora para lograr una completa disolución. La muestra predisuelta es luego llevada a un volumen final con agua. Las soluciones madres deben ser almacenadas sin ajustar pH, para así disminuir la precipitación. Los ajustes de pH son hechos después de la inclusión de todas las soluciones madres en el medio fmal.Los co-solventes orgánicos, tales como la acetona y el alcohol pueden ser necesarios para disolver ciertas sustancias orgánicas neulfales. Estos co-solventes son relativamente fitotóxicos. Por 10 tanto, sólo pueden ser usadas cantidades pequellas.La disolución f!flal con agua de las soluciones madres preparadas con co-solventes orgánicos debe ser hecha ~ápidamente para evitar la precipitación.La refrigeración es recomendada en el almacenamiento de soluciones madres de muchos qufmicos orgánicos. Algunos compuestos, como las giberilinas, el ácido ascórbicoy ciertas auxinas (ej. el ácido indolacético, AIA), son extremadamente inestables y sus soluciones madres pueden ser preparadas frescas. Las soluciones de algunos qufmicos, tales como las sales de hierro deben ser protegidas de la luz, almacenáÍldolas en frascos oscuros o ambar. Las solucioIies madres de la mayoría de las sales inorgánicas no requieren refrigeración. Antes de utilizar una solución madre, es aconsejable verificar que esté libre de precipitación y contaminación.Como norma general, es aconsejable familiarizarse con la forma de disolución y el almacenamiento de los reactivos antes de preparar las soluciones madres, para así garantizar una adecuada composición de la solución. Esta información puede ser suministrada conjuntamente con el producto por el proveedor comercial y obtenida en catálogos de caracterización química de compuestos (ej., Merck). Las premezclas y los reactivos puros deben ser almacenados preferiblemente en lugares con baja humedad relativa y temperaturas por debajo de 28 Q C. La baja humedad relativa es más crítica que la refrigeración. En el Cuadro 8 se resume las condiciones óptimas recomendadas para el almacenamiento de los reactivos utilizados en los protocolos descritos en este manuaL 6,2 Medidas de seguridad en el manejo de reactivos Si bien el tipo de reactivos utilizados en cultivo de tejidos y células vegetales son por lo general inocuos, hay algunos que deben ser manejados siguiendo ciertas precauciones para evitar un posible dalIo a la salud del operante y otras personas del laboratorio. Como norma general, es aconsejable antes de utilizar por primera vez un reactivo, familiarizarse con las especificaciones recomendadas por el fabricante sobre el manejo del mismo. En el Cuadro 9 se detallan los reactivos que son utilizados comúnmente en el cultivo de anteras de arroz y que deben ser manejados con cierta precauci6n.6.3 Formulaci6n de los medios basales utilizados para la inducci6n de callos y regeneraci6n de plantas Para la etapa de inducci6n de callos se están utilizando en general dos tipos de medios básicos denominados N6m y NL (Cuadro 2). Estos medios nan sido formulados obteniéndose un incremento significativo en la producción de callos de genotipos jap6nica e índica, respectivamente. Para la regeneraci6n de plantas se utilizan el medio MS (Cuadro 2) y 1/2 MS para callos inducidos en N6m y NL, respectivamente.6.4 Preparación de un litro de los medios N6m y NL para la inducci6n de callos.En los Cuadros 10 Y 1\\ se detallan los componentes de los medios N6m y NL, Y la cantidad a tomar de cada solución madre para preparar un litro de medio de cultivo.Como se indica en los cuadros, varias sustancias se combinan para reducir el número de soluciones madres; las sustancias inestables se preparan solas y los reactivos que puedan precipitarse no se mezclan. En las soluciones se utiliza siempre agua destilada-deionizada.La soluci6n fuente de hierro se prepara disolviendo por separado el N~EDTA y el FeS047H20 en 1/4 del volumen final de solución. Al disolver el NazEDTA se debe calentar un poco en baño de María. Posterionnente se mezclan los dos volúmenes, se agíta bien y se deja enfriar, para luego completar con agua el volumen final. La solución debe envasarse en un frasco oscum y almacenarse a temperamra ambiente.Si la tiarnina-HCl no se disuelve bien, debe calentarse ligeramente. Esta solución se puede guardar uno o dos meses.La solución 2,4-D se prepara adicionando 50 mg del compuesto a 5 mI de 50% etanol calentado levemente a bailo de María. Luego se ajusta el volumen final a 100 mI con agua previamente calentada a la misma temperatura.La solución de piclorarno se prepara adicionando 7 mg del compuesto en 5 mI de etanol 70%, se calienta suavemente, y se ajusta el volumen a 100 mI.La solución de kinetina se prepara disolviendo los 100 mg del compuesto en aproximadamente 5 mI de 0.5 N HCl. Se calienta a baja temperatura hasta disolver.Se ajusta el volumen a 100 mI. Se divide en alícuotas para almacenar en el congelador a -rJ>C. Descongelar cada alicuota en bailo de María antes de usar, y almacenar el remanente a 4°C (refrigerador) por un máximo de 1 mes.Para preparar un Iitm del medio N6m proceda de la siguiente manera:Adicione 500 mI de agua destilada-deionizada.Adicione las cantidades de las soluciones madres indicadas en el Cuadro 10, siguiendo el mismo orden y con agitación continua.Adicione 50 g de suerosa.Lleve el volumen a un litm.Ajuste el pH a 5.8.Envase en cada frasco de inducción (7 cm X 4 cm, frasco de compota para bebe) 10 mi de medio.Esterilice los frascos en un autoclave a 122°C de temperatura y 20 psi de presión, durante 15 minutos.Déjelos enfriar y almacénelos a una temperatura de 8-lO o C. El medio puede pennanecer en el cuarto frío hasta dos meses en estas condiciones.y Skoog, lo cual ahOITa mucho tiempo. Sin embargo, la preparación de la solución madre, aunque demanda tiempo y cuidado permite además la posibilidad de realizar cambios cualitativos y cuantitativos en los constituyentes del medio de acuerdo con la necesidad. En el Cuadro 12 se detallan las sustancias que componen el medio MS.Las indicaciones para la preparación de las soluciones madres son iguales a las dadas para el medio de inducción.La solución No. 6 puede mantenerse hasta dos meses mientras que las otras duran hasta 5 meses. Las soluciones No. 2 y No. 6 se deben mantener en el congelador hasta donde sea posible; las demás se guardan refrigeradas.La solución de ácido naftalenacético (ANA) se prepara disolviendo 200 mg del compuesto en aproximadamente 5 mI de 0.5 N KOH. Se calienta a temperatura baja hasta disolver. Se completa el volumen final a 200 mI con agua. Es aconsejable preparar esta solución semanalmente.En la preparación de los medios de cultivo se deben tener en cuenta las siguientes precauciones:Asegúrese siempre de llevar un buen control de las soluciones madres para evitar excesos o faltantes.No olvide ajustar el pH de los medios de cultivo a 5.8.Revise el buen estado de las soluciones, es decir que no presenten precipitaciones o contaminaciones y asegúrese de que estén debidamente marcadas.Antes de empezar a preparar cualquiera de los medios tenga todas las sustancias necesarias a mano, ésto le ahorrará tiempo, trabajo y evitará errores.Evite los riesgos de contaminación de las soluciones y del equipo empleado.Cuadro 8. Condiciones óptimas para el almacenamiento de reactivos. Solución madre para preparar un litIO de medio NL para inducción de callos de genotipos indica.-----------Componentes Cantidad Volumen de \"20 VolUmen de solución (mg) Solución madre para preparar un litro de medio MS para regeneración de plantas a partir de callos inducidos en medio N6m.Componentes Cantidad (mg)Volumen de H10 Volumen de solución * Se puede usar 'üúCar del mercado, cristalizíilÜ:''''~ ! ..:. '\" '¡ ., .¡"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3523780535.json b/main/part_2/3523780535.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a90cce195d7b197a1512d08ad5c44280fcbad76 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3523780535.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0717e78d7d3f73d6cb07bafea5dac181","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8b6f77e3-fabc-4013-b97d-55eee0452d9c/retrieve","id":"-146504239"},"keywords":["Ira Mint-unsplash Photo: (Top Left) V. Meadu (CCAFS)","(Top Right) USAID","(Bottom Left) USAID Siegfried Modola","(Bottom Right) USAID/Siegfried Modola Dean Chahim IPSL-CM5A-LR RCP8.5 CanESM2 RCP8.5 RCP8.5/ 4.5 RCP4.5 NOAA-GFDL-ESM2M RCP8.5/ 4.5 NorESM1-M RCP8.5/ 4.5"],"sieverID":"b8b8020b-26ac-46ca-8b34-e4d8d71d5b88","content":"In these highly uncertain and rapidly changing times, the SADC region, like many regions in Africa, remains fundamentally dependent on a resilient agricultural system and natural resource base. Climate change still poses the greatest threat to the agricultural system and therefore technical capacity is needed to address these future impacts and adapt plans, policies and programs. Taking into account alternative futures, the SADC Futures project has produced tailored supporting materials and documents as part of a wider approach for foresight training in the region. These documents and the associated foresight framework aim to equip users to practically apply the range of foresight tools and methods for innovative strategic planning and policy formulation for climate resilience.Why is it happening?What will we do differently?Figure 1. IPCC climate risk framework (IPCC 2014).10 Table 1. Available GCM/RCM combinations for CORDEX-Africa RCP8.5 and RCP4.5.Table 2. Vulnerability indicators identified and used in the analysis (adapted from Thornton et al. 2008). RCP4.5 (2031RCP4.5 ( -2059)), as compared to the historical time period . Multi-model ensemble mean of change in 95th percentile of rainfall (R95) by mid-century in RCP4.5 (2031RCP4.5 ( -2059)), as compared to the historical time period .23 Figure 8. Multi-model ensemble mean of change in 95th percentile of rainfall (R95) by mid-century in RCP8.5 (2031RCP8.5 ( -2059)), as compared to the historical time period . The assessment uses regional climate models from CORDEX-Africa to map rainfall extremes and drought hazards to 2031-2059. Ten social and biophysical vulnerability indicators are identified from across the capital assets (human, physical, social, financial, natural), using data from the Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), to develop a vulnerability index. The vulnerability index and distribution of climate hazards are mapped to identify hotspots.Hotspots of vulnerability to and risk of extreme rainfall are shown in northern Madagascar and in south west Tanzania, under both the RCP4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. Hotspots for drought under these scenarios are shown in Tanzania. However, it is clear that medium-high climate risk (high vulnerability, medium-high climate hazard) is widespread across Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Tanzania, Mozambique, and Madagascar.Photo: Kon Karampelas-unsplashSeven Key Recommendations 1.3.7.Hotspots of vulnerability to and risk of extreme rainfall and drought occur in northern Madagascar and south west Tanzania, under both medium and high greenhouse gas emission scenarios.Areas of high vulnerability coupled with medium-high climate hazard are widespread across Angola, DRC, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar.There is a mismatch between locations with the highest future climate risk and where on-the-ground research on climate change impacts and adaptation is currently being undertaken, with potentially serious consequences for testing and implementation of appropriate and robust adaptation options.Population growth in these areas is projected to remain high to mid-century -robust targeting and implementation of on-theground research for development is needed, based on national policy objectives.National policy objectives are required that identify robust and climate resilient pathways for agricultural and economic development to prevent sub-optimal or maladaptive choices now, such as replacing crops like rice with maize in response to current climate change, which is likely to be unproductive under future climate conditions.There is a role and need for participatory processes that bring together food system actors in high-risk locations to identify needs and design and implement responses that are tailored to the specific contexts of those locations, there is not a \"one size fits all\" that will work in all contexts within a country.This report presents a rapid climate risk assessment for the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region. The goal is to identify climate risk hotspots -locations where climate hazards, exposure and vulnerability coincide to increase the risks of adverse impacts. The 2014 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) risk framework is used to structure this analysis (Figure 1) (IPCC 2014).In this framework, natural variability and anthropogenic (human induced) climate change create climate hazards, which are geographically distributed.A climate hazard is defined as:\"The potential occurrence of a natural or human-induced physical event that may cause loss of life, injury, or other health impacts, as well as damage and loss to property, infrastructure, livelihoods, service provision, and environmental resources\" (IPCC 2012). Socio-economic processes (e.g., economic activities, livelihoods, decision-making) determine whether communities or economies are exposed to climate hazards and whether they are vulnerable.Exposure is defined as:\"The presence of people; livelihoods; environmental services and resources; infrastructure; or economic, social, or cultural assets in places that could be adversely affected\" (IPCC 2012).Vulnerability is defined as:\"The propensity or predisposition to be adversely affected\" (IPCC 2012).Is where hazards, exposure and vulnerability intersect and interact, so that risk is not just about the natural hazard but also about the socio-ecological system where that hazard occurs. For example, the activity of an economy might lead to emissions that drive climate change, which in turn might increase the severity and occurrence of flooding. But an economic system that encourages building houses on higher ground, implements a variety of flood defence and mitigation measures, and invests in economic activities that are not impacted by flooding, can both reduce exposure to the climate hazard, and vulnerability of the economy and communities to flooding hazards, and hence have a lower climate risk. However, a different economy exposed to the same severity and intensity of hazard might face very different climate risks, because of differences in exposure and vulnerability.Photo: Curioso Photography-unsplashEcological-economic models (Fischer et al. 2005) Climate risk mapping has been widely used to understand the distribution of and interaction between climate and other stressors. Different studies use different approaches, models and indicators to understand current and future risks. For example, Fischer et al. (2005) used ecological-economic models that linked crops, climate and trade to estimate future impacts on crop production in Africa.They found that net cereal production potential will fall but with large variations between countries. Similarly, the yield response models produced by Schlenker and Lobell (2010) use crop and weather data alongside farmer responses (i.e. adaptations) to look at the impacts on four different crops (sorghum, millet, maize, groundnuts) across Africa. They found that the impacts on yields of these important and staple food crops are likely to be mostly negative. Data availability is also a critical limitation for studies of this type. Data for some countries was either not available or only available at a country level. Where this has been the case the data has been sourced from an alternative database (where possible) and some data has been downscaled to county/district level by assigning each county/ district the same value, making the assumption that the country data is representative of every county/district. As a result, these indicators will not differentiate between counties/districts.Uncertainty is an inherent feature of these studies. What is presented here is not a projection of the future, but presentation of possible futures, and it is unlikely to have identified all possible hotspots in the region. (Sonwa et al. 2017).Here the focus is on droughts and extreme rainfall, as between 1970 and 2020 these were the most common types of climate hazards in Africa (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters 2020).The region is highly sensitive to droughts due to a dependence on rainfed agriculture (Adejuwon and Olaniyan 2019). Droughts adversely affect water supplies, crop and livestock production and cause food insecurity and conflicts among competing water users (Oguntunde et al. 2017;Adejuwon and Olaniyan 2019). Some crops show more climate resilience than others, but the majority of projected impacts of climate change on rainfed agriculture are negative (Serdeczny et al. 2017). As well as being adversely affected by droughts, much of the SADC region is also negatively impacted by extreme rainfall (Tarhule 2005). Extreme rainfall can lead to landslides and soil erosion, and to floods that can cause direct injury and death to people and livestock, as well as damage infrastructure and fields (Chamani et al. 2018;Tarhule 2005;Tschakert et al. 2010;Sonwa et al. 2017). Extreme rainfall is a necessary but not sufficient condition for damaging floods; land use patterns, drainage and waste management infrastructure are also important, however, with increasing rainfall intensity flood risk increases (Tazen et al. 2019).Climate change may exacerbate both of these hazards. Previous work has found that the occurrence and severity of droughts in Africa are likely to worsen with climate change due to increases in temperature and changes in rainfall (Adejuwon and Olaniyan 2019;Oguntunde et al. 2017;Gan et al. 2016). There is large uncertainty in the sign and magnitude of climate change impacts on mean rainfall for the region (Rowell and Chadwick 2018), however, extreme rainfall is expected to increase over large parts of the region (Kendon et al. 2019;Sonkoué et al. 2018;Amoussou et al. 2020), and so the associated risk of floods (Tazen et al. 2019).Previous analyses of climate hazards over Africa have focussed primarily on the CMIP5 ensemble of global climate models. Here we make use of the CORDEX-Africa ensemble of regional climate models, which improve on the representation of climate over global climate models, particularly when it comes to extreme events and precipitation (Paeth and Mannig 2013;Gibba et al. 2018;Diallo et al. 2015). In comparison with other extreme weather events, storms (including tropical cyclones) result in the most human displacement. For example, in the SADC region approximately 1.7 million people were left homeless between 1980 and 2016 due to storms (Davis-Reddy and Vincent 2017). The associated flooding disproportionately affects communities with poor infrastructure and health services, often resulting in a loss of life, injury, damage to property and infrastructure as well as the spread of disease e.g. malaria and cholera.Madagascar was affected by five cyclones during the 1993-1994 season. In 1994, Cyclone Geralda (category 5) destroyed more than 90% of the port city of Toamasina. The damage was estimated at USD 10 million (Davis-Reddy and Vincent 2017).In 2000, Cyclone Eline caused severe flooding in Mozambique and to a lesser extent in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Botswana.High winds, torrential rains and high river flows resulted in economic losses and damage to infrastructure, livelihoods, and agricultural crops. In Mozambique alone, around 700 people lost their lives and the GDP growth rate dropped from 10% to 2% (Davis-Reddy and Vincent 2017).In 2004, Cyclone Gafilo (category 5) hit Madagascar. It was the most intense tropical cyclone worldwide in 2004. It was estimated that approximately 773,000 people were affected, and it cost USD 250 million in damages (ReliefWeb 2004).In 2019, Cyclone Idai hit Beira in Mozambique and then continued moving across the region. Millions of people were affected in Malawi, Mozambique, and Zimbabwe. Cyclone Idai was the worst natural disaster to hit Southern Africa in around two decades.Six weeks later, Cyclone Kenneth made landfall in northern Mozambique. This was the first occurrence of two strong tropical cyclones hitting the country in the same season. The cyclones caused severe flooding, destroying infrastructure and more than 800,000 hectares of crop land over the three SADC member states (SADC 2019). Approximately, 3.3 million people were affected by the cyclones, requiring immediate humanitarian assistance, including food, shelter, clothing, potable water, sanitation, and medical support. The affected population also faced epidemic threats of cholera, other diarrheal infections, and malaria (UNICEF 2019).In the second stage we characterised underlying social and biophysical vulnerability across the SADC region. Following the methodological approach of Thornton et al. (2008) We used the regional climate models available from CORDEX-Africa to analyse climate hazards in the SADC region. The CORDEX-Africa models are available at a 0.44° x 0.44° resolution. The multi-model ensemble for RCP8.5 includes 6 RCMs (regional climate models) with 11 different GCMs (global climate models) providing initial and boundary driving conditions, and for RCP4.5 7 RCMs and 9 different GCMs. The matrix of GCM/RCM combinations is presented in Table 1. We used 1971-1999 as the historical period, 2031-2059 as the mid-century period.We examined the impact of extreme rainfall by looking at the 95th percentile of daily rainfall (R95 index), and drought by looking at the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI), as defined by Vicente-Serrano et al. ( 2010), which is a commonly used drought index that performs well compared to alternatives (Labudová et al. 2017) and has been used in Africa (e.g. Abiodun et al. 2018;Adejuwon and Olaniyan 2019;Ghebrezgabher et al. 2016;Oguntunde et al. 2017;Polong et al. 2019;Ujeneza and Abiodun 2015). We used 1955-1970 as the reference period, and looked at droughts over 1 month in duration and used the log-logistic distribution. We performed the calculation using the 'SPEI' package for R statistical software (Begueria and Serrano 2017;R Core Team 2013). Using SPEI, a value of -1 is classified as a drought, and -2 and below is classified as a severe drought. Table 1. Available GCM/RCM combinations for CORDEX-Africa RCP8.5 and RCP4.5.A total of 10 indicators were chosen based on data availability and where possible, we identified and used the most recent data sources (Table 2). Below, we give a summary of each indicator and briefly discuss their hypothesised relationships with vulnerability to climate hazards. (Carney 1998) Human capitalThe health poverty headcount indicator represents the percentage of the population considered poor. It measures deprivation of health standards within a given household where a household is considered poor if: a) any adult (under 70 years old) or child within the household is considered undernourished, and b) any child (under 18 years) has died in the five years preceding the survey. The potential impacts from climate change on human health are complex and largely adverse, for example, exacerbating challenges with food and nutrition security (Wolski et al. 2020), manifesting through new distributions in disease vectors (Caminade et al. 2014;Moore et al. 2017) and aggravating underlying health problems (Kapwata et al. 2018).Higher poverty headcounts for health are therefore associated with higher levels of vulnerability.The (Lutz et al. 2014). We therefore assume that higher poverty headcounts for education are associated with higher levels of vulnerability.The standard of living indicator measures deprivation of living standards by combining six indicators. A household is considered poor if:The household cooks with un-improved fuel, e.g. dung, wood, charcoal or coal;Either their sanitation facility is not improved, in accordance with sustainable development goal (SDG) guidelines, or their sanitation facilities are improved but are shared with other households;Either the household has no access to improved drinking water, in line with SDG guidelines, or the distance to safe drinking water exceeds a 30-minute round-trip;The household has no electricity;One or more of the three housing materials (for roof, walls and floor) are made of either rudimentary or natural materials and are therefore considered inadequate; andHousehold members do not own more than one listed asset (radio, TV, telephone, computer, animal cart, bicycle, motorbike, refrigerator), or a motorised vehicle.A good standard of living is a prerequisite for human development and wellbeing (Rao and Min 2018). Sturdy infrastructure protects against inclement weather, access to potable water and safe sanitation protects against water-borne diseases, and the use of improved energy sources reduces health burdens (e.g. linked to indoor air pollution), especially for women and children. Thus, a lower standard of living equates to higher levels of underlying vulnerability.For countries lacking MPI data (i.e. Botswana, Mauritius and the Seychelles), a related measure of poverty was sought. This resulted in the combined use of World Bank indicators for percentage of people/homes living on less than USD 1.90, with access to clean cooking fuels, access to basic sanitation and drinking water, and access to electricity (N.B. rationale for the inclusion of these data is provided within the Section on Creating risk maps Page 19).The access to market indicator measures travel time to the nearest urban area in excess of 20,000 people. Markets are important for reducing vulnerability as they stimulate livelihood and income diversification, particularly into off-farm sectors (Haggblade et al. 2010). Households nearer markets also tend to have better access to services (e.g. education, health and extension). We therefore assume that better market access is associated with reduced vulnerability. The gender inequality indicator measures disparities between men and women in three areas of development:Reproductive health, Empowerment, and Economic status.Reproductive health quantifies maternal mortality ratios and adolescent birth rate. Empowerment encompasses both the proportion of parliamentary seats occupied by women, and the percentage women and men (above the age of 25) with secondary education. Economic status measures the labour force participation rates of men and women over the age of 15. The majority of the world's poor are women 1 and women typically experience the most severe impacts from climate change in situations of poverty. For example, in the aftermath of a disaster, women are more likely than men to be displaced and be victims of violence (Cutter 2017). Women have less access to, and control over, resources, which undermines their ability to cope with and adapt to climate impacts. Subsequently, women also have fewer capabilities than men, limiting their contributions to decision-making processes (World Bank 2009). Higher gender inequality therefore represents higher levels of vulnerability.The governance indicator uses data from the World Bank, based on a study by Kaufmann et al. (2005). Following (Thornton et al. 2008), we use two of the six dimensions:Voice and accountabilityBecause all six indicators cannot be meaningfully combined for a given country. Scores for the two indicators were normalised into quintiles at national level. Good governance creates enabling environments for investment, job creation and effective implementation of regulations, such as those related to climate adaptation, and is associated with higher adaptive capacity at the national level (Brooks et al. 2005). We therefore assume that better governance equates to lower levels of vulnerability.Per capita GDP provides a measure for estimating the economic prosperity of a country, where income is associated with access to resources. Whilst economic indicators such as GDP have been found to be poor indicators of mortality as a result of climate-related disasters (Brooks et al. 2005), losses in GDP have been used to measure national vulnerability to climate impacts (Formetta and Feyen 2019), and per capita GDP has also been used as a measure for economic security (Li et al. 2019). We assume that higher per capita GDP is associated with lower levels of vulnerability, although we note that this also assumes that resources are distributed equally amongst the population.The agricultural sector is highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change (Mase et al. 2017), particularly in rainfed systems across much of the SADC region (Cooper et al. 2008). National economies more dependent on agriculture are therefore more susceptible to climate impacts and expected changes. Countries with higher economic dependency on agriculture may also be less diverse (Thornton et al. 2008). Higher contributions of agricultural GDP to total GDP is therefore assumed to be associated with higher vulnerability.The crop production suitability indicator considers the known and calculated rainfed pasture and crop requirements, the dominant soil conditions of a given area, and soil management practices used, under intermediate input scenarios, as stipulated by FAO (2007). Whilst rainfed agriculture is highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change, areas with higher crop suitability provide greater diversification options for rural populations (e.g. growing different, or a range of crops), offering opportunities for risk spreading, thus increasing resilience (Lin 2011;Speranza et al. 2014). We thus assume that higher cropping suitability is associated with lower vulnerability.The soil erosion indicator assesses human-induced soil erosion resulting from land use/land cover change. The modelled data do not include short-term impacts from land use (e.g. fire and wood harvesting), overgrazing and climate change effects. Soil erosion rates are divided into seven classes (ranging from 0-350 t/25km cell sample), according to the European Soil Bureau classifications. Soil degradation, which can be exacerbated by climate change and extreme events, undermines agricultural productivity and reduces water quality (FAO 2015). Extreme rainfall events and flooding can also trigger landslides. Areas with higher levels of soil erosion are therefore considered to be more vulnerable. c.Photo: Dimitry-unsplashTo further visualise and understand the vulnerability of each nation, indicator values were normalised to make them comparable before combining them into an index of average vulnerability. To achieve this, the separate map layers for each vulnerability indicator were combined into a single database and exported to Excel. Within Excel the quartile range for each indicator was determined and values were reassigned to a quartile depending on whether they fell within the 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th quartile of all values.The assignment of values, whether to the 1st or 4th quartile, was based on whether a high figure for a given indicator was deemed to be good or bad, and vice versa (e.g. for Soil Loss, high loss was deemed to be bad and was consequently assigned a value of 1, i.e. the 1st quartile; conversely high GDP was deemed to be good if falling within the upper 25% of values and assigned a value of 4, i.e. the 4th quartile). Following data processing each indicator quartile, within each nation, was summed and divided by the number of total indicators for each country to provide an average (mean) level of vulnerability on a continuous scale of 1.0-4.0 (representing each quartile), with 1.0 being highly vulnerable and 4.0 being less vulnerable.To visualise the range of vulnerability indicators across the SADC region and to assist eventual identification of hotspots, all data were mapped using a Geographic Information System (GIS).Initially, all data were imported into the GIS (ArcGIS 10.6) either in its raw tabulated form (e.g. for the MPI data) or, where available, in its original GIS format (e.g. the Distance to Market and Soil Erosion data are provided as raster map layers by data authors).To present data in the regional context, national boundaries for each of the member nations of the SADC and the respective first and second level district boundaries were also imported into the mapping environment. Using the Join -Relate function of the GIS, data for the Human, Physical, Financial and Social capital indicators was assigned to their respective national boundary. This duly produced a suite of ten maps for each vulnerability indicator at a national scale (not shown here).The data gap for Botswana was filled using alternative data (section on Vulnerability indicators Page 16) before calculating the combined average vulnerability for each county. Representative World Bank indicators for physical capital were identified and used to represent 'Living Standards' within Botswana, as well as Mauritius and the Seychelles (albeit fewer comparable indicators were found for the latter two countries).Though similar, it is acknowledged that the World Bank data is not a direct replacement for the MPI measures of standard of living. However, inclusion was deemed preferable to exclusion of countries without MPI data.The normalised indicator data for each country, and the combined average indicator value for each country, were imported back into the GIS as a data table and, using the Join -Relate function, reassigned to the boundary map of each SADC country. This facilitated the production of a choropleth (or 'thematic') map showing the vulnerability index for each country across SADC allowing direct comparisons to be made across the region (Section on Vulnerability maps Page 24), though not with other countries and regions.To achieve greater resolution and accuracy within the vulnerability maps, the data allocation and normalisation exercise was repeated for each country's first and second level districts. For the tabulated data, this involved reassigning national values to districts (district level data was not available for several countries and/or there were significant inconsistencies in names of districts). For the raster and vector vulnerability data (i.e. Crop Suitability, Soil Loss and Distance to Market), however, this involved converting the map layers to data points and assigning them individually to each district using the Join -Relate function (where multiple points existed within a geographic area, the mean of values was assigned to the district). Though this procedure effectively adds weighting to these latter indicators, it provides the combined vulnerability maps with greater nuance in terms of identifying potential 'hotspots' and lessens the impact of data for key indicators, such as roads to markets, being effectively lost in a large country's national data (e.g. within the DRC) and Angola where there are fewer good quality roads to markets in the interior).Simple raster layers were produced for each climate rainfall and drought scenario (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) and overlaid onto the vulnerability map. Bivariate maps were also produced where the climate data raster layers were converted to data points and normalised in the manner described above for raster vulnerability data. The point data for climate risks was then assigned to the relevant districts (and averaged where multiple points fell within one district). As such, it should be noted that to produce the discrete figures required to produce a bivariate map (i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4 rather than 1.0-4.0) both the average climate risk and vulnerability data was rounded up or down to its nearest significant figure. This serves to heighten the severity, good or bad, of indicators, which should be noted in respect to interpretation of the maps, but also brings greater resolution and emphasise to potential hotspots of risk (relative to the wider SADC). A systematic literature review was undertaken to compile evidence about regional SADC climate risks, adaptation and vulnerability. Systematic reviews seek to synthesise existing knowledge about a topic through a review of the literature focussed on specific research questions. The approach increases methodological transparency and rigour in the process of synthesising research by requiring that methods used are explicitly outlined and reproducible, and that document selection and review meets pre-defined and defensible eligibility criteria (Cooper et al. 2019;Fink 2020). A number of methodological guidelines exist (Pullin and Stewart 2006;Moher et al. 2009;Berrang-Ford et al. 2015), often tailored to particular disciplinary perspectives.Systematic reviews require similar specific components to be reported and generally include the following steps: We were guided by the following questions:What are the key climate hazards linked to agriculture?How and where do they interact with agricultural vulnerability and adaptations to create climate risk hotspots?Literature source (justification and description):We searched SCOPUS and Web of Knowledge databases because they contain a substantial collection of relevant research, and because they perform precisely and reproducibly when using an extensive Boolean search string, such as the one we used (Gusenbauer and Haddaway 2020). The search was limited to peer-reviewed literature, published since 2016 that included research conducted in SADC countries to enable compilation of the most recent evidence on climate risk and vulnerability across the region. Time constraints limited our ability to include research published prior to 2016. Only literature written in the English language was included.Literature was selected, screened, and then coded following the process and criteria outlined in Figure 2, which also details the search string and database fields used and the numbers of studies rejected at each step. The initial search was undertaken on May 5th 2020 by one researcher. Three researchers completed subsequent screening and coding.For quality control, all abstracts were double-screened, and retained for full review in the event of disagreement. Our initial search produced 759 research articles, which was reduced to a final set of 275 (Appendix A). Articles were generally excluded because they either did not focus on the SADC region, did not include empirical data (e.g. they were review papers), and/or did not identify findings or use data about the specified climate-related topics linked to agriculture (Figure 2).1.2.4.Photo: Ryan Searle-unsplashMethods of analysis:We developed a set of questions and a corresponding coded Excel spreadsheet to extract and store information from the papers.The same three researchers performed the coding exercise after piloting the questions and coded template. The final output was an Excel spreadsheet providing information about the location of the research, the focal agricultural system and climate hazards, and whether the research was vulnerability-and/or adaptation-oriented.We included only peer-reviewed data in our review in an attempt to assure research included was rigorous. More rigorous controls on information quality were precluded by time constraints. However, greater consideration of data quality was given to research included as climaterisk hotspot case studies.(Figure 2). The 23 articles published to April in 2020 and that met our review criteria, suggest a continuing trend. More research was conducted in Tanzania than any other SADC country, featuring in nearly one quarter (22%) of articles (Figure 2). South Africa, Zimbabwe, Malawi and Zambia were also frequently the geographic focus (occurring in between 14-18% of articles). The remaining 11 SADC countries received less attention.Only two studies were conducted in Lesotho and one in Mauritius and Comoros, and we did not find any research meeting our criteria conducted in the Seychelles. Fifty-five papers had a regional or global focus. Drought, temperature and precipitation were the hazards most frequently linked to agricultural systems. Sea-level rise and hazards linked to salinization were seldom the focus of investigation. Most (87%) of the articles reviewed included analysis of food crops. Livestock systems were considered in approximately one third of articles, whilst non-food crops, aquaculture and agroforestry systems received much less attention. The majority of studies focussed on agricultural system vulnerability to climate hazards. However, nearly half researched adaptation, and nearly one quarter (23%) were concerned with both. By mid-century, the likelihood of droughts increases in both RCP4.5 and 8.5 scenarios (Figure 3 and Figure 4). In RCP8.5, drought risk increases across most of the region, while in RCP4.5, droughts become more common primarily in the DRC, parts of East Africa, Angola and Namibia. The result of these changes in droughts is that in both RCP4.5 and 8.5 by mid-century droughts are common in most of the SADC region (Figure 5 and Figure 6). However, droughts are more severe in RCP8.5 than 4.5, although the most severe droughts remain rare. Extreme rainfall increases by mid-century in both RCP4.5 and 8.5 in most of the northern SADC region. The increases in extreme rainfall are larger in RCP8.5 than in 4.5, and more widespread (Figure 7 and Figure 8). R95 is an indicator of an extreme that occurs on a yearly basis. Figure 9 and Figure 10 show that by mid-century, rainfall between 12-25 mm/day should be a yearly occurrence in the northern SADC region under RCP4.5 and 8.5.Recent research in East Africa has shown that there is a risk of landslides in susceptible areas (susceptibility depends on topography, land cover and soil type) with antecedent rainfall between 9.2 and 22 mm (Monsieurs et al. 2019). Research in the Sahel region has also shown floods are associated with 5-day rainfall totals of 30mm or more (Tazen et al. 2019). Rainfall at these levels could therefore be associated with risks of landslides and floods. . Overlaid on vulnerability map where red = more vulnerable, blue = less vulnerable. . Overlaid on vulnerability map where red = more vulnerable, blue = less vulnerable. By 2059, under a medium GHG emissions scenario, extreme rainfall events will be a yearly occurence in the north and east of the SADC region By 2059, most countries in the north of the SADC region, and Madagascar, will experience extreme rainfall events under a medium GHG emissions scenario By 2059, extreme rainfall events will be more widespread, including Losotho and parts of South Africa, under a high GHG emissions scenario By 2059, under a high GHG emissions scenario, extreme rainfall events will be a yearly occurence for much of the north and east of the SADC regionFigure 11 represents the combined vulnerability index at national (inset) and district level. Vulnerability across the SADC region varies, with higher national-level vulnerability found in northern and eastern countries, including the DRC, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar. There is a greater degree of variability between districts with, for example, countries such as Madagascar and areas such as northern Mozambique and south-western Angola demonstrating higher vulnerability. South Africa exhibits lowest overall levels of vulnerability, though urban districts (e.g. surrounding Pretoria and Johannesburg and in the south-western tip near to Cape Town) demonstrate the lowest vulnerability at a sub-national level. Risk hotspots for extreme rainfall under a medium GHG emissions scenario are found in Tanzania and Madagascar, but medium high risk is widespreadSo far an overlay method has been used to provide a visual description of the impact of climate change across the SADC region, and where areas of greater vulnerability are located. However, the locations where the extremes in both climate hazard and vulnerability (i.e. hotspots) are located are difficult to identify. Bivariate choropleth maps enable the range of climate hazard to be combined with vulnerabilities within the same districts so that potential hotspots of concern can be identified.Presented are the bivariate maps for combined current vulnerability within districts and future rainfall and drought under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios. Vulnerability is represented from high (red), medium high (orange), medium low (green) and low (blue), while climate hazards are represented by colour shading from high (darker) to low (lighter) risk. Figure 12 suggests that there are hotspots of high rainfall and high vulnerability, therefore climate risk hotspots, along the northern coast of Madagascar (particularly Antsiranana and Toamasina) and along the coast of Lake Nyasha/Malawi (particularly the east coast around Ruvuma in Tanzania). Some further potential hotspots can also be seen along the eastern border of the DRC and the coasts of Angola and Mozambique. In comparison to the RCP.4.5 scenario, under RCP.8.5 there is little change between potential hotspots (Figure 13). Risk hotspots for extreme rainfall under a high GHG emissions scenario are found in Tanzania and Madagascar, but medium high risk is widespread across northern countries Risk hotspots for drought under a high GHG emissions scenario are found in Tanzania, but medium high risk is widespreadPotential hotspots of vulnerability to and risk of extreme droughts can be seen under the RCP4.5 scenario along Lake Nyasha/Malawi with medium high vulnerability, and high drought risk seen across extensive areas of Namibia, northern Zambia, inland Tanzania, and across large areas of the DRC (Figure 14). Under the RCP8.5 scenario the hotspots do not change significantly, with some climate risk reduced along the coast of Lake Nyasha/Malawi, and some increase in the area of the hotspot along the coast of Namibia (particularly IIKaras) (Figure 15).It is clear across all the hotspot bivariate maps that mediumhigh climate risk (high vulnerability, medium-high climate hazard) is widespread under both future scenarios (RCP4.5 and 8.5) and for extreme rainfall and droughts across Angola, DRC, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar. Risk hotspots for drought under a medium GHG emissions scenario are found in Tanzania, but medium high risk is widespread Photo: Sonja Leitner (ILRI)Comparing the climate risk maps with some previous studies Three studies were identified that have taken a broadly similar approach to climate risk mapping and the identification of climate risk hotspots across a broadly similar set of countries in Southern Africa: Thornton et al (2008) who examined poverty and climate change for sub-Saharan Africa; Midgley et al (2011) who mapped climate risk and vulnerability for Southern Africa, and Herding for Health (2020) who conducted a climate vulnerability assessment for Southern Africa's rangelands (excluding Tanzania, Malawi and DRC).In the Thornton et al ( 2008) study hotspots of climate hazard were identified using Global Climate Models (GCMs) to calculate changes to the length of the growing season, combined with an agricultural system classification. This enabled agricultural systems at risk to be identified. Hotspots of vulnerability were identified by mapping 14 vulnerability indicators from across the capital assets, including soils, distance to markets, governance, incidence of malaria, etc. A principle components analysis was used to create four factors, explaining 63% of the variance, which were combined using the percentage variance explained to weight each factor, normalised and then quartiled. A qualitative synthesis of the results identified hotspots of vulnerability to climate change in the mixed rainfed crop-livestock systems of the Sahel, and in the great lakes region and mixed agricultural systems of East Africa. Livestock and mixed rainfed systems were considered most vulnerable to future changes in climate. Direct comparisons are difficult because of differences in spatial coverage. The creation of indices, and the use of quartiles to aggregate the data mean that areas and countries identified as high climate risk are done so in comparison to the other areas and countries included in the analysis. Each study has also used a different combination of climate models, with our study using the CORDEX-Africa ensemble rather than CMIP5 ensembles used in the other studies.. These models will have evolved in accuracy over time, from 2008 when the earliest study was undertaken (Thornton et al, 2008) to this study and that by Herding for Health in 2020. The data underlying the vulnerability and exposure indices used in all the studies will also have been updated over time.Nevertheless, all four studies identify comparatively higher climate risks for the areas further north and east in their study regions, from parts of Zambia and Mozambique for Herding for Health (2020); parts of Angola, DRC, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania and Madagascar for Midgley et al (2011); parts of Angola, DRC, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar in this study, to the Sahel and parts of East Africa for Thornton et al (2008). This highlights the importance of considering vulnerabilities (in agricultural and social systems) as well as climate hazards (i.e. droughts or extreme rainfall events). Vulnerability in particular is likely to be behind the spatial patterns of increasing climate risk found in all these studies. As a result, all of these studies suggest that efforts to reduce climate risk should be targeted particularly to areas (and countries) in the north and north-east of the SADC region where vulnerabilities are highest.From the systematic review 60 papers were identified as meeting our criteria for Tanzania, with 10 having conducted research in medium high vulnerability and medium high climate hazard areas for both extreme rainfall events and drought (Figure 12 to Figure 15), including two in the hotspot identified in the plateau region in the south west of the country near lake Nyasa/Malawi (Kangalawe 2017;Luhunga 2017). Luhunga (2017) undertook an assessment of the impacts of climate change on maize yields in the southern highlands and plateau region of southern Tanzania. They used a climate crop model, using CORDEX-Africa climate models, to simulate maize yields under different future scenarios. They found that maize yields may decrease by up to 10% (under RCP8.5) in the hotspot region (Figure 15) due to increased temperatures and a shortening of the growing season caused by reductions in rainfall. Kangalawe (2017) conducted participatory rural assessments to understand perceptions of changing climate in Mbinga District, within the hotspot identified by our bivariate mapping (Figure 12 to Figure 15). Here, villagers report decreasing river flows and decreasing water availability for both agriculture and domestic purposes, in line with our hotspots for drought (Figure 14 and Figure 15). These reductions in available water have led to expansion of agriculture into wetland areas with subsequent losses of diversity, but also the shrinkage of wetland areas as river flows decrease and water use increases. A trebling of the population in this region (up to 120 people per square kilometers) indicates increasing exposure of the population to increasing drought. These findings are supported by Kassain et al. (2017) whose participatory research in the Iringa region also found perceptions of a decline in river flows over the last 20 years following declines in rainfall. This has led to impacts on water levels in irrigation channels, over-utilisation of available water, and reductions in yields. Both Kangalawe (2017) and Kassain et al. (2017) found that farmers were likely to implement measures such as deepening wells, expanding irrigation channels, or expanding agriculture into wetland areas that would be considered maladaptive. While some adaptation measures, such as tree planting for water conservation, are understood, they are not widely undertaken. There is a clear need for more work to understand, and implement, adaptation options in this region.In addition to research in the southern highlands and plateau region, research has been undertaken in the northern highlands, specifically on Mount Kilimanjaro in northern Tanzania. This area also falls under the medium high vulnerability and medium to medium high climate hazard. Here the focus is very much on coffee production, given the importance of these highlands to producing this important export crop. The work by Rahan et al. (2018) developed a coffee crop model, linked to climate and soils data, to understand the effect of changing climate on yields. They found that increasing temperatures and drought stress are likely to reduce yields by as much as 32%, although increased carbon dioxide concentrations may go some way towards mitigating this effect. Their work suggests that a common strategy of using shade plants may not be beneficial under conditions of water stress. In addition, Azrag et al. (2018) predicted the distribution of an important coffee pest, Antestiopsis thunbergii, under climate change on Mount Kilimanjaro. Their work suggests that the risks of pest infestation at lower elevations are likely to decrease under climate change, but would be offset by increased risks occurring at higher elevations.Finally, a set of 3 papers were identified by our systematic review covering the alluvial plans and semi-arid regions found in central Tanzania, an area of medium high vulnerability and medium to medium high climate hazards. Näschen et al. (2019) used the CORDEX-Africa climate models to examine the impact of climate change on water resources in the Kilombero region. They found increasing temperatures, and particularly intensification of the season with extreme flooding and drought, along with shifts in peak river flows will become more pronounced. Some farmers are already aware of changes to climate in the region, with rainfall becoming more unpredictable (Balama et al. 2016). Here, farmers are already implementing adaptation strategies through changes to planting calendars, uptake of agricultural technologies, crop diversification and the use of non-timber forest products to supplement incomes and household consumption. Osewe et al. (2020) have also found evidence of farmer led adaptation schemes, particularly farmer led irrigation schemes. However, more research is needed on these autonomous strategies to assess how robust and climate smart they are.TANZANIA Only two of the 23 studies identified by our systematic literature review were carried out in the hotspots identified through the mapping of climate hazard and vulnerability outlined above. This suggests a possible mismatch between locations where climate risk is likely to be highest and where research on impacts of and adaptation to climate change is being conducted. Here we outline what we know from the research that has been undertaken in our hotspots, but also more broadly in the countries where the hotspots occur.Few studies meeting our criteria were retrieved from the literature search for Madagascar, and none were conducted in the areas identified as climate risk hotspots along the northern coast (Figure 12 to Figure 15). However, locations subject to medium-high vulnerability and rainfall or drought related hazards have received research attention. Eight studies in these locations explored local agricultural practices and related knowledge, and adaptation options to reduce climate-related production risks.The Lake Alaotra region in north eastern Madagascar currently experiences variable wet and dry episodes during the rainy season (Bruelle et al. 2017), and is at high risk of future extreme rainfall events, and moderately-highly vulnerable under both RCP 4.5 and 8.5 projections (Figure 12 and Figure 13) Rain-fed rice production, which characterises and is expanding on the hillsides as a result of the increasing food needs of the growing local population, is highly susceptible to rainfall variability, and resulting water stress and impoverished soils (Bruelle et al. 2017;Penot et al. 2018). Research using simulated water × soil × rice interactions indicates the use of conservation agriculture (CA) in these areas mainly increased water loss because of drainage in the majority of conditions, and that crop growth was least affected when sown in November regardless of other interactions. Simulations and findings suggest mulching widened the favourable sowing window towards early dates, reduced associated risks by enhancing water capture and storage during the first erratic rains of the season, and increased crop yields (Bruelle et al. 2017). However, Penot et al. (2018), highlight high abandonment rates by upland rice farmers adopting CA in the same region over a 10-year period, partly because of difficulties implementing technologies including mulching, and perceived risk of crop failure, especially when disappointed by losses or yields early on. Abandonment was lower by those farming colluvial land because costs were often offset by yields. However, findings overall indicate >5-7 years of practice was needed for CA to persist. Despite high drop-out, the use of CA technologies was sustained by farmers fully convinced of their benefits, albeit in diversified forms reflecting innovation that tailored cropping systems to individual circumstances.Rainfall in Madagascar's mid-west is also erratic, with droughts alternating with intense rainfall events (Randrianjafizanaka et al. 2018), which are forecast to pose high future risk to moderately or highly vulnerable farming communities (Figure 12 and Figure 13). Here, rice-maize rotations predominate in upland areas on impoverished soils that attract weeds, including Striga asiatica, which suppress yields and increases labour demand. Randrianjafizanaka et al. (2018) present evidence that illustrates how different combinations of zero-tillage, intercropping and mulching CA strategies promoted as adaptations to soil and climatic constraints, can also delay and reduce (although not eradicate) the impact of S. asiatica parasitism in rice and maize crops, particularly when partially-resistant rice varieties are integrated into the system. Methods to assess accessibility of insurance to compensate for losses associated with climate hazards, have also been researched in this region. Focussing on rice cultivation, Möllmann et al. (2020) found that remotelysensed vegetation health indices provided considerably higher explanatory power for credit risk related to the variability of borrowers' yields, than indices derived from the more often used meteorological data which is scarce, and hence less reliable in regions like this. Lower credit risk, and thus predicted default rates, allow lending institutions to reduce interest rates, potentially enhancing farmers' access to the credit often critical for elevating and sustaining production.In the semi-arid south, maize composite varieties have been developed from local landraces to produce higher-yielding plants more tolerant of local climatic and agronomic conditions than the old landraces or obsolete hybrid varieties smallholder farmers often rely on (Masoni et al. 2020). The authors emphasise that maize has become Madagascar's second staple food in recent years, and highlight its potential contribution to future food security because it has lower water demand than rice. On the southeast coast, the high risk of extreme rain events in the future looms large for a potentially vulnerable farming community (Figure 12 and Figure 13) already prone to flooding and drought (Kruger 2016). During interviews and focus groups, farmers described early and late-planting, and using short-cycle cassava and yam varieties to increase resilience to hazards. In certain areas however, farmers have been unable to mitigate the lack of infrastructure to store water, and floods that destroy crops every year. In the southwest, drought is projected to be a greater hazard (Figure 14 and Figure 15), and conditions are already harsh. Very low amounts of rainfall on the Mahafaly plateau, and famine regularly affects those dependent on rain-fed production (Neudert et al. 2015).Knowledge accumulated and transmitted locally related to climatic extremes and changing resource use is presented by Fritz-Vietta et al. (2017) to identify principles for inherent sustainable land management: management based on context specific values, socio-cultural norms, and the knowledge and perceptions of the local population, to enable future adaptation to environmental change. A different approach to facilitating adaptation to the dry and drying climate in the southeast is provided by Fust and Schlecht (2018), who developed a spatially explicit agent-based model to simulate livestock production systems, with the objective of sustaining the economic and food security of livestock keepers faced with impoverished forage yields and variable pasture quality. The model integrates metabolic energy costs due to pastoral herd movements in search of forage, incorporates seasonal dynamics in forage quality in terms of feed digestibility, and relates forage availability and quality to climatic conditions.MADAGASCAR https://bit.ly/SADCFuturesForesight"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3528295374.json b/main/part_2/3528295374.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7eb0b2ba53f2f5f0e028c712c8c0a016223d2c66 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3528295374.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d7aa18359c9bfcdad3637be2f92eb538","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3ab80cdd-f4b0-4cfc-ac08-0385d0094362/content","id":"1011596174"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ae1b17ac-ef37-4eec-8758-ef8a92d5d1eb","content":"El presente manual describe el funcionamiento general de la desgranadora estacionaria T2RM-DSG20 accionada por un tractor de 2 ruedas. Se muestran y describen los componentes principales, así como información técnica para poder llevar a cabo de manera correcta los ajustes necesarios para un buen funcionamiento, un buen mantenimiento preventivo para alargar la vida útil de la herramienta agrícola.Las indicaciones presentadas en este manual están dirigidas a personal con conocimiento específico sobre las funciones y uso de maquinaria agrícola debidamente instruido. Se recomienda siempre acompañar la máquina en caso de traspaso o venta con el manual ya que es parte indispensable para su correcta operación y mantenimiento.El presente manual contiene dibujos e ilustraciones con algunas especificaciones técnicas que no pueden divulgarse o transmitirse, total o parcialmente, a terceros sin la autorización escrita del fabricante de la máquina.La desgranadora T2RM-DSG20 toma en cuenta la capacidad de trabajo de los productores de pequeña escala, su tamaño es adecuado y la necesidad de potencia para su accionamiento puede ser desde motores de 5.5 hp, con este tipo de herramientas se pretende mecanizar las operaciones agrícolas de poscosecha como el desgrane, el cual requiere de mucho tiempo si se realiza con herramientas tradicionales. El accionamiento de la desgranadora se da mediante el acople de la toma de fuerza de un tractor de 2 ruedas BCS.Imagen 2. Montaje de la desgranadora con el tractor. 1)Tractor de 2 ruedas, 2) Desgranadora, 3) Eje de transmisión de movimientoEl operador deberá colocar adecuadamente la flecha desde el punto de acople tractor hacia el punto de acople de la desgranadora. los manillares del tractor de 2 ruedas deberán ser rotados con un giro de 180 para que no estorben al momento del enganche.Se debe cuidar que las palancas de mando queden correctamente colocados al momento de realizar la rotación y evitar que se desprendan o desacomoden durante la puesta en marcha del motor.Se debe revisar que el motor se encuentre en condiciones de trabajo antes de encenderlo. Los niveles de aceite y combustible deben ser los adecuados. Las palancas de accionamiento deberán estar en paro y la palanca de velocidades en neutral. El accionamiento de la desgranadora deberá empezar en vacío, es decir, no deberá estar presente material o mazorca dentro de la máquina, una vez establecido el encendido se procederá a introducir material en la entrada, se debe verificar el grano en la salida principal para descartar daño mecánico, en caso de existir daño se deberá reducir el régimen de trabajo del motor y nuevamente observar el grano en la salida principal. Alta velocidad de trabajo regularmente causa daño mecánico en el grano.La desgranadora T2RM-DSG20 cuenta con 2 ruedas de hule para poder ser transportada de manera sencilla, el operador solamente debe inclinar el equipo sujetando el asa.Imagen 3. Forma correcta de transportar la desgranadora estacionariaSe recomienda hacer una revisión antes de iniciar el trabajo, poniendo especial atención en el enganche de implemento a la toma de fuerza del tractor de 2 ruedas. Revisar la integridad de todos los componentes y que no exista elementos o materiales que generen una obstrucción en la cámara que cubre al cilindro desgranador.A continuación, se enlistan una serie de puntos de revisión antes de encender el motor del tractor de 2 ruedas y de accionar la desgranadora.Una vez terminado el uso del implemento es aconsejable realizar la limpieza con ayuda de un cepillo o escoba eliminando polvos o restos de mazorca u olote del interior. Si el implemento será guardado por un largo periodo, se recomienda cubrirla con un plástico para minimizar los daños por el ambiente."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3537481070.json b/main/part_2/3537481070.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6bba76ec086b3ceedf8fa6c7367ac97786cc3db0 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3537481070.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4495005d7638159d8767a9b8c7345add","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5ae16ea3-4f81-470f-81ae-dab53c3b68a8/retrieve","id":"-1399103763"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d0d6928d-d081-4427-88a4-9742a9dfbfe8","content":"Titles in this series aim to disseminate interim research on the scaling of climate services and climatesmart agriculture in Africa, in order to stimulate feedback from the scientific community.Agriculture is critical to Africa's economic growth and development, accounting for more than one-fifth of sub-Saharan Africa's economic output. However, climate change is expected to make agricultural development more difficult in many parts of Africa (Carr et al., 2022;Trisos et al., 2022).Adaptation and mitigation to climate change are imperative. CORAF has worked with partners in West and Central Africa to develop over 320 agricultural technologies and innovations to improve agricultural productivity and livelihoods. Technologies and innovations developed include cover crop varieties, livestock breeds and seeding techniques, as well as post-harvest applications across multiple agricultural value chains including roots and tubers, dry cereals, rice, plantains, milk, meat and fish technology and innovation (Ganyo et al., 2022).Unfortunately, smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa are faced apart of climate change challenge, the challenge of having access to funding, specifically for the acquisition of technologies and innovations that can promote the effective implementation of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA). Yet, when these funds are available, their prompt disbursements are often impeded by cumbersome administrative processes, issues related to lack of understanding and communication between technicians, politicians, and implementers, etc. While there are policy documents that guide the development of the agricultural sector in relation to climate-smart agriculture.We present the need of expression of 12 West and Central African countries to scale up climate smart agriculture and build on it as strategy to cope climate change. This info note highlights the climate change policy measures in West and Central African countries that can accelerate the acquisition and scaling up of CSA technologies and innovations (T&Is) in the region, the need of expression and quantification of CSA technologies and innovations, pathways for scaling and actions to materialize the need expressed. • Pathways for scaling the prioritized technologies included mainly ongoing projects and/or programmes such as FSRP, GIRAV, PROPAD, and projects in pipeline at regional or national levels. Regarding physical investments, measures identified are those applying/promoting climate-smart and conservation agriculture through best agricultural practices that improve soil fertility and increase crop yields and integrate crops and livestock. The best agricultural practices as measures against climate change also include the use of innovative and adaptive approaches of irrigation that ensure better water management (water harvesting and use). The physical actions also concern investments in adequate infrastructure, social services, and agricultural mechanization.Moreover, climate change policies highlight as measures capacity building of actors specially researchers in research centres and universities for innovation, both in science on CC, and technology to cope with CC. These specific capacity-building measures will enable to provide adequate support for instance the development of appropriate crop varieties and production practices that will enhance resilience to variability in rainfall. Therefore, countries can improve research and knowledge management capacities through training/capacity building at all levels (from institutions to farmers).Finally, the mainstreaming of climate change into agricultural development strategies, the improvement of planning and coordination of the use of natural resources as well as the strengthening and empowering of local institutions are pursued as institutional strengthening measures to cope with CC. Expressions of need for the adoption and dissemination of climate-smart agriculture cover plant, animal, and fish value chains. Overall, technologies and innovations pointed out are improved crop seeds varieties (cereals, tubers and roots, vegetables, legumes), fertilizers and inoculum, agricultural equipment used along agricultural value chains, animal and fish fry and its inputs as technologies and innovations. Some immaterial needs were also point out by countries. There are trainings on SRI technology and bovine artificial insemination. CSA technologies and innovations sought are those that ensure (i) sustainable increase of agricultural productivity and food security; (ii) adaptation and building of resilience in face of climate change and (iii) reduction or elimination where possible, of greenhouse gases emissions. Table 1 shows the need and quantification of CSA T&I. The expression of quantities is contained in policy documents or derived from. Adopting and disseminating CSA technologies and innovations as approach to reduce climate impacts and be adapted to climate change effectively required economic investments. Investments mostly can be gotten mostly through on-going projects and programmes or those in the pipeline at national and regional levels. However, to ensure the sustainability of investments and the definitive integration of CSA into daily practices, it is desirable for states to have their own funding mechanism or source, as project funding does not guarantee the continuity of actions. Increase grants and institutional supports from governments to actors can be a strategy to operationalize the acquisition of CSA T&I and scaling CSA. On the other hand, regional monetary and economic institutions such as UEMOA in West Africa and CEMAC in Central Africa could, through an own innovative mechanism, support the CSA and CIS initiatives led by CORAF and AGRHYMET, two regional institutions that deliver CSA and CIS T&I respectively.• CORAF plays a central role by coordinating agricultural research and development in West and Central Africa, with focus on technologies and innovations development and scaling. To move from estimates to action, CORAF plans to (i) to initiate a dialogue with the national authorities (ii) provide an advocacy guide to be used with current programmes to facilitate the acquisition of CSA T&I.• Also, CORAF creates enabling environment to acquire the target T&I through advocacy with on-going projects and programmes to purchase and by contracting a consultant specialist on international trade to facilitate the acquisition of the targeted technologies.• Countries will continue the advocacy work, using a guide provided by CORAF for this purpose and including the purchase of CSA T&I in the 2024 work plans and budget. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3551845191.json b/main/part_2/3551845191.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a28de33e3093638239cf2c48be9830a0bdadf3cc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3551845191.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a16e54f0088560a73f1135f4252fee3e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7dc9f9a6-317b-44e5-aadf-66803e71184f/retrieve","id":"1138336178"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"19505d79-fca5-4881-ad8e-721192825bcb","content":"➢ Chickpea is an important protein source for many households as well as a good cash crop. ➢ Well-drained Vertisols are best suited for chickpea production. It can be grown as a second crop using remaining residual soil moisture ➢ Chickpea is little labor intensive, especially compared to cereal crop ➢ Chickpea can fix 60-176 kg N ha -1 in association with rhizobia; it is 60-80%percent of its nitrogen requirement. Sufficient soil phosphorus is required for optimal nitrogen fixation of chickpea.Why N2Africa focus on chickpea?• Productivity of chickpea is yet below the global averages and what is obtained at on-farm demonstrations and highly variable n different agro-ecologies of Ethiopia. • Sub-optimal agronomic practices, malnutrition of the soil and lower use of improved varieties highly contribute to the poor yields of chickpea in Ethiopia • Soil and seed borne diseases and insects do have significant chickpea yield loss in Ethiopia.• N2Africa project has made notable contribution in raising the national rhizobiology research and development expertise, identify new indigenous elite chickpea rhizobial strains via bioprospecting, and selection, sharing of strains among partners and inoculant technology supply chain.• N2Africa established a platform of coalition of the willing to exchange elite chickpea rhizobial strains among Hawassa University, Menagesha Biotech Industry and Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research; and with multiple partner for the supply chain of inoculant technology.• The exchange platform has helped the institutions to mutually reassess the shelved elites in uniform protocol and finally to have common elites such as CP-11, CP-63 and CP-M7 etc.• Farmers' preferred high yielding, diseases resistant and marketable varieties were identified. Kabuli type chickpea varieties are excellent nodulators, high yielders and yet are relatively susceptible to soil borne diseases as compared to desi type chickpea varieties.• N2Africa evidences indicated that application of inoculation and P fertilizer have resulted in increased chickpea yield (from at least 3% relative responses and more) for 99% of farms involved in the on-farm demonstration trials, irrespective of differences in agro-ecological location. • A significant number of smallholder farmers could benefit both agronomically and economically from application of rhizobium inoculants and P fertilizer to chickpea.• Generally, positive responses to P&/or I applications could be lacking on some farms due to several factors. Diagnosing the real cause of non-responsiveness of soils is critical for the specific legume growing environment. For instance, N2Africa verified that application of 30 kg S ha-1 (sulfur) helped chickpea farms to respond to the P+I application at Gonder Zuria woreda, Northern Ethiopia.• Where insufficient N and rhizobium concentrations of <10 2 -10 3 g -1 of soil, chickpea demands inoculation.• Co-dressing of chickpea seed with rhizobial inoculant and fungicides, i.e. Apron star (2 g a.i. per kg seed) do not harm rhizobia and nitrogen fixation process substantially as compared to inoculant alone. Hence, fungicide and inoculant can be co-dressed during chickpea planting. However, the fungicide dressing precedes the rhizobial inoculant (which is done right before planting).1.6 1.7 1.71.81.81.91.9 2.0 "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3560072326.json b/main/part_2/3560072326.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de8043407db1dcafb8e178190c02919f25c4db7f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3560072326.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"175809187737d49d09b6a86153779877","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1192941e-fcdc-46f3-b910-4ecf77be551c/retrieve","id":"793959537"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f219564d-8ab9-4d56-966d-016d2beb8e06","content":"Science for a food secure future CGIAR is a global partnership that unites organizations engaged in research for a food secure future. CGIAR research is dedicated to reducing rural poverty, increasing food security, improving human health and nutrition, and ensuring more sustainable management of natural resources. It is carried out by the 15 centers who are members of the CGIAR Consortium in close collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations, including national and regional research institutes, civil society organizations, academia, and the private sector.www.cgiar.org/AR2012 Foreword 1 As CGIAR begins its fourth year of reform, it is important to take stock of our efforts, recognize the enormous progress we have made to date, as well as the challenges we still face, and ensure that we are making the most of new opportunities to optimize the impact of our research for the benefit of the poor. In this regard, CGIAR made strong progress in 2012, marked by critical milestones and important developments ranging from scientific breakthroughs, to historical gains in funding, to landmark achievements in how we conduct our business. We solidified our commitment to a programmatic approach to research with a fully approved portfolio of CGIAR Research Programs; launched initiatives to ensure that gender equality is a top priority in all aspects of our work; took steps to create a more performance-based system; and generated new knowledge, tools, and technologies, including agricultural innovations that are nutrition-sensitive and climate smart. This year's Annual Report showcases how new ways of doing research are improving the incomes, food security, and health and wellbeing of poor smallholders and their families, and illustrates the importance of strategic partnerships in delivering that impact. Success stories range from linking small-scale producers of chili peppers in Bolivia and Peru with international markets, to blending traditional knowledge with modern technologies to sustainably increase the productivity of farmers, fishers, and livestock keepers in the Zambezi River basin in southern Africa.As part of our work to exploit the potential of agriculture to improve nutrition and health, in 2012 CGIAR and its partners made available four new biofortified food crops to farmers in India, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Zambia. In addition to containing higher levels of critical nutrients, the crops -beans, cassava, maize, and pearl millet -are high yielding and drought or heat tolerant, offering the potential for significant nutritional benefits in regions that are increasingly affected by climate change. In India and Zambia, CGIAR is partnering with private seed companies to ensure that new varieties get into farmers' fields with greater speed and scale, with the ultimate goal of combating malnutrition.Recognizing the importance of private-public partnerships to improve and accelerate access to the best technologies, knowledge, and innovation to achieve maximum impact for the poor, in 2012 CGIAR adopted its first ever system-wide Principles on the Management of Intellectual Assets. This groundbreaking policy will enable CGIAR to better harness the strengths of all partners so that the outcomes of CGIAR research can be used effectively by those who need them most. Ensuring that the results of our research move more quickly into the hands of smallscale farmers, fishers, and foresters will continue to be both a challenge and a priority in future.Complementing this effort, during the second CGIAR Funders Forum, donors endorsed the Strategy and Results Framework Action Plan developed by the CGIAR Consortium in 2012. The Plan, which also defines a set of goals and targets for good partnerships, promises an increased focus on impact-driven research by identifying more precise intermediate development outcomes for each of the CGIAR Research Programs. Clearly defined indicators will improve and streamline reporting, facilitate transparent decisionmaking, and better ensure that donors know what to expect from their investments, making the entire system more accountable.CGIAR also took a number of steps in 2012 to better meet the needs of poor rural women, reduce the gender gap in agriculture, and empower female farmers. In collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI), CGIAR developed a firstof-its-kind tool that measures the empowerment and inclusion of women in agriculture to document obstacles and constraints, and ultimately overcome them. Research by other CGIAR scientists identified opportunities for increasing women's earnings through the marketing of non-timber forestry products. And when women have more opportunities to flourish, everyone benefits. Food security increases, poverty drops, children are better nourished, and environmental stewardship improves.The first step to transforming people's lives through the benefits of agricultural research, however, often starts in an office or laboratory. And on that front, CGIAR also registered major accomplishments in 2012. Using the latest biotechnology tools, for example, scientists discovered in CGIAR's extensive seed collections a gene that enables rice plants to produce 20% more grain by increasing uptake of phosphorus. This discovery will enable small-scale farmers who cannot afford fertilizers for their poor soils to grow more rice, improving food security and incomes while conserving the world's rapidly diminishing reserves of rock phosphate. In Southeast Asia, rice farmers are already benefiting from new CGIAR technologies, including a mobile phone application that enables them to receive advice on applying the right type of fertilizer in the correct amount at the optimum time.None of these achievements, of course, would be possible without strong support from our valued investors. Despite fiscal difficulties and tight aid budgets among many of our donors, financial contributions to CGIAR continued to grow at a very robust rate, reflecting donors' confidence in CGIAR's ability to tackle some of the most pressing global development challenges. With more than a 20% increase in funding over the previous year, 2012 marked the single largest annual increase in funding in CGIAR's history, putting us well on track to reach our US$1 billion target in 2013.As elaborated in the financial section of this Annual Report, the increase in overall funding is just one indicator that the reform process is bearing fruit. The growth in contributions to CGIAR's multi-donor trust fund is perhaps an even better indicator of donors' commitment to key aspects of the reform. From 2011 to 2012, contributions received through the Fund increased by 33%. Of that, nearly two-thirds was provided as harmonized funding, enabling CGIAR to pool resources to finance research priorities and reflecting increasing interest in a multilateral approach to funding.Although CGIAR made considerable and noteworthy progress on many fronts in 2012, we are determined to do more and to do it better, so that every dollar received will deliver even greater benefits for poor rural communities in developing countries. CGIAR is committed to continually measuring and assessing the impact of our work to ensure that good intentions and best efforts consistently lead to tangible improvements in people's lives. But we certainly cannot do it alone. In order to fully reap the fruits of reform, we need to enhance and expand our collaborationwith civil society, national research partners, academia, development practitioners, new investors, and long-time donors. By working together, we are confident that we can ultimately achieve our mutual goals of eradicating poverty, conserving vital natural resources for future generations, and ensuring everyone's right to safe, nutritious, and sufficient food.In 2012, CGIAR continued to deliver innovative, comprehensive, and sustainable development solutions while strengthening collaborative research through the new CGIAR Research Programs brought about by reform.CGIAR's reform process was designed in large part to ensure that the knowledge generated by CGIAR scientists and their partners leads to results -for small-scale farmers, poor forest and fishing communities, national agricultural research systems, rural women, and policymakers. The changes brought about by reform -a Consortium to unite the Centers, a programmatic approach to research, a Fund to harmonize investments in that research, and a determined commitment to work inclusively with partner organizations to create synergies and maximize impact -are manifest in the new strategic focus and way in which CGIAR works. By the end of 2012, all 16 CGIAR Research Programs had been approved.Alleviating poverty, increasing food security, improving nutrition and health, and managing natural resources are all closely linked. The CGIAR Research Programs tackle these issues through a comprehensive strategy of research-fordevelopment -the CGIAR Strategy and Results Framework (SRF). The SRF is an evidence-based, impact-oriented agenda Partnership -GRiSP)  Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB)  Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE)  Wheat (WHEAT) that focuses explicitly on poor people in developing countries. The Programs position CGIAR to pursue innovative, comprehensive, and sustainable solutionssuch as crops resilient to extreme weather, pests and disease, and more efficient ways to manage water, trees, soils, livestock, fisheries, and forests -and to deploy technologies now available.In 2012, although all 16 CGIAR Research Programs had been approved and some had been operating for a year or more, others were only just getting started. During the transition from 'old' projects and programs to the new integrated Programs, CGIAR scientists continued to develop new knowledge and technologies, improve practices, contribute to policymaking, build capacity, and empower scientists, poor smallholders, and rural women.As the global population increases to a predicted nine billion by 2050, pressure mounts to produce more food without destroying the planet. Research to empower poor rural communities and raise the productivity of crops and agricultural systems -including livestock, fish, and agroforestry -will be essential to alleviate poverty and ensure food security. CGIAR Research Programs are designed to address these interrelated issues.In 2012, CGIAR scientists published 1,290 papers in peer-reviewed publications and produced many significant reports. In one key paper 1 scientists of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security 2 (CCAFS) described the expected impacts of climate change on the production of cassava and six other staple crops in sub-Saharan Africa -potato, maize, bean, banana, millet, and sorghum. A news release based on the article generated major coverage in the international media. The coverage contributed to a key goal of CCAFS -promoting options for adapting to climate change.The greatest burden of zoonotic diseasesdiseases transmitted from animals to humans and vice versa -falls on one billion poor livestock keepers. In poor countries zoonoses affect one in seven livestock, leading to 2.3 million people becoming ill and 1.7 million dying each year. CGIAR researchers in the Dynamic Drivers of Disease in Africa Consortium published a report 3 showing the links between poverty and regions prone to zoonoses. The report attracted wide media coverage and drew attention to diseases associated with agriculture, one of the issues being addressed by the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health 4 (A4NH). The report and an accompanying UK Institute for Development Studies (IDS) rapid response briefing for policymakers went 'viral' across the internet and print media and attracted, for example, the attention of Indian policymakers to the potential threats associated with zoonoses.CGIAR's International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and its partners in the Global Rice Science Partnership 5 (GRiSP) reported the discovery of a new gene in rice, the culmination of 10 years of research. The gene, PSTOL1, makes it possible for rice roots to absorb more phosphorus from the soil or fertilizers, thereby producing up to 20% more grain. This is particularly important for smallholder farmers who cannot afford to buy fertilizers.Sequencing the chickpea genome was also completed during the year. This groundbreaking research opens the door to much more efficient and effective improvement of the third most important grain legume in the world. The potential value of this is significant: grain legumes such as chickpea are the 'meat of the poor', providing protein and helping to meet other nutritional needs.Agricultural research-for-development takes place in the context of national, regional, and international agendas. In 2012 ). This first report, making the case for keeping food policy issues high on the global agenda, will serve as a reference for policymakers and stakeholders when discussing sustainable solutions for ending hunger and poverty.Feedipedia, a groundbreaking new website, is the fruit of a partnership between CGIAR's International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), which leads the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock and Fish, 7 the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and others. Feedipedia is a mine of information on animal feeds. The website describes 1,400 different types -from the traditional to the lesser known and unconventional -for a wide variety of livestock and fish farming systems. The information, gathered together for the first time in one place and accessible to all, will help boost small-scale livestock farming, increasing smallholder productivity and thus making meat, milk, and fish more available and affordable to consumers across the developing world.The first pan-African study of groundwater was also concluded, filling gaps in research on groundwater irrigation and water management. Arab Spatial was another important tool that was completed. This digital atlas contains maps and data for more than 150 food security and development-related indicators in the region. The atlas will provide researchers and policymakers with tools and information for strategic policy decisions at the subnational, national, and regional levels, based on the best and most up-to-date data and information available. Data sources include the World Bank's World Development Indicators databank, International Monetary Fund, World Health Organization, FAO, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, CGIAR, and IFPRI among other regional, national, and subnational statistical bodies.Work by CGIAR continues to change the lives of rural communities in developing countries. This has included developing a toolkit for rapidly assessing value chains, an index-based insurance to help Ethiopian pastoralists manage climate variability, and a new protocol for measuring and monitoring soil organic stocks to help advance understanding of their adaptation and mitigation potential.Modern maize breeding programs use the doubled haploid method, a technique for dramatically cutting the time and effort required to produce hybrids compared with conventional breeding. However, few public breeding programs or small-and mediumsize seed companies, especially in developing countries, use the procedure National Food Security Bill to provide affordable grains to more than half of its 1.2 billion people.  New initiatives such as Feed the Future, the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program, and South-South cooperation boosted agriculture investments.  Promoting mother and child nutrition gained momentum as it became widely accepted that the nutrition in the 1,000 days between conception and a child's second birthday are of crucial importance for the child's future.The bad news  High and extremely volatile food prices in the first half of the year threatened the food security of millions of people.  Biofuel policies in the United States of America (USA) and the European Union (EU) have not been changed to take into account their impact on land-use change and food price volatility.  The Doha Round of trade negotiations has still not been finalized, so countries continue to maintain domestic policies that undermine the trading prospects of developing countries and the sustainability of the global food system.  Setting a clear international standard or 'code of conduct' for large-scale foreign investment in land has received too little attention.  African countries are not meeting their target of allocating at least 10% of national budgetary resources to agriculture.  The international community responded slowly and too late to the disaster that was unfolding in the Horn of Africa.  Hunger still persists globally: nearly one billion people go hungry every day. The 2011 Global Hunger Index indicates that more than two dozen countries have 'alarming' or 'extremely alarming' hunger levels.(MAIZE) organized training courses in Latin America, Africa, and Asia to help breeders in these regions apply the doubled haploid method and to encourage them to become proactive in producing hybrids adapted to local environments. Breeders trained in the doubled haploid method will help speed the delivery of improved maize varieties to small-scale farmers and cooperatives. particularly as it is one of the few crops that thrives on poor land. Across large tracts of the poorer, less fertile parts of India, bread, chapatti, and porridge are made from millet flour. Improving the nutritional value of pearl millet could therefore make a big difference to people's health in these areas. In the states of Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Uttar Pradesh where pearl millet is a staple food, an estimated 70% of children under five are anemic, mainly due to iron deficiency. HarvestPlus launched a partnership with an Indian company, Nirmal Seeds Pvt. Ltd, to distribute iron-rich millet seeds more quickly to farmers. Nirmal Seeds is arranging field demonstrations to promote ICTP-8203Fe -a variety that is not only higher in iron but also gives 15% higher yields -and selling seed through its network of distributors. In 2012, Nirmal Seeds sold 180 tons of ICTP-8203Fe seed. More than 35,000 farmers in Maharashtra adopted the high iron variety ICTP-8203Fe.Pearl millet is just one of six crops being evaluated for their nutritional value -looking at Vitamin A, iron, or zinc levels -by the large cross-Center HarvestPlus Program, which breeds and develops biofortified crops. Once high-yielding varieties of staple foods with superior levels of micronutrients have been tested for their nutritional impact, the best will be rolled out on a large scale.Agricultural landscapes provide a variety of benefits apart from food production, such as ecosystem and hydrological services.Balancing the different functions will be important for managing natural resources sustainably in the twenty-first century. In CGIAR, WLE leads crosscutting research on agriculture and ecosystem services, which involves nearly all CGIAR Centers, as well as major international organizations such as the Stockholm Environment Center, The Nature Conservancy, Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD), and Ecoagriculture Partners. A working group on ecosystem functions in farming systems has developed a framework to integrate ecosystems services into agricultural land-use planning and decision-making as a way of sustainably increasing overall productivity. Other areas to be tackled include in situ agrobiodiversity as a way of increasing sustainability in diversified and intensified systems, managing ecosystem functions and agrobiodiversity, and methods to manage trade-offs between improving productivity and sustainably managing natural resources.In Africa, farmers are putting the results of work combining local and scientific knowledge of native species into practice on the steep slopes of Lake Tanganyika. They have planted two million indigenous trees, greatly improving hydrological servicessuch as stream flow, control of sediment deposited into the lake, and water quality downstream -and boosting rural livelihoods. The CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry 15 and the World Wildlife Fund are now scaling up practices and tools developed during this work -low-cost community nurseries for raising seedlings, tools to assist extension, and rural advisory services for farmers -as part of the Lake Tanganyika Regional Integrated Management Programme.Translating the results of research into development outcomes often depends on influencing national governments to make changes to policies. CGIAR researchwhich showed that banana-coffee systems are not only profitable, but also resilient to climate shocks -has led several coffeeproducing countries in East Africa and Central America that previously encouraged monocropping to change their recommendations. Based on the evidence, authorities are now advising farmers to intercrop coffee and banana. As well as reducing soil erosion, farmers not only earn more from intercropping but also spread risks, as crop failures seldom affect both coffee and banana simultaneously.In Peru, a new law takes into account research by WLE on payments for ecosystem services (PES) in the Cañete \"We are leaving the old paradigm of having trees cut and getting revenues from this, and entering a new era: the trees will stand, and at the same time revenues are received and people's welfare is improved.\" A CGIAR study 16 that modeled land-use changes contributed to modifications in the EU biofuel policy proposed by the European Commission in 2012. The modified policy proposal reduces the share of biofuels to be derived from food crops and would remedy some of the unintended environmental consequences of regulations on biofuels.On international climate change policy, CCAFS, with funding from the Global Donor Platform for Rural Development, set up the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change. The report of the Commission, published in 2012, made seven major recommendations and has influenced several governments. In Mexico, for example, Congress supported a draft climate change bill, which was subsequently passed as the General Climate Change Law 2012 -only the third such law in the world.In Bangladesh, Commissioner Mohammed Asaduzzaman used the findings in the report to validate Bangladesh's submission on agriculture to the UNFCCC's Subsidiary Body on Scientific and Technological Advice. In Kenya, the Commission's report was used as a reference when preparing Kenya's Agriculture Act 2012.An analysis of climate change and food systems 17 by CCAFS showed that agriculture and agricultural systems are highly vulnerable to climate change. The paper calculated emissions in all aspects of food production and distribution -direct emissions from crops and livestock, the indirect emissions of food production as a result of changes in land cover, emissions from manufacturing fertilizer, and from storing, transporting, and refrigerating food.A companion policy brief 18 concluded that a 'recalibration' of the food system will be required to ensure future food security and sustainable use of critical natural resources in a changing climate. In some contexts this may mean switching from major staples such as bananas to potatoes. The publications sparked debate in the media on the advantages and disadvantages of local as opposed to imported food, food waste, and the use of fertilizer, and influenced the climate change debate at the international level. The UN Committee on Food Security, for example, drew on the analysis to prepare its recommendations on climate change and food security.Gender inequalities affect access to and use of technology, land, water, forests, livestock, fisheries, education, income, investment, and labor. resources such as production inputs, knowledge, and improved technologies; and control over outputs such as harvested rice, processed rice, and other products.\"Providing opportunities for women in the agricultural sector is not only about gender empowerment. It is also about ensuring that the best minds, whether male or female, are given an equal chance to deploy their skills and energy as scientists, farmers, extension agents and others.\"Secretary, Global Forum onThe approach to gender taken by AAS similarly seeks to realize irreversible, deep, and enduring change for women. To create lasting change the AAS 'gender transformative approach' investigates the underlying causes of gender inequalities.Research addresses the unequal power dynamics that adversely affect household livelihoods. The Program works with men and women to reflect on and question existing norms, beliefs, practices, and structures. AAS also partners with organizations in the health and education sectors to learn from their approaches, methods, tools, and experience. In combination with strategies to develop the productivity of agricultural systems, the gender transformative approach will improve access to resources for production and control over life choices that affect development.The The \"We wanted to make Allanblackia a crop which would benefit large numbers of African farmers and biodiversity at the same time.\"Harrie Hendrikx, Unilever varieties can be delivered even more quickly and the benefits extended to Africa, this could have a significant global impact.GRiSP has also designed cooperatives for rice growers, producers, processors, and marketers to commercialize quality rice products. The reach of the CGIAR Research Programs means that the synergies of combining efforts can widen the impact by delivering innovations, such as these cooperatives, to several locations simultaneously. Pilot rice cooperatives backed by microfinance in Cameroon, Chad, and the Central African Republic currently involve around 179,000 farmers.Synergies along value chains that involve the private sector are a key feature of the Drought-Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) project run by IITA and CIMMYT, as part of the MAIZE Program. In Mali, linking up with private sector partner Faso Kaba Seeds has been important for promoting improved varieties, training farmers to produce seed, and setting up a distribution network for six popular crops, including drought-tolerant maize.In 2008, Faso Kaba Seeds contracted farmers to produce 100 tons of seed of drought-tolerant maize. By 2012, the company was producing 10-times more seed, employing 11 people, running its own seed cleaning and packing unit, and coordinating around 150 franchised stores.Without the collaboration between Faso Kaba Seeds and researchers, few farmers in Mali would be able to get hold of seed.The DTMA project is now developing drought-tolerant maize varieties and value chains for 13 countries in Africa.As At the heart of reform within CGIAR is a change in the way that we work with our network of partners to capture and respond to needs, and deliver results.In establishing the CGIAR Research Programs we are changing the way we work in order to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century. These changes acknowledge that the impact of our work will depend not only on the quality of our science and its relevance to people's needs, but on how we collaborate with partners. In this section of the Annual Report, we spotlight partnerships within our four areas of focus -reducing poverty, increasing food security, improving health and nutrition, and managing natural resources sustainably. More detail on these and other partnerships across CGIAR can be found on our website at www.cgiar.org/AR2012. Alimentos, which is developing new chili products using native chili peppers. So far, chilies have been bottled, canned, dried, made into jam, and used as an ingredient in specialty cheeses.Partnerships are at the heart of the project. Researchers, farmers, farmer associations, NGOs, foundations, private companies, universities, development agencies, national and international research institutions, Smallholder farmers, producers, and exporters along the value chain can see positive changes. Take Stefan Bederski, Chief Executive Officer of Agro Export Topará, a company that produces, processes, and exports organic certified chili products to the USA and EU. Twenty years ago, Stefan was stumped when clients asked about the attributes of the chili varieties he offered. Research is now providing him with the answers and helping Stefan fulfill his dream of promoting native Peruvian chilies in international markets. Originally, Agro Export Topará worked with commercial chili varieties, but after partnering in the research project, it has started using various native chilies.Commercializing native species has promise but needs to be done sustainably. This means conserving precious biodiversity. To do this, Peru has set up a genebank of 700 accessions -the most diverse national collection of native chili pepper varieties in the world -at the Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria, where accessions with commercially valuable traits are available. In Bolivia, a NGO, Centro de Investigaciones Fitoecogenéticas Pairumani, maintains a unique collection of 600 chili landraces and wild species.\"This case can be replicated and expanded around the world to help farmers who are struggling with declining commodity prices, and are looking for opportunities to increase their incomes through high-value, high-quality markets.\"The chili research project is an example of why partners are so important. Partnering to tackle failures in markets will raise incomes, make farming livelihoods more resilient, and prepare farmers to face future challenges, such as climate change.The CGIAR Research Program on Rice, known as the Global Rice Science Partnership (GRiSP), is a unique collaboration for impactoriented rice research-fordevelopment. GRiSP streamlines CGIAR rice research and aligns it to complement research by more than 900 partners worldwide.Rice is and will remain the most important crop in Asia, and is becoming significant in Latin America and Africa too. In all locations, fertilizers have a huge impact in boosting rice yields. But fertilizer is an expense that subsistence farmers cannot usually afford.When they can invest in fertilizers, most farmers do not have enough accurate information to know what type and combination to use, or how much or when to apply it to optimize productivity. One of the objectives of GRiSP is to bring down costs and increase profits for smallholder rice farmers -and one way to do this is by helping farmers make effective use of fertilizer. For production systems such as irrigated rice, where using fertilizer correctly can make a big difference in productivity and profitability, information and communications technology can provide farmers with timely site-specific advice on managing their crop.One such innovation is 'Nutrient Manager', a simple software package that gives farmers or extension workers pre-season and location-specific fertilizer recommendations that can be run on a mobile phone. Since its debut in the Philippines in 2011 and subsequent release in Indonesia in 2012, the Nutrient Manager for Rice Mobile has been providing rice farmers with specific advice on fertilizer for a particular rice field either by mobile phone or smartphone, or by internet. In 2012, a smartphone app, NMRiceApp, was also released in the Philippines.\"The Nutrient Manager is so fast and easy to understand.\" NMRiceApp, the smartphone equivalent, tends to be used more by extension workers with access to such phones -but it asks the same questions and gives the same result.NMRiceMobile and NMRiceApp put into practice the principles of site-specific nutrient management for rice that have been well established after more than a decade of research in Asia's major rice-\"The application is highly adaptable. We already have the web-based version in advanced testing. We can adapt that for a tablet or a smartphone, and we can move toward a cellphonebased short message service (SMS), like the one that already works well in the Philippines.\"growing areas. The knowledge that underpins them is also available in an online decision-making tool named Nutrient Manager for Rice, which is tailored to the rice-growing conditions of the specific country.In Indonesia, farmers in all provinces increased their rice yields and net income when switching from their current fertilizer practice to the practice recommended by NMRiceMobile. In most cases, the increase in net income for farmers exceeded US$100 per hectare per season. Indonesia has about 15 million rice farmers. If just a small proportion of these farmers adopt the recommendations it would correspond with a significant overall rise in farmer incomes, food security, and considerable national economic benefits.Farmers in Africa will soon have access to similar advice. CGIAR's Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) and its partners have conducted more than 300 fertilizer management trials since the 1990s, and have developed decision support systems for fertilizer recommendations. Databases drawing on this work and updated rice 'passport' data -the standard descriptors that characterize rice cultivars -as well as recent field observations, have been used to adapt the Nutrient Manager to West Africa.The Nutrient Manager has been calibrated for Senegal, and the application is currently being developed for other countries. In small-scale evaluations, Senegalese farmers who followed the recommendations of Nutrient Manager registered a yield increase of 1.9 tons per hectare or 35% compared to farmers' own practices, translating into an increase in net profitability of US$600 per hectare per year.However, the Nutrient Manager is not an end product, and requires further improvement including adding other crop management practices apart from nutrient management and choice of fertilizer types.Looking ahead, AfricaRice and its national partners will develop new decision support systems beyond the Nutrient Manager to address other concerns of farmers, in collaboration with partners in GRiSP.Improving nutrition and healthHelen Keller -founder of one of CGIAR's partner organizations, Helen Keller International (HKI)would have approved of leveraging and enhancing the synergies between agriculture, nutrition, and health to improve the wellbeing of poor people, especially women and young children. The idea jells with her philosophy that joint efforts can achieve much more than individual efforts.The CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), which is led by CGIAR's International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), works with key players in three areas that will make a difference to the nutrition and health of poor people, particularly women and children: making more nutritious and safer foods accessible to the underprivileged; integrating agriculture, nutrition, and health in development programs; and promoting, enabling, and supporting cross-sectoral policies and investment in health and nutrition. The research issues in the three areas are complex and span value chains, crops, diseases associated with agriculture, and development policies and programs. This means partnering across sectors and with a variety of players with different expertise.The partnership between IFPRI and HKI is a model of successful cooperation between researchers and an international NGO heavily involved in development programs on the ground. The collaboration between IFPRI and HKI, set to strengthen as A4NH gets fully under way, represents the kind of relationship that is critical to improving the nutrition and health of poor people and, more broadly, to reducing poverty, increasing food security, and managing natural resources more sustainably.\"Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.\"Helen Keller (1880-1968), Founder Helen Keller International networks, part of the evaluation, will also be helpful. They will provide information on how HKI's behavior change communications strategy has influenced women's health, improved their knowledge, and made a difference to children's nutrition. Documenting the success of these programs is critical to establish a body of scientific proof that small-scale agricultural programs improve nutrition, economic growth, and health. HKI is working with IFPRI in a number of countries to help build this evidence base.The findings of evaluations will be used to help plan further HKI homestead food production programs in Cambodia, Burkina Faso, and elsewhere. This type of partnership is an example of how development programs and researchers can work together to improve program design and implementation, and to optimize the potential for impact. Each contributes, according to their own area of expertise, to collecting rigorous evidence about the impact of programs, and explaining how and why impacts were achieved or not achieved.nutrition of mothers and children. The resulting 'program impact pathways', as they are called, show where and how programs could be modified or strengthened for a greater impact, and what might be helping or hindering their success. They also help IFPRI to design better ways to evaluate programs. In 2012, A4NH and CARE evaluated processes and undertook endline surveys to measure program impact in Burkina Faso. The evaluations over the next 2-5 years will provide the evidence needed to jointly develop the impact pathways and theory of change.Partnerships between researchers and those running development programs to provide evidence of what works and what does not are important because little has been done to date in this regard. In Burkina Faso, IFPRI and HKI did the first rigorous evaluation of a homestead food production program. HKI put some of the recommendations into practice straight away. The findings of a census of socialSustainably managing natural resourcesThe Zambezi River basin is a food basket for the landlocked southern African nation of Zambia. The river and surrounding floodplains support agriculture, fisheries, and livestock. Around three million people -a quarter of Zambia's populationdirectly rely on the Barotse Floodplain aquatic agricultural system for their livelihoods.Despite the natural potential of this dynamic wetland system, life for its inhabitants is beset with poverty and hardship. More than four out of five people live below the poverty line, over half of children under the age of 5 years are stunted, and HIV prevalence has risen by 2% over the past 5 years while the national rate has declined in the same period.The Barotse Floodplain exemplifies the challenges and opportunities faced by communities dependent on Africa's inland wetlands. Low agricultural productivity, poor infrastructure, and poorly developed agricultural value chains mean that Barotse communities are unable to tap into the growing market for rice, fish, and livestock products in the region.The CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems (AAS) aims to tackle these issues head-on through research that accelerates learning and brings together the combined knowledge of users, government, and civil society organizations. Since 2011, the AAS Program has been working in five countries across Africa, Asia, and the Pacific to raise agricultural and fish production, and expand the markets for produce in the regions. Zambia's Barotse Floodplain was selected early in the planning stage of the Program as one of three areas to focus on, along with Cambodia and the Solomon Islands. Working directly with local communities ensures that the Program fully considers community concerns and culture when designing and implementing activities. This participatory approach helps communities become custodians and beneficiaries of the natural resources on which they rely. As part of this ongoing process, the Program has empowered community members to tell their stories through a series of short films. These films provide a unique insight into the varied and interconnected issues that face the people of the Barotse Floodplain; their testimonies reinforce the need for a systems-based approach to development in the region.\"The Netherlands is proud to be a long-standing partner of the CGIAR, given that sustained investment in high-level research is an important first step in generating innovations that improve the livelihoods of poor smallholder farmers, fishers, and foresters. With current reforms and diverse partnerships, the CGIAR, a proven contributor to public knowledge on agricultural science and technology, is strongly positioned to continue to be relevant.\" CGIAR is committed to reducing the gender gap in agriculture and ensuring that research benefits and empowers rural women and meets the needs of poor female farmers. As part of recent reforms, we have redoubled efforts in this respect, knowing that we will not achieve lasting impact unless we take gender disparities into account in all aspects of our work. 2012 saw important steps forward in ensuring that research outputs and evidence have positive impacts on gender outcomes. The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index, launched in 2012, measures the empowerment, agency, and inclusion of women in the agriculture sector in developing countries, helping to identify ways to overcome those obstacles and constraints. The Index is a significant innovation in its field and aims to increase understanding of the connections between women's empowerment, food security, and agricultural growth. The Index is a partnership between the US Government's Feed the Future initiative, USAID, IFPRI, and OPHI of Oxford University.\"An empowered person is someone who has the power to decide -to say, if they have land, 'well, I can go farm, I can grow crops, I can plant seeds'or if they have animals, to say, 'I can sell them without going to ask permission.' This is a person who has the power to decide about their things, their life, their actions.\" In response to significant gaps and challenges in governance that came to light in 2012, the CGIAR Consortium and Fund Council jointly commissioned a review of corporate governance, to be undertaken in 2013, seizing the opportunity to strengthen management and leadership across the entire system. Improving governance is an issue of great strategic importance for CGIAR and is critical to reaping the promises of reform, a more effective and efficient system, high-quality scientific work, and CGIAR's ability to achieve impact on the ground.Poor rural communities in developing countries face mounting challenges to agricultural development and food security. Tackling these challenges requires significant resources and long-term financing for sophisticated programs. Thanks to the support and contributions from our valued investors, who share our commitment to eradicating poverty, hunger, and malnutrition, CGIAR is making progress with new initiatives and innovations for the benefit of smallholder farmers, fishers, and foresters. We are extremely grateful to all of our funders, who make this work possible, and we will continue to strive to be more efficient, collaborative, and impact-oriented so that together we can truly transform the lives of the poor. In 2012, financial support for CGIAR continued to grow at a strong rate, reflecting donors' confidence in CGIAR's ability to tackle global food-security challenges and develop a range of innovations in agriculture on behalf of the world's poorest people. Despite global economic distress, funding for CGIAR increased dramatically between 2008 and the end of 2012, from US$531 million to US$860 million (see Figure 1). With a 21% increase in funding of US$147 million, 2012 also marked the single largest annual increase in funding in CGIAR's history. This level of growth is particularly noteworthy considering the continuing fiscal difficulties experienced by many of our donors.Since 2008, total funding has increased by almost 62% (US$329 million), an average annual increase of over 15%. In the decade prior to reform (1998-2007), the average growth rate in funding was 4.8%. This growth demonstrates sustained donor confidence in and support for the reforms, including CGIAR's commitment to a resultsoriented approach to research. It also contributes to steady progress toward the goal of reaching funding of US$1 billion in 2013 in order to strengthen the portfolio of CGIAR Research Programs and further advance CGIAR's mission.The increase in overall funding is just one indicator that the reform process is bearing fruit. The growth in contributions to CGIAR's multi-donor trust fund is perhaps an even better indicator of donors' commitment to key aspects of the reform. Launched in December 2010, the CGIAR Fund was established to provide reliable and predictable multi-year funding and thereby enable research planning over the long term, resource allocation based on agreed priorities, and the timely and predictable disbursement of funds. From 2011 to 2012, contributions received through the Fund increased by 33%, growing from US$384 million to US$512 million. That, together with US$127 million carried over from 2011, resulted in a total of US$639 million available for distribution, as indicated in Table 1 below. US$458 million was disbursed during the year, so the Fund had a balance of US$181 million at the end of 2012. The high balance remained because many grants were received by the Fund late in 2012 and, consequently, could not be disbursed before the end of the year. Of the total US$458 disbursed, US$325 million was via Windows 1 and 2, and US$133 million was via Window 3.Figure 2 illustrates the monthly cash flow and Fund balance during 2012, indicating how the disbursements are affected by the pace of receipts in the Fund during the year. The Fund is able to attenuate the effects of the pattern of donor contributions, the majority of which are received in the last quarter of the year, through carrying over funds from the previous year to support funding requests during the first 6 months of the current year. \"The Netherlands has demonstrated tremendous leadership not only in making the most significant multiyear contribution to the CGIAR Fund to date, but also in choosing to provide its support in the form of unrestricted aid, evidence of the multilateral approach in action. … Contributions like this enable the CGIAR to invest in big ideas for big impact. We hope that other partners are inspired by the Netherlands' example.\" As illustrated in Figure 3, the increase in CGIAR revenue is clearly driven by the increase in contributions through the CGIAR Fund. From 2011 to 2012, the Fund's share of total CGIAR revenue grew from 28 to 41%, evidence of increasing interest in a multilateral approach to funding. In terms of untied aid, Windows 1 and 2 together accounted for 25% of total revenue in 2011 and 32% of the total in 2012, indicating slow but steady progress towards one of the important goals of reform. Personnel costs as a percentage of total CGIAR costs have decreased significantly from 43% in 2011 to 36% in 2012, while supplies and services have increased from 30 to 35%. From 2011 to 2012, partnership expenditures only increased by 1%, from 16 to 17%. However, the share of partnership expenditures relative to total costs is noticeably up from a historical average of 4%, clearly demonstrating a change in the modus operandi of CGIAR. Expenditures in 2012 are shown in Figure 5. The 2012 finances confirm strong and sustained donor commitment to the CGIAR system, with an increasing amount of funding being channeled through the Fund and targeted at CGIAR Research Programs. This increased financial commitment by investors reflects confidence in key elements of the reform, including a more efficient and effective approach to both governance and research, with a focus on results, and clear lines of accountability across the system. Through the reform process, CGIAR has embraced a new approach that is centered on innovative ways to pursue scientific work and the funding it requires. It is bringing donors together for better results and enabling scientists to concentrate more on the research through which they develop and deliver big ideas for big impact. As a result, CGIAR is well on course to reach its US$1 billion goal in 2013 and achieve greater impact in the lives of the poor in developing countries.In 2012, the Centers' total revenue was US$844.4 million, of which they implemented or spent US$833.9 million, leaving a surplus of US$11 million. A breakdown of individual Centers' surplus and deficits is shown in Table 5."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3574674946.json b/main/part_2/3574674946.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..994ca54c4d87406abf75e2a98d4704bd16f9cdcc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3574674946.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d6ae5c44fea51e2a8d576162eb69990e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/52993174-8aeb-44ad-92fd-67aff8e42815/retrieve","id":"-935493552"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"edad69ae-dd94-411f-8182-d2347e00a111","content":"Losses: When things are irreversibly lost and cannot be repaired or recovered, e.g. Loss of income, loss of food security, loss of land from rising sea levels or salination Damages: When things are damaged and require costs to repair, e.g. Boats, homes, roads, hopitals damaged by floods Economic loss and damage: Losses and damages to which a cost can be attributed, e.g. Loss of income, cost of rebuilding homes and hospitalsCommunity assets not usually associated with economic benefits, e.g. Religious or sacred sites, community support systems and social networks, mental health Rapid onset disasters: e.g. Cyclones, floods, droughts Slow onset events: e.g. Rising sea levels, desertification, salination Climate impacts that cause loss and damage Who is most harmed?• Mostly countries and communities who have done little to cause the crisis• Developing countries -mostly (but not only) small island states, least developed countries, African nations• Economies heavily dependent on agriculture• V20 analysis that climate impacts have reduced wealth by 20% over the last 20 years.• Climate impacts exacerbate existing inequalities and cast a long shadow through cuts in public services, affecting:• People living in poverty• Marginalised communities• Youth• Women and girlsWomen and girls disproportionately affected:• 80% of people displaced by climate disasters are women• Women and children 14 x as likely to die from disasters• Half (or more) of agricultural workforce in Asia + sub-Saharan Africa• Burdens: water, firewood, food production, childcare, exhaustion• Barriers: lack of access to land, literacy, services, information, support, markets, finance, decisionmaking spaces"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3578195075.json b/main/part_2/3578195075.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8928bbcd2c75fc09b731906515ba00ce1cb6fc4c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3578195075.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f2df431771b678abe29bba6bb487c90e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/0108ee7f-7e71-415f-9159-feeb4a500aa1/content","id":"-966730968"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2634890b-fd6d-43bf-8c44-5ae012657ad2","content":"Understanding yield responses to nutrient application is a key input for extension advice and strategic agricultural investments in developing countries. A commonly used model for yield responses to nutrient inputs in tropical smallholder farming systems is QUEFTS (QUantitative Evaluation of the Fertility of Tropical Soils). While QUEFTS has a strong conceptual foundation, a key assumption is that nutrients are the only limiting factors. One implication of this is the required assumption of 'perfect management'. This may be problematic in the application of QUEFTS in smallholder farming systems with a wide variety of yield limiting factors.In a previous study, QUEFTS was calibrated using farm trials in two major maize production zones in Nigeria. To reduce observed variability in correlations between estimated soil nutrient (N, P, K) supply and soil parameters (e.g. soil organic carbon, soil pH; step 1 of QUEFTS) a Mahalanobis distance method was used to remove data points not adhering to expected correlations. In this study, we assessed an alternative approach: can the QUEFTS model be adapted to fit smallholder farming systems and associated variation in management? Using 676 observations from the same nutrient omission trials in two major maize production zones in Nigeria, we compare a standard linear regression approach with a quantile regression approach to calibrate QUEFTS.We find that under the standard linear regression approach, there is a poor relation between predicted and observed yields. Using quantile regression, however, QUEFTS performed better at predicting attainable yieldsdefined as the 90th percentile of observed yieldsunder a wide variety of production conditions. Our results indicate that using quantile regression as a way to predict attainable yields, is a useful alternative implementation of QUEFTS in smallholder farming systems with high variability in management and other characteristics.With cereal yield levels around 1 t ha − 1 , crop productivity in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is low in comparison with other regions (Ehui and Pender, 2005;FAO, 2019). Current yields are only 15-27 % of the water-limited potential yield (van Ittersum et al., 2016), which is the achievable yield when water supply is the only limiting factor (Van Ittersum et al., 2013). Given the anticipated increase in population growth and food demand, significant improvements in SSA's productivity are required (van Ittersum et al., 2016). There is consensus that increased use of inorganic fertiliser inputs will be required for such productivity gains (World Bank, 2005;Holden, 2018;Sanchez, 2002;ten Berge et al., 2019;Wanzala-Mlobela et al., 2013), as current fertiliser use levels in SSA are low (Banful et al., 2010;Jayne and Rashid, 2013;Morris et al., 2007;Sheahan and Barrett, 2014) with 16.2 kg fertiliser per ha in 2016 (World Bank, 2019).Despite this consensus, increased fertiliser application does not always translate into increased yields. Responses to fertiliser application vary considerably in practice. In a meta-analysis on the agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (N-AE) of inorganic fertiliser across SSA, the average N-AE for maize was found to be 18 kg additional grain yield per kg N applied (in dry weight; Ichami et al., 2019). Variation from this average value is large with observed N-AE values in the field ranging from negative up to 50 kg grain kg N − 1 (ten Berge et al., 2019;Vanlauwe et al., 2011).The variable responses to fertiliser application in SSA are often attributed to different levels of inherent soil fertility and management (Njoroge et al., 2019(Njoroge et al., , 2017;;Ojiem et al., 2014;Vanlauwe et al., 2011;Zingore et al., 2007). For example, soils that are very low in organic matter content show a lower fertiliser response than soils with a higher organic matter content (Marenya and Barrett, 2009;Tittonell and Giller, 2013;Zingore et al., 2007). Other soil parameters found to correlate with fertiliser response are soil pH (Burke et al., 2017;Ichami et al., 2019), soil texture (Burke et al., 2017), exchangeable K and P-Olsen (Ichami et al., 2019).Site-specific fertiliser recommendations have been proposed to account for the variation in yield responses by optimizing fertiliser use based on specific soil conditions (Dobermann et al., 2002). One manner to provide such site-specific fertiliser recommendations is using fertiliser response models such as QUEFTS (QUantative Evaluation of the Fertility of Tropical Soils). The QUEFTS model predicts yield based on soil parameters and fertiliser inputs (Janssen et al., 1990;Smaling and Janssen, 1993). In QUEFTS, a number of equations link soil parameters to soil nutrient (N, P, K) supply, fertiliser recovery, nutrient uptake and grain yields (Fig. 1). In step 1, soil parameters (soil organic matter, pH, percentage clay, P-Olsen and K exch ) are linked to potential soil supply of N, P and K (Janssen et al., 1990;Smaling and Janssen, 1993). In steps 2-4, nutrient uptake and yield are estimated based on the calculated soil supply of N, P and K in step 1 and fertiliser application.The strength of QUEFTS lies in the manner in which it treats the response of the three macronutrients N, P and K: separately vis-à-vis their interactions. This enables the identification of locally optimal combinations of N, P and K fertiliser application rates. The QUEFTS model has gained widespread use within the scientific and agricultural community, mainly due to the limited amount of required input data (i. e., soil properties, fertiliser application rate and potential yield) and relative ease of use. With new geospatial data tools and larger access to open data, there is an increased demand for fertiliser response maps, based on models such as QUEFTS.The weakness of QUEFTS also lies within its design: QUEFTS predicts yields based on soil conditions and fertiliser application, under the condition that there are no other yield limiting factors (such as late planting, seed quality issues, occurrence of weeds, pests and diseases or issues such as soil compaction). In practice, especially in tropical smallholder farming systems, these limitations are widespread, even in researcher-managed or on-farm field trials. In Shehu et al. (2019), such yield data, limited by other factors than nutrients, was used to calibrate QUEFTS. To accommodate calibration, an outlier selection was performed based on expected correlations between soil characteristics and soil nutrient supply. We see two limitations of this approach: 1) Data point removal is based on hypothesized correlations (correlations which are then used in QUEFTS); and 2) variation in yield responses that smallholder farmers experience might be reduced.To circumvent these two limitations, in this study we recalibrated and validated QUEFTS using the same TAMASA nutrient omission trial (NOT) dataset for Nigeria while basing the outlier selection only on observed extremities in plant parameters and compared results with the Shehu et al. (2019) calibration. In addition, we used a quantile regression as an alternative approach to calibrate QUEFTS and predict attainable yields.The following sections concisely describe the QUEFTS model (Fig. 1), for a more elaborate explanation readers are referred to Janssen et al. (1990) and Smaling and Janssen (1993).In the first step of the QUEFTS model, soil nutrient supply of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) is calculated using four soil parameters: pH, soil OC, P-Olsen, and exchangeable K. Additional to the nutrient supply from the soil, nutrient supply from fertiliser application is calculated by adding a term that calculates the fertiliser recovery of applied fertilisers. Based on a number of trials in Kenya and Suriname, Janssen et al. (1990) Where S N , S P and S K , are the soil nutrient supply of N, P and K in kg ha − 1 ; fN, fP, fK, are the pH correction factors of N, P and K supply, respectively (-); I N , I P , I K , are the nutrient inputs of N, P and K in terms of fertiliser application in kg ha − 1 ; R N , R P , R K , are the maximum recovery fractions for fertiliser N, P and K (-); orgC is soil OC in g kg − 1 ; P-Olsen is soil P-Olsen in mg kg − 1 ; K Exch is soil exchangeable K in mmol kg − 1 ; pH is soil pH.Eqs. 1-3 are used to calculate the soil nutrient supply and Eqs. 4-6 express the pH correction factors for Eqs. 1-3, respectively. The equations calibrated by Janssen et al. (1990) apply to soils with a pH from 4.5 to 7 and a maximum soil OC, P-Olsen and exchangeable K below 70 g kg − 1 , 30 mg kg − 1 and 30 mmol kg − 1 , respectively. Smaling and Janssen (1993) recalibrated QUEFTS using different parameters in the equations for nutrient supply prediction. N supply was predicted based on the organic soil N, temperature and clay percentage. P supply was predicted based on total P, soil OC and pH. K supply was predicted based on exchangeable K and soil OC.Step 2 of QUEFTS quantifies the relation between potential soil nutrient supply and actual N, P and K uptake. QUEFTS assumes that the uptake of one nutrient is limited by the uptake of another nutrient. In the case of N, N uptake is limited by P uptake and by K uptake. This results in two N uptake estimates, namely one for the nutrient combination NP and one for the nutrient combination NK. In confirmation with the law of the minimum, QUEFTS takes the lowest of the two N uptake estimates for further calculations. P and K uptake are calculated in the same way (Janssen et al., 1990).For the calculation of nutrient uptake, three defining curves can be described on the relation between the potential supply of a given nutrient and the actual uptake of the given nutrient (I,II and III). Here we explain these for N, but it equally applies to P and K. In curve I, potential N supply is relatively low compared to potential supply of P or K. As a result, N will be diluted to the maximum in the crop. In this situation, potential N supply is assumed to be equal to the actual N uptake (U N = S N ; Sattari et al., 2014). In curve III potential N supply is relatively high compared to the potential supply of P or K. N uptake will be limited by the amount of P or K taken up (U P = S P ; U K = S K ). In this situation, N will be accumulated to the maximum. Curve II is an integration of a regression between the extremes of curves I and III.In step 3 of QUEFTS, nutrient uptake is converted into maize yield. For each nutrient (N,P,K) a yield estimate is calculated for maximum accumulation and dilution of that nutrient within the crop. This results in 6 yield estimates. It is important that the yield range of a certain nutrient combination does not exceed the maximum yield given the uptake of the third nutrient and that the estimated yield remains lower than the potential yield for a given site. The potential yield should thus be estimated prior to running the QUEFTS model. For this study we assumed a potential yield of 10 t ha − 1 , based on mean annual precipitation (Shehu et al., 2019). Lastly, the minimum requirement for establishing maize yield is an uptake of 5 kg N ha − 1 , 0.4 kg P ha − 1 and kg K ha − 1 , as lower uptake of nutrients will not result in any yield. The boundary lines for a minimum and maximum yield for a given nutrient uptake estimated in this step are crop dependent (Antwi et al., 2017;Janssen et al., 1990;Setiyono et al., 2010;Shehu et al., 2019;Smaling and Janssen, 1993).In step 4 of QUEFTS, the final step, one yield estimate is predicted by averaging the 6 yield estimates calculated in step 3 (section 2.1.3).Our study area covers the main maize producing areas of northern Nigeria − Kano, Kaduna and Katsina states − which together are characterized by two agroecological zones (AEZs), the Sudan Savanna (SS) and the Northern Guinea Savanna (NGS) (Fig. 2). SS has a drier climate and received 600− 800 mm of rain annually in 2015 and 2016. Precipitation in NGS was 900− 1500 mm annually in 2015 and 2016. In both AEZs the rainy season lasts from May to September. May and October are the hottest months with a maximum temperature between 35 and • C and a minimum temperature between 20 and 25 • C. January and August are the coldest months with a maximum temperature around 30-35 • C and a minimum temperature around 15 • C. Soils in the area are haplic Acrisols, haplic Luvisols and haplic Vertisols (ISRIC, 2018). For a more detailed description of the study area the reader is referred to Shehu et al. (2018).The data set for this study was obtained from NOTs conducted in and 103 fields in the 2015 and 2016 rainy seasons, respectively (Fig. 2). In 2015 the fields were located in 10 different districts, while in fields were spread over 14 different districts. The sampling frame was designed to be representative of the variation in soils and other biophysical production characteristics across the area of interest, including soils and agroecological variation.In each field, NOTs were installed with six different treatments. The treatments included a control treatment where no nutrients were applied to the soil, treatments where PK, NK and NP were applied and thus respectively N, P and K were omitted, a NPK treatment with all nutrients applied and a NPK + micronutrients treatment where NPK and micronutrients (S, Ca, Mg, Zn & B) were added to the soil. Yield data from the NPK + micronutrients treatment was not used in this study. In NGS, N was applied at a rate of 140 kg ha − 1 applied in three equal split applications at planting, 21 and 42 days after emergence. In SS, N was applied in three equal split applications at a rate of 120 kg ha − 1 . P and K were applied at planting at a rate of 50 kg ha − 1 in NGS and 40 kg ha − 1 in SS. Fertiliser treatments were sufficient to reach a potential maize yield of 10 t ha − 1 in NGS and 8 t ha − 1 in SS.Plots in the research-managed trial sites had a size of 5 * 6 m and were prepared by mechanical tillage before planting. Planting was done with a spacing of 0.75 m in the inter-row and 0.25 m in the row resulting in a plant density of 53,333 plants ha − 1 after thinning. Manual weeding was done at least twice during the season. At each location an open pollinated maize (OPV) variety and a hybrid variety were planted, resulting in 12 treatments in total at each trial site. The OPV variety used in NGS and SS matures in 105-110 days and 90-95 days respectively. For hybrids the same variety was used in NGS and SS but differed for 2015 and 2016. The variety used in 2015 matures in 105-110 days and the variety used in 2016 matures in 105-118 days.In every site four soil samples were taken from the 0− 20 cm upper soil layer before fertilisers were applied. Soil samples were taken in a zig-zag pattern and thoroughly mixed to create one mixed soil sample and thus one soil measurement per farm. Soil analyses were carried out in the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) lab in Nigeria. Soil organic carbon was measured with a modified Walkley and Black method (Heanes, 1984). Total nitrogen was assessed with the micro-Kjeldahl digestion method (Bremner, 1996) and the concentration was measured colorimetrically using N-autoanalyzer (Technicon autoanalyzer II, SEAL Analytical Inc, Mequon, WI, USA). Available phosphorus, available sulphur, exchangeable cations (K, Ca, Mg, and Na) and micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Cu, Mn and B) were assessed with the Mehlich-3 extraction procedure (Mehlich, 1984). A glass electrode pH meter was used to measure soil pH in a soil: water ratio of 1:1. The method by Gee and Or (2002) was used to assess the particle size distribution. For descriptive statistics of soil parameters readers are referred to (Shehu et al., 2018(Shehu et al., , 2019)).From each 5 * 6 m plot, the middle 3 * 3 m maize was harvested at physiological maturity for crop cut measurements. Plant density, cob count, total cob weight and stover fresh weight were recorded. Shelling percentage and grain moisture content were measured from a smaller set of randomly selected cobs (5 in 2015 and 10 in 2016) to calculate dry grain weight from the total fresh cob weight. Grain yield was expressed in 15 % moisture content. From the stover, five stalks were randomly selected and oven-dried to constant weight at 60 • C to measure moisture content. In 2015, this procedure did not go as planned. From the correctly measured stalks an average moisture content of 52 % was used to convert stover weight into dry weight. The dried grain and stover samples were also used to assess N, P and K content in the grain and stalks. Nitrogen (N) content was digested using micro-Kjeldahl digestion method (Bremner, 1996) and the concentration determined colorimetrically using autoanalyzer (Technicon autoanalyzer II, SEAL Analytical Inc, Mequon, WI, USA). P and K concentrations were measured with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Optima 80, Winlab 5.5, PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) after digestion with nitric acid (HNO 3 ). Shehu et al (2019) The total Nigeria TAMASA NOT data set contained 1825 observations. Of these, 455 observations contained missing values in at least one of the measured parameters and were omitted from analysis in the previous study by Shehu et al. (2019) as well as in our study.Following, in Shehu et al. (2019) a Mahalanobis Distance outlier selection was performed on the whole dataset to discard multivariate outliers (n = 219) and separately again for the calibration of each supply function for N, P and K (n = 216). Hence, in total 434 data points out of 1370 observations were removed from the analysis in Shehu et al. (2019). A Mahalanobis Distance outlier selection can be used to filter out unusual combinations of variables. Such a combination could for instance be a field with a high amount of available P in the soil and a very low yield. However, QUEFTS also uses available P as one of the variables used to predict yield. In this case, the outlier selection influences the equation that is to be calibrated or parameterized. Moreover, the observed variation in expected correlations between soil characteristics and nutrient supply might have valid reasons, such as heterogeneity in management of the farmers' fields.As an alternative approach, in our study, outliers were only removed based on extremities observed in plant parameters that could potentially influence observed relations strongly. Plant parameter observations were removed based on standardized residual values of a linear mixed effects model larger than -4 or 4 (n = 52) (an approach similar to Ronner et al. ( 2016)). For the soil parameters there was no reason to assume any incorrect measurements. In total 1318 observations were left for data analysis.For calibration purposes, trial sites were selected where within the same field and for one variety, yield and soil data was available for the four treatments with nutrient application (PK, NK, NP and NPK treatment) (n = 676). A total of 169 complete trials (field * variety) were found and included in the calibration exercise. Of these 169 complete trials, 84 were from OPV and 85 from hybrids. Eleven fields were located in SS and 158 fields in NGS. Forty complete trials were from 2015 and 129 from 2016. The other data points were used for validation. Of those 676 osbervations used for calibration, d data from the control plots (n = 154) wereere not used for calibration and were excluded from the analysis.No distinction was made between OPV and hybrid as the varieties responded similarly to nutrient application and had a similar harvest index (Shehu et al., 2018(Shehu et al., , 2019)). Data from the two different years were pooled for analysis. The fields measured in 2016 were different from those measured in 2015 and it was thus not possible to form a panel. In the analysis of soil nutrient supply against soil parameters (step 1 of QUEFTS) no distinction was made for AEZ. The main reason for this was that ideally one model calibration should be made for the whole dataset. A practical reason was that few data points from SS remained after data preparation.For running QUEFTS with Janssen et al. (1990) parameters, P-Olsen is needed. In this study P-Mehlich was measured. P-Olsen was approximated by dividing P-Mehlich values by three (Onduru and Du Preez, 2007).First, soil nutrient supply of N, P and K and recovery of applied N, P and K were estimated for each trial location (Sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.2). Then, two different methods were used to calibrate the first step of QUEFTS: (1) Nutrient supply was correlated to soil parameters using standard linear regression, a standard procedure to calibrate QUEFTS; and (2) boundary lines of nutrient supply were correlated to soil parameters using quantile regression, as an alternative approach to calibrate QUEFTS (Sections 2.3.3 and 2.3.4). We used quantile regression instead of the upper limits of the prediction intervals resulting from the standard linear regression, because the slopes of the quantile regression lines behaved differently than the slopes of the standard linear regression. Hence, quantile regression resulted in the best regression estimates for the best performing fields.Based on significant correlations found in the mentioned analyses, two sets of soil supply functions were computed. One set of functions was computed for the calibration with standard linear regression and one set of functions for the calibration using quantile regression. Finally, for both methods Step 2-4 of the QUEFTS model were followed to complete the model calibration (Section 2.3.5).For both methods, potential soil nutrient supply was derived from the measured nutrient uptake in the treatment where that specific nutrient was omitted. As such, it was assumed that the potential soil N supply was equal to the measured N uptake by the plants in the PK treatment. Similarly, the supply of P and K were derived from the measured P and K uptake in the NK and NP treatment respectively. Hereby we assumed that the availability of the two applied nutrients was high enough to ensure that the omitted nutrient was limiting and uptake was thus maximal. In the following sections we will use the term apparent nutrient supply to indicate that we used measured nutrient uptake as an estimate of the nutrient supply of the soil.In some cases, nutrient uptake in the nutrient omitted treatment plot was lower than nutrient uptake in the corresponding control plot. These cases were not excluded from the analysis as this was assumed to be due to random errors. We assume that these random errors exist in all fields. Therefore, removing only the cases where nutrient uptake in the nutrient omitted treatment plot is lower than in the control plot would lead to a positive uptake bias.In this study, nutrient recovery of applied fertilisers (N, P or K) was calculated as the difference in nutrient uptake between a plot receiving NPK and a plot where the specific nutrient was omitted, divided by the amount of the given nutrient applied in the NPK treatment (Eq. 7). For example, for N, this means the difference in N uptake between a plot receiving NPK and a plot receiving PK, divided by the amount of N applied. Similarly, P and K recovery of applied fertilisers were calculated from the difference in nutrient uptake between the NPK and NK and NPK and NP treatment, respectively.Where R i is the recovery fraction of nutrient i (N, P or K) (-); U i NPK is the uptake of nutrient i in the NPK treatment in kg ha − 1 ; U i j is the uptake of nutrient i in the omission treatment j (PK, NK or NP) in kg ha − 1 ; I i is the nutrient input rate of nutrient i in kg ha − 1 .First, apparent nutrient supply and recovery fractions of N, P and K were plotted against different soil parameters to visually check and understand the correlations between apparent nutrient supply or recovery and soil parameters. A linear mixed effects model (Eq. 8) was used to test whether relations were significant. Correlations were considered significant at p < 0.05. Year and district were added as random variables, whereby districts were nested within years. Analysis was performed with the 'nlme' package in R version 3.4.3.Where S i is the apparent nutrient supply, of nutrient i in kg ha − 1 ; where soil property ij is one or more of the measured soil properties j used to estimate the apparent supply of nutrient i.Initially, recovery fractions of N, P and K were related against soil parameters, but no significant relations were found (data not shown). Therefore, only average recovery fractions of N, P and K were computed with a linear mixed effects model. (Eq. 9).2.3.4. Adapting QUEFTS: relating nutrient supply to soil parameters using quantile regression Given the heterogeneity in management of smallholder farmers, chances are high that the assumption of no yield limiting factors other than nutrient limitation was violated in farmers' fields. As an alternative option, a quantile regression was performed to estimate boundary lines of maximum potential soil supply of N, P and K for given levels of soil parameters. The 'quantreg' package in R version 3.4.3 was used to draw boundary lines through the 90 th percentile. The quantile regressions were also run for different quantiles to check if slopes changed for different quantiles. For N and K this was not the case. For P there were two points having a large influence on the shape of the curve. These two points were therefore not taken into account in the boundary analysis. ANOVA was used to test significance of the quantile regression lines. Average recovery fractions of N, P and K applied were estimated using standard linear regression.For QUEFTS calibration, the relationships between potential nutrient supply and soil parameters in a specific region needs to be quantified (step 1). Step 2 to 4 are mainly plant dependent and often do not need further calibration. Therefore, the parameters as described by Shehu et al. (2019) were used for step 2 to 4. The calibration parameters adopted from Shehu at al. (2019) include the boundary lines of physiological or internal efficiency in kg grain kg − 1 nutrient of 32 and 79 for N, 164 and 528 for P, and 24 and 136 for K. Maximum attainable yield was set at 10 t ha − 1 for NGS and 8 t ha − 1 for SS.Validation data (n = 488) was taken from all fields where one or more values were missing. This provided sufficient data to validate the recalibrated versions of the QUEFTS model. QUEFTS was run with soil data and yield data using four sets of step 1 equations: (1) the original QUEFTS equations (Janssen et al., 1990); (2) equations previously calibrated on the Nigeria NOT data using standard linear regression (Shehu et al., 2019); (3) equations calibrated on the Nigeria NOT data using standard linear regression in this study; (4) equations calibrated on the Nigeria NOT data using quantile regression. Equation set 2 was found by using a Mahalanobis Distance outlier selection method. Equation sets 3 and 4 were found using an outlier removal based on plant parameters. Following, yield estimates were compared with observed yields for each location.Models based on standard linear regression (sets 1-3) were compared for best fit with the root mean square error (RMSE, calculated as the square root of the mean squared difference between observed and predicted values). The model based on equation set 4 was considered valid if the predicted boundary yield line was similar to the measured yield for the 0.9 quantile. It was not possible to use any direct measure to compare the models based on sets 1-3 to the model based on set 4 because they are calibrated in different ways.Observed and predicted boundary lines are indicative of maximum yield, but do not provide insights into observed variation. Therefore, we attempted to explain part of the variation in yield below the observed and predicted boundary line, using supplemental data. In both years, plant density at harvest was measured. It was evaluated whether plant density, as a proxy for suboptimal management, could be used to explain part of the yield variation.In the original QUEFTS equations, calibrated on field data from Kenya (Janssen et al., 1990), soil N supply is linearly correlated with soil OC and soil pH (Eq. 1). Alternatively, our data analysis showed no significant correlation between either soil OC or soil pH and apparent N supply (Fig. 3A and B). In our study, there was a significant correlation between silt + clay content and apparent N supply (slope = 0.55, p = The range in apparent N supply was however very large (Fig. 3C).For soil P supply, the original QUEFTS equations assume a linear correlation between soil P supply and soil OC and P-Olsen. Additionally, a pH correction factor with a parabolic optimum around a pH of 6 is used in the original QUEFTS equations to predict soil P supply. In this study, no correlation was observed between soil OC and apparent soil P supply (Fig. 4A). Based on our field data, a significant correlation was found between soil available P and apparent soil P supply, being dependent on the clay content of a soil (U P ~ clay content + soil P-Meh, random = 1 | year / district; Fig. 4B).Based on our field data, no significant correlations were found between apparent soil K supply and soil OC, soil pH or soil exchangeable K which are all considered in the original QUEFTS model (Fig. 5). For additional figures on apparent nutrient supply and soil parameters, readers are referred to appendix A.The average recovery fractions for N, P and K were 0.39, 0.13 and 0.14 (Fig. 6). The lowest observed N recovery was -0.3 and the highest N recovery was 1.2. Except for some outliers, P recovery ranged from -0.2 to 0.4 and the range for K recovery was from -2 to 2. Variation in nutrient recovery was clearly present. No significant correlations were observed between soil parameters (soil OC, soil texture, soil pH, soil N, soil P and soil exchangeable K) and nutrient recovery (data not shown).Based on significant correlations between apparent nutrient supply and soil properties with the mixed effects models, nutrient supply pre-diction equations were developed (Eqs. 10-12). Since for K no significant correlations were found, the average measured apparent K supply was used. A nutrient recovery term was added to all the three equations according to the QUEFTS model principle as earlier described, based on the average nutrient recovery fraction.S N = 24.2 + 0.55*(clayS p = 14.1 − 0.28*clay content + 0.23*P-Meh + I P *0.13 ( 11)3.2. Calibration of QUEFTS step 1 using quantile regressionThe boundary analysis for the 0.9 quantile showed that maximum apparent N supply increased with silt + clay content (y = 0.72 x + 51.9; Fig. 3C).When the quantile regression was performed for all data on apparent P supply and soil pH, a parabolic boundary line was found with a minimum apparent P supply with a pH less than 5 and a maximum around a pH of 7 (Fig. 4C). This relation was however counterintuitive and dependent on two outliers (Fig. 4C; two observations in the top right corner). When these two outliers were excluded, a quadratic boundary line was found with an optimum around a pH of 6 (y = -9.57 x 2 + 113.4 x -314.7). Therefore, this equation was used in the boundary model of QUEFTS. Additionally, quantile regression for the 0.9 quantile showed that maximum apparent P supply decreased with an increasing soil clay content (Fig. 4B) (-0.65 * clay content + 34.89). For the estimation of apparent P supply, it was assumed that the lowest values of the two equations was equal to the maximum apparent P supply.Quantile regression showed that the maximum apparent K supply decreased with increasing soil OC (y = -5.5 x + 197), which is in line with the original QUEFTS assumption that K supply decreases with diminishing soil OC (Fig. 5B).No correlations were found between soil properties and maximum nutrient recovery using quantile regressions as was the case using method 1. Therefore, in method 2 a similar constant average fertiliser recovery rate was assumed regardless of soil properties.Based on the boundary lines, boundary equations were formulated that predicted maximum apparent nutrient supply . Similar to the standard linear regression equations a nutrient recovery term was added based on the average nutrient recovery fraction. None of the QUEFTS models in which step 1 was calibrated using standard linear regression showed good correlations between predicted and observed yields when validated with an independent data set (Fig. 7A,B,C). Between them, the newly found equations predicted yields relatively better, followed by the original QUEFTS equations and the version from Shehu et al. (2019) performed worst, albeit with small differences among them (RMSE 2.06, 2.52 and 2.94 respectively). In all three cases the regression line deviated substantially from the 1:1 line.The QUEFTS boundary model predicts the boundary or attainable yield (90 th percentile), shown as the red 1:1 line in Fig. 8. The observed 90 th percentile yield line (upper dotted line, Fig. 8) was very similar to the predicted 90 th percentile yield. This shows that the boundary line model was able to predict maximum yield accurately. The 50 th percentile showed that the median yield for farmers is more or less three tonnes per hectare less than the attainable yield, indicating a large range in yield responses under similar soil conditions where the measured biophysical soil factors alone were not able to explain yield variation. With biophysical factors, we specifically refer to the variables either tested for or included in the calibrated QUEFTS model (i.e., soil carbon, clay and silt content, soil pH, soil available P and soil exchangeable K) and potential water limited crop yields (which are dependent on climate).Considering the range of relevant biophysical factors included and the in-field observations on variations in management, we thus observe two types of variation in the analysis of yield responses: (1) variation on the x-axis which is defined by biophysical factors and (2) variation on the y-axis which is determined by farmer management (Fig. 8). Using plant density as an explanatory factor showed that most fields with plant densities lower than 60 % had yields below the 50 th percentile. Although plant density is only a single parameter on management, we derive that management related factors played a large role in the observed variation in yield response to fertiliser application and soil characteristics. For the relation between yield and plant density at harvest readers are referred to Appendix C.Our study indicates that under conditions of highly variable management (which are typical in tropical smallholder farming systems), QUEFTS may be most valuable as a predictor of attainable yield rather than average yield. We assume that the data used in this study -1318 observations from farmer-managed NOTs in northern Nigeriaare representative of the empirical variability in yield response to nutrient management within smallholder systems of the region (e.g. Njoroge et al., 2019Njoroge et al., , 2017;;Ojiem et al., 2014;Vanlauwe et al., 2011;Zingore et al., 2007). In this sense, our results are relevant for QUEFTS-based analysis elsewhere in Africa and other developing regions.More concretely, we show thatunder variable agronomic management conditionsthe current standard approach for training or calibrating QUEFTS, involving standard linear regression of conditional mean yield responses, is inferior to calibration approaches based on quantile regression of conditional responses at the 90 th percentile, which we use as a measure of attainable yield. A likely explanation is the underlying QUEFTS assumption on no other yield limiting factors than nutrients (Smaling and Janssen, 1993). This assumption is most likely at odds with the variability of plot-level conditions in SSA. Smallholder farming systems in Nigeria (and elsewhere) are characterized by a multitude of non-nutrient yield limiting factors, including pests, diseases, micro-climatic variability, and idiosyncratic management factors. Using planting density as an explanatory variable, part of the variation in observed yields for similar biophysical conditions could be explained. Causes of varying plant densities were not recorded for each field, but were, amongst other factors, caused by poor thinning, poor emergence due to drought and destruction by termites and other pests. Data validation approaches which ignore such non-nutrient yield limiting factors as sources of variability will be fundamentally challenged in predicting yield responses. We therefore argue that predicting attainable yields makes more sense than predicting yields in such conditions.For practical applications, we present an alternative approach to empirically calibrating QUEFTS, using quantile regression. This method gives relatively robust predictions of attainable yields (90 th percentile yields), after controlling for other biophysical factors. This makes intuitive sense, as the attainable yield conceptually corresponds to the yield one would attain after addressing other limiting factors. Additionally, this method can also be used to predict median yields (as shown in Fig. 8) or other percentiles, such as the 50 th percentile. These, in combination with attainable yields, can provide a farmer with a realistic range of yield responses to nutrients applied considering other yield limiting factors in addition to soil nutrients.Our findings are in contrast with results from (Shehu et al., 2019) based on the same data set. Shehu et al. (2019) found a good correlation between observed yields and predicted QUEFTS grain yields using standard linear regression for estimating indigenous soil nutrient's supply. However, in their analysis a Mahalanobis Distance outlier selection method was used to remove multivariate outliers (n = 434), aiming to reduce the variability in yield responses to soil parameters. Our study, in contrast, selects outliers based on observed extremities in plant parameters, taking the standardized residual size of a linear mixed model on plant parameters as a criterion (n = 52). In the latter case, fewer outliers are removed and more of the observed variation of yield responses remained in the dataset. More importantly, in this manner, no data is removed based on expected relationships between yield responses and co-variables.Other studies found similar challenges in explaining yield variability when only biophysical conditions were taken into account. For example, Ichami et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis using 71 studies aiming to identify factors that could help to adjust fertiliser recommendation to the biophysical environment. They concluded that in SSA soil pH, exchangeable K and soil texture together explained less than 33 % of the variation in fertiliser recovery. In Kenya, Njoroge et al. (2017) found strong spatial patterns for yield responses to N, P and K fertilizers. Six different clusters were identified with different types of responses. Between these clusters however, no differences in mean soil properties were observed. In an additional analysis, yield response variation was partly attributed due to difference in historical manure management (Njoroge et al., 2019).In the experimental set-up, a number of limitations occurred which could be improved in further studies. First, only one fertiliser rate was used in the field experiments, likely affecting the observed recovery as this depends partly on the level of nutrients applied (Zingore et al., 2007). Using a number of nutrient application levels, our recovery fractions could be validated for a wider range. This is especially relevant when considering current farming practices as fertiliser rates generally applied by farmers are lower than the amount of nutrients applied in our study (Liverpool-Tasie et al., 2017). Second, the experiments were conducted in two seasons, while a wider range of weather conditions could have assured a wider application of the boundary line model (Shepherd et al., 2018). This will be more important in very wet or very dry years as the conducted trials took place in relatively normal years, while potential crop yields might be strongly reduced in very dry years. Lastly, while unavoidable to the large scale of the study, multiple enumerators were used, potentially adding to the observed variation in fertiliser response (Vanlauwe et al., 2016).This study has been the first to estimate attainable maize yields based on biophysical factors such as soil OC, clay content, silt content and soil pH (Fig. 8). Even though attainable yields were predicted reasonably well based on biophysical factors, only partial explanation has been given for the causes in the variation of the remaining yield responses, as we were only able to include plant density as a factor in our analysis. This calls for further research into predicting crop yields under different limiting conditions. Other management factors could include sowing dates (Laux et al., 2010), weed and pest management or historic field management. If the previous season included manure use or cultivation of legumes, maize yields could have benefited from residual nutrient effects (Franke et al., 2018;Njoroge et al., 2019).One among many reasons proposed for the low levels of fertiliser usage in sub-Saharan Africa is the poor tailoring of fertiliser recommendations, which are agronomically and/or economically suboptimal. Raising fertiliser usage in the region will require, in part, better fertiliser recommendations which, in turn, will require more accurate assessments of likely yield responses in different locations and management contexts. The large uncertainty and variation in yield estimates observed in this study call for modest claims on potential for calibration and validation of yield response models such as QUEFTS, if only biophysical data is available.We show that, instead of predicting an expected response to a given fertiliser application in a certain field, an upper bound can be given of attainable yield, if farmers do everything else right in terms of other management. This latter option is a more cautious and sensible approach. Predicting attainable yields only, given certain soil conditions and fertiliser application, acknowledges the large variability observed in the field. However, this approach could easily be extended to predictions of yield responses at different levelse.g. the 25 th , 50 th or 75 th percentile of the yield distributionwhich may correspond to differing levels of farming ability and/or resource endowments that constrain management decisions. This opens up a flexible framework for generating context-specific fertiliser recommendations, compared to those which assume 'perfect management' and no limiting factors other than nutrient supply. Our proposed methodology may therefore support improvement of scenario analyses, foresight studies or economic cost benefit analyses on nutrient management in tropical smallholder farming systems. In the current era of rapidly emerging opportunities for digital agriculture in developing regions, the scope for improved fertiliser application recommendations to have impact at scale is increasing. Providing more realistic recommendations will enhance the return on investments for all stakeholders involved, especially in the long run.The data used in this analysis are freely available from CIMMYT's Dataverse repository (https://data.cimmyt.org), or upon request from the authors. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3579998110.json b/main/part_2/3579998110.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a73aceb75d08d9945af1bcfab2112a506e2cabb --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3579998110.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8f7a8d6be8264b16341e460d90263d54","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a6f7ee31-06bf-42e9-b536-740b66eaf019/retrieve","id":"456808172"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"bb3eff80-d1b4-49a7-9617-581c57d33581","content":"India (ICAR) and Turkey (TAGEM), via allocations dedicated to partnerships under WHEAT. Bilateral funders supported programs and projects matched to WHEAT Flagship Projects (FPs) and Clusters of Activity (CoAs) with ca. $29. million. 2021 bilateral funder support will be documented in the WHEAT Annual Financial Report and in the CGIAR Financial Dashboards.Staple cereals will continue to play a critical role in global efforts towards food security, contributing nearly half of both daily calories and protein intake in low-and middle-income countries. In wheat and maize value chains in Africa and Asia, the stability and utilization dimension of food security merits increased research attention. Considerable benefits in yields and sustainability were found in integrated systems in sub-Saharan Africa, where maize, wheat, livestock production and agro-forestry were practiced together -see Table 10 (4430). In related, CRPindependent research, scientists found that the diffusion of modern crop varieties during the Green Revolution reduced infant mortality by 2.4-5.3% -implying significant health benefits from increases in agricultural productivity and improved varieties.Better estimates of the number and distribution of crop-specific farms will lay the foundation for agricultural policy and R&D efforts in the Global South. A fifth of all farms globally grew wheat in 2020, a number expected to decrease by 4% in 2030. Wheat is cultivated on 216 M ha (2020); 29% of which is in lower-and lower-middle income countries (L/LMICs). Compared to high-income countries (HICs), LICs have more than four times the number of farms, ten times the rural population, half the agricultural area and a tenth of the average farm size. Farms remain the foundation for much of the rural populace in L/LMICs-see Table 10 (4432).Climate change will decrease global wheat production by −1.9% by mid-century; the most negative impacts are projected to affect developing countries in tropical regions. Models suggest large, negative yield impacts for African (-15% by 2050) and Southern Asian countries (-16% by 2050), where food security is already a problem. Introducing new, climate change-tolerant crop genetic traits as an adaptation response to climate change would improve wheat yield in many regions. One hopeful sign is that breeding research continues to deliver increased grain yields despite climate warming-See Table 10,(4338) and FP3. Innovations in modeling for resource-constrained scenarios will help to maintain breeding breakthroughs -see Table 10,(4341) and FP3.However, due to poor soils and nutrient management, many developing countries will only successfully climate-adapt if more nitrogen fertilizer were deployed-see Table 10 (4326). In 2021, WHEAT co-funded 'A \"more ammonium solution\" to mitigate nitrogen pollution and boost crop yields,' which points to Biological Nitrification Inhibition to foster soils with a more even mix of nitrogen sources, including the less-chemically-reactive compound, ammonium.Scientists investigated dietary adaptation mechanisms to climate change-driven impacts on nutrient levels in staple grains, which might drive mineral deficiencies amongst at-risk populations. By pairing nutritional, dietary health analyses, researchers found that replacing refined grains with whole grains could help compensate for climate change-related reductions in iron and zinc concentrations in wheat, rice and maize. Additionally, it could improve fiber intake, protein deficiencies, and reduce mortality from chronic disease. Researchers recommend a timestaggered approach: in the short-term, increase the ratio of whole grains to refined grains in diets; in the medium-to long-term, improve healthiness and sustainability of diets -see Table 10 (4420) and Innovation #2597.WHEAT researchers collaborated with the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH)-led COVID-19 Hub to publish a descriptive analysis of the most critical, immediate effects of COVID-19 for different kinds of agricultural systems and their associated value chains in Central America and Mexico. A similar analysis in South Asia showed that Asian farming and food systems were moderately resilient, reinforced by government policies that prioritized food availability and affordability. Rural livelihoods and food security suffered from disruptions to local labor markets (especially for off-farm work), farm produce markets (notably for perishable foods) and input supply chains (i.e. seeds and fertilizers).Farmer uptake-impacts of conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification. At least 73% of adoption levels achieved in Phase II can be attributed to the Enhancing Food Security in the Arab Countries (EFSAC) project, implying adoption on 17.7% (231,000 ha) of the total 1.3M ha of wheat areas in intervention regions. 154,000 -183,000 households (0.89 -1.06 million people) directly benefited from average yield gains of 436 kg/ha. EFSAC contributed to greater domestic production in five countries by 79 -474,000 tons, valued at US$ 19.7-118 million (depending on the country). Researchers learned that once farmers decide to use the Happy Seeder (HS) in irrigated wheat systems of Indo-Gangetic plain, the practice is used on the entire wheat area by 89% of adopters. On average, adopting households applied zero-till technologies to more than 90% of their total wheat area in the 2017/18 rabi (winter) season, with use-intensities particularly high among adopters in the smallest-and middle-landholding groups -see SLO 1.2.Breeding research-based impacts. Within 6 years, HarvestPlus-led scaling efforts have reached 1.4 million Pakistani households with high zinc wheat on the basis of CGIAR-derived varieties. NARS scientists estimated the return on wheat research in Nepal over the last 19 years: 91% internal rate of return (IRR). Of all major crops grown in Nepal, wheat productivity growth was greatest (1990-2019; 2.61%). In Bangladesh, DNA fingerprinting analysis showed that in farmers' fields, 68% of grain samples were varieties released after 2000, but also wheat blast-susceptible. Varieties released in the past 5 years, including BARIGom33 (2017; wheat blast-resistant) were detected in 4% or less of field samples, translating into roughly 7.3% of Bangladesh's 340,000 ha wheat area. Despite institutional challenges, wheat research in Morocco has paid off. Considering all costs and benefits of wheat research investment in Morocco (using 2002Morocco (using -2014 data) data), scientists estimated a conservative benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 19.64 with 623,000 tons (14.8%) of additional wheat supply valued at US$355 million p.a. -see Table 1, SLO 1. 1, 2.1 & 2.3.MasAgro had operated 12 hubs in Mexico, incorporating 68 distributed research platforms. Technologies improving the sustainability of maize-or wheat-based field practices were adopted on 159,944 ha and monitored through a robust data collection system. In 2018, farmers filled 66,384 field logbooks, resulting in a cumulative 221,961 records since 2012. In side-by-side, multi-year comparisons of technologies, wheat yields were 20% higher than control yields, and average wheat profits were 24% higher. Considering future adoption pathways, a 2021 case study (Guanajuato, Mexico) argued for disaggregating conservation agriculture into smaller component packages that could increase farmer adoption in risky contexts -see Table 1, SLO1.2.WHEAT and partner scientists made progress on genetic gains, wheat blast-resistant wheat, seed systems and climate-smart agronomic practices, and further developed innovation pathways for scale-appropriate innovation. Both MAIZE and WHEAT, together with CCAFS, can point to further learnings on climate change mitigation and adaptation measures, as well as scaling -see Tables 3 (OICR) and 10 (MELIA).2021 Innovations. WHEAT and partners generated new knowledge related to value chains (consumer demand, farmer adoption dynamics), climate-smart agricultural practices (zero tillage, water management and precision fertilizer) and cereal-based nutrition benefits-as well as feeding the breeding products pipeline -see Innovations Table 4.Ethiopia could achieve wheat self-sufficiency with existing technologies. Ethiopia is sub-Saharan Africa's largest wheat producer, but still imported 1.5 million tons of wheat in 2017. Narrowing the efficiency and resource yield-gaps can nearly double actual yields without having to expand the wheat area when input-use is increased, and crop management practices are fine-tuned. Government policies should foster accessibility and affordability of fertilizers, whilst promoting precision management technologies (mechanization and herbicides), which helps to avoid environmental externalities -see Table 10 (4428). How can we reduce child zinc-deficiency in Ethiopia? WHEAT and MAIZE scientists strengthened the evidence base on the potential of zinc agronomic biofortification (e.g. zinc fertilizer leading to grains containing zinc) and recommend an integrated strategy that involves both genetic and agronomic fortification -see Table 10 (4453).Reducing nitrogen dioxide (N2O) emissions from maize and wheat fields (with CCAFS). Scientists estimated N2O emission-reduction potential by reducing excess nitrogen applications and keeping current yield levels. Results show considerable reductions, particularly in those countries and regions where existing nitrogen losses and emissions are very high. Previous studies had shown huge (~ 44 Tg yr −1 ) global total nitrogen losses from maize, wheat and rice fields (mostly China, USA and India). There is tremendous potential for improving the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in cereal production in many countries without compromising yield.Other FP1-led foresight study findings are featured in the Executive Summary above.High-Biological Nitrification Inhibition (BNI)-wheat: Proof of concept and potential impacts on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions including N2O -with FP1. WHEAT and partner scientists successfully bred high BNI-elite lines that also showed greater overall biomass and grain yield, with no negative effects on grain protein levels or breadmaking quality. In parallel, FP1 researchers developed a new model based on life-cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated at each stage of wheat production for BNI-enabled wheat. A 9.5% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer-derived greenhouse gasses is attainable if BNI-enabled wheat with 40% nitrification-inhibition were grown on slightly acidic to neutral soils (ca. 30%, or 72 million ha, of the world's wheat area of 240 million ha) -see Table 10 (4421 & 4422) and Innovation #2590.Private and public sector consensus on priority, pre-competitive wheat productivity research domains. A group of public sector and major seed companies' scientists identified key translational research areas (e.g. to translate knowledge from pure plant science to crop breeding) with a high probability of boosting productivity: research into hormones, recombination, respiration, roots and source-sink make it more feasible to explore crop genetic resources and improve breeding strategies and the models behind them. The scientists' focus was on researchable issues that benefit from combining breakthrough technologies with proven ones. Companies and institutes affiliated with the review are collaborating to develop a partnership to address these challenges in pre-competitive space -see Table 10 (4336).WHEAT and NARS partner researchers dissected the genetic architecture of wheat grain yield (GY) potential and stress-resilience by performing a large-scale genome-wide association study (100 datasets, 105,000 GY observations from 55,568 wheat lines evaluated [2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013][2014][2015][2016][2017][2018][2019]. The analysis substantiated the positively-correlated performance of lines in optimum and stressed environments, indicating that simultaneous improvement for GY potential and stress-resilience is feasible. The scientists demonstrated the association of Yld.cim-1BS.10 with GY in all studied environments, indicating its exceptional value in breeding for GY in optimum, drought-and heatstressed environments.Deep learning (DL) applications for genomic prediction and selection in wheat breeding. Scientists cite strong evidence that DL algorithms capture nonlinear patterns more efficiently than conventional genome-based ones. DL algorithms are able to integrate data from different sources, implying their ability to improve prediction accuracy for large plant breeding data -see Table 10 (4501).With regard to future research priorities, WHEAT and partner scientists from five countries looked at wheat root systems, which capture the water and nutrients needed to support crop growth. Improved root systems tailored to specific environments could improve climate resiliency. Authors listed these critical steps to underpin future direct selection of root traits for improved crop performance: (1) establishment and routine use of high-throughput, high-precision, field-based phenotyping approaches, (2) development of molecular tools with which to track and combine beneficial alleles controlling RSA, and critically, (3) record detailed knowledge of which Root System Architectures (RSA) are best suited to a given agricultural environment and to the wider genetic architecture of the germplasm used in a breeding program. In 'Recognizing the hidden half in wheat: Root system attributes associated with drought tolerance,' researchers conclude that known functions of key genes (e.g. association with seedling biomass) will provide information for the genetic dissection of root development of wheat in a wide range of conditions and will be beneficial for molecular breeding.At least 70 CGIAR-derived varieties were released in 13 countries in 2021 -see table here and in Table 4.Ongoing, applied research with partners aims to shorten the breeding cycle: proof-of-concept for early generation genomic section, validation of a high-throughput phenotyping approach to measuring plant height, tailoring crops by combining genetic resources and transformative capabilities (e.g. genomic breeding, synthetic biology); and a multi-CRP collaboration, in which scientists argued for a way forward with genomic breeding approaches (e.g. marker-assisted selection, -backcrossing, genomic prediction, etc.) for six crops.WHEAT and partner scientists discovered through reserve genetics that Ae. tauschii is a reservoir for unique, high molecular weight glutenin (Glu-D1) alleles. This provides the genomic resource to begin utilizing new alleles for end-use quality improvement, a key priority for most breeders -see Table 10 (4364). After analysis, WHEAT scientists concluded that current methods used for evaluating wheat breadmaking quality are effective to predict low-sodium bread-but not whole meal bread quality. Given that eating whole meal bread is more nutritious, breeders will want to select lines with high whole meal bread-making potential in the future. With this in mind, the authors proposed to use grain hardness and SDS-sedimentation volume as predictive traits.Innovative CIMMYT and ICARDA scientists validated a new tool (e.g. standardized database with API) that enabled use of big data to create more precise models to predict destructive, timeconsuming and expensive wet chemistry tests using the near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) spectra of grain, flour and straw samples.NARS partner scientists investigated six farm management scenarios (multi-year, on-farm trials in India) and showed that Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices (CSAPs) reduced global warming potential (e.g. mitigation impact thru GHG reductions) and improved nitrogen productivity, ecoefficiency and yield during good and bad years (compared to business-as-usual). CSAPs can cope better with climatic extremes and should be promoted in South Asian rice-wheat belts and beyond, so farmers can better adapt and contribute to climate change mitigation -see Table 10 (4413). The results of a survey-based study in Bihar suggest that a reduced knowledge gap among women farmers would increase CSAPs adoption and consequently reduce the likelihood of male outmigration -see Table 10 (4593). Multi-year, on-farm trials in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains showed that improved conservation agriculture-based sustainable intensification management practices (CASI) reduced both laboruse and total cropping system production costs by around 40%, and increased gross margins by up to 25%. Results showed the potential to increase livelihoods and reduce the impact of labor shortages for smallholder farmers living in diverse climatic, edaphic and social circumstances. Findings are relevant to labor-constrained smallholder cropping systems in South Asia and beyond, especially because of the potential for reduced drudgery for women and youth who do the majority of menial, laborious tasks -see Table 10 (4442).Farmers who adopted only one or two of the three conservation agriculture (CA) principles obtained higher yield and income than those who continued with conventional agriculture. Adoption of all three components led to higher socioeconomic benefits than both partial adoption and conventional practices. In the face of the low and slow adoption of CA in Morocco, an incremental approach toward full CA adoption might prove effective and is worth testing for contrasting climates, soils, and cropping systems in MENA drylands. Recent estimates showed CA adoption on about 24,000 ha of Moroccan wheat area, mainly in the rainfed areas, indicating its efficacy in soil moisture-retention.A comprehensive review of Conservation Agriculture practices (CA) in the Middle East North Africa (MENA) region (6% of world population in 2019) highlighted that about 25-40% of the 53 million hectares of arable land is suitable for climate-smart CA. Successful sustainable intensification of wheat-based systems depends on greater CA adoption and clustering and tailoring of solutions, such as affordable and versatile no-till seeders and integrated crop management practices -see Table 10 (4617).A new study identified two major limitations of the land sparing/sharing analytical framework:(1) the reliance on yield-density relationships that focus on trade-offs and overlook synergies between agriculture and biodiversity, and (2) the overemphasis on crop yield, neglecting other metrics of agricultural performance, which may be more important to local farmers, and more strongly associated with positive biodiversity outcomes.See Executive Summary on p.5 above.CIMMYT and ICARDA maintained their Business Continuity Plan to protect the continuity of critical operations, steered by a Crisis Management Team that managed each centers' contingency plan. continuous performance (observable behavior), reproduction and renegotiation of gender takes place as part of everyday lived experience as new livelihood opportunities challenge local, normative understandings of what it means to be a woman or a man. They conclude that although national and local discourse embraces the idea of gender equality, reality is quite often different.Researchers, when looking at zero-tillage users and subsequent herbicide applications in the Eastern Gangetic Plains of Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, observed that zero-tillage does not reinforce or deepen existing inequalities within households. By last year, other scientists had already proposed policy options to promote climate-smart technologies in India that have the potential to mitigate GHG emissions and reduce women's labor drudgery.The 'Women, work, and wage equity in agricultural labor in Saiss (Morocco)' study led to a collective bargaining agreement between workers in wheat-based systems and the Government of Morocco, and a new project, which aims to integrate gender interventions into conservation agriculture in crop-livestock systems in Tunisia.Researchers called for policies in Southern Ethiopia that not only ensure equal levels of production resources, but also help households to build their capacity, improving both transitory and chronically food-insecure situations. Based on a representative Zambian household study, other WHEAT/MAIZE scientists recommended policies that promote equitable access to production resources, such as land, to reduce the gaps in market participation between men and women.Outcomes. MAIZE and WHEAT researchers, together with colleagues from within and outside the CGIAR, contributed to two important policy impacts and practices (Morocco) and published findings with clear policy implications based on gender-transformative research and methods (Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Ethiopia, Malawi and Tanzania). With this knowledge, researchers are also able to influence policy decisions with potentially longer-term social change impacts (Nepal and Zambia). See OICR4387.Embedding W1&2-funded strategic gender research in larger bilateral R4D projects has proved useful.Key constraints remain unchanged: Gender research capacity.With USDA funding, CIMMYT and the Afghan Agricultural Research Institute (ARIA) started to build a roadmap towards improving ARIA's basic wheat research capacity. This was halted by the Taliban takeover of government. Afghanistan remains a major source of landrace-based genetic diversity, in particular for drylands.Under the bilaterally funded CSISA-Mechanization project in Bangladesh, CIMMYT partnered with 104 agriculture-based light engineering (ABLE) enterprises, which included youth entrepreneurs. 85 of them had signed agreements with CSISA-MEA during 2021 and 53 received workforce and business management training. 120 workforce staff received foundries' practices training. More than 50% trainees were youth and they had 2-15 years' work experience in this sector.275 training and learning events of all shapes and sizes took place in 2021, several of them in virtual format, including the Basic Wheat Improvement Course that has been running since 1968. WHEAT has supported young(er) scientists' on-the-job learning since 2012: 75% of WHEAT trainees 2012-2021 were from low-and middle-income countries. With eleven advanced courses on Conservation Agriculture-Asia & North Africa running since 2010, nearly 200 young researchers from NARS got hands-on learning for building resilience of wheat-based systems. The 2nd cohort of Arab Women Leaders in Agriculture (AWLA) started in September, co-funded by WHEAT and led by the International Center for Biosaline Agriculture (ICBA) -see also evidence for Table 8.Based on survey data collected from 691 wheat fields in 3 major wheat-producing provinces, 19.3% of total wheat area in the three Egyptian provinces is cultivated with raised beds (RB). Modeling results showed that RB adoption enabled a reduction in irrigation water application (15-21% irrigation water savings reported) and 5.56% water productivity increase. By 2023, approximately 800,000 ha wheat area in Egypt will be planted with raised bed technology (Alwang et al, 2018). In northern Ethiopia, the long-term (2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013) influence of conservation agriculture-based systems (with permanently-raised beds) on soil health and crop productivity showed the potential of improving crop productivity through CA-improved soil healthsee Table 1, SLO2.4.Scientists gained insights into the influences of climate change on India's future water footprints (WF) of cereal crop production and put forth regional strategies for future water resource management. In view of future variability in WFs, a water footprint-based optimization can be conducted by relocating crop cultivation areas with the aim of minimizing blue water use (fresh, non-renewable) as a possible management alternative -see Table 10 (4433) CCAFS collaboration.In related CCAFS/WHEAT research, scientists calculated that if all rice and wheat farmers in India adopted the Nutrient Expert Tool-based fertilizer recommendation practice, 13.92 million tons (Mt) more rice and wheat production would follow, with 1.44 Mt less N fertilizer use, and a reduction in GHG of 5.34 Mt CO2e per year-a significant improvement over farmers' current practice -see Table 10 (4504).Understanding farm households' climate risk-coping strategies: Evidence from five countries in Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA). Droughts, floods and crop pests and diseases are major climate change-induced risks. Farm households in ESA have adopted four major strategies to cope with climate risk, including changing farming methods and decreasing consumption. Farmers who are better-off tend to change their farming methods but are unlikely to adopt other risk-coping options. There are substantial differences among the countries in the study -see Table 10 A systematic evaluation of CIMMYT's work on climate change-food system interactions (e.g. research portfolio, including bilateral andCGIAR Research Program projects, 2012-2021) showed that the Center's research-for-development efforts contributed to scaling out several climate-smart technologies and practices in climatically challenged locations and production systems in Asia, Africa and Latin America. This analysis showed that CIMMYT's outputs have been distributed to more than 150 countries -see Table 10 (4448).The WHEAT Independent Steering Committee (WHEAT-ISC) held two meetings together with MAIZE-ISC to understand OneCGIAR consequences for WHEAT and MAIZE CRPs' continuity, as well as the future of independent scientific advice at the research program level under OneCGIAR. Together with RTB and MAIZE-Independent Steering Committees, the WHEAT-ISC Chair continued to lead advocacy efforts, which culminated in a meeting with two of the new Global Science Directors in November and ISDC advice to System Council taking on some of the joint-ISC's concerns and recommendations.The WHEAT Management Committee (WHEAT-MC) managed uncertainties with regard to CRP closure and associated staff continuity in the face of CGIAR-EMT/SO guidance coming late. Most important for WHEAT-MC was to maintain research pace, capacity and quality in the face of some scientists engaging in Initiative Design Teams; and of COVID-19 consequences, which also affected some WHEAT long-time partners -and thus, certain running partner grants (Bolivia, Myanmar, India). WHEAT experienced some core staff turn-over during 2021 (FP1 and FP4 Lead; ICARDA DDG-R; MEL specialist; Communications).WHEAT-MC and -ISC spent significant amounts of time on keeping up to date on OneCGIAR progress and possible consequences for WHEAT research scope and continuity. MAIZE and WHEAT researchers developed 22 Golden Egg ideas, of which 4 made it to the Transfer Marketplace.See also Table 9, below. No new partnerships were set up in 2021, because WHEAT was in its final year. Thus, the focus was on maintaining W1&2-funded partnerships and closing the running partner grants, also in view of future partner funding uncertainty.Long-term effects of organic manure and inorganic fertilization on soil quality (soybean-wheat rotation in mid-Himalaya India). NARS partner scientists, based on a 21-year fertilization experiment, showed that NPK (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer) plus farmyard manure embodied the best management practice for soil biological sustainability and for sustainable food production.WHEAT has been a partner to the G20 Wheat Initiative since 2012, which celebrated its first decade of operation. 21 WHEAT (CIMMYT & ICARDA) scientists continue to engage in 10 of the 11 Expert Working Groups (EWG). During 2021, the Durum EWG established an open source grant program. The Agronomy EWG made a call for action on transformational agronomy for impact; to establish an Associated Program to mitigate the interference of climate on wheat yield-stability. The Wheat Initiative set up AHEAD -Alliance for Adaptation to Heat and Drought, to coordinate projects that engage in wheat heat and drought research.Collaborations with A4NH, Big Data, CCAFS, MAIZE, PIM/COVID-19 Hub and RICE were maintained. CCAFS collaborations are featured in the Climate Change section above. FTA, GLDC, MAIZE and WHEAT scientists make the case for a reforestation pathway not previously described in the literature: A return to a more diverse agricultural landscape mosaic provided more secure and diversified income sources along with better provisioning of construction materials, fuelwood, and higher livestock numbers. In a related study, scientists show that tree species diversity matters as much as the amount of tree cover for the production of food, and it can contribute to improve food security (parklands in Central Senegal) -see Table 10 (4426).Center) this year? Note: Further information can be found here.CIMMYT and ICARDA maintained their relevant policies to support greater transparency, including in partnerships and results dissemination, in line with the CGIAR Principles.WHEAT is not a legal entity. The management of legal assets relevant to the CRP is managed by WHEAT Lead and participant centers, both of which annually submit a detailed and confidential intellectual asset report to the System Board and the information contained therein is not repeated here. Flagship projects, WHEAT and CIMMYT-PMU do not, on their own, manage intellectual assets without consulting with the Lead Center's legal department; the same applies to ICARDA.CIMMYT and ICARDA have not filed, nor has any CIMMYT or ICARDA partner informed CIMMYT/ICARDA, of any application for patent or plant variety protection associated with intellectual assets (IA) developed under WHEAT.Critical issues and challenges that remain relevant: During 2021, WHEAT was part of the Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Community of Practice (MEL Cop) Steering Committee, participated in the impact indicator collection exercise to contribute to a stronger impact delivery in One CGIAR and supported implementation of IATI standards.Via the MEL CoP, WHEAT also contributed to developing CGIAR evaluation policy (CAS) and cohosted the annual MEL CoP meeting (Day 1: CRPs Theory of Change lessons learnt and scaling readiness in the new OneCGIAR context).WHEAT actively participated in the CGIAR-wide discussion about professionally wrapping CRPs by contributing to the Golden Eggs activity (e.g. ensure knowledge hand-over to new Initiatives), sharing MAIZE and WHEAT close-out plans and contributing to CRP leader consensus positions on technical and financial closing down matters.Of the 62 MELIA studies published this year, 15 focus on foresight and future targeting of R4D, including breeding research. Another 10 studies relate to climate change adaptation or mitigation issues, whilst 16 projects and post-project assessments investigated adoption and innovation pathways or drivers. 2 MELIA studies addressed strategic gender research.No reporting this year.Two major risks remain unchanged during Phase II: 1) W1&W2 budget insecurity and delayed transfer of W1&2 funds, which could directly affect CRP research and development operations; 2)Unfulfilled obligations by the partners for commissioned and competitive (sub)-grants.Budget insecurity was lower than in 2020 (see section 3, below). Because partners, as well as CIMMYT and ICARDA scientists, could not complete all deliverables on time, mostly due to COVID-19 consequences, several partners asked for no-cost extensions and a number of W1&2-funded milestones remain only partially achieved.The risk of effectively double-booked resources that negatively impact CRP delivery, visible in 2020, grew stronger during 2021. Approximately 20-25% of WHEAT scientists were pulled into Initiative Design Teams during much of 2021, whilst COVID-19 restrictions affected some of their regular field work.Planning ahead for a semi-structured hand-over of CRP's outputs, learnings, and also program management practices to the new Initiatives, did not take place, apart from the Golden Egg activity and some SO-led CRP/FP/Initiatives matching efforts.'Lack of a systematic and integrated approach for monitoring and evaluation at the outcome level' no longer presented a major risk, as the CRPs Phase 2 annual reporting standards, methods and tools proved to be effective and functional, with very few exceptions.No change compared to 2020 annual reporting.WHEAT is guided by the high-level framework for W1&2 deployment shown below, while Table 12 shows in more detail where W1&2 has been invested during 2021, based on the 80+ work packages in the W1&2-per-FP annual work plan delivered by CIMMYT and ICARDA scientists and their implementation partners. In 2021, WHEAT shall receive a total of US$3.92M W2 support from Australia (ACIAR) and UK (DFID) and $7.46M W1 from Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, India, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, UK and the World Bank. Total new W1&2 income was planned at $11.38M, up from $10.476M (2020). As in 2020, USAID shifted earlier W2 contributions to W3, linked to the AGG and Crops to End Hunger bilateral projects. Bilateral funder support is documented in the WHEAT Annual Financial Report and in the CGIAR Financial Dashboards.W1&2 funding level and disbursement was more stable than in 2020. The risk of a lower W2 contribution from FCDO did become a reality in late August/September but was fully buffered by CGIAR Stabilization Fund. Notwithstanding intentions documented in the original 2017-21 CGIAR Financial Plan, 2021 disbursements did not all take place in the first two quarters. A final disbursement (ca. 7% of 2021 W1&2 budget) remains to be issued in 2022.In view of the CGIAR-EMT decision to allow only $60,000 residual expenditure in 2022 for closing CRPs, both MAIZE-and WHEAT-MCs noted that 2021 annual reporting would very likely be at a lower quality than previous years during Phase II, because required resourcing and scientists' commitment might not be secured, and their priorities and reporting lines may have changed. To mitigate this risk, both MCs committed to starting and finishing the 2021 annual reporting process earlier. • Geographic Scope: Multinational.• Countries: Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, The Republic of the Sudan, Tunisia, Syrian Arab Republic.In Bangladesh, wheat production meets only 16% of consumer demand. Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI) released more than 30 varieties in the past 30 years and has collaborated with CIMMYT since 1983. Because BWMRI lacks the regulatory framework and infrastructure to accurately track adoption rates, it conducted DNA fingerprinting across the 6 wheat growing regions (2018-2019 season). Scientists documented that of 1,791 samples from farmers' fields, 50% of samples were from varieties released since 2010; 32% matched with older varieties. The 3 most common varieties, all wheat-blast susceptible, were well distributed across the 6 regions, showing broad adoption of CGIAR-derived varieties. Varieties released in the past 5 years, including BARIGom33 (2017; wheat blast resistant) were detected in 4% or less of field samples, with total coverage of 7.3% of wheat area, equivalent to ca 25,000 of Bangladesh's 340,000 ha. Recent Government initiatives aim to speed up seed supply. Currently, it takes 4-5 years to get seed to all farmers. Ca. 12 million Bangladeshi rice-wheat farmers (of 16.5M total farmers) grow ca. 1.1 million tons of wheat on ca. 320,000 ha (USDA, 2021-22 season).• Geographic Scope: National. Stage 1 OICR4470 -Responding to wheat blast: Multi-stakeholder \"Precision Phenotyping Platforms (PPP)\" and the development, then release of blast resistant varieties.Stage 2For international germplasm for research exchange (IWIN) and CGIAR-derived varieties released in 2021 information, see page 9 above and here. Completed FP2 scientists demonstrated that identifying an environmental index (i.e., a combination of environmental parameter and growth window) enables genome-wide association studies and genomic selection of complex traits to be conducted with an explicit environmental dimension. Another group of scientists evaluated three different genome-enabled prediction models (M1-M3) to study the effect of the sparse testing in terms of the genomic prediction accuracy. Another study found that for grain yield the prediction performance was highest using a multi-trait compared to a single-trait model. The higher the absolute genetic correlation between traits the greater the benefits of multi-trait models for increasing the genomic-enabled prediction accuracy of traits. Synthesis report on farmer decision making processes evaluates the effectiveness of linkages between women farmers and service providers: \"Feminization of agriculture processes offer everyone who works in wheat systems in South Asia 54 Mediterranean rainfed conditions stability, and adoption of CA practices are important in the context of the Mediterranean rainfed environment. Integrating trade-off analysis between yield potential and stability in a rainfall gradient in both CT and CA in the national certification scheme of varieties may be more efficient than developing breeding programs for each type of tillage system.Completed Synthesis (secondary) studyApplication of scale-appropriate agricultural machinery can bring a wide range of benefits in agriculture production. In Morocco, most agriculture operations are mechanized. Government provides subsides ranging from 30% to 70% to purchase agriculture machinery and equipment. The rate of agricultural mechanization has increased from 5 tractors per 1,000 ha in 2008 to 9 tractors per 1,000 ha in 2018, exceeding the FAO standard of 5 tractors per 1,000 ha. But agricultural tractors are still under-utilized (low annual operating time 400 to 600 hours/year), except for a few large, modern, often irrigated farms, especially orchards. Also, to improve mechanization-based efficiency gains, mechanization needs to be well adapted to local conditions. A marketing network for mechanization and service delivery is needed, to support small farmers in easily accessing reasonably priced machinery. CGIAR NIR Database project aimed at providing new tools for nutritional and enduse quality data management while facilitating the analysis of a greater number of traits and increasing the accuracy of non-destructive and cost-effective methods of analysis. Within this project, a new online database was developed to standardize, store and manage wet chemistry and NIR quality data generated from multiple crops by both CIMMYT and ICARDA quality laboratories. Equipped with the API interface which facilitates the extraction of stored data in the desired format, this database greatly facilitates the use of \"Big Data\" to create new and more precise NIR models to predict destructive, time-consuming and expensive wet chemistry tests for both grain, flour and straw samples. Thus, a new analytical pipeline to develop and fine-tune new prediction models was created. This pipeline is currently being assembled in an R package and will be soon available to the international community. 55 S4291 -Project on Enhancing Food Security in the Arab Countries (EFSAC): Farmer adoption levels (see also SLO Table 1.2)Completed EPIA: Ex-post Impact AssessmentEnhancing Food Security in the Arab Countries project (EFSAC) in 10 countries since 2011. EFSAC focused on improving wheat production and yield in wheatbased agricultural systems through dissemination of improved and proven technologies. Analysis of returns to investment in only 5 out of the 10 project countries during 4-year-Phase II led to an average of 24% of the farm households in the project areas in all the five countries adopted new improved varieties along with at least two of the other components of the technology packages introduced by EFSAC. On average, at least 73% of the adoption level achieved in the 4-years of Phase II can be attributed to EFSAC, implying an adoption level of 17.7% (73% x 24.35%) of the total 1.3M ha of wheat area in the project intervention regions: On This study analyzed the genetic variability of the high-molecular-weight glutenin's encoded by the genes at the Glu-D1 locus, within a set of 273 Ae. tauschii accessions. To understand the genetic variants of these genes, all the 273 accessions were genotyped, and 45 Glu-D1 haplotypes were discovered. The modern wheat Glu-D1 allele called \"2+12\" was found in Ae. tauschii Lineage 2, the donor of the wheat D-subgenome. Conversely, the superior quality modern wheat Glu-D1 allele called \"5+10\" originated in Lineage 3, a recently characterized lineage of Ae. tauschii, showing a unique origin of this important allele. These two alleles were also quite similar relative to the total observed molecular diversity in Ae. tauschii at Glu-D1. Ae. tauschii is thus a reservoir for unique Glu-D1 alleles and provides the genomic resource to begin utilizing new alleles for end-use quality improvement in wheat breeding programs. FAO (2017: pp.83-84) projected that staple cereals will continue to play a critical role for food security until 2050, contributing nearly half of both daily calories and protein intake in low-and middle-income countries. In wheat and maize value chains their contribution to food security in Africa and Asia, the (4th) stability and utilization dimension of food security merits increased (research) attention (e.g. address climate change-driven stresses; promote healthier diets; equitable transformation of food systems), Considerable benefits in yields and sustainability have been found in integrated systems, where maize and wheat, livestock production and agro-forestry in SSA are practiced together (e.g., Baudron et al., 2014). These approaches have been mostly applied in more difficult farming conditions, to increase climate resilience (FAO, 2016), though they have the potential to increase sustainability and preserve ecosystem functions (WBGU, S4431 -Farmers who adopted only one or two of the three CA principles obtained higher yield and income than those who continued with conventional agriculture.Credible evidence that farmers who partially adopted only one or two of the three CA principles obtained higher yield and income than those who continued with conventional agriculture. Adoption of all three components of the CA system led to higher socioeconomic benefits than both partial adoption and conventional practices. Wider diffusion of complete CA system would significantly contribute to productivity, profitability, and sustainability of agricultural production in drylands.In the face of the low and slow adoption of CA in Morocco, an incremental approach toward full CA adoption might prove effective and is worth testing for contrasting climates, soils, and cropping systems in MENA drylands. Recent estimates show that CA has been adopted on about 24,000 ha of wheat, mainly in the rainfed areas indicating its efficacy in soil moisture retention. On-farm participatory trials (400 farms, representative of a range of common crop production management across the Eastern Gangetic Plains) to compare the performance of traditional and improved conservation agriculture-based sustainable intensification management practices (CASI) to understand which used less labor, had lower production costs and returned higher gross margins. CASI reduced both labor use and total cropping system production costs by around 40% and increased gross margins by up to 25%. Results show there is potential to increase livelihoods and reduce the impact of labor shortages for smallholder farmers living in diverse climatic, edaphic and social circumstances across the region. Findings are relevant to labor-constrained smallholder cropping systems throughout South Asia and worldwide. Reduced drudgery for women and youth who do the majority of menial, laborious tasks is also an impact. Tailoring crops for drought adaptation may hold the key to future resilient production systems. Crops can encounter fluctuating drought scenarios along the crop cycle. Soil depth, water availability, management practices etc. also impact crop responses to water deficit. Conceptualizing a drought-adaptive ideotype optimized for many scenarios may not be possible. But distinct traits related to drought adaptation, which are similar across species grown under diverse conditions, could be used as targets for custom-designing crops. Developing designer crops that integrate individually strengthened leaf and root systems, can be simplified by implementing recent technical breakthroughs. Combining genetic resources and transformative capabilities (e.g. genomic breeding, synthetic biology, etc.) will be essential for tailoring crops. The context-dependent effect of each trait, multiplicity of combined traits, and genotype × environment interactions for each trait necessitates the use of modeling innovations, to derive a probabilistic approach for identifying the most desirable allelic combinations. Scientists estimated the potential for N2O emission reductions from maize and wheat fields based on reducing excess N applications while keeping current yield levels. Results show considerable N2O emission reduction globally, particularly in those countries and regions where existing N losses and emissions are very high (see Fig. 6). Although limited in spatial coverage, previous studies showed huge (~ 44 Tg yr−1) global total N losses from maize, wheat and rice fields, mostly concentrated in China and USA for maize and China & India for wheat and rice production (Liu et al., 2016). This shows a tremendous potential for improving the efficiency of N use in cereal production in many countries without compromising yield (Liu et al., 2018, Liu et al., 2016) and even increasing it (Mueller et al., 2014;Xu et al., 2015). Little is known about the contribution of trehalose phosphate synthase (TPS) and trehalose phosphate phosphatase (TPP) genes to achieving a carbon allocation balance that ultimately helps maximize expression of grain yield through the mediation of T6P. A wealth of information on natural variation of TPS and TPP genes related to yield potential was generated, which confirms T6P's role in resource allocation, in affecting grain number and other traits. This opens up the possibility for translational research to explore natural genetic variation in these enzymes and incorporate their alleles into elite wheat backgrounds, thereby achieving a better understanding of how to deploy them in mainstream breeding.These results have high translational potential to most crop species, since the regulation of partitioning of carbon to edible structures is a fundamental yield determinant.https Across 62 varieties released between 1911 and 2016, WHEAT partner scientists performed genetic gain analysis, which showed a significant increase in grain yield (0.4% year−1) and negative gain for iron (−0.11% year−1) and zinc (−0.15% year−1).The Green Revolution Rht-B1 & -D1 genes had a strong association with plant height and grain yield; semi-dwarfing alleles had a negative effect on GFe and GZn contents. Kalium was significantly higher and Selenium, Magnesium and copper were significantly higher in cultivars released before 1965. Thus, improvements in yield was not translated into an improvement in micro-and macronutrients.Although iron (0.06 mg/kg/year) and zinc (0.15% year) slightly declined in modern wheat compared to old cultivars, some high-yielding cultivars (Zincol-2016, AAS-2011) with high levels of micronutrients are available. Elucidating the genetic basis of grain yield and micronutrient concentrations could help to develop cultivars with both improved yield and biofortification status. represented by the sub-population Jenah Zarzoura and the robustness and high relationships between phenotypic and genome-wide genetic structure using DArTseq method. These findings will enhance the conservation efforts of these landraces and their use in breeding efforts at national and international levels to adapt to dry conditions. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3583680030.json b/main/part_2/3583680030.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5ff8ed0a8009b2e899a7f015df80984bb45c3be --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3583680030.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"49c385445f193551ea27b0d6bf47af6a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5c21146b-1ba9-41a0-a161-3a5f2419d25c/retrieve","id":"-2024778170"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b0493b2e-9c8a-4eec-93d8-6abf77d30f20","content":"Kenneth M. Quinn for making my summer once in a lifetime internship possible. I would also like to thank Lisa Fleming for arranging the details of my trip, and watching over me while I was in Ethiopia to make sure things ran as smoothly and productively as possible.I would like to thank two teachers who got me involved in the World Food Prize program. The first is my Talented and Gifted teacher Laura Sievers, who also happens to be my mom. She heard about the World Food Prize at a conference, and was the first to tell me about it.The second is Melanie Bloom, who has been my high school Agriculture teacher and FFA advisor. Mrs. Bloom had gone overseas while she was in college, and she explained the experiences and benefits I would be getting out of a trip like this. She also taught many things in my agriculture classes that have been very useful to me this summer. I would also like to thank my two great high school science teachers, Mrs. McClatchy and Mr. Woelber, for everything they taught me in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics, specifically the scientific approaches that helped me to better understand everything I learned about the research carried out here at ILRI. Thanks also to my supervisor here at ILRI, Dr. Tadelle. He was very patient with me and helped me learn more then I could ever have imagined about tryps and about the production of cattle in Ethiopia. He has been like a father to me here, even inviting me to his home, and made sure my stay was very eventful. I would also like to thank Dr. Woudyalew, Brahno, and Michael for helping me and including me in all of the activities in the field. Also I would like to thank Nahom Tadelle for taking me into Addis Abba and showing me around the city. It was really cool to see everything through the perspective of someone my own age. Thanks also to Nahom's Uncle Seleshi for driving us around many times and helpingme bargain in the souvenir shops. Being able to spend this time seeing everything and being away from the office really helped break up the work and make this an enjoyable stay.I would also like to thank all of the other staff here at ILRI for making this feel like a second home to me. The maids were always very kind to me and even cleaned up my cooking messes. Dr. Ananda and his secretary made sure every part of my stay at ILRI was safe and eventful. I would like to thank my friend Mesofin, a security guard here at ILRI, for taking time out of his day to take me into Addis and show me what and where to buy food so I could cook.Finally, I would like to thank my family for being very supportive throughout this whole experience. They were always there to talk to and kept me updated on what was happening at home. I would like to thank my grandpa for everything he has taught me about raising cattle help in all of the work being done here. Finally, I would like to g me to go when he could have used my help on the farm. which enabled me to be able to thank my father for encouragin Introduction I have lived on my family's farm about 5 miles south of Albert City, Iowa, my whole life.My dad, uncle, and grandpa operate a farm together. The farming operation consists of raising corn, soybeans, cattle, and hogs. As long as I can remember, cattle have been my favorite species of animal to raise. My experiences have led me to my interest in becoming a veterinarian. I will be going to Iowa State University this fall, majoring in Animal Science -Pre Vet and hope to continue on to veterinary school after that.Along with my farming background, I have been actively involved in 4-H and FFA. I have raised and shown cattle, hogs, sheep, and goats for projects at our county fair. Through raising livestock, I have learned a lot about responsibility, which started in the 4 th grade with bucket bottle calves and grew into junior feeders, lead calves, sheep, goats, and also leading an FFA cooperative called Corduroy Pork, where a group of six FFA members raised hogs to show at local fairs. I have also learned much through livestock judging. I have been on our county livestock judging team for 8 years, and it has taught me much about what characteristics to look for in any species. This January, I had the opportunity to judge at the National Western Stock Show in Denver, Colorado. I have also learned many leadership skills through these programs and have served as president and treasurer of my school's FFA, and secretary, treasurer, and president of my 4H club. 4H and FFA were two of the key organizations that started my travels with trips to Washington, D.C., Indianapolis, Indiana, Southeastern Kansas, Denver, CO, and various trips to Ames and Des Moines.In high school, I have always tried to take challenging classes and strive to do my best in everything. I took many college credit classes, such as Pre Calculus, Calculus, Animal Science, and Crop Production. I was in a variety of activities, such as football, wrestling, 4H and FFA, band, speech, and other various groups.I attended the World Food Prize Symposium in 2007, which is when I really became interested in applying for an internship. With the topic that year of food vs. fuel, and living near an ethanol plant, I chose to write about the country of Brazil, as they were the big talk at the time regarding ethanol production. After sharing my own paper, I listened to the interns from that year and their presentations. I was really impressed by these presentations, and an internship sounded like a very good way to spend a summer. I applied in 2008 and was granted an interview. After the interview, I came to realize that this was not the summer for me to embark on this adventure, with 4H trips to Washington D.C. and Kansas already planned, and several family events taking place. This is why two days after my interview I withdrew my name from consideration, to be sure that someone else could have the great experience that summer. I then reapplied this year and was very glad to be granted an interview again. When asked which place The International Livestock Research Institute is a world of its own in the large city of Addis Ababa. Here the chaos of the city is replaced by trees, flowers, modern style buildings, and everything else that makes it feel almost like home. ILRI is composed of many organizations around the world that work here and perform research in a relaxing and safe environment. The sight in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia is one of the many branches of ILRI located throughout Africa and Asia, with the headquarters in Nairobi, Kenya. ILRI employs over 700 staff from 40 countries, with over 600 of them being nationally recruited, with the majority from Ethiopia and Kenya. ILRI's mission is \"To work at the crossroads of livestock and poverty, bringing high-quality science and capacity-building to bear on poverty reduction and sustainable development for poor livestock keepers and their communities.\" The strategy implemented has three main focuses: \"(1) securing the assets of the poor, (2) improving the productivity of their livestock systems and (3) improving their market opportunities.\" ILRI is funded from a variety of government agencies, development banks, private foundations and regional and international organizations. ILRI is also supported by Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). CGIAR is watching over 15 future harvest centers (including ILRI) whose mission is \"to contribute to food security and poverty eradication in developing countries through research, partnership, capacity building and policy support.\"Livestock is the main focus here at ILRI, as it seen as the way to bring the poor out of poverty. This is greatly justified as the rural poor rely so heavily on livestock for traction, fertilizer, meat, milk, income, other by-products, and the use of lands unable to be planted to crops through grazing. \"Of the 1.3 billion people living in absolute poverty, 80% live in rural areas and of these, two-thirds-some 678 million poor-keep livestock.\" So, as you can see, targeting livestock is targeting the largest portion of the poor throughout the world. With the demand for livestock products projected to greatly increase in developing countries, this can be a way to bring many rural poor out of poverty. The livestock in developing countries are eating grass, forages, and crop by products, and transforming this rather unused resource into protein, fat, and micronutrients. Livestock can also be seen as portable savings accounts for the rural poor because they can reproduce and provide them with anything they need. ILRI is a key player in making sure that livestock are properly managed without abusing the environment, and are being raised sustainably so they can live up to everything they are said to be. This is what I have observed in everything the Biotechnology team here at ILRI does while implementing projects and activities. ILRI sees the livestock revolution as the way to bring many of the rural poor out of poverty (ilri.org).Trypanosomiasis in cattle is the leading cause of mortality and loss of production throughout the horn of Africa. Trypanosomiasis in Ethiopia is a major problem, particularly in South and Southwestern Ethiopia and other areas below 1700m elevation.(Epidemiology #1)Tryps in short is transmitted by a special fly by the name of tsetse. When the fly is prevalent in an area, so is tryps. The three species of tsetse in the Ghibe Valley area are Glossia pallidipes, G. fuscipes, and G. morsitans submorsitans.Tryps is not a new problem by any means, going back many years. The disease was treated most often with diminazene, isometamidium, and homidium. This was very effective in curing the cattle until the late 1980's when the disease became resistant to all three of the drugs. This caused many people to leave tsetse infested areas and the death of many cattle. ILRI, by then called ILCA, really became involved with many different ways to try and control the disease. This was both going after the vector (tsetse fly), and trying to treat the cattle differently. It was found that even though treating cattle for tryps infection with diminazene, isometamidium, or homidium did not cure the disease, it did keep the cattle at a higher productivity level and often close to that of normal East African Zebu cattle. Other methods implemented and still continued today are the use of deltamethrin pour-on and traps to kill the tsetse fly. The use of the pour-on at first showed great reduction in the overall number of the tsetse and still continues to help reduce tryps infection rates among cattle. It has allowed the cattle to go into areas that previously they couldn't because of being bothered by the fly. This led to more productive grazing. The traps are located at the edges of the Ghibe Valley to help reduce the number of tsetse coming into the area. This has been a great help to the area and the fertile soil that had to be left because of the tsetse infestation can now again be farmed.The main project that is ongoing now at the research station is comparing four indigenous breeds of cattle: horro, sheko, abigar, and graughe. The project is near its end and is wrapping up with the results that the sheko are trypanotolerant and also interesting enough, that the horro respond very well to the diminazene shots and are very productive and the most productive with the shot. The abigar and graughe are both very unproductive in the tsetse infected region.Looking at the four breeds a little closer, I will start with the Guraghe. This is the Ethiopian highland breed which lives in the Guraghe and Hadiya highland areas in close vicinity to tsetse infested areas in the Ghibe Valley. The Guraghe are smaller in size, are chestnut, red, or roan in color, and have shorter horns. Next is the Abigar, who are found near the White Nile area, are of the Sanga group. They are large in body size, have long horns, and small humps representing the true Sanga. The third breed at ILRI research station is the Horro which is classified into the Zenga group of breeds (Zebu and Senga cross). They are medium to large in size, have medium to large horns, and are uniformly brown in color. The last breed is the Sheko, who are found in southwestern Ethiopia and are one of two native Bos Tauras breeds to Ethiopia.The Sheko are short horned or polled, do not have humps, are smaller in size, and are brown or black and white in color.The Sheko also have one very unique trait, they are trypanotolerant. This means they can live with tryps and still have good productivity rates. A worrisome thing about the Sheko is that there are few purebred Sheko left. They have been interbred with the Zebu cattle they are often being grazed with. So the next plan for ILRI is to multiply the Sheko in number using reproductive technologies such as embryo transfer and Artificial Insemination to greatly increase the number of Sheko. This will also come with a more intensive management to increase reproductive rates. ILRI sees the Sheko breed as being very special and useful to many areas not only being trypanotolerant but being very good in milk production and traction power.To put a sustainable approach to the treatment of cattle for tryps in the Ghibe Valley, Dr. Tadelle and through talking with various people at ILRI, is that the different partners are very hard to work with. Ethiopia's government is a dictatorship, and it takes a lot of effort to get something that ILRI has worked so hard to begin to be continued by the government. For example, Dr. Tadelle's team created a comprehensive database outlining all of the major poultry farms to help with disease outbreak, especially avian influenza. It is a database using a GIS system that has a map and is a very easy to use system to find all of the data. The plan is to put this map, which needs to be updated often, into the hands of the Ministry of Agriculture, so they can update it and use it for many purposes, including disease outbreaks. In order to do this, they must, in a sense, market the technology of the GIS system and their program to the political leaders through meetings and different opportunities just to keep the wonderful database they have created up and running. I have also been told that many wonderful programs created by ILRI and then handed over to the government have just kind of dissolved because of the lack of management and lack of care. This makes it very frustrating to go to all the work on a project, including securing someone to fund it, to end up with nothing.It is also a very tough endeavor to get the farmers to accept/understand research outputs and use it. The farmers do not care about numbers or studies; they just care about things that are going to improve what they are doing. They also have a tough time understanding the concept of that more input can lead to more output. I talked with one man who says you have to show them that what you are doing is better. This may take many times of carefully demonstrating before you fully convince anyone. There is also the idea in the back of the farmers' minds that the government is using this to get more control over them or to make them pay more taxes. For instance, Dr. Woudyalew told me it was very difficult to get the farmer cooperatives started, as the farmers thought it was another way for the government to control them and to get more started it takes much convincing and showing them the coops that are already in place. So as you can see, it can be a very frustrating job working with research trying to help the rural poor when it takes so long for them to accept and use it. Like everyone says, you can find solutions to all of the problems, but the tough part is getting people to use what you have discovered.One last thing that is very difficult for farmers in Ethiopia is the distribution of medicine in the private sector. When the farmers go to a privately owned veterinary office, they never know what they are getting. There is a trend for diluting things with water like the pour-on medicines, so they can make more profit on the product. Also, the prices in the private sector are very high for smallholder farmers. This is why ILRI and also the government have stepped in to t of many animals throughout Ethiopia. help with the treatmenThe first day of work was one that which I would never expected. I was told my advisor Dr. Tadelle's office was in Research Building 2 on the second floor, and that is where everything would start. I met Dr. Tadelle just as he was arriving for the day, and the first activity of the day was taking me to the Zebu club for coffee. Right from the start, I could see Dr. Tadelle was very laid back and someone I could talk to about anything. After coffee and discussing briefly what I would be doing while here at ILRI, I spent the first day on the DAGRIS database learning about all the different breeds of cattle in Ethiopia. This was very interesting to me to see how diverse the breeds are and how they each seemed to have their own special qualities for the area they were raised in.After the first day, I started reading research papers about trypanomiasis. I read about the history of tryps, the use of traps against the tsetse, the pouring of cattle to prevent tryps, the use of drugs and their effectiveness, and the trypanotolerant and suspected trypanotolerant breeds. I truly learned more than I could have ever imagined about tryps, and also the production of tropical cattle.My first trip to the Ghibe Valley came very quickly, just over a week after I arrived. I was very excited but also a little nervous as I was not sure what to expect. I found out soon enough there was nothing to worry about and the Ghibe Valley was absolutely beautiful.My first day of work began with a journey through the valley to ILRI's storehouse. This is where we collected the treatment and pouring medicine. After this, we drove up a rather rough road to an area where the farmers gather with their herds of cattle. The cattle were brought in groups of an average of fifteen, and kept just in their own little herds by their owners. I was amazed to see how the cattle owners knew exactly which animals were theirs and how content the cattle were to just stand and wait. Also, unlike what I was used to, there were no working chutes or corals. To my surprise the cattle were just grabbed by their horns or ears and hung on by one or two of their owners. If there was an aggressive animal, it would be tied to a tree or a wooden post would be held by two people in front of its rear legs.After observing for a short while how the cattle were handled, I was able to help with pouring the cattle. For the first week, the application was 20ml per adult and 10ml per young of Biodelta. This is a pour on with the active ingredient of Deltamehrin, and has the main focus of protection against the tsetse fly, but also kills other external parasites like ticks. The product is applied starting from the neck, across the back line, and ending at the tail head. To have the pour on applied to the cattle the farmer must pay 5 Birr for a token for each animal to be poured from the farmers' cooperative, which I then collect when I have completed pouring the farmer's cattle.The pourings main focus is to kill the tsetse fly and keep them away from the cattle. However it also helps ride the animals of all external parasites and has really helped against tick infestation.I was also able to assist in the treatment of the animals suspected to have tryps. The first question I asked was how they knew which ones had it, and I was told the farmers are very good about knowing when their cattle are sick and what it is. They said no tests were needed to test for diseases because the farmers knew the cattle that were sick. To treat the cattle first what had to happen was the mixing of the medicine. Depending on the area there were two treatments used, Veriben and Diminazen. The medicine came in packets and had to be mixed with water.For the Veriben each packet was mixed with 15 ml of water and for the Diminazen each packet was mixed with 12.5 ml of water. This was done carefully with safe water brought from Addis, and we used a graduated cylinder to measure the water into a big water bottle to mix with all of the medicine from the packets. We then took the mixed medicine and treated those cattle that the farmers also had paid 6 Birr for a token from the farmers' cooperative. The doses were adjusted to estimated body weight and were given at 1 ml per 15 to 20 kg. The needle was inserted first and then the syringe was attached and the treatment given. The toughest part of the process was getting the needle through the tough hide of the cattle, and it took a lot of force.The only thing that changed was the use of ectopour instead of the biodelta that was used on the first trip. The application rate was the same as the biodelta being 20ml per adult and 10ml per calf. This came as a change only because of availability.The work performed by ILRI is done over a period of a week, in what is up to 7 areas when it is dry enough to reach them all. The work is done for the farmers' coop in place who handles buying the medicine and the farmers paying for application. The main focus is helping the farmers have productive cattle in the tsetse infected areas. This is very helpful as it allows the farmers to farm very fertile ground that was never possible before because of the cattle becoming infected with tryps.One thing that is very interesting to me is the difference in how many cattle are treated and poured. This varies largely from person to person and especially has a trend in each area. Some farmers choose to pour all of their cattle, others choose to pour just their oxen, some pour only cattle that are sick, and others pour none and just get the treatment. With the treatment I see that some farmers choose only those that are really sick while others treat a good portion of their herd every month.I was able to assist on my two trips to Ghibe Valley the research on testing the cattle for tryps and their PCV levels. The data was collected from 23 cattle on the first trip and 23 on the second. The cattle were from the Gullele area.The process both times started with the drawing of ear vein blood. This process was started by using a lancet to puncture the vein and then using two heparinized capillary tubes to collect the blood. The tubes were filled 2/3 to ¾ full and then stuck into a tray of putty to seal the end. This was done to all of the cattle selected for the month. Once the blood had all been taken the capillary tubes were put into a centrifuge. The centrifuge was run for 5 minutes at a speed of 12,000 resolutions per minute. The next step was taking the separated blood in the tubes and measuring the PCV levels. This was done using a haemocrit reader that measured by comparing the total amount of original blood in the capillary to the separated red blood cells that are in the bottom of the capillary. After the PCV level was recorded, the slide was made for observation under the microscope. The first step to make the slide was cutting the capillary tube with a diamond pencil slightly below the Buffy coat. The Buffy coat is between the plasma and the red blood cells and where any parasites in the blood would be located as they are lighter than red blood cells, but lighter than the plasma. The plasma end of the cut tube is then tapped lightly against the slide to put the Buffy coat on it and prepare the wet slide in this way. All of the capillaries were made into blood smears no matter the PCV level, to make sure there was no tryps. The blood was then observed for either kind of trypanomiasis T. congolense or T. vivax. I was only able to see the T. congolense strain, as I will further explain in my results. Tryps is identified by the shaking or vibrations of cells.For T. congolense this is in a tight bunch of cells and does not move very far compared to T. vivax that moves away more in a line form. The results were very encouraging to see from both months. Out of both months of testing only one positive case of T. congolense was found. The average PCV level from the first month was 22.7%. The average PCV from the second month was 28.5%. The number of cattle for each PCV level is shown in the graphs below.I fell that seeing this data even though it is a very small sample is encouraging to see that the program in place to help fight against tryps is working well. Only having one animal out of the twenty three from each month test positive is quite impressive.The PCV levels rose dramatically from the first month to the second one. This comes as an obvious increase in feed availability for cattle. When we arrived in June the rainy season was late and it was just starting to rain. The landscape was full of green vegetation on our second trip as the rain had been coming since our first stay. This dramatically increased PCV values and just shows that the cattle rely on grazing for their main source of feed.One strange thing that occurred was the positive tryps case came on our second visit.This was when PCV levels were much higher and the norm is for tryps to be less prevalent in this case. However, it is possible that this case was missed or in its very early stages and difficult to detect the month before.Overall the research shows that the traps to catch the tsetse flys, the monthly pouring, and selective treatments are doing a good job to help the farmers cattle fight tryps. The cattle not having tryps is vital to the farmers so they are productive plowing the land and for reproducing. This kind of control can hopefully be developed by many areas of Ethiopia and greatly increase the productivity of all of the cattle here.The internship has truly been a life changing experience for me. I have learned much more than the research, which is what I have come to realize that this internship is all about. I feel that, to start with, the people of Ethiopia are very friendly. Everyone at ILRI was very kind to me and really took good care of me while I was here. And the friendliness does not just stop inside ILRI, but everyone in Ethiopia is courteous and helpful in every way. It has been veryinteresting just meeting random people who just wanted to meet me and visit with a foreigner.While I was in the countryside helping to pour cattle, I met a man who was an English teacher in a primary school who had run for a long ways just to meet and converse with me because he saw me pass by in the pickup. It was very interesting to me that he asked my opinion of everything and what the next steps should be to make life better for Ethiopians.One experience I had that I will never forget is being able to plow with oxen. This is the way almost all of the farmers in Ethiopia work the land, and it was really awesome to be able to partake in this. The plow is run by two oxen that are tied together with a wooden harness where the plow shaft is attached to. The plow is made up of two wood pieces to make a V and a metal point for the front. The job of the person is to hold the plow in the ground and steer where it is going while keeping the oxen going with the whip. At first this was a little difficult but after a little getting used to it I really got the hang of it. The toughest part for me was getting the oxen to turn around at the end, as they kind of just want to keep going. The first time turning them around they almost ran away from me but after a little experience I also got the hang of this.Being able to plow really gave me a deep respect for the farmers of Ethiopia as it is very time consuming and much harder work then sitting in a tractor like in the United states. But one thing I also noticed is the farmers really seem to enjoy their work and care for their oxen very well.This was a very big change for me running a 4 wheel drive tractor to a pair of oxen.The change in food was really also an experience for me. Unlike the US, where our animals are fattened before taking them to market, here the animals are rather slim and are much older. This makes the meat need much more added to it and different cooking for it to have good flavor. They often use peppers and onions to add most of the flavor along with other spices. This makes the food spicier which I was not use to at first but really came to enjoy. Also, traditionally all meals are eaten with enjera, which is like a sponge type bread in which you use your hands to pick up the food and eat it. It's frowned upon at home to eat with your hands but here it is the culture. I really enjoy this part of eating the food! Also, it is part of the culture to eat from a single large pan sharing with everyone you are with. This is really cool and just goes to show how friendly everyone is here. One last change with the food was that the portion sizes were much different than that of the US. This took some getting used to eating much less, but I see now how much more correct this is. It also brings the question to me of why we have to eat so much more than what we need in the US.A Different Kind of Experiment and the Questions It RaisesDr. Azage, through many talks at the Zebu club, has also helped me put a different view on my internship. This was to think of myself as an experiment in a way through the adventure of coming to Ethiopia. It is actually a very interesting way at looking at it as it shows everyone in my family and community that it is not as bad as people really think it is. As an example for the first two weeks my stomach was a little queasy from the food and water differences, but it is not like I didn't survive. It can really show that maybe everything that we are doing in the United States to reduce all the bacteria in our food and water isn't always a good thing. Maybe we are just weakening our immune systems to the point that with one little bit of bacteria we get sick.There are also many things that have been able to take away that can only come from looking in from the outside. It has really opened my mind up that things you do anywhere in the world affects everything else. With global warming putting great changes to the climates of many developing countries, it really shows that many people's abuse of fossil fuels has made it tough for people who rely on the rain for drinking water, crops, livestock, and, in Ethiopia, electricity. So it just really makes me also think of the question of if we are living sustainable lives and thinking of future generations. It is interesting to think about and something that we can look to places like Ethiopia who have been around for a very long time for some possible advice.This internship has truly been a lifetime experience in which I have learned so much not only about research but all of the differences in a developing country. It has shown me so much that will stay with me for the rest of my life. I hope that someday I will be able to come back and give back to the people of Ethiopia for everything they have given me."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3591827978.json b/main/part_2/3591827978.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12a1271e620a75fb09e413c18dc8fb03ea173ed5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3591827978.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7ef0b2e01cb48a777dd4034d3dfe58ec","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2086c4d7-3cb4-41da-8e2e-04de7b4291fa/retrieve","id":"-1699882586"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"71317ef9-ee8d-4c5b-afa0-fa663a45510b","content":"In phase III, NCRE has provIded on-the-Job, advanced degree, and short courc;e trammg to IRA staff 10 the HIghlands Maize Breedmg Umt To the credIt of IRA,they have all remamed 10 the untt dfter theIr trammg The two most semor breeders, Jacob Eta-Ndu and NdlOro a Mbd\\\\d, hdve completed M Sc degrees 10 plant breedmg dt the Umverslty of Mmnesota (USA), dnd Mr Eta-Ndu IS currently workmg on a Ph D at the same msntutlOn The thrrd SCIentist, hldore T ABI, was tramed at lIT A m hybnd maIze germplasm m 1991, and m phytogenetIc rec;sources m 1992 Three techmctan cycle graduates from RegIOnal college of Agnculture, Lucas Fofe, Albert Nde and George Fotaw, Jomed the umt m 1990Albert Ndea and Fofe Lucas have been to IITA, where they have been tramed m maIze technology transfer, dnd maIze streak VIruS reSIstance screenmg respecnvelyIn additIon to on-the-Job trammg of the above mennonned staff, five BambUI stanon workers assIgned to the umt hdve become speclahzed m the dcnVInes of the maize breedmg progrdm, and form dn mtegrdl palt of the staff Of parucular specIalIzation, are John Mbossl for hIS management of fIeld operanons, and Benard Wankt for hIS management of seed stocks 2 1 6 PRIORITIES FOR FUTURE RESEARCH Future progress m the program WIll directly depend on avaIlable operanon funds and the qualIty of umt mdnagement The HIghland Malze-Breedmg Umt should seek for new operdtIOn tund\\ no\"\" that the NCRE Project hd~ phased out Sub progrdm pflOlltles dre hsted below by order of retention from mlmmal to opnmal fundmg levels vmety MdmtendD(,e VanetIec; bemg produced and dlc;trIbuted to farmer\\ must be mdmtamed and foundation seed delIvered to the \\eed producer~ edch year SelectIOn pre~~ure must be mdmtdmed to aVOId genetic ill Itt m dgI onomlC chdfacten~tIcs, ~uch as matunty, plant heIght, lodgmg, husk cover, and gram texture A~ a pnoflty, one vanety m each major category should be mamtamed Ldte whIte, edlly whIte, ldte yellow and edrly yellow for the mIddltltude, and one white or mixed color tor the hIgh altitude zone AddltIonal varIeties WIth specIal charactenstIcs (short plant type, speCific adaptIon to aCid or ferule conditIon, etc ) can be mamtamed as resources permit Small quantities of these varlenes hdve been sent to lIT A and CIMMYT for long-term stordge Streak ~(,feenmg fdclhtIe~ Tbe roofing system of the screen houses should be re-bUllt m accordance With Foumbot environmental condItions The umt Will therefore stIll rely on outside cooperdtIOn to Implement ItS streak VlruC; reM stant germplasm development program Population Improvement Open polhndted populatlOn~, \\uch as POpuldtIOn 32, populdtIon 43 SR, EMSR and ATP, which serve d c; V dfletIe~ or ~ourcec; of varIeties, can be Improved at d taster r dte than * * HIgh gram YIeld potentlal Days to maturIty Gram color and texture ReSIstance to dIsease and pest (streak, borer, strIga) Tolerance to abrotlc stresses(drought, aCId-SOlI, Zn defiCIency) Gratn quahty(sweetness, soft and hard endosperm) * Low ba~lC yleld~ Averdge giaIn Yleld\\ In \\mdll -~c..dle farmer dre between 300 and 500 kg/hd Ev(.n If fungiCide applKatlOn could double thl'i Yield, the re~ult would not be ewnomK * * DIfticultIe~ m obtllnmg fungIcIdes and appit<..atIon machmery, and theIr hIgh (..Q~t tor small-~cale farmers Auteur (s)The Hlghldnd Maize BreedIng Umt, though not ~dtI\\fied m the hlghldnd zonell, hds fulfilled Its goals m the mid-dltItude zones dS te~tIfied by the relea~e of 5 open-polltndted and 4 hybnd vdnetIe~ The Umt feels frustrdted by the deldy~ trought by NCRE ddmml\\trdtlOn on the wmdmg up operatIOns e~pecldlly d\\ regdrds the nur\\ery, trdmmg fdrmerll dnd extenllion workers by the Umt, dS well dS genetic ~toc..h pre~ervdtIOnThe 1991, 1992 and 1993 U oppmg sea~on\\ were ~U( .. {,e\\\\fully conducted With more emphJ\\I\\ on bleedIng Over the yedl\\, the tllah wen . . hafv(,..\\ted dnd datd dnalyzed In Ndop pldIn IR7167 -33 -2 -3 dnd TaX 3145 -33 -2 -4 were the mo~t preferred vmeues Other Vdfleues suc..h as CI~dddne, ITA 212, ITA 222, CICA 8 dnd TaX 3145 -33-2-3 dre actually under culuvatton In We~t dnd North We\\t Provmces In Magd, IT A 212, AD 9246 are pO\"'~lble ~ub~utute~ of IR 46 In the North, ITA 257, dIld IRAT 112 dre the outstdndmg upldnd/ramted Vdneue~ while ITA 300 I~ progre%lvely repldc..Ing BKN 7033 -33 -3 -3 -2 -2 -3 under IrrIgated conditIons Cereals Agronomy DUflng the last 3 years (1991 -1993) the re~earc..hers of Ceredh Agronomy Umt have conducted more thdn 34 dgronOiTIlc.. field tndh on mdlze, ~orghum dnd d~~oudted (..fOpS on statIOn and m farmers' fields m the three Provmces Pdrticularly m the subhumld lowland savanna m North Cdmeroon Some tec..hmcdl paper~ dnd two compendlUm~ of dgronomlc rewmmendduons for mdlze and ~orghum hdve been prepdred Many tr dmIng field\\ ddYs, extenslOn agents and farmers have been orgamzed Much techmcal aSIlI ... tance to several agncultural agencIes and farmers hd\\ been proVIded Sorghum BreedmgDunng the last three years of NCRE project, the Sorghum dnd Millet Re~edc..h Umt set Its mdm obJec..uve to breed for VdflOU~ ~tre ... s tolerdnce, Improve 10Cdl germplasms and eVdludte IntrodUctions and advdnced ~egregatIng matefldl~ Work conduc..ted dccordmg to this plan led to encouragmg re~ults Some ~orghum and mIllet vanetIes were found to be very performdnt m terms of yIeld, agronomic trdltS and/or ~tre ...... factorsMany forage legume ~pec..le~ grew too ~lowly or did not acc..ummuldte enough blOIDdSS to be conSidered d~ cover c..rop~ Ca~~ta stamea dnd pigeon ped hedgerow II Cdn be a ~ustamdble croppmg ~y~tem Smga control pac..kage ... hould be directed to reduc..e Smga seedbdnk m the SOlI Momtonng of the ~Oll mOisture m Muskwdfl sorghum IIhould be gIven high pnonty Many goals, mcludmg trdmmg, were dc..comph~hed dunng the contract penod ot the TA BambUI TLUThe TestIng and LIaIlion Umt at BambUII~ respon~Ible for farmIng systems research In the Western HIghlands of CdmelOon, WIth dn emphd~l~ on mdIze and nee based croppmg systems From 1991 to 1993, sIgnIficdnt progrelis WdS made toward aChIeVIng thiS goal WIth the generation ot farmer recommendatIOns for sustaInable agnculture, soIl fertIlIty and chardctenzatIOn, mdlze dnd nce bUilt around new high YieldIng varietIes (kd~al, ATP, Synth 3 & 4, HAP, Eddy White dnd mdlze Hybnd\\, dnd the TOX rIce vdnette~) thdt have been released and are bemg ddapted by large numbers of fdrmers Ekond TLUThe focu~ of re~edrch Wd~ on lOn~trdmt dldgno~I~, IdentIficdtIOn of bIOloglldl technologIes for ImproVIng SOli fertIlIty and for weed control, IdentIficatIOn of approprIate crop protectIOn practIces, dlssemIndtIon of Improved well adapted crop varletIe~ and other technologies d~ well d~ mOnItonng technologIes DISSemIndtIOn of technologies IS the proJect's future re~earch focus Maroua TLU WIth les\\ need for ddditIondl dIdgnO~tIC ~tudles, on-fdrm te~t re~ul~ over 1991-93 POInt to promISIng technologIes on Improved sorghum/cowpea associdtIon~, SOlI mOl~ture conservation, the use of legumInOus trees In a~soclatIOn WIth crop~ and Improved cowpea storage techmques There I~ eVIdence thdt certun varietIeli of sorghum, cowped, peanut and mdize are bemg ddopted by fdlIncr~ AdoptIOn dnd n . . \\t,drlh Impdct ~tudle~ dre urgently needed to gUIde future re~edrch directIonliOverdll, we hdve made some good progress towards solVIng some of the key soIlrelated constraInts In our zone of serVIce These were mtrogen defiCiency dnd low phosphorus avalldblltty to crop~ due to ~Oll aCidIty dnd fixation We explored the u~e of organIC dmendments and hme to dddreli\\ the~e problem~ Our Impre~slon wa~ that the green manures supplIed more nItrogen dnd le~~ pho~phoru\\ but dId enhdnce the dVdIlabIltty of fertIlIzer phosphorus to crops In aud ~Olls The green mdnure crops whIch ~howed promIse In thIS re~pect were Mucuna, Crotaiana, Canavahd, Tephrosla The green manure crops performed poorly m the highly degrdded ~Olh (high In exchdngedble Al dnd low bdMC cations), dnd were not effective d\\ \\011 ImplOVer\\ Und<...r ~uch condltlon~, \\tJrter mdnUrIng was recommended Callwndra was be~t for dgrofore~try followed by Leucaena dnd Cassw By didIng HUtIdl growth of Leucaeua WIth ~tdrter mdnUll. . . . , It Ii performdnce WdS compardble With that of Callwndra The ddvdntdge of u~mg Leuwena I~ thdt It 1\\ pI eWClou~ Ca.Hw toler dted the dry season better than the rest but It IS a non-mtrogen fixer and therefore, there I~ d tendency for It to deplete sod N If the bIOmd~s IS exported out of the field for other u~e~ A lblZla , Erythrtna and Mellma performed poorly m the North-west Hlghldnds The UnIt's role wa~ extended to mclude coordmdtIon of Peace Corps, NGOs and farmer group~ mvolved In agroforestry dnd related green manunng research and extenslOn activIties ndtlOnwide Over 25 fdrmer groups m the South-West, North-West and West provmce~ were reached WIth our proposed mterventlOns Our package for demonstratIOn consI~ted of 1) Green Manure! Agrofore~try (GM! AF) WIth NPK fertIlIzer, 2) GM! AF WIthOUt NPK fertIlIzer and 3) control WIthOUt GM! AF and no NPK Crotalana dnd Mucuna featured mo~t In the~e demon~tratIon~ because they were more stable In terms of bIOmass production than the other speCIes Our protocol and expenence were shared With the TLUs m Gdroua, Maroua and Ekona Plant Pathology PPB contmued to Identify, locdlIze, dnd to mOnItor the major dI\\ea'\\ec;; of sorghum, mIllet and mdlze m Cdmeroon Though le~s dttentIon Wd~ gIven to \\orghum, mIllet emphdslzes were placed on s(.reenmg mdize genotypes from theIr re~l~tdnce to the mdJor pathogens (Exerohllum tunuum, Puc-clma polysora, Sponsonum reZwna) Varieties such as CHC 201 (Kasal), Syn 4, COCA, CMS 8704, EC 571, ATP were tolerant to the~e dISea~e\\ Though the personnel remdmed very lImIted, financIdl dnd technIcal '\\upport to the umt WdS hetter than m NCRE I dnd NCRE II More \\(.reenmg te(.hnIque\\ need to he Identlfed Funds WIll he our major challenge We hope to IdentIfy ~ource~ of tinan(.e~Dunng the perlOd m reVIew, the maJor maIze m\\e(.t storage pests In the We~tem HIghldnds were Identified and the lo~\\e~ asso(.lated WIth at led~t tour populdf maIze storage method~ ds~e~~ed through on-~tdtlOn expenment~ Two new grdm ~torage m~ectIcides (SOFAGRAIN and SUMUCOMBI) plu~ two old one~ (Actelhc and Permethnn) were ~creened and ~pe(.lal reports mdudmg findmg~ dnd relOmmendatlOn~ were (\"Ir<..ulated The use of natural plant matenals by pea~ant farmers for ~tored gram protectIon was Identified to he fdirly popular m many part~ of the Western HIghldnd~ and ~tudles to Improve and mcrea~e theIr use are underway RKe field entomology receIved a fdir attentlOn followmg 1 1 IN I RODUC110N fhe AdmlOl..,tratlon Untt con'mt<; of the Chief of Party, Deputy ChIef of Party, Admlnt\"tt dtlve Qlficer, and vanou<; \"upport <;taff The goal of the AdmlOl\\tratlOn Untt 1<; to en<;ure achievement of project ob1ectlve\", The ddmlnt\",tratlon'.., mo..,t Important ta<;k 1<; a\"\"t<;tlOg re..,earcher\", to accomp1t<;h the proJect'.., re<;earch and 1O-<;ervKe trdmmg ohjectIves Tht\" entdtl\", admlnt<;tratIve \"upport to re<;earcher<; for hou<;mg, travel arrangement<; and nece..,<;ary formalttle<; wtth the Government of Cameroon, procurement of nece<;..,ary \",upphes and eqUIpment, management and dt<;hur'>ement of project fund..\" and hmng and supervlSlng ,>upport pcr..,onnel A parttcular re\"'pon<;thtltty of the Chief of Party I' > to revIew re<;earch work plan'>, method\" and find1l1g<; m order to emure good performance of the techntcal a\"''>t\"tance team and con<;t<;tency WIth project ohJecttve\" Another Important functIOn of the Admlnt\",trcltlon Untt I' > mamtatnmg ltal<;on among the <;pon<;onng organt7attOn\" IRA, lIT A and USAID In thl<; regard, the admml..,trattOn en<;ures tImely and proper preparatIOn of project reportmg document<;, mcludmg annual work plan<; and progle..,s reports The admml<;tratlOn also developed re<;earch and techmcal management procedure<; whIch not only meet project reqUlrement<; but hopefully can serve a<; model<; for future u\",e by IRA Long term trammg and procurement are two batson and support acttVltlC<; whIch took Ie<;<; tIme than m the pa<;t A <; the project near<; Its end, !flcrea<;mg amount'> of tIme are bemg devoted to en<;unng ..,mooth tramltlOn after phase out of lIT A <;taff and publicatIon and dl\",,,,emtnatlOn of project findtng.., 1 2 OBJECTIVES Durmg the fir<;t 10 year<; of project actlVttle<; the admml<;tratlOn concentrated on addition of progr,lm.., ,Ind \\trc,lmltnmg (H.hmnl\\tt.ltlvc proCC(\\IIIC\\ fOl ,10 II1lful<;mg numher of techntcal \\taff DUTIng the 1991-94 penod empha<;l<; wa<; placed on pha\",mg out expatnate ..,taff and the t.lkeover of eXI<;ttng program.., by IRA re<;earchet.., A major tocus of thl<; penod wa<; to pha..,e out expdtnate\\ dnd hand over re'>earch program~ to ndtlonal re..,earcher<; Another objectIve wa~ to coordlOated program budget'> wtth the pha<;e out plan and WIth IRA objectIves Program work plan<; and report<; were modIfied to be compatlhle WIth IRA plan<; and report<; A <;econd major focu<; wa<; to extend re<;earch re\\u1t\\ to the exten\\lon ..,ervlce ThIS was to he accomplIshed pnmdnly through mdlvldual plogram field ddy~ and demon<;tratlOns The role of the admml\\Uatlon wa~ to develop a <;ene<; of puhlt..,hed pamphlet<; and bulletms outltntng exendlble re<;earch re..,ulto;Long term trammg wa\\ d third major objectIve WIth the provI..,lOn of fundI, for 12 graduate degree \"tudent<; Becau~e the project wa<; scheduled to end, theo;e o;cholar<;hlps were proVIded WIth the ltmltdtlOn that all <;tudent<; had to be fim'>hed and returned to Cameroon before December 31, 1994 Therefore all trammg actlvltle.., had an eo;pectally hard deadhne to meet 1 ..The penod 1991-1993 was dn especIally stressful penod for N CRE researchers and admInIstratIon Dunng thIS penod the project actively ~tarted to \"phase-out\" expatriate Techmcal AssIstants and to reduce project financIal support to levels Judged to be sustaInable by IRA AddItional stress came from pen OdIC strIkes due to polItical unrest and lack of IRA salary payments The reductIOn of the IRA operatIOnal budget caused many other programs to reduce or halt theIr research actiVIties It IS a trIbute to the IRA Cereals and FarmIng Systems researchers that theIr actIVItIes were not severely affected by these problems 1 4 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Phase out of ExpatrIate Staff A total of 15 expatrIate <;taff were Involved WIth NCRE dunng thI<; pha<;e of project actiVItIes Although a few staff left earher than planned the transItion to IRA researcher management went smoothly There was no apprecIable change In umt actIVIties other than that normally be expected by loss of an researcher Both the quahty and quantIty of research performed has remaIned hIgh ReturnIng IRA researchers have been able to easdy take over the leadershIp and admInIstrative roles of therr respectIve umts They have assumed all actiVItIes IncludIng management of expendItures, supervlSlon of field actIVItIes, management of research eqUIpment and use of vehIclesDunng the 1991-93 penod the project depended entIrely on a computenzed Inventory system to keep trJck of over 5000 Item~ valued at $'2 6 mIllIon In ~even IRA stat]on~ In Cameroon YeMly venficatIOns were made of all Items WIth SIgnature of Inventory by the responsIble researcher NCRE ImtIated a purchaSIng sub-contract WIth WInrock InternatIOnal to handle all mternatIonal purchasmg Dunng the peflod of thIS contract (2 years) 50 purchase orders were Issued With a value of more than $700,000 Included In thIS total were 22 computer~ and 27 vehIcles for project use All International purchasmg was completed In 1992As each expatnate staff left the IRA researcher concerned assumed responsIbIlIty for the eqUIpment and ~upphes of the program OwnershIp of these Items was then formally transferred from USAID to IRA and removed from the project mventoryAt the begInmng of 1991 there were 7 students studyIng In the USA and Nigefla All these students were supervIsed by a USAID sub-contractor, PIET, In the USA All but one of these 7 students successfully completed theIr programs of study and returned to IRA In Cameroon dunng the 1991-94 peflod One contInued to a PhD program under Wlnrock of these 7 student~ ~ucceo;\\ful1y completed theIr programs of o;tudy and returned to IRA m Cameroon dunng the 1991-94 penod One contmued to a PhD program under Wmrock supervIsIOn An addItIOnal 2 students were enrolled at umversltles m the USA and Nlgena under drrect USAID finanCIng durmg 1991-94 Both have ~mce returned to Cameroon and resumed theIr posh mIRA In 1991 NCRE wa\\ gIVen re~pons]bIltly for long term trammg A sub-contract was awarded to Wmrock InternatIOnal for supervl~lon of students m the USA ApphcatIOn for \\cholar~hlps wa~ lImited to IRA re~earcher~ who had collaborated WIth NCRE for at lea<;t two year~ Successful candidates were nommated by a committee of IRA and NCRE T As accordmg to defmed U Itena Fmal nommatlons were made by the Mlmster of MESlRES A total of 12 scholar<;hlps were awarded Aft caIldldates surcessfully apphed to, and were dccepted to umvefl~ltle\"l In the USA Each student wa\"l supervIsed by Wmrock InematlOnal from theIr arnval to theIr departure from the USA At the orne of thIS report all were progres~mg well With then pi ogr dm\\In 1993 a prolect technIcd.l paper databa<;e wa\\ estabhlihed at Nkolblsson Thlli attempted to colku In d lentl al file at lea\\t one paper copy of all techmcal report\\, conference present ItHln\\, reteH.cd IOUfI1dl drtlcle<; dnd progfdm report~ wnteen by NCRE \\taft counterpart\\) or N( HI-' \\upervl\\ed ... tudent~ Over 350 papers are hsted and over 300 are currently In fileli Pldn\\ dre bemg made to mIcrofilm the entIre collectIon and dIstribute It to hbrane ... In CUlluoon dnd We~t Afnca Thl~ collectIOn WIll be handed over to the IRA/IRZV hbrary for catalogmg and regIstratIOn A condensed hstmg of the tItles appear<; m the appendIX of thIo;; report 1 5 CONSULT ANTS Dr Y Jeon VISIted Cameroon to ~tart a post-harvest processmg m]ttatIve between lIT A and IRA He Jomed a USAID sponsored group that vIsIted all regIOns of the country to evaluate the need for post-harvelit research or extenSIOn He liubsequently formed a proposal for backlitoppmg the IRA post-harvest processmg program HIS propol)al wa<; The HIghlands MaIze Breedmg UnIt IS responsIble for the development of vaneue~ adapted to Improved and current farmmg systems between lOOOm and above the meJn sea level The target zones are maInly found m the North West, West and Adamaoua Provmce~ and mclude a large range of soIl types and farm SIzes The Western HIghlands, compnsmg the North West and West Provmces, cover less than 10% of the land area m Cameroon, but contam 25 % of the populatIOn, and produces over 60 % of the natIOnal maIze cropThe purpolie of thIS report IS to summarIze the actIvItIes and results of the HIghland MaIze Breedmg Program dunng Phase III (1991III ( -1994) ) of the NatIonal Cereals Research and ExtenSIOn Project (NCRE)The goal of the UnIt dunng thIS penod was to develop a comprehensIve breedmg program mcludmg both open pollInated and hybnd vanetIes Dunng phase III, the UnIt has emphaSIzed the testmg of Its germplasm WhIch was able to prOVIde new vanetIes A maIze ~treak VIruS screenmg faCIlIty was mstalled m 1991 at Foumbot and a new seed processmg and storage facIhty was put mto operatIon m Apnl, 1993 at the headquarter of the umt at BambUI statIOn c> ThIS penod was charactenzed by mcreasmg budgetary constramts, and the normal work schedule was often dIsturbed by IRA workers stnkes and soclO-polItIcal agItatIOns Smce the departure of the T A Breeder m October 1992, the program IS currently bemg led by NatIOnal Counterparts One of them, I Tabi was transferred to Foumbot SIte In late 1992 2 1 2 OBJECTIVES The ObjectIves of the HIghland MaIze Breedmg Umt dunng phase III were 1)Develop maIZe vaneties (open pollInated and hybnd) WhICh meet the requrrements of farmers and the demands of the market In the Cameroon HIghlands 2)EstablIsh germplasm development strategIes WhIch wIll cyclIcally Improve the vanetd] and lme sources whIle producmg a stream of new vanetIes 3)Mamtam and proVIde foundatIon seed of released vaneties to the ~eed mu]tIplIcatIOn and dIstnbutIOn orgamzatlOn~ 4)Tram counterpart SClentllits through an mtegrated program of on the Job expenence alternated WIth U S graduate degree studIes and InternatIOnJI Re~earch Center~ short courses 5)Tram techmuJm through on the Job expenence or short course~ 2 1 3 CONSTRAINTS Constramts encountered dunng thI~ phase may be classIfied as follow Operatmg Fundc;A cnSlS m operatmg funds WhICh occurred m late 1986 contmued dunng phase III Consequently, 50% reductIOn m the number of locatIOns and plot SIze\", uc;ed for trlalc; was necessary to overcome vanous budget cutsThe two screen hou~es mstalled at Foumbot m 1991 were already out of use m 1992 due to the meltmg of the plastic roof at the contact POInt WIth the Iron frame The drymg and storage factlitIec; are not fully functIOnal at BambUI ~tatton Only one tractor IS at thIS pomt operational dt BamhUl StdtlonThe major mId and hIgh altitude maIze growmg area~ were not well represented The Adamaoua Plateau, one of our most Important SItes, was completely cancelled m 1993 For the HIgh altitude zone (> 1500m) only one SIte was avaIlable vanetal Constramts Vanetal constramts IdentIfied through the Testmg and LIaI~on Umt (TLU) mdlcated a need for the followmg -Late matunng, whIte and yellow flInty gram vanetIec; wIth hIgh Yield and Improved strorablhty -Early matunng, whIte and yellow flmty gram vanetIes, -VanetIes resIstant to poor envIronments (aCId soIls), -Hybnds for medIUm and large farm scales 2 1 4 ACCOMPLISHMENTS A comprehensIve breedmg sy\",tem of germplasm Improvement, vanety formation, and vanety testIng, was well mtegrated m the program ThIS sy~tem mcludec; multIlocatlOnal evaluation, both dunng germplasm Improvement and final vanety testmg Only two HIghland Provmces out of three were mcluded m the te~tmg m 1993, North-West and West Provmces Dunng phd\\e III (1991)(1992)(1993)(1994) c;everal open-pollInated varIetIes confirmed theIr potential as releac;able vanetIe~ m the mId-altItude zones 1 he hybnd program has re~ulted m good and producIhle c;mgle cro~s vanetIe~ WIth a hIgh YIeld potentIal for medIUm and large scale farmers A c;et of good mbred hnes has been regIstered and new promI\",mg ones were Identified and tested The be\\t one~ are avaIlable at breeder's level for release PopulatIOn Improvement contmued m mtroduced source populatIonc; whKh ~erve as sources of mbred hnes for hybnd and c;ynthetK vanetIe~IdentIfy and develop sourc.e populatIons, Improve and convert populatIons through selectIon and recombmatlOn were the objectives of the germplasm Improvement program PopulatIOn 32, Population 43SR and EMSR have been u\\ed as Improved ~ources of new mbred lmes for vanetal and hybnd formatIon WhIle the source populatIOn possess Important charactenstIcs (e g good plant type and flmty whIte gram for populatlOn 32, and earlmess for EMSR) on whIch future progress c.an be based, budgetary constramts hffilted the effort that could be made on theIr Improvement SubstantIal progres'\\ wa~ made WIth the maIze streak VlfUS vanetIe~ Improvement Convelted vd.netIe~ (Co('d.-SR, KASAI-'iR, SYNTHETIC 3-SR, ATP-SR, SYNTHETIC 4-W-SR, SYNTHETIC 4-Y-SR and Early WhIte-SR) proved to be better or equal to theIr non SR counterparts, and therefore would normally replace them Unfortunately, the SR genes mcorporated mto these varIeties appears unfitted to the highland ecology ot Cameloon due to the high stredk mCIdence ob~erved on the SR matenal when grown under heavy IItreak VIruS dIsease pressure Streak resIstant screenmg under artIfiCial mfestatlOn, planned for 1993 was not Implemented due to detenoratIon of screen houses at Foumbot Nevertheless, the best EMSR SI hnes were selected and recombIned as donors of the SR and earhne~~ genes through a S I famIly evaluatIOn and selectIOn proce~s m order to Improve the Early WhIte SR PopulatIOn Two collectIOns of local germplasm were evaluated at mId-altItude and mgh altItude level at Babungo (lIOOm) and Mblyeh (200m) respectIvely None of the locally collected germplasm was dedared satIsfactory at mid-altItude level At the high altItude locatIOn of Mblyeh where yIeld, earhness and resistance to Phaeosphena ~p were the major tral~ under selectIon, two local vanetles (Ndu White and Nkambe I-whIte) were selected for theIr good YIeld performanc.e and dIsealle reactIon SpeCIalty maIze Vartetles were also under hmlted Improvement From a small program of U U pop corn converSIOn to mId-altItude adaptatIOn, three mbred hnes (128, SG32, SG1533) were ~elected to form smgle hybnd combInatIons and a pop corn synthetIc vanety A small program In sweet com conversIOn to mId-altItude adaptatIon contInued MSR-Sh, a very sweet type WIth poor germmatIon was Improved through germmatlOn tests The MSR-Su type has good gernunatIOn but IS less sweet MSR-Su hnes were selfed and selected for mmlffium gram ')tJrch content Suhsequent cro'\\\\es With soft endosperm matenal, planned for 1994, should IInproved the graIn quality VanetIes TestmgThe obJec.tIve~ were to IdentIty well adapted varKtIe~ for relea~e to fd.fmer~ or potentIal seed growers, and to test and assess mtroduced matenal The open-pollinated vanety tnals were a contmuatIon of the ITIld-altItude NatIonal Vanety Tnals (NVT) reconstItuted annually m Cameroon They were dIVIded mto an Early Set (NVT-MAE) and a late set (NVT-MAL)In the mId-altItude zone, trIals were sown at Foumbot (lOOOm), Nfonta (1300m), Babungo (llOOm) TlbatI (100m) and Mbang Mblml (llOOm) The NVT-hlgh altItude tnals sown at Mblyeh (2000m) and Upper Farm (2000m) Mbang MbIrm, TibatI and Upper farm were discarded In 1993 croppmg seasonIn NdtIonal Vanety Mid-dititude Late tnah, eIghteen vanete~ were te'>ted dunng three year~ over a total of 9 locatIOns Synthetic 4 and A TP confirmed theIr potentialItIes as releasable varIeties The splIt yellow dnd white verslOn~ of Syn 4-SR baSically had the same performance a~ the ongmdl Syn 4 populatIOn, sugge~tmg thdt the genetic ba~e of the populatIOn was not dltered hy COlO1 ~epdrdtIon KASAI-SR, ATP-SR, SYN4-SR-Y, SYN4-SR-W are the suggested open poll mated recommenddtlOns for mId-altItude zones, If no obJectIon~ come from Te~tmg dnd LIdI~on, dnd Pathology Umh In wmphdnce WIth the new Vdnety nammg ~y\\tem m the hlghldnd\\, they Will be known to publIc d~ CHC 201, CHC 202, CHC 203, and CHC 204 respectIvely m the pamphlets In aud and pho\\phorus fixmg sod like Nfontd, ATP-SR and COCA-SR would be the best alternattves to the Syn 4 verSlOns The mean gram yIeld~ of major vanette~ over three year\\ are pre\\ented m Table 1 The vanetles exhIbIted an appreciable level of ~tabIhty WIth respect to major traIts hke days to 50% Mlk, eM height dnd YIeld 1 he tindl del.lMon on whdt to lhoo\\e would then rely on agronomlc traIts hke plant a~pects, dnd ear rot scores bdsed on the plevalhng envlronmental condlttonsThe NatIOnal Vanety M Id-dltltude Edrly Wd\\ InltIatld In 1990 to te\\t the earlme~s, YIeld and adaptatton of Early WhIte and Edlly MSR In companson WIth the reledsed varlettes BACOA and KASAl The ~treak. re~I'>tant ver~Ions of KASAl and EW were Included In 1992 and 1993 respectively Re~ult~ confirm the supenonty of KASAI-SR (CHC 201) Early Whlte was not sIgmficantly edrlIer thdn KASAI-SR Haif-sih recurrent ~electIon to lmprove earliness of the EW continue,> a'> well a~ other charactenstIc'> such as ear al)pect and ear rot The commercldh7ed PIOneer hyhnd (PHB 141,)) would not be d hetter alternative to KASAI-SR because of It~ weakne~1) on hu\\k cover dnd ear rot NYT -HA Of the two High dltItude 10ldtlOn~ orW Mblyeh wa\\ operdtlOndl In 1993 Entne~ In the trlals were the tollowlng Vdnou~ cydes of the lilgh Altitude POpuldtlon (HAP), Pool 9 Synthettc, Ndu LOCdl, COld, Syn 4, dnd d LOCdl lheck YIeld, edrhne\\\\ dnd resl\\tdnce to Phaeosphaena I)p were the mdJor trdlt\\ under selectton Results In Tahle 3 \\ugge~ted a hIgh Inudence of Phaeo<;phena maydls, but that all the tested vanetlel) With the exception of HAP Co I)how d good level of tolerdnce to the dlsease The 10Cdi check outYlelded the be~t Improved entry HAP ~, IndlCdtlng that, there would be no need to rewmlm . . nd dn Improved VdrIety dt Mblyt.h But, thl\\ being one year and one slte resulh, no '>trong eOndUl)lOn could be drdwn from It Inbred Tnd 1 ) Inbred trl(i1~ were ~own dt two locdtton~ (Foumhot dnd Bdhungo) In 1992 dnd 1993 All the mbted hne~ Identltied d\\ good pdrenb tor hyhnd ~t..ed production helve confirmed their potenttal as releasable materIals The followmg mbred lInes are avaIlable at Breeder's level fOf release 87016, 88069, 88094, 88099, 89182 89258, M111, 90323, 89274, Z28 and 90219 It IS Important to note that mbred hnes are most of the ttme sIte specIfic (LocatIOn x VarIety mteractton slgmficant at P < 005) and seed productIOn ~hould take It mto conslderatton If the opercltlOn needs to be feasIbleResults mdlcated that thl~ program has bred hIgh YIeldmg hybnds WIth good agronomIc and gram charactensttcs 88069 x 87036, 88094 x 90219,89258 x 89182, 88094 x M 131, and 88094 x 87036 smgle cross hybnds have confirmed thelf performance m the mldaltttudes The productton mformatton wIll soon be aVailable m pamphlets under the names CRR 101, CHH102, CRH 103, CHH 104 and CHH 105 respecttvely Nevertheless, new mbred hnes from the 1991 test-cro .... .;eC) showed high performance m croC)seC), but theIr stabIlIty sttU needs to be confirmed before they could be recommended Considermg the locatton x mteractton, CHH 105 would be recommended for Ndop Plams only, due to Its good and (.on~tdnt pcrtormdnte m thdt dl edLIght TZ (t1mt) from lIT A and 6 IRA mbred~ (noury) were eV£1luated for thelf reacttons to rust (Pucclma polysora) and (Exerohllzum turclcum) Forty eIght crosses (floury x flmt) from these hnes were realIzed and evaluated m a prelurunary trial SIX mbreds (230,2096,2097,5012,9499,9613) were tolerant to rust, 5 mbreds (74,230,9432,9499,9613) were tolerant to bhght InbredC) 9431, 9499, and 230 were tolerant to both dIseases Cro~s (9432 x 273) outYlelded all the others crosse~ WIth 5 3t1ha compared to Kasal 49 tlha WhICh was uC)ed £1\\ check The IdentIfitdtlOn of lowldnd mhredC) tolerant re~lstdnt to P polychang, Sdntc..hou and Ndop (T dble 2) Seven dIfferent varIetIes and three check vanetIes (IRATI 0, T AINAN V and ANNA 2) were utIlIzed -Effect of NItrogen nutntIon on the mCIdence of the pyncultuna ThIS study was composed of SIX dIfferent levels of mtrogen apphed under Irngated conditIon'i at SantchouThe resultdTh mdlcdte The Fnedman's te'it ~howed that thele were no MgmfKdnt dlfference'i between mtrogen leveb tor leveb of dttdlk Thl~ wnfirmed the cld\\SltkatlOn of the vdflctIes from most to led~t reslstdnt over dll mtrogen levels The V4 (CI'iadanc) appears to be the most reSIstant whtle V5 (CICA 8) IS the mo~t SUSleptIble to tobdr pynwlana (table 5 The re~ul~ obtdmed for the dttdlk of nelk hId\\t (tdble 6) dre not dndlogOlJ\\ to tho'ie of the leaves The mfluence of the dIfferent rate'i of mtrogen on mfectlOn are not dearly demonstr dted on the neck ThIS makes us belIeve that thele I~ not only a dIfference of senMtIvlty among vaietIes but also, a vanabilIty of the vIrulence of the Pynculturana oryzea III the field or the cultural cycle The second cycle, the penod of thIS test, IS not favorable to the dIsease Based on these results there does not appear to be a relation between YIelds and ffitrogen applIcatIOn levels on one hand and between the observations of attack and YIeld losses, on the other hand Fungicidal control of nce dlsea<;es IS effectIve and economIc when u~ed hy nce production autonttes such as SEMRY, SODERIM and UNVDA It IS u~ed hy hlg farmers 10 agnculturally advanced countrIes, where It ha<; been widely adopted In any way the research should aIm to select the chemical to be u~ed, the approplate time and method of apphcatIon of these chemmlcals In order to gIve an an~wer to thelle questlonll, many chemIcal trIals have been conducted at Mho PlaIn durIng 1991-1993 agrIcultural campagn Some of the~e are One ~et of on-farm tnals mvolvIng N fertIhzatIOn and mInimum ullage was conducted dunng the 1991 croppIng ~eason The maIn obJecuves of these expenments were a) to determIne the response of maIze to dIfferent N feruhzer rate~ under a IDlnImUm ullage system In 13 farmers' field ... located In the West and South-East Benoue regIOn~, b) to evaluate the performance of the newly avaIlable maIze vanety CMS-S704 In dIfferent agroecoiogical zones under farmers' condluon, <..) to Introduce a sy~tem of ally croppIng With pIgeon pea hedgrows In farmers fields ThiS study show among other thmgs that -Growth of maize variety CMS-S704 was relatively good In most location~ Thl~ vanety ~eem~ll adapted In the~e dlfterent agroecologlcal zones Furthermore, thiS expenment demonstrated once more that a reasonable Yield can be obtdmed In farmers' field~ under a minImum tIllage sy~tems In the subhumld lowland savanna ot North Cameroon RegardIng the 4!ley croppIng sy~tems u~ed In thl~ expenment, pigeon pea growth was con~ldcred ... atI~tac..tory when planted earher In June Results are m Table 1 4412On-farm test!DemonstratlOn WIth Interplanted maIze!canavaha under mInImUm tillage sy~tem In the subhumld lowland . . . avanna ([Mmers' management 1992) Interplanted tallow (legume!cerectls) and mInImUm ullage Me two Important strategIes for sustaInable croppmg systems The use of Interplanted fallow WIth appropnate legume species has the advantage of prodUCIng an abundant mulch which helps In the protecuon of soIl whIle redUCIng the mtenslty of weeds ThIS expenment has been conducted In 1992 The legume species Canavalza ensiformls was used as test crop at an Interval of 4 meters between plant on the row It was planted 3 weeks after maIze plantIng, one row of canavaha every two rows of maize Tnals were set up on one ~Igth (1/S) ha In SIX dIfferent farmers fields located at DJahngo, Ouro-Labo and BadJouma There was no land preparauon WIth mechanIcal Implements Only a total herbiCIde (paraquat 411ha) was appbed at plantIng ume In wmbInatIon WIth the pre-emergent herbiCIde (pnmextra 2 l!ha)The mam objectIves were to eVdludte at 6 locatIons under fMmers condItIons and management a systems of mterpianted fallow (maize/canavaha) planted WIth mirumum tIllage and to evaluate the performc:tnce and acceptance by farmers of the reSIdual effects of mterplanted legume speCIes on soIl ferulity dnd YIeld of subsequent maIZe crop Results are shown m Table 2 The (2 1) mterplantmg system used ~eems a satJ.~fac~ one as the competItIon between the legume canavaha and the maIze crop was not strong enough to reduce maIze YIeld sigruficantly 4 4 1 3 ~ On-fdrm te:>t/DemOn'itratlon WIth mterplanted fallow WIth maIze/legume speCIes under conventional tillage and hedgeIOw of pIgeon peas. (Farmers management) 1992ThIS expenment wa~ ('dlTied out m 1992 dt OUIO-Ldho dnd BeldJoUina m 6 fdrmer\\' fields A RCBD WIth 2 replIcatIons per SIte was set up usmg a system of Blocs dIsperses The same mterplanted pattern de'icnbed above was used The legume speCIes mvolved m the dIfferent treatments were canclvalIa, CrotaIMIa, pIgeon peels The check plot was mono-crop maIze A hedgerow of plgeon peas was planted every 7 metersThe mam objectIves were to compare under farmers' conditIons and management the Impact on maIze performance of these dIfferent mterplantIng systems (maIze/legume) WIth those of monm.rop maize under conventIoncll tIlldge elt several locatIons, to evaluate the reSIdual effects of the legume ~pe(,les on SOlI feruhty and subsequent YIeld of maize crop To mtroduce to selected farmers the system of mterplanted fallow as well as allow croppmg WIth hedgerows of pIgeon peas In 1993, the same expenment was carned out at Ouro-Iabo and DJahngo m 6 farmers fields but cowpea wa~ replaced by calopogonlum muwnOldes Re~ults aIe shown m table 3 Most of the farmers showed a pOSItIve reactIon towards mterplanted tallow and the hedgerow system WIth the pIgeon peas 4414Effects of mterplanted maize/legumes under conventIOnal tIlla&e on maIze performclnce at seyerell farmers' field m the !)ubhUImd lowland ~clYelnna (1992).Tills trIal mvolved 2 treatInents WIth mterplanted felllow (m 1992) mdize/cowpea plus canavaha and maIze/pIgeon peas plus canavaha usmg the 2 1 pattern The trIals were carned out m 10 farmers fields located m Sanguere and DJalmgo Results are shown m table 4 4 4 2 Research on multIpurpose legume species for sustainable crOpping systems In the subhuIDld lowland SdVannd.A set of 2 expenments on mUltIpurpose legume speCIes for sustamable croppmg 'iystems were planted at DJahngo 56Response of maIze and sorghum to mterplanted fourrage legume, Tlus expellment whICh ~tdrted m 1991 mvolved the use of 4 legume tordge specle'iThe legume speCIes were planted at the same time as maIze and sorghum usmg a pattern of 2 rows of cereals tOl 1 row of legumes The spac.mg between malze tow was 1 m A moderdte dmount ot fertIlIzer WdS used Interpldnted ceredl-Iegume~ WdS u~ed lfl dn effort to lflcrease the economIC value of the system and kame It more attractIve to farmersThe mam objectives were to study the performdnce of maize and sorghum grown m an mterplanted tallow sy\\tem WIth forage grown m an mterplanted fallow system WIth forage system legume speCle~ and to develop lIustamable and profitable production systems of cereals and iOlage (tOl hve~tock) whIle Improvmg sod propertIes (mtegratIon crop/hvestock) ObservatlOns made m the maize trIal seem to mdIcdte that a better time to plant some legume species (hke crotdlana, calopogomum) would be about 3 weeks after plantmg maize Tills relay system could reduce plant competItIon m case of severe dry spells or erratIc ThIS expenment was \\tdrted m 1991 The mam objectIve IS to evaluate the reSIdual effects of these legume speCIes used m mtercroppmg With maIze m 1991 on the maIze YIeld The legume spec]e\" u\\cd were the ~ame m 1991 which regrew m 1992 except pIgeon peas The monocrop mdlze-mal2;(;! Wd~ u~ed as d control Each treatment wa~ dIVided mto two sets of subplots One \\et of ~ubplot~ With maize, WIth two levels of fertIlIzatIon for each treatmentl, no fertlltzer and WIth tertIlIzer A system of mmlmum tIlldge was used thiS mal WIth the legume mulch after kIllmg regowth by herblclde~ (gramoxone) In the other ~ubplots, the legume specle~ were left WIth regrowth m an effort to momtor the amount of bJOmass produced by the regrowth and as well as the abilIty of these legume ~'Pecles to complete and suppress weed Results are shown m tdble 6 (a) When no fertIlizer was u~ed, the legume treatment produced an extrd gram Yield of maize of up to 1 08t/ha( +92 %) as compared to monocrop malZe For Stylosanthes, bIOmass was, 9 3 tlha and It gave good weed suppressIOn Canavaha had very httle regrowth and weed suppressIOn was poor In 1993, tlus expenment was contInued In the thrrd croppmg season (1993) there wele reSidual effects of only two legume speCies, mterplanted WIth maIze m 1991, on maIze performance The objectIves are the same as 1992 The subplots where the legume species were left WIth regrowth m 1992 received two levels of fertIlIzation, no fertIlIzer and With fertIltzer Results are m table 6b When no fertIhzer was used, the legume treatment gave an mcrease m gram YIeld of maize up to 2 21 tlha (138%) as compared to monocrop maize 57 Effect of dIfferent mterplanted ~ystem (maIze) legume specIes) on maIZe performance m lowland savanna (1992), ThIS study whIch started at DJahngo m 1992 has been conducted wIth the legume specIes canavaha, Crotalana, casSia obtubifoha, Stylo~anthes, PIgeon peas, Cowpea The legumes were planted 3 weeks after maIze plantmg used a pattern of 2 rows of cereals for 1 row of legumes The spacmg between maIze rows was 1 m Interplanted cereals/legumes was used ill an effort to mcrease the econOffilC value of the system and make It more attractIve to the farmers of the reglOn The ObjectIves were to evaluate the performance of maIZe grown m an mterplanted system WIth several specIes of legumes, to evaluate the resIdual effects of these legumes on sou fertility and subsequent maize yIeld Results are m table 7a 4424Second croppmg season 1993 Residual---effects of 8 gram legumes on maIze fertIlIzatIOn m the subhumld lowland ~avanna, ThIS startt.d at Djalmgo m 1992 whele gram legume speCIes were planted crotalana, canavalta, mucuna, pIgeon peas, cassIa obt Stylosanthes, Calopogoruum and cowpea In 1993, each treatment was dIvIded mto two sets of maIze subplots, WIth two levels of fertIlIzer, no fertIlizer and WIth fertIlIzer The mam objectIve was to evaluate the reSIdual effect on soli prOdUCtivIty of these legume specIes Results are shown m tdble 7 b The observatIOns on thIs trIal confirm that these legume speCIes are well adapted to the agrochmatIc condItions of the sudan gumea savanna as well as to mterplanted fallow system 4425Response of maIze and sorghum to mter:vlanted &ram le2ume speCIes m the subhumId lowland sayannJ!... Tills expenment WhICh has been conducted at Djalmgo mvolved the use of cowpea, pIgeon peas, a mIXture of pIgeon peas and cowpea crotalarta (Improved fallow) and monocrop The plantmg patterns used were 2 rows of maIze (or sorghum) WIth 1 row of legume speCIes The lllterrow spaclllg between maIZe was 1 m A moderate level fertilIZer was used MaIZe and sorghum were planted at the same tIme WIth the legume crop The mam objectIve of thIs study was to evaluate the performance of maIze grown III an lllterplanted system WIth gram legume crops Results are shown m table 3 It IS mterestmg to note that the competItIon due to the food gram legume YIeld was greater than that of the legume forage crops 443 Study on Crop RotatIon system In the subhumtd lowland 4431Effect of dIfferent crop rotatIOn system on the performance of maIze and sorgllum (1991) , Tills study has been started m 1989 at Djalmgo where 7 precedmg crops were used Cowpea groundnuts pIgeon peas, soybeans, crotalarta, cotton and cereal A rotation system cotton/Cereals (as practIced by many farmers) was used as check All the precedmg crops were planted usmg conventIOnal tillage and harvested m 1990 Followmg farmers' practIces, crop reSIdues were removed from the SOlI before plantmg the cereals m 1991 The mam objectives were to {.ompdfe the performam.e of maIze and sorghum after severallegummous and non legumInous crops WIth theIr pertormance after cotton to compMe a system of Improved fallow management WIth a crotalana WIth dItferent of crop rotatIOn USIng gram legumes These re~ults confu med once more the Value of Crotalana as a valuable component In an Improved fallow system management tor the regIOn In 1992, the same expenment was conducted by rotation cereals/legume 4432ReSIdual effects of dIfferent legume crops used In rotatIOn system Nitrogen fertIhzation of maIze In subhumld lowland savanna (1991).ThiS expenment which WaS ~tarted In 1989 was carned out In 1990 and 1991 on 1 ha at Djahngo Four legume crop~ were u~ed a~ precedIng c..rops glOundnut~, pigeon pea~, cowpeas crotalarld (dn Improved fallow) and a control treatment conMstmg of contmuous croppmg of cereal Four level~ ot N were applIed atter each mam treatment 0, 45, 90, 135 kgs N/ha (usmg Ured dS N source) The maIn objectIves were, to determme the response of maIze to N fertIlIzdtIOn a~ affected by these dIfferent legume precedIng crops, to compare the Improved fallow system WIth crotaldna In 1992 dnd 1993, thIS expenment WdS carned out In the same conditIOns as In 1992 Cumulative results for the 3 years are shown m table 9 444 Effects of different rdtes oftourteau de coton (cotton seed cdke) on maIze YIeldIn subhumld lowland ~dvannd of North Cameroon (1991) The u~e of lOCally avaIlable orgdllIc by-products could contrIbute sIgmficantly to the sustamablhty of the croppmg ~y~tem m the lowland savanna as mmerdl (Imported) fertIhzer has become very expensive The use of tourteau de coton (T C ) as a partIal substitute deserves careful ~tudy ThiS experIment whll-h was started m 1990, was carned out m 1991 The ultlmate obju\"tIve of thIS study IS to determl!le the most economIcal and prc:lctIcal wmbmatIOn of T C and fertIlIzer In order to achIeve good and 1Iustc:lmc:lble Yields of maIze Three rates of T C were u'ied 0, 300, 600 kgs/ha. The T C IS an orgamc by-product WIth 8% Nand 1 % K Two fertIlIzer (ates were u'ied the rate recommended by SODECOTON and used by many tdrmers and half of thl~ rate Both fertIlIzer and T C were apphed banded one week after maize emergence At thIS rate 1 kg ot T C was assOCiated WIth an mcrease of 2 83 kg of maIZe gram In 1992, the Sdme expenment was carned out In the same conditIons and With same objective At thiS I ate, 1 kg of 1 C was aSSOCiated With an Increase or 2 49 kgs of maize gram CumulatIvl fl\",\\ults are ~hown m tc:lble 10 445 Effect of cow manure on mdlze performance III subhuIDld lowland savanna (1992) ThiS expenment has been conducted III 1992 at djahngo PrevlOus expenments have shown that cow mc:lIlUre helps Illcrease YIeld of maIze m thiS region However, the amount of cow manure needed (5 tlha) to effect a sIgmficant Impact on YIeld IS an obstacle to Its use as collection of manure requITes a lot of work and an adequate transport system The mam objectIve was to evaluate the effects of two reduced levels of cow mdllure WithOUt and With fertIlIzer on gram YIeld of maIze Cow manure (1 and 2 tlha as well as fertIltzer) were appbed banded Results are ~hown lfi table 11 Usmg cow manure m band apphcatlOn at a reduced rate (1 or 2 tlha) seems an effectIve, practIcal practIce for the farmers of the regIOn ThIS study started m 1989 m a farmers' field at Karite In 1990, several crops were planted as precedmg crops groundnuts, cowpea, soybean, pIgeon peas, cotton, crotalarta and cereal (maize-sorghum) They were harvested m the same season In 1991, maIze and sorghum were planted (u~mg a spht plot desIgn) after these dIfferent precedmg crops A farmers rate of feruhzer was used Crops were planted at the end of June for the next expenment (1992) and harve~ted Stngd counD. were mdde dt 3 tImes, 9, 12, 14 WAP (weeks after plantIng) m the 4 central rowsThe mam objectIves of thiS expenment were, to eVdluc1te at short dnd medIUm term the dIfferentIal response ot mdlze dnd sorghum to several trap crops grown m rotatIon on an Alfisol severely lllfested WIth Stnga hermontlca and to evaluate the dynaffilcs of the Stnga populatIOn m the tredtmenb Results showed that the be~t precedmg crop for maIze wai) Crotalarla, followed by cowpea and cotton, and for sorghum was It crotalarIa, followed by cowpea and groundnutsIn 1992, thIS study was carned out WIth the same precedmg crops WhIch were planted m 1991 (soybean wa~ replaced by CasSia obtusljolla and cowpea for sorghum) The best was crotalana, follow cd by CasJLQ obtusljolla, Cowpea and groundnuts In 1993, thIS expenment In 1992, the ~ame study was tondutted but WIth Crotalana, Cas!'J1a obtusifolla, Cassia occldentalls used a~ a test legume specIe~ Regard10g 1Otercropp1Og patterns, the mo~t effective one seem~ to be the tIeatment whIch 1Ovolved plantIng one legume~ ~pecles (casSia obtusifolla, CasSia OccldentalLs, Crotalana) Effect of Interplanted MaIze/legume SpeCIes on GraIn YIeld (1993) In the low rdmfdll zone, varIeties ~uch as ICSV-l11, ICSV-I079 dnd CS-130 gdve good resul~ over 10cdtIOns (tables 1, 2 and 3) Furthermore, It appedred that Vdnetle~ which performed well undu lUUlted rdlll fdll and other \\tre~ll fdctorl) m zone I are edrly mJtuIlng cultIvclrs Thelle cultIvar~ e~cdpe the drought thdt ocwrl) dunng to the fdllly-\\eel\\on by completing their cyde belOie thc rellll lltoP\\ A ~econd gIOUp of valletle\\, ndmely CS-233, CS-244 dnd ICSV-1063 \\howed ~dtl~tdltory 1 e~ul~ tor the zone ot higher rdmfdll over two yedr~ m multIlocdtlOn tndh (telblell 4 and 5) Thelle varieties d~ well all the first three mentioned for zone I llhould be te\\ted III farmers' field conditions Among the ramy llea~on locdl \\orghum\\ that were collecteo ~mce 1988, punfied and mdde untform, ~ome cultIvars lIke Boulbasslfl, Gueden-Guelmg, Wongtosho and ZouJye gdve encouragmg re~ul~ m varIOUS locations m Far North Provmce These local Vdnetlel) helve been found dgronomIcdlly performdnt, WIth good yield potentIdl Therefore, they Will be used to mcrease the number of the parental matenals which con~tltute the bd\\e of our long term breedmg progr dm VegetatIve cover IS necessary to protect the soIl surface from ram drop Impact and consequent surface compactIon and runoff Legummous cover crops would have the additIonal benefit of contributIng some N to the soIl for subsequent crops The fIrst questIon to be answered was whether there are some adapted species whIch grow rapidly durmg the ramy season Thus screenmg of candIdate legumes began m 1991 at Mouda on a gravelly ferrugmous Alfisol and continued m 1992 at three addltIonal sItes (Ndonkole on VertIsols, Gumng on alluVIal m plams sOlI and Guetale on alluvIal soIl near mountams) to evaluate the adaptabIlIty on dIfferent soIl types Species whIch dld not estabhsh or grow well such as Stylosantes hamata and S guyanenSlS, Centrosema pascuorum and C brasllzanum 1991 and 1992 were dIscarded m 1993 In 1993 ten proffilsmg specIes out of twenty were te~ted for the the thIrd time at the same sItes except Gumng Legumes species screened were mostly from ILCA IKaduna, IRZV Garoua and local collection They were planted m pure stand 10 smclll plots 10 RCBD every year Groundcover, blOma~s and soIl temperature were measured Nodule formatIon was also observed From 1991 to 1993, Mucuna prunens proVIded the earhest and most complete cover (60 days after plantIng) Mucuna and Canavalla species accumulated the hIghest bIOmass Late pIgeon pea and Canavalla stayed green the longest SoIl temperature was often negatively correlclted WIth cover crops 1 e lower when bIOmass was hIgher Nodules were found m all speCIes tested except Canavalza and Cajanus cajan Most of the nodules were pmk: tnSlde (except cowpea) 10dIcatmg that they were actively fixmg mtrogen Seed production was mfluenced by the genotype and enVIronment ObservatIon of PIgeon Pea and CaSSIa Slamea Hedgerows and ASSocIated Crops WhIle alley Cropp1Og IS consIdered to be a blOloglcally susta10able croppmg system 10 the hunud and subhunud zones, It may not be appropnate m seffil-and areas The tree species whIch are most adapted to dry condItions may be those whIch most compete With an assocIated crop for soIl mOIsture Thus, from 1991 to 1993, trIals were conducted to observe the growth and response to prumng of pigeon pea Cajanus cajan and Cassza szamea and the YIeld of assocIated crops The trees were e~tabh~hed m 1990 PIgeon pea was planted at the onset of the rams every year In 1991, assocIated peanut YIelds were lower 10 the two rows next to the Cassza Slamea hedgerow than m the central rows whIch were one meter or more from the hedgerow (table 1) PIgeon pea depleted soIl mOIsture and reduced Yield of assocIated peanut In 1992, gram YIeld 10 the central rows of the Cs plots was equal to that of the umplowed control Y lelds m plowed plots were 25 % higher, possibly reflectmg Improved mOIsture or fertIhty status due to mcorporated reMdues (table 2) Cassza szamea hedgerows also produced substantial amounts of firewood and did not compete Wlth an associated sorghum crop (FIG 1) Cotton was planted In 1993 In CasSla Slamea and CaJanus caJan hedgerows Although there was no competItIon for mOlsture, CasSla Slamea slgmficantly reduced cotton Yield because of shadIng CaJanus caJan was also depressive on cotton Yield but to a lesser extent (table 3) In 1991 two trIals were conducted to evaluate the effect of Stnga control With herbIcIdes for two croppmg seasons (1989 and 1990) 4) Emerged Stnga densltles m subsequent years were generally not sIgmficantly related to prevIous herbICIde treatments In 1991 and 1992 an Important researchable Issue was also the appropnate distance between sorghum and cowpea plants seed at plantmg Sorghum/Cowpea mtercrop dId not slgmficdlltly reduce Stnga emergence However, the number of Stnga carrymg mature capsules at sorghum harvest was sIgmficantly lowest m cowpea/sorghum mtercrop The lowest denSIty of mature capsule-bearmg Stnga plants was obtaIned WIth one hole of cowpea contammg two plants between two parr of sorghum holes whIle the hIghe~t was m the pure sorghum treatment However the hIghest Yield of the mtercrop was when two holes of cowpea (each contammg one plant) were placed at 5 cm from each parr sorghum holes (table 5)In 1992 and 1993 the lllitlal Stnga seedbank was determmed before surpenmposmg our \"best bet technologIes\" to reduce Stnga seed m the soIl PrevIOUS treatment was agam a non sIgmficant factor m Stnga seed denSIty (table 6 ) The major IllrutIng factor m Muskwan sorghum IS the amount of mOisture whIch IS present In the sOlI at the ttme of transplantIng (begmmng of the dry season) A study was conducted to quanttfy mOIsture depletton by the crop at two sites through mtenslve sod samplIng Totcll mOIsture loss from 0 to 80 cm depth was 105 cm at Mouda and 130 cm at Salclk Sod surface treatments (nattve grass mulch or superficial plowmg) dId not decrease so11 mOisture loss In The TLU was deSIgned to serve as a lInkage between research and extensIOn/farmers The ongmal objectIves of the TLU, lIsted m the Project contract dIe to tram extenSIOn personnel and agncultural technICIans, to deSIgn the methodology of on-farm tnals/demonstratIons, to coordmate the on-farm testmg program, to study the results mcludmg the socio-economic Impact of proposed recommenddtIons, to feed back on-farm research results and mformatIon on researchers, to translate research results mto recommendatIons to be extended to farmers, to develop, release and ease the adoptIon by farmers of appropnate agronomIC packages 6 1 3 CONSTRAINTS The constraInts most lImItIng on the work of the TLU BambUI dunng the last 3 years mcluded lack of adequate field lab faCIlItIes, non departure of natIond! counterparts for Ph D tralDlng, contInued IRA workers' strIke over unpaId salarIes, a volatIle polItIcal SItuatIon that prevented TLU staff from gomg out to theIr on-farm research SItes, the lay-off of many MIDENO YEW's that constItuted the mam techmcallabour force of the agncultural ExtenSIOn servIce In the NW Provmce dIfficultIes at the end of 1993 In gettIng fmanclal support because of the announcement of the antIcIpated phaSIng of the project out by Apnl 1994A second generatIon of vane tIes (e g maIze vanetIes ATP, SynthetIc 3 and 4, Early WhIte and HAP, and the TOX nce varIetIes), that entered on-farm testmg m 1989, Incorporated additIonal charactenstics desIred by farmers, a result of TLU feedback to the breeder~ These mcluded harder (t1mty) gram for longer storage lIfe, edflmess, shorter plants, tolerance to low pH SOlIs, and adaptatIon to the hIgh altItude zone for maIze, and, enhanced gram qualIty (long, narrow, translucent, slender grams) for nee, to make It more competItIve m the market WIth Imported nce from ASIa These vanetIes of maIZe dIld nce are bemg extended to farmersThe on-farm trIals program was complemented (and motIvated m later years) by farmers surveys srngle VISIt descnptIve, resource momtonng (descnptIve), and rapId rural appraIsals, (RRAs) , retentIOn and dIffusIOn studIes RRAs (diagnostIcs) helped IdentIfy research tOpICS Important to solvmg farmers' problems (e g , assessmg storage losses, erosIOn and so11 ferultty problems)The TLU also ImtIated a program of Jomt researcher-farmer managed on-farm sod conservatIon (mamly use of contour bunds for erosIOn control) and soIl fertIlIty Improvement 2) condlnons generally encountered on farmers' fields vanety ATP IS the least affected (most stable) by changes m soli aCidity This I~ e~pecldlly so m SOlI groups 2-3 Synthetic 4 showed about the same tolerance to low soIl pH as A TP The farmer however, gave greater YIeld response to soIl aCIdIty amendments and A TP appears more tolerant to high Al SaturanonThe followmg recommendanons summanze the 4 years on-farm maIze vanety tnals In the mld-alntude zone (1000-1500 mas 1) synth 4 IS recommended for aCId sol1s With strong volcamc ash mfluence (sod group 1) and aCId solls denved from granItes (group 3) On solls formed on older basalts where volcanIC ash mfluence IS now to mimmal, A TP IS recommended for both resource poor and medIUm farmers Farmers who can afford up to 300kg/ha 20-10-10 compound femhzer should connnue WIth kasal m thts zone ATP IS equally recommended for resource poor farmers whose preference IS for the yellow matze III soIl groups 1 & 3 For the hIgh alntude zone, HAP appears to be a VIable alternanve for farmers who can afford a hIgher dose of femhzer for therr maIze crop Flllally, seed mulnpltcanon for ATP, Synth 4, Kasal and HAP on a large scale IS recommended MaIze Mlmktt Tnals Smce 1991, the objective of the mllloot program has been redefined so that farmers and extensIon workers' assessments become a major concern EvaluatIon questlOnnarres compnse 3 sheets Instead of one Forms 2 and 3 deal WIth post harvest operations and extenSIOn feed back respecnvelyThe approach has been Improved and benefited from the NAET program Implemented III West Provlllce WIth well traIned and qualIfied extenSIon agents, on the contrary of the NW ProvInce where agrIcultural extensIOn servIces are gettIng loose because of MIDENO workers' salary strIke and the layoff of most of them Much more reltable mformatlon was obtamed and WIll help the TLU Zone areas In recommendation domams WIth respect to major constramts, opporturnnes and farmers' asprratIons Up to date, 3264 mmlklts have been dIstrIbuted to extensIOn staff In the Western HIghlands Hybnd MaIze PopulatIOn x FertIlIzer, The Western HIghlands MaIze BreedIng Urnt has to date developed two hybnd maIze vanetIes adapted to the mId-altitude zone of the area The objective of thIS trIal was to develop an on-the-shelf technology for hybnd maIze productIOn m the mId-altItude zone of the Western HIghlands Results showed that plant denSIty (40,000, 52,000 and 60,000 plants/ha) and N rate (40,80 and 120 kg N/ha) slgmficantiy affected gram YIelds at IRA sub-statIon Babungo WhIle the only Mgmficant treatment effect was plant denSIty In Mban Brrrn (Ngaoundere IRA sub-station) Lack of response to P (50, 100 and 150 kg P 2 0./ha) was due largely to prevIOus P apphcatIons at both SIdes There were no Interactions between denSIty and fertIltzer rates at both SItes even though average ear weIght per plant decreased sIgrnficantiy WIth Increasmg plant denSIty and tended to fIse WIth IncreaSIng N ratesThe conclusIOn from both sItes IS that optimum pldnt den~lty for the hybnd mdIze In the mId-altitude IS about 50,000 plants/ha A mtrogen fertIlIzer rate of 80 kg/ha and the P recommendation for open pollInated varIety In an envIronment should be ~ufficient for hybnd maIze In the zone MaIze/Legume Intercroppmg AdaptabIlIty of new NCRE mId-altitude maIze vaneties (Synth 3, Early WhIte (EW) and ATP) to Intercroppmg WIth food legumes-(bean phaseolus i1/2 dnd \\oYdhedn Glvxwe l!1£ll) were te'ited for 2 year'i at full recommended densIties (40,000 plants/ha for mdIZe, 267,000/ha for soyabean and beans) and feruhzer rate (80-20-20/ha) at Mfonta and BabungoThe results (Table 3) showed that bean or soyabean Intercrop consIstently reduced gram YIelds compared to thdt of sole maIze crop The seventy of YIeld reductIOn was In the order of magmtude Synth 3 > EW > A TP > Local The dIfferences among the vanetles were slgmficant (P < 05)The 3 Improved maIze vanetles were higher YIeldmg than the locdl ones at both locatIOns Although maize followed the same trend under bean or soyabean mtercroppmg, the mteractIOn between maIze and legume was not .sIgmficant Be,ms mtercroppmg affected maIze YIeld more than soyabean The mference of the lack of sIgmficant mteraction between the maIze varIeties and the legumes IS thdt there IS no need to select separate maIze vaneties for adaptabIlIty to bean or soyabean mtercroppmg WIthout modIfymg therr vegetatIve archItecture Frog-eye leaf spot (Cercospora SOlina) wall the most Important dIsease encountered at the expenmental SIte There was no relatIonshIp between matunng date and seed vlablltty (% germmatIon), but the early maturIty lmes appear to be hIgher nodulatIng than the late and medIUm matunng hnes Based on gram YIeld, seventy of leaf spot dIsease mCIdence and seed vIabIlIty, the 3 top rankIng lmes were TGX 1448-ZE(M) > TGX 1440-IE(M) > TGX 1447-3D(M) The seeds of these 3 hnes were multIpbed for further tests of adaptatIon to Western HIghland envrronments SoIl Amendment and FertIlizer Effect on MaIze. The tnal was ImtIated In 1989 to compare the effect of three levels of fertIhzer (0-0-0, 50-60-50, 100-120-100 kglha of N, P 2 0 S and K 2 0 respectIvely), manure (compost), orgarnc matter (plant reSIdues) and 5 tons of dolomite on maize Yield The amendment treatments were applIed once m 1989 and fertIhzer treatmen~ to maIze every year The reSIdUal effect of amendments were assessed for 5 yearsThe 1992 results showed that only fertIlIzer applIcatIon sIgmficantly (P < 0 5) mcreased maIze gram YIeld at all levels As m years 1990-91, the hmmg treatment mcreased maIze YIeld (not slgruficantly) when compare to other amendment sources, mcludmg the check (4 93 tons/ha vs 4 15, 4 25 and 4 73 tons/ha) There was no fertIlIZer x amendment mteractIon mmcatmg that the response was not mfluenced by the type of amendment and that YIeld Increase was only due to the feruhzer effect The hme and hIghest femlIzer level slgmficantly Increased the plant heIght RapId Rural AppraIsal Survey of Ngle Durmg the week of July 12-18, 1992, two TLU researchers JOIned a multIdIsplmary team of 11 agncultural researchers from dIfferent InstItutlons and an Agroforestry Peace Corps Volunteer to carry out a RRAS (RapId Rural AppraIsal Survey) of Ngle (a SIngle clan enclave m Momo DIVISIOn m the NW Provmce) The survey IndIcated that the most Important factors llInItIng farmers' efforts In the area of crop productIon, soIl conservatIon and agroforestry were the follOWIng In the order of Importance 1) S01l degradatIOn (severe erosIOn and fertIlIty declIne), 2)Tree/crop damages by cattle and small hvestock, 3)Unclear demarcatIOn between grazmg and crop lands, 4)Deforestatlon and overcroppmg of land, 5) tree plantmg wIll be hampered by a land tenure system, 6)Uncontrolled bush fIres that destroy trees and the microflora, 7)Lack of extensIOn staff tramed In proven soIl conservatlon methods The studIes on the resIdual effects of ankara showed that the followmg year 1993, the control plot + fertIlIzer (200kg/ha 20-10-10 compound fertIlIzer) outylelded the ankara plots (Table 5), showmg the short hfe of the practice (1983)(1984)(1985)(1986) In 1991, 86 farmers m the mld-alhtude zone who had maIze varIety trIals on theIr fdrms m 1989 or 1990 were regularly vISIted and mtervlewed Results of these mterviews revealed that mean retenhon rates for the Improved maIze varIetIes (1 e % of farmers shll groWIng at ledst 1 Improved varIety on a part of therr farm In subsequent years) was 91 % By varIety, Kasal I, Coca and ATP had the hIghest retenhon rate WIth 83%,44% and 28% re<;pechvely SIXty mne percent (69%) of the respondents retamed only 1 unproved varIety. whIle 23 % retamed 2 varlehes Although 4 to 8 varlehes had been tested on each farm, farmers were encouraged to keep seed and plant more than I or 2 new vanetles the next year Preservatlon of seed was apparently the key problem Farmers retammg at least I1mproved varIety planted It on an average 51 % of therr maIze land, which means that the Improved varlehes were estabhshed on 46 % of the total land area planted to maIze EIghty-three percent (83 %) of the tnal farmers who had tested KASAl planted It on 43 % of therr malzecropped land, or 36% of total maIze land For COCA the figures were 44%,36% and 16%, and for ATP, 28%, 37% and 10% respechvely In 1992, the TLU team repeated the retenhon survey on the farmers pamclpated m the \"mmlklt\" Tnals of the preVIOUS years (1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990) Queshonnarres were sent out to the West and North West ProvInces to be conducted by the AVV and YEW's from the DDA or Agncultural posts The conhnuous croppIng of the Improved maIze vanehes was achIeved despIte varIOUS problems The pamcIPdhng farmers (50%) SaId the maIze usually weeviled m therr stores Some reported brrd destruchon (16 %) and anImal damages (11 %) WIth cattle and goats contrIbuhng for 4 % For the chdractenshcs they sought for pioduCIng maIze, YIeld came first, taste second, earlIness thIrd WIth the mean rank bemg 2,3, and 4 respechvely Here COCA and KASAl one more hme gave therr proofs WIth 41 % retenhon rate of each In 1993, the retenhon survey was repeated on the pamclpatmg farmers WIth the mImktt tnals from 1990 to 1992 The ObjectIves were to assess the Impact of on-farm maIze varIety test on farmers' field and the tested vanehes of retenhon rate The h~t of 379 farmers, taken from 1990-92 mmoot trials was our reference 114 farmers were randomly select~ The sample SIze for each vanety was proport1onal to the number of parucipants receIvmg that varIety The results of 1993 survey are presented m Tables 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 It appears that 53 % of farmers shll grow the Improved maIze on an average of 24 % of therr maIze land The IRA vanehes were estabhshed on 13 % of the total land area planted to maIze By varIety, Synth 3 and MSR were hIghly retamed, 75 % and 71 % respechvely When assessmg speCIfic charactenshcs of new varlehes, m companson WIth the local (farmer's vanety), the respondents found that, on average, the new vmehes do not store as well but Liste hetter and have hetter cookmg quahty and color (Table 9) For the contnhuhon of Improved varlehes to the uhhzahon of the maIze harvested, some of the paruclpanng farmers saId that the new variehes mcreased therr rate of consummg maIze, quanhty of maize sold, produchon of corn beer and the quanhty ot feed for chIckens, and brought them to thmk about the produchon of feed for chIckens At the highest fertIlIzer level F 3 , the IRA maize hybnds slgruficantly (p < 0 05) out-yIelded those of Pioneer Seed company both at SIte I and III respectIvely that couldn't even do better than 0 P vanetIes at the F2 level (except at the SIte II) Also at the F3 level, all IRA hybnds Yielded hIgher than the 0 P 's At thIs modest lllvestment an average of 28 5 % YIeld mcrease was realIzed An additIondl 40kg N/ha to F 2 caused a general decrea~e In IRA Hybnd Yields at all Sites, mrucatmg that the optImum level ~hould be between F2 and F3 MedIUm and large scale maIze producers capable of mvestIng a lIttle more on fertIlIzer dlld seeds can make good profit on hybrId maIze productIon FIeld caltbratIon for maIze P requrrement ThiS tnal was establtshed m 1991 at IRA Mfonta and Babungo to determme the pattern of maIze response to P levels for maIze In 2 different soIl groups In 1992, the plots (mam plots) were splIt III three 6m x 5m small plots (spItt plot) and addItIonal treatments of 0, 100, and 200kg P20S were ~uper Imposed on the ongmal plots turnmg the deSIgn to a splIt plot m a RCBD WIth 4 replIcatIons So11 and plant analyses along WIth gram YIeld WIll be used to calIbrate optImum levels of avatlable P for maIze m both soIls Prehmmary data on the relatIonship between soIl tests for avaIlable P and maIze gr dIn Yield showed that Bray 1 and 2 tests were strongly correlated WIth graIn YIeld at Babungo The contrary was the case of Mfonta There appears ~o be a need for a new soIl te~t method for assessmg avaIlJble P In those SOlIs formed on low lava typIfied by Mfonta The results of 1993 soIl analYMs WIll be used for cdltbrJtIon MaIze YIeld respon\\t,s to tresh P applIcatIOn m 1991 and to the resIdual effects of apphed P In 1992 .1I c \\hown 111 Table 12 In the year of applicatIOn, 50kg PzOslhd dPpeared adequate at Babungo On the conti ary small mcreases m YIeld were obtamed wIth mcreasmg P rates at Mfontd 1 he re.)pon\\e pdttern Wd~ however, clearer for the resIdual effects Except for the CO'1twj dna the 2nd year's 50kg/ha tredtment~ whele there was reduction In YIeld, maIze Yield\", 10 the 2nd dnd 1rd years dfter P applitatlOn wete generally hIgher than m the 1 st year MdlA YIeld mcrea\\ed WIth IOcreasmg rate\\ of pi eVlOU'i P applicatIOn The'ie ml.rease~ were MgllliIcdIlt up tv lOOk.g PzO/ha at Bdbungo dnd 200kg PzOslha at Mtontd Pnor to 1991, the TLU concentrated on strdlght-forward Yield enhancmg technologies (unproved vanetles and agronomIC practlces requmng slgmfkdnt mve!ltment m external mputs, mamly fertIlIzer) to maXImIze the probablhty of rapid and med~urable project Impdct Future research needs to address longer term agncultural development goals m the reglOn In the future, the emphdsl~ of the TLU work Will be on developmg low mput, farm reo;;ource cono;;ervmg, Yield suo;;tammg technologIe) Agronomic theme\\) Will as\\)ume greater Importance, mcludmg ~tudIes on 1) reled~e of plant nutI lents tled up m ~Oll organIc matter whIch IS sometlme~ as hIgh dS 15% (d pdftIculdf problem m cool hIgh altitude zone), 2) field cahbratIon for P for groups 3-5 as IS currently bemg done for SOlI group 1 and 2 at Mfonta and Babungo, takmg mto consideratlon the varIable P ~()rptlon cdpacitIes, and 3) farmer evaluatIon of legummous planted fallow crops-crotalafla, mucund and cdrndvaha On-fMm varIetal testIng (expanded to mclude foodcrop~ other thdn mdlze and nce, e g , potatoe&, soyabean) WIll wntmue, With greater attentlOn to crop chdrdctefl\\tIc~ de)lred by farmersThe greatest strength of the TLU ha~ been It\\ clo\\e dnd effective wlldbor atlon With the extensIOn service and other development proJect~ dnd m:::.tltutlon\\ 1 hl\\ will undoubtedly be the bIggest key to contmued success m the future Co~t effiCIent on-farm research methodologIes wIll be the norm (e g , the mmlklt trial) and the~e WIll depend on good hnkages WIth extenslOn ---------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ RelatIvely low ratIngs for roastIng were gIven for the hJghland varIetIes and CMS 8501 and 8503, whIle 8704 and 8806 were preferred Generally, ratIngs were same for bOllmg, and CMS 8501 was rated very hIghly m thIS case For fufu, CMS 8501 receIved hIgher ratIngs than all the others Pap, Kola and comchatf were also prepared by some people, and the IRA vanetIes were consIdered good m these forms WeevIls were to be less m IRA vanetIes though responses were few About 50% saId they wIll pay more for IRA maIze m the market The return rate thIs season was very low, however, CMS 8501 contInues to have hIgher perceIved YIelds across all zones It should contInue m mmlklts to ascertam quahty charactenstIcs but because of hIgh ratIng of CMS 8704 and Its desrrabIhty for green maIze, It should contInue as mmlklts 1992 624 6 Potential to adopt Acroforestry Tecbnolocy Generally, farmers m Southwest and LIttoral provmces retam only few trees m therr food crop farm~ Trees ob~erved were very sparse and mc1uded only economIC speCIes such as bush mango (lrvmgta gabonensls), natIve pear (Decryodls edults) and bItter cola (Cola agummata) Other trees protected were lroko, mahogany and burna for structural purposes Land tenure system by mhentance compared WIth purchase IS hIgh (87 %), therefore adoptIon of agroforestry systems may be easy under these condItIons 6 2 4 7 Cocoyam ProductIOn III Fako, SWP.Labor IS the most lImItIng factor m crop productIon m S W P A specIfic survey to ascertam labor use m cocoyam productIon showed that most of the producers were women (79 % )Major productIon constramts are labor, agncultural credIts, root rot dIsease, marketIng and transportatIon FamIly labor accounts for 92 % of total labor Cocoyam productIon IS a profitable venture WIth a net gam of 112,000 FCFA/ha Cocoyam output IS mfluenced by land, plantIng matenals and household labor (Table 3) The four year performance of the treatments IS presented m Table 4 HIgh maIze YIelds were obtamed wIth mcreasmg N dunng the fIrst year Thereafter, YIelds declmed rapIdly and were sImIlar to those WIth the hedgerow dunng the 2nd year By the thIrd and 4th years, the YIelds of the N treated plots, particularly at 40 kg N, were lower than those from the hedgerows Note StabIhty of gram YIelds from the hedgerows With Leucaena where It yIelded higher than With Ghncidia At zero N, maIze YIeld dechned lmearly With orne Table 4 Four year lalKe Yield (1989)(1990)(1991)(1992) at Yoke site as affected by HI trogen and hedgerows -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------2910 -----------------A screernng exercise mvolvmg perenmal covercrops, annual covercrops and complex crop mixtures for theIr effecoveness as ground covers to (a) control weeds (b) check erosIOn and (c) leave a reserve of nutrIents for subsequent crops was estabhshed PrelInunary results show that (1) Mucuna, cowpea and melon assocIated systems provIded rapId ground cover of 50 to 60% of the field surface at 36 days after planong Mimosa and Puerana covered only 10-15 % of the surface willie Croto/ana covered 40% Thus Mucuna, egusl melon and cowpea are good shades for weeds at early stages of plant growth (Table 5) Tills advantage of early shadmg conhnues 011 about 76 days or more Mucuna and other covercrops establIshed sole (Without cassava and maize) covered the ground at the same rate as cassava + maJ,Ze and could shade weeds only at early stages of growth (See Table 5, and B and D) ----------------------------------------------------------------DAYS AFTER PLANTING ------------------------------Weed % 18 36 54 76 300 at ------------------------------300PERCENT GROUND COVER ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- D Ca+Mz(fb Ca+Hz)I 10 30 55 75 42 53A companson of the effect of one year fallow management (system D) on maIze gram YIelds WIth that from the contmuous croppmg (system D) suggested that fallow management system WIth mimosa for nutrIent Improvement gave the hIghest resIdual effect on maIZe YIelds of 3 22 tlha followed by crotolana and puerana willIe mucuna gave the lowest Yield among the legumes BeSIdes gIvmg lowest resIdual YIeld, mucuna IS apparently not a good fallow legume because of Its voluntensm and It'S tendency to twme and wrap preceedmg maIze plants thereby strangulatmg them However, smce tlus IS from only one years data, It IS necessary to reduce the number of treatments to mclude only the three promlSlng legumes to further mvestIgate the usefulness of these cover crops m cassava + maIZe systems Based on tImmg of ground cover, an observation suggested to ensure both rapId and contrnuous ground cover IS to Identify and grow m mIxture, rapId growmg and late spreadmg cover crops eg Mucuna and Mimosa If they are complImentary 6 2 4 10 Control of Imperata cyhndnca ShadIng IS one means of controlhng spear grass, Imperata cylmdnca willch IS one of the most noXIOUS weeds Appropnate shade vanes WIth location and practices ConsIstent reduction of spear grass InCIdence has been observed In alley hedgerow plots unpruned for a year (Table 6) SImIlar relative reductions of spear grass mCIdence were observed ill plots WhICh were establIshed after one year of perenrual cover crops such as Mlmosa, Crotolana and Puerana The spear grass could be eradIcated If shadmg IS extended to 2-3 years and thts may be po~sIble WIth hedge row specIes and by adoptmg the method Illustrated WIth compatIble cover crop mIXIng Cocoyam grown In alleys partIcularly the fast growmg ~pecles WhICh rapIdly produce shade reduce the PythlUm rot seventy symptoms and led to hIgher corm YIeld, about 48 % (Table 7) Healthy cocoyams under shade are commonly observed m farmers cocoa or mtercrop fields hence thts observatIon IS practIcal A hIghly posItIve correlatIon was also observed between cocoyam cormel and corm YIelds (Y = -00 137 + 2 53X where X IS corm YIeld) ThIS equatIon may be Important m on-farm research where the cormel may be mllked by farmers or stolen pnor to data collectIon With the corms Intact, the expected cormel YIeld can be obtamed (Table 7) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------±SE 2 94 1 64 3 087 3 78 541 6 87 37 59One year old tIssue culture matenals ongmally denved from 8017 were established In the Yoke SIte dunng the first season of 1992 as observatIonal plots (18m 2 ) A local ca~~ava and a genetIcally Improved non tIs~ue culture 8017 were also e~tabhshed m eqUivalent plots Because of lImItatIon of plantIng matendls and vanatIons of stake SIzes, partIcularly of the tIssue culture ~tdkes, only four plots, 2 of tIssue culture -one of WhICh comprIsed plantIng mdtenals of small SIzes dUd one each of Improved TMS 30572 and local, were e~tdbhshed Table 8 shows that the tIssue culture matenals YIelded 17-28% higher than genetIcally Improved cassava dunng Its second year m field trialS The local cassava was extremely poor, Yleldmg only 2 2 ton~/ha root It IS desrrable to determme the progreSSIve YIeld levels of tIssue culture-denved plants compared WIth Improved plantmg matenals as a basIS for deternurung the economICS of producmg the tIssue culture plants for vanous econOmIC crops but unfortunately, the plot could not be re-establIshed m 1993 because the matenals were stolen from Yoke SIte EIght farmers In Bohfdmba area evaluated two ehte urumproved ROTREP cocoyam selectIOns m therr fields as supenmposed plots The objectIve was to venfy claIms of therr superIonty over locals m researcher managed on-statIon trIals ConSIdering cocoyam cormel, the pnced component, Table 9 shows that selectIon 1011 out yIelded the local by 11 % and selectIon 1006 YIelded lower than the local by 47% The total YIeld (corm + cormel) of the local IS hIgher than the selectIons ThIs result confrrms that supenor cocoyam selectIons may not be avaIlable m local stock Formed on mIxture of sedImentary and volcanIc matenals 6 2 4 15 AdoptIon, retentIOn and dIffuSIOn of IRA cassava Tills study was carned out In May, 1992 m 47 vIllages across all the dIVIsIOns and key zones of the proVInce Examples of some of the VIllages were Ntenmbang, NfaItock, Takwal, Aja, NjIma, Boa Bakundu, Mondont NatIve, NgUSI, DIpenda and Owe One hundred and fifty three (153) users out of a total of 595 enlIsted were IntervIewed Farmers mostly preferred red cassava, probably because of Its COOkabIhty charactenstIc over the IRA willte varIetIes (8017, 8034 and 8061) However, IRA vanetIes were not developed to cook SInce most of the cassava eaten m many households IS usually transformed Into water-fufu, gan, kumkum, etc Most partICIpants used IRA cassava for water-fufu and gan and also reported early matunty and illgh YIeldmg qualItIes of these vanetIes AdoptIon, retentIon and dIffuSIOn rates were 90%, 91 % and 77%, respectIvely (Table 11) Farmer to farmer was agam the pnmary dIffuSIOn route willIe aruma! damage and tuber rot were the major setbacks to retentIon Agroforestry opportunItIes hke the need for stakes, ftrewood, etc and land ownershIp (mostly mhented) are prevalent m the South West Provmce Bush burnIng and shlfimg culttvatlOn remam the major constramts to the eventual adoptIon of the agroforestry technology However, the farmers' land cleanng practtce of mulchmg IS a unIque mdlcator for the system South West farmers grow and/or mamtam trees on theIr ftelds mostly for cash and food 62417 Focus ydlage meetmgs.Dunng 1992 and 1993, the new approach was for the researchers to hsten to farmerfarmer mteractlOns on food crop constramts followed by farmer-researcher dIScussIons From farmer-farmer mteractton, several general constramts are noted OUTIng farmer-researcher mteractton, the problems are pnonttzed m each focus VIllage RelatIve Importance of the constramts across SWP IS determmed by ItS posltton m a rank system Subsequent research plans (and extenslOn technologIes) are determmed by the results of the exercIse ThIS approach IS only bemg developed and should be conttnued because group mteracttons were faclhtated and farmers felt relaxed when expressmg therr vIews to one another 6 2 4 18 Use of annual covercrops for fallow Improvement In 1992, the percentage ground cover as an mdex of weed control usmg Mucuna, MImosa, Crotolana and Puerana was reported The focus for 1993 was to evaluate the residual effect of these cover crops as a means of fallow Improvement MaIze ytelds were used as an mdex of ferttlIty o 97From the above table, the fallow management system usmg Mimosa gave the hIghest reSIdual effect on maIze YIelds of 3 22 tlha followed by crotolana and puerana whIle mucuna gave the lowest YIeld among the legumes BesIdes bemg lowest 10 YIeld from field observatlons, mucuna IS apparently not a good fallow legume because of Its voluntensm and thus tends to wrap on preceedmg maIze plants thereby stranglIng them However, smce thIS IS from only one years data, It maybe neles~ary to reduce the number of treatments to mclude only the three promlSlng legumes to further mvestlgate the usefulness of these covercrops 10 cassava + maIze systems 6 2 4 19 Peace corps agroforestry lInkage Agroforestry extenSIOn IS the malO actlvity of Peace corps volunteers assIgned to TLU ThiS year, we had 3 volunteers located 10 Malende (Fako DIvlSlon), Kembong and Fotabe (Manyu DIVISIon) PrIOr to the arnval of these volunteers, a number of problems were Identlfied WIth farmers adoptmg the alley system These were (a) InSuffiCIent farmer knowledge of what alley hedgerow meant, (b) unwIllIngness of farmers to comrmt land and tlme to plants whIch dId not YIeld VISIble mcome, (c) farmer unwIllIngness to change from therr normal bush fallow and rotatIon systems to permanent alley system, and the Impact of alleys were not readIly VISIble There has been an mcreased awareness of thIS technology 10 all peace corps VIllages TLU has provIded backstoppmg where necessary A survey to dIagnose farmers' deCISIOns and constramts WIth respect to adoptlng the agroforestry technology 10 peace corps vIllages had as one of Its obJectlves the educatIOn of farmers on the rmssion of the peace corps volunteers ThIS encouraged many more farmers to partICIpate or get mvolved eIther smgly or as groups Nursenes and demonstratIOn plots have been establIshed The peace corps have been able to Identlfy at least one of the tree legumes adaptable to therr VIllages or zones For example 10 Kembong -Calltandra and Cassta, Fotabe -Glmczdta. Malende (Fako) -Leucaena, and Mundemba -Leuc.aena The trIal crops were planted on the 21st of Aplll, 1992 but the estabhshment of Leucaena and Cassla alleys started on the 12th of September, 1991 The 1st cycle ended m December, 1993 The most tmportant pdrameter for the as'\\essment of the performance of plantam under the alley system was bunch weight I There are margInal dIfferences In bunch weIghts of plantams In treatments under al1eys, compared to tho'\\e wIthout alleys In the first cycle (Table 13) Leucaena alleys performed better than CaSHa as seen m the mean bunch weight 16 kg and 11 kg for plantaInS under Leucaena and CasfJla, re'\\pectIvelyThe rewlt of the second and third cycle are expected to show the reat effect of the alleys on plantaIn YIeld because the SOlI fertIhty of plots With plantams WIthout al1eys Will be dImtmshmg after every crop cycle From the 1 st cycle results, Leucaena IS better sUlted In alley WIth plantams In the Lower Volcamc zone than CasslQ ---\"------------------------------------------------------------ 6 2420 TLU and ROTREP On-Farm Cassava MulttphcatlOn.Though non-cookable, IRA caliliava vanetIeli are excellent when processed However, their extensIOn to farmerll have not been as rapId all enVISIOned de'\\pIte the hIgh acceptance by TLU contact farmers One of the pnmary rea lions has been the hmlted supply of plantIng matenals compounded by a lack of a clearly defined seed pohcy to encourage the sale of plantmg matenal The tmproved cultIvar should be dIllllemmated all processed food smce they produced 2-3 tImes the YIeld of the local red and whIte cultIvars SInce the technology of some Improved cassava already eXI,\\ts, It was proposed to Increase the number of farmers WIth the Improved cas'\\ava cultIvars by the InttIation of 100 new fdrmers dunng the 1994-95 growmg season The punty of cassava whIch IS vegetatIvely propagated IS assured and farmers WIll retam theIr Improved stock by sImply multIplymg the plantmg materIal WhICh WIll serve as a basIs for commercIalIzatIon of Improved cassava plantIng materIals Two hectares of Improved cassava vanetIes, 8017 and 8034, were therefore, planted on contract m a farmer's field Some of the actIVltIe~ that were undertaken to accomph~h the plantmg actIvItIes mc1ude, locatIng a farm away from the statIon at a convement sIte where damage WIll not occur, partIcularly dunng worker~ strIkes A memorandum of understandmg was SIgned WIth the farmer hefore work was started TLU and ROTREP had to undertake ploughmg, peggmg and plantIng of the plots The cost of these actIvItIes were qUlte hIgh because the farm IS located 4 hours drIve from Ekona Outstandmg actIvItIes mc1ude I weedmg, IdentIficatIon of farmers to commerCIalIze stakes, harvestIng and dIstrIbutIon of the stems 6 2 4 21 AdoptIon, retentIon and dIffusIon of IRA sweet potatoes In order to complete the sefle~ of Impact studIes of tested and dl~tflhuted crop varieties, an Impact study was conducted on sweet potatoes (TIB 1) m 1993 A ltst of 439 users drawn from 31 vIllages across all the dIVISIOns and key zones of the South West provmce was compIled Examples of some of the VIllages enlIsted were ASItata, Weme, Badoma, Ndekwal, Nfianchang, EdJumgang, and Boltfamba One hundred and twenty nme (129) users were mtervlewed IRA sweet potato users attrIbuted theIr mterest m the technology to hIgher yIelds, better taste, early maturmg, large sIzes and mcome generated from sales Rodents were the major bottleneck to sweet potato productIon m the provmce Some farmers reported no tubenzatIon m a sandy zone e g Illoam, better YIeld from locals over IRA (e g Ikthwmdl area), tuber rot and nematode attack Most partIcIpants lIked sweet potato boded AdoptIon rate of 81 %, retentIon, 76% and dIffuSIOn, 65% were estImated (Table 14) A field day held m mid July to explam to farmers, extensIon officer\\, and pohcy makers, TLU's maIze vanetIes, recommended for mtercropped mdlze and caS~dva, maize and Xantho~oma, and maize and colocasla, d'i well ali to demon'itrate fertllizer and allcy hedgerow etteCl\\ attracted mterest dnd enthusla~tIc que~tIon~ from all partIcipants The tdrmer'i were parhlul,n ly Imp' ~\"l-U hy ilK high mal7C poplilat'()n~ m mtercroppmg 'y,tem, dnd wondered what the Yldu, of d\\\\OLldtLU crop, would hl-Our earher trlal\\ ,howed no Il-ductlon m cassaVd or taro Yield at 40,000 mdlze plant' per hd for maize hdfVe~t dS green lobs Thl~ partlcular que~tIon should he answered by a follow up field day at tImes of cassaVd, cocoyam and taro (colocasla) hdfVe~t We dlso mtroduced the Idea ofvldeomg the field ddy by which partlclpant'i would be refre,hed of what they \\aw dunng the field day at time of hdfVe\\tmg crop~ or at dny othl-r time In the wurse of thl-crops' cyclesThe alley system~ were of speCial mtere\\t to the farmers who, after ob~ervlng fertilIzer effects on maize m the demonstration nghtly perceIved the alleys a~ Viable alternatIves to fertIlizer The comparative uI~play~ of fertIhzer effects m close proximity With alley plots and non fertlhzed plots mlrea~ed the enthu'ilasm of farmers for alleys, mdny of who requested tnal alley systems m therr fields On-farm testing withm Maroua TLU consIsted of three levels FIrst, relatively complex technologIes are tested, often under a complex expenmental deSIgn m representauve, observational VIllagesTechnoiogies/practtces WhIch prove adaptable bIOlogIcally and acceptable to farmers are promoted to regIonal testtng (m SImplIfied deSIgn) In 30-40 dispersed SItes to cover a WIde range of condittons Successful technologIes 10 regIOnal tests are then extended to farmers as mmIktts A te\"hnology IS conMdered reddy when acceptabIlIty IS high and a techmcal bulletin IS prepared In 1993, regIOndl teSting was ehmmated and TLU concentrated efforts m three research villages WIth emphaSIS on farmer partIcipatory approach 6 3 2 OBJECTIVES From 1991From -1993 Poor and decrea~Ing ~od fertIhty, aggravated by appreciable ero~lOn abo bmits produ(,tIon and threatens the su~tdmablhty of the ~y~tems Birds cause conSiderable loss to cereals crops, espe<\"lally shorter cycle Improved vanetIes developed to mature early for drought aVOIdance Strlga, a parasItIc weed of cereals, causes senous, though unquantIfied, los~es of sorghum, millet, maize, and to a lesser extent cowpeas Major msect pests and diseases Include gram mold, leaf diseases, Spodoptera SlUh, and head bugs m sorghum, mllbpedes, rosette, rust, and leaf spots m peanut, thriPS and post-harvest pests such as bruchlds m cowpea Only the last two are thought to ment control measures other than development of reslstdnt varietIes Access to credit for seasonal mputs and animal tractIon IS hmlted Flu<..tuallon ot gram pn<..e~ dttec~ both tdfmers' mwme and redu<..e therr abilIty to purchase gram dunng the hungry sea~onTotal ramfall was abnormally high m 1991 (800 to 1100 mm) but distributIon was typlcally poor DlOught penods m June cau~ed severe stress to young sorghum and high humIdity disease pressure In cowpea In 1992 ramfall dl~tnbutIon was so erratic across the regIOnal as to reqUire analysIs of on-fdfm tests to be stratIfied Into dner zones « 700 mm) and more hUmId zones (> 700 mm) In both 1992 and 1993, drought spell~ ocwred In June delaymg plantIng of long cycle varieties Survey results mdicate the followmg (1) there IS Widespread locdl knowledge about soil types and therr uses The maIn reasons for the decrease III sotl fertIhty are contInous cultIvatIon, shorter bush-fallow penods and lack of orgamc matter Countour ndges and use of manure are the most Important traditIonal methods used to mdmt.un (restore) SOlI ferttlIty Mulch farmmg IS hardly understood or prdctI<..ed m the Far North provm<..e (2) Trees are conSIdered useful for firewood, con~tructlOn purpolie~ and provIsion of food ~upplements Most Important trees are Filldherbza alblda, Mangifera mdlca, ZlZlphus mauntama, GUdva, Tamanndus mdlca, Balmues aegypuaca, Lemon, Azadlrachta mdlca (neem), F,cus sp and Khaya senegalenllS (Cdlkedldt) (3) Mo~t wood wttmg tor home wn~umptIon take\\ pldce wlthm 5 km from villdge Wood explOItatIOn I~ hardly controlled m the provmce (4) The use of bush-fallows IS Widespread m North Cameroon, With some reglOndl modIficdtIon to the system Fdllow penod~ range from 3-5 yedrs hut longer pen ods (10 year~) are no exceptIon ill less populated dreas Useful trees (Fwdherbla alblda, Anogel~sus lelOwrpus, etc) are conserved when land l~ put back mto cultivatIon The people 10 the Mandc:lfa mountun~ have developed a very ~ophl~tl( . . dted trcldlUOfldl agrofore~try sy~tem 10 re~pon~e to lugh population denSIties 6 3 4 3 Intercroppmg sorghum and cowpea to stabIlize gram Yield and to reduce stn&a hermonthlcaThe value of ~orghum/cowpea a~~OCldtIon m reducmg stnga mfe~tdtIon, mdmtdmmg higher combmed grdm Yield and en\\unng gredter profltablhty thdn pure ~tands hd~ been confirmed over the ld~t 3 years Inter<..roppmg of sorghum dnd ~preddmg cowped (vyd) m alterndte htlls of the ~dme row Wd~ te~ted on-fdrm from 1989 until 1992 Emerged ~tnga denSity per hectare at sorghum harvest was reduced m all years but reductlon of stnga denMty per sorghum stand wa~ only clearly eVIdent m 1991 Den~lty of emerged strlga dt harve~t was lower on the unproved S35 sorghum vdnety thdn on long lycle mdlgenous Djlgarl vanety ill all years A summary of YIelds m on-farm trIalS IS mdlcdted m T dble 1 Lmd equlvdlent rdtIo (LER) rdnged from lito 1 5 The mdjOr red~on tor farmer adoption of sorghumlwwpea Will mo~t hkely be grdm YIeld stablhzdtIon Best LERs were observed m years which were stressful for the sorghum crop Strlga reduction wlllltkely be a slow process of seed bank reductIon and therefore may not be a mdjOr fdctor m adoptIOn However, whatever grdm Yield ddvantdge oblierved Will be complemented by d forage Yield advantage If sorghum stover dnd cowpea hdY are con\\ldered In seml-dnd northern Cameroon, these by-prodults were tdken mto dcwunt m pdrtldl budget dndly~l~ of the technology because of their Importance as feed In 1991, a wet yedr favorable to long cycle Djlgarl, net benefit from Djlgarl/Vya (396 555 CF A/hd) was only sbghtly better than for pure DJlgarl whIle S35/Vya net benefit (309 290 CFA/hd) was almost tWIce as hIgh dS for pure S35 In 1992, net benefit WdS agdm sub~tdntIdlly hIgher WIth mterlroppmg In 1993, MdroUd TLU emphaSized farmer parttclpatory approach, helpmg farmers m the research Village to understand the bIOlogical process of strlga mfestatIon and addpt thIS technology to theIr own croppmg sy~tem d~ they volunteered to embdrk on d multiyear ~orghumlwwped te\\t 6 3 4 4 Improved practIces to conserve SOlI mOIsture and fertilIty m ramfed sorghumbased systems.Three types of on-farm tests were Implemented from 1991-1993 to dcwmph~h thIS objective (1) 36 Idnd preparatlOn test~ comparmg plowmg and no tIllage techmqueli m 1991 and 1992, (2) 14 te~ts of pigeon ped m a~~ocldtlon With sorghum m 1993 dOd (3) cover crop tests of Mucund for ~Oll regener dtlOn lD two re~edrlh villdges lD 1993The effect of sOlI ulldge (mdm plot dnd 3 ~orghum vdnetIes dt the ~ubplot level) WIth ammal plowmg over dIrect seedmg (no tIlldge) was SignIficant With medn re~pon~es on sorghum gr dm YIelds aver dgmg 54 % acro~s Sl tes m 1991 dnd 32% m 1992 In 1992 medn sod mOIsture content of plowed soil at 30 cm depth, 15 DAP was 29% hIgher than the control whIch ~ugge~ts that plowmg mcreased soIl water avaIlabIlIty dunng edrly growth, thus helpmg the pldnts to aVOId drought ~tre~s In both yedrs the trldl~ were dl~o dndlyzed m term~ of co~~ dnd returns (T dble 2) Re~ults mdIcdte percentage mcredses m gross benefits between plowed dnd non-plowed tredtmen~ of 47, 17 and 52 % for 100 . . als, DJIgdn dnd S35 vanetIes, respectIvely In generdl, the re ... pon~e to plowmg vaned sIgmficdntly WIth the total rainfall both between years dnd dCross sites withm d given season Ammdl plowmg IS u~eful and profitable to fdl mers where dnd when rdmfdll I~ d IUll1ung fdctor lIke m DJoulgouf m 1992The test of pigeon pea m associatIOn With sorghum was Implemented only m 1993 m DJmghya m order to as ... ess thIS yeM effect on ~orghum YIeld dnd make tdrmer~ aWMe of pOSSIble long term advantages of thIS croppmg system (1 e Improved soIl fertIlIty, provlSlon of gram as food) m the Manddra mountdms Results mdIcdte no slgmficant reductIOn of gr dm YIeld m the rows next to the hedgerows Sorghum grdm YIeld WdS 11 % higher from the row near the pIgeon ped thdn three hne') away The ')ame trend WdS observed for the ~tover Yield WIth dnd mcred~e ot 11 5 % The lo~~ of <..ultIvdble ldnd for sorghum due to pigeon ped Wd~ partly compensdted by the slIght mcred~e m sorghum gr dm and stover YIeld ThiS conclusIOn confirms the results of a Simlldf trIal on-~tatIon lfl 1991 More observatIons WIll be made lfl the same field~ m order to bUild a strong Cd ... e for ceredb/plgeon ped d~socidtIon m the regIOn Feedbdck from fdrmers mdlcdte strong preference for ~hort cycle vdnetIe~ of pIgeon ped 6 3 4 5 On-farm vanety teltts (sorghum. peanut and cowped) for lficreased yields, On-1arm te\\tlng of peanut vanetle\\ developed by IRA began m 1990 With IdentlficatIon of vanety M4lo a~ a new ImplOved, \\hurt <.yde ot high gram quality, though Its Yield WdS le'is thdn thdt of 28 206, the mo\\t productive vanety under high ramfall conditIons M416 wa\\ then mcluded m second and third year te\\t\\ With another vanety (K3237-80) of \\l1mla) tIdlt\\ In the la\\t two yt-ar\\, two wntIoh (55 437 and 28 206) were used for two different rdlntdll wndltlon'i m the province (le'i'i thdn dnd gredter thdn 700 mm) The results of the ld\\t two-yedls die \\ummanl.ed m Tdhle 4 None of the new vanetle~ outylelded the fdrmer\\' locab hoth m term\\ of grdm dnd hdY productIon In edch rdmfdll zone, M416 and K32 exhibIted no slgmficant dtfference~ m Yleld~ However, fdrmer'i' dpprecldtIon of the new vdnetIe\\ for high grdm qUdlity (tl\\te and color) have been COn\\l\\tent over the 3 yedr te\\tmg penod Of ~lgmtkdnt Importlnce IS the I high proportion (63%) of fdrmers who mdlcdted then reddme\\'i to ddopt K32 or M416 Smce overall apprecldtton for the Improved check'i (55 437 and 28 206) was lower reldtIve to the new vanetIes, TLU moved M416 and K32 mto mlmklt te\\t\\ m 1993 dlld exten\\lon ledt1et~ hdve been prepdred, while contrdct tdrmer\\ were \\elected to produce \\eed\\ Cowpea There are currently two vanetle'i of cowpea under exten\\lOn m the Fdr North provmce 1 e Vya, a punfjed trddltlOndl vdnety of the ~preddmg type ongmdted from MoutoulOua dnd the Improved, erect BR 1 dt-veloped dt lIT A Both Vdnetles do well m mten\\IVe wltlvdtIon only after 2-3 'iprdymg<; to combdt thnps and hruchldsIn the la\\t 3 yedr'i, two erect lIT A vdnetles were propo\\ed by the IRA wwped ~ectlon for on-farm te\\t'i The\\e were compared to Vya and BRI for only one yedr (1991) Vanetles IT86D364 and lT86D719 did not prove to be well dddpted to the enVironment m .1 high ramfall yedr, re\\ultmg m dn mlred\\ed dl\\ed\\e pre\\~ure m dll the 13 Mtes where they were tested TLU hd\\ reqUired thdt an exten'ilVe multIloedtIondl trldl over 2-3 yeMs be Implemented by the IRA cowpea sectlOn before the new vdfletIes Me te\\ted on-fdrm (m • research villdge~ or m reglOndl te\\ts) One ObVIOUS adv dIltage of the 4 techmques IS that they are withm the capaCIty of the farmers to adopt ExammatIon of the budget for stormg cowpea m ash, trIple bags and 10 bags after solar heatIngs mdicates net benefits rangmg from 8 000-13 500 CF A per farm Net cash benefits after accountIng for Investment m storage eqUlpments amounts to at least 32,000 CFA per farm In terms of extenSIOn, Sodecoton records IndIcate for 1993 that nearly 6000 farmers have partIcipated m the demonstratIon of solar heaters With support from 74 extenSIOn agents (Table 6) The solar heater and trIple baggmg technIques appear to have gone theIr way to adoptIon given the mcreasmg number of farmers who participate m the demonstratIon each year 6 3 4 7 AdoptIon of IRA (Improved) vanetIes and pre-extensIOn of yanetIes and Simple technology components m mmoot tests.Results of formal adoptIon surveys of Improved vanetIes are summanzed m Tables 7 -8 A total of 36 Villages m the cotton growmg zones were selected WIth probabIhty proportIonale to SIZe Fmal sample size was 1008 farmers The percentage of farmers who adopted Improved varIetIes IS much hIgher for cowpea (Table 7) ThIrteen percent of the farmers m the TLU mandate zones have adopted S35 sorghum on 43 % of sorghum holdmgs per adopter As to geographical distrIbutIon, 54 % are located m drought prone areas (Mora-Mokolo zones), 23% m Mayo Danay and 5% m Diamare Farm and farmers' charactenstIcs associated WIth adoptIon were also elUCIdated A stepWIse regreSSIOn analysIS of adoptIon rates (adoptIon of S35 as a package) on selected attrIbutes mdIcates that the area planted to ramy season sorghum (+), to dry season sorghum (-), the number of years the farmers has been plantIng Improved sorghum vanetIes (+) and the ongIn of the vanety contnbuted sIgmficantly to the varIabilIty ill adoptIon rates (R2 = 30%) 9 for maize and peanut Over all appreciatIon was 67% favorable for seed treatment WIth thIoral Research actIvItIes m the reseach Villages Will focus on the agenda for sustamable agnculture Improved cereals/gram legumes aSSOCiatIon, use of cover crops to restore fertIhty on degraded SOlIs, telits of organIC fertIlIzer to combat strlga and mtroductIon of tree/crop associatIons m research VIllages In regIOnal tests, emphaSIS WIll be placed on pre-extensIOn of new Improved varietIes of sorghum, cowpea and peanuts and the mtroductton of multtpurpose trees Farmers' parttclpatton wIll be acttvely sought through the constttutton of thematIc group dISCUSSIons to ensure tImely feedback to on-statIon programs AdoptIon studies and evaluatIon of the economic unpact of agncutural research wlll be a major task to be undertaken by the team's econOmISts DIagnostIc studies are also urgently needed to Improve knowledge and IdentIfy specific constramts of local farmIng systems m the Mayo Tsanaga and Logone et Chan diVISIOns 6 3 7 PLANS TO SUSTAIN RESEARCH EFFORTS WhIle dIagnOStIc studIes and on-statIon research fall withm the realm of IRA, the ~ucce~s of future on-farm teStIng programs WIll depend largely on the collaboratIon WIth extenSIOn agenCIes and the mutually remforcmg nature of onentatIons to be pursued IRA should enact varIous agreements for alternatIve sources of fundmg (Pro]et Garoua, PNVF A) mcludmg cost-shanng arrangements WIth non-governmental organIZatIonS and farmers' groupsThe three-stage approach m on-farm testIng at Maroua (1 e research VIllage mals, regIOnal testIng and mmtktts) allows for alternattve scenarios to be considered For example, WIth reduced fundmg, regIOnal testtng can be eltmInated m favor of mcreased farmers' partICIpatton m the research VIllages The use of low-cost mtmktt tests wIll mcrease demonstratIon value and allow for farmer to farmer transmiSSIOn of SImple Improved technologIes, thus mcreasmg the Impact of research IndIVIdual researchers should also be encouraged to submIt research proposals and grant apphcattons to mternattonal agencies Reseach eqUlpments (laboratory eqUlpments, vehIcles, photocopIers, computers, etc) -------------------Year -------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.--- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Graln valued at 55 CFA/kg at harvestlng Table 3 Average graIn and stover YIeld (kgfha) of sorghum In on-fara regIonal varIetIes trIals over two years (1991,1992) GraIn ( 47 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- ------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DUrIng the three 3 yedrs, TLU has carned out surveys, on-farm and on-statIon tnals Surveys were of two types rapId rural appraIsals (2) and resource momtormg surveys (3) On ~tdtlon dctlvIues were on (l) evaludtlon of benefits from legummous hedgerows, (2) IdentIficatIon of specIes and plactlces for legume fallow The on-farm program focused on varIetal testIng (maIze, cassava), soIl fertIlIty Improvement (mIneral and legume fallow) Trammg seSSIOns of MINAGRI extensIOn agents were held dUd the lInkage between them and researchers has been strengthenedIn 1991, a VIllage-level resource management survey has been carned out ill thIrty-one VIllages of the South and Center Provmces The findmgs of thIS aCtlvltlty may be found m the EconomIc AnalysIs Umt sectlon In 1992, a retentIOn survey on Improved maIze and cassava was Implemented It Involved 298 households selected from 3 TLU vIllages and 5 non-TLU VIllages MaIze VarIetIes subjected to farmers appraIsal were CMS-8704, CMS-8501, CMS-8806 and Ndock-8701 Cassava vanetIes were 8034, 8017, and 80651 Survey results show that about twothirds of farmers have grown one or more IRA varieltIes Of these, 92 % responded they have been groWIng CMS-8704, followed by eMS-8501 25%, Ndock 17%, and CMS-8806 5% (Table 1) Most farmers In the surveyed VIllages prefer IRA varIetIes for theIr taste (mostly CMS-8704), more thdn fifty percent of farmers (62 %) grow those vartetles for YIeld, only 57% plant them for earlIness Locatlon and, personal charactenstIcs affect adoptIon and retentIon (Table 2) Farmers hvmg m Villages where on-farm research has been earned out were strongly mfluenced toward adoptlon and retentIOn Women showed more mterest than men III Jdoptmg dnd retlInmg Improved maIZe vanetIes Young and educated farmers are highly receptlve to new technologies A maJonty of farmer~ mentIoned lack of seeds as the number one reason for not adoptmg or plantIng Improved vanetIes all seasons The survey also showed that women give a relatIvely higher Importance to taste color and cob SIze (1 e consumptlOn and marketIng qualItIes), whIle men's Intere~t IS productlOn performance (yIeld, matunty dates)The survey findmgs showed that only 14 percent of households planted Improved VarIetIes In TLU Villages, 22 % responded that they had planted on IRA varIety Of these, 97% planted 8034 About two-thIrds of farmers responded that the IRA vanety had a bigger lilze Farmers preferred the local varIety for Its YIeld (59%), color (73%), and taste (95%) The IRA varIety (8034) IS prefelfed only when It IS cooked and eaten as foufou In 1993, dn mput-output study was carned out In order to construct crop enterpnse budgets for maIze and groundnut croppmg systems The objectIves were 1)to define resources aVailable to the farmer and the socio-economIc envrronment of maize and groundnut bdsed croppmg systems m the Centre and South ProvInces, 2)To determme the cost of productlOn mputs and prodUCtIVItyTo develop enterpnse budgets for maIZe and groundnut based croppmg systems 120 farmers were randomly selected (20 per VIllage where the TLU IS mvolved)Survey results lihowed that m the forest-savanna tranSItIon zone tools and land preparatIon methods vary from farmer to farmer WIth the type of vegetatIon and crop rotatIon or sequence withm rotatIOn Ten percent (10%) use cutlass, 7% hoe, 42% cutlass and file, 24 % cutlass and hoe, 17 % cutlass, hoe and file In thIS zone 69 % of farmers mcorporate dned vegetatIon while 21 % burn It The remammg portIon burn and remove branches Most farmers plant local materIalli of unknown ongm Mean maize, cassava and plantaIn denSItIes m momtored fields were 5625 pldn~/ha, 6875 4910 plants/ha, respectIvelyThe mean labor utIlIzation elitlmates by operation are presented m Table 3 and 4 Women contrIbuted for 23% of labor for land clearIng, men for 28% and 11 % for chtldrenThe productIVIty of lahor I~ 5 5kg of maize per mm day 10 the maIze based system whIle It IS 1 18 kg of maize and 2 86 kg of groundnut per man day m the groundnut based system ProductIon factors for maIze based and groundnut based croppmg systems mclude variable phYSical cost~ (lieeds), labor and land Money IS requrred to purchase seed (maIze and groundnutli) Land I~ tnhented or borrowed from other farmers Seed costs are the market pnce at plantIng tIme Land and famIly labor are the final reSidual factors EnterprIse budgets for the 2 cropptng ~y~tems cannot be presented now, smce tuber Yields are stIll awaited Two rapId rural apprallial surveys were conducted 10 1993 10 two VIllages (Engom I and NdJazeng) of the South Provtnce to charactenze productIon systems, to IdentIfy productIon constramts and potentIals and to determme research pnontIes A multIdlsCIphnary team of eleven SClentllits carrIed out the surveys The survey revealed that there were three major cropp 109 sy~tem~ m the two VIllages the 'eguIiI' melon based system, the groundnut based farms and the Cd';';ava bdsed system The dS~ocidted crops were maIze, cocoyam, plantam, sweet potato, yam~, and Ca\"l~dVd dependmg on the systems Livestock was not Integrelted In the sy~tem The tedm recommended to Introduce an Improved fallow system usmg legumes (herbdceou,; or tree) m order to reduce pressure on vrrgm forests, to breed for dIsease resIst.ant VdfletJeS of groundnut and cassava The objective wa~ to determme Yields and economIC benefits of hybnd maize relatIve to the best avaIlable open-pollIndted VdrIetles at dIfferent fertIlIty levels The tnal was planted at two SItes (MInkomeyo'), NtUl) and dunng the first and second season of 1991 and 1992 The varIetIes were hybnd,; (8321-18 land 8644-31), and open-pollInated (eMS 8501, and eMS 8704) The fertll11:er level,; were 00, 60,0, 120,0, and 120,90 N and P, respectIvely The resulh show thdt hyhnd mdlze vanetIes had neither YIeld nor economIC benefit over the open pollInated vanetIes at dll fertIlIty levels (Table 5) Based on two-year results, eMS-8501 and CMS-8704 are as good as the currently available hybnd maIze varieties (8321-18 and 8644-31) Small-scale farmers who are market onented, are better off With these open-pollmated vanetIes than attemptmg to change over to hybnd maIze vanetIesThe objectIve ofthl'; study was to momtor naturalmfestatIon In 3 agroecologlcal zones so as to gather baselIne InfOrmatIOn relatIve to the onset of borer mfestatIon, evolutIon, seventy, etc In relatIOn to crop growth In eelch 10CdtIon DetaIled descnptIon of methods and results can be found In the entomology sectIon of thiS report Improved fdHow mandgement for SOIl fertthty dod weed cootrolThe cultivatIon of legumInOus planted fallow In the alternate season IS expected to restore the nutrIent status of SOIls by addmg bIOlogIcally fixed N, to suppress the growth of weeds, and to reduce SOli ero\"llOn, Se'lbama se!Jban and Mimosa mVlsa var mermlS were planted as fallow specIe') to add bIOlogICdlly fixed N and suppress the growth of weeds m maIze The trIal was e~tabhshed dt Mmkomeyos and NtUl Legume specIes were planted m March 1990 WIth maIze A spltt-plot deSIgn was used WIth four replIcations The mam plots were fallow and reSIdue management cOmbInatIOns, and sub-plots were zero and 60 kg N/ha The three-year result\"l show that Incorporated MImosa or Sesbama YIelded more than mulch at NtUl where soil fertIlIty IS reldtIvely low At Mtnkomeyos, the use of Sesbama IS not apparently Justified, smce the natural fdlIow plot YIelded better than Sesbanla's The effect of fertIhzer on maIze gram YIeld was sIgmficant at both sites and durmg the three years Weed bIOmass at three weeks dfter pIdntIng was lower m plo~ where reSIdues were mcorporateed at Ntul The findmgs suggest thdt, Mimosa and SesbanIa fallow lOcorporated can effectively Improve SOli fertility and suppress weeds CaSSIa Mulch/Green Manure TndJ Thl~ tI Id] hd~ been planted tur three yed! ~ A legume tI ee, Cassla speaabllis IS a naturallzed tree 11mt grows well m the t()re~t-trdn\\ltIon lone The objectIve of the tna] wa'i to produce N-nch orgdnIC mdtter for \\0l11ertillty ImplOvement A \\pht-plot design was used WIth the mdm plots bemg tree arrangement and the subplots con'il\\ung of maIze/natura] fallow, maIze, De~mod1Um fdllow, dnd ~oybcdn/mall;e CasSia was well e'itabhshed at both slte~ Tree arrangement dId not slgmficantly affect bIOmaS\\ productIOn, and therefOI e dId not mfluence maIze gram YIeld at eIther Mmkomeyo'l or Ntm durmg the three yedrs However, at NtUl 11l 1993, there was d slgmficant dIfference hetween fallow tredtments dnd soybean At NtUl the cumulatIve effect of Cassla mulch pIu\\ De ... modlUm fallow plots yIelded 1317-302 kg/ha more maIze than soybean plot... NdturJI tallow plOb pwdull.d 847-302 kg/ha more mdIze than soybean plots (p = 00013) On-farm Tnals On-fa lIn dltlvltles of the umt dUllng the three years (1991 to 1993) hdve fow~sed mamly on technoiogy evaluauon and a~~~ '~ment of crop protectIon pract1<..e'i One of the constramts fdcmg th~ farmer IS a ldck of high Yleldmg vanetIes, therefore the IdentIficdtIon of well addpted ,mt! dClcptJble varletJ.C\\ Wd\\ obJeltIve number one The eVdludtIon ot benefits from legummoJs hedgerows to dlleviate a soil ferttlIty constraInt was necessary Mmeral feItti.zdtlOn of maIze WdS equdlly Important Farmer IDalLe vanety tests Pronmll1g vdflctIe\\ from the Lowldnd Breedmg PlOgram are handed to the TLU tor on-farm testlng s B ~Olls ThIS mdY be too expenslve for farmer\". given the tllgh co\"'t~ of P fertJ.llzer~ (240 000 CFAlton), vis-a-vIs the current farm gene pfll.e\\ ot dgl1lUlLUrdl commodltIe~ Howl.ver, experIences here and ehewhere have ~hoVvn trdt crops apd crop Vdnetle~ differ III theIr P reqUlrements For lllstance, cassava and some mdize vant-tIes thnve and produce reasonable Yields at levels of solution P much lower than the \"stdndard\" a 2 ppm Orgamc carbon correlates pOSItIvely and strongly WIth effectIve catIon exchange capacIty (ECEC) m most SOlIs of the trOpICS ThIS relatIOnshIp was valId for only the class A SOlIs WIth relatively low DCBFe 2 0 3 and DCBAI l 0 3 values It did not hold for the class B sods where hIgher values of Fe l 0 3 and A1 2 0 3 , and low pH values were recorded ThIS supports the mSlgmficant role of orgamc matter WIth respect to ECEC Improvement m aCId SOlIs hIgh llliron and alummum OXIdes From a management standpomt, our results mdlcate that low pH, htgh P fixatIOn, and Alummum tOXICIty are among the most Important lImItIng factors to crop productIon m these SOlIs Phosphorus plays a key role m symbIOtIc mtrogen fixatIon, therefore, for a bIOlogICal N fiXIng system such as Agroforestry to be successful, adequate P fertIhzatIon must be ensured As well, lImmg may be needed to raIse the soIl pH to levels where Al and Fe tOXl(.ItIes WIll not be detnmental to crop growth FIeld ob~ervatIOns revealed WIdespread N defiCIency on maIze despIte the hIgh correlatIon between orgamc carbon and total N (r=O 81 **) The problem was more pronounced m the hIgher elevatIons where soIl organIc matter (SOM) was relatIvely hIgh ( > 7 0 % ) ThIS, therefore, bnngs mto questIon the qualIty of the soli orgaruc matter Recent 2 Bnefly, exchangeable alummum correlated negatIvely With legume biomass whereas baSIC catIons (Ca, Mg and K) were eIther pOSItIvely and strongly or weakly correlated CorrelatIon between legume blOmass and phosphorus was not Slgmtkant From the above, It IS ObVIOUS that legumes generally performed better on the non-aCIdIC and rugh base status soIls at Foumbot, Babungo and Befang than on the aCId and mferule ~01ls at Nkwen and Mfonta Thus, green manunng WIth some of these legumes alone would not be effective m correctmg the aCId mfertIhty of sOlIs at Nkwen and Mfonta Crotalana and to a le';ser degree Mucuna appeared to be stable across locatIons as mdicated by theIr pOSItIve and hIgh mtercepts and moderate ~lope~ (Table 3) Even though unproductIve at poor SItes, (negatIve mtercepts) MImosa LnVISa and Desmodium Lntortum portrayed the tendency to produce hIgh bIOmass at good SItes The legumes WhICh produced COpIOUS bIOmass were also effectIve as weed suppressants (r = 079) MaIze Immediately followmg the mcorporated legume green manure outyleided that m the morgantc-fertIlIzed plots where maize followed maIze (Table 4) MaIze YIeld was hIghly correlated WIth P+Ca contnbutIon of the legumes (r=O 90, P< =0001) II 2-Shrub Legumes ThIS study compared growth and bIOmass YIelds of five speCIes under mtensive prunIng management The followmg speCIes were tested Leuwella leucocephala, Callzandra calothyrsus, Erythnna sp , AlblZla sp , and Mellwa sp The ~hrubs were cutback at 7 MAP and every three month~ thereafter Leucaena and Calhandra grew more rapIdly, followed by AlbizIa, MelhtIa and Erythrma BIOmass productIon was hIghest for Calhandra, followed by Leucaena, Erythrma, AlbizIa, and MelhtIa Wood weIght at 7 MAP was hIghest for Calhandra, followed by Leucaena and Albizia Leucaena leucocephala (Leucaena) IS preferred for dgro[ore~try In the mId-altItude (600-1600m) agroecologlcal zone of North-West Cameroon mo<.,tly be(\"du~e 1t I~ precocIOus But Its growth IS slow on aCId InfertIle soIls Thus, we ~et out to te~t whether or not dpphcatIOn of farm manure could stImulate early growth and con~equently reduce the estabh~hment phase of Leucaena Begmmng four months after pldntmg, the I)hrub was cut 5 tImes In 20 months at 4 months Intervals Manunng Improved rhlzo~phere fertIhty (r> 0 80) and resulted m mcreased growth and bIOmass YIeld BIOma~s at 12 months was hIghly correlated WIth rhlzosphere Ca and P (r=O 99, Ppectlvely, reldtIve to the control plou, WIthout shrubsThe regrowth cut a year later, gave ~Igmficantly (P < a 00 I) hIgher bIOmass for C.:lS~ld than Leucaena Compared to the two outer row~, the regrowth bIOmass m the mner row was reduced by about 15% as opposed to 55% dt cutbdck III-Sod FertIhty Management III 1-Amendment of ACId Sods WIth Green Manure, Farm M~.tnure clnd Phosphorus Callzandra dnd Tephrowa dre Importdnt ,>otl-Improvmg legume 'ipeue\\ III N W Cdmeroon CalLtandra, a perenmdl, Ldn he cutbdck dnd pruned penodlCdlly to ~upply green manure for crop productIOn on a sustamed ba'iIS Tephro\\la, an annual, under normdl COndItIOnS, YIelds more bIOmass than Callzandra at cutback But, observatIons m the field mdicated that estab~shment of Tephrosza I~ so erratIc that It Cdnnot be depended upon to proVIde green manure on a regular baSIS Green mdIlures dnd fMm manures are major sour(..es ot mtrogen but poultry manure supplIes substanttal amounts of calCIUm and phosphorus as well In addItton, both manures enhance P aVailabIlIty m the soIl by complexmg exchangeable and soIl solutton alummum The purpose of thIS expenment WdS to study the effect of Calbandra and Tephrosza green manures, poultry manure dnd pho'iphorus on YIelds of maIze and beans on an aCId and mfertIle soIlThe shrubs were planted m May 1991 and cut for u\\e ali green manure dunng the next croppmg season m March 1992 Leafy btOmd'iS was 1 1 tlha for Callwndra dnd 2 5 tlha tor 1 ephrosw When maIze Wd\\ pldnted, TephrO\\ta Wd~ re,>eeded hut germmdtIOn dIld sub~equent growth were extremely poor MaIze YIeld m the first ~ea<,on was hIghe\\t m the Tephrosza plot\\ dnd lowest III the Callzandra plot'i (Table 6) HIgh maIze YIeld m the Tephrosza plots wa\\ attrIbuted to It~ mItlal hIgh blOma~~ productIOn and relat.ed nutrIent contributton compared WIth that of CaUwndra MaIZe III the Tephrosw plots dId not suffer from shadmg because of the poor germIllatton but malze plants III the Callwndra plots were excessIvely shaded by the regrowth smce no prumng wa'i done III the course of the growmg season The SItuatIon was reversed m the second season (September to December) when regrowth from Callzandra was pruned and mcorporated m the ~Oll a\\ a green manure BIOmass YIeld of Calltandra regrowth was 4 4 tlha and zero tor Tephro!>w due to the poor germmatIOn Consequently, second ~eason bean YIeld (Table 7) and bIOmass were hIghest m the Callwndra plot~ ApplIcatIOn of pOUltry manure promoted vegetatIve growth of food crops to the detnment of gram YIeld In plot'> ftrtlhzed WIth pho~phoru\\ Even though prehmmary, the re~ults amply demon~trate the long-term advantage at u~Illg Callzandra as opposed to Tephrosza bIOma~~ a~ a low-cost amendment for soIl fertIlIty management III 2-Tephrosla dnd Crotalana as Supplemental sour(.e~ of NItrogen In a MaIze-basedCroppIng System In Ndop PlaIn, N W Cameroon PrevIous research IdentIfied TephroslQ vogelll dnd Crotalana juncea, among otherl), al) potentIal sOlI-lmprovmg legummous specIes m the Western HIghlands However, empmcal data are hmIted and the conditIons mfluencmg the performance of thel)e legumes may vary with agroecologlldl mche') and cultural prdctlces Thl ... remam ... to he determmed m Ndop Plam, WhICh IS one of the major agroecologlcal zones In N W Cameroon ThiS study was de,)lgned to quantIfy N fertIlIzer replacement values of the two fallow ~pecles USIng matze (Zea Mays) and heans (Phaseolus Vulgan~), WhICh dommate the croppmg ~ystems In the area Accordmg to the SOlI fertIlity UItlfld, the ~Olb 01 the tflal \"'Ite are ~ufficient m hd~lC catIOns but defiCient In avaIlahle P NItrogen leaches rdpldly dnd II) generally lImItIng WIthOut the regular use of N fertIlIzers BIOmass YIelds of hoth legume~ were suppressed m the hIgh N plots when' maIze grew better and gdve hIgher YIelds MaIze dnd beans responded to N fertIlIzer ill the first season but the Yleldl) were depressed m the GML plots WIth no N ThIS ImplIes competItIon for lImIted sod N m the GML plots WIthout N Because the competItIOn seems to dIsappear WIth Increasmg N rates, It may be deSIrable to apply a starter N of 30-60 kg/ha to offset the ohserved Yield drop In the second season, hean growth wa ... slgmficantly hetter (P < 0 01) m the TephrosIa than m the Crotaland and natural fallow plotl) Bean Yield wal) hlghe~t m Tephrosla plots and lowest m the Crotalana plotl) though the dIfference was not \"'Igmficant (P> 0 05) Matze and hean YIelds In the thIrd season were sIgmficantly (P < 0 05) hetter m the green manured plot ... than In the natural fallow Matze growth rate at 60 kg N/ha m the prevIOUS Tephrosla plot was as good as that WIth 120 kg N/ha In the sole matze plots MaIze YIeld dunng the thIrd season was slgmficantly better (P < 0 01) m the green manured plots than m the control Compared WIth the control, Tephro~lQ gave a maIze YIeld moease of 42% and Crotalana of 67 % m the zero N plots It appears from our results that the Improved fallow speCIes would be able to stabIlIze SOlI fertIlIty and pOSSIbly satIsfy 30-50% of the maIze N fertIhzer reqUIrement III 1-[~ffects of Greeo MdOUf(. dod Pho~phoru~ 00 Crop Yleld~ 10 a HIgh P )- 0 05) On the whole, the mtercropped soybean yIelded poorly and wa~ VIrtually smothered hy Mucuna Mdlze and bean YIeld ... after the mcorporatlOn of legume bIOmass were consIstently hIgher m the Mucuna plots (Table 8) Our results supported the hypotheSIS that crop reqUlrement~ for fertIhzer P could he reduced hy about 50% wIth the U'ie of Mucuna green manure whIch supplIed fl1trogen a'i well Howevet, we noted thdt re\\prouted Mucund ~eed\\ ~mothered the mdIze In addItIOn, bIrds and rats harbored m the Mucuna \"bush\", destroyed the malze, causmg further YIeld losses Perhaps, a thrrd weedmg m the Mucund plots could hdve le'isened the problem but thI~ dlso ImplIes addItIonal productIOn co~t III 4-Phosphorus Management III ACId and High P FIxmg SOlis Crops and crop vanetIes dIffer m theIr P reqUIrements ThIS expenment was a second phase of the SIte charactenzatlOn study P sorptIon curves were med to calculate fertIlIzer P rates needed to obtam 0,0 05,0 1,0 15, and 02 ppm Pm SOlI 'iolutIon The 20 tlha hme used was based on Kamprath' s prOpOSItIOn that 1 65 tlha of calcitiC lImestone are needed to neutralIze 1 0 meq/100g of Al m the exchange complex Te'it crops were maIze, beans and potatoes ApplIcatIon of hme SIgnIficantly (P < 0 01) Improved the yleld~ of all crops m the first and second seasons Beans responded to hme more than potato and maIze (Table 9) LIme applIcatIon doubled bean YIeld dunng the second season when ~otl mOIsture was hmItmg ThIS may be attrIbuted to better rootmg of the beans m the hmed plots Our results also mdIcated that hIgh P rates were unnecessary when hme was applIed Smce lIme IS generally cheaper than P fertIhzers, we would encourage Its use to lower aCIdIty and enhance P avaIlabilIty on the hIgh P fixmg SOlIs InItIal maIze growth Wd\\ hetter III the SIX month~ than the 12 months fdllow but the dIfference was not reflected m the YIelds which were not SIgnIficantly dIfferent (P> 0 05) However, there was a SignIficant respome to N (P hIgher In W 20% del área total destinada para ganadería• En los últimos 10 años tendencia a aumentos significativos en producción• Mayor expansión en producción basada en aumento de hato y áreas de pastoreo, baja tasa de crecimiento en productividad• 86% de fincas ganaderas son sistemas familiares, agricultura + ganadería, mano de obra familiar Herramienta CLEANED: evaluación ex-ante de impacto ambiental -sistemas de ganadería "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3609089743.json b/main/part_2/3609089743.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9b4cd8f5549c6a727df51571a8655e22546be56 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3609089743.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0e72d910ecce54d4024728ad7769e9cd","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b2ef0a80-47fe-4d62-aa14-527de0ad8027/retrieve","id":"-696385527"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"82c9274f-dc6b-497a-9edb-a53a6a358845","content":"In 2023, the Nigeria Potato Seed Security Partnership (NPSSP) successfully introduced four new late blight-resistant and climate-smart potato varieties to Nigeria. This will enhance local capacity within the public and private sectors to ensure an adequate supply of high-quality seed potato that meets market demands and is adapted to local conditions.Potato (Solanum tuberosum) is the world's third most important crop in terms of consumption after rice and wheat (FAOSTAT 2013). It is a tuber crop that belongs to the nightshade family and is vegetatively propagated which means that new plants are grown from tubers and not from botanical seed.Potatoes have high nutrient content, can adapt to marginal environments, and are relatively easy to cultivate. Combined with their low cost and high productivity, these attributes make potatoes one of the most important sources of food and income for vulnerable populations in low-and middle-income countries. In 2021, 154 countries produced potatoes (FAOSTAT), and more than a billion people eat them regularly, often when other crops are scarce. In the last decade potato was the sixth most produced crop globally accounting for 4% of all crop production (FAO 2022), and more than half of global production today comes from lowand middle-income countries (FAOStat 2005), where there are often high levels of poverty, hunger, and malnutrition.With more than 50 years of research-for-development work in potato, CIP has contributed to greater food and nutrition security and economic growth around the world. Our breeders and plant scientists work with local partners and farmers to develop and manage potato varieties to produce higher yields, improve nutrition and build resilience to climate change, and pest and disease outbreaks. More than two million smallholder farmers in Africa and Asia have planted quality seed of improved potato varieties and adopted good practices -with support provided by CIP working with partners -resulting in increased yields and incomes including at least 600,000 smallholder farmers in Africa through seed-related businesses and three million households through potato technologies.Rapid multiplication: Increasing farmer access to quality seed helps to combat the spread of viruses that reduce yields. Rooted apical cuttings -small plantlets that are used to produce high-quality seed -is a rapid low-cost multiplication approach that is helping many farmers in India and Africa, including 50,000 farmers in Kenya, boost yields and incomes by as much as 50%. cip-cpad@cgiar.org www.cipotato.org @cipotato @Cipotato @cip_potatoThe International Potato Center (CIP) was founded in 1971 as a research-for-development organization with a focus on potato, sweetpotato and Andean roots and tubers. It delivers innovative science-based solutions to enhance access to affordable nutritious food, foster inclusive sustainable business and employment growth, and drive the climate resilience of root and tuber agri-food systems. Headquartered in Lima, Peru, CIP has a research presence in more than 20 countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America.CIP is a CGIAR research center, a global research partnership for a food-secure future. CGIAR science is dedicated to transforming food, land and water systems in a climate crisis. Its research is carried out by 13 CGIAR Centers/Alliances in close collaboration with hundreds of partners, including national and regional research institutes, civil society organizations, academia, development organizations and the private sector.Agroecological shifts: Potato in mulch is a regenerative approach that is being promoted and refined by CIP in India and Bangladesh. Seed potatoes are laid directly onto untilled soil and covered with leftover straw mulch from the rice harvest. This approach is appealing to young entrepreneurs including women as it has low production costs as requires few inputs like water, fertilizers, and drought. It also brings quick returns which reduces risks -the harvest is ready in about three months, in time for the next crop to be planted. Climate-smart: Across Asia, 170 potato varieties have been released either through the International Potato Center's breeding program over the last four decades or by using germplasm held in its collections. These varieties are bred to be climate-smart, to mature, and to help fight off potato pests and diseases, contributing to the food and nutrition security, and the livelihoods, of 10 million people across Asia.Targeting nutrition: CIP has made significant advances towards developing biofortified potatoes with elevated levels of zinc and iron to help plug micronutrient gaps in malnourished vulnerable populations.Potato has a rich genetic diversity with nearly 5,000 native edible varieties and 145 wild species still found in its centre of origin. Almost 8,000 years ago, farmers first domesticated the potato wild relatives growing around Lake Titicaca in the Andean highlands in southeast Peru and eastern Bolivia. Its popularity grew as a combination of genetic selection, breeding, and adaptation resulted in varieties that had the right tastes and textures to be adopted into traditional food cultures and that could tolerate and adapt to the challenging local conditions. Farmers in the Andean region work in altitudes above 4,000m on a mix of terrains including severe slopes and wetlands and face unpredictable weather patterns from frosts to droughts. This resulted in the rich genetic heritage that makes the potato an ideal candidate for innovative conservation and breeding programs such as those led by CIP. These programs bring new techniques to build on ancient know-how to fast-track the release of new and improved varieties that vulnerable farmers urgently need, for example, resistance to new crop pests, or increased tolerance to drought. When combined with initiatives to build farmers' capacity in using good agricultural practices, they can help boost food security, provide inclusive livelihoods, and reduce the use of water, pesticides, and fertilizers, safeguarding both human and planetary health.In 2021, global potato production passed 376 million tonnes with almost 86 million tonnes coming from low-income food-deficit countries -more than half of this production came from low-to middle-income countries in South America, Africa, and Asia, including Central Asia, where potato is a key food security crop for millions of people facing high levels of poverty, hunger, and malnutrition. Selected over centuries for their taste, texture, shape, and color, potato is well-adapted to harsh conditions like those that prevail in the high Andes, at altitudes ranging from sea level to 4,200 meters, requiring little or no agrochemicals. This means that is it well-positioned to help farmers sustainably tackle the challenges they face today, boosting human and planetary health.Potatoes are eaten by more than one billion people around the world and are a valuable source of nutrition in many lowand middle-income countries. Research is also underway to increase the vitamin content of modern potato varieties, using biotechnology to target micronutrient deficiencies.It is estimated that between 690 and 783 million people in the world faced hunger in 2024.In low and middle income countries, production rose from less than 30 million tonnes in the early 1960s to more than 165 million tonnes in 2007 (FAOStat 2007). Until the early 1990s, most potatoes were grown and consumed in Europe, North America, and countries of the former Soviet Union.One-third of the world's potatoes are produced in China and India.Potatoes have an average crop cycle of 100-120 days and farmers in the tropics can harvest potato crops within 70-80 days of planting with new varieties. This means that farmers can benefit from quick returns and reduced risks of crop loss.In highland areas of southern Asia, the potato is emerging as an off-season crop;planted in rotation with maize, it brings relatively high prices at the market. Similarly, across other areas of the world, the potato's importance as a winter cash crop is rising considerably.One hectare of potato can yield two to four times the food quantity of grain crops.The potato value chain in Kenya alone employs around two million people and contributes approximately USD 500 million to the annual economy.Potatoes produce more calories per unit of water than most other crops including some major cereal crops. As climate change alters rainfall patterns, that characteristic becomes increasingly important for farmers. A combination of optimal water management and droughttolerant varieties can greatly enhance water resilience meaning it could be cultivated in regions where little or no food is currently grown.Wild species are found from the southwestern United States to southern Chile where they grow in diverse soils and climates, from the dry desert along the Peruvian coast to the inter-Andean valleys. These species may hold the genetic keys to developing new and improved nutritious, disease-and climate-resilient varieties to help farmers build resilience to today's challenges.Losses and management of diseases like late blight -the one which caused the Irish Potato Famine and still devastates crops today. In 2022 alone, it caused an estimated global loss of $6.7 billions in yield losses and management costs, wiping out entire harvests of subsistence farmers who depend on potato for their food security and livelihoods. In sub-Saharan Africa, it causes an estimated 15 -30 percent average yield loss on smallholder farms.Climate change is reducing yields through increased drought and erratic weather patterns that can destroy entire harvests.Warmer temperatures also mean that diseases like late blight are spreading into higher altitudes in traditional potato-growing areas that historically have been free of the disease. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3615608944.json b/main/part_2/3615608944.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a3dabeb58a18a1b7b36989e81ce28b7bae921fc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3615608944.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"27d22698dda7d3dbef5d1baf20b33965","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/0e3451ad-eb9f-448a-b383-028938929bec/retrieve","id":"-338055953"},"keywords":["Pastoralists","Climate change","Index insurance"],"sieverID":"cbe04943-8c0b-4b09-baae-68d33a8fee08","content":"The views expressed in this document cannot be taken to reflect the official opinions of these agencies, nor the official position of the CGIAR or ESSP.Matthew Hurst holds an M.S. Civil and Environmental Engineering and is currently a doctoral student in the field of Environmental Processes the school of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Matt's research interests include developing appropriate bottom geometry in upflow sedimentation tanks to optimize floc blanket formation and identification of water quality, and risk factors and interventions for the prevention of cryptosporidiosis in people and livestock in Ethiopia. Contact: mwh65@cornell.edu Nathan Jensen holds an M.S. in Agricultural Economics and is currently a doctoral student in the field of Applied Economics and Management in the Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management. Nathan's research focuses on the dynamics between the livelihood strategies of households in underdeveloped countries and their social and natural environment. Contact: ndj6@cornell.edu Sarah H. Pedersen holds an M.S. in Food Policy and Applied Nutrition and is currently a doctoral student in the field of Nutrition with a concentration in International Nutrition.Sarah's dissertation work is investigating infection-mitigating mechanisms of breastfeeding as a pathway to healthy infant growth and development in Tanzania. Contact: sp7292@cornell.edu Asha N. Sharma holds an M.S. in Biological and Environmental Engineering and is currently pursuing a doctoral degree in the same field. Asha is studying climate-related changes in precipitation and consequences on crop yields, water balances of major river basins, and longterm changes in groundwater in India as part of her dissertation research. Contact: ans62@cornell.edu Jennifer A. Zambriski is a U.S. licensed veterinarian (D.V.M.) specializing in Global Health.She is currently pursuing a doctoral degree in the field of Animal Science with a concentration in Epidemiology (PhD expected 2012). Jenni's dissertation research is focused on development of a bovine vaccine against Cryptosporidium parvum, and on identification of risk factors and interventions for the prevention of cryptosporidiosis in people and livestock in Ethiopia. Contact: jzambriski@gmail.comThe IGERT team would like to thank the Boran people, in particular the focus group discussion participants, for sharing their views and wisdom. We would like to thank all of the government officials, nongovernment organization (NGO) workers, researchers and others who took the time to meet with us and share their experiences and observations freely. In addition, we would like to express profound gratitude to our three wonderful field facilitators and translators, Seyoum Tezera, Mohamed Ibrahim, and Fatima.The IGERT team is also indebted to Birhanu Taddesse Ayana of ILRI in particular for his field program facilitation during our time in Borana, which enabled us to learn a great deal about the place, the people, and the culture. The team also wishes to thank Brenda Wandera of ILRI, Aliyu Mustafa of CARE, and Dr. Beth Medvecky, Ginny Montopoli, and Tina Henry of Cornell University for their flawless logistical support as well as Cynthia Mathys for her wonderful editorial contributions and insightful comments that served to transform and unify a very rough first draft.We are also most grateful to Dr. Charles Hopkins of CARE for setting us on track for this study upon our arrival in Addis Ababa and helping to clarify concepts and to spur new ideas.And, to Dr. Solomon Desta and Dr. Getachew Gebru of MARIL, who provided advice on sources of information, and went above the call of duty to help us access these sources. Their comments, along with those of Dr. Andrew Mude of ILRI, greatly helped us revise this report.To the National Science Foundation and the Food Systems and Poverty Reduction IGERT, our sincere appreciation for your continued demonstrated commitment to and investment in the scientific, academic, and professional development of all the students you support, and in particular the IGERT students at Cornell University.And lastly, to our leader and mentor, Dr. Chris Barrett, for his unwavering patience, his sage advice, and his indefatigable encouragement. By providing us with this opportunity, he has given us the chance to put his many good lessons into practice, and we hope that we have honored those lessons justly. Through his work and mentorship he has inspired us, and for this above all else, we are thankful. The Horn of Africa is currently experiencing a drought that is projected by organizations such as the United Nations and the World Bank to be the worst in the region in nearly six decades.Over the last decade, drought has recurred in southern Ethiopia more frequently and for longer periods than documented previously. The region's changing climate has resulted in diminished quantity and quality of local water and forage resources, thereby severely and negatively impacting the region's livestock and the nomadic pastoralists, such as the Boran, who depend on these animals for livelihoods and subsistence. Lower than average rainfall in 1999-2005 (Conway and Schipper, 2010) and again in 2011 have caused mass die-offs of livestock, and have forced Boran pastoralists to adopt new coping mechanisms to manage increased risks associated with the region's changing climate. Although new coping strategies may enable the Boran to better adapt to new or more severe climate-related events, stress and hardship for Boran pastoralists are likely to continue, or even increase, as climate scientists project increasingly frequent and severe drought events in the Borana region of southern Ethiopia (Ellis and Gavin, 1994). From focus group discussions with the Boran, there is a consensus that the Boran possess cultural values that include strong kinship ties, migratory livestock herding, and a multifaceted political and cultural system of traditional practices (the gada system) that is based on defined roles and responsibilities for different stages of life. The Boran seem to have a strong value system that includes a deep connection to and respect for animals and the land, and a lifestyle based mostly on transhumant pastoralism. Before substantial land tenure changes by the Ethiopian government were implemented (Ogbaharya, 2009), Boran pastoralists subsisted on the resources provided by their environment, even in the face of periodic droughts.Boran interviewees reported that, until forty years ago, drought typically recurred every 7-10 years. However, the timing, duration, and severity of drought were relatively predictable, and the effects could be mitigated using available coping strategies. The Boran have traditionally associated cyclical weather patterns and societal shifts with the cycles of their gada political system. At the head of the gada system is the position of abba gada, a political office that transfers between clans every eight years. A gada cycle is comprised of five of these eight-year terms, or 40 years. The Boran associate certain social or environmental characteristics (e.g., high conflict) or events (e.g., floods, disease) with specific clans filling the abba gada position. Study participants reported that the current abba gada (Mr. Guyo Gobba) is from the clan known for filling the abba gada position during the most difficult droughts. However, the recent drought cycle and the current drought are even more severe than was projected by the gada cycle.Traditionally, the Boran have been almost totally dependent for their livelihoods on the products of their cattle, using them as food or in trade for grain. In turn, the cattle depend on the stewardship of the Boran people, as well as the regeneration of grazing lands through frequent and intense seasonal rains. The sustained drought over the year 2011 has caused large herd die-offs in some areas, eliminating the livelihoods of some Boran. The sustained drought, in combination with human and animal population pressures, is a critical contributor the current humanitarian crisis in the Borana region. Although new and/or additional strategies may be needed by the Boran to cope with the region's changing drought-and climate-related risk profile, the roles, strengths and weaknesses of the Boran's traditional coping mechanisms must first be understood.The IGERT research team is composed of five members from the fields of economics, hydrology, livestock, nutrition, public health, and water resources. The team gathered information during a field visit to Ethiopia from July 9 th to July 29 th , 2011. This report summarizes 17 FGDs (focus group discussions) in six rural communities, more than 20 formal interviews with pastoralists, NGOs, development workers, and countless informal discussions. The IGERT team chose to rely primarily on FGDs and key informant interviews in order to collect a wide variety of perspectives, ensure that we would be able to pursue topics that seemed important, and cross-check information. The following section provides a brief description of how the FGD sites and participants were selected and the protocol used when the interviews and discussions were performed. during an exploratory trip to the region.1 Six FGD sites were selected to ensure variety among agro-ecological zones, woredas (administrative districts), and access to infrastructure such as markets and roads (Figure 1). Sites were restricted to those reeras (communities) that contained greater than 50 households and were accessible by 4X4 vehicles (Table 1).In Photo 1.The FGD participant categories were: elders, current pastoralists, and women. Elders were restricted to retired herders older than 60 years. Discussion questions posed in the elders' FGDs focused on, but were not limited to, participants' perceptions of long-term climatic and social trends. The current herders groups were middle-aged heads-of-household who currently perform herding activities. Their discussion questions focused on the impact of current droughts, coping mechanisms, and experiences with outside interventions. The final category was composed of women ages 32-65. Here, participants discussed aspects of climate change and drought that specifically impacted women and children, including perspectives that may not have been revealed in a mixed group. The FGDs typically took between two and three hours. 2FGDs were typically followed by key informant interviews with officers of the local Pastoralist Associations (PA), active community members, and/or DAs. We also performed a number of less formal individual interviews after the FGDs in order to follow up on topics discussed during the FGDs. In addition to the interactions with community members, spending time in the communities provided team members with an opportunity to observe local conditions including geography, access to pasture, water, and infrastructure.Before entering the field, the IGERT team spoke with a number of experts in Addis Ababa.These meetings helped to bring the team up to speed on critical issues that were to be investigated in the field. Information from these interviews was used to focus the FGD discussion outlines on the most important issues. These interviews also provided the team with a better idea of additional research currently taking place, as well as a local perspective of the state of the ongoing drought. Once the field visit to Borana was completed, the team returned to Addis Ababa for follow-up interviews with staff from various NGO and government offices.2 See Appendix B for the research schedule and details.While in the field the team visited the two largest livestock markets in the region and a number of different types of water points. At the markets we were able to speak to sellers and traders and hear their drought stories, where they had come from, and the constraints that they faced. At the water points, we gathered information on how and to whom access was granted.Field notes, digital recordings, and photographs were taken at each site providing anecdotal data that informs much of the discussion contained in the subsequent sections. When possible, information was triangulated among a number of different sources and examined for consistency with existing literature. We have attempted to clearly state when we are expressing the opinion of an interviewee, our interpretation of a situation, or are relying on a general body of knowledge. 3 This report also incorporates a number of comments and suggestions generated when a preliminary copy of this report was made available to researchers with experience in the region and the facilitators who aided us during the FGDs and interviews.3 Most of the general information about the history and livelihoods of the Boran, and climate change in the Borana zone, was acquired through FGDs and interviews with community members. For the sake of readability of this report, sources are sometimes omitted.5 Corresponding months for these seasons cycles are found in Appendix A.It became clear in our interviews that the Boran understand that local weather changes cyclically, in seasonal cycles and then in larger yearly cycles. Boran interviewees seem to possess the following understanding of the seasonal cyclical weather patterns in the Borana zone. A typical year consists of four seasons: (1) a long rainy period, (2) a long dry period, (3) a short rainy period, and (4) a short dry period. Drought conditions occur when lower than average rainfall occurs during one of the seasons. 4 In focus group discussions with elders, a general consensus emerged that droughts are predicted in the coming season utilizing traditional weather forecasting techniques. Some traditional forecasting techniques are inventoried in Appendix C.Weather patterns and herd movement are interrelated in this pastoralist system. The rapidity and distance of livestock migration derives primarily from the availability of grazing land and distance between watering points. Focus group discussions with pastoralists gave the impression that grazing land and distance between watering points impact where pastoralists choose to move herds. Traditionally, one factor that allows herd mobility to be maintained is the availability of large areas of land where herders can choose to graze. In discussions with experts on Boran culture (Personal communication Abebe, 2011;Personal communication Bule, 2011), the assured access to grazing land and water resources of all Boran communities, even those separated by long distances, in times of drought is a traditional way that herd mobility is maintained.In focus group discussions with elders, interviewees noted that significant climatic shifts began occurring about forty years ago. For example, the duration and periodicity of rainfall have changed and are no longer as predictable utilizing traditional weather predicting practices. In all of the six focus group discussions conducted, elders report that drought has become more frequent. Drought strikes predominantly in lowland areas, while flooding frequency has increased in other areas (Personal communication CARE Ethiopia Borana Program, 2011). Interviewees expressed an impression that rainfall is \"patchy\" now, concentrated in certain areas, whereas it used to spread over a larger total land area. The Ethiopian government also began recognizing in the early 1990s that the increasing frequency of drought required a comprehensive national drought plan, now known as the National Policy for Disaster Prevention, Preparedness and Management (Catley et al., 2009). !Traditionally, the Boran have relied on several different strategies to mitigate the effects of recurrent drought. A number of more recent strategies were also observed during the course of this study. We discuss the drought-related risk mitigation strategies, new and old, in the following sections: (1) weather-related;(2) livestock-related;(3) rangeland-related; and (4)water-related.Pastoralists' interpretation and understanding of available climate information is an important component of their decision-making processes (Lybbert et al., 2007). Within pastoral communities, Luseno et al. (2003) described probabilistic forecasts, use of indigenous climate forecasting methods, and awareness and access to external information as three important sources of climate information. Pastoralists in the FGDs seem to value careful planning in response to forecasts as a means of mitigating the impacts of drought. However, the concept of probabilistic forecasts did not appear to be universally understood during the FGDs; for example, sometimes examples of events that contradicted forecasts were brought up as evidence against modern methods.The traditional system of weather prediction includes a variety of techniques: reading livestock intestines; locating and identifying specific species of plants that are in leaf or flower; and interpreting astrological signs (more details can be found in Appendix C). Elders reported that the results of these traditional practices were cross-referenced against the gada calendar's predictions of drought cycles. Traditional practices and the gada cycle were used jointly to predict the likelihood and the severity of drought, allowing the Boran to plan ahead.The elders in FGDs noted, as is also noted in Luseno et al. (2003), that traditional methods recently (as in the past 20 years) seemed to be less predictable. In an interview with some Boran leaders, they noted that the younger generations of Boran were more adept in interpreting external information and that government and NGOs have been attempting to implement more and better warning systems. Interviewees expressed that the information on these warning systems was valuable but sometimes difficult to understand. More information on external information sources and dissemination channels may be found in the \"Enhanced dissemination of information\" section.Cattle comprise the bulk of the diet and the livelihoods of the Boran.Maintaining a sufficiently large herd size will be vital to ensuring sufficient caloric intake among the Boran if animal sources continue to constitute the vast majority of their calories.Although a shift to non-traditional forms of pastoralist livelihoods is occurring, livestock still constitute the most crucial component of Boran livelihoods (Wassie et al., 2007).Although large herds may represent economic and food security, livestock herd size is also correlated with animal well-being and herd mortality. Larger herd sizes can increase herd mortality especially during conditions of drought and stress (Lybbert et al., 2004).Elders reported that due to reduced quality and quantity of rangeland, milk production has decreased. In current drought conditions, the number of lactating animals needed to sustain a household could be as high as 10-20 animals, as compared to forty years ago when one or two lactating animals was sufficient.In pastoralists systems, when herd size falls below a certain threshold, transhumant livelihoods cannot be maintained (Lybbert et al., 2004). The following animal husbandry practices help the Boran maintain sufficiently large herds: (1) herd mobility is maintained to ensure that herds can find pasturelands not decimated by drought;(2) certain traditional communal grazing areas are not utilized for a season to provide extra nourishment for sick, young, and lactating animals in times of scarcity; (3) sick animals are isolated from healthy animals to prevent the spread of disease; and (4) animal injuries and diseases are treated using local knowledge. In addition to these practices, a strong social welfare system (detailed more extensively in Appendix D) has developed to ensure that all Boran can continue to herd livestock. For example, Boran pastoralists reported that households with more than five cattle can be called on to redistribute cattle to those who have sustained severe losses, as part of the social welfare system (called busa gonafa, and detailed in the Traditional Social Insurance section).As nomadic pastoralists, the Boran travel with their livestock in search of water and pasture.Movement is dictated by season and the availability of forage, as well as personal relationships, family structure, and immediate demands. In addition, herd mobility is aided by a network of watering points and wells maintained throughout Borana. Operation and maintenance of these points is controlled through the gada system. Prior to the emergence of recent climate-related changes, migration was limited to mainly wet and dry grazing areas, meaning that different pastures were used during the wet and dry seasons, and that traditional laws governed the use of these resources. As climate change has accelerated, the Boran have altered how they migrate, when, where, and for how long.The Boran now travel significantly greater distances to reach pasture and water, which takes more time and requires men to be away from home for longer periods. Increasing the time demands on herders places financial stress on families who must essentially support two households, and impacts the education of children as some may be removed from school to help at home or to help herd. Traveling greater distances also places extreme caloric demands on cattle and exposes them to disease. Livestock walk farther for food and water, and may expend more energy than they consume. They may also travel from areas that are disease-free to areas where disease is endemic. For example, Dr. Roobaa Basaayyee, the head of Borana Zone Livestock Development and Health Agency, expressed concern that cattle traveling from the south where there are no tse tse flies to the north where the flies are abundant would contract trypanosomiasis, which could result in massive cattle die-offs (Yabello, July 2011).Additionally, there is concern that as the Boran cattle migrate to novel geographic regions there will be increased opportunity for the Boran cattle breed to cross-breed. Depending on which breeds the Boran cattle breed is crossed with, the impacts could include improved or diminished hybrid vigor, disease tolerance, and drought tolerance.Unfortunately, simply changing traditional migration patterns as a means of coping with climate change will not mitigate all of the climate change-related risks. Migration over extremely large distances exacerbates the negative energy balance of the cattle in the region, an imbalance that can be compounded by exposure of naïve populations to novel disease. In the short-term more cattle will survive, but in the long-term more cattle will perish.In the event of massive die-offs of cattle, the Boran rely on a traditional three-tiered insurance system. The first tier is busa gonafa, a community-based re-stocking program in which several Boran families, whose cattle have survived, give a cow to a Boran family that has lost their entire herd. The cow is a permanent gift and is intended to help the family begin to rebuild their herd. The second is ames, a short-term loan extended from one Boran family to another in the form of a lactating cow. The Boran family that receives the lactating cow may keep the cow and use her milk for one lactation cycle (typically less than six months in Borana) and then must return the cow. The third tier is rebaray, a charitable donation in which a single Boran family gives a cow to another Boran family following the complete loss of their herd. The cow is a gift, and the family that receives the cow has full rights to the cow, her milk, and her offspring. In order for this system to work and be perpetuated, the families that are donating and lending cattle must have a minimum of five cows. Families that do not meet this minimum requirement are not asked to make donations. In the face of climate change, this traditional system is failing primarily because families cannot meet the minimum required livestock holdings in order to participate in the system.In the past, the provision of feed to cattle by women (cut and carry) within the Boran system was only extended to the young and the debilitated. Women would cut and collect grass and bring the feed to the animals housed at the homestead. This served two important animal health functions: (1) it minimized the spread of infectious disease by limiting the movement of sick cattle, and (2) it facilitated growth and healing by reducing the caloric expenditure associated with grazing activity. This system has now become a coping mechanism. In anticipation of drought, farmers collect and store hay in open protected structures, an activity never previously undertaken among the Boran. Farmers who can afford to do so purchase feed for one to two individual animals in hopes that if they can supplement the diet of a few individuals, they can avoid complete herd loss.These activities require more inputs from the women in the household to collect the hay, and place more financial strain on households as they must re-direct income for the household to maintenance of the herd. This coping mechanism requires extensive planning and knowledge of impending climate conditions so that hay may be cut when it is abundant, which occurs less often now that drought conditions are becoming more frequent and severe. The purchasing of feed is not a feasible coping mechanism for the vast majority of the Boran, who simply do not have the disposable income to support this practice.As the landscape in southern Ethiopia has become drier, the presence of drought-tolerant livestock has increased. Currently, proportions of different types of cattle in Boran herds are being reduced relative to goats and camels, which are more drought tolerant and disease resistant. Livestock diversification has become one of the most universally adopted coping mechanisms in Borana. Nearly all Boran have multispecies herds that include goats, with increasing numbers of herds adding camels. While this strategy has been widely successful, constraints exist. First, Boran interviewees expressed concern over their lack of knowledge about the husbandry and management of camels. They are unfamiliar with camelid diseases, and lack knowledge of both traditional and non-traditional treatments. In focus group discussions conducted with Boran pastoralists, interviewees stated that the care and housing of these animals was novel to them, and that they were unsure of how to manage animals in order to prevent (not simply to treat) disease.Secondly, camels are expensive relative to cattle. They can cost nearly six times more than a healthy cow. Furthermore, most camels cannot be sold before three years, but preferably six years, of age. It is therefore a relatively large financial investment and the return on the investment cannot be realized rapidly. While the Boran will drink camel milk, the amount of milk produced by a camel is significantly less than that produced by a cow. Therefore, ownership of camels does not contribute as greatly to the direct subsistence of the farmers.Lastly, ownership of camels in place of cattle is in direct conflict with Boran culture. ManyBoran in focus group discussions spoke passionately about their relationship and history with cattle. To paraphrase one group of pastoralists in Dhas (August, 2011), Boran culture is defined by cattle ownership and husbandry, and without cattle the Boran feel they can no longer call themselves \"Boran\". Among the Boran, livestock diversification is even sometimes perceived as a threat to Boran identity.Direct subsistence on cattle and their products is waning in Borana as a result of climate change. Fertility of cows may be compromised due to a poor plane of nutrition, and those who do become pregnant and give birth to live offspring have shortened lactation cycles which produce lower volumes of milk. Consequently, there is simply not enough milk available to sustain the calf and the people. As drought conditions worsen, lack of calories and lack of water results in a continued decrease in milk production. Animals approaching starvation are being sold in the market. Previously, selling animals was a rare event, as a large herd is a sign of prestige and is culturally valuable among the Boran.The Boran appear to be reducing their herd size as a coping mechanism for several reasons.First, it minimizes risk and allows the Boran greater financial gain than would be possible if the animal were to die. Secondly, income from the sale of livestock can be used to buy household goods or other urgent needs. While this offers immediate relief, it is problematic with respect to the market. The Boran are selling their livestock when the market is flooded and prices are low. When asked about this practice, the focus group participants at all interview sites anticipated having to sell some cattle during the dry season, but indicated a preference for trying to maintain large herds as long as possible through the dry season.Reasons for this are unclear, but might be attributable to cultural prestige associated with having a large herd and risk-reducing behaviors. The perception seemed to be that a larger, less healthy herd had better odds of having some members survive, whereas a smaller, healthier herd risked losing all members. The alternative would be to sell cattle after the rains when the market price was high, and voluntarily reduce herd size, but this behavior was not reported. Therefore, the selling of livestock appears to be an emergent coping mechanism designed to buffer against extreme shocks within an already unstable system.Animal health is one of the Boran system's greatest strengths. Local knowledge of cattle husbandry and health is substantial, and appears to be very accurate and well applied. The government vaccination program is well organized and executed, especially in light of resource constraints in the region. When asked about the health of their cattle and death due to disease, all of the focus groups consistently reported that deaths due to disease had been significantly reduced in the last 40 years, and all expressed satisfaction with the government vaccination program.When asked about strategies to improve the health of their herds and increase drought tolerance, no mechanisms were volunteered. However, when asked about the impact of castration on animal health, all focus groups reported that they believed castration improved animal health, weight gain, and drought tolerance. Nevertheless, castration has not been adopted as a coping mechanism. When asked why so few animals were castrated, the explanation provided by several focus groups was that there was no longer a market for the meat of castrated animals, and that they did not fetch the same price as an intact animal at market. Some Boran reported that 10 to 15 years ago, a very strong market for castrated animals existed in northern Kenya, but that it no longer existed. No one was able to speak to what caused the change but speculated that the change was driven by a large and increasing demand in the Middle East for reproductively intact animals, which provided a desirable marbling of fat and muscle. All Boran interviewees stated that they would be willing to castrate their animals if they believed they could sell them in the market, and some elaborated on traditional methods used in the past for castration, and identified castration services available through the local government veterinary office.Coping mechanisms being adopted by the Boran to maintain their livestock herds are generally not perceived to be sufficient or sustainable by the Boran, in part because frustration abounds over how these mechanisms are impacting Boran culture, (e.g., through altered migration patterns, consumption of camel milk instead of cow milk, and reduced herd size), and because fear over the financial hardships associated with these practices exists. In order to keep cattle alive, men are away from home for longer, which is an added expense for little return. The market cannot support the large influx of cattle during drought periods, and the amount of income generated by the sale of a cow does not match the investment made to keep the cow alive. While the animal health system is generally very strong, and the animals that come to market are relatively healthy from a disease perspective, this could potentially change as animals migrate to new regions and become exposed to new diseases, or carry in new disease to naïve regions. The Boran consistently express an interest in and desire for having better climate information, but how this information would be utilized for the management of livestock is unclear, especially with respect to the decision to de-stock and sell animals in the market.The primary means by which pastoralists, like communities everywhere, will feel the impacts of climate change is in changes in land and water resources. The Boran have been living with scarce pastureland and water for generations. A number of rangeland-related risk-mitigation measures have been undertaken by Boran communities, as well as initiated by the government and NGOs. Many of these measures have been in use for at least decades, and were developed in response to local climatic fluctuations without specifically being in response to recent climate change. However, these measures may still be relevant in conjunction with other, more \"modern\", methods as responses to climate change, and are mentioned here.The Boran have sophisticated traditional systems of managing land and water resources.Regions are designated as wet season grazing areas and dry season grazing areas. The dry season grazing areas tend to be areas of relatively lower elevation where water accumulates, thereby allowing pasture growth even in the absence of significant rainfall. From several interviews, the IGERT team learned that this system has reportedly come under increasing pressure. The pressure is possibly due to growth of cultivation (see below) and population (human and livestock) increase, among other factors such as conflict, political boundaries, and private enclosures. Rangeland degradation may be both cause and effect of the disruption in the traditional systems. Focus group discussion participants mentioned attempts to revitalize this system, with some initiative on the part of the local government. This system may be especially useful if droughts become more frequent and/or severe since it allows Boran communities to together reserve a part of pasture for drier times of the year. While this system alone is not adequate, having some pasture reserved for the dry season might allow the communities some additional time to plan responses in a bad year.Kallos are enclosures which are reserved for lactating, sick or young animals, so that these animals do not have to travel the much larger distances traveled by the rest of the herd for pasture particularly in the dry season. Though the traditional enclosures for calves were smaller and called seera yabbiye, or \"calf reserve\" (Helland, 1994), kallos, which are an \"imported\" strategy have become very common. The kallos, which may be for the use of the whole village or a group of households, are built by clearing a patch of land of bushes, and are often fenced by dried bush. Kallos range in size from one to tens of hectares (Solomon et al., 2007), and account for almost a tenth of the total land area surrounding communities (McCarthy et al., 2003). Communities often build kallos under government and NGO initiatives. In times of drought, kallos may mitigate to an extent the distances that weaker animals have to travel for pasture, and like wet/dry grazing areas may provide at least temporary relief.Bush encroachment will likely interfere with the ability of the Boran to adapt to increased climatic pressures as it effectively reduces the pastureland available. Moreover, areas which have been encroached by bush have little grass seed left in the soil, making reestablishment of grass very difficult. Thus, although bush clearing programs such as controlled burning do not occur strictly in response to climate change, they are relevant to climate change adaptation.Some FGD participants mentioned bush burning as having other beneficial effects such as promoting growth of preferred grass species. Though the government ban on bush-burning was brought up as an issue in many discussions, many interviewees asserted that rather than an absolute ban on bush-burning, a regulation passed against burning forests during the Derg regime was widely interpreted by local authorities to mean that burning for bush clearing was also banned. Bush encroachment has increased steadily, though not necessarily related solely to the stoppage of burning. Solomon et al. (2007) report that the species of bush (Acacia brevispica and Euclea shrimperi) identified by community elders to be problematic are different from the species reported in previous studies. Bush clearing is very difficult due to the tendency of these species to grow back, as well as their long thorny branches. Government agencies and NGOs promote communities to undertake bush clearing through cutting. There have been some studies on burning as a method for controlling the bush, but burning is currently not as prevalent as cutting. A lack of grass to spread the fire between bushes was also raised as a reason for burning not being practiced. However in some areas visited by the IGERT team, the bush appeared dense. As bush encroachment reduces useful pasture, which is a scarce resource in times of drought, bush clearing can be an effective strategy to bolster other adaptation measures. Improvements in efficiency and effectiveness of bush clearing methods are however needed urgently for this approach to be feasible.There are a number of change adaptation measure is also dependent whether or not it impedes rangeland-related practices, such as wet/dry grazing areas, that may more directly help in adaptation.Cultivation of crops has reportedly increased in Borana. In the last four decades, there has been a change among the Boran from almost no households involved in cultivation to a large majority of households involved in some form of cultivation, usually of maize and/or beans (Desta, 2011). In 1997, only about 18% of Boran cropped (from a personal interview with Dr.Desta; see also Coppock, 1994;Desta, 1999;Desta and Coppock, 2004). Desta (2011) reports that in a survey of 140 Boran households, 93% engaged in cultivation. This transition was encouraged at least in part by government policy promoting agriculture particularly among pastoralists who had lost livestock (Desta, 2006). Crops are grown in dry season grazing areas, as these areas retain water for a longer period of time. Households now petition to the elders of the community for the right to fence in an area for cropping. If that right is granted, they must then go to the PA and pay a tax on the land that they wish to crop. The household then has the right to fence the field and crop there. In many cases, households apply for and fence in larger plots than they crop with the intention of maintaining a small private pasture.The result is a first-come, first-served tenure system that is transforming the most fertile and well-watered communal pastures into private cropland. This is a contributing factor in the disruption of the traditional movement between seasonal grazing areas, and has contributed to conflict over land and water resources (Yirbecho, 2004). Many pastoralists mentioned trying to grow crops but doing so without much expectation of success as the chances of crop success were highly dependent on rainfall. In FGDs, participants mentioned irrigated cultivation as being a potential strategy to cope with climate change if water became available. Although cultivation has been adopted as a risk mitigation effort, the way it is currently being practiced in Borana does not seem to bring much benefit to the majority of the Boran both due to potential competition between crop-cultivation and dry-season grazing areas as well as due to meager chances of success for the cultivator. The potential for irrigated cultivation seems very limited at best due to the region's dry climate and recurrent droughts.Crop cultivation is therefore unlikely to be a sustainable adaptation strategy in Borana. There are also some conflicts arising because of this issue between the Borana and other communities who practice farming, for example the Konso (further detailed in \"Emerging Climate Change Adaptation Strategies\").Though not in practice yet, some interviewees mentioned the possibility of the government cultivating or encouraging cultivation of forage crops and/or crops for livestock feed using irrigation. This is being envisaged as a potential benefit of the Water Network (see below).Few details appear to be available at this stage on these plans. Though this might seem encouraging as a means of adapting to times of pasture-scarcity, it is unclear if adequate consideration has been given to the sustainability of irrigated cultivation in light of the limited water availability and frequent droughts, as well as on practices such as wet/dry grazing areas.Some parts of Borana (Arero and Yabello) and nearby areas (e.g., Negele in the Guji zone)have forests of Juniperus procera (Tache and Irwin, 2003). Though relatively small in area (exact numbers proved hard to find), they provide important services to the communities who live close to them. These services include environmental services such as erosion control and water retention, forest products such as wood and resins that may be processed for various uses, grazing areas, and sources of water. SOS Sahel Ethiopia is an NGO that works to promote community involvement in the management of forests. For the communities close to these forests, the services provided by forests provide risk-mitigation opportunities and sustainable forest management may be developed as part of an adaptation strategy. For example, processed forest products may form livelihood diversification opportunities, or at least fall-back options for times of difficulty, particularly for women.Traditional rules of governance appear to be well known among the Boran. Penalties for violation of established rules, often set by a council of elders, have tended to be heavy. For example, in one of our FGDs it was mentioned that if a herder were to graze on common land that has been set aside for other purposes, he would have to pay a penalty of up to five heads of cattle. However, a number of times during our interviews and discussions the weakening of traditional institutions was mentioned, and as the management of rangeland is rooted in traditional institutions, this may have, in combination with other factors, affected the ability of the Boran to collectively adapt rangeland management to a changing climate. Some of the strategies above, apart from directly contributing to risk mitigation, may also be developed into opportunities for employment and therefore livelihood diversification.The Borana have long been adapted to a landscape with little water. However with more frequent droughts, water availability has declined. Water management is therefore an important part of adapting to climate change. A number of strategies at various scales have been initiated by Boran communities as well as the government and NGOs to deal with the issue of water availability.Water management is deeply which the abba ela belongs. However, in general, any Boran may make a case to the community for permission to use the well. In addition to the deep wells, there are additionally many shallow wells, called Adadils, also exist, and function for shorter periods of time. Many of these wells are still in use, and several which are damaged are being \"rehabilitated\" by NGOs or the government. Helland (1980) provides an extremely interesting discussion on these traditional water sources. These traditional water sources, particularly the tulas, are notable for having served the Boran for the duration of their existence in this region. They may therefore remain important in promoting sustainable water use while providing much needed water during times of drought.There are several large water projects present in the Borana, some of which go back several decades. For example, a water storage reservoir can be found near the Haro Bake livestock market. Many of these, however, have been reported to have problems such as siltation (interview with Dawit Abebe). Moreover, in many of these storage reservoirs, including the one we observed, livestock actually enter into the water. Since humans also use these reservoirs, this presents a danger in terms of zoonotic, particularly intestinal, diseases. In some FGDs, participants expressed the view that the overcrowding of livestock around some of these water points has disrupted the traditional seasonal grazing cycles and has caused degradation of the surrounding pastureland. While these may have been intended to provide water particularly in times of drought and many of them do serve this purpose, it appears that their utility has been hampered by these problems.In many areas, communities Haro Bake market may be used to bring the water. There seemed in general to be little local expertise in repairing mechanical faults, and a consequent dependence on governments or NGOs to ensure functioning, sometimes making water availability difficult at times for communities even when a well was accessible. When wells do function, smaller wells and ponds seem to be relatively more useful and easily accessible sources of water. Although wells appear to be a useful form of risk mitigation, it is difficult to anticipate whether and how frequent droughts might affect their effectiveness, either through potential decreases in recharge or through increased demand.Particularly in emergencies, the government and NGOs send water trucks to villages. Storage of trucked water tends to be in cisterns, which are often located at schools or other community structures. The quantity of water that can be sent in this way is limited due to infrastructure but also because of limited storage facilities in each village. Moreover, as water cannot be trucked very far, particularly under poor road conditions, the utility of this approach is limited if the entire region suffers drought. Water trucking is therefore at best an emergency measure for short durations. Better roads would facilitate the timely provision of water in periods of acute shortage.The Water Network is a 1500-2000 kilometer pipe network project that could change the Borana region a great deal. It is intended to supply water to much of the region, including villages and towns. The water is drawn from groundwater wells in the Borana region and is expected to reach almost 900,000 people (i.e., around 90% of the population) (FDRE Population Census Commission, 2007) and two million livestock by the time it is complete.However, the timeline of the project is unclear, and there have been issues of materials costs.In general the communities we spoke to seemed optimistic about the project, noting that if they received piped water, women and children would not have to spend as much time and effort collecting it. Many also expressed the desire to use the water to irrigate crops. However, it is unclear if the Network would be able to sustainably support a growing human and livestock population in addition to potential migration from other regions, particularly given limited water availability and recurrent droughts.The IGERT team is unaware of forecasts of water demand and availability under various scenarios such as those mentioned above. Yet without such assessments, ensuring the sustainable use of water resources in general and groundwater in particular, whether with large or small projects, may be very difficult. It is also unlikely that irrigated cultivation would be sustainable in the region. In areas with such large water quantity issues, water quality is often a secondary consideration. Though some testing is done by the government on The difference in livelihood roles seems to create a difference in spaces occupied by men and women. Men often will leave the homestead during a season to find rangeland for livestock.Women are left to tend the home. As a result, sometimes roles such as intra-village commerce may be more predominantly occupied by women. However, these apparent dichotomies in gender roles or space are not as clear-cut and distinct at first glance. Women do engage in tending to livestock because a large part of the traditional Boran diet is derived from livestock products. In addition, women reported that a major activity was gathering grass feed for livestock, in particular to feed lactating animals or calves that can be left behind when men leave the homestead. Men engage in business and commerce and, from our perception, the vast majority of administrative and civic leadership roles are occupied by men.The increased persistence and frequency of drought perceived by pastoralists in this region has direct and unique impacts on women because of their roles in society. Boran women engage in a range of activities distinct from those of men to cope with the loss of livestock and limited access to food and water. In order to understand the ways in which Boran women cope with drought, the IGERT team conducted six FGDs composed entirely of women ages 30-70, all of whom were mothers. Additionally, the team spoke with NGOs, local experts, and key informants, such as local women's group leaders and health extension workers. Further information on methods may be found in the Methods section of this report.When men leave the homestead, women have a responsibility to find ways to generate income for the family. In many communities, women's groups or savings cooperatives have been established to provide financial support to women hoping to engage in petty trade businesses.The cooperatives are often set up by NGOs such as CARE, Gayo, or SOS Sahel; however, in some communities, the groups are initiated by the women themselves. The cooperatives differ in their operating schemes, however in general, women put money into the cooperative during the rainy season when they are able to sell livestock, butter, and milk and borrow from the cooperative during the dry season to engage in business or to purchase food for their families.Cooperatives may also work together to buy and sell maize and sugar to make a profit, which is then available for women to borrow.If women are financially able, they often engage in petty trade during times of drought. These activities are encouraged by NGOs, such as CARE, but are more often initiated by women themselves. In general, petty trade involves the woman traveling to town to purchase sugar, alcohol, coffee, tobacco, and tea leaves and then returning to the village to sell these items, thus earning a small profit. In some cases, women may also purchase grain in the highlands and sell it in the lowlands to earn income, which, according to Charles Hopkins of CARE Ethiopia, may serve as one mechanism to stabilize grain prices during drought. Children may also engage in petty trade, either traveling to town with their mothers or going alone to buy sweets or sugar to sell in the village. In some cases where villages are very far from town (sometimes up to six days walking) women may form groups to raise enough money to rent a donkey or a camel that can be used for a trip to town, where items will be collected, returned to the village and sold. Depending on their distance from town, some women and children shift entirely to the town in order to engage in petty trade. Children living in town may fetch water, do housework for wealthier families, or look after other families' livestock in exchange for a wage.Women who live in close proximity to forests or wooded areas may use products from the forest to supplement their incomes. Organizations such as SOS Sahel encourage forest management and teach women how to use products from the forest to generate profit. Women can produce a scented wood product that is used as a perfume. They may also collect gum from trees or produce and sell incense. Trees can also be harvested from the bush and sold for use as perfumed wood.Women have begun to keep goats, considered to be a more drought-resistant livestock compared to cattle, in order to survive during times of drought. Women can use the goats to supply milk for their children. They can also sell livestock in the market to pay for school fees for their children or to purchase maize, other grains, salt, oil, tea, and sugar at the market in town for consumption in the home.Overall, women seem to survive by supporting each other. For example, women may donate milk to each other within a village for consumption or sold in the market to buy maize for home consumption. Moreover, women and children who do not have livestock may borrow food from their neighbors who still have livestock. Additionally, women support each other through the savings and credit cooperatives where they deposit small sums of money, borrow when they need to, and then return the money when they are able.Alongside income-generating activities, women also engage in activities to maintain the health and nutrition of their children. In Boran culture, children, especially those under five, are given priority access to food. During times of food scarcity, such as prolonged drought, food is distributed to the youngest child first, then older children, followed by the husband, and lastly the wife. During times of food scarcity, adults will often reduce the number of meals they eat from three per day to two per day. Moreover, because women must travel further to reach water sources during drought, they have less time available for meals and are forced to reduce the amount they eat during the day.Women in the Borana region are typically in charge of food within a household. During drought periods, consumption may shift from preferred foods to less-preferred foods. For example, women substitute camel milk for cow milk even though women tend to prefer cow milk because it tastes better and can be used to make butter. Often, during drought, there is no animal milk so women must alter the foods they feed to their children. In those cases, children are fed boiled sugar water, strong tea, or maize powder in place of milk. In addition, women collect roots and wild fruits from the bush; however these products tend to be difficult and time-consuming to prepare.Many people in the Borana region are food-insecure due to the recent pattern of droughts. As a result, food aid is common in the region. Women depend on food aid and supplementary food to survive. This food is distributed by the government and is donated through the World Food Program. Distributed food often includes maize, vegetable oil, and cowpeas. As reported by FGD participants, some communities receive no food aid, while others receive aid every three or six months. According to the manager of the Productive Safety Nets Program (PSNP) at Save the Children-US, various government and non-governmental organizations take responsibility for food distribution in different areas and at different times. Therefore it seems that these differences in food aid distribution may reflect local needs assessments and/or the responsible donor-agency.Public works programs are common and many women participate in these schemes. Projects range from bush clearing, to digging ponds, or fencing in pasture or grazing areas. Both the government and NGOs, such as Gayo, Mercy Corps, and Save the Children, encourage women to participate in projects in order to preserve the local natural resources. In exchange for work, women receive cash and/or food.Lastly, education is utilized as a type of \"insurance\" by women. NGOs such as CARE recognize that the potential skills accrued by education for pastoralist girls could lead to alternative forms of income generation. All women who participated in the FGD discussions recognize the importance of school and most send at least one child to school. Some communities have built schools using juniper trees from protected forests. If there is no local school, children are sent to live in the town so they may attend school. Sending children to live in town requires that living space is rented and represents a financial burden for poor families. In some cases, such a financial burden limits opportunities for less well off families who are unable to afford to rent places in town for their children. In spite of the financial hardship, women interviewed in focus groups believe that educated children will be able to find jobs and support the family if the livestock die. Women in these groups also realize that educated children tend to find jobs elsewhere and often do not return to the land.Recurrent droughts place additional and unique burdens and stresses on women. When asked to rank the problems of most importance to women, the resounding majority of women chose water scarcity as the biggest challenge. One prominent coping strategy by women in focus groups was to cultivate crops alongside traditional pastoralist life. The recent lack of rain has decreased or eliminated the option of farming for those involved in cultivation as an incomediversification strategy. Additionally, lack of water decreases the volume of milk that animals produce, thereby reducing the amount of food available for families. As drought becomes recurrent, small and locally available water sources tend to dry up first forcing women to travel farther to fetch water each day. There is a notable relationship that as distance from water source increase for a family, illness risk increases (Wang and Hunter, 2010). In focus group discussions, women stated that women, young, old, and pregnant, now walk for up to six hours in each direction to collect water and return home carrying 20 kilograms or more on their backs. The extra time needed to fetch water during drought displaces time spent on other women-centered activities, such as caring for children, preparing food, or engaging in business.The second most pressing problem facing women in the region is the scarcity of food. During the current drought, during our field visit in July of 2011, most women have struggled to feed their families. Many women noted that this struggle to provide food, especially to children, causes great psychological stress because it is more difficult to accomplish. As a result of cultural practices, women are served food last which seems to place a disproportionate burden on women in times of food scarcity. During times of food shortage, women may go an entire day without food because the limited resources were given to the children and men first. Food shortages are especially difficult for pregnant women as they are given no special food privileges despite their condition. One woman noted that 11 women have miscarried in her village in the past six months.Moreover, women are concerned about access to health care. The distance to health facilities is perceived to be a long distance from some communities that were interviewed and the women noted that many times ill individuals will avoid traveling to a health post until the condition is severe. In these cases, it is common for a severely ill person to die before reaching the health post. The distance to health posts also makes it difficult for women to receive antenatal services or to obtain medicines for themselves or their children.Other problems facing women include lack of pasture and health facilities for livestock. Due to the current drought there is severe food shortage for animals. To cope with this food shortage for animals, women fetch grass for calves. In focus group discussions, women reported that they walk long distances or climb mountains and trees to find suitable food for calves.In response to the problems women mentioned, they had several solutions to mitigate these problems. Women had many ideas on how to improve access to water during drought. They suggested interventions such as: digging boreholes closer to the villages, building ponds near the villages, providing villages with water tanks or cisterns, and building more traditional wells. Some women even suggested that constructing ponds for women only would ease their labor burden in providing water to the household. Additionally, women suggested improvements in infrastructure, such as: bringing in piped water from Yabello or building roads to increase water access.There were problems reported in response to lack of human and livestock food. The most common solution mentioned by women in response to human food shortage was increasing food aid. Women are particularly interested in receiving supplemental food for children since most of the food distributions include only maize, dried peas, and vegetable oil. When probed about alternate solutions to food aid, women suggested aid in the form of cash, which they could use to buy supplemental food or to begin small businesses. There were limited ideas among the women about how to mitigate the problems of lack of livestock food. Women suggested that food aid for livestock, particularly during the dry season would help to preserve herd size and health, and decrease the burden of labor placed on women to find food for livestock during drought.While, in all communities, women noted that there was support for health problems on the group in terms of health extension workers, women recommended constructing additional health posts in the villages and staffing them with health extension workers. Moreover, many health extension workers were male and women reported that this made it more difficult for women to talk about women's health related issues.Some communities have participated in food-/cash-for-work programs, however the women noted that these programs are generally only for the poorest members of the community.Other communities have women's savings and credit cooperatives. In particular, one women's group mentioned that Gayo had plans to start a women's credit cooperative in their village.When discussing types of aid, women unanimously agreed that they would prefer to receive food rather than cash due to the following reasons: grain can be consumed and fed to children, money can be used in ways that does not benefit the household, and distances to markets are long making it difficult to purchase food.Communication services in the region are lacking. None of the women in any of the six focus groups owned a mobile phone. However, all of the women agreed that they would like to have mobile phones. Women listed numerous ways in which they would use mobile phones, including: communicating with family, contacting men during herd migration, and requesting assistance from the government when problems arise.As noted previously, the Ethiopian government has plans to build a Water Network in the Boran region. Some women had heard of this water project while others had not. All the groups had positive opinions of the water network and a positive concept of personally having access to piped water. Women believe that the water network will be particularly beneficial to women: it will save them time and provide them with a source of reliable, clean water. There was also a perception of several focus group discussions with women that when the water network came, such water could be used for cultivation.Finally, it is important to note that not all women believe that the pastoralism is sustainable.Some of the women believe they could have better lives by leaving pastoralism and starting businesses. Others simply hope that their children will leave the traditional pastoralist livelihoods, become educated, get good jobs, and support them.As seasons shift, access to quality pastures decreases, usefulness and applicability of technologies change, and opportunities vary. Households respond by adapting the strategies that they use to construct their livelihoods. Often adaptation takes place in the form of small changes in current activities, such as buying a little extra sugar at market to sell in the community or cutting grass for fodder a little more often than before, but some changes are expressed in larger investments in time and money, requiring a major redirection of resources.!\"#$following section inventories those adaptations that either seemed most important to the interviewees and FGD participants or seemed most promising in the eyes of the authors. In many cases, these strategies are practiced (to varying degrees) by most households, although a few of the strategies were often mentioned but rarely practiced.As households cope with changing climate and social structures, many of them are choosing to increase the diversity of their livelihood strategies (also listed in Appendix E).Diversification reduces the proportion of total investment and relative exposure to risk associated with a single activity while opening up new opportunities for generating welfare.Most diversifying strategies discussed in this section are extensions of the coping strategies mentioned above, but in this context are meant to emphasize a more permanent shift in the activities on which the household relies. The following section brings together those various diversification activities in order to examine them more thoroughly. The first part focuses on changes taking place within pastoralism. The second part focuses on strategies beyond pastoralist activities. The respondents' perceptions of those activities and prevalence of integration are included where available.One additional point should be mentioned here. The Ethiopian government has recently conducted a Good Governance class at the kebele level though its system of DAs. In those classes the participants were encouraged to: (1) keep money in banks, (2) diversify livelihoods into small business, and (3) build houses in urban areas to rent out or buy a truck to transport goods. Although these three strategies were mention in nearly every FGD, to the knowledge of the authors, none of the participants had actively pursued any of them.Diversification into different species of livestock allows the household to maintain animals that feed on different species of plants, increasing their options for extracting resources from the rangeland. Camels and goats are thought to be more drought tolerant than cattle. Camels and goats are browsers which enables them to take advantage of the increased availability of shrubs and trees caused by bush encroachment. Most of the households among the focus group participants already include goats in their holdings, and camels are becoming increasingly popular. Camels are able to fetch high prices in a market that exports them to the Middle East. The two largest barriers into camel herding for respondents were the initial price of a calf and lack of experience with camel care. The negative social stigma that the Boran once attached to camel and goat ownership seems to have been eroded as these animals prove that they are able to weather droughts more successfully than cattle.The increased use of private kallos and ranches, purchasing supplementary feed, and collecting hay from marginal or buffer areas are strategies that reduce dependence on mobility between wet and dry season pastures. Although all of the pastoralists continue to practice transhumant livelihoods, many are increasing their use of other methods for securing the feed their livestock need. At the time of this research, some households were not maintaining herds at satellite camps, either because those satellite herds had died in the drought or the herders felt that there was little opportunity to find better pastures elsewhere. Instead, those herders depended on their ability to secure feed at the base camp. Although this strategy is a direct consequence of the current drought, the perception that population pressures had reduced the benefits of mobility was widespread.there is rain then you get food from the harvest. If there is little rain, the livestock can still eat whatever comes up even if there is no harvest\" (Elder FDG participant, Siqu, July 17 2011).Many of the women and men mentioned that diversification into petty trade was a popular diversification strategy. Households can offset the fixed costs of traveling to market and take advantage of price differentials between the communities and market towns to generate income by selling community produced goods at market (e.g., forest and livestock products)or reselling manufactured or value-added products (e.g., grains and tea) back in the communities. Theoretically, there is the added advantage that increased petty trade may increase access to outside goods and stabilize prices in the communities. There are also a number of organizations and traders, such as the Gum Arabic Association, that facilitate trade by establishing pickup points in the communities or by helping community members to organize sellers' cooperatives. For example, SOS Sahel has helped a number of women create a cooperatively run soap and lotion business. From the observations of the IGERT team, it appears that women and children are more likely than men to diversify into petty trade, although men mentioned beekeeping and charcoal-making as possible activities.As part of the Ethiopian government's development program, Boran households are able to lease a lot of land in Yabelo (the regional capital) for a highly subsidized price. The DA's Good Governance classes encourage leasing urban lots as a means for investing in capital whose value does not co-vary with the climate. Community members reported that they could build houses on the lots to generate income through rental agreements. Although respondents cited this activity, the IGERT team was unable to collect evidence that any of the focus group participants had actually tried it. There was a great deal of house and hotel construction in Yabello, but little of it was being done for or by local community members. None of the FGD participants leased land in a regional town.Similar to investment in real estate, a number of individuals mentioned purchasing a truck to open small transportation enterprises. There was little evidence that any of the FGD participants had successfully followed this path in the past, or that they were actively working towards pursuing this strategy.Currently, households do not depend heavily on off-farm employment or remittances (Desta and Coppock, 2004) but many of the participants in this research expressed the desire to find employment. From their perspective, education is key for their children because it provides them with the opportunity to find off-farm employment. Yet many of the boutique, hotel, and restaurant staff in the region were immigrants from other regions of the country, not Boran.As households continue to experiment with new combinations of activities, their success will depend, in part, on the response of the Boran society, the Ethiopian government, and NGOs.Households require the support of their communities and institutions so that they can adapt together to the changes taking place around them. The next section outlines a number of areas in which there are opportunities to support changes that require community organization or institutional adjustments.Boran on government land. The center has excellent knowledge of husbandry, as well as of regional impediments to cattle health. Furthermore, the center identifies outstanding farmers annually in different woredas and sells breeding stock to those farmers in order to perpetuate the breed and to introduce genetic diversity. The center could be utilized for extension and training in order to preserve the Boran breed, and to facilitate farmers in maintaining optimal cattle health in order to enable cattle to survive periods of drought.As mentioned in the Livestock section, it is reported by the Boran that castration of bulls increases their drought resistance and reduces their calorie requirements. This observation does not appear to be substantiated in the literature, and the authors are not aware of any formal studies that have been conducted describing the impact of castration on the Boran cattle breed, and suspect that no formal studies exist. However, for other breeds of cattle, the impact of castration has been described. While lean, intact males produce a higher carcass yield grade they usually produce a lower quality grade. In general, steers (castrated bulls) tend to have more desirable composition of external fat and marbling, but this is offset by their tendency toward decreased rate of weight gain and a lower feed conversion efficiency (Schanbacher, 1984 andSeidemen et al., 1982). Given that the Boran breed is a unique breed of cattle that differs significantly in conformation, as well as disease resistance, when compared to other Bos taurus or Bos indicus breeds, it is not clear whether these published findings can be extrapolated to the Boran population of cattle. Further research in this area is warranted, and is being addresses at the Boran Cattle Breeding Center in Yabello.Currently households do not practice castration because young bulls are used as a liquid asset and sold in the market, where bulls receive about double the price of steers per kg when both animals are in good condition. 5 The few male cattle that each household maintains are used to impregnate cows and are thus kept uncastrated. also facilitate the adoption of land-use initiatives that require community-wide acceptance and participation. The following are four land-use initiatives that seemed to hold promise but require a great degree of organization and management from the communities that they would impact.Although uncommon, a community-wide destocking plan, a means of reducing grazing pressure, was reported in one community. Possibly, if multiple neighboring communities all agreed to destock large-scale benefits could be realized.Community pasture preserves reduce grazing pressures within the pasture and increase the incentives to manage the land sustainably. In a fee-for-use arrangement, the ranch can redirect resources towards maintaining and improving pasture quality. Implementation should include measures to protect against favoring the wealthier, increased grazing pressures outside of the preserve, and the creation of new poverty thresholds.In some areas of high conflict, no grazing or cutting areas known as buffer zones have been established between communities with the help of NGO mediators and government support.This strategy of delineating property rights has met with some success in reducing violent incidents. In addition to reducing violent conflicts, buffer areas between conflict zones also act as a pasture of last resort. During droughts when access to pasture is critical, there seems to be a relaxing of the exclusion rules for the buffer areas between the conflicting communities. According to herders in Wachile, Mercy Crops helped them to establish a buffer area between their region and the Somali region. Currently the drought has driven most of the households and their cattle away from the buffer areas. Those that remain near them feel that they can cut forage for their cattle from the buffer areas without fear of conflict because there are fewer people and livestock in the area competing for resources. Also, according to a key 54 There are many potential benefits to increasing access to information. The IGERT team was able to observe and discuss those benefits with individuals from communities with widely varying levels of information access. If increased, four general types of information seem to have the greatest potential to improve the livelihoods of community members.As climate trends diverge from those anticipated by traditional climate forecasting, participants expressed a desire for alternate climate information sources. Although many felt there were other options for attaining forecast information, they were not well understood or perceived to be sufficient. The available options mentioned were radio reports, reports accessed by phone, government extension agents, and their own children. Notably, the participants said that educated young people understood the new sources and formats of climate information much better than the older generation did. The ability to use and understand new sources of climate information was mentioned as one of the benefits of education. Participants reported that in many cases it was younger people who had first understood how severe the current drought would be, because of their greater access to information. They had encouraged their families to take action early on by selling animals and diversifying their livelihoods. Government agents also facilitate the delivery of forecast information to the communities as well as provide advice on how to react to the weather information. In a number of discussions the participants preferred government forecast information to traditional sources because of the advice that came with it.The most common complaint regarding both traditional and nontraditional weather forecasting was that by the time households received a drought prediction, it is too late to respond in a meaningful way. Most of the households have few diversification options beyond selling portions of their herds in hopes of keeping their families and remaining livestock alive during the drought. But, when the government informs communities of a coming drought and advises them to sell livestock, the price drops dramatically reducing the benefits of selling and the options perceived by households. For example, when the community of Bokosa was informed by their DA that there would be a drought they collectively agreed on a strict herding protocol that included massive destocking of livestock and diversifying into nonherding activities. However, their plan relied on receiving good prices for their cattle, and because it was already the end of the dry season when their plan was made, the animals were thin and their market price poor. In response to the market prices, the community decided to wait until after the livestock had benefited from the next rain before selling. That rain never came, the cattle's health continued to degrade, and market prices fell as many other herds entered the market.Households currently draw on both traditional and nontraditional methods of climate information. Although they both have advantages and disadvantages, the newer sources seem to be gaining ground, especially with younger more educated individuals. Because there does not seem to be a stigma associated with using traditional or nontraditional methods, use of specific sources is mostly an issue of access, usefulness, and perceptions of accuracy.In some communities, herders expressed frustration at their own inability to diversify their herd composition because of their own inexperience and lack of knowledge concerning camel and goat care. Providing herders with information on camel and goat care may help them to diversify their holdings into drought tolerant animals.Currently, herders have very little market power due to high transaction costs and their poor negotiating position. They trek many miles with their animals to get to market. Upon arrival, herders are required to pay a per-head tax (one birr). During drought seasons their cattle may be too weak to make the trek back home. Even when their livestock are healthy enough to make the trek back, the herder has wasted days of labor and does not recoup the tax paid at market. In communities with cell service, herders use their phones to determine market conditions and, at times, set prices with buyers before making the trek to market. The areas without cell service are most likely the furthest from the tarmac and markets. These communities are at the greatest disadvantage when selling in markets. Providing them with access to market information (e.g., via radio) or communication with sellers (e.g., via shortwave, CB, or cell) may reduce the disadvantages associated with poor road access.Those with access to cell phones mentioned that they used them to learn about pasture and water conditions in other areas from friends and relatives. Weather, pasture, and water reports by radio or distribution of satellite imagery to the PA offices may be an avenue for disseminating similar information without the need for phones. As access to the internet increases via USB wireless modems this program could transition into central locations for accessing up-to-date information on demand.large piped water project, could alleviate the shortage of water for Borana communities, and have concurrent benefits such as a reduction in time spent by women gathering water. To maintain the benefits however, the groundwater resource must not be overexploited. This means that certain uses which might be attractive may not be feasible in the long run. For example, irrigated cultivation would likely not be sustainable on a large scale. Similarly, consideration needs to be given to potential \"externalities\" of these projects. For example, some pastoralists and researchers in the area believe that new water projects have exacerbated land degradation. Though the topic was not raised in discussions, care must also be taken to prevent the unsustainable use and rapid decline of groundwater through independently operated wells, which occurred in other parts of the world such as the Ogallala aquifer in the southwestern United States and in the state of Punjab in northern India.Strengthening institutions to manage commonly held land would likely facilitate many of the adaptation strategies mentioned. For example, livestock overpopulation and lack of initiative to clear bush were mentioned frequently in the team's discussions and interviews as being a problem of individuals acting against the interest of the larger group or community (due to the lack of incentive to do so). The extent of this \"tragedy of the commons\" needs to be determined, and steps must then be taken to strengthen measures that align the interests of individuals with those of communities. While many issues need to be resolved with respect to carbon sequestration, and it is uncertain if it will ever be feasible as a supplemental source of income in the area, the issue of how land tenure affects the sharing of benefits from sequestration programs would need to be better understood for it to even be considered.There are a number of opportunities for IBLI to both help reduce livestock mortality and help households adapt to their changing environment. Two areas of important potential complements between IBLI and adaptation strategies lie in supporting improved rangeland management and improved access to veterinary services and extension.As mentioned above (see Enhanced Rangeland Management), there are a number of natural resource management strategies that appear to have high potential for benefiting communities but require a great deal of organization and cooperation within and between communities. If IBLI's implementation strategy supports community-level rangeland management capacity and promotes the creation and implementation of a sustainable land-use plan, it could have large positive and lasting impacts on the landscape. According to community members; forest preserves, buffer areas, and community ranches reduce livestock mortality through increased access to pasture during drought and provide potential income sources for community members. Rangeland management has the potential to reduce exposure to risk, reducing payouts and premiums, while providing access to income that could be used to increase welfare or even to purchase insurance contracts.Supporting current livestock illness and disease management infrastructure is a second opportunity for IBLI. There is already a strong vaccination program in Ethiopia and some access to veterinary care and livestock medication. IBLI activities should ensure that they strengthen those institutions in their activities. Opportunities vary widely from simply including animal health workers in IBLI community education sessions to a more complicated premium structure that encourages aggressively addressing animal health issues. One realistic option could be to provide reduced-fee vaccinations (for vaccines not currently provided through the government vaccination program) or reduced-fee veterinary care for insured cattle. This could potentially be an extension of the existing government voucher program for veterinary products and services. Currently, the government provides vouchers to citizens and these vouchers are honored at private businesses which provide the veterinary products and 65 services to the farmers. For example, veterinary retailers may be more willing to extend credit to pastoralists whose cattle are insured through IBLI with the knowledge that if those cattle perish, the business may still be able to collect payment once insurance payouts are received by the insured. Therefore, by coupling IBLI with veterinary services, the health and wellbeing of livestock may improve overall, and may further strengthen the private provision of veterinary services, which would be a substantial indirect benefit of IBLI. Perhaps, as animal health improves, and animals are less likely to perish, the premiums may potentially be reduced, and therefore may be more widely accessible to the marginalized poor with very few (less than five) cattle."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3616913192.json b/main/part_2/3616913192.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38e076f8d82cfefe19bc759b9555fe3f150b92b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3616913192.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"dbf7bb507a73f2c9fed0ee9dcd475791","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/24685236-cc4e-4201-a918-7c8afb77c973/retrieve","id":"-488437527"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7370311e-8e98-41c8-9d4f-2050ae5ca35e","content":"4.0 de Creative Commons El CIP agradece a los donantes y organizaciones que apoyan globalmente su trabajo a través de sus contribuciones al Fondo Fiduciario del CGIAR: www.cgiar.org/funders Excellence in Breeding Platform RESEARCH PROGRAM ON Roots, Tubers and Bananas and Health RESEARCH PROGRAM ONPara más información, por favor contactar la sede principal del CIP. Av. La Molina 1895, La Molina. Apartado 1558, Lima 12, Perú.Aumento de oportunidades de los medios de subsistencia y desarrollo de cadenas inclusivas de valor a gran escala.Intensificación sostenible de los sistemas agroalimentarios mediante la resiliencia climática y la agricultura biodiversa.Mejoramiento de la seguridad nutricional y alimentaria.MÁS DE 100,000 HOGARES DE BANGLADESH en riesgo de desnutrición asistidos con camote de pulpa anaranjada con provitamina A.2.9 MILLION DE HOGARES de siete países asiáticos han adoptado variedades de papa y camote generadas con germoplasma del CIP.COOPERATION 88, VARIEDAD MEJORADA POR EL CIP, GENERÓ HASTA USD 3.73 MIL MILLONES a los agricultores y consumidores de la provincia de Yunnan en un periodo de 20 años.3 1 2 mejoramiento de la productividad para aumentar el valor de venta de papa de los pequeños agricultores. Mediante un enfoque de finca modelo, el proyecto ha construido una red de agricultores de papa que proporciona servicios técnicos y de comercialización, intercambio de conocimientos y semillas de papa de alta calidad. Se espera que los productores de semilla de papa participantes aumenten en 233% sus ganancias anuales por hectárea al tiempo que suministran semillas de papa de calidad a aproximadamente 15,000 pequeños agricultores, lo que puede aumentar sus rendimientos en 66%.Impulso a la oferta y demanda de papa en el sudeste de Asia, Vietnam Inversor: Fundación Syngenta (2016-21) A medida que el cambio climático amenaza a la seguridad alimentaria, aumenta la urgencia de contar con variedades resistentes de los principales cultivos. Este proyecto se enfoca en el mejoramiento de variedades de papa de maduración precoz y tolerantes al estrés para impulsar la productividad y mejorar los ingresos de los agricultores de Asia. Los científicos del CIP trabajaron en estrecha colaboración con investigadores de Corea del Sur y Vietnam con el fin de seleccionar progenitores adaptables y resistentes a enfermedades para el mejoramiento. Después del cruzamiento en la sede central del CIP, la progenie fue sometida a pruebas in vitro para comprobar su tolerancia al calor, las sequías y la salinidad, y se seleccionaron los clones avanzados para su posterior evaluación. Se están seleccionando y multiplicando los clones más resistentes al clima para una mayor difusión en el sur, centro y este de Asia, al tiempo que se trabaja con la HZPC y otras empresas para mejorar la producción y comercialización de papa en la región.Inversor: IFAD (2011-19) Combinando la investigación, las alianzas y la capacitación, FoodSTART+ mejoró la seguridad alimentaria y la capacidad de recuperación de los medios de subsistencia entre comunidades vulnerables de India, Indonesia, Filipinas y Vietnam. Trabajando en estrecha colaboración con los gobiernos y con IFAD, el proyecto ayudó a institucionalizar el enfoque de escuelas de negocios para agricultores de 6 a 10 meses de duración que les permitió a los pequeños agricultores desarrollar y comercializar nuevos productos. Lo que comenzó en Filipinas con seis escuelas piloto en 2011 se había convertido en 150 escuelas en 2019, con un 79% de mujeres graduadas. Desde entonces el enfoque ha sido adoptado por agencias gubernamentales y ONG.Papa biodiversa y nutritiva -Perú, Nepal y Bután Inversor: Unión Europea (2015-19) El cambio climático está cobrando un alto precio a las comunidades de las montañas de Bután, Nepal y Perú. El proyecto tuvo por objeto aumentar las capacidades de las instituciones nacionales de investigación agrícola -trabajando con los agricultores-para desarrollar variedades de papa climáticamente inteligentes con altos niveles de micronutrientes. Durante este proceso, los científicos aprendieron cómo incorporar las preferencias de los agricultores en las futuras estrategias de mejoramiento y entrega, que fueron clave para el éxito del mejoramiento de papa.Inversor: USAID (2016-19) Este proyecto contribuyó a aumentar la resistencia ante impactos del cambio climático tales como sequías y veranos más cálidos, mediante la liberación de variedades de papa y camote tolerantes a la sequía y el calor. En fincas modelo se probaron clones nutritivos de camote de pulpa anaranjada y se promovieron a través de huertos escolares y programas sociales para jóvenes. Las variedades mejoradas de papa y las prácticas de manejo aumentaron hasta en un 53% los rendimientos. El potenciamiento de las capacidades de los socios locales impulsará la difusión de materiales de siembra de calidad de variedades de altos rendimientos adaptadas a las condiciones locales para reducir la desnutrición, aumentar la productividad y mejorar los ingresos.Papas para la seguridad alimentaria, la nutrición y el bienestar económico -Haryana Inversor: Gobierno estatal de Haryana (2018-21) El objetivo de este proyecto es aumentar el acceso de los agricultores a variedades de papa de rendimiento precoz, resistentes al calor y al virus y promover la intensificación sostenible del uso de la tierra para impulsar la producción, la seguridad alimentaria, la nutrición y los ingresos en el estado de Haryana. Los científicos están seleccionado variedades de papa adecuadas para multiplicación y diseminación y promoviendo la producción de semillas por parte de los agricultores y empresas especializadas.Intensificación sostenible de papa para lograr la autosuficiencia en Odisha, India (2019-2020) Inversor: Gobierno de Odisha Si bien Odisha produce un excedente de arroz, solo satisface el 15-20 % de la demanda de papa. Debido a los altos costos de la semilla, el almacenamiento inadecuado, los deficientes vínculos con el mercado y las significativas fluctuaciones de precios, el cultivo ha disminuido enormemente en los años recientes. Este proyecto brinda apoyo técnico, incluyendo la introducción de variedades de papa resilientes de maduración precoz y prácticas agrícolas mejoradas, para potenciar los ingresos de los pequeños agricultores y generar empleos a lo largo de la cadena de suministro de la papa. La introducción de papa de maduración precoz facilitará la siembra del cultivo entre las cosechas de arroz. Los primeros ensayos en Taraboisasan y Khanizpur indican que existe potencial para duplicar la rentabilidad de los sistemas arroceros al reducir los costos de producción.Inversor: Gobierno de la India En colaboración con científicos del Instituto Central de Investigación de Papa, el CIP está proporcionando germoplasma y ayudando con ensayos de campo a desarrollar variedades de madurez precoz y resistentes al calor para mejorar los rendimientos de los pequeños agricultores de los estados de Assam y Odisha. Uno de los primeros clones de papa -Kufri Limafue liberado en 2017 y los agricultores están obteniendo rendimientos y ganancias 20% mayores, ya que pueden sembrar esta variedad más temprano en la temporada y alcanzar precios premium en el mercado. En 2018, el CIP suministró 20,000 semillas de camote al Instituto Central de Investigación de Cultivos de Tubérculos, donde se han desarrollado 480 clones híbridos para una posterior evaluación. El CIP también está capacitando a los científicos para que conduzcan los futuros ensayos de campo para desarrollar variedades biofortificadas.Inversor: Gobierno del estado de Odisha (2013-21) En su segunda fase, el proyecto GAINS busca mejorar la seguridad alimentaria, la nutrición, los medios de subsistencia y la resistencia al cambio climático en el estado de Odisha. La fase I obtuvo un aumento de 25% en la producción y de 17% en la productividad de camote en los distritos seleccionados. En la fase II, los agricultores que cultivan papa y camote se están contactando con empresas procesadoras para vender esos productos a precios más altos. La maquinaria rentable adoptada por los agricultores debería aumentar sus ingresos a USD 400 por hectárea. Las variedades de papa y camote de maduración precoz serán liberadas e integradas en sistemas de agricultura intensiva sostenible, mejorando la disponibilidad de alimentos nutritivos a precios asequibles.Inversor: Gobierno del estado de Karnataka (2019-22) La productividad de papa en Karnataka está por debajo del © CIP/X. KaiyunEn los últimos 40 años el CIP ha colaborado activamente con sus socios nacionales e internacionales de Asia. Utilizando la diversidad genética de su banco de germoplasma, el CIP ha contribuido a la liberación de más de 100 variedades mejoradas de papa y camote en la región. Las variedades de papas de maduración precoz, resistentes a las enfermedades, al calor y a las sequías y tolerantes a la salinidad, y las de camote de pulpa anaranjada ricas en vitamina A han permitido que los agricultores de Asia produzcan alimentos más nutritivos y comercializables y que se adapten al cambio climático. Una estimación reciente sobre la adopción de papa en siete países de Asia estableció que 2.9 millones de hogares agrícolas cultivaban variedades relacionadas con el CIP.La oficina del CIP de Nueva Delhi actúa como el centro principal de actividades en Asia, con nacionales en China, Filipinas, Georgia y Vietnam. El CIP-Centro de China para el Asia Pacífico en Beijing es un moderno centro de I+D apoyado por el gobierno y promueve la cooperación y el aprendizaje sur-sur mediante la investigación científica, las tecnologías y la creación de capacidades. Un ejemplo es su liderazgo en el AsiaBlight, una plataforma de colaboración regional de científicos, agricultores y otras partes interesadas en mejorar el control de la enfermedad del tizón tardío de la papa.a economía asiática se ha expandido aceleradamente en años recientes, impulsada en parte por el rápido crecimiento demográfico y de la urbanización. Se estima que la población de clase media llegará a los 3.2 mil millones para 2030, frente a los 525 millones de 2009. Durante este periodo, se estima que las tasas del PIB per cápita en el continente se sextuplicarán hasta alcanzar los actuales ingresos per cápita de Europa. No obstante, muchos países todavía enfrentan retos significativos para lograr los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. El Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP) procura contribuir activamente a la transformación social y económica de la región ayudando al mismo tiempo a los países a hacer frente a retos como la COVID-19 y el cambio climático, e influyendo en la composición de sus canastas de alimentos con el fin de que incluyan alimentos más nutritivos. Esta transformación ofrece tremendas oportunidades para mejorar los ingresos y la seguridad nutricional de millones de pobladores urbanos y rurales pobres y la sostenibilidad de los sistemas agrícolas. promedio de la India pero la demanda está aumentando. Este nuevo centro de excelencia en la investigación permitirá al estado beneficiarse plenamente de la intensificación sostenible de la producción de papa y camote. A través del suministro de clones de élite y de capacitación científica, agronómica y comercial, además de la introducción de tecnologías adecuadas, el CIP trabajará con los socios locales para liberar variedades nutritivas de papa y camote preferidas por los agricultores y climáticamente inteligentes, y para mejorar los mercados para estos productos.Inversor: Banco Mundial (2018-23) Esta iniciativa de múltiples partes interesadas de los centros del CGIAR y socios nacionales busca añadir valor y mejorar la resiliencia de las cadenas de valor agrícolas seleccionadas. El CIP trabaja con pequeños agricultores de Assam para intensificar su producción y diversificar su base de ingresos a través de la introducción de papa de maduración precoz en los sistemas agroalimentarios dominados por el arroz. Con los pequeños agricultores se está probando un enfoque de labranza cero para el cultivo de papa en los arrozales durante la ventana de invierno que se presenta entre los dos ciclos de cultivo de arroz.Inversor: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) (2018-21) Los suelos fértiles del delta de Bangladesh están sometidos a una creciente salinización, que amenaza las vidas y los medios de subsistencia de los agricultores y otros pobladores. Apoyándose en proyectos anteriores del CIP-Bangladesh que llegaron a más de 100,000 agricultores con material de siembra de calidad de papa y camote, esta iniciativa está proveyendo capacitación agronómica, empresarial y de nutrición. Trabajando en estrecha colaboración con el Instituto de Investigación Agrícola de Bangladesh, 5,000 agricultores y 50 especialistas en nutrición comunitaria de seis comunidades, el proyecto facilitará la adopción de dietas mejoradas para unas 25,000 personas, aumentando la demanda de papa y camote.Alimentar el Futuro -Bangladesh: un enfoque de sistemas para una mejor nutrición Inversor: Agencia de los Estados Unidos para el Desarrollo Internacional (USAID) (2018-23) Los bangladesíes, especialmente las mujeres y los niños, continúan sufriendo altas tasas de desnutrición, lo que dificulta el desarrollo socioeconómico del país. Con un enfoque multisectorial y de varias partes interesadas, este proyecto busca fortalecer la capacidad de abordaje de las causas de la desnutrición mediante el análisis, diseño, implementación y aseguramiento de recursos para intervenciones con un enfoque nutricional.Impulso a la producción de papa para mejorar las condiciones de vida rurales -Georgia Inversor: Agencia Austriaca de Desarrollo (2017-20) Este proyecto está mejorando los medios de subsistencia de los agricultores y de las comunidades rurales de Georgia a través del aumento de la rentabilidad y sostenibilidad de los cultivos de papa y el fomento de las capacidades de las partes nacionales interesadas en la cadena de valor de la semilla de papa. Hasta inicios de 2020 el CIP había ayudado a mejorar las capacidades de manejo de semillas, identificación de enfermedades, salud integral de semillas y modelación de la degeneración de semillas de papa de más de 600 agricultores modelo, extensionistas y científicos.Inversor: USAID (2019-21) Trabajando en estrecha colaboración con el sector privado, el CIP está facilitando la adopción de tecnologías innovadoras de"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3620510898.json b/main/part_2/3620510898.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62ecaa9de8ba102052ea0039ad79e16d248e8c69 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3620510898.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e0e283fee06b4669dfcef500b8941cbd","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/336dccf2-98a3-401f-b764-65e241f979ad/retrieve","id":"-209718089"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2cf50c20-e06b-4923-981a-10511fa4f4a1","content":"La reproduction et la diffusion des différents chapitres de ce livre est encouragée sous licence Creative Commons (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.fr) sous réserve de faire figurer : -le copyright du CTA, conformément à la licence Creative Commons 4.0, en incluant le nom de l'auteur et le titre de l'article ou du chapitre ; -l'avertissement précisant que le CTA, l'UE ou le FIDA n'assument en aucun cas la responsabilité des vues, produits et services des auteurs. CTA, 2019. Innovation et promotion des chaînes de valeurs de produits agricoles locaux en Afrique. Série Capitalisation des expériences 10. Wageningen, Pays-Bas, CTA. ISBN 978-92-9081-645-4 Nous espérons que ces différents articles inspireront vos stratégies d'action et que l'innovation sera davantage mobilisée pour une transformation décisive du secteur agricole en Afrique.Le projet « Capitalisation des expériences pour un plus grand impact dans le développement rural » est mis en oeuvre dans différentes parties du monde par le Centre technique de coopération agricole et rurale (CTA), en collaboration avec l'Organisation des Nations unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture (FAO) et l'Institut interaméricain de coopération pour l'agriculture (IICA) avec le soutien financier du Fonds international de développement agricole (FIDA). Il vise à faciliter l'adoption d'un processus de capitalisation d'expérience dans les initiatives de développement rural dans le cadre desquelles il peut améliorer l'analyse, la documentation, le partage et l'utilisation d'enseignements et de bonnes pratiques dans une optique d'apprentissage continu, d'amélioration et de passage à grande échelle.Les cas présentés dans le présent livret ont été sélectionnés et rédigés par ceux et celles qui ont participé au projet. Les informations et opinions exprimées dans chacun des articles engagent la seule responsabilité de leur(s) auteur(s). La reproduction des contenus est autorisée sous réserve de mentionner la source.Le Centre technique de coopération agricole et rurale (CTA) est une institution internationale conjointe du Groupe des États d'Afrique, des Caraïbes et du Pacifique (ACP) et de l'Union européenne (UE). Le CTA opère dans le cadre de l'Accord de Cotonou et est financé par l'UE. Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur www.cta.int.Le Fonds international de développement agricole (FIDA) investit dans les populations rurales, les dotant des moyens d'augmenter leur sécurité alimentaire, d'améliorer la nutrition familiale et d'accroître leurs revenus. Le FIDA est ucne institution financière internationale et une agence spécialisée de l'Organisation des Nations unies dont le siège est situé à Rome, le hub alimentation et agriculture de l'ONU. Depuis 1978, il a accordé 18,5 milliards $ sous forme de subventions et de crédits à faible taux d'intérêt à près de 464 millions de personnes. Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur www.ifad.org.Ces travaux ont été réalisés avec le soutien financier du FIDA. Cependant, ils relèvent de la seule responsabilité de leur(s) auteur(s) et ne reflètent en aucun cas la position du CTA, de l'Union européenne ou du FIDA. L'utilisateur pourra apprécier le bien-fondé des propos tenus, des arguments formulés, des techniques expérimentales et des méthodes décrites dans le présent document.C ette publication est un nouveau volume rendant compte des résultats des exercices de capitalisation d'expériences réalisées dans le cadre du projet « Capitalisation des expériences pour un plus grand impact dans le développement rural » mis en oeuvre par le CTA, IICA et la FAO avec l'appui du FIDA. Les pratiques décrites ont été développées par différents acteurs agricoles avec le soutien d'organisations et de partenaires divers.L'innovation est au coeur de ce volume, du point de vue des techniques de production, des plates-formes d'innovation et de l'accès au financement. L'innovation agricole, qui peut se définir comme l'ensemble des processus liés au développement de produits, de services ou de procédés agricoles, nouveaux ou améliorés, du maillon de la production à celle de la consommation, est un facteur déterminant de la modernisation et de la performance du secteur. Il s'agit d'un des domaines stratégiques dans lesquels il est crucial de davantage investir en Afrique. Certains articles traitent des actions réalisées par des plates-formes d'innovation, à l'image de celles mises en place au Bénin dans la filière riz, ou au Burkina Faso dans la filière niébé. L'importance de ces plates-formes n'est plus à démontrer. Il est important de mieux faire connaître leurs actions, de faciliter leur durabilité, de les connecter davantage aux systèmes nationaux d'innovation agricole (lorsqu'elles sont mises en place par des acteurs non gouvernementaux), de renforcer la prise en compte des savoirs locaux, l'implication du secteur privé, des chercheurs ainsi que celle des jeunes. D'autres articles rendent compte des expériences d'initiatives s'attachant à faciliter, souvent de manière novatrice, l'inclusion financière et l'accès au financement, notamment au niveau des femmes rurales (voir l'article de Haoua Kone-Barry ou celui rédigé par Alain Razafindratsima). Dans son rapport « Unlocking growth in the era of farmer finance » la firme internationale Dalberg Global Development Advisors nous informe que 150 milliards de dollars de besoins en financement des petits producteurs dans les pays en développement ne sont pas comblés. Il est donc important d'innover également pour l'accès au financement agricole, y compris en mobilisant les technologies numériques de communication. L e potentiel des produits agricoles locaux reste insuffisamment valorisé pour l'amélioration de la sécurité alimentaire et des revenus des populations rurales en Afrique de l'Ouest. La valorisation des produits locaux comme le riz local, le niébé, le fonio, le mil et le sésame est possible à travers la promotion des chaînes de valeurs incluant les maillons clé de la production, la transformation et la commercialisation. De nombreuses technologies modernes de productions agricoles ont été rejetées du fait de leur inadéquation face aux réalités agro-climatiques, socio-économiques et culturelles des petits producteurs. Cependant les contraintes auxquelles doivent faire quotidiennement face ces derniers nécessitent la quête permanente de nouvelles solutions efficaces et adaptées à leurs conditions. L'innovation agricole est pourtant nécessaire pour le développement des chaînes de valeurs en Afrique de l'Ouest. Cette innovation porte non seulement sur les nouvelles technologies agricoles mais aussi sur l'espace de production de ces technologies et les modèles de financement agricole.Le concept de plateforme d'innovation se réfère à un ensemble de parties prenantes ayant des intérêts communs autour d'une problématique donnée, d'un défi ou d'une opportunité en vue d'améliorer les performances d'une filière au profit des différents acteurs. La création de tels espaces multi-acteurs, favorisant l'innovation technologique et le développement des relations d'affaires entre acteurs, permet aujourd'hui de donner de la valeur à ces produits agricoles jadis négligés. Des expériences conduites ces dernières années pour accompagner l'innovation paysanne ont produit des résultats très encourageants dans divers domaines comme la conservation des sols et des eaux, le développement de nouveaux itinéraires techniques de production et la nutrition animale.Ismail Moumouni est consultant pour CTA et pour diverses institutions nationales et internationales. Il a facilité plusieurs processus de capitalisation des experiences en Afrique de l'Ouest. ismailmm@gmail.comIsmail Moumouni L e riz est l'une des filières prioritaires retenues pour servir de levier au développement agricole au Bénin. Incontournable pour la sécurité alimentaire, sa consommation est en constante augmentation. Cette forte demande de riz est comblée par l'importation, en provenance d'Asie, de riz non étuvé, propre, moins cher, mais aussi moins nutritif. En effet, la productivité du riz au Bénin est faible, du fait de l'utilisation de techniques non optimales (variétés locales, semis à la volée, etc.), tandis que la transformation primaire basée sur l'étuvage ne garantit pas sa qualité. Les femmes étuveuses ont des difficultés à s'approvisionner en riz paddy pendant toute l'année et les relations d'affaires entre les acteurs de la chaîne sont très faibles. Ces acteurs ne sont pas suffisamment bien organisés pour conquérir les marchés urbains. Les institutions de recherche ont mis au point des techniques améliorées de production et de transformation.Le projet d'Appui à l'amélioration de la sécurité alimentaire par le renforcement de la compétitivité de la chaîne de valeur ajoutée riz local étuvé (PARCR) a été initié pour améliorer la compétitivité du riz local. D'une durée de trois ans, ce projet de recherchedéveloppement fut une réussite, puisqu'il a engendré une augmentation significative de la consommation locale. Il nous permet donc de tirer plusieurs enseignements utiles pour la promotion des chaînes de valeur locales en général.Le projet PARCR a été mis en oeuvre dans deux communes du département de l'Alibori (Banikoara et Gogonou) par l'ONG DEDRAS en collaboration avec l'organisation néerlandaise Woord en Daad, l'Institut national des recherches agricoles du Bénin (INRAB) et la faculté d'agronomie de l'université de Parakou (FA/UP). DEDRAS était chargée de la coordination et des interventions sur le terrain. L'INRAB a piloté les processus d'innovation technique dans la production et la transformation du riz paddy. La FA/UP a piloté les études/recherches et les processus d'innovation organisationnelle et institutionnelle. Woord en Daad a apporté une assistance technique à toutes les activités du projet. L'enquête de référence effectuée au démarrage du projet a permis d'identifier trois piliers sur lesquels s'appuyer pour améliorer la compétitivité du riz local étuvé : les piliers « Plateforme d'innovation », « Production » et « Transformation ». Une plateforme d'innovation est un groupement d'individus représentant souvent des organisations, réunis dans le but de trouver des solutions aux problèmes communs qui limitent leurs performances. Ici, elle est composée de producteurs, transformatrices, commerçants et consommateurs de riz, de structures de recherche et de vulgarisation, de meuniers pour l'égrenage, de soudeurs pour la fabrication locale de kit d'étuvageDe 2015 à 2017, l'ONG DEDRAS et ses partenaires ont mis en oeuvre, au Bénin, le projet d'Appui à l'amélioration de la sécurité alimentaire par le renforcement de la compétitivité de la chaîne de valeur ajoutée riz local étuvé (PARCR). Reposant sur trois piliers synergiques, ce projet a permis d'améliorer la production et la qualité du riz paddy grâce à l'adoption du système de riziculture intensif, l'efficacité de l'étuvage et la qualité du riz étuvé grâce à des kits d'étuvage, et de renforcer les relations d'affaires entre les acteurs de la chaîne de valeur riz local étuvé.Couverture Avec le projet PARCR, les paysans améliorent la production du riz grâce à l'adoption du système de riziculture intensif et d'éleveurs pour la gestion des parcours et la valorisation du son de riz. Concernant le pilier « Production », des Champs écoles paysans (CEP) ont été installés pour promouvoir le système de riziculture intensif (SRI) qui s'appuie sur les principes de gestion des mauvaises herbes, de la fertilité du sol et de l'eau dans une vingtaine de villages par commune. Le CEP est une unité de démonstration, d'apprentissage et d'application réunissant environ 25 producteurs. Des rencontres périodiques sont organisées pour partager des expériences sur les pratiques agricoles. Enfin, dans le cadre du pilier « Transformation », deux modules de formation ont été déroulés au profit des femmes étuveuses. Le premier concernait les bonnes pratiques hygiéniques de production de riz étuvé, et le second la technologie améliorée d'étuvage du riz utilisant un kit composé de marmite et bac d'étuvage. Par ailleurs, un technicien a été recruté, formé et positionné dans chaque commune pour accompagner la mise en oeuvre des activités quotidiennes du projet.Le pilier « Plateforme d'innovation » fut déployé en premier afin de mettre les acteurs en relation et de créer un espace d'information, d'échange, d'identification et de résolution collectives des problèmes. Dans son exécution, il s'agissait d'abord d'identifier les acteurs impliqués dans la chaîne de valeur riz local étuvé, puis d'organiser avec eux un atelier de sensibilisation, de structuration de la plateforme, d'approfondissement de diagnostic et de planification d'activités prioritaires. Au démarrage, les participants s'attendaient à ce que les charges de leur participation à la plateforme soient supportées par le projet. L'information n'était pas parvenue à temps à certains acteurs, comme les éleveurs peuls. Ces derniers, concernés par la valorisation du son de riz, sont dispersés dans des hameaux qui ne sont pas toujours couverts par les réseaux de téléphonie mobile. Pour surmonter ces contraintes, les invitations aux activités ont été envoyées beaucoup plus tôt aux participants pour permettre à chacun de prendre ses dispositions, les facilitateurs des plateformes ayant identifié des personnes de contact servant de relai de communication dans les villages. Pour réduire les charges liées au déplacement, de petites réunions de proximité furent préférées aux grands rassemblements qui restaient cependant nécessaires. Une fois les acteurs mis en relation, l'ampleur des obstacles à l'amélioration de la production et de l'étuvage de riz paddy s'est très vite révélée. Le processus d'innovation s'est alors poursuivi dans les maillons spécifiques de la production et de la transformation.L'accompagnement des CEP, maillon central du pilier « Production », a consisté à identifier les producteurs intéressés, constituer des groupes d'apprentissage par village, organiser l'apprentissage et suivre les Une fois les acteurs mis en relation, l'ampleur des obstacles à l'amélioration de la production et de l'étuvage de riz paddy s'est très vite révélée.producteurs. Très tôt, les contraintes auxquelles les producteurs étaient confrontés pour l'adoption du SRI sont remontées à la plateforme. Parmi elles : l'indisponibilité d'engrais et de semences de la variété IR841, qui leur a été recommandée dans le SRI, la réticence des structures de microcrédit à en octroyer aux producteurs -le faible niveau d'organisation des filières ne leur garantissant pas le recouvrement des créances -, ainsi que la pénibilité et l'exigence en temps du semis en ligne. Les facilitateurs de plateformes ont donc aidé les producteurs à rechercher un arrangement avec les structures de distribution d'intrants (engrais et semence IR841) et les institutions de microcrédit. Des mécanismes ont été élaborés pour mettre en confiance les institutions de services, basés sur la mise en gage d'une quantité de riz paddy dont la valeur correspond à peu près au montant des dettes du producteur. Collecté juste après les récoltes, ce riz est vendu plus tard à des prix plus élevés pour le remboursement des dettes. Pour faire face à l'exigence en temps du SRI, les producteurs ont formé et motivé leurs enfants, surtout les filles, pour effectuer le semis en ligne.Dans le cadre du pilier « Transformation », les facilitateurs ont identifié les transformatrices et organisé des formations sur l'utilisation du kit d'étuvage. Les groupements d'étuveuses ont reçu un kit d'étuvage et furent ensuite suivis dans l'usage de ce kit. Plusieurs contraintes sont apparues dès la première campagne agricole, notamment l'éloignement du point de vente, qui augmentait le coût d'acquisition des kits, la réticence des structures de microcrédit à octroyer des prêts aux étuveuses (leur permettant de constituer des stocks de riz paddy) qu'ils jugent insuffisamment bien organisées pour inspirer confiance, ou, plus inquiétant, le rejet inattendu par ces dernières de la variété IR841 en raison des plaintes adressées par les consommateurs sur la qualité de ce riz après cuisson. En réponse à ces contraintes, le projet a organisé la formation d'artisans locaux, qui ont fabriqué des kits d'étuvage dans chaque commune, et élargi les accords de crédit obtenus en faveur des producteurs aux étuveuses. En outre, les chercheurs de l'Institut national de recherche ont conduit des essais qui ont permis de mettre au point une technique appropriée de cuisson du riz IR841 à laquelle les « femmes vendeuses du riz » ont été formées.Le principal critère d'évaluation du pilier « Plateforme d'innovation » est l'amélioration des relations entre les acteurs en retenant comme indicateurs la fréquence de rencontres d'échange et de travail, le nombre de goulots d'étranglement identifiés et l'établissement de nouveaux liens d'affaires. Nous avons ainsi noté des échanges plus fréquents entre les membres des plateformes sur diverses préoccupations (via téléphone ou de petites séances de discussions au village) à la faveur desquels des obstacles ont pu être identifiés et traités. Nous avons également constaté l'établissement de relations d'affaires entre les acteurs. Les forgerons fabriquent des kits d'étuvage qu'ils mettent à disposition des étuveuses à crédit. Les étuveuses s'approvisionnent en riz paddy chez les producteurs SRI, qu'elles préfinancent pour garantir leur approvisionnement en riz paddy de qualité.L'amélioration des rendements est le critère qui nous permet d'évaluer le pilier « Production », les indicateurs étant le niveau d'adoption de bonnes pratiques agricoles par les producteurs et l'augmentation du rendement et de la qualité du riz paddy. Désormais, plus de 75 % des producteurs pratiquent le SRI : semis en ligne à bonne date (15-30 juin), application de fumure, démariage, etc. En conséquence, les producteurs utilisent moins de semences, multiplient leur rendement par deux et obtiennent du riz paddy plein, donc de meilleure qualité. Un producteur de riz de Banikoara témoigne : « Au cours de la campagne agricole 2016, je me suis contenté d'une petite superficie de moins de 0,25 ha de riz. Lors de la récolte, tout le monde a été surpris de constater que ma production était supérieure à celles de mes frères, juste en adoptant une bonne technique de semis. J'en conclus qu'une grande emblavure ne garantit pas toujours une bonne production. » Les innovations majeures introduites et développées au sein de la plateforme d'innovation ont su répondre aux attentes des productrices. Devenue une référence dans la sous-région ouest-africaine, elle leur a permis de doubler leurs revenus.L a productivité du niébé s'est accrue au Burkina Faso dans les années 2000 : de 300 kg/ha dans les années 1980, elle est passée à un rendement moyen de 500 kg/ha (Comité interprofessionnel filières céréales et niébé, 2010). La région du Centre-Nord, dont relève la province du Bam, est l'une des principales zones pourvoyeuses de niébé, dont la culture est pratiquée sur de petites superficies (0,25 ha en moyenne) avec une faible maîtrise ou une méconnaissance des technologies améliorées de production et de transformation. Une enquête diagnostique, réalisée en 2010 par le Programme d'appui aux filières agro-sylvo-pastorales (PAFASP) sur la filière niébé dans la zone agroécologique concernée, a fait ressortir plusieurs opportunités justifiant la mise en place d'une plateforme d'innovation pour booster la filière. Forte de 2000 membres, l'Union provinciale féminine Namagbzanga (UPFN) de la province du Bam, localité située à 120 km au nord de Ouagadougou, la capitale du Burkina, est l'organisation porteuse de la plateforme d'innovation sur le niébé. Avant sa mise en place, les femmes de l'UPFN étaient confrontées à quatre contraintes majeures : une méconnaissance des semences de qualité, un accès limité aux terres cultivables, un faible accès aux sources de financement et l'absence d'une chaîne de commercialisation suffisamment organisée et fonctionnelle. « Ces difficultés ont découragé plusieurs femmes, qui ont abandonné leurs champs Le Programme de productivité agricole en Afrique de l'Ouest (PPAAO)/Burkina a appuyé, en juillet 2013, l'Union provinciale féminine Namagbzanga (UPFN) de la province du Bam au Burkina Faso pour la mise en place d'une plateforme d'innovation sur le niébé. En moins de trois ans, l'introduction au sein de cette plateforme de cinq nouvelles variétés de niébé à haut rendement, le plaidoyer pour l'accès des femmes aux terres cultivables et au crédit bancaire et l'amélioration du circuit de commercialisation ont permis de booster la productivité du niébé et de doubler le revenu des productrices.Le concept de plateforme d'innovation se réfère à un ensemble de parties prenantes liées par des intérêts communs autour d'une problématique donnée, d'un défi ou d'une opportunité en vue d'améliorer les performances d'une filière au profit des différents acteurs. La plateforme d'innovation peut être comprise comme une collaboration entre plusieurs acteurs/ actrices (producteurs/productrices, chercheurs, structures d'appui-conseil, institutions financières, autorités locales, chefs coutumiers, projets et programmes, médias…) pour stimuler et soutenir le développement d'une filière agricole.technologies et assuré, en collaboration avec le PPAAO, le rapportage des activités.Pour rendre effective et fonctionnelle la plateforme d'innovation sur le niébé, trois étapes importantes ont été conduites : i) identification des acteurs, des rôles respectifs et diagnostic des contraintes ; ii) analyse et validation des actions à conduire en vue de lever les contraintes ; iii) développement sur le terrain des actions validées par les acteurs.Les activités menées dans le cadre de la plateforme d'innovation se sont décomposées en quatre grands volets qui ont tous conduit à des résultats positifs. Cinq nouvelles variétés de niébé à haut rendement ont été introduites au sein de la plateforme d'innovation. Les productrices ont adopté et diffusé, à travers des visites commentées, ces variétés qui produisent en moyenne 800 kg/ha en 60 jours contre 500 kg/ha en 90 jours pour les anciennes variétés. « Ces variétés sont appréciées par les productrices grâce à leur haut rendement, leur cycle court, leurs gros grains et la couleur blanche des grains, » atteste la présidente de l'UPFN et présidente de la plateforme d'innovation, Awa Ouédraogo.Dans plusieurs villages, des chefs coutumiers ont mené des plaidoyers en vue de faciliter l'accès des femmes aux terres cultivables et de plus grandes superficies. Grâce à cet engagement, les superficies octroyées à ces dernières ont atteint dans certains villages trois ha alors qu'elles ne disposaient que de 0,5 ha auparavant. C'est notamment le cas du village de Yalka, dans la commune de Kongoussi, et des villages de Rouko, Gankaré, Sabcè et Guibaré.Des partenariats ont été mis en place avec des institutions de microfinance, ce qui a permis d'accorder 200 millions FCFA de crédit à 800 membres de la plateforme d'innovation en 2016 contre 75 millions FCFA avant sa mise en place. « Notre participation aux visites commentées sur les parcelles de production du niébé nous a convaincus de la qualité du travail et des rendements possibles, nous encourageant ainsi à augmenter les crédits accordés aux femmes pour la production du niébé, » reconnaît Aminata Cissé, responsable de la Caisse populaire de Kongoussi (chef-lieu de la province du Bam).Enfin, le circuit de commercialisation avec la SONAGESS s'est amélioré et renforcé : 465 t de niébé ont été vendues en 2016 pour un montant de 120 millions FCFA contre des ventes moyennes annuelles de 280 t pour un montant 72 millions FCFA avant la mise en place de la plateforme d'innovation. « J'ai réalisé, en 2016, un bénéfice de 665 000 FCFA après laLes acteurs ayant contribué à cet accroissement de revenus sont segmentés en trois catégories : les acteurs du changement (instituts de recherche, services d'appui-conseil, décideurs politiques, chefs coutumiers, médias), les catalyseurs du changement (projets et programmes de développement, institutions de microfinance, structures d'achat) et les bénéficiaires du changement (organisation des productrices porteuse de la plateforme d'innovation). Ces acteurs ont joué un rôle complémentaire dans la conduite des activités. Ainsi, l'Institut de l'environnement et de recherches agricoles (INERA) et l'Institut de recherche en sciences appliquée et technologies (RSAT) ont proposé les technologies à adopter et assuré les formations relatives à ces dernières. La Direction générale des productions végétales (DGPV) a identifié et proposé les technologies à adopter, et capitalisé les acquis au profit du système de vulgarisation et d'appui-conseil agricole au niveau national. Les décideurs politiques et administratifs, parmi lesquels le Haut-commissaire (la plus haute autorité administrative au niveau provincial), ont contribué à la sensibilisation des acteurs politiques (députés, maires, élus locaux...) et à la résolution des problèmes. Les chefs de villages ont quant à eux aidé à la sensibilisation des populations sur les questions susceptibles d'entraver la bonne marche de la plateforme et mené des plaidoyers pour l'accès des femmes aux terres cultivables et de plus grande superficie. Les radios locales ont assuré la diffusion de l'information sur la plateforme et les activités en direction du public au niveau local et national. Le Programme de productivité agricole en Afrique de l'Ouest (PPAAO)/Burkina a apporté son appui financier et technique aux activités de la plateforme et assuré, en collaboration avec le comité technique de gestion de la plateforme d'innovation, le suivi et la capitalisation des acquis. Les caisses populaires facilitent l'accès des productrices et transformatrices de niébé aux crédits. La Société nationale de gestion de sécurité alimentaire (SONAGESS) assure l'achat et le stockage du niébé. Enfin, l'UPFN a proposé plusieurs innovations, animé l'ensemble du groupe des producteurs et productrices engagés à adopter des La plateforme d'innovation permet l'établissement de relations solides et de confiance entre les acteurs de la microfinance et les productrices, ce qui a contribué à accroître le montant des crédits accordés aux membres. En outre, le contrat d'achat entre la SONAGESS et la plateforme d'innovation garantit la commercialisation de la production.Les productrices ont adopté ces variétés qui produisent en moyenne 800 kg/ha en 60 jours contre 500 kg/ha en 90 jours pour les anciennes variétés. vente à la SONAGESS de 5 400 kg de niébé, affirme Bibata Gansoré, 52 ans, productrice dans la province du Bam, mariée et mère de six enfants. Le bénéfice a servi à payer des vivres, se soigner, payer la scolarité des enfants et contribuer au bon fonctionnement de la plateforme d'innovation. »Ces résultats probants ont été obtenus grâce à la conjugaison d'une série de facteurs. En premier lieu, l'engagement de l'Union porteuse de la plateforme d'innovation a été crucial. Une union bien structurée, dynamique, avec un partenariat diversifié et disposant d'animateurs endogènes servant de relais pour l'encadrement des productrices.Deuxièmement, la résolution des conflits s'est faite de façon endogène. Ce fut notamment le cas pour l'harmonisation des prix de vente du niébé : des échanges entre les acteurs de la production ont permis de s'accorder sur les prix à pratiquer. Cela a conduit à l'utilisation d'outils conventionnels de mesure. L'organisation de collectes communes et l'acheminement groupé des productions vers la SONAGESS et les sites de foires et marchés du niébé ont permis de résoudre les problèmes liés au transport. Quant aux difficultés d'obtention de terres cultivables et de plus grande superficie aux femmes pour la production de niébé, elles ont été surmontéesEn dépit des succès enregistrés, des défis restent à relever pour rendre la plateforme d'innovation plus performante. Il s'agit, entre autres, d'accroître la production pour répondre à une demande de plus en plus croissante, de renforcer les capacités techniques et financières des acteurs de la chaîne de valeur niébé, mais aussi de renforcer la capacité des membres de la plateforme d'innovation à l'utilisation des outils de gestion.En novembre 2015, la plateforme d'innovation du niébé a obtenu le prix de la meilleure plateforme d'innovation de l'Afrique de l'Ouest décerné à Dakar par le Conseil ouest et centre africain pour la Recherche et le développement agricoles (CORAF/WECARD) en collaboration avec la Banque mondiale. La récompense de 6 millions FCFA a permis de financer la construction d'un magasin de stockage de niébé de 100 t à Kongoussi (chef-lieu de la province du Bam). La construction de ce magasin marque ainsi la volonté affichée des acteurs de la plateforme d'innovation d'inscrire leur action dans la durée.La reproductibilité et le passage à l'échelle de cette expérience se sont manifestés à travers la mise en place de plateformes d'innovation dans d'autres filières, en l'occurrence le riz, la mangue, le karité et la tomate. Le prix obtenu à Dakar a par ailleurs fortement accru la notoriété de la plateforme d'innovation. Ainsi, de nombreux partenaires de la sous-région (Bénin, Côte d'Ivoire, Gambie, Ghana, Mali, Niger et Sénégal) sont venus en voyage d'études pour s'inspirer du modèle burkinabé. Les actions d'Afrique Verte dans la filière fonio ont consisté à relancer la consommation du fonio dans les marchés urbains dominés par un fonio de qualité médiocre décrié pour la présence de grains de sable et pour un emballage jugé peu attractif. Elle a oeuvré à positionner le fonio comme une source complémentaire de céréales pouvant contribuer à la sécurité alimentaire et nutritionnelle au Burkina Faso. Plusieurs acteurs ont été impliqués dans la réalisation de ces actions ; des acteurs directs (fournisseurs de semences, producteurs, transformatrices et consommateurs) et des acteurs Ce document décrit les principales actions conduites par Afrique Verte Burkina Faso depuis 2009 pour la relance de la consommation du fonio. Il présente les innovations opérées par les transformatrices de céréales pour permettre au fonio de gagner en notoriété auprès des ménages urbains et d'être accepté dans les supermarchés et les restaurants.• l'organisation d'ateliers de contractualisation entre producteurs et transformatrices pour faciliter l'accès au fonio ;• la stimulation des femmes urbaines et rurales à la transformation du fonio ;• la promotion de nouvelles technologies de décorticage du fonio associant les équipementiers et les structures de recherche nationales ;• l'analyse périodique de la qualité du fonio issu des unités de transformation artisanales dans des laboratoires agrées ;• l'organisation de journées de dégustation réunissant des ménages, des consommateurs urbains et des leaders d'opinion ;• la facilitation de la participation des femmes transformatrices aux foires et salons autour des produits agricoles au Burkina Faso et à l'étranger ;• la facilitation de l'accès aux crédits pour les femmes transformatrices.Ces activités sont menées à bien grâce au dispositif technique et organisationnel efficace développé par Afrique Verte, qui comprend une coordination technique avec des animatrices d'appui. Cette équipe permanente est renforcée par des experts en qualité et en finance. innovation. L'organisation des femmes au sein d'un réseau actif de transformatrices à Bobo Dioulasso, Banfora, Ouaga, avec un apprentissage entre pairs, une solidarité et une émulation, et assurant le lien entre les producteurs de fonio et le marché, a permis d'aboutir à des résultats plus rapidement que prévu.Comme le montre le témoignage de Madame Gnoula, les femmes transformatrices ont su intégrer les exigences des consommateurs urbains en termes d'hygiène et d'emballage. Elles ont prouvé qu'elles pouvaient, avec de petits outils et de la rigueur, proposer des produits adaptés à la demande. La capacité de ces femmes pourtant peu instruites à opérer des innovations complexes et à s'inscrire dans une logique de mobilisation de crédits pour propulser les affaires a aussi constitué un facteur de réussite des actions entreprises. Soulignons toutefois que s'il est utile de prendre en compte les suggestions des consommateurs pour offrir des produits de qualité, les distributeurs jouent également un rôle clé dans le succès de l'augmentation de la consommation de ces produits dans les marchés urbains. Ils méritent d'être associés aux stratégies de commercialisation dès le départ. Malgré les difficultés rencontrées lors de la mise en oeuvre de l'initiative (faible réceptivité des femmes à l'innovation, sècheresses, attaques de parasites, problème de commercialisation de l'huile du sésame), le processus de structuration des femmes autour de la transformation du sésame a induit plusieurs résultats et impacts positifs. Les activités du groupement Wafakay, dans la commune de Téra à l'ouest du Niger, se résument à la commercialisation des céréales, au petit commerce et à l'embouche de petits ruminants. Ce groupement essentiellement constitué de femmes est membre de l'union Harey Ban, dont l'objectif est d'améliorer les conditions de vie des femmes et des enfants à travers des activités génératrices de revenu. À ces activités s'ajoute désormais la fortification d'un aliment traditionnellement consommé au Niger : le mil.Le projet DIAPOCO fait intervenir plusieurs acteurs : i) les membres de l'union et du groupement, pour la mise en oeuvre des activités sur le terrain, l'organisation des femmes et la gestion du petit matériel ; ii) le centre de santé, pour la sensibilisation autour de la farine fortifiée afin de promouvoir sa consommation, le suivi et l'encadrement des femmes ; iii) des élus locaux fortement impliqués, pour l'intégration de l'initiative dans le plan de développement communal ; iv) des radios, pour mettre en oeuvre la stratégie de communication visant àLa farine fortifiée est un mélange de farine (ici, l'aliment véhicule est le mil) et de prémix. Spécialement conçu pour la fortification des farines, ce prémix contient du fer (sous forme de sulfate de fer), du zinc (sous forme d'oxyde de zinc) et de l'acide folique sur support d'amidon de maïs. Pour la fabrication de la farine, le mil est nettoyé, puis décortiqué chez des meuniers. Il est ensuite lavé et séché avant d'être torréfié et réduit en farine dans un moulin. La farine fortifiée est réalisée avec des formules simples (pré-mélanges). Le pré-mélange m1 est composé de 10g de prémix et de 90g de farine de mil. Le pré-mélange m2 est composé de 20g de m1 auxquels l'on ajoute 80g de farine de mil. Ces dilutions successives permettent de diminuer la concentration de micronutriments dans le mélange final. Ainsi, le mélange m3 est constitué de 50g de m 2 et 4 950g de farine de mil. La farine fortifiée obtenue est alors pesée et conditionnée dans des sachets de 500g afin d'être stockée avant d'être vendue. partager les objectifs, les activités et les résultats de l'initiative avec une large communauté ; v) l'équipe technique d'AcSSA, pour l'appui technique, le conseil et l'accompagnement des bénéficiaires.L'initiative a donné lieu à plusieurs actions parmi lesquelles une visite d'échange à Niamey de quatre membres du groupement Wafakay dans l'unité de transformation de la farine fortifiée où a été lancée l'expérience ; la restitution des échanges aux autres membres du groupement et de l'union, et l'expression des besoins en équipements ; une rencontre entre les responsables de la collectivité de Téra, du centre de santé et des radios ; les achats et la mise en place des équipements et des matières premières ; la formation in situ des vingt femmes du groupement (techniques de transformation de la farine fortifiée, préparation de la bouillie, vie associative, gestion des unités de transformation et techniques marketings).Le groupement Wafakay a reçu une dotation initiale comprenant des produits bruts (3 t de mil et 3 kg de fortifiant), des équipements et matériels de travail (torréfacteur, farineuse, mélangeur, balance, thermosoudeuse, emballage, étiquette, marmites, Le succès de cette nouvelle farine se mesure par son utilisation par un grand nombre d'habitants de la commune de Téra et des alentours, aussi bien pour lutter contre la malnutrition que pour faciliter le sevrage des enfants.la mise en oeuvre du plan de développement communal comme stratégie de lutte contre la malnutrition et la pauvreté. Deuxièmement, un marketing adapté, avec une campagne de communication participative et inclusive. La diffusion d'émissions radios en langues locales (débats, interviews, témoignages, spots) en phase avec les préoccupations des populations, a contribué à l'appréciation de la farine enrichie locale nommée « Hamniya ».Ainsi, le groupement Wafakay, qui ne disposait au départ que de 50 000 FCFA en fonds propres, a pu augmenter son capital grâce à la vente de la farine fortifiée. Les femmes ont transformé 1000 kg de mil et ont obtenu 580 kg de farine fortifiée, vendue pour un montant total de 580 000 FCFA. 250 000 FCFA ont ensuite été prélevés afin de faire des crédits sans intérêts aux femmes du groupement, ces dernières travaillant sans rémunération. Plus généralement, l'initiative a permis d'améliorer le revenu de ces femmes et de réduire la malnutrition chez les enfants tout en valorisant des produits locaux (le mil, localement produit) et en mobilisant la population locale. Avant le projet DIAPOCO, les mères des enfants malnutris utilisaient des bouillies simples à base de céréales, et achetaient des produits industriels (tels que les produits Nutriset Plumpy'nut, lait F100 et F75) lorsque ceux-ci étaient disponibles, ce qui n'était pas toujours le cas. C'est de cette situation qu'est née l'idée de fabriquer sur place de la farine fortifiée à base de céréales locales. Aujourd'hui, le succès de cette nouvelle farine se mesure par son utilisation par un grand nombre d'habitants de la commune de Téra et des alentours, aussi bien pour lutter contre la malnutrition que pour faciliter le sevrage des enfants. L'équipe de recherche a d'abord travaillé à domestiquer les trois variétés de banane plantain sous serre puis, après avoir obtenu des résultats encourageants, a mené une évaluation en milieu réel pour s'assurer de leur adaptabilité. Pour ce faire, elle a adopté une démarche de recherche participative associant étroitement les chercheurs et les acteurs du monde rural et décomposée comme suit : i) identification participative de la thématique de recherche ; ii) apport de la technologie par la recherche ; ii) identification du site pour la démonstration en milieu réel et d'un(e) producteur(rice) ; iv) organisation d'une visite commentée couplée à une séance de dégustation regroupant l'ensemble des parties prenantes (chercheurs, partenaires techniques et O riginaire d'Asie du Sud-Est, le bananier plantain est cultivable dans les zones tropicales où les pluies peuvent atteindre 1100 mm d'eau par an. Dans la sous-région ouest-africaine, il est notamment produit en Côte d'Ivoire et au Ghana. Durant les trois dernières décennies, la consommation de la banane plantain, en provenance de ces deux pays, est entrée dans les habitudes alimentaires des Burkinabè, notamment ceux habitant dans les centres urbains. Elle est consommée sous forme de frites, chips, foutou, accompagnée de sauce ou simplement grillée.Les revenus générés par le commerce de la banane plantain sont très attrayants. Le prix de vente de la tonne de banane varie en effet entre 120 000 et 140 000 FCFA selon les périodes de l'année. Un camion chargé de bananes plantains génère autour de 1 500 000 FCFA de bénéfice à Ouagadougou (Bambio Z. François, 2015). Nonobstant les opportunités qu'offre cette filière, force est de constater qu'elle est peu développée au Burkina Faso, ce qui rend le pays fortement tributaire des importations. On enregistre d'ailleurs une nette progression de ces importations, ce qui témoigne d'une demande locale en hausse constante. Les quantités de bananes plantains importées sont passées de 1 146,1 t en 2008 à 5 084,6 t en 2013, soit une évolution de plus de 300 %.Pour répondre aux besoins de consommation des populations, réduire la dépendance du Burkina aux Pour répondre à une demande croissante et réduire le taux de dépendance des importations, le bananier plantain de Côte d'Ivoire a été introduit au Burkina Faso par le Programme de productivité agricole en Afrique de l'Ouest (PPAAO-Burkina) lors d'une expérience menée de novembre 2014 à décembre 2015, à Diarradougou. Avec des rendements atteignant 22 t/ha et un poids des régimes allant jusqu'à 17 kg, l'équipe scientifique estime que les résultats obtenus sont satisfaisants.Couverture Les objectifs de cette expérience sont de promouvoir l'adoption du bananier plantain et contribuer à l'amélioration de la sécurité alimentaire financiers, producteurs, transformateurs et consommateurs) pour partager les résultats de l'expérience ; v) mise en place du dispositif expérimental relaté dans le protocole de recherche.La zone retenue pour l'expérimentation fut l'ouest du Burkina, dans la région des Hauts-Bassins. Plus précisément, il s'agissait du périmètre maraîcher de Diarradougou, commune rurale situé à 20 km de Bobo Dioulasso, chef de lieu de ladite région, où règne des conditions agroécologiques et climatiques favorables (accès à une source d'eau pour l'irrigation et pluviométrie variant de 800 à 1100 mm) à cette culture.La productrice a été choisie parmi les membres du groupement des producteurs de la banane douce du périmètre. Ce choix s'est fait selon trois critères prédéfinis : accessibilité de la parcelle, existence d'un point d'eau pour l'irrigation, et engagement du bénéficiaire. Les plants pour la pépinière et un appui conseil technique lui ont été fournis tout au long de l'expérimentation.Le dispositif expérimental mis en place par l'équipe de recherche fut le suivant : i) des superficies exploitées de 0,9 ha pour PITA 3, 0,9 ha pour FHIA 21 et 1,25 ha pour Big ebanga ; ii) 25 t de fumure organique appliquées à l'hectare ; iii) 1 t d'engrais minéraux (NPK et urée) recommandée à l'hectare ; iv) deux passages pour l'irrigation par semaine jusqu'à la reprise de croissance des plants et des passages tous les 4 à 5 jours après la reprise de croissance des plants jusqu'à maturité.Les objectifs à moyen et à long terme de cette expérience sont de promouvoir l'adoption effective de cette nouvelle culture au Burkina, diversifier les productions agricoles et les sources de revenus, générer de nouveaux emplois au profit des acteurs du monde rural, et contribuer à l'amélioration de la sécurité alimentaire et à la qualité nutritionnelle des populations.En suivant fidèlement les différentes recommandations techniques des trois variétés, des résultats intéressants ont été constatés. Ainsi, le délai de floraison est de sept mois pour la variété PITA3 et huit mois pour les Il est possible -et rentable -de pratiquer la culture du bananier plantain au Burkina Faso.« Au départ, j'étais très sceptique, mais aujourd'hui je suis une femme heureuse au regard des résultats obtenus. Je suis très satisfaite et fière d'être un exemple pour mes camarades producteurs. J'ai appris beaucoup de choses de cette expérience, qui m'aideront même pour la production de la banane douce. Cela confirme l'adage \"Qui ne risque rien n'a rien\" ». Sylvie Kassongo, bénéficiaire de l'expérimentation de production de la banane plantain La conduite participative de l'expérimentation, l'implication de tous les acteurs (producteurs et chercheurs) tout au long du processus et la prise en compte de toutes les opinions ont permis de relever les défis rencontrés. La réussite de l'expérience doit aussi beaucoup au dévouement de la productrice bénéficiaire, à l'appui conseil technique assuré par l'équipe de l'INERA et à l'accompagnement des autorités administratives à travers l'appui financier du PPAAO. À l'instar des autres producteurs membres de son groupement, Saïdou a bénéficié d'une formation de cinq jours assurée au niveau local par la Direction provinciale du ministère de l'Agriculture et des aménagements hydrauliques ainsi que des formateurs endogènes. À l'issue de cette formation, il a reçu du matériel de production (marteau, pic axe, râteau, brouette, triangle à pente, gants, bottes, etc.) La rigueur est un des traits qui caractérisent le mieux Saïdou : il se fixe des objectifs et met tout en oeuvre pour les atteindre. Dès la fin de la formation, il a établi un calendrier et un plan d'action grâce auxquels il a pris de l'avance par rapport à ses camarades. Aux premières pluies, il avait déjà effectué ses semis. C'est que le producteur avait été convaincu par l'expérience de son père, bénéficiaire du projet avant lui. Grâce au renforcement de ses capacités, celui-ci avait aménagé deux parcelles, une de 1,5 ha en demi-lunes et une autre de 1 ha en zaï, sur des terres dénudées. Il avait alors récolté 70 charretées de sorgho sur la parcelle S itué dans la province du Kourwéogo, dans la région du Plateau-Central, le village de Roundé est caractérisé par la dégradation des ressources naturelles et l'abondance de terres abandonnées, impropres à la culture. Cette situation est une conséquence du changement climatique, qui se manifeste notamment par la sécheresse, l'insuffisance de pluies et parfois des inondations et des vents violents. Les producteurs procèdent donc à l'abattage des arbres alors même qu'il y en a de moins en moins, détruisant la flore de la région. Ceux qui n'ont pas la chance de disposer de terres vierges sont contraints de quitter le village à la recherche d'un mieux-être, ce qui contribue à le dépeupler, le privant ainsi de ses bras valides. En parallèle, les difficultés d'accès aux équipements et intrants agricoles ainsi qu'une faible connaissance des techniques de conservation des eaux et des sols entraînent une baisse considérable des productions céréalières et de la productibilité de l'élevage, ce qui expose les communautés à une insécurité alimentaire permanente.C'est pour résoudre ces difficultés que Solidar Suisse a lancé un projet de deux ans, de 2015 à 2016, visant à améliorer la sécurité alimentaire des populations pauvres et vulnérables de la région du Plateau-Central au Burkina Faso et à améliorer les conditions de vie des producteurs. Ce projet fait suite à une première phase, de 2013 à 2014, qui a enregistré des résultats forts La demi-lune est peu pratiquée par les producteurs en raison de la pénibilité du travail qu'elle nécessite. Fort heureusement, certains producteurs sont prêts à braver cette pénibilité pour se lancer dans la réalisation de cette technique qui présente de nombreux avantages. Saïdou Ouédraogo est de ceux-là. Cet habitant du village de Roundé, dans la commune de Niou au Burkina Faso, et membre d'un groupement de producteurs bénéficiaire du projet Sécurité alimentaire de Solidar Suisse, a réussi l'impossible : cultiver du riz, céréale très gourmande en eau, sur une terre jadis laissée à l'abandon.Couverture L'application de techniques de conservation des eaux et des sols procure aux bénéficiaires l'opportunité de varier leur production convaincu de l'efficacité de la technique de la demilune, il décide de cultiver du riz dans son village.Il réalise alors des demi-lunes sur une superficie totale de 88,3 m 2 de terres dénudées et fait une récolte prodigieuse de 233 kg qu'il se garde de vendre, réservant cette manne pour la consommation familiale. Il souhaite faire profiter ses proches des fruits de son exploit avant de les partager avec la population. Habituellement, la variété cultivée par Saïdou, le riz FKR 19, a un rendement de 5 à 6 t/ha avec un cycle de 115 jours. Le producteur a récolté la même quantité en seulement en 80 jours grâce aux demi-lunes, et uniquement avec de l'engrais organique. En 2016, il tenta à nouveau l'expérience, cette fois sur une superficie de 204,8 m 2 en utilisant de l'engrais chimique. Il récolta 700 kg de riz… Saïdou le téméraire entend aujourd'hui poursuivre l'aventure en se lançant prochainement dans la production d'igname, tubercule habituellement produit dans les zones humides. aménagée en demi-lunes et 40 charretées de la même spéculation sur celle aménagée en zaï. En comparaison, il n'avait récolté que 15 charretées sur son ancien champ de 2,5 ha, exploité en parallèle.Contrairement au sorgho, qui est une des plantes cultivées les moins exigeantes en eau, le riz est une céréale qui nécessite beaucoup d'eau. Il est de ce fait cultivé dans les zones marécageuses ou les bas-fonds. Parmi les trois provinces de la région du Plateau-Central, la province du Kourwéogo est la plus défavorisée en termes de qualité des sols et de répartition de la pluviométrie, et donc la moins propice à cette culture. Saïdou, qui a auparavant vécu dans un pays où la pluviométrie est abondante et maîtrise les techniques de la culture du riz, va toutefois réaliser l'impossible. Enhardi par l'expérience de son père, et Les savoirs locaux de nos parents, pour peu que l'on s'y intéresse, constituent une véritable richesse à exploiter en association avec les innovations agricoles. Les producteurs ont tendance à préférer les techniques de zaï au détriment des demi-lunes en raison de l'intensité de l'effort à fournir pour réaliser celles-ci. C'est donc en toute logique que la difficulté à convaincre ces derniers à pratiquer les demi-lunes (mais aussi la passibilité des acteurs du projet euxmêmes, notamment les associations de mise en oeuvre, face à cette situation) constitua le principal défi du Projet Sécurité Alimentaire de Solidar Suisse.Pourtant, les demi-lunes sont plus résistantes et durables dans le temps que les zaï (5 à 7 ans contre 3 ans). De plus, la quantité d'eau nécessaire aux demi-lunes est moins importante que pour les zaï (les semis dans les demi-lunes peuvent se faire avant l'installation définitive de la saison des pluies). Autre avantage intéressant, elles requièrent une superficie moins importance, ce qui contribue à résoudre le problème de plus en plus récurrent du foncier. Elles sont en outre efficaces pour récupérer les terres en glacis. Les demi-lunes conviennent donc aux terres dégradées, et présentent l'avantage, une fois qu'elles sont réalisées, de nécessiter moins de travail.L'application de cette technique de conservation des eaux et des sols procure aux bénéficiaires l'opportunité de varier leur production ; elle a permis à certains d'entre eux de pratiquer des cultures qu'ils n'auraient pas pu exploiter auparavant à cause de l'aridité des sols.L'intervention menée par Solidar Suisse a été innovante à plusieurs égards. Des voyages d'étude ont été organisés à l'intention des partenaires de mise en oeuvre pour leur permettre d'apprendre d'autres acteurs intervenant dans le même domaine. Les ressources internes de ces partenaires, ainsi que des agents de l'Etat au niveau local, ont été mis à contribution pour la formation des producteurs qui a aussi bénéficié de la contribution d'anciens bénéficiaires et producteurs modèles. Le fait que les différents participants soient familiers les uns avec les autres a permis de renforcer la confiance.Les résultats obtenus l'ont été grâce à la combinaison de plusieurs facteurs. D'abord, le projet a su apporter une réponse adéquate aux besoins des bénéficiaires. La rigueur que s'est imposée Saïdou dans l'exécution de son activité ainsi que l'adhésion et la motivation des différentes parties prenantes ont contribué pour beaucoup à la réussite de l'utilisation des demi-lunes. En outre, le recours aux savoirs locaux par les producteurs eux-mêmes (comme le décryptage des signes de la nature permettent de savoir s'il pleuvra suffisamment ou non) a amélioré la qualité des actions.L'expérience de Saïdou permet ainsi de tirer plusieurs leçons très utiles. La conviction est le premier facteur, et la rigueur personnelle une qualité indispensable, qui déterminent tous deux la réussite de l'utilisation de techniques complexes, comme les demi-lunes. En outre, les savoirs locaux de nos parents, pour peu que l'on s'y intéresse, constituent une véritable richesse à exploiter en association avec les innovations agricoles. I dentifiée par la Fédération des organisations des producteurs de banane du Mali comme une filière porteuse pour le développement économique national du pays, et dotée d'un fort potentiel de production (estimé à 35 000 t par an), la filière banane est pourtant sous-exploitée. En dépit de la position géographique favorable du Mali, différentes contraintes affectent sa production, notamment la non maîtrise des techniques appropriées. Or, la banane contribue à la sécurité alimentaire (elle représente une source substantielle de glucide) et constitue une opportunité socio-économique.L'une des préoccupations du Programme de productivité agricole en Afrique de l'Ouest (PPAAO-Mali), qui supporte la filière banane malienne depuis 2011-2012, est le développement et la diffusion de technologies en vue d'accroître la production agricole pour assurer la sécurité alimentaire et réduire la pauvreté. Aussi a-t-il initié, à l'intention des membres de la Fédération, une formation sur de nouvelles techniques de production visant à améliorer la productivité des bananerais et les revenus des producteurs. L'expérience a débuté dans le bassin de production à Koutiala (Sikasso) avant d'être étendue dans d'autres localités du cercle de Dioïla (Koulikoro).Le diagnostic effectué en 2010 par la Fédération sur la production de la banane au Mali, en particulier à Koutiala, a fait ressortir une diminution de la productivité des pieds de banane de 20 à 40 % de leur potentialité productive ces cinq dernières années due à un mode d'irrigation inapproprié, à l'apparition et au développement de la cercosporiose (une maladie de la souche de banane), et surtout à une méconnaissance de nouveaux itinéraires de production de la banane.Une formation sur ces nouveaux itinéraires a donc été mise place dans les zones de production avec pour objectifs i) d'accroître la productivité des pieds de banane en augmentant le poids des régimes des bannerais ; ii) de diminuer l'intensité de main d'oeuvre nécessaire dans les champs de banane ; iii) de permettre un développement végétatif normal du bannerais ; iv) de réduire les risques de cercosporiose ; v) et de permettre un bon murissement de la banane afin d'augmenter sa qualité organoleptique.La stratégie adoptée pour atteindre ces objectifs fut l'établissement d'un contrat de collaboration avec la Fédération des organisations des producteurs de la banane. Le chargé de la filière a dû suivre des formations en Côte d'Ivoire pour renforcer son expertise sur les nouveaux itinéraires de production.Pour améliorer la productivité des bananeraies et les revenus des producteurs de banane, la Fédération des organisations des producteurs de banane du Mali, en concertation avec le Programme de Productivité Agricole en Afrique de l'Ouest (PPAAO-Mali), a lancé un plan stratégique de développement de la filière consistant dans le renforcement des capacités de ses membres. C'est dans ce cadre que le PPAAO a initié un transfert de technologie dit « nouveaux itinéraires de production de la banane » dans le bassin de production à Koutiala (Sikasso).Couverture En plus de sa contribution à la sécurité alimentaire, la culture de la banane est un facteur de lutte contre l'exode rural et l'orpaillage en milieu rural devaient former à leur tour 80 producteurs dans les zones de production de la banane. Cette stratégie a permis de toucher un grand nombre de producteurs.L'évaluation technique menée par le Programme-Mali auprès des bénéficiaires dans le bassin de Koutiala a révélé plusieurs résultats positifs. Les 50 formateurs relais formés ont ainsi touché plus de 3 965 producteurs dans plusieurs villages. Le développement végétatif des plants de banane est désormais normal, et même excellent, ce qui permet au bananier d'arriver à maturité physiologique en huit ou neuf mois au lieu de douze mois. La combinaison des techniques (effeuillage, nettoyage, respect des écartements, etc.) a permis de passer à un rendement d'une tonne pour 25 régimes (contre moins d'une tonne pour 50 régimes auparavant). L'oeilletonnage, qui consiste à supprimer les rejets du bananier pour ne garder qu'un ou deux rejets par pieds-mère, a permis de réduire la quantité d'engrais à apporter aux plants de trois sacs à un sac et demi et d'augmenter le poids des régimes (70 régimes par t auparavant contre 30 régimes par t aujourd'hui). L'effeuillage, consistant à supprimer les feuilles mortes et celles du bas pour une meilleure aération de la bananeraie, a considérablement réduit l'infection par la cercosporiose et les grattages sur le fruit. La coupe de la fleur et la mise en place de tire-sève ont contribué à la maturité physiologique plus rapide du fruit. Le tuteurage, c'est à dire la mise en place d'une fourche de soutien afin d'empêcher les gros régimes de tomber au sol, a permis de réduire les pertes de bananes.Le nouvel itinéraire de production a permis de mettre en valeur 999 ha de surface supplémentaires.Les nouvelles techniques de production, importées de la Côte d'Ivoire, consistent à la destruction des rejets du bananier, l'effeuillage, la coupe des fleurs et la fertilisation. Elles ont été appliquées sur la banane Grande naine principalement cultivée au Mali. Cette variété a été choisie du fait de sa capacité d'adaptation aux conditions climatiques des zones de production et de son aptitude à se reproduire au champ par voie végétative (elle produit le matériel végétal, les rejets, nécessaire à la création de nouveaux plants).Pour bénéficier de cette intervention, les producteurs devaient posséder des parcelles de production et disposer d'équipements agricoles (motopompe et accessoires …), être capables de comprendre et d'appliquer les messages techniques et les conseils, se montrer motivés et disponibles. Une première séance de formation a concerné 50 formateurs relais qui La banane Grande naine a été choisie du fait de sa capacité d'adaptation aux conditions climatiques des zones de production et de son aptitude à se reproduire au champ par voie végétative.En vue d'assurer la durabilité du projet, la technique de production enseignée a été associée à la technique de plants issus de fragments de tige (PIF). Celle-ci répond au problème de vieillissement des bananeraies qui explique en partie les baisses de rendement enregistrées ces cinq dernières années et constitue un sérieux handicap pour le développement de la culture de la banane. C'est pourquoi la promotion de la technique PIF a été une innovation appréciable, accessible à tous les producteurs, même les plus petits, à moindre coût. Elle constitue une opportunité d'assurer la souveraineté semencière de la filière et de permettre une durabilité de la production de la banane au Mali.À travers les nouveaux itinéraires de production de la banane se dessinent les caractéristiques d'une nouvelle professionnalité de producteurs, et un ensemble de conditions qui définissent les traits d'une communauté apprenante et émergente dans la production de la banane au Mali. Cette communauté doit faire face à un certain nombre de défis :• Des difficultés de mobilisation de ressources financières pour amener un grand nombre de producteurs à la maitrise des nouvelles technologies de production de banane ;• L'insuffisance des mesures portant sur le renforcement de l'organisation des acteurs, la structuration de la filière, l'accès au financement, le développement des infrastructures adéquates pour une meilleure valorisation de la banane, les bonnes pratiques de gestion des eaux de surface, le développement du marché intérieur et l'amélioration de la qualité de la banane ;• De mauvaises conditions de stockage et de transport des bananes, qui contribuent pour beaucoup à l'altération de la qualité du fruit ;• La non sécurisation foncière, qui limite de plus en plus la culture de la banane aux environs des grandes villes, plus précisément dans le district de Bamako. Les terres se font rares du fait du développement de la ville et de la spéculation foncière qui atteint aujourd'hui même les villages éloignés ;• L'insuffisance de soutien matériel, financier et technique apporté aux femmes productrices de banane, celles-ci s'intéressant de plus en plus à la production de banane ;• L'insuffisance d'agents spécialisés dans le suiviaccompagnement des acteurs de la filière banane.En plus de sa contribution à la sécurité alimentaire, la culture de la banane est un facteur de lutte contre l'exode rural et l'orpaillage en milieu rural, car elle représente une formidable opportunité d'insertion socio-économique pour les jeunes. A u cours des campagnes 2011 et 2013, le déficit fourrager enregistré au Niger, de l'ordre de 16 471 000 t et 6 708 832 t de matière sèche, a fait perdre au cheptel nigérien environ 2 725 427 têtes de bétail, toute espèce confondue, soit 13,51 % de l'effectif total. Les espèces ovines, caprines et bovines ont été les plus affectées avec des proportions respectives de 37,48 %, 33,06 % et 27,14 % de cette perte. Pire, cette crise pastorale consubstantielle à la crise alimentaire a entrainé la décapitalisation du cheptel avec comme conséquence un bradage (vente à vil prix d'environ 1 435 202 têtes d'animaux) qui a fortement réduit les revenus des éleveurs et impacté négativement leurs conditions de vie. C'est dans ce contexte que l'idée de mise au point de la technologie du bloc multi-nutritionnel densifié, un aliment pour le bétail simple à élaborer à l'aide d'équipements et de produits locaux, a vu le jour au Niger.Sur financement du Programme de productivité agricole en Afrique de l'Ouest (PPAAO), des spécialistes d'alimentation et de nutrition animale de l'Institut national de la recherche agronomique du Niger (INRAN), des cadres des services publics de l'élevage et du Centre de développement de l'artisanat agricole et du machinisme rural (C-DARMA) ont La technologie de bloc multi-nutritionnel densifié pour le bétail (BMNDB) a été concrétisée grâce à un financement conjoint de l'Organisation des Nations unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture (FAO) et de l'État du Niger. Elle a été imaginée en réaction à la série de crises pastorales que le Niger a connu depuis son indépendance, en particulier celle de 2009-2010. La maîtrise de la fabrication du BMND est vivement souhaitée, car elle offre à la fois un moyen pour lutter contre l'insécurité alimentaire et pour améliorer les revenus des ménages.peut être préparé facilement dans les milieux ruraux et périurbains. Cela est d'autant plus intéressant qu'il n'y a aucun impact négatif majeur sur l'environnement : sa fabrication ne nécessite pas de coupe d'arbres et tout le fourrage utilisé est généralement réservé à l'alimentation des animaux. Cette innovation s'inscrit dans un contexte national où l'élevage intensif est pratiqué dans presque tous les ménages et où la demande en BMND est forte.La série d'images ci-dessus montre les différentes étapes de la fabrication du BMND. On voit d'abord des sacs contenant les matières à broyer, puis des prototypes de broyeur de tiges et des sacs contenant les tiges broyées. Le processus se poursuit avec le malaxage de tiges broyées avec les autres sousproduits agroindustriels, les minéraux, les liants et les vitamines. C'est surtout à partir de cette étape que commence la formation à la technique de fabrication du bloc qui conduit à la confection des briquettes ainsi étiquetées. La dernière image montre un test d'appétibilité du BMND mené sur des caprins.Les éléments cités ci-haut montrent que l'expérience est une réussite, mais aussi qu'elle a vocation à s'inscrire dans le temps, plusieurs facteurs militant pour la durabilité de la technologie de bloc multinutritionnel densifié pour le bétail au Niger. Tout d'abord, les sessions de formation sur la mise au point de cette innovation se poursuivent dans toutes les régions du pays. Ensuite, elle s'inscrit dans un contexte national où l'élevage intensif est pratiqué dans presque tous les ménages et où la demande en BMND est forte. En outre, le projet a bénéficié dès le départ d'un important soutien politique. Les unités de fabrication du broyeur sont toutes locales ; elles sont implantées dans quatre régions du Niger. Les ressources nécessaires à la fabrication du BMND sont elles aussi disponibles localement. Enfin, le BMND est et demeure respectueux de l'environnement avec un impact négatif très mineur. L'opération, qui visait au départ les éleveurs et associations d'éleveurs, a suscité l'intérêt des instituts de recherche et d'enseignement, des ONG et des services de vulgarisation, aussi bien au niveau national que sous-régional. Initiative des pouvoirs publics, lancée en réponse au déficit fourrager qui a causé la crise pastorale, le BMND constitue un moyen pour lutter contre l'insécurité alimentaire mais devient également une véritable activité génératrice de revenus et créatrice d'emploi, notamment pour une certaine catégorie de la population (les femmes et enfants ramasseurs de tiges).Hamidou Souley est responsable de suivi et évaluation du projet. hamsouleymane@yahoo.fr Les travaux de recherche d'un projet commissionné sur la « Mise au point des blocs multi nutritionnels densifiés de productions à base des ressources alimentaires locales » ont abouti à la mise au point de cinq formules dans l'embouche ovine. Les béliers nourris avec trois de ces formules ont réalisé les meilleures performances de croissance pondérale avec un gain de poids moyen de 83 g sur une période de 75 jours.Si ces résultats sont encourageants, le processus de fabrication du BMND ne se fait pas sans difficulté. Des pannes du broyeur, qui peuvent durer plusieurs jours, voire des semaines, surviennent fréquemment. À la demande des utilisateurs, les unités de fabrication du broyeur ont donc envisagé la création de points de vente de pièces de rechange au niveau des chefs-lieux de communes où sont installés ces broyeurs. En outre, le coût relativement élevé du broyeur (de 350 000 à 500 000 FCFA l'unité) par rapport au revenu moyen des producteurs et éleveurs rend son acquisition difficile. Seuls les gros opérateurs y ont facilement accès. Pour les autres, une mutualisation des efforts est nécessaire. À ce titre, les unités de fabrication ont imaginé l'évolution de la version thermique (qui a un coût de fonctionnement élevé) vers une version solaire, avec un coût d'entretien presque nul. Soulignons également la difficile conservation sur le long terme du BMND, qui peut être attaqué par les moisissures. Le sous-projet commissionné du PPAAO sur le BMND doit proposer des formules résistantes à cette moisissure. L es banques de céréales permettent aux ménages ruraux d'acheter ou de vendre des produits alimentaires à un prix inférieur à celui pratiqué par les commerçants pendant la période de soudure ou en cas de mauvaise campagne agricole. Dans la région Nord du Burkina Faso, où intervient la coopérative Viimbaore/Naam, les banques de céréales ont été développées par la Fédération nationale des groupements Naam à la suite des grandes sécheresses des années 1970-1980 pour lutter contre l'insécurité alimentaire. Cependant, malgré le rôle capital qu'elles jouent pour répondre aux enjeux de la sécurité alimentaire des populations, elles ont été confrontées à d'importantes difficultés de financement, de gestion et de gouvernance, ce qui a conduit à la fermeture de nombreuses d'entre elles faute de stock suffisant.Dans l'optique d'améliorer l'approvisionnement et d'éviter les ruptures de stock, SOS Faim, avec le soutien du Fond belge pour la sécurité alimentaire, a apporté son appui au réseau de banques de céréales pour une meilleure structuration et la mise en place d'un système de financement durable des stocks de produits. Ainsi, les banques de céréales, qui prennent désormais l'appellation « Grenier de sécurité alimentaire (GSA) », ont-elles été dotées d'un fonds de roulement centralisé. Celui-ci permet d'octroyer chaque année aux GSA, initiés par des groupements à la base et appartenant à tout le village, des avances (crédits) de fonds pour la constitution et la diversification de stocks alimentaires de proximité. Un taux de 7 % est appliqué afin de couvrir une partie des coûts de fonctionnement et de maintenir le capital.Fortement dépendant de conditions agroclimatiques aléatoires, le bilan céréalier dans la zone d'intervention de la coopérative Viimbaore/Naam est dans une situation permanente de déficit. De ce fait, la couverture des besoins alimentaires des ménages reste non satisfaite et dépend des marchés céréaliers des zones excédentaires. Cela favorise les fluctuations de prix et rend difficile l'accès des ménages les plus vulnérables aux céréales. Ainsi, le fonds de roulement mis en place par la coopérative a pour objectif de faciliter les activités d'approvisionnement et de commercialisation des produits alimentaires de base des GSA dans une perspective de financement durable et autonome à travers la responsabilisation des acteurs. Il permet aux GSA de se procurer des stocks de denrées qu'ils peuvent vendre aux populations tout au long de l'année et accroît la visibilité de la coopérative et l'efficacité de ses interventions dans la lutte contre l'insécurité alimentaire.Les systèmes de stockage alimentaire de proximité jouent un rôle primordial dans la sécurité alimentaire des populations des pays du Sahel. Les banques de céréales permettent aux ménages ruraux d'accéder aux denrées de base pour couvrir leurs besoins, surtout en périodes de soudure et de mauvaise campagne agricole. Cependant, elles ont été confrontées à de nombreuses difficultés qui ont limité leur efficacité et entrainé la fermeture de certaines d'entre elles. C'est la raison pour laquelle des méthodes de financement durable et autonome ont été envisagées, à l'image du fonds de roulement adopté notamment par la coopérative Viimbaore/ Naam dont l'expérience est relatée dans ce document.s'engage à mettre en place un dispositif de collecte/ recouvrement du fonds et à affecter un animateur pour le suivi des activités du GSA. Le GSA doit en outre disposer d'une infrastructure et des équipements adéquats de stockage ou avoir la capacité d'en louer. Il utilise exclusivement le fonds de roulement pour approvisionner le stock et diversifier les produits alimentaires, et dispose d'un organe de gestion composé de quatre membres dont trois femmes. Il sursoit à la vente à crédit et promeut plutôt leur vente au détail, surtout aux ménages vulnérables.L'octroi du fonds de roulement est soumis à l'examen de la demande, défendue par les responsables du GSA, par un comité d'octroi qui statue et donne l'accord de financement. Cet accord permet à la coopérative de procéder au transfert du montant accordé sur le compte bancaire du GSA dans les 72 heures.Un dispositif de suivi à différents niveaux permet le contrôle de l'utilisation effective du fonds pour les approvisionnements des GSA en produits vivriers. Enfin, pour la gestion transparente et pérenne du fonds, plusieurs acteurs sont impliqués dans le processus. Il s'agit :• des unions Naam porteuses de la demande de fonds de roulement pour les GSA de leur ressort territorial ;• des groupements abritant les greniers de sécurité alimentaire ;• des comités de gestion (Coges) chargés de la gestion quotidienne du grenier ;• du comité d'octroi, qui statue sur les demandes de fonds de roulement ;• du comité de recouvrement, qui appuie les Coges dans le recouvrement des fonds par les GSA ;• du Conseil d'administration de la coopérative ;• de l'équipe d'appui technique de la coopérative ;• des institutions de microfinance que sont les Baoré tradition d'épargne et de crédit (BTEC) et le Réseau des caisses populaires du Burkina (RCP) abritant les comptes des greniers de sécurité alimentaire ;• D'ECOBANK, qui abrite le compte fonds de roulement central.L'adoption du fonds de roulement central a permis l'atteinte de résultats satisfaisants à divers niveaux de réalisation de la coopérative. Elle a également permis de renforcer significativement les capacités financières des GSA.Avant la mise en place du fonds de roulement, le système de financement consistait à des subventions ponctuelles ou à des dotations en stocks gérées de façon à reconstituer de nouveaux stocks. Certaines dotations étaient renforcées par les productions issues des champs collectifs. Ce système comportait des limites dont les nombreuses ruptures de stocks enregistrées par les banques, la mauvaise gestion (stock vendu à crédit, détournements, inadéquation aux besoins de la population, etc.) et l'offre limitée des produits. Au regard de ces difficultés, et de l'offre limitée sur les marchés, les banques de céréales n'arrivaient pas toujours à assurer la sécurité alimentaire des populations ou à faire face aux chocs et crises alimentaires récurrents dans la zone. Le fonds de roulement permet ainsi aux GSA de contribuer à réguler les marchés vivriers et de renforcer le pouvoir de négociation des producteurs et consommateurs ruraux face aux commerçants.Pour ce faire, il est octroyé chaque année suivant les conditions et critères suivants. Le GSA ne doit pas être redevable de crédits souscrits pour les campagnes antérieures. Il doit procéder au remboursement du crédit en fin de campagne (après 11,5 mois) en une seule fois ou en trois échéances réparties sur l'année. Toutefois, pour un fonctionnement optimal du fonds, la coopérative doit révéler plusieurs défis dont l'accroissement du taux de consommation du fonds par les GSA, la définition d'une stratégie de motivation des membres des comités de gestion (qui s'investissent dans les activités des GSA sans aucune contrepartie) et la conciliation des missions sociales et des objectifs économiques des GSA et de la coopérative. En d'autres termes, les GSA doivent poursuivre leurs missions d'appui des populations pour l'accès aux produits alimentaires à prix réduit tout en parvenant à produire de petites marges bénéficiaires afin d'assurer leur autonomie financière.Les GSA bénéficient de la forte implication des femmes dans leur gestion d'une part (les comités de gestion sont quasiment exclusivement composés de femmes, qui se sont avérées être de bonnes gestionnaires des fonds de roulement reçus) et de la participation de la population locale à toutes les étapes (choix des produits, prix de vente, suivi du stock, etc.) d'autre part. La solidarité, l'entente, l'entraide, la cohésion sociale et la non-discrimination entre les acteurs font que tous bénéficient du fonds de roulement centralisé et travaillent au remboursement intégral des crédits. La capacité d'assurer les charges de fonctionnement à hauteur de 50 % par les fonds propres mobilisés indique que les acteurs partagent un esprit de durabilité du système.En outre, la démarche est transparente, avec l'instauration d'un contrat dont les clauses sont lues publiquement et connues par le maximum de personnes de la communauté bénéficiaire et la tenue publique des assemblées générales de bilan de campagne.L'adéquation du dispositif à la situation et aux besoins du public cible a aussi contribué à sa réussite. On peut citer la mise en place d'outils de gestion simples et adaptés aux acteurs et aux activités, l'existence d'un cycle de financement élaboré en fonction du cycle de production agricole, et l'octroi progressif du fonds de roulement aux GSA selon leurs capacités et le respect des engagements antérieurs.Soulignons enfin l'importance de la contribution des animateurs des unions, qui jouent le rôle d'interface entre les unions, les groupements, les GSA et l'équipe technique de la coopérative ; des communes, qui participent au suivi des financements et aident à la légalisation des documents contractuels ; de la gendarmerie et de la police, qui interviennent en cas de retard de remboursement et aident au recouvrement des créances impayées.À la lumière des résultats obtenus dans le cadre de l'expérience de la coopérative Viimbaore/Naam, on peut ainsi conclure que l'existence et la mise en place d'outils de gestion simples et adaptés, ainsi que l'instauration d'une culture de redevabilité, permettent une bonne gestion du financement d'un système de stockage de proximité susceptible de contribuer efficacement à l'atteinte de la sécurité alimentaire.Estelle Traore est responsable opérationnelle chargée de l'accompagnement de la coopérative Viimbaore/Naam. estelle_traore@yahoo.fr C'est pour cette raison que la FEPA-B, composée à 52 % de femmes, met oeuvre depuis 2001 un programme spécifique qui prend en compte les besoins de ce groupe. Ce programme comporte quatre volets : i) l'autonomie financière de la femme rurale ; ii) sa participation à la prise de décisions ; iii) l'allègement des tâches des femmes rurales ; iv) l'accès aux facteurs de production.La première composante du programme de la FEPA-B, l'autonomie financière de la femme rurale, vise à faciliter l'accès des femmes aux crédits à travers la mise en place d'un fonds de garantie auprès d'une institution de microfinance. Dans cette optique, la FEPA-B, avec l'appui de ses partenaires, a établi une alliance avec la Fédération des caisses populaires du L es femmes représentent 51,7 % de la population du Burkina Faso. 78 % d'entre elles, soit 5 655 451 de femmes, vivent en milieu rural. Elles réalisent plus de 60 % des activités de production et sont présentes dans tous les secteurs d'activités, participant ainsi à l'économie nationale. Il est reconnu que l'accès des femmes aux financements favorise l'accroissement de leur pouvoir d'achat et leur contribution au soutien de la famille, à l'éducation et à la santé de leurs enfants. Plus généralement, donner un pouvoir financier à la femme augmente le pouvoir financier de la nation dans son ensemble.Pourtant, le financement des activités économiques des femmes rurales (petit commerce, embouche, stockage et commercialisation de produits agricoles, culture maraîchère, transformation des produits locaux, etc.) constitue aujourd'hui encore un défi majeur. En effet, du fait de leur vulnérabilité et de la faiblesse de leurs revenus, ces femmes ont un faible accès au financement car elles ne remplissent pas les conditions pour obtenir un crédit auprès des institutions de microfinance. Très peu disposent de garanties traditionnelles, telles que des titres fonciers ou des permis urbains d'habiter. Cette absence de garanties les prive de crédits, pourtant indispensables pour lancer et mener à bien leurs activités.Elles subissent par ailleurs les pesanteurs socioculturelles. Les hommes n'acceptent pas que leurs Un fonds de garantie, créé par la Fédération des professionnels agricoles du Burkina (FEPA-B) au sein d'une institution de microfinance, permet désormais aux femmes rurales d'accéder à des crédits adaptés à leurs activités à des conditions négociées. À travers cet accompagnement, la FEPA-B contribue à l'autonomisation financière de la femme burkinabè et à l'amélioration de ses conditions de vie. Cette approche, mise en place à partir de 2010 par l'Union provinciale des professionnels agricoles du Houet (UPPAH) dans le cadre du « Programme femme », a permis à 779 femmes de bénéficier de crédits pour un montant total de 79,4 millions FCFA au cours de l'année 2016-2017.Burkina (FCPB). Ainsi, un protocole d'accord a été négocié et signé en 2001 pour une période de trois ans renouvelable. À travers ce protocole d'accord, un fonds de garantie permet aux femmes rurales membres des groupements villageois féminins de la FEPA-B d'accéder aux crédits à des conditions négociées.Le fonds de garantie couvre les femmes bénéficiaires pour une durée de trois ans durant laquelle elles peuvent constituer leurs fonds propres. En cas d'impayés, la caisse ayant accordé le crédit peut puiser dans le fonds de garantie à hauteur de 50 % du solde restant dû. Cette approche innovante, adaptée aux conditions socio-économiques des femmes rurales, poursuit un triple objectif : pallier le manque de garanties nécessaires pour accéder au crédit, faciliter l'accès des femmes rurales au crédit grâce à un allègement des modalités et des conditions ainsi qu'un raccourcissement des délais de traitement des dossiers, et leur permettre de constituer progressivement un fonds propre afin de poursuivre leurs activités sans crédit, ou peu, après les trois ans de couverture du fonds de garantie La FEPA-B fournit d'abord à l'institution de microfinance une liste des différents groupements ayant fait l'objet d'une étude diagnostique avec toutes les informations nécessaires (date de création, nombre de membres, activités principales, capacité de gestion, etc.). Dans un premier temps, des actions de sensibilisation, d'information et de formation sont entreprises auprès de ces groupements pour renforcer leurs capacités et connaissances en matière de gestion de crédit. Après cette étape préparatoire, les femmes formulent, avec l'appui des animatrices endogènes et des responsables des unions, leur demande de crédit adressée aux responsables des caisses de crédit de leur localité. Les demandes précisent l'activité envisagée, le montant sollicité et l'échéancier de remboursement. Elles sont analysées par la caisse qui s'assure de la faisabilité du projet avant de mettre en place le crédit. Les femmes qui obtiennent ainsi du crédit bénéficient également de formation sur la gestion du crédit.Au cours de l'année 2017, cette expérience a permis à 779 femmes issues de 32 groupements féminins de bénéficier de crédits pour un montant total de 79 400 000 FCFA. En termes d'épargne, elles ont pu mobiliser la somme de 18,697 millions FCFA et constituer un fonds de groupe de 2,273 millions FCFA. Les 779 bénéficiaires ont par ailleurs vu leurs compétences et connaissances dans le domaine de la gestion des activités économiques et du crédit renforcées.Les principales intéressées affirment que la création du fonds de garantie les a soulagées. Elles accèdent (surtout les plus pauvres) à des petits crédits plus facilement. Les affectations des bénéfices acquis sont multiples. Les femmes déclarent en utiliser une partie pour les besoins de la famille (alimentation, santé, éducation et habillement des enfants, etc.), leurs besoins propres (achats de pagnes, bijoux, chaussures, argent de poche, etc.), ou la solidarité sociale (participation aux mariages, décès, baptêmes, ou contribution aux besoins de prêt de parents et amis).76 % des femmes parviennent à réinvestir une partie des bénéfices dans leur activité et dans l'épargne.Pour assurer la durabilité de l'expérience, des séances de concertations des différents acteurs impliqués dans le processus devront être organisées régulièrement. Des actions de sensibilisation, d'information sur le processus d'octroi du crédit et de formation (à la gestion du crédit et de l'épargne, à la gestion des activités économiques) des bénéficiaires seront toujours nécessaires pour une plus grande réussite de la facilitation d'accès au crédit. Le suivi permanent des femmes bénéficiaires par les animatrices endogènes, ainsi que la mise en place d'outils simples et efficaces, contribuent à une meilleure gestion de leurs activités.En définitive, nous avons vu que la facilitation de l'accès des femmes rurales au crédit permet un épanouissement socio-économique de ces dernières. Au delà, cela conduit également à l'émergence de femmes leader au sein des groupes, des femmes qui gagnent en confiance, sont plus sûres d'elles et participent activement au développement de leur localité.Haoua Kone-Barry est chargée de programme, responsable de l'accompagnement et du suivi des initiatives économiques des organisations de femmes pour le compte de la FEPA-B. konehaoua3@gmail.com 76 % des femmes parviennent à réinvestir une partie des bénéfices dans leur activité et dans l'épargne. Elles se montrent déterminées à employer le crédit dans l'intérêt de la famille et à le rembourser dans le but de pouvoir en obtenir un autre. Jusqu'à présent, aucun retard n'a d'ailleurs été constaté dans le remboursement des prêts contractés. Cela prouve d'une part le sérieux des femmes dans l'exercice de leurs activités, et d'autre part l'adéquation du programme à des besoins réels.De manière générale, la facilitation de l'accès au crédit à travers le fonds de garantie a eu des impacts visibles sur la situation et les conditions de vie des femmes rurales qui se sont améliorées grâce aux revenus issus des diverses activités économiques entreprises suite à l'octroi de financements. Ces femmes ont gagné en confiance et sont devenues plus indépendantes.Le développement d'alliances et de synergies avec le Réseau des caisses populaires du Burkina (RCPB) dans une optique d'intérêts et d'avantages mutuels est un des facteurs de succès les plus importants pour l'accès des femmes rurales au crédit. La forte implication de l'Union départementale appuyée par l'Union provinciale du Houet dans le choix, l'encadrement et le suivi des bénéficiaires est également crucial. L'engagement des autorités locales (chef de village, délégué du village) ainsi que des acteurs de la FCPB et de ses démembrements dans les différentes zones (unions provinciales et départementales) contribuent fortement au bon recouvrement des crédits. Soulignons également l'importance des animatrices endogènes, chargées de l'accompagnement des femmes dans leurs activités économiques et du suivi du crédit, et du comité de suivi des crédits à l'UPPAH. La mise en place de caisses de microfinance en général, et le développement de crédits avec éducation en particulier a pour finalité d'améliorer l'accès des populations au financement de proximité. Pour atteindre cet objectif, le projet AD2M a d'abord cherché à densifier les caisses de microfinance en s'appuyant sur un partenariat avec la seule institution de microfinance présente dans la zone : le réseau CECAM (Caisse d'épargne et de crédits agricoles mutuels). Compte tenu des conditions défavorables à la mise en place de microfinance dans les régions Menabe et Melaky (enclavement, faible densité de population, fort taux d'analphabétisme, pauvreté et insécurité rurale), tous les spécialistes prédisaient l'échec de toute tentative allant dans ce sens.Des appuis à l'installation des caisses ont été fournis à l'institution de microfinance avec la construction de Depuis 2010, à Madagascar, le projet d'Appui au développement du Menabe et du Melaky (AD2M) soutient le développement d'un réseau de microfinance dans le but de faciliter l'accès aux services financiers des populations vulnérables. Dans une démarche de finance inclusive, le projet a mis en place un crédit innovant, le Crédit avec éducation (CAE), adapté aux besoins spécifiques des femmes. Le crédit, testé dans deux caisses à partir de 2012, est vite devenu le crédit le plus sûr avec un taux de remboursement de 100 % à l'échéance témoignant ainsi de la viabilité d'une telle initiative.A u sud-ouest de Madagascar, dans les régions Menabe et Melaky où intervient le projet d'Appui au développement du Menabe et du Melaky (AD2M), l'accès au financement formel est très faible. Cette vaste zone de 20 000 km², qui comprend deux régions, sept districts et 19 communes rurales, ne compte qu'une seule caisse de microfinance. En outre, les conditions d'octroi des crédits, qui nécessitent des garanties, excluent la frange la plus vulnérable de la population d'un éventuel financement par cette unique caisse.Or, le besoin en services financiers est réel. Les exploitations agricoles, de type familial, affichent une superficie moyenne de 1 ha pour un ménage de six personnes et une faible productivité. Elles disposent d'une faible capacité d'épargne et ont un taux d'endettement souvent très élevé. Les petits producteurs les plus vulnérables sont aussi ceux qui commercialisent les volumes les plus réduits et qui ont, avant la récolte, des besoins de trésorerie relativement élevés. De ce fait, ils n'ont d'autre choix que de recourir aux services des usuriers, qui pratiquent des taux d'intérêt dépassant 100 %, ou de vendre une partie, voire la totalité, de leur production « sur pied » avant la récolte à des prêteurs informels à des prix deux à trois fois plus bas que le prix payé après la récolte. Ce type de transactions maintient les producteurs dans une forte précarité et entraîne une spirale sans fin d'endettement et de paupérisation.bâtiments, l'équipement en matériels roulants (moto), informatiques et mobiliers de bureau, et la formation du personnel, notamment les animatrices. Le projet a aussi subventionné les pertes d'exploitation de la microfinance durant quatre ans, sachant qu'elle ne pourrait être rentable qu'au bout d'un certain temps d'exploitation. Ceci s'est fait de façon dégressive : 100 % des pertes en année 1, 75 % en année 2, 50 % en année 3 et 25 % en année 4. Le projet a aussi doté les caisses d'un fonds de 150 millions MGA pour l'octroi des premiers crédits aux bénéficiaires.Toutefois, les personnes vulnérables, notamment les mères célibataires, très nombreuses dans la zone, restaient exclues d'un tel dispositif car la microfinance exige des garanties matérielles pour obtenir un crédit. Or la plupart de ces personnes ne possèdent pas d'actifs, une situation aggravée par l'insécurité rurale (vol de bovidés) qui sévit depuis ces dernières années puisque le bétail constitue la principale garantie des ménages. Le CAE a donc été conçu et développé par la microfinance en 2012, sous l'impulsion du projet AD2M, afin de permettre à cette frange de la population d'accéder au financement.Contrairement aux services traditionnels, ce crédit n'exige pas de garantie matérielle. Les bénéficiaires, uniquement des femmes regroupées au sein d'associations de crédits solidaires (ACS), se cautionnent mutuellement pour rembourser les crédits qui restent toutefois individuels. La formation du groupe et le choix des membres sont libres, sans aucune intervention extérieure. Des animatrices dédiées au suivi des ACS sont recrutées et formées par l'institution de microfinance.Les crédits, qui concernent principalement des activités génératrices de revenus à rotation rapide, sont octroyés pour une durée de trois mois avec un taux d'intérêt de 24 %. Après remboursement du premier crédit, que l'on appelle « cycle de crédit », le groupe a droit à un deuxième cycle de trois mois, et ce jusqu'à neuf cycles de crédit. Le montant octroyé, qui est très modeste au départ, augmente avec le cycle, passant de 40 000 MGA par personne en premier cycle à 1,5 million MGA par personne en neuvième cycle de crédit. Le remboursement se fait mensuellement, mais étant donné le caractère de retour de fonds rapide des activités, des provisions hebdomadaires sont constituées au niveau du groupe afin que le recouvrement ne pèse pas trop sur la trésorerie en fin de mois. Après le neuvième cycle de crédit, les bénéficiaires intègrent la microfinance classique.Des formations sont dispensées aux bénéficiaires du CAE, afin de leur permettre de bien gérer le crédit octroyé (gestion de la trésorerie, compte d'exploitation), mais également soutenir leur épanouissement (sensibilisation à l'hygiène alimentaire, planning familial, prévention du VIH, etc.).Le mobile banking est utilisé par les caisses où il y a une couverture téléphonique afin de faciliter et surtout sécuriser les transactions. Cette technologie innovante, qui permet de consulter le solde, payer les échéances de crédit et retirer de l'argent via son téléphone portable, n'est encore qu'au stade pilote dans certaines caisses mais les résultats obtenus sont encourageants. Suite à la mise en place de caisses de microfinance, une amélioration notable de l'accès des populations rurales des régions Menabe et Melaky aux services financiers de proximité a été observée entre 2010 et 2017. Durant cette période, 3 500 personnes ont pu intégrer le système de microfinance. Si la zone d'action du projet ne comptait qu'une seule caisse au démarrage, 10 communes sur les 19 sont actuellement couvertes après l'extension dans le Melaky en 2013. Le nombre d'adhérents de ces caisses a presque triplé, passant de 1 330 en 2010 à 3 500 en 2017, dont 1 500 femmes. Le taux de participation aux activités de microfinance a aussi augmenté, passant de 20 % à 71 %.Une culture de crédit s'est ainsi installée petit à petit. Le montant de crédit octroyé annuellement dans la zone a plus que doublé, passant de 610 millions MGA en 2010 à 1,4 milliard MGA en 2017, avec un octroi cumulé de 8 milliards MGA pour près de 5 000 dossiers de crédit durant cette période. Le montant moyen octroyé par dossier de crédit est de 1,6 million MGA, soit 13 % supérieur à l'ensemble de CECAM des régions.Une étude menée en 2015 a également fait ressortir que le recours à la finance informelle, en particulier l'usure, a notablement diminué, passant de 10 % à 2 %.Une étude d'évaluation d'impact menée en 2015 montre que le revenu moyen annuel des ménages emprunteurs de crédits CECAM est 1,6 fois supérieur à ceux des non bénéficiaires.diversification aux soupes et repas, ceux-ci passent à 30 000 MGA par jour, » se félicite-t-elle. Et le remboursement du crédit ne lui pose aucun problème. Elle fait d'ailleurs très attention à cela car les mauvais payeurs sont bannis du groupe et elle se doit de donner l'exemple en tant que présidente. Avec l'augmentation du montant de crédits consentis au fur et à mesure de l'évolution du cycle, auquel s'ajoutent les bénéfices de son commerce au chantier, elle a pu ouvrir une épicerie au village. Vitorine ne compte pas s'arrêter là : « Actuellement en sixième cycle, je peux louer des rizières et je compte, à la fin du neuvième cycle, acquérir une parcelle rizicole ou des bovins. » La mise en place des caisses de microfinance et du crédit CAE constitue une véritable innovation. Cette expérience montre clairement que l'on peut mettre en oeuvre une finance rurale « inclusive » pour offrir des services financiers de proximité spécifiques aux ménages les plus vulnérables, même dans des zones difficiles, leur permettant de sortir de la pauvreté et d'améliorer leurs conditions de vie.La réussite du projet doit beaucoup aux appuis conséquents octroyés à l'institution de microfinance, aussi bien les investissements « structurants », que les activités de développement agricole menées par le projet (qui ont créé une dynamique économique plus favorable à la microfinance) ou l'encadrement de proximité des bénéficiaires par l'intermédiaire des animatrices.Toutefois, dans le cadre d'un futur partenariat de mise en place d'une telle initiative, il est nécessaire d'impliquer davantage les institutions de microfinance pour qu'elles se positionnent davantage comme « porteurs de projets ». Les fonds de crédits, qui constituent en quelque sorte le fonds de roulement des institutions de microfinance, pourraient par exemple être supportés en totalité par ces dernières. S elon les chiffres avancés par le programme FORMAPROD, 300 000 jeunes arrivent sur le marché de l'emploi chaque année à Madagascar, qui ne parvient pas à satisfaire cette importante demande. La plupart des jeunes au chômage rejoignent alors la campagne, non pas parce qu'ils veulent s'y installer mais parce qu'ils n'ont pas d'autre choix. Sans qualifications, ils deviennent exploitants sans pouvoir espérer obtenir davantage que de médiocres rendements. Cela explique le fait qu'avec plus de 80 % d'agriculteurs, la Grande Île n'arrive pas à nourrir sa population et soit contrainte d'importer des denrées alimentaires de toutes sortes.Face à cette situation alarmante, le gouvernement de Madagascar a initié des programmes de développement oeuvrant à la formation et l'installation des jeunes ruraux. Avec une zone d'intervention couvrant treize régions et 86 millions $ de financement, FORMAPROD est l'un des plus importants du pays. Placé sous tutelle du ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'élevage, ce programme a démarré en 2013 pour une durée de 10 ans et vise notamment à former aux métiers agricoles, accompagner et installer 100 000 jeunes qualifiés. Le processus d'insertion professionnelle de ces jeunes se résume en ces étapes : le recrutement, l'orientation, les formations proprement dites et l'accompagnement à l'installation (ou la mise en oeuvre des projets professionnels). C'est cette dernière étape qui nous intéresse ici. À l'issue de sa formation, le jeune a deux options : soit il attend l'arrivée d'un kit de démarrage pour commencer son projet professionnel, soit il démarre tout de suite son activité avec ses propres moyens. C'est ce que l'on appelle « l'installation par autofinancement », et c'est la voie que le jeune Dimby a choisi de suivre.Former les jeunes, les doter des matériels et intrants nécessaires au lancement de leur activité, et les accompagner dans l'exécution de leur projet professionnel font partie du processus d'insertion professionnelle. Il s'agit de leur offrir un métier pouvant leur procurer des revenus stables tout en contribuant à l'augmentation de la productivité agricole à Madagascar. Les formations sont confiées aux centres et établissements de formation ou aux consultants formateurs, sinon aux professionnels du métier (tuteurs). Quant à la dotation des kits d'installation, c'est une structure dénommée Fonds de développement agricole (FDA) qui s'en charge. L'installation des jeunes après leur formation représente un enjeu à l'aune duquel est mesurée la réussite du processus d'insertion professionnelle. En effet, pour évaluer les résultats du programme, il En juillet 2017, Dimby, un jeune père de famille de 29 ans, a suivi une formation technique en porciculture auprès du Centre de formation professionnelle de Bevalala. Au lieu d'attendre l'arrivée du kit d'installation fourni dans le cadre du programme FORMAPROD, il a décidé d'acheter les quatre porcelets nécessaires au lancement de sa ferme d'élevage avec ses propres fonds, ce qui lui a permis de démarrer son activité seulement un mois après sa formation. Cette expérience réussie d'installation par autofinancement nous permet de tirer plusieurs enseignements utiles pour l'atteinte des objectifs du programme FORMAPROD.Dimby fait du salariat agricole tout en étant exploitant, tandis que sa femme est vendeuse de pain et de fruits au marché local. Il a suivi une formation de douze jours en porciculture auprès d'un Centre de formation à Bevalala, en juillet 2017. Sans attendre l'arrivée du kit (porcelets et alimentation des porcins), il a immédiatement lancé sa ferme d'élevage sur les conseils du Conseiller en insertion professionnelle (CIP) qui l'a recruté et orienté. Il a acheté quatre porcelets avec l'argent que lui et sa femme avaient mis de côté et les a engraissé en suivant les techniques acquises lors de la formation. Il fabrique lui-même alimentation de ses animaux à partir de produits agricoles.Nombreux sont les résultats positifs de l'expérience menée par Dimby dans le cadre du programme FORMAPROD, mais nous nous limiteront aux plus significatifs. Premièrement, grâce à l'autofinancement, l'installation de Dimby dans le monde professionnel et le secteur agricole a été très rapide et relativement facile. Il a démarré son activité seulement un mois après la fin de la formation alors que les autres, dans l'expectative du kit, ont attendu de six mois à un an. Il n'a perdu ni de temps ni les connaissances acquises car il a immédiatement mis en pratique tout ce qu'il avait appris lors de sa formation.À l'heure où j'écris ces lignes, Dimby possède une petite ferme d'élevage porcin qui tourne bien et dont il s'occupe avec attention. Ses animaux sont en bonne santé et bien nourris. Les quatre porcs acquis atteindront les 100 kg dans sept à neuf mois et le jeune homme pourra alors tirer des bénéfices de leur vente, lui permettant d'étendre son exploitation progressivement (augmentation du cheptel et agrandissement du parc). « J'évalue ces bénéfices à environ 400 000 MGA (soit 125 $) par tête. Si j'arrivais à vendre chaque tête à 1 million MGA (312 $), j'obtiendrais convient de prendre en compte non pas le nombre de jeunes formés, mais le nombre de jeunes installés.Normalement, après la formation, chaque jeune élabore un projet professionnel et reçoit un kit d'installation (ou de démarrage) en fonction de l'activité qu'il a choisie. Cependant, des facteurs indépendants du programme peuvent retarder l'arrivée de ces kits, certains jeunes attendant une année entière avant de les recevoir. Cette situation est un facteur de démotivation pour les bénéficiaires du programme au point que certains décident d'abandonner leur projet professionnel (on estime qu'environ 5 % des jeunes se désistent et changent d'orientation à cause de ces retards). Or, un jeune qui se désiste, c'est un investissement perdu. Pire encore, les déçus sont susceptibles de diffuser des informations discréditant le programme, véhiculant l'idée que celui-ci ne tient pas ses promesses et engagements, ce qui rendrait les futures activités de sensibilisation difficiles. Faute de solution, l'équipe du Programme s'est contentée de recommander au FDA d'alléger autant que faire se peut les procédures d'octroi et d'activer les dotations. Mais cela s'avère compliqué à cause de l'étendue de la zone d'intervention concernée.C'est pour remédier à ce problème que l'équipe du programme FORMAPROD a encouragé le jeune Dimby à expérimenter l'autofinancement de son activité. Il ne s'agissait pas de l'inciter à renoncer définitivement au kit promis, mais de le convaincre de lancer son projet professionnel avec ses propres moyens.Grâce à l'autofinancement, l'installation de Dimby dans le monde professionnel et le secteur agricole a été très rapide et relativement facile.1,6 million MGA (soit 500 $) de bénéfices, » a-t-il affirmé. Surtout, Dimby exerce un métier qu'il aime.Deuxièmement, en utilisant ses fonds propres, Dimby n'a pas de dettes à rembourser, contrairement à la plupart des jeunes qui ont eu recours au crédit et remboursent leurs créanciers après le premier cycle. Pour lui et sa famille, l'élevage porcin ne peut apporter qu'un surplus de revenus, et donc des améliorations dans leurs conditions de vie. À travers son métier, le jeune homme contribue également à l'augmentation de la production animale globale de sa région.L'autofinancement d'un projet professionnel nécessite toutefois de relever un certain nombre de défis. Tout d'abord, en utilisant ses économies comme fonds de démarrage, Dimby a pris de gros risques ; il sait qu'il n'a pas droit à l'erreur et qu'il est dans l'obligation de réussir pour ne pas décevoir les siens. Il est vulnérable à la survenance de certains évènements, comme une peste porcine qui pourrait décimer son cheptel.Si une telle catastrophe n'est heureusement pas arrivée, l'autofinancement de l'installation de Dimby a entraîné un déséquilibre dans le budget du ménage, dont une grande partie a été dédiée à la nourriture des porcelets en raison de la cherté des produits alimentaires utilisés au détriment des besoins de la famille qui a dû « se serrer la ceinture ». Le fonds disponible pour le petit commerce de la femme de Dimby a aussi été impacté. Il a donc été très difficile de trouver un compromis permettant d'élever les porcs comme il se doit sans négliger les besoins vitaux du couple.Par ailleurs, quand il a démarré son activité, le jeune Dimby ne s'attendait pas à ce que la disponibilité des intrants pour l'alimentation des porcins soit aussi limitée dans la zone et les dépenses associées aussi élevées. En effet, il a dû faire face à la flambée du prix du riz à Madagascar durant l'année 2017. Quand le prix du riz, à la base de l'alimentation des malgaches, augmente, tout le reste suit. Aussi bien les produits dérivés du riz, que les autres céréales comme le maïs, ou les tubercules comme le manioc et la patate douce, principales matières premières pour l'alimentation de porcin. Ces produits deviennent rares, et donc chers. Il a donc fallu rationnaliser l'alimentation des animaux,pour mettre en oeuvre une activité initiée dans le cadre d'un programme de développement. Dans la plupart des cas, les bénéficiaires attendent ce qu'on leur a promis avant de se lancer. Le fait que Dimby ait consenti à s'autofinancer témoigne -et garantitd'un engagement fort vis-à-vis de son futur métier.Si l'exploit de Dimby a été mal interprété par certains jeunes, qui y ont vu le signe d'un favoritisme de FORMAPROD ou, pire, ont pensé que les kits promis avaient été détournés, il en a inspiré beaucoup d'autres, qui essaient aujourd'hui de lui emboîter le pas. « Je suis d'avis que l'on peut toujours débuter avec le peu qu'on a ; il n'est pas forcément nécessaire d'attendre le kit pour démarrer. Deux ou trois porcelets peuvent suffire pour lancer une petite ferme d'élevage porcin, » affirme ainsi Saturnin, un jeune éleveur de porcs dans l'Est de Madagascar.Divers paramètres ont contribué à la réussite de l'expérience de Dimby. Premièrement, un meilleur ciblage et une meilleure orientation de la part du Conseiller en insertion professionnelle, qui a su détecter un jeune très motivé et assurer un bon suivi et accompagnement de proximité. Deuxièmement, le fait que la ferme de Dimby soit implantée à Mangamila Anjozorobe, une zone favorable à l'agriculture, ce qui lui a permis de subvenir aux besoins alimentaires de ses animaux malgré la pénurie de denrées agricoles et la flambée des prix. Troisièmement, le fait que Dimby et sa femme aient déjà de petites activités rémunératrices (le salariat agricole, pour Dimby), ce qui leur a permis de mettre de l'argent de côté et de mobiliser ce fonds pour la ferme. L'implication de la femme de Dimby et les soutiens psychologiques de ses parents ont également été très importants.La mise à l'échelle de cette expérience faciliterait l'atteinte du principal résultat attendu du programme FORMAPROD (100 000 jeunes ruraux installés en 10 ans). Pour que la pratique de l'autofinancement soit effectivement suivie par un plus grand nombre de jeunes, quelques mesures méritent toutefois d'être prises une mauvaise gestion dans ce domaine conduisant à une perte assurée. L'approvisionnement en produits vétérinaires est aussi très difficile dans la zone d'installation de Dimby ; il faut faire une centaine de kilomètres de route pour en trouver. Conserver ces produits, en particulier les vaccins, demande des équipements et des compétences spécifiques. Or, il est impératif que les animaux soient vaccinés et soignés en cas de maladie. Dimby et les autres éleveurs ont donc décidé de se rassembler et d'envoyer un représentant afin qu'il effectue des achats groupés.Pour surmonter chacune de ces difficultés, le jeune éleveur a bénéficié d'un accompagnement de proximité, ce qui l'a beaucoup rassuré. Son conseiller en insertion professionnelle a dû rompre avec ses habitudes pour lui rendre visite plus souvent afin de l'encourager et l'aider à bien gérer et protéger son exploitation.Dimby n'est bien sûr pas le seul jeune de sa zone installé dans le monde professionnel depuis la mise en oeuvre du programme. Pourtant, rare sont ceux à y être parvenus (ou même à s'y être essayés) si rapidement après leur formation et la démarche adoptée ici relève de l'innovation aussi bien de la part du Conseiller en insertion professionnelle que du bénéficiaire lui-même. D'une part, inciter un jeune formé dans le cadre du programme à autofinancer son activité est à la fois osé et difficile, de la part d'un CIP. D'habitude, on lui recommande d'attendre le kit de démarrage ou d'emprunter de l'argent auprès d'une institution de microfinance. Cela provoque, on l'a vu, des risques de démotivation et d'endettement. Le conseiller de Dimby a choisi d'adopter cette attitude dans le but d'accélérer son installation et d'atteindre plus rapidement l'objectif du Programme FORMAPROD. D'autre part, il n'est pas fréquent de trouver un bénéficiaire qui ose mobiliser ses économies Les jeunes qui ont recours à l'autofinancement s'investissent davantage dans ce qu'ils entreprennent que les autres.par les responsables concernés. En premier lieu, il faudrait standardiser le processus d'installation de tous les jeunes formés à Madagascar. Cela ne pourrait se faire qu'au niveau du Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Elevage, qui ordonnerait aux projets ou programmes sous sa tutelle de se conformer à un processus d'insertion professionnelle standard. Il s'agirait par exemple de poser comme condition d'octroi d'un kit le démarrage de son activité par ses propres moyens, sauf pour la production nécessitant un investissement important comme l'élevage de vache laitière.Il faudrait également mettre en place des structures pérennes capables d'assurer l'accompagnement de proximité des jeunes après la formation, car l'équipe du programme n'est pas mobilisable indéfiniment. La constitution d'une association de formateurs ou tuteurs professionnels dans la région Amoron'i Mania en est un parfait exemple. En définitive, l'expérience très intéressante de Dimby nous permet de tirer plusieurs enseignements.Les deux premières étapes du processus d'insertion professionnelle des jeunes, la sensibilisation et l'orientation professionnelle, sont cruciales et nécessitent un important travail de la part de CIP compétents. La réussite du processus dans son ensemble dépend de la façon dont ceux-ci auront conduit ces deux phases.Des jeunes véritablement intéressés par une activité professionnelle et suffisamment motivés feront tout pour réussir leur installation. Ils seront plus enclins à démarrer leur activité avec ce qu'ils ont pour les développer progressivement. Il est donc important de distinguer ces jeunes des opportunistes, qui ont tendance à se décourager à la moindre difficulté. Les caisses de crédit de l'Union nationale des mutuelles d'investissement et de crédit oasien et des zones pluviales (UNMICO) s'adressent à tous les producteurs vivant dans les villages de leur zone d'intervention. Chacun peut devenir adhérent, à condition d'être capable de mener une activité génératrice de revenus et de souscrire une part sociale d'adhésion. Les adhérents de la caisse se réunissent ensuite en assemblée générale constitutive pour désigner les organes de gestion. Les caisses de crédit de l'UNMICO constituent un réel outil de développement autogéré. Chaque caisse créée devient une entité autonome, constituée par les sociétaires vivants dans une zone délimitée, favorisant ainsi la pleine participation des bénéficiaires à tout le processus de mise en place et d'appropriation.M algré l'existence de 18 banques commerciales, le secteur financier mauritanien a du mal à répondre aux besoins financiers du pays. Centré exclusivement sur le milieu urbain et périurbain, il exclut une grande partie de la population, notamment rurale. Or, le manque de ressources financières de cette population a toujours été une contrainte majeure pour optimiser la production. Si, ces dernières décennies, le Gouvernement a lancé plusieurs projets et programmes pour résoudre la problématique du financement agricole, ces différentes initiat ives n'ont donné que des résultats assez mitigés. En effet, elles ne couvraient qu'une partie très limitée des filières agricoles et ne prenaient pas en considération les petits agriculteurs et éleveurs ruraux qui constituent près de 60 % de la population vivant principalement des activités agricoles. En outre, les procédures d'octroi de crédit des institutions financières n'étaient pas adaptées aux besoins et conditions de vie de ce groupe vulnérable exclu du système bancaire classique.C'est ce qui a amené la Mauritanie, en étroite collaboration avec le Fonds international de développement agricole (FIDA) et l'Organisation des Nations unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture (FAO), à appuyer l'émergence d'institutions financières décentralisées. La mise sur pied de caisses de L'économie rurale mauritanienne est basée sur l'agriculture et l'élevage. Un diagnostic participatif a fait ressortir un fort besoin de financement de proximité autogéré, adapté à la situation et aux besoins des petits agriculteurs et éleveurs ruraux. C'est ainsi que furent créées les Mutuelles d'investissement et de crédit oasien (MICO) et les Caisses d'épargne et de crédit agricole (CECA), dont l'objectif est l'octroi de financements portant notamment sur les campagnes agricoles, l'alimentation du bétail, les activités génératrices de revenus et l'autoconsommation en période de soudure. Les caisses ont été lancées en 1998, avec la création d'une première caisse pilote, puis étendues à l'échelle nationale. On en compte aujourd'hui 54, reparties sur l'ensemble du territoire national.Cette démarche a conduit à une certaine homogénéité sociale et a favorisé des relations de confiance, nouées entre les membres, ainsi qu'une connaissance approfondie de ces derniers et de leurs besoins de financement. Grâce au nombre de bénéficiaires relativement réduit, la qualité des emprunteurs et leurs activités sont appréciées plus facilement. Les caisses ont également permis l'obtention de crédits avec des formalités adaptées et un plus grand contrôle des activités de recouvrement à des coûts réduits, ainsi que l'adoption de procédures simples permettant un dénouement de l'ensemble des opérations au niveau local et leur maîtrise par un nombre élevé d'élus potentiels.L'objectif principal de ces caisses de crédit est d'apporter de façon durable des services financiers de proximité adaptés aux besoins des populations vulnérables, notamment rurales, pour financer localement toutes les activités viables. Le choix des activités éligibles est basé sur des critères objectifs, pertinents, adaptés et approuvés participativement par les bénéficiaires dans l'optique, notamment, de lutter contre l'usure.Ces caisses sont organisées de manière uniforme conformément au modèle mutualiste : au sommet du pouvoir, on trouve l'assemblée générale qui élit les membres du conseil d'administration, du comité de crédit, du conseil de surveillance et modifie le statut et le règlement intérieur. Le conseil d'administration est chargé de la gestion administrative et financière de la caisse. Le comité de crédit est chargé des études des demandes de crédit, l'octroi de crédit et l'accompagnement de proximité des bénéficiaires sur la gestion administrative, comptable et financière des projets financés. Le conseil de surveillance est chargé du contrôle interne du fonctionnement de la caisse.Les procédures de crédit varient d'une caisse à une autre suivant leurs spécificités. À titre d'exemple, certaines caisses conditionnent l'accès au crédit à la plantation d'un arbre pour lutter contre la sècheresse en contribuant à la fixation des dunes de sable préservant ainsi l'environnement. Les caisses ont une durée de vie de 99 ans renouvelable.Ces caisses se situent dans un processus durable de pérennisation et d'appropriation des mécanismes par les populations rurales pour un développement local endogène. Elles ont permis aux petits agriculteurs ruraux d'accéder plus facilement aux services financiers, suivant des procédures adaptées à leur situation. Les adhérents reçoivent des dividendes à la fin de l'exercice financier annuel. Les caisses ont conduit à une augmentation de la production agricole ainsi qu'à une amélioration des revenus des ménages et de la qualité de l'habitat. Une telle démarche a également eu pour effet la consolidation et la création d'activités génératrices de revenus, particulièrement féminines, l'autonomisation des femmes et des jeunes en matière d'organisation, de gestion et de prise de décision, mais aussi la fixation des populations rurales, contribuant ainsi à lutter contre l'exode rural. Au 31 décembre 2017, elles avaient octroyé plus de 50 000 crédits pour un montant cumulé de 7,78 milliards d'ouguiyas dont 61,4 % destinés à l'agriculture (maraîchage, phoeniciculture, cultures pluviales et autres cultures sous-palmiers), 12,2 % à l'élevage, 11 % à l'artisanat, 10,3 % au petit commerce et 5,1 % à l'autoconsommation.Ainsi, les caisses de crédit de l'UNMICO sont devenues un modèle de bonne pratique se caractérisant essentiellement par leur grande adaptabilité au milieu rural et leur adéquation avec les principes de la finance islamique.Les caisses ont été marquées par une certaine instabilité liée à la situation matrimoniale des jeunes femmes élues dans les instances dirigeantes. En effet, après leur mariage, celles-ci ont tendance à quitter la localité avec leurs époux laissant ainsi leur position vacante. Il faut alors recommencer à zéro le renforcement des capacités de nouveaux élus.Il était par ailleurs difficile de mobiliser les femmes pour les formations d'une durée de plus d'une semaine en dehors du village. Généralement, les organes de gestion des caisses sont administrés par des hommes. L'étendue du territoire national, plus de 1 million km 2 , n'a pas facilité le suivi et l'encadrement des caisses.En outre, les populations de la zone couverte par les caisses éprouvent de réelles difficultés à assurer leurs remboursements en cas de mauvaises récoltes consécutives à l'irrégularité des pluies ou autres calamités telles que le péril acridien.Pour faire face à ces difficultés, des séances de formation pratique et sur le tas relatives à la bonne gestion, à l'organisation, aux rôles et responsabilités des organes de gestion et à la réglementation ont été organisées au profit des membres des instances dirigeantes. Beaucoup des séances de sensibilisation et d'information ont également été réalisées au profit des hommes et notabilités sur le genre. La responsabilisation des adhérents et leur appropriation de la démarche ont donc été des facteurs clé dans la réussite des caisses autogérées. Le concept est adapté au contexte rural mauritanien, ce qui permet une mobilisation de l'épargne locale destinée à financer les crédits appropriés aux conditions spécifiques des bénéficiaires. Les caisses sont également en phase avec les prescriptions religieuses. Enfin, le taux de capitalisation élevé renforce la stabilité financière des caisses répondant ainsi aux besoins des sociétaires.Sid'Ahmed Bessid est directeur général de l'UNMICO. Il est spécialisé en microfinance en milieu rural. dg@unmico.netLa durabilité d'un projet dépend largement du degré de participation des bénéficiaires à sa conception, sa mise en oeuvre, son fonctionnement et son évaluation. Une forte participation de la population (à la gestion, aux assemblées générales, etc.) témoigne d'un niveau élevé d'appropriation du mécanisme. On constate également que les projets qui marchent correctement sont ceux initiés par les populations elles-mêmes, sans influence extérieure. Ainsi, la viabilité d'un projet nécessite-t-elle que l'on ne considère pas uniquement les populations cibles comme des bénéficiaires, mais aussi comme des responsables chargés de l'élaboration, de l'organisation et de la gestion dudit projet. Le sentiment d'être des participants actifs réellement responsables et engagés est plus fort chez les populations dans le cadre de l'approche dite « à la demande » que lorsqu'il s'agit de projets dont la mise en oeuvre a été décidée hors de leur communauté. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3621378384.json b/main/part_2/3621378384.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..78f8c0f444c0eb1c70507f0e7b5581843c5c72e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3621378384.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"4258fe89-6d2c-47d3-af37-555f3ad370a7","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3646999283.json b/main/part_2/3646999283.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2bec3c870429b8d0e87a01b83decd087fe5510a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3646999283.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f6991323deadeb946790dd85900ca132","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2a2847ea-9fd1-4356-be2d-a6aed67e04fe/retrieve","id":"1127010302"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"58b9baa1-a3af-4678-b4a7-e83d6a7b5787","content":"After the games were played, a significantly higher proportion of communities adopted water registers and rules to govern groundwater, compared to other communities in the same NGO water commons program. Because groundwater levels are affected by many factors, games alone will not end groundwater depletion. However, games can contribute to social learning about the role of crop choice and collective action, to motivate behavior change toward more sustainable groundwater extraction.Contributing CRPs/Platforms:• WLE -Water, Land and Ecosystems • PIM -Policies, Institutions, and Markets Contributing Flagships:• F3: Sustaining Rural-Urban Linkages (RUL) Contributing Regional programs: Contributing external partners:• FES -Foundation for Ecological Security Groundwater is one of the most challenging common pool resources to govern, resulting in resource depletion in many areas. We present an innovative use of collective action games to not only measure propensity for cooperation, but to improve local understanding of groundwater interrelationships and stimulate collective governance of groundwater, based on a pilot study in Andhra Pradesh, India. The games simulate crop choice and consequences for the aquifer. These were followed by a community debriefing, which provided an entry point for discussing the interconnectedness of groundwater use, to affect mental models about groundwater. A slightly modified game was played in the same communities, one year later. Our study finds communication within the game increased the likelihood of groups reaching sustainable extraction levels in the second year of play, but not the first. Individual payments to participants based on how they played in the game had no effect on crop choice. Either repeated experience with the games or the revised structure of the game evoked more cooperation in the second year, outweighing other factors influencing behavior, such as education, gender, and trust index scores. After the games were played, a significantly higher proportion of communities adopted water registers and rules to govern groundwater, compared to other communities in the same NGO water commons program. Because groundwater levels are affected by many factors, games alone will not end groundwater depletion. However, games can contribute to social learning about the role of crop choice and collective action, to motivate behavior change toward more sustainable groundwater extraction.Quantification: "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3655952383.json b/main/part_2/3655952383.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d294ee54202f369635ec6f63c25308013daf6c71 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3655952383.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c3a8d0b30389b8a1d98c2b0ff33af9e4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/51078548-88cb-4088-b1b7-63c891acd304/retrieve","id":"1251012451"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3d21b261-ba86-4572-a77a-aa54919e7447","content":"The CGIAR (hereafter referred to as DCL) requested an analysis of the principal commodities of their proposed program and the farming systems in which they are found. The 12 priority crops of the Dryland Cereals and Legumes Agri-Food System research program are chickpea, common bean, cowpea, faba bean, groundnut, lentil, pigeon pea, soybean, barley, pearl millet, small millet and sorghum (DCL, 2015). The research builds on a global classification of farming systems, on maps of the spatial distribution of all 12 DCL crop commodities, on socioeconomic data on population, poverty, malnutrition, on market access, and on soil and climatic data.ABSTRACT -Dryland cereal and legume crops have often received less attention than maize, wheat and rice in terms of research and development priorities. But these crops are important globally because they serve populations living in poverty and particular socioeconomic and environmental niches. Compared to other crops, less is known about the global distribution of dryland cereal and legume crops and the conditions where they are grown. This research reports on an international effort to compile geographic information on cereal and legume crops and the conditions under which they are cultivated.. The study suggested that dryland cereal and legume crops should be given priority in 18 farming systems worldwide, representing 160 million ha. The priority regions include the drier areas of South Asia, West and East Africa, Middle East and North Africa, Central America and other parts of Asia. These regions are prone to drought and heat stress, among other biotic and abiotic constraints. They represent 60% of the global poor and malnourished and make up half of the global population.generated based on pixel level data (Hyman et al., 2008). Spatial overlay was used to organize the data into spatial units according to farming system and combinations of farming systems and country. The result of the overlay procedure is a set of database files (dBase format) organized by farming system region and combination of farming system region and country. The process facilitated an analysis of DCL crops in 18 farming systems where these crops are concentrated.• DCL crops should be given priority in 18 farming systems worldwide where they cover 160 million ha. • These dryland system areas are home to the majority of the world's poor and food insecure. The study examines The analysis and resulting database providesWhere these crops occur in the context of constraints and opportunities for their developmentHow can DCL technologies be geographically targeted for reducing poverty and malnutrition?•The spatial extents of key con-straints to DCL crop production, using the most recent spatial data availableThe first global farming systems information resource for specifically evaluating priorities for DCL crop improvement and management"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3661505877.json b/main/part_2/3661505877.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b144f4367892001c03751abef873fdbb8f2b5a4e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3661505877.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5337cde5da64843a5bf43139e31c1fb5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3b3f2eb4-5309-4964-9d86-a9f58c80b0b7/retrieve","id":"-1257596680"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6d6a45a0-6d2f-4f0c-81d0-d5188d4b4148","content":"Introduction ALTHOUGH cassava's role as a major African staple and household food security crop is generally acknowledged (Jones 1959, Cock 1985), few details are known about the combination of factors which determine chan,es in cassava supply. Even basic questions, such as whether reliance on cassava is increasing or decreasing remain unanswered (De Bruijn and Fresco 1989). Major factors which influence cassava production and consumption are the ecology, human population density and the market infrastructure (Carter and Jones 1989).This paper deals with ecolopcal determinants of cassava supply: climate and more particularly soils.Cassava plant growth is oplimal in warm humid climates with deep fertile soils, but the crop is known to tolerate considerably less favorable conditions (Cock 1985).10 many areas, cassava can still be cultivated even after considerable land degradation has taken place. The objective of this paper is to show to what extent current cassava distribution coincides with suboptimal ecological conditions.Africa is mapped into regions which may be regarded as homogeneous with respect to the ecological requirements of the cassava crop--so called agro-ecological zones, at a scale of I : 10,000,000. Previous attempCs to do SO, in particular in the FAO Agro-ecological Zones Project for Africa (FAO 1978), included only a few specific conditions for cassava and produced a classification of physical suitability. but not a description of agro-ecological zones .The mappin, is carried out in two steps: (a) zonation based on temperature and rainfall, and (b) zonation based on soils and topography. The resulting map is compared to actual cassava distribution as derived from (Carter and Jones 1989) for Nieeria and Ghana.Climate. The climatic classification system for cassava elaborated by Carter (1987), needs modification to deal adequately with the level of detail required in the sub-Saharan region. Preference is, therefore, given to the Papadakh climatic map, which is also included in the soil map of the world (Papadakis 1970) . The use of sinille value maps for rainfall and temperature will result in a fragmented division thai does nol correspond directly to larlle geographical units. Some degree of generalization is therefore necessary to maximize the level of ddail as well as its readability and usefulness. Table I illustrates the structure of the Papadakis classifications as applied to cassava.Cassava is well adapted to a wide range of climates . Optimal conditions are temperatures of 25°C to 29°C and at least 1000 mm of well distributed rainfall. Below 10°C the irowth of cassava will stop, but the crop survives light frost. At temperatures above 29°C the yield will diminish. This paper uses an annual average temperature of 20°C as the lower critical limit. Cassava is occasionally found at high altitudes, but the crop is not widespread above 1500 m. For mappini purposes, and in order to avoid the fragmentation of zones, the limit of 1100 m is used. This limit encompasses the great majority of cassava-growing regions, with exception of the higher altitude zones in East Africa. Critical lower rainfall values for cassava vary widely, and the crop appears able to survive occasional annual rainfall condilioDS of less than 500 mm. For the purpose of this paper, the lower limit of 150 mm suggested by Cock (1985) bas been converted to 900 mm in order to allow for adequate mapping_ Soils. The optimal soil for cassava can be described as well drained , Iigbt textured, deep and fertile. Cassava tolerates almost all textural classes, although very heavy soils reduce yield and apparently require more labor to harvest. Sandy soils are more likely to be less moisture retentive and less fertile. Cassava is tolerant of low fertility levels, low P content, high AI conteDt and low pH. Poor drainage and salinity can cause serious problems .The approximately 5000 units contained in detail (scale 1 : 5 million) in the FAO/ UNESCO (1961) soil map of the world are used as a starting point. Units that are considered unsuitable with respect to climate and soil are excluded (e.g., desert areas or areas with saline soils).Soils are classified into five groups in a declining Drder of suitability for growing cassava (table 2).Group I soils are the most favorable to cassava cultivation; group 2 soils exhibit certain textural restrictiDOS (e.g., aerosols) and lower fertility (e.g., ferralsols); group 3 soils are similar to group 2, but the unfavorable soils are more concentrated. The restrictions in the soils of group 4 are so serious that these soils are unsuitable for cassava. Since these soils are unsuitable, no phases are added, to avoid further subdivision of the units.Group 5 contains all soils with salinity problems, which are for that reason totally unsuitable. As restrictions by phases occur in some cases, these are compensated by adding phases to the code representing a restriction: 't' represents textural restrictions, . i ' for lithic or stoniness , 'p o for petrie and/or petroferric phases.When phases are added the soil group does not correspond anymore with the suitability class. Groupiog the original 5000 units of the FAO/UNESCO soils map results in a total of 415 units in the final map, which is presented on a scale of I : 10,000,000. -.. line -oodic -ooJonchakJ and IOJonctzThe map shows the combined climatic and soils mappini for cassava in Africa. Each of the mappini units defines an agro-ecological zone where similar climate and soil conditions occur. For example H2t in the map refers to humid tropical climate, moderately suitable land, textural restrictions phase (see legend to map). In most of western Africa. cassava cannot be grown north of the latitude 15° N as a result of the desert and mediterranean climate. Suitability increases marginally moving southward until the highly suitable Gulf of Guinea climate is reached. At the same latitude in the Hom of Africa. the climate is dominated by highland and desert conditions. East Africa is extremely varied in climate owing to the marked difference in altitude. The central Congo basin has a humid and hot equatorial climate and is. therefore, highly suitable for cassava. All of southern Africa, except for the coastal strip of Mozambique is dominated by a colder climate unsuitable for cassava. The coastal strip of Mozambique is warmer and better watered than its plains, and is therefore very suitable. Madagascar is very heterogeneous with very suitable areas at the west and east coasts. The southern part of Africa and the Kenyan highlands are dominated by climates not suitable for cassava.With respect to soil zones the African continent is very heterogeneous, although some general patterns can be distinguished. As expected. the geographical distribution of the saline and alkaline soils is restricted to the dry areas of Africa. Just south of the Sahara, Arenosols are dominant (soil group 2). Further south to the Gulf of Guinea, groups 2, 3, and 4 are present. The tropical lowlands are dominated by Ferrasols (soil group 2) and Yermosols (soil group 4).In Nigeria and Ghana, cassava is present in ecologically suboptimal zones. In Nigeria, cassava is where there are areas of very high population density . In Ghana, cassava is concentrated in zone Al (acound Kumasi) and in zone 53 (around Accra). In northern Ghana (zone S3p), however, cassava is rarely grown in the humid southwest areas. This situation in Nigeria and Ghana is confirmed for the rest of Africa; a cursory look at a distribution map (Cacter and Jones 1989) suggests that most cassava is found outside the most suitable climate-soil units.This paper has briefly described the African soil zones with respect to cassava production. The optimal conditions for cassava production ace very similar to those of other crops, and because cassava tolerates marginal condiiions, cassava cultivation bas no comparative advantage in the most suitable areas (De Bruijn and Fresco 1989). Comparison between cassava growing environments and actual cassava distribution in Nigeria and Ghana demonstrates that the distribution of cassava could be primarily a function of population density rather than of agro-ecological conditions. This suggests that cassava grows under suboptimal conditions where traditional soil fenility restoration through fallowing bas deteriorated."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3663243085.json b/main/part_2/3663243085.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5d5c45615ff2a986d847105410c2800df0c908f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3663243085.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4c126bb6ed81767c3f9aa04b2e6aeb86","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9ef0808e-e531-4fce-9e3a-469350be7562/retrieve","id":"1212301380"},"keywords":["Global livestock sector","Livestock production systems","Market chains","Environmental effects","Climate change","Management","Sustainable use"],"sieverID":"c658527c-4fc0-438c-8e22-c5d93c8a38ac","content":"This overview analyses the key drivers of change in the global livestock sector and assesses how they are influencing current trends and future prospects in the world's diverse livestock production systems and market chains; and what are their consequent impacts on the management of animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. The trends are occurring in both developing and industrialized countries, but the responses are different. In the developing world, the trends are affecting the ability of livestock to contribute to improving livelihoods and reducing poverty as well as the use of natural resources. In the industrialized world, the narrowing animal genetic resource base in industrial livestock production systems raises the need to maintain a broader range of animal genetic resources to be able to deal with future uncertainties, such as climate change and zoonotic diseases.This chapter discusses: • What are the global drivers of change for livestock systems? Economic development and globalization; changing market demands and the \"livestock revolution\"; environmental impacts including climate change; and science and technology trends. • How are the livestock production systems responding to the global drivers of change? Trends in the three main livestock production systems (industrial, crop-livestock and pastoral systems); the range and rate of changes occurring in different systems and how these affect animal genetic resources. The implications are that breeds cannot adapt in time to meet new circumstances. Hence new strategies and interventions are necessary to improve the management of animal genetic resources in situations where these genetic resources are most at risk.• What are the implications for animal genetic resources diversity and for future prospects of their use? -Industrial livestock production systems are expected to have a limited demand for biodiversity, while crop-livestock and pastoral systems will rely on biodiversity to produce genotypes of improved productivity under changing environmental and socioeconomic conditions. All systems will rely on biodiversity, albeit to varying degrees, to cope with expected climate change. • What immediate steps are possible to improve animal genetic resources characterization, use and conservation? Appropriate institutional and policy frameworks are required to improve animal genetic resources management and these issues are being addressed at national and intergovernmental levels, in a process led by FAO to promote greater international collaboration on animal genetic resources. Based on an analysis of the current situation, the continuing loss of indigenous breeds and new developments in science and technology, there are several complementary actions that can begin to improve the management of animal genetic resources and maintain future options in an uncertain world. These are summarized here as: a. \"Keep it on the hoof\" -Encouraging the continuing sustainable use of traditional breeds and in situ conservation by providing market-driven incentives, public policy and ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ 4Dynamics of production, changes and prospects for AnGR other support to enable livestock keepers to maintain genetic diversity in their livestock populations. b. \"Move it or lose it\" -Enabling access to and the safe movement of animal genetic resources within and between countries, regions and continents is a key factor in use, development and conservation of animal genetic resources globally. c. \"Match breeds to environments\" -Understanding the match between livestock populations, breeds and genes with the physical, biological and economic landscape. This \"landscape livestock genomics\" approach offers the means to predict the genotypes most appropriate to a given environment and, in the longer term, to understand the genetic basis of adaptation of the genotype to the environment. d. \"Put some in the bank\" --New technologies make ex situ, in vitro conservation of animal genetic resources feasible for critical situations and are a way to provide long-term insurance against future shocks. The multiple values, functions and consequences of livestock production systems and their rapid rate of change lead to divergent interests within and between countries. Conversely, the uncertainty about the implications of rapid, multifaceted global change for each livestock production system and the resulting future changes in the required genetic make-up of animal genetic resources make collective action to tackle conservation of animal genetic resources a longterm, global public good. Conserving animal genetic resources will not by itself solve these problems, but it is an important first step towards maintaining future options.Advances in science and the technology, in areas such as reproductive technology, genomics and spatial analysis, as well as progress in conceptualization of global public good production for the future management of animal genetic resources, should enable the international community to address both the short-and long-term challenges in innovative ways.Ce résumé analyse les facteurs clés qui ont subi des changements dans le secteur élevage et propose une évaluation de l'influence qu'ils ont eu sur la situation actuelle et les prospectives futures dans les différents systèmes d'élevage et de marché au niveau mondial. On analyse également les impacts sur la gestion des ressources génétiques animales pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture. Cette tendance se retrouve aussi bien dans les pays industrialisés que dans ceux en développement, mais les réponses sont différentes. Dans les pays en développement ces tendances ont une influence directe sur la capacité que présente l'élevage à contribuer à l'amélioration de la qualité de vie et à la réduction de la pauvreté, ainsi qu'à l'utilisation des ressources naturelles. Dans le monde industrialisé la proximité de la base des ressources génétiques animales avec les systèmes de production d'élevage au niveau industriel ont porté au besoin de conserver une plus grande gamme des ressources génétiques animales pour faire face aux incertitudes futures telles que le changement climatique et les zoonoses.Dans l'article on discute de: • Quels sont les principaux facteurs de changement dans les systèmes d'élevage? • Comment répondent les systèmes de production d'élevage aux facteurs de changement au niveau mondial? • Quelles sont les implications sur la diversité des ressources génétiques animales et pour les prospectives d'utilisation futures? • Quels sont les démarches immédiates qui permettront une amélioration de la caractérisation des ressources génétiques animales, leur utilisation et conservation? D'après une récente analyse de la situation actuelle, de la perte continue de races indigènes et du nouveau développement de la science et de la technologie, il existe différentes actions complémentaires qui pourraient aider à améliorer la gestion des ressources génétiques animales et conserver des options pour le futur dans un monde plein d'incertitude.Ces actions peuvent se résumés comme il suit: • Encourager l'utilisation durable des races traditionnelles. • Permettre l'accès et la vente de ressources génétiques animales dans et entre pays. • Compréhension du rapport entre élevage, races et gènes avec le milieu physique, biologique et économique. • La formation de stock comme assurance future.L'incertitude sur les implications des changements rapides sur chacun des systèmes de production animale et les changements futurs que cela entraîne en terme de demande de ressources génétiques animales, requière d'une action collective pour faire face à la conservation des ressources génétiques animales en tant que bien Este resumen analiza los factores clave que han cambiado en el sector ganadero y hace una evaluación de cómo han influenciado la corriente actual y las prospectivas futuras en los distintos sistemas de producción ganadera y mercados en el mundo. También se analizan los consiguientes impactos sobre la gestión de los recursos zoogenéticos para la alimentación y la agricultura. La tendencia se da tanto en países industrializados como en vía de desarrollo pero las respuestas son distintas. En los países en vía de desarrollo estas tendencias están afectando la capacidad ganadera para contribuir a la mejora de la calidad de la vida y reducción de la pobreza, así como la utilización de los recursos naturales. En el mundo industrializado la proximidad de la base de recursos zoogenéticos con los sistemas de producción ganadera industrial plantean la necesidad de mantener un mayor rango de recursos zoogenéticos para hacer frente a las incertidumbres futuras, tales como el cambio climático y las zoonosis. En este capitulo se discute: • Cúales son los principales factores de cambio en los sistemas ganaderos? • Cómo responden los sistemas de producción ganadera a los factores de cambio a nivel mundial? • Cúales son las implicaciones para la diversidad de recursos zoogenéticos y para las prospectivas futuras de su utilización? • Cúales son los pasos inmediatos que puedan permitir la mejora de la caracterización de los recursos zoogenéticos, su utilización y conservación? Sobre la base de un reciente análisis de la situación actual, la pérdida de razas indígenas y el nuevo desarrollo de la ciencia y la tecnología, existen distintas acciones complementarias que pueden empezar a ayudar a mejorar la gestión de los recursos zoogenéticos y mantener opciones futuras en un mundo lleno de incertidumbres.Tales acciones se resumen así: • Fomentar la continua utilización sostenible de razas tradicionales. • Permitir el acceso y movimiento para venta de recursos zoogenéticos dentro y entre paises.• Conocer la relación entre poblaciones ganaderas, razas y genes con el entorno físico, biológico y económico. • Conservar stocks para hacer frente a incertidumbres futuras. La incertidumbre sobre las implicaciones de cambios rápidos, multifacéticos y globales para cada sistema de producción ganadera y los consiguientes cambios futuros en la demanda de recursos zoogenéticos requieren una acción colectiva para hacer frente a la conservación de recursos zoogenéticos a largo plazo como bien publico mundial. La conservación de losThis overview paper analyses the key drivers of change in the global livestock sector and assesses how they are influencing current trends and future prospects in the world's diverse livestock production systems and market chains; and what are their consequent impacts on the management of animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. The trends are occurring in both developing and industrialized countries, but the responses are different. In the developing world, the trends are affecting the ability of livestock to contribute to improving livelihoods and reducing poverty as well as the use of natural resources. In the industrialized world, the narrowing animal genetic resource base in industrial livestock production systems raises the need to maintain a broader range of animal genetic resources to be able to deal with future uncertainties, such as climate change and zoonotic diseases.The range of livestock covered here are domesticated species, particularly the five major economic species (cattle, sheep, goats, chickens and pigs). There are no detailed figures yet to link specific breeds with specific production systems. We are tackling the problems from a production system angle. Throughout the paper, and based on the findings of The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, we use the approximation that commercial breeds, as a subgroup of international transboundary breeds, are used in intensive, high-external input livestock ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ 6 Dynamics of production, changes and prospects for AnGR production systems (termed \"industrial systems\"), and that local breeds are the basis in most extensive and low-external input systems. These are called here \"pastoral systems\" and \"crop-livestock systems\", respectively.This paper covers four main areas: Livestock production is a complex and heterogeneous part of global agriculture. It ranges from highly automated, intensive large-scale production of pigs and poultry and, to a lesser degree, cattle, to small-scale, largely scavenging production of backyard pigs and chicken. Domestication of livestock started several millennia ago and humans have shaped the genetic make-up of domesticated animals to respond to human needs in different production environments. This genetic make-up of livestock that resulted from this long-term process has been put under stress by fast-paced changes over the past few decades, across the entire range of biophysical, social and economic contexts in which humans keep animals. These changes can be subsumed under terms of economic development and globalization. These are themselves largely driven by technical progress, plus the global exchange of knowledge and products. These trends are also characterized by unequal access to natural resources, financing, markets, technology and personal mobility.Since 1945, the world has seen an unprecedented economic growth, starting in the industrialized economies (countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]) and expanding into the rest of the world over the past two decades. The latter is epitomized by the economic growth path of China. A number of developing countries, mainly in Asia and Latin America, have undergone major transformations associated with significant growth in their economies and increases in per capita incomes.The socio-economic indicators for selected countries are given in table 1. The following inferences can be drawn from the data: • The contribution of livestock to agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) demonstrates the significance of the livestock sector in many economies (providing value addition); this occurs even in countries that are experiencing rapid economic growth (India and China) and/or have a growing share of industrial livestock systems (China, Brazil and Argentina). • The key demand drivers of GDP growth and urbanization point towards growing demand for livestock products across all regions in the developing world. This \"livestock revolution\" is discussed further below. • The trends in foreign direct investment (FDI) show that increases in FDI are concentrated in a few countries (China and India). These countries are ones in which the industrialization of livestock production has been rising sharply. Some other countries in Africa (e.g. Kenya and Botswana) have also recorded significant increases in FDI over the past decade, although from a lower base. Economic development has led to important changes in the spatial distribution of the world's population, leading to a rapid process of urbanization in the developing world. At the same time, breakthroughs in medical research and their applications have led to dramatic increases of the human population in developing countries. In the industrialized world, population growth rates have declined in the last decades as social security, female employment in labour-scarce economies and cultural/social changes have led to declining birth rates and gradually aging populations. In terms of consumer demand, there is more demand for \"fast food\" and processed animal products. Food safety requirements are becoming increasingly stringent, due to disease problems such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) associated with processed animal products. A similar trend is occurring in developing countries, although currently limited to the affluent urban class. 1990-1995 average 2000-2005 average 1990 1995 2000 2005 1990 2004 1990-2004 1997-1999 2000-2002 2003-2005 Sub Another key driver of change that is leading towards larger-scale, cereal-based animal production systems around the world has been the rise in labour costs in the industrialized economies and in some parts of the developing world, as a result of economic growth and rising incomes.Changing economic policy associated with rapid economic growth in parts of the developing world (e.g. Asian \"tiger\" economies) has changed the investment climate in emerging economies and led to massive inflows of FDI. Similarly, labour migration from developing to industrialized economies has generated capital flows back to developing countries, which are often larger than official development assistance. Capital investments from outside the farming community, for example in the feed industry and livestock production chains in Southeast Asia, are also influencing changes in livestock production systems.The effects of globalization and growing incomes have by no means been evenly distributed within or between countries. In the context of rapid population growth, many countries and social and ethnic groups within countries have not participated in the growth process. Large numbers of poor people, particularly in rural areas, have been left behind or adversely affected by the changes. For example, such communities may actually suffer from loss of access to natural resources, bear the brunt of environmental impacts and be characterized by the breakdown of traditional social and economic ties and values, without a better (or at least viable) alternative. Also, local breeds of animals are often not competitive in this changing world.These inequalities pose a major challenge for the global community, which has responded by setting the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), a UN-driven process to address several core problems facing the world. The MDGs include a commitment to halve the numbers of people living in poverty by 2015, as well as setting several other key development targets, including protecting the environment and conserving biodiversity. The sustainable use and conservation of the world's animal genetic resources for food and agriculture supports the Millennium Development Goals 1 and 7, and is also covered by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).Growing demand for animal products -as well as higher standards to improve the quality and safety of the products -and more processed animal products have substantial consequences for the evolution of livestock production systems. Overall, the processes of economic development, population growth, urbanization and changing patterns of consumption have led to a dramatic increase in the consumption of animal products in the developing world, a process that has been termed the \"livestock revolution\". FAO data suggest that this trend is expected to continue for several decades because of the strong direct correlation between rising income and increasing animal product consumption.Figure 1 shows the expected percentage changes in per capita consumption of selected food commodities in developing and industrialized countries between 2001 and 2030, providing evidence of the \"livestock revolution\" occurring in the developing world. There are large differences between the projected per capita growth rates in consumption of livestock products (meat and milk) between developing and industrialized countries. There are also marked differences in the per capita growth rates of the different products in developing countries, with meat and milk being the highest, followed by oil seeds. Growth rates for cereal consumption as human food are stagnating everywhere, but increasing for other uses, especially for animal feed and biofuels.The consumption of milk and meat per capita are shown in figures 2 and 3, respectively. These data illustrate substantial differences in current consumption of meat and milk between industrialized and developing countries; the rates of growth in consumption are higher in the developing world. This trend is part of the \"livestock revolution\" and is the result of increased demand and increased incomes, economic growth and urbanization in developing countries. Consumption per capita of milk and meat is currently between two and four times higher in industrialized countries than in the developing world but, in absolute terms, demand is higher in the developing world.The growing demand for animal products in the developing world is associated with the changes in production location, facilitated by the increasing ease of transporting feed and animal products around the world. Animal products were previously produced close to where the consumers live. Increasingly, livestock production now takes Dynamics of production, changes and prospects for AnGR place close to the locations with good access to feed, either in feed production areas or ports. The animal products are then transported to markets. This trend is changing the competitiveness of diverse livestock production systems worldwide, with more animal products being produced in lower cost economies (mainly in industrial and crop-livestock systems) and traded in domestic, regional and international markets.At the same time, large numbers of poor people depend on livestock production for their livelihoods and, for some of them, livestock offer a pathway out of poverty. These smallholders and pastoralists frequently compete for markets with the commercial sector, which is producing animal products in industrial systems worldwide. Smallholders and pastoralists together with their traditional breeds are increasingly being pushed out by the industrial systems coming into the developing world. Hence there is pressure for smallholders and pastoralists to replace their traditional breeds with more productive but less resilient breeds in order to be able to compete in the expanding livestock markets in the developing world.Technological developments associated with international transport, partially related to the increased access to capital and the opening of many economies, have dramatically increased the role of international trade in animal products. The expansion of international trade in animal products has brought to the fore the need to establish more stringent animal health and food safety standards, in order to manage the risks to the domestic sector of individual countries and to protect consumers. These health and food safety requirements have been driven by the growing problems of animal diseases, including zoonoses. These disease risks are linked to a number of factors including increasing stock numbers, the intimate cohabitation of poor families with their animals and the increased global movement of animals and animal products.Domestic markets, including the informal livestock product markets, handle the largest share of the livestock products consumed in developing countries. However, in urban areas, the modern food retail sector is also growing rapidly, and imposing specific requirements in terms of quality assurance and homogeneity of the products (of national and international origin). The term \"supermarket revolution\" has been coined for these processes. These two marketing systems require markedly different food safety and biosecurity standards, affecting livestock production systems supplying these markets. Table 2 shows that the share of supermarkets in food retailing has been increasing over the past two decades in much of the developing world. If current trends in expanding urban populations continue, the share of supermarkets in the urban food retail sector in the developing world will increase to levels that they are now in the industrialized economies (i.e. about 80 percent of the total food retail sector). The changing set of actors implied by the supermarket revolution and the growing importance of agribusiness in food retailing will have important implications for poor farmers.The coexistence of three markets for animal products in the developing world (the traditional, frequently informal markets, the growing formal (super)markets for the urban middle classes and the regional/international export markets) poses particularly daunting challenges for policy-makers in pursuing mutually compatible policies of: 1. protecting livelihoods among the smallholder livestock keepers and pastoralists; 2. upporting efficient markets for the urban population; and 3. encouraging active engagement of livestock producers and their traditional breeds in the regional and global livestock markets.The livestock product markets in industrialized countries are evolving along quite different paths. Besides consuming relatively inexpensive livestock products from large-scale industrial systems, there is increasing demand for niche products, frequently linked with certification of origin, often produced in traditional ways or with specific breeds, by \"organic agriculture\", and/or with particular concern for animal welfare.Animal welfare is an increasing area of concern, especially in markets in industrialized countries. These concerns include caring for animals in all types of production systems. There is particular criticism of intensive housing systems for animals (e.g. chickens, pigs, dairy cows). This is leading to more animal friendly housing systems such as group housing of sows; and free range hens as alternatives for the caging for laying hens. Some consumers in industrialized countries are prepared to pay a premium for animal products coming from Dynamics of production, changes and prospects for AnGR such production systems that take account of animal welfare concerns. Animal welfare concerns are highly culture-specific and, while important in some societies, others consider them to be non-tariff trade barriers. Some of these trends will dictate breeds and breeding practices -for example, performance under range conditions and \"broodiness\" of hens will be important attributes for the niche markets.In the industrialized countries, hobby farming has become a popular activity, using relatively small land areas for limited numbers of livestock such as sheep, goats, horses and cattle. For in situ conservation of species and breeds within species, these part-time farmers are important contributors.The rapid population growth and the growing consumption of goods and services by people whose incomes are growing puts pressure on natural resources and the environment. Livestock production, under certain conditions, is driving degradation processes and is at the same time affected by them. Increasing land use for food crops and crops for biofuels is increasing the pressure on rangelands and other open access or community managed resources. This affects the viability of the low-input production systems, the sustainable use of traditional breeds and thus the livelihoods of pastoralists and smallholders.At the same time, the rapid growth of large-scale, intensive animal production units puts a serious constraint on the capacity of the environment to deal with carbon dioxide and methane output, nutrient loading in certain areas, effluent into rivers and seas, loss of biodiversity because of land clearing to grow feeds (for example, soybeans in Latin America) and other environmental impacts.The recent FAO ( 2006) report Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options focused on the effects of livestock on the environment. The \"long shadow\" refers to the negative effects of the livestock food chain on almost all aspects of the environment; livestock production is associated with carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions, water depletion, soil erosion, soil fertility, damage to plants, loss of biodiversity and competition with wildlife.As population and living standards grow, natural resources become a limiting factor. Particularly in marginal zones for rangeland-based animal production (pastoral systems), alternative land uses such as provision of opportunities for carbon sequestration through trees or wildlife conservation may become increasingly competitive with livestock production. On the other hand, livestock production in pastoral systems can be complementary to other services -for example, livestock production provides a means to maintain shrub/rangeland systems, with grazing reducing the risk of fire in extensive rangelands and providing other ecological services.The relationship between livestock production and climate change works in both directions. On the one hand, livestock contributes significantly to climate change via carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide production (calculated in FAO (2006) at 18 percent of the total global greenhouse gas emissions from human sources). On the other hand, climate change will have important effects on farming systems and on the role of livestock, both directly and indirectly.For example, large parts of Africa and Central Asia are likely to experience reductions in the length of growing period as a result of increased temperatures and lower rainfall. This is likely to lead to lower crop yields and reduced rangeland productivity, thus affecting the provision of feeds for animals. Climate change is also likely to change the distribution of animal diseases and their vectors. Large parts of South and Southeast Asia are likely to experience increases in rainfall and in the number of extreme climatic events (e.g. cyclones). This could lead to increased exposure of livestock to diseases, such as those caused by helminths. Crop losses due to extremes in climate could result in less animal feed being available, especially in crop-livestock and pastoral systems.Science and technology have had a major influence on the transformation of animal production in industrialized economies and increasingly in developing countries. With increasing labour scarcity, larger, high-output and more productive animals were bred. From multipurpose breeds, highly specialized breeds were developed. Generally, disease resistance was sacrificed for higher output, taking into account that through capital investments it became possible to adapt the environment to the existing animals in ways that had not been possible in the past. Research into housing and mechanization allowed significant labour productivity increases. These advances occurred in many species but particularly in short-cycled monogastric species such as poultry and pigs.Animal nutrition research, linked with breeding, has made major contributions to improving feed efficiency and shortening production cycles and thereby reducing maintenance feed requirements and allowing a more efficient use of the capital investments and natural resources.In the developing world, the impact of modern livestock science and technology has been uneven. Industrial livestock production systems (mainly for chickens) with limited links to the local resource base have been developed in some locations close to urban demand and/or to ports, given their frequent dependence on imported feed. Smallholder crop-livestock systems are much more reliant on locally available feed and traditional breeds. These crop-livestock systems are highly complex, delivering multiple products and services. Progress in improving the sustainable productivity of these systems has been much more limited and is a significant research challenge. System-based research is required to help these systems change in line with the changing social, economic and environmental context in which they operate. Currently, the speed of change of animal production systems and market chains is very high in some locations/regions, and is accompanied by loss of animal genetic resources. (This is discussed further below.)The science related to the management of animal genetic resources has made significant progress, based mainly on advances in molecular biology and genetics as well as new developments in information and communications technology (ICT). The main advances are summarized in this paper and are discussed in more detail in the following papers. The advances include: In order to take full advantage of the opportunities presented by advances in ICT, it is necessary to develop common standards for characterizing animal genetic resources, in terms of their genetics, phenotype and production system, so that knowledge can be shared among different communities and countries. Given such systematic and standardized descriptions of livestock, the intersection between new ICTs and modern genetics, through genomics and bioinformatics, presents opportunities to examine genome function by integration of these rich data sets.In the light of the above drivers of change, this section discusses: • The relative importance of the three main livestock systems worldwide (industrial, crop-livestock and pastoral) and the breeds they harbour. • The implications of global drivers of change for the different livestock production systems. • The implications for livelihoods.• The implications of the scope and rate of changes in the main livestock production systems for current and future animal genetic resources management.The geographic distribution of the major livestock species worldwide is given in table 3. This table shows that for all species the majority of animals are in the developing world. It also shows the importance of different species by region. For example, ruminants are most important in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Latin America (LAC), both continents with vast areas of savannah and relatively low population densities. Poultry is most important in East Asia and the Pacific and LAC, regions of either high economic growth or with middle-income countries with high degrees of urbanization and adequate market infrastructure.Three major types of livestock production systems can be identified worldwide -industrial livestock systems (IS); crop/livestock systems, mainly in high potential areas (CLS); and pastoral systems, mainly in marginal areas (PS).The share of livestock in each of these systems in different geographic regions is shown in table 4. These data show that most livestock are located in crop-livestock systems. The proportion of livestock in industrial systems by region is mainly a function of economic status and rate of growth (e.g. higher proportions of industrial systems in the industrialized world and Asia).Each of the three main livestock production systems responds differently to the effects of the global drivers of change, and therefore has different development and investment needs. The overarching trends are increasing intensification in both industrial systems and in crop-livestock systems in order to meet increasing demand for animal products and consumer preferences for higher-quality products that meet stringent food safety standards.• Intensification and scaling up trends in industrial and crop-livestock production systems.The demand for livestock products has been met by intensification of livestock production systems in both developing and industrialized countries. Among other factors, this intensification has been based on using cereal grains as livestock feed. For example, in OECD countries, livestock feeding in intensive systems accounts for two-thirds of the average per capita grain consumption. In contrast, crop-livestock systems in sub-Saharan Africa and India use less than 10 percent of grains as feeds as they rely mostly on crop-residues (40-70 percent of feed), grazing and planted fodders. • Market characteristics and demand.The trend towards intensification of industrial systems and crop-livestock systems is largely driven by consumer demands for livestock products, both fresh and processed. The market characteristics are increasing demand for animal products in developing countries, plus quality preferences and food safety requirements in all markets. Public-private partnerships that provide services and market opportunities also play a key role in intensifying industrial and crop-livestock systems.Intensive systems. Intensive systems are facing increasing restrictions, owing to their associated negative environmental effects, such as problems of waste disposal and water contamination. Demand Dynamics of production, changes and prospects for AnGR for cereals is also increasing for other purposes (e.g. biofuels) and this is driving up the price of cereals, and subsequently the price of livestock products coming from intensive systems. Crop-livestock systems. Crop-livestock systems in developing countries are constrained by farm size and lack of access to inputs and services. These constraints affect soil fertility, crop yields, income generation and ultimately livestock production through the limited provision of high-quality feeds. There is also increasing competition for land and associated opportunity costs.Pastoral systems. The remoteness and the limited agricultural potential of pastoral systems in marginal areas of the developing world create difficulties for these systems to integrate into the expanding markets for livestock products. This poses a set of different needs related to adaptation of systems to reduce the vulnerability of livestock keepers and their animals and expanding access to markets.A major driver of change in pastoral systems over the past decades has been the widespread policy to settle pastoralists and allocate them individual land rights. This approach and the increasing encroachment of crop production have seriously affected the viability of these systems by reducing the mobility of livestock and access to feed resources. Although the negative aspects of these policies are increasingly acknowledged, they will continue to shape political processes in many developing countries.In the industrial and mixed crop-livestock systems, rising demand for livestock products will continue to drive structural changes in these livestock production systems and markets. Market transformation, particularly in urban markets, will lead to the increasing importance of supermarkets, large livestock processors and transformation of wholesale livestock markets. Much of this transformation has taken place in the industrialized countries. This pattern is expected to increase in the developing world with a growing share of industrial livestock systems.Farmers in intensifying crop-livestock systems will diversify their production into dairy and other livestock products even more in response to market opportunities arising from rising demand for high-value foods. Similarly, income growth and urbanization will increase diversification of consumer diets and the share of livestock products in diets.The major changes in livestock markets are going to take place in domestic markets. The relative importance of domestic markets versus trade in the future will reflect past trends in which domestic market dynamics were far more important than trade. For example, in 1980 and 2001, meat exports and imports were approximately four percent of output and consumption in the developing world. In contrast, the share of domestic urban markets in total livestock consumption has been increasing over the past 25 years.The growing importance of domestic urban markets as opposed to international trade implies changes of actors in domestic livestock industries, particularly in agribusiness in wholesale markets, livestock processing and the retail industry, with more fresh and processed animal products being sold through supermarkets.These structural changes in markets, transformation in urban markets, and in retail and distribution sectors in the livestock industry will have profound impacts for the future of smallholders and poor livestock keepers in competing with intensifying industrial and crop-livestock systems in high potential areas. Empirical evidence from Asia shows that smallholder farmers provide up to half of the share of production in dairy and meat markets. Undercapitalized small producers are likely to be squeezed out of dynamic domestic livestock markets. Policy action that supports small producers who can be helped to become competitive will have substantial equity pay-offs. In the absence of such pro-poor policies in the livestock sector, market changes and the entry of new actors in livestock processing, distribution chains and the retail sector can marginalize poor people who depend on livestock for their livelihoods.High transaction costs and limited access to markets will lead to a dramatic decline of share of livestock production from pastoral systems in marginal areas. Without significant public investments in infrastructure and services, poor producers in these areas will become increasingly marginalized and many will have to leave livestock production as a source of income. Livestock will continue to be important in traditional pastoral systems as sources of food and fulfil multiple other uses, providing traction, transport, skins and hides for shelter. In terms of livelihood impacts, the above changes will lead to changes in the role of animal genetic resources for livelihoods in two divergent ways: in intensive systems livelihoods will have a weak link to genetic resources, which will play very specialized production roles. The major livelihood impacts will be through employment. Frequently this will be limited direct employment in large-scale operations but some increased employment will be expected along the value chain. Consumer livelihoods will be affected in terms of impact of prices and of changed attributes of the animal products coming from these intensive systems. Society-wide, there may be negative impacts on livelihoods of traditional smallholders displaced from markets by industrially produced animal products. The net effects will depend significantly on the policy environment and the extent of substitution between animal products produced by industrial systems and smallholder systems.In crop-livestock systems, livelihoods will be affected by the pressures to intensify and specialize production. Systems may change from grazing to zero-grazed systems, increasing milk production while reducing animal traction. This will imply changes in the labour patterns and possibly gender distribution of work and benefits from animal production. More intensively kept animals will require higher levels of management and external inputs. Increasing livelihood opportunities can be expected to develop in these forward and backward linkages associated with these commodity chains.Pastoral systems in developing countries tend to have very strong linkages to diverse species and breeds of animals, which allow them to adapt to the exploitation of natural resources with very unique attributes and generally very limited alternative uses. Livelihoods are intimately linked to the animal genetic resources under these conditions. Risk is a major issue and the management of multiple species and multiple outputs is a key way of coping. Increasing competition for the resources, as well as policy orientations towards settling pastoralists, significantly affect these peoples' livelihoods.In the industrialized world, highly specialized pastoral production systems rely heavily on their animal genetic resources -normally a narrow genetic base comprising one or two commercial breeds of one or two species or a defined crossbred animal population. In relation to pastoral and smallholder systems in developing countries, these systems do not involve much labour. Therefore, the livelihoods of fewer people are generally involved in these production systems.The drivers of change and the evolution of the farming systems that they induce will have important effects on livestock biodiversity and its use. This in turn implies that needs and opportunities for human intervention will vary.In industrial systems, where it is largely possible to adapt the environment to the needs of the animals, highly productive commercial breeds and hybrids are going to be the main genetic pillar. Genetic resources are handled by the specialized private sector firms and traded internationally. Their interest in hardiness or disease-resistance traits will be limited unless diseases emerge for which no alternative control strategies are available or policies require important changes in the management systems, e.g. free-ranging instead of caged laying hens.In crop-livestock systems, pressure to intensify will be a major force shaping the production system and the genetic resources underpinning it. Significant increases in productivity will be required to meet demand and these will be achieved by simultaneously improving the conditions (feed, health, etc) and adapting the genetic resources. Given the heterogeneous environments, many different breeds will be required. In higher potential areas with good market access this specialization will increasingly involve crossbreeding with exotic breeds. Given the relatively small numbers of animals of each breed required in these niches, these genetic materials will not be produced by private multinational companies but will require active engagement of farmers, public sector and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). These systems will continue to be an important source of genetic diversity and will also demand a range of solutions to fit their specific conditions. As science improves its capacity to understand the role of specific genes and their interaction with environmental factors triggering their expression, the value of local breeds in targeted breeding programmes for these systems will increase. These systems will naturally use a diverse genetic base and will be amenable to engage with in situ conservation. Supportive institutional arrangements will be key to driving such efforts.In pastoral systems in developing countries, high levels of diversity can be encountered and traits of disease-resistance and tolerance of harsh environments are widely present. These systems are frequently declining in livestock numbers and in particular small endemic populations are at risk. In these settings, conservation will require public action because of the limited resources of the generally poor pastoralists. This will be an area where NGOs can be expected to play a key role in assisting in in situ conservation.Given the fragility of institutional arrangements in many developing country contexts and their exposure to natural and human-induced crises, there is merit in designing ex situ, in vitro conservation strategies as a back up and long-term insurance against loss of diversity in the field. These conservation strategies will need to be coordinated at national and regional/international levels to be efficient and cost-effective.Climate change considerations add an important dimension to the discussion of livestock biodiversity. Different systems will be affected in different and highly uncertain ways, but access to genetic resources could be a critical ingredient for most adaptation responses in the medium to long term. Table 5 summarizes major trends in livestock system evolution and their implications for the management of animal genetic resources.What immediate steps are possible to improve animal genetic resources characterization, use and conservation?Appropriate institutional and policy frameworks are required to improve animal genetic resources management and these issues are being addressed at national and intergovernmental levels, in a process led by FAO to promote greater international collaboration. Based on an analysis of the current situation, the continuing loss of indigenous breeds of farm animals, new developments in science and technology, and the strategies suggested for the future management of animal genetic resources (as summarized in table 5), there are several complementary actions that can begin to improve the management of animal genetic resources and maintain future options in an uncertain world. The scientific basis that underpins these proposed actions is discussed in more detail in subsequent papers. Four areas for action to improve the sustainable use and in situ conservation, characterization and long-term ex situ conservation of animal genetic resources are summarized here, and are addressed in further detail in the companion papers:\"Keep it on the hoof\" -Encouraging the continuing sustainable use of traditional breeds and in situ conservation of animal genetic resources, by providing market-driven incentives, public policy and other support to enable livestock keepers to maintain genetic diversity in their livestock populations.In this context, sustainable use refers to the continuing use of traditional breeds by livestock keepers, as a result of market-driven incentives. In situ conservation refers to animal genetic resources conservation measures supported by public policy and, on occasion, public investments to support in situ conservation of traditional breeds by livestock keepers.In regard to encouraging the sustainable use of animal genetic resources, market-driven incentives applicable in developing countries include facilitating access to markets for livestock products coming from traditional breeds. This may include identifying niche markets for traditional products and providing infrastructure (such as transport) to help livestock keepers to get their products to market.Increasing the productivity of traditional breeds through breeding is also an incentive for livestock keepers to retain these breeds. (The companion paper discusses the role of breeding in more detail.) These breed improvement strategies could also make more use of the widespread crossing that has occurred in traditional populations over time, as livestock keepers seek to improve their breeds.In regard to encouraging in situ conservation of particular breeds, especially in the diversity-rich crop-livestock and pastoral systems in developing countries, the incentives include having public policies that support the conservation of traditional breeds and providing public services (e.g. human and livestock health services, schools, roads) to support communities in livestock producing areas. Such services may encourage people to stay with their animals in rural areas rather than migrate to urban areas where more services are available.In situ conservation makes use of local and indigenous knowledge, which can also be validated scientifically. For example, some farmers have realized that by crossbreeding part of their herd to an exotic breed, they can make more profit during the good times but avoid the risk of losing all their animals when conditions are bad. Exotic animals tend to be poorly adapted to harsh conditions and tend to die during droughts, for example. Thus genetic variability reduces vulnerability to sudden changes and shocks in the system.The concept of in situ conservation also extends to conserving livestock as part of the landscape, within an overall biodiversity conservation strategy, as a long-term global public good.\"Move it or lose it\" -Enabling access and safe movement of animal genetic resources within and between countries, regions and continents.Maintaining mobility of animal breeds, populations and genes within and between countries, regions and continents is one of the key actions for facilitating the sustainable use and thereby the conservation of animal genetic resources. Safe movement of animal genetic resources enables their access, use and conservation for mutual benefit by livestock keepers worldwide. Mobility here refers to facilitating informed access to genetic diversity, based on systematic breed evaluations and analysing the potential usefulness of various breeds in different environments.There are benefits and risks in increasing the mobility of animal genetic resources. The benefit is that, in a fast-changing, unpredictable world, mobility of animal genetic resources enables flexibility in response to changing climate, disasters, civil strife, etc. For example, when civil strife has occurred in some part of Africa, animals are moved across borders to avoid their unintended death in conflicts. One risk of increased mobility is that animals moving to different environments may not be adapted to their new environment, livestock system or social system. There are also animal health risks, in terms of the possible spread of disease, or by animals not being tolerant to the diseases prevalent in a new environment. For Table 5. Trends in livestock system evolution and their implications for the management of animal genetic resources.AnGR -current status in system AnGR management: future strategy for each livestock production system Industrial systems (IS) Industrial systems changing quickly, expanding globally. Dynamics of production, changes and prospects for AnGR transboundary movements, these risks as well as the benefit should be identified and shared with stakeholders prior to importation, and risk mitigation steps taken before importing semen, embryos or live animals into a country.\"Match breeds to environments\" -Understanding the match between livestock breeds, populations and genes and the physical, biological and economic landscape. This \"landscape livestock genomics\" approach offers the means to predict the genotypes most appropriate to a given environment and, in the longer term, to understand the genetic basis of adaptation of the genotype to the environment.In regard to the long-term prospects for this research, the advances in our ability to describe the genome of an animal in unprecedented detail, coupled with our ability (through spatial analysis) to describe the landscape in which it resides -a landscape description that includes biotic, abiotic, human and market influences -are beginning to provide an opportunity to probe genome function in a unique way. This is an approach already used to study the distribution of particular alleles in livestock and to probe the human genome for disease-causing genes. Its potential for understanding the fit between livestock genotype and landscape is significant, and it depends on sophisticated data-management tools. It also offers the opportunity not only to understand the function of the genome, but also to predict the genotype most appropriate to a given environment. This is a long-term research objective that can be linked with existing data-gathering exercises to add to their value. For example, building in systematic sampling of DNA of livestock breeds in combination with a careful description of the systems under which each population presently functions, and georeferencing the data, will add greatly to our ability to understand and utilize animal genetic resources. For example, we can begin to ask \"what combination of genotypes is appropriate for a milking cow under a given management regime, under a given range of disease pressures and under a given set of physical stresses?\" Knowing this will enhance the value of genotypes \"in the bank\" or \"on the hoof\" and will provide the tools we need to identify intelligently appropriate genotypes for specific agro-ecological niches. (Approaches to characterizing AnGR are discussed further in the companion paper.)\"Put some in the bank\" -New technologies make ex situ, in vitro conservation of animal genetic resources feasible for critical situations and a way to provide long-term insurance against future shocks in all livestock production systems.Improving technology (e.g. cryopreservation) is making long-term, ex situ, in vitro conservation of semen and embryos more feasible, affordable and applicable to a wider range of species. The challenge is to decide which animal genetic resources to conserve; how to collect them; where to store them; when and how to characterize them; and who can access, use and benefit from them in the future. It is particularly important to collect the rich diversity of traditional livestock breeds in croplivestock and pastoral systems in developing countries before it is lost forever.A risk is that ex situ, in vitro gene banks can become \"stamp collections\", put away in the deep freeze and never characterized. Another potential risk is that this approach may be a disincentive to in situ conservation through sustainable use, where the genetic resources are more accessible in the short to medium term and where not only the genetic resources but also the traditional knowledge associated with them are conserved. In fact, in situ and ex situ conservation approaches are complementary rather than competing approaches, serving short-and long-term needs. Ex situ, in vitro animal genetic resources conservation is a long-term insurance policy and an important first step in conserving animal genetic resources for future generations. (Further details on conservation approaches are given in the companion paper.)Several important drivers of change are leading to rapid changes in the livestock production sector that have implications for the future management of animal genetic resources. The multiple values, functions and consequences of livestock production systems and their rapid rate of change lead to divergent interests within and between countries. Conversely, the uncertainty about the implications of rapid, multifaceted global change for each livestock production system and the resulting future changes in the required genetic make-up of the animals makes collective action to tackle conservation of animal genetic resources a long-term, global public good. Developing and conserving animal genetic resources will not by themselves solve all these problems, but are important first steps towards maintaining future options.Advances in science and technology, in areas such as reproductive technology, genomics and spatial analysis, as well as progress in conceptualization of global public good production for the future management of animal genetic resources, should enable the international community to address both the short-and long-term challenges in innovative ways."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3663682048.json b/main/part_2/3663682048.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6bc7f57f3c3ad56a4fc8e08586298d8516b30007 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3663682048.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f9f6afc5dfb22d6c7ed786c4c8fcc064","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4ede5b0a-938f-4cc0-be33-fda1951f73d9/retrieve","id":"-1995577362"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"483435c8-ab94-44c5-ba05-314169a74ed1","content":"Discover how CTA has transformed lives through agricultural and rural development BOOK LAUNCH Get your copy now http://publications.cta.int 4 | Cover story 6 | Agriculture 8 | Fisheries and livestock 9 | Environment 10 | Research 11 | Business and trade 12 | Interview 13 | DOSSIER ICT: the digital revolution Transforming smallholder farming through iCTs 17 | Viewpoint iCow: milking the benefits information by mobile for improved dairy production 18 | Field report Cameroon: a new life from ICTs new technologies for a more level playing field 20 | Value chains Tropical wood: a change of perception 21 | Publications 25 | Get on board with CTA is the bi-monthly magazine of the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA). CTA operates under the Cotonou Agreement between the countries of the Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group and the European Union and is financed by the EU. • CTAFrom delivering price information to providing services in extension, weather forecasts, farm management, insurance, and mobile banking, information and communication technologies (ICTs), particularly mobile phones, are playing a key role in transforming the rural landscape across the developing world. With the fastest rate of growth in mobile subscribers, Africa has become a hotbed of innovation in mobile applications, including apps for agriculture. According to the GSM Association, an association of mobile providers, the contribution of mobile phones to the economy of sub-Saharan Africa is set to double by 2020, employing 6.6 million people and contributing €30.5 billion to public coffers. With agriculture playing a predominant role in Africa's socioeconomic landscape, the projected growth will have a major impact on the rural economy.In November 2013, CTA organised an international conference on ICTs for agriculture (ICT4Ag) in Kigali, Rwanda, bringing together young entrepreneurs, farmers' groups, agricultural professionals, policymakers, investors and mobile operators. At the plugand-play day during the conference, both startups and well-established developers showcased their apps. An East Africa-wide hackathon brought together young programmers who competed to produce the best app to solve an agricultural challenge.At the end of this highly successful conference, participants called for increased ICT access in rural areas through better infrastructure, access to devices and energy, and an enabling policy environment. They encouraged app developers to understand farmers' needs and design software in partnership with end-users instead of working alone. To ensure scaling-up and sustainability of ICT4Ag applications, delegates highlighted the need to develop innovative business models.CTA has taken to heart many of these messages and is acting on them by boosting its support to young ICT entrepreneurs, encouraging uptake of ICT solutions for agriculture, and strengthening partnerships across Africa, the Caribbean and Pacific.Director -CTA \" T oday over half of the world's population is affected by some form of malnutrition, be it hunger, micronutrient deficiencies or excessive consumption,\" said José Graziano da Silva, director-general of FAO, recently. Food security is a priority and high on the international agenda, whereas nutrition security does not attract sufficient attention despite figures that highlight the urgency of the situation.Some 2 billion people suffer from micronutrient deficiencies (vitamins, minerals and trace elements). Around a quarter of all children under 5 years old worldwide have stunted growth. An estimated 80% of the 165 million children with this condition live in just 14 countries, half of which are located in ACP regions. Malnutrition is also deadly, causing irreversible damage in children under 2 years of age, with a high economic cost to society. This phenomenon -also known as 'hidden hunger' -is not inevitable, as perfectly illustrated by the success of the Fome Zero (zero hunger) campaign in Brazil.Awareness is growing in the international community, as well as amongst regional bodies, governments, the private sector and civil society. In 2011, the International Food Policy Research Institute placed the question of the relationship between agriculture, nutrition and health (often isolated sectors) on the international agenda at its 2020 Conference held in India. Moreover, in 2013, the International Conference Against Child Undernutrition was organised by UNICEF France, and an initiative coordinated by the UK and Brazil led to the signing of the Global Nutrition for Growth Compact. At the G8 Summit at Lough Erne in Northern Ireland, world leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition while also supporting the UN Global Compact and the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement. Founded in 2010, the SUN Movement brings together governments, civil society and business, with 46 countries currently participating, illustrating the extent to which awareness on malnutrition has been heightened.Malnutrition has multiple causes and is not simply a shortage of food intake. It should be dealt with from a multisectoral standpointhealth, water, sanitation, hygiene, social protection, agriculture, market access, education and gender -and assessed in a coordinated and longterm way. However, until recently, the nutrition issue has mainly been raised in emergency situations and/ or via sectoral programmes focused primarily on health. A paradigm shift is thus needed, with nutrition becoming a fully-fledged objective.Political impetus and governance are essential for effective nutrition policy implementation. The commitment of the Brazilian President Lula da Silva underpins the success of Fome Zero -malnutrition has been reduced by 70% and infant mortality by 47% within 7 years in Brazil. Da Silva made food and nutrition security a political priority in his country, with this programme being nUTriTiOn SeCUriTy\"The right to food cannot be reduced to a right not to starve\", emphasises Olivier de Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food. Until recently, nutrition has been neglected, only being addressed in emergency situations and/or in sector-specific programmes. This issue should now be tackled directly through a multidimensional approach.The number of obese and overweight people has dramatically increased over the last 30 years, with the greatest increases recorded in middle-income and developing countries. One in three adults are now affected, according to the Future Diets report published by the Overseas Development Institute, an independent think tank on humanitarian and development policies. In developing countries, 904 million people are obese, compared to 557 million in developed countries. Globally, more people die from being overweight or obese than from malnourishment.African countries are affected by obesity, but Pacific and Caribbean countries are paying a heavier human and economic price. According to the world Health Organization, over 50% (up to 90% in some cases) of the population is overweight in at least 10 Pacific countries. The numbers are not much better in the Caribbean, where obesity is having a marked health impact.The lack of attention to local food production is the main cause of obesity in both regions, in addition to dependence on high-calorie, lownutrient imported foods -a combination that leads to a situation in which people are overweight yet malnourished.supported by a multistakeholder intersectoral platform, substantial public resources and a set of coordinated programmes.Two African countries hampered by recurrent acute food crises are pioneers in the nutrition policy field. In Ethiopia, malnutrition is responsible for the death of 260,000 children each year. In 2008, Ethiopia adopted a national strategy focused on the most vulnerable groups, with greater coordination between sectors (seven ministries) and stakeholders (UN agencies bilateral donors, research institutions). This has curbed malnutrition and the number of children with growth retardation has been declining at a rate of around 2.5% a year. In addition, the 'Nigeriens Nourish Nigeriens' initiative was launched in Niger, with a High Commissioner assigned to represent it in 2011. The target is to increase production while also enhancing the nutritional quality of meals and ensuring regular market supplies. In the Pacific region, following the 39th Pacific Islands Forum in 2008, a food security framework was set up, included in the Pacific Plan for Strengthening Regional Cooperation and Integration, and further defined during the Pacific Regional Food Summit in 2010.Everyone agrees that only increasing food production and agricultural productivity is not enough to overcome malnutrition. By supporting small farms, income may be generated, in turn providing access to food. The agricultural sector can also bolster better nutrition by promoting traditional local products and sectors that generate products of high nutritional value, such as fruit, vegetables, meat and fish. This will help to diversify and improve the quality of diets, and provide greater access to nutritionally rich foods. In addition, these products could be preserved, stored and processed through the development of value chains. Educating the farming community, especially women, on the nutritional quality of food is also essential. Nutrient supplements may be added further downstream at the processing level. The Flour Fortification Initiative promotes vitamin and mineral supplementation of wheat and maize flour, at an estimated cost of €0.05-0.7/person/ year. Moreover, folic acid-fortified flour reduces neural tube malformations in children. Flour enrichment is now mandatory in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and in 11 Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). Note that 10 of the 15 ECOWAS countries have also made vitamin A enrichment of refined vegetable oils mandatory. Moreover, since 2002, the Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition has been encouraging public-private partnerships to promote access to nutritious food, with the aim of reaching 1 billion people by 2015.This movement is clearly gaining momentum. The road will certainly be rocky and some stakeholders, especially from civil society and bodies like the Right to Food and Nutrition Watch, have issued some criticism: lack of transparency, potential conflicts of interest, and genetic modification. This criticism is focused especially on the involvement of the private sector and its 'hidden' intention to capture new markets. Africa is addressing this issue by developing its own nutrition research initiatives.■ The Purchase from Africans for Africa project, currently being trialled in Ethiopia, Malawi, Mozambique, Niger and Senegal by the World Food Programme (WFP), works by supplying school canteens with food bought from local small-scale African farmers. \"Considering the positive results, this project is in the process of being renewed and strengthened,\" WFP's Niamey office has stated.The pilot phase involved 424 schools and 120,000 pupils, throughout the five selected countries. \"In Niger, the project covered about 90 of the 700 primary schools that receive food from WFP, and some 500 small rural farmers profited from direct purchases,\" emphasises WFP. This initiative, jointly led with FAO and other partners, aims to fight hunger and malnutrition, improve farmers' incomes and keep children in school in the long-term.The African Plant Breeding Academy was opened in December 2013 in Nairobi by the African Orphan Crops Consortium to improve the livelihoods of small-scale farmers, reduce hunger and boost Africa's food supply. The Academy will use the latest scientific techniques to genetically sequence, assemble and annotate the genomes of 100 traditional African crops to guide the development of more robust crop products, with higher nutritional content, resilience and yields. The Academy will also train 250 plant breeders and technicians in genomics and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement over 5 years. The first crop to be sequenced will be baobab.A new drought tolerant variety of maize, we1101 or 'drought Tego', which was initially developed under the water efficient Maize for Africa project, has been shown to have some tolerance to Maize lethal necrosis disease (Mlnd), which can devastate crops. in 2012, in Kenya, farmers suffered losses amounting to about €17 million after Mlnd affected 26,000 ha. wATerBy using a low-cost, improved water pump, more than 220,000 small-scale farmers in 20 African countries are earning at least US$700 extra per year due to increased productivity and lower costs of accessing water. Known as the Money Maker, the pump is able to draw water from a depth of seven metres and costs around €50. KickStart international, who developed the pump, is currently testing a solar voltaic version, due for release in Kenya by 2015.To reach rice self-sufficiency by 2016, Côte d'Ivoire's government is focusing on developing the private sector, improving hydroagricultural management and supplying selected seeds and mentoring to farmers. This policy lies fully within the Economic Community of West African States' regional strategy for the sustainable revival of rice production in the region. Côte d'Ivoire aims to produce 1.9 Mt of rice by 2016 up from 1.3 Mt in 2013 and 700,000 t in 2010. According to the office national pour le développement de la riziculture, the public agency for rice growing development, rice imports have already decreased by 30% between 2012 and 2013.■ Farmers in Garoua, in northern Cameroon, are achieving higher yields of cassava after adopting disease-resistant and drought-tolerant varieties. Extension workers and research officers from the Ministry of Agriculture have also taught the farmers how to cross-pollinate root and tuber plants to produce higher yielding plant material. \"It was common to experience chronic food shortages due to drought or disease,\" explains cassava farmer Bouba Achile. \"But the new plants consistently provide us with a much better harvest every year.\" In 2010, Achile was given 100 kg of improved stem cuttings from which he was able to harvest 800 kg. To transform the agricultural sector, the government of Cameroon has been investing in improved, higher-quality, higher-yielding maize, wheat and cassava varieties as a strategy to raise the productivity of smallholder farmers and improve their livelihoods.■ Smallholder cassava farmers in Nigeria are benefiting from an increased demand for cassava chips and flour for domestic use and export. In an effort to curb the wheat import bill, the government has implemented a policy that forces foreign retailers -such as Spar which operates supermarkets in the country -to use 20% locally produced cassava flour and 80% wheat flour in the production of bread, cakes, doughnuts and other confectionaries. Due to the increasing demand, commercial banks are becoming more willing to offer finance to cassava flours, and farmers are increasing the area they devote to cassava production.In 2012 the Nigerian government increased effective duty on wheat in order to make locally produced cassava flour more competitive. More than 750 master bakers have been trained in cassava bread production to develop the cassava industry, create jobs and boost incomes. The federal government has estimated that the annual wheat importation bill will be cut by 20%, around €500 million. The government has announced plans to increase the percentage of cassava flour blended with wheat flour to 40% by 2015.Large-scale project yields results in 2012, Cameroon's Ministry of Agriculture and rural development introduced large-scale maize production, dubbed 'Corn Agropole', in the Upper Sanaga region to improve food security. with 3,000 ha of land and hybrid maize seeds from the institute for research and Agricultural development, 2,770 t of maize was produced in 2013, compared to 765 t in 2011.An organic farming school has been established in Mauritius. Open to young people between 14-18 years who have dropped out of the conventional education system, the school provides academic courses in a classroom called 'eco-School', that are followed by practical lessons in the fields of the 'rural family house' adjoining the classroom. The school aims to facilitate the social and vocational integration of these young people.Growing perennial crops such as coffee and cocoa in the shade of trees taller than 25 m is profitable. In Côte d'Ivoire, researchers from the French research centre CIRAD, the Centre national de recherche agronomique -Côte d'Ivoire's national research agency -and the natural rubber company Hévégo, carried out a 17 year trial to measure inputs and labour costs as well as productivity of hevea (rubber) grown with and without perennial crops in southwestern Côte d'Ivoire. The cumulative yields generated by intercropping hevea with perennial crops provide an overall production increase of 17 to 21% compared to hevea monoculture. This kind of intercropping also helps to reduce competition for land use and diversifies farmers' incomes.■ A young Nigerian inventor, Abdou Maman, has developed a remote irrigation system that enables farmers to expand their irrigable areas, save water and attend to other activities during watering. The system is solar-powered and activated with a cell phone: by dialling a specific number, farmers can remotely water their crops for a timed period. \"The system also enables remote watering of animals, provides meteorological and hydrological information, and filters water and stores it in tanks for human consumption,\" Maman explains. \"The watering period depends on the cultivated area. Once plants have received the right amount of water, the mechanism automatically stops.\" Patented by the World Intellectual Property Organization, the innovation is generating significant interest among farmers who are using it to expand crop areas and increase yields.To improve communication with producers, Intercoton -the cotton association in Côte d'Ivoire -has just signed a partnership with 10 community radio stations broadcasting in the cotton basin. Information about the sector's activities, including extension information on best practices to help cotton growers improve their incomes, will be aired, in French, Malinké and Sénoufo.In Burkina Faso, Chad, Ghana, Guinea, Mali and Senegal, researchers are now able to rely on various strategies to control tsetse fly, the vector of animal African trypanosomiasis. Adjusted for each country, the tailored strategies reduce the flies' impact by 80 to 98% in some areas. Senegal has opted for eradication by trapping flies, treating the cattle with insecticide and airdropping sterile male flies in order to reduce the tsetse population. Ghana is using a sequential aerial spraying technique, and Chad has chosen to treat cattle with footbaths.A community project to support climate change adaptation in isiolo county, Kenya, is being replicated in four more counties (29% of the nation). Projects identified by communities for funding include a livestock disease laboratory in Kinna, establishment of local agreements to strengthen the dedha system of rotating grazing lands, and managing access to dry season water.Educational training materials information on poultry keeping for training technical staff has been made available in a series of 13 education videos produced by FAO. Topics include income generation and gender equality, information on poultry nutrition and feeding in different production systems, and poultry health and disease control. The videos are available at: http://tinyurl.com/lozyl5z wOMenFrom just 40 members in 2007, the TRY Women's Oyster Association in The Gambia has grown to over 500 members from 15 communities and has become the first women's group in Africa to be given exclusive use rights of a coastal fishery, under a co-management plan. The women have established an annual 8 month closure period to prevent overfishing and protect mangrove habitats: between March and June they harvest wild shellfish beds, but the oysters are larger, due to the closure period, and fetch higher prices per kilo. The women have also received training in sanitary handling and processing methods, aquaculture and business management.■ The productivity of the Fulani Ecotype, an indigenous chicken kept by the Fulani tribe in northern Nigeria, has been improved through cross-breeding with the Hubbard Broiler, a bird of European descent with high productivity in meat production, and the Dominant Black, a bird of American descent prolific in egg production. Egg production is over 10% higher in the crossbred Fulani Ecotype than the traditional breed. Broiler weight is also slightly higher in the crossed variety, which has a better survival rate in the face of environmental and disease pressures than imported breeds, being adapted to local conditions. About one-in-four farmers are raising the crossbred Fulani Ecotype broiler chicken but most large commercial farmers still depend heavily on imported breeds as layers, despite their high mortality rate, as other varieties are not available. As these crossbreeds become more widespread, researchers are convinced that they will reduce foreign exchange spent on importation of parent stock.■ The 'Daral' project, launched at the end of January 2014 in Passy, Senegal, aims to help farmers combat cattle rustling and diseases affecting their livestock. As a result of cooperation between Coders4Africa, Microsoft, the Senegalese Government and civil society actors, Daral is an application consisting of a web and an SMS platform, linked to a centralised database. The web interface enables the application to collect and display data about farmers and their livestock while the SMS interface allows farmers to interact with vets and local extension officers in case of an epidemiological threat or cattle theft. Daral also enables animals to be identified and tracked, which will help to improve livestock statistics. The project's pilot phase is running in the Fatick region and in some parts of the Kaolack region. It intends to reach nearly 8,000 farmers who own more than 10 animals, and 15,000 small farmers who own less than 10 animals.Use of improved varieties of nitrogen-fixing legumes (soybean, cowpea, groundnut and common bean) and rhizobia inoculants, phosphorus fertilisers and improved crop management practices, is able to more than double legume yields and improve the performance of successive crops by as much as 50%, as a result of higher nitrogen levels in the soil. Legumes harvest nitrogen from the atmosphere through a symbiosis with rhizobium, a nitrogen-fixing bacteria found naturally in soil, thereby improving soil health and the overall productivity of the farming system. Since 2009, more than 250,000 smallholder farmers across eight African countries have been provided with better genotypes of legumes by N2Africa.■ In Rwanda, digital and satellite technology is being used to provide early warning climate and crop husbandry information, including about pests and diseases, to help farmers improve yields. Weather Safe Ltd, in partnership with the European Space Agency, is combining local weather monitoring, agronomic data modelling and high resolution satellite data to provide vital information to farmers through an easy-to-use internet and mobile service. \"Farmers need not only equipment, but also information about variations in weather patterns, markets, soil fertility and texture as well as topography,\" says David Mills, director of Weather Safe Rwanda. Initially this information is only being provided to coffee farmers, as part of a pilot project. Meanwhile agricultural agronomists have been receiving training in satellite and digital data science. Smart weather data, enabling precision monitoring of farming activities, was showcased at the CTA/Minagri 2013 ICT4Ag conference, held in Kigali.eArly wArninG■ A new study by scientists from the French research institute, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD), and partners indicates that cotton productivity in Cameroon could significantly improve by 2050, in contrast to other crops that will be affected by climate change. The projections, made in line with six climate scenarios, suggest that with increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), yields will also increase, as higher levels of CO 2 stimulate cotton production. Scientists predict that annual yields could increase by up to 30 kg per ha.Adoption of conservation agriculture practices has also been shown to give promising results for cotton in the country. Over the last decade, many farmers in Cameroon have adopted conservation farming techniques including sowing under plant cover, minimum tillage and mulching. The IRD researchers state that these farming practices limit the deterioration of cultivated soils and counteract the effects of climate change on crops. However, excess rainfall under a changing climate could still threaten cotton production, with increased runoff removing valuable topsoil and inputs.In 2005, Madagascar launched the Rural Income Promotion Programme and distributed around 1.4 million clove, lychee and coffee seedlings and other agroforestry and fruit species to more than 12,000 farmer households on the island's eastern coast. These seedlings are starting to bear fruit. With these new plantations, farmers who were growing food crops are diversifying their activities and generating additional income. Furthermore, the trees help to protect watersheds and restore soil.An early maturing, drought-resilient sorghum variety (Gadam) is proving particularly popular with red-billed quelea birds in eastern Kenya. with the birds moving in large flocks, the crop is eaten before it is harvested. Farmers are using bird scarers and reflective Cds to reduce losses, whilst Kenyan researchers aim to produce a cross-bred variety less prone to being eaten.native to west Africa, nigerian teak (iroko) trees act as long-term carbon sinks. Scientists have found that when iroko is grown in dry, acidic soil and treated with microbes, carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere and combined with calcium in the soil to produce soil-enriching limestone. Other African trees also produce limestone, but iroko was found to be the most efficient.Developed by researchers from the University of Colorado and the Mobile Assay company, Lab-on-Mobile-Device (LMD) is a smartphone application that detects aflatoxins. Fast -you just have to take a picture -and affordable, each test costs about US$2-3 (€1.5-2.2) against at least US$15 (€11) per laboratory test. The application provides farmers, wherever they are, with a reliable and accurate diagnosis. LMD determines the level of aflatoxin contamination by analysing the shades of the coloured bands on test strips photographed by users. Field trials of LMD began in five locations in Eastern Africa in September 2013.Research in Malawi has revealed that 'clarifier mud', a by-product of sugar molasses, is an effective organic fertiliser, boosting soil fertility and maize yields. When processing sugar cane, a clarifier is used to remove solid particles from liquids; clear juice is extracted at the top and settled mud is removed from the bottom. This mud has a silt clay loam texture, a similar chemical composition to peat, and is rich in nitrogen, magnesium and potassium. Farmers in the sugar producing district of Nkhotakota are now exploiting clarifier mud, which is readily available from Ethanol Company Malawi Limited.■ Mauritian researchers are working to ensure that nothing is wasted from sugarcane. After removing juice, sugar, molasses, vinasse, ethanol and bagasse, the researchers have developed a method to obtain bio-plastic made from the leaves, which have previously been used as fodder for cattle or litter in cowsheds. With livestock farming on the island becoming increasingly rare, hundreds of thousands of tonnes of leaves are now left in fields.Researchers from the Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute (MSIRI) succeeded in converting these sugarcane wastes into a plant-based plastic, polyhydroxyalkanoate, commonly called bio-or agro-plastic. This material can be used for the production of various items such as bottles, disposable tableware, pens, razors or bags, explains Salem Saumtally, director of MSIRI. The production cost of bio-plastic is still higher than petrochemical-based plastic. But, because of the banning of traditional plastic bags, agro-plastic from cane leaves hold potential for the future as it degrades in a few weeks and can be turned into fertiliser.■ The best way to fight the fruit fly, one of the major predators of several varieties of fruits, is with a wide range of biological control methods of which the African weaver ant (Oecophylla longinoda) has been proved to be the most effective. Weaver ants live in tropical forests in complex colonies, forming highly organised societies like bees. A distinctive feature of these ants is that they eliminate any intruder on their territory by developing strategies to hunt and catch insects from the foliage or on the ground at the foot of the tree. They also release pheromones that repulse fruit flies. These are the results of the West African Fruit Fly Initiative, a regional project to control the mango fruit fly, jointly launched in 2008 by the French research centre, CIRAD, and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. Beside predation and repulsion, weaver ants have other advantages. They protect fruit trees against various pests, such as hemipterans (bugs), repulse flying fox bats and improve fruit quality as their presence in the tree increases sugar content and reduces acidity.African scientist wins award dr Abdoulaye diabate, from Burkina Faso, has won an award from the UK's royal Society for his research on mosquito mating behaviour. he has discovered that mosquito swarms use distinctive landmarks to gather and mate, offering a potential solution to target them and also accurately estimate several key parameters that are involved in malaria transmission.Made of a grinder, a mill and a churn, the 'Alafia complex' -developed by the institut national de recherches agricoles du Bénin, Benin's agricultural research centre -facilitates shea processing, which is predominantly conducted by women. it improves productivity and reduces the arduousness of this work. But its cost, at more than CFA 1 million (€1,500), is considered to be rather expensive.FrUiT FlyBUSInESS AnD TRADEAs part of the World Cocoa Foundation Cocoa Livelihood Programme, the microfinance institution, Advans Côte d'Ivoire, has been offering a financial service adapted to small cocoa enterprises since 2012. With the 'cocoa credit', cooperatives and farmers can obtain -under specific conditions -a one-year sum of CFA 1 to 50 million (€1,500-7,600) in order to purchase fertilisers and crop protection products.Repayments are made through deductions on cocoa deliveries, agreed with the exporter. Since 2012, more than 3,700 Ivorian producers have benefited from this credit. Advans intends to further develop this system within the country and across all cocoa exporting countries in West Africa.Heilala Vanilla, a Tongan vanilla producer, is fast becoming a premium brand in Japan, the latest destination for its export of vanilla beans and other products including vanilla extract, paste, sugar and syrup. With its own plantation in Tonga, in partnership with the local community, all the processing (including curing of green beans), marketing and distribution is conducted at the company base in Tauranga, New Zealand. With assistance from the Increasing Agricultural Commodity Trade project, funded by the European Union and implemented by the Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Heilala Vanilla has been able to achieve organic certification, purchase specialised equipment and gain expertise in the use of best practices.According to new figures released by Jamaica's Cocoa industry Board, cocoa production on the island has increased by over 100%, with 476 t produced during 2011/12, valued at US$150 million (€110 million), compared to 216 t in 2010/11. The boost is attributed to eU investment in capacity building and infrastructure. Around 7,000 farmers are engaged in cocoa production on 3,500 ha. wOOdThe société nationale des bois du Gabon (SnBG) has set up its third processing plant for veneer and plywood production. in response to a government decision in late 2009 to ban logs exports in order to promote local value added production, SnBG proposed a development plan in 2010. Two years later, two plants were opened, one to produce sawn timber and the other for production of veneer.■ The world's largest fairtrade system is scaling up: Fairtrade International has introduced the Fairtrade Sourcing Program (FSP), a new labelling model to give small farmers opportunities to sell more. FSP works by enabling a company to source one or more Fairtrade commodities rather than focusing on all the ingredients for one product, e.g. the cocoa for a chocolate bar but not the sugar and the milk. A new symbol identifies FSP products.Only 1.2% of the cocoa in the world is presently sold on Fairtrade terms. FSP will increase Fairtrade cocoa sales by 14% (about 6,000 t). According to the Max Havelaar Foundation, this means farmers will benefit from an additional US$1.2 million (€876,000) in development premiums. Nine companies, including Mars, and German, Swiss and Japanese distributors have already signed FSP agreements for cocoa, cotton and sugar. ■ As part of the 'Growth for Uganda' project, launched in April 2013 to improve the productivity of small producers, the German company K+S KALI GmbH and the NGO Sasakawa Africa Association have set up the Mobile Farmer's Training Centre. This mobile training facility, equipped with a soil testing laboratory, will be able to reach the remotest villages and communities affected by poor road systems and harsh weather conditions. The facility will train farmers on various topics, from plant nutrition to marketing, and will sensitise them on the need to improve and maintain soil fertility.During a first phase (April-August 2013), Growth for Uganda trained 10,000 small producers in the Dokolo and Apac districts. The second phase, running until mid-2014, intends to train another 10,000 farmers, and about 50,000 producers should be reached within the next 5 years.What do you see as the key challenges for the fisheries sector in the next decade?The issue of conservation is of increasingly serious concern to fisherfolk and their livelihoods. In the last few decades, specific agendas have been developed that relate to conservation. My personal view is that some of these are directly related to the corporate structure of business in the global economy. These agendas, directly or indirectly, create stumbling blocks to fisherfolk. For instance, if the agenda for a conservation organisation is to push for marine protected areas, restricted fishing or individual quotas, they are actually limiting the space or resources that fisherfolk are able to access. And while these agendas may be based on scientific research, fisherfolk, who are in the ocean for much longer periods than researchers, sometimes have different observations.The challenge here is learning how we can work with the scientific community to find a balance between conservation and sustainable utilisation of fisheries resources. We (our network) firmly believe that Caribbean countries should benefit optimally from their resources, whether for poverty eradication or long-term economic development.How are ICTs changing the ways in which information is shared with small-scale fishers?At the moment, our network relies exclusively on ICTs, including the internet, skype and the go2meeting service, in order to communicate and collaborate with our many partners. These are useful technologies for our geographically dispersed Caribbean region. In partnership with the University of the West Indies, we have also expanded the 'mFisheries' (mobile fisheries) concept, a one-stop information shop. This comprises an innovative bundle of mobile and web applications developed for small-scale fisherfolk, processors, retailers, wholesalers and consumers. Information is used by fisherfolk, for instance, to plan fishing trips, mark fishing sites, obtain market prices and weather forecasts, and share knowledge amongst the fishing community. MFisheries2 is currently being developed to meet the regional demands within the sector.How can the sector become more market-oriented but maintain environmental sustainability?The common fisheries policy focuses on a market-oriented approach, which means there is scope within the policy to have some significant collaboration between government, international entities, fisherfolk and their organisations to actually develop and access markets, both regionally and internationally. However, regional trade issues are the most pertinent. Internationally, we are non-competitive due to economies of scale whereas there is significant potential for regional fisheries trade. Lastly, factors such as certification and standards act as trade barriers to small scale fisherfolk, even though they may be sustainably providing products. The policy does not specifically address this issue, which is a contributing deterrent to international trade.In addition, the fisheries policy consists of guidelines that are fairly general. The policy, once formerly adopted by the heads of states can be used as a tool by fishermen to advocate for greater participation in governance issues as well as to point governments toward their own objectives in terms of marketing and particularly inter-regional trade.Regarding sustainability, we need an ecosystems approach, so that fisherfolk are conscious of how they fish and how they can lessen their impact on fish habitat. Such an effort involves research, including collaboration between researchers and fisherfolk. Once this collaboration occurs, relevant information can be generated, such as the extent of the resource base, its diversity and how fisherfolk can best access this diversity to benefit their economic welfare in the long-term.Although I am not familiar with other regions, I agree that sharing lessons, experiences and challenges can be beneficial to others. However, as we live in different cultures, we should not expect that even if we copy these lessons, we will definitely have the same outcomes.Mitchell Lay is coordinator of the Caribbean Network of Fisherfolk Organisations (CNFO), which was created under the Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism to increase the capacity and influence of fishing communities in managing fisheries resources.Across the Caribbean, the fisheries sector directly and indirectly employs over 182,000 people. Small-scale fisheries are vital for local employment, as well as ensuring food security and good nutrition. However, there is a need for fisherfolk to be better informed and involved in fisheries policy and governance.Buoyed by advances in ICT, a 'digital revolution' is creating a renaissance in developing countries' agricultural value chain systems. This dramatic development was at the heart of discussions held during the ICT4Ag conference, organised by CTA and Rwanda's Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources in Kigali in November 2013. The following dossier features articles written by winners of the ICT4Ag media competition. n ACP countries agriculture is the key economic player, employing between 40-60% of populations and contributing between 25-45% of gross domestic product,\" explained Michael Hailu, CTA director at the start of the ICT4Ag conference. Traditionally the sector has been characterised by highly impoverished farmers using old-fashioned farming techniques resulting in low productivity levels. With no choice but to deal with exploitative middlemen, the sector has always been vulnerable to famine and food insecurity. But now, \"ICTs are creating a revolution; all the way from extension to marketing, to agro-input services, to banking and financial services, to certification management,\" says Agnes Kalibata, Rwanda's Minister of Agriculture and Animal Resources.In 1971, Alan Kay, an American computer scientist said, \"The best way to predict the future is to invent it.\" This exemplifies the proliferation of agricultural applications supported by web, mobile and radio platforms. These apps empower farmers in developing countries by providing them with advance price information for different produce, or by predicting weather or disease patterns for early preparedness. Farmers now have access to information on agricultural production at their fingertips.Hailu explains that these applications \"provide farmers with timely advice and information, enable them to increase productivity, access markets to become efficient, and increase incomes along the value chain.\" It is also important to remember that smallholder farmers, mostly women, produce 80% of the food in Africa. However, they face many challenges including low productivity, high energy and fertiliser prices, lack of access to credit, and poor or nonexistent extension advisory services. \"One cannot over emphasise the importance of agriculture in achieving food and nutritional security and prosperity in ACP countries, as well as in much of the developing world,\" emphasises Hailu. of the value chain in ACP countries. Some of the apps showcased included mFarm and iCow from Kenya, Kinu from Tanzania, Esoko from Ghana, Farmerline from Nigeria, mFisheries from Trinidad and Tobago, Trac FM from Uganda, Rural eMarket from Madagascar, and AGRICO from Burkina Faso, among others. mFarm, uses simple data to 'mPower' farmers, says co-founder Susan Oguya. She argues that mFarm has created 'armchair farmers' and has attracted youth to the sector as producers, marketers, input suppliers and content developers.Esoko, an application enabling farmers to access market prices, weather forecasts, agricultural tips, and offers for their produce, has over 2.5 million users across 16 African countries (Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe). \"The purpose of the application is to put more money in smallholder farmers' pockets,\" says Mark Davies, Esoko's chief executive, adding that app usage For several years, CTA has been proud to host a media competition for ACP journalists in order to boost the quality of coverage of agricultural and rural development issues. The 2013 competition was launched under the theme \"Information and Communications Technologies for Agriculture -ICT4Ag\" and was open to print and online journalists who could best investigate the challenges and opportunities involved in using ICTs for agriculture. The aim of the competition was to raise awareness and showcase the best ICT practices that could be scaled-up and replicated for agricultural transformation in all ACP regions.Over 120 entries were reviewed by a panel of English and French international judges. From these, six semifinalists were selected to attend the ICT4Ag conference and participate in a master class for journalists delivered by Dr. Maria Protz, chief international judge for the competition. Using these skills, they were then expected to cover the meeting's events and submit four additional pieces for the judges' consideration. It was a close competition, but this special Spore dossier features the winning stories of the top three finalists. They include: • Joshua Masinde (see picture), 1st place winner, originally from Uganda and now working as a business and economic affairs journalist for the Daily Nation, the leading newspaper in East and Central Africa.• Second place winner, Arison Mbuli Tamfu, from Cameroon, is the African Correspondent for the MALAYSIA MSME News Network, an online news portal. He also serves as editor for Cameroon Daily Journal -an online publication based in the US. • CTA's 3rd place winner, Fidelis Zvomuya, from Zimbabwe, has worked for several media houses worldwide. Currently, Fidelis is a climate change, agriculture and environmental journalist and editor at Agriconnect Communication Media. He is also the founding editor of Africa Green Media.CTA is proud to share their stories in this edition of Spore. has seen returns for many smallholders increase by between 10-15% annually. \"Some have gained as much as 500% in returns on improved prices,\" he states.Rural eMarket, besides offering information on prices, productivity, and market access, also offers farmers information on how to access financial services. \"Farmers can sell their produce, view other people's offers, view demands or requests, update demand requests, and view which products are available in which markets and at what prices. Farmers are also able to search for financial services, especially in microfinance,\" says Andrianjafy Rasoanindrainy, Rural eMarket's project coordinator.\"ICTs have made it easy for people to facilitate new ways of cooperation and co-create new innovations among stakeholders,\" argues Paul Cunningham, IST Africa Initiative's co-founder. Many other applications are creating global networks of farmers to share ideas and information by way of videos, pictures or text towards sustainable agriculture and rural development. For example, in December 2013, Access Agriculture, an international NGO, unveiled a network of YouTube farmers through its AgTube application to help farmers interact with each other by uploading videos for sharing with the agricultural community.In South Sudan, the government's efforts to woo warring agro-pastoralist communities by advocating adoption of smart farming techniques could bring lasting peace in a country that has been scarred by decades of war. For instance, in Warrap State (one of 10 states), cattle rustling is a serious threat to the socio-economic activities of communities. But planned introduction of mobile cinemas for display in different parts of the state could support agricultural initiatives. The rollout of ojoVoz, a mobile and web application allowing farmers to send voice recording and images using their phones to the internet, is part of the strategy to add value to agricultural initiatives. The app also helps to map water points, which are usually hotspots of conflicts by warring clans. \"Smartphones are also to be issued to cattle camp and state leaders as part of an initiative to encourage people into the agricultural value chain,\" says Eva Yayi, IT officer at Community Empowerment for Progress in South Sudan.In Kenya, there are around 25 agricultural applications listed by the Ministry of Agriculture that offer credible information and act as extension services, to provide information to farmers who have access to mobile phones even in very remote areas of the country. Some farmers have even created a network of young Facebook farmers as a market place of ideas and transactions.\"With rapidly increasing mobile phone coverage and internet connectivity, the transformative potential of ICTs can be particularly harnessed in the agricultural DOSSIER V ie w p o in t sector to reach smallholder farmers, particularly in rural areas, while reducing transaction costs,\" says Michael Ryan, the European Union ambassador to Rwanda. This presents a good opportunity, especially for the youth to get back into the agricultural value chain rather than migrating from rural to urban areas in search of elusive white collar jobs.The rural-urban migration of youth is a major problem across ACP countries, but ICTs play a key role in stemming this trend by creating employment opportunities and also improving quality of life in rural areas. Broadband connectivity and access to mobile phones not only presents a significant opportunity for increasing agricultural productivity, even in remote villages, but also by luring the youth back to farms.CTA's Agricultural Rural Development and Youth in the Information Society project is helping to promote ICT use among rural youth. Since its launch in 2010, the initiative has had a major impact on information-sharing, building capacity in all aspects of ICT innovation and entrepreneurship in agriculture.The ICT4Ag event drew close to 500 participants from several sectors including government, the private sector, the NGO community, intergovernmental bodies, and development agencies from 66 countries. Young people from Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda also participated in an Agri-Hackathon Championship to develop ICT applications addressing specific needs in the agricultural ecosystem.Some of the apps are tailored to run on mobile and web platforms to increase access to finance, connect and harmonise stakeholders in agriculture, enhance farmers' creditworthiness, collect and share market price data, and connect and harmonise key youth stakeholders along the agricultural value chain. Eastern Africa has, for instance, become increasingly connected to the internet: 75% of Kenya's population has access to a mobile phone and the number of internet users stands at slightly over 12% of a population of 40 million people as of June 2012, according to Internet World Stats.The Rwandan government is particularly keen to boost its agricultural sector from an annual growth of 5.5% to 8.5% in 5 years through investments in ICTs. \"We would like to create 200,000 jobs every year off the farm. That will not happen without ICTs,\" says Valentine Rugwabiza, chief executive officer of Rwanda Development Board.Despite the existence of abundant land, water and cheap labour African countries still spend around €36 billion importing food annually. \"To achieve its full potential, smallholder agriculture must be transformed from a subsistence activity to a profitable sustainable business, and clearly, ICTs can play a key role in this transformation,\" concludes Hailu. The ICT4Ag 2013 conference showcased this emerging reality.Joshua Masinde, 1st place winner Susan Kahumbu Stephanou is Green Dreams CEO and creative director. Having seen the information gap and high risks involved in the dairy sector, she launched iCow, a mobile-based application in 2011.ICT penetration in Africa has grown significantly. Women are among the highest users of the iCow application; they make up more than 70% of our 25,000 plus subscribers. They use it to manage their farms and increase their yields. But a gender digital divide still exists, along with some profound problems preventing women from benefiting from ICTs. Some of Africa's rural women still lack basic needs, and have other economic hardships related to HIV/AIDS as well as tuberculosis in their family. Some women are subjected to human rights abuses and domestic violence. When their physical needs are met, rural women are satisfied. ICTenabled development projects will provide more opportunities for African rural women.ICTs have the potential to develop rural women. In Africa, women are not only farmers but they are also mothers and housekeepers. ICTs can help them manage their multiple roles and make it easier for them to travel and attend meetings. ICTs catalyse and accelerate organisational development for women farmers; obtaining market information enhances their negotiation skills with local traders, businesses and other value chain players. ICTs not only improve the status of women farmers who use them, they also enhance the status of the farming sector in general.Farmers dial a short code and are able to access a simple menu that guides them on how to subscribe to various products. After subscribing, the system begins to send farmers SMSs at intervals depending on the product of choice. The iCow application allows users to receive text messages about livestock breeding and production patterns. Those registered on the platform say milk yields have gone up as a result and they have noticed improved herd health. On average, farmers receive three SMSs per week at a cost of €0.24 each.We have seen that most women who use iCow want to access the best market prices, keep their records, find products in high demand, get information on animal health and disease control, as well as receive information on new farming practices and agricultural technologies.Fidelis Zvomuya, 3rd place winner DOSSIER ICTs are definitely a 'game changer' in how agricultural production is now being negotiated. Traditional bargaining relationships in the value chain no longer apply. ICTs are mixing up who buys and sells from whom and at what price. In this transforming market place, ICTs will eventually help everyone compete. I n the remote Bokwaogo locality in Buea on the eastern slopes of Mount Cameroon, Mama Mologan Francisca battles with the soil, hurrying to meet weather deadlines for her maize and tea farm. She proudly owns land extending beyond half a hectare.\"This is my bread and butter. This is my life,\" Mologan says. However, her journey has not been an easy one. In early 2001, she was a rich woman buying farm produce cheaply from farmers in the south-west region of Cameroon and supplying them with badly-needed sprayers, pesticides and improved seed at premium prices. \"It fetched me much money,\" she says. But the introduction of mobile phones shattered the profitable business leaving her in misery.\"Ma Mojoko came and taught the women how to use the mobile phones to know the real prices of pesticides and food crops on the market. After knowing the actual rePOrT FrOM CAMerOOn prices, they refused to deal with me, preferring to wait for buyers to come from Douala city and buy. I lost everything and my business crumpled,\" laments Mologan. Ma Mojoko is Catherine Mojoko Molua, founder and president of Walana Wa Makwasi (women in action), a grassroots organisation founded in 2001 to boost the agricultural and technological skills of smallholder farmers in the southwest region of Cameroon. She presented her project at the ICT4Ag Conference in Kigali, Rwanda. \"The magic here is the mobile phone. We taught the smallholder farmers how to make a call and how to send an SMS in order to get vital information in real time. For the very first time, they were able to get information relating to planting seasons, know when and how to apply the right quantity of fertiliser, and very importantly how to bargain with buyers,\" explains Mojoko.The ICT4Ag conference was a milestone for organisations like Walana Wa Makwasi, permitting them not only to share their experiences but also learn from others and seek partnership with founders of similar ideas such as Rural eMarket in Madagascar. This is a webapplication that allows subscribed farmers and buyers to send and request information on prices and farm produce. \"The mobile app gives the farmer just what he or she requires,\" says Andrianjafy Rasoanindrainy, Rural eMarket project coordinator.TRAC FM, an innovative software platform used by media and non-profit organisations, also allows users to amplify the voices of citizens, track reports, collect opinions and provide real time data. \"So you can use the service delivery system to take informed action,\" says Bart Sullivan of Farm Radio International.\"ICTs could transform rural agriculture,\" adds Mojoko, who was looking for partnerships with innovators at the conference. Generally, the innovations presented were testimony to the importance that mobile apps play in boosting agriculture in rural areas of ACP countries. They are especially important in Africa where it is estimated that 1 billion people will have access to a mobile phone by 2016.However, other experts are concerned about its effectiveness. \"The mobile can help raise awareness and create commitment but, to really make the change at farm level, the best approach is still hands-on extension field workers because it is difficult to teach farmers how to plant or harvest through radio or text message,\" says Raf Somers of the Belgian Development Agency, BTC, in Rwanda. It is also unfortunate that despite the growing interest of African rural farmers in ICTs, they are still handicapped by illiteracy. A problem that, Mojoko states, \"needs to be redressed urgently by sending coordinators to teach them.\"Maximo Torero of the International Food Policy Research Institute regretted that, in spite of the scramble for the mobile phone, penetration in rural Africa is still below 50%. \"And in terms of broadband, which I think is the technology we need to move forward, the penetration is extremely low. Governments should focus on ways of increasing access to broadband in Africa,\" Torero strongly recommends.Until then, the mobile phone still makes things awkward for the middlemen in Africa. ICTs have reduced them to subjects and raised farmers to kings. Mologan was smart enough to realise this and quickly adapted to the potential of ICTs. \"After the initial difficulty, I decided to start farming and joined the Walana Wa Makwasi group. I was taught how to use the mobile phone to facilitate my farming. And today, after using the mobile phone to increase produce for 11 years, I live well. I was dead and now I am alive,\" she says.Arison Mbuli Tamfu, 2nd place winner T rucks loaded with logs leaving the Congo Basin rainforest, heading towards ports and leaving behind devastated landscapes is a more or less legitimate image that is firmly anchored in the public imagination. Indeed, in recent decades, remarkable progress has been achieved in almost all countries to not only operate more sustainably and strengthen legal logging in forests but also increase the added value of the timber. \"Over the last 20 years we have devoted our energy to forest management and certification, but in the Congo the next 20 years will be focused on more advanced and diversified wood processing, a key economic component of sustainable forest management,\" said Henri Djombo, the Congolese Minister of Forest Economy and Sustainable Development, at the Racewood Forum in Brazzaville in October 2013.Roughly two timber sectors coexist in the Congo Basin -one oriented towards export and the other towards local and regional markets. The first primarily supplies logs, but the supply of primary processed wood products (sawn wood, veneer and plywood) is also developing. This is the case in Gabon, in particular, which in 2010 was the first state in the region to impose a total ban on log exports to encourage the emergence of a local wood industry.In addition to the trend for industrial wood processing driven by local legislation, certification processes -essential for opening the door to major world markets -are being developed. While the practice is becoming more widespread, no importing countries currently require that only certified timber enters its market. Howewer in the United States under the amended Lacey Act or in the European Union under the EU Timber Regulation of March 2013, any operator using wood or wood products must be ready, if necessary, to prove that the wood was legally logged and exported. Certified wood (Forest Stewardship Council, PEFC) is proof of legality. The certification process is thus being applied throughout the chain, from logging to wood processing.The second sector devoted to wood products for local or regional markets is primarily informal. Production is often of poor quality but this sector can still compete with the fledgling formal sector due to low prices. In Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of Congo, for instance, the price of timber sawn by villagers may be 20% lower than that of professional sawyers. \"Eighty percent of my clients are French companies operating in Gabon. They come to me for high quality products and they go to the 'neighbourhood' (i.e. informal craftspeople) for anything else because it's cheaper,\" explains Daniel Charles, head of Art et Technique du Bois, a cabinetry company in Libreville.The local sector is also beginning to feel the effects of a more favourable climate. Purchasing power is rising in Africa despite the decline in international tropical timber demand due to the economic crisis, fashion trends and increasing legal requirements of importing countries. A small but growing number of operators in the formal sector are focusing on local markets. In the collective mind, wooden houses are for the poor, but people are beginning to see that wood is chic too. In 2011, Djombo organised a show of model houses built with local wood in the Côte Sauvage beach area near Brazzaville, while in Gabon companies like Ecowood build 'ecohouses'.The informal sector now needs structuring. In Cameroon, 'clusters' allow small-scale craftspeople to more easily source wood that is dried, graded and of traceable origin, and have access to industrial maintenance, transportation facilities and financial and administrative services. This encourages these operators to join the formal sector while also easing their access to secondary and tertiary wood processing facilities (wood for flooring, frames, mouldings, prefabricated building components), ultimately creating jobs and products with high added value.Over recent decades, Congo Basin governments -under pressure from NGOshave passed legislation to increase the value of their timber exports pending the development of a true local market for finished products. ■ Milk and dairy products hold huge potential to improve nutrition and livelihoods for millions of poor people across the world, says this FAO publication. But, despite the benefits they could be providing, these products are still too expensive for the poorest families to buy. In response, governments are urged to make nutrition a specific objective in dairy sector development and invest in programmes that help poor families keep small dairy livestock at home. \"A major challenge is for governments to develop inclusive policies and encourage investment from the private sector that helps these small-scale farmers take advantage of the escalating demand for milk and dairy in developing countries,\" say the editors.As well as cows, the book covers the milk composition of other major dairy species such as buffalo, goat and sheep, and less-used dairy species, including donkeys and camels. It also addresses environmental and health concerns that have arisen around milk and dairy in recent years. The editors call for new collaborative initiatives to address the environmental effects of the dairy sector, which accounts for some 4% of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions in addition to increasing pressure on land and water resources.■ Stabilising the climate and eradicating poverty are widely regarded as the two greatest challenges facing humanity in the 21st century. For many, however, these goals represent conflicting interests. If poverty eradication depends on economic growth, how does that square with reducing emissions of greenhouse gases from industrial or agricultural production and from the increasingly energy-hungry lifestyles of those who escape poverty?This highly readable volume in Routledge's Perspectives on Development series, brings insights from economics, geography, climate science and development studies in order to better understand the complex interactions between climate change and development. Initially focussing on the drivers and impacts of climate change, it then examines development responses, including mitigation and adaptation strategies and international finance schemes. A final section looks at the future, advocating the need for transformational visions of development in order to achieve more equitable and sustainable outcomes in a warmer world. ■ From the time of hunter-gatherers to the present day, forests have played a vital role in the development of humanity and society. This broad introductory textbook sets world forestry in a social, environmental, historical and economic context. The development of forests and grasslands, and their relationships with humans is described from the Devonian period through to the 'age of agriculture', covering the factors determining the distribution of forests, the classification of forest types, and the value of forests, forest products and their associated trade. The urgent need to address tropical deforestation, particularly in Brazil, Indonesia and a number of African countries, features strongly in a chapter on 'forest dynamics in the tropics'. In the 20 years between 1990 and 2010, Nigeria lost 48% of its forests through deforestation (by far the worst rate of loss of any country in the world), with Zimbabwe (29%) and Tanzania (19%) taking second and third place in global rankings. In this context, the need to scale up reforestation and sustainable forest management effortsalso outlined -deserves the highest priority.This second edition of the Smart Toolkit was published in book form in 2009, and is now available on CD-Rom. Its primary purpose is to improve learning within development organisations, particularly those involved with information products and services. Development projects are under increasing pressure to demonstrate impact; for information-based activities this is particularly difficult. How does one go about demonstrating the impact of an information service in contributing towards one of the Millennium Development Goals, for instance?The toolkit offers a practical grounding in evaluation, including its place in the project cycle, who is involved in its planning and implementation, how and when it should be followed up, and above all, how to learn from it. It includes many tools that can be applied to information-focussed activities, to enable a sound impact assessment to be made. Clearly written and presented, with numerous 'real world' examples for easy understanding, it's a valuable, down-to-earth contribution to evaluation literature that will be of interest to numerous development organisations.Featuring 25 case studies, this publication provides an overview of the global changes affecting mountain farming and the strategies that communities have developed to cope. Each study presents a set of lessons and recommendations, in an attempt to enable mountain communities to learn from each other's experiences and thereby enhance their resilience. Securing land tenure, providing access to resources, and improving basic infrastructure and access to credit are among the key solutions highlighted to improving the livelihoods and food security of mountain communities. Smart Toolkit, first published in 2005 and updated in 2009, is a manual for information practitioners in self-evaluation of their projects, products and services. While attracting considerable praise, feedback from users has prompted CTA to publish this 'compact primer', in response to comments that the process outlined in the toolkit can seem somewhat daunting. By summarising the key elements of the toolkit, sharing the experiences of users and giving a practical example of how monitoring and evaluation (M&E) works -in the context of the Smart Toolkit newsletter -this short guide gives a clear and concise overview of the evaluation process.Beyond its value as a short reference guide for users of the Toolkit, the guide is also intended to provide an overview of the process to decision-makers and managers in rural and agricultural development institutions, with a view to helping them create a work environment conducive to M&E and organisational learning. This will enable them to significantly improve the quality of information projects, products and services produced by their staff.water Lake Turkana, in Kenya's Rift Valley, is the world's largest desert lake. But a hydropower dam being built upstream will permanently alter the flow of the Omo River which supplies 90% of the lake's water. In addition, irrigation development being planned by Ethiopia could abstract up to 50% of the Omo's inflow into Lake Turkana, potentially leading to a drop in depth from 30 to 10 m. The combined impact, as outlined in this report, will dramatically impact floodplain ecology, fisheries production and the livelihoods of the local population. waste Anaerobic digestion produces biogas (a renewable energy) and bioslurry. The latter is often overlooked, meaning smallholders are seldom aware of the multiple benefits of bioslurry use, or the risks associated with handling and applying it on their farm. The authors examine peer-reviewed literature on the use of bioslurry, including its impact on crop yields, fish production, and use as a pesticide.By l de Groot & A Bogdanski FAO, 2013; 45 pp. iSBn 978-92-5107-929-4 US$17 • €12 downloadable as PdF file from: http://tinyurl.com/luaskjc ■ Population growth, agricultural expansion, and the rise of global food supply chains have dramatically altered how diseases emerge and spread, says this FAO report. For example, in the push to produce more food, farmers have created agricultural land in previously wild areas -putting themselves and their animals into contact with wildlifeborne diseases. This, says FAO's Ren Wang, means that \"we cannot deal with human health, animal health, and ecosystem health in isolation from each other -we have to look at them together, and address the drivers of disease emergence, persistence and spread, rather than simply fighting back against diseases after they emerge.\"To achieve this, FAO advocates the 'One Health' approach -looking at the interplay between environmental factors, animal health and human health, and bringing human health professionals, veterinary specialists, sociologists, economists and ecologists together to work on disease issues within a holistic framework. At the same time, \"livestock health is the weakest link in our global health chain. Disease must be addressed at its source -particularly in animals,\" the report concludes.■ Agricultural forward markets are essentially an informal version of futures markets, whereby deals are done to deliver a crop typically before it has even been sown. While crop futures are traded in a standardised way, through a commodity exchange, forward trading is done 'over the counter' and in the context of agriculture is applicable to storable crops such as grains and pulses, sugar, coffee, cocoa and vegetable oils. Effectively functioning forward markets create security in a crop supply chain; without them, supply chains can be reduced to opportunistic behaviour, with periodic dumping or shortages of products, patterns which can be worsened by government buying and selling. However, forward markets can also be easily undermined, for example by price distortions, dysfunction in the supply chain, hoarding and corruption.This third book in a three part series focuses on how forward markets work, their function and why they frequently fail. It explains why risk management within a market succeeds or fails based on the ability of the forward market to offset risk and provide efficient price signals.A challenging subject given serious attention, targeting those with some background in economics.Young people in ACP countries are seldom attracted into agriculture. In organising its first 'hackathon', CTA offered young graduate computer programming development enthusiasts an opportunity to flaunt their talents and discover potential openings in the agricultural sector.trengthening agricultural productivity and improving livelihoods of youths are two of CTA's major targets and also the principles underpinning the 'hackathon' that was organised during the ICT4Ag international conference held in Kigali in November 2013. A hackathon is an event during which computer programmers (and development stakeholders when required) collaborate for a short period in developing an ICT application or platform to solve a specific issue. The aim of the Kigali event was to highlight the potential of new technologies applied to agriculture while supporting innovation and entrepreneurship, particularly among young people.The hackathon was implemented as a regional championship (with national selection events) for young computer specialists. From the outset, ICT innovation hubs have been sponsoring these young people and have since supported the winners of the competition. The winning entrepreneurs were from Ensibuuko (Uganda), AgriVAS (Ethiopia) and Agrinfo (Tanzania). The winners developed web and mobile software to enable innovative farm credit management, a platform for sending agricultural information by SMS in the national language, and a farmland mapping system. Another team developed a tool to test soil fertility with a pH sensor, with the results subsequently sent to agricultural extension agents by SMS. Inspired by this hackathon, Rwandan authorities have decided to organise a national event.Hackathon follow-up activities have now begun. CTA subsidises ICT innovation hubs that have backed the regional winners. The young entrepreneurs are now being supported in launching their product, benefiting from advice or training, while also being put in touch with investors. These talented young people will also participate in international meetings to build up their professional networks and knowledge. Some will also participate in the CTA Fin4Ag international conference on agricultural value chain finance. A national workshop on the local hackathon experience will take place in Rwanda by June 2014, with the support of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa. CTA plans to organise a regional planning meeting for the entire activity by July 2014.The success of this initiative has attracted the interest of other ACP regions, whose representatives have been approaching CTA for advice and support. We will keep you posted…Our international conferences have always been a unique opportunity for discussions on topics of particular interest to a wide audience. So mark this date in your calendar! All stakeholder groups involved in the agricultural value chain finance sector will come together to explore new tools, mechanisms and approaches, tried and tested over the past few years.CTA and its partners will focus on establishing a dynamic and enabling environment for the sharing of ideas and forging of new partnerships. A vibrant market place will be the core of the event, allowing participants to meet, share, partake, learn and plan forward. Sessions will be predominantly interactive and make use of a number of interactive knowledge sharing methods such as TedTalks, world café, chat shows, panel sessions, peer assist, demonstrations, fish bowl, democracy walls, and open spaces. Multimedia tools will be also be used.The following thematic areas will be addressed in plenary events at the Fin4Ag conference, as well as in a series of parallel meetings.A series of sessions will discuss the various tools of agri-value chain finance. One theme will focus on how to create a critical mass in warehouse receipt finance and collateral management. Another will look at the potential for creating new instruments for farmers to access the capital market. A number of sessions will cover design of agrivalue chain financing mechanisms for specific sectors or purposes, financial instruments to enable farmers to make their production more climate-change-resilient, and specific tools for sectors such as livestock and fisheries. Ways in which financiers can help develop effective value chains linking farmers to cities will be assessed and best practices in agri-value chain finance will be shared.In the 19th and early 20th century, the now-OECD countries relied heavily on their central banks to boost the agricultural sector's access to finance, with facilities such as dedicated discount windows for warehouse receipt finance, the creation of bonded warehouses and the development of specific agricultural financing tools. Such policies have not figured to any significant degree in ACP central bank work programmes. Given the critical importance of boosting agricultural growth, it is high time to revisit this and learn not only from historical experience but also from some of the innovative central bank programmes in other parts of the world.The conference will feature a number of 'How to' sessions -in particular, three of Africa's regional farmers' organisations have identified priorities in increasing value chain finance to farmers. 'How to move to implementation' will be the topic of half a day of sessions for each organisation. Risk management (including price and weather risk, and the relevance of commodity exchanges) will also be discussed. Information, communication and knowledge management (ICKM), as well as training needs, also figure in the conference programme.For more information on the conference go to http://fin4ag.org/The 2014 CTA Fin4Ag conference is designed to catalyse new thinking and broader adoption of best practices in the area of agricultural value chain finance. The conference will take place on July 14-18 in Nairobi, Kenya."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3673464011.json b/main/part_2/3673464011.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..660867a81c65be957cbd0e0bb3f2a429176d9b74 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3673464011.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"fc4ee5a1c86553adfda9afc1c887086e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8aec3749-f5d6-4386-91eb-c54c7ea012d1/retrieve","id":"-1942215076"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3864cd8b-d4fe-40d5-aa1a-4601492eb2af","content":"Recognizing that in the context of global change, tree genetic diversity represents a crucial resource for future forest adaptation, we review and highlight the major forest genetics research achievements of the past decades in biodiversity-rich countries of the Mediterranean region. For this, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature spanning the past thirty years . Putting together the representative regionwide expertise of our co-authorship, we propose research perspectives for the next decade. Recent Findings Forest genetics research in Mediterranean countries is organized into three different scientific domains of unequal importance. The domain \"Population diversity and Differentiation\" related to over 62% of all publications of the period, the domain \"Environmental conditions, growth and stress response\" to almost 23%, and the domain \"Phylogeography\" to almost 15%. Citation rate was trending the opposite way, indicating a strong and sustained interest in phylogeography and a rising interest for genetics research related to climate change and drought resistance. The share of publications from Asia and Africa to the total within the Mediterranean increased significantly during the 30-year period analyzed, reaching just below 30% during the last decade. Summary Describing poorly known species and populations, including marginal populations, using the full potential of genomic methods, testing adaptation in common gardens, and modeling adaptive capacity to build reliable scenarios for forest management remain strategic research priorities. Delineating areas of high and low genetic diversity, for conservation and restoration, respectively, is needed. Joining forces between forest management and forest research, sharing data, experience, and knowledge within and among countries will have to progress significantly, e.g., to assess the potential of Mediterranean genetic resources as assisted migration material worldwide. Introductory quote: Let us collect with care the facts we can observe, let us consult experience wherever we can, and when this experience is inaccessible to us, let us assemble all the inductions which observation of facts analogous to those which escape us can furnish and let us assert nothing categorically; in this way, we shall be able little by little to discover the causes of a multitude of natural phenomena, and, perhaps, even of phenomena which seem the most incomprehensible...The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) recognizes that biological diversity, at all levels of organization, from genes to ecosystems, has an intrinsic value and sustains the life systems of the biosphere. As such, biological diversity needs to be protected and its components to be sustainably used (article 1 of the CBD). Its protection and restoration also strongly interact with climate change mitigation and adaptation: \"limiting global warming to ensure a habitable climate and protecting biodiversity are mutually supporting goals, and their achievement is essential for sustainably and equitably providing benefits to people\" [1••].However, the decade 2011-2020 failed in halting biodiversity loss worldwide [2••]. Despite significant efforts, most national commitments have fallen short of reaching agreed international targets and only six of the twenty Aichi targets have been partially achieved [3]. In addition to long-term effects, such as land use change for agriculture and urbanization, pollution, and invasive species, climate change is now increasingly recognized as a major driver of biodiversity loss [4,5]. Therefore, scientists now call for integrated policies and actions to counter climate change and biodiversity loss, particularly in biodiversity rich regions [6,7].The Mediterranean basin, a crossroads for the European, Saharan, and Irano-Turanian floristic regions, is one of the 36 global biodiversity hotspots [8,9]. Its plant diversity is one of the richest in the world. While occupying 1.6% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, it hosts approximately 7% of the World's plant taxa [10,11]. Moreover, almost 25,000 species are native to the Mediterranean basin, more than half being regional endemics [12]. The European Union recognizes the value of this diversity. Out of the 233 habitats of community importance listed in Annex 1 of Habitat Directive 92/43 of the European Union, 117 are occurring in Mediterranean Europe, among which 93 are exclusively found there. This high rate of endemism and habitat diversity is a striking feature of the Mediterranean flora [13,14], making the Mediterranean basin a key area for the long-term conservation of genetic and taxonomic diversity [15].The tree flora of the Mediterranean basin is also remarkable for its diversity and its ecology. It is composed of 74 genera. A significant subset of 64 occur in Mediterranean Europe, with 210 tree species, 30 of which being endemics, often narrowly restricted [16••]. The geologic and climatic events of the Tertiary, Pleistocene, and Holocene are responsible for this wealth of diversity in modern Mediterranean forests, despite (and sometimes because of) significant human impact [15, 17, 18••, 19, 20, 21]. The resulting geomorphologic, topographic, and geographic complexity of the region also led to significantly diverse genetic lineages [22,23,24].Mediterranean forests and the biodiversity they shelter have adapted to unique climatic factors, such as pronounced bi-seasonality characterized by drought episodes unfavorable to growth during the warm summer season and large year to year variation in total rainfall [25]. They have also endured millennia-long human impact, mainly fragmentation and overexploitation for multiple goods and services, including land use change for agriculture and grazing [13,26].There were an estimated 88 million hectares (ha) of forest area in Mediterranean countries in 2015, representing 2.2% of the world's total forest area of 4.06 billion ha [2 ••]. Forests of Southern Europe represent 73% of the Mediterranean total, while 18% are in west Asia and 9% in North Africa [27].Adopting a more restricted bioclimatic point of view, Mediterranean type forests span circa 25.5 million ha, with an additional circa 50 million ha of scrubland and open forests that are common vegetation types in the Mediterranean [28]. These formations have expanded at a net rate of 0.85% per year between 1990 and 2010, mostly as a result of natural expansion (0.67% per year), with reforestation contributing 0.23% per year to this expansion. Deforestation remains at the low level of 0.05% per year, although it is trending upwards [28].Despite an overall expansion, over 5 million hectares of forests were lost during the 2000-2020 period, of which the vast majority occurred during the second decade of the period. Almost two-thirds of forest cover loss occurred in southwestern Europe, and was mainly due to windstorms and wildfires, possibly aggravated by climate change, but also due to forestry activities. Land clearing for agriculture and urbanization was a major driver of forest loss in southern and eastern Mediterranean countries (Global Forest Watch, https:// www. globa lfore stwat ch. org/, accessed June 2021). Forest degradation where forest is overexploited as cattle range or for fuelwood, and increasing risks where forests are abandoned, are important sources of concern in the region [28]. Climate change is now the most recent of human impacts of significance for Mediterranean forests [29]. In an era of emerging \"mega-disturbances\" [30] when several main drivers of change are acting simultaneously and disturbance is increased by climate change, the hyperdiverse Mediterranean Basin is particularly vulnerable and at risk of biodiversity loss [29,31,32,33], especially its forests, in spite of their current expansion [26,28].Genetic diversity, the heritable diversity within and between individuals and populations, was not a strategic research priority for Mediterranean forests during the decade 2011-2020 [34]. Keywords linked to forest genetics research remained rather inconspicuous in the bibliometric analysis of Nardi et al. [35] and were embedded within the research domain of biodiversity and conservation. However, genetic diversity is now widely recognized not only as underpinning ecosystem functioning, but also as strategic for biodiversity conservation and sustainable management [36,37,38,39 ], including in the Mediterranean [25,41]. Despite its foundational role in adaptation and resilience of ecosystems, genetic diversity has not received full attention in biodiversity research, as well as in natural resource management and policy-making worldwide [42,43]. The indicators developed to facilitate biodiversity conservation and management based on genetic diversity are rarely adopted and genetic diversity is too rarely considered as a valid criterion for planning and designating protected areas [44,45,46].Yet, forest tree genetic research worldwide has made very significant progress during the decade 2011-2020. Among others, new computational and genotyping/sequencing methods have emerged, species identification and population profiling have increased many folds, focus on the role of small-scale genetic diversity patterns in species adaptation and demography has risen sharply, and the importance of demography and selection in local to global patterns has been better understood [47,48,49,50 To quantitatively and qualitatively assess what were the main forest genetics research topics of the past decades in Mediterranean countries, and to identify trends, we performed a bibliometric analysis that was complemented by a qualitative analysis, based on our own expert knowledge, considering that bibliometric analyses do not capture a significant amount of knowledge produced in non-referenced scientific journals in national languages. Here, we define as Mediterranean countries those with at least part of their territory with a Mediterranean bioclimate [16••, 51] or those that belong to the FAO Committee on Mediterranean Forestry Questions -Silva Mediterranea (Fig. 1). Relevant scientific publications (not including grey literature) on forest tree genetics published during the period 1991-2020 were retrieved from the online Scopus database (https:// www. scopus. com), October 11, 2021 [52].The scientific literature was queried using the Scopus' advanced search tool to find specific terms in an article's title, abstract, and authors' keywords [53]. The terms we used in the search queries were selected from a subset of 100 scientific publications, individually selected for their relevance to the field of forest genetics in the Southern European, west Asian, and north African part of the Mediterranean biome (i.e., the Mediterranean region [51]). We verified our selected keywords by running a preliminary query. We then enriched our list of keywords based on the additional terms that emerged from the preliminary query. We then further refined the list by excluding terms associated to other disciplines (medicine, zoology, etc.). The criteria followed for the selection of terms and the details of each query can be viewed in Supplementary File S1. We expect no significant bias from our search methodology (Supplementary File S1).After obtaining a definitive list of search terms, we first carried out a general search of articles in order to run a comparative analysis between Mediterranean (QUERY1-1) and global (QUERY1-2) forest genetics research trends. We then performed a more refined search (QUERY2) of the publications of Mediterranean countries by incorporating into the query, country names (those of Fig. 1), and the tree genera of the Mediterranean region. Finally, we built QUERY3 to compare publication outputs in the field of forest genetics (QUERY2) with that of the field of forest ecology in Mediterranean countries. The details of the queries can be found in Supplementary File S1. The details of the filtering and validation processes can be found in Supplementary File S2. The details of the bibliometric analysis methods are in Supplementary File S3 while the thesaurus we created to curate our authors' keyword database is in Supplementary File S4.To assess the evolution of the research field over time in Mediterranean countries, the dataset of QUERY2 was split into the three sub-periods: 1991-2000; 2001-2010; 2011-2020, the latter one corresponding to the decade that the Mediterranean Forest Research Agenda (MFRA) of the European Forest Institute (EFI) addresses [34]. We first compared the total publication output on forest genetics of Mediterranean countries (QUERY1-1, 353 documents) with that of all countries combined (QUERY1-2, 12756 documents). Overall, the Mediterranean forest genetics research represents only 2.8% of the global output of publications on forest genetics. Figure 2 shows that during the first decade, Mediterranean countries accounted for 1.1% of the worldwide publication production in forest genetics (16 out of 1430). This fraction became 3.4% (119 out of 3507) in the second decade and decreased slightly to 2.8% in the last decade (218 out of 7819). Trends in publication rates increased at the same pace overall between 1991 and 2020 worldwide and in Mediterranean countries (Fig. 2). Mediterranean publications associated with the second decade, more specifically from 2003 to 2011 (Fig. 2), experienced an increased pace. It could be due to the discovery of new molecular biology technologies worldwide during the first decade of our analysis and implemented into Mediterranean research with a slight delay during the second decade, such as the very popular and efficient microsatellite markers (e.g., simple sequence repeat (SSR) [54]).The specific query for forest genetics research in Mediterranean countries (QUERY2) retrieved 1548 validated publications (2109 before filtering and validation). This scientific production is very modest compared to the other non-genetic domains (QUERY3, 40399 publications), representing only 3.8 to 5.2% of the total forest research output of Mediterranean countries.The share of publications from Asia and Africa to the Mediterranean total increased during the 30-year period analyzed (Fig. 3). The increasing trend for west Asia and north Africa compared to Europe over the three decades could be due to an increase in the description of genetic resources of regional or local importance for forestry, food security, and health (e.g., [55,56,57]). During the last decade of 2011-2020, the number of publications for Mediterranean Asia, Africa, and Europe represented respectively the 21.6%, 7.9%, and 70.4% of the total amount of published articles (boxed graph in Fig. 3).To assess the temporal trajectory of selected topics within the broader categories of scientific literature on forest genetics in Mediterranean countries, we first built a network map of keyword co-occurrences over the entire 30-year period (Fig. 4, see methods in Supplementary File S1) using QUERY2 (1548 publications). The minimum threshold defined for any given keyword to be included was its occurrence in at least 40 publications. Thus, 30 out of the 2945 keywords in the thesaurus were used to build a co-occurrence network (Fig. 4). These terms represent the most important topics addressed by the forest tree genetics community in Mediterranean countries. A similar number of keywords are often used in bibliometric analyses as it improves map visualization without losing significant information [58,59]. Supplementary Table S1 reports the statistics associated to each keyword and cluster. Genetic diversity within population and differentiation among populations represent thus the major field of forest genetics research for the Mediterranean countries. Within this red cluster 1, the most frequent keywords were \"Withinpop diversity,\" \"Differentiation,\" \"SSR,\" and \"Conservation\" (Supplementary Table S1). Specifically, \"Within-pop diversity\" occupies a central position in the network (Fig. 4) suggesting that it frequently co-occurs with terms that belong to the other two clusters (highest total link strength of 852, Supplementary Table S1). On the contrary, the blue cluster 3, which refers to studies on biogeography and phylogeny, counts only 4 specific keywords out of the 30 selected. However, they score the highest citation rate with an average value of 55.13, suggesting that highly appreciated articles were published within this field and that they are foundational for the research community.The green cluster 2 addresses topics associated with environmental conditions and adaptation; recurring terms are \"Drought stress,\" \"Climate change,\" \"Growth,\" and \"Biodiversity.\" Its lowest value of link strength (96.08) suggests that it is not as well connected as the other two clusters, representing a somewhat isolated topic of forest genetics research. This could be due to the fact that is the most recently investigated field of research (average of publication year is mid-2011, as opposed to early 2010 for the other two clusters, Supplementary Table S1). The keywords belonging to the green cluster 2, such as \"climate change\" and \"drought stress,\" have the most recent average year of publication (respectively, \"2013.54\" and \"2013.07,\" Supplementary Table S1).In the following sub-sections, we analyze how topics deemed of high importance by our co-authorship are takenup in publications and link to the main clusters and trends of the bibliometric analysis.Throughout the period examined in our literature search, studies aimed at describing genetic diversity were initiated, updated, and completed in many ecologically and economically important Mediterranean and climatically sub-Mediterranean forest trees species, either widespread or of local interest, in some cases for the first time (e.g., [60,61]). The three most studied species were also among the most economically important species in Southern Europe: Pinus pinaster, Quercus suber, and Pinus sylvestris (Fig. 5). They were targeted by 502 publications overall, corresponding to almost 33% of all Mediterranean research outputs found (1548). Studies were based on biochemical and modern molecular techniques, but also on more traditional morphometric research approaches mainly in common gardens. They included the study of growth and adaptationrelated traits, in relation to climate change (Supplementary Table S1, Fig. 4). For the 10 most studied tree species presented in Fig. 5, the genetics literature (QUERY2) represented less than 8% of the total (QUERY3) on average, with a low 3% for Quercus ilex and a high 20% for Populus nigra (data not shown).Many marginal populations of widespread or endemic temperate species are found in the Mediterranean region. Marginal populations are characterized by habitats that are Fig. 5 Changes in cumulative annual publications for the most studied forest tree species. The total in 2020 is the number of publications retrieved for a species during the period 1991-2020. The method for constructing the graph is explained in Supplementary File S4 at the edges of species ranges, where conditions may be less suitable for survival and reproduction, and where specific adaptations presumably occur [62]. Thus, the conservation and sustainable use of these populations pose challenges that require the support of research. COST Action FP1202 (2012-2016) brought together research groups from Europe and Mediterranean countries interested in characterizing and exploring the genetic composition of these populations. It concluded that conservation policies should take marginal and peripheral populations into account, for their conservation and sustainable use. The adaptive potential of the genetic resources found in these populations was considered of relevance and importance for restoration projects and breeding programs [63].Our bibliometric analysis shows that this topic has yet to gain importance. Although its average citation is within the range of citations of most keywords (Supplementary Table S1), the keyword \"Marginal population\" appears only in 13 articles with an average publication year centered on mid-2010 (Fig. 6). The keyword \"Marginal population\" is mostly connected with the red cluster 1 \"Population diversity and differentiation\" (box of Fig. 6, Fig. 4, Supplementary Table S1), but also to the blue cluster 3, \"Phylogeography\" (box of Fig. 6, Fig. 4). Seven out of the 13 publications connected to the \"Marginal population\" keyword concerned non-Mediterranean species, indicating an interest for populations located at the rear-edge (sensu [17]) of European distributions, as much as for marginality within the Mediterranean region itself (e.g., [64,65,66]). Finally, and interestingly, there was no marked connection with stress or climate related keywords (Fig. 6).The exploration of FGR also benefited from technological advances (see keywords in Fig. 4 and their date of average occurrence in Figs. 6 and 8). Moving from isozymes to highly polymorphic molecular markers such as SSR was widespread over the period examined, with research groups sharing the technical load of developing species-specific markers. Progress was also made in the field of genomics, Fig. 6 Co-occurrence network of the 30 most frequent authors' keywords for the 30-year time frame (1991-2020) connected to the keyword \"marginal populations,\" with a time-trend perspective. Circle and link colors indicate the average publication year of the articles in which the relative keyword occurs. The font and circle size of each keyword is proportional to the number of documents in which a keyword occurs; lines indicate co-occurrence links between terms, while line width is indicative of the link strength between two terms (number of publications in which two keywords occur together). The table on the top-right of the figure reports statistics of the keywords to which the term \"Marginal populations\" is most related (see Supplementary Table S1 for a description of the headers) benefiting from a worldwide technological trend. Yet, very few tree species genomes are fully described and sequenced, two of which are of Mediterranean species with agronomic importance: Prunus avium and Olea europaea [21,67,68,69]. However, new genotyping/sequencing methods (exome capture, SPET technology, RADseq, etc.) were used in many Mediterranean species to characterize within and among population diversity and attempt at disentangling the effects of selection and drift on species and population evolution through time and space (e.g., [70,71]).Although not specific to the Mediterranean region, genetic monitoring has emerged as a key research subject, for example, to safeguard a declining biodiversity in EU countries (e.g., EU projects LifeGenMon and GenTree). Its conceptualization is based on a genecological framework and relies on the characterization of a minimum number of indicators and verifiers [72,73]. Despite recent progress [74], many challenges remain, mainly in its implementation and acceptance by forest management and other stakeholders [75].The green cluster 2 (Fig. 4) is the most recently appeared cluster (mid-2011, Supplementary Table S1). It shows a clear connection between trait description, breeding, and adaptation (Supplementary Table S1). The keyword \"Breeding\" occurs 58 times and it is linked with 26 other terms (see Table of Fig. 7 for keywords with the strongest relationships). This connection varies in time, with breeding being more connected to population genetic descriptors during the decade 2011-2020, or disappearing entirely from the network during the decade 2001-2010 (average date for breeding is 2011.59). A main trend of change in genetic research has been from looking for promising genotypes for plantations to characterizing forest reproductive material (FRM) for the adaptation of forests to climate change and the mitigation of risks (Fig. 7). Thus, the link between breeding and drought resistance appears relatively late in our analysis (Fig. 7), indicating an increasing recognition that drought resistance is a key trait for the production of new forest reproductive material adapted to climate change.Common gardens, where the phenotypic traits of FRM of different genetic origins are compared in a common environment, have been a major tool for testing adaptation to varying and changing environments, enabling breeding [76•]. Research breakthroughs during the last decade of the period analyzed made possible the revision of recommendations for use of FRM in some countries, so as to include climate change considerations, i.e., mostly where to source FRM that might best adapt to a changed mid-twenty-first century climate (for France, see https:// agric ulture. gouv. fr/ grain eset-plants-fores tiers-conse ils-dutil isati on-des-prove nanceset-varie tes-fores tieres).Most Mediterranean countries rely on natural regeneration and un-improved seed from identified seed stands for planting. However, breeding using multiple trait selection schemes and multiple environment testing is increasingly seen as a way to cope with climate change and to accelerate/anticipate adaptation measures (Fig. 7). Pinus pinaster remains the only example of a species with a long-developed breeding program (France, and more recently Italy, Morocco, Portugal, and Spain) backed by a strong stakeholder community [77]. Other breeding programs exist also for pines, such as, for example, for Pinus brutia (Turkey), Pinus halepensis (Greece, Morocco, Spain, and Turkey), Pinus pinea (Italy, Morocco, Portugal, Spain, Tunisia, and Turkey), P. nigra (France, Greece, Spain, and Turkey), and P. sylvestris (France, Greece, Spain, and Turkey). However, most of these breeding programs do not consider drought or pest resistance as their main target [78].In low-input breeding programs, traditional and expensive long-term recurrent mating among elite lines is replaced by rapid selection of wild material using provenance tests and short-term surveys and/or easily acquired genomic data for phenotypic prediction or fingerprinting [42,47,79,80]. Interest for low-input breeding is growing for numerous disseminated broadleaves such as Castanea sativa, Prunus avium, and Juglans regia, or conifers such as Pinus pinea [78]. Low-input breeding can be taken up by NGOs and can bring value to clonal archives. In France for example, seed orchards based on high diversity for increased resilience, rather than improved traits for production, built directly from provenance, progeny, or clonal tests, are emerging (for species such as Cedrus atlantica, Abies cephalonica, Pinus nigra subsp. salzmanni).Research on the evolutionary and demographic history of tree species present in the Mediterranean Basin, their Holocene colonization routes from refugia, and the identification of localized refugia in the Mediterranean refugial region (the \"refugia-within-refugia\" concept [81]), is the third major cluster of scientific interest for forest genetics in the Mediterranean (Fig. 4, blue cluster 3). This cluster developed as early as the red cluster 1 (early 2010, average date \"2010.10,\" Supplementary Table S1) and benefited strongly from the development of low effective population size and uniparentally inherited molecular markers [82], the formulation of the coalescent theory [83], and the development of computational tools (e.g., ABC simulations [84]). It is the most highly cited cluster of the three, probably because patterns described in Mediterranean tree species are applicable to other taxa and because the Mediterranean peninsulas were the glacial refugia of most European tree species [85].Phylogeny also belongs to the blue cluster 3, probably because classical timed molecular phylogenies, based usually on low copy nuclear genes and/or mainly plastid DNA markers, have traditionally been used for reconstructing biogeographic patterns within geological time-frames [86,87,88]. During the period, and although paleoecology does not appear as a major keyword in Fig. 4, fossil pollen and/or macrofossil data were often coupled with phylogeographic surveys to investigate spatial distribution of extant genealogically linked lineages [89, 90, 91, 92, 93 •] and ancient DNA was used to further reconstruct detailed evolutionary and demographic history of species [94,95]. Also, phylogenetic approaches have been used in a spatial context to identify regions of high phylogenetic endemism [14•].Interest in the investigation of phylogeographic patterns in Mediterranean tree species has slowed down over the 30-year period examined (Fig. 3). Yet, although refugial areas, often located in the Mediterranean [15,96], and main Holocene colonization routes are known for European and sometimes for Mediterranean African and Asian species (e.g., [92,97]), phylogeographic patterns are often not available at time scales long enough to identify significant events older than the Last Glacial Maximum [18••]. Neither are they available at spatial scales fine enough to help identify refugia and to assist with the design of conservation networks [89,98]. They are also far from being available for all Mediterranean species [99].Forest fires constitute one of the main drivers of tree mortality and forest cover loss in Mediterranean countries [100]. The long-term impact of forest fires can explain speciation in Mediterranean trees [101] and the low genetic diversity found in thermophilic, obligatory seeding species, such as pines [23]. Also, a clear genetic signature of natural selection for serotiny, a major fire-response trait, has been demonstrated [102]. Yet, research on this topic has been limited and fire does not appear as a major keyword of the forest genetics literature (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table S1).The keyword \"Fire\" is mostly connected with keywords of the green cluster 2. Its mean publication period is around late 2009 (Fig. 8), indicating a comparatively early, albeit restricted, interest in forest genetics. The keyword \"Fire\" occurred in only 10 articles and is linked to 29 other keywords; however, the strength of these connections is quite low. Figure 8 and its related table indicate a shift of research focus from selection and measurement of diversity to drought and climate change, potentially because of an increased interest in the correlation between drought and fire in a climate change context. Although weak, a link exists with the blue cluster 2 (see phylogeny in Fig. 8), indicating an interest for studying the role of fire and fire-response traits in evolutionary patterns of Mediterranean trees (e.g., [101]).Under strong threats, ex situ conservation in the form of stands, conservation seed orchards, seed banks, or planted archives becomes a priority [103]. Yet, research on how to design core collections and manage long-term seed viability does not appear as a major keyword (Supplementary Table S1). Most countries manage sizeable networks of common gardens, dating from the 1960s to 1980s that were originally designed for breeding rather than conservation but can be considered as ex situ resources. There is scarce research on seed orchards that both conserve genetic resources ex situ and produce seeds for restoration projects or commercial plantations [104]. Finally, raised awareness of the importance of native genetic resources, possibly spurred by the adoption of the 2011 United Nations Nagoya protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing of genetic resources, has increased research on describing, mapping, conserving, and using native genetic resources [55,56,57,60,61,63,74], including for urban planning [105,106,107,108].Overall, \"Within population diversity\" and \"Differentiation\" (of the red cluster 1 \"Population diversity and Differentiation,\" Table 1) were the most frequently used keywords, keeping Fig. 8 Co-occurrence network of the 30 most frequent author keywords for the 30-year time frame (1991-2020) connected to the keyword \"fire,\" with a time-trend perspective. Circle and link colors indicate the average publication year of the articles in which the relative keyword occurs. The font and circle size of each keyword is proportional to the number of documents in which a keyword occurs; lines indicate co-occurrence links between terms, while line width is indicative of the link strength between two terms (number of publications in which two keywords occur together). The table on the top-right of the figure reports statistics of the keywords to which the term \"Fire\" is most related (see Supplementary Table S1 for a description of the headers) their respective first and third place across all three decades (Table 1). They were the corner stone of forest tree genetics research in the Mediterranean area, demonstrating an interest for both population level and landscape or range-wide genetic patterns and processes. Other keywords increased in frequency with time. The advancement of modern technologies and analytical potential can explain the exponential increase of the \"SSR\" term from 3% during the 1990-2000 decade to over 19% during the 2011-2020 decade (from 21st to second position, Table 1). During the last decade, keywords such as \"Climate Change\" and \"Drought stress\" (of the green cluster 2 \"Environmental conditions, growth and stress response,\" Table 1) also significantly increased their frequency (from 0.7% each during the 1990-2000 decade to 4.0% and 6.0% during the 2011-2020 decade, respectively), changing their ranking from 30th (both) to 10th and 6th, respectively (Table 1). Conversely, keywords related to biochemical techniques (isozymes), techniques proven unreliable (RAPD), or with limited genetic control (morphological traits) significantly decreased in frequency and ranking with time (Table 1).Table 1 The 20 most frequently used keywords per decade. The table aggregates 34 keywords across the three decades studied. Keywords are ordered based on their overall number of occurrences (period 1990-2020). The table shows keyword cluster ID (based on Fig. 4) their number of occurrences, their percentage of contribution to the total number of occurrences overall and per decade (total is higher than 100% due to co-occurrences), and their ranking (R)Cluster There are multiple threats affecting Mediterranean forest genetic resources. These threats are likely to continue increasing and intensifying. They include the following: climate change, leading to increased recurrent drought episodes, water vapor deficit, and heat waves; urban development, agriculture, and other land use changes associated with human demographic increase and resource mining, increased frequency and severity of disturbances, such as forest fragmentation, forest fires, and outbreak of pests and diseases [28]. During the past decades, forest genetics research has closely reflected these growing societal and environmental challenges (Supplementary Table S1). We now use the dynamics of past research interests evidenced by our bibliometric analysis as well as our own expectations and expertise as a basis for proposing research perspectives in the field of forest genetics for the upcoming decade.Efforts at exploring, describing, and characterizing genetic diversity have certainly been carried out during the last decades, assessing genetic diversity within, and differentiation among populations, mostly for biogeographic and conservation purposes (Table 1, Fig. 4). Efforts have intensified in the Eastern and Southern Mediterranean during the most recent decade (Fig. 3). Yet, the hyper diverse tree flora of the Mediterranean basin [16••], which includes non-timber tree species of known or unknown economic value, is far from being fully explored, particularly in the Eastern and Southern Mediterranean. Thus, research should continue investigating fine scale species distribution and focus on their mapping (including threatened populations), taxonomic delineation (including genome-wide DNA barcode approaches), community composition, environmental variability, and genomic make-up [109]. The genetic diversity of under-used species and ecologically marginal and geographically peripheral populations, particularly, deserve further description of their genetic diversity, adaptive capacity, and phenotypic plasticity, thus bridging research interests from all three clusters (Fig. 4). Although proof is accumulating that they may contain rare, unique, and original adaptive genetic diversity [62] and that they may act as warning signals for emerging threats, their contribution to the overall diversity and resilience of species is still unclear. Several benefits can be derived from the adoption of FGR management practices based on thorough genetic diversity descriptions. Better descriptions will improve science-based decision-making, for example, for determining areas where protection efforts (i.e., diversity hotspots) and restoration efforts (i.e., diversity cold spots) should increase [14 •, 110]. Descriptions of multi-proxy patterns of diversity (taxonomic, functional, phylogenetic, genetic, e.g., [111]) will improve and optimize gene conservation networks [112••] and help selection of new material for breeding (\"climatesmart\" material), for example, in areas of high proxy congruence, in addition to guiding the sampling protocols for ex situ conservation in national gene banks. Better descriptions will also enable forest nurseries to diversify the FRM available for afforestation and restoration. Increasing the mapping of taxonomic and genetic diversity will also improve DNA tracking systems for testing the geographic origin and composition of FRM in nurseries and plantations, in the wood trading industry, for certification, and for detecting undesired exotic material in protected habitats. It will thus contribute to bridging the still wide knowledge transfer gap between forest genetics research, policymaking, and management [113].Genomics of climate change traits should be the new direction, focusing on genes underlying traits such as drought, fire, insect and pest resistance and tolerance, increased phenotypic plasticity, and diversified microbiota-to improve our understanding of the genotype-phenotype-climate relationships and species adaptive space under changing environmental conditions (thus connecting more strongly the three research domains of Fig. 4). It is thus likely that, with the advent of the genome wide association studies (GWAS), interest in morphological traits will re-gain momentum (Table 1). What are the thresholds of collapse and extirpation remains a question of critical importance. Thus, better and faster phenotyping of traits meaningful for fitness and adaptation under rapidly changing conditions is the technological challenge to resolve, including the improvement of genomic predictions for breeding and conservation. In addition, the current genomic structure of natural populations holds precious information on the influence of past drivers of change. To learn from the past, probable demographic scenarios and signatures of selection should be tested in as many species as possible, regionally or range wide.An enabling condition for the subsequent steps of testing ( § 3-2) and modeling ( § 3-3) is data availability. Yet, sharing data while protecting the intellectual property rights and sharing of benefits of data to resource owners is challenging. Sharing of archived data, broad collaboration, co-analysis of archived or neglected data, and open access databases are needed to draw new, solid, and generalizable conclusions, and so are research infrastructures connecting genetic diversity sites (GCUs, common gardens) with climate and environment monitoring devices. Transnational networking is needed more than ever (species habitats exist and move as climate changes across borders) at the scale of the Mediterranean basin, a non-politically integrated space where the support from regional institutions such as FAO Silva Mediterranea, EFIMED, and others is required. Conversely, data from management are strongly needed to upscale and broaden research findings [114]. Currently, such shared databases do not exist, and despite worthwhile efforts to archive data in open access repositories, forestry research and management are lagging behind. Data papers and creative commons licensing for old and new description data are a real opportunity for Mediterranean research and researchers that deserve recognition for their invaluable descriptive work (see for example the data papers published by the EU Horizon 2020 GenTree project [115,116,117]). Finally, there is a need for very precise metadata and to constantly improve data quality with clearly defined metadata standards with protocol descriptions and clearly defined data standards following minimum requirements (e.g., minimum sampling size, access to raw data for re-use).Results from exploration, description, and characterization of genetic diversity are needed on their own. They are also needed for testing and experimenting new and little explored dimensions of forest tree species adaptation. Are today's keystone species resilient? What is the pace and the spatial scale of local adaptation? How do demography and selection interact? To what extent do gene flow and hybridization which increase intraspecific genetic variation, facilitate, or prevent local adaptation? What role does the microbiota play in adaptation and to what extent is this microbiota affected by pollution (especially soil)? Such key questions require answers, not only because of their relevance for science, but also to improve species distribution models together with our understanding of resilience and its modification via silviculture [48,49,50,118].One of the methodological solutions for this is the planning and establishment of a new generation of common gardens with extended coverage of genetic diversity, habitats, and traits. High-resolution data such as those provided by satellite imagery are promising for accessing environmental information. Common gardens, although an old tool [119], remain particularly relevant as \"space-for-time\" experiments. While data from existing common gardens will continue to be of interest, particularly in the most challenging climates of Mediterranean Asia and Africa, we should acknowledge that they were designed and built at times of stable (or considered so) climate, mostly focusing on then promising genotypes for plantation forestry [42, 76 •]. Thus, new common gardens are needed, testing new species, new lineages, and genotypes, in new and potentially harsher habitats, for new usage and traits of interest for the bioeconomy, not just for the Mediterranean region, but also in a broader temperate perspective as the Mediterranean climate is progressing to higher altitudes and latitudes under a climatechanged future [29,120].Testing risks in common gardens, including at early life stages in both nursery and natural conditions, is of key importance. Among recurring risks, and one that will likely increase, is drought stress, which went from being considered a topic of low concern to one of the top 10 topics of interest in the most recent decade (Table 1). Genomics of drought has moved from detecting single genes via random screening approaches [121] to not only identifying populations and lineages with potential adaptations, but also characterizing genes and gene networks involved in drought tolerance and resistance [76•, 122•]. Similarly, biotic interactions are likely to shift, increasing risks of insect and disease outbreaks. For example, bark beetles are generally considered as secondary pests that target stressed and weakened trees facing climate, soil, water, or pathogen stresses, but some species (primary pests) or some outbreaking populations of secondary pests can also attack and kill healthy trees [123]. This might lead to changing disturbance cycles, altered competition, and facilitation processes and possibly, to entirely new succession cycles and community composition.New species and genotypes to test should be those likely to be \"climate change winners\" (including small and marginal populations as well as isolated trees, potentially adapted to extreme site condition, obtained from identified sources) and those likely to spread northward and to higher altitude. Also of importance are species for which the main interest may be other than wood production, such as those producing edible crops and health or green-chemistry-related compounds, or those with high ornamental value or high resistance to fire, erosion, or other biotic or abiotic risks. New genotypes for commercially important species should be selected from trees growing at ecological margins, both risking extirpation and being at the forefront of colonization. Habitats tested should also include ecological margins, while genetic material should be tested in replicated ways, including under controlled conditions in growth chambers and nurseries, to identify the factors driving earlystage genetic diversity patterns (demography and/or selection). The impact of nursery practices (culling, etc.) on the genetic variation of the produced FRM is also of concern and needs to be addressed.Climate change \"losers\" should not be forgotten either. Whereas their habitat may shrink dramatically according to niche modeling, new areas will become favorable and genotypes and lineages that are likely to disappear under climate change in some areas may be the winners in other areas [124, 125 •]. While genomic prediction and offset can be of help for such predictions [126], common garden experiments are needed as well for ground-proofing, both in habitats that are likely to disappear (for example in Mediterranean Asia and Africa), as well as in those that are likely to become favorable, so as to correctly and thoroughly test for general and local adaptations.Finally, medium-to large-scale planting and restoration operations by the public and private sectors (forest companies), either conducted using local material or in the form of assisted migration plantations, using exotic or alternative provenance(s) in habitats of potential future suitability, can de facto be considered as valuable tests and demonstrators, to support upscaling common garden results, providing information on reproductive material selection (which origins succeed and which fail) and raising awareness of the importance of genetic diversity for adaptation. This exciting and original perspective of using everyday forestry practice as an experiment of adaptive potentials demands that passport (precise geographic origin of the material mostly) and performance data are safeguarded and shared. This is probably the most challenging element of this perspective.Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Paris Agreement of December 2015, forests worldwide are expected to provide both mitigation and adaptation solutions to anthropogenic disturbances. Yet, climate change is increasingly disrupting forests, sometimes severely in the form of massive die back, along with the benefits they provide to humans [127,128]. Science is expected to provide solutions for their adaptive capacity, including via genetic adaptation, and to evaluate controversial management solutions that are starting to emerge such as assisted migration, species replacement and the use of nonnative species, enrichment of natural forests via small scale plantation of expected climate change winners, composite provenancing, and targeted provenancing (see definitions in [129,130]). All of these strategies to mitigate the expected effects of climate change contain some level of risk for the delivery of services, which science is asked and expected to evaluate [129]. These risks include biological invasions, disruption of local adaptation, and changes of dependent microbiota, maladaptation, and outbreeding depression.In this context, forest tree species of the Mediterranean basin and their different gene pools are considered valuable genetic resources not just locally, but also for non-Mediterranean regions and countries, whose climate is predicted to evolve towards a Mediterranean-like climate by the end of the twenty-first century [131]. Thus, modeling the adaptive capacity of Mediterranean forest genetic resources has a far-reaching global interest. The modeling of current and expected species distribution ranges using ecological niche models that include processes (plasticity, phenology, dispersal, etc.) and increasingly complex and high-resolution environmental data [132,133,134] is one way of progressing in this domain.Process-based biophysical models that take genetic diversity into consideration are also still needed to understand how genetic diversity, demography, and ecophysiological processes interact to mitigate collapse by water stress, pests and diseases, heat, frost, etc., all of which can occur over relatively short spatial and temporal scales [135]. This effort in the Mediterranean countries can be fueled mainly from monitoring of common garden data. Another area of development from such models is breeding. New generations of (low-) breeding programs incorporating diversity, resilience, and resistance to risks as an added (or alternate) goal to traditional biomass and wood production can and should emerge from an increased understanding of the phenotype-genotype-environment relationships and interactions. Finally, these models would also be very appropriate to test how forest management influences genetic diversity and vice versa, how genetic diversity benefits management for resilience, as experimenting in this field can be quite complicated (but see [136]).Forests are a defining element of both the natural landscape and the economy of Mediterranean countries, with genetic diversity a pillar of their biodiversity. Yet, research on forest genetics has remained modest in comparison to overall forest research in Mediterranean countries. During the next 10 years, the Mediterranean forest research community should have a prominent role in describing, testing, and modeling genetic diversity, understanding how severe threats due to climate change and other human activities can be mitigated, benefiting from high local and landscape heterogeneity (Fig. 9). One avenue for this could be to better cross-fertilize the currently compartmentalized three distinct research clusters that define the community of forest geneticists, based on our analysis, using common hypotheses and compatible methods, and linking results across clusters (Fig. 9). Its sharp local climate and ecological transitions make the Mediterranean region one of the most appropriate in the world to study microevolution (under different gene flow regimes), identify past and present drivers leading to the emergence of marginal populations, and evaluate the links between genotypes, phenotypes, and climatic drivers constraining tree growth, reproductive output and fitness, and, ultimately, adaptation [137, 138, 139, There is a clear gap that needs filling between north, south, and east Mediterranean forest genetics knowledge. European forest tree species tend to be more fully described, tested, and modeled despite the importance of southern and eastern Mediterranean species in a region of the world with rapidly changing climate and strong pressures on biodiversity. The Mediterranean is not an integrated political arena and it does not benefit from a common framework that could shape agreements towards a common research goal. Integrating forest genetics research among EU and non-EU countries of the Mediterranean remains a challenge. Well-recognized institutions and programs, such as EUFORGEN (hosted by EFI), the PRIMA foundation, FAO Silva Mediterranea, the intergovernmental Union for the Mediterranean, and the European Union research framework programs, should take a leading role at fostering this research integration.Mediterranean forest social-ecological systems have been shown to be particularly sensitive to forest policy management scenarios in their response to climate change [141,142,143,144]. The lack of FGR-based management could be due both to missing knowledge and research, missing transfer of scientific knowledge to managers and policy makers [113]. The Mediterranean forest genetics research community thus has a leading role in meeting the needs of forest management based on the principles of multifunctional forest use, proposing sustainable management strategies for FGR in a highly heterogeneous landscape where forest ecosystems can be either resilient or declining. In doing so, the Mediterranean forest genetics research community will significantly contribute to many of the key commitments of EUFORGEN's recently published European Forest Genetic Resources Strategy [145], including improving information on, conservation of, and sustainable use of forest genetic resources.Finally, Mediterranean forests have been managed as multifunctional social-ecological systems for millennia, producing not just timber and fuel-wood but also many non-wood products and services, such as wild edible species important for food security [146,147,148]. As a multistakeholder social-ecosystem, forests are an ideal model for building participatory research approaches and study usage conflicts such as conservation with or without management and conservation vs exploitation [149], thus contributing to resolving the combined objectives of production, resilience, sustainability, and biodiversity protection. The Mediterranean Forest research community should increase efforts towards conducting cutting-edge multidisciplinary research and innovation in the area of sustainable management of FGR for traditional and new bioeconomy usage, under the pressure of climate change [150]. Multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary prospective work is needed, using IPCC scenarios as baselines, but moving beyond solutions limited to market economy paradigms which have up to now led to a rather unsustainable use of natural resources [151,152]. The "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3705443116.json b/main/part_2/3705443116.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6671bf725eaf869e033ed598d607b78ea476b346 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3705443116.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0ccd333a0f8bf94b989c8b3b93a6106b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/96fb57d6-3c9e-47e7-87ae-03a0d0ed72e9/retrieve","id":"-1894995792"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"061243e6-b632-4d49-9ef4-37d38395793f","content":"Although most small-scale farmers in sub-Saharan Africa play a crucial role in conserving traditional crop varieties, some farmers, known as \"custodian farmers,\" stand out by their commitment to preserving a wide diversity of crop varieties, including rare and endangered species/varieties. They also act as custodians of intergenerational traditional knowledge related to planting, conservation, preparation, and use of these crops1.Identify and characterize custodian farmers dedicated to Bambara groundnut and Sorrel cultivation.conserved by these custodian farmers.3.Investigate conservation methods utilized by these farmers for landrace seeds. Before data collection, we engaged with local authorities and held village assemblies to introduce the project. Data collection Two distinct focus group discussions (FGDs) in every villageone for men and another for women. Individual semi-structured interviews was conducted with each identified custodian farmer. ❑ Six traditional landraces identified ❑ Criteria for identification: calyx size and plant color ❑ Short calyx landrace: \"Bii\"/ Long calyx landrace: \"Wegda\" In some villages, custodian farmers have a special focus on preserving specific plant species or varieties due to their deep cultural and/or medicinal importance, which has been passed down through generations. An example is the cultivation of Bambara groundnut, which is predominantly carried out by the elderly population as it holds significant traditional and ritualistic value in certain communities. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3726989626.json b/main/part_2/3726989626.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8ddcb50170273d51a1af029b8a9916cbb223dae --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3726989626.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"948b18cb7ea61690d664f0caa59c5c4c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2283fe75-f376-4682-8bdf-36e4a754af01/retrieve","id":"-996066186"},"keywords":["Climate change","semi-arid areas","gridded climate data"],"sieverID":"a2442240-d70c-4aca-b499-8a22ff17ee19","content":"Climate change is one of the major challenges in 21 st century faced by Agriculture in India, more so in the Semi-Arid Tropics (SAT) of the country. In recent years, natural and anthropogenic factors have impacted climate variability and contributed to a large extent to climate change. Based on one degree gridded data of India Meteorological Department (IMD) for 34 years , climatic water balances are computed for 351 pixels in India and used for classifying in to six climate types following Thornthwaite's moisture regime classification and areas falling under different climatic zones in India are delineated. Considerable changes in the country's climate area observed between the two periods; 1971-90 and 1991-2004. Increased semi-arid area by 8.45 M ha in five states viz., Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Punjab, and decreased semi-arid area by 5 M ha in eleven states, contributed to overall increase in SAT area of 3.45 M ha in the country.Overall, there has been a net reduction of 10.71 M ha in the dry sub-humid area in the country. Results indicated that dryness and wetness are increasing in different parts of the country in the place of moderate climates existing earlier in t hese regions. ICRISAT's Hypothesis of Hope through Integrated Genetic and Natural Resources Management (IGNRM) using climate ready crops and Integrated Watershed Management could be a potential adaptatio n strategy by bridging the yield gaps for developing climate resilient agriculture in the country.It is now recognized that global warming, part of the climate change phenomenon, is due to sharp increases in the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHG) such as carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), nitrous oxides (N 2 O), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) beyond their natural levels. Indian Network of Climate Change Assessment (INCCA) brought out a report (INCCA, 2010) recording the GHG emission estimates in India, becoming the first \"non-Annex I\" (i.e., developing) country to publish such updated numbers. In 2007, India ranked 5th in aggregate GHG emissions in the world, behind USA, China, EU and Russia. Interestingly, the emissions of USA and China were almost 4 times that of India in 2007. It is also noteworthy that due to the efforts and policies that were proactively put in place, the emissions intensity of India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) declined by more than 30% during the period 1994-2007. India announced its plan to further reduce the emissions intensity of its GDP by 20-25% between 2005 and 2020, even as the country pursues the path of inclusive growth (INCCA, 2010).Climate change is an important driver affecting livelihoods, particularly in developing countries like India, with large agrarian-based livelihoods exist. In India, climate change could exacerbate existing stress on ecological, natural resources and socioeconomic systems due to growing population, urbanization, industrialization and economic development.Measurement of atmospheric turbidity (attenuation of incoming solar radiation) has shown a steady increase as a result of anthropogenic activities (DST, 2008). Indian annual mean (average of maximum and minimum), maximum and minimum temperatures showed significant warming trends of 0.51, 0.72 and 0.27°C 100 yr -1 , respectively, during the period 1901-2007 (Kothawale et al., 2010). However, accelerated warming was observed in the period 1971-2007, mainly due to intense warming in the recent decade 1998-2007. Mean annual temperature of India in 2010 was +0.93°C above the 1961-1990 average and the India Meteorological Department (IMD) declared that 2010 was the warmest year on record since 1901 (IMD, 2010). Mean temperature in the pre-monsoon season (March-May) was 1.8°C above normal during the year 2010.At the country level, no long-term trend in southwest monsoon rainfall was observed; although an increasing trend in intense rainfall events are reported. Goswami et al., (2006) analysed gridded rainfall data for the period 1951-2000 and found significant rising trends in the frequency and the magnitude of extreme rainfall events, and a significant decreasing trend in the frequency of moderate events over central India during the monsoon seasons. The seasonal mean rainfall does not show a significant trend, because the contribution from increasing heavy events is offset by decreasing moderate events. They concluded that a substantial increase in hazards related to heavy rainfall is expected over central India in the future. Increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events in the past 15 years were also reported by Samra et al. (2003 and2006). Chattopadhyay and Hulme (1997) reported that potential evapotranspiration has decreased over the whole country in the monsoon and post-monsoon seasons and the decreasing trend is up to a maximum of about 0.3 mm day -1 decade -1 over west-central India.Trends in annual reference crop evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) at Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh indicated a reduction of about 200 mm from 1850 mm to 1650 mm during the 35-year period 1975-2009(Rao and Wani, 2011). At Patancheru, contribution of energy balance term to the total ET 0 has shown an increasing trend while aerodynamic term has a decreasing trend. Wind speed has shown a strong negative trend leading to the dramatic fall of the aerodynamic term and consequently the ET 0 . Rate of reduction in evapotranspiration demand was about 10% for kharif (Jun-Oct) and about 14% for rabi (Nov-Feb).It is evident from the various studies that climate change in India is real and it is one of the major challenges faced by Indian Agriculture, more so in the semi-arid tropics (SAT) of the country. India ranks first among the countries that practice rainfed agriculture in terms of both extent and value of production. The rainfed agro-ecologies cover about 60 per cent of the net sown area of 141 million ha and are widely distributed in the country (DOAC, 2011).Rainfed agriculture is practiced under a wide variety of soil types, agro-climatic and rainfall conditions. Rainfed agriculture supports nearly 40% of India's estimated population of 1.21 billion in 2011 (Sharma, 2011). Even after achieving the full irrigation potential, nearly 50% of the net cultivated area may remain dependent on rainfall. Reduction in yields due to climate change is likely to be more prominent in rainfed agriculture and under limited water availability.Thus, there is a need to review the areas falling under the different climate zones in India to understand the changing rainfall and temperature patterns over the last few decades. Accordingly, a study was carried out by ICRISAT to assess the changes in areas under different climates in India.Based on the daily rainfall data of 1803 stations, and following the interpolation method proposed by Shepard (1968), a high resolution (1° x 1° Lat/Long) gridded daily rainfall data set was developed by the IMD (Rajeevan etal., 2005). A daily gridded temperature data set for the Indian region with a similar resolution was also developed by IMD using temperature data of 395 quality controlled stations (Srivastava etal., 2009). These data sets were procured from the IMD, and daily gridded climate data (maximum temperature, minimum temperature and rainfall) of 351 pixels in India (Fig. 1) for 34 years was retrieved.The IMD daily gridded data originally was in binary format with 1120 pixels for each day in the geographical window of 6.5 to 37.5 °N latitude and from 66.5 to 100.5° E longitude for each calendar year. Binary data converted in to text format for each year; data for 351 pixels falling inside the Indian country boundary were picked out and correct latitude and longitude values assigned. These 34 yearly files were converted in to 351 pixel-wise files. It was observed that there were missing values in all the parameters; majority of them are in the NE India. Some are in the border regions of Jammu & Kashmir, Rajasthan and Gujarat. These gaps were either filled with neighbouring pixel values or normal values. After quality checking databases were developed for use in water balance computations and climate change analysis.Potential Evapotranspiration (PET) or Reference Crop Evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) was estimated following the method of Hargreaves andSamani (1982 and1985). The simplified equation is ET 0 = 0.0135 (KT) (Ra) (TD) 1/2 (TC+17.8)Where TD = Maximum daily temperature minus minimum daily temperature (ºC) for weekly or monthly periods and TC is the average daily temperature (ºC); Ra = Extra-PAPER 2 Climate classification results of 351 pixels were converted to points and re-interpolated using ArcGIS 10.0 since a 1° x 1° pixel is coarse and patchy to show the climate zones clearly. The Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) method is used to interpolate the point data with an exponent of distance as 2 and the search radius fixed to 30 minutes and the number of points around the estimated value limited to 6. This was achieved after exploring different combinations of input variables which can be changed within the set limits. The resolution of the output grid is fixed at approximately 5 km. This method was used because IDW is an exact interpolator and estimated values do not cross the range of values in the total dataset. The area under each climate is the number of pixels multiplied by the area of each pixel which is fixed at 5 km. Minor aberrations in the area estimated and the area by conventional method was adjusted to remove ambiguity and state-wise areas under each climate were quantified for both periods.Considerable changes in climates are observed between the two periods, 1971-90 and 1991-2004. Salient features (Fig. 2) are increase in the arid areas in Rajasthan (1.53 M ha) and Gujarat (0.98 M ha), and increase in semi-arid areas in Madhya Pradesh (3.82 M ha), Bihar (2.66 M ha) and Uttar Pradesh (1.57 M ha).Total increase in arid area is about 2.63 M ha in three states viz. Rajasthan (1.53 M ha), Gujarat (0.98 M ha) and Andhra Pradesh (0.12 M ha) while total reduction is about 1.03 M ha due to changes in Punjab (0.44 M ha), Karnataka (0.28 M ha), Haryana (0.16 M ha) and Maharashtra (0.15 M ha). For the country as a whole, net change in arid area is 1.60 M ha. Increase in the arid areas of Rajasthan and Gujarat is due to shifting of semi-arid areas in to arid. terrestrial radiation (mm/day); and KT = empirical coefficient. Relative humidity is indirectly present as the difference in maximum and minimum temperature. The temperature difference (TD) is linearly related to relative humidity (Hargreaves and Samani, 1982). Hargreaves (1994) recommended using KT = 0.162 for 'interior' regions and KT = 0.19 for 'coastal' regions. KT value is considered as 0.17 in the present analysis.Soil water-holding capacities for the 351 pixels were estimated based on the soil map of National Bureau of Soil Survey & Land Use Planning (NBSS&LUP, 1985). Pixelwise weekly water balances and climate indices for 34 years were computed based on the revised water budgeting approach of Thronthwaite and Mather (1955). Climates for each year were classified based on the annual moisture index (Table 1) as per classification of Thornthwaite and Mather (1955). While assessing climate change, it is an accepted method to find deviations from a base period. As per the WMO guidelines, 30-year continuous data is required to compute climatic normals. Standard periods for climatic normals are 1931-60 and 1961-90. In the present case, gridded data availability was 1971-2004, hence 1971-1990 is considered as the base period or period 1 and 1991-2004 is considered as period 2. Average climates classified into six types for both the periods 1 and 2. ha), Andhra Pradesh (0.24 M ha), Orissa (0.16 M ha), Himachal Pradesh (0.15 M ha), Maharashtra (0.04 M ha), Haryana (0.03 M ha), Kerala (0.02 M ha) and Uttarakhand (0.02 M ha). For the country as a whole, net change in semi-arid area is 3.45 M ha. These changes are mainly due to increased dryness at the expense of dry sub-humid 3 and Table 2.Total increase in dry sub humid area is about 2.51 M ha due to changes in Tamil Nadu, Chhattisgarh, Punjab, Haryana, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Karnataka while total reduction is about 13.22 M ha due to changes in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Kerala. Net change in dry sub humid area is 10.71 M ha, some of which shifted towards drier side and some towards wetter side. There is no change in dry subhumid areas in Rajasthan. In the country as a whole, about 4.78 M ha of area has increased in moist sub-humid climate type while about 0.47 M ha area has decreased in per-humid climate.Climate change impacts in India vary both quantitatively and qualitatively by crop, level of agronomic management, region and season (Mall et al., 2006).ICRISAT's research findings showed that Integrated Genetic and Natural Resources Management (IGNRM) through participatory watershed management is the key for improving rural livelihoods in the SAT (Wani et al., 2002(Wani et al., , 2003(Wani et al., and 2011)). Comprehensive Assessment (CA) of rainfed agriculture undertaken by the ICRISAT-led consortium showed vast potential of rainfed agriculture, as large yield gaps exist and current farmers' crop yields are lower by two to five folds of achievable yields (Rockström et al., 2007and 2010, Wani et al., 2003, 2009and 2011). Even under a climate change regime, crop yield gaps can still be significantly narrowed down with improved management practices and using Germplasm adapted for warmer temperatures (Wani et al., 2003, 2009and Cooper et al., 2009). Some of the climate resilient crops are short-duration chickpea cultivars ICC 96029 (Super early), ICCV 2 (Extra-early) and KAK 2 (Early maturing); wilt resistant pigeonpea hybrid (ICPH 2671) with a potential to give 80% higher yields than traditional varieties developed through cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) system; and short-duration groundnut cultivar ICGV 91114 that escapes terminal drought. Fig. 3 : Changes in areas in selected states between 1971-1990 and 1991-2004 PAPER 2Integrated Watershed Management comprises improvement of land and water management, integrated nutrient management including application of micronutrients, improved varieties and integrated pest and disease management; and substantial productivity gains and economic returns by farmers (Wani et al., 2003). The goal of watershed management is to improve livelihood security by mitigating the negative effects of climatic variability while protecting or enhancing the sustainability of the environment and the agricultural resource base. Greater resilience of crop income in Kothapally (Andhra Pradesh) during the drought year 2002 was indeed due to watershed interventions. While the share of crops in household income declined from 44% to 12% in the non-watershed project villages, crop income remained largely unchanged from 36% to 37% in the watershed village (Wani et al., 2009). Agroclimatic analysis coupled with crop-simulation models, and better seasonal and medium duration weather forecasts, help build resilience to climate variability/change in watersheds (Rao et al., 2008).Sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide in the soil has the potential to achieve the multiple objectives of improving the soil quality and fertility of the semi-arid tropical soils and addressing climate variability/change. Evidence from a long-term experiment at ICRISAT-Patancheru since 1976 demonstrated a virtuous cycle of persistent yield increase under the improved system compared to the traditional system (Wani etal., 2009 andWani andRockström, 2011). More importantly, under the improved system, the 0-120 cm soil profile contained 46.8 t C ha -1 compared to 39.5 t C ha -1 in the traditional management system. Hence, great scope exists for such improved systems for not only maintaining environmental quality but also addressing climate variability / change as a mitigating measure. There is also an urgent need to develop a climate change network for Indian agriculture by adopting a hybrid model of using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) where it is feasible along with traditional communication channels like community radios, TV, mobile telephones and trained human resources at community and village level (Wani et al., 2012). This will go a long way in building the resilience of the community to cope with the impacts of climate change, particularly in rainfed areas.Analysis of the gridded climate data of IMD indicated increase in the arid areas in Rajasthan, Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh, and increase in semi-arid areas in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Punjab. Overall, there has been a net reduction in the dry sub-humid area (10.7 M ha) in the country, of which about 5.1 M ha (47%) shifted towards the drier side and about 5.6 M ha (53%) became wetter. Dryness and wetness are increasing in different parts of the country in the place of moderate climates existing earlier in these regions. Increasing dryness in the arid and semi-arid areas along with increasing rainfall variability is a serious challenge for Indian agriculture. Impacts of climate variability and change could be minimized / coped through bridging the vast (two to three folds) gaps between the yields currently obtained by farmers and achievable potential yields. Evidence exists on feasibility of harnessing the untapped potential of rainfed agriculture through farmer-centric IWM approach by operationalizing the IGNRM. ICRISAT and partners have proposed the \"Hypothesis of Hope\" by developing climate resilient agriculture using climate ready crop cultivars and IWM approach as a powerful approach to adapt and mitigate the impacts of climate change. There is an urgent need to enhance the awareness about the climate change and new strategies using innovative science-based information and communication tools along with enabling policies and institutional options."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3737934657.json b/main/part_2/3737934657.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e22cdd514ff44e2f4e3285a0920e739db7f12a8e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3737934657.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0f47358f3a48b8abda52d809f14b2708","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/a1b45620-14f5-457e-80a7-1c816e2f465e/content","id":"811876049"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"fbdf34fa-eb46-4455-8b06-5e36f5930253","content":"Data Source: USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service, Production, Supply, and Distribution Database.Average yield increase globally has been ~40 kg.ha -1 .yr -1 over the last half century and about the same in four blocks each of of 14 year.  Licensing of some of these traits from private partners has been difficult. Recent technological breakthroughs have opened new avenues to generate agronomically important traits in native state, that is, the product is non-GM. CIMMYT possesses state-of-the-art laboratories and expertise to conduct transgenic research and produce novel products that complement conventional breeding.• Maize:-In-license de-regulated traits from industry • Wheat:-Set up high-throughput wheat transformation capability to generate new traits, for example, disease resistance and herbicide tolerance Resistance is recessive as hets are as susceptible as the susceptible ones. Likely a suppressor, the mutant form of which is not released from the regulatory site by the viral signal, not allowing the defense genes to be turned on. Ten amino acids can be substituted in the ALS enzyme, conferring resistance against sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides without affecting the activity. Two examples are shown where the alteration of a proline (P) to serine or a few other residues and that of tryptophan (W) to leucine (L) makes the enzyme resistant to this class of herbicides.Wheat has multiple gene copies for ALS.Genomic Copies of EPSPS: Maize 1, Wheat 7 • The technology has been around for several decades but was difficult to use, only for the resource-rich outfits. • A recent advancement, clustered regularly-interspersed short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas9 system, has revolutionized gene editing. • Initial successes already achieved in maize, rice, soybean, tomato, and wheat. • We will employ CRISPR-Cas9 to edit genes in wheat and maize, the latter in collaboration with DuPont Pioneer. • Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and USAID • Partners: DuPont-Pioneer; KALRO; ARC-South Africa.• Expected outputs: Native trait alleles to enhance yield under N stress; transgenic maize varieties with increased yield under N stress.• Funding: Min. Agric. Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Japan.• Partners: JIRCAS, RIKEN PSC, CIMMYT, IRRI, CIAT.• Expected outputs: Identify useful regulatory genes for drought tolerance; contribute to sustainable food production.• Year 1 -Laboratory is equipped and fully functional -High throughput wheat transformation established -Gene editing initiated in wheat for disease resistance -Gene editing in maize undertaken in collaboration with a private partner for the same traits • Year 2 -Gene editing expanded to multiple targets, including heat tolerance and increased grain lysine -Gene editing initiated for agronomic traits other than heat tolerance • Year 3 -First products ready for testing in the greenhouse and possibly field -Gene editing expanded to possibly herbicide tolerance "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3741213508.json b/main/part_2/3741213508.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..59d1273b9a52a1be11fcadb46d3694fb18a39e73 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3741213508.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"eacd67976513ecf6f7422dad42890684","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/dc18c244-44ed-4b60-9afd-206ca3f5e320/retrieve","id":"1339170255"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b7c0c278-a652-480c-8543-963b3bdbd020","content":"NlC 151 3 3 4 4'\" => '\" ~ '\" '\"'\"\"\" t liNO -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -637!Y;;hAD3 HAS 44b: 2a4 ; 2 J 6 7 3 j 1 3 7 3 7 8 7 4:, ó 7 7 n 13 20 18 13 H 23 18 26 Z7 25 lb5 458 2~~ ~0:1 8 1Be 474 5:! 3~7 398 - --------------------~---------------------------------------------------------------~-~-------~~------------~--------------------------------- IAri 9@ , A 40 -----------------------------------------------------------------~-------------~ ---------~------------~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------------~-- ,-------------------~ --------._-----~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------~ -~ ---~----------------------~ ------- --------------------------~ ----------~ ---------------~ ~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- 399 CtlHi-ES 7.12 -------------~~----------------~------------------------------------------------~~--------.~---------~--------------_._-~~-----------------------------_. __ --------~-----------------------------~~~------~----------------------------~-------------------------------------------------~--------------------------~~~----------------~---~-314 \"POS la467-2G-H OOR 364: Cu : 1 ::; 3' tI 3 3 1 1 3. 3 7 4 8 3 7 2 IlEneo 83 , EH! m~ Respür~sablE-! SiliflO Hugo Dr,,;:cú S."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3743328948.json b/main/part_2/3743328948.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4020af6dcfd3a4d411531697daee9a0b0c2baa98 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3743328948.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"732649510bda68e018be0e832769c5d3","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5a4a3900-e663-4f9c-bd74-3fc8317ed6ef/content","id":"28552726"},"keywords":["climate finance","mitigation","agriculture","stakeholders","financial institutions"],"sieverID":"4c304255-69fc-458b-9531-c9f946cfb3ca","content":"More than one-quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions come from agriculture, forestry, and land-use change. As with other sectors of the economy, agriculture should also contribute to meeting countries' emission reduction targets. Transformation of agriculture to low-carbon food systems requires much larger investments in low emission development options from global climate finance, domestic budgets, and the private sector. Innovative financing mechanisms and instruments that integrate climate finance, agriculture development budgets, and private sector investment can improve and increase farmers' and other value chain actors' access to finance while delivering environmental, economic, and social benefits. Investment cases assessed in this study provide rich information to design and implement mitigation options in agriculture through unlocking additional sources of public and private capital, strengthening the links between financial institutions, farmers, and agribusiness, and coordination of actions across multiple stakeholders. These investment cases expand support for existing agricultural best practices, integrate forestry and agricultural actions to avoid land-use change, and support the transition to market-based solutions.Food production and consumption are gradually becoming a dominant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. More than one-quarter of the world's GHG emissions come from agriculture, forestry, and land-use change, and this is likely to increase in the absence of mitigation actions in the sector (IPCC 2019, McKinsey 2020). Livestock is a dominant sub-sector in agricultural emissions (31%) followed by crop production (27%) and land-use change (24%) (Poore and Nemeek 2018). Regional disparities in agricultural emissions can also be observed based on production systems, input use, and level of agriculture intensification. Agriculture alone contributes an average of 18% of the net GHG emissions of the large emerging economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa-BRICS). Five countries (China, Brazil, India, United States, and Indonesia) with agricultural emissions of more than 200 Mt CO 2 eq contribute about 42% of the total global agriculture emissions (Richards et al 2015).Achieving the global target of limiting 1.5 • C-2.0 • C warming under the Paris Agreement would require large changes in current food production, distribution, and consumption patterns (IPCC 2019, Steiner et al 2020). In addition, actions to reduce agricultural GHG emissions can have a synergistic effect on several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (Campbell et al 2018). Promotion of low emissions agriculture development directly contributes to Climate Action (SDG 13) as the goal considers both adaptation and mitigation actions. Moreover, the first United Nations Food Systems Summit (2021) also stands in full support of global food systems transformation for more resilient and low emissions agriculture development. These all global initiatives emphasize investments in scaling up innovations that support resilience building and low emissions development in agriculture and allied sectors.Recent GHG mitigation research in the agriculture and allied sectors has explored a range of options that can significantly reduce GHG emissions from the global food systems. Avoiding land conversion and restoring degraded lands offer large potential GHG emissions reductions and enhance carbon sequestration (Frank et al 2017, Griscom et al 2021). Advances in agronomy (tillage, nutrient, water, weeds, and energy management) and improved breeding also have a large potential to reduce GHG emissions from crop fields (Beach et al 2016, McKinsey 2020). Livestock accounts for up to half of the technical mitigation potential of the agriculture, forestry, and landuse sectors (Herrero et al 2016). Mitigation options in the livestock sector include improved feed and manure management, grazing optimization, development of silvopastoral systems, and reduction in demand for livestock products (Hristov et al 2013a, Grossi et al 2019).Despite the large GHG mitigation potential, limited actions have been implemented to reduce emissions from agriculture. Implementation of many mitigation actions in agriculture identified in nationally determined contributions (NDCs) of developing countries is conditional on technical and financial supports from the bilateral, multilateral and other financing mechanisms (Pauw et al 2020). Even developed countries are relying on a combination of voluntary policies with modest target setting for agriculture (OECD 2019). In addition, the agriculture sector's potential to address climate change is overshadowed by countries' aggregate emission reduction ambition. The mitigation potential of countries providing specific targets for agriculture in their NDCs is about 15% of 2030 business as usual emissions (Richards et al 2016), which is far below the technical as well as the economic potential of emissions reduction from agriculture. Similarly, current climate finance for GHG mitigation from agriculture, forestry, land-use, and natural resource management is very limited, amounting to less than 2% of total global mitigation finance (Buchner 2019). Continued lack of progress in agriculture GHG emissions reduction with modest targets and limited finance could constrain efforts to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 (Gernaat et al 2015, Wollenberg et al 2016).Total GHG mitigation investment in agriculture and allied sectors will likely continue to remain smaller than other sectors (e.g. energy and transportation) for the foreseeable future. Implementation of mitigation actions identified in NDCs and other commitments requires an increase in investment shares over the next decades. One of the reasons for slow progress in GHG emissions reduction in agriculture could be the lack of business cases that can provide a strong basis for public and private investment in mitigation actions. Impact investments can shift public spending and private finance to low-carbon agriculture and support implementing NDCs. The opportunities to mobilize investments in agriculture emissions reduction presented by the Paris Agreement and NDCs are mostly unrealized. One of the main reasons is the lack of a pipeline of business cases to make investment in agricultural GHG mitigation options (Sadler 2016). However, the possibilities for mitigation finance in agriculture include a range of activities in food systems (OECD 2019). Investments for agriculture emissions reduction need to move beyond traditional loans and technical assistance approaches by developing innovative financing mechanisms that can leverage private investments in mitigation actions (WBCSD 2020, USFRA 2021). Little experience and information are currently available about how mitigation investments best support the long-term and widespread adoption of low emission technologies and practices in agriculture and allied sectors.This study assessed investment cases that link field evidence of economic relevance and potential to reduce agricultural GHG emissions by reaching the scale. This paper presents (a) an evaluation of investment cases that hold promise for reducing GHG emissions from the agriculture sector and support mitigation policies, and (b) discusses innovative approaches applied to overcome current barriers in financing in low emissions development agriculture. The assessment focuses on innovative financial mechanisms and instruments that can improve and increase farmers' access to finance and deliver environmental, economic, and social benefits. This study considers five different investment cases in four regions (Southeast Asia-Thailand and Vietnam, South Asia-India, Africa-Kenya, and Latin America-Colombia) and explores possibilities of climate finance for mitigation actions in agriculture and allied sectors in the different agro-ecologies. Investment cases include three major agriculture sub-sectorspaddy rice cultivation, crop nutrient management, and livestock.This assessment selected five investment cases: (a) Thai Rice NAMA (Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action), (b) climate-smart rice production in Vietnam, (c) soil health card (SHC) scheme for crop nutrient management in India, (d) Dairy NAMA in Kenya, and (e) Livestock NAMA in Colombia. This study considered the following four criteria to select the investment cases: (a) it must represent GHG mitigation in the agriculture sector, (b) includes different agriculture-sub sectors that have a large potential to reduce GHG emissions in the region, (c) includes multiple financing sources and instruments, and (d) have linkage to the countries' NDCs submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The authors of this study contributed to generate scientific evidence of many mitigation options considered in the NAMAs (table 1) through the CGIAR research program on climate change, agriculture, and food security (CCAFS). In some cases, authors participated in the stakeholders' consultations events organized by the NAMA preparation teams. However, the authors of this paper were not responsible for the final development of any investment cases considered for this study. Colombia, Kenya, and Thailand developed sub-sector NAMAs with detailed mitigation actions and allocation of finance. These NAMAs consider technologies and practices for scaling and investment that have been tested and evaluated in the field (table 1).Colombia's NAMA proposal includes mitigation options for the livestock (cattle) sector. Restoration of grazing land through silvopastoral systems, manure management, large-scale plantation of forage trees, and avoiding deforestation are key components of Colombia's NAMA for sustainable livestock production (Palmer 2015). Kenya developed a NAMA for its dairy sector to scale up mitigation actions and reach more than 0.6 million dairy farmers (MALF 2017b). This NAMA targets increasing on-farm dairy productivity, reducing high-emissions energy use, and strengthening institutional and farmers' capacities for scaling up low-emission dairy development. The Thai Rice NAMA aims to transform rice production by replacing current practices with more sustainable and less methane-emitting approaches (NAMA Facility 2020). This shift towards low-emissions rice production comprised three key components: technical assistance and training on implementation of new rice cultivation technologies and practices, policy formulation and supporting measures, and investment.Vietnam has raised the agriculture GHG emissions reduction target in its updated NDCs (GoV 2020). Climate-smart rice production can significantly contribute to achieving the mitigation target in Vietnam. The Sustainable Agriculture Transformation project in Vietnam is promoting AWD and rice straw management to enhance rice productivity and emission reduction. GHG mitigation from the agriculture sector is not a priority for India, but its NDC includes a scheme for SHC among its adaptation strategies (GoI 2016). The goal of this scheme is to improve crop-wise nutrient management for individual farms and help farmers to improve crop productivity and reduce the amount of fertilizer applied. Studies indicate that India has the highest excess nitrogen balance in crop fields (Tesfaye et al 2021) and the country can reduce a large amount of GHG emissions with the use of soil health information-based precision nutrient management (Sapkota et al 2021).This study evaluates the selected investment cases in relation to selected sustainability indicators. We considered environmental, economic, and social indicators of mitigation options to evaluate the mitigation options in the investment cases. Environmental indicators include reduction of net GHG emissions (emissions and removals), input use efficiency (i.e. nutrient, water, and energy), and ecosystem services (i.e. improving soil health, water quality, and air pollution). These environmental indicators for agricultural practices and technologies have been evaluated by multiple studies (Aryal et al 2015, Kashangaki and Ericksen 2018, Wilkes et al 2018, Sander et al 2020, Sapkota et al 2021). Some of the indicators, such as improving soil health and long-term preservation of soil carbon, are critical for agricultural productivity and GHG emission reduction (Dickie et al 2014). These interventions increase synergies between mitigation in SDG 13 with efficiencies in water, nutrient, and energy inputs in food production.Economic indicators of sustainability include changes in production and income from the implementation of mitigation options. These indicators offer a strong motivation to farmers and ranchers to implement the mitigation options in their crop and pasture lands, and dairy plants retrofit by dairy companies (Vermeulen et al 2016, Khatri-Chhetri et al 2020b). Contribution to food production and income largely covers processes towards achieving no poverty (SDG 1), zero hunger (SDG 2), and responsible consumption and production (SDG 12). The broader food systems transformation goal integrates both environmental and economic indicators (Campbell et al 2018, Steiner et al 2020). Gender relationships in agriculture production systems can influence the way mitigation options are prioritized, transferred, and adopted (Edmunds et al 2013). The roles and interests may vary for women and men in agriculture, which can lead to different impacts as measured by different sustainability indicators. GHG mitigation options for agriculture must not increase women's drudgery who are already overburdened from agricultural and household activities (Khatri-Chhetri et al 2020a). In many locations, women play a large role in managing irrigation, fertilizer application, manure and crop residue management, livestock feeding, and maintenance of agroforestry systems (Gartaula et al 2020, Wilkes et al 2020a).We evaluated sustainability indicators of the selected mitigation options based on the already published literature. Authors assigned the score 3-0 based on their level of impact on each indicators: 3 = high impact, 2 = medium impact, 1 = low impact, 0 = literature did not evaluate the selected mitigation option for that indicator. This scoring method is consistent with the other studies that evaluated sustainability indicators of climate change adaptation and mitigation options in agriculture and allied sectors (Thornton et al 2018, van Wijk et al 2020).This study assessed the planned/proposed investments in the selected cases and their potential impact on GHG reduction from the agriculture sub-sectors. Investment cases for Thailand and Vietnam focus on emission reduction from paddy rice cultivation. Paddy rice cultivation contributes 55% (27.86 Mt CO 2 eq) and 48% (42.56 Mt CO 2 eq) of the total agriculture emissions in Thailand and Vietnam, respectively (GoV 2017, MNRE 2018). This study presents the mitigation potential of the selected options in the Thai Rice NAMA and climate-smart rice production in Vietnam based on previous estimates and compares them with emission reduction targets set by investment cases.Improving nutrient use efficiency in crop fields is the main objective of the SHC program in India. This program is included in the country's adaptation strategies with a commitment to enhancing investment in climate-vulnerable sectors. Synthetic fertilizer use in crop production is one of the major sources of agricultural emissions in India. There is significant potential to reduce fertilizer-induced GHG emissions from increased N use efficiency and by switching to alternative sources of crop nutrients (Trirado et al 2010). Although India has no target for agricultural emission reduction in its NDC and other domestic policies, it could reduce its GHG emissions from agriculture by almost 18% through the adoption of efficient use of fertilizer, tillage, and water management practices (Sapkota et al 2019). Intensive crop production systems in India have a large excess nitrogen balance in crop fields (Tesfaye et al 2021). This study estimates the impact of the SHC program on GHG reduction in India.The investment cases in Kenya and Colombia consider livestock and pasture land management. Kenya's NAMA focuses on the dairy sector which is responsible for about 12.3 Mt CO 2 eq yr −1 emission (FAO and NZAGRC 2017). The use of a combination of feed practices, dairy plant retrofit, and manure management has a large GHG mitigation potential in Kenya. The livestock sector in Colombia also contributes about 26% of the country's total GHG emissions (IDEAM et al 2016). Cattle farming alone is producing 95% of the livestock sector's emissions. This cattle farming is dependent on the management of more than 34 million ha of pasture land across the country. Colombia is targeting to reduce 13.46 m tCO 2 eq yr −1 emission from the agricultural sector (Tapasco et al 2019). This study assesses the Kenya and Colombia NAMAs and their contribution to achieving the NDC targets.Diversification and catalytic investments for climate actions in agriculture are critical to realizing the GHG mitigation goals and de-risking investment in agriculture programs. This study assesses the types and sources of finance in the selected investment cases. De-risking investment in climate actions enhances public-private partnerships (PPPs) to leverage the financial and technical capacities of different stakeholders and attract additional capital diversifying the risk-return profiles of individual investors (Sadler 2016, Guarnaschelli et al 2018). This also requires building a wide range of financial instruments that can link investors to smallholders and agricultural small and medium enterprises (SMEs). All investment cases were assessed based on their role in (a) developing and improving the mitigation finance environment for agriculture, (b) supporting diversification of finance sources and instruments to implement the mitigation options, and (c) enhancing PPPs.Mitigation options selected by the investment cases have significant GHG emissions reduction and/or carbon sequestration potential in agriculture and allied sectors (table 2). Many researchers in the CGIAR research program on CCAFS have previously evaluated AWD, residue management, laser land leveling, and site-specific nutrient management in agriculture systems, particularly in paddy rice cultivation in India, Thailand, and Vietnam. Studies show that proper use of these agriculture practices can reduce net GHG emissions by increasing input use efficiency and improving soil and water management. The AWD practice significantly reduces GHG emissions by an average of 45% (IPCC 2019). Depending on baseline conditions, this could range from 1 to 5 tCO 2 eq ha −1 season −1 compared to continuous flooding practice (Vo et al 2020). Co-benefits of AWD include lower use of water, fertilizer and seed, and higher resistance to some pests, diseases, and lodging damage (Farnworth et al 2017, Allen andSander 2019).Straw burning or incorporation in fields are common practices in the paddy rice-growing areas. Studies show that in flooded paddy rice, straw incorporation usually stimulates CH 4 production (Jiang et al 2019). However, incorporation of paddy straw into the soil under non-flooded conditions more than 30 d before the next rice season has the potential to increase soil organic carbon and reduce CH 4 emissions during the paddy rice season compared to incorporating the straw in flooded conditions within a short duration (<30 d) before the rice planting season (Sharma et al 2019). Studies also show that a combination of tillage, water, fertilizer, and residue management in paddy rice fields generates large mitigation benefits as well as improvement in productivity and input use efficiency (Sapkota et al 2015, Richards et al 2019). An evaluation of site-specific nutrient management practice in India observed increased rice yield and reduced fertilizer consumption and associated GHG emissions from the rice fields (Sapkota et al 2021). These practices also contribute to economic indicators by increasing farm production and/or income. The change in net income is associated with an increase in crop productivity or decrease in input use by improving input use efficiency.Evaluations of improved feed with fodder production, grazing land management, dairy plant retrofit, and manure management show a large GHG mitigation potential from the livestock sector including economic and social benefits in Kenya and Colombia. The GHG emissions reduction potential of the use of different types of fodder across Kenya ranges from 0.6 to 3.0 Mt CO 2 eq yr −1 (FAO and NZAGRC 2017). Increased feeding of higher quality roughages, such as leguminous fodder, hay, silage, and crop byproducts, as part of balanced feeding programs, can reduce farmers' reliance on concentrate feed, which has a relatively high carbon footprint (Garg et al 2016). Similarly, the implementation of silvopastoral systems in Colombia can reduce GHG emissions by 2.6 tCO 2 eq ha −1 yr −1 compared to the current practices, while increasing agricultural productivity and income (Landholm et al 2019). Other research also suggests that promoting balanced feed rations could provide important opportunities to increase milk production and reduce emission intensity (Wilkes et al 2020b).Dairy processing plants use a large amount of energy, mainly electricity and fossil fuels, for cooling and storage, pasteurization, evaporation, and drying activities. Improvement in energy use efficiency in the major dairy processing plants in Kenya can reduce emissions by 0.14 Mt CO 2 eq yr −1 including a large cost saving (Wilkes et al 2018). Most milk losses in the dairy sector in Kenya occur at the production and processing stages, as milk is transported from farmer to cooperative and to local processors. The estimated GHG emission reductions from minimizing the loss in milk cooling centers and dairy cooperatives in Kenya were 1.7 and 1.2 Mt CO 2 eq yr −1 , respectively (Gromko and Abdurasulova 2018). Some selected mitigation options in the investment cases such as site-specific nutrient management, fodder production, restoring grazing lands, and manure management provide co-benefit of ecosystem services. They help to minimize nutrient run-off from the agriculture and pasture lands, improve water quality and soil health, and reduce air pollution.Given the existing gender inequalities in agriculture, the outcomes of mitigation investment might not be equally beneficial to women and men. In smallholder households across Kenya and Colombia, women play a predominant role in cattle feeding, milking, cleaning, and, to some extent, delivery of milk to the market and milk collection centers (Kristjanson et al 2014, Gallina 2016). Men tend to have a larger role in activities related to animal health, such as artificial insemination, seeking veterinary treatment, and the sale of live animals and animal products. Investment in improved feed with fodder production, manure management and restoring grazing land through silvopastoral livestock system can reduce women's drudgery in livestock production. But overall gender impact of mitigation options depends on women and men's roles not only in agriculture production but also in decision-making over input supply and marketing (Wilkes et al 2020a).The amount of investment in the selected cases ranged from US$ 68 million over 5 years to US$ 1100 million over 10 years. All investment cases target reaching a certain number of farmers and/or areas under the mitigation options, SMEs, and/or dairy processing facilities (table 3). Thailand's NAMA Support Project (NSP) targets reaching 100 000 farmers and supports 420 service providers. The project provides capacity-building training to the farmers on how to implement mitigation technologies and sustainable best practices in paddy rice production. This investment also supports the implementation of a new voluntary standard to verify rice sustainability, including farmers' safety, labor rights, and the application of low-emissions practices. The project envisioned to boost farmers' income by applying appropriate technologies and effective inputs management for paddy rice production (saving water, energy, fertilizer, and pesticides, etc) and facilitating the sale of low-emissions rice. The NSP anticipates reducing baseline emissions by more than 26% from irrigated rice fields, which is about 1.66 Mt CO 2 eq over 5 years.The low-emission and climate-resilient dairy development proposal aims to transform Kenya's dairy sector by improving on-farm dairy productivity, reducing high-emission energy use, and strengthening the capacities of national institutions and stakeholders for upscaling good dairy management practices. The project targets 153 000 dairy farming households and 151 dairy processing facilities and aims to support 20 000 households to adopt biogas over 10 years. The project plan to cover about 17% of the total population of dairy farmers in Kenya with 50% women beneficiaries and generate 12 000 new jobs in the dairy processing sector. Over the 10 years implementation period, the estimated total emission reduction is 8.08 Mt CO 2 eq from increased dairy productivity (4.14 Mt CO 2 eq), energy efficiency in dairy processing facilities (2.96 Mt CO 2 eq), and household biogas adoption (0.98 Mt CO 2 eq).The livestock NAMA proposal from the Colombian government targets to save a large amount of GHG emissions (more than a billion tCO 2 eq), while protecting forests, regenerating pasture and degraded lands, and boosting income from the livestock sector. The program aims to reduce 4 Mt CO 2 eq by enteric fermentation, capture 6 Mt CO 2 eq by the silvopastoral system, and up to 167 Mt CO 2 eq by restored ecosystems, and mitigate 1228 Mt CO 2 eq from the avoided deforestation of 2.5 M ha of forest in the country. These emissions reduction and carbon sequestration target to restore a total of 1.6 M ha of grazing land through intensive and non-intensive silvopastoral livestock systems, and plant over 2 million ha with improved and nutritious forage trees in the degraded pasture and other lands.The increasing amount of chemical fertilizer consumption with low fertilizer use efficiency (<50%) is one of the major concerns for sustainable agriculture development in India (Fishman et al 2016). The imbalanced application of different types of chemical fertilizer remains a widespread problem in many locations in the country. The government is also facing the rising cost of fertilizer subsidies, and this subsidy leading to excess nutrient application, largely nitrogen fertilizer, in many crops. The government of India has launched the SHC program in 2015 to provide fertilizer use recommendations to the farmers based on nutrient availability in their soils. The initial estimated investment for the program was US$ 85 million to reach 140 million farmers across the country. The program used US$ 107.5 million from 2015 to 2020 to develop soil testing infrastructure, soil sample collection, and testing, and distribution of SHCs to over 150 million farmers throughout India (MAFW 2020). This program established 9285 new Soil Testing Labs and promoted village-level soil testing facilities run by agri-entrepreneurs. Studies indicate that soil health schemes in India promoted sustainable farming leading to a decrease of chemical fertilizer use by 8%-10% and an average increase in crop yield by 5% (MAFW 2020). This reduction of fertilizer use is equivalent to 7.34-9.18 Mt CO 2 eq at the current level of N fertilizer use (17.63 Mt). Another estimate indicates that India can reduce 17.52 Mt CO 2 yr −1 through efficient fertilizer management in the crops across the country (Sapkota et al 2021).National Agriculture Extension Center (NAEC) under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) of Vietnam is promoting climatesmart rice production across the country to minimize the cost of cultivation, enhance productivity and reduce GHG emissions from paddy rice cultivation. The Government of Vietnam plans to convert 1.2 million ha of conventional paddy rice cultivation to climate-smart production by 2030 using only domestic resources (MONRE 2015). This program promotes changes in rice varieties, soil/ water management practices, crop establishment methods, residue management, and reducing postharvest losses. Vietnam's updated NDC (2020) has raised the agriculture-GHG mitigation target by 16 m tCO 2 eq, which will be mainly achieved through emission reduction in rice cultivation. The climatesmart rice cultivation efforts target to promote AWD on 0.2 million ha and mid-season drainage on to 1 million ha rice fields by 2030 contributing 65% of the agriculture sector's annual mitigation potential. Straw and fertilizer management can further reduce the GHG emission from the paddy rice fields.The Thai Rice NAMA is a joint project funded by NAMA Facility and the Thai Government to encourage smallholder farmers to implement low emissions technologies and practices in paddy rice cultivation. The NSP works with farmers, farmers' associations, and external service providers to develop incentive schemes and financial support. The NAMA Facility approved US$ 17.3 million for this project and Thai Governments committed to leverage an additional US$ 27.7 million per year to the project (table 4). The NSP expects to generate an additional US$ 23.8 million direct financial investment from the private sector. The funding from the NAMA facility is provided through the subsidized loans program implemented by the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC). The funding from the Thai Government covers the costs of agriculture extension services to promote the adoption of low-emissions paddy rice Reaching millions of smallholder dairy farmers in rural areas with financial support is one of the major challenges in Kenya. The State Department of Livestock aims to catalyze investments of US$ 223 million in Kenya's dairy sector from various sources of finance. The project proposes financial contributions from various sources, such as the Green Climate Fund (25%), commercial financial institutions (48%), the dairy private sector (19%), a multilateral donor partner (6.5%), and the Government of Kenya (1%). This is a unique example of how different financial sources can be combined to support climate change mitigation with agricultural development objectives. This investment case plans to use a loan from the Green Climate Fund to leverage private investment from financial institutions, dairy plants, and farmers in the implementation of mitigation actions in the dairy sector.Kenya's NAMA investment case uses a variety of financing instruments for the provision of finance to dairy sector stakeholders. The program supports commercial banks and microcredit institutions to provide affordable loans to dairy cooperatives and farmers, including support with capacity building on financial management. Commercial fodder and hay producers can receive financial assistance (concessional loans) for investments in commercial hay production and marketing. Dairy cooperatives and processing plants can also access concessional loans to leverage credit finance from commercial banks for clean energy technologies. Farmers can pursue blended grants and loan finance to overcome the high initial costs of installing biogas digesters at the household level. The funding also leverages investment by private sector dairy processors in dairy extension services to promote the adoption of climate-resilient and low-emissions dairy management practices, with the Government of Kenya and a donor partner financing coordination and management of the program.The Colombian Government is seeking international partners and financial support to implement livestock NAMA. The estimated cost of this project is US$ 1100 million, including prioritized investments: US$ 926 M; implementation: US$ 147 M; knowledge management: US$ 13 M; MRV system: US$ 15 M. The MARD of Colombia (Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural de Colombia) is in charge to develop this proposal and coordinating with potential funding partners and developing financing instruments. This livestock NAMA has a direct relation with Colombia's Coffee NAMA that aims to establish an agroforestry system, and with Forestry NAMA that seeks to restore degraded land and reforestation.The SHC scheme in India is entirely funded by the Government of India. The cost of interventions under the scheme is shared between the central and the state governments (75:25 ratio). This scheme allocates a large amount of funds to renovate and improve existing soil testing facilities and the establishment of new soil testing labs (static, mobile, and mini-labs) through the existing agriculture extension program. Staff from the State Department of Agriculture and Agriculture Universities involve to implement the scheme. Investment in soil testing labs is also done by private companies under the privatepublic partnership model with subsidy funding from the government. This scheme promotes private agrientrepreneurs for building village-level soil testing facilities for timely distribution of high-quality soil test results to the small and marginal farmers.Climate-smart rice production in Vietnam is promoted by the NAEC with funding from MARD. This is entirely a public investment model in which Government's agriculture development fund is allocated to develop training materials on climate-smart rice production for extension staff and rice farmers. The MARD coordinates to bring the experts from the various agencies to develop training modules and provide training to the agriculture extension staff. This program also supports private sector business development by leveraging a national green credit program for capital investment to provide mitigation technology services to paddy rice farmers. An additional 27% (25.8 Mt CO 2 eq) reduction in agricultural emissions has been designated for international (conditional) funding. The internationally funded NDC actions in rice include converting an additional 1.5 million ha to AWD and 1 million ha to integrated crop management (ICM) which is expected to reduce annual emissions by 9.86 Mt CO 2 eq by 2030.Five investment cases considered in this study have a strong scientific base to invest in GHG mitigation impacts. The Thai Rice NAMA and climatesmart rice production in Vietnam used scientific evidence generated from a long research collaboration between government agriculture departments, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), and other national and international research organizations. This collaboration evaluated low emission paddy rice production technologies (i.e. AWD, midseason drainage, laser land leveling, straw management, and site-specific nutrient management) in different locations of Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam (Vu et al 2015, Kantachote et al 2016, Thu et al 2016, Tariq et al 2017, Trinh et al 2017, Chidthaisong et al 2018, Tran et al 2018). A consortium composed of the Thai Rice Department, The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, IRRI, and other rice-based public/private partners developed the NAMA proposal integrating field evidence of mitigation technologies and practices. IRRI has contributed estimation of the mitigation potential from the implementation of climate-smart rice cultivation practices. A suitability mapping for AWD and an investment plan for low-emission rice production developed by IRRI and CCAFS in collaboration with national partners also contribute to the design planning and implementation of the climate-smart rice production program in Vietnam to meet the agricultural NDC targets (Nelson et al 2015, Tran et al 2019).Imbalance use of crop nutrients, excess application of nitrogen fertilizer in many places, and low nutrient use efficiency are major concerns for sustainable agriculture production in India. Studies indicate that the increasing environmental loss of nitrogen is enhancing GHG emissions from the crop fields (Moring et al 2021, Sapkota et al 2021). The annual fertilizer consumption, particularly fertilizer nitrogen, has been continuously increasing in India requiring more and more government subsidies in fertilizer. The nutrient use efficiency of cropping systems in India (expressed in yield per unit of nitrogen input) decreased from 55% in 1960 to 35% in 2010 (Singh 2017). The SHC scheme in India was introduced in 2015 to promote the balanced use of crop nutrients based on nutrients available in the soil and improvement in nutrient use efficiency. Under this scheme, 93 million SHCs based on test results of 23.6 million soil samples and area-general fertilizer recommendations have already been distributed to farmers (Kishore et al 2021). However, preparing a meaningful fertilizer recommendation ahead of each planting season for such a large number of SHC holders with limited soil testing facilities and capacity is a major challenge for the government of India. The government extension system should focus on adequately educating farmers on what soil test data mean and how to use these in terms of meeting the nutrient requirement of crops through the adoption of various precision nutrient management strategies. Many recent studies in India also provide ample scientific evidence of increasing nutrient use efficiency by the application of balanced nutrients combined with tillage and water management practices (Buresh et al 2019, Jat et al 2019, Sapkota et al 2021).Kenya's Dairy NAMA proposal intends to implement low-emission, climate-resilient, and productivity-enhancing options in the dairy sector. This is reinforced by the scientific evidence of mitigation potential and economic viability. Recent studies estimate GHG emission reduction potential from livestock feed management and breed improvement (FAO and NZAGRC 2017), retrofitting dairy processing plants (Wilkes et al 2018), installing biogas plants for manure management (MALF 2017b), and reducing milk loss and waste (Gromko and Abdurasalova 2018) in Kenya. CCAFS worked with the State Department for Livestock and national stakeholders to develop the NAMA proposal, and national agencies further supported the integration of the proposed actions in Kenya's national climate change action plan and NDC (Government of Kenya 2020). It is hoped that explicit integration of the Dairy NAMA in national policies can strengthen the country's ability to attract international investment.The NAMA for livestock was informed by scientific evidence of low emission livestock development in Colombia. Studies show that the use of improved feed in a combination of fodder and grasses can reduce enteric methane emissions from cattle in Colombia (Ruden et al 2018, Arango et al 2020). Colombia's livestock federation also uses these results to strengthen its sustainable livestock strategy and improve pasture lands. Reducing deforestation and the implementation of silvopastoral systems have large emission reduction potential while increasing livestock productivity and restoration of degraded landscapes (Landholm et al 2019). The Climate-smart agriculture profile of Colombia indicates that agroforestry, silvopastoral systems, and grassland management are the key interventions for climate change adaptation, mitigation, and productivity benefits for livestock farmers in Colombia (World Bank, CIAT, CATIE 2014). Recommendations of these scientific studies were incorporated to design the mitigation strategies in the livestock NAMA.The five investment cases integrate multiple financial sources and instruments that offer a return for investors in various forms. Governments are the main source of finance in all cases that leverage funds to support farmers' capacity strengthening and business development opportunities for private sector service providers in agriculture. The return on investment for government finance includes social welfare and economic growth that is difficult to account in a balance sheet. Financial institutions and the private sectors are the key investors in Thai Rice NAMA and the Dairy sector NAMA in Kenya. In Thailand, the private sector invests to provide mitigation technology services to farmers such as laser land leveling, AWD, site-specific nutrient management, and straw/stubble management on a large scale, and in turn, generate revenue. Business case assessments of these mitigation options also indicate promising opportunities for private sector investment (Tran et al 2019, World Bank 2019).In Kenya, financial institutions and private dairy plants invest in three commercially viable projectsinformation services, fodder supply, and dairy plant retrofit. Farmers, dairy cooperatives, and dairy processing plants are the key user of loan money in the dairy NAMA project. Studies also indicate that fodder supply and dairy plant retrofit are business cases viable for private sector investment in Kenya (Dijk et al 2018, Gromko and Abdurasalova 2018, Kashangaki and Ericksen 2018, Wilkes et al 2018). Investment in soil health testing mini and micro laboratories is an economically viable investment in India. Private investors charge fees in return for service provision. These examples set cases for impact investing to make investments in commercial projects, companies, or farmers that create sustainable impact and offer a return for investors.Only Vietnam has an explicit agricultural sector emission reduction target in its NDC. Colombia, Kenya, and Thailand include economy-wide targets to reduce total GHG emissions in their NDCs (table 5). Agriculture mitigation in Kenya's NDC aims to scale-out climate-smart agriculture with emphasis on an efficient livestock management system including feed, breed, and value chain of livestock products (MoEF 2020). The promotion of improved agroforestry systems and reduction in deforestation are key actions included in Colombia's NDC. Thailand excludes land use, land-use change, and forestry in its NDC but domestic policies include reforestation, forest conservation, rehabilitation of watershed areas, and tree plantation in the degraded lands (ONEP 2015). India has no emission reduction target for agriculture but there are a few actions included in its NDC, such as solarization of irrigation pumps, promotion of biogas digesters, use of SHC for crop nutrient management, and afforestation and forest management, that support GHG emissions reduction from the agriculture and allied sectors.Table 6 presents the mitigation potential of the agriculture sub-sector included in the investment cases. Improved paddy rice cultivation in Thailand and Vietnam can contribute up to 8.08 and 12.12 Mt CO 2 yr −1 emission reduction, respectively (Roe et al 2021). This mitigation potential may differ with the method of estimation and type of mitigation options included for emission reduction. These are ambitious mitigation targets for rice cultivation but they are possible. For example, AWD and midseason drainage on 1.2 million ha can achieve 65% of Vietnam's unconditional mitigation goal for the agriculture sector with an average net benefit of US$ 193 ha −1 (Tran et al 2019). While the mitigation from an additional 1.5 million ha converted to AWD and 1 million ha of ICM is a sizeable contribution of 38% towards Vietnam's conditional mitigation target from the agriculture sector, a considerable amount of mitigation still needs to be achieved by other agricultural actions. The average emission reduction cost of AWD ranges from US$ −17 to −24.6 per tCO 2 eq (Escobar et al 2019). Investment cases in Thailand and Vietnam combine AWD with laser land leveling, straw management, and management of fertilizer application that can further contribute to GHG reduction without a decrease in yields and income from paddy rice cultivation.India can realize a large gain from a small improvement in fertilizer use efficiency by the application of precision nutrient management based on the information provided in the SHC. The GHG mitigation potential of reduced fertilizer N consumption due to the adoption of precision nutrient management technologies in India is 17.5 Mt CO 2 yr −1 with a cost saving of US$ 91 per tCO 2 (Sapkota et al 2019). Increasing efficiency in fertilizer use can generate both economic and environmental benefits for the country. Currently, India allocates more than US$ 8 billion in fertilizer subsidy (2020-21). For example, 8%-10% reduction in fertilizer use with the application of SHC information can save about one billion US$ subsidy and reduce 7.34-9.18 Mt CO 2 eq emissions.Kenya's dairy sector emissions reduction potential ranges from 2.28 to 12.98 Mt CO 2 yr −1 (FAO 2017). Low-cost options include improved feed with the use of fodder and grasses and reducing milk loss and waste in collection and cooling centers. Key GHG mitigation options for the livestock sector in Kenya are improved feed with fodder and hay production (1.57 Mt CO 2 eq yr −1 ), manure management using biogas plants (0.09 Mt CO 2 eq yr −1 ), breed improvement (1.2 Mt CO 2 eq yr −1 ), dairy processing plants retrofit (0.14 Mt CO 2 eq yr −1 ), and reduction of milk loss and waste (2.9 Mt CO 2 eq yr −1 ). The cost of GHG emissions abatement using these options ranges from US$ −63/tCO 2 (improved feed) to US$ +80/tCO 2 (dairy processing plants retrofit) (Khatri-Chetri et al 2020). These estimates show that Kenya has a large potential to reduce GHG emissions from the livestock sector with cost-saving benefits.The GHG mitigation potential from reforestation and grazing land management in Colombia is 325.2 and 2.87 Mt CO 2 yr −1 , respectively (Griscom et al 2021). Well-managed silvopastoral systems in the country can improve overall productivity, carbon sequestration and provide additional economic benefits for livestock farmers. Carbon sequestration rates of silvopastoral systems vary between 1.0 and 5.0 tonnes carbon ha −1 yr −1 depending on the climate, soil conditions, pasture type, and tree species (Ibrahim et al 2009). Colombia has 34.4 million ha of pasture lands of which 30% are classified as unmanaged (DANE 2014). Expansion of silvopastoral systems and improved management of unmanaged pastures offer synergies in both GHG mitigation and adaptation benefits in the country.Five investment cases evaluated in this study provide good examples of addressing gaps in mitigation finance by leveraging funds from different sources, bundling financial instruments, and investing in mitigation options that also provide adaptation benefits. Thai rice NAMA and Kenya's dairy NAMA aim to address the financing gap for GHG mitigation by channeling additional sources of finance. They integrate blended finance and PPP to increase private sector investment in mitigation options. They also target unlocking commercial credit using blended finance mechanisms. These two projects use grants to offer technical assistance to loan beneficiaries and local financial institutions, partnering with climate finance institutions (e.g. Green Climate Fund and NAMA facility) to establish a concessional credit line for commercial banks, and guaranteeing the loan portfolio for private sector investors. This helps to de-risk investments and catalyzes private capital by standardizing requirements of public capital, realigning returns, and leveraging expectation (by guarantees, subsidized interest rate, or offsetting the cost of capital), and increasing the effective application of risk reduction tools (Millan et al 2019).Government finance in climate-smart rice cultivation in Vietnam and SHC scheme in India also inspire private sectors' investment. The SHC scheme in India promotes private agri-entrepreneurs for building mobile/mini soil testing labs and village-level soil testing facilities with co-investment. Livestock NAMA of Colombia plans to develop a public-private financing alliance including the National Federation of Cattle Ranchers, Global Environment Fund, and bilateral and multilateral financing institutions. In all investment cases, integration of diverse financial sources is not only supporting to leverage finance but also expertise and capabilities for diversifying, managing, and rebalancing risk-return profiles. This coordination of finance also aligns mitigation funds with development assistance and guides investment to better target strategic needs. They also followed a widely used project-based approach which is easy to implement and monitor performances. An effective way to utilize mitigation finance in agriculture is to bundle one or more financial instruments with technical assistance (Sadler et al 2016). Investment cases considered in this study are using a variety of financing instruments, such as the provision of subsidized loans, grants, guarantees for loans, and technical assistance facilities, to offer more comprehensive solutions to financial institutions and other stakeholders to help improve mitigation financing. The bundling of several instruments at a time may increase the efficiency of resource use and reduce the risk of investment.Mitigation measures in agriculture must provide direct benefits to farmers and other value chain actors and contribute to agriculture development, food security, and trade to gain policy supports and investment (Wollenberg andNegra 2011, Dickie et al 2014). The evaluation of sustainability indicators of investment cases revealed a large economic benefit to the farmers by improving farm productivity, input use efficiency, and income. These are some of the key indicators of building resilient agriculture to climate change. In the absence of incentives for GHG reduction to the farmers and other value chain actors, these benefits can motivate them to invest in mitigation options in agriculture.Achieving the target of limiting global warming, SDGs and net-zero emissions requires a combination of policies, incentives and technical supports, and coordination of actions across multiple stakeholders. Low emission agriculture development will not be possible without significantly increasing the amount of investment in mitigation actions across the regions and agriculture sub-sectors. But, access to finance for climate action in agriculture is a major challenge due to low investment priority and reluctance of global and national financial institutions. This paper evaluated innovative financial mechanisms and instruments that integrate climate finance, agriculture development budgets, and private sector investments to improve and increase farmers' and other value chain actors' access to finance while delivering environmental, economic, and social benefits. This assessment of investment cases provides rich information to design and implement mitigation actions in agriculture through unlocking additional sources of public and private capital, strengthening the links between financial institutions, farmers, and agribusiness, and coordination of actions across multiple stakeholders. These investment cases could help to develop new finance mechanisms that meet the needs of a large number of smallholder farmers and SMEs to implement the mitigation options.The innovative financial mechanisms and instruments used in the investment cases can accommodate the different risks-return profiles of all stakeholders of the project. For instance, Thai Rice and Kenya Dairy NAMAs are using layered capital structures to meet the risk appetite of each of their investors. Climatesmart rice production program in Vietnam and SHC scheme in India promote PPP model to leverage private capital in climate actions. All investment cases expand support for existing agricultural best practices, integrate forestry and agricultural actions to avoid land-use change, and support the transition to market-based solutions. These are the promising investment cases that can be replicated to facilitate the rapid advancement and scaling-up of climate finance in agriculture and allied sectors."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3760454005.json b/main/part_2/3760454005.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2fe92cb0e54d5f31128c3151e0a3ab864c18856f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3760454005.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2642a59dbb4a5e810e5617a67ed65e4d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ac0b8ca4-f71d-4b01-9627-24fc4b9efdf4/retrieve","id":"-1408569665"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d2fede39-442c-41ab-9868-2d7b121b05c6","content":"The benchmarking and monitoring of rice production performance indicators are essential for improving rice production self-sufficiency, increasing profitability, reducing labor requirements, optimizing fertilizer inputs, engaging youths in rice production, and increasing the overall sustainability of smallholder rice production systems in countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In this paper, we quantified five sustainability performance indicators (grain yield, net profit, labor productivity, and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) use efficiencies) to benchmark rice production systems in SSA. Data were collected between 2013-2014 from 2907 farmers from two rice production systems (irrigated and rainfed lowlands) across five agroecological zones (arid, semiarid, humid, subhumid and highlands) in 12 countries (Benin,Rice is one of the most important basic crops in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The rice sector is considered as an engine for economic growth in SSA, as it has the potential to contribute to creating wealth and jobs, ensuring food security, reducing economic migration from Africa, and ensuring social stability (Seck et al., 2012). However, these potential benefits remain unrealized despite the existence of national objectives in SSA countries targeted at achieving rice self-sufficiency.Many countries in SSA have made significant efforts to increase domestic rice productivity and production by encouraging the adoption of new and improved varieties and good agricultural practices. Consequently, 71 % increase in paddy rice production during 2007-2012 was attributed to yield increases, and 29 % was attributed to harvested-area expansion (Saito et al., 2015). However, between 2012 and 2018, the increase in yield was only 1.19 % annually, compared to an annual increase of 1.47 % between 2007 and 2012 (Arouna et al., 2021a). Despite the various policies implemented to boost local production, especially after the 2007/2008 global food crisis, local production in SSA has not been sufficient to meet the increasing demands of the population.Although significant efforts and investments had been made in rice research and development over the past 50 years, rice production in SSA is still characterized by low productivity. The average yield in 2018 in the region was approximately 2.28 t ha − 1 , compared to the average of 4.61 t ha − 1 in Asia (USDA, 2020). The region has an exploitable yield gap of 2− 10 t ha -1 (Dossou-Yovo et al., 2020). In SSA, the low yield constitutes one of the main challenges of rice production and is attributed to several factors. Among these, poor agricultural practices including land preparation, seed, crop establishment, nutrient management, and weed management limit on-farm yield (Dossou-Yovo et al., 2020;Niang et al., 2017;Saito et al., 2015;Tanaka et al., 2015Tanaka et al., , 2017)). In addition, abiotic, biotic and socioeconomic constraints have been frequently reported to reduce rice yield in both irrigated and rainfed production environments (Diagne et al., 2013), especially with the increasing negative effect of climate change (van Oort and Zwart, 2017). However, apart from grain yield (Niang et al., 2017;Tanaka et al., 2017), little information is available for the benchmarking of performance indicators (PIs), e.g., the labor productivity, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and phosphorus use efficiency (PUE), of rice production systems in SSA. These PIs are among those defined by the Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP) for sustainability of rice production (SRP, 2015). These PIs are also included in a framework of agronomic gain key PIs, which was recently proposed by Excellence in Agronomy 2030 Initiative (Saito et al., 2021). Sustainable rice production requires the improvement and optimization of these PIs without major trade-off among them (Devkota et al., 2019(Devkota et al., , 2020;;SRP, 2015). In SSA countries, maintaining and improving the sustainability of smallholder rice production is important for achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), i.e. end poverty (SDG #1), end hunger, achieve food security and improve nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture (SDG #2), gender equality (SDG #5), ensure sustainable consumption and production pattern (SDG #12), take urgent action to combat climate change and its impact (SDG #13) (UNDP, 2017). Quantifying the PIs of rice production is important for closing large yield and profit gaps through optimal resource use. Additionally, assessment of such PIs is required in order to establish intervention priorities (baseline/benchmarking and target), provide specific recommendations and practical guidelines to drive improvements in crop production systems and monitor progress due to agronomic interventions or policy supports over time and location. Thus, the objective of this paper is to assess the PIs for sustainable rice production across countries, production systems and agroecological zones (AEZ) in SSA.For brevity, aligning with this special issue, this paper focuses on five farm-level economic and environmental indicators that rice agronomic interventions significantly addressed, namely, grain yield, net profit, labor productivity, NUE and PUE in SSA as a case study. The contribution of this paper to the literature is twofold. First, the quantification and comparison of rice production indicators are essential for improving the sustainability of smallholder rice production systems in SSA. Although such quantitative assessments for other parts of the world have been published in the literature (Devkota et al., 2019), studies that quantify rice production PIs in SSA are scarce. Literature exists on assessment of grain yield across rice growing environments in SSA (Tanaka et al., 2017;Niang et al., 2017;Senthilkumar et al., 2020), labor productivity and NUE in farmers' fields in a few sites (Paresys et al., 2018;Wopereis et al., 1999). However, studies assessing trade-off among indicators (labor productivity, net profit, NUE and PUE) and with the aim of making rice production system sustainable at major rice production countries and AEZ in SSA are lacking. Second, our assessment is more holistic with wider geographical coverage (12 countries), two production systems based on water conditions and management practices (irrigated and rainfed lowlands), five AEZs, and three farmer categories based on yield performance. Unlike the existing literature, which is focused mainly on irrigated and intensively managed rice production systems (Devkota et al., 2020), this study compares rice production in both irrigation and rainfed lowland systems with sub-optimal crop and input management practices. These two perspectives lead to policy and management recommendations as well as suggestions for future research directions to improve the sustainability of rice production and achieve rice self-sufficiency in SSA.This study used data collected by Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) for the 2013-2014 growing season from rice sector development hubs in 12 countries in SSA (Benin, Cameroon, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Madagascar, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tanzania and Togo) (Fig. 1). Rice sector development hubs are the main rice production areas where rice research innovations are integrated across the rice value chain to achieve development outcomes and impacts (Zossou et al., 2017). The number of rice sector development hubs per country was selected by National Agricultural Research System (NARS) partners based on the main production system and the quantity of rice produced. The survey for this study was conducted in one or two hubs (hereinafter referring as site) in each country depending on the production systems (irrigated lowland; IL and rainfed lowland; RL). In six countries (Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Madagascar, Mali, Nigeria, and Togo), data were collected from two hubs (one IL production system and one RL production system). Data were collected from one hub in the other six countries, i.e., two countries (Niger and Senegal) with IL and four countries (Benin, Cameroon, Sierra Leone, and Tanzania) with RL. Therefore, data were collected at 18 site-production system combinations (the IL in 8 countries and the RL in 10 countries). The 18 rice production systems were in 5 AEZ (arid, semiarid, humid, subhumid and highlands) (Fig. 1).A multistage random sampling technique was used to select farmers to interview. In the first stage, a list of all villages that produce rice using the main production system of each hub was obtained. In each hub, the number of villages sampled was proportional to the total number of villages, and the sampled villages were randomly selected. A list of all rice farmers in each selected village was collected with the help of extension agents and national partners. Ten farmers were randomly selected from each village. In total, data from 2907 rice farmers in 12 countries were included in the analysis. Of the 2907 farmers analyzed in this paper, 1011 cultivated rice in IL, and 1896 cultivated rice in RL production system (Table 1).Characterization of rice production inputs in irrigated lowland production systems and in irrigated versus rainfed lowland production systems in SSA countries. The same letter indicates no significant difference at the 5% level. Values in parenthesis are standard deviations. The dominant cropping system in IL is rice-rice.Data collection was performed using tablets, and the data were sent via a web-based application to a central database managed by AfricaRice that allows online access to NARS partners. As data validation rules were imposed, the tablet-based data collection avoided many biases associated with paper-based questionnaires, such as mistakes in recording answers, changed values of variables, mistakes in recoding text answers for numerical variables, etc. Data were collected using a structured and pre-tested questionnaire. The household data collected included socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and information necessary to estimate the net profit, labor productivity, grain yield, NUE and PUE of the farms. Farmers were asked to recall information about field size per household, the quantity and price of all inputs (seed, fertilizer, insecticides, labor, equipment, etc.) and output (paddy rice) from the previous rainy season. The data were collected by enumerators who were trained and supervised by NARS partners and AfricaRice staff.Out of the 12 SRP indicators, the five PIs related to farm-level rice production were considered and included, viz., grain yield, net profit, labor productivity, NUE, and PUE (SRP, 2015). The net profit, labor productivity and grain yield were calculated for all 12 countries, and the NUE and PUE were calculated for 6 countries (i.e., Cote d'Ivoire, Mali, Togo, Niger, Senegal and Benin) because N and P fertilizer were not applied or were applied only at very low levels in the other countries. All the PIs were computed for the two rice production systems (IL and RL) and across five AEZ (arid, semiarid, humid, subhumid and highlands). The net profits were calculated by considering total costs, including inputs (seed, fertilizers, herbicides, irrigation water, and pesticides), machinery rental, equipment, land rental (if any), labor (family and hired) for seedling preparation, seeding, land preparation, crop establishment, weed management, fertilizer application, irrigation, harvesting, threshing, cleaning, and drying operations. The gross income was computed based on the grain yield and market price. To reduce the effect of price variability on the net profit, average price per hub was used. Then, the net profit was derived by deducting total costs from the gross income. Grain yield was estimated by dividing the total rice production by the rice area and expressed as tons per hectare (t ha − 1 ). Labor productivity was computed by dividing the grain yield by the total number of labor days required for one hectare of rice production and was expressed as kg grain labor day − 1 . To calculate the PUE, the total P 2 O 5 content of the fertilizers was multiplied by a factor of 0.4364 to convert it into the amount of elemental P (Devkota et al., 2019). The total harvested grain yield was divided by the elemental N or P value, and the NUE and PUE were expressed in terms of kg grain kg − elemental N or P. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests were used to test the differences in the PIs among countries and production systems, respectively.To estimate the yield gaps, farmers were categorized into three classes based on grain yield: the top decile (top 10 %), middle (middle %) and bottom decile (bottom 10 %). Following Stuart et al. (2016), the exploitable yield gap was computed as the difference between the grain yield of the top decile and the mean grain yield of all farmers, and the yield gap percentage was estimated by dividing this difference by the yield of the top decile. Using the same percentile categories of the yield, the values of the gaps for the other PIs (net profit, labor productivity, NUE and PUE) were calculated. The values of the PIs are displayed as frequency distributions indicating the top, middle and bottom percentile values. A correlation analysis was conducted to assess the relationships between the five PIs and inputs use. For NUE and PUE, the optimal values were customized for the SSA countries by modifying the values as proposed by Devkota et al. (2019) for East Asia, Dobermann and Fairhurst (2000) for rice production, and EU Nitrogen Expert Panel (2015) for improving NUE. Accordingly, the range 30-100 kg grain kg − elemental N was set as optimal values for NUE, NUE < 30 as high elemental N application (wasteful), and > 100 low application (mining The same letter indicates no significant difference at the 5% level. Values in parenthesis are the standard deviations. The dominant cropping system in RL is rice-fallow.soil nutrients); similarly 100-400 kg grain kg − 1 elemental P as optimal range for PUE, PUE < 100 as wasteful application, and > 400 as low (mining soil nutrients). The upper and lower boundary values for desirable NUE (100 and 30) and PUE (400 and 100) proposed for 12 African countries are similar to those for East Asian countries (100 and 30 NUE, and 350 and 100 PUE) (Devkota et al., 2019(Devkota et al., , 2021)). It is noted that the method used here for computation of NUE and PUE does not account for the indigenous soil N and P supplies, nutrient from mineralization, organic fertilizers use, and fertilizers from irrigation water. Further, nitrogen inputs from biological nitrogen fixation (Ladha and Reddy, 2003) has not been accounted for. It is known that due to anaerobic conditions in flooded paddy fields, indigenous soil N and P supplies were maintained even without the use of fertilizers in long-term trials in the Philippines (Chivenge et al., 2020;Dobermann et al., 2000;Ishii et al., 2011). We recognize that assessment of indigenous soil N and P supplies is essential for generating site-specific nutrient management practices. However, this assessment and calculation of nutrient use efficiencies using indigenous soil N and P supplies are beyond the scope of this study.To establish intervention priorities, normalized spider diagrams were created to indicate the trade-offs among the five PIs and the inputs used in both production systems and the three yield gap categories (bottom 10 %, middle 80 % and top 10 %) in each country. These tradeoffs were compared to make country-specific recommendations for high-priority interventions to close the gaps in yield, net profit, labor productivity, NUE and PUE.The average rice area per household was significantly smaller in IL production system (1.24 ha) than in RL production system (2.25 ha) (Table 1). Although the percentage of farmers using certified seeds (25 %) was the same in both production systems, the quantity of seeds used was higher in IL (84 kg ha − 1 ) than in RL (71 kg ha − 1 ). Only 40 % of farmers in both production systems used herbicides and 26 % and 48 % used mechanical weeding (e.g. rotary weeder) in RL and IL, respectively.An average of 90 labor days ha -1 was used in rice production in the two production systems. On average, 61 % of farmers in RL and 44 % in IL do not apply N or apply <2 kg N ha − 1 to rice, while up to 74 % of farmers in RL and 55 % in IL do not apply P or apply <1 kg P ha − 1 to rice. However, higher quantities of N, P and K fertilizers were used in the IL than in the RL. This explains why rice production cost was higher in the IL ($270 ha -1 ) than in the RL ($217 ha -1 ). However, due to the higher yields from the IL, the unit cost of paddy production in the IL ($0.27 kg -1 ) is lower than that in the RL ($0.33 kg -1 ).Across the eight countries in IL, the average rice area per household ranged from 0.27 ha (Ankazomiriotra, in Madagascar) to 3.90 ha (Kouroumari, in Mali). The lowest percentage of farmers using certified seeds was found in Madagascar (1%), followed by Mali (9%), and the highest percentages were in Cote d'Ivoire (76 %) and Ghana (73 %). The average labor use was highest in Madagascar (140 labor days ha − 1 ) and the lowest in Mali (37 labor days ha − 1 ). Rice production cost was the highest in Niger ($417 ha − 1 ) and Senegal ($382 ha − 1 ) and the lowest in Madagascar ($108 ha − 1 ). Farmers in Niger applied the highest amounts of N fertilizer (80− 105 kg N ha -1 ), and those in Ghana and Nigeria applied the least (<20 kg N ha -1 ) (Table 1). The low use of fertilizers in rice production in the eight countries using the IL system was also confirmed by the high percentage of farmers who did not apply N and P fertilizers or applied marginal quantities (< 2 kg N ha -1 and 1 kg P ha -1 ). Overall, 95 % of farmers in Nigeria (the highest percentage), 58 % in Senegal, 30 % in Mali, 24 % in Togo, 23 % in Cote d'Ivoire, and 10 % in Niger (the lowest percentage) did not apply at least one of the fertilizers (Table 1).In RL, the average rice area per household ranged from 0.38 ha (Ambohibary, in Madagascar) and 0.61 ha (Region des Plateaux, in Togo) to 3.68 ha (Nassarawa, in Nigeria) and 8.50 ha (Kahama, in Tanzania) (Table 2). The lowest percentage of farmers using certified seeds was found in Tanzania (2%) and the highest were in Cote d'Ivoire (59 %) and Benin (57 %). The mean labor quantity used in rice production in RL ranged from the highest in Benin (134 labor day ha − 1 ) to the lowest in Sierra Leone (30 labor day ha − 1 ). Rice production was the most expensive in Cameroon ($386 ha − 1 ) and Togo ($344 ha − 1 ). Farmers in Togo and Benin applied the highest quantity of N fertilizer (80− 105 kg N ha -1 ), and those in Tanzania, Nigeria and Cote d'IvoireSample mean, attainable (top decile) mean and gaps in grain yield, net profit and labor productivity in irrigated lowland production systems and irrigated versus rainfed lowland production systems in SSA countries.The same letter indicates no significant difference at the 5% level. applied the least (<20 kg N ha -1 ) (Table 2). In the 10 countries with RL, a large percentage of farmers did not apply N and P fertilizers or applied only marginal quantities (< 2 kg N ha -1 and 1 kg P ha -1 ). Overall, 99 % of farmers in Tanzania and 96 % in Sierra Leone did not apply N fertilizer and 87 % in Ghana did not apply P fertilizer (Table 2).The mean rice yield in the IL (4.1 t ha − 1 ) was almost triple that obtained in the RL (1.4 t ha − 1 ) (Table 3). However, exploitable yield gaps between the highest-yielding 10 % of farmers (the top decile) and the mean-yielding farmers (the mean of all farms) were observed in both production systems. The yield gaps were 40 % and 58 % (2.7 t ha − 1 and 2.0 t ha − 1 ) in the IL and the RL, respectively.For the IL, the highest rice yield was obtained in Dagana in Senegal (5.5 t ha − 1 ), followed by Tillaberi in Niger (5.1 t ha − 1 ) and Gagnoa in Cote d'Ivoire (5.0 t ha − 1 ), and the lowest yield (2.5 t ha − 1 ) was obtained in Kouroumari in Mali, Region Maritimes in Togo and Ankazomiriotra in Madagascar (Fig. 2; Table 2). The exploitable yield gap for the eight countries using the IL ranged between 29-52 % (1.7 to 3.8 t ha − 1 ) (Table 3). The highest yield gap in rice was determined for Togo (52 %), followed by Nigeria (46 %), and the lowest were observed in Senegal (29 %) and Ghana (35 %). The highest variability in grain yield was observed in Niger, followed by Senegal, and the lowest variability was observed in Madagascar and Mali (Fig. 2). By AEZ, farmers in the arid zone had the highest yield (5.5 t ha − 1 ), and the lowest yield was 1 and 2. calculated for the highland zone (2.5 t ha − 1 ) (Table 5).For the RL, the mean rice yield was the highest in Cameroon (2.3 t ha − 1 ), and the lowest was (<1 t ha − 1 ) in Tanzania, Sierra Leone and Ghana (Fig. 2; Table 4). The exploitable yield gap ranged between 40-69 % (0.9 to 4.9 t ha − 1 ) (Table 4). The highest yield gap was calculated for Cameroon (69 %), followed by Tanzania (66 %), and the lowest were for Mali (40 %) and Cote d'Ivoire (50 %). The highest variability in grain yield was observed in Cameroon and the lowest variability was observed in Ghana and Mali (Fig. 2). The highest yield (1.9 t ha − 1 ) was calculated in the highland zone, and the lowest was calculated in the subhumid zone (1.1 t ha − 1 ) (Table 5).Like yield, the mean net profit from the RL ($223 ha − 1 ) was significantly lower than that from the IL ($1036 ha − 1 ) (Table 3). The profit gaps (derived from the three yield categories) were 39 % in the IL and 72 % in the RL. The values of the exploitable gaps (approximatelySample mean, attainable (top decile) mean and gaps in grain yield, net profit and labor productivity in rainfed lowland production systems in SSA countries.The same letter indicates no significant difference at the 5% level.Five performance indicators of rice production sustainability across five climatic zones and two production systems. $600 ha − 1 ) were similar in the two production systems. In the RL, 10 % of farmers in the lowest decile had an average negative net profit ($-130 ha − 1 ), while this value was $189 ha − 1 for farmers under IL conditions.For the IL, the highest net profit was obtained in Nigeria ($2301 ha − 1 ) and the lowest were obtained in Mali ($440 ha − 1 ) and Madagascar ($336 ha − 1 ) (Fig. 3; Table 3). The exploitable profit gap ranged between 10-54 % ($128 to 1114 ha − 1 ) (Table 3). The highest profit gap was calculated for Togo (54 %), followed by Mali (53 %), and the lowest were calculated for Ghana (10 %) and Nigeria (29 %). The greatest variability in grain profit was observed in Nigeria, followed by Niger, and the lowest variability was observed in Madagascar and Mali (Fig. 3). The highest profits were achieved by farmers in the humid zone ($1293 ha − 1 ), and the lowest were achieved in the highland zone ($336 ha − 1 ) (Table 5).For the RL, the highest profits were achieved in Cameroon ($662 ha − 1 ) and Togo ($365 ha − 1 ), and the lowest profits were achieved in Tanzania ($38 ha − 1 ), Ghana ($91 ha − 1 ) and Mali ($106 ha − 1 ) (Fig. 3; Table 4). Large exploited profit gaps were calculated, and they ranged between 52-89 % ($291 ha − 1 to $1334 ha − 1 ). The highest profit gap in the RL was calculated for Tanzania, and the lowest was calculated for Cote d'Ivoire (Table 4). The greatest variability in profit was observed in Cameroon and Sierra Leone, and the lowest was observed in Madagascar and Mali (Fig. 3). The highest profits ($337 ha − 1 ) were obtained in the humid zone, and the lowest profits were obtained in the semiarid zone ($106 ha − 1 ) (Table 5).Among the surveyed countries, the average labor productivity was 90 kg grain labor day − 1 in the IL and only 25 kg grain labor day − 1 in the RL (Table 3). The low labor productivity in the RL was due to the low grain yields. However, an exploitable gap existed for both production systems. The labor productivity gaps were 38 % and 59 % in the IL and RL, respectively. The exploitable gap in value was higher in the IL system (54 kg grain labor day − 1 ) than in the RL (36 kg grain labor day − 1 ).Under IL conditions, the highest labor productivity was observed in Senegal (192 kg grain labor day − 1 ), followed by Nigeria (126 kg grain labor day − 1 ) and Ghana (118 kg grain labor day − 1 ), and the lowest labor productivity was observed in Madagascar (22 kg grain labor day − 1 ) Fig. 3. Box-whisker plots of net profits in rainfed lowland (RL) and irrigated lowland (IL) production systems: the mean farmer population (0), the bottom 10 % (1), middle 80 % (2), and top 10 % (3) of farmers in 12 countries in SSA.(Fig. 4; Table 3). The exploitable labor productivity gap for the eight countries within IL reached 56 %. The highest labor productivity gap was calculated for Togo (56 %) and Ghana (55 %). The labor productivity gap in Senegal was negative, implying that the farmers producing higher yields had lower labor productivity value than the mean value for the population. The greatest variability in labor productivity was observed in Niger and Senegal, and the lowest variability was observed in Cote d'Ivoire (Fig. 4). Because farmers producing in IL in Senegal had the highest labor productivity, the highest labor productivity (192 kg grain labor day − 1 ) was observed in the arid zone; the lowest was observed in the highland zone (22 kg grain labor day − 1 ) (Table 5).For the RL, labor productivity was low in general, ranging from the lowest obtained by farmers in Cote d'Ivoire (14 kg grain labor day − 1 ) and Benin (15 kg grain labor day − 1 ) to the highest achieved in Mali (53 kg grain labor day − 1 ) and Nigeria (34 kg grain labor day − 1 ) (Fig. 4; Table 4). Large, exploitable labor productivity gaps existed in the 10 countries with RL, and their values ranged between 47 % (Ghana) and 71 % (Madagascar) (Table 4). The greatest variability in labor productivity was observed in Madagascar and Nigeria, and the lowest variability was observed in Benin and Cameroon (Fig. 4). Among the different AEZ, the highest labor productivity (53 kg grain labor day − 1 ) was observed in the semiarid zone, and the lowest (16 kg grain labor day − 1 ) was observed in the humid zone (Table 5).The NUE was 146 kg grain kg − 1 N in IL and 63 kg grain kg − 1 N in RL (Table 3). The PUE was 754 kg grain kg − 1 P in IL and 393 kg grain kg − P in RL. In addition, high NUE and PUE gaps were observed under RL conditions. The NUE gap was only 9% in IL but was as high as 53 % in RL. Approximately 43 % and 20 % of farmers are mining soil N nutrient in the IL and RL production systems, respectively, due to the high values of NUE (>100 kg grain kg − 1 N) (Table 6). The PUE gap was 46 % in RL (Table 3). The lowest PUE gap calculated in the IL was negative, meaning that the farmers had too high PUE values, which can explain that most farmers are mining soil P nutrient. Approximately 34 % and % of farmers are mining soil P nutrient in RL and IL, respectively, according to their high values of PUE (>400 kg grain kg − 1 P) (Table 6).Among the five countries for which the NUE under IL conditions was calculated, Mali had the highest NUE (239 kg grain kg − 1 N), and Niger had the lowest (106 kg grain kg − 1 N) (Fig. 5; Table 3). The exploitable NUE gap reached 41 % in Niger and Cote d'Ivoire. The lowest NUE gap was negative, implying that the farmers in the top 10 % by yield had below-average NUE and majority of farmers apply too low amount of those nutrients from inorganic fertilizers. Indeed, most farmers are mining soil nutrients. Only 44 % of farmers were within an acceptable NUE range (30-100); 42 % had high values of NUE, indicating soil nutrients mining conditions, and the remaining farmers (14 %) had low NUE, indicating wasteful nutrient management practices (Table 6). The highest percentages of farmers with high NUE values (mining soil nutrients) were observed in Mali (66 %) and Cote d'Ivoire (56 %). The greatest variability in NUE was in observed in Mali and Niger, and the lowest variability was observed in Cote d'Ivoire (Fig. 5). Among the different AEZ, no zone had the average in the optimal NUE range (30-100) and the highest NUE (143 kg grain kg − 1 N) was found in the humid zone (Table 5). The average PUE was above the optimal PUE range in the five countries with the highest PUE (mining soil nutrients) was in Senegal (968 kg grain kg − 1 P), and the lowest was in Niger (564 kg grain kg − 1 P) (Fig. 5; Table 3).For the rainfed lowland production system, the highest NUE and PUE were achieved in Cote d'Ivoire (111 kg grain kg − 1 N and 636 kg grain kg − 1 P, respectively) (Fig. 5; Table 4), indicating both N and P mining are happening in Cote d'Ivoire as these values are above the upper limits. Similarly, the lowest NUE and PUE were observed in Togo (26 kg grain kg − 1 N and 202 kg grain kg − 1 P, respectively), indicating overapplication by farmers (71 % for NUE and 41 % for PUE). The farmers in the top 10 % by yield in Benin and Togo are in the optimal range of both NUE and PUE. Approximately 44 % had low values of NUE (waste of N fertilizers) with the highest percentage in Benin and Togo (Table 6).The analyses highlighted the trade-offs among the five PIs and production inputs based on the three farmer categories (Fig. 6). In the IL production system, clear differences in the PIs and production inputs among the three yield categories were observed in Cote d'Ivoire, Mali, Togo, Nigeria, Niger and Senegal. In addition to producing higher yields, the top 10 % yielding farmers had higher profits and labor productivity than the farmers in the two other yield categories (bottom 10 % and middle 80 %) in the following six countries: Cote d'Ivoire, Mali, Togo, Nigeria, Niger and Senegal. The correlation analysis also confirmed that in both irrigated and rainfed production systems, there were strong positive correlations between yield, net profit and labor productivity (Tables 7 and 8; Figs. 7 and 8). The quantities of N and P fertilizers were also positively correlated with three PIs (yield, profit and labor productivity) in IL and RL production systems (Tables 7 and 8). However, there was no significant correlation between the two efficiencies (NUE and PUE) and two PIs (yield and labor productivity). In IL, the quantity of labor use was negatively correlated with the use of equipment and herbicide while the labor productivity was positively correlated with the use of equipment and herbicide (Table 7). The top 10 % of farmers in Cote d'Ivoire, Mali, Togo and Niger used higher quantities of N and P fertilizers than the other farmer categories, but this was not the case in Nigeria and Senegal. The top 10 % of farmers in Cote d'Ivoire, Togo and Niger also used more labor than the rest of the farmers, while the top % in Cote d'Ivoire and Togo used higher quantities of seeds than the rest of the farmers.In RL, the top 10 % of farmers in terms of yield also had higher profits and labor productivity than farmers in the other yield categories (bottom 10 % and middle 80 %) in all ten countries (Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Madagascar, Mali, Nigeria, Togo, Benin, Cameroon, Sierra Leone, and Tanzania). The top 10 % of farmers in Benin, Madagascar and Togo used higher quantities of N and P fertilizers than the rest of the farmers. They also used a higher quantity of labor in Cameroon but less labor in Madagascar. This implies that low-performing farmers in Madagascar should use more N and P fertilizers and could reduce labor inputs; those in Togo and Benin should use more N and P fertilizers; and those in Cameroon should increase labor inputs.Estimating economic and environmental performance indicators of rice production is a first step for identifying intervention areas across countries, production systems and AEZ to improve productivity and profitability, reduce drudgery, increase sustainability of rice production (Devkota et al., 2019). The assessment of rice production systems in For NUE, Too low (wasteful application, <30); Desirable range (30-100); Too high (soil mining, >100).For PUE, Too low (wasteful application, <100); Desirable range (100-400); Too high (soil mining, >400).SSA countries showed a large variation in rice yield across countries and between production systems. The mean yield varied widely between 2.5 to 5.6 t ha − 1 and 0.6 to 2.3 t ha − 1 in IL and RL, respectively. In addition, rice yields are critically low, especially in RL, where farmers produced, on average, 1.4 t ha − 1 . Although the average yield (4.1 t ha − 1 ) is higher in IL, farmers produced, on average, only 2.5 t ha − 1 in IL in Madagascar, Mali and Togo. Result of lower yield of RL than IL confirm previous studies (Niang et al., 2017;Tanaka et al., 2017;Senthilkumar et al., 2020). While comparing the rice yield in SSA countries with the intensively managed lowland rice yield in six East Asia countries (Devkota et al., 2019), yields in both IL and RL are lower than that of many sites in Asia except for Bago site in Myanmar. In SSA countries, lower yields were associated with no or lower N and P fertilizer applications in this study. This finding is supported by studies on nutrition omission trials or fertilizer response trials in SSA (Saito et al., 2019;Tsujimoto et al., 2019;Niang et al., 2017). Saito et al. (2019) showed positive response of rice yield to N and P fertilizer, and rice yields without N, P, and K were only 68, 84, and 89 % of yields of the NPK treatment. Nevertheless, a high proportion of farmers do not apply N and P fertilizers or apply only very low quantities. On average, 61 % of farmers in RL and 44 % in IL do not apply N or apply <2 kg N ha − 1 in rice, while up to 74 % of farmers in RL and 55 % in IL do not apply P or apply <1 kg P ha − 1 in rice. The cause of low level of fertilizer application is not known in this study, but may be related to combination of the following. First, low level of fertilizer application may be due to high prices coupled with farmers' financial constraints. When farmers need to buy fertilizers at the beginning of rice growing season, they might have financial liquidity constraints and limited access to financial services or credits. In many SSA countries, governments do not provide financial assistance to farmers and where it is available, it is mainly for cash crops such as coffee, cocoa, cotton, etc. The financial constraint assumption was also raised by Wortmann et al. (2019) in their book chapter that analyzed smallholder farmers' fertilizer use issues in Africa. Secondly, farmers access and timely availability of fertilizers are usually an issue. Even in countries where subsidies exist, due to poor infrastructure and supply chains, fertilizer inputs may not be available on time. Thirdly, especially for rainfed lowlands, farmers experience high levels of uncertainty about biophysical factors (erratic rainfall, insufficient water in the field, etc.), which are increasing with the negative effect of climate change, leading to the low use of inputs (e. g. fertilizer) (Niang et al., 2018;Arouna et al., 2021b). As soil texture is largely variable at short distance in rainfed lowlands, there is a need for field-specific recommendations that consider soil texture and the spatial-temporal dynamics of water availability to reduce risk and uncertainty about biophysical factors and increase the use of fertilizers (Niang et al., 2018). For drought-prone conditions, water conservation measures, such as bunding, mulching, land-leveling, and no-tillage should also be considered for enhancing soil moisture and improving yield response to fertilizer. In addition, if reliable weather forecasting becomes available, it will help farmers to take timely decision to reduce the risk and uncertainty related to climatic factors. Although the average amount of fertilizer used as determined in this study is lower than the crop required (considering efficiencies), high variability was observed among farmers and production systems. This explains the large yield gaps among different countries and production systems. Relative yield gap of 29-69% and absolute gap of 2.7 t ha − 1 in IL and 2.0 t ha − 1 in RL in this study are similar to those from recent field surveys in SSA (Tanaka et al., 2017;Dossou-Yovo et al., 2020) but higher than in Asian countries where the yield gap ranged from 24 to 42 % (Devkota et al., 2019). These demonstrate the high heterogeneity among farmers and suggest that, with moderate changes in the production practices (integrated good agronomic practices), farmers can improve their yields (by following the practices of their peers) in similar socioeconomic and biophysical conditions. There was a profit gap of 10-89%, and labor productivity gap up to 71 % between the 10 % highest-yielding and the mean-yielding farms. These gaps are generally higher than those computed for IL in six East Asian countries (Devkota et al., 2019). IL had significantly higher performance especially for yield, profit and labor productivity than RL. However, the average cultivated area per farmer under IL is lower than that under RL. This finding indicates the need to increase the cultivated area per household in IL and access to irrigation water in RL to increase rice production in SSA countries. To improve PIs of RL rice production, low-cost land and water management practices, such as the \"smart-valley approach\" (a participatory water and land management in inland valley landscapes with field leveling and bundling), could be introduced to improve the accessibility to water in lowland and reduce risk for crop failure, leading to more use of fertilizers (Arouna and Akpa, 2019;Rodenburg et al., 2014).Yield, profit, and labor productivity were positively correlated in both IL and RL. However, correlation coefficients are slightly different between IL and RL. Relationships between labor productivity and the other two indicators were weaker than relationships between yield and profit in both IL and RL. Farmers with high labor productivity may not always be high-yielding farmers. This suggests that it is important to evaluate key performance indicators and evaluate potential trade-off among them for identifying intervention areas for sustainable rice cultivation. It is noted that there were high labor use and large variations in production cost among farmers in this study. Causes behind the high labor use and lower labor productivity can be explained by low adoption of labor-saving technologies such as equipment (for instance mechanical weeders) and herbicide. This confirms the findings of Rodenburg et al. (2019). Indeed, labor use and labor productivity are significantly correlated with the use of equipment and herbicide in the IL. Although we do not have data on a list of all machineries used by farmers, it is known that, in countries such as Senegal, Niger and Nigeria, production activities in IL are mechanized. In this study, these countries have low labor inputs and higher labor productivity (more than 100 kg grain labor day − 1 ). Recent studies in Asian countries showed that farmers were more labor efficient due to a high level of adoption of labor-saving technologies (Bordey et al., 2016;Devkota et al., 2019). In addition, there is an increasing labor scarcity in rural areas in SSA due to urban migration. These indicate that there is a scope for reducing labor use and increasing labor productivity through adoption of labor-saving technologies.Among those applying fertilizer, only 34-44% of farmers belonged to desirable ranges in NUE and PUE, and a significant number of farmers was in the lower or higher thresholds of NUE and PUE. The higher values indicate mining soil nutrients is occurring (Devkota et al., 2019;EU Nitrogen Expert Panel, 2015), whereas lower values indicate that fertilizers are not effective due to some reasons, including poor crop, nutrient, water, and weed managements. The high values of NUE in the 12 study countries are like what was observed in Myanmar, where approximately 92 % of farmers surveyed were engaged in mining soil nutrients (Devkota et al., 2019). For countries having low NUE and PUE with higher N and P application rates, reasons for lower values could be attributed to poor crop, nutrient, water, and weed managements by farmers, which thus calls for dissemination of nutrient management practices together with integrated crop management practices (Saito et al., 2015;Tanaka et al., 2015;Arouna et al., 2021b).The trade-off analysis reveals country-and production systemintervention areas for improving sustainability performance indicators. For example, larges difference in yield and N and P fertilizer application rates between the 10 % highest-yielding farms and the mean-yielding farms in IL indicate that higher quantities of N and P fertilizers, labor and seeds may help to close yield gaps in Cote d'Ivoire. To improve yields, low performing farmers in yield should increase N and P fertilizers in IL in Niger. In RL, low-performing farmers in Madagascar should increase the quantities of N and P fertilizers applied and decrease labor use, while those in Cameroon should employ more labor. The difference between Cameroon and Madagascar is related to availability and associated cost of labor. In Madagascar, because of labor abundance especially the family labor, low-performing farmers are using too labor, which is reducing the efficiency. In contrast, because of high labor cost, low-performing farmers in Cameroon were using less labor than the top 10 % yielding farmers. In addition, the difference between Madagascar and Cameroon is also due to the actual level of labor input in each country. Indeed, the average labor input is higher in Madagascar (132 labor day ha − 1 ) than in Cameroon (122 labor day ha − 1 ). It is worth mentioning that although the above discussion focuses on increasing the quantities of N and P fertilizers as short-term solutions, alternative sources to N and P fertilizers such as locally available organic inputs or crop rotation systems with legumes can be also considered for long-term sustainability of rice-based systems.Although the analysis in this paper gave an in-depth view of the sustainability of the rice production system in SSA, there are some limitations in this study. First, the data used for analysis was for one growing season in 2013-2014. In the future study, data from several years are needed to analyze the temporal changes in the PIs in rice production in SSA. Second, data collection using interview especially for key parameters such as field size and yield, as it is done in this study, may reduce the precision of the estimation of the PIs. If resources permit, measuring tape or map calculation for field size and crop-cut for yield should be preferred (Saito et al., 2021). Lastly, future research could also increase the sample size per site to improve the robustness of the parameter estimates for the top 10 % of farmers.Grain yields of the smallholder farmers in irrigated and rainfed lowlands were low in the 12 surveyed countries. The low yields are explained by low levels of nutrient input use. In addition, low nutrient input use resulted in extremely higher NUE and PUE, indicating mining soil nutrients. Dissemination and adoption of integrated crop management practices including nutrient management practices may help improving rice productivity, profit, and nutrient use efficiency. The existence of large yield gaps between the top decile of farmers and the farmer population mean shows that context-based innovations can be developed by following the management practices of high-yielding farmers to improve input management and the sustainability of rice production. Such an approach will lead to innovations that are more adapted to farmers' socioeconomic and biophysical conditions. The irrigation production system performed better than the rainfed lowland production system. This confirms the importance of water management, especially low-cost approaches such as 'smart valleys approach', for reducing risk for drought and flooding, and increasing rice production in SSA. Large profit gaps were also noted in rice production and were due mainly to input costs, especially labor costs. Labor productivity was generally low in rice production in SSA, and it can be improved through introduction of labor-saving technologies."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3768867700.json b/main/part_2/3768867700.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af18e7fb47ac5dfdcf8415ba104c5eca151f28b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3768867700.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"8ccb91ac-7322-4c49-b961-c1f75c4820d4","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3774612973.json b/main/part_2/3774612973.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b36258b02af7a26c41c4e1457df84efcaf238c7f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3774612973.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8ea2d30db8e42cada03df550bd8aa230","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/441577d7-06dd-4273-9406-a4ddc78aa289/retrieve","id":"2111024691"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e8cce790-5205-4174-971a-f3425eb8633b","content":"The extensive small ruminant production system is characterized by disease outbreaks, shortage of feed and limited availability of water. Secondly, the crop and livestock systems are not effectively integrated to promote efficient use of nutrients. The study therefore aimed at improving crop-livestock intensification and integration through the introduction of improved feeding and health interventions into small ruminant production systems in Africa RISING project communities in northern Ghana.The experiment ran from November 2013 to October 2014 in 6 Africa RISING intervention communities in northern Ghana. Ten farmers were selected per community with five on treatment (feed and health treatment) and five control (farmer's practice). A daily amount of 200g of concentrate feed, which cost 31 US cents/kg, was given to treatment animals. The health treatment consisted of antibiotic injection, treatment against endo-and ecto-parasites, multivitamin injection every quarter plus one time Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) vaccination. Cost-benefit analysis was undertaken.Growth rate of treatment animals was higher than that of control animals (P<0.05) (Table 1). Lambs grew about twice as fast as kids (P<0.05) (Figs. 1a & 1b). Lower mortality rate was observed in treatment animals compared to control (P<0.05) partly contributing to higher birth rate observed in treatment animals (P<0.0001) (Table 1). A net gain of US$5.65 was observed for each treatment animal compared to US$8.58/control animal (P<0.05) however there was interaction between net gain and farmer's management practice (P<0.05). The treatment resulted in significant reduction in mortality and increased growth and birth rates. The concentrate feed in particular could be used selectively for pregnant and lactating females as well as for fattening males under the intensive system.The study confirms the positive effects of feed and health interventions on improved animal productivity and flock growth, and the potential for better integration of crop and livestock production systems. However, the net returns from such interventions should be considered in view of the relatively high cost of concentrate feed and the use of locally available feed resources to replace concentrate feed is recommended to ensure profitability and sustainability."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3785900382.json b/main/part_2/3785900382.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9118dcf1cc8306ad64c90a7a55aa90d422650ab1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3785900382.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a24ebc59b4e90d68722231306d2992e8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/afb0d1d3-29c7-42d9-944a-b1cfa55a395e/retrieve","id":"-374991336"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b68ef6b6-7223-4892-9128-fa4cb2ef19e8","content":"The new CGIAR GENDER Platform will contribute to the One CGIAR mission of ending hunger through science-driven transformation of food, land and water systems in the context of climate change, by reimagining the CGIAR gender-research-for-development agenda. We envision a new era in which food systems transformation and gender equality reinforce one another, accelerating and amplifying benefits that are equitable, sustainable and lasting. This report outlines the broad scope for developing an evidence hub that will be integrated with the Platform resource centre and highlights best practices and examples in establishing a user-friendly knowledge hub.The CGIAR Gender Platform Evidence Hub which will be housed in the Platform Resource Center is envisioned to be a mechanism to consolidate the collective knowledge on credible, legitimate and relevant evidence in the realm of gender and food systems. It provides a basis for debating and building evidence-based knowledge and practice in the Platform's focus areas. The evidence hub will act as a central repository for collective intelligence or arguments in gender in agriculture and food systems. Some proposed hub titles are included below -1. Gender in Agricultural Systems: an Evidence Repository (GASER) 2. Agriculture Systems and Gender: Insightful Long-term Evidence (AGILE)Based on the Evidence Gap Mapping exercise and identified key themes and sub themes of interest, the evidence hub will be organized into sections and subsections that are easily navigable and readily accessible. Along with the insights and resources categorised as mentioned, the hub will also host the EGM visual map as well as a forum for online stakeholder discussions.The hub will be a go-to repository for incremental evidence in the space of Gender and Food Systems. The hub will house different types of resources such as publications (journals, reports, policy briefs etc.), datasets, and multimedia, both internal to the CGIAR community and from the larger ecosystem.The intent of the evidence hub is to enable the audience and the research/academic community to -• Explore and debate the key challenges for the Gender in Agriculture movement. The community can link these challenges to issues, claims, organisations and solutions they are concerned with. • Members of the community can add a description of their work including geographical location and other relevant details. • Current questions can be posted, explored and discussed and new solutions proposed to tackle the major challenges. • Relevant evidence and resources for the community can be shared to contribute to the evidence base.The following graphic illustrates the key elements of a knowledge management framework for the GENDER platform, to position GENDER as the go-to-place for high quality evidence and knowledge on equitable and sustainable food systems.The evidence hub will aim to pool resources generated by the Platform, CGIAR partners such as national agricultural research and extension systems, university partners, advanced research institutions, nongovernment organizations, multilateral institutions and governments with whom CGIAR collaborates, and other entities. It will also consolidate and showcase key issues, insights and evidence from major websites and aligned repositories that have published thought provoking material on the subject (such as IFPRI's e-library https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/129389/; Data 2xhttps://data2x.org/ etc.)The hub will map both the social (people, organisations etc.) and discourse (issues, hypothesis, evidence etc.) ecosystem. Resources will be crowdsourced from the social ecosystem to triangulate information that is identified and filtered from the discourse ecosystem.Based on a review of literature around effective knowledge management and dissemination practices, and a review of evidence platforms across sectors and domains, the following practices and strategies are recommended for establishing an evidence hub for the CGIAR GENDER platform:A thorough mapping of different stakeholder groups and audiences and profiling their user journeys is essential to ensure that they are able to access required information and meet their goals in the least number of clicks possible. Consulting users from the outset can build buy-in, improve evidence uptake and engagement with the hub.The below image provides a snapshot of the user pathway through the hub from landing on the portal to visiting key touchpoints.Source: https://www.optimizely.com/optimization-glossary/user-journey-map/The journey mapping should include identification of personas of target customers and mapping their potential experience on the site. Thereafter a narrative or a story can be developed based on the derived user personas and touchpoints and this story can be visualised through user friendly layouts.Before commencing the hub design, a sample end user group (through internal networks) could be approached with a structured questionnaire to understand the various user paths and characteristics.The information should be organized using relevant taxonomy, keywords and themes/groups that are commonly used by the stakeholders in the sector as well as determined from the EGM exercise. Search engine optimization can be achieved through the right combination of keywords. Resources can also be grouped and presented for different users e.g. resources for researchers, resources for policymakers, and so on.• Organise content based on different goals of seeking information as indicated in the graphic below:Website navigation is an important element of designing a user-friendly evidence portal. Mapping user flows is a key step that will inform the design of the interface. At this stage, it is important to consider the following points:• What information are different user groups likely to search for?• What are the different entry points to the evidence portal? E.g. through Google search, email campaigns, social media • What actions are they likely to take once they have discovered the information they are looking for? E.g. download publication/data, share publication etc. Following is a simplified example of a potential user flow for an evidence hub:• The user arrives at the homepage → From the homepage the user clicks on the Resources tab → From the Resources tab the user uses the search menu to look for outputs related to a specific research theme → From the search results generated, the user downloads the first output Some best practises in terms of ease of navigation include -1. Type of menu -based on the number of links to be housed under the hub, we could use the mega menu style (for more links) or the cascading menu style (for fewer links). This will depend on the key user profiles 2. Add an interactive site map -the site map can be in the form of a video tutorial that would explain how to navigate the hub to the end user 3. Use of labels and icons -intuitive labels and icons can be used with menu links to communicate the information 4. Search versus navigation -use both in tandem to address the different user groups and individual preferences 5. Ready display of information -use simple classification categories to reduce search time Based on the user flow mapping exercise, the navigation should be intuitive and query forms should provide relevant filters for enabling users to generate reports and search for outputs accordingly. Relevant fields can include themes and sub-themes related to the platform's strategic agenda, region, type of output, year. Advanced filters can be added over time, as the volume of outputs stored on the hub gradually increases.Example: dynamic knowledge map to visualise outputs and enable rapid discovery Open Knowledge Maps presents a topical overview for your search term based on the 100 most relevant documents for your search term. This feature can be added over time, to speed up discovery of relevant information by research area or theme. Interactive evidence gap maps provide users a birds-eye view of the evidence base on a specific theme, identify areas with little to no evidence, and can facilitate collaboration across the CGIAR and development ecosystem. As a starting point, we will integrate the EGM visual in the evidence hub and at a later stage this can be expanded into a more comprehensive open knowledge map.Integrating principles of visual hierarchy is essential to deliver a user-friendly interface.• For text-heavy websites and sections, an F-shaped pattern can be used to draw the user's attention to the most important sections of the website. In this case, the F-shaped pattern can be used to display the search filters and results (example below-3ie Development Evidence portal). Example: IDEO's card style display• Finally, A/B testing can be carried out with a sample of users to understand which interface works better. Such pilots can be conducted with closed user groups from the immediate CGIAR family and ecosystem partners. Design thinking workshops can also be conducted to capture any design elements that might have been overlooked while conceptualising the architecture and layout of the evidence hub.Collating and making evidence available on the hub is only the first step in improving access to credible evidence. Research by the Alliance for Useful Evidence suggests that enabling uptake through targeted communication strategies, and engaging with users (The Science of Using Science, 2016) is crucial in enabling research uptake. Designing a package of communication strategies including email marketing campaigns, and innovative social media strategies can generate higher traffic. Moreover, hosting a dedicated blog on the platform can be an effective channel for presenting non-technical summaries and actionable takeaways of publications and outputs.User engagement can be boosted by collecting feedback from a sample on a periodic basis and analysing user journeys to identify any shortcomings in design. For instance, CGIAR and IFPRI use Altmetric to show how many have accessed a specific article, and how many have cited or mentioned it on social media platforms. Having a dedicated forum for chats with experts and practitioners can result in higher traffic to the hub and improve engagement with knowledge products and offerings. Further, creating a network of evidence champions and a vibrant community of practitioners that serve as ambassadors for the platform's work can enable wider reach as well. A lot of evidence centres also encourage cross platform tracking of mentions of the evidence hub (in twitter and other social media platforms) which can be adopted during platform design. These efforts can be aligned with existing initiatives such as CGIAR Dgroup to minimise duplication of efforts, ensure optimal use of resources and aim for greater integration across the ecosystem in line with the objectives set for 'One CGIAR'.Digital storytelling techniques and innovative formats such as video abstracts, explainers, interactive graphics and infographics can help translate key messages into digestible formats for different audiences. This approach has the potential to elucidate complex concepts and research in a compelling and accessible manner while retaining the nuances of various forms of research and the voices of beneficiaries and other stakeholder groups.Example: CGAP's infographic on segmenting smallholder households and interactive data hubThe evidence hub should allow different users to build progressively and collaboratively on the same content, thus facilitating collaborative knowledge production and discovery. The system should allow users to easily add evidence or present counter-evidence to other claims, thus triggering conversations and knowledge sharing between people who tackle similar issues. Finally, the evidence hub should allow users to visualize, explore and be part of a social network of contributors. This would ensure sustainability of the hub beyond just sharing or showcasing resources in the areas of gender and agriculture.It is important to conduct a baseline assessment of the current traffic to the GENDER platform and establish key metrics that will be tracked to assess the evidence hub's reach. This is important for understanding trends in user behaviour and enhancing the hub's reach over time. A number of factors influence website traffic including navigation, design, on-page and off-page Search Engine Optimisation, use of relevant keywords, loading speed, linkages with social media channels and campaigns, among others. Analysing traffic can inform strategies for course correction with respect to content, layout and design of sections, if required.Some of the relevant metrics that can be tracked in this regard are:• Audience data -number of visits, number of unique visitors and growth in these numbers • New vs returning visitor ratio • Number of views of specific pages/outputs, downloads and social shares of outputs • Length of time per visit • Campaign data -for instance, whether email marketing campaigns or social media campaigns are more effective in driving traffic to the hubA robust process flow is required to govern all activities related to uploading, updating and managing information on the hub using a content management system. This will ensure that the hub remains upto-date with relevant information and build its influence and credibility as a go-to platform for evidence on the subject.The process flows should also illustrate the linkages between the hub and CGIAR ecosystem, including protocols for depositing outputs and metadata in proper institutional or platform repositories, and editorial and style guidelines, in line with CGIAR and the GENDER platform's policies.2. Representative icons -Use of intuitive icons ensures that the user readily understands the message without having to spend time on the content or text. 3. Dashboard -A dynamic summary dashboard in a ticker form provides a quick overview of the extent of information accessible through the hub at any point in time. 4. Simple search bar -The search bar placed on the right for and within the dashboard provides a clean and simple tool to explore content for a new user who might not be looking for any specific information but in general wants to understand what is available in the hub. 5. The spotlight section showcases the most current and seminal knowledge output (publication, data etc.) that provides the user with a quick link to new research and insights without the need to search or go through all the resources.The sample themes page showcases the suggested content under the first tab in the header menu. The theme pages will typically have a short description of the themes and sub themes and provide an option to search for particular resources under the theme.The knowledge output page showcases the learning outputs under three categoriesa) CGIAR group resources: This category houses all resources produced by CGIAR and its group entities b) Global evidence: This category houses all resources in the area of gender in agriculture and food systems from relevant sources around the globe c) Evidence map: This tab showcases the evidence in a visual form such as a open knowledge map Under each category, along with a search function for users who intend to search with specific keywords, there is an option to search by topics, type and region. This elaborate search bar is intentionally placed in the sub page under knowledge products so that the user is able to filter using more than one option under each category (for e.g. resources such as publications and data, from India and China). For the more rigorous search filter, left alignment is ideal so that the outcomes of the search are prominently displayed on the right for ease of access.The discussion forum page organises user discussions according to the themes and conversations are neatly packaged under the relevant queries or topics initiated by the user. These discussions can be tagged and directly linked to the resources for content upload and download.The other two layouts suggested below provide a variation to the homepage content organisation according to the user eye movement, click efficiency and functionality.The suggestive layouts for the main pages of the evidence hub is intended to drive usage and enhance end user experience through simple and intuitive placements and a clean and efficient design. The final layout will, however, depend on the target audience, a/b testing, budget and technical capabilities, the desired content placement and other such important factors that might be a priority for the Platform organisers.The costing of the hub microsite development (based on rates in India) assuming 10-15 unique pages comes to around INR 6,00,000 (~USD 8500). Further details are provided in the table below - "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3787161955.json b/main/part_2/3787161955.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8684ac54ab290158d29f23e6186ce1dae5a7bbb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3787161955.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e95507ca53a0036959d723647f6f49f4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/870856b4-f363-49cd-97a0-44f5da7d175d/retrieve","id":"1614137224"},"keywords":["land use planning","trade-offs","multiple objectives","conservation","ecosystem services","biodiversity","agricultural development"],"sieverID":"4bdfd95a-e21b-4ab3-8b93-37e2b47ec435","content":"As humanity's demand for resources continues to rise and productive arable lands become increasingly scarce, many of Earth's remaining intact regions are at heightened risk of destruction from agricultural development. In situations where agricultural expansion is inevitable, it is important to manage intact landscape transformation so that impacts on environmental values are minimised. Here, we present a novel, spatially explicit, land use planning framework that addresses the decision making needed to account for different, competing economic-environment objectives (agricultural production value, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service retention) when land use change is inevitable within an intact landscape. We apply our framework to the globally significant savannahs of the Orinoquia (Colombia), which in a post-conflict era is under increased agricultural development pressure. We show that while negative environmental impacts can be reduced through planning, the total area of land converted to agriculture is the unavoidable principal driver of biodiversity and ecosystem service loss. We therefore identify planning solutions that perform well across all objectives simultaneously, despite trade-offs among them. When 15%, 20%, 30% and 40% of the study area is allowed to be converted to agriculture, on average planning can improve species persistence and ecosystem service retention by up to 16%, 15%, 12%, and 9%, respectively, when compared to agricultural-focused solutions. Development in the region so far has had an unnecessarily large impact on environmental objectives due to a lack of effective land use planning, creating an 'opportunity debt'. Our study provides an evidence base to inform proactive planning and the development of environmentally sensible agricultural development policy and practice in the region. This framework can be used by stakeholders to achieve agriculture expansion goals and maximise economic profit while minimising impacts on the environment in the Orinoquia, or any relatively intact region that is being developed.With almost 40% of Earth's land surface transformed by farming activity (Clark and Tilman 2017), agriculture is the single largest contributor to biodiversity loss to date (Dudley and Alexander 2017) and considered as one of the main drivers of potential biodiversity loss in the near future (IPBES 2019). Global agricultural activity has also resulted in at least 133bn tonnes of sequestered soil carbon loss to the atmosphere (Sanderman et al 2017), and accounted for approximately 70% of the world's freshwater withdrawals for anthropogenic use (Rosegrant et al 2009). The continued expansion of agricultural activity is driving the pace of Earth's continually changing terrestrial human footprint (Venter et al 2016), and is a fundamental reason for growing calls to conserve those last remaining ecologically intact landscapes, given their increasing importance for biodiversity and ecosystem service provision, and their disproportionately high ecological value in a time of climate change (Martin and Watson 2016, Scheffers et al 2016, Pimm et al 2018, Dinerstein et al 2019). Yet global demands for food, and the economic opportunities that agriculture presents to developing nations mean that many of Earth's remaining intact ecosystems are under significant threat from agricultural expansion (Vargas et al 2015, Morán-Ordóñez et al 2017, Potapov et al 2017, Roucoux et al 2017). This is further exacerbated by the fact that productive arable lands are becoming increasingly scarce, so farmers must continually encroach into intact places (Lambin andMeyfroidt 2011, Bijl et al 2017).When a landscape that is largely ecologically intact is being 'opened up' for development, strategic, proactive planning is needed to identify opportunities for enhanced outcomes for both environmental and agricultural goals (Forman and Collinge 1997). Systematic planning can help guide complex land-use decisions by fostering stakeholder engagement, improving the efficiency of land use allocation, describing the tradeoffs between biodiversity and economic objectives thereby identifying compromise solutions and, identifying management opportunities and strategies that can improve biodiversity outcomes in production landscapes (Polasky et al 2008, Runting et al 2015, Adams et al 2016, Estes et al 2016, Runting et al 2019, Strassburg et al 2019). However, to date, these efforts typically have been conducted in transformed (i.e. fragmented) landscapes, in contexts where the environmental goal is to maximise biodiversity and environmental service gain (via restoration or strategic protection). Here, building on this work, we develop a quantitative, multi-objective land use planning framework that allows for a spatially explicit assessment of likely impacts of land use change on environmental values including biodiversity conservation, carbon storage and water retention and one that, by adjusting the relative weights among objectives, is able to minimise the loss of these values while ensuring production value from development can be maintained.We apply our framework to the relatively intact Llanos (plains) of the Orinoco region of Colombia. The country has recently emerged from 50 years of civil conflict, largely with the militia group FARC (the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) who, in 2016, signed a peace treaty with the government of Colombia (Gobierno Nacional de Colombia 2016, Salazar et al 2018). This treaty has opened economic opportunities, with undeveloped or intact lands that were previously off-limits such as the Orinoquia now being targeted for agricultural expansion (DNP 2018). The tropical climate and grass-covered expanses of mostly flat land, make it an ideal location for agricultural expansion, and it is increasingly the focus of livestock, forestry, soy, rice and palm oil industries (López-Ricaurte et al 2017).We assess the impacts of the conversion of native vegetation to agriculture on biodiversity (species persistence and ecosystem representation) and ecosystem services (water provision and carbon sequestration), describe the trade-offs between environmental and agricultural objectives, the trade-offs among environmental objectives, and assess the effectiveness of the current distribution of land uses. In doing so, we provide an evidence base to inform proactive planning for environmentally sensible agricultural development policy and practice in the region. Our planning framework is flexible and can be translated to any intact region that is undergoing development, and where the goal is to maximise economic gains while simultaneously minimising loss of environmental values.The Orinoquia is located in the eastern part of Colombia, covering 255 123 km 2 or approximately 26% of the country (figure 1) and contains 36 ecosystem types that span dense forests, gallery forests, wetlands and the dominant tropical grassland savannahs (Llanos) (Lasso et al 2010, Etter et al 2017). The Llanos of the Orinoquia is one of the most important reservoirs of biodiversity in the Neotropics (Gassón 2002), but agricultural development is a key objective of the National Planning Department of the Colombian government (Gassón 2002, DNP 2018). Currently, 12% of the Orinoquia's natural landscape has been converted to agriculture and associated urbanisation. The most extensive land use is cattle grazing on natural savannah grasslands. However, agricultural activities such as oil palm cultivation have become lucrative industries in the region in part due to government incentives (Vargas et al 2015), and are foreseen to continue expanding (Castiblanco et al 2013). Five major forms of agriculture likely to influence the future of the region include livestock, palm oil, forestry, rice, and soy (DNP 2014).The objective of our formulation is to optimise the allocation (areal expansion) of livestock, oil palm, forestry, rice, and soy 'zones' within the region in order to maximise agricultural production value (USD yr −1 ) while minimising impacts on biodiversity, quantified in terms of species persistence and ecosystem representation (Watson andVenter 2017, Dinerstein et al 2019), and ecosystem services, quantified in terms of water loss (l yr −1 ) and carbon loss (t). As the study area is currently largely undeveloped, there is an implicit sixth zone, natural vegetation. Existing urban and mining land (234 km 2 ) and formally protected areas (83 586 km 2 ) within the study area are not permitted to be converted to agricultural land use. Agricultural gains are estimated as the potential production value for each commodity, adjusted in accordance with the estimated yield for each commodity and by transportation cost (Estes et al 2016, SM 1.2 is available online at stacks.iop.org/ERL/15/014001/ mmedia).We use a land cover map based on the Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies (IDEAM) land cover map (IDEAM 2010), updated with relevant agricultural land use classes from an ecosystem map containing finer detailed agricultural data (IDEAM, Instituto Humboldt, IGAC, INVEMAR, MADS 2015). These maps are the most up to date and comprehensive land use/land cover maps that currently exist for the region. We assign these to a set of 1 km 2 planning units (n=247 790) which we identify as natural ecosystems (n=129 765), pasture for livestock (n=30 935), oil palm (n=1913), forestry (n=269), rice (n=1087), soy (n=1), protected areas (n=83 586) or urban/mining areas (n=234) (SM 1.8).Species persistence benefit is based on mammal, bird and reptile species that were either (i) savannah habitat specialists, (ii) endemic to the Orinoquia, or (iii) had an International Union for Conservation of Nature categorisation of near threatened, vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered. We select these species groups to represent the faunal assemblages within savannah ecosystem types, that are unique to the Orinoquia and are already threatened (SM 2 table S2.1). We use range maps for these 145 species to determine which species benefited from conservation within each planning unit. Species benefit, summed across all species following Strassburg et al (2019), is quantified as local extinction risk, which is based on the ratio of the remaining and original habitat area for each species within the study area (sensu Thomas et al 2004, Strassburg et al 2019;SM 1.3).Beyond reducing local species extinction risk, we adopt a retention target of 50% of historic extent (defined as the potential extent of a given ecosystem if it was left uninfluenced by anthropogenic activity; SM table S3.2) for each natural ecosystem type of the region (Etter et al 2017) to ensure the persistence of a diverse range of natural habitats for species assemblages, ecological process and provisioning services (Pressey et al 2003, Loreau et al 2006). We choose 50% because this threshold of habitat loss has been broadly identified as the point at which species extinction risk dramatically increases in intact systems (Noss et al 2012, Pimm et al 2014, Baillie andZhang 2018). Ecosystems that already had <50% of their historic extent lost were given a retention target of 100% of the remaining habitat.Our optimisation model includes objectives representing the averted loss of carbon and hydrological ecosystem service value of each planning unit. Carbon value is quantified as soil organic carbon stocks (SOC) up to 30 cm in depth (t km −2 ; SM 1.4) as conversion to agricultural land uses would result in losses of carbon within this stratum (Assad et al 2013, Yigini et al 2018) that are difficult to restore (Zinn et al 2005, Sommer et al 2018). Following Egoh et al (2008), hydrological value is quantified as water runoff (l yr −1 per hydrological unit), which reflects geomorphic and hydrological processes including land cover, precipitation, evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and recharge (percolation). Our estimations are based on the hydrological models of Thomas (1981) and Angarita et al (2018) (SM 1.5). Conversion to agricultural land use diminishes water provision due to water demands of livestock and crops (Power 2010). Therefore, we assume if a natural area is converted to agriculture, that planning unit's carbon and hydrological value does not contribute to environmental objectives.We formulate this as a mathematical optimisation problem (specifically an integer linear programming problem) and solve it using Gurobi version 8.1.0 (Gurobi Optimisation 2019). See SM 1.1 for mathematical formulation and more details.We explore scenarios that allow thresholds of natural ecosystem conversion of 15% (38 269 km 2 ), 20% (51 025 km 2 ), 30% (76 538 km 2 ) and 40% (102 050 km 2 ) of the landscape, inclusive of areas already cleared (12% of region) using our optimisation framework (figure 2). These thresholds of conversion are politically relevant as analogous ecosystems have lost similar, and higher, amounts of native vegetation cover (for example, the Brazilian Cerrado has lost 46%) (Strassburg et al 2017). For each threshold of total natural ecosystem loss, we evaluate three scenarios to assess the impacts of land conversion. Trade-offs among objectives are quantified for each scenario by evaluating a range of relative weights between agricultural and environmental objectives, solving the optimisation problem each time to obtain a spatially explicit 'solution'. Trade-off curves are, therefore, described by a set of solutions, each of which represents a different weighted sum of objectives. These trade-off curves are the lines presented in figure 3.In the first scenario, we assume agricultural lands are fixed and cannot change to a different land use. The trade-off between agricultural and combined environmental objectives (a composite metric that weights species persistence, carbon sequestration and water retention equally) is quantified among solutions. In the second scenario, agricultural lands are again fixed, and the trade-off between agricultural objectives and single environmental objectives is quantified among solutions separately (rather than with a composite metric) for species persistence, carbon sequestration, and water retention. Ecosystem retention targets are not considered here but were considered in all other scenarios. The third scenario is an extension of the first, where lands already converted to agriculture are allowed to be allocated to other use types and the trade-off between agricultural and environmental objectives are again quantified using the composite environmental metric (table 1).We found that all future loss of natural ecosystems to agriculture will be positively associated with agricultural production value, and negatively associated with biodiversity persistence, and ecosystem service retention (table 2, figures 3, 6).Within a given land conversion threshold, we quantify the trade-off between agricultural production value, species persistence and ecosystem service loss (figure 3). Compromise solutions (solutions that balance agricultural and environmental objectives through equal (0.5:0.5) weighting) achieve on average 95.9%, 96.6%, 96.3% and 96.7% of maximum production value in the 15%, 20%, 30% and 40% land conversion thresholds while reducing negative impacts on species and ecosystem service retention by on average 9.84%, 9.22%, 6.85% and 5.85%, respectively. Hence, the magnitude of possible reductions in environmental impacts for a given threshold of land conversion is relatively small compared to the differences among thresholds of areal land conversion (figure 3). In other words, while negative environmental impacts can be reduced through planning, the reduction is small relative to the impacts of the loss of natural ecosystems.The trade-offs between combined environmental and agricultural objectives indicate that it is possible to achieve gains for species, carbon, and water, with minimal reduction in agricultural benefit through spatial planning, but more so at lower land conversion thresholds (figure 3-solid lines). We found that at higher thresholds of loss, there is less opportunity to reduce negative impacts on the environment (table 3 -Scenario i). Additionally, there is more opportunity to reduce negative impacts on water retention and carbon sequestration than to species persistence (table 3-Scenario i, figure 3-solid lines).Trade-offs between single environmental objectives (species persistence, carbon sequestration and water retention) and agricultural objectives are exacerbated when planning for each one independently rather than simultaneously (table 3-Scenario ii, figure 3-dotted lines; figure 4). Therefore, potential realised gains for each environmental objective are higher than those that consider species persistence, carbon sequestration and water retention simultaneously (table 3, figure 3solid lines and dashed lines which represent a composite environmental metric where all objectives are weighted equally versus dotted lines which optimise for single environmental objectives). Intuitively, the environmental objectives not accounted for in these scenarios performed worse (SM 4). This is reflective of the trade-offs that exist among environmental objectives at all conversion thresholds (SM 1.6, SM figure S1.2).Spatial allocations of land use differ greatly between solutions. When optimising for water retention future agricultural land is concentrated to the north (figure 5 The 'can transition' scenarios lead to, on average across solutions, 18 350 km 2 or 54% of land that is currently agriculture to change to a different land use (either a different agricultural type, or to be allocated to the 'natural' zone). Future agricultural and environmental objectives can be better achieved when lands that are currently agriculture are allowed to transition to another land use type (figure 3-dashed lines representing 'can transition scenarios'), compared to when they cannot (figure 3-solid lines representing 'fixed scenarios'). The difference between the two scenarios were on average $316, $402, $868, and $1999 million USD yr −1 , 0.13, 0,14, 0.12 and 0.22 expected local extinctions, 0.03, 0.03, 0.04 and 0.01 million t of SOC loss, and 2.72, 2.80, 2.57 and 1.39 trillion l of water loss yr −1 at the 15%, 20%, 30% and 40% land conversion thresholds. This indicates that the current distribution of land uses does not represent optimal solutions for maximising benefits towards agricultural production value, species persistence, carbon sequestration or water retention.All ecosystem retention targets, which are applied as a constraint within the objective function, can never be met in situations where current agricultural lands are fixed. In the 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40% land conversion thresholds targets cannot be met for 2, 3, 3, and 5 ecosystems respectively (SM 3 table S3.3). These are associated with two endangered savannah ecosystem types, and two endangered and one vulnerable dense forest ecosystem. This is because, due to the current distribution of land use types new expansion is forced into certain ecosystems that it otherwise would not be, were agricultural lands allowed to be re-allocated. In the scenario where existing agricultural land is free to transition to another type, all targets are met.For confidence intervals for all solutions see SM 4.This analysis represents a rare and important opportunity to apply an evidence-based approach for simultaneously informing development and conservation planning in an intact and biodiverse area that is in the process of becoming developed. We found that development so far has had an unnecessarily large impact Table 1. Description of the three scenarios evaluated. Where a dash (-) is present, a range of values were assessed to describe the trade-off curves (presented in figure 3). In every scenario presented here, agricultural expansion targets are equally divided between the respective threshold of loss. Table 3. Percentage increase between the agricultural-focused (which refers to a weighting in the objective function of 1:0 towards agriculture) and the environmental-focused solutions (which refers to a weighting in the objective function of 0:1 towards overall environmental objectives). Values are for the scenario that considers combined environmental objectives (scenario i; differences between either end of the trade-off curves presented in figure 3-solid lines) and for the scenario that considers single environmental objectives (scenario ii; differences between either end of the trade-off curves presented in figure 3-dotted lines). on biodiversity and ecosystem services outcomes (figure 3-solid 'fixed scenarios' versus dashed lines 'can transition scenarios') and as such, an 'opportunity debt' has been created, where important opportunities to take advantage of land use allocation to the benefit of economic profit and environmental objectives were missed. We show that through the use of our multiobjective optimisation framework to inform planning, we can address this debt and ensure better future outcomes can be achieved with respect to both agricultural production value and environmental values (figure 3).The fundamental land management decision to be made is what proportion (or conversion threshold) of the landscape should be permitted to be converted to agriculture. This threshold had the strongest influence on both agricultural production benefit and loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services (table 2, figure 3). For a given threshold of total land conversion, our spatially explicit planning framework provides important opportunities to minimise impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services while maintaining high production values. Within the Orinoquia, planning can reduce some of the negative impacts that development has on species and ecosystem persistence, carbon sequestration and water provision, at all thresholds of conversion. As the proportion of the landscape that is converted increases, there appear to be diminished opportunities to mitigate these impacts (figure 3, table 3).Our analysis indicates that it is not possible to maximise the performance of planning solutions against all three environmental objectives simultaneously, and trade-offs exist among them (figure 3dotted lines 'single environmental objective scenario' versus solid lines 'fixed/combined environmental scenarios', SM 1.6), indicating that land use planners must carefully consider the relative importance of each objective. However, we have identified planning solutions that represent a compromise between these environmental objectives. The relative importance of the objectives can be readily adjusted to reflect the values of different decision-makers and stakeholders.Greater protection of ecosystem service provision can be made if some areas that are currently agriculture are restored to a natural state (figure 3-solid 'fixed scenarios' versus dashed lines 'can transition scenarios'). Grazing lands within the region are stocked at low density and many have not been severely degraded (Smith et al 1997), therefore some areas are likely amenable to restoration with good potential for recovery of ecosystem function and relatively minor impact on agricultural production (Usma and Trujillo 2011). In addition to protected area planning, activities that restore or prevent deterioration of lightly degraded lands, such as low density grazing lands, should be considered. Obstacles to ecosystem restoration associated with de facto land ownership may require government intervention in the form of incentive programs, such as payment schemes for ecosystem services, and enforcement in legally protected areas. The current distribution of agricultural lands prevents meeting ecosystem representation targets for 2, 3, 3, and 5 ecosystems in the 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40% land conversion thresholds respectively (see SM 3 table S3.3). Conservation planning for these ecosystems should prevent further loss of native vegetation and consider restoration of low productivity agricultural lands. It is important to consider both species and ecosystem representation as planning for one does not necessarily account for the other (Polak et al 2015).This analysis can inform two major current policy initiatives in Colombia. The National Agricultural Frontier (Frontera Agricola Nacional) is a national government-defined agricultural zone, which aims to guide the formulation of public policy, focus and enhance investments and management of the agricultural and rural development sector, promote efficient use of land, streamline social ordering of the rural property, and contribute to stabilizing and reducing the loss of ecosystems of environmental importance by dictating where agriculture should and should not expand (MADR 2016). While excluding protected areas and some forested ecosystems, the full development of this zone would be associated with a conversion threshold of approximately 75% in the Orinoquia, which our analysis indicates would be associated with large losses of biodiversity and ecosystem service values. While the results of our study cannot determine the maximum threshold of land conversion that should be permitted, as this depends on the values of national and regional stakeholders, our framework and results can inform this decision by providing an objective, transparent, evidence-based approach to assessing the consequences of different thresholds of conversion, and inform decisions about compromises between agricultural development and environmental protection. The second policy initiative is ZIDRES (Areas of Interest for Rural, Economic and Social Development), which supports agricultural development projects within government-defined rural zones across Colombia (El congreso de Colombia 2016). Although the ZIDRES initiative still lacks explicit expansion targets and environmental objectives (beyond the criteria that environmental sustainability must be considered), the zones cover 37% of the Orinoquia and our framework could be used within these to achieve development objectives (once explicitly defined) while minimising the loss of environmental values.The assumption that planning units converted to agriculture provide no effective value to biodiversity is warranted because, while there are exceptions, most of the species considered are strongly dependent on native savannah habitat, and agricultural lands when intensely farmed may be unlikely to support sustainable populations of species (Fleischner 1994, Alkemade et al 2013, Newbold et al 2015, Pardo et al 2018, 2019). Furthermore, we assume that once a planning unit is converted to agriculture it contributes no water to downstream regions, which we believe is reasonable as most water resources would be allocated to sustaining agriculture (Hanasaki et al 2010, Power 2010). The assumption that there would be significant SOC loss once an area is converted to agriculture is justified because this is a well-observed outcome following land conversion and disturbance (Zinn et al 2005, Klumpp et al 2009, Sommer et al 2018). Therefore, for the purpose of this analysis, we assume that agricultural land uses contribute no value to environmental objectives; however, future studies might quantify and account for each land uses respective biodiversity, water, and carbon loss as compared to the natural state. We also assume that protected areas are effective at preventing ecosystem conversion. However, illegal clearing of land is a substantial concern in this region (Armenteras et al 2019), implying that enforcement of protected areas will be essential when implementing land use planning.This work could be further advanced by considering the reduction in negative environmental impacts or differences in yields that might occur through different intensities of farming or sustainable agricultural practices such as promotion of traditional cattleranching or Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil certified palm oil. We have shown that loss can be reduced through careful spatial allocation of land uses, and further reductions not quantified here may come from best practices. Additionally, we considered the entire Orinoquia region as a whole, and defined agricultural expansion targets for the entire region. However, different departments in the region sometimes behave independently from one another. Implementation of an Orinoquia-wide plan would require coordinating revenue sharing among departments, perhaps through a payment for ecosystem services framework, so that regions in which protected areas are concentrated are not penalised economically. We also do not account for the additional cost of changing one land use to another in the 'can transition' scenario, only the potential production value of a parcel of land for a given commodity. We included only five agricultural commodities and have not considered the variations in production value among producers that occur due to the scale of farming practices. Our framework could be further developed to include more commodities, and economic data relating to scale of production and the costs of transformation of crops to secondary products.For regions such as the Orinoquia where the loss of intact ecosystems to agricultural expansion is inevitable, development must be strategically planned in order to avoid unnecessary impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Given that the magnitude of the impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services are driven primarily by targets for land conversion, the key policy decision is what those targets should be. Spatial planning can improve outcomes for species persistence, ecosystem retention, carbon sequestration, water provision and agricultural production value to avoid accrual of further opportunity debt that exists due to previous unplanned expansion. The novel spatially explicit, quantitative, multi-objective framework presented here is designed to help decisionmakers solve the difficult challenge of meeting development goals while minimising negative impacts to the environment through strategic land use planning. It differs from approaches which are typically designed for transformed or fragmented landscapes, and can be applied to any relatively intact environment that is being opened up for development, where minimising loss of core environmental values is a key objective."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3791587112.json b/main/part_2/3791587112.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a4c549228107018f9dd19d8c24484af5f6b14b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3791587112.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b887993feb41f7dc8fde39295e05db70","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4c8d8b5f-95e8-4ef8-8032-72216aa94416/retrieve","id":"1770930218"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ab701602-8e70-4788-967c-90f3ea555669","content":"Le virus de la str;ure est gemeralement considers comme la malad,e la plus repandue et la plus importante du rna' is en Afrique subsaharienne. II s'aglt4la d'un probleme chronique qUi, merne s'il n'atteint pas loujours des proportions epidemiques. affecte essentiel1ement les petits exploltants qUI ne dlsposent nl de la maln-d'ceuvre nI de I'equtpement teur permettanl de planter la totalite de leur mai s en debut de salson. Plus lis semen! tardivement. plus lis s'exposent aux eftets nUISlbles du virus.La percee la plus spectaculaire de I'IITA en mallere d'amelioratlon du ma\"is a ete la mise au pOint d'un systeme pratique de cnblage pour la resistance au virus de la stnure qUI peul eIre utilise a grande ache lie au champ. Ce systeme a permis de produlre une gamme vanee de germoplasme resistant et adapte aux differenles agroecologies de l'Afrique subsaharienne. II permet par ailleurs d'identilier une resistance oligogemque durable. Etant donne que la resistance a la striure ne comporte aucune penalite pourle rendement ni d'eHets secondaires in desirables, il s'agil. maintenant qu'une bonne technique de criblage existe, d 'incorporer la resistance a la stnure dans toutes les vanetes avant leur dissemination dans la region . Pour partlclper a la realisation de cet obJectl', I'IITA a aide les programmes nationaux de recherche agronomique a Introduire cette methode de cnblage pour la resistance a la stnure dans leur travail de selection habitue!.CeNe brochure va un peu plus lOin dans Ie cadre de ce\\1e assistance. Nous esperons que les programmes natlonaux de la region I'utiliseront au mieux et attendons leurs reactions quant a I'utilit,; de cette publication.a I'lnstitut international d'agriculture tropicale (IITA) a Ibadan (Nigeria). Au fil des annees, des modifications et ameliorations ont ete effectuees (Leuchner et al. 1980;Soto et al. 1986;Alam 1983;Dabrowski 1983).Cicadulina pour Ie criblage en vue de la resistance au virus de la striure du mais (VSM) .Le virus de la striure du ma'is (VSM) Le virus de la slriure du mars (VSM) constitue I'une des maladies les plus importantes sur Ie plan economique en Afrique subsaharienne. On Ie trouve seulement en Afrique et dans les iles autour du continent au il est largement distribue et transm is par les cicadelles du genre Cicadulina. Le VSM se rencontre dans les zones de foret et de savane a diverses altitudes (de 0 a 2000 mI.Certaines annees, les degats causes sur Ie ma• is peuvent etre insignifiants alors que d'autres, les epidemies de VSM peuvent parfois devaster les cultures et provoquerdes pertes de rendement de 100% (Fajemisin et Shoyinka, 1976). La gravite de la maladie est generalement liee a I'age de la plante au moment de !'infection ainsi qu'a la sensibilita de la variate. Plus la plante est jeune, plus les sympt6mes de la maladie sont prononces. A 1 'llTA, les perles de rendement dans des conditions d'infestation artificielle de quatre varietes prasentant divers degres de resistance/sensibilite allaient de 10 a 72%.Les syrnpt6rnes du VSM sont des bandes blanches chlorotiques discontinues a presque continues qui se forment sur et Ie long de la nervure et couvrent la quasi-totalite de la surface foHaire (Fig. 1). La den site des bandes depend de la sensibilite de la variete. Les plants de mars son! sensibles au VSM depuis I'emergence jusqu'a la formation des panicules. Les plants sensibles infectes artificiellement au stade de plantule se rabougrissent et peuvent merne maurir au produire de petits epis mal remplis (Fajemisin et at. 1976;Rossel et Thottappilly. 1985).Vlngt-deux ( 22) eieadettes du genre Cicadulina ant ete signa lees dont dix-huit en Afrique (Webb, 1987). Seules huit espeees sont reconnues veetriees du VSM (tableau 1).Les eieadettes Cicadulina ant une longueur variant de 2,2 a 3,8mm (Rose, 1978). Leur eouleur varie egalement mais ee sont generalement les teintes jaune pale a dore qui prevalent. Certaines eSp9ces ont des taches noires sur les ailes anterieures, le pronotum et I'abdomen . La face dorsale de I'abdomen est QE!neralemenl brune. La plupan des espeees ant deux taches rondes brunes sur la panie anterieure du front (Ruppel , 1965). La femelle Cicadulina sa distingue du male par son long Qviscapte. References Storey, 1925Storey, 1936Storey, 1936Fennah, 1960Rose, 1962Okoth et Dabrowski , Okoth et Dabrowski, 1987Dabrowski, 1987a. tt est diffieile d'identifier les especes Cicadulina. Cependant, eettes-CI presenten! des differences marquees quant auxorganes genitaux males. La forme et la taitte de I'organe eopulateur ainsi que la forme des saillies du pygophore sonl des traits utiles dans la differeneiation des espeees Cicadulina (Ruppel. 1965: van Rensburg . 1983: Webb, 1987 (Dabrowski, 1985). (Rose, 1978;Okoth et Dabrowski, 1987). En Qutre. on peul echantillonner sur Ie ble irrigue el les graminees poussanl au bard des fleuves , lacs. ou au fond des vailees. Cicadulina presenles dans la cage ne puissent pas s'echapper.Insectes qui se trouvent a I'lnteneur de la cage so lent attires par la lumlere qUi penetre par Ie cote grillage (fig. 6). Capturer ; ! Le meilleur hole pour la ponle desceuls chez les lemelles C,cadulina eslle pelil mil, Pennisetum americanum (; typhoides). A niTA. on a oblenu sur eel hole, jusqu'a 220 ceuls par lemelle (Dabrowski, 1987b). Le mil a eel avanlage supplemenlaire sur Ie mais de pouvoir tolerer une forte den site de population de cicadelles sans encourir trop de degats. Utiliser pour I'oviposition des plants en pol vieux de 14 jours. Selection en vue de la resistance au VSM (Storey, 1932). Ce trait peul eIre controle genetiquement. En cas d'elevage en masse de Cicadulina, il est important de maintenir un pourcentage eleva (60 a 80 %) de transmetteurs aelils dans la colonie. Ceci permettra de reduire Ie nombre d'insectes necessaire pour infester chaque plant; ce qui se traduira en fin de compte par davantage de plants inlestas en utilisant Ie meme nombre de cicadelles. Par contre. il sera necessaire de proceder a un controle periodique de la qualite.Pour tester la proportion de transmetteurs actifs, environ 50 a 100 cicadelles femelles doivent etre prelevees dans une cage d'elevage de larves etlachees pendant 48 heures dans une autre petite cage contenant des plants de mais infestes par Ie virus de la striure. Encager ensuite ces insectes femelles individuellement avec des plants de maIs sensibles au VSM, vieux de 5 a 7 jours, en utilisant des cages en PVC (fig. 7). Environ 7 a 10 jours plus tard, certains plants de mai•s presentent deja les symptomes de la striure et Ie pourcentage de transmission peut donc etre calcule. Si ce pourcentage est inferieur a 35%, il faudra demarrer une nouvelle colonie de transmeUeurs actifs en regroupant les descendants des femelles qui ont bien transmis Ie VSM . De la me me maniere, les plants montrant des symptomes de VSM a la suite des tests de transmission devront etre regroupes dans une cage pour I'eclosion des 03ufs et Ie developpement larvaire. Au bout de trois semaines, les larves donneront des adulles et la nouvelle colonie de cicadelles aura une proportion plus elevee de transmetteurs acfifs. Cette nouvelle colonie pourra etre utilisee pour augmenter la population des transmetleurs aclifs. Le pourcentage de transmetteurs actifs d'une colonie doit etre veri fie deux fois par an. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3795028832.json b/main/part_2/3795028832.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..386e5017d19ddd3d848ca8f62c321952accada2c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3795028832.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"331ef07353c51adf56aed17e1bcecd48","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/42022f33-6eca-4d6a-9491-80db77c841c2/retrieve","id":"180620921"},"keywords":["nitrogen fixation","animal production","technology transfer"],"sieverID":"fbce3c34-6a09-401f-9d98-7482ac3b2376","content":"1. Examples of successful adoption of forage legumes are reported from all continents, where they delivered profitability and often provided multipurpose benefits to farmers. 2. Factors vital to successful adoption were: meeting the needs of farmers; building relevant partnerships; understanding the socio-economic context and skills of farmers; participatory involvement with rural communities; and long-term involvement of champions. 3. Organisation of seed supply, achieving scale-up and forming partnerships to implement adoption are key features. 4. Legumes remain an important but under-exploited resource for tropical farming systems.The alternative to legumes will be greater and more costly use of N-fertilisers and purchased protein concentrates. 5. The R&D organisations will need to provide long-term support and greater investment for legume technologies to deliver benefits to farmers. Support will be needed for training and education programmes to overcome declining availability of forage legume expertise and lack of awareness of opportunity for use of tropical forage legumes.Reviews of the uptake of tropical forage legumes around the world have revealed that the original promise of legume technology has not been fully realised (Thomas & Sumberg, 1995;Elbasha et al., 1999;Peters & Lascano, 2003). Pengelly et al. (2003) concluded that 'despite 50 years of investment in forage research in the tropics, forage adoption has been relatively poor across all tropical farming systems'.In Africa, Sumberg (2002) reported that fodder legumes have not achieved their potential in sub-Saharan Africa despite 70 years of R&D promoting forage legumes. He queried the longheld view that the introduction of legumes into mixed farming systems was the key to their upgrade. A similar situation existed in Latin America and the Caribbean. Between 1980 and 2000, of 14 legume cultivars that were released none was well adopted (Peters & Lascano, 2003). Miles & Lascano (1997) reported that 'the impact of Stylosanthes spp. (stylos) on tropical American livestock production was not proportional to the research literature generated over the past 30 years or so'. In the southern US, the impact of tropical forage legumes has also been relatively small (Williams et al., 2005;Sollenberger & Kalmbacher, 2005).However, in spite of the overall consensus that adoption has been lower than expected, there have been many examples of successful uptake of forage legumes. There are good examples of successful adoption of legumes in regions of Asia, especially the use of Stylosanthes spp. in India (Ramesh et al., 2005), China (Guodao & Chakborty, 2005), and Thailand (Phaikaew & Hare, 2005). Multipurpose tree legumes have played an important role in southeast Asia where Leucaena leucocephala has been a significant forage species in the Nusa Tenggara Timor (NTT) Province of Indonesia (Piggin, 2003), and in the Batangas Province of the Philippines. Gliricidia sepium (Gliricidia) is widely used in Indonesia and the Philippines, and leguminous cover crops in the rubber and oil palm plantations of Malaysia have been widely used since the 1800s. In Australia, tropical legumes have also had a significant impact, although only a small number (<10) of the >70 legume cultivars that have been officially released by Government agencies since 1910 have made a noteworthy impact on the pastoral industry.There is an emerging view in developing countries that grasses are being adopted more quickly and more strongly than legumes. Legumes were regarded as less resilient than grasses under cutting or grazing, benefits were largely long-term in nature, and grass/legume systems were more complex to manage (Peters & Lascano, 2003). Similarly, in East Africa, the rapid adoption of grasses, such as Pennisetum purpureum (napier grass) in cut and carry systems, contrasted with the lack of adoption of herbaceous legumes (Omore et al., 1999). Miles & Lascano, (1997) and Andrade et al. (2004) reported that farmers in Latin America did not appreciate the benefits of legumes. Therefore, for adoption to occur, even of the best cultivars, they argued that targeted education programmes, successful demonstrations and favourable profitability were needed. The objective of targeting low-cost improvement of grass pastures to improve dry season feeding, which worked well in Australia, was not successful in Latin America. Sumberg (2002) suggested that legumes were not just limited by adoption constraints, but that even under favourable circumstances, scientists need to accept that they may not be able to reliably deliver economic benefits to African farmers where there is no tradition of planting legumes for fodder.In many instances, lack of adoption could be related to failure of the technology for technical or socio-economic reasons, i.e. the technology did not live up to expectations and/or was not targeted at the appropriate production system.In Latin America, a major reason for failure of the Australian Stylosanthes cultivars Schofield, Cook and Endeavour in commercial pastures was devastation by the anthracnose pathogen. That the cultivars did not persist under grazing was another significant disadvantage. This led to widespread disappointment among farmers, extension workers and consultants (Andrade et al., 2004). Lack of persistence was also cited as a reason for lack of adoption of forage legumes in Africa (Boonman, 1993). In Florida, the slow uptake of Aeschynomene americana and Desmodium heterocarpon was due to an underestimation of the difficulty of establishing and maintaining the legumes in Paspalum notatum (bahia grass) pastures. Farmers found that neither legume was dependable when grown with this competitive grass (Sollenberger & Kalmbacher, 2005).Socioeconomic factors contributed to the lack of adoption of intercropping and legumes in communal grazing. Attempts to promote intercropping of maize with legumes in East Africa failed due to the high cost of technology, variable rainfall and lack of interest in innovation by older farmers (Ndove et al., 2004). Similarly, Maasdorp et al. (2004) found that promoting the multi-purpose use of Mucuna pruriens (mucuna) failed due to lack of interest in green manuring or intercropping, due partly to labour constraints of the cash-cropping farmers. Elbasha et al. (1999) reported that legume adoption in West Africa was constrained by lack of extension information, credit and seed, high costs of fencing, shortage of labour, insecurity of land tenure and land scarcity, livestock diseases, invasion by weeds, and fire damage. Where land tenure is uncertain, most researchers report failure of adoption. Farmers were simply not interested in investing in their land when they had no assurance of being able to reap the benefits. Pasture improvement technology applied to communal grazed lands by government supported projects, usually suffered from a lack of interest by the pastoralists involved (Pengelly et al., 2003).Failure of the key stakeholders to form effective partnerships between farmers and public and private institutions was often cited as reason for lack of adoption (Miles, 2001), leading to ineffective release and follow-up procedures. Andrade et al. (2004) stated that, while the release of Stylosanthes macrocephala cv. Pioneiro overcame deficiencies of earlier stylo cultivars, the cultivar was not promoted. With no extension support there was no interest from private seed companies, as they did not see a large market.Lack of establishment of a reliable seed production and supply system to ensure that high quality seed was available at a reasonable price was regularly cited as a key reason for adoption failure, e.g. for Stylosanthes in Latin America (Peters & Lascano, 2003), Vigna unguiculata (cowpea) in Nigeria (Kristjanson et al., 2004) and Aeschynomene americana (aeschynomene) and Desmodium heterocarpon (carpon desmodium) in Florida (Sollenberger & Kalmbacher, 2005). Andrade et al. (2004) reported that of 3 Australian and 10 South American Stylosanthes cultivars released into the South American market, seed is available for only two -Mineirão (S. guianensis var. vulgaris) and Campo Grande (a mixture of S. capitata & S. macrocephala).Lack of a participatory approach was also cited as a reason for ineffective promotion of legume technology. Douthwaite et al. (2002) criticised the International Research Centres for basing their approach on scientific enquiry independent of social factors, rather than on a 'learning selection model' that builds on farmer and group experiences.Difficulties with promotion and use of forage legumes, and the consequent low adoption rates, are of great concern to the R&D community. Without improved levels of adoption, and explicit demonstration of the relevance and benefits of forage legumes, the good will and support of funding and donor agencies will diminish (Shelton et al., 2000), preventing the realisation of much potential advantage for rural communities.Our analysis of 19 successful case studies (Table 1) revealed that greater adoption success has been achieved in Asia and Australia than in Africa, the US or Latin America, although Brazil had some notable successes. Stylosanthes species and tree legume species dominated the success case studies, while species that delivered multipurpose benefits, such as V. unguiculata in West Africa and Pueraria phaseoloides (kudzu) in Brazil, were also important. Arachis spp. were successful in niche environments and were being adopted in three of the case studies.Authors of the papers on successful legume adoption prioritised the adoption factors that they considered were important to success. Based on their expert opinion and knowledge of each case study, they were asked to allocate 100 points among a list of possible adoption factors to reflect the relative significance of the factors. This subjective analysis indicated that five key factors were important. The most important was that the technology met a need of farmers. The other factors (which were similar in their priority) were: the socio-economic situation of farmers was conducive to adoption; partnerships between relevant stake-holders (government, private, farmers) were in place; there was long term commitment by key players; and a farmer centred research and extension programme was implemented.The gross economic benefits were naturally highest where large-scale adoption had occurred e.g. from adoption of Stylosanthes in West Africa, southern China, or northern Australia, Leucaena leucocephala (leucaena) in Queensland, and from adoption of P. phaseoloides in the Amazon of Brazil (Table 1).The technology met a need of farmers Adoption of legumes occurred when the technology met farmers' needs, although the particular need to be met varied among farmers and regions. Examples include: • West Africa; V. unguiculata was adopted because it provided multiple benefits, e.g. grain for human consumption, fodder for livestock, and opportunity to rotate with cereals to reduce the impact of the parasite Striga hermonthica which causes loss of grain yield (Tarawali et al., 2005b). • East Africa; farmers lacked adequate protein for their stall-fed dairy cows and goats, but did not want to spend scarce cash on expensive concentrates. They preferred instead to plant fodder shrubs (primarily Calliandra calothyrsus, Leucaena trichandra and Morus alba). The shrubs required only small amounts of labour for planting and harvesting, and farmers found that they could establish tree legume hedges along pathways, field boundaries, and create soil conservation bunds along contours (Franzel et al., 2003).• Northern Australia; graziers found that dryland annual cropping on fertile clay soils was economically marginal due to uncertain rainfall and variable grain prices. In contrast, good cattle prices and the prospect of an agreeable lifestyle change for ageing farmers encouraged them to move to a lower cost but profitable cattle fattening enterprise. This led to the large-scale adoption of both L. leucocephala (Mullen, 2005) and Clitoria ternatea (butterfly pea) (Conway, 2005). • Gulf Coast of the USA; there was a market for high quality hay for the horse and dairy industries. New varieties of Arachis glabrata cv. Florigraze and Arbrook (rhizoma peanut) were well adapted, the equipment for vegetative propagation was available, and it was profitable compared to alternative land uses (Williams et al., 2005). • India; establishment of Stylosanthes to produce leaf meal was a cheap but profitable option for infertile acid soils in arid zones (Ramesh et al., 2005). Establishment was simple with no special equipment required. In southern China, there was also a need for high protein leaf meal for the large numbers of livestock in the region (ruminants and non-ruminants).Stylosanthes was well adapted and met this need (Guodao & Chakraborty, 2005). • Nusa Tenggara Timor Province of Indonesia; there was serious land degradation (erosion and weeds) in Amarasi and Sikki Districts in the 1930s. The high population densities required a change from swidden agriculture to sedentary agriculture. Alternatives, such as hand-made terraces failed as they were too labour intensive and difficult to construct. In Amarasi District, farmers found that they could rotate L. leucocephala with corn to improve fertility and thus corn production, and the L. leucocephala could be used to feed tethered cattle and housed goats (Piggin, 2003). Lantana camara (Lantana) was largely eliminated as a weed problem by the system and L. leucocephala provided wood for a variety of uses.The analysis indicated that success could be achieved when the technology led to profitability, on-farm environmental benefits such as fertility improvement or weed control, and other multipurpose benefits -often there was a combination of several benefits. However, most successful examples of adoption of forage legumes were unambiguously profitable for the adopter. Farmers normally choose profit, food and income security, before environmental protection (Peters et al., 2001). However, many scientists and government development personnel continue to justify the extension of forage legume technology by promoting natural resource management benefits, including off-farm benefits such as carbon sequestration and watershed management. The fundamental need for the legume technology to be firstly profitable and then afford delivery of on-farm environmental services as a secondary priority, cannot be emphasised strongly enough.It is necessary to begin with an understanding of the production system in which the legume will be promoted. From the survey, examples of legume technology matching farmers' socioeconomic situation and skills include: • Eastern Indonesia; farmers found that planting of L. leucocephala was compatible with local farming systems. It could be interplanted into maize patches without decreasing maize yield, and then rotated with maize as a soil fertility building exercise (Piggin, 2003). In China, production of leaf meal from Stylosanthes planted into young rubber plantation forests, or horticultural systems provided an income stream for a large and inexpensive workforce, especially women (Guodao & Chakraborty, 2005).• Queensland Australia; graziers needed an intensive, highly productive pasture beef fattening system, capable of delivering similar weight gains to feedlots in order to meet different market options. Those graziers with previous dryland cropping experience had less difficulty in establishing hedge-rows of L. leucocephala than graziers without this experience (Mullen, 2005). • Asia; the introduction of well-adapted Stylosanthes spp. into communal grazing lands in Northeast Thailand was an easy low cost strategy that delivered multiple benefits (improved livestock diets and improved land fertility) and was therefore well suited to the socio-economic conditions of the region. While many argue that it is not feasible to improve forage on communal lands due to lack of management (Cramb, 2000;Pengelly et al., 2004), it was possible in Thailand due to Government sponsorship of the improvement. Nevertheless, due to overgrazing and changed land use, the benefits of this oversowing strategy have been less than what could be achieved on private land (Phaikaew & Hare, 2005). In India, State and Federal Governments and NGOs also had long-running programmes (25 years) of support for revegetation of village commons and watersheds (Ramesh et al., 2005). • Nepal; in the mid-hill farming areas, small farm size and intensive cropping practices, coupled with back-yard dairy production, created the socio-economic environment for immediate interest and adoption of Arachis pintoi (forage peanut). Farmers in the region were accustomed to vegetative propagation, and there were many niche environments where A. pintoi could be planted (Robertson, 2005). In Lombok Indonesia, rice farmers needed to improve the diets of goats and cattle fed rice straw. They found that Sesbania grandiflora (sesbania) was tolerant of waterlogging and grew extremely well along the rice bunds without reducing yields of the rice crop. The side branches and leaves were easily harvested for fodder and the main stem was eventually cut to provide timber and poles. Nursing mothers also found S. grandiflora to be a nutritious vegetable.The experiences reviewed in Table 1 also confirm that simple innovations are more quickly adopted than complex ones, e.g. a new variety of Stylosanthes was more readily accepted in northeast Thailand (Phaikaew & Hare, 2005) or in northern Australia (Rains, 2005) than a new farming system such as the L. leucocephala system in Indonesia (Piggin, 2003), or Australia (Mullen, 2005). After 20 years of R&D into suitable Stylosanthes cultivars for the Brazilian savannas, Campo Grande was finally released in 2000. This cultivar overcame earlier difficulties with lack of persistence, susceptibility to anthracnose disease and poor seed production, and by 2004, more than 500 t of seed had been produced and sown on almost 150,000 ha of grass pastures (Fernandes et al., 2005).All of the successful case studies have involved the formation of critical partnerships between the significant stakeholders (Williams et al., 2005;Conway, 2005). In Nusa Tenggara Timor in Indonesia, local village heads, NGOs, church groups, the Dutch Administration, and government departments all showed great commitment to L. leucocephala adoption (Piggin, 2003). Local administrators instituted new regulations creating a favourable policy environment for adoption to proceed. These included (a) enforcement of tethering to replace free grazing; (b) credit provided only to those who agreed to plant L. leucocephala; (c) promotion of erosion control programmes; (d) regulations requiring the obligatory planting of L. leucocephala (1932 & 1948); and (e) promotion of cattle husbandry in livestock distribution schemes. Partnerships that integrated a mechanism for supply of good quality seed at a reasonable price were essential for success (Kristjanson et al., 2004). Similarly, where successful adoption involved vegetatively propagated species such as Arachis spp. (Robertson, 2005;Williams et al., 2005;Lascano et al., 2005), an accessible supply of planting material was essential. In some developing countries, legume seed production was achieved by contracting smallholder farmers to produce the seed for government or NGO groups. This approach was first used in the 70s in northeast Thailand to produce seed of Stylosanthes humilis (Wickham et al., 1977), and was consolidated by continuing support from the Thai Government for a further 25 years (Phaikaew & Hare, 2005). Approximately 4,500 t of seed have been produced since the scheme commenced (Phaikaew & Hare, 2005). Seed is now exported as well as being purchased for local programmes, and there are farmer to farmer seed sales. Seed producers exported 3 t of S. guianensis CIAT184 and 8-9 t S. hamata cv. Verano in 2002 and 2003 (Phaikaew et al., 2004). A 'Thai club of seed producers' was formed to handle production and marketing. The Department of Land Development assists with monitoring of seed quality and testing, seed marketing, and seed packaging and storage. Successful contracting of seed production to smallholders has also occurred in India where Government has supported Stylosanthes seed production (Ramesh et al., 2005); in Bolivia where the NGO Empresa de Semillas Forrajeras SEFO -SAM has supported production of a variety of legume species for export (G. Sauma, pers. comm.); and in Benin where purchase of M. pruriens seed from farmers by the NGO Sasakawa Global occurred (Douthwaite et al., 2002). However, partnerships that link smallholder seed production with the private sector should be sought to provide long-term continuity of seed supply.For broadacre plantings, such as are found in Latin America, the USA and Australia, seed production is normally handled by specialist private seed merchants (Conway, 2005;Williams et al., 2005;Mullen, 2005). Lack of reliable seed supply has limited adoption of Stylosanthes spp. in Brazil, Centrosema pascuorum in the Northern Territory of Australia, and Arachis pintoi in Colombia (Lascano et al., 2005). Andrade et al., (2004) reported that release of new Stylosanthes cultivars with high seed yield potential was vital, in order to gain the support of seed producers in Brazil. The seed company that marketed the Stylosanthes variety Mineirão from 1996, found that low seed yields, and consequent high market prices, led to a relatively large number of buyers purchasing small amounts of seed. Consequently from 2000, the seed firm mixed Mineirão and Campo Grande (1:3) as a strategy to facilitate sales of Mineirão.Partnerships with researchers were also an integral part of the successful case studies. Researchers needed to be available to solve problems and progress the technology. In Kenya, researchers have introduced new species (Leucaena trichandra and Morus alba) to reduce farmers' dependence on Calliandra calothyrsus (calliandra). Diversification is important for minimising the effect of a pest or disease attack on any one species, and also for providing a more balanced feed ration (Franzel et al., 2003). In Australia, the beef industry is supporting the breeding of a psyllid resistant Leucaena spp., and research into the management of subclinical DHP toxicity, which was recently observed in Queensland cattle herds (Mullen, 2005). Cramb (2000), agreed that successful adoption occurred where there was a timely formation of a 'flexible' coalition of key stakeholders, whose interests converge sufficiently so that their joint resources focus on achieving the adoption outcomes.Most successful case studies have occurred over a long time period e.g. 10-50 years (Shelton et al., 2000). In central Kenya, 10 years elapsed between the start of the first on-farm trial and the wide-scale uptake of fodder shrubs by farmers. Elbasha et al. (1999) noted that realisation of benefits from use of tropical legumes took at least 15 years in West Africa and at least 20 years in Australia. Kristjanson et al. (2004) indicated that 20 years were needed to extend the results of Vigna unguiculata research in Nigeria. Strategies that have immediate and profitable short-term benefits will be favoured. This was the case with milk production systems in Kenya where adoption of Calliandra occurred relatively quickly as dairy producers responded to the immediate increase in milk yield and the opportunity to reduce their use of expensive concentrates. In Brazil, Arachis pintoi was quickly adopted in the Amazon due to the introduction of environmental regulations preventing more clearing of forested lands.Successful adoption was also associated with dedicated champions who were willing to commit their time to achieving a successful outcome (Williams et al., 2005;Conway, 2005;Mullen, 2005;Ramesh et al., 2005). Examples include northeast Thailand where interest in the promotion of Stylosanthes commenced in the 1970s with Thai, New Zealand and Australian input. This was followed by World Bank support, and now Japanese support. A key factor was the continuing support from the Thai Department of Livestock Development, and consistent support from key individuals. Such sustained donor support is critical to ensuring the success of the technology.Many workers have pointed to the need for a close interactive working relationship with farmers in order to achieve adoption. Horne et al. (2000) were critical of the lack of participatory involvement with farmers during 40 years of forage development programmes in southeast Asia. They proposed an intensive interactive programme of discussion, interviews and on-farm trials jointly conducted with farmers to identify the best solutions to problems identified by the farmers. Tuhulele et al. (2000) reporting experiences using Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) tools found that careful selection of participating farmers was important and that good facilitation and communication skills with farmers were essential. However, a flexible approach is necessary so that farmer innovations can be absorbed into the technology recommendations and passed on. Further improvements occurred as farmers experimented with the technology, e.g. in Kenya, researchers encouraged farmers to conduct their own experiments, called 'farmer-designed trials', in which farmers planted Calliandra as they wished. Several important lessons emerged from these trials, and were incorporated into extension recommendations, including planting in different niches and planting Calliandra between rows of Pennisetum purpureum, and between Grevillea robusta trees along field boundaries. Braun & Hocdé (2000), referred to the need to change the orientation of existing R&D structures and to develop sustainable community based research capacity. This has happened in northern Australia where graziers have the major say in establishing priorities for research expenditure in the northern Australian beef industry (via the Northern Australia Beef Research Committee). A network of Leucaena growers has formed 'The Leucaena Network', and has played a major advocacy role promoting research, negotiating with government agencies regarding environmental issues, and conducting training courses for growers.Within the participatory framework, it was important to ensure that accurate and practical information on the technology was readily available and transmitted to farmers using an appropriate vehicle. Wortman & Kirungu (2000), considered that smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa were influenced by government extension services, neighbours, relatives, schools and radio. Ndove et al. (2004) reported that adoption of legumes in maize cropping systems was assisted by training, demonstrations, tours and on-farm experiments. In Australia, the five most important information sources for graziers were rural newspapers, local Department of Agriculture, national radio, neighbours and stock & station agents (Anon., 2004).The future of the tropical ruminant livestock sector seems assured with predictions of continuing strong demand for livestock products due to population increase (Kristjanson et al., 2004), and to an increasingly prosperous middle class in developing countries. It will be the integrated crop-livestock smallholder systems of Africa and Asia, and to a lesser extent Latin America, that will be the major suppliers of meat and milk (Delgado et al., 1999). However, production systems will need to intensify to meet demand for higher quality products, while remaining environmentally sustainable. In Africa, there is a move from pastoralism to sedentary farming, requiring greater inputs and a more sustainable production system (J. Lenné, pers. comm). In Asia, smallholder livestock farmers are moving from herding systems to tethering systems, or to intensive penned animal systems that require cutand-carry forage (Fujisaka et al., 2000). Most are planting high yielding grasses to supplement dry season crop residues, and many now purchase feed concentrates to supply protein, energy and minerals thereby improving productivity, especially milk production. As production systems intensify, the inability of farmers to adequately feed their livestock year round will be even more important. The outstanding value of legumes in general and of Calliandra in particular is needed to meet this dry season feed gap, with the additional benefit of increased intake of associated poor quality roughage (Shelton, 2004b). It is not surprising that tree legumes figure strongly among the successful case studies. They are multipurpose, and their superior rooting depth delivers excellent water use efficiency and drought tolerance (Shelton, 2004a).Similarly the broad-scale grazed tropical grass pastures in Australia, Southern USA, and Central and South America will neither be productive or stable unless their N-nutrition is maintained. Declining N status leads to reduced productivity, reduced pasture vigour and weed invasion. Whilst use of inorganic N is feasible in the southern USA (Sollenberger & Kalmbacher, 2005), it is less economically attractive in Australia, Africa, and Latin America.There is an emerging and significant role for legumes as a protein supplement to reduce reliance on expensive concentrates (Franzel & Wambugu, 2005), which often account for a high proportion of direct costs. Related to this is a rapidly increasing demand for legume hay and leaf meal. This is happening in India (Ramesh et al., 2005), China (Guodao & Chakraborty, 2005) and in Latin America (Peters & Lascano, 2003).A considerable amount of adaptation research has already been completed (Pengelly et al., 2004), although there remains a continuing need for germplasm evaluation and genotype X environment studies to better understand the range of environmental niches for legume accessions (Peters & Lascano, 2003). Databases are available, e.g. the CIAT Forage Database (Barco et al., 2002) and SoFT (Selection of Forages for the Tropics) (Pengelly et al., 2005). The web sites of FAO (http://www.fao.org/) and PROSEA (Plant Resources of Southeast Asia) (http://www.prosea.nl/) have species information; and documentation describing the characteristics of a large number of tropical forage legumes is available (Horne & Stür, 1999). Data on forage adaptation and farmer preference have been linked to a GIS system, based on biophysical and socio-economic data for different regions (Peters et al., 2000). It is hoped that it will be possible to extrapolate the forage adaptation data to new regions, by inputting information on production system, market access, and social preference into the GIS-based tool.There are many accessions of legumes currently in world germplasm banks, although this resource is under threat due to lack of adequate funding (Maass & Pengelly, 2001). It is vital that the capability to identify new varieties to meet the continuing challenges of pests and diseases is retained, and that there is access to new accessions for niche environments. On occasion, discarded accessions have become relevant, due to the changed circumstances of farmers, e.g. the success of Clitoria ternatea cv. Milgarra as a ley legume to restore nitrogen fertility in cropping lands in central Queensland occurred many years after it was first evaluated (Conway, 2005).In recent years there has been increasing interest in indigenous species as an alternative to introducing exotic species. There are many reasons for this trend: (a) farming communities have detailed knowledge of their use and value, (b) there are ecological and conservation advantages in using indigenous species, and (c) there is a risk of unwanted weed invasion from exotic species. Indigenous forage tree species have generally been used for subsistence feeding rather than commercial systems. Exotic species are usually more vigorous, and produce higher yields than indigenous species, as they have been carefully selected for use as forage and removed from the challenge of pests and diseases present in their native range (Shelton, 2004). Roothaert & Franzel (2001), noted that most fodder tree screening programmes in Africa involved exotic species, but that the local species offer great potential. The challenge is to find trees that can be propagated easily, are highly nutritious, and can be pruned intensively.Most authors of successful case studies cite the need for readily available cheap seed or planting material of good quality. The use of smallholders for contract growing of seed has worked well in many developing countries. Small-scale production of legume seed has successfully matched the skills and resources of smallholder farmers, and has often involved rural women in seed harvesting and cleaning. Nevertheless, in Kenya despite high adoption of fodder trees, seed marketing is still problematic. Commercial firms have not shown interest in marketing seed, and individual seed growers find it difficult to link with potential buyers, who are usually smallholder farmers interested in buying minute quantities. Many NGOs give away free seed and this is a disincentive for farmers interested in selling seed. However, researchers can facilitate seed marketing in several ways: a) by helping producers to produce high quality seed, b) helping producers link with merchants in areas of high demand, and c) helping merchants to sell seed in small packets (Russell & Franzel, 2004). There is a need to improve the linkages between smallholder seed production and the private seed sector, to ensure long-term continuity of seed supply. Improved levels of adoption will help overcome the problem of low market volume for legume seed, thus encouraging private seed merchants to make investments.In developed countries, a reliable supply of high quality affordable seed is similarly crucial to successful adoption (Conway, 2005;Mullen, 2005;Rains, 2005;Sollenberger & Kalmbacher, 2005). A number of constraints continue to hamper seed production and distribution from private seed companies including: variable environmental conditions affecting production; and variable economic conditions affecting demand (especially export demand); and declining R&D into new varieties. Miles (2001) reported that EMBRAPA (Centro da Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária) and Unipasto (an association of Brazilian pasture seed firms) are collaborating to ensure pasture seed supply in the region.There is considerable debate concerning the respective roles of farmers, technology researchers, socio-economists, and other stakeholders in the adoption process, and the relative contributions that can be made by a traditional scientific approach and by participatory approaches. In reality, the prime movers of adoption programmes will vary. It is often not the local extension service, but may be a farmer organisation, a university, or locally or internationally funded R&D agencies (Braun & Hocdé, 2000). A major problem for all those wishing to promote the use of forage legumes is declining resources, and especially the declining number of pasture scientists in national and international agencies trained in tropical pasture science R&D. Andrade et al. (2004) report that CIAT and national Research agencies in Latin America have reduced their forage research budgets. The number of Australian pasture researchers has declined dramatically over the past decade. Given the increased demand for livestock products, and the clear evidence that poor animal nutrition is the major factor limiting productivity, the need to ensure sustainability of more intensive production systems, national and international agencies will need to increase their investment in education, training, research and extension of tropical pastures if the potential is to be realised.Scientists and development workers are often involved in developing and demonstrating technologies at a small-scale. Scaling-up to large numbers of farmers involves working across villages, districts and provinces. This requires alliances with a multitude of institutions working with farmers, many of which will have limited expertise on forages. The use of expert decision support systems such as SoFT -a database and selection tool for identifying forages adapted to local conditions in the tropics and subtropics, and the linked GIS-based CaNaSTA (Crop Niche Selection for Tropical Agriculture) may assist in this regard. However, these computer tools cannot replace the long-term experience of forage agronomists. Fliert et al. (2000) stated that participatory activities are often characterised by intensive guidance processes, which may limit capacity for up scaling. Tuhulele et al. (2000) recommended an intensive process of interaction with participating farmers using Participatory Research Appraisal (PRA) approaches, but these approaches can create problems in up scaling to new regions due to the heavy involvement of farmers and researchers in the process of promoting the technology (Horne et al., 2000). Some technologies, e.g. maize varieties, spread easily across an area, many fodder legumes require more facilitation because they are 'information-intensive' and involve the learning of new skills. The building of partnerships and coalitions of a range of stakeholders, such as government agencies, NGOs, church organisations, community groups, farmer groups and schools, is the key to successful up scaling (Franzel et al., 2003).Sustaining scaling up and the adoption process is not always possible. Mucuna was adopted by >10,000 hillside farmers in Honduras and several thousands of farmers in Guatemala and Southern Mexico. It was used as a relay crop with maize, delivering benefits for soil fertility, soil structure and weed suppression (Peters et al., 2001). However, due to farms becoming smaller and tenure less secure, much of this policy was reversed. Growth in the cattle industry reduced the area of land available for landless peasant to use the Mucuna-Zea mays rotation, and Zea mays became less attractive relative to other crops and off-farm employment opportunities (Neill & Lee, 2001). In Florida, the availability of cheap nitrogen for use on Nfertilised grass and other more profitable land use options has diminished grazier interest in use of forage legumes (Sollenberger & Kalmbacher, 2005). Market failures and problems with the legume technology can cause the technology to fail. For these reasons, the long-term sustained involvement of researchers to address technical problems is crucial for successful adoption.There is much controversy over the role of computer tools for promoting adoption. Pengelly et al. (2003) argued that simulation modelling combined with socio-economic research would improve adoption. A simulation model assessing year-round feeding strategies for smallholder crop-livestock systems is being developed by ILRI and their partners (Domingo, 2004). The software enables forecasting of livestock performance under varying feeding and management conditions. A similar strategy is being pursued by ACIAR in southern Africa, south Sulawesi and Indonesia, where an integrated livestock, crop, horticultural and economic model of smallholder systems is being developed. However, there is concern that the use of computer tools as an aid to generate adoption options for forages in smallholder crop-livestock systems is a high-risk strategy. It may not be possible to achieve a credible, robust model for the smallholder farmers of Africa, Asia and Latin America, because of lack of technical information for the diversity of situations and the high skill levels and sustained commitment needed to develop and support effective models. It is concluded that computer modelling is not going to be an important contributor to improved adoption outcomes. Instead, it is vital that development workers continue to engage with rural communities in relevant and practical ways, especially since the number of professionally trained forage scientists is declining.Although adoption of tropical legumes worldwide has been less than anticipated, there have been notable adoption successes, especially in Asia and Australia, and to a lesser extent in Brazil. Where data were available the economic returns from adoption have been significant. Successful legumes have included Stylosanthes, tree legumes and niche legumes, such as forage Arachis species. Their characteristics varied greatly, but with some exceptions, they demonstrated persistence, vigour and longevity under grazing or cut and carry systems, ease of establishment (with the exception of Leucaena), and either high seed yield or ease of vegetative propagation. They delivered profitability and multipurpose benefits to farmers, including on-farm environmental benefits.Meeting the needs of farmers was the most significant factor leading to successful uptake of tropical forage legume technology. Other factors vital to successful adoption were (a) the building of a coalition of relevant partnerships, (b) understanding the socio-economic context and skills of farmers and their farming systems, (c) a participatory involvement with the rural communities involved, and (d) the long-term involvement of champions who ensured the process did not stall and that problems were resolved.Nitrogen is the key-sustaining element in tropical farming systems, and as ruminant production systems are intensified, there is great potential and opportunity for exploiting tropical forage legume technology. Leaf meals in particular will become more common in the future. The alternative to legumes will be greater and more costly use of N-fertilisers and purchased protein concentrates.If R&D organisations wish to see the technologies developed from their research programs delivering benefits to farmers, they will need to take extension work more seriously. They will need to be prepared for long-term involvement, and to build partnerships with other organisations with complementary expertise and interest but similar goals. Increased investment will be needed to support R&D programmes, including greater support for long and short-term training and education programmes to overcome declining availability of forage legume expertise and lack of awareness and opportunity for use of tropical forage legumes. Such investment will ensure adoption of tropical forage legume technology, and will increase the economic, environmental and social well being of rural communities."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3796046114.json b/main/part_2/3796046114.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a154e30e0765397dda4ea0b11bcaccfe3ee7487d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3796046114.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"83a5ea11e80835ec3330cff2d675fbbe","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/09ae4a2b-fd51-43d8-b3c7-4b93b6b552ef/retrieve","id":"86919924"},"keywords":["children rights","youth, birth registration","legislation"],"sieverID":"a7c17c7c-a91c-497c-beaa-f5831282d2b6","content":"To improve the rights of unregistered children and young people in Sierra Leone, Plan International has developed a birth registration tool to enable age and identity verification for this vulnerable group. Today, the young participants of the project are accessing their age-appropriate privileges, such as being able to attend school and getting to vote.stakeholder mobilisation, raising awareness and birth information registration. As a 'tool', it is not considered an end in itself but as a means to achieving several ends (education, health, child protection, etc.).In general, a UBR initiative includes: 1. A national workshop to plan and develop consistent messages for increasing awareness, mobilisation and advocacy. 2. Organising and holding a pre-consultative meeting aimed at increasing the buy-in of the local and the national government, and of the target communities. 3. Holding preparatory consultative sustainability meetings aimed at transferring skills and increasing community ownership. 4. Engagement with the public and interactive media. 5. Organising awareness sessions and mass registration campaigns.Experience has shown that UBR serves as a cost effective and applicable tool for the attainment of child-focused development. It is also a suitable approach for building the foundations of long-term development interventions. In addition, UBR can contribute as a planning instrument during emergencies such as the outbreak of diseases like Ebola. It is also perhaps one of the few tools that possesses and promotes many of the coveted features of development:I n Sierra Leone, nearly 40% of births go unregistered, which exposes children later in life to challenges concerning attainment of their basic human rights and denial of their age-appropriate privileges and services. With this in mind and with the support of the Government of Sierra Leone and other nongovernmental organizations, Plan International has designed and implemented the project 'Promoting birth registration for children's' development and protection', geared towards addressing the vulnerability of unregistered children and young people in Sierra Leone and also in Liberia, two Mano River Union countries. The extent of the project's success has been monitored via facilitators to obtain information from the communities in which the project is working.The study focused on obtaining opinions, views and facts from the target communities on universal birth registration (UBR) as a tool to solve problems affecting children. The research team attempted to obtain such information objectively and without bias, given the project's purpose of influencing change through evidence.UBR involves the identification of a specific geographic area within which activities are conducted to ensure all children have been registered and issued birth certificates. UBR activities range from Plan International carried out a thorough study of the tool and of its implementation. This ran from April 2012 to February 2017, and was therefore halted during the Ebola outbreak of 2014-2015. The main stakeholders involved, whose views have been reflected in this work, included the Government of Sierra Leone, the United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF), Plan International, Plan Sierra Leone, many different civil society organizations, and also our implementing partners and other development agencies. Plan International's project manager and staff running the UBR were also interviewed, as well as staff from the birth and death department in Freetown. And additional information was also collected from the National Births and Deaths Registration Office.In short, the whole process considered:(a) A national workshop to plan and develop consistent messages for awareness, mobilisation and advocacy purposes. Plan International facilitated a two-day workshop to develop consistent messaging in partnership with the communication department of the Ministry of Health and Sanitation, the National Office of Births and Deaths, UNICEF, the National Registration Secretariat and the National Electoral Commission. Representatives of the National Commission for Human Rights, the Commission for Disability, the Office of National Security, the National Commission for Democracy, Children's Commission, traditional leaders, religious leaders and CSOs were also in attendance. Discussions at the meeting focused on the importance of birth registration, the problems associated with unregistered births, the procedures to be followed• Cross-cutting applicability: the tool can be used to target interventions in different development sectors (such as health, education, governance and human rights), and its benefits can solve problems across sectors and sub sectors.• Ease of applicability: it is easy to set up systems and structures for UBR, as long as there is an existing government structure in place for birth registration and stakeholder buy-in. Because of its simplicity (whether paper-based or biometric), an area with a population of up to 7 million can be targeted with birth registration activities within a week.• Quick wins: when UBR is employed, quick results can be realised, especially in protecting children from harm and providing appropriate services to them.• Big results: high impact in relation to protection and rights assurance solutions are likely. Registration of 95-100% of births within populations is likely when using the tool. In the external evaluation of different cases, registration increase of between 40 and 95% has been recorded.• Targeted interventions: the desire of development and humanitarian actors to correctly identify the status of target beneficiaries to correctly plan for and allocate resources (for example, in terms of enrolment in scholls), is easily enhanced through correct birth registration data. The benefits of correct planning and resource and intervention mapping cannot be overemphasised where projects with limited resources are concerned.• Collaborative action and working together: because the process of UBR involves many different activities, it encourages collaborative action and crediting of teams rather than a single entity or actor.Plan Sierra Leone, the local councils and other stakeholders identified the situation of unregistered births as:• A major impediment to successful implementation of child-focused age-appropriate interventions and provision of services in Sierra Leone;• A principal barrier to the success of improved access to justice by victims of abuse in various sectors and subsectors including sexual and gender based violence (SGBV), child battery, child neglect, child exploitation, and child labour;• A cause for outright denial of social and civic rights of individuals seeking to exercise such; important role in community mobilisation.As the most commonly accessed media channel, radio was the most important outlet for information dissemination. Plan Sierra Leone entered into an agreement with six national radio stations and four community radio stations to broadcast shows (one per month for six months in each district), which focused on the key issues of birth registration. Each show was broadcast at peak hours and lasted for 2 hours, allowing one hour for a panel discussion and one hour for questions and answers by text/phone-in.The panellists comprised of representatives from, for example, DHMT, the District Registrar from the National Office of Births and Deaths, religious and traditional leaders, and Plan Sierra Leone staff.Last, we also ran thirty-six awareness campaigns in Kailahun, Port Loko and Western Area (12 in each district). In some initiatives, comedians paraded through the streets of the target districts putting on live performances and encouraging parents to register their children for free.Our study considered different criteria to measure the success of the tool's implementation process:• Adoption: Some partners and agencies said limited funding restricted their ability to implement the project. Others said it was the responsibility of the government to provide UBR, which is why they didn't make it a priority.• Effectiveness: Project participants stated that although effective, the tool was unable to reach all unregistered children due to mistakes preventing all those involved from achieving their aims for child registration and the linkages to the newly established civil registration system.(b) Pre-implementation consultative meetings. These activities focused on establishing and strengthening links with existing influential community stakeholders, including traditional and religious leaders, women, youth and child representatives, and community chiefs to ensure successful implementation of the UBR activity, as well as mobilisation of community at large.(c) Preparatory consultative sustainability meetings. Three consultative meetings were held -one in Port Loko, one in the Western Area and one in Kailahun. A total of 120 participants attended these meetings; 40 participants from each district. Participants included representatives from the National Office of Births and Deaths, the District Health Management Team (DHMT), paramount chiefs, tribal heads, religious leaders, city mayors, women, youth and child organisation representatives, and community based organisations. In light of the Ebola emergency, the meetings discussed the following topics:• Linkages between birth registration and the spread of disease outbreaks: faster tracing of family ties could reduce or delay the spread of disease to relatives and community members;• The importance of avoiding a break in registration activities in the eventuality of disease outbreak;• The importance of encouraging community members to access health facilities and to trust front line health personnel.There was also a large sensitization effort (April -June 2017), where interactive media played anCollaborative action can promote adoption among parties with similar interests, which is why as many stakeholders as possible were included.(such as those related to the project design and to the limited availability of resources).• Increased access to services: With proof of age through using the tool, child participants have been able to vote, attend school and avoid early marriages. They have also been able access/receive age-targeted nutrition therapy, immunisations, counselling and appropriate treatment in court.• Time-effectiveness: The time efficacy of UBR can be undermined if the paper-based certificate lacks a photograph. The process of proving legitimacy of the document can then be time consuming.• Cost effectiveness: According to the births and deaths department, it costs less than US$1 to register a child. However, due to systemic problems within government structures, evaluators of the project reported the cost at just under US$4 for each child registered.• Project reach: Stakeholders interviewed reported that the UBR recorded about 400,000 people and that 87 percent of the communities in the target area were reached, and that the awareness campaigns greatly contributed to this.• Necessity in the context: The workers at the birth and death department, as well as other project partners, have said that the tool was more than necessary in the context of the country. Districts not served during the project now have comparatively fewer unregistered children.In general terms, we've seen that collaborative action can promote adoption among parties with similar interests, this is why during the consultative meetings, as many stakeholders as possible were included to ensure the decisions were equally owned. But it is also important to mention that, when planning a mass activity which involves many people, like this one, provisions should be made for cases where disasters restrict the movement of people.We have also seen that, however result-oriented a tool, universal application cannot easily be guaranteed in a context of weak systems. Therefore, whilst we aimed for 100% registration, underlying factors such as poor systems prevented our attainment of full registration.The births and deaths department recommends that NGOs and development actors prioritise birth registration at the start of a child's life in order to obtain accurate birth information, which becomes less accurate for children registered over the age of five. UBR should be encouraged by NGOs and mandated by governments. In areas suspected to have lower than 60% birth registration rates, mass awareness campaigns should be undertaken. Plan International should insist on the practice of UBR as a mainstream activity of every country office, especially in the countries where it works."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3796204121.json b/main/part_2/3796204121.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0060e88876b56261b27937dadc9e95179254d333 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3796204121.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2667bf514a68d7ad949bdf175950d835","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ec664cd7-e40b-445b-bb08-f4cd36e3c600/retrieve","id":"2078086568"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"dcd8ddd9-de5c-4660-b5fc-5669b5ce2653","content":"Background 2 03 The Dialogues 3 04 African Dialogues 4 05 Regional dialogue summary according to cross-cutting themes 6 Southern region (Botswana,Climate change is adversely affecting regional and national food systems contributing to low agricultural productivity and food insecurity;Countries are adopting diverse approaches to move towards environmentally sustainable production and consumption, but they require capacity building and financial resources for implementation;To improve trade and market access there is a need for improved infrastructure, the harmonisation of trade standards and better monitoring and dissemination of market information;Value chain development is constrained by a lack of access to processing equipment, technical knowledge, financial resources and disconnected value chain actors;High levels of food waste are attributed to poor handling, a lack of food processing and inadequate storage facilities (especially cold chains), poor road and rail infrastructure and limited access to markets;Health challenges include poor nutritional education and awareness, a lack of dietary diversity, inadequate food safety standards and policy, unaffordable nutritious whole foods and low levels of consumption of local/indigenous food products;Gender and social inclusion is recognised as essential to sustainable food systems but requires land tenure reform and improved access to inputs, including finances, by women, youth and vulnerable groups;Discussions on governance and policy highlight the naeed for the maintenance/development of supporting infrastructure, improved alignment of policy, revised land use policy and better coordination and collaboration between and amongst government departments/ ministries and other stakeholders;There is a need to enhance investment in demand-driven food systems research, and this can be achieved through private and public sector partnerships;Technology and innovation are key for knowledge sharing, enhancing agricultural productivity and the generation of agricultural data for evidence-based decision making; andCredit and loan facilities are largely inaccessible to food producers due to high interest rates.The United Nations Secretary-General called upon world leaders to take part in the Food Systems Summit to accelerate collective action for food systems transformation. This report synthesises the findings from the African Member States' Dialogues, held to shape national pathways towards sustainable food systems.In 2021, the United Nations (UN) Secretary-General convened a Food Systems Summit (the Summit) as part of the Decade of Action to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030. The Summit presented new actions to progress towards the seventeen SDGs, each of which relies to some extent on more sustainable and equitable food systems.The ongoing Food Systems Summit Dialogues (the Dialogues) provide a standardised approach for purposeful events that enable a diverse range of stakeholders to collaborate and share their experiences with the goal of transforming food systems to sustainably meet the current and future needs of the global population.The Dialogues follow a standardised approach involving the following:• Inclusion of diverse actors from across the entirety of food systems;• Adherence to the Summit's principles of engagement;• Discussions on the long-term visions for sustainable food systems;• Sharing of reflections, building on knowledge, experience and wisdom;• Reflection on the consensus and divergence of opinions amongst the stakeholders; and• Identification of priorities for action within the context of current realities.Multi-stakeholder dialogue allows multiple actors to congregate and apply their combined knowledge and experiences to address a problem. The discussions are stimulated and guided by facilitators so that the desired outcomes are shaped and articulated. The outcome is a thorough exploration of the issue at hand, the development of shared positions and the emergence of joint action.A wide range of stakeholder groups are required to take part in the multi-stakeholder dialogues, such as:• Representatives from the entire food value chain (e.g. food producers and processors, distributors and retailers, caterers, marketers, traders, consumers);• Health and nutrition professionals;• Private sector;• Community organisations;• Education and research institutions;• Vulnerable groups such as women, youth, indigenous peoples and migrants; and• Those who help to govern territories, protect livelihoods, foster resilience, regenerate ecosystems, participate in climate action and manage freshwater, coastlines, seas and the ocean.A successful multi-stakeholder dialogue event enables multiple stakeholders to connect, share ideas, understand each other's perspectives, develop propositions, examine their potential and nurture the shaping and emergence of pathways to sustainability.The Dialogues provide an environment conducive to open debate, collaboration, consensus-building and shared commitmentmaking and are designed to offer valuable insights for shaping pathways to equitable and sustainable food systems by 2030. Southern Africa is commonly referred to as a climate change 'hotspot' with drought and extreme rainfall events negatively impacting on the food systems of several countries.Mozambique is considered one of the worst affected African countries in terms of extreme climatic events and subsequently held a Dialogue focused on innovative solutions to climate change challenges. Climate change hazards were mentioned to have a devastating effect on the country's food systems by contributing to low agricultural productivity, an increasing occurrence of pests and diseases and a reduction in productive areas. Furthermore, stakeholders noted that climate hazards such as tropical cyclones have led to the destruction of infrastructure (e.g. irrigation systems, roads, warehouses, amongst others) thereby disrupting food value chains.Practices (GAPs), enhancing renewable energy generation, capacity building and improving water use management and land use planning. Botswana has adopted climate smart agriculture (CSA) and conservation agriculture practices and technologies to mitigate climate change, improve production and commercialise agriculture. However, it was noted that there is a need for scaling which requires adequate funding. The country has boosted aquaculture to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, such as methane from meat production. Botswana has also improved their water management through sustainable water use practices and enhanced wastewater management.In addition, Botswana focused on renewable energy production and has conducted research on renewable resources. Malawi has also investigated renewable energy generation through the identification of hydroelectric power opportunities along the Shire River.In terms of shifting to sustainable consumption patterns, Malawi has faced the following challenges:• Lack of a comprehensive definition of sustainable consumption;• Limited consumption of indigenous foods despite being highly nutritious;• High food waste and pollution;• Low dietary diversification;• Low accessibility to some food types in certain parts of the country; and• Increased post-harvest losses.In Zimbabwe, stakeholders indicated that a manual was produced on resilient and sustainable agriculture covering issues on agroecology and other naturepositive production mechanisms. The manual was funded by the Zimbabwe Resilience Building Fund and is to be translated into different local languages. In Masvingo, the Zimbabwe Smallholder Organic Farmers' Forum is implementing soil fertility management and water harvesting schemes. Efforts are also being made to establish a local seed bank.Southern region (Botswana, Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe)Proposed solutions from Mozambique's Dialogues included:• The construction of robust infrastructure using modern technologies that ensure greater durability and resilience;• Humanitarian assistance to displaced people, solidarity campaigns, resettlement, agricultural development and income generation projects for displaced and host families;• The establishment of food banks across the different regions; and• The identification and mapping of alternative production areas for affected people.Malawi, a neighbour of Mozambique, has also been adversely affected by climate changerelated hazards such as erratic rainfall patterns and an increase in natural disasters such as tropical cyclones. Stakeholders indicated that due to climatic factors and inadequate agricultural diversification, some regions are now better suited to the production of livestock.The South African Dialogues highlighted the need for improved Early Warning Systems (EWSs) to disseminate information to all members of society. Crisis management methods such as an adaptation strategy, action plan and anticipation protocol were mentioned as key.Mozambique also considered food system resilience to other shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated increased unemployment rate has resulted in lower purchasing power and a reduced demand for food. This, in turn, is resulting in food surpluses at the producer level, higher levels of postharvest losses and food insecurity and malnutrition.Community-level education on contingency planning and risk management was proposed to address the issue of shocks. Stakeholders also mentioned the challenges surrounding armed conflict in the country's central region and terrorist attacks in the north resulting in the abandonment of productive areas further contributing to food insecurity.Mozambique's Dialogues drew attention to the fact that different regions of the country are impacted differently by climate hazards and shocks and that the impacts vary according to the type of sector, i.e. crop, livestock or fisheries. This highlighted the need to manage and prepare for climate hazards at a more localised scale, e.g. provincial.The countries of the Southern region are implementing diverse approaches to move towards environmentally sustainable production and consumption such as by adopting Good AgriculturalIt was noted that land use planning aimed at reducing the overexploitation of natural resources is a key focal area in Mozambique, and in South Africa, former agricultural colleges have strengthened the capacity of local community-based centres of excellence to adopt sustainable agricultural practices.Countries in the Southern region highlighted a need for improved infrastructure to increase market access, the harmonisation of trade standards and better monitoring and dissemination of market information. Stakeholders indicated that the Northern region of Malawi has poor road infrastructure and a hilly topography that affects the accessibility and distribution of food supplies within the region. The country has experienced market failures including unregulated contract farming agreements, uncompetitive prices and dysfunctional and unstructured markets.In Zimbabwe, Knowledge Transfer Africa/ eMkambo is monitoring food-related market information. They are working with the Consumer Council of Zimbabwe (CCZ) and other stakeholders to issue weekly reports on the quality of food in specific markets.Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the African Growth and Opportunity Act, respectively. The country has installed new infrastructure (roads, electricity, water and market infrastructure) and improved communication networks in places of deficit.There is a focus on the creation of a transportation network that will ensure the timely delivery of food products and reduce wastage. It was noted that the Government, the private sector and farmers should be encouraged to collaborate to build food storage facilities in remote areas to reduce post-harvest losses. Furthermore, the Government is working to secure a market for local producers with healthy market competition. Mozambique also identified the need for nutritional awareness programmes using the media and food guides.In the South African Dialogues, other potential means for improving nutritional intake included improved dietary data, school feeding programmes, the incorporation of nutritional education in school curricula, the diversification of food production for more balanced diets, improved processing, fortification/enrichment methods and modern food storage practices.The Botswanan Dialogues indicated an improved use of agrochemicals and the promotion of organic farming through ongoing public education. South Africa, Malawi and Zimbabwe highlighted the issue of food waste in their Dialogues.Malawi recognised a food deficit due to poor handling and storage, inadequate budgeting, post-harvest losses and wastage.Cultural celebrations such as weddings and funeral ceremonies were also considered major contributing factors to the country's food waste. In South Africa, food wastage and loss are deemed prevalent in both the production cycle and during consumption. In Zimbabwe, investment in post-harvest infrastructure and value addition was recognised as essential for reducing food waste and loss in informal markets.In the Southern region, common health and nutrition challenges included poor nutritional education and awareness, a lack of dietary diversity, inadequate food safety standards and policy, unaffordability of nutritious foods and low levels of consumption of indigenous food products.Stakeholders in Malawi recognised that the country's food safety challenges were mainly due to a lack of national-level food safety policies, standards and regulations with limited coordination across the sectors on food security, nutrition and food safety (there is no delivery mechanism to enable this). A lack of diversity in local diets, which are dominated by the consumption of maize, was also noted. Stakeholders in both Malawi and South Africa noted that nutritious foods are too expensive.Like Malawi, in Zimbabwe, the Dialogues discussed a need for improved food safety through legislation, i.e. a Food Safety Act, and this is the responsibility of the Ministry of Health and Child Care. It was indicated that the Government of Zimbabwe and partners need to promote and enforce food safety standards in both formal and informal food markets to protect consumers.example, discussions in South Africa mentioned a need for enhanced collaboration with neighbouring countries to ensure a coordinated approach to trade, especially in the face of the recently ratified AfCFTA.Key challenges faced in establishing sustainable value chains in the Southern region included a lack of processing equipment and financial resources for value addition and the need to link value chain actors as well as producers with markets.The Botswanan Dialogues also indicated a need to increase resources and the skills base of agriculture extension officers. Furthermore, transaction costs along value chains need to be reduced to offer consumers better food prices.to drive processing and value addition and that there is a need for food processing equipment.Mozambique recognised that their food value chains are fragmented; and the South African Dialogues discussed the inclusivity of their food value chains and the need to incorporate smallholder and subsistence farmers.Actions proposed to strengthen food value chains in South Africa included:• Mobilise investments in infrastructure and services as well as human and material resources to develop value chains that support sustainable end markets;• Build data on food value chain actors, their profiles, locations, needs and actions; Governance and policy improvements for sustainable food systems varied by country.However, common needs included the maintenance and development of supporting infrastructure, improved alignment of policy, revised land use policy, and better coordination and collaboration between and amongst government departments/ministries and other stakeholders (e.g. non-governmental organisations (NGOs), finance institutions and civil society).In Botswana, stakeholders identified the need to review the National Land Policy to make fertile land available for the youth and to centralise food standards at the Botswana Bureau of Standards for all sectors. A holistic review of policies is needed to align them with international obligations that support sustainable agriculture and food systems. The country further recognised the need for an inclusive approach to the development of policies i.e. from the bottom up.In Malawi, regulatory services are being strengthened and capacity building is taking place in key ministries such as the Ministries of Health, Agriculture and Trade as well as district councils, community structures and institutions such as the Malawi Bureau of Standards.In Zimbabwe, stakeholders highlighted the need to address inadequate environmental governance and impose strict penalties on people who start bushfires for clearing land.In the Mozambiquan Dialogues, the inclusion of Provincial Directorates of Agriculture and Fisheries in policy development was mentioned as key to sustainable food systems. It was noted thatBotswana, Malawi, South Africa and Mozambique have made efforts towards improving their inclusivity both within the Dialogue process and in food systems.For example, Botswana has introduced inclusive policies to improve:• Access to funding and land for production;• Support for the elderly in food systems; and• Mentorship programmes for the youth.Botswana has also installed infrastructure in rural areas to enable people with disabilities to lead active lives and gender equity has been introduced in the allocation of programmes for commercialisation with youth now able to access financing.In Malawi, it was recognised that gender inequalities persist in accessing safe and healthy food products. Stakeholders discussed women and youth marginalisation in agri-food systems, which was attributed to a lack of access to land and resources which are traditionally controlled by men. Women and youth also have limited access to financial opportunities, due to the structural barriers associated with smallholder farmers' access to finances. The limited livelihood opportunities are forcing youth to migrate to South Africa which is resulting in labour shortages in some Malawian districts.South Africa ensured the inclusion of subsistence and smallholder farmers in the engagements for food system transformation;this involved interpretation in 11 local languages. Over 1,000 farmers discussed, in their own languages, the major challenges they faced such as gaining access to land, water and energy. As the engagements were held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic, extensionists and government officials used their laptops to convene farmers who did not have access to internet.incentives are to be provided for locally produced inputs (e.g. fish feed) and focus is placed on processing at both artisanal and industrial scales. In addition, it was recognised that supporting infrastructure (e.g. irrigation channels and road networks) coverage and improvement/rehabilitation is needed.The South African Dialogues discussed the need for coordination across government departments and the inclusion of municipalities, NGOs, finance institutions and other formations of civil society. A central coordination structure is required to monitor all food system elements and avoid the duplication of programmes aimed at fighting hunger. Clear legislative and regulatory guidelines are also needed to ensure the active participation of smallholders.Suggested actions from the South African Dialogues included:• The maintenance and development of infrastructure, particularly related to water, electricity, roads, rail and ports;• Comprehensive farmer support services, including mentorship, extension services and agricultural colleges;• Effective land reform and tenure security in conjunction with rural safety;• The revision of curricula to include food systems, indigenous knowledge, food security, food safety and nutrition, and to stimulate research in these areas;• Revisiting, evaluating and up-scaling food security programmes;• Re-educating agricultural practitioners and agro-processors with regards to sustainable practices; and• Policy considerations for digital agriculture, embracing the fourth industrial revolution (4IR), advanced technologies and big data to expand smart farming practices.• There is a need for research in Malawi, as there is a deficit in data and evidence required by policy makers and the private sector to understand the landscape better.• In Zimbabwe, academia, the Zimbabwe Nutrition Association (ZimNA), eMkambo and other stakeholders are willing to engage and research food systems and food consumption.• The South African Dialogues highlighted the importance of researching organic agriculture and indigenous food production, with a focus on heat-and droughttolerant varieties and improved nutritional content.The importance of PPPs for investment, training and knowledge sharing was frequently highlighted in the Dialogues. Botswana has strengthened PPPs, which has improved investment across their value chains. In Zimbabwe, it was mentioned that the Government needs to partner with relevant stakeholders to incentivise smallholder farmers for growing healthy foods. In South Africa, emphasis was placed on partnerships for equality. In Malawi, the Dialogues explored stakeholder engagement for collective action in transforming food systems. It was noted that there are several partners working in the food systems, including NGOs (local and international), faith-based organisations, farmer organisations and cooperatives, government departments, private sector players, amongst other, but they rarely work together to share lessons learnt and best practices. The lack of collaboration was attributed to poor coordination at the regional and district levels, including between ministries, departments and agencies of the Government, despite the decentralised governance system. Opportunities, enablers and recommendations to transform food systems are multi-sectoral in nature and so require a coordinated approach at the regional and district level to be impactful.The Dialogues of four countries emphasised the importance of agricultural and food system research:• In Botswana, the apiculture and aquaculture sectors need to be commercialised and farmers require funding, training and stock (bees and fish). To expand entrepreneurship in these sectors, research is needed as well as the development of appropriate agro-food technologies.Digital technology developments were recognised by Botswana, Mozambique, Malawi and South Africa as important for food system transformation.Botswana has implemented food processing technologies for indigenous products.In Malawi, the development of a digital technology strategy was highlighted as important for communication as well as enhancing agricultural productivity e.g. through adopting agricultural technologies such as CSA, conservation agriculture, permaculture, intercropping, agroforestry, and land and water conservation measures.Mozambique's Dialogues also emphasised the importance of technology for communication in real-time, particularly in the case of warning mechanisms for extreme weather events. In South Africa digital technology was recognised as key for providing data to municipalities on food needs and prices as well as supply chain efficiencies. It was noted that communication technologies can also be used to distribute food amongst users and create awareness on food waste. AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 13 12 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processIn Malawi, the Affordable Input Programme proved contentious. Despite the country experiencing its highest yields in the last five years some stakeholders felt that the programme is an outdated social protection instrument that could be improved through diversification away from maize to other crops such as legumes and livestock. It was suggested that in the Southern region, because of the frequent occurrence of natural disasters, communities are getting used to receiving aid. For example, communities in Chikwawa district are affected by floods every year but are not willing to relocate to other areas. Some stakeholders suggested that the programme contributes to an increased dependence on the Government.In Mozambique, concerns were raised over the establishment of food reserves by the Government. It was argued that the purchasing of agricultural products, their storage and distribution to vulnerable groups will come at a great expense considering the current availability of storage facilities and maintenance requirements.In Zimbabwe, trans-fat, sugar and salt taxation was a contentious issue. It was stated that the taxes could create more problems than solutions and may not even change consumption patterns.In South Africa, stakeholders highlighted the lack of a clear food production and consumption mandate, noting that responsibilities are split between different departments and at different levels of the governance system. There is no coordination and alignment of services and a lot of information is lost. Furthermore, the inexplicit mandate at the local level makes the allocation of financial and human resources difficult for municipalities. The need for sustainable production systems such as agro-ecology and permaculture was discussed in the Malawian Dialogues. It was noted that the current food production system is near collapse as although conventional farming practices yield large amounts of produce, they utilise resources at an unsustainable rate. It was concluded that there is a need to incorporate both approaches.In Mozambique, environmental sustainability was identified as a major point of divergence as increased production and productivity is required to develop domestic industry, but an increased use of agrochemicals is damaging to the environment. It was concluded that a cost-benefit analysis is needed to assess the damaging effects of agrochemicals and it was suggested that the taxes applied to agrochemicals could be used for environmental restoration projects.In South Africa's Dialogues, it was noted that the agro-ecological approach has not been fully optimised. Whilst land needs to be made available for farming, people also need to be taught sustainable land management practices, as land rehabilitation and restoration is costly.In Malawi's Dialogues, mention was made of the need to embrace and consume indigenous food varieties as a major source of nutrition. The promoters of the indigenous food varieties emphasised that such foods have a high nutritional status and are resilient to climate change, on the contrary those championing improved varieties accentuated the high yielding and drought resistant varieties of maize.In Malawi, pesticide use in the Southern region was questioned, as there has been an increased use of pesticides due to the infestation of fall armyworm and increased cultivation of horticultural crops. Participants noted that if the pesticides are not handled and used properly, they can be fatal. For instance, the withdrawal periods on vegetables need to be strictly adhered to for safe consumption.In South Africa, it was mentioned that food system discussions are not inclusive and there is a lack of understanding on the topic due to poor knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, a lack of information on the informal sector hinders food system transformation and resilience.In the Eastern region of Malawi, contradictory discussions took place on the benefits of fishing as a major source of income in the region. Some stakeholders argued that an overreliance on fishing affects crop production as men do not have time to tend to their crops, thereby reducing dietary diversification. Another area of divergence in Malawi's Dialogues was the attraction of tourists to Liwonde National Park. It was argued that tourism positively impacts the district's economy and offers employment to young people. However, other stakeholders said that the tourists bring diseases. • Promoting the use of renewable energy;• Adopting farming practices that prevent land degradation;• Further promoting agroforestry;• Adopting integrated management of pests and diseases;• Ensuring water/irrigation efficiency; and• Promoting soil health management.Eastern region (Comoros, Kenya Mauritius, Madagascar, Rwanda, Seychelles, Sudan)In the Sudanese Dialogues, stakeholders agreed on the need for nature-positive production but highlighted the lack of appropriate policies and legislation. Large areas of land are available for organic farming, but farmers require financial resources and know-how.With regards to trade and market access, the countries from the Eastern region focused on market access for small-scale producers, competition with imported products and a need for capacity building on trade standards.The Kenyan, Rwandan and Mauritian Dialogues discussed the need to enhance market access for small-scale producers. In Mauritius, stakeholders highlighted the need for capacity building of agro processors to meet food safety standards and to be able to compete with imported produce. It was suggested that there should be a dedicated space in shopping malls and other retail outlets for locally processed food items.Competition with food imports was also noted as an issue in the Seychelles. The local market is highly competitive due to the adoption of the fair, free and open market policy and the limited capacity of farmers to exploit economies of scale due to the small size of their farms (average farm size is 8,000 sqm). Producers indicated that global food trade is likely to limit local food production systems as they cannot compete with the prices of imported goods. Local produce is further inaccessible due to poor distribution networks and low levels of organisation of the local food production system.Rwanda highlighted a lack of awareness of regional compliance standards amongst stakeholders and significant gaps in trade standards between East African countries. It was suggested that small and medium-sized enterprises undergo capacity building on trade standards.Food loss and waste was mentioned in the Dialogues of Rwanda, Sudan and Mauritius. In Rwanda, stakeholders mentioned the need for warehouses and other storage infrastructure for times of surplus. In Sudan, it was argued that issues surrounding consumption and food loss are due to culture. In Mauritius, food loss and food waste were a major concern, and the development of postharvest processing was seen as key to improving shelf life, marketability and reducing postharvest losses. Support is being provided to agro-entrepreneurs in the development of value-added products from local fruits and vegetables such as gluten-free breadfruit and cassava flour, ginger paste, turmeric paste, lime paste, guava fruit paste, dehydrated papaya and fruit paste sorbet.Stakeholders from Rwanda and Sudan understood the importance of environmentally sustainable food production, but development was hindered by barriers such as a lack of suitable policies and legislation, inadequate knowledge on sustainable land management practices and a need for financial resources.Stakeholders in Rwanda's Dialogues discussed the limited adoption of CSA practices and technologies despite the prevalence of soil degradation due to agricultural malpractices. It was noted that inadequate knowledge on the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides is causing soil and water pollution and is negatively impacting pollinators.• Promote tailored ecosystem-based approaches for smaller scales of production (e.g. micro-agriculture, urban agriculture and landless agriculture);• Promote the recovery and reuse of organic waste to restore soil fertility;• Appropriately manage the application of inorganic fertilisers to reduce GHG emissions;• Enhance awareness on the importance of maintaining ecosystems and biodiversity at the local level;• Scale up initiatives to restore/rehabilitate degraded ecosystems and promote indigenous species in agroforestry and landscape restoration in high-risk areas; and• Protect biodiversity through awareness trainings at the community level.In the Seychelles, stakeholders discussed the gaps in value and supply chains such as sourcing difficulties, access to technology, limited farm workers in the local market, regional temperature-controlled storage facilities, demand and supply management platforms as well as inadequate services from support institutions. The Mauritian Dialogues indicated a lack of adequate processing, storage and distribution facilities. Similarly, the Rwandan Dialogues made mention of a need for increased investment in food distribution channels (including cold chains), markets, post-harvest handling and processing.• Mobilising investments in infrastructure and services as well as human and material resources to develop value chains that support sustainable end markets;• Building data on actors in food value chains, their profiles, locations, needs and actions given the risks;• Strengthening PPPs by promoting mechanisms for coordination; and• Recognition of informal markets and value chains as important components of the food system.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 19 18 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processIn Sudan, policy on food security exists but the implementation of the action plan requires the mobilisation of resources.Furthermore, stakeholders agreed that food security policy and legislation need to be developed with a focus on prices which form the main barrier to accessing nutritious food.The Rwandan Dialogues focused on land use planning and the introduction of commercial farming through the implementation of the Land Use and Development Master Plan, 2050. Discussions were also held on increasing the reach of extension services to smallholder farmers, the promotion of small livestock husbandry and the lack of a coordinated multi-sectoral approach for promoting CSA practices. It was mentioned that CSA practices could be incentivised through subsidies and tax breaks as well as by creating stronger partnerships with institutions such as the Rwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture. Enhanced inter-ministerial coordination amongst the different sectors to determine the trade-offs between agriculture and the environment was highlighted as well as the need to strengthen policy coherence and implementation. Rwanda also put in place legislative frameworks to promote healthy diets and policies to reduce food waste at all levels. Coordination mechanisms were established at both national and local levels.Kenya's Dialogues focused on partnerships to enable small-scale farmers to access credit, training and to boost innovation to enhance self-sufficiency and reduce dependency.Intergovernmental collaboration, the control of imports, and policy coherence and implementation were identified as common challenges to food system governance amongst the Eastern region's countries.In the Seychelles, stakeholders indicated a need for better coordination and action to implement and drive agricultural and food system-related policy decisions. The benefits of elevating key policy objectives and strategic choices in the form of a legal instrument were debated at length. There was bipartisan alignment and agreement in favour of the proposal to draft a Food Security Bill to ensure policy continuity. Furthermore, there was general agreement that sector activities should be taxed but according to a different taxation regime.The Comoros Dialogues focused on improving livestock health through improved control of imported animals at borders. Mauritius addressed animal product importation policies that are disadvantageous to local farmers.In Kenya, it was noted that major discrepancies exist between the national and county functions with agriculture being a devolved function and policy making still the responsibility of the national government. Policy needs to be coherent and the overlapping roles and division of policy making responsibility between the two levels of government needs to be clarified. Furthermore, within the counties, there is a lack of alignment in agricultural policies. Intergovernmental cooperation, institutional coordination, public participation and stakeholder involvement is required. Kenya is also working to develop legislation and policy frameworks to anchor pastoralism as a component of sustainable food systems as well as strengthen the policy environment to enhance and protect agricultural land in the Central Region Economic Bloc.Gender and social inclusivity was a major topic in the Dialogues with focus placed on women and youth inclusion. In Mauritius, the need for training and awareness of producers on GAPs was identified with special mention made of the inclusion of vulnerable groups. It was also noted that youth need to be better integrated into agriculture by providing free training.In Rwanda and Sudan, stakeholders discussed the role of youth and women in achieving sustainable, equitable and resilient food systems. The Mauritius, Rwandan and Madagascan Dialogues all highlighted the important role of the private sector in achieving inclusivity, and the need for improved coordination between parties. Madagascar's Dialogues focused on empowering women in food systems and strengthening the commitment of the private sector and civil society to support family farms and farmers' organisations.The Kenya Youth in Agriculture Strategy includes robust measures to meaningfully engage young people in agriculture. In SEKEB, it was noted that agroprocessing and value-addition initiatives can be used to enhance the capacity and skills of young people as well as provide meaningful employment for them. It was noted that to leverage such opportunities, the vulnerable groups require ownership rights and access to productive resources such as land, finance, digital agriculture and technological solutions, training and access to data and information.The Rwandan Dialogues also identified barriers around creating employment for marginalised groups and the following actions were proposed:• Establish appropriate credit funds to address the limited access to finance for small-scale entrepreneurs and marginalised groups; and• Promote inclusive consultation processes and participatory assessments of land degradation for the design of effective ecosystem restoration strategies.Nutritional education, food safety awareness campaigns, improved food safety standards and enhanced local production were identified as key action areas by stakeholders in Mauritius and the Seychelles. The Mauritian food safety standards are to be reviewed and slaughterhouses relocated. Stakeholders noted a need for training, support from authorities and incentives to boost the sector. Consumers are encouraged to eat locally produced foods (e.g. cassava, potato, breadfruit, eddoes) and to undertake their own production such as roof gardening and urban agriculture.In the Seychelles, education is needed on the nutritional value of whole locally produced food, particularly as fast food consumption is increasing to the extent that it is a default option for lunch in most schools, and in many food outlets. Stakeholders indicated that there has been limited to no investment in promoting local farm produce and very few campaigns to address fast food advertising. Without action it is expected that fast food consumption will increase along with associated dietary problems.To increase local food productionin the Seychelles it was suggested to:• Increase investment in turnkey farms and allocate them to young farmers;• Establish an innovation fund; and• Revise legislation and submit the food system transformation policy and strategy to the National Assembly for final discussion, alignment and consolidation by mid-October 2021. • Enable more reliable access to usable and shareable data; and• Conduct quality analyses to support evidencebased decisions on performance management, M&E, research and policy.It was also noted in Kenya's Dialogues that access to ICTs in both urban and rural areas is growing rapidly, but progress is unequal both geographically and socioeconomically. For example, in many areas women and youth have less access to smartphones and digital services. In SEKEB, it was determined that investment is needed in innovation and technology such as irrigation, the use of digital agriculture tools in extension services and managing post-harvest losses through food processing technologies.The Rwandan Dialogues also focused on the modernisation of agriculture and the need to strengthen ICT. Special mention was made of the need to:• Leverage innovative technologies, such as satellite/drone technologies, to enhance data systems linked to agricultural insurance;• Adopt technologies that improve yields whilst reducing GHG emissions and land degradation; and• Use labour-saving technologies along the whole value chain.The The focus of discussions on technology and innovation were on the importance of agricultural data for evidence-based decision making and the need to strengthen and improve access to ICT.The Comoros Dialogues discussed the importance of strengthening advocacy and the need for government, together with other technical and financial partners, to mobilise funds to support technological innovations and the modernisation of agriculture and fishing. In Kenya, the SEKEB Dialogues mentioned the need for private sector investments and financing tools to de-risk food systems in the ASAL counties. It was further noted that the creation of an SEKEB Bank could boost the interest of young people in agri-businesses by providing access to much needed capital.Similar to the Seychelles, Rwanda emphasised the need for financial services at affordable interest rates. Stakeholders mentioned that farmers' cooperatives and organisations could be used to increase awareness on good agricultural extension and advisory services as well as to establish a commercial/agricultural bank. A need for banks to provide financial literacy programmes and insurance services was also highlighted. Stakeholders indicated that current subsidy programmes are inadequate for building short-term resilience in smallholder farmers and there is a lack of funds for innovative initiatives for improving ecosystems and biodiversity.The Mauritian Dialogues indicated a need for investment to modernise farming practices and stakeholders. In Sudan, stakeholders noted a need for investment in infrastructure in both the agriculture and industry sectors with special mention made of the need to finance smallholder farmers.In the Rwandan Dialogues, stakeholders disagreed on the percentage of insurance premiums that should be paid for by the Government. It was mentioned that in some parts of India, 80%-90% was required to attract interest compared with only 40% in Rwanda. Others noted that this was not feasible in Rwanda and that emphasis should instead be placed on integrating crop insurance into existing social protection programmes.In Mauritius, the granting of import permits for vegetables that are produced locally proved to be an area of contention for stakeholders.In Rwanda, there were disagreements on the role that insurance companies should play with some arguing that they were not doing enough whilst others indicated that the issue lies in farmers' lack of trust in the companies. This fed into a larger discussion on PPPs and the balance that must be found between business interests and social protection.There was some divergence over the promotion of biodiversity in the Rwandan Dialogues, as well as the use of more nutritious and drought-resistant crop species. In Madagascar, some stakeholders insisted on the urgency of adapting existing techniques to address climate change challenges whilst others stressed the need to carry out in-depth studies on the actions to be implemented and the need to transfer knowledge to the primary players concerned.In the Rwandan Dialogues, the use of technology to disseminate EWS information was mentioned as a possible 'game changing' solution, however, there was divergence on how to make it user-friendly and accessible. The successful case study highlighted a smartphone application developed by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations. The application provided weather information to improve farmers' decision making. However, it was argued that such an approach may not work in Rwanda as not all farmers, particularly the most vulnerable, have access to a smartphone. Simple SMS messages were suggested as an alternative solution, but the effectiveness of transmitting complex information in such a limiting format is likely to prove challenging.Rwandan stakeholders argued on the importance of harmonising trade standards across East Africa and raising the awareness of smallholder farmers to regional standards. It was noted that some countries, such as Kenya, have higher standards than their neighbours. The consultation of experts on issues related to policies, food safety regulations and post-harvest handling to harmonise policy was suggested. Others noted that while differences in standards exist, there are legal and economic frameworks in place, notably the East African Community trade forum, to address trade disputes in the interests of vulnerable stakeholders. It was deduced that raising farmers' awareness of standards is key so that they can export to other markets competitively.The countries of the Western region discussed the climate hazards they faced and the resulting impacts on both natural and human systems. Conflict was identified as another driver adversely impacting upon food production in the region.The Ghanaian Dialogues highlighted reduced yields due to water scarcity in the dry season and flooding in the rainfall season. A continuous decline in soil fertility was also noted. The need for improved and localised irrigation systems was emphasised, as rain-fed agriculture can no longer sustain the levels of food production needed.Nigerian stakeholders noted that the food system experiences shocks and stresses such as flooding, soil erosion and conflict. Poverty, unemployment and insufficient food reserves were recognised to further increase the vulnerability of local food systems. Areas to the south-east of the country have been affected by insecurity due to farmer-herder conflict, which has led to the destruction of crops, forced migration, death and forms of sexual violence. The Dialogues highlighted the need for social protection mechanisms and agricultural insurance.In the event of shocks affecting smallholder farmers in Sierra Leone, it was recognised that the Government and partners should establish seed banks to support farmers in reviving their activities. The seed banks were also noted as being important for preventing the loss of crop varieties and certain species of animals.It was noted in the Western region's Dialogues that environmental degradation and pollution due to human activities is already prevalent and adversely affecting food systems. It was suggested that rebates be issued to producers who adopt sustainable land management practices and policy be revised, especially in relation to land tenure and use.The Gambian Dialogues emphasised the considerable degradation of the country's resource base over the years. This was attributed to deforestation, overfishing, inappropriate fishing nets, the poisoning of marine life, land degradation Western region (Benin, Burkina Faso, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Nigeria)AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 25 24 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processThe Western region is working towards sustainable food value chains, common areas for improvement included an increased access to good quality inputs (especially seeds), enhanced mechanisation to maximise production and the establishment of processing facilities to reduce postharvest losses.In Sierra Leone's Dialogues, the high cost of agricultural inputs (particularly agro-chemicals) was highlighted, as well as the need for improved regulation. Special mention was made of the need for affordable quality seeds, with a preference for input dealers not only at the chiefdom level but at the district level.In Nigeria, stakeholders indicated a need for value chain and development financing by the Central Bank of Nigeria to increase food accessibility and safety. The need for mechanisation in all value chain activities was mentioned as key to enhancing efficiencies, improving productivity and encouraging youth inclusion. It was also noted that Nigerian food systems could be enhanced, and food safety improved, through the provision of high-quality inputs, the adoption of good agronomy practices and the management of postharvest activities.In Niger, stakeholders indicated that legume, fruit and vegetable value chains are weak.Processing was noted as inadequate, forming the weakest link of the value chain and resulting in postharvest/post-production losses. Major investments are deemed necessary to strengthen food value chain links and improve food preservation, e.g. through cold chains. Milk collection and processing units need to be created and promoted in each region. The millet value chain is limited by the unavailability of suitable seeds, soil degradation, poor access to agricultural inputs and low levels of mechanisation. Vegetable value chains, particularly for tomatoes, are also affected by poor access to suitable seeds. The fish value chain was noted as having great potential but needs to be strengthened with the development of inland aquaculture, which could be achieved by popularising national fisheries policy.A lack of access to food processing facilities was also highlighted in the Ghanaian Dialogues.In Ghana, Sierra Leone, Nigeria and Niger, stakeholders mentioned that poor road networks (and rail in Nigeria) limit market access and contribute to post-harvest losses. Additionally, the need for appropriate transport such as refrigerated trucks for perishable products and other cold chain components was noted by stakeholders in Niger's Dialogues.Stakeholders in Ghana identified the need for vulnerable small-scale farmers to be protected from the importation of foreign goods and Sierra Leone's Dialogues discussed the need for a robust commodity market system to ensure price stability. and frequent bushfires. Some of the adaptive measures undertaken to mitigate the degradation include sensitisation on bushfire control measures, agroforestry, regulated fishing and fishing nets and the creation of appropriate policies. It was further noted that poor agricultural practices on slopes have contributed to soil erosion leading to a loss of topsoil and a subsequent decline in soil fertility.In Ghana's Dialogues, focus was placed on cocoa which is a major cash crop in the Ashanti region and a key source of income for farmers.Cocoyam was noted as an important indigenous crop, but production levels keep dropping due to the use of herbicides on cocoa farms. In addition, it was indicated that local fishermen use a lot of chemicals in their fishing activities and this, coupled with other factors, has caused a decline in fish stocks.• Improving the productivity of small-scale farmers in a climate-smart and nutritionsensitive way;• Adopting improved farming practices to increase food production and productivity;• Promoting practices that prevent a loss of indigenous and traditional foods and promote the natural regeneration of trees; and• Avoiding destructive farming activities that degrade natural resources such as the uncontrolled use of agrochemicals.Senegal's Dialogues highlighted a drive for local consumption and key areas for improvement included the construction of cold rooms, enhanced processing of local products and improved marketing. To ensure the resilience and sustainability of food systems it was proposed that a rebate be paid to companies for actions to preserve the environment. It was also noted that water management needs to be promoted, particularly rainwater harvesting, to allow for out of season production.In Nigeria's Dialogues, key actions given by stakeholders for protecting the environment included:• Promoting the use of organic fertilisers;• Appropriate use and management of herbicides and pesticides;• Enforcement of existing laws and regulations to prevent further environmental degradation;• Protection of ecosystems against agricultural expansion;• Efficient recycling of waste;• Use of cover crops to reduce soil degradation and erosion;• Investing in the development of improved crop varieties for higher yields and improved attributes including biofortification;• Facilitating the sustainable management of food production systems to benefit the environment and people through GAPs;• Restoring degraded ecosystems and rehabilitating the soil for sustainable food production through renewed afforestation efforts; and• Scaling up the use of organic soil practices, crop rotation and intercropping.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 27 26 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processIn Gambia's Dialogues it was noted that a lack of access to quality health services in rural areas has led to high under five, infant and neo-natal mortalities.In Sierra Leone's Dialogues it was noted that there is a lack of food reserves, highlighting the need for formation of food banks, the provision of improved storage facilities and the manufacturing of key foods for improved preservation.In Ghana, there are no standards for regulating produce especially those for local markets. Food safety standards and labelling need improvement by following guidelines such as the Codex Alimentarius. The Ghanaian dialogues also mentioned the improper use of agrochemicals in farming, processing and retail and the need for adherence to safe practices. With respect to consumption, there is no screening for food vendors on diseases such as typhoid, which puts consumers at high risk. Furthermore, there is a lack of education and low nutritional literacy amongst the population. Ghanaian stakeholders also described an absence of food-based dietary guidelines, a lack of nutritional standards and the unaffordability of nutritious food. A need for recognition of the value of healthy indigenous foods and a return to their consumption was further highlighted.In Sierra Leone, poor dietary diversity is a major concern for both children and adults and proposed actions included improved nutrition education and scaling up sensitisation on the country's Food-Based Dietary Guideline for Healthy Eating. It was identified that the health system is weak, and health system strengthening can assist in improving the health status especially of women and children under the age of five years.The Nigerian Dialogues focused on the adoption of healthy diets through the production and availability of healthy and safe foods. To ensure agricultural systems produce good quality and nutritionally adequate food, stakeholders recommended the promotion of the use of high yielding crop varieties and livestock breeds to increase productivity and subsidies for Stakeholders in Ghana recognised the need to strengthen their fragmented food value chains, with actions such as:• Mobilising investments in infrastructure and services as well as human and material resources to develop value chains supporting sustainable end markets;• Building data on actors in food value chains, their profiles, locations, needs and actions given the risks;• Strengthening PPPs by promoting mechanisms for coordination; and• Recognising informal markets and value chains as important components of the food system.The Western region's food waste was largely attributed to a lack of storage facilities, limited food processing and poor food handling. In Nigeria, stakeholders discussed the reduction of food loss and waste through innovative food storage and processing methods from the point of harvest to the point of consumption. The rehabilitation of, and use of, silos in each Local Government Area was suggested. In addition, to reduce environmental impacts and health and safety it was suggested that the recycling of food waste products be improved.Stakeholders in Ghana described the need for warehouses and other storage infrastructure in times of surplus. Key areas of discussion included hermetic bags to reduce post-harvest losses of cereals and legumes and healthy food processing techniques to increase the shelf life of locally produced agricultural commodities. In Sierra Leone, stakeholders suggested that the Government improve access to affordable electricity supply to reduce food waste, particularly in urban areas. farmers. To enhance consumption of nutritious, safe, and diverse foods, stakeholders suggested a nutrition awareness programme to assist consumers in making healthy food choices against the dangers of contaminated food either through harmful chemicals, poor processing methods, or poor health and safety practices. It was also indicated that nutritional education in schools, hospitals and marketplaces needs to be strengthened.The Western region recognised the important role that women play in food systems, despite their unequal opportunities (e.g. access to land, financial resources and information), and the need to empower them for transformational change. In addition, stakeholders from Ghana and Nigeria highlighted the need to attract youth to food systems through improved technology.In the Gambian Dialogues, stakeholders indicated that women form more than 50% of the farming population and in some regions they are the main producers of vegetables, rice and groundnuts. However, despite their contributions, they are disadvantaged by a lack of access to key production components and inputs, particularly land, financial resources and technical know-how. It was noted that due to cultural norms and traditions, women in Gambia typically do not own land and so do not have collateral to obtain bank loans.In the Ghanaian Dialogues, women's access to credit was identified as a key challenge in the agricultural sector. There is also a lack of access to gender-sensitive equipment especially for small-scale processing. Furthermore, food production is currently unattractive to the youth who are not replacing the aging farmer population. Suggested actions to address this included the deployment of mobile agricultural extension services and digitisation. It was also recommended that the Government purchase/ subsidise land for agricultural purposes and engage traditional landholders to address land tenure challenges for easier access by women and youth.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 29 28 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processThe following actions were suggested for improving gender and social inclusion in Nigerian food systems:• Encouraging and supporting the establishment and functioning of cooperative societies for women and other vulnerable groups;• Promoting the 'Village Savings Association Model' to facilitate access to credit, inputs, and trainings;• Providing access to land for cultivation by vulnerable groups at the community level;• Addressing social norms and practices that systematically provide privileges to some groups over others;• Eliminating access barriers to markets, and social exclusion for vulnerable groups;• Ensuring social protection schemes reach the intended beneficiaries;• Promoting the use of clean energy; and• Identifying alternative sources of funding for interventions, other than government.In Sierra Leone, it was also noted that women play an important role in food production and have unequal access to agricultural inputs. As was mentioned by Ghanian stakeholders, there is a need for gender-friendly processing tools and equipment. Furthermore, there is a need for the inclusion of women in policy formulation and implementation along the food system chain and linkages.The Nigerian Dialogues highlighted the importance of including youth in the agricultural sector using technology and e-commerce.Nigerian stakeholders noted that over 60% of the farmers in the south-east are women, and that they have unequal access to productive resources. It was recommended that the south-east develop and implement Social Investment Programmes that take vulnerable groups into consideration. Improving women farmers' access to land was seen as a key means for enhancing food production and security. Women groups should be created and encouraged to participate in food system decision-making.In Gambia, the effective coordination of relevant policies on food systems was highlighted as a major issue in the attainment of the SDGs by 2030. Existing policies need to be reviewed and aligned ensuring equity, justice, empowerment and sustainability for all. It was noted that the Government needs to honour its commitments to national and international agreements/treaties such as the Malabo Declaration (committing 10% of public expenditure to agriculture). The need for national and regional level food reserves for building resilience to vulnerabilities, shocks and stresses was also emphasised.It was highlighted in the Sierra Leone Dialogues that the land tenure system is affecting commercial farming and needs to be resolved through the allocation of land for agricultural purposes. Another area of concern was that of mining companies degrading land and aquatic habitats that could be used for crop, livestock and fish production, respectively. It was suggested that land be reclaimed from the mining sector for food production. The need for modern farming technology, irrigation systems and crop intensification were highlighted as well as the waiving of agricultural input taxes for the next five years. The Sierra Leone Dialogues also that there is no standalone policy to address community disputes arising from the destruction of farmers' crops by grazing animals.The Nigerian Dialogues discussed the need to review existing policies that limit access to resources e.g. the Land Tenure System/Land Use Act. It was suggested that court rulings be enforced to grant women the right to inherit land. Stakeholders also recommended awareness programmes for policy makers on the importance of food systems for food and nutrition security, job creation and economic development, and the challenges facing food systems together with actions needed to fix them. Other recommendations included strengthening divisions within different ministries, departments and agencies of government, and ensuring budgetary provisions for nutritional programme implementation.It was suggested that Niger learn from the experience of Kenya and South Africa, who have established relatively low prices for fresh produce and have implemented import policies to fill gaps in the local market.Discussions in Burkina Faso suggested that national policies relating to food systems and their state of implementation are adequate but could be enhanced. It is important that national policies guarantee access to sufficient, diverse, healthy and nutritious food for all, including vulnerable people as well as ensure the adoption of good dietary practices and healthy lifestyles by consumers. • Promoting improved technologies for processing, preservation and packaging of food products;• Facilitating national producers' access to local and international markets;• Incentives for the development of partnership contracts between large urban suppliers and small rural family farmers for an adequate food supply for cities;• Promotion of efficient networks for the equitable distribution of food products;• Trade tax exemptions for the food and pharmaceutical sectors;• Considering the food sector's action plans in the multi-year expenditure planning document;• Popularisation of texts (laws, decrees, orders) and policy documents relating to the country's food systems;• Facilitating access to resources, financial support for the development of said systems; and• Strengthening of national research programmes on food and nutritional issues in Senegal. In the Nigerian Dialogues, it was noted that strong partnerships between government, the private sector and other funding agencies (both local and international) are needed to transform the food system. Emphasis was placed on the need for collaboration between national and state agencies and all relevant stakeholders, to be better able to understand the nature of the food system challenge and the gaps to be filled by agricultural extension workers.Stakeholders in Ghana made special mention of a need for partnerships to mobilise financial resources.particularly in the areas of seed production, GAPs and food preservation. Research institutes need to be better positioned to engage in demand-driven research. It was suggested that the private and public sectors establish a partnership to enhance domestic R&D capacity and ensure the dissemination and adoption of viable R&D output amongst Nigerian farmers.In Niger, discussions suggested that research is poorly funded, and the results are not adequately disseminated. Sufficient budget is needed for research to contribute to rural development through innovations and advice to users. A partnership framework needs to be developed between research institutions.In Ghana, stakeholders suggested that agriculture should be made attractive to the youth, however, some indicated that the youth are already attracted to agriculture but face other difficulties e.g. entering the poultry industry. The youth need support from the Government including access to arable land.In Nigeria, a key challenge mentioned by stakeholders was lobbying and interference by special interest groups such as large multinationals and some local industries. It was noted that to achieve equitable access to affordable healthy diets, the Government will need to commit to reducing the influence of interest groups within food systems and open the market to what people really need, rather than what food companies want consumers to buy. This would simultaneously improve consumption patterns. Furthermore, there were divergent views on the Government's actions towards improving nutrition, for example, some stakeholders were of the opinion that the Government is doing a considerable amount of sensitisation especially on breastfeeding, whereas others were of the opinion that the Government could do more in addressing issues concerning undernutrition e.g. poverty.In Guinea, contentious issues included the management of land disputes; conflict management between actors, particularly farmers and breeders; and policy for granting land to youth and women.In Niger, stakeholder opinions varied on subsidising agricultural inputs. Some stakeholders disagreed with the action saying it was only viable in the short term, as subsidies can create dependency, distort competition and private sector activities, and manifest a significant financial burden for the state in the long term. Other stakeholders were adamant that Niger cannot eliminate hunger without subsidising agricultural inputs and equipment.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 33 32 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processThe Nigerian Dialogues highlighted the following technology and innovation needs to increase resilience and productivity with a focus on nutrition:• Scale up technologies, particularly in relation to cold chains, to tackle post-harvest food losses;• Enhance innovation in agricultural production e.g. hydroponics, drip irrigation, mechanisation, biotechnology and genome editing;• Adopt modern farming techniques by providing farmers with technologies and farm implements that can be maintained by local farmers;• Use of drones for the application of fertiliser, herbicides and pesticides;• Conduct geological surveys and mapping for agricultural areas and those prone to insecurity;• Group security systems including community watches; and• Undertake soil and nutrient mapping, land banking and weather modelling to control poor farming systems.In Ghana, stakeholders mentioned the need to digitise food systems, for example, by using artificial intelligence, blockchain farming and hydroponics.Ghana, Sierra Leone, Nigeria and Niger all indicated constraints in accessing finance for healthy and sustainable foods. In Sierra Leone, policies surrounding access to finance for agricultural activities need to be reviewed as the conditions for loan repayment are not suitable for farmers. The current interest rates in commercial banks are too high and the period for repayment of loans needs to be specified in financial loan policies.to work with other partners who have agricultural know-how to create access to micro-finance for the youth and/or female entrepreneurs, in combination with business coaching and advisory services. In Niger, it was recommended that donors contribute to sector pooled funds in addition to the Investment Plan for Food and Nutritional Security.In Ghana, it was suggested by some stakeholders that there are too many 'middlemen' and that they inflate food prices. On the other hand, some stakeholders said the middlemen were important for linking farmers to markets.In Benin's Dialogues, farmers and herders had differing opinions on the management of corridors for livestock movement.In the Nigerian Dialogues, stakeholders disagreed on the assumption that youth want to work in agriculture or agroprocessing. The notion that a large proportion of youth is ready to be employed in low-paying, low-tech industries might be misplaced, and the question 'what do the youth want?' needs to be answered to inform demographic transition and youth policy design.by insurgency where women are becoming the household head. It was clear from different submissions that what is seen as a discriminatory social norm against a vulnerable group in one community might be a normal way of life in other communities, depending on the values and level of social indoctrination of the people. However, the issue of concern is the impact of gender inequality on food systems in the region. Some believed that women should be organised into groups, e.g. cooperatives for stronger participation whilst others felt that most women involved in farming have already formed producer groups, cooperatives, and associations and that the key challenge lies in access to production knowledge, technology and resources.In Sierra Leone, the right for women to own land was strongly debated. All the traditional leaders were against the motion for women to own land and the women representatives argued for it. Women argued that they are key players in the agricultural sector and deserve to own land. In addition, it was noted that the Government input supply chain model for community youth farms needs to be reviewed. Feedback from most participants indicated an appreciation for the Government's job creation efforts, however, some participants believed that the model for accessing inputs through mobile money needs to be revised to a voucher system.In Ghana, stakeholders disagreed on whether the country's food system had the capacity to prepare for, withstand and recover from climate change-related crises and shocks. Initially a few participants argued that the food system was resilient to climate change, however, their perceptions changed after a discussion on the indicators of resilience. Although the stakeholders agreed that the food system was vulnerable to climate change, they also noted the potential for resilience building.A few areas of divergence emerged during the Gambian Dialogues, particularly around land use and humanwildlife conflict. Stakeholders from the forestry and food production value chains could not agree on the expansion of agricultural lands at the expense of forests. Rice farmers complained about hippopotamuses invading and destroying their fields, but as they are protected animals, they cannot hunt them. This has resulted in lengthy discussions between the agriculture and wildlife departments.In Nigeria, divergences addressed the issue of a 'healthy diet' versus a 'sustainable diet'. A healthy diet was said to include \"a diversity of foods that are safe and provide levels of energy appropriate to age, sex, disease status and physical activity as well as essential micronutrients\". However, it was noted that healthy diets and sustainable diets are not mutually inclusive. Evidence suggests that synergies can be identified (e.g. reducing animal protein in meat-based diets) but are often exceedingly difficult to achieve. On the other hand, completely decoupling healthy diets from the sustainability of value chains that deliver them would also not be desirable from a food system, environmental and climate change perspective.Another divergence in the Nigerian Dialogues was on the establishment of Rural Grazing Area settlements to address the issues of livestock production and GHG emissions. It was highlighted that State governments need to meet with relevant stakeholders on the suitability of the programme given the diverse ecosystems that will be affected. In addition, it was noted that inorganic fertilisers are preferred to organic types, and there is a need for sensitisation/ capacity building on the benefits associated with the latter. Public awareness campaigns were central to enhancing sustainable consumption and production practices in Morocco and Tunisia. In Morocco, public awareness programmes were strengthened and operationalised to institutionalise information and training campaigns within structures responsible for disseminating good agricultural and food safety practices. Successful experiences were disseminated through mass media and social networks. Tunisia followed a similar approach to Morocco, using public awareness programmes to encourage a shift towards sustainable consumption and production patterns. Users were educated onIn Mauritania, stakeholders identified the key constraints to food security as the use of outdated farming techniques, the low technical capacity of producers, and difficulties in accessing land and funds.Nutritional awareness programmes and the promotion of healthier diets using the media and food guides were deemed necessary by Tunisia. In Morocco, the need to recognise the nutritional value of indigenous foods and return to their consumption was highlighted.Moroccan stakeholders recognised that the economic empowerment of women through access to resources, services, economic opportunities and decision making contributes to improved food security and more efficient and sustainable food systems.• Supporting women to exercise their fundamental rights;• Facilitating their access to employment, natural resources, services and markets;• Enabling entrepreneurship; and• Promoting their participation in political and governance processes.Northern region (Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia) the need to protect water and soil resources, the recycling of wastewater and the adoption of GAPs.In Egypt, stakeholders identified the key barriers to sustainable food systems as water scarcity, population growth, urbanisation, persistent food safety and quality challenges and the prevalence of unhealthy consumption patterns.Stakeholders in the Tunisian Dialogues suggested a review of international trade rules to make them better suited to sustainable food systems. The protection of producers through the establishment of a monitoring system on supply and market prices was also highlighted. In Mauritania, stakeholders indicated a need for improved import regulation, particularly of milk products.The Moroccan Dialogues described the need for fair, secure and sustainable supply chains to ensure the responsible use of natural resources, reduced food loss and food waste, and for making sustainability an easy choice for consumers.In Morocco, restaurant owners shared their concern about disposing of large amounts of uneaten food. The wastage of food shocked stakeholders working with food insecure households and presented an area for collaboration. In Morocco, it was established that agricultural trade and social policies facilitate access to affordable, safe and nutritious food for all. The need to review and update and/ or operationalise legislative mechanisms in the sectors of water, climate change, biodiversity, energy transition, women's empowerment, health security, nutritional quality, food loss and waste and the circular economy was emphasised. Furthermore, the Dialogues highlighted the misalignment between action logic and coordination mechanisms, which has limited the efficiency of interventions.There is also a need for improved participation and coordination, which can be achieved through the active engagement of all stakeholders in the development and implementation of strategies and the strengthening of coordination structures.Morocco's stakeholders indicated the need for an increase in funding for scientific research in the agricultural sector.Stakeholders also discussed the need for integrated and multidisciplinary research.In Tunisia, the use of digital technologies for the production of educational materials on consumption and sustainable production (e.g. applications, games, social networks) was discussed. Furthermore, digital applications could be developed to promote networking for the recovery and redistribution of food products and leftover meals. The strengthening of EWSs and digitisation of agriculture was mentioned as key.It was highlighted in the Mauritanian Dialogues, that the country has promoted and popularised agricultural mechanisation.In Tunisia, discussions took place on the geographic scale of regional food models.It was noted that some models are focused on the importance of returning to traditional foods specific to localities, whilst others focused on the relaunch of regional food models such as the Mediterranean diet.In Mauritania, some stakeholders mentioned the need to introduce differential taxes for imported products to reduce competition with the local market.Other stakeholders suggested that it would be more beneficial to support local producers with equipment and inputs, considering the global trade agreements in place (World Trade Organisation (WTO), AfCFTA and the Economic Community of West African States).In Mauritania, it was recognised that budget allocations need to be increased to meet basic infrastructure and human resource needs. In addition, smallholder and family farms require better access to financing and agricultural credit. Gabon's Dialogues highlighted the importance of looking at food system resilience not only with a climate change lens, but also addressing other shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated increased unemployment rate has resulted in lower purchasing power and a reduced demand for food. This in turn is resulting in food surpluses at the producer level, higher levels of post-harvest losses and food insecurity and malnutrition. Communitylevel education on contingency planning and risk management were suggested actions to address the issue of shocks. In addition, Gabon described the need to favour local production to strengthen the resilience of food systems in the face of crises such as COVID-19, which disrupted food value chains and importation.Central region (CAR, Cameroon, DRC, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon)In the Central region's Dialogues, improved land tenure, capacity building on good land management practices and equal access to subsidies were some of the action areas given to enhance sustainable food production. It was recognised in the Equatorial Guinea Dialogues that comprehensive and diversified training is needed for technicians and farmers to increase agricultural production. In addition, the Environmental Organisations Sector insisted on the importance of promoting the sustainable management of natural resources and biodiversity conservation. • Improved dietary data;• School feeding programmes;• Incorporation of nutritional education in school curricula;• Diversification of food production for more balanced diets;• Improved processing;• Fortification/enrichment methods; and• Modern food storage practices.but could be resolved through following guidelines such as the Codex Alimentarius. Consumers' knowledge of food safety was described as poor with a clear need for awareness creation.In Gabon, it was mentioned that people living with HIV are now included in agricultural projects with grants available to them to purchase agricultural land. The FAO has committed to continue supporting the empowerment of people living with HIV by providing training on vegetable production and balanced diets. Land has also been allocated to refugees for agricultural and commercial activities.Gabon's Dialogues. The youth have been mobilised through the digitalisation and mechanisation of agriculture but there is still a need to promote agricultural professions and provide incentives to In Gabon's Dialogues, special mention was made of the regional imbalance between farmers in the northern countries who benefit from subsidies and those in the south who tend to be small-scale farmers with limited resources. Mechanisms need to be developed to support the farmers in the south to protect biodiversity (protected fauna causes extensive damage to farmers' plantations) and to promote improved farming methods and sustainable forest management. Persistent humanwildlife conflict was noted as threatening food security as well as the lives of farmers with 8 deaths recorded in 2020, 15 accidents and 8,300 complaints. Furthermore, it was noted that the emigration of youth to urban areas is likely to continue, should a solution not be found. It was concluded that support from international bodies is needed in the implementation of ecoresponsible agriculture.Dialogues in the DRC highlighted the need to:• Guarantee access for all to healthy, affordable and nutritious food;• Switch to sustainable consumption patterns;• Stimulate production that respects nature;• Promote equitable livelihoods; and• Build resilience to vulnerabilities, shocks and stress.Land tenure was noted as a major barrier to sustainable agricultural production in the DRC.In Equatorial Guinea, the need for improved equity in rural transport was highlighted, as rural populations are economically excluded by food distribution barriers.In CAR, stakeholders indicated that smallholder farmers are responsible for the majority of food production but face multiple agricultural challenges such as a lack of access to good quality inputs (such as seeds, fertilisers, pesticides and supervision) and reliable machinery. It was mentioned that the resilience of vulnerable communities can be strengthened through the development of sustainable value chains and the establishment of food safety nets.In Equatorial Guinea's Dialogues, it was indicated that food handling in supply chains is poor and the control of food quality in public markets and grocery stores is inadequate.In the Central region, key areas for improving health and nutrition included nutritionsensitive agriculture, reducing the prices of nutritious foods, awareness campaigns on nutrition and indigenous foods, improved dietary guidelines and food safety standards. In the CAR Dialogues, it was mentioned that there is a need for the development of nutrition-sensitive agriculture with the ambition of reducing chronic malnutrition by at least 10% in three years.The Dialogues in Equatorial Guinea found that healthy and nutritious food is too expensive thereby limiting the population's access to it. Consequently, obesity, anaemia and child malnutrition have risen, and the country has promoted the production and consumption of healthy, safe and nutritious food.Nutritional awareness programmes and the promotion of healthier diets using the media and food guides were deemed necessary by Gabon. Stakeholders described an absence of food-based dietary guidelines and a lack of nutritional standards. Furthermore, the need for a return to the consumption of healthy indigenous foods was recognised.primary forests and other terrestrial and aquatic protected areas. The Dialogues in Gabon also highlighted the need for an increased budget for the Department of Agriculture so as to be able to respect the Maputo and Malabo agreements. Other action areas included the need to implement nutrition policies, strengthen collaboration between the Health Department and other sectors that deal with health issues, and to reform the legislative and regulatory framework to promote smallholders' access to land.Gabon identified the need for forestry companies to collaborate with the department responsible for infrastructure to maintain road networks essential for the flow of agricultural produce.In Equatorial Guinea and Gabon, stakeholders noted the need for State-funded research to improve agricultural production. Additionally, in Equatorial Guinea, it was recognised that all subsectors (e.g. crops, livestock, fisheries and forestry) need technical assistance in production, diagnosis of problems, coordination and financing for research.In the CAR Dialogues, customary law on land access proved a contentious issue as it does not allow equity in access to land nor the sustainable exploitation of non-timber forest products. Furthermore, current agricultural systems, concentrated around villages with limited resources, were noted as not being conducive to the establishment of large farms, which would likely create tension over land.In Equatorial Guinea, importance was placed on updating national legislation related to the food system and its sustainability. The livestock sector indicated a need to build a feed factory. This led to discussions on who should establish the factory, the Government or the private sector. Additionally, producers highlighted the need for better coordination between financial institutions and the competent ministerial departments to improve the selection of beneficiaries to financial facilities.In CAR, a support strategy has been established for small-scale producers which includes improved access to financing and Equatorial Guinea has entered high-level dialogue to work towards the Maputo agreement of investing 10% of resources in the agricultural sector.In Gabon, the Dialogues highlighted the need for mechanisms to mobilise funds for producers. It was deemed essential to set up an investment fund to support agricultural activities. It was noted that professionals from the agricultural sector are prepared to contribute to its establishment through voluntary financial contributions which will be supplemented by the State. Furthermore, it was suggested that banking institutions hire agricultural specialists to better assess the demands for related financing.Image: ©Juan Pablo Marin García (Alianza de Bioversity International / CIAT)AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 43 42 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process interest more young people. The State also needs to improve basic social services such as hospitals, schools, recreation centres and internet connectivity in rural areas.In Cameroon, an impact study was conducted on the socio-economic effects of COVID-19 on livelihood strategies undertaken by the rural poor and the adaptation of the agricultural sector as a whole. Consultation was inclusive with participation by the Regional Platform of Farmers' Organisations of Central Africa, youth, women, people with disabilities and other vulnerable groups. The consultation was facilitated by the Climate Smart Agriculture Youth Network Global.In CAR, a common vision for 2030 was identified through the involvement of different food system stakeholders, government, technical and financial partners, civil society, farmers' organisations as well as the national scientific community. The Government, through the Ministry of Agriculture, is to strengthen its leadership and coordinate actions.Stakeholders mentioned that Gabon is implementing a policy that reconciles agricultural production with environmental conservation. The National Land Use Plan is to provide a key instrument for the preservation ofIn Equatorial Guinea, special mention was made of the need for technical assistance by fisheries, particularly in the areas of:• Traditional boat repairs;• Safety and survival equipment at sea, such as radar;• Engine spare parts; and• Facilities for the conservation, handling and sale of fresh fish. As such, the momentum created by the UN Food System Summit is therefore an opportunity to substantially improve on and accelerate the pace of implementation of the CAADP/Malabo Agenda. The BR and AATS may be supplemented with additional indicators (e.g., processing and distribution as key segment in the food system) to better inform a more comprehensive planning, implementation, and tracking of transforming Africa's food systems. The aim of the report is to present individual Member States and collective performances in order to trigger continental, regional and national level action programmes to drive agricultural transformation in Africa.The report also helps to create more appetite for individual entities to strengthen national and regional institutional capacity for agriculture data collection and knowledge management to inform actions. Building on this principle, it is anticipated that this would support improved evidence-based planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, mutual learning and foster alignment, harmonization and coordination among multi-sectoral and multistakeholder efforts. Such efforts include the CAADP Malabo Policy Learning Event, the Permanent Secretaries' Retreat, engagements led by Regional Economic Communities (RECs), and platforms organized by partners.The report highlights the inclusive nature of the process and methodological approach that was used to collect and analyse data and write the report. Furthermore, the report also presents the key findings at continental and regional levels, the detailed profiles and scorecards of individual Member States, and sets of recommendations for individual Member States, regional bodies and continental institutions.The report is complemented by an online CAADP BR Communication Toolkit, used as a smart and powerful online interactive tool that presents the BR data in various forms, making it more easily accessible to users. The tool was developed by AU and its partners in close consultation with RECs, technical experts and other stakeholders as an accompanying output of the BR Report to facilitate the dissemination of its findings. The tool is designed to make it easier for policymakers and other stakeholders at national and regional level to interact with the data and information provided. The Toolkit contains clear graphics, analyses and maps that facilitate easier access to the information.Rwanda is ontrack to meet the goals and targets of Malabo by 2025, nineteen (19) countries are classified as progressive. With an overall score of 4.32, the continent is not-on-track to meeting the Malabo goals and targets by 2025. Regarding financing, the report shows that only four (4) countries invested at least 10% of their national expenditure on agriculture. Only one country is on track to meeting the vgoal by 2025. Both empirical observations and research findings presented in the report, show that the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts on agriculture and food security on the continent, could partly explain this low performance of the continent.For every reporting Member State, performance against the set targets is presented in the form of a \"Country Scorecard in implementing the Malabo Commitments\".For the first time, the report includes a section on the implementation of AU decisions, thematic in nature, and specific to agricultural transformation in Africa, on: Seed and Biotechnology; Livestock Development; Fisheries and Aquaculture; Irrigation; Mechanization; Fertilizer Use; Sanitary and Phytosanitary Capacities, Land Policy; and Ecological Organic Agriculture. This reporting period covers progress made by Member States in the implementation of the Malabo declaration for the period 2015 to 2020.As reflected in the key findings, the report presents the seven (7) thematic areas of performance, aligned with the commitments in the Malabo Declaration. It also evaluates country performance in achieving the goals and targets, which have been disaggregated into twenty-three (23) performance categories, and further divided into forty-six (46) indicators.In the Third BR Report, countries are considered 'on-track' if their total score is equal to or higher than the benchmark of 7.28; or 'progressive' when their score is equal to or more than 5 but less than 7.28; or 'not-on-track' if their score is less than 5.A total of fifty-one (51) AU Member States reported in this 3rd cycle of the Biennial Review process, up from the 49 Member States that reported in the 2nd Biennial Review cycle, and 43 in the inaugural Biennial Review cycle. Out of the 51 Member States that reported, 25 Member States registered increased scores between 2019 and 2021 review cycles. This reflects the commitment by Member States to the CAADP BR process and their efforts to address the shortfalls revealed in the inaugural and 2nd BR reports.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 53Image Top: ©Annie Spratt (Unsplash)• Member States, regional economic communities and AU should mount a strong communication and dissemination campaign on the findings in the report.The use of the CAADP biennial review communication toolkit and the biennial review dashboard should be encouraged among different stakeholders to view, observe and reflect on the findings in the report.• Member States, working in collaboration with all stakeholders, should ensure that national dialogues are convened to reflect on and discuss the results of this report to prioritize and develop policy and programmatic responses to speed up the implementation of the Malabo Declaration.RECs, Member States and development partners should be guided by the findings of this report to ensure alignment to the CAADP agenda.• Strengthen mutual accountability systems to include accountability for actions and results by a broader range of players, including the private sector, farmer organizations, civil society organizations, and development partners.• Member States should use the CAADP biennial review mechanism to report on progress in the implementation of the pathways for food systems transformation in the Africa Common Position to the UN Food System and national dialogues report.• AU should undertake an external evaluation/audit of the overall biennial review process to establish the efficacy of the self-reporting system and to suggest measures to strengthen the quality and robustness of the process at national, regional and continental levels.• Stronger political leadership and commitment is required in order for government to mobilize stakeholder buyin for financing and implementation of key recommendations. A central multi-sectoral coordination mechanism is required for effective CAADP implementation.• Member States are urged to design, fund and implement carefully selected priority programs and projects to fast-track the achievement of the seven Malabo Commitments. In this regard, Member States should intensify efforts to develop and implement Malabocompliant high-quality NAIP.• Strengthen the capacity of regional economic communities, given the critical role they play in mobilizing member state in the biennial review process, by providing them with more human and financial resources.• Member States are encouraged to integrate the CAADP biennial review data collection process into existing national monitoring and reporting systems, including the joint sector review processes.• AU and Member States need to develop and strengthen implementable mechanisms for peer learning. Well-structured peerto-peer learning and exchange should be an integral part of the CAADP process.• From the experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic, Member States should establish stronger emergency response plans and commit to building more resilient food systems to respond better to future shocks.The 2021 biennial review report calls for action to transform Africa's agriculture"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3814029137.json b/main/part_2/3814029137.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6630f9dfec214dae003dc3dbf9a7b4fecf8cc487 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3814029137.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"480dad3668f292a3f056e4217549f9d7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3079e794-a578-4015-b3ee-25dfebb21429/content","id":"-1089846973"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6ebe2736-51ee-4688-9b8f-b49ba60c78f9","content":"We present an assessment of the extent, diversity, and nutritional contribution of the milpa through a quantitative analysis of data from a survey conducted in 989 small scale farm households in the Western Highlands of Guatemala (WHG). The milpa is a traditional agricultural system in which maize is intercropped with other species, such as common beans, faba beans, squashes or potatoes. Our study shows that more than two-thirds of the 1,205 plots recorded were under the milpa system, with a great diversity of crop combinations. As shown with the 357 plots for which specific yields were available, milpa systems present higher total productivity than monocropped maize, expressed as total energy yield of the harvested crops in the respective system, and were also better at providing the recommended daily allowances of fourteen essential nutrients, based on a Potential Nutrient Adequacy (PNA) indicator. Maize-bean-potato, maize-potato, and maize-bean-faba intercrops had the highest PNAs, and monocropped maize, the lowest. These results support the implementation of milpa systems tailored to different agro-ecologies in order to improve nutrition in the WHG and a variety of similar regions.Maize (Zea mays) is one of the most widely cultivated crops in the world, produced on almost 200 million hectares in practically all countries of the world 1 . In Mesoamerica, its center of origin and diversity 2,3 farmers have traditionally intercropped maize with several other species in what is known as the \"milpa\" or \"three sisters\" system 4,5 . The milpa typically comprises maize intercropped with common beans (Phaseolus spp.) and squashes (Cucurbita spp.) (Fig. 1) 6 . Archaeological and historical evidence identifies the milpa as the backbone of agriculture in pre-Columbian times in the vast region spanning from northeast North America to southern Central America 4,5,7 .Farmers throughout Mesoamerica continue to grow maize in variants of the milpa system in a range of agro-ecologies from arid and semiarid zones to the temperate highlands and tropical lowlands. In addition to being intercropped with common beans and squash, maize may be grown with faba beans (Vicia faba), peppers (Capsicum spp.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), potato (Solanum tuberosum) and amaranth (Amaranthus spp.), among others, and even with wild leafy species used as food or for medicinal purposes 8 . The degree of variation in the milpa systems depends on different factors including climate, soil type, topography, natural vegetation, traditional knowledge, culture and diets.Studies of the total productivity of milpas grown under partially controlled conditions, have shown them to be an example of efficient traditional cropping system. In milpa systems, niche complementarity, competition, and facilitation among species, contribute synergistically to overall performance 7,9,10 , chiefly through the efficient use of land, water, nutrients, and light 11,12 . In the classic maize-bean-squash milpa, for example, the maize stalk supports the climbing bean, increasing the latter's access to light, while the bean plant fixes additional nitrogen in the soil. The squash shades the soil surface, reducing moisture loss and impeding weed growth (Fig. 1).The Western Highlands of Guatemala (WHG) is among the world's poorest regions and food insecurity and malnutrition affect more than half of its inhabitants 13,14 . Recent research has highlighted the milpa's critical role as a source of food and nutritional security 1516 , providing both macro (starch, protein, fat) and micro-nutrients (vitamins and minerals). This contribution of the milpa to nutrition is especially relevant for small-scale farm households and communities such as the WHG, whose inhabitants consume nearly all they produce 13,17 .Here we report on the extent and diversity of milpa systems in the WHG using data collected on a survey of 989 farm households located across 59 villages of the region. We also present a quantitative analysis to assess, at the plot level, the potential contribution of the different milpa systems to food and nutritional security, by determining the number of persons a given area of milpa can adequately feed. With data from all the 357 plots for which there were specific yield values, we calculated, at plot level, both the total crop productivity (expressed as total energy yield of the harvested crops in the respective system) and the Potential Nutrient Adequacy (PNA), which is a recently developed indicator based on ecological niche theory 18 . To our knowledge, this is the first report on the relation between the milpa intercropping diversity and its nutritional capacity, at least the first that takes on account data from more than one or a few plots or crop combinations. We believe the results of this analysis can inform a variety of research and development efforts oriented to improve the lives of rural families in the WHG and similar regions.Milpa extent and diversity. The 989 households surveyed, reported a total of 1,541 plots, with an overall combined area of 297.8 ha, where maize, coffee, potato, and other crops were grown. The average agricultural area per household is 0.30 ha (median 0.17 ha). The survey took in only farm households that grew maize in at least one of their plots (see section \"Data\"), but the importance of maize in local diets can be nonetheless appreciated in that 78% of the plots (1205) were used to grow it. Of the 1,205 maize plots, 829 of them (69% of the plots and 73% of the maize area) included maize in association (or milpas) with at least one other crop, among them common beans, faba beans, potato, squashes, fruit trees, coffee and/or vegetables. Maize in monocrop was found on 376 plots (31% of the plots and 27% of the maize area), and those plots were significantly smaller than the milpa plots, with average areas of 0.15 vs 0.18 ha (Fig. 2), respectively.The 829 milpa plots showed diverse cropping combinations including maize with beans on 78% of the plots, with potato on 10%, and with faba bean on about 5%. In 24% of the milpa plots (203) maize was associated with two other crops while in 4% of the cases (34) it was associated with other three crops. The most common milpa included maize-beans (644 plots), 68% these plots featured only these two crops while the rest were further diversified with squash (17%), potato (6%) and faba bean (6%) (Fig. 2). Milpa yield performance and contribution to food security. Because of the structure of the survey applied we could only calculate yield values for the different crops reported from 357 plots (i.e. crop production in one section of the survey and area and cropping patterns of each plot in another section, therefore discarding for the analysis all farmers with more than one plot as it was not possible to calculate yield at the plot level-See section \"Milpa and food security\"). Maize grain yields were very variable in both maize monocrop and the milpa systems and were lower under the milpa system, averaging 1801 kg ha −1 (sd = 1011), compared to monocropped maize (average of 1981 kg ha −1 , sd = 1099) but was not significantly different (Wilcoxon test, W = 17,390, p-value = 0.107) (Fig. 3a) suggesting no yield penalty when maize is associated with other crops found in the milpa systems. The total caloric yield (calculated based on the kCal content of different crops-See section \"Potential adequacy of milpas for human nutrition\" and Supplementary Tables 3 and 4) of milpa systems was consistently higher than that of the maize monocrop (Fig. 3b), providing more food energy per unit area than sole maize.Average maize grain yield for the different milpa systems ranged from 1233 kg ha −1 for maize-potato to 2320 kg ha −1 for maize-bean-faba. After pairwise post-hoc comparisons (Dunn's test), some significant differences on maize yield can be found among crop combinations, being maize-potato and maize-bean-squash significantly lower than maize in monocrop and maize-bean-faba (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 2). However, because of the difference in sample size for the different intercropping systems, the results should be taken with caution. Maize plots reported in the survey of farm households in the Western Highlands of Guatemala. Milpa systems and their varied crop combinations are represented in different colours. The tree is nested, so the first node displays all maize plots, with successive splits for monocrop vs intercropped maize and with crop names presented according to how often they were grown (overall: maize > common beans > potatoes > squash > faba beans > fruit trees > vegetables). Numbers in the boxes superimposed on the arrows are the percentages, of number of plots and area under the respective milpa system, of the total 1 205 maize plots.Nutrition contribution and nutrient adequacy of the milpa system. The nutritional functional diversity (NFD) of the milpa systems will always be higher than NFD of a maize monocrop, as other crops provide additional nutrients. NFD increases with crop species diversity and especially when the additional crops come from different botanical families. Assuming that milpa is the sole food provider, the potential number of people fed (PNPF) was calculated considering the essential components of human nutrition, the nutrient concentrations in the common edible parts of the raw crops, and the amounts of each crop produced. In this study, PNPF was highest for three intercrops: maize-bean-potatoes, maize-bean-faba and maize-potatoes (Fig. 5). The maize-bean-squash, maize-bean and maize-faba intercrops showed an intermediate PNPF for most nutrients and maize-squash and maize in monocrop had the lowest PNPF values for most nutrients.The Potential Nutrient Adequacy (PNA) represents the balanced level of nutrients provided by each crop combination considering all nutrients and their recommended daily allowances (See Sect. 4.4). The different milpa systems showed significant differences in their PNA values (Kruskal-Wallis Chi-sq. = 46.5, p < 7.01 e-08) (Fig. 6). After Dunn's post hoc test, the PNA of the maize monocrop was found to be significantly below most of other PNA values while the PNA for maize-bean-faba, maize-potato, and maize-bean-potato were significantly higher than the rest. The PNA for maize-bean, maize-squash, maize-bean-squash and maize-faba were in the mid-range and did not show significant differences (Fig. 6).This study showed the extent and diversity of the milpa system and its potential contribution to the nutritional security of small-scale farm households in the WHG. It highlights the importance of milpa system in the WHG and the advantages of maize intercropping over mono-cropping in subsistence farming systems. It also highlights the nutritional potential of the different milpa combinations that are traditionally grown in WHG. Whereas the classic milpa features a maize-bean-squash intercrop, in the WHG maize-bean was the most common combination with variants that included faba bean, potatoes, peas, vegetables and fruit trees. This likely reflects the range of altitude (1,400 to 3,200 masl) and corresponding agroclimatic variation in the WHG, but especially farmers' choices based on their needs, means, market opportunities, knowledge and traditions.The milpa system is the classic example of an efficient multi/mixed-cropping system, which tends to be more productive and efficient in use of light, nutrients and water than monocrop systems, given its internal dynamics of complementarity, competition and facilitation. For example, the mechanisms of interspecific root interactions where maize root exudates promote nodulation of the faba bean, making maize-faba intercrops more efficient than their monocrops have been described 19 .The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) is a common way to measure the yield advantage of multi vs monocropping systems 20 . In field experiments mimicking the traditional Iroquoian three sisters system in the north-eastern USA, LERs of between 1.06 and 1.3 were found 7 . Under experimental conditions in Central Mexico, LERs for the maize-bean-squash milpa of between 1.6 and 1.9, which corresponds to 60% and 90% greater total productivity than a maize monocrop, were reported 10 . Even higher yield advantages have been reported for the milpa system when integrated with fruit trees 21 . LERs were not calculated in this study due to the lack of robust information on the performance of all crops (e.g. common beans, squash, faba bean, potatoes) grown in monoculture. However, given that our study found no significant yield difference for maize when grown alone or with other crops, we can consider that the LER for the milpa systems in the WHG would be, in most cases, greater than or equal to 1.0. Further analysis, possibly including more targeted data collection and experimentation, could help identifying best crop combinations in specific agro-ecologies for improved agronomic performance of milpa systems.Our results show higher nutritional output of the milpa systems over monocropped maize in the WHG. This is based on the Potential Nutrient Adequacy (PNA), which takes into account not only the diversity of nutrients and nutrient sources, as does the dietary diversity index 22 , but also includes (1) how much is produced by each crop and their nutrient concentrations and (2) the recommended daily intake for each nutrient, thus providing a more complete estimation of the potential contribution of the milpa system to the nutrition security of farm households in the WHG. Dietary diversity studies, defined as the number of food groups consumed, have shown that increasing farming diversity often increases the nutrient adequacy of the human diet 23 . The PNA of the milpa system thus offers a good estimation of its contribution to nutritional security in the WHG and supports the idea that dietary diversity and crop and animal species richness in farm households are positively correlated 24 .Beyond yield and calories, milpa systems produced significantly more other essential nutrients. The maizebean-faba, maize-potatoes and maize-bean-potatoes associations had highest PNAs, contributing the most carbohydrates, proteins, zinc, iron, calcium, potassium, folate, thiamin, riboflavin, vitamin B6, niacin and vitamin C. Similar results showed that, in a trial implemented in USA, the maize-bean-squash intercrop provided more calories and proteins than a maize monocrop 15 . Based on a case study with one family farm in southern Mexico, it was shown that an average family with the average amount of land in a Mayan community could meet the daily nutritional requirements for fat, carbohydrates, fiber, protein, vitamins A and C, calcium, iron, zinc, and niacin, through diets based on products from the milpa 16 . One important limitation to highlight in these studies, as well as the one presented here, is the fact that all calculations are based on the production and concentration of nutrients in their raw form; the nutritional contribution of the cooked food considering consumption patterns (portions size and frequency), the nutritional contributions of food obtained outside the milpa system such as poultry, livestock and home-gardens or purchased food, and the storage of milpa products and associated effects on nutrient stability need to be studied 25,26 . Equally important is the variation in the availability of milpa products throughout the year, given crops' seasonality.This study focused on the plot level, i.e. characterizing the diversity of milpa systems and their production of different nutrients. Results are shown at the hectare and yearly basis to allow comparison and use of standard indicators for assessing the performance of cropping systems. For example, in Fig. 5 our results show that one hectare of the different crop combinations can provide enough protein to satisfy the needs of between 5.5 and 9.8 male adults for a year, while for iron these values range between 11.7 and 21.1 (i.e. the Potential Number of People Fed (PNPF)). However, to better grasp the contribution of the milpa systems to the nutritional security of subsistence farmers households in the WHG, it is needed to take into account that (1) most farm households in the WHG have less than a quarter of a hectare (an average of 0.30 and a median of 0.17 for the households surveyed) and that (2) the average number of people per household (comprising all ages) in the survey is six. Thus, despite the advantages of some milpa systems to provide more nutrients per unit of land, the generalised low land availability for small scale farmers in the WHG makes it impossible for the milpa system alone to satisfy the needs of all household members. This structural problem of land availability and general marginalization of indigenous communities in the WHG has been widely documented and is one of the main causes of the endemic poverty and malnutrition in the region 13,14,17 . Farmers in the WHG have been forced to find alternative food sources through, for example, the production of cash crops (such as non-traditional export vegetables) and buy staple crops with the money generated or/and national and international migration to generate enough earning to complement their own production of food.In conclusion, our study shows the great extent and diversity of milpa systems in the WHG. Total food productivity and nutrient functional diversity advantages in milpa systems, over maize in monocrop, were found in small-scale farm households in the WHG. These findings highlight the importance of this traditional cropping system for smallholder farmers' nutritional security in the region. The milpa system alone has not, and will not, completely satisfy food demand for farm households in the WHG but, together with other sources of food either produced on-farm or purchased, can contribute importantly to improve the nutritional situation of this impoverished and marginalised region. Depending on specific characteristics of the farm households, their agro-ecological conditions and their availability of different sources of food and nutrients, milpa systems can be tailored to improve the food and nutritional security of small-scale farmers in the WHG and in a wide range of similar regions.Data. Data were collected in 2015 through a survey deployed as part of the Feed the Future Buena Milpa project (http://www.cimmy t.org/proje ct-profi le/buena -milpa /). The project's goal was to reduce food insecurity and malnutrition by fostering sustainable, resilient, and innovative maize-based farming systems in the WHG.We conducted the survey, with support from local researchers and agronomy students of the University of San Carlos (USAC), in summer of 2015 in 989 maize-growing farm households in 64 communities of 16 municipalities of the WHG. The number of surveys at the departmental level was: Totonicapán (226), Quiche (350), Quetzaltenango (187) and Huehuetenango (226) (See Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1 for details). Criteria to select communities were: location within the targeted municipalities in the Buena Milpa project, the active work of project partners within the communities, and their distribution within four selected watersheds that included farming systems at different altitudes, ranging from 1400 to 3200 masl. For household selection, enumerators walked radial transects to survey household members, choosing only households that explicitly agreed to participate and had agricultural land on at least part of which maize was grown. The survey was a closed questionnaire with 139 questions in 18 sections including 5 project themes: milpa-maize germplasm improvement, natural resource conservation in farming system, farming system diversification, agricultural innovation systems and social inclusion.Milpa diversity and extent. We used survey findings regarding the previous year's crop production (2014) for all 989 surveyed households to understand the importance and diversity of the milpa system. The 989 households reported crop production on a total of 1,541 plots, 1,324 of which included maize. The other 217 plots grew potato (85 plots), coffee (50), vegetables (31), bean (19), fruit trees (12), faba bean (7), forestry trees (6), pea (2), oats, wheat, etc. Given the study's focus on smallholder farmers, we discarded other 119 plots that had unrealistically large values for plot size or maize production levels for the region (i.e. more than ten times the average plot size or calculated maize yield, > 2 ha and > 11 ton ha −1 year −1 ).For the resulting 1205 plots we constructed a tree depicting maize-system diversity in the WHG, with each node indicating the main cropping associations. The tree was nested, so the first node displays all maize plots, with successive splits for monocrop vs intercropped maize and with crop names presented according to how often they are grown (overall: maize > common beans > potatoes > squash > faba beans > fruit trees > vegetables). So, in plots where maize is grown with potatoes and common beans, the association is termed maize-bean-potatoes.Milpa and food security. We assessed maize yield differences for monocropping and intercropping to detect a yield penalty or advantage for maize (see below), including survey information only for households from which we had available yield data for all crops. In the survey, total production for each crop was recorded regardless of the number of plots on which it was grown and therefore, for 398 households (40.2% of the sample) that had more than one plot under maize or any of the milpa crops, it was impossible to calculate the yield and had to be discarded from the analysis due to a lack of available plot-level information. The results were further screened for complete crop information and unrealistic values on crop production levels (i.e. ten times higher than the average yield for the different crops-See Supplemental Table 2), resulting in a usable sample of 368 plots.For statistical analysis, only those crop combinations with a sample size equal to or greater than 9 plots were selected, resulting in 357 plots with, in descending order, the following numbers of 300 plots sown to each cropping combination: maize monocrop (163), maize-bean (109), maize-bean-squash (30), maize-bean/faba (12), maize-potato (13), maize-squash (11), maize-bean-potato (10), maize-faba (9). Other crop combinations with very low sample sizes were maize-squash-faba (4), maize-potato-faba (3), maize-bean-squash-faba (2), maize-bean-potato-faba (1) and maize-bean-potato-squash (1), making it difficult to include them in further statistical analyses.Maize yields for plots under monocropped maize (163) were first compared to maize yields from intercropped plots (194). To choose the most appropriate statistical test, we checked if the outcome variable, maize yield, met the assumptions required for a parametric test. Although we had independent samples, large sample sizes, and homogeneous variances (F = 1.1809, p-value = 0.267), maize yield proved to be non-normally distributed after Shapiro-Wilks normality test was significant (W = 0.911, p-value < 0.000 (1.398e−13)). Thus, we choose a nonparametric test, the Wilcoxon rank-sum (also known as the independent 2-group Mann-Whitney U Test), to compare maize yields in monocrop and intercrop. Results are shown in boxplots for yield of both groups in Fig. 3-A. Maize yield was also compared between all eight crop associations, as maize yield presented a non-normal distribution and we have several groups to compare, a Kruskal-Wallis test, was performed. While in general, omnibus test like Kruskal-Wallis are used to detect the existence of at least one significant difference across groups, sometimes they fail in detecting significant differences between pairs of groups, and hence we decided to perform a post hoc test. The Dunn's test of multiple comparisons was selected as the most appropriate one as it is suited for groups with unequal number of observations 27 and because it retains the rank sums from the omnibus test, this case Kruskal-Wallis 28 . Results of maize yields for the different cropping systems and Dunn's test significant groups are presented with boxplots in Fig. 4.We applied a Functional Diversity approach used in ecology research [29][30][31] to assess the nutritional performance of milpa systems. We calculated the number of people who can obtain recommended daily allowances (RDA) of 14 different nutrients from different milpa systems. We then calculated the Potential Nutrient Adequacy (PNA) 18 to determine the number of persons (male adult equivalents) who could obtain RDAs of a full set of nutrients from 1 ha of a milpa system, including monocropped maize and associations, using the following equation:where N is the number of nutrients considered (14), s i is the fraction of potentially nourished male adults by a given nutrient, and s is the average of potentially nourished persons for all nutrients. To calculate s we multiplied the yield of each crop reported in the survey (kg ha −1 ) by the nutrient composition of each crop, using the content per 100 g of the 14 different nutrients for each crop, as per the INCAP Food Composition Table for Central America 32 and using the INCAP RDA for an adult male 33 (See Supplementary Tables 3 and 4). All values were calculated per hectare and year. PNA levels across cropping associations were also compared. First, we checked if PNA data met the assumptions required for a parametric test. PNA variances proved to be nonhomogeneous (F = 14.5, p-value = < 2e-16) and also have a non-normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk , W = 0.93742, p-value = 4.107e-11). Thus, a Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn's tests were performed to assess PNA differences between cropping combinations. Results are presented with boxplots in Fig. 6."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3820290805.json b/main/part_2/3820290805.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f52ddbb5d3dd705422d453695deac9c2c1891fe --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3820290805.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"098b1ef243c2a38ca5888e2c645681a6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/cbaa5cba-01d0-4819-99e8-715a4fb581c5/retrieve","id":"-2001916943"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"600d2105-a16c-494c-8d0a-8feb6725a54f","content":"Image cover | ©Georgina Smith (ILRI) About AICCRA | Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research in Africa (AICCRA) is a project that helps deliver a climate-smart African future driven by science and innovation in agriculture. It is led by the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT and supported by a grant from the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank. Explore AICCRA's work at aiccra.cgiar.org 01 The priority of food systems transformation in Africa 1 02 Continental policy -linking food systems and climate change 03 Defining a food system 04 Climate change impacts on food systems 05 Promoting transformation in food systems 06 A framework and diagnostic checklist for considering elements of food systems transformation 13Even for today's population, the status of the continent's food and nutrition security is a major concern. In 2019, more than 19% of the population, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), was categorized as hungry. This figure is projected to increase to nearly 26% by 2030 1 unless radical measures are taken to improve the continent's food system in the face of climate change and other factors that undermine efforts to improve food security.To sustainably feed its growing population, the continent will require a transformation of its food systems.Africa's commitment to transform its food systems is articulated in the continental blueprint, Agenda 2063, and associated policy frameworks. The Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) and the African Union's Malabo Declaration on Accelerated Agricultural Growth and Transformation for Shared Prosperity and Improved Livelihoods provide a coherent framework for tackling intrinsic challenges within Africa's many food systems. These frameworks spell out the continent's targets for food and agriculture by 2025 using 2013 as the baseline year. The targets are to end hunger, halve poverty, triple intra-Africa trade and ensure that at least 30% of livelihoods dependent on agriculture are resilient to climate change. The challenge is to reconcile between these frameworks and provide a mechanism for tracking progress in multiple domains based on country reporting. The Malabo Declaration made specific commitments to mutual accountability on action and results.The latest report 3 on progress towards the Malabo targets shows that by 2019, only 4 countries were on track out of 49 countries that provided data on the required indicators. This underscores the need and urgency to accelerate progress towards CAADP targets, as well as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 2 targets to achieve zero hunger by 2030.Accelerating this progress requires a profound change in all facets of the food system, especially in the context of climate change, emerging pandemics, and threats to biological diversity. Food systems continent-wide are under increasing pressure and, to date, have not been able to produce sufficient quantities of food, meet nutrition needs, benefit populations equally and equitably, or address the negative impacts of food on the environment and natural resources 4 . Unless the necessary changes are urgently addressed, the unprecedented threats will compound and deepen the existing failings in the food systems. Africa has the world's fastest growing population, estimated to reach 1.7 billion by 2030. This number is expected to increase to 2.5 billion by 2050Priority intervention areas the strategy spells out for food systemsPromote the equitable sharing of climate risk and reward amongst all food system actors, especially small-scale, rural farmers.Enhance resilience of food systems against climate effects, while emphasising nutrition outcomes and integrated planning.Emphasise production toward agro-ecological transition, to reduce GHG intensity (including methane and other gases), and dependencies on external inputs.Strengthen food system governance interventions across Africa's regions.It is within this wider framing that the authors a. provide a brief overview of food systems, specifically highlighting the climate change dimension;b. unpack the notion of transformational and incremental approaches; and c. offer a diagnostic checklist for catalysing and expanding food systems transformation.In Accelerating this progress requires a profound change in all facets of the food system, especially in the context of climate change, emerging pandemics, and threats to biological diversity. Food systems continent-wide are under increasing pressure and have yet to produce sufficient quantities of food of appropriate quality, or to prioritise nutritional outcomes and needs in agricultural sector planning. National and regional organizations and governments will need to work hard to benefit populations equally and equitably, and to account for and address the negative impacts of food systems on the environment and natural resources. At the same time, large amounts of investment will need to be sought so that biophysical, social and ecological performance indicators can be monitored rapidly and efficiently to ensure progress towards the continent's food system targets.The challenges of prioritising, financing and implementing the changes needed in Africa's food systems need to be urgently addressed, so that existing failings can be rectified and the threats from climate change addressed. Central to these challenges are dimensions of inclusion, equitable distribution of risks and benefits across food systems, and a focus on gender, youth empowerment, and rural employment Priorities for research and innovation need to focus on addressing the fundamental challenges faced by farmers, which relate to policies, institutions, and society in general. In the past, the prevailing focus of research and innovation has tended to concentrate largely on technical solutions.For the future, technical innovation needs to be supported by appropriate enabling conditions so that the finance, markets, capacity development, policy and regulatory frameworks and social safety nets needed are all in place. Crucially, the needs and voices of farmers who are on the frontline of climate change and most exposed to the risk need to be at the centre of the transformation agenda.Issues concerning the food system include the governance and economics of food production and its sustainability, the opportunities to reduce post-harvest losses and waste throughout the food system, how food production affects the natural environment and the impact on individual and population health. 6 7Functioning, sustainable food systems are intended to deliver food security and nutrition for all, resulting in: profitability (economic sustainability), broad-based benefits for society (social sustainability) and positive or neutral impact on the natural environment (environmental sustainability). 8Multiple food systems frameworks exist with varying degrees of complexity. Each depict the socio-economic and environmental drivers that influence food system activities and recognize food systems outcomes that include food security (utilization, access, availability, stability and resilience), socio-economic and environmental outcomes.A food system is a complex web of activities involving the production, processing, transportation and consumption of all connecting people to their food (see Figure 1). And, climate change will continue to have pervasive impacts on food systems activities resulting in production losses, nutrient deficiencies, environmental hazards, human displacement and potential for conflict (see Figure 2). Subsequently as food systems transformation is undertaken to meet socioeconomic, food security and environmental outcomes, enhancing resilience to the impacts of climate change will play a major part.Examining food systems in the face of both longterm and short-term shocks and change suggests the need for systems transformation. The UN Food Systems Summit created the opportunity for national food systems dialogues that brought together a wide range of stakeholders to share experiences and consider ways to improve food systems that are suitable for people and the planet. 12In preparation for the Summit, countries throughout Africa have hosted national and sub-national multistakeholder dialogues to consider transformative actions in their food systems.Tracks that underpin necessary transformations to achieve food systems outcomes. These are:Ensuring access to safe and nutritious food for all (enabling all people to be well nourished and healthy).Shifting to sustainable consumption patterns (promoting and creating demand for healthy and sustainable diets, reducing waste).Boosting nature-positive production at sufficient scale.Advancing equitable livelihoods and value distribution (raising incomes, distributing risk, expanding inclusion, creating jobs).Building resilience to vulnerabilities, shocks and stresses (ensuring the continued functionality of healthy and sustainable food systems).How is transformation defined? Agriculture and food systems How is transformation defined? Agriculture and food systems transformation in one formulation is \"a significant redistribution-by at least a third-of land, labour and capital, and/ or outputs and outcomes (e.g. types and amounts of production and consumption of goods and services) within a timeframe of a decade.\" 13While this definition frames transformation in a quantitative sense, important qualitative dimensions are also identified, such as \"multifaceted, multi-dimensional, multi-sectoral, multi-scale change resulting in new systems and processes incorporating a range of transitional, diverse innovations and interventions that intersect to create momentum and critical mass\". 14 It is important to distinguish between transformative change and incremental shifts; the latter occurring more slowly without modifying essence of existing structures. 15 For transformative change to occur, incremental shifts must be directed toward and contribute to significant systems change that disrupts rules, behaviours and practices. 16 A wider lens, for example on patterns on food consumption, preferences, constraints, food quality and environmental implications.Unpacking gender roles and dynamics in food systems and how this links to aspects such as nutritional status and social empowerment.Encourage partners to step up efforts to align health and agriculture-related policies and investments and expand these efforts to partnerships with commerce, trade and industry, food standards authorities, environment-related authorities.Engage more pro-actively and substantially with the private sector.Broadening focus to policies that affect the availability, diversity, affordability and desirability of foods, for example: food safety and quality; regulation of food marketing; food loss and waste; food trade; agricultural and natural resource management policies; social protection and food subsidies.Mobilize support to strengthen the capacity of local authorities. Raising awareness of national policies at grassroots level.Promote investments in well-designed public awareness-raising campaigns and adequate marketing and labelling regulations.These can be used to inform nutrition public awareness-raising campaigns, food regulations, as well as set standards for school meals, food assistance programmes and other public food procurement programmes, creating incentives for the food industry to supply more nutritious foods and guide investments in agriculture.Making agricultural investments and value chains nutrition-sensitive.Strengthening synergies between food and agriculture investments and nutrition policies and programmes.Closing the gender gap in agriculture by improving rural women's access to land, assets, resources, technologies, services and opportunities, and the promotion of gender-sensitive policy frameworks.Encourage large private investors (food industry, private foundations, pension funds, etc.) and venture capitalists to make investments at country level in initiatives and enterprises that bring healthy foods to local markets, while preserving the environment and generating employment opportunities. These build upon the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and Solutions Clusters 19 -but also respond to the contributions of sub-national dialogues, and provide important feedback to help include participants who may or may not have been party to the process leading up to the Summit.The critical task includes synthesizing and translating insights and identified resources to place-based, specific applications, where the 'rubber will hit the road'. Building a greater sense of ownership and agency are essential ingredients to an effective process of deliberation, uptake and implementation.It is with this next, critical undertaking in play, that a diagnostic framework and check list have been developed to elaborate the elements of food systems transformation. The authors have reviewed different frameworks, checklists and narratives around transformative food systems to suggest questions to consider in navigating the many dimensions of food systems transformation and test current strategies for their level or degree of comprehensiveness. The checklist begins with a section on the processes and approaches to catalyse and support food system transformation followed by substantive elements of food systems.This diagnostic framework and checklist aim to assist Member States, Regional Economic Communities (RECs), the African Union Commission (AUC), sub-regional agricultural research organizations (ASARECA, CCARDESA, CORAF, NAASRO), AFAAS, CGIAR centres, FANRPAN, AGRA, PAFO and other key stakeholders within national food systems.Within the Annex 1, there are suggested readings on checklist element along with indicative, relevant Solutions Clusters of the Food System Summit. These have been embedded to draw connections between identified global priorities grouped with those elements that correspond to emerging discussions on transformative pathways. Annex 2 offers a table to provide potential user groups a guide to checklist elements that may be of interest to their expertise and experience.Following the formal UN Food Systems Summit in September 2021, the African Union member states now need to take up the critical task of putting together context-specific, finely tuned and staged strategies to transform food systems in Africa. • Are intentional linkages across formal and informal food systems made?• Have novel partnerships across disciplines, themes, stakeholders, sectors and scales been created?• Have action research, practice and policy been intentionally linked?• What measures have been put in place to address existing inequities and injustices in the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of the food system?• What elements of a just transition are articulated?• Has climate justice for marginalized actors been addressed?• How have food rights-based approaches been demonstrated?A FRAMEWORK AND DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST FOR CONSIDERING ELEMENTS OF FOOD SYSTEMS TRANSFORMATION• How are transitions to agroecological, regenerative, nature-based and indigenous approaches for integrated farming and pastoral systems or resilient landscapes (practices to increase agrobiodiversity, conserve land and water, cycle nutrients, reduce waste and enhance productivity) being demonstrated?• Has nature and the ecosystem services that it provides been sufficiently valued, and have these values been included in decision making?• Is the condition and integrity of the natural resource base being adequately considered, and is the potential for sustainable use of ecosystems services and equitable provision of rewards clearly addressed?• What steps are industrial agriculture actors taking toward transitioning to resilient and just food system practices?• How are nature based solutions and linkages between rural and urban communities being identified and promoted?• What is the trajectory for increasing availability of quality food produced through nature based solutions?• How gender and youth responsive are agricultural practices?• What conditions and historical practices have been shaping consumer consumption patterns?• Are multiple options demonstrated for increasing and distributing quality food and improving availability across different contexts in the country?• How are food affordability/ purchasing power being integrated into transformative interventions?• Are products designed to capture consumer attention and loyalty?• How does vendor product properties and positioning promote sustainable diets (e.g. regulation against high sugar foods/drinks; assuring kiosks have affordable and healthy snacks)?• What are the elements of messaging around food to raise awareness and catalyse consumer shifts? Are there incentives in place to assist this behavioural change? • Have existing impactful practices, innovations and technologies been assessed?• How is the scaling of existing impactful practices being planned/demonstrated and under which circumstances?• How can landscape and territorial approaches be identified and incentivized as mechanisms for scaling?• Are existing digital innovations for enhancing access, affordability, and nutritious diets being demonstrated (e.g. apps to identify diets/ nutrient deficits in marginalized groups, apps to link markets with consumers, monitor pests in farmers' fields, crowd source seasonal workers, citizen science, etc.)?A FRAMEWORK AND DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST FOR CONSIDERING ELEMENTS OF FOOD SYSTEMS TRANSFORMATION• Are nutrition sensitive and healthy diet approaches embedded from food production to consumption?• How are access and food safety dimensions being addressed across scales?• Are policies and tools being leveraged to enhance traceability and transparency?• What is the planning and investment trajectory for integrating greater renewable energy sources into food production, processing and transport?• Are there mechanisms in place for preparing foods that do not degrade the environment (e.g. sustainable charcoal production)?• How are spatial planning and zoning efforts, together with infrastructure investments and regulatory policies being conceived and applied in tandem with energy, transport and equitable access considerations? For example with:• Food deserts being mapped and prioritized to ensure healthy diets are available and affordable to marginalized areas, and• Public markets and informal marketing channels of farm products situated for accessibility through local transport, and provided sufficient resources?• How is value chain development influencing diversity of food sources and agrobiodiversity (e.g. tree products, nutrient dense rich diets)?• Are value chains being bundled and shortened?• Are there examples of reducing food waste and putting food waste to other uses (e.g. energy, nutrient cycling)?• What interventions are in place for reducing emissions across different value chains?• What food sources for the country are dependent on cross-boundary and inter-country trade and are there other options?• How have institutions (e.g. schools, prisons, etc.) transitioned to greater dependence locally-sourced, food-rich foods?Nutrition sensitive and healthy diet approaches and access to safe and nutritious foodA FRAMEWORK AND DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST FOR CONSIDERING ELEMENTS OF FOOD SYSTEMS TRANSFORMATION A FRAMEWORK AND DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST FOR CONSIDERING ELEMENTS OF FOOD SYSTEMS TRANSFORMATION• How are the predictable elements and uncertainties of climate impacts (heat, drought, floods, locusts, etc.) being integrated into planning for food system transformation?• Are strategies, policies and networks developed to reduce or prevent conflict over natural resources and food sources?• What potential is anticipated and incorporated to better foresee, prevent and manage pandemics (e.g. COVID-19, transboundary diseases)?• How is the food system transition explicitly linked to disaster risk reduction along the gradient of emergency response to development assistance in building resilience?• How can innovations be repurposed and reconfigured for rapid operationalization as part of crisis management (e.g. Lagos Food Bank Initiative) and what lessons can be translated from these?• How can food production within rural and urban areas enhance opportunities for employment and reduce migration?• Are plans in place to source emergency food and replenishment supplies from local sources and to make more accessible key productive inputs (e.g. indigenous seed sourcing, livestock/crop insurance, etc.) while protecting critical assets of the most vulnerable?Image: ©Georgina Smith (CIAT)"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3844524397.json b/main/part_2/3844524397.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf1dca1c4f6386378bd4d305e2d813344a3e8260 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3844524397.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e00383e63c39ad0b531472117fac13b6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/82f1774f-6a1e-4872-b2ea-79908fac6833/content","id":"747792215"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9f653494-dcbc-4032-b1a2-f7df1113dfb4","content":"We use a unique data set on matched tenant-landlord pairs in Malawi to compare decisions on smallholder plots that were rented versus those that were owneroperated. Controlling for household and rental-pair fixed effects, we found that some input use (e.g., hybrid maize seed) and soil fertility investments (e.g., manure, compost, minimum tillage) were higher on tenants' owner-operated plots than on their rented-in plots. Tenants were also less likely to use compost than their landlords. Landlords were less likely to rent out plots with fruit trees. Our results suggest that the expansion of farmland rental markets may exacerbate soil fertility maintenance concerns. (JEL D63, O12) Recent growth of farmland rental markets in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) can be understood as part of an ongoing structural transformation process in the region. In the foundational discussions of this process, Johnston and Kilby (1975) explain how higher returns to labor in nonfarm sectors induce an exodus of labor out of agriculture, with relatively more efficient farmers remaining in agriculture, expanding their capital and land endowments. This self-selection contributes to sectoral productivity gains, which are also driven by investments incentivized by increasing food demand and improving input market conditions. During this process, land transfers through rentals and sales should facilitate the reallocation of land resources to these more efficient farmers. 1 For example, functioning land rental markets should allow tenants to expand the cultivated area and bring more capital into the sector while potentially providing landlords with compensation for their land assets while they engage in pursuits outside of agriculture.Although most land cultivated by smallholders in SSA is managed in customary tenure systems where operators lack formal titles, recent evidence from the region suggests growth in land rental markets has been pronounced (Holden, Otsuka, and Place 2009;Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert 2016). Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert (2016) found that the percentage of households renting in land rose from 7.5% in 20027.5% in -20037.5% in to 15.4% in 20087.5% in -20097.5% in in Malawi and from 0.9% in 20017.5% in -20027.5% in to 3% in 20127.5% in -2013 in Zambia. This suggests that growth in rental market participation has been taking place even in environments where tenure rights are still largely customary and tenure security is sometimes ambiguous.At the same time, much of the region is facing a soil fertility crisis, with widespread soil nutrient losses occurring from year to year due to soil erosion and nutrient mining (Sanchez 2002). The concurrent trends of increasing land rental participation and decreasing soil fertility are worth scrutinizing because there is some evidence to suggest that rented plots receive lower soil fertility-enhancing investments than owner-cultivated plots. 2 For example, Gavian and Fafchamps (1996), Jacoby and Mansuri (2008), Lovo (2016), and Muraoka, Jin, and Jayne (2018) find that tenants are typically less likely to make soil-enhancing investments (such as animal manure application) on plots that they rent compared with plots they own and cultivate. This is a rational decision by tenants, given that rental contracts tend to be short-term, while the benefits of applying animal manure may take multiple years to be fully realized.The present study adds to the literature on soil fertility and land renting using a unique plot-level data set from Malawi, collected in 2016, that matched tenants with landlords and collected soil samples on rented and owneroperated plots. 3 Specifically, for each tenant we observed their rented-in plots (tenant's rented-in plots) and all their owner-operated plots (tenant's owner-operated plots). One unique aspect of this data set is that we also surveyed tenant's respective landlords, and thus we also observed the plots that the landlord did not rent out (landlord's owner-operated plots). The other novel feature of these data are that we took objective soil fertility measures including 2 In this article, a plot is a field that may contain one or more subplots. In our context, the rental decision actually occurs at the subplot level, because within a plot, one or more subplots may be rented while other subplots may be owner-cultivated. For simplicity, we refer to all fields as plots in this article. 3 One of the challenges associated with accurately estimating soil fertility and other effects of land rental markets is that most studies in the region (and all of the studies mentioned above) severely underreported the activities of landlords. In fact, a recent article by Deininger, Savastano, and Xia (2017) used nationally representative LSMS-ISA data from six countries in SSA collected within the past five years to show that total area rented out made up less than 50% of total area rented in all six countries (Ethiopia, Malawi, Niger, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda). Furthermore, rented-out land made up less than 6% of rented in land in three of the six countries (Malawi, Nigeria, and Uganda). In Malawi, Lunduka, Holden, and Øygard (2009) found only 8% of their sample were landlords, versus 20% who reported being tenants. The failure of most data sets to fully capture the landlord side of the rental market at best leaves out important details as to the landlords' intentions and at worst biases any results and conclusions drawn from such incomplete data sets. nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), potassium (K), pH, organic matter, silt, clay, and sand on tenants' largest owner-operated plot, their largest rented-in plot, along with the largest plot that was owner-operated by the landlord who owned the largest rented-in plot. This allowed us to expand our estimates of soil quality beyond the self-reported indicators used in most studies (usually if the soil on the plot was of good, fair, or poor quality).Using this unique data set, we answered the following research questions related to land rental markets in SSA, which have been understudied to date. First, did input use (e.g., labor for weeding, applying herbicides, applying inorganic fertilizer, and planting hybrid maize) and soil fertility investments (e.g., maize and legume intercropping, applying manure, applying green compost, using minimum tillage) differ on average among (1) a tenant's rented-in plots, (2) a tenant's owner-operated plots, and (3) the owner-operated plots of the tenant's landlord? As mentioned, much of the previous literature indicated that tenants were less likely to make longer-term soil fertility investments on their rented-in versus owneroperated plots. However, landlord information was missing from these studies, limiting our insights into managerial changes that occur when land was transferred from landlords to tenants. The present study seeks to understand how a tenant's input use and soil fertility investments compared to their landlord's investments on their own plot. To our knowledge, this has not been empirically tested before using a matched tenant-landlord data set.Second, we ask: did landlords rent out plots that they believe to be of lower or higher soil fertility ex ante than those they cultivated themselves, and how was this affected by the landlord's perception of tenure security on the plot? We might expect a landlord to have rented out land of lower soil fertility, ex ante, if he or she felt that such selection would not adversely affect rental receipts, or if he or she felt that renting out customary land may have increased the risk of having that land reallo cated to someone else by a village leader. However, tenants generally have been found to be wealthier and better educated than landlords in our study area (Ricker-Gilbert et al. 2019). This suggests potential power imbalances, possibly giving tenants an advantage over landlords when selecting which plots to rent in. We therefore ask: were land rental transfers more likely to be from landlords' higher or lower quality plots?By combining a matched tenant-landlord data set with objective and subjective measures of soil fertility, the present article makes an important contribution to the land rental market and land tenure literature in SSA. Several earlier studies used matched tenant-landlord data sets, but with different objectives. For example, Deininger, Ali, and Alemu (2013) used a matched sample to estimate the relative differences in Marshallian efficiency between share-cropped plots, plots rented at a fixed rate, and owner-operated plots in Ethiopia. Bellemare (2012) used a matched sample from Madagascar to estimate how a landlord's perception of his or her tenure security affects the choice of contract offered to tenants. Ghebru and Holden (2014) used a matched landlord-tenant sample from Ethiopia to assess bargaining power, efficiency, and distributional implications in tenant-landlord relationships. Ricker-Gilbert et al. (2019) use the same matched data set in Malawi as in this study to estimate efficiency and equity tradeoffs between tenants and landlords when land rental arrangements are made. Ours is the first to use a matched tenant-landlord sample to estimate models related to land renting, soil fertility, and other investments.Other studies have used objective measures of soil fertility to estimate how these measures relate to farmers' subjective self-assessment of soil fertility. Berazneva et al. (2018) with data from Kenya and Tanzania and Gourlay et al. (2017) with data from Ethiopia and Uganda find that the link between objective (laboratory test-based) assessments and subjective (farmer reported) assessments of soil fertility is weak and that farmers base their subjective assessment on a plot's crop yield. To our knowledge, the present article is the first to use objective measures of soil fertility to understand how landlords use (or do not use) such information to make land use decisions.To answer our research questions, we estimated two econometric models. In the first model, we regressed input use and soil fertility investments on land rental status for tenant's and landlord's plots, along with household and plot-level controls using linear models. The identification strategy for these models relied on the matched tenant-landlord sample, allowing us to use rental-pair fixed effects (FEs). Second, we estimated a linear probability model (LPM) for landlord households only and regress a binary variable equaling one if the landlord rented out a specific plot on the following factors: (1) objective soil fertility measures on the plot, (2) subjective soil fertility measures on the plot, (3) landlord perceptions of tenure security on the plot, and (4) investments made on the plot. In this model, our identification strategy was based on the fact that we have soil samples for multiple plots in the landlord household (rented out and owner cultivated). This allows us to use a within-household FE to control for unobserved factors associated with the landlord that may affect her rental decision. We also had a rich set of plot-level information in our data set that should control for the vast majority of remaining unobserved factors that might bias the coefficient estimates in our models. That being said, as with any observational study, our causal identification claims are made cautiously. Nonetheless, we believe that the analysis uncovers important relationships that are useful for smallholder agricultural policy in SSA.Briefly, our results indicate that tenants in our sample were more likely to use inputs like inorganic fertilizer on plots they rented in and plots they owner-cultivated themselves, compared with their landlords. However, tenants were less likely to make soil fertilityenhancing investments such as green compost on their rented-in plots compared with what their landlords did on their owner-operated plots. Tenants were significantly less likely to invest in applying animal manure, green compost, or minimum tillage on their rented-in plots compared with their owner-operated plots on average. Furthermore, it seems that the major factors affecting whether a landlord rented out a plot or cultivated it herself was whether there were observable assets such as fruit trees on the plot. Landlords were 49%-51% less likely to rent out a plot with a fruit tree on it, probably due to the income and nutrition that the fruit provided them.Our data and analysis are set in Malawi. The country officially recognizes three types of land tenure regimes: (1) the public tenure system, which includes public lands, national parks, and so on; (2) the private tenure system, which includes freehold, and leasehold land, where owners have titles and land can be bought, sold, and rented; and (3) the customary tenure system. The customary tenure system is by far the largest in Malawi in terms of landholding and number of people engaged (Lunduka, Holden, and Øygard 2009). Households who cultivate in the customary system have no formal title but have user rights granted by local chiefs. These land rights may be passed down from parents to children but are ultimately controlled by the chief. Land renting is not explicitly allowed in the customary system, but land rental participation has been growing in Malawi, as mentioned earlier, under the de facto approval of local leaders.Recent evidence suggests that land rental contracts in Malawi are almost entirely upfront cash-rent and short-term in nature, lasting one to two years on average (Ricker-Gilbert et al. 2019). In addition, tenants in Malawi have been found to be significantly wealthier than landlords along all dimensions of wealth other than land. This includes assets, savings, education, and available labor (Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert 2016;Ricker-Gilbert et al. 2019). Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert (2016) and Ricker-Gilbert et al. (2019) found evidence to support the notion that landlords rented out land because of the need for immediate cash or because they lacked the necessary labor, rather than to earn money that could facilitate engagement in other productive nonfarm activities.The literature clearly documents that land tenure insecurity is prevalent in many parts of Africa and in Malawi in particular. For example, in a survey of evidence across southern Africa, Mutangadura (2007) found that major causes of tenure insecurity included loss of land rights for minority groups, unclear or overlapping land rights, overcrowding, and land alienation into leasehold, among other reasons. In particular, the author found that the transfer of land from customary to leasehold for investors during the 1980s and 1990s and high and increasing population to land ratios were two of the major drivers of tenure insecurity in Malawi. A recent study in Malawi founds that tenure insecurity is widespread, with 22% of land users being concerned about losing their land (Deininger, Xia, and Holden 2019). Peters and Kambewa (2007) found that impending land reform legislation that would formalize tenure rights in the customary sector in Malawi led to increased tenure insecurity and competition for land among smallholders.Other studies from Malawi have found that people who lived in the home area of their spouses (e.g., a man residing in his wife's village) felt more tenure insecure (Lunduka, Holden and Øygard 2009;Matchaya 2009). Both Lunduka, Holden, and Øygard (2009) and Martchaya (2009) pointed out that particularly when a man resided in the wife's village and had no claim to the land other than through his wife, he was less likely to make longer-term investments in soil fertility. This was because he had no claim to the land if the marriage ended or his wife died.Previous literature also supported the view that farmers have greater incentives to maintain soil fertility on owner-operated plots than on rented-in plots. This has been attributed to lack of commitment from tenants because of the short-term nature of most land rental contracts (Jacoby and Mansuri 2008). Jacoby and Mansuri (2008) found that in Pakistan, tenant farmers were less likely to invest in a noncontractible soil fertility investment (e.g., applying animal manure) than on owner-operated plots. This was even the case on plots under fixed rent, where the tenant maintained all output, compared with share-cropped plots (where the tenant shared output with the landlord). In the African context, Gavian and Fafchamps (1996; for Niger), Lovo (2016; for Malawi) and Muraoka, Jin, and Jayne (2018; for Kenya) all found that rented-in plots were less likely to receive soil conservation or soil fertility-enhancing investments compared with owner-cultivated plots.The studies cited here provided important context that motivated the present work. We build on this literature by using a matched sample of tenants and landlords to answer questions about input use and investments made on a tenant's rented-in plot, their owneroperated plot, and a landlord's owner-operated plot. We also seek to understand how objective and subjective measures of soil fertility and other investments influence a landlord's decision to rent out a particular plot versus cultivate it for themself.Data in this study came from four districts in Malawi collected between April and June 2016, which immediately followed the 2015-2016 season. These districts were Lilongwe, Salima, and Nkhotakota in the central region, and Zomba in the southern region. Nkhotakota and Salima were selected to represent rural areas, and Lilongwe and Zomba were selected to represent peri-urban areas. These specific districts were selected because of their high incidence of land rental market activity according to the 2009-2010 nationally representative LSMS-IHS3 data. The total target sample size was 600, representing 150 farm households per sampled district. Since the IHS3 was only representative at the district level, after using those data to select districts, we contacted the District Agricultural Development Officer (DADO) as the entry point for the survey team. We used the DADO's local knowledge to identify Extension Planning Areas (EPAs) with high rental market activities in each district. In these EPAs, we randomly selected villages for our sample, choosing one village per EPA.Once a village was selected, the field supervisors along with the local extension officer undertook a targeted household listing exercise. Smallholder farm households participating in land renting were identified through a focus group discussion (FGD) with the village headman (local leader, also known as 'chief'), lead farmers, and members of village development committees and the vulnerability assessment committee. These individuals were considered to be knowledgeable about the history of the village and related land issues. On average, the FGD comprised about 10 people, of which half were women. Community-level issues regarding landownership, land availability and use, drivers of land renting, and prevailing farm gate prices of cash crops were discussed. The use of key informants to help identify respondents to answer questions about sensitive land-related issues has been used in many previous studies, including Bardhan and Mookherjee (2010); Macours, de Janvry, and Sadoulet (2010), Vranken et al. (2011), andMacours (2014).At the end of each FGD, we randomly sampled individual farming households from the village list of all households to serve as a sampling frame for our survey. 4 The village leaders helped us identify whether the randomly selected households were tenants, landlords, or autarkic (neither renting in or renting out land). Each sampled landlord was matched to his or her tenant as pairs for the household interviews. Thus, if a tenant household was sampled, its corresponding landlord was automatically sampled for the interview and vice versa. 5 Households were selected with replacement until a sample size of 10 matched pairs was reached (i.e., 20 households). Furthermore, 10 autarkic households were randomly selected from the list as control households. Thus, a total of 30 households were sampled per village.After cleaning the household data, our data set consisted of 948 unique plots from 169 tenant and 169 landlords who formed rental pairs. Of these 948 plots, 347 were tenant's rented-in plots, 266 were tenant's owneroperated plots, and 335 were landlord's owner-operated plots. Appendix Table A1 4 Village lists in Malawi were regarded as being accurate because they were used to determine how many input subsidy vouchers were given to a particular community and then to households in the community. Therefore, households had incentives to make sure they were included on the list.5 Tenants and landlords formed unique pairs in this analysis. If at tenant (landlord) had multiple landlords (tenants) then only the landlord (tenant) who owned (operated) the largest rented plot was found for interview. This was done for logistical purposes to keep the time and duration of the survey manageable. We took soil samples and GPS estimates of the area of surveyed plots according to the following criteria: the largest owner-operated plot cultivating maize or other annual crops for tenants and landlords. We took soil samples and GPS estimates of the area for the largest rented-in plot for each tenant and matched it to the landlord who had rented it out during that season.Our survey team included soil technicians from the Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR) soil lab. The technicians took two soil samples from each selected plot. Technicians took one sample from the topsoil (0-20 cm) and a second sample 20-40 cm below the surface (subsoil). Having a measure of quality for the topsoil and subsoil gave us a more robust estimate of the soil health on the plot. 6 After collection and labeling, the LUANAR soil lab analyzed the samples for the following measures in the topsoil and subsoil: nitrogen (%), phosphorus (ppm), pH, organic matter (%), silt (%), clay (%), and sand (%). These quantitative measures allowed us to measure soil quality broadly. In addition, we asked all households about their perceptions of the soil quality on their owned, rented-in, and rented-out plots. This enabled us to compare quantitative measurements of soil quality with farmers' assessments of soil quality. Furthermore, because we asked tenants and landlords about the soil quality on the rented plot that connected them, along with assessments of the soil quality on their respective owneroperated plots, we were able to observe how their perceptions about soil quality affected the land rental decision.Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics comparing means and standard deviations of key covariates used in the analysis for tenants and their landlord pairs. It is clear from the table that the population of tenants was different from the population of landlords in our sample. The means of these variables were statistically different between tenants and landlords at the 1% level for all variables other than number of household members (0.05 < p < 0.10), if a member of the household belonged to a village savings and loan association (0.01 < p < 0.05), and walking distance to the nearest extension officer (p > 0.10). Table 1 shows that tenants had on average 3.10 more years of education than landlords. Tenant households also had 0.47 more Ricker-Gilbert, Chamberlin, and Kanyamuka: Soil Quality Matched Tenant Landlord members on average than landlords, suggesting that tenant households had more available labor and more mouths to feed. Tenant household heads were also statistically younger than landlords on average by more than seven years and less likely to be female headed by 15 percentage points. Furthermore, tenants had a much higher average value of nonland assets at US$737 compared with US$117 for landlords, a difference of US$620. In fact, the only asset that landlords seemed to have statistically more of than tenants was prerental landholding, with the average landlord holding 1.88 ha, and the average tenant holding 0.83 ha. These statistics are consistent with other studies from southern Africa, which suggested that tenants on average have more nonland resources than do landlords (Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert 2016; Ricker-Gilbert et al. 2019). Our descriptive statistics provide prima facie evidence of tenants bringing education and assets into agriculture and using those resources to acquire land from less welloff landlord households. Table 2 compares the means in input usage and soil fertility investments on tenants' rented-in plots (column [1]), tenants' ownercultivated plots (column [2]), and landlords' owner-cultivated plots (column [3]). First, we found that tenants were statistically more likely to apply purchased inputs-particularly herbicide and inorganic fertilizer-than were landlords, on average. However, tenants did not apply these inputs at statistically different rates for their rented-in plots (column [1]) versus their owner-cultivated plots (column [2]). However, longer-term investments showed strong statistical differences between tenant's owner-operated and rented-in plots: rented-in plots received less animal manure, which is consistent with other empirical studies previously cited (e.g., Gavian and Fafchamps 1996;Jacoby and Mansuri 2008;Muraoka, Jin, and Jayne 2018). Although we do not know what investments landlords might have made on the rented-out plots had they not been rented out, it is nonetheless worth noting that in comparing the rented-in plots (operated by tenants) in column (1) with the landlord's owneroperated plots in column (3), we found that there were statistically lower levels of longerterm investments on the rented-in plots managed by tenants for manure application and green compost application compared with the landlord's owner-operated plots.Considering the evidence from Table 2, that soil fertility investment seemed to be lower on rented-in plots than on owner-operated plots, Table 3 provides some descriptive evidence on factors associated with which plots landlords decided to rent out versus cultivate themselves. The table shows objective measures and landlords' subjective perceptions of the soil quality characteristics of their plots. Interestingly, most quality measures between the landlords owned versus rented-out plots were not statistically different. Landlords reported that their owner-operated and rented-out plots are of good quality at similar rates (45% and 47%, respectively), and objective measures of soil acidity, organic matter, and phosphorous were not statistically different from one another. There was no statistically significant difference in tenure insecurity on the plots that the average landlord rented-out versus cultivated themselves. However, rented-out plots were 17 percentage points less likely to have fruit trees planted on them (25% of plots), compared with landlords' owner-operated plots (42% of plots) (p < 0.01). These findings suggest that the soil quality of plots did not strongly influence whether they were rented out, although the presence of fruit trees-as income-and sustenance-generating assetswas likely important.This article seeks to provide insights into the relationships between soil fertility, land rental markets, and tenant and landlord interactions in Malawi. In this section we discuss how we test the key research questions presented in the article.Question 1: How did input use and soil fertility investment decisions differ across owned versus rented plots operated by tenants and landlords? First, we want to estimate how land rental markets affect input use and soil fertility investments. The specific plot-level inputs that we model in the study are (1) the number of times the plot was weeded, (2) if the farmer applied herbicides on the plot, (3) kilograms of inorganic fertilizer applied per hectare to the plot, and (4) if the farmer planted hybrid maize as the main crop on the plot. We would expect all of these to increase land productivity (yields) in the current year, but they all come with extra costs over traditional low-input farming systems. We briefly discuss these variables and the associated benefits and costs below.The dependent variable number of times the plot was weeded is an important input on the plot because effective weed management is widely known to encourage crop growth and enhance the nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency (Snapp et al. 2014). At the same time, weeding incurs labor costs, which affect the optimal number of times a plot is weeded. For example, Kamanga et al. (2014) found that, on average, when inorganic fertilizer was valued at highly subsidized prices through the Farm Input Support Program in Malawi, the financial returns to labor were generally higher when farmers weed twice instead of once. Conversely, when they valued fertilizer at commercial prices, they found that weeding once or twice did not generated returns to labor that exceeded the prevailing informal hired-in (ganyu) labor wage rate of $0.53 per day. Appendix Table A2 shows that in our data the median wage rate per day (four hours of work) for ganyu labor during the 2015-2016 season in Malawi was MWK 528, roughly equivalent to US$0.75, and that 45% of the sample hired in some ganyu labor. In addition, 50% of the plots in our data were weeded once and 41% were weeded twice.Herbicides are a technology to control weeds that can help farmers maintain yields and reduce labor costs, compared to weeding by hand in traditional smallholder cultivation systems. Furthermore, applying herbicides are an important input in minimum or zero tillage methods that are recommended as sustainable agricultural practices that farmers are often encouraged to adopt (Giller et al. 2009, discussed more below). The challenge for many smallholders is that applying herbicides means that they have to incur an extra input cost, and access to herbicides is severely limited in many parts of Malawi. Table 2 indicates that 21% of tenant's rented-in plots had herbicides applied to them, 24% of tenants' owner-cultivated plots had herbicides applied, and just 9% of landlords' owner-cultivated plots had herbicides applied. We did not attempt to value or create a price for herbicide because of the difficulty in standardizing the different types and quantities that farmers use. Regardless, the vast majority of smallholders do not apply herbicide regardless of ownership or cultivation status and have to resort to using traditional hand weeding methods.Inorganic fertilizer is regarded as an important yield-increasing input in maize production in Malawi's nitrogen-deficient soils (Maize Productivity Task Force, Action Group I 1999).The government of Malawi recommends that farmers apply inorganic fertilizer two times to their maize. The most common fertilizer blends in Malawi are NPK, used as basal fertilizer applied during planting, and urea used as a top dressing to be applied once maize has sprouted. Appendix Table A2 indicates that 65% of our sample applied some amount of inorganic fertilizer during 2015-2016. The median farmer in the sample who used inorganic fertilizer applied 100 kg, which is the recommended amount for one acre. The median commercial fertilizer price was MWK 360/kg roughly equivalent to US$0.50. This costs out to about US$50 in total expenditure on inorganic fertilizer at commercial prices for people who purchase it in Malawi. This is a significant financial outlay for many smallholders.Hybrid maize varieties have the potential to increase yields compared with traditional varieties. Hybrid varieties are shorter in stature than traditional varieties, and more of the plant's energy is transferred into the grain rather than the stock of the plant. In addition, many of the hybrid varieties in Malawi are early maturing and drought resistant, allowing farmers to maintain yields in response to more sporadic rainfall and drought that has occurred in recent years, including during 2015-2016 when our data were collected. Snapp et al. (2014) found that on average yields on hybrid maize plots in Malawi were 1,373 kg/ha and 1,289 kg/ha on plots with local maize varieties.Although there are yield benefits to hybrid seeds, there are additional costs and other potential drawbacks. First, hybrid seeds lose productivity if they are recycled, and seed should be purchased every year, compared with traditional varieties that can be saved and reused in multiple seasons. Second, Malawians tend to prefer the taste of traditional maize grain and traditional maize grain stores better than hybrid maize, so the former often fetches a higher output price at market (Lunduka, Fisher, and Snapp 2012). Appendix Table A2 indicates that 65% of households in our sample acquired hybrid maize seed through the subsidy program or by purchasing them on the commercial market. The table also shows that the median farmer who purchased commercial hybrid maize seed bought 10 kg, recommended for planting one acre. The median cost of commercial maize seed was MWK 700/kg, roughly equal to US$1.00.The plot-level soil fertility investments modeled in this article include (a) intercropping maize and legumes, (b) applying animal manure, (c) applying green compost, and (d) using minimum tillage methods. These practices can maintain or enhance soil fertility, leading to increased yields, profits, and potentially better nutrition and food security. However, when implementing these practices, it takes time for the benefits to be translated into increased productivity. This is especially true with minimum tillage. These practices impose additional costs in terms of labor and the need for complimentary input use (e.g., herbicides to control weeds when using minimum tillage). We briefly discuss these soil fertility-enhancing investments below.The general principle of intercropping in smallholder production systems involves planting maize with legumes, including common bean, groundnuts, pigeon pea, or soybean. Legumes fix nitrogen in the soil, which offsets the nitrogen that maize takes out of it. Over time this can reduce nitrogen depletion and reduces (but certainly does not eliminate) the need for inorganic fertilizer. Bell et al. (2018) surveyed farmers in Malawi's Shire River valley and found that the main reasons they intercropped maize with legumes were to diversify their crop portfolio, reduce risk of maize crop failure, and have more (nutritious) food to eat and sell. The potential drawbacks to maize and legume intercropping are that maize production intensity and yields decline with lower planting densities, and planting multiple crops together on a plot increases the amount of labor needed. The other challenge is that legume seeds have to be available when farmers need them at planting, which can be a problem for smallholders in Malawi. Kanyamuka, Jumbe, and Ricker-Gilbert (2018) found that the main reason adopters of the legume pigeon pea in Central Malawi stopped growing the crop was because they did not have consistent access to fresh seed.Applying organic animal manure to plots is generally viewed as a sustainable agricultural intensification strategy that can be used as an agronomic compliment to inorganic fertilizers in smallholder production systems. Manure adds organic matter to the soil and improves its structure so that plants can use additional nitrogen from inorganic fertilizer more efficiently. However, it takes time for organic matter to accumulate in the soil and for soil structures to improve (Holden and Lunduka 2012). At the same time, organic manure is bulky and expensive to transport compared with inorganic fertilizer. Due to severe land constraints in Malawi, particularly in the southern part of the country, livestock density is low, making the benefits of organic manure difficult to access for limited resource smallholders.Green compost is created from crop residues, branches, and other greenery that smallholders apply to their fields to build up organic matter in their soils. Mulching green compost into the soil can improve its fertility over time, but like animal manure, it takes several years for the benefits to be realized (Van Hulst and Posthumus 2016). In addition, crop residues have competing uses such as livestock feed, composting takes time to create, and it is labor intensive and bulky to transport and spread (Giller et al. 2009).Minimum or zero tillage systems where farmers avoid creating deep disturbances in the soil is often advanced as being an important component of sustainable agricultural intensification strategies (Giller et al. 2009). Minimum tillage is also considered as a key component of conservation agriculture (Ngoma et al. 2021). Leaving the soil untouched rather than creating ridges saves labor and increases fertility of the soil over time. It can also help prevent erosion and water logging caused by poorly constructed ridges. However, ridging is a traditional weed control strategy in smallholder production systems, and minimum tillage is not effective unless farmers have access to herbicides to control weeds (Ward et al. 2018). Given the resource constraints of many smallholder farmers and the lack of access to herbicides, it is difficult for many of them to practice minimum tillage methods.Our first empirical model considers how these input use and soil fertility-enhancing investments differ among plots with three distinct types of ownership and cultivation status: (A) a tenant's rented-in plot that he or she cultivates, (B) the tenant's owner-operated plot, and (C) the landlord's owner-operated plot. We model these relationships on plot i cultivated by household j in rental-pair p as follows:where X represents an input or soil fertility investment decision on the plot. The variable R is a binary indicator, equal to one if the plot belongs to plot status A, namely, that it is rented-in and thus cultivated by the tenant, while 1 β represents the corresponding parameter to estimate. The variable T is also a binary indicator, equal to one if the plot belongs to plot status B, the plot is owner-operated by the tenant. The corresponding parameter to estimate is 2 β . The interpretation of the coefficient estimates 1 β and 2 β are important for answering how input use and investments differ across the types of plot ownership and cultivation status. The sign and magnitude of 1 β tests and compares how input use and investments differ on a tenant's rented-in plot (plot status A) compared to his or her landlord's owner-operated plot (plot status C). The sign and magnitude of 2 β tests and compares how input use and investments differ on a tenant's owner-operated plot and his or her landlord's owner-operated plot (status B versus status C). We can compare the differences between a tenant's rented-in plot and his or her owner-operated plot (status A versus status B) with an F-test of equality between 1 β and 2 β . 7 Given the short-term nature of rental contracts in Malawi, we might expect input used to be higher among tenants and on rented-in plots compared with landlord's owneroperated plots because the tenant operators seek short-term yield gains on the rented land. As mentioned, previous literature from Malawi indicated that tenants were also likely to have more savings and assets than landlords, so were likely more able to purchase fertilizer, seed, pesticides, and other inputs. At the same time, we hypothesize that soil fertility investments might be lower on rented-in plots than they are on owner-cultivated plots, either managed by tenants or landlords. This is because of the longer time horizon for these benefits to materialize and the likely shorter-term nature of the rental arrangements, as seen in previous literature (Gavian and Fafcahmps 1996;Muraoka, Jin, and Jayne 2018). The comparison of the coefficient estimates 1 β and 2 β to each other and to the control (landlord's owner-operated plots) gives a more complete picture of decisions made by land owners and land operators that has yet to be analyzed (to our knowledge).Equation [1] also includes a set of household-level controls that are denoted by the vector H. These include prerental landholding, which includes all land cultivated by the household (excluding rented-in land) in addition to land that will be rented out, and land that is fallowed, used as a woodlot or in pasture. 8 The vector H also includes number of household members, a proxy for available family labor, along with number of mouths to feed. In addition, gender of the household head, age of the household head, household savings, value of household assets, number of plots cultivated by the household, if someone the household is a member of a village savings and loan association, and walking distance to nearest extension office are all included as control variables in H. The corresponding parameter vector in equation [1] is denoted by 3 β . We also add one other plot-level variable: distance to the plot from the operator's home in walking minutes. This factor is denoted by D, with corresponding parameter 4 β .The rental-pair-specific unobserved FE that could influence the rental decision is denoted by c in equation [1]. This variable captures unobserved differences across tenant-landlord pairs that could influence unobservable factors, such as ability, motivation, and which plots have been rented in or out. Such unobservable variables include social and power dynamics and social connections within the rental partner pair (Bellemare 2012;Deininger, Ali, and Alemu 2013). We deal with this potential source of endogeneity by estimating equation [1] using rental-pair FE. Rental-pair FE controls for unobserved heterogeneity in the tenant-landlord pair, but as Bellemare ( 2012) pointed out, it does not control for selection into rental status as a tenant or landlord. Rather, the results of this analysis are consistent for measuring effects conditional on being engaged in the land rental market as a tenant or a landlord. The results are not fully generalizable to the broader population of smallholders in Malawi but are relevant for people who are already either tenants or landlords. We argue that this is the primary population of interest here because some people in the smallholder population are unlikely to ever engage in land renting. Ultimately, we recognize that even with a rich set of controls and pair-specific FEs, we cannot assume full causality of our results. This is the case with any study using observational data, but we believe our analysis uncovers important relationships that are useful for smallholder agricultural policy in SSA.The plot and household specific error term is represented by , which is assumed to be uncorrelated with the observable covariates in equation 1 after controlling for rental-pair FE.Question 2: How do subjective and objective measures of soil fertility along with investments affect a landlord's rental decision? To answer this question, we explicitly model the landlord household j's rental decision for plot i at the beginning of the agricultural season as a function of the following:where Y is equal to one if the landlord chooses to rent out the plot and zero if she chooses to cultivate it herself. The first key covariate to consider in our analysis is denoted by S, which is equal to one if the household believes that the soil fertility on plot i is of good or very good quality and zero otherwise. The corresponding parameter to estimate is denoted by 1 α . The sign and statistical significance tests whether a landlord rents out the plot that she perceives to be of better or worse soil fertility. The variable I in equation [2] represents the binary indicator for whether there is a fruit tree on the plot. This variable is meant to proxy for the investment decisions made in previous years on the plot that may affect household income or the plot's soil fertility in the future. The fruit that the trees bear serves as a resource that the household can consume or sell, with 2 α as the corresponding parameter.This variable tests whether landlords are more or less likely to rent out the plots that have received an investment previously. Appendix Table A2 shows that 58% of households have ever purchased a fruit tree; conditional on purchasing a tree, five was the median number of trees purchased and six was the mean number purchased. The median fruit tree value was MWK 2,000 per tree (US$2.85), while the mean was MWK 3,779 (US$5.40).One may wonder if a fruit tree on a rented plot could have been planted by a tenant in the past rather than by the landlord. There is no way to rule this out for certain. However, it seems unlikely because most of the renting in this context is very short term, as evidenced in the previous literature (Lunduka, Holden, and Øygard 2009;Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert 2016;Ricker-Gilbert et al. 2019). Furthermore, Appendix Table A3 shows that that 78% of rented plots in our data were rented out for two years or less over the past five years. Because fruit trees are a relatively fixed investment, this suggests that any trees planted on rented-out plots were likely planted by the owning landlord sometime in the past. 9 The vector Q represents the unobservable, quantitative soil fertility measures on the plot's top soil (0-20 cm). These include the level of phosphorus measured in parts per million (ppm), level of organic matter in percent, and if the soil is acidic with pH below 5.2. The corresponding parameter vector is 3 α . These are important measures for testing the extent to which landlords are aware of objective soil fertility on the plot and how this may affect their rental decisions.We also include the variable C in equation [2] to provide us with a measure of how tenure insecurity affects the decision to rent. The variable is equal to one if the landlord believed that someone was likely to make a tenure claim against his or her plot. The corresponding parameter is 4 α . The error term in equation [2] has two components. First, the landlord-specific unobserved effect (FE) is denoted by a, while v denotes the household and plot-specific error.The identification strategy used to deal with correlation between the error term and observed covariates in equation [2] is similar to equation [1], as we are primarily concerned with omitted variable bias. We deal with this first by adding the plot-level controls as mentioned above, thus removing them as omitted variables in the model.Second, because we have multiple plots per household, we are able to use landlord FE to remove the individual landlord-specific error term, a, from equation [1]. Doing so removes demographic characteristics of the landlord, such as age, education, and gender, as those are constant for an individual landlord. The plot-specific error, v, is assumed to be uncorrelated with the covariates in equation [2], conditional on the observed covariates and a.Most of the dependent variables in the models presented in this article are binary responses, taking on a zero or one value (the only exceptions are number of times the plot was weeded and kilograms of inorganic fertilizer applied per hectare). We estimate these linearly using rental-pair FE as discussed earlier. As such, the binary dependent variables in these equations are estimated as an LPM. LPM has the advantage over a nonlinear estimator such as probit because it provides easy to interpret coefficients. LPM also allows us to use tenant-landlord pair FE, which would be biased in probit estimation, due to the incidental parameters problem (Wooldridge 2010). We cluster the standard errors of our estimates at the rental-pair level to deal with concerns about heteroskedasticity and serial correlation when using the LPM. β , and (3) his or her landlord's owner-operated plot(s) as the base for comparison. These models were estimated linearly via rental-pair FE to control for unobservable factors in the relationship between tenants and landlord pairs. We see that there was no statistical difference among ownership status and management of the plot for number of times the plot was weeded in column (1). However, in column (2), tenants were 8 percentage points more likely to apply herbicide on their owner-cultivated plot than were landlords on their owner-cultivated plot (p < 0.10). This was nearly double the 9% of landlords who applied herbicides to their owner-cultivated plots (as seen in Table 2). The same relationship held in column (3) for kilograms of inorganic fertilizer applied per hectare. Tenants applied 78 kg per ha more fertilizer on average on plots they owner-operated, compared with their landlords' owner-operated plots (p < 0.01). This was a substantial 51% increase over the mean fertilizer application on a landlord's plot of 152 kg per ha (as seen in Table 2). Tenants also applied nearly 61 kg more inorganic fertilizer per ha on rented-in plots than their landlords did on their owner-operated plots on average (p < 0.05). This was equivalent to a 40% increase in fertilizer application over their landlord's owner-operated plot(s) on average. However, we did not observe statistically significant differences between tenant-operated plots (both rented-in or owner-operated) and landlords' owner-operated plots in terms of number of times the plot was weeded or whether hybrid maize was the main crop. To evaluate differences between input usage by tenants on their owned versus rented-in plots, we computed F-tests comparing 1 β and 2 β for each model. The only significant difference was in column (4) (hybrid maize usage): tenants were 11 percentage points more likely to plant hybrid maize on their owned-plot than on their rented-in plots on average. (Appendix Table A4 shows the main crops that were planted on plots based on ownership and cultivation status.) One revealing insight from Appendix Table A4 is that tenants grew groundnuts on nearly 30% of rented-in plots, compared with groundnuts being grown on only 17% of tenants' owner-cultivated plots and 19% of landlords' plots. This may suggest that tenants focused on planting maize as a food security crop on their owned plots but were more likely to use the rented-in plots to expand their area cultivated into cash crops like groundnuts. Table 5 presents the results for factors affecting plot-level soil fertility investments among a tenant's rented-in plot(s) ( 1 β ) a tenant's owner-operated plot(s) ( 2 β ), and his or her landlord's owner-operated plot(s) (control). As in Table 4, the models in Table 5 were estimated linearly via rental-pair FE. For the most part, there are no statistically significant differences in the probability of longer-term investments for tenants' rented-in and owner-operated plots compared with their landlords' owner-cultivated plots. The only significant exception is that, on average, rented-in plots were 7 percentage points less likely to receive green compost by a tenant operator, compared with a landlord's green compost usage on their owner-operated fields. This result makes sense given the time, labor, and crop residues required to generate green compost: because crop residues have alternative uses and land renting is short-term, tenants may have greater incentives to apply such resources on their own plots, where lagged benefits will not be lost.The comparisons of tenant investments on rented-in versus his or her owner-cultivated plots were more striking ( 1 β = 2 β ). The F-tests at the bottom of columns (2), (3), and (4) Note: Standard errors are in parentheses. Models include a constant and district-level FEs. Districts are not completely collinear with the rental-pair location because we found four cases of tenants and landlord pairs residing in different districts. The number of observations = 948, with 169 matched tenant-landlord pairs; 1 indicated that tenants were much less likely to use animal manure, green compost, and minimum tillage practices on their rented-in plots than they were on their owner-operated plots by 11, 5, and 5 percentage points on average, respectively. These changes were very different from the means on tenant's owner-cultivated plots, representing a 42% decline in the probability of applying animal manure, a 45% decline in the probability of using green compost, and a 35% decline in the probability of using green compost, albeit from a relatively low base (as seen in Table 2).Regardless, these results were all in line with our expectations, and consistent with the previous literature about the inability of tenants to capture lagged returns under short-term tenancy arrangements (Gavian and Fafchamps 1996;Jacoby and Mansuri 2008;Lovo 2016;Muraoka, Jin, and Jayne 2018). As mentioned, these soil fertility-enhancing investments take time to generate returns. Furthermore, organic animal manure requires access to animals and labor; green compost requires access to labor and crop residues, which have alternative uses; and minimum tillage is enabled by herbicide application, which is an added input cost and access is very limited for many smallholders in Malawi. Obviously, if tenants have to make decisions about where to incur these costs to obtain soil fertility benefits from these investments, they generally choose to do so on their own plots rather than the rented ones. As such, it would seem that tenants in our sample were not investing in their rented-in plots and may in fact have been mining the soil nutrients on these plots. We also know that tenants in our sample were wealthier than landlords on average in terms of wealth, savings, and education. These findings raise the question that we address in Table 6: what factors affected the landlord's choice of which plot to rent out and which to retain for her own cultivation?Table 6 presents the results of the model that estimated factors associated with which plot(s) a landlord decided to rent out, estimated via landlord-FE LPM. Columns (1)-( 4) show the base model presented in equation [2] with alternative sets of explanatory factors in each column, while the specification in column (5) includes all factors simultaneously. We see from these results that a landlord's perception of the soil quality on the plot did not significantly affect his or her decision to rent out the plot. However, in columns (3) and ( 5), we see that plots with fruit trees on them were 49-51 percentage points less likely to be rented out, on average (p < 0.01). This suggests that landlords viewed fruit trees as important productive assets and were reluctant to part with plots that had such trees. 10 We also found evidence in column (2) that plots with higher soil organic matter were less likely to be rented out on average, with results approaching statistical significance (0.10 < p < 0.11).Interestingly, we found marginally significant evidence that landlords who felt insecure about their tenure claim to a plot were 29-33 percentage points more likely to rent it out on average than those who did not (0.05 < p < 0.10 in column [5]). One possible interpretation of this result is that if landlords were labor or capital constrained, and unable to farm all the land in their possession, they may have perceived a greater risk of appropriation/reallo cation from leaving the land idle rather than letting a tenant cultivate it. 11 Another possibility is that, facing some uncertainty about eventual reallocation by traditional authorities, a landlord would rather earn 10 This view is consistent with other studies that find that fruit trees on farms make important contributions to household consumption and income (Miller, Muñoz-Mora, and Christiaensen 2017). An alternative view is that fruit trees planted by the landlord may strengthen security of a landlord's claims to land and thus make renting out less subject to reallocation by customary authorities. This view does not seem to be supported by our results. One reason underlying this may have to do with the uncertain age of the fruit trees in question, which may well predate the current landlord's association with the plot.11 Most landlords in our sample said that they were motivated to rent out land by the need for cash, but this does not preclude the possibility that they were also more likely to rent out land they were unable to cultivate themselves. The lack of labor and capital with which to farm has been a well-documented motivation for renting out land, particularly for female-headed households, elsewhere in the region (e.g., Holden and Ghebru 2016;Holden, Deininger, andGhebru 2008, 2011 for Ethiopia). Furthermore, in Malawi, the relative scarcity of labor and capital resources, compared with landholding, was found to be positively associated with the likelihood of renting out land (Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert 2016). Nonetheless, we are unable to say whether a plot would have been cultivated by a landlord if she or he had not rented that plot out. income on a risky asset while such an opportunity remains available.We investigated this finding further by estimating a plot-level model of factors affecting the landlord's perception of insecurity across their plots. The model regressed a binary variable for insecurity (i.e., the expressed concern by the respondent that someone will challenge his or her tenure claim) on (1) distance from the home to the plot, (2) his or her subjective views on soil quality and soil color, (3) if the plot was obtained from the local chief (as opposed to inheriting it directly from a parent, or purchasing it with title), and (4) if the male in the household was the main operator of the plot. The estimation results of this model are shown in Appendix Table A5. They indicate that obtaining the plot from a chief had a marginally significant effect on landlord's perception of insecurity about the plot at the 10% level of significance. In fact, the coefficient estimate suggests that the average household who obtained the plot from the chief was 29%-31% more likely to feel insecure about their claim to it. This finding suggests that ceteris paribus when smallholders obtain plots directly from chiefs, rather than through inheritance claims or direct purchases, they are more likely to perceive a risk of having that land taken away. This may reflect that land obtained directly from chiefs was prob ably acquired more recently and could be more easily taken away, relative to land that has been inherited and controlled by the farmer's family for multiple generations.For each model specification results reported in Tables 4-6, we also generated a number of alternative specifications, with the objective of evaluating the robustness of our results. In Appendix Tables A6 and A7, we ran parsimonious models with and without pair-wise FE, as well as a specification with a full set of covariates but without the pair-wise FE. In Appendix Table A8 we show specifications that were analogous to the main landlord results in Table 6, but without landlord FE. Across the specifications in the appendixes, the signs were all the same and coefficients were generally of similar magnitude to our main results. Fewer coefficients were statistically significant in Tables 4-6 than they were in the appendixes, suggesting that the FE estimators with additional controls provided the most conservative estimates, justifying why we used them in our main analysis. Overall, our analytical conclusions did not change substantively when we added these robustness checks.Our findings are relevant to the contemporary policy debate on how best to facilitate sustainable intensification in SSA (Sanchez 2002;van Ittersum et al. 2016;Holden 2018;Jayne et al. 2019). Results suggest that the answer to this question is not simply a technological one but one that addresses how the incentives for soil fertility investments are conditioned by land institutions, including farmland rental markets. Population is growing rapidly in the region against a relatively fixed land base, and land rental markets are responding. Such markets are the most feasible way for land resources to be quickly and efficiently reallocated to those who wish to expand their cultivated area and to invest management and financial resources in the sector. However, our results suggest that in the absence of other interventions, the de facto expansion of rental markets in SSA will likely incur negative effects on soil fertility, even if sectoral productivity increases in the shorter term. This has implications for the long-run fertility and health of African soil, which are already in crisis (Drechsel et al. 2001;Sanchez 2002). The answer, surely, is not to restrict rental market development, which does appear to bring about important positive productivity gains (Holden, Otsuka, and Place 2009;Jin and Jayne 2013;Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert 2016), but to facilitate tenure security for landlords, which may facilitate longerterm rental arrangements, creating greater incentives for fertility investments by tenants. In addition, it may be possible to design contracts that incentivize longer-term investments directly. For example, in a study of land rental markets in the Czech Republic, Sklenicka et al. (2015) found that while owner-operators were more likely than tenants to invest in soil erosion control, tenants could be incentivized through subsidies to do so if an effective verification and payment system was put in place. This could perhaps be feasible in our context as we found evidence that tenants were more likely to invest in the soil fertility for their owner-operated plots than for their rented plots. This suggests that they know the benefits of soil fertility-enhancing measures but are not incentivized to care about them on their rented-in plots. Additional research may clarify the responsiveness of rental arrangements (and investments made in such rental contexts) to different levels of tenure security and contract choices.Nonetheless, on the basis of our results, we consider some simple benefit-cost calculations on the basis of expected input intensification by landlords in the short-run versus the costs of decreased soil fertility in the longer run. Column (3) in Table 4 indicated that on average, moving land from landlords to tenants added an extra 61 kg per ha to Malawi's soil. If we assume a maize to fertilizer response rate of 4:1 (Jayne and Rashid 2013), we obtain a return of an extra 244 kg of maize per ha compared with land managed by landlords. The nationally representative Fourth Integrated Household Survey of Malawi indicates that 13% of plots and 385,000 ha of land were rented during the 2015-2016 season. This suggests that an extra 23,500 tons of fertilizer was added to Malawi's soils through land renting, leading to an additional 94,000 tons of maize produced (assuming a 4:1 fertilizer to maize response ratio). If we assume a maize grain price at harvest of $250 per ton, then the total revenue from the additional production would be US$23.5 million in 2015-2016. Next the benefits of increased fertilizer and maize production need to be assessed against the cost of fertilizer and labor requirements of applying more fertilizer. In this study we found the average hired labor price was about US$1.40 a day, and we assumed it takes an extra day to apply 61 additional kilograms of fertilizer per hectare. We found fertilizer to be priced at $0.71 per kg on average in our data. As such the total cost of this increased production would be $0.71*61 kg + $1.40 = $45 per ha * 385,000 rented ha for a total cost of $17.33 million. This suggests that renting land generated a current year benefit/cost ratio of 1.36 (benefits of $23.5 million/costs of $17.33 million) on average in 2015-2016. The cost of renting land is considered to be a transfer from tenants to landlords, and the net benefits need to be weighed against the potential longer-term soil fertility decline from renting land, as evidenced by tenants being 7 percentage points less likely to apply green compost to rented-in plots than their landlords on average (Table 5). More detailed estimates of the longer-term costs of soil fertility declines under reduced soil fertility investments is beyond the scope of our analysis but certainly merits further study.This study used a unique data set on matched tenant-landlord pairs from four districts in Malawi to compare input use and soil fertility investment decisions among tenants' rented-in plots, tenants' owner-operated plots, and the owner-operated plots of their landlords. To our knowledge, this is the first study to do so, giving us greater insights into how tenant and landlord production decisions are affected by rental market participation. The latter has been particularly weak in the empirical literature because of low rates of observation of landlords relative to tenants in survey data (Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert 2016;Deininger, Xia, and Holden 2017). We also investigated the factors that affect landlords' decisions on which plots to rent out and which to cultivate herself at the start of the season. Since we have multiple plots per household and per rental pair, we use rental-pair and household FEs to identify our results.Our findings were consistent with earlier studies from Malawi, which indicated that tenants were generally wealthier than landlords on all dimensions besides prerental landholding; that is, assets, savings and education (Chamberlin and Ricker-Gilbert 2016;Ricker-Gilbert et al. 2019). Tenants in our sample were more likely to apply annual inputs like herbicide and inorganic fertilizer on their owner-operated plots compared with landlords. However, tenants were less likely to make soil fertility-enhancing investments such as applying green compost on their rented-in plots, compared with their landlords. In addition, tenants were less likely to apply organic manure, green compost, or minimum tillage on rented-in plots than they were on their owner-cultivated plots. Previous studies have found that tenants were more likely to make longer-term soil conservation/ enhancement investments on owner-operated plots relative to rented-in plots (Gavian and Fafchamps 1996;Jacoby and Mansuri 2008;Lovo 2016;Muraoka, Jin, and Jayne 2018). Our results add to this literature by comparing a variety of soil fertility investments on tenants' rented-in plots, their owner-operated plots, and their landlord's owner-operated plots, using our matched sample. Furthermore, it seemed that the major factor affecting whether a landlord rented out a plot was the presence of readily observable endowments, as landlords were 49-51 percentage points less likely to rent out a plot with fruit trees on it.Our overarching interest has been to generate policy-relevant insights about the effects of rental market participation on soil fertility investments through a more comprehensive assessment of landlord and tenant sides of the market than has been done to date. Our comparison of rented and unrented plots operated by tenants is consistent with earlier studies suggesting that soil fertility investments are lower in rented-in plots compared with tenant's owner-operated plots. However, our comparison of rented out versus landlord operated plots-which has largely been unexamined in prior literature-offers tentative evidence of differences in soil fertility management, primarily via lower use of green compost but not through the other investments evaluated. More empirical work, covering larger geographical diversity, will help clarify the net soil fertility management implications of expanding farmland rental markets in the longer term. The short-term gains from higher expected fertilizer investments by wealthier tenant farmers appear to be important, but figuring out how to incentivize greater fertility investments in farming systems that are increasingly defined by rental transactions is essential for sustainable productivity increases in the region. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3855882660.json b/main/part_2/3855882660.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e502398c05dc40caae5bd2d73fc126c54d0977f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3855882660.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"fecddcd0ed6ae798952df31aef422894","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/26c9c7bf-9608-41cd-9b6d-2c8365835e52/retrieve","id":"932910456"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4c9f51b8-8024-485e-a5cf-5d0deac16e68","content":"1 Introduction La gestion durable des systèmes agro pastoraux, fait face à divers défis, tels que le développement des filières, l'amélioration de la gestion des ressources naturelles, l'aménagement du territoire, l'élevage, etc. Ceux-ci ne dépendent pas seulement des technologies, mais largement des institutions, marchés et politiques, qui sont en constante évolution. La production des connaissances en soi n'est pas suffisante pour répondre à ces défis, il exige l'innovation, un processus social par lequel le savoir est créé, diffusé, accessible, adapté et, plus important, mis en application, de façon économique et sociale, et implique plusieurs intervenants provenant des communautés, du gouvernement, des ONG, la recherche et le secteur privé. Bien que cette approche puisse nécessiter plus de temps et une facilitation intensive, les résultats sont susceptibles d'être plus durables et de plus grande envergure.Les acteurs au niveau du site mènent des activités telles que la commercialisation du bétail, la gestion des ressources naturelles, l'aménagement du territoire, activités qui se déroulent dans un environnement en constante évolution, le degré auquel les acteurs sont en mesure de répondre aux changements dépend de leurs capacités individuelles / organisationnelles (y compris ressources, compétences, attitudes, etc.), la culture institutionnelle/organisationnelle, la nature des politiques et la disponibilité des infrastructures d'appui (technique et humain).Une façon de stimuler l'innovation est de créer des conditions pour différents types d'acteurs d'interagir et de travailler conjointement. Une plateforme d'innovation (PI) est un mécanisme visant à renforcer les capacités de communication et d'innovation entre les acteurs mutuellement dépendants, en améliorant les interactions, la coordination et la cohérence entre tous les acteurs pour faciliter l'apprentissage et contribuer à la production et l'utilisation des connaissances. Basé sur un système d'innovation optique, une plateforme d'innovation va au-delà de la triade habituelle des agriculteurs, la vulgarisation et les instituts de recherche, et implique un plus large groupe de parties prenantes pour traiter des contraintes institutionnelles. Il est prévu de réunir les différents acteurs pour le partage des expériences, des connaissances, des compétences, des idées et des ressources afin de contribuer à la résolution des problèmes et à l'exploitation des opportunités d'intérêt commun.PROGEBE et MOBIOM vont oeuvrer pour la promotion de la formation et le fonctionnement d'une plate-forme d'innovation au niveau de la commune de Yorobougoula afin d'améliorer l'interaction, la communication, l'échange d'informations entre les acteurs concernés et d'améliorer leur capacité et de la coordination.Le but de la création des plateformes d'innovation au niveau du site est d'habiliter les communautés locales et les acteurs d'analyser leurs propres contraintes/faiblesses et les opportunités/forces et de renforcer leurs capacités à innover à travers un meilleur accès aux connaissances existantes et nouvelles, aux informations et services qui améliorent la performance de leurs entreprises. Elles sont envisagées pour être orientées vers des fora d'apprentissage pour la gestion durable du système agro pastoral. Améliorer la performance du système agro pastoral (grâce à une meilleure production, une meilleure gestion et un meilleur marketing) en créant des liens entre les différents acteurs (agriculteurs, prestataires publics et privés de services, commerçants, transformateurs) qui pourraient améliorer l'accès aux intrants, aux services, aux informations, aux connaissances et aux marchés;  Améliorer la coordination et la synergie des activités des divers acteurs pour une gestion durable du système agro pastoral ;  Promouvoir les capacités techniques, organisationnelles et institutionnelles (gouvernance locale) au niveau du site en matière de conservation, de production et de commercialisation pour la gestion durable du système agro pastoral. L'attention a été attirée sur les intérêts du renforcement des capacités des acteurs, le caractère non permanent de l'appartenance à la plateforme, la nécessité de l'information et de la sensibilisation des membres, les avantages de l'implication du secteur privé, des organisations communautaires, la nécessité de l'utilisation des supports audio visuels et écrits.Les facilitateurs ont illustré les points abordés à l'aide d'exemples des cas de réussite au Mali ou en Ouganda.Les discussions ont surtout porté sur :  le système de gouvernance de la plateforme : les facilitateurs affirment que le système de gouvernance doit être élaboré au sein de la plateforme pour assurer son bon fonctionnement ;  le renforcement des capacités : Il est indispensable pour la réussite et la durabilité du système. Dans la PI il y a toujours des besoins en formation qui apparaissent, il faut les identifier et les planifier. La reconnaissance officielle (document officiel) : ces genres de lourdeurs administratives sont à éviter car elles peuvent nuire au fonctionnement de la plate forme ;  la taille/couverture zonale de la plateforme : il est préférable de commencer par une plateforme de petite taille qui peut s'agrandir que de commencer par une plate forme de grande taille pas certainement viable ;  les parties prenantes : Il faut identifier les vrais acteurs et éviter de prendre les acteurs à titre figuratif ou prestigieux.  La possibilité d'utiliser le comité de pilotage de Madina Diassa comme base pour la plateforme. Le comité de pilotage est composé de beaucoup d'acteurs et fonctionne. Les facilitateurs ont affirmé que le comité de pilotage peut être utilisé comme base.Information sensibilisation des acteurs dans le cadre de la mise en place des plateformes d'innovation Tenue de la 1 ère réunion à Yorobougoula.L'atelier a regroupé les représentants des agro éleveurs, des services techniques, de la Recherche, des ONG, de la caisse de micro crédit, du PROGEBE et de MOBIOM.Identification des acteurs, des contraintes et de l'enjeu central : la filière petits ruminants a été identifiée comme étant la filière la plus porteuse.-Manque de produits vétérinaires.-Manque d'eau en saison sèche pour l'abreuvement du cheptel -Manque de matériels et équipements -Inorganisation du marché.La filière « petits ruminants » est ressortie comme filière porteuse.Les différentes espèces fourragères utilisées par les agro éleveurs dans le cadre de l'alimentation du cheptel sont : les fanes d'arachide et de niébé, la paille de riz, le son de maïs.Méthodologie adoptée pour la mise en place de la plateforme d'innovation :  Identification de chaque participant dans le cadre d'une filière  Constitution de groupes de travail  Expression des attentes des participants dans la plateforme  Définition des rôles au sein de la plateforme  Trouver un nom pour la plateforme qui fait référence aux petits ruminants et aux cultures fourragères  Election du bureau de la plateforme  Elaboration du plan d'action 3Nom de la plateforme : Plateforme pour la promotion de l'agriculture et de l'élevage « Espoir de la communauté » Les objectifs de la plateforme sont de promouvoir la production et la commercialisation des petits ruminants, des céréales et légumineuses, par l'adoption des innovations qui favorisent l'intégration durable des systèmes agropastoraux dans la communauté.Communiqué final de la mise en place officielle de la plateforme \"faso jigiya 4 \" de Yorobougoula (site de Madina Diassa) Objectif général de plateformeElle a consisté à :  L'identification des différents acteurs qui auraient un intérêt quelconque sur les chaines de valeur relatives au petit ruminant, légumineuses (arachide et niébé), céréales (riz) et espèces arbustives fourragères et ligneuses.  Définition des rôles, attentes et besoins en formation des différents acteurs La plateforme devra essentiellement susciter auprès des différents acteurs, un engouement certain en vue d'oeuvrer à la promotion et la commercialisation du petit ruminant, légumineuses et céréales à travers l'adoption des innovations qui concourent à l'intégration durable des systèmes agro-sylvopastoraux dans la communauté. Le secteur le plus promoteur ici est celui de l'arachide, le niébé, le riz, les espèces arbustives fourragères et le petit ruminant.Et ceci devra être fait dans un cadre de concertation désigné plateforme d'innovation. Plateforme qui, de façon collégiale et consensuelle a été dénommée « Faso Jigiya » ou encore « L'espoir de la communauté ». Au total 14 types d'acteurs étaient représentés avec une prépondérance des ONG et agro éleveurs (31% de membres des ONG et 21% de la communauté des agro éleveurs). Le reste étant composés de la recherche et développement, éleveurs, consommateurs, institution de micro finance, secteur privé et politique entre autres.Il a été par la suite procédé a la définition des rôles et attentes des différents acteurs. Le tableau cidessous présente la synthèse des résultats des discussions. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3872002528.json b/main/part_2/3872002528.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d9ec0699182b4242806f74a2d3b29ed2230407f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3872002528.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0c6dd56b8e5c43bee775ef3ed1cb7e5c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/04083c2a-eb47-4b48-93d5-7b62ce7036a2/content","id":"1376527721"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"55f962e8-2f97-4262-a904-42d5870de7c5","content":" EIAR (federal) & RARIs in 8 RCs  Major maize-legume growing agro-ecologies (semi-arid, humid, sub-humid, etc.)  CGS: 3 major maize-legume producing states  The zones host 33% maize growers 44% maize yield • CGS: 3 major maize legume producing regional states in 7 zone• Financial benefit analysis shows that conventional and conservation agriculture practices of maize-legume intercropping followed by sole maize with fertilizer gave higher margins.• Figures are in terms of benefit cost ratio from unit area (ha)Impact of agronomic practices on maize varieties performance and net maize income in Ethiopia Means of grain yield (kg/ha) for maize and first belg beans in permanent plots in Loka-Abaya and Boricha district and southern Ethiopia• With respect to drought risk reduction, CA was found to be more resilient during moisture stress seasons (2012 and 2015)• Common bean rotation and intercropping with maize under CA gave consistently higher yield than a similar cropping system under CP in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia.• Yield is 4.4 to 7.0 t/ha and 2.6 to 3.1 t/haAmong CA practices, crop diversification has dual impacts using large (5740) set of data  Enhances productivity, and  reduces the downside risk in maize production on plots planted to improved maize and/or chemical fertilizer (Moti and Pawel, 2017).• Soil bulk density reduction was observed Result of experiments in southern of Ethiopia show increase in the of soil macrofauna between CA and CP. Greater population of termites, ants, millipedes, and centipedes due to residue retention and intercropping "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3881864580.json b/main/part_2/3881864580.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ffe4ecc7ad9800e61ce35a57643edd458c6da41 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3881864580.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b0680f860aec8e41d0a0e5363de7f4fe","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6bc3e236-b93a-48ec-9a39-244802e4adbb/retrieve","id":"-1913023862"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e585a5f8-10c1-4281-b51c-4825d306db54","content":"This policy brief summarizes key learnings derived from the initial phase of a project carried out by the Alliance of Biodiversity and CIAT and Solidaridad in the Brazilian Amazon. The project as part of the Agroecological TRANSITIONS program's Inclusive Digital Tools (ATDT) project. ATDT aims to promote innovations related to digital tools that enhance inclusiveness, integrate climate change resilience and mitigation with agroecological aims, and enable climateinformed agroecological transitions at scale. Drawing insights from this experience, this brief shares reflections on the success factors and dilemmas encountered, as well as practical solutions to overcome them.Agricultural extension is centered on the idea of applying scientific research to agricultural practices through farmer education, aiming to empower farmers in improving their management, production, and marketing practices (Leite et al., 2021). Agricultural extension programs often rely on the transmission of technical content generated in academic environments with little or no direct connection to the reality experienced by farmers. These programs typically adhere to the conventional approach of technology transfer and knowledge diffusion, wherein the only valid knowledge is generated in academic settings or derived from the market. Information is imposed from the top down onto the farmers and local rural extension agents, who are expected to assume a passive position in relation to the \"holders of information.\" While such hierarchical knowledge structures have been predominant within industrial agricultural research and extension, the agroecology movement recognizes that incorporating localized expertise and traditional tacit knowledge from rural communities into academic-scientific environments is central to transforming food systems (Utter et al., 2021). The concept of co-creation has been consolidating as an alternative to the conventional model of knowledge diffusion for promoting the necessary changes in food production systems, especially in low-income regions and countries (Utter et al., 2021). Knowledge co-creation is understood here as the interaction among different actors who intentionally seek to integrate their knowledge, learning, and experiences in the pursuit of◼ The integration of local traditional wisdom with academic-scientific knowledge has the potential to generate innovative and more effective solutions to challenges faced by farmers.◼ Adopting co-creation in digital innovations can support digital tool development that better meets the needs and expectations of farmers and extension agents, fostering a sense of ownership and increasing adoption.◼ The experience of Solidaridad in the state of Pará, Brazil, illustrates how applying co-creation principles to the development of digital tools allows for the emergence of new innovations rooted in the needs of farming communities.◼ This example illustrates the dilemmas that may arise in the practical application of the Principles for socially inclusive digital tools for smallholder farmers and brings to light the limitations of developing co-creation through digital technology.solutions to common problems. Applied specifically to agricultural practices, it refers to the collaborative development of farm practices among farmers, researchers, technical advisors, and others. It is framed as an approach of social inclusion to support farmers' agency, ability to express their needs and perspectives, and to make informed decisions (Dittmer et al., 2022).Concurrently, with a wider interest for co-creation approach, traditional agricultural extension methods are undergoing transformation driven by the proliferation of digital tools for advisory services. Digital tools are framed as a way to overcome challenges of rural extension in accessing farmers in remote areas and are disrupting the way knowledge is transferred to farmers. Digital technologies are reshaping how information about practices, processes, and work organization is disseminated (Schnebelin et al., 2021). The widespread availability and affordability of mobile phones and internet access, even in isolated regions and low-income countries, is making it possible to break the longstanding isolation from knowledge, information, and connections experienced by farmers (Fabregas et al., 2019).However, the positive impacts of using digital tools for agricultural extension are still modest (Coggins et al., 2022).In a study by the Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (GFRAS) on the status of digital advisory services across Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, a very low number of digital rural advisory services manage to effectively onboard and retain users over time and survive beyond the pilot phase (Larsen and Keller, 2023). One of the factors that may explain this scenario is that many digital solutions designed to facilitate rural advisory services often lack an attractive value proposition for the end user, whether it be the farmer or the extension agent. The most common business model among digital tool developers relies on delivering services in exchange for the information provided by the user. This tends to bias the value proposition of the product or service toward favoring data collection over delivering services and benefits to the end user. As a result, it is common that the farmer or extension agent struggle to use the tool or simply do not derive value from its use, discontinuing using the tool after one experience.In this context, applying co-creation principles to the development of digital tools emerges as a potential avenue to address these limitations and genuinely provide value to farmers as they strive for more productive, profitable, and climate-resilient production systems.The approach and methodology adopted at each stage of the ATDT project carried out by the Alliance of Biodiversity and CIAT and Solidaridad in the Brazilian Amazon were grounded in the Principles for digital development (2022) and the Principles for socially inclusive digital tools for smallholder farmers (Dittmer et al., 2022), providing a practical example of the application of these principles and the challenges and trade-offs it entails (Figure 1).Situated in the heart of the legal Amazon region, the state of Pará stands out as one of Brazil´s major cattle hubs. The deforestation rate is still alarmingly high due to agricultural expansion, despite significant progress in recent years. With 95% of smallholder-farms in the region not receiving any type of technical assistance service, it is a pivotal area for the development of a low-carbon beef cattle production system. Solidaridad has been working in the Southeast and Southwest Pará, in the municipalities of Novo Repartimento, Pacajá and Anapu, for over 10 years, focusing on developing and implementing with farmers a production model that promotes an increase in family income, while ensuring a reduction in carbon emissions and deforestation. The rural extension model developed by Solidaridad incorporates the use of digital tools to systematize information and facilitate the dissemination of technical content, following a conventional model of knowledge and technology diffusion. The approach taken within the framework of the ATDT project involved a fundamental reconsideration of this conventional top-down approach to the use of digital tools for agricultural extension. The framework aims to combine top-down (expert-to-farmer) with bottom-up (farmer-to-expert) and peer-to-peer (farmer-to-farmer) modes of communication to increase farmers´ agency and create practical conditions for the co-creation of locally relevant practices.The first step was to engage a diverse group of farmers and local extension agents. The next step was to foster an environment conducive to farmers expressing their needs and perceptions of the challenges to dissemination and adoption of low-carbon practices and to the emergence of new ideas for practical solutions and strategies, including digital tools, to overcome these challenges. For that purpose, a round of in-person participatory workshops was carried out in the territories, involving in total 90 people, including 15 Solidaridad's extension staff, five digital tool developers and 70 farmers with diverse profiles. Farmers raised a significant number of challenges centered around the accessibility of pertinent and locally tailored information. This extends beyond technical and productive aspects to encompass crucial sociocultural considerations and the importance for farmers to identify with the information sender. The significance of local influencers and success stories within the community emerged as pivotal in building trust and guaranteeing that action is taken towards the adoption of new practices.These insights shaped the requirements and specifications for new digital innovations developed by Solidaridad. The first step of the co-creation process resulted in the design and prototyping of a new digital tool, Solis, that builds on applications and social media widely used by producers and extension agents and on an existing Solidaridad mobile application to support extension staff in their daily routine, called Extension Solution. Solis encourages two-way interaction between extensionists and farmers and fosters the co-creation and sharing of audiovisual content on locally relevant practices among farmers and local agents (see this presentation on the development of Solis, 2023). On Solis, farmers can access the list of priority practices and individual guidance provided by their extension officer, update status of tasks, upload evidence and request validation from the extensionist. The most innovative part of the app is the social and gamified experience to encourage users to create their own videos, upload them on existing video platform (such as YouTube, Kwai, TikTok), interact and cooperate with other users online and offline. The end goal is to create and sustain a community-driven repository and social mechanisms to foster and sustain the generation and sharing of knowledge.Three months after the co-creation workshops, Solidaridad's team went back to the field to share a beta version of Solis with the farmers, get their feedback and start the second phase of the co-creation process, consisting in producing collaborative audiovisual content about production practices for publication on Solis. The feedback from the farmers and extension agents who participated in the session were incorporated in the 1.0 version of the app, which was launched one month later. During the activation sessions, the farmers were invited to access Solis, share their feedback on the product and to volunteer to record the first videos to be published on Solis.The next steps, planned for 2024, will focus on organizing dissemination and activation activities to scale the use of the tool, provide user support, and monitor the uptake and usage of the tool.There is no co-creation without trust, and building trust with farming communities takes time. A key success factor in creating the conditions for a genuine engagement and co-creation process with farmers has been the diversity of the skills and perspectives from the members of the Solidaridad team involved in this project, combined with the existence of a long-standing trust relationship between the organization and the farmers community. The multidisciplinary team, composed of developers, UX/UI specialists, product analyst and rural development professionals with field experience in the region, made it possible to build an approach that resonated with the language and mindset of farmers while following the process for digital product development. However, the team acknowledged that farmers engaged in the co-creation process were already beneficiaries of Solidaridad´s technical assistance and could inhibit the expression of challenges or unmet needs, either due to a fear of displeasing Solidaridad's technical staff or a desire to be positively perceived by the Solidaridad team.Researchers are aware of this kind of social desirability bias: the desire to be viewed positively or avoid criticism can influence people to present themselves in a more favorable light, potentially distorting the true picture of their attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. Attempting to minimize this potential bias, a limited number of Solidaridad staff attended each session, participating as unobtrusive observers during the discussions. While the existing trust relationship remains the key factor for successful, enduring, and high-quality engagement in an authentic cocreation process, it is crucial to be mindful of the impact of social desirability mechanisms and to adopt measures to try to limit them.Engage diverse farmers is the first Principle for digital tool use and co-creation of best practices with farmers and a well-established pre-requirement for designing inclusive digital products. This requires gathering baseline data to understand the types of diversity among the targeted population (e.g., gender, age, language, ethnicity, land tenure, etc.), define subgroups relevant to the local context, and plan activities to enable genuine participation of individuals from these various subgroups.In any collaborative project, existing social relations and power relations may affect actors' willingness to share their opinion or advocate for their own needs and priorities or even inhibit participation of specific groups.Observations from previous interventions in farming communities indicated that women and young men and women often tend to be inhibited in the presence of older male producers. Conversely, older producers may experience discomfort discussing about digital tools in the presence of younger individuals, who are generally more acquainted and at ease with technology. To minimize the biases that may arise from existing or perceived power dynamics, the workshops with farmers were organized in non-mixed groups (respectively composed of women, young men and women, and men farmers) and in small settings, so that each participant could feel comfortable sharing their perspective.In this farming community, women tend to be more involved in administrative and farm management activities, sometimes having a higher level of education than men, and are generally more accustomed to using digital tools.In this context, it proved to be more effective to prioritize the engagement of young people and women in the design of the digital innovations and in the co-creation of practices as they tended to be more comfortable with the use of digital tools and the production of audiovisual content in the workshops.The proactivity of these individuals identified as \"digital early-adopters\" has been strategic for initiating the process of collaborative content creation, but it also poses challenges in terms of inclusivity as their ownership of the process may influence the format and type of content and result in an unintentional exclusion of older farmers that may not identify with the tool. Meeting high standards of inclusivity is crucial to ensure that nobody is left behind, but it is also important to recognize that some profiles of producers do not have an affinity for technology. In these cases, seeking solutions for their inclusion in the process should extend beyond digital innovations, involving the creation of alternative forms of participation not directly reliant on digital tool usage. In the case of Solis, encouraging younger producers to capture video and conduct interviews with their more experienced counterparts, valuing their knowledge and enabling them to contribute to the co-creation of practices without being direct users of the tool is an approach to be tested.In addition to collecting data on users' profile to understand diversity of profiles and socio-cultural norms, it is essential that the baseline for the development or scaling of digital tools includes a deep dive into the existing digital infrastructure and the determining factors associated with the use of digital technology. This encompasses factors such as the availability, coverage, and quality of broadband, as well as the affordability, type of devices (e.g., feature phones or smartphones) and digital services utilized by the target group. In the context of this project, nearly all farmers have a smartphone and use WhatsApp for farming activities and daily communication.While mobile internet coverage is relatively limited in the region, the overwhelming majority of farmers have a stable on-farm internet connection facilitated by satellite technology.One noteworthy insight shared by young farmers and women regarding their actual use of digital tools was their reliance on social media, such as WhatsApp, TikTok, Instagram, and Kwai, to access information about production, despite the challenges they may encounter in accessing the internet, including cost and poor signal quality. Building upon this insight, the development team made two decisions:◼ Use WhatsApp as the point of entry to Solis: A valuable lesson from Solidaridad´s past experiences developing digital solutions is the process of downloading, installing, and creating an account is a challenge for older farmers compared to their younger counterparts. Therefore, it is essential for the initial access and registration process to be extremely simple and tailored to this audience. To address the difficulties faced by producers less familiar with using applications, Solis employs a technology that eliminates app store search, download, and registration hassles. Producers can access Solis through a link shared by extensionists on WhatsApp, requiring internet for automatic download only before offline use.◼ Use existing social media as the service to upload and publish content: once the video is published on these platforms, this content can be embedded and shared on Solis.While capitalizing on the current high engagement level of producers on these applications and reducing storage costs, this approach has a downside, which is the dependency on external platforms that may not adhere to the principles of digital development. The lack of control over external platforms raises concerns about privacy and potential misuse of content shared on these platforms, as farmers may inadvertently expose sensitive data or compromise privacy when sharing information on these platforms. It is therefore essential to consider these risks and implement measures to ensure that farmers have a comprehensive understanding of the consequences associated with sharing data on such platforms.Navigating diverse needs and prioritize ideas within budget and time constraints, while avoiding user frustration and maintaining their engagementApplying the principles of co-creation concept to the development of digital innovations starts with the creation of a conducive environment for the emergence of new ideas generated by the farmers themselves. This engagement of farmers from the early stage of ideation is crucial for creating tools that fit local needs and context, and for ensuring ownership, facilitating greater tool adoption and continued use. However, this also creates the challenge of managing expectations to prevent frustrations that could lead to disengagement. Prioritizing ideas based on time and budget constraints is inevitable and must occur early enough in the process, with clear communication.In this project, farmers proposed numerous solutions to address specific challenges in farm and livestock management. These suggestions encompassed tools for expense and income management, access to meteorological and market information, or health and animal weight management tools. When prioritizing the design of digital innovation, the development team thoroughly considered all these ideas, considering feasibility within time and budget constraints, potential for scalability and the versatility of the proposed solutions to address a wide range of needs expressed by farmers. While tools focused on digitizing specific aspects of the production or farm management process would bring significant benefits to producers, they would be confined to very specific value propositions with limited scaling potential. Moreover, solutions to fulfill these needs are already available in the market and could be introduced to farmers with proper support and training. The development team therefore opted to prioritize the primary overarching challenge identified by farmers: the absence of locally relevant and customized information on low-carbon practices.When the development team returned to the field to present the first version of Solis to the farmers and get their feedback, particular attention was given to communication to explain why this idea was prioritized over other needs and avoid creating frustrations. As stated in the \"design with the user\" principle of The Principles for digital development, it is critical to maintain a strong proximity to users and embrace an iterative process, that allows for incorporating feedback and adapting the tool after the initial testing and launch. Transparent communication regarding budget and time constraints and the logic of prioritization is also crucial for maintaining trust in the process and sustaining engagement.Facilitating information flows among farmers while ensuring quality of content and easy accessFacilitating information flows among farmers, and between farmers and advisors is a sub-principle for digital tool use and co-creation of best practices with farmers (Dittmer et al., 2022). It also forms the core value proposition of Solis, stemming from the recognition that farmers are eager to share their own experiences and learn from \"familiar faces.\" The content quality and technical validity of co-created practices is key to ensure that Solis effectively helps farmers transition to low-carbon and climate-resilient production models. Developing costefficient mechanisms for the curation and classification of content becomes an essential requirement to ensure the tool's credibility while facilitating access and retaining users. However, to expand access to tens or hundreds of thousands of users, the publication, curation, and classification of content cannot be managed manually. This brings forth a dilemma: while co-creation inherently entails direct and human interaction among farmers, researchers, extension staff and other custodians of knowledge, the scalability imperative dictates the automation of certain facets of the process.In the case of Solis, the development team is exploring how to incorporate Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence technologies-already widely utilized by platforms like YouTube and Instagram for content management -to support the curation of co-created content. However, it is also clear that sustaining a genuine process of co-creation of practices requires ongoing in-person support activities in the field. Solis is not to replace face-to-face interactions among or between farmers and extension staff. Instead, its purpose is to complement and enhance spontaneous exchange within communities and during rural extension events. In essence, Solis was conceived as a social technology, harnessing the power of a digital tool to facilitate the establishment of an \"informational solidarity network\" aimed at supporting individual and collective capacitybuilding and decision-making by using content generated by the community. For this reason, the deployment strategy of Solis will involve the formation of a specialized team for content creation and social media management, as well as a specialist in agroecology to provide individualized assistance in the field and coordinate engagement actions for producers and other extension technicians with the new digital tool. Local agents will also be trained to as ambassadors for agroecology and the digitization of their communities.Although the use of digital technology is the enabler of this new format of exchange between farmers, extension workers and other specialists, the challenge of content curation also highlights the limitations of developing cocreation through digital tools.Creating the support ecosystem needed for adoption and retention while ensuring a sustainable business modelThe need to provide support through human intermediaries to help farmers adopt the tool also poses a financial challenge: how to develop a sound business model that facilitates affordable farmer access while covering the costs of maintaining a digital tool and the support system?Developing and maintaining a support infrastructure for the use of digital tools by smallholder farmers includes dissemination and activation campaigns, training and user support activities, and complementary engagement activities to enable continuous creation and updating of content and co-creation of practices. These activities incur a high cost that, unlike maintenance costs of a digital tool, does not decrease significantly with scale. One of the most common business models in the space of digital solutions for small-scale producers is to monetize the data collected from farmers to provide intelligence services to other stakeholders in the value chain. This model may require making trade-offs with the principles of using farmers' data responsibly and its implementation requires caution to preserve producers' privacy and ensure they provide informed consent for all type of uses of their data.At this stage of the process, Solidaridad is still refining the business model for Solis, in complementarity with other digital solutions in its portfolio and is considering moving towards a hybrid business model, combining grants, government support and fees for services derived from the use of Solis, while keeping Solis fully free for farmers and extension staff.The experience of The Alliance of Biodiversity and CIAT and Solidaridad illustrates the transformative potential of applying co-creation principles to the development of digital tools within the context of agricultural extension, but also provides a practical example of the dilemmas and challenges this entails. Leveraging digital tools to enable cocreation of practices requires a paradigm shift in how rural extension programs are conceived and executed, as well as a different approach to digital product development to ensure the needs and expectations of intended users are, and remain, at the forefront of the process.Initial findings and reactions to the new digital development suggest that the co-creation approach, coupled with local capacity building, holds significant potential for uncovering solutions aligned with farmers' expectations, provided that all actors remain aware that digital technology will not replace human interactions."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3900840591.json b/main/part_2/3900840591.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..073750baaef329d731d1f1d25976065b302ff77e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3900840591.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d0d4282d375023056bb506582dd63d75","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fb0f961d-4811-40fa-85d2-f89f866f1ad9/retrieve","id":"1028895971"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"aa2983e6-1d2e-4b18-8695-6693569fcf8f","content":"Colombian farmer fields were used to conduct gene flow analysis, and to identify indicators for easy monitoring of genetic introgression in the crop-weedy rice complex. Gene flow was assessed using as pollen donor a transgenic line carrying the RHBV-N protein-transgene conferring resistance to RHBV, and the gus and hph (hygromycin resistance) marker genes, and a non-transgenic rice variety locally known as Purple, characterized by having purple leaves, tillers, and grain apiculus, and dominant inheritance of anthocyanins Gene flow was traced first at the phenotypic level by detecting gus expression (from transgenic plants) or anthocyanin presence (from non-transgenic plants) in plant tissues, and putative hybrids were then confirmed by microsatellite (SSR) molecular markers, or alternatively directly at the genetic level without knowing the phenotypic profile by bulking DNA samples of various plants and analyze with the specific SSRs. PCR analysis was conducted to trace the presence of transgenes and SSR analysis to confirm the hybrid nature of recovered F1 plants (Figure 1).Herbicide resistance in rice derived from mutagenesis (imidazolinone resistance) was bred and released as improved variety Clearfield CF205® in Central America and Colombia. The herbicide resistant rice is a convenient model because of the easy tracking for the resistance trait in the weedy rice complex. Herbicide is used as a form of chemical control for the weed (positive selection). In the case of wild relatives of rice (Oryza genus) populations found in natural environments and in contact crop zones no herbicide is applied (neutral selection). Total of 499 accessions of weedy rice were collected from farmers fields prior and after planting 1 cycle of Clearfield CF205® tolerant to the herbicide Imazapic (IMI) in Jamundi, Valle del Cauca, and 501 accessions after planting 2-3 cycles of the variety in Tolima, (Colombia) (Fig. 2A). Flowering panicles of weedy rice in contact with flowering panicles of CF205® were randomly selected and collected (Fig. 2B). The acetolactate synthase (ALS) gene that confers resistance to the imazapic herbicide was sequenced and gene specific primers were designed to detect the single point mutation (single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP) in the ALS gene, and used to trace this gene in the weedy populations at landscape level using molecular bulk analysis (Fig. 3)Hybridization rates of about 0.01% to 0.3% confirmed by microsatellite (SSR) markers were obtained when either transgenes or the anthocyanin marker genes were used to trace gene flow under confined experimental conditions in about 24,000 derived progeny plants. All transgenic hybrids confirmed by SSR express gus gene and display the region of the promoter 35S CaMV. Progeny (49.866 plants) derived from weedy rice panicles collected in commercial Clearfield CF205® fields were first assayed for herbicide resistance in replicated field trials. DNA of herbicide resistant plants was bulked, analyzed to detect the presence of the ALS resistant gene (Fig 3 A), and subsequently to identify the number of individual plant (s) per bulk containing the ALS mutation (Fig. 3B, 3C). In the case of Valle del Cauca fields which had been planted just 1 cycle with CF205®, 9.3 % (17.566 plants) of the samples showed resistance to imazapic herbicide, but only 0.4% of these plants contained the ALS mutation from CF 205® confirming the outcross with weedy rice. The rest of the plants maybe indicative of cross-resistance to other ALS target herbicide resistance. This outcross rate is in accordance to previous results shown herein under controlled experimental conditions, and elsewhere.•Outcross of <0.5 % is predominantly from non-transgenic or transgenic rice into weedy rice under controlled experimental conditions. Similar rates were obtained in the first cycle of outcross at landscape level in Valle del Cauca.•The use of non-transgenic herbicide resistance as a model will give information on impact for introgression of non-transgenic resistance genes that may affect fitness of derived hybrids, invasiveness, population dynamics and genetic structure of the corresponding wild/weedy population, and for anticipating a potential impact from a transgenic situation. This information will be useful for in situ conservation, and could be applicable to develop guidelines for environmental safety and coexistence of different types of agriculture systems in the Neotropics.•Using bulk DNA and PCR-based analysis allows the assessment of large number of samples with a high precision to detect hybrids. This methodology is useful for tracking and monitoring gene flow at large scale in farmers' fields and in crop-to-wild contact zones. The scoring of phenotypic trait alone (i.e. gus expression, vegetative tissue color, herbicide resistance) could either under or overestimate the level of hybridization rate.•SSR can be used to determine gene flow but the population genetic structure needs to be known prior the analysis. In our study, thus methods and tools need to be adapted to assess out-cross at landscape level using specific SNP molecular markers detecting the gene of interest by bulk analysis, allowing to analyze large populations of samples (about 19.128 plants) in about 1 month. This protocol will also be applicable for analysis at ecological level."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3914778536.json b/main/part_2/3914778536.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..460db7c38a0b533259d0688d9d0518e81692e6ee --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3914778536.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f191c82d588e97ae68f7da2eeab0c5f1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Flyer/REDD-safeguards-5.pdf","id":"1923874881"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0ef7d328-ea4a-45da-ae61-e09148b08e75","content":"Women from forest-dependent Indigenous Peoples (IPs) and local communities (LCs) play a key role in forest management, yet are frequently marginalized from decision making related to actions in their forests.• Overall, the design and implementation of REDD+ actions may be repeating the mistakes of prior conservation and development actions that failed to build in responsiveness to women's rights and gender equality; safeguards standards may be a way to change these practices.• Our analysis shows that despite a commendable turn away from gender-blind requirements in safeguards, there is still much to be done.• Most of the standards included some gender-related criteria regarding land and resource rights, but only one specifically considered securing IP and LC women's land and resource rights.• Standards have a range of gender equality requirements regarding REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms; these range from strategies to assure women receive equal access to benefits, to securing women's participation in the construction of those mechanisms.• However, only two standards required that grievance mechanisms were gender-responsive or accessible to women; this is an aspect that should receive more attention to bridge the gap between the potential and real impact of these standards.Safeguards standards and guidelines can play an important role in achieving social and environmental goals in response to countries' and corporations' interest in 'Nature-based Solutions' to the climate crisis. Covered more broadly in the first flyer in this series, the rights and justice concerns regarding the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) framework for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) have largely related to Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' (IPs and LCs) access to land and natural resources, respect for their access to information about climate actions and participation in relevant decision making, as well as the fair 2016,2017,2019). Women, then, must be included and recognized in the decision making on design and implementation of climate policies and programmes for them to be effective and inclusive. This can build from, and amplify the action and agency of, the women of IPs and LCs across levels and scales.This international attention has not been reflected in the implementation of REDD+ on the ground. For example, community or joint forest management projects (including REDD+ projects) regularly exclude women and fail to recognize gender inequalities and roles; and when gender-specific considerations do occur, most focus on women's vulnerabilities, without addressing the differentiated experiences of the women of IPs and LCs (Löw 2020). Instead, development and implementation of climate mitigation and low emission development actions must first ensure recognition of the women of IPs and LCs and their experiences, but must also go beyond simply \"adding and stirring women into the REDD+ pot\" (Bee and Basnett 2017).Meaningful inclusion through gender-transformative approaches would strengthen or create systems that support gender equality by recognizing and addressing the formal and informal roots of marginalization from access to land and resources, as well as to relevant decision-making spaces and in benefit sharing (Pham et al. 2016;RRI 2017;Joshi et al. 2021). Project proponents would transcend 'gender-blind' approaches that conceptualize the 'community' or 'household' as undifferentiated cohesive units, and move beyond 'gender exploitative' activities that reinforce or capitalize on gender norms that structure inequalities by instrumentalizing women's traditional roles to achieve project goals (Arwida et al. 2016). This approach must be built on a recognition of the different knowledges, uses, experiences and values that men and women have in relation to forest resources (Mai et al. 2011). For example, research in six countries found that women and men in villages with REDD+ initiatives held different perspectives on well-being, and men had greater access to decision making and information regarding the distribution of benefits (Larson et al. 2018). Not only do women have different knowledges, but they may also be devalued, along with their forest activities. This can reinforce men's control over forest governance (Stiem and Krause 2016). When women are not just attendees, but recognized and included participants, evidence suggests that outcomes are not only more equitable but also more sustainable (Arora-Jonsson et al. 2019).Overall, the design and implementation of REDD+ initiatives may repeat the mistakes of prior conservation and development actions that failed to build in responsiveness to women's rights and gender equity (Larson et al. 2018;Pham et al. 2021). Genderblind initiatives may further marginalize women from participating in and benefitting from forest-based actions, reinforcing or exacerbating gendered inequalities, and devaluing women's work and knowledge (Westholm and Arora-Jonsson 2015; Bee and Basnett 2017; Howson 2017; Ickowitz et al. 2017). In the context of REDD+, voluntary safeguards standards may be a pathway to guide projects to more gender-transformative approaches. We explore that potential below.In what follows, we present our preliminary analysis of the official documents available for each standard or guideline (see the references at the end of this flyer).Most of the standards/guidelines (10/11) analysed in the table above explicitly consider gender issues; this growing gender awareness is commendable. Together, they present a wide scope of different requirements regarding the integration of gender considerations. These include the collection of gender disaggregated data (especially on tenure/resource rights) as part of project baselines, the inclusion of women in participatory spaces and holding gender-sensitive consultations, the design of equitable benefit sharing mechanisms, ensuring tenure security for both men and women, and the implementation of grievance mechanisms that are gender-responsive and accessible to women. Disaggregating data by gender or requiring specific consideration of the potential impacts on women in a project's social baseline is common (7/11). Nonetheless, most of the standards fall short on setting guidelines or requirements on how to use this data. Only one specifically requires a plan to address any differentiated impacts identified in the baseline.A more concrete action related to gender required by most of the standards (10/11) is to assure that project consultations are carried out in a 'gender-inclusive' or 'gender-sensitive' manner, or at least with the participation of women. In the standards reviewed, gender-inclusive or -sensitive usually refers to overcoming the participation barriers that impact women and ensuring women have a voice in decision making. Nonetheless, there are no specific guidelines on how to do so in any of the standards, or specific indicators to measure when this is accomplished. Most of the standards require this for all consultations, and one specifically requires it for consultations regarding benefit sharing. women. Given the potential of REDD+ actions to impact the rights of IPs and LCs, this is an aspect that should receive more attention. If women are disadvantaged or negatively affected by other measures, there must be appropriate channels for them to raise their concerns without repercussions, as well as pathways for redress when required.From gender-blind initiatives to a gender-transformative REDD+Our preliminary analysis shows that despite a commendable turn away from gender-blind requirements (10/11) in the safeguards related to voluntary standards and the guidelines of multilateral financial institutions, there is much more to do. REDD+ initiatives are missing an opportunity to go beyond minimum 'do no harm' standards to engage with IP and LC women as rightsholders, changemakers, leaders, and partners in the effort to address the climate emergency.A gender-transformative approach to REDD+ would challenge the underlying structures and processes that uphold inequality, for example seeking to address the underlying root causes of the gender-differentiated impacts of climate change. This requires actions that go beyond being gender sensitive -or that seek to 'do no harm' -and instead actively and strategically promote gender equality, women's empowerment, inclusion, and equal access to land, resources and benefits for men and women (Kabeer 2010; Elias et al 2021). REDD+ standards and relevant guidelines must be designed to address the differentiated needs and priorities of all members of IPs and LCs, and collaborate towards gender inclusion by harnessing women's strengths and voices. REDD+ initiatives and their proponents can catalyse transformation through collaborations and partnerships with communities that ensure inclusion and equal access to land, resources, and benefits and support self-determination. Standards can provide them with specific implementation guidelines and indicators to monitor progress towards a gendertransformative REDD+.We will continue to update our analysis as part of GCS REDD+'s engagement with REDD+ safeguards, providing evidence-based recommendations towards a rightsresponsive REDD+ that brings benefits to both forests and the men and women that steward them."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3919588390.json b/main/part_2/3919588390.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4071de8cd9e00756358c13371e4179a2272f9acf --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3919588390.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f40ef064265b9fcb02a3729aad68780d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e11f4c96-73d1-4e73-af38-de1bd8c51250/retrieve","id":"2016859236"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e43175bf-13f7-4aaa-a30b-693b78c520c4","content":"The cultivation of rice (Oryza sativa) necessitates contemporary crop and soil management practices. Therefore, Rice Crop Manager (RCM), a web-based decision support tool has been developed to provide site specific nutrient recommendations in Odisha, India. The tool is functional and has been deployed by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) to cater to the needs of the farmers based on a brief questionnaire about their current farming procedures. The data generated is now used to make informed decisions about ideal conditions of rice planting, adoption of optimized irrigation, weed management etc. Extraction of useful insights from the data by an extended use of statistics, artificial intelligence (AI), domain knowledge, predictive analysis comes under the parasol of the proposed work. Commencing from the year 2015 -till date 2,83,346 recommendations have been already spawned for 31 districts of Odisha state in eastern India. The analysis includes the most common varieties grown, the tentative date of sowing year-wise, the gender details, youth involvement and many more discernments. The functionality of RCM can be expanded to include not only the fertilizer recommendations but also to ensure decision making and develop support systems to cater to the needs of different stakeholders. The methodology makes use of cutting-edge technologies like machine learning to develop a model to select the optimum parameters involved to generate the recommendations. The target yield has been also estimated with a calibration and a validation ratio of 70:30 through performance evaluation particularly by computing R-Square, root mean square error and mean absolute error. The analysis showed that the approach is well suited for the kind of data acquired, later it may be automated to derive more valuable information for the benefit of the farmers.Shalini Gakhar 1 , Benedict Jardinero 1 , Preeti Bharti 1 , Rowena Castillo 1 , Jerome Vila 1 , Sheetal Sharma 1 1 International Rice Research InstituteUse of Artificial Intelligence for Rice Crop Manager (RCM) backend datasets to estimate yield in Odisha, IndiaThe FrameworkThe BackgroundDistrict, Field Size, crop per year, season, agroecology, establishment method, seedbed, Growth duration, seedling age, typical yield, harvesting method, residue management, weed control, herbicide, fertilizers used etc.1. Over 0.2 Millions observations have been collected through RCM, in Odisha.After rigorous data cleaning, the training file for the ANN model was created. 2. The observed yield from the on-farm experiments was taken for training the model, which was further used for remaining data to estimate yield. 3. Using Artificial intelligence and machine learning based approach the key parameters included to estimate the target yield will be identified that can substitute interviewing farmers. 4. The similar analysis will be extended to other districts of Odisha, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Philippines. 5. The acquired data can be used to derive useful insights for different stakeholders."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3952390290.json b/main/part_2/3952390290.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba37a65d7981b89463e77062cbbe3843b7b9cc11 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3952390290.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f1eb3722cd28801656293b8a15c5d1d7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/cc4f0dd2-47a1-4cc8-87fd-c92fb712b957/retrieve","id":"-127319202"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f7233343-6cab-4dd4-b4a1-367cc336c8f3","content":"GENDER-RESPONSIVENESS of your project's technical farmer training events This resource sets out simple suggestions for ensuring that women as well as men feel included in training events, are fully informed about technological options, learn effectively, and have the confidence to implement what they have learned. Over time, if their experience has been successful, they should be able to build on the training course to innovate by themselves in response to their needs and changes in the wider environment. Good training events need more than great content. How you train is vitally important. It is essential that women and men -including youth, persons with disabilities, and other marginalized groups -are able to speak their minds and have opportunities to shape the training event for their own requirements. As future farmers, the needs of young women and men in farming households require special attention in order to encourage those interested to stay in the sector. Communities are diverse. Standardized one-size-fits-all training events are unlikely to work. Adapt and contextualize your basic training content to the real women and men, persons with disabilities, and other marginalized people in your target groups. Take a little timeto learn about who does what in the production system, and beyond that, to the market. This will help you tailor your training content to make it relevant to the women and men you are targeting. Make your event fun to attend and focus on participatory learning by doing. Listen to what your participants say. They will already know a lot about their specific agroecological and market systems. Ensure your training has scope for building on participants' existing knowledge; this will make it easier for them to assimilate new material and will make it more relevant.training events fun.Run discussion workshops, storytelling, role-plays, case studies, collective tasting and cooking events (men should also cook), and other activities. Include energizers, songs, and dance.Involve community members who can inspire participants. This helps strengthen buy-in from the community and the participants themselves.Facilitators should consider wearing bright colors. This brings energy to the room and the participants.Don't put participants on the spot, or as a negative point of reference.Build up women's skills and confidence by asking them to facilitate small group discussions, act as note-takers, or make presentations on behalf of their groups. This applies to people with disabilities, or living with chronic illnesses, and young women and men, too.A simple way of creating equality is to create small spaces to hear everyone's voice.People love to see their ideas valued in daily reviews, so give space for each person to speak -for example, one idea each, and acknowledge their input.Treat women as well as men as scientists and innovators.Find ways to involve, support, and highlight women farmers and young people (alongside men) as co-researchers and as demonstration farmers in field activities. This will help to develop their confidence and boost their standing as people worth listening to and emulating in the community.The project and the training event should walk the talk by enlisting women as trainers and having women staff in key decision-making positions.Facilitators should be role models for women and marginalized people's participation, representation, and inclusion.Think of key words or principles to guide your training event. Some good ones are inclusion, fun, helping people move forward, and walking your talk. Together with your training team and the participants themselves, you may think of more.The tip sheet includes some tried and tested principles. support men as well as women towards positive change.Collect information to make your training relevant.Find out women and men's priorities in relation to the technology. The perspectives of women and men are likely to be different because of their gender and other factors, such as age, caste, class, and ethnicity. They may have different responsibilities in their crop/livestock production systems and are likely to have distinct needs, interests, experiences, and resources.Work with the ideas of women and men technology users when designing training events. Conduct focus group discussions with target groups and key informants to develop training content. Pilot your event before rolling it out.Find out what members of your target group already know. Respect that knowledge and build on it.Promote technologies as menus rather than packages.Promote the ability of participants to select from and adapt a range of technologies.Build on women and men's existing expertise whilst helping them to find ways to develop their understanding and their roles in relation to the particular technology.Create space for discussion around the trade-offs between technological choices, and how trade-offs -for instance balancing use of residues between crop, livestock, and household requirements -may affect women's and men's work and benefits.Move beyond focusing on the technology itself. Discuss its place in wider change processes affecting the community -climate change, urbanization, etc. What are the implications for the technology you are introducing? How do the participants think they could adapt to the technology in the future?Making sure your course is relevant to both women and men is key. After all, they farm together.Farmers attend a training in Bangladesh. Photo: S. Mojumder/Drik/CIMMYT.Make your training event interactive and provide plenty of opportunities for participants to do, speak, share, think, and have fun.Ensure the training methodology is right for the participants.Plenty of practical, hands-on demonstrations work well, particularly in the participants' own fields. Learning by doing using one's own resources helps to promote control over experimental design and encourage experimentation.Language.Use the language spoken by participants rather than a national or international language, if appropriate. Women, in particular, may be less fluent in national languages.Don't use forms of language that promote hierarchies of understanding such as \"experts\" and \"trainees.\"Check for gender and other stereotypes.Check for hidden assumptions about gender and other matters in your training materials. These may make women or other socially marginalized participants feel excluded.Create a respectful atmosphere.Encourage people to respect each other's opinions however much they may disagree.Agree with everyone that the event is meant to be a safe space for learning and experience sharing.Ask participants not to make fun of others' well-intentioned comments or repeat unflattering stories outside the workshop. Confidentiality must be respected.Where possible, promote flat learning and knowledge-sharing structures.Move away from top-down lead farmer models to horizontal ones that promote group sharing and learning processes, both within and between groups.Within this, mentoring and peer replication approaches can be developed and supported.Foster positive interactions in mixed groups.If women are unfamiliar with speaking in public, create small safe environments with a maximum of four to six people.Make sure that there are at least two to three women in each small mixed group so they can support each other, and encourage them to speak.Encourage equal participation through group and pair work discussions, rotating seat assignments, limiting speaking time per participant, and male/female speaking order.Role-playing can be fun whilst encouraging debate around potentially sensitive topics, such as marketing.Ensure flat power relationships between women and men in a group setting. It is better to have equals in a group rather than boss/workers.In some cases, women may prefer to meet separately to formulate their ideas before bringing them (often anonymized) to the larger mixed group.Use ICTs, film, other media.Consider multi-media forms of training, such as information and communication technologies (ICTs), mobile phones, radio, and other media during and beyond the training event.Feedback.Course evaluation criteria should be robust and easy to use.Encourage women and men to comment openly on the processes of inclusion in the event and the training methods and content.Feedback should be disaggregated by gender.Ask participants to commit themselves to one action immediately after the course and to share these with others.Including women effectively in training events, and above all enabling them to take risks and implement new ideas and technologies, depends on a conducive environment. Research shows it is much harder for women to take risks and do things differently than for men. Men are often praised for taking a risk, even if they fail. Women who take risks may be laughed at, or marginalized, by other women as well as men.Engage community members in exploring how existing community structures could be developed to overcome gender barriers. Promote inclusion in training events, and safe learning and experimentation spaces. Ensure that the process is participatory and involves all segments of the communitywomen, men, youth, socially marginalized people, as well as opinion formers and decision-makers, at different points. Actively include experts such as agricultural extension workers from target communities.Help people in your target community and your other partners to identify the costs when women are not included. Get them on board to support women innovators.Build community appreciation of the benefits to participation by women, youth, and marginalized people.The training event will only work if people attend it voluntarily. To secure support for women's participation, sensitize the community in advance of the training event.Talk about women's participation with community leaders and opinion-formers, male household heads, and relatives in extended families (if appropriate, such as parentsin-law).Agree right from the start whether women will be trained together with men, or separately. Separate training runs the risk of creating a \"them and us\" feeling, but in some situations women need their own spaces to learn effectively.Identify and work with local gender/women's organizations to help secure participation and tackle problems that may arise.Go farm to farm to secure the engagement of women, and be ready to talk to all household members about their questions and concerns.Reach women via various social networks -religious, school-related, sports, savings groups, etc. Identify mobility, time, and other constraints that might limit women's participation in training activities. Discuss with community members and husbands, as well as with women, how these may be overcome. Usually, events held in the morning exclude women because they have to attend to household chores.with existing gender norms.Develop training activities to foster reflection and action around gendered attitudes and practices that may limit a family's ability to adopt new technologies and practices, and build on positive local gender norms that highlight women's knowledge and contributions.Use games that will make everybody laugh and then draw some learning related to the gender norms expressed in those games, and build from there.Work with young women on their participation and leadership skills and potential. Help them to construct new images of themselves as people with rights, aspirations, and dreams.Support men and boys.Gender-responsive training events can challenge the perceptions of men and boys around who does what, who is responsible, and who benefits. Depending on the type of project, it may be useful to consider ways to support men as they begin to confront and question cultures that shape their identities at home, in their community, at work, and in the media.Strengthen men's personal commitment to gender equality and equip them with the knowledge and skills to put that commitment into practice in their own lives.In some situations where interventions include long-term transformative change, it may be useful to create men-only groups to help men support each other in changing their behaviors and challenge concepts and practices related to traditional ways of being a man.Work with young men through organizing peer-training events.Farmers learn in Bangladesh. Photo: S. Mojumder/Drik/CIMMYT.Technology adopters are highly diverse in any community. People live in many forms of household, including child-headed, polygamous, male and female-headed, and so on. There may be different ethnic and religious groups, people with disabilities, and people living with HIV/AIDS. Getting young women and men on board and excited about farming is important. It is vital to target women in male-headed households, and women heads of household. Remember that targeting is not just about getting a specific number of selected groups into a training course. Understanding the gender-related constraints that limit women's participation and the type of support they require is important. Link women's participation in the training event to the wider goals of the whole family. Frame the development of women's knowledge and skills within broader goals centering on achieving the goals the family considers important (e.g., health, nutrition, and education).Ensure that direct links between women's contributions and entitlements are made. Build direct associations between women's improved capacity to contribute to the household economy (income generation, household food, and nutrition security) and their right to secure benefits in terms of more equitable food distribution and voice in cross-cutting expenditure decisions (e.g., investments in businesses, children's education, and other important goals). It is essential that the dreams and aspirations of the women, for themselves, are included in this.Women heads of household are frequently hard to reach. Evidence shows they are often early adopters and innovators. However, they may need special assistance to continue with their innovations. Whilst women benefit from remittances, others struggle with a lack of adult (often male) labor, weak access to productive resources, and low social capital. A special effort needs to be made to reach and support such women in training events, and to ensure the content is relevant to them. In some cases, supporting initiatives to develop the productive resources of such households may be important if they are to implement the new technologies effectively.in training events.In some cases, women-only training events may be best.Set straightforward targets -for example, at least 30% women's participation in the training event. The national government may set minimum quotas that should be taken as a starting point for building on (but should not define the limits to ambition!).Set a target for young people as well -for instance, 30% youth with 50:50 participation between female and male youth. This sets a cultural expectation which, even when the original participants move on, can be replicated in subsequent training events.Heads of household are often invited to training events, although they may not be responsible for actual technology implementation. It is best to ensure that both heads of household and their spouses participate.Ensure women heads of households are invited and supported to participate actively.Use the training course as an opportunity to address gender and social inequalities in the community. If the training is longer than a day, give participants homework on things to reflect on with their families or on their own. Ask them to share their reflections the next day.Make sure you have identified the needs of socially marginalized women and men for the technology addressed in the training and ensure you engage them successfully. Meet them prior to the training, if possible, to reassure them that their participation is important and encourage them to come. Marginalized people feel empowered when they come to the training event and are warmly welcomed by the facilitator. This builds their sense of self-worth.If possible, make individual visits to the marginalized population's homes to see how they are implementing the technologies and give on-the-spot advice. This promotes their standing in the community.Farmers learn about drought tolerant maize at field school. Photo: Anne Wangalachi/CIMMYT.Get the timing right.Consider seasonality with respect to both women's and men's work both on their own farms, and potentially as hired labor. Hold training courses when the demands of work are less. Ask the participants the best times and best venues for holding training events, bearing in mind women's daily activities, such as preparing food and hauling water. Don't make courses too long -one to two hours is probably just right, but check with the participants about what best suits them.Get the budget right.Addressing gender and social inequalities cost money. This must be budgeted for:Training events should, wherever possible, be located within villages or within easy reach of women's homes.Childcare may need to be provided (remember that family and friends are not always able to take on this responsibility).Should childcare not be possible or welcomed, make it clear that breast-feeding mothers, as well as toddlers, are welcome to attend the training. This will ensure that young mothers come.In some societies, chaperones may need to be transported, housed, and fed if the training takes place in a central location.Adequate sanitation facilities are particularly crucial to the participation of women and of participants with disabilities.Provide light refreshments to keep up energy levels and encourage group building. If lunch is required, pay local women to provide it. Consider encouraging men/ male youth to cook and serve. Make sure that women and men queue together rather than separately. Lunch can become a fun way of rethinking the gender norms that everyone carries with them.Women inspect maize seed in Zambia. Photo: P. Setimela/CIMMYT.Women and men often have different daily and seasonal schedules. Time training sessions around those schedules, and ensure that training sessions are not too long and easily accessible to women and persons with disabilities. In some cultural settings either women or men trainers may be more effective. Otherwise, aim for a gender balance in trainers. Male-female teams help segregated communities overcome some of their fears and taboos about women and men working together.Where possible, work with NGOs and women's groups and men's groups that focus on gender transformation to develop empowering training methodologies.Ensure diverse representation of social groups as peer trainers, mobilizers, and facilitators.Develop a cohort of excellent women and men facilitators to help women to participate actively. Aim towards at least 50% women trainers. If this is not possible, consider ways to build up the number of women in your training team.Pair less experienced facilitators with more seasoned facilitators with a good understanding of gender issues to share experiences and techniques.Train facilitators in techniques to help women speak. Encourage men to respect women's views and give them space to talk.Women can do technology too.Pair women and men staff to lead community introductions and trainings.Recruit women technical staff to teach on traditionally male-dominated topics, such as pesticide applications, mechanization, etc. Set a benchmark (e.g., 30% moving towards at least 50% for women field staff in key roles).Develop the skills of women in the community to conduct training. In the beginning, they can shadow experienced trainers in training events and be given responsibility for specific tasks.Women participants may feel more open with a woman trainer, be more willing to ask and answer questions and to admit knowledge gaps. Men may prefer their wives to have a female trainer. In such cases, it is important to ensure that women facilitators train women-only groups.Women facilitators may need specific support in the field and their work more broadly, including onsite childcare if they have young children.Ensure accommodation is safe with adequate sanitation.Encourage and support women to discuss their training experiences and any problems they may face which hamper their ability to work well.The training is just the beginning. Ensure reports and recommendations reflect on the gender issues raised by the training event.Provide refresher courses at set time periods.As part of the technical refresher, ask your participants how they have been adopting and adapting to the technologies you trained them on. Have there been any special issues facing women, youth, and other target groups? What can be done about them?Building in interactive discussions on these processes will help improve your own training events and make them even more technologically and socially relevant.Recognized community-level experts such as older women may be trained to mentor/ coach younger women -for example, on the technologies.Develop case studies or life stories of the adoption process to build into future training courses. Make sure these are anonymized.A Vietnamese farmer applies fertilizer. Photo: Mike Listman/CIMMYT."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3977022101.json b/main/part_2/3977022101.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d27c843b7000fd3627076a0bb2a2304ef79e34f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3977022101.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"63468047419cb72ee333106a8764fb3b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/37d0f352-36ed-4c33-8ef1-3bb8412843ad/retrieve","id":"52775750"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ce3a9dd0-0131-4ca0-9903-b93ff21f8524","content":"Grafting is a technique whereby cut tissue surfaces of different plants are placed in close contact to make an effective union. Grafting is a universal method for transmitting viruses, because grafting can transmit systemic viruses. Some grafts, however, are easier to do than others. Grafting is particularly useful for transmission of phloem-restricted viruses that cannot be transmitted mechanically and viruses whose vectors remain unknown, and for detecting viruses found in low concentrations.Virus transmission by grafting may not be 100%-effective if the virus is unable to cross the graft union, or if the virus source plant was not totally invaded and the portion used was virusfree due to irregular virus distribution.Successful virus transmission depends on the characteristics of the virus and on the union achieved through grafting. A virus such as Sweetpotato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV), which is restricted to the vascular system, can be transmitted only when vascular tissues are united. On the other hand, viruses affecting the parenchyma (e.g. Sweetpotato feathery mottle virus, SPFMV) can be transmitted more easily because the transmission depends solely on the union of the cortex or the medula.There are several types of grafts, but wedge-graft is the most common used on sweetpotato virus diagnosis (see Figure 1). Grafting allows transmission of all viruses. Sweetpotato viruses infect Ipomoea setosa causing visible symptoms.A laboratory coat should always be worn when working in the greenhouse. New razor blades should be used when grafting per accession.Be careful when manipulating sulfuric acid 98% since it causes severe irritation and burns. May be harmful if swallowed. Avoid breathing vapor. Use with adequate ventilation. Avoid contact with eyes, skin, and clothes. Wash containers, glassware, seeds, etc., thoroughly after handling. Keep container closed. In case of spill, dilute with water and mop up, or absorb with an inert dry material and place in an appropriate waste disposal container. If necessary: Neutralize the residue with a dilute solution of sodium carbonate. Keep the seeds immersed in the acid for 60 min (or 20 min for I. nil seeds), making sure they are completely covered with acid. Keep under constant shaking at 120 rpm.  Pour off acid (preferably into adequate container for disposal).  Dip seeds in a container full of water and stir liquid for a few minutes with a rod (you may use a wide bottomed bucket or a plastic tray).  Rinse seeds 3-4 times and help with fingers to eliminate peel remaining attached to the seeds. Treated seeds are placed in plastic Petri dishes of 10 cm in diam. or trays containing tap or deionized water and five layers or 10 layers of water-soaked paper respectively (avoid excess water)  Cover seeds with an additional layer of paper and wet it.  Maintain seeds at 25°±4°C until germination. Add water if necessary. Do not use more than 30 seeds per plate or 150 seeds per tray.Production of plants  Three or four days after emergence of hypocotyl and radicle, eliminate the seed cover attached to the seedlings.  In a controlled screenhouse at 25°±4°C, transplant the seedlings to jiffy strips for 3-4 days and then to individual pots for approx. 2 weeks until plants have 2-3 fully expanded true leaves."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3979176985.json b/main/part_2/3979176985.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..61ce6b2e8a9b69d69f9ded1cd97160017e9bd196 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3979176985.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7e341dec8ed6f843d8f53ab1260e0d04","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/343d9fb8-9293-4e16-8b42-44068c5fcb56/retrieve","id":"-1962957971"},"keywords":["Research & Travel Grants Conferences","Workshops","Networking Opportunities"],"sieverID":"5868d61a-8a5b-4ffd-88e9-8f3f8f5eda08","content":"PhD studentship -machine learning for sustainable chemistry. application deadline: april 10, 2022. Click for details. n King's College PhD studentships in telecommunications, robotics, mechanical engineering, informatics, electronic engineering, and computer science subject areas. application deadline: april 11, 2022. Click for details. n CSIRO postdoctoral fellowship in food system transformation: constraints and barriers to change. application deadline: april 14, 2022. Click for details. n OWSD PhD fellowships for women scientists from science and technology-lagging countries to undertake PhD research in the natural, engineering, and information technology sciences. application deadline: april 15, 2022. Click for details. n Ghent University -PhD Position in the Center of Molecular Modeling. application deadline: april 15, 2022. Click for details. n Ghent University -PhD Position in Economic Evaluation of policies related to rural development and agriculture. application deadline: april 15, 2022. Click for details. n Coimbra Group Universities -Scholarship program for young African researchers from universities in sub-Saharan Africa. application deadline: april 15, 2022. Click for details. Fellowships, scholarships and internships 2 capacity development photo credit: ilRi"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3983414243.json b/main/part_2/3983414243.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a39c5726ecf571aaac803efaadd3ecb6f6a80491 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3983414243.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"557a7a60ff3619c5839713e6aea90d29","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/Water_Policy_Briefs/PDF/WPB30.pdf","id":"-1082844427"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a2b29fe9-7ea0-4469-8c97-49f259286dc0","content":"Biofuels are being touted as a solution to rising fuel prices, growing energy demands, and the need to curb emissions of greenhouse gases. Governments have good reasons for promoting biofuels. Yet, a headlong rush into growing biofuel crops will bring its own problems. Unless planned properly, biofuel crops are likely to escalate competition for water, especially in areas where it is already scarce.New research shows what options policymakers have for making tradeo s between biofuels and other uses of water. And, biofuel crops that give 'more crop per drop' lessen the negative impacts and boost the positive impacts.Biofuels are attracting a lot of interest. But, policymakers need to understand that growing crops as raw materials for biofuel will have a major impact on water resources, on agricultural production and food prices, on jobs and incomes in rural areas, and on the environment (Box 1). How biofuels will a ect these must be considered before going ahead (Box 2). Are the tradeo s worth making? Researchers have come up with a range of options to help policymakers strike the right balance.• Rising oil prices • Energy security concerns • Boosting jobs and incomes in rural areas • Lowering greenhouse gas emissions• Water is essential to grow biofuel crops. Most biofuel crops are thirsty and compete for already scarce water. • Clearing land and forests for biofuel crops releases carbon and reduces biodiversity. • Crops such as maize and wheat used as raw materials for biofuel rather than for food mean less food and higher prices. • Energy from biofuel isn't cheap. Biofuel production is still mostly subsidized.Many studies have been done to help policymakers develop policies for water, land, agriculture and the environment. But these studies have not taken into account what kinds of impact growing crops for biofuel might have.The Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture concluded that the world's water resources are enough-with the right policies and better water management -to feed the world, cut poverty and look after the environment. Now, new research highlights some of the problems of growing biofuel crops in areas where water is already scarce.Maize and sugarcane, grown to produce biofuel crops, need a lot of water. This will add to already erce competition for water from domestic users, industry, agriculture and the environment. It's already di cult to meet existing water demand in parts of Asia where water resources are overstretched and in sub-Saharan Africa where populations are growing. Allotting a share of water to biofuel crops in such cases could cause even more friction.If countries go ahead with their policies and plan to produce biofuels, 180 cubic kilometers of additional irrigation water will be needed. In some areas this won't put too much stress on water supplies. Biofuel crops in rainfed regions have little direct e ect on existing water allocations. But, ambitious plans in China and India to boost domestic production of biofuels raise serious concerns for future water supplies if traditional food crops-maize in China and sugarcane in India-are used (Table 1). Because of this, both countries are already looking at biofuel crops that use less water and do not compete directly with food crops.In rainfed areas, biofuel crops use 'green water' (water stored in the soil). But, if they use this green water more intensively than traditional land uses, biofuel crops may reduce the amount of water that ends up as 'blue water' in groundwater aquifers and rivers in the long run. River and groundwater systems wouldWater, food, energy, environment and rural livelihoods-are all linked therefore be a ected, although there is still a lot of uncertainty as to just how the production of energy crops might a ect river ows downstream.Table 1. A fourfold increase in biofuel crops between 2005 and 2030 raises serious concerns for water supplies. Although the additional irrigation water needed to grow biofuel crops is just a few percent of the global total, the impacts in some countries could be highly signi cant, with serious implications for water resources. Rapidly growing economies such as China and India are unlikely to be able to meet future biofuel and food demands without greatly aggravating water scarcity, unless alternative feedstocks are used.Biofuels are mainly produced from food crops such as wheat, maize, sugarcane, sugar beet and oil seeds. If, instead of being grown for food these crops are grown to supply raw material for biofuel, this may mean less food is produced and food prices rise. And a switch from an industrial crop, such as cotton, to a biofuel crop can have a large impact on livelihoods (Box 2).In Ethiopia, the spread of sugarcane as a biofuel crop in irrigated regions, and other biofuel crops in rainfed areas, could boost energy production and farmers' incomes. But there would be serious consequences for water use, food prices and rural livelihoods. Many sugarcane estates in the Blue Nile region already generate their own electricity using bagasse. In some cases, ethanol is produced and blended with kerosene to make K-50, a fuel used in factories and homes. But, increasing the area of sugarcane as a biofuel crop would oust cotton. Not only would this mean less water for other food crops and thus higher food prices, but many jobs, both farm and non-farm, and Ethiopia's nascent textile industry, would disappear. Plus, pastoralists would no longer be able to graze their animals on cotton stubble.Source: McCornick et al. 2008 While biofuels can provide jobs and new sources of income for the rural poor, particularly smallholders, poor urban consumers could su er higher food prices. And, even though 70% of the poor live in rural areas, the overall negative impact of higher food prices may outweigh the positive impacts of higher returns for their food and biofuel crops.But the change from growing food crops to growing crops for biofuel is only one factor in pushing up food prices. Rising energy prices push up the costs of food production. Trade barriers, subsidies, policies and marketing infrastructure are other factors a ecting food prices. The debate on biofuels must take into account the tradeo s between using water to produce raw materials for biofuel, and using water for other purposes. Tradeo s will need to minimize the negative impacts while enhancing the positive.Biofuel crops such as jatropha trees (used for biodiesel) and sweet sorghum (Box 4) can be grown in rainfed areas and, as well as needing much less water than conventional biofuel, can open up opportunities for small farmers and those on marginal land. But, policymakers will need to make sure that entrepreneurs wanting to get into biofuel crops don't push small farmers o their land and, if common land is taken over, that the people who use it don't lose out. Another factor to take into account is that these new biofuel crops may be risky. Not much is known yet about how jatropha, for example, will cope with drought or pests. Plus, small farmers going into biofuel crops will be vulnerable to volatile fuel prices in world markets. In terms of water, it makes a di erence where biofuel crops are grown. For example, a liter of ethanol made from irrigated sugarcane in India needs more than 25 times as much irrigation water as a liter of ethanol made from mostly rainfed sugarcane in Brazil (Table 3). Policymakers need to encourage farmers to grow biofuel crops under rainfed rather than irrigated conditions. Not only could such a policy boost agricultural returns in rainfed areas but, provided food crops aren't displaced, the impact on food production would be minimal. More e ective water policies and more e cient water institutions will be needed to put policies for better water use in place. The water sector already faces con icts between environmental goals on the one hand and food and livelihood goals on the other. Biofuel crops are likely to add to these. The issue of how to resolve these con icts with acceptable tradeo s is going to be a major concern for policymakers in developing regions, particularly in Asia and Africa (Box 3). Policymakers concerned about climate change are looking to biofuels as a key means of cutting greenhouse gas emissions. But, producing biofuels won't help countries reduce their greenhouse gas emissions if they clear their forests to make room for energy crops, or disturb or burn peaty soils in the process-this will lead to an increase in carbon emissions-not a decrease.Policymakers need to encourage farmers to grow biofuel crops under rainfed rather than irrigated conditions. Policymakers should look for opportunities for synergies between biofuel crops and other goals. One good example is a scheme for growing biofuel crops and, at the same time, protecting watersheds (Box 5).In 10 to 20 years, new ways of making ethanol, for example, from waste straw and wood chippings using enzymes, may become cost-e ective. These will typically take less water than those using traditional energy crops. Policymakers' support for speeding up the development of new and more e cient technologies is going to be important.One of the reasons for turning to biofuels is to reduce emissions. But emissions will increase, not decrease, if forests are cleared to make room for biofuel crops and peaty soils are burned or disturbed. Policymakers should ensure that biofuel crops are only grown where this will not happen. They also need to consider how much it costs to produce and transport biofuels. Will it be cost-e ective?Box 5. Smallholder schemes protect watersheds and produce biodiesel Production of biofuels and watershed protection can go hand in hand. In Andhra Pradesh, India, a watershed development project is helping poor villagers grow pongamia and jatropha, both raw materials for biodiesel, on 'wastelands' . The scheme gives landless villagers rights to use and pro t from biodiesel tree crops planted to rehabilitate 300 hectares of degraded common land in Velchal and Kothlapur, Ranga Reddy district.Source: Pro-Poor Biofuels Outlook for Asia and Africa: ICRISAT's Perspective."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3985157684.json b/main/part_2/3985157684.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f04440affa8fc9751d6dc93ed5189c5855a4f932 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3985157684.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"15a3dd6b15bdd8808a12482ecf7bc547","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9b00dfbd-528e-430c-ac07-eb10fd6ae186/retrieve","id":"-358754812"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"53d53d89-848a-4491-a15a-be1304dc3c4e","content":"A relatively large body of literature has documented the welfare effects of smallholder farmers' participation in single-commodity output markets. However, limited empirical evidence is available when smallholder farmers participate in multiple-commodities output markets. We tried to fill this gap in the literature by estimating the impacts of smallholder farmers' contemporaneous participation in both maize and legume markets vis-à-vis in only maize or legume markets using household-level data from Tanzania. Applying a multinomial endogenous switching regression model that allows controlling for observed and unobserved heterogeneity associated with market participation in single-commodity and multiplecommodity markets, results showed that smallholder farmers' participation in both singleand multiple-commodity markets was positively and significantly associated with household income and food security. Moreover, the greatest benefits were obtained when farmers participated in multiple-commodity markets, suggesting the importance of policies promoting diversification in crop income sources to increase welfare and food security. Our findings also signal the complementary-rather than substitute-nature of accessing multiple-commodity markets for enhancing household livelihoods under a specialization strategy. Finally, important policy implications are suggested, from promoting and supporting public infrastructure investments to expanding road networks to reduce transportation costs, especially in remote communities, to enhance smallholder farmer access to profitable maize and legume markets in Tanzania.In Africa, south of the Sahara (SSA), North Africa, and the Middle East, more than 30% of the population shows poor market access and, specifically, SSA is immensely disadvantaged in infrastructure, thereby facing high transaction costs and market risks [1]. Good road infrastructure is often associated with better access to markets, which translates into lower transport costs, enhanced agricultural production, non-farm diversification, income, and food security [2][3][4]. The reduced transaction costs associated with better access to markets will inevitably lead to an increase in market participation, the number of crops produced, and the quantity of produce sold. Several studies support the positive relationship between market participation and household income [e.g., [5][6][7][8][9]. For example, [10] demonstrated that vegetable commercialization is positively and statistically significantly related to household income in Kenya. Similarly, [11] demonstrated that commercialization led to a reduction of income based as well as multidimensional poverty among smallholder farmers in Kenya. [6] also found that participation in the maize and pigeon pea markets in Tanzania had led to an increase in consumption expenditure, ranging from 19% to 29%.While there are several studies on the household income effects of smallholder farmers' participation, there are relatively few studies that have examined the relationship between market participation and food/nutrition security [e.g., [7][8][9]12]. More importantly, most of these studies assessed the welfare impacts of smallholder farmers' participation in a single-output market, overlooking the fact that most African smallholder farmers manage a farming system of multiple enterprises through interdependent decision-making process.Maize and legumes are the most important staple commodities in Tanzania, with, maize accounting for nearly 33% of caloric intake. Tanzania is also the largest producer and net exporter of common beans in Africa [13,14]. The synergy between the production of maize and legumes is not limited only to cash flow but also to soil nutrient flow as maize is intercropped or relay-cropped with legumes.We specifically consider maize and legume markets as multiple-output markets because of the double role of these crops for home consumption and market sales. Smallholder farmers produce maize and legumes as a strategy of stable cash flow and risk management, regardless of their level of market integration. In the past, maize and legumes were produced primarily for home consumption and income sources, respectively. However, as smallholder farmers started using improved maize technologies and marketing production surplus, maize sales turned out to be a major income source, complementing income from legumes. For example, as legume harvest occurs before maize harvest, farmers can earn from legume sales so that they can decide to delay maize sales along the agricultural season, benefiting from higher maize prices later in the season given their relatively greater variability than legume prices. This strategy provides not only steadier cash flow, but also more stable maize availability for home consumption.In this paper, we aim to fill this gap in the literature by assessing the impact of smallholder farmers' participation in multiple-output markets compared to single-output markets using multiple outcome variables (total household expenditure, food expenditure, household dietary diversity [HDD], duration of food insecurity [months], and household food insecurity access scale [HFIAS]). We contribute to the literature by assessing the income and food security impacts of smallholder farmers' contemporaneous participation in maize and legume markets vis-à-vis in only maize or legume market. To this end, we specify the instrumental variable (IV) based multinomial endogenous switching regression (MESR) model that allows controlling for observed and unobserved heterogeneity associated with market participation in singleoutput (maize or legume) and multiple-output (maize and legume) markets. The model is applied in a simultaneous framework using household-level data from Tanzania. This is a point of departure from most previous studies -e.g., [5,6]-, which assessed the determinants and impacts of maize and pigeon pea market participation on consumption expenditure in Tanzania. As a robustness check for the MESR model, we also estimate the multivalued inverse probability weighted regression adjustment (MIPWRA) model. It provides efficient estimates by allowing the modelling of the outcome and the treatment equations while requiring that only one of the two models be correctly specified to consistently estimate the impact owing to their double-robust property [15].The rest of the article is organized as follows. The next section describes the data and sampling strategy, while Section 3 presents the definitions of market participation, household income, and food security. Section 4 describes the conceptual and empirical frameworks. The penultimate section presents the results and discussion, and the last section draws conclusions and policy recommendations.We use micro-level data from a sample of 810 farm households conducted in two districts (Babati and Kiteto) in Manyara region and one district (Kongwa) in Dodoma region of Tanzania in 2014, which is the baseline evaluation survey of the Africa Research In Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) project. The survey, based on a cluster quasi-randomized control trial design, collected baseline information among three farmers' groups with their associated household members: a) Africa RISING participant farmers -that is, farmers who directly participate in Africa RISING activities in different ways such as by hosting and/or managing on-farm trials-, including 435 households in seven intervention villages; b) Africa RISING non-participant farmers including 105 households in the same seven intervention villages; and c) control farmers including 270 households in 18 non-intervention villages. Non-intervention villages were selected following a constrained randomization, hence randomly chosen among the universe of villages within the same agro-ecological zone as the seven intervention villages, but far from them to prevent the possibility of contamination. The household questionnaire was a multi-topic instrument specifically designed to collect information on the project's core topics, such as food security and nutrition, poverty, livelihoods, agricultural production, productivity, and practices. The survey instrument was administered in two visits using computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI).\"Data were collected using a household survey and were analyzed anonymously. Survey participants were randomly selected among the Africa RISING project beneficiaries and control group. All participants received a clear explanation of the survey objectives and were asked for their verbal informed consent to willingly participate in the study. If respondents declined to be interviewed, the reasons for their refusal were also recorded, and no respondent was forced to participate in the survey. Prior to conducting the study, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Internal Review Board approved the study on 8/21/2013 with the approval letter available upon request.\"In line with the theoretical market participation model developed by [16], a household is classified as a market participant if any of its members has sold any positive amount of maize and legumes during the last cropping season. Participation in maize and legume markets results in four (2 2 ) different market choices i.e. non-market participation (M 0 L 0 ), participation in maize market only (M 1 L 0 ), participation in legume market only (M 0 L 1 ), and participation in both maize and legume markets (M 1 L 1 ) (Table 1). Legumes include groundnut, common beans and all the remaining pulses (e.g., soybean, pigeon pea, chickpeas etc.).On average, about 28% of the households participated neither in maize nor in legume market, while 40% participated in both maize and legume markets. Relatively few farmers sold legumes (11%) compared with 20% of the farmers who sold maize, and this finding may also have implications for income and food security.In this study, we use total household expenditure as a proxy for household income. Total household expenditure includes food and non-food consumption expenditure incurred by the household during the previous 12 months. Household income is mainly used as an indicator of household wellbeing [e.g., [17][18][19], although some studies have used it as a food security indicator [e.g., 20,21].The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) defined food security as a \"situation that exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life\" [22]. This definition encompasses the four dimensions of food security, i.e., food availability, access, utilization, and stability. In our study, food security is measured by four indicators: household food expenditure, dietary diversity, number of months of food insecurity, and HFIAS. Food expenditure is an indicator of economic vulnerability: households that spend a large percentage of their income on food are more susceptible to food scarcity because a reduction in their income would most likely lead to a reduction in food consumption or quality of food eaten [23]. Food expenditure includes food purchased, own-consumption, and food received as gift or in-kind payment or exchange. Previous studies have used food expenditure as an indicator of food security [e.g., [24][25][26].Dietary diversity is defined as the number of different unique food items or food groups consumed over a given reference period [27]. Dietary diversity was initially developed as an indicator of quantity and quality of food access [28], although it is also a proxy for diet quality [25,29]. Some studies have used it even to measure food utilization [25]. In this study, we used the household dietary diversity score (HDDS) as an indicator of dietary diversity. As part of the survey, households were asked to report the food items they had consumed over the seven days before the interview. Items included cereals, roots and tubers, vegetables, livestock products, fruits, beverages, and condiments, classified into 12 food groups based on the guidelines provided by [29]. The HDDS expresses how many of the 12 food groups encompass food items consumed by any household member over the reference period. Hence, the HDDS ranges from 1 to 12.The number of months of food insecurity measures the length of time during which the household had a shortage of food to feed its members [30]. This is considered a self-reported measure of food (in)security, is based on perceptions of a general condition rather than on quantitative measurement. Finally, the HFIAS, developed through the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA), is one of the widely used measures of household access to food and the degree of anxiety involved in its acquisition [31]. The HFIAS questions capture information on food shortage, food quantity, and quality of diet to determine the status of household access to food, proxying the general experience of food insecurity in the household [32]. The HFIAS ranges from 0 to 27, such that the higher the score, the more severe the food insecurity experienced [31].In many African countries, including Tanzania, smallholder farmers usually face imperfect input and output markets. Markets fail because farmers face proportional and fixed transaction costs such as long distances to the market, poor infrastructure that increase transportation costs, high marketing margins due to traders with local monopoly power, high search and recruitment costs and imperfect information, among others [33][34][35]. The differences in the marketing margins among smallholders arising from differential access to assets and services might explain the underlying heterogeneous market participation among them [36]. Because the transaction costs drive a wedge between household buying and selling prices [37], many households fail to participate in profitable markets. When households do not participate in markets, production and consumption decisions are non-separable [33].Smallholders' production and consumption decisions are non-separable because they produce both for consumption and sale, i.e., goods are both supplied and demanded by the same household. Thus, smallholders' market participation decisions are best analyzed using nonseparable household models. In a non-separable household model (as opposed to a separable model), the consumption and production decisions are linked through endogenous market prices and factors influencing transaction costs in the markets [35]. We, therefore, follow earlier work in the vein by [16,33,38] in viewing the decision to sell maize and legumes from the perspective of the non-separable household model, in which family members organize their labour to maximize utility over a bundle of consumption goods produced on the farm or purchased from the market, subject to an income constraint generated by a combination of farm production, sales, and non-farm earnings. According to [16], the decision to participate in the market may depend on public goods and services (e.g., a radio broadcast of prices that affects search costs and road accessibility to market), household characteristics (e.g., age, education, and sex), household assets and access to non-farm income inter alia.Nevertheless, the decision to participate in maize and legume markets may be endogenous as farmers may self-select into market participation based on both observable and unobservable characteristics. These characteristics may be systematically correlated with the outcome variables of interest, thereby leading to biased estimates. To account for any possible endogeneity, we model the single and joint decisions to participate in maize and legume markets in a multinomial framework. Using the MESR model, we proceed in two steps. In the first step, the decision to participate in the market (single and joint) is modelled using a multinomial logit selection model. In the second step, the impacts on our outcome variables of interest are estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS) with selectivity correction terms.It is envisaged that the cash income obtained from participating in maize and legume markets will contribute to household income, which will translate into more food purchases (quantity and diversity), thereby leading to improved household food security and nutrition [9,39]. It is generally believed that market participation leads to specialization in producing crops (usually cash crops) where they have a comparative advantage. However, [40] showed that on-farm diversification through intercropping a food and cash crop reduced market transaction costs borne by rural households and communities. Similarly, [41] found that integration into output markets was positively associated with a diversification of land use away from rice monoculture in Thailand. Therefore, considering the numerous risks that accompany smallholder agricultural production in developing countries, it is plausible to expect that farmers who jointly participate in the maize and legume markets have better welfare outcomes than those who participated in either of the two markets.We assume that farmers aim to maximize their utility U im by comparing the utility provided by alternative market choices, U ik such that a farmer will choose a combination of market participation alternatives, m over any alternative k if U im >U ik , k 6 ¼ m. Following, [42], let U � im denote the indirect utility associated with the mth choice, m = 1. . .4 for household i such that:where X i is a vector of exogenous covariates (e.g., age, education, sex, assets, and market access) and ε im is the idiosyncratic unobserved stochastic component. Even though the utility of participating in the maize and legume market is not observable, we observe the decision to participate in these markets such that a farmer will choose a combination of markets m over any other market k if:whereAssuming that ε im are independent and identically Gumbel distributed, that is, under the independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) hypothesis, [43], then as shown by [44], Eq 1 leads to the multinomial logit model. In the multinomial logit model, the probability that a household i will choose market m can be expressed as:Based on the expression in Eq 3, consistent maximum likelihood estimates can be obtained [43].In the second stage, we apply the [43] selection bias correction model to examine the relationship between each market participation choice (Table 1) and food security. This implies that households face a total of four regimes, with m = 1 as the reference category i.e. non-market participation. The income and food security outcome equation for each possible regime (m) can then be expressed as:where y im is the household income and food security of the ith farmer in regime m; Z represents a set of exogenous explanatory variables (e.g., household and farm-level characteristics and location variables) and η im are the error terms distributed with E (η im |X,z) = 0 and varðZ im jX; zÞ ¼ s 2 m . The outcome variables are only observed if and only if one of the possible market participation combinations is used [42,45]. Some unobservable factors that influence the probability to participate in the market could also influence income and food security, thereby leading to non-zero covariances between the error terms of the market participation equation, ε im and the outcome equation, η im . Therefore, the error terms in Eq (4), conditional on the sample selection criterion, have non-zero expected values, and OLS estimates will not be consistent. Consistent estimation of β m requires the inclusion of the selection correction terms of the choices in Eq 4. Following [45], the selectivity term or inverse mills ratio (IMR) (which can be computed from Eq 3) can be defined as:Where ρ is the correlation between ε mi and u im . In the multinomial choice setting, there are m−1 selection correction terms, one for each alternative market participation combination. Following [46], we incorporate the selectivity terms (λ) into Eq (4) to account for selection bias such that:where σ is the covariance between ε im and u im ; and v im is the error term with an expected value of zero. Although in principle, the parameters of the model can be identified using the non-linearities generated through the model (i.e., the IMR), we use exclusion restrictions or instruments for a more robust identification [47]. To achieve this, we need an instrumental variable (IV) correlated with the decision to participate in the market but does not determine income and food security, conditional on participation. We use the average number of motorcycles and bicycles (hereinafter \"transport equipment\") owned by households living in the same ward as the farmer himself/herself. A ward is an administrative structure or local authority area for a single town or portion of a bigger town (urban wards) which is smaller than a district. Rural wards are composed of several villages.We constructed this instrument following [9,11]. First, we counted the number of transport equipment owned by sample households in each ward but excluding the household in question. After that, we divided this number by the number of sample households in each ward, giving us a proportion of households with transport equipment in the ward. Averaging the number of transport equipment in a ward as opposed to individual ownership ensures that the instrument is not directly correlated with our household income and food security variables. The number of transport equipment in the ward implies better market access because in developing countries, most of the local roads are not paved and public transport may not exist; hence, owners of transport equipment often offer transport services to other households living in the same area [9,11]. Studies that have used similar instruments include [9,11,48,49]. Coupled with this intuitive justification, we also conducted a test to assess the suitability of this instrument. We followed [42] in performing a falsification test: if a variable is a valid selection instrument, it will affect the market participation decision, but it will not affect the income and food security among farm households that did not participate in the markets. Results of the test confirm that in all cases that our instrument is significant in the market participation equations (Table 3) but not in the income and food security equation among the non-market participants (A1 Table in S1 Appendix). Although our constructed instrument satisfies all the post estimation tests, including using a rich cross-sectional dataset, our instrument can still be contested. For example, the exogeneity condition might not be satisfied should households with relatively higher welfare be more likely to reside in wards where neighboring households own a larger number of motorbikes and bicycles. While the consistency of the results across the two methods we use in the paper support evidence of impact, the results should still be interpreted with some caution.In the present study, of significant interest is the effect of market participation on income and food security outcomes. Specifically, we use the MESR framework mentioned above to derive the expected actual and counterfactual income and food security outcomes. Following [45] and [47] the expected food security under the actual scenario for each choice is computed as follows:The expected food security value of the same farmer had he/she chosen not to participate in any market (i.e. the counterfactual) is given as:Thus, the difference in expected outcomes between Eqs (7A) and (7B) is the unbiased average treatment effect on the treated (ATT)-which measure the impact of market participation for the households who participated in the market-and this is given as:This approach postulates that unobserved factors have differential effects on participants and non-market participants, hence taking the differences in effects, i.e. σ m −σ 1 , while holding lim constant ensures that the effects of unobserved factors are cancelled out [50].The MESR is strictly dependent on the availability of an instrument satisfying several econometric requirements for exogeneity, validity, and strength for the identification of the model, however finding an instrument with these characteristics in practice is difficult. Even though evidence shows that the instrument we have identified in Section 4.2.1 satisfies all the required conditions, there is a possibility that the model may still not be properly identified and, as such, we complement the MESR model with the MIPWRA model, which in any case only accounts for observed characteristics. This algorithm uses the inverse of the estimated treatment probability weights to estimate missing data-corrected regression coefficients that are subsequently used to produce robust estimates of ATT.The estimation of the model proceeds in two steps. In the first step, the parameters of the propensity score model (market participation or treatment model) are estimated using a multinomial logit model, after which the inverse probability of treatment weights are calculated for each level of treatment. In the second step, using the estimated weights, the income and food security models are fitted by a weighted regression for each treatment level, and treatment-specific predicted outcomes for each household are obtained using the estimated coefficients from this weighted regression model [51]. The model is finally estimated using generalized methods of moments (GMM) in one step which has the advantage of automatically accounting for the estimation error from the estimated propensity scores when deriving the standard errors.For the sake of brevity, we are not going to present all the details of the model, but [51][52][53][54] give details on the derivation of the MIPWRA model, while [55] describe the theory for semiparametric estimators. We can define the average treatment for the households who participated in the maize and legume markets (ATT) as:Where y ti is the potential outcome (income and food security) that household i would obtain given treatment-level t. The t, in this case, is analogous to m above where t = 1. . .4 for household i. In the multivalued treatment case, the ATT requires three different treatment levels: t defines the treatment level of the treated potential outcome; 0 is the treatment level of the control potential outcome, and; t ¼ t ! restricts the expectation to include only those individuals who receive treatment level t ! . As with all models based on observed characteristics, the MIPWRA relies mainly on two assumptions for the results to be valid. The first assumption is the conditional independence assumption (CIA), which postulates that the treatment assignment is essentially randomized conditional on observables. This assumption implies that the potential outcome distributions are independent of the treatment level. Therefore, it rules out that some unobservable factor correlated with treatment assignment affects the potential-outcome distributions [56]. Unfortunately, there no formal tests to test whether this assumption holds in our case. The second assumption is the overlap assumption which ensures that each household could receive any treatment level. In the subsequent sections, we test the overlap assumption using density distributions to assess whether balancing was achieved using the MIPWRA model.Table 2 below provides descriptive statistics of the variables used in the study. Results indicate that, on average, households spent about Tsh 363,708 in the year preceding the survey on food and non-food items, split almost equally among the two categories.The average HDDS is eight -out of 12-signaling a relatively high diversity overall, and it is in line with the value found by [57]. On average, households indicate that they have experienced about 0.5 months of food insecurity over the past 12 months.Over 85% of the households are headed by males. A typical household has about three adults in the working age category -between 15 and 59 years old-, a proxy of labor availability in the household for production and marketing activities [58,59]. On average, households cultivate 2.4 ha and own a herd size of about three tropical livestock units (TLU). About one in four households reports not having access to credit, which is crucial to lessen food risks related to uncertain cash flow and food crop prices [35].The percentage of households who apply organic fertilizers and practice intercropping is 56% and 98%, respectively, with the use and adoption of such technologies affecting maize and legume productivity that in turn positively affect famers' marketable surplus [38]. The latter can be effectively translated into substantial income benefits given the relatively high accessibility to markets. On average, farmers in our sample need to travel just 8 minutes to access a tarred road-. The market access variable is proxied by the travel time required to reach the nearest urban center, defined as a contiguous area with 1,500 or more inhabitants per square kilometer or as a majority of built-up land cover coincident with a population center of at least 50,000 inhabitants [60]. The relatively high accessibility reported is also a function of ownership of motorbikes or bicycles, given that about 63% of the households in each ward owns either a motorbike or bicycle.To gain an initial insight into the relationship between market participation and food security, Fig 1 presents the data distribution using strip plots. The plots show the distributions of income and food security by each market participation category with the associated cumulative probabilities. Farmers who participate in either maize or legume market report higher income and better food security than non-participants. Moreover, income and food security distribution functions for market participants dominate those for non-participants. Overall, households that participate in joint maize and legume markets report the highest food security outcomes. A2 between the mean outcomes of the joint market participants and the other market participations. However, the average number of months of food insecurity and HFIAS were only marginally lower for joint maize and legume participants relative to non-market participants. However, these descriptive findings are only bivariate unconditional relationships, since we did not control for other characteristics that might affect the outcome variables, which we will do in our multinomial regression framework.5.2.1 Determinants of maize and legume market participation. Table 3 presents the parameter estimates from the multinomial logit model described in Section 4, i.e., the first stage results of the MESR model. The standard errors reported are corrected for intra-cluster correlation at the village level, given the sampling design and the expected correlation of the characteristics across households within each village. Consistently with our a priori expectations, results show that education, amount of time the household head spent within the household -a proxy for labor availability-, amount of cultivated land, and the index of ownership of agricultural implements are all positively related to the joint participation in maize and legume markets. Labor, land, and assets are the factors of production enabling farmers to produce a marketable surplus [36,61]. Farmers who obtained credit show a higher propensity to participate in maize and legume markets, as the literature also finds -e.g., [36] for Kenya-. Surprisingly, ownership of mobile phones traditionally and empirically associated with increased market participation [5,62] seems to be negatively related to joint participation in maize and legume markets, likely due to the lack of use of mobile phones in trade business that occurs on the spot market and with random traders instead of by phone.The use of organic fertilizers and intercropping is usually positively correlated with marketable surplus given they enhance maize and legume productivity [63]. Results in Table 3 show that the adoption of organic fertilizers and intercropping indeed increase participation in the legume market only and legume and maize markets, in line with [64] who find that legume sellers are more likely to practice intercropping in Malawi. In line with expectations, the occurrence of droughts reduces market participation via lower production of maize and legumes.Distance to a tarred road and urban center are negatively associated with maize and legume market participation because of the increased transaction costs, with this finding consistent across market participation options. As expected, the prevalence of transportation durable assets in a ward affects the likelihood of participating in all markets, likely due to the reduction in transportation costs and enhanced opportunities in more distant and profitable markets [11,36,61].Looking at the geographical heterogeneity, farmers in the Manyara region are more likely to participate in maize and legume markets than those in the Dodoma region. The former is considered a high agricultural potential area with good climatic conditions, ideal for maize and legume cultivation unlike the latter. On the other hand, Dodoma is a semi-arid region also prone to soil erosion and flooding, and hence farmers can attain only a relatively low marketable surplus. This strongly negative relationship between climate risk and market exposure is also consistent with [61], who find that areas with higher climatic risks are associated with less commercialization in Mozambique.Table 4 displays the average effect of maize and legume market participation on household welfare indicators based on the estimation of Eq 8. Results show that participation in single and joint markets leads to a statistically significant increase in many of the outcome variables considered. Total household expenditure increases due to participation in maize-only market is 12% higher than that of market non-participation. More importantly, joint participation in maize and legume markets results in a 31% increase in household expenditure. A similar trend is observed for food expenditure, with the joint market participation showing the highest percentage increase of 24% compared to the counterfactual group. Previous studies [e.g., [65][66][67] show that purchased foods contribute substantially to total calorie consumption in most developing countries, even among subsistence farmers.Compared with counterfactuals, for farmers participating in maize-only markets, HDDS increases by 5% while the number of months of food insecurity reduces by 27%. Participation in the legume-only market is also associated with a 5% gain in HDDS. Similarly, participation in the maize market-only reduces the HFIAS scores by 28%. For all our food security indicators, the highest gains are associated with joint maize and legume market participation. For instance, HDDS increases by 6% due to joint participation in the two markets, a higher effect than participation in either maize-only or legume-only market. Likewise, joint participation in maize and legume markets reduces the number of months of food insecurity and HFIAS by 41% and 66% respectively. Interestingly, except for the HFIAS, the positive effects of maizeonly market participation are generally higher than those accruing from legume-only market participation, likely due to the dominance of maize as a staple food in the Tanzanian diet.We also estimate the ATT using the MIPWRA model (based on Eq 9) as a robustness check for our MESR results. ATT results are valid if they are drawn from observationally identical groups according to the propensity score, which synthetically summarizes the likelihood of the samples under analysis being comparable. A1 Fig in S1 Appendix shows that the overlap assumption of our groups is indeed satisfied after propensity score reweighting. Parameter 5 indicate that joint market participation in maize and legume markets is associated with the largest gains in income and food expenditure. Consistent with estimates in Table 4, MIPWRA results show that participation in maize-only markets increases HDDS by 7%, while it reduces the number of months of food insecurity and HFIAS by 40% and 34%, respectively, compared with market non-participants. However, joint participation in maize and legume markets increases HDDS by 12% and reduces the number of food-insecure months and HFIAS by 63% and 85%, respectively. These results suggest that additional benefits are obtained when farmers simultaneously participate in maize and legume markets compared with single-commodity market participation. MIPWRA estimates are quantitatively slightly larger than those from the MESR model, owing to the underlying lack of the former in controlling for unobserved heterogeneity. Nevertheless, the similar magnitude of MIPWRA and MESR parameter estimates provides overall confidence in our multivariate regression framework specification.In this study, we examine the effect of market participation on household income and food security in three districts across two regions in Tanzania using socio-agro-economic household survey data. Univariate descriptive statistics point towards a statistically significant difference in the average characteristics of joint maize and legume participants vis-à-vis participants in single maize or legume markets. To control for possible confounding factors and likely endogeneity intervening in the relationship between market participation and welfare outcomes in an econometric framework, we employ the multinomial endogenous switching regression model, complemented with the multivalued inverse probability weighted regression model, which is doubly-robust allowing one of the equations -treatment status or outcome prediction-to be misspecified. Results from the first stage regression reveal that the likelihood of contemporaneous participation in the maize and legume markets increases with education, social capital, ownership of land, productive farm assets, adoption of improved technologies, and ownership of transportation equipment. Market participation, however, decreases with the occurrence of droughts. Farm productive assets seem to be crucial in increasing maize and legume productivity; hence provision of credit can enable smallholder farmers to relax liquidity constraints hampering ownership and use of these implements for more productive farming. Similarly, encouraging the adoption of intercropping and organic fertilizer application is vital in increasing maize and legume marketable surplus, thereby increasing market participation.Our results also show that participating in the maize market only increased household income by 12% and food expenditure by 16%, other things being equal. Participation in legume markets leads to quantitatively comparable effects. However, across all the outcome variables considered, our results suggest that farmers who jointly participate in maize and legume markets attain higher income and improved food security than those who participate in either maize or legume market. Smallholder farmers who jointly participate in the two markets spend as much as 24% of their income on food, attained a more diversified diet, and are subject to fewer months of food insecurity over a year.Two main policy implications can be drawn from this study. First, improving the functioning of agricultural markets through the facilitation of market access and reduction in transaction costs is vital for smallholder farmers to fully reap the welfare benefits of market participation in rural Tanzania, as is the case in many similar rural settings in Africa south of the Sahara. Despite the recent construction of a promising development corridor in southern Tanzania, the country is still plagued with poor road infrastructure that hinders farmers from accessing profitable maize and legume markets available in urban centers locking them in poverty. Hence, development programmes and policies aimed at reducing transport and transactions costs, as well as curbing travel time to profitable markets through road network improvement in rural communities are necessary for smallholder farmers to prevent their market and, hence, economic isolation.Second, our findings suggest the need to support policy measures that promote the combined production and marketing of maize and legumes given their strong poverty-alleviation potential shown in our study. These interventions should follow a diversification strategy enhancing maize-legume intercropping and rotation, as opposed to a specialization strategy focusing on one single crop, given the empirical evidence pointing to disproportionately higher income and food security benefits of joint maize and legume market participation. This strategy would also smooth the seasonality of consumption given the different growing periods of the two crops. In areas where vulnerability to climate change and shocks is relatively high, as in most Africa south of the Sahara, participation in multiple-commodity markets would also provide a potential hedge strategy against the risk of price shocks, strengthening household resilience and welfare conditions."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3987040684.json b/main/part_2/3987040684.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..980171aa847acefb49608828b76c2e69710ed5cf --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3987040684.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"833d85cb18efadeefb50bd8cfe537f0c","source":"gardian_index","url":"http://ciat-library.ciat.cgiar.org/Articulos_ciat/epmr/poster_15_empr07.pdf","id":"1304227985"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b5aaf6d9-07ac-4e6b-9df0-55a73b9113c5","content":"Rice blast caused by Pyricularia grisea (Cooke) Sacc., is the most limitant biotic factor for rice production in the world. Although the use of resistance genes is the most important method for blast control, resistance is rarely effective for more than 2-3 years (Correa-Victoria and Zeigler, 1993). Strategies aiming at breeding for durable rice blast resistance have recently focused on the possibility of using a lineage exclusion strategy to target resistance gene combinations that are likely to provide an effective barrier to the fungus (Zeigler et al., 1995). In addition, molecular marker technologies, such as development of closely linked molecular markers, have made it possible to pyramid bacterial blight and blast resistance genes into one rice genotype (Huang et al., 1997;Hittalmani et al., 2000). It has been also indicated, that marker-assisted selection could be particularly useful to improve disease resistance in commercial rice cultivars (Mohan et al., 1997;Sánchez et al., 2000;Chen et al., 2000). Here we report six new markers for the blast resistance gene Pi-1, which were identified using SSR sequences available in public database. Three of these SSR markers resulted highly linked to the resistance gene at the end of rice chromosome 11, therefore, they can be potentially used in MAS to introduce Pi-1 into blast susceptible varieties and to pyramid blast resistant genes to develop commercial varieties with more durable blast resistance.The near-isogenic lines C101LAC (resistant line) and C101A51 (susceptible line) developed at IRRI were crossed and F 1 seeds generated. The F 2 progeny, resulting from self-pollination of F 1 individuals, were self-pollinated to generate CT13432 F 3 lines. Blast disease evaluation was performed according to CIAT's rice pathology laboratory manuals. The inoculum was prepared as described by Correa-Victoria and Zeigler (1993). Plants were evaluated 15 days (two life cycles of the pathogen) after inoculation and scored for resistance and susceptibility (Figure 1) in two replications. The DNA extraction was conducted following the procedure described by Dellaporta et al., (1983). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted according to CIAT standard procedures. The amplification product were loaded on high-resolution agarose gels prepared mixing 1.5 % Sinergel (DiversifieD Biotech), 0.7 % agarose molecular grade (Invitrogen Life Technologies), and containing 0.5mg/mL of ethidium bromide.Genetic analysis of the resistance was conducted measuring the goodness of fit to the expected ratio for a single gene model using a chi-square test. For this purpose, we used F 3 and F 4 segregating populations derived from single F 2 plants with no selection. Putative molecular markers linked to the Pi-1 gene were used in linkage progeny analysis. Associations between SSR markers and the resistance Pi-1 gene were demonstrated using a chi-square test. Linkage analysis was performed using MAPMAKER software on the segregation data obtained from SSR markers and blast resistance scoring of the CT13432 F 3 population. Distances between markers were expressed in Kosambi centiMorgans (cM).Expected and observed segregation ratios for F 3 and F 4 populations are shown in Table 1. The F 3 population analysis showed a good fit to the expected segregation ratio (1:2:1) for a single gene model (χ 2 = 1.0, p < 0.05). This segregation ratio was also confirmed in the F 4 population (χ 2 = 0.1, p < 0.01). Correlation between F 3 and F 4 population ratios reached a value of 0.96 (Spearman range coefficient, p < 0.0001). These results confirmed the hypothesis of a single dominant gene for Pi-1.Sequences of twenty-six SSR markers were selected from the Gramene database (www. gramene.org) considering their relative proximity to Pi-1 gene (located no more than 10cM of the corresponding gene) in the current rice genetic map. The isogenic lines C101LAC and C101A51 and their common genetic background, the susceptible recurrent parent CO39, were used to identify SSR polymorphisms associated to the blast resistance gene. Polymorphic SSR markers identified above were assayed by bulked segregant analysis. DNA bulks were prepared from resistant and susceptible lines within the CT13432 F 3 families inoculated with the isolate Oryzica Yacu 9-19-1. The diagnostic potential of the SSR markers associated to Pi-1 gene was also evaluated on DNA obtained from fifteen elite commercial rice varieties grown in Latin America. Comparing with phenotypic evaluation obtained as indicated above, the veracity of the assay was corroborated.Linkage between the markers and blast resistance was confirmed by screening 157 F 3 lines from the cross C101LAC/C101A51 segregating for Pi-1. Genetic distance between the markers and the Pi-1 locus ranged from 0.0 (no recombination between the marker and resistance factor) to 23.8 cM (Figure 2). Among the SSR makers linked to Pi-1 gene, three markers (RM1233*I, RM5926 and RM224), showing a codominant feature (Figure 3), mapped in the same position (0.0 cM) with the Pi-1 gene. Other three dominant markers corresponding to the same genetic locus (RM7654) were located at 18.5 cM above the Pi-1 gene, while marker RM6094 was identified at 23.8 cM below of the gene. This last SSR marker was characterized by the presence of a band in the susceptible genotype and by the absence of the band in the resistant lines, therefore being not potentially useful for MAS and excluded in further analysis.Near isogenic lines are very useful for identifying highly linked molecular markers to blast resistance genes in rice. Three markers (RM1233*I, RM5926 and RM224) are closely linked (0 cM) to the resistance gene Pi-1. These markers showed a highly sensible and specific, zero value of false positives, and a predictive capacity of the resistance events (PPV) that reached 100 percent. These markers can be used for the selection of resistant sources carrying the Pi-1 resistance gene and to eliminate susceptible germplasm. However, the use of these markers as a diagnostic tool for determining the presence of the resistance gene Pi-1 in a wider range of rice germplasm require additional studies for further confirmation of the results reported here. The speed, simplicity and reliability of PCR based approaches using SSR markers, together with the availability of nucleotide sequence database (www.gramene.org), make SSR analysis an attractive tool for MAS in rice breeding programs aiming at developing durable rice blast resistant cultivars. In order to determine the potential application of these SSR markers in rice breeding programs based on marker-assisted selection, different statistical indicators were calculated (Table 2). All SSR markers were highly sensible and specific, but three of them (codominant markers) also showed zero values of false positive (false resistant) and a predictive capacity of the resistance events (PPV) that reached 100 percent. For this reason, these three markers were selected as putative candidate markers to be used in MAS programs aiming at improving blast resistance in rice.Of the twenty-six microsatellite sequences tested, eleven were polymorphic and seven (27 %) were linked to Pi-1 (all χ 2 values were greater or equal to 128.99, p < 0.0001). Five SSR markers were not polymorphic, and ten, did not amplify with the primer pairs used.To examine whether the markers identified would be of general utility on a wider range of rice germplasm characteristic of applied breeding programs in Latin American, the resistant alleles of five markers were examined in elite rice varieties and compared to the reported inheritance of Pi-1 (Table 3). For this purpose, we used known sources of blast resistance as positive controls and considered as predictive criteria of the resistance, the amplification in each variety of the specific SSR alleles for Pi-1 gene. Comparing with phenotypic data on blast resistance, our results showed that all known sources of resistance (C101LAC, Cica 8, BR IRGA 409, CR 1113, El Paso 144 and Panama 1048) present the specific Pi-1 allele. In addition, four susceptible varieties (Colombia XXI, Epagri 108, Capirona and Oryzica 1) and the negative control (CO-39) had not the resistant allele. On the other hand, other seven varieties (Jucarito-104, Fedearroz 2000, CR 1821, Primavera, Cimarón, Bonanza and Fedearroz 50), which were resistant in the pathogenicity assay, did not show the allele characteristic of the Pi-1 gene, most probably due to the interaction of other resistance genes in these cultivars and the presence of other avirulence genes different to avr-Pi-1 in the blast isolate used in the pathogenecity tests. ( †) Probability that the SRR test were positive (presence of band) if the line was resistant in the pathogenicity test. ( ‡) Probability that the SSR test were negative if the line was susceptible in the pathogenicity test. (FP) Probability that the SSR test were positive given that the line was susceptible. (FN) Probability that the SSR test were negative given that the line was resistant. (PPV) Probability that the line were resistant given that the SSR test was positive. (NPV) Probability that a line were susceptible given that the SSR test was negative. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3988972251.json b/main/part_2/3988972251.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad948c27715efae3b6804d4c820e0677ec9a378b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3988972251.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"fb073bf81a418023ad08745a7381115b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a2b0d4df-91d0-4b1c-853d-baefc101cd96/retrieve","id":"-777890701"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2e9c0bd2-e320-4935-95c4-4cdbddcea533","content":"Berhanu Belay is a Consultant at the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA).Relevance and quality of education are ensured by updating the curriculum with contemporary data and experiences. Universities and staff teaching courses must update the curriculum to make our curriculum need-based and meet the current changes and experiences. Including local data in our teaching and learning documents is an equally important issue. Including local data arouses students' interest and motivation to learn and ensure the relevance of education. A researcher may have data and articles from the research endeavors, and using the same data for teaching and learning eases the understanding of the chapter or the topic in the face of the students. The experience shall also help the teacher make the topic more relevant because the data is generated from the researcher's experience. The case studies could also be picked from the local research outputs, which could ultimately make part of the teaching resources to ensure the relevance of the teaching and learning efforts. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3994768238.json b/main/part_2/3994768238.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee17764791cf5cd983a20e81ff0631ceda97b3a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3994768238.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f1ece351a9c881d4d38dbf075b68226a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/11f65a5b-9476-4a09-9013-34c89d2687d1/retrieve","id":"-1855726814"},"keywords":["banana","banana weevil","continuous mapping","Cosmopolites sordidus","Musa spp.","polyploids","QTL analysis"],"sieverID":"bdeb1754-48b7-460a-8db1-ad283fcfa7fc","content":"The first step toward marker-assisted selection is linking the phenotypes to molecular markers through quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis. While the process is straightforward in self-pollinating diploid (2x) species, QTL analysis in polyploids requires unconventional methods. In this study, we have identified markers associated with weevil Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) resistance in bananas using 138 triploid (2n = 3x) hybrids derived from a cross between a tetraploid \"Monyet\" (2n = 4x) and a 2x \"Kokopo\" (2n = 2x) banana genotypes. The population was genotyped by Diversity Arrays Technology Sequencing (DArTSeq), resulting in 18,009 polymorphic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between the two parents. Marker-trait association was carried out by continuous mapping where the adjusted trait means for the corm peripheral damage (PD) and total cross-section damage (TXD), both on the logit scale, were regressed on the marker allele frequencies. Forty-four SNPs that were associated with corm PD were identified on the chromosomes 5, 6, and 8, with 41 of them located on chromosome 6 and segregated in \"Kokopo.\" Eleven SNPs associated with corm total TXD were identified on chromosome 6 and segregated in \"Monyet.\" The additive effect of replacing one reference allele with the alternative allele was determined at each marker position. The PD QTL was confirmed using conventional QTL linkage analysis in the simplex markers segregating in \"Kokopo\" (AAAA × RA). We also identified 43 putative genes in the vicinity of the markers significantly associated with the two traits. The identified loci associated with resistance to weevil damage will be used in the efforts of developing molecular tools for marker-assisted breeding in bananas.Pests and diseases are the main production constraints for bananas and plantains (Musa spp.) globally (Jones, 2009). Among them, nematodes and weevils constitute the topmost pests, with Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) or banana weevil root borer (henceforth referred to as banana weevil) causing yield losses of up to 50% (Rukazambuga et al., 1998;Gold et al., 2004). Yield losses due to banana weevils worsen with every subsequent ratoon of the plantation due to the build-up of the infestation, and 100% losses can be realized because of complete mat disappearance (Gold et al., 2004). Plantains and East African highland cooking bananas (EAHB), which constitute an important source of food and livelihood in sub-Saharan Africa, are highly susceptible to the pest (Gold and Bagabe, 1997;Gold et al., 2001;Kiggundu et al., 2003;Swennen et al., 2013). Banana weevils have been cited as one of the major factors that have caused production decline and disappearance of East African highland bananas (AAAh) in Central Uganda (Rukazambuga et al., 1998;Gold et al., 1999) and in some littoral regions of Kagera in Tanzania (Mbwana and Rukazambuga, 1998). Therefore resistance to banana weevils is one of the breeding goals for the improvement of these two groups of bananas (Brown et al., 2017).Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) is a beetle that belongs to the subfamily Rhynchophorinae, of the family Curculionidae, of the order Coleoptera (Zimmerman, 1968;Gold et al., 2001). It was first reported as a banana pest in Malaysia as early as 1824 (Zimmerman, 1968). From there, it has spread in almost all the banana-growing regions globally (Gold et al., 2001). Its first report in Africa dates to the early 1900s (Blomme et al., 2013). The reproduction of the banana weevils reduces at temperatures below 12 • C, therefore, their damage is more pronounced in banana plantations at an altitude of 1,000 to 1,300 m above sea level or lower, and rarely above 1,600 m above sea level (Gold and Messiaen, 2000). The damages caused by banana weevils arise from the insect larvae feeding on the corm (the true stem of a banana plant) where they bore tunnels. Although rare, feeding on the pseudostem and banana leaves has also been reported, especially under heavy attacks (VILARDEBO, 1973). Consequently, the tunnels in the corm reduce the uptake of nutrients by the plant, hence reducing the plant vigor and delaying flowering. Injuries to the banana corm due to weevils also serve as an entry point for other soil-borne pests and diseases. Ultimately, the yield is affected through the death of the plants by snapping or toppling, production of small bunches, mat disappearance, and eventually, reduced longevity of the plantation (Rukazambuga et al., 1998;Gold and Messiaen, 2000;Gold et al., 2004).The integrated pest management of the banana weevil includes a combination of cultural, chemical, and biological measures (reviewed by Gold et al., 2001). Among the methods suggested, the use of resistant cultivars is the most sustainable way of controlling banana weevils. Host resistance has been identified in dessert cultivars (AAA) such as \"Yangambi Km5, \" \"Cavendish, \" and \"Gros Michel, \" as well as in some wild and wild-derived diploids (2x) (AA), such as \"Calcutta 4, \" \"TMB2 × 8075-7, \" \"TMB2 × 7197-2, \" and \"TMB2 × 6142-1\" (Ortiz et al., 1995;Kiggundu et al., 2003). Early and more recent genetic studies, such as those by Ortiz et al. (1995) and Arinaitwe et al. (2015), have endeavored to understand the inheritance of weevil resistance using segregating populations. In a multiple-family plantain population (3x × 2x crosses), the first study concluded that resistance to weevils was governed by partially dominant genes from the resistant parent combined with modifier genes with additive and dosage effect from the plantains (susceptible parents). The second study reported a single gene controlling the total corm damage in a progeny from a 2x × 2x cross.Banana improvement relies mainly on classical crossbreeding. This is a three-step process, first focusing on the improvement of the 2x parents from the wild genotypes to get rid of the non-domestication traits. Second, the improved 2x are crossed with triploid (3x) landraces to generate primary tetraploids (4x), and third, the primary 4x are further crossed with the improved 2x to generate secondary 3x hybrids which should combine parthenocarpy with high yield, resistance to pests and diseases, and fruit qualities comparable with those of the original landraces (Lorenzen et al., 2010;Ortiz and Swennen, 2014;Brown et al., 2017). Improved varieties have been developed through this method by a handful number of breeding programs (Tushemereirwe et al., 2015;Tumuhimbise et al., 2016;Dépigny et al., 2018;Tenkouano et al., 2019). However, the process of developing acceptable hybrids is slow, tedious, and expensive, taking up to 2 decades (Batte et al., 2019). One of the main reasons is the long cycle of the crop, which leads to one field evaluation cycle taking 2 to 3 years. Considering the decreasing cost of sequencing-based genotyping, marker-assisted breeding (MAB) has a great potential to improve the efficiency of banana breeding by reducing the breeding cycle by many years (Lorenzen et al., 2011;Nyine et al., 2018).Identifying marker-trait associations by linkage or association studies is the primary step toward the development of markers for MAB. While mapping by linkage or association studies is well-established in 2x organisms, it is less straightforward when the species, such as banana, is cross-pollinating and polyploid. Although the first banana linkage map was published in 1993 (Fauré et al., 1993), quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping in bananas has been slow due to the difficulty in developing and maintaining segregating populations in bananas, the extensive efforts required in phenotyping, and the further level of complexity in distinguishing between homolog and chromosomal linkage groups in polyploids. With the release of the banana reference genomes (D'Hont et al., 2012;Martin et al., 2016;Rouard et al., 2018), molecular research toward MAB in bananas is steadily gaining momentum (Sardos et al., 2016;Nyine et al., 2018Nyine et al., , 2019;;Ahmad et al., 2020).The generation of accurate genotypic and phenotypic data is the foremost important aspect of developing useful tools for MAB through linkage QTL analysis, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), or genomic selection. Unlike 2x species, polyploids are characterized by multiple allelic combinations (dosages) at the heterozygous loci (Bourke et al., 2018b). For instance, five distinct dosages are possible in a 4x at a bi-allelic marker position, ranging from zero to four copies of the alternative allele. With increasing interest in untargeted sequencing-based genotyping (GBS) due to its relatively low cost, tools to accurately determine the allele dosage using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) allele counts are expected to be developed. However, the accurate calling of polyploid genotypes from sequence data requires a sequencing depth of 60x to 80x, estimated in an autotetraploid potato (Uitdewilligen et al., 2013). This would make GBS too expensive for the large-scale genotyping in the study we report, i.e., calling 3x in a banana mapping population of more than 150 segregants.As an alternative approach, Ashraf et al. (2014) proposed to process allele counts to allele frequency estimates and regress the phenotype on the allele-frequencies. This study has shown that, under additivity assumptions, there is a linear relationship between the phenotype and the allele frequency. Therefore, allelefrequency estimates can be used directly, rather than calling genotypes. Hence, a linear regression of the phenotype on the individual allele frequencies, dubbed \"continuous mapping, \" will allow (1) the mapping of QTL and (2) the estimation of the allele substitution effect at each SNP.The purpose of this study was to identify the QTL associated with weevil resistance traits in a 3x F 1 banana progeny derived from a cross between a 4x (\"Monyet\") and a 2x (\"Kokopo\") accessions using the continuous mapping approach. This is the first study ever on marker-trait association in 4x × 2x banana progeny and on weevil resistance in bananas.This study was carried out at the International Institute of Tropical Agricultural (IITA), Sendusu station in Uganda (0 • 31 30 N; 32 • 36 54 E, 1260 m above sea level). A population of 210 F 1 hybrids was generated by crossing \"Monyet\" (ITC1179, female parent) and \"Kokopo\" (ITC1233, male parent) through controlled hand-pollination. \"Monyet\" is a wild banana that belongs to the zebrina subspecies (Musa acuminata). It is known as a diploid banana (2x = 2n = 22) originating from Indonesia (Martin et al., 2020b), but Arinaitwe et al. (2019) reported it as a 4x(2x = 4n = 44). \"Kokopo\" is a traditional 2x cultivar of the M. acuminata ssp. banksii origin (Christelová et al., 2016). From field observations, \"Monyet\" is resistant to C. sordidus, while \"Kokopo\" is susceptible.The ploidy level of the two parents and their hybrids was determined using a flow cytometry method (Dolezel et al., 1997;Christelová et al., 2016). Nucleic DNA was extracted and stained with 4 ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) as described by Karamura et al. (2016). The DNA was analyzed through a ploidy analyzer (CyFlow R Cube 6, Sysmex Partec, Sysmex Partec GmbH). \"Calcutta 4\" (2x = 2n = 22) was used as a reference standard 2x and its G 1 peak was set to channel 200. The 2x, 3x, and 4x levels of all F 1 progeny were determined relative to the peak of \"Calcutta 4, \" with their G 1 peaks set to channels 300 and 400 for the 3x and 4x, respectively.One hundred and forty hybrids together with their parents (\"Monyet\" and \"Kokopo\") and four checks, namely, \"Calcutta-4\" (AA, ITC0249) and \"Yangambi Km5\" (AAA, ITC1123) as resistant checks and two East African cooking banana cultivars, \"Nakyetengu\" and \"Kabucuragye\" (EAHBs, AAAh) as susceptible checks (Kiggundu et al., 2003;Sadik et al., 2010), were screened for their resistance to weevils in a pot experiment. The experiment was set up as described by Sadik et al. (2010).Briefly, healthy suckers from the field were selected, pared, and dipped in boiling water for 15 s, with the time reduced from the recommended 20-30 s due to the small size of the suckers (Coyne et al., 2010). The suckers were planted in 13 L plastic buckets filled up to 3/4 with sterilized top forest soil, manure, and sawdust (3:1:1). Because not all the hybrids had an equal number of suckers at the same time, the experiment was run in four series (batches), with each series containing the two parents and the four checks. Each series was set up as a randomized complete block design of two blocks with four plants per genotype per block. Each bucket was fitted with a net to avoid the natural infestation of weevils, and the plants were watered every other day (three times a week) and were allowed to establish for 8 weeks.Trapping using pieces of banana pseudostems were used to collect weevils from an already established plantation of EAHB (Viljoen et al., 2017). The collected weevils were reared in 30 L buckets containing pared corms of a weevil-susceptible cultivar \"Nakyetengu\" and placed in a cool and dark place. The corms were kept cool by spraying them with water and were changed every 7 days (Viljoen et al., 2017). The male and female weevils were distinguished under a stereomicroscope (K700L, Thomas Scientific) by their morphological features (Gold et al., 2001;Viljoen et al., 2017). Eight weeks after the start of the experiment, 10 weevils (5 males and 5 females) were introduced per plant. Sixty days after the introduction of the weevils, data were collected on corm damage as follows: after uprooting the plants, the corms were pared, and the peripheral damage (PD) was recorded as an estimate of the percentage area damaged by the larvae. Two cross-sections of the corm were generated by cutting at 3 cm (upper cross-section) and 6 cm (lower cross-section) from the collar (Sadik et al., 2010). The corm damage was scored for each cross-section as the percentage of the damaged area of the cortex (upper and lower outer cross-section damage) and the inner cylinder (upper and lower inner cross-section damage). The total cross-section damage (TXD) was estimated by taking the average of the four readings (Sadik et al., 2010). The number of recovered larvae, pupae, and weevils was also recorded per plant.The percentage data (PD and TXD) were logit-transformed before the analysis. The analysis was carried out in Genstat R for Windows TM 20 th Edition (VSN International, 2019). Just like the QTL analysis, continuous mapping requires trait means rather than individual plot (or unit) values from replicated trials. The Preliminary Single Environment Analysis (PSEA) menu, selected from the Stats | QTLs (linkage/association)| Phenotypic Analysis menu in Genstat R helps to produce adjusted trait means from the experimental data. The design was set to \"general.\" The term \"genotype\" was broken into two factors as \"genotype_test\" for the F 1 hybrids and \"genotype_extra\" for the parents and the checks. The PSEA runs two restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses. In the first analysis, the \"genotype_test\" factor was fitted as a random term to estimate the variance parameters and heritability, while \"genotype_extra\" was fitted as a fixed term. In the second analysis, the two genotype factors were fitted as a fixed term and unshrunken predicted means were estimated using variance parameters estimated in the first run. The term \"batch\" was added as an additional fixed term and the term \"replication\" nested within the batches was added as a random term to the two models, both describing the physical structure of the trial.Genotyping was carried out using the genotyping-by-sequencing platform of DArTSeq (DArT R ) 1 at the Biosciences eastern and central Africa -International Livestock Research Institute (BecA -ILRI) under the Integrated Genotyping Service and Support (IGSS) project. The sequencing library was generated using the enzyme PstI. The raw short-read sequences for each sample were obtained as fastq files from IGSS. These short reads were then preprocessed to trim off the barcodes and adapters using the FASTX-Toolkit version 0.0.13 2 . The reads were then aligned to the reference genome sequence, version 2 of the \"DH Pahang\" banana genome (Martin et al., 2016) using Bowtie2 version 2.3.4.1 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012). The genome analysis tool kit (GATK) version 3.7.0. ( Van der Auwera et al., 2013) was used for allele calling per allele dosage using the ploidy information of each genotype. The variant call format (VCF) files generated from the GATK allele calling were filtered for a minor allele frequency of 0.02.For the continuous QTL mapping, genotypes were not explicitly called, but the allele frequencies obtained from the sequence data were directly used for regression analysis (Ashraf et al., 2014). This method was dubbed \"continuous QTL mapping.\" For each individual, reference allele counts from the sequencing reads were processed to the reference allele frequency estimates which were directly used as \"continuous genotypes, \" on which the phenotypes were regressed. The allele frequencies suffer from inaccuracy, which we accounted for by correcting the measurement error as described by Ashraf et al. (2014). For the 3x families, the bias or underestimation in the estimate of the allele effect equals 1 1+ 2 / S T , where S T represents the sequencing depth. The above expression of the bias is derived for a constant sequencing depth across all samples. To account for variable depth across samples, the harmonic mean of the depths per sample was used. A regression of the adjusted trait means for PD and TXD, both on the logit scale, on the marker allele frequencies was performed in Genstat R for Windows TM 20 th Edition (VSN International, 2019). At each marker position, a p-value was calculated, assessing the linear regression together with the estimation of the additive effect of replacing the reference allele with the alternative allele. The \"DH Pahang\" physical map (Martin et al., 2016) was used for the physical ordering of the markers.To confirm the continuous QTL mapping results, a genetic linkage map was constructed for the simplex markers segregating in \"Kokopo\" (2x). These markers were of the AAAA (\"Monyet\") × RA (\"Kokopo\") parental segregation type, with R denoting the reference allele and A the alternative allele. These markers were expected to segregate as AAA (50%) and AAR (50%) in the 3x offspring, thus, allowing the use of the linkage and QTL mapping software available for 2x mapping populations. The F 1 genotypes for these markers were called from the allele counts obtained from the GATK analysis. A maximum likelihood approach was used to infer the genotype for parents and each offspring from the allele counts obtained from the DArTSeq data. At each site j for each individual i, the likelihood for each of the four possible genotypes is given as:where D ij is the observed sequencing data in the individual i at site j, and g ij ∈ {0,1,2,3} is the number of reference alleles contained in the genotype of each individual.To assign a genotype to a particular individual, the likelihood of each of the four possible genotypes was calculated for the individual. The genotype with the highest likelihood was then assigned to an individual when the most likely genotype was 10 times more likely than the second most likely one. Otherwise, a genotype was not called, and the genotype of the individual was considered missing.A linkage map was then constructed with outcrossing (CP) specified as a mapping population using the linkage mapping module in Genstat R for Windows TM 20 th Edition (VSN International, 2019), Linkage grouping was performed at threshold recombination of 0.20. Only linkage groups of at least 10 markers were further analyzed into maps for the QTL mapping in the same software. The option \"Single Trait Linkage Analysis (Single Environment)\" was chosen to perform the genome-wide scans for QTL effects (Simple and Composite Interval Mapping) for logit_PD and logit_TXD. Conditional genotypic probabilities were calculated for every 5 cM based on the Haldane mapping function. The threshold for the QTL detection was set atlog(p) = 2. An initial genome-wide scan by simple interval mapping (SIM) was performed to obtain the candidate QTL positions. The candidate QTL were then used as cofactors in the subsequent composite interval mapping (CIM), i.e., a genomewide scan for QTL effects in the presence of cofactors.The annotation file for all features on the \"DH Pahang\" genome (Version 2) was downloaded from the Banana Genome Hub. 3 The annotation file was converted from a generic feature format (gff3) file to a browser extensible data (bed) file format. The list of the identified SNPs with their physical positions on the genome was used in a bedtools (v2.29.0) query with the function closestBed (Quinlan and Hall, 2010). The query identified the closest gene to the SNP position on either strand. The attributes of identified putative genes were searched in the gene list analysis of the protein analysis through evolutionary relationships gene ontology (PANTHER16.0 4 ) using the M. acuminata spp. malaccensis database (Mi et al., 2020).Ploidy analysis confirmed \"Kokopo\" as a 2x and revealed that \"Monyet\" was a 4x. As expected from a 4x × 2x cross, the majority of the progeny was 3x (94.3%), while 2x and 4x constituted 2.58% and 3.09%, respectively. To avoid the mixture of ploidy, linkage analysis, continuous, and QTL mapping was carried out using the 138 3x F 1 hybrids whose genotypic and phenotypic data were available.The outer and inner cross-section corm damage traits were highly correlated (r = 0.88, p < 0.001), and the two traits were positively correlated with PD (r = 0.58 and r = 0.47, respectively, p < 0.001, Figure 1). The three corm damage traits (peripheral, inner, and outer cross-section damage), however, were poorly correlated with the number of recovered larvae, pupae, and weevil (0.00 < r < 0.22, Figure 1). Therefore, further 4 http://pantherdb.org Genotypes having identical letters (a, b, c) do not differ at the 5% significance level.analysis was performed on the corm damage traits only, and the inner and outer cross-section damage were represented by their average as TXD.The resistant checks, \"Yangambi Km5\" and \"Calcutta 4, \" were significantly different from the susceptible checks, \"Nakyetengu\" and \"Kabucuragye\" for both PD and TXD (p < 0.001). Regarding the two resistant checks, \"Calcutta 4\" showed a significantly higher level of resistance than \"Yangambi Km5\" for PD (Table 1). The parents were contrasting for TXD, with \"Monyet\" being significantly less resistant than \"Calcutta 4\" and \"Yangambi Km5, \" and \"Kokopo\" as susceptible as the two EAHBs. However, for PD, the two parents showed equal levels of resistance (Table 1).The two traits, PD and TXD, showed segregation in the population (Figure 2). The PD had a population mean of.25, ranging from -0.93 to 1.71 on the logit scale (Figure 2A), equivalent to 56, 28, and 85% corm damage, respectively. Despite the same level of PD for both parents, the broad-sense heritability for PD was estimated at.34, suggesting transgressive segregation in the population. The TXD in the hybrids was skewed toward the resistant phenotype as the majority of the hybrids were resistant with a population means of -2.42 or 8.16% corm damage. The score of the hybrids ranged from -6.06 to.90, equivalent to.23 and 71% corm damage, respectively (Figure 2B). The broadsense heritability for TXD was estimated at.44. Also, for TXD, transgressive segregation in the population was detected: 41 genotypes were significantly more resistant than the resistant parent \"Monyet, \" and 11 genotypes were significantly more susceptible than the susceptible parent \"Kokopo\" (Figure 2B).The DArTSeq detected 37,436 unique allelic sequences, of which 28% (10,401) were monomorphic between the two parents and 24% (9,026) were polymorphic between the two parents but not segregating (Table 2). Continuous mapping was carried out using 18,009 segregating SNPs, represented by 14,254 SNPs that segregated in \"Kokopo\" only, 3,067 SNPs that segregated in \"Monyet\" only, and 688 SNPs that segregated in both parents (Table 2). The markers were well distributed over the 11 banana chromosomes of the \"DH Pahang\" physical map [2nd version, (Martin et al., 2016)]. They ranged from 945 to 2,481 SNPs per chromosome, with the minimum number of markers detected on chromosome 10 and the maximum number on chromosome 8. Only 125 markers came from the unanchored contigs of the \"DH Pahang\" physical map (Supplementary Figure 1).Continuous mapping identified 44 SNP markers showing a significant (p < 0.001) linear regression with PD (logit_PD) and 11 SNPs showing a significant (p < 0.001) linear regression with TXD (logit_TXD, Figure 3). Forty-one (93%) of the SNPs significantly associated with PD and all 11 SNPs significantly associated with TXD were located on chromosome 6, with the SNPs associated with TXD located at two distinct regions on the two arms of the chromosome. The remaining three SNPs associated with PD were on chromosomes 5 (2 SNPs) and 8 (1 SNP, Figure 3 and Table 3). The SNPs associated with the resistance to weevils at the peripheral level segregated in the parental genotype \"Kokopo, \" except for two SNPs on chromosome 5 segregating in \"Monyet.\" Conversely, the SNP markers associated with the resistance to weevils at the corm cross-section level (logit_TXD) segregated in \"Monyet\" only (Table 3). This opposite parental segregation suggests that the two traits have different mechanisms of resistance in this population. The proportion of the phenotypic variance explained 1 Chromosome; 2 additive substitution effect for the reference allele, 3 percentage of explained variance by the SNP marker; 4 R: reference allele, A: alternative allele.by significant markers was estimated at each SNP site. For PD, it ranged from 8 to 15%, with a peak at chr06_33938938 on chromosome 6. For TXD, the explained variance ranged from 8 to 13% with a peak at chr06_880914 on chromosome 6 (Table 3). The analysis estimated the additive effect of replacing one reference allele by the alternative allele at each marker position, with the alternative allele associated with a negative effect on the traits, which translates into resistance at eight SNPs for PD and seven SNPs for TXD (Table 3).To confirm the QTL for logit_PD identified using continuous mapping on chromosome 6, we used simplex markers segregating AAAA (\"Monyet\") × RA (\"Kokopo\") to build a linkage map and map the QTL. Out of 4,619 SNPs showing an AAAA × RA parental genotype combination, 816 had less than 10%of missing data and did not show segregation distortion from the expected 1:1 segregation ratio at a significance level of α = 0.001 (χ 2 test for goodness of fit). The linkage grouping (LG) performed at threshold recombination of.20 resulted in 13 linkage groups (LGs) of at least 10 markers comprising 786 SNPs and spanning a total length of 2,343.7 cM. The number of markers per LG ranged from 10 up to 192 markers, the shortest LG being 25 cM and the longest being 521 cM in length. The LGs corresponded well with the banana chromosomes based on the chromosomal origin of the markers on \"DH Pahang\" (Martin et al., 2016), except for LG 8 containing markers from chromosomes 3 and 8 (Figure 4 and Table 4). Such a pattern suggested a translocation in \"Kokopo\" from chromosome 3 to 8, relative to the physical map of \"DH Pahang.\" However, the linkage map does not give any evidence of a reciprocal translocation from chromosome 8 to 3, although some genetic information might have been lost due to segregation distortion, given that chromosome 3 was the smallest, made of 13 markers (Table 4). Sixty percent of the AAAA × RA markers had a segregation distortion at a significance level of.05 with a distortion of 0.45 to 0.76 per chromosome (Figure 4B). Nevertheless, chromosomes 3 or 8 did not show particularly higher numbers of distorted markers which could be associated with a chromosomal dislocation, as only 45% of the markers were distorted on each of the two chromosomes at a significance level of 5% (Figure 4B). The translocation from chromosome 3 to 8 was further tested using linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis [Genstat R for Windows TM 20 th Edition (VSN International, 2019)]. LD was determined for the markers on LG 38 (Table 4) in the coupling phase. The pairwise LD and LD decay plots from this analysis indicated a seamless continuation of the markers from chromosome 8 to chromosome 3 on the same LG (Supplementary Figure 2). The interval QTL mapping followed by a composite interval QTL mapping confirmed the QTL for the PD on chromosome 6 at the significance level of.01 [-log(p) = 2, Figure 5]. The QTL had a peak at marker chr06_34317794, which was one of the SNPs identified by continuous mapping to be significantly (p < 0.001) associated with PD (Table 3). In contrast, the linkage QTL analysis did not identify any QTL for the total TXD, which can be explained by the fact that \"Monyet, \" the parent that did not segregate in the linkage map, is the parent contributing to the differences in the TXD phenotype among the segregants (Table 3).Using the physical position of the SNP significantly associated with the two traits to identify the nearest gene in the annotation file yielded 43 putative genes, with 33 of them associated with PD, 8 associated with TXD, and 1 putative gene shared between the two traits (Supplementary Table 1). Thirty-two of the SNPs were located within the gene region, seven were within less than 1 kbp, and the remaining seven were between 1 and 4.5 kbp from the gene. In terms of biological processes, the identified putative genes associated with the two traits were mostly involved in cellular and metabolic processes (Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 1). Three putative genes were identified as responsive to stimuli. These were Ma05_g24110 (LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transformation/transcription domain-associated protein-like), Ma06_g33600 (Calcium-dependent protein kinase 15), and Ma06_g38560 (Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 1), all in the vicinity of the SNPs significantly associated with PD damage.Ploidy verification is a common practice in banana research because possible discrepancies and unexpected ploidy levels have TABLE 4 | Information on the \"Kokopo\" genetic linkage map based on simplex AAAA × RA 1 markers segregating in the \"Monyet\" × \"Kokopo\" population.LG 1 numberLG 1 R: reference allele, A: alternative allele; 2 LG: linkage group; 3 corresponding chromosome based on \"DH Pahang\" physical map (Martin et al., 2016).been reported (Nsabimana and van Staden, 2006;Karamura et al., 2016). The flow cytometry analysis of \"Monyet\" has shown that it is a 2x banana, 5 though it was first reported as a 4x by Arinaitwe et al. (2019). While ploidy discrepancies arise mostly from an unreliable estimation of ploidy based on morphological features, we hypothesize that the 4x \"Monyet\" used in this study originated from a genome duplication event of a 2x \"Monyet.\" This suggestion is supported by the segregation of the markers in \"Monyet\" where nulliplex (RRRR), duplex (RRAA), and quadruplex (AAAA) loci make up 97% of the SNPs (Table 2). However, the 4x \"Monyet\" plants in the collection at IITA Sendusu reveal no morphological features of the enlarged pseudostem and drooping leaves typical for 4x bananas. As a result of the 4x of \"Monyet, \" the progeny of \"Monyet\" × \"Kokopo\" was 96% 3x, as expected from a cross between 4x and 2x bananas (Brown et al., 2017).The two EAHB used as susceptible checks (\"Nakyetengu\" and \"Kabucuragye\") in this study were equally susceptible to both PD and TXD, as expected (Kiggundu et al., 2003;Sadik et al., 2010). \"Yangambi Km5\" and \"Calcutta 4, \" the two resistant checks recommended to be used in weevil screening (Viljoen et al., 2017), have been reported as equally resistant to the pest using percentage coefficient of infestation, peripheral corm damage, and internal corm damage, scored qualitatively and quantitatively under natural and artificial infestation (Ortiz et al., 1995;Sadik et al., 2010). In this study, we found the two genotypes equally resistant for TXD, but \"Calcutta 4\" was significantly more resistant than \"Yangambi Km5\" for PD. Therefore, we strongly suggest \"Calcutta 4\" to be used as a reference when screening banana genotypes for their response to weevil infestation, especially for new hybrids developed by the banana improvement programs. While \"Monyet\" and \"Kokopo\" were equally affected for PD, they contrasted in terms of cross-section damage, with \"Monyet\" being more resistant than \"Kokopo.\" The transgressive segregation displayed in the progeny is in line with the presence of more than one loci in the repulsion phase in the two parents segregating for the traits (deVicente and Tanksley, 1993). Thus, the population segregated even for PD, although the parents did not contrast for this trait. The resistant genotypes in this study should be further investigated for their male and female fertility, agronomic characteristics, and their response to other pests and diseases common in bananas, such as nematodes, black Sigatoka, fusarium wilt, and banana bacterial wilt. In separate studies, \"Monyet\" and \"Kokopo\" have been found contrasting in terms of their response to black Sigatoka (caused by Pseudocercospora fijiensis) (Kimunye et al., 2021), banana bacterial wilt (caused by Xanthomonas vesicola pv. musacearum) (Nakato et al., 2019), and to banana fusarium wilt (caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 1) (Arinaitwe et al., 2019). The segregants from this cross should be tested for possible multiple resistance to these diseases, in addition to resistance to weevils.We have mapped the loci associated with weevil resistance in a 3x banana population derived from a cross between 4x and 2x genotypes, using DArTSeq SNP markers and an alternative QTL mapping strategy called continuous mapping. To our knowledge, our study is the first to report loci associated with weevil resistance in bananas, as the previous study that attempted to analyze the genetics for weevil resistance in bananas had solely relied on segregation analysis without the use of markers (Arinaitwe et al., 2015). The latter study suggested that corm damage was under the control of a single dominant gene in a 2x population, while our study identified at least two QTL involved in weevil resistance.Self-fertilizing 2x species have been the subject of most developments for genetic and genomic tools for decades, at the expense of non-conventional species that are polyploids or outcrossing, or both (Bourke et al., 2018b). With the advances in sequencing and genotyping, tools for polyploids have raised interest (Bourke et al., 2018b). Still, most of the tools developed for polyploids apply for even ploidy levels, especially 4x which make up the majority of the polyploid species (Comai, 2005;Ferrão et al., 2021;Garreta et al., 2021); in contrast, resources to construct linkage maps and perform QTL analyses in odd ploidy levels are limited. Bourke et al. (2018a) developed the polymapR software, which is a powerful tool for the construction of linkage maps in populations of all ploidy levels with allele dosage genotype calls, including populations from 4x × 2x crosses. However, the robustness of this tool relies on the accurate calling of the allele dosage genotypes. The population in this study was genotyped at a low sequencing depth as carried out by DArTSeq, which is often associated with genotype miscalling in polyploids. These hitches were circumvented by using the physical positions of the segregating markers instead and regressing the phenotype on the allele frequencies, called continuous mapping (Ashraf et al., 2014). So far, only a few studies have applied continuous mapping successfully in polyploid genetic and genomic analysis with sequence data of low sequencing depth to counter the effect of low-depth sequencing on genotype calling in polyploids (Sverrisdóttir et al., 2017;Zheng et al., 2020). In this study, we identified the QTL for PD and TXD by using continuous mapping. One of the QTL, segregating in the 2x parent \"Kokopo\" could be confirmed using the conventional QTL mapping method based on linkage analysis. However, the QTL linkage analysis used only a subset of the data that conformed to the conventional segregation of a BC 1 population. Continuous mapping allows the use of all the markers irrespective of the segregation type of the parents, hence encompassing the optimum genetic information of the population.One of the major drawbacks of continuous mapping is the reliance on an existing grouping and order of the markers in the form of a linkage map or a physical map. In our study, a physical map of bananas based on the \"DH Pahang\" reference genome (Martin et al., 2016) made the study possible. Also, continuous mapping results do not give information about the genetic inheritance pattern of the trait, such as the effect of dominance, epistasis, and linkage disequilibrium as a result of linkage. While continuous mapping does not take into consideration the linkage disequilibrium among the markers intrinsically, the significance of contiguous markers on the same chromosome gives confidence about the presence of a QTL at a given position. This was the case for the markers on chromosome 6. Therefore, the markers on chromosomes 5 and 8 associated with PD could be discrepant since the flanking markers are not significantly associated with the traits. We expect continuous mapping to be of great advantage in QTL mapping studies in bananas, especially for consumer-preferred quality traits in 3x banana hybrids derived from 4x by 2x crosses as developed in EAHBs and plantains.The identified loci associated with the resistance to weevil damage on chromosomes 5, 6, and 8 do not coincide with any known QTL for resistance to pests and diseases in Musa. This is mainly because marker-trait association in bananas is still in its infancy stage (Ahmad et al., 2020), although the advances in deciphering Musa genomes are promising to mend the situation. 6 Ten percent or more of corm damage translates into a bunch yield reduction of 20-45% (Rukazambuga et al., 1998). Therefore, despite the low explained variance by the identified QTL, the additive allele substitution effect at each locus as determined in this study has potential in banana breeding, especially at a polyploid level. Moreover, this knowledge on allelic effect instead of the genotype effect will facilitate the validation of the QTL in other genetic backgrounds.Weevil resistance in bananas has been hypothesized to be a result of antibiosis (deterring the weevils), antixenosis (nonpreference), and corm hardness. Antibiosis was not supported on excised plants (Night et al., 2010) and corm hardness was found uncorrelated with field resistance (Ortiz et al., 1995). Although we cannot conclude on the mechanism of resistance in this study, our results suggest that the resistance for PD differs from the one for cross-section. Despite the strong positive correlation between the two traits, segregated in \"Kokopo\" while TXD in \"Monyet.\" The two traits were associated with the markers on chromosome 6, but none the significant markers was shared among them. Although one marker associated with TXD (chr06_34681454) was in the same vicinity as the markers associated with PD (chr06_34625789 and chr06_34726334, Table 3), the three SNPs were not located within or close to the same putative genes (Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, breeding for weevil resistance in bananas should consider the two traits independently. We identified 43 putative genes co-localized with weevil resistance SNPs. The genes of interest for weevil resistance would be those associated with plant defense mechanisms. The three putative genes responsive to stimuli, Ma05_g24110 (LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transformation/transcription domain-associated protein-like), Ma06_g33600 (Calcium-dependent protein kinase 15), and Ma06_g38560 (Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 1) fall under this category. Among them, Ma06_g33600 belongs to the Calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family (CDPKs) already known to play a vital role in the plant defense against biotic and abiotic stress (Dubiella et al., 2013;Schulz et al., 2013). Likewise, Ma06_g34300, a putative wound-induced protein co-localizing with the SNP significantly associated with PD, is of interest, as it is putatively involved in wound repair, which might be useful to corm damage due to weevil larvae. This putative gene has a sequence identity closely similar to LOC4332560 identified in Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica (Kikuchi et al., 2003). The regulation of these genes should be further investigated in known resistant vs. susceptible banana genotypes to determine their potential functionality concerning the response of bananas to C. sordidus.Chromosomal translocations are common in bananas and have played an important role in the evolution and speciation of the Musa genome (Martin et al., 2017(Martin et al., , 2020a;;Šimoníková et al., 2020). Chromosome 8 has been reported in many translocation events in various M. acuminata spp. (Dupouy et al., 2019). The linkage analysis of the simplex AAAA × RA markers segregating in \"Kokopo\" suggested a translocation from chromosome 3 to chromosome 8, relative to the \"DH Pahang\" physical map. The translocation was identified through the construction of a \"Kokopo\" linkage map and confirmed by LD analysis. Such a translocation has been reported in M. acuminata spp. zebrina and M. acuminata ssp. burmannica (Šimoníková et al., 2020), but not in M. acuminata spp. banksii. Unlike the abovementioned studies, our data did not give evidence of a reciprocal translocation from chromosome 8 to chromosome 3. This finding suggests that more translocations are yet to be discovered in Musa. The segregation distortion of the AAAA × RA markers was pronounced with 60% of the genome-wide markers distorted at a significance level of.05. However, there was no indication of a particular higher segregation distortion for the markers on chromosomes 3 or 8 as compared with the rest of the chromosomes, which would be associated with the translocation."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/3998048753.json b/main/part_2/3998048753.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e839fa9685a3327e8c74ea739e29ddaefcec4c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/3998048753.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0dd7629ebbe04313c256ec35bb0a41d6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/248b979c-97fe-404c-b9bb-37e23c541f85/retrieve","id":"-1447839966"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5891d777-8d3f-445e-8359-65572dd65b92","content":"• After the National Seed Industry Agency (NSIA) mandate was transferred to MoARD and there came a need to revise and incorporate certain procedures related to the evaluation, release and registration of candidate varieties as well as imported varieties.• The main committee working on revision of the national variety release procedure and mechanism have recognised the need for including Pasture and forage crops in the release procedure and suggested to have technical team to work details. • Hence, the technical team was drawn from relevant institutions: the then Input Authority, the then EARO now EIAR, Regional research institutes and MoARD working in the areas of Pasture and forage research and development.• In Ethiopia agricultural research and higher learning institutions and to a limited extent private organizations are engaged in development of varieties that increases quality and productivity per unit area.• Some countries have a rigorous testing system and variety releasing mechanisms before the newly developed variety is made available to farmers.• Other countries have no such mechanism and the varieties developed could be distributed to farmers by the researchers.• The rigorous testing system is most widely used. It is more reliable, safe and suitable to an agrarian country like Ethiopia.• Although there was a dire interest in developing and releasing Pasture and forage crop variety since the mid 1660's, the 1st comprehensive work in this regard dates back to the mid 1990's (Review work in ESAP, 1996).• Since then, concern by researchers, development practitioners and policy makers were raised in different fora and concerted efforts from various directions have led to the current initiative.• Review and evaluate the report of technical committee and decide on the fate of the varieties. • Determine the uniqueness and production potential of the candidate varieties • Ensure that the newly released varieties meet current requirements for resistance to economically important diseases, parasitic weeds and insect pests.• Undertake decision by consensus• The Standing Committee shall contain the following professionals:• Technical committees will be formed for evaluation of variety verification trials (VVT) and applicant documents for the release decision of the national variety release committee.• The committee could be composed of five qualified and experienced core professionals covering different disciplines: • Verify/validate the data submitted by the breeder with the actual field experiment.• Carry out field evaluation on the performance of the candidate varieties based on the evaluation criteria. and check the candidate varieties for distinctiveness, uniformity and stability (DUS) test based on criteria • Prepare reports on the objective observation and proper scrutiny of the evaluation with active participation of all members. • Submit evaluation reports to the secretariat at most a month after the evaluation of the candidate variety/harvest of the crop.The evaluation report from the technical committee is expected to cover• Performance data evaluation: This will consist of scrutinizing the submitted data for completeness and relevance. Commissions and assessing if appropriate comparisons were done. • Variety designation, pedigree, reaction to pests, other stresses.• Field performance evaluation: Performance evaluation and recording of relevant information could be useful in decision making and checking against reported information. • General comments: Any general observation regarding the verification plots and shortcomings and suggestion should be included. • Recommendation: A recommendation on whether to accept, reject or release the variety proposed for release should be explicitly stated. • For annuals: On-farm• For perennials-On-station data could be used• The new variety must show excellent performance in sufficient number of tests in comparison with the standard cultivar (s) grown in the ecological zone (s) where to be used. When a candidate variety is proposed for release for its yield advantage, it should be significantly superior over the standard check.• The variety to be released should be uniform, stable and distinctly superior to the existing commercial cultivar(s) grown in the area in one or more characteristics important for the crop and is satisfactory in other major requirements. • However, when there is no adequate number of released cultivars of a particular crop, the NVRC may consider releasing a variety even if it is not superior to existing local cultivar, without compromising the requirements of the grower.• A variety which has got a special merit on a specified limiting factor on the existing commercial cultivars (e.g. drought, excess moisture, frost, pest etc) will be considered for release on one year trial data with additional data from the second-year trial to be conducted in the same year with the verification.• The variety should be tested for herbage/biomass yield on DM basis, quality, palatability, disease and insect reactions and other important characteristics for a minimum of two years in R/NVT trials.• For wide adaptation, the variety must be tested at least in 3 to 4 locations in different AEZ where the variety is to be recommended.• However, if the variety is intended for specific release the test in 2 to 3 locations in the same agro-ecology.• For national release (Wider adaptation) -At least two major agroecologies and 2-3 sites within the agro-ecologies need to be considered-one would be on-station and two on farms. • However, for specific adaptation (regional release) at least two sub agro-ecologies or production belts and three sites within the sub agroecologies need to be considered (one would be on-station). • The quality of the variety (CP, NDF, bioassays and leaf to stem ratio) should be indicated.• For herbaceous and tree legumes aspects of rumen degradability need to be incorporated at national variety trial stage since total nitrogen will not indicate the quality of the variety. • Under situations where resources are limited, laboratory data on quality of the variety must be provided based on analysis of pooled samples across locations. • The new variety should be planted along with the established improved cultivar as the case may be in relatively large plots (10x10 m) at 3 to 5 sites (one on station and two on farm) on each agro-ecological zone verification trials during the anticipated year of release for assessment by TC.o The verification sites (the on station and on farm) should be at least within a minimum range of ten-kilometer radius.o For annuals: ✓should be included at a N/RVT stage for the best 2 to 3 candidates using pilot animals (sheep or goat). ✓on-farm for one season at two sites. o For perennials-animal response data will be taken at on-station verification stage.o Due consideration should be given to represent farmers practices and standard cultivar for comparison purposes in animal response trials using standard procedures.o The standard known cultivar and candidate variety need to be compared using five animals per treatment for duration of 90 days. • Biological data i.e. quantity and quality of feed, quantity and quality of animal product, data related to animal condition and body weight shall be taken.• Socio-economic data would also be taken to complement biological performance data in the verification process. Supporting Documents• Appropriate data to support recommendations as stipulated in conditions for release, disease reaction and other supporting data for individual locations and years should be presented in addition to the summaries. • Recommendation on mode of utilization (cut and carry, grazing, hay, silage), target animal, agro ecology / farming system, mode of offer etc should be included.• Other relevant data on pooled samples across locations on important characteristics of quality. • In vitro digestibility etc. in a regional or national variety trial should be supplied, (palatability/intake, animal responses (growth or body weight gain) should also be included. • Three completed copies of the variety release request form and data of all the testing period of the variety in all tested locations and a year x location data summary of the recommended entries must be submitted to the committee chairman before May 30 each year.• The office appoints a Technical Committee (T.C.) that includes relevant specialists to report on varietal performance after examining the submitted data and evaluating verification plots. • In any one season no more than two varieties per crop should be proposed for release under the same agro-ecological zone in the coming years unless sufficient written justification is given for such action. • Moreover, a variety once rejected by the TC should not be repeatedly put in verification and proposed for release in the coming years unless sufficient written justification is given for such action. • Action to place a variety on the release list will be taken at the January/February and March/April meeting of the NVRC. • The breeder submitting a variety for release will be called to appear in person before the NVRC to answer enquiries regarding the proposal. • Decisions reached by the committee will be published or reported at the National Agricultural Research and Development Forum annually.• Provisionally released variety should be planted in the following year on a o quarter of hectare for grass and o one hectare plot for legumes at two appropriate sites (research station and on farms) for final inspection by the NVRC. • If not planted within the coming two years, it will lose its provisional status but could be considered as a new entry in another variety trial. • A new variety should be assigned a permanent designation by the breeder/team (preferably a short local name) if the variety is approved for release. o This is a pre-condition for release and registration. o The proposed name can be rejected by the NVRC for valid reason. o A variety should not be distributed under more than one name.• A variety recommended for repeat, if not tested within the coming two years o will loose its repeat status but could be considered as a new entry in another variety trial. • The breeder or institution responsible for developing the variety that has been approved for release would be expected to maintain an appropriate quantity of the breeder and basic seed for use in replenishing and restoring commercial seed of a variety to the desired genetic purity and supply to producers through the agency. • An obsolete variety arising from genetic deterioration, loss of resistance to diseases, or a breakdown in resistance/tolerance to a condition the candidate cultivar was developed for will be o communicated to the EAA by the users (breeders, extension agent, state farms) for the appropriate action. • The quantity of the nucleus seed that the breeder should preferably keep in cold storage is shown in columns of the same tables.• The breeder is responsible to ensure that this nucleus stock is 100% authentic (represent the variety as released) and viability exceeding 85%.• In practice, the breeder will multiply this seed one generation to obtain seed quantity for authorized government and other users and simultaneously replace his nucleus stock in cold storage.• Obsolete variety: A variety that has been in use for long time and has become less productive due to genetic deterioration, loss of resistance to diseases, or a breakdown in resistance/tolerance to a condition the candidate cultivar was developed for, poorly demanded in the market.o will be communicated to the office.• The NVRC identify technical team for final decision. • Registered commercial cultivars to be imported from similar agro-ecology from abroad need to pass through quarantine & tested for adaptation for o 1 yr at 5 sites for annuals & for o 2 yrs at 5 sites for perennials. • Based on the recommendation domain of the cultivar the following sites (Table 3) need to be considered. • Data to be collected are similar to multi-location variety testing.• Promising materials of wider or specific adaptation shall be identified & promoted to variety verification stage. Thank you!"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4000333530.json b/main/part_2/4000333530.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96ac57a83e17fbbb42594f16d976ef10039ce8b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4000333530.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"126e9d0598903cfc00ad78ad1fea284f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/a773811e-99ed-4069-b913-794e7ae3d408/content","id":"-803806710"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3c045589-03f6-4f15-a467-aa203759fdf8","content":"The Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture takes stock of the costs, benefits and impacts of the past 50 years of water development for agriculture, the water management challenges communities are facing today, and solutions people have developed. The results of the Assessment will enable farming communities, governments and donors to make better-quality investment and management decisions to meet food and environmental security objectives in the near future and over the next 25 years.The Research Report Series captures results of collaborative research conducted under the Assessment. It also includes reports contributed by individual scientists and organizations that significantly advance knowledge on key Assessment questions. Each report undergoes a rigorous peer-review process. The research presented in the series feeds into the Assessment's primary output-a \"State of the World\" report and set of options backed by hundreds of leading water and development professionals and water users.Reports in this series may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgement. Electronic copies of reports can be downloaded from the Assessment website (www.iwmi.org/assessment).If you are interested in submitting a report for inclusion in the series, please see the submission guidelines available on the Assessment website or send a written request to: Sepali Goonaratne,The recent stagnation of productivity growth in the irrigated areas of the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia has led to a quest for resourceconserving technologies that can save water, reduce production costs and improve production.The present synthesis of two detailed country studies confirmed widespread adoption of zero tillage (ZT) wheat in the rice-wheat systems of India's Haryana State (34.5% of surveyed households) and Pakistan's Punjab province (19%). The combination of a significant \"yield effect\" and \"cost-saving effect\" makes adoption worthwhile and is the main driver behind the rapid spread and widespread acceptance of ZT in Haryana, India. In Punjab, Pakistan, adoption is driven by the significant ZT-induced cost savings for wheat cultivation. Thus, the prime driver for ZT adoption is not water savings or natural resource conservation but monetary gain in both sites.Water savings are only a potential added benefit. ZT adoption for wheat has accelerated from insignificant levels from 2000 onwards in both sites. Geographic penetration of ZT is far from uniform, suggesting the potential for further diffusion, particularly in Haryana, India. Diffusion seems to have stagnated in the Punjab study area, and further follow-up studies are needed to confirm this. The study also revealed significant dis-adoption of ZT in the survey year: Punjab, Pakistan 14 percent and Haryana, India 10 percent. Better understanding the rationale for dis-adoption merits further scrutiny. Our findings suggest that there is no clear single overarching constraint but that a combination of factors is at play, including technology performance, technology access, seasonal constraints and, particularly in the case of Punjab, Pakistan, the institutional ZT controversy. In terms of technology performance, the relative ZT yield was particularly influential: dis-adopters of ZT reporting low ZT yields as a major contributor to farmer disillusionment in Punjab, Pakistan and the lack of a significant yield effect in Haryana, India. In neither site did the ZT-induced time savings in land preparation translate into timelier establishment, contributing to the general lack of a yield increase. Knowledge blockages, resource constraints and ZT drill cost and availability all contributed to nonadoption. This suggests that there is potential to further enhance access to this technology and thereby its penetration.The study highlights that in both Haryana, India and Punjab, Pakistan ZT has been primarily adopted by the larger and more productive farmers. The structural differences between the adopters and non-adopters/dis-adopters in terms of resource base, crop management and performance thereby easily confound the assessment of ZT impact across adoption categories. This calls for the comparison of the ZT plots and conventional tillage plots on adopter farms.ZT-induced effects primarily apply to the establishment and production costs of the wheat crop. Both the Haryana, India and Punjab, Pakistan studies confirmed significant ZT-induced resource-saving effects in farmers' fields in terms of diesel and tractor time for wheat cultivation. Water savings are, however, less pronounced than expected from on-farm trial data. It was only in Haryana, India that there were significant ZTinduced water savings in addition to significant yield enhancement. The higher yield and water savings in Haryana, India result in significantly Introduction 1In South Asia, rice-wheat cropping systems cover 13.5 million hectares (mha) and provide incomes and food to many millions of people (Gupta et al. 2003;Timsina and Connor 2001). The rice-wheat system is primarily irrigated, with 85 percent concentrated in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) (Timsina and Connor 2001). In the face of increasing competition for water from industrial, domestic and environmental sectors, concerns are being raised about the productivity of water used in agriculture (Kijne et al. 2003). Increasing water scarcity is also seen as a major contributor to stagnating productivity in the rice-wheat cropping systems of the IGP (Byerlee et al. 2003;Kumar et al. 2002). Due to the absence of efficient water-pricing mechanisms, the scarcity value of water is not reflected in water prices (Pingali and Shah 2001). In the face of unreliable canal water supplies, many farmers have increased their reliance on private tube wells, placing tremendous pressure on groundwater supplies (Abrol 1999;Ahmad et al. 2007;Qureshi et al. 2003). Negative environmental effects related to irrigation are increasing as overexploitation of groundwater and poor water management lead to the dropping of water tables in some areas and increased waterlogging and salinity in others (Harrington et al. 1993;Pingali and Shah 2001;Qureshi et al. 2003). In addition, tube-well irrigation has raised production costs in view of the energy expenses incurred (electricity or diesel) (Qureshi et al. 2003). Agricultural technologies that can save water, reduce production costs and improve production are therefore becoming increasingly important (Gupta et al. 2002;Hobbs and Gupta 2003b).The Rice-Wheat Consortium (RWC) for the IGP (www.rwc.cgiar.org), which is made up of international agricultural research centers, national agricultural research organizations from Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan, and advanced research institutes has developed and promoted a number of technologies that increase farm-level productivity, conserve natural resources and limit negative environmental impacts (Gupta and Sayre 2007;Gupta and Seth 2007;Hobbs and Gupta 2003a). These resource-conserving technologies (RCTs) form the basis for conservation agriculture. \"Conservation agriculture\" is the term used for a diverse array of crop management practices that involve minimal disturbance of the soil, retention of residue mulch on the soil surface and use of crop rotations (FAO 2007;Harrington and Erenstein 2005;Hobbs 2007).Since the mid-1980s, researchers, farmers, extension specialists, machinery importers and local machinery manufacturers have been working to adapt RCTs to South Asia's rice-wheat cropping systems (Ekboir 2002;Seth et al. 2003).The RCTs have been actively promoted in the IGP for about 10 years and recent evidence suggests that these efforts are beginning to bear fruit. Data collected from benchmark and farmer fields show that RCTs provide a wide array of benefits, including higher yields, lower production costs, improved water and fertilizer use efficiency, better control of pests and diseases and reduced greenhouse gas emissions (see Anwar et al. 2002;Hobbs and Gupta 2003a;Khan et al. 2002;Malik et al. 2002aMalik et al. , 2005a)).To date, the RCT that has been most successful in the IGP is zero-tillage (ZT) planting of wheat after rice (Laxmi et al. 2007). ZT in rice-wheat systems ranges from surface seeding to planting with seed drills drawn by four-wheel tractors (Hobbs et al. 1997). In surface seeding, wheat seeds are broadcast on a saturated soil surface before or after rice harvest (Tripathi et al. 2006). It is a simple technology for resource-poor farmers requiring no land preparation and no machinery, but its use is still largely confined to low-lying fields that remain too moist for tractors to enter, particularly in the eastern IGP. Mechanized ZT has proven more popular in the IGP, but implies the need for a tractor-drawn ZT seed drill. This specialized seeding implement allows wheat seed to be planted directly into unplowed fields with a single pass of the tractor, often with simultaneous basal fertilizer application (Mehla et al. 2000). In contrast, conventional tillage (CT) practices for wheat involve multiple passes of the tractor to accomplish plowing, harrowing, planking and seeding operations. The use of ZT significantly reduces energy costs, mainly by reducing tractor costs associated with CT methods, and also because water savings reduce the time that tube wells must be operated. The use of ZT also allows the wheat crop to be planted sooner than would be possible using CT methods, which significantly reduces turnaround time. This is an important consideration in many parts of the rice-wheat belt, where late planting of wheat is a major cause of reduced yields: terminal heat implies that wheat yield potential reduces by 1-1.5 percent per day if planting occurs after 20th November (Ortiz-Monasterio et al. 1994;Hobbs and Gupta 2003a).Of particular interest here is the impact of ZT on water use efficiency. Experimental evidence has shown that ZT reduces irrigation requirements in wheat compared to CT (Gupta et al. 2002;Hobbs and Gupta 2003b). ZT uses residual soil water more effectively. With ZT irrigation, water spreads faster across the surface, whereby irrigation can be stopped once the field is covered. ZT potentially improves the soil structure and facilitates the buildup of crop residue, which have been linked to increased water retention, better infiltration and reduced overall water use. In addition, the faster turnaround time made possible by ZT allows the wheat crop to be planted and harvested earlier, potentially reducing the need for one or more late-season irrigations in some areas. At the time this study was initiated, these benefits had yet to be conclusively documented in farmers' self-adopted fields, although now some such studies are available (Ahmad et al. 2007;Chandra et al. 2007;Jehangir et al. 2007;Malik et al. 2005b).A prerequisite for any ex-post adoption and impact study is that the technology of interest must have moved beyond the research station and into farmers' fields. While a number of resource-conserving technologies were being developed and tested in the northwest IGP at the time of initiating this study (PARC-RWC 2003;RWC 2002), most had yet to be widely promoted, and uptake by farmers was minimal, although more recently technologies like laser leveling and bed planting have also shown promise (Connor et al. 2003;Jat et al. 2006). For this reason, the current study focuses on ZT wheat, which is known to have spread into farmers' fields.The extent to which ZT has diffused across the IGP is also not known exactly. Field observations and knowledgeable experts estimate that the area under ZT is significant and is rapidly increasing, particularly in India (Laxmi et al. 2007). Area estimates are often based on the sales of ZT drills and average area coverage per drill (e.g., Malik et al. 2005b, 6-7). There was thus a need to verify the extent of adoption and its impact through structured empirical surveys. Without such data, the technical and economic benefits actually realized by farmers also remain unknown, since scaling up from plot-level experimental data to arrive at aggregate measures of impact is problematic and misses eventual adaptations of farmers in terms of finetuning and modifying the technology to their circumstances.To promote faster and extensive adoption of RCTs in general and ZT in particular, a better understanding is needed not only of their impacts at various levels of aggregation (field, farm and region), but also of the factors that influence the adoption and diffusion. Research has indicated the potential technological benefits, but experience suggests that successful adoption depends on a favorable confluence of technical, economic, institutional and policy factors (CIMMYT 1993;Feder et al. 1985). It is only by understanding these factors that researchers, extension specialists, machinery manufacturers and policymakers will be able to modify the technology, delivery mechanisms and policy environment to stimulate successful adoption and diffusion.The overall objective of the present study is to enhance our understanding of the adoption and impacts of ZT as a resource-conserving technology in farmers' rice-wheat fields in the This report synthesizes the findings of the two detailed country studies (Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007) and is organized into eight chapters. In the second chapter we review the methodology. In the third we document the diffusion of the technology. In the fourth we analyze the factors affecting ZT adoption. In the fifth we analyze and evaluate the technical plotlevel impact of the technology and in the sixth the financial plot-level impacts. In the seventh chapter we analyze the farm and regional impacts. In the eighth and final chapter we give the conclusions and recommendations.The study focuses on two irrigated rice-wheat areas in the northwest IGP (figure 1). The first is the rice-wheat zone in Haryana, located in the northwest of India and falling in the Trans-Gangetic Plains. The second is the rice-wheat zone in Punjab, located in the northeast of Pakistan close to the Indian border and falling within the Indus Plains. In the Haryana study area the average annual precipitation ranges from 300 mm yr -1 (Sirsa district) to 1,100 mm yr -1(Yamunanagar district) (Central Ground Water Board 2007). In the Punjab study area the average annual precipitation ranges from 400 mm yr -1 (Sheikhupura district) to 800 mm yr -1 (Sialkot district) (Byerlee et al. 1984). The semiarid climate is continental monsoonal, with some 80 percent of the total precipitation during the monsoonal season from June to September. Wheat is grown in the cold and dry weather from November to March, whereas rice is grown during the warm humid/semi-humid season from June to October (Timsina and Connor 2001). With an annual potential evapotranspiration of at least 1,400 mm (Harrington et al. 1993;Jehangir et al. 2007), rice and wheat are dependent on irrigation, which includes the conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater. Both study areas are served by a developed canal irrigation system, although groundwater now provides the major share of total water supply at the farm gate (Harrington et al. 1993;Jehangir et al. 2007) making up for the inadequate volume, frequency and timing of canal water (Ahmad et al. 2007).The soils in the study areas are predominantly alluvial, calcareous, very low in organic carbon and weakly structured, with light to medium texture (sandy loam to clay loam) (Harrington et al. 1993;Jehangir et al. 2007). Survey locations.The rice-wheat systems in the study areas are highly mechanized, input-intensive, commercial and with relatively large farm holdings, particularly when compared to the eastern IGP (Erenstein et al. 2007b;Gupta et al. 2003). Another distinguishing feature of both study areas within the IGP is the popularity of basmati rice (Timsina and Connor 2001), an aromatic fine-quality rice which takes a longer time to mature. Wheat has traditionally been, and continues to be, the mainstay of food security in the northwest IGP, and the introduction and widespread cultivation of rice have only occurred in recent decades (Erenstein et al. 2007d). The introduction of rice has, thereby, put increasing pressure on the ability to plant wheat timely without incurring yield losses. The delay in planting the wheat crop is mainly due to the late harvest of the previous crop and/or a long turnaround time. The late harvest of the previous rice crop can be linked to both the late rice establishment and the duration of the rice crop, particularly basmati. The long turnaround time often reflects intensive tillage operations, soilmoisture problems (too wet or too dry), nonavailability of traction power for plowing, and the urgency to store the rice crop before preparing land for wheat cultivation. Farmers perceive the need for intensive tillage due to the difference in soil management practices for rice and wheat -the former being grown under anaerobic conditions and the latter under aerobic conditions (Laxmi et al. 2007).This study interprets ZT as the planting of wheat with a tractor-drawn ZT seed drill directly into unplowed fields with a single pass of the tractor. Although prototype ZT seed drills were first introduced into South Asia during the mid-to late 1980s, significant adoption of ZT by farmers began only in the late 1990s. The two study areas in Haryana and Punjab were purposively chosen for this study as they comprise the locations where ZT promotion was initiated and adoption was most significant (Khan et al. 2002;Malik et al. 2005c). Each study draws from two similar primary data sources: the survey of ZT drill manufacturers and a formal adoption survey of rice-wheat farmers. The Punjab study was complemented with a village survey (Farooq et al. 2007) and the Haryana study with a water-use survey of rice-wheat farmers (Erenstein et al. 2007a).This study focuses on ZT through the use of the tractor-drawn ZT seed drill, i.e., ZT as a crop management technology that is embodied in unique agricultural machinery. As a result, it is possible to assess the advent of the technology through a supply-side analysis. For this purpose, a survey of ZT drill manufacturers was implemented in December 2003 (Anwar et al. 2004;Parwez et al. 2004). Altogether 35 ZT manufacturers were identified in Haryana and 43 in Punjab, of whom about two-thirds were directly interviewed for this study (table 1).The main primary data source for this study was a formal survey of rice-wheat growers from the rice-wheat zones of Haryana and Punjab. The adoption survey used a stratified sampling frame. Within each country study, the districts (and subdistricts) with predominantly rice-wheat systems were purposively chosen (figure 2), comprising at least four (sub)districts where ZT has been widely promoted and at least two where promotion of ZT has been less extensive. The two country studies varied somewhat in the exact sampling approach (for details see Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007). In the case of Haryana, altogether five villages per district were randomly chosen from 10 districts. Within each selected village, eight farm households were chosen randomly. This gave a total of 50 villages and 400 farm households. In the case of Punjab, 51 villages were selected comprising 24 ZTpromoted and 27 non-promoted villages. From each selected village typically some 8-10 farmers were interviewed giving a total of 458 farmers (table 1).Each selected household was visited twice during 2003-04 to collect detailed information using a structured questionnaire covering various Where farmers had used both ZT and CT for their wheat crop, both plots were surveyed giving a total of 499 wheat plots from 400 farm households in Haryana and 522 wheat plots from 458 farm households in Punjab. Similarly, depending on the preceding wheat crop, 468 and 528 rice plots (from Haryana and Punjab, respectively), were surveyed (table 1). To put the rabi 2003-04 season in perspective, the study also traced the adoption history of each farmer. Specifically in the case of Punjab, the surveyed villages were also revisited in the subsequent year to ascertain the extent of ZT area in rabi 2004-05 and related indicators.For the subsequent analysis and reporting, farm households were classified based on their use of ZT in wheat. The farmers who used ZT for wheat Those who never used ZT for wheat on their farm were classified as non-adopters. Finally, those farmers who had used ZT in the past, but not in rabi 2003-04, were classified as dis-adopters. We hypothesize that there are a number of differences between the three types of adopters, and that these may help explain the observed adoption decision. The adopters, non-adopters and dis-adopters were found to have inherently different crop management practices, irrespective of the use of ZT. This primarily appears to be a reflection of their inherently different asset bases. The plot-level comparisons in this synthesis will therefore focus on the comparison of the ZT and CT plots of adopters only (for details for all plots see detailed country studies - Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007). This comparison is more objective in view of the underlying resource base and management differentials. This may underestimate the impact of ZT in the event that adopters reduced the intensity of their \"conventional\" crop management practices after having used ZT. However, compared to the other adoption categories (see Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007) and previously reported tillage intensities (Byerlee et al. 1984;Harrington et al. 1993), no reduction of tillage intensity in the CT plots of adopters was apparent; so according to the survey data this bias is relatively minor.The significance of all bivariate contrasts between adopter categories and plot types was calculated using the relevant statistical tests (e.g., ANOVA with post-hoc test; t-test). The factors affecting the farm-level decision to adopt ZT were analyzed using the logit regression model, a standard limited-dependent variable approach (CIMMYT 1993). The dependent variable is dichotomous, and takes the value of one when ZT is used and zero if it is not. The independent variables included in the adoption models covered a range of relatively fixed and exogenous characteristics of farm households that were expected to be associated with the ZT adoption decision. Not all variables originally hypothesized could be included in the final models: some variables proved to be highly correlated (e.g., tractor ownership and farm size), and some were not unambiguously measured or proved nondiscriminating. For consistency reasons, we retained the same explanatory variables in the two country studies. The descriptive statistics of the independent variables included in the models and further details are given in the respective country case studies (Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007).The water productivity analysis follows the water productivity framework developed by Molden and associates (Molden 1997;Molden et al. 1998;Seckler 1996), which is increasingly being applied (Ahmad et al. 2004;Cabangon et al. 2002;Jehangir et al. 2007). The main inflow components of the study area and considered in this study are irrigation from the canal and tubewell sources and rainfall. Water productivity was estimated on the basis of the yield and monetary value per unit of the gross inflow (irrigation + rain) and irrigation inflow.The water inflow indicators draw from farmer recall plot-level data for number and duration of irrigations by source (canal and tube well). These were converted into water volumes using average irrigation volumetric rates and seasonal rainfall in the study area. For the Haryana study area we used the average irrigation rates from the water survey conducted within the context of this study (Erenstein et al. 2007a: 52.5 The financial analysis was done per individual surveyed household using the reported physical input/output levels and local farm prices that prevailed at the time of the survey. Prices are reported financial market prices, including eventual taxes and subsidies. These market rates are assumed to be a reliable reflection of opportunity costs, irrespective of ownership (e.g., in case of land and tractors) and facilitate comparison. Missing values have been substituted with the corresponding average for the locality. Local currency was converted to US dollars at the average conversion rate at the time.The gross revenue from crop cultivation comprises the value of all the grain and the value of the residues/straw. The total production cost includes:1. Land preparation (all tillage plus eventual post-sowing pass to cover seed).2. Crop establishment (cost of seeding operation only, includes seed, labor and machinery).3. Fertilizer cost (includes chemical fertilizer and farm yard manure).4. Plant protection cost (includes herbicides, manual weeding, pesticides/fungicides).5. Irrigation cost (flat area-based rate for canal and variable time-based cost for tube well).6. Harvesting expenditures (includes labor and machinery for harvesting and threshing).7. Land rent (prevailing seasonal rent).As performance indicators are included:• Net revenue = (gross revenue) -(total production cost)• Percentage of plots with positive net revenue• Benefit:cost (ratio) = (gross revenue) / (total production cost)In India, rapid and widespread adoption of ZT started in Haryana (Laxmi et al. 2007;Malik et al. 2005c). The emphasis on ZT development originated from diagnostic studies that highlighted the importance of time conflicts between rice harvesting and wheat planting in the area (Fujisaka et al. 1994;Harrington et al. 1993). ZT was thereby perceived to be a viable option to alleviate the problem of late planting of wheat after rice, the combined result of late maturing rice and long turnaround time. By reducing soil movement, ZT also serves as an effective control measure of Phalaris minor, a major weed, which reduced wheat yields in the IGP and which showed emerging resistance to isoproturon herbicide after repeated and widespread use in the mid-1990s (Malik et al. 2002b;Yadav and Malik 2005). The ability to control herbicide-resistant phalaris thereby became a major initial driver for adoption of ZT in northwest India, which in combination with new herbicides eventually managed to control the phalaris problem. Experts estimated the zero/reduced tillage (ZT/RT) area in Haryana to be 350,000 hectares in 2003-04 (Laxmi et al. 2007;RWC 2004).In Pakistan, promotion and adoption of ZT started in Punjab (Aslam et al. 1993;Iqbal et al. 2002;Khan et al. 2002;Sheikh et al. 1993). The emphasis on ZT development again originated from diagnostic studies that highlighted the importance of time conflicts between rice harvesting and wheat planting in • Production cost = (total production cost) / (grain yield) Further details are given in the respective country case studies (Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007).the area (Amir and Aslam 1992;Byerlee et al. 1984;Sharif et al. 1992). Favorable experimental findings led to a ZT pilot production program in the 1990s to expand the use of this technology in the rice-wheat zone of Punjab (Aslam et al. 1993). ZT was subsequently picked up by farmers with an estimated 0.2 mha planted with ZT drill during 2001-02 (Mann and Meisner 2003) while, according to unpublished data from the On-Farm Water Management, an estimated 0.3 mha had been planted in 2003-04 (RWC 2004).In both India and Pakistan, promotion and adoption of ZT emphasized the use of a tractordrawn ZT seed drill. This drill typically opens a number (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) of narrow slits with inverted-T tines for placement of seed (and sometimes fertilizer) at a depth of 7.5-10 cm into the soil. This specialized agricultural machinery was originally not available in South Asia. A key component in the technology diffusion was creating the local manufacturing capacity to supply adequate and affordable ZT drills. In both study areas, ZT manufacturing capacity is geographically concentrated in the rice-wheat belt (northwest of Haryana and northeast of Punjab). In Pakistan, this corresponds to the traditional farmmachinery-making centers for cultivators and threshers like Daska town in the Sialkot district, Punjab. In India, the first commercial ZT drills also originated from the traditional machinerymanufacturing centers like Ludhiana and Amritsar in Indian Punjab. It was only later that manufacturers in Haryana joined this business.The two country studies compiled ZT drill sales figures in Haryana and Punjab and the comparison is revealing. The two States show a largely similar increase in the number of manufacturers over time, both in absolute and relative terms (figure 3 2003-04 (figure 4). The studies thus empirically confirm the significant levels of adoption of ZT wheat in the rice-wheat systems of the northwest IGP, underscoring the appeal of the technology among farmers. The surveyed farmers were questioned when they first used ZT and their use of ZT since then. The plotted responses (figure 5) distinguish between ZT adoption (i.e., those who actually used ZT in the corresponding year, dash) and ZT penetration (i.e., those who (b) had used ZT by that year, adopters and disadopters combined, line). In the case of Haryana, the ZTD diffusion in many ways follows the traditional diffusion pattern of technological innovations. After nearly a decade of adaptive research, demonstration and slow initial diffusion, diffusion started to pick up rapidly from 2000 onwards. The data suggest that ZT adoption levels for wheat may end up somewhat higher than the observed one-third of the surveyed rice-wheat farmers at the time of the survey (figure 5a). In the case of Punjab, up to 2002-03, ZT diffusion in many ways seemed to follow the traditional diffusion pattern of technological innovations similar to that of Haryana. Diffusion started to pick up rapidly from 2000, but adoption rates seem to have abruptly peaked in 2002-03 (at 24%, figure 5b). A separate study in Punjab also reports a considerable increase in the adoption of ZT between 2000 and 2003, although without showing signs of peaking (Ahmad et al. 2007). Annual aggregate ZT area share over sample farms (%)Haryana Punjab (a)Our random stratified sample of rice-wheat farmers also revealed 10 percent and 14 percent to be ZT dis-adopters in Haryana and Punjab, respectively (table 2). Dis-adopters are defined here as farmers who had used ZT in preceding seasons, but did not do so in the 2003-04 rabi season for whatever reason. It is noteworthy that the dis-adoption rates are lower in Haryana, both in absolute terms (share of surveyed households) and in relative terms (share of households that have tried ZT). Most disadoption is of recent nature in both sites, and was particularly pronounced in the 2003-04 season (figure 5).4 The village-level data for the subsequent rabi season (2004-05) in the Punjab study area suggested further dis-adoption (Farooq et al. 2007). The subsequent years will thus inform us whether ZT adoption levels for wheat in Punjab may end up significantly lower or higher than at the time of the survey.Dis-adoption is both permanent and temporary, whereas 74 percent and 54 percent of those who have used ZT in Haryana and Punjab, respectively, have done so continuously. Temporary dis-adoption could be associated with the untimely availability of the ZT drill or unfavorable seasonal conditions for ZT in the survey year 2003-04. For instance, untimely rain prior to rice harvesting may cause combiners to cause ruts in the fields that need to be evened out through tillage. Alternatively, untimely rain can cause a flush of weeds that a farmer prefers to control through reduced tillage. However, in the survey year, rainfall during the critical months of October and November suggests a relatively normal aggregate rainfall for Punjab, albeit somewhat late, whereas Haryana was relatively dry.5 Prolonged or even permanent disadoption could be associated with a farmer structurally losing access to a functional ZT drill or being disillusioned with ZT for whatever reason. For 4In Figure 5, dis-adoption is shown as the difference between the dashed and continuous lines.5 For the Pakistan study area, October-November rainfall in nearby Lahore was 16 mm in 2003 (0 mm in October and 16 mm in November) as against a 30-year average of 16.6 mm (12.4 mm in October and 4.2 mm in November; Lahore meteorological station, unpublished data). For the India study area, October-November rainfall in Kurukshetra was only 1 mm in 2003 (0 mm in October and 1 mm in November) as against a 1989-2005 average of 21 mm (18 mm in October and 3 mm in November; Office of the Deputy Director, Agriculture, Kurukshetra, unpublished data). instance, particularly dis-adopters and the Punjab study reported the lack of yield enhancement with ZT as an issue (see subsequent chapters). It is also noteworthy that in both study areas disadopters had typically used ZT for one single year, suggesting an unsuccessful first experience and/or limited perseverance.The slower diffusion and higher dis-adoption in Punjab are likely associated with the ongoing institutional ZT controversy there. ZT diffusion in Punjab has been hampered by institutional rivalry whereby \"some government agencies … have differences of opinion on the usefulness and the benefits of zero-tillage technology\" (Iqbal et al. 2002:677). This is also illustrated by Sheikh et al. (2003:90), who find a significantly negative association between the number of extension visits and ZT adoption, leading them to conclude that \"[t]his suggests that extension workers are not recommending the technology.\" Provincial agricultural extension is indeed not supportive of ZT wheat and this message is carried through in their extension campaigns and by their field staff. One of their fears is that ZT, by not plowing, may enhance over-wintering of the stem borer in the rice stubble which may undermine the productivity and competitiveness of basmati rice, a major export crop. However, there is no scientific evidence of such risk (Inayatullah et al. 1989;Srivastava et al. 2005). Filling the institutional vacuum, OFWM has played an important role in promoting this technology. This has created institutional rivalry between OFWM and agricultural extension with unfortunate implications for the farmers and the technology alike in Punjab, particularly in view of conflicting information. In contrast, the initial reluctance of many stakeholders vis-à-vis ZT in India was transformed into a significant support for ZT at all levels.Better understanding the rationale for disadoption merits further scrutiny. Our findings suggest that there is no clear single overarching constraint, but that a combination of factors is at play, including technology performance, technology access, seasonal constraints and, particularly in the case of Punjab, the institutional ZT controversy.In line with ZT drill sales and ZT use, ZT drill ownership is significantly less widespread in Punjab than in Haryana, being reported by 7 percent and 15 percent of the surveyed households, respectively. As expected, drill ownership was significantly higher for adopters, less common for dis-adopters and virtually absent for non-adopters in each site (table 4). The majority of ZT adopters therefore relied on contracted ZT drill services at the time of the survey in both sites (74% and 60% of ZT adopters, respectively). This is in line with the common tillage practices in these areas where many farmers do not own a tractor but rely on tillage contract services to get their fields prepared. Contracted ZT drill services have thereby made the technology accessible to smallholders without a tractor, whereas tractor owners can put off the investment decision. At the same time, the prevailing reliance on contractual services may constrain timely availability of the ZT drill and thereby (partially) forfeit the timely establishment of the wheat crop. Also, not all ZT drills are available for contract services: about a third of the operational ZT drills in Punjab were reportedly only used on the owners' farm during the last 3 years. Another study of ZT drill owners in Punjab found that only 40 percent were providing the drills on a rental basis (Khan et al. 2002:63). Anecdotal evidence suggests that large land-and tractor-owning farmers in Punjab are often reluctant to contract out their machinery -an issue also reported for the 2000-01 season (Iqbal et al. 2002:677). The varying access to ZT drills adds to the sitespecificity of findings. For instance, yet another study in Punjab revealed that the reasons for ZT users not purchasing a ZT drill included having easy access to drills on rent or free of cost from relatives/friends, drills still in an experimental phase and high drill costs (Tahir and Younas 2004). Yet, the same study also reported that 40 percent of ZT users claimed that the number of available drills was insufficient.Partial adoption of ZT on a share of the wheat area of the adopting farm seems to be the prevalent practice. In Punjab, this share averaged 74 percent in the survey year, as against 53 percent in Haryana. The adoption intensity could reflect differential access to a ZT drill: one might expect ZT drill owners to have higher adoption intensities than those reliant on ZT-service providers. However, in neither study area is there a significant difference in ZT area share between these two categories of ZT drill access in the survey year. This suggests that ZT access categories did not constrain the extent of ZT adoption in the survey year, provided they had access to a ZT drill in the first place. The adoption intensity could also vary between tractor owners and those reliant on tractor-service providers. One might expect tractor owners to have lower incentives for ZT use in view of the relative lower tillage costs on the farm (e.g., sunk cost of tractor and machinery, ensured and timely access, etc.) and ZT potentially negatively affecting their future income as providers of tractor services. In Punjab, there was no significant difference in terms of ZT area share between tractor owners and those reliant on tractor-service providers, but in Haryana there was a marked contrast. Here non-tractor owners had significantly higher ZT adoption intensities (>66% wheat area) than tractor owners (approximately 50% of wheat area, table 3). In Punjab, the ZT area share was also relatively constant over time, but in Haryana the ZT share decreased (table 3). This is primarily associated with early adopters devoting a larger area share to ZT than late adopters in Haryana, as ZT adopters typically maintain or increase their ZT area share over time (figure 6). Early adopters having a higher adoption intensity is somewhat contrary to expectations, but it can be explained by the relative contribution of tractor owners and non-tractor owners over time. In Haryana, the absolute number of both tractor owners and non-tractor owners adopting ZT increased over time, but the number of tractor owners (with their lower ZT adoption intensities) increased at a faster rate (table 3). Consequently, the relative share of non-tractor owners (with their higher ZT-adoption intensities) amongst ZT adopters in Haryana decreased from about half in 1999-2000 to a third in 2000-02 and less than a third in 2002-04 (table 3). A separate study in the Punjab area revealed that half the ZT users did not allocate the whole of their wheat area to ZT because they were still experimenting with the technology (Tahir and Younas 2004). Other reasons for partial area adoption in that study included the availability of enough time for CT (11% of cases), land not suitable for ZT (10%), nonavailability of ZT drill at sowing time (8%) and lack of proper knowledge (6%), and a range of perceived negative carryover effects in relation to ZT use (e.g., in terms of yield, soil compaction and tillage for subsequent rice). ZT adoption is also far from uniform, with significant variations in terms of penetration and use over districts and villages in both study sites (figure 7). In Haryana, the variations over districts seem to be associated with prevailing cropping systems, with dis-adoption more prevalent in both rice-wheat and sugarcane-based cropping systems. Although ZT promotion has emphasized rice-wheat districts in Haryana, ZT adoption is also spreading rapidly in districts where cotton-wheat predominates. Cotton-wheat systems tend to have the same problem of late wheat planting. However, in Punjab, ZT is even more controversial in cottonwheat systems because of feared carryover of bollworms on unincorporated cotton residues. In Punjab, ZT penetration (adoption + dis-adoption) is geographically concentrated in the rice-wheat heartland: the contiguous Sheikhupura, Gujranwala and Hafizabad districts. In these districts, 32-45 percent of surveyed farmers have tested the ZT drill, with 20-27 percent current adopters. The soils in these districts are relatively heavy, suggesting that the need for the ZT drill is relatively felt more in these areas. In the remaining three Punjab districts, ZT penetration was modest with 11-21 percent of surveyed farmers having tested the ZT drill. In both Haryana and Punjab, the district-level data show that a) an increased penetration of ZT is associated not only with increased adoption levels but also with increased dis-adoption levels; and b) ZT adopters typically outnumber dis-adopters. The assumed intensity of ZT promotion at the district level did not show a clear linkage to increased adoption rates, an issue likely associated with the technology primarily spreading from farmer to farmer in both study sites and the institutional rivalry in Punjab.In both Haryana and Punjab, village-wise adoption rates show a considerable gradient from none to saturation. The village-level data thereby allow for some important inferences. First, it illustrates that ZT penetration to individual villages was widespread but not comprehensive at the time of the survey in both Haryana and Punjab. Second, the gradient in village-wise adoption rates suggests that intrinsically there is nothing wrong with the technology itself, but that access and application of the technology may be an issue. Indeed, the fact that some villages are saturated and others show no dis-adoption suggests that ZT has considerable merit and wide applicability once the technology has proven itself within a community. Third, villagewise dis-adoption varies over the two study sites. In Haryana, the village-level data show that the average dis-adoption of 10 percent is typically piecemeal and only occasionally widespread and likely associated with crop diversification in favor of sugarcane and vegetables. In Punjab, dis-adoption seems to be concentrated in about half the villages where ZT had penetrated. Access to ZT drills varies over villages and is likely to have contributed to the observed adoption patterns.The ZT adopters, non-adopters and dis-adopters categories differ significantly in terms of their resource base in both study areas. For the various indicators compiled, adopters typically have the most favorable values and the non-adopters the least favorable, with dis-adopters taking an intermediate position. This has two important implications. First, it highlights that ZT adoption in the initial diffusion stage is strongly associated withThe previous chapter confirmed the significant adoption of ZT in Haryana and Punjab. However, it also highlighted that adoption is far from universal and that a significant share of households had become dis-adopters. This chapter synthesizes the differences at the household level that may help explain the decision to become adopters or dis-adopters. the wealth of the farm household, likely reflecting their risk-bearing capacity and ability to innovate. Second, it highlights that ZT dis-adopters combine characteristics of both adopters and non-adopters. The favorable characteristics may thereby facilitate the initial adoption of ZT, whereas the unfavorable characteristics undermine its continued use. Bivariate analysis of the various adoptionsurvey indicators highlighted contrasts and similarities between ZT adopters, dis-adopters and non-adopters in each site. Table 4 lists some of the factors that differed significantly, which included:• Farm and household assets: In both Haryana and Punjab, penetration of ZT (adoption + dis-adoption) was positively associated with the possession of farming assets (particularly a tractor and farm equipment) and household assets (particularly a car/vehicle and household appliances).• Land characteristics: In both Haryana and Punjab, adoption of ZT is positively associated with the size of operational holding, with dis-adopters having intermediate farm sizes. Adoption of ZT was also positively associated with the conjunctive use of canal and tube-well irrigation in both sites. Soils in Haryana tend to be lighter and betterdrained than in Punjab (farms with only [sandy] loam soils 67% and 46%, respectively; farms with well-drained land 97% and 57%, respectively). In Punjab, heavy soils and drainage problems are associated with continued ZT use. These soils would be more difficult to plow and so ZT would have more potential in reducing turnaround time. In Haryana, there was no significant association between soil type or drainage and ZT adoption. In Punjab, ZT adoption was also positively associated with farms having fallow land in the rabi season. In part, this is associated with the strong association of ZT with farm size; but it also reflects the potential of ZT to increase the area cultivated as compared to CT.• Sources of farm labor: In both Haryana and Punjab, adoption of ZT was positively associated with reliance on permanent labor and negatively associated with reliance on family labor. In Punjab, adoption of ZT was also positively associated with reliance on casual labor.Distance is associated with adoption and disadoption in each site, but no clear pattern emerges across the two sites. In Haryana, various proximity indicators were associated with dis-adoption, the latter likely reflecting the combined effect of exposure to ZT and diversification incentives. In Haryana, disadoption of ZT was also positively associated with the youth of household head and the Jat caste, whereas adoption of ZT was positively associated with the Jat Sikh caste. In Punjab, non-adoption was associated with a low literacy ratio. Family size, organizational membership and credit access indicators provided no clear association with adoption classes. In both Haryana and Punjab, farming was the main income source across households, contributing 80 percent or more of overall household income. In Haryana, the share of farming was significantly higher for adopters compared to non-adopters and dis-adopters (table 4). In Punjab, the share of farming was significantly higher for adopters and dis-adopters compared to non-adopters. This highlights a positive association of ZT adoption and penetration, respectively, with the farm households' reliance on agriculture for income. This agricultural specialization reflects their larger landholding and more commercial orientation.In Haryana, rice and wheat contributed about equal shares to household income (43% and 42%, respectively). In Punjab, the relative income share favors rice over wheat (51% and 32%, respectively), associated with the more widespread cultivation of high-value basmati rice. In our Haryana sample, adopters have taken the ricewheat specialization furthest. In Punjab, adopters and dis-adopters had a significantly higher relative contribution of rice to farm income compared to non-adopters, and the wheat share was similar. On average, rice and wheat crops occupied three-fourths of the total operational holding in Punjab, while slightly more than 15 percent of the farm size was allocated for fodder crops during both seasons. The combination of these factors likely enhances the incentives for adopters in Haryana and adopters and dis-adopters in Punjab to innovate and cut production costs in rice-wheat systems. In Haryana, dis-adoption of ZT was positively associated with sugarcane cultivation, which is often grown in a 2-year rotation with wheat. This reduced their reliance on rice-wheat systems whereas the prevailing tine-type ZT drills will not work without prior tillage in former sugarcane fields owing to the persistent rootstocks. To use ZT in such fields, heavier double-disc drills are needed that can cut through the rootstocks, and these only started becoming available in 2002-03.Each household was requested to rate a number of technical, extension and financial factors in terms of the degree they constrained the adoption of the ZT technology. The list of factors to be rated was largely similar for both study sites and all households irrespective of adoption category. Overall, the individual constraints were generally rated as less severe in Punjab than in Haryana. Therefore, instead of the absolute values, the relative values within each site are more revealing. The results of the ranking analysis are presented in table 5 and discussed subsequently.Compared to extension and financial factors, technical factors as a group rated relatively high in terms of constraining ZT adoption in Punjab, whereas they played a relatively lesser role in Haryana (table 5). The most pressing and revealing technical constraint is the yield of ZT relative to CT in both study areas. The single most serious constraint for dis-adopters was the reduced/low yield with ZT in Punjab (constraint index of 0.5, implying it is a moderate constraint) and the lack of a significant difference in yield in Haryana (constraint index of 0.5), contributing to their dis-adoption of the technology. The yield constraint also scored relatively high for nonadopters in Punjab, thereby adding to their reluctance to try the technology.The nonavailability of high-quality ZT drills was primarily raised by non-adopters in each site. In Haryana, non-adopters also highlighted the lack of local manufacturing and/or repair facilities for ZT drills. In Punjab, the nonavailability of the ZT drill on a rental basis was solely reported by some of the non-adopters. This suggests that there is still scope for further diffusion of the technology in both sites, and that these ZT-drillrelated constraints were not related to ZT disadoption.In Punjab, soil hardening was particularly reported by non-adopters and dis-adopters, but not really by adopters, suggesting this may either be a perceived issue or something related to the differences in soil types reported earlier. In Punjab, the weed problem at the time of planting was particularly mentioned by dis-adopters, possibly contributing to the dis-adoption decision, perceiving tillage as a more economical means for controlling the problem. The extension services in Punjab have discredited ZT for the perceived danger in pest carryover in the rice stubble (particularly rice stem borer). Interestingly, the risk of increased insect and disease problems was rated insignificant by the farmers across adoption categories in both sites.Compared to technical and financial factors, extension factors as a group rated relatively high in terms of constraining ZT adoption in Haryana, whereas they played a relatively lesser role in Punjab (table 5). This finding is contradictory to our expectations in view of the ZT controversy in Punjab and the public support for ZT in Haryana. In part, these findings may reflect the overall more lax scoring of constraints in Punjab and/or divergences in interpretation. Still, the \"lack of technical assistance from extension workers\" highlighted a significant and consistent difference between adoption categories in both sites. The same pattern emerges for the two other constraints in Haryana (\"nonavailability of extension literature on ZT methods\" and \"lack of coverage of ZT method by mass media\"). These extension constraints were consistently rated highest by non-adopters, suggesting that they lacked adequate access to ZT knowledge. This suggests there is still significant scope for further enhancing ZT adoption by alleviating knowledge blockages, possibly through farmer to farmer extension which so far is the prevailing source of ZT information. Adopters and dis-adopters gave similar ratings for these extension constraints, suggesting that the knowledge of ZT technology was not an underlying reason for disadopting its use.The most serious financial constraint was the perceived high cost of the ZT drill in both sites (table 5), particularly being reported by nonadopters. However, dis-adopters in Haryana also rated this constraint significantly higher than adopters, suggesting this is one factor that also contributed to their dis-adoption of ZT. Again in Haryana, non-adopters' ratings for the remaining three financial indicators (in relation to resources and credit) were consistently highest, but there was no significant difference between adopters and dis-adopters. This reiterates that the nonadopters in Haryana are more resourceconstrained, and that this may have contributed to their reluctance to adopt ZT so far.A separate study suggests that ZT diffusion in the Punjab study area is constrained by the lack of financial resources, lack or untimely availability of ZT drills and lack of familiarity among the smallholders (Jehangir et al. 2007).A multivariate analysis with a logit regression model allows us to include various indicators in a single adoption model to analyze their combined effect on the likelihood of ZT adoption. For each site we present two different binomial logit models (table 6). The first model reflects the penetration of ZT, using as dependent variable whether the household ever used ZT. The second model reflects the current use of ZT, using as dependent variable whether the household used ZT in the survey year . The contrasts between the two models highlight some of the factors particularly associated with dis-adoption.In Haryana, the binomial logit models reiterate that ZT adoption is closely associated with ZT promotion, remoteness, farm size, assets and rice-wheat specialization. Canal irrigation enhanced, and predominantly light soils reduced, the likelihood of trying out the technology, but did not significantly affect the likelihood of its continued use.In Punjab, the binomial logit models reiterate that ZT adoption is again closely associated with farm size and rice-wheat specialization. ZT promotion, having more physical assets and not belonging to the prevailing caste, played an important role in trying out ZT, but less so in continuing with its use. Conversely, predominantly light soils reduced the likelihood of continued ZT use. The negative role of light soils in both models likely reflects that these soils would be easier to plow and so the potential time saving of ZT is less important since turnaround time would already be fast (Hobbs pers. comm. 2007, Ithaca).Characteristics of farm households therefore contribute significantly to the explanation of the observed adoption and dis-adoption patterns, given that the explanatory power of the adoption models could be enhanced by including other variables at the household, community or regional level. For instance, our models do not adequately capture some features of the ZT innovation process, such as local ZT champions and the functioning (or absence) of ZT service providers. In the end though, adoption and dis-adoption can be expected to reflect the underlying performance of the technology in the farmers' fields, an issue we explore in the next chapter. there. Although we cannot test or control for all such considerations, the available data at least show no significant difference in terms of soil type between ZT and CT plots on adopter farms.We therefore prefer to err on the safe side and assume that the comparison between the ZT plots and CT plots of adopters is the least-biased assessment of ZT's impact. The first section of this chapter synthesizes the effects on the wheat crop. The second section synthesizes the carryover effects on the rice crop. The third section sums up.The CT wheat establishment practice in both Haryana and Punjab involves intensive tractor tillage and broadcasting of wheat. ZT drastically reduces tractor operations in farmers' ZT wheat fields from an average of eight passes to a single pass, implying a per ha saving of 6 and 7 tractor hours and 36 and 35 liters of diesel in Haryana and Punjab, respectively (table 7). Earlier diagnostic studies reported an average of six tillage operations in Punjab (ranging from 2 to 10; Byerlee et al. 1984) and eight tillage operations in Haryana (4-8 on lighter soils and 8-12 on heavier soils; Harrington et al. 1993), followed by another tractor cultivation after broadcasting. Our study highlights that the current CT practices do not deviate much from the earlier studies. It was only in Haryana that mechanized sowing had gained ground, being now reported in 32 percent of CT fields, whereas broadcasting still prevailed in Punjab. The total number of tillage operations in CT wheat plots (including any cultivation to cover broadcast seed) also did not vary between the two study areas (8.2 in Haryana and 8.1 in Punjab), soil types or adopter categories. Therefore, contrary to expectations, the diffusion of ZT has, so far, not resulted in any reduction in \"conventional\" tillage intensity.The ZT-induced time savings in land preparation did not translate into a timelier On-station and on-farm trials with ZT wheat in the rice-wheat systems of the IGP have shown primarily positive impacts on wheat-crop management, particularly through reduced input needs combined with potential yield increases (Hobbs and Gupta 2003b;Laxmi et al. 2007;Malik et al. 2002a;Malik et al. 2005a). At the same time, no major carryover effects on the subsequent rice are reported (Inayatullah et al. 1989;Srivastava et al. 2005). This chapter presents the technical impacts of ZT technology in farmers' fields, by synthesizing survey results of how the farmers' use of ZT has reportedly affected crop management and productivity of the rice-wheat system. In doing so, we will primarily contrast the ZT fields and CT fields on adopter farms in the two study sites. The detailed country studies also present the information for the CT fields of non-adopters and dis-adopters (Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007). The previous chapter has highlighted significant differences at the household level that helped explain the disadoption decision, but these were also found to significantly influence crop management practices, yields and water productivity (Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007). Adopters and dis-adopters may have adapted their \"conventional\" crop management practices after having used ZT. However, contrasting our \"conventional\" data with earlier diagnostic studies (Byerlee et al. 1984;Harrington et al. 1993) suggests that this is not the case. Furthermore, in the absence of a real baseline, we cannot unambiguously establish causality. Partial ZT adoption prevails and thereby enables us to limit ourselves to adopter farms, but this may also introduce a new bias. Partial adopters have purposively chosen to apply ZT to one field and CT to another in the survey year. Typically, such choice is influenced by a number of considerations and field characteristics. For instance, a partial adopter may be using ZT on relatively less-productive soils and CT on better ones because ZT is still under evaluation in the early adoption phase and/or CT performs poorly establishment, with insignificant differences in planting dates between ZT and CT in both Haryana and Punjab (table 7). This is contrary to expectations, but a similar finding was reported in another study (Tahir and Younas 2004). Ownership of a tractor did significantly advance the wheat-sowing date in both sites, albeit with only 2 days. It was only in Punjab that the ownership of a ZT drill significantly advanced the sowing date for ZT plots by 8 days, suggesting that reliance on ZT service providers delays wheat establishment. The type of preceding rice crop proved rather influential in Haryana, where the average wheat planting date varied significantly depending on the farms' rice specialization: for superfine rice it was 9 November; for evolved basmati 13 November; and for traditional basmati, 15 November (p=0.00, n=474). The use of the ZT drill is potentially seedsaving compared to broadcasting, without any yield loss. It is also potentially fertilizer-saving, particularly using the ZT seed-cum-fertilizer drill which places the basal fertilizer in the planted row at the time of planting. Yet, ZT was not observed to have any significant effect on seed rate or chemical fertilizer use in either site. Similarly, no effect on weed and pest management was apparent (table 7).In Haryana, ZT achieved the highest wheat yields in the survey year (4.4 metric tons per hectare [mt/ha]), a significant 4.0 percent yield increase over CT (4.2 mt/ha, table 8). However, in Punjab, ZT did not have a significant effect on the mean farmer-estimated wheat yield of 3.3 mt/ha. A positive yield effect of ZT is often associated with more timely wheat establishment in view of the terminal heat stress for late planted wheat in South Asia (Hobbs and Gupta 2003a;Laxmi et al. 2007). Both sites indeed highlight a significant and similar negative correlation between wheat yield and sowing date in surveyed plots (Julian day number, correlation coefficient: -0.15, prob. 0.00). Wheat plots established before November 16 yielded significantly more (200 kg/ha) compared to plots established thereafter in both sites. However, as mentioned above, although ZT reduces turnaround time, there was no significant difference in terms of time of wheat establishment between ZT and CT plots in the survey year. This suggests that farmers have generally been reluctant to significantly advance their wheat planting date despite apparently increased opportunities to do so with ZT. In Punjab, wheat grown on (sandy) loam or welldrained soils also yielded significantly more (200 kg/ha) compared to heavier or poorly drained soils in the survey year, but no significant interaction with ZT was apparent. A separate study in Punjab also reports a mixed wheat yield effect of ZT, with 54 percent of farmers reporting a yield increase, 30 percent a decrease and 16 percent no change (Ahmad et al. 2007).To put the survey year in perspective, wheat yields under ZT and CT on surveyed farms were also compiled for previous seasons. The recall data for the three preceding years do not show significant differences in ZT and CT yields in both sites (figure 8). In Haryana, average wheat yields in the preceding years were significantly higher than in the survey year. This suggests that ZT plots in Haryana were less susceptible to yield loss in the survey year, contributing to the observed yield advantage over CT, possibly through better soil-moisture conservation. The survey year indeed was relatively dry and had above-average maximum temperatures in both March and April (more than 10 ºC over a 30-year average; Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, unpublished data), which adversely affected wheat yields. The general lack of a yield increase largely reflects the fact that the ZT-induced time savings in land preparation did not translate into timelier establishment. The overall late wheat establishment in Punjab likely contributed to the lack of a yield-effect, as the relative performance of ZT tends to be better in timely sown wheat (Malik et al. 2002a). The lack of a significant yield effect has undermined widespread ZT acceptance and is a major factor explaining dis-adoption in Punjab. Without a yield benefit, the immediate payoff to ZT is reduced to its cost-saving potential, primarily for land preparation and establishment.The water use indicators from the adoption survey for ZT and CT wheat were generally not significantly different in both sites. ZT did reduce the duration of the first tube-well irrigation in both sites, which is associated with irrigation water flowing faster over untilled fields. Consequently, generally less irrigation water is applied to ZT during the first irrigation. This is generally beneficial as, in tilled fields, often too much water is applied to parts of the field resulting in Mean farmer-estimated wheat yields (all surveyed plots) in Haryana (4.2 mt/ha) are substantially higher than in Punjab (3.3 mt/ha), a differential that is likely associated with the later wheat establishment and lower fertilizer use in Punjab and agro-ecological differences. Across all surveyed plots, water productivity was estimated to average 2.5 kg of wheat per irrigation m 3 and 1.5 kg of wheat per gross m 3 in Haryana, whereas the same indicators for Punjab were 1.5 kg and 1.0 kg of wheat, respectively. The lower water productivity in Punjab is the combined result of lower wheat yields and larger water input.The prevailing practice in both Haryana and Punjab is to transplant rice in puddled fields and keep the fields ponded. ZT wheat did not have any significant spillover effect in terms of waterlogging and yellowing of wheat plants. However, in neither site did ZT have any significant effect on the total number of irrigations (3.4/season), duration of subsequent and total irrigations and the estimated irrigation volume (table 7). The higher yield in combination with the limited water savings still results in significantly higher water productivity indicators for ZT wheat compared to CT wheat in Haryana (table 8). The relatively similar yields in the survey year, combined with the relatively modest irrigation savings by ZT, imply that water productivity indicators are generally not significantly different from CT in Punjab (table 8).The results therefore provide some support to the postulated water saving nature of ZT. Still one should realize that the results presented here relate to survey findings, which are subject to farmer recall and where we cannot control for all underlying sources of variation. These confounding effects may mask some of the ZT technology effects, if any. A separate water use survey conducted within the context of the Haryana study indeed showed more significant water savings attributable to ZT than those observed in the adoption survey (Erenstein et al. 2007a).This survey confirmed that ZT for wheat saves irrigation time (6.4 hours/ha/season), saves irrigation water (340 m 3 /ha/season) and enhances wheat yield (260 kg/ha), but ZT again did not significantly reduce the number of irrigations. According to the same survey, total tube-well water volume applied to ZT amounted to 2,200 m 3 compared to 2,500 m 3 for CT, a statistically significant water saving of 13.4 percent which was primarily achieved in the first irrigation. This implied significantly higher water productivity indicators for ZT wheat (1.5 kg/gross m 3 ) compared to CT wheat (1.3 kg/gross m 3 , p.:0.00) in Haryana.The discussion so far focused on the specific contrast between ZT and CT in the two study sites. The available data however also highlight some similarities and contrasts between the two sites. On average, across all surveyed plots, Haryana and Punjab reported relatively similar wheat management practices, for instance in terms of CT practices, weedings (1.0 weeding after transplanting vs. 123 days for both varieties of basmati) and is transplanted earlier, thereby vacating the field 3 weeks earlier than traditional basmati. These varietal groups had a marked effect on rice-management practices (e.g., nutrient, water, harvest; Erenstein et al. 2007a). Superfine rice is also higher yielding (5.9 mt/ha) than evolved basmati (4.5 mt/ha) or traditional basmati (2.6 mt/ha) and has the highest physical water productivity (0.5 kg/ irrigation m 3 and 0.3 kg/gross m 3 ). In Punjab, super basmati is the prevailing rice variety reported in 88 percent of plots and has a similar yield as the other basmati varieties being reported for the remaining plots. Super basmati is late maturing (130 days after transplanting vs. 123 days for other varieties) and is transplanted late, thereby vacating the field nearly 2 weeks later than the other varieties, and thus highly conflicting with optimum wheat sowing. ZT potentially reduces the turnaround time between rice and wheat. One might thus expect a positive association between rice varieties that vacate the field late and the use of ZT wheat. However, no significant association was found, except for traditional basmati being less commonly cultivated by dis-adopters in Haryana (which may thus have reduced the need to continue with ZT).Harvesting rice mechanically with a combine harvester is markedly more common in Punjab (79% of plots) than in Haryana (38%) in the survey year. This is associated with the rice varieties being grown. In Haryana, superfine rice is predominantly combine harvested (82% of plots), whereas the basmati varieties were universally hand-harvested for a number of reasons, including the tendency of its long grains to break, being more prone to lodging (reducing the effectiveness of mechanical harvesting), smaller field sizes and more intensive residue use (Erenstein et al. 2007d). In Punjab, super basmati is typically combine harvested (81%) whereas this is less common for the other basmati varieties (55%). The popularity of combine harvesting of rice in Punjab is also associated with the larger farm size, limited turnaround time between rice and wheat and the affecting crop management, yield and water productivity of subsequent rice crop in both Haryana and Punjab. Most significant differences between surveyed rice plots reflect structural differences between adopters and non-adopters (Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007). Actual differences between rice plots after ZT wheat and rice plots after CT wheat for adopters were typically not significant (table 9; table 10). One exception was the above-average pesticide use in rice after ZT wheat plots in Punjab (applied to 92% of ZT plots compared to 83% of CT plots).Surveyed rice crop management indicators for Haryana and Punjab (all surveyed plots) included:• Tillage operations (average of 5.3 and 9.1/ season in Haryana and Punjab, respectively).• Seed rate (11 and 8.8 kg/ha of seed, respectively).• Chemical fertilizer use (204 kg/ha of fertilizernutrients, 156:44:4 and 132 kg/ha, 98:34:0, respectively).• Weed management (1.7 and 0.9 weedings, respectively).• Pesticide use (89% and 83% of plots, respectively).• Irrigation (34 and 35 irrigations/season, respectively).• Harvesting practices (62% and 21% manual, respectively). Various rice-management practices thus differ substantially between Haryana and Punjab. As in the case of wheat, Haryana has a substantially higher chemical fertilizer use. Tillage for rice is markedly more intensive for Punjab, whereas Haryana tends to do more weedings. In both sites, chemical weed control is the dominant method, but in Haryana this is often supplemented by a manual weed control.In Haryana, three groups of high-quality rice varieties were reported in the surveyed rice plots: superfine rice varieties (46.5% of plots), evolved basmati (30.2%) and traditional basmati (23.2%). Superfine rice is of shorter duration (117 days fact that mean rice harvesting date is 3 weeks later than in Haryana. The latter is the combined effect of later rice transplanting (12 days: 6 July vs. 24 June in Punjab and Haryana, respectively) and longer duration of the rice crop (9 days: 129 vs. 120 days in Punjab and Haryana, respectively). Combine harvesting has implications for ZT. The loose residues left by the combiner hamper the operation of the prevailing ZT drills and are typically removed or burned. Untimely rain prior to rice harvesting may also cause combiners to cause ruts in the fields that need to be evened out through tillage.Compared to Punjab, in Haryana the removal of rice straw from the field was less common (reported in 84% against 58% plots, respectively) and rice straw burning was relatively similar (56% against 47%, respectively). The differential management practices, varieties and overall agro-ecology contribute to the mean farmer-estimated paddy yields (all surveyed plots) in Haryana (4.7 mt/ha) again being substantially higher than in Punjab (3.5 mt/ ha). Water productivity was estimated to average 0.34 kg of paddy per irrigation m 3 and 0.23 kg of paddy per gross m 3 for all surveyed rice plots in Haryana whereas the same indicators for Punjab were 0.28 kg and 0.22 kg of paddy, respectively. The lower water productivity in Punjab is primarily a reflection of the lower paddy yields, as estimated water input was relatively similar (table 9). Water productivity indicators for rice is markedly lower than that for wheat, largely a reflection of significantly higher water inputs in paddy cultivation so as to maintain standing water in the paddies during the hot monsoonal season with relatively similar yields. Rice cultivation practices also differ from wheat in terms of:• Intensity of land preparation (in Haryana less tractor passes but including wet cultivation; in Punjab one more tractor pass and wet cultivation).• Fertilization practices (less inorganic fertilizer use and more farmyard manure).• Pesticide use (near-universal).• Harvesting practices (less reliance on combine harvesting in Haryana; wider reliance on combine harvesting in Punjab).The underlying studies cannot unambiguously confirm that the generally favorable implications of ZT in terms of enhancing wheat yield and saving water reported in trials are also achieved in farmers' fields. It was only in Haryana that ZT had significant positive effects on yield and water productivity for the wheat crop in the survey year. Both studies concur in that there were no significant effects on yield and water productivity for the subsequent rice crop. Both studies also confirmed the drastic reduction in tractor time and diesel use in wheat land preparation and establishment, which imply substantial cost savings. primarily a reflection of the higher land rent ($126 difference). Due to the relatively low net returns in Haryana the average net-revenue-based water productivities thereby amount to only $0.033 per irrigation m 3 and $0.017 per gross m 3 , whereas the corresponding values for Punjab are $0.069 and 0.044, respectively.ZT plots in Haryana show significantly lower total costs and significantly higher gross and net revenues. Compared to the CT plots of adopters, ZT shows a conclusive net advantage of $69 per ha in the survey year, composed of a \"yield effect\" of $26 and a \"cost saving effect\" of $43 (table 11). The ZT-induced cost saving is substantial, and represents a saving of 7.0 percent on total costs, or 15.3 percent on operational costs (excluding land). The relatively minor net revenues derived from wheat cultivation underscore the need for continued yield enhancement and cost savings to maintain wheat competitiveness in rice-wheat systems. It also highlights the relative significance of the ZTinduced income enhancement, which boosts returns well above breakeven. Indeed, 92 percent of ZT plots had positive net revenues. ZT plots thereby achieved a significantly higher return on production costs (17%) and significantly higher estimates for net-revenue-based water productivities ($0.08/ irrigation m 3 and $0.042/ gross m 3 -table 12). The combination of a significant \"yield effect\" and \"cost saving effect\" makes ZT adoption worthwhile and is the main driver behind the rapid spread and widespread acceptance of ZT in Haryana.The difference between ZT and CT plots in Punjab is less pronounced and therefore less conclusive. Gross revenue does not significantly differ between wheat plots, but compared to nonadopters and dis-adopters, adopters achieved significantly lower total costs and higher net revenues in both their ZT and CT plots. Compared to the CT plots of adopters, ZT does imply a significant cost-saving effect of $45 per ha, but this was partially annulled by a nonsignificant negative yield effect of $20,The financial implications of a new technology are a major determinant of technological change. The on-station and on-farm trials with ZT wheat in the rice-wheat systems of the IGP do not always include a financial analysis (Laxmi et al. 2007;Malik et al. 2002a;Malik et al. 2005a). But in those where such an analysis was included, results are generally very favorable for ZT due to the combined \"yield-enhancement effect\" and \"cost-saving effect\" (e.g., Laxmi et al. 2007;Malik et al. 2005a). Most financial analyses are based on partial budgets, and typically limited to the wheat crop.The previous chapter reviewed the technical impact of ZT in terms of crop management and productivity for both the wheat crop and the subsequent rice crop. The present chapter puts a monetary value on the observed changes and thereby allows us to aggregate the observed technical impacts and assess the financial impact of ZT at the individual crop and plot levels. The first section of this chapter reviews the ZT effects on the wheat-crop budget. The second section reviews the carryover effects on the ricecrop budget. The third section aggregates the wheat-and rice-crop budget effects to derive the crop-system effects at the plot level.On an average hectare basis (across all surveyed plots), wheat production implies a gross revenue of $654 and 581, total costs of $619 and 473 and a net revenue of $36 and 108 in Haryana and Punjab, respectively (Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007). This implies an average return of 6 percent and 23 percent to production costs, with 68 percent and 81 percent of wheat plots having positive net revenues in Haryana and Punjab, respectively. Although yields and gross revenue are higher in Haryana, this is annulled by the higher production costs resulting in more meager returns to wheat production. The higher production costs in Haryana ($146 difference) are resulting in a nonsignificant advantage of $25 for ZT in terms of net revenue (table 11). The ZTinduced cost saving is again substantial, and represents a saving of 9.5 percent on total costs, or 16.4 percent on operational costs (excluding land). ZT plots thereby achieved a significantly higher return on production costs (a respectable 37%) and significantly higher net-revenue-based water productivities ($0.097/ irrigation m 3 and $0.06/gross m 3 -table 12). The ZT \"costs-saving effect\" seems robust enough to make adoption worthwhile and is the driver behind the prior spread of ZT amongst adopters in Punjab. However, learning costs eat into the costs-saving effect and may undermine the apparent returns to adoption for prospective adopters, particularly in view of the lack of a positive yield effect. On an average hectare basis (across all surveyed plots), rice production implies a gross revenue of $849 and 804, total costs of $757 and 563 and a net revenue of $92 and 241 in Haryana and Punjab, respectively (Erenstein et al. 2007a;Farooq et al. 2007). This implies an average return of 13 percent and 46 percent to production costs, with 67 percent and 91 percent of rice plots having positive net revenue in Haryana and Punjab, respectively. Although paddy yields and gross revenue were again higher in Haryana, this was annulled by the higher production costs resulting in lower returns to paddy production. The higher production costs in Haryana ($194 difference) are again primarily a reflection of the higher land rent ($126 difference). The net-revenue-based water productivities amounted to $0.008 and 0.025 per irrigation m 3 and $0.005 and 0.02 per gross m 3 in Haryana and Punjab, respectively. The large differences in water productivities in the two sites are primarily a reflection of the difference in net revenue, as estimated water input was relatively similar. Compared to wheat, financial water productivity is lower for paddy, the higher net revenues for rice being more than annulled by the higher water inputs.Prior ZT wheat does not significantly affect gross revenue, production cost, net revenue or financial water productivity of the subsequent rice crop in either Haryana or Punjab (table 13; table 14). In Haryana, the type of rice variety had a significantly more pronounced effect on the The relative performance at the aggregate ricewheat system level primarily mirrors the ZT effects on wheat performance, although the effects tend to be more subdued. In the case of Haryana, the higher wheat gross revenue with ZT was annulled by the nonsignificant variation in paddy gross revenue. In both Haryana and Punjab, the significant ZT-induced cost saving was maintained (table 15). For the other indicators, ZT and CT plots of adopters typically tend to outperform non-adopters and disadopters, but did not differ significantly from each other on adopter farms in both sites. This also applies to the financial water productivity indicators at the system level (table 16). We can therefore conclude that financial ZT effects are limited to the wheat crop, with no significant positive or negative carryover effects for the rice-wheat system as a whole. For significant improvements at the system level we would need to alter the way rice is grown to dry directseeded rice and start retaining crop residues as mulch. As long as the rice crop remains puddled, the ZT gains for wheat remain purely seasonal with no cumulative gains in terms of enhanced soil productivity and water productivity at the cropping-system level.The impact of the ZT technology so far was assessed in technical and financial terms at the plot level. Some of the higher system-level implications are discussed in this section. At the first level we assess the farm-level implications of ZT for the adopting farms. At the second level we assess the regional implications of ZT including social and environmental considerations.In both Haryana and Punjab, adopters and disadopters were near-unanimous that they spent less time cultivating wheat after adoption of ZT. The time thus saved was primarily used for other agricultural activities, and to a lesser extent for more leisure time and other nonagricultural activities. Adopters and dis-adopters generally agreed that the adoption of ZT did not reduce the time for cultivating rice. In both Haryana and Punjab, adopters and dis-adopters differed significantly in terms of whether ZT had increased the family's income, with the majority of adopters and only a minority of dis-adopters reporting an increase. It was only in Punjab that the adoption of ZT reportedly increased the family's food consumption, with nearly half the adopters reporting an increase. As there was no significant yield increase linked to the adoption of ZT in Punjab, this may reflect the ZT-induced cost savings and correspondingly higher disposable income being used to enhance family food consumption.In terms of changes in farming activities, adopters and dis-adopters in both sites reported primarily productivity effects of ZT proper, with most farmers reporting time and cost savings. In the case of Haryana, it is interesting to note that the reporting of the various ZT-related benefits was markedly less pronounced for dis-adopters, which suggests that they typically had less successful experiences with ZT, leading to their dis-adoption with the technology. In the case of Punjab, adopters and dis-adopters largely concurred in terms of the ZT-related benefits. This reiterates that in Punjab, ZT dis-adoption reflected a complex of factors. For some disadopters, the yield considerations reported earlier were paramount and thereby nullified time and cost-saving considerations. Other dis-adopters may have had such favorable perceptions, but unable to act upon them in view of problematic access to the ZT drill in the survey year.This study provides some support to the postulated water-saving nature of ZT wheat at the field scale. The water use survey, particularly in Haryana, showed that ZT for wheat saves irrigation time (6.4 hours/ha/season), saves irrigation water (340 m 3 /ha/season) and enhances wheat yield (260 kg/ha). The absence of any reported significant change in farm activities or area cultivated in both sites suggests that these water savings generally did not lead to an immediate alternative use of the water saved on the farm. Instead, the reduced water applications at the field scale seem to have primarily saved irrigation time and irrigation cost and reduced groundwater extraction for the ZT wheat crop compared to the CT wheat crop. A different study in the Punjab rice-wheat area reported that the water savings from resource-conserving technologies actually increased water demand and groundwater depletion through expansion in cropped area on medium-and large-scale farms (Ahmad et al. 2007). In Haryana, any significant area expansion was unlikely, as rabi fallow is uncommon (only 1.8% of households reported some rabi fallow, with an average 99% of the operational area being cultivated during the rabi season). In Punjab, rabi fallow is more common (18% of households reported some rabi fallow, averaging 0.35 ha/household) and was found to be positively associated with ZT adoption. Part of the incentive to adopt ZT in Punjab may have thus been the potential of ZT to increase the area cultivated in rabi -although we cannot unambiguously make this assertion based on the available data. In any case, the eventual increase in area due to ZT may still be limited by the overall limited fallow area even in Punjab (with an average 97% of the operational area already being cultivated during the rabi season).In both Haryana and Punjab, adopters typically have a more favorable resource base and tended to variously outperform non-adopters and dis-adopters, irrespective of their use of ZT. The carryover effects on the rice crop were typically insignificant, although their inclusion tended to dampen the significance of the observed effects at the system level. The present section therefore limits itself to scaling up of the observed significant effects between the adopters' ZT plots and CT plots for the wheat crop.With an average ZT wheat area of 5.0 and 8.3 ha per household in Haryana and Punjab, respectively, ZT adopters save an average of 180 and 288 liters of diesel, 30 and 57 tractor hours and $210 and 374 per season at the farm level, respectively. In Haryana, ZT adopters also gain 0.9 mt of wheat grain per season at the farm level. This implies an increase of $132 in gross return that, combined with the cost saving, results in an increase of $342 in net revenue in Haryana.Most ZT-adopting households have postponed the investment decision to buy a ZT drill with the majority of adopters (60% and 74% in Haryana and Punjab, respectively) being service-provider dependent in the survey year. Rental markets make the ZT drill divisible and therefore accessible irrespective of farm size, but do imply increased dependence on timely and effective service delivery. The lack or untimely availability of drills and the high drill cost, particularly in Punjab, have been raised as issues limiting ZT diffusion (Jehangir et al. 2007;Tahir and Younas 2004). To put the investment in a ZT drill in perspective, we have estimated the ZT drill investment recovery indicator -the number of wheat seasons needed to recap the investment. The cost saving alone implies the average ZT adopter would recover the ZT drill purchase within 1.9 and 1.5 wheat seasons in Haryana and Punjab, respectively. In the case where ZT adopters extended ZT to their whole wheat area (i.e., an additional wheat area of 4.0 and 5.8 ha/ household, respectively), they could recover a ZTD investment within 1.0 and 0.9 wheat seasons. Adding the yield gain, the ZTD investment recovery in Haryana would be in 1.2 wheat seasons on current ZT area alone and 0.6 seasons in case ZT is extended to the whole wheat area. Providing ZT drill rental services would further shorten the time needed to recap the investment. This suggests that the ZT drill investment cost is not prohibitive for an average ZT adopter already owning a tractor.ZT adopters have the largest farms and wheat areas and therefore potentially benefit most on an aggregate-household basis from a costsaving technology such as ZT (table 4). In both Haryana and Punjab, the average dis-adopter household could conceivably recover a ZT drill investment within 1.7 wheat seasons based on cost savings alone. The average non-adopter household could conceivably recover a ZT drill investment within 1.9 and 3.1 wheat seasons, respectively. Tractor ownership was also least common amongst non-adopters (table 4). This highlights that the investment in a ZT drill is typically less attractive for the dis-adopters and particularly for non-adopters compared to adopters, unless they would be able to benefit from providing significant ZT drill rental services.The diesel and tractor time savings are major contributors to the ZT-induced cost savings and apply to tractor-owning and tractor-hiring households alike. Indeed, the tractor time saving is beneficial to tractor-owning households through both extended tractor lifetime and alternative use, tractors being variously used and in much demand. The alternative tractor uses are particularly important for the income security of tractor-service providers, as an eventual increase in income from ZT services is likely to be offset by a more than proportional decrease in traditional tillage services.In both sites, ZT wheat had limited effects on the subsequent rice crop in the same field. ZT wheat also seems to have had few discernible effects on other farm activities of the household, including other crops, livestock and nonfarm activities. Livestock are dependent on the wheat and rice residues, but ZT wheat has so far had limited implications for crop-residue management. This reflects the prevailing harvesting, residuecollection and residue-burning practices for the preceding rice crop with generally still limited consideration for the retention of crop residues as mulch -a necessary component of conservation agriculture. ZT-induced labor savings were relatively minor in view of the prevailing mechanization levels and crop management practices.With rice still being cultivated in the traditional way in the subsequent season, ZTinduced enhancement of land quality is relatively short-lived. Farm-level impact of ZT thereby primarily reflects immediate effects on the wheat crop budget through cost savings and, in the case of Haryana, additional yield effects. The ZTinduced yield enhancement in the survey year in Haryana seemed, at least in part, attributable to the less favorable weather for wheat growth, ZT being relatively less adversely affected than CT wheat despite similar planting dates. The reduced yield variability has important implications for overall farm risk management and enhanced income stability.According to expert estimates, 0.35 and 0.3 mha of wheat were planted by ZT drill during 2003-04 in Haryana and Punjab (RWC 2004), respectively. Extrapolating our plot-level findings to this area, ZT implied a saving of 12.6 and 10.4 million liters of diesel, 2.1 and 2.1 million tractor hours and $14.6 and 13.5 million in production costs per season, respectively. In Haryana, ZT also implied a gain of 60,000 mt grain per wheat season. In financial terms, Haryana had a net income increase of $23.9 million per season, comprising the aforementioned \"cost saving effect\" of $14.6 million and a \"yield effect\" of $9.2 million. If we assume that ZT can be extended to a third of the total rice-wheat area in India and Pakistan (10.4 and 2.2 mha, respectively), these aggregate benefits would be conceivably increased with a factor of 9.8 in India and 2.4 in Pakistan, respectively. However, particularly the Punjab study flags the significant ZT dis-adoption, which thereby questions the extent to which these larger regional savings will be actually realized.Water is a major concern for the sustainability of intensive cropping systems in both Haryana and Punjab and for the Indian and Pakistan economy as a whole (e.g., Briscoe and Malik 2006). Perhaps somewhat disappointingly, the adoption surveys could not unambiguously verify that ZT generated significant water savings. In part, this is likely due to measurement errors in view of our survey estimates. Nonetheless, the farmer responses imply there is some water saving, but maybe less significant than often alluded. Only the water use survey in Haryana verified that ZT generated significant water savings in wheat fields.The present study concurs with other studies that resource conserving technologies (RCTs) like ZT can be successful in improving field-scale irrigation efficiency through irrigation savings (Ahmad et al. 2007;Gupta et al. 2002;Humphreys et al. 2005;Jehangir et al. 2007). However, as highlighted by Ahmad et al. (2007:1), \"whether or not improved irrigation efficiency translates to 'real' water savings depends on the hydrologic interactions between the field and farm, the irrigation system and the entire river basin. In fact, the water saving impacts of RCTs beyond the field level are not well understood and documented.\" For instance, some of the irrigation water \"saved\" would be simply recycled, percolating into the groundwater table from where it would later be reused by farmers through pumping (Ahmad et al. 2007). This calls for more systematic assessments of water balance components at farm to system scales (Ahmad et al. 2007;Jehangir et al. 2007).In any event, the irrigation water savings with ZT in wheat are still modest. To put the water savings for ZT wheat further in perspective it is useful to recall that irrigation input for rice is a multiple of that of wheat (a factor of 8.4 in Haryana and 5.9 in Punjab, based on our average survey data). In part, this reflects higher potential evapotranspiration of rice (640 mm) as compared to wheat (330 mm; Ullah et al. 2001). In the case of wheat, the actual evapotranspiration is generally lower than the potential requirement (Ahmad et al. 2002;Jehangir et al. 2007). However, in the case of rice irrigation, water applied is significantly higher than crop water requirement (Ahmad et al. 2007). This highlights that there is significantly more scope for reducing irrigation water input for rice than for wheat without yield loss. Significant irrigation water savings can indeed be achieved with resource conserving technologies in rice (some 30-40%), although these are typically derived from the recycled water component and do not reduce actual evapotranspiration (Ahmad et al. 2007;Humphreys et al. 2005). Therefore, in terms of regional water savings, enhancing water productivity of the rice component of the ricewheat system will be imperative.Water rights and institutional arrangements further confound the picture. Despite a gradual increase in water scarcity at the subbasin or basin scales, improving water productivity and achieving real water savings remain secondary concerns for most rice-wheat farmers (Ahmad et al. 2007). The current attraction of ZT in wheat indeed primarily relates to the cost savings and not the water savings as such. This is likely to remain as long as farmers are not charged according to their actual water use and do not pay the real (economic) cost of water. But this implies making politically unpopular adjustments to (ground)water rights and the subsidy and taxation schemes that currently undermine the sustainability of rice-wheat systems.The study does flag some equity concerns as ZT uptake and the corresponding benefits are positively associated with farm size in each study area. Although, in principle, accessible to smallholders through service providers, various constraints have limited its uptake amongst smallholders. In the present context, the tractor and cost-saving nature of ZT wheat have relatively limited implications for labor use. Consequently, whereas ZT, by necessity, has bypassed landless, it also seems to have had limited negative impact on the landless through labor displacement. Monitoring and better understanding the equity implications of extending ZT and RCTs to the rice component of the ricewheat system are imperative.The ZT-induced fuel savings imply a significant positive environmental externality by reducing CO 2 emissions, a significant contributor to global warming. The widespread burning of rice residues at land preparation time for the subsequent wheat crop in the rice-wheat tract is generating a significant negative externality in terms of significant air pollution. Conservation agriculture implies retaining some crop residues as mulch (i.e., soil cover) but, to date, ZT in the study areas has not had a significant effect on the practice of residue burning. The prevailing ZT drills (with tines) can sow a crop in standing (\"anchored\") rice stubbles but tend to rake loose residues. This is particularly an issue in combine harvested fields with irregularly spread loose straw, leading farmers to adhere to the residueburning practice. Further adaptations to cropresidue-management practices and/or the drill could alleviate the perceived need to burn loose residues.From the point of view of conservation agriculture there is a need to maintain some crop residue cover on the soil surface and to move beyond ZT being applied to the wheat crop only. The environmental and soil implications of ZT wheat for the rice-wheat system as a whole remain short-lived (i.e., seasonal) as long as the subsequent rice crop remains intensively tilled and puddled. ZT can be a stepping stone to conservation agriculture -but this implies changes to the way rice is grown, managing crop residues so as to maintain some soil cover and enhancing crop rotation.The rice-wheat belt is of extreme strategic importance for national food security in both India and Pakistan. Options to enhance national wheat production through increasing area are severely limited, thereby making the enhancement of wheat competitiveness in this belt imperative. The Haryana study highlights the relatively minor net revenues derived from wheat cultivation which underscores the need for continued yield enhancement and cost savings to maintain wheat competitiveness. It also highlights the relative significance of the ZT-induced income enhancement, which boosts returns well above breakeven. However, there is no room for complacency. Extending the ZT area will enhance the competitiveness of wheat, but this needs to be complemented by varietal renewal (e.g., more diverse and stem-rust resistant wheat varieties; non-puddled rice varieties), other resource-conserving technologies (e.g., for rice; laser leveling) and diversification of rice-wheat systems. Furthermore, the advent of the virulent new stem rust for wheat (UG99, Mackenzie 2007;Raloff 2005) and global warming (Ortiz et al. 2006) could have far-reaching consequences across the IGP. In Punjab, late establishment of wheat remains a structural problem in these systems and ZT has the potential to alleviate this. The Punjab study did find significant cost savings, but did not find any significant ZTinduced yield effect, largely a reflection of the lack of a ZT-induced planting date effect. More emphasis should be placed on highlighting the enhanced timeliness aspect of ZT, which would further boost the returns to adopting ZT and alleviate yield concerns. In the end, the sheer size of the rice-wheat system implies even small gains add up to a significant regional impact.The two country studies confirmed widespread adoption of ZT wheat in the rice-wheat systems of Haryana (34.5% of surveyed households) and Punjab (19%). The combination of a significant \"yield effect\" and \"cost-saving effect\" makes adoption worthwhile and is the main driver behind the rapid spread and widespread acceptance of ZT in Haryana. In Punjab, adoption is driven by the significant ZT-induced cost savings for wheat cultivation. Thus, the prime driver for ZT adoption is monetary gain in both sites, not water savings or natural resources conservation. Water savings are only a potential added benefit.ZT adoption for wheat accelerated from insignificant levels from 2000 onwards in both sites. Geographic penetration of ZT is far from uniform suggesting the potential for further diffusion, particularly in Haryana. Diffusion seems to have stagnated in the Punjab study area, and further follow-up studies are needed to confirm this. The study also revealed significant disadoption in the survey year: 14 percent in Punjab and 10 percent in Haryana. Better understanding the rationale for dis-adoption merits further scrutiny. Our findings suggest that there is no clear single overarching constraint but that a combination of factors is at play, including technology performance, technology access, seasonal constraints and, particularly in the case of Punjab, the institutional ZT controversy. In terms of technology performance, the relative ZT yield was particularly influential: dis-adopters reporting low ZT yields as a major contributor to farmer disillusionment in Punjab and the lack of a significant yield effect in Haryana. In neither site did the ZT-induced time savings in land preparation translate into timelier establishment, contributing to the general lack of a yield increase. Knowledge blockages, resource constraints and ZT drill cost and availability all contributed to non-adoption. This suggests that there is potential to further enhance access to this technology and thereby its penetration.The study highlights that in both Haryana and Punjab ZT has been primarily adopted by the larger and more productive farmers. The structural differences between the adopters and non-adopters / dis-adopters in terms of resource base, crop management and performance thereby easily confound the assessment of ZT impact across adoption categories. This calls for comparison of the ZT plots and CT plots on adopter farms. Whether this introduces new biases merits further scrutiny.ZT-induced effects primarily apply to the establishment and production costs of the wheat crop. Both the Haryana and Punjab study confirmed significant ZT-induced resource-saving effects in farmers' fields in terms of diesel and tractor time for wheat cultivation. Water savings are however less pronounced than expected from on-farm trial data. It was only in Haryana that there were significant ZT-induced water savings in addition to significant yield enhancement. The higher yield and water savings in Haryana resulted in significantly higher water productivity indicators for ZT wheat. In both sites, there were limited implications for the overall wheat crop management, the subsequent rice crop and the rice-wheat system as a whole. The ZT-induced yield enhancement and cost savings provided the much needed boost to the returns to, and competitiveness of, wheat cultivation in Haryana. In Punjab, ZT has so far been primarily a costsaving technology.There is scope for widely recommending ZT and making it the prevalent practice for wheat cultivation in rice-wheat systems in the IGP. Cost and resource savings alone are robust and significant enough to merit widespread use, more so in view of the recent structural price hikes in energy prices. Enhanced yields are an added benefit, particularly in Haryana.There is scope for more emphatically stressing timeliness of wheat establishment. Late establishment is a major contributor to low wheat productivity in Punjab. ZT has the potential to significantly alleviate untimeliness, but in practice this did not materialize -thereby foregoing a potential benefit. In Haryana, the average planting date shows that a significant share of wheat plots is still established late, which constrains wheat productivity. Here too the potential of ZT to significantly alleviate untimeliness only partially materialized and can be better utilized -both in terms of early establishment after non-basmati rice and timely establishment after basmati rice.There is a need to enhance the accessibility of smallholders to ZT drill service providers. The majority of ZT adopters so far are large farmers who have relied on contracted ZT drill services (60% in Haryana and 74% in Punjab). Such services have much merit, but only when they are timely, reliable and widely accessible. Many of the potential benefits from ZT are easily thwarted by a late or uncertain arrival of the ZT drill or its improper use -calling for well-trained operators and properly maintained ZT drills. Resource constraints, ZT drill cost and limited tractor ownership naturally limit the potential for self-owned ZT drills for smallholders.There is a need to enhance the accessibility of smallholders to ZT knowledge. Penetration of ZT is still uneven both geographically and within communities. Alleviating knowledge blockages can further an equitable access to this promising technology. There is an important role here for agricultural extension, particularly in Pakistan. In Punjab, ZT must be duly projected as one option in the wheat-planting campaign run through the mass media (the radio, TV and printed material) by the Department of Agricultural Extension. There is also particular scope for more field days, farmer exchanges, farmer to farmer extension and a more participatory and farmer-field school approach.There is also a need for additional water saving technologies -particularly to reduce water consumption of the rice component in rice-wheat systems. ZT wheat was found to be water saving in Haryana, but this still seems largely insufficient to address the impending water crisis. Other technological options are needed and laser leveling is promising in this regard (Humphreys et al. 2005;Jat et al. 2006). Research efforts to grow rice with less water need to be strengthened. For instance, more research is needed on aerobic direct-seeded rice in terms of suitable varieties and management of water, weeds, residues and nutrients.To realize ZT's potential as a stepping stone to conservation agriculture there is a need to change the way rice is grown, managing crop residues so as to maintain some soil cover and to enhance crop rotation. This calls for changes in the prevailing ZT equipment design to enable sowing with residue retention. Some such \"second-generation ZT drills\" have recently been developed in the IGP and these merit further testing and adaptation with concerned stakeholders. It also calls for research on how much residue is needed, particularly in view of the prevailing alternative use of crop residues as basal animal feed (Erenstein et al. 2007c).Technological intervention needs to be complemented with policy reform to create an enabling environment for sustainable agriculture that includes crop rotation and promotes economic resource use. This could easily prove more significant, particularly for water savings, but implies addressing some of the more thorny policy issues such as the subsidy and taxation schemes (e.g., flat water charges, underpriced/ free irrigation water, incentive structure geared towards rice and wheat) that currently undermine the sustainability of rice-wheat systems.There is scope for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in impact assessment. The two country studies primarily relied on a household survey which allowed us to quantify and test for significance of observed differences. However, the studies would have benefited from complementary informal surveys to shed more light on understanding, for instance, the reasons for dis-adoption and partial adoption. The two approaches are complementary and can enrich the interpretation and validity of findings. In this respect, a livelihood system and value chain perspective will be useful and should enhance the relevance and equity of research and development (R&D) interventions.Finally, a more objective and synergetic approach to ZT is needed in Punjab. The State Extension Department has long been opposed to ZT because of possible stem-borer issues but these appear to be unfounded. Compared to Haryana, the advent of ZT in Punjab has been severely hampered by the polarization of the R&D field in terms of ZT advocates and ZT opponents, with farmers facing conflicting information and lack of institutional support. The ZT controversy and institutional rivalry have proven counterproductive, wasted scarce resources and stalled ZT diffusion. It is advisable that both camps come to a neutral and modest middle ground. ZT is neither a silver bullet nor a Pandora's box. It is just a valuable technological option that merits promotion as it saves resources and time and reduces costs with no yield penalty.The study also identifies some areas for further empirical research, including:• More rigorous documentation of the water savings of resource-conserving technologies like ZT.• A better understanding of the ZT dis-adoption process -particularly in terms of disentangling the underlying causes. This study generated some insight but could not resolve a number of imponderables. For instance, the site-specific circumstances dis-adopters faced in terms of their access to drill, the quality of the drill, timeliness, quality of soil, the skill of the operator, etc. Participatory approaches could provide useful complementary information.• A better understanding of partial ZT adoption -particularly in terms of the rationale and underlying field selection criteria and the eventual biases this may imply in terms of technology performance.• A better understanding of the adoption and impacts of ZT in the eastern Gangetic Plains. The present study focused on the northwest IGP where ZT diffusion started (Laxmi et al. 2007). However, the northwest IGP is better endowed and has more intensive rice-wheat systems than the eastern plains (Erenstein et al. 2007c;Erenstein et al. 2007b). This calls for a closer scrutiny of the adoption, impacts and implications of ZT now that the uptake of ZT in the eastern plains has started to pick up.• The possible refinement and extrapolation of recommendation domains for technologies like ZT. For instance, anecdotal evidence coming from Pakistan suggests ZT by soil type interactions. Also the implications and potential use of ZT in wheat-cotton systems with low cotton-residue-retention levels and the extrapolation to other systems like the maize-wheat and the rain-fed systems.• More intensive, participatory and timely monitoring of the performance and impact of new technologies like ZT in farmers' fields."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4012633999.json b/main/part_2/4012633999.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..545a3f7b931e23fadec68ef032844285f22c9493 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4012633999.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d38939492d4d13112fac7d2bcd271a13","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/34ecfd86-0365-4d86-a38d-e4e6c9c1062f/retrieve","id":"-457790472"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d9e9ef69-c092-4716-839c-098c5bd08907","content":"Htee Pu village in Nyaung U Township of Mandalay Division was designated as Climate-Smart Village where participatory action research is undertaken to find solutions to the challenges posed by climate change on the lives and livelihoods of local farmers . The International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR) and the Community Development Association (CDA) partnered together to establish a proof-of-concept site for developing adaptation options the Central dry zones.Farmers in Htee Pu village in the Nyaung U township of the dry zone have tailored their farming systems to the low rainfall pattern. This included combining short duration annual crops, raising small and large livestock primarily on crop residues. Offseason there is a reliance on trees, shrubs and farm residues for income, fuel and fodder needs. Nothing is wasted: recycling is practiced by every household.The current farming system in Htee Pu village features groundnut (peanut) prominently, because of its market potential. This relatively new crop has replaced the diversified cropping systems of the past (which featured drought tolerant crops like sorghum, millets, vinyl legume, horse gram and sesame). Other crops currently grown include pigeon pea, green gram and sesame, all grown between June to September. Because of the limited rain and soil moisture content, only one crop can be grown.Farmers regularly recycle crop residues valuing all resources they can access. Farmers know that shredding dry and green sorghum can help improve feed quality for cattle.Local indigenous knowledge helps farmers store peanut seeds for the next season (without spoilage from rancidity).To capture and harvest early rainwater, farmers typically practice early tillage/land preparation. Composted animal manure is applied for fertilization. However, with years of continuous farming, the soils have degraded. Poor soils, low organic matter, and sandy soil with low nutrient content characterize the soils of the region.Without adequate tree cover, these soils are further prone to erosion when it rains. From year to year, soil fertility and crop productivity declines. It is a vicious cycle which perpetuates poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition.There is an urgent need for the regeneration and restoration of these small farms in order to enhance their capacities to adapt to the impacts of climate change in the future.In the past, sorghum was one of the primary crops used for fodder, for feed and for sale. Sorghum was a reliable crop because of its capacity to resist drought. Sorghum is one of the most waterefficient crops and droughttolerant of grown cereals. Sorghum has a new market as high nutrient feed for livestock: it is rich in protein, mineral, vitamin and antioxidants. It was therefore considered as a candidate crop for re-introduction in Htee Pu village as an intercrop with groundnut.The re-introduction of sorghum in Htee Pu CSV included a systematic process for farmers to access varieties that performed well. Available varieties from Nyaung U dry zone agricultural research station were introduced and compared using highly simplified farmer-managed Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS) methods.In the table below is an example of the results of the PVS undertaken on sorghum varieties sourced from the Department of Agricultural Research (DAR) research station for the dry zones.Participatory Varietal Selections (PVS) are simple methods to find out which varieties do well in that locale. Usually, two or three seasons are needed to identify what works best. These farmermanaged adaptation trials were used extensively in the identification of varieties.Bringing back diversification to a farming system is a key element for enhancing resilience of small farms. Adaptation trials are undertaken in close collaboration with the agricultural research stations and with the active participation of farmers. Participatory varietal selections and crop performance trials were undertaken for groundnut, pigeon pea, green grams and sesame. Table below is an example of the results of the PVS undertaken on groundnut varieties sourced from the DAR research station for the dry zone.Farmers in the dry zone value eating protein rich legumes. They expressed interest in seeds of Dolichos Lab Lab or Hyacinth bean, a crop which had been \"lost\" from their farming system. Seeds were sourced from another township. Seeds in the form on mini kits were provided to 50 farmers. The reintroduction of lost crops (the restoration of agrobiodiversity) can be an important component in a resilience building effort. The Lab Lab bean, besides tolerating drought, can serve as cover crop to lower soil temperature and to enhance soil fertility biomass. Dolichos is nutrient dense, a high protein crop that stores well for long periods.Pigeon pea is another high protein crop and drought tolerant cultivated legume (due to its deep rooting habit).Farmers were encouraged to continue to grow this crop. PVS trials were organized for farmers to identify short duration varieties which \"escape\" the late -season drought.50 farmers in 2018 and 2019 received the Nyaung U Shwedingar variety of pigeon pea. Four cans of seeds were provided to each farmer, who tested these using local existing varieties as checks. Farmers chose the shorter duration varieties which escape drought but still provide high yields.Small and large livestock are a form of capital build up for small farmers. To ensure that the landless, marginal farmers and women also have safety nets, CSA programs can include small livestock such as native chickens, pigs and goats. Improved housing, health care management and locally formulated balanced feeds can enhance productivity.In Htee Pu village, the local breed of cattle and the Bagan breed of goats are valued \"assets\". They depend on livestock for tillage, for food, and as source of funds during emergencies. Fortunately, in a typical village in the dry zone the livestock base remains fairly intact. There are worries however, that adverse and extreme weather could prompt distress sales. More feed resources are needed if this rich livestock agrobiodiversity is to be conserved. By featuring its continued use, livestock can be components of resilience building effort.Small livestock provides an opportunity for project implementers to address social inclusion and equity.More than one third of the households in Htee Pu are landless or near landless. As result of seasonal and semi-permanent migration, many households are female headed. To demonstrate the value of better targeting of women, homesteadbased high density fruit tree production and small scale livestock efforts were developed specifically for women.Climate variability, poor crop diversity and an over reliance on market sensitive crops like groundnut and pigeon pea were major challenges in Htee Pu village (and other villages of the central dry zones). Diversification with trees was considered a pathway for reducing risks to climate change.Agroforestry-based diversification allows farmers to gradually adapt to a changing environment by the inclusion of economically valuable trees. The sequential inclusion of trees into annual crop systems proved to be a very popular risk aversion strategy.Trees provide off-season sources of income, food, fodder and fuel.Diversification with trees and crop diversity can increase farmers' adaptive capacities while reducing the risks of market and crop failure.Trees are considered important by both men and women.To support tree-based diversification, IIRR and CDA introduced fruit trees into the existing farming system of Htee Pu village starting with mangoes.Dryland horticulture methods were used to harvest and conserve water (deep dug pits 30 to 50 cm cube), use of farm yard manure, shading with palm leaves, etc.Farmers chose to grow mango trees because of their known tolerance to drought. However, they proposed growing the trees within an intercrop with their regular seasonal crops (i.e. their lands were being converted to agroforestry-based systems). The farmers identified a variety that adapted well locally. For assured markets, the farmers suggested the Seintalone variety of mango. The activity was started with 30 farmers.To support further intensification and diversification, guava, pomegranate and custard apple were included as intercrop between rows of mango trees. After the first two years, farmers themselves have started to invest in expansion efforts using their own resources.For intensive agroforestry systems, the spacing used was 15 x 15 feet for mango (big canopy tree) and 5 x 5 feet for custard apple and guava (both are small canopy species that cattle do not eat). Annual crops continue to be grown in the interim period. To permit deep rooting of mango trees, pits of 30 cm cube were devised. Deeper pits encourage deeper roots: pits 30 cm to 50 cm deep help trees resist drought better while promoting water harvesting.Free grazing after the main cropping season is a serious problem in Htee Pu, the resolution of which requires collective action. Among our introduced fruit trees, custard apple was not browsed by animals.To create a micro-climate, non-browsable green manure trees were grown on the farm boundaries.Cassia siamea tree is a common tree of dry zones region, with large biomass production capacities, rapid growth, even during the dry season and with capacity to withstand frequent pruning. Cassia siamea leaves from annual pruning is used to rebuild organic matter levels in the soil.CSA must help build back better: rebuilding our production base in environmentally sound ways including rebuilding the soil capacities.Homestead areas in the dry zone are relatively large. These \"spaces\" are controlled and managed by women. Homestead based climate-smart agriculture include small livestock, vegetables and fruit trees, for both income and nutrition. All IIRR CSV programs in Myanmar include this element. Pig 5 -Native chicken -5 -Sorghum, millet, Trichanthera 10 20 50Homestead production is a major element in an income and nutrition diversification effort. Women members from the landless sector, marginal farmers, poor families and women-headed households receive special attention. Preferential targeting helps make CSA socially inclusive. To make such intervention nutrition sensitive, vegetables, fruit trees and small livestock such as goat, pig and native chicken are prioritized. Native breeds are prioritized because of their climate hardy nature.There are challenges ensuring food security in the dry zone, but surprisingly households continue to value the need for dietary diversity.Htee Pu village, in spite of being in the dry zone, has a relatively surprising dietary diversity score, likely because of the nature of their farming system. The agro-biodiverse rich landscapes of the dry zones must be preserved by continuing to feature them in climate-smart agriculture programming.Smallholders farmer produce for consumption and sale, thus serving multiple objectives. The following chart presents data from Htee Puu.Building community capacities, strengthening local food systems, relying on the existent resources base and recognizing the need for being gender and social inclusiveness sensitive are elements of success. Participatory research processes and local learning groups can help local communities take charge of the process of local adaptation. The final direction a CSV takes is ultimately determined by how these empowered communities drive these processes.CSA programs should demonstrate a social inclusiveness angle, a preference for the poor and vulnerable households, for those who were left behind by mainstream research and development efforts.Targeting of poor families, including womenheaded households is prioritized. The risk of elite capture is reduced if household data serves as basis for targeting.Community-based adaptation efforts are well underway in Htee Puu. There is no turning back now: the communities are motivated and moving the process along.In this final year of the IDRC, CCAFS and DAR associated project, the focus will be on expansion of the number of households being reached via the distribution of planting materials, community learning and the tracking of social, nutritional and climate change outcomes."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4016265534.json b/main/part_2/4016265534.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45fc6fb0d15ac7aecee70f1ac268e04ba51b341b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4016265534.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"72c7852c6d8bee4d099a1c692acd0abf","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/89951c87-855c-4a30-aee9-71cef6a08931/content","id":"886806416"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2e1d230e-565b-4acf-9d67-627ee42315d5","content":"The draft genome sequence of an agriculturally important actinobacterial species Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 was developed and characterized in this study. Amycolatopsis BCA-696 is known for its biocontrol properties against charcoal rot and also for plant growth-promotion (PGP) in several crop species. The next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based draft genome of Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 comprised of ~ 9.05 Mb linear chromosome with 68.75% GC content. In total, 8716 protein-coding sequences and 61 RNA-coding sequences were predicted in the genome. This newly developed genome sequence has been also characterized for biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) and biosynthetic pathways. Furthermore, we have also reported that the Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 produces the glycopeptide antibiotic vancomycin that inhibits the growth of pathogenic gram-positive bacteria. A comparative analysis of the BCA-696 genome with publicly available closely related genomes of 14 strains of Amycolatopsis has also been conducted. The comparative analysis has identified a total of 4733 core and 466 unique orthologous genes present in the BCA-696 genome The unique genes present in BCA-696 was enriched with antibiotic biosynthesis and resistance functions. Genome assembly of the BCA-696 has also provided genes involved in key pathways related to PGP and biocontrol traits such as siderophores, chitinase, and cellulase production.The relationships of microbes with plants have been of diverse types, among which plant growth promotion (PGP) activities of microbes is one of the beneficial types to the plants. Beyond the lab or field-level characterizations of the PGP traits, there have been several recent studies where genomic approaches were used for the characterization of plant growth-promoting traits in rhizosphere bacteria. Some of the PGP traits studied include siderophores and indole acetic acid (IAA) production, anti-fungal properties, mineral solubilization, nitrogen fixation, activity of enzymes such as ACC deaminase, lipase, chitinase and cellulase [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . Our group also reported draft genomes of sixteen PGP strains of Streptomyces and predicted genes underlying important PGP or biocontrol traits 14 . A typical approach used by these studies involves the decoding of genome sequence followed by identification of unique genomic islands, prediction of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGC), comparison of BGCs as well as metabolic pathways across genomes, etc.In order to obtain the draft genome of this strain, sequencing was done using two types of libraries, i.e., pairedend (PE) and mate-pair (MP), yielding ~ 9.9 million PE reads of size 100 bases and ~ 6.2 million MP reads of size 250 bases, respectively, with approximate coverage of > 500× (assuming ~ 9.5 Mb as median assembly size of Amycolatopsis genomes available at NCBI).The pre-processed reads were assembled de novo, initially generating 112 contigs, which were further ordered to obtain a single linear scaffolded genome sequence (Table 1, Supplementary Table S1). The genome sequence was of length 9,059,528 bp with GC content of 68.75% and a very nominal number of anonymous nucleotides (total size: ~ 6.5 Kb) (Fig. 1).To assess the completeness of the draft assembly, a reference set of 356 \"Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs\" (BUSCOs) derived from 948 genomes from class actinobacteria lineage was created, and 355 (98.9%) BUSCOs were present in the Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 assembly. Out of the 355 BUSCOs identified, Table 1. General features of the Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 genome assembly. all of them were complete and just three of them were duplicated. Only one BUSCO was fragmented, indicating a high degree of completeness of the generated assembly.The annotation of the genome assembly provided a total of 8,716 protein-encoding genes (PEGs), with an average length of 939.02 bp, occupying 90.34% of the genome (Table 1). The genome also contained 61 RNA coding regions, 213 repeat regions, 42 CRISPR repeats, 40 CRISPR spacer, and 2 CRISPR array regions. Out of 61 RNAs, the number of rRNA and tRNA genes were 6 and 55, respectively (Table 1). Among the predicted PEGs, 5289 (60.66%) proteins were assigned with functions and 3427 (39.30%) were hypothetical proteins. The cofactors, vitamins, prosthetic groups, and pigments (344 genes) found to be the most abundant subsystem class, followed by amino acids and derivatives (247 genes), fatty acids, lipids, and isoprenoids (241 genes), stress response, defense, and virulence (208 genes), protein synthesis (204 genes), energy and precursor metabolites generation (167 genes), cell cycle, cell division, and death (117 genes), respiration (113 genes), and membrane transport (77 genes), etc. (Fig. 2).In order to infer the genomic similarity or variation among the Amycolatopsis species, a pan-genome analysis was conducted. A pan-genome, comprising all genomes of the Amycolatopsis genus with a scaffold or higher level assembly (n = 76) demonstrated huge diversity in terms of gene composition: out of a whopping 375,299 orthologous groups, core genes were a much smaller set (< 1%) compared to the cloud genes (> 95%) (Supplementary Fig. S1). Since our focus was on genomic regions unique to Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696, a subset comprising this genome and the genomes of fourteen closely related species/strains, all from a single clade within the pan-genome-based tree, were re-analyzed. A total of 35,318 orthologous gene clusters could be divided into a core genome of 3,627 (41.6%) orthologous gene clusters, having more than 99% similarity present across all fifteen strains, and the unique genes which ranged from 654 (in A. keratiniphila) to 2557 genes (in Amycolatopsis coloradensis) (Supplementary Fig. S2). The genome of Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 has 1423 (16.3%) strain-specific genes. Since as many as 1/6th (n = 1423) of total genes were reported as unique, this required a rigorous evaluation by using an algorithm that establishes orthology very accurately. Orthology search using Orthofinder pipeline 24 reported a core set of 4,733 (42.6%) genes and 466 (4.2%) unique genes in Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 genome (Fig. 3). Out of these 466 unique genes, only 53 genes could be functionally annotated(by RAST pipeline 25 and Reciprocal Best Blast) (Supplementary Table S2). Among these 53 unique genes, one gene (Genbank ID: WYW18527.1) has been found to be involved in the biosynthesis of Bialaphos antibiotic (carboxyvinyl-carboxyphosphonate phosphorylase). Previously this antibiotic was reported only in Streptomyces species, possessing bactericidal, fungicidal, and herbicidal properties 26 . Other 2), 3rd layer shows an average read depth in a 5 kb window along the genome, 4th layer shows GC skew (positive values in blue and negative values in brown color), 5th layer shows rRNAs (blue bands), tRNAs (red bands), and CRISPR spacers (black bands), and 6th layer shows similar repeats on the genome connected by lines (generated using Circos V.0.69.8).unique genes included drug antiporters, multiple transporter proteins, genes conferring resistance to antibiotic chloramphenicol and streptomycin, and endonucleases.To establish the taxonomic positioning of BCA-696 within the Amycolatopsis genus, we used methods based on the overall genome relatedness index, which showed that Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 genome was closer to the genomes of A. lurida strains than any other Amycolatopsis genomes (Fig. 4). But the bootstrap value for the branch leading to BCA-696 was poor (~ 50 out of 100) showing the uncertainty in the position of BCA-696. Since the previous taxonomic assignment of this strain was based on 16S rRNA sequence, the availability of draft genome information of the strain has positioned it in the phylogenetic tree equidistant to A. lurida and A. roodepoortensis without being closer to either of them, suggesting this strain might be a new species. The number of core genes, shared by all of them, is shown in the center of the flower plot, and the unique genes for each strain are as flower petals (generated using rstudio using plotrix V.3.8-4) (for the list of type strains refer to \"Materials and methods\").In its genome of size ~ 9 Mb, 23 to 35 Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs) were predicted by two widely used BGC predictors (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S3, Supplementary Fig. S3). The commonly observed BGC classes were 'Resistance' , 'Tailoring' , 'Thiotemplated' , 'Type II polyketide' , 'ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide product' (RiPP), 'phosphonate' , etc. Whether any of the genes unique to BCA-696 overlap with these BGCs, a comparison of their genomic coordinates did not show any overlap.A detailed examination of core and additional biosynthetic genes showed two large clusters for the biosynthesis of two antibiotics-vancomycin and enediyne, spread within genomic coordinates 36,435-96,579 S3). A full pathway for vancomycin biosynthesis was observed, however, for the Enediyne family of antibiotics, pathways were observed for the biosynthesis of its core molecule (neocarzinostatin) necessary for further reactions, and one of its derivatives, maduropeptin.The Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 genome assembly was analyzed to identify the genes involved in PGP and biocontrol activities. The strain under this study was experimentally validated to produce metabolites such as siderophores and hydrocyanic acid and shows enzymatic activity for cellulase, chitinase, lipase, indole acetic acid, and 1,3-beta-glucanase 16 .Among the siderophores, evidence for the presence of complete biosynthetic pathways for the production of catecholate or mixed types siderophores namely, bacillibactin, enterochelin, mycobactin, etc., were examined in the genome annotation of Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696. In the RAST annotation, while the enzymes for biosynthesis of siderophore precursors and transporters involved in the export/import of siderophore or Fe-siderophore complex were found (Supplementary Table S4), the genes for biosynthesis of these siderophores from their precursors were largely missing in the (RAST) annotation. Orthology-based search only showed the presence of partial pathways (Supplementary Table S5, Supplementary Fig. S4).Coming to the biocontrol traits, presence of three key cellulolytic enzymes was observed in Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 assembly: Endoglucanase (EC 3.2.1.4), Beta-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21), and Cellulose-1,4-betacellobiosidase (EC 3.2.1.91; Exoglucanase), wherein the former-two were present in many copies, ranging up to nine (Supplementary Fig. S5, Supplementary Table S6). Regarding the Chitinase activity, all enzymes related to the Chitin degradation pathway were also identified in Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 assembly which are: chitinase (EC 3.2.1.14), beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, chitin deacetylase, chitosanase, exo-1,4-beta-d-glucosaminidase (Supplementary Fig. S6, Supplementary Table S7). Like other hydrolytic enzymes, bacterial lipases also play an important role in biocontrol against many phytopathogens, and also in inducing plant defence response 27 . Two enzymes namely, lipase (EC 3.1.1.3) and Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.20), were identified in the Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 assembly, indicating the presence/absence of underlying genes (Supplementary Fig. S7, Supplementary Table S8).Examination of biosynthetic genes/enzymes for auxin (IAA) showed the presence of the pathway involving the Tryptamine intermediate. For alternate pathways (for auxin biosynthesis), although a few genes were also present, ultimately the pathways were incomplete (Supplementary Table S9, Supplementary Fig. S8).First genome assembly of an agriculturally important species from the Amycolatopsis genus: Amycolatopsis genus is well documented for its antibiotic-producing traits 28,29 and thus is an obvious focal point for drug discovery programs. To understand the genomic basis behind this(i.e., secondary metabolite production), 150 Amycolatopsis genomes have so far been sequenced (based on data accessed in mid-2023) and about one-fifth of them are either complete or at the chromosome level assembly. The importance of Amycolatopsis in the agricultural sector is, however, not well known. Perhaps, we were the first to report its usefulness as PGP in sorghum and chickpea 15 , and its antagonistic potential against M. phaseolina mediated charcoal rot disease in sorghum 16 . Along a similar line, to uncover the genomic components underlying the PGP/biocontrol traits, we reported chromosome-level genome assembly of BCA-696 strain: ~ 9.06 Mb in size with 8,716 protein-coding genes (Fig. 1, Table 1).The taxonomic classification of the BCA-696 strain has been available only till the genus level. The analysis using the whole genome sequence showed that this strain is closer to A. lurida (Fig. 4). However, the poor bootstrap value for the branch of BCA-696 implied that the species-level classification of BCA-696 is still elusive with the existing genomic information.The Amycolatopsis genomes, in particular the BGCs, have been compared in multiple studies 22,29,30 . A comparison involving 41 genomes showed a core set of size 1212 genes 29 , which was almost one-third of the size observed in this study (n = 4733), and the difference can be attributed mainly to the different number of genomes involved (41 versus 15). Given the diversity in the biosynthetic potential of secondary metabolites among Amycolatopsis species, the accessory and unique (gene) sets attain a higher importance than the core set. While comparing the Gene Cluster Families (GCFs) in 41 genomes, the conserved features accounted for only a small proportion, and a vast number of GCFs (67%) were represented by a single genome 29 . In the BCA-696 strain, a prediction of unique features gave 466 genes (Fig. 3), which corroborates earlier reports of a significant fraction of unique genes present in Amycolatopsis genomes.While the functional annotation of the majority of the unique genes was unavailable, among the annotated genes antibiotic-related functions were the most prominent. It contained the gene for the biosynthesis of Bialaphos antibiotic (Supplementary Table S2), which has not been reported yet among Amycolatopsis species, and just one Streptomyces species has been known to have capability 31,32 . This antibiotic has been reported to have fungicidal and herbicidal roles, thus a potential biocontrol agent. In addition, several antibiotic transporters were also found which may play a role in secretion or defense (Supplementary Table S2). Another peculiar feature was the presence of Chloramphenicol and Streptomycin phosphotransferase which are involved in providing resistance against those antibiotics (Supplementary Table S2).Plant-growth-promoting bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere are known to produce growth hormones such as auxins and siderophores and hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinase, cellulase, and β-1,3-glucanase and help plants to inhibit pathogens either directly or indirectly [33][34][35] . Amycolatopsis BCA-696 has been reported to produce biocontrol and PGP traits including siderophore, HCN, chitinase, protease, cellulase, β-1,3-glucanase, lipase, and IAA under in vitro conditions 15 . The genome sequence analysis indicated that this strain can potentially biosynthesize auxin only through the Tryptamine pathway (Supplementary Table S9) and may need to cooperate with other rhizosphere bacteria for alternate biosynthesis pathways. Moreover, for Cellulase, Lipase, and Chitinase, complete biosynthesis pathways were identified (Supplementary Table S6-S8). Besides, complete or partial biosynthesis pathways for the diverse siderophore molecules were identified along with a number of transporters (Supplementary Tables S3-S5). The presence of biosynthetic genes for the Enediyne family of antibiotics (Supplementary Table S3), which typically act by DNA cleavage 36 , has been an interesting finding in BCA-696, as some of these secondary metabolites have earlier been shown for antifungal activity among diverse plant and animal pathogens 37,38 . Hence, it is concluded that Amycolatopsis BCA-696 potentially produces hydrolytic enzymes or antibiotics that have the potential to inhibit the pathogen M. phaseolina that causes charcoal rot in sorghum.The usefulness of Amycolatopsis BCA-696, for biocontrol of charcoal rot disease in sorghum, has been demonstrated at both greenhouse and field conditions in our previous study 16 . We also reported the tolerance of BCA-696 on a wide range of pH (5-11), temperatures (20-40 °C), NaCl concentrations (0-6%), and fungicides (including Bavistin up to 2500 ppm, Thiram up to 3000 ppm, Benlate up to 4000 ppm, Captan up to 3000 ppm and Ridomil up to 3000 ppm 15 . These traits could help BCA-696 to survive in harsh environments under natural conditions and thus this bioagent can be used in integrated disease management programs. Further, Amycolatopsis BCA-696 needs to be formulated as a bio-inoculant and used for the biocontrol of charcoal rot in other crops. The secondary metabolite(s) responsible for the inhibition of M. phaseolina need to be experimentally characterized. In the absence of a high level of genetic resistance in high-yielding varieties, Amycolatopsis BCA-696 could be effective in controlling charcoal rot disease and related loss in grain and stover quality of sorghum.A strain of Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 (GenBank accession number of 16S ribosomal RNA gene: KM191337), previously reported by us to have the capacity for PGP in sorghum and chickpea 15 and for its antagonistic potential against Macrophomina phaseolina that causes charcoal rot disease in sorghum 16 was selected for the present study.DNA of Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696 was isolated as per the protocols mentioned in Gopalakrishnan et al., 2020 14 . In brief, BCA-696 was inoculated in starch casein broth and incubated for 120 h at 28° C. At the end of incubation, the culture was centrifuged at 10,000g for 10 min at 4 °C and the cells were washed twice with STE buffer (sucrose 0.3 M, Tris/ HCl 25 mM and Na 2 EDTA 25 mM, pH 8.0). The supernatant was discarded but the pellet (1 g) was re-suspended in 8.55 ml STE buffer and 950 µl lysozyme (20 mg/ml STE buffer) and incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. This was followed by the addition of 500 µl of SDS (10%; w/v) and 50 µl of protease (20 mg/ ml) and the mixture was held at 37 °C for one h. At the end of incubation, 1.8 ml of NaCl (5 M) was added with gentle mixing to avoid shearing the DNA, and 1.5 ml of CTAB (10%; w/v) in 0.7 M NaCl (CTAB/NaCl solution) and incubated for 20 min at 65 °C. Once CTAB was added, all the remaining steps were carried out at room temperature. The lysate was extracted twice with an equal volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1; by vol) and centrifuged at 13,000g for 10 min. Finally, the aqueous phase was extracted with chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1, by vol) and transferred to a tube followed by the addition of 600 µl of propan-2-ol and DNA spooled out after 10 min. Alternatively, it was recovered by centrifugation at 12,000g for 10 min. The pellet was washed twice with ethanol (70%; v/v), vacuum dried, and dissolved in 2 ml of TE buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). RNase A (50 mg/ml) was added with incubation at 37 °C for 2 h. The sample was again extracted with phenol as described above. DNA was re-precipitated from the aqueous phase with the addition of 100 µl of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.3) and 600 µl of propan-2-ol. The DNA pellet was washed with ethanol (70%; v/v), dried, and dissolved in TE buffer. The purity of the BCA-696 DNA was checked in the agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified using NanoDrop.About ~ 5 μg high-quality genomic DNA (free from any contaminant and having A260/280 ratio in the range of ~ 1.8 to 2.0 with DNA concentration ≥ 100 ng/μl) was sent to AgriGenome Labs (Kochi, India) for library preparation and next-generation sequencing using the Illumina platform. The Genomic DNA was fragmented, and a paired-end library with insert size 300 bp, and a mate-pair library with insert size 5 Kbp, were prepared.The Whole-genome sequenced paired and mate-pair reads of the bacterial genome were cleaned (by removing adapters, primer sequences, etc.) using Trimmomatic V.0.39 39 . The cleaned reads were de novo assembled using SOAPdenovo V2.04 and SPADES V3.10.1 assemblers 40,41 . Two assemblies were assessed and compared by using QUAST V5.0.2 42 followed by discarding the contigs having < 500 bp length and coverage < 5. The GapCloser V1.0.1 43 was used to close the gaps that emerged during the scaffolding process by the de novo assembler, using the abundant pair relationships of short reads. Further contigs were subjected to Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC V3.6.9) 44 and KmerFinder V3.2 45 search to find the closely related genomes. In order to do reference genome-based reordering of contigs Amycolatopsis albispora, Amycolatopsis keratiniphila, Amycolatopsis japonica, and Amycolatopsis orientalis genome sequences were obtained from NCBI microbial genomes database followed by scaffolding using Multidraft-Based Scaffolder (MEDUSA V1.6) 46 . The resulting scaffolds were subjected to an NCBI BLAST database search to check the contamination and scaffold hits other than the Amycolatopsis genus were discarded. The completeness of the genome assembly was examined using the tool 'Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCOs) V5.1.3 47 . The Circos plot showing the features on the genome (Fig. 1) was generated using Circos V.0.69.8 48 .The annotation of the assembled genome was carried out by Rapid Annotation using the Subsystem Technology (RAST) server (http:// rast. nmpdr. org/ rast. cgi), through the RASTtk pipeline 25 (Accessed on: April 2020). The genome-based phylogenetic relationships between the BCA-696 strain and its closely related species used to reorganize scaffolds were determined using the reference sequence ALignment-based PHYlogeny (REALPHY) builder method 49 (accessed on: April 2020). Figure 2 showing the subsystem classes in BCA-696 was plotted using ggplot2 package 50 from Rstudio.The pangenome analysis was performed using all Amycolatopsis genomes at the NCBI database with at least scaffold level completion (n = 76, Supplementary Table S10) using Roary pipeline v3.13.0 51 . Having observed an unusually small core set size (< 1%) and a whoppingly large cloud gene set size (> 95%), the pan-genome analysis was repeated on a subset of genomes that were closely related to BCA-696. Species/strains belonging to the clade, identified from the pan-genome-based tree, in which BCA-696 was also present were selected as close relatives. This set (of closely related species/strains) was augmented by including a few more species/strains having contiglevel completion. The fourteen close relatives of BCA-696 were: A. orientalis strain B-37 (GCF_000943515.2), A. keratiniphila strain HCCB10007 (GCF_000400635.2), A. regifaucium strain GY080 T (GCF_001558125.2), A. coloradensis strain DSM 44225 T (GCF_001953865.1), A. roodepoortensis strain ZEL-1 (GCF_024628825.1), A. alba strain DSM 44262 T (GCF_000384215.1), A. azurea strain DSM 43854 T (GCF_001995215.1), A. decaplanina strain DSM 44594 T (GCF_000342005.1), A. lurida strain DSM 43134 T (GCF_000749465.2), A. japonica strain DSM 44213 T (GCF_000732925.1), A. thailandensis strain JCM 16380 T (GCF_002234405.1), A. umgeniensis strain DSM 45272 T (GCF_014205155.1), A. oliviviridis strain CGMCC 4.7683 (GCF_014654365.1), and A. pittospori strain PIP199 T (GCF_013870525.1) (The type strains are indicated with a \"T\" in superscript). The genome sequences were annotated with the rapid prokaryotic genome annotation tool Prokka V1.14.6 52 and implemented Roary pipeline on input annotation files (in GFF format) with a minimum 95% percentage identity for BLASTp. Core gene sequences were aligned with Multiple Alignments using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT V7.520) 53 , and the CD-HIT V4.7 54 algorithm used to perform clustering was embedded in the Roary pipeline. Further analysis was performed on the gene presence/absence file generated by the Roary analysis.Orthofinder (version 2.5.4) 24 was used with default parameters to find common ortholog groups among BCA-696 and 14 other genomes of Amycolatopsis species taken from the NCBI database (Acessed on: October 2022). Genes unique to BCA-696 were selected and mined for functional details using the KEGG PATHWAY Database (Accessed on: October 2022) 55 (https:// www. genome. jp/ kegg/ pathw ay. html).To obtain taxonomic positioning of Amycolatopsis BCA-696 strain in the Amycolatopsis genus based on the genome sequences, the BCA-696 genome was submitted to the Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS) (accessed on: Jan 2024) 31 , and the ten closest genomes were selected by the TYGS to construct the phylogenetic tree with default setting. The TYGS uses overall genome relatedness index (OGRI) methods (GBDP & dDDH).PRISM4 (accessed on: July 2020) 56 was used to mine BGCs in the BCA-696 genome. It allows the prediction of a BGC's location and provides insights into the putative structure of the encoded secondary metabolite. BGCs were additionally predicted using another tool namely antiSMASH v7.0.0 57 using 'relaxed' strictness level. Since none of the two tools gave precise details of the secondary metabolites actually being synthesized by the core and/or additional biosynthetic genes, protein sequences of these genes were searched in the KEGG ortholog/pathway database using ' Automatic KO assignment and KEGG mapping service' (BlastKOALA). Representative pathways for biosynthesis of Vancomycin and Enediyne from Amycolatopsis keratiniphila, for instance, were accessed at URLs https:// www. genome. jp/ pathw ay/ aoi01 055 and https:// www. kegg. jp/ pathw ay/ aoi01 059, respectively.Further, pathway information of the PGP traits was obtained from the KEGG PATHWAY Database (Accessed on: July 2020) 54 , which provided details of the enzymes involved. In order to find orthologs of these KEGG enzymes in the genome of Amycolatopsis sp. BCA-696, the Reciprocal Best BLAST (RBB) search was performed between the proteomes of Amycolatopsis sp. B-696 and a few reference bacterial species (such as E. coli), already have orthologs (KO) of KEGG enzymes."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4039879734.json b/main/part_2/4039879734.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09d8fea0fa2e513706b8ee7c3653547e818a60b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4039879734.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"20e7de84be212610b7e1b2d1cd5b9b57","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/0805564c-fe0b-4bc9-bc25-35ee0f4de358/retrieve","id":"-852955686"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"12a6397b-ec99-4825-b300-5966a04fa21f","content":"Main objective To determine the most economic fertilizer practices to obtain and maintain high cassava yields in a particular location, and simple but effective options for soil erosion control in smallholder cassava-based cropping systemsCassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) production in Laos is developing rapidly due to the increasing demand for its multiple end-uses in the region. As a result, cassava is changing from a traditional food crop to a cash crop, even for smallholders living in remote upland areas. For farmers growing cassava on sloping lands, one of the main challenges is the high rate of soil erosion, as well as nutrient depletion due to continuous cropping without fertilizers. However, poor farmers are generally not interested in erosion control or sustainability as the effect of these is not readily visible, and most farmers are only interested in maximizing their net income. It is therefore necessary to identify cost-effective fertilization practices as well as farmer-friendly methods of soil erosion control.These and many other experiments indicate that more sustainable crop management practices should emphasize increasing yields by the use of higheryielding varieties, proper fertilization, good weed control, use of good quality planting material, closer plant spacing; and possibly the use of contour hedgerows of grass or leguminous species, well-adapted to the soil and climatic conditions, not-competing with nearby cassava plants, and preferably useful for feeding animals in a cut-and-carry feeding system. Tin Maung Aye and Reinhardt Howeler, CIAT-Bangkok, FCRI, Dept. of Agriculture, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; email: t.aye@cgiar.org; r.howeler@cgiar.org Treatments Dry soil loss (t/ha) 1.Traditional practice: no fertilizer or lime, no hedgerows, 2 stakes/hill, no ridging, 0.9 m x 0.9 m 16.8No ridging, with fertilizers and lime; no hedgerows, 1 stake/hill; 0.9 x 0.9 m 11Intercrop with 2 rows of peanut; with fertilizers and lime; no hedgerows, 1 stake/hill; 0.9 x 0.9 m 8.54. Hedgerow of pineapple; with fertilizers and lime; 1 stake/hill; 0.9 x 0.9 m 10 5.Hedgerow of Paspalum atratum; with fertilizers and lime; 1 stake/hill; 0.9 x 0.9 m 6.6 6.Hedgerow of Tephrosia candida; with fertilizers and lime; 1 stake/hill; 0.9 x 0.9 m 7.47.Hedgerow of vetiver grass (Vietnam); with fertilizers and lime; 1 stake/hill; 0.9 x 0.9 m 8.02 8.Closer plant spacing (0.7 m x 0.7 m); with fertilizers and lime; 1 stake/hill; no hedgerow 8.44Contour ridging, with fertilizers and lime; 1 stake/hill; 0.9 x 0.9 m, no hedgerows 8.1 10. Up-down ridging, with fertilizers and lime; 1 stake/hill; 0.9 x 0.9 m, no hedgerows Effective soil erosion control In the erosion control experiment, the Tephrosia candida and Paspalum atratum contour hedgerows resulted in significantly less soil loss than with vetiver grass or Gliricidia sepium hedgerows (Table 2).The latter two species seem to be not as well adapted to the poor soil and cool climate of this site (Figure 2). "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4068669300.json b/main/part_2/4068669300.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..305852eadc0ef2d49ccbe42a209d4f529803bb0e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4068669300.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"dae9001905b0be00501f9cdb63e7ca7d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/IWMI_Research_Reports/PDF/PUB030/Report30.pdf","id":"1385097329"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"28fefed6-4c93-409f-ad2e-e2ee996eca3c","content":"IWMI's mission is to contribute to food security and poverty eradication by fostering sustainable increases in the productivity of water through better management of irrigation and other water uses in river basins. In serving this mission, IWMI concentrates on the integration of policies, technologies and management systems to achieve workable solutions to real problems-practical, relevant results in the field of irrigation and water resources.The publications in this series cover a wide range of subjects-from computer modeling to experience with water users associations-and vary in content from directly applicable research to more basic studies, on which applied work ultimately depends. Some research reports are narrowly focused, analytical, and detailed empirical studies; others are wide-ranging and synthetic overviews of generic problems.Although most of the reports are published by IWMI staff and their collaborators, we welcome contributions from others. Each report is reviewed internally by IWMI's own staff and Fellows, and by external reviewers. The reports are published and distributed both in hard copy and electronically (http:/ /www. cgiar.org/iimi) and where possible all data and analyses will be available as separate downloadable files. Reports may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgment.The authors: S. A. Prathapar and Asad S. Qureshi are Research Coordinator and Research Engineer (Soil Physics), respectively, at the International Water Management Institute, Pakistan. vIn arid and semiarid regions, large tracks of land developed for irrigation are being abandoned each year due to secondary salinization from saline water tables. During non-monsoon months, the mulchability of the surface layers and the hydraulic properties of the subsurface layers influence the rate of salinization of these lands. During monsoon months, the infiltration rate of the surface layers and the depth to the water table control leaching of the surface layers. Mechanical cultivation of the surface layer will increase the mulchability, break the continuity of micro pores between the surface and subsurface layers, and increase the infiltration rate of the surface layer. These changes to the soil physical properties will minimize the rate of salinization and assist reclamation of these saline soils.In this respect, the effect of surface cultivation, monsoon rains, depth to water table, and groundwater salinity on secondary salinization are evaluated using a numerical model, SWAP93 (Van Dam et al. 1997). The simulations were performed for three water table regimes (i.e., 0.5 m, 1 m, and 1.5 m). The surface cultivation was done before the monsoon. The results show that with a water table at 1 m or below, abandoned saline soils can be reclaimed by pre-monsoon surface cultivation within a few years. The rate of reclamation is largely independent of the groundwater quality. Continuous pre-monsoon cultivation will prevent re-salinization of these soils. The rate of reclamation is inadequate if the water table is at 0.5 m. The results of this study can be applicable to parts of the Punjab and Sindh provinces of Pakistan, where large areas are being abandoned due to secondary salinization.In irrigated areas around the world, shallow water tables are becoming an inevitable feature contributing to secondary salinization. Secondary salinization is the result of accelerated redistribution of salts in the soil profile either due to shallow water tables or due to the use of insufficient water to leach the salts. The rate of salinization is high when the water table is shallow and saline. In the Indus Basin of Pakistan, about 4.76 million hectares have a water table within 1.5 m below the soil surface after the monsoon season. Prior to the monsoon, this area is reduced to 1.5 million hectares. Some 1.7 million hectares in the Punjab and 4.5 million hectares in Sindh are underlain by saline groundwater. Due to the presence of these saline water tables, about 40,000 hectares are abandoned within the Indus Basin annually due to secondary salinization. As a result, approximately 6 million hectares are saltaffected, of which about half is in irrigated areas of Pakistan (WAPDA 1989). Another 2 million hectares are estimated to be abandoned due to severe salinity (Bhutta and Wolters 1997). Another estimate is that the land area abandoned due to salinization is approximately equal to the land area developed for irrigation annually around the world. Such lands represent significant investments made during this century.The physical process that contributes to water table-induced secondary salinization is referred to as 'water table evaporation' or 'capillary upflow.' In abandoned bare soils, the rate of capillary upflow is determined by the hydraulic gradient between soil surface and the water tables plus the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil profile. The matric potential at the water table will be zero. In abandoned soils, the soil water content of the surface soil will decrease to its residual water content due to evaporation. Therefore, the lowest matric potential of the surface soil will correspond to the residual soil water content. The gravitational potential between the soil surface and the water table will be equal to the depth to the water table. Consequently, the maximum hydraulic gradient, between the water table and the soil surface will be equal to the residual water content of the soil surface minus the depth to the water table. The soil water content will decrease from saturated volumetric water content at the water table, to a drier value at the soil surface. The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity will decrease accordingly, and will reflect the changes in soil structure as well as the water content. The soil layer with the lowest unsaturated hydraulic conductivity will bind the flow of water from the water table to the soil surface.Bare soils are subjected to a constant meteorologically induced potential evaporation, which is considered to be maximal. Under constant evaporative demand, the bare soil evaporation process can be divided into three stages: the constant rate stage, controlled by potential evaporation demand; the falling rate stage, controlled by the transmission of water Introduction within the soil profile; and the vapor diffusion stage, controlled by the vapor diffusivity of the dried soil surface (Hillel 1975).In shallow water table areas where lands are abandoned and bare, opportunities for constant rate stage evaporation are restricted to short periods, following heavy rainfalls. The soil surface must be close to saturated conditions for the constant rate stage evaporation to occur. Saturated conditions will lead to downward water movement within the soil profile, as well as leaching of salts. This process will counter salinization.During the falling rate stage, the water for bare soil evaporation moves from the water table with dissolved salts. Once the water is lost to the atmosphere, salts are deposited within the root zone, resulting in salinization. The rate of salinization, therefore, depends on the rate at which water moves from the water table, and the extent to which the bare soil acts as a mulch to reduce the potential evaporation. When the actual rate of evaporation is restricted by mulching, the rate of water movement within the soil profile will be restricted to the rate of mulch-limited evaporation. Otherwise, the rate of evaporation will be limited by the rate of water movement as restricted by the hydraulic characteristics of the subsoil.The rate of evaporation during the vapor diffusion stage is controlled by the physical properties of the unsaturated surface layers and the direction of heat flow within the soil profile. In general, heat flow within the soil profile is downwards during daytime. Further, the concentration of vapor in soil pores decreases with an increase in depth, which facilitates downward vapor diffusion. Therefore, under such circumstances, the vapor will not be released to the atmosphere. However, when the direction of heat flow within the soil profile is upwards, and the vapor concentration of atmospheric layers immediately above the soil layers is low, water from the soil profile is lost to the atmosphere. Such losses during the vapor diffusion stage will increase the capillary upflow from the water table. However, the relative increase in capillary upflow due to evaporation during the vapor diffusion stage will be negligible, and will have a minimal effect on the rate of salinization.From the above discussion, the following inferences can be made. Secondary salinization from a shallow water table in arid and semiarid areas can be minimized by Conditions for (a) and (b) can be obtained in the field by mechanically cultivating the soil surface. Mechanical cultivation of abandoned soils can be achieved by plowing. Most farmers in developing countries, such as Pakistan, either own or rent four-wheel tractors to plow the soil. Farmers without access to four-wheel tractors use buffalo-mounted wooden plows to cultivate the soil to a depth of 30 cm. When the soil is plowed and turned over, it will break the continuity of capillary pores from the water table to the soil surface. As the loosened soils settle, some degree of continuity of micro pores will take place. However, this will be less than that of the uncultivated soil. In other words, the complete discontinuity of micro pores will not occur because the soil is made of individual semi-spherical particles, whose settlement cannot be completely prevented due to gravity and mobilization with water. Therefore, the physical processes of the soil water flow will continue to apply to a plowed soil profile. The soil water content of this layer will reduce to its residual water content level at which the rate of capillary upflow will be minimal, preventing salt movement to the surface layers from the subsurface (water table) layers.The total porosity of a cultivated soil is greater than that of an uncultivated soil. This will increase the infiltration rate and the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Hillel 1980;Hall et al. 1993;Benjamin 1993). However, the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of a cultivated soil is lower than that of an uncultivated soil, even at relatively low suctions (Creswell, Smiles, and Williams 1993;Somaratne and Smettem 1993;Murphy et al. 1993). Thus, the rate of capillary upflow in the unsaturated phase in a cultivated soil will be less than that in an uncultivated soil.In summary, in semiarid areas where monsoon rains are restricted to a few months of the year, an annual pre-monsoon mechanical cultivation can be practiced to reclaim abandoned saline soils. Surface cultivation will increase the infiltration rate and decrease the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil. Furthermore, by minimizing the continuity of micro pores within the soil profile, the cultivated soil will act as mulch and reduce the rate of water table evaporation. In combination, these changes to the soil physical environment will increase the rate of leaching and reduce the capillary upflow from water tables. However, since the soil physical properties will be reversed with time due to rainfall and trafficking, periodic cultivation will be necessary.The objective of this report was to test the hypothesis that timely surface cultivation and monsoon, or winter rains in semiarid and arid areas, will assist reclamation of abandoned saline soils. To test the hypothesis, a one-dimensional, vertical, water, and solute transport model, SWAP93 (Van Dam et al. 1997) calibrated by Smets (1996) was used. This report presents a brief description of SWAP93, the methodology adopted to calibrate the model, and the simulation results to evaluate the effectiveness of surface cultivation to reclaim abandoned saline lands in shallow water table areas in view of monsoon rains and groundwater salinity.The SWAP93 model describes a one-dimensional, vertical, unsaturated flow in a heterogeneous soilroot system. The model has the capability to simulate water and solute transport in the unsaturated zone. A brief description of the model is given below.In SWAP93, transient soil water flow is based on Darcy's law and the principles of mass conservation and spatial and temporal continuity. The governing equation is referred to as Richards' equation and one of its forms is:where, h is the pressure head (cm), K(h) is the hydraulic conductivity at pressure h (cm.d -1 ), C(h) is the differential soil moisture capacity (cm -1 ), S(h) is the sink term for water uptake by roots (cm.d -1 ), z is the gravitational potential positive in the upward direction (cm), and t is time (d). The equation is solved by a finite difference scheme as proposed by Haverkamp et al. (1977).The flow within the root zone is strongly nonlinear and is greatly influenced by the water uptake by the roots. Since precise data are rarely available, either on the distribution of the roots as a function of depth or on water uptake, the latter is represented as an extraction or sink term, S(h), distributed over the root zone. Feddes, Kowalik, and Zaradny (1978) described the sink term semiempirically as:where, a(h) is a dimensionless function of pressure head and S max is the maximum possible root extraction rate (d -1 ). The value of a varies between 0 and 1. When it is 1, water extraction by roots is considered as maximum. In this study, S max is defined as proposed by Prasad (1988). It describes S max in the following way:where, T pot is the potential transpiration rate (cm.d-1 ) and z r is the depth of the root zone (cm).The soil profile can be split up into a maximum of five layers with different physical properties. Each layer may contain one or more compartments (finite difference layers). For each soil layer, the soil moisture retention curve h( q ) and the relationship between hydraulic conductivity and pressure head need to be defined. The soil physical relationships can be defined in the tabulated form or in the form of Mualem-Van Genuchten (VGM) parameters (Mualem 1976;Van Genuchten 1980). The volumetric water content q is expressed as a function of the pressure head h with the empirical equation:where, q r is residual volumetric water content (cm 3 .cm -3 ), q s is volumetric water content at saturation (cm -3.cm-3) and a and n are empirical shape parameters. The parameter m is defined as:(5)The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity as a function of pressure head is defined as:where, K S is the saturated hydraulic conductivity (cm.d -1) and l is a pore connectivity factor that expresses the correlation between pores and flow path tortuosity.Evapotranspiration, precipitation, and irrigation describe the top boundary conditions of the soil profile. SWAP93 offers four alternatives for the calculation of daily evapotranspiration: Monteith (1965), Rijtema (1965), Priestly and Taylor (1972), Penman (1948), and Class A Pan. The computed data for ET pot are used to calculate the potential soil evaporation and potential transpiration according to Belmans, Wesseling, and Feddes (1983) as a function of leaf area index.The actual soil evaporation depends on the prevailing conditions in the soil profile. SWAP93 offers two models for reduction in the potential soil evaporation as reported by Black, Gardner, and Thertell (1969) and Boesten and Stroosnijder (1986). In this report, the Boesten model has been used. According to this model, actual soil evaporation (E act ) depends on the sum of potential evaporation (E pot ) since the time of last irrigation or rainfall event.The bottom boundary condition of the system can be defined by three different types of conditions: In SWAP93, solutes are considered as being conservative, which means that exchange processes and chemical reactions do not take place. In case of a transient, one-dimensional, vertical flow in the soil root system, the transport of conservative solutes can be described by the convection-dispersion equation:where, q is the volumetric water content (cm 3 .cm-3 ), D dis is the dispersion coefficient), D dif is the effective diffusion coefficient (cm 2 .d -1), c l is the concentration in the liquid phase (g.cm -3 ), J is the total solute flux (g.cm -2.d -1 ), and q is the water flux (cm.d -1 ). Further details of SWAP93 can be seen in Van Dam et al. (1997).Study Site Smets (1996) calibrated the model using the data from the Chishtian Subdivision, Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia Project, Punjab, Pakistan. The climate of the area is arid and is characterized by long hot summers and cool winters. The mean annual precipitation is about 260 mm. Two-thirds of the precipitation occurs during the monsoon season, between early July and mid-September, in high intensity bursts. One-third occurs from January to March as low intensity frontal rains. The average annual evaporation is about 2,400 mm. Data from a field located in the tail end of the Fordwah Branch canal was used for the model calibration.The sample field is located in the cotton-wheat agro-ecological zone of the Punjab Province. Soil textural analysis shows that the field belongs to the Jhang soil series, which consists of a loamy sand top soil underlain by a sandy subsoil.The calibration period comprised 12 months (from July 1994 to June 1995) covering two growing seasons. The field was extensively monitored during this period. The crop rotation during this period was cotton-wheat. Pressure heads, soil moisture contents, electrical conductivity of the saturation paste (EC e ), irrigation depths, and meteorological data were measured.The top boundary of the soil profile was described by the evapotranspiration, irrigation, and rainfall. Reference ET was calculated by using CROPWAT (Smith 1992), which was converted into ET pot by multiplying with the corresponding crop factors. The reference evapotranspiration was based on the modified Penman method. The depths of all irrigations applied to the monitored field were recorded and used as an input.The daily groundwater table depth was measured with the help of piezometers and was used as a bottom boundary condition. The maximum rooting depth for wheat and cotton was taken as 110 cm and 140 cm, respectively. Measured pressure head values at different depths were used as the initial conditions for water balance calculations, whereas, measured EC e values at different depths were used for salt balance calculations.The soil profile was divided into two layers, and each layer was divided into a number of compartments along the vertical axis. The thickness of each compartment was variable. Where large hydraulic head differences were expected, like at the soil surface, small compartments (4 cm each) were defined. The soil hydraulic properties were described by 6 VGM parameters (q r , q s , K s , a, n, and l). These parameters were taken from the soil series described by Wösten (1987) and were adjusted to match the measured and simulated results. The VGM parameters used for top and bottom layers are given in table 1. The soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves for both layers are shown in figures 1 and 2. VGM-parameters for two layers of the monitored field.Layer Depth q r q s K s a n lNo.(cm) (cm 3 .cm -3 ) (cm 3 .cm -3 ) (cm.d -1 ) (cm The EC e of the soil profile was measured by taking soil samples at depths of 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 200 cm. These samples were analyzed in the laboratory and the EC (electrical conductivity) of the saturation extract was determined. The soil analysis shows that the initial salinity of the soil profile ranged between 1.15dS/m and 1.40 dS/m from a depth of 15 cm to 200 cm. The physical parameters that describe the salt transport in SWAP93 are the dispersivity coefficient, D dis and the diffusion coefficient, D dis (Eq. 7). The model is most sensitive for D dis . Under laminar flow conditions, as in most unsaturated soils, the dispersion coefficient is proportional to the pore water velocity (Bolt 1979).where, L dis is the dispersion length (cm). The size of dispersion length depends on the scale at which the water flux and solute convection averaged. The values of this parameter typically range from 0.5 cm to 2 cm for packed laboratory columns and 5 cm to 20 cm for field-scale experiments (Nielsen, Genuchten, and Bigger 1986). The measured pressure heads and EC e values were compared with the model-simulated results for the model calibration (Smets 1996). Pressure heads were measured in the field by means of tensiometers, installed at depths of 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 200 cm, and were read weekly. Tensiometers were installed in the beginning of rabi 1994-1995. Therefore, only data for 6 months (180 days) were available for comparison. The soil samples for the determination of EC e were collected by boring 10 holes (using an auger) for each depth at different locations in the field. The EC e values were determined twice (on the 141 st and 365 th days) during the calibration period.Figure 3 shows the comparison of measured and simulated pressure heads at 45 cm and 90 cm depths. The results indicate that the measured and simulated values are in good agreement at both depths. For the calibration of solute transport, measured EC e data were compared with the model-simulated results. Figure 4 shows the comparison on the 365 th day. The measured EC e values are presented by rectangles instead of points. The length of each rectangle shows the standard deviation of 10 EC e measurements at each depth. Figure 4 shows that the model slightly underestimated the measured EC e values, although they are still within the measured ranges.It is evident from the graph that there are large deviations in the measured EC e values at the same depth within a field. This is possibly due to the variability of soil hydraulic parameters within the field and uneven distribution of irrigation water over the field. The farmers usually use the basin/ flooding method of irrigation. This practice produces parts of low and high infiltration that, in turn, result in low and high patches of salinity. Further details of field measurements and salt and water balance analyses can be found in Smets (1996) and Smets et al. (1997). As alluded to in the introduction, mechanically cultivating the soil will increase the mulchability and modify the physical characteristics of the cultivated surface. Surface cultivation will increase the macro porosity and saturated hydraulic conductivity and break the continuity between micro pores within the soil profile. An increase in macro pore hydraulic conductivity will improve the potential for downward leaching and the discontinuity of micro pores will reduce the rate of capillary upflow from the water table that, in turn, will retard salinization.The effectiveness of soil surface cultivation is evaluated by using the calibrated SWAP93 model. As noted earlier, the calibration was carried out by Smets (1996) from the data obtained from a field under wheat and cotton cultivation. Its water balance patterns along the soil profile were characterised by equations ( 2) and ( 3). The values of limiting pressure heads to describe a(h) were adopted from Taylor and Ashcroft (1972). It is assumed that roots grow at a constant rate from the time of sowing until they reach their maximum depth. According to Borg and Grimes (1986), maximum rooting depth for most of the crops is achieved at the physiological maturity of the crop. Once it is achieved, the rooting depth remains constant up to harvesting. Maturity was assumed in the middle of the mid-season stage. The maximum rooting depths (Z r ) for wheat and cotton were assumed to be 1.60 m and 1.10 m, respectively. In other words, it is a fixed value and not a calibrated one. To evaluate the effectiveness of surface cultivation of bare soil on salinization, these parameters were set to zero. Therefore, they had negligible effect on calibrated soil hydraulic parameters.Simulations are performed for three water table depths, i.e., 0.5 m, 1 m, and 1.5 m. The groundwater salinity is taken as 10 dS/m to represent the most severe conditions. In real conditions, the water table will fluctuate with time, unless the field has subsurface drainage. However, by simulating salt and water balances at a static level, an additional insight into the minimum depth required to reclaim abandoned soils can be gained. Under field conditions, subsurface drainage will be required to control water table at, or below, a specified level.The depth of the cultivated layer is taken as 0.3 m to represent field conditions. The surface cultivation is modeled by modifying hydraulic properties of the top 0.3 m soil layer of the profile. The comparison of K(h)-h function before and after cultivating the surface layer is shown in figure 5. The K(h)-h function for cultivated soil is only an assumption. Measured values for this function for cultivated soil are not available. Physical determination of the function is tedious, and often shows a considerable variation with space and time. Since our purpose is to test a concept, rather than being prescriptive, assumed values of K S , a, n, and l are considered appropriate. The K S value of the loosened soil is set at 200 cm. d -1 , so that it will permit infiltration of all rainfall and minimize runoff. The values of a, n, and l are set in such a manner that the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of the loosened soil at a particular suction is less than that of the uncultivated soil. The values of VGM parameters a, n, and l for this layer were taken as 0.028, 2.9, and 7, respectively.The interaction between depth to water table, groundwater salinity, a single monsoon, and premonsoonal surface cultivation was studied, using a one-year simulation.The influence of different water table depths on the soil salinity before the monsoon in To determine the distribution of matric potential for the initial conditions, for different water table depths, the model was run for one year using newly set water table depths and climatic conditions. The resultant matric potentials at different depths at the end of the year were taken as the initial conditions for the simulations made to evaluate the effectiveness of surface cultivation to reclaim abandoned saline soils. Salinity data were not available to describe the initial conditions for the bare soil simulation. However, the EC e values at different depths for the first day of calculations for cropped conditions were available. To determine the initial conditions for the bare soil, the model was run for one year using the available EC e values and considering that the soil is bare. The profile salinity of the last day simulated by the model was then used as an initial condition for the bare soil conditions. Water table = 1.5 m Water table = 1 m Water table = 0.5 m uncultivated soils is shown in figure 6. Figure 7 demonstrates the effect of surface cultivation and monsoon rains on soil salinity at different water table depths. It can be seen that without surface cultivation and with the water table at 0.5 m, the impact of monsoon rains on soil salinity is not very substantial. When the water table is at 1 m or below, the salinity of the upper 0.6 m of the soil profile reduces to 2 dS/m, whereas, the lower part of the profile remains highly saline even after the monsoon. By cultivating the top 0.3 m of the soil before the monsoon season, a considerable decrease in the soil salinity for all water table depths can be obtained. These simulations show that under deeper water table conditions (> 1 m), a considerable amount of salts can be leached down by cultivating the soil surface before the monsoon. However, the effect of surface cultivation at shallow water table depths (< 0.5 m) is not very significant.The effect of different groundwater qualities on the root zone salinity is shown in figure 8. Figure 9 shows the effect of surface cultivation on soil salinity under different water table salinities. The surface cultivation leaches the salts not only from the top 0.3 m of the profile but also at the lower depths. Figure 9 shows that with surface cultivation, salinity in the top 0.5-0.6 m of the soil profile reduces to 2 dS/m after the monsoon season, irrespective of the groundwater salinity. From these simulations, it is evident that controlling the depth to the water table is more important in salinity control than controlling the quality of the groundwater. Pre-monsoon salinity profile of uncultivated soils at different groundwater salinities (water table at 1m). *Previous results are based on one-year simulations. The process of leaching the salts from the root zone can be reversed in the dry months following the monsoon. To investigate long-term effects of surface cultivation on reclamation of abandoned saline soils, simulations were performed for a period of 10 years, using rainfall and evaporation data between 1980 and 1990. The initial soil salinity was assumed to be 3 dS/m throughout the soil profile for these simulations.Figure 10 shows the pre-monsoon buildup of soil salinity without surface cultivation when the water table is at 0.5 m depth. Without cultivation, soil salinity continues to increase and in 5 years, the surface salinity will reach 10 dS/m, almost equal to the salinity of the groundwater. Simulation also shows that with prolonged periods, the surface salinity may well exceed the groundwater salinity. Figure 11 shows the long-term effect of pre-monsoon surface cultivation at shallow water table depths. It shows that without cultivation, leaching of salts with the monsoon will only be temporary, and permanent improvement in the salinity status of the soil cannot be expected.If the soil surface is cultivated before the monsoon every year, salinity of the soil profile will not reach to the extent that it would without cultivation. However, the reduction in soil salinity is still not sufficient to consider these soils as reclaimed. Figure 11 also shows that with the water table at 0.5 m depth, the influence of monsoon rainfall is seen only in the top 0.2 m of the soil profile. There is no difference in soil salinity below 0.2 m between the cultivated and noncultivated soils. Any improvement obtained in these layers is reversed during dry years (figure 12). The graph shows that under shallow water table conditions, surface salinity will increase sharply during relatively dry years. This means that the effect of surface cultivation is not significant on the soils with shallow water tables. Effect of different EC and surface cultivation on salinity profile after monsoon (water table at 1 m). Long-term effect of surface cultivation on salinity profile after monsoon (water table = 0.5 m, groundwater EC = 10 dS/m). Figure 13 presents the long-term soil salinity profile of uncultivated soils before the monsoon season, when the water table is at 1 m. The graph shows that without treatment, soil salinity will continue to increase. Figure 14 compares the salinity profiles with and without pre-monsoon surface cultivation. The graph shows that without cultivation, salinity of surface layers fluctuates with time, depending on rainfall during the previous and the current years. However, in the long run, no permanent improvement in the soil salinity can be expected. The changes in soil salinity at deeper layers are not significant. Such fluctuations in the soil salinity will not be enough to reclaim the soil and to grow crops satisfactorily. However, by adopting surface cultivation, reclamation of these soils can be achieved. Figure 14 shows that in soil profiles with water tables below 1 m, by cultivating the surface soil every year before the monsoon season, abandoned saline soils can be fully reclaimed in a period of 2-3 years. The most encouraging factor is that once reclamation is achieved and the practice of surface cultivation continues, these soils would not turn into saline soils, even after 10 years. The soils reclaimed by this method can be used for rain-fed agriculture even if good quality irrigation water is not available.The underlying reason for the reclamation of abandoned saline soils by surface cultivation is that the rate of capillary upflow from the water table will be reduced, which will decrease the actual soil evaporation and retard soil salinization. To account for the effect of surface cultivation on cumulative actual soil evaporation and flux through the bottom of the soil profile, it is useful to study the water and salt balances. Table 2 represents the effect of surface cultivation on cumulative soil evaporation and the bottom flux under different water table depths. These data are based on oneyear simulations. Long-term pre-monsoon salinity profile of uncultivated soils (water table = 1m, groundwater EC = 10 dS/m).Long-term effect of surface cultivation on salinity profile after monsoon (water table = 1 m, groundwater = 10 dS/m). From table 2, it can be seen that with the water table at 0.5 m depth, no reduction in actual soil evaporation had occurred even after surface cultivation. The possible reason might be that after cultivating the top 0.3 m of the top layer, and with the water table at 0.5 m, the length of the unsaturated zone is too small to accommodate percolating water. As a result, the soil profile remains wet, and contributes to the actual soil evaporation. However, with the water table at 1 m or below, about 40 percent reduction in soil evaporation can be obtained by surface cultivation.The bottom flux describes the amount of water that needs to be drained to maintain the water table at a specific depth. Due to increased saturated hydraulic conductivity of the cultivated surface layer, the rate of downward flux increases tremendously (-217 mm) when compared to uncultivated soil (-37 mm). This large downward flux actually acts as a driving force to leach the salts downwards. Table 2 also shows that lowering the water table below 1 m has very little effect on soil evaporation and downward flux. This means that a water table below 1 m practically has no benefit for the reclamation of such soils.Long-term effects of surface cultivation on soil salinization are presented in table 3 from which it is evident that with the water table at 0.5 m depth, a negligible amount of salts is leached down even after surface cultivation. Instead, more salts are added to the profile when fields are left untreated for a longer period. The reasons already described for water balance also hold good for this trend, whereas, with the water table at 1 m depth or below, considerable leaching of salts for the first 2 years occurred even without cultivation. The heavy leaching during the first 2 years was mainly due to the generous rains (i.e., 480 mm and 700 mm per year), which were sufficient to leach down heavy amounts of salts. We can call these wet years. However, this trend did not continue over longer periods and the process of desalinization is reversed because 3-10 years were medium to dry years, with rainfall ranging from 200 to 400 mm per year. During these years, the actual soil evaporation was equal, or more, than the rainfall (± 300 mm per year). Under these conditions, atmospheric demand was met by the groundwater contribution, which added more salts to the soil profile. This clearly shows that without any treatment, the process of desalinization will be reversed during relatively dry years and abandoned soils will become increasingly saline. If soil surface is cultivated every year before the monsoon, this does not happen, and after 2 years, almost all salts are washed out of the root zone. Simulations also show that the period of complete reclamation could be 4-5 years for relatively dry years (annual rainfall < 300 mm). The following conclusions can be drawn from the results of the model simulations.1. The salinity of bare surface soils with a shallow water table is higher than that with deeper water tables. Monsoon rains have a minimal impact on soil salinity when water tables are shallow. Under shallow water table conditions, the surface soil salinity will continue to increase and exceed the salinity of groundwater with time.2. Depth to water table influences the rate of salinization of bare soil more than the quality of the groundwater. The rate of salinization is high when groundwater salinity is high. However, the difference between the rates of salinization from groundwater of 4 dS/m, and of 10 dS/m, is insignificant when the water table is at 1 m.3. Pre-monsoon cultivation of surface layers will increase the rate of leaching due to an increase in macro porosity. The rate of reclamation in cultivated soils is similar even if the groundwater quality is different.4. The rate of leaching in cultivated soils is inadequate under shallow water table conditions. However, salinity in cultivated soils is lower than in uncultivated soils even if the water table is shallow.5. In areas where water tables are at or below 1 m, abandoned saline soils can be reclaimed by annual pre-monsoon surface cultivation within 3 years. Continuation of this practice will prevent re-salinization of such soils.The soils of the Indus Basin vary widely, from very fine to coarse texture. On the basis of a textural analysis, these soils are classified into 5 major soil series. The Punjab Province possesses the largest proportion of coarse to moderately coarse soils, followed by the Sindh Province. The extent of these soils in the Punjab and Sindh Provinces is 45-21 percent of the total cultivated area (Ahmad and Chaudhry 1988). The coarse to moderately coarse textured soils fall under the Jhang soil series, for which this study has been conducted.The results of this study are of great importance for the reclamation of abandoned saline soils for the Punjab and Sindh Provinces of Pakistan, where large areas are abandoned due to salinity and poor groundwater qualities. Most farmers usually use animal-driven wooden equipment for cultivation of up to a depth of 0.3 m. Therefore, cultivating the top 0.3 m of the soil to reclaim saline soils without major investment will enjoy wide acceptability among the farming community.Presently, IIMI-Pakistan is conducting a field trial to evaluate the proposed method in collaboration with MONA Reclamation and Experimental Project (MREP), Bhalwal, Punjab, Pakistan."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4086122930.json b/main/part_2/4086122930.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3c697caa702532a197d2bbef874fb6f15fda752 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4086122930.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f72f48f8387b8b6b72bfe39ee90da143","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1610560b-ade2-4647-bce4-60100820169b/retrieve","id":"-352322730"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6a7fb291-0251-4598-a087-07c6e9255396","content":"System level review of genebank costs and operations (GCO) Commissioning Study: Crop Trust -PMU Part II: CGIAR system level reporting Links to the Strategic Results Framework: Sub-IDOs: • Increased conservation and use of genetic resources Is this OICR linked to some SRF 2022/2030 target?: No Description of activity / study: A panel of eight experts and representatives from CGIAR System, Crop Trust and Plant Treaty Secretariat were convened. Six background papers were prepared. A wider consultation was held in partnership with Chatham House. A report with recommendations was shared with CGIAR and Crop Trust."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4087300404.json b/main/part_2/4087300404.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72b1266066235dea1765400a21e8d55cf45faf3b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4087300404.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c0b809caa99768512b9c58269a9a5af0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d6f73010-b4ea-4562-971f-42ceb262d8c8/retrieve","id":"1460144655"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"206099f5-66d0-4c83-8d01-ff78ece9d698","content":"Climate smart agriculture as a means of improving crop production, building adaptation and resilience to climate change in climate-smart landscapes inEthiopia Commissioning Study: RPL CCAFS EA Part II: CGIAR system level reporting Links to the Strategic Results Framework: Sub-IDOs: • Enhanced capacity to deal with climatic risks and extremes (Mitigation and adaptation achieved) Is this OICR linked to some SRF 2022/2030 target?: No Description of activity / study: The study investigates effects of integrated climate-smart landscape management practices on crop production, soil properties and carbon sequestration in climate-smart landscapes of Ethiopia. The CSA practices include watershed management, landscape rehabilitation, cereal and legume rotation and intensification, community forestry, community grazing land development (area closures), forage production and agroforestry."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4090437898.json b/main/part_2/4090437898.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1bb9df37ec091e28ca739686a408bbfb44adc62e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4090437898.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ad39a88b14d4eb357806535ae014f18a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/91907403-a8bc-49fd-b469-f825823028dc/retrieve","id":"1958800265"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"731db6a6-5722-4751-a32c-65f5893975c7","content":"conservation action to reverse, or in many cases even to slow its loss over several decades (Díaz et al., 2020;IPBES, 2019). A recent review of the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)-crafted to envision necessary progress between 2010 and 2020-found that none of the Targets had been met, and only six had been partially achieved (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020).What explains this existential disconnect between success on priority setting, and failure on action? Among the reasons for meager progress is continued disagreement around profits and other benefits gained through the use of biodiversity, including how and with whom these benefits are distributed. While fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the use of genetic resources represents one of the three pillars of the CBD, alongside the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity (Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992), it is clearly the most contentious. Its emphasis arose in part in response to perceived disparities in the distribution and use of plant, animal, bacterial, and other genetic resources, as well as concern over the increasing potential for their privatization (Khoury et al., 2021). As a form of leverage, access to biodiversity has been linked with benefit sharing (forming the commonly-used term \"Access and Benefit Sharing\"[ABS]).Several international treaties ensconce ABS as a key principle. These instruments and the negotiations that led to them are complex. Their varied interpretations and implementation across the world create confusion for practitioners and policy makers alike, including regarding who is subject to their conditions, how ABS can be bilaterally negotiated, and how biodiversity outside of the time-frame of the instruments is governed.Further complicating matters is the potential that information generated through research important to the use of genetic resources, such as genotypic or phenotypic data, may soon come to be subject to ABS conditions alongside the physical genetic resources. The generation, storage, exchange, and use of these data have all advanced rapidly over recent decades, but ABS mechanisms have not kept pace with these changes. A concern has begun to be voiced that without updating ABS mechanisms, the increasing efficiency of this information will diminish the power of frameworks governing only physical biodiversity resources. This has now come to a head, with the CBD, Plant Treaty, and other agreements actively discussing ABS for biodiversity data. These negotiations have been tense over the past 5 years (Rohden & Scholz, 2021;Wynberg et al., 2021). Further critical negotiations will take place at the Rourke (2021) looks at biodiversity data from a \"bioparts\" perspective, based on synthetic biology. Through looking at the \"chassis\" on which an improved variety or a synthetic organism might be built, this article highlights the difficulty of assigning a country of origin to the different biological parts. When distinct \"bioparts\" cannot be assigned an origin, current ABS schemes become untenable. 2021) advocate for a multistakeholder committee on biodiversity data to assess its role in the ABS regime. This committee would be an important step toward representing a range of viewpoints and would be relatively straightforward to assemble. As tense negotiations continue internationally, such a committee may help lower tensions and assist with outreach to diverse communities impacted by these negotiations. 2021) provide an economic argument for \"bounded openness,\" a nuanced alternative concept of a multilateral system for genetic resources and associated information. They argue that bilateral agreements are unlikely to ever generate the shared benefits needed to maintain the international ABS regime. An effective multilateral system, on the other hand, could generate benefit sharing and facilitate increased conservation and access to crop et al., 2018;Sayers et al., 2019), and the spirit of open science behind them (e.g., Molloy, 2011;Woelfle et al., 2011), have in many ways powered the genomics revolution, and have arguably led to fairer and more open access (e.g., Gallagher et al., 2020;Piwowar et al., 2011). Substantial work is certainly still needed to make these resources accessible to all and to build the global capacity to make use of them. But steps taken to limit these data will not only hinder access to useful information but also degrade the value of biodiversity science and its potential to contribute to living in harmony with nature. As this is a topic that will remain of critical importance, we at Plants, People, Planet welcome future submissions on these topics and aim to add to this collection as new works are published to create an evolving resource to benefit the community.digital sequence information, food security, genetic resources, genomics, phenomics"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4091834910.json b/main/part_2/4091834910.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b2d7408b815e11360ed882bec991402ec211ddb --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4091834910.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"075daa2c-b509-482b-8ecb-70d495a80b15","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4094417324.json b/main/part_2/4094417324.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d4d369b7974574c1e931135e03d548b94d07241 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4094417324.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6da95ea5348c1ebbe159453d80e01f1c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4d9c34a3-511a-4cd3-8a86-0d4638b84817/retrieve","id":"1200682764"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"dae8ebe2-ecfc-4a35-b289-7aa2273e64e2","content":"This work was implemented as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), which is carried out with support from CGIAR Fund Donors and through bilateral funding agreements. For details please visit https://ccafs.cgiar.org/donors. The views expressed in this document cannot be taken to reflect the official opinions of these organisations.Climate change adversely affects many aspects of social life. In agricultural production, climate change creates impacts on crop and livestock productivity, farming measures, thereby national food security. Facing the problems that climate change causes, finding out the measures to adapt and mitigate the impacts of climate change is extremely necessary. These measures on the one hand help ensure food security; on the other hand, improve climate change adaptation and resilience. Residential community is the first and foremost affected by climate change impacts that tend to increase apparently over time. For example, the decrease in crop productivity due to impacts of extreme weather events such as storms, floods, droughts, etc. To reduce climate risks, the leveraged synergies in climate-smart villages (CSVs) in implementing and scaling climate-smart agriculture technologies and practices (CSA T&Ps) is crucial to enhance climate change adaptation and resilience. \"Climate-Smart Village\" (CSV) is a new concept, understood as a rural community together applying different measures to adapt and mitigate impacts of climate change. The word \"VILLAGE\" in the CSV term emphasizes the solidarity of all people in the community to implement adaptation and mitigation measures together. In addition, the word \"VILLAGE\" also shows the bottom-up approach of the model, an effective approach to resolve the root of problems when representing the voice of the people. In Vietnam, 03 CSVs have been established for 03 distinctive ecological regions of Vietnam, including Yen Bai province (the northern mountainous region), Ha Tinh (the central region), and Bac Lieu (the Mekong River Delta), which is within the framework of the CCAFS (Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security) program in Southeast Asia in the 2015-2018. In accordance with the global CCAFS program, these 03 CSVs aimed to address 03 important issues: (i) climate change adaptation; (ii) climate change mitigation and (iii) increasing productivity and people's incomes.In Yen Bai province, the 1 st CSV was introduced and piloted in Ma village, Vinh Kien commune, Yen Binh district (agroecology 1) in the 2015-2018 period with the CCAFS funding. The successful implementation of this model has paved the way for the Vietnam National University of Agriculture (VNUA) research team to replicate the model to the two remaining agroecological sub-regions of the province, namely Cau Vai village, Mau Dong commune, Van Yen district (agroecology 2) and Nong Truong village, Thuong Bang La commune, Van Chan district (agroecology 3). The expansion of the CSV initiative in Yen Bai has been jointly funded by the Irish Aid under the Vietnam Ireland Bilateral Education Exchange (VIBE) of the Embassy of Ireland in Hanoi and Vietnam's Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) through the National Target Program on New Rural Development (NTM). These funds have been implemented through two projects: 'NUI Galway -Vietnam National University of Agriculture (VNUA) Vietnam Ireland Bilateral Education Exchange (VIBE) Programme on Climate Resilient Agriculture & Environmentally Sustainable Landscapes' for 2019-2021 and 'Scaling climate-smart villages in Yen Bai province to promote implementation of climatesmart agriculture and One Commune One Product (OCOP) initiative of the National Target Program on New Rural Development' for 2020, respectively. The 03 successfully established CSVs representing all 03 agroecologies have proven the effectiveness of the CSV approach in collecting synergies in rural communities for enhancing adaptative capacity and resilience to climate impacts. And this approach has a good potential for adoption in the implementation of the NTM program in the 2021-2030 Strategy towards improved climate adaptation and mitigation.Given the evidence for applicability of the CSV approach in the NTM program in building capacities for climate adaptation and mitigation, there isn't any guideline document that is officially approved for implementation within the program. Based on the science-based evidence from the joint CSV work in Yen Bai as well as lessons learnt from global experiences, the VNUA team presents detailed guidelines for CSV implementation at the village and community levels. This document consists of 06 implementation steps that are detailed from the systematic review studies of Bui Le Vinh and Vu Thanh Bien (2020) and Bui Le Vinh (2021). These steps are as follows:Step 1: Situation Analysis -Needs Assessment (SANA)Step 2: Social MobilizationStep 3: Design -PlanningStep 4: ImplementationStep 5: ScalingThere are two main parts in each step: (i) General concepts and (ii) Implementation procedure.ABOUT THE AUTHORS 1. Mr./Dr. Bui Le Vinh is a lecturer and researcher at the Department of Land Administration, Faculty of Land Management of Vietnam National University of Agriculture (VNUA) and research consultant at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Dr. Bui Le Vinh was the research coordinator of the CCAFS FP2.1 project at CIAT during 2015-2018 and has been leader of the VIBE 2018.05 (2019-2021) and NTM (2020) projects in Yen Bai province.1. Climate-Smart Village (CSV): is a community that applies different measures for adaptation and mitigation of climate impacts for maintaining livelihoods 1 2. Climate-Smart Agriculture Technologies and Practices (CSA T&Ps): are measures to adapt to and mitigate impacts of climate risks to maintain productivity and incomes of farmers and the overall agricultural development. Agriculture is considered 'smart' only when achieve three CSA pillars of adaptation, mitigation and food security 2 .The adjustment of a natural or human system to respond to the actual or future impacts of the climate thereby reducing harm or taking advantage of benefits (IPCC, 2001). 4. Mitigation: Technical changes and alternatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 5. Livelihoods: are the combination of human resources and abilities combined with the decisions and activities they take to earn a living and to achieve their goals and aspirations. 6. Theory of change: a comprehensive description and illustration of how and why a desired change is expected to happen in a particular context based on interventions that are designed for the change. 7. Indigenous knowledge: is knowledge that has been developed and maintained for a long time based on interactions between people and natural environment. 8. Climate Change: \"is the change of climate and related components including oceans, soil, Earth's surface, and glacial atmosphere such as temperature rise, melting ice, and sea level rise. In the past, climate change took place for a long time due to the impact of natural conditions, however recently, climate change is caused by the impact of human activities such as the use of fossil fuels in transportation and industrial production, emitting greenhouse gases (eg. CO2)\" 3 . 9. Greenhouse gases: are gases capable of absorbing long-wave (infrared) radiation reflected from the Earth's surface when illuminated by sunlight, then scattering heat back to the Earth, causing greenhouse effects. The main greenhouse gases include: water vapor, CO2, CH4, N2O, O3, and CFCs. 10. Transect walk: is a tool used to learn about local features, applied in many fields, eg. soil science, social sciences. In the establishment of the CSV model, this tool is used to (1) know the types of land uses; (2) understand the socio-economic-environmental context; and (3) understand local resource distribution. The overall goal of the CSV approach is to provide the foundation for participatory research and development activities to promote the practice of adaptation, mitigation, and food security measures and, crucially, ensure reference and demonstration for scaling. In the context of increasing climate change impacts, choosing a right adaptive model for sustainable agricultural development is an issue that is of concern to many parties including policy makers, scientists and farmers. According to Khatri-Chhetri et al., 2017, many technological solutions in agricultural production have been introduced to help increase crop yields, improve income, increase the efficiency of input resources (eg., fertilizers, labor effectiveness), and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These are CSA T&Ps. Under the CCAFS program CSA T&Ps need to achieve three goals: (i) Enhancing adaptive capacity (Adaptation); and (ii) Mitigation or elimination of greenhouse gas emissions (Migitation); and (iii) Sustainable growth in output and income (Productivity) (FAO, 2013). Around the world, there are many CSA T&Ps suitable for each geographic region and climate context.Through empirical studies, CSA implementation and scaling is quite site-specific, but can be commonly achieved by using the CSV approach. In Southeast Asia, the CCAFS program has worked in four countries including Laos, Cambodia, Philippines and Vietnam. In Vietnam, 03 CCAFS-funded CSVs have been established for northern Vietnam (Ma CSV in Yen Bai province), central Vietnam (My Loi CSV in Ha Tinh province) and the Mekong River Delta (Tra Hat CSV in Bac Lieu province). Two more CSVs in Yen Bai province have been established under the joint funding mechanism between the Irish Aid and the government of Vietnam. The set of 03 CSVs in Yen Bai are expected to result in good recommendations for adoption of the CSV approach in improving the implementation of the NTM program in the 2021-2030 Strategy.Potential of the CSV approach in helping Vietnam's rural areas achieve the 02 new titles of 'advanced' and 'demonstration' NTM communes that are socio-economically and environmentally sustainable.In Vietnam, the National Target Program on New Rural Development (NTM) program, launched in 2010, has been implemented to improve agricultural production and rural livelihoods in all 9,000 rural communes since 2011. In the 2011-2020 Strategy, the NTM program applied 19 criteria for communes to achieve the NTM title with foci on building infrastructures for various categories, such as education, health care, production, environment, culture, etc. By 2020, 57% of the total communes have achieved the NTM title in accordance with the 19 NTM criteria. However, many climate-vulnerable areas have failed to mitigate and adapt to climate impacts for not having been capacitated for coping with climate impacts. To improve the overall performance, the Program has intended to improve adaptive capacity and resilience to climate change in the 2021-2030 Strategy, which is a good opportunity for CSA and CSV to be adopted into the largest national program for agriculture in Vietnam. As a result, The NTM project \"Development of the model of PBT model to adapt to climate change associated with the development of one product for each commune and contribute to building a new countryside in the period of 2021-2025\" under the management of VNUA has been funded. Inputs from the project are expected to improve the 19 NTM criteria in achieving the 02 new tiles of 'advanced' and 'demonstration' NTM towards climate adaptation and mitigation in the 2021-2030 Strategy (Bui Le Vinh, 2020).\"Approach landscape\" refers to the simultaneous application of many models, tools, methods and approaches in an area (landscape) to achieve three main goals: sustainable economic and social development 4 . In this approach, there is not a \"success\" formula that applies to all regions, but is rather context-specific. The way of thinking about \"landscape approach\" is often about 'heterogeneity' of an area, for example, diversity of land use types, economic sectors, ethnic groups, occupations, etc. Figure 2 shows the spatial distribution of a rural area where there are different types of land use (residential land, forest land, agricultural land, rivers, streams and specialized water surfaces).The main goal of a CSV also goes around the three sustainable pillars like the \"landscape\" approach. Specifically, CSVs are built/replicated in localities with the goals of (i) Ensuring sustainable growth in output and income (Productivity); (ii) Enhancing adaptive capacity to climate change (Adaptation); and (iii) Minimize or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions (Mitigation). CSV needs to be situated in a geographical boundary that carries all representations for a small agroecological area with specific climate risks and typical socio-economic characteristics for the purposes of demonstration and scaling (Bui Le Vinh, 2021).Although the term \"Village\" is used in the phrase \"Climate-Smart Village\", the scale of a CSV is not just \"encapsulated\" within a village 6 boundary. According to Aggarwal et al. (2018), a CSV can include more than one village that fall within the boundary of 10 km 2 . Having a specific size for a CSV can help best control components deployed in a CSV, especially the CSA T&Ps. Selection and prioritization of CSA T&Ps all follow the cyclic principle to help save and rationally use natural resources, in particular, the wastes of a CSA T&P are inputs for another/other T&P/s. Figure 3 shows an example of the reciprocal relationship between CSA T&Ps that was developed for the Ma CSV in Yen Bai. Apparently, the three CSA T&P groups of \"Conservation agriculture\", \"Sustainable land/natural resources use\", and \"Climate-smart rice production\" form up a cyclic relationship. Climate risks are the primary issue to be identified prior to the development of a CSV. Accurate identification of climate risks and their impacts on livelihoods will make the selection and prioritization of CSA T&Ps in the next step more correctly and suitably done. An effective tool for identifying climate risks is the CSA-RA as described in Mwongera et al., 2015. The CSA-RA tool can help implement effectively SANA in a project area for CSV development and scaling. Main CSA-RA tools are presented in Figure 4.The seasonal calendar is used to identify main crops and livestock and their temporal production processes within the CSV boundary. Information is collected for each crop/animal regarding the farming calendar, practices, activities, investment (time, labour, finance), constraints for implementations, and the role of men and women farmers in every activity. Climatic calendars 8 Climate calendars are used to define typical weather types for the geographical boundary of the CSV. Information consists of number of seasons in a year, annual and monthly average temperatures, and months in which people face difficulties in agricultural production due to weather anomalies. The purpose of this tool is to help assess people's perceptions of climate change and local adaptive capacities and needs for improvement.This means determination what extreme climatic patterns have been or are happening over a long period of time (about 30 years or longer) and their impacts to local people who live in the CSV boundary. The purpose of this tool is to give surveyors an overview of natural disasters in the area, how they have changed over time, and their impacts on different aspects of local production and livelihoods.The Veen diagram is used to identify influence of different actors or stakeholders (agencies, organizations and individuals) on local agricultural production and livelihoods. The purpose of this tool is to determine the level of importance of each actor/stakeholder, so that those with positive impacts continue to maintain and progress; whereas, those that have negative impacts need to take measures for improvement.The purpose is to investigate the distribution of natural resources, including soils, crops, water resources, forest, grasslands, etc., within CSV boundary, impacts (climate, 8 See Annex 2 (section2.2) 9 See Annex 2 (section 2.3) 10 See Annex 2 (section 2.5) 11 See Annex 2 (section 2.4)production) on their sustainable use, in-place adaptability to climate change, and needs for measures that can improve the situation. The transect walk (Terminology 10) tool needs to be used with participation of local knowledgeable farmers to check the accuracy of the map that is also contributed by scientific data and information (eg. geology, pedology, hydrology, forestry, etc.).Conduct interviews with village leaders; commune; District; the province about the local economic, social and environmental context. At the village level, it is necessary to learn more about the history of the village, then related to the effects caused by climate change over time. Local departments / offices of agriculture and extension should also participate in the interview to find out the impact of climate change on local agricultural production and available measures (indigenous knowledge) to minimize effects of climate change.Indigenous knowledge is of paramount importance in the process CSV development. The application of indigenous knowledge will strengthen and contribute to increase the sustainability of the CSV. Locally proven adaptive measures should be included in CSV development as a valuable source of local knowledge. A good lesson learnt is presented in the dialog box below:In the 2021-2030 NTM Strategy, the \"One Commune, One Product\" or OCOP initiative has been created and implemented since 2018 in an effort of leveraging markets for NTM commodities through investing more on local specialties that have high market values (in both domestic and international consumption). According to the Decision 490/QD-TTg, one of the main objectives of the OCOP program is to \"improve people's incomes and livelihoods\". Every local commodity needs to undergo a strict and high-standard set of evaluation criteria before being given with an OCOP brand. OCOP aims to help local farmers increase their incomes from their local specialties of high market potentials and demands.Within the framework of the NTM project, the research team investigated the OCOP potential for orange in Van Chan district with inclusion of (i) market information for orange, (ii) market price and production costs, and (iii) distance to potential markets.The resources to be assessed are (i) Human resource, (ii) Land resource, (iii) Infrastructure, and (iv) Financial resource. Resource assessment is also an important basis for identifying suitable CSA T&Ps and essential investments for developing a CSV such as facilities for social mobilization, knowledge sharing and capacity building (loudspeakers, community libraries, information boards, agricultural extension bookcases, etc.), and providing technical support (eg. technical trainings, seeds, animals, equipment) that make the overall investment more most efficient and avoid waste of resources.To identify goals (activity 1.1) and size (activity 1.2) of a CSV, a series of farmer workshops need to be organized. Detailed workshop activities are presented as follows:Workshop activity 1: To present and discuss definitions: climate-smart village (CSV), climatesmart agriculture technologies and practices (CSA T&Ps), and sustainable livelihood development. Workshop participants: representatives from the provincial, district and commune governments and villagers (village head, leaders of farmer organizations, and farmers). Implementation: 3-5 presenters from different research and development organizations, such as the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Vietnam National University of Agriculture (VNUA), and knowledge farmers to discuss the following issues:-The CSV model in NTM implementation towards enhanced climate adaptation and mitigation;-Capacity building in climate adaptation and mitigation for vulnerable and disadvantaged groups and women farmers;-Livelihoods and sustainable livelihood development strategies in the context of climate change;-Other social issues: gender and gender equity.At the end of each workshop, there is a question and answer between experts and participants. Note that during this discussion session, there should be a complete set of recordings (audio and/or video) and note taking for later analysis.A few good examples of successfully established CSVs in Vietnam, for instance the 03 CSVs in Yen Bai or 03 CCAFS CSVs in Vietnam, are selected for making a PPT presentation to share.The presenter needs to be knowledgeable and experienced in the work so information and messages can be effectively delivered. The successful story about the Ma CSV is presented in Annex 1. Q&A session follows after the PPT presentation.This should be done by some champion farmer who has done the CSV work in one of the successfully established CSVs in Vietnam. This is to show real proof of someone who has done the work on the ground and to show the feasibility of replicating the work to other locations.The identification of climate risks in within the CSV boundary (activity 1.3) is done mainly through focus group discussions (FGD). Each FGD consists of 8-10 members for men and women farmers separately. These members must be able to represent the residential community or in other words be diverse in terms of production types, ages, ethnic groups, economic conditions and good knowledge and experience in their village. The project team decides the criteria for group selection and village leaders and local officers recommend farmers for FGDs based on the group selection criteria.Except for expert interviews, the remaining 5 tools (Figure 4) are carried out in the in the CSV. Each tool has 02 FGDs (men and women). In order to initiate the discussion, the project team needs at least 3 people with 3 different roles, including (i) a facilitator for the discussion process; (ii) a note taker and (iii) a photographer for taking photos of and recording the discussions. Depending on the level of understanding and cooperation of the participants, each tool for a group lasts from 1.5 -2 hours. To ensure the most complete and accurate information is gathered, each tool should be deployed within 0.5 day.Tools for group discussions include a whiteboard, markers of different colours; A0 papers, colored papers, duck tapes, a tape recorder, a camera. In addition, coffee, tea, cookies are necessary for breaks.1. What are main crops/livestock and impacts of climate on them? 2. What are major climate anomalies and their impacts on agricultural production? Activity 1.5 is implemented through primary and secondary data collection as follows:1. Secondary data: Information on secondary data is collected from local socioeconomic reports, general information on the local livelihoods within the CSV boundary and of the commune, annual reports on agricultural production, and farmer household economy. Then conduct desk studies to investigate biophysical, socio-economic characteristics as well as advantages and disadvantages for local commodities.2. Primary data: is gathered through farmer interviews on (i) agricultural production and consumption; (ii) economic efficiencies regarding expanded planting area, productivity, yield, profit, marketing to assess the potential for OCOP products.3. Develop value chains for OCOP products.Information is mainly secondary data collected from local administrative levels (commune, district, and province), including: -For each photo, participants will write a short story to see the effects of climate change, production constraints, and propose adaptation and mitigation measures. In areas vulnerable to climate change, the proportion of people who are aware of climate change issues and its effects is not high. This is due to their educational attainment and little or no access to knowledge and information. An effective way to raise awareness of people about climate change impacts and to improve access to knowledge and information is through improved reading which can be achieved by creating and equipping a village-based community library with different book and reading items, book shelf, tables and chairs, a computer system connected to internet, and regulations for operating the library. The dialog box below presents a specific case of a community library in Ma village and its benefits.Detailed steps for operating the community library:-Step 1: Selecting the best location for putting a village-based community library, ideally within the community meeting compound of the village.-Step 2: Equip the library with a book shelf, a computer with a good internet connection, white/black board for training and discussions, a set of tables and chairs for knowledge sharing meetings and trainings, and a list of regulations for operation of the library which is discussed and agreed by all villagers.2.1. Book items can come from project reports, research and development projects/ programs, extension materials from Yen Bai extension center, donation from domestic and international organizations, etc.2.2. Donation from local government and villagers are welcome to complete the library, eg. furniture, books, computer, etc.2.3. Library regulations are fairly and jointly developed and agreed by all villagers.2.4. The information board is used to update information on daily weather forecasts, season calendar, and other useful information.In the CCAFS FP2.1 project, a community library was established within the village meeting hall compound in Ma CSV with different book and reading items, book shelf, tables and chairs, a computer system connected to internet, and regulations for operating the library. The CCAFS SEA and Yen Bai extension center provided with different reading materials that are useful for CSA implementation. This has drawn more people to come, do reading so they can learn different technical guidance from the materials available, and share knowledge and experience in CSA implementation with each other.In many villages, especially in remote areas, loudspeakers are the main means for people to access current news. However, not all villagers can receive information from the loudspeakers if they live too far. Therefore, it's important that the loud speaker system is sufficiently installed so every villager can receive daily updates from it.Contents that broadcast on loudspeaker can include: (i) CSA implementation measures and benefits of CSA T&Ps; (ii) daily weather forecasts; (iii) seasonal calendar; (iv) new production techniques and provided from different sources, eg. the local government, research and development projects. According to Bui Le Vinh (2021), consultation with partners in the design and planning step for CSV development is extremely important. The construction of a CSV includes many components so it requires knowledge in many different fields of expertise, such as social science, soil science, agriculture, biotechnology marketing and value chain, etc. The consultation with partners will help the design and planning for CSV development to be highly effective, avoiding risks in the implementation process. At the same time, stakeholder consultation will also help the accounting for items, such as CSA T&Ps, in CSV implementation more accurately, avoiding waste and loss. According to Aggarwal et al (2018), the partners include international organizations operating in the research field, national research networks, non-governmental organizations, private sector, and farmers. In addition, Bui Le Vinh et al. (2015,2016,2017,2018,2019) argues that consultation with policy makers, agricultural extension organizations and staff and local authorities at all levels plays an important role.As discussed above, implementation of CSA T&Ps is an important component and plays a key role in the development of CSV. Questions are: Do these measures have a direct impacts on (i) food security?, (ii) reduction of greenhouse gases? and (iii) improved local capacity on climate adaptation? \"SEARCH\" is understood as finding out CSA T&Ps that are appropriate to the local context. \"EVALUATION\" means that from the searched CSA T&Ps will be evaluated through a CBA (cost and benefit analysis) tool for further selection. \"PRIORITIZATION\" means that after an evaluation is conducted, a list of the most suitable CSA T&Ps will be retained for implementation.From the work of 3.2, a detailed design and plan for CSV implementation is developed before technical activities are implemented in the field. Besides being good guidance to CSV technical implementation, the design and plan important assist the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation process in the later stage.According to Bui Le Vinh (2021), an important job to help achieve the highest financial efficiency is the calculation of the cost for CSV implementation is not mentioned by many studies. Even the CSV models deployed in 3 regions of Vietnam (northern, central and southern) have not implemented this activity, only calculating the cost and benefit of CSA T&Ps. In addition to financial estimation for the items/components in CSV development, this also involves identifying sources of finance for CSV preparation, mainly from the government, people, and development programs domestically and internationally.Priority setting for CSA T&Ps is conducted through the following steps: Based on the results of the SANA survey, CSA T&Ps are selected by experts (scientists, local professionals) and farmers (based on experience and local knowledge). In addition, one of the most suitable documents as a basis for selecting and prioritizing CSA T&Ps is the book \"CSA: CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE PRACTICE IN VIETNAM\" 13 . The CSV approach can be applied flexibly based on specific conditions and characteristics of an area.After having the initial list of CSA T&Ps, the implementation team move on to assess the three CSA dimensions of food security, adaptation, and mitigation, thereby offering potential for scaling. These indicators are as follows (Table 1). 13 Step 2. Workshop #1 Identification of top CSA options. This workshop is organized to with participation of relevant stakeholders (local farmers, commune leaders and extension workers) to prioritize selected CSA T&Ps. To facilitate the CSA prioritization workshop, each selected CSA T&P is presented in an easy-to-understand A0 poster as the example in Figure 9. A shorter list of CSA T&P is finalized for the CBA work.Step 3. Calculation of costs and benefits of top CSA T&Ps.Economic analysis is an essential component to evaluate an agricultural measure, before it is done (ex-ante) or after it has been completed (ex-post). Ex-ante analysis includes measuring the historical return of current practices to predict future payoff outcomes; whereas, ex-post is designed to investigate future impacts of new measures implemented. The main purpose of this step is to identify the most viable CSA T&Ps for CSV site. The costbenefit comparison of existing operations and CSA T&P is provided to support the prioritization process. Household characteristics are determined to estimate the probability of success of CSA T&Ps and the percentage of farmers likely to adopt. To conduct CBA, use a semi-structured questionnaire to collect data on farmer yields, production input variables (farm size, labor use, fertilizer, seed cost, chemical substances, transportation costs, harvest costs, amortization and rental). Additional information collected consists of data on the socio-economic characteristics of farmers (age, education level, farming experience, household size, resettlement, sex and marital status). The willingness of farmers to change their land use status for one of the short-term practices is also taken into account. In addition, additional information on SWOT analysis for CSA T&Ps should be obtained through in-depth interviews with key informants (village chief, leaders of women union, farmer union, and youth union).After data collection, data are qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed using different statistical techniques. The Net Present Value (NPV) is calculated using the formula below:In which: Rt -Net cash inflow-outflows during a single year t, Ct -Cost during a single year t, t -Year and i -Discount rate or return that could be earned in alternative investments.When the NPV estimate is positive, the investment in land use is considered beneficial. When it is estimated that the net present value is less than or equal to zero, the investment is not profitable, and the landowner should therefore convert his or her investment to another land use.Several ex-ante estimates have been detected for CSA T&P which were not performed at the time of the study. Estimated differences in productivity, revenue, input costs, and net profit estimates for products were calculated from field trials, expert opinion, document reviews and secondary data.Step 4. Workshop #2 Portfolio development.The workshop aims to discuss the results of the prioritized T&P CSAs with a wide range of stakeholders from province, district, commune and village, and local and research institutions.The roles of the partners in the project are identified to strengthen their ownership to the project. This is considered as one of the results of the project if it is implemented well.Activities within the CSV boundary are carried out through interest groups (IGs), in which each IG takes on a specific task (Vernooy and Bouroncle, 2019; Ogada et al, 2020). These IGs include CSA T&P groups, a social mobilization group, a communication group, and a training group (including key members of the above groups) for scaling (Bui Le Vinh et al., 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019). These groups all have group leaders and participate in the coordination network for implementation and scaling of the CSV model at the villagecommune-district levels (Bui Le Vinh et al., 2019).The implementation of CSV activities also involves the participation of stakeholders, including local scientists, governance leaders and professionals, collaborative groups and the private sector in product consumption and decision making (Bui Le Vinh et al., 2019) These are also activities of gathering and sharing knowledge and experience (KS). KS activities are conducted right in the implementation phase. Bui Le Vinh et al (2016,2017,2019) gathered people with good experiences in CSV implementation in Ma CSV to participate in technical trainings and knowledge sharing in 03 districts of Cao Bang province and 02 CSVs in Van Yen and Van Chan districts. To achieve best results, social mobilization activities still need to be continued throughout the implementation process in order to maintain motivation for people to directly participate and create confidence for those who have not yet participated. However, there are not many studies emphasizing the necessity of maintaining social mobilization in the implementation process (Bui Le Vinh et al., 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019). The success lessons in Van Yen district (Bui et al., 2020) have shown that social mobilization is a very useful tool and has an important role in determining the success of a local development program, and it is necessary to practice sufficiently and skillfully.The establishment of interest groups is an important component in the process CSV development (Bui Le Vinh, 2015, 2016). The lessons learned from the construction of Ma CSV how that: IG activities increase the efficiency of implementing CSA T&Ps (Bui Le Vinh, 2019). IGs will work on 03 main aspects: (i) Culture: propaganda, social mobilization for building a community with good adaptive capacity; encourage the use of community libraries and agricultural extension bookcases to leverage reading culture and technical skills for production; ensure the regular provision of information on climate risks and develop timely community response measures; (ii) Social: improvement of coordination in the community in joint activities to support building a community of better adaptive capacity; and (iii) Technical: actively organize knowledge sharing sessions and help villagers in practicing CSA T&Ps to adapt to the impacts of climate change and ensure environmental protection and sustainable agricultural ecosystems. within the CSV boundary. There is no limit of participants in this group.-The purposes of this group are to (i) encourage people to use community libraries and agricultural extension bookcases in order to improve their knowledge; ensure the regular provision of climate risk information and the development of timely community response measure; (ii) improve solidarity and group coordination among the community in social activities to support building a community with a spirit of solidarity and high resilience.-In the Socio-Cultural group there needs to be a team leader and a deputy. The team leader and the deputy are responsible for organizing regular group meetings (once a month) and ad-hoc group meetings (when there is an emergency such as a disaster). In addition, if the leader or the deputy is not a village official, it is necessary to collaborate with village officials to capture information and policies related to agriculture to pass on to members of the group.-The agricultural extension bookcase should consist of various types of books, eg. extension, handouts, technical handbooks, field guides, etc.-The Socio-Cultural Group will hold competitions to raise awareness of the impacts of climate change on livelihoods, promote the benefits of CSA T&Ps, thereby bring more participants. Therefore, if members join technical groups, those members should join the Socio-Cultural groups to create spillovers.Interest groups are formed based on voluntary members. Team leaders need to be enthusiastic, dynamic, creative and highly responsible. They work without remuneration and are trusted by the group members.Examples for setting regulations in such groups are as follows:-Not having discriminatory attitude, respecting each other's opinions.-Enthusiastic in group activities.-Harmony, solidarity, mutual help in progress, not causing factions to lose solidarity in the group.-Prohibit any acts of circulating or propagating reactionary publications, materials, unhealthy movies and other prohibited documents in accordance with the law.-No profanity, cursing -Maintain general hygiene and order -Must be responsible for preserving and preserving common property of the group.-All comments to the group's activities must be done seriously in constructive and development ways, not using words that provoke, criticize or offend the status and honor of the any individual or group.On the monthly basis, each group organizes a meeting to exchange, share knowledge, and experience, and discuss to find out effective production measures, thereby, tightening the solidarity among villagers and farmers.During the implementation process, project staff always monitor, evaluate, inspect and supervise implementers to ensure progress and quality of activities. At the same time, regular meetings are organized to resolve problems, provide technical assistance and solutions to implement effectively. Through interest groups, people will have necessary skills to strongly develop economic models, create a favorable production and business environment, and increase the value of goods supplied to the market, therefore, contributing to sustainable poverty reduction.Nhóm nghiên cứu của VNUA, CIAT chia sẻ kinh nghiệm Farmers in the CSV receive learning opportunities by interacting and engaging with champion farmers who have participated and gained knowledge and experiences from testing activities through the so-called farmer-to-farmer knowledge diffusion scheme (FF) (Vernooy and Bouroncle, 2019; Bui et al., 2015Bui et al., , 2016Bui et al., , 2017)). At the commune and district levels, horizontal scaling can be done more effectively and efficiently through local annual development plans and credit programs (LO), which can increase the number of CSVs established and end beneficiaries (Sebastian et al., 2019). In Vietnam, the fact that local development programs are under large national programs, for example the NTM, allows an autonomy for horizontal scaling at the local levels based on results of the SANA work (Bui et al., 2019), i.e. through prioritizing NTM communities for CSV adoption.In the vertical direction, the proven CSV model can be replicated nationwide through national development programs and policies (NA). Scientific proven CSV empirical research achievements under the CCAFS program in the 2011-2020 need to be compiled for policy recommendations of national adoption in many countries (Aggarwal et al., 2018;Vernooy and Bouroncle, 2019;Sebastian et al., 2019;Westermann et al., 2015). The joint long-term research collaboration between VNUA and CIAT (Bui et al., 2015(Bui et al., , 2016(Bui et al., , 2017(Bui et al., , 2018(Bui et al., , 2019) ) has been collecting and compiling evidence of successful CSV out/up-scaling at the provincial level Out/up-scaling pathways need engagement of the private sector (PR) at various scales (eg. small traders, collective groups, cooperatives, companies, factories, and enterprises) in CSA value chain development. Aggarwal et al. (2018), Vernooy and Bouroncle (2019) and Westermann et al. (2015) pointed out the importance of the PR investment in ensuring sustainable CSA value chains. This is well reflected Van Yen success story (Bui et al., 2020) where Van Yen cassava factory subsidized the production by providing agricultural inputs (eg. fertilizers and pesticides) and paid commissions to the district government which was then reinvested in the program. At this stage, SM activities are to promote and increase adoption rates of the CSV approach and CSA T&Ps horizontally (Bui et al., 2019).Monitoring and evaluation is an essential component in all projects. In Vietnam, in 2016, the government of Vietnam issued the Decree No. 131/2006/ND-CP on the issuance of regulations on management and use of Official Development Assistance (ODA). From here on, the concept of \"Monitoring-Evaluation\" (M&E) began to be used officially. Accordingly, 'monitoring' is defined as follows \"Monitoring programs and projects is a regular activity and periodically updating all information related to the implementation of programs and projects; classifying and analyzing information; promptly propose options for decision-making of management levels to ensure programs and projects are implemented on target, on schedule, with quality assurance and within the available resources determined\". Decree 131/2006/ ND-CP also stipulates the assessment, which is \"periodic activity, comprehensive, systematic and objective review of suitability, efficiency, performance, impact and the sustainability of programs or projects to make necessary adjustments and draw lessons learned to apply in the next implementation phase and apply to other programs and projects\". M&E indicators were developed through three main steps, following the guidance of the 2006 Ministry of Planning and Investment's M&E manual, including: Code: 1=hiệu quả kinh tế; 2=thị trường tiêu thụ; 3=đầu tư kỹ thuật; 4=tài chính; 5=quy mô áp dụng; 6=hỗ trợ của địa phương; 7=kinh nghiệm; 8=khác 11. Ông/bà có làm chủ nguồn lực để áp dụng mô hình này không? "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4101154898.json b/main/part_2/4101154898.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03c818bbcc71061073ccdc19da5050ec834099c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4101154898.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6bcc7b7d1487d26dd763877ed5a20730","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3a0a9e7e-cd9d-4f1c-9105-30b06ac3423f/retrieve","id":"1351395252"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b09d2d51-61e7-46f5-8c96-9e3928310f57","content":"PhD students are currently active in the programme, some nearing the end of their first year, others just beginning their studies, on topics as wide ranging as within household economics to genetic diversity of parasites -we'll ensureThe Quarterly Newsletter of the \"Zoonoses in Livestock in Kenya\" Programme Our results suggest that mainly chikungunya virus appears to be actively circulating in western Kenya even in the absence of a de-clared outbreak. We recommend establishment of prevention measures and routine laboratory testing of febrile cases for chikungunya in western Kenya.By Isaac Ngere-Resident, Kenya FELTP.Infections leading to fever are the largest causes of child morbidity and mortality in Africa. Dengue and Chikungunya infections are among viral diseases that cause fever even in traditionally malaria endemic areas. We set out to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Dengue and Chikungunya infections and estimate coinfection with malaria among children aged between 1 and 12 years presenting with fever at Busia County Referral Hospital in Western Kenya.We sampled a cross section of children presenting with fever. We interviewed the parents/guardians of these children and collected blood samples and tested by microscopy for malaria and by conventional PCR for dengue and chikungunya. We found that chikungunya was prevalent amongcariae in all of the zones points to presence of possible transmission foci for Schistosomiasis, Fascioliasis and other foodborne trematodiases. People and animals using water and pasture from these sites in western Kenya are at a risk of contracting these parasitic infections Control of food borne trematode infection should be targeted in all the AEZ's with emphasis placed on the areas that border the lake and those with streams flowing from springs.We found that lymnaeid snails were widely distributed in all the agro-ecological zones (AEZs) we studied, and were the majority snail at low altitudes. Biomphalariae, Bulinus, Oncomelaniae and Melanoides were present in some but not all of the zones. The study found that snails were more abundant in streams originating from springs and swamps near the shores of Lake Victoria. Biomphalariae and Lymnaeid species were found to be infected with trematode cercariae. The B. sudanica species found in the swamps near the lakeshore were infected with both Fasciola gigantica and Schistosoma mansoni pointing to a coexistence of Schistosoma and Fasciola infection at the site. The relative abundance of vector snails was found to be influenced by water pH, water temperature, ambient temperature and vegetation cover.Presence of vector snails and cer- In this study, we sought to identify snail species infected with Trematode cercariae and environmental factors that correlate to their presence. This was undertaken to better understand the underlying biology of these species to better understand the risk of transmission of livestock-and human-infectious trematodes.Freshwater As zoonotic diseases can be transported across landscapes by hosts, understanding the complexities of host-mediated pathogen movement is a priority for zoonotic disease research. For my research, I have been using surveys and GPS trackers to gather data on the movement patterns of people and their livestock. We will be looking at the differences in movement patterns between the wet and dry seasons:the first part of the study took place in July and we anticipate completion in November, 2016.At each selected household, we interview the adults present and ask them questions about places they regularly go to, how they get there and how long they stay. We also ask questions about places they go to less regularly and their activities involving livestock kept by the household.At the end of the interview, we ask the adult who spends the most time looking after the livestock (if they have any) to wear a GPS tracker on a lanyard around their neck for one week which stores their location once a minute. At the same time, if they keep cattle, goats or sheep then one of these animals (usually a cow) is fitted with an identical device attached to a collar. If the household does not keep any livestock, one person is still asked to wear a tracker, so that we can detect differences in movement patterns between people who do keep livestock and those who don't. Once the week is up, we return to the household to collect the devices and download the data. The field lab is located within the county commissioner's compound in Busia town. The lab staffing features a full time laboratory manager and laboratory technicians, all trained and well experienced in human and animal sample preparation, parasitological, microbiological, serological and molecular analysis. Additionally there is an administrative assistant, responsible also for stores management as well as a cleaner.The laboratory also hosts several short term visitorssuch as visiting post-docs , international summer students and students on placement from a diversity of Kenyan institutions (Moi University, University of Nairobi, KEMRI)-The FELTP program was established to strengthen the epidemiology and laboratory management capacity of Kenya to meet the challenges of emerging infectious diseases and other public health problems. The ZooLinK project offers a platform for select FELTP students to conduct their Masters research within the project. There are currently 5 FELTP students working on various projects; including: Camplylobacter in children under 5 years old in Busia, validation of ELISA kits for Brucellosis in Camelids and economic losses due to Echinocicosis in western Kenya."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4104795768.json b/main/part_2/4104795768.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14dda3762c97584883952440b6f40bfc520d496f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4104795768.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"94b810707fc6d4a97c76a7af506ff06b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e16449b3-bedd-49a3-a6e5-ee7f1017c597/retrieve","id":"-475959188"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c4f9173c-2e6c-4492-844d-9f0b828b9b14","content":"nghiên cứu Chăn nuôi Quốc tế (ILRI) 2 Viện Thú y (NIVR)"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4104945649.json b/main/part_2/4104945649.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d2261a76c1538781fe415e1df8866d5771fda1e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4104945649.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"873d8d58a5aac51d6960275ccc36d4fb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/477fa401-ecf8-461b-aff4-63e0d88a1394/retrieve","id":"-1682487001"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"42db109d-0e1e-402e-bd80-2708612fa66a","content":"The West Africa economic space has become more integrated with the work of the West Africa Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). Livestock rearing and trade have benefited from increased regional integration and countries are working in concert to tackle tradelimiting issues such as road harassments, trans-boundary animal diseases, and misaligned livestock policies. This brief identifies and recommends political and legal components that could guide a regional framework for the conservation and sustainable use of endemic ruminant livestock (ERL) in West Africa.Studies show that endemic ruminant livestock such as Ndama cattle and Djallonke sheep and goats are a genetic treasure trove that when fully understood could play a decisive role in development strategies of animal husbandry in humid and sub-humid zones where trypanosomosis due to the tsetse fly makes livestock farming very difficult. Under the Regional Project on Sustainable Management of Endemic Ruminant Livestock (PROGEBE), studies conducted in Guinea, Mali, Senegal, and Gambia have been validated through a participatory consultation involving key stakeholders to better understand the political and legal issues affecting the conservation and sustainable use of these particular breeds of livestock. From the analysis, we identified key points on management of genetic resources, animal health, natural resource management, and trade that could contribute in the development of an effective and more targeted regional livestock policy that takes into account the specificity of the endemic ruminant livestock. Specific recommendations on the conservation and sustainable use of endemic ruminant breeds and their habitats are made as a contribution to the development of a plan of action for livestock.Most countries in the region have developed some form of national action plan on biological diversity. However the focus is on the environment, wildlife and their habitats. Domestic crops and livestock are not perceived to be in danger and the conservation and improvement of local livestock breeds with a clearly defined and validated plan of action is lacking in most countries. For countries that have fully-functional national action plans, significant failures are noted in their implementation. The resulting legal vacuum does not facilitate the decision about whom to involve and how to create a synergy between intervening actors in a way that could help maintain biodiversity. This heightens the threats of certain species and breeds disappearing, including endemic ruminants.The consequences of these breakdowns in the system are uncontrolled breeding schemes, including the introduction of germplasm from foreign stock into local herds, leading to losses of the achievements of previous programs; poor ILRI POLICY BRIEF 16 May 2015 understanding of the genetic profiles of the national herds; and genetic dilution of local herds including endemic ruminant livestock. These difficulties can be corrected at the regional level by aligning regional and national policies to incorporate all genetic resources.The animal health sector is in constant mutation with the privatization of veterinary services, followed by significant changes in animal health legislation, leading to the ratification of animal health accreditation mandates in Mali, Senegal, Burkina Faso and Niger. As a result, the roles of private veterinarians are extended to preventive activities such as conducting vaccination campaigns through contracts with their respective governments, participating in epidemiological surveillance in collaboration with public veterinary services, and, in some cases, signing and delivering sanitary certificates. Difficulties of statutory, regulatory and financial orders have affected the results expected from the privatization of veterinary services, which was once perceived as an alternative for a more efficient provision of veterinary services to smallholders. Indeed, the lack of clarity in the regulatory texts regarding the acquisition and distribution of drugs, dysfunction of veterinary clinics, and conflicts of interest between private and public veterinarians have had adverse effects on livestock health and productivity. This is especially true for endemic ruminants which are often reared in inaccessible areas where investment programs have been historically low. Not all countries in the region are at the same stage regarding the veterinary services that should be transferred to the private sector. Regional entities such as WAEMU could lead a reflection on a tripartite partnership (public, private, and community) that can contribute to the growth of private veterinary entrepreneurship, working in conjunction with a public sector for the benefit of the communities to improve health coverage and optimize investments.The absence of a marketing strategy focused on endemic ruminant is a major obstacle for the promotion of these breeds. The consequences are low consideration for these breeds in national market information systems, lack of financial incentives to motivate producers, and increased risks of genetic dilution resulting from uncontrolled crossbreeding. It is our view that a market information system that disseminates information on price, quality, and volume is a better avenue to help ERL producers as they would be more informed to exploit the particularity of the area where ERL are reared and increases their ability to time their decision to put stock on the market between July and October when Sahelian breeds are generally of poor quality. The regional economic organizations could lead the reflection on how to coordinate market information system across countries that disseminates the necessary information regarding markets and trading routes.The major issues revolve around land access and the laws that govern it, especially around the issues of recognition and registration of customary rights. Inconsistency in legal texts and lack of consensus on customary law are major hindrance. The reasons for these difficulties are manifold and include: negligence of pastoral areas by virtue of their nesting into agricultural and forest space, the limited involvement of livestock keepers in the processes leading to the development of legal texts, and the complexity of customary law that regulates land tenure in some (mostly remote) areas. This results in reductions of grazing space for endemic breeds, land insecurity and conflicts between herders and crop growers. Overcoming these limitations requires a clear definition of what represents a pastoral zone in the law.The process of decentralization and devolution of powers to local authorities is well underway in the region. However local authorities generally experience difficulties exercising their powers. The main reason may be related to inadequate human, institutional and financial resources, for the management of natural resources at local level. This leads to not realizing the full potential that the law provides for in situ conservation of endemic ruminant livestock. The dual legal system characterized by the coexistence of customary and state law is seen as an inclusive way to decide matters related to the management of natural resources at the local level. But the legal status and modalities of developing local agreements are unclear in the eyes of state courts and the public, which is detrimental to their legal effectiveness and sustainability. This lack of a regulatory framework clarifying the legal status of local conventions leads to reduced space for endemic ruminants, causes conflicts between players, and complicates the implementation of local agreements for the exploitation and conservation of natural resources. Recognizing local conventions as part of the legal system in the region could help strengthen the capacity of organizations to promote sustainable institutions and enable them to perform roles assigned to them in the context of the decentralization policy. An important step to harmonize countries' pursuit of local governance related to the conservation and use of natural resource is to develop in each country a law clarifying the legal status and modalities of local agreements in consultation with regional organizations such as ECOWAS and WAEMU. The widespread misunderstanding by most people of the legal texts that regulate access and use of resources is a major constraint in the implementation of a policy that seeks an equitable management and use of natural resources at the local level, especially on animal health, pastoralism, and grazing rights. The organization of campaigns to sensitize all stakeholders on the law using texts translated into national languages can help address the challenges of natural resource management that the misunderstanding of the texts causes.The pastoral charter developed in Mali and Senegal, for instance, recognizes livestock rearing as an economic activity. However, most of its provisions remain unimplemented due to its low diffusion in smallholder environments. Similar observations can be made with respect to transhumance, which is still unregulated, both at the national and regional levels. Positive changes are happening, especially on the development of inter communal agreements and text on land use plans. These changes have the potential to establish an effective program for in situ conservation and securing of endemic ruminant livestock. However, it requires creating the conditions for the effective dissemination of the pastoral charter, strengthening the process of development of legal texts on land acquisition and use, disseminating the texts on transhumance, and making arrangements for the implementation of regional and bilateral agreements on transhumance. A soundly designed legal and policy framework wellunderstood by all stakeholders is paramount to achieve a sustainable management and use of endemic ruminant livestock and their habitats. Recognizing the specificity of these breeds and overcoming their vulnerability is important for their promotion. However it is through a better organization and an improved capacity for advocacy at national and regional levels that livestock keepers in general and ERL producers in particular would be better equipped to face market uncertainties, risks posed by disease outbreaks in the context of privatized veterinary services, and recurrent conflicts over access and use of natural resources."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4107488190.json b/main/part_2/4107488190.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6298fa9724ebd533c88ac936528b82c725a5a55 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4107488190.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"82a18c7fdfc72ddb56d4c9b8ef643ea0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ccd40f47-ec62-40b9-8b33-c5d32c0296e2/retrieve","id":"-1974929015"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"828be1b2-0762-4a8f-bb3f-b03d83903fde","content":"The authors appreciate the extensive input of the advisory group and peer reviewers of this report, in particular Ibrahim Ka (Chargé du foncier rural, Département de l'Agriculture, des Ressources en Eau et de l'Environnement -DAREN, Union Economique et Monetaire Ouest Africaine -UEMOA), as well as Jenny Lopez (Land Governance Adviser, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office -FCDO), Michael Odhiambo (consultant), Eva Hershaw (consultant and lead of International Land Coalition (ILC)'s LANDex), Anna Locke (ODI), Ian Langdown (ODI) and Fiona Flintan (International Livestock Research Institute -ILRI).Criteria for a 'typical' pastoral groupFIgure 1 Map of developed pastoral areas in Burkina FasoTable 1 Total area of potential pastoral space in Burkina Faso by season 12 Responsibilities in defining and modifying rules for access and use of resourcesTable 13 Conflicts encountered within the pastoral group Table 14 The most important characteristics of land tenureTable 15 Classification of the most important characteristics of land tenure that make the tenure system suitable for pastoral group practices Table 16 Classification of the most important characteristics of land tenure whose loss makes it impossible to access and use resources as the pastoral group wantsTable 17 Probability that the community will lose the right to benefit from wet-season community grazing by the overall groupTable 18 Probability that the community will lose the right to benefit from wet-season grazing, according to women 21 Probability that the community will lose the right to move livestock and people to and through the communal pastures, by global group Table 22 Probability that the community will lose the mobility rights of livestock and people to and through the community pastures, according to women Pastoral collective tenure and degrees of tenure security in pastoral systems are not as well understood as tenure and tenure security for settled and individual/household land users. This has important implications for the design of suitable approaches to improve tenure security in such areas, and measuring perceptions of tenure security as a contribution to global land indices.SPARC undertook a series of case studies in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Sudan to understand collective tenure and perceptions of tenure security among rangelands pastoralists. This was done in collaboration with Prindex, a data platform that carries out global surveys on people's perceptions of tenure security. Particular attention was paid in the studies to understanding any differences between men and women.A synthesis document can be found on the SPARC website.Two layers of tenure and tenure security are considered in the study: (1) the group; (2) individuals within the group, understanding that groups are not homogenous.Our study focused on 'perceived' tenure security, i.e. how secure people feel. This recognised that perceived tenure security can be a function of formal (legal) recognition of access and use rights, as well as an individual or group's experiences.Specifically, the study aimed to understand the following:1. How do pastoralist communities and their members access grazing land, what are the terms of that access, and what happens in the case of disputes?2. What aspects of the tenure regime are most important for pastoralist communities and their members?3. What is the perceived tenure security of the group, and members of the group, in terms of continued access to resources through the group?4. What do pastoralist communities perceive to be the main drivers of tenure insecurity?Findings at community level include: a description of the pastoral community and collective land under study; the de facto tenure system at community level; the characteristics of the local tenure system, perceived tenure security and factors that affect community perceptions; and differences for individuals vis-à-vis the collective.The study findings will inform the development of indicators to track tenure security in a pastoral context, as well as better interventions to secure tenure in collective pastoral systems. The next step in the process is a series of consultations to identify the indicators for measuring perceived tenure security at scale, and testing of these.1 Habbanaye is a traditional Fulani solidarity system that consists of building or reconstituting the productive capital of livestock for needy members of a community. Typically, an animal (a female) is temporarily entrusted to the beneficiary and, after one or more reproductive cycles, returned to its owner and the offspring are raised by the beneficiary to provide milk and meat for the household or, in the event of a shock, a source of income to meet the family's needs (USAID NCBA-CLUSA (n.d.) 'Le Habbanaye' (https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00XD2R.pdf)Sociocultural -As in most Sahelian countries, pastoralism in Burkina Faso provides: (1) social prestige;(2) basic support of pastoralist families;(3) accumulation of livestock capital to cope with various risks and hazards; (4) social links and exchanges between members of pastoralist communities (as gifts, dowries, inheritances, loans to families or habbanaye 1 );(5) social relations with other communities, mainly agro-pastoralist, especially during transhumance (reciprocity); and (6) maintenance and transmission of knowledge, both technical and cultural (Wane, 2006).Economic -Livestock plays an important economic role for the state and rural households.It is the third-largest export after cotton and gold and contributes about 30% to export earnings, which is more than 18% of the gross domestic product (GDP) (PNSR, 2018) and 40% of agricultural value added (FAO, 2019). The livestock industry employs more than 87% of working men and women (UNDP, 2015) and provides 39% of rural household cash income (MRA-UNDP, 2011). Cattle alone provide livelihoods for about one million households (FAO, 2019).The dominant traditional extensive transhumant pastoral and sedentary agro-pastoral systems supply nearly 90% of the meat and more than 95% of the milk to the national market (FAO, 2019).Environmental -In general, there are positive correlations between livestock numbers and environmental quality (FAO, 2019). Contrary to popular belief, pastoralism helps maintain rangelands through faeces fertilisation and the dissemination of forest and forage seeds (epizoochory and endozoochory) (Sawadogo, 2011;Boudet, 1978;Daget and Godron,1995;Devineau, 1999). This enriches the flora and repopulates natural areas. Livestock farming also contributes to the valorisation of agricultural and agro-industrial by-products, fallow land and spaces unsuitable for agriculture (Wane, 2006;Nori, 2007). FAO (2019) estimates greenhouse gas emissions due to cattle production at 16.5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) per year.According to the laws governing access, use and management of natural resources in Burkina Faso, particularly the Land and Rural Development Law (RFR), available grazing areas can be categorised into: Using data from the 2012 Land Use Database (IGB, 2014), we identified various land-use units and grouped them into categories (e.g. agro-forestry parks, shrub savannas, grassy savannas, open forests, gallery forests, tree savannas). This allowed us to estimate the potential grazing areas for different seasons (Table 1). Until 2017, Burkina Faso had 28 officially designated functional pastoral zones, which are special management areas defined by the LORP (Figure 1). These collectively cover an estimated 747,496 hectares (ha) (ONF-BF, 2017). Additionally, the country had approximately 161 village and inter-village grazing zones, encompassing an area of around 1,200,000 ha (ONF-BF, 2017). These official pastoral areas were not evenly distributed, with the majority concentrated in the Centre-South (six pastoral areas) and Centre-East (four pastoral areas) regions (ONF-BF, 2017). The extent of potential pastoral rangelands has been decreasing over time. This decline is primarily due to human activities such as agriculture (including frequent clearing of pastures, livestock pathways and transhumance corridors), industrial and artisanal mining and extensive privatisation of rural and peri-urban land, such as in Sissili. While no recent data is available, it was estimated that, in 2004, the loss of pastoral land to agriculture amounted to 3.3% (MRA, 2012). This trend is observable even on the outskirts of specially developed pastoral zones, such as the Sideradougou zone, whose area decreased from 307,000 ha at its establishment in 1988 to approximately 51,500 ha some two decades later (ONF-BF, 2017). Agricultural expansion is the main driver behind the reduction in managed or traditional grazing areas.In the past, resident or transhumant pastoral groups maintained positive relationships with other communities, engaging in complementary activities and exchanging services and goods through reciprocity (Thébaud, 1995;Boutrais, 1999). However, these relationships have deteriorated due to several factors. First, demographic pressure has led farmers to expand their fields at the expense of traditional pastures. Second, the diversification of activities within each community has disrupted complementarity and intensified competition for resource access (Sawadogo, 2011).In absolute terms, these relationships have become increasingly conflictual, varying in intensity across different regions of the country (Illy, 2018). Land conflicts related to these issues have risen significantly, with the Centre-North region topping the list with 182 land conflicts during 2013-2014. In contrast, the Sahel region of Burkina Faso recorded only six land conflicts during the same period. The situation remains volatile, with the East region ranking eighth during the previous period, with 31 land conflicts, but taking the top spot as the most affected region during 2015-2016, with 138 recorded conflicts (Illy, 2018).sparc-knowledge.orgIn the past, certain areas in villages were tacitly agreed upon for animal grazing. The lowlands (Sawadogo, 2011) and floodplain areas, strategic spaces for livestock in the dry season, were little cultivated and animals were left to find fresh grass. Farmers are encroaching on these strategic spaces due to the increased need for land and the inaction of technical services to manage clearing large areas under Article 47 of Law No. 003-2011/AN of the Forestry Code. They are encouraged to do so by development policies that promote these areas for agricultural purposes (rainfed and off-season crops) to the detriment of their pastoral use (Sawadogo, 2011). The precariousness of the land tenure situation for pastoralists has increased with the adoption of land laws, which has led to an increase in land transactions with massive appropriations and the sale of lands previously reserved or open for grazing.Pressure on traditional grazing lands and conflicts has increased due to climate change, including shifting rainfall patterns, shorter rainy seasons and more dry areas. The expansion of agriculture, especially cash crops like cotton, has also reduced available resources such as pasture and water for pastoral communities.Additionally, farming and mining have encroached on grazing areas, livestock routes and animal migration paths. According to reports from the National Land Observatory of Burkina Faso (ONB-BF) in 2017, and the Netherlands Development Organisation (SNV) and Resource Conflict Institute (RECONCILE) in 2020, these factors have contributed to the problem. In 2004, the Ministry of Animal Resources (MRA) estimated that around 3% of pastoral lands were converted to farmland each year, as noted in a 2012 report (MRA, 2012). This situation has led to conflicts, sometimes violent, arising from livestock damaging farmers' crops.The quality and quantity of food available for herders and their animals in natural rangelands have declined for several reasons. These include periods of drought in the 1970s and 1980s, ongoing climate change and human activities that put pressure on these resources. As a result, herders struggle to find enough nourishment for their animals, especially during the dry season. This challenging situation has led to increased transhumance, where herders move their livestock away from their original areas over longer distances and for extended periods. Some herders have even chosen to settle in other places outside their home countries such as Ghana and Togo.Traditionally, pastoralists' access to natural resources such as water and grazing land was based on the multifunctionality of natural resources and the multiple uses of these resources by different user groups over time. Today, due to unfavourable legislative changes (e.g. the Rural Land Tenure Act that encourages privatisation) and the increasing market value of land, indigenous communities are experiencing increased sales of land to wealthy individuals who are establishing farms (SNV and RECONCILE, 2020) that are sometimes left undeveloped.Decentralisation has led to decentralised management of natural resources, with mechanisms such as village development councils, village land commissions and village land conciliation commissions. Pastoralists are poorly or not at all represented and unable to defend their interests (SNV and RECONCILE, 2020).Insecurity affecting people and their property is a significant obstacle to pastoralism and transhumance within the country and in cross-border areas. The natural pastoralist spaces are insecure, which increases their vulnerability and feeds suspicion about pastoralists. This is one reason why pastoralists are deserting these areas in search of more peaceful locations (SNV and RECONCILE, 2020). In an attempt to adapt to the context, pastoralists are moving in larger groups, modifying their routes, minimising transhumance or attempting to settle in more secure coastal countries.In principle, certain laws are supposed to create the conditions for peaceful cross-border mobility (e.g. Decision A/DEC.5/10/98 and Regulation C/REG.3/01/03 at the community level, as well as bilateral agreements such as the Mali-Burkina, 2 Burkina-Niger 3 and Burkina-Côte d'Ivoire 4 agreements) (GIZ, 2019). In practice, these principles have been repeatedly challenged, particularly between Burkina and Benin (with a government order banning cross-border transhumance since 1995, updated in 2019) and between Burkina and Togo (introduction of high taxes by an inter-ministerial order in 2008). This reluctance has been reinforced with the onset of insecurity in these areas, as these states fear that assailants will mix with transhumant herders to gain access to their territories. Despite this reluctance, a large number of pastoralists have moved with their herds to neighbouring countries (Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire, Benin and Togo). Burkina Faso's land tenure system for pastoralism is a complex web of laws governing rural land and pastoral activities. These laws grant herders important rights but need harmonisation to address shortcomings. Land governance involves various levels of government and local structures, while policies aim to promote equitable land access, including for women and youth.Pastoralist land rights within the national domain are governed by various laws related to pastoralism or rural land tenure. The Law on the Orientation of Pastoralism (LORP) is the main law governing pastoral activities in Burkina Faso. It grants important rights to pastoralists, including access to and use of special pastoral areas and the right to share other areas with other natural-resource users, such as farmers. The LORP also establishes additional rights for herders, like access to water, transhumance trails, and a flexible dispute-resolution mechanism, including mandatory preliminary conciliation and, if needed, litigation.The land tenure laws aim to regulate the management of all land within the national land domain, whether owned by the state, local authorities or individuals. These laws primarily include the Agrarian and Land Reorganisation Law and the Rural Land Tenure Law. They provide security for collective land rights through local land charters, specifications and individual land rights such as rural land-use rights (e.g. long leases, land loans, land rentals) or permanent enjoyment rights (e.g. rural land possession certificates, farming permits, land titles). Additionally, there are other laws on decentralisation, forests, water, environment, expropriation and land-use planning. These laws require harmonisation to address existing gaps.Land management operates under a dual system, with customary and modern systems coexisting. In the event of conflicts, the modern system takes precedence. Various entities are responsible for land management, including national ministries, deconcentrated state services and local authorities like communal and regional bodies, rural land services, village land commissions and village land conciliation commissions.The protection of the rights of women and young people concerning land tenure is not specifically outlined in the primary land-tenure laws. However, there is a clear political intent to address this issue. For example, the national policy on land security in rural areas, adopted in 2007, acknowledges the land rights of rural producers and emphasises the need to safeguard and ensure access to land for women, young people and pastoralists.The main law governing pastoral activities in Burkina Faso is the Law on the Orientation of Pastoralism (LORP). Additionally, Article 106 of Law No. 070-2015/AN of 22 October 2015, on the orientation of agro-sylvo-pastoral, fisheries and wildlife activities, mandates the state and local authorities to allocate at least 30% of developed land for these activities to benefit women and youth in the agricultural sector. In the agricultural sector, recent reports indicate that over 60% of developed land has been allocated to youth and women. However, similar data for the pastoral sector is currently unavailable.Law No. 034-2002/AN of 14 November 2002, also known as the LORP, establishes a comprehensive legal framework for pastoral activities. The main provisions are outlined below. Further details are in Annex 1.Access to specially developed pastoral areas -The law allows authorised pastoralists access to designated pastoral zones, regulating access through responsible authorities.Land within these zones can be allocated for individual use based on permits or leases. The state may also grant concessions for specific areas within pastoral zones.Access to reserved grazing land -Pastoralists have the right to freely access areas reserved for animal grazing, but local communities can collaborate with authorities to regulate access through local land charters, ensuring sustainable resource use.Access to open grazing land -Pastoralists can use fallow fields or post-harvest lands, sharing these rights with other rural operators. They can access these areas unless the owner explicitly prohibits it.Access to water -The law grants pastoralists access to water points for their animals, subject to water management laws. Easements of passage are imposed on the land bordering water points.Livestock movement and tracks -Herders have the right to move livestock within the country and internationally, following relevant laws. Specific livestock tracks, including access, transhumance and marketing tracks, are categorised as public domain. The state or local authorities own them.Dispute resolution -The law promotes conciliation as the initial step in settling disputes related to pastoral activities. Disputes must undergo mandatory conciliation within a local commission involving representatives from both farmers and pastoralists. This process aims to resolve conflicts while considering local traditions and practices before resorting to legal proceedings.The overall intent of these laws is to establish a comprehensive legal framework that promotes sustainable development, resource management and protection of land, water and natural resources while ensuring equitable access and safeguarding the rights of various stakeholders, including pastoralists. Burkina Faso recognises two main types of land tenure: customary and modern.Law No. 034-2009/AN is based on local customs and practices. Possession of rural land, validated by a Certificate of Rural Land Tenure, is the foundation of this form of tenure. It must be recorded and formalised to have legal status. Article 6 defines rural land possession as the de facto power legitimately exercised over rural land about local land tenure customs and practices. However, for this practice to be recognised as a source of law, it must be recorded and formalised through an administrative act called a Certificate of Rural Land Tenure.This encompasses formal acts that validate land rights and include land titles, operating permits, provisional and final transfer orders, and other non-permanent titles like long leases. These titles represent rights over rural land. Land tenure security is initiated by individuals or legal entities, involving various administrative processes, and is governed by laws such as the law on agrarian and land reorganisation and the law on rural land tenure. Several types of land titles and permits are relevant to pastoral activities. These include:land titles or title deeds -these are issued by the ministry responsible for domains operating permits -issued by the mayor after reviewing the application with domain services transfer orders -these include provisional and final transfer orders issued by the ministry in charge of domains provisional orders -issued by the mayor Certificate of Rural Land Ownership -also issued by the mayor's office.Additionally, non-permanent titles can be useful for pastoral activities, such as long leases granted by both communes and the state. Land loans and land leases in rural areas are contracts between individuals, as outlined in the law on rural land tenure, and they establish usage rights for their beneficiaries.Securing land tenure must be initiated by interested individuals or legal entities, whether public or private. When it comes to issuing modern property titles, the Ministry of Economy, Finance and Development is responsible for granting land titles. However, other titles, such as the Certificate of Rural Land Ownership, are typically issued by the community (commune) following review by the land registrar and the land registry or by the Rural Land Service or land office, as in the case of the Certificate of Rural Land Possession.Land management in Burkina Faso involves several actors: the state, local authorities and local land management mechanisms.The state operates through central-level actors like the minister in charge of domains and central directorates responsible for land, including the General Directorate of Taxes. At the decentralised level, regional and provincial tax directorates are involved. The Revenue of Domains and Land Registration handles land management.Communes are responsible for land management within rural communes through the Rural Land Service. However, the Bureau Domanial takes on this role in urban communes (including attached villages). In villages, communes establish village land commissions and village land conciliation commissions. Village land commissions manage land, while village land conciliation commissions resolve land conflicts, including those involving farmers and herders.Individuals play a significant role in land management. They are not only members of local land management structures like village land commissions and village land conciliation commissions but can also create local rules for land management, including those related to pastoral resources. Various types of land titles are available, and they are obtained through different processes:The Certificate of Rural Land Ownership is signed and issued by the mayor of the concerned commune, with the file processed by the Rural Land Service.The operating permit file is processed by the Receiver of Lands and Land Registration and is signed by the mayor.The land title file is reviewed by the land registrar and signed by the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Planning.In cases of rural land conflicts, which may involve pastoral activities, the regulations mandate a prior conciliation process (Articles 67 and 96 of Law No. 034-2009/AN of 16 June 2009 on rural land tenure). Conciliation results in either a conciliation report if an agreement is reached or a non-conciliation report if no agreement is reached. If no agreement is reached, the concerned party can take the matter to a civil court with jurisdiction for a legal resolution of the dispute.The traditional pastoral communities are made up primarily of Fulani people and their distribution corresponds to the geographic spread of the Fulani community. Initially, these pastoral groups were found in the Sahel region (Seno, Oudalan, Soum, Yagha), the North (particularly in Northern Yatenga, Thiou and Banh areas), Boucle du Mouhoun (Barani) and in the East (areas bordering Niger). They traditionally moved to the southern, more agriculturally oriented regions during the dry season.Severe droughts in the 1970s and 1980s forced some pastoralists, including entire families and clans to migrate and settle in the southern part of Yatenga and the northern centre (Bam, Sanmatenga and Namentenga). Some settled in state-developed pastoral areas (now totalling 28), aiming to reduce conflicts with farmers, while others integrated traditional village spaces where they shared pastoral resources with host communities. To diversify and adapt, some pastoralists also engaged in agriculture. However, the emergence of terrorism-related insecurity in 2015 led to significant changes in the pastoral landscape.Today, the situation is difficult to determine due to terrorist activity in most forest areas which displaced herders and local farming communities. In Burkina Faso, especially in the north and east, pastoral groups are organised around key figures in the traditional pastoral system known as rugga. These leaders play crucial roles in maintaining clan cohesion and the security of their members and animals. They possess extensive knowledge of the pastoral environment, including seasonal variations, land characteristics, vegetation, water sources and soil conditions. The organisation of transhumance often involves a scout, the Garso, who provides essential information for decision-making.In the present day, particularly in the southern regions, pastoral organisation is less robust, with clan structures breaking down into smaller groups that strive to uphold traditional practices in resource management and community relations. One constant in Burkina Faso's pastoral environment is that land is not privately owned by individuals or communities. It is considered freely accessible. Pastoral groups prioritise meeting their livestock's food needs, regardless of the cost. Land tenure security for pastoralists is more about ensuring access to resources than obtaining formal land titles. The strengths of pastoral groups lie in their solidarity and extensive knowledge of their environment, enabling them to maintain mobility despite resource pressures and deteriorating relationships with other communities.In addition to the traditional pastoral system governed by internal resource access and management rules, management within state-established pastoral zones is quite different. Herding groups, organised into associations, settle there with their families and operate according to rules established by the administration. Furthermore, the appropriation of land for real estate and large-scale agriculture (agribusiness) in village and peri-urban areas is a relatively recent trend gaining momentum.sparc-knowledge.orgPure pastoralism is not common in the South-Central region, specifically in Zoundweogo Province. Initially, this area was primarily agricultural, with a substantial uncultivated section where onchocerciasis (blackfly-transmitted disease) was prevalent. The region's transformation, initiated through development projects following the successful control of onchocerciasis, turned it into a zone for agriculture and pastoral activities. During the 1970s and 1980s droughts in the northern regions (Sahel and North Central), many farmers and herders from those areas relocated to the south, particularly in the Zoundweogo Province (Robert, 2010). This migration was especially notable in areas recently freed from river blindness (onchocerciasis) and sleeping sickness (human trypanosomiasis), such as the Kaibo area (Zampaligré et al., 2019).The government designated six specific pastoral zones in the region to address the rising conflicts due to increasing space pressures. Among these, three are located in Zoundweogo (Sondré-Est, Luili-Nobere and Niassan), and one is a sylvo-pastoral zone (Gogo-Gomboussougou) acting as a buffer between the province and the Parc National Kabore Tambi. In the present situation, pastoral families from the north face three scenarios:1. In response to resource pressure and degradation, some herders have migrated further south, even as far as Ghana, where they have established new settlements.The largest group of herders has found homes in pastoral areas developed by the state.A smaller group of herders, more aligned with the traditional pastoral model and practices, remains in village spaces, especially within the sylvo-pastoral zone (Gogo-Gomboussougou).One notable group in this third category is the Wakilé Allah pastoral group of Tigre, located in the commune of Binde. These herders settled in managed pastoral zones bear responsibility for their areas and have the authorisation to live there, as stipulated in Article 13 of the LORP. Their activities within these zones are subject to regulation by Decree No. 2007-410/PRES/PM/ MRA/MFP, which outlines the general conditions for allocation, occupation and utilisation of developed pastoral zones.Pastoralists who live in collective villages use the same resources as the animals of sedentary communities. They are accommodated by residents who tolerate them, and their animals graze on uncultivated or unused lands and spaces between fields. However, their numbers are small, and some observers question whether this livestock-farming model can endure amidst the increasing land-occupation dynamics (agricultural expansion, land sales for farming and real estate projects) that often disregard the interests of herders.In general, pastoralists who migrate to the region, including those in pastoral areas, settle in clan groups or extended families, with the group leader typically being the eldest or most established individual. Their strengths lie in their internal cohesion within these groups, their efforts to maintain harmonious coexistence with other communities, particularly indigenous ones, and their ability to access and develop resources, even when they are not easily reachable (e.g. night grazing in areas near fields and concessions). However, the current situation poses significant challenges to this system's adaptability due to limited space, growing hostilities from other stakeholders, especially farmers, increased land monetisation and resource depletion through unregulated extraction.Laws governing pastoral land tenure and natural resource management are generally poorly known or completely unfamiliar to the stakeholders, including supervisory agents. Even technical service personnel are often only familiar with texts relevant to their specific areas. Producers, including farmers, herders and pastoralists, are aware of these laws but have only a vague understanding of their content, often being unable to name or describe them. This lack of awareness allows for abuses in the implementation of these laws, with technical services often applying them partially or unfairly. Land access disputes, in particular, tend to disadvantage livestock farmers. There are conflicting opinions regarding the management of conflicts arising from field damage or the use of traditional or vital pastures by animals. Some farmers criticise herders for using their resources to influence agents reporting damage or those responsible for determining penalties.The pastoral group Wakilé Allah represents a typical pastoral group organised into a clan consisting of multiple families. This group is based in the Tigre village, 15 km from Kaibo-Centre and 37 km from Manga.The pastoral group was established in the village during the droughts of the 1970s, which forced many herders to migrate to the southern part of the country. Its members predominantly rely on livestock, particularly pastoral activities, and, to a lesser extent, agriculture. They practise mobility in managing their herds across a vast pastoral area spanning approximately 12,000 ha, which has been allocated by the village chief.This area is also shared with other groups, including farmers cultivating fields. Consequently, the available space is under significant pressure, and mobility, whether large-or smallscale, appears to be an adaptive strategy for the group. This pastoralist group was chosen for the study due to its relevance to traditional land tenure systems and its location, which is relatively unaffected by the insecurity issues experienced elsewhere in Burkina Faso, including Zoundweogo Province. Larger groups exist in more critical areas, such as the Gogo-Gomboussougou sylvo-pastoral zone, which is currently plagued by insecurity.The case study was conducted in the village of Tigre, in the rural commune of Binde (Zoundweogo Province, Centre-South region). Two criteria guided our choice. The first was the favourable security situation, which is good compared to other regions of the country. The second criterion was that the pastoral groups met the criteria of a 'typical' pastoral group operating according to traditional and endogenous rangeland management conventions (Box 1). Based on these two criteria, the Wakilé Allah was identified as a test case for the study.The steps taken to contact the group were: asking the regional directorate in charge of livestock for information, suggestions and contacts for the group telephone exchanges with the contact persons within the group sending two research team members -a research assistant (at the national level) and a livestock technical officer based in the region (identified as a field assistant).The group has well-defined leaders and a clear governance structure (considered more or less formal by the group but has no formal recognition by the government).The group has clear rules and guidelines on when and how far to travel, what routes to take and who travels.The group has good working relationships with the communities in the areas where they travel.The group has a home base that may be shared with other groups, and extensive transhumance takes place from that home base.The area, extent, duration and timing of transhumance will depend on the season. The group will have a clear idea of the place of origin and will also be able to describe their transhumance patterns and mobility.The areas where transhumance is practised are also used by other groups but not exclusively.The group continues to use the land collectively for transhumant and mobile livestock.Livestock remains a central component of their livelihood system.Mobility remains of paramount importance.The study was conducted using documentary research and individual and focus group discussions. The literature review gathered information on pastoralism (actors, events, constraints) at the national and regional levels.The interviews were of two types: (1) interviews with key informants at the national and regional levels to complete and update the information from the literature review; and (2) focus group discussions with representatives of the pastoralist group (mixed groups, specific groups) on various themes. The specific focus group discussions aimed to discover the particularities of individuals within these groups compared to the mixed group.The participants were chosen by considering various criteria so that they would be sufficiently representative of the Wakilé Allah pastoral group: age (old, young), gender (men, women), social commitment (leadership, noncommittal), marital status (married, single, widowed, divorced), level of wealth (rich, poor). A total of 28 people participated in the exchanges, including 3 people for the tool testing and 15 people for the mixed-group focus group discussions (Table 2). Of the 15 people in the mixed group, only 1 person (a man) left two days later for family reasons and did not return.In discussions with specific groups, new people (three women and seven men) joined the exchanges. Two women and two men from the original mixed group joined these new people to form the men's specific group (nine people) and the women's specific group (five people).Researchers interviewing members of the Wakilé Allah group.Image by Issa Sawadogo The research team chose gender, age, marital status, social engagement and wealth as potential criteria for the focus group discussions on the assumption that these might influence a person's standing in relation to land and land tenure. After verification, the criteria of age and marital status were found not relevant because there were no young people (i.e. less than 35 years old) and all participants were married. We therefore set up two groups and defined the classes or subcategories as indicated below. The participants were then divided into subgroups: (A) for social commitment (referring to the individual's involvement in local political issues and community events); and (B) for the level of wealth (defined by the number and type of livestock (cattle, sheep and goats) and having all participants classified into one class or another by a consensus person), as follows: The data collection process was conducted under significant time constraints, sometimes extending beyond 2100 hours. Initially planned for 14 days, the discussions with group members ultimately lasted only 10 days. This period, occurring from December 2022 to February 2023, coincided with the transhumance season, and some herders had already departed for Ghana. Those who remained were in the midst of preparations when contacted. Consequently, the information provided was occasionally unclear. Fortunately, the team reminded them and allowed them time to clarify information from the previous day.Additionally, discussions continued with some team members via phone after the research team had left.Due to transhumance and gold panning, which primarily involve young individuals (15-35 years old), there were hardly any young participants within the pastoral group during our exchanges.The Wakilé Allah consists of about 3,000 members who live mainly from livestock. They also practise agriculture as a sideline. Membership of the group is possible provided that one is a herder and agrees to respect the rules that the group has established. The group is well organised with a governance structure that includes a president (diandé passiba), an assistant to the president (diandé oumarou), an information officer (bikienga salif), a women's officer (diandé fatoumata) and her assistant (diandé adama). There is an organic link between the governance structure and the chief of Tigre Peul who is also a member of the pastoral group. The group has consultative bodies but they meet only occasionally, depending on the issues to be addressed.Recently, they have been meeting more frequently because of the increasingly pressing constraints they are facing, such as pressure on land due to population growth (births and migrants), worsening climatic conditions (drought, reduced rainfall) and lack of water. The group members appointed the leaders based on their confidence in them, their wisdom and enormous convening power. The group is known only within Zoundweogo Province, mostly by their neighbours and technical services officers. However, they have recently begun a process of legal recognition.The Wakilé Allah pastoral group defines itself as a clan of related families living in seven camps (Wuro) within the pastoral zone. The members of the pastoral group are estimated to total 300 households or approximately 3,000 people including men, women and children. They live primarily from livestock (Table 3). Over the past 10 years, changes have been recorded in both the population and its livestock. In terms of the population, there has been an increase in its size due to births and, to a lesser extent, the arrival of migrants. For livestock and by-products, there has been a decrease in the number of cattle, an increase in the number of small ruminants and a decrease in milk production due to the quantitative and qualitative degradation of pastoral resources (water and fodder) and the increasing competition for their use. The women observe the same changes in the population and livestock, but add that this year the village experienced high animal mortality.The group lives mainly from pastoralism. However, they also engage in other activities such as agriculture (rainfed and market gardening), house construction and rental (in urban areas) and gold panning.Ten years ago, the group was making a living from the same subsistence activities and in the same order, but it was not common to find herders investing in real estate as seen today. This is due to the degradation of the conditions of livestock practices leading to the demotivation of the herders. The degradation of pastoral resources and competition over their use complicates the practice of livestock raising, negatively affects the performance of animals and threatens the security of herders, who are then forced to move on to other, more secure activities.With the boom in gold panning, many young herders are more involved in this activity than in the past. Among the specific women's group, means of subsistence are livestock (selling milk and animals), agriculture (e.g. cultivation of okra, cowpeas and sesame) and the exploitation of non-timber forest products (fruits and tree leaves) and wood (firewood). Generally, the women each have a few head of small ruminants (sheep and goats) that are with the men's herds, driven by boys and girls (10-12 years old). When the cattle go on transhumance, the shepherds are young adults and adults (over 20 years old).The current means of subsistence are those of 10 years ago but with more agricultural activities. According to the women, the reason is the decline in the performance of livestock farming, which faces more constraints. This forces the members of the pastoral group to diversify their activities further.Livestock production within the pastoral group is dominated by large (cattle) and small ruminants (sheep, goats) and donkeys. Economically, cattle are the most important, followed by sheep and goats. During the last 10 years, the composition of the herds has not changed significantly (Table 4). In the case of small ruminants, there have been attempts at crossbreeding between the smaller local breeds and the larger breeds from the north (Bali-Bali sheep, northern goats). However, crossbreeding remains minor as most experiments in this direction have not been conclusive. Over the past decade, negative shifts in climate and pastoral resources have occurred (Table 5). These changes encompass the duration and quality of seasons, plant health and rangeland state. Notably, the rainy season has become shorter, commencing later, ending abruptly or prematurely, with more frequent drought pockets, and accompanied by soil erosion caused by heavy rains.One significant consequence of these alterations in rainfall patterns is the deterioration of plant resources. Iconic woody and herbaceous species, valuable to livestock or other purposes, have dwindled or entirely disappeared.These harsher climate conditions and resource status have strained relations between the pastoral group and other resource users within their village. Over the past three years, these relationships have grown increasingly contentious. To adapt to these challenging environmental conditions, pastoral group members have adopted new practices and reinforced existing ones. These adaptations include:procuring and storing agricultural residues, such as cereal stalks (millet, sorghum) and legume tops (cowpeas, groundnuts), after harvest for distribution to livestock during the dry season preserving natural fodder grasses during ploughing in the cultivated plots of group members, which are later cut and used as supplemental feed for animals during the dry season tapping into water from boreholes and wells dug in lowlands and riverbeds to compensate for water scarcity during the dry season (although catch basins are no longer widespread due to the declining water table and riverbeds being used for collecting construction aggregates, particularly sand) -these solutions are insufficient, and the group is compelled to water their animals in the river, despite concerns about the water's sanitary quality.Mobility, an inherent trait of the pastoral group, has evolved in recent years. The movement of herds, known as transhumance, over short (small transhumance) or long distances (large transhumance) is a well-established strategy for adapting to challenging livestock conditions.At the onset of the dry season (December to February or early March), herders embark on a migration southward, aiming to reach the Columbia area in Ghana. Along the way, they pass through several villages in Burkina Faso, including Gogo, Namoura, Dakola and Navrongo.Their route choice is primarily influenced by the desire to minimise risk and ensure a safe passage without potential conflicts.In the past, typically until the 2000s, the decision on which route to take relied on information gathered by scouts dispatched by the leaders. These scouts assessed factors such as the availability of suitable pastures, access to water sources, overall safety and the ease of reaching grazing areas. However, due to current space constraints, mobility options have become more limited, and predetermined routes are now the norm, eliminating the need for scouts.The journey of these transhumant herders is marked by numerous challenges and difficulties, resulting in substantial losses. These include theft, especially in Ghana, and significant financial burdens such as border taxes, extortion by forestry officials and payments to village chiefs and the Ghanaian administration.During their stay in the host locality of Koumbissa, the herders receive little support from the village chief, who is supposed to act as a mentor. In the past, these mentors played a crucial role in helping herders navigate various difficulties and conflicts, particularly with forestry authorities in Burkina Faso and Ghana. Unfortunately, some mentors are complicit in the extortion schemes that herders often face today.Compared to a decade ago, grazing conditions in these destination areas have deteriorated, and the taxes and fees levied on herders have increased. Consequently, the current circumstances in these host localities are less favourable for transhumants than in previous times. For women, access to water for household use and animal watering has become challenging.Women report that it used to be easier and less time-consuming to obtain water from depressions (shallow water bodies) where men could easily dig pits. This is less feasible today because water tables have dropped, and the collection of sand has become an impediment. Competition for water access is intense. To compensate, women now use boreholes installed in the village, where they can spend hours fetching water. Collaboration among communities has also changed and is less amicable due to conflicts arising from the access and use of natural resources.During the large transhumance in the dry season, women may accompany transhumant herders to their destinations. In this scenario, their role remains focused on selling milk from the herd. During this time, they experience living conditions similar to those in their area of departure. The pastoral resources are the vegetation zones used for grazing (five grazing zones) (indicated with 'v' symbols in the map), the large and small lowlands (indicated with 'ladder' symbols), a vaccination pen (indicated with a red rectangle) and boreholes (indicated with a '1'). The large shallows are located at the southern and northern limits of the pastoral area and water can be found there in the rainy season.The pastoral area has been exploited by the group for 45 years since they settled in the Zoundweogo Province from the north, in particular from Sanmatenga. Historically, the group has been in the village since the droughts of the 1970s and 1980s, which caused the migration of many herders from the north to the south of the country. This group was welcomed and established on its current site by the chief of the indigenous community of Bissas, the ancestor of the current chief of Tigre, which includes the four districts of Tigre Peul, Tigre Bissa, Tigre Pissila and Tigre Yarce.In the rainy season, the livestock feed by grazing in uncultivated areas (five areas) and some animals go to the pastoral zone of Sondré-Est by crossing the lowlands. In this season, the animals drink from the water in the lowlands of the pastoral area. In the dry season, once the field crops have been harvested, the entire pastoral area is grazed by the group's animals and those from neighbouring districts.During this period, the animals drink water from wells in the shallows and boreholes. However, digging wells is becoming difficult, and the wells are used mainly for family water. For this reason, the animals drink from the river, with the risk of becoming ill because the water is too cold and not suitable for animal use.The exploitation of the resources of the pastoral space continues in the same way, with the same intensity, because they are insufficient for the livestock. Indeed, even during transhumance, some animals of the pastoral group remain on site. In general, it is the large herds that go on transhumance. Even in this case, some animals (sick, lactating) are left behind. In addition, farmers' animals will continue to exploit the area, as well as transhumants from the north that may pass through or stop for a while. Also, to take advantage of the resources, the animals come out at night, which allows them to graze close to the houses. This is important in conditions of scarcity or lack of resources.In the last 20 years, changes in land use have been observed. The main changes are:More agricultural use for subsistence by member households and those of neighbouring communities. They are growing sorghum combined with cowpeas adapted to their nutrientpoor land. The women grow okra and other vegetables.Increased application of organic manure to the fields compensates for the loss of soil fertility due to erosion and use.The animals, helped by the shepherds, use tree leaves (aerial fodder) much more than before in the dry season, to compensate for the poor supply of fodder, which is made up of increasingly less rich grasses and in greatly reduced quantities.Digging catch basins in the lowlands is no longer possible because of the collection of sand for construction and the drop in the water table, which requires digging deeper than in the past.The pastures in the southern and western parts are the areas of concentration of fields for agricultural production. Animals are less common there than in the past and are more concentrated in the eastern and northern parts.The practice of transhumance and places frequented according to the severity of the year Like all pastoral groups in Burkina Faso, this group has a long tradition of practising transhumance. The frequency of this practice has increased due to the growing scarcity of water and fodder resources in their usual pastoral areas. During the cold season, which marks the beginning of the dry season, they embark on transhumance journeys to the south, particularly in the Pô region and Ghana. In the early and mid-rainy season, they move to neighbouring forested areas, such as the Sondré-Est pastoral zone and the Nobere classified forest.Their transhumance patterns can vary depending on the prevailing weather conditions, particularly rainfall. In a typical year with good rainfall and ample water and fodder resources, they do not venture too far from their village during transhumance, and there are fewer stops along the way. In the wet season, they head to the Sondré-Est pastoral zone; in the dry season, they move south to the Pô region and Ghana.However, in a year with poor rainfall and limited water and fodder resources, the animals may undertake transhumance to both the pastoral zone of Sondré-Est and the classified forest of Nobere during the wet season. In the dry season of such a challenging year, most animals make their way to Ghana, particularly the Koumbissa area and beyond.Whether it is an ordinary year or a severe one, they frequently visit the East Sondré pastoral zone, although the number of animals and the duration of their stay may differ. In some cases, especially when the herd is substantial, women participate in the transhumance. Their role includes managing tasks such as milking and selling milk until the return. However, the men typically make decisions about the destination and duration of transhumance.The pastoral land management system and grazing rules and regulations need to be robust and strictly enforced during the wet season. During this time, the pastoralist group must show resourcefulness to address its members' challenges.In this season, grazing space is significantly reduced due to crop cultivation, and the trails face severe limitations due to low-lying fields. It is crucial for the group to skilfully use the available space to provide food and water for their animals while also avoiding conflicts related to crop damage with neighbouring communities.Members of the pastoral group face significant challenges when trying to access their space. These challenges vary depending on the season. During the dry season, the primary difficulty lies in accessing the watercourse, which is a tributary of the Nakambé River. This challenge arises due to the presence of nearby market gardening activities. Although market gardening has been practised in the area for some time, it has intensified over the years.In the rainy season, the difficulties are related to a reduction in available grazing space and obstacles created by farmers. During this season, aside from the five designated grazing areas, the remainder of the pastoral space is occupied by fields belonging to members of the pastoral group and neighbouring districts like Tigre Bissa, Tigre Pissila and Tigre Yarce.In some instances, the movement of animals is severely restricted by the proximity of these fields, making it challenging for them to travel between grazing areas. Over time, the fields have extended into the grazing areas, causing a reduction in the size of these areas.Besides animal grazing, there are various other uses of the land in the area, each with its own level of importance:1. rainfed and off-season agriculture, such as market gardening along the banks of the Nakambé River 2. exploitation of forest resources, including wood, leaves, fruits and bark, for medicinal purposes 3. fishing activities.These land uses are practised by both members of the pastoral group and residents from neighbourhoods like Tigre Yarce, Tigre Pissila, Tigre Bissa and nearby villages like Mognoré. However, from the perspective of the pastoral group members, all these additional activities -agriculture, forest-product exploitation and fishing -are considered less important than livestock.Women in the community engage in activities similar to those of the overall group. These include the cultivation of cowpeas and various vegetables (such as okra and sorrel), the harvesting of non-timber and timber forest products and handicrafts such as making seccos (dried foods). For women, agriculture holds similar importance to pastoral activities, whereas the other activities (exploitation of forest products and handicrafts) are considered less significant than pastoral activities.Resources, their users and conditions of access and useThe pastoral space is composed essentially of the following pastoral resources: grazing areas (five in total), large and small shallows, and vaccination parks, including one modern park set up by the state for cattle and traditional parks set up by herders on their concessions for the use of small ruminants (Table 6). These same resource uses are also mentioned by the women, who specify that, for grazing areas, they exploit non-timber forest products, collect firewood for domestic use and sell karite nuts if they collect more than they need for home use, and, on the lowlands, they do household work.The substance of the pastoral group's collective tenure system in the wet season depends on several sources. Access to pasture is available to any animal, whether or not its owner is a member of the pastoral group, including farmers' animals. The use of all these resources (grazing areas, shallows, vaccination parks) by non-members of the pastoral group is the same as for members of the pastoral group, who are the usual users, without discrimination.The grazing areas are dedicated primarily to animal grazing. In addition to pastoral use, these areas are also places for collecting wood and non-wood forest products (e.g. fruit, bark, leaves and honey). In the wet season, the lowlands are primarily used for cultivation and watering in depressions that retain rainwater. But wood and non-wood forest products are also collected there, even if this resource is scarce.In the pastoral space, rights and responsibilities are related to resource access and use.Users have unrestricted access to various resource categories, such as grazing areas, lowlands and vaccination parks, with proximity often determining usage. Park usage varies based on animal type. Women have equal access to these resources, own animals and share responsibility for herding.Constraints like flooding affect lowland access in July and August, while vaccination-park use is tied to animal care needs during the rainy season. Resource exploitation is at a maximum, especially for grazing areas and large lowlands. Access is generally free, but the modern vaccination park incurs a fee. Users must maintain resources, refrain from harmful activities like setting fires, and make minor extensions to established fields. Women's resource use may be controlled or paid for depending on the resource category. There are rights and duties regarding access to and use of the pastoral space.Table 7 indicates there is no limit to access and use of all categories of resources (grazing areas, lowlands, vaccination parks). The user is free to go anywhere within the space of each resource and, in general, proximity to the resource prevails. The use of pens depends on the type of animal, with large pens for cattle and traditional pens for small ruminants. Women have equal access to and use of the various resources within the pastoral space, including grazing areas, lowlands and vaccination parks, just like men do and under the same conditions. They also own animals that are kept alongside those owned by men, and these animals are herded to the grazing areas by family herders, which include young men and women.These resources are used throughout the year. However, certain constraints, such as those experienced in the lowlands due to flooding can render these areas inaccessible, particularly during July and August. As for the vaccination parks, their use is not constant; it depends on the need for animal care, which usually arises at the beginning of the rainy season when animals are susceptible to parasites and certain diseases (Table 8). The exploitation of resources, particularly grazing areas and large lowlands, is at a maximum because of the pressure of use (Table 9). In the grazing areas, each herder individually exploits the space in a rotating manner without any concerted planning. This is akin to herders taking turns from one area to the next, each trying to make the most of the resources. But in the end, all areas are used by everyone at different times unless there is an obstacle that prevents a herder from accessing a particular area. The two large lowlands (south to Tigre Bissa and north to the Sondré pastoral zone) are used more because the water and forage resources in these lowlands are greater than in the others. The use of the vaccination park is not continuous throughout the rainy season but is at its peak at the beginning of the rainy season because of the need to de-worm and vaccinate the animals. Access to and pastoral use of all these resources is free, except for the modern vaccination park, where use is subject to a fee. Each herd owner must pay 1,000 CFA francs, regardless of the size of the herd. 5 Even if access is free in the lowlands, arrangements are necessary between herders and farmers to allow the animals to pass through. These arrangements are still in place today (Table 10).5The CFA franc is the name of two currencies: the West African CFA franc, used in eight West African countries, and the Central African CFA franc, used in six Central African countries. Although separate, the two CFA franc currencies have always been at parity and are effectively interchangeable. As with the overall group, access to resources is free for women, but use is either controlled (grazing areas and lowlands: no cutting of trees, no fires, no new fields) or paid for (vaccination park).Places where the rights and duties of access, use and control of the pastoral space are definedThe community that uses the pastoral space is a clan led by a chief known as the Tigre Peul chief, typically the most experienced and wisest individual within the clan. This chief alone, or in collaboration with other members of the pastoral group for significant decisions, establishes the regulations for accessing and using grazing areas and lowlands.For instance, the chief organised consultations when determining whether to prohibit treecutting or field installation in the area. In contrast, decisions like banning the use of boreholes for watering animals, or allowing a foreign herd temporary access to the pastoral space, were made solely by the chief, who would then inform the community and the Bissa chief of the village. This means that women's land rights remain intact, but they are not actively engaged in the decision-making related to the group's governance, although they may be present during decision-making meetings.The management of the modern vaccination park is distinct. This facility was constructed by the government and is overseen by the Tigre village delegate, who serves as the local administrative representative. Changes to the rules, including rights and responsibilities, generally follow a similar approach. Significant alterations involve the entire pastoral community and may be proposed by them. Conversely, the chief can initiate minor rule adjustments with less impact (Table 12). There is no formal system for recording rights and duties. These are shared orally among men and women. Also, the rights to access and use of all resources can be transferred to someone else, and it is up to the holders of these rights to inform the chief of Tigre Peul and the village chief of Tigre Bissa.It is possible to improve resources, particularly grazing areas, and this decision is made by the leader of the pastoral group. In the past, tree planting and seeding of grazed areas with fodder species have been carried out without success. As the pressure of space use is high, it has not been possible to leave the treated areas at rest. Despite this underperformance, the pastoral group believes these efforts must be renewed and better organised.There is a mechanism in place, but it is not formalised, to monitor land access, use and management. The task of monitoring falls to the community as a whole, which alerts the leader of the pastoral group to any illegal situation. This system, although informal, is applied well and produces satisfactory results.The pastoralist group experiences both internal (among members) and external (between members of the group and actors outside the group) conflicts and these conflicts are generally over access to and use of the land. Internal conflicts are infrequent, rarely open and are quickly resolved amicably without escalating. With actors outside the pastoral group, in particular farmers from neighbouring districts and villages, farmer-herder conflicts related to the agricultural occupation of space, damage to fields and the slaughter of animals are more numerous and have been increasing over the past 10 years. These conflicts can be estimated at an average of five per year (Table 13). when the farmer is at fault (slaughter or injury of animals), there is less chance of success because farmers rarely acknowledge the damage they have caused. In such situations, amicable settlement is difficult and recourse to the CVD (most often on the initiative of the farmers) is inevitable and results in reparations by the wrongdoer.There is an advantage to the amicable settlement, even accompanied by compensation sometimes of the same level as that decided by the CVD. Without the intervention of a third party, this approach is preferred by the actors. It preserves the relations between the protagonists and reinforces the 'living together' in the village.There is no formal loss of access and use rights. However, the perpetrator of the damage may decide not to return to these places out of fear or remorse.According to the group, the strengths of their system lie in the internal understanding among members, collaboration with other communities (particularly the indigenous Bissas), the flexibility of access to and use of most resources and monitoring compliance with the rules (albeit imperfect). The main weaknesses of the tenure system are the lack of structures responsible for monitoring the application of the rules, the great flexibility in access, and the obvious lack of action to reverse the ongoing degradation of the area and its resources.The main characteristic of the system -its flexibility -is both an advantage and a weakness.It is an advantage because, by allowing others access to their resources, the pastoral group benefits from the understanding of other communities to use their spaces. Flexibility appears to be a weakness because open access makes it difficult to manage resources properly.According to the group, the needs for improvement of the pastoral space are twofold: to set up surveillance and monitoring structures and to carry out actions to improve the pastures.The tenure system that the pastoralists use has certain features that fit with how they graze their animals. These important features are:Access to resources -Everyone in the group can access different areas like grazing lands, valleys and vaccination areas. However, in some areas with fields, they need to be careful because they cannot move around as freely.Use of resources -They can use these areas, but there are rules to follow, such as not cutting down trees, starting fires or making new fields. Also, they have to pay a fee for using vaccination parks.Managing natural resources -People in the group get along well and tolerate each other when it comes to using these resources.Table 14 indicates when and how these features are used by the whole group and among the women members. When it comes to women and their animals, there are some noticeable differences regarding vaccination parks. Women usually have smaller animals, so they use traditional pens. They have full control and responsibility for these pens -only the owners can use them, and they must maintain them.Flexibility is the most crucial factor for accessing resources like grazing areas and lowlands.Both the pastoral group and women agree that having the freedom to access these areas is vital for their way of life (Table 15). Control is the top priority for the entire group when it comes to using vaccination parks. This control helps minimise health risks, and the money collected for using the park goes towards its upkeep, but not for dealing with epidemics. That is why ensuring control over payments is very important. These are the qualities that, if lost, could make it difficult for the pastoral group to access and use the land and resources they require (Table 16). When we examine the importance of these land tenure characteristics, both from the group's perspective and from that of the women, we notice a shift in priorities when considering the consequences of their loss on the group's ability to access and use resources:Access to resources -The most critical characteristic of access is the freedom of movement. This is highly important because, once the animals have access to grazing areas and lowlands, they must be able to move around freely to make the most of these resources. The women's group shares this perspective.Use of vaccination parks -When it comes to using vaccination parks, control remains the most crucial attribute for the pastoral group. This is because, without proper control over who can access the park, there is a substantial risk of harm due to the elevated health risk. This heightened risk could result in significant losses in the local herd. Source: author's creationHere, we discuss how secure the community feels about their right to use the communal pastures during the rainy season. Tables related to this section (Tables 17 to 20) are contained in Annex 3.Overall, the group thinks that there is a fairly good chance that they might lose their right to use these pastures against their will, either now or in the near or distant future. However, this negative outlook is starting to improve.The younger members of the group seem more pessimistic about this, while the older ones have more confidence. The older members trust the village chief's wisdom to prevent such a loss, so they are less worried.The adults, in particular, believe that the ongoing discussions and negotiations will eventually lead to positive outcomes and might even reverse the current trend (Table 17).The women are also quite optimistic in general, but we note that this optimism deteriorates. They do not have confidence in the dialogue taking place between their group and the other communities, and they illustrate this by the strong pressure in and around the pastoral space (agricultural occupations) and the progressive deterioration of social cohesion (Table 18).Most people in the community are very confident that their children will inherit the rights to access and use the communal grazing lands. They also believe that their children will be able to keep these rights for their whole lives (Table 19).One reason for their confidence is that they see that their children are better educated than they were, which means they have the knowledge and skills to protect and use these rights effectively.Women (Table 20) are less confident than men. The reasons are related to their reduced optimism about their group's rights to continue to use communal grazing lands as they wish.This section examines the community's confidence in retaining its ability to move livestock and people to and through the wet season rangelands without any involuntary restrictions. Tables related to this section (Tables 21 to 24) are contained in Annex 4.The group has relatively few concerns about the possibility of losing their right to move livestock and people across the common grazing lands without their consent. However, this optimism wanes when considering the near future, especially in the next five years. On the bright side, their confidence grows and becomes stronger beyond that timeframe (Table 20).The explanation provided by the focus group is consistent with the reasoning for the right to access and use collective resources. It revolves around the increasing pressure on pastoral lands, which raises apprehensions for the short term (up to the next five years). Nevertheless, the group believes that, over time, ongoing dialogues will yield satisfactory results (Table 21).As with access and use rights, women are less optimistic that the group will be able to continue to use its mobility rights on wet-season communal pastures. The reasons for this continue to be that women have little faith in the success of the dialogue between the group and other groups in the area (Table 22).The group is fairly confident that their children will inherit their rights to livestock and human mobility, and will be able to retain these rights throughout their lives (Table 23).The feeling among women is slightly different. They are less confident than men. However, confidence among this specific group is slightly better about the possibility that their children can use mobility rights for themselves and their livestock than about the inheritance of these rights (Table 24).This section examines the primary factors that contribute to the community's security in terms of their land rights.Two key factors work together to ensure that the pastoralist group does not lose its right to use and benefit from the communal grazing lands:Internal solidarity -This refers to the unity and cooperation within the pastoralist group.Dialogue with other communities -This involves communication and collaboration with neighbouring communities.Between these two factors, dialogue with other communities takes precedence in maintaining the group's tenure security. In other words, it plays a more significant role in preventing the group from losing its right to use and benefit from the common grazing area. Internal solidarity, while essential, is considered slightly less critical.For women, these same factors and their hierarchy of importance remain consistent. However, instead of 'internal solidarity' and 'dialogue with other communities', women express these as 'understanding within the group' and 'understanding between the pastoral group and other groups'. Essentially, they refer to the same concepts.Primary threats to group land tenure security Several factors, some of which are listed below, pose a threat to the group's land-tenure security, increasing the likelihood that the pastoral group could lose its right to use and benefit from collective grazing areas (Table 25).Loss of group cohesion -a breakdown in unity within the pastoral group.Failure to mark out pastoral space -not clearly designating and defining the areas for pastoral use.Encroachment of fields on pastoral space -expansion of agricultural fields into the pastoral land.Failure to apply or unfavourable application of official grazing laws -either not implementing grazing laws or applying them in a manner unfavourable to the pastoral group.Table 25 shows that the most significant threat to the group's land security is the nonapplication of laws, while the encroachment of fields on the pastoral space is considered the least significant threat. The women see only one major threat, i.e. agricultural pressure on the resources of the pastoral area. The loss of communal grazing rights for the pastoral group would significantly reduce the available space for them to move around and care for their animals. This would force the group to adapt in two primary ways:Shift away from livestock raising -Some members may decide to abandon livestock raising altogether and explore alternative activities such as trade, construction in towns or gold panning. This choice stems from the limited space available for maintaining herds and the desire to avoid conflicts, which become more likely with restricted grazing land.Migrating with the animals also involves substantial risks.Intensify livestock farming -In response to the loss of grazing space, herders who own many livestock may face the risk of food scarcity and potential conflicts. Farmers may reduce their animal numbers and supplement their diet with concentrates and other purchased fodder to mitigate these risks.These consequences are expected to remain consistent regardless of the timeframe considered, whether it is the present, in 5 years, 10 years or beyond. Some herders might even consider returning to their native lands as a response to this challenge.The community has already experienced the loss of portions of the land they previously used, particularly in the Nakambé River area in the eastern part of the pastoral space near the village of Mognoré and the Wuro Issaka neighbourhood. This loss began approximately two decades ago, with the gradual expansion of agricultural fields into these grazing areas.In response, the community has taken actions to either reclaim their land rights or slow the encroachment of agriculture into pastoral lands. These actions include filing complaints with authorities, resulting in the eviction of occupants and marking boundaries. Additionally, they planted trees to deter further encroachment. However, these solutions proved to be temporary as the markers were later damaged, and encroachments resumed. This widespread practice among farmers nationwide signifies a denial of herders' rights to their own space and a challenge to administrative authority.In this section, we analyse specific subgroups within the community -namely men and women -and their access, use and tenure security of wet-season grazing land.Regardless of various categorisation criteria, such as wealth and social commitments, the access and use of land by individual members does not differ significantly from that of the overall group or of women. This implies that neither wealth nor social commitment affects individual access and use rights for pastoral land. Regardless of their social status, individuals primarily use the land for pastoral purposes, followed by agricultural activities and the exploitation of forest products. Among women, this also includes specific crops and the production of seccos.Among men, two major changes have been observed over the past decade: the expansion of fields and the application of organic manure. Field expansion is linked to increased engagement in agricultural activities, affecting everyone irrespective of social class. However, the application of organic manure is associated with wealth levels. Wealthier group members are better equipped to access and use organic manure effectively to enrich their fields due to factors like owning more animals and having financial resources. These changes are primarily driven by spatial pressure and resource degradation, negatively impacting livestock performance and leading to conflicts. This has prompted herders to diversify their activities.Similar changes have occurred among women over the past decade, regardless of individual status (rich, poor, engaged or not engaged). These changes include greater involvement in agriculture and increased exploitation of timber and non-timber forest products. These shifts among women are linked to reduced income from milk sales, which were previously used to meet various family needs.The advantages, disadvantages and suggested improvements in the land tenure system from the specific perspectives of the identified categories do not significantly differ from those of the overall pastoralist and women's groups. However, three noteworthy improvements emerge, with the third suggestion coming exclusively from the women's subgroups:Delimitation of the pastoral space -the need to clearly define the boundaries of the pastoral space.Maintenance of the park (backfilling if necessary) -ensuring the proper upkeep of the park, including any required backfilling.Utilitarian tree species -planting trees that serve multiple purposes beyond grazing, benefiting women in particular.These proposed improvements aim to enhance the overall land tenure system, benefiting both men and women within the community (Table 26). This section explores how individuals within the community view the land tenure system and its alignment with their grazing practices.Characteristics that support grazing practices -The essential characteristics of the tenure system that make it well suited for pastoral practices are consistent across all individual perspectives, regardless of the category considered.Access to resources -Flexibility is crucial for all resources, including grazing areas, lowlands and vaccination parks. Freedom of movement within grazing areas and lowlands is essential, although this freedom is somewhat restricted in lowlands due to the presence of fields. This limitation necessitates vigilance from herders in monitoring their animals.Use of resources -Controlled use is emphasised for all resources, and there is a fee (1,000 CFA francs per herd) for vaccination parks. Access to grazing areas and lowlands is subject to specific rules, such as prohibiting pruning, clearing, bushfires and new fields.Natural resource management -Mutual tolerance is valued for all resources, including grazing areas, lowlands and vaccination parks.Women, who typically have smaller ruminants, use traditional parks, and the access and use of these areas is individually controlled. Only the owners have access and use rights, and sole responsibility for maintenance and management. In terms of the importance of these characteristics, the classification indicates the following:Access to resources -Flexibility is the most critical characteristic for grazing areas and lowlands. The pastoral group and women both view free access to resources as crucial for the sustainability of their practices.Use of vaccination parks -At the overall group level, control is deemed the most important characteristic because it minimises health risks. The funds collected help maintain the park but cannot be used to address an epidemic, emphasising the significance of control over payments.Among individual female groups, the classification remains the same, except for their explanation, which revolves around the satisfaction of their animals. They consider flexibility of access more important, as, without it, they cannot ensure movement within the areas.The results of the analysis regarding the impact of losing these characteristics on access and resource use align with those of the overall group and the women's group:Access to resources -Freedom of movement is the most vital characteristic of access. This includes the ability of animals to move within grazing areas and lowlands once they have access to them to exploit resources. The women's group shares this perspective.Use of vaccination parks -Control remains the most important characteristic according to the pastoral group. The rationale behind this is that, without control over access to the park, the risk of harm is substantial due to high health risks, potentially leading to significant livestock mortality.This section examines the key factors that contribute to the land security of individuals within the community.Among adult men, two factors -solidarity among community members and attachment of community members to their land -are consistently mentioned, regardless of wealth levels or social commitment. Similarly, when considering social commitment or wealth, the same factors, collaboration with other communities and solidarity among community members, are cited. One factor, internal solidarity, is mentioned in both contexts but differs in ranking regarding its contribution to individual security. It is considered highly important in the context of social commitment and fairly important in terms of wealth levels (Table 27). Among the women individually considered, three factors were cited in the following order of importance: more important (acceptance among the inhabitants of the village), very important (solidarity among the members of the community) and fairly important (pity for the lonely, such as widows and divorcees).The consequences of losing collective grazing rights for an individual, regardless of gender, social commitment or wealth level, are nearly identical (Table 28). Individual members will generally adapt by changing their activities and intensifying livestock activities (with downsizing). From now on and for ever Change of activities (gold panning, trade, real estate) because there will no longer be enough space, especially grazing areas for the animals Intensification of livestock farming because there will no longer be enough space, especially grazing areas, so they do not want to migrateThe community members are thus adapting to the new realities, and these activities will become stronger over timeFrom now on and for ever Change of activities (small businesses, handicrafts of seccos and mats) because there will no longer be enough space, especially grazing areas and they are adapting to the new realities Intensification of breeding (fattening) because there will not be enough space any more, in particular, pasture. Also, they do not want to migrate Source: author's creationWe conducted an exercise involving six individuals, including men and women and considering various categories such as social engagement and wealth level. These individuals shared their perspectives on how to enhance individual rights to communal land. It became evident that concerted action is needed both within and beyond the pastoral group to address this issue effectively:Enhanced surveillance -To restrict outsiders' entry and use of pastoral land, there is a need to re-evaluate the existing rules and engage in dialogues with neighbouring communities. Encouragingly, the current village chief, Chief Bissa, is open to dialogue and cooperation.Improved management of grazing areas -The group should organise itself to oversee and enhance the management of grazing areas, including improvements to existing practices.Government enforcement of land laws -There is an expectation that government authorities will actively enforce land laws that safeguard traditional grazing areas from conversion into agricultural plots.Furthermore, the group believes that, considering the present circumstances, the current rights of its members are satisfactory and should remain unchanged for the foreseeable future.Individual members of the pastoral group, irrespective of their social engagement and wealth level, have experienced the gradual loss of pasture land over the past 23 years. This loss has primarily affected the eastern part of the pastoral area, particularly in the grazing areas and lowlands. Agricultural pressure is the driving force behind this land loss, as land previously used for livestock is being converted into farmland by group members and individuals outside the pastoral community.To address this issue, the pastoralist group has united to assert its rights to the land. This involved engaging with Chief Bissa and administrative authorities responsible for animal resources. While some occupants were temporarily removed, grazing areas and lowland encroachment have resumed. This situation can be attributed to farmers' denial of pastoralists' rights and a lack of confidence from the administrative authorities in resolving the matter effectively.The Wakilé Allah pastoral group's land tenure system, particularly in the wet-season grazing areas, aligns with the Law on the Orientation of Pastoralism (LORP), designating these lands as reserved for grazing. These areas are a vital part of the pastoral lifestyle, traditionally dedicated to livestock activities. These lands are privately owned but managed under collective customary rights. Originally owned by the indigenous Bissa community, they were transferred to the pastoral group without formal land ownership titles.Seasonal variations impact land use, with dry seasons involving extensive grazing, while rainy seasons witness widespread cultivation in lowlands, leaving limited space for animals. This land tenure system is best described as collective and permissive. Access to resources, mainly grazing areas and lowlands, remains open, with regulation, control or payment necessary only for modern vaccination parks. Management is relatively lenient, with limited sanctions and collective enforcement. Notably, the pastoral group sets its own rules on resource access and management, which align with the LORP. However, these rules gain enforceability against third parties after validation by the municipal council.While this permissiveness may seem to endanger the pastoral space and resources, it is viewed as essential by the pastoral group. Considering mounting external pressures, they believe these rules are crucial for their practices and resource sustainability. The pastoral space alone cannot suffice for their extensive herds, resulting in a need for open access to maintain mobility.Tree plantations and forage-species seeding have had limited success in combating qualitative degradation. As a result, the group practices transhumance, a common pastoral strategy to adapt to seasonal resource variability. Coupled with localised changes within the group, mobility is a response to resource degradation and increased agricultural pressure. These changes include a shift toward intensified livestock practices, reduced herd sizes and increased supplementary feeding, along with more extensive use of aerial fodder.Within the Wakilé Allah pastoral group, both men and women access and use resources similarly, with differences driven by their specific interests. Men focus on animal-related resources, while women prioritise forest products for household sustenance and income generation. Apart from this gender-based distinction, no significant differences are observed based on marital status, social engagement or wealth level. It is worth noting that younger men and women are less optimistic about maintaining access to collective resources and passing these rights to their offspring. They express concerns about the ongoing dialogue's effectiveness, the non-rigorous enforcement of laws protecting herders' rights, and escalating external conflicts with non-group members.Efforts to resolve conflicts emphasise amicable settlements, typically informally through consultations between parties. External intervention is rare and occurs when the offending party refuses to acknowledge wrongdoing.While the customary system for managing pastoral land is widely accepted, concerns linger regarding its security. Customary land ownership is legally recognised in Burkina Faso, but formalisation through certificates is encouraged. Yet, for collective lands like pastoral areas, the LORP and rural land tenure laws provide mechanisms for security. As mandated by law, local land charters could play a role in securing these collective lands.Protective actions must be taken to address threats to tenure security, such as loss of cohesion, unmarked pastoral spaces, encroachments by agriculture and inadequate law enforcement. Registration of the pastoral area in the name of the pastoral group or the commune is a crucial step. If registered under the commune, the group retains usage rights without ownership. Registration in the group's name grants ownership, but costs and consent from the Bissa chief are factors to consider.While challenges to tenure security exist, the collective land tenure system remains adaptable, reinforcing the resilience of the Wakilé Allah pastoral group in the face of changing conditions and resource pressures.Examining the Wakilé Allah pastoral group's land tenure system and its members' perceptions of security reveals a flexible system that has effectively supported their land-use practices despite many challenges. While their tenure system has served pastoral practices well thus far, it shows signs of vulnerability due to multiple threats. These threats include the nonenforcement of grazing-related regulations, the absence of spatial demarcation, the gradual erosion of group cohesion and encroachment by agricultural activities.Addressing the current threats to the pastoral group's land tenure system requires a balanced approach that safeguards their traditional practices while providing legal protections through proper land management and registration. In response to these challenges, the pastoral group calls for remedial actions to safeguard their land and resources. While this request is wellfounded, it carries the potential risk of compromising the group's mobility, both internally and externally. Mobility is a fundamental aspect of the group's pastoral practices and is essential to ensure that their animals can continue transhumance without being confined to neighbouring villages' territories. Following the terminology of Gonin (2016), this transition could shift the pastoral land tenure system from one based on security through reciprocity to one based on security through exclusive resource appropriation.Securing the land-tenure system entails two main steps:1. Registration and community benefit -To further strengthen land security, the pastoral area should be officially registered for the community's benefit. This process involves the delineation, demarcation and clarification of rights that may be held by customary landowners. Registering the land in the name of the community will provide additional legal protection and tenure security. This law, known as the Law on the Orientation of Pastoralism (LORP), is the primary legal framework for pastoralism in Burkina Faso. It sets out principles and methods for the sustainable development of pastoral activities and grants important rights to herders regarding access to and use of pastoral resources.Access to and use of specially developed pastoral areas Special management pastoral areas, often referred to as pastoral zones, are governed by Article 13 of the LORP. According to this article, pastoralists who hold authorisation or settlement permits are allowed access to these designated areas, and access to these zones is regulated by responsible authorities.a. Only pastoralists with proper authorisation or permits are permitted entry into these special management pastoral areas. It is worth noting that access to grazing areas is further governed by Decree No. 2-7-410/PRES/PM/MRA/MFP dated 3 July 2007. This decree outlines the general terms for allocating, occupying and using managed grazing areas.b. The allocation of specific land plots within these areas for individual use rather than ownership is determined by an allocation commission. Article 10 of the decree specifies that the occupation and use of these land plots within developed pastoral zones are based on either an exploitation permit or an emphyteutic lease, which specifies the terms and duration of use.c. Besides granting enjoyment rights, the state may also award concessions for specific portions of a pastoral zone, as detailed in the same Article 10 of the decree. In such cases, a concession allows an individual or private entity to manage the designated area granted by the state.Pastoralists have free access to land reserved for grazing, but local communities can regulate this access through local land charters (Article 14). This article states that pastoralists have the right to freely access areas reserved for animal grazing, giving them access to all available resources. a. However, the law also allows local communities, such as grassroots populations, to manage access to these resources in collaboration with local or decentralised authorities. This collaborative effort aims to ensure the sustainable use of these resources. One tool used for regulating access and utilisation of these resources is the local land charter. Pastoralists can access fields left fallow or harvested after crops, subject to certain conditions. Spaces available for animal grazing are areas initially intended for purposes other than pastoral activities, as indicated by ONF-BF in 2017. However, the LORP outlines the rights of pastoralists regarding access and use of these spaces, taking into account the specific laws governing these areas.a. According to Article 24, pastoralists share their rights with other rural operators, such as farmers and those involved in non-timber forest products. This means that pastoralists have the right to use these areas while complying with forestry regulations. They also have access to fields left fallow or to fields after the harvest (Article 26), regardless of who the owner is, unless the owner expressly forbids it.The law grants pastoralists the right to access water points for their animals, subject to water management laws of the LORP (Article 28).a. The rules for water use by pastoralists are determined not only by the LORP but also by Law No. 2-2-1/AN of 8 February 2001 on the orientation law relating to water management. For access to water points, the LORP provides for the establishment of easements of passage imposed on the land bordering these water points.Herders have the right to move livestock within the country and internationally, adhering to relevant laws.a. Transhumant herders need to follow the existing laws, specifically the LORP that regulates national transhumance and Decision A/DEC 5/1-/98, which governs transhumance between member states of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).To travel with their animals and access grazing areas or markets for selling their livestock, herders use specific routes known as livestock tracks.b. The LORP (Article 43) distinguishes between different types of tracks: access tracks (for accessing grazing resources), transhumance tracks (for moving animals within the country and beyond), and marketing tracks (for reaching markets). These tracks are clearly marked and categorised as part of the public domain, owned by either the state or local authorities, as explained in Article 46. These tracks may have markers to help herders navigate their routes depending on the circumstances.The law provides for conciliation as a means of settling disputes related to pastoral activities before resorting to legal proceedings. Articles 67 and 68 of Law No. 34-2-2/AN, enacted on 14 November 2002 concerning pastoralism, introduce conciliation as a way to resolve disputes related to pastoral activities. Article 67 specifies that, before any legal action, disputes linked to pastoralism must undergo a mandatory conciliation process.a. This process occurs within a local conciliation commission that includes representatives from both farmers and pastoralists. The outcomes of this initial conciliation are documented in a report, whether an agreement is reached or not, as explained in Article 68. This right granted to pastoral producers enables them to resolve conflicts while considering their traditions and practices, avoiding lengthy legal proceedings that could disrupt their activities.ANNEX The law clarifies that rural lands developed with public funds, including those for pastoral purposes, fall under the state's private immovable domain (Article 25). These lands may later be transferred to local authorities (Article 27). Furthermore, the law mandates the identification, demarcation and registration of state and local authority lands, including pastoral areas, to ensure their peaceful and sustainable use (Articles 26 and 30). Collective lands, as defined by the LORP or rural land tenure law, may belong to one of these land categories based on how they are secured.When it comes to local rules for accessing pastoral resources, the LORP states that local communities working with herder organisations can establish these rules (Articles 14 and 15). This includes regulations for collective pastoral lands, covering their use and management, all aimed at sustainable natural resource management. The specific details of these rules are determined by a joint order issued by ministers responsible for livestock, water, forestry, agriculture, land administration and finance.However, in the rural land tenure law, the local land charters define these particular rules for accessing, using and governing natural resources. These charters must receive validation from the municipal councils of local authorities. Given that all pastoral activities are inherently connected to the land, it appears necessary to align the pastoral law, which pre-dates the rural land-tenure law, with the latter.Law No. 34-2-9/AN specifically addresses the land rights of women and youth (unlike the LORP, which considers the household as a whole). It lacks provisions that actively promote the participation of women and youth in decision-making and consultation bodies, for instance. However, Article 75 allows for the possibility of setting quotas through regulations for the allocation of land developed by the state and local authorities to women and young people.There are also differences regarding land tenure security for pastoral areas. The LORP, in Article 18, states that 'pastoral areas of special development existing at the time of this law's enforcement are incorporated into the state's domain, which then proceeds to delineate, demarcate and register these areas in its name.' This provision does not explicitly address the resolution of existing land rights, such as compensating customary landowners, which is essential during the registration process. In contrast, rural land-tenure law mandates compensation for land rights holders during the development and registration of pastoral areas, as outlined in Article 33, with further details provided in a related decree.The purpose of this law is to set broad guidelines for the sustainable development of agrosylvo-pastoral, fisheries and wildlife activities to achieve food sovereignty and food and nutritional security to contribute to the sustainable development of Burkina Faso (Article 1).To this end, the law aims to ensure: (1) the promotion of productive investments in the rural sector (including small-scale investments in family farming) through easy access to production factors, the existence of an appropriate tax system and agro-sylvo-pastoral insurance to cover production-related risks;(2) facilitating access to factors of production, in particular rural land and land tenure security, water control and supply, inputs and equipment, energy, infrastructure, labour and financing;(3) facilitating access to markets and processing of agrosylvo-pastoral, fishery and wildlife products; (4) environmental protection and sustainable management of natural resources, in particular through the fight against agricultural pollution, restoration and/or preservation of biodiversity and degraded land; and (5) balanced and coherent land-use planning for the use of rural areas for agro-sylvo-pastoral, fishing and wildlife purposes in harmony with other uses.As with Law No. 34-2-9/AN on rural land tenure, Law No. 7-2-15/CNT differs from LORP on the issue of access to rural land for women and youth. Law No. 7-2-15/CNT requires the state and local authorities (Articles 1 to 6) to reserve at least 3% of developed land for vulnerable people, particularly women and the young.The Agrarian and Land Reorganisation law (RAF) in Burkina Faso, initially drafted in 1984 and revised in 1996, is a comprehensive law that addresses rural and urban land tenure in Burkina Faso. It applies to the national land domain (Article 2), which includes the land owned by the state, local authorities and private individuals. This law serves two main purposes:It outlines the legal framework for land within the national land domain. This includes defining land status, establishing general principles for territorial planning and sustainable development, managing land and other natural resources, and regulating property rights.It provides guidelines for agrarian policies (Article 1). This involves specifying how the land of the state, local authorities and private individuals is composed, established and managed.It is important to note that the law emphasises the importance of registration as a common method of protecting land in both the state land domain (Article 122) and the land domain of local authorities (Article 155). This means that, after identifying and registering its land, the state has the option to transfer ownership to municipalities. Similarly, it can delegate the management of these domains to regional and municipal authorities.Additionally, this law introduces the concept of purging revealed rights, which should be considered more extensively in the LORP. The LORP, drafted in 2002 before the adoption of the 2012 Agrarian and Land Reorganisaiton law (RAF), did not adequately address the need to compensate land rights holders when securing land in pastoral areas. This aspect of land tenure should be more comprehensively integrated into the LORP to align with the RAF's provisions.This law on expropriation and compensation is relevant for creating areas reserved for pastoral activities through expropriation if consensus cannot be reached. Expropriation is described as a process in which the state or local authority can, in the public interest and with fair compensation provided beforehand, require someone to transfer the ownership of land or a real property right to them, as stated in Article 7 of the law. So, if individuals cannot agree on clearing land for pastoral activities, expropriation could be considered as a method to allocate land for pastoral purposes, such as establishing cattle tracks and pastoral areas.This law on the planning and sustainable development of the territory is important for resource management. This law does not exclusively pertain to rural land. However, it does establish principles, regulations and processes for creating different land-use and sustainable development plans. This framework enables more effective utilisation of natural resources and improved environmental conservation. Article 2 of this law explicitly states its objectives, including advancing social well-being, economic efficiency and environmental protection in alignment with community land-use planning policies.The Forestry Code provides regulations on the use of forests and protected areas, affecting pastoral areas within those zones. This law lays out the framework for establishing and overseeing pastoral areas by territorial authorities. According to Article 28 of the law, a rural commune's territory comprises three key zones: a residential area, a production area and a conservation area. Production areas primarily serve purposes such as agriculture, livestock, forestry, fish farming and various rural activities. The conservation areas are designated for protecting natural resources.When we combine this law with other regulations concerning land tenure, we can see that these legal provisions empower local authorities (such as regions and communes) to directly create pastoral areas and take charge of their management. However, these communes and regions might also be tasked with overseeing pastoral areas that have been transferred to them by the state or areas where the state has delegated management responsibilities to them.Since 2014, the state has delegated land management to territorial communities. However, the lack of proper land registration for state-owned land and land held by territorial communities has made the physical management of these transferred areas quite challenging.The main point of the Forestry Code is to establish regulations for the protection of forests, wildlife and fishery resources. It allows for the creation of pastoral areas within protected forests but strictly prohibits them in classified forests, which have strict usage rules. According to this law, pastoral areas can be established within protected forests but are not allowed in classified forests. Classified forests are subject to strict usage restrictions. Both classified forests and protected areas like national parks, wildlife reserves and sanctuaries have a 'nograzing' policy for livestock.In exceptional circumstances, such as a severe shortage of food for livestock officially recognised by the government, the Council of Ministers can grant permission through a decree to temporarily allow grazing in specific classified forests. Each decree permitting such an extraordinary opening of a forest must outline the specific limitations and rules applicable to that particular forest (Article 7 of the Forestry Code).The environmental code seeks to protect living beings by improving environmental conditions. Article 3 clearly states its purpose, which is closely tied to safeguarding pastoral resources. The environmental code is designed to shield living creatures from harmful or troublesome threats and hazards arising from environmental degradation and to enhance their overall living conditions.The duty to safeguard the environment is not only outlined in the preamble of the Constitution dated 2 June 1991 but also explicitly mentioned in Article 29. The obligation to adhere to environmental protection regulations is present in all documents related to pastoral zones, including the LORP, general or specific specifications.This law relates to water management, critical for pastoralists' access to water resources. Article 1 emphasises the significance of water as a precious resource and underscores the critical need for its sustainable management at the national level. Effective water management, guided by environmental considerations and legal priorities, aims to achieve several objectives that are to: ensure the provision of safe drinking water for the population address and harmonise the demands of various sectors, including agriculture, livestock farming, fishing, aquaculture, mineral extraction, industry and energy production "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4115199292.json b/main/part_2/4115199292.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45c52d92b79c365911bb23a829b0073fcbbcacdc --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4115199292.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"211a8cfeff8f3d759be0490097fa1ad3","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6fbfe478-9375-4f02-a26c-778100e6f035/retrieve","id":"1277275719"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9870018d-93fe-4ce8-877b-863f7adc6a2d","content":"Identifying existing Community knowledge Groups (CKG) and institutions as a basis to establish Innovation Platform • Introducing high value trees (HVT) 5 varieties of Avocado (Percia america), Apple (Malus domestica Borkh ), 5 varieties of Walnut (Fig 4) • Testing and identifying their suitability through on farm, experimental, laboratory trial, socio economic survey, and capacity building • Effect of management practices, (watering regime, mulching, fruit thinning, root stock compatibility) on survival, growth, yield and fruit quality"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4126377815.json b/main/part_2/4126377815.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce742d1f4ce4cdcee9e73aebb33c09659a4ea97d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4126377815.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"fea1cebe-2944-46df-a078-dded7ea9c562","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4135988404.json b/main/part_2/4135988404.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51331ea5312aa783c450c9d46074d396640be18c --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4135988404.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"98a37f0c58bd6496049b314428c3abdc","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/80502d8a-f35b-488e-b817-0e22b1d9229e/retrieve","id":"-271772303"},"keywords":["agro-ecological zones","farmers' indigenous knowledge","midDRIFTS","resource endowment","SOC stability index","soil fertility variability"],"sieverID":"6117f3f5-1de7-45b1-8692-5a2e52cec9ad","content":"Site-specific soil fertility management requires a fundamental understanding of factors that modulate soil fertility variability in the local context. To verify this assumption, this study hypothesized that soil fertility variability across two regions in Central and Western Ethiopia is determined by inter-related effects of agro-ecological zones and farmers' resource endowment ('wealthy' versus 'poor' farmers). Mid-infrared spectroscopy coupled to partial least squares regression (midDRIFTS-PLSR) and wet-laboratory analyses were used to assess the soil fertility (soil pH, total soil carbon [TC] and nitrogen [TN], plant-available phosphorous [P av ] and potassium [K av ]) across four agro-ecological zones: 'High-Dega' (HD), 'Dega' (D), 'Weina-Dega' (WD) and 'Kola' (K). MidDRIFTS peak area analysis of spectral frequencies (2,930 [aliphatic C-H], 1,620 [aromatic C = C], 1,159 [C-O poly-alcoholic and ethergroups] cm -1 ) was applied to characterize soil organic carbon (SOC) quality and to calculate the SOC stability index (1,620:2,930). Higher TC in HD, as well as higher TN and K av contents in K were found in fields of wealthy compared with poor farmers. Resource endowment dependent soil fertility management options revealed SOC of higher quality in wealthy compared with poor farms in D. Agro-ecological zones distinctions contributed to these soil fertility differences. Farmers distinguished visually fertile and less fertile fields based on soil colour. Higher pH in K and WD as well as P av in K and HD were found in fertile (brown/black) than less fertile (red) soils. To conclude, tailor-made soil fertility management in the local context must consider agro-ecological zones and resource endowment interactions along with farmers' indigenous knowledge.Integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) is an intervention strategy to counteract the problem of soil fertility depletion of smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) (Vanlauwe et al., 2010). Its adoption across different regions of SSA remains, however, challenging (Vanlauwe et al., 2015). This is mainly due to resource shortcomings (e.g., land size, capital) that force resource-constrained farmers to expand into marginal lands, while wealthy farmers continue investing in fertile lands. This situation is aggravated by insecure tenure systems, prohibiting farmers from investing in their land, along with limited access to fertilizer inputs (Stevenson et al., 2019). These features have led to highly variable soil fertility levels across and within regions, magnified by inherent heterogeneity of agro-ecological zones and a wide range in socio-economic status among smallholder farmers (Tittonell et al., 2005). Heterogeneity of soil fertility does not allow uniform soil management strategies in larger areas, making ISFM adjusted to local contexts more essential. To tailor demand-oriented ISFM interventions to smallholder conditions under different local contexts, factors modulating soil fertility variability must be understood, considering farmers' resource endowment (i.e., their wealth) and indigenous knowledge (Tittonell et al., 2005;Vanlauwe et al., 2015).Previous soil fertility assessments in Eastern (e.g., Kenya) and Southern (e.g., Zimbabwe) Africa revealed the influence of densely populated landscapes, biophysical factors, farmers' resource endowment and distance of cultivated fields from homesteads on soil fertility management options (Nyamangara et al., 2011;Tittonell et al., 2010;Tittonell, Vanlauwe, Leffelaar, Rowe, et al., 2005). These studies were, however, not based on generic and harmonized soil surveying procedures, making direct comparisons across different agroecological zones and smallholder farming systems difficult. Africa Soil Information Service (AfSIS) (Vågen et al., 2010) and Ethiopian Soil Information System (EthioSIS) (Amare et al., 2018) have made important progress in consolidating existing soil fertility survey protocols for several African countries, including Ethiopia. Nevertheless, (a) the interrelated effects of agro-ecological zones and farmers' resource endowments, along with (b) farmers' indigenous knowledge as additional proxies for soil fertility assessment have so far been neglected and thus need further investigation. This is justified as it could be suggested that continuous knowledge transfer among farmers within and across agro-ecological zones (Leta et al., 2018), as well as contrasting agroecological and geological contexts (Mengistu, 2003) modulate soil fertility variability. Hence, it was our first objective to perform a local soil fertility survey to test the hypothesis that not only individual but also inter-related effects of agroecological zones and farmers' resource endowments affect soil fertility variability in a local context. Our second objective was to verify that farmers' indigenous knowledge of soil fertility status is not driven by inter-related effects of agroecology and farm typology. This assumption was based on the continuous transfer of knowledge among farmers within and across agro-ecological zones (Leta et al., 2018).The soil fertility survey was conducted in four contrasting agro-ecological zones of Central and Western Ethiopia, which were defined according to Mengistu (2003) and Hurni (1998): (a) 'Kola' (K) (<1,500 m a.s.l., average temperatures of 15-27°C, average rainfall of 2,037 mm), and (b) 'Weina-Dega' (WD) (1,500-2,500 m a.s.l., 15-27°C, 1,376 mm), (c) 'Dega' (D) (2,500-3,200 m a.s.l., ≤9°C, 938 mm) and (d) 'High-Dega' (HD) (3200-3500 m a.s.l., ≤9°C, 938 mm). Agro-ecological zones K (Lelisadimtu [36°24'E; 9°02'N]) and WD (Fromsa [36°45'E; 9°03'N]) are subsistence maize-dominated crop-livestock farming systems and Nitisols with clay texture (FAO, 2015), while D (Kolugelan [38°9'E; 9°22'N]) and HD (Chilanko [38°11'E; 9°20'N]) are dominated by market-oriented potato/barley systems as well as Luvisols and Alisols with clay texture (FAO, 2015). Lelisadimtu and Fromsa were located in Diga District (Western Ethiopia), while Kolugelan and Chilanko were located in Jeldu district (Central Ethiopia) (Table 1; Figure S1).Farm typologies (resource endowment) at the target sites (villages) were defined during village meetings and focus group discussions. Two to three focus group discussions with a total of 16-18 household heads with an equal share of females and males as well as young and old farmers were held in each agro-ecological zone. The main farm typology indicators were farm size (landholdings (LH)), livestock ownership and level of agricultural inputs (i.e., chemical fertilizer) (Haileslassie et al., 2006;Kebede et al., 2019). Thresholds set by farmers in all villages were <2 ha farm size, <6 tropical livestock units (TLU), and relatively low chemical fertilizer rates to categorize farmers as 'Eyeessaa (poor)', while a LH of ≥4 ha, ≥8 TLU and use of full fertilizer rates (100 kg urea and 100 kg DAP) were defined as 'Ditta (wealthy)'. This is because wealthy farmers frequently intend to maximize crop productivity by applying fertilizer, whereas poor farmers cannot follow a similar strategy due to a lack of cash to purchase fertilizer. To confirm the agreed farm typology thresholds, detailed data on farm typology indicators were collected on 90 predefined wealthy and poor households (10% of the total population) (Table 1).AGUMAS et Al.In each agro-ecological zone (n = 4), 14 individual households (seven wealthy, seven poor) per farm typology were selected (Dawoe et al., 2012;Nyamangara et al., 2011). On each farm, the head of the household was requested to indicate the most and least fertile field plots based on their individual indigenous knowledge about soil fertility status. Hence, two field plots per household (fertile and poor) were selected for soil sample collection (Vågen et al., 2012). According to Yeshaneh (2015), farmers use soil colour as the most important indicator of soil fertility, where black and brown soils were considered as fertile and red soils as less fertile.During soil sampling, the household head indicated the colour of the specified soil of the field plot. According to the sampling procedure, a total number of 224 geo-referenced soil samples were collected (four agro-ecological zones (K, WD, D, HD) × 2 farm typologies (wealthy, poor) × 7 farms per typology × 2 fields per farm (fertile and less fertile) × 2 soil depths (0-20 cm, 21-50 cm)). Soil samples were airdried and passed through a 2 mm sieve prior shipping to the University of Hohenheim (Stuttgart, Germany) for further analysis.Soil pH (CaCl 2 ) was measured according to Houba et al. (2000). Total carbon (TC) and nitrogen (TN) were analysed by dry combustion. Available phosphorus (P av ) was measured colorimetrically at 720 nm using the Bray1 method (Bray and Kurtz (1945). Available potassium (K av ) was analysed using ICP-OES (Agilent 5100) (Schüller, 1969). Calcium-acetate-lactate was used as extractant for both phosphorous and potassium.MidDRFIFTS-based analyses were performed according to Mirzaeitalarposhti et al. (2015), Rasche et al. (2013) and Demyan et al. (2012). MidDRIFTS-PLSR-based prediction models for each soil chemical property (i.e., TC, TN, pH, P av and K av ) were constructed with the OPUS-QUANT2 package of OPUS v7.5 (Bruker Optik GmbH) (Rasche et al., 2013). Similarly, peak area integration by midDRIFTS using OPUS 7.5 software (Bruker Optik GmbH) (Demyan et al., 2012) was conducted to provide an additional measure of the soil fertility status. Three prominent peaks (i.e., 2,930, 1,620 and 1,159 cm -1 ) with their respective integration limits (3,000-2,800, 1,770-1,496, 1,180-1,126 cm -1 ) representing different organic functional groups of SOC were used as additional soil fertility indicators (Baes & Bloom, 1989;Demyan et al., 2012;Senesi et al., 2003). Peak 2,930 cm -1 represents less stable aliphatic C-H groups, components of the active SOC pool (Demyan et al., 2012;Laub et al., 2019). Peak 1,620 cm -1 represents more stable aromatic C = C bonds as part of the recalcitrant SOC pool (Demyan et al., 2012;Laub et al., 2019). The third peak at 1,159 cm -1 represents C-O poly-alcoholic and ether groups, commonly regarded as very stable C compounds (Demyan et al., 2012;Senesi et al., 2003). The ratio of the functional groups 1,620 and 1,159 versus 2,930 cm -1 is commonly calculated as the SOC stability index, which is used as a soil quality indicator. Further methodological details are given in the Supporting information of this paper. Weina-Dega (WD) Wealthy (Ditta) 4.4 (0.9) abc 8. Univariate analysis using Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests was conducted to determine if the data met the assumptions of normality. Except for P av and K av , all soil chemical properties met the assumption. For P av and K av , logarithmic and square root transformations were performed, respectively. Factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to assess the effect of agro-ecology, farm typology (resource endowment class), farmers' indigenous knowledge and their interaction on soil fertility status, using a mixed model with restricted maximum likelihood (REML) (Piepho et al., 2003) (SAS statistical software, version 9.4; SAS Institute). Agro-ecology, farm typology and soil fertility status as defined by farmers were considered as fixed effects, while each field and the interaction between individual factors were included as random effects (Piepho et al., 2004). Means separation (p < 0.05) was done using pdiff LINES command in GLIMMIX (SAS Institute).3.1 | Inter-related effect of agro-ecological zones and farmers' resource endowment on soil fertilityAnalysis of variance showed that not only agro-ecological zone but also farmers' resource endowment had a significant effect on soil fertility indicators (i.e., TC, TN, K av ; p < 0.01) (Figure 1). However, pH and P av were only influenced by agro-ecological zone (p <.01). An interaction effect between agro-ecological zone and resource endowment was observed for K av (p < 0.01) (Figure 1d). The higher K av values (234 mg kg -1 ) were noted for fields of wealthy farmers in 'Kola' (K), while the lowest K av values (62 mg kg -1 ) were recorded on wealthy farms in 'Dega' (D) (p < 0.01) (Figure 1d). The highest values of TC and TN were observed in 'Weina-Dega' (WD) in both farm typologies, while the lowest TC was found in fields of D (p < 0.01) (Figure 1a). In 'High-Dega' (HD), higher TC and higher TN contents in K were found in fields of wealthy compared with less wealthy farmers (p < 0.01) (Figure 1a,b). Agro-ecological zone influenced soil pH and P av (p < 0.001) (Figure 1c,e), where lowest values were observed in WD. No effect of farm typology was found for pH and P av (p > 0.05) (Figure 1c,e). Three dominant relative peak areas representing SOC functional groups were identified and used as proxies for SOC quality: (a) 2,930 cm -1 (C-H-aliphatic groups), (b) 1,620 cm -1 (C = C-aromatic groups) and (c) 1,159 cm -1 (C-O polyalcoholic and ether group) (Figure 2a-c The relative peak areas of these SOC functional groups and the SOC stability index, calculated as the ratio of aromatic to aliphatic area (peak 1,620 cm -1 to 2,930 cm -1 ), varied across agro-ecological zones and farmers resource endowment, with respective interaction effects (p < 0.05) (Figure 2a-d). The highest (5.5%) and lowest (3.1%) peaks at 2,930 cm -1 were noted on fields of poor farmers in K and D, respectively. Similarly, fields of wealthy farmers had a larger peak area at 2,930 cm -1 than those of poor farmers in D (p < 0.05) (Figure 2a). In contrast, the highest (95.2%) and lowest (91.9%) values of relative peak area at 1,620 cm -1 peak were found in fields of poor farmers in D and K, respectively (p < 0.05) (Figure 2b). The highest relative peak area of 1,159 cm -1 was observed in K fields of both farm typologies, while the lowest was found in HD (p < 0.01) (Figure 2c). The highest and lowest SOC stability indices were calculated for fields of poor farmers in D and K, respectively (p < 0.001) (Figure 2d). In D, a larger index was noted in fields of poor compared with wealthy farmers (p < 0.05). Furthermore, significant positive correlations of pH and TOC with C-H aliphatic SOC (pH: r 2 = 0.39; TOC: r 2 = 0.51) were found, while negative relationships were calculated for C = C aromatic SOC (pH: r 2 = −0.39; TOC: r 2 = −0.47) (p < 0.001) (data not shown). Correlations between the stability index and TOC (r 2 = −0.45) and TN (r 2 = −0.24) (p < 0.001) were negative, while no correlation was found for soil pH.Farmers' indigenous knowledge on soil fertility agreed with 75% (eight out of 12 soil fertility indicators) of scientifically generated soil fertility indicators across agro-ecological zones (Tables 2 and 3). Soil colour as a soil fertility indicator for farmers suggested that black and brown soils were considered as fertile, while red soils were assessed to be less fertile soils. This was confirmed by laboratory analysis, that is black and brown soils had generally higher TC, TN, P av and pH than the red soils, except soil pH at HD (Table 2). The capability of farmers' indigenous knowledge to identify fertile and less fertile soils was further verified by a higher relative peak area of 1,159 cm -1 in less fertile fields; a similar trend was noted for the SOC stability index (p < 0.01) (Table 3).It was a key finding that the soil fertility status in the study region was determined by an inter-related effect of farmers' resource endowment (farm typology) and agro-ecological zone. This effect was most pronounced between the wealthy and poor farms located in the lowland (K) and highland (HD) The effect of resource endowment in the lowlands was explained by the better soil nutrient status (e.g., TN, K av ) in the fields of wealthy compared with poor farmers. It is a main advantage of wealthy farms to have a higher soil fertility status, as a result of extended fallowing, organic residue burning and higher livestock numbers (Corbeels et al., 2000;Tian et al., 2005;Haileslassie et al., 2006). These interventions provide sufficient resources to replenish the soil nutrient pool (Cobo et al., 2010;Haileslassie et al., 2007). With this, wealthy farmers also compensate the accelerated decomposition of organic resources by higher temperatures in the lowlands that generally increases the soil nutrient pool (Coûteaux et al., 2002) Even though poor farmers have a higher livestock density and may potentially provide more manure per area of land; these farmers commonly use livestock manure for cooking fuel rather than applying it to fields for fertilization purposes.The use of manure as fuel is essential for poor farmers as they do not have extra land to cultivate biomass for firewood production, unlike wealthy farmers.Apart from the obvious differences in the soil nutrient status in the lowlands, no clear effect of resource endowment on TC content and SOC quality was observed. This was explained with the fast decomposition of active SOC pools, which was, irrespective of the soil fertility management strategy of wealthy farmers, responsible for the pronounced nutrient release. Even though there was no difference between both farm typologies, a higher TC content was found in the warmer lowlands and mild midlands than in the colder highlands (Coûteaux et al., 2001;Du et al., 2014;Tian et al., 2016). This increased TC content might have resulted from maize-dominated cropping practices in the lowlands and midlands, where the low biochemical quality (high C/N ratio, lignin and polyphenol content) of respective crop residues enhanced the SOC pool (Wang et al., 2015). Irrespective of the typology classes in the low and medium altitude agro-ecological zones, it has been shown that the conversion of C derived from crop residues, such as maize, to SOC is generally lower in fields of poor farmers than those of wealthy farmers due to higher fertilization (Wang et al., 2015). This high potential of C stabilization was corroborated by the presence of recalcitrant SOC pools (i.e., C-O poly-alcoholic and ether groups). In the highlands, in contrast to the low-and midlands, there was a distinct difference in TC content, which was higher in the fields of the wealthier farmers. This was substantiated by the option of wealthy farmers to combine organic and inorganic fertilizer inputs, leading to an increase of C-H aliphatic SOC functional groups, but a decrease of C = C aromatic SOC functional groups. Accordingly, this management option created a higher SOC stability index (i.e., peak area ratio of 1,620:2,930) in the fields of poor farmers. The application of inorganic fertilizer resulted most likely in greater plant biomass production, providing additional inputs to accelerate the decomposition rate of roots and plant residues to produce more labile SOC pools (Blair et al., 2006). In contrast to the findings in the fields of wealthy farmers, pronounced C = C aromatic SOC functional groups along with a higher SOC stability index were found in the soils of poor farmers in the highland agro-ecological zone, indicating fewer organic inputs. Similar results were given by Demyan et al. (2012), who found in plots of the Bad Lauchstädt longterm field experiment (Germany) treated with both chemical and organic fertilizers for more than 100 years higher C-H aliphatic SOC groups than in plots receiving only farmyard manure. The higher labile SOC pool with a lower SOC stability index may be an indicator for high soil fertility as compared to higher C = C aromatic and high stability index. In contrast, C = C aromatic pools were shown to increase soil C stabilization (Haynes, 2005). It is acknowledged that the labile SOC pool can benefit important soil functions, including soil aggregate formation and nutrient supply as well as serve as essential microbial energy source (Ghani et al., 2003;Haynes, 2005;Kunlanit et al., 2020;Maia et al., 2007).This study confirmed the capability of farmers' indigenous knowledge to define the soil fertility status, a capacity not influenced by either agro-ecological zone or farm typology. The identification of soil fertility status based on farmers' indigenous knowledge is often in close agreement with soil chemical properties analysed in the laboratory (Huynh et al., 2020). Irrespective of their wealth status and geographic location, farmers confirmed their capacity to assess soil fertility variability using indigenous knowledge accumulated through generations of experience and consistent exchange through socio-cultural events (e.g., weddings and funerals) between lowland and highlands (Leta et al., 2018). Such knowledge transfer across agro-ecological zones may have been responsible for the common farmer perception that red soils are less fertile than black and brown soils.Farmers describe and classify their soils using a holistic approach and use relatively homogeneous soil classification indicators across agro-ecologies (Laekemariam et al., 2017). Accordingly, farmers have been using soil colour, soil texture, soil depth, topography and drainage, as well as crop performance as criteria to categorize their land into fertile and less fertile fields (Belachew & Abera, 2010;Corbeels et al., 2000;Karltun et al., 2013;Yeshaneh, 2015). In the low and midlands, a higher variability between fertile and less fertile fields was observed for soil pH and P av . Farmers considered red soils as less fertile and used this as an indicator for soil acidity (soil pH) (Laekemariam et al., 2017). The low P av values might have been a result of P fixation in acidic soils (Agumas et al., 2014). On the contrary, black soils were interpreted as fertile with high SOC and P av contents (Moody et al., 2008). Similarly, we detected higher TC and P av values in black than in red soils in the midlands and lowlands, respectively. Higher P av values in black than in red soils may have resulted from higher organic P cycling favoured by higher SOC and soil moisture content (Corbeels et al., 2000;Moritsuka et al., 2014). This might indicate that organic matter and soil mineralogy are the most important soil properties that govern soil colour (Poppiel et al., 2020).No difference between farm typologies was observed with respect to the identification of fertile and less fertile fields based on indigenous knowledge (Table S2), a likely result of the informal communication channels among social institutions: for example 'iddir' (indigenous and local self-help association), 'debo' (collective labour support group) and 'dado' (reciprocal labour sharing arrangement among farmers) (Leta et al., 2018). Even though farmers are generally limited to explain on a scientific basis why such differences in soil fertility exist, both wealthy and poor farmers have comparable indigenous knowledge to identify fertile and less fertile fields.Indigenous knowledge is generally used by farmers to design management strategies for site-specific soil fertility problems. Farmers in the lowlands, for example, fallow, burn organic residues and apply higher farmyard manure on fields perceived as fertile. Similarly, farmers in the highlands invest more inorganic fertilizer on their fertile fields than on those with lower fertility. This corroborates the fact that farmers are aware of the soil fertility status, whereby their indigenous knowledge can guide site-adapted ISFM interventions (Tittonell, Vanlauwe, Leffelaar, Shepherd, et al., 2005).This study verified that inter-related rather than individual effects of agro-ecological zones and farmers' resource endowment (farm typology) must be considered to explain soil fertility variability of smallholder farms across regions and wealth classes. Accordingly, it was inferred that prospective ISFM strategies must be niche-based, considering such contrasting but inter-related agro-ecological zones and farm typologies to reduce the inherent depletion of soil fertility across smallholder farms in the study region of Ethiopia. Moreover, across agro-ecological zones, farmers identified fertile and less fertile fields based on their indigenous knowledge, which was corroborated by the laboratory-based soil fertility survey. Hence, farmers' indigenous knowledge was verified as a valuable proxy for this local soil fertility survey. Significance levels: ns, not significant at p < 0.05; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.the International Institute for Tropical Agricultural (IITA) with its LegumeCHOICE project for funding this research. We also acknowledge Dr. Tesfaye Feyisa and Mr. Minlik Getaneh for their assistance during field data collection, Christian Brandt (PhD) for his support in preparation of study site map, as well as Mrs. Carolin Stahl for her technical support during soil analysis at the University of Hohenheim (Stuttgart, Germany)."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4151187104.json b/main/part_2/4151187104.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c8b1343ca65bd32933d0c7d46d845842b10a05f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4151187104.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ece947bfdb6d54a8cfc508dfa8c636e4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/374125c3-facf-4260-b9ad-dceb397abd27/retrieve","id":"1186778680"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b2ee8b03-590d-4143-864f-ddac5dcbf454","content":"Une croissance soutenue du secteur agricole sera nécessaire si l'Afrique veut stimuler la croissance économique pour réduire la pauvreté. Plus de 70% des pauvres africains -dont la majorité sont des femmes-travaillent dans l'agriculture. Les pauvres urbains dépensent plus de la moitié de leurs revenus pour acheter les aliments de base. Ainsi, l'agriculture présente plus de potientialités pour stimuler a la fois un accroissement de la production et de la productivité tout en augmentant les revenus de la majorité des pauvres du continent, ainsi qu'une amélioration des revenus réels des pauvres urbains par la réduction du coût des aliments de base. Les participants a la Conférence reconnaisssent aussi que la prospérité agricole stimule la demande de biens et services non agricoles, en favorisant des retombées positives de croissance dans autres secteurs de l'écomomie en augmentant les effets multiplicateurs de la croissance du PIB. Davantage de croissance agricole améliore la sécurité alimentaire nationale stimule la prospérité rurale et la création de richesses et de bien etre qui a leur tour aident a diminuer l'exode rural.La Conférence reconnait que les agriculteurs et décideurs africains ont réalisé une série de succès importants dans le domaine du développement agricole, bien qu'ils ne soient pas suffisamment nombreux pour répondre à la croissance démographique rapide. Beaucoup de ces succes existent depuis des decennies sans possibilités d'expansion. Le développement des variétés de manioc TMS (tropical manioc sélection) ont lancé deux décennies d'innovation dans la plupart des régions africaines. Le développement et la diffusion de variétés modernes à haut rendement de mais, à partir des années 60, ont transformé cette céréale en principale source de calories du continent. Les croisements des variétés africaines et asiatiques de riz ont permis aux riziculteurs africains de développer la variété de riz NERICA à haut rendement en cours de diffusion en Afrique de l'Ouest et du Centre. En outre les participants ont noté que au cours des derineres décennies les agriculteurs africains ont arraché des parts de marché d'exportation pour des produits agricoles de valeur tels le coton, le café, d'élevage et horticoles en direction de l'Europe et du Moyen et Extrême Orient.L'analyse des succès du passé suggèrent une contribution de trois ingrédients. D'abord les nouvelles technologies productives font baisser le coût de production et rendent l'agriculture africaine plus productive et plus rentable. Deuxièmement, un ciblage des marchés émergents. Troisièmement un engagement politique au plus haut niveau à soutenir l'agriculture. Une vision claire et un engagement politique fort se sont avérés essentiels, car se traduisant en un environnement favorable ainsi que par plus d'allocations budgétaires en faveur de l'agriculture, des institutions de soutien et infrastructures nécessaires.Pour l'avenir, des projections a moyen terme indiquent que l'opportunité immédiate la plus importante pour la croissance agricole reposera sur l'accroissement explosif des marchés internes et régionaux africains des denrées alimentaires. La flexibilité au ciblage des marchés de haute valeur et de niches d'exportation peut compléter ces derniers avec des opportunités de croissance externe. Les marchés domestiques et d'exportation offrent des opportunités de valeur ajoutée dans l'approvisionnement en intrants et des industries de transformation. L'abondance des ressources en Afrique peut soutenir ces gains, a condition que les gouvernements africains soient en mesure de créer un environnement politique favorable et fournir les biens publics nécessaires -tels les routes, l'énergie, les institutions légales et de recherche -que le secteur privé ne pourra fournir.La Conférence reconnait en outre qu'une agriculture africaine moderne doit voir en les agriculteurs des entrepreneurs cherchant à améliorer leurs revenus a travers l'acces au crédit et a la productivité -technologies innovatrices afin d'etre plus compétitifs dans les marchés émergents domestiques et d'exportation. En effet, les fermiers africains se sont montrés inventifs et pleins de potentiels de même qu'ils se sont montrés réceptifs aux opportunités. Les distributeurs d'intrants agricoles, ensemble avec les agro transformateurs et les réseaux de distribution constituent des liens vitaux entre les agriculteurs et les marches finaux des produits.Les pouvoirs publics doivent créer un environnement favorable à la transformation agricole et de l'agrobusiness. Un accès au foncier plus sur, un cadre légal solide, une politique macroéconomique stable et un soutien institutionnel effectivement fonctionnel fournissent une fondation nécessaire à la prospérité agricole. Toute fois les participants ont exprimé leurs préoccupations quant aux dégats du VIH/SIDA et des autres maladies débilitantes. Un accès harmonisé aux marchés sous-régionaux améliore les perspectives d'une croissance soutenue, particulièrement dans les marchés de denrées alimentaires émergents. Les conditions d'un commerce équitable et des prix équitables constituent des éléments nécessaires de ce système favorable d'incitation.Pareillement, un investissement public significatif sera nécessaire dans les routes rurales, l'électricité, et les autres infrastructures ainsi que dans la recherche et la vulgarisation agricole de nouvelles technologies plus productives. Des rendements des investissements publics dans la recherche et le développement agricole s'avèrent suffisamment élevées, aussi bien en Afrique qu'ailleurs. Pourtant l'Afrique en moyenne, a continué a sous investir dans les secteurs productifs clés alors que lors de la Révolution Verte asiatique les pays investissaient 15% de leurs budgets dans l'agriculture, les gouvernements africains aujourd'hui allouent seulement 6% en moyenne.De meme, la Conference reconnait que les investissements publics necessaires pour soutenir une croissance agricole rapide demanderont un appui significatif des gouvernements africains dans les allocations budgétaires en faveur de l'agriculture. Conscients de cet impératif, les Chefs d'Etat et de Gouvernement africains ont convenu au cours du Sommet de Maputo en juillet 2003, de faire de l'agriculture la première priorité et d'augmenter le budget national alloué à l'agriculture a 10% d'ici a 2008.La Conférence recommande que la réalisation des objectifs du PDDAA nécessitera des actions concertées à différents niveaux :A. Niveau UA/NEPAD:• Communiquer la Déclaration de Maputo à tous les partenaires, y compris les Gouvernements, les Ministeres competents, les Parlements, la Société Civile et le secteur privé.• Le Secretariat du NEPAD et la Commission de l'UA devraient renforcer le suivi de ces accords dont la Déclaration de Maputo pour tous les pays membres.• Rendre disponible un site Internet avec des informations en temps réel sur les cibles des dépenses, et les succes.• Harmoniser les définitions de l'agriculture et le total des dépenses. Soutenir l'initiative du NEPAD en matiere des depenses agricoles en controlant au sein des institutions gouvernementales les allocations et les transactions budgétaires nécessaires• Organiser des séminaires sous-régionaux réguliers en y associant les gouvernements, les parlements ainsi que les representants des organisations paysannnes.• S'approprier, formaliser et institutionnaliser immédiatement l'engagement de Maputo dans le processus budgétaire national. Préparer des Notes d'Information au Cabinet, fournir un briefing de haut niveau au gouvernement et aux institutions législatives ainsi que les autres parties prenantes. Intégrer la Déclaration de Maputo dans les Plan d'Action a moyen terme et les systèmes budgétaires• Améliorer la qualité des investissements agricoles • Développer des capacités internes a utiliser les allocations budgétaires de facon efficace.• Développer des systèmes comptables fiables et transparents • Initier les mécanismes nationaux d'évaluation par les pairs au travers desquels gouvernement, le législatif et la société civile peuvent suivre les progrès vers l'objectif fixé.• Impliquer et renforcer les capacités des organisations paysannes, de la société civile et autres groupes d'interets dans le suivi de la mise en oeuvre du programme et l'exécution des depenses budgétaires• Documenter et diffuser les exemples de succès en agriculture.• Rendre l'enseignement agricole et l'image de l'agriculteur plus attractifs.• Désigner les commissions parlementaires pour l'agriculture et secteurs affiliés chargées du suivi du progres dans la mise en oeuvre du PDDAA.• Vérifier annuellement la mise en oeuvre du PDDAA, y compris les progres vers la réalisation de la Déclaration de Maputo en examinant les allocations budgétaires annuelles et la dépense effective• Engager des dialogues sous-régionaux.• Sensibiliser les circonscriptions y compris les hommes, les jeunes, les femmes et les partis politiques de l'importance de l'agriculture et de l'augementation des investissements dans ce secteur.• Exiger des briefings de la part de l'Executif au Parlement sur toutes les initiatives liees a l'agriculture.• Suivre les efforts du gouvernement vers la réalisation de la Declaration de Maputo.• introduire les motions individuelles des membres dans le plaidoyer en faveur de la Declaration Maputo.• Les Parlementaires devraient jouer un role central dans la lutte contre le VIH/SIDA • Encourager les échanges d'expériences et l'apprentissage mutuel avec les autres parlementaires et les experts techniques.• Encourager les partenaires au développement a prioriser l'agriculture de nouveau et a fournir les contreparties afin de soutenir les gouvernements africains qui montrent un engagement en faveur du PDDAA.• Soutenir les efforts de renforcement des capacités des gouvernements, des parlements et des groupes parlementairesafricains.•Soutenir les forums régionaux et sous-régionaux sur l'agriculture.• Fournir l'appui technique requis pour des questions affectant la recherche agricole, le développement et le commerce.• Fournir les liens nécessaires entre les parlements des pays industrialisés et les décideurs politiques de façon a ce que les Africains puissent davantage communiquer sur les effets des politiques agricoles des pays industrialisés sur les économies africaines Nous pensons qu'avec l'engagement renouvellé des gouvernements africains, des gains significatifs sont possibles dans l'agriculture africaine et que ceci renforcera significativement les perspectives de croissance économiques et de réduction de pauvreté dans les prochaines décennies. Nous exhortons les organisateurs de cette conférence et tous les participants a jouer un rôle actif pour s'assurer de la réalisation des recommandations. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4154801386.json b/main/part_2/4154801386.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43123a0fdac24e5517760cc98a5fb3ec20683621 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4154801386.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"74f134e177d86d1e2a408094503dc807","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/faaa9ce4-eb0e-4a46-a6f2-3d83e83293af/retrieve","id":"-1878761198"},"keywords":["Service provider","two-and four-wheel tractor","sheller","transport","impact","smallholder farmers"],"sieverID":"d408a81a-8b3c-4cf1-a65f-0ce08ac1335f","content":"Unlocking the potential of smallholder agricultural productivity hinges on the pivotal role of mechanization, serving as the cornerstone to raise crop yield and improve livelihoods. However, evidence is thin on fit-for-purpose appropriate mechanization in the south of the Sahel. This study used a quantitative survey to understand the status of appropriate-scale mechanization in Zambia and Zimbabwe. In both countries, 50 service providers participated in the survey together with 210 farmers who used mechanization services and 219 farmers who did not. We find that farmers who used mechanization services had higher maize yield and higher household incomes. But there are nuances. First, mechanization service providers are older, predominantly male, and more educated. Second, the distributional effects show that hiring mechanization is associated with statistically significant higher outcomes in the 75 th and 95 th percentiles of income and yield. These results point to a need for structured promotion approaches that allow all farmer types to equally benefit from mechanization services. There is a need for more work on the economics of appropriate scale agricultural mechanization to further understand profitability and returns to investments.Mechanization is necessary to improve productivity and production efficiency of smallholder agriculture and for sustainable and resilient agricultural sectors. Agricultural mechanization refers to the use of machinery and equipment to either replace or assist manual labor in various agricultural operations across entire agri-food value chains from land preparation, planting, spraying, fertigation, harvesting, processing, and transportation of produce (Van Loon et al., 2020).Farm mechanization refers to the use of machines to perform farm operations like land clearing, land preparation, weeding, harvesting and post-harvest handling. It is restricted to operations that happen on the farm, while agricultural mechanization is broad and considers the use of machinery in entire agric-food value chains. Mechanizing agricultural operations streamlines tasks, leading to higher productivity and effectiveness.Embracing agricultural mechanization addresses labor constraints, improves production efficiencies, reduces production costs, enhances the timeliness and quality of farm operations, and reduces drudgery (Zhou & Ma, 2022). Machines perform tasks faster, with greater precision and on a larger scale compared to manual labor. Tractors, for instance, can plough fields more evenly and faster, while saving time and effort. Various machinery, such as planters, harvesters, and irrigation systems, streamline field activities, minimize wastage, and increase productivity with timely operations (Sayed et al., 2022). For example, planting, cultivating, and harvesting crops can be expedited with the use of appropriate machinery, enabling farmers to capitalize on favorable weather conditions to maximize crop yields. Mechanization empowers farmers to work on larger land areas and scale up operations (Liao et al., 2022;Takeshima et al., 2020;Wang et al., 2020).The ability to cover more ground efficiently allows for expanded production, improved market competitiveness, and enhanced profitability. Moreover, agricultural machinery facilitates precise operations, contributing to enhanced crop quality (Dhiman & Dhiman, 2015;Luo et al., 2016).Mechanization reduces the demand for manual labor, which can be advantageous in places where labor is scarce with higher wages (Gauchan & Shrestha, 2017). Following the Theory of Induced Innovations (Ruttan & Hayami, 1973), as labor becomes scarce or expensive, labor-saving options like mechanization take over labor-intensive or labor-using alternatives use of hand hoes. Such a switch frees farmers of physical exertion and allows them to utilize their resources more efficiently. In addition, mechanization can assist farmers in adapting to climate change (Sims & Kienzle, 2016). For example, irrigation can reduce the effects of droughts, while mechanized, planting and harvesting can optimize precise and timely agricultural production in shifting climatic conditions, increasing resilience, and lowering risks associated with weather fluctuations. Given its potential merits, agricultural mechanization has incredibly good political support to increase food production and productivity to meet growing demand. The support for agricultural mechanization is highest in Africa where there is a greater need to increase food production to feed a growing population. In support of the current drive towards mechanization, nascent evidence shows that demand for mechanization is rising in Malawi (Tufa et al., 2023), in Zambia and Zimbabwe (Ngoma et al., 2023) and that investments in mechanization raise productivity (Omulo et al., 2022). In addition, farmers that access mechanization services tend to have better income earning opportunities due to increased land under cultivation (Adu-Baffour et al., 2019). Despite some positives, there is a need to bolster the evidence to support the current drive to mechanize smallholder agriculture in Africa The drive to mechanize African agriculture heightens, albeit with some gaps in our understanding of the economics of appropriate scale mechanization. Yet, this is the bottom line used by farmers when deciding whether to adopt mechanization or not. In deciding whether to adopt mechanization, farmers weigh the costs and benefits of various technologies and machinery. In doing so, farmers choose where it makes the most sense to invest to maximize returns.While it is believed in general that mechanization can improve agricultural production efficiency and productivity (Kirui, 2019;Sampene et al., 2022), it is still unclear how these effects vary across different farmer groups and different mechanization value chain actors such as: service providers, farmers that received mechanization services etc. The availability of labor and the dynamics of the agriculture industry are critical in determining the profitability of mechanization.Understanding labor market dynamics assists farmers in determining whether mechanization is a viable option in situations with limited labor availability and high wages. Further, understanding the economic consequences of mechanization helps policymakers and stakeholders in developing effective policies to manage anticipated labor market shifts. It also enables stakeholders to make informed decisions, optimize resource allocation, and build supportive policies for sustainable agricultural development.Despite the potential for agricultural mechanization, its uptake remains limited and evidence of its impact among smallholders remains scanty. There is a lack of comprehensive understanding of the business case for mechanization and its impacts on livelihoods among smallholder farmers.This study was designed to contribute towards filling these gaps using case studies from Zambia and Zimbabwe. The primary objective of the study was to assess the business case of mechanization for service providers and the impacts of mechanization on productivity and livelihoods for farmers who accessed mechanization services. Specifically, the study assessed the (i) kinds of services hired out by whom and when, and (ii) impacts of mechanization on livelihoods and land productivity. We hypothesized that: (i) there is no significant increase in yields for smallholder farmers who use mechanization compared to those who do not utilize mechanization services; (ii) smallholder farmers adopting mechanization do not experience a notable rise in income when compared to those relying solely on manual labor; and that (iii) factors such as farm size, crop type, rural wages, access to credit, and training opportunities do not play a significant role in influencing the decisions of smallholder farmers to adopt appropriate-scale mechanization in Zambia.Fieldwork was done between June and August 2023 in both Zambia and Zimbabwe. Sampling in both countries included a blend of purposive and simple random sampling methods. In Zambia, the survey was conducted in June 2023 in Mazabuka and Monze districts in the Southern province; Chipata, Lundazi, and Sinda districts in the Eastern province; and in Senga Hill and Mbala districts in Northern Province. Sampling was multistage, where the initial stage involved purposefully selecting all three provinces, seven districts and eleven camps where CIMMYT has been implementing mechanization activities through the service provider model since 2020. At the time of the survey, there were 20 mechanization service providers across these locations.Within each province, respondents were selected randomly across four categories: individual mechanization service providers, group/cooperative service providers, farmers who accessed mechanization services, and other farmers who did not access mechanization services. Sampling frames for each category were drawn from up-to-date lists of mechanization service providers and farmers they serviced, and from the Ministry of Agriculture for other farmers. In total, 227 respondents were selected across the four categories: fifteen individual mechanization service providers; two group/cooperative service providers; 105 farmers who accessed mechanization services; and 105 farmers who did not access mechanization services. To ensure representation, five individual mechanization service providers were randomly sampled from each province. For both the treatment and control groups, an equal number of farmers who accessed mechanization services and those who did not were randomly sampled in Eastern, Northern, and Southern provinces. Group/cooperative-based mechanization services are not prevalent in most intervention districts; thus, interviews were conducted with only one group in Mbala district and one in Lundazi district.In Zimbabwe, fieldwork was done in June 2023 in Shamva, Bindura, Makonde, and Masvingo districts where CIMMYT has implemented mechanization activities through the service provider model since 2020. Among these districts, there were forty-two service providers (SPs), with Masvingo having the highest at 32, and the remaining eight were distributed across Shamva (2), Bindura (2), and Makonde (4). Thirty-three (33) SPs were randomly selected without consideration of the district or ward of origin. Additionally, 24 farmers who utilized mechanization services from SPs and 24 farmers who did not use mechanization services, residing in villages adjacent to the SPs, were randomly selected per district. Interviews were conducted with irrigation schemes, cooperatives, or groups providing mechanization services to farmers. Overall, two groups were interviewed in Shamva, four in Masvingo, one each in Bindura and Makonde, respectively. The overall sample in Zimbabwe was 252, categorized as follows: thirty-one individual SPs, two groups, 105 farmers who accessed and used mechanization services from SPs, and 114 farmers who did not use mechanization services (Table 1). Figure 1 shows the spatial locations of households interviewed. We used two analytical approaches in this paper. First, we used a probit model to assess drivers of farmers' decisions to adopt mechanization or to use mechanization services. The dependent variable for this estimation is a binary variable that takes a value of 1 if a farmer used mechanization services for a given activity. Second, we used the instrumental variable conditional quantile treatment effect (IVQTE) of Firpo, Fortin, and Lemieux (2009). The outcome variables of interest are yield and income, used as livelihood indicators. Studying the distributional impacts beyond the mean is important because farmers are heterogeneous and means do not capture the spread.This section provides key descriptive statistics about the sample and explores specific statistical distinctions in socioeconomic and demographic attributes between those who used mechanization services (treatment) and those who did not (control). Summary statistics for service providers are provided in Table 2. Most (over 90%) of the fifty (50) service providers interviewed were male heads of households aged 55 years on average. SPs are well educated having completed 13 years of formal education and with an average household size of 7 members. SPs in Zambia had larger farms averaging 19 hectares compared to 3 ha for SPs in Zimbabwe. Farmers who access mechanization services and those who did not are similar in both Zambia and Zimbabwe (Table 3 and 4). The only differences are that farmers who accessed mechanization services in Zambia were more educated and a larger proportion was polygamously married.Further, farmers that accessed mechanization had larger land holdings at 20 hectares compared to 12 hectares among those who did not access mechanization. In Zimbabwe, farmers who accessed mechanization services were significantly older at 56 years compared to those who did not access mechanization services (Table 4). We do find any other statistically significant differences between treatment and control in terms of other covariates. In general, service providers had lived in their current villages for at least 30 years by the time of the survey in June 2023. This is much longer than for farmers who accessed mechanization services and those who did not access the mechanization service (Table 5). We find no major differences between those who hired mechanization and those that did not hire in terms of number of relatives and non-relatives that can be relied upon within and outside the villages. A larger proportion of farmers who hired mechanization services had relatives in leadership positions compared to farmers who did not hire mechanization. As would be expected, more than 90% of service providers and more than 70% of farmers that accessed mechanization services accessed advice on mechanization in both Zambia and Zimbabwe. Shelling and threshing, whether based on two-wheel tractor or standalone engines, are most sought after from April to September, with significant peaks between May and July as more farmers participate in the marketing season by selling their produce. There is consistently high demand for transportation using two-wheel tractors throughout the year, with peak periods observed from March to August, which correspond to harvest and postharvest times. Noteworthy peaks for transportation using motorcycles and trucks are observed consistently throughout the year. These patterns are similar across Zambia and Zimbabwe. In addition, results show that transportation using trucks and oxcarts, spraying with boom sprayers, and ripping and seeding using animal draft power show inconsistent demand during the year.Land preparation as described above costs about $27 and $50 per hectare in Zambia and Zimbabwe, respectively (Figure 4). Shelling costs about $0.05 and $0.25 per 10 kg while transport costs about $9 per 10 km radius in the survey areas in the two countries. There are differences between the different constituents. For example, ripping and seeding with a four-wheel tractor cost more than doing the same operations using animal draft power or a two-wheel tractor. This is as expected given the differences in fuel required to operate a two-wheel tractor compared to a fourwheel tractor for a given land unit. Overall, mechanization service prices in Zimbabwe are higher than those in Zambia, reflecting a higher willingness to pay for these services. This is in line with findings in Ngoma et al. (2023) suggesting that farmers in Zimbabwe were willing to pay more for different two-wheel tractor-based services than those in Zambia. While the main intention of this section was to elaborate on the profitability of the SP model, the data collected do not permit such an analysis at this stage. As a precursor to the robust econometric assessments, we first compared maize yield among farmers that hired and those that did not hire mechanization services. Farmers who hired mechanization services had significantly higher average maize yield at 2.9 tons compared to 1.7 tons among those who did not hire in Zambia (Figure 5, left panel). We find comparable results in Zimbabwe that farmers who hired mechanization services had higher maize yield than those who did not (1.4 tons vs 1.2 tons), even if the difference is not statistically significant.In terms of income, farmers who hired mechanization services had higher household incomes than those who did not hire in both Zambia and Zimbabwe (Figure 5, right panel). Household income refers to income from all observed sources (salary, wage, business, remittance, agriculture etc.) over one year. On average, farmers who hired mechanization services earned $2,400 compared to $1,200 household income per year in Zambia. In Zimbabwe, the differences are smaller at $1,700for those who hired and $1,400 for those who did not hire. Social capital, labor shortage proxied by hiring labor and rising land prices are associated with significantly higher probabilities of hiring mechanization services (Table 6). Social capital, labor shortages, and rising land prices are associated with 11%, 20% and 15% higher probabilities of hiring mechanization. The age of the household head is used as a proxy for experience, and older household heads are more and less likely to use mechanization services Zimbabwe with the opposite being the case in Zambia (Table 6). We measured livelihoods using household income and maize yield. Without controlling for the endogeneity of access to machinery, we find some positive distributional effects. For the full sample, using mechanization was associated with significantly higher incomes and maize yield in the 75 th and 95 th percentiles (Table 7). In each case, the effect is larger in the 95 th percentile than in the 75 th percentile, except for maize yield in some instances, and the effects is larger for household income than for maize yield. For example, using mechanization is associated with 74% -145% more household income and 30 -32 % higher maize yield. While the descriptive resultsshowed that farmers that used mechanization services had higher incomes and maize yield, multivariate results show that these effects are only significant for farmers in the higher end of the distribution. Notes: T-statistics in parentheses: *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 We find differences at sub-country level with the positive effects reflected in the pooled sample only replicated in the Zambia sub-sample (Table 8) and not in the Zimbabwe sub-sample (Table 9). Suffice to mention here these sub-national results are based on small samples and as such, should be interpreted with caution. The study shades light on the status of appropriate-scale mechanization services being offered to smallholder farmers in Zambia and Zimbabwe in areas where CIMMYT is implementing mechanization activities. Several highlights emerge. First, there is demand for land preparation, shelling (threshing) and transport mechanization services in Zambia and Zimbabwe. More than 60% of mechanization service providers hired out land preparation, shelling (threshing) and transportation services to farmers in their communities both in Zambia and Zimbabwe. However, the results show that there are disparities in demand times among different mechanization services in both Zambia and Zimbabwe. For example, shelling services are at their peak around May -July after harvesting while land preparation services are at their peak at the beginning of the season around November to December. The disparities in demand for mechanization based on seasons as depicted in the hiring calendars in Zambia and Zimbabwe highlight the complicated preferences for specific mechanization services, which correspond to distinct periods of increased demand connected with various agricultural operations throughout the year. The demand reflected in this study is in line with findings from previous studies in Zambia and Zimbabwe (Ngoma et al., 2023),Malawi (Tufa et al., 2023) and in Tanzania for shelling services (Kotu et al., 2023).Second, this study demonstrates that mechanization service providers are highly educated, having completed at least 13 years of formal education. As expected, farmers who hired mechanization services tend to possess higher levels of education compared to those who did not. This correlation between education and access to mechanization services aligns with the findings of Tufa et al (2023), who found that the educational attainment of the household head significantly influences the likelihood of farmers adopting mechanized land preparation services in Malawi and Ngoma et al (2023), who found that education is associated with a higher willingness to pay for direct seeding in Zambia and Zimbabwe.Third, this study shows that factors such as farm size (land ownership) play a significant role in influencing smallholder farmers' decisions to adopt appropriate-scale mechanization in Zimbabwe. This is in line with results by Kirui (2019) and Chapoto et al. (2014) that show a positive relationship between large farm size and adoption of agricultural mechanization services.However, social capital, labor shortage (as measured by hiring labor) and rising prices land prices increase the likelihood of the farmer hiring mechanization services. These results confirm the prediction of the induced innovation theory which suggests that cheaper factors tend to replace more expensive ones. As land and labor becomes expensive, intensification and labor-saving options such as mechanization become attractive. The contrasting findings on age are as expected because the age of the household head is used as a proxy for experience. In Zambia, where small scale mechanization is more recent, age is associated with reduced probability of hiring mechanization compared to Zimbabwe where farmers have more experience with small-scale mechanization and this increases the likelihood of hiring mechanization services in that country.Fourth, our findings refute our initial hypothesis that there is no significant increase in yields for smallholder farmers who use mechanization compared to those who do not, as well as our second hypothesis that smallholder farmers who use mechanization do not experience a significant increase in income when compared to those who rely solely on manual labor. The findings show that farmers who used mechanization services had higher maize yields and income compared to those that did not both in Zambia and Zimbabwe. These findings are similar with earlier research that have demonstrated that mechanization among smallholder farmers enhances yields, productivity, and creates profitable prospects for farmers (Adu-Baffour et al., 2019;Hamilton et al., 2022;Paudel et al., 2019;Peng et al., 2022). The nuance that these findings add is to show the distributional effects, where these effects are only statistically significant in the higher end of the income and yield percentiles. These results point to a need for structured promotion approaches that allow all farmer types to benefit from mechanization services.Fifth, prices for mechanization services are more on the higher side in Zimbabwe compared to Zambia. For example, land preparation costs about $50 per hectare in Zimbabwe while the same costs about $27 per hectare in Zambia and shelling costs about $0.05 per 10 kg in Zambia and $0.25 per 10 kg in Zimbabwe. It is important to note that the differences in currencies used in the two countries could be a key factor in why prices for mechanization services between the two countries are different as Zimbabwe uses the US$ while Zambia uses the Zambian Kwacha (ZMW) which has depreciated against the US$ in the recent past. In general, higher prices in this paper are in line with Ngoma et al (2023) who found that farmers in Zimbabwe were willing to pay more for different mechanization services compared to those in Zambia.In sum, our findings add to the growing evidence base that support agricultural mechanization's capacity to increase agricultural productivity and sustainably intensify agriculture among smallholders in Zambia and Zimbabwe and can guide evidence-based policies and actions targeted at enhancing food security, poverty eradication and agricultural development.Unlocking the potential of smallholder agricultural productivity hinges on the pivotal role of mechanization, serving as the cornerstone in increasing yield and steering the trajectory toward export oriented agricultural development. This study used a quantitative survey to understand the status of appropriate-scale mechanization in Zambia and Zimbabwe. In both countries, 50 service providers participated in the survey together with 210 farmers who used mechanization services and 219 farmers who did not.This study underscores the distinctive characteristics of mechanization service providers (SPs), predominantly male heads of households, 55 years on average, highly educated, and own relatively larger farms, averaging 19 hectares in Zambia and 3 hectares in Zimbabwe. The spectrum of services offered by these providers varies, with transportation services ranking highest, followed by shelling and land preparation. The fluctuating demand for specific services across the season mirrors peaks aligned with critical agricultural activities such as land preparation, shelling, and transportation, further emphasizing the relevance of mechanization during these pivotal farming periods.The findings from this study suggest that integrating smallholder mechanization holds significant promise in improving agricultural productivity, fostering income generation, and promoting longterm agricultural intensification. In addition, this study adds valuable insights for agricultural policymakers, researchers, and development practitioners, contributing to the growing reservoir of knowledge on the transformative potential of mechanization in smallholder agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. As a result, evidence-based policies and interventions derived from this study can help contribute to improving regional food security and promote sustainable agricultural development.Because if the data challenges encountered, there is need to implement an effective monitoring and evaluation system to continually analyze the impact of mechanization services on the productivity and income of smallholder farmers. Such a system would aid policymakers and stakeholders in making informed decisions and improvements to effectively support the sector.Policymakers should consider formulating policies aimed at fostering the growth of smallholder mechanization. This may encompass incentives for service providers and adopters through for example, some credit schemes and market access arrangements for value chain actors including end users, service providers and manufacturers. This can be complemented with regulatory frameworks ensuring fair competition and initiatives to overcome any barriers hindering widespread mechanization adoption.There is scope for more work on the economics of appropriate scale agricultural mechanization to further understand profitability and returns to investments. While we find positive indications in this study on mechanization demand and its positive relationship with yield and income, there is need to evaluate the economics of different mechanization services and models beyond the areas covered in this study to allow for a broader understanding of costs and returns on mechanization services in Zambia and Zimbabwe."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4160007386.json b/main/part_2/4160007386.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a93a3b0269a229237170f905f1b76e06a8ade7a --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4160007386.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"51745a7f1af95e71e4e720c01ac08b55","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/719773c5-8c07-43f1-91df-c079213d0fae/retrieve","id":"-67628862"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"61361685-4e4a-44c2-9125-1970198d1ccb","content":"Setting the context and information sharing Information Sharing: Key issues ICRISAT, presented by Farid Waliyar  How can the four different interventions (host resistance, cultural practices, bio-control agents, andpre-and post-harvesting technologies) be combined into single packages that are region specific and cost variable (\"no cost\", low cost, and high cost)?  We need more research on post-harvest techniques, such as drying, and how to promote it to farmers.  Are the key purposes for diagnostics being met?  How can we equip others who are working in the areas of technology transfer and market development?  How will we facilitate the transfer of agriculture technology?  How will we evaluate our programs?  What will the data management and sharing strategy and policy look like? IITA, presented by Ranajit Bandyopadhyay  Do we have research covering parts of the value chain relevant to nutrition and health?  What are the risk management tradeoffs in terms of the tolerable levels of aflatoxins for humans? In Kenya, for example, it has not been adequately examined.  What is the environmental impact of aflasafe™ and is there enough supporting evidence?  USAID is working on a regional license; what can we do to facilitate the process?  Are there any and/or is there a need for a long-term ecology study of aflasafe™ in Africa?CIMMYT, presented by George Mahuku  Should the scope of mycotoxin research include fumonisins?  Communicating a simple message to policy makers and implementers will be important. Just as often occurs in the communication of nutritional information, we do not want to confuse people or appear to give conflicting guidance.Participants from CGIAR research programs (CRPs) and partner research groups met for two days to share current activities and outputs related to mycotoxin research and to plan how these different activities might work together across the different CRPs and CGIAR research centers. The list of participants is included in the Annex.Each of the centers and partners provided presentations on their current mycotoxin research activities, issues they are facing, and the group discussed how these can fit together. The key issues as presented and brought up in discussion are summarized below by center/project. There is enough existing prevalence data for Kenya to know aflatoxin is an issue, so how much more prevalence data needs to be collected?  Other data should be used to inform these models and avoid duplication of efforts.-Ranajit has aflatoxin data for several hundred sites in Kenya and Tanzania and they are willing to share with BecA. -They have grain samples from their work in Tanzania that they are also willing to share.  What issues are we missing in terms of diagnostics?-What are the practicalities of the models for farmers? What's a short-term solution? -Models would provide guidance on suitability -performance of different hybrids in different conditions -rather than prediction.  Toxin contamination is so variable, so how useful will the models be?-Key: have as many sites as possible (HarvestChoice -600 farms/country) -Next step: longitudinal study across several seasons and years.-BecA is confident that even after the first year, they can identify risk areas.  Data like what BecA is generating will be relevant to an upcoming CGIAR meeting on data and knowledge management strategies. There are five research activities within three priority areas for this subcomponent. Four are managed by ILRI, but the fifth area on mycotoxins is still under development.  How will mycotoxins work as a research program and what types of activities fit? A4NH/Food Safety and Nutrition in Value Chains, Laurian Unnevehr  A new issue that hasn't been looked at through a value chain framework is examining how we lose nutritional value as a food product moves through the value chain.  Some key commodities (fruits and vegetables) are noticeably absent from the current activities on nutrition and food safety in value chains.A4NH/RCT on aflatoxin and child stunting, Nouhoum Traore  Should A4NH pursue a similar study in Nigeria next year? It could be a good comparison study to the previous work on groundnuts in Mali. There is a possible linkage to the Millennium Villages Project in Nigeria; they are collecting a lot of nutritional data. Considerations for the study design  Talk to Kitty Cardwell at USDA about her study in West Africa and the dietary intake data she collected. This study in West Africa compared three exposure zones and then three villages within each zone.  Several ethical considerations were raised about randomizing at the household level and community reaction to maize swapping.  Screening the baseline health status of the children will be important.  There was a similar study conducted in India with a number of political and ethical issues.  If breast milk is tested and it exceeds maximum levels, then there's an obligation to treat and this will have study implications. Same could be said with the levels of aflatoxin in households.Participants started from a list of key mycotoxin research areas in the CGIAR and considered how A4NH could best add value. Three major areas were selected based on their potential to be used as platforms for other research studies and to harmonize existing efforts within the CGIAR system.  There are a number of identified burdens of mycotoxins, including but not limited to:-poor human health -economic costs of illness and economic costs of lost agricultural assets -lost opportunities  Risk is the probability of negative impact on human health combined with the severity.  Before calculating risk, you need to calculate hazards. We need dietary data (exposure assessment) stratified by age groups, gender, HIV status in order to characterize the degree of risk from \"farm to fork.\"  We also must consider whether the risk has been described quantitatively or qualitatively.Risk to Human Health  Known and unknown impacts on human health -Liver cancer -Malnutrition -childhood stunting -Other diseases -immune suppression, diarrheal diseases  Currently available consumption data is inadequate for Sub-Saharan Africa, it may be better in Latin America and Southeast Asia. We need to understand the hazards related to consumption. Normally presented in terms of DALYs; more research needed in this area to demonstrate to policy-makers the financial burden of ignoring the problem.Agriculture-Related Economic Costs  It would be challenging to separate the costs due to aflatoxins and the rest (insects, drought)  There are trade losses that have to be considered.  We need to identify control points, in order to determine where will we have the most impact and what are the alternatives for the smallholder (in terms of feasibility, costs, acceptability)Data collection  Provide advice on existing data collection efforts to add more consumption questions/modules.  DHS would be a great start -USAID missions fund the DHS and has an opportunity to look at tools and request additional questions/modules; Francesca has initiated dialogue with DHS to get serum aflatoxin added to the DHS, which would provide global coverage data.  Conduct a data collection workshop on nutritional methods for collecting consumption data. Data  Compile data that has already been collected; CGIAR's data is mainly on the agriculture side.  Develop strategies to share data effectively.  Develop a shared database on household consumption data. PACA could host it and promote it;A4NH would have to lead development/management. We have a strong background/capacity in diagnostics in the agriculture sector. Key issues are the high cost and developing diagnostics that are fit for our purposes. Convene an expert group on mycotoxins to develop a broad risk framework that could be used to facilitate the discussion between agriculture and health to work out the risks, modeled after the WHO FERG's (Foodborne Expert Reference Group).  Collaborate with CRP on Maize on their upcoming workshop on biocontrol; add a health component.  Ask other centers to share project information on projects with health risk components. Target countries with growing industries in mycotoxin-vulnerable livestock species (poultry)  Start with the countries with demonstrated interest (Kenya, Tanzania) and use experience there as leverage within the region and beyond.  Focus today has been on Africa; we will need a separate plan for Asia. PK Joshi (IFPRI), B.M.Prasanna (CIMMYT), and Ranajit (IITA) will follow-up.Overview of the value chain assessment framework  Comes from a business strategy framework.  It describes the process of mapping the activities from inputs  production  processing  storage  consumption and the actors, economic transactions, and governance within the system. Value chain framework provides a tool for integrating analysis of the economic and technology elements present in an agriculture value chain. IITA and Nestle -Used using maize in the production of infant foods, but made a concerted effort that the poor quality maize was not left behind for household consumption.  We're missing information on the link between nutritional quality/food safety along the value chain and willingness to pay.  Public-private partnerships are essential, so how do we form more and more strategically?  For standards, we need to focus on the private sector because it's quicker. Get them the right diagnostics so they can test. What's the cost of the tests and are they practical? Testing becomes frustrating for the producers because such a high % of their supply cannot meet standards and they have no alternative markets (what about the clays/animal feeds).  Clay binding may be worth testing. There's a current test -as a treatment -in Ghana. It is considered a food additive and may be on the GRAS (Generally Regarded as Safe) list.-What about when binding is constrained by poor quality? -There are some human health concerns -in Asia and parts of Africa, pregnant women have been known to eat this clay.  Is adapting HACCP for risk assessment a good model?Policy and advocacy  There are emerging technologies (clay, blanching) that can be used to mitigate risks.Policymakers and the development community would benefit from a background paper that reviews the technology portfolio, followed by a workshop to integrate those technologies.  Issue an innovation challenge for promising technologies along the value chain. Peter Cottey, USDA, could advise us. Description of both health impact and economic impact is key. IFPRI can provide modeling capabilities, which may provide compelling evidence for investment in addressing the problem.  Consider more market experiments to determine consumer willingness to pay for high quality and safe foods.-IITA has some WTP data from West Africa (Dr. Coulibaly) for shea nut butter and cashew nut. The private sector has experience in adapting quality control standards to real-world situations vs. internationally established standards (i.e., CODEX). A multiple authored white paper on lessons learned from the private sector on this issue would be valuable. Consumers may not be aware of aflatoxin risks along the value chain. We need to understand the best way to provide information, motivate behavior change, and demonstrate the value of proven interventions, to address both on-farm consumption and consumption through formal markets. This is a research gap. Establish a working group on value chains as a vehicle for information-sharing across centers.  Identify a center contact person who would serve as the go-to person on quality and safety issues in value chains.There are two larger types of issues: (1) practical issues of turning it into a product and (2) issues of pushing it to scale. Six groups of issues are outlined below and the challenges and opportunities were presented together. Who owns the strains?  How do we have access them?  Who owns the technology?  AATF is involved; they are a good partner for IP issues /public availability.Currently IITA's work is limited to countries where funding is available and so only country strains are in development; the goal is to develop regional strains.  Collection needs to increase. Gaps in countries (Uganda, Burundi, Malawi) need to be filled in order to develop a regional strain.  A regional harmonization of registration protocols could speed this process. There are delivery issues, specifically, how can we use private companies to help with delivery and keep it accessible to the poor?  How do we utilize public-private partnerships strategically to scale-up?  ICRISAT has a transfer of technology platform and IITA is using that model for aflasafe™. They never give 100% of the technology to a single company; they have the choice to share it across different companies written into the licensing agreement.  Funding from the G-20 AgResults initiative has helped in working out production-side issues.Ranajit will share this project document with the team.  We need health impact studies, but this will take some time.For example, what does 70% reduction in pre-harvest mean for human exposure? -We could model it using scenarios.-We could make some ex ante assumptions or use expert opinion in models.Feed the Future might be a potential resource to do an initial study and identify the weaknesses, which could later be used to build a risk assessment model.  Examination of unintended consequences -Basic due diligence has been done on aflasafe™, but some basic monitoring -not detailed biological sampling -of workers and consumers along the value chain might prove valuable. Some areas of exploration: -Health consequences for people working in the fields -Health consequences for storage facility workers -IITA conducted a 2-year study to compare spores in treated and untreated fields and found no different in the number of spores; the percent of toxigenic spores was lower in the treated fields. -Another study conducted in India, not by IITA, found very serious impact on human health.  Francesca is aware of a CDC proposed project to explore the correlation between commodity contamination level and serum aflatoxin and maybe other health factors.  Could we add something to the Community Connector?Are there plans to expand biocontrol efforts to other mycotoxins or other species?Mycotoxins in animal health and links to human health  This is not being addressed by other CRPs, so interest expressed in coordinating with the CRP on Livestock and Fish.  Is this a public vs a private good? -Would it benefit the livestock sector (private good) or smallholders (public good)? Concluded, this will not be a priority area of focus in the mycotoxin portfolio for A4NH. It does seem like aflatoxin would be a strategic focus for the CRP on Livestock and Fish, particularly for poultry.Building a strategic partnership with PACA  Two different white papers have been identified as opportunities in today's discussion, should we use PACA to help with delivery and dissemination? -The process to get PACA's endorsement of the papers could be a very slow.  CGIAR should manage the database, but PACA could promote it.  There's an upcoming launch on October 31 and paper on aflatoxins prepared by Abt Associates will be distributed to ministers. Ranajit will do the main presentation to the ministers and A4NH will be a part of this presentation.Data and knowledge management system -key questions to keep in mind  We need an inventory of what we have now.-How can what we have now be shared?  How do we encourage/facilitate communication flow? -TeamSpace is not accessible to everyone?  The CRP on Policies, Institutions and Markets is committed to having a data platform. We'll tack on nutrition/health to that platform. Amanda is staying in touch with those people.  Data quality is also an issue.-On the health and nutrition side, that's where we need to make a contribution to our national partners. -No standardized method of sampling or tools or report the quality of the methods.-It would be helpful to put the data in a data warehouse with comments on validity.  Everyone was encouraged to provide data contacts to Amanda. How do we move forward on diagnostics? -Jagger may coordinate this effort unless we hear otherwise. Send contacts to him.  We could identify companies involved who are interested in reducing their costs.-George will start working on compiling this list."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4164997007.json b/main/part_2/4164997007.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ddf57d38a4fe96f1c7cbbf3ff319a450dc90452 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4164997007.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0691d8372ec173c5f8502fd9485b7384","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/350fb9cf-3391-42ac-932a-b6866f97e150/retrieve","id":"1287260647"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e30ffd46-be27-4ee5-8027-235e8ee48e26","content":"Links to the Strategic Results Framework: Sub-IDOs:• Adoption of CGIAR materials with enhanced genetic gains "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4165394604.json b/main/part_2/4165394604.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..183f07a8eb53e4a7e01e90ad71dd6ff29925e5f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4165394604.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a08c13dcee7e8ade421df0df47e40a20","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/51378239-f7e6-46f7-b8f1-3a651fafe4af/content","id":"543830988"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"44678963-ef92-45eb-b922-2423f5722ae1","content":"Coastal systems are facing natural and human-driven change coupled with a rising population. With increasing shifts in socioecological conditions during the past several decades, it is important to understand how socioecological drivers at different hierarchical levels: -micro, -meso, and -macro affect coastal farming systems, which play a crucial role in the livelihoods of coastal dwellers. Mixed rice-livestock-aquaculture farming in Southern Bangladesh exemplifies the rapid change occurring in many of the world's coastal farming systems in response to these drivers. We used panel data observations from the above study area and modeled trajectories of farm typologies, and the impact of multi-level socioecological drivers by a novel approach. Our approach integrates: (1) a well-articulated conceptual frame of change observed using (2) a temporal view of the potential drivers, change process and farm type outcomes, with the twenty years panel data of 502 households that is analyzed by means of (3) multivariate statistics in conjunction with panel data models that operationalize the conceptual frame. Our approach allows (a) estimating dynamic effects over time that typically cannot be estimated in a cross-sectional data set, (b) distinguishing between time-invariant fixed and time dependent random effects of multi-level socioecological drivers, and (c) controlling for omitted variables to a certain extent. Considering farming systems both within and outside of polder embankment systems intended to protect against oceanic water intrusion, we found a gradual shift from heterogeneous, rice-livestock farm types to more homogenous farms with less livestock and more off-farm activities. Micro-level factors including farm plot fragmentation, farmers' experience in cropping, machinery, salinity and soil fertility were influencing changes in farming systems. Meso-level factors including markets, road infrastructure, labor availability, access to extension and land tenure also affect the trajectory of farming systems change. Among macro-level drivers, increasing population density positively and significantly influenced cropping intensity among farms outside polder systems. Within polders, a positive but non-significant trend was observed for the influence of population density on cropping intensity. Our data also indicate negative and significant influence of cyclonic storms on cropping intensity over time in both areas. Our results underscore the importance of accounting for multiple levels of socioecological drivers of change when developing appropriate policy options for sustainable development in South Asia's coastal farming systems.Alongside a range of ecosystem services and economic benefits (Martinez et al., 2007), coastal systems provide multiple opportunities for diverse farm enterprises that integrate crops, livestock and aquaculture. Rural farmers in tropical coastal deltas are however highly vulnerable to global environmental change (Krupnik et al., 2015;Ishtiaque et al., 2017). More than 400 million people in South Asia who live in coastal areas are experiencing significant changes in rural economies, population density, agricultural practices, and climate that affect their livelihoods (UNISDR-UNDP, 2012). Farmers in coastal zones are disproportionately vulnerable to flooding, coastal erosion, soil and water salinity, and have high sensitivity to climate change and environmental shocks (Ali and El-Magd, 2016;Krupnik et al., 2015). Poised at the interface of multiple socioecological drivers, including biophysical and socioeconomic factors of both natural and anthropogenic origin, the coastal farming systems are undergoing rapid change. With increasing shifts in agroecological conditions during the past several decades, it is important to understand how socioecological drivers at different hierarchical levels: -micro (e.g., household), -meso (e.g., institutions), -macro (e.g., population) affect coastal farming systems, which play a crucial role in the livelihoods of coastal dwellers.Coastal farming systems comprise of population of individual farms organized by their crop, livestock and aquacultural components, and that have similar resource bases and livelihood patterns for which similar development interventions may be appropriate (Dixon et al., 2001). Understanding past and present agricultural diversity, dynamics, and trajectories of change is crucial to inform policies aimed at meeting Sustainable Development Goals (Valbuena et al., 2015;Domingues et al., 2018). Only a limited number of studies have explored how coastal farming systems have responded and adapted to socioecological drivers.Farm typologies and characterization of farming systems have been widely used to understand systems complexity and agricultural development trajectories by simplifying and organizing farms into separate but relatively homogenous groups internally (Iraizoz et al., 2007;Tittonell et al., 2010;Alvarez et al., 2018). Trajectories of farming systems can be studied in different ways, for example through inductive (Pelling et al., 2008) or deductive approaches (Valbuena et al., 2008;Tittonell et al., 2010). The former are defined by the actors (for e.g. farmers or extension agents) themselves while the latter are drawn from theory or conceptual frameworks developed by researchers (Overmars and Verburg, 2007;Sierra et al., 2017). Deductive approaches have been used to study pathways and trajectories of change in socioecological systems (Valbuena et al., 2015;Groot et al., 2016), though most recent (Sierra et al., 2017;Alvarez et al., 2018;Lopez-Ridaura et al., 2018;Jelsma et al., 2019) and widely cited (cf. Valbuena et al., 2008;Righi et al., 2011;Tittonell et al., 2010;Daloğlu et al., 2014;Cortez-Arriola et al., 2015;Kuivanen et al., 2016) studies use single year cross-sectional data or aggregate country/regional data. While cross-sectional data cannot control for personal fixed effects (e.g. level of education), aggregate data can underestimate the influence of individual farm-level change. This reduces the accuracy and applicability of insights derived from trajectory studies. Typological analysis of cross-sectional data collected from different farms is only plausible when farm type change and dynamics are independent realizations of the same evolutionary process across the farming system. However, constructed cross-sectional typologies represent only a possible occurrence order of a small set of properties or traits at a particular point of time when the data was collected. They cannot reveal the dynamic process of farming system change. Useful insights can conversely be gained using long-term panel data.Hierarchical clustering on Principal components (from principal component analysis (PCA)) is the most common statistical method used to analyze development trajectories of farm types (Valbuena et al., 2008;Tittonell et al., 2010;Cortez-Arriola et al., 2015;Kuivanen et al., 2016). But linking farming systems' development trajectories to a handful of principal component (PC) axes may be misleading-what appears like the signal of an interesting biophysical or socioeconomic property may simply be an artifact stemming from how PCA is computed. Falconnier et al. (2015) and Valbuena et al. (2015) built longitudinal farm typologies for analysis of PC axes and generated clusters for different time periods. But they did not attempt any statistical extension using panel data models. By focusing analyses exclusively on the PC axes, as is commonly done in trajectory studies, researchers are, in effect, taking a biased sample of a multivariate distribution (Mitteroecker et al., 2004), while also ignoring stochasticity that can cause some dimensions to diverge more rapidly, while others exhibit less divergence across time periods (Uyeda et al., 2015).Unlike cross-sectional analyses, most panel data tends to be analyzed using parametric models involving Generalized Linear Mixed Models or using marginal methods including Generalized Estimating Equations. When considering trajectory studies, these classical approaches could however also be biased because variables in panel data are typically sparse and highly dimensional (Di et al., 2014). Integrating multivariate statistics with panel regression may therefore help to reduce the high dimensionality of longitudinal data (Yao et al., 2005).Apart from statistical issues, knowledge gaps regarding the historical influences determining changes in farming systems have also led to inefficiencies in agricultural policy development (Adamson et al., 2018). The idea that multiple levels of contextual influence affect complex systems through interdependent interactions is an ecological view that has a long tradition since Bronfenbrenner's socioecological systems theory published in 1989. A set of factors function at multiple hierarchical levels: -micro (e.g., household), -meso (e.g., institutions), −macro (e.g., population) has been emphasized in systems analysis (Berkes and Folke, 1998;Hettig et al., 2016), though quantification of the effects of these factors on trajectories is rare. For instance, despite researchers recognizing the role of meso-level factors that condition changes in infrastructure and market and institutional systems (Hazell and Wood, 2008;Anderies et al., 2016), longitudinal evidence on farming systems change remains largely lacking in South Asia, as are studies that consider and integrate meso-and micro-level factors. These factors, which for example may include farmers' level of agricultural experience, changes in crops, irrigation and farm machinery, tenure and land fragmentation (Piotrowski et al., 2013;Paul and wa Gĩthĩnji, 2018), could shed new insight on how and why farming systems change, with important implications for development policies and environmental adaptation priorities (Adamson et al., 2018).This paper introduces a new systems analysis approach to model trajectories of farm typologies, systems dynamics and socioecological drivers using the south-central coast of Bangladesh as a study area. This new approach is characterized by integrating a well-articulated theoretical frame of change observed using a temporal view of change processes and outcomes. We used twenty years panel data from 502 households and analyzed those utilizing multivariate statistics in conjunction with panel data models that operationalize our theoretical framework. Our approach estimates the dynamic change effects over time that cannot typically be estimated utilizing cross-sectional data set. The approach also distinguishes between time-invariant fixed and time-independent random effects of multi-level socioecological drivers, while also controlling for omitted variables.Bangladesh is the world's most densely populated deltaic country with low per-capita farmland and rural development challenges (Turner and Ali, 1996;World Bank, 2015). About 40 million people in Bangladesh remain severely food insecure. Another 11 million suffer from acute hunger (WFP, 2016), the majority of whom inhabit coastal areas. More than 40% of productive land is projected to be lost in the southern region of Bangladesh for a 0.65 meter sea-level rise (World Bank, 2013). In Bangladesh's south-central coastal zone, tidal water flooding during the monsoon \"Kharif\" season (June-August) is common, though transplanted 'aman' rice (Oryza sativa) is widely grown during this period. Without large-scale irrigation development, farmers however experience water scarcity during the cool, dry winter \"Rabi\" season (November to April). Soil and water salinity as well as cyclonic storms pose further challenges in the Kharif -Rabi seasons. Farmers tend to fallow their land or grow low risk, low-input 'opportunity' crops including broadcast, unfertilized legumes predominantly mungbean (Vigna radiata) and lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus) during the Rabi season. Development approaches that increase farm productivity by conserving natural resources, increasing resource use efficiency and ecosystem services while improving social equity, i.e. sustainable intensification (SI) (Godfray et al., 2010), have been proposed to guide policy in Bangladesh's coastal farming systems (MOA-FAO, 2013;Krupnik et al., 2017). A component of SI involves increasing cropping intensity, i.e. the number of crops grown per year on the same land, thereby raising yield per year per unit of farmland, while also minimizing land expansion and consequent biodiversity loss.A system of embankments known as polders, consisting of dykes and sluicegate controls were constructed by the Bangladeshi government in 1960s to control oceanic water intrusion, protect against cyclones and support coastal agriculture. Poor maintenance and competition for resources has however resulted in many poorly functioning polders and sluice gates. Poor drainage, land subsidence, and soil salinity pose mounting problems, although their effect is spatially heterogeneous (Krupnik et al., 2017). The diversity of these linked socioecological issues calls into question the usefulness of standard and 'blanket' development approaches (Goswami et al., 2014). This research responds to these theoretical and methodological challenges and employs panel data models to the study of farming systems change both within and outside polders in Bangladesh's central coast. Our objective is to improve understanding of farm trajectories of change by untangling multilevel drivers that influence farming systems dynamics, and to use this information to inform relevant policy aimed at sustainable development in coastal South Asia.The socioecological views explaining agricultural growth, unlike population-pressure theories by Mathusian (neo-Malthusian) and Boserupian (Boserup, 1965), emphasize human-environment relationships and their influence on agriculture (Ali, 1995). These relationships, however, are driven by numerous socioecological factors, particularly the multiple levels of constraints imposed by the population pressure, biophysical environment, and the socio-technological and economic abilities of farm households to reduce and modify those constraints (Ali, 1995;Aravindakshan et al., 2018). These constraints can be harnessed to sustainably intensify farming systems rather than leading to uncontrollable natural resource depletion. To do so, the forms (types) and pathways of farming systems responses should be understood and modeled by socioecological drivers across spatio-temporal scales.We outline a conceptual framework for the study of farm trajectories of change at different scales in consideration of the dynamics of systems change (Fig. 1). The process of change is represented over time (t), t 1 to t 2 . In t 1 , a farming system may consist of 'n' number of farm types, which are likely to follow 'm' number of pathways with a probability 'p'. This results in n + q farm types at time t 2 , with q < 0 if farming systems tend towards homogeneity (less diverse) in structures and functions over time, and q > 0 if diversity increases. 'q' can take any value including 0, but not < '−n'.The factors driving these dynamics include complex and interacting biophysical, socioeconomic, behavioral, or social influences that operate at multiple scales (Hettig et al., 2016). Macro-and meso-level factors are exogenous and beyond the control of individual farmers; micro-level factors are conversely endogenous and subject to farmers' agency. A farm belonging to a particular type undergoes change over time, forming a trajectory of change in terms of selected farm features. Although we only show two pathways of change in Fig. 1, a farm has multiple 'm' options based on the direction and magnitude of influence of different factors. This conceptualization is intended as a general model of farm trajectories and factors of change, although it is likely to differ from system to system according to prevailing drivers.At the macro-level, three major factors are widely considered to influence agrarian change over time. Firstly, population density is considered as a major driver of agricultural intensification as it can increase both the demand for food and supply and demand for farm labor, in addition to land fragmentation (Boserup, 1965). Declining population density on the other hand may lead to farmland consolidation, land fallowing, and/or land sales and sharecropping. Secondly, economic growth may change diets and consumption patterns, thereby increasing demand for food products even without population growth. Third, variability in climate and extreme weather events -for example tropical storms and cyclones in the Bay of Bengal (Knutson et al., 2010;Huq et al., 2015) -may affect agricultural change (Hazell and Wood, 2008).The diversity of farming systems can be represented by typologies that segregate farm households into different farm types which may be defined by the structural (e.g. landholding, crops, livestock size) and/or functional variables (e.g. cropping intensity, technology adoption) that may result from interactions between micro-and meso-level factors, and macro-level drivers (Fig. 1). A range of micro-level factors, including past experience of cropping, household level adoption of improved crop varieties, irrigation, and machinery, tenure and land fragmentation could influence household livelihood strategies (Piotrowski et al., 2013;Paul and wa Gĩthĩnji, 2018). Farmers' decisions could also be conditioned and mediated by meso-level factors, including access to finance, extension services and civil infrastructure that in turn can influence relative farm input-output prices and access to new technologies and markets (Shiferaw and Bantilan, 2004;Amjath-Babu et al., 2016). Many studies of agrarian change focus on macrolevel drivers without considering lower level drivers or the diversity of farming systems types (cf. Boserup, 1965;Turner and Ali, 1996;Pingali, 2012). Furthermore, assumptions of the homogenous impact of multilevel factors across farm types may be overly simplistic. For example, in case of farm types experiencing land scarcity, population growth can lead to fragmentation of landholdings and competition for natural resources. An additional challenge in the study of agrarian change is the difficulty in measuring the dynamics of farming systems change in and of itself. Our approach, detailed below, is to first illustrate the farm types present at a given time 't 1 ' and proportion of farms changed from one type to another in a time 't 2 ', then subsequently identifying the dominant variables influencing these changes. These variables are then related to potential micro-, meso-and macro-level driving forces.The study area in the south-central part of Bangladesh has been identified as potentially suitable for cropping systems intensification using surface water irrigation to forgo Rabi season land fallowing (Krupnik et al., 2017). The region is characterized by a dense network of interconnected rivers and natural canals that flow into the Bay of Bengal. Annual rainfall ranges from 1955 to 2100 mm (BBS, 2013), with a humid sub-tropical climate. Most soils are medium to high textured silty clay loams (SRDI, 2010). The southern-most part of the central coast (Patuakhali, Barguna and Pirojpur districts) is protected by polders constructed since 1960s. So far 123 polders covering an area of about 13 million ha have been constructed across coastal Bangladesh that include 6000 km of channels, 2500 water control structures, and 5000 km of embankments (World Bank, 1990).Across Barisal, Patuakhali, Barguna and Pirojpur, approximately 70% of the households within polders are engaged in farming, while farming households are 59% outside the polders (BBS, 2016). The farming systems both within and outside polders are traditionally mixed, in which rice, livestock and pond aquaculture are integrated on the same farm. The majority of agrarian households (HHs) both within and outside polders are engaged in rainfed cropping in the Kharif (mid-March to mid-November) and Rabi (mid-November to mid-March) seasons. Kharif sowing coincides with the onset of monsoon, and is further divided into pre-monsoon Kharif-1 (mid-March to mid-July) during which local 'aus' rice varieties are grown, and monsoon Kharif-2 (mid-July to mid-November) when aman rice is grown. The Rabi season falls during the dry winter period, when farmers within polders grow primarily pulses, while farmers in non-polder areas cultivate pulses, mustard and vegetables. Irrigated Rabi season rice production known as 'boro' occurs in select areas proximal to water sources.We developed a balanced panel dataset at farm household level of 502 HHs in coastal Bangladesh in Barisal division, spanning 20 years from 1995 to 2015 as part of the multi-year Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) project. This dataset is compiled from a farm household level primary survey, NGO records pertaining to household characteristics, farmer focus groups and secondary data sources. Sample were selected from a list of farm HHs provided by the NGO (Bangladesh Development Society) that keeps village level records of selected coastal districts in Southern Bangladesh. Two districts within polders (Patuakhali and Barguna) and a single district outside polders (Barisal district) were selected for the study (Table 1; Fig. 2). We selected these three districts of the total 27 districts in southern Bangladesh due to specific interest considering the potential for crop intensification and surface water irrigation in coastal Bangladesh (see Krupnik et al., 2017). In addition, data from districts other than the above for the time period 1995-2010 was not available from our partner NGOs or other sources for the study.A non-probability purposive sampling procedure was subsequently used to select HHs from the list whose information on select variables (Refer Table 2 for variable description) were available in the NGO records. Out of the 311 and 336 households outside and within polder areas in the list, 107 and 38 households were excluded due to data gaps, respectively. A final sample of 204 HHs outside polders and 298 HHs within polder areas were selected such that at least 5% of all HHs in each of the selected villages were sampled as advised by Turner (2003). HH level information on several variables for these selected HHs, spanning for a period of 1995-2010 were then compiled. These same HHs were surveyed in 2015 by the authors in order to develop a twenty year panel data set by combining the compiled information with the authors HH survey. Above panel data set used in this paper is made openly available by CIMMYT DataVerse for interested users here: http://hdl.handle.net/11529/10898.The variables in the panel data set developed included farm structural and functional characteristics, household resource endowment, Note: In Bangladesh and several parts of South Asia including eastern India, rice is cultivated three times in a year differentiated by names \"aus, aman or boro\". The aman (broadcast and transplanted) rice is generally cultivated in mid-July to mid-November, sown with the onset of South-west monsoon rains, boro (irrigated rice) in Feb-May, and aus rice in mid-March to mid-July cropping seasons utilizing summer rains. agricultural management information, and data on off-and on-farm income, in addition to biophysical and socio-economic attributes. Village-level population and demographic data for twenty years period used in this study was obtained from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. In addition to the above, gaps from missing data were filled by collecting and validating information through a combination of 9 farmer focus group discussions and presentation of raw data to household members and through secondary sources including household income and expenditure survey (HIES) by Bangladesh government. Graphical overviews of selected variables for years 1995 and 2015 are given in Figs. 3 and 4 for sample outside and within polders, respectively. Detailed summary statistics are provided in Table 2.Our analysis for farm HHs outside polders (OP) and within polders (WP) proceeded in three steps. First, we developed farm typologies for farm households outside and within polders separately. Distinct farm types were identified for 1995 and 2015. In the second step, we identified the most important variables contributing farm type changes across panel years. In the last step, we identified the multi-level factors driving farm type dynamics using panel data regression models. A historical review of literature was also carried out to complement our findings. In the first analytical stage, transition from one farm type to another is captured by farm trajectories of change over time. Towards this, both Principal Component analysis (PCA) and Cluster Analysis were employed (Alvarez et al., 2018) to categorize farm HHs based on the basis of their structural (resource endowment) and functional (production and land use objectives/livelihood strategies) characteristics (Kuivanen et al., 2016). Following the PCA on the data, Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering employing Ward's minimum-variance method, was done on the PCA (PCs' scores) to identify clusters. The Ward's method Notes:-psd = person-day, which is 8 h of work. a Index developed by summing up the product of cyclone events and farmer's perception on an individual cyclone's severity on a scale of 0-3 in the respective years observed.b Categories on a scale of 1-5; 1 = low level and 5 = high level of fragmentation. 1USD was ∼40 BDT in 1995 while it was ∼78 BDT in 2015. c Tropical livestock unit (TLU) was calculated according to method given by Harvest Choice 2015 (https://harvestchoice.org/data/an05_tlu). d Sharecropping intensity is ratio of sharecropped land to total land available for cultivation in %.e Cropping intensity averaged across fields is calculated as × 100Total land area ha farm yearand will exceed 100% where double or triple croppingis practiced.All monetary values are nominal. minimizes within-cluster variation by comparing two clusters using the sum of squares between the two clusters, summed over all variables (Alvarez et al., 2018). The number of clusters (i.e. farm types) was defined using the dendrogram shape, in particular the decrease of the dissimilarity index (\"Height\") according to the increase of the number of clusters (Alvarez et al., 2018). We named these clusters based on four criteria: own landholding area, crop-livestock-aquaculture activities, off-farm income and sharecropping. We used Bangladesh's National Agricultural Extension Policy criteria to categorize farms based on the first criteria, i.e. landholding area, such that marginal farmers are those with landholdings of 0.2 to 0.6 ha; small farmers between 0.61 and 1.00 ha; medium between 1.01 and 3.03 ha; and large 3.03 ha or more (MOA, 2012, pp. 2; para 3).In the second stage, we explored the principal components for changes in typology variables' contribution across panel years from 1995 to 2015 to farming systems change. Variables highly correlated with a principal component (PC) contribute most to its scores (Husson et al., 2017). The percentile contributions of each variable to the principal components can be assessed to determine if any variables strongly influence a particular PC (David and Jacobs, 2014). The contribution (C k ) of a variable 'k' to a given PC is calculated as:where (cos k ) 2 in Eq. ( 1) is the squared cosine of a variable 'k' that represents the quality of the representation of that variable quantified as the squared loadings for that variable in the principal component. Squared cosines (cos 2 ) thus help locate the variables important for a given PC based on their relative contribution (Abdi and Williams, 2010). Cumulative contributions of all variables in the selected PCs (with eigenvalues ≥1.0) for each panel year (1995 to 2015) were assessed to identify the variables showing strongest contribution to variance. Those with the greatest contribution across years are assumed to have robust linkages to change trajectories among sampled farms. These are the 'farm dynamicity inducing variables' that were analyzed using panel regression models in the second stage as described below.In the third analytical stage, we analyzed the effects of multi-level factors/drivers of change on dominant variables contributing to farm type dynamics in panel years (T) by employing panel data modelling (Hsiao et al., 2000;Baltagi, 2008). Let the panel dataset contain observations of the multi-level factors and drivers of change (independent variables), X 1 , X 2 , …, X k and the dominant variables contributing to farm type dynamics, whose identification is explained in Section 3. where i = 1, …, n and t = 1, …, T, where the first subscript, i, refers to the farm being observed, and the second term t, refers to the observational year (T = 5 in our case). In Eq. ( 2), ε it is the error term and Z i ' is a set of farm household-specific micro-level factors (Table 2). Since Z i ' in the data has both observed and farmers' perceived variables, the ordinary linear model fitted by least squares would suffer from bias (Baltagi, 2008). We therefore estimated a generalized fixed effects (FE) model (Eq. ( 3)) when Z i ' is unobserved, but correlated with X it , and when Z i ' is observed, then we estimated a generalized random effects (RE) model by introducing a household specific random element μ i as in Eq. ( 4).We ran both FE and RE estimators for all dependent variables Y 1 , Y 2 , …, Y m obtained from stage 1 and compared results using the Hausman test, the results of which are reported in Section 4.3. The effect of multilevel factors/drivers were assessed from the coefficient estimates, i.e. 'β s ' and 'α s '. All statistical analyses are conducted using packages plm (Croissant and Millo, 2008) and FactoMineR (Husson et al., 2017) in R (version 3.3.2).Farm typology analysis of data yielded a multivariate classification of distinct farm typologies segregated by those located within and or outside polders. Farm types observed in five-year increments from 1995 to 2015 are provided in the Supplementary Materials (Table SM 1 and SM 2). Performing typology analysis on 204 farms outside polders revealed seven distinct farm types for the baseline year 1995 (Fig. 5A). The same farms were re-classified into three types in 2015 (Fig. 5B). The dendrograms and cut-off points based on dissimilarity for all the years for farms located within or outside polders are shown in the Supplementary Materials (Figure SM 1 (A) and (B)). Farm types identified outside polders are labelled as t 1 1 to t 1 7, and t 2 1 to t 2 3 respectively, where t 1 and t 2 correspond to time periods 1995 and 2015. Numbers conversely correspond to typology clusters. A detailed account of the farm types with the names defining structural and functional characteristics are provided in the Supplementary Materials (Text SM 1 to SM 4). For farms located within polders, the trend with respect to farming systems was similar to those outside polders: consolidation into fewer farm types was observed over time in both locational categories. The typology analysis for farms within polders for1995 and 2015 identified six and three farm types, respectively (Fig. 5C and D).Fig. 6 shows shifts between farm types from the baseline in 1995 to the final year of analysis in 2015. Among farms outside polders, the proportion of marginal farms increased from 52% in 1995 to over 70% by 2015. The share of small farms also increased by 8% during the same period, while medium-sized farms whose proportion was 26% in 1995 disappeared entirely by 2015. Out of the medium-sized farms with ricelivestock-sharecropping systems (t 1 7), 92% became small farms with rice-pulse and aquaculture-sharecropping systems (t 2 3) in 2015, while the remaining 8% became marginal farms with rice-aquaculture systems and off-farm activities (t 2 1). Among farms within polders, 84% of small farm types transitioned into marginal farms by 2015. The remaining farms changed to two small farm types (t 2 B and t 2 C) by 2015. There was only one marginal farm type in 2015 that can be described as rice-pulse-aquaculture systems with off-farm income (t 2 A). These constituted 67% of observed farms in 2015. In 1995, two medium-sized farm types were observed that comprised 20% of all farms surveyed. Roughly 22% of medium-sized sharecropping farms with rice-livestockpulse-aquaculture systems (t 1 E) farms transitioned into marginal farms with rice-pulse-aquaculture supplemented by off-farm income (t 2 A) by 2015. The remaining 78% shifted into small rice-pulse-aquaculture and a significant proportion of sharecropping activities (t 2 B). Ninety-one percent of medium-sized sharecropping farms with rice-livestockpulse-aquaculture systems (t 1 E) transitioned into type t 2 B (Small farms with rice-pulse systems and off-farm income) by 2015, while 9% shifted into marginally sized farms with rice-aquaculture systems and off-farm income (t 2 C).Within the polders, the real income from edible crops showed negative growth (−1.6%) for marginally sized farms between 1995 and 2015, there was however a remarkably higher growth rate from aquaculture (> 950%) and remittance (> 500%) (Table SM 6). Income from edible crops for small sized farms also exhibited a positive growth rate, but at just 6% during this twenty year period. Both income from aquaculture and remittance showed increase in growth rate of 180% and 131% respectively for small farms outside polders. A trend towards non-farm income generation also appears to be growing among marginally sized farms outside polders. This shift towards off-farm income outside polders is however less prominent among smaller farms, despite a slight 2% growth rate (Table SM 5). Among farms in polders, trends during this twenty years are only notable for small farms, as marginally sized were not existent in 1995, and medium sized farms had disappeared by 2015 (Fig. 8B). Growth in non-farm income (6%) was however observed with increasing remittances and off-farm income generation, in addition to income from cash crops (Fig. 8B and Table SM 6). The contribution of livestock to household income within polders has also conversely declined over time (Fig. 8B).Five distinct cropping patterns practiced by farmers located outside polders were distinguished during the Kharif-1 (spring), Kharif-2 (summer), and Rabi (winter) seasons. Their corresponding drivers of change are found in Fig. 7A. Cropping patterns within polders were equally diverse, but their abundance differed when compared to those found outside polders (Fig. 7B). Four cropping patterns were practiced by most farms within polders during the Kharif-1 (spring), Kharif-2 (summer), and Rabi (winter) seasons (Fig. 7B). During the 1995-2007 period, 'fallow-aman rice-lathyrus' rotations were practiced by > 60% farmers with land outside polders.Both within and outside polder areas, cyclones Sidr and Aila appear to have had adverse impacts on irrigated rice production during 2007 and 2009. Farmers turned to less intensive cropping patterns including pulses (which were slowly becoming more profitable) and land fallowing in the wake of both events. Towards the late 1990s, 'fallowaman rice-mungbean' cropping sequences emerged as an important rotation outside of polders. By 2015 this pattern dominated -> 70% farms surveyed outside of polders followed this pattern, with mungbean as a widely favored pulse.By the year 2000 each village sampled within polders on average had 4-5 low-lift irrigation pumps. This helped expansion of irrigated boro rice cultivation by drawing water from rivers and canals, though cyclones Sidr and Aila caused later damage to sluice gates that regulate water inflow and outflow from the canals. Sluice gates, which were initially installed through governmental programs, have yet to be repaired in a number of the surveyed villages. As an alternative to irrigated cultivation, farmers have slowly shifted to minor pulses including black gram, cowpea and field pea, grown prior to with spring rice (aus). Major pulses such as mungbean and lathyrus were also popular. The 'fallow-rice-various pulses' cropping pattern remained prominent until 2010 when mungbean began to replace other pulses. The other predominant cropping pattern, 'fallow-aman rice-fallow', declined from 10% to 4% between 1995 and 2015.We identified variables that contributed strongly to each principal SM 3 and SM 4). Fig. 8 indicates that farm type dynamics are strongly linked to cropping intensity, off-farm income and landholding outside polders, while inside polders, the dynamics is linked to cropping intensity, off-farm income and livestock.Tables 3 and 4 provide panel data model estimates of factors influencing farm change trajectories for samples within and outside polders. The Hausman test for the goodness of fit of the fixed effects versus random effects for all models informs whether the random effects estimator is consistent and the model is valid. The test was significant (P > 0.05), rejecting the null hypothesis of a consistent fixed effects estimator for all models.Among micro-level factors, farm household heads' experience exerted a significant (P ≤ 0.05) negative influence on cropping intensity within polders (Table 4). Outside polders, this effect though negative was nonetheless insignificant (Table 3). During focus groups, older farmers revealed their preference for growing rice over cash crops when monsoon rains are available, with land left fallow in the subsequent winter season. Rice being the main staple crop in Bangladesh, this preference according to them is to ensure household food security. Compared to households with no direct involvement in farming operations (i.e., those who tended to work as hired laborers), households fully involved in agricultural production had average cropping intensities that are 1.3 times greater, ceteris paribus. Household heads' direct involvement in farming activities however tend to negatively and significantly (P ≤ 0.001) influence the households' share of off-farm income in polders. Within polders, the proportion of land upon which farmers used machinery for tillage was positively related to cropping intensity (P ≤ 0.05) (Table 4). Mechanized tillage was inversely related (P ≤ 0.05) to livestock holdings both within and outside of polders. Land fragmentation into separate parcels was observed to have a negative (P ≤ 0.001) influence on cropping intensity in all study locations (Table 4). Farmers' perceptions of soil fertility showed a positive (P ≤ 0.1) influence on cropping intensity outside polders, although within polders, no relationship could be discerned. Farmers located outside polders did not report problems of soil or water salinity, while those within polders reported low, moderate and high soil and water salinity. Perceived soil and water salinity within polders had a negative (P ≤ 0.1) impact on cropping intensity.Another qualitative variable farmers were surveyed on was 'Inundation class\". This variable was based on classifications described by Brammer (2013) as the average perceived depth of flooding during the monsoon season, and is widely used by farmers to describe their land types. The level of inundation during the monsoon is important in determining the variety of rice that can be grown, and the speed at which floodwaters vacate following the summer monsoon to permit cropping in the early winter season (Krupnik et al., 2017). The official land inundation classification system is complex, with five classes. For simplification, we asked farmers to report if their fields on average belonged to \"low\" (> 180 cm average water depth) \"medium\" (30-180 cm water depth) or \"high\" (0-30 cm water depth) during the monsoon season. Our results indicated that lower inundation depths associated with progressively higher land on a micro-elevation basis positively and significantly (P ≤ 0.05) influenced cropping intensity both within and outside polders (Table 4). Farms with a higher share of fields on 'highlands' are also more likely to be suitable for doublecropping. This result that could be influenced by drainage problems associated with land subsidence and poor polder engineering that prevents timely winter cropping, even on highlands, within polder systems in the central coast of Bangladesh (Krupnik et al., 2017). Model estimates showed positive (P ≤ 0.05) relationship between landholding size outside polders and lower inundation depths (Table 3). These results indicate that farmers prefer in both locational classifications less flood-prone lands that can be more reliably cropped.Turning to micro-level factors influencing off-farm income, land fragmentation positively and significantly (P ≤ 0.001) influenced the share of farm household's off-farm income both within and outside polders. Outside polders, inundation class negatively (P ≤ 0.001) influenced off-farm income (Table 3). In other words, farms with higher land less subjected to prolonged monsoon water stagnation were associated with a 7% reduction in share of off-farm income.Both increasing distance to the market and main road from the farm negatively and significantly (P ≤ 0.001) influenced cropping intensities of all farms in the sample (Tables 3 and 4). A similar negative (P ≤ 0.001) relationship was found between output market distance and share of off-farm income within and outside polders (Tables 3 and 4). Access to extension on the other hand had a positive and significant influence (P ≤ 0.001) on cropping intensity within polders (Table 4). Access to credit was insignificant across locations, though approximately 5% of surveyed farmers in polders reported constraints in timely availability and access to agricultural finance. Farmers with secure land tenure were also found associated with increased cropping intensity compared to those heavily involved in share cropping. Tenure rights had a positive and highly significant influence (P ≤ 0.01) on cropping intensities both within and outside of polders (Tables 3 and 4).Irrigation canal proximally to farms had no significant influence on cropping intensity or off-farm income outside polders (Table 3). Irrigation canals situated near farmers' fields conversely had a marginally significant (P ≤ 0.1) and positive influence on larger farm size (Table 3). Cropping intensity within polders decreased significantly (P ≤ 0.05) with increasing distance to irrigation canals (Table 4). The influence of irrigation canal distance on off-farm income within polders was however positive and significant (P ≤ 0.01), indicating that farmers may seek off-farm income opportunities when irrigation is distant and unreliable (Table 4). Our results also highlight the very significant (P ≤ 0.001) and positive relationship between labor availability and cropping intensity both within and outside polders (Tables 3 and 4).The relationship between village population size and cropping intensity was positive and significant (P ≤ 0.001) outside polders (Table 3). Population density however had no effect on the amount of land owned or off-farm income (Table 3). Population growth also had no association with cropping intensity inside polders, despite a positive trend (Table 4). Importantly, past cyclone severity negatively and significantly affected cropping intensities of farms both within and outside polders (P ≤ 0.001) (Tables 3 and 4). Past cyclones severity also negatively influenced the amount of land owned (P ≤ 0.05) and off-farm income (P ≤ .05) outside polders (Table 3), while within polders, cyclones severity was negatively associated with the number of livestock owned (P ≤ 0.05) (Table 4). A single unit increase in cyclonic severity was associated with a two to three time reduction in cropping intensity within and outside polders, respectively. During focus groups, farmers who had experienced cyclones and extreme weather also indicated that they responded by reducing cropped area or by fallowing to hedge risks.Using a novel systems analysis approach integrating multivariate statistics with panel data models that operationalize the theoretical framework described in Section 2, we studied how biophysical processes interact with complex human and management components that define coastal farming systems both within and outside polder areas using two decades of data. Farming systems studied exhibit spatial and temporal dynamics that highlight how farm types transition over time in response to multi-level drivers of change. Both within and outside polders, marginal and small farms dominated in 2015, as compared to larger farms twenty years earlier. The number of medium and large farms for example also sharply declined in north-western Bangladesh since 2005 (Misra, 2017). Similar observations have been made for population dense and intensively cultivated landscapes in parts of South East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa (Rigg et al., 2016;Jayne et al., 2016).Our findings highlight a consistent trend throughout for farms observed outside polders. Once heterogeneous, rice-livestock farms have shifted to more homogenous farms with aquaculture and increasing offfarm income generating activities. Within polders, trends were only notable for smaller farm types. Growth in remittances and off-farm income generation was however observed, in addition to income from cash crops. The contribution of livestock to household income conversely declined. Considering marginally sized farms within polders, there was more than a nine and five-fold increase in income contribution from aquaculture and remittances, respectively. Income from edible crops for small sized farms also exhibited a positive trend, but at just 6%. For smaller farms outside polders, both income from aquaculture and remittances showed increased growth rates of 180% and 131%, respectively. Farmers also shifted from subsistence aquaculture to the production of commercial species including tilapia, pangasius, and catfish (Hernandez et al., 2018). Unlike the south-western Bangladesh where prawn production has competed with rice for land and water resources, aquacultural intensification in south-central Bangladesh appears to have had limited negative environmental and social impacts (Henriksson et al., 2018).Irrespective of typology, farming systems in both the study locations continued to be aman rice-based. Until approximately 2005, boro rice production (during the winter Rabi season) also flourished both within and outside polders, but then declined. In polders outside our study area in south-western Bangladesh, concerns of elite capture of surface water resources by commercial prawn farmers diverting saline water into canal systems have been common (cf. Dewan et al., 2015). Southcentral Bangladesh however has more hydrologically active freshwater canal systems -in some cases even within polders (Krupnik et al., 2017).Between 1996 and 1998, national agricultural policy in Bangladesh re-introduced fertilizer price subsidies. Changes included increased control on input market price volatility, making fertilizers affordable (Jaim and Akter, 2012). Farmers outside polders may have responded by transitioning to new cropping patterns including 'fallow-aman ricevegetables', with the latter crop requiring increased fertilizer. This period also saw the expansion of 'fallow-aman rice-irrigated boro rice' corresponding to expanding availability of low-lift surface water pumps, in addition to fertilizer (Mottaleb et al., 2016). In the winter season, boro rice area continued to decrease within and outside polders from 2005 to 2010. This appeared to be a result of urea shortages that followed the introduction of a government subsidized fertilizer voucher system. Focus group interviews indicated that politically connected farmers captured more vouchers than less well-connected farmers, rending the system less efficient and negatively influencing aggregate boro production. Differences in cropping patterns outside and within polders were evident until 2010. Farmers outside polders favored 'fallow-aman rice-lathyrus' rotations compared to 'aus rice-aman ricemungbean' within the polders. Nonetheless, there is now a clear shift towards 'fallow-aman rice-mungbean' sequences in both areas, with a definite growth in mungbean cultivation.The GoB's Master Plan for Development in the Southern region proposed by the MOA and FAO in 2013 suggests initiatives to increase boro rice production in place of fallows. This however conflicts with the growing popularity of mungbean in the winter season. Focus groups indicated that low paddy prices and relatively higher labor costs provide disincentive against boro, in addition to high irrigation costs. Although mungbean is favored as a low-input opportunity crop that fetches better prices, it fairs poorly in the face of storms and waterlogging common in the coastal region (Biswas et al., 2018). Further studies regarding its suitability vis-a-vis other options are still warranted.Changes in farm types appeared to be linked to dynamicity inducing variables: (1) cropping intensity and (2) off-farm income, and (3) landholding and livestock, the former two are for both outside and within polders. Our analysis revealed the influence of multi-level socioecological drivers of trajectories of farming systems change. Ours results show that while cropping intensities both within and outside polders reduce with increased farm fragmentation; farmers responded to this and other environmental stresses through off-farm income generation. Bangladeshi inheritance laws stipulate the sub-division of land to multiple heirs after loss of parents (Rahman and Rahman, 2009). Amending these laws in order to prevent sub-division may be an important consideration in policy supportive of crop intensification.Secure land tenure rights was positively associated with cropping intensity. In focus groups, sharecroppers reported aversion to investment in land management or irrigation in the absence of secure land rights. Tenure insecurity could also reduce farmers' interest in improving soil quality over time as farmers discount future investments (Tenaw et al., 2009). At current rates, the cost of securing tenure rights through land registration is roughly 10% of total land value (Islam and Lee, 2016). This is prohibitive to small and marginal farmers in the coastal region, which provides evidence on the need for land tenure policy reformation and improvements in informal land sharing arrangements.Our data also indicated that most farmers in the central coast have tended to depend on inherent soil fertility with little application of inorganic or organic amendments. This observation aligns with concerns of declining soil fertility in Bangladesh (Barmon et al., 2008). Balanced nutrient 'budgets' have been reported to contribute to farmers' willingness to shifts from single cropping to double and even triple cropping in Bangladesh (Schulthess et al., 2019). Extension systems should therefore maintain a focus on appropriate nutrient management regimes.The inundation classes to which a farm belongs had positive influence on cropping intensity: farmers with highlands and medium-highlands tend to grow more crops per year. On medium-lowlands and below, as well as within polders with land subsidence, social (e.g. water users' groups) and technical (e.g., drainage canals) may be necessary to help drain stagnant water after the monsoon. Drainage systems are however complex and will require careful coordination to permit land preparation so a diversity of subsequent winter season crops can be grown (Krupnik et al., 2017). Finally, the environmental risks posed by cyclones had a negative influence on both cropping intensity and offfarm income generation. There have been considerable crop losses associated with previous extreme weather events in coastal Bangladesh. Opportunities for climate services that increase farmers' ability to anticipate and cope with extreme climatic events may also be beneficial in reducing risk. Cyclones and extreme weather are widely cited as riskbearing factors that can limit rural developments efforts in coastal South Asia (Mottaleb et al., 2016); options for farm insurance can also be explored to hedge risks.The farming systems in the central coast of Bangladesh draw attention to the range of socioecological drivers that affect agricultural intensification pathways and rural livelihoods. Boserup (1965) and several others recently, including Jayne et al. (2014), Muyanga and Jayne (2014) and Ricker-Gilbert et al. (2014), have shown the significance of population pressure as the main driver of agrarian change. Surprisingly, our data showed inconsistent effects of population pressure, with positive significance outside polders, and a non-significant positive trend within them. Our research however underscores the significance of a host of additional and equally important factors, including those associated with climatic risks and tenure insecurity that negatively affect cropping intensity. Farm households observed in our data can be seen as either 'hanging in, stepping up, or out' of farming as a primary livelihood strategy (cf. Dorward et al., 2009). Such dynamics have been measured in sub-Saharan Africa (Tittonell, 2014) but not previously in South Asia. Increasing importance of off-farm income (remittances and off-farm employment), particularly for small and marginally sized farms can be seen as 'stepping out' of farming. Conversely, 12% and 22% of farms outside and within polders, respectively, tended to continuously fallow land during the winter between 2005 and 2015. This indicates a 'hanging in' strategy for farms less reliant on offfarm income. Increasing income from intensified cropping is likely to require considerable changes and inclusion of high value crops supported by requisite irrigation infrastructure, market access, and supportive policies (Krupnik et al., 2017). Although sufficiently robust to detect the abovementioned trends, our approach may however be to some extent be sensitive to difficulties encountered when farmers attempt to recall information during surveys. These risks were however mitigated in our study through cross-validation with secondary sources and confirmation of observed trends through follow-up focus groups.According to Singh (2002) farming systems in the coastal region of South Asia are solely represented by 'coastal artisanal fishing mixed farming systems' comprising of mixed systems of rice, pulses, livestock and aquaculture. We therefore consider that our data and sample exemplifies the agrarian change in mixed rice-livestock-aquaculture systems typical for much of the coastal areas in South Asia, including Eastern parts of India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka (Dixon et al., 2001). As a result, the findings of this study are likely most applicable to the above locations than other parts of South Asia. This is due to the comparable agro-climate and similarities with regard to agricultural practices, demographics, and other socioecological factors.This study aimed to elucidate farm change trajectories and likely factors/drivers influencing changes in the farming systems of Bangladesh's central coast using a novel systems analysis approach. We presented a new framework for analyzing farm trajectories using longterm panel data. While we adopted both fixed and random effects models similar to Baltagi (2008), our approach was unique in that we employed data dimensionality reduction techniques, hierarchically clustered farm typology analysis, and examined how they changed over time. We also extracted the underlying latent factors that helped explain what drives change over time using panel data modelling. The conceptual model and the analysis provided here illustrate how it is meaningful to consider a wide range of socioecological system properties potentially influencing agricultural intensification, rather than singling out macro-drivers such as population pressure as the primary metric of agrarian change and intensification.Our approach, which can be adapted to other farming systems and geographies, showed that coastal farming systems exhibit farm type dynamics that are spatially and temporally diverse. With several socioecological drivers as key influencers of change, farming systems in our study area have gradually moved from heterogeneous, rice-livestock based farm types into more homogenous farm types with less livestock and increased emphasis on income generated from pulses, aquaculture and off-farm employment. Evidence also suggests that farm typological diversity has decreased within and outside of polders. Marginal-and small-sized farms now dominate compared to a more diverse mix of marginal to large farm types twenty years before. We have shown the influence of both micro-and meso-level factors in addition to macro-level drivers (e.g. population and cyclone intensity) in driving changes in cropping intensity. The inundation class to which farmland belongs had a positive influence on cropping intensities of the studied areas, reinforcing the requirement for both post-monsoon field drainage and clearing existing drainage canals to facilitate winter season cropping. Finally, the environmental risk posed by cyclones had a negative influence on both cropping intensities and off-farm income activities in the area.These topics, however, have not been adequately dealt with through policy, which has instead focused on promoting boro rice cultivation. Our data clearly indicate that this approach is less appealing for farmers. Rather than focusing on boro rice cultivation in the winter season, the development of stress tolerant mungbean varieties and extension support to improve nutrient management may be beneficial, alongside efforts to improve in-field drainage to facilitate early winter season land preparation. Setting these issues aside, pathways to catalyze intensification of these systems are also likely require efforts to ameliorate environmental risks posed by extreme weather, policy to improve sharecropping arrangements and land tenure security, alongside farming systems re-design that incorporates household's development aspirations and the attributes affecting their crop choices."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4199982101.json b/main/part_2/4199982101.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c125a4faa5993893b25927da8d3556ef5e69924 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4199982101.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"300364c0e86478391da27cae84f50ddf","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/df2f43f0-5eb1-405a-a3af-e2d4cdb2ae8d/content","id":"549326544"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"34ef32d4-49a4-42a8-af5f-54ea9bd3a46c","content":"The CIMMYT Maize Program Increasing the productivity of maize and maize farming systems in developing countries.Protecting the natural resources on which future productivity depends.The CIMMYT Maize Program ...• Provides a broad array of high yielding maize varieties, hybrids, and inbred lines targeted to developing country settings and able to withstand major environmental rigors such as infertile soils, drought, insect pests, and diseases. • Conducts crop and natural resource management research to exploit the full potential of improved seed and to preserve or enhance farmers' soil and water resources (in concert with the CIMMYT Natural Resources Group). • Generates and shares knowledge and techniques that make our research and that of partners more effective. This includes technical information and expertise in research planning, execution, and financing. • Offers a rich assortment of training opportunities in maize breeding and crop management research, including in-service courses, visiting scientist appointments, and post-doctoral fellowships. Helps establish and support myriad global, regional, and national training initiatives (courses, workshops, conferences, etc.). • Maintains and fosters the use of extensive collections of maize genetic resources for the benefit of humanity and helps others involved in this work.The Maize Program comprises three subprograms, each focusing on a major maize production ecology (the lowland tropics, the subtropics and midaltitude regions, and the highlands), plus specialized research units (entomology, pathology, physiology, international testing, genetic resources) which provide cross-Program support. About half our staff are based at CIMMYT headquarters and several research stations in Mexico; the rest are posted to offices in the chief maize-producing regions of the developing world and work directly with research partners in the countries we serve.Guatemala City, Guatemala --Research focusing on hillside and lowland tropical maize systems of Central America and the Caribbean.Cali, Colombia --Work to develop and disseminate varieties and hybrids for acid savannas and hillsides of South America, Africa, and Asia; research on major diseases of maize in Latin America.Addis Ababa, Ethiopia --Developing hybrid-oriented maize for the highlands of Eastern Africa.Nairobi!Njoro, Kenya --Research on crop management strategies to fully exploit the potential of improved germplasm for Eastern Africa; the development of lowland tropical maize that resists maize streak virus; support to a crop management research training center for maize specialists of Eastern and Southern Africa. Bangkok, Thailand --Research on maize that resists downy mildew and meets the growing demand for improved varieties and hybrids for Asia; support to a crop management research training center for maize specialists of the region.,.,The CIMMYT Maize Program's earliest work focused on collecting, characterizing, and preserving samples of native maize seed from Mesoamerica. Beginning in 1966 and continuing through the 1970s, the Program ...• Established experiment stations in Mexico to represent the major maize growing ecologies in developing countries. • Formed broad-based genetic pools of maize for the tropics.• Launched a worldwide network for testing and distributing experimental seed.• Regionalized efforts to address local needs more effectively.• Conducted research to develop high-protein maize varieties known as \"quality protein maize\" (QPM).During the 1980s hybrid research was begun in response to the growing demand for such products from our partners. In the 1990s, the Program has strengthened these efforts, sought innovative partnerships for developing and delivering products, and explored the potential of biotechnology to facilitate breeding and tap new sources of genetic diversity.Among our more recent research advances are the discovery of sources of resistance to stored grain pests and incorporation of this trait into breeding stocks. Parallel selection under both optimal and controlled stress conditions, an approach tested by the physiology unit to develop drought-and low-nitrogen tolerant maize, is now applied in crop improvement work throughout the Program and is being promoted with research partners, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Finally, our current priorities reflect several broad concerns of each major maize-producing region ... Asia --Cropping intensification and an explosion in the demand for maize (mainly for animal feed).Sub-Saharan Africa --Marginal production conditions and a rising demand for maize as human food.Latin America --Cropping intensification and a resulting increase in disease incidence.Under the terms of a 1994 agreement with the FAQ, the Maize Program preserves and makes available some 14,000 collections of seed of maize and related species in CIMMYT's Wellhausen-Anderson Genetic Resources Center (GRC), built in 1996 with funding from Japan, and works with research partners worldwide to foster the conservation and use of maize genetic resources ... The Program distributes maize, teosinte, and Tripsacum seed for the benefit of producers and consumers in developing countries. This seed is freely available to researchers worldwide, so that it reaches as many farmers in the developing world as possible.The chief means of distribution is an international testing program in which experimental seed is sent to hundreds of cooperators in dozens of countries each year. CIMMYT also ships considerable seed in response to requests from the scientific community."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4211707320.json b/main/part_2/4211707320.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3053751e7d76489237dda3638bfc8c2e4d3d0174 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4211707320.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7befc89e295789914e0a97c3fdb57e9a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/70d8304d-eb24-4384-a50b-c05d31d400a5/content","id":"388549871"},"keywords":["Africa south of Sahara","food production","food supply","Zea mays","fertilizers","fertilizer application","innovation adoption","economic environment","economic policies","price policies","credit policies. AGRIS category codes: E14","E16 Dewey decimal classification: 338.16"],"sieverID":"9511862d-67f5-4324-858f-c69a776a90c7","content":"CIMMYT is an internationally funded, nonprofit scientific research and training organization. Headquartered in Mexico, the Center is engaged in a research program for maize, wheat, and triticale, with emphasis on improving the productivity of agricultural resources in developing countries. It is one of several nonprofit international agricultural research and training centers supported by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), which is sponsored by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank), and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The CGIAR consists of some 40 donor countries, international and regional organizations, and private foundations.CIMMYT receives core support through the CGIAR from a number of sources, including the international aid agencies of Australia,. Fertilizer consumption in sub-Saharan Africa 8 Table 2. Effect of price policy on the profitability of alternative maize technologies in 110 onfarm demonstrations, Lilongwe, Malawi, 1990 and1991 11 Table 3. Ratio of farm-level prices of nitrogen fertilizer to maize grain prices in sub-Saharan Africa and other regions, 1989In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), population growth will continue to outstrip growth in food production for a long time to come unless serious action is taken to accelerate agricultural productivity. Between now and the year 2000, population in SSA is expected to grow at a rate of more than 3% per year, while food production is likely to grow at a rate of 2% or less per year. By the year 2000, the production shortfall in SSA is estimated to increase to about 50 million tons of grain equivalent-up from the current level of about 14 million tons (von Braun and Paulino 1990). The World Bank (1989) estimates that by the year 2020, Africa will have a food shortage of 250 million tons. Furthermore, the region will not have the necessary foreign exchange to import such large amounts of food, nor will the African governments be able to count on enough food aid to make up the difference. Even if importing food were financially viable, most countries in SSA lack the infrastructure (ports, roads, trucks, distribution networks, and so on) to handle it efficiently.In general, low-input systems are characterized by relatively low land productivity. In terms of long-term sustainability and returns to land and labor, however, extensive low-input systems tend to be highly efficient. To grow enough food to feed an increasing population from these systems, farmers have to expand cultivated area, moving onto marginal lands ofWilfred Mwangi lower quality; these lands tend to be easily degraded (Matlon and Spencer 1984). Also, many parts of Africa are extremely land-scarce, despite the appearance of land-abundance (Binswanger 1986;Matlon 1987b;Binswanger and Pingali 1988). Intensification would reduce the need to cultivate marginal lands. Moreover, high-input systems would restore fertility via fertilizer (Matlon 1987a;Wong et al. 1991), especially in areas where nutrient depletion is the major soil degradation problem.Population increases and land scarcity indicate that SSA's food needs cannot be met through the low-input systems that are based largely on traditional practices; instead, much more will be required from farmers in terms of labor, knowledge, and skill (Borlaug and Dowswell 1994). Furthermore, for the world as a whole, a shift from the currently known best practice for completely organic sources of nutrients would result in a food shortfall of about 40% (Smil 1991).This paper examines the factors related to the low use of fertilizer and the resulting low agricultural productivity in SSA. The importance of fertilizer and of improving soil fertility and agricultural research are outlined first. Next, demand factors that influence adoption decisions and the intensity of fertilizer use are summarized. The subsequent section focuses on supply constraints to fertilizer use and the privatization of supply.Infrastructure development and conclusions are discussed in the final sections.Fertilizer is a critical input for improving production technologies and increasing crop yields. Over the past 25 years, chemical fertilizers have been the primary means of enhancing soil fertility in small-farm agriculture (Byerlee et al. 1994). Estimates suggest that in Asia and Latin America, chemical fertilizers are responsible for 50-75% of the increase in the food crop yield over the past two decades (Viyas 1983;Narayana and Parikh 1987). Also, given present knowledge, the rapid rate at which food production must increase in developing countries, and severe soil degradation, farmers probably have little choice but to depend heavily on external sources of nutrients in the foreseeable future (Desai 1990).Researchers and policy makers widely recognize the importance of fertilizers in accelerating the growth of food production in SSA (Bumb 1988). Mellor et al. (1987) give fertilizers the first functional priority for accelerating food production in the region. They suggest that, even with existing technologies, a 15% annual growth rate in fertilizer consumption is both possible and of great potential significance. However, given much of the evidence presented elsewhere in this paper, such increases do not seem feasible without large changes in infrastructure, institutions, and policies. Furthermore, based on the experience of other developing world countries, where aggregate fertilizer consumption has increased far more rapidly than in SSA, such expansion rates will not be easy to achieve in an economically efficient fashion (Heisey and Mwangi, forthcoming).Farmers in SSA use very low levels of fertilizer (Table 1). Average use in 1990 was 8.4 kg of fertilizer nutrients per ha of arable land and land under permanent crops. In that same year, the world average was 93 kg; for developing countries, the average was 81 kg (Gerner and Harris 1993). Fertilizer use in SSA does not come close to compensating for harvested nutrients (Vlek 1993).Slightly more than half of the fertilizer is used on cereals, particularly maize. Although the area of the other two important cereals (millet and sorghum) is also large, very little of this area is fertilized, and when it is, application rates are low (Gerner and Harris 1993). In general, fertilizer use has shifted from cash crops to cereals, particularly maize, over the past 20 years (Heisey and Mwangi, forthcoming).Shifting cultivation and fallowing have been the traditional method of maintaining soil fertility and replenishing nutrients in SSA (Blackie and Jones 1993;Blackie 1994a;Spencer 1994). However, due to increased population pressure in most areas, fallowing has disappeared from the system in some areas and is declining in others. The shortening of fallow cycles-without adequate replenishment of soil nutrients through the use of organic and inorganic inputs-has caused yields to decline over time (Ehui et al. 1994).In SSA, grain yields average about a third of those in East Asia. Differences in land quality are part of the reason, but so too is SSA's low fertilizer use-less than one-fifth of East Asia's average (World Development Report 1992).Given the low levels of fertilizer use in SSA and the demonstrated contribution of fertilizers to increasing crop yields and land productivity, the increased use of fertilizers has great regional potential for boosting food production and promoting agricultural development. a Application rates per actual cropped area may be higher. Source: World Development Report (1994).that will promote the adoption and increased use of fertilizers by small-scale farmers (Baanante and Thompson 1988).Low fertilizer use results in declining soil fertility; it also increases soil degradation through nutrient mining (Byerlee et al. 1994;World Development Report 1992). For the foreseeable future, \"the environmental consequences of continued low use of fertilizers\" through nutrient mining and increased use of marginal lands \"are more inevitable and devastating than those anticipated from increased fertilizer use\" (Dudal and Brynes 1993;Matlon and Spencer 1984;World Development Report 1992).In general, soil fertility is on a downward spiral, with inputs of nutrients (from organic and inorganic sources) into sedentary agriculture insufficient to reverse the trend. Estimated rates of net nutrient depletion are high, exceeding 30 kg of nitrogen (N) and 20 kg of potassium (K) per hectare of arable land per year in Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe (Stoorvogel et al. 1993). 1From 1988 to 1990, fertilizer use in Ghana averaged about 11,000 nutrients tons; 90,000 nutrient tons were removed by various crops.The implications for Ghana are clear: depletion of soil nutrients is becoming a serious constraint to soil fertility and crop productivity. Moreover, the level of depletion suggests that large amounts of fertilizers are needed to maintain soil fertility (Bumb et al. 1994).Declining soil fertility has been identified as one of the most significant constraints to increasing food production in SSA. This is true even in the highlands of eastern Africa Furthermore, increased and efficient fertilizer use can help reverse the declining trends in per capita cereal production experienced in many SSA countries, without having adverse environmental consequences (Bumb 1991). But this potential can only be realized through sound government policies and investments (traditionally the region's most productive and fertile lands) due to human population pressure and intensification in land use (Waddington and Ransom 1995). Adequate and timely fertilizer applications will not only supply necessary nutrients and improve crop yields, but will also provide relatively higher amounts of crop residue, which can be used as organic matter to improve soil health and prevent soil degradation (Bumb 1991). Wong et al. (1991) have also urged the promotion of judicious fertilizer use in West Africa, use which, they contend, will enhance agricultural production while protecting the fragile environment. Byerlee et al. (1994) Conroy and Kumwenda 1994), and on some depleted communal lands in Zimbabwe, hybrid maize will yield nothing without fertilizer (Waddington and Ransom 1995).In some ecologies, continuous cropping of maize has led to degraded soil structure and micronutrient deficiencies, which, in turn, have led to a long-term decline in yields even where chemical fertilizer is used at relatively high levels (IITA 1991). Thus, it is important to seek a balanced approach to improving soil fertility, an approach that combines both organic and inorganic source of nutrients (Byerlee et al. 1994).The efficiency of chemical fertilizers and the long-term sustainability of yields can often be increased by adding organic matter from internal nutrient sources (e.g., green manures and farmyard manures), by employing reduced tillage techniques, and by alley crops (Spencer and Polson 1991;Matlon 1990;Low and Waddington 1991;Borlaug and Dowswell 1994). The review of the considerable literature on long-term fertility trials conducted in SSA has indicated the long-term yield benefits of combining organic and inorganic soil amendments (McIntire et al. 1992). Successful intensification will need to combine such soil management with greater use of inorganic fertilizers, which provide about 40% of the nutrients for the world's crops (World Development Report 1992). This is particularly critical in arid areas where, in most cases, organic material has virtually disappeared from the soil due to extraction and decomposition. The use of fertilizers in combination with organic materials and soil conservation measures can increase the low yields of food grains common in these areas.However, as observed earlier, SSA lacks resource management technologies for maintaining soil fertility and increasing labor productivity. And even where research and extension systems have recommended improved soil and crop management technologies, adoption by small farmers has been virtually nil (Spencer 1994;Ehui et al. 1994). In general, low producer prices for crops and livestock in SSA have discouraged farmers from investing in natural resource conservation measures (Larson and Bromley 1993).As Vlek (1993) has rightly observed, however, \". . . failing to enhance fertilizer use in SSA might actually lead to an environmental disaster, as it will cause stagnation in economic development with millions of farmers trading their exhausted and irreversibly degraded lands for still remaining problem lands, leaving behind a denuded landscape.\"Farm-level studies show that technologies which employ green manure crops, composting, and animal manures to increase soil fertility in smallholder agriculture have largely been rejected because of the high labor demands and the variable quality of the product. There are also problems in producing the quantity of manures and composts needed to have a noticeable affect on soil fertility (Blackie 1994;Jones and Wendt 1994).Ehui et al. (1994) report that the benefits in improved soil quality, fertility, and crop yields are limited by the low output response of inputs such as manure, crop residues, and animal power. These inputs are also insufficient to replace the major nutrients mined from the soil by crop production.Although it is acknowledged that improved organic techniques of nutrient supply will contribute to soil health and productivity (Kumwenda et al., forthcoming), relying only on the efficient recycling of nutrients available in depleted soils will not generate the food production increases required in SSA (Janssen 1993).Future increases in food production must come primarily from higher yields per unit of land rather than from land expansion. Agricultural research must therefore continue to develop yield-enhancing production technologies targeted to specific agroecologies, especially on food crops. Research must also build tolerance of, or resistance to, pests and adverse climatic conditions.However, despite recent studies showing high rates of return to research that has produced new technologies (Oehmke and Crawford 1993) and to the extension systems that helped introduce such technologies to farmers (Bindlish and Evenson 1993), investment in research is declining. This trend must be reversed if SSA is to meet its food needs. A long-term research strategy will require substantial public-sector involvement, which in turn will require higher, not lower, investments in agricultural research (Heisey and Mwangi, forthcoming). 2In most areas of SSA, declining soil fertility is a major limiting factor to food production.Policies that support long-term agricultural research are crucial to developing a fertilizer sector capable of overcoming this problem. Implicit in the often-repeated injunction that \"the right fertilizer be available at the right time in the right place\" is the assumption that the \"right fertilizer\" is known. Agricultural research is the foundation upon which such determinations are made.Soil fertility and fertilizer research should receive high priority and research on organic sources of nutrients must be encouraged and strengthened. Some have argued that continued research investment should be directed toward the low-potential and problem areas of SSA in order to arrest soil degradation and promote efficient types of extensive farming; however, fertilizer should probably fertilizer use. So far, limited research has shown that by using better agronomic and management practices and improved fertilizer products, many farmers can achieve significantly higher crop output from the same level of nutrient use (Bumb 1991).It is important to emphasize that the process of developing research recommendations, making them consistent with policy, and turning them into more effective (and often more complicated) extension advice is far from satisfactory for most countries in SSA (Heisey and Mwangi, forthcoming).Demand and supply factors are hard to separate when evaluating farmers' decisions to adopt fertilizer and their subsequent decisions about application rates. For example, many of the key influences discussed in the adoption literature (farm size, access to credit, membership of cooperatives, contact with extension, access to outside information, availability of inputs, distance to markets) may be related at least as much to supply side constraints as to farmer demand (Mwangi 1995). Furthermore, in Kenya and some other nations, fertilizer consumption tends to be higher where input supply networks are well developed. In some cases, however, it is difficult to establish whether poorly developed input supply channels are demand-driven (arising from factors such as unattractive returns, lack of credit, and poor technical knowledge) or supply-driven. In this not play a major role in strategies for lowpotential areas, particularly those for which increasing soil organic matter would be problematic under any circumstances (Vleck 1993).In Malawi, research into alley cropping maize with Leucaena leucocephalla has demonstrated that organic fertilizers can increase maize yields, although the biggest yield increase was obtained when both inorganic and organic fertilizers were applied together (Jones and Wendt 1994). Experiments conducted by IFDC and ICRISAT at Sadore and Gobey in Niger have demonstrated that the addition of up to 20 t/ha of manure could result in as much millet production as when chemical fertilizers are used. However, managing such quantities of organic materials is labor-intensive and requires tools not now possessed by the peasant farmer (Bationo and Mokwunye 1991).Bationo and Mokwunye have also demonstrated that the addition of crop residue plus fertilizer increased millet yields 15-fold over the control. 3 Lynam and Blackie (1991) underlined the importance of crop and resource management research to overcome seasonal labor constraints, while conserving the soil base and enhancing soil fertility over the long run. They contend that this type of research will assume a major role in increasing the productivity and sustainability of maize-based cropping systems. However, such research is very sitespecific and more detailed micro-level research will be needed to define appropriate strategies for each location (Lele et al. 1989). More research is also needed on the efficiency of subsection, we focus on factors influencing demand for fertilizer; in the next subsection, we turn to supply factors.The demand for fertilizers is derived from the demand for agricultural products. The factors that affect and determine agricultural production and the demand for fertilizers may be classified as (1) climatic variables, (2) soil characteristics, and (3) economic and social variables. In conjunction with the knowledge and experience of farmers, these factors affect decisions about the use of resources for agricultural production (crops and cropping systems) and the use and management of fertilizers and other variable inputs (Baanante and Thompson 1988).Low use of fertilizer has been partly attributed to weak or nonexistent crop responses, partially because of variable rainfall, poor soil quality, an absence of irrigation, and a lack of improved crop cultivars (McIntire et al. 1992).Under rainfed conditions, maize in Africa tends to be more fertilizer responsive than other cereals, with the possible exception of rice (Heisey and Mwangi, forthcoming). This is undoubtedly one of the reasons maize production appears positively linked with fertilizer consumption. 4 The \"agronomic efficiency\" (fertilizer use efficiency) for maize ranges from 5 to 25 kg grain or more per 1 kg nutrient. A cursory examination of response data for maize in other developing countries (India, Mesoamerica) reveals no marked difference from African response data (Heisey and Mwangi, forthcoming).Economics of fertilizer use -The economics of using chemical fertilizer on maize is highly site-specific, depending on land pressure, agroclimatic variables, fertilizer costs, and farm gate maize prices (Byerlee et al. 1994). Anderson (1992) has hypothesized that most of the recommended technologies, including chemical fertilizer use, are not more profitable than existing practices, given the constrained resources of affected farmers.In Malawi, a recent program of 110 on-farm demonstrations over two years in one district found that it is economical for food-deficit households to use fertilizer on local maize, although fertilizer use on hybrid maize at recommended doses provided even higher returns (Table 2); Malawi has the highest N:grain price ratio in Table 3. If the fertilizer subsidy were removed, however, fertilizing local maize varieties would not be economically efficient. 5 Even for hybrid maize, returns to fertilizer use are less than the 100% rate of return usually assumed to be the minimum required for small-scale farmers to adopt this type of technology widely (Table 2).A similar situation has been observed for maize in Tanzania, where for farmers the profitability of fertilizer use is low, especially in interior locations where the high cost of transport reduces effective maize prices and increases the price of chemical fertilizers (Lele 1992).An important consideration for those with small farms and little cash is the possible risk of using fertilizer. But in favorable growing conditions like those of Malawi, risk is not an important factor in many farmers' decisions to accept or reject the seed-fertilizer technology (Smale et al. 1991). However, in marginal production areas with a high yield risk of drought, the yield risk of fertilizer use increases substantially. Results from marginal maizegrowing areas of Kenya, where soils are highly degraded, indicate that rainfall risk is probably a key factor in the low rate of fertilizer adoption (McCown et al. 1992).Price instability and input supply problems often pose a greater risk for fertilizer users than yield risk per se (Byerlee et al. 1994). In general, price instability leads to lower investment in new technologies such as those that employ fertilizer (Timmer 1993). It has also been observed that uncertainty in the profitability of fertilizer represents a serious disincentive to fertilizer adoption and use on staple crops (Vlek 1990). 6Availability -Although the factors affecting fertilizer availability are often referred to as nonprice factors, they can be accommodated within a pricing framework by noting that in effect they raise the shadow price of fertilizers to farmers. A major constraint to technology adoption in much of Africa is the physical unavailability or untimeliness of inputs. On whether fertilizer use is limited more by supply or demand, Pinstrup-Andersen (1993) notes that in most cases farmers' limited access to the right kind of fertilizer at the right time was probably just as important a constraint as price. One study of farmers' reasons for not following the extension recommendations developed through adaptive on-farm research in Zambia found that in 44% of the cases inputs simply were not available (Low and Waddington 1991).6 But despite this problem, fertilizer use on cereals has increased, particularly for maize. a Subsidy of 25% on fertilizer and about 40% on hybrid seed. b The price of maize in households that purchase maize is about 40% above the farm gate selling price. c Marginal rate of return on input expenditures. A return above 100% is usually assumed to be necessary for widespread farmer adoption.Price policies and credit -Many countries in SSA have promoted fertilizer use through price and/or credit subsidies. The high cost of fertilizer in SSA is the main justification for maintaining subsidies. Other reasons include compensating for low output prices, uncertainty about the profitability of fertilizer, promoting adoption, making fertilizer more readily available to small farmers (thus fulfilling an equity goal), and the high cost of capital in informal markets (Byerlee et al. 1994;Pinstrup-Andersen 1994;Vlek 1990).Shalit and Binswanger (1985) have outlined three theoretical cases for fertilizer subsidies.The best theoretical case is to promote the learning of a new technology that will in time be socially profitable. Compensation for an export tax (more likely to apply to cash crops) is another theoretical argument. Yet another is that if there is a policy goal of food selfsufficiency, fertilizer subsidies may be more effective than output price subsidies; given other policy goals, fertilizer subsidies might seem somewhat less attractive.Some policy analysts would contend that other arguments, such as compensating for the high cost of capital, are best addressed by improving financial intermediation, not by subsidizing fertilizer. It is also debatable whether high prices are best countered by subsidies or by trying to address the underlying causes of the high prices. Perhaps a middle ground would be to look at both alternatives as important, with their relative roles changing over time. Other arguments might also be geographically specific. For example, temporary fertilizer subsidies would seem more justifiable for Malawi than for Nigeria.In recent years, governments in SSA have been pressured by the World Bank, IMF, and other donors through structural adjustment programs (SAPs) to remove fertilizer subsidies.In countries where such actions have been taken, overall national demand for fertilizers has been substantially weakened, at least in the short run (Vlek 1990). Waddington and Ransom (1995) indicate that for most countries in the region, SAPs have eliminated price subsidies and reduced the availability of credit for inorganic fertilizer inputs and seed. This creates a great deal of uncertainty for farmers and for the research and extension services that support them. However, it also creates new opportunities (such as potential availability of a wider range of micronutrient fertilizers). Nevertheless, the short-to medium-term consequences of SAPs are that smallholder farmers will apply even less N and phosphorus (P) fertilizers and will use less hybrid maize seed because of real price increases at the farm gate.In Nigeria, Smith et al. (1994) indicate that removing the fertilizer subsidy is expected to reduce the profitability of maize, while reduced fertilizer use levels will necessitate major changes in soil maintenance practices in a production system that relies heavily on fertilizer for maintaining soil fertility. In Senegal the reduction in fertilizer subsidies has led to declining demand for fertilizer (Shepherd 1989). In Malawi and Cameroon, some contend that removing the subsidy will reduce fertilizer use by women farmers, whose use of fertilizers is already low (Gladwin 1992).In Ghana, removing fertilizer subsidies in the absence of credit and remunerative output prices has resulted in falling demand for the input (Kwandwo Asenso-Okyere 1994). A study from Nigeria, where fertilizer is subsidized heavily, showed that chaotic and untimely supply was one of the most salient reasons for non-adoption (Daramola 1989). In this case, continuing the fertilizer subsidy appears unjustified on either efficiency or equity grounds. However, others have argued that despite the supply problems, the fertilizer subsidy undoubtedly assisted the adoption and expansion of maize (Smith et al. 1994).A strong case can be made for fertilizer subsidies-especially for phosphate fertilizers-to restore and sustain soil fertility.But although SSA has plenty of phosphate rock reserves, these have not been exploited due to high investment costs, low phosphate prices, foreign exchange shortages, and limited skilled manpower (Bumb and Baanante 1995).Given the very low levels of fertilizer use, the high prices, and the fact that most countries in SSA are pursuing the policy of food selfsufficiency, there will be theoretical arguments for continued fertilizer subsidies in the short and medium terms. Furthermore, we have seen that, in most cases, removing the subsidy significantly reduces fertilizer use.Besides subsidies, government-sponsored credit programs have commonly been used to promote input adoption, often by providing inputs in kind at low or negative real interest rates (Byerlee et al. 1994). While such programs have sometimes stimulated input adoption by a significant proportion of farmers (Kimuyu et al. 1991), adoption has usually been achieved at a high cost, and the programs have not been sustainable over the long term (Adams et al. 1984;Eicher and Rukuni 1992). Moreover, credit programs have tended to be monopolized by more powerful rural political groups and male farmers (Gladwin 1992) and are difficult to administer. In 1994, Malawi's fertilizer use decreased to less than 70,000 tons, compared to 180,000 tons in 1992/93. This reduction was caused by the collapse of the smallholder credit system (Conroy and Kumwenda 1994). It should be noted, however, that this system was, prior to its collapse, a relatively efficient one (as indicated by high repayment rates and other measures).Government-sponsored credit schemes featuring group lending, credit extended by traders, and effective rural financial intermediation based on small community savings and credit schemes have all been proposed as solutions to farmers' liquidity problems. But experience with government schemes has been disappointing (Eicher and Kupfuma, forthcoming). To date, however, experience with and analysis of other ways to provide smallholders with credit have been limited.Other important elements in an environment conducive to technology transfer are producer price incentives and stability (Byerlee et al. 1994). In some cases, distortions in producer prices are the major factor limiting technology adoption. In Ethiopia, fertilizer use on maize was uneconomic at any level under prevailing maize prices. If maize prices were to reflect import prices at a realistic exchange rate, however, fertilizer would become an attractive investment (Legesse Dadi et al. 1992).In Ethiopia, consumption of chemical fertilizers averaged 50,000 tons during the 1980s. Major growth in fertilizer use occurred after 1991: consumption doubled (to 113,000 tons) and then rose to 160,000 tons in 1992 due to liberalization of the grain market (World Bank 1994). But in Kenya, liberalization has been less encouraging: fertilizer use peaked at 271,000 tons of various products in 1988-1989 and declined steadily to 225,000 tons in 1991-1992. This decline occurred mainly because the government liberalized the fertilizer market but did not liberalize the grain market, especially that of maize (Sodhi 1993).SSA imports about 85% of the fertilizer it consumes (Vlek 1990). Fertilizer supply constraints are thus associated with importation, distribution, and pricing. Policies that affect these areas, along with a lack of infrastructure, are the main source of potential constraints to fertilizer supply.Farmers in SSA face very high fertilizer prices (Table 3). The price they pay for fertilizer, relative to the price they receive for their output, is thus much higher than in Asia. Some of the reasons for this high price result from SSA's dependence on fertilizer imports.Differences between world f.o.b. prices and landed cost tend to be twice as high in many sub-Saharan countries as compared to Asian countries (Shepherd and Coster 1987). Bumb (1988) indicates that this large difference is the result of the small volume of fertilizer that most African countries import; small volumes increase transportation costs and weaken the nations' position in negotiating for lower prices. Also, transportation costs are high because of poor physical infrastructure. Almost half of the 40 countries Bumb analyzed imported less than 5,000 tons of nutrients annually in the mid-1980s; only Nigeria imported more than 100,000 tons.In 1990, almost one-third of all fertilizer imports in SSA were financed by aid. For 21 countries, all fertilizer was financed through donor programs. 7 Donors impose conditions (such as limitations on origin, transporters, and fertilizer type) that can lead to excessive marketing costs and margins (Gerner and Harris 1993), which ultimately translate into high fertilizer prices.Another reason for high fertilizer prices in SSA is the high cost of distribution. These costs are higher by several fold than costs in Asia. For instance, in Sri Lanka, the distribution costs for urea averaged about US$ 45/ton, as against US$ 92/ton in Zambia and US$ 246/ton in Tanzania (Bumb 1988). Higher prices in SSA are the result of high transportation costs, which in turn are a consequence of poor physical infrastructure and the small volumes to be distributed. The cost of transport and marketing can increase the real farm-level price of imported fertilizer by up to 50% in a landlocked country such as Malawi, compared with the real farm-level price in a country like 7 Countries with relatively large fertilizer consumption levels-like Ethiopia, Kenya, Ghana, Malawi, and Tanzaniadepend primarily on aid-financed fertilizer (Gerner and Harris 1993). Source: CIMMYT (1990); Byerlee et al. (1994); Lele et al. (1989).Kenya, which has relatively good infrastructrue and ready access to a port.In Zimbabwe, Conroy (1990) reports that fertilizer use in communal lands has not kept pace with population growth since 1985although fertilizers, in terms of nutrient/crop price ratios, are cheaper in Zimbabwe than in other countries in the region (except Zambia). Moreover, the price of fertilizer relative to maize, cotton, and wheat prices has been falling over the last five years (Conroy 1990).The reasons for the limited use of inorganic fertilizer by communal farmers include problems of supply, the lack of an effective distribution network, and the absence of appropriate fertilizer recommendations. Consequently, one can conclude that fertilizer will remain a scarce and expensive commodity for communal farmers in Zimbabwe until distribution problems are resolved (Blackie 1994b).The inability of the public sector to operate fertilizer distribution systems efficiently and the absence of competition within the distribution network are additional reasons for high fertilizer prices (Pinstrup-Andersen 1993).Privatization of supply -The current response to fertilizer supply problems has been to urge the rapid privatization of the distribution system and the liberalization of fertilizer imports. The argument is based on experience in other parts of the world, which has shown that private enterprise is more effective in delivering improved technology to farmers and in developing marketing and credit institutions (Borlaug and Dowswell 1994). However, Vlek (1990) observes that although private enterprise appears better suited to handling fertilizer procurement, distribution, and marketing, dealers must be afforded a sufficient margin to cover investment and operating costs and to make profits if a nation is to have a dynamic private fertilizer distribution and marketing network.So far, experience with privatization has been mixed. In Ghana, fertilizer marketing channels have functioned poorly even after the privatization of supply and distribution. The scant participation of the private sector in the retailing, wholesaling, and importation of fertilizer has been attributed to the relative profitability of the enterprise from the narrow margins allowed by the Ministry of Agriculture (Kwandwo Asenso-Okyere 1994). Experience from Cameroon shows that once a market is developed, the private sector can import and deliver inputs at a lower cost, provided that the public sector provides market information and other appropriate supports (Truong and Walker 1990).Experience with privatizing the fertilizer trade underlines the importance of government in creating a favorable environment (i.e., eliminating constraints from government involvement). If mutual trust and confidence are to develop, both the short-and long-term roles of government and the private sector must be clearly spelled out (Sodhi 1993). Initially, fertilizer distributors may need to be trained. This is an important issue: governments consider fertilizer a strategic and politically sensitive commodity; thus, completely divesting their fertilizer interests to the private sector may prove politically sensitive (e.g., fertilizer shortages could affect national food security, which, in turn, could lead to political and social instability). Sodhi (1993) Infrastructural development -Fertilizer transportation accounts for the largest share of the difference in marketing margins between Asia and Africa. Reducing transportation and storage for a bulky input like fertilizer is essential if long-run consumption is ever to approach the social optimum. Investments in rural and agricultural institutions and rural infrastructure, especially rural/feeder roads should therefore be accelerated. Furthermore, public provision of legal and social infrastructure may also help to reduce the risks of fertilizer distribution (Ndayisenga and Schuh 1995). In Ghana, some have argued that reducing post-harvest losses, increasing the availability of effective storage structures, and improving transport infrastructure can increase the profitability of many crops, especially cereals, and serve as an incentive for increasing fertilizer use (Kwandwo Asenso-Okyere 1994). Such increases would reduce the price of fertilizer and eliminate the need for subsidies.The need for investments in roads is underscored by the fact that SSA has only 5 km of roads per 100 km 2 compared to 45 and 95 km of roads for the same area in Asia and industrialized economies, respectively (Vlek 1990). In Tanzania, poor feeder roads make primary marketing less efficient than secondary marketing because both private traders and cooperative societies refrain from trading in remote areas (Amani et al. 1992). In Iringa, Coulter and Golob (1991) have observed that, for villages 15-45 kilometers off the main highway, the cost of primary marketing (wholesale assembly) ranges from 9 to 40 times the cost of secondary marketing. Private traders do not go to such areas to buy farm produce. Poor roads thus prevent fertilizer from coming in and produce from going out. Similar experiences have been observed elsewhere in SSA (Makken 1991;Ehui et al. 1994).In SSA, farmers use low levels of fertilizer.Given that fact and the current state of knowledge, low-input systems are unlikely to increase food production rapidly, reverse the decline in rural incomes, and slow environmental degradation. Increases in food production must now come primarily from higher yields per unit of land rather than from land expansion. Historically, inorganic fertilizer has been a major component in achieving such increases.The profitability of applying inorganic fertilizers often varies due to the variations in crop response and the high and variable cost of fertilizer in relation to product prices. Fertilizer use is strongly affected by various policies, especially those that affect input supply and prices. In many areas of SSA, fertilizer adoption has been slowed by the absence of appropriate institutional structures to supply inputs, credit, and information.Public research and extension investments will also play an important role in increasing the profitability of fertilizer use for farmers in SSA.Even though research investments have generated high rates of return, support for research is declining. This trend must be reversed, and investments must be accelerated, if research is to continue developing inputresponsive and yield-stabilizing varieties while improving crop and resource management strategies. Research and extension investments offer an assured way to satisfy increased demands for food at reasonable prices, while avoiding irreversible degradation of the natural resource base.Without subsidies, farmers in SSA pay a very high price for fertilizer. Such prices occur in part because most of the fertilizers used in SSA are imported, and transportation costs are high.In the short and medium terms, fertilizer subsidies can help to compensate for these costincreasing factors.In the long-term, however, SSA must find other ways to make the right type of fertilizer available at the right time, place, and price.Research can help to clarify what fertilizers work best in particular situations. In addition, regional cooperation in international fertilizer procurement (Vlek 1990;Pinstrup-Andersen 1993) would help offset problems associated with the small volume of fertilizer purchased by countries in SSA, volumes that do not take advantage of scale economies for purchasing and shipment. Governments in SSA consider fertilizer a strategic and politically sensitive commodity, however, and given their experience with regional cooperation, this kind of cooperation may not be feasible.The donor community (spearheaded by the World Bank and IMF) is encouraging governments to promote private enterprise and competition with respect to fertilizer imports and distribution. Thus far, the experience has been mixed. Future strategies should include a greater mix of public-and private-sector initiatives involving organizations throughout SSA's fertilizer sector. The roles of each partner, especially that of government, will have to be clearly spelled out. Governments must make national fertilizer policies and plans a part of the overall agricultural development strategy. Such efforts should produce more predictable policies and more stable institutions so that the private sector can develop the confidence necessary to invest in the fertilizer trade. The policies should ensure that sufficient price incentives exist to make fertilizer use profitable for farmers and suppliers. Credit, for instance, must be extended not only to farmers but to private traders as well.Poor rural infrastructure-especially rural/ feeder roads-is a major cause of high fertilizer prices. Governments must increase their investments in infrastructure if they are to increase agricultural productivity. Infrastructure development should be treated as a social cost and charged to a social overhead account in the national budget (Bumb and Baanate 1995).For fertilizer use to increase over the long term, political commitment to agriculture must be translated into investments that develop institutions and infrastructure. Such support will enable agriculture to play its crucial role in SSA's overall economic development."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4217837846.json b/main/part_2/4217837846.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d53224f0d97d351153275134d77f4e4785bba60 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4217837846.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"43c4d43d32e22e763f62de77e9de8c1a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/571e8eb1-706d-4cee-b6ad-6963652b9734/retrieve","id":"1083479950"},"keywords":["Other MELIA activity Food systems transformation and youth","A collaborative framing paper Commissioning Study","A4NH"],"sieverID":"62224576-8aff-4ab0-9595-b07635a69fdb","content":"Links to the Strategic Results Framework: Sub-IDOs:• Enhanced institutional capacity of partner research organizations "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4235717111.json b/main/part_2/4235717111.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..97ea1d1d67c19a60c38e8fb3785fbd37248720ac --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4235717111.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6f4121847d8c0e09b5df011d1af23013","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ec6b463d-97c7-407c-a1da-07f0e2086451/retrieve","id":"-819721927"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b9f5ba02-b699-46c3-80e0-f6d332083400","content":"The International Potato Center, also known as Centro Internacional de la Papa (CJP), is a Scientific Institution, autonomous and non-profit making, established by means of an agreement with the Government of Peru with the purpose of developing and disseminating knowledge for greater utilization of the potato as a basic food. International funding sources for technical assistance in agriculture are financing the Center.IV IThe following are excerpts from a speech given by Dr. Richard L. Sawyer, Director General of CIP, on April, 28, 1977 during CIP's Fifth Anniversary celebration.This week we are celebrating the Fifth Anniversary of the International Potato Center. New facilities are also being dedicated that have been constructed to help better respond to our mandate which is \"to rapidly develop, adapt, and expand the research necessary for the technology to solve priority problems limiting potato production in developing countries.\"In This association led to discussions concerning methods for exploiting the tremendous genetic wealth that existed in the Andean region of South America to help solve the world food problem which was becoming increasingly apparent during the late 1960 s.The Peruvian Government and agricultural officers of the Dutch, British and German embassies in Peru indicated an active interest in the development. The Rockefeller Foundation indicated they were willing to join its international Potato Program to what was being formed in Peru.In 1970 US-AID provided planning money for a two-year period to activate an International Potato Center.During this same period, the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) was being formed, starting with the four international centers already activated by the Ford-Rockefeller Foundations and with the possibility of adding additional centers as justified.In 1972 CIP became the first new center to join the CGIAR network and fitst funding as an international center was received in mid-1972. There are now 11 international centers in the network of the CGIAR.To identify the priority research problems for potato production and improvement in developing countries.To identify to what extent funding would permit CIP's involvement with these problems.To involve through research contracts and international planning conferences as many institutions as possible around the world where facilities and capabilities already existed for helping solve the priority problems for potato improvement in developing countries.To develop regional locations on core program funding for the initial research transfer, the multiplication, evaluation, adaptation and redistribution to surrounding countries in order to get applicable technology to country doorsteps. To develop training programs at CIP headquarters and in the regional programs in order to have capable receivers of CIP technology within country programs.In mid-1972 upon receiving its first money as an International Center, CIP held an international planning conference entitled: \"Prospects for the Potato in the Developing World.\" Senior potato scientists from both developed and developing countries were brought to Lima to help determine what were the priority potato problems in developing countries and what research CIP should be initiating.As a result of these discussions, nine major research thrusts were identified as priority work. CIP's major research efforts are concentrated in these nine thrusts which are systematically evaluated through periodic international planning conferences and changed as indicated by progress and the identification of changes in priorities.From its initiation, CIP has attempted to get its roots into as many institutions as possible around the world to help with the development of needed technological packages and their transfer. The two principal strategies utilized are international planning conferences and research contracts.For each of the major research thrusts and their components, CIP holds an international planning conference every three years. These are rotated so that each year there are an average of three. At each conference a five-year plan for CIP activities is developed after taking into consideration the progress made and present status of research with the problem.A group of 10 to 15 senior scientists from developing countries working on the specific research problem are brought together for a week of discussions with CIP staff As a result of these conferences there tends to be a coordination of research activities among the institutions participating and CIP receives a great deal of research help at little if any direct cost.From its initiation, CIP established the policy of conducting a portion of its priority research for developing countries at institutions where facilities and capabilities already existed. Through such linkages CIP was able to move into breeding programs already underway, catalize them to an international dimension and have research material ready for distribution in a very short time. Contracts are with institutions where the facilities and scientists are already in place, and CIP provides funding for expandable supplies, extra technicians, and international travel to link the work directly to CIP and to developing countries. As specific pieces of work are completed, contracts are terminated and new ones initiated. Such a system gives excellent flexibility for changes in concentration as priorities change.Due to the problems encountered in the multiplication and distribution of a vegetatively propagated crop such as the potato, CIP has regionalized a portion of its core research program.Thus CIP has the ability on core program funding to get its technology into the various regions of the world for multiplication, evaluation, adaptation and redistribution to country program doorsteps. At this point CIP's direct responsibility stops. CIP's value will eventually be determined by the changes which have resulted in a countries food supply due to an association with CIP and the technology it has made available. This credibility must be established in the fields of potato growers in developing countries. This is where the final evaluation must take place. I would like to thank the many people that have been responsible for the institutional maturity which CIP has achieved in such a short time.First in importance is the faith and backstopping of donors who were willing to invest in a new approach to the establishment of an international center. Those donors over the past five years are listed in alphabetical order as follows: I would like to thank the scientists of international caliber who were willing to leave secure and comfortable positions in established institutions to join this CIP venture. We presently have 16 nationalities representing all major continents on the staff I would also like to thank a Board of Trustees, all of whom were working members devoting several weeks a year without pay to help in CIP's development and management. We have an international Board of Trustees with no more than two members at a time from any country. Two of the board members have been active since before the initiation of CIP, Dr. \"Wariano Segura of the /\\ilinistry of Food and Dean Jack Rigney of North Carolina State University and deserve special attention at this inauguration as they will be retiring as of this week.They have served as President and Secretary of the Board of Trustees for the past five years.And last but not least, a very special recognmon must go to the Peruvian Government for their f~ne cooperation, the donation of our original building which helped catalyze interest of the CC/AR, the donation of land in several locations in Peru, on the coast. in lfuancayo and in the jungle, and the excellent support of the many Ministries in clearances necessary for managing an international operation headquartered in Peru.Special thanks must go to the fine cooperation which has been established with the National Agrarian University, the Experimental Station in La Molina, and the staff of CRIA L In summary, we at CIP are announcing today what has been established in the past five years and is already helping improve the potato around the world. We go where opportunity exits. We do not push ourselves anywhere.CIP and its staff are nearby and waiting.Unless we are utilized, Lrnless our technology is bcinµ; tried and ei:aluatcd in the fields of growers in your countries, we are wor/dng in vain. On(v throngh association with developi11g country 11roµ;rarns and tlze bilateral agencies helping them can CIP technology for 11otato improvement get illto growers fields and the inuestmenl in this center be justified. C/P's institutional development as a Center fzas been completed (faring /:he initial five years. 011ring the second .five _vear period, the relevance of CJP to the world food problem and world nutrition needs must be established effectively.In the area of the world where 1101mlation and food are a major problem, the potato is mainly a luxurv vegetable. J.f CLP is to br relevant. the technology nwst be dcvelo11ed to make the polalo a lowcost food for sttbsistance growers in Southeast L~ia who possibly may have no more than 50 potato 11lants growing i11 their µ;ardc11 along with other vegetables. The value of the potato nutritionallv is already well established as is its an•cplalJility as a food among most cultures. The r11wlity of potato 11rotein is superior to all other major f!lant foods. The role the potato could {Jlay in lwlancing diets, if ii l>ecomes arailalilc as a low-cost food, ncepropriate concentrations it can completely inhibit binding of EPS to the lectin.However, competition studies have shown that EPS has higher specificity for binding sites on the lectin and that it displaces LPS. These results support the hyphothesis that EPS is an effective inhibitor of bacterial attachment to cell walls because it has greater affinity than LPS for the binding site on the lectin. Antisera to potato lectin has been obtained by injection of purified preparations in,to New Zealand rabbits. An antiserum specific for the lectin is being used in an effort to locate lectin in potato tissues. Also this antiserum should prevent the hypersensitive reaction if lectins bind vjrulent B-1 type P. solanacearum cells before the reaction is induced.Efforts have been made to establish the relationship between the agglutinating properties of lectins extracted from different potato clones and the resistance of these clones to bacterial wilt. This involves the extraction of lectins from each clone, their purification and assay against a wj.de range of isolates of P. solanacearum. Lectins were purified from six bacterial wilt resistant clones and tested against five strains of the pathogen representing a wide spectrum of races and biotypes.In general the most resistant clones produced lectins able to agglutinate all \"fluidal\" strains of the bacterium. The following synoptic assignment of J;lriorities was expanded into detailed recommendations to serve as guidelines for a 5-year CIP virus research program (Table 10). PLRV Potatq leaf roll virus (PLRV) is CIP's .first priority in breeding and testing for resistance to viruses. Work continued with two potato populations established last year for the development of infection resistance through phenotypic recurrent selectiOn, one tetraploid and one diploid. The material containing PLRV resistance was taken from several sources: true seed of diploid and tetraploid crosses from Germany, as well as, tetraploid material from England, Canada and the Netherlands; and, breeding lines and cultivars with high levels of resistance from selection programs in eight different countries in North and South America and Europe. The other major sauces of crosses for the two populations were the CIP germ plasm collection and neo-tuberosum material from Cornell University with resistance to PVY + PVA and to PVX. These latter sources were incorporated into the tetraploid population.The material grown under long-day conditions in northern regions flowered poorly under short-day conditions in Peru, reducing the material's direct usefulness in breeding.A notable feature of the groups of resistant breeding lines and cultivars received from Scotland, Canada and Germany was that a proportion of each group developed strnng secondary leaf roll symptoms when grown under CIP conditions. The possibility exists that these suscepts were infected with strains of the virus which do not reveal symptoms under conditions of origin.Screening for resistance to PLRV in clonal material is being conducted by exposing rooted cuttings to infective aphids in the greenhouse, as previously described (page 36, CIP Annual Report, 1976). The cuttings are then transplanted to the field and observed for symptom development.Secondary symptoms develop directly. Table> 11 gives the resu Its of a tria in which cuttings of six Peruvian cuitivars were tested. It is of interest thal when single tubers from each of the evidently healthy Ccompis plants were replanted, 23 percent showed typical secondary symptoms.The necessitv of confirming resistance by planting tubers from evidently healthy cuttings is apparent. A further refinement of screening for PLRV resistance in seedlings avoids the necessity of transplanting to the field and consequent losses due to fungi.In large-scale tests, open-pollinated seed of cultivars were sown in rows in trays of replicated blocks. When seedlings were 1-3 cm high, PL RV-infective aphids were placed directly onto each seedling. Two weeks later an insecticide was applied to kill the aphids. Seedlings were then transplanted to \"Jiffy\" pots and symptom readings were taken periodically.Distinct seedling symptoms developed and consisted of an upright habit, chlorosis of upper leaves, rolling of lower leaves and/or purpling of leaf undersides (i.e. typical secondary symptoms).In a preliminary trial, 30 of 33 seedlings of the susceptible variety \"Renacimiento\" developed symptoms, when only seven of 44 seedlings of the m'Ore resistant Ccompis had visible symptoms. The results of two further PLRV-seedling infection experiments are presented in Table 12. In Experiment 1, there were three replicate blocks with a total of 133-162 seedlings per cultivar; blocks were replicated four times in Experiment 2, with 82-234 seedlings per cultivar. Studies are underway to improve the reproducibility of direct aphid infection of sprouts' on tubers as a rapid method of screening clonal material. Included in these studies are more efficient techniques using complexes of chemicals to uniformly break dormancy. Small scale trials, using the resorcinol method for direct detection of PLRV in tubers, have not proven to be a useful alternative to making symptom readings in plants. Healthy tubers of some clones developed abundant, but apparently normal, levels of callose in the phloem.• New sources of resistance to PLRV continued to be monitored during 1977. For example, the native andigena cultivars (Table t2), including Hualash, Yana lmillia, Ccompis, Huagalina and Casa Blanca, appeared more resistant than Mi Peru, Merpata and Renacimiento. Infection resistance to PLRV of these five native cultivars may have played an important role in their survival as cultivars.Failure of Solanum brevidens to develop PLRV symptoms has been observed in England over a period of many years under optimal conditions for spread of this virus. In trials at CIP, it was confirmed that S. brevidens (Pl 218228) is highly resistant, but not immune, as a low level of virus can be detected in graft-inoculated plants.Similar resistance also appears to be present in S. femandezianum (Pl 320270) and S. etuberosum (Pl 245924).Clonal material consisting of breeding lines and cultivars with infection resistance to PLRV (and/or PVY) has been sent to 14 developing countries in six of seven CIP regions. Evaluation of seedlings from crosses for PLRV resistance continued at seven sites outside Peru, as previously described (page 36, CIP Annual Report, 1976).In contract research at Cornell University high levels of resistance to PLRV have been reported in clones K349-7 and NY61, the latter from a cross made in 1969. The pedigree of NY61 includes selections from Peruvian and Colombian seed lots. In five years of testing, NY61 in 10 trials, produced 13 percent more tubers than \"Katakdin\" which were greater than 5 cm diameter.In Cornell University contract research, mechanical inoculation at the seedling stage proved to be a reliable means of PVY transmission of the common New York strain. Of 641 tub x tub clones tested, 170 were resistant and 196 were susceptible. This fits a ratio of 13: 15, assuming random chromatid segregation and a single dominant gene conferring resistance.Plants that were resistant to mechanical transmission were also resistant when inoculated by aphids. TG determine the type of resistance, topgraft and approach-graft tests were made. Failure to recover the virus from inoculated resistant plants, by either grafting method, suggests that immunity is involved.The high level of resistance to PVY in andigena populations has resulted• in a decision to incorporate this resistance in all future andigena breeding cycles. In 1977 the Cornell PVY exposure plot consisted of 78 PVY resistant andigena clones from the sixth cycle planted in five-hill plots. Six showed typical PVY symptoms.Observations were also made on 660 two-hill plots of adg x tub and tub x adg hybrids which had resistant parents.Potato vjrus strain XH 8 , originally from Bolivia, is of special interest because it infects Gomphrena globosa without producing local lesions.XHB also breaks the resistance of the gene for PVX immunity fromIt is considered to belong to group two of Cockerkam's classification of PVX strains.At present studies are underway to challenge the immunity of USDA 41956 and of certain neo-tuberosum clones with PVXH 8 .In studies with new or little known viruses, characterization of Andean Potato Mottle Virus (APMV), Andean Potato Latent Virus (APLV) and Potato Virus T (PVT), were continued during 1977. APMV, a comovirus, causes severe symptoms in potatoes whereas APL V and PVT are normally mild or latent. APLV can cause severe symptoms in sensitive cultivars growing in cold conditions at high altitudes.Several new viruses of undefined importance were identified, two of which, 14R and Wild Potato Mosaic Virus (WPMV), were extensively studied. The physical characteristics of 14 R particles, the host range, sap transmission and serological relationship to tobacco mosaic virus, were determined. WPMV, isolated from Solanum chancayense growing in the Peruvian coastal desert, is not considered to be of economic importance because of a restricted host range in Solanum. WPMV appears to be the first virus studied from naturally infected wild potatoes. It represents a third PVY-type potato virus, in addition to PVY and PVA.The causal agent of the potato yellow vein disease (PYVV), which is a very common and important disease in Ecuador, was isolated for the first time by mechanical inoculation to Datura stramonium. The virus has been partially characterized.The advice of Dr. B. D. Harrison, Scottish Horticulture Research Institute, is gratefully acknowledged in studies of PYVV, APMV, T and 14 R viruses, and of Dr. R. Koenig, Institute for Virus Serology, Germany, for studies on APLV and APMV.Potato spindle tuber is caused by a viroid, a single-stranded ribonucleic acid particle withouf a protein coat, which is transmitted with usually low efficiency through pollen and ovary to botanical seed of the potato. The virus has been reported in Canada, USA, USSR, China, Poland, and Korea in potatoes, and in South Africa in tomatoes.ln contract research at Cornell University, the sensitivity of detection of PSTV by slab polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was evaluated against tomato challenge inoculation. While 25 samples could be tested by PAGE in a day and a half, up to eight weeks and considerable greenhouse space are required for the tomato challenge assay. In a test with 146 Cornell breeding lines for PSTV by both PAGE and tomato assay, results were in agreement in 123 case~.In 23 cases, results of the original tests were not in agreement; when 20 were tested a second time, results supported the original PAGE data in all but one case. It was concluded that the PAGE assay for PSTV is more rapid and reliable than the tomato bioassay.The antisera production project has the following objectives: 1) To produce antisera to the more common potato viruses in sufficient quantities for: a) distribution to national programs in developing countries, b) routine virus checks in the CIP seed program and in virus research, and, c) developing improved serological techniques for efficient detection of viruses in large scale seed programs; 2) To produce antisera to new or little known viruses affecting potato. The distribution of antisera to developing countries is summarized in Table 13. Sera are normally sent in concentrated form, mixed with glycerine and sodium azide, as preservative.Usually a sufficient quantity of sera for 1,000 to 2,500 tests with each virus is sent, accompanied by information sheets detailing the methodology used for microprecipitation and gel diffusion testing. Requests have also been met for antisera from several developed countries: for APLV, Canada, USA, Hungary; and, for PVX, PVY, PVS, TRSV and APLV, England and the Netherlands.Very high standards of virus testing are maintained at GIP to avoid export of infected material as either multi-meristem cultures, rooted cuttings or tubers. A schedule to test for viruses has been designed to ensure that material for export from Peru is as free from viruses as modern technology permits (Table 14). The different checks are always done at least one month apart. The indicator hosts used routinely are listed in Table 15.Routine serology checks are carried out with sera to PVX, PVY, PVS, APLV and APMV. Initially microprecipitation was used for the serological detection of PVX, PVY and PVS and gel diffusion for APLV and APMV. In August, 1977, a change was made to the latex method for al! five viruses. This test has the advantage of being more rapid, easier to read, uses less antisera and is considerably more sensitive than microprecipitation.In addition to the latex test, studies are continuing in a comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ELISA is demonstrably more sensitive than the latex test and is particularly useful in screening plantlets from tissue culture. With both the latex and ELISA tests, combined antisera can be used in serological assays. The use of single diffusion in agar, being relatively insensitive, has t1een discontinued. This instrument has a resolution of 3.4 angstroms (line to line) with a magnification to 200,000. The microscope has been erected on a seismic base. Initially the microscope is being used for the routine detection and identification of viruses. Planned use for other disciplines is also intended.Breeding and screening for resistance continued to receive major emphasis in nematode research during 1977, Research was confined to two species of cyst nematodes (Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida), to the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita acrita) and the false root-knot nematode (Nacobbus aberrans complex). Although pockets of cyst nematodes are found in restricted areas in many developing countries, the importance of cyst nematodes in the Andean zone has influenced research emphasis toward problems of this region. Rootknot nematodes tend to be cosmopolitan in warmer areas of the tropics.Two clones of Solanum andigena, 702535 and 702698, from the CIP germ plasm collection were rated highly resistant to the Huancayo cyst nematode population (G. pallida) and somewhat resistant to Otuzco and Cuzco populations (G. pallida), as well as a population from Puna (G. rostochiensis). This type of resistance has only been recently identified and is most likely broadly based.In intercrosses between partially resistant clones of S. andigena, it has been found possible to raise the level of resistance through strong selection among the progeny. Apparently \"minor\" genes are involved. Evaluation of resistance in plants grown from tubers has been shown to be more reliable than seedling assays. From 1,981 progeny derived from crosses of resistant and susceptible andigena clones, about one-third were rated resistant.Up to 80 percent of progeny with resistance to an Otuzco cyst nematode population was derived from clone 701422. About 10 percent of the progeny derived from clone 701478 were resistant to both the Otuzco and Cuzco populations.Possibly a more productive breeding approach for generalized resistance involves crosses between resistant S. andigena and resistant hybrids of wild clones x S. tuberosum (Table 16). Frost-resistant clones of S. acaule selected at CIP were screened for •resistance to Otuzco and Huancayo nematodes.Of 90 clones, H 474078-20, H 474078-30, H 474081-3HD and H 474083-ID were resistant to both cyst populations. In a separate study, dual resistance to Globodera . pallida and Synchytrium endobioticum (wart) was examined in 499 clones of S. tbr. ssp. andigena derived from crosses of six selected clones. Encouraging levels of dual resistance were found in some of the 274 clones with varying cyst nematode resistance.Field trials for tolerance to cyst nematode rather than resistance, were repeated in Chacon during 1977 in heavily infested plots (120 eggs/gm soil). Three clones each of tolerant, intolerant and control varieties in replicate plots, with and without a nematicide, were evaluated for yield.Under conditions of heavy cyst nematode infestation yield losses of less than 35 p_ercent were considered to be tolerant in comparison with nematicides treated controls (Fig. 5).Tolerance, being pathotype independent, when combined with resistance is of practical value where cyst nematodes are widespread and pathotypes are diverse. Results showed that the Andean populations of nematodes have a wider variability than the European populations and are able to overcome H genes. Gene H 3 reduces reproduction of the Huancayo and Otuzco populations and appears to be similar to the partial resistance of some G. pallida populations identified in the germ plasm collection.When some populations were tested using cuttings of Maris Piper (H 1 genes, ex-andigena) and other varieties containing H 2 and H 3 genes, the presence of G. rostochiensis pathotypes which overcame the H 1 resistance gene were identified in populations from Peru, Bolivia and Italy. Populations of G. pallida on plants with H 2 and H 3 genes beh!3ved variably with many populations reproducing freely.Both intrinsic genetic variation, environmental factors and measurement techniques can contribute to variation in second stage larvae and cyst terminal areas. In a study of 161 populations, stylet length and distance from head tip to excretory pore in second stage larvae, and fenestral length and number of ridges between the anal pore and vulva! fenestra in cyst terminal areas were the most stable features in Globodera speciation.It is recommended that 15 observations per population be used in species identification.Comparisons of areas and perimeters of second stage larvae and males of previously identified populations were found to be unreliable for identification as determined by an Image Analizing Computer.In a comparative study of the biology of some selected populations, there appears to be no fundamental differences between British and Peruvian populations of the same species.However, the Peruvian population of G. pallida is less sensitive to temperature extremes than the \"white\" British G. pallida.In general, G. pallida populations showed better adaptation to low temperatures than those of G. rostochiensis. Daylength had an indirect effect through the host on the rate of invasion and development of both species.Studies using protein gel electrophoresis of immature females, scan electron microscopy and controlled matings of British and Peruvian populations of G. rostochiensis showed no differences between them. lnstraspecific matings between populations from various places of origin were successful.In studies of the geographical distribution, the two species coexist around latitude 15 ° S. North of th is latitude in Peru, the populations are exclusively G. pallida; southward along the Andes, and especially around Lake Titicaca, G. rostochiensis predominates, although G. pallida may also be found.It is probable that the pest was introduced into Europe in the late 1840's where it became established and was firstreported in 1881.Although data were collected during 1977 on the influence of latitude, soil type and host varieties on different populations of cyst nematodes many of the results were equivocal.In general both species of Globodera reproduced better at southern latitudes ( 16 -17 ° S) than farther north (7 -12° S). Soil types had a marked influence on reproduction; reproduction of both species on soil from Arequipa, was 10 times as prolific as soils from Tanna and Cajamarca. It was not evident from detailed soil analysis -including electrical conductance, pH, organic matter level, textural class, component fractions, available nutrients, percent N and exchangeable cations -which factor or combination of factors contributed to the wide variation in reproduction in the soils tested. lnterplanting of Tagetes minuta, Lupinus alba and Mentha viridis with potatoes dramatically reduced reproduction of G. rostochiensis but not G. pallida. Conversely, interplanting of Chenopodium quinoa var. Sajama and Cucurbita maxima increased the reproductive rate of G. • pallida yet had no apparent influence on G. rostochiensis.In 1977, 1,937 clones from the CIP germ plasm collection were tested for resistance to the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita acrita. Only 19 clones exhibited some degree of resistance and had a trace of root infection by this pest.The present status of testing cultivated potatoes for resistance to M. incognita acrita is presented in Table 17. Since the degree and frequency of resistance in the cultivated potato is rather low, intercrossing resistant material, as well as outcrossing to selected genotypes, is being considered to fully utilize these genetic resources. Data indicate that tuber and root infections are independent and there is no correlation in resistance of these structures to nematode infection. In another study, the reaction of 62 tuber-bearing Solanum speciesconsisting of 254 accessions and 3,661 genotypes -to M. incognita acrita was evaluated under screenhou!?e conditions (Table 18). Plants with high levels of resistance and immunity will continue to be retested and used in breeding for resistance to root-knot nematode.A new method using 4 oz. plastic cups as well as a suitable soil mixture was developed for seedling screening. Young seedlings approximately 5-10 cm tall were transplanted in the plastic cups containing a sterilized potting soi I mixture of either 1 : 1 sand: Jiffy mix, or 2: 2: 1 sand: Jiffy mix: Pomacocha soil. Two weeks later the plants were inoculated with 4,000 root-knot nematode eggs and were allowed to grow for six to eight weeks prior to evaluation for resistance. This method provides an efficient and rapid screening procedure for a large number of plants as well as pathotypes of both root-knot and cyst nematodes.Plastic cups (4 oz.) used in a rapid, mass screening procedure for resistance to nematodes.Elsewhere in this report (Thrust V} the pathogenic interaction between M. incognita acrita and Pseudomonas has been mentioned.It is of particular interest to note in studying the interaction of these two organisms on Meloidogyne immune, resistant and susceptible plants, that root infection by nematodes as expressed by root galling index was directly correlated, with bacterial symptoms as expressed by percent plants wilted (Table 19).Reaction of Solanuni sparsipilum and S. chacoense (root-knot nematode immune and resistant plants respectively) to P. solanacearum was directly correlated with their reaction to Meloidogyne. In another interaction study, depression of cyst nematode development was observed on plants inoculated simultaneously with Globodera pallida and with a fungus, either Phoma exigua, P. exigua var. nonoxydabilis, P. andinum sp. nov, or Collectotrichum cocr:odes. No cyst infection by the fungi was noted in the cysts examined.Apparently fungi used in this study infected roots in the presence of G. pallida, a factor which may have retarded nematode development.With respect to individual glycoalkaloids, tomatine at concentrations from 0.05 -0.6 percent of a synthetic diet was extremely toxic to E. fabae nymphs. (A diet containing 0.6 percent tomatine is equivalent to TGA levels in fresh S. polyadenium foliage.) Alpha-solanine at the same concentration had no effect on survival.In cooperative research with Rothamsted Experimental Station, England, and Cornell University contract research, E. fabae resistance due to the presence of glandular trichomes was evaluated (Table 21 ).Accessions of S. berthaultii with both simple and four-lobed glandular trichomes had more of a tendency for smaller infestations than those with four-lobed trichomes alone. Thirty accessions of wild, tuber-bearing Solanum species differentially resistant to infestation by M. persicae and E. fabae were reevaluated in replicated trials. Accessions of S. acaule, S. berthaultii, S. chacoense, S. polyadenium and S. polytrichon averaged 90 percent or higher reduction in infestation by the potato leaf hopper compared to Katahdin, Superior and Kennebec. S. berthaultii, S. bulbocastanum and S. polyadenium had similar reductions in green peach aphids, compared to susceptible checks. Clearly, these studies demonstrate a potential for developing insect-resistant breeding lines.The nature of insect resistance was examined from chemical and physical points of view. Foliage of 11 species, differentially-resistant to nymphal infestation of E. fabae in 1976 field trials, were analyzed in 1977 for total glycoalkaloids {TGA). Levels of TGA ranged from a low of 13mg/100g fresh weight in S. bulbocastanum (Pl 275194) to a high of 688 mg/100g gresh weight in S. polyadenium (Pl 161728), for a range of about 50-fold.Nymphal infestation of E. fabae and TGA (percent fresh weight) were highly correlated ( R = -0. 75). With the exception of S. berthaultii, accessions resistant on the basis of nymphal infestation had a level of 0.17 percent TGA or greater, while those of susceptible accessions had a level of 0.05 percent TGA or less, fresh weight.Typical galls on the' roots of potatoes infested with false rootknot nematodes, Nacobbus aberrans.A comprehensive taxonomic study of the false root-knot nematodes (Nacobbus species) attacking potatoes was undertaken in cooperation with Dr. A. M. Golden, USDA nematologist, Beltsville, Maryland. A total of 26 populations collected from Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru were examined morphologically for taxonomic identification.Based on morphometrics of populations examined and on original description of N. aberrans and its three synonyms (as revised by Sher in 1970}, all false root-knot nematodes attacking the potato in South America, up to the present time, are considered to be of the N. aberrans species complex involving two or more forms rather than a single homogeneous species.As part of a study of the biology of N. aberrans, survival of the nematode under desiccation was investigated. Soil samples and infected roots collected from a heavily infested field were air-dried for four weeks. Samples of moist infested soil and infested air-dried soil were processed for nematodes.No vermiform nematodes were found in the air-dried soil. A similar number of egg masses containing viable eggs was found in both moist and air-dried soil (Table 20). The data indicate that N. aberrans can withstand desiccation and that eggs are the primary means of survival under drought conditions. Adults and nymphs of E. fabae confined on foliage of S. polyadenium accumulate trichome exudate on mouth parts and tarsi, leading to early death due to impaired feeding mobility. In field tests, resistance of S. polyadenium was equal to that of S. berthaultii.Adult of the potato leaf hopper (Empoasca fabae) showing an accumulation of trichome exudate on feet and mouth parts.S. polyadenium has two types of insect resistance: glandular trichomes and relatively high levels of toxic glycoalkaloids. The aggressive feeding of the adult Andean weevil, Premnotrypes suturicallus appears to be inhibited by both chemical and physical factors. In a laboratory experiment in which adult weevils were confined on leaf discs of a number of different Solanum species, S. polyadenium proved to be more resistant to feeding injury than the other tested species. When leaf surfaces of S. polyadenium were wiped with tissue paper to remove glandular hairs there was a significant increase in foliage feeding (Table 22). The inheritance of simple, non-lobed, exudate-secreting trichomes is being studies.In hybrids derived from crosses between the diploids S. phureja and S. berthaultii, a ratio of four non-glandular, nine rudimentary glandular and three sticky glandular hairs were distii:tguished in the F 2 generation. In an F 2 population, 19 of 282 hybrids seedlings from a tetraploid (S. tuberosum var. Pentland Crown) x diploid (S. berthaultii) cross had sticky, simple trichomes. Both ratios were similar to those expected if the development of this type of hair is controlled by two genes, one dominant and one recessive. This hypothesis will be tested by further crossings.Almost all the seedlings without sticky tips could be eliminated by visual examination before transplanting.All plants selected among the S. tuberosum hybrids proved capable of trapping a proportion of the mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus. When adults of a larger mite, Tetranychus urticae, were pla~ed on tetraploid hybrid leaflets all were captured by the exudate on the simple hairs.A high density of glandular trichomes appears to be important in trapping very small mites.Studies were resumed to confirm the identification of virus-like particles transmitted through the action of the ovipositor by the female leaf miner fly, Liriomyza huidobrensis. These rod-shaped particles have been transmitted to \"Samsun\" tobacco plants with a high frequency by leaf miner flies collected from several hosts in the field (Table 23). Although the particles have been purified from infected \"Samsun\" tobacco plants using a technique for PVY isolation, tobacco plants checked serologically against PVX, PVY, PVS, andean potato latent virus and andean potato mottle virus gave negative results. The leaf miner fly causes feeding injury and also larval tunneling injury in potato foliage. The feeding injury is due to punctures made by the female ovipositor, the leaf sap which exudes from the puncture being consumed by flies of both sexes.a Tunneling injury (a) and feeding injury (b) caused by leaf miner fly, Liriomyza huidobrensis, on potato leaves.Resistance to leaf miner fly injury was evaluated during 1977 in 10 commercial varieties at El Asesor and in the coastal Canete Valley, Peru. Percentage of foliage damage was rated in 30-plant plots laid out in a randomized complete block design.The variety \"Tomasa Condemayta\" had significantly less larval tunneling injury (15 percent) than \"Mariva\" (21.8 percent) and \"Ticahuasi\" (22 percent), which in turn were more resistant than the remaining seven varieties tested.Feeding injury associated with ovipositor punctures in foliage was evaluated in discs 12 mm in diameter. Evaluation of data by Duncan's Multiple Range Test showed that the variety \"Merpata\" had significantly less feeding injury than \"Tomasa Condemayta\", or \"Mariva\". A direct correlation between ovipositor injury associated with feeding and reproductive activity has been established only in the case of the variety \"Renacimiento\".Comparison of leaf miner larvae (Liriomyza huidobrensis) tunneling injury in susceptible and resistant potato varieties.The potato tuber worm, Phthorimaea operculella, is a serious pest in many parts of the tropical and subtropical world. Eggs are laid singly, usually on the underside of leaves. The emerging larvae penetrate and mine leaves, often tunneling into leaf veins and continuing down inside the stem to the developing tubers. Infestation in potato storages is initiated by storing infected tubers or by entrance of moths into the storage.During 1977, field studies were undertaken in cooperation with the Laboratory for Research on Insecticides, Wageningen, the Netherlands, to evaluate the effectiveness of a synthetic pheromone in attracting and trapping male tuber moths. (Sex pheromones, produced by the mating female tuber moths, attract male tuber moths.) The effectiveness of the synthetic pheromone is apparent in that 22,225 male moths were trapped during 31 days, an average of 717 moths per night in a single water trap.During the same period, 11 males were trapped in a water control trap.In a second trap 23,537 males, 759 per night, were trapped compared to a total of seven males in a control trap. A maximum of 3,895 moths were trapped in a single night (Fig. 6). ------------------------.... In addition to the simplicity of the traps employed, the synthetic pheromone mainta'ined its activity under field conditions for more than one year. Impregnation of the pheromone into several types of rubber appeared to be equally effective in attracting male moths. The identification of aphids under field conditions is usually very difficult for techni9ians.During the year an illustrated brochure was prepared to assist in the identification of six important potato aphids.In addition to descriptive information on feeding habits and gross visible characters, descriptive photographs of diagnostic features visible under a hand lens were included. The potential of the potato as a source of food for developing countries of the equatorial belt, between 30° N and 30° S, lies in selecting genotypes adapted to diverse environments. Not the least of the barriers to acceptance of this potential has been the widely held concept that the potato is a temperate zone crop. This view ignores the photoperiodic elasticity of the potato which thrives in a nine-hour daylength range, between a long Scandinavian summer day and a short tropical winter day.Its latitudinal growth range of over 100° exceeds that of most other crops. The capacity of the potato to grow in a 4,300 m altitude range is challenged by few cultivated plants.Its adaptability to grow in a 43° C temperature range is an indication of its genetic diversity. Its growing season can be from two to five or six months, reflecting the flexible response of potato clones to ranges in temperature, daylength and water and nutrient availability.In the development of heat-tolerant potatoes, clones and seedling populations have been evaluated for yield directly in the field under conditions of high temperature stress. A temperature of 21 ° C, at a soil depth of 15 cm, has been selected as an arbitrary minimum for testing heat tolerance.The climate at Yurimaguas, located in the Amazon basin at 180 m, is highly favorable for large-scale field tests of heat tolerance.From the data presented in Table 24 is apparent the general uniformity of temperature throughout the year. The mean monthly maximum has a range of 34.5 ± 1° C; the mean monthly minimum a range of 19 ± 2° C while the mean daily temperature fluctuates less than 1.5° C throughout the year. Other data collected at San Ramon, located in a high jungle area at 800 m, shows the relation of air temperature to soil temperature (Table 25). Because little is known about the physiology of heat tolerance, studies have been initiated to explore the endogenous factors responsible for resistance to heat stress.In preliminary studies of the role of plant hormones and growth regulators, it was observed that there was a 10-fold increase in the production of gibberellins (GA) in shoots on increasing temperature from 20 to 30° C under a 12-hour d;:iylight regime.The GA level increased 5-fold when temperature was held constant at 20° C, but the daylength was increased from 12 to 18 hours.Abscisic acid (ABA) levels remained constant at both 20 and 30° C and at 12 and 18-hour photoperiods (Fig. 7). The interaction of N supply and the GA and ABA content of shoots (S. tuberosum) has been examined. With the interruption of N supply, the level of GA in shoots decreased and the level of ABA increased.Restoring the N supply reversed the GA/ ABA ratio. It was also noted that when high rates of N were supplied after tuberization, tuber growth was inhibited and stolons formed at the apex of tubers. Interruptions of N supplies initiated tuberization again (secondary growth).The capacity of leaves of four clones to tolerate high temperature (38° C day ; 32° C night) was studied as part of thesis research supported by a contract at Cornell University. Clone 1-4 of S. acaule and clone 10-10 of S. chacoense were very sensitive to high temperature. Clones 10-3 of S. chacoense appeared intermediate in sensitivity and clone 11 -5 of S. chacoense was tolerant. Neither the rate of photosynthesis (monitored by infra-red C0 2 analyzer in controlled temperature leaf chambers), transpiration, nor cell membrane permeability under heat stress were correlated with heat sensitivity. However, there appeared to be a correlation between respiration rate and sensibility to heat (Fig. 8). In breeding for heat tolerance at Cornell, crosses of heat-tolerant clones produced 764 seedlings out of 1,960 which tuberized under conditions of heat stress: 32° C day; 24° C night.From the seedling families that tuberized, heat-tolerant clones (those that produced the largest tubers) and non-heat tolerant clones (those that produced the smallest tubers) were identified. Because of the bias introduced by comparing progeny from different size tubers, plants derived from cuttings were evaluated under heat stress conditions.The heat tolerance index of heat-tolerant clones was one-third higher than non-heat tolerant clones. There were no differences in growth rate among the clones.In a separate experiment, heat-tolerant clones did not differ in photoperiod response from non-heat tolerant clones in their capacity to tuberize.This suggests the independence of heat tolerance from photoperiod response (Fig. 9). Preliminary studies have also shown a differential increase in free proline in leaves subjected to a continuous temperature of 37 ° C. Coupled with favorable progress in breeding clones resistant to -4° C; is the increasing understanding of the anatomical and physiological basis of frost resistance.In research at the University of Minnesota, supported in part by contractual arrangements with CIP, ultrastructural differences in leaf cells of potatoes were examined in relation to their frost resistance.A four-fold increase in osmiophilic globuli in chloroplasts, from 1, 130 to 4,217 per 100 chloroplasts, occurred following cold acclimation of the frost resistant species, S. acaule, to -9° C. In contrast, in \"Red Pontiac\", a frost-susceptible S. tuberosum variety which cannot be acclimated, the globuli increased from 563 to 872 per 100 chloroplasts.Apparently lipid accumulation is associated with exposure to freezing temperatures.The disappearance of starch grains in the chloroplasts of S. acaule, while those of S. tuberosum \"Red Pontiac\" remained intact, suggests a possible protective effect of soluble sugars against freezing injury in these sensitive organelles.In obervations of leaf anatomy, nine hardy species (killing temperature -4° C and below) had two layers of palisade leaf parenchyma, while 19 non-hardy species (killing temperature -2.5 to -3.5° C) had only one layer. The leaves of hardy plants were generally thicker with the palisade layers occupying more than 65 percent of the total leaf thickness. The leaf palisade of non-hardy species comprised less than 50 percent of the total leaf cross-section.The walls of leaf mesophyll cells of S. acaule were significantly thicker than comparable walls of the S. tuberosum cultivar (Table 26). The number of stomata, relative to the total number of cells, was three times greater in the hardy than in the non-hardy species. In another study at the University of Minnesota, the frost-killing temperatures of 60 tuber-bearing species were determined in material not previously acclimated. Selections of S. acaule were resistant to -6.5° C.The average killing temperature of the 60 species was -3.5 ° C, range -2.5 to -6.5 ° C.Potatoes are grown commercially under 19-hour days as well as 10-hour days.While some clones are known to tuberize under a range of photoperiods, daylength is generally a critical factor in the control of tuberization.Because of the excellent controlled environment facilities in the North Carolina State University (NCSU) Phytotron, studies of the inheritance of tuber initiation as influenced by photoperiod was carried out under contract research in the Southeastern Plant Environment Laboratories at NCSU. Three day-neutral tuberosum, and one day-neutral and four short-day andigena clones, were used as parents. Eight genetic sets of parental, filial, and back-cross generations were developed. Tuber initiation was evaluated in growth chambers with daylengths of 11, 13 and 15 hours, a range of photoperiods normally experienced in countries of the equatorial belt.F 1 generation means from short-day X day-neutral crosses showed complete dominance of the short-day (late tuber initiation) over the day-neutral reaction (early tuber initiation). F 1 generation means from day-neutral X day-neutral and short-day X short-day crosses showed either no dominance or a tendency toward the short-day parent. A variable degree of parental heterozygosity for the loci controlling tuber initiation is indicated with the short-day clones showing the greatest genetic variability. Tuber initiation appears to be under the control of both major and minor genes. General combining ability values of 90 percent at 11 hours and 55 percent at 15 hours of daylength were estimated.Increases in daylength had the effect of delaying tuber initiation.In contract research at Cornell University, a cutting technique has been developed to permit rapid screening to evaluate \"tuberization stimulus\" under unfavorable photoperiods. Using this technique, clones capable of tuberizing under continuous light have been identified.To test whether there is a partial maternal inheritance of the photoperiod response, a clone capable of tuberizing under continuous light and a clone that required short days (usually 12 hours or less) were each selfed and also crossed in both directions. Thirty-two seedlings from each of the resulting four populations were grown under continuous light. Cuttings were taken and examined for ability to tuberize and the parent plants then were placed under 22 hours of light. Another crop of cuttings was taken and the photoperiod was shortened to 20 hours. The process was repeated until plants had been exposed to 18, 16, 14 and 12 hour days (Table 27). Yields of plants exposed to 20, 14 and 8 hour photoperiods also were measured (Table 28). As expected the population derived from selfing the clone with a long critical photoperiod, had the greatest capacity to tuberize under long photoperiods. The population derived from selfing the short-day clone tuberized most efficiently under short photoperiods while populations from crosses were intermediate.The reciprocal crosses showed a clear maternal influence. When the clone with the long critical photoperiod was the maternal parent, tuberization and yield were significantly greater under continuous light than in the population from the reciprocal cross. Repeating the experiment with 144 seedlings from each pedigree, under greenhouse conditions, confirmed the results of the growth chamber experiments.Attention has been focused on field methods of measuring drought stress through studies affiliated with the Research Station for Arable Farming in •Wageningen, the Netherlands. Extensive trials have been conducted at CIP on the arid coastal desert of Peru where average annual precipitation is 10 mm.Each of several methods for measuring water stress had deficiencies, necessitating an integration of data for a meaningful assessment of drought resistance in the field. Pressure chamber data taken in early morning or late afternoon, together with data on the• infiltration of leaves with oils of varying viscosity taken during early afternoon, permitted the following interpretations: a) small increases in pressure chamber values at increasing soU suction (indicating an efficient root system), toget~er with open stomata (determined by infiltration), are indicators of drought tolerance; b) a large increase in water potential and open stomata are suggestive of low water conservation and early senescence; while, c) a small decrease in water potential and closed stomates for a prolonged period during a day might be favorable for the maturation of a late variety under irregular water supply.Studies were continued at La Molina (coastal desert), San Ramon (high jungle) and Yurimaguas (low jungle) in the use of mulch to modify soil temperatures. An example of the ameliorating influence of mulch on soil temperature is shown in Fig. 10. 29). * Bean = Vicia faba; Pea = Pisum sativa; Quinoa = Chenopodium quinoa.A number of field fertilizer trials were undertaken in 1977 at sites in Peru, representing divergent ecological zones. In these trials it was usual to include a control in which no fertilizer was applied.An example of a trial involving various levels of nitrogen, while phosphorus and potash were constant, is presented in Table 30. In a trial involving varying levels of a recommended fertilizer {160:200:200) application, the differential efficiency of cultivars in utilizing fertilizer is apparent (Table 31 ). It was also evident that adaptation to the experimental sites influenced yield (Tables 30 and 31 ). In a related study, the effect of different management practices upon soil erosion and run-off under different cropping regimes was measured. Two sites were involved, one with 25 percent slope, rainfall 480 mm, on an inceptisol soil over a micaceous schist; the other with a 30 percent slope, rainfall 2, 154 mm, on an entisol developed over colluvial-alluvial material.The importance of management practices was clearly demonstrated at the San Ramon site with the higher (2, 154 mm) annual rainfall (Table 32). Prototype storage with plastic exterior. walls for storing seed potatoes under diffuse light.Collection point for potatoes.Farmers bring in their potatoes and sort them for buyer's inspection.Filling an improved type of potato µit. The wooden chimney has openings in the corners and is placed in the center of the (round) pit. Pit capacity is 1 ton.Building improved type potato storages for small scale farmers. Capacity is 2 tons.A practical study aimed at evaluating the technical and economic feasibility of ware potato storage on small farms in Kenya was started in 1977. Traditionally, three storage systems have been used in Kenya: 1) earth pits for seed potatoes; 2) piles in farm buildings; and, 3) bags (traders storage). No reliable data, on storage losses incurred in these systems has been previously available.As a result, a wooden store was designed and tested in cooperation with the Ministry of Agriculture and the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Nairobi (Table 33). Observations in Kenya during the first season showed that earthen pits were unsatisfactory for ware storage. Bag storage was less suitable than storage in piles. Bag and pit storage studies were, therefore, discontinued.For periods up to two months, pile stores were more economical than wooden stores. For storage periods longer than two months returns to investment were about the same for the low-cost wooden store as for a medium size (150-ton capacity) commercial potato store. The higher storage losses at Ngechi (2, 100 m) than at Meru (2,300 m} and Molo (2,600 m) were attributed to consistently higher night temperatures at Ngechi during the period February to June, 1977.A study was continued throughout the year on small-scale processing of potatoes. In addition to designing and evaluating various dehydration methods, field studies of potato processing technology on small farms in the Mantaro Valley region of Peru were carried out by CIP's Social Science Unit. The contributions of this group are presented elsewhere in this Annual Report.A number of conditions must be met to obtain satisfactory solar dehydration of potato products: 1) The water in the product must trap sufficient calories to vaporize it.Calories trapped by a black surface or air will not evaporate water from the product unless such calories are reradiated to the product water. 2) The rate of diffusion of water from the center to the surface, and from the surface of the product, is determined by the steepness of the diffusion gradients. This is a function of the temperature and relative humidity of the air in contact with the product, as well as the shape and physiological nature of the product. 3) Excessive heat must be avoided during drying to prevent discoloration of the product.Various configurations of \"black box\" solar dryers have been tested. A one-meter square wooden or adobe box with sides 10-20 cm high, covered with flexible 8-mil plastic, with provision for ventilation to allow moisture escape, was a satisfactory low-cost dehydration module. Square, \"V\" and hemispheric notched floor surfaces to enhance trapping solar radiation did not justify the extra construction effort.An unpolished aluminum surface was 10° C hotter, and a reflective aluminum surface was 10° C cooler than the black-painted floor surface of a dehydration module. Air temperatures of 75-95° C and surface temperatures of 95-105 ° C are indices of attainable temperatures in a \"black box\" module.Adequate drying, without discoloration, was obtained with 1 mm-thick shreds exposed for one day at a temperature of 55° C (altitude, 3,300 m). Air movement to permit moisture escape and to maintain a temperature below 70° C was provided by raising the plastic top of the dryer 2-5 cm or by small ventilation holes in the bottom and sides of the box. At temperatures above 70° C, particularly nearing the completion of drying, brown discoloration and unpleasant flavors developed. Satisfactory drying of products other than potatoes, such as onions, yucca and sweet potatoes, offers a wide scope for black box technology in Andean food processing.A wide range of routine analyses was carried out during the year in support of a variety of research projects. Included were analyses of catalase activity; total and reducing sugars; vitamines B 1 ; riboflavin, niacin and C; total protein; relative nutritive values; available methionine; minerals -iron, copper, magnesium, manganese, potassium, zinc and iodine; glycoalkaloids; and, dry matter. As an example of routine analyses, the dry matter, total protein and reducing sugar levels determined for 12 commercial Peruvian varieties were: dry matter, mean 22:96 percent, range 1.27 -27.98 percent; total protein, mean 7. 70 percent, range 6.13 -11.69 percent; and, reducing sugars, mean 0.36 mg/percent, range 0.15 -0.89 mg/percent. Similar analyses of 249 samples involving seven species are presented in Table 34.The range in percent total protein, on a dry matter basis, was 4.5 -14.5 percent, average 7.87 percent. Relative nutritive values were lower for raw potatoes than for cooked potatoes. In a study of six varieties in storage at 5° C for up to three months, there was a gradual increase in relative nutritive value up to 45 days followed by a decline. The CIP potato cell and tissue culture program has the following objectives: a) to maintain potato germ plasm in clonal form for prolonged periods free of pathogens; b) to facilitate the international transfer of valuable potato clones; c) to rapidly multiply clonal material in a disease free condition; and, d) to adapt and develop new areas of research and application.The multi-meristem culture technique has been successfully employed for the rapid, in vitro multiplication (up to 100-fold) of the species andigena (4x), chaucha (3x), juzepchukii (3x) and curtilobum (5x).Shoot proliferation was hastened with gibberellic acid on \"organogenic calluses\" induced by cytokinin and auxin. To induce profuse shoot development in tuberosum (4x) varieties, initial shoot-tip explants were first allowed to elongate their leaves and axes slightly with the addition of a low level of gibberellic acid and a relatively high level of auxin. Thereafter, a highly branched culture with very little or no callus was produced under the influence of low cytokinin and high gibberellic acid. At present 40 of 50 different pathogen-tested clones have been processed through the multi-meristem system. During 1977, 132 aseptic multi-meristem cultures representing 71 clones were sent to 10 countries.A minimum growth storage technique has been developed for intermediate term storage requiring one transfer per year. Nodal cuttings from plantlets derived from multi-meristem cultures are maintained at 4-5° C, under low light, on media with low levels of growth inhibitors and relatively high sugar content.A reversal of these conditions enhances in vitro growth. Of interest is the differential behavior of andigena and tuberosum clones, adg clones being more subject to injury from relatively high temperatures and high levels of growth inhibitors than tbr clones. A temperature of 6° C, without growth inhibitors, was repressive to the growth of tbr clones, but not to adg clones. Recently 44 different pathogen-free clones, three or four test-tube cultures of each, have been placed in minimum growth storage conditions for observation during 1978.There is an element of concern with regard to the karyological instability of in vitro cultures due to euploidy, aneuploidy, chromosomal translocations, and possibly, mutations. Experiments are continuing to evaluate the stability of varietal characteristics of two clones. Virusinfected plants were processed through single and multi-meristem culture systems. The single culture approach gives rise to a single plant directly, while many plantlets (multi-meristem) develop on an \"organogenic callus\" derived from a single shoot-tip. Virus-free plants and plants still containing viruses (PVX, PVX + PVY) were regenerated, potted and allowed to tuberize. These tubers, together with tubers of the original infected \"mother\" plants and tubers of plants naturally free, were potted again to produce second generation tubers. These were used to compare electrophoretic patterns of total soluble tuber proteins and esterases.No changes were observed in protein and esterase electrophoretic patterns, due to either the tissue culture system or the presence or absence of viruses. Taxonomic-cytological studies, as well as evaluation of cultures being stored for intermediate periods are under continuing study.The possibilities of shipping small, aseptic tubers grown in vitro to developing countries, and the use of in vitro tuberization to study certain basic high-temperature stress problems, have encouraged studies of tuberization in culture. To present, nodes excised from plantlets arising in multi-meristem cultures have been the most convenient source of explant material for the production of a large number of tubers in a continuous fashion. Most clones have required a medium rich in sugar and supplemented with high concentration of chlorocholinchloride (CCC).The use of stem cutting and related techniques to rapidly multiply potatoes under disease-free conditions was established as a routine procedure in 1976. The use of a liquid mixture of IBA and NAA in 30 percent ethanol has effectively increased rooting of cuttings while inhibiting tuberization.The rate of propagation from tubers was increased three to four-fold by making stem and stolon cuttings from the tubers of certain slow growing clones.An adaptation of a published \"leaf-node cutting\" technique is being developed.This system involves the induction of tubers on stem segments containing an axillary bud and its subtending leaf excised from the stems of senescent plants. Thus a plant with 10 to 15 nodes on each of five stems will provide 50-75 leaf-node cuttings. When planted in coarse sand under short day conditions and relatively low temperature these cuttings would, potentially, produce 50-75 tubers.In another technique being evaluated, secondary sprouts were generated on tubers several weeks after removal of 3 to 5 cm primary sprouts and immersion of the tubers in 2.0 ppm gibberellic acid. Excised sprouts were allowed to root on wet filter paper before being planted in pots or trays.The CIP program for virus eradication in potatoes consists of a number of stages referred to as \"Generations\".Generation \"O\" has been divided into steps: Step 1, virus detection tests; Step 2, meristem culture following thermotherapy and regeneration of plants from culture; and, Step 3, confirmation of the virus-free status of regenerated plants in insect-proof greenhouses.If non-infected material is identified in Step 1, the plant is moved to Step 3, bypassing Step 2.The effectiveness of eradication depends upon the system employed (Table 35).The application of high temperature to in vitro nodal cuttings derived from multi-meristem has been effective in the eradication of PVX and PVS.More recently the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method is being evaluated as a means of detecting viruses in in vitro cultures. Commonly, the development of an isolated meristem tip into a plantlet takes up to three months. By weekly transfers to fresh semi-solid medium with a high level of GA, plantlets four to five cm in height can be produced in three to four weeks. This technique not only accelerates the growth several-fold but also tends to favor virus eradication.During 1977 approximately 50 clones have been processed through meristem culture, usually following thermotherapy. Of these, 43 have Qeen grown in pots and moved to the greenhouse for virus retest. Thirty-three clones have entered Step 3 after meristem culture and plant regeneration, 24 of which were free of viruses and have entered . Generation I.In addition, 27 clones entered Generation I directly being found free in Step 1 and confirmed in Step 3, Generation \"O\".Five Generations are involved in the maintenance and progressive multiplication of pathogen-free seed.Generation i involves the maintenance of nuclear stock derived from Generation 0. In Generation I! pathogen-tested clones are produced for export to national programs for local increase or testing.Generations 111, IV and V are for the progressive increase of low-virus seed for routine CIP field research.Generation I : At present 88 clones are being maintained, 44 as in vitro multi-meristem cultures and 44 as both multi-meristem cultures and plants.Clones for which there is limited use are held only as multimeristem cultures.Generation 11 : Thirty-six varieties were multiplied for export. Also included were 201 tuber families, produced from true seed, which were sent to 10 developing countries for evaluation for tropical adaptation, resistance to late blight and for frost resistance. From pathogen-tested clones of this Generation, 4,430 stem cuttings were produced for the Peruvian National Potato Program and 4,500 for CIP scientists.Generations 111, IV and V: During the 1976-77 crop year, about 16.5 metric tons of seed were distributed to CIP scientists, while 2.5 tons were replanted to produce the 1977-78 crop. In addition, over 5,000 stem cuttings were produced from Generation 111 plants for CIP use. A summary of material exported during the year is presented in Table 36. In Honduras and Costa Rica long-term seed production programs have been initiated. With four tons of Super Elite seed from the Netherlands, Honduras has produced 25 tons of low virus seed. This, first year of production has served as training for local scientists and farmers.In Costa Rica, selected clon,es and varieties are being multiplied from stem cuttings. New land facilities are being organized to develop a full-scale seed project in 1978.A plan to receive and multiply meristems of Rosita and Atzimba varieties has been initiated jointly among CIP, the University of Costa Rica and the Ministry of Agriculture.The University has the facilities to carry out the initial propagation of meristem material which is then transferred to the greenhouse to produce tubers and mother plants. This material will become the basic stock for the national seed project.A problem in rooting cuttings was encountered .at Turrialba. This was traced to a nutrient deficiency in the medium.A new medium of coarse sand and bagasse, and irrigation with Hoagland's solution has produced excellent results.Upon transplanting rooted cuttings directly to the field at Turrialba, 90 percent died. However, a system has now been developed which uses paper cups for growing the cuttings and these are transplanted directly to the field. The problem has been resolved.Seed schemes are being developed in Kenya and Zambia, with some initial contacts in Malawi, Southern Sudan and Lesotho.In Kenya, the scheme proposed will involve CIP, the Kenya Seed Inspection Service, Kenya Seed Company (a commercial organization) and the Potato Research Section of the Ministry of Agriculture. The basic materials will be provided by the Research Section.In Zambia, a seed production scheme has already been started and CIP's input will be limited to supplying materials as required, periodic advisory visits and training of personnel.The stem cutting technology has been introduced to accelerate the production of first year basic seed. After solving initial problems, the production of stem cuttings from mother plants has been established. Some virus-tested clones imported from CIP as multi-meristem have been grown in Turkey.A simplified production scheme for low virus-content seed has been started in Tunisia. This aims to provide seed for the autumn crop sown in August when imported seed of the right physiological age is not available. Seventy-five tons were produced in 1977 which have already been distributed to farmers and planted. The vigor and number of stems •per unit area of this seed is far superior to farmers' seed. Depending on the time at which haulms were destroyed, the virus content has varied from four to 14 percent.A cooperative project to develop seed production in the autumn season in the plains has been started with the Punjab Government. This will support the overall national program, particularly with facilities to develop a basic seed area in the Kaghan Valley. This project is being aided by a bilateral contract.India already has the most advanced seed program in tropical countries and new techniques are not envisaged in the near future. The program however will serve as an excellent training ground for other developing country personnel.The main objective of CIP's involvement is to assist the development of a strong seed program to amplify the existing traditional systems of seed production.It will provide a means for disseminating varieties and clones already identified as having improved yield and disease resistances.Preliminary trials for introducing rapid multiplication by the stem cutting technique showed that during the dry season rooting was difficult, but by providing sufficient shade and humidity rooting was accomplished. Up to 150 cuttings could be taken from some mother plants.In transportation to the high altitude station, a high percentage of rooted cuttings survived the journey.Trials were made of a sprout cutting method. The advantages of this method are that all cuttings are available simultaneously, no mother plants have to. be raised and greenhouse space is not required. The results were encouraging, providing that temperature and humidity were adjusted as in the case of the stem cutting method.From the pathogen-tested seed produced by CIP-Lima, 17 new clones have been introduced. It had been hoped that S. andigena x tuberosum crosses would do well in Nepal. This has been realized and Mariva, a Peruvian variety, not only produced an outstanding yield, but its tuber characteristics almost exactly matched the preferred local \"round red\" variety. With its additional late blight and virus resistance it might well replace the local variety, provided that it produces equally well on the plains.Trial shipments of meristem tissue cultures of heat-tolerant material was sent to Indonesia and the Philippines.The cultures shipped to Indonesia were etiolated at the end of the three week delivery time. Rooted stem cuttings from CIP were carried successfully by courier to the Philippines. The material was of potential heat-tolerant clones. The Philippines and Korea are both exploring CIP techniques in the use of stem cuttings as a rapid multiplication tool.A Sydney University technique of sprout proliferation in vitro is being pursued in the Philippines and Korea.Sprouts 1.50 cm long are excised from a parent pathogen-free tuber. They then are grown in controlled conditions in intermittently shaken flasks.The plantlets produced are divided repeatecjly into budded cuttings.The final generation is rooted in .sand and transplanted to a screenhouse or to the field, where good quantities of seed tubers are produced from each plant.A cooperative trial with the Department of Scientific Research, New Zealand, is being conducted in the Philippines using true (botanical) seed from both selfed and controlled pollinations. Several lines have shown a high percentage of germination plus an acceptably high proportion of high yielding plants. One line in New Zealand approached commercial quantities obtained from the normal method of planting seed tubers.CIP TRAINING SCHOLARSHIPS APRIL .f978 The major activity included a three-month course on potato production (with emphasis on seed production) conducted in Peru. There were seven participants representing Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela. Region IV: Middle East and North Africa Two one-month inter-regional potato production courses were held in Tunisia (April 3-30) in French, and in Turkey (September 4-30) in English. Sixteen participants from Turkey, Tunisia, Syria, Morocco, Algeria, Rwanda and Burundi attended the Tunisian course. In Turkey, eight participants from Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Tunisia and Iran attended; GTZ, Germany, sponsored one scientist who wi'll work on a bilateral seed project in Pakistan which CIP will support technically.Several short courses involving eight trainees in potato production, seed multiplication and field roguing were given by national programs in Turkey, Tunisia and Syria assisted by CIP staff. In-depth production training was conducted for nine Turkish and Tunisian scientists. Three Turkish scientists went to the U. K. for graduate training, while a Sudanese scientist enrolled in Ph.D. studies at the University of Wisconsin.Th.e Region VI Regional Scientist spent an orientation period in Izmir prior to his assignment to India.An inter-regional workshop/seminar on potato improvement and marketing constraints was held at Izmir on October 4-14, 1977, for 23 potato specialists from seven countries in the Region.In addition to publication in English and French of production course manuals, various training materials and slides were made available to national programs. Assistance was given in the development of potato research programs in seven countries, as well as assistance in the development of research project proposals for funding.The Southwest Asian program was recently initiated and involves Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran. Ir. H. Sparenberg of IBVL, Wageningen, visited Pakistan for 16 days to advise on the storage of seed and table stock under local environmental conditions. Visits were made to the Swat and Kaghan valleys in the Northwest Frontier Province and to Baluchistan.The Regional Representative was a participant at the Second FAQ/SIDA seminar, on \"Field Food Crops in the Near East and North Africa\", held at Lahore in September. The coordinator of the Pakistan National Potato Program attended the inter-regional workshop/seminar held in Izmir, Turkey, during October.Two short visits were made to Kabul, Afghanistan, in July and August for preliminary discussions with government officials.The Regional Representative visited Tehran, Iran, July 7-12, in connection with the inter-regional course and workshop/seminar in Izmir, Turkey. A potato specialist from the extension service and one from the Horticultural Station, Shahroud, attended the September potato production course in Izmir, Turkey. Two scientists from Korea spent three months at Lima specializing in breeding and post-harvest technology. A pathologist from Sri Lanka studied various techniques appropriate to research on bacterial wilt of potato. She has since gone to work with our contract in Wisconsin University, USA and will eventually embark on a M. S. study.Continuing our link with Australian institutions, a physiologist spent several weeks in Sydney University, Australia specializing in tissue culture.The physiologist will be in charge of rapid multiplication of potato germ plasm in the Philippines.The first and second seed production courses at the Plant Research Institute, Burley, Victoria, Australia, were attended by scientists from the Philippines, Korea, Sri Lanka and Indonesia. A scientist from Sri Lanka attended the IAC Potato Production Course at Wageningen, the Netherlands.Approximately 40 persons participated in a five-day production school held in Korea and supported by CIP scientists.During 1977 the Social Science Unit (SSU) narrowed its research scope to three areas: (1) post-harvest technology and utilization; (2) potato seed production and distribution systems; and, (3) farm-level constraints to potato production.Previously initiated work on socioeconomic documentation (bibliographic research and analysis and publication of national level statistics) and contract research for the comparative study of potato production and utilization (Ecuador, Chile and Kenya) was reduced in scope. In the immediate future, the SSU will concentrate most of its resources on research in the central highlands of Peru, and on the development of training materials and methods for use in CIP courses. This implies a temporarily reduced role for the social science staff in the Center's regional programs.In August 1977 the first Social Science Planning Conference was held at CIP.In preparation for this event, a position paper was prepared which summarizes work to date and outlines a work plan for the immediate future.The main elements of this plan are in-depth research on farm-level production constraints, post-harvest technology and utilization, and potato seed production and distribution systems. The planning conference participants endorsed the plan of work outlined in the position paper and stressed the importance of in-depth field research. The panel felt th~t national-level studies should not be emphasized, and recommended that, for at least two years, the SSU focus its resources on micro-level research in the Peruvian highlands. . The national-level study of potato production and utilization in Ecuador was completed in 1977. The Kenya and Chile studies are scheduled for completion by mid-1978.All three reports will be published by the Center in 1978.No other country studies will be carried out until at least 1979. The investigation of post-harvest technology is an integral part of CIP's Thrust V 111 whose aim is to develop low-cost storage and processing technology which can be used by small farmers at the village level. While the distribution (marketing) and consumption patterns are critical aspects of post-harvest technology, investigation has so far concentrated on indigenous storage and processing techniques in the Mantaro Valley region. This is where the Huancayo experiment station is located and where CIP's technical work on storage and processing methods has been concentrated to date.In late 1976 a study was undertaken to describe why and how potatoes are stored in the Mantaro Valley region.The study utilized two methods of investigation, including the key informant interview of individuals having a broad knowledge of potato production and distribution in the region. More than 70 farmers and officials wpre interviewed and numerous farm visits made to examine different types of storage techniques.During the last two weeks of study, structured interviews were held with 20 farmers to gather preliminary quantitative information. on storage practices.The farmers were interviewed without a formal questionnaire because they were questioned while working in the field. The farmers' responses were recorded after the conversation had been terminated.Information gathered from this initial sample will be compared later with results gathered in a larger sample of farmers (124) as part of a study of processing techniques. The information will also be compared to the results of a comprehensive production survey of the entire Mantaro Valley region.The most important alternatives for a farmer at harvest were found to be: (1) immediate sale or exchange; or, (2) storage for on-farm consumption, seed, animal feed or processing. All farmers who grow potatoes in the Mantaro Valley region store some part of their production, but the amount varies with the type of producer. For example, farmers with small holdings (less than two hectares in potatoes) store a larger percentage. of their production than do growers with larger holdings (see Table 38). Farmers.with small holdings store production principally for on-farm consumption and for seed, but also keep potatoes for animal feed and processing. Growers with larger holdings, on the other hand, primarily store potatoes for seed and only a minor amount for home consumption.Processing and animal feed are unimportant forms of post-harvest utilization for large growers.Besides examining the functions of storage in the overall pattern of post-harvest utilization, the study also looked at the physical types of storages.Three main types were found to exist: house storages, outbuildings, and field storages. The most common place for potato storage was found to be the farmer's house (for security, and convenience). Storage space in the house is multi-purpose; when the potatoes are not being stored, something else is kept in their place.Within the house, distinctions are often made between appropriate places for seed and ware (consumer) potatoes. These distinctions are based upon the perceived characteristics of the crop. Seed potatoes need to keep their shape and handling should be minimized; therefore, these potatoes are kept on the ground floor. The potatoes are separated from direct contact with the earth by a layer of straw or other material which provides for air circulation under the pile. Eucalyptus leaves and grasses such as mufia and retama, whose odors are believed to repel insects, are used extensively. Ware potatoes, on the other hand, need a dark place where sunlight entering through doors and windows does not turn the potatoes green, 'and therefore, the attic is a preferred location. Householders were found to prefer potatoes which had sweetened while being allowed to \"spoil\" and this preference also favored the use of the attic for ware potatoes. Outbuildings are constructed by large-scale grower's who tend to build special storage buildings, not only for potatoes, but also for tools, fertilizers, and other crops. Like house storages, outbuildings are multi-purpose, a characteristic examplified by the use of converted stables for storage.Specialized buildings for potato storage were rarely encountered. The University of Huancayo operates a potato storage facility built in the 1960's which uses wooden bins, but the design has not been copied by farmers.Field storages, built with straw and earth either above or under the ground, are used on a limited scale almost exclusively for seed potatoes. The storages are made feasible by the fact that the normal storage period for seed -April to October -is a time in which little or no rain falls.The main disadvantages noted by farmers are the high labor input required for an initial selection of the tubers and the care needed to guard field storages against widespread theft of crops.During 1977, a six-month study of potato processing was conducted in the highland province of Concepcion in the Mantaro Valley region. Fieldwork was carried out by a Dutch student of rural sociology and several Peruvian students. The group spent an initial period gathering descriptions of all food processing technology in the area, as well as information on other post-harvest practices such as sale, storage and animal feed.During the second phase of the study, a survey using a formal questionnaire was carried out with 120 farmers in the province.For purposes of the study, the province was divided into three major production zones on the basis of altitude and crop complex. The lowest zone, from 3,200 -3,400 m, is dominated by potato and corn which is often irrigation grown. The two higher zones (3,400 -3,600 m and over 3,600 m) are dedicated to dry-land production of potatoes, barley and natural pasture.In the highest zone, bitter potatoes and olluco, another Andean tuber, are important crops.Among the preliminary results of the study were:1. Food processing was found to be a common household act1v1ty carried out with home consumption as the main purpose. Over 90 percent of the households in which interviews were conducted, processed corn and barley products and nearly 40 percent processed potatoes. Women provided most of the processing labor. Of the 52 households who reported processing potatoes, only five sold part of this production.Several privately-owned mills provided the only example of village !eve! processing.2. Food processing utilizes simple and inexpensive implements commonly found in and around the house. For example, papa seca, a dehydrated product made by cooking and sundrying potatoes, needs only firewood, a cooking pot, and a sack or sheet of tin on which the cooked and peeled potatoes are placed in the sun to dry. Food processing techniques make abundant use of natural materials and phenomenon, not only sunlight, but also frost, streams and natural grasses for straw.3. The technology involved in processing potato products is highly labor intensive (see Table 39). Farmers responded that the high labor input, coupled with generally low levels of production, are the main factors limiting potato processing. Less than five percent of total production goes into processed products.4. The principle motivation of potato processing appears to be the desire to consume potatoes which cannot be eaten fresh. This category includes all the frost-resistant bitter varieties (Solanum jucepczukii and Solanum curtilobum) which must be processed before eaten because of their high glycoalkaloid content. When other varieties are used for processing, the tubers are usually small, damaged or diseased. An additional factor which limits the conversion of this type of material into processed products is their alternative use as animal feed.5. The two principle potato products, chuno and papa seca, appear to have very different uses in the Peruvian national and local diet.Chuno is primarily made from bitter potatoes by exposing the tubers to frost, pressing to squeeze out moisture, soaking in running water, and drying in the sun. Chuno is made in the higher, marginal production areas where bitter potatoes are grown, and, considered to be primarily peasant food; it is not widely consumed by the urban population. Papa seca, on the other hand, is associated with coastal and urban dietary patterns and is marketed in Lima and other large cities. The socieconomic research on seed production and distribution has been endorsed both by the TAC Quinquennial Mission as well as the recently held Social Science Planning Conference (August 1977). It has been performed within the scope of Thrust IX: Seed technology for developing countries.The research was focused on building an information base on seed systems prevailing in some selected developing countries (Colombia, Chile, Ecuador, Peru). The starting point was the hypothesis that the new seed technology, regardless of its origin, has to be delivered to farmers through a national seed system, which itself may become a major constraint for technology transfer.The research was, then, oriented to fu lfi II three specific objectives: a) to describe and analyze the organization and rationality of the production and distribution seed system; b) to identify tha main factors affecting its viability; and, c) to describe how they transfer the new seed technology.On the basis of the analysis of the seed systems in Colombia, Chile, Ecuador and other countries, an attempt was made to conceptualize the institutional organization needed to produce and deliver certified seed in a developing country.An institutional model for basic seed with clonal selection of varieties and with a public-private multiplication and distribution system of certified seed was developed.One notable finding was that developing countries, when initiating certified seed programs, very often forgot or did not take into account the conditions or assumptions that should be satisfied for the proper operation of the model. Four major economic and institutional barriers affecting the viability of the certified seed system in developing countries were identified and analyzed: a) the lack of capacity of the National Programs to produce a sufficient and uninterrupted flow of basic seed; b) adequate organization and know-how of potato programs; c) the rapid deterioration of sanitary levels of the certified seed on its way toward the final user; and, d) the lack of demand for certified seed at prices covering production cost and normal profit.Due to the general lack of information on seed production and distribution systems in developing countries, a socioeconomic bibliography on seed is being prepared. With a Ford Foundation grant, a research project on seed production systems has been carried out since January 1978 in Colombia and Ecuador.Micro-level research has been performed in Ecuador, Peru, Chile and Kenya. A methodology based on farm-level surveys has been applied in each country. The main focus of this research has been the use of seed and the effects of improved seed on farm output and incomes. Among others, the following hypotheses are being tested:1. Improved varieties have lower yields than traditional ones without the use of complementary inputs.2. There is a strong demand for high quality seed, which has not been satisfied by the official seed production services.3. Improved varieties are produced for market; traditional varieties are produced for self consumption.4. When production can be sold both as seed and as ware potato, price relationship between ware potato and seed is critical in deciding what proportion of the farmer's total output will be kept as seed.5. Under conditions of low input application, high quality seed impact is not expressed.An anthropological research study on potato folk taxonomies and seed networks in Peru was initiated this year by an American anthropologist.The overall objective of this research is to analyze the cultural framework and economic mechanisms whereby new potato varieties are identified, adopted, and distributed among Peruvian peasants. This objective may be broken down into two specific areas of research: the study of folk taxonomies associated with potato and the study of seed distribution networks. In 1977 a series of studies on potato production, distribution and utilization was initiated in the Mantaro River basin. The main objectives of this research are to provide data for the SSU's three areas of in-depth research and to provide a \"laboratory\" for field testing and training activities.From March until September 1977, anthropological research was carried out to define the major agricultural land-use zones in which potatoes are grown. These zones were mapped and described in terms of the.fr natural/ecological conditions, market orientation, production and post-harvest systems, land tenure and size of farm unit. This research provided the framework for a single-interview survey of 250 maize and potato growers in the region, carried out jointly by CIMMYT and CIP.By the end of 1977 data from this survey had been coded for computer processing and analysis.Beginning in late 1977, a subset of approximately 25 producers from the previously surveyed larger sample is being followed through an entire production cycle, using a multiple-interview survey technique. Producers are visited by interviewers each week, and detailed accounts are kept on their economic activities. This information is being used to analyze socioeconomic aspects of potato production technology in the region. Over the same 1977 /78 production cycle, data on soil nutrients, plant growth, diseases and pests, cultural practices, and other agronomic variables are being recorded for a large sample of producers (50 -75) and utilized in an analysis of factors limiting yields. In the 1978 planting season, on-farm experiments will be initiated in the Mantaro region to test agronomic and economic aspects of improved practices under field conditions. In Kenya, an economic analysis was made of potato production in various areas.Primary data were obtained through a farm survey in six producing areas.In the farm survey, major emphasis was placed on husbandry techniques, inputs, yields, costs of production, profits and market outlets. Between November 1976 and April 1977, a total of 460 farmers were contacted, out of which 441 grew potatoes in the six production areas.The survey data were analyzed preliminarily and the results compiled in brief reports, which were distributed to institutions and individuals involved in the potato sector. A more detailed computer analysis of the data is being prepared. Some preliminary results of the producer survey are presented in the following tables. From the farm survey several tentative conclusions can be drawn on the production pattern in various areas.1. In Kenya, potatoes are produced on a small scale basis; average plot size is less than 0.5 ha.2. Yields per ha are generally low.3. Production costs are high and returns to producers are marginal.4. Average farm gate prices differ significantly between growing areas.Three major types of potato producing farms have been identified:(Producer area 4 and 5) : Small farm size, fair technology level (high frequency of chemical disease control, low application rates) low yields, high farm gate prices, fair profits and low share of marketed crop.Type II (Producer area 6) : Medium sized farms, comparatively high technology level (high frequency and rate of application of chemical disease control) fairly high yields, fair prices, fair profits and high marketed share.Type Ill (Producer area 1, 2, 3) : Medium to large sized farms, low technology level, low yields, fairly low farm gate prices, low profits and medium marketed share.Center Support Communications is comprised of several sections and faci I ities. \\n editorial section consists of writing and editing Center publication. 1 yping facilities include two IBM memory typewriters and a composer.The photographic facilities consist of a studio, darkrooms and a projection room which can also be used for seminars.Art work is produced in addition to layout for publications and the production of offset plates.The printing shop has an offset press and auxiliary equip\\T)ent. This section also provides routine mimeograph and photocopying services.During 1977 the Communications section acquired new personnel and reorganized part of its work activities.One scientist was transferred to the department to work jointly in communications and training activities, an English editor/writer was hired, in addition to an audiovisual technician.An editorial committee and a training committee were organized. The editorial committee supervises the release of all scientific and general CIP publications. Located within Regional Research and Training, the training committee contains two communication staff members and several scientists who are working to coordinate the production of training aids to facilitate the transfer of CIP technology.Staff continued to produce art, audio-visual, photographic and printed material, including work for the Annual Report, CIP Circular, planning conference reports and other scientific reports. For the first time the offset plates have been prepared in the section.The audio-visual and photography section have nearly finished the reconstruction of the darkroom where black and white photography is being carried out. A color slide collection has been organized for use by CIP staff, and all existing black and white photographs have been classified.Several slide sets were updated, including Potato Diseases, Greenhouse, Stem Cuttings and Storage.At year end the CIP Circular, a monthly scientific publication was recommenced on a regular basis. The Circular, which contains articles on Center research, is distributed to about 2,000 people (mostly potato scientists) in the developing and developed world. A full-color field reference handbook. \"The Potato: Major Diseases and Nematodes,\" was also published.All publications are published in English and Spanish.The department continues to host slide-shows, seminars and workshops in Its mini-auditorium which has projection facilities and a seating capacity for 20 people.A full-sized auditorium with seating for approximately 80 people was opened in mid-year in the new wing of the main building. Larger seminars and planning conferences are held there.Communications in preparing printed materials.In early 1977 the Library staff was increased by the hiring of an assistant librarian. The head librarian entered the University of Sheffield, England, on a scholarship granted by the British Council. During her one-year study leave toward the M. S. degree in Information Science, two employees were hired on a temporary basis.Toward year end the extensive socioeconomics reference collection was transferred to the Library for integration into the Centers reference collection.As CIP becomes better known there has been a marked increase in the number of visitors.During 1977 414 professionals, officials and trainees from 42 countries visited the Center, a three-fold increase over 1976.In addition many professional and interested persons from Peru visited CIP.As in previous years, language instruction was offered to staff and wives.Mr. Jorge Palacios taught Spanish to 21 staff members and 11 wives through scheduled morning lessons, normally of one-half hour duration, two or three days a week.Earlier in the year three Spanish-speaking technicians were instructed in English. We have examined the balance sheet of THE INTERNATIONAL POTATO CENTER -CIP (a nonprofit org!.iniz!.i ti on established in Perd) as of December 31, 1977, and the relat~! statement of sour•ces and application of funds for the yeu.r then ended, Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.In our opinion, the accompanying financial state-~ ments present fairly the financial position of The International Potato Center as of December Jl, 1977, and the source and application of its funds for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis cansistent with that of the preceding year.Our examination has been made primarily for the purpose of forming the opinion stated in the preceding paragraph. The data contained in Exhibits 1 to 4 inclusive, of this report, al though not considered necessary for a fair pres en ta ti on of financial position and source and application of funds, are presented as supplementary information and have been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the examination of the basic financial statements. In our opinion, these data are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements, taken as a whole. At the balance sheet date, balances representing cash and amounts owed by or to CIP that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are adjusted to reflect the current rate.Exchange gain and losses are included in determining the source and application of funds for the period in which the exchange rates fluctuate. b. Inventories are reported at estimated prices, which approximate the cost determined on a first-in, first-out bas~s.c. Fixed assets are recorded at cost. No depreciation is accounted for.Retirements are charged to the fully expended in fixed assets capital account. Maintenance and repairs are reported as application of funds as incurred. d. Operating grants restricted to research, special projects, and capital and unrestricted grants are reported as source of funds in the period in which the donor's commitment is made, In accordance with the Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research instructions, the unexpended balances for core operations at year-end are carried forward to the following period, except when prior arrangements to reimburse the amounts unexpended exist; in such case the unexpended funds are reported as liabilities, Capital grants and special project grants unexpended at year-end are carried forward to the following period. A part of the operating grants is' used as working f•wtlH, according to the Consultative Group instructions.The CIP was constituted on June 13, 1972 1 in accordanee with 1111 Agreement for Scientific Cooperation between the Government of Peru and the North Carolina State University signed on JanuaryA summary of the significant provisions of the agreement follows: a. The objective is to establish through common or cooperative efforts a nonprofit organization of a scientific nature, dedicated to research and improvement or potatoes and tuberous roots and also to train people.b. The CIP is a tax exempt entity established in Peru.Exemption includes income tax.c. Non-Peruvian scientists working for the CIP are also tax exempt.d. The agreement will be in effect for twenty years beginning on January 20, 1971. This period may be extended.e. If for any reason the existence of the CIP is terminated, the land, buildings, equipment, vehicles and other assets of the CIP are to be transferred to the Peruvian government at no cost.f. The CIP is authorized to maintain and utilize checking accounts in foreign currencies for all operations, subject to the provisions of the law in effect for international organizations.J. COMPARATIVE FINANCIALThe balance sheet as of December 31, 1976 "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4238943525.json b/main/part_2/4238943525.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fd9338ae9207743c7ab3494606dc1e14aa80112 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4238943525.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8e2d190db2765da7070fe2ad26b782ca","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/16bbea60-10fc-412f-a945-f6b3aa6a5ccd/retrieve","id":"-432924147"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"654dc7b0-627d-410d-9baf-aba98ad7d3f7","content":"América Latina está llegando al fin del siglo en condiciones muy diferentes a las de su pasado histórico reciente. Los cambios incluyen el abandono del modelo económico de sustitución de importaciones, la creciente apertura económica, la ola continental de democratización, la recuperación económica aparente de la década de los 80 (llamada la década perdida) , la creciente polarización social, el agravamiento de los problemas ambientales, la creciente influencia del mercado, y el proceso de urbanización más intenso del planeta.La destacable homogeneidad del modelo económico adoptado por todos los países de la región (excepto Cuba, aunque también allí se están dando cambios económicos) se debe, según algunos, al convencimiento por parte de todos los gobiernos de las bondades de la economía de mercado y, según otros, a la fuerte presión internacional bajo la influencia de las organizaciones de los países industrializados .La globalización económica representa uno de los desarrollos más dramáticos de los últimos años. Entre 1965 y 1990 el comercio mundial de mercancías se triplicó, y el comercio global de servicios aumentó más de 14 veces. Los flujos financieros alcanzaron niveles gigantescos. Mas de un millón de millones de dólares circulan en el . mundo cada 24 horas buscando la mejor tasa de retorno. Este flujo de capital ofrece, por un lado, oportunidades de ganancias (y pérdidas) sin precedentes; por otro lado, ha abierto el mundo a la operación de un mercado financiero global que limita la autonomía para fijar las tasas de interés, tasas de cambio y otras políticas financieras incluso para los países más fuertes (UNOP 1996 p. 8)En este trabajo no se pretende discutir las ventajas o desventajas del modelo económico prevaleciente, sino analizar algunas de las posibles implicaciones ambientales derivadas del modo de inserción de los países de la región en la economia global.Sí es preciso anotar, sin embargo, que ya resulta claro que la aplicación de la economía de libre mercado y la apertura económica no son una panacea automática.Los indicadores de pobreza y desempleo en América, que habían descendido desde los años 50, han estado aumentando desde los años 80 (PNUO 1989, CEPAL 1995). Si bien durante el quinquenio 1990-1994 algunos países registraron éxitos en su lucha contra la pobreza, muchos otros no lo lograron; por otra parte, a partir de 1994, se dieron tendencias preocupantes en algunos de los países mencionados como exitosos mas arriba. Asimismo, el ritmo y características del crecimiento económico actual continúa generando un menor número de empleos que el necesario para absorber productivamente la creciente fuerza de trabajo (CEPAL 1995).La incidencia de la pobreza en la región aumentó un cinco por ciento en el corto período 1985-1990(un período de\"recuperación económica\" -UNOP 1996, p.60) , p.60) En América Latina y el Caribe, sólo en doce países los ingresos per capita en los años 90 fueron superiores a los obtenidos en el pasado; en veintidós países de la región, los niveles de ingreso actuales fueron alcanzados en décadas anteriores, lo que demuestra una declinación o un estancamiento económico. Lo que resulta más grave es que los últimos incluyen más del 85% de la población regional (UNDP 1996 p. 3). El crecimiento de la región en ingresos reales per capita fue de 2.9% por año en la década de los 60, de 3.7% en los 70, de -0.7% en los 80, y 1.0% de 1990de a 1993de (UNOP 1996 p. 14) p. 14).La distribución de ingresos mejoró solamente en Colombia, Costa Rica y Uruguay, y empeoró en Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Perú y Venezuela (UNOP 1996 p. 17). La desigualdad de ingresos aumentó también en México, que liberalizó rápidamente su economía a partir de mediados de los 80. En 1984, antes de las reformas, su coeficiente Gini (un indicador de disparidad) era de 0.43, pero para 1992 había subido a 0.48. Yen Chile, una de las economías más abiertas de América Latina (y considerado como ejemplo de éxito por muchos organismos financieros• internacionales), la desigualdad de ingresos ha estado subiendo marcadamente desde ' los años 70. En 1970 su coeficiente Gini era 0.45, pero para 1990 había aumentado a 0.57 (Berry, 1995).El aumento de la disparidad económica parece ser un fenómeno global, no sólo regional (WRI, 1996). En muchos países que abrieron sus economías la disparidad de los ingresos está claramente en ascenso. En las tres últimas décadas, la participación en el ingreso mundial del 20 % más pobre de la población de la Tierra se redujo de un 2,3 a un 1,4 %, mientras que la del 20 % más rico aumentó de un 70 % a un 85 % (UNOP, 1996). Las diferencias entre los países desarrollados y en desarrollo están pasando, según este último informe, \"de lo injusto a lo inhumano\".El crecimiento de la disparidad está asociado, al menos parcialmente, a la globalización de la economía. Varios países del este asíático se convirtieron en ejemplos exitosos de desarrollo dinamizado por las exportaciones -combinando un rápido crecimiento económico con una baja desigualdad y un alto nivel de desarrollo humano. En contraste, muchos países africanos del sur del Sahara han sido crecientemente marginalizados por las fuerzas de la globalización.• . . . . En el interior de los países se observa un fenómeno similar. Por ejemplo, para fines de los años 70 China comenzó a liberalizar sus mercados, privatizando su economía y abriendola rápidamente al comercio y capitales internacionales. En 1979 su coeficiente Gini era de 0.33 (menor que en cualquier otro país del este de Asia). En 1988, había subido a 0.38 -sobrepasando el de Indonesia y la República de Corea. Y la desigualdad continúa aumentando, especialmente en la zona costera, que es la más directamente ligada a la economía mundial (Tabatabai 1995) .Desde el punto de vista ambiental, el deterioro en la región latinoamericana no muestra signos de detenerse (Gallopín et al 1991, Gallopín 1995, PNUMA et al 1990, CDMA-ALC 1990). Si bien han habido algunos progresos recientes (particularmente la eliminación de incentivos económicos a la deforestación en Brasil) la situación general sigue empeorando.El problema que se plantea es: cómo afectará el proceso de globalización a estas tendencias en el caso de América Latina? Existen oportunidades para lograr un desarrollo sostenible, dentro del nuevo contexto?Es importante considerar que el contexto internacional está lejos de ser estable; de hecho, existen fuertes indicaciones de que el mundo está atravesando por un periodo de turbulencia generalizado que representa un quiebre de las tendencias históricas y una apertura de nuevas trayectorias posibles del sistema global (algunas de ellas extremadamente preocupantes). Algunos plantean que la economía mundial está \"'.avanzando hacia cambios estructurales tan profundos que sólo el concepto de evolucíón \"puntuada\" o a saltos es una metáfora apropiada (Thurow, 1996).Los megaprocesos globales impulsores del cambio incluyen:• La caída del sistema soviético, el fin de la guerra fría, y la expansión casi universal del capitalismo, afectando además a los países que permanecieron socialistas como China, algunos otros países asiáticos y Cuba.• Una demograña sin precedentes, con una pOblación juvenil en rápido crecimiento en los países pobres (97 % del aumento poblacional entre 1994 y 2015 se dará en los países en desarrollo -calculado de United Nations 1994), y una población envejecida dependiente económicamente del sistema de previsión social en los países ricos. La emergencia del \"adolescente global\" (Schwartz, 1991) representa una enorme fuerza potencial de cambio, con unos dos mil millones de miembros para el año 2000 (en un mundo crecientemente intercomunicado) y cuyo comportamiento es impredictible .• La revolución tecno-económica que se basa en tecnologías conocimiento-intensivas y que está transformando no sólo los procesos de producción sino también la estructura social, así como generando una economía global de la información y una conectividad global inusitada .• La creciente degradación ambiental y la aparición de problemas ambientales realmente globales (epitomizados por el calentamiento climático).• La polarización social creciente entre países así como dentro de ellos.• La globalización y transnacionalización de la economía, con la creciente influencia de las grandes corporaciones, la creación de nuevos bloques comerciales, y la debilitación de los estados-nación. . .'Esto muestra que la globalización es un fenómeno que excede los aspectos estrictamente económicos para abarcar dimensiones ambientales, tecnológicas, politicas y culturales.El juego de estas fuerzas puede determinar que el sistema global sufra transformaciones radicales en las próximas 3-5 décadas. Una línea puede desembocar en escenarios de \"barbarización\" representados bien por una degradación y fragmentación generalizada, caracterizadas por una alta turbulencia política y económica, o bien por un mundo autoritario donde la minoría rica mantiene (o intenta mantener) al resto de la población en condiciones de bajo consumo (Gallopín 1990) En otro extremo, también es posible un escenario positivo (una Gran Transición), donde la emergencia de un nuevo sentido de solidaridad global, combinada con el potencial de las nuevas tecnologías, y la potenciación de la sociedad civil, lleva a un nuevo orden planetario y a formas de desarrollo cualitativamente distintas.Es muy difícil predecir la dirección que predominará en el futuro. Lo que sí es posible afirmar, es que el escenario aceptado convencionalmente, basado en la continuación de las tendencias históricas y en el crecimiento económico material indefinido, es el menos probable, dada su insostenibilidad intrínseca.Es obvio que el impacto de la globalización sobre América Latina, así como la forma de inserción de la región en la economía global, serán muy distintos dependiendo del escenario global que se materialice.CARACTERIZACION AMBIENTAL DEL CONTINENTE.La gran diversidad altitudinal y latitudinal del territorio, y los distintos tipos de ambiente, determinaron el lento avance de la revolución neolítica. En el segundo milenio A.C., aparecen asentamientos sedentarios con poliproducción de cultivos (maíz, papa, frijol, calabaza), uso de riego, manejo de excedentes de cosechas, y sistemas de transporte y comunicación, basadas fundamentalmente en formas colectivas de trabajo. ..En el siglo XV se produce la llegada de las primeras corrientes conquistadoras iniciándose un período de enormes transformaciones. Una de las consecuencias fue que en pocas décadas la población indígena se redujo hasta el límite de la extinción virtual, pasando de representar posiblemente un 20% del total de la humanidad a no más de un 3% de la especie humana un siglo después (incluyendo en este porcentaje a los inmigrantes).La colonización se asentó en las áreas andinas para realizar actividades mineras y fue avanzando con la agricultura sobre las áreas montanas y de bosques secos. Paralelamente a las consecuencias ya mencionadas se produjo una explosión demográfica de las especies de animales y plantas introducidas desde Europa.La población americana siguió disminuyendo en forma más amortiguada durante los siglos XVI Y XVII, llegando a su mínimo a principios del siglo XVIII. Entre tanto el sistema colonial se fue organizando, primero con una óptica netamente mercantilista extractiva de metales preciosos destinados a las metrópolis coloniales generando una acumulación de capitales en una elite metropolitana. Posteriormente, a fines del siglo XVI, la economía colonial comienza a centrarse en 105 sistemas agroproductivos, fundamentalmente a través de las actividades de recolección organizada de productos silvestres (especies forestales preciosas, tintóreas, y medicinales) y la implantación de cultivos especializados en los enclaves y en nuevas zonas vírgenes abiertas. Estos espacios fueron los primariamente afectados por el deterioro ambiental ya que el resto del continente (hasta mediados del siglo pasado) no estaba sujeto a explotación.Después de la crisis económica de 1630 que determina el abandono de las metrópolis y la ruralización de la colonia, comenzaron a movilizarse las corrientes independentistas, pero no con una real propuesla-de cambio sino con la intención de mantener la estructura colonial, aunque manejada desde sectores de poder criollos y mestizos junto con la Iglesia, e iniciando nuevas líneas productivas de tipo primario-exportador regidas por el mercado mundial. La primera etapa independentista, creadora de los estados centralistas, propició la propiedad privada y el derecho de uso sin restricciones de todos los recursos naturales. El resultado ambiental de esta etapa podría sintetizarse en la profundización de las tendencias anteriores, que ya apuntaban hacia un deterioro ambiental centrado en los procesos de deforestación, erosión, desertificación y pérdida de la biodiversidad inicial. Estas consecuencias ambientales se vieron sólo mitigadas por el limitado alcance espacial de los sistemas productivos dominantes y por la baja intensidad de insumas energéticos que limitaban el poder de transformación de 105 sistemas naturales. La aparición del ferrocarril reforzó el sistema primario-exportador, fundamentalmente para los productos principales de cada sub región americana, y generó la incorporación de nuevas áreas en cada Estado.El sistema socio-ecológico latinoamericano, con base en la producción y exportación de productos primarios, se mostró altamente vulnerable, a principios de este siglo, frente a la economía mundial. La crisis de 1929, prolongada por la \"Gran Depresión\" hasta empalmar con la Segunda Guerra Mundial, desestructuró estos sistemas por la crisis del conjunto de productos del sistema exportador, obligando a replantear el modelo de desarrollo y marcando un antecedente inmediato a la situación de la región a finales del siglo XX.Los volúmenes físicos de exportación, y los términos de intercambio, se redujeron fuertemente a partir de 1930, así como el PBI de la región, que sólo se recuperó en el período de la última Guerra Mundial. La crisis no redujo el nivel de dependencia de la región, y los países, a excepción de Argentina, debieron suspender el servicio de la deuda externa.En el período de casi medio siglo transcurrido entre la crisis que precedió a la Segunda Guerra Mundial y el estallido de la crisis actual, las transformaciones experimentadas por el ambiente regional fueron más intensas que las sufridas durante los cuatro siglos anteriores y sólo podrían compararse con los cambios derivados del encuentro de principios de siglo XV. En las últimas décadas las fuerzas sociales de la región se transformaron y movilizaron recursos tecnológicos sin precedentes modificando de manera radical sus sistemas naturales y productivos.Los grandes cambios vinculados a lo ambiental, operados entre 1950 y 1980 se podrían sintetizar en: ampliación de las superficies agrícolas dedicadas a cultivos de ciclo corto, ampliación de las áreas de pastizales permanentes, reducción de las zonas cubiertas por bosques y selvas y ampliación de las áreas ocupadas por obras de infraestructura y asentamientos. Estos cambios ambientales se debieron a la implantación regional de un nuevo modelo de desarrollo por parte de los Estados y al fomento del desarrollo urbano-industrial y la inversión privada extranjera. En este período no se buscó la inserción en el mercado manufacturero internacional sino el crecimiento sobre la base de la expansión del mercado interno, mediante políticas de industrialización por sustitución de importaciones con fuertes medidas proteccionistas, sobrevaluación de las monedas nacionales e impulso de la importación de bienes de capital para la infraestructura industrial. Esto generó un notable auge económico, reforzado también por el aumento del valor de intercambio de los productos primarios y generándose una fuerte vinculación entre los grupos agroexportadores tradicionales y los nuevos grupos dominantes urbano-industriales.El costo ambiental de las nuevas estrategias productivas fue elevado; se subordinó la consideración del ambiente a la necesidad de un cambio acelerado. En este período las grandes ciudades crecieron rápidamente como consecuencia del empleo generado por el sector industrial y la expulsión de mano de obra desde las áreas rurales donde las nuevas tecnologías agropecuarias, sumadas a los problemas de tenencia de tierra, desplazaban al trabajador tradicional. En torno a las ciudades crecieron las áreas marginales y surgió un sector laboral informal, articulado de alguna manera en su actividad al sector laboral formal de la industria (aunque este último nunca pudo llegar a tener un crecimiento simétrico al de la población).Durante este período también se afianzaron los procesos de avance de la frontera 6 .. ,• .. agrícola, fundamentalmente a expensas de las zonas boscosas. En las áreas tropicales se expande la ganadería para responder a una sostenida demanda externa y al mercado interno de los sectores urbanos de altos recursos. Esta ganaderización del territorio generó profundos deterioros ambientales debido al uso de áreas no aptas para esa actividad y la colonización de zonas de bosque con tecnologías completamente inadecuadas que llevaron al deterioro a corto plazo de las mismas.Como consecuencia de esto se habilitaron continuamente nuevas áreas para desplazar la actividad productiva, sin cambiar la tecnología (manteniéndola extensiva), con pocas inversiones, concentración de tenencia de la tierra y rentabilidad promedio elevada. Junto al costo ambiental es necesario señalar el elevado costo social: desplazamiento de las formas productivas tradicionales reduciendo el empleo rural, expulsión de la población e incremento de las diferencias sociales.La actividad agrícola también tuvo una evolución hacia formas productivas con tecnificación creciente, reducción de mano de obra, especialización de agroecosistemas y uso intensivo de capital y tecnología, dentro del paradigma de la llamada Revolución Verde. De esta manera se aumentó la vulnerabilidad de los sistemas de producción y se incrementó fuertemente la dependencia en relación a los insumos necesarios para producir. Paralelamente el sector campesino de subsistencia, con buenos rendimientos (para los niveles de tecnología que emplea y las tierras marginales a que fueron desplazados), queda fuera del sistema agroempresarial exportador y su marginación crece haciéndole incrementar la presión sobre el medio en que habita. El sector forestal participa fundamentalmente como apartador de tierras, ya que en general tiene poca incidencia en el PBI regional y los bosques se usan en forma depredadora.Lo expuesto hasta aquí representa el modelo por sustitución de importaciones que comienza a sentir los efectos de las primeras fluctuaciones de la balanza de pagos, el déficit público y las perturbaciones económicas a principios de la década del 70, para llegar al final de dicha década con un período de desestabilización económico-social en la región que marca el comienzo de la última crisis. Esta se precipita al trasmitirse a la región desequilibrios mundiales que incidieron sobre estructuras internas de la misma. Una de las causas internas fue la deuda social en lo económico, político y cultural, impulsada por una estrategia de desarrollo que generó rápidamente un sector social moderno, consumista y exportador y un sector cada vez más marginal de bajos ingresos, dentro de economías familiares con insuficiencias alimentarias, educativas, de vivienda y servicios. Otras causas internas fueron el fuerte proceso inflacionario y de endeudamiento por el uso del crédito externo para desarrollar el sector industrial y financiero, el escaso margen de participación y redistribución, los regímenes de facto y/o no representativos que expulsaron gran cantidad de gente fuera del sistema contribuyendo al empobrecimiento y marginalización de importantes sectores de la población. Como causas externas se pueden señalar la restricción de mercados de los países industrializados con la consiguiente contracción del comercio mundial, el deterioro de los términos de intercambio, la desfavorable inserción en el mercado internacional, la revolución tecno-económica mundial, y el aumento de las tasas de interés financiero internacional con enorme impacto sobre la deuda externa.A partir de mediados de los años 80, un nuevo modelo se difundió en toda la región, enfatizando la liberalización del comercio, exportaciones no tradicionales, y al menos en algunos casos, la liberalización cambiaria y financiera.Fuertes procesos de privatización se dieron y continúan dándose en la región. Un claro esfuerzo para atraer capitales extranjeros es evidente en toda la región asi como la expansión de las compañías transnacionales. En muchos países la inflación se redujo dramáticamente, y las tasas de crecimiento económico, deprimidas durante la \"década perdida\" de los Las exportaciones de mercancías en América Latina crecieron a una tasa anual promedio de 3 % en los 80, y para el final de la década la región atraía alrededor de un tercio de los flujos privados de capital a los países en desarrollo (UNDP 1996 p. 17).Los efectos ambientales de este nuevo modelo económico no están todavía totalmente documentados; por otra parte, debido a que muchos procesos ecológicos se desenvuelven en escalas temporales de décadas, hay impactos reales que todavía no han sido percibidos. Algunos de los ejemplOS más claros de los impactos de este modelo son la intensificación agrícola para cultivos de exportación, en muchos casos en forma insostenible (como en el Cerrado brasilero -da Silva 1994), la externalización de costos ambientales que hace que la soja producida en la frontera agrícola boliviana se exporte a Colombia a precios más bajos que la producida localmente (a pesar de una larguísima ruta de transporte) y la desmantelación de la infraestructura (alambrados, tanques de agua) asociados a la rotación agrícola-ganadera en las Pampas argentinas, pasando de un modo de producción relativamente sostenible a uno que muestra crecientes problemas de degradación ambiental. Algunos de los impactos se discutirán más adelante.La región en su conjunto está relativamente bien dotada en términos de recursos naturales. Con poco más del 8% de la población global, América Latina tiene 23% de las tierras potencialmente cultivables, 10% de las tierras cultivadas, 17% de las pasturas, 22% de los bosques (y 52% de los bosques tropicales), y 31% del agua dulce de escorrentía utilizable en forma estable (Tabla 1). Cuenta además con no menos del 8. ,• • ... 3% de las reservas mundiales de combustibles fósiles y el 19% del potencial hidroeléctrico técnicamente utilizable (Tabla 2) .Este perfil favorable a nivel de toda la región, presenta sin embargo importantes diferencias internas. La presión demográfica es alta en algunos de los países, y baja en otros. Hay países en los cuales la tierra utilizada y la potencial para la producción de cultivos alimenticios es escasa en comparación con la población presente y la estimada para el futuro. América Latina, en su conjunto, sólo alcanzaría a alimentar aproximadamente e140% de la población proyectada para el año 2030, de utilizar un nivel bajo de insumas. Más de la mitad de los países sudamericanos (Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Perú, Suriname y Venezuela) y prácticamente todos los países centroamericanos deberían sobrepasar el nivel intermedio de insumas (equivalente al utilizado en la actualidad en la región) y 11 países (Ecuador, Perú, Surinám, Venezuela, Bahamas, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haití, Jamaica, Santa Lucía y TrinidadfTobago) no alimentarían su población del 2030 aún utilizando un nivel alto de insumas (recalculado de los datos básicos del modelo FAO/FNUAPIIIASA, 1984 por Gómez y Gallopín, 1995).Si bien existen importantes oportunidades ambientales para el desarrollo de la región, también existen grandes problemas en todos los países, los que se discutirán más adelante.La heterogeneidad ecológica de la región se expresa en el hecho que se pueden reconocer 18 zonas de vida principales, aproximadamente del nivel de biomas, que incluyen desde bosques húmedos tropicales hasta desiertos extremos.Desde el punto de vista ambiental, tomando en cuenta simultáneamente los criterios de comparabilidad ecológica y tipos de actividad humana relativamente similares, es posible diferenciar un conjunto de grandes unidades ambientales que permiten tener una visión de conjunto de la región (Tabla 3 y Figuras 1 y 2). Estas grandes unidades representan una reagrupación de las 18 zonas de vida. La Tabla 4 presenta una estimación de la distribución de la población para las diferentes unidades ambientales y zonas de vida.Las.grandes zonas ambientales naturales son las siguientes (Gallopín et al. 1991):Bosques húmedos tropicales y sub tropicales•. Ocupan el 41 % del total de la región (8,3 millones de km 2 ) caracterizándose por una vegetación exuberante con bosques densos, con una arquitectura de estratos múltiples. Se extienden a lo largo de la cuenca Amazónica, ocupando también la costa Pacífica de Ecuador, Colombia y Panamá y las zonas bajas del Caribe y el Atlántico brasileño. La productividad primaria a El término \"subtropical-como se usa aquf incluye las zonas subtropicales propiamente dichas y las templado-cálidas (Winograd 1995b) neta aérea b de estos bosques varía (según los ecosistemas específicos de que se trate) entre 10 y 15 toneladas de peso seco (42 a 64 millones de Kcal) por hectárea y por año. Muchos de estos ambientes no tienen gran población humana (la densidad promedio estimada es de 9.9 personas por Km2) y en la actualidad son las zonas de avance de la frontera agrícola tanto en Sudamérica como en Centroamérica y México. Sin embargo, existen actividades económicas tradicionales como la recolección de b La productividad primaria neta aérea es la tasa de producción neta de biomasa vegetal (troncos. hojas y ramas), excluyendo la producción de raíces, y descontando el consumo metabólico debido a la respiración de las plantas. Se expresa comúnmente en peso seco (el peso fresco o vivo puede representar entre el doble y cinco veces el peso seco en los vegetales), y es un indicador gosero de la oferta ecológica de producción natural disponible. Todas las estimaciones de productividad primaria presentadas aqui están basadas en cálculos de Isabel Gómez y en datos de Gómez y Gallopln (1995a). Sabanas y pastizales tropicales y subtropicales. Ocupan el 10% de América Latina (2,1 millones de km 2 ) caracterizándose por ser formaciones abiertas dominadas por pastos. Esto ha hecho de estas zonas las grandes productoras ganaderas en el trópico y ganadero-cerealeras en el subtrópico y zonas templadas (Pampas). La productividad primaria neta promedio es de alrededor de 5 Ton/Ha/año, ó 20 millones de Kcal. Existen grandes diferencias entre las sabanas y pastizales tropicales y los subtropicales, pues los primeros poseen suelos relativamente poco fértiles, mientras que los segundos (Pampas) poseen suelos muy fértiles. Actualmente las Pampas se encuentran en su totalidad ocupadas por las actividades agropecuarias, representando gran parte de la producción de carne y cereales de América Latina y el Caribe. Las ciudades principales en esta zona son Córdoba, Buenos Aires, Montevideo, Rosario, Curitiba, y Cuiaba. La densidad promedio es de 19.2 personas por Km 2 . Desiertos y semidesiertos. Ocupan una superficie de 3,6 millones de km 2 (el 18% de la región). La productividad primaria es menor de 5 Ton/Ha/año, o 23 millones de Kcal. En los Andes cuando se alcanza el límite superior de crecimiento de los árboles, aparecen zonas con una vegetación baja y escasa, consecuencia de las condiciones climáticas (heladas, poca lluvia, vientos, etc.), conocidas como Puna y Páramo, formaciones típicas de las alturas tropicales americanas. Al mismo tiempo, en el sur la lluvia disminuye en los Andes hacia el este y el oeste, apareciendo comunidades vegetales áridas y semiáridas, como la estepa patagónica y el espinar chileno. La vertiente occidental de los Andes peruanos-bolivianas-chilenos posee zonas desérticas y semidesérticas costeras (entre las que sobresalen el desierto de Atacama). En el norte de la región latinoamericana también existe otra gran zona carente de bosque, consecuencia de la aridez, representada por el desierto mexicano. En algunas regiones de estos ambientes, se encuentran zonas densamente pobladas (como la Puna peruana-boliviana y la zona de Ciudad de México) y ocupadas por culturas milenarias (Incas y Mayas) que han dado origen a importantes cultivos como la papa y el maíz. Esta zona ambiental incluye las ciudades de México, La Paz, Lima, Puebla, Callao, Iquique, Arequipa, y Cuzco. La densidad poblacional varía, según las zonas de vida, de cero a 325 personas por Km 2 .En América Latina y el Caribe existen muchos y graves problemas ambientales, así como un número de oportunidades no aprovechadas.Todos los análisis de la historia reciente de América Latina indican claramente tasas de deterioro ecológico muy altas y aceleradas, expresadas bajo las formas de deforestación, desertificación, erosión y agotamiento de suelos, contaminación agrícola, industrial y doméstica, acumulación de desechos, vulnerabilidad creciente ante derrumbes, sequías e inundaciones catastróficas (Sunkel y Gligo 1980;Dourojeanni 1982;Gallopín 1995). El problema no consiste en la mera transformación o alteración de los ecosistemas naturales, sino en la modalidad y resultado de estas transformaciones, que implican una degradación de la base ecológica de la producción, una verdadera pauperización y destrucción de los recursos naturales renovables y los procesos ecológicos vitales de la región. Muchas de estas alteraciones, tales como la desertificación y la erosión de los suelos, son irreversibles en términos prácticos. Por otra parte, los problemas ambientales en los asentamientos humanos son muy serios, y continúan agravándose.En la región se han hecho esfuerzos para identificar y priorizar los principales temas ambientales regionales (COMA-AL 1990, Gallopín et al. 1991), temas que pueden ser considerados en su conjunto como los más prioritarios para América Latina y el Caribe. Los dos temas dominantes en la actualidad son los asociados al uso de las tierras y los asociados al ambiente urbano, frente a los cuales los demás (aunque son importantes en sí mismos) palidecen en términos relativos.La Tabla 5 presenta los principales temas ambientales regionales (involucrando tanto problemas como oportunidades para el desarrollo). Además de esos temas regionales, también se han identificado temas ambientales internacionales (que afectan a más de un país de la región) y temas globales (que afectan a toda la humanidad y requieren de la colaboración de todos los países) prioritarios para la región.• Cuencas compartidas • Guerras convencionales (su impacto ambiental) • Precipitaciones ácidas • Destino y tráfico de residuos tóxicos Los temas ambientales globales prioritarios para la región son:• El riesgo nuclear • El calentamiento climático global • La producción, tráfico y consumo de drogas • La pérdida global de biodiversidad • La destrucción de la capa de ozono estratosférico Las limitaciones de espacio no permiten entrar en mayor profundidad en estos temas que, por otra parte, están más detallados en la bibliografía citada. Sí es tal vez importante destacar que los temas citados están entrañablemente interconectados, a pesar de la impresión de separabilidad que da el listado anterior. Tomando como ejemplo el caso del uso de la tierra, que ha sido definido por la Comisión de desarrollo y Medio Ambiente de América Latina y el Caribe como el más prioritario de todos, es posible identificar algunas de las prinCipales interconexiones y verificar la presencia de causalidades múltiples (Gallopín et al. 1991). .'Ello tiene implicaciones importantes para la definición de estrategias. Como ejemplo, la Figura 3 muestra las principales interrelaciones que operan en la región y la compleja causalidad de los problemas ambientales relacionados con el uso de la tierra. La figura es un diagrama simplificado y generalizado que intenta tomar en cuenta los principales factores y relaciones que ocurren en toda la región; es claro que algunos de estos factores y/o relaciones pueden no tener vigencia en ciertos países o zonas específicas de la misma.Varias son las lecciones que surgen de un intento de abarcamiento integral, aún si es tan elemental como el presentado en la figura .• El diagrama indica claramente las interconexiones sistémicas entre problemas ambientales. La actividad ganadera, en menor grado la agrícola, yen mucho menor grado la forestal y la caza, realizadas en forma inadecuada, son los principales factores directos que conducen a la erosión y pérdida de fertilidad de los suelos, la desertificación, la deforestación, la pérdida del germoplasma y la vida silvestre, la destrucción de la capacidad de regulación hídrica, la degradación de pasturas, las intoxicaciones y la contaminación por agroquímicos, resultando también en cambios climáticos locales (y contribuyendo a los globales) yen aumentos en la frecuencia e intensidad de las inundaciones. Estos efectos ambientales, que interactúan fuertemente entre sí, se traducen finalmente en reducciones de la producción agropecuaria, y en impactos negativos de varios tipos sobre la salud y la economía. Los impactos ambientales de la globalización pueden materializarse a través de muchas cadenas causales .• El diagrama indica el rol determinante de los diferentes tipos de actores socíoeconómicos. La degradación de las tierras de América Latina y el Caribe se debe por un lado a la acción de los pequeños productores y las poblaciones marginadas (particularmente campesinos sin tierra, colonos itinerantes, y población rural expulsada de otras áreas; la agricultura campesina tradicional y establecida ha demostrado históricamente una alta sustentabilidad en muchos casos) y, por otro lado, a la acción de los grandes y medianos productores (principalmente los grandes propietarios y las empresas agropecuarias nacionales y transnacionales). Otro actor importante en la degradación ambiental de la región es el mismo Estado que muchas veces, y a menudo con el apoyo económico y la participación de agencias internacionales de financiación, ha implementado proyectos de desarrollo y de infraestructura (embalses, carreteras, explotaciones mineras, etc.) que no prestaron atención a los factores ambientales, con consecuencias catastróficas en un número de casos e . La Tabla 6 presenta un resumen de los actores sociales involucrados y las principales motivaciones para el caso de la deforestación en los trópicos de América Latina. Nuevamente, los distintos actores serán afectados en forma diferente por los procesos , Los impactos ambientales directos sobre el uso de tierras de estas obras no están representados en el diagrama por razones de legibilidad.de globalización y de cambio tecnológico, estimulando diferentes tipos de respuestas con implicaciones ambientales.• El diagrama destaca la gran diferencia existente entre los condicionantes de la presión de uso, la adopción de tecnologías inadecuadas, y la utilización de tierras no apropiadas, que operan sobre los productores pobres, por un lado, y los grandes productores, por el otro. En otras palabras, la diferencia entre las presiones originadas en los intentos de satisfacer las necesidades mínimas de supervivencia, y las originadas en los criterios de rentabilidad económica cortoplacista.• El diagrama permite visualizar las estrechas vinculaciones entre los procesos de empobrecimiento social, el crecimiento demográfico, las migraciones, y el aumento de la presión de uso de las tierras en la región. La existencia de estos vínculos implica la imposibilidad de resolver los problemas ambientales asociados a la pobreza sin atacar simultáneamente las causas que la generan. En este sentido, es claro que la erradicación de la pobreza, objetivo central desde el punto de vista social, lo es también desde el punto de vista ambiental. La polarización económica asociada actualmente a la globalización es por lo tanto preocupante no sólo desde el punto de vista social, sino incluso del ambiental.• El diagrama muestra claramente la importancia de la búsqueda de nuevas estrategias socio-ambientales que sean capaces de atacar coordinada, racional y simultáneamente circuitos multicausales completos, incluyendo tanto factores locales y nacionales como internacionales o globales. La políticas puramente sectoriales son incapaces de proveer la solución a problemas complejos como los considerados aquí; ha sido frecuente en la región que el mismo éxito de una política sectorial implicara unagravamiento del problema general, debido a las reverberaciones que se trasmiten por • todo el sistema. Esto marca la necesidad urgente de una nueva visión política en términos de sistemas complejos, capaz de tener en cuenta las interacciones múltiples y dinámicas, a distintas escalas desde lo local a lo global, así como la necesidad de nuevos y ágiles mecanismos de coordinación y concertación capaces de operar simultáneamente en forma trans-escala (local/nacional/global).Como se indicó en la introducción, el proceso de globalización va mucho más allá de sus dimensiones económicas y más aún del comercio internacional. En este trabajo, sin embargo, se hará énfasis en los aspectos económicos y tecnológicos, en la convicción que el fenómeno de globalización está íntimamente asociado a la revolución tecno-económica .Desde el punto de vista económico, es interesante destacar que, contrariamente a lo expresado por muchos de los proponentes del comercio sujeto sólo a las leyes del mercado, la teoría económica no afirma que el libre comercio internacional es siempre • deseable, o que un sistema de libre comercio, que conduzca a la distribución de la producción global de acuerdo a las ventajas comparativas, sea necesariamente beneficioso para todos los países miembros. Esta suposición está basada en el argumento que los países pueden obtener beneficios mutuos a través de la especialización y el comercio de acuerdo a sus ventajas comparativas, aún en el caso que un país tenga una ventaja absoluta en la producción de todos los bienes. Esto es correcto, dadas las premisas del modelo. El problema radica en que algunas de las premisas más fundamentales no se dan en la realidad. Tal como lo plantean Daly y Goodland (1994), si los mercados fueran perfectos y el capital fuera inmóvil internacionalmente, entonces el comercio desregulado de los productos sería ventajoso para todas las naciones. Pero en la situación real en que los precios generalmente no reflejan los costos sociales ni ambientales, y con una situación caracterizada por la alta movilidad del capital, el comercio des regulado puede perjudicar a los países. Por ejemplo, cuando el capital y bienes son móviles internacionalmente 2 las ventajas comparativas a nivel de naciones pierden relevancia porque diferentes factores de producción (incluyendo en algunos casos la fuerza de trabajo) de distintos países atravesarían las fronteras nacionales de acuerdo a la lógica de las ventajas absolutas, no de las ventajas comparativas relativas 3 .Otro argumento discutible presentado por los proponentes de la desregulación total del comercio internacional es que ello ayuda a mejorar el ambiente porque genera crecimiento económico que, al mismo tiempo que estimula un aumento de la demanda para protección ambiental, provee también los recursos necesarios para ello. (GATT, 1992en Ekins et al 1994). Ello no toma en cuenta el problema que ciertos tipos de crecimiento económico generan degradación ambiental por sí mismos, ni la existencia de daños ambientales irreversibles (como la extinción de especies) (Ekins et al 1994(Ekins et al , R0pke 1994) ) El argumento más común es que el crecimiento y la liberalización económica son buenos para el ambiente, sobre la base que las preferencias de los consumidores y la estructura de la economía cambian a medida que un país se desarrolla, que el desarrollo trae nuevas tecnologías (a menudo más limpias) y que las economías en crecimiento pueden invertir más fácilmente en mejoras ambientales. Según este argumento, los países en estadías \"tempranos\" de desarrollo necesariamente se concentran en la producción básica y mejoras de la infraestructura, aceptando el costo ambiental asociado. El argumento se apoya en las correlaciones entre degradación ambiental e ingreso per cápita (curvas de Kuznets ambientales), que sugieren que el crecimiento económico empeora las condiciones ambientales hasta un cierto punto, pero que a mayores niveles de ingreso, el crecimiento económico adicional está asociado a una mejora de las condiciones ambientales (WRI 1996).Si bien algunos indicadores ambientales tales como acceso a agua potable, condiciones sanitarias urbanas, y calidad del aire urbano, realmente muestran una mejoría con el aumento del ingreso, otros indicadores mU~¡:¡[l (Í~'IieiE(rioro'Pl'Og~sivo (por ejemplo las emisiones de anhídrido carbónico y los residuos urbanos per cápita). Las curvas de Kuznets ambientales, basadas en correlaciones empíricas, no toman en cuenta la posibilidad que la degradación ambiental pueda perjudicar las posibilidades de crecimiento económico futuro, ni la posibilidad que parte de la reducción en la contaminación observada en los países industrializados pueda deberse a la transferencia de industrias contaminantes a los países en desarrollo, un proceso no replicable por estos últimos (WRI, 1996).Aún en aquellos casos en que las curvas de Kuznets son aplicables a indicadores ambientales, debido a que la gran mayoría de la población del mundo tiene ingresos medios por debajo de los puntos de inflexión estimados de las curvas, se esperaría que el crecimiento económico en esos países (y para esas variables) continúe aumentando la contaminación. Por otra parte, es difícil anticipar el efecto de la polarización económica de la globalización en el contexto de estas curvas (en otras palabras, qué pasa cuando el crecimiento económico se hace negativo para algunos grupos y países) El argumento general desde el punto de vista ambiental no es el que el comercio internacional es negativo y que la autarquía es deseable, sino que cierto grado de regulación es necesario para llegar a un \"libre comercio sustentable\" (De Bellevue et a/ 1994) o a un \"intercambio comercial balanceado\" (Daly and Goodland 1994).El aspecto tecnológico de la globa/ización es tan importante que se puede hablar de una verdadera revolución tecno-económica o \"Tercera Revolución Industrial\", liderada por la microelectrónica y la informática, y acompañada por una constelación de desarrollos basados en nuevas tecnologías intensivas en ciencia (biotecnología, nuevos materiales, nuevas fuentes de energía, nanotecnología, etc.). Esta nueva ola de innovaciones de ritmo vertiginoso, y los cambios socio-económicos asociados a la emergencia de la economía de la información, llevarán a reestructuraciones drásticas de las sociedades, muchas de ellas difíciles de imaginar hoy.El desarrollo y dífusión de las nuevas tecnologías en la región tiene el potencial para producir cambios ambientales muy significativos (tanto beneficiosos como perjudiciales, directos como indirectos). Es posible anticipar que tales cambios resultarán en impactos importantes sobre los ecosistemas latinoamericanos, implicando efectos mayores sobre la sustentabilidad ecológica de las actividades productivas, alteraciones en los ciclos subregionales del agua y los nutrientes, cambios en los rendimientos agrícolas, desaparición de algunos ecosistemas y aparición de nuevos ecosistemas, cambios en la oferta ecológica de recursos naturales, modificaciones en los factores limitantes y las restricciones ecológicas, etc.Se generarán impactos ambientales directos a través de la utilización de las nuevas tecnologías en relación a los cultivos alimenticios, industriales y energéticos; la explotación de nuevos recursos naturales renovables y no renovables, la creación y 16 • ' .• ., dispersión de nuevas formas biológicas, la emisión de nuevas substancias al ambiente, etc. Un intento de identificación de posibles efectos directos aparece en Gallopín (1995a).Los impactos ambientales indirectos se generarán a través de las reacomodaciones sociales, económicas, políticas y demográficas que se darán como consecuencia de los cambios en los precios y demandas, en la organización social del trabajo, en los sistemas de producción, en el empleo, en la división internacional del trabajo, en los servicios, y en la relocalización y naturaleza de actividades y asentamientos humanos, inducidos por la penetración de la nueva ola tecnológica.Desde el punto de vista de sus implicancias ambientales, muchas de las tecnologías nuevas y emergentes muestran interesantes diferencias con el anterior paradigma tecnológico. Los atributos de mayor interés estratégico del nuevo paradigma se pueden caracterizar como: ambivalencia, flexibilidad, e intensividad en conocimiento.Ambivalencia: Es claro que la informática, microelectrónica y las telecomunicaciones pueden ser utilizadas para centralizar la información y el poder de decisión y control, pero tienen también el potencial para la descentralización de las decisiones, aumentar la participación, y para vincular áreas aisladas y remotas; la biotecnología puede favorecer la concentración monopólica de la producción agrícola a gran escala o puede ser aplicada para aumentar los rendimientos de los agricultores de subsistencia de pequeña escala.Flexibilidad: Las nuevas tecnologías permiten (potencialmente) una más fácil adaptación y ajuste a las condiciones sociales y ecológicas locales, un aspecto extremadamente importante para la sustentabilidad del desarrollo. La informática hace posible (y económicamente eficiente) la implementación de nuevos modos operativos, tales como la \"manufactura flexible\", la \"producción a medida o a pedido\", y la minimización de existencias (o \"inventario cero\"); modos incorporados en los recientes conceptos de reingeniería de organizaciones. Ello conduce a que la escala de planta se independice crecientemente de la escala de cada mercado, y la productividad de la escala de planta, con profundos cambios en los factores definitorios de la competitividad (Pérez 1986). Esto último implica un aspecto muy significativo que marca una diferencia con el paradigma anterior: en muchos casos las nuevas tecnologías no están (inherentemente) asociadas a economías de escala.Intensividad en conocimiento: las nuevas tecnologías son, en términos generales (de hecho o potencialmente) mucho más eficientes en el uso de la energía y materiales que las tecnologias modemas de la posguerra. Se las puede calificar como tecnologías \"conocimiento-intensivas\" o \"ciencia-intensivas\" más que capital-intensivas, energíaintensivas, o material-intensivas. Las nuevas tecnologías están disminuyendo la relación materias primas/producto, están sustituyendo materiales (un claro ejemplo es el reemplazo del cableado de cobre por la mucho más eficiente fibra óptica en comunicaciones; asimismo, la base material de la microelectrónica es el silicio, uno de los elementos más abundantes del planeta); y están aumentando la eficiencia de otros procesos (como en el caso de la regulación electrónica de la combustión en los automóviles). Todo ello puede contribuir al proceso actualmente visible de relativa desmaterialización de la economía, a conservar recursos naturales, ya reducir la contaminación por unidad de producción o consumo.Tanto la globalización económica, en el sentido de la eliminación de barreras al intercambio entre países, como las nuevas tecnologías mencionadas, representan posiblemente una etapa inevitable en la evolución de la civilización. Estos procesos obviamente tienen el potencial de mejorar notablemente las condiciones de vida de la población humana, tanto en el Norte como en el Sur, racionalizar el uso de los recursos ecológicos y humanos planetarios, y reducir los conflictos militares.Pero del potencial a la realización hay un largo camino. En un mundo asimétrico (y donde las desigualdades siguen creciendo) no existe ninguna garantía que los beneficios potenciales serán percibidos por todos o por la mayoría de la población. A menudo se argumenta que cierto costo social es inevitable en una transición histórica, sacrificios transitorios que serán compensados por una mejoría general. Nuevamente, esto puede ser así, pero no está garantizado. En un mundo asimétrico, el riesgo de un sufrimiento humano innecesario monumental de la transición tecno-económica es elevado, y el riesgo de una consolidación y acentuación de las desigualdades conduciendo a una barbarización mundial no es despreciable.Aunque la globalización ha contribuido en muchos casos al crecimiento en los países fuertes, ha pasado por alto a los débiles. Los paises más pobres, que incluyen el 20 % de población mundial, han visto caer su porción del comercio mundial (de 4 % a menos del 1 % entre 1960 y 1990), Y reciben un magro 0.2 % de los préstamos comerciales del mundo (UNDP 1996 p. 9).Los flujos totales de capitales a los países en desarrollo se triplicaron entre 1987 y 1994. Su composición se movió marcadamente desde la ayuda oficial al desarrollo (AOD) hacia los flujos de capital privado, los que aumentaron de una participación de 37 % de los flujos totales al 76 % . En términos reales, la AOD cayó en 9 % entre 1985 y 1993. La septuplicación de los flujos privados a los países en desarrollo, de 25.1 miles de millones en 1987 a 172.9 miles de millones en 1994, podría creerse que compensa en cierto grado la caída de la AOD. Pero los fondos privados generalmente han ignorado los países en desarrollo con mayor escasez de capital, dirigiendose en su lugar hacia los \"mercados emergentes\" semi-industrializados. De los flujos totales en 1993,68 % fueron a Argentina, China, México, Singapur y Turquía. La inversión extranjera directa (que no sólo provee capitales frescos sino que aporta niveles tecnológicos superiores) también está concentrada; se estima que un valor récord de 37% (84 mil millones de dólares) llegó a los países en desarrollo en 1994. Casi el 40% de ese valor fue a China. Otro 24 % fue a Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malasia, Singapur y Tailandia. En contraste, el Africa al sur del Sahara sólo recibió el 3.6 %, Y los países Desde una perspectiva político-histórica, es importante reconocer que la globalización y la \"tercer revolución industrial\" no representan (en cuanto a su origen) una transición a una nueva formación social, sino una revolución producida dentro de la formación social capitalista, y generada por ella. Esta globalización, y el nuevo paradigma tecnoeconómico dominante, asociados a la emergencia de un nuevo patrón económico, social y cultural, representa la respuesta del \"capitalismo de organización\" a la crisis de agotamiento de las potencialidades del paradigma surgido de la posguerra para asegurar el crecimiento económico y político de las grandes organizaciones estatales y privadas de los países más industrializados. El nuevo paradigma sería así un producto de esas grandes organizaciones, con potencialidades que responden funcionalmente a las necesidades de las mismas, quienes lo generan, hegemonizan y desarrollan. En consecuencia, el aumento de grados de libertad para la sociedad humana permitido por el cambio técnico, tiende a distribuírse en forma desigual; la nueva libertad es adquirida principalmente por las grandes organizaciones de los países más avanzados'.Entre las tendencias centrales del nuevo paradigma figuran la concentración del poder en las grandes organizaciones; la distribución crecientemente asimétrica del ingreso entre clases sociales y naciones; el desempleo tecnológico (aunado a una polarización del perfil de la fuerza de trabajo en detrimento de la mano de obra calificada); y la pérdida de autonomía de los países en los que las organizaciones mayores (específicamente las empresas transnacionales y los estados más poderosos) no tienen su núcleo principal de dirección, actividad y desarrollo (Nochteff 1987). El agregar, a instancias de los principales países industriales, la apertura del sector servicios a la competencia internacional, lleva a una enorme centralización del poder en las corporaciones transnacionales (que ya controlan el 70% del comercio internacional) y el GATT, a expensas de una debilitación adicional de los estadosnación (Daly & Goodland 1994).Estas tendencias, negativas en general para América Latina, son las que surgen de la lógica del proceso tal como se originó y se está dando, y las que afectarían a la región de continuar la actual determinación (esencialmente exógena) de la globalización y la incorporación del cambio tecnológico.En general, los patrones de intercambio y los arreglos institucionales asociados (como el GATT) reflejan las relaciones de poder entre y dentro de los países (R0pke, 1994) . Ello indica que, si se espera que el libre comercio contribuya a paliar las injusticias y desigualdades, algún tipo de acción deliberada, más allá del libre juego de las fuerzas del mercado, será necesario. En otras palabras, el libre comercio sin ningún tipo de regulación tenderá \"espontáneamente\" a favorecer a los países y grupos ya poderosos, además de algunos otros pocos, como los \"países recientemente industrializados\" 5 . Desde el punto de vista ambiental, existe un claro conflicto entre una política internacional de desregulación comercial y una política nacional de internalización de los costos ambientales. Un país que internaliza sus costos ambientales en sus precios pierde competitividad frente a un país que no los internaliza (Daly y Goodland 1994). Esto puede calificarse como el \"efecto pionero\": salvo que todos los países acuerden internalizar sus costos ambientales, los países que lo hacen primero son penalizados por el sistema de intercambio no regulado.El otro riesgo ambiental de la globalización económica en ausencia de regulación es la tendencia lógica, en una situación de alta movilidad internacional del capital, a competir internacionalmente para atraer capitales, no a través de aumentos en la eficiencia, sino a través de un descenso en los estándares (sociales, ambientales, y salariales -Daly & Goodland 1994).La situación actual de América Latina frente al proceso de globalización y a la nueva revolución tecnológica es muy diferente a la de los países industrializados (los cuales están teóricamente en condiciones de afrontar esos cambios en forma relativamente no traumática 6 , debido a su capacidad instalada de producir bienes y servicios, la cobertura de las necesidades materiales básicas para la gran mayoria de la población, la existencia de mecanismos sociales de amortiguación -como, entre otros, el todavía vigente seguro de desempleo-, y su población básicamente estabilizada), e incluso se sostiene (Herrera 1986) que es peor que la que tuvo la misma región en el pasado, durante el proceso de \"modernización\" que alcanzó a nuestros países después de la posguerra. No debe olvidarse que, al mismo tiempo que una minoría de la población mundial vive en la civilización \"post-industrial\", en América Latina y el Caribe coexisten las diferentes olas tecnológicas: no sólo la nueva ola tecnológica, sino la revolución industrial e incluso la revolución agrícola (grandes masas campesinas sobreviven a niveles pre-industriales). Como lo hace notar el Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, uno de los riesgos de la globalización es que los grupos y personas con menor capacidad de adaptación a las cambiantes condiciones del mercado y menor capacidad de adopción de nuevas tecnologías o habilidades sean diferencialmente más marginalizados (UNDP 1996 p. 103). Esto es directamente aplicable a la creciente población marginal de la región.La problemática ambiental planetaria representará seguramente en el futuro uno de los ámbitos más claros de interdependencia (y por lo mismo, de espacio de negociaciones) entre los países industrializados y los países en desarroll0 7 • En muchos otros aspectos, la revolución tecnoeconómica posibilita una autonomía cada vez mayor de los países avanzados con respecto al mundo en desarrollo y a los recursos planetarios (algunos llegan a plantear que el desafío principal para el mundo en desarrollo es hoy, no ya meramente el cómo reducir la dependencia, sino el cómo evítar ser simplemente excluídos del sistema económico mundial). A nivel de América Latina, de no adoptarse o de no ser posible una actitud activa y auto-dependiente en defensa del desarrollo sostenible de la región, la situación parece mucho más 20 . ..La pérdida de autonomía de los países latinoamericanos para definir los patrones de producción, consumo y distribución, y la concentración del poder en las empresas transnacionales implican la penetración de racionalidades económicas exógenas, y la probabilidad de una debilitación adicional de la retroalimentación entre actividades económicas y deterioro ecológico\". Esto generaría una tendencia hacia la sobreexplotación de ciertos recursos naturales, la subutilización de otros, y la externalización de los costos ecológicos desde las grandes organizaciones hacia la región. Dado el contenido del nuevo paradigma tecnoeconómico tal como es impulsado, es esperable un reforzamiento de la tendencia al desajuste entre la estructura de producción y la de consumo, orientando aún más la producción hacia la exportación y hacia la demanda de sectores minoritarios de altos ingresos, con presiones para generar nuevas demandas y reducir la vida útil de los bienes durables, acentuando así la producción de desperdicios que fluyen al ambiente 9 y la marginalización de amplios sectores de la población (que pasan a contribuir a la degradación ecológica generada por la pobreza).La orientación de la producción hacia los bienes de consumo no esenciales, y la evidente tendencia explosiva hacia el aumento de la oferta y diversidad de bienes de consumo durables contribuyen a generar una presión indefinidamente creciente sobre el ambiente y los recursos escasos con destino a usos no esenciales lO, mas aÚn considerando que las tendencias no favorecen una transición hacia el consumo colectivo de los bienes y servicios que así lo permitan, sino que acentúan el consumo individual, multiplicando el número de unidades necesarias para satisfacer la demanda.La tendencia actual es hacia una descentralización mundial de los sistemas de producción industriales, pero centralizando el control de la creación del conocimiento\". En el caso de la microelectrónica, las inversiones de empresas transnacionales en la región serían las dedicadas a la realización de tareas cada vez menos remunerativas y de menor importancia tecnológica, a menudo adoptando la forma de \"enclaves\" sin encadenamientos con el resto del sistema productivo local. En el campo de los materiales, las direcciones de cambio aparentes son por un lado, la reubicación geográfica de la producción de materiales tradicionales en busca de ventajas comparativas en el costo de la energía, o para aprovechar ahorros en costos de transporte y la flexibilidad que otorga la cercanía a la fuente; por otro lado, la creciente diversificación de las plantas en los países desarrollados en el área de los nuevos materiales más sofisticados y apropiables. La tendencia hacia la re localización de industrias de alto potencial contaminante hacia los países en desarrollo es bien conocida. Esto podría mejorar en la medida que se incluyan normas de protección ambiental en los tratados de comercio internacional; nótese que esto ya implica una regulación del comercio.Todos estos elementos confluyen a que la localización de industrias y otras actividades productivas probablemente tienda cada vez más a ignorar los límites ecológicos locales y la adecuación ambiental de la radicación de actividades, con el consiguiente agravamiento de los problemas ambientales. No puede dejarse de lado la posibilidad que algunos ambientes de la región sean utilizados por grandes organizaciones como espacio de prueba de nuevos desarrollos tecnológicos de alto riesgo ambiental o para explorar ventajas comparativas del germoplasma o la organización ecológica local '2 .Por su origen y racionalidad, es obvio que las tecnologías y formas productivas generadas por las grandes organizaciones del mundo desarrollado no tenderán espontáneamente a adaptarse a las necesidades y potencialidades de los países de la región. Ello implica que las nuevas tecnologías, introducidas bajo determinación exógena, en la mayoría de los casos contendrán desajustes significativos en cuanto a su adaptación a los ciclos ecológicos de los ecosistemas locales.Otro macroefecto previsible de acuerdo a la lógica exógena de la difusión tecnológica es el desajuste entre la estructura de producción y el perfil de la dotación de recursos naturales en los países de la región, generando tendencias a la aplicación de presiones excesivas sobre algunos recursos, y simultáneamente al desaprovechamiento o sub-utilización de otros. La racionalidad de las grandes empresas transnacionales, así como su capacidad de movilidad de capital en el espacio mundial, tendería en muchos casos a inducir niveles de utilización de los recursos naturales renovables por encima de las tasas ecológicas de regeneración, llevando a la degradación de los ecosistemas productivos y abandonándolos (degradados) cuando su rentabilidad se haga inferior a la de otros lugares alternativos del planeta. La presión para exportar y competir internacionalmente puede generar fuertes estímulos para producir en tierras inapropiadas, así como a generar una competencia interna con las tierras dedicadas a la producción de alimentos básicos.El insumo fundamental dentro del nuevo paradigma tecnoeconómico es la ciencia, cada vez menos separada de la tecnología, más directamente vinculada a los requerimientos de las organizaciones hegemónicas, y más concentrada en los países desarrollados y las grandes organizaciones. Al mismo tiempo, el \"proteccionismo científico-tecnológico\" de esas organizaciones, reflejado en las políticas de publicación y patentamiento yen la tendencia a no transferir tecnologías \"desincorporadas\" de los bienes, confluyen a que las tecnologías se tornen crecientemente \"opacas\", ya reducir la posibilidad, por parte de los países de la región, de copiarlas y/o adaptarlas. El GA TI plantea considerar el conocimiento como propiedad privada en vez de como patrimonio de la humanidad, y favorece el patentamiento del germoplasma y los organismos vivos. Todos estos factores contribuyen a obstaculizar la adaptabilidad de las tecnologías a los potenciales y restricciones ecológicas locales (con excepción de las que estén específicamente diseñadas para ser reprogramadas y adaptadas).El ensanchamiento de la brecha de ingresos entre los países avanzados y los de la región, y la tendencia estructural al desequilibrio del sector externo regional permiten inferir una relajación de las normas de protección ambiental y ecológica y una acentuación de la tendencia a la sobre-explotación de la base ecológica productiva con 22 ,.• '.destino a la exportación. Estas tendencias, combinadas con las tensiones sociales debidas al creciente desempleo tecnológico y la distribución regresiva del ingreso, están llevando a muchos países de la región a funcionar con \"economías de guerra\", abandonando los objetivos ambientales (y sociales) del desarrollo. Por otra parte, es posible que algunos acuerdos regionales de libre comercio propicien una relativa homogeneización de criterios de protección ambiental y social. El riesgo es, sin embargo, que la homogeneización de estándares se haga \"para abajo\" mas que \"para arriba\". La movilidad internacional del capital (en combinación con el libre comercio de los productos) estimula una competencia internacional basada en la disminución de estándares (en vez de aumentos en eficiencia) en aras de bajar los costos para atraer el capital. El evitar la competencia basada en reducción de estándares requiere mas que la simple liberalización del comercio (Daly y Goodland 1994).Las tendencias al desempleo tecnológico llevarían a un aumento de la marginación que pOdría /legar a revertir en algunos países el flujo prevaleciente de movimiento del campo a la ciudad, con consecuencias ecológicas sobre los ambientes rurales.Las tendencias a la polarización del ingreso dentro de los países, a través de sus impactos sociales, favorecerían el aumento del deterioro ecológico asociado a la pobreza, así como el asociado al sobreconsumo.El continuo aumento de la conectividad \"vertical\" entre lo global y lo local asociado a la globalización puede generar consecuencias impredictibles. La creciente integración de la población mundial a los mercados (yen muchos casos directamente a los mercados mundiales como por ejemplo los pequeños productores y los obreros que trabajan para firmas transnacionales) aumenta la dependencia frente a factores cada vez más lejos del control local.La producción campesina actualmente es sensible a factores distantes que operan a través de sutiles canales. Un aumento en las tasas de interés de los bancos de EE.UU. puede disparar cambios de politica a través del mundo en desarrollo (dado que los costos del servicio de la deuda externa están vinculados a las tasas de interés internacionales), políticas que afectan directamente las vidas de los pequeños productores de subsistencia, así como las consecuencias ambientales de sus acciones. Malelta (1988) analiza varias cadenas causales operando a diferentes escalas en el caso de la agricultura campesina en la zona andina.Otro fenómeno asociado a la globalización y la revolución tecnológica puede tener implicaciones sistémicas muy profundas. En general, en todos los sistemas jerárquicos (conteniendo componentes y procesos que operan a diferentes niveles y escalas) los subsistemas de menor nivel funcionan más velozmente (con menor escala de tiempo) que los subsistemas y procesos de nivel macro. La globalización está llevando a que, por un lado, los diferentes sistemas locales se conecten cada vez más en un sistema global; y por otro lado, debido a la operación de una red global de telecomunicaciones en combinación con nuevos sistemas concentrados de toma de decisiones operando a escala planetaria (particularmente empresas transnacionales), la dinámica en el nivel global en varias dimensiones se está haciendo más rápida que a los niveles inferiores. Las consecuencias de este fenómeno son impredictibles.Desde el punto de vista ambiental, las consecuencias de la inserción de los productores campesinos al mercado pueden variar fuertemente dependiendo de la \"racionalidad económica\" del productor '3 .Los impactos ambientales ligados a la redefinición general de las ventajas comparativas son difíciles de anticipar dada la posibilidad de surgimiento de nuevas ventajas insospechadas, y la probable multiplicación del número de factores que definen las ventajas comparativas (y el aumento de la volatilidad de las mismas). La disminución del peso relativo de los costos salariales en el nuevo paradigma tecnoeconómico tenderá a reducir la importancia de las ventajas comparativas de la mano de obra barata, afectando las posibilidades de desarrollo de los países que basaron su crecimiento en ese factor (aunque a corto plazo el proceso de globalización puede resultar en una competencia laboral Norte-Sur, estimulando una tendencia hacia productos y procesos intensivos en mano de obra -Daly & Goodland 1994). La disminución de la relación materias prima/producto, y la sustitución de materiales, afectarán más directamente a los países que basaron su proceso de acumulación de capital en sus recursos mineros o en sus recursos forestales. Las nuevas tecnologías (y particularmente la biotecnología) ya están afectando a los productores agropecuarios tradicionales (tanto del Norte como del Sur) transfiriendo la tasa de ganancia y el control de la producción y comercialización hacia las grandes empresas transnacionales químicas y farmacéuticas y hacia los grandes comercializado res. Los avances en rendimientos agropecuarios dentro de los países avanzados (posibilitados por los nuevos desarrollos tecnológic:s) están reduciendo las ventajas comparativas edáficas y climáticas, cerrándose mercados tradicionales para los productos agropecuarios de América Latina, e incrementando la competencia internacional para esos productos por parte de los países centrales.Varias son las ventajas comparativas que podrían surgir en países de la región, con disímiles consecuencias ambientales. La gama abarca las ventajas referidas al acceso a fuentes de energía barata, las asociadas a la reducción de costos de transporte por cercanía a la fuente de recursos naturales, las de radicación otorgadas por legislaciones ambientales o sanitarias permisivas (una ventaja perversa), las de aprovechamiento de las condiciones o componentes ecológicos o climáticos locales, etc. En términos ecológicos, este mosaico cambiante de ventajas comparativas en los países de la región podría generar riesgos de violentos incrementos en la presión de explotación sobre espacios o ecosistemas frágiles o remotos actualmente poco intervenidos, la brusca puesta en valor de elementos o funciones ecológicas particulares (y la pérdida de valor de otros), la implantación de nuevas formas , biológicas e incluso de ecosistemas exóticos a la región, etc. En ausencia de regulación social, estos fenómenos pueden terminar en la sobre-explotación y degradación de los ecosistemas regionales (yen la pérdida de las ventajas comparativas que pudieran estar asociadas a ellos) .El panorama ecológico inferible en este escenario regional es francamente desalentador (si bien incluye algunos aspectos positivos más o menos puntuales). Paradójicamente, el potencial técnico para un manejo sostenible de los ecosistemas, para el control, monitoreo y reducción de la contaminación ambiental, para la adaptabilidad de las plantas y tecnologías a las condiciones sociales y ecológicas locales, para un aumento espectacular de la producción de satisfactores de las necesidades humanas, para la diversificación de usos de los recursos ecológicos, y para el desarrollo ecológicamente sostenible a largo plazo, es hoy más alto que en cualquier momento del pasado.Sin embargo, la dirección en que se están configurando las trayectorias del nuevo paradigma tecnoeconómico permite anticipar que, a menos que América Latina adopte estrategias activas sostenidas, definidas endógenamente, y compartidas entre actores sociales y entre países de la región para realizar los cambios estructurales sociales, económicos y tecnológicos necesarios, el potencial técnico mencionado se tenderá a plasmar en los paises más avanzados, mientras que la región corre el grave peligro de concentrar los efectos perversos de la revolución tecnoeconómica 14.Si bien parte del análisis en esta sección se ha concentrado en los posibles efectos ecológicos regionales de las tecnologías de punta, no se debe olvidar el impacto, de igualo mayor importancia, de la difusión de tecnologías ya existentes (\"modernas\") y del cambio de productos. Ambos fenómenos están directamente ligados a la globalización económica. La historia reciente de América Latina muestra impresionantes corrimientos de productos y tecnologías en el sector agropecuario. Esto indica que los efectos ecológicos de las nuevas tecnologías no reemplazarán en America Latina a los de las tecnologías \"modernas\" y las \"tradicionales\" sino que se sumarán a ellos, por lo menos durante las próximas décadas.Aunque la predicción detallada del futuro impacto ambiental de la globalización sobre América latina es imposible (debido a la multiplicidad de factores interligados que, más que una sumatoria de transformaciones aislables, representan verdaderos complejos causales reverberando a través de redes de factores como la representada en la Figura 3), es posible explorar trayectorias futuras que representan alternativas plausibles basadas en la información disponible.En este espíritu, se realizaron estudios prospectivos basados en modelos de simulación sencillos de las transformaciones ecosistémicas debida al uso de tierras en cada una de las 18 zonas de vida nombradas en la Tabla 3, con un horizonte de tiempo de 50 años, comenzando en 1980. (Gallopín 1992, 1995, Gallopín y Winograd 1995).Las tierras, en cada zona de vida, sufren transformaciones anuales determinadas por los diferentes usos, el escenario adoptado, y las características generales de la zona de vida. Las categorías de tierras son las siguientes: \"Natural\": áreas no perturbadas de vegetación primaria y áreas perturbadas en el pasado pero que actualmente tienen una vegetación similar a la original; \"Alterado\": áreas alteradas por las acciones humanas (explotación forestal, agricultura migratoria, ganadería, etc.) coexistiendo con el ecosistema original y con vegetación secundaria; \"Agrícola\": áreas sembradas y cosechadas anualmente, incluyendo cultivos anuales, permanentes, y no tradicionales; \"Ganadero\": áreas con pasturas naturales o artificiales bajo uso ganadero; \"Plantaciones\": áreas reforestadas para explotación forestal o para protección de cuencas; \"Eriales\": áreas con severos procesos antropogénicos de erosión y desertificación, con cambios irreversibles en su estructura y función (no incluye los desiertos naturales); y \"Urbano\": áreas urbanizadas. Dos escenarios socioeconómicos básicos fueron definidos por toda la región: de referencia y sostenible.El escenario de referencia implica la continuación parcial del estancamiento económico de los 80, seguido por un aumento moderado del crecimiento económico regional. Los estilos de desarrollo se mantienen pero con una creciente influencia de la globalización y de las compañías transnacionales sobre la economía; las nuevas tecnologías entran en la región bajo determinación exógena. No hay un viraje perceptible hacia la implementación de políticas ambientales y de sustentabilidad. El énfasis en la producción agrícola es hacia la exportación, yen segundo lugar, al consumo interno. El escenario de referencia también supone una reducción gradual en el avance de la frontera agropecuaria en las zonas tropicales, y un aumento general de la intensificación del uso de la tierra.El escenario sostenible contiene un énfasis en la autodeterminación (no autarquía) e implica políticas para mejorar la distribución del ingreso, la implementación de estrategias activas científicas, tecnológicas y ambientales, y el desarrollo de nuevos sistemas de producción agrícola. El énfasis principal de la producción agrícola es en la diversificación de cultivos con destino al consumo interno, y sólo en segundo lugar, a la exportación.Las características generales de los dos escenarios aparecen en la Tabla 7.Aunque los escenarios no se limitan a los aspectos de apertura económica, es claro que el escenario de referencia representa una actitud más pasiva de la región frente a la globalización, mientras que el escenario sostenible implica una actitud autodependiente.La comparación de las resultados bajo los diferentes escenarios permite tener una idea del impacto de la globalización Gunto con otras variables) según sea la actitud regional pasiva o activa.Los resultados de los modelos, dada la extrema sencillez de los mismos en comparación con la complejidad de los procesos ecológicos y sociales que se desenvuelven en la región, y las incertidumbres inherentes a los datos primarios y secundarios existentes (los que presentan en algunos casos vacíos significativos que obligaron a completarlos con hipótesis razonables sometidas al escrutinio de expertos), deben ser tomados como indicativos y nó como resultados numéricos definitivos ni como intentos de predicción detallada. Algunos de los resultados han sido revisados en base a datos posteriores (Winograd 1995a) pero los cambios no son demasiado notables.Los resultados detallados de las simulaciones para cada zona de vida y por década se pueden consultar en Gallopín (1995a), Gallopín y Winograd (1995), Winograd (1995). Aquí solo se presentarán los resultados globales (Figura 4) para toda la región.Para toda la región los resultados sugieren la transformación de 5 millones de hectáreas por año (como promedio para los próximos 50 años) de ecosistemas vírgenes y semi-vírgenes. El 78% de esta superficie provendrá de las áreas tropicales, el 19% de las áreas subtropícales, y sólo el 3% de las áreas templadas. El 45% de esta área transformada pasará a ser tierra agrícola (30% bajo agricultura migratoria, 15% bajo agricultura permanente); el 30% se usará para ganadería y el 22% para explotación forestal. Erosión de suelos. Originada por la deforestación, las técnicas agrícolas inapropiadas, el sobrepastoreo y la sobreexplotación. Afectará particularmente a los bosques montanos húmedos tropicales y subtropicales, y los bosques húmedos subtropicales de América Central, los países andinos, y Brasil. En menor grado, las pampas argentinas continuarán sufriendo erosión. Degradación de cuencas. Debida a la deforestación y la construcción de presas; afectará principalmente a los bosques húmedos montanos y basales tropicales y subtropicales de América Central, los países andinos, ciertas partes de América del Sur, Brasil y México, así como a los bosques templados húmedos de Chile y Argentina.Inundaciones. Debidas a la degradación de cuencas, deforestación y procesos naturales; afectarán principalmente a los bosques húmedos montanos y basales tropicales y subtropicales de América Central, los países andinos y Brasil, y algunas de las sabanas, bosques subtropicales, y pampas de los países andinos, Argentina, Brasil y Bolivia.Deserlificación. Asociada al sobrepastoreo, la extracción excesiva de leña y las sequías cíclicas, avanzará principalmente en las estepas patagónicas, la Puna, los bosques secos tropicales, los matorrales desérticos tropicales y subtropicales, y los matorrales espinosos templados en los países andinos, Brasil, Argentina, Chile, Perú, México y América Central.Contaminación. Continuará en muchas de las tierras cultivadas en toda la región; la contaminación agrícola, industrial y urbana aumentará en los deltas y manglares de América Central, el Caribe y partes de América del Sur. Déficit de leña. Continuará aumentando en la mayoría de los ecosistemas. La escasez de leña debida a la deforestación y sobre-explotación de los bosques afectará a mas de 50 millones de personas en las zonas áridas y los altiplanos andinos en los próximos 30 años.En el caso del escenario sostenible, la región es capaz de satisfacer de un modo sostenible los requerimientos internos de agricultura, ganadería, pesca y explotación forestal dentro de los próximos 50 años, con un substantivo superávit para la exportación.Los tres principales procesos que dan cuenta de una gran parte de la dinámica en este escenario son: 1) El énfasis sobre la rehabilitación productiva de los ecosistemas deteriorados y alterados (que hoy cubren el 22% del área terrestre total) representando la estrategia más realista para manejar muchos de los complejos ecosistemas ... tropicales y subtropicales; 2) La prioridad hacia los sistemas integrados de producción rural (agricultura -ganadería-explotación forestal -acuacultura) los cuales son favorecidos cuando sea apropiado; y 3) La búsqueda activa de la integración de las nuevas tecnologías con las tecnologias tradicionales y modernas. Además de las diferencias cuantitativas con el patrón derivado de las tendencias actuales, los cambios cualitativos en la modalidad de producción rural implican una reducción drástica de los procesos ecológicamente degradantes discutidos previamente.Para toda la región estas cifras implican la transformación de 2 millones de hectáreas por año de ecosistemas vírgenes y semi-vírgenes (la mayoría en áreas tropicales). Las áreas protegidas representan un 35% de los ecosistemas naturales existentes. Los ecosistemas alterados cubrirán el 20% del área, la misma cifra que en el escenario tendencia!. Sin embargo, en este escenario la mayor parte de las tierras alteradas se convierten en tierras productivas (14% bajo explotación forestal y 6% en proceso de rehabilitación). Las tierras cultivadas aumentan al 13% (7% bajo agricultura intensiva, 3% bajo uso agro-silva-agropecuario, y 3% bajo agricultura migratoria). Los pastizales disminuyen debido a los incrementos en la capacidad de carga (15% bajo sistemas de pastoreo intensivo y semi-intensivo y el 7% se integra con la explotación forestal). Como consecuencia de las actividades de rehabilitación y restauración, los eriales se reducen a la mitad de su superficie inicial.Un efecto positivo no planeado de este escenario es que, debido al fuerte énfasis sobre la reforestación y agroforestería implicado por el mismo, para el año 2030 se habrían reforestado 64 millones de hectáreas (principalmente en las áreas alteradas). Esto representa el 14 % del área mundial que se estima que compensaría, de ser reforestada, el exceso antropogénico de carbono atmosférico (Sedjo, 1989). Nótese que las emisiones estimadas actuales de origen biótico de la región representan entre el8 y 10 % del total mundial (Gallopín y Winograd, 1995). ,• La factibilidad ecológica, tecnológica y económica de este escenario está argumentada en detalle en Gallopín y Winograd (1992Winograd ( ,1995)).El eScenario de referencia sugiere el tipo de consecuencias ambientales relacionadas con el uso de tierras que tendría una apertura económica irrestricta en el marco de una ausencia o debilidad generalizada de políticas ambientales y sociales. Esta debilidad caracteriza la situación general de la región en la actualidad.Los problemas ambientales afectarían críticamente las economías y las sociedades en varios países de la región..El escenario sostenible muestra que, desde el punto de vista ecológico y tecnológico, es posible, sin costos económicos directos demasiado grandes'5, cambiar de rumbo hacia una situación mucho más deseable a largo plazo.La principal incógnita radica en la factibilidad política de este escenario, ya que va en contra de todas las tendencias recientes en la región y de las fuerzas macroeconómicas desatadas en las últimas décadas.Sin embargo, debe tenerse en cuenta que las tendencias actuales son claramente insostenibles ecológica y socialmente (y según algunos análisis también son insostenibles en el plano económico- The South Centre, 1996).Se quiera o no, será indispensable buscar nuevas alternativas a la trayectoria actual.A partir del análisis de los modelos de simulación así como de estudios de caso y la evaluación de las oportunidades y limitaciones ambientales a nivel regional (Gallopín 1995), se destacan los siguientes elementos de importancia estratégica para avanzar hacia el desarrollo sostenible de América Latina y el Caribe.• El análisis de las tendencias actuales muestra claramente que el estilo de desarrollo prevaleciente en la región es ecológicamente insostenible y por lo tanto inviable a largo plazo.• A nivel de la región como un todo, no existen restricciones ecológicas graves para el desarrollo sostenible, ni para la conservación de las áreas requeridas para mantener las funciones y servicios ecológicos esenciales. Sin embargo, a nivel de algunos países hay restricciones ecológicas importantes (tales como escasez de tierras cultivables), así como claras complementariedades ambientales, y por lo tanto la cooperación intraregional será esencial.• Actualmente la falta de disponibilidad de tecnologías no se evidencia como un obstáculo crítico para el desarrollo sostenible de la región (en el sentido de representar un cuello de botella a nivel regional)'•. Esto no niega la necesidad de llenar las lagunas de conocimiento existentes en el manejo de algunos ecosistemas.• Las tecnologías nuevas y emergentes pueden jugar un papel muy importante en la sustentabilidad tanto en lo específicamente ambiental como en lo general. Es posible identificar grandes prioridades regionales para la investigación y desarrollo sugeridas por el análisis ambiental (Gallopín 1995a). Muchas de ellas no están presentes en las actuales prioridades oficiales de los sistemas científicos de los países de la región.• América Latina y el Caribe es una región de alta heterogeneidad ecológica, social y 30 ','.. '• . s productiva. Diferentes actores sociales y tipos de producción coexisten en ambientes disímiles. Una estrategia basada en el pluralismo tecnológico (uso complementario de tecnologías tradicionales, \"modernas\", y de punta) es esencial para una gestión sostenible de la heterogeneidad.• El pluralismo productivo, con coexistencia de diferentes grandes tipos de sistemas productivos rurales, integrados a través de políticas locales, nacionales y regionales, representa una alternativa más apropiada que la homogeneización productiva desde el punto de vista de la sustentabilidad del desarrollo.• En términos de sustentabilidad ambiental el concepto de hibridización tecnológica (integración constructiva de tecnologías nuevas y emergentes en tecnologías tradicionales o modernas) asume particular importancia, requiriendo nuevas formas de organización y una estrategia integral para el desarrollo y difusión tecnológicas.• El área de aplícación de las nuevas tecnologías sofisticadas no se reduce al sector \"moderno\" de la economía (esencialmente urbano-industrial). Estas tecnologías pueden cumplír un papel muy importante, dado el contexto actual de la región, en la generación de nuevas soluciones a problemas tales como los de la pobreza critica, utilizando la ciencia y la tecnología de punta para desarrollar nuevas y eficaces soluciones de tecnología simple accesible a las poblaciones marginales, o en la reformulación y revalorización de tecnologías nativas cuyo uso esté extendido en la región. Esto implica el uso de tecnologías de punta para desarrollar soluciones de \"simplicidad sofisticada\".• Un principio importante es el de la integración entre las diferentes áreas de las nuevas tecnologías. A menudo se presupone, por ejemplo, que el campo de aplicación de la biotecnología está limitado a la agricultura o a la industria fármacológica, y que el campo de aplicación de la informática es el sector servicios y el industrial. La integración entre las áreas de nuevas tecnologías puede posibilitar sinergias muy importantes (por ejemplo en el campo de la agricultura campesina -Gallopín 1995 a).• Debido a las múltiples interconexiones entre factores asociados a la globalización, a la velocidad y turbulencia de los cambios, y a la impredictibilidad de muchos de ellos, será crítico para la región el desarrollar estrategias dirigidas a generar una capacidad genérica social y ecológica para responder a los cambios en forma ágil, flexible, y proactiva. Esta capacidad generalizada es tanto o más importante que las medidas específicas implementadas para afrontar desafíos puntuales.• Un principio estratégico importante frente a las incertidumbres crecientes y la falta de recursos suficientes para ponerse a seguro de todos los posibles impactos negativos de la globalización es el buscar desarrollar \"estrategias ligadas\" siempre que resulte posible. El concepto, propuesto por Schneider (1989) en el contexto del calentamiento climático global, es también valioso en referencia al impacto ambiental de la globalización económica. Ello implica dar preferencia a aquellas acciones dirigidas a evitar o adaptarse a los cambios negativos, o aprovechar los cambios positivos de la globalización económica, que al mismo tiempo provean claros beneficios sociales y ecológicos aún si los cambios anticipados no se materializan o aparecen otros factores inesperados 17.La situación actual de la región bajo la influencia de los nuevos cambios globales, incluyendo, en lo negativo, una enorme deuda externa, una distribución crecientemente regresiva del ingreso, un relativo estancamiento económico, una población en continuo crecimiento, y un continuado deterioro ambiental, yen lo positivo, una reducción de la inflación, una desaparición de las dictaduras militares, y una creciente cooperación económica regional, ha resultado en una discontinuidad en la trayectoria histórica, yen grandes incertidumbres con respecto al futuro. La situación actual parece representar un punto de ruptura en las tendencias históricas 'de la región, y una \"explosión de novedad\". La globalización y el impacto social y económico de la difusión de la nueva ola tecnológica con toda probabilidad operarán como factores disparadores de reestructuraciones globales y regionales, con profundas consecuencias sociales, económicas, culturales y ambientales. Las nuevas direcciones resultantes en principio podrían conducir a un empeoramiento pero también a una mejora de la situación con respecto a las tendencias del pasado; en particular, el futuro ecológico de América Latina (tanto en términos de recursos naturales como de habitabilidad) dependerá muy fuertemente de la manera en que se resuelva la crisis y de las grandes opciones sociales adoptadas en la región dentro del contexto turbulento de la situación mundial actual. En otras palabras, el futuro ecológico de América Latina y las posibilidades de aprovechar las oportunidades ecológicas al mismo tiempo que se minimizan las restricciones, están mucho más directamente ligados a las grandes opciones sociales adoptadas en la región que a la búsqueda de nuevos conocimientos y nuevas técnicas de manejo ecosistémico (aunque éstos son también necesarios).Hoy están abiertos varios escenarios socioeconómicos potenciales para el futuro del mundo y de la región; aunque en cada uno de ellos sería posible identificar posibilidades para el mejoramiento del manejo y conservación de los recursos ambientales, las oportunidades y restricciones varían fuertemente a través de los distintos escenarios.Los países de América Latina necesitan definir e implementar nuevas estrategias de desarrollo, que permitan incorporar las oportunidades implícitas en las transformaciones económicas y en las nuevas tecnologías sin pagar enormes costos sociales, económicos y ecológicos. Tales estrategias, para que sean viables (además . ': . de deseables) deberán ser social, económica y ecológicamente sostenibles a largo plazo. Por lo tanto, deberían apuntar hacia el logro de una sociedad que, como atributos básicos, incremente fuertemente la participación de la población en las decisiones, tienda a una distribución equitativa de la riqueza, y sea intrínsecamente compatible con su ambiente. Este es un desafío mucho mayor, y de diferente índole, que el de la competitividad económica a nivel internacional.Esta nuevas estrategias nacionales y regionales de desarrollo deberán apoyarse fuertemente en la ciencia y la tecnología, con príoridades y metas fijadas por los países de la región. Esto es indispensable debido al fuerte componente tecnológico de punta (ciencia-intensivo) que caracteriza al proceso de globalización y para aprovechar el potencial inherente en las nuevas tecnologías para el progreso de la región.El análisis realizado deja en claro que la liberalización económica no es necesaria o automáticamente beneficiosa para los países, y mucho menos una receta garantizada para el desarrollo sostenible.Algunos analistas incluso sostienen que las políticas de liberalización y globalización, predominio del mercado y debilitación del estado han fracasado tanto en los países industriales como en las economías emergentes del Asia, y que el rápido crecimiento de estas últimas se debió a la aplicación de políticas precisamente opuestas a las ~ preconizadas por los adalides de la liberalización total (The South Centre 1996).Esto contrasta con la posición de los organismos financieros internacionales y muchas otras organizaciones que mantienen que la globalización económica será inmensamente beneficiosa para el Sur y que los países en desarrollo deben por lo tanto acelerar su integración total en la economia global a través de una liberalización extensiva y rápida, y que la mejor vía al desarrollo es fomentar el papel del mercado, reduciendo la función del estado a mantener un ambiente apropiado para el florecimiento de la empresa privada y el funcionamiento de mercados competitivos.Una conclusión inapelable es que, al menos desde el punto de vista ambiental y social, los paises de América Latina deberían definir cuidadosas politicas de integración selectiva al mercado mundial, en vez de una rápida apertura incondicional.Además de las dificultades inherentes a la definición de la integración estratégica requerida en diferentes países de la región, es obvio que las actuales tendencias internacionales representan un fuerte obstáculo para cualquier estrategia definida endógenamente (particularmente para los paises más pobres, pero incluso para los más fuertes).Sin embargo, aún dentro de los escasos márgenes de maniobra determinados por las restricciones actuales, es posible adoptar líneas estratégicas que favorezcan una orientación hacia un desarrollo más sustentable en la región.Cuando las corrientes son fuertes y turbulentas, hayal menos dos estrategias posibles: la del transatlántico, cuya potencia y solidez afronta los embates de los elementos, y la del kayak, cuya agilidad le permite sortear los rápidos en base a pericia y capacidad de reacción. Es obvio que las competencias requeridas y las acciones adecuadas para conducir cada uno de estos navíos son muy diferentes.Es posible que los países de América Latina y el Caribe deban concentrarse en la metáfora del kayak a nivel nacional, yen la del transatlántico a nivel regional (o incluso extra-regional, apoyandose en alianzas estratégicas y real cooperación internacional).En síntesis:• La globalización es un proceso multidimensional que excede en mucho las dimensiones económicas del libre comercio internacional y del esquema neoliberal.• Una apertura irrestricta de las economías no es, en general, conducente al desarrollo sostenible; el libre juego de las fuerzas del mercado genera espontáneamente asimetrias y desigualdades, y no puede garantizar la sustentabilidad ecológica.• Actualmente ya se están percibiendo y documentando algunos de los efectos (tanto positivos como negativos) de la apertura económica y de la globalización.• la globalización exhibe una ambivalencia esencial con potenciales positivos y negativos. Por lo tanto es necesario orientar los procesos de globalización identificando y utilizando elementos y criterios de importancia estratégica.• Resulta de fundamental importancia conectar al proceso de globalización una ética, una responsabilidad, y una gobernabilidad. En caso contrario, se corre el riesgo de caer en un escenario de barbarización general.• la sustentabilidad ambiental del desarrollo plantea interrogantes específicos a las estrategias frente a la globalización (por ejemplo, el papel de los diferentes horizontes de tiempo de las decisiones económicas y de los procesos ecológicos).• la posición actual de América latina y el Caribe frente al proceso de globalización es débil. En esas condiciones, las estrategias posibles son:• Dejarse llevar por la corriente (lo que parece ser la actitud actual). Esto, por las razones argumentadas anteriormente, parece ser suicida (o al menos una actitud que sólo puede beneficiar a una minoria, excluyendo a la mayoría) .• Cambiar el sistema global desde la América Latina y el Caribe. Esto es. , .• . -.. : dudosamente factible, y dependería de la capacidad de la región para concertar alianzas con otros actores internacionales .• Navegar creativamente (la estrategia del kayak -que no es sinónimo de dejarse llevar) aprovechando la fuerza de la corriente pero instalando al mismo tiempo los gérmenes del propio futuro. Pero esto es posible sólo si se adopta una visión de largo plazo, sistémica y multicausal, dirigida a crear una sociedad intrínsecamente compatible con su ambiente. Implica medidas coordinadas y secuenciadas dirigidas a dar frutos a distintos plazos (institucionales de corto plazo, educativas para el largo plazo, etc.)• Sobre todo, más que tratar de ajustar todas las tuercas y tornillos, es necesario fortalecer las fuentes de renovación societal y ecológica, y la capacidad generalizada de responder al cambio, aún al inesperado.La globalización económica en combinación con el fin de la guerra fría y el potencial de la revolución tecnológica posibilitan un salto cualitativo en la historia de la civilización humana; esta promesa, sin embargo, no está siendo cumplida, y la marginalización creciente de las grandes masas de población en el Sur pero también en el Norte presagia un fututo muy conflictivo.Hoyes más claro que nunca que no existen soluciones separadas, una para el Norte y una para el Sur: o se logra una solución global, o no habrá ninguna solución .1. Esta apretada sintesis histórica está basada parcialmente en PNUMA et al 1990.2.La liberalización del comercio y el desarrollo de los acuerdos comerciales regionales han expandido el comercio mundial y, a través de él, la interdependencia económica global. El comercio de bienes y servicios ha crecido tremendamente, del 25 % del PBI global en 1970 a cerca del 45 % en 1990. El capital se ha hecho más móvil, con los ftujos de inversión privada a los paises en desarrollo saltando de 5 mil millones de dólares en 1970 a los 175 mil millones de hoy (UNDP 1996 p. 102).3.0tros análisis relevantes en cuanto a los supuestos subyacentes y las implicaciones ambientales y sociales aparecen en Runnalls y Cosbey 1992. y en el número especial de la revista Ecological Economics (Vol. 9. No.1. 1994). dedicado a Comercio y Ambiente.4. Nochteff (1987) presenta un lúcido análisis del origen. tendencias e impactos socioeconómicos comprobados y probables sobre América Latina de la presente \"revolución industrial\". Ese análisis se concentra sobre el llamado \"complejo electrónico\" (microelectrónica. informática. telecomunicaciones). que constituye el núcleo de esa revolución; sin embargo. sus conclusiones principales se pueden extender en gran parte a las otras nuevas tecnologias. las que comparten varias caracterlsticas importantes e interactúan sinérgicamente entre sI. Además, la biotecnologia. los nuevos materiales. y las nuevas fuentes de energla tenderán a estar subordinadas al sistema tecnológico centrado en la microelectrónica (Pérez 1986). En términos generales, el principal impacto directo de la microelectrónica se concentrará sobre los servicios y la industria manufacturera. mientras que el de la biotecnologla afectará mas directamente a la agricultura. la minería y el sector primario en general, al igual que a la industria química. En este sentido. el desarrollo de la biotecnología llena un vacío dejado por el complejo de tecnologlas de la información; ambas tecnologlas se complementan a varios niveles.5. Aunque los ftujos de inversiones privadas a los paises en desarrollo aumentaron de 5 mil millones a 173 mil millones entre 1970 y 1994, las tres cuartas partes se concentraron en sólo diez paises. principalmente en Asia y América Latina. Los demás paises. principalmente en Africa al sur del Sahara, han sido dejados atrás (UNDP 1996 p. 9).6. Esto es válido incluso para el caso de los paises de Europa del este y de la Comunidad de Estados Independientes; a pesar de sus dificultades actuales. su situación es mucho más sólida que la de los países en desarrollo y hay pocas dudas acerca de su capacidad de recuperación económica.7. Por ejemplo. uno de los argumentos de negociación podria estar dirigido a la apertura internacional del acceso a los nuevos desarrollos tecnológicos. para favorecer el cambio de los procesos de industrialización de los paises en desarrollo. como prerrequisito para reducir el impacto ecológico global asociado a continuar creciendo con el perfil de industrialización tradicional. El argumento tiene validez lógica. si se considera que son fundamentalmente los paises hoy desarrollados los que consumieron el potencial ecológico planetario. cuyo deterioro actual restringirla la posibilidad de crecimiento por la via tradicional para los paises del Tercer Mundo.8. Esta retroalimentación es esencial para la estabilidad de las interacciones ambiente-desarrollo (Gallopín 1980). 9. Esto se refiere a los desperdicios asociados al consumo. En cuanto a los desperdicios de la producción. estos podrlan eventualmente disminuir debido al aumento de eficiencia en uso de insumos posibilitado por las nuevas tecnologlas.10. Por el contrario, la producción de bienes básicos (siempre en relación al mercado interno) tiene un techo natural determinado por la satisfacción de las necesidades materiales fundamentales de la población.11. Lo que llevó a Celso Furtado a anticipar la posibilidad de un \"destino teleguiado\" para América Latina (Furtado 1984).12. Esto no es mera especulación. Las tecnologías de punta ya se han sumado a la lista de casos ya conocidos de experimentación de fármacos utilizando las poblaciones humanas de la región (métodos anticonceptivos experimentales, nuevas drogas, etc.). El Wistar Institute de los EE.UU., con fondos de organizaciones privadas (Laboratorio Rhone-Merieux, Laboratorio Transgene, Fundación Rockefe/ler) realizó en 1986 un experimento clandestino en instalaciones de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) en la localidad de Azul, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. El experimento consistió en la inoculación a bovinos de una nueva vacuna recombinante contra la rabia, obtenida por ingeniería genética. El mismo representó el primer ensayo en el mundo de esa vacuna en condiciones de campo. El experimento fue ocultado al gobierno argentino ya sus autoridades sanitarias, y, según denuncias públicas, los peones que manipulaban las vacas inoculadas y consumlan su leche sin pasteurizar, y la población de Azul (que la consumia comercializada y pasteurizada) no estaban informados. El experimento fué interrumpido por las autoridades sanitarias argentinas cuando su existencia se filtró públicamente. El caso provocó un escándalo en los EEUU (sintomáticamente, mucho menor en Argentina). Ver Revista Humor N' 186, 187, 190 Y 191, allos 1986/1987, Buenos Aires. 13.En un estudio de caso de la provincia argentina del Chaco (Gal/opln y Barrera, 1980) fue posible constatar la coexistencia de dos racionalidades económicas en el mismo espacio geográfico. La mayoria de los productores buscaban maximizar la tasa de beneficio (racionalidad capitalista); los productores de subsistencia, sin embargo, buscaban mantener constante la masa de ingresos familiar (racionalidad campesina), un fenómeno originalmente detectado por AV. Chayanov en Rusia (Chayanov, 1925). En consecuencia, los productores rurales capitalistas tienden a intensificar su explotación (aumentando el impacto ambiental) como respuesta al aumento de los precios de sus productos, y a disminuirla en caso contrario. Los productores de subsistencia (tanto 105 dedicados a la ganaderia como los ocupados con el cultivo del algodón) reaccionaban en forma inversa; es decir, aumentaban la explotación de la tierra (y su auto-explotación) al bajar los precios, tratando de mantener su masa de ingresos. De este modo, ambos tipos de productores tenían comportamientos opuestos, ambos perfectamente \"racionales\" en el marco de cada función objetivo.14. Incluso el análisis optimista de Pérez (1986), quien explicitamente enfatiza el sellalamiento de las nuevas oportunidades, se refiere principalmente a la posibilidad de apertura de nuevos espacios libres para empresas medianas y pequellas, al potencial técnico para el mejoramiento de la producción, las pOSibilidades de descentralización, de aparición de nuevos grados de libertad, el potencial de diversificación y adaptabilidad, etc. Pero todo eso en un espacio dominado por las empresas gigantes.También ella plantea la necesidad ineludible de nuevas estrategias de desarrollo para los paises de la región.15. Las inversiones directas necesarias relacionadas con el uso de tierras ascenderlan a menos de cuatro mil millones de dólares anuales por un perlado de cincuenta allos (Gallopin y Figura 3. Causalidades múltiples de los impactos ambientales del uso de la tierra en América Latina Tea'IOIoglas ~~-i~~ y tietTaS no \"'\"\"\"\"\"\"' ...... f----, ,\"\"\".,,,, ,, t 10' metros cúbicos de gas = 0.93 Tep; 10' Terawatt•horas = 0.3 x 30 años Tep.(1) Los recursos petroleros y gasíferos de China están sumados a los de la URSS.(2) Potencial técnicamente utilizable.Debe tenerse en cuenta que los datos de reservas y recursos adicionales de los paises en desarrollo implican probablemente importantes subestimaciones debidas al bajO nivel de exploración.Tabla 3. Agrupamiento de zonas de vida en Grandes Ambientes Latinoamericanos Ambientes Superficie Productividad Productividad .. En/asis en la diversificación de cultivos para el consumo inlerno y para exportación; secundariamente, en cultivos de exportación"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4259905414.json b/main/part_2/4259905414.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de39334b0bf001bdcdb9cc1282ff241441248baf --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4259905414.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"04a5a1215bedadcffe86bd96f64c1302","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5bb0336a-fd34-4bd8-aa69-daaa0b54f0a6/retrieve","id":"180967020"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"08ab1957-3913-439b-a811-85f17c1cad2c","content":"See document National Committee on food and nutrition security in Bénin where videos and Bioversity International are mentioned several times throughout the document. available at teamspace. 2018: Posters and dissemination workshops held at both community and district-level to build capacity on use of the tools were developed."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4270432679.json b/main/part_2/4270432679.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d71dda049883b10f0d29b6b66e738d6a0f3fc667 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4270432679.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"23182c977371d9a3d010d82ea189f16f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c99292e4-6e64-4502-8da7-0bdfb60362bc/retrieve","id":"-1393840500"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e0676c2e-8e16-4d42-8fd5-0631ed353857","content":"CCAFS, CIMMYT, Sonalika tractors, Tata Trusts and other partners have invested to promote Happy Seeder technology in 7 districts of north-west India. This technology contributes to increased yields and farmer profits, and conserves water and nutrients. It also reduces air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from on-farm activities.During 2019, the adoption of Happy Seeder technology was increased significantly with the adoption by more than 500.000 farmer households with a population of 2.5 million people and 1.3 million ha of land. Happy Seeder technology reaches over 500,000 farmer households with 1.3 million ha in north-west India MAIN PARTNERS THEMES Low Emissions Development, Climate-Smart Technologies and Practices GEOGRAPHIC FOCUS South Asia Photo: D. Vedachalam (CIMMYT)"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4293417608.json b/main/part_2/4293417608.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..98385302b77af83b7379c107712b396d4494cbde --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4293417608.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"781e554572c058f9e6878509eb3f8e97","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8aaa26a0-987a-43ef-9509-a3619485e0b7/retrieve","id":"1071867564"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2f32b9a7-2591-46fa-a696-b9aa2ea505df","content":"Published data on yields and prices was sought from reliable sources such as Government, MFarm, Kenya Growers' Association and KARI. The data were supplemented by ten Key Informant interviews.Series One of SSU was broadcast on Citizen Television between March and June 2012. It is estimated that the series attracted an audience of around 3 million television viewers, based on the Kenya Advertising Research Foundation (KARF) industry recognized data for measuring the size and profile of television audiences. The Series One pre and post broadcast research among small holder farmers with access to television, produced evidence that the series had a positive direct impact on the knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of the small holder farmers who viewed at least some of the programmes. There was no indication of the value of this impact.In order to answer some of these questions a further research study was commissioned by the Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund (AECF) in June 2013. This report is largely based on the findings from that study.The specific topics covered in this summary are soil fertility (for maize) and dairy cattle.• 36% SSU viewers claimed to have made a change in their farming practices as a result of watching SSU• Of those who claimed to make a change 26% improved their soil fertility and 18% changed their dairy cattle rearing practices 2. The farmers were asked to remember their yields and incomes before they made the changes, the cost of the changes and their yields and incomes after the changes.3. The overall sample size of 300 was small which has resulted in small bases for farmers who made changes in the four areas the study focused on.4. The researchers have used the principles of AECF's beneficiary model and have attempted to gross up the figures using a combination of population census data, KARF data and Series One post survey data.5. This document be treated as indicative and not as conclusive.Secondary data (See Secondary Data Research Compendium)1. Reliable, up to date secondary data on yields and prices in the three survey areas proved extremely difficult to source. There would appear to be an urgent need to produce and make available reliable, up to date and historical data by agricultural sector and by region. Such data as were sourced are re-produced in the Secondary Data Compendium, a sister document to this narrative report.The face to face survey instrument asked a series of introductory questions about sources of information used and valued for information about agriculture, the television programmes watched and the learnings derived from those programmes.• Of all those who claimed to watch SSU, two thirds said they watched both Series One and Series Two (65%). This finding is encouraging in that it suggests that the Series is attracting a loyal following and maintaining viewers at least over the first two series. Again, this is further evidence in support of the ability of television to produce enjoyable and engaging content which is is able to attract and maintain a strong body of loyal followers• Almost all the viewers (98%) who took part in the survey said that they had learnt something new from watching the series -ranging from dairy cattle rearing methods to building cow sheds and chicken houses and making silage. This underlines the value of providing 'farming practice' information to small holder farmers through the medium of television. It also supports the communication theory of 'uses and gratifications' -communication is effective when the viewer finds it both useful and satisfying.• There is positive evidence that viewers shared the information they learnt from the programme with other farmers (39%) and /or recommended the series to other farmers (35%). This word of mouth transference of information and personal recommendation plays an important part in 'knowledge transfer' and is a strong indication that there is a secondary audience for the information contained in the series as the primary target audience cascades information by word of mouth• Almost nine in ten viewers (87%) said that they adopted, at least, some of the practices demonstrated in the series. The remainder -almost one in ten (8%) said they 'adopted everything shown that was relevant' to them.• Three times as many SSU viewers (65%) as non-viewers (25%) said that television provided them with the most useful source of information to improve their farms and their incomes. All other sources of information (including radio) received low levels of endorsement for providing this type of useful information. th Floor Fedha Plaza Westlands Nairobi Kenya| 0721 206513• In terms of general farming, the key challenges that small holder farmers reported were the high cost of inputs; crop failures due to pests/ disease/ poor rainfall; cattle and poultry diseases and poor selling prices.• Underlining the subsistence nature of small holder farming in Kenya the farmers in this survey reported that, for the most part, most of their yields were not sold, but rather consumed. The exception was milk -where the bulk of the yield from rearing dairy cattle was sold.This section of the report focuses on the small holder farmers who participated in the inhome face to face survey and who said that they grew maize. They had all made changes to their soil fertility as a result of watching SSU. Presented in this section are general findings from the survey and a calculation of the estimated Development Benefit aggregating upwards from the estimates provided by the survey respondents to the larger population.• One third of the AECF sample of SSU viewers claimed to have improved their soil fertility as a result of watching SSU (n=81). After data cleaning and checking the sample eligible for analysis purposes is n= 74 • All of the different changes made incurred some costs and the reported median cost of all the changes combined was 2,750 Ksh. The highest proportion of the costs incurred were for those who mixed manure and fertilizer together at planting• As a result of improving soil fertility, just over 50% of maize farmers reported an overall increase in their yield -with a further four in ten reporting that 'it was too early to tell' • 90% of those who made changes to their soil fertility said that the changes had been 'worth it' with as many as two thirds saying 'very much worth it'. Further, 80% said that they would definitely continue to improve their soil fertility in the future.• 92% SSU viewers said that they shared the information they had learnt from the series about different methods of soil fertilization with other people. In the case of SSU viewers 69% shared the information with other farmers and 28% to other family members1. Median values have been used to take account of 'outlying' estimates as reported by small holder farmers and to minimise Standard Deviations 2. Incomes from TOTAL Maize yield have been estimated even though the majority of farmers do not sell very much of their yield. Own consumption is considered to be 'imputed' benefit (no household expenditure on having to buy Maize for consumption) 3. Average prices per bag have been held constant season over season at 3,000 ksh.Secondary research sources show slightly different season over season variation in prices and variability by region. However, the sample sizes upon which these calculations are based are too small to disaggregate at the regional level • Data derived from the self completion survey (663 completed returns from those who had sent for a leaflet) for Maize growers showed that 53% made a change to their soil fertility at a median cost of 5,000 Ksh (58.8 USD) and that their reported incremental income (season over season) from Maize was 7,000 Ksh (82.4 USD). This estimate is close to the incremental gain per household derived from the face to face survey of 70.6 USD.• The data estimate that if 'best practice is adopted in relation to the production of maize then the benefit is 55,910 Ksh (657 USD) per household/ per season. Data from the AECF survey of small holder farmers produced an estimate of 8% of the Maize producers who viewed SSU and who made changes -who adopted all the changes recommended in the series (as a proxy for 'best practice').Secondary data for Maize prices for the survey regions for the past three seasons is presented in Secondary Research Data Compendium. The most striking observation is the dearth of available data from all the sources contacted either online or in person th Floor Fedha Plaza Westlands Nairobi Kenya| 0721 206513This section of the report focuses on the small holder farmers who participated in the inhome face to face survey and who said that they had all made changes to the ways in which they rear dairy cattle as a result of watching SSU.• One third (35%) of the AECF sample of SSU viewers claimed to have improved their dairy cattle rearing methods as a result of watching SSU.• Two thirds of these dairy cattle farmers had Fresians; 40% had Ayrshires; 13% had Jersey cows and 11% had local breeds• In terms of the actual changes they had made -most (58%) said they were now using supplements/ mineral licks; 44% spoke of de-worming; 39% said they had built or adapted a zero grazing shed; 34% were feeding napier and 21% were spraying for ticks/ lice. One in ten or fewer said they had started zero grazing, made or used silage and /or used mastitis treatments• The changes had cost money -for supplements; de-worming treatments and for improvements to the zero grazing sheds • Almost all of the dairy farmers (90%) who watched SSU and who made changes said they had seen increases in their milk yields as a result of the changes they had made• 7 in 10 said they had shared the information they had learnt from the programmes with other farmers; 24% had shared with other family members Estimated Development Benefit (using AECF Beneficiary Model) -Assumptions 1. Median values have been used to take account of 'outlying' estimates as reported by small holder farmers and to minimise Standard Deviations 2. Incomes from TOTAL milk yield have been estimated and in this case the majority of dairy producers sell most of their yield. 3. Average prices per litre have been held constant season over season at 30 Ksh. • Data derived from the self completion sample indicated that 54% of respondents had made changes to their cattle rearing practices. Those who had made changes spent a median amount of 10,000 Ksh on the changes (117.6 USD) and derived monthly incremental revenue from their increased milk production of 5,000 Ksh (58.8 USD) per month.• This compares very favourably with the enumerator administered survey where the estimates of incremental milk yield per day (from the average 2 cows per farmer) was reported at 4.4 litres, at 30 Ksh per litre this works out at 132 Ksh per day, over a month this multiplies to 3960 Ksh (46.6 USD). As with the Maize farmers it would be expected that those who sent for a leaflet are likely to spend more on the changes they made and generate somewhat more incremental revenue per month, but the estimates of incremental incomes from both surveys are very close.SECTION 3: SYSTEMIC IMPACTTelevision, which is acknowledged to be a very powerful medium, can potentially reach a primary audience (conservative estimate) of around 3.4 million rural farmers. The data also show that there is a significant secondary audience for television information and advice through the 'ripple effect' generated by Word of Mouth. In all of the SSU surveys conducted to date, around 70% SSU viewers said that they passed on information from the programmes to other farmers or family. Multiplying this by the audience estimates for Series One would add around another 1.2 million rural farmers who in some way benefit from knowledge and information sharing generated by the television series.Apart from the evidence generated from survey data, 100,000 leaflets were requested from the SSU office and the self completion survey data suggests that each leaflet was passed on to at least one other farming household. Thus spreading the on-air information off-air and reaching a potentially larger target group.The series has generated considerable interest from television producers in Ethiopia, Tanzania, Namibia, Somalia, Sudan and Uganda who wish to make the series for their own audiences. Decisions on how and when to proceed are dependent upon funding.It has also stimulated production of similar series in Kenya: Mukulima on K24 which started broadcasting a few months ago and Equity Bank, together with a micro-finance institution is actively seeking to produce and broadcast a similar programme to SSUNot only is SSU influential through the traditional media of television and printed leaflets, it has spread and expanded its influence extensively through social media. The SSU Facebook pages are the biggest farming Facebook pages in Kenya. Facebook as recorded 12,295 'likes' and below is some Facebook dialogue and some example screen shotsGoogling SSU generates 27,000 reaults"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4296676216.json b/main/part_2/4296676216.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c56a153bffaea51444a326685583ffe2a9ece6 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4296676216.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4e6a31b4efc40f0a205f3a0d6c9ccb1f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c5fb5370-da5d-4bc4-9d5e-eb27736ec23f/retrieve","id":"-1958256333"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4e0f6b8d-d9f8-4f64-acff-d1666c1f8e82","content":"Tous droits réservés. Aucune reproduction de cet ouvrage, même partielle, quel que soit le procédé, impression, photocopie, microfilm ou autre, n'est autorisée sans la permission écrite de l'éditeur.La culture des champignons est très bien adaptée à l'agriculture durable et a plusieurs avantages : ? Elle réutilise les déchets agricoles ? Elle donne une production élevée par surface cultivée ? Après la récolte, le substrat utilisé fournit un excellent amendement du solCet Agrodok fournit des informations détaillées sur la culture de trois sortes de champignons : les pleurotes, les shitakes et les auriculaires.Ces espèces sont relativement faciles à cultiver à petite échelle. La culture des champignons de Paris et des volvaires asiatiques est très différente et sera donc traitée dans un autre Agrodok.La plupart des informations contenues dans ce manuel sont tirées de mon livre « Mushroom cultivation and appropriate technologies for commercial mushroom » (Culture des champignons et technologies appropriées à leur commercialisation). Nous nous sommes limités à trois espèces de champignons et à des technologies relativement simples dans l'espoir que les lecteurs obtiendront ainsi un bénéfice durable de la culture des champignons.Bram van Nieuwenhuijzen est l'ancien directeur du Mushroom Growers' Training Center (C Point) à Horst, aux Pays-Bas. Il joue actuellement un rôle de conseiller dans des projets de culture de champignons situés dans différents pays, par l'intermédiaire de PUM, Netherlands Senior Experts.Peter Oei Président de ECO Consult Foundation et professeur associé à l'Université agricole de FujianAvez-vous l'intention de vous lancer dans la culture des champignons ? Cette activité présente de nombreux avantages. Elle est intéressante du point de vue financier, les champignons sont faciles à cultiver et débordent de protéines, de vitamines B et de minéraux. Et ils ont même des propriétés médicinales. La cueillette se produit parfois trois semaines seulement après le lardage. De plus, le substrat utilisé après la culture est un bon fertilisant du sol.Cet Agrodok vous fournira des informations détaillées sur la culture des pleurotes, des shiitakes et des auriculaires. On peut faire pousser bien d'autres sortes de champignons. L'avantage des espèces choisies c'est qu'elles se cultivent facilement dans des pays en développement en utilisant la technologie appropriée.Avant de choisir votre méthode de culture vous devez vous poser les questions suivantes : D'autre part, certaines connaissances sont indispensables à la compréhension des principes de croissance et des propriétés des champignons. Le premier chapitre traitera donc de leur biologie. 2 Biologie des champignonsLes champignons appartiennent au règne des Fungi, un groupe qui se distingue nettement des végétaux, des animaux et des bactéries. Il leur manque la caractéristique principale des végétaux : la capacité d'utiliser directement l'énergie du soleil grâce à la chlorophylle. Ils doivent donc assurer leur alimentation à partir d'autres organismes, en absorbant les substances nutritives du matériau organique dans lequel ils vivent. L'organisme vivant des Fungi est un mycélium constitué d'un fin réseau de filaments appelés hyphes. Sous certaines conditions, les hyphes sexuellement compatibles fusionnent et forment des spores. Les structures les plus grandes (supérieures à 1 mm) produisant des spores sont appelées champignons. C'est la partie que l'on remarque le plus dans la nature, mais elle ne constitue qu'une fructification. La partie la plus importante se trouve sous le sol ou à l'intérieur du bois.Dans cet Agrodok, nous avons souvent utilisé les noms scientifiques parce qu'ils prêtent moins à confusion que les noms communs. Par exemple, le nom pleurote s'applique à plus de 20 espèces différentes qui se distinguent par la température exigée, la couleur et le rythme de croissance.Pour les producteurs de champignons, le plus simple en matière de taxinomie est de se fier aux taxinomistes. Il est conseillé de commander les variétés souhaitées à des institutions conservant des collections de culture ou à des producteurs de blanc renommés (consultez la liste des adresses utiles).Les champignons se nourrissent d'autres organismes. On distingue trois catégories selon le mode de vie : ? les saprophytes : exploitent la matière organique déjà morte.? les symbiotiques : vivent en une symbiose mutuellement bénéfique avec d'autres organismes (généralement des arbres). ? les parasites : vivent aux dépens d'autres organismes.Le mode de vie est indépendant de leur comestibilité : on trouve des champignons comestibles et toxiques dans ces trois catégories. Cet Agrodok ne traite que des champignons saprophytes.Les champignons saprophytes se nourrissent en dégradant les matières organiques en décomposition. En milieu naturel, ils poussent sur des feuilles mortes, des excréments d'animaux ou des souches de bois mort. Certains décomposent les poils des mammifères, tandis que d'autres exploitent les plumes d'oiseaux. Leur rôle dans la nature consiste à décomposer les structures organiques complexes issues de végétaux ou d'animaux et à les faire rejoindre les minéraux et les autres substances nutritives présentes dans le substrat. Les pleurotes dégradent le bois mort dans la nature ; on peut les cultiver sur une grande variété de déchets lignocellulosiques.Dans la nature, les champignons se multiplient en produisant des millions et des millions de spores. Lorsqu'un de ces spores atterrit dans un milieu favorable, il germe et se ramifie pour former un mycélium. Lorsque deux mycéliums compatibles sexuellement se rencontrent, ils fusionnent pour former ce qu'on appelle un mycélium secondaire capable de produire des fructifications.Dans la culture des champignons comestibles, on n'utilise pas les spores. Leur petite taille rend leur manipulation délicate et leurs caractéristiques génétiques risquent d'être différentes de celles de leurs parents. De plus, ils mettent un certain temps à germer alors que d'autres types de champignons, les moisissures vertes par exemple, germent et se propagent bien plus rapidement.Le champignon sélectionné doit pouvoir coloniser le substrat avant d'autres champignons ou bactéries. A cette fin, on mélange un mycélium cultivé préalablement (libre de tout contaminant) avec un substrat stérile, ce qui donne ce qu'on appelle le blanc Cette technique donne au champignon cultivé une longueur d'avance sur les autres Fungi.Comme dans la nature, le mycélium se propagera dans le substrat en utilisant les substances nutritives qui s'y trouvent. C'est ce qu'on appelle l'envahissement du blanc. Lorsque certaines d'entre elles sont épuisées ou si le temps change, le mycélium atteindra une phase différente, celle de la reproduction sexuelle.Figure 3 : Cycle de vie des champignons au blanc. On met en culture du tissu prélevé sur un champignon et on le dépose dans un substrat approprié. Une fois que celui-ci est complètement envahi, on l'utilise pour cultiver des champignons.Pour la plupart des espèces la température optimale pour l'envahissement du blanc est d'environ 25 °C. De plus, l'environnement peut stimuler la croissance du mycélium : une forte concentration de CO 2 lui est favorable (mais pas à la culture). Une fois qu'il a colonisé le substrat, le mycélium est en état de produire des fructifications dont le nombre et la qualité dépendront de l'environnement.Facteurs clés de l'apparition des fructifications : ? changement de température, ? taux élevé d'humidité, ? manque d'une substance nutritive, ? concentration de CO 2 dans l'air ambiant, ? lumière, ? choc physique.Ces facteurs diffèrent d'un champignon à l'autre. La plupart des changements qui stimulent la fructification ont un effet négatif sur la croissance végétative du mycélium. Il ne faudra donc les introduire que lorsque le mycélium aura complètement envahi le substrat. Ce sont en fait les conditions de croissance végétatives les moins favorables qui stimulent le mycélium à produire des fructifications.Deux exemples de méthodes permettant de provoquer la fructification d'espèces de champignons différentes : ? Certains pleurotes (par exemple la variété Pleurotus ostreatus) ont de fortes chances de produire des fructifications après un coup de froid (une différence de 5 à 10 °C) à la fin de la croissance mycélienne. Il faut également diminuer la concentration de CO 2 . Le mycélium peut se développer dans l'obscurité, mais la lumière est indispensable à la fructification. ? On fait tremper dans de l'eau pendant un jour ou deux des sacs de substrat entièrement envahi par un mycélium de Shiitake (Lentinula edodes). Le choc physique stimule la fructification en éliminant le CO 2 absorbé.Au début de la phase de reproduction, de petits primordia se formeront. Si les conditions sont favorables, ils se développeront en fructifications. Un flux constant d'humidité transporte des substances nutritives du mycélium aux fructifications. Pour que le flux continue, il faut que l'eau s'évapore à la surface des champignons. Ceci explique pourquoi l'arrosage de champignons en pleine maturation ou une humidité relative trop élevée risquent d'abîmer la récolte.Choisissez une variété donnant des fructifications à une température proche de celle de l'air extérieur. Le choix du site d'une ferme à champignons devra tenir compte des facteurs suivants : ? distance au marché, ? disponibilité de matériau de substrat de qualité, ? transport du produit et du matériau de substrat, ? accès direct à de l'eau propre. Avant de prévoir l'agencement de la ferme, il faut commencer par faire une liste des processus qui s'y dérouleront. La présence d'une chambre d'inoculation, par exemple, se justifie ou non, selon si le producteur a l'intention de préparer ses propres substrats ou de les acheter déjà inoculés. De plus, l'agencement de la ferme doit permettre :? un flux efficace de matériau de substrat, ? de prendre des mesures contre la contamination, ? une utilisation efficace de l'espace L'hygiène joue un grand rôle dans une ferme à champignons. Le contrôle chimique n'étant pas possible dans le cadre de la culture de champignons à petite échelle, l'hygiène et dans une certaine mesure la désinfection sont les seuls moyens permettant de lutter contre les parasites et les maladies. Ils doivent être appliqués non seulement dans la chambre de production de blanc, mais aussi dans celle où on produit le substrat, dans les chambres d'incubation et de croissance.C'est pourquoi le choix d'un lieu adéquat pour installer la ferme à champignons est de toute importance.Les environs de la ferme doivent être propres et exempts de sources possibles de contamination par des insectes, des moisissures etc. Il faut donc éviter de construire un nouveau bâtiment à proximité d'autres fermes à champignons. Les insectes et maladies se propageraient facilement d'une ferme à l'autre.Si possible, séparez les différentes unités de la nouvelle ferme.Il faut séparer le laboratoire de production de blanc des chambres de croissance. Les différents stages de cultures doivent également être isolés par des murs (en plastique). En fait, aucun processus d'incubation ou d'envahissement de blanc ne doit avoir lieu dans la pièce où l'on récolte les champignons.Il est de toute importance de retirer immédiatement des chambres et de la ferme les débris, les sacs contaminés et les substrats épuisés. Il est même préférable de les emporter au loin.Toutes ces mesures sont nécessaires pour éviter la présence à la fois des parasites apportés par les mouches ou d'autres insectes et les maladies issues de ces déchets. Si l'on veut réutiliser le substrat comme engrais pour le jardin, il faut le faire le plus rapidement possible.La semence de champignon (matériau de propagation) est généralement désignée sous le nom de blanc.Dans de nombreux pays en développement, la disponibilité de blanc de bonne qualité représente un facteur de limitation de la culture des champignons. L'importation est souvent entravée par la bureaucratie des services de douanes, les frais de transport élevés et la difficulté à garder le blanc à une basse température pendant le transport. C'est pourquoi le producteur sera peut-être contraint de produire son propre blanc.Si l'on peut obtenir du blanc de bonne qualité du champignon désiré à un prix raisonnable, il vaut mieux se concentrer sur les processus de croissance du champignon. Si ce n'est pas le cas, le producteur devra s'occuper lui-même de la production ou reproduction du blanc.Le processus complet de production de blanc consiste à préparer le milieu de culture, à remplir les éprouvettes ou les boîtes de Pétri et à les stériliser, puis à inoculer des récipients plus grands avec cette culture.La production de blanc nécessite un laboratoire désinfecté et des connaissances spécialisées.La production de blanc revient à mettre du mycélium du champignon désiré dans des substrats adéquats et stérilisés dans des conditions aseptiques.Mais, dans la pratique, ce processus n'est pas aussi simple qu'il en a l'air. Il faut maintenir dans des conditions strictes des souches appropriées du champignon désiré pour éviter leur dégénération. Lorsque c'est impossible, la production de blanc devrait se faire à partir de cultures de tissu d'un champignon frais et sain. De plus, la chambre de production de blanc doit toujours être méticuleusement propre pour éviter toute contamination. Les matières premières consistent en : ? des ingrédients pour la préparation du milieu ? du matériau du substrat (céréales, baguettes de bois, sciure de bois ou même fibre de noix de palme) ? des champignons sains de culture ou frais, d'une souche de l'espèce désirée ? récipients à blanc (flacons ou sacs en plastique)Dans les pays peu producteurs de champignons, on se procurera le blanc auprès d'une université ou d'un centre de recherche au début du projet. Vous trouverez des adresses de producteurs de blanc dans les Adresses Utiles.Les céréales, la sciure ou le compost contiennent un grand nombre de contaminants.Un seul grain de céréale peut héberger des milliers de bactéries, de moisissures et d'actinomycètes.Chacun de ses éléments, appelés contaminants, est capable d'infecter des substrats mal stérilisés ou inoculés dans des conditions d'hygiène insuffisantes.Un chauffage de 15 minutes à 121 °C suffit généralement à tuer tous les organismes. Il faut un certain temps pour que la vapeur chauffe le coeur des substrats à cette température. Cela dépend de la façon dont le récipient de stérilisation ou de pasteurisation a été rempli et de la capacité du brûleur.La plupart du temps, les sacs de substrat doivent être chauffer à la vapeur pendant au moins 6 heures pour que leur centre soit suffisamment exposé à la chaleur. Sterilisez les sacs de 4 litres avec 2 kg de substrat de blanc pendant au moins 2 heures a une temperature de 121°C.La solution la plus économique consiste à s'équiper d'un ou de plusieurs autocuiseurs. Choisir des autocuiseurs qui maintiennent la pression une fois la température finale atteinte. L'autocuiseur le plus simple laisse échapper de la vapeur lorsque la pression est trop élevée ; souvent la pression descend en dessous d'1 atmosphère de surpression, provoquant l'ébullition du milieu. C'est ce qu'il faut éviter car le résultat serait catastrophique sur les boîtes de Pétri ou les flacons d'agar.Les autocuiseurs doivent être munis d'un panier qui assurera une distribution de température plus égale à l'intérieur. La source de chaleur peut être externe (brûleurs de gaz, charbon, bois) ou intégrée (électrique). L'avantage des autocuiseurs comprenant des éléments de chauffage contrôlés par thermostat, c'est qu'ils permettent un contrôle précis de la température. De bonnes conditions de propreté sont indispensables à la production de blanc. En particulier, l'ouverture des récipients contenant le milieu stérilisé doit être effectuée dans des conditions aseptiques. L'air ambiant contient de nombreux contaminants susceptibles d'infecter facilement le milieu stérilisé. Il faut donc pratiquer les manipulations et la préparation des cultures (de tissu) dans des boîtes spéciales placées dans des chambres d'inoculation.L'intérieur de la chambre d'incubation doit être composé de matériaux non biodégradables et de surfaces lisses faciles à nettoyer. Les étagères doivent être conçues de sorte qu'on puisse facilement nettoyer le sol dessous. Elles sont habituellement en acier galvanisé ou en formica.Ces boîtes à inoculation toutes simples sont largement utilisées partout dans le monde. On les fabrique avec les matériaux locaux disponibles, ce qui les rend bon marché. La vitre à l'avant s'ouvre pour permettre de remplir la boîte de milieu stérilisé. On désinfecte l'intérieur en le nettoyant avec une solution d'eau de Javel à 10%, une solution de formol à 2%. ou de l'alcool éthylique à 70%.Prenez des précautions en utilisant ces produits chimiques. Certains sont toxiques et/ou risquent de provoquer des irritations au nez et aux yeux. Suivez bien les instructions pour éviter tout accident. Les premières étapes de la production de blanc s'effectuent dans des milieux de culture artificiels qui doivent contenir suffisamment de substances nutritives, par exemple des saccharides, et un agent solidifiant (agar ou gélatine). Le mycélium pousse sur la surface du milieu de culture et servira ensuite à inoculer de plus grandes quantités de substrats sur sciure ou sur céréales. Les cultures se feront dans des éprouvettes ou des boîtes de Pétri (ou des flacons de whisky plats).On peut également essayer de se procurer de petites quantités de culture mère de blanc de bonne qualité pour préparer le blanc final. Si aucune croissance ne se manifeste sur l'agar, vérifiez les points suivants : -Le champignon était sans doute trop vieux. Essayez avec un spécimen plus jeune.-Le scalpel n'était peut-être pas assez refroidi au moment du prélèvement et a transmis trop de chaleur au mycélium.Le mycélium doit être blanc et s'étendre en dehors du tissu. Si vous voyez apparaître du mycélium jaune, bleu, vert ou gris à d'autres endroits de la surface, ce sont des contaminants fongiques. Une croissance crémeuse et brillante est souvent le signe d'une contamination bactérienne.La plupart des espèces poussent sur les milieux suivants :Ingrédients : 200 g de pommes de terre coupées en dés, 20 g de poudre d'agar, 20 g de dextrose ou de sucre de canne blanc ordinaire, 1 litre d'eau.La recette précédente est utilisée couramment pour la conservation des cultures, mais pour leur multiplication, la recette suivante est plus économique et plus facile à préparer. On s'en sert pour la culture des pleurotes (Pleurotus) et des auriculaires (Auricularia) aux Philippines.Ingrédients : 200 g de son de riz, 1 litre d'eau, 20 g de gélatine. Faire bouillir le son de riz dans l'eau pendant environ 10 minutes. Filtrez, gardez le bouillon et faites fondre la gélatine, puis verser la préparation dans des flacons que vous stérilisez.Avant d'utiliser les éprouvettes contenant le milieu de culture, il faut les stériliser. Dans les laboratoires à petite échelle, on utilise couramment des autocuiseurs, mais les autoclaves conviennent tout aussi bien.? Versez de l'eau dans le récipient jusqu'au niveau du panier. ? Placez les flacons/éprouvettes dans le panier en les couvrant de plastique pour empêcher l'eau de mouiller les bouchons de cotton. ? Fermez bien le couvercle. ? Au début, laissez la soupape d'air ouverte pour permettre à l'air de s'échapper. Il faut attendre quelques minutes avant que l'eau boue et que la vapeur s'échappe. ? Fermez la soupape. Le manomètre indique la montée de la pression. ? Stérilisez sous pression de 20 à 30 minutes.Pour augmenter la superficie de la préparation, on incline les éprouvettes ou les flacons quand l'agar est encore liquide. Veillez à ce que l'agar n'entre pas en contact avec le bouchon de coton qui risquerait de le contaminer. Attendez que l'agar se soit solidifié pour déplacer ou manipuler les récipients pour éviter qu'une petite partie de l'agar ne se solidifie sur l'autre paroi ou trop près du bouchon. Il est conseillé de ne pas transférer le mycélium plus de huit fois ou sur une période de plus de deux ans sur de l'agar, pour éviter la dégénération.Le mycélium subit une dégénération au bout d'un certain nombre de transferts. Il n'est donc pas possible de continuer à transférer indéfiniment les cultures sur de l'agar.Le matériau des récipients destinés à contenir le blanc doit être résistant à la chaleur : on utilise le plus couramment du verre et du polypropylène (PP). Il faut vérifier s'ils supportent la température de l'intérieur des ustensiles de stérilisation. Si la pression est supérieure à 1 atmosphère de surpression, la température montera au-dessus de 121 ºC. Il arrive que les sacs en PP se fendillent après le processus de stérilisation. Évitez les sacs comportant une soudure : ils ont tendance à se déchirer après un traitement thermique. La culture mère de blanc peut servir à inoculer du blanc sur céréales ou une seconde génération de culture mère. Dans des laboratoires simples, il est déconseillé d'inoculer une autre génération de culture mère de blanc parce que le risque de contamination et de dégénération serait trop grand.Le principal avantage des céréales, c'est qu'ils sont très nourrissants pour les champignons et qu'ils forment des grains qu'on peut facilement disperser dans le substrat. Leur inconvénient majeur, c'est qu'ils fournissent également un substrat idéal pour d'autres organismes. Les risques de contamination sont donc bien plus élevés qu'avec du blanc cultivé sur de la sciure de bois.On utilise différentes sortes de céréales, par exemple le blé, le seigle, le riz ou le sorgho. Leur taux d'humidité doit avoisiner 50%. S'il est plus élevé, la croissance mycélienne sera peut-être plus rapide, mais le risque d'apparition de bacilles sera aussi plus grand. Si ce taux est inférieur à 35%, la croissance mycélienne se fera lentement. Faites d'abord bouillir les céréales, faites-les égoutter, puis mettez-les dans des récipients et stérilisez-les.On obtient un taux d'humidité supérieur dans de petits récipients que dans des sacs de 15 litres. Pour des récipients de 2 litres, la recette est la suivante : 480 g de seigle, de sorgho ou de blé, 400 ml d'eau, 2 g de gypse (45% d'humidité).Substrat du blanc sur sciure : sciure 10 kg, CaCo3 147,5 g, son de riz 1,25 kg, gypse 0,1475 g, urée 0,5 g, eau 1,5 l (voir Annexe 1).Stérilisez les récipients destinés au blanc dans un autocuiseur ou autoclave. La durée nécessaire dépend du type d'appareil, de la façon dont sont remplis les récipients (serré ou non) et de leur taille. Par exemple, deux heures pour des récipients de 500 g ; trois ou quatre pour des sacs de 3 kg.Secouez les flacons en les retirant de l'autocuiseur ou de l'autoclave.Elle peut avoir lieu une fois que la température du centre du récipient est tombée en dessous du maximum de celle de la croissance mycélienne. Utilisez au moins un (flacons de 250 ml) ou deux (flacons plus grands) carrés de 10 x 10 mm 2 de l'agar complètement envahi ou de la culture mère pour chaque flacon.Incubez les flacons jusqu'à ce que le mycélium ait envahi tout le substrat. La température doit avoisiner la température optimale de croissance mycélienne (consultez le tableau du chapitre Biologie des champignons).Secouez-les une fois (au bout de huit jours) ou deux fois pendant la période d'incubation (ou tous les deux ou trois jours), pour répartir régulièrement le mycélium et empêcher que les grains ne se collent les uns aux autres.La plupart des espèces mettront environ deux semaines à envahir complètement le substrat.Conservez le blanc au réfrigérateur (sauf celui de certaines souches de Pleurotus djamor qui sont très sensibles au froid et doivent être stockées à plus de 12 °C) et ne le sortez qu'au moment de son utilisation. Le blanc sur céréales risque de s'abîmer en une nuit à une température supérieure à 25 °C.Le choix du substrat pour le blanc se fera en fonction de l'espèce cultivée et de la méthode de culture. Le tableau suivant indique les substrats le plus fréquemment utilisés. La préparation du substrat nécessite essentiellement des barils à pétrole, des sacs en plastique et une fourche pour mélanger tous les ingrédients. Le sol sur lequel on mélangera et on humidifiera la sciure (ou la paille) sera de préférence en ciment.Équipement nécessaire : ? un mélangeur de substrat (optionnel). Le mélange des ingrédients peut également se faire à la main. ? une source de vapeur ou un équipement permettant de chauffer, un baril à pétrole par exemple.Pour le substrat : ? des matériaux de substrat tels que de la sciure, du son de riz, de la paille de blé, des feuilles de bananiers, de l'herbe à éléphant, de l'herbe sèche, etc. ? des récipients à substrat (des sacs en plastique ou des flacons), ? selon le type de sacs/de flacons : bouchons supplémentaires et manchons en plastique ou élastiques.On mélange les ingrédients et l'eau pour les répartir le plus régulièrement possible. Lorsqu'on ajoute un composant, de la craie par exemple, en petite quantité, il vaut mieux commencer par le mélanger avec un peu de substrat avant de l'ajouter à l'ensemble, sinon il ne serait pas réparti uniformément dans le substrat. Si certaines parties contiennent une concentration de substances nutritives très élevée, elles risquent d'être contaminées.Le fait de mélanger les ingrédients permet également une bonne répartition de l'humidité. Chaque partie du substrat doit disposer de la quantité d'eau nécessaire. Après le mélange, le taux d'humidité doit être de 60 -65%.On obtient parfois une meilleure répartition des ingrédients en les mélangeant à sec (par exemple, dans des substrats « stérilisés » contenant de la sciure et des compléments). On ajoute l'eau ensuite.. On peut mélanger à la main jusqu'à 2000 kilos à la fois, sur un sol cimenté, comme lorsqu'on fait du ciment. La capacité journalière de deux personnes est de 2 tonnes. Mais il leur faudra de l'aide pour le remplissage.Stérilisez le substrat le plus rapidement possible après avoir ajouté les suppléments. Il ne faut pas stocker le mélange plus de six heures pour éviter que le substrat ne fermente.On forme un tas avec la sciure (ou tout autre matériau de base) et on l'humidifie. La sciure s'amoliera, ce qui favorisera l'absorption de l'eau. On garde généralement la sciure en tas pendant un jour ou deux. Dans le cas où on ne peut se procurer que de la sciure fraîche, provenant par exemple d'arbres abattus récemment, on doit garder la sciure en tas pendant une période beaucoup plus longue, jusqu'à plusieurs semaines. Le substrat de sciure ne doit pas contenir d'échardes ou de gros morceaux de bois. Cela risquerait de déchirer les sacs et de fournir ainsi un accès facile aux contaminants, après la stérilisation. D'un autre côté, certains producteurs considèrent que le meilleur matériau de base est constitué par un mélange de sciure fine et de sciure plus grossière ou de copeaux. Il faut éviter d'utiliser de la sciure trop fine qui boucherait l'écoulement d'air, une fois humide.On humidifie les ingrédients coupés fins. On vérifie si le taux d'humidité du substrat est suffisant en le pressant. Immersion dans de l'eau chaude C'est une forme de pasteurisation. L'eau chaude va tuer les contaminants. On traite ainsi différents types de paille pour la culture des pleurotes (Pleurotus).Cette méthode est très simple : il suffit d'avoir de l'eau chaude, des récipients et du combustible pour maintenir l'eau à la bonne température.? matériau de substrat (voir les formules dans l'annexe2), ? récipients pour le substrat (par exemple sacs en plastique ou cuves), ? récipients pour l'eau chaude et source d'énergie permettant de maintenir l'eau à la bonne température (combustible, énergie solaire, vapeur, etc.), ? treillis métallique pour que le substrat puisse s'égoutter.On place le substrat sur un treillis métallique dans l'eau chaude qui doit être maintenue à 70 °C pendant au moins 15 minutes, et de préférence 30-60 minutes.Une immersion à une température plus basse et pendant une période plus courte est insuffisante pour tuer tous les contaminants.La taille des récipients d'eau dépend de l'envergure de l'opération. Un récipient de 240 litres peut contenir environ 90 kg de substrat de paille humide. Le temps d'immersion n'étant que d'environ 30 minutes à une heure, le répicient est réutilisable plusieurs fois par jour.On ne doit pas utiliser la même eau pour plus de deux ou trois fournées de substrat.Égouttage et refroidissement Égouttez le substrat traité et laissez-le refroidir dans une feuille en plastique propre sur une table ou sur le sol à l'intérieur de la ferme. Puis lardez comme décrit au paragraphe 5.2 Lardage du substrats pasteurisé.Elle tue les organismes indésirables tout en préservant les autres. Il faut maintenir une température de 60 à 70 ºC pendant au moins 8 heures. La plupart des parasites et des maladies seront éliminés à cette température.? matériau de substrat (voir les formules 4-6 dans l'annexe 2) ? récipients (sacs en plastique par exemple) ? baril à pétrole et brûleur Placez une grille à maille fine dans le baril à pétrole pour empêcher que la paille ne passe au travers. Remplissez d'eau jusqu'à une hauteur de 20 cm. Ajoutez ensuite la paille humide au-dessus de la grille et exposez-la à la vapeur pendant au moins 8 heures. Attendez que la paille ait refroidi en dessous de 30 °C avant de procéder au lardage.Utilisez le baril à pétrole comme indiqué. Veillez à ce que la vapeur puisse s'échapper à travers de petits orifices pour éviter que le baril n'explose.Cette méthode est également utilisée pour détruire les organismes indésirables. Mais elle doit être effectuée à une température beaucoup plus élevée que celle des deux autres méthodes, ce qui provoquera une montée progressive d'un certain niveau de surpression dans le baril ou autre récipient utilisé. Mais du fait de la simplicité de l'équipement, la température maximale ne dépassera pas 90 °C et la pression dans le récipient ne sera pas très élevée non plus. On obtiendra toutefois de bons résultats et un substrat stérile en prolongeant le chauffage à cette température.Pour éviter tout risque d'explosion, il faut vérifier que le couvercle du baril ou du récipient hermétique est bien muni d'une valve de sécurité.? matériau de substrat (voir les formules 1-3 dans l'annexe 2) ? récipients de substrat (par exemple les sacs en plastique) ? baril à pétrole (renforcé) ou récipient en métal. Assurez-vous que le matériel utilisé résiste aux températures utilisées.A des altitudes plus élevées l'eau bouillera en dessous de 100 °C et la durée de chauffage devra être prolongée.Le substrat doit avoir refroidi jusqu'à 30 °C (quíl ait été pasteurisé à la vapeur ou par immersion dans de l'eau chaude). On peut y mélanger le blanc (de 3 à 8% du poids du substrat) en remplissant les sacs ou déposer un peu de blanc entre les couches de substrat.On peut mettre le substrat dans différents types de sacs. Ne jamais dépasser 20 kg par sac : une fermentation spontanée ferait monter la température de l'intérieur des sacs à plus de 30 °C, limite supérieure de la croissance mycélienne de la plupart des espèces de pleurotes.En Chine, on utilise un type de sac constitué d'un cylindre en plastique de 20 cm de diamètre, rempli jusqu'à 50 cm de hauteur, et muni en son milieu d'un tuyau perforé par lequel s'effectue l'aération. Le tuyau permet également de faire baisser la chaleur même au coeur du substrat. Envahissement du blanc : à 25 °C le mycélium mettra 20 jours à coloniser le substrat. Dans un environnement très humide, par exemple dans un hangar, on peut enlever entièrement le plastique et le tuyau. Il est également possible de laisser le plastique sur le substrat, mais dans ce cas il faudra faire des entailles dans le plastique pour permettre aux champignons de pousser.Le substrat doit être lardé dès que sa température est en dessous de 30 °C. On utilise généralement des quantités relativement grandes de blanc : de 7 à 10% du volume total. Mais il arrive qu'une plus petite quantité donne le même résultat. ? Tenez le substrat et le blanc à l'horizontale pour empêcher que des spores ne tombent à l'intérieur. ? Utilisez une flamme près de l'ouverture des flacons de blanc et des sacs en plastique pour que l'environnement reste plus ou moins stérile. ? Procédez au lardage la nuit, lorsqu'il y a moins de contamination dans l'air. ? Nettoyez avec des produits chimiques : formol ou alcool.Évitez tout contact avec ces produits. Leur utilisation présente un risque pour la santé et l'environnement ; donnez la priorité aux mesures d'hygiène.La vaporisation avec du H 2 O 2 (eau oxygénée) permet de nettoyer une pièce avant le lardage, tout en respectant l'environnement puisque ce produit se transforme en oxygène et en eau.On utilise un simple baril á pétrole de la façon suivante : ? Placer une grille en bois à environ 20 cm du fond. ? Remplir le baril d'eau jusqu'à la hauteur de la grille. ? Déposez les sacs remplis de substrat sur la grille, à l'intérieur du baril. ? Posez le couvercle sur le baril et exposer à la vapeur de quatre à six heures en chauffant le baril avec du bois ou du gaz.Pratiquez quelques trous pour permettre à la vapeur de s'échapper. On peut ainsi traiter environ 75 sacs par fournée. Veillez à ajouter suffisamment d'eau et surveillez l'opération pour éviter que l'eau ne s'évapore entièrement. On utilise également des constructions relativement simples en forme de tente pour une semi stérilisation des sacs. Une exposition à la chaleur prolongée à environ 96-98 °C assurera une stérilisation suffisante du substrat. Il va de soi que le matériau utilisé doit supporter ces températures. On diminuera les coûts d'énergie en installant des panneaux isolants.Après le traitement, le substrat doit être stérile.Ce sont des récipients en acier à double paroi, en mesure de résister à une surpression d'1 atmosphère. Nous ne les traiterons pas dans cet Agrodok parce qu'ils représentent un investissement important.Pendant cette phase, le mycélium va envahir le substrat. La durée de ce processus est différent selon les espèces et dépend de la taille du sac, de la quantité de blanc, de la variété utilisée et de la température.Après avoir déposé du blanc dans les sacs, on les place sur des étagères dans les chambres d'incubation.Selon la variété et la température, le mycélium va coloniser le substrat en deux ou trois semaines et va commencer à former de petites fructifications.A ce moment-là, il faut soit changer les conditions de croissance, soit sortir les sacs de la chambre d'incubation pour les mettre dans la chambre de croissance.Puis on enlève les bouchons de coton et le plastique (ou une partie seulement) et on maintient un taux d'humidité très élevé : 90 á 95%.Si l'humidité relative est assez faible (et seulement dans ce cas), on laisse un peu de plastique sur les sacs, pour empêcher le substrat de se dessécher.Quand les fructifications ont atteint la taille d'1 cm, on fait légèrement baisser le taux d'humidité à 85% en faisant passer de l'air frais à travers la pièce.Plusieurs techniques sont utilisées pour remplir la chambre de croissance et préparer les sacs en vue de la fructification.Une pratique courante consiste à fabriquer des cadres de bambou ou de bois et d'y empiler les sacs en formant un mur de sacs en plastique.On ouvre les sacs dès que le mycélium les a complètement envahi. On enlève les bouchons de coton et on découpe une partie du plastique autour de l'ouverture. Faites attention de ne pas couper trop profondément, ce qui risquerait d'endommager le mycélium. Si l'on souhaite récolter des petits champignons, il faudra exposer une plus grande surface à l'air. Mais le substrat séchera plus rapidement. Il faut attendre trois à quatre jours avant que les premiers boutons de champignons se forment.Une autre méthode consiste à taillader les sachets, puis à les suspendre au plafond.La température ambiante doit convenir à la variété de champignons choisie. Il faut bien surveiller le taux d'humidité de tous les champignons pendant leur croissance. Maintenez un taux élevé (80 -90%) en vaporisant de l'eau plusieurs fois par jour.Il ne faut pas vaporiser directement de l'eau sur les champignons qui sont prêts à être cueillis. Lorsqu'ils sont trop humides, leur durée de conservation diminue énormément. Vous pourrez récolter les champignons au bout de cinq jours (si la température se situe entre 15 et 20º C) ou de deux ou trois jours (lorsque la température est plus élevée). Pour une seconde cueillette, comptez de cinq à neuf jours. Compte tenu de l'énorme variété de souches et de substrats existant, il est difficile d'indiquer les périodes de fructification. En général, on comptera sur une semaine environ pour la formation de nouveaux primordia, étant bien entendu que le délai dépendra en grande partie des conditions climatiques locales et du contrôle climatique dans les chambres de croissance. Pour cueillir les champignons, détachez-les du substrat en les tirant ou en les tordant avec précaution. Veillez à ne retirer qu'un minimum de substrat.Frotter plutôt que racler.Aux Philippines, certains éleveurs enlèvent le substrat en le raclant afin de le dégager de petits primordia non développés. Cette méthode risque d'infecter les primordia, qu'il faudra alors supprimer. En outre, le raclage du substrat entraîne un retard dans la formation de nouveaux primordia. Il vaut mieux frotter la surface des sacs de sciure pour enlever les petites fructifications mortes sans abîmer le mycélium.Tant que le mycélium sera blanc et ferme, on pourra poursuivre la récolte. Au total, on récoltera trois à quatre levées. Une fois que le substrat aura perdu sa fermeté et sa couleur, il faudra le sortir de la chambre de croissance.Ne jetez pas les déchets de substrat à proximité du site de culture ! Tout déchet sera évacué immédiatement et intégralement des zones de travail. Les parasites présents dans le substrat utilisé peuvent facilement se propager dans le substrat frais.La production de champignons varie selon les facteurs biologiques, les conditions de l'environnement ainsi que les maladies et parasites présents durant la culture. La production commerciale des pleurotes frais représente presque 20% du poids du substrat humide.Une fois récoltés, les champignons frais devront être vendus dans les meilleurs délais pour éviter une rapide détérioration. Si cela s'avère impossible, on pourra faire sécher les champignons dans une unité de séchage simple, pour les vendre plus tard. Reportez-vous au chapitre Traitement après récolte.Ahmedabad, Inde Du point de vue de l'hygiène, cette interruption saisonnière permet d'éviter l'invasion d'insectes nuisibles et l'éruption de maladies.Le substrat est fabriqué à partir de paille de blé qui pendant le battage a été hachée en petits morceaux. Une fois ce travail effectué, les bûches sont placées dans une chambre d'incubation que l'on ferme hermétiquement à l'aide de feuilles de plastique placées le long du plafond et des parois afin de maintenir une température constante de 30º C. Les bûches resteront dans la chambre d'incubation pendant 3 semaines environ.Lorsque les bûches sont envahies par le mycélium, elles sont placées sur les étagères de bambou dans la chambre de croissance. On retire la couverture de papier et le bouchon d'ouate pour aérer le tout et stimuler la croissance et la fructification.Elle atteint environ 26º C dans la journée dans la chambre d'incubation, avec un taux d'humidité de 90%.Les champignons mûrs sont cueillis. On les taille un peu avant de les vendre sur les marchés régionaux et/ou dans les supermarchés.En 1983, le professeur LIN Zhanxi de l'Université agricole de Fujian pris conscience du déclin rapide des forêts de Chine, dû à la demande importante de rondins pour la culture de shii-take ou d'autres champignons exotiques. Il commença à utiliser des herbes sauvages, de la bagasse, de la paille de riz et de maïs comme matériau de base pour le substrat des champignons. Les principaux avantages de la culture de shiitake en sac sont les suivants : ? Elle permet d'utiliser différentes sortes de déchets organiques.? La période totale de culture est de six mois alors qu'il faut compter de quatre à six ans pour la culture sur bille de bois.Les formules de substrat les plus courantes sont les suivantes : ? sciure, 3 à 4% de son de riz, 1% de farine de maïs ou de son de blé, 1% de CaCO 3 ? sciure, 10 à 25% de déchets de maïs, 1 à 2% de CaCO 3 La sciure fraîche issue d'arbres des genres Quercus, Betula, Castanopsis, Castanea, et Carpinus s'utilise sans fermentation antérieure. On peut également se servir de sciure d'autres arbres; à noter toutefois que la sciure contenant de la résine devra fermenter au préalable pendant plusieurs mois (empilez sur un tas humide pendant une semaine, retournez au bout d'une semaine, puis tous les mois pendant six mois au maximum).Une fois que la sciure est assez humide, on la mélangera avec les compléments et la craie. Mélangez d'abord la craie au son de riz, vous obtiendrez ainsi une répartition égale. Le taux d'humidité du substrat, qui se situe généralement entre 56 et 65% au moment de la préparation (appliquez le test de la pression) augmente pendant l'incubation ; on veillera à comparer les données exactes au repos (par exemple : il faut toujours mesurer avant la stérilisation). Certains rapports indiquent qu'une forte capacité de rétention d'eau du substrat, combinée à une bonne aération, donnera de meilleurs résultats. On a observé que l'addition de feuilles de thé au substrat mentionné ci-dessus améliore considérablement la production.Si le substrat est trop humide, l'écoulement d'air sera coupé et dans ce cas, même une longue période d'envahissement du blanc ne pourra pas vous procurer un substrat de bonne qualité. Si l'eau s'accumule au fond des sacs, c'est le signe que le substrat est trop mouillé.Utilisez les méthodes courantes pour le remplissage. A Taiwan, l'exposition à la vapeur à une température de 96 à 98 °C a donné de meilleurs résultats que la stérilisation sous pression à 121 °C ; les deux techniques sont toutefois parfaitement applicables. L'utilisation de la vapeur sous basse pression convient bien si l'on prévoit d'autres levées. Laissez assez d'espace entre les caisses et les sacs pour que la vapeur circule suffisamment. Prévoyez également une sortie d'air.Laissez refroidir les sacs et opérez le lardage le lendemain. 10 g de blanc de sciure suffiront pour un sac de 1,2 kg ; par conséquent, on comptera un flacon de 550 ml pour une cinquantaine de sacs. On vérifiera soigneusement la variété pour la culture sur sciure. Certaines baisses de production importantes sont dues au fait que les fabricants de blanc fournissaient de nouvelles variétés donnant de bons résultats sur billes de bois, mais dont le rendement était très faibles sur sciure.Certaines variétés donneront de bons résultats sur un substrat d'épi de maïs tandis que d'autres seront plus performantes sur un substrat de sciure.Prenez les précautions habituelles lors du lardage ; en cas de niveau de contamination extrême, prenez les mêmes mesures que pour la production de blanc. La contamination ne doit pas frapper plus de 5% des sacs.La colonisation du substrat et la maturation du mycélium prendront en tout de un à quatre mois, en fonction du type de blanc utilisé et de sa quantité (voir les études de cas). La pièce doit être un peu éclairée, au moins à la fin de l'envahissement du blanc précédant la fructification. Chez certains producteurs, les pièces réservées à l'envahissement du blanc sont plongées dans l'obscurité totale ; nous conseillons toutefois d'éclairer ces pièces à la lumière du jour, à la fin de l'envahissement du blanc. Bien des problèmes sont à éviter, à condition de prévoir un peu de lumière durant toutes les phases de croissance. La croissance mycélienne s'avère optimale pour toutes les variétés à une température de 25° C. Généralement, la température à l'intérieur des sacs dépasse de quelques degrés la température ambiante de la chambre. Il faudra même songer à un refroidissement extensif si la pièce contient une grande quantité de sacs.On distingue cinq phases de croissance mycélienne pour toutes les variétés de shiitakes. Le premier stade est celui de l'envahissement du blanc commun au règne des Fungi. Lorsque le substrat devient blanc, cela ne veut pas dire pour autant qu'il est prêt à fructifier. Il doit d'abord venir à maturité. On observe les phases suivantes : 1 L'envahissement mycélien : le blanc fera surgir des hyphes blancs qui produiront des enzymes, lesquelles décomposeront les substances complexes comme la cellulose, la lignine et l'hémicellulose en morceaux plus petits. Ces fragments seront consommés durant les phases suivantes de la croissance mycélienne. La colonisation de la totalité du substrat marque le passage au stade suivant.2 La formation d'une couche mycélienne : deux à quatre semaines après l'inoculation, une épaisse couche blanche mycélienne se développe à la surface du substrat. Plus le niveau de CO 2 est élevé, plus la couche s'épaissit. 3 La formation de boules mycéliennes : il s'agit de touffes de mycélium que la plupart des variétés forment à la surface. A un stade ultérieur, ces boules peuvent devenir des primordia, mais la plupart meurent prématurément. La formation de boules est favorisée par des variations de température ainsi que par un niveau de CO 2 élevé. Pour baisser le taux de CO 2 en cas de formation importante de boules, il suffira de faire une fente dans le plastique. A un stade ultérieur de la culture, les boules risquent de présenter un problème. Elles peuvent facilement être contaminées par les moisissures vertes. 4 La phase de la pigmentation : un peu d'aération sera nécessaire après la formation des boules. Le mycélium virera au brun rougeâtre. Toutefois, le substrat risque de trop sécher si on retire complètement le bouchon. 5 La phase du durcissement de la couche supérieure : retirez le plastique une fois que les sacs auront bruni partiellement (pour un tiers ou pour la moitié). La couche supérieure durcira petit à petit. L'extérieur du substrat doit être dur et l'intérieur plus tendre et plus humide. Le taux d'humidité du coeur du substrat peut atteindre 80%. Si l'extérieur est relativement humide, les contaminants pénètreront facilement dans le substrat. La peau dure et brunâtre a la même fonction que l'écorce d'une bille de bois : elle protège contre les contaminants et retient l'humidité dans le substrat. Il est donc important de contrôler les conditions climatiques si l'on veut obtenir une couverture mycélienne de l'épaisseur adéquate.Les facteurs qui favorisent la fructification des shiitakes sur des billes de bois sont également appliqués pour stimuler les levées dans les sacs en plastique. Il s'agit des éléments suivants : ? variation de la température, ? humidité élevée, ? trempage, ? suppression du CO 2 , ? chocs physiques. Les auriculaires (Auricularia spp.) sont souvent cultivés en Asie. La culture en sac de plastique se généralise de plus en plus, choix qui est dû à la rareté de bûches appropriées et à la facilité avec laquelle diverses variétés d'auriculaires poussent sur la sciure. On peut donc s'attendre à l'expansion de cette technologie dans un avenir proche.Il existe de nombreuses variétés d'Auricularia ; Auricularia polytricha, Auricularia fuscosuccinea et Auricularia auriculu-judea étant les espèces communément cultivées.L'espèce la plus propice à la culture dans les régions tropicales à température élevée est l' Auricularia polytricha.La formule du substrat de sciure est à peu près identique à celles du pleurote et du shiitake, mais la période d'humidification (fermentation) sera plus longue. La préparation des sacs est la même.Une fois remplis, les sacs sont passés à la vapeur selon la méthode appliquée pour les pleurotes et les shiitakes.On utilise généralement du blanc de sciure ; 10 ml suffiront pour un sac. La température conseillée pendant l'envahissement du blanc se situe entre 25 et 28º C. Le mycélium met environ quatre semaines à couvrir le substrat.7.4 Fructification.On pratique des entailles dans les sacs pour favoriser l'apparition des champignons. Manipulez les sacs avec précaution: la texture du substrat demeurera tendre, même après sa colonisation par le mycélium. Celui-ci se casse facilement. La chambre de croissance doit être faiblement éclairée. Vous pouvez compter sur trois ou quatre levées et vous récolterez entre 300 et 500 grammes par sacde 1,2 kg.L'Auricula-judae (Oreille de Judas) se vend mieux que l'A.polytrcha, qui est plus grand. Mais l'intervalle de températures qu'exige la culture de l'A. polytricha convient mieux aux Philippines. L'oreille de Judas pousse dans des régions plus fraîches.? sciure sèche (taux d'humidité 15-18%) 78 kg ? son de riz fin (1 ère catégorie) 21 kg ? CaCO31 kg Le son de riz sera passé au tamis de façon à pouvoir briser les plus gros morceaux en fines particules. Ils seraient sinon les premiers à être contaminés. Pesez les ingrédients du substrat et mélangez bien le Ca-CO3 avec le son de riz avant de les ajouter à la sciure. Versez lentement de l'eau pour obtenir un taux d'humidité de 65 à 75% (vérifiez en pressant).Entassez le substrat en forme de pyramides que vous recouvrirez de plastique pour maintenir l'humidité. Laissez fermenter pendant cinq jours en retournant le tas le troisième jour. Tamisez à travers une maille de 1,5 mm pour vous débarrasser des plus gros morceaux et brisez les mottes qui ont pu se former pendant la fermentation. Les gros morceaux risqueraient d'abîmer le plastique.Mettez un kilo environ dans un sachet de 12 x 30 cm. Fermez avec un manchon et un bouchon. Utilisez 500 ml de blanc pour 50 sacs. L'envahissement du blanc dure un mois environ à 25 -30º C. Disposez les sacs à plat et en rangées sur des étagères. La chambre de croissance (5 m de large, 12 m de long et 4 m de haut) peut contenir 2 640 sacs. Chaque niveau aura 55 sacs par couche ; on pourra placer quatre couches par niveau, soit 220 sacs. Quatre niveaux de 220 sacs chacun auront donc 880 sacs. Trois étagères contiendront par conséquent 2 640 sacs.La température de fructification optimale pour l'Auricularia polytricha se situe entre 23 et 28º C. Pour favoriser la formation de primordia, il faudra retirer les bouchons d'ouate des sacs et faire des trous au fond. Faites en sorte que la température ne dépasse pas les 30º C en arrosant les sacs et en ouvrant la porte de la chambre de croissance pendant la nuit. Les primordia se transforment en fructification en l'espace de sept à dix jours. Détachez les fructifications du substrat par simple torsion manuelle. Il ne doit plus rester aucune trace de pied.Fort appréciés des consommateurs, les champignons comestibles ne se conservent pas longtemps à l'état frais, une fois cueillis. L'homme a mis au point des méthodes de conservations décrites en majeure partie dans ce chapitre. Points abordés : ? les niveaux de qualité et la récolte, ? les modes d'emballage des champignons destinés aux marchés de produits frais, ? les modes de conservation pour consommation ultérieure.La cueillette aura lieu au moment où les champignons auront atteint leur rentabilité optimale. Les champignons à cueillir doivent être secs à la surface ; toute eau (arrosage ou pluie) tombant quelques heures avant la cueillette réduira la durée de conservation de la plupart des variétés de champignons de culture.Les cueilleurs détacheront avec précaution les champignons du substrat ou de la terre de gobetage ; il faut éviter à tout prix de déchirer des parties de mycélium. Le pied sera ensuite coupé à la hauteur voulue. Les champignons sont délicats ; il faudra donc les manipuler le moins possible.Pour s'assurer qu'ils ne soient manipulés qu'une fois (au moment de la cueillette), on pourra les disposer directement dans leur emballage de vente.Demandez aux cueilleurs de respecter strictement les règles suivantes : ? Les champignons poussant dans les lits ou chambres les plus récents seront toujours cueillis en premier.? Ne pas toucher aux fructifications malades (elles seront cueillies à la fin de la récolte et mises dans un sac à part ; le cueilleur prendra soin à la fin des travaux de désinfecter ses mains et ses vêtements).Les pleurotes se cueillent par pièce ou en groupes. Certains concepts de culture des pleurotes sont basés sur la cueillette en groupes (exemple : la culture des pleurotes sur flacons, une méthode japonaise). Les variétés Pleurotus ostreatus et Pleurotus cornucopiae se prêtent plus particulièrement à cette méthode de récolte. La cueillette et la vente de jeunes groupes de pleurotes présentent les avantages suivants : ? Les champignons se cueillent en grandes quantités pendant une courte période. ? Ils ont un bel aspect et conservent leur fraîcheur plus longtemps. ? Les acheteurs paient aussi les pieds.A signaler toutefois que les pleurotes sont souvent vendus en tant que champignons cueillis individuellement. La cueillette doit s'effectuer lorsque le bord extérieur des fructifications est encore enroulé vers l'intérieur et sur le point de se mettre en position horizontale. Ils se conserveront plus longtemps s'ils sont cueillis juste avant leur maturation. La longueur du pied sera déterminée en concertation avec l'acheteur.Coupez les pieds directement après la cueillette. Des débris accrochés aux pieds risquent de souiller les champignons.Détachez les fructifications du substrat par torsion manuelle, en prenant soin de ne laisser aucun morceau du pied dans le substrat.L'idéal est d'emballer les champignons destinés à être vendus frais sous un film plastique et de les mettre au frais aussitôt. Le film plastique est une bonne protection contre le dessèchement, à condition que la température de stockage demeure plus ou moins constante. Evitez d'exposer les champignons à des températures fluctuantes. Plus la température augmentera, plus les champignons perdront de leur eau. En cas de baisse de température, l'eau se condensera à l'intérieur de l'emballage et à la surface des champignons, ce qui accélèrera leur flétrissement.Pleurotus spp. : des expériences en régions tropicales ont démontré que la conservation des champignons préemballés dans des films de polyéthylène perforés à une température de 8 à 10 °C était une bonne méthode pour préserver la fraîcheur. Les champignons pourront être conservés de la sorte pendant quatre jours.Généralement, la saveur et la valeur nutritive des champignons frais sont meilleures que celles des champignons en conserve. Pourtant, il s'avère nécessaire de conserver les champignons lorsqu'on ne peut en vendre qu'une partie à l'état frais. Les techniques de conservation les plus courantes sont la mise en boîte, la saumure et le séchage. Ces méthodes de conservation ne conviennent pas de la même façon à toutes les variétés de champignons. Les pleurotes en conserve, par exemple, ont un goût très désagréable (à l'exception de Pleurotus cystidiosus et de Pleurotus abalonus). Mais dans certains cas, les traitements de conservation sont susceptibles de renforcer la saveur des champignons. C'est ainsi qu'une fois séchés, les pleurotes et les shiitakes obtiennent un parfum spécifique.Ce processus est bien plus simple à effectuer. Le séchage présente plusieurs avantages : c'est une méthode facile, rapide et sûre ; bien séchés, les champignons peuvent être conservés pendant longtemps. Dans le secteur des champignons de culture, ce type de conservation s'applique essentiellement aux shiitakes (Lentinula). Une fois séchés, ils acquièrent, tout comme les pleurotes (Pleurotus), plus de saveur. Mais le marché des pleurotes séchés est assez limité comparé à celui des shiitakes secs. Les auriculaires (Auricularia) peuvent également être séchés et sont souvent commercialisés sous cette forme.Veillez aux points suivants pendant le séchage : ? les champignons ne doivent pas se toucher, ? la circulation de l'air est essentielle : étalez les champignons sur une plaque de gril ou une grille métallique, ? le four de séchage doit se trouver dans un endroit bien aéré pour permettre un apport d'air frais sec et l'évacuation de l'air humide. On peut aussi se servir de sacs de cellophane recouverts de polymère qui sont imperméables et hermétiques. On pourra les sceller au fer chaud ou à l'aide d'un appareil à sceller (à condition d'avoir de l'électricité). Malheureusement, ce genre de plastique n'est pas toujours disponible et il n'est pas très solide.La meilleure option est le sac en plastique de qualité plus épaisse (polyéthylène, épaisseur 0,05 mm). Il se ferme parfaitement à l'aide d'une agrafe ou de bande cellophane.Annexe 1 : Formules Formules de milieux PDA : milieu d'extrait de pommes de terre, de dextrose et d'agar 200 g de pommes de terre coupées en dés ; 20 g de poudre d'agar ; 20 g de dextrose ou de sucre de canne blanc ordinaire ; 1 litre d'eau.Milieu à base de bouillon de son de riz 200 g de son de riz ; 1 litre d'eau ; 20 g de gélatine. Faire bouillir le son de riz dans l'eau pendant environ 10 minutes. Filtrez, gardez le bouillon et faites fondre la gélatine, puis verser la préparation dans des flacons que vous stérilisez.On obtient un taux d'humidité supérieur dans de petits récipients que dans des sacs de 15 litres. Pour des récipients de 2 litres, la recette est la suivante : 480 g de seigle, de sorgho ou de blé ; 400 ml d'eau ; 2 g de gypse (45% d'humidité).Substrat pour blanc sur sciure Sciure 10 kg ; CaCo3 147,5 g ; son de riz 1,25 g ; gypse 0,1475 g ; urée 0,5 g ; eau 1,5 l.Ouvrage The atlas of cultivated Pleurotus mushrooms, de J.T. Peng, et al. 1990. ISBN 957-9055-03-3. Description des paramètres de culture de 50 variétés différentes de pleurotes de la collection du CCRC à Taïwan.The edible fungi south of the Sahara, 1993, de J. Rammeloo et R. Walleyn. Étude sur le sujet. Scripta Botanica Belgica 5: 1-62.The poisonous and useful fungi of Africa south of the Sahara, 1994, de R. Walleyn et J. Rammeloo. Étude sur le sujet. Scripta Botanica Belgica 10: 1-56.Agar Substance extraite d'algues marines, utilisée pour solidifier les milieux de culture. On peut également se servir de gélatine (meilleur marché). On trouve de l'agar sous forme de barre ou de poudre.Conditions aseptiques : conditions stériles, sans organismes indésirables. Bactéries Micro-organismes qui risquent de contaminer les cultures et particulièrement le blanc sur céréales.Mycélium cultivé dans un milieu stérile, qui sert à la multiplication des champignons de culture.Mycélium du champignon cultivé dans un milieu stérile, qui sert à la multiplication.Une boîte ronde en verre ou en plastique munie d'un couvercle permettant d'observer la croissance de micro organismes. On la remplit en partie avec un milieu de culture stérile (ou on la stérilise après l'avoir remplie). On s'en sert beaucoup pour faire pousser le mycélium qui sera inoculé au blanc mère.Stade où les jeunes champignons sont encore complètement fermés.Un composant organique de bois, de la paille etc., qui se dégrade plus facilement que la lignine. C'est le matériau brut à partir duquel on fabrique du papier. Les déchets de coton contiennent de grandes quantités de cellulose. La sciure de bois contient de la cellulose, de l'hémicellulose et de la lignine."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4320341042.json b/main/part_2/4320341042.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af5a586139ef0504f2743104a9d9dd959105c9c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4320341042.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"de999c9faa7f08ba138282330070c2ab","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3e8d5f70-358d-4402-b247-97ba290514d6/retrieve","id":"871386040"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7debc19a-99c6-4b0b-b896-0016a705f114","content":"Brucella abortus, less frequently by B. melitensis, and occasionally by B. suis• Bovine brucellosis is characterized by one or more of the following signs: abortion, retained placenta, orchitis, epididymitis and, rarely, arthritis, with excretion of the organisms in uterine discharges and in milk (OIE, 2009) • Brucellosis, also known as \"undulant fever\", \"Mediterranean fever\" or \"Malta fever\" is a zoonosis and the infection is almost invariably transmitted by direct or indirect contact with infected animals or their products (WHO, 2006) Objective of study The informants listed rabies (40%), Avain Influenza (24.4%), Leptospirosis (8.9%), Tuberculosis (6.7%), Anthrax (6.7%), and Streptococcus suis (4.4%) as known zoonoses• The important problems for raising cattle in this areas are infertility • The knowledge and perception on brucellosis is very poor in the beef cattle small holders and villagers in the study areas• There are not the same perception between villagers and cattle holders• The disease experience of village has effect on villager's perception• Need further investigation to classify the causes of \"infertility\"• Rapid response necessary to control and prevent the disease• Would be the correct priority level of investment for brucellosis in beef cattle at the national level?• How different of Participatory Epidemiology disease investigation comparing with classical disease investigation and laboratory test of brucellosis on the same area?.Thank you for your attention • The SAT is a very useful test for the diagnosis of human brucellosis when it is performed with a standardized antigen preparation, and titres which can be expressed in International Units (IU) can be correlated well with clinical stages of infection• The milk ring test (MRT) is a simple and effective method, but can only be used with cow's milk. A drop of haematoxylin-stained antigen is mixed with a small volume of milk in a glass or plastic tube. If specific antibody is present in the milk it will bind to the antigen and rise with the cream to form a blue ring at the top of the column of milk."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4322100627.json b/main/part_2/4322100627.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ad4e0692a2f834503313493af8b6a159ed0a214 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4322100627.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"054765b7fc624fdc93b10ba377fa88e9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1b736271-65e9-41f8-8dbf-63036f95a47f/retrieve","id":"-1988677726"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b914cf38-3721-43e7-9618-fb18a64ba5c2","content":"Fair dealing and other rights are in no way affected by the above. The parts used must not misrepresent the meaning of the publication. ILRI would appreciate being sent a copy of any materials in which text, photos etc. have been used.Livestock production in the Northwest Highlands (NWH) of Vietnam, particularly in Son La Province, faces significant challenges. Limited knowledge and skills among farmers in livestock production practices, particularly in feed and feeding strategies, are major constraints that impede livestock productivity 1 . In the Livestock CRP project (Li-chan), farmers in four villages of Chieng Chung and Chieng Luong communes, Mai Son district, were trained on feeds and feeding regimes, however, the farmer's receptivity to knowledge was still limited due to the short project duration and other operational barriers. Acute winter (dry season) feed shortage, lack of high-quality forage varieties and limited capacity in animal nutrition techniques are pressing issues for livestock producers in the region. The reliance on traditional forage varieties, such as Napier grass, further constrains productivity, and this presents an opportunity for introducing and promoting improved forage varieties in the region.Improved animal nutrition is fundamental in ensuring livestock productivity and efficiency. Local stakeholders play a crucial role in this domain, and empowering these stakeholders with the knowledge and skills necessary for optimal animal nutrition is essential for sustainable agricultural practices and economic development. Therefore, training of trainers (ToT) with local extension staff and veterinary officers, and training of farmers (ToFs) with women and men farmers and farmer groups is crucial to enhance knowledge and skills on animal nutrition.The CGIAR Initiative on Sustainable Animal Productivity for Improved Livelihoods, Nutrition and Gender Inclusion (SAPLING) aims to transform the livestock value chains towards greater productivity, adaptation, equity, and sustainability in Son La Province in the NWH of Vietnam. This aligns with the local programs and development goals for the agriculture sector in the province. SAPLING focuses on testing and promoting locally adapted feed intervention strategies for cattle and pigs to address the feed challenges and enhance livestock performance in the region.In 2023, the Feeds and Forages component of SAPLING (work package 1 -Technologies and practices for sustainable livestock productivity) conducted a ToT course and four ToFs to impart practical knowledge on pigs and cattle feeds and nutrition in Mai Son District, with 114 participants (24 local staff and 90 farmers). To enable a wider reach of farmers, ensure strengthened local capacity in animal nutrition, and accelerate scaling of feeds and forages interventions, a follow-up in-depth ToT was organized in 2024 and lasted 3 days from 28-30 May 2024, with participants from Mai Son and Phu Yen districts. The main purpose of the training was to equip the trainers not only with the technical knowledge in cattle and pig nutrition, but also impart skills that can be effectively transferred to farmers in Son La Province.The 2024 ToT training took place at the Mai Son District Agriculture Service Center from 28-30 May 2024. All materials were prepared for the practical sessions including feed materials (rice straw, forage biomass, rice bran, maize meal, feed concentrates) and other materials needed (urea, probiotics, nylon bags, plastic containers) (Annex 2).Interactive and hand-on learning methods were applied during the ToT, by using PowerPoint presentations, posters and practical demonstrations. Participants were divided into three groups for the practical demonstrations. In the last day of the training course, participants were divided into two groups, where they practiced presenting on their own using posters and practical demonstrations. All participants could speak and understand Vietnamese, so no translation was needed during the trainings.The ToT was conducted from 28-30 May 2024 The following topics were covered in the training (full agenda in Annex 1): The ToT training successfully engaged all invited participants over the three-day program, resulting in a significant improvement in their knowledge and skills in animal nutrition and feed technologies for cattle and pigs. Participants showed high levels of engagement and enthusiasm throughout the sessions.The training covered essential topics such as feed processing (silage making, ureatreated rice straw, and feed fermentation), feeding regimes for different stages of cattle and pigs, and forage-based feeding strategies. These topics were delivered through PowerPoint presentations and interactive group discussions, followed by practical sessions where participants could apply the knowledge in real time.During the practical sessions, participants actively engaged in silage preparation, ureatreated rice straw production, feed mixing, and feed fermentation for pigs. They followed a 'learning by doing' approach, allowing them to confidently grasp and execute the techniques on their own. The trainees were evaluated through their participation in group discussions, practical exercises, and individual presentations. About 33% of the participants demonstrated a strong grasp of the material, delivering confident presentations and showing good communication skills. Another 50% performed well, while 17% displayed average teaching skills, largely due to a lack of prior experience in teaching despite a solid understanding of the technical material.The participants visited local forage demo farms showcasing both improved and local forage varieties, such as Green Elephant grass (VA06), Mulato II, Mombasa Guinea, and Ubon Stylo. This visit allowed the trainees to evaluate the performance of these forages and gain practical insights into integrating them into local farming systems.Following the ToT, SAPLING and the Mai Son District Agricultural Service Center organized 34 training of farmers (ToF) sessions from 11-22 June 2024, across nine communes. A total of 1,183 farmers participated (65.5% men, 34.5% women), representing primarily Thai and Hmong ethnic groups. These sessions extended the knowledge gained in the ToT to a broader farmer base, covering essential feed and nutrition practices for livestock management.The ToT program demonstrated success in building local capacity in animal nutrition, paving the way for the scaling-up of these interventions across Son La Province. However, to ensure long-term impact and sustainability, several key steps need to be taken:• Expand ToT programs: To achieve widespread adoption of improved livestock practices, it is recommended that the ToT program be expanded to other districts within Son La Province. Local staff at the commune, district, and provincial levels who were trained during the ToT sessions will play a vital role in this expansion, acting as lead trainers and knowledge transfer agents for farmers in their respective areas.• Strengthen follow-up support: Continuous engagement with ToT participants is essential to ensure the consistent application of the skills and knowledge acquired. Providing follow-up support and additional refresher courses will help reinforce their understanding and address any practical challenges they may face when transferring these skills to farmers.• Broader outreach through ToFs: The success of the initial ToF sessions highlights the need for further farmer training sessions, especially targeting underrepresented groups like women and ethnic minorities. Expanding ToF programs to additional communes and villages will ensure that more farmers benefit from improved feed and nutrition strategies, thereby enhancing livestock productivity and economic outcomes across the province.• Sustaining knowledge transfer: To maintain the momentum generated by the SAPLING project, it will be important to institutionalize these trainings within local agricultural services. By integrating animal nutrition and feed technology training into the regular programs of local extension and agricultural service centers, the project's interventions will continue to have an impact even after the SAPLING initiative concludes.With these next steps, the SAPLING initiative can ensure that the benefits of improved animal nutrition and feed technologies reach more livestock keepers, leading to enhanced livestock productivity and improved livelihoods across the Northwest Highlands of Vietnam. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4322682387.json b/main/part_2/4322682387.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2789fd0c442bd51f78868c2bed8a9c198e39246 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4322682387.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5666776f7da460d4f746781a55e595aa","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/bb3d136e-4ac8-4d52-9706-e44e897c081e/retrieve","id":"1186589805"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"fa4723dd-391d-419a-b2f5-71efbc840e71","content":"The aim of this two-pager 1 is to provide input for the OneCGIAR investment plan. Notably to identify key research challenges within the OneCGIAR impact areas, how these areas interact with Dutch policy priorities and how the challenges could be addressed / strengthened.Scaling of innovations does not only involve multiple actors and changes; it is also likely to affect multiple development outcomes and objectives. This multidimensionality poses challenges and introduces trade-offs, as -more often than not-outcomes may be positive in one domain (e.g. productivity, profit) but negative in others (e.g. biodiversity, gender equity). Even if such trade-offs are not very apparent (e.g. in case of a multi-purpose breeding efforts), the involvement of multiple actors (e.g. breeders, seed companies, distributors, farmers, processers) implies distributional issues and coordination and information challenges. There is scope to enhance feedback loops, learning and co-development in seed systems, value chains and innovation systems to ensure that research is responsive to societal demands, and that scaling potential is considered when research agendas are set.While 'scaling' can be considered instrumentally as a practice, activity or strategy that AR4D organisations and their partners need to develop, implement, manage and coordinate, 'scaling' is also a topic of scientific investigation that can be approached from several disciplines. A recent (2020) special issue on 'Science of Scaling' in Elsevier's Agricultural Systems journal suggests that there are a number of important knowledge gaps where insights from different disciplines are likely to be relevant: 1 How do technical, organisational, economic, institutional, behavioural, discursive and political dimensions of change co-evolve over time, and which type(s) of change provides leverage over others in processes of innovation and scaling for systems transformation? 2 What are the strengths and weaknesses of innovation and scaling models governed through the public sector, the private sector, or publicprivate partnership? Which models are most appropriate for different types of innovation in different socio-economic or political settings? 3 How can (un)intended positive and negative conse-quences of scaling and system transformation be anticipated and differentiated across dimensions, levels, and societal groups, and how can such trade-offs and synergies guide investments in responsible innovation and scaling processes and pathways? 4 What kinds of institutional governance arrangements (e.g., incentive systems, fund allocation, adaptive management) can enable international AR4D organisations to engage effectively with impactful innovation and scaling processes?The current OneCGIAR strategy devotes considerable attention to the Practice of Scaling in the more instrumental sense, especially in Science Groups / Action Areas working on genetic innovations & resilient agro-food systems.However, the science of scaling is less clearly embedded still, which poses risks for the quality and underpinning of responsible scaling efforts and the realization of impact.At the same time there is an active community within the CGIAR that is interested in approaching Scaling in a more systemic and interdisciplinary manner, and CGIAR donors demand the CGIAR to perform better in the area of innovation and scaling. It is important to ensure that the 'practice of scaling' becomes informed by the 'science of scaling' to increase its efficiency and effectiveness.Dutch research institutes are at the forefront and highly visible on the topic of scaling and innovation. They are well positioned to advance this topic together with the various scaling communities and taskforces, and link it successfully with: (a) system transformation -taking a more systemic and interdisciplinary perspective; and (b) gender and diversity -ensuring that the benefits and risks of scaling are equitably distributed.To address the challenges we propose to develop a large strategic research programme with the following features:• Involving several social science disciplines to understand different dimensions of scaling (e.g. economics, sociology, innovation studies, governance, communication science, etc.); • Pay attention to the distribution of benefits and risks associated with scaling across different categories of beneficiaries (e.g. along dimensions of gender, wealth, land-tenure, occupation, etc.); "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4328541457.json b/main/part_2/4328541457.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ea7a3ab30b401206630a9b39c30589317658f8e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4328541457.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e15e34b5a1d3145537702a71bb7f2e75","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fe749d68-cc9e-4af6-8c12-c0f0fdc15839/retrieve","id":"-537024763"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"db41fd9a-1bea-484c-b71f-f1d248195f8e","content":"In what ways does gender (roles and norms) influence stressor related coping strategies and the preferred cassava traits by men and women farmers/processors in the study area? Coping strategies adopted by men and women producers in response to conflict stressors Coping strategies adopted by men and women producers in response to climatic stressorsWe adjust to the climatic changes by knowing the time we will plant, the variety to plant since some plants are resistant to drought and can also mature within a shorter time.Diversified sources income like petty trading, traveled to town to engage in vocational activities such as carpentry, mechanics, and they left the troubled place for more peaceful areas, planting several crops, other than planting just one type of crop.Some men give out their daughters in hand for marriage for foodstuffs just to survive the crisis or people also sell their goods at a low price to earn an income.\" Coping strategies adopted by men and women VC actors Gendered and regional resilience capacity- Cassava Mitigates other staples \"That's the more reason why I have held on to cassava processing. When all the other crops have been exhausted but I have my own cassava. I even sold one basin of cassava and bought guinea corn and am using it for food now and then yesterday I sold about two basins so that I could give labourers to prepare land for me to plant millet so it's the cassava that has been holding me all year round\". KII-Cassava processor-Daudu, Benue state, woman"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4355428409.json b/main/part_2/4355428409.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42764c5e2a5cdfec2fe634d692687a1b72401b30 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4355428409.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0e233c9cd11b3364f29ea1139a893b7c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b9c49608-6092-435c-a7ba-13fc647f829a/retrieve","id":"1393302335"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"fbe8bff7-96a8-4991-94f6-c14c0dfc6854","content":"Project Title: P803 -9. Landscape Governance Description of the innovation: FTA and PIM research highlighted the socioeconomic benefits of 12 community forest concessions in the Maya Biosphere Reserve in Peten, Guatemala. These findings provided the National Council for Protected Areas, in charge of the concessions, with the evidence needed for revising the norms for forest concessions and renewing a first concession contract (Cooperative Carmelita). "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4358326759.json b/main/part_2/4358326759.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41a0b193c4f855f334ed76f766d3f5ba52a02c48 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4358326759.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"64141a868a6969fd4a8030eb7094c9cc","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f1eab4b6-ee99-48b6-86c3-16f32f4e7f43/retrieve","id":"2087691459"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"791a35e9-b9ae-40ad-b8db-7fd498a8d8de","content":"The aims of our work were: (i) to explore the diversity of a group of near-homozygous genotypes for iron, zinc and phytate content, (ii) to identify donor accessions for biofortification traits and (iii) to identify genome regions involved in determining iron, zinc and phytate seed content by means of Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS).Among Plant Genetic Resources for Agriculture, landraces are excellent genetic materials for developing new varieties. Due to their genetic diversity, these populations have maintained potentially useful alleles for increasing valuable traits in crops. A diet mostly relying on pulses as source of proteins could not guarantee a proper intake of mineral such as iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn). Indeed Fe and Zn deficiency can lead to serious medical conditions, especially in developing countries. In this context, biofortification is regarded as a sustainable and an effective approach to cope with such a form of malnutrition. Common bean, the most widely used pulse in the world, shows wide diversity regarding Fe and Zn seed content and of antinutritional compounds such as phytate (phytic acid, InsP6, and its derivatives, InsP5 and InsP4); the latter reduces absorption of trace-elements including the two above-mentioned minerals. Exploring the natural variability of these compounds in purposely developed collections is the first step towards biofortification of common bean.Plant Materials. A near-homozygous genotypes (i.e. pure lines) collection was developed starting from 179 common bean landraces and 13 cultivars using a Single-Seed Decent (SSD) approach for five generations. In 2017 the collection was multiplied in a nursery using a partially replicated randomised experimental design based on the replication of 7 different genotypes.Phenotyping. Seed samples were collected, hoven-dried and milled using Teflon capsules and zirconium oxide beads for subsequent seed minerals and total phytate analyses. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry was used to quantify Fe and Zn using an X-Supreme 8000 (Oxford Instrument). Total phytate were extracted and purified using anion-exchange chromatography and then quantified in duplicates by means of spectrophotometry, according to Latta and Eskin 1 . For each trait, Best Linear Unbiased Predictors were estimated.Genotyping. Genomic DNA was isolated from young leaf tissues. Genotyping was performed at IGATech (Udine, Italy) using a double digest Restriction-site Associated DNA sequencing approach (ddRAD-seq). Produced sequences were mapped against the common bean reference genome. Several quality control (QC) steps were used to filter the identified SNPs. SNPs characterized by missingness > 0.1, minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.05 and heterozygosity ≥ 0.02 were discarded.Association analyses were performed for Fe, Zn and total phytates using a mixed linear model, including corrections for population structure and relatedness, as implemented in TASSEL (v. 5.2). Food Chem. 28, 1313-1315(1980).The collection of near-homozygous genotypes developed in this study showed a high level of diversity for the seed nutrient related traits. The application of the ddRAD approach resulted in large and robust SNPs dataset with markers distributed over the 11 P. vulgaris chromosomes. Results of the GWAS analysis allowed the identification of a region significantly associated with seed zinc content (chromosome Pv01). Further investigation are needed to detect candidate genes for the observed association.The collection showed high level of diversity for the considered traits (Fig. 1, left). The concentration of Fe ranged between 38.4 and 93.7 ppm while Zn between 18.9 and 53.4 ppm. Phytate concentrations ranged from 4.8 to 19.9 mg/g, with an average of 12.0 mg/g. The average coefficient of variation (CV) between duplicates was 2.7% showing high level of method reproducibility.Genotyping. After QC control, the genotyping produced a dataset of 49,518 SNPs used to perform association analyses. Results of structure and cryptic relatedness analyses, carried out on a reduced dataset of 2,518 independent SNPs, showed the presence of two major groups consisting of genotypes characterized by different level of relatedness.A significant and meaningful association was found for zinc on chromosome 1 where five significant SNPs were identified spanning in an area of 42 Kbp. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4359740664.json b/main/part_2/4359740664.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c119fc3b6d0855666cefb384ae7572b4c6d9bdc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4359740664.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e8b2cb729049bc0a51e8646a50ac567f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/71f96bf0-5581-42cd-9362-417e3bd5bb5a/retrieve","id":"783145269"},"keywords":["Aluminum < Micronutrients","General Plant Nutrition","Rice < Crops","Environmental Stresses acid soil","aluminum","low ionic strength solution","low nutrients","rice"],"sieverID":"af912cd5-d63a-4c95-a5a3-82179c75105d","content":"Nutrient deficiencies are often an additional growth-limiting factor in tropical acid soils.There are many causes for the poor growth of plants in acid soils. The common and primary stress factors are: 1) H + toxicity/low pH, 2) Al and Mn toxicities, 3) deficiencies of essential nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Mo and B) (Rao, 2001;Rao et al., 1993). The major problems of these soils are the low content of cations, the toxicity of exchangeable Al and/or soluble Al, and low level of phosphorus and also low silicon availability due to long weathering (Okada and Fischer, 2001;Rao, 2001;Rao et al., 1993). Severals studies were conducted to identify major factors that influence plant growth in solution culture with or without Al in solution and on its related mechanisms (Ofei-Manu et al., 2001;Pavan et al., 1982;Pintro and Taylor, 2004). However, the number of studies that have simultaneously considered the two major factors (high Al and low nutrients) in tropical acid soils is limited (Wenzl et al., 2003). In high nutrient solutions, Al toxicity is alleviated by occurring physicochemical interaction between Al and other ions, the formation of non-toxic complexes with OH -, SO 4 2and precipitation of Al with high ionic strength solution (Blamey et al., 1983(Blamey et al., , 1991;;Wheeler and Edmeads, 1995). The ionic strength of soil solutions of Savanna varied 1.3-1.7 mM in unfertilized conditions, which further increased to 5.4-13.4 mM after fertilization (Wenzl et al., 2003). Wenzl et al. (2001) found that root growth of Brachiaria ruziziensis, relatively Al-sensitive grass, was reduced in a solution containing toxic concentrations of Al and low nutrients than B. decumbens. An inadequate supply of nutrients may be one of the main factors that contribute to poor persistence of B. ruziziensis in infertile acid soils (Rao et al., 1998). Al activities in a solution of tropical acid soil ranged from 2.26 to 196.5 µmol L -1 (Pintro et al., 1999). Blamey et al. (1991) high Al concentration at similar levels to those found in acid soils. Watanabe and Okada (2005) investigated the difference in Al tolerance between Indica and Japonica cultivars under low ionic strength condition. To the best of our knowledge, no comprehensive studies on the identification of the primary inhibitory factors for plant growth have been studiedexcept for the studies reported by Akhter et al. (2009a) and Khan et al. (2011) for sorghum and maize. The main objective of the present study was to determine differences among rice cultivars in their tolerance to Al, low nutrient stress and combined stress factors of Al and low nutriens by using low ionic strength nutrient solution that mimicks low fertility acid soils of the tropics. Rice is a major food crop in Bangladesh and identification of rice cultivars that are tolerant to low fertility acid soils in Bangladesh will contribute to improved food security and poverty alleviation.Indica type (Bangladeshi) rice seeds were collected from Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, Bangladesh. (with a photosynthetic photon flux density of 81 µmol m -2 s -1 ) and spread on nylon screen placed on a container filled with 9 L of tap water. Tap water contained 8.0, 2.92 and 1.95 mg L -1 of Ca, Mg and K, respectively. Temperature, light intensity and aeration were maintained as same throughout the experiment.Seedlings with roots of 3-4 cm in length were selected and treated with 0.2 mM CaCl 2 for 6 h (pH 4.9). After measuring root length of the longest root by a ruler, roots of the seedlings were transferred to 0.2 mM CaCl 2 (control treatment), and 20 µM AlCl 3 in 0.2 mM CaCl 2 (Al treatment), and treated for 24 h at pH 4.9 for short-term treatment. At least 10 seedlings in each of control or Al treatments were used for short-term screening experiment. Just after 24 h, root length of the longest root for each seedling was measured again.Elemental composition and pH in long-term culturing medium is shown in Table 1. All chemicals were purchased from Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., Japan. All seeds were soaked and spread on nylon screen for germination same as in short-term experiment. Just after sprouting, seedlings were transferred to the glasshouse for preculturing in tap water for 5 days.Seedlings with same size were selected and transplanted into the 40 L of low nutrient (LN) Wada and Seki (1994) (Fig. 1). Culture solutions just after daily pH adjustment were collected, filtered through membrane filter (0.2 µm in pore size), and P was measured. When necessary, P was added to maintain the recommended concentration in Table 1. P was measured colorimetrically by molybdenum blue method using spectrophotometer (U-2900, Hitachi, Japan) at 660 nm. Concentrations of each element were measured for confirmation by inductively coupled plasma atomic absorption spectrophotometer, ICP-AES (Liberty 220, Varian Australia Ptv. Ltd., Australia). The culture solutions were renewed weekly in first three weeks of culturing and every 5 d during the remaining days to maintain nutritional demand of the growing seedlings. Seedling replication was done 3 times whereas treatment replication was done twice. At harvest, 3 seedlings with similar sizes were selected, separated into shoots and roots, thoroughly washed, dried for 3 d at 70 o C in draft oven, and weighed.The stress tolerances of the respective crops were calculated as % relative growth with respect to the plant dry weight, i.e. Ltd., Australia).Mean value of Al tolerance under short-term treatment of simple nutrient solution for eight cultivars of rice was 43.3% (Fig. 2). Al tolerance was in the order of Rikuu-132, Kamenoo>Sasanishiki, BR41>>>Aikokuu, Rikuu-20, Domannaka, BR34. Under long-term conditions the whole plant average Al tolerance was 83% and 72% in AN and LN conditions, respectively (Fig. 3 A, B). Al stress in both nutritional conditions decreased the plant growth, Ca concentration in the shoot showed significant positive correlation with combined tolerance of shoot (R 2 = 0.507*) indicating the Ca in the shoot playing the most important role to ameliorate or minimize the effects of combined stress conditions (Fig. 5). However, in the absence of Al, shoot Ca level did not increase under LN conditions (Fig. 5).We initially screened 23 Bangladeshi (Indica type) and 6 Japanese (Japonica type) rice cultivars for Al tolerance and further screened 18 pedigree cultivars of one Japanese tolerant cultivar. Among these 47 rice cultivars, we selected 8 cultivars (Fig. 2) and investigated No correlations were found between short-term Al tolerance and the combined tolerance (R 2 = 0.09, r = 0.3) (Table 2). Although investigations based on similar short-term screening techniques have been reported (Akhter et al., 2009b;Khan et al., 2009a;2009b;Kobayashi et al., 2004), our results suggest that a short-term screening technique may not be practically Al-tolerant crop species whereas Al-sensitive sorghum did not show such relationship. ` Some of the nutritional characteristics of plants grown in the presence of Al have already been reported (Foy and Brown, 1964;Hãussler et al., 2006;Mariano and Keltjens, 2005). We propose that the plant nutritional characteristics linked to low-nutrient tolerance observed in the present investigation should be further evaluated as an important strategy for plant adaptation in tropical acid soils for both Al-tolerant plant species and Al-sensitive plant species under low-Al conditions. Aluminum tolerance and low-nutrient tolerance for plant production in these soils may vary depending on the plant nutritional characteristics that are related to Al tolerance and low-nutrient tolerance. The soluble Al concentration and nutrient status of these soils are also important factors to consider for evaluation. A short-term screening technique that can be applied to these soils should, alternatively, be established in the future. So far, investigations were carried out using only monocotyledonous species. The recommended plant nutritional characteristics required to cope with low-nutrients containing Al may be different between plant species, for example, for dicotyledonous plants. Further research is needed using other crops, such as grain legumes, root and tuber crops and other high value crops grown in tropical areas.This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research to T. Wagatsuma (No.18208008) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4362335005.json b/main/part_2/4362335005.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c767c1b9c32e0892e356fa56b43a452ed83609bd --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4362335005.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1c154ef92a28e01231cd8290251a5074","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3c1413da-4d62-4c2f-986c-03e26dec8526/retrieve","id":"-1434536859"},"keywords":["P608 -Activity 2","2","2: Establish protocols for survey of antimicrobial use and for monitoring AMR"],"sieverID":"6c39befb-c4a8-42ff-b4da-5efc1ef1f3c2","content":"Description of the innovation: AMUSE Livestock is a tool covering knowledge, attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial use in livestock production systems. It asks questions at household level about: numbers and species of animals; types, costs and doses of drugs used; and animal health actions/behaviours carried out by farmers."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4367087199.json b/main/part_2/4367087199.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92957d2c834f122814d32bb18756295484a263b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4367087199.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b0fefe4bfe56fc526b7a7f3843eb0c31","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d4aa7022-61d5-4c3d-a071-ce8269c0a14d/retrieve","id":"-572321441"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e3bc3340-d58f-4e86-b40c-7c3daa23517e","content":"y Within the approaches to sustainable cattle farming, supplementation with legumes is one of the effective alternatives to boost productivity, efficiency, and sustainability of the sector, which is mainly related to the greater capacity cattle systems with supplementation have to respond during periods of drought.y Economic evaluation shows that optimizing the conditions of the traditional production system with Bothriochloa pertusa (Colosuana) pastures and supplementing with the legume Canavalia brasiliensis contributes to improving the productivity indicators of the system, translating into higher benefits and a lower risk of economic loss.y The conducted trial involved a characteristic productive system in the Caribbean region and demonstrated how it can be improved with appropriate technical management and supplementation with legumes. These results can be shared with smallscale cattle farmers to initiate changes in traditional production systems.Without improvements, the existing cultivated land will not be able to meet the demand for food by the year 2050 anymore. Therefore, intensive cattle farming plays an indispensable role in global agricultural policy and food security (Mottet et al., 2017;Röös et al., 2017). The cattle sector is of significant importance to the rural economy of Colombia, contributing 1.3% to the national gross domestic product (GDP), 19.8% to the GDP of the agricultural sector, and 47.2% to the national livestock GDP (FEDEGAN, 2023). In the dry savannah of the Colombian Caribbean, the grass Bothriochloa pertusa (Colosuana) has been widely adopted in cattle systems (Cuadrado et al., 1996). However, its productivity and quality decrease during droughts. Empirical evidence indicates that supplementation with the legume Canavalia brasiliensis is an effective solution to this problem (Castro-Rincón et al., 2016;Mojica-Rodríguez, 2017). The objective of this document is to assess the profitability of improving the pasture conditions of the traditional Colosuana system and integrating supplementation with the legume C. brasiliensis.As reference technology, the traditional Colosuana grazing system with low investment in the pasture was considered. This grass is a perennial plant with a height of 50 cm before flowering and 90 cm at maturity (Cook et al., 2020). The improved technology involved optimizing pasture conditions and supplementation with C. brasiliensis. This material grows well in acidic and alkaline soils and is also used to restore soil structure due to its strong root system (Cook et al., 2020). It was provided at three fixed daily inclusion levels (IL) to the animals. In all IL levels, results superior to the traditional technology were observed. However, for the economic analysis in this document, the most successful case was selected, which is the IL of 1.5% dry matter (DM) of For the economic evaluation, we employed a discounted cash flow model, which consolidates investments and the difference between income and costs (Miranda, 2022). This yields a net cash flow per period for the traditional and improved scenarios. Using this data, profitability indicators such as Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) were calculated.Through their comparison, the more profitable technology is determined. Subsequently, a probabilistic analysis with Monte Carlo simulation was performed on the NPV using @Risk software. This allows for more robust estimates of the indicator, estimating the probability of economic loss, and identifying the factors that determine profitability. The cash flow model was projected for 8 years, based on the characteristics of the productive system.Table 1 compares the indicators of the traditional Colosuana grazing system with the improved system with pasture management and supplementation with C. brasiliensis hay (IL 1.5%). Both technologies are profitable, with a positive NPV and an IRR higher than the discount rate (6.9%). However, the indicators of the improved system are significantly superior. The NPV increases from US$2,994 to US$26,988, and the profitability, according to the IRR, increases by 8.9%. The analysis was projected for 8 hectares.The results of the Monte Carlo simulation can be observed in Table 2. With this technique, the more robust mean values of the NPV and IRR were obtained. The mean NPV increases from US$4,225 to US$25,115, and the average IRR grows by 7.2%.The CV decreases from 69.78 to 26.75. Therefore, the precision of the estimation increases. In the case of the riskTraditional IL 1.5% of economic loss, the probability decreases from 0.059 to 0.These findings are visualized in Figure 1, which depicts the probability distributions for the two scenarios.Figure 2 shows the variables that have the greatest influence on the NPV or profitability. Accordingly, milk productivity (MP) explains 77.6% and 73.4% of NPV in the traditional system and the IL of 1.5%, respectively. The second most relevant variable is the discount rate (DR), explaining 21.4% and 23.8%of the profitability indicator. In third place is the milk price ($ M) (US$/l), which has a very small influence, ranging from 0.8% to 2.5%.The profitability gains reported in our study for this type of The improvement in pasture management and supplementation with C. brasiliensis improved the productivity indicators of the traditional Colosuana system. Milk productivity and animal stocking rates increased. The positive productivity results were reflected in better economic performance of the system where both NPV and IRR increased significantly. Additionally, probabilistic analysis showed a reduction in the probability of economic loss. Such representative case studies for the region are important for disseminating improved feeding technologies and practices, promoting their adoption, and increasing the resilience, profitability, and sustainability of cattle production. Future research could delve deeper into the benefits of supplementation. Aspects of hygienic quality add value to the product, so their measurement could further pinpoint the impact of adopting new productive technologies. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4369326037.json b/main/part_2/4369326037.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5afc66de649a20724d25ab900ff852320402165e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4369326037.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"43bab9ea3787a51eeaab93a92405ca79","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/61f8082f-bd0b-4f3b-b307-3dd774f8d88f/content","id":"1154609108"},"keywords":["Cling film","Hue angle","Respiration rate","Firmness","Ascorbic acid"],"sieverID":"634ee9e0-d864-46c3-85de-8e6214c2c328","content":"Compact, medium size, white to creamy cauliflower curds were packed into different packaging techniques like i. without packaging (control); ii. packed in low density polyethylene (LDPE) bag with 1% perforation; iii. wrapped with polyethylene (PE) cling film and iv. newspaper (locally used). Half of each treatment was kept at (6±1°C and 50±5% RH) and the other half was kept at ambient conditions (25±3°C and 60±5% RH). LDPE bag or PE cling film has a great effect to retain firmness and reduce weight loss of cauliflower in both storage conditions. Respiration rate, rot incidence and changes of colour values (lightness and hue angle) was reduced significantly for the cauliflowers packed in LDPE bag or wrapped with PE cling film stored in a refrigerator than that of control (without packaging) and all packaging techniques stored at ambient condition throughout the storage period. Initially, acidity, TSS and ascorbic acid content were 0.26%, 4.7° Brix and 58.7 mg 100g -1 , respectively. Ascorbic acid content was reduced severely in the cauliflower stored in ambient conditions than that stored in a refrigerator. Cauliflower wrapped with PE cling film and packed in an LDPE bag (1% perforation) stored in a refrigerator (6±1°C and 50±5% RH) could retain white colour, good sensory quality, firm and fresh curds with minimum loss in weight, texture and disease incidence up to 18 days and 16 days, respectively.Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) is one of the most familiar vegetables all over the world. Its compact flower heads hold essential nutrients and numerous health benefiting phytonutrients that help to prevent overweight, diabetes and offer protection from prostate, ovarian, and cervical cancers. It is also a good source of different types of vitamins like B, C, E and K, dietary fibre and folic acid, omega 3 fatty acids, proteins, phosphorus, potassium, iron, magnesium and manganese (Florkiewicz et al., 2014). It is a member in the cruciferous or brassicaceae family of vegetables and has similar nutritional and phyto-chemistry profile as that of other brassica family veggies like broccoli and cabbage.High quality cauliflower heads are white to cream in colour, firm and compact. The curds should be free of mechanical damage, decay, browning, or yellowing, which can result from sun exposure. High respiration rate of cauliflower and its soft tissue make it highly perishable and it is not suited for long-term storage even at low temperature. Quality loss in fresh cauliflower includes yellowing of the curd, floret opening, loss of hardness, the development of an undesirable odour, off-flavours and the risk of microbial development (Licciardello et al., 2013;Zhan et al., 2014). To extend the shelf life of fresh produce without compromising nutritional quality, many methods have been proposed including low temperature, in modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), sanitizing, antibrowning dipping, edible coatings etc. (Albanese et al., 2007).Int. J. Agril. Res. Innov. Tech. 12(2): 155-163, December 2022 Physical preservative treatments such as MAP or vacuum packaging been developed in order to extend the shelf life of whole and FC products (Zhan et al., 2014). A large number of FC fruits and vegetables are stored and marketed in MAP in combination with chilled storage or other preservation procedures (Hodges and Toivonen, 2008). MAP refers to the technique of sealing actively respiring produce in polymeric film packages to modify the O2 and CO2 concentrations within the package atmosphere (Mir and Beaudry, 2016); those concentrations are reached by the natural interaction between the respiration rate of the product and the transfer of gases through the packaging material (Oliveira et al., 2015). One of the primary effects of MAP is a lower respiration rate, which reduces the rate of substrate depletion and oxidation reactions (Sothornvit and Kiatchanapaibul, 2009). Cantwell and Suslow (2009) reported that cauliflower heads and florets should be stored at 0°C and 95-98% RH to maintain its quality. At 0°C, the respiration rate of cauliflower florets slows down to ∼8 ml CO2 kg -1 h -1 compared to ∼42 ml CO2 kg -1 h -1 at 22°C (Cantwell and Suslow, 2009). Dependent on storage temperature and duration, if cauliflower is stored under RH conditions 98%; it favours the microbial activity and spoilage (Hardenburg et al.,. 1993). Individual shrink wrapping or cling wrapping, a form of modified atmosphere packaging is used to enhance the storage life and to maintain the harvest freshness of fruits and vegetables. The principal advantage of shrink wrapping are: reduced weight loss, minimized fruit deformation, reduced chilling injury and reduced decay by preventing secondary infection (Dhall et al., 2012). The effect of PE packing including cling wrapping on storage life and quality of cauliflower at 0°C and 2°C & 12°C have been studied by Dhall et al. (2010) and Raja et al. (2011), respectively. Controlled atmosphere storage (CAS) differs from MAP. They operate by controlling the temperature, gas composition, and humidity. Various gas composition methods used are; N2 generation, O2 control, and CO2 removal. Unfortunately, CAS systems for mixed produce loads are unrealistic and too costly to control. There variability in respiration rates and ethylene production create too high of a challenge to control and maintain (Lee et al., 1996). MAP can be more beneficial than CAS on extending the shelf life of fresh produce during distribution and handling (Lee et al., 1996). MAP uses barrier properties that are specifically chosen based on the respiration rate of the vegetables. It benefits can range from decreased ethylene production, reduced sensitivity to ethylene, and a delay in ripening (Lee et al., 1995). Berrang et al. (1990) studied the effect of cauliflower in CAS environment (18% O2, 3% CO2, and 79% N2) held at 4°C. Their results showed that the cauliflower had a smaller decrease in lightness (L) value compared to the control (Berrang et al., 1990). Browning was also observed in the control versus the controlled atmosphere samples, which is a result from the decline in the L value (Berrang et al., 1990). Unlike broccoli; cauliflower and carrots do not benefit from controlled atmosphere (Suslow et al., 2009). Injury of cauliflower occurs when the oxygen level is less than 2% or the carbon dioxide level is greater than 5% (Suslow and Cantwell, 2009).Hence in the present studies were attempted to see the feasibility of PE cling wrapping compared with other packing techniques of cauliflower for extension of storage life and maintaining quality at ambient condition (25±3°C and 60±5% RH) as well as in refrigerator (6±1°C and 50±5% RH).Compact, medium size, white to creamy white cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) was harvested from the field of a progressive farmer at Gazipur district. Harvesting was done with great care to prevent bruising to the highly sensitive turgid curds. The outer leaves of curds were removed leaving small leaves in each curd. Each cauliflower had an average weight of 1.1 to 1.3 kg. The curds were divided into 4 lots (each 60 curds) and some curds were separated to use for analysing initial physico-chemical characteristics. One lot was unpacked (control) and the other 3 lots were used for 3 packaging technique viz., low density polyethylene (LDPE) with 1% perforation, polyethylene (PE) cling film and newspaper (practiced locally). Half of the packets of each treatment were kept at normal refrigerator (6±1°C and 50±5% RH). Other half of each treatment was kept at ambient condition (25±3°C and 60±5% RH). At each storage interval the data on weight loss, respiration rate, firmness, instrumental colour, decay, ascorbic acid, titratable acidity and total soluble solids (TSS) content of cauliflower curds were recorded. The experiment was laid out in completely randomized block design with 3 replications.Respiration rate of cauliflower was assayed of each measurement interval during storage. Each fruit of all treatments were placed in 4000 ml airtight plastic containers equipped with septa and sealed for 2 h at ambient condition. After incubation, 1 ml of gas sample was withdrawn from headspace by a gas-light hypodermic syringe and analyzed using a gas analyzer (CO2/O2 gas analyzer, Quantek Instrument, Model No. 902D, USA). The percentage of CO2 evolved in the container gas was recorded. According to Nasrin et al. (2017) respiration rate Int. J. Agril. Res. Innov. Tech. 12(2): 155-163, December 2022 was calculated based on the total gas volume in the jar, fruit surface volume, fruit weight and incubation time and expressed as ml kg -1 h -1 of CO2 evolved.Firmness analysis was performed using Fruit Texture Analyzer (GUSS, Model No. GS25, SA). Firmness measurement was taken as the maximum penetration force reached during the tissue breakage and determined with 8 mm diameter stainless steel flathead probe, which penetrates in a normal direction at a cross-head speed of 5 mm s -1 . After establishing zero-force contact between the probe and the horizontally positioned fruit, specimens were compressed 3 mm at 2 equidistant points along with the equatorial region of each fruit. The maximum penetration force (N) was used as firmness value of cauliflower pieces (Nasrin et al., 2018a).External colour of fruit was evaluated with a Chroma Meter (Model CR-400, Minolta Corp., Japan). CIE L*a*b* coordinates were recorded using D65 illuminants and a 10° standard observer as a reference system. L* is lightness, a* (-greenness to +redness) and b* (-blueness to +yellowness) are the chromaticity coordinates. The a* and b* values were converted to chroma [C = (a* 2 + b* 2 ) 1/2 ] and hue angle [h° = tan -1 (b*/a*)]. Before measurement, the equipment was calibrated against a standard white tile. Ten readings were taken at different locations on each fruit. The readings were taken at the same position of each sample (Nasrin et al., 2018b).Cauliflowers were weighed at the beginning of the experiment and thereafter 2 day's intervals during the storage period. It was calculated by the weight difference between initial and specific time interval divided by initial weight and finally denoted by percentage.After all physical analysis, cauliflower was cut into small pieces and homogenised in a grinder to assess the parameters. The ascorbic acid content was determined by using 2, 6-dichlorophenol indophenol titration method as described in AOAC (1994). Ten (10) g of ground sample was suspended in 100 ml of distilled water and then filtered. To determine titratable acidity, sample was titrated with 0.1 M NaOH and pH 8.1 according to AOAC (1994) and expressed as percentage of citric acid.The TSS content of cauliflower was determined by using a refractometer. Homogenous sample was prepared by blending the fruit flesh. A few drops were taken on prism of the refractometer and direct reading will be taken by reading the scale in meter as described in AOAC (1994).Cauliflower decay rating scale was used as used in UV Davis; California provided the sample picture of decayed cauliflower. The scale rated from 1 to 5, 1 = none (no scratch or even rubbing symptom), 2 = Slight decay (slight scratch or rubbing symptom, no black spot), 3 = moderate decay (initiation of black spots, 2-3 numbers), 4 = moderate severe decay (5-6 numbers of black spots with small area) and 5 = severe decay (8-10 numbers of black spots with small area). Decay rating of 5 was considered as the limit for saleability.Data were analysed for analysis of variance using MSTAT-C programme. Means were separated using Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT).Fig. 1 illustrates the effect of different packaging technique and temperatures on the CO2 production of cauliflower. Initial respiration rate of cauliflower was 49.46 CO2 ml kg -1 h -1 and it was reduced to less than even half when curd was stored at 6±1°C (both packed or unpacked) at 3 th days of storage period. The unpacked samples presented higher respiration rate during storage time compared with packed ones at both ambient and refrigeration temperature. The lowest respiration rate was observed in cauliflowers wrapped with PE cling film or packed into 1% perforated LDPE bag at both temperatures throughout the storage period. The explanation for the observed results is the gas barrier between cauliflower tissue and the environment, promoted by PE packaging that modifies the atmosphere around the fruit and so reduces its respiration rate. The intensity of change in the respiration rate of fruits and vegetables depends on the packaging techniques and on the storage conditions of the products. Suslow and Cantwell (1998) reported that the respiration rate of fresh cauliflower was 43-48 CO2 ml kg -1 h -1 at 25°C. At 20 th day of storage respiration rate was 149.47 ml kg -1 h -1 in unpacked fresh cut cauliflower where as it was 80.57 ml kg -1 h -1 in vacuum packed and around 100 ml kg -1 h -1 in 1% perforated LDPE packed fresh cut cauliflower (Nasrin et al., 2022). The respiration rate of fresh cut cauliflower was significantly higher than that of the uncut cauliflower and was within the range of 238.5 and 157.5 mg kg -1 h -1 at 15 °C; 120 and 77.5 mg kg -1 h -1 at 5 °C and 66 and 44.4 mg kg -1 h -1 at 1 °C for fresh cut and uncut cauliflower (Mashabela et al., 2018). Firmness or texture is a critical quality attribute in the consumer acceptability of fresh fruit and vegetables. Degradation of insoluble protopectin to the more soluble pectic acid and pectin contribute to a decrease of firmness in fresh fruits and vegetables (Nasrin et al., 2020). Cauliflower suffers a rapid loss of firmness during storage period, which contributes greatly to its short postharvest life and susceptibility to fungal contamination. Fruit texture properties are affected by cell turgidity and the structure and composition of the cell wall polysaccharides. Fruit weight loss is mainly associated with respiration and moisture evaporation through the skin. As cauliflower curd has no peel makes them susceptible to rapid water loss, resulting in shrivelling and deterioration. The rate at which water is lost depends on the water pressure gradient between the fruit tissue and the surrounding atmosphere, and the storage temperature. Low vapour pressure differences between the fruit and its surroundings and low temperature are recommended for the storage of cauliflower. Dehydration will also cause increase in surface-wounding in curd. Wrapping or packaging of curd act as barriers, thereby restricting water transfer and protecting fruit skin from mechanical injuries, as well as sealing small wounds and thus delaying dehydration. Fig. 3 shows weight loss during storage (at 6±1°C and 25±3°C temperature) of different packed cauliflower. All samples demonstrated a gradual loss of weight during storage. Throughout storage, the loss of weight of unpacked fruits was significantly greater than that of packed fruits. At the 6 th day, stored at ambient condition, control, curd packed in LDPE bag and wrapped with PE cling film showed 18.90%, 3.39% and 1.09% weight loss, respectively. So, it can be said that LDPE or PE cling film has a great effect to reduce weight loss of fresh produce. Similar results were also found by Dhall et al. (2010) that cauliflower packed with cling film and LDPE bag stored at 0°C temperature lost 2.4% and 2.1% weight at 28 days of storage period. The reduction in weight loss wrapped with cling film and packed in LDPE bag may be due to creation of micro-atmosphere inside the wrap or bag which reduced the transpiration losses and respiration rate as the film is differently permeable to O2 and CO2 transmission.Colour is an important factor in the perception of cauliflower curd quality. Fig. 4 a&b illustrates the changes in surface colour in terms of lightness (L*) and hue angle of cauliflower stored at refrigerator (6±1°C) and ambient condition (25±3°C) packed with different packaging technique. The L* parameter is an indicator of curd darkening. As can be observed in Fig. 4a, the range of lightness was 72 to 87 and all the samples showed decreasing L* values with storage time. Unpacked curds were significantly darker than packed ones throughout the storage period. At 6 th day of storage period, L* had decreased by around 18% for control (without packaging) curds stored at ambient condition and by around 14.00%, 11.05% and 8.09% for curds packed with newspaper, 1% perforated LDPE bag and PE cling film wrap, respectively stored at refrigerator (6±1°C). Storage period (days)The hue angle of cauliflower displayed a decreasing trend in all treatments with storage period but the more decreasing tendency was found in cauliflower stored at ambient condition than that stored at refrigerator. On the other hand, cauliflower packed in LDPE bag and wrapped with cling film preserves their original colour than unpacked or wrapped with newspaper one (Fig. 4b). The hue value range for fresh cauliflower was between, 94 to 101, which indicates the yellow region of the colour axis. The lower the number the more yellow, it is indicating a deterioration of cauliflower colour. At 6 th day of storage period, hue angle had decreased by around 6.35% for control curd stored at ambient condition and by around 3.95%, 2.16% and 1.84% for fruit packed with newspaper, 1% perforated LDPE bag and PE cling film respectively stored at refrigerator (6±1°C). Spokowski (2010) found the similar results that the range of lightness and hue angle for vacuum packed cauliflower was from 82 to 84 and 94° to 98° during the storage at 3° and 7°C temperature and both values were decreased with increasing storage period. Decay is an important source of postharvest losses of cauliflower, particularly in combination with rough handling and poor temperature control. A large list of bacterial and fungal pathogens causes postharvest losses in transit, storage, and to the consumer. Bacterial Soft-Rot (Erwinia and Pseudomonas), Black Spot (Alternaria alternata), Grey Mold (Botrytis cinerea), and Cladosporium Rot are common disorders. The causal pathogens of diseases that appeared on the cauliflower in this study were Alternaria spp., Botrytis spp. and Erwinia spp.The incidence of rot started on 2 nd day in control (without packaging) curds wrapped with newspaper at ambient storage as shown in Fig. 5. Cauliflower wrapped with newspaper, PE cling film and packed in 1% perforated LDPE bag secured 3.33, 1.67 and 2.33 decay score respectively at 14 th day of storage at refrigerator (6±1°C). More water was accumulated inside LDPE bag and curd was suffered from rubbing in LDPE bag than that of cling film. That why more spots were created on curds packed in 1% perforated LDPE bag than that of PE cling wrapped curds. Browning or black spots can be due to bruises and pressure points. Later the affected points turn dark brown to black. When the symptoms are in progress, a fungal attack is seen. Dhall et al. (2010) found more fungal decay in cling film wrapped cauliflowers than that packed with LDPE bag stored at 0°C temperature and 95% RH at 28 days of storage period. Which may be due to the high relative humidity within the packaging (Ceponis et al., 1987). Initial ascorbic acid in cauliflower was 58.7 mg/100g. At 6 th day of storage, ascorbic acid content reduced severely in the cauliflower stored in ambient condition than that stored at refrigerator. Cauliflower packed in LDPE bag or wrapped with cling film preserved more ascorbic acid than cauliflower wrapped with newspaper and control (without packaging) in both temperatures. Initial acidity and TSS is 0.26 % and 4.9° Brix respectively. At 6 th day of storage, acidity increased slightly and TSS increased moderately ranged from 4.8° to 5.6° Brix. Maximum TSS was found in control cauliflower as maximum water loss was occurred here.Control cauliflower stored at ambient condition was good up to 3 days whereas, cauliflower packed in LDPE bag and wrapped with cling film stored at refrigerator preserved their quality up to 16 and 18 days respectively. Initially, acidity, TSS and ascorbic acid content was 0.15%, 7.7° Brix and 62.97 mg 100g -1 , respectively in cauliflower was found by Raja et al. (2011). He also found slight increase in acidity and decreased in ascorbic acid content during storage period. Titratable acidity, TSS, pH and ascorbic acid content of fresh cut cauliflower were 0.25%, 6.5° Brix, 6.8 and 59.3 mg 100g -1 (Nasrin et al., 2022). Cauliflower wrapped with PE cling film or packed in LDPE bag (1% perforation) and stored at refrigerator (6±1°C and 50±5% RH) could retain white colour, good sensory quality, firm and fresh curds with minimum loss in weight, texture and spoilage. The shelf life was 18 days for cling film wrapped and 16 days for LDPE packed curd stored at refrigerator, while it was only 3 days for control one stored at ambient condition. More water was accumulated and curd was suffered from rubbing in LDPE bag than that of cling film that creates more spots on curds."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4381860671.json b/main/part_2/4381860671.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32f3d739142fec4fab4c982fe68ab4f33bbf2546 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4381860671.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3d673c1c173426744d744b3907cdea0f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/0a843254-8aec-4a23-bb2f-78dd69534268/content","id":"-41409407"},"keywords":["Antioxidants","Cross-talk between Heterodera filipjevi and cadmium","Heterodera filipjevi","Hordeum vulgare","Oxidative stress","Trace metal"],"sieverID":"49b30f28-e3b7-46f2-90af-235e76583f66","content":"Aims This research aimed to establish how Hordeum vulgare responds to abiotic and biotic stress affecting in tandem. Methods Plants were inoculated with Heterodera filipjevi and treated with cadmium (Cd) concentration (5 μM) that can occur in the cultivated soil. To verify the hypothesis about participation of increased antioxidative defence in H. vulgare under stress, biochemical and microscopic methods were implemented.Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is a globally important cereal crop. Its grains are used to produce human food, livestock feed and beverages by malting, brewing, and distilling industries as well as biofuels (Tricase et al. 2018). In natural conditions, crop plants, including spring and winter barley are affected by a plethora of environmental stresses. Particularly in the face of global climate changes, which are becoming more and more noticeable, it is rarely seen that crop plants need to deal with only one environmental stress during their growth and development. A much more common case is the situation when plants have to response to several abiotic or biotic stresses operating simultaneously or sequentially. Plants draw the mineral nutrients from the soil for building organic compounds and finally for yielding. Moreover, soil is a source of many stress factors (Raza et al. 2019).Among the soil origin abiotic stresses are water deficit or its excess, salinity, nutrient imbalance, unfavourable pH (Niedziela et al. 2014;Pandey et al. 2017). What is more, soils in many areas around the world are strongly polluted with trace metals and metalloids, including cadmium (Cd) as a non-essential highly toxic element (Muszyńska et al. 2019c). The Cd pollution in agricultural regions is mostly due to the application of contaminated sewage sludges, phosphate fertilizers, irrigation water and plant protection products (Paunov et al. 2018). Cd can accumulate in the grains of cereal plants and then can cause serious problems with health of the livestock and human and with the crop production (Labudda 2011;Deng et al. 2019). Cd also significantly affects plant growth and development as well as physiological processes including among others photosynthesis, nutrient metabolism, and antioxidant machinery (Gill and Tuteja 2010). Besides abiotic stressors, the most economically significant groups of pathogens such as cyst nematodes of the genus Heterodera and Globodera and viruses (wheat mosaic virus and barley yellow mosaic virus), protist Plasmodiophora brassicae, and fungus and funguslike species of the genus Phytophthora, Pythium, Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, and Verticillium are soil-borne pathogens of plants (Labudda 2018). Cereal cyst nematodes are closely related parasitic species that attack cereals. Until now, eleven cereal cyst nematodes species have been described. Of these Heterodera latipons, H. avenae and H. filipjevi are the most economically important pathogens for the worldwide production of cereals (Toumi et al. 2018). The rye cyst nematode H. filipjevi (Madzhidov) Stelter is an obligate biotrophic sedentary parasite, mainly infecting barley and wheat (Dababat and Fourie 2018). The H. filipjevi parasitism on roots of cereal plants causes the grain yield losses reach up to 50% (Pariyar et al. 2016).In view of the classical Levitt's theory (Levitt 1972), which shows the plant physiological mechanisms during response to stress, different abiotic and biotic stressors may be considered as primary stress and then as its result, a secondary stress may appear. In plant organisms, the secondary stress is always linked to the changes of redox balance in cells, so oxidative stress may be induced. Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and an effectiveness of the cellular systems to neutralize them. ROS such as singlet oxygen, superoxide anion, hydroxyl radical or hydrogen peroxide are continuously produced during various kinds of metabolic processes, including photosynthesis and respiration. The ROS increased content in plants can lead to damage of nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and plant pigments (Muszyńska and Labudda 2019;Muszyńska et al. 2019a). To preclude the impoverishment of cellular functions, the ROS level is controlled by enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems. The enzymatic antioxidant system encompasses mainly superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), various peroxidases and enzymes of the ascorbate-glutathione pathway (Labudda and Azam 2014;Muszyńska et al. 2018b;Kapoor et al. 2019), whereas non-enzymatic system consists of reduced molecules of glutathione (GSH) and ascorbate (ASA) and a large group of phenolic metabolites (Saxena et al. 2016;Durak et al. 2019;Muszyńska et al. 2020). Salicylic acid (SA) is described as a phenolic phytohormonal player during signalling and regulating of the numerous plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses (Morkunas et al. 2011(Morkunas et al. , 2018;;Maruri-López et al. 2019).In published literature, many research results demonstrate plant responses to Cd (for review see Martinka et al. (2014) and Loix et al. (2017)). However, the applied Cd concentrations were often not realistic and significantly differ from the Cd level in contaminated soil (Sanità di Toppi and Gabbrielli 1999). Therefore, based on published results by Milone et al. (2003) and Muszyńska et al. (2018a), we chose a realistic concentration of Cd which can occur in the cultivated soil. Therefore, we hypothesized that the enhanced antioxidative defence system could play a role of a great importance in the plant systemic physiological mechanisms to resist oxidative stress and damage induced dually by the cyst nematode parasitism and Cd exposure. To find that out, we used a biochemicalphysiological approach in combination with microscopic observations. This paper highlights how spring barley plants respond to dual environmental stresses, namely the cyst nematode infection and Cd exposition.Seeds of the spring barley Hordeum vulgare L. cv. 'Airway' were washed in tap water for 2 h and next they were surface decontaminated in 5% NaOCl with 0.2% Tween 20 for 10 min with stirring. They were rinsed under tap water for 1 h and next incubated for 1 h in 0.2% Plant Preservative Mixture (PPM) (Plant Cell Technologies, Inc., Washington DC, USA) to exclude potential contamination by microorganisms. The decontaminated barley seeds were put (embryos upwards) side by side into Petri dishes (9 cm diameter) on a 0.2% PPM-soaked filter paper and covered. After 18 h incubation at 4 °C in the dark, the seeds were kept in the dark at 23 °C for 2 days (Labudda et al. 2020b). Twelve germinated seeds were planted into a plastic pot (25 × 25/26 cm) with saucer. Pot was filled with a commercial horticultural substrate consisted of a mixture of low-moor and high-moor peats (0-20 mm fraction). Substrate had no addition of mineral fertilizers, its pH in water was in the range of 5.6-6.8 and before planting it was autoclaved at 121 °C, 0.1 MPa for 20 min. To each pot aliquot of one hundred and fifty ml of sterile 0.2 × Knop medium (pH 6.4) was added. Barley plants were cultivated in a growth chamber MLR-350 (Sanyo, Tokyo, Japan) at 25 °C during the day and at 23 °C at night with a 16 h/8 h day/night cycle under a photosynthetic photon flux density of 100 ± 25 μmol/m 2 /s and at 50% humidity. Every 2 days plants were watered with 100 ml sterile milli-Q water.Cysts of Heterodera filipjevi (Madzhidov) Stelter were collected from naturally cyst nematode-settled experimental wheat fields of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) in Yozgat (39°08'N, 34°10′E; altitude 985 m a.s.l.) in the Central Anatolian Plateau of Turkey. Cysts were extracted from rhizospheres and roots of Triticum aestivum plants harvested at the end of the growing season. The modified extraction protocol presented by Ashrafi et al. (2017) was used. Hatching of pre-parasitic H. filipjevi juveniles was provoked by the cyst incubation in sterile 3000 μM zinc chloride at 17 °C. Freshly hatched pre-parasitic juveniles were carefully washed 6 times in sterile milli-Q water and then were suspended in water.Pots with 7-day-old plants were divided into four groups, nematode-uninoculated and cadmiumuntreated controls (C), nematode-inoculated (N), cadmium-treated (Cd) and both nematode-inoculated and cadmium-treated (N + Cd) plants. Plants from the N and N + Cd groups were inoculated with approximately 2400 freshly hatched pre-parasitic H. filipjevi juveniles suspended in sterile milli-Q water per pot and plants were watered with 100 ml sterile milli-Q water. Plants from the Cd and N + Cd groups were watered with 100 ml sterile milli-Q water enriched with 5 μM CdCl 2 . C plants were watered as well. Barley plants from all these experimental groups were collected after 14 days of stress exposition. This short-term experimental time was chosen based on our previous published observations (Labudda et al. 2020b) reflected the dynamics of growth and development of H. filipjevi larvae in spring barley (the same cultivar as tested in this article) roots under conditions of pot experiment. At 14 days post-inoculation (dpi), most sedentary J2 larvae moulted to J3 larvae, which indicated that the 14 dpi syncytia met their nutritional demands. About 14 dpi, the J3 larvae fed intensively to reach the J4 stage and sexual maturity after 21 dpi and start reproducing. Four plants were used for each bulked sample and experiments were conducted in three biological replicates.Evaluation of physiological status and antioxidative system of barley plantsThe amounts of photosynthetic pigments were assayed according to Lichtenthaler (1987). Leaf samples (100 mg) were macerated in 10 ml of ice-cold 80% acetone with addition of calcium carbonate and centrifuged for 15 min at 4 °C (16,000×g). The absorbance of acetone extracts was measured at 470, 646 and 663 nm in Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The chlorophyll a (chl a), chlorophyll b (chl b) and carotenoid amounts were calculated according to Wellburn (1994). Total chlorophylls (chl a + b), the ratio of chlorophyll a to b (chl a:b) and the ratio of chl a + b to carotenoids (chl a + b:carotenoids) were also estimated.Measurement of superoxide anion contents was performed according to Doke's method (Mai et al. 2013). Barley leaves (100 mg) were immersed in 1 ml of the 0.01 M K/Na phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) containing 0.05% nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) and 0.01 M sodium azide. Samples were incubated in the dark for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation, reaction solutions (without leaves) were heated at 85 °C for 15 min and rapidly cooled on ice-bath. Superoxide anions content was expressed as absorbance at 580 nm per gram of fresh weight (FW).The H 2 O 2 content was estimated according to procedure by Junglee et al. (2014). Leaf samples (100 mg) were homogenized in mixture containing 0.25 ml of 10 mM K/Na-phosphate buffer (pH 5.8), 0.25 ml of 0.1% trichloroacetic acid and 0.5 ml of 1 M KI. Supernatants obtained by the leaf homogenates centrifugation (4 °C, 15 min, 16,000×g) were kept in the dark for 20 min at room temperature. Next, the samples were centrifuged (10 min, 16,000×g), and the absorbance was measured at 350 nm in Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The H 2 O 2 content was estimated from a standard curve and calculated per gram of FW.Leaf samples (200 mg) of barley plants were homogenized in a mortar with quartz sand and 2 ml of ice-cold extraction buffer (pH 7.2) containing 50 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris)-HCl, 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 5% glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone. Homogenates were centrifuged (4 °C, 20 min, 16,000×g) and supernatants were collected.Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was measured according to Kostyuk and Potapovich (1989). A reaction reagent was prepared by mixing equal volumes of 0.067 M K/Na phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and 0.025 M EDTA. The pH value of this reagent was adjusted to 10.0 by tetramethylethylenediamine. Next, 0.05 ml of reaction reagent and 0.12 ml of milli-Q water were added to 0.005 ml of supernatant. The enzyme reaction was started by the pipetting of 0.005 ml of 2.5 μM quercetin in dimethyl sulfoxide. Measurements were conducted in Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The absorbance at 406 nm was measured for 20 min with reads every 1 min. The one arbitrary unit of SOD activity was defined as 0.01 decrease of absorbance after 1 min per gram of FW.Catalase (CAT) activity was measured according to Aebi (1984). The supernatant (0.002 ml) was mixed with 0.018 ml of 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.2) and 0.01 ml of 0.168% hydrogen peroxide in the same buffer. Measurements were conducted at 37 °C in UV-Star 96-well plate (Greiner, Monroe, NC, USA) on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The absorbance at 240 nm was recorded for 10 min with reads every 1 min. The CAT activity was expressed as a decomposition of μmol of hydrogen peroxide per minute and gram of FW.Peroxidase activity (POD) was measured according to Lück (1962). The supernatant (0.005 ml) was mixed with an activity reagent consisting of 0.49% pphenylenediamine and 0.049% hydrogen peroxide in 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.2 or 8.8). Measurements were performed at 37 °C in Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The absorbance at 485 nm was recorded for 10 min with reads every 1 min. The POD activity was expressed in arbitrary unit, separately for pH 7.2 (POD 7.2 ) and 8.8 (POD 8.8 ). The one unit of POD activity was defined as 0.1 increase of absorbance after 1 min per gram of FW.Guaiacol peroxidase activity (GOPX) was measured according to Chance and Maehly (1955). The supernatant (0.005 ml) was mixed with an activity reagent consisting of 5000 μM guaiacol and 2500 μM hydrogen peroxide in 0.05 M acetic buffer, pH 5.6. Measurements were conducted at 37 °C in Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The absorbance at 470 nm was recorded for 10 min with reads every 1 min. The GOPX activity was expressed in μmol of formed tetraguaiacol (ɛ = 26.6 mM −1 cm −1 ) per minute and gram of FW.Ascorbate peroxidase activity (APX) was measured according to Nakano and Asada (1981). The supernatant (0.005 ml) was mixed with an activity reagent consisting of 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.2, 2000 μM ASA, 5000 μM EDTA and 100 μM hydrogen peroxide. The APX activity was measured at 25 °C in UV-Star 96-well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader by monitoring the rate of ASA oxidation for 10 min with absorbance reads every 1 min at 290 nm. The APX activity was expressed in μmol of ASA breakdown (ɛ = 2.8 mM −1 cm −1 ) per minute and gram of FW.Dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) activity was measured according to Trümper et al. (1994). The supernatant (0.01 ml) was mixed with an activity reagent consisting of 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.2, 4000 μM GSH and 1000 μM dehydroascorbic acid (DHA). The DHAR activity was measured at 30 °C in UV-Star 96well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader by monitoring the rate of DHA reduction for 10 min with absorbance reads every 1 min at 265 nm. The DHAR activity was expressed in μmol of ASA formation (ɛ = 14 mM −1 cm −1 ) per minute and gram of FW.Glutathione reductase (GR) activity was measured according to Foyer and Halliwell (1976). The supernatant (0.01 ml) was mixed with an activity reagent consisting of 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.2, 0.25 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), 1000 μM EDTA and 1000 μM oxidized glutathione (GSSG). Measurements were carried out at 37 °C in Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader and the change in absorbance at 340 nm was monitored for 20 min with reads every 1 min. GR activity was expressed as μmol of oxidized NADPH per minute and gram of FW.Nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) activity was measured according to Sakamoto et al. (2002). The supernatant (0.01 ml) was mixed with an activity reagent consisting of 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.2, 0.2 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.6 mM S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO). Measurements were performed at 37 °C in Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader and change in absorbance at 340 nm was monitored for 20 min with reads every 1 min. GSNOR activity was expressed as μmol of oxidized NADH per minute and gram of FW.Arginase (ARG) activity in supernatants was measured according to Labudda et al. (2016a). Briefly, after the activation of ARG (5 mM MnCl 2 , 56 °C, 10 min), the supernatants were incubated at 37 °C with 0.25 M Larginine (pH 9.6). The reactions were stopped after 1 h b y p i p e t t i n g t h e m i x t u r e c o n s i s t i n g o f H 2 SO 4 :H 3 PO 4 :H 2 O (1:3:7, v/v/v). Next, 9% αisonitrosopropiophenone in 96% ethanol was added, and samples were kept at 96 °C for 45 min. Following this incubation, samples were incubated for 10 min in the dark at room temperature. The absorbance was measured at λ = 550 nm in Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. Urea level was calculated based on the standard curve and ARG activity was expressed as μmol of formed urea per hour and gram of FW.Leaf samples (100 mg) were ground in a mortar with quartz sand on ice-bath. Phenolic metabolites were extracted from leaves with 5 ml of ice-cold 80% methanol and obtained homogenates were centrifuged for 15 min at 4 °C (16,000×g). The level of total phenols, hydroxycinnamoyl tartaric acid esters, flavonols, and anthocyanins was measured according to Fukumoto and Mazza (2000). The methanol extracts were mixed with 0.1% hydrochloric acid solution prepared in 96% ethanol and 2% hydrochloric acid solution prepared in milli-Q water. Then 15 min after sample incubation in the dark, the absorbance was read in UV-Star 96-well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The absorbance at 280, 320, 360, and 520 nm reflected total phenol, hydroxycinnamoyl tartaric acid ester, flavonol, and anthocyanin contents, respectively. The chlorogenic acid (total phenols), caffeic acid (hydroxycinnamoyl tartaric acid esters), quercetin (flavonols), and cyanidin (anthocyanins) were used as equivalents for measurement of specific phenolic metabolites. To estimate the polyphenol content, the Folin-Ciocalteu method was implemented (Labudda et al. 2016b). Concisely, 20 μl of methanol extract was mixed with 1.58 ml of milli-Q water and 100 μl of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (POCH, Gliwice, Poland). Samples were incubated at room temperature for 4 min, and 300 μl of 1 M saturated sodium carbonate was added and incubation at 40 °C for 30 min was performed. The absorbance was read at 740 nm in Nunc U-bottom 96well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader and polyphenol content was quantified as gallic acid equivalent. The results of the phenolic metabolite levels were expressed in mg of the respective equivalents per 100 g of FW.The total salicylic acid (free and conjugated forms of SA) amounts were quantified using the reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) with fluorescence detection according to Szkop et al. (2017) with small modifications. Briefly, leaf samples (100 mg) of barley plants were homogenized in a mortar with quartz sand and 1.5 ml 0.4 M K 2 HPO 4 , they were vigorously agitated for 15 min at 70 °C and centrifuged at 16,000×g for 10 min. Next, 1 ml of collected supernatants was mixed with 0.15 ml of 10 M HCl and the acidic hydrolysis at 95 °C for 90 min was performed. Afterwards, aliquots (0.85 ml) of ethyl acetate were added to the acidic hydrolysates and samples were vigorously vortexed and centrifuged at 16,000×g for 10 min. The upper organic phases (0.6 ml) were mixed with 200 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and samples were vigorously vortexed and centrifuged at 16,000×g for 10 min. The lower aqueous phases (0.2 ml) were collected, clarified using 0.45 μm Millex-HV filters (Merck Millipore Ltd., Cork, Ireland) and placed in HPLC vials. The conditions of the HPLC analysis were described in detail in Szkop et al. (2017), and assays were performed using system consisted of a binary pump (Model 1525, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA), a fluorometric detector (Model 474, Waters Corporation) and an autosampler (Model 717plus, Waters Corporation). Chromatographic separations were conducted at room temperature on a C18 column (Symmetry 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm, Waters Corporation) guarded by a C18 precolumn (Symmetry 3.9 × 20 mm, 5 μm, Waters Corporation) with a linear gradient elution. The content of SA was quantified based on the external standard calibration curve prepared with the use of HPLC-grade SA (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA).To visualization of the secondary metabolites, five barley leaves for each treatment at the same developmental stage were taken from randomly chosen plants. Handmade cross-sections were obtained from the middle part of leaf blades by cutting them with a razor blade. The observations were performed in water according to Muszyńska et al. (2019b) under UV irradiation. The fluorescence microscope equipped with a U-MNU narrow-band filter cube (Olympus-Provis, Tokyo, Japan) was used for the autofluorescence detection of the secondary metabolites accumulated in barley leaves.The 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARs) assay according to Hodges et al. (1999) was implemented. Two hundred μl of methanol extract (obtained as described in Phenolic metabolites paragraph) was added to 800 μl 0.5% 2-thiobarbituric acid dissolved in 20% trichloroacetic acid solution. Then sample incubation at 90 °C for 20 min was performed and reactions were stopped on ice bath. Samples were centrifuged (10 min, 16,000×g) and the absorbance of supernatants was measured at 440, 532 and 600 nm in Nunc U-bottom 96well plate on a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. TBARs level was calculated and expressed in μmol per gram of FW.To determine protein carbonylation (carbonyl groups, C=O) level, leaf sample (100 mg) was ground with liquid nitrogen in mortar and 2 ml of extraction buffer (0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2 with 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Triton X-100) was added. Homogenate was centrifuged (16,000×g) for 15 min at 4 °C. Supernatant was collected and protein content was measured using Bradford reagent and bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich) as a standard. Extract volume containing 180 μg of proteins was collected, and proteins were precipitated with cold acetone. Protein carbonylation was determined by derivatization of protein carbonyls with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) using a procedure based on Levine et al. (1994). Briefly, 300 μl of 10 mM DNPH in 2.5 M HCl was added to precipitated proteins and incubated for 1 h in darkness with mixing every 15 min. Afterwards proteins were washed 3 times with cold ethanol/ethyl acetate mixture (1:1). Dinitrophenyl group (DNP)labelled proteins were then dissolved in 90 μl of rehydration buffer containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1propanesulfonate and 40 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol.Extracts containing 5 μg of derivatized proteins were mixed (1:1, v/v) with a sample buffer containing 126 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 20% glycerol, 4% s o d i u m d o d e c y l s u l p h a t e ( S D S ) , 1 0 % 2mercaptoethanol and 0.004% bromophenol blue. After incubation at 95 °C for 5 min, protein samples were centrifuged (5 min, 16,000×g) and separated on 11% acrylamide gel with SDS in a 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine and 0.1% SDS running buffer (pH 8.3) at 60 V for 15 min followed by 1 h at a constant current of 25 mA per gel until the blue dye front reached the bottom of the gel (Mini-Protean electrophoresis system; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis separated proteins were transferred electrophoretically to a nitrocellulose membrane (Mini-Protean electrophoresis system; Bio-Rad) to detect carbonylated protein levels. After 1 h of blocking at room temperature with 5% non-fat dried milk, the membrane was incubated with anti-DNP polyclonal rabbit antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich; 1:1500) in 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) with 0.5% Tween 20. Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat antibodies against rabbit IgG (Sigma-Aldrich; 1:20000) were used as the secondary antibodies. The blots were visualized with a standard NBT/5-bromo-4-chloro-3′-indolyphosphate (BCIP) solution containing 0.015% of BCIP and 0.03% of NBT in 10 mL of 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 9.5, with 0.1 M NaCl, and 0.05 M MgCl 2 . To determine molecular weight (MW) of proteins, SpectraTM Multicolor Broad Range Protein Marker (Thermo Scientific) was used. Blots were digitalized with G:BOX EF2 (Syngene, Cambridge, UK) and the intensity of bands was quantified as % volume with free BioVision software (Vilber, Collégien, France). The average intensity of all bands was determined. Results were compared with control barley plants, to which a value of 100% has been assigned.Representative data were shown as means ± SD. Results were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The significant differences between experimental groups were determined using Tukey's honest significant difference test at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistica program, version 13.3 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).The amount of photosynthetic pigments in leaves of various experimental treatments was differed. Although these values were statistically significant, the changes were not profound (Fig. 1). The content of chl a was 0.9fold lower in N than in C plants and 1.1-fold higher in Cd than in C plants. N + Cd plants presented 1.1-fold higher level of chl a in comparison with N plants and 0.9-fold lower than in Cd plants (Fig. 1a). The amount of chl b was 0.9-fold lower in N than in C plants (Fig. 1b). The level of total chlorophylls was 0.9-fold lower in N than in C plants and 1.1-fold higher in Cd than in C plants. N + Cd plants showed 1.1-fold higher level of total chlorophylls in comparison with N plants and 0.9fold lower than in Cd plants (Fig. 1c). It was noticed that values of chl a:b ratio were on the same level (about 3) in all experimental groups (Fig. 1d). The number of carotenoids was 0.9-fold lower in N than in C plants and 1.2-fold higher in Cd than in C plants. N + Cd plants had 1.1-fold higher amount of carotenoids in comparison with N plants and 0.8-fold lower level as against Cd plants (Fig. 1e). It was observed that the ratio of chl a + b to carotenoids was 0.9-fold lower in Cd than in C plants and 1.2-fold higher in N + Cd than in Cd plants (Fig. 1f).The level of superoxide anions was 1.6-fold higher in N than in C plants and 1.3-fold higher in Cd than in C plants. 0.4-fold lower content of superoxide anions was detected in N + Cd plants as against N plants and 0.5fold lower its content in N + Cd plants than in Cd ones (Fig. 2a). The level of H 2 O 2 molecules was similar in C, N and Cd plants and it was around 453 nmol g −1 (Fig. 2b). Significant decrease in H 2 O 2 content to about 20 nmol g −1 was noted in N + Cd plants in relation to C, N and Cd ones (Fig. 2b).The SOD activity was found to be 1.2-fold higher in N and N + Cd than in C plants and 1.3-fold higher in N + Cd plants in comparison with Cd plants (Fig. 3a). The activity of CAT was down-regulated by 0.9-fold in N plants in relation to controls and up-regulated by 1.1fold in N + Cd plants in relation to N plants (Fig. 3b). The POD activity showed the same trends at two different pH values, i.e. its activity was stimulated similarly by about 1.3-fold and 1.4-fold at pH 7.2 (Fig. 3c) and pH 8.8 (Fig. 3d), respectively in N, Cd and N + Cd plants as against control plants. The same regularity was also clearly visible in case of GOPX activity as the up-regulation by about 1.3-fold was noted in N, Cd and N + Cd plants when they were compared to C plants (Fig. 3e). Regarding the APX activity, it was found the increase of activity in N, Cd and N + Cd plants by 5.5-, 3.7-and 1.9-folds, respectively in comparison to control plants and APX activity dropped significantly by a third and half in N + Cd plants as against N and Cd plants, respectively (Fig. 3f). As Fig. 3G shows, the activity of DHAR was increased about 1.3-fold in N and Cd plants than in controls, and it was decreased about 0.8-fold in N + Cd plants in comparison both with N and Cd plants. The GR activity presented similar activity level (around 18 μmol min −1 g −1 ) in N and Cd plants and this value was lower than activity in C plants. However, the GR activity was meaningfully enhanced in N + Cd plants (about 1.8-fold) in comparison with N and Cd plants (Fig. 3h). In leaves of barley plants separately infected with the cyst nematode and treated with Cd the activity of the GSNOR was significantly stimulated by 3-fold upon infection and 5-fold during the Cd exposition in relation to the control plants, whereas in N + Cd plants statistically significant decrease in its activity was observed. In turn, N + Cd plants did not differ significantly from control plants (Fig. 3i). In the case of ARG, the highest activity was detected in N + Cd plants (about 6 μmol h −1 g −1 ) and the lowest (about 3 μmol h −1 g −1 ) in control plants. In comparison with C plants, N and Cd plants were characterized by around 1.3-fold stimulated ARG activity (Fig. 3j).Although the accumulation of total phenols, hydroxycinnamoyl tartaric acid esters, flavonols and anthocyanins (Fig. 4a-d) showed statistically significant changes, these parameters gave the impression of being not key influential on plant antioxidant responses during applied stress conditions. However, some trends were noticeable. The above-mentioned parameters did not always differ significantly between N and C plants (Fig. 4a-d ). The content of total phenols, hydroxycinnamoyl tartaric acid esters and flavonols decreased by about 7% in Cd plants in comparison with the control ones (Fig. 4a-c). Furthermore, the level of flavonols and anthocyanins was found to be slightly enhanced by about 6% in N + Cd plants as against Cd ones (Fig. 4c,d). Next, it was found that the polyphenol content was significantly decreased by about 26% in Cd and N + Cd plants in comparison with C ones, and its accumulation was diminished by 20% in N + Cd in relation to N plants (Fig. 4e). The total salicylic acid content was about 1.3-fold higher in N, Cd and N + Cd plants than in C plants, while there were no statistically significant differences in SA between N+ Cd plants and N, Cd ones (Fig. 4f).Visualization of secondary metabolites by microscopic method revealed diversification of tested plants (Fig. 5a-d). Upon excitation with UV-light, leaf cells emitted an intensive blue autofluorescence which was brighter in C (Fig. 5a) and N (Fig. 5b) plants than in Cdtreated ones (Fig. 5c). Additionally, in Cd plants red autofluorescence zones appeared (Fig. 5c). Interestingly, when double stress was applied, blue autofluorescence was almost not visible, but N + Cd treatment induced orange-red autofluorescence of mesophyll cells (Fig. 5d).One of the ways to evaluate oxidative damage in plants is measurement of the TBARs content, which is well-known marker of intensity of the lipid peroxidation processes. TBARs level was 1.1-fold increased in N, 0.7-and 0.4-fold decreased in C and N + Cd plants, respectively in comparison with C plants. Moreover, the amount of TBARs was 0.3-fold lower in N + Cd than in N plants and 0.6-fold lower in N + Cd than in Cd plants (Fig. 6).In addition to the lipid peroxidation, the protein carbonylation level is another marker of intensity of the oxidative damage in plants. As Fig. 7 shows, the general amount of the carbonylated proteins increased by over 76% in barley inoculated with the cyst nematode in comparison with control group of plants. However, in response to Cd, the intensity of protein carbonylation was lowered by 51%, and it dropped by 18% in response to both stresses. The amount of the C=O groups was 1.3-fold higher in N + Cd than in Cd plants and 0.5-fold lower in N + Cd than in N plants (Fig. 7). Not only the overall protein carbonylation, but also patterns of carbonylated proteins were changed. Bands with MW of ~160 kDa, 140 kDa were observed only in N plants. Moreover, in N plants bands with MW of ~110 kDa, and 70 kDa were clearly visible, but they were not detected in Cd plants, and were much less intense in C and N + Cd barley plants. Band with molecular mass of ~58 kDa showed similar intensity in all plant groups. In C plants band with MW ~55 kDa was present, but it was not detected in N + Cd and was much less intense in both Cd and N plants. Carbonylated protein with MW of 50 kDa was also common for all plant groups, however it was the most abundant in N plants, medium intensity was observed in N + Cd as well as in C barley plants, and lowest carbonylation level was noticed in Cd treated plants. Three bands with masses ~45 kDa, 40 kDa 35 kDa were present in all plant groups, but they were the most intense in N and C plants (Fig. 7).Maintenance of redox balance in plant cells seems to be a universal link connecting plant response to various environmental stresses (Suzuki et al. 2014;Choudhury et al. 2017;Woźniak et al. 2019). To protect cells against oxidative damage, plants evolved several defence mechanisms based on both low-molecular antioxidant compounds as well as on enzymes that directly or indirectly help survive in adverse environmental conditions. Here, we focused on the elucidation of antioxidant mechanisms of spring barley plants during response to abiotic (cadmium exposure) and biotic (cyst nematode infection) stresses occurring simultaneously.The concentration and composition of photosynthetic pigments are strong prognostic markers of the plant (Blackburn 2007). Our studies showed that the infection with H. filipjevi and the treatment with realistic Cd concentration (5 μM) induced only mild changes in pigment parameters in leaves of barley plants. This was because the parasitizing H. filipjevi had to guarantee a steady influx of photoassimilates to the syncytial feeding sites in roots from which nematodes drew nutrients for own use. Thusly, despite the stress caused by infestation and cadmium presence, infected plants were maintained alive with an effective photosynthetic apparatus. This was well reflected in the practically constant value of chl a:b ratio in all four experimental groups. According to Kitajima and Hogan (2003) chl a:b ratio is an indicator of nitrogen partitioning within leaves and it is positively correlated with the ratio of photosystem II (PSII) cores to light harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex. Thus, despite double stress, the degree of nitrogen nutrition of barley plants remained at a relatively optimal level, so the plants remained still vital (Kitajima and Hogan 2003). The accumulated carotenoids in barley plants that grew in the presence of cadmium are noteworthy. Carotenoids are accessory pigments in chloroplasts. They increase light harvesting and have photoprotective properties, so can quench triplet chlorophyll and singlet oxygen molecules. Singlet oxygen molecules are the main ROS generated during photosynthesis, and their ineffective neutralization can bring photooxidative damage initiated by (a)biotic stresses Fig. 3 The activity of enzymes (a-j) in the leaves of Hordeum vulgare plants cultivated for two weeks on commercial horticultural substrate after Heterodera filipjevi inoculation and cadmium application. Results are shown as means ± SD. Different letters indicate means which are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to one-way analysis of variance and a posthoc Tukey's test (Havaux 2014). Accumulated carotenoids in Cd plants could serve as one of the components of the plant nonenzymatic antioxidant machinery and prevent photoinhibition of PSII via non-photochemical quenching and consequently the production of ROS was limited (Zhao et al. 2017).In the present study, we observed a substantial increase in superoxide anions in barley leaves because of Class III plant peroxidases (POD and GOPX) take part in numerous physiological processes, for example in lignin and suberin production, the cell wall components cross-linking, formation of phytoalexins and they oxidize broad spectrum of substrates at the cost of H 2 O 2 molecules (Almagro et al. 2009). There were observed the same trends in GOPX and POD activities in the three stress situations compared to the control plants. The response of class III peroxidases was non-specific in relation to the analysed stress variants and it proved that in the leaves of barley there was a change in ROS metabolism in response to stresses, what is widely known and well documented in the literature (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2019b). The activity of APX, belonging to class 1 peroxidases, was quite different from class III peroxidases, and the differences between plants from four experimental groups were clearly outlined. APX participates in H 2 O 2 scavenging via Foyer-Halliwell-Asada pathway engaging reduced form of ascorbate and glutathione as an important non-enzymatic Tiryakioglu et al. (2006), that showed enhanced activity of APX in barley under Cd exposure.However, regarding our research hypothesis about an effective antioxidative system under a twofold induced stress in barley plants, our discovery that the activity of APX was dropped in N + Cd plants in relation to N and Cd plants seemed to be a landmark in our study. It should also be mentioned that SA, a known phenolic plant hormone, interplays with ROS and GSH in stressed plants (Herrera-Vásquez et al. 2015). Durner and Klessig (1995) showed that SA reversible inhibited the APX activity with no effect on GOPX. Therefore, the increased number of SA in N + Cd plants could lead to direct inhibition of APX by SA, what altered the cellular redox state and switched on specific defence response in these plants. Our results suggested that H 2 O 2 scavenging in N + Cd plants was shifted to the pathway of non-enzymatic H 2 O 2 neutralization by the direct reaction with ASA. Diminished APX activity promoted a higher ASA pool in the cells, which meant that ASA interacted directly with H 2 O 2 while getting rid of H 2 O 2 from the cells (Grinstead 1960). As a result of the reaction of H 2 O 2 with ASA, DHA was formed (oxidized form of ASA), which became a substrate for DHAR. This system worked very well in N + Cd plants, because the DHAR activity was the similar as observed in the control plants, so the enzymatic recovery of the ASA pool was possible. One more observation confirmed our claim. DHAR uses two molecules of GSH to recover the ASA molecule but at the same time GSSG is produced. We observed that the GR activity was strongly stimulated in N + Cd plants. GR catalysed the transformation of GSSG to GSH, so regenerated GSH molecules were still available and/or they might afresh enter to reaction catalysed by DHAR or participate in other GSH-dependent defence mechanisms (Gullner et al. 2018;Labudda 2018). At least three possible options can be considered here. Firstly, H 2 O 2 might have been reduced by the direct reaction with GSH with simultaneous production of GSSG (Abedinzadeh et al. 1989). Secondly, uptaken and transported to leaves Cd ions might have been chelated by GSH, and formed Cd(GS) 2 complexes were presumably sequestrated into the vacuoles for detoxification, thus the Cd-induced oxidative damage was limited (Delalande et al. 2010). And finally, thirdly GSH is known to be a substrate for synthesis of phytochelatins (the oligomeric form of GSH). Phytochelatins could form the phytochelatin-Cd complexes and similar to Cd(GS) 2 complexes, were sequestrated into the vacuoles (Yen et al. 1999;Ahmad et al. 2019).Conjointly with ROS, reactive nitrogen species (RNS), including nitric oxide (NO), fulfil fundamental roles as mediators of plant growth and development and, they signal in acclimatization and tolerance to stresses (Turkan 2018). Moreover, NO reversibly binds the -SH group of cysteinyl residues and S-nitrosothiols (SNOs) are formed, including GSNO, an intracellular reservoir of NO (Jahnová et al. 2019). The level of GSNO in cells is regulated by GSNOR that catalyses the NADHdependent reduction of GSNO to GSSG and ammonia (NH 3 ) (Corpas and Barroso 2013). According to Kovacs et al. (2016) and Begara-Morales et al. ( 2019) ROSinduced inhibition of the GSNOR activity led to the increased GSNO accumulation in plant cells what resulted in up-regulated H 2 O 2 scavenging by the Foyer-Halliwell-Asada pathway. Clark et al. (2000) presented the GSNO-mediated irreversible inhibition of APX. This inhibitory effect was time dependent with about 70% inhibition of the APX activity after a 60-min incubation at room temperature. This additionally supports our described above assumptions regarding the regulation of APX activity in N + Cd plants. Results presented by us here and Kovacs et al. (2016) and Begara-Morales et al. (2019) suggest that the unique improved antioxidant capacity of N + Cd plants to some extent resulted from beneficial effect of accumulated GSNO (by inhibition of GSNOR). What is more, Jahnová et al. (2019) indicated that decreased GSNOR activity accompanied by an enhancement in the GSNO level can express in increased plant immunity against pathogens. Moreover, the enhanced GSNOR activity in N and Cd plants was noted, thus removing of excess amount of NO via GSNO breakdown to GSSG and NH 3 occurred, and effects of ROS and RNS on functioning of barley under separately cyst nematode infection and cadmium exposition were limited (Corpas and Barroso 2013).Our previous results showed that changes in plant nitrogen metabolism took place during cyst nematode infection (Labudda et al. 2020a). Arginase (ARG), nitrogen metabolism-linked enzyme, was another enzyme that was analysed in these studies. ARG is not an enzyme that directly participates in the metabolism of ROS, but it supplies substrate for the synthesis e.g. polyamines, important compounds in plant antioxidant response (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2019a). ARG produced ornithine and urea, and next ornithine was decarboxylated by ornithine decarboxylase to putrescine (diamine). Spermidine synthase from putrescine synthesised spermidine (triamine), and synthase converted spermidine to spermine (tetramine). Mentioned above polyamines are positively charged molecules, so they might bind to opposite charged molecules and probably might scavenge ROS (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2019a). Therefore, stimulated ARG activity in N + Cd plants might promote polyamine synthesis and indirectly enhance non-enzymatic antioxidant mechanism.Antioxidative mechanisms dependent on phenolic compounds did not play a key role in this experimental model. The content of phenolics (although some alternations at a statistically significant level) did not change to such an extent that their holistic physiological impact on plants could be assumed, and thus they were rather proved to only support other antioxidant responses operating in plants. The only thing to notice was the reduced polyphenol content in plants treated with Cd and under the influence of double stress. Polyphenols due to their interaction with ROS/RNS limit oxidative damage in cells (Hussain et al. 2016). The observed decline in polyphenol level in Cd and N + Cd plants resulted probably from their intake during response against these stress conditions. Spectrophotometric measurements of phenolic compounds were in accordance with microscopic analysis, which revealed lower intensity of blue autofluorescence of vacuolar compounds in Cd and N + Cd plants than in other treatments. It is also noteworthy that these two groups of plants were characterized by red autofluorescence of anthocyanins which was more visible in N + Cd leaves than in Cd ones. This statement was also confirmed by enhanced level of these compounds' accumulation in double-stressed plants.In our studies, we used two biochemical markers for the estimation of the oxidative damage intensity. Firstly, TBARs assay for the polyunsaturated fatty acids oxidation products detection, such as aldehydes, alkenals and hydroxyalkenals including particularly toxic molecules, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and malondialdehyde, was used (de Dios Alché 2019). Secondly, the western blotting profiling for the C=O groups formed in proteins as a result of the amino acid residues (mainly Arg, Pro, Thr and Lys) oxidation by ROS (protein carbonylation) was implemented (Kalemba and Pukacka 2014). It turned out that our hypothesis of higher antioxidant activity in N + Cd plants appeared to be true. The above discussed defence mechanisms working together proved to be efficient enough to prevent excessive lipid and protein oxidation by ROS. The ROS level was after all also reduced in these plants. Interestingly, the content of TBARs and the C=O groups was even lower in N + Cd than in control plants, so an integrity of cell membranes of these plants was maintained and cell damage and loss of the protein functions were significantly limited.The presented results expand the knowledge of defence mechanisms of barley treated with two contrasting stresses of different origin. For the first time, the involvement of antioxidants in responses against oxidative stress induced jointly by cyst nematodes and cadmium ions was characterized in detail. Our findings uncovered that the ROS neutralization machinery presented a remarkable effectiveness during double stress, which differs from that stimulated by one stressor acting singly. Therefore, simultaneous application of two stressors imposed on barley plants an unusual physiological acclimation expressed in a significant reduction of oxidative damage in double stressed specimens. Summarizing, to manage the acute Cd stress with short exposure time adapted to the dynamics of growth and development of cyst nematode larvae in roots under conditions of our pot experiment, barley plants could rapidly induce a multi-component model of stress response, in order to detoxify Cd ions and efficiently repair damage caused by double stress.the source, provide link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4396260709.json b/main/part_2/4396260709.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..849b33d5629029ab0e5f492338ef00eaa0d15fd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4396260709.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6a0e72fe775f302fcedd8a53d538914d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a81ed214-6ba2-4750-946f-dec5b7a6cefc/retrieve","id":"-1340012271"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0ef051fa-bbcd-4697-ac21-c6c121bf3937","content":"Este trabajo se llevó a cabo con el apoyo de las Iniciativas del CGIAR sobre Resiliencia Climática (ClimBeR), AgriLAC Resiliente y Ganadería y Clima. Nos gustaría agradecer a todos los financiadores que apoyaron esta investigación a través de sus contribuciones al CGIAR Trust Fund.Los servicios climáticos son importantes para Guatemala, dada la alta vulnerabilidad climática a la que se enfrenta el país. Contar con servicios climáticos eficientes que brinden y orienten la oportuna toma de decisiones en los diversos sectores, ayuda a aumenta la resiliencia de la población y sus medios de vida. El Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos (MNSC) se basa en las 4 áreas prioritarias con base a lo estipulado por la Organización Meteorología Mundial (OMM), siendo estas: agricultura y seguridad alimentaria, reducción del riesgo de desastres, salud y agua. Las consecuencias del cambio y la varibilidad climática afecta a todos estos sectores.El Instituto Nacional de Vulcanología, Sismología, Meteorología e Hidrología (INSIVUMEH), como ente rector de los Servicios Meteorológicos e Hidrológicos (SMHN) de Guatemala, ha liderado un esfuerzo conjunto con la Universidad Rafael Landívar y la Alianza Bioversity and CIAT para el establecimiento del Marco Nacional de los Servicios Climáticos para Guatemala. Basado en el marco que establece la OMM, tiene por finalidad coordinar actividades de servicios climáticos facilitando la colaboración conjunta entre los diferentes usuarios, investigadores y proveedores de de los servicios climáticos, con el objetivo de fortalecer la resiliencia de la sociedad y promover el crecimiento de los diversos sectores productivos del país incluyendo a los usuarios locales.Hacia el desarrollo del Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos, es importante considerar la participación de las instancias decisorias, los encargados de la formulación de políticas, los usuarios locales, los climatólogos y los expertos de los distintos sectores. En las directrices para la construcción del MNSC se ha considerado imprescindible conocer a los usuarios de los servicios climáticos para poder comprender lo que necesita y así proporcionar la información de una forma simple, accesible y oportuna, garantizando la calidad de la información y servicios derivados que se ofrecen 1 .El presente reporte busca informar sobre los avances alcanzados en el proceso de formulación del Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos en Guatemala. Previamente, en 2022, se logró completar el paso 1 del MNSC 2 , y, en 2023, se avanzó con la formulación del paso 2, lo cuál se reporta en el presente documento. Según los lineamientos de la OMM, se identificaron los actores clave dentro de la cadena de servicios climático (e.g., proveedorer, investigadores y usuarios), se documentó y sistematizo la información de fuentes nacionales e internacionales, se desarrolló un taller interinstitucional y un foro a partir del cual se determinó cuáles eran las capacidades actuales del SMHN y la capacidades que tienen los diferentes usuarios y proveedores en la cadena de servicios climáticos. Asimismo, se desarrolló el Taller Nacional de Consultas de las partes interesadas a partir del cual se evaluaron las capacidades y debilidades del SMHN desde el punto de vista de entrega de información y servicios a los diferentes sectores del país. Finalmente, se integró la Mesa Técnica del MNSC y se desarrolló la primera reunión Técnica para definir la nueva Visión de los SMHN.Con base a la realización de un taller interinstitucional y un foro se identificaron las capacidades para gestionar la información y los servicios climáticos en Guatemala, así como las oportunidades de mejora en cuanto a investigación climática, cobertura territorial con las redes de estaciones y la introducción constante de tecnología renovada que permita la generación de mejores pronósticos. En un taller de socialización se brindó los resultados de las acciones desarrolladas en 2022 y parte del 2023 para que los actores, decidieran conformar o ser parte del Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos.A continuación, se presenta la cadena de los usuarios y proveedores de los Servicios Meteorológicos identificada en el proceso del paso 1. Con la socialización de los resultados alcanzados en el Paso 1 del Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos en Guatemala se procedió a la implementación del Paso 2. El cual consiste en un Taller Nacional de Consultas de las partes interesadas.En el taller nacional de consultas de las partes interesadas se convocaron a todas las instituciones que se identificaron dentro de la cadena de servicios climáticos y se determinaron las deficiencias y elementos clave para que a partir de este proceso de consulta pueda plantearse un Plan de Acción para la ejecución del Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos (MNSC). El objetivo principal del taller nacional de consultas fue reunir al SMHN y a los proveedores, usuarios, academia, gobierno, investigación, entre otros actores, para poder determinar los mecanismos adecuados para mejorar y mantener el suministro de productos de información climáticos a diferentes usuarios y definir las funciones complementarias de las diversas partes interesadas en la cadena de valor nacional de los servicios climáticos.Mediante la técnica de grupos focales, se organizó un debate sobre los destinatarios de los servicios del SMHN y el modo de prestar tales servicios, donde se incluyó una evaluación de las necesidades de las partes interesadas que la organización debe atender. Se identificaron las competencias y los colaboradores, esto es, los demás actores que dan respuesta a esas necesidades o problemas, junto con los destinatarios a los que el SMHN debería prestar servicios. Se analizó de manera integral las necesidades que existen en la cadena de servicios climáticos y como el SMHN, atiende las necesidades o responde a sus requerimientos para la identificación de las oportunidades de mejorarlos o integrarlos con los servicios ofrecidos por otros proveedores de servicios climáticos en esta cadena identificada.Se utilizaron dos herramientas de trabajo para los gurpos focales: un análisis FODA y un análisis PESTLE. El FODA, es una técnica que busca identificar las fortalezas, oportunidades, debilidades y amenazas en este caso aplicado al SMHN, para que el mismo pueda mejorar su efectividad como proveedor de inforación y servicios climáticos en Guatemala, haciendo este análisis desde las necedades de los usuarios o experto externos al mismo. El análisis PESTLE, consistió en un análisis de los factores políticos, económicos, sociales, tecnológicos, legales (jurídicos) y ambientales (environmental), para poder comprender el entorno externo de la organización de los SMHN (ver Tabla 1).Los sectores priorizados fueron durante el taller de consultas de las partes interesadas fueron:-Sector Agropecuario.-Sector Salud.-Sector Gestión de Riesgos.-Sector Energía.-Sectores varios (i.e., vivienda, agua, bienestar animal) 3 .3 Se categorizó el último sector ya que se identificaron que había interés por otros sectores productivos y no productivos del país en ser parte del Marco Nacional de Servicios climáticos entre los cuales destacamos a bienestar animal, construcción, educación, entre otros. A continuación, se analizan los principales resultados del análisis FODA (preliminares), los cuáles se sintetizan en la Figura 2.A partir de este análisis sobre los SMHN, se evidencia que las instituciones involucradas en los proceso de consulta ven a INSIVUMEH como una institución que se ha ido fortaleciendo y generando cambios a lo largo del tiempo. Cuenta con credibilidad técnica y científica, que la proyectan para ser una institución líder de los servicios climáticos en Guatemala. INSIVUMEH no sólo es el ente rector que genera información en el país, sino que además se ocupa de promover el acceso y flujo de la información de manera abierta y oportuna.La información climática generada por INSIVUMEH brinda la oportunidad de generar productos y servicios que son de utilidad para la toma de decisiones en diversos sectores del país, en particular, el sector agricultura y el sector medioambiental. INSIVUMEH promueve la comunicación inter-institucional para el cumplimiento de este propósito. Productos de información incluyen boletines, información en redes sociales y el flujo de información a través de alianzas estratégicas.Se identificó que su actual estructura interna (el servicio meteorológico pertenece al Ministerio de Comunicaciones) debilita el actuar del INSIVUMEH por las prioridades y bajo presupuesto que se asigna para el desarrollo de sus actividades. Se han identificado otras debilidades relacionadas a la falta de equipos e infraestructura para responder de manera más eficiente a las solicitudes de los usuarios. La densidad de estaciones actual también representa una debilidad en relación a la generación de pronósticos de tiempo y clima, que suelen ser muy generales aún (poco detalle local).Por último, la principal amenaza identificada está relacionada a factores políticos y los cambios a nivel público que pueden poner en riesgo la continuidad de los procesos de actualización y desarrollo que se hayan logrado. Otras amenazas se relacionan con la seguridad de la instrumentación meteorológica en campo, problemas de mantenimiento y ubicación de los equipos, la falta de estructura interna para resguardar la información digital (baja digitalización de los datos), rotación de personal y algunas limitaciones presupuestarias. A través del análisis PESTLE, se ahondó en algunos elementos identificados en el análisis FODA. Se destacó como factores políticos principales que pueden limitar la generación del MNSC, la interrupción de los procesos institucionales por cambios de gobierno, la poca asignación de recursos a la investigación en servicios climáticos, así como el no ser una entidad autonoma puesto que depende de un Ministerio que no tiene las mismas prioridades y competencias que las de INSIVUMEH. A su vez, los factotes políticos identificados mismos factores guardan estrecha relación con algunos factores económicos identiticados, donde resalta la falta de presupuesto para ser una institución descentralizada que funcione más desde el ámbito local.En relación a los factores socioambientales se desatacó el tener un Estado Plurinacional. Además, un mecanismo de difusión de información climática en un sólo idioma como con el que se cuenta actualmente (español), no permite que el mensaje o la información llegue efectivamente a los productores agropecuarios. Asimismo los niveles de escolaridad en el país limitan la comprensión de la información que se proporciona, puesto que al ser muy técnica es muy poco comprensible para la mayoría de la población que se encuentra en condiciones de pobreza.En relación a los factores tecnológicos se refieren principalmente a la poca innovación para generar pronósticos más precisos, la cual se relaciona a la baja disponibilidad de estaciones por parte del SHMN y al hecho de no contar con un protocolo de interoperabilidad que les permita una compartición más fluída con otras fuentes de información. Esto último se relaciona con factores legales, siendo uno de los principales la falta de un mecanismo de interoperabilidad que permita garantizar a los proveedores de la información el resguardo de la información (e.g., privacidad de los datos). Por último, el factor medioambiental que destáco es la alta variabilidad climática que afronta Guatemala. Los cambios constantes en los patrones de lluvia y temperatura dificulta la fiabilidad de los pronósticos.La Figura 3, resume y complementa algunos de estos resultados. En un taller de seguimiento realizado el 22 de noviembre se realizó la primera reunión de Mesa Técnica del Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos, en coordinación con actores relevantes que pertenecen a las cadena de los servicios de climáticos del paí. Cerca de 44 instituciones mostrarón interés por integrar y participar activamente de la mesa.Durante la primera reunión de la Mesa Técnica del MNSC, se definieron los \"valores\" desde los que se considera debe trabajar el SMHN, tal y como se muestra en la Figura 5. A través de grupos focales se trabajó una propuesta por sector para la nueva Visión de los SMHN. En plenaria se llegó a una propuesta de Visión, a saber:\"El Instituto Nacional de Sismología, Vulcanología, Meteorología e Hidrología de Guatemala (INSIVUMEH), garantizamos la colecta y sistematización de datos meteorológicos y climáticos de acuerdo con estándares internacionales. Facilitamos datos de acceso libre, para la generación de información oportuna promoviendo la inclusión social y cultural, y nos posicionamos como un ente técnico-científico que promueve la colaboración multisectorial para contribuir al desarrollo planificado del gobierno. Para el año 2033, el Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos de Guatemala (MNSC), liderado por el INSIVUMEH y apoyado por las diversas instituciones del país, promueve proactivamente la prestación de servicios climáticos e hidrológicos, adoptando un enfoque multisectorial y regulatorio que impulsa la estandarización, difusión y gestión integral de la información. El MNSC opera bajo los principios de responsabilidad, transparencia e integridad, fortaleciendo las capacidades técnicas en el monitoreo y cobertura de redes de hídricas y meteorológicas, proporcionando datos e información útil y oportuna basada en estándares nacionales e internacionales, a través de una plataforma colaborativa.\"Sin embargo, se acordó que aún debe trabajarse más ya que desean que se visualicen otros enfoques desde la integralidad y del trabajo multidisciplinario a realizar por lo que está será validada en la próxima reunión de la Mesa Técnica del MNSC, a realizarse en el año 2024.El desarrollo del paso 2 del Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos, se fundamentó en procesos de consulta para identificar las fortalezas, oportunidades, debilidades y amenazas del accionar del SHMN de Guatemala, así cómo los factores de entorno (i.e., políticos, económicos, sociales, tecnológicos, legales y ambientales). Con los insumos recopilados se procederá a elaborar un documento extendido para consolidar el paso 2.Para el próximo año se espera avanzar en el paso 3 el cual plantea la elaboración de un plan estratégico nacional y uno de acción con referencia de los costos para la creación de un Marco Nacional de Servicios Climáticos y el Paso 4 que contempla respaldar el plan estratégico y uno de acción con el detalle de los costos y con plazos definidos para la ejecución del MNSC.Anexo 1. Actores participantes del proceso de consultaEl taller nacional de consultas de las partes interesadas, correspondiente al desarrollo del paso 2 del MNSC, se desarrolló el 12 y 13 de julio de 2023, con una participación de 73 personas de 47 instituciones.INSIVUMEH, comparte una estadística sobre la participación del taller en la Figura a continuación. Anexo 2. Registro fotográfico del taller de consultas de las partes interesadas"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4419384859.json b/main/part_2/4419384859.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef93213203d8683f9672429647f8b2f4f31f11e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4419384859.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d2583f54a8902e61c27db275d5dc3c3a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e0b19e76-b95c-4418-89fe-0af6bacdf25b/retrieve","id":"854588798"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"44e6eb1c-39a6-4585-a2c6-3817537b848a","content":"Y MERCADO EN EL SALVADOR, NOV/DIC. 1988 Porien van Herpen, CIAT* Maribe~ de Po~io, CENTA** Noviembre 1991 AGRADECIMIENTOS La realización del presente estudio de aceptabilidad únicamente fue posible gracias a la participación de muchas personas de CENTA y ClAT. En primer lugar agradecemos a Ada Ma~eny de Payes y Ana Mirian Monterrosa, quienes hicieron un trabajo estupendo en las encuestas con los consumidores urbanos. Wenceslao Moreno Ramirez (CENTA, región San Miguel) y Germán Raúl Henriquez con su equipo (CENTA, región San Vicente) tomaron la dificil responsabilidad de realizar encuestas con las mujeres en las areas rurales. También agradecemos a Carlos Atilio Perez quien fue de gran ayuda en la organización del estudio y quien suministró cantidades grandes de frijol sin las cuales el estudio únicamente hubiera podido realizarse por una parte.Abelardo viana participó con mucha efectividad durante la primera semana para iniciar el estudio del mercado. También agradecemos a Regina Belloso y Armando Mendoza del departamento de validación de CENTA por su participación en el estudio del mercado. Agradecimientos especiales para el lng. Bruno por el apoyo logistico en el estudio de consumo urbano, y para lng. Macia quien nos aseguró ayuda personal y un vehiculo para el estudio de mercado.La introducción éxitosa de una nueva variedad de frijol depende de una cadena de decisiones tomadas por personas con diferentes intereses. En el primer lugar el agricultor y su familia evaluan una variedad de frijol tanto en sus aspectos agronómicos, como económicos y culinarios (calidad del frijol). El peso que da el agricultor a cada aspecto depende de la orientación al mercado. Si la producción de frijol esta principalmente para el autoconsumo el frijol será evaluado por su compartamiento en el campo y la calidad de consumo. Al contrario, si la producción de frijol está orientada hacia el mercado, el agricultor acepta o rechaza una nueva variedad basandose en las ganancias monetarias. En el segundo eslabón de la cadena está el comerciante que determina en base del desempeño en el mercado si un frijol nuevo tendrá éxito. El comerciante (como el agricultor) evalua las características agronómicas, económicas y culinarias de una variedad. Por ejemplo él prefiere comprar un frijol que es precoz (da mejor precio), y que se puede almacenar sin que la calidad del grano disminuya. Además compra preferiblemente un frijol conocido y apreciado por su clientela. La cantidad de frijol que puede comprar en una sola transacción, la forma de pago, la posibilidad de credito son otros ejemplos de decisiones en que se puede fundar el comerciante. El Consumidor es el tercer y ultimo eslabón en la cadena de decisiones. El no se interesa por las caracteristicas agronomicas del frijol. El decide aceptar o rechazar un frijol en ,base de la calidad del grano, su precio y disponibilidad en el mercado. La decisión final esta influida por el ingreso de la familia, los habitos de compra, preparación y consumo de frijol. Por ejemplo el consumidor en los estratos altos tiene suficiente presupuesto para comprar el frijol que prefiere, mientras que el consumidor en los estratos bajos debe contentarse con el frijol de menor calidad y menor precio. otro ejemplo es que donde se remoja el frijol y se usa olla a presión no se da mucha importancia al tiempo de cocción. También es importante tomar en cuenta que la calidad del frijol depende del tiempo del almacenamiento y de el manejo posterior de la cosecha. A menudo, un frijol guardado tiene problemas de gorqogo. si no se hace un tratamiento contra este insecto, parte del frijol se pierde y la calidad baja considerablemente. Si se aplica una insecticida el frijol se vuelve duro y pierde sabor.Una nueva variedad de frijol solamente será aceptada cuando la mayoria de los agricultores, comerciantes y consumidores opinen que el nuevo fr1jol les ofrece algo mejor o por 10 menos igual al frijol que más producen, venden, compran y comen. En consecuencia, es esencial conocer las opiniones y actitudes que rigen en cada eslabón para poder decidir sobre la liberación de una nueva variedad.Para conocer estos factores CENTA y CIAT elaboraron un estudio con el objetivo de establecer los requerimientos del tipo de grano de frijol para que éste aceptado al nivél del mercado y el consumo en El Salvador. Además se quiso evaluar dos variedades mejoradas (CENTA IZALeO y/o CENTA JOBOA) y liberadas en comparación con el frijol más común (ROJO DE SEDA.El aspecto agronómico ha quedado fuera del enfoque del estudio, porque estudios de adopción de variedades de frijol k.mejoradas considerando el compan:amiento en el campo, ya existen.En El Salvador el frijol pequeño de color rojo es el grano más producido y preferido. Sin embargo las diferencias regionales son bastante grandes. En el centro del pais el frijol más común es ROJO DE SEDA (un grano pequeño, alongado/arriñonado, un poco aplanado, de color rojo claro inclinando hacia cafe). En las fronteras con Honduras y Guatemala la influencia de dichos paises es notoria en el sentido que una preferencia existe por los frijoles rojos oscuros (SAN'GRETORO, TIHECO) y que el consumo de granos negros (TIHECO, TALETE COLOCHO Y MONO) es común. Dentro de una region los patrones de consumo de frijol son diferentes entre areas rurales y urbanas y también entre consumidores y productores de frij 01. El consumo rural es mas alto que el consumo urbano.Los datos del estudio estiman un consumo anual per cap ita de 23 kilos en las áreas rurales y de 15 kilos en las áreas urbanas.Además el productor de frijol consume principalmente la variedad que produce, mientras el consumidor generalmente puede escoger entre diferentes granos.El consumidor depende para su consumo completamente del mercado, mientras que el consumo del agricultor depende mas de su producción.El consumo en las ciudades regionales es diferente a los patrones de consumo en la capital (San Salvador) ya que la oferta en el mercado de una ciudad pequeña depende de la producción regional y que los habitos de consumo son basados en la tradición de la región.La ultima diferencia que existe en los patrones de consumo es entre los qrupos socio-económicos. El frijol es relativamente más importante para el consumidor de bajos recursos tanto en términos de nutrición como de presupuesto. A menudo l él debe contentarse con frijoles baratos de menor calidad.Un estudio de consumo y comercio necesita obligatoriamente considerar consumidores de diferentes grados de urbanización e ingreso, además de autoconsumidores y comerciántes. Estas consideraciones se tomaron en cuenta en el diseño de la metodologia del estudio.1.11:1:. METODOLOGrA Se recogió información sobre aceptabilidad. por medio de entrevistas en areas rurales y urbanas con consumidores de diferentes grupos de ingreso y con comerciantes en diferentes escalones del mercado. Durante las encuestas con los comerciantes y los consumidores rurales se hizó una evaluación visual de CENTA IZALeO y CENTA JIBOA basados en muestras de frijol.Durante las encuestas con los consumidores urbanos se entregaron muestras de CENTA IZALeO, CENTA JIBOA y ROJO DE SEDA para una evaluación de su facilidad de preparación y su aceptabilidad en el plato. CUatro semanas después de la entrevista se volvió a estas familias para recoger el formulario de evaluación.Se realizó el estudio urbano en San Salvador y en tres ciudades intermedias: respecto al tipo de grano en el este del pais se escogió a San Miguel (cerca de la frontera con Honduras); San región central de El Salvador vicente fue seleccionado para representar la y Santa Ana fue elegido para el parte oeste I (cerca de la frontera con Guatemala).Para el estudio de consumo rural se escogieron dos zonas donde CENTA-IZALCO y CENTA-JIBOA habían sido evaluados agronómicamente: San Miguel (en el este del país) y San Vicente (en el centro).Las encuestas se realizaron en las dos ültimas semanas de Noviembre y las dos primeras semanas de Diciembre 1988. Esta época fue elegida por la disponibilidad de suficientes cantidades de semilla de CENTA IZALeO, CENTA JIBOA y ROJO DE \",', SEDA para distribuir entre los consumidores urbanos. En la segunda y tercera semana de enero 1989 se recogió los formularios con las evaluaciones de las muestras. La entrevista se realizó con amas de casa, como personas responsables por la comida y las c,,¡mpras.La entrevista cubrió los siguientes factores que pueden influir la aceptabilidad de un tipo de grano especifico. Además la encuesta cubrió aspectos del mercado de frijol como la disponibilidad, la selección del sitio de compra y los precios. Finalmente habia un número de preguntas sobre la situación familiar, que cubrieron los hábitos de compra, preparación y consumo de frijol, el ingreso per cap ita y el tamaño de la familia.En el caso de que la familia hubiese recibido frijoles para evaluación de preparación y consumo, el ama de casa pudo preparar las diferentes muestras según su costumbre y después debió llenar un formato de evaluación por cada una de las muestras. El formulario se recogió un mes después de haber entregado las muestras.Se hicieron entrevistas con familias rurales y productores de frijol alrededor de San Vicente (53) y San Miguel (30). \"Se entrevistaron únicamente familias campesinas que habian participado en ensayos experimentales con CENTA IZALCO y/o CEN'l'A JOBOA, y que por lo tanto conocian las propiedades agronómicas de estos materiales.Literatura sobre la participación femenina en las actividades agricolas menciona que, aunque la mujer no siempre participa en las actividades agricolas y del mercado, generalmente sabe lo que pasa en la finca. Ya que la mujer es además responsable por la comida se entrevistó al ama de casa sobre los factores que influyen la aceptabilidad de un frijol nuev e os estraW$ ruto.> cue an el inJOl menos uecue;.,¡;;me¡;¡e que ¡\"S ~amilias de ingresos bajos (cuadro 38). Las familias ricas tienen menos necesisidad de colar el frijol porque compran por lo general frijoles más frescos (véase parágrafo m.lV) que las familias de menor ingreso.Cuadro 38: Hábitos de preparación de frijol según ingreso. El Salvador, áreas urbanas, 1988. (% de las familias). Más de 90% de las familias expresa una preferencia para un color especifico del frijol seco (Cuadro 39). Sin embargo -como veremos más adelante en este parágrafoúnicamente 30% de las familias descartan un frijol cuando no tiene el color preferido.Cuadro 39: Preierencia para d <-o1o/' BARI Gom23 (48.2 g) > BARI Gom21 (45.2 g) > BARI Gom18 (44.3 g) > BARI Gom19 (44.0 g) > BARI Gom26 (43.1 g) > Akbar (40.5 g) > Agrani (39.2 g) > BARI Gom22 (37.3 g) > BARI Gom20 (36.1 g) > BARI Gom25 (34.9 g) > Kanchan (32.6 g)Figure 1 shows variations in TDM at anthesis and in postanthesis changes of TDM. Generally high yielding cultivars (e.g. BARI Gom24, BARI Gom23, etc.) exhibited higher TDM at anthesis compared to the low yielding cultivars (e.g. Kanchan, Agrani, BARI Gom20 etc.). Almost all the cultivars showed gradual increase in TDM from anthesis until 14-28 after anthesis (DAA) followed by showing more or less unchanged patterns towards the maturity. The cultivars also showed variations in changes of culm dry weight during the grain filling period. Increase in culm dry weight indicates the accumulation of culm reserves and the decrease in weight indicates the remobilization of reserves to the grain. Generally, culm dry weights increased from anthesis to 14 DAA followed by the decreasing trend towards maturity in almost all culti- IJOART vars. Generally, high yielding cultivars (e.g. BARI Gom24, BARI Gom23, etc.) exhibited higher culm dry mass at anthesis compared to the low yielding ones (e.g. Kanchan, Agrani, BA-RI Gom20 etc.). The variations in the pattern of accumulation and remobilization of culm reserves also existed among the cultivars. The cultivars exhibited variations in changes of spike dry weights. The changes in spike dry weight indicate the changes in grain dry weight in a spike. The spike dry weight increased from anthesis towards maturity in all cultivars. In general, high yielding cultivars (e.g. BARI Gom24, BARI Gom23, BARI Gom26, etc.) possessed sharper increasing trends compared to the low yielding ones (e.g. Kanchan, Agrani, BARI Gom20 etc.).The leaf greenness of flag leaves evaluated by SPAD readings is shown in the Figure 2. The SDAD reading was about 40 in almost all cultivars at anthesis. However the cultivars exhibited variations in changing pattern of SPAD reading during grain filling period. In general, high yielding cultivars (e.g. BARI Gom24, BARI Gom18, BARI Gom21, etc.) retained leaf greenness longer time (up to 14-21 DAA) than in low yielding cultivars (e.g. Kanchan, BARI Gom18 Agrani, BARI Gom20 etc.). Usually, low yielding cultivars exhibited the sharper declining trends in SPAD readings from anthesis towards maturityFigure 3 shows the changes in water-soluble carbohydrates (WSCs) in culms at anthesis, milk ripe and maturity of twelve wheat cultivars. There were large variations in the content of WSCs in culm at different times during grain filling. The increase in WSCs content in culm shows post-anthesis accumulation of culm reserves and the decrease in WSCs contents shows the remobilization of the reserves to the grains. The WSCs content at anthesis varied from 51 to 148 mg g−1 culm dry mass. The WSCs content at milk ripe stage varied from 54 to 228 mg g−1 culm dry mass. The highest value of WSCs content was recorded in BARI Gom24 and lowest value in Akbar.In general, high yielding cultivars possessed higher WSCs content at milk ripe compared to low yielding cultivars. The cultivars also exhibited large variations in the residual WSCs content in culm at maturity. The residual WSCs in culm ranged from 3 to138 mg g−1 culm dry mass. The highest value was recorded in BARI Gom23 and lowest in BARI Gom26.Wheat cultivars used in this experiment exhibited significant variations in grain yield and yield attributes (Table 1). Grain yield in wheat is determined by 3 yield components-number of spikes per m−2, number of grains spike−1 and 1000-grain weight. Though all the components showed significant variations in F test, the higher F value indicates that grain weight is the most important components for the variations in grain yield. (Table 1). Grain weight is determined during the grain filling period, the period between anthesis and physiological maturity (Sharma, 1994). Grain filling is the accumulation of assimilates in grains during the grain filling (Austin et al., 1980). The assimilates for grain filling come from current photosynthesis and stored reserves in culm (Austin et al., 1980;Schnyder, 1993;Hossain et al., 2011).The difference in grain filling among the cultivars could be accounted for by the difference in post-anthesis carbon assimilation and culm reserves remobilized to grains (Takahashi et al., 1993;Hossain et al., 2009). Carbon assimilation can be monitored by the changes in total dry mass (Hossain et al., 2009). The high yielding cultivars usually exhibited greater accumulation of TDM compared to low yielding ones (Figure 1). Moreover, high yielding cultivars had the ability to retain leaf greenness for longer time after anthesis compared to low yielders. These results indicate that high yielder usually contributed more to fill the grain through current assimilation compared to the low yielders (Takahashi et al., 2004;Hossain et al, 2009).The culm reserves play a vital role in buffering grain yield when current assimilation is restricted as senescence (Takahashi and Kanazawa, 1996;Tahir and Nakata, 2005;Ehdaie et al., 2006Ehdaie et al., , 2008)). The culm elongates and stores water-soluble carbohydrates (WSCs) during initial and early period of grain filling (from anthesis to milk ripe, at around 14 DAA) and they are subsequently remobilized to grains during the late and final period (from milk ripe to maturity) (Takahashi et al., 1993). There were wide variations in the Grain filling is an important process, which determines the final grain weight, a major component of grain yield in wheat. The smaller grain weight as a result of poor grain filling, sometimes, becomes a major constraint for wheat production. Contribution of culm reserves is also an important factor for determining grain yield. There were large variations in the content of WSCs in culm at different times during grain filling.In general, high yielding cultivars possessed higher WSCs content at milk ripe compared to low yielding ones. The cultivars also exhibited large variations in the residual WSCs content in culm at maturity and during remobilization of culm WSCs to grains. The contribution, in general, was higher in high yielders compared to low yielders. It may be concluded that the grain weight is most important factor causing large variations in grain yield among wheat cultivars grown in Bangladesh. Both the current assimilation and remobilized culm reserves are attributable to the grain weight. High yielding cultivars especially BARI Gom24, BARI Gom23, BARI Gom26, BARI Gom19 have the higher potentiality to buffer grain yield under limited current assimilation as they can store higher amount of WSCs in culm. IJOART"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4541491605.json b/main/part_2/4541491605.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8603d4b22c61b01ae9d2d0615b35058b050e57a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4541491605.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4fd0b70a29e2b6132b319b49daac328d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d929e4b9-40e3-4d8a-b025-f0883492f6e6/retrieve","id":"2014115098"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c5720b74-896a-4d29-80a8-622dc201f703","content":"• Food safety is and remains a burning issue in Vietnam• Food safety is of great concern to both consumers and policymakers and frequently appears in the media An initiative to bring together key government agencies, line ministries and development partners• Joint policy dialogue and discussions on food safety "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4559195299.json b/main/part_2/4559195299.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06c703405aeeb6c2be664775894795e156ee4498 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4559195299.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"516477d403be4848fdfb9c054f9707a2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b7a191e9-7652-45ae-9fb4-3c45f1520abe/retrieve","id":"-1662673929"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1ca950b3-08b4-4d3e-a9f2-9f331ab5078d","content":"A brand is not a logo. A brand is not a name. A brand is not a trademark, symbol or jingle A brand exists only in the minds of your stakeholders A brand is the sum total of all the impressions a stakeholder has, based on every interaction they have had with you, your organisation and your product/service Endowing a product or service with the power of the brand Communications office at the TAAT ClearingHouse officially began on the 3 rd of September 2018.Implementing Agency, Partners and CGs have been carrying out communication activities for about 12 months.Coherence, strategic focus and integration urgently required.Communication should therefore become a strategic tool to drive TAAT's mission and objectives within the framework of the \"Feed Africa Strategy\".Technologies for African Agricultural Transformation (TAAT)CURRENT SITUATIONA communication's strategy develops from an organisation's uniqueness and from identity-shaping practices, maintained over time, that lead stakeholders to perceive the organisation as credible, reliable, responsible and trustworthy.A favorable reputation therefore requires more than just an effective communication effort reinforced by an updated strategy; it requires an admirable identity that can be molded through consistent performance, usually over many years.Technologies for African Agricultural Transformation (TAAT) Positively impact TAAT's mission by continually communicating the relevance of that mission and propagating information on TAAT's activities and initiatives in ways that: Technologies for African Agricultural Transformation (TAAT)• Well defined and focused messages • .• Functional contact data base to support information exchange • .• Reinforcement of existing partnerships and building of new partnerships • .. Technologies for African Agricultural Transformation (TAAT)The overall goal is to give tactical support to achieving TAAT's objectives using strategic communication and reputation management tools. A communications strategy develops from an organisation's uniqueness and from identityshaping practices, maintained over time, that lead stakeholders to perceive the organisation as credible, reliable, responsible and trustworthy. Best regarded organisations achieve their reputations by implementing systematically, a communications strategy. They adhere rigorously to practices that consistently and reliably produce decisions that the rest of us approve of and respect. By increasing faith and confidence in the organisation's actions, credibility and reliability, they create economic value. A favourable reputation therefore requires more than just an effective communication effort; it requires an admirable identity that can be moulded through consistent performance, usually over many years."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4571874043.json b/main/part_2/4571874043.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..617503fe1774e5a30a277e192738a4b47e592352 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4571874043.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d07442efe9f3ec943d570717b1f607e4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/44854931-8e04-4a96-b53f-9ca696728697/retrieve","id":"-108971431"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4b503b08-78d6-4181-bd79-5202a8332d54","content":"International conference on Sustainable Animal Agricultural for Developing Countries (SAADC 2023) ILRI session: interdisciplinary approaches to support food safety, market access, genetic improvements, and climate change in livestock Vientiane, Lao PDR,• Smallholder Chicken Production system in SEA: Opportunity "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4572297339.json b/main/part_2/4572297339.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c1e633626ec30fa5db59f9e6dfd1b9044d364a22 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4572297339.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7412c854e7ac356908a36d9f079428b9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8f1793c9-eb7c-423b-97c0-89d763d9e18e/retrieve","id":"-328806749"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ec3c027f-9748-4bdf-9081-322a48ed1928","content":"Investments in the livestock sector can significantly contribute to economic growth, poverty reduction and the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals in Africa.• Targeted investments to assist small livestock producers, rather than 'marginal' livestock keepers, can cost-effectively support enhancements in livestock productivity and result in economic growth and poverty reduction through a variety of pathways.• Promoting intra-regional trade of livestock products, based on countries' or regions' comparative advantages, is critical to create remunerative and sizeable markets for small livestock producers, and to ensure a sustainable, market-driven development of the livestock sector.Livestock in the macro-economy 2Livestock in the household economy 2Demand for Animal Products 4Supply of Animal Products 5Small livestock producers and intra-regional trade as key drivers of livestock sector growth 6Conclusions 6The livestock sector could play an important role in the process of economic development of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, due to policy neglect, the sector is only marginally contributing to economic growth and poverty reduction and, in general, to the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals. This note provides evidence that public and private sector investments in the livestock sector can generate handsome returns in terms of economic growth and poverty reduction, provided that (i) they are targeted to assist small livestock producers in enhancing livestock productivity rather than attempting to support the vast array of marginal livestock keepers 1 , and (ii) they focus on promoting intra-African trade of live animals and livestock products, rather than attempting to penetrate high-value international markets.The livestock sector contributes between 20 to 50 percent to agricultural valued added in African countries -with a continental average of 26 percent -and is expected to become the largest contributor to agriculture as economic development progresses because of a growing demand for high-value food items, including meat and dairy products. In industrialized economies, the livestock sector accounts for about 1/2 of agricultural GDP (FAOSTAT, 2011).1 Small livestock producers are here defined as those farmers that have sufficient skills and resources which, when appropriate policies and institutions are in place, enable them to produce and sell surpluses of meat and dairy products. Marginal livestock keepers are those household that have an insufficient critical mass of assets to regularly produce a surplus from their livestock, and for whom labour is the main asset.In developing countries, including the African economies, the contribution of livestock to agriculture, and to the economy in general, is underestimated. Estimates of livestock GDP typically account for the value of production, but not for that of other services provided by livestocksuch as hauling, draft power and insurance and savings. These services are of high value, particularly in developing countries where only a minority of farmers are specialized livestock producers. Behnke (2010), for instance, calculates that the contribution of livestock to the Ethiopian GDP should be increased by about 30 percent if the value of hauling services provided by farm animals is considered.Furthermore, the secondary benefits of livestock production along the value chain and associated employment generation are generally overlooked. Roland-Holst et al. (in FAO, forthcoming) estimate that in sub-Saharan Africa livestock sector multipliers -as measured by the incremental effect of $1 additional spending on aggregate national household incomes -average $2.9 in primary livestock production and $5.9 in processing. In addition, whilst livestock is in most countries a stronger a stimulus for economic growth than crops, fruits and vegetables, manufacturing and service sectors, the benefits of livestock sector growth are usually more equally distributed because of a web of indirect linkages across distribution, processing and marketing activities.In a retrospective analysis, Pica et al. (2008) find a statistically significant causal relationship between livestock sector development and economic growth in 18 of the 20 African countries analyzed, strongly suggesting that increases in value-added per Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) are a driver of GDP per capita growth. In general, increased agricultural productivity, including livestock, is anticipated to lower food prices, which directly benefits the poor and generates a surplus of products and factors that can be exported from agriculture to the rest of the economy, thereby facilitating economic growth and poverty reduction (e.g. Tiffin and Irtz, 2006). Livestock are major source of subsistence for rural households, as they represent a source of food, income, manure, draught power and hauling services, savings and insurance and social capital (Moll, 2005). However, mean household herd size ranges between 1 and 2 TLU (FAO, forthcoming) and livestock usually only contribute marginally to household income (Table 1).* Only livestock keeping households; + Only cattle; # Quoted in Bekure (1983) The fact that a majority of households keep some livestock but that farm animals contribute relatively little to their income suggests that it is unfeasible for all African livestock keepers to specialize in livestock farming and use their farm animals to escape poverty.• While the distribution of entrepreneurial skills among the population depends on a variety of factors, available cross-country data consistently show that as economies grow more people are employees (in industrialized countries economies only about 10 to 15 percent of the population is self-employed), i.e. it is unlikely that all livestock keepers would be willing or able to set up profitable livestock farms (ILO, 2011).Even if all livestock keepers became successful livestock producers, input costs would increase and output prices would drop reducing the profitability of livestock farming, i.e. in this scenario livestock could not be the main source of livelihoods for the majority of rural households (Baghwati, 1958).The majority of livestock keepers in Africa can be defined as 'marginal livestock keepers', i.e. they have an insufficient critical mass of assets to regularly produce a surplus from their livestock, and their non-farm activities do not allow them to rely on market purchases for adequate food intake. Labour is their main asset, and the generation of employment opportunities in rural areas is thus the most common path out of poverty for them (Upton and Otte, 2004).Only a minority of livestock keepers can be defined as 'small livestock producers', i.e. they have skills and resources that, when appropriate policies and institutions are in place, would enable them to become successful entrepreneurs, i.e. to produce and sell surpluses of meat and dairy products, generate employment opportunities for the poor(er), because livestock activities throughout the supply chain are intensive in unskilled labour 2 , and, ultimately, contribute to an inclusive growth of livestock, and of the economy in general 3 .There are opportunities for small livestock producers to establish profitable livestock enterprises, because of the large increase in the demand for animal products in the African continent, due to the combined effect of population expansion, the high rate of urban growth and accompanying changes in lifestyles, and increases in real household incomes. Over the period 1990 to 2007, for instance, meat and milk food consumption in Africa have increased by 2.9 and 3.0 percent per year (+5,861 MT and +14,962 MT respectively), and similar rates of growth are anticipated in the next decades for all meat and dairy products. 2 For instance, the overall number of full-time jobs created per 100 liters of milk traded vary from 3.7 in Kenya to over 17 in Ghana (Omore, 2002); in Burkina Faso, traditional livestock marketing channels are estimated to provide employment for about 60,000 full-time workers (FAO/CDI, 2003).3 It is not possible to identify quantitative parameters to define small livestock farmers, as the profitability of livestock farming is not only dependent on household assets and skills but also on the context in which the household operates, which differs from country to country and, within country, from regions to regions.The anticipated growth in the demand for animal source food, however, seems to primarily driven by population growth -rather than urbanization or gains in real per capita income -as the per-capita consumption for livestock products is estimated to marginally increase in absolute terms in the next coming decades. In SSA as a whole, for instance, beef, milk, goat & sheep meat and poultry percapita consumption will increase by -0.1, 2.2, 0.4 and 0.7 kg over the period 2000-2030, according to data provided by FAO (see Fig. 2 to Fig 5).In the next years, majority of African consumers will therefore continue to demand relatively low-value minimally processed food items, as the average per-capita income of African countries will not allow the typical household to shift his consumption towards high-value livestock products which satisfy high-income countries' safety and quality attributes 4 . This represents a good opportunity to improve the incomes and livelihoods of small livestock producers (and other actors along the value chain) who, in the short to medium term, are not in a position to provide food items satisfying stringent quality and safety standards, such as those of OECD countries.Increases in consumption of animal food have been so far satisfied by national production as well as by increased imports. However, African livestock farmers have increased their supply of animal food mainly through expanding herd size rather than through enhancing productivity (efficiency). For example, over the period 1990 to 2009, about 96 percent of the increased beef supply could be explained by increased stock numbers; the proportion is 82 percent for milk; 89 percent for poultry, and 98 percent for sheep and goat meat. In the same two decades, net imports of meat and milk have grown from 379 to 1,442 MT, and from 4,127 to 5,763 MT respectively (FAOSTAT, 2011).Estimates also indicate that between 2000 and 2030 African livestock producers will be increasingly unable to satisfy the growing demand for animal food, with the net trade balance for both meat and dairy products worsening over time, increasing the outflow of domestic currencies. Intra-regional trade, in fact, accounts for less than 10 percent of African trade because, to a large extent, people in sub-Saharan African live in the interior of the continent and face high transport costs in shipping goods between the inland and coastal areas. As a result, that trade is mainly between the coast and non-African countries 5 (Sachs et al., 2004;UNCTAD, 2009). In addition, because of the difficulties in complying with international sanitary and phitosanitary standard requirements, few African countries are net exporters of live animals and livestock products internationally.The above review suggests that a twin-track strategy targeting small livestock producers and favouring intra-regional trade of livestock and livestock products represents a promising way to support livestock sector development, while at the same time promoting economic growth and reducing poverty levels.Targeted public and private investments to assist small livestock producers in enhancing their productivity by tapping into their resources and entrepreneurial skills will favour (i) larger supply of affordably animal source foods (which translates in gains in real per capita income of population), (ii) employment generation along the value chain, and (iii) labour market growth in non-livestock sectors. Investments should attempt to remove the most binding constraints which prevent livestock producers from being efficient and generating surpluses of meat and dairy products (e.g. animal diseases and limited access to feed and water for animals) that satisfy the quality and safety standards demanded by African consumers, which are different from the SPS standards necessary to export in industrialized food markets. At the same time, investments that support marginal livestock keepers should not be disregarded, but aim at reducing vulnerability and increasing food security rather than at supporting a sustainable, market driven growth of livestock.Livestock farmers have incentives to increase livestock production and productivity only when they have access to remunerative markets. Given that only 15 out of 53 countries in Africa have a population of over 20 million, and 28 countries have a population of less than 10 million people (FAOSTAT, 2011), most countries do not have sufficiently large internal markets to develop their own livestock industry. The development of intraregional African markets is thus a pre-condition for supporting the development of the livestock sector and, in many circumstances, areas and countries which have some comparative advantage in livestock production, such as arid and semi-arid areas, are not densely populated, whilst demand hotpots for livestock products are located in areas where livestock production is not easily feasible, such as in humid and sub-humid coastal areas. For example, Southern COMESA countries have comparative advantages in growing fruits and vegetables vis-à-vis Northern COMESA countries, which instead have comparative advantages in livestock production (Dimaran et al., 2009); analysis of the physical trade flows in the West Africa shows interdependence between the Sahelian countries and those of the coast: cereals and starchy products move northwards from the coastal countries, while of animal products move in the opposite direction (OECD, 2008).Livestock sector development can contribute to economic growth and poverty reduction in Africa, as macroeconomic and microeconomic evidence shows. At the same time, both supply side and demand side factors currently provide good opportunities for sector growth. Targeted public and private sector investments are needed to fully exploit the potential of the livestock sector to support economic development, which should focus on small livestock producers, those who are able to establish remunerative livestock enterprises, supply affordably priced animal food to a growing (urban) population, and generate employment opportunities along the value chain for others. At the same time, facilitating intra-regional trade based on the comparative advantages of African countries and Regional Economic Communities is necessary to create remunerative and sizeable markets for livestock producers and match animal food supply and demand, which ensures a market-driven and sustainable development of the livestock sector."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4586541817.json b/main/part_2/4586541817.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b1095888721036f1509da59920fcfbcd8e3325f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4586541817.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"35b03486be8cdcc240f197c2dbe27922","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/747c5c64-6bea-42b2-9643-93e941e09dac/retrieve","id":"1828384541"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6e7a2532-6dd7-4af8-9cbe-6a0ced9a374f","content":"Les systèmes pastoraux font vivre des dizaines de millions de personnes dans des milieux difficiles qui se prêtent peu à d'autres utilisations des sols. En Afrique, les éleveurs occupent plus de 40 % des terres émergées et contribuent pour 10 à 44 % au PIB des pays où ils vivent. Ils fournissent une grande part du lait et de la viande consommés sur le continent -en Afrique de l'Est, jusqu'à 90 % de la viande consommée provient des troupeaux pastoraux. La contribution globale du pastoralisme au patrimoine culturel, à la biodiversité et aux recettes d'exportation est substantielle. Or, les communautés pastorales se heurtent aujourd'hui à de nombreux problèmes : la croissance démographique, le changement climatique, des services sociaux et sanitaires lacunaires, une marginalisation et des conflits pour l'exploitation des terres et de l'eau. Point positif, la demande locale et internationale de produits d'origine animale est en hausse. Mais pour saisir cette opportunité, il faut améliorer l'accès aux marchés, réduire les barrières commerciales non tarifaires, renforcer les systèmes d'information sur les marchés et encourager le financement. Les pasteurs pourraient aussi accroître leurs revenus grâce à des activités contribuant à la conservation de l'environnement comme l'écotourisme et la vente de plantes médicinales, de gommes et de fruits. Lors du Briefing de Bruxelles sur le pastoralisme organisé par le CTA avec la Commission de l'Union africaine en février 2012, des experts ont présenté des mesures capables d'améliorer le bien-être des pasteurs. Il convient en effet de définir des politiques pour renforcer les économies pastorales, par exemple en facilitant l'accès des pasteurs aux marchés et en leur permettant d'accroître la valeur de leurs produits. Il faut aussi redoubler d'efforts pour les rendre plus autonomes et pour les impliquer dans l'élaboration des politiques. Les pouvoirs publics devraient augmenter leurs investissements dans les services essentiels pour les pasteurs, notamment l'éducation, les infrastructures et les technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC).ur les parcours situés près de la réserve kényane du Masai Mara, un programme de protection de l'environnement récompense les pasteurs pour leur gestion des terres. Ce modèle, suivant lequel des bergers acceptent de laisser les animaux sauvages se déplacer librement sur leurs terres, protège les pâturages et permet aux éleveurs Masai de diversifier leurs revenus. Le paiement de services écosystémiques figure parmi les initiatives envisagées pour soutenir le pastoralisme, un mode de vie ancestral qui fait face aujourd'hui à des défis gigantesques. Les pasteurs vivant sur les parcours africains sont les régisseurs de ces vastes ressources environnementales, mais nombre d'entre eux gagnent moins de 2 $ US (1,6 €) par jour. Confrontées à la variabilité climatique, à l'insécurité alimentaire, à des marchés médiocres, aux maladies du bétail, au sous-investissement et aux conflits liés aux ressources naturelles, les communautés pastorales comptent parmi les plus vulnérables au monde.Le pastoralisme est pratiqué dans toutes les régions arides d'Afrique. En l'absence de données précises, le nombre de personnes impliquées reste sujet à débat. Selon la définition appliquée, les estimations vont de 20 millions à 200 millions. De même, les chiffres varient quant à la contribution des pasteurs à l'économie. Mais d'après l'Autorité intergouvernementale sur le développement en Afrique de l'Est, le pastoralisme fournit 90 % de la viande consommée dans la région.Les stratégies de production mobile utilisées par les pasteurs apparaissent comme un moyen essentiel pour s'adapter au changement climatique. Les recherches de l'Institut international pour l'environnement et le développement (IIED) montrent que les troupeaux nomades d'Afrique de l'Ouest, d'Éthiopie et du Kenya produisent une viande en plus grande quantité et de meilleure qualité et génèrent plus de revenus par hectare que les ranchs modernes en Australie ou en Amérique. Pourtant, les communautés pastorales sont souvent considérées à tort comme des populations arriérées, certaines actions gouvernementales les incitant même à abandonner le nomadisme.En se déplaçant constamment, les bergers nomades ont appris à exploiter des zones où personne d'autre ne saurait survivre. Les communautés indigènes prospèrent en tirant parti des conditions variables des terres arides. \"Les perceptions que nous avons de leur vie archaïque ignorent le fait qu'ils se sont complètement adaptés à leur environnement\", explique le vétérinaire ougandais Pascal Pan Vuga, qui a travaillé avec les Karamojong, une tribu dont le mode de vie a été modifié par la décision des pouvoirs publics de la sédentariser. À l'instar des bergers ougandais, de nombreux pasteurs passent désormais à contrecoeur à l'agriculture sédentaire. Mais la transition ne réussit pas toujours. \"Aujourd'hui, je dois cultiver du maïs et des légumes\", témoigne le berger kényan Orumoi Evans. \"Pourtant, le pastoralisme est plus sûr que l'agriculture. On ne peut pas se fier à la météo pour les cultures alimentaires, alors que nous savons où aller pour trouver des pâturages.\"Dans certains pays, les autorités mènent une politique hostile au pastoralisme. Ailleurs, au Mali, en Mauritanie et au Niger, par exemple, elles y sont plus favorables. Mais là aussi, les bergers éprouvent des difficultés quand d'autres mesures, concernant le sol ou l'eau, ne suivent pas. Les conflits déclenchés par l'exploitation de ces deux ressources capitales se multiplient. Aussi est-il urgent de reconnaître les droits des pasteurs sur les pâturages, en leur accordant la propriété foncière des terres communales et en les dédommageant en cas d'expropriation.Le pastoralisme contribue grandement à la sécurité alimentaire et offre des solutions pour utiliser les milieux difficiles menacés par le changement climatique. Mais de nombreuses mesures sous-estiment ce potentiel et les pouvoirs publics favorisent la sédentarisation des pasteurs.L'urbanisation grandissante, et avec elle une nouvelle demande de produits d'origine animale, ouvrent aux pasteurs des marchés lucratifs. Accéder à ces marchés exige toutefois organisation, communication et formation, la façon d'intégrer les pasteurs aux chaînes de valeur modernes étant un problème central. Les champs-écoles pastoraux proposent un apprentissage interactif à des groupes de 30 à 40 pasteurs, qui se retrouvent régulièrement pour analyser les difficultés rencontrées et réfléchir à des solutions. D'autres stratégies concluantes, testées en Éthiopie et au Kenya, font intervenir des groupes d'action collective pour réduire l'illettrisme et l'innumérisme, développer le microcrédit et dispenser des formations sur la microentreprise.Proposer ces services, et d'autres encore, aux populations isolées et dispersées est compliqué. Mais les TIC peuvent jouer un rôle majeur, notamment en permettant la mise en place de téléformations par radio ou de services bancaires et d'informations sur les cours du marché par téléphone portable. D'autres applications utiles des TIC comprennent les systèmes d'information géographique (SIG) et de localisation (GPS), qui aident à suivre les déplacements des animaux et à soutenir les efforts visant à assurer le bétail. Un projet pilote lancé en 2010 au nord du Kenya a permis de réduire les écarts sur le marché de l'assurance. Ce projet débute actuellement en Éthiopie.Les experts sont nombreux à encourager la diversification. Cette solution ne semble toutefois fonctionner pleinement que quand elle inclut une certaine part d'élevage nomade. Différentes mesures fondées sur le jeu du marché encouragent un pastoralisme durable : les marchés de niche. En Mauritanie, la société laitière Tiviski compte un réseau de plus d'un millier de bergers. Elle s'est mise à la transformation en produisant, entre autres, un fromage au lait de chamelle. Plusieurs obstacles restent à surmonter : faciliter l'accès aux marchés, lever les barrières commerciales non tarifaires relatives au bétail, améliorer les systèmes d'information du marché, respecter les normes en vigueur et instaurer des mécanismes de financement.Une série d'initiatives récentes donne à espérer. Adopté en 2011, le programme-cadre de l'Union africaine en faveur du pastoralisme en Afrique est la première mesure prise à l'échelle du continent destinée à protéger et à améliorer les sources de revenu des pasteurs africains. Le plan d'action 2011-2020 de la Communauté économique des États de l'Afrique de l'Ouest (CEDEAO) consacré à l'élevage reconnaît aux pasteurs le droit de déplacer leurs troupeaux d'une région à une autre, protège leur accès à l'eau dans les régions agricoles et facilite les échanges transfrontaliers.Parmi les innovations intéressantes figure le système fourrager \"cut-and-carry\" (couper-emporter) que des bergers ont adopté en Éthiopie dans le parc national d'Awash après les violents conflits portant sur l'exploitation de vastes pâturages de première qualité et sur les points d'eau. Parce qu'on les empêchait de faire paître leurs troupeaux, certains pasteurs ont commencé à collecter du fourrage dans le parc et à le transporter pour le répartir au sein de leur communauté. En complément du pâturage sur prairies naturelles, de nombreux pasteurs nigériens font du foin et vendent le surplus aux éleveurs en zones urbaines. Confrontés à un approvisionnement en eau inadapté et à une sécheresse récurrente, les pasteurs aussi bien en Éthiopie qu'au Niger remplacent de plus en plus les bovins par des ovins, des caprins et des camélidés.Au Kenya, un programme visant à créer un réseau de marchés plus près des bergers se révèle très efficace. Au lieu de transporter le bétail sur de longues distances, les pasteurs peuvent s'y rendre à pied, vendre leurs bêtes et acheter des aliments ou d'autres intrants. Ce modèle a été adopté dans d'autres pays, où ces marchés florissants attirent des activités complémentaires (hôtels, boucheries et boutiques). À Lolkuniani dans le district de Samburu, au Kenya, 10 % de la communauté participe activement au commerce de bétail. En moyenne, 2 000 chèvres (soit 27 500 €) et des vaches (pour 10 000 €) sont vendues chaque jour de marché hebdomadaire.■ Une application pour smartphone vient d'être développée pour conseiller les riziculteurs en matière d'engrais. Mise au point par l'Institut international de recherche sur le riz (IRRI), NMRiceApp est gratuite. Rowena Castillo de l'IRRI explique que cette application conçue pour les téléphones Android vise en premier lieu les vulgarisateurs qui conseillent les agriculteurs sur l'utilisation des engrais en fonction des sites de culture.Contrairement à sa première version -un service appelé NMRiceMobile -, cette nouvelle application permet aux vulgarisateurs et aux agriculteurs d'accéder à l'information et de la traiter directement au lieu d'avoir à batailler avec des commandes vocales automatiques. L'information fournie s'appuie sur les dernières recherches de l'IRRI relatives au rendement rizicole. À l'heure actuelle, elle n'est disponible que pour le Bangladesh, l'Indonésie et les Philippines, mais il est prévu d'étendre le service à d'autres pays en développement. \"Nous travaillons également sur une application pour la gestion des cultures, qui fournira des informations relatives aux pratiques rizicoles, à l'irrigation, à la gestion des ravageurs et à la sélection des graines\", ajoute R. Castillo.dÉloCalisationKiribati achète actuellement des terres sur l'île principale des Fidji, anticipant à long terme la montée des eaux. Le Président Anote Tong explique qu'à ce stade l'achat de 25 km² à Viti Levu constitue un investissement. \"La délocalisation est notre dernier recours\", précise-t-il. Les 33 îles et atolls de Kiribati se trouvent pour le moment à 2 m au-dessus du niveau de la mer, mais des marées de plus en plus hautes risquent de submerger une partie de cette nation du Pacifique. Les cocotiers, principale culture vivrière de Kiribati, sont menacés par l'avancée de la mer et par la sécheresse, et l'intrusion d'eau de mer dans les puits a déjà causé des pénuries d'eau potable.■ Les Mauriciens ne savaient que faire des centaines de milliers de tonnes de déchets ménagers qui s'entassaient dans l'île. Il y a une dizaine d'années, ils ont commencé à les enfouir sous terre sur un site éloigné des habitations, au prix de millions de roupies de transport. L'île étant petite, la pollution menaçait les nappes phréatiques qui alimentent plus de la moitié de la population en eau potable. Composter ces déchets composés à 70 % de matières organiques à des fins agricoles est apparu comme une solution opportune. Le chemin a été long, mais le compost est finalement produit à grande échelle à Maurice. Au lieu d'aller vers le centre d'enfouissement, les déchets prennent la direction de l'usine Solid Waste Recycling, dans l'ouest de l'île, où ils sont triés pour enlever les objets en métal avant de recevoir une bactérie naturelle qui accélère le compostage. Les déchets sont retournés tous les sept jours pour une bonne ventilation avant d'être mis à sécher. Le compost est alors prêt à être trié mécaniquement. Après plusieurs étapes de tri, il est tamisé à 2,4 mm puis ensaché en sacs de 5 et 25 kg pour être vendu aux agriculteurs. ■ Les cultivateurs sud-africains de rooibos modifient leurs pratiques pour s'adapter à l'évolution des conditions météorologiques qui menace cette culture. Ces dernières années, l'absence récurrente de pluie entre mai et août a décimé les jeunes plants, causant des pertes massives chez les quelque 300 agriculteurs (surtout de petits exploitants) qui cultivent le rooibos pour le vendre comme thé, essentiellement à l'exportation.Pour faire face à cette menace, les cultivateurs ont planté des brise-vent formés de plantes autochtones afin de stopper l'érosion des sols. Ils ont aussi construit des systèmes de captage d'eau et utilisé des semences plutôt que de jeunes plants. \"Les semences mettent plus de temps à pousser, mais sont moins sensibles au manque de pluie\", explique Pieter Koopman, qui a perdu la moitié de sa production durant la dernière décennie. Son exploitation se trouve dans le Suid Bokkeveld, une petite région d'Afrique du Sud qui concentre toute la production mondiale de ce \"thé rouge\". Le rooibos, l'un des rares produits d'Afrique faisant l'objet d'une indication géographique, suscite une demande croissante dans le Nord, mais pousse exclusivement dans cette zone, où il s'épanouit au rythme d'hivers rigoureux et d'étés caniculaires.■ Des millions de tonnes de produits agricoles pourrissent chaque année dans les zones rurales du Mozambique, et ce à cause du manque d'infrastructures et de routes permettant de les écouler sur les marchés. Depuis quelques années, un programme spécial du gouvernement, financé par le FIDA, soutient les foires agricoles, comme alternative aux marchés traditionnels. Plus de clients participent aux foires, qui pourraient difficilement aller acheter sur les zones de production.João de Castro, chef du poste administratif de Netia dans la province de Nampula, une province riche en céréales, arachides, haricots, sésame et manioc, explique que sur les marchés traditionnels ce sont les commerçants, venus en 4x4, qui imposent leurs prix. Et les producteurs n'ont d'autre choix que d'accepter ces prix. Alors que dans les foires agricoles, qui se réunissent une fois par semaine dans un lieu déterminé, davantage de commerçants et producteurs vendent, achètent ou échangent des produits, il y a plus de concurrence. Les paysans échangent des produits agricoles contre des bicyclettes, des articles ménagers, des vêtements et des chaussures, et attirent en plus de futurs clients.Feuilles de rooibos transformées en thé Vente de produits agricoles dans une foire (province de Maputo, Mozambique) maUvaises rÉColtesdes chercheurs ghanéens affirment que la baisse de la production du cacao et du palmier à huile serait liée aux pesticides qui nuisent aux pollinisateurs. Pour favoriser le développement des insectes, les entomologistes recommandent la plantation de palmiers au milieu des champs de cacao pour accueillir leurs reproductions.aGriCUltUre ContraCtUelleDans quatre provinces du nord du Mozambique, un groupement d'organisations de la société civile mène un programme gouvernemental de promotion des marchés ruraux (PROMER) qui fournit aux paysans locaux des services et leur facilite l'accès au crédit bancaire et aux institutions de microfinance. Ce groupement associe les producteurs au marché, au moyen de \"contrats à terme\", avec la garantie de vendre leurs produits à des prix avantageux pour les deux parties (producteurs et acheteurs). L'accès au crédit est garanti par les contrats. Les principaux commerçants de la région s'engagent à acheter les céréales, les haricots et d'autres cultures, et les agriculteurs s'engagent à les produire et à les fournir aux dates convenues.■ Aux Fidji, les communautés de pêcheurs combinent approches nouvelles et pratiques ancestrales dans leur lutte pour protéger les ressources marines. Parallèlement aux traditions communautaires de gestion de la mer, elles exploitent les avancées scientifiques afin de préserver leurs moyens de subsistance.Dix villages du district de Kubulau s'impliquent dans le programme fidjien de la Wildlife Conservation Society pour créer le premier réseau de zones maritimes protégées du pays en s'appuyant sur les connaissances scientifiques. L'objectif est d'augmenter la biomasse des poissons dans le secteur pour assurer l'alimentation des communautés et conserver la biodiversité le long du littoral, en instaurant des zones où la pêche est soit interdite, soit étroitement surveillée.Le projet applique les méthodes traditionnellement en usage dans les zones marines de la région gérées à l'échelle locale -par exemple, dans les zones temporairement interdites à la pêche. Il fait aussi intervenir les connaissances scientifiques acquises en gestion écosystémique. Celle-ci considère les écosystèmes dans leur globalité, en tenant compte des interactions entre l'individu et son environnement.Une poudre contre la malnutrition L'abondance des chenilles du karité dans l'ouest du Burkina Faso apporterait une solution pour lutter contre la malnutrition. Monté par des étudiants de l'Institut 2iE à Ouagadougou, le projet Faso Prot exploite ce produit deux fois moins cher que la viande et trois fois plus riche en protéines. Le projet prévoit de fabriquer un complément alimentaire à base de poudre de chenille qui serait disponible toute l'année sur l'ensemble du pays, alors que les chenilles ne sont jusqu'ici consommées que dans certaines régions, entre juillet et septembre.Une teinture spéciale, pourpre, a été présentée aux aviculteurs kényans pour les aider à réduire les pertes dues aux attaques de faucons (responsables de 40 % des pertes de poussins élevés en plein air). mise au point dans le cadre du Programme kényan de développement du maïs (KmdP), en coordination avec le Programme de promotion des intrants agricoles, cette teinture évite aux poussins d'être repérés par les faucons dans le ciel. Les premiers bovins résultant de ce croisement ont déjà commencé à être commercialisés dans les foires agropastorales, où ils ont remporté un franc succès auprès des éleveurs. Par ailleurs ont été créés des mécanismes d'accès au crédit, aux services de l'eau et de l'énergie, pour soutenir la reconstitution du cheptel du pays, réduit par plus de 25 ans de guerre. Trouer les pièges traditionnels réduit sensiblement les prises accessoires tout en préservant les revenus des pêcheurs. C'est ce que montrent les expériences réalisées. Des pêcheurs ont confectionné des nasses traditionnelles en découpant sur les côtés, à la verticale, des rectangles de 2 à 4 cm sur 30 cm. Ces trous permettent aux juvéniles et aux espèces de taille similaire de s'échapper, mais retiennent les poissons ciblés, plus grands. Ces expériences ont été menées sur les côtes kényanes, dans le lagon d'un récif corallien très exploité. Il est apparu que cela réduisait les prises accessoires de 80 %, sans avoir d'incidence notable sur le volume de poissons ciblés, plus prisés.■ La plantation de pourpier d'Afrique, plante succulente d'Afrique du Sud qui absorbe le dioxyde de carbone en quantités considérables, crée des emplois et aide à freiner le changement climatique. À feuilles persistantes, Portulacaria afra ou \"spekboom\" en afrikaner, aussi appelé \"buisson aux éléphants\", a une capacité de piégeage du CO 2 fantastique. Cette plante absorbe aussi l'eau et la rejette dans le sol comme une éponge. Elle atteint parfois 2,5 m de haut et pousse surtout dans les zones rocailleuses et arides. Des communautés locales sont payées pour boiser de vastes zones au Cap-Oriental, où le surpâturage a causé l'érosion massive des coteaux. Le but est que ce programme gouvernemental, à terme, s'autofinance en vendant des crédits carbone.Selon les scientifiques, le maquis de spekboom peut piéger 250 tonnes de dioxyde de carbone par hectare, à un rythme de quatre tonnes par an. Sa capacité à compenser les émissions de carbone nocives équivaut à celle de la forêt subtropicale humide. or, en seulement 20 ans, 90 % des zones humides ont disparu en afrique de l'ouest. soixante-cinq pays membres de l'accord international pour la conservation des oiseaux d'eau migrateurs (aewa), dont 28 africains, ont adopté un \"plan d'action pour l'afrique\" en mai dernier.Vingt-trois projets de conservation d'espèces menacées vont bénéficier de l'aide du fonds mondial de conservation SOS (Sauvons nos espèces), à hauteur de 2,4 millions d'euros, a annoncé l'Union internationale pour la conservation de la nature (UICN). L'Afrique entre dans plus de la moitié des projets, dans une quinzaine de pays. Six projets concernent des mammifères, comme les gorilles au Cameroun dont il reste moins de 300 individus. Des espèces d'oiseaux et d'amphibiens sont également concernées. À Madagascar, la protection des grenouilles mantelles est pilotée par l'association malgache Madagasikara Voakajy, en lien avec les communautés et autorités locales. S. Ommeh a réalisé des études in vitro pour analyser la tolérance des poulets locaux à la maladie. Elle espère pouvoir procéder à une sélection génomique pour produire un \"superpoulet\" riche en viande, à rendement d'oeufs élevé, résistant à la sécheresse et à la maladie.Les poulets locaux produisent souvent peu de viande et peu d'oeufs, et sont très sensibles aux virus, tels que les maladies de Newcastle et de Gumboro. Les recherches que mène Sheila Ommeh à l'Institut international de recherche sur l'élevage à Nairobi s'accompagnent de formations en laboratoire dispensées dans le cadre du programme AWARD. S. Ommeh prévoit de soumettre son travail pour publication.■ La malnutrition est directement liée à la perte de la biodiversité agricole. C'est la conclusion d'un programme de la FAO sur les liens entre biodiversité et équilibres alimentaires. Des études montrent en effet la grande richesse et variabilité nutritionnelle des anciennes variétés locales. Ces plantes ont largement disparu au profit de quelques variétés commerciales qui dominent les grandes cultures de l'agriculture mondiale (maïs, blé, riz, pommes de terre, soja).Forte de ce constat, la FAO travaille sur un projet de recensement des variétés de fruits et légumes consommées dans le monde ; 10 000 aliments sont déjà répertoriés dans une base de données.Pour les bananes, les pommes de terre, la patate douce, le manioc, le taro, le riz, etc., les données mises à disposition par la FAO témoignent de la très grande variabilité en minéraux et en vitamines d'une variété à l'autre. Chaque variété ayant des qualités propres, c'est bien leur diversité et leur complémentarité qui est équilibrée. Pour la FAO, ce travail d'information sur la valeur nutritionnelle des aliments doit permettre de réhabiliter les variétés traditionnelles.Face à la menace que fait peser la mineuse de la canne à sucre sur le secteur sucrier de la Barbade, les autorités de l'île ont introduit Cotesia flavipes, une guêpe minuscule identifiée comme un prédateur. Responsable de la section Entomologie du ministère de l'Agriculture, Ian Gibbs explique que la présence de la mineuse sur l'île avait augmenté de façon spectaculaire ces deux à trois dernières années. Un petit laboratoire élève le prédateur naturel de ce ravageur, puis des lâchers sont réalisés dans les champs touchés. Le ministère invite les producteurs de canne à sucre barbadiens à travailler en étroite coopération avec les représentants des pouvoirs publics. Installé à Tavua, il a finalement décidé de changer de branche et de cultiver de jeunes plants pour le secteur horticole. Sans capital, M. Sami a commencé à ramasser des bols en plastique usagé où faire pousser ses premiers plants. Après deux années difficiles, il s'est adressé au ministère fidjien de l'Agriculture, qui l'a aidé à installer une petite pépinière et à acheter des plateaux en plastique adéquats. Aujourd'hui, il possède l'une des plus grandes pépinières pour fruits et légumes de la région, et approvisionne les agriculteurs de toute la Division occidentale des Fidji. M. Sami travaille dur pour satisfaire la demande, mais gagne bien plus que ce qu'il aurait jamais pu espérer tirer de la culture de canne à sucre.\"Tout miser sur la canne à sucre a été ma plus grande erreur\", témoigne-t-il. \"Je regrette de ne pas m'en être rendu compte plus tôt. Il est temps pour les agriculteurs d'abandonner la monoculture au profit d'autres perspectives agroalimentaires afin de continuer à vivre décemment de leur activité.\"Plus de 300 petits producteurs d'épices du Pacifique se sont regroupés au sein du Vanuatu Spices Network. Ces agriculteurs, qui cultivent de la vanille biologique, du gingembre, du piment, du poivre et du curcuma, sont répartis sur sept îles du Vanuatu. Ils se sont organisés avec l'aide de l'ONG Farm Support Association (FSA). Sur des exploitations de 0,3 hectare en moyenne, les producteurs procèdent à une première transformation des épices. La transformation finale est réalisée chez l'un de leurs principaux clients, Venui Vanilla, avant que les produits ne soient vendus et expédiés par bateau aux marchés haut de gamme d'Australie, de Nouvelle-Zélande et d'Europe.Une cartographie de la chaîne de valeur des pommes de terre de semence a été lancée en Éthiopie, au Kenya, en ouganda, au rwanda et en tanzanie. il s'agit d'encourager les investissements productifs pour accroître la qualité des semences. la production de pommes de terre en afrique subsaharienne a plus que doublé depuis 1994, mais les rendements restent faibles, car la qualité des semences laisse à désirer. manGUeFruit saisonnier, la mangue est très appréciée pour son goût sucré et sa forte teneur en vitamines. des recherches récentes viennent de découvrir des vertus cosmétiques au beurre obtenu à partir de l'amande du noyau. le beurre de mangue serait bienfaisant pour les peaux sèches et les cheveux cassants. Un atout de plus pour un fruit aux multiples vertus. On dirait que la communauté internationale, comme la plupart des décideurs, ne réagit que quand la crise est de grande ampleur, avec des images choc sur les écrans de télévision. Alors seulement, on sort les grands moyens, à grand frais mais souvent sans grande efficacité. Or la situation actuelle est celle, sournoise, d'une fragilité rampante. Plusieurs facteurs en sont la cause : dégradation continue des conditions d'existence des populations, forte exposition aux risques de marché et à l'instabilité des prix régionaux et internationaux, sensibilité croissante aux aléas et aux risques… Les ménages n'ont pas le temps de reconstituer leur capital avant que la prochaine crise ne survienne, et deviennent de plus en plus sensibles au plus petit choc externe. Il faut une réponse structurelle, qui aille au-delà de la grande mode du moment, la résilience, qui est certes un grand pas, mais ne sera pas suffisant. Il nous faut de grands investissements dans l'agriculture : recapitaliser les sols, développer l'irrigation, trouver les moyens d'assurer l'accès des petits producteurs à la terre et au financement des moyens de production, les connecter aux marchés. Et en vérité, c'est cela qui est dans les Programmes nationaux et régionaux d'investissement agricole (PNIA et PRIA) : mais nous manquons d'engagement, de continuité dans les efforts, de conviction que c'est possible et que c'est nous, Africains, qui allons faire nous-mêmes notre développement, pas les bailleurs de fonds. L'absence de coordination des aides, l'hétérogénéité des approches, la multiplication des structures ad hoc de gestion de projets affaiblissent les capacités nationales et régionales et retardent l'atteinte des objectifs poursuivis par les États, les institutions régionales et les partenaires internationaux.Les organisations de producteurs (OP) s'impliquent de plus en plus pour la sécurité alimentaire. Sont-elles suffisamment formées ?Dans le domaine des politiques agricoles, la quasi-totalité des revendications des OP a été prise en compte dans les orientations générales des politiques, notamment de l'ECOWAP. Les OP sont de mieux en mieux formées, avec l'appui des partenaires du Nord et du Sud. Mais il reste encore à améliorer leur capacité à s'impliquer dans la négociation et la mise en oeuvre des politiques, notamment en améliorant la représentativité de leurs réseaux et donc la légitimité de leurs propositions et leur capacité à peser, et en renforçant la capitalisation interne des pratiques, initiatives et expériences des OP en lien avec l'agenda des négociations.Les exploitations familiales sont-elles la solution pour assurer la sécurité alimentaire dans la sous-région ?Couvrir les besoins alimentaires et nutritionnels d'une population en croissance forte et assurer à chacun un accès durable et stable à une alimentation diversifiée est le principal défi que doit relever la région. Un secteur agricole solide constitue la voie la plus sûre pour relever ce défi. La région considère qu'elle dispose du potentiel de production (terres, pâturages, eau, ressources humaines) qui lui permet d'assurer sa souveraineté alimentaire, en couvrant l'essentiel de ses besoins. Cependant, les conditions de mise en valeur de ce potentiel sont déterminantes pour contribuer à éliminer la faim. L'Afrique de l'Ouest dispose d'une forte population agricole et l'essentiel de la production repose sur des exploitations familiales. La reconversion dans d'autres activités économiques hors de l'agriculture est complexe, compte tenu des perspectives réduites offertes par les secteurs de l'industrie et des services. L'essentiel de l'exode des agriculteurs alimente aujourd'hui un secteur informel pléthorique, qui n'assure qu'une très faible rémunération du travail. Dans ce contexte, la modernisation des exploitations familiales est un enjeu majeur. Le développement de l'agriculture sur la base d'agro-entreprises peut éventuellement contribuer à résoudre les problèmes d'offre, mais il ne contribue que faiblement à résoudre le problème de la pauvreté qui est le facteur numéro un de l'insécurité alimentaire. Avec un marché en plein boom, les États s'intéressent de nouveau au cacao. En Côte d'Ivoire, la dérégulation est abandonnée. Dans les pays producteurs, des partenariats public-privé cherchent à doper la production et conquérir les marchés de niche. L'enjeu : mieux faire fonctionner le marché au profit des producteurs, tout en rendant la production plus durable sur le plan environnemental. Les principaux importateurs de fèves de cacao sont les pays industrialisés du Nord qui concentrent plus de 80 % de la consommation. Il existe deux marchés pour l'achat de cacao : la bourse de Londres et celle de New-York. Le marché, soumis aux rumeurs ou anticipations de ruptures de stock, mauvaise récolte, catastrophes climatiques ou politiques, est très instable et spéculatif, avec des variations de prix très importantes.Si la demande de cacao, tirée par les pays émergents, ne cesse de croître (2-3 % par an), et devrait connaître, dans les années à venir, une hausse importante, les producteurs africains de cacao ne voient pas leurs revenus augmenter en conséquence. Les Nations unies s'inquiètent de cette répartition inégale. \"Le bas niveau de revenus des producteurs constitue le principal enjeu relatif à l'économie du cacao. (...) Les prix doivent être suffisamment rémunérateurs pour les producteurs, et la production plus efficace, afin de leur garantir un revenu décent\" (Conférence 2010 des Nations unies sur le cacao).En Côte d'Ivoire, le relèvement du prix aux planteurs est un des principaux objectifs d'une réforme soutenue par le FMI et la Banque mondiale, qui veulent un assainissement du secteur. À la faveur de la stabilisation politique du pays, l'État ivoirien a ainsi décidé de revenir aux commandes de la production et la commercialisation alors Les consommateurs étant de plus en plus sensibilisés à la qualité des produits et au bien-être des producteurs, les grands groupes commercialisant des produits chocolatés se sont pliés à la certification et un nombre croissant de marques annoncent des chocolats labellisés : biologique, FairTrade/FLO, Rainforest Alliance et UTZ sont les principales certifications. Mais si les appellations se multiplientgrands crus, appellations d'origine contrôlée, cacaos certifiés biologiques, équitables, etc. -, elles demeurent l'exception : 6 % seulement de la production mondiale est certifiée biologique, 1 % équitable, et environ 1 % Rainforest Alliance. Un label \"cacao fin et aromatique\" est défini, par l'ICCO, principalement par l'origine du cacao (certains pays seulement sont éligibles) et son volume (un maximum de 5 % de la production mondiale). En Côte d'Ivoire, la réforme étatique qui est en voie d'imposer un prix garanti au producteur n'est pas vue d'un bon oeil par ceux qui pensaient que le label hollandais UTZ serait un gage suffisant de soutien au secteur. Ce dernier, qui concerne 150 000 planteurs certifiés dans le monde, dont 50 000 en Côte d'Ivoire, met l'accent sur les bonnes pratiques agricoles et environnementales et non sur la rémunération des producteurs.Mais produire du chocolat certifié n'est pas une assurance de gains supplémentaires... Les certifications sont, pour la plupart, élaborées par des acteurs du Nord, sans concertation. Elles sont souvent coûteuses et impliquent des cahiers des charges complexes à mettre en oeuvre (cf. Spore 158 : \"Certification, les coûts en question\").Les initiatives internationales d'appui au secteur cacaoyer se multiplient. Ainsi l'initiative américaine Feed the future (\"nourrir l'avenir\") a-t-elle lancé une action pour la promotion de la filière du cacao en Afrique (ACI) de 11 millions de dollars (8,94 millions d'euros) pour 13 chocolateries, en vue de développer la production de cacao en Afrique de l'Ouest ; la Fondation mondiale du cacao, créée par un groupe d'entreprises en 2000, ADM, Armajaro, Barry Callebaut, Nestlé, Cargill, etc., vise à promouvoir et coordonner le développement de la communauté du cacao.Les partenariats public-privé se développent aussi, à l'instar du lancement, fin 2011, d'un partenariat entre la multinationale américaine Cargill et l'Agence de soutien au développement rural national de la Côte d'Ivoire (Anader) apportant un investissement de 1,5 miliard FCFA (2,3 millions €) pour la formation des producteurs et la distribution de 600 000 nouveaux plants de cacao (dont l'importance est à relativiser, à l'échelle du pays -soit 400 hectares…). Mais la multiplicité de ces initiatives ne doit pas cacher l'objectif premier des firmes engagées : sécuriser leur approvisionnement en cacao, le bien-être des producteurs étant un effet induit… La recherche en première ligne À l'heure du vieillissement des plantations ivoiriennes, de la diminution des terres disponibles et du changement climatique, améliorer la productivité est une question cruciale, dont la recherche s'est saisie. Des plants hybrides apportent des gains en précocité et productivité.En novembre 2011, le lancement d'une station de recherche expérimentale en Côte d'Ivoire, d'une valeur de 5 millions de dollars (4,06 millions d'euros), a été annoncé en vue de \"rassembler les efforts de recherche du Centre national de la recherche agronomique et les efforts de recherche privée de Nestlé, pour promouvoir la production de cacao. Nestlé envisage de dépenser 81 millions d'euros pour replanter 12 millions de cacaoyers au cours des dix prochaines années, soit environ 1 million d'arbres par an. Cette implication du secteur privé, si elle a des conséquences positives, peut aussi questionner sur l'indépendance de la recherche et les motivations de ce secteur.Une étude récente du CIAT (cf. Spore 159, p. 9) indique que la hausse récente des températures devrait engendrer des chutes drastiques de la production de cacao d'ici 2030 à 2050 en Côte d'Ivoire et au Ghana. Le CIAT préconise dans son rapport certaines mesures pour l'atténuer.L'UE est le plus grand transformateur de cacao au monde, représentant plus de 40 % des broyages mondiaux.Parmi les pays développés, les Pays-Bas sont le plus grand broyeur au monde (525 000 tonnes), suivis par les États-Unis (390 000 tonnes) et l'Allemagne (385 000 tonnes).Malgré des difficultés (approvisionnement, coupures d'électricité, etc.), les pays producteurs se lancent dans la transformation : Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, etc.La Côte d'Ivoire est en bonne voie de dépasser les Pays-Bas avec un peu plus de 500 000 tonnes (40 % de la production de cacao du pays). Il convient néanmoins de noter que, sur les huit entreprises travaillant aujourd'hui dans la transformation de cacao en Côte d'Ivoire, quatre sont des filiales de multinationales européennes ou américaines : Saco (Barry Callebaut, Suisse), Unicao (ADM, États-Unis), Cargill Cocoa (États-Unis) et Cemoi (France). Cependant, de plus en plus d'entreprises ivoiriennes sont impliquées, et les activités de transformation du pays font des progrès importants.Il existe quatre entreprises au Ghana qui transforment les fèves en liqueur, poudre, beurre et gâteaux. Des investissements croissants apparaissent dans la première transformation du cacao. Barry Callebaut, grand groupe international, a récemment doublé sa capacité de transformation. Autre grande firme, Cargill s'apprête à implanter sa première usine au Ghana.Aujourd'hui, cependant, les pays africains devraient se retourner vers l'Amérique du Sud et notamment le Brésil. Ainsi Philippe Bastide, chercheur au CIRAD, de retour du premier Salon mondial du chocolat organisé dans un pays producteur, à Salvador de Bahia, cite-t-il avec enthousiasme les initiatives des producteurs brésiliens qui font de la valeur ajoutée, sur place, avec leurs produits, sous-produits et produits semi-finis. Le Brésil, sixième producteur et troisième consommateur mondial, consomme l'ensemble de sa production. Un dynamisme entrepreneurial très en avance sur son voisin africain, qui pourrait avoir valeur d'exemple…Fredy Rajaonera est directeur général adjoint de la chocolaterie Robert. Il est également vice-président du Syndicat des industries de Madagascar (SIM) et coordonnateur général du groupe Ramanandraibe Exportation.CHiFFres ClÉs 80 % de la consommation mondiale de chocolat sont le fait des pays du Nord.1 % de la production mondiale est certifié équitable.1,48 million de tonnes est la production de cacao en Côte d'Ivoire en 2010.2-3 % de croissance annuelle, la demande mondiale de chocolat croît à un rythme fort et stable.Pourquoi avoir choisi le marché du cacao haut de gamme ? Si la production malgache est relativement faible en quantité (5 000 tonnes de cacao par an, contre 1,5 million de tonnes en Côte d'Ivoire, par exemple), la qualité est irréprochable. Les fèves de cacao biologique que nous produisons sont fines, fruitées et aromatisées, des qualités très recherchées. La Grande Île dispose d'un cru de cacao fin au nord-est (Sambirano) sur une étendue de 15 000 hectares, reconnu parmi les cinq plus grands crus au monde. Nous avons valorisé ce potentiel en visant les marchés de niche aux États-Unis, en France, Grande-Bretagne, Italie et dans les îles voisines. Chaque année, la chocolaterie Robert exporte 3 500 tonnes de fèves de cacao et 40 tonnes de chocolat.Criollo, trinitario et forastero sont les trois sortes de cacao que nous utilisons. Nous exportons 40 tonnes de chocolat chaque année sous différentes formes : poudre de cacao, tablettes de chocolat, coupe-faim, bûche de Noël, etc. La firme a décroché la Silver Cup de l'Académie du chocolat en France et un chocolat fabriqué par le chocolatier français Cluizel à partir de notre production a obtenu la plus haute distinction au Salon international du chocolat de Paris en 2004.Avoir le bon cru ne suffit pas, il faut aussi une bonne maturité des cabosses, une excellente fermentation mais également un dispositif de transformation moderne. À chaque étape, nous procédons à une analyse microbiologique et chimique des marchandises. Nos producteurs sont parmi les mieux lotis et sont surtout fidélisés. La chocolaterie achète directement auprès des planteurs ou à travers les collecteurs. Quels que soient les aléas de la production, elle assure aux paysans un minimum de commande et une prime à chaque campagne. Les planteurs disposent également de dispensaires de santé. Nous offrons régulièrement des formations et un encadrement sur le terrain. Nos deux ingénieurs hautement qualifiés collaborent avec les techniciens agricoles du ministère de l'Agriculture et nous faisons venir régulièrement au pays le meilleur ouvrier de France.Pour anticiper sur le vieillissement des plants de cacao, 1 500 hectares de nouvelles plantations sont prévus. Nous commençons aussi à nous diversifier, avec des fruits secs alliés au chocolat, de la confiserie, de la pâtisserie mais aussi l'exportation de beurre de cacao utilisé dans l'industrie cosmétique (fabrication de crèmes hydratantes). Company, qui se dresse derrière une haie plane de panneaux solaires. \"Je viens juste de finir de griller la dernière fournée de fèves de la journée\", indique Edmund Brown, l'un des fondateurs de la coopérative, qui est au travail depuis six heures du matin. Il explique que le bruit vient de la machine de conchage (NDLR : opération qui consiste à malaxer à chaud la pâte de chocolat dans des cuves ou conches). \"Il faut trois jours en tout -de la torréfaction des fèves au conditionnement des plaques -pour obtenir une belle pâte onctueuse.\" \"L'humidité est un problème pour stocker les fèves sèches.\" Mais ce problème est compensé par l'air de la montagne, idéal pour cultiver des fèves de première qualité. Entre-temps, Mott Green est le seul étranger parmi les treize associés d'une entreprise dont la pérennité repose sur trois éléments : revenus supérieurs, régularité (des revenus tout au long de l'année) et fierté. \"Développer Smilo\", avec sa pub au rythme calypso entraînant, voilà ce qui crée la dynamique. Smilo est la version locale de la poudre chocolatée Milo, version que la société fabrique sans sucre ni additifs. Sur l'île, ce sous-produit obtenu lors de l'extraction du beurre de cacao se vend mieux que les barres chocolatées. On le trouve dans tous les petits magasins d'alimentation. Pour preuve de sa réussite sur ce marché de niche -mais en plein essor -du chocolat noir authentique, l'entreprise a vu sa barre à 82 % de cacao récompensée par la médaille d'argent 2011 de l'Academy of Chocolate ; et son travail a été salué dans de grandes revues internationales. Elle vient de sortir une barre 100 % de cacao et proposera très bientôt Salty-Licious, une barre alliant du cacao 71 % et du sel de la mer des Caraïbes.Après un sursaut de la production, la société tente de la lisser à nouveau et d'occuper une place particulière sur le marché international, avec un chocolat gastronomique fin vendu à un prix avantageux. Elle vise les magasins spécialisés du marché européen haut de gamme -auxquels elle vend de plus petites quantités qu'aux grossistes mais en dégageant une marge supérieure. Un événement historique a marqué mars 2012 : la toute première livraison transatlantique de chocolat sans émission nette de carbone ! L'écovoilier Tres Hombres de Fair Transport a transporté 3 tonnes de chocolat noir biologique jusqu'au Royaume-Uni et à Amsterdam. Pour tous, la saveur de ce chocolat fabriqué à la Grenade dans un souci d'équité et dans le respect de l'environnement y a gagné en délicatesse et en richesse.ur ses 2 hectares de terrain à Mumias, dans l'ouest du Kenya, Mary Awino a construit 12 viviers, qu'elle a remplis de tilapias (Oreochromis niloticus). Cette espèce, facile à élever, atteint de bons prix. M. Awino produit ainsi par bassin entre 2,5 et 3,5 tonnes de tilapias tous les 9 mois.Comme Mary Awino, un nombre croissant de petits producteurs des pays ACP élèvent du tilapia, nom commun d'une centaine d'espèces de la famille des cichlidés. En raison de sa valeur nutritionnelle, de sa croissance rapide et de sa saveur, le tilapia est le troisième poisson d'élevage. Sa production mondiale est montée en flèche, passant de 1,6 million de tonnes en 1999 à plus de 3,5 millions de tonnes en 2010. Cette évolution spectaculaire est intervenue surtout en Asie, mais l'Afrique aussi connaît une nette progression. La tilapiculture est également importante dans le Pacifique. Dans les îles Salomon, où l'espèce élevée (Oreochromis mossambicus) ne suffit pas à répondre à la demande croissante des populations urbaines, les aquaculteurs ont introduit Oreochromis niloticus, à développement plus rapide. La production augmente d'autant plus vite que de petites et moyennes entreprises et des écoles se mettent à élever des tilapias pour améliorer revenus et régimes alimentaires.Le tilapia figure parmi les poissons les plus faciles et les plus rentables à élever : il est omnivore, supporte une forte densité de peuplement et se développe rapidement. Dans certaines régions, on peut l'introduire dans les rizières au moment de planter le riz ; une fois le riz à maturité, le poisson aura atteint une taille suffisante pour être consommé. Excellente source de protéines et de micronutriments, pauvre en graisses saturées, en hydrates de carbone et en sodium, le tilapia contribue fortement à la sécurité alimentaire des ménages. Cette étude revient sur la question de la protection de la production agricole locale aux frontières en Afrique de l'Ouest et prône une protection différenciée pour les produits les plus sensibles que sont le riz et le sucre. Ce livre commence par clarifier la notion d'organisation de producteurs avant de faire un retour historique sur leur montée en puissance. Il détaille ensuite les rôles très divers que sont amenées à jouer les OP, acteurs à part entière du développement rural et parties prenantes des stratégies de réduction de la pauvreté. Le renforcement des capacités des OP passe en interne par la formation de leurs membres, mais aussi par l'amélioration de leurs liens avec l'extérieur, jusqu'à leur participation à la définition des politiques publiques.Cet ouvrage très pédagogique s'appuie sur l'expérience de terrain des auteurs : une agronome, un sociologue et un agroéconomiste. Il s'adresse aux acteurs du développement agricole et aidera professionnels et acteurs des OP à y voir plus clair dans leurs pratiques. La participation des pays émergents aux efforts mondiaux d'atténuation du changement climatique devient incontournable compte tenu de la forte croissance de leurs émissions de gaz à effet de serre. Mais elle devra se faire en tenant compte du principe de responsabilité \"commune, mais différenciée\". ■ La photographie scientifique permet de faire des merveilles. Cet ouvrage l'atteste, qui propose une exploration visuelle sans précédent de la structure des différentes parties des plantes et arbres : racines, tronc ou tiges, feuilles. Mais le but de cet ouvrage n'est pas esthétique. Grâce aux vues microscopiques dont la précision, en plus de la beauté, force le respect, le discours scientifique sur la morphologie végétale prend une autre dimension.L'objectif est clair : dispenser de façon limpide et concise les connaissances sur la structure des plantes. Après un chapitre introductif sur la morphologie des plantes vasculaires, le lecteur trouvera une synthèse des connaissances actuelles sur les classifications et l'anatomie des plantes, du macroscopique ou submicroscopique.Cet ouvrage apparaît comme un concentré de savoirs et constitue, à ce titre, un complément indispensable aux manuels de cours traditionnels de l'étudiant et un support iconographique inédit pour l'enseignant et le chercheur. Il pourra aussi susciter la curiosité de l'amateur averti grâce à une présentation particulièrement attractive. ■ Le commerce équitable, c'est quoi ? Quels en sont les acteurs locaux et internationaux ? Quelles filières sont concernées ? Ce \"dictionnaire\" part de 31 concepts-clés du commerce équitable qui constituent autant d'entrées pour rendre compte des recherches universitaires menées sur ce sujet par l'association FairNESS. Cette association francophone oeuvre, depuis 2007, pour la structuration de la recherche sur le commerce équitable et le dialogue entre scientifiques et acteurs de terrain.Trois grands domaines sont passés en revue : les principes fondamentaux du commerce équitable et son éthique, ses acteurs et enfin son développement actuel. Il analyse notamment les différents courants qui coexistent au sein du commerce équitable, avec une approche multidisciplinaire : sociologique, politique, juridique, économique… Cet ouvrage de référence s'adresse tout autant aux chercheurs désireux d'étudier et de mieux connaître et comprendre le phénomène du commerce équitable qu'aux étudiants en sciences sociales ou aux militants, entrepreneurs, citoyens qui s'interrogent sur l'équité dans les relations commerciales. Sur la base de recherches récentes, ce numéro explore les multiples facettes de l'émancipation féminine dans les pays du Sud et la manière dont les processus émancipatoires se déploient selon les contextes de ces pays. Si les auteurs restent prudents sur la portée des changements observés, ils constatent que le processus d'empowerment des femmes, même s'il demeure fragile, est bel et bien lancé. Cette note résume succinctement ce qu'est une politique foncière, à quoi elle sert, comment elle s'applique. Ses grandes fonctions se trouvent ici synthétisées par rapport à la répartition du foncier agricole, aux droits fonciers et leur protection et enfin à la protection et la gestion des ressources naturelles. ■ L'agriculture biologique fait débat. Mais les arguments avancés pour en vanter les bénéfices ou en dénoncer les insuffisances ne sont pas toujours rigoureux et souvent guidés par des a priori. Surtout, affirme l'auteur, ce sont rarement ses acteurs qui prennent la parole dans le débat. Cet ouvrage ambitionne de combler cette lacune en donnant la parole à des producteurs, notamment des pays du Sud, et en relatant leur expérience. Il parvient ainsi à démonter certains de ces a priori avancés par les adversaires du \"bio\" : le bio est trop cher, le bio n'est pas assez productif... En donnant une définition précise de l'agriculture biologique, il rappelle qu'elle ne se réduit pas à l'absence d'usage de produits chimiques, avant de se poser la question de son avenir comme mode de culture respectueux des équilibres naturels climatiques, sociaux et territoriaux.Cet ouvrage, écrit par un passionné, s'adresse à tout consommateur curieux des enjeux liés au contenu de son assiette ainsi qu'à tout citoyen soucieux de pouvoir se positionner sur les grands débats relatifs aux OGM, aux problématiques sanitaires sur l'alimentation et au défi de l'alimentation mondiale. N'est-il pas naïf de croire qu'Internet peut aider à réduire la pauvreté des communautés rurales ou à atténuer l'impact du changement climatique ?Non. Internet donne aujourd'hui à tous la possibilité de s'impliquer plus dans les processus de changement et de trouver de nouvelles façons de gagner sa vie en s'adaptant aux circonstances. Nous devons supprimer les obstacles qui gênent l'accès aux connaissances et donner aux gens qui jusque-là n'avaient pas accès à l'information la possibilité d'y accéder.Les TIC consacrées au développement international s'appuient sur les outils du Web 2.0. Quelle sera la prochaine étape ? -Savoir comment les partenaires planifient, suivent et évaluent leurs projets et leurs activités.-Partager les bonnes pratiques et les enseignements tirés dans ces domaines, et voir comment les appliquer au niveau de l'organisation.-Définir des activités de suivi et d'évaluation communes pour l'année à venir.L'atelier combinera des approches conceptuelles et pragmatiques de la planification, du suivi et de l'évaluation. Les participants représenteront des organisations régionales et des réseaux et communautés de terrain. Le CTA participe (suite de la page 25) Ce concours, en marge de la conférence sur les chaînes de valeur (6-9 novembre 2012, Addis-Abeba, Éthiopie), vise à encourager les journalistes à s'intéresser aux problèmes et aux opportunités que représente l'implication de petits agriculteurs dans les chaînes de valeur. Il les invite à mettre en avant les succès et les bonnes pratiques susceptibles de pouvoir être reproduits ou appliqués ailleurs, et les encourage à sensibiliser l'opinion sur l'importance des chaînes de valeur pour le développement agricole et rural. Le concours se concentre sur les thèmes prioritaires à l'ordre du jour de la conférence : l'innovation, les cadres favorables aux chaînes de valeur, la pérennité de ces chaînes et leur transposition à grande échelle, enfin, le développement des capacités. Pour de plus amples informations, contactez Samuel Mikenga (Mikenga@cta.int). au sujet de la conférence internationale organisée par le Cta et ses partenaires sur les chaînes de valeur, en novembre prochain, en Éthiopie, m. rabiu Auwalu Yakasai lance un appel : \"Peu à peu, nous nous dirigeons vers une situation qui permettra aux petits producteurs d'intégrer les nouvelles tendances mondiales de l'agriculture. À tous les acteurs des chaînes de valeur des produits de base en afrique, et particulièrement en afrique de l'ouest : ressaisissez-vous et passez à la vitesse supérieure ! vous avez l'occasion de décoller maintenant. C'est maintenant ou jamais.\"À propos du stockage du niébé, m. elhadji Niang, qui réalise actuellement une étude sur le sujet au sénégal, précise : \"nous vous remercions de votre texte sur les méthodes de stockage du niébé. votre constat est très pertinent. toutefois, pour que ce produit soit indemne de toute attaque pendant sa période de stockage, il faut d'abord qu'il soit bien séché au niveau du champ où il est récolté. il faut ensuite effectuer une solarisation pour tuer tous les insectes contenus dans le produit avant de le mettre dans des silos bien préparés.\"Concernant les nouvelles technologies numériques, m. Issouf sanou de la FenoP (burkina Faso) nous fait part de son opinion : \"Pour toucher les producteurs de base, il ne faudra pas se focaliser uniquement sur la distribution en ligne ou les tiC, ces outils ne sont pas accessibles dans les villages. il faudra continuer à travailler en réseau avec des organisations paysannes pour diffuser les expériences.\"dans notre numéro 158, nous abordions l'opération \"mesures parcellaires\" qui a lieu au bénin. À ce propos, m. Éric tchokanaka nous écrit : \"l'effectivité des mesures parcellaires au GPs a permis de résoudre le problème de fiabilité des superficies coton au bénin, je le confirme. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4589987327.json b/main/part_2/4589987327.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8fc6cb78e94c37aa27e40e029726e3866e80164f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4589987327.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a8b00cfc267a08a90d1760d8a9839af0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f5bfc95b-92c0-4db2-869a-a6398e64a68a/retrieve","id":"2130976945"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9da31776-e39f-4594-8eba-072b1dbf8ee2","content":"Internet, Aliado para Enverdecer el Mundo Enero de 1998El trabajo que varios países e instituciones vienen realizando para tener un mundo más verde, aprovechando la \"literatura gris\", cuenta ahora con un fuerte aliado: Internet.En su penúltima fase, este proyecto -cuyo fin es establecer una red de información sobre manejo de recursos naturales generada en los países de América tropical-ubicó un sitio en el ciberespacio para facilitar los contactos entre investigadores, estudiantes, instituciones de desarrollo y comunidades interesadas en esta tarea.La dirección electrónica es www.ciat.cgiar.org/greylit, con la cual se puede obtener información relacionada con el proyecto, los beneficiarios, la metodología del trabajo, las temáticas. Asimismo, permite consultar una base de datos con más de 13 mil referencias, y tener acceso a documentos fuente y a un boletín sobre manejo de recursos naturales y agricultura sostenible en los ecosistemas de laderas, en las sabanas y márgenes de bosques de América tropical. Todo esto es el producto de este proyecto colaborativo financiado por la Fundación W.K. Kellogg.Por esta misma vía, los interesados pueden registrarse y, además, consultar la base de datos de contactos con instituciones o personas que han contribuido con documentos al proyecto o que trabajan en áreas relacionadas.Se conoce como \"literatura gris\" la información que nunca ha sido publicada o que lo fue de manera no convencional, como tesis, informes anuales, encuestas, documentos de trabajo, memorias, informes estadísticos, mapas, etc.La coordinación general del proyecto está a cargo del Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), en Cali, Colombia, a través de su Unidad de Información y Documentación. En América Central, el coordinador es el Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE) en Costa Rica.\"Desde un comienzo, en 1996, el proyecto se basó en el principio de participación cuya premisa fundamental es compartir recursos, y así ha continuado\", dice Elizabeth Goldberg, jefe de la Unidad de Información y Documentación del CIAT.Forman parte de la red instituciones de Bolivia, Brasil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua, Perú y Venezuela, cuyos contactos también se pueden hacer a través de la página electrónica de Internet."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4602381530.json b/main/part_2/4602381530.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..63e1945f6032c3395633333b73610feef30f2ea1 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4602381530.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"33095e851f85eab5757ac26a4a3773ee","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/99f70e3c-6738-450a-beb5-31f8a8e3b27a/content","id":"1788808860"},"keywords":["Provitamin A carotenoids","GXE interaction","Zea mays L.","Stability","Vitamin A deficiency","Grain yield","Factor analysis"],"sieverID":"fa860155-2ff9-4247-9c15-3caf13b08a84","content":"Vitamin A Deficiency (VAD) is a major public health problem in Sub-Saharan Africa affecting 33 million preschool-age children. Enrichment of maize varieties with provitamin A could provide sustainable and affordable solution to VAD. This study was conducted to understand the extent of GEI effects on both grain yield and provitamin A content in 21 maize synthetics and identify synthetics combining stable performance with high level provitamin A content across diverse environments in West Africa. Combined analysis of variance found significant (p \\ 0.01) GEI effects that prompted further investigation of the GEI magnitude using mixed model with factor analysis. Factors 1 and 2 explained 71% of the total variability. G5, G4, G12, G18, G2 and G14 were broadly adapted to a range of environments and considered the most stable and high yielding. G8, G1, and G10 were specifically adapted to a group of environments. Whereas, G21, G19 and G17 were found to be the worst and unstable genotypes. G4 combined stable performance with high provitamin A content, whereas G20 and G18 were stable but had low provitamin A contents. Three genotypes, G4, G12 and G14 were found to combine stability with high provitamin A contents. These genotypes can be recommended for production in the low-land tropics of West and Central Africa with similar environments.Maize (Zea mays L.) is a staple food crop for millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and is regarded as a vital crop for global nutrition (IITA 2010;Nuss and Tanumihardjo 2010). Most of the maize that is produced and consumed is white and devoid of provitamin A carotenoids (Menkir et al. 2008;Li et al. 2007). This may partly explain why vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is a major public health problem in SSA (Nuss and Tanumihardjo 2010), affecting approximately 33 million preschool-age children in the continent (West 2002). In South Africa, for example, the number of children with VAD increased from 33% in 1994 to 64% in 2005 (Labadarios et al. 2007;Labadarios and Van Middelkoop 1995). VAD is responsible for several disorders that range from impaired iron mobilization, growth retardation, and blindness to a depressed immune response, increased susceptibility to infectious disease and childhood mortality and morbidity affecting 190 million preschool-age children and 19 million pregnant women, mostly in Africa and South Asia (Sommer and Davidson 2002;Rice et al. 2004;WHO 2009).Maize is one of the six staple crops that have been targeted for biofortification to combat VAD under the HarvestPlus Challenge Programme (Tanumihardjo 2008;HarvestPlus Brief 2006). Biofortification of maize varieties with provitamin A through conventional breeding is viewed as a potential long-term, sustainable and affordable strategy to alleviate VAD in selected target groups (Howe and Tanumihardjo 2006a, b;Nestel et al. 2006). The current target level set for conventional maize breeding under HarvestPlus is 15 lg/g dry weight (DW) of provitamin A (Ortiz-Monasterio et al. 2007). The high provitamin A content should be combined with high yield potential and consistent performance across a broad range of growing conditions to promote adoption of the biofortified maize cultivars by farmers.Grain yield and provitamin A content are complex traits that are affected by the environment and genotype 9 environment interaction (GEI). Environmental variables such as pH, temperature, solar radiation, precipitation, organic matter, and soil texture have the potential to influence nutrient concentration in crops (Cabuslay et al. 2003;Joshi et al. 2010) and must then be taken into consideration while examining the variation for micronutrient content in crop plants. Several studies conducted to assess the nutritional quality of genotypes grown in diverse growing conditions found significant GEI for betacarotene and provitamin A content in maize (Manjeru 2017;Oikeh et al. 2004;Gregorio 2002;Trethowan 2007), wheat (Gregorio 2002;Trethowan 2007;Hedieh et al. 2013;Bashir et al. 2014), rice (Gregorio 2002;Trethowan 2007), Tomato (Rosales et al. 2006), Irish potato (Haynes et al. 2010), orange fleshed sweet potato (Gurmu et al. 2015;Kathabwalika et al. 2016), and vegetables (Granado et al. 1992). In contrast, other studies did not find significant GEI in maize (Menkir and Maziya-Dixon 2004;Egesel et al. 2003;Har-vestPlus Brief 2014), rice (HarvestPlus Brief 2014), cassava (Norbert et al. 2010), orange fleshed sweet potato (Gruneberg et al. 2005;Mbwaga et al. 2008;Tsegaye et al. 2011) and vegetables (Campos et al. 2006).The maize improvement program at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) has developed synthetics with elevated levels of provitamin A adapted to production conditions in West and Central Africa. Considering the conflicting results of the GEI effects on beta-carotene and provitamin A content reported in the literature, testing these varieties across locations and years is necessary to identify those with high yield potential and provitamin A content as well as minimal GEI. Consequently, the varieties selected for elevated levels of provitamin A have been extensively evaluated in field trials, in which inferior varieties have been constantly replaced with promising new varieties over the years. The resulting unbalanced data from such multi-environment trials is amenable to GEI analysis using mixed models with factor analytic variance and covariance structure (Smith et al. 2001;Kelly et al. 2007;Nuvunga et al. 2015). Nuvunga et al. (2015) used this methodology to assess three levels of data imbalance, reaching up to 50%, and found that the FA (Factor Analysis) methodology is robust in analyzing data recorded in multi-environments, including situations in which the genotypes are not evaluated in all the environments and/or years. The present study was, therefore, conducted to understand the extent of GEI effects on both yield and provitamin A content of maize synthetics and to identify maize varieties with consistently high grain yield and higher levels of provitamin A across diverse environments.The genetic materials used in this study included 21 provitamin A maize synthetics each developed at IITA by intercrossing eight inbred lines selected for intermediate to high level of pro-vitamin A and good combining ability (Table 1). All the provitamin A rich maize synthetics used in this study were grown across nine locations and 4 years, and all were evaluated under rain fed conditions during the main growing season (June-November). Among the synthetics, ten were commonly evaluated across all the 4 years, 19 were commonly evaluated in 2012 and 2013, and 12 were tested in 2014 and 2015. The 21 provitamin A maize synthetics used in this study were evaluated along with a commercial orange single-cross maize hybrid (Oba Super 2), aflatoxin resistant orange maize variety (Aflatoxin syn-Y2) and a commonly cultivated improved orange open pollinated maize variety (Acr.91 Suwan 1-SR C1) used as a reference check as well as a farmers preferred variety as a local check (Table 1). Provitamin A concentrations were measured from seed samples of the 21 provitamin A rich maize synthetics harvested from trials using HPLC. Provitamin A was defined as the sum of b-carotene, b-cryptoxanthin and a-carotene, with a-carotene and b-cryptoxanthin contributing 50% of the value of b-carotene (U.S. Institute of Medicine 2001).The trials involving provitamin A maize synthetics and the checks were arranged in 7 9 3 alpha lattice design with three replications in 2012 and 2013, and 6 9 3 alpha lattice design with three replications in 2014 and 2015. The trials were evaluated during the main rainy season across the major maize testing sites in Nigeria, Ghana and Gambia. Each PVA synthetic was planted in two 5-m-long rows with 0.75 m distance between rows and 0.5 m distance within rows. Three seeds were planted in a hill and thinned to two plants after emergence to attain a population density of 53,333 plants ha -1 in each location. Standard cultural practices, recommended rates of fertilizer application, and pest and weed control measures were used in all environments. Generally, rainfall distributions were good across test locations and growing seasons during evaluation of these trials (Tables 2, 3).Each location 9 year combination (environment) was analyzed separately followed by a combined analysis across all the environments. The Combined multilocational analysis was conducted using multivariate mixed models according to Nuvunga et al. (2015) and proposed by Patterson and Thompson (1971) and described as follows: where y is a vector of observations from plots for each variety in each environment.b and b are the fixed and random effect vectors respectively, e denotes the random error vector, and X is the incidence matrix of the fixed effects for the blocks; Z the incidence matrix of random effects corresponding to the maize varieties.Considering the mixed model matrix (Santos et al. 2017) below,The solutions for b and b from the mixed model equation can be derived as:The random effect vector b was classified using Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm described by Dempster et al. (1977). The REML solution for the elements of G matrix is described below:withThe matrix C ij -1 corresponds to the submatrices i and j of the inverse matrix C -1 The error variance estimator is described below:where H is {X, Z}. The trace depends on i and j submatrix, n* is the length of the{j, i} vector. The approach described is synonymous to an unstructured (UN) variance-covariance matrix, hence both variances {r ek , r bk} and covariances { r eij r bij} are estimated.Factor analytic variance-covariance structure was applied to the mixed model equation. Similar to applying factor analysis directly on the matrix of REML estimates (Meyer 2007) Such that: b can be written in the form I [Lf ? d], while G can also be written as (LL 0 ? W).The factor scores for the effect of b can be solved by substituting I [Lf ? d] for b in the equation using the notation of Meyer (2009); such that:where f * N(0, I), d * N(0, W) and e * N(0,R). f is the vector of factor scores, d specific factor, L is the matrix of factor loading and W represent the matrix of specific variances.Restricting the factor loadings is an important corrective measure when choosing FA-n models. In order to guarantee the uniqueness of the choice of L, L t W -1 L = D was used as restriction; where D is a diagonal matrix. The very important step to estimating L and W is to derive the matrix W -1/2 (A -W)W -1/2 . In other to derive L ¼ W 1=2 P the Expectation Maximization algorithm will be used. P is derived by the spectral decomposition ofThe iteration continues until L and W matrices converge. Hence, L can used to describe the factor loadings for each environment (Nuvunga et al.2015).The matrix solution to the derived mixed model equation above ( 9) by substituting ZL with h, is given below (Smith et al. 2001)The solutions for factor scores, fixed and random effects is estimated below (Smith et al. 2001;Santos et al. 2017The combined analysis of covariance found significant variety, environment and variety 9 environment interaction effects for both grain yield and provitamin A contents (p \\ 0.01) (Tables 4, 5). Environment accounted for most of the total variation for both grain yield (58%) and provitamin A content (39%), indicating the presence of wide variation in testing conditions under which the varieties were evaluated. The repeatability values were 0.90 for grain yield and 0.91 for PVA. The significant variety 9 environment interaction effects prompted further investigation of the magnitude of GEI using mixed model with factor analytic covariance structure. Mean grain yields of the 21 maize synthetics averaged across the environments varied from 3 to 8 tons ha -1 . All the test synthetics produced higher grain yields in comparison to the local check variety. The maize synthetics included in this study exhibited a broad range in provitamin A concentrations. G3 and G4 consistently showed higher provitamin A content across locations and years, with an average content of 8-11 lg g -1 .Results of factor analysis for yieldIn our study, factor 1 and factor 2 together explained 72% of the total variance (Fig. 1). Out of the 36 environments included in this study, 29 environments were placed in quadrant I and IV, which represent the most favorable environments with above average grain yield. In contrast, seven environments fell in quadrant II and III and are considered as unfavorable environments where genotype performance was poor. Environments E11, E12, E23, E35 contributed the least to the GEI (Fig. 1). In this analysis, yield stability can be described by the scores of factors 2. Productive and stable genotypes should thus have high scores for factor 1, but values nearer zero for factor 2. Nine of the 21 maize synthetics were placed in quadrant I and IV and are all better performing varieties with above average yield. Varieties G16, G11, G14 and G4 were specifically adapted to environments E28, E21, E25, E26 and E22. Amongst these varieties G2, G5, G12, and G20 were found to be stable and high yielding across environments (Fig. 1). On the other hand varieties G1, G6, G9 and G21 were found to be inferior and unstable in terms of grain yield.Figure 2 shows the polygon-view of the FA biplot to help in visualizing the pattern of the multienvironment trial results. A polygon was drawn by connecting provitamin A rich maize varieties that were furthest from the biplot origin such that all varieties were enclosed within the polygon. An orange commercial hybrid G20 and varieties G8, G9, G1, G21 and G6 located at the corner of the polygon were considered as the vertex varieties (Fig. 2) and they were thus the most responsive varieties to environments compared to others. Amongst these, G20 was a winning and most stable commercial hybrid across 29 environments, whereas, the remaining vertex varieties (G1, G6, G8, G9 and G21) were specifically adapted to certain environment, but were found to be low yielding and unstable (Fig. 2) As shown in Fig. 2 varieties G5, G4, G12, G18, G2 and G14 were adapted to a broad range of environments and are considered to be the most stable with yield potential of [ 6 t/ha. Out of these, G4 and G12 were released in Nigeria and are the most popular PVA synthetics that are currently under production. G8, G1, G9 and G10 were specifically adapted to environments E30 (Zaria 2015), E29 (Saminaka 2015) and E 24 (Ejura 2014). The local check (G21), G19 and G17 were found to be the lowest yielding and unstable varieties.Figure 3 shows the patterns of distribution of both environments and varieties. Varieties falling within a group of environments having similar patterns of distribution are considered to have common adaptation. While varieties G16, G11, G2, G4, G12, G5 and G18 showed better adaptation to the majority of the environments shown in the confidence eclipses, varieties G8, G9, G1 were found to be specifically adapted to certain environments. Three varieties (G21, G19 and G6) were identifies as unstable and low yielding (Fig. 3).The FA of biplots for provitamin A content of 20 maize varieties are shown in Figs. 4, 5 and 6. As shown in Fig. 4, the two factors together explained 84% of the total variance among the varieties. Among all the environments used under this study, only five environments were placed in quadrant II and III which were considered as unfavorable environments where low level of provitamin A content was recorded (Fig. 4). The majority of the environments were placed under quadrant I and IV representing the most favorable environments with above average provitamin A content. Environments that least contributed to the GEI were environments E11, E12, E23, E35 (Fig. 4). Ten of the 20 provitamin A maize varieties were placed in quadrant I and IV and are all better performing varieties with above average provitamin A content. The remaining 10 varieties were placed in quadrant II and III with below average performance in provitamin A content, with G18 and G20 being the worst performer. E14 (Mok 2013) contributed less to GEI for provitamin A content in the maize varieties (Fig. 4). Three varieties (G4, G3 and G16) showed better adaptation to Zar 2014, Kad 2014, Mok 2014 and Sam 2014. G2, G11, G15, G8 and G12 showed better adaptation to Kad 2015, Zar 2012, and Mok 2012 (Fig. 4). While environments Sam 13 and Mok 13 contributed less to the GEI of provitamin A content (Fig. 4), Zar14, Ike12 and Mok12 contributed the most to the interaction. Two provitamin A varieties (G4 and G3) were better performing in environments Kad14, Zar14 and Mok14 and were also found to be the most stable across locations and years.Variety G4 was the most adapted with high and stable PVA content. The varieties that are most distant from the biplot origin, including G15, G14, G6 and G11 contributed most to GEI (Fig. 5). The local check G20 and synthetic variety G18 were stable but had low provitamin A content compared to other varieties under investigation. Figure 5 shows the polygon-view of the FA biplot to help in visualizing the pattern of the multi-environment trial dataset. G11, G4 and G3, G14, G6, G18 and G5 located at the corner of the polygon were the vertex varieties. Among these G11, G4 and G3 had high pro-vitamin A content. G4 was found to be a variety with the highest provitamin A content and also the most stable across environments. The other vertex varieties (G6, G14, G5 and G18) were specifically adapted to IBA15 and MOK15 but found to be low in provitamin A content (Fig. 5). G3 had the highest provitamin A content, but specifically adapted to environments with less stable provitamin A concentration as compared to G4 (Fig. 5). The local check (G21) had the lowest but stable provitamin A content and also recorded the lowest grain yield across all the test locations. G4, G15 and G16 were stable with high PVA content across environments. The FA bi-plot analysis identified G16, G4, G12 and G2 as stable with high PVA content. These varieties can be recommended for release in Nigeria, Ghana and Gambia.G4 (PVA SYN 13) was already released in Nigeria, Ghana and Cameroon. Generally, this study identified G4, G2, G15, G16, G11 and G8 as varieties with broad adaptation and consistent provitamin A content across environments. G18, G20, G5, G1 and G17 were identified as poorly adapted varieties with low and inconsistent provitamin A expression.Clustering can help in identifying varieties having similar performance across environments and provides valuable information for future varietal recommendation. The varieties were clustered based on their grain yields across test environments (Fig. 7). There were three major groups of PVA maize varieties, with the commercial hybrid check (Oba Super 2) being separated from the three groups. Cluster I had six varieties (G11, G16, G8, G9, G1 and G10) with four of them having higher grain yield and two varieties (G1 and G10) having lower grain yields. Cluster II had four varieties (G6, G7, G19 and G21), all of them having lower grain yield. Cluster III had 12 varieties (G3, G19, G6, G18, G13, G15, G17, G5, G12, G2, G4 and G14) with most of them having similar grain yields. Cluster III is comprised of the most promising varieties for release, two of the most popular provitamin A maize varieties released in Nigeria were also included in this cluster. Clustering of the varieties was also done for provitamin A content, which resulted in three major groups (Fig. 8). Cluster I comprised of two varieties (G3 and G4), which had higher pro-vitamin A content compared to others. Cluster II had seven varieties (G15, G7, G12, G2, G10, G8 and G11) all with intermediate provitamin A content. Cluster III consisted of nine varieties (G1, G18, G17, G6, G14, G16, G13, G19 and G20), containing lower levels of provitamin A. Cluster analysis found these varieties (G2, G3, G4 and G12) that combined high grain yield with high provitamin A content. In contrast G1 and G16 were found to be low yielding with low provitamin A content.Most crop-breeding programs require flexibility when dealing with the addition and removal of genotypes which results in generating unbalanced data that can be analyzed using mixed models to study GEI (Piepho 1998;Crossa et al. 2006). In the present study involving unbalanced data significant GEI was found for both grain yield and provitamin A content, consistent with the results in other studies (Granado et al. 1992;Oikeh et al. 2004;Bashir et al. 2014;Gurmu et al. 2015;Manjeru 2017). Changes in genotype raking for PVA from environment to environment were detected in the present study, which is in agreement with high environmental variation reported for maize in other regions (Ali et al. 2010;Beyene et al. 2013;Makumbi et al. 2015). Such rank changes could arise from differences in altitude, latitude, rainfall pattern, soil PH, temperature, solar radiation, acidic condition and soil textures affecting grain yield of the varieties in this study. Changes in environmental factors could also result in differential accumulation of provitamin A carotenoids in varieties included in the present study, which were contrary to the results reported in other studies (Brunson and Quackenbush 1962;Egesel et al. 2003;Kurilich and Juvik 1999;Menkir et al. 2014).Stability estimates of promising genotypes must be repeatable across years in order to detect and recommend superior genotypes (Annicchiarico 2002). To detect the relative stability and GEI of varieties, the applicability of factor-analysis associated with mixed models for MET analysis of unbalanced data is of paramount importance (Figueiredo et al. 2014;Santos et al. 2017). The current study showed that the FA models was a powerful statistical tool for discriminating the provitamin A maize synthetics, providing strong basis for making inferences regarding their adaptability and stability in yield and provitamin A contents, despite the complex nature of the data (Burguen ˜o et al. 2008(Burguen ˜o et al. , 2011)). Varieties showing positive interaction with the environments could be exploited for specific agro-ecological conditions of the target environments and are therefore best suited to those environments (Kandus et al. 2010;Gurmu et al. 2015). Most of the synthetics in our study had broad adaptability to the environments under which the trials were conducted, with only few synthetics still showing relatively narrow adaptation. There were also synthetics with specific adaptation to certain environments, consistent with the results in other studies (Yan and Kang 2003). Furthermore, environments which are positioned closer in the bi-plot are considered to reveal strong positive association, which in turn shows their similarity in discriminating genotypes (Gauch and Zobel 1997;Yan et al. 2007). In the present study, environments E28, E21, E25, E26 and E22 were positioned closer to each other in the factor bi-plot, these environments showed a positive association in discriminating the synthetics.The probability of success in adoption of high provitamin A maize varieties by producers, processors and consumers depends on high yield potential and other desirable agronomic and end-use quality traits (Menkir et al. 2008). In the present study, several synthetics competitive to a commercial hybrid in grain yield potential and had high provitamin A content were identified, selected and recommended. Carotenoid levels throughout the plant are influenced by developmental stages and various biotic and abiotic stresses (Cuttriss et al. 2011). Therefore, understanding carotenoid biosynthesis in relation to environmental factors and the GEI are important in selection and identification of provitamin A rich varieties with high and stable carotenoid levels (Suwarno et al. 2015). Genetic analyses conducted with populations segregating in seed color (Chandler et al. 2013) and carotenoid profiles (Chander et al. 2008) have demonstrated that differences in composition and content of seed carotenoids are quantitatively inherited and highly influenced by GEI, which is in agreement with our study, where there was significant GEI for carotenoid content. Provitamin A carotenoids are much more sensitive to degradation due to environmental factors (Gregory 1996;Kimura et al. 2007;De Moura et al. 2015), which might be the potential factor behind the fluctuation in PVA content and rank changes in the present study. Several carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs) and carotenoid cleavage genes, whose activity are mainly influenced by environments are known to catalyze degradation of carotenoids to apocarotenoids (Vallabhaneni et al. 2010).The development and dissemination of high yielding and nutritionally enhanced maize varieties in Nigeria and other similar environments in SSA is crucial as the economic conditions of the subsistence farmers in SSA does not allow them to buy hybrid seeds every year (Pixley and Bjarnason 2002). Identification of varieties combining high yield potential with better nutritional quality is an important step towards shaping future breeding because varieties can be used as variety per se and as sources of outstanding inbred parents for hybrid development (Pixley and Bjarnason 2002). Our study demonstrated the possibility of developing maize varieties that combine elevated levels of provitamin-A with high grain yields and broad adaptation across environments. In the present study, synthetics placed in one cluster had both high grain yields and high provitamin A content, indicating that they had gone through a rigorous selection process for the two traits. This is an important milestone towards achieving the goals of biofortification to increase the availability of nutritionally enhanced maize varieties associated with high yield potentials. Further testing of these provitamin A maize varieties and generating promising inbred lines for developing provitamin A rich maize hybrids with much higher levels of carotenoids and enhanced performance and wide adaptation can improve food and nutritional security of farmers in SSA. As breeding for nutritional quality in maize is at an early stage compared to breeding for other traits in white maize, more focus and funding on breeding, selection, development and deployment of better performing and stable provitamin A rich maize varieties are important to curb the wide spread VAD in SSA in a sustainable and affordable manner.In conclusion, four PVA synthetics G4, G2, G16, and G12 were identified as stable and high yielding with significantly enhanced levels of provitamin A across test environments. These synthetics were developed from provitamin A rich elite inbred lines adapted to low-land tropical environments and are tolerant to most biotic and abiotic constraints in the target production zones. G4 was released in Nigeria, DR Congo, Ghana and Cameroon whereas G12 was released in Nigeria. Also, G2 and G16 can be recommended for release in Nigeria, Ghana and Gambia. Varieties identified in this study can also be registered in other African countries with similar agroecological zones, through the regional seed harmonization policy currently being implemented in most African countries."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4602654844.json b/main/part_2/4602654844.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e74c6299d0cd480ee11d308447ca1f1d211c6f99 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4602654844.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3e378c5cbb8cfe589e8cf35bc7323f51","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c843660d-7e2c-4968-9941-004487217060/retrieve","id":"-823058181"},"keywords":["Social inclusion","seed business","varietal turnover","seed systems","seed aid"],"sieverID":"ea69431b-4d38-47f9-a86d-8fab9c953b17","content":"In the name of food security, governments and NGOs purchase large volumes of maize seed in non-relief situations to provide at reduced or no cost to producers. At the same time, efforts to build formal maize seed systems have been frustrated by slow turnover ratesthe dominance of older seed products in the market over newer, higher performing ones. Under certain conditions, governments and NGO seed aid purchases can support formal seed systems development in three ways: i) support increased producer awareness of new products, ii) support local private seed industry development, and iii) advance equity goals by targeting aid to the most vulnerable of producers who lack the capacity to purchase seeds. This study explores the objectives and activities of seed aid programmes in Uganda and their interactions with the maize seed sector. We draw insights from interviews with representatives of seed companies, NGOs and government agencies, as well as focus group discussions with producers. The findings indicated that seed aid programme objectives are largely disconnected from broader seed systems development goals. There is little evidence of public-private collaboration in design of these programmes. Better designed programs have the potential to align with varietal turnover objectives, commercial sector development and targeting of underserved markets could promote equity and 'crowd in' demand.In many parts of the global South, faster progress towards poverty alleviation and food security goals, will depend, in part, on farmers having access to improved varieties that meet their requirements as both farmers and consumers. Governments and donors have responded to this challenge through their long-term support for crop breeding by CGIAR and National Agricultural Research Institutes (NARES). In the case of cereals, crop breeding for many parts of the global South has aimed to support farmers' resilience to changing agro-climatic conditions (Atlin et al., 2017). Investments in breeding have been complemented by investments in seed systems development aimed at improving farmer access to improved seed through formal and informal channels. The issues surrounding seed systems development are complex, with strong, and sometimes opposing, views on the appropriate roles of farmers, governments and the private sector (Mulvany, 2005;Thompson, 2012).In East and Southern Africa, crop breeding and seed systems development has a focused on rainfed hybrid maizea crop that is critical for food security in the region and which is facing considerable challenges due to increasing variation in rainfall and temperature (Cairns et al., 2013). Over recent decades, these investments have delivered results: CGIAR and NARES breeding programmes release dozens of new seed products 1 a year that vary in maturity levels and pest and disease resistance, among other attributes. Farmers have reliable access to a wide selection of maize seed products via thousands of retail shops spread across the region. The maize seed sector consists of dozens of locally and internationally owned seed companies, some with decades of experience in production and marketing. Government and donor investments in maize breeding and seed systems development across East and Southern Africa have been an important factor in explaining overall increasing levels of maize productivity since the 1970s (Smale and Jayne, 2009).Looking ahead, future progress in maize seed systems development will require solutions to slow varietal turnover that is, the persistence of previous-generation maize seed products in farmer's fields, despite the availability of newgeneration products that offer higher yields and are drought and disease tolerant. Research has pointed to farmers' overall lack of information on new seed products, and their lack of engagement with seed retailers on seed-product attributes (Rutsaert & Donovan, 2020). Farmers may perceive new products, in particular new hybrids, to cost more (Nakanwagi, 2021), and may have concerns over seed quality (Barriga & Fiala 2020;Gharib et al., 2021). In many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, open-pollinated varieties (OPVs) continue to represent a major segment of the maize seed market (Abate et al., 2017). Discussions on maize seed systems development have offered few insights on potential solutions to the varietal turnover problem. Efforts to develop formal seed systems for nonhybrid crops, such as sorghum, millet and groundnut, have proven to be even more challenging, given the lack of incentives for private sector investment in seed multiplication and distribution (Bagamba et al., 2022).In this article, we explore the idea that maize seed systems development can be accelerated when its goals and actions are coordinated with seed aid programming. For decades, governments and donors have sought to increase farmers' access to improved seed through seed aidthat is, the direct distribution of seed products to farmers by government agencies and NGOs. Seed aid has generally been discussed in terms of emergency and relief conditions that follow droughts, floods and civil wars (e.g., McGuire & Sperling, 2013;Sperling et al., 2008;Sperling & McGuire, 2010). However, government and donors have invested in seed aid during non-relief conditions as part of their strategies aimed at boosting agricultural production and productivity (e.g., Bramel and Remington, 2004;Spielman et al., 2012). NGOs and government programmes purchase seed directly from individual seed producers or seed companies and distribute it, either free or subsidized, to farmers (Sperling et al., 2008). Governments and NGOs may also provide vouchers to farmers to purchase seed products and other inputs at reduced costs from agrodealers (Aloyce et al., 2014). For the private seed industry, seed aid sales can represent a critical source of revenuefor example, recent data showed that NGO and select government programmes in Uganda comprised 63% of seed companies' maize seed sales, 67% of bean seed sales and 77% of sorghum seed sales (Mabaya et al., 2021).We know little about how NGOs and government agencies engage with maize seed companies and farmers for the implementation of seed aid in non-relief situations. Government and NGO seed purchases must involve decisions on the benefits and costs of responding to what farmers know and trust (e.g., high-selling products based on decades-old genetic technologies) versus sourcing newer, but perhaps lesser-known, products that are designed and tested to deliver higher performance under current growing conditions. How these trade-offs are negotiated have important implications for seed systems development and crop breeding but is not well understood.In general, a substantial body of literature has found that input subsidy programmes' beneficiary targeting is often inadequate or inappropriate. This occurs when subsidies are applied too widely (i.e., reaching farmers who would otherwise have access to quality seed without the aid), or when farmers are excluded from received aid based on eligibility criteria or other factors but still receive seed aid (e.g., through loopholes, fraud or corruption). In the case of fertilizer subsidies, poor targeting is thought to contribute to 'crowding out' (i.e., displacing) commercial sales (Jayne et al., 2013;Mather and Jayne, 2018;Ricker-Gilbert et al., 2013;Takeshima and Nkonya, 2014;Xu et al., 2009). While few studies have examined seed aid and seed subsidies' role in crowding in or crowding out commercial seed purchases (Mason and Ricker-Gilbert, 2013;World Bank, 2014), the concerns raised by fertilizer subsidies programmes are likely relevant.We argue that a targeted and coordinated seed aid programming agenda can advance maize seed systems development in multiple ways: i) greater gender equity and social inclusion in seed distribution, ii) distribution at scale of new products tailored to specific farmer requirements, and iii) local seed business development. Through a case study in Uganda, we looked to understand the implications of how seed aid was implemented in relation to formal maize seed systems development. To what extent did these programmes support varietal turnover, increased social inclusion and the development of local seed businesses? Our insights are based on interviews with representatives from seed companies, NGOs and government agencies. The following section explores the challenges facing seed systems development with a focus on maize. 'Materials and methods' section describes how we designed the study, while 'Results' section presents the results. We conclude with recommendations for how seed aid programmes might better support wider seed system goals.Researchers have raised concerns that new maize hybrids fail to equally reach women and the poorest farmers (e.g., Fisher et al., 2019;Fisher and Carr, 2015;Fisher & Kandiwa, 2014;Gebre et al., 2019;Kassa, 2013;Smale and Olwande, 2014). Researchers also have pointed to disparities in information and training access (Katungi et al., 2008;Mudege et al., 2018;Ragasa, 2014), women's limited access to required cash (Bourdillon et al., 2007;Mudege et al., 2015;Quisumbing and Pandolfelli, 2010), social constraints on mobility and agency (Galiè et al., 2017;Puskur et al., 2021), women's limited access to complementary resources such as land (Doss and Morris, 2001;Mudege et al., 2018) and gender-based differences in product preferences or perceptions about seed sources (Bourdillon et al., 2007;Kilwinger et al., 2020). In addition, maize seed companies and seed retailers lack incentives to target distribution and marketing efforts to groups that face price and material constraints (e.g., transport) for purchase. These discussions raise questions about the capacity of formal sector seed distribution pathways to support equitable uptake of new seed products and have generated increased attention to seed system accessibility.Development-oriented, government-and donor-funded maize breeding programmes in East and Southern Africa have, for decades, produced new, high yielding, stressresistant maize seed products (Cobb et al., 2019;Evenson and Gollin, 2003;Walker and Alwang, 2015). Despite evidence of these products' promising performance from on-station and on-farm trials (Worku et al., 2020), their sales continue to lag behind the sales of older, well-known maize seed products (Rutsaert and Donovan, 2020;Spielman and Smale, 2017). 'Varietal turnover' refers to farmers' replacement of an older seed product with a more recently developed improved one, a process that entails a genetic change (Spielman and Smale, 2017). In the case of hybrid maize, seed companies are expected play a critical role in this process by phasing out their stock of older products, thus enabling their replacement with newer products which have been designed and tested for higher performance. However, smaller-sized seed companies with limited marketing budgets may resist calls to limit their production and distribution of older seed products that generate important revenue streams. Recent evidence from Kenya showed that few farmers sought to purchase the latest, highest performing products (Rutsaert and Donovan, 2020), perhaps because varietal replacement generates relatively incremental yield gains but requires farmers to bear risk (Spielman and Smale, 2017). Achieving faster rates of varietal turnover is a priority for government-and donor-funded maize breeding programmes and, generally speaking, is considered important for farmers to achieve sustained yield gains in the face of increased variability in growing conditions (Atlin et al., 2017).Through careful selection of maize seed products, seed aid programmes have the potential to deliver large volumes of new products to farmers. Seed companies stand to benefit from wider distribution and increased awareness of their seed, brand recognition and promotion of new varieties, which could aid in varietal turnover in the medium to long term. Achieving these objectives relies, again, on NGO and government programme's careful targeting of underserved markets and quality assurance efforts to ensure minimal disruption of commercial sales or improved farmer trust of seed in the long term. It also necessitates effective labelling of distributed seed to increase brand awareness, cooperation and collaboration with seed companies in product selection to ensure that priority varieties are distributed, and deliberate facilitation of varietal turnover through prioritization of new, highperforming products.Direct seed aid and input subsidy programmes have been criticized for disrupting commercial seed sector operations with free and below-cost distributions (Mutonodzo-Davies and Magunda, 2011;Sperling and Remington, 2006;Sperling et al., 2008;Sperling and McGuire, 2010) and distribution of low quality seed that ultimately weakens product demand (Tripp and Rohrbach, 2001). However, seed aid programmes can also support formal seed systems development. For example, seed vouchers (Croft et al., 2021) can increase sales by agrodealers and help to expand their consumer base. Subsidy and direct seed aid programmes can generate bulk sales opportunities for the locally owned seed companies which may lack the financial and human resources required for business growth and development. During the initial stages of small-scale seed business development, bulk sales can provide much needed resources for product development, retail network establishment and expansion and direct-to-farmer marketing.Seed companies' dependence on sales to these programmes can be risky, however, as delayed payments can throw company accounts, especially in small businesses without significant alternative revenue streams, dangerously out of balance. Late or unplanned bulk orders can also disturb supply to build up retail networks. For NGO and government programmes to be effective partners in seed business development, transparent and predictable procurement processes must be in place to enable seed companies to plan.We conducted this study in Uganda, a country with an emerging maize seed industry and with high levels of government and NGO involvement in agricultural development. By recent estimates, Uganda's seed sector includes 23 seed companies, 19 of which produce and process their own seed (Mabaya et al., 2021). Relatively limited regulation of seed quality (Langyintuo et al., 2010), low levels of competition between agrodealers (Barriga and Fiala, 2020) and agrodealers' repackaging of inputs into smaller units have raised concerns about low input quality and seed counterfeiting (Bold et al., 2017). However, despite numerous seed adulteration scandals, maize seed purity and quality was assessed as fairly good, despite challenges with product mishandling and poor storage (Barriga and Fiala, 2020).Uganda has an active civil sector including NGOs engaged in humanitarian assistance and rural livelihoods development. The country is also a major seed provider for Sudanese refugees and their host communities. In 2019, 32% of total maize seed produced went to the national subsidy programme called Operation Wealth Creation (OWC), 31% to NGOs, 25% to agrodealers and 8% directly to farmers (Mabaya et al., 2021). Uganda's formal maize seed system thus depends, in significant part, on subsidy programmes and NGO and government seed purchases. Table 1 provides an overview of four government programmes in Uganda that engaged in seed aid around the time this study was implemented.Between April and May of 2022, we conducted stacked, semi-structured key informant interviews with representatives of seed businesses, NGOs and government agencies participating in seed aid programmes. We selected seed companies that represented diversity in terms of market share, production volume and past participation in government and NGO seed distribution programmes: three market leaders, two medium-scale and two small-scale companies were selected, each pair showing varied past engagement in government and NGO seed aid programmes. Interviews targeted either owners or senior staff responsible for marketing, distribution and/or contract decisions related to participation in seed aid programmes. These discussions sought to clarify the process through which seed companies engaged with the programmes, including selection of varieties to distribute, the importance of these distribution channels to their business model and marketing objectives, their motives in participating and their perceptions of costs and benefits. A representative from the Uganda Seed Trade Association was also interviewed on these topics. Interviews were conducted in English or in local languages (Luganda or Swahili) and took 60-80 min.Snowball sampling led to the identification of five NGOs and three government programmes to which companies supplied seed. Interviews were organized with staff at these organizations who were knowledgeable about seed procurement, programme objectives and implementation. In most cases, more than one person was interviewed at each NGO or programme office, as programming decisions and seed procurement were typically handled separately. Interviews covered programme objectives and operations, impact metrics, beneficiary targeting, details on procurement processes and perceptions of the programme's role in the wider seed system. Two local agricultural officers were also interviewed as their role in the product selection process became clear. Interviews took 30-60 min and were conducted in English or local languages. Where possible, interviews were backed by secondary data available in project reports, particularly for government programmes.Twelve focus group discussions with maize farmers (six with men and six with women) were organized in areas targeted by NGO and government seed programmes to gather farmer perspectives on programme targeting and reach. Communities were chosen based on partner contacts in the area, and six to ten farmers were invited to participate in each, aiming for diversity of landholding size and production orientation. In these groups, farmers were prompted to share experiences with NGO and government programmes distributing seed and their perceptions of these programmes and the seeds themselves. Focus groups were conducted in local languages and took 30-60 min.Key informant interviews were recorded and transcribed, while focus groups were recorded and detailed notes and representative quotes extracted. We applied deductive, iterative coding with the software Dedoose, and used top-down and bottom-up analysis of patterns and themes to analyse interview and focus group data. Ethics approval was obtained from CIMMYT (IREC.2022.034) and Makerere University (MAKSSREC 04.2022.544). Written consent was obtained from participants, using a witness in the case of illiteracy. Interviewees were not compensated but focus groups participants were offered refreshments and modest compensation for their time and transportation costs to ensure equal ability to participate.NGO and government programmes were the most reported seed sources for farmers. Focus group participants reported several problems with these programmes. A common theme was late delivery. One farmer reported that seed deliveries from OWC came 'when they think about us' rather than on a predictable schedule. Poor quality seed from these programmes also emerged from almost every discussion, although the perceived reasons for this were unclear. Most focus groups reported that farmers did not engage on the selection of products to be supplied to them through NGO and government programmes, in part due to their limited knowledge of product availability. Farmers in focus groups expressed appreciation for the ACDP voucher system, which reportedly provided farmers with higher quality seed and a full input package. 'They used to give better seeds compared to the ones from NAADS', said one farmer. 'In addition, what was good was how they gave us seeds. They gave us everything, a complete package of seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and tarpaulins'. Concerns about quality in ACDP were less common, suggesting the voucher-based distribution channel had been more effective at connecting famers with quality seed, although input delivery timelines again emerged as a concern. Farmers offered a few areas that could be improved in ACDP, including faster delivery, cheaper goods, improved market access and expanded eligibility for farmers without their own land (renters).While seed aid has its challenges, farmers' assessments of seed retail channels were also poor. Price was the most frequently cited challenge associated with commercial seedunsurprising in a context where seed had been distributed for free for so long. A second set of challenges associated with commercial seed related to seed quality, including sale of expired seed or seed that failed to germinate, and availability of preferred varieties in agrodealer shops, pointing to problems with the reliability of commercial seed supply chains. Quality concerns, availability constraints and limited farmer knowledge appeared to have eroded farmer trust in commercial seed.Focus groups underscored that farmer knowledge of seed companies and new products in Uganda was limited; when asked which seed companies sold high quality seed, one group pointed the researchers to shopkeepers as those who could best answer the questions. One women's group pointed the researchers to men, who typically acquired seed and reportedly had better knowledgeand indeed, men's focus groups were generally better able to identify seed companies operating in their area and seed products available to them.Many NGOs and NUSAF reported that they deliberately targeted the 'most vulnerable' districts, parishes and communities according to poverty indicators (also contributing to their focus on OPVs over hybrids). Focus groups corroborated this. Although no government programmes reported intentional targeting at the household or subhousehold level, one NGO representative stressed their participatory efforts to identify vulnerable households, and one focus group indeed alluded to NGO's prioritization of farmers who were considered to be most vulnerable. None of the seed aid programmes reported a deliberate focus on gender in their seed distributions.Several study participants felt non-commercial distribution channels inherently brought some social inclusion benefits. One mid-sized seed company cited last-mile delivery as a benefit of partnering with NGO programmes: 'Some of those NGOs reach even where we don't have an agrodealerthey are close to the ground and able to take products even to the lowest farmer who wouldn't access town'. However, wider access to quality seed in underserved areas appeared to be an incidental benefit. No seed companies reported that reaching underserved communities was a deliberate motivation behind their decisions to engage with these programmes.Government programmes, in contrast, reported a scattershot approach to targeting, making programmes widely accessible to commercialize agriculture while generating goodwill and political support among rural communities. Political considerations entered government seed distribution decisions at the sub-county scale, where a small proportion of seed was often set aside for members of parliament to allocate as they chose. This reportedly led to some duplication and poor targeting in distributions. Wide seed distribution had also become a challenge in recent years due to budget reductions and limited seed supplies; NAADS relied on extension officers to engage in beneficiary targeting at the district level, although the outcomes of this were unclear. In one focus group discussion, farmers reported that OWC seed distributions had become first-come, first-served.ACDP's targeting was more deliberate, as the programme put in place a cap on land ownership to help direct subsidies to potentially needy households. However, this requirement was not practically enforceable, a programme representative admitted. ACDP did mandate farmer co-fundingin advanceto receive subsidized inputs, which focus groups reported led to the exclusion of farmers with very limited financial resources. ACDP's use of an e-voucher system also had potential implications for women and the poorest farmers' ability to access and use the services. Seed companies, district government officers and an ACDP programme representative all relayed concerns about farmers' limited digital literacy, which led middlemen (often input vendors) to facilitate input ordering and thereby influence farmer choices and/or deliberately cheat them of their entitlements. Although ACDP reported that 42% of input buyers were women, concerns about fair and equitable engagement persisted.Most procurement programmes published lists of desired products in their tenders. The generation of product lists for most NGO and government programmes aimed to be grassroots-driven, with farmers theoretically requesting products they wanted. Extension agents and their contacts from the National Agricultural Research Organization of Uganda (NARO) played a key role in this process, especially for OWC. It was reported that extension agents were guided by farmers on choice of good seed, but only one focus group discussion reported community involvement in choosing seeds (and that only recently, through the PDM). One district-level procurement officer said that their decision to prioritize a specific product (i.e., Longe 10H) each year was based on knowledge of its performance and affordability, rather than assessment of farmer demand.NGO and government programmes offered seed companies the chance to propose alternative products. Some companies shared that they had proposed alternatives, but rarely with the intention to get newly launched products purchased by seed aid programming. Neither seed companies, government programmes, nor NGOs reported incentives to make available newly released seed products. Relationships between seed aid programmes and seed companies were perceived by both sides as transactional, with no evidence of collaboration on questions around turnover. A large-scale seed company representative explained the challenge in introducing new products through these programmes:They are all buying what they know; they are not going to buy what they don't know. A new product will raise a lot of questions. Even if you convince them, even if it has the lowest price but it is new to them, there is no incentive for them to take it. Especially with the government, they try as much as possible to collect data from the district and what is required, and people [farmers] will talk about what they know.The NGO and government seed programmes tended to promote and distribute both OPV and hybrid seed products. Focus groups indicated that the most common products supplied through government programmes were Bazooka and Longe 10H (both hybrids), while NGOs most commonly distributed Longe 5 (the market leading OPV) and Longe 10H. Few other products were mentioned in focus groups. Ultimately, it appeared that the demand-driven approach to varietal selection employed by most programmes meant that communities received well-known varieties that were requested by local agricultural officers, rather than new products introduced intentionally.Several NGOs and one government programme (NUSAF 3) sought primarily or exclusively OPVsa decision reported to be linked to their focus on community resilience, humanitarian relief and efforts to serve the most vulnerable, as well as constraints on their ability to deliver seeds to communities indefinitely. One NGO programme representative involved in product choice reported deep scepticism about the benefits of hybrid maize for smallholders: Scientists keep changing seed, time after time keep changing seed, so it brings discontentment into the minds of farmers… we encourage our farmers to produce for food security, we also encourage them to produce for income, and also keep some to be planted in the next season. You find that with most [hybrid] seed… the farmer is not enabled to create an environment where he can stand and sustain himself… So the farmer is forced to look back to us or to look back to the market to the seed producer…. [A hybrid] promotes the seed industry but not the farmer.Discussions with seed companies focused largely on the implications of NGO and government seed programmes for their business growth and development. Reported impacts were largely positive, with important caveats. All seed companies reported that their bulk sales to these programmes were a boon, as a small number of centralized sales were logistically simpler and more profitable than sales through agrodealer networks. These bulk sales helped companies settle accounts, particularly where outgrowers were involved in seed production. 'When you get an order from an NGO or government, you are sure, though there also some delays in payment, that when they put that transaction on your account at once, it helps you to clear off most of your [payments to outgrowers] and settle for the next season', said a small-scale seed company.Despite the benefits of direct sales to NGO and government programmes, seed companies reported variability in demand as a persistent challenge. Typically, NGO and government programmes released invitations for tenders and seed companies submitted bids to supply seed. Companies found procurement timelines and levels difficult to predict, however. '[Allocations to] government varies; some seasons they don't take, some seasons they take… if government offered you a contract, in that season, they will take the largest, almost all volume', a midsized seed company reported. Seed aid programme representatives attributed this variability to annual budgeting processes and demand assessments by local extension agents. In 2022, after NAADS's budget for seed procurement was slashed, purchase orders for seed companies were drastically reduced.Because tendering processes occurred when government and NGO programmes were ready to buy seed rather than when seed companies were planning production, companies' ability to tailor production to actual demand was limited. A representative of a mid-sized company said that bid winners were sometimes unable to meet their sales commitments, leading to inter-company seed sales that undermined quality control. Furthermore, intragovernmental coordination was lacking.'Our biggest challenge as the private sector, for all of us, is that there is no systematic planning from the government. The [end of the] financial year is coming in July, and we know OPM will require 1000 tons of seeds… then NAADS will come and say, \"For us we need this\", and then ACDP… If we would have that planning information given to us as a seed sector, it could be easy to manage'.Government programmes that undertook regular seed distributions (including NAADS and NUSAF programmes) reported working to announce invitations for tenders well in advance, but these timelines were not always adequate to inform companies' seed production decisions. NGO orders were typically said to be even less predictable.Furthermore, the tendering process meant seed companies had no guarantees to win a purchase order. Several government and NGO programmes had adopted prequalification processes and multi-year framework contracts with seed companies, which added some certainty. However, these tools primarily benefitted NGO and government actors by increasing confidence in seed companies' quality control and production capacity, rather than added certainty for seed companies concerning demand. Government programme representatives said that framework contracts, despite specifying quantities to be purchased over multiple years, were not always adhered to due to funding variability. Purchase orders could ultimately fall up to 25% above or below the level specified in a framework contract. Seed companies incurred losses if they resorted to selling carry-over seed as grain when purchase orders did not come through as expected.'Sometimes we are not able to determine whether the orders will actually come through or not. Sometimes you submit [a bid] and tell [the NGO or government programme], \"I can produce fifty metric tons of hybrid\", and boom! They give you twenty. Maybe you can sell twenty, so the other balance, now, that is where we … probably look out for other means on how to sell the balance'. (marketing manager, large scale company).As the number of seed companies engaged in seed aid programmes increased, one small company reported, certainty NGO and government sales eroded. Government programme representatives did not appear to perceive limited predictability of programme demand as a problem one explained that seed suppliers kept large stocks of seed and had ample other channels through which to distribute it, so variability in orders was not a concern.A further element of uncertainty in seed aid procurement related to limited transparency in purchasing processes. Seed companies rarely understood how final procurement decisions were made. For most NGOs and government programmes, standards were in place (and typically prequalification processes) to ensure that prospective seed suppliers were reputable enterprises with adequate production capacity and quality control systems. Beyond that, the primary criterion for evaluation of seed company bids was typically price. This was particularly true for smaller procurements and NGOs with strict budget constraints, which incentivized cheap seed production rather than rigorous quality control. One market-leading seed company reported that the focus on price has been a big issue in some programmes: 'For the NGOs, they count the numbers. They may take the cheapest supplier but then they have the issue with quality, purity'. Only for ACDP did seed companies report freely setting their desired prices.For larger procurements (notably government programmes), price was the primary consideration following verification of supplier capacity. Ultimately, however, large government programmes' purchase orders were often split among qualifying companies to improve the likelihood of timely delivery. This meant that the final purchase orders issued to seed suppliers were dependent on the size and nature of other purchase orders issued. While one market-leading company praised the splitting up of purchase orders as a way to avoid any one company 'monopolizing the business', a smaller seed company with little share in these programmes said that with government programmes, 'It's luck, very big luck'. A mid-sized company representative emphasized that they have no idea how tonnage is allocated among companies for programmes like OWC.Because NGO and government programmes published lists of desired seed products in invitations for tenders, entry into seed aid markets could be challenging for new or smaller-scale seed companies or companies promoting new products. Long-operating NGOs and government programmes already had a clear idea of which companies they want to source from, alleged a small seed company representative with limited engagement in these programmes: 'If they say they want Longe 5, in their mind, they know which company. They always have an idea'. Government programme representatives reported prioritizing medium-and large-scale seed suppliers due to trust in their production capacity, quality and reliability. This added opaqueness to the procurement process for small or new seed companies.According to seed companies, there was little evidence of 'crowding out' of commercial demand due to free or subsidized distributions. One large-scale company that had focused heavily on development of retail channels did criticize seed aid programmes' impacts:We have seen that these specific interventions have disrupted both the distribution chain as well as farmer decisions on how to buy seeds. Farmers were sitting back and waiting for the government to come in to get free seeds, so the retail sector went to square one. Many shops lost hope and they had to close, they had to divert the business into something else, and this was really a big problem. Currently we are seeing a new revival of agrodealer networks which is quite good and necessary for farmers, giving them a choice of buying seeds and inputs.Several companies noted that the ACDP voucher programme had increased farmers' seed choices without disrupting commercial channels as much as direct seed aid. ACDP allowed seed companies to set their preferred prices and required co-funding by farmers, reducing the likelihood that farmers would resell free or highly subsidized seed. However, one mid-sized seed company expressed a preference for direct procurement over the voucher system, as ACDP strained their capacity by requiring their direct involvement in decentralized distribution of seed. The numerous flaws in ACDP's rollout also generated widespread criticism and had contributed to the withdrawal of many companies from the programme. Still, the voucher model attracted much praise from seed suppliers.NGO and government programme representatives appeared to have limited awareness of the seed retail sector in areas where seed aid systems operated, but reported that the commercial sector did not adequately serve seed aid programmes' target beneficiaries. For instance, one NGO representative said they were generally aware of commercial operations in their target regions but did not feel they infringe upon these: '[Agrodealer outlets] are only established in those big towns, and… our farmers are deep in the villages, to the extent that accessing towns is quite hard. That's why at least we tend to give them the seed or they go to the local markets'. Many NGO and government programme representatives pointed out that their seed distributions are particularly important for vulnerable community members like those in female-headed households with limited mobility.Rather than feeling 'crowded out' by seed aid, most companies were pleased with the brand awareness generated through their engagement with NGO and government programmes. Seed aid packages in Uganda were legally required to include company branding and product information. Several companies offered examples of cases where new products were rapidly picked up or where the company entered a new market through seed aid programmes. 'I know we had incidences of supplies going to NAADS and the farmers were so happy because germination was high and products performed well, so the [subsidised] packs sparked some sales within the regions', reflected a market-leading company representative. A medium-sized seed company listed numerous districts that they had been able to reach thanks to collaboration with NAADS, beyond their retail operations:'You find they cover beyond where we could not have reached. So you find that if government has given you an order, and even they pay you to transport your product all the away to Ishaka, where you probably wouldn't have reached by your own financial capacity'.The same company reported reaching several remote districts through NGO partners as well, and a clear instance of demand creation. 'We went to [two remote] areas through an NGO', said their representative. 'They invited us to exhibit in their farmers' show they had. We went and participated, spread our product, and we have been taking farmers' calls direct, saying they want supplies, individually'. This was not an uncommon story among seed companies.A more worrying impact on the commercial sector related to the effect seed aid programmes have had on seed companies' distribution strategiesnotably their prioritization of sales to NGO and government programmes despite aid programmes' unpredictable budgets and shifting approaches. Several companies interviewed made it clear that NGO and government programmes' bulk purchases came first, and remaining stock was distributed through retail channels. The draw of NGO and government procurement options was irresistible, even for more established companies.'We are entirely focusing on the little markets. Having said that, yes, you may focus on the little markets, but if there is an opportunity to make a sale to an NGO, government entity or other well-wisher, it becomes sensible for us to do it. If we don't do it, our competition will do it, then we are out of business'.When asked how companies balanced involvement in NGO and government programmes with retail operations, some were quick to emphasize their prioritization of retail channelsif not in terms of actual seed allocations, then in terms of company strategy. However, other companies appeared to have dedicated little attention to retail channels to date. For instance, one small-scale company representative emphasized that balancing retail and seed aid programme participation was not a consideration: 'It's just the packaging [that changes]when we produce seed, we don't care that it went to government or what… we can pack almost 90% of [what's produced] in small packs if the demand is there. We can also pack in big packs if the demand is there'.A large-scale company representative said that NGO and government sales were enabling them to invest more in retail channels:The seed business, especially for you to perfect your distribution network, it calls for a lot of investment. So our whole main idea is to build and grow with the primary off-takers [seed aid programmes] that we look forward to; we take advantage of what is available to give us revenue. So it may look as though we much interested in dealing with NGOs and government, but that is only to leverage to help us build this other [retail] side.Seed demand from NGO and government programmes had long been variable, but in 2022, Ugandan seed aid programmes were at a turning point. The NUSAF 3 project ended, direct procurement by NAADS scaled back as MAAIF shifted focus to voucher systems and decentralized procurement via the PDM programme, and many relief and development NGOs appeared to be shifting away from direct procurementoften towards seed demonstrations, local seed enterprise development and Quality Declared Seed. Seed companies' dependence on bulk purchasing thus appeared increasingly risky. In response to these changes, most seed companies were increasing their focus on retail. However, seed company comments and farmer complaints about variable seed availability at agrodealers indicated that development of a healthy commercial seed sector may have been hampered by long-term prioritization of seed aid programmes.The findings presented here provide insights into the potential for seed aid programmes to support Uganda's maize seed system development, including growth of the commercial seed sector, varietal turnover and equitable seed access. We now reflect on how seed aid programmes operated in relation to these seed system development objectives.Supporting commercial seed operations and improving the equity of seed access in Uganda both depend on effective beneficiary targeting, which should ensure that seed aid and subsidy programmes reach under-served populations with minimal disruption to retail operations. While several NGO programmes and one government agency reported intentional targeting of vulnerable regions and communities, there was minimal evidence of targeting vulnerable individuals within those communitiesi.e., women and the poorest farmers. In the few cases of deliberate household targeting, this process was delegated to local government, NGO actors or participatory wealth ranking approaches, all of which allow for flexibility as well as possible co-optation. Only ACDP appeared to have clear eligibility criteria in place for subsidy recipients, although a programme representative stated that those screening criteria were largely unenforceable.None of the NGO and government programmes showed much understanding of commercial seed operations in their target areas, especially not an understanding grounded in any deliberate assessment of retail sector capacity. Seed companies also did not see NGO and government programmes as an explicit means to reach regions and communities under-served by retail channels. Still, reaching under-reached populations appeared to be an incidental benefit for seed companies, as NGOs in particular provided last-mile delivery to remote locations. Many seed companies were able to point to explicit instances of demand creation ('crowding in') through participation in NGO and government programmes. Few complained about 'crowding out' of demand, in contrast to much prior research on input subsidy programmes (Jayne et al., 2013;Mather and Jayne, 2018;Ricker-Gilbert et al., 2013;Takeshima and Nkonya, 2014;Xu et al., 2009). It is unclear to what extent this was simply because strong retail channels that might be disrupted by seed aid were not present in Uganda in the first place.Most worrying were the targeting practices for large-scale government seed distributions through NAADS, which appeared to be motivated primarily by the objective of reaching as many farmers as possible. Instead, in the clearest sign that these distributions are politicized, a portion of OWC seed was openly diverted to local members of parliament for distribution. In none of the NGO and government programmes were deliberate targeting practices implemented to ensure that seed aid and subsidy programmes complemented rather than undermined the seed retail sector and expanded equitable access to improved seed. Thus, the possibility of inadequately targeted seed aid 'crowding out' emerging commercial operations persists.Ensuring that NGO and government seed aid programmes support varietal turnover goals requires some degree of cooperation and collaboration between these actors and seed companies, as well as product selection processes deliberately oriented towards turnover. Neither of those conditions appeared present in Ugandan seed aid programmes. Seed procurement processes were highly transactional, with neither seed suppliers nor NGO or government buyers invested in the product selection process. In most cases, although NGO and government programmes published product lists for procurement, seed suppliers could propose substitutes. However, seed companies rarely opted to push new products.While most seed aid programmes implemented a demand-driven seed procurement process, there is a clear trade-off between this approach and varietal turnover goals. Very likely, product selection procedures and policies need to be revisited to assess if and how varietal turnover goals might be balanced with existing demand-driven approaches, ensuring farmers' needs and priorities are met while allowing promising new varieties to enter the market. 'Demand-driven' varietal selection in the programmes examined here evidently involved more discussions between local agricultural officers and NARO staff than direct engagement with farmershowever, farmers' limited knowledge of varieties means their engagement would not be likely to contribute to varietal turnover, either. If NARO and local agricultural officers are the ultimate decision-makers, there is need to ensure that these individuals are attuned to challenges of varietal turnover and clear about new varieties' potential benefits. The latter would require varietal performance data to be more readily and publicly available than it typically is.The results also suggested that procurement processes, despite recent improvements, still present obstacles to seed companies. The late release of tender invitations does not typically allow seed companies to plan production in advance, and issuance of purchase orders remains somewhat unpredictable. Both factors leave seed suppliers at heightened risk of carry-overs. However, as both government and NGO players appear to be moving away from direct procurement and distribution models, greater focus should be on public-private collaboration in the development of new models, including voucher programmes and the PDM approach, to support seed business development.Experiences with ACDP's e-voucher programme provide important lessons. Seed companies appreciated that the e-voucher approach allowed them to set their own prices and left seed choices in the hands of farmers, although digital literacy constraints meant that farmers' choices were not always honoured. Decentralized distributions for the e-voucher programme proved a burden for many seed suppliers, especially smaller companies. Identifying ways to facilitate the involvement of smaller enterprises in voucher programmes is of critical interest but requires acknowledgement by NGO and government programmes that seed business development matters.All the above concernsthe need for complementary beneficiary targeting, more intentional product selection, and the improved functioning of procurement and distribution processes to support seed companies' growthcan and should be addressed through increased collaboration between seed companies and NGO and government seed aid programmes, CGIAR and NARES breeding programs, as well as government agricultural extension programs. The interviews conducted for this study indicate that this cooperation has been lacking.The seed aid programmes were principally motivated by objectives unrelated to seed systems development, so were typically designed without input from the wider seed sector and implemented without attention to seed systems development goals. The Uganda Seed Trade Association learned about the PDM programme through a press release, their representative shared. They and their members were left scrambling to understand how seed suppliers fit into the new approach. One government programme representative admitted, 'Every year we review what happened in each season, and we also support those [seed suppliers] who had challenges in receiving money so we follow up, and then we plan for the next season about what should we do better. But I think it's the first time as a project we were really engaging with private sector'.This lack of historic coordination has meant that seed companies have had to repeatedly adapt to work within programme structures that are designed without their own needs and constraints in mind; there have been few opportunities for seed companies to engage directly with these programmes to discuss challenges, complementarities and shared objectives. Greater collaboration will be critical to improved linkages between these programmes and seed system development objectives.In this study, we explored the design and implementation of maize seed aid programmes in non-relief situations and the implications of these programmes for development of formal maize seed systems. The results showed that seed aid programmes had no deliberate focus on varietal turnover and minimal attention to social inclusiontwo factors required for future maize seed systems development. Limited coordination between public, private and civil sector actors instead appeared to constrain the potential 'social goods' generated through these efforts.Improved coordination in aid recipient targeting, product selection and seed business engagement will be essential to improve the outcomes of interventions in both seed aid and seed systems development in Uganda. Farmers and extension agents will require more information on the seed products available and their performance across different agroclimatic zones. Innovation in the targeting of seed aid will be critical for seed aid to deliver on the larger development goals upon which seed aid is justified, as well as for crop breeding and seed systems development to support increased social inclusion. The use of digital communication systems has the potential to improve targeting, as well as coordination among the key players (e.g., seed companies, agrodealers and government agencies). Careful monitoring of the effects of seed aid on the performance of seed businesses should be considered. Seed aid can contribute positively to local seed business development when the seed aid purchases are time bound and designed to support brand recognition for newly launched products, when purchases are planned with sufficient lead time to allow companies flexibility to meet the demands of seed aid programmes and commercial clients, and when seed aid is complemented with other types of support designed to build capacities for seed production and marketing."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4607596633.json b/main/part_2/4607596633.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7405dc9242b42076c1dbfd5903aaa04c709ea820 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4607596633.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f86889b10bbe3c2c13432b9702f5bfba","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/30a14b7b-818a-4afb-807b-347769303ef1/retrieve","id":"1151336887"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"eefb3d3d-56f1-48ad-a581-b68c06712018","content":"The parts used must not misrepresent the meaning of the publication. ILRI would appreciate being sent a copy of any materials in which text, photos etc. have been used.The training workshop was offered by ILRI in response to an important component of the Safe Food, Fair Food (SFFF) for Cambodia project on gender equity in the pork value chain in Cambodia.In Cambodia, most animal-source food products are produced by smallholders, many of them women, and sold in traditional open markets where women also predominate as retailers. However, value chain interventions have tended to favour men because they control the money from sales. Women who do much of the work are poorly recognized and receive fewer benefits. Integrating gender in programs and projects aims to reduce gender gaps and enhance women's participation in the economic development and women's empowerment.As such, an important component of the SFFF for Cambodia projects is understanding the gender issues that will allow pork production and consumption to become safer. This covers both the more practical understanding of the diverse gender roles being played in pork but also how to empower men and women both to profit from pork.The objectives of the workshop are:• For the whole team to understand and be comfortable with the concepts and terminology of gender, so as to have a common understanding of the issues; • To identify with the team the emerging gender issues and solutions that need to be addressed in the project; • To identify the capacity within the team to support the gender work;• To develop a gender activity plan, identifying responsibilities and interlinkages between various outputs within the project;It is expected that at the end of the workshop participants would (i) increase their general understanding on gender issues as well as their capacity to address more specific gender issues related to livestock projects and programmes, (ii) get knowledge on how to carry out gender analysis to effectively and efficiently work with rural men and women to respond to their different needs, priorities and constraints at the grassroots level. This enhanced gender analysis capacity will benefit future planning, implementation and monitoring of livestock projects and programmes.The workshop was held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia on 22-23 January 2018 and organized by ILRI in partnership with the Cambodia National Animal Health and Production Research Institute (NAHPRI) and the Centre for Livestock and Agriculture Development (CelAgrid). There were nine trainees (6 male and 3 female) drawn from research, academia, universities, state agencies and NGOs.Day 1 was designed to introduce the participants to the general concepts about gender and sex, provide a background on both livestock and livelihoods in Cambodia, as well as gender issues in the country. It was emphasized that little data are available specifically related to gender and livestock in these countries, and that much future research on this topic needs to be conducted. The afternoon session included practical exercise on analysing livestock value chains for gender constraints and opportunities based on knowledge gained from the morning session. They started to map out the work areas and identifying gender gaps and opportunities for project interventions. Participants were encouraged to think of how each of the workshop sessions could be applied to their work and how best to share the workshop information with colleagues.Day 2 focused on engaging participants in learning about the importance of gender analysis, why and how it can be done, and providing tools in doing simple gender analysis.Participants learned methods of analysis through specific livestock case studies, how to integrate gender issues into project design and evaluation, as well as participatory strategies for more effectively engaging women in the projects' activities. Participants also had a look at some specific entry points to gender and food safety related to safe pork. The final session engaged participants in setting up the plan of action to cover and integrate gender issues into their livestock project.The training was facilitated by Nicoline de Haan, senior researcher and leader of the gender team at ILRI. She has over 15 years of expertise in gender, rural livelihoods, agriculture and natural resource management. Before ILRI, she led the work on gender, poverty and institutions under the CGIAR research program on Water, Land and Ecosystems examining the implications of inequity in access and control over natural resources, and finding options to ensure inclusive benefit sharing. At the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations she led the global socio-economic team on animal health, where her main responsibility was reducing the impact of animal diseases on the livelihoods of smallholders. She has a master's in development sociology from Wageningen Agricultural University and a PhD in rural sociologist from University of Missouri, Colombia. Email: n.dehaan@cgiar.org"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4619851895.json b/main/part_2/4619851895.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c39552a1a04c8d7deefcc8f252a40ee7d0f170f --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4619851895.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9181129854c191a20fcacffff754b9cd","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d592e8dc-0ca1-4ff2-a2e3-0ffaaeb2dd14/retrieve","id":"243316415"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7dbce50c-77d0-4a0c-989e-5ef345cf7142","content":"When changes are made in a landscape, changes are made to the microclimate. When farmers plant trees in or around their field, and when communities dig bunds to improve water retention, they change the local climate around them. Microclimate is a result of the interaction between the local topography, landscape characteristics and the regional climate.In the global climate change debate, adaptation and mitigation are dominant concepts. The challenge is to create production systems that can withstand rising temperature and exacerbating weather events, while finding ways to sequester carbon from the air. Meanwhile, microclimates go largely unobserved and unattended. In view of the climate change that exists today, this is a huge missed opportunity. Micro-climate management offers much potential as a third way next to adaptation and mitigation that builds ecosystem resilience and brings positive impact for agricultural systems and biodiversity. Focusing on the microclimate is a pro-active approach to improve the landscape. Compared to global \"When the century began, neither human numbers nor technology had the power radically to alter planetary systems. As the century closes, not only do vastly increased human numbers and their activities have that power, but major, unintended changes are occurring in the atmosphere, in soils, in waters, among plants and animals, and in the relationships among all of these. The rate of change is outstripping the ability of scientific disciplines and our current capabilities to assess and advise.\"The Brundtland Report, 1987 and regional climate scenarios, microclimates in landscapes are almost entirely unstudied (Chen et al. 1999).There is little chance that humans in the near future will be able to modify the climate, most notably temperatures, on any large scale (Gliessman 2015). However, when zooming in on landscapes and the agro-ecological systems within them, there is much that can be done, to the extent that a large share of the effects of global climate change can be buffered by building the microclimatic resilience of the landscape. Resilience has gained much importance as an overarching concept in the analysis of human-environment interactions and the way in which humans are affected by environmental change processes (Janssen & Ostrom 2006). Holling (1973) was the first to introduce resilience in relation to the stability of ecosystems. The Resilience Alliance defined it as \"the capacity of a system to tolerate disturbance without collapsing into a qualitatively different state that is controlled by a different set of processes. A resilient system can withstand shocks and rebuild itself when necessary\" (Walker & Salt 2006).This Practical Note seeks to understand the interaction between different microclimate factors and also aims to offer examples of microclimate management interventions. Microclimate is composed out of a myriad of climatic conditions that come together in localised areas on the earth's surface (Chen et al. 1999). It is critical to recognise the unique nature of microclimate of different zones, such as forests and fields, and the influence of such zones on landscape processes. In the end, microclimate is a determining factor in ecological processes as varied as plant regeneration and growth, soil respiration, nutrient cycling, and wildlife habitat, and is related to the spread of diseases, insects and natural disturbances such as fire. The term microclimate is often applied to space scales up to 100 m, which is followed by the mesoclimate that has a range up to 100 km (Foken 2008).In the first section, the various microclimate components and their relationships are discussed. In the second part, microclimate management interventions are listed that together have potential to affect productive functions and transform landscapes.Figure 1: various climate scales and associated phenomena (Source: Foken 2008) provides the building blocks for understanding how different management practices can transform the landscape, and how interventions can better be implemented for current and future needs.Soil moisture available for crops is determined by the soil's water storage capacity and the addition of water to a soil, which again is determined by its texture, structure, depth, organic matter content and biological activity. The texture of a soil determines its water storage capacity and influences the transfer of heat that can result in the loss and movement of moisture. Texture is determined by the relative amount of clay, silt and sand particles in the soil (Gliessman 2015). Figure 4 shows the different types of soil that are formedMicroclimates are the localised, dynamic interplays between different processes in the surface layer, such as energy and matter exchange, radiation processes and effects of the underlying surface (Foken 2008). These again are determined by the specific landscape, soil conditions, vegetation, land use and water retention. The microclimate determines the moisture available in the soil and air to the different ecosystems, the presence of dew and frost, the actual temperatures for plant growth and germination, the vigour of soil biotic life, capacity to fixate nitrogen by soil biota and the occurrence of pests and diseases.This section provides an overview of the various factors that determine the microclimate. Understanding the main characteristics of these factors, and how these can influence each other Soil texture, soil organic matter and biological activity at the surface and in the ground, together form the soil structure. The structure is related to the formation of micro-and macro-aggregates, being the ways in which the different particles are held together. A good structure can help resist wind and water erosion, as well as increase water percolation and storage capacity (Gliessman 2015). In addition, the soil's moisture retention capacity is influenced by its organic content. An increase in the organic carbon content improves the water retention capacity when soils are sandy, while it decreases the water retention capacity in fine-textured soils such as clay. For soils with an initial high carbon content, an increase of organic carbon increases their water retention capacity in any case (Rawls, 2003). Thus, an increase in organic matter can be beneficial, especially for coarse soils.The type of soil and soil moisture have an important effect on erosion. Sandy soils hardly clump together, and are thus more susceptible to erosion. Silt and clay soils on the other hand form stronger aggregates. They are made up of smaller particles however. Soil moisture plays an important role in bonding soil particles, and helps to reduce wind erosion. from these relative amounts. These particles each have different properties that influence the uptake of water and the transfer of energy and heat.Clay particles are the smallest particles, have the highest surface area, and have most potential to absorb water. Sand has the largest particles and the lowest water absorption capacity (Bonan 2016). Thus, sandy soils will usually have lower moisture availability and a higher evaporation rate than clay soils. However, clay soils can harden in drought-prone areas, which will decrease Box 1: Soil moisture availability and sowbugs Sowbugs are crustaceans, 20 -25 mm long and 5 mm wide, that are common to the arid flood spreading areas of Iran, such as the Gareh Bygone plains. They are ecosystem engineers as they can change the soil structure by altering the soil compaction through the creation of pore spaces that allow for better water infiltration. By burrowing in the soil, sowbugs ensure that soils in floodplains are not sealed by fine sediment. They help to aerate the soil and provide avenues for soil infiltration of water. Soil that are burrowed by the sowbug have higher organic matter, better structure, and are more resistant to erosion than other soils in the area. In the Gareh Bygone plains, their role is essential in forming macro-networks, and facilitating soil moisture and groundwater recharge rates (MetaMeta 2011). This allows water users in the floodplains to have groundwater available during a prolonged period of the year. The movement of water in the soil is determined by infiltration, percolation, evaporation, transpiration and hydraulic lifting. Infiltration is the addition of water to a soil from precipitation or irrigation.Once infiltrated water saturates the upper soil layers, gravity pulls the water downwards, called percolation. Evaporation from the soil surface draws water upwards through capillary action, as the water deficit that is created at the soil surface attracts deeper water molecules. Similarly, plantFrom the Andes to Amazonia, raised fields known as Suka Kollus (Bolivia) and Waru-Waru (Peru) can be found, being an agricultural technique in flood-prone mountain plains that were used by pre-Columbian societies (Lombardo et al. 2011). The canals around the fields, when filled with water, act as a water buffer against prevailing night frost, and provide moisture for crops.This is achieved by letting the sunlight heat up the water stored in the canals between the raised fields. The stored heat is released at night, generating moisture which will be available as condensed water to the crops (Lhomme & Vacher 2003). According to Roldán and colleagues (2004) the moisture raises the relative humidity by 3.3 percent, compared to the surrounding plains.Depending of the soil texture, plant coverage, soil humidity and depth, raised fields and surrounding areas present temperature differences. This is described by Lhomme & Vacher (2003) in figure 7. The soil temperature in the suka kollus shows lower temperature variability in relation to the pampas system. In the study, the diurnal temperature range for the pampas was found to be between 10.7 -20 o C, while in the suka kollus, the temperature laid between 11.5 -18 o C (Angelo et al. 2008). The moderate temperatures of suka kollus' soils improve their resilience against extreme climates. plant growth, but also affects weather patterns and local rainfall patterns. On the contrary, when there is only limited soil moisture more energy is available for sensible heating and near-surface air temperatures increase. In the past decade, there has been much research on the relationship between a lack of soil moisture and the occurrence of extreme temperatures and heat waves, both at the local and regional scale (Seneviratne et al. 2010). The balancing influence of soil moisture also counts for low temperatures as well, as wet soils stay warm longer than dry soils during frost events.When a good level of soil moisture is available soil biotic life can prevail. Micro-organisms break down organic matter and release nutrients, which contributes to soil fertility. Optimal conditions are met when moisture takes up around 60 percent of the available water pore space. An excess of water prevents the supply of oxygen, which can lead microbial activity to slow, stop, or turn anaerobic, which will have negative effects on plant growth (Bot & Benites 2005b). Hence, in areas with regular flooding, proper drainage is required to ensure good soil fertility. Furthermore, excess water can cause nutrients to be lost due to leeching. On the other hand, low moisture levels decrease enzyme activity, which will hamper nutrient releasing processes. Nitrogen cycling is especially affected, already being a limiting nutrient in many soils (Sardans & Peñuelas 2005).Soil temperature is determined by incoming radiation, and thermal conductivity and heat capacity of the soil. The extent to which incoming radiation is absorbed or reflected is influenced by soil colour. Darker soil tends to absorb a higher fraction of solar radiation, while lighter soils tend to reflect radiation and to be cooler. Thermal transpiration creates a water deficit around the root zones, as water is absorbed through the root hairs.The speed at which capillary action can move water in the soil depends on the water deficit at the surface layer or around the plant roots, and on the soil type as well. Most sandy soils facilitate a rapid movement, as pore spaces are bigger and hold water less tightly. However, as the capillary movement takes place against gravity, finely textured soils like clay can provide better conditions to facilitate the upward movement of water and hence reach higher (Brouwer et al. 1985). This water movement is part of the diurnal and seasonal cycle. For the diurnal cycle, the water deficit in the soil which is created during the day is compensated for by water movement during the night, given the availability of groundwater.Upward movement of water through the soil can occur up to several months after the last precipitation. In areas dominated by one or two wet seasons, this ensures water availability after the rainy season has ended, thus enabling a second cropping period. The availability of water is further influenced by the depth at which soil moisture can be found. Some of the available soil moisture will be at a depth that is not reachable for some plants, while it is available to others.Soil moisture is one of the most important microclimate determinants. The thermal conductivity and heat capacity of the soil is greatly increased when soil moisture is present (Bona 2016).Evapotranspiration is the process of transferring water from the surface to the atmosphere, which takes a high amount of energy compared to heating the air. Thus, areas with available soil moisture have a more balanced microclimate with lower air and soil temperatures. This not only facilitates freezing at night. Sandy soils generally have a higher thermal conductivity, while clay soils have a lower one. The thermal conductivity and heat capacity of various soil types are shown in table 3 (Nicholson 2012).While heat capacity is very similar between sandy, clay and peat soils, the presence of soil moisture creates large differences. Deserts generally have sandy soils and low soil moisture. In effect, this means that high thermal conductivity exists, while having a low heat capacity. Heat flows in and out of the soil at a high rate, contributing to high soil temperatures during the day and low temperatures at night.Heat transfer into the soil during the day transports heat away from the direct surface and leads to lower temperatures. When the surface is cooler at night, the soil's heat transfer direction is reversed, and heat is released to the surface, thereby balancing out extremes. The same process also occurs over longer time scales, with heat being stored during warmer months and released in colder months (Bonan 2016). Soil temperature influences crop growth by providing the warmth necessary for seeds, plant roots and micro-organisms in the soil. High soil temperatures can negatively affect plant growth, while extreme temperatures can stall biological processes of micro-organisms (FAO 2016). On the other hand, low soil temperatures inhibit water uptake by plants, inhibit nitrification and thereby reducing soil fertility, and increase desiccation when simultaneously air temperatures are higher (Gliessman 2015). Both high and low soil temperatures play a distinct role by increasing or decreasing evapotranspiration from plants. Soil moisture plays a key role, as higher soil moisture will lead to evaporation, taking a higher amount of energy and thus lowering local temperatures during the day, while increasing surface temperatures during the night.Incoming and outgoing radiation is the most important determinant of local air temperature.There are several on-site characteristics and modifications possible. Local vegetation can increase transpiration, which lowers the local temperature and increases humidity. Vegetation can also provide shading, (partially) decreasing radiation from reaching lower situated plants or surface levels. Using the cooling effect of moisture conductivity is the rate in which a soil transfers heat, and a higher conductivity means that radiation can flow in and out of the soil at a higher rate. In other words, it indicates the speed at which a soil heats up and cools down. Soils with high thermal conductivity lose energy faster, and thus cool down quicker. This is important to understand the movement of water and the formation of dew. Heat capacity deals with the ability of a soil to store heat. This can be noticed during colder nights, when heat slowly releases from the soil and heats the surface air. In highlands, soil moisture is used to help reduce frost occurrence. However, when temperatures are continuously low, frost heaving can occur. The expanding ice in the soil then causes the ground to swell (Bonan 2016).Factors that determine thermal conductivity and heat capacity of the soil are the soil texture or mineral composition, porosity, soil moisture and organic matter. The presence of soil moisture greatly increases the thermal conductivity, as water is twenty times more conductive than air (Bonan 2016). Soil organic matter has a very low thermal conductivity when compared to the mineral soils, and thus acts as an insulating agent that keeps heat out of the soil during the day, and prevents heat from escaping during the night. This prevents moisture from evaporating during the day, while preventing soil temperatures from going below (Nicholson 2012). However, more evapotranspiration also takes place in forests, which transmits heat back into the air in the form of water vapour. This shows that several conflicting factors lead to warming and cooling effects from different kinds of land use, making it not a simple task to determine effects on the microclimate.While the overall air temperature is a result of various radiation processes taking place, conditions in the temperature profile within a few meters from the surface change rapidly. Temperature, as well as moisture and wind, is affected by surface processes and properties with which it interacts. Vegetation changes the radiation balance through shading, while being a barrier to wind (Gliessman 2015).Figure 10 shows the typical daily temperature cycle in a forest. The maximum air temperature occurs in the upper crown, usually about one to two hours after local noon (Foken 2008). Below the crown, the daytime temperatures are lower. At night, minimum temperatures occur in the upper crown due to the cooling of the earth's surface and the air near the ground, called radiation cooling. This particularly happens with a clear sky, calm wind and low humidity. Particularly in the evening, a forest is warmer than its surroundings.The air temperature range, and diurnal and seasonal fluctuations, play a large role in determining the local flora and fauna. All organisms have an optimum temperature for growing, and their minimum and maximum temperature thresholds in the soil to decrease the overall air temperature can mean increased crop yields through mitigating extreme temperatures. The incoming and outgoing radiation balance shows the input of energy into the system that is used for crucial processes such as warming the air and soil, photosynthesis, and evapotranspiration.Local albedo is the reflectivity of a surface and determines how much radiation is absorbed. It plays a large role in determining local air temperatures, and can vary greatly according to the local conditions. Local topography plays a large role in determining the incoming radiation. Aspect, being the direction a slope is facing, influences the amount of radiation received as well as shading. Soil albedo is mainly determined by the moisture content. The interaction between rainfall and air temperature is important, as precipitation changes the local albedo and provides moisture for evaporation. In general, a dry soil has higher albedo than a wet soil. Croplands have a higher albedo than forests, meaning that croplands reflect more sunlight back into the atmosphere, resulting in lower surface heat (Jackson et al. 2008). Vegetation and organic Dew occurs when the temperature at the surface is lower to or equals the dew point temperature. Air moisture in the form of water vapour then condenses on a colder surface to form dew (Agam & Berliner 2006). Dew needs a relatively cold surface upon which it can be deposited. Fog occurs when the atmospheric water vapour concentration reaches the saturation point, regardless of conditions at the surface. Thus, fog is a purely atmospheric process.The deposition of moisture is caused by settling and interception, rather than the formation of droplets at a cool surface. Many of the effects of fog deposition are like those of dew deposition.Air humidity, combined with temperature changes during the diurnal cycle, can lead to dew formation. Dew can be an important source of moisture for plant growth in arid and semi-arid environments.There are a number of local examples (Nicholson 2012). In the Andes, 5 -10 mm a year is accumulated, while in the Negev desert, where most dew research has taken place, dew forms on 200 nights a year, with a total of 30 mm a year. Dew is used directly through leaf surface absorption, reduces transpiration and can kickstart photosynthesis in the early hours due to leaf water saturation (Tomaszkiewicz et al. 2014). Air moisture can thus serve as an important addition to the water that plants require, especially in arid and semi-arid regions (Agam & Berliner 2006). Dew also affects the albedo, both of soils and plant canopies. While it moistens, and darkens the soil, lowering its albedo, it leaves a reflective surface on leaves, increasing their albedo.High air humidity slows down transpiration from plants, since humid air does not absorb water vapour as easily as dry air does. Here, the presence of local wind is essential to mix the local atmosphere as it transports humid air away from vegetation (Nicholson 2012;Bonan 2016). High air humidity, in combination to changes in the air temperature can lead to rainfall in a landscape, in case circumstances make air humidity reach saturation point.Local winds also play a role in dew formation.While light wind was found to help dew formation in unsheltered sites, moderate to strong winds were found to inhibit dew formation (Richards 2004). The presence of vegetation that acts as a windbreak or provides shade plays a role in the formation and duration of dew. By lessening wind speeds, windbreaks can assist in the formation of dew, but also reduce it as local warmer air layers are not removed. The shade from vegetation helps to reduce local surface temperatures, which vary for different growing stages. For example, maize development is hindered above 35 o C, while rice has maximum temperature threshold between 36 -40 o C. When these are exceeded, growth is delayed or even prevented, which can result in yield losses or even plant loss, even in cases where sufficient water is present. For shade crops, such as coffee, the effect is even more strongly pronounced. The optimal range of Arabica is 18 -21 o C, with reduced photosynthesis between 24 -34 o C, and no photosynthesis above that (Lin 2007). Extreme heat causes plant processes to shut-down. As the release of moisture from transpiration is inhibited, and possible further heat stress is caused (Luo 2011;Gliessman 2015). Higher air temperatures also have an influence on the spread and effects of pests and diseases, as plants become more susceptible to disease (Beresford & Fullerton 1989).Air humidity is the result of evapotranspiration, which is induced by available radiation and moisture. It is the basis for cloud, fog and dew formation. The air temperature determines the amount of water vapour the air can hold, with warm air being able to hold more water vapour than cold air. Warmer weather promotes evaporation, which in turn increases air humidity.Relative humidity is a measure of the ratio of water vapour in the air compared to the amount of water vapour the air can hold. A relative humidity of 25 percent thus indicates that the air is holding 25 percent of the total water vapour it could hold.A relative humidity of 100 percent means the air is saturated, and mist, fog and clouds will start to form. At smaller scales, changes in temperature can push the relative humidity to 100 percent, reaching dew point temperature (Gliessman 2015). night, the direction reverses as winds blow towards the warmer water surface. With regards to mountains and hills, warm air starts to rise upslope during the day (valley wind), while at night the cool air moves downslope (mountain wind) (Gliessman, 2015). At the farm level, wind can be stimulated through corridors or blocked through the presence of vegetation or shelterbelts. While large-scale pressure fields cause wind speed and direction, the topography of a landscape and obstacles influence the winds, leading to small-scale climate differences. Wind velocity in and above a forest is greatly reduced due to friction.Wind can have a cooling effect by removing the boundary layer of warm air around a plant. This can also increase water consumption by the plant, as removing the layer and replacing it with drier air will causes increased transpiration. Wind can cause temperatures to be warmer or cooler depending on the ambient temperature (Bonan 2016;Gliessman, 2015). In addition, air movement in the canopy of vegetation is essential to maintain good CO 2 levels for growth, remove excess humidity and lower the overall humidity level, thereby reducing the potential for diseases. Furthermore, many cereal crops are wind pollinated.Landscapes tend to have heterogeneous surfaces with much difference in surface characteristics (Foken 2008). In combination with wind, this can result in a complicated flow system, that is dependent on the surface's roughness, and humidity and temperature profile. These profiles can shift increases the chances of dew formation (Agam & Berliner, 2006). The presence of wind to transport air humidity can play a significant role in both increasing and decreasing local humidity. A dramatic example is the monsoon, where warm air laden with moisture moves inland.At a large scale, pressure differences cause air movement. At smaller scales, topography, temperature differences and barriers can induce different wind directions and speeds. At a local scale, landscape morphology such as the presence of water bodies and mountains plays an important role. Microclimatic phenomena include small-scale circulation systems, such as mountain and valley winds, land-sea wind circulations, and katabatic winds (Foken, 2008). For example, during warmer months, land mass heats up faster than the water surface, causing winds to blow towards the land. AtIn 2010, the Ethiopian government launched a land restoration programme with the aim to double agricultural productivity by improving the management of natural resources and agricultural lands (IWMI, 2015). Extensive water harvesting and re-greening efforts were undertaken. Both physical and biological soil and water conservation measures were introduced in more than 3.000 watersheds, with soil bunds and stone bunds being constructed on almost all upper, mid and bottom slopes.In the Raya Azebo valley in northern Ethiopia's Tigray region, farmers reported that the treatment led to an increase in humidity and a decrease in local temperatures. Areas close to stone bunds show high soil fertility, partially due to a decreased loss of soil organic matter, and partially due to increased soil moisture availability. Similarly, the placement of bunds led to noticeably higher soil moisture, higher water retention, and cooler soil temperatures. The increased soil moisture retention has caused soil moisture to be available for longer after the rainy season. In addition, frost intensity and potential crop damage has decreased as the increased soil moisture protects the soil.In Tigray, local forms of reforestation and area exclosures have led to an increased intensity of springs and soil moisture in areas surrounding the cropland. This is likely due to improved infiltration of rainfall and a better water storage capacity of the soil. Together with water harvesting measures, it is an example of how microclimate processes can come together to transform a landscape. Wind can act as a transporter of nutrients like soil particles from other places, and seeds, but also diseases and pests. As with pollination, bacteria and fungi depend on wind to spread to a new host, while insects also make use of wind to expand their range (Gliessman 2015). There are also direct mechanical effects from wind such as possible damage to leaves and crops. Sediments suspended in the wind hit leaves and stems from plants, causing structural damage. Another effect is wind erosion, and the loss of top soil that reduces soil fertility. This can have a cascading effect on the microclimate through a loss of vegetation potential and soil moisture storage capacity (Ong et al. 2015).Microclimates may either buffer against climate change or amplify its effects, be it temperature peaks, droughts, or more irregular or delayed rainfall. It is thus important to know how the dynamics between microclimate components and across scales can be influenced and managed (Chen et al. 1999). The microclimate and its interactions is a wide-ranging topic. Issues related to ecosystems, biodiversity, soils, food, water, energy and livelihoods need to be addressed holistically. This gives rise to the need for strategies that guide investments in landscapes to ensure that achieving one goal does not undermine the ability to achieve The drylands of the Atacama Desert represent an example of a fogscape (Salbitano, 2010), being an ecosystem that relies on the interplays between fog, vegetation and soils. Fog represents a vital resource for biodiversity and bring considerable microclimatic benefits to arid drylands, in terms of the presence of soil moisture and vegetation. Local tree species have the capacity to take advantage from the advection fog fluxes from the sea, by intercepting and condensating fog on their leaves. Fog moisture then becomes available moisture for the surrounding arid landscape.In recent decades, fogscapes have been subject to general degradation caused by an increase in deforestation. In the late 1990s, a research project was launched with the aim to rehabilitate the area of Llomas de Meija in Peru with artificial fog collectors. These collectors consist of a metal frame, and are covered with a synthetic mesh, replicating the effect of leaf surfaces.The project results showed that standard reforestation interventions had unsatisfactory results without the supplemental irrigation provided by the fog collectors. At the same time, in places where the collectors were present, trees were able to sustain themselves and supported smaller vegetation and local ecosystems, after two years of artificial fog collection (Semenzato, 1998).Fogscapes can be found along a number of coastlines in Chile, Peru, United States, Morocco, South Africa, Dominican Republic and Spain (Canary Islands). In various semi-arid inland locations, such as in Ethiopia, Guatemala, Yemen and Tanzania, they can also be found. Their impact on local climate dynamics is significant. Water harvesting for groundwater recharge to make water available over a longer period, compared to soil moisture storage. Higher groundwater levels in the upper watershed could support the development of springs at the bottom of the hill. Recharged groundwater can also return to the soil during times of drought through capillary action, aiding plants and improving the microclimate in a similar way as soil moisture storage. Good understanding of groundwater dynamics is critical to design and implement soil and water conservation measures that harvest water and reduce runoff.The effects of water harvesting on the microclimate cannot be seen in isolation, as a changed microclimate can aid further soil moisture recharge, through improved infiltration, percolation, added shade from agroforestry made possible by increased moisture, and increased biological activity that improves both available nutrients and the soil profile. Water harvesting hence is often not done in isolation, but rather combines different approaches, such as agroforestry and re-greening.\"Definitely, there is a difference these years. It is as different as someone who has eaten compared to someone who has not eaten. The production has increased and the soil now can hold moisture for around a week in the hot sun.\"\"We are making an association with the farmers from the watershed, to manage the re-greening measures and share the benefits of the watershed together.\"Cluster 2: re-greeningThrough appropriate design and management, farmers can create or maintain microclimatic conditions that favour the sustainability of a cropping system. Manipulation of radiation and wind is an important factor of microclimate management (Stigter 2011), and can be done floodwater diversion, and erosion and drainage control measures. Increased moisture availability will influence dew formation and a reduced risk of night frost. Moreover, soil moisture availability will give a boost to the ability of soil bacteria to fixate nitrogen and add to the overall fertility of the landscape. A related phenomenon is capillary rise that takes place over time. Particularly in semi-arid areas, water that is stored as shallow groundwater rises back to the root zone later in the season when night temperatures drop, allowing for a second crop or boosting the standing crop.\"The rainfall pattern has considerably decreased, but due to the conservation measures on our farm, soil moisture has increased in my land as well as production\"Farmer in the Raya valley, Tigray 2016Water harvesting is basically the collection of water runoff for its productive use (Critchley 1991). The purpose and type of water harvesting can differ, and this has different effects on the microclimate.The three types that can be distinguished are water harvesting for soil moisture, for open storage and for groundwater recharge. While they all aim to increase the overall water availability for the landscape, the different types of water harvesting can have different effects on the microclimate.Water harvesting that focuses on soil moisture storage increases the available water in the soil profile. In arid areas, this mitigates warm temperatures during the day and cool temperatures during the night, both in the soil and in the air, directly above the surface. It protects against temperature extremes, such as night frost.There is increased moisture for evapotranspiration to increase the local humidity, which in turn lowers the air temperature. The same is accomplished with water harvesting techniques that use open storage.When not used directly for irrigation, surface water lowers the local air temperature and increases air humidity. When used for irrigation, it will have similar effects as soil moisture storage. The use of forest for timber, firewood, fodder and land reclamationAgro-ecosystems that are resilient in the face of climate change are also those that do the least harm to the ecological foundations of agriculture (Gliessman 2015). Farms are at the cross section of many microclimate processes that need to be integrated. Agroforestry is one of the more researched areas of microclimate management. It deals with farm and livestock management through the addition or retention of trees and other woody perennials to benefit from ecological and economic interactions (Nair 1985). Agroforestry is commonly classified in three types: agro-silvo-cultural, silvopastoral and agro-silvo-pastoral, according to the combination of crops, trees and pasture. These can be subdivided in several types and systems. Table 6 shows a number of agroforestry examples.\"There is a temperature difference. Due to the trees that grow in the revegetated area, it is much cooler. It also makes us happy be around the greener area.\"Farmer in the Raya valley, Tigray 2016 Within a cropping system, the conditions of temperature, moisture, light, wind and atmospheric quality vary with specific location (Gliessman by increasing the number of trees in a landscape. Microclimate variables like solar radiation, air temperature at the surface and soil temperature are highly sensitive to changes in the type of vegetation. Like soil moisture, vegetation affects how much heat is absorbed in an area and how much is radiated. It affects the circulation of air temperature at different layers, the speed and direction of winds and the movement of dust particles among others. The presence of small forests in an open landscape can create local winds. Re-greening affects soil structure, nutrient cycling and soil moisture relations (Gliessman 2015). Branches and leaves provide habitats for an array of animal life and shed leaves that provide soil cover and modify the soil environment, being an important source of organic matter as they decay. By altering the structure of the canopy, a new environment is created with a different set of climatic responses (Chen et al. 1999).\"The sun duration and mountain shades have an effect on the evaporation of soil moisture. Soil moisture is lost faster in the fields who get early sunlight.\"Farmer in the Raya valley, Tigray 2016Box 5: Agroforestry and resource competition A discussion related to the introduction of trees and forests in agriculture is the possibility of resource competition. The use of soil nutrients and water competes with those used for cropping, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. The positive effects of a windbreak, increased shade and runoff capture could be negated by the increased water use, reducing rather than improving yields. However, more trees could also tap into different water reservoirs, as they use deeper groundwater than seasonal crops. Hydraulic lifting further makes soil moisture available to crops that would otherwise not be available (Lott et al. 2009;Ong et al. 2015). There is no consensus on whether agroforestry has a beneficial or negative effect on local natural resources, and strategies differ in different regions. A famous example of beneficial agroforestry is the Faidherbia albida tree that sheds its leaves in the rainy season, reducing competition for water and sunlight when crops need it most. Advantages of agroforestry are increased soil moisture retention, reduced water loss from soil evaporation and crop transpiration, and increased soil fertility. The addition of litter fall, root biomass and nutrient capture increases the overall health of the soil that crops can make use of (Lasco et al. 2014). Agroforestry can also be a buffer against climate variability and extremes. Through providing shaded areas and shelter, the overall climate variability is reduced, such as in coffee plantations (Lin 2007(Lin ). 2015)). Conditions above the canopy, in the interior, at the soil surface and below the soil into the root zone can vary greatly, and such a vertical transect within the cropping system is called the microclimatic profile. Conditions in the various zones should not cause problems for the crops. This could happen when warm wind run through the system while the soil is very cold, causing plant desiccation as the roots are unable to absorb water fast enough to offset the loss.Agroforestry has different implications for the microclimate, depending on the type and characteristics of the agroforestry system.• Local rainfall, even a little, can trigger more rainfall. This is known as the threshold effect. Once it starts to rain, it continues to rain; • There is balance and tension between local and regional rainfall. If rain is generated locally, it can come down elsewhere; • Evaporation has two sometimes opposite effects, being a lower temperature and more air humidity. The lower air temperature can create the so-called monsoon edge effect. With cooling, the temperature gradient gets less, and less moisture sucked into the air; • The albedo effect of vegetation causes thermic rise, of which rainfall can be a result when the air is moist:-Grassland has a high albedo so little energy is left for thermic rise; -Forest has a lower albedo so more energy remains in the canopy for thermic rise. Moisture in the air will rise higher and this creates more rainfall.An ongoing area of research is the effect of forests on rainfall. This can be divided in a smaller scale focused 'demand' school and a regional scale focused 'supply' school way of thinking. The demand school proposes that forests compete for water availability. In their view, trees increase interception and evapotranspiration and reduce downstream runoff. The supply school on the other hand, states that the impact of forests must be seen at a larger scale, where local evapotranspiration contributes to the biotic pump and increases water cycle intensity. This school argues that precipitation recycling both raises the likelihood of local rainfall events, as well as the transportation of moist air inland (Ellison et al. 2012).As the question of scale suggests, the impact of forests on water availability not only relates to the water that forests use, but also to where the water ends up. Recent studies state that forests have an important role in inducing rainfall. Increased relative humidity and lower temperatures contribute to a higher likelihood of precipitation events. The release of aerosols by trees also helps cloud formation. Other than precipitation, fog and dew capture is enhanced by forests as they provide surfaces and cooling, which further aids local water availability (Bruijnzeel 2001;2004;Ellison et al. 2012). by covering the surface of the soil. Growing a cover crop is one well-recognised method to do so, and brings additional positive effects related to organic matter content of the soil, seed germination and moisture conservation (Gliessman 2015). Trees and other tall plants that create a canopy (overstory) that covers other plants greatly modify temperature conditions under the canopy. Shade from the canopy reduces solar gain at the surface of the soil, and helps the soil to retain moisture. Removal of overstory vegetation destroys the ability of canopies to buffer the understory and moderate levels of incoming and outgoing radiation (Chen et al. 1999).Trees that are used as windbreak protect a field from prevailing wind patterns, greatly lowering the wind speed before reaching crops. The temperature behind the shelterbelt is usually slightly higher, as the cooling effect from wind no longer applies. Humidity is higher as well, as it is no longer transported away. Reduced exposure to wind and increased humidity reduces evapotranspiration rates from both soil and crops and can increase water use efficiency. A further positive effect is reduced kinetic impacts from wind, such as crop leaf damage and loss of top soil due to erosion.A major consideration, as with other agroforestry measures, is the increased water use from trees used in windbreaks. Areas where water is scarce may see reduced yields, especially when a new agro-forestry scheme is started and newly planted trees compete for water with crops. However, at later stages, tree roots may provide additional access to water during times of drought as they pull water up from deeper in the soil, otherwiseThe presence of trees provides a shading effect to both soil and crops, depending on the composition of the land. This can be a full canopy above the crops, like with coffee production, or a partial canopy to not influence incoming radiation too much, while benefiting from shelter effects. Shade has a direct effect on soil temperature, and moisture loss from evaporation and transpiration. By reducing incoming radiation, soil moisture is lost at a lower rate. Furthermore, reduced air temperature can benefit crops that are sensitive to heat, such as coffee and cocoa (Lasco et al. 2014;Lin 2007). Possible negative consequences from shading are that reduced solar radiation might inhibit plant growth, rather than promote it (Ong et al. 2015). However, Lott et al. (2009) raise the point that in arid and semi-arid environments, the improved microclimate and enhanced soil fertility outweighs any negative effects.Changes in the soil temperature can be induced cooling than the underlying soil would assist in dew formation this turns out not to be the case (Li 2002). The explanation for this was sought in the relationships between soil properties and water adsorption. Similarly, positive properties of soil mulch for dew formation at night were offset by higher evaporative losses during the day (Li 2002;Graf et al. 2008). The deposit of dew droplets on leaves can also serve as an impeding factor, facilitating the growth of bacteria and fungi (Agam & Berliner 2006).Microclimate dynamics are directly related to all landscape components, including vegetation, corridors -streams, roads and powerlines -and transition zones between patches, such as edges between forests and openings (Chen et al. 1999). Microclimatic variance is especially dramatic in transitional zones (also called ecotones) between adjacent ecosystems. Due to increased land use fragmentation, such edge environments where climatic and biotic changes can be seen have become a major portion of landscapes. Changes in physical and biotic environments affect ecological processes as varied as plant regeneration, dispersal of seeds, nutrient cycling and wildlife interactions.Microclimate change, such as temperature increases, caused by intensive land use change may have greater impacts at both local and regional scales than modifications predicted from the greenhouse effect (Chen et al. 1999). It is important to recognise that different features in the landscape -within patches, between patches, through ecotones, across the landscape -have distinct microclimates. Microclimatic patterns across the landscape are highly specific to an ecosystem, due to differences in topography and land use structure. Microclimatic insights can provide unreachable to crops. In an extensive review of windbreak effects on crops, Kort (1988) summarised the positive benefits of windbreaks on crops (see table 7). Gliessman (2015) describes a study that shows yield increases from 5 to 50 percent. The maximum benefits are between 3 and 6 tree heights from the crop, with benefits reported up to 10 tree heights away from the windbreak. An example of the distance effects to the windbreak is given in figure 16. Reduced yields close to the windbreak are probably the result of excessive shading or resource competition.Canopy interception of precipitation reduces surface compaction and improves infiltration by the soil. Similarly, roots and biological activity surrounding the trees, and reduced evaporation in shaded areas improves soil texture and infiltration, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. Cover crops that are planted in between active crop plants are called living mulch. Mulching creates a buffer between the soil and solar radiation, providing a means of reducing soil evaporation through reduced temperatures as well as reduced exposure to wind. Such living mulch can change the albedo of the soil surface and raise the temperature of the air immediately above the crop (Gliessman 2015). For dry mulch, straw from wheat, oats and barley are commonly used, while water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and duckweed (Lemna spp.) are also useful. The combined effect is a greater amount of soil moisture. Plant-derived mulch will eventually become part of the soil, adding to its organic matter content. Another possibility is to let a mulch accumulate naturally, by using a no-tillage system. Crop residues are left on the surface, forming a layer that modifies soil temperature and prevents moisture loss.The effect of soil type and the presence of mulch on dew formation has several complexities. While it was assumed that mulching with faster \"The acacia trees that were regenerated due to the intervention are effective to conserve moisture and act as a wind break and as a living fence. They work as soil erosion prevention.\"Farmer in the Raya valley, Tigray 2016Landscape restoration, microclimate management and sustainable development are topics that require a sound understanding of natural processes and supportive ecosystems. This relates to the study of meta-systematics, which focuses on how systems in perpetual motion relate with, and affect, one another (Gliessman 2015). This can only be done competently by combining insights from many fields of human knowledge and experience. The impact of microclimate management measures will be similar in diverse locations at the small-scale (Chen et al. 1999). However, how this works out at different scales needs to be carefully considered. There is a need to examine microclimatic characteristics at multiple scales and consider cumulative effects, rather than to simply assess the importance of microclimate independently at each scale.vital information when trying to explain other ecological processes and developing management option for a landscape. Microclimate influences the distribution of fauna as varied as butterflies, amphibians, reptiles and birds (Chen et al. 1999).Hence, manipulating the microclimate by altering the structural environment can thus be a useful tool in both wildlife and ecosystem conservation.\"Due to the intervention, the day temperature and night temperature is warmer and fluctuates less. For us, this is an indication that we will have good summer rainfall.\"Farmer in the Raya valley, Tigray 2016The promotion and protection of existing forested lands has benefits to the local microclimate in the surrounding areas as well. The effects of area closure are like agroforestry, with the added benefit of reduced competition for native flora and fauna. Soils benefits from reduced erosion as it is protected by trees and root systems, and its water holding capacity is increased by an improved soil structure from biological activity (Balana et al. 2012). Adjacent lands also benefit. Reduced surface runoff can reduce local erosion of top soils and valuable nutrients, especially in arid and semi-arid areas. Furthermore, increased water infiltration, percolation and transport can make"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4623046600.json b/main/part_2/4623046600.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c53f178b66db229c4e6ef8d53e5f40c414480c7e --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4623046600.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3f7583c9c00ff094e2978a6948b76ee9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5e185f8a-eeff-469f-a0ee-c2cd6949848e/content","id":"1589555379"},"keywords":["Sustainability","gender","rural transformation","farming systems","agri-food system","land use changes","Uganda"],"sieverID":"16fe67ab-2466-4942-a296-a0f6dceaf9a6","content":"To increase understanding of agricultural intensification processes over time and their sustainability, we studied dimensions of sustainability in the context of ongoing expansion of intensive, commercial mono-cropping of banana in Southwestern Uganda. In our approach we considered five dimensions of sustainability: economic, agricultural productivity, environment, social and human. We compared farming systems in 1998 and 2018 and integrated a gender lens. A total of four focus group discussions, two group interviews and fifteen individual interviews (8m / 7f) were conducted, complemented with a discourse analysis of newspaper articles. Results show that although intensification of banana production increased the average income level indicating improvement in the economic dimension, it did not yield sustainable outcomes in the other dimensions. The integrated analysis of five dimensions of sustainability illuminated aspects often neglected in assessment studies or policy-making around agricultural intensification, in particular socioeconomic and gender dynamics. We further recognized that the observed local trends are part of a set of patterns that take place throughout the world. We conclude that to advance sustainable development, stakeholders should move away from the current over-emphasis on economic values prioritizing the individual, and that avoiding patterns of unsustainable development requires broadening to environmental and community values.A quarter of the world's population was moderately to severely food insecure in 2019 and over 700 million people faced severe poverty, most of these living in rural areas (FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, 2020;Worldbank, 2018). Since populations are still increasing, a doubling of Sub-Saharan Africa's population is expected by 2050 (United Nations, 2019), it is evident that food production must increase as well (Conway, 2012;Godfray et al., 2010). To reduce food insecurity and rural poverty, increasing food production alone is not enough; commercialization of food products also needs to sufficiently support the livelihoods of rural populations and should not deplete and destroy natural resources along the way (Loos et al., 2014;Pretty et al., 2011). Since expanding agricultural production into 'new' formerly uncultivated areas is often not possible due to land scarcity or is undesirable, the political and scientific debate tends to focus on intensification of land already under agricultural use (Garnett et al., 2013;Godfray, 2015;Tilman et al., 2011;Tittonell et al., 2016;Van Lauwe et al., 2014). Whilst agricultural intensification has proven to be quite successful at closing yield gaps and increasing agricultural production in some areas of the world, it has been less effective in sustaining natural resources; two-thirds of the land in Africa is estimated to be degraded (ELD initiative and UNEP, 2015). Over the last decades, calls to render agricultural intensification processes (more) sustainable have gained prominence. Initially, the focus was primarily on reducing negative environmental impacts (Pretty et al., 2011). But with time, this expanded to encompass also social and human health dimensions (Loos et al., 2014;Musumba et al., 2017). Weltin et al. (2018) called for more integrated and interdisciplinary research on agricultural intensification processes for instance, which would take a holistic approach that couples farm and landscape scales and includes a socio-economic perspective. They specifically mentioned the importance of in-depth case studies which adopt a system perspective (Weltin et al., 2018). Tittonell et al. (2009) emphasized the importance of understanding the causes which render agricultural systems unsustainable through in-depth analysis. Kebede et al. (2019) and Aravindakshan et al. (2020) argued that building sustainable agricultural systems requires an understanding of the historical dynamics and drivers shaping changing local farming systems and landscapes. Although these and other sources mention people as either causal agents behind-and/or beneficiaries of-agro-ecological (development/innovation) processes associated with agricultural production, the human agency either as individual or as collective is largely neglected in studies on agricultural intensification (Fischer et al., 2020). This is problematic because the (diverse) perspectives of local women and men are essential to understanding what these processes entail in a particular context. With the objective of better understanding intensification processes over time, we developed and implemented a methodology to address the different dimensions of sustainability in the context of smallholder farming. We took a retrospective, gender-sensitive, participatory and qualitative approach for our in-depth case study in a subcounty of Isingiro district in Western Uganda. The rural space and farming systems in this area, transformed over the past two decades under the influence of the growing expansion of intensive, commercial mono-cropping of cooking banana. We specifically sought to identify patterns of socio-ecological development over different scales ranging from field and farm level to landscape from the perspective of adult women and men living in this area.The study design responds to the call for more integrated approaches to study agricultural intensification processes that move away from focusing only on increasing agricultural production per unit of land and /or per unit of input whilst minimizing environmental impacts. Loos et al. (2014) argue for instance, that such a narrow approach does not demonstrate how human well-being is affected and that assessments should include a reference to social justice. The notion that sustainable development entails different dimensions, notably an economic, ecological and social dimension (the pillars of sustainability), is not new (Purvis et al., 2019) and has been intensively discussed in relation to agricultural development and environmental conservation (Bawden, 2012;Dillon et al., 2016;Godfray, 2015;National Research Council, 2014;Pretty, 2008;Rao & Rogers, 2006;Smith & McDonald, 1998) as well as in respect to other sectors such as industrial design (Mcdonough & Braungart, 2002). In our approach to study agricultural intensification processes, we consider five sustainability dimensions; next to agricultural productivity and economic performance, we discern the environmental, the social and the 'human' dimension (Musumba et al., 2017). The human dimension includes aspects of human rights and 'food security', 'human health' and 'nutrition'. We add a retrospective approach by requesting study participants to reflect on the past (20 years prior). Since we acknowledge that farming systems and people's roles and responsibilities in agriculture and rural communities change over time and are strongly gendered (Farnworth et al., 2016) we integrated a gender perspective. Our approach does justice to the implication that women's and men's experiences with intensification and their perspectives on the distinct dimensions of sustainability are likely to be different. It also adds depth to our investigations on the social dimension of agricultural intensification, which tends to be under-researched (Godfray, 2015;Smith et al., 2017;Struik & Kuyper, 2017).The case study was conducted in 2018 in Rugaaga subcounty, Isingiro district, western region of Uganda. Isingiro district, formerly part of the Mbarara district, is a relatively new district which was created in 2006. Isingiro lies in the sub-region Ankole in the Western region of Uganda, bordering Tanzania in the south and surrounded by the districts of Rakai, Ntungamo, Mbarara and Kiruhura. With annual rainfall below 1000 mm, agriculture is limited by water shortages in Isingiro. Large areas are mostly unsuitable for crop production and used as extensive grazing lands for mainly Longhorn (Ankole) cattle while exogenous dairy and meat breeds or cross breeds are becoming more common as well. Lake Nakivale and the likewise named UN refugee settlement are both stretching into the North-Western territory of Rugaaga subcounty. The North-East of Rugaaga is bordering Lake Mburo National Parc in the district of Rakai. The Tanzanian border is located at 20-40 kms distance only.For approximately 70% of the rural population of Isingiro, cooking banana cultivation is the primary if not only income-generating activity (Acord Uganda, 2010). Isingiro is recorded as the district with the highest production of cooking banana in Uganda (UBOS, 2010). More recent production data only available on sub-regional level, states 2.5 Mt cooking banana production in 2018 and a productivity of 16 t/ha for Ankole sub-region (UBOS, 2020). For this study, three villages were selected in the subcounty of Rugaaga, a subcounty described in Kikulwe et al. (2018) as having the highest cooking banana production in the country. We will henceforth refer to these three villages as our study area.In line with the study design, we use various social science methods, especially those rooting in sociology, anthropology, and gender studies. While addressing each of the mentioned dimensions of sustainability, these methods enable to illuminate people's observations and perceptions within the local context and the complexity of interrelations, which are difficult to capture with quantitative methods.The study combines several sources for data collection (Figure 1) and builds on results and lessons from a case study conducted in 2015 (Rietveld, 2017;Rietveld & Farnworth, 2018) using the CGIAR-GENNOVATE methodology (Petesch et al., 2018) (Method 0, Figure 1). The first method (1) informed following rounds of data production and consists of a mapping exercise to pinpoint change and to identify changes at both landscape and farm scales between 1998 and 2018. Perceptions were captured at the collective level by conducting Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and at the individual level through semi-structured interviews. For a more indepth understanding of the context in which these changes occurred we conducted a discourse analysis of local newspaper articles published between 1998 and 2018 describing events and trends in and for the wider geographical area where our study site was located. We also reviewed literature about the area going back to the beginning of the twenty-first century.Method 1participatory mapping of changes and 4-square analysis of crops cultivated in 1998 and 2018The objective of this exercise was to map changes in the landscape, land use and physical structures of the study area and its communities for 1998 and for 2018, to be used as an input for follow-up FGDs. We also included a participatory exercise to determine the extent and distribution of the crops cultivated in the farming systems of the community for 1998 and for 2018 which is also referred to as Extent and Distribution Analysis or a 4-square analysis (Grum et al., 2008). FGD participants first listed all the crops grown in the research area and positioned each crop in one of the four squares, based on their own subjective estimate (as defined by participants together) of the area under cultivation per farm (large/small) and the number of households growing the crop (few/many). Method 1 was conducted with two women and two men between 45 and 60 years old who had grown up in the village or moved there at a young age (>10 years). Because we required respondents to reflect on their own experiences and memories as adults back in 1998, we excluded younger people from participation. The participants were selected on basis of being respected and considered as knowledgeable people in their community.The objective of the FGDs (method 2) was to collect and understand men and women's motivations to act for and in response to change within their (changing) farming systems and to identify important aspects in their assessments of the changes and their own acts and responses in relation to the dimensions of sustainability. We used the maps and 4square cropping system analysis from method 1 as input and means to evoke discussion. Per FGD we selected between 7 and 12 participants who lived in the community from at least 1998 onwards. Like for method 1, we set age limits on 45-60 years old. We conducted the FGDs in single-sex fashion with two groups of men and two groups of women. We further distinguished between 'wealthier' and 'poorer' sections of the population. It proved difficult to interest 'wealthier' men to participate. Some of the men initially mobilized, sent their elderly fathers on our first effort to conduct the FGD with 'wealthier men'. We responded with opportunistically interviewing these four elderly men as a group (method 3) and discussed with them changes since 1978 (rather than 1998).The objective of this exercise was similar to the objective of method 2 but emphasis was on individual experience and perspectives on changes of women and men farmers and focused on the changes in relation to the own life history of the interviewees. The earlier generated maps and 4square analyses were not used in this exercise. Where appropriate, we did probe about key findings from the earlier collected data to triangulate and deepen our understanding. We conducted 15 interviews in total, with 8 men and 7 women; ages ranged between 37 and 71 years old at the time of the interview.About 97 newspaper articles published between 1998 and 2018 were selected for analysis. These newspaper articles were compiled from the online archive of 'All Africa' (https://allafrica.com) in May 2019. In the online archive a search within the 'Uganda' country archive was conducted for papers with a geographical reference to Isingiro and to Mbarara. Isingiro is the current district in which our study site is located. Before 2005, Isingiro was part of Mbarara district. The derived list was screened on relevance and selected papers were categorized in the following categories: (1) agriculture-related: land; farming; banana production; cattle (2) climate and natural resources-related: water; adverse weather; (3) population and migration-related: refugees; (4) food-related: famine.Comparison of the maps generated for 2018 and 1998 and the explanations of the participants indicated the following main changes: (1) large decrease in natural tree cover with no communal and/or natural forest remaining in 2018; (2) decrease in grazing land; (3) large increase in land under cooking banana cultivation; (4) large increase in human settlements and population; (5) privatization of former communal lands; (6) large decrease in cultivation of crops other than cooking banana; (7) expanded and improved road network; (8) small increase in privately owned, planted trees; (9) hillsides were increasingly bare and eroded; (10) increased access to drinking water through household water retention and creation of bore-holes; (11) increased access to electricity through grid and micro solar systems.The Participatory Extent and Distribution Analyses (Figure 2(a,b)) illustrate the nature of the cropping system for 1998 and for 2018. Crops which were commonly grown in the community were listed by participants and divided over one of the four squares on basis of (1) the number of households growing the crop (few/many) and (2) the area under cultivation per farm (large/small). The exercise initially evoked discussion on land sizes rather than on crops. Participants in all FGDs argued that compared to 1998, with the exceptions of a few very wealthy farmers, no crops were cultivated in 2018 on large size lands because 'large land' does not exist anymore. This is reflected in Figure 2(b); although cooking banana production increased significantly it was not placed in square 1 (cultivated by many farm households on large land area) for 2018. All groups did agree unanimously that the trend consisted of increasing cooking banana production and decreasing production of other cropsde facto most households specialized in commercial cooking banana production. Moreover, they stopped intercropping cooking banana with other crops and rather cultivated cooking banana as monoculture.Although cooking banana was also a common crop in 1998 with mostly around 0.5 acres per household, the FGD participants explained it was meant for household consumption only or to pay refugee farm workers in kind for their work. Banana plantations in 1998 usually supported a mix of cooking (1/3) and beer types (2/3) and were commonly intercropped with annuals such a bean. Commercial cooking banana production increased from the year 2000 onwards. This was supported by intensive extension campaigns to improve banana management starting in 2004. This raised not only the productivity but also raised bunch size which made the produced banana more attractive for traders. In the course of a few years (2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) households replaced beerbanana types for cooking types and expanded cultivation at the cost of annual crop production (finger millet, roots and tubers) and grassland.Participants stated that both the two most important crops in 1998 (square 1; cultivated by many farmers on large land area), beer-banana (Musa spp.) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana), were hardly grown anymore in 2018. Beer-banana used to be the main source of income as the raw banana was processed into beer and sold to the refugee population of Nakivale camp and to others. The cultivation of sorghum was directly linked to that of beer-banana as it serves as an ingredient of the beer. The decline of beer-banana cultivation therefore also led to the decline of sorghum cultivation.Finger millet used to be a major food crop and played an essential role for maintaining food security throughout the year as the grains would be stored in granaries. Participants argued that finger millet largely disappeared in favour of cooking banana which is more profitable. In one of the women's FGDs, the participants argued that maize was nowadays favoured over finger millet as food crop since maize can be processed into flour (posho) by machines whilst finger millet needs to be ground manually. Nevertheless, maize is placed in square 4 (cultivated by few farm households on small land area) (Figure 2(b)).Cassava, sweet potato, potato and pea moved from square 4 (cultivated by few farm households on small land area) to square 2 (cultivated by many farm households on small land area) indicating that cultivation of these crops became more common in 2018 than it was in 1998. Although these crops were placed in square 2 together with cooking banana, bean and groundnut, the relative importance of all the crops was still described as very different. From the FDGs it became clear that more land was allocated to cooking banana alone, than to all other crops together.Vegetables, fruit, yam, maize and pumpkin remained in square 4 (cultivated by few farm households on small land area) but participants did indicate that production volumes had reduced over time in favour of cooking banana production. Fruit trees, for instance, were mostly cut down in favour of cooking banana production. Moreover, the diversity within the 'vegetables' and 'fruit' groups was said to have decreased. (1) was the crop cultivated by many or few farm households in the community? And (2) was the crop cultivated mostly on a small land area or on large land area? The minimum threshold for including crops was three times mentioned in the FGDs; between brackets number of times the crop was mentioned out of five FGDs.The map of 1998 showed the presence of grazing land reserved for tending livestock. We learned that many people used to keep goats, sheep and cattle. Sometimes these grazed on privately owned land, but more often on open access private or communal lands in the surroundings. At night, the livestock would be kept in a kraal. In 2018, only few livestock were kept on the farm and in the study site as a whole, mainly as a result of lack of grazing land. Wealthier farmers owned cattle but kept these animals elsewhere where land was cheaper. Local by-laws prescribed that chicken could not roam freely because they could disturb the mulch in banana plantations, therefore only few people kept chickens and enclosed as required.Data from both male and female FGDs further highlighted the following social and economic changes:1. Market economy, labour markets and agri-food trade have become well-established and common:The participants narrated that in 1998, the communities in the study area were isolated; roads were bad and transport options to urban centres were minimal; households lived scattered around the area at a distance from each other. Marketing opportunities for agricultural produce were irregular and concentrated on selling banana-beer and goats to the refugee population in the nearby Nakivale refugee camp. Traders in agricultural produce would only occasionally visit these areas for instance in search of beans or potatoes. Farm workers mostly belonged to the refugee population and would be paid in kind. Households hardly had access to cash or income-generating activities and farming was mostly oriented towards subsistence.This changed from around 2000-2004 onwards; A government-led project focused on sustainable development, started promoting several livelihood enterprises amongst others on 'improved cooking banana management'. This coincided with a growing demand for cooking banana from urban centres and a rise of cooking banana prices coupled with increased access because of government investment in rural roads. Increasingly, more traders came to the study sites to buy cooking banana which drove the described conversion of the cropping system and integrated farm households into the market economy. They employed large numbers of casual farm workers; both men and women originating from within and from outside of the community. Profits were invested back in banana production but also in non-farm enterprises such as real estate and retail businesses which were both established in the local trading centres and in towns such as the regional city Mbarara. This new class of rich farmers was relatively small as a percentage of the population but influential and often referenced by other farmers as an example and role-model for accumulating wealth through commercial banana production. 3. Gender tasks and norms in relation to crop production, access to land and income generationchanged: The changes in the farming systems but also improved access to facilities and increased embeddedness in the market economy led to marked gender changes. Men were said to work more and harder in 2018 than they did in 1998 and to drink alcohol only in the evening. Men invested heavily in cooking banana plantations since 2004 and usually considered this their prime livelihood. Their typical control over banana-derived income was justified by their role as head of the household and owner of the land. Men were supposed to bear responsibility for paying their children's school fees, household basic needs for staple foods (cooking banana or posho), salt and soap and for medical care but did not always conform.In 1998, women used to spend a large part of each day fetching water and many were involved in livestock rearing (cattle) and processing of milk. With increased access to (drinking) water and reduced importance of cattle, these activities hardly existed anymore in 2018. In 2018, womenearned respect in the community by working hard in their husbands' banana plantation. Women continued to have responsibility to prepare food and provide for 'sauce' but encountered difficulties as their access to land for growing crops like beans and vegetables became increasingly confined. Women perceived men's tendency to prioritize banana production in monocultures as the direct cause of this development:Men do not allow us to intercrop any other crops with the bananas. (FGD poor women) 4. Polygyny became increasingly common over the years as men, earning unprecedented income from cooking banana production, married additional wives. Women complained in the FGDs and interviews that once men get a new wife, they ignore their responsibilities towards their first wives and families. Land allocated for use to the wife was often re-distributed when men married second or third wives. As a consequence, first wives ceased to benefit from the growing income derived from cooking banana sales and overall land available per household member decreased. In the two FGDs with women, participants were very outspoken that polygyny halted development in the household. 5. Banana plantation labourers formed a new social class consisting of both local and migrant women and men with no or small landholdings.Migrants came in and could stay since the demand for labour on banana plantations was large. Some of the migrant labourers took (semi-) permanent residency in the area leading to development and growth of so-called 'trading centres' (village centres), others temporarily lived-in on the wealthy farmers' plantations. Refugees from camp Nakivale were also providing labour in 2018, although participants explained this used to be more prevalent in 1998. Earnings from casual labour varied; 5000 UGX (approx. 1.5 USD in 2018) was mentioned as an average daily wage on a banana plantation but we also heard accounts of much lower wages. Especially migrant labourers living in with their employer were observed to receive less but were often provided with food and lodging. Just like in 1998, refugees were still commonly paid in kind with small bunches of cooking banana.6. Livestock keeping became increasingly unattainable for the less endowed because of the disappearance of communal lands: Because there was not enough grassland anymore in 2018, livestock rearing had disappeared for most people, especially for those with small landholdings. This was conceived as a threat by both men and women because the security option to diversify with livestock had disappeared:We are forced to focus on cooking banana now, which is not good. (FGD wealthier men) This trend also affected diets as animal protein such as milk and meat became less available.7. Increasing land prices and land scarcity: By 2018, land had become increasingly scarce and this was a key concern for most people participating in this study. Several causes of land scarcity were mentioned; immigration most prominently.Many of the study participants had migrated from other places to this locality themselves as a child or young man/woman. Those who lived in the area for several generations acknowledged that the men had sold their abundant land on the plateaus to the newcomers (mainly Banyankole tribe) roughly between 1970 and 2000. A woman told:Many people migrated to this area and our husbands sold most of the land back then and it was the men's responsibility because men love money. We were never involved in the agreements; we would just see our land being demarcated and later find out he had sold it.(FGD poor women)Other immigrants (Bakiga tribe) cleared the forest in the valleys and on slopes and established themselves there as farmers. In 2018, immigrants were mostly labourers looking for (temporary) employment in the banana plantations. They arrived from other parts of Uganda and to a lesser extent from Tanzania. In 2018 land had become expensive and de facto unaffordable for most smallholder farmers and labourers.Natural population growth was also mentioned as a key driver for land scarcity. The FGD participants indicated that most households, and certainly the polygynist, had high birth rates. It meant that the new generation would often inherit tiny, fragmented landholdings. Already most locals who have lived in the study area for several decades considered their landholdings 'small'.There were tensions between the local community and the refugee camp Nakivale concerning land. Men said in the FGDs that the camp was 'taking away' their grazing lands. These tensions were also reported in the newspapers and reached a peak in 2017 when a member of parliament incited local men to violently grab land from the camp.In the environmental domain the following changes were identified:1. Decreasing availability of firewood for food preparation: Participants stated that forests had been cut down over the last century and virtually disappeared in the vicinity of the study area. Some woodlots with eucalypt remained but these were privately owned and often fenced off. Women mentioned firewood scarcity as the main challenge of today:Those days [1998] the main challenge was getting water, these days it is getting firewood. (FGD wealthier women) They told about their struggle to find enough firewood for food preparation and that they either ate fewer cooked meals a day or prepared food with shorter cooking time.2. Soil fertility decline was a major concern for many farmers in 2018, and several indicated that smaller banana bunch sizes were being produced because of 'over-using' the land. With the semi-permanent production mode of cooking banana, crop rotation or fallows were abandoned and since most farmers did not own livestock, they had limited access to manure for soil fertilization. Some wealthy farmers purchased manure from elsewhere but for most farmers this was not feasible because of the high monetary investment required. Chemical fertilizers were not used on cooking banana; the farmers perceived these products as 'bad' for the soil. 3. Wetland destruction and siltation of lakes and rivers: Newspaper articles reported that the Mburo-Nakivale wetland ecosystems was drying up, contributing to the drying up of river Rwiizi as well, an important water source in Mbarara district. The wetlands of Lake Nakivale, which is bordering the subcounty, were facing encroachment from both refugees and local populations as land scarcity increased. Apart from its ecological functions and value, these wetlands fulfil an important role for water retention and year-round water availability downstream. In addition, Lake Nakivale is silting up due to run-off soil erosion in the catchment area which includes our study site. Because of the lower water retention capacity of Lake Nakivale another lake (Oruginga) was formed in 1999 altering the landscape drastically. 4. Increased occurrence of drought and regular crop failure and famine: In the FGDs and individual interviews respondents stated that they experienced 'more sunshine' and less rains during the last decade as compared to twenty years ago.Newspaper articles from 1998 to 2018 mentioned occurrence of droughts and related crises such as food shortages, cattle starvation and famine on four occasions over the course of these two decades: in 1999, 2005-2006, 2009-2010 and in 2016-2017. Drought and associated crop failure were worrying people and not without reason.Although banana plants usually did not die in the reported droughts, they did stop producing banana bunches. When we conducted these studies in May 2018, the district was just recovering from a severe drought which had caused crisis and food shortages, even famine, during 2016-2017. Several respondents made a direct link between deforestation and drought:We cut all trees and now we have little rain. (FGD poor men) And this drought also instilled a fear of the future in people and an awareness that reliance on banana production alone is risky: Most of our leaders are teaching us to use bananas to get money and educate our children. This means we have focused so much on bananas that we have destroyed our own environment and if we are not careful, we will have no more plantations 20 years from now. (FGD wealthier men)If again we are confronted with a major drought, it will be a problem. So, I think we need other sources of income. [..] With prolonged drought however nothing can work. (Individual interview male farmer).1. Decreasing diet quality: Dietary diversity was low and diets were more staple food focused in 2018 than they were in 1998. Many households choose to sell cooking banana and to buy posho for household consumption:We only give them [the women] the small bunches for eating at home and if it is not enough, we buy posho and feed the family. (FGD wealthier men)The on-farm availability of food crops other than cooking banana was minimal and so was storage of food, it became rare to store food whereas in 1998 it was still common practice to store finger millet in granaries. Consumption of animal products (meat, milk, ghee) has also decreased considerably:In 1998 we would intercrop and have a large variety of food crops; now we only intercrop on the borders of the cooking banana plantation; we have almost stopped growing crops like groundnuts, beans, peas, cassava, millet. Few women grow these crops nowadays, everything is banana. (Individual interview male farmer) Diets also suffered from the earlier mentioned firewood scarcity as meals with shorter cooking time were preferred, implying that consumption of nutritious food crops like bean with long cooking time was reduced. Land scarcity was mentioned as a primary reason for having reduced on farm crop diversity:We would want to plant more [different] crops, but we have limited land. (FGD wealthier men) 2. Increased access to safe drinking water: In 1998, there was only one (natural) water point in the study area which served the whole population. In 2018, there were several taps installed by government where people accessed water for a small fee; this water was however not preferred for drinking because of high natrium levels. Many households practiced water retention in 2018; they established basins to collect rainwater. This had tremendous impact on especially women and children as they used to spend a lot of time collecting water (up to 4 hours per day). Personal hygiene also improved as a direct result of increased water availability and men commented that their wives look more beautiful today [2018] than they did in 1998.Since 1998, the number of both public and private schools increased in the area. Most participants indicated that their children, both boys and girls, started primary school. Public primary schools charge no education fee, but caretakers do encumber costs related to uniforms, materials and lunch. Because public schools were overcrowded and of low quality, many caretakers sent their children to private schools. 'School fees' were often the largest expense of households with children which applied to both poorer and wealthier population sections as wealthier households tended sending their children to more expensive (better) private schools. Since schooling was costly and the number of children per household was generally high, attending secondary schooling was not considered evident. The number of school drop-outs was high for both boys and girls and only few children completed secondary school.The participants of the FGDs and interviews univocally shared the perception that the land and its communities in the research area underwent enormous changes on all fronts during the period between 1998 and 2018. To situate these changes in a wider context, we constructed a timeline (Figure 3) drawing on various sources both from literature and our primary data. At the beginning of the twentieth century, our research area was very sparsely populated. High disease pressure (malaria, sleeping sickness), dryness of the climate, 'wildness' (presence of wild animals) and isolation from other settlements were mentioned as causes (Bagenda et al., 2003;Kafureka, 1992;FGDs). This changed over the second half of the twentieth century in which the population increased. In the 1940s-1950s, colonial rule promoted settlement in these sparsely populated areas from densely populated areas elsewhere in Uganda. The early migrants were often able to acquire land free of charge or cheaply and are currently still amongst the largest landowners.In 1958-1960, the UN refugee camp (also called settlement) 'Nakivale' was established on the south border of Rugaaga subcounty. It initially hosted Tutsis fleeing Rwanda from persecution of the newly established Hutu regime (Bagenda et al., 2003). These refugees lived in relative harmony with local populations; they traded and exchanged on a growing labour and food market (primarily for banana-beer and animal products). These first refugees were described as 'those that brought development to this area' (group interview elderly men) and they are juxtaposed with the 'other' refugees (Hutu from Rwanda and refugees from Somalia, DR Congo and Burundi) who arrived from the 1990s onwards. These later refugees 'were no use to us' according to elderly men (group interview) and blamed for causing and aggravating land scarcity: our grazing land is given away for free by the government. (FGD wealthier men) Oral anecdotes (group interview elderly men) and an FAO report (Koeman et al., 1980) indicated the implementation of campaigns to eradicate tsetse fly (vector of sleeping sickness) during president Obote's first term (1966)(1967)(1968)(1969)(1970)(1971) alongside large schemes to clear forest in the valleys. This made the area more suitable for human settlement and stimulated immigration. A new wave of immigration started after the Bush War of 1980-1986 when peace and stability were reinstated after a decade of unrest. This coincided with two key trends which drove the impending investments in cooking banana production:(1) Renewed investment in road networks and infrastructure leading to increased connectivity to market economies, e.g. from the late 1990s onwards urban traders were enabled to visit Rugaaga to buy agri-produce;(2) Increased rates of urbanization and therewith the creation of large urban demand for food and particularly for the preferred staple food of the Baganda: cooking banana (matooke).The increasing prices and demand for cooking banana stimulated the farmers to not only switch from beer-banana cultivars to cooking type cultivars but also to decrease cultivation of other crops in favour of cooking banana and to expand its cultivation into wetlands (Adonia, 2013), woodlots, grazing lands and onto slopes. Furthermore, they intensified their banana-crop management by switching from intercropping to monoculture production and by applying more intensive management practices such as de-suckering, de-leaving and organic manure application. This intensification process was supported by government policies and extension services who actively promoted commercial cooking banana production from 2001 onwards. De facto this implied a shift in economic orientation from production for subsistence towards market-oriented agriculture:Population increase has led to land scarcity but has also helped us to develop. We have many trading centers now, there are people to work on our farms and we have a market for our crops. (FGD poor men).Our discussion focuses on two points: first, we draw and discuss key learnings from our study and relate this to current and historical rural change trajectories around the globe. Second, we reflect on and discuss these learnings in relation to agricultural research for development and possible ways out of unsustainable intensification pathways.We learned that agricultural intensification through increased mono-cropping and use of external inputs (labor; manure) led to greater social stratification and is not attainable to poorer sections of the farming population. While household levels of wealth on average have increased as a result of intensified banana production, inequity among households and within households has also risen. At the community level, differences between the 'haves' and 'have not's' have increased as larger landholders have often managed to not only considerably increase their income but also local authority and power. They managed to secure their position by sustaining high production through large investments in soil fertility. In addition, they have often managed to diversify their livelihoods into non-farming activities which makes them less vulnerable to recurring droughts. Meanwhile, most medium and small landholders deplete their soils because they cannot afford similar investments in soil management. Simultaneously, land has been fenced off, inhibiting households with no or too little land to collect firewood or graze goats. Within households, women also tend to lose out compared to men. Although they usually spend more time on banana management than before, they often have limited control over the revenues and expenditure. In 2018, women did have more freedom compared to 1998 to cultivate annual crops which were formerly in the domain of men but their access to land had declined as more land had been brought under banana cultivation. This limited women's options to earn income from farming and to maintain diverse diets for adequate nutrition. In addition, there was a strong tendency amongst men to invest banana income in raising new and additional families (polygyny), often to the disempowerment and deprivation of first wives and all their children. This trend further reduces women's access to land and promotes land fragmentation which will increasingly put pressure on the current farming system.The rise and growth of capitalist markets in Uganda and the increased connectiveness of our study area with this market goes a long way in explaining the developments described by the participants in the FGDs and interviews. Not only agricultural products such as goats, banana-beer and later cooking banana were transformed into commodities, also land and labour were commodified as their economic value got established and increased. Social classes, gender relations and men and women's contributions and positions in the local society changed alongside these developments. These trends align with Polyani's (1948) description of 'The Great Transformation' and similar narratives about commodification and the transforming power of the liberal, capitalist market economy on social changes. These changes are reinforced by population growth and the associated loss of communal areas and accompanying changes in social structures (Hardin, 1968;Juo & Wilding, 2001;Lambin et al., 2001;Leopold, 1949;Norton, 2005). Intensive 'modern' farming unilaterally focused on productivity and financial profit with its associated negative externalities (Dawson et al., 2016;Pretty, 2008) can be considered as a continuation of this transformation. More recently although also not new in human history, climate change has come up as an accelerator for some of these processes (Aravindakshan et al., 2020;Farnworth et al., 2016;Lambin et al., 2001;Thompson & Scoones, 2009). More concisely we recognize in our case study, and allude to, the following familiar and predictable patterns:1. Unequal distribution of resources and benefits:Commodity-oriented agricultural production leading to more wealth and better level of education, but wealth is unequally distributed thus leading to more inequity and women disempowerment. Participants in our case study showed strong support overall for the current mode of banana production and the expansion and ongoing intensification of production. It has brought economic gain to these communities and the predominant disposition could be paraphrased as follows: 'have you seen that very nice new house mister X build? He is a large banana producer'. Banana production was conceived as the pathway to economic prosperity. Although cracks appeared in this dream after the 2016-2017 drought (see Box 1), the idea seemed persistent and farmers and politicians, especially those who benefitted from banana production most, were reluctant to acknowledge the imminent threats that (some of) the familiar patterns we describe in this paper present to local livelihoods of especially the more vulnerable in the community and to the environment. We wondered though why also poorer households, who did not seem to benefit much from this pathway, still went along with it; was it the promise of wealth and prosperity which enticed them to focus on cooking banana production? In neighboring Rwanda, Dawson et al. (2016) identified similar developments for agricultural intensification and wealth-based inequality; of four identified household types only the people living in the two wealthiest types of households tended to benefit from agricultural intensification whilst the two poorer household types experienced more food insecurity and poverty. The difference between these two neighboring countries however is that farmers in Rwanda are prescribed what and how to grow by an authoritative regime and Ugandan farmers are not; they can make their own choices.That said, most study participants (men, women of diverse wealth status alike) perceived the available options for adjusting and reconfiguring their individual farm system as low. A feeling of being trapped was a common denominator in their perceptions. Dogliotti et al. (2014) describe a similar situation in Southern Uruguay where family farms have intensified agricultural production in response to external trends and have become 'locked-in' on unsustainable intensification trajectories. Dogliotti et al. (2014) blame this on the kind of adjustments farmers made in response to changing conditions; these were mostly incremental in nature, and this created 'the trap' as they went along. Only through a strategic and tailored re-design of the whole farm system, a small number of selected farm households managed to turn around their individual situation. Dogliotti et al. (2014) recognized though, that ways out for especially the more resource-constrained farm households would hinge on regional-level interventions, developments and policies as well.In this paper, we have gravitated towards the social dimension of sustainability in relation to agricultural Box 1. Climate change by increasing drought in study-area.intensification processes and realized that increased understanding of particularly the social dimension has a lot to offer, also in terms of understanding the drivers, underlying causes and impacts of changes linked to the productivity, economic, environmental and human dimensions. Fostering sustainable development requires an integrated, interdisciplinary, and holistic approach to agricultural intensification (Weltin et al., 2018) that makes the socio-cultural values that underly the envisioned development pathway explicit. Because sustainable development is connected to social justice, it is deeply value laden (Thompson, 2007) and tends to have cultural and moral significance. The required research approach therefore deviates from the implicitly assumed (objectivist) epistemological foundation that considers science as objective and value-free (Bawden, 2012;Cundill et al., 2012). Feminist scholars such as Longino (2005), Haraway and Harding (1993) argue that it is impossible to eliminate (all) valuedriven assumptions in science and that inference by contextual values should therefore be part of the scientific endeavour (Longino, 2005, pp. 4-5). According to Longino (2005, p. 8) researchers can be committed to understanding whilst providing multiple perspectives on social and political dimensions of systems and their development as long as bias is recognized and avoided. Feminist epistemology further considers that plural perspectives are rooted in a particular context and acknowledges that these pivot around power (Anderson, 2006;Harding, 1993).Intensification trajectories with the familiar patterns of unsustainable development as observed in our case study are associated with over-emphasis on economic values and commoditization, and the priority for the individual, as reflected in the notion of 'methodological individualism', the notion that the eventual unit of analysis is the individual (Norton, 2005, p. 238). Broadening the set of values to include environmental and communal values has been promoted as an approach to solve the kind of wicked problems (Rittel & Webber, 1973), we present here (Norton & Thompson, 2014). Our analysis provides a background for 'place-orientation'; an understanding of the circumstances in which the described problems are embedded and therewith an opening to address these problems adequately through social learning (Cundill et al., 2012;Norton, 2005;Norton & Thompson, 2014). By emphasizing a focus on marginalized actors and their perspectives next to actors with power, feminist enquiry has the potential to open the floor to diverging interests often overlooked in participatory and stakeholder processes which tend to favour more powerful actors. This focus could be embedded in a future-and communityoriented approach that supports development pathways by designing strategies and tactics based on shared economic, environmental and communal values building on shared principles and goals (Mcdonough & Braungart, 2002).With regards to the question what sustainable development would look like for this community, we argue that this can only be defined by or at least together with community members (Thompson, 2007). For this to work, it is essential that also the perspectives of the non-powerful are known, considered and acted upon (Cohen et al., 2016). It is the landless farm labourers, the wives of men with only small landholdings, the first wives of farmers who invest in second or third families, and the young men and women from large families with limited resources who are likely to benefit least and suffer most from a continued focus on agricultural intensification of commercial cooking banana and specifically its negative externalities. Sustainable alternatives will look different for different individual or groups of people (Thompson & Scoones, 2009) but need to appeal to their (broadened set of) values and provide real opportunities in order to oppose the prosperity through banana intensification promise.We presented women and men farmer's observations on and perceptions of the sustainability of ongoing intensification trends in banana production for a subcounty of Isingiro district over five dimensions; ecological, economic, social, productivity and human. The practice of thinking through all five dimensions in the assessment of sustainability of agricultural intensification processes represents a system perspective illuminating aspects directly driven by agricultural intensification which are often neglected in studies on this topic. We show how increased understanding of particularly the social dimension can support the understanding of drivers and underlying causes of changes linked to the other dimensions of sustainability in the context of smallholder farming. Through our gender lens also the distinct realities of women and men were presented which enriches this analysis of agricultural intensification processes.The farmers participating in our case study narrated that the ongoing intensification of cooking banana production in Rugaaga subcounty has led to significant positive changes in the period between 1998 and 2018 such as increased income and improved access to water. They acknowledged however that this intensification process was not sustainable. At field level for instance, depletion of soil fertility was presented as problematic and current production levels were seen as unlikely to be maintained under similar management conditions. From a farm systems perspective, which includes a focus on the ecological, social and human dimensions of sustainability next to productivity and economic, a multitude of other negative externalities and consequences were observed. Within farming households, over-dependence on cooking banana resulted in vulnerability to droughts and malnutrition and disempowered women as compared to men. At community level, social stratification increased; a new social class built up prosperity while poor household suffered from increasingly restricted access to the resources they need to maintain their livelihoods. We recognized that the observed trends are not unique but can be observed in different shapes and on varying timelines throughout the world. More specifically these trends lead to unequal distribution of resources and benefits; reduction of diversity and ecological processes; intensification-degradation spirals; loss, depletion and pollution of resources; and increased vulnerability for volatility and change.Our analysis contributes to understanding of the socio-ecological system which is essential to embark on a pathway towards sustainable development. At the same time this is only a first step. Next steps to advance sustainable intensification are that stakeholders broaden their set of values to include environmental and communal values away from the current over-emphasis on economic values prioritizing the individual and that they include the perspectives of marginalized community members.No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s)."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4629024931.json b/main/part_2/4629024931.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a5fecb40ece0c9acf98eb7ac2b245ab5212dba72 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4629024931.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7b3f55cf66b5b79a4b1b186e84d91e46","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/20eb1f87-05d2-422a-811f-d873532e2b72/retrieve","id":"-574382952"},"keywords":["African drylands","cereal crops","climate change","IITA","soil and water management","TAAT Program","technology deployment","transferable assets"],"sieverID":"85c971f6-ee85-41ef-bd3f-1bc5fcf0540b","content":"This paper describes the opportunity for combining climate action and improved food and nutritional security as mutual elements of rural development projects, with particular reference to the situation in the African Sahel. This progress is achieved by identifying climate-smart agricultural production technologies and bundling them into solutions for inclusion within larger projects and programs. Seventeen (17) such technologies are offered in this chapter that represent genetic innovations, improved soil and water management, and directed improvement across landscapes. Examples of the efficacy of these technologies are presented based on results from the African Agricultural Transformation Program (TAAT) with specific reference to improved cereal production. An example of the deployment of TAAT technologies for millet and sorghum involving 83,620 households managing 123,863 ha led to nearly 200,000 MT of increased food production worth about $42 million. This effort led to an estimated annual increase of 177,279 MT CO 2 e in biomass and soil worth $3.9 million, assuming buyers could be found. The relationship between three principal drivers of agricultural transformation, the public, private, and farming sectors, is considered in terms of how these different technologies are mobilized and deployed. The potential for increasing food supply and carbon gains under current agricultural investment levels across the Sahel by International Financial Institutions, about $683 million per year, is described. This chapter then offers recommendations in how improved rural development projects combining climate action and food security in the Sahel may be designed in the future.Adaptation to climate change by small-scale farmers is considered an important part for the climate solution agenda [1,2]. This is specially the case in the Sahel where food security is tenuous and becoming more so due to rising temperatures and more episodic precipitation [3,4]. Awareness of this situation is not new, and several farming technologies were identified and modified that allow rural households to cope with increased risks through reliance upon improved crop varieties, more efficient water harvesting, protection of soil quality and participation in well planned, systems-level improvements to their agro-ecosystems [5]. Indeed, isolated cases of successes are documented and used as the basis of designing larger, subregional projects [6] intended for the joint purpose of increasing food and nutrition security in ways that constitute climate action by legions of small-scale farming households [7,8].All rural development projects require inclusive and active participation by the public and private sectors, and the client farmers themselves, because local organizations acting through public works and as customers of proven production inputs represent a complete package toward change. Rural development projects are often financed by sovereign loans from International Financial Institutions (IFIs). It is the design and implementation of these projects that prove difficult. In some cases, countries receiving sovereign country loans rely upon suboptimal, existing technologies and are reluctant to involve what they perceive as overly expensive international partners. In other cases, it is not the technologies that are flawed, but rather the manner that they are bundled as solutions, because effective interventions seldom require only one new technology but rather balanced sets of accompanying production inputs and innovative practices [9]. In yet other cases, it is not the solutions that are inadequate, but rather their manner of deployment, often in expectation of too rapid adoption [10]. Complicating this arena is the growing recognition that small-scale farming households are both victims of climate change yet offer the means to effect corrective actions when offered the opportunity and incentive to do so [1].Dryland farming is the dominant mode of livelihood across the Sudano-Sahelian zone of Africa, a transition zone about 400-600 km wide that stretches from the Atlantic Ocean in Senegal to the Red Sea in Djibouti and Indian Ocean in Somalia [11]. Climate-smart solutions and modernization of technologies are critical to improving agriculture in the zone. The Sahel is home to a population of about 110 million persons, the majority of whom rely upon agriculture through the cultivation of about 30 million ha. Landscapes are flat to gently undulating and rainfall at theses latitudes is concentrated in a single growing season between June and September, with a total annual precipitation of only 150-600 mm that is often deposited by only a few heavy storms. Daytime temperatures often exceed 40°C. The natural vegetation ranges from semi-desert in the north to woody grassland in the south. Millet is widely grown in the Sahel and Sudanese zones, but so too is sorghum and maize. New varieties of wheat can be grown too, particularly during the cooler months [12]. Semi-nomadic pastoralism is widely practiced and overgrazing has led to extensive land degradation and desertification. Rice cultivation is possible in some areas, most notably the valleys of major rivers, and represents an important crop in household diets and livelihoods. The adjoined Sudanese Zone receives greater rainfall (600-1200 mm per year) but is confined to a 2-3 month window and its farmers are faced with similar challenges to crop production as their neighbors in the Sahel [5].Agricultural production in the Sahel is perilous because of severe and cyclical droughts [13]. Other soil limitations exist due to low water-holding and nutrient retention capacities and soils are often sandy and acidic [14]. Because of their unfavorable soil physical properties and low nutrient reserves, soils of the African drylands present a challenge to farmers [15]. Clearly, farmers in the Sahel are acutely aware of drought as a chronic risk and are prepared to adjust their cropping strategies accordingly. Population densities in the agricultural areas remain relatively low, with 0.5-1.5 ha available per capita. Land availability alone does not assure rural prosperity in the Sahel owing to the poor crop productivity resulting from low rainfall and chronic risk of drought. Despite the severe conditions experienced by farmers in the Sahel, large opportunities are available for employing improved soil and water management technologies, including those important to climate actions [5].The Technologies for African Agricultural Transformation Program (TAAT) deploys proven technologies to African farmers, including those in the Sahel. TAAT arose as a joint effort of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and the African Development Bank (AfDB) and is a crucial component of the latter's Feed Africa Strategy [10]. It is organized around 15 \"Compacts\" that represent priorities and partnerships to achieve food security in Africa and advance its role in global agricultural trade [16]. TAAT operates a Regional Technology Delivery Infrastructure that offers a menu of tested and proven food production technologies for nine priority commodities to program partners and stakeholders. These technologies are bundled into \"technology toolkits\" [17] that are included within country projects and deployed through extension campaigns. These technologies include improved crop varieties, seed systems innovations, accompanying soil fertility and pest managements, harvest and postharvest handling, digital applications, and value addition processes [18], providing Regional Public Goods that attract broad public interest and recognizable benefits. TAAT offers a unique collaborative platform where government, international donors, private actors, and nonstate actors committed to advancing transformative agricultural technologies connect with those who need them most, particularly within programs addressing agricultural production and rural development. It offers a mechanism for the development community to buy into proven technical advances [19]. This paper describes how TAAT's technologies are of benefit to the Sahel and how they may be better integrated within climate action efforts.Solutions are available that assist farmers in the Sahel to increase productivity and achieve food security while also being able to tackle environmental challenges posed by drought, land degradation, and climate change. The solutions are based on greater access to proven technologies that remain under-recognized, inadequately delivered or too difficult to access. Once mobilized, however, key technologies may be bundled into toolkits offering solutions to those seeking to modernize and transform dryland agriculture by combining improved crop varieties, more effective water conservation practices and proven approaches for soil fertility management [9,17]. Cereal improvement in the Sahel focuses upon millet, sorghum, maize, and wheat that are both drought-and heat-tolerant [20]. Better water management achieves water storage from contour bunds, water harvesting within zaï pits, diversion of seasonal floods, and small-scale irrigation schemes [21,22]. Practices for integrated soil fertility management involve rotation with legumes, fertilizer micro-dosing, strategic timing of nitrogen application and effective use of organic resources [14]. Larger-scale impacts are achieved through transition from open fields to agroforestry parklands, improved rangeland management and other climate actions specifically targeted to semiarid agro-ecologies. It is essential that these technologies become incorporated into larger rural development projects, but first they must be readily understood by development planners, extension supervisors, and business persons seeking to enhance the lives and livelihoods of farmers. The Sahel is one of the areas of the world that is unfairly penalized by industrial polluters in developed countries, and the impacts of climate change it suffers are not of its own making. Inclusion of these technologies into rural development projects, including those financed with sovereign loans from International Financial Institutions, and embedding them into country-level climate actions serve to correct this disparity.TAAT offers 17 technologies useful to both rural development and climate action (see Table 1). These technologies are grouped according to their relationship to improved field crop varieties (four crops), better management of water resources (four technologies), relationship to integrated soil fertility management (four technologies), and possibilities for system-level improvement (five technologies). Not considered among these technologies is rice (Oryza sativa), an important irrigated crop of Sahelian river basins, and animal enterprises that are extremely important across the Sahel but beyond the scope of this paper.These technologies relate to four cereal crops with unrealized potential in the Sahel: millet, sorghum, maize, and wheat.Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) is the staple cereal in the harshest of the world's major farming areas: the arid and semiarid region extending between Senegal to Somalia. Withstanding hot, dry, sandy soils, it is adapted toward survival under harsh conditions [20]. It is amazingly drought-tolerant and able to germinate at high soil temperatures and in crusted soil, it withstands \"sand blasting\" and grows under low soil fertility, and it resists pests and diseases such as downy mildew, stem borer, and parasitic striga. It also grows well in both acidic and saline soils. But its most rugged land races are characteristically low yielding and may not respond well to inputs, and for this reason there is need for improved varieties and their accompanying seed systems. Breeding efforts have led to increased micronutrients (e.g. iron and zinc), and some improved \"sugary\" types can be harvested at the milk stage, and roasted and consumed like sweet corn. The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) is responsible within TAAT for millet improvement, offering many new varieties for testing by national systems or release to development efforts.Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is a physiological marvel; it is extremely drought tolerant and light efficient, with one of the highest dry matter accumulation rates among cultivated crops [20]. It is versatile in its use with some types boiled like rice, others cracked like oats, others malted for brewing, and some milled and baked. The whole plant may be used as forage or hay. ICRISAT is also responsible for sorghum improvement, including in the Sahel. Currently available improved varieties and land races have several favorable characteristics including good seedling emergence and rapid early root development, rapid tillering leading to multiple heads, and long growing cycles to make the best of favorable rains. It can be manufactured into a wide variety of foods and used to substitute for imported grains. These properties combined with sorghum's use as an animal feed suggest that national planners are well advised to regard sorghum as more than a drought-hardy subsistence food.Considerable gains in maize (Zea mays) improvement have been achieved in the area of drought tolerance that now make this crop less risky in the southern reaches of the Sahel. Drought tolerant maize varieties have a 20-35% larger grain harvest under moderate drought conditions but may not respond as favorably to occasional years of excellent rains due to their shorter maturity times [23]. Hybrid varieties are marketed under commercial license, while open pollinating varieties can be multiplied and sold free of royalty by farmers and community-based producers. The African Agricultural Technology Foundation has sublicensed 22 seed companies to produce Drought TEGO™ for commercial distribution, and more will follow [18]; but these hybrids have been slow to reach West Africa.The trait of heat tolerance is now incorporated into improved varieties of wheat (Triticum spp). Heat stress and drought are among the most predominant constraints affecting wheat across Africa [24], especially at the reproductive stage during flowering and grain filling, leading to low grain yield or even crop failure [25]. Wheat production has increased significantly in the Sahel over the past several years due to the rapid increase of area planted to these newly released heat-tolerant varieties. Varieties that can withstand temperatures up to 4°C greater than previous lines are available. As a result, farmers are achieving higher and more stable yields, reaping up to 6 t ha −1 . The success also has policy implications by convincing country decision-makers that domestic wheat production is a solution to reduce the massive dependence upon wheat imports.These technologies relate to different forms of water management, including the design of small-scale irrigation systems.Bunds refer to a micro-catchment technique where low raised walls are arranged in specific patterns on farmlands to collect and conserve water and to reduce soil erosion and gully formation [26]. Bund walls are constructed with soil and/or rock, either by hand or tractor. Designs of bund walls are adjusted to local conditions and sociocultural contexts, but the two main types are contour bunds (or contour ridges) and semicircular bunds (or half-moons). Contour bunds are suitable for uniformly sloping terrains with even runoff, and the retaining walls can stretch hundreds of meters across landscapes. Semicircular bunds operate in a more localized manner [21]. Installing contour bunds can increase grain yields of sorghum by 80% and maize by 300% compared to traditional land management without micro-catchment. Community works that stabilize slopes and better harness seasonal rainfall by constructing and reinforcing bunds are an important element of agricultural development projects in the Sahel.Micro-catchment approaches to water harvesting in the Sahel include planting pits, locally known as zaï [15]. Zaï pits also rehabilitate crusted and degraded lands. These structures are made by digging shallow basins of 20-40 cm diameter and 10-20 cm deep into the soil. The pits are prepared during the dry season by farmers allowing the shallow holes to collect water, wind-driven soil particles, and plant debris [5]. Moisture becomes collected inside and below the pits that also serve as localized targets for soil fertility improvement. The technique can improve millet and sorghum production by Blending Climate Action and Rural Development in Africa's Sahel DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.103817 60-90% depending on precipitation and soil fertility. When properly managed, these pits become a permanent feature of the field that collects off-season or early rainfall.Exploiting water from rivers and streams during the rainy season to fill channels and direct them to adjacent fields by construction of spates is a strategic small-scale irrigation system. Spate is an ancient approach but under some circumstances, it remains relevant today [5]. This system diverts water from normally dry riverbeds at the onset of seasonal rains and directs it to croplands, converting them into seasonal flood plains. Community consensus assures equitable distribution of these floodwaters, including those further downstream that also rely upon the same water. Managing floodwater is inherently difficult because of the power they hold, but the rewards to managing these waters in arid and semiarid areas are great, and for this reason, the opportunity exists in public support of spate irrigation as a localized civil engineering challenge.Irrigation assures that the water requirements of crops are met and the development of community-based irrigation schemes is an essential component of agricultural development in the Sahel [5]. Irrigation consists of two phases, the first where water is diverted from its source and delivered to the vicinity of croplands, and the second where it is applied to fields in a scheduled and calculated manner. Application strategies vary with the volumes, quality, and pressure of water delivery and may be grouped into flood, furrow, sprinkler, and drip irrigation. Irrigation presents a key solution to addressing present and future crop production constrains due to the effects of climate change on weather patterns. Within the context of practical rural development, a focus upon small-scale irrigation schemes in addition to larger, more centralized schemes should be considered.These technologies relate to more efficient use of mineral fertilizers, maximizing symbiotic biological nitrogen fixation and improved use of farmer-available organic resources.Fertilizer micro-dosing is based on the application of small amounts of mineral fertilizer in a shallow hole about 5 cm away from the crop stem [15]. Micro-dosing is as simple as applying one bottle cap filled with 3-5 g of fertilizer to each planting hole and is best combined with the addition of organic materials, particularly composts and manures. The total amount of fertilizer used in micro-dosing can vary significantly depending on the planting density, ranging from 50 to 100 kg of fertilizer per ha. This addition results in healthier crops that are better able to counteract mid-and late-season drought as a means to adapt to increased climate variability. A well-timed dose of fertilizer results in increased crop yields ranging from 40% to 120%, providing high returns to modest investment. The micro-dosing technique significantly increases the use efficiency of nutrients and water, particularly when combined with other climate-smart practices such as zaï pits [5].The key to achieving high crop yields and maintaining soil fertility is to apply the right fertilizers at the correct rate and time. Too often, timing is ill considered, particularly in relation to nitrogen (N) topdressing of field crops. Typically, N fertilizer is added to soils once or twice over the season, first as a pre-plant addition and second as a single topdressing, but more frequent and smaller doses are more efficient [27]. The basic principle of this approach is to apply a small quantity of N at planting and progressively add moderate amounts as topdressing during periods with sufficient rainfall when plant nutrient demand is largest. Farmers can top-dress N using readily accessible types of fertilizers such as urea and calcium ammonium nitrate, and the total application rate is based on yield targets and regional recommendations [5]. In some cases, N can be added just prior to, and worked into the soil during weeding, resulting in more efficient combined field operations.Legumes are very important to the rainfed cropping systems of the Sahel, particularly cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) [20]. Intercropping is best practiced by farmers during years of favorable rainfall by growing understory grain legumes between cereal rows at very low densities. More common is crop rotation of cereal and legumes, with a few (e.g. two-four) cycles of cereals punctuated by legumes [15]. Legumes access atmospheric nitrogen through symbiosis with rhizobia, a process that provides both additional protein to the household and residual nitrogen to the land [28]. The rhizobia needed for biological nitrogen fixation of these crops are often native, but their populations may be suppressed in hot, dry soils [14]. When well nodulated, nitrogen fixation is sufficient to secure a grain legume harvest and contribute about 50 kg or so organic nitrogen to the following crop. Unfortunately, legume inoculants containing elite strains of rhizobia are not widely available across the Sahel, so need exists to develop the capacity to manufacture and distribute them through commercial channels [5].A majority of soils in the Sahel are characterized by low water holding capacity and limited availability of plant nutrients because of their low clay and high sand content [15]. Farmers across these cereal-based drylands must better manage organic resources in ways that optimize limited rainfall and costly inputs of mineral fertilizer [13]. The maintenance of soil organic matter and carbon stocks is strongly determined by the amount of crop residues available for addition to soils and the competing need for livestock feed and stalks as cooking fuel and building material. Mulches that cover soil surfaces greatly reduce soil erosion, runoff, and evaporation, leading to about 70% increased cereal harvest. Incorporating fresh plant materials or animal manure is another option to compensate for unfavorable soil physical properties. At the same time, mineral fertilizers applied in conjunction with organic resources have greater nutrient use efficiencies. These examples of Integrated Soil Fertility Management illustrate the need for farmers to make best and balanced use of crop residues and other available organic resources [14].Blending Climate Action and Rural Development in Africa's Sahel DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.103817Several systems improvements result in more resilient agricultural landscapes and are best implemented at the community or landscape levels including the control of insect invasions, elimination of parasitic striga, introduction of trees to open croplands, improvement to rotationally grazed lands, and the local production of biogas.The Sahel is characterized by major invasions of insect pests such as the yellow desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria) and fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda). These outbreaks pose a major threat for farm households and undermine larger efforts to strengthen food systems [29]. Locusts are notoriously difficult to control once large swarms accumulate and spread over expansive areas. Following favorable rains, vegetation is sufficient for multiple generations of locust to spread across agricultural landscapes, devouring everything in their path. Early warning and preventative control are keys to stopping locust populations from reaching epidemic proportions. Spraying with chemical insecticides controls desert locust but to be most effective, insecticides must be applied directly onto migrating swarms. Spraying interventions for smaller areas can be performed by teams on foot with knapsacks, whereas for larger areas there is need for vehicle mounted nebulizers or specialized spray planes.The invasion of fall armyworm across cereal croplands throughout Africa, including the Sahel, also represents a major threat to food security [30]. TAAT offers a rapid response kit consisting of a custom-built cargo tuktuk, power sprayers, safety equipment, commercially recommended pesticides, farmer information, and communication materials [5]. Early control of armyworm is also achieved through maize seed treatment with Syngenta's FORTENZA DUO, offering protection to maize crops up to 4 weeks after germination. Authorities in countries worst affected by fall armyworm are encouraging all maize seed producers to treat their seed with this product.Striga is a parasitic weed-attacking cereal and other grass and invading cropland of the Sahel. The damage inflicted by striga begins underground where its roots enter the host, feeding on its nutrients and moisture and releasing toxins into the plant causing twisted, discolored, and stunted growth [31]. After feeding below ground for 4-5 weeks, a fast-maturing shoot emerges that produces attractive spikes of violet (Striga hermonthica) or red (Striga asiatica) flowers that mature into capsules containing abundant, tiny, long-lived seeds. Parasitism greatly reduces crop yields. Striga attacks millet and sorghum, but these crops show some tolerance to its effects; maize is more severely affected. Farmers respond to striga by hand weeding and, less often, burning affected fields, but the efficacy of these practices remains questionable considering the large numbers of tiny seed that a single, mature plant produces and returns to the soil.The agricultural community has responded by developing several new approaches to striga control. These approaches involve crop resistance to systemic herbicides, striga-tolerant cereal varieties, and striga suppression by nonhosts and trap cropping [32]. Farmers must become aware that striga infestation is a solvable problem and gain experience in the use of breakthrough technologies. Local and national authorities must fully recognize the threat posed by striga and prioritize efforts to overcome it within rural development agendas. By attacking this plant parasite through a combination of approaches, it is now a solvable problem and offers an important element of comprehensive rural development packages wherever this parasitic weed occurs.Great potential for agricultural transformation exists through the conversion of open-field cropping to agroforestry parkland [33]. These parklands appear as wellspaced trees that protect the soil and contribute to soil fertility renewal. Because of these benefits, the crops that grow near or below these trees often perform better than those in an open field. Parklands also sequester significantly greater carbon stocks than open croplands in a way that mitigates emissions of greenhouse gasses. These increased carbon stocks may be 20 or 40 MT C per ha greater than that retained by open cropland and hold potential to sequester carbon into deeper soil horizons [34]. The agroforestry parklands that appear in the cultivated drylands are often the result of clearing trees rather than planting them, and this creates difficulty in carbon accounting, but when open cropland is purposefully transitioned to agroforestry parkland, the carbon gains are clear and attributable to the efforts from tree planting and protection [5].Afforestation of open croplands is best practiced at the community level because of the demand for quality tree seedlings, the need to plant them at scale, and the collective responsibility to protect them until these trees are well established.Transitioning from degrading open cropland to productive agroforestry parkland should be considered within agricultural development efforts as sound from both the food security and climate action perspectives, noting that success also involves capacity development at the community and extension advisory levels.Raising livestock is a critical enterprise across the Sahel but overgrazing has resulted in extensive land degradation [35]. Cattle, sheep, and goats are regarded as assets among pastoralists living in areas too dry for reliable farming, and strategies are available to improve the grazing and forages that these lands provide. Water harvesting technologies presented in this paper may be practiced on noncultivated lands planted with improved grasses and browse species, particularly near watering holes where animals are likely to concentrate during the dry season. Stover and stubble of cereal fields are grazed following the harvest of millet, sorghum, and maize, and these lands are then fertilized by the manure that is deposited. While this system is robust as long as rotational intervals are of sufficient length, these systems begin to degrade if cropping becomes to frequent. One means to strengthen the crop-livestock system is to improve these rotational pastures using either annual or perennial grasses. These grasses not only provide feed for livestock, but they provide ground cover that resists wind and water erosion.Improved rangeland management falls into four general categories that are best applied in packages. Agronomic measures are associated with annual crops in a rotational sequence and are impermanent and of short duration. Vegetative measures involve the use of perennial grasses, shrubs, or trees and are of longer-term duration. Structural measures reduce erosion and capture water and may result in a permanent change in landscape. Management measures involve a fundamental change in land use and may be directed through policy intervention [35]. Improved rangeland management is best conducted at the community level where lands are collectively managed. This participation reduces the risks of conflicts between farming and livestock that often lead to larger social misunderstandings.This technology refers to the production of combustible gas within small-scale digesters at the household level. It is based on the utilization of plant and animal residues as organic wastes that are decomposed in anaerobic tanks, forming methane and a digested slurry byproduct useful as an organic fertilizer and soil amendment [36]. Gasses rise and collect through an outlet for burning as cooking fuel and the sediments sink into sludge for later collection. Gasses may be produced in a variety of vessels located above-or belowground. These reactors may be fashioned from metal tanks, built from concrete, or purchased as complete units. Attraction to this technology is growing across the Sahel because of its socioeconomic and environmental benefits, and it has a proven ability to improve the lives of rural households that would otherwise burn wood and charcoal, or cook using purchased kerosene [5]. The diversification of energy supply creates economic opportunity to those who build and equip these digesters, and it reduces local air pollution and deforestation due to firewood collection and charcoal making, and increases sequestration of carbon into soils amended with the digested organic sludge. Carbon sequestration is also achieved by the substitution of renewable energy production from methane as compared to reliance upon fossil fuels. Biogas generation is best considered among a suite of rural development options that are designed to educate stakeholders and supply the hardware and infrastructure it requires [37]. managing about 124,000 ha and leading to the increased production of 199,000 MT of grain worth US $42 million. Individual households greatly benefited in terms of food security, and the average increase income from participating in the technology delivery effort was about US $504 (calculated as a weighted average from Table 2). Activities involved 16 partnerships and delivered 1391 MT of improved certified seed. The right technologies taken to scale can deliver benefits to partnering farming communities that rely upon millet and sorghum as a staple crop. Investment in TAAT technologies results in economic gain across a wider selection of commodities as well. Table 3 provides information on the increased yields of five cereal crops (rice, wheat, maize, sorghum, and millet), increased cost of production and economic returns to that investment. The average increased productivity was 1.3 MT ha −1 worth US $333 resulting from $136 increased investment, mostly as fertilizers. This results in an average increased value of US $197, ranging from $85 (for millet) and $299 for rice. Note that except for rice, these crops were grown under rainfed conditions. The partial benefit to cost ratio ranges between 1.8:1 (for millet) and 3.2:1 (for maize), suggesting that economic returns are solid but not spectacular.Table 4 shows projections of carbon sequestration resulting from TAAT interventions to cereal production including system gains, values, and household contributions. These projections are based on reports of increased yield, coverage, numbers of adopters (see Table 2), and assumptions concerning biomass, moisture content, Harvest Index, crop carbon content, CO 2 e:crop C ratio, planning horizons, and the price of CO 2 e. This approximation allows for the estimation of realizable gains of CO 2 e associated with increased biomass and residual benefits in terms of CO 2 e gain per ha and as total average gain per project-year and household [18]. Realizable gains were achieved based on increased focus upon climate-smart field practices and products within the technology toolkits employed by participating farmers and development projects. This approach results in estimated CO 2 e gains averaging 4.4 MT ha −1 across these five cereals and a total of 2.1 million MT of CO 2 e per year worth about US $65 million. When the number of adopters is considered, this amounts to per capita emissions reductions of 1.5 MT CO 2 e per household per year, similar to the targets established by Branca et al. [38] and Lipper et al. [39]. This analysis is incomplete, as it does not take into account carbon losses from other farming practices; rather it focuses on peak seasonal increases.The feasibility of organizing small-scale African farmers into a force devoted to carbon sequestration is an exciting opportunity, but one that does not greatly benefit individual climate-smart practitioners from the standpoint of direct financial benefit as their gains are worth only $16 household per year at current prices of CO 2 e. The The TAAT Clearinghouse is developing a conceptual and mathematical model useful in understanding and managing agricultural transformation in Africa. This model has both qualitative and quantitative features.These realms are based on the roles and responsibilities of three interacting driving sectors: policy, markets, and farmers. It assumes that policies drive public works and rural development programs, markets determine the scope and appeal of commercial products and related investments, and farmers undertake individual and local collective actions. When these roles are depicted along three triangular coordinates, a conceptual model emerges that contains different transformational realms, many of them widely recognized. Grassroots actions occur where farmers dominate adoption processes (Figure 1), commerce is conducted where businesses buy and sell agricultural technologies, and government-led parastatal operations exist where government controls agricultural opportunities and trade. Other familiar blended realms exist including agricultural extension, public-private partnerships, and farmer-commercial alliances (e.g. out-grower networks). At the center of these activities, we identify complex alliances, where all three drivers meet on equal terms to pioneer progressive change. Each of these seven realms is briefly described.Grassroots actions (upper center) are localized in scope and conducted by farmers and their communities as opposed to being guided by those in more centralized Based on the annual increase of CO 2 e and overall mean weighted by beneficiary households from Table 2.Estimated carbon offsets from the adoption of TAAT technologies by African cereal producers (based on [18]).positions of power. Farmers belonging to grassroots organizations rely on individual and collective action to effect desired local change and often receive guidance from local agrodealers and extensionists.Business-led development (lower left) incorporates a range of strategies aiming to establish markets and provide economic opportunities that drive rural growth and employment opportunities. In more advanced settings, the private sector plays the lead role in research and development as well, translating breakthrough technologies into useful products and services.Farmer-business alliances (center left) allow small-scale producers to transition into commercial agriculture by providing information, inputs, and markets, usually based on a focus commodity. This alliance can operate as out-grower schemes and is further advanced through digital services and e-commerce platforms. The \"farm to fork\" approach relies upon such alliances.Public-private partnership (center bottom) is an agreement between the public and private sectors for the purpose of accelerated delivery of products or services beyond the reach of either. In some cases, it increases the efficiency of public services, and in others it is intended as an accelerated pathway to privatization. It may be based on contracts where government assigns some of its responsibilities to a private partner and often involves joint investment under terms attractive to business. Blending Climate Action and Rural Development in Africa's Sahel DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.103817Agricultural extension (center right) applies new knowledge to agricultural practices through farmer education and advisory services, leading into increased productivity and improved livelihood. It relies on farm visits, group interactions (e.g. demonstrations and field days), and mass information campaigns and is increasingly reliant on digital devices and linkage to education systems. The effectiveness of current extension systems in Africa is often questioned.Parastatals (lower right) are organizations operating under political authority, often as a state-capitalistic form of agricultural production. They are often criticized for being inefficient, corrupt, and for underpaying producers but at the same time have a proven ability to transfer modern farming techniques and new commodities to small-scale producers. Parastatals are increasingly targeted for privatization through public-private partnership.Progressive complex alliances (center triangle) represent a difficult to achieve form of stakeholder partnership that effectively balances the interests of rural communities and the private and public sectors. In many cases, the loans from development banks are focused on combined actions involving these stakeholders through their combined participation and investment, although formula for success remains ambiguous as it involves complex, knowledge-rich problem-solving across competing interests and site-specific settings.Successful partnership within rural development programs striving for agricultural transformation, particularly within the realm of progressive complex alliances, requires effective communications between sectors (Figure 2). Between farming communities and the public sector, these communications involve advocacy on behalf of agricultural producers and their workers, and effective response from agricultural extension services. This dual mechanism ensures that public investment in advisory services is demand-driven. Unfortunately, rural communities often find it difficult to express their needs, and those that do so on their behalf may behave opportunistically. At the same time, public agricultural extension services are too often understaffed and underresourced, yet it is this communication that can lead to more efficient performance by extension specialists and project designers.Communication between farming communities and the private sector is more direct. Businesses stream input products through agrodealer networks to farming communities and later purchase their surpluses through buyers. Accompanying these input products is information about them that is intended to achieve or maintain various competitive advantages. Farmer feedback on the availability, efficacy, and affordability of these input products is mainly felt in terms of seasonal purchases. At the same time, businesses seek direct feedback from potential customers to guide their selection of product lines and advertising campaigns. One difficulty in this dual mechanism is the inability of poorer farmers to purchase the full suite of recommended input products proven to maximize their production. There is also the risk that unless accompanying technologies are properly bundled, the returns to any one technology may be disappointing. This communication mechanism can lead to alliances between farmers and businesses in terms of bulk purchase of production inputs and better coordinated marketing of produce.Interactions between the private and public sector are focused on regulatory approval of products and steering financial incentives, often in ways designed to maximize profits or taxation and that often bypass farming communities. Nonetheless, the opportunities for co-investment into modernizing technologies through these dealings are enormous and can lead to the formulation of needed public-private partnerships that indirectly benefit farmers. One risk of this dialog, however, is where haphazard or opportunistic privatization may result in parastatal inefficiencies being replaced with private sector excesses.Clearly, the optimal situation is where tripartite communication leads to the design and successful implementation of rural development projects that engage and benefit all three parties: rural communities, the private sector, and government (Figure 2). These complex alliances require problem-solving with clear agreement of which difficulties exist, how to merge possible solutions within everyone's best interests, and how different options most appealing to those different interests may be blended or pursued simultaneously. From the programmatic perspective, it is also important to establish how resulting activities may be accurately and continuously monitored within the context of contingencies and corrective adjustment. This level of communication as it relates to the deployment of modernizing agricultural technologies in Africa has proven to be no easy matter. Technologies may be positioned within the agricultural transformation triangle assuming that the relative importance of the three different drivers can be assigned (Figure 3). This positioning is based on the relative importance of each driver in the deployment of technologies and development outcomes, recognizing that all of them must ultimately be acceptable to rural households to become widely adopted, whether as technology customers or management practitioners. This approach, applied to the 17 technologies appearing in Table 1, results in clusters of technologies including those that are mainly achieved through grassroots efforts (upper center), or by private sector investment (lower left). Note that the positioning of new cereal varieties depends largely on whether they are hybridized or open pollinated, as the latter allows for communitybased and farmers-own seed production. Also note that systems-level changes (e.g. containment of insect invasions, elimination of Striga, agroforestry parkland establishment) require greater involvement of the public sector. One advantage of this approach is that technologies appearing in different clusters and within realms (see Figure 1) can be considered mutual objectives within a program's operational framework.Substantial if not ample investment in the agriculture of the Sahel occurs (Table 5). Researchers at the Policy Analysis and Research Group at of Evans School of Public Policy and Governance (University of Washington) recently compiled data from three major International Financial Institutions (The World Bank, the African Development Bank, and the International Fund for Agricultural Development) to provide insights into the \"Investment Landscape\" in Africa [40]. The database contains all investments in 46 sub-Saharan African countries from the three IFIs as of May 2021 and includes \"active\" or \"implementation\" projects, loans, grants, or other financial investments [40]. To make funding by country more comparable, investments were annualized by dividing the total financial commitment per project by the number of years of implementation. Codes were applied that allowed summation for Sahelian countries including Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, and South Sudan, but not those with a small portion falling within the Sahel (e.g. Benin, Cameroon, and Nigeria). Annual investment in agricultural development across all of sub-Saharan Africa totaled US $6.24 billion in 2019, with 11% of it (=$0.68 billion) directed to the Sahel. This amount is proportionate in terms of population (±0.3%) and represents 20.1% of total IFI investment. Considering the importance of agriculture in the Sahel, this percentage seems somewhat low.Overall, the per capita annual investment from the three IFS in the Sahel zone is about $30. What can be done with this resource and how may it best be leveraged toward greater benefit? Table 3 suggests that the cost of modernizing Sahelian farming is about $136 per ha, so these funds are only sufficient for improved production on only 0.22 ha on a household basis. This intervention results in an additional 288 kg food production and revenues worth $73. These modest gains can lead to substantial improvement in lives. If 50% of the funds earmarked to smallholder agriculture in the Sahel (about $295 million, calculated from Table 5) was directed to the delivery of TAAT cereal technologies, this is sufficient to \"jump start\" improved production across 2.17 million ha (calculated from Tables 3 and 5) resulting in 2.8 million additional tons of cereal and profits of over $560 million per year from improved agriculture. A similar analysis may be performed based on funds directed to cultivated lands rather than households ( investment is sufficient to modernize production on 0.34 ha, producing about 445 kg of additional cereal, leading to a huge improvement in food security (calculated from Tables 3 and 5). These same gains would lead to an estimated additional 3.3 million MT of sequestered CO 2 e across the Sahel worth $71 million (calculated from Table 4), assuming that buyers for that offset due to climate adaptation can be found. One complication, however, is that the costs of directly quantifying carbon offsets on a smallholder farm may well be greater than the value of those offsets themselves ($33 calculated from Table 4). Clearly, potential exists for combined agricultural development and climate action given the current level of development investment, and the challenge is to better realize these gains so that even more investment will follow.Modernizing technologies literally bring scientific breakthroughs to life in ways that reduce risks and better manage cause-to-effect relationships. Technology transfer determines how this modernization occurs as a process involving a wide assortment of stakeholders from government, the private sector, financial institutions, and research, civil, and educational institutions [41]. This process intends to work on behalf of both the holders of technologies and those who stand to benefit from them most. In the case of climate action through the deployment of agricultural technologies, these users are primarily land managers directed toward larger global needs through practical self-interest, mainly acquisition of more secure harvests and greater protection of farm resources. Policies may set the stage for change, but ultimately environmental gains are achieved through combinations of purchased inputs and improved management practice, with each category representing a different type of technology holder. Input delivery is largely the concern of the private sector in terms of commercial distribution; and management practices are influenced by agricultural service providers, including public extension. Change is quickest when the two work in conjunction, and this forms both a challenge and opportunity to the design of rural development projects. Two large regional programs of the African Development Bank are well positioned to benefit from the technologies and deployment approaches described in this chapter, The Programme for Integrated Development and Adaptation to Climate Change in the Niger Basin (PIDACC [6]) and The Horn of Africa Project. PIDACC is funded through the Niger River Authority and TAAT is one of its funded partners. It covers nine countries in the Niger River Basin: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Cote D'Ivoire, Guinea, Mali, Niger, and Nigeria. Its activities include climate-smart technologies related to rice, maize, wheat, as well as soil and water management applied at the field, household, and landscape levels. It operates under the premise that farmers who adopt and exchange improved crop varieties, proactively manage pest outbreaks, better utilize water resources, and maintain soil fertility are in a much stronger position to secure food and income for their families and protect their agricultural resource base.Horn of Africa is an AfDB regional project at an advanced stage of preparation. Its partner countries will deploy proven, climate-smart agriculture technologies across Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan, and Sudan from 2022 to 2028. The objective of the project is to build resilient food and nutrition insecurity and climate change response, engage women and youth, and reinforce peace and security across the Horn of Africa. Specifically, it aims to (1) improve agro-sylvo-pastoral productivity, (2) increase incomes from that production, and (3) enhance the adaptive capacity of the populations to better prepare for and manage climate risks. Clearly, the right technologies, including those featured in this chapter, are required to achieve these goals. AfDB is also leveraging co-financing from major climate funds in ways that can impact upon UNFCCC Nationally Determined Commitments.There is a strong relationship between dryland soil and water management technologies available to small-scale farmers and the need for climate action in the Sahel and elsewhere [19]. Within the context of risk reduction, many of the technologies appearing in this chapter are intended to adapt to climate extremes, particularly higher temperatures, moderate drought, and erratic and intense rainfall. These adaptive technologies are particularly important at the field and household level. Farmers that better capture rainfall or protect their cropland soils from wind and water erosion are better able to feed their families. The same is true for communities that adopt and exchange improved seed of open pollinated cereals such as millet and sorghum. In this way, adaptation to climate extremes offers a \"drawdown\" of greenhouse gasses that are accumulating in the atmosphere.The most direct mitigative effects are to increase standing biomass and to manage that biomass in ways that become sequestered into soil organic matter and woody biomass. This is readily feasible using improved soil and water management practices across large areas of land over sufficient times to realize these gains. In general, about 50% of increased productivity is carbon and a small proportion of that enters the soil as residues for longer-term retention. One means to greatly increase standing biomass is to move from rainfed to irrigated agriculture, and another is to rehabilitate lands that are degraded and overgrazed. It is possible to combine adaptive and mitigative technologies as when bunds intended to capture water and reduce erosion are planted with perennial vegetation. Also, the same contour structures used to protect croplands may be constructed in adjacent rangeland to assist in the re-establishment of native vegetation. At the same time, carbon gains in rangelands must be weighed against the increased livestock carrying capacity and the methane they release through digestion.Substantial opportunity for carbon gains across landscapes exists through the steady transition from open-field cultivation to managed parklands, often through the introduction of economically useful trees. The agroforestry techniques to achieve this transition are well described. Re-vegetation has a transnational dimension through the ambitious Great Green Wall for the Sahel and Sahara Initiative to act as a barrier to further desertification [42]. Another proactive mitigation response occurs through bio-digestion in terms of fossil fuel replacement. One huge advantage of mitigation over adaptation is that quantified carbon gains may then be offered for sale and traded with polluters as a condition of their continued emissions. Another is that they can be applied to the Nationally Determined Contributions of countries within climate agreements [43]. Ultimately, rural development projects and climate actions must be viewed as one and the same."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4662555900.json b/main/part_2/4662555900.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b367416af78000d64a2aa316fe3cdd4afc0b26d --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4662555900.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"40e2a9b6ef9916014eab98d1e89a0255","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/51f920d0-3229-4d52-be0a-ce91ad702111/retrieve","id":"-647887874"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"62b52570-70ce-49c7-be43-c4e8fb4a88d2","content":"Nearly 1 billion people worldwide live with severe hunger and poverty. Paradoxically, the majority are farmers who struggle to obtain food and a livelihood from small plots, despite declining soil health, worsening plant disease and pest problems, an increasingly variable climate, and weak policies and markets. Enabling farmers to defeat these challenges, and hunger and poverty, requires research and innovation.CIAT is just as dedicated to this task today as it was when the Center opened its doors in 1967. The difference is that the Center now brings to the fulfillment of its mission nearly 5 decades of experience. At the core of CIAT's mission and strategy is the concept of eco-efficiency. We strive to make production more competitive and profitable as well as sustainable and resilient through economically and ecologically sound use of natural resources and purchased inputs.Crop improvement is a key leverage point for achieving those aims. CIAT conducts research globally on cassava, common bean, and tropical forages as well as on rice in Latin America and the Caribbean. Our researchers work in two other critical areas as well -soils and policy analysiswhich cut across all tropical crops and environments.Through research on soil management and land restoration, the Center opens new pathways toward sustainable intensification of crop production, while improving the ecosystem services on which rural communities depend.our strategies and programs promote gender equality and women's empowerment.The Center has a proven record of delivering results that address the challenges smallholders must face as well as a solid reputation for integrity, innovation, and transparency in all of its activities. We take pride in our strong and growing partnerships with NGOs, governments, the private sector, donors, and other CGIAR centers around the world.CIAT and its partners deliver new technologies, methods, and knowledge that better prepare farmers to meet current and future needs. The Center leverages the power of scientific and policy research to drive agricultural innovation and rural development. We're proud of our ability to generate cost-effective, equitable solutions to poverty and food insecurity, which can be scaled up to deliver lasting impact.CIAT has a strong presence across the tropics, with headquarters in Colombia and regional offices in Kenya and Vietnam. Our global team assesses opportunities to achieve food security and sustainable development, and responds with unique approaches designed to produce sustainable changes in crop production, agricultural value chains, rural landscapes, and policies that positively shape smallholder farmers' lives.CIAT develops scalable solutions to farmer needs.Switzerland has been a high-profile partner of CGIAR since its founding in 1971. With this commitment, Switzerland is fulfilling the pledge of its Federal Constitution to contribute to \"the relief of poverty and suffering in the world, respect for human rights and promotion of democracy, the peaceful co-existence between peoples, and the protection of the natural basis for life.\" Switzerland's international cooperation in agricultural research for development is greatly influenced by current global trends and challenges. These include pressure on natural resources, climate change, population growth, and weak policies, markets, and institutions, all of which are making the lives of the rural poor more difficult.Global challenges call for globally coordinated solutions. That's why CGIAR and CIAT work closely with the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Switzerland's international cooperation agency within the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA). CIAT's mission is in harmony with the commitment of SDC's Global Programme Food Security to a world free of hunger and malnutrition in which smallholders contribute healthy food that is accessible to all, while increasing their incomes and safeguarding the environment. SDC's ongoing investment in the CIAT-coordinated Pan-Africa Bean Research Alliance (PABRA) has been especially impactful. As a result of the network's interventions, more farming families have access to improved bean varieties with strong market appeal, new crop management techniques, micronutrient-rich bean products, and valuable skills and knowledge.Switzerland also makes available the scientific and technical resources of a large number of public and private institutions, such as ETH Zurich and Lausanne, the University of Bern, Swiss Tropical Institute, Nestlé, Agroscope, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, and Swiss College of Agriculture.We thank Switzerland for giving agricultural research high priority in its national development policy. SDC's strategic investments in CIAT over the years have contributed significantly to our mutual goals towards sustainable rural development. We look forward to strengthening our partnership and contributing to our shared aims of transforming the global food system.Rising to the challenge By growing upwards, climbing beans produce up to three times more than bush beans on the same area of land. They also permit two growing seasons per year and in some regions, three.Climbing beans make a lot of sense in Rwanda, which is fast running out of land. Already one of the most densely populated countries in the world, Rwanda's population of around 11 million people is expected to nearly quadruple by the turn of the century. Given the country's pressing need to sustainably boost food production, the introduction and widespread adoption of improved climbing beans offer great promise as part of a broad package of measures.Beans are crucial to the Rwandan diet as a source of protein. But \"climbers\" also help protect against soil erosion, and some of the improved varieties released by the Rwanda Agriculture Board (RAB) -through the CIAT-coordinated, SDC-supported Pan-Africa Bean Research Alliance (PABRA) -are disease resistant and higher in essential nutrients like iron and zinc.In just a few years, the improved varieties have become the beans of choice for many smallholders, and their high productivity has transformed beans in Rwanda from a subsistence to a cash crop. The country now produces more beans than it can consume and exports the surplus. It even supplies the new varieties to scientists in other Central and East African countries for their own bean improvement programs.Climbing beans make excellent use of limited space, and can produce yields three times higher than bush beans.Hoa Bui, an ethnic minority farmer, lives in a stilted house nestled amid green sloping fields in Vietnam's upland northwestern district of Tan Lac. When she started growing chayote -the leafy vegetable enveloping everything around the house -she fetched a high market price for it, earning the family food security, enough money to buy a gas cooker, and gasoline to take the children to school.But the proverbial honeymoon with the green leaf is over. The market has become a bit crowded, driving prices down. In 2010, Hoa Bui's village planted 3.5 hectares of chayote. Now, that figure is 30. This year, Hoa Bui and some other farmers are switching to more lucrative crops to sell in Hanoi's biggest food markets.It might seem odd to boast about the fact that a crop promoted by the \"Small-scale agro-enterprise development in the uplands (SADU)\" project, managed by CIAT and funded by SDC, is being swapped for alternatives. But the project's work was less about chayote and more about responding to the market. Judging what niche crop to cultivate instead of chayote, based on how alternatives are doing in the market, did not occur to farmers like Hoa Bui in the past.Farmers learned how to conduct a very basic cost-benefit analysis, deciding where to invest their resources for maximum returns, based on current trading patterns and prices. Equally impressive is the fact that their produce still ends up in some of the finest restaurants in the country more than 4 years after the project has ended.Of course, SADU staff were not only concerned with facilitating markets. Chayote also has limited vulnerability to pests, and helps control soil erosion. In addition, climate conditions in the uplands allow communities to supply regional markets during the off-season. SADU further emphasized the need to build institutional links, provide training, and supply cutting-edge technologies.Smallholders mentored under the SADU project have reaped significant gains: Targeting mainstream markets, linking traders and farmers, and introducing farmers to improved technologies has paid off. In addition to selling chayote leaves, farmers can also feed them to pigs. Thanks to training in basic market economics, remote communities are testing niche markets by themselves, experimenting with high-value chili, coriander, and ginger.In 2010, Hoa's farm produced 1.6 tons of chayote fetching a net income of US$350. Had she harvested maize instead, she would have brought in no more than US$40.Today, SADU farmers continue to sell lucrative crops in Hanoi's biggest food markets, which ultimately end up at some of the city's top restaurants.good agronomic practices, such as adequate planting density and timely weeding. The partnership then began developing links between farmers and grain buyers, which helped to stabilize previously volatile prices. From there, the alliance engaged with policy makers, who, recognizing that beans could benefit farmers, traders, and the country, listed them on the Ethiopian Commodity Exchange, guaranteeing farmers the international market price for their beans.Between 2004 and 2012, the area of land used for growing beans in Ethiopia increased from 181,600 to 330,000 hectares, and bean production more than tripled. More importantly, farmers increased their income more than sixfold, from US$120 per ton of beans to $650, and the number of people employed to sort, process, and transport beans quadrupled to 12,000.The development of Ethiopia's bean market is just the tip of the iceberg. The approach has been so successful that not only has it been applied to other crops in Ethiopia, including chickpea, wheat, and sorghum, but it's also spreading to other countries. By working with partners to establish enabling conditions, CIAT and Switzerland are promoting sustainable economic growth.In Eastern Africa, a market-led approach is transforming agriculture, driving institutional change, and stimulating economic growth. At the center of this revolution are smallholder farmers growing improved white pea beans for export. CIAT and its partners in Ethiopia, working through the Pan-Africa Bean Research Alliance (PABRA), formed a coalition with all the players in Ethiopia's white pea bean industry, including farmers, research institutes, grain traders, community associations, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), seed producers, and policy makers. Together, they identified the major obstacles preventing growth in the industry -including limited access to improved bean seed -and decided to take joint responsibility for developing the sector.As the bottlenecks to seed production and distribution were removed, PABRA began promoting 6 PABRA's market-led approach is fueling economic growth.PABRA, through its wide-spanning network across 29 countries in Africa, harnesses private sector power to reach more farmers and consumers faster. PABRA collaborates with over 30 private seed companies of all sizes to promote improved bean seed adoption. For example, Dryland Seed Company in Kenya has increased seed sales to 250 tons, up from just 30 tons in 2010. PABRA's private sector partners produced and disseminated 9,360 tons of improved seed to nearly 3 million households in 2012 alone. By strategically engaging with private sector partners, CIAT builds its demand-driven relationships for major development impact."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4669659654.json b/main/part_2/4669659654.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29e28fe1517d60caeeff68a71eaed0ef2c8c0244 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4669659654.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f3630ddd9e65c8adb616219bff32afc9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/599f250d-b5c7-4087-a544-1d3281b82632/retrieve","id":"624944435"},"keywords":["income","greenhouse gas emissions","agriculture","smallholder","Nigeria 1. Introduction"],"sieverID":"0bb66dda-a690-4778-b40a-be9d3f3bb6fd","content":"This study analyses the trade-offs between welfare (measured by income) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions using a farm-level optimisation model that incorporates the predominant cereal (sorghum), legumes (groundnut, soybeans), livestock (cattle, goats and sheep) and trees (locust bean, camel's foot) representative of production systems at two contrasting sites in northern Nigeria. The optimisation model maximises the value of total farm production, subject to constraints on GHG reductions of 10%, 25% and the maximum reductions that allow households to meet minimum consumption requirements. Substantive reductions in livestock and legume production would be required to achieve the maximum possible reductions from current emissions and would reduce household income by 22% and 44%, respectively. Under current production practices, reductions in GHG emissions reduce household income, which suggests the need for further research on productivity-enhancing technologies that could both enhance income and reduce GHG emissions in these production contexts.climate change (Bellarby et al. 2014). There are few empirical studies on trade-offs between farmlevel GHG emissions and welfare (e.g. Paul et al. 2017) or on the potential productivity improvements required to avert trade-offs (Tittonell et al. 2015).Northern Nigeria provides a conducive context to evaluate trade-offs between welfare and agricultural GHG emissions due to the importance of smallholder farmer production. It may be a potential \"hot spot\" for GHG emissions (Rufino et al. 2015) because it is the most degraded region in the country (Farauta et al. 2011), given the severity of the loss of soil fertility and subsequent low productivity (Maiangwa et al. 2007). Furthermore, the potential trade-offs of reducing GHG emissions on smallholder farms are often unknown (Nicholson et al. 2011;Thornton et al. 2018).A key question is whether changes in smallholder farm-level production activities can reduce GHG emissions without negatively affecting household income. This research addresses this question for smallholder farms using crop-tree-livestock systems at two sites in northern Nigeria as case examples. The objective of this study was to assess trade-offs in reducing GHG emissions and income for two representative smallholder farms in northern Nigeria.This study developed farm-level linear optimisation models for each of two locations in northern Nigeria and used the models to assess the agricultural production patterns and full household income (value of goods produced, whether sold or not) with and without restrictions on GHG emissions. An optimisation model is appropriate in this case to assess the effects on income, resource allocation and market impacts (e.g. total supply and hired labour use) of restrictions on GHG emissions. A constrained optimisation analytical approach allows the assessment of counterfactual outcomes based on additional constraintsallowed amounts of GHG emissionsthat are difficult to assess with other approaches and the currently available data. The linear optimisation approach is employed in this case due to data limitations, although linear (or linearised) models have been applied commonly in many similar types of analyses (Van Wijk et al. 2014;Sempore et al. 2015).The study sites were located in Kano and Jigawa States in Nigeria (Figure 1). Kano State belongs to the Sudan ecological zone and is the most extensively irrigated state in the country (NAERLS & PRSD 2012). The homogeneity of the tree, crop and livestock production systems was responsible for the random selection of Bunkure local government area (LGAs) from 44 LGAs in Kano using the card method developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security ([FAO & CCAFS] 2012). Maigateri LGA in Jigawa State was purposively selected as an area with representative current tree, crop and livestock production practices due to the large number of livestock and its proximity to Zinder region in the Republic of Niger, where successful climate-smart technologies are already established (Reij & Smaling 2008). Both LGAs are characterised by numerous smallholder farms integrating grain (sorghum) and legume crops (soybean and groundnut), trees (locust bean [Parkia biglobosa] and camel's foot [Piliostigma reticulatum]), and livestock (cattle, goats and sheep). Sorghum grain and legume seeds are consumed by humans and the residues (fodder and bran) are fed to animals or sold. Leaves and seed pods from tree pods are used as animal feed, and branches and trunks are used for fuel.The optimisation model maximises the value of household agricultural production during a single year (with monthly periods for labour) subject to resource constraints (regarding land and labour), purchased input requirements, selected biophysical interactions among components of the crop-treelivestock production system (such as the use of residues for animal feed), livestock nutrient requirements and restrictions on GHG emissions. The model assumes fixed quantities to describe the input requirements for each of the components. The objective function to be maximised is:, where the subscripts are defined as follows: j is crop activity (one tree species, two crops at each location) p is crop product (grain, bran, hull, fodder, pod, pod valve, branch, trunk) a is animal activity (three livestock species: cattle, sheep, goats) q is animal product (milk, meat, manure) i is input (N fertiliser, urea, seed, other agricultural chemicals) and m is month of the year;and the variables are defined as: Z = annual value of all farm production less cash costs CROPPRODjp = annual production of product P from tree or crop activity J CROPPRICEjp = sales price per unit of product P from tree or crop activity J ANPRODaq = annual production of product Q from animal species A ANPRICEaq = sales price per unit of product Q from animal species A INPUTUSEi = annual use of purchased input I INPRICEi = purchase price per unit of input I WAGE = hourly wage paid to hired labour (same in all months) HIREDLABm = hours of hired labour in month M This objective function maximises the total value of products derived from farm production activities, 1 less the costs of hired labour and the value of purchased inputs. The activities that generate revenue for the farm household include trees, 2 sorghum, legumes, 3 cows, goats and sheep, each of which has sub-products used as inputs on the farm or sold (see the table in Appendix 1). A total of 20 (j, p) combinations of activities and sub-products are represented. Purchased inputs include fertiliser (NPK mix and urea), an aggregation of agricultural chemicals, and seed for grains and legumes.The quantities of tree and crop products generated by the farm household are a function of land allocated to each of the three tree and crop activities and associated product yields:where YIELD CROP jp = annual yield per hectare of product P from tree or crop activity J; CROPPRODjp = annual production of product P from tree or crop activity J.This equation indicates that the physical quantity of production of product P from tree or crop activity J is equal to the product yield per hectare times the amount of land allocated to the activity.The quantities of animal products generated by the farm household are a function of the number of animals kept and the yield of products per animal species per year:where YIELD ANIMAL aq = annual yield per animal of product Q from animal species A; ANPRODaq = annual production of animal product Q from animal species A.This equation indicates that the physical quantity of produced of product Q from livestock species A is equal to the product yield per animal times the number of animals.Land and labour are basic farm household resource constraints. Land in the study area is often classified into upland and lowland. The upland was modelled because it is the predominant land type used for rainfed production. The land constraint equation for the farm household was:where LANDj = hectares of land allocated to production of tree or crop J, and HHLAND = total cultivatable land available to the household.This inequality ensures that the land used for crop or tree production is less than or equal to the total available for use by the household. The labour constraint is given by:, where CROPLABjm = hours of labour required in month M for tree or crop activity J, ANLABam = hours of labour required in month M for animal species A, and HHLABm = hours of labour available from the farm household in month M.The monthly hours of labour required equal the labour requirements per unit of land allocated to J, times the hectares of land use for J and per animal of species A, times the number of animals of species A, and this must be less than the sum of available household labour and hired labour.The quantities of purchased inputs used for production are calculated based on land area and inputs required per hectare:where INPUTREQij = is the requirement of purchased input I per hectare of land used for tree or crop activity J, and INPUTUSEi = total annual use of input I.This equation indicates that the physical annual quantity of purchased input I used is equal to the amount of input I required per hectare times the amount of land allocated to the activity.Animal species represented in the model are assumed to require energy and protein for production, which must be consistent with both the minimum and maximum allowable quantities of dry matter (DM). The energy and protein constraints are specified as:, where NUTREQan = the annual requirement of nutrient N (metabolisable energy, ME; crude protein, CP) per animal of type A, FEEDjpa = annual amount of product P from crop or tree J allocated to animal type A, and NUTCONTENTjpn = content of nutrient N per product P from crop or tree type J.The amount of two nutrients in the feed provided to animals of species A (amount fed times nutrient content) must be greater than the total requirements of those animals.For the consumption of dry matter (DM) by animals, two equations are specified:where DMLOWa is the minimum required annual DM intake for animal type A, DMCONTENTjp is the DM content of the product P from crop or tree J, and DMHIGHa is the maximum allowed annual DM intake for animal type A.These two constraints imply that the annual DM in feed must be larger than a minimum required annual amount of DM intake by animal species A, but less than a maximum possible annual amount of DM (which is due to rumen fill constraints).The model also needs to ensure that the sources and uses of products in the model are consistent with a physical mass balance. This balance constraint for tree and crop activities is specified as:where HHREQCROPjp = exogenous minimum annual allowable household use requirement of product P from tree or crop J, which includes uses as food, gifts, construction and fuel, CROPSALESjp = annual amount sold of tree or crop product P from crop or tree type J, and INTINPUTjp = amount of crop product P from crop or tree type J used as an intermediate input in other crops. This constraint implies that the uses of tree and crop products are less than or equal to the amount available based on production. For animal products, an equation with a similar purpose is:HHREQAN aq + ANSALES aq + MILKCALF aq ≤ ANPROD aq , where HHREQANaq = exogenous minimum annual allowable household use requirement of product Q from animal type A, ANSALESaq = annual amount sold of animal product Q from animal type A, and MILKCALFaq = annual amount of milk needed to feed calves (cattle only). This constraint implies that the uses of animal products are less than or equal to the amount available based on production. The requirements of households for tree, crop and livestock products (HHREQCROPjp and HHREQANaq) are assumed to be exogenous. This implies that satisfying the balance constraint will require the household to produce quantities sufficient to meet these requirements. This constraint is a key determinant of the \"maximum allowable\" GHG reductions, that is, the \"maximum allowable reductions\" must be consistent with meeting the assumed household requirements for tree, crop and animal products.The model must also ensure that the use of manure required for crop production is consistent with the amount of manure produced by the animals:, where MANREQj = the annual amount of manure (from any animal species) required per hectare of land allocated to crop or tree J, and MANUREa = the annual amount of manure produced per animal type A. This constraint implies that the uses of manure in crop production are less than or equal to the total amount of manure (aggregated across all animal species) available based on animal production.A key addition to this analysis compared to others using a farm-level optimisation model is the calculation of GHG emissions from farm activities, given as:• GHGANIMAL a = TOTGHG, where GHGCROP j = the annual GHG emissions in CO 2 equivalents per hectare of land in activity J (for simplicity, this value does not include the effects of emissions from the application of lime, pre-farm operations during storage and transportation, as well as all mechanised farm operations, as these are minimal in this farming system), GHGANIMALa = the annual GHG emissions in CO2 equivalents per animal of type A, and TOTGHG = the total annual GHG emissions of the farm in CO2 equivalents. This equality calculates the total GHG emissions from farm tree, crop and livestock production. To assess the impacts of GHG reductions on farm activities and income, we specify an additional equation that limits GHG emissions:where GHGLIMIT = total annual GHG emissions allowed from the farm in CO2 equivalents.GHGLIMIT is the parameter modified in our scenarios to assess the effect on the objective function.The data to specify the parameters required for the optimisation model were derived from both primary and secondary sources. Primary data were obtained from a purposive sample using participatory rural appraisal (PRA) in the form of focus group discussions (FGD) and key-informant interviews. A total of 45 and 33 farmers participated in the FGD in Maigateri and Bunkure LGA respectively. A subsequent small-scale survey building on the FGD was administered to a random sample of 50 farm households in Maigateri and 55 farm households in Bunkure during the 2016/2017 production season. The FGD and survey (cited collectively as \"field survey data\" below) provide basic information about the characteristics of households and their farming systems. The size of the random sample was limited due to resource constraints, but the consonance between the FGD and the survey findings suggests that assumptions about household characteristics and farming systems are reasonably representative of some farm types at the two study sites. Secondary information to develop the empirical model included previous literature, publicly available market data and analyses conducted on a one-hectare field of sorghum-soybean under the canopy of eight locust bean trees in Bunkure and sorghum/groundnut cultivation beneath six camel's foot trees in Maigateri LGA. The secondary data provided input requirements, product outputs and GHG emissions.The analysis includes two tree species that are commonly used by households in the two study sites: locust bean (Parkia biglobosa) in Bunkure LGA and camel's foot (Piliostigma reticulatum) in Maigateri LGA. For each tree species, the model includes the production of fodder, seed pods (pods, pod valves and fibrous material or \"bran\") and wood from the branches and the main trunk. Fodder is a key resource of tree production and is used as mulch and organic matter for grain production and as feed for livestock. The data required include the annual yields of the tree products, prices of outputs, inputs used in tree production and input prices. Yields were estimated based on secondary sources (see the table in Appendix 2). The productivity of trees in the Sudano-Sahelian savannahs was estimated to be between 2.5 m 3 /ha/year and 3 m 3 /ha/year, with per capita fuel wood consumption of between 0.75 m 3 /day and 1.0 m 3 /day ( LGA. We assumed yields at 50% for locust bean, based on a comparison of information about the two species from the Pl@ntUse website (2016a, 2016b). Prices of inputs and outputs and input use were derived from the field survey activities (FGD, key informant interviews and household surveys).The analysis includes the production of sorghum grain at both sites (both are located in the Sudan Savanna zone, where precipitation is insufficient to support maize production), as well as common legumes, viz. soybean in Bunkure LGA and groundnut in Maigateri. Fodder, grain and hull (\"bran\") are important resources from these crops and are used by the household for food, construction materials and livestock feed. Similar to the case with the trees, the required information about crops includes product yields, input requirements, and the prices of inputs and outputs (see the tables in Appendix 3 and Appendix 4). Yield data derived from the field surveys were complemented by published literature related to the use of crop by-products in livestock production. For example, byproducts from sorghum and soybean/groundnut production were derived using the formula for harvest index in Powell et al. (1995) and Bayala et al. (2014). Input requirements were also derived from the field survey data, complemented with published sources (e. Three livestock species are commonly owned on farms at the two sites: cattle, goats and sheep. Cattle provide milk, whereas all species provide for the production of some meat and manure, the latter of which is used in the production of non-legume crops. The data included productivity per animal species, including milk from cattle and average meat offtake and manure for all species (see Appendix 5). The animal-specific data required for modelling included the weight, average dry matter (DM) intake, yields of products and output prices (see Appendix 6). This information was derived from the field survey data, complemented by the relevant literature (Powell et al. 1995;Dupriez & De Leener 1998; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO] 1998; Ayantunde et al. 2000Ayantunde et al. , 2011)). Manure is a key output, in addition to milk (from cattle) and meat, but its production is difficult to measure. Manure production per animal was estimated based on Powell et al. (1995) and Ayantunde et al. (2000).In addition to the information on the animals, data were required on the nutritional value of the plant products used to feed livestock. These data comprise the DM, energy and protein content of fodder and the by-products of trees, sorghum and the two legume crops (Appendix 6). Data on dry matter (DM), metabolisable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) were obtained from feed composition tables in Feedipedia (2017aFeedipedia ( , 2017b) ) and Dupriez and De Leener (1998). The recommended daily CP and DM requirement is 3% animal body weight (BW), with minimum recommended daily values of 2.5% and maximum possible values of 4.0% for cattle and 5.0% for sheep and goats. Per-animal ME requirements were 46.5 Megacalorie/day (Mcal/day) for cattle and 5.1 Mcal/day for sheep and goats. Values of ME for the maintenance of sheep, goats and cows producing less than five litres/day, derived by the FAO (1998), were adapted for the study area based on reported animal characteristics. Crude protein requirements for cattle were calculated as 0.4 kg/animal/day (for maintenance, growth and milk production), and 0.03 kg/animal/day for sheep and goats, based on animal characteristics from the field survey and FAO (1998) data on the animals' requirements.Calculating the amount of GHG emissions from farm production was the main component of our analysis, but site-specific empirical measurements were not availablesimilar to the case in relation to many other sites (Ortiz-Gonzalo et al. 2017). As a result, we used the guidance provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to estimate GHG emissions for the farmproduction activities at the two sites. (We did not include estimates of emissions related to household consumption or the marketing of products.) The IPCC (2006) defines three hierarchical tiers of methods used in the measurement of GHG emissions. These methods range from default emission factors and equations to the use of country-specific data and models to accommodate national circumstances. Generally, moving from tiers 1 to 3 improves the accuracy of estimation. However, it also increases the data needed for country-specific emission factors, as well as for land-use and management practices (i.e. activity data). In this study, the emission factors (EF) used to estimate GHG emissions were from the IPCC (2006) Tier 1 default equations based on data describing current farming systems in the region. A more detailed description of the methods used is provided in Appendix 7.We used Tier 1 default methods and emission factors (EFs) from the 2006 version of the guidelines of the IPCC (2007) that considered management practices on soils managed with applied nitrogen fertiliser inputs. Because the estimated carbon (C) sequestered in soil organic matter is greater than the C produced by soils, net emissions from soil organic matter (biomass) are assumed to be zero. Another source of GHG emissions is from burning biomass (such as crop residues). Values of CO2, nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) were calculated using biomass burned (0.01 tonnes DM/ha) multiplied by the applicable EF. Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from soils comprise both direct and indirect components of a manure management system (MMS) and managed soil (MS). Other N2O emissions are direct N emissions from nitrite (NO3), ammonia (NH3), and nitrous oxide (N2O) from manure, tree and crop residues and fertiliser. All nitrous oxide emissions were converted to CO2 equivalents (100-year global warming potential) using a multiplier of 310 from the IPCC (2007). The Tier 1 default EF of 0.20, which corresponds to 20% for CO(NH2)2, was used for calculating CO2 emissions from urea fertilisation. IPCC (2006) indicates that CO and NOx have limited direct global warming potential, so their effects are assumed to be zero. Production of sheep, goats and cows used for milk, meat, manure and draft results in CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation and the MMS. The EFs for developing countries for sheep, goat and mature cows grazing on large areas were used to compute livestock-related methane emissions, which were then converted to CO 2 equivalents. In accordance with the IPCC (2007), a unit of CH 4 represents 21 units of CO2eq. 2006) document based on input for practices and yields from field survey data and other secondary sources. The text provides additional descriptions of the specific calculations. Appendix 7 provides additional information and references.We determined a baseline scenario representing current production patterns and examined how production activities and household income would change subject to reductions in GHG emissions. Three scenarios were developed in addition to the baseline for each location:• 10% reduction in GHG emissions compared to the baseline; • 25% reduction in GHG emissions compared to the baseline;• Maximum GHG emissions reduction for the Bunkure and Maigateri LGAs consistent with maintaining minimum household consumption requirements for tree, crop and animal products.These scenarios allow an assessment of the magnitude of income-emissions trade-offs for different assumed reductions, motivated by the expectation that higher required reductions will imply larger household income reductions.Although many outputs could be reported from the optimisation analyses, we focused on the changes in full income, GHG emissions per farm per year and production patterns (Table 3). For each of the two LGAs, there exists a substantive trade-off between household income and reduction in GHG emissions, but the changes in production patterns and values of the trade-offs differ in the two areas, given their base production patterns and input usage. In both LGAs, the amount of foregone income to achieve a 10% reduction in GHG emissions is relatively small, at 1% Havlík et al. 2014;Herrero et al. 2014;De Pinto et al. 2016).The achievement of greater reductions in GHG emissions, of 25%, requires more adjustments to the production pattern of the farm, which now include changes in cropping pattern in addition to livestock reductions. In Bunkure, the reduction is achieved by lower production of tree and soybean outputs, which is accompanied by a reduction in the use of urea as a fertiliser. In contrast, for Maigateri, the 25% reduction is accomplished through decreased planting of groundnut in addition to reductions in livestock. However, another relevant effect is that the Maigateri household now has less need of hired labour, which is decreased by more than one-third as a result of the reductions in groundnut production. This analysis indicates that, although the net proportional influence on optimal farm income is similar in the two LGAs (17% and 18% respectively), the changes required to achieve these (optimal) reductions differ based on the production systemwhich suggests that farmingsystems specificity matters for the assessment of strategies to reduce GHG emissions.The maximum allowable GHG reduction while maintaining recommended household consumption levels is 26% in Bunkure. This reduction is accomplished through an additional reduction in tree and soybean outputs and the associated use of urea, so the pattern and effect on income are relatively similar to the scenario requiring a 25% reduction. In Maigateri, the maximum reduction in GHG emissions while maintaining household tree, crop and animal product availability is 30%, and this is accomplished through the additional reduction of groundnut cultivation, so again the adaptation of the production pattern is similar to that for the 25% reduction scenario. Importantly, nearly all labour hired in the baseline scenario is no longer necessary to achieve the maximum possible reduction.Requiring the reduction of GHG emissions on smallholder farms also affects the resource values (the marginal values of selected constraints, values not shown). In particular, the value of a marginal unit of land is reduced to zero if required reductions are 25%, which implies that the household would now not use all of its land (and by the assumptions of the model, would not rent it to other households, although this may be a possibilitybut not one that would be likely to achieve the desired reduction in GHG emissions). The marginal value of internally generated inputs, like fodder and manure, is also lowered by the restrictions, given that there is less need for their use. Finally, the marginal value of livestock products increased due to the scarcity of the products and because household production is now constrained to the amount required for household consumption, which means that there are no longer revenues generated from livestock product sales.It is useful to summarise the foregoing interactions between farm household welfare measured by full income and reductions in GHG emissions using two types of trade-off curves. An X-Y plot of GHG emissions and full income for the two LGAs (Figure 2) indicates the trade-offs between these outcomes, showing that initial reductions in GHG emissions require relatively limited foregone income, whereas the largest possible reductions in GHG emissions result in large income reductions. An alternative approach is to plot the costs of income foregone versus the achieved reductions in GHG emissions (Figure 3), which is conceptually similar to a marginal cost curve (in terms of income foregone) for reductions in GHG emissions. The marginal costs increase more rapidly for reductions in Bunkure than they do in Maigateri (although the starting income is also lower in Bunkure LGA). This implies that the costs of reductions in GHG emissions are likely to differ across production systems, which would suggest the need for additional site-specific analysis to inform decisions about least-cost GHG emissions strategies for smallholder agriculture in the region. A key finding of our analysis is that reducing GHG from smallholder agricultural activities in this region using current production methods would require substantive changes from current agricultural production patterns and reductions in farm income. Reductions in income with increasingly restrictive constraints on farm-level GHG emissions are not surprising, because by its nature a more constrained optimisation problem cannot show an improvement in the value of the objective function. Thus, the contribution of this work is to highlight the empirical magnitude of the effect of restrictions on farm household incomes, production patterns, resource use and resource values. Our analysis also suggests that these influences could transcend those on the farms analysed through their effect on quantities of hired labour, and through market availability of products due to reductions in sales by farm households. Productivity-enhancing technologies may offer a means to enhance income and reduce GHG emissions, but require further research.Our analysis provides an initial conceptual and empirical framework for subsequent research, which would appear both useful and necessary given the diversity of responses observed for (only) the two different smallholder farm households we analysed. However, it is important to note a number of limitations in our analysis that might be addressed in future studies. First, the optimisation model developed for this study has a relatively simple structure due to limited data availability. Mean values are used to represent most parameters, and variation in costs, prices and production are not considered in the analysis, which omits the potential influences of cross-sectional and inter-annual variation that could be important to assess potential strategies to reduce GHG emissions and their trade-offs. Future work could usefully include the assessment of the influences of variation in these key assumptions. Additional data on farmer risk preferences or the use of a quadratic programming approach (Hazell & Norton 1986) would allow the mapping of a risk-efficient production frontier with and without restrictions on GHG emissions, which would complement and extend the findings of this study. However, this analysis would require data on a range of prices, yields and related emissions that would require substantive resources to obtain. Implicitly, this implies another potentially useful extension of our analysis to include the explicit representation of multiple years, which would also facilitate the representation of tree and livestock production that take place over longer time scales.Second, the opportunities for a reduction in GHG emissions and the effects on income were conditioned on maintaining an assumed minimum recommended consumption of tree products, crops and livestock produced by the household. We assumed this to avoid potential negative (direct) nutritional effects on the household from required reductions in GHG emissionsalthough indirect nutrition, health and educational effects are also possible due to reduced incomes. More sophisticated representations of household demand, as in Bakker et al. (2018) and Wossen et al. (2018), and clearer demarcation of the effects on different dimensions of food security (availability, access and utilisation), as described in Nicholson et al. (2021), would highlight other potentially important tradeoffs between food security and GHG emissions.Importantly, our analysis assesses the effects of reductions based on the characteristics of current (average) production technologies. As noted above, constraining GHG emissions without modifications to system components will lead inevitably to reductions in household welfare as measured by full income. Thus, addition analyses of the feasibility and benefits of new technologies or practices that combine higher yields and lower per-unit GHG emissions would be a key extension of this study. Previous studies (e.g. Bellarby et al. 2014;York & Rymer 2017;Tariq et al. 2018) illustrate the types of methods required and information generated, but analyses are not yet available for the northern Nigerian context, nor do they integrate this knowledge into multiple-product farm optimisation models to assess their fit within specific farming systems. The optimisation model framework we have applied in this study could be extended to include these alternative production practices, allowing the identification of those that best mitigate income-GHG emissions trade-offs. Productivity increases for livestock may be particularly important, given the proportion of GHG emissions arising from enteric fermentation (Ortiz-Gonzalo et al. 2017) and the reductions in animal numbers indicated in our analyses. Alternative complementary technologies, such as biochar cookstoves (Sundberg et al. 2020), may also modify the resource requirements (e.g. for fuelwood) of households and allow reductions in emissions. However, even with the availability of improved technologies, it is possible that income-GHG emissions trade-offs will persist, depending on the emission reductions desired from smallholder farms.Another limitation of our study is the relatively small sample of farms and the limited regional coverage of the empirical analyses. ), diversity in the characteristics of farms within the region make it difficult to generalise our empirical findings about changes to income and production activities, other than the above-noted conclusion that restrictions on GHG emissions will have a negative effect on income. However, the use of representative farm types at the two sites and with different production characteristics provides some initial evidence that effects may be similar for other types of farms within the region studied. In addition to addressing the other limitations discussed above, additional site-specific data collection and analyses are needed to reach generalisable conclusions with regard to the influences of GHG restrictions on household welfare.Above we have highlighted a number of implications for research, including the need for improved model representations, a broader scope of data collection and the further development and evaluation of productivity-enhancing technology with lower GHG emissions per unit of product. In addition, it is relevant to improve the knowledge base on the sources of GHG emissions in smallholder farming systems (as in Ortiz-Gonzalo et al. 2017). This will allow an improved and more site-specific empirical basis for the assessment and mitigation of emissions. Taken together, these knowledge gaps suggest the need for programmatic and policy actions related to the allocation of funds to agriculture research for development (A4RD), both by national systems and the CGIAR.In addition to the implications for knowledge generation, our analysis suggests that reductions in GHG emissions in the absence of changes to production practices would require compensatory payments to smallholder farmers to avoid placing the burden of reducing GHG emissions on the region's smallholder farmers. Although less common in lower-income country settings, payments of this nature mirror those made for environmental services in some higher-income country settings (Ezzine-de-Blas et al. 2016). In practice, such a payments programme would also require both funding support and administrative resources and capacity to be implemented effectively. This may imply that other strategies for national-level GHG reduction could be more cost-effective, even within the agriculture sector. There is likely to be an important role for the development and implementation of improved technologies that reduce total GHG emissions, not just per-unit emissions, given the future growth in production levels necessary to meet the needs of a growing population. If an emissions-reduction effort, a payments programme and/or the dissemination of improved technological options were implemented, this would also require enhanced training and resources for relevant extension personnel, e.g. to provide information on the best means of reducing emissions, receiving payments or integrating new practices into farming systems. For now, we are unaware of substantive policy proposals that would require GHG reductions by smallholders at the study sites, but as efforts to reduce GHG emissions accelerate, the information provided by this and similar studies may take on additional importance.Further, they did not consider the time interval for direct emissions from crop residue N. Respondents in both LGAs utilised small quantities of agro-chemicals, fertiliser and concentrates; as a result, offfarm GHG emissions were excluded from the GHG inventory.A sample calculation value of 0.5 tonnes/ha for agricultural residue biomass burned was used, but it might be zero. Values for mass burnt, which includes CO2, N2O, CH4, NOx and carbon monoxide (CO) was set at 0.01 tonnes DM/ha, with a value of 0.8 adopted as combustion factor (cf) for maize residues. Values for non-CO2 emissions from mass burning and cf were multiplied with the emission factor for the burning of agriculture residues (Gef, i.e. CO2 (1 515), N2O (0.07), CH4 (2.7), NOx (2.5) and CO ( 92)) to obtain estimates of non-CO2 emissions from mass burning of locust bean, camel's foot, sorghum, groundnut and soybean residues for the study sites. The model assumes the conversion of carbon monoxide (CO), which has weak direct global warming potential, while NOx may reduce warming, thus the CO2eq factor was set at zero.Given that the estimated C harvest is greater than the default C production for the tropical dry setting, the Tier 1 method assumes that carbon stock changes are zero and that dead wood and litter stocks present in cropland, agroforestry systems and orchards are at equilibrium. Subsequently, a conservative assumption of no net biomass accumulation for camel's foot and locust bean was adopted. According to Paul et al. (2017), changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks are slow and difficult to estimate, corroborating the findings of Palm et al. (2010) and Powlson et al. (2016). Thus, there was no need to estimate the carbon stock changes and dead organic matter (OM) needs in this system. However, this is contrary to much of what seems to be the case regarding soil organic matter (SOM) content in African contexts (e.g. Tully et al. 2015), which suggests a downward trend. Thus, an assumption of no change in soil carbon is probably overly optimistic.The primary focus of N2O emissions in this study includes direct and indirect emissions from MMS and MS. The amount of manure per hectare used for estimation was obtained from the survey, and IPCC default nitrogen excretion rates were used to multiply with default EFs from the IPCC guidelines. Rates were presented in units of nitrogen excreted per 1 000 kg of animal per day and applied to cows, sheep and goats using a typical average animal mass (TAM). According to the FAO, TAM for developing countries is set at 350 kg for local cows and 20 kg for sheep and goats. It was assumed that over 90% of the manure produced per household was collected, and that all of it was applied to fields for fertilisation. All manure was also assumed to be managed in a solid storage system, but urine was ignored.Other N2O losses considered are direct emissions from NO3, NH3 and N2 in nitrogen (N)-containing inputs such as manure, urine and dung, tree/crop residues and fertiliser in soils. Urine and dung inputs to freely grazed soils were also assumed to be small and thus were excluded from the model. The model assumes no harvest or return of below ground biomass, and only the application of fodder of soybean/locust bean and groundnut/camel's foot for sorghum production in Bunkure and Maigateri respectively. Nitrogen (N) content in a 50 kg bag of NPK fertiliser does not include urea and assumes a diammonium phosphate (DAP) composition for N fertiliser of 0.20 kg N. The study concluded the estimation of N2O emissions using the atmospheric deposition of N volatilised from soils. All emissions were converted to N2O by multiplying the values obtained by 44/28 (IPCC 2006).Extensive production of ruminant livestock, which includes sheep, goats and particularly cows, is used for more than one production purposemilk, meat and draftand results in CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation and MMS. The emission factors for developing countries that were used are 46 kg CH4 head -1 year -1 for mature cows grazing on large areas, and 5 kg CH4 head -1 year -1 for sheep and goats."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4679504399.json b/main/part_2/4679504399.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5883465dd3c6e72324db169226ab534d66cd495 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4679504399.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"845c7f790ad048a020f7c8b424dd748f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/datafile/:persistentId/?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/PH2CCG/FBQPWO","id":"-932092574"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"957e9d6b-fca9-4d5a-9356-ce18dcf586ec","content":"This paper documents the construction process of the 2001 Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) for Kenya, which is a part of IFPRI's analytic support to USAID's Action Plan for Kenya. This SAM is the base for a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of Kenya, which is an extension of the standard CGE modelling framework developed at IFPRI. The SAM disaggregates the entire Kenyan economy into 33 production sectors, of which 15 are agricultural sectors. Several structural and annual data sources such as national accounts, government accounts, balance of payments and foreign trade data, as well as the most recent IO table, SAMs for earlier base years and the 1997 Welfare Monitoring Survey for Kenya were used for the construction of the SAM.The history of Social Accounting Matrices for Kenya goes back to the year 1986.This was the base year for the first Kenya SAM, which was used as an input for a CGE-model in the Ministry of Planning and National Development. In a modified version, this SAM was also used as base for a computable general equilibrium (CGE) -model on Kenya's economy by Jörgen Levin (Levin J. 1998).The for the Kenya SAM.The first step in developing a disaggregated multi-sector (micro) SAM is the construction of a macroeconomic SAM, which captured the aggregated structure of Kenya's economy. The second step is the construction of a disaggregated Micro SAM as an expansion of an existing input-output (IO)-table concluding a series of activities, commodities, factors and institutions. The Macro SAM gives us a set of control totals for macro aggregates such as total gross domestic product (GDP) at factor cost, total imports & exports, total private consumption as well as total government and investment demand. The share of private consumption in GDP at factor costs is 89,5 %, while the share of government consumption is 19,5 % and the investment consumption's share in GDP at factor costs amounts to 14,8 %. Commodities are disaggregated into the same 33 sub-sectors plus accounts that capture transaction costs for exported, imported and domestic commodities respectively. Import and export data was made available by the Customs Department of the Kenyan Ministry of Finance and Planning, Nairobi.The factor classification of the micro-SAM distinguishes four production factors, that is, labour and capital, which divided into agricultural and non-agricultural respectively.The households are disaggregated according to location (rural/urban), gender of head of household and poverty status (ultra-poor, poor or non-poor). Table 3 describes the resulting 12 household categories and their particular share in total households. Although the Macro SAM is balanced, the data used to disaggregate the Micro SAM is from a number of inconsistent sources. This results in a number of imbalances between row and column accounts in the prior Micro SAM, which must be removed in order to arrive at a final balanced 2001 SAM for Kenya. A cross-entropy approach to SAM estimation is used for the balancing process leading from the unbalanced prior to the balanced final SAM. Since data availability and data consistency are limited, the cross-entropy approach is an appropriate tool for estimating a balanced and consistent database starting from an unbalanced database that contains all available information.A SAM can be defined as a matrix T of monetary flows T i, j representing payments by account j to account i. Following the convention of double-entry bookkeeping, total receipts and total expenditures of a particular agent i have to be equal (i.e., respective row and column sums are balanced). This is shown below.Dividing every cell entry of the flow matrix T by its respective column total generates a matrix A of column coefficients:In matrix notation it follows that: y = A y Balancing a SAM is an underdetermined estimation problem using information from various sources and for various years. The cross-entropy approach allows the incorporation of errors in variables, inequality constraints, and prior knowledge about any part of the SAM (as opposed to just row and column sums as in the RAS balancing method). 3 These features of the crossentropy estimation technique allow considerable flexibility in incorporating specific information and implementing limits to which the estimation results are restricted. The general crossentropy approach is described by the following optimization problem. 4 In this equation A is a coefficient matrix representing any prior SAM. Despite being inconsistent and imbalanced, this prior SAM represents the starting point of the balancing process aimed at determining a new and balanced coefficient matrix A*. 5 The described problem is set up to minimize the entropy difference between the two coefficient matrices. This becomes clearer if the optimization problem is rearranged as follows:Additional equality and inequality constraints can be formulated as linear 'adding-up' constraints on various elements of the SAM. For an aggregator matrix G, which has ones for those Micro SAM entries that correspond to a certain Macro SAM aggregate and zeros otherwise, the formulation for k such aggregation constraints is given by where y(k) is the value of the aggregate and the T ij 's are the Micro SAM flows.Measurement errors in variables can be incorporated into the system through where y is a vector of row sums and x the initially known vector of column sums measured with error. The error e is defined as a weighted average of known constants where w is a set of weights W, v are constants, and weights are subject to For the purposes of the Kenyan Micro SAM, a symmetric distribution around zero given lower and upper bounds is generally chosen using five weights. 6 Consequently, the optimization problem of minimizing the entropy difference now contains a term for the weights W, as shown below.Solving the above optimization problem in conjunction with the constraints imposed on the system derives a balanced SAM that is as close to the prior SAM as possible while still satisfying the constraints. By varying the value of the standard errors on the constraints it is possible to adjust the confidence placed on various areas within the prior. For instance, it is possible to lower the standard errors on the macro control constraints so as to ensure a closer match of the Micro SAM's aggregates to those found in national accounts. The remainder of this section outlines the constraints used for the Kenyan SAM."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4704208637.json b/main/part_2/4704208637.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cbd6aeebe317495360b433477676bed369b7c626 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4704208637.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"881b5877aedfa4fc2bd32bd95ac0e8b0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a26c865d-cea4-4f96-b030-dddb40b3a183/retrieve","id":"1253724335"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"14d7cbe0-7b1e-4561-b11a-5dc2440f03a8","content":"A large number of Chinese farmers, extension workers, scientists and policy makers contributed to project R&D activities, with the support of a small cadre of international scientists from CIMMYT and IWMI -to all thanks is due. During their studies students have contributed to the collection, analysis and interpretation of data. Thanks are due to the technicians and support staff who facilitated operations. Finally, the contributions, advice and patience of CPWF managers notably the Theme 1 leader is appreciated.The project goal was to improve the incomes and livelihoods of smallholder farm families in the rainfed cropping areas of Henan, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia and Shandong (Shanxi was added later) while simultaneously improving soil quality and reducing land degradation and soil erosion that threaten system sustainability. Specific objectives included fostering farm family adoption of conservation agriculture practices through participatory research, farmer experimentation and farmer-to-farmer interaction and extension; assessing the (biophysical, social and economic) consequences of conservation agriculture adoption; encouraging a policy environment that does not discriminate against conservation agriculture; and strengthening the capacity of local partners. Project partners include two international Centers (CIMMYT and IWMI), Provincial and County NARES, and Universities. Project beneficiaries were expected to include farm families; downstream water users; researchers and extension workers; and future generations.Each report in the CPWF Project Report series is reviewed by an independent research supervisor and the CPWF Secretariat, under the oversight of the Associate Director. The views expressed in these reports are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food. Reports may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgment. Before taking any action based on the information in this publication, readers are advised to seek expert professional, scientific and technical advice.Citation: PN12 Project team. 2010. Conservation agriculture for the dry-land areas of the Yellow River Basin: Increasing the productivity, sustainability, equity and water use efficiency of dry-land agriculture, while protecting downstream water users. CPWF Project Report submitted to the Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF). It is sometimes forgotten how strongly climate affects cropping system and their potential for improvement, and consequent environmental impacts and poverty reduction. The project characterized 6 first-level cropping systems and 15 second-level sub-cropping systems in the Yellow River Basin (YRB). Related to climate, water scarcity is a key determinant of crop productivity. In the YRB rainfall decreases from the north to the south, and from the northwest to the southeast. The growth of population and industry placed heavy demands on water in the YRB which led to crisis during the 1990s.Conservation agriculture (featuring reduced or zero tillage, mulch retention, crop rotations and cover crops) offers a possible solution. Conservation agriculture (CA) systems typically result in increased crop water availability and agroecosystem productivity, reduced soil erosion, increased soil organic matter and nutrient availability, reduced labor and fuel use and increased biological control of pests. Building on experienced in irrigated areas of China and international experience, the project adapted CA for rainfed areas of the YRB.Project scientists distinguished Full CA (or Real CA) and Partial CA (or Nominal CA) technology packages. Full CA is characterized by adopting both no till (or reduced till) technology with residue retention, and is consistent with the internationally recognized three principles of CA definition. In contrast, Partial CA is characterized by either no till (or reduced till) technology or residue retention technology. Appropriate is crucial to effective CA and the project supported the development and improvement of no-till seeders and other machinery in all Provinces. For example, the 2BM-5X NT seeder is now successful for direct seeding wheat, maize, minor grain crops on wheat, rice or maize residue fields due to a special knife opener introduced by the project.Project scientists showed that CA techniques increased soil moisture (beneficial for crop growth) across a range of environments. CA also reduced maximum soil temperature, with variable effects on crop establishment and growth depending on environment. However, residue retention reduced maize yields because of the lower soil temperatures under the residues. This was especially marked in relatively cold Ningxia Province.Although in the trials CA generally had positive effects on yields, survey results of farmers who have adopted CA report no significant effects of CA on yields. As in other countries, farmers perceive the reduction in production costs from the reduction or elimination of tillage as a major advantage. The project surveys found that adoption of CA technologies significantly reduced farm household poverty by 5 percent.CA contributes to increasing water use efficiency through reduction in soil evaporation and consequently higher soil moisture available to the crop. The project survey found that 71% of villages reported an improvement of their environment following the adoption of CA; and some farmers had observed an increase in water use efficiency.More than 5000 farmers took part in project training courses or field days at the CA demonstrations. Our research results show that Partial CA technology begun to be adopted in the YRB since the early 1980s, but rapid development commenced during the 1990s, and picked up especially since the 2000. In contrast to Partial CA technology, Full CA technology began to be adopted during the late 1990s. Overall, the adoption rates of CA technology (either for partial or full CA technology) are still very low. The adoption rate for Partial CA technology (especially for residue retention) is relatively high. However, the Full (or real) CA (combining reduced till and residue retention together) is limited.Policy and socio-economic factors are important drivers of wider adoption of CA technology. Results show that policy intervention (such as machinery subsidy policy and policy of forbidding burning residue) can play some role in promoting the adoption of CA technology. The project has had some success in influencing policy; for example, a no-till seeder has been put into the list of Agricultural Machinery Purchase Allowance of 40% of purchase price. More than 85 sets of the seeder have been produced and used to no-till plant more than 700 ha in YRB region.The capacity of National, Provincial and County research and extension organizations has been built. Also 4 PhD candidates and 33 Master students have worked on project data. With the implementation of this project, 5 patents relative to CA have been registered. Five international papers and 50 national papers have been published. Two CA techniques got provincial prizes. At same time, the participants from the project organizations won 5 national CA project and 10 provincial CA projects. Senior project scientists took part in high-level policy dialogues at national and provincial levels, and project results were utilized to reorient the five-year plan, including \"CA blueprints\" in national & provincial plans. This is a very important impact in the light of the survey results which showed that resource endowment positively affected CA adoption, and that this could be offset by subsidies on the CA components that increased initial investment -especially no-till machinery.The Yellow River Basin (YRB) is characterized by very high population density and extensive poverty. Soil erosion is also a major problem in the Basin: the river is one of the most sediment laden in the world. Many regions of the YRB are relatively dry and there are large areas of rainfed cropping. Hydrology is a key issue: there was a crisis of water availability and river flow in the 1990s because of the rapidly growing demand from agriculture, domestic and industrial uses. Conservation agriculture (featuring reduced or zero tillage, mulch retention, crop rotations and cover crops) offers a possible solution to these issues. Conservation agriculture systems typically result in increased crop water availability and agroecosystem productivity, reduced soil erosion, increased soil organic matter and nutrient availability, reduced labor and fuel use and increased biological control of pests. Most of the recent advances in conservation agriculture in China have been in irrigated areas, from which technologies and approaches were adapted for this project.The project goal was to improve the incomes and livelihoods of smallholder farm families in the rainfed cropping areas of Henan, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia and Shandong (Shanxi was added later) while simultaneously improving soil quality and reducing land degradation and soil erosion that threaten system sustainability. Specific objectives include fostering farm family adoption of conservation agriculture practices through participatory research, farmer experimentation and farmer-to-farmer interaction and extension; assessing the (biophysical, social and economic) consequences of conservation agriculture adoption; encouraging a policy environment that does not discriminate against conservation agriculture; and strengthening the capacity of local partners. Project partners include two international Centers (CIMMYT and IWMI), Provincial and County NARES, and Universities. Project beneficiaries were expected to include farm families; downstream water users; researchers and extension workers; and future generations.The project brought together scientists, extension workers and policy makers from National, Provincial and County organizations along with scientists from CIMMYT and IWMI to conduct research, extend results to, train and foster adoption of CA among farmers. Experimental sites were identified in five pilot Counties and characterized in terms of soils, climate and cropping history. These provided the platform for the 4-year trials of CA techniques especially tillage and residue management with wheat, maize and cash crops. Minimum data sets of agronomic and soil data were systematically collected at all sites. The results of the experiments were the basis for the establishment of participatory on-farm demonstrations and farmer training in all the Counties. The experimental data were an input to crop modeling of CA technologies using the DSSAT model. Farm household group and individual interview surveys were conducted in 2005 and 2008. Again, participatory research methods were applied to the testing and adaptation of farm equipment especially no-till planters for CA. Impact pathways were identified. Students benefited from supervised analysis and interpretation of project data. Study tours to observe CA in the field and participate in conferences were organized for the project scientists. Policy discussions were arranged at various levels to foster appropriate policy adjustments to support CA adoption,The field experiments were a rich source of data on CA for different cropping systems, soils and climates. Climate affects cropping system and their potential for improvement, and consequent environmental impacts and poverty reduction. The project assembled and analysed detailed meteorological data for the YRB. Rainfall decreases from the north to the south, and from the northwest to the southeast. The growth of population and industry placed heavy demands on water in the YRB which led to crisis during the 1990s, providing an underlying rationale for water-efficient methods such as CA. The project characterized the six first-level cropping systems and 15 second-level sub-cropping systems in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) -see more detail below. Related to climate, water scarcity is a key determinant of crop productivity; but the project experiments showed that low soil temperatures were a binding constraint on crop establishment in the north.Conservation agriculture (featuring reduced or zero tillage, mulch retention, crop rotations and cover crops) offers a possible solution. The project showed that CA techniques affect soil moisture (affecting hydrology and crop growth) and temperature (affecting crop establishment and growth) -see details below --in general strongly. Consequently, it increased agroecosystem productivity (in a majority of experiments). While crop yields were increased significantly, the water and nutrient use efficiency increased by more than 20% for wheat and maize. However, low spring soil temperatures were aggravated by surface residue in the north (Ningxia) and the Full CA (no-tillage with full residue retention) delayed summer crop (maize) establishment, and for this reason farmers preferred plastic to mulch. Specific details are described below.The project supported the development and improvement of no-till seeders and other machinery in all Provinces. For example, the 2BM-5X NT seeder is successful for direct seeding wheat, maize, minor grain crops into fields covered with wheat, rice or maize residues due to a special knife opener. As well as developing equipment for medium sized tractors, the project experimented with some two-wheel tractor equipment. Moreover, the project facilitated the import of three advanced no-till planters (\"Happy Seeders\") from India to Ningxia Province which have been successfully put to work.Policy and socio-economic factors are important drivers of wider adoption of CA technology. Results show that policy intervention (such as machinery subsidy policy and policy of forbidding burning residue) can play some role in promoting the adoption of CA technology. The project has had some success in influencing policy; for example, a no-till seeder has been put into the list of Agricultural Machinery Purchase Allowance of 40% of purchase price. More than 85 sets of the seeder have been produced and used to plant without tillage on more than 700 ha in YRB the region.The capacity of National, Provincial and County research and extension organizations has been built. Also 4 PDFs, 8 PhD candidates and 17 Master students have worked on project data. Five international papers and 50 national papers have been published. Two CA techniques got provincial prizes.More than 5000 farmers took part in project training courses or field days at the CA demonstrations. Our research results show that Partial CA technology begun to be adopted in the YRB since the early 1980s, but rapid development commenced during the 1990s, and picked up especially since the 2000. In contrast to Partial CA technology, Full CA technology began to be adopted during the late 1990s. Overall, the adoption rates of CA technology (either for partial or full CA technology) are still very low. The adoption rate for Partial CA technology (especially for residue retention) is relatively high. However, the Full (or real) CA (combining reduced till and residue retention together) is limited.With the implementation of this project, 5 patents relative to CA have been registered. At same time, the participants from the project organizations won 5 national CA project and 10 provincial CA projects. Senior project scientists took part in high-level policy dialogues at national and provincial levels, and project results were utilized to reorient the five-year plan, including \"CA blueprints\" in national & provincial plans.As well as increasing productivity, CA also reduces soil erosion from wind and water. As in other countries, farmers perceive the reduction in production costs from the reduction or elimination of tillage as a major advantage. For example, CA can reduce the cost of machine service fees, reduce fuel input from 25 to 40 percent, and reduce labor input. The farm surveys found huge reductions in labour use with CA -up to 80% reduction in the maize crop. Similarly, CA increases farmer income, and the project surveys found that adoption of CA technologies can significantly reduce farm household poverty by 5 percent.In relation to environmental impacts, CA contributes to increasing water use efficiency, increasing soil moisture and reducing soil evaporation by about 30 percent. Finally, CA reduces runoff of surface water by about 60 percent. The project survey found that 71% of villages reported an improvement of their environment following the adoption of CA; and some farmers had observed an increase in water use efficiency.The rainfed agricultural areas of the provinces of Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Henan and Shandong share many similarities despite the many differences in climatic factors, cropping patterns, infrastructure, and income levels that also characterize these regions. While part of the targeted region is situated on the highly erodible Loess Plateau, others are on sedimentary deposits. Rainfall varies from approximately 750 mm per year in southeastern Shandong to 200 mm in northern Ningxia. Most of the rainfed agricultural areas are found in zones that receive at least 400 mm of annual rainfall. However, rainfall use efficiency is generally quite low throughout the region. The reasons for poor efficiency vary somewhat with soil type: in the loess areas it is largely due to high evaporation rates from the soil, whereas in the areas of alluvial deposits, low soil water infiltration rates are a major limiting factor, leading also to significant water run-off and soil erosion.Soil erosion has long been recognized as a severe problem in the Yellow River basin. The Yellow River is the most sediment-laden river in the world with most of the sediment originating in the thick loess deposits of Shaanxi and Shanxi Provinces, outside the geographic scope of this project. Nevertheless, soil erosion, both by wind and water, in the basin as a whole removes the most fertile topsoil and compound water and air pollution problems. These processes are particularly marked in the drier and more sloping lands associated with rainfed agriculture.Dryland area accounts for almost 6.6 million hectares or approximately 57% of the cultivated land in the Yellow River Basin (YRB), although definitions of \"dryland\" in China also include areas that have some supplemental irrigation. Using the official poverty definition of per capita income less than US$625 a year, the average incidence of poverty in the YRB overall has been estimated at 11.8%. While official data on poverty incidence in the rainfed areas alone does not exist, research findings suggest an incidence at least 5% higher than the basin average (CCAP unpublished, 2003). Not only are off-farm income opportunities frequently not available to agricultural households in many of the YRB rainfed areas, but crop diversification opportunities are largely limited by agro ecological conditions. Agriculture is generally the predominant source of income for households in this region, and, therefore, successful means of increasing agricultural system productivity and water use efficiency of agriculture will contribute to the improvement of farmer livelihoods.Crop residues cover on the soil surface has numerous advantages: surface soil structure, and therefore water infiltration rate, is maintained and evaporation reduced; drought is mitigated; soil biological activity is increased as there is a permanent substrate for soil fauna and flora; biological pest control is enhanced; and soil organic matter, the motor behind soil physical, chemical and biological fertility, gradually increases over time (e.g. Six et al., 2002). Surface residues also efficiently reduce soil erosion, both by wind, due to the protective cover and wind impedance, and by water, due to the improved infiltration rate and reductions in water run-off velocity. Moreover, the reduction in soil tillage associated with residue retention (optimally zero tillage), reduces labor inputs, benefiting especially women and children, and creates the potential for more diversification possibilities in the farm enterprise.The adoption of conservation agriculture brings benefits not only to the farm family in terms of increased livelihoods, reduced risk, reduced labor requirements and the possibility of the diversification, but also to other members of society. Downstream water users benefit from decreased sediment load in waterways, and more even stream flow when fed by a greater proportion of ground-water and less surface run-off. City dwellers benefit from decreased wind erosion: dust clouds from the more arid western regions have become an important problem in China, reaching as far east as Beijing. Increases in soil organic matter, attributable to the omission of tillage, surface residue retention and increased biological activity, imply the sequestration of carbon in the soil, and a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. A 60-70% reduction in fuel use for crop production, in areas with mechanized traction, further reduces greenhouse gas emission. As agriculture accounts for 20-25% of the worlds CO2 emissions, conservation agriculture can play an important role in the mitigation of global warming.Zero tillage agriculture has already proved viable and profitable to farmers in Shanxi, Hebei, Sichuan and parts of Inner Mongolia, especially in fully or partially irrigated areas.There is little published information from these projects, but correspondence with some of the researchers involved has revealed benefits in water use efficiency, weed control and, in many instances, in crop productivity (J. Tullberg, C. Chang -personal communication).The principles of conservation agriculture, comprising reduced or zero tillage, residue retention and crop rotation, have extremely wide applicability and have been adopted on more than 70 million hectares worldwide. They are used in areas with as low as 200 mm of annual precipitation and with as much as 2500 mm per year; on soils with up to 85% clay and on soils with more than 90% sand. However, even though the principles are widely adapted, the specific techniques and technologies required to apply them are very site specific: some farmers in Brazil even change their management practices between different adjacent fields.The project aimed to extend the use of conservation agriculture to pilot areas in the rainfed cropping areas of the Yellow River basin. The project will promote the development of innovation networks focusing on the efforts and experiences of innovative farmers, farmer experimentation with the proposed technologies, and farmer-to-farmer extension and dissemination. In this way the project proposes to initiate a process of spontaneous adoption, as has happened in regions of small farmers in Brazil, India, Pakistan and Ghana.As conservation agriculture involves a complete change in the agricultural system, and a change away from the paradigm of the plough and aggressive tillage, it is the initial adoption that may be slow and difficult. Once a few innovative farmers have adopted the system, the evident benefits have led to an explosion of adoption in other small-farm areas: in the Indo-Gangetic Plains less than 100 ha in 1997 had grown to 500, 000 ha of zero-tillage wheat in 2003. The expected widespread adoption of conservation agriculture in the rainfed areas of the YRB, in all probability after the end of the project, will attain the project goal of increasing farm family livelihoods through improved productivity, profitability and sustainability of agriculture in these areas, while at the same time reducing the downstream effects of soil degradation, especially soil erosion.The project focused on the areas of five Provinces targeted by the Water and Food Challenge Program that receive, on average, more than 400 mm per year of rainfall.Although conservation agriculture may well prove successful in the drier areas, the project team felt that it will be more advantageous to first adapt conservation agriculture to the \"wetter\" areas, and, once adoption has begun, then concentrate on extending it to the drier areas. The project established sites with two pilot communities in each of the four Provinces (Henan, Shandong, Ningxia and Inner Mongolia), plus additional sites in Shanxi Province. All provinces have rainfed agricultural areas with more than 400 mm/yr rainfall. Aided by Geographic Information Systems and Participatory Rural Appraisal techniques, the project located the eight communities that represented a gradient in rainfall from the nearly 700 mm of Henan to the 400 mm/year areas of southern Inner Mongolia and Ningxia.Contribute to poverty alleviation by improving the livelihoods, system productivity and the sustainability of agricultural production in the poorer rainfed areas of the Yellow river basin. Through the development and dissemination of conservation agriculture management systems to increase rainfall use efficiency, crop and labor productivity, and reduce soil erosion.(1) Foster farm family adoption of conservation agriculture practices based on zero tillage, direct seeding, residue retention and crop rotation in four villages of the Yellow River basin, representing a rainfall gradient.(2) Assess the consequences of the adoption of conservation agriculture practices on system productivity, income, livelihoods, equity, resource quality, water use, and soil erosion at the field, watershed and river basin levels.(3) Encourage the development of a policy environment that does not discriminate against conservation agriculture practices and of input, equipment and rental markets needed to make conservation agriculture practices generally accessible.(4) Strengthen the capacity of local partners to conduct collaborative research and development on conservation agriculture in a partnership mode with multiple stakeholders.This main body of the report begins with an overview of the farming systems of the YRB in the next section, followed by a brief profile of the selected Counties which implemented the research and demonstrations.Because of the spatial and temporal differences in climate, soil type and physiography in the YRB, crops grown and their management vary between regions. In Shandong and Henan, double cropping (two crops per year) of winter wheat and maize is the common practice. Livestock is mainly pigs, poultry and cattle, and farmers earn off-farm income through providing labour to other farms. In Inner Mongolia, Ningxia and Shanxi, the main crops are millet and wheat with one crop per year, and the principal livestock are cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry (Figure 1).The core of the project was based on the field experiments, learning sites and demonstrations in four provinces.According to specific rainfall, geographical feature and dryland faming systems, four counties in four provinces were selected for pilot research and learning sites. Figure2. The annual rainfall amount in the pilot sites and supplementary site Each pilot county was selected through in-depth discussion during the inception workshop.The principal relevant characteristics of the Counties are shown in Table 1 and the location of each shown in Figure 3. After inception, scientists from CAAS, CAU, CAS and Henan, Shandong, Inner Mongolia as well as Ningxia carried out the primary data collection. The data set included the daily temperature, humidity, rainfall, crop species, yield, crop plantation structure, and current status of CA application, especially for the 4 pilot counties. At the end of 2005, experts from CIMMYT, CCAP and CAAS carried out the social and economic investigation in YRB, which data-set include cultivated land, irrigated land, and the sowing area of major crops, crop yield, agricultural production inputs, farmer income, livestock population and other socio-economic relevant data. International and domestic conservation agriculture literature was also reviewed, especially for the target 4 provinces.In the 5 pilot sites, field trials were designed and planned to last 4 years. The trials are described briefly in the following sections which present the main findings for each location.Management of no-tillage conditions.In Shandong, conservation agriculture (CA) based practices have been widely adopted for maize planting in recent years. Maize generally follows wheat, which is harvested using combine harvesters and all the straw left covering the soil. After that, the direct seeding of maize with seed drills is conducted without tillage and with residue retention (Figure 4). Therefore in the following experiments we superimposed the tilled check plot on these fields, and the CA treatments followed on from the previous untilled system and the results reflect effects of no-tillage for longer than the establishment of the trials. In the first season we compared soil conditions in the no tillage plots with the conventionally tilled checks that had been superimposed on the no-till fields. No significant differences in soil porosity and soil bulk density were observed in conservation and conventional tillage conditions.The plant nitrogen content was determined at late growth stages of maize. Also, no significant difference in nitrogen content was found, with plant nitrogen content (0.48% to 0.49%). Likewise, previous no tillage exerts little effect on maize developments and yield component formation.The project endeavoured to validate and use the DSSAT model for the conditions of the project sites. We used the beta version of the new DSSAT-CSM which has been updated with algorithms with handle effects of tillage and residue management on the cropping system. The new DSSAT (version 4.5) cropping system model (CSM) has a modular structure to allow easy replacement or addition of modules. However, the model needed some major modifications to incorporate the treatments used in China, and this was not completed during the project. The following are some of the issues encountered.For few soil properties we used the values suggested by the model because they were not available from the field trials. The model can handle all tillage and residue management operations performed during the field trials. Use of plastic covers is common in China but the DSSAT model does not have a routine for handling plastic mulch. The team tried to modify soil properties such that they mimicked the conditions created by plastic mulch but we have found no reference in the literature to similar adjustments to the model and so are still not confident of the adjustments that we have made to the model. The model is also not capable of simulating the effects of standing stubble. The Inner Mongolia site has two treatments in which they leave standing stubble of two different heights. We are incorporating the effects of standing stubble by simulating the residue into soil rather than leaving on the surface. This way we can simulate the effect of roots of standing stubble and we are testing different amounts of residue until we get a good match with the field trial data. To help us neutralize the effects of variables other than residue cover and tillage, we first calibrate the model for conventional tillage so that everything except residue cover and conservation tillage operations is accounted for in the model. We then used this model and modify it to calibrate for conservation agriculture treatments. We agree however that this method is very questionable and until we are able to modify the model adequately we will not present the results.In this section the principal results are presented for the major challenges under Objective Soil bulk density and soil porosity.After one year of applying the treatments soil bulk density was higher, and soil porosity lower, in the Jimai 20 plots with conservation tillage compared to the conventionally tilled plots (Table 2). We are unable to explain why the bulk density of the soil under Yannong 19 was so much lower than the other two varieties, especially in the 0-20 soil layer. The soil moisture content under CA was lower than that under conventional tillage system. As the wheat grew, the moisture in no-tilled soil showed a lower water loss and higher rainfall water retention. This suggests that the water evaporation rate is lower under no tillage and residue retention conditions.Soil temperature.Between March 30 and May 18, 2006, average soil temperature at 10 cm below the soil surface was 2.0ºC lower in the CA plots than in conventional tillage plots, whereas at 20 cm, the difference was less -the soil under conservation tillage was only 0.6ºC cooler.Soil organic matter content.After only one year, and despite the very high variability, the organic matter content was significantly greater in the CA system at 0-20 cm soil depth, while at 20-40 cm soil depth no significant differences were observed (Table 3). The variations in organic matter content are partially attributed to residue retention under the CA system. There were no significant differences in total nitrogen contents, but alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen was significantly higher in CA plots at 0-20 cm soil depth, while at 20-40 cm soil depth there were no significant differences (Table 3). Wheat population dynamics.There were no differences in establishment between tillage treatments, and plant population was similar across treatments. However, tiller numbers per plant and tillers m -2 were significantly higher under CA: there were 70% more tillers m -2 under CA. So we conclude that the tillering in early winter and early spring is promoted under CA practices, even though germination and plant establishment is not affected.Wheat LAI was measured on twenty plants per plot with a LICOR LI-3000A area meter. Results showed that in variety Jimai 20 (grown under both conventional tillage and CA) LAI under CA conditions was consistently higher than in conventional tillage system, and increased more rapidly as plants grew during the March 20 to May 18 period. At peak LAI (18-27 April) the crop under CA had a LAI of 2.3 whereas under conventional tillage it was only 1.5.There were no significant differences between treatments in relative leaf chlorophyll content (expressed as SPAD value)Dry matter accumulation.The crop was sampled to measure total above-ground dry matter at four times during the season from March 20 to April 28. Aboveground biomass was determined on twenty plants per plot after oven drying at 60°C to a constant weight. In Jimai 20 there were no differences between the tillage treatments at the first three samplings, but at the last sampling date, TDM was 10% higher in the CA treatment.Grain yield and yield components.Yield was measured at maturity by hand harvesting the middle 20 rows of each plot on June 7, 2006. The harvested plants were mechanically threshed and the grain was allowed to air-dry to 13% moisture. The number of heads per square meter and the number of kernels per head were determined from the harvested plant samples. Kernel weight was determined by taking the average weight of 1000 kernels taken randomly from seeds harvested within each plot.As shown in Table 4, the yield of wheat Jimai 20 increased by 20% under no-tillage conditions, due to the significantly higher spike numbers and grain numbers per spikeoffset to some degree by lower kernel weights as would be expected. Under conservation o-tillage practice, the maximum yield was obtained in variety Yannong 19, followed by Yannong 24 and Jimai 20. The two Yanong varieties appear to be well adapted to no-tillage, rainfed conditions. In the conservation tillage system, soil alkali hydolyzable nitrogen and organic matter were higher than in the conventionally tilled treatment, presumably due to the effects of residue retention. Yield of Jimai 20 was considerably (20%) higher in the conservation tillage treatment, and the other two varieties appear well adapted to conservation tillage conditions. In all the 16 genotypes of wheat, photosynthetic rate was steady prior to flowering, and then decreased gradually. Before flowering, higher photosynthetic rates were observed in Yan Blu 6439, Luohan 6, Lainong 0301 and Linhan 51329, while after flowering, higher photosynthetic rate was observed in Lainong L155, Luohan 12 and Aikang 58. However, photosynthetic rate was not correlated in this study with grain yield.The normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) has been correlated with physiological plant parameters and used to evaluate plant growth (Govaerts et al., 2007). At 145-146 DAT for autumn application or 30 DAT for spring application, canopy reflectance was measured using a GreenSeeker Hand-held optical sensor (NTech Industries, Inc., Ukiah, CA, USA). The sensor unit has self-contained illumination in both red and near infrared bands and measures reflectance in the red and near infrared (NIR) regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. This reflectance is used by the sensor to compute NDVI according to the formula NDVI = (NIR-R)/(NIR+R), where NIR is the reflectance of emitted NIR radiation returned from the sensed area, and R is the reflectance of emitted visible red radiation returned from the sensed area. Measurements were taken around mid-day (between 10:00 h and 14:00 h). The sensor was held parallel to the soil, about 50 cm above the crop canopy. In measuring a plot, the trigger was kept down for 4-5 seconds so that 12 single counts were collected. The NDVI values of these counts were then averaged to obtain a mean value for each plot.Figure 5 shows that Shimai 15 and Shijiazhuang 8 have the highest NDVI, Kenong 9204 has the lowest. The NDVI values are very consistent with their grain yield, suggesting that NDVI is significantly correlated with the grain yield and water use efficiency in wheat.Results showed that NDVI values of different wheat genotypes differed significantly at different development stages. Value of wheat NDVI expressed a positive correlation with drought yield index at heading stage. Varieties that had higher NDVI values at heading had better drought yield indices. Under the experimental conditions, Shimai 15, Shijiazhuang 8 and Yan Blu6439 have higher drought yield index than others.The maximum LAI in all the wheat genotypes was observed at flowering, followed by a gradual decrease after flowering. During the period from heading to flowering, Shijiazhuang 8, Shimai 15 and Shimai 12 developed higher LAI than the other 13 varieties.The LAI is highly concordant with the grain yield, which suggests that the LAI during the period from heading to flowering can be used as an important indicator of water use efficiency and yield formation under CA conditions in dry-land.Generally speaking, flag leaf SPAD values in all wheat genotypes increased during the early stages of wheat growth, and then decreased at later stages. The maximum flag leaf SPAD value was found at flowering or early grain filling. During grain filling Shimai 15 had the highest leaf chlorophyll concentrations -significantly higher than all the other varieties except Yannong 21, Kenong 9204 and Shijiazhuang 8.Field experiments were conducted in the 2007/2008 crop season at trial fields of the Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (36′42″ N, 117′ 04″ E). The CA technologies were first adopted in 2004 with wheat/maize rotation system. The soil of the site is a loam, containing 1.22% of organic matter, 13.45 mg kg -1 rapidly available phosphorous, 138.3 mg kg -1 of rapidly available potassium, and 66.9 mg kg -1 of rapidly available nitrogen. The winter wheat variety Jimai 22 was used for experiment.The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with a split plot arrangement. Three treatments -no-tillage with straw cover (NS), tillage plus straw cover (TS), and conventional tillage without straw retention (CT) -were replicated four times on experimental plots 2.8 m wide by 10 m long.For determination of soil moisture, samples were taken from to 0-10 and 10-20 cm horizons. Three soil samples were taken from each plot using steel tubes (5 cm × 10 cm). Soil moisture was measured by the oven-drying method. The samples were weighed wet, dried in a ventilated oven at 105°C for 48 h, and weighed again to determine soil water content. The air-dried soil samples were used to determine the contents of nitrogen and organic matter contents. . NDVI of different genotypes of wheat under CA conditions Subsurface soil temperature (5 cm depth) was measured from seeding to the first node stage at 7:00, 13:00 and 19:00 h daily, using mercury-in-glass thermometers with bent stems. The thermometers were sunk into the inter-row ground to the depths of 5 cm.Soil respiration measurement was performed based on carbon dioxide analyses using an ADC 2250 differential infrared CO 2 gas analyzer (ADC BioScientific Ltd). Shoots were removed by clipping at soil level before measuring soil respiration. Measurements were made by sealing the lid onto the collar and continuously circulating air from the chamber through the ADC 2250 CO 2 analyzer and back into the chamber through the perforated air-dispersion ring on the underside of the lid. The sampling pump had a flow rate of 1 L min -1 , with the CO 2 concentration obtained within 30 s to an accuracy of 1%.As can be seen from Table 5, the soil moisture increased as the soil depth increased. Treatment effects were not consistent. Generally speaking, the 0-20 cm soil moisture under NS conditions tended to have higher moisture content than the CT treatment, but this positive difference was only significant in the March 14, April 14 and May 14 sampling dates. In the early May sampling, there was significantly more soil moisture in the CT plots than in the NS plots in the 0-20 cm layer. The reasons for this are not known. The soil temperature at 5 cm under NS conditions was significantly lower than that under TS and CT conditions (results not shown here). The lower soil temperature under no tillage conditions may be attributed to weak light penetration to soil with higher compaction and residue retention. The reduced absorptions of radiant energy will result in the lower temperature.Under NS conditions, the soil respiration was lower than that under TS and CT conditions, indicating that the release of CO 2 from soil respiration decreased due to the no-tillage and straw cover.A large number of colonies of soil microorganisms were observed on the culture medium. The soil microorganisms, including bacterium, yeast, actinomycetes, and mould, varied with different planting methods. There were a great number of actinomycetes in the soil under NS conditions, while mould abounded in the soil under TS conditions (Table 6). Under CT conditions, only bacterium and yeast were observed in the soil. The species were determined using biochemical reaction approach after isolation and purification of microorganisms. The main species of bacteria are bacillus (Bacteriaceae), Vibrio (Vibrionaceae), staph (Micrococcaceae). Two treatments, no-tillage (CT) plus straw cover and conventional tillage (CT), were designed. Wheat was planted on 25 September, 2007 at a planting rate of 13 kg mu -1 . The trials were fertilized with 37.5 ton ha -1 organic fertilizer (manure), 105 kg N ha -1 applied as urea, 130 kg P ha -1 applied as triple super phosphate and 105 kg K 2 O ha -1 as basal fertilizer at planting and 105 kg N ha -1 top-dressed as urea at the booting stage.For determination of soil moisture, samples were taken from every 10 cm of the top 20 cm depth in planting zone. Three soil samples were taken from each plot using steel tubes (5 cm × 10 cm). Soil moisture was measured by the oven-drying method. The samples were weighed wet, dried in a fan-aided oven set at 105°C for 48 h, and weighed again to determine soil water content. The air-dried soil samples were used to determinate the contents of nitrogen and organic matter contents.Wheat LAI was measured with a LICOR LI-3000A area meter. Wheat DMA of aboveground parts of plants was determined after oven drying at 60°C to a constant weight. Twenty wheat plants per plot were sampled for each measurement.During the period of plant growth and development, the average soil moisture content at all soil depths was slightly, but not significantly, higher in NT planting over CT planting (Table 7). There was no difference in plant population between NT and CT conditions. The number of tillers per plant under NT conditions was 1.3 more than that under CT conditions (5.5 vs 4.2). However, this did not result in more spikes, and there were more spikes m-2 in the CT treatment than in the NT treatment in contrast to Expt. 1 above where there were more spikes in the NT treatment than in the CT treatment. .The results indicate that that NT planting favors the tillering due to the slower drop of temperature in the fall and early winter. While at greening-up stage of wheat, the soil temperature was lower in NT planting than in CT planting due to the residue retention. As a result, the total number of spikes per ha and percentage of ear-bearing tillers were lower under NT conditions, than that under CT conditions.From the grain-filling stage on, the leaf area index (LAI) in wheat under NT conditions was lower than under CT conditions, probably due to the smaller area of the flag leaves and second leaves from the top. However, the LAI decreased more slowly in no-tillage planting than in CT planting after the mid grain-filling stage. These data indicate that under NT planting conditions, the air circulation and light transmission were improved, light reception was increased, leaf senescence was delayed, and the photosynthetic duration for functional leaves was extended.Photosynthetic rate and dry matter accumulation.The photosynthetic rate of flag leaves in winter wheat was higher in NT planting than in CT planting during the period from flowering stage to late grain-filling stage.At early stages of plant growth, no significant difference in dry matter accumulation was observed between NT and CT planting conditions. While after the flowering stage, the dry matter accumulation differed significantly between NT planting and CT planting. These results suggest that the efficiency of assimilation in winter wheat in NT planting is higher than in CT planting. The higher assimilation efficiency in NT planting favors the transfer of organics from vegetative organs to grains, increasing crop yield.At the mid grain-filling stage, no significant difference in the dry weight ratio of spike and total plant was observed between NT planting and CT planting, while as the plant grew, the dry weight ratio of spike and total plant was significantly higher in NT planting over CT planting. During the whole grain-filling stage, the proportion of functional leaves in the entire plant was higher in NT planting than CT planting, indicating that the NT planting could delay the leaf senescence and keep the canopy photosynthesis higher. At early grain-filling stage, the dry weight ratio of straw and whole plant was slight higher in NT planting than in CT planting, contributing the higher lodging-resistance in wheat under NT planting conditions. Whereas at mid and late grain-filling stages, the ratio was lower in wheat in NT planting than in CT planting, which may be due to the more effective transfer of dry matter from stem to grains in NT planting.Although the spike number per unit area was lower, the grains per spike and 1000-kernel weight were significantly higher in NT planting than in CT planting. Ultimately, the grain yield for NT planting was increased by 8.21% as compared to CT planting (Table 8). The research has indicated that the area of flag leaves and second leaves are considerably lower in NT planting than in CT planting, which can improve light transmission in the canopy and air circulation, promoting the border effect and delaying the leaf senescence. Both the individual and population structures of wheat are better in NT planting in dry land. These advantages have effectively increased the grain yield of winter wheat.The results of this research demonstrate that no-tillage planting is very suitable for winter wheat production in dry land.Analysis of the production costs of CA cf conventional systemBased on a long-term trial conducted at Weibei farm (yield results not reported here), production costs were calculated for the conventional and conservation agriculture systems. In the case of Conservation agriculture with wheat/maize rotation, production costs were 11,325 yuan RMB ha -1 . In the case of Conventional intensive cultivation, also with wheat/maize rotation, the production cost was 13,290 yuan RMB ha -1 . In the case of Conventional roto-tillage planting, the production cost amounted to 12,705 yuan RMB ha -1 .According to the estimation of crop yield in 2007, the average wheat yield of CA plots in six demonstration counties including Changyi, Zhangqiu, and Gaoqing was 6735 kg ha -1 with the highest yield of 7677 kg ha -1 . The average yield with CA was 8 percent higher than that of conventional planting. In hill and dry-lands, grain yield of wheat grown under CA conditions was 4455 kg with the highest yield of 5775 kg ha -1 , 23 percent higher than yields with conventional tillage. In the fields of Innovation and Demonstration Projects managed by Shandong Agricultural Machinery, the grain yield reached to 9215 kg ha -1 , 13.7% higher than conventional planting. In dry-lands of Boshan, wheat grain output was 6576 kg ha -1 , 35% higher than conventional planting. Corn mechanical direct sowing can give good plant density, efficient application of fertilizers, good air and light penetration and thriving development, and can avoid damage of the wheat and corn when seeding corn or when harvesting wheat. The corn yield can increase by about 5%.During the past years, the wheat planted using CA technology cropped better than that using conventional planting. The grain yields have significantly increased. This may be attributed to the following: 1) The seeding-machine newly-purchased in 2006 works well and gives good seed placement and seed-soil contact; 2) improved soil moisture because the soil is not disturbed and exposed to the atmosphere, and because residue cover inhibits soil moisture evaporation and increases the ability of the soil to retain water. A measurement made in 14 April, 2007 in dry-lands of Wangguang village in Zhangqiu showed that the water volume that the 0-20 cm topsoil can hold increased by 6.7% after adoption of CA technology.There were more ineffective tillers due to the higher temperature under conventional planting conditions, thus wasting much water and fertilizers. While in fields planted using CA technology with residue retention, the lower soil temperature, slower soil moisture evaporation and deeply applied fertilizers promote the seedling and root growth and productive tiller development. A survey of experimental plots in Zhangqiu showed that the wheat planted using CA technology developed 3-5 more tillers per plant than that using conventional planting technology. Results showed that 1-2 more effective tillers developed in wheat planted using CA technology and nearly no excess growth occurred. Whereas the secondary roots in conventional planted wheat developed poorly due to high soil moisture evaporation during the long turn-around period in corn/wheat rotation planting system, thus leading to the deficiency of water and fertilizers and then affecting the wheat yields.The slower rise of soil temperature due to the stalk covering and higher soil moisture in spring gave a slightly later development of seedlings, and so the wheat escaped the freezing damage by the late spring cold that occurred in 16 March, 2007.The germination of weed seeds is light-dependent. Under CA conditions the stalk covering can effectively block the post-germination growth of weeds. Based on our investigations we have found that the weed numbers in the fields planted using CA technology are less than half those in the fields planted using conventional planting.The soil fertility in fields planted using CA technology is gradually increasing year by year due to the residue retention. In Changyi, Zhangqiu and other counties, the soil fertility in fields planted using CA technology for 2-3 years has significantly enhanced, giving better harvests.The wide row spacing alternating with narrow spacing in wheat fields planted using no-till seeder could improve the air and light penetration into the canopy and favor the development of border row superiority. Additionally, the lower soil temperature and higher soil moisture under CA conditions could prevent senescence, and thus increasing the grains per spike and 1000-kernel weight.Wheat planted using CA technology can develop reasonable crop structure and better air and light availability, with decreased plant height and improved growth. Seeds sown with the wide row spacing are uniformly distributed and develop vigorous roots, more effective tillers, and robust and lodging-resistant seedlings. Lodging occurred frequently in conventionally planted wheat, while this was rarely seen in CA-planted wheat.The production cost can be cut down by 100 yuan when using CA technology and increase income from grain output by 90 yuan, thus giving an additional 190 yuan of net income.The farmers' income increased by 79.61 million yuan in Shandong after the adoption of CA technology in 419 000 plots in 2006. If the area could increase to 30 million mu (2 million ha), the farmers' income should have increased by 5.7×10 9 yuan.Sun Deguang, the owner of the rotary no-till seeder, sowed more than 500 mu of crop in 2005, about 1000 mu in the fall of 2006, having recovered his costs in these two years.According to a survey that each of eight owners of no-till seeders in Changyi planted 700-1000 mu of crop in 2006. Though subsidized and lower rates for seeding requested by the governments, one of the owners could still earn more than 20 RMB yuan from seeding of one mu of wheat, and the average annual incomes for the equipment owners could reach 12,000 yuan. The net income of all machine owners in Shandong totaled 8.38 million yuan in one year.The soil fertility and nutrient components have significantly been improved in CA planting system. The soil organic matter content has increased by 0.05% due to residue retention in double-cropped systems. The soil under CA conditions has a good infiltration of rainfall due to the continuous pore system, and has higher drought-resistance due to large soil moisture storage and residue retention.Under CA conditions, residue retention and stalk covering favor soil conservation, increase soil organic matter, improve aggregate structure of soil and decrease the finely ground particles of soil that are easily eroded by wind. CA can save fuel by 2.47 liter per mu compared to conventional planting. If the adoption of CA technology could increase up to 2 million ha, 74,100 ton of diesel oil would be saved. During one wheat/corn rotation period, 60 m 3 of water would be saved per mu. The irrational extraction of groundwater has greatly diminished.The adoption of CA technology can significantly reduce the production cost and resource inputs. The CA technology is not only adapted to hill and dry-lands but to irrigable lands with high yields as well. Conservation agriculture is a highly efficient management system. Conservation agriculture favors the construction of resource-saving society.Low operating efficiency of corn combine and high charges for harvest considerably increase the production cost. The development of corn combine should be strengthened. The size of current no-till planter used for irrigable lands is the same as used for dry-lands. The row spacing created by the planter is too wide for the dry-land wheat to cover the ridge, causing the waste of light and energy and higher water evaporation rate from soils. No-till planter with variable row spacing should be developed to meet the agriculture needs of lands with different water availability and soil fertilities. Installation of equipment for residue cutting on wheat combines should be encouraged to enhance the quality of corn direct seeding. The time is ripe for comprehensive extension of the CA technology in Shandong. Local governments at all levels the executive branch of agriculture machinery should give more policy support, publicity and promotional events, intensify the efforts on market guides and popularize the revolutionary technology as soon as possible.Sub-soiling, straw cover, reduced tillage and zero tillage were chosen as the main research and demonstration thrusts. The goal was to find a set of best and easy techniques for the farmers: the techniques should be easy to operate, save water, move less soil and be suitable for the local area.We chose Yaowa village for demonstration and established a demonstration field (learning site) of about 20 Chinese mu (more than 1 ha). The treatments were: zero-tillage (with zero till seeder made by \"Nonghaha\"); furrow planting which is widely accepted by the local farmers; and permanent bed-planting. The year of 2007 was a very dry year in the history of Luoyang area. The total rainfall was only 370.2mm, 62% of the average precipitation.The rainfall in Aug-Sep was only 59.2mm, 33% compare to the normal year. The climate was also dry in 2008, e.g., the rainfall between Feb-Mar was only 11.3mm, or 19% of the normal rainfall. Wheat developed only 2-3 tillers (usually 6-7 tillers) and the yield decreased to 60%-80% of the average wheat yield.In 2006, all the cover treatments, including plastic cover and straw cover, improved wheat yield (Table 9). The reason is these treatments improve the ear number m -2 and the grains/ ear. The plastic cover can improve the yielding by 10.4% compare to the CK. The straw cover also can improve 3.9% yielding compare to the check.In 2007, there were few significant differences in yield between treatments (Table 10). However, the treatment with plastic mulch did yield significantly less than the highest yielding treatment -bed planting with straw cover -as early season temperatures were high so that the wheat under plastic cover grew very fast and consumed too much water in the early stages and did not have enough water for grain filling.The beginning of the 2008 season was dry and there was significant moisture stress in all treatments. Wheat yields were very low this season (Table 11) because of this stress and the resultant low spike numbers and grain numbers per spike. In maize in 2006 (Table 12), all of the treatments except the plastic mulch yielded significantly more than the check, with the furrow planted treatment giving the highest yield as a result of having significantly more cobs/ha than all the other treatments. In 2007 (Table 13) all the cover treatments were significantly higher yielding than the check. The bed-planting treatment with straw cover, which improved yield by 26.4% and the plastic cover which improved yield by 24.2% yielded significantly more than the furrow planting and straw cover treatments which significantly more than the check with increases of 17.8% and 17.6% respectively over the check. The 2008 season was very dry and there was not enough moisture for a maize crop. A trial comparing five six tillage systems in a maize-wheat double-crop system was initiated in Luoyang Village in 2006. The trial, arranged in a randomized block design with three replications compared a) Maize (zero till) +Wheat (sub-soiled); b) Maize (zero till) +Wheat (zero till); c) Maize(sub-soiled)+Wheat(sub-soiled); d) Maize (sub-soiled) + Wheat(zero till) e) Maize (zero till) + Wheat (sub-soiled) with residues replaced after sub-soiling and f) the check treatment with both maize and wheat conventionally tilled.In year 2006, sub-soiled and zero till both improved wheat yields: the best system was the Maize (Zero till)-Wheat (Zero till) which gave 6.5% higher wheat yield than the conventionally tilled check. The Maize (Sub-soiled) -Wheat (sub-soiled) treatment improved wheat yield by 5.2%, and Maize (sub-soiled) -Wheat (zero till) improved wheat yield by 5.1%.Maize (sub-soiled)-Wheat (zero till) gave the highest maize yields compared to the other treatments. Maize yield in this treatment was 23.54% higher than the Check, whereas in the Maize (zero till)-Wheat (zero till) maize yields were 14.97% higher than those in the Check.In 2007, there were no significant differences in wheat yields between tillage treatments (Table 14). The 1000 grain weight, ear numbers and numbers of grains per ear were all significantly higher in all the sub-soiled and zero tillage treatments compared to the check. Maize yields in 2007 were, however, significantly greater in all the no-till and sub-soiled treatments than in the check (Table 15). Highest yields were obtained when both crops were sown without tillage (11.4% higher than the check) and when both crops were sub-soiled (10.8% greater than the check). Yield increases arose from a combination of increased ear numbers and grains per ear.The wheat season in 2008 was particularly dry and yields were low as a result of the moisture stress (Table 16). Under these conditions the effect of the no-till and sub-soiling treatments on crop yield were huge: the yield of wheat in the double no-till system (MzWz) was almost double that of the check, and the lowest yielding alternative tillage treatmentwhere straw was replaced after sub-soiling prior to the wheat crop -was 44% higher than the check, and all the no-till and sub-soiled treatments yielded significantly more than the check. These yield increases were largely due to a combination of increased grain numbers per spike and heavier grains, suggesting benefits in soil moisture both before and after flowering in the no-till and sub-soiled treatments. The soil moisture in the various treatments during the 2007 and 2008 wheat season are shown in Figures 6 and 7 respectively. It is evident from these two figures the difference in total soil moisture in the top two meters of soil during most of the early part of the season in 2007. In 2008, soil moisture increased towards the end of the season as the crop was so poor it did not extract all of the moisture available from some late rains. In 2008, the soil moisture content of all 4 kinds of conservation tillage and the straw stalk tillage were higher than the Check, although there were changes between treatments at the different crop stages.This experiment was conducted in 2006 in Songzhuang village. There were five treatments in a randomized block design with three replications: Reduced tillage (one crop a year, wheat), zero tillage (one crop a year, wheat), sub-soiling (one crop a year, wheat), two crops a year, Conventional tillage.In 2006, none of the treatments yielded significantly differently to the check. However, the treatment with wheat in a system with two crops per year yielded the least, and this was significantly less than the treatment with wheat after sub-soiling (Table 17). R: reduced tillage (one crop a year, wheat) Z: zero tillage (one crop a year, wheat) S: sub-soiling (one crop a year, wheat) DC: two crops a year (wheat-maize) C: conventional tillage.The rainfall of Luoyang area usually is enough for one crop a year but not enough for two crops a year (as can be seen in Table 17). In recent years, more and more farmers choose the wheat-maize rotation instead of only planting wheat in a growing season, but the proportion of maize suffering from drought in the early summer is very high, so the farmers in this area have an aphorism \"you can plant maize but you should not hope for any harvest\". We hoped to find another crop for this area to decrease the risk of planting maize. There were some good choices for this area such as millet and sesame. Soybean isn't the best one for this area, but we think the soybean needs less field work than other crops and it is also easier to harvest by machine.We used furrow-planting, zero tillage and bed-planting in farmers' fields for the second year in 2006 following wheat, maize and soybean planted in the field last year. Data on yield and yield components are shown in Tables 18 and 19 for the 2006 and 2007 seasons respectively. In 2006, furrow-planting produced the highest yield in a double-crop system, bed-planting was second, and the lowest was zero-tillage. However, in 2007, the ranking of yields was reversed, with zero tillage resulting in the highest yields -significantly more than both the furrow planting and the wheat on beds. However, the seeding mechanism of the seeder used for the raised bed system did not work properly, resulting in lower plant stands and fewer spikes per unit area.The highest wheat yield was produced in the one-crop system, significantly higher than conventional wheat after maize, suggesting that stored moisture in the soil profile at the start of the wheat season is very important. However, in the 2007 season (Table19) the wheat sown with zero tillage in a double crop system did not yield significantly less than the single crop wheat in a conventionally tilled system.Grain Yield kg ha -1Over CK (%) R Soil temperature was measured by a probe (HIOKI, Japan) and an electric resistance-probe (IEDA) at 8~9 am and 14~15 pm on certain days. Soil temperature was measured each day from planting to seedling and every 2 days from seedling to end of May, every 3 days in June and every 7 days in July.Soil microorganism: Soil sampling was carried out in October 2007 (after harvesting maize). Soil samples from each plot were composed from ten sub-samples which were taken with a probe (5 cm diameter core) and divided into layers of 0-5cm, 5-10cm, 10-20cm, and 20-30 cm. After carefully removing the surface organic materials and fine roots, each mixed soil sample was divided into two parts. One part of the soil sample was air-dried for the estimation of soil chemical properties and the other part was sieved through a 2 mm wide screen and adjusted to 50% of its water holding capacity and then incubated at 25 o C for 2 weeks to permit uniform rewetting and to stabilize the microbial activity after the initial disturbances. Microbial biomass C and biomass N were estimated by fumigation-extraction. Soil enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, and urease) were determined by the method of Wu et al.The soil moisture results showed that July to August is a high consumption period for moisture stored in the soil, because the crop has high water requirement and evaporation due to the high temperatures during this period. There are differences in soil moisture at different stages of crop growth. The steady period of moisture is the first, from seeding to emergence, when the crop requires less water, and differences in soil moisture depend mainly on the treatments. NTS and the control had the lowest soil moisture levels, whereas other treatments retained more water in soil and thus had higher moisture content. From early July to mid-August, water stored in soil dropped to the lowest level. From mid-August, soil moisture recovered since the temperature gradually falls, and the crop's water requirement also decreases. In addition, soil moisture is supplemented by rainfall and the amount of stored soil water increases gradually. Although the soil moisture pattern is the same for all treatments, there are differences between the different treatments and ASRT and NTSM retain more water than the others. CK and NTS had the lowest soil moisture. No tillage and mulching improved and enhanced soil moisture.Soil temperature has a large influence on maize germination, and CA and tillage can have major effects on surface soil temperature. Because the soil surface is covered with straw, it difficult for sunlight to reach the ground directly and soil temperature under CA is lower than under conventional tillage. The no tillage with mulch treatment reduced soil temperature by 1 to 2°C compared with conventional tillage. Under the no tillage treatment, soil moisture content is high and soil heat exchange is not good. The temperature effect is greatest at the soil surface but can be measured all the way down to 60cm.Under the no tillage the soil temperature of the treatment with all straw mulch retained was rather low over the seeding period: around 8-13°C. Low temperature is always a key limiting factor. Diurnal variation in soil temperature in the 0-5 cm layer was affected by different treatments. For all the treatments, the highest diurnal variation in soil temperature occurred in the 0-5 cm layer, which can reach 10-20%. The variation coefficient of soil temperature decreased rapidly in the layers below 5 cm (Figure 8). Soil water infiltration is the process of water entering the soil through all or part of the ground surface. The process is influenced by water supply and the soil capacity for water infiltration, which determines the quantity of water entering soil or lost by runoff. The capacity for soil water infiltration is related to soil texture, soil structure, ground gradient and water content of soil section pane. At the same time, the capacity for soil water infiltration in the field is related to the tillage method. The stabilized infiltration rate (26.4mm/h) with deep tillage (DT) was twice that with light tillage (LT), and 4.1 times more than with no tillage (6.4mm/h). When rainfall lasted 20 and 40 min, deep tillage increased infiltration by 21% and 28%, respectively, compared with light tillage, and increased by 31% and 33%, respectively, compared with no tillage. This typically signals serious soil degradation after several years of farming. Conservation agriculture with mulch cover promotes soil water infiltration and improves soil physical and chemical properties. However, the effect only becomes apparent after quite a long period. The results of our trial show that treatments including whole straw mulch, no tillage with mulch, shallow rotary tillage with mulch, and conventional tillage all affect soil infiltration rate. Initially, the infiltration rate under conventional tillage was the highest, and the rate under no tillage with mulch was the lowest. However, the differences in infiltration rate gradually decreased, which is consistent with the results reported by other researchers. This indicates that conservation agriculture technologies like zero and reduced tillage are useful for improving soil water infiltration.Soil organic carbon, soil total N and soil total phosphorus Tillage had large effects on soil chemical properties. Soil organic carbon (SOC) differed significantly (P>0.05) among tillage systems and soil depths. In the 0 to 5 cm layer, organic matter content increased with decreasing tillage intensity so that it was 43% greater with no tillage, compared to the average of the other tillage treatments. CK and RRT resulted in the lowest organic matter content throughout the 0-20 cm soil layer. Below the 0 to 5 cm layer, organic matter decreased under no tillage, but tended to remain constant in the other treatments. The CK and RRT treatments, compared to no-tillage, incorporate residues into a larger volume of soil and therefore increase the rate of organic matter decomposition and C mineralization (Salinas-Garcia et al., 2002), by increasing the contact between soil microorganisms and crop residues (Henriksen and Breland, 1999).Return of all the residues did not increase SOC throughout the 0-20 cm in all treatments. However, after four years, the effects were extended to the 20-40 cm depth, where ASRT had higher values than other treatments. Below 50 cm, ASRT and NTSM had higher SOC than RT and CK treatments (Table 21). Soil organic carbon stocks have been identified as a good indicator of carbon dynamics under different management systems (Farage et al. 2007). Unlike SOC concentrations, stocks account for changes in both SOC concentrations and bulk density. Comparison of horizon and cumulative carbon stocks among tillage systems showed significant (P>0.05) tillage effect. At 0-20 cm depth, NTSM had significantly (P>0.05) higher horizon stocks than other treatments. Similarly, horizon stocks were higher at 20-40cm under ASRT than other treatments. After 4 years, CT (55. 4 Mg C/ha) and RT (56.4 Mg C/ha) had about 19.5% lower (P>0.05) cumulative carbon stocks at 0-100 cm than ASRT (65.9 Mg C/ha) and NTSM (67.8 Mg C/ha).These remarkable increases in carbon stocks indicate attainable carbon sequestration by converting from conventional tillage to straw return tillage and no tillage systems (Table 22). @ Treatments that share the same letter within the same row (depth) are not significantly different (P<0.05).Aggregate-size and soil organic carbon in aggregates Significant differences due to different tillage systems were observed in all aggregate size classes (>2, 0.25-2 and 0.053-0.25 mm), and in the silt + clay fraction (<0.053 mm).ASRT and NTSM soils had a higher proportion of macroaggregates than microaggregates. Within the macroaggregates of ASRT and NTSM, the 0.25-2 mm fractions were more abundant. RRT and CK significantly reduced macroaggregates in the surface layer (0-20 cm) (Table 23). The effect of tillage systems on soil aggregate stability was evaluated by mean weight diameter (MWD) of aggregates. MWD was significantly (P>0.05) affected by tillage systems in the top 0-20 cm. Average MWD at 0-20cm depth decreased in the order: ASRT (0.84mm)>NTSM (0.80mm)>RRT (0.68mm)>CK (0.61mm) (Figure 9). The increasing trend (CK low stubble with residues cover > high stubble > low stubble > conventional tillage.SOM and N, P, K nutrients CA leads to increases in soil organic matter content from year to year. After four years of CA, soil organic matter content in 0 ~ 20 cm of NHS was higher than CK by 0.12%, NLS by 0.09%, and NH and NL by 0.05%. CA improves soil structure, increases soil moisture, and accelerates mulch decomposition, so that the organic matter content on the soil surface increases significantly.Continuous no-tillage and straw mulch resulted in total nitrogen content in soil increasing year by year. High stubble with residues cover, low stubble with residues cover, high stubble and low stubble treatments all had greater total nitrogen contents than conventional tillage in all years (2006)(2007)(2008) showing that no-tillage and straw mulch can raise the soil total N contents significantly.Different tillage methods affected soil total phosphorus content significantly. The total phosphorus content under conventional tillage was lower in 2006-2007 than in 2005 while in all other treatments the total phosphorus content showed a gradual upward trend. The trend of 2008 was the same as 2007.As the time under CA increased, soil potassium showed a significant increasing trend. At harvest in the third year total soil potassium in the 0-20cm layer was significantly greater than levels at sowing time of the second year. The greatest increase was with high stubble with residue cover, followed by high stubble, low stubble with residues cover and low stubble.Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus changed with soil depth in all growth stages. In all treatments microbial C, N and P levels were highest in the sub-surface (10-20cm) layer followed by surface soil (0-10cm) -microbial C, N and P were lowest in the 20-40cm layer. When measured at three different times, the differences between treatments in levels of microbial C, N and P followed the same pattern: NHS> NLS> NH> NL> T. Within the same treatment, levels also varied over time within the season -grain filling period> seeding period> harvest period.The water and soil erosion quantity was different under different tillage treatments. For example, in 2006 the largest quantity of run-off and soil loss was from the conventional tillage treatments, and the lowest from the high stubble with residue cover treatment. The runoff and soil loss quantity from the conventional tillage treatment was respectively 3.08 times and 2.79 times that of the high stubble with residue cover. The runoff and soil loss from the high stubble treatment were 2.09 times and 1.05 times that of the high stubble with residue cover. The water and soil loss in 2004 and 2005 were similar to that of 2006. Therefore, it is clear that CA significantly reduces the soil and water loss compared with the conventional tillage, while the residue cover can significantly increase the soil and water erosion protection effects.In 2006, the yield of the conventional tillage treatment was the highest in all crops, while the yield of the zero tillage treatment with residue cover was higher than that without cover. In corn, for example, the yield of the conventional treatment was 20.5% higher than that of the yield of the zero tillage with high stubble treatment with residues, and 92.4% higher than the high stubble treatment without residues (Table 27). The yield of the zero tillage with low stubble and residue cover was 60% higher than that of the treatment without residue cover. The yields of millet, soybean, oat and sticky millet (broomcorn millet -Panicum miliaceum) with conventional tillage were 13%, 28%, 12% and 10% higher, respectively, than that of the zero tillage with residue cover. It should be noted however that the land on which this trial was sited had been abandoned due to severe land degradation prior to the trial.In the very dry year of 2007, yield was relatively lower than normal. The yield of the different treatments showed: zero-tillage and mulching>zero-tillage and no mulching>conventional tillage. In 2008, after four years of applying CA, crop yield shows increasing benefits: crop yield in NHS was 33%, 33%, 29%, 27% and 27% higher than the conventional tillage check in maize, oat, soybean, millet and sticky millet, respectively (Table 28); crop yield in NLS was 30%, 27%, 22%, 2q% and 17% higher than the check oat, maize, soybean, millet and sticky millet, respectively; NH increased yield by 10-20% and NL by 10-15% compared to that of traditional tillage. Yield was higher in 2008 mainly because of higher than normal rainfall. A trial was initiated in Pengyang County in September 2006 comparing the conventional tillage practices for winter wheat with no-till treatments with either 15cm or 30cm stubble left standing in the field. The trial was organized in a randomized block with three replications.The Analysis of Variance of the yield results in 2007 showed that there was significant difference between 30 cm stubble treatment and conventional tillage treatment. Keeping 30 cm and 15 cm stubbles increased yield by 16.2% and 12.9%, respectively, compared with traditional tillage (Table 29). However, 1n 2008 after three years of continuous wheat there were no significant differences between treatments (Table 30). In this randomized block trial with three replications established in 2006/2007, an increasingly common practice of laying a strip of white plastic mulch and planting wheat at the side of this strip was compared with winter wheat seeded without the plastic mulch. The results (Table 31) showed that winter wheat with plastic mulch yielded 79% more than in the check without plastic mulch. Analysis showed that net income from seeding of winter wheat with plastic mulch was 80% higher than in the check without mulch, showing that the plastic mulch resulted in greater water use efficiency, especially in a drought year. A winter wheat trial was conducted with no tillage and with plastic mulch in all treatments to compare the effect of stubble height on crop performance in situations with plastic mulch. The three treatments in the trial were with stubble cut at 5cm, 15 cm and 30 cm. Analysis showed that there were significant differences in yield and yield components between treatments, with taller stubble giving greater yields (Table 32). Keeping 30 cm and 15cm stubbles increase yield by 17% and 8%, respectively, compared to the 5cm stubble treatment: yield was directly related to the height of stubble or increase straw quantity.Soil moisture response to stubble height with plastic mulch Soil moisture contents (0-60cm) for the different treatments were measured over the period from October 2006 to June 2007. Soil moisture contents of the different treatments showed an increase in moisture content with increasing stubble height: 30cm and 15cm stubble increased soil moisture content by 16% and 20%, respectively, compared to the 5cm stubble treatment. The effect of stubble treatments on soil moisture could be seen in all soil layers down to 60 cm: in the 0-20cm layer soil moisture was increased by 26%and 31%, respectively in the 30cm and 15cm stubble treatments compared to the 5cm stubble; in the 20-40cm layer soil moisture was increased by 31%and 26%; and in the 40-60cm layer soil moisture was increased by 14%and 3%, respectively in the 30cm and 15cm stubble treatments compared to the 5cm stubble.Analysis of the effects of the different stubble height treatments with plastic mulch on soil temperature showed that there was a significant difference between 15cm and 5cm stubble treatments, but that, inexplicably the treatment with the 30cm. stubble was intermediate (Table 33). Yield was reduced by residue retention due largely to a decrease in plant stand (Table34), although grain weight per ear was also somewhat reduced by residue retention. Thus the principal effect was the effect of the treatments on plant stand. There was, however, more soil moisture at seeding in the plots with residue cover (Table 35) and emergence rates were not different between treatments (Table 36). Soil moisture throughout the season was higher in the plots with residue cover than in the check (Figure 10). However, early growth was much slower in the treatments with straw cover (Table 37). Although the crops with straw cover had caught up to some degree with the check by tasselling, the effect of this reduced growth on ear numbers was already established. Average temperature of different soil layers was measured in different growth stages from 8:00 to 20:00. The soil temperature variation curves are shown in Figure 11 comparing soil temperature effects in the different treatments. Keeping residues on the soil surface reduced soil temperature, and temperature was reduced more with greater quantities of straw mulch. In the seedling stage 1/2 and full straw retention treatments reduced soil temperature by 17% and 26.2% respectively compared with control; while in the jointing stage soil temperatures were reduced by 8.2% and 13.8% by the 1/2 and full straw retention treatments respectively. Similarly at the heading stage soil temperatures of the 1/2 and full straw retention treatments reduced soil temperature by 9.2% and 13.1% respectively compared to the control, but at the harvest differences in soil temperature were smaller: 3.2% and 5.1% lower than the control in the 1/2 and full straw retention treatments respectively. Results showed that treatments with full and 1/2 straw retention reduced yield, although they conserved more moisture. However, the overriding effect of the treatments was on soil temperature which reduced crop growth and resulted in fewer cobs per hectare.The trial was planted in April 2007 with five treatments: 1. Traditional farming (ck): spring plough land (15cm-depth) after rain; harrow and apply plastic mulch, plant maize. 2. 1/2 straw retention: direct seeding (no tillage) 3. Full straw retention: direct seeding (no tillage) 4. 1/2 straw retention: plastic mulch, direct seeding (no tillage) 5. 1/2 straw residue: cover plastic mulch with cultivationThe trial was organized in a randomized block design with three replications. Seedrate was 30kg/. The trial was planted on raised beds with a bed width of 60cm and a furrow width 40cm. Bed height was 5cm and two rows of maize, spaced 40cm apart were planted on each bed with a spacing between plants in the row of 33cm. Plastic strips, laid on the beds, were 60 cm wide and there was a space between plastic strips of 40 cm. The maize was sown on the beds into holes in the plastic.Results showed that there were significant difference between treatments with plastic mulch and those without plastic mulch (Table 38). The treatments without mulch yielded considerably less than the treatments with plastic mulch. Soil temperature differences between different trial treatments Again there were significant difference between treatments with plastic cover and those without plastic -soil temperature without plastic mulch was 4-5 o C below the soil temperature with plastic cover (Table 39), resulting in the large yield differences observed.Table 39. Effect of different treatments on soil temperature. All treatments direct planted.Average Soil Temperature °C # 1. Check -Tilled with plastic 24.9 a 2. 1/2 straw retention: -no plastic, no tillage 20.5 b 3. Full straw retention: -no plastic, no tillage 20.0 b 4. 1/2 straw retention: with plastic mulch, no tillage 25.3 a 5. 1/2 straw residue: cover plastic mulch with cultivation 23.9 a # Treatments that do not share the same letter are significantly different (P<0.01).The previous crop was zero tilled winter wheat. The maize conservation tillage trial was planted in March 2008. The 5 treatments were as follows:1. Traditional tilling (ck): spring plough land (15cm-deepth) after rain. Harrow and apply plastic film, plant maize; 2. Early spring strip tilling only + plastic film; 3. Early spring strip tilling only + plastic film + straw cover (1.5 t/ha); 4. Early spring tilling (almost same as ck, but tilled land in early spring due to a snow in winter) + plastic film; 5. Early spring zero tilling + plastic film + straw covering (1.5 t/ha).The trial used a randomized block design with three replications. The seeding rate was 30kg/ha. The trial was planted on raised beds with a bed width of 60cm and a furrow width 40cm. Two rows of maize, spaced 40cm apart were planted on each bed with a spacing between plants in the row of 33cm.Effect on yield and net benefits.Results showed that, as all treatments had plastic mulch, reduced-tillage treatments significantly increased maize yield y approximately 23%. There were no significant differences between the different reduced tillage treatments but all yielded significantly more than the conventionally tilled check (Table 40). These yield increases led to almost a 40% increase in net benefits with the reduced tillage treatments (Table 41). The trial used a randomized block design with three replications. The seeding rate was 1500kg/ha. Potatoes were planted in alternate narrow and wide rows. The spacing between wide rows was 60cm and the spacing between narrow rows was 40cm. Spacing between plants was 40cm.Impact on yield and yield componentsThe yield results showed that reduced-tillage treatments had significant positive effects on yield, which was increased by over 10% when full tillage was not done (Table 42). All the zero tillage and strip tillage treatments yielded significantly more than the check and there was no effect of plastic mulch on yield. This led to an average increase in net benefits in the reduced tillage treatments of 27% (Table 43). The cost of the plastic mulch has not been included in this analysis, and therefore the treatments without the plastic mulch in fact had even greater net benefits -a lower cost of USD 131.9 and therefore net benefits of USD 1,216, 43% greater than the conventionally tilled check. Develop a Permanent Raised Bed No-Till (PRB-NT) Seeder for no-till planting maize and wheat in the provinces of Shandong, Henan and Ningxia. The seeder suitable for a 50 hp 4-wheel tractor could direct plant maize in chopped wheat straw and direct plant wheat in maize stubble (most maize stalks removed from field), place fertilizer deep and place seeds at the required depth. There was no similar type of seeder in China prior to this project.Develop a Layered Bed Former. To make beds in loosened soil at beginning of PRB-NT system, the bed former would match the PRB-NT seeder for the provinces of Shandong, Henan and Ningxia. Select and improve a Maize/Minor Grain NT SeederObjective 1:To provide no-till seeders and related implement to support the CA trials in Shandong, Henan, Ningxia and Inner-Mongolia.There were two kinds of seeders needed for the project. The first of these was for Permanent Raised Beds with residue covered fields, called the PRB-NT seeder, for Shandong and Henan provinces. Because PRB-NT system was the main research technology of the project, it was a key machine, however, this seeder was not available in China, and indeed in the world, and thus a new development was needed. The second was a machine for working on the flat cropping area of Inner Mongolia and Ningxia provinces. This kind of NT seeder was available, but the performance was not acceptable and improvement was necessary.Objective 2:Cooperating with two private machinery manufacturers in Shandong and Inner-Mongolia to manufacture the proto-type seeders and encouraging the manufacturers to observe and participate in experiments, improving the prototype seeders and raising their production levels, to develop 1-2 prototypes of no-till seeders for CA extension in the dry land area of the 4 provinces.Main Research Thrusts:1)Develop a Permanent Raised Beds No-Till (PRB-NT) Seeder for no-till planting of maize and wheat in the provinces of Shandong, Henan and Ningxia. The seeder matched with 50 hp wheel s could direct plant maize in chopped wheat straw fields and direct plant wheat in fields with maize stubble (maize stalks removed from the field), while placing fertilizer deep and seeds at the required depth. As a seeder with these specifications was not available in China, it was necessary to develop a new machine.2) Develop a Bed Former to make beds in loosened soil at the beginning of the PRB-NT system. The bed former would match the PRB-NT seeder for the provinces of Shandong, Henan and Ningxia.3)Select and improve a Maize/Small Grain NT Seeder for Inner Mongolia. The seeder needed to be adequate for an 18 or 20 hp wheel tractor could direct plant maize or small grains (millet, sesame) into residues, place fertilizer at depth and place seed at the required depth.4) Cooperate with a private farm machine manufacture in Shandong province to develop \"PRB-NT seeder\" and \"Bed Former\", encourage the manufacture to participate in field trials and improve the seeder, and initiate commercial production. Cooperate with a private farm machine manufacture in Inner Mongolia to improve \"maize/small grain NT seeder\", encourage the manufacture to participate in field trials and improve the seeder, and initiate commercial production.According to the requirement of the project to test a PRB-NT system in Shandong and Henan provinces, a bed former was needed to make beds to be able to initiate the PRB-NT system. Agronomists of Shandong and Henan provinces defined the bed spacing, height and top width as 1350mm, 140mm and 950mm, respectively. Due to the wide bed spacing, using one pair of discs would be impossible to form the bed. To solve this problem, several pairs of devices were needed. Besides, if the bed former were mounted on the seeder, it would make the seeder too long to function properly in small fields and with small tractors. On the other hand, the PBR-NT system is not necessary to form beds every year: it only needs to form beds in the first year of system establishment. Therefore, a bed former was designed with 3 pairs of disks and 1 pair of chisels together to dig and move soil four times to form the bed appropriately, followed by the press roller to smooth the top of the bed. The sketch map of the bed former can be seen in Figure 12. The bed former was made in June 2005 in the Qingdao Wannongda Peanut Machinery factory. In the first trial, it was found that it was too light to dig the soil, and the function of the press wheel wasn't good. It was modified to include two aspects: the machine, including the frame, handles of digging devices and linkage parts were strengthened and the press wheel structure was changed from a holistic roller to an assembly of several cylinders.The bed former was used to test reshaping ability before wheat planting in 2006. It was found that, without reshaping, the PRB-NT seeder had poor planting efficiency -specifically the seeds were placed quite shallow or even on top of the ground on both side rows. The bed former, equipped with disks and plows, improved the shape of the beds to help the seeder achieve better planting.According to the agricultural requirement, the seeder should be appropriate for direct seeding of maize into fully chopped wheat straw and direct seeding of wheat into maize stubble (maize stalks removed from the field) in areas with two crops per year. After discussion with project partners in Shandong, Henan and Ningxia, one PRB-NT seeder was designed for a 50 hp (Shanghai-50) tractor. The seeder can plant 6-rows of wheat or 2-rows of maize on each bed. A sketch map of the PBR-NT seeder is shown in Figure 13 and the set-up for planting wheat and maize is shown in Figure 14. The technical difficulties for the seeder included: easy blockage when there were many maize stalks or weeds in the field; need to plant both wheat and maize in PRB-NT; reshaping of beds while planting.• The flat disk (4) was designed to cut the wheat straw and weeds on the bed and to reduce residue blockage.• Opener and Frame: a tine opener was selected to place fertilizer and seed at the same time. Wheat seeding depth is 30mm-50mm, maize seeding depth 40mm-60mm, and the fertilizing depth 80mm-100mm.• There are three beams on the seeder. When planting maize, the openers are installed on the back beam and the cutter devices installed on the middle frame, while when planting wheat, the openers are staggered on the middle and the back beams. Because the seeder needs to plant both wheat and maize, a dual-purpose feed roller for wheat and maize is employed to fit the requirement.• Reshaping device and ground wheel. The bed reshaping device was designed to repair destroyed beds. The deflecting angle is a key parameter for reshaping effect and defined by field tests.• The ground wheels run in the furrows, and drive the seed metering mechanism.• The structure of combined press roller uses compacting wheels to press the sides of the beds if soil is loose after reshaping; press wheels are used to press on the planting zone with gap designed to enable easy passage of the maize stubble when planting. The first field test was done at 24/Jul/2005 and after improving the seeder, the second field test was done at 13/ Sep/2005 and the wheat emergence was good. According to the test results and the project partners' opinions, the seeder was improved in the following aspects: Reshaping devices were reduced from 4 to 2, as the devices were very close to the openers and easily blocked. Also the single drive wheel was changed to two ground wheels to improve the seed metering.Four bed formers and 4 PRB-NT seeders were sent to Shandong, Henan, Ningxia and Beijing respectively. The PBR-NT seeders were used to plant wheat in Shandong and Henan Provinces. Field results showed that seeder performance was good and reached the anticipated goals.The combination press roller had been improved with the diameter of hemisphere of the combination press roller reduced from 450cm to 350cm. So the hemisphere can keep a space with the bed bottom, it ensures the press-wheel can touch the face of seed zone.Other parts of the combination press roller: The thickness of the diameter of the roller was increased from 2.5cm to 4cm to increase pressure.Improvement of the opener: the tine point opener is suitable for making shallow furrows, e.g. less than 5cm. In this case it has good penetration, gives little soil disturbance but the soil disturbance and horizontal force are larger as the furrow depth increased.The improved knife opener is suitable for making deep furrows, up to 10cm. In this case there is no big change in soil disturbance and horizontal force as furrow depth increases, and the opener has additional soil penetration and residue cut through ability.The improved PRB-NT seeder was used to plant maize in fields covered with wheat residue in Beijing in June, 2006. The results showed the knife furrow opener on this machine can reduce the surface soil disturbance and fuel consumption. While in Beijing direct seeding maize into wheat residues was a success (because the wheat sown with two wide rows left for maize planting) but in some other conditions, where wider spacing wheat rows kept for planting maize are not kept, or where there are heavy weed populations on the bed, direct seeding of maize with this machine would be a problem.The improved PRB-NT seeder was used to plant wheat into fields with chopped maize residues in Oct. 2006 in Beijing. Even with the chopped residues there were some residue blockage problems because of the very heavy maize residue levels, but the seeder worked adequately and completed planting on time. The emergence of wheat seedlings was acceptable.At the beginning of 2008, the project team discussed the feasibility of adopting the power driven rotary blades to cut through residue and so increase the \"anti-blockage\" ability of the PRB-NT seeder. It is clear from 2 years of experimenting that the existing PRB-NT seeder could not plant wheat into beds covered with maize stalks. Also from two years research, a big problem was found in machinery system of PRB-NT: the tractor rear wheel axle width (< 1.5 meters) is less than that of all the grain combines (> 1.8 meters).Because of this any width of bed will be damaged by the combine wheel, or by tractor wheels: therefore the PRB-NT system is not yet ready for extension in Central China.However to test whether the power driven mechanism can increase the anti-blockage ability enough to complete direct seeding of wheat into full maize residue covered beds it was decided to design a prototype model focusing on the anti-blockage results without worrying at this stage about wheel damage to the beds.A diagram of the planting pattern of the new seeder matching with a 60hp tractor and which will plant 7 rows of wheat or 2 rows of maize is shown in Figure 15 and the principal characteristics are shown in Table 44. 45.The maize/small grain no-till seeder The 2BM-5 no-till seeder was selected for Inner Mongolia and designed to be able to plant maize and small grains into straw mulch. Common tractor power is around 20 hp. However, the initial version gave poor results and was too fragile, and therefore improvement was necessary.The main improvements carried out were as follows: a) The opener was changed from a narrow point type to a knife type, which gave it more cutting ability to cut residue and break through hard soil, and so be able to work in maize and rice fields with residues; b) the press wheel changed from a single unit model to individual units for each row to better follow the uneven upland terrain in Inner Mongolia; and c) the driving device was changed from the press wheel to a ground wheel to reduce slip and obtain more even seed distribution.Deli New Technical-Equipment manufactory in Huhehot was selected as the manufacturer. Two units of the 2BM-5A no-till maize/small grain seeder were manufactured based on the improved plans. A Conservation Tillage conference was held in Huhehot on 18 Apr. 2006, and the experts and technicians that took part in the conference visited the machine exhibition. The 2BM-5A seeder was exhibited, and many visitors were interested in the no-till seeder.The 2BM-5A NT seeder was tested in plots covered with maize stubble and with 15~25cm high standing maize stubble and 50cm row spacing in Inner Mongolia in April 2006. The test result showed the depth and seed and fertilizer metering could satisfy the expected agricultural requirements. The seeder was also used to plant wheat in Inner-Mongolia and Ningxia provinces, and 20 ha of NT wheat were planted in Pengyang of Ningxia. Furthermore, and as spin-off from the project, a trial of NT planted wheat into rice residues in the Yellow river irrigation area was successful and showed good performance of the knife opener to cut through the rice residue as well forming a perfect seedbed.The function of the seeder was amplified to include no-till planting of wheat and so it can plant maize, small grains and wheat. In accordance with this the name of the machine was changed to 2BM-5X. Secondly, the drive wheel was moved to the back of the seeder from the middle to avoid the greater slippage and the blockage between the wheel and openers when no-till planting maize in fields covered with maize residue. After improvement, the seeder slippage was decreased and the performance improved (Figure 16). Third, the no-till seeder was improved with a much stronger frame and better precision in the manufacture. A total of 35 units of the 2BM-5X seeder were manufactured in 2007 and more than 50 units manufactured in 2008. The principal characteristics of the seeder are shown in Table 46.The 2BM-5X NT seeder was used to no-till plant maize, spring wheat and winter wheat in Inner-Mongolia, Ningxia and Shanxi. When used to plant spring wheat in Inner-Mongolia in May and to plant winter wheat in fields covered with rice residue in Ningxia in October, the results showed that the seeder performance is good and the knife opener can reduce the surface soil disturbance. In direct seeding of maize, the 2BM-5X NT seeder performance was acceptable, but in some cases maize germination was poor due to insufficient pressure from the press wheel. Within each province, we selected two counties that had CA CPWF project activities. Within each county, we randomly selected a set of villages and households. One set of villages was drawn from villages that were being targeted for the extension of CA projects. A list of these villages was provided to the authors by the agricultural department of each county. The other set of villages was drawn from the remaining villages in the county (i.e., those with no known participation in a formal CA extension project-though in some cases there were local extension agents promoting different variants of CA technology). The CA demonstration projects and extension efforts were almost all funded by either the central or regional government, or some international organization (such as a CGIAR center) and carried out by local extension agronomists and professors from local agricultural universities. Our sample villages were randomly selected in parts of China where, according to many key informants (including agronomists and other agricultural scientists), CA technology had the best chance of being adopted. Finally, within the sample villages, a minimum of five households were randomly selected and surveyed. In the villages that had CA projects, the sample households included both households participating in CA extension projects and non-participating households.Within each sample village, two surveys were carried out. The first was a village-level survey with key village leader informants. The village survey gathered general information about the village (e.g., demographics, per capita income, infrastructure, land use, the main cropping rotations, crop productivity and major village income sources), as well as specific information related to the adoption (or lack thereof) of CA technology. Questions were asked about machinery availability and use, the importance of livestock, residue use, soil information and government subsidies. Detailed information was recorded on the nature of the CA technology extension program (if there was one). The second part of the survey targeted sample households in the sample villages. The household survey enumerators gathered detailed information on each household's demographic structure, employment history, and asset base, and on the income stream of family members.We also recorded data on a plot by plot basis on farmers' production efforts. For households that had not adopted any CA technology, two plots were randomly selected from the set of plots planted to crops that accounted for the largest share of the household's cropping activities. For those households that had adopted CA technology, one plot planted under CA technology was selected, and one without CA technology. Wherever possible, we tried to select the second plot to be planted to the same crop that was being cultivated with CA technology. For all plots, enumerators asked farmers to recount detailed information regarding inputs (e.g., fertilizer and labor input) and outputs (e.g., yields) as well as plot characteristics (e.g., distance from the household and plot quality).In 2008, CCAP conducted the second round of field surveys in the Yellow River Basin. In this survey, we focused mainly on wheat producing regions in the Yellow River Basin. Since there are no wheat producing areas in Inner Mongolia, we did not visit the villages there, only in the three other provinces (Ningxia, Henan and Shandong). In this survey, we tried to revisit the same villages as in our 2005 baseline sample; we also added new villages that were not included in the baseline survey. Unlike 2005, the survey team did not select villages randomly, but instead selected those villages where some farmers had adopted CA. These villages have been influenced both directly and indirectly by our project. We selected both rainfed and irrigated villages, for a total of 14 villages in three provinces.In each village, 12 farmers were selected to attend our focus group discussion. When selecting farmers, based on their per capita income, we divided the farmers into three groups: poor farmers whose income was lower than the village average, normal farmers whose income was equal to village average and rich farmers whose income was higher than the average income of the village. We also randomly selected four farmers from each group of farmers to attend our discussion. Besides considering income levels, we also tried to strike a balance between female and male farmers.For the focus group survey, we designed semi-structured questionnaires together with CIMMYT scientists. The questionnaires included the following: village characteristics, farm size, household characteristics, resource endowments, land use, production goals and market access; wheat production systems characteristics (rotations, implements used, residue management practices, yields and input and output prices); CA adoption status, implementation levels and characteristics; advantages and disadvantages of CA adoption; environmental benefits and constraints to CA adoption.To gain a better understanding of the determinants of CA technology adoption, it was necessary to conduct a multivariate analysis to separate the influence of each factor. Applying 2005 field survey data, we constructed the following econometric model to explain the determinants of CA adoption measured at the village level:where yik represents CA adoption in village k in year i. It is a dummy variable: if the village adopts any type of CA technology (either Full or Partial), yik = 1; otherwise, yik = 0. The rest of the variables explain adoption of CA technology. The vector of Sik represents a set of socio-economic variables, measured by the share of the family's labor working off-farm; per capita cultivated land area; share of cultivated land that is irrigated; and the distance from the household to the township.We also included two policy variables (Pik). The first variable measures whether or not there is an active subsidy policy in the village that encourages the purchase of machinery (which is equal to 1 if village farmers can obtain the subsidy, and 0 otherwise). The other policy variable measures if there is a local regulation that is being implemented that bans the burning crop residue (measured as 1 if village leaders know there is such a policy, and 0 otherwise).Finally, we included a variable to measure the extent of the government's effort to promote CA technology. Specifically, the variable (Iik) measures the influence of whether there was a CA technology extension project in the village or not. This variable is measured as a dummy variable. If there was an extension project in the village at some time in the past (or currently), the variable is equal to 1; otherwise, it is zero. The symbols α , β , γ , δ and φ are parameters to be estimated, and jk ε is the error term assumed to be uncorrelated with the other explanatory variables in the model.To understand why some households adopt CA technology and others do not, we constructed the following econometric model at the household level:where Tj represents adoption of CA technology by household j. In our analysis, this is a dummy variable which is set equal to 1, if the household adopts any kind of CA technology (either Full or Partial); otherwise, Tj = 0. The rest of the variables explain CA adoption at the household level (and in many cases are similar to those used in equation 1). The vector, Hj, represents household socio-economic characteristics that affect adoption. Most importantly, we included two household variables that measure the family's labor (share of family members in the off-farm sector) and land endowments (per capita cultivated landholdings). We also included other variables as controls (e.g., age and education of household head). A wealth variable (measured as the value of the family's housing assets) was included as a control for whether or not the household was facing a liquidity constraint. In addition, we also controlled the possible influence of soil type on CA adoption, measured by the share of loam plots and share of clay plots on the farm.In addition to household-specific variables, we included a number of policy and extension variables. The variable (Pj) is a variable that measures whether or not the household knows there is a residue burning ban. If the respondent knows about this policy, Pj =1; otherwise, Pj =0. In addition, we included a variable, Ij, to measure the influence of whether there is a CA technology extension project in the village or not. If the household has participated in a CA extension project, Ij =1; otherwise, Ij =0. The symbols ε , ϕ , η and ς are parameters to be estimated and j ω is the error term assumed to be uncorrelated with the other explanatory variables in the model.To explore the impacts of CA adoption on agricultural production (crop yield, labor and machine input), poverty and the environment, we not only performed literature reviews and applied our field survey data, but also used descriptive statistics and conducted econometric analysis. The following econometric model has been constructed to understand the impacts of CA adoption on crop yields:where y ijk represents wheat or maize crop yields in village k, household j and plot i. In the model, we specified crop yields (kg/ha) as the log term. The rest of the variables are those variables that explain crop yields.The vector of T ijk is of our variable of interest, representing adoption of CA technology. For this set of variables, we had two options. The first option is to treat CA adoption as one variable; farmers may adopt any kind of CA technology (reduced till or residue retention separately or together). If farmers adopt any kind of CA technology, T ijk = 1; otherwise, T ijk = 0. The second option is to treat T ijk as three variables. The first variable refers to reduced till adoption; if adopted, it equals 1, otherwise it equals 0. The second variable refers to adoption of residue retention; if adopted, it equals 1, otherwise, it equals 0. The third variable refers to adopting reduced till and residue retention together; if adopted, it equals 1, otherwise, it equals 0.In addition to the CA adoption variable, we also included many other variables to control the influence of other variables on crop yields. The vector of I ijk represents a set of production input variables measured by fertilizer cost per hectare, labor use per hectare, machine cost per hectare and value of other inputs per hectare. We transferred them into log term. The vector of H ijk represents a set of household characteristics, measured by the age of household head (and its square term) and education of the household head. The vector of O ijk represents a set of plot characteristics. First, we included variables that reflect the influence of soil quality, as two dummy variables: one to measure if plot quality is the best in the village; if it is, O ijk = 1, otherwise, O ijk = 0. The other variable measures if plot quality is good in the village; if it is, O ijk = 1, otherwise, O ijk = 0. Second, the variable distance from home has also been included as a variable representing plot characteristics. The vector of Z ijk represents other control variables, such as production shocks measured by yield reduction due to production shocks, years of adopting conservation technology, whether planting in one season (if one season, it is set to 1, otherwise, 0), dummy for use of plastic mulch and village dummy. The symbols α , β , γ , δ , φ and µ are parameters to be estimated, and the error term ijk ε is assumed not to be correlated with the other explanatory variables in the model.To understand the impact of CA adoption on labor input, we have specified the following econometric model:where L ijk represents labor input (total working days in the growth period) for wheat or maize production in village k, household j and plot i. The rest of the variables are those variables that explain crop yields. The vector of T ijk represents CA adoption, which is similar to that in equation 3.1. The vector of P ijk represents one vector of variables that measure the price of both product and input, such as the price of wheat (or maize), price of labor, seed, fertilizer and machine service. In this model, we also included H ijk and O ijk to represent household and plot characteristics that have similar specifications as that in equation 3.1. For the other control variables of Z ijk , unlike in equation 3.1, we did not include the dummy variable use of plastic mulch; instead, we included the opportunity cost of farm labor measured by the share of labor doing off-farm work; the other three control variables in the vector of Z ijk are similar to equation 3.1.To gain an understanding of the impact of CA adoption on poverty, we built the following econometric model:where V jk represents the poverty status of household j in village k. This is a dummy variable; if the per capita income in the household is below the extreme national poverty line, we consider the household to be poor, i.e., the variable V jk is set to 1, otherwise, it equals zero. The rest of the variables are those variables that explain crop yields. The vector of T ijk represents CA adoption. In this model, we only treated this variable to be one; if farmers adopt any kind of CA technology, it equals to 1, otherwise, it equals zero. The vectors of H ijk and O ijk represent household and plot characteristics. The specifications of household variables are similar to those in equation 3.1. In this model, we included more variables to measure plot characteristics such as land area, number of plots, share of plots with irrigation, share of simple plots, share of loam plots, share of clay plots, share of first-class plots and share of saline soil plots. For the other control variables of Z ijk , unlike in equation 2.1, we did not include a dummy variable for use of plastic mulch; instead we included the opportunity cost of farm labor measured by the share of labor doing off-farm work; the other three control variables in the vector of Z ijk , they are similar to equation 3.1. The development and promotion of suitable equipment received attention and a handful of major machinery manufacturers, collaborating with scientists and engineers, began to adapt and sell zero and reduced till equipment with substantial subsidies from national and provincial governments. As a result of such demonstration activities and strong policy support, it is estimated that by the end of 2007 the CA adoption area in China reached 2.16 million ha. Demonstration Provinces included Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Shandong, Henan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang Provinces. Development of CA in the Yellow River Basin is similar to the national trend. The first year of CA adoption in the YRB was probably 1992 in Linfeng and Shouyang counties of Shanxi Province. Until now, as shown in Figure 17, the CA adoption areas in Inner Mongolia are the highest, reaching 539,000 ha 1 . However, in Gansu Province, the adoption area is only 19,000 ha, the lowest in all provinces. For other provinces, CA adoption areas range from 20,000 to 372,000 ha (Zhao and Xu, 2006; http://www.sxnj.org.cn/zyxx/06sxbhx.doc). We also examined the adoption rate by share of sown areas adopting CA. Results show that based on the adoption rate, CA adoption in Shanxi Province is the highest, reaching 9.7% in 2006. The lowest CA adoption is in Henan, reaching only 0.4%.In the following discussion we seek to track the adoption of CA technology in the Yellow River Basin using two sets of measures derived from our survey data. First, we use a village-level measure. According to this measure, a village is considered to have adopted CA technology (either Full or Partial) if at least one plot of one farm in the village uses the technology. While this does not mean that all, or even most, farmers in a village are using a given technology, information on how many villages have at least one farmer using a technology provides an understanding of how spatially pervasive a practice has become. It also provides a convenient way to track the dissemination of each technology over time. The second measure, percentage of sown area on which a new technology is being used, is a measure of the actual extent of adoption at the farm level.According to our survey, using the village-level measure of CA technology adoption, Partial CA technology expanded from the late 1990s to the early 2000s. In the 1980s, adoption rates of reduced till and residue retention (by themselves) were both low (Figure 18). On average, only 2% of villages had any farmers that practiced reduced tillage. In 4% of villages there was at least one farmer that had adopted some form of residue retention technology. Moreover, during the 1980s the rise in the share of villages in which a farmer was adopting reduced till/residue technology was almost zero. Adoption of residue retention, which grew slowly in the early 1990s, accelerated after the mid-1990s. Although adoption rates of reduced till started more slowly, farmers began to adopt reduced till in the late 1990s. By the last year of our data collection, there was at least one farmer using residue retention in 40% of our sample villages, and in more than 25% of the sample villages, at least one farmer was practicing reduced till.The adoption path of Full CA technology differs somewhat from that of Partial CA technology (Figure 18). In fact, from the early 1980s to the late 1990s, there was not even one farmer in one village who had adopted Full CA technology. In the late 1990s, the share of villages rose slightly, to 2% of villages. After 2001, however, adoption of Full CA technology (at least one household in each sample village) rose gradually. From 2000 to 2005, the share of villages adopting Full CA technology increased to 16%. Differences across provinces. Although adoption rates using village-level measures were fairly low across our whole sample (at least until the last years of our study), we did observe differences among provinces in the adoption paths of CA technology. For example, in 92% of villages in Henan Province at least one farmer used residue retention technology in 2005. In contrast, farmers in only 17% of villages in the Ningxia Province sample villages used this technology. Adoption of residue retention in Shandong and Inner Mongolia Provinces were intermediate.There are also variations among provinces in adoption levels of reduced till in 2005 (Table 47): In 62% of villages in Inner Mongolia, at least one household adopted reduced till technology. However, reduced till could only be found in 8% of villages in Ningxia Province and in no villages of Shandong Province.In the case of adoption of Full CA technology using the village-level measure, there were also differences across the sample provinces. In 39% of villages in Inner Mongolia, at least one farmer adopted Full CA technology. The levels were lower in Henan (16%) and Shandong (17%). Strikingly, no villages among all the sample villages in Ningxia Provinces adopted Full CA technology-despite government efforts to promote the technology.The most striking findings of our adoption analysis were revealed when using household-level measures of CA adoption. When measuring the share of total area within the sample villages that is devoted to CA technology, we found that, in fact, while Full CA technology adoption level was low (3%), Partial CA technology adoption reached 31% in 2005. It should be noted that these adoption levels need to be kept in context, i.e., they occurred in areas where the government is actively extending the technology. We believe if one were to do a wider, fully random sample of villages, adoption levels of Full CA technology would almost certainly be lower. Hence, at least in 2005 in our study areas, adoption rates of Full CA technology-or the most comprehensive set of practices that are consistent with the Blue Revolution technology package-were very low.According to the field survey conducted in three provinces of the Yellow River Basin in 2008, when CA adoption was assessed by crop (wheat and maize), the adoption rate of Full CA was higher than our findings in 2005 which studied CA adoption by plot. For example, the average adoption rate of Full CA for wheat in three provinces increased from 25% to 35% (Table 47). For the Full CA, the most important technology is reduced tillage with crushed residue cover. The adoption rate for the other two CA component technologies was almost zero. The Full CA technologies were adopted mainly by farmers in Shandong and Henan Provinces; in Ningxia Province, the adoption rate was very low. Compared with Full CA, the adoption rate of Partial CA was much lower, less than 1% in 2008. The CA adoption rate was higher for the maize crop. In both 2005 and 2008, the share of sown area adopting Full CA for maize was more than 71%, mainly in Henan and Shandong Provinces. The main type of Full CA technology for maize is zero tillage with complete residue cover. Similarly, the adoption rate of Partial CA (mainly zero tillage) is much lower than that of Full CA technology. To meet the goal of identifying factors associated with CA technology adoption, in this section we will first look at cross tabulations between measures of CA technology adoption and a set of socio-economic factors that define the nature of China's villages and the farmers who live there. We will also attempt to determine whether policy and extension/research projects' efforts to provide information to producers about the benefits of CA technology are correlated with adoption rates. Some of the most distinctive characteristics of producers who adopt CA technologies compared to those who do not are access to household labor and land resources. Results show that in villages adopting CA technology, the share of the labor force that works off-farm (33%) is higher than in villages without CA technology (24%) (Table 48). Therefore, according to our data, if farmers have better off-farm opportunities, they appear to be more interested in adopting CA technology. Within China, our descriptive data suggest that those villages that have more of their labor force in the off-farm sector have an higher opportunity cost for labor, and are more interested in the labor-saving benefits of CA technology.Our survey data also indicate that farmers in villages that have more land are more likely to adopt CA technology. Our data suggest that when land is less dear, farmers are relatively more interested in adopting CA technology, even though there may be a yield penalty (or at least no yield gain) in the short run. Hence, in the case of labor (assuming more off-farm labor means higher opportunity cost for on-farm work) and land (assuming less land means land is scarcer and the implicit returns to land-or the rent-are higher), the value of factor endowments appear to affect the interest in CA technology of farmers living in China's villages.Beyond factor endowments, access to policy support may also influence the adoption of technologies (CIMMYT 1993;FAO, 2001). Before investing in any soil or water conservation practice (or any new technologies), farmers have to be convinced that the benefits will be greater than the costs (given constant risk), and farmers often have to overcome some type of constraint (Ervin and Ervin, 1982;Reardon and Vosti, 1995;Clay et al., 2002).Because these uncertainties and constraints may mean that farmers do not see immediate gain from the technology, government support policies (for financial aid and infrastructure construction) are often associated with successful CA adoption (Reardon and Vosti 1997;Malla 1999;Sanders and Cahill 1999;Bekele 2003). Specifically, when the government provides subsidies or loans to encourage adoption, we would expect to see more adoption.The data from our study sites, in fact, do show this. When examining the data on village-level measures of adoption, we see that if the government provides subsidies for machinery used for developing CA technology, the probability of a farmer in a village adopting CA technology is higher. Results also show that if the cost of replacing existing machines is relatively low, it is easier to extend CA technology in the field.Policies can also create barriers. For example, because of concerns about air pollution, many localities in China (and elsewhere in the world) are taking steps to prohibit the burning of agricultural residue. If farmers cannot burn residue, they have to spend money to haul it away and dispose of it; the cost of technologies that do not require removing residues would then be lower. In fact, our data show that in villages where the government does not allow farmers to burn crop residue in the field, CA adoption occurs at a higher rate.Finally, having access to information on the attributes of the new technology and how to use it in the field should also improve the likelihood of adoption. Therefore, we can expect areas with access to extension agents promoting CA technology to adopt the technology at higher rates. According to our data, in villages where farmers were using CA technology, there was a relatively good opportunity for farmers to access information about the cost and benefits of CA technology (33% of adopting villages). In contrast, in villages that did not adopt any kind of CA technology, only 6% of farmers had had any opportunity to participate in a CA technology extension project.Similar results are found when looking at the household-level measures of technology adoption (Table 49). For example, if the household has more family members working off the farm, the probability of the household adopting some type of CA technology is higher. Households with more land also seem relatively more willing to adopt CA technology. Hence, in our household descriptive statistics, as in the village-level descriptive statistics, there is evidence that the scarcity of factor endowments plays an important role in encouraging technology adoption. Interestingly, Lin (1992), in a paper on hybrid rice adoption, found similar results in his sample of Hunan farmers.Our household level data also suggest that policy and extension can play a role in encouraging adoption. First, households with less wealth, adopt less. This could mean there is a wealth constraint, since CA technology does involve some potential yield loss and investing in new machinery. Therefore, it is not surprising that results of our village-level descriptive statistics found that government subsidy policies helped encourage CA adoption.In addition, although adoption rates are relatively low, there are still differences between farmers in regions affected by different government regulations and between farmers who have differential access to government extension programs. For example, in the case of households that adopted CA technology, 31% of them stated that they lived in villages in which the government does not allow burning of crop residues, but only 19% of non-adopters lived in such localities. The importance of extension efforts is also evidenced by the fact that 39% of households that had adopted some type of CA technology had at some point in the past participated in an extension training program on CA technology, whereas only 6% of non-adopting households had done so.During estimation, we tried several different specifications for both the village-level (equation 2.1) (Table 50) and household-level models (equation 2.2) (Table 51). Since there may be a correlation between the error terms and the key right hand side explanatory variables, we used a fixed effect approach to control for all unobserved non-time varying factors. There may also be multicollinearity between several of our key policy variables. For example, it could be that in places where government bans the burning of crop residue, it also gives subsidies to farmers for purchasing machinery. The same is true in areas that have promoted CA technology (perhaps the same areas that provide machinery subsidies or ban residue burning). In other words, it is possible that policies come in packages, which would make identifying individual effects difficult. Because of this, in our analysis, we deal with this by considering policy variables separately.In using a fixed effects approach to estimate equation 2.1, it appears that our models perform relatively well. The goodness of fit measures, the R 2 statistics, range from 0.36 to 0.50 for the village-level mode (Table 50). These high measures mean that the fit is relatively good for this type of analysis. The household-level model also performed well.The relative high Pseudo R 2 (from 0.46 to 0.48) statistics and high Chi2 (from 183 to 192) statistics show the model fits well (Table 51).The relatively satisfactory performance of the model can also be analyzed from the coefficients of some of the control variables. Many of the coefficients of control variables in the equations have the expected signs and are statistically significant. For example, as estimated in the household-level model, farmers cultivating predominantly clay soils rarely adopt CA technology (Table 51). In fact, extension agents do not encourage using CA technologies on clay soils because water penetration and germination is poorer in such soils if CA technology is used. Adoption of CA technology is also significantly correlated with age of household.More importantly, we found in the multivariate analysis-as was so clear in the descriptive statistics-that CA adoption is affected by the factor endowments that characterize villages and farm households. Specifically, the coefficients of variables measuring the opportunity cost of the farm household (the share of the village/family labor force that works off-farm) are positive and statistically significant in both the village-and household-level models (Tables 50 and 51). Although the coefficient of the land variable is not significant, the sign suggests that farmers with more land (or villages with farmers with more land) adopt CA technology more frequently. Hence, factor endowments appear to be one of the most important determinants of CA technology adoption.We also saw evidence in our multivariate analysis that switching technologies may be expensive (or at least risky). From our household-based analysis, the coefficient of the wealth variable (which is positive and significant) suggests that rich farmers are more likely to adopt CA technology than poor ones (Table 51). In addition, the coefficients of variables that measure the presence of local machine-subsidizing policies (which could help alleviate the wealth constraint) is positive and statistically significant in the village-level model (Table 50). Together, these results suggest that, ceteris paribus, a policy that seeks to assist farmers in financing initial adoption indeed appears to promote the adoption of CA technology.Our results-also as seen in the descriptive statistics-demonstrate the importance of other policy efforts, including government initiatives to run extension projects. First, when policies banning residue burning are well promoted (and perhaps effectively enforced), village-and household-level regressions show that CA adoption rates rise (Tables 50 and 51). Moreover, when villages host extension projects featuring CA technology, coefficients of variables measuring these extension efforts are positive and statistically significant.Based on the literature review, we found that, in most cases, CA can increase wheat yield. Eighty-three percent of studies reported that after CA adoption, wheat yield increased, and only 17% reported that CA resulted in wheat yield reduction. Although we found some negative impacts of CA on wheat yield, we did not find any negative impact on maize yield in the literature. Based on our 2005 field survey, and applying both descriptive statistic and econometric analyses, we found that CA did not increase crop yield significantly (Table 53). Compared with wheat yields of farmers adopting CA technologies (2220 kg/ha), yields of conventional farmers was higher (3225 kg/ha) (Wang et al., 2007). However, farmers adopting CA had higher maize yield (5010 kg/ha) than non-adopting farmers (4478 kg/ha). Crop yield is influenced not only by tillage technologies (such as CA or conventional tillage), but also by many other socio-economic variables. To determine the real impact of CA technologies on crop yields, we established econometric models for both wheat and maize yields. Econometric results show that CA adoption did not significantly increase or reduce wheat yield, since the coefficients of CA variables in the models are not statistically significant. The econometric model for maize yield (not shown) was similar. In sum, CA adoption had no significant impact on crop yield.In our 2008 field survey, we again asked farmers about the impacts of CA on wheat and maize yields (Table 52). It seems that in some areas of the YRB, in the beginning of CA adoption, crop yield increased, while in other areas, crop yield decreased. For example, our survey found that in 47% of villages, after CA adoption, wheat yield increased 2-47%, while in 53% of villages wheat yield decreased 1-69%. Similarly, maize yield increased 11-31% in 27% of villages, and decreased 8-40% in 73% of villages.Farmers provided some explanation for the positive and negative impacts of CA on maize and wheat yields. Farmers in Henan and Shandong Provinces considered that yield increase was due to the preservation of soil moisture. Conversely, they believed that yield decreased as a result of the deleterious effects of poor seed drills on soils. Seed varieties and climate change are two other important reasons for yield reduction. Farmers in Ningxia Province gave three reasons for yield reduction after CA adoption: (1) CA does not preserve soil moisture; (2) manure cannot be used on the fields; and (3) weed problems worsen after CA adoption.Based on either descriptive statistics analysis or econometric analysis, the 2005 survey results show that CA adoption can significantly reduce labor input. Full CA adoption can reduce labor input of wheat production by 50% (Table 55), while Partial CA can effect a reduction of 33-67%. For maize production, Full CA can reduce labor input by 46%, and Partial CA can reduce labor input 15-46%. We found similar data for potato and oats. The labor effect is not hard to understand: since CA farmers do not need to prepare the land; their labor input for land preparation is zero. However, farmers who do traditional tillage have a labor input of 10.5 days per ha. For other activities such as harrowing, fertilizer application, seeding, weeding and cleaning residue, labor requirements of CA farmers are lower than those of farmers who do not adopt CA. In our econometric model for wheat labor input, the dummy variable of CA adoption is negative and significant, which means that after controlling other factors, farmers adopting CA will significantly reduce labor use (about 33%). We found results for maize production were similar to those for wheat production. Econometric results showed that compared with traditional agriculture, labor input for maize production under CA can decrease by about 86%. Due to the reduction of production costs, the research also shows that CA can increase farmer income. Some 60% of literature reported that CA can increase farmer income by less than 30% (Zhao and Shi, 2006). A further 20% of literature found that after adopting CA farmer income can increase by 40% to 60% (Gao, 2006). The remaining 20% of literature demonstrates that CA even can increase farmer income by more than 70% (Ma et al., 2006).We conducted both descriptive and quantitative analysis using econometric models to identify the actual impact of CA technologies on poverty (Table 56). Based on descriptive analysis, we found that compared with the group that did not adopt any CA technologies, the adopting group had a lower share (about 4%) of households under the extreme poverty line2. The results of our econometric model are consistent with our descriptive analysis.Our regression results show that many coefficients of our control variables have the expected signs and are statistically significant. Importantly, we found that adoption of CA technologies can significantly reduce poverty by 5%.Based on our 2008 field survey, CA adoption has some influence on women's labor input and non-farm labor time. For example, 33% of villages in Ningxia Province reported that due to CA adoption, labor intensity decreased. Mechanization of CA means women's work is enough for agriculture, and more labor force can go outside to find non-farm jobs. In Henan Province, 100% of villages reported that due to CA adoption, women's labor time increased, since most men looked outside for non-farm jobs. In addition, they said there are more weeds in no-tillage plots, which need more labor to eliminate weeds. In Shandong Province, no villages reported that CA influenced the labor input of women.Most villages in our 2008 field survey reported that their environment have been influenced by the adoption of CA. On average, 71% of villages reported that their environment has been influenced. In Shandong Province, 83% of villages have been affected. In Ningxia and Henan Provinces, this number is 67% and 60%, respectively. Some farmers said that CA has some effect on water use efficiency, but their responses differ by region. For example, in Shandong Province, 50% of farmers said it saved water by 20% to 50%. The other half of farmers said that there was no change at all. In Ningxia Province, most farmers said they did not observe such effects. Only one said water evaporation decreased, but that the capacity for saving rainfall decreased, too. Rain is lost because of the smooth land surface. In Henan Province, the majority answered that there were no changes. Only one village said that it did not save water, but wasted 50% water.Some farmers pointed out that soil quality improved due to CA adoption. In Henan Province, 60% of villages said there were no changes, and 40% said soil quality was better, but they were not able to specifically quantify the improvement. In Shandong Province, 50% of villages said that the soil is getting better, but again without detailed knowledge of the changes. The rest were not aware of any change at all. In Ningxia Province there was no awareness of the impacts of CA on soil quality.Reduced soil erosion as a result of CA adoption was also reported by some farmers. In Henan Province, 60% of farmers do not know, 20% think it is getting less but could not quantify the reduction. In Shandong Province, the majority answered that there were no changes; only one village said they were unable to respond, for lack of understanding. However, in Ningxia Province, farmers were unaware of the impacts of CA on soil erosion. 2 The extreme poverty line is 693 yuan (USD 99) per capita.Increased soil organic matter content is another possible, positive environmental effect of CA adoption. In Henan Province, 80% of villages said they had no idea, while 20% said organic matter content increased 0.03%, e.g., from 0.05% to 0.08%. In Shandong Province, two out of three villages had no idea. The others said it increased. One of them said determination of potassium increased by 10%. However, in Ningxia Province, no one knows the impact of CA on organic matter content.Conservation agriculture can also reduce chemicals use. In Henan Province, 60% of villages said there was no change, while 40% said it increased by 20-50%. In Shandong Province, the majority answered that there were no changes. Only one village said that pesticide use decreased by 10%. However, in Ningxia Province, no one knew of such impact of CA.The data used in this report come from our field survey in four provinces of northern China. Based on these findings, it seems that if China implements the policy banning residue burning well, conducts more CA demonstrations, provides more labor opportunities and better irrigation, and if the cost of replacing existing machines and draft animals is low, CA technology will be adopted in the country quickly. However, for now, labor in China is intensive, and the ability of farmers to replace existing machines or animals is still low. In the future, increasing labor opportunities and farmers' capital investment capacity, and implementing more CA demonstrations and improving irrigation will facilitate CA technology adoption.Based on our 2005 field survey, we found that CA did not increase crop yield significantly.In our 2008 field survey, we asked farmers about the impacts of CA on wheat and maize yields. It seems that in some areas of the Yellow River Basin, at the beginning of CA adoption, crop yields increased, while in other areas, crop yields decreased.The 2005 survey results show that adopting CA can significantly reduce labor input. Based on our 2008 field survey, most farmers also think that CA can reduce production costs, especially for labor input.Due to reduction of production inputs, studies have also found that CA increases farmer income: 60% reported that CA can increase farmer income by nearly 30%. Based on descriptive and quantitative analysis using econometric models, we found that adoption of CA technologies can significantly reduce poverty by 5%. Based on our field survey in 2008, CA adoption has some influence on the labor input of women and non-farm labor time.Conservation agriculture adoption has three types of environmental impacts: (1) it contributes to increasing water use efficiency; (2) it increases soil moisture and reduces soil water evaporation by about 30%; and (3) it can reduce runoff of surface water by about 60%. Also, because some or all residues are retained on the soil surface, not burned, environmental pollution is reduced. During the 2008 field survey, 71% of villages reported that their environment had been influenced by CA adoption. Some farmers said that the CA had some effect on water use efficiency, but their responses differ by region.Encourage the development of a policy environment that does not discriminate against conservation agriculture practices and of input, equipment and rental markets needed to make conservation agriculture practices generally accessible.The project design engaged senior leaders from each of the seven participating organizations in order, inter alia, to facilitate the communication of project results to policy makers at national, Provincial and County level, related to CA promotion including national and regional plans, CA extension programs and subsidies on CA equipment. Relevant officials from MOA, Provincial and Local Government were regularly invited to visit field demonstration sites and observe the performance of CA in farmers' fields. Project results were shared regularly with the Yellow River Commission so Basin planners and policy makers could incorporate the implications of the field research into decisions on Basin development. Project scientists engaged in relevant debates, for example the potential of CA to mitigate dust storms affecting Beijing through CA.The socioeconomic surveys identified policy and socio-economic factors which are important drivers of wider adoption of CA technology. Results show that policy intervention (such as machinery subsidy policy and policy of forbidding burning residue) can play some role in promoting the adoption of CA technology.At a national level, project leaders contributed to the CA component of the national Five Year Plan which targeted resources for the promotion of CA in China. The incorporation of the CA blueprint in the national plan is a major accomplishment. In addition, the implications of the project results were brought to the attention of the Minister of Agriculture.At the provincial level, some project staff participated in provincial meetings on machinery subsidy in order to decide which farm equipment should receive subsidy from the National Government. As a consequence, one of the no-till seeders developed with project support has been added to the Agricultural Machinery Purchase Allowance list, implying a subsidy for farmers equivalent to 40% of purchase price, thus promoting manufacture and sales of the no-till seeder.The Yellow River Commission was regularly briefed on project results through visits of project staff and participation in the Yellow River Commission Forum in 2007. Commission leaders are aware of the potential of CA to contribute to water-efficient sustainable development in the Basin.There has been a high level of engagement with policy makers at national, Basin, Provincial and County levels which has developed an understanding of the potential for CA and the required adjustments to policy. It is expected that the benefits of these project actions will continue to be seen with ongoing adjustments to future plans and policies to support CA. The project worked with seven major local partners, including the Chinese Agricultural University, research organizations or universities in five Provinces, and station and adaptive researchers and extension workers in five pilot Counties. Furthermore the project worked with farm equipment factories in three Provinces. Through these local partners, several hundred professional research and extension staff improved their management of CA trials and demonstrations. In addition, the project attracted students to contribute to the analysis of research results in the course of their thesis work. While many of the partners had strong scientific capacity for research on varieties, agronomy, soil management and economic analysis, it was recognized that innovation for CA is complex and demands systems and participatory research. While the project sought to strengthen component research field skills, especially through one-on-one mentoring by international scientists, workshops and an international study were organized in order to strengthen capacity to design, manage and implement collaborative multi-stakeholder collaborative research and development.Some 50 students in partner institutions received, or will shortly receive, Bachelors, Masters or Ph D degrees based on project research data and supervised by project scientists. Another valuable capacity building activity was the regular \"on the job\" advice and mentoring of international scientists from CIMMYT and IMWI on the management of research and demonstration fields, interpretation of results, and on hydrology and crop modeling using DSSAT. International scientists from CIMMYT introduced new research tools such as the GreenSeeker NDVI sensor to estimate nitrogen use efficiency and web based knowledge sharing tools. One innovation in capacity building was the organization of the traveling workshops around mid-year to review and learn from the field activities in each pilot County. This successfully brought together multi-disciplinary groups of research, academic and extension staff from different partner institutions to visit, once per year, the field work of a couple of Provinces and learn together through discussions of site selection and characterization, experimental design, specification of treatments (especially the timing and tillage practices, and the height and nature of retained crop residues) and interpretation of results.In terms of more formal capacity building, more than 50 researchers participated in the Participatory Research Workshop in 2006 or the Impact Pathways Workshop in 2007. The former was restricted to project researchers and covered participatory diagnoses, on-farm research, and participatory farmer evaluation. The workshop evaluation recorded a substantial increase in participants' understanding and knowledge. With strengthened skills, these partner staff demonstrated greater confidence and effectiveness in managing participatory demonstrations. The Impact Pathways Workshop was attended by scientists from project partners, as well as staff from other Basin projects, and brought a new paradigm to the networks of actors which advance innovation and the multiple channels through which farmers acquire and benefit from improved CA technologies. One study tour was organized to India for partner scientists to observe the rapid spread of CA in north-west India.There has been two-way benefit from the exposure of participating scientists in the Ghana (Yan Changrong) and Addis (staff member from Yan Changrong's team) workshops, and the study tour to India. Collaborating scientists have acquired a greater understanding of the biophysical and socioeconomic aspects of resource-productivity enhancing technologies and their adoption.The project made substantial contributions to the capacity of partners, both in the science of CA and the innovative approaches to multi-stakeholder CA R&D through formal and informal capacity building. Given the great importance and need for continuing adaptation and expansion of CA to other Counties and Provinces in China, there is arguably high value (and evident strong demand) for continued capacity building in innovative approaches to collaborative R&D for CA.The positive results from this project are relevant to rainfed areas outside the four target Provinces and outside China. Site-similarity analysis will aid the targeting, i.e., definition of the most likely areas of extended impact to other areas with similar agro-ecologies and relevant institutional settings, including water scarce and also cool temperate environments, e.g., in Central and South Asia. CPWF and the international centers (CIMMYT and IMWI) could facilitate the dissemination of the IPGs in various ways, including the presentation of project results in workshops and even the World Congress on Conservation Agriculture. Publications (in English language for the international community) resulting from this project, intended both for the scientific community and for the general public, will spread the knowledge outputs of this research, including the existence of the patents, and awareness of the benefits of conservation agriculture on farmer livelihoods, the natural resource base and the environment. Of the changes listed above, which have the greatest potential to be adopted and have impact? What might the potential be on the ultimate beneficiaries?From policy makers to farmers there is a greater understanding of the potential of CA to contribute to sustainable development. One notable outcome is the greater understanding of the potential role of CA in sustainable development by leaders of the Yellow River Commission. The capacity and profile including visibility built through the project enabled project organizations to submit successful proposals for science funding, and be awarded 5 national CA and 10 provincial CA projects, thus leveraging the CPWF investment in China. While the outcomes in terms of policy makers have been referred to above, including a CA component in the national Five Year Plan, there have been major outcomes and impacts at the local level in pilot Counties through demonstration and training. For example, more than 5000 farmers took part in project training courses or field days at the CA demonstrations, and they will have shared their observations on CA with other farmers in their villages. The socio-economic survey results show that the adoption of technologies of CA, although still low at a national level, speeded up during the current decade. The results of the socioeconomic survey and the field trials and demonstrations substantially influenced the preparation of an Asian Development Bank loan proposal for China.Naturally, the impacts at farm level of CA adoption have been substantial (numbers of farmers are great even if proportion of adopters is still low). Increased farm incomes have arisen from the 25% or more reduction in production costs, and according to the survey results the adoption of CA technologies significantly reduced farm household poverty. As well as increasing income, CA has increased the water use efficiency and nutrient use efficiency, and also reduced soil erosion from wind and water.All the above have potential for strong impact: however, the greatest potential for impact would lie with incorporation of the CA blueprint in the National Plan will have the, through increased adaptation, subsidies and extension effort, especially in the context of growing environmental challenges in rural China. The farmer beneficiaries will benefit from increased income and improved soil health (physical assets). The expansion of the YRB CA R&D to other Basins in China would increase spillover benefits.What still needs to be done to achieve this potential? Are measures in place (e.g., a new project, on-going commitments) to achieve this potential? Please describe what will happen when the project ends.Ongoing mentoring of CA technology/package adaptation in the current and other Provinces/basins in China; monitoring of adoption and identification of CA performance, policy and institutional constraints to adoption; capacity building at Provincial and County levels; maintenance of international links and networks for international CA knowledge sharing.Each row of the table above is an impact pathway describing how the project contributed to outcomes in a particular actor or actors. Which of these impact pathways were unexpected (compared to expectations at the beginning of the project?)Incorporation of the \"CA blueprint\" in the national Five Year Plan was hoped for but not expected -whereas improvements in plans for CA at Provincial and County level were expected.Why were they unexpected? How was the project able to take advantage of them?Normally beyond reach of a small project. Because of early CA field results and international experience gained through the study tour of the senior project leaders, the potential of CA was brought to the attention of the national Minister of Agriculture and national planners.What would you do differently next time to better achieve outcomes (i.e. changes in stakeholder knowledge, attitudes, skills and practice)?Advance the training in participatory research and impact pathways. Increase the knowledge sharing through Chinese language web CA knowledge platforms within the Basin; and strengthen English language links to Asian and OECD countries' experience with CA, through, for example, participation in international conferences on CA.With the implementation of this project, participants improved their research capacities greatly and established more extensive collaborative relationships across Provinces and with other countries.Given the importance of increasing water productivity and reducing poverty in the YRB and China, the first recommendation is to reinforce and expand the platform for CA R & D in China -focusing on further research on selected CA production and policy issues and expanding the project footprint on the ground beyond the current pilot Counties.While science is strong in Chinese organizations, strengthening international partnerships on CA is a priority. In particular, continuing exposure to cutting edge science, e.g., GreenSeeker NDVI sensors and research methods, e.g., impact pathways and participatory research, would be of immense value to CA in China.Further research should be conducted on variety selection and supporting cultivation technology to perfect CA technology, for which linkages to sources of international germplasm, equipment and research would be beneficial. Clearly, simply copying the methods and technologies from other places will not be effective. The research and demonstration of CA systems needs to be targeted to various local conditions, in relation to socio-economic and environmental circumstances.Farmer training will have to be strengthened to improve farmers' knowledge and skills related to CA technology. For instance, farmer perceptions of CA systems is one two of the major impediments to the expansion of CA. It is important to convey a whole CA system approach rather than individual component technologies.Public private cooperation is required for the development of appropriate CA equipment.A scientists-technicians-governments-factories-farmers innovation system should be tested and expanded for a long-term expansion of CA systems.Policy making should pay attention to the ecological and environmental benefits of CA which complement the benefits from productivity and poverty reduction. With feasible CA technologies now demonstrated, the government can consider the strengthening of the implementation of the policy of forbidding burning residue."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4711603174.json b/main/part_2/4711603174.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6727fbff5e4fa6d3fc404c19d4ab2c7e759c9013 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4711603174.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"95b54079-845e-48bd-9c79-38c15bb1fc08","content":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4713316177.json b/main/part_2/4713316177.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d635273b0a5261945d2d5299ba46ec1a0799c35 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4713316177.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3c3ff20fda5c16bcc3a09c366628bd18","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/2953a109-5502-45ef-ba0a-a326ffca5db3/content","id":"-2102001629"},"keywords":["Africa","Farmer evaluation","Maize","Male sterility","Participatory variety evaluation"],"sieverID":"70b1a340-d121-4e67-b441-9ca05a06e7e1","content":"Incorporating the dominant male sterile gene, Ms44, in new maize varieties results in 50% non-pollen producing (FNP) varieties. This makes the varieties more nitrogen efficient and increases yield directly by an average of 200 kg ha −1 across yield levels. However, as half of the plants do not shed pollen, the presence of Ms44 in an FNP variety is clearly visible. This technology can improve food production and security in the African maize-based agri-food systems, but only if accepted by farmers. Farmers were therefore invited to 11 on-farm, researcher managed trial sites of FNP varieties in Kenya over 2 years. They were asked to identify the traits they find important in evaluating maize varieties and to score the FNP varieties, as well as their conventional counterparts, on these criteria (including yield, resistance to pests, and cob size) and overall, using a five-point hedonic scale. In total, 2,697 farmers participated, of which 62% were women. Farmers mentioned many traits they find important, especially yield and related traits, early maturity, and drought resistance, but also tassel and pollen formation. In 2017, mid-season, participants scored FNP varieties lower than conventional varieties on tassel and pollen formation, indicating that farmers could distinguish the trait. FNP varieties still received higher scores for yield and overall evaluation. In mid-season 2018, participants no longer scored FNP varieties lower for pollen formation as they now understood the technology. In both years, at the end-season evaluation, scores for tassel formation were not different, but participants scored FNP varieties higher for yield and overall. We conclude that farmers recognized the FNP trait but did not mind it as they clearly favored its yield advantage. The FNP technology, therefore, has high potential not only to increase maize yields, food production, and food security in the agricultural systems of Africa but also to increase varietal turnover and the adoption of new, high-yielding, climate-smart maize hybrids.Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has difficulties feeding its population. The major agricultural systems are based on maize as the primary food crop, but its production has not kept up with the rapidly increasing population. In Kenya, the population increased from 8.4 to 44.9 million people between 1961 and 2014 (an increase of 430%); during the same period, yield increased only from 1.4 to 1.8 kg ha −1 (43%) and stagnated in the last decades (FAOSTAT, 2022). Consequently, maize production per capita has decreased substantially, from 145 kg/person in the 1970s to only 77 kg/person between 2004and 2014(FAOSTAT, 2020)). In the Kenyan maize-based agricultural system, farmers have adopted mainly improved maize varieties, but they are not as enthusiastic about fertilizer, and the quantities applied are too low to restore soil fertility (De Groote et al., 2005;Duflo et al., 2008;Jena et al., 2020). In most of SSA, fallow areas have disappeared, and the use of organic and chemical fertilizers is too low to maintain soil fertility (Binswanger-Mkhize and Savastano, 2017). Nitrogen is one of the most crucial crop nutrients (together with phosphate and potassium) and its incomplete application in fertilizer is one of the major limiting factors for maize production in Africa (Vanlauwe et al., 2011). Therefore, developing maize varieties that are more nitrogen efficient can make a significant contribution to increasing yields and improving food security in Kenya and SSA.A new hybrid seed production technology (SPT) incorporates the dominant mutant malesterility gene Ms44 in the female parent (Fox et al., 2017). The technology produces cleaner seed, as pollination from the female parent is not possible, leading to lower seed production cost as detasseling is not needed. When using this hybrid seed, half the plants carry the MS44 allele and their male flowers are sterile. Early in plant development, if nitrogen is limited, the nitrogen normally used for tassel and pollen development will be used for ear and kernel growth instead (Loussaert et al., 2017). As a result, the technology increases yields under various environmental conditions, especially nitrogen stress (Collinson et al., 2022;Fox et al., 2017).As half of the plants do not shed pollen, the presence of Ms44 in an FNP variety is clearly visible; further, the non-pollen producing (FNP) plants show a slight reduction in plant height, tassel size, have thin anthers, and do not contain viable pollen (Supplementary Material Fig. S1). As farmers are keen observers of their crops, they will likely observe the differences in the new FNP varieties. Further, farmers tend to be conservative and risk-averse (Visser et al., 2020) and might object to the atypical varieties, preferring to stick to their old, conventional ones. Therefore, before bringing FNP varieties with the new traits into the farming system and on the market, it is essential to elicit farmers' opinion on the acceptability of their phenotype and to have farmers evaluate the new varieties and compare them to the conventional varieties.Therefore, this study's specific objectives were (1) analysis of the traits that farmers find important in evaluating maize varieties, in particular the importance of tassel formation and pollen shed and (2) farmer evaluation of the new FNP varieties on those criteria, in comparison to conventional varieties. Farmers were invited to different trial sites of FNP varieties in Kenya. They were asked to identify the traits they find important in evaluating maize varieties and to quantify the importance of each of these criteria. Further, we asked farmers to score the FNP varieties as well as their conventional counterparts (identified only by a number) on these criteria (including yield, resistance, and cob size) and overall. To understand farmers' reaction to the FNP trait, we had to include tassel formation and pollen shed in the evaluation. However, drawing attention to these might negatively affect the assessment of other traits of the FNP varieties or their overall evaluation. To analyze this possible bias, only half the farmers, randomly selected, were asked to evaluate the varieties on tassel formation and pollen shed, while those criteria were skipped for the other participants, to avoid drawing attention to what might be perceived as negative.The results of this study bring important and timely information on the FNP technology that has high potential to increase maize yields, food production, and food security in the agri-food systems of SSA. The potential of the technology stems from increasing nitrogen efficiency in a continent where insufficient nitrogen application remains a major constraint to yield. Moreover, as the maize-based agricultural systems in SSA lag behind those from other regions in varietal turnover (Abate et al., 2017;Walker et al., 2015), the technology could also be beneficial to the broader system by increasing the adoption of new, high-yielding, climate-smart maize hybrids.We base our conceptual framework on Lancaster's model of consumer choice, which proposes that consumers derive satisfaction not from the goods themselves but from the attributes they provide (Lancaster, 1966). Similarly, farmers derive pleasure from the different qualities of new maize varieties and compare them to the characteristics of the varieties they currently use. Farmers therefore evaluate maize varieties on a range of traits (or attributes) that differ in importance (yield is typically more important than processing quality) (De Groote et al., 2002). In past experiences, tassel development and the quantity of pollen shed were not usually mentioned as important criteria by farmers in the selection of their varieties (De Groote et al., 2004, 2002;Siambi et al., 2002), at least not in open-ended questions.To make sure that we understand the importance of the tassel and pollen in farmers' evaluation of maize varieties, these traits need to be specifically asked about. At the same time, by raising the question, the researcher draws attention to a trait that might otherwise go unnoticed, increasing its importance and possibly biasing the evaluation. This can negatively affect farmers' evaluation of the varieties with a low score on that criterion and so affect the overall score. The effect of including these two criteria in the overall evaluation can, however, be measured by appropriately adjusting the experimental design. We therefore assigned the participating farmers randomly to two treatment groups, and in the first one including the evaluation of the tassel (treatment group 1), and in the second one including the evaluation of both tassel and pollen (treatment group 2), and comparing them to a control group where these criteria were not included. At the end-season evaluation, as the pollen was no longer visible, the pollen criterion was dropped from the evaluation, so treatment groups 1 and 2 were merged. Participants in the control group were not asked to evaluate tassel or pollen. Because in the first year (2017) mid-season, the evaluations of the varieties by the two treatment groups were very similar, the groups were also merged during the mid-season evaluation in the second year (2018).The evaluation was superimposed on a set of trials with FNP varieties conducted in Kenya's farmers' fields in the long rainy seasons of 2017 and 2018 (Collinson et al., 2022). The trial compared conventional hybrids with the FNP version of the same hybrid, with two replicates in each site. In 2017, the hybrids used were combinations of two female lines (KTN71-6 and CML550) and two male lines (CML572 and CML494), resulting in four entries (Table 1). We repeated each entry once, resulting in 16 plots in each trial. In this first year, the varieties were chosen based more on availability than suitability to the regions, and the varieties were all single crosses. In the second year, 2018, more varieties were available. Eight varieties, of which four were three-way crosses, were included in the trial, with more varieties adapted to the study areas.Previous studies with farmers in participatory variety evaluation during participatory rural appraisals provided a set of traits that farmers found necessary in evaluating maize varieties in Kenya (Bett et al., 2002;De Groote et al., 2002;Siambi et al., 2002). In 2017, we included 13 of these traits (rows 1-13 in Table 2). Based on discussions with the farmers, we included four more criteria in 2018 (rows 14-17). To confirm the importance of these criteria to the participants of this study, we asked them to give the criteria a score for importance (0 = not important, 1 = somewhat important, 2 = important, 3 = very important) (Table 2).Participants were asked to evaluate the different entries on these criteria. In 2017, they assessed the four entries and their replicates, with 16 plots in total. In 2018, there were twice as many entries, 16, so it became difficult for one participant to evaluate them twice. Therefore, each participant was only asked to consider one of the two replicates, randomly assigned. To score the entries, participants used a 5-point Likert scale (Likert, 1932). Experience has shown that a 5-point scale is convenient for farmers and can easily be translated into any language (De Groote et al., 2002, 2010). However, experience has also shown that using numbers for the scores can be confusing, as \"1\" can indicate both a very good or a very poor score. The numbers were therefore replaced by letter scores, which corresponded to the Kenyan school system (Worku et al., In 2108, four criteria were added. d In the mid-season of 2017, farmers were randomly assigned to three groups: control, treatment 1, and treatment 2; all participants evaluated the varieties on criteria 1 to 13 and 16, both treatment groups also on criterion 14, only those in treatment 2 on criterion 15. In 2018, treatment groups 1 and 2 were merged. ). The options were A (like very much), B (like), C (neither like nor dislike), D (dislike), and E (dislike very much). In 2017, farmers were randomly assigned to different groups: control (participants in this group were asked to evaluate the entries on 13 specific traits and overall, but not on tassel formation or pollen shed); treatment 1 (participants evaluated entries on the same traits plus the trait \"good tassel formation\"); and treatment 2 (participants evaluated entries on the same traits as those in treatment 1 plus the trait \"amount of pollen shed\"). As the results of 2017 indicated that the results of treatments 1 and 2 were very similar, these two treatment groups were merged into one group in 2018, and the members evaluated the entries on both tassel and pollen. All criteria were expressed on the questionnaire in both English and Kiswahili, the two national languages in Kenya. Depending on the situation, the criteria were translated into local languages in the different counties. The questionnaires are found in the Supplementary Materials (S2 and S3).In selecting varieties, farmers are also concerned about other factors like seed source, price, availability, and the possibility of using their own saved seeds. However, in this study, we were only comparing conventional hybrids to the same varieties in which the FNP trait was added. In this experimental and study design, therefore, all other factors remain constant.Power calculations indicated that about 120-166 farmers were needed to make a distinction between the two types of varieties. However, for a design with three treatment arms, we needed at least 200-250 participants, spread over several sites. Finally, to let farmers observe tassels and pollen shed, the evaluations needed to be conducted at the mid-season and, to observe yield, also at the end-season.In 2017, participatory evaluations were organized in five trial sites at the mid-season and eight at the end-season. In 2018, the breeders had dropped two of the eight trial sites for different reasons and replaced with other nearby trial sites, and evaluations took place in all these eight sites at both mid-and end-seasons. The sites were located in six counties in both western and eastern Kenya (Table 3, Supplementary Material Fig. S4). The mid-season evaluations took place from June to early July, and the end-season evaluations took place from the end of July to August, on one day per site. Altogether 1,006 people participated in 2017, with more (73%) at the end-season and 1,691 in 2018 (about half in each season). A majority of participants (62%) were women, and this was consistent over seasons, sites, and years, with few exceptions.The evaluations followed the standard procedure. First, scientists and farmers were introduced to each other. Then the methods and procedures were explained, and each trait was explained and discussed in detail. The scores to be used for the importance of the traits as well as those used for evaluation were explained. Afterward, participants were organized into groups of 5-10, each accompanied by an enumerator. The participants first filled in an informed consent form, followed by a short socioeconomic questionnaire that included questions on age, sex, education, income, and so forth (Supplementary Materials S2 and S3). They then proceeded to the field where they evaluated the different plots-16 plots in each trial, numbered consecutively, without any indication or mention of variety or FNP-on the different traits. After the participatory variety evaluation, participants regrouped and were offered a snack and a drink. At this point, the principle of the Ms44 gene and the FNP trait was explained to them, what it looked like and how it worked, and they subsequently engaged in an open group discussion, where they could ask more questions and express their opinions.First, the importance of the different traits was assessed by averaging the importance scores given by participants on a scale of 1 to 4, and compared by season, as farmers can have different priorities over the different seasons. Only participants of the treatment groups were asked to state the importance of the FNP-related traits: pollen produced and tassel formation. However, the importance of these traits was asked for after providing information on the other traits and before observing the varieties in the field visits. Therefore, the treatment could not affect the stated importance of other traits.Next, for each trait, the ordinal scores were converted from their alphabetical form to numerical values (A = 5 to E = 1), and the average scores calculated for all the plots, to compare the FNP entries with their conventional counterparts graphically and statistically using pairwise t-tests. However, even though the variables now have numerical values, they are still on an ordinal scale, not an interval scale. This means that a value of four is higher than a value of two, but it does not mean that a value of four is twice that of a value of two, as it would be for an interval scale. Most statistical calculations, such as mean values and standard errors, assume interval scales and their use with ordinal scales is problematic. Therefore, specific analytical methods for this type of data have been developed, in particular ordinal regression (McCullagh, 1980), which does not require the assumptions of the interval scale. Ordinal regression has been specifically recommended for the analysis of farmer evaluation scores (Coe, 2002). It has been used in East Africa for different technologies including integrated pest and soil fertility management (De Groote et al., 2010) and farmer participatory evaluation of new maize varieties (Worku et al., 2020). For comparing varieties, participants typically evaluate different varieties simultaneously, and those scores are likely to be correlated. Hence, random effects should be added to the model, as was done in a previous study on farmers' evaluation of maize varieties in East Africa (Worku et al., 2020). The ordinal model with random effects was used for this study to analyze farmers' evaluations and compare FNP vs. conventional varieties for the different traits. We also analyzed the effect of the different treatments by including them in the model.Finally, to analyze the importance of the different criteria in the actual evaluation, we regressed the scores that the varieties received for individual traits on the overall scores that they received. The coefficients of the individual traits could then be interpreted as their weights in the overall score, as the 'revealed importance', and compared to the importance scores given to the criteria earlier, which could be interpreted as the 'stated importance'. Unlike that of the stated importance, analysis of the revealed importance also allows us to compare the treatment groups with the control to see if drawing attention to the tassel and pollen affected the overall scores or the scores on other traits.Participants were adults of all ages (from 17 to 88), with a majority of women (62%) (Table 4).Most participants were farmers with many years of farming experience, on average 17 years. Most had also finished primary education, with an average of 8 years of formal education (the length of primary school education in Kenya). Average annual cash income was KES 83 297 (about US$ 830), about half of which came from agriculture (a bit more from crops than from livestock), a quarter from salary and a quarter from business and trade. Most participants owned their farm, with an average size of almost one ha (0.77 ha), about half of which in maize (0.46 ha). Nearly all participating farmers used improved maize varieties (90%) and fertilizer (93%). Most participants practiced a mixed cropping/livestock system; about two-thirds of participants owned cattle and a quarter owned oxen.Farmers' evaluation of maize varieties: stated importance of traitsWhen participants were asked to score the importance of the different traits (or criteria) on a scale of 0 (not important) to 3 (very important), they gave high scores to most of the traits (Figure 1). During the mid-season evaluation, the traits which received the highest scores on importance were yield, early maturity, cob size, and a number of cobs; these all received an average score of between 2.5 and 2.7. When farmers were asked at the mid-season evaluation if tassel formation was important, they scored the trait very highly (2.68) second only to yield (2.69) (out of a maximum of 3).Similarly, the amount of pollen shed received an importance score of 2.6. Participants were not asked to score all traits for importance during the mid-season evaluation; ear-related traits in particular were not discussed as they could not yet be observed at this point in time. In the end-season evaluation, however, tassel formation only scored 2.44, which put it in the third-to-last position in terms of importance among criteria. Also, most traits in the end-season evaluation received even higher importance scores than in the mid-season evaluation, and almost all criteria received a score between 2.5 and 3. There was no significant difference in the importance of these traits between treatment farmers (those asked to evaluate the tassel and pollen) and control farmers (who were not). Farmers were invited to the trials twice, once at the mid-season and once at the end-season, and during each visit they were asked to score the varieties on a 5-point scale for the different traits. By converting the scores to numerical values (from 1 to 5), mean scores could be calculated for the FNP varieties and their conventional counterparts and compared using the pairwise t-test. During the mid-season evaluation of 2017, the conventional varieties received significantly higher scores on tassel formation and pollen shed than the FNP varieties, indicating that farmers could visually distinguish FNP from conventional varieties and preferred the latter on these traits (Figure 2). However, in the mid-season, the score for yield and the score for related traits such as cob size were higher for FNP varieties than for conventional ones; otherwise, there was little difference between the scores of both types of variety. Finally, the overall score of the FNP varieties was significantly higher than that of the conventional, pollen-producing varieties.In the end-season (at harvest), the evaluation for pollen formation was dropped, as there is no pollen to be seen in maize at this stage, but the tassel is still visible, although dried and brown, so farmers in both treatment groups were asked to evaluate this trait. However, the scores for tassel formation were no longer different between FNP and conventional varieties, indicating that participants could no longer tell the difference. This is understandable as, at this stage, the maize plant including the tassel has dried up and turned brown. Further, FNP varieties generally scored better on several individual criteria, especially cob size and yield, and their overall scores were significantly better than those of the conventional varieties. The average scores for all varieties on different traits and seasons are presented in Supplementary Materials Table S5. For a more robust statistical analysis, and taking into account the nature of the data, we used an ordinal regression model with random effects. We conducted the analysis for the three major traits relevant to male sterility: tassel formation and pollen shed (expected to be affected negatively), yield (expected to be affected positively), and overall evaluation, the synthesis (Table 5). We also included in the model the four different varieties (the first one being the omitted category), next to the FNP trait. Only farmers in the treatment groups were invited to evaluate the amount of pollen shed (treatment 1) or good tassel formation (treatments 1 and 2).Treatment 1 participants could clearly distinguish FNP varieties from conventional varieties in the mid-season evaluation by the amount of pollen shed and scored them significantly lower. The coefficient (−0.39) is the log odds ratio and its exponent (0.67) the odds ratio. The odds ratio indicates that the odds of FNP varieties scoring higher than conventional varieties (the probability of FNP varieties scoring higher over the probability that they do not) are 67%. In other words, FNP varieties are less likely to be preferred over conventional varieties on this trait. Farmers in treatment groups 1 and 2 also evaluated the different entries on good tassel formation, and here again FNP varieties scored substantially and significantly lower than their conventional counterparts, with a similar coefficient and odds ratio (67%). Interestingly, there were also differences between varieties, with the second variety scoring significantly better on pollen as well as on tassel. Still during the mid-season evaluation, FNP varieties scored significantly higher than conventional varieties on yield (coefficient of 0.269 or odds ratio of 1.31), indicating that farmers could observe the yield difference that FNP varieties generated and appreciated it. In the overall evaluation, FNP varieties scored better, although the coefficient was small compared to the differences between varieties.The results of the ordinal regression on the end-season evaluation show that, at this stage, participants did not distinguish between the tassels of FNP varieties and their conventional counterparts. On the other hand, the yield scores for the FNP varieties were substantially and significantly higher than those of the conventional varieties, as in the mid-season evaluation. However, the overall scores for the FNP varieties in the end-season were now substantially and significantly higher than those of their conventional counterparts (coefficient of 0.266 or odds ratio of 1.30).Finally, we repeated the same ordinal regression from Table 5 on all traits in the study, again with the varieties as co-factors, and sorted the coefficients for FNP vs. conventional varieties (the binary variable in the second row of Table 5). To visualize the results, we then mapped the coefficients to show how the FNP varieties were evaluated differently on these traits (Figure 3) at both the mid-season (Panel A) and the end-season (Panel B). The results show that at the mid-season, FNP varieties received better scores on most criteria. Still, the scores were only significantly higher for yield, stalk borer resistance, cob size, and barrenness levels. Still, in the mid-season, the FNP varieties received significantly lower scores for the two relevant traits: tassel and pollen formation. At the end-season evaluation, the FNP varieties scored substantially higher on almost all traits, but not for tassel and pollen formation.In 2018, the trials were repeated, again at eight sites but with two new ones. This time, eight varieties were included, each with and without FNP, with two replicates. Farmers evaluated all 16 entries, but only one replicate each, with a slightly extended list of traits (Table 2). The results The base category is V1 (KTN71-6/CML572). show that, unlike in 2017, participants in 2018 did not score the FNP entries lower for the amount of pollen shed and even scored them slightly higher for tassel formation (Figure 4). This was against expectations, but during the discussion with farmers at the end of the evaluation sessions, they explained that they remembered from last year that less tassel development and pollen shed were not negative traits. Further, during the same mid-season evaluation of 2018, FNP entries scored markedly higher on yield and overall evaluation compared to conventional varieties. The end-season evaluation of 2018 showed similar results, with no difference in pollen shed or tassel formation scores and significantly higher scores for yield and overall evaluation. The scores for all the traits were, however, much higher compared to the mid-season scores. This might imply that, at the end-season, these features were more developed, and farmers tended to give them higher scores. For a more robust statistical analysis, we again used the ordinal regression model with random effects (Table 6, first panel). The results confirmed that at the mid-season, the score for pollen was not now different for the FNP varieties, but the score for tassel formation was significant and positive, as were the scores for yield and overall. At the end-season, on the other hand, the scores for tassel and pollen were not significantly different between the FNP and the conventional varieties, but those for yield and overall evaluation were very different (Table 6, second panel).We repeated the analysis for all the traits in 2018 (Supplementary Material Fig. S6). Except for pollen and tassel, FNP varieties now scored significantly higher than conventional varieties for almost all traits, at both mid-and end-season evaluations. This shows that farmers could tell the difference between FNP varieties and conventional varieties and liked the FNP varieties better, or at least for the traits used in this evaluation.The study was specifically designed to obtain farmers' opinion on the FNP trait without drawing undue attention to relevant traits. Therefore, only farmers in the treatment groups were asked to evaluate pollen quantity (treatments 1 and 2) and tassel formation (treatment 2). To ascertain if the treatments drew attention to these particular traits, and away from other traits, we analyzed whether the assignment of participants to treatment or control groups affected their evaluation scores. As illustrated for the overall evaluation, we did not find a significant treatment effect on the scores (Table 7). There was no significant direct effect, meaning that treatment participants do not give different scores in general. There was also no significant cross effect, meaning that treatment participants did not give separate scores for FNP varieties. Analysis for the yield scores produced similar results. We also analyzed whether, by drawing attention to specific traits, the importance of these traits differed between treatment and control groups. In the stated importance scores, we did not find any differences between the groups. This is understandable, as farmers were asked this at the beginning of the field day, before they had observed the varieties in the field, and the traits for pollen and tassel were put at the end of the list. Therefore, we explored an alternative analysis by regressing the overall score on the scores for different traits (results for 2017 in Figure 5, for 2018 in Table 8). As the coefficients add up to about 1, they can be interpreted as the weight farmers give to the individual traits that are combined into giving an overall score.The results for the mid-season evaluation of 2017 show that in treatment 2, where participants were asked to score both pollen and tassel, the coefficient for pollen shed was significant. Still, the coefficient for good tassel formation was not (Figure 5). In treatment 1, where farmers were not asked about pollen, the coefficient for tassel formation was significant and, remarkably, almost equal to the coefficient for pollen in treatment 2. This suggests that farmers in treatment 1 were actually judging the varieties by the quantity of pollen shed (or combining the two traits) when evaluating the tassel formation. Adding the evaluation for tassel or pollen did affect the weights of the other traits. Still at the mid-season of 2017, this decreased the weight for yield, the most important trait, and brought the importance of good tassel formation (treatment 1) and amount of pollen shed (treatment 2) to a similar level as yield, as measured by the coefficients, which contrasted strongly with the stated importance (Figure 1). Similarly, at the end-season, the effect of the treatment was that good tassel formation became the second-most-important trait after yield. The effect of the treatment on other traits was, however, not consistent over the seasons.We repeated the analysis for the 2018 data (Table 8). Again, farmers in the treatment groups evaluated the different varieties for good tassel formation and pollen shed, while those in the control group did not. At the mid-season (Table 8, first panel), the coefficients for both good tassel formation and pollen shed were significant at 1%, but pollen shed was substantially higher (0.32) than tassel formation (0.19). Amount of pollen shed was the third most important trait after yield and early maturing. Adding the evaluations for tassel and pollen did affect the weights of the other traits; it decreased particularly the coefficients for yield, early maturing, cob size, and number of cobs and increased the coefficients for crop stand, stalk thickness, and biomass. During the endseason evaluation also, when farmers were asked to evaluate varieties for the tassel (treatment group), the evaluation score for tassels affected the overall score, substantively as well as significantly (Table 8, second panel). Good tassel formation became the most important trait, overtaking yield which in the control group (and in other studies as well) was always the most important trait. So even though farmers did not distinguish FNP from conventional varieties on tassel formation, the scores they gave to different varieties on this trait affected their overall evaluation.Finally, the analysis also revealed which criteria were important in farmers' overall evaluation, and how this differed from what they stated as important. Yield consistently received the highest coefficient (on average > 0.40), indicating that it contributed most to the overall evaluation (more than 40%) (Table 8). The only other trait that received a similar value was early maturity, but only at the mid-season evaluation. The next two traits were cob size and the number of cobs, receiving values of around 0.2, and both were strongly related to yield. These were followed by a range of traits receiving between 0.1 and 0.2, including height, resistance to diseases, germination, good tassel formation, and drought resistance. A range of other traits, while still significant, received lower values.This paper presents the analysis of an evaluation by farmers of FNP varieties compared with their conventional counterparts at the mid-season and the end-season over 2 years, using a 5-point Likert scale on a range of traits. The results show that when farmers are asked to evaluate maize varieties, they have a wide range of traits or criteria that they use, including tassel formation and pollen shed. Yield-related traits stand out as the most important, including yield, crop stand, cob size, and the number of cobs. Early maturity and drought resistance are also important. This was consistent at both mid-and end-season evaluations and in both years.At the mid-season evaluation in the first year, FNP varieties scored lower than their conventional counterparts for pollen shed and tassel formation, but higher for yield, cob size, and overall evaluation. This clearly showed that farmers could distinguish the FNP trait at the mid-season evaluation, but they still preferred the FNP varieties over the others because of higher scores on other criteria, including yield. At the end-season evaluation, however, tassel formation in FNP varieties no longer received a lower score, indicating that the trait was no longer observable at harvest. In the second year, at the mid-season evaluation, there was no significant difference for pollen shed and only a small one for tassel formation, for which FNP varieties now received a higher score. This indicated that farmers now understood the technology and its positive effects; this was also confirmed in the discussions with farmers afterwards. In the second year, FNP varieties generally received higher overall scores at both mid-season and end-season, clearly linked to higher scores for yield and related traits such as cob size, and a better overall outlook. This agrees with past studies that reported increased yield in hybrids segregating for male sterility by the use of the Ms44 gene (Fox et al., 2017;Loussaert et al., 2017). The results can be taken as an early indicator of acceptability, as long as the inclusion of the FNP trait leads to higher yields. As a secondary result, participants also scored three-way crosses higher than single crosses.Asking farmers about different criteria and including specific traits such as pollen and tassel were shown here to affect their evaluation, so this type of study needs to be carefully designed and its impacts analyzed, as demonstrated here. Farmers tend to state many traits as very important, For the mid-season, farmers in Treatment 1 were asked to evaluate the varieties for the same traits as the control farmers plus the trait 'good tassel formation'; farmers in Treatment 2 evaluated varieties on the same traits as those in Treatment 1 plus the trait 'amount of pollen shed'). In the end-season, as pollen shed could no longer be observed, the two treatment groups were merged, and treatment farmers evaluated the varieties for the same traits as control farmers plus the traits 'good tassel formation'.while not making much distinction between them. Regressing overall evaluation over evaluations of different individual criteria, however, shows a more nuanced story and indicates which traits really matter. However, including different traits, as seen when including pollen shed and tassel formation in the treatment groups, affects the weight of the other criteria.The method used here-asking farmers to score unnamed varieties on a range of traits or attributes on a 5-point Likert scale-is a convenient way to evaluate new maize technology, as has previously been shown for evaluating stress-tolerant varieties (Worku et al., 2020) and pest and soil fertility management (De Groote et al., 2010). The method has some limitations, in particular, that the scores are ordinal categorical data that should be analyzed with ordinal regression, and the results (log-odds ratio) are not easy to interpret. However, as we have shown here, the visual representation of average scores in combination with pair-wise t-tests gives similar, although not always equal, results that are much easier to understand. Also, the method does not allow to include other factors, in particular price, availability, and possibility of using farmer-saved seed. In the future, when conducting farmer evaluations of FNP varieties under farmer and market conditions, these factors can be included by estimating willingness to pay for seed with choice experiments or experimental auctions (Horna et al., 2007;Marenya et al., 2021).Our results also show that farmer evaluation of a large number of traits has limited value as the results tend to be highly correlated. Farmers do observe the tassel and pollen issues and are able to observe yield differences. However, when a variety looks good on yield and general appearance, this tends to affect their scores on other traits that are less easily observed. Further research is needed to see if farmers' positive evaluation of yield would also affect their evaluation of other traits that are not positively correlated with yield, such as early maturity for example. It would also be interesting to compare farmers' scores and physical observations of the same traits, to compare farmers' views with the actual crop performance and the breeders' objectives. A final limitation is that the evaluations were done on-farm but in researcher-managed trials, so additional evaluations under farmer conditions would be an important last step in the evaluation of FNP varieties.We conclude from our results that farmers' appreciation of FNP is positive and will likely not be a hindrance to the development and dissemination of FNP varieties in maize-based agricultural systems. The expected benefit from FNP varieties is ∼200 kg ha −1 . The production of FNP varieties will be driven by a novel hybrid production process using the dominant male sterile Ms44 gene and a maintainer line. This SPT will enable seed companies to produce high-quality hybrids without the need for detasseling and at a lower cost. Moreover, by incorporating the trait into selected new hybrids, the technology could help to increase the varietal turnover of maize hybrids, which is currently lagging in SSA. Therefore, the combined effects of increased yield and increased varietal turnover from FNP technology are likely to make a substantial impact on food production and food security in the maize-based agri-food systems of SSA. For a proper impact assessment of the technology, monitoring of the adoption of the technology by seed companies, the amount of FNP seed marketed, and the yield increase in farmers' fields remains essential. Supplementary Materials. Supplementary materials include the questionnaires for 2017 (SM1) and 2018 (SM2), the average scores for different traits in 2017 (SM3), the regression coefficients for the NFP trait for 2018 (SM4), and the decomposition of overall evaluation (regression on overall score on scores for specific traits). The data can be found in the repository and are available online (Collinson et al., 2021).For supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479723000054"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4726269630.json b/main/part_2/4726269630.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f87a790bef3f6bb80bcca33dbc5b97bf992eb17 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4726269630.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4e0eea58803c4b3769a083b96f174438","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/758659da-fd30-4ca1-b71b-b624affd6486/retrieve","id":"-849062481"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e87a461f-e32f-4362-886e-2d532a95e4db","content":"In Somaliland, the Minister of Livestock Dr. Idris Ibrahim Abdi kindly granted authorisation to conduct the review. Institutions that provided assistance for fi eld work include the Ministry of Livestock, Commerce and Industry and Finance; the municipalities of Hargeisa, Burao and Gabiley and other public bodies such as the Port Authority. Private institutions including the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture also provided signifi cant assistance. The Director of Veterinary Services Dr. Abdullahi Ahmed Hassan, the Berbera Port Veterinary Offi cer Dr. Ahmed Aibe Warsame, the Gabiley District Veterinary Offi cer Dr. Ahmed Hassan Bile and the Togdheer Regional Veterinary Coordinator Dr. Issa Nur Liban are gratefully acknowledged for their valuable assistance in implementing the fi eld activities. In Puntland the Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Environment Dr. Ibrahim Hared Ali Da'ar kindly granted permission to conduct the study. Several institutions provided assistance in the collection of information in the fi eld. They include the Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture and Environment, Commerce and Industry, Finance and Ports and Marine Resources; the municipalities of Galkayo and Las Anod; the Port Authority and the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture. There are specifi c individuals who took it upon themselves to ensure successful implementation of the survey, and their contributionList of Tables List of Figures 1. Introduction Appendix: Some of the facilities and services found in sampled markets in SomaliaList of Tables This report presents fi nding of a rapid appraisal of institutions supporting livestock trade and marketing in Somalia. Institutions were conceptualised to encompass the organisations (formal and informal) as well as rules, procedures, and practices either formal or informal that govern the functioning of these organisations. The appraisal identifi ed the key organisations supporting livestock trade and marketing in Somalia; evaluated the roles played by each organisation, identifi ed the rules and practices followed by these organisations in executing their functions and analysed the constraints they faced in carrying out their activities. The aim of the appraisal was to use the derived information to suggest interventions that would enable the organisations effectively perform their roles in improving livestock trade and marketing in Somalia. Emphasis was put on organisations involved in livestock marketing information fl ow, application of grades and standards in livestock products, and, livestock export promotion.Preliminary data was collected through in depth review of literature related to Somali livestock trade, which provided a baseline for designing the rapid appraisal. The main outcome of this review were three thematic maps of the principal market chains in Somalia, a catalogue of the market participants in key markets along the chains and a list of organisations that facilitate trade along these chains. This was followed by a rapid appraisal of the identifi ed organisations between November 2005 and January 2006 using a checklist of questions that targeted key personnel from the organisations. A separate checklist was developed for each organisation containing information on their activities, capacities and information fl ow related to livestock trade and constraints encountered in conducting business. Subsequently, workshops were organised for key personnel from some of the organisations in two of the principal marketing chains between April and December 2006 to identify the rules, practices and procedures guiding their operations and the level of adherence to these rules while facilitating livestock trade and marketing in Somalia.Data was analysed through examining, categorising, tabulating, and recombining evidence, to address the stated objectives. Within this strategy, three dominant analytic techniques were used: pattern matching, intuitive explanation building, and to a limited extent, time series analysis. These three dominant approaches were augmented with simple descriptive analysis where data was available.This study identifi ed eight forms of organisations supporting livestock export trade in Somalia, viz. brokers, veterinary services delivery systems, port authorities, livestock shipping fi rms, money transfer services, local government and regional administrations that were in-charge of livestock markets, central government, and a variety of private traders associations. These organisations supported the principal market participants: the smallscale traders, agents of exporters, and exporters in their endeavour to effectualise livestock export trade. The organisations operated under a set of rules and procedures that infl uenced their activities in facilitating livestock. However, it was noted that there was limited capacity to enforce adherence to some of the rules and regulations by these organisations.This appraisal recognized that although there exist informal grading system based on a number of attributes (age of animal, sex of animal, nutritional status, weight and size, breed and health status), none of the identifi ed institutions was engaged in overt activities to develop further and publicize application of these grades in livestock trade. This was noted to persist despite the general knowledge that suitable grading would signifi cantly promote trade.This appraisal also found out that there were no formal channels for disseminating marketing information (prices, quality attributes, volumes, etc) to support Somali livestock export trade.However, different organisations collected information that could be collated and aggregated into a suitable medium to form a basis for a formal livestock market information system.Information collected in this rapid appraisal may be important in guiding the setting up of a Livestock Market Information System (LMIS). The fi rst step in this direction would be to address the constraints that relevant institutions face in establishing an effective LMIS. Two key constraints were identifi ed. First, limited capacity, and secondly, lack of supporting infrastructure. Suitable staff will thus need to be trained in simple techniques like data collection and storage. Furthermore individual organisations will also need to enhance their infrastructural capacities, like acquisition of computers, software among others. In addition, deliberate policies should also be instituted to support networking and sharing of available information.Besides supporting the tasks that these institutions can play in fostering entrenchment of grades and standards in livestock trade, and in the establishment of a LMIS, another key area is in setting up of an internationally recognised health and safety certifi cation system. This role needs to be taken up by the public sector (government ministries, local authorities and regional administration). This appraisal established that currently, the main centre of attention of the public sector is at the ports of exit. In these ports, the government implements a rudimentary animal health certifi cation system, based on clinical inspection of animals prior to loading. There are also some instances of monitoring in some of the secondary markets. Implementation of an effective health and certifi cation system is constrained by limited capacity, both human and physical within the respective institutions and by the absence of a central veterinary administration that is recognised internationally. These constraints need urgent redress to guarantee participation in livestock export trade by Somali traders. It is important to note that a certifi cation system put in place should also be cost effective and easy to apply in order to be sustainable.Terra Nuova in partnership with the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) are implementing a three year project (Livestock Trade and Marketing Project -LTMP) that aims at improving and diversifying the Somali livestock trade and marketing. The project is grounded in the rationale that there is a considerably high but under exploited potential for reaping greater benefi ts from the Somali livestock sector, through an effi cient marketing system. This can be realised through improving the effi ciency of support services for livestock export trade.The project aims to contribute to the improvement of the Somali pastoral livelihoods by promoting access to improved marketing support services by Somali pastoralists and traders. These services should be provided by competent and self sustaining institutions.Institutions are defi ned here broadly to include organisation as well as complementary rules, procedures, practices and norms -both formal and informal. This will be realised through three results, namely:i. Quality control systems for livestock and livestock products devised and tested in three pilot marketing projects;ii. Rural institutions enabled to design, regulate and monitor livestock marketing support services and coordinate export trade of livestock and livestock products in three marketing chains; and,iii Competence of main providers of livestock marketing support services enhanced.Achievement of these results is hinged among other concerns on identifying and strengthening specifi c institutions to sustainably offer marketing support services to livestock export traders in Somalia..The broad objective of this study was to identify and undertake a rapid assessment of institutions that support livestock trade and marketing in Somalia. The specifi c objectives were:1. To identify institutions supporting livestock trade and marketing in Somalia.2. Evaluate the roles played by these institutions in facilitating:a. livestock trade and marketing information fl ow;b. application of grades and standards in livestock trade; c. livestock export marketing promotional activities.3. Assess the level of networking among these institutions while facilitating livestock export trade and marketing.4. Analyse constraints faced by these institutions in executing their activities.It was anticipated that this will be useful in designing supportive infrastructure to enable the institutions play an effective role in improving livestock trade and marketing in Somalia, through enhanced accountability and competence.A combination of different methodologies was employed in this study. At the onset, an in depth review of literature related to the Somali livestock trade was undertaken. This review provided a baseline on which the rapid appraisal and data collection was based.The key outputs of the literature review were three distinct thematic maps of the principal livestock marketing chains in Somalia, with the identifi cation of the market participants and supportive institutions along the chains. The rapid appraisal was then undertaken between November 2005 and January 2006 to enable an in-depth assessment of the different forms of organisations (either formal or informal), and an analysis of the roles performed by these organisations in facilitating livestock export trade. This rapid appraisal comprised of key informant interviews using a checklist of questions that targeted key personnel from the identifi ed organisations and individuals in the principal market chains. A checklist of questions was developed for each organisation containing information on their activities, capacities and information fl ow related to livestock trade and constraints encountered in conducting business. These data collection instruments were extensively discussed with local stakeholders to ensure that they would generate the desired information. Subsequently, workshops were then held between April and December 2006 bringing together representatives from some of the organisations in two of the principal market chains to identify and analyse the regulatory framework (rules and level of adherence to the rules) under which these organisations operate while providing livestock marketing support services in Somalia.Data analysis consisted of examining, categorising, tabulating, or otherwise recombining the evidence, to address the stated objectives. This type of analysis is diffi cult because these strategies and techniques have not been well defi ned and developed (Yin, 1990). Nevertheless, every investigation started with a general analytic strategy, yielding priorities for what to analyse and why. Within this strategy, three dominant analytic techniques were used: pattern matching, intuitive explanation building, and to a limited extent, time series analysis (focusing on the monthly activities for the twelve months preceding December 2005). These three dominant approaches were augmented with simple descriptive analysis where data was available. Information generated was presented in tables, pie-charts and graphs.Middle East and Kenya are the principal destinations for Somali animals. These are served by three chains, the Kenya export trade, the Bossaso export trade and the Berbera export trade chains, which were therefore selected. However, these systems are not totally independent of each other. Berbera and Bossaso export ports deal with export of live cattle, goats, sheep and camels to the Middle East market including Yemen, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Bahrain, North Africa Egypt and Libya. On the other hand, the Garissa market serves the Kenya market only for cattle. Garissa itself is located within Kenya and it was chosen as the export point because there is no formal export point or port on the Somali-Kenya long border serving the Kenya market. Animals are assembled in Garissa for onward movement to various Kenyan market destinations (Nairobi, Thika, Mombasa, Mwingi, Kitui, Machakos, etc.). The map showing all the market chains is given in Figure 1.Each export port is served by a set of domestic market channels connecting a number of secondary markets, staging points, and further linking to several primary markets. At both primary and secondary markets, there may be overlap between different market chains as animals from the same geographical area may serve different chains. Furthermore, the nomadic nature of production requiring seasonal movement according to rainfall and weather changes and pasture availability means that a given area may supply different market chains in different seasons. With the exception of secondary markets, municipalities and regional administrations, all the other organisations that were identifi ed along the different marketing chains are given in Table 1 and all the organisations were interviewed. For markets, purposive sampling was used and this was based on: (i) species of livestock traded, (ii) accessibility, and, (iii) security. A total of six workshops bringing together stakeholders from some of the organisations along the Berbera and Bossaso livestock export chains were held in Hargeisa and Garowe between April and December 2006. Three workshops were held for each chain targeting both public and private sector organisations. These chains were chosen as it was relatively easy to bring together representative from most of the identifi ed organisations in order to deliberate on the existing regulatory framework supporting livestock marketing in Somalia. The workshops conducted using various approaches that included plenary presentation that explained to the participants the key concepts that were to focus the participants on issues at hand, group discussions, and plenary presentations of group work.3.1. Structure of the export-livestock marketing system in SomaliaThis rapid appraisal established that the market structure of Somali livestock export trade comprises of Petty traders, Agents of Exporters, and Exporters. Transactions between these participants are facilitated by brokers. The concentration of each of these market participants varies from market to market depending on its size and location. However, brokers comprise of the largest ratio of participants in most of the livestock markets in Somalia (Table 2). Based on an assessment by Stockbridge (2004), the roles of these livestock trade market participants include:Petty traders comprise of the 'Gedisley' and the 'Gadley'. The Gedisley are those traders who buy animals in one market and sell them to another market in order to exploit price differentials between the two markets. The Gedisley may also try to add value to purchased animals through supplementary feeding and treatment. Many traders who are described as Gedisley operate at a local level, moving animals from village markets to larger markets in the same district or region or even other larger markets in other regions. In some areas such as Somaliland, the term Jeeble is used instead of Gedisey. On the other hand, the Gadley are those traders who buy animals from a market and resale them in the market at a profi t. The Gadley typically operate on a smaller scale than the Gedisley, and may keep the animals for just a few days, or even hours. Like the Gedisley, the Gadley may at times engage in activities that add value to their animals.Agents are market participants who supply animals in response to orders or requests from actors further up the supply chain. They source and transfer animals on behalf of their clients based on an established rapport and trust. In some cases, agents may also act independently by using their funds and thus trading as Gedisley in addition to their role as agents.Exporters are traders who act as the fi nal link in the chain between the Somali livestock marketing system and the importing country. They assemble livestock from different regions of Somalia and transport them to destination countries and arrange for their sale.An analysis of the performance and conduct of these participants was beyond the scope of this appraisal.The following institutions were identifi ed as playing a signifi cant role in supporting livestock export trade and marketing in Somali:Brokers, also known as the 'Dilaal' or 'Dallaal', are a central feature of livestock marketing in Somalia. They are based in main markets and play pivotal role in all transactions that are concluded in these markets. Figure 2 shows the concentration of brokers relative to other market participants in selected secondary markets.Brokers facilitate exchange between other traders and there is a broker in every transaction in the market. Price is discovered through bargaining between a buyer and seller through the facilitation of a broker. Besides facilitating exchange, brokers play the important role of guaranteeing that the livestock being traded is not stolen. They also facilitate in settling of other disputes and in some markets; they contribute to provision of security. More often than not, brokers require a licence to operate and derive their payment from a charge levied on every transaction they facilitate in the market. This levy varies from one species to another, being lower for small ruminants (μ = 0.47 US$ per head) and highest for camels (μ = 3.53 US$/head) and also from one market to another (Figure 3). This rapid appraisal could however not establish whether the conduct of the different market participants acted to advance or impinge on the performance of the livestock marketing system. For example, one may hypothesise that Brokers increase the cost of marketing, thereby reducing the profi ts of both livestock producers and traders. Alternatively, brokerage activity may actually be increasing incomes to some market participants, particularly those who may be disadvantaged with regard to inadequate information on market prices. Furthermore, brokers may act to reduce risks associated with trade (property rights and contractual enforcement) particularly in a system that are lacking in formal insurance institutions.These are organisations which are either formal or informal and whose activities are largely geared towards improving trader's welfare. They exploit the concept of collective action and social capital 2 in order to pull resources together in offering services like: (i) supplying marketing infrastructure (like loading rumps); (ii) provision of capital (loans) to fi nance 2 Social capital is an instantiated informal norm that promotes cooperation between two or more individuals and is overtly actualized in day to day dealings between the individuals. By this defi nition, trust, networks, civil society (like these trader organisations), and the like which have been associated with social capital are all epiphenomenal, arising as a result of social capital but not constituting social capital itself (Fukayama, 1999). Establishment of a livestock committee that meets every two weeks to deliberate on existing livestock concerns.Since these organisations largely operates on the concept of social capital, they are likely to experience reduced transaction costs that is usually associated with formal coordination mechanisms like contracts, hierarchies, and bureaucratic rules. In this regard, they are likely to render themselves useful for strengthening as low-cost service delivery vehicles to livestock traders in the Somali marketing system.There are four major ports in Somalia, all which used to fall under Somali Ports Authority: Mogadishu, Berbera, Kismayo and Bossaso. The fi rst three are deepwater ports; although the latter is the fastest growing port in Somalia. All of these ports now fall under independent port authorities set up by local governments 3 . The same applies to the smaller ports such as El Ma'an and Merka. Due to civil instability and inter-clan fi ghting Mogadishu is not operational, but Kismayo is still used by commercial operators to some extent. Pirating of vessels is common in Somali waters; reckoned to be the most dangerous waters in the world and few foreign registered ships are willing to dock. Since May 2005 a total of 27 ships have been hijacked and thereafter being used for hijacking additional ships within Somali territorial waters (WFP, 2005).Due the existing fl uid security situation, only two ports, Bossaso and Berbera were offering services to livestock export traders in Somalia during the time the rapid appraisal was undertaken. Services and facilities offered include:i Marshal yards 3 However, at the time of the survey the TFG had not yet established its authority on the Mogadishu and Kisimayo port.ii Tugboat facilitiesiii Cranes for loading livestock iv Fenced enclosures v Loading ramps vi Custom facilitiesIt is located on the south coast of the Gulf of Aden along the NW Somali coast -Somaliland/ Galbeed (Saheel) region -about 250 kms east of Djibouti. The port was built in a natural bay formed by a low-lying sand bar with the entrance to the west. The port was developed by Russian and American aid, and the berths are distinguished between Russian and American wharves. Each one is approximately 325 metres although the Russian portion was built 30 years prior to the American, which was built in 1986. It is presently the largest operating port of Somalia. The port operates all year round and is the primary source of revenue for the administration of Somaliland and the largest employer generating direct and indirect employment opportunities (410 permanent employees, about the same number of contractual workers and approximately 900 stevedores and casual workers). Revenue from Customs duties and tariffs from the port consist a major component of the budgetary income of the local administration. Livestock is the main export cargo comprising of about 25% of port business. The trend in the number of livestock exported through this port is shown in Figures 3. About 60% of the populations' livelihood depends either directly or indirectly on the livestock and its products. Imports through the port of Berbera are destined for Somaliland, Ethiopia, North Eastern Somalia and parts of Southern Somalia.(ii) Bossaso Port (Puntland)It is located on the south coast of the Gulf of Aden along the NE Somali coast -Puntland. Bossaso is a relatively new port. Most of vessel traffi c and sea trade through Bossaso port is carried by dhows that comprised of about 82% of total vessels in 2004. . The port of Bossaso is the most important source of economic and social development for the administration of Puntland, which can be seen, by the rapid development of Bossaso town and its environs. The port is a major contributor to the economy of the Bari region and Puntland's stability on the whole. Livestock is one of the main export commodities with the main destinations being in the Gulf region. (iii) Constraints faced by livestock traders in using the Bossaso and Berbera portsDuring the rapid appraisal, several constraints were listed as limiting livestock export trade through the Somali ports. These constraints and their suggested solutions are listed in Table 2. This port is located along the Indian Ocean on the South coast of Somalia, Benadir Region. Mogadishu port was the most active port that served commercial civilian, humanitarian and military purposes in Somalia. At the time of the survey, there were inter-clan fi ghting over the control of the port and thus it was closed for security reasons. Cargo destined for South and Central Somalia was being routed through the ports of Merka (100km south of Mogadishu) and El Ma'an (30km north of Mogadishu).It is located along the Indian Ocean on the south coast of Somalia -Lower Juba region -it was one of the four major ports of Somalia playing a major role in the development of southern Somalia. Presently, Kismayu is one of the export points of charcoal and to a lesser extent one of the import points of vehicles from the Gulf. The port can accommodate vessels up to 180 metres in length with a maximum draft of about 8 metres. It has 2 berths measuring 340 metres and 280 metres respectively and 2 roll on roll off ramps.The port is located along the Indian Ocean on the south coast of Somalia -Lower Shabelle region -about 100kms south of Mogadishu. Clans who have vested interests in keeping the port of Mogadishu closed control the Port. The Port has no infrastructure or facilities and vessels discharge from their anchorage offshore where cargo is either picked up by barges or smaller vessels for beaching. From the beach, cargo is picked up by trucks and delivered by road.It is located along the Indian Ocean on the south coast of Somalia -Middle Shabelle region -45km North of Mogadishu. It is a naturally protected port, which is currently run by Benadir Maritime and local port operations as a consortium. Most shipments are made to Mombasa and thereafter trans-shipped and sent to El Ma'an.The institution of veterinary services delivery is essential to livestock export trade since it determines the quality of response to emergency livestock health concerns and to the ability of a country to offer livestock health services, and livestock product certifi cation for export.Based on FAO (2000), these services comprises of: (i) the veterinary administration that encompasses veterinary service that has authority in the whole country for implementing, supervising and auditing animal health measures and international veterinary certifi cation processes which the OIE recommends; and, (ii) the veterinary authority that include the veterinary service (VS), under the authority of the veterinary administration, which is directly responsible for the application of animal health measures in a specifi ed area of the country. The veterinary authority may also have responsibility for the issuing or the supervision of the issuing of international veterinary certifi cates in that area. Services are offered by offi cial veterinarians, who include those authorised by the veterinary administration of the country to perform certain designated offi cial tasks associated with animal health and/or public health and inspections of commodities and, when appropriate, to certify in conformity with the provisions of the OIE Code. These veterinarians may be supported by para-professional (i.e., a person authorized by the veterinary statutory body to carry out certain designated tasks, dependent upon the category of veterinary para-professional, and delegated to them under the responsibility and direction of a veterinarian). The tasks authorized for each category of Veterinary para-professional should be defi ned by the veterinary statutory body depending on qualifi cations and training, and according to need.There exists veterinary administration and veterinary authorities in Somaliland, Puntland and Southern Somalia under the respective ministries of livestock. However, the authority in Somaliland is not recognised internationally (Somaliland, 2006). The same applies to Puntland. It was noted during the rapid appraisal that these veterinary authorities face severe human resource constraints to the extent that they can not effectively perform their respective roles, particularly regarding risk analysis as recommended by the OIE. It was diffi cult to establish the current establishment within the whole Somali veterinary health care system (public and private), although this fi gure was said to be quite low in comparison to the size of the national livestock herd. For example, the Somaliland National Veterinary Association (SoLNAVA) has only 63 members of whom 10 are Veterinarians, 51 Veterinary assistants, and two veterinary auxiliaries (Somaliland, 2006). The results of the rapid survey indicate that the services offered by veterinary services in support of livestock export trade are limited to:i Clinical examination of livestock en-route from primary markets to terminal ports of exit (by veterinary personnel located along the marketing chain)ii Clinical examination and certifi cation of the animals as disease free (based on this diagnosis) (offered by the port veterinary offi cer)iii Examination and certifi cation livestock shipment vesselsThe port veterinary offi ce is one of the prominent components of the veterinary delivery services in Somalia. The specifi c services offered by the port veterinary offi ce (in Bossaso and Berbera) are summarised in Table 4. From Table 4, it can be observed that if the market chain is unable to screen for disease, it is likely that animals will stay longer at the port before the certifi cation is granted. This in essence will have an impact on the marketing costs accruing to the exporter in terms of feed and possible deterioration of body condition. The charges levied by the port veterinary offi ce for certifi cation of different species are shown in Figure 6. The Figure indicates that health certifi cation charges for cattle and camels at the port of Bossaso are much higher than those in Berbera. Some of the constraints and suggested interventions for the improvement of the services of the port veterinary offi ces are listed in Table 5. Based on Table, one may intuitively conclude that the performance of the veterinary port would be enhanced through investments in both human and physical capital. Other interventions that may have implications on trader marketing costs include: (i) the relocation of the holding grounds from town to the outlying hinterland areas, which might result not only in reducing congestion at the port (leading to loss of conditions of animals), but also contribute to lower feed costs and accessibility by the traders; and, (ii) acquisition of suitable shipping vessels that may have higher carrying capacities and thus lowers per-head costs and contribute to observing of proper animal welfare.Several private sector players providing services to livestock export traders at a profi t were identifi ed. They include: i Livestock shipping companies. Table 6 summarises the charges levied to livestock traders and navigation days to destination ports by some of the companies surveyed during this study.ii Livestock transporters (from secondary markets to ports of exit)iii Money transfer agencies iv Livestock feed sellers v Livestock markers and rope vendors Several constraints were identifi ed as limiting the capacity of these private sector entities to provide effective and appropriate services to livestock traders. These include:Insecurity along stock routes and in international waters surrounding Somalia Lack of supporting insurance schemesLack of international recognition of the existing governments in Somalia statesDisorganisation and confusion in rules and regulations governing export trade in SomaliaThese constraints arise principally due to the limited capacity of the public sector in provision of a conducive operating environment. The services provided by the public sector, where they exist, are limited to provision of security in designated market places and in offering administrative services at the ports.From the information in Table 6, it can be observed it takes up to 9 days to arrive at some destinations, and thus there is need to invest in suitable carrier vessels to ensure that welfare of animals in terms of feed, water and other requirements is adhered to and limit losses in shipment arising from death and loss of condition.Together with other stakeholder, the regional administration and municipalities coordinates provision of facilities and services in specifi c markets. Such facilities include fencing enclosures, holding grounds, veterinary clinic, fodder sellers, animal markers, veterinary drug vendors, animal transporters, among other facilities. A summary of the facilities available in the surveyed markets is given in the Appendix. In turn, it levies some charges in using these facilities. These charges vary from one species to another. The charges are uniform i.e., US$ 0.6, 0.2 and 0.8 for cattle, shoats, and camels respectively in Somaliland, but varies from one market to another for markets in Puntland (Table 7). In addition, some of the municipalities also register and licence traders and brokers operating in markets under their jurisdiction, and also collect data on transactions being undertaken in the markets. Information collected includes:Price paidThis information is collected by clerks and is stored in books. It was reported that such records are used in safeguarding revenue collection and solving ownership disputes should they arise at a later date. Several government ministries were identifi ed as playing a role that infl uences livestock trade in Somalia. A summary of these roles is given in Table 8. The Table indicated that the main focus of the public sector in livestock trade is in the administration and management of ports for purposes of tax collection, and in provision of rudimentary animal health certifi cation system based upon a clinical observation of animals before loading. This system of inspection has been accepted by Oman, Yemen and U.A.E only. Details on levels of different costs incurred by traders while operating from the two ports are given in Table 9. However, the rapid appraisal established the expressed desire of the public sector, particularly the ministry of livestock to undertake the following:Formalise and publicise the existing grading standards for livestock for export.Offer training and provide research and extension services in all areas of livestock production and trade.Promote Somali livestock and livestock products in existing export markets and search for new export market opportunities.Formulate sectoral policies guidelines for meat inspection, inspection of imported livestock products, quarantine of imported animals, public health and food hygiene, and policies to support other forms of agriculture e.g. dairy, poultry and bee keeping.3.3 Role of the organisations in supporting the informal grading and standard system in the Somali livestock export tradeThis rapid survey established the existence of an informal grades and standard system for cattle, sheep and goats practiced within the Somali livestock marketing system. The informal grading is based on a number of attributes:Age of animal;Sex of animal;Nutritional status;Weight and size;Breed (in case more than one breed exists); and, Health status. It was observed that in there exists a three-point grading system (Grade I, II, and III) practiced in cattle trade based on the nutritional score of the animal, ceteris paribus. No such precise grading system was observed in sheep and goats. This appraisal intuitively concluded that this grading system has evolved in response to the demands in the export markets. An assessment of how these specifi c attributes interact to infl uence the price of an animal was beyond the scope of this rapid appraisal. The same applies to the evaluation of the extent to which different categories of traders are aware of these grades, and to what extent they apply them in their daily trading activities. However, no organisation was identifi ed to be engaging in overt activities to support application of these grades in livestock trade. However, there was a general consensus among market actors that grading of export quality livestock will enhance livestock export trade with existing trading partners and with other countries. This will be attained through:Fetching better prices;Contributing to more stable prices;Make dealings with trading partners easy by supplying the standards demanded by the importers; reducing inspection needs and therefore transaction costs;Obtaining the confi dence of importing countries. Tables 10 and 11 indicate that both public and private sector institutions can play a signifi cant role in collection and provision of information on livestock trade. Activities of these institutions can thus be harnessed to provide a base on which to build a livestock marketing information system (LMIS) that would support export trade in Somalia. However, it was observed that there was no institution that collected and made accessible information on livestock grades and standards, and how they related to price. Furthermore, information on the demand condition in importing countries was available mainly from exporters. This study thus intuitively concluded that exporters may exploit this information asymmetry to their advantage when buying livestock for export from the local market.It was noted that some of the information collected on livestock trade is used for various functions as shown in Table 12. The Table indicates that information collected on livestock market transactions is largely used to facilitate revenue collection and in dispute resolution and not as a basis for formulating strategies that would support livestock trade in Somalia. This information is recorded in books either by the regional administration, municipal councils or veterinary personnel operating in the markets. The specifi c details on the information collected vary from market to market. Different organisations were noted to perform different activities aimed at promoting livestock export trade within Somalia. Some of the specifi c activities undertaken are summarised in Table 13. • Setting up of supportive infrastructure: i.e., helping in the establishment of Dayah Islamic Bank in Bossaso. This bank helps in enhancing trade and transparency between Somalia and the importing countries.During the stakeholder workshop, in Garowe (Puntland) and Hargeisa (Somaliland) the following rules and regulations were identifi ed as regulating livestock export trade:i. Quarantine at the entry and exit points. All livestock entering or leaving the country need to be quarantined. These requirements are stipulated in the Quarantine Act.ii. Livestock destined for export must be mature animals so that the breeding stock can be protected to prevent depletion iii. Only male animals are to be exported across the seas iv. Inspection certifi cate must be issued at the primary markets before the animals are transported to the secondary markets and Berbera port for export v. Only appropriate vehicles that adhere to specifi c designated standards are to be used for livestock transport vi. Livestock trade should only be undertaken in designated areas. These requirements are stipulated in the Local Government Act. The same act also determines the levies and fees to be charged in the market facilities. Transit letters are issued to traders after fulfi lling the requirements of the act. The act also facilitates proper sanitation within the municipalities in collaboration with the Ministry of Health through the Public Health act.vii. A movement permit must be issued according to the animal health act before the animals are transported to the port of exit i.e. Berbera.viii. Livestock exporters must be licensed according to the relevant act to be allowed to operate. Only citizens can be given licences.ix. Trader permit that is validated must be issued by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry before one is allowed to operate.x. The customs act facilitates the collection of fees and levies by relevant bodies and ministries that include MoL, Finance, Commerce and Industry and the Chamber of CommerceThe main constraints facing trader associations in expanding services available to traders included limited physical and human resources. Suggested solutions to these constraints are shown in Table 14. Increase trips abroad e.g. to Sudan and Ethiopia to initiate bi-lateral trade discussions that would create links for different products and strengthen ties with importers Capacity building among government staff for effective deliver of services i.e. training of all veterinary personnel in computers Establish appropriate banking system to allow use of letter of credit for livestock marketing transactions It was also noted in the workshops that the rules and regulations governing livestock trade were not being suffi ciently enforced. The constraints, opportunities and solutions in reference to enforcement of the regulatory procedures in livestock marketing are summarised in Table 16.Need to rehabilitate infra-structures after evicting the private invaders. This study was conducted with the main intention of identifying and undertaking a rapid assessment of the functioning of institutions that support livestock trade and marketing in Somalia. Specifi cally, it was expected that information generated would be valuable in formulating supportive policy that would facilitate the institutions play an effective role in improving livestock trade and marketing in Somalia. The study commenced with an indepth review of literature related to the Somali livestock trade, which provided a baseline on which a rapid appraisal and data collection was based. The rapid appraisal focussed on evaluating the different forms of organisations and analysing their roles in facilitating livestock export trade. Collected data was analysed by examining, categorising, tabulating, and recombining the evidence, using three main analytic techniques, viz pattern matching, intuitive explanation building, and time series analysis. These methods were supported with limited descriptive analysis. Generated results were presented in tables, pie-charts and graphs. Subsequently, workshops were also held to identify the rules and regulations shaping the functioning of these organisations in executing their roles in livestock export trade.This study identifi ed eight organisations/individuals supporting livestock export trade in Somalia. These include: This appraisal established that although there exist informal grading system based on a number of attributes (age of animal, sex of animal, nutritional status, weight and size, breed and health status), and that in cattle and small ruminants three point grading system (Grade I, II, & III) is in use, none of the identifi ed organisations was engaged in explicit activities to articulate and disseminate application of these grades in livestock trade. This exists despite the general consensus that grading of export quality livestock would enhance livestock export trade with existing trading partners and with other countries reducing also transaction costs (especially reduced quality inspection costs). Therefore before engaging in activities that would popularise and disseminate this grading approach, it would be important to establish how knowledge on this informal grading system is distributed along the marketing chains, how these grades infl uence prices received, and whether these grades evolved in response to the demand situations in importing countries.This study also found out that there were no planned formal channels for disseminating marketing information (prices, quality attributes, volumes, etc) to support Somali livestock export trade. However, different organisations collected information that could be collated and aggregated into a suitable medium to form a basis for a formal livestock market information system. Establishing an effective livestock market information system that serves both the public and private sectors is critical to the improvement of the operational effi ciency of livestock marketing in Somalia.Information collected in this rapid appraisal may be suffi cient in guiding the establishment of a LMIS, without seeking additional information from formal studies. The fi rst step in this direction would be to address the constraints that relevant institutions face in setting up of an effective LMIS. Two key constraints were identifi ed, fi rst, limited capacity within the organisations, and secondly, lack of supporting infrastructure. Suitable staff in these organisations will thus need to be educated on simple techniques like data collection and storage, whereas the organisations will need to enhance their infrastructural capacities, like acquisition of modern facilities like computers. In addition, deliberate policies should then be instituted to support networking and sharing of available information.Besides promoting the roles that these institutions can play in fostering entrenchment of grades and standards, and in the establishment of a LMIS, another key area is in setting up of a recognised health and safety certifi cation system, a role that needs to be taken up by the public sector (Government Ministries). This appraisal established that at the moment, the main focus of the public sector is at the ports of departure, particularly Bossaso and Berbera. In each of these ports, the government implements a rudimentary animal health certifi cation system, based upon clinical inspection of animals prior to loading. There are also some instances of monitoring in some of the secondary markets. Implementation of an effective health and certifi cation system is constrained by limited capacity, both human and physical within the respective institutions and by the absence of a central veterinary authority that is recognised internationally. These constraints need urgent attention to ensure predictability and guaranteed participation in livestock export trade by Somali traders. It is important to point out that a certifi cation system put in place should be cost effective as an incentive to effective implementation. Above all mechanisms should be put in place to increase compliance to the laid down rules and regulations that govern livestock export trade."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4748768244.json b/main/part_2/4748768244.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a5860d5e0da31dc1f25067e4d69dea5253a064d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4748768244.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3ae4f0a6a7c360e272fb7c3c184f7451","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b9fc8fdb-1537-4fbe-aa6b-53212ef265f1/content","id":"903517384"},"keywords":["Hub Manager","CSISA Haryana hub Cropping Systems Agronomist","CIMMYT Bangladesh Y.S. Saharawat : Senior Soil Scientist","IARI","New Delhi"],"sieverID":"26bb5f45-e77b-4982-8df1-c6d5539ae3cc","content":"The Cereals Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) is mandated to enhance farm productivity and increase incomes of resource-poor farm families in South Asia through the accelerated development and inclusive deployment of new varieties, sustainable management technologies, partnerships and policies. The project is being implemented by the CGIAR institutions; IRRI, CIMMYT, IFPRI and ILRI and supported by USAID, and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. © This publication is a product of Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) and copyrighted to the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) and International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) 2012 and is licensed for use under a Creative Commons Attribution -Non Commercial ShareAlike 3.0 License (Unported).The designations employed and the presentations of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion of any option what so ever on the part of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) and the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) concerning the legal status of any country, person, territory, city, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Where trade names are used, this does not constitute endorsement of or discrimination against any product by CIMMYT and IRRIOperational Manual for Multi-Crop Zero Till PlanterMultiple challenges associated with plough based conventional production practices that include deteriorating natural resources, declining factor productivity, shortages of water & labor and escalating costs of production inputs coupled with challenges of climate change both in irrigated intensive systems as well as low intensity rainfed ecologies are the major threat to food security of South Asia (Jat et al., 2009;Ladha et al., 2009;Chauhan et al., 2012). Water and labor scarcity and timeliness of farming operations specially planting under the emerging uncertainties are becoming major concerns of farming all across farmer typology, production systems and ecologies in the region (Chauhan et al., 2012). In many parts of Asia, over-exploitation and poor management of groundwater has led to declining table and negative environmental impacts. Conventional flooded rice receiving the largest amount of fresh water compared to any other crop is the major contributor to the problems of declining groundwater table ranging from 0.1-1.0 m year -1 and increasing energy use. The problem has further been intensified with the unavailability of labor in time, and multi-fold increase in labor costs. Fragmented land holdings and nucleus farm families further exacerbates the problem of availability of farm labour.Potential solutions to address these issues include a shift from intensive tillage based practices to conservation agriculture (reduced or no tillage) based crop establishment techniques (Saharawat et al., 2010;Jat et al., 2012;Gathala et al., 2011). Direct drilling (seeding/planting with zero tillage technology) is one such practice that potentialy addresses the issues of labor, energy, water, soil health etc (Malik et al., 2005;Gupta and Sayre, 2007;Jat et al., 2009;Ladha et al., 2009;Gathala et al., 2011). However, due to fragmented and small land holdings it is not affordable to purchase many machines for the sowing of different crops. Therefore, multi-crop planter have been invented and are being used by many farmers across South Asia. The same multi-crop planter available in the region can be used for direct drilling of several crops including wheat, rice, maize, moongbean, mustard, barley etc without any preparatory tillage and also under reduced tillage situations. One of the major constraints in large scale adoption of this technology as well as sub-optimal use of planters is the lack of skills/knowledge on operation and calibration of the machinery for multiple uses. There are different field/ crop/situation specific adjustments needed before the use of the machine in the field. These adjustments include proper seeding depth, fertilizer rate and the seed rate etc as per the crop and field conditions to realize the potential benefits of the technology. There are several machinery manufacturers who supply these planters but the operational manuals are not available for making adjustments, calibrations for multiple purposes, multiple crops under local conditions. In absence of the manual guidelines/protocols for efficient use of these planters by the farmers, service providers, extension agents for different purposes and variable field conditions, many a times the desirable results are not achieved and even contradictory results are observed. This results in slowing down the adoption rates of the technology. Also, in absence of simple guidelines for maintenance of these planters, the farmers/service providers need to make huge investments on repairing at the start of the season. In this manual, we attempted to provide simple guidelines for calibration, operation, maintenance and troubleshooting for efficient use of multi-crop zero till planters by the range of stakeholders including farmers, service providers, extension agents and researchers.Due to fragmented and small land holdings and variable farmer typology, it is neither affordable not advisable to purchase many machines for the planting of different crops by the same farmer. The multi-crop planter can plant different crops with variable seed size, seed rate, depth, spacing etc., providing simple solution to this. In addition to adjustments for row spacing, depth, gears for power transition to seed and fertilizer metering systems, the multi-crop planters have precise seed metering system using inclined rotary plates with variable grove number and size for different seed size and spacing for various crops. This provides flexibility for use of these planters for direct drilling of different crops with precise rate and spacing using the same planter which does not exist in flutted roller metering drills. Hence, the same multi-crop planter can be used for planting different crops by simply changing the inclined plates. The planter can also be used to make the beds and simultaneously sowing the crop just by mounting the shovels and shapers which can be easily accomplished due to the given provision in the machine. The planter has the provision of drilling both seed and fertilizer in one go. Also, as seed priming is very important for good germination and optimum plant population, the multi-crop planters provides opportunity to use primed seeds which is not possible in flutted roller metering drills.The multi-crop planter primarily consists of 10 components as depicted in Figure 1 and described in below sectionThe frame of multi-crop planter consists of 2 or 3 bars made up of mild steel on which all other parts are mounted/ attached. The frame works as a body in the planter. The bars are made up of mild steel angle irons (6.5 × 6.5 × 0.5 cm) welded together to provide the desired strength and rigidity. The frame of the 9-tyne planter is of the size of 185 × 60 cm while the frame of 11 tyne machine is 220 cm long. The tynes are attached to the frame which is used to drill the soil. Tynes are attached by U-Clamping as shown in Figure 2. Mainly 9 tynes or 11 tynes are fitted at desired spacing (equal or paired row arrangements) depending on crop. These U-shaped clamps can be unbolted to change the distance between furrow openers, no. of furrow openers and also to detach the furrow openers in order to attach some other part for a different function, for example shovel cum shaper assembly may be attached for raised bed planting. A 4 cm wide, 5 cm thick and 6 cm long stiffener plate is provided at back bottom of the inverted T-type furrow opener (5.0 × 1.2 cm) which is attached to the frame with nuts and bolts or directly with clamps. The furrow opener is welded to the mild flat steel shank (straight leg standard mounted with T-type furrow opener). The blades can be of \"welded on\" or \"bolted on'' or even \"knock down\" type. The disadvantage of \"welded on\" blades is that they require machine shop for replacement, whereas, a farmer can himself replace the other two types of blades. The quality of material used to make the furrow openers will ultimately decide the operational quality and durability of the planter. Double boot is provided behind each furrow opener to receive a tube (steel ribbon or polyethylene tube with a minimum diameter of 25 mm) each to host seed and fertilizer delivery pipes. The furrow openers are adjusted to make 3-5 cm wide slits.Trapezoidal shaped seed and fertilizer boxes, made of mild steel sheet (2 mm thick), are mounted side by side (fertilizer box in front and seed box in the rear) on the frame (Figure 4). The boxes are generally 180 cm long and 24 cm deep. Box dimensions can vary depending upon the effective width of the machine and will increase with the increase in the number of the furrow openers. For example in case of 9-tine planter, the length of seed and fertilizer boxes will be around 160 cm.The seed metering and delivery system (Figure 5) consists of following-1. Seed box : it is used to store the seed in the planter 2. Inclined rotary metering plates : these rotating plates have grooves which guide the seed and drop it in to the cups (Figure 6)3. Seed metering strip : it is an iron bar which has holes in it. By changing the hole, we can change the rate of the seed to be planted in the field. The seed rate is written on the strip with the corresponding holes (Figure 8) 4. Seed Cups : These cups receive seeds that are dropped by the inclined rotary plates and then dispense the seeds to the seed delivery pipe. These seed cups must be smooth and free from any obstacle from the inside to ensure unobstructed delivery of the seeds (Figure 7).It is used to take the seed from cups to the seed boot.6. Seed boot : Seed boot finally drops the seed into the slit in the soil opened by the furrow opener.The seed metering strip is mounted on the seed box. It is attached to the seed box in such a manner that the seed box is tilted when there is an adjustment on the system. It is a strip of iron on which equally spaced holes are provided. The holes connect the strip to the seed box with the help of nut. By changing the holes, the seed rate can be adjusted. The seed rate is generally written on the corresponding hole. However, these are just indicative and for actual quantity of seed to be delivered, it is always advisable for field calibration. The seed rate may also be adjusted by putting the chain on different gears (Figure 9). Using the gear with lesser teeth will lower down the seed rate and vice-versa. There are different seed metering inclined plates for different crops as shown in Figure 10. The plates vary from each other in size of groove, number of grooves and shape of the grooves. The size, number and shape of the grooves are designed to suit the specific crops.To change the plates, the nut in the center of the plate is opened and then after changing the plate it is tightened again. Fertilizer metering system controls the amount of fertilizer application in the field. Generally there are two types of fertilizer metering system (Figure 11). In the flutted rollers metering systems (Figure 12), the fertilizer rate is adjusted with the help of the lever (Figure 14). The lever is set to the recommended fertilizer level. Before setting the fertilizer rate by the lever the nut as shown in figure 13 is loosened and after adjusting the level it is tightened again. However, for precise fertilizer rates, its always advisable to go for field calibrations. After making adjustments as per the calibrations for a specific fertilizer rate, the flutted roller pick the fertilizer from the fertilizer box and then drop it on the aluminum flow control tongue (Figure 13). The flow control tongue drops the fertilizer uniformly in to the fertilizer pipe which is then applied into the soil through the fertilizer boot attached in the furrow opener.In this system the flutted rollers are prone to clog. The second system (Figure 15) is the rotating cell type fertilizer metering type. This system has the following components. In this fertilizer metering device, cells are fitted in separate compartments to allow fertilizer placement as required in each row or some selected rows only. Fertilizer can be increased or decreased by lifting or lowering the fertilizer box respectively. Fertilizer is simply metered by a series of cups on a roller (Figure 17). The rate of fertilizer can be read on the scale (Figure 16). However, calibration of machine for fixing desired fertilizer rates under laboratory situation as well as in field can be accomplished with the procedure mentioned later in this document. This system is almost maintenance free but the precision is less as compared to the first system.Drive wheel (Figure 18) is attached in the middle of the front bar of the frame. The function of drive wheel is to transmit power to the seed The depth control wheel (Figure 19) The lower nut is adjusted for the depth control.For example, if we have to increase the depth of the machine by one inch and there are 9 threads per inch then we have to move the lower nut by nine threads in the upper direction and tighten the upper nut. The adjustment of depth control should be done in the field itself to capture the real field situation.The power transmission unit has the following The function of power transmission unit (Figure 20) is to provide drive from drive wheel to all parts of the planter for example seed box rollers, fertilizer box rollers. First of all a chain set connects the drive wheel to the driving shaft. This shaft is connected to fertilizer and seed metering shafts with the help of another chain set which provide drive to the seed box roller and fertilizer box roller. Bevel gears are attached to the shaft drive for changing the vertical drive into the horizontal drive. The idler gear (Figure 21) is used to tighten or loosen the chain for its smooth operation. Seed and fertilizers delivery pipes (Figure 22) are attached to the seed and fertilizer boxes with the help of aluminum cups. These pipes carry the seed/fertilizer from the cups to the seed/ fertilizer boot. The tubes should be connected to seed/fertilizer cups firmly so that these may not come out during field operation. The following precautions should be taken care of Tubes should be protected from bending and breakage.Old/bent tubes should be replaced.Excessive bend in the tubes should be avoided otherwise the bend will cause obstruction in free flow of seed/fertilizer and result in non-uniform application and poor crop establishment.The tubes must be inserted about one inch into the seed/fertilizer boot to ensure proper seed/fertilizer delivery.Seed and fertilizer metering devices can increase or decrease seed rates within specified limits.To calibrate the planter to a desired seed and fertilizer rate, first fix the seed metering strip in the appropriate delivery notch and set the appropriate fertilizer rate with the help of lever or adjusting nut whatever mechanism is there in the planter. Measure circumference of drive wheel (Cd). Measure width of the drill (Wd), else multiply the number of tynes with distance between two tynes. Put seed in seed box and fertilizer in fertilizer box then rotate drive wheel manually to ten full rotations and collect seed delivered from each seed/fertilizer delivery tube separately in polythene bags (Figure 23).Weigh the seeds and fertilizer in each bag and also determine the total seed weight (Sw) and fertilizer weight (Fw). If the difference in seed/ fertilizer weight between individual delivery tubes is more than 10%, contact a mechanic/ expert to adjust or repair the machine. Calculate seed and fertilizer application rate per hectare using the following formula:Seed rate (kg/ha) = {Sw/(Cd × Wd Fertilizer rate (kg per hectare) can be determined using the same formula by substituting the total weight of fertilizer released in grams (Fw) in place of total weight of seeds (Sw). It is cautioned that calculated seed and fertilizer rates can differ from the actual rates due to drag and slippage of the drive wheel depending upon the soil moisture, surface roughness, presence of crop residue and field level. Carry out minor adjustment in seed/fertilizer rates by testing the machine in the field.First of all, fill the seed box and fertilizer box with seed and fertilizer and set the indicator at desired seed rate and fertilizer rate. Run the planter at a distance of 20 meters in the field.Collect the seed and fertilizer from the delivery pipes in polythene bags from each pipe. The amount of seed and fertilizer collected in each pipes in 20 meter run is then measured in grams. Then we calculate the seed rate and fertilizer rate by the given formula as under One acre = 4000 m 2Width of drill = x planter is attached to tractor through these three hitch points with the help of link pins. The top link hitch point also helps in leveling the machines. The three point hitch adjustments where the planter fixes to the tractor should be adjusted. The planter should level from side to side and have just enough forward and backward adjustment to enter the soil at the proper angle.While operating the planter in the field for planting, the soil moisture must be optimum both for the operation of planter as well as germination of the crop. Though the soil moisture for operation of planter in the field depends on soil type but the field should be neither too wet nor too dry so that both rut and clod formation can be avoided. First of all, planter is attached to the tractor (say 35 HP) by three point linkage. As the tractor moves the planter, the drive wheel rotates which in-turn rotates the chain-set attached to it on one end and to the drive shaft at other end. The drive shaft then provides the drive to the seed box shaft and fertilizer box shaft as all of these shafts are attached with a chain and gear drive. The fertilizer shaft is attached to the flutted rollers and when flutted roller rotates, the fertilizer enters into the spacing between the teeth of the roller and goes to the aluminium cup which drops the fertilizer to the fertilizer delivery pipes. At same time, the seed box shaft rotates the bevel gears attached to it. A bevel gear is attached at an angle of 90 degree which gives motion to the seed rollers. As seed rollers rotate, the seeds in the seed box enter into the spacing between the teeth and seeds go to the aluminium cup which drops the seeds into the seed delivery pipes. Now, the seed and fertilizer goes to the boot of the furrow openers from seed and fertilizer delivery pipes. As the furrow opener moves, the fertilizer and seeds are drilled into the soil in such a manner that the fertilizer is placed below the seed.Before operating the planter for the first time, read and understand this manual to become familiar with the major components of planter, mechanism, adjustments, and operating systems of the planter. Before each use in the field, ensure following things to make sure all necessary items are checked and adjusted.Check the condition of the planter and make any adjustments or repairs necessary particularly, the fasteners, blade bolts and welds before operating. Replace any broken or worn out parts.Select the proper row spacing, seed quantity, and depth according to the field condition and crop. (Re-adjust seed rate and planting depth after trial).Make sure that the seeds to be planted are clean, and free of soil and pebbles. Do not mix fertilizer with the seeds when seeding, as this will damage the seed metering device.Add the seed to the seed box. Do not fill the seed box more than three quarters full, in order to prevent the automatic dropping of the seeds from the opening in the inclined seed plates due to vibration in planter while under operation.Make sure that the fertilizer is clod free.Calibrate the planter as given in heading 4 and 5.Before operating the multi-crop planter, one should consider following operating notes:When tilling and seeding back and forth across the plot, line the planter up so the next row is at the desired spacing from the last row just planted.While operating, pay attention to how much seed is left, and whether the seeds are blocked in the seed delivery pipe or in the hole of the furrow opener. If the tractor is backed up while the planter is operating, soil will be jammed into the furrow opener (slits) and block seeding. If this happens, turn off the engine, and clean the furrow openers and seed delivery pipes as necessary. Restart the engine, raise the implement to back up, and re-plant the area that did not receive seed.Throttle down when approaching the end of the plot. Lift the planter through hydraulic system when about 2.5 metres away from the end of the plot, then turn the tractor. After turning, again bring down the planter with hydraulic system.Lift the planter through hydraulic system when the implement crosses a ridge or is in transport. Lower the roller to raise the blades to the maximum height while walking or transporting the tractor on the road.Stop the engine before fixing a breakdown or adjusting or changing implements.After completion of the operation, remove the remaining seeds, and fertilizer and wash the mud and weeds from the planter.DO NOT leave seed or fertilizer in the boxes over time as the seed attracts the rodents and can damage the inner parts of the seed box while fertilizer can chock the fertilizer metering system. After cleaning, lubricate the chain, and all other moving parts.The planter should be properly serviced and maintained. It should be checked before use to ensure that all the nuts and bolts are tightened and that all the parts are in good condition. For example, if the openers are worn out, they should be replaced. The fertilizer and seed boxes should also be in good condition to allow free flow of seed and fertilizer. Chains should be adjusted and oiled. After use at the end of each day, the machine should be checked, the seed and fertilizer boxes cleaned, and the moving parts oiled. After the planting season, the machine should be properly stored.Before storing the planter for any length of time, clean each part of the machine; apply grease/oil to the transmission chain and moving parts. Store the machine in a dry, wellventilated store. Keep the appropriate tools with the machine during storage to ensure that they will be available when needed again.Seed not placed at desired depth 1. Adjustment of depth control wheel is not proper 1. Properly adjust the depth of furrow openers with the help of depth control wheel. "} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4765223820.json b/main/part_2/4765223820.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45af457c92e7d71ad0a3b871e40bdc4b43f5af35 --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4765223820.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5f056c71f558169b9484d4e107ef98f8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ba29368f-b2f0-4359-be98-512e172f3f66/retrieve","id":"-1470849499"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e23a1813-1764-4bb9-ab79-7461eb121354","content":"The livestock sector is one of the main pillars of Ethiopia's economy, contributing approximately 45% to the agricultural GDP (Negassa et al. 2013;FAO 2017). Ethiopia's annual milk and dairy products imports are valuated over 45 million Birr (1.2 million USD), and demand for animal source foods is projected to increase due to the high population, income growth and urbanization (Abera, 2012). Besides the critical economic and social roles that livestock play in the livelihoods of smallholder farmers, it helps people cope with shocks and accumulate wealth, particularly where formal financial institutions are lacking. Despite the importance of livestock in the Ethiopian economy, several constraints related to livestock production, such as low livestock productivity, remain a major barrier to the development of the livestock sector in Ethiopia (Negassa et al., 2013;Shapiro et al., 2015). According to Shapiro et al. (2015), better breeds (i.e., genetics), feed, and veterinary care are critically important for improving the productivity of dairy cows in Ethiopia. Thus, this study evaluates how improving animal feed resources and breeds impact both household income and nutrition through the production, consumption and sale of live animals and animal products.A farm level economic and nutrition simulation model (FARMSIM) was used to carry out the study in Upper Gana kebele (village), Lemo woreda (district), which is located in Hadiya zone of the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region (SNNP) region of Ethiopia. Crop and animal production are the major economic activities in this part of the country. FARMSIM is a Monte Carlo simulation model that simultaneously evaluates and forecasts for five years a current (baseline) crop and livestock farming systems and an alternative technology system for a farm (Bizimana & Richardson, 2019). In the study presented here, small-scale irrigation technologies, improved seeds and fertilizer are used to grow and improve yields of fodder (oats, vetch). It assumes that these are fed to native and dairy crossbred cows and that the aim is to improve household nutrition and income. Annual net farm cash income (profit) and the benefit cost ratio are the economic key output variables calculated by the model, while the nutrition variables comprise average available daily intake of calories, protein, fat, calcium, iron, and vitamin A for an adult equivalent (AE). Total nutrients consumed by the family from all sources are summed across plant and animal food stocks and compared with minimum daily recommended amounts for adults published by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (FAO, 2001a&b;FAO, 2010;IOM, 2006) to evaluate nutrition adequacy.Input data for FARMSIM comprises information on farm assets, liabilities, production costs, yields, output prices, and use of crops and livestock products for human consumption and livestock feed. The input information on crops and livestock for the baseline scenario was acquired from a household survey conducted in Lemo woreda by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in 2017. Data input for the alternative scenarios were collected during field trials conducted from 2015-2017 with local farmers in Upper Gana and Jawe kebeles and led by the Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa Rising), the International Water Management Institute and the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) (Schmitter et al., 2016). Information on crossbred cows was collected from field trials and farmers in Lemo (SNNP region). A crossbred cow can produce approximately 5 liters per day with supplemental forage nutrition, or 1500 liters annually assuming 305 lactating days in year, as opposed to 1.2 liters for local or native cows (Adie Aberra and Bezabih M. Derseh/ILRI, personal communication 2019). This information is roughly comparable to the numbers reported in the Ethiopian Livestock Master Plan for the period from 2014/2015-2019/2020 in which crossbred dairy cows are expected to produce 6 liters per day compared to 1.9 liters for local or native cows (Shapiro et al., 2015).To explore the synergistic benefits arising from livestock and irrigation innovations, livestock production technologies (fodder, crossbred cows) were aligned with water lifting technologies (rope and washer, solar pumps). In the baseline scenario, fodder crops (oats, vetch) are grown on limited land with minimal irrigation and fertilizer applications. Due to limited production, all the fodder produced is sold at the market for revenue generation. However, in the alternative scenarios, more land (3-7 times the baseline scenario land) is allocated to fodder especially during the dry season due to irrigation in addition to raising crossbred cows. Higher fertilizer rates and improved seeds are also utilized in the alternative scenarios compared to the baseline. A portion of the total production of fodder is fed to cows, bulls, and sheep to increase the production of milk and meat while the remainder is sold to generate income. The four scenarios analyzed are as follows:To show the full potential of adopting new technologies, the alternative crop farming technologies are assumed to be fully adopted (100%) while a lower and progressive adoption rate was considered for the livestock technologies in the course of the five-year forecasting period based on household survey information. We also assume in the model that there is at least one crossbred cow per household in Lemo, although its adoption is still low (3%) due to the high purchasing cost. Consequently, we incorporated a loan scheme for each household in Lemo to purchase one crossbred cow, payable in four years at 10% interest rate. Second, the markets were assumed to be accessible and competitive with no distortion. Last, based on preliminary simulation runs on profitability, we estimated that each household, in both baseline and alternative scenarios will allocate close to 37% of their net profit (if available) to purchase supplemental foodstuffs that comprise staples and animal source foods. In this analysis, farm families consume food grown on the farm and/or purchased at the market for their nutrition. A preliminary analysis of food items consumed by an average household in Lemo woreda indicates a predominance of a cereal-based diet with Baseline:No or minimal irrigation; no supplemental fodder feeding; local or native cows Alt.1--R&W-P_N:Rope and washer pump used in optimally irrigated systems + Supplemental feeding of native cows Alt.2--Solar-P_N: Solar pump used in optimally irrigated systems + Supplemental fodder of native cows Alt.3--Solar-P_CB: Solar pump used in optimally irrigated systems + Supplemental fodder feeding of crossbred cows Milk quantity (L)/Year / Household substantial shortage of animal-source food consumption. About 64% of the profit is allocated to the purchase of eggs and butter under alternative scenarios for nutrition improvement. Although no new milk purchase was made under the alternative scenarios and the fraction of milk consumed (70%) remained unchanged for all scenarios, the quantity consumed increased at home due to the increase in milk production under alternative scenarios (Figure 1). The types of crops grown and consumed by families in Lemo woreda comprised mainly wheat, maize, teff, cabbage, carrots, banana and haricot beans and moderate purchases of teff and maize were added to these. Significant amounts of vegetables (carrot and cabbage) were purchased under the Alt.3 scenario associated with crossbred cows to compensate for the reallocation of land previously used for on-farm vegetable production to fodder production. On-farm production and consumption of animal products such as milk, butter, eggs, chicken, sheep, and beef were included also in the analysis.The annual net cash farm income (NCFI) in year five, which represents the economic profitability at the household level, shows that the average profit under alternative scenarios (Alt.1, Alt.2, and Alt.3) is two to three times higher than that of the baseline scenario. The increase in profit from the baseline to the alternative scenarios were 90%, 99% and 263%, respectively (Table 1). However, the NCFI distribution shows between 4% and 6% probability of having a profit equal to or less than zero (loss) for Alt.1 and Alt.2 but only 0.2% probability for Alt.3 (crossbred cow scenario). Although the profit under alternative farming technologies shows higher gains compared to the baseline, the distribution results highlight the risk associated with high production and water lifting tool (such as solar pump) costs involved in investing in small scale irrigation technologies investment. Alt.3 associated with crossbred cows, clearly shows higher profit compared to other scenarios, as its cumulative distribution function curve stands farther to the right of all other scenarios, mainly due to increase in fodder sale. To assess whether the benefits are worth the investment cost, a cost benefit analysis was conducted using two net present value-related metrics illustrated by the benefit cost ratio (BCR) and the internal rate of return (IRR). The two metrics inform on the profitability and return on investments in small-scale irrigation technologies, fertilizers and crossbred cows. The results indicate on average BCR values for all alternative scenarios equal or greater than 1.0, and IRR values equal or greater than the discount rate of 0.1 (threshold values), which is an indication of profitability (or break-even) of the investment in alternative technology (Table 1). Noticeably for Alt.2 scenario under the solar pump system and native cows, the results show on average a break-even point with a BCR ratio of 1 and an IRR of 0.1.We evaluated nutrition variables and compared them to daily minimum requirements per AE, to determine adequacy of calories, proteins, fat, calcium, iron, and vitamin A intake available to the household.Simulation results show that the amount of milk consumed by families in Lemo increased by 77% in Alt.1 and Alt.2 scenarios associated with native cows compared to the baseline scenario, while the amount of eggs consumed increased four times. Under the Alt.3 scenario associated with crossbred cows, milk production by families increased 3-fold (304%) while the consumption of eggs increased 28-fold due to purchases. The amount of butter consumed by families increased by 62% from the baseline to Alt.1 & 2 scenarios, while it increased 20 times for Alt.3. due to purchases. The expansion of irrigated fodder cropping area under Alt.3. led to an increase in fodder production as well as fodder sales, which led to 5-fold increases in receipts and profit compared to the baseline. The increase in live weight for cattle and sheep led to an increase in consumption of beef by 31% and mutton by 54%. Overall, the nutrition simulation results show that the food products consumed by families in the baseline and alternative scenarios met the minimum daily requirements for calories, proteins, iron, and vitamin A but were insufficient for meeting calcium and fat requirements (Table 2). Calcium deficiency may be due to low consumption of animal products rich in calcium in developing countries (vs. developed countries) as well as possible high threshold value (1 gram) in comparison to the actual daily requirements (Agueh, V. et. al, 2015;FAO, 2001). The consumption of milk, however, alleviated some of the deficits in calcium, increasing its intake by 73% under Alt.1 & 2 and 84% under Alt.3. Deficits in fat were completely addressed by the increase in consumption of purchased butter under Alt.3 scenario. Improving feed resources and cow genetics (using crossbreds that produce more milk) can address the potential shortage in milk supply that the livestock sector in Ethiopia is expected to face in future due to the increases in population, urbanization and income. In this study, we simulate the production and use of irrigated fodder through improved small-scale irrigation technologies to produce feeds for livestock and sell the surplus for income generation. This is coupled with introduction of crossbred dairy cows with a potential for milk production that is three times higher than that of local or native cows. The simulation results show the economic feasibility of these enterprises and also predict potential profits under the alternative scenarios (irrigation technologies and crossbred cows) compared to the baseline if crossbred cows and improved production of feeds are adopted. Deficits in fat intake at the household level are addressed while those in calcium are partially alleviated through the increase in milk consumption. Therefore, adopting improved livestock technologies (feed and improved breeds) has potential to improve economic and nutritional wellbeing in Ethiopia and presents an opportunity to help the country meet its goals of economic development, better nutrition, and improved food security."} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/main/part_2/4797709176.json b/main/part_2/4797709176.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..68391c374fa5d5bb74bc3cba45e6cec59b55127b --- /dev/null +++ b/main/part_2/4797709176.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3e7829832055ba00889ec20bcaab2a4b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H023540.pdf","id":"127051032"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c422f838-de36-478d-8b9d-82f5bb4169d4","content":"]]] 0.1 -0. J IIllllO.J -0.6 ~0.6 -0.6 ~0.6 -1.0 .1.0 < WATER WITHDRAWALS IN 1991 In the absence of primary data, we use the total withdrawals estimated for Sri Lanka by ESCAP (1995) for our analysis. Of the total withdrawals of 9.66 km' in 1991, while the agriculture sector has used 96 percent and the domestic and industrial sectors have used 2 percent each. As in the water supply, the distribution of water withdrawals at the district level is also not available. The estimation procedure is briefly explained below. (See Amarasinghe,